Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1990/11/14 - Agenda Packet0701 -02 011- 14 -90 PC Agenda. 0 1 of 6` r<<enko s, CITY OF RAr]CE-i0 CUCAMONGA o _ L'I:ANNING CCMMISaSICW 1977 WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 14, 1990 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pleilge of Allegiance II. Roll Earl Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Melcher _ Commissioner McNiel Commis ,,,;ner Tolstoy Y III. Announcements IV. ApprovaV of Minutes Adjourned Meeting of July 19, 1990 Adjourned Meeting of August 2, 1990 Ad_ourned Meeting of Se ?tember 20, 1980 October 10, 1990 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. if anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. DFS1dR REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13564 'PHASES 2 -,5 - AKINS - The design review of building elevatii,ns and detailed site plan for 145 lots of a previously County- approved map consisting of 182 lots on 81.9 acres of land north of Summit Avenue and east of Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 226 - 082 -24 t-- 26. 9 ' VI. Public Hearings The folIowir. 4tems are pushic hearings in which concerned individuals ty voice f.reir opinion_ of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address; All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes ppy individual for Each project. Please sign in after speakin, B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 90 -08 - BROCK - A request to reduce the minimum net av -rage lot size from 22,500 to 21,935 square feet and to reduce the minimum lot depth of Lot 3 from 150 to 124 feet for a 40 lot subdivision on 25.9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) located east of Haven Avenue and north of Ringstem Drive - APN -: 0201- 121 -24. Related file- Tentative Tract 14771. (Continued from October 24, 1990.) C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14771 - BROCK - A rest denti - i subdivision of 40 single family lots on 25.9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units- per acre) located east of Haven Avenue and north of Ringstem Drive APN1 0201- 121 -24. Rebated filer Variance 90 -08. (Continued from October 24, 1990.) D. MODIFICATION TO TENTPTIVE TRACT 13564 - AKINS A modification to a residential subdivision of 182 lots on 122.2 acres of land for a. previously approved County map located north of Summit Avenue and east' of Wardman Bullock Road APN: 226 - 082 -24 to 26. (Continued from October 24, 1990.) E. MODIFICATION TO COVDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89 -17 - INLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP - A request to modify conditions- of approval relative to the timing of on -site improvements for a previously approved project consisting of a church in an existing building totaling 16,457 square feet on 2.42 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling unitx per acre) located at the nc;rthwest corner of 19th Street and Amethyst Avenue - APN: 201- 474 -02 and 03. Related file: Conditional Use Permit 90 -09. (Continued from October 24, 1990.) F. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -19 -- PACIFIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES The request to modify a condition of approval limiting the number of employees for a medical office in a l(-sed space of 16,856 square feet within an existing industrial park on 1.57 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Specific located at 10837 Laurel Street APN;: 208- 351 -57, (Continued from October 24, 1990.) T G. MODIFICATION TO TRACT 10035 - CALPROP - A request to delete a condition of approval requiring; all driveways to be n maximum of 24 feet wide per City Standard Ho. 305 for Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14 -17, 20 aixl 21 for a previously approved tract consisting of 38 I single family lots an °71.7 acres of land in the Low Residential District (c -4 dwelling units per acre), licated south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, G south of Calle Corazon -'APN: 207 - 631 -01 through 11 and 207- 641 -01 through 10. (Continued from October 24, 1990.) H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTI,G TENTATIVE TRACT ,'. 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY The development of 328 condominium units on 20..15 acres of land in the Medium High Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) in the Victoria Planned Community, located on the northeast corner of Base line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227- 691 -01. I. VARIANCE 90 -11 - FIDELITY CONSTRUCTION - A request to allow a free- standing - decorative arch structure to be located within the front yard setback of a single family lot within the Very lour Residential District (1 -2 dwelling units per -acre) at i ^482 Almond Avenue - A. °N: 1074- 121 -26. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90 -18 - PITASSIJOALMAU - The proposed development of a truck rental, leasing, and maintenance facility, including a maintenance and' administration building, covered fuel island, drive -thru wash building, and parsyng area for 129 vehicles, located at the west side of 'Santa Anita Avenue, north of 4th Street in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14) of the Industrial Specific Plan - APN: 229- 331 -6. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14535-- WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A residential subdivision of 95 single family lots on 18.0 acres of land within the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) of the 'Victoria Planned Community, located on the _northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane - APd: 227. 011 -17. TO BE CONTINUED TO JANUARY 23, 1991. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14536 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A residential subdivision of 57 1 single family lots on 12.4 acres of land within the L&w- Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units pe.- acre) of the Victoria Planned Community. located on the i -south side of Highland Avenue east of Woodruff place - APN: 227 - 011 -20. TO BE CONTINUED TO JANUARY 23, 1991. i M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MA's 13601 - BARTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A subdivision of 2.447 acres of land into 2 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea al. of the Industrial Area SpecifiS Plan,:TScated at the north side of Fulton Court east ofz l;'tica Avenue - APN: 209- 144 -71. N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1308b - ROBERT LESONDAK - A cabdivision of 1.65 4cres of land into 2 parcels in '?.he Loci Residential' District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) located at the west side of Hellman Avenue south of 19th Street - APN: 209- 041 -36. 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL 14AP 13075 - 14ILLIAM PERRY ROOFING - subdivision of 1.3 acres of land into 2 parcel's in the Loki Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) located at the west side of Hellman Avenue south of 19th Street - APN: 202- 041 -30. VII. Nei Business P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -42 - HIND S. KW`:E - The development of a medical o$rlce totaling 21,;00 square fee. on 1.25 acres of land in the - Office /Professional, District, located at tle southeast corner of Base i.ine Road and Carnelial Street - APH: 207!-031-29. ;Continued from October 24 1.990.) VIII. Co®ission. Business Q. APPOINTMENT TO SUBCOMMITTEE TO STUDY TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE Oral re -kort_ IX. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be disct ;ed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. _ X. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopUd Administrative Regulations that set an 12:00 P.M. adjournment- time. If items go beyond that times they shall be heard only With the consent of the Commission �- .� p Planning Commission Meeting of tl ?v j RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN -UP SHEET Please print y -)ur name, address, city, and indicate the item that you wish to spbak on. Thank you. NAME ADDRESS CITY ITEM N. 2• � C..�E- °A.2cZ 33�S�i� -t S-r S��oa C:3�.a}daao 1��G 3.�Y /y�.�lc 4. '��Q R 6 pm l i372enyrnt ��/C% 6. 7• f s }$9q Toleh 470 Dr- X,L i3. ta./iW l�i metl -a 10 576 f/�+.Y -�` %�1-% ,• 9. 10• �iY�W�l2 l J 12. 4' f�3rpld i`nrl H " (? ( -hP1 il1rar TT aro �L9l4Gt .i�t' C 17 9�[lJF.1 �[LtC�la l ro� C r 20. 04k,, /e J7ucs,3si�!�eel, 21, �l2acL l�tt 1p;J3t�iGrr�t, 22. 23. flllyl i ��hPY�a I L O fY 24. ISM 361�+G� ILnFt'SU a ?rzrtl Gn. 4� 25. vo 29. f . SiLLIIs_:IVVI�iI ,G. t �y 31, �iu�2-7z N ' (' �itS .uue�ia 932• e PASmpN.1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA"viONGA STAFF RETORT yM1 DATE; November 14{ 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13564 (PHASES 2-5) AKINS The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 145 lots of a previously County - approved map consisting of 182 lots on 81.9 acres of land north of Summit Avenue and east of Wardman Bullock Road - APN. 226 - 082-24 to 26. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re nested; Approval of building elevations and plot plans. B. Project Density: 1.7 dwelling units per acre. C. Surroundina Land Use and 7on9n North - Vacant, Southern California Edison right -of -way; west Foothill Residential 1/'10 South - Vacant, Southern California Edison right -of -way and Tract 13565 beyond; Very Low Residential East - West - Vacant, San Sevaine -lash; west Foothill Floodway Vacant; west Foothill Residential - 20,000 square foot minimum lot size D. General Plan Designations• Project Site -Vey Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) North - South Utility Corridor and Hillside Residential beyond - Utility Corridor and Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) beyond East - Open Space /Flood Contra] West - Open Space /Flood Control 11. ANALYSIS: A. General: Tract 13564 was approved by the County of San 8ernardfno and includes five phases. An Annexation and Development Agreement was approved by tie Rancho Cucamonga i=ce J A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' TT 13564 AKINS ' NOVEMBER 1e, 1990 Page 2 City Council and entered into as of January 7, 1989. Akins Development Company is submitting a Design Review package for Phases 2 -5 (145 lots). The approved lots range in size from 14,053 to 42,712 square feet. Average lot size is 18,665 square feet. The appT ?cant has utilized the Monterey, Santa Barbara Revival and San. Juan architectural styles which are required in the Etiwznda Highlands Area III of the proposed ,Etiwanda 'North Specific Plan. B. Design. Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Blakesley, Kroutil) reviewed the project sn October 19, 1989 and did not approve it, but requested that it return to Design Review Committee as a full calendar item. The following concerns were required to addressed by the applicant: 1. Additional det&iling should generally be provided on all elevations. 2. More balconies should be added to the Monterey floor plans. 3. More substantial cornice detailing should be provided. 4. There should be greater differentiation between the three architectural styles. 5. Where porches are provided, they should be more substantial. 6. Driveway treatments should be upgraded tc provide a more distinctive treatment. The distance from•.ths front yard walkway to the front of the garage should be shortened. 7. Gates in front yard return walls should be constructed of substantially sized members. The applicant revised the project and it was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Blakesley, Weinberger, Kroutil) on November 16, 1989. 74Ne Committee requested that the following items be addressed and returned to the Design Review Committee as a Consent Calendar item: 1. Driveway treatments should be upgraded to provide a more distinctive treatment. The distance from the front 'yard walkway to the front of the garage should be shortened. EM Ex PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13564 - AKINS NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 3 2. Blank side elevations, primarily on the one -story models, should be enhanced. < Detailing should be added to the San Juan elevations. Some other material, such as clay or brick, may be incorporated. 4. The left side elevation of the Plan 2 model should be upgraded. The applicant should consider extending the length of the trellis. 5. The applicant should consider providing multi -paned windows on the Monterey elevations. 6. More functional balconies should be provided on the Monterey elevations. ThE applicant revised the project further and the Committee (,Weinberger, McNiel, Kroutil) - onditionally approved tie project on ,January 18, 1990 with the fol%7 ing items to be brought back for Committee approval prior to proceeding to the Planning Commission: 1. The proposed driveway treatments were approved with the condition that smooth, broom finish and aggregate finishes be used in equal amounts. The Committee did not approve the use of salt finish concrete. The example provided For Lot 5 should have a- smaller scored pattern along the driveway. 2. The Committee noted that certain windows had been deleted from the proposal seen by them on November 16, 1989. These windows should be added back on. - 3. Additional materials should be added to the San Juan elevations. The Committee felt the addition of the tile aas minimal. 4. Blank side elevations of one -story models should be upgraded further. 5. More 'functional balconies should be provided on the Monterey elevations. On February 8, 1990, the Committee (McNiel, Biakesley, Coleman) reviewed. the grading concept for the project at the request of the Grading Committee. The Grading Committee felt that the project was in conflict with established Commission (4-3 PLANMNG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13564 - AKINS NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 4 policy and requested that the Design Review Committee provide additional direction: The main concerns of the Grading Committee were as follows: 1. Slopes in rear yards which exceeded 12 feet. 2. Slopes in rear yards which exceeded 12 feet and backed onto public streets. 3. The issue of proposed Homeowner's Association maintenance of slopes._ 4. Drainage of all lots to the street, rather than through an enclosed pipe. 5. The absence of any split_ in finish floor elevations to take up grade. The Committee reviewed the grading concept anJ referred the plans back to the Grading Committee with the following direction' 1. The grading concept as presented was not tcceptable to the Committee. Techniques such as contour grading, combined gradient slopes, limited cut and fill and split level architectural prototypes, stem walls, or padding for the structures only should be utilized to reduce grading. 2. All side and fear yard slopes should be revised to follow City standards as much as possible. Current Building and Safety Standards permit maximum 8 -foot rear yard slopes (or 12 -foot with 4 feet retaining) and maximum side yard - slopes of 5 feet. If there are particular areas where these standardz cannot be met after exhausting all alternatives, these will be re- reviewed by the Design Review Committee. On March 22, 1990, the Committee (Chitiec, Blakesloy, Kroutil) reviewed the revised elevations, did not approve them, and requested that the felowing revisions be made and reviewed as a Consent Wender item prior to scheduling for Planning Commission: 1. All original references to pre -cast concrete trim as an accent on dot shelves, etc., should be retained as shown on the plans reviewed by the Committee on January :8, 1990. The Committes noted these items were changed to stucco tri(c which is not acceptable, U1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13564 - AKINS NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 5 ti 2. All Santa Barbara elevation types should utilize the pre -cast concrete trim. 3. Thr shelf on the rear elevation of Plan 1 (Santa Barbara) shtld utilize the pre -cast concrete trim (see Sheet 4). 4. Pli 1, ?Monterey, left side elevation is acceptable with a 1. -foot minimum offset (see Sheet 5). 5. All Santa Barbara elevations should be provided with mult—paned windows on all four sides. 6. There was no change on Sheets 8 and 10 from the January 18, 1990 Design Review Committee meeting as indicated. Side elevations are still too blank. 7. On ail San Juan elevations where tile is proposed, it should bA utilized on all four sides. I 8. On Sheet 10, the curved window element on the front side should be repeated on the left side. 9. On Sheet 17 (Plan 2, Monterey), the base material of the functional balcony should be stucco. 10. On Sheet 25 (Plan 4, Monterey), offsets should be 12 inches minimum. The chimney should also be upgraded on this plan. 11. On Sheet 25 (Plan 4, Monterey), additional detailing should be provided at the third car garage. 12. On Sheet 26 (Plan 4, Monterey), an additional reveal should be added to the right side elevation. 13. On Sheet 28 (Plrn 4, Santa Barbara), the offset should be a minimum 12 inches in widtk. 14. On Sheet 32 (Plan 4, Santa Barbara), all windows on each side should be multi- paned. 15. On Sheet 42 (Plan 6, Monterey), French doors should be added at the balcony window above the front door. The architecture was revised further and presented to the Committee (Melcher, Weinberger, Coleman) on August 16, 1990 as a full calendar item so that the applicant could be present. The Committee approved the project with the following conditions PLANNING COMMISSION S14FF REPORT TT 13564 - AKINS NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 6 ti 1. Catalog cuts on the false wood shutters should be provided prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. A radius cut should be provided for the ends of all rafter tails. 3. The applicant has agreed to comply with the above- noted commc.,cs #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15. These wily be added as conditions of approval. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project nn October 17, 1989 and recommended approval subject to the additional conditions listed in the attached Resolution of Approval. Planning Commission review of the project was delayer' pending Flood Control District and City Engineer review of the flood protectioi facilities design, so that effects of that design on lot layout and grading, particularly in the northwest corner of the site, would be known. The engineering and flood control issues are addressed under the report for Tentative Tract 13564 (Modification). D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the proposal on October 16, 1989, November 14, 1989, and January 2, 1990. The following issues were dealt with at the above meetings: - incompleteness items. - heights of rear yard and side yard slopes in excess of current City standards. - height r slopes in conflict with the intent of the appre =.d Development Agreement text. - battery drainage concept was not acceptable. - lack of splits within pad elevations to take up grade. After the January 2, 1990 meeting, the applicant requested policy direction from the Design Review Committee. As noted in the previous section, the Design Review Committee reviewed the concept on February 8, 1990, provided policy direction and returned it to the Grading Committee. Revised grading plans were reviewed by the Grading Committee on July 3. 1990 and were approved on July 30, 1990. The revised plans provided splits between pad and garage floor on El PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13564 - AKINS NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 7 some lots, contour grading t2 '`piques, 5 -foot minimum side x yard slopes, 10 -12 -foot minimum rear yard slopes, use of hinge lines with eight percent slopes in the some rear and side yards, and cross -lot drainage limited to two Tots draining to one in an unierground pipe. In addition, the northerly property slope was reduced to a maximum of 20 feet. The northerly slope height is higher due to the construction of the Morse Levee and drainage channel to the north. Since the time of approval by the Grading Committee, the grading plan has been revised along the forth tract boundary to reflect a wider channel width which was required by the County Flood Control District. The revisions were approved by the Grading Committee on October 3, 1990. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Development Code, the General Plan, and the Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the piltrposed use is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning- Commission approve the Design Review for Tract 13564 (Phases 2 -5) through . adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. Resp Oly s itted, 6 d er Ci Ian BB :BN :mlg Attacth;ients: Exhibit "A"' - Tract Map Exhibit "B" - Conceptual landscape Plan Exhibit "C" - Wail Types Exhibit "D" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "E"' - Site Plan Exhibit "F" - Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Building Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions — 3 a -4iL- Zz- 1mvp oft''frraa t 1 Nam It e 71 ` 4 ��•t C � � (v �' . �� •: ? r •" � .t'Q' • a ' .. ylaC -^. o -- t'Iih. .y%- � ,_ : � ' 1 � � '� �•t S � � i 1 •, Ni•� r � a�• 17�j '''V � � r •ti •1 •`t 'J��. � i 'i ( � t =} 3 irk- '. ✓, � •� :J 1. •} w ; 1 � •�� 5 ` � j _ }; :jai P�) • is �.• � p� t. � ).�•` .�•� I � �� 1 , �.• it� 1 '�1 t' r r� Y�:� :�lr •�ir .� }` \0t ` ;i !I( � �� .. Al .a,W dt rO r t ` � !. • 11 t' 1� + fDi •. ' � _ � 4 i 1yi ` T} '. '�1 !1� (•mot -y I •� .fir .z t y, ' . y '�� • a y� (f3Y1tl 011Yir -Ira t') NAY CITY CF + 1NtiOdA PLANNING DiVEM �t N�Ob}F'f2fiMu MAP EXHiBrT =--A scAL,Et q -T Z' z 0 i it! W z t N rk If } �• ii i i f 1- 4 1 • pt i t; tq = 4 _ .q . 3AIUa OINOINd Ny5 g a �. �z, ` OV08 111350LJ:iV a . •+} • ..,I Tars.. ' $ • LU CL LU t i Lu U, CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLA NNiN —.DIVI d EXEiIffit'= -2 �r:ALE __�_ pt Jr tt LU ul > EXH[Br.r-. SCALE: Q'-Ij Lu cn R-EM. PR &.15W TnU- EXH[Br.r-. SCALE: Q'-Ij CITY OF n-EM- i?g iW44 tm-- RANCHO CUCAlVKX*4CA Tnu: L8Nmo(4a,-,01-�- PLANNM DIVISM EXHIST. 0-4 SCALP-- [I. �l U., I E I STUCCO WALL V .. OPEN VIEW FENCE. i �41tht 'rl 11Pr at tU _`S QdifYl rEA roll P d i WPfSr aR tU RR � � —_ nY/1P IM AYE ��r awY anrww t SrWIR � .EEiu ' ENHANCED STUCCO WALL ENHANCED OPEN VIEW FENCE r .r *, w fOYr HOOD$ Etrri R iAm .. � W . � j � P[OMEtPMar. 1 �a.u. rrli ra.urrYl - M1 5t w.yfjrf y4� — 1 1 OfMR SAN JUAN THEME 4 -rah rA.G 9ratdbt .�. WOOOFENCE - AINRL [ hr„uf lf,NttU � !.. �huYth.rR if rPw• Y1rKIR.P P[[iSliW(urE. 'AQStwW0ltf I� �I 11 �i zrYN.M Wp4 Y4Mr MONTEREY THEME { 1 IL Ij�Y•.•.• -!• rWRKFP6.a H14r P„ I MAILBOX �- z r r eriou�wt wtrD YfN4•iAnatwrDRt1 • —��— —s Rri4rFRENII.' SANTA BARBARA REVIVAL THEM Z _ a • 1� �•��_ �� •fit .,� < N W F O < :7 I• x w t o CITY OF rrEM- IM lMhk RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE: - ��smr r�►rou M�) R.ANI� ING EXV EXh11B1`n fi scALE:, -- `10, .1� 1 11 11 NORTH H Trn E: T err PG _ EXHIBIT =-� SCALE: 1 U fi- I'7 f rrEM: DE 115'T TITLE: _A!jgQ -snLy EXHIBIT. "° Z ALE: 4Q 4� LIM: w i7m. LE 0-.TAb - TrrLE: ctclwa affil ExHiBrr. - F —I SCALE: Q -19 E `J RAND CUCAMONNCA, TITLE: 6R+`1tYNE, p w PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: P Z SCALE: Le nw.__D 13564 TrIU. -69AD N6 � !y Q EXHiBrr: F —3 sc.ALE: - =-I EEF I itMEW f y k A. V lu El CITY OF rrEM- i-ly-4 kAW,cD CUCAMONrA MU:_�194D/A/A W& PLANNING DW&ON EXHIST, Z (o SC' ALE- MISS, \� I i 1 rrEM: —_ne 4 Tnu: -ur eA PIN6 PL ni Exwtiwr: - r 2 scALE: 9y LJ Elf] CITY CF OA • ;,. , nANNM DPASKYN i M.. „,. , i • �' ” `. � 7r . «L.,�ti x. '., \r..� �� r L CITYCF rrEM-. Q9 tM& PLANNM EXHmrr. 1 :10 scALE. f NOUH CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tnu:- PLANNING D(VISK)N EXHIMT. SCALE.. E LEFT slDE )T-)& 11 U ELEVATMM SANTA BARBARA REAR =W -NV \ ,RfGHT SIDE C d v SANTdT', SARA(( A 0 u E L-31!zff V 4 A IEBEY MEM: 49 Q.V, ¢ EXHwr. -. SCALE= 11 C d L i1 ELEVATIONS MONTEREY' _ a El E PLANNING DlV9WN W O N O Q m i AF gfl N Q o� a¢ a� a HLU ua 1 rrEM= -P& 03.3Yn 4 TITLE= �3tJt4 / l6_1V�4 ?�GN/S q -33 I'- J 1p rr FS . t' t Y Q U\l i cis 'zx C Zia S _ =i► t t C to D N 2 :7 Ic I- I Q Wy TrcLE= =rrs EX H IBM SCA LE. z L-1 E 9 �0 , a /«i Q � xcc a o� aW �0 , a /«i !!fl, �. | / � !! . G x � ■ § § AOL } � o � §} ` ;■ � ! � k \ « L12� .. . .. .. � » ® »< « »m< .. . . r �s �e t AA T 'N. El", I Ca' H n G'i H ` i Em. T II s Lam =I.4,`Yi p EXHisrr. G -/2 sc;LE, `7" qD 11 U 'No LEFT SIDE fl-D&M 4 _ EEEVATIM MONTEREY rmm, 3IeL EXiiIBB' # -!3 ALE, �y�1 REAR .Mw fteAt m Ricor SIDE a e /J ELEVATIONS MONTEREY u r LEFT sIvE Lr B&4Y!ON� VTA 8AR@ARA REAR RIGHT SIDE p d '6 ELEVATIONS SANTA BARBARA F. t 1if /r. 11 Ic iu il'il f Oqz I W O mvh t�,r+ f. j�i�ilE ! rrzm, eg _6.5 EXHIRT: SCALE, �a,/y(, � in- fill r -.N oa i �I �i 11 ii t A R� �k r -1t - a 0 w a 4 a cz a W W. a h ti b C PLANNIWG D(*v FXHJerr= srcAL-v: r, 3 RESOLUTION NO., A RESOLUTIOR OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANC140 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 13564 C98SiSTING OF 145 LOTS ON .61.9 ACRES OF LAND NORTH OF SUMMIT AVENUE AND EAST OF HAROMAN BULLOCK ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APS: 226- 082 -24 TG Z6, A. Recitals -. (i) Akins Development Company has filed as application for the Design Review of Tract No. 13s64 as described ;n the title, of this Resolution, Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application:" (ii) On November 14, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamor keld a ttteetiig to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequis?tes prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THERUORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the i r,anning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as fe' A: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon Substantial evidence presented to thir, Commission during the above - referenced meeting on November 14, 1990, including written i and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the Genera's Plan, and (b) chat the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the iistrict in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and ' (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detri,nenta' to the public health, safety or welfare -or materially injurious to p aperties or improvements it the vicinity. i 4 E: PLANNING COMMI`iSION RESOLUTION NC. OR 13564 AKINS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY N3VEKIER 14,1994 Page r: N. 3. Based upon the findings and conclyssions set forth it Paragraphs i and 2 above, th-s Commission hereby approves the apPliZation subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard ConditiT,s, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: 1. Catalog cuts on the false wood shutters shall be ;rovided Prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. A radirs cut shall be provided for the ends of all rafter tails. 3. Original references to pre -cast concrete trim as an accent on pot s+--lves shall be retained as shown on the plans reviewed by the Design Revie�r Committee on January 1d, 1990. 4. All pot sheiver on the Santa Barbara elevation types shall utilize pre -dast concrete trim. 5. Santa Barbara elev;r ion types shall be detailed with pre -cast concrete trim. S. The shelf on the Plan 1, Santa Barbara elevation, shall be provided on the rear under the window on the left side. 7. The depth of atl offsets shall be 12 inches minimum. 8. Some windows; on all four sides of all Santa Barbara elevation tyr.:z, shall be multi- paned. 9. Additional detailing shall be provided to the third car garage Of Plan 4 Monterey Gtyle elevation. _ 10. An additional reveal shvli be added to the right side of the Plan 4 Monterey style elevation. 11. On the; Plan 4 Santa Barbara Alevation typo (right Side), the offset shall be s mirin,um 12 inches in width. 12. On the Plan 6 Monterey elevation, French door] shall be added at the balcony window above the front door. 0. All corner lots shall be provided with eight 15-gallon trees minimum. 14. All interior lots shall be provided with four, 15- 9allon trees. � "51 F-I : PLANNING CUAMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 13564 - AKINS DEVELOPMENT` COMPANY NOVEMBER 14,1990 Page 3 15. Irrigation and turf shall be required on all gront and corner side yard lots. Slopes in corner side .ya..fi$ shall ' be landscaped with groundcover rather than turn. 16. All corner side yard walls and /or rear yard walls on through lots shall be located a ;ninimum 5 feet behind the sidewalk, where the sidewalk is property line adjacent. 17. Location and design of the nort). tract fencing and all other perimeter fencing shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prilir to thi+ issuance of building permits. Rancho Cucamonga Fire District; 1. This project will be required to comply with the provisions of the San Bernardino County Fire Safety Overlay District. (San Bernardino County Ordinance No. 3341.) Encineeriug Division: 1. All applicable conditions of Development Agreement 88 -•02 shall appjy. 2. G:idications for the construction of Wardman Bullock Road and "U" Street west" of the west tract boundary, to and includ'ng -a complete intersection of the two strec:: ,', shall be obtained prior to �ina'i Map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever o'tcurs fist. 3. "U" Street shall intersect Wardman Bullock Road as- near 'to 90 degrees (radial) as possible without so- rificing other street design standards. 4. The storm drain system within 'V' Street shall designed to minimize the possibility of overflow across, private property in the event of blockage in a catch basin, and /or a graded overflow path within a public easement shall be provided to the satisfaction 3f the Cit_v Engineer, S. Construct a permanent trapezoidal channel along the north tract boundary between Wardman Channel and the Morse Levee. 6. Provide a wall, which may include up to 1.5 feet ,nf freeboard, or other approved security fencing between he community trail, or private lot, and the channel servfce- road. Gr S� PLAN,Ir:G COMMISSION' RESOLUTION NO. OR 13564 - AKINS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY NOVEMBER 14,1950 Page 4 7, City maintained ',landscape areas on the e side of �`O " Street shall ;xtend to the tops of Slopes outside B` Perimeter Q,ll. The width shall be variable, with a minimum _- 12 feet when the adjacent lot slopes away from the street. 8. City ;maintained slopes, whether in lettered lots or landscape easements, ::!gall be no greater than 3:1. 9. Provide street tree easements, 6 feet wide behind the sideway on all uul -de -sacs. 10, Intersection lines of sight shall be plotted on the grading and landscaping plan:, for the intersections of 110" Street with U Street and "E" Street with "A" Street. Toes of slopes and perimeter walls shall not encroach into the lines of sight, Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Traffic En;lineEr. 1.1. Driveways on the following corner lots shall he located as far from the intersection as possible (50 feet preferred) to min-;;nize conflicts between backing and blind right turning movements: a. Phase 2: Lots 1, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30, b. Phase 3: Lot., 1,, 8, 17 and 29, C. Phase 4: Lots 1, 17, 24 and 31; and d. Phase 5: Lots 13, 22 and 32. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 19mv. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO tiUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. Mcrii el, Chai rnan ATTEST• Brad Buller, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR 13564 AKINS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY NOVEMBER 14,1990 Page 5 qP 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Coms0ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning 'Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commi,sion held on the 14th day of November, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit- AYES: COMMISSI HERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: y f, 't f I' s3132ngg a gg °aSui M.2E 'a.acjIl- — �i"lr r~l x - $2'4J "$p3a 3a� §D "fig -z � ": 'd `3� -1:• ra- all 1 C w f s �7irlrr a^qu °� a 3,24 _$ .23 jig 1 IV A - i . Dry 0 b. JAI Y a � r E 7 F� 0 r! 13 a ~ Y M irpp� ills 3 = ='' N C !i Path 4° ��•�: •da�� + B i 'S= "Z.A• its 1 � WWW ®� ' w loci , 2 1 0 r! 13 tux •S-.e?- ,, -ti er aiU21 K. yY 22 3 - _iJ'l"�' w r O r ■ i3 R e°igc� 3 s��,. 3A rs;Y t 15 a a LES ;UyU: P +emu s "s aaYS R , H12 =4 a, 4 qg ft ma Wei 4q 303v aev� � @r JUM m mss' ®� O:IY �g r ZR� a `s sa;, _ Iza, 3a40 a% � •a 0.0 . — m w = s -s it $'phi it o :Ame Awe � H -at _3 ° ilk alsdi d YYY w= C � « St +� �a Y sit =?gym �r�A �N w s 8 -sct N y`• `N N •® p.rL°PM0-yS VPi ��`E� O O��s � w 7 1fy 4 Y 01 y+ Y fp ' f' ■ N Y �•° U • --p `° ®`o$ Oy,� Y` d�� ,yGF ;$fig Q�s6i lFO Y-I p'pg ;5� a�qM GGGGGa �I. N r�n.1 ao Ia Yy 'g +�i1 —q 38 •"I�.. IeM1 f°' ^gip w•"Y3' q�L�O�ip�"i"�Ln_$ � `�� —�� a� O'°yYt y G�a°a 9O ^a 0= Cba 6�OY ysy�a�`G OM 6.$`�� •'111��. tttjjjj�'�s �e�� Y Yea C M L i i y• V L— L yyL b t N� 9 • aa a I[ a yyyy�1ypp aO Ay {Mrs r b M�i` QMi i y LZ •ii`» ��SiL` 1f�r+ 3Z fH•«� �N Vim... iS— «�•�" $g "3 rail's •l s gas- iaY E �� =s w ciaiy '� "plii 2t is IL y - 188 L ® V M i S.N zu _ ! <t •1.1 �� 3 r� =i$Li aaYS am• aZ' NjL r � • y C *j a In Qr• — 14 it �Di� ai w � _�YO nr� Ip M� 4s +Y !is�tl ��• �� r•K�Y'� ��:� : ^e�� « iii• G tl rle. Ys'°• rtl ��gVi$S�a�i V. �.s [`.l�r t+0 m s r r s MGM °sw '<$ 0$�0 do a .9 TL m S'SA r • N < J N a W �i 4 Sc ♦�-S ��4 �.`�Ca JY A� d Pi .�L wrp + y~■ Y4 aV {yla �. y Mi �w yq iS71 io $ wippe Zaqq{a Vt y�y♦' Qf �'A4Lpf6aP aVi a. ya3 +�� » {'S ♦r,: G E r !} dye ua �M �aVVVe • Mt+.r p at U ! '� •{ as+ @1 �Mp i 23 Azid �pApUu✓3 «yip {$� G.�y{, N`9 oa,eM YLYY O ♦y�gM ii �i♦a��/ _Nfigt � I �jaY� y�� $� ti°i.�FiSMwaT 4is6Tw 1. yp'_Taa�� t }�wsii{� Lfb S in i� •i44 IA pY N G r, q 3 aii y 4w1t eAl► w t UN i Y g �•¢t{.. • R 1 '�' Y 4 its jay iMp 1% ��nq +O+ +1f VS�g USE s3a ial a lit sst _s Miq -411 2 it & r's Poi 2N. 15�z s fit M�� ya — f w M ! M 'll :a4 to r. rsa it. «v f f I Y imni, "IaII C +u ��Y�L ��= �� M Y, is �r�p.- �!• i xis :shge -�s M, 1L v' _ins a iw` e1 _ �3 I {.{ MM — yY 21"'1 � � M �O v � o ` w Silt A O O�d�s ^eVI�YL —`7 ■ aM 1 �+ Ms �• ►� y M`p 4♦ M J Y ® t Y+ Vr w P �N. •f UZZ M «�� r� t3 ►" w �. � i 3 �__ wai�.t`♦ J ��i �=e ; � }��; V� •i- 3 D u « y V -I ` NI �I •I %j� Y �s �g s a E3iw� ka s ills w�9 dSw�w. e' 3 � 5�.. � �� s• � "� ��lS ��s T - »mac 3sx% ;ill ike «s. ss In MA 131 a ZY7pj w f i 4b3 w — � Y . j, ip a iF x � Sat uts 11,za i -L 2f ?3 Ali I- AM W Lei saw v 3$ s s iu G+ c a v N Iq � -� � K A • N M] 0 L7 6 E N 1a!`. Y awv a:a e ° G °s s•.GM.$ �Y �1 ° Ya "•Y N ° f ` �.$C« • Y Esl3 ag �8s sue_ P s `3 1 �� _ 3 a a F j r N w �� 9 -i � �� a� �= as is � � � a€ pig ; ��••1�,g` "`: r_a ^__g Pp- .s is `•s�ryJ��3 �� it yZ�. •�� i� � �� =� t «s �D•5 a N� Zia tY w WYr`Lti H Y� « � a w SW R�M ^I I w� ^I I I • I � w� .�1 r� H� �I fI La a" $ Y V � g 3 •W $ V 4 2 a Y 2 N2 ygr s {j¢ ii Y \ N M « M c� $r V�� f _ _ra e K7i: W� : I 3g 21 F a 3 w VIM Y S « V E Wn <$ � w �I �Lo i S �•J $ �a r ur � r' vi r b su M � • —77II O Y r y �r�r w r A � ti a NS 1 r' vi r b re` i r. IL Hi ei0 .QV�± � V er� o N A O w^ a 2 D s i s 1 �tr Pit rd 12 VC S 2M a O t sY r a Y .ys ^. ti •S �~ iir �w � c w ^ • F � 1R S r = .• N r G) v El t 1 s� bi e N i e+ 21 o� p rs c� 0 � a U ! mm a ry y •. PL• 8 � i S63 is St S Y r) re` i r. IL Hi ei0 .QV�± � V er� o N A O w^ a 2 D s i s 1 �tr Pit rd 12 VC S 2M a O t sY r a Y .ys ^. ti •S �~ iir �w � c w ^ • F � 1R S r = .• N r G) v El t 1 21 IBM •• � a U ! mm i S63 is Pi } ti3 A i 1 r 0701 -0 � —� ll -14-90 .PC Agenda. of 6 0 0 November 12, 1990 Planning Commissioner The City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, 0a. 91730 Dear Commissioner, The Haven View Estates Homeoc - -ners Association Board of Directors have met with Steve Shepard, projec4 manager of M.J. Brock & Sons Inc., several timee regarding the five lots on Tackstem_and a request which was made to increase front on garages from 25% to 4078. Brock has mitigated our concerns with t)-^ five lots by �.reating a cul -de -sac thereby removing potential pvrk nv problems on Taokstem. Bock will require a variance in lot siz`s to accomplish this, which we hope you will grant. After much discussion the board agree6 that X3% front on garages' would be an acceptable compromise. We hope you will consider these recommoLdations and approve the cul- de-sac design with.the variance as well as the 33% front on garages. Respectfully, HAVEN VIEW ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Bruce Ann Hahn President 125 South Mountain Ave. Suite E Upland, CA 714/481 -41.31 Mailing Address: Box 1510 Upland, CA 91785 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: I. --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT November 14, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning CoaL scion Brad Buller, City Planner Beve ly Niss n, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT fi:'O VARIANCE 90 -08 -- BROCK - A request to reduce the minimum net average lot size from 22,500 to 21,935 square feet and to reduce the minimum lot depth of Lot 3 from 150 to 124 feet for a 40 lot subdivision on 25.9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located east of Haven Avenue and north of Ringstem Drive - APN: 0201- 121 -24. Related File: Tentative Tract 14771. ENVIPONMEM.L ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14771- BROCK - A residential subdivision of 40 single family -lots on 25.9 acres of land in the 4 ery Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), 'located east of Haven Avenue and north of Ringstem Drive - APN: 0201- 121 -24. Related File: Variance 90 -08. ABSTRACT: This is a combined report involving a Tract Map and a Variance application. After discussion of both items, the Commission should first act on the Variance. Should the Variance be denied minor modifications tr the Tract Map would be required. If the Varir-re is approved, the Map may be approved as pt•oposed. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Variance, Subdivision Map, and Conceptual Grading Plan, and Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 1.58 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: P dL'htE t• North - Los Angeles Bureau of ower an �g asemen , vacant land within the County. South - Single Family Residential; Very tow Residential (less tt-n 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant; Flood Control West - Single Family Residential; Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) I B & G' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -08 & TT 14771 - BROCK NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 2 II. D. General Plan Designations: N` Project site Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) North - Flood Co,,trol1Utility Corridor South - Very Law Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Flood Control /Utility Corridor West - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units user acre) E. Site Characteristics: The project is currently varant with slopes ranging from 5 -15 percent. A man -made levee for flood control purposes is located along the southern side of the site, north of Ringstem Drive and Tackstem Street. The site is bordered on the north by a Los Angeles Bureau of Power and Light easement, on the east by Flood Control District land, and on the south and west by Tract 12332 -2 (Haven View Estates) which is partially constructed. F. Background: Haven lriew Estates is a gate - guarded community developed with custom and semi - custom homes and private streets. The proposed project is located on a remainaer parcel within this gated immunity. Reference to the remainder parcel is made +n a recorded document titled "Developer Street Easement and Maintenance Agreement." This document grants the remainder parcel access for ingress /egress over the existing streets connecting to Haven Avenue and through the gates. ANALYSIS: A. General: This item has been continued from the September 26, 1990, Planning Commission "i eting. At that time, residents and members of the Haven View Estates Homeowner's Association voiced concern over the five lots (No. 1 -5) fronting Tackstem Street (see Exhibit "A"). The applicant had provided three alternatives to these five lots at the previous meeting; however, none were acceptable to. either staff or the Homeowner's Association. Since the time of the last Meeting, the applicant has worked with Planning and Engineering staff to devise an acceptable alternative for these five lots (see Exhibit "8' "). This alternative provides a cul -de -sac, offset 125 feet from Roar Court. Five lots are located along this street. G. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee veviewed the revised project on October la, 1990. The Committee did not approve the project due to the following concerns. AVolk PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -08 & TT 14771 BROCK NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page, 3 ti I. Engineering Division concerns with the gradient of "A" Court. 2. Protoypical house plotting Which encroached into required setback areas. A special Grading Committee meeting was held on October 26, 1990, to .•eview a revised grading plan. The Grading Committee approved the revisions subject to the conditions listed in the attached Resolution of Approval. C. Neighborhood Meetinq: A neighborhood meeting was held in October 16, 1990 see Exhibit "F" for list of attendees). The residents who were present approved of the alternate lot configuration. However, there is still. disagreement over the appropriate ratio of side -on garages to be privided'. The residents feel that 75 percent side -on and 25 percent front -on garages should be provided. (Condition No. 8 ` the attached Resolution notes this,) The applicant feels thAt this is an unreasonable amount of side -on garage;. It should be noted that Phase 1 of Tract 12332 (53 to s) was approved with 15 percent 'r'ront -on garages and Rha °,e ,2 (151 lots) was apprs:ed with 40 percent front -on garages. D. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewad the revised project on October 17, 1990, and approved it. It should be noted that the local equestrian trail along the north side of Ringstem Drive has been deleted. III. VARIANCE: The applicant is stili requesting two Variances in conjunction with the proposed subdivision of Tentative Tract 14771; however, they have b €�fl revised from the previous requests as follows. First, a Variance ^equest would allow the overall net average lot s.ze of the tract to be reduced from 22,900 square feet, as required by code, to 21,965 square feet. This is actually an increase over the previous Variance request. The slight increase i5 due to the addition of the cul -de -sac street ( "A° Court) in response to concerns regarding the design of the five lots which took direct access from Tackstem Street. The Second Variance request is to reduce the mialmum lot depth of Lot 3 from 'c'" feet to 124 feet. The west boundary of the site is irregular in €:cape and the requirement for the storm drain channel and the community trail along the north tract boundary in juxtaposition with the new cul -de -sac has made it difficult to ! meet required lot depth minimums. { Staff notes that the elimination of one of the five lots on "A" Court would also eliminate the need for a Variance. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -08 & TT 14771 - BROCK NOVEFB ER 14, 1990 Page 4 IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS In order for the Planning Commission to approve the Variance, the Development Code requ`res that the following findings must be made: 1. That the strict or literal interpretation of enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the orYoperty involved or to the intended use of the property r;iat do not generally apply to other properties in the same district. 3. That strict or literal interpretation of the specified regulations would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by owners of other properties in the same district. 1. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations of other properties classified in the same district. S. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. In order to approve the Tentative Tract Man, the Commission should also make the following findings: The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: Both items have been advertised in the Inland Valtev Daily Bulletin newspaper as a public hearing, the site has been posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the site. In addition, the Haven Viaw Homeowner's Association has been notified. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 80 -08 4 TT 14771 - BROCK NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 5 4 VII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct the public hearing to receive all input on the proposed Variance and Tentative Tract Map. If after considering all testimony, the Planning Commission can support the required findings, then adoption of tf;a attached Resolutions would be appropriate. If the Planning Commission cannot support the Variance, minor modifications to the Tentative Map will be necessary and the item should ,e continued with tae applicant's ccnsent f Resp ly submi d: Brad City P anner BB :BN :ml g AMIL I qP Attactments: Exhibit "A" - Tract Map, Original Proposal Exhibit "B" - Tract Map; Current Proposal Exhibit "4" - Site Utilization Map j Exhibit `A" - Site Plan i Exhibit "E" - Grading Alan Exhibit 'I " Neighborhood Meeting, List of Attendees (October 16, 1990) . Exhibit "G' - Letter From Applicant ('Variance INis ti f i cati on ) Exhibit "H" - Lot 3 ! Exhibit "I" Planning Commission Staff Report of J September 26, 1990 Exhibit '"d" Planning CQ-,PiSsion Minutes of Sepbember 26, 2190 Resolution of Approval for Variance 90 -08' Resolution of Approval with Conditions for Tentative r Tract 14172 It li A r a a m e q.CJ -6 r u U S i 0z a: m IN �a 10ti1m03 0001 a w P i ( (�_7 6 s v e Y K r c am 4 •ora�es arr+e e�tisa�.r.�� Q a. sd®eair ra [�+c a.er.a.anrr ol - - - - -� - - A b ffA%4 OWN •.1. tnncQ_ '_fir "got - -- - i,1�lE9tJQ�A .• 0 0/ 0 00 Im I� {, ' J 4' �i J (I �ti�RN�a Aaft PA 6 7yy T W H O Y rTir � � W jo TtT Ti i lu ri II --� e> 4"(�, 1 ct �]f ypV G � a ~ 3 W 1 2 W �w to K „v +i M CrrY CF RAI�QD CLJCAMsGA mu: ftywam IN6 (Jdff-,Al-rr PLANNM D +, ., 1 - JZA i am_._ 1IJ_ -1; - �¢S,IL r variance Justifications for Tentative Tract 14771 Variance A) Ta allow the overall net lot average of Tract 14771 to be 21,965 square feet where 22,500 square feet is required, a reduction of 535 square feet (13.37 square feet per lot). The subject property contains 25.35 gross acres of land. A total of 40 lots, with a minimum area of 20,056 square feet, are proposed. The net acreage of the site is 20. .7 (less from gross acreage, 2.61 acres for streets, .94 acres for the community trail and 1.63 acres for the drainage channel) for an overall average lot size of 21,965 square feet. Achieving a net average. lot size of 22,500 square feet on this site is difficult due to the drainage channel improvements that have become a requirement of this tract. The channel is 34 feet wide and extends the entire length of the site. Without the channel improvements, the site would contain 21.8 net acres and a 23,740 square foot lot average could be obtains". The site was originally designed with a V -Ditch to carry storm flows along the northerly property line. This design was to be consistent with the design of Tract 12332 -2. Because the concrete drainage channel Is now a requirement of this tract, 1.63 acres of buildable acreage is lost. The requirement of a drainage channel along the northern boundary of this site is an exceptional circumstance and is not consistent with the design of other properties in the area. Additionally, the Tract has been redesigned to allow for the 20 foot wide community trail to parallel the drainage channel along the northern boundary. The trail contains .94 acres in this configuration. The previous design with the trail extending along the southerly Tract boundary within the right -of -way and extending north through the site contained .68 acres. This redesign resulted Zn a .26 acre loss of buildable area. In response to concerns regarding the design of the site with 5 lots taking direct access from Tackstem Street, the site has been redesigned with an additional cul -de -sac (`A* Court), which has resulted in additional loss of .28 acres of buildable area and decreasing the ovarall net lot average. The requested variance to allow an overall lot average of 21,965 square feet is a 2.371 reduction from the required 22,500 square foot lot average. The proposed average doe3 fat compromise the character of the surrounding developments. All lots are over 20,000 square feet and several lots greatly exceed the minimum. The site is in conformance with the General Plan and generally meats all other requirements of the Development Code. As designed the site is safe and functional and will be complimentary to the other developments in the area. E variance B) To allow the minimum lot depth on Lot I of Tentative Tract 14771 to be 124 feet where 150 feet, as measured from the midpoint of the lot, is required. The west boundary of TT -14771 is irregularly configured. Due to the required storm channel and community trail along the northern boundary of the site, the depth on this 4ide of the project site has been reduced by 54 feet. Additionally the design of this area ties been revised to include a standard cul- de-ssc in response to concerns regarding direct access from the 5 lots in 'chit area to Tackstem Street, further reducing the lot depth in this area, As a result of these design modifications to the tract, Lot 3 does not meat the minimum required lot depth. Lot 3, as designed with 124 feet of depth at the midpoint is a viable lot and a single family residencg,, comparable in size to existing homas within iiavenview Estates can be positioned on the lot and setbacks maintained. With the lot depth variance, the design of the tract is consistent with the General Plan and Lot 3 as proposed is in keeping with the character of the developing neighborhooA. loc.. rq� E, r r i 3461" `s•1 S.F. 21041.58 $ d P. 3p of �m7s ` 'S. 9 >9 36.71 u� L { 1 -j202Z193 S.F 0000........... T t6lss 23756.75 y 9 $ Mls—,, I I 20180.96 S.F. 1 207.53 t 7 \ \ 20288.25 S.F. Jf �A6 EASE 6 20683 15 S.F. 74 17j q ewt NORTH CITY CF i PLANNING DIVISM EXHIBIT ..� _ CCALS c F1.000 CONMCL (DRAINAGE CHANNEL) LOT `A 71OZ5.12 S .,'ACCESS EASEUV4T M eeira6' ¢ 746.42 (CQMMUNITY TRA`) LOT 'g' 41019. 133.7Y .�s7.10 �.i3',9�! e a 16464 A' �Q1 ti & 2 a 1 15" LOCAL TWA!L e 21462.49 2022 S.F. EASELENT v 10 ��\k�►ar. N a '? i a .7 t f 28094.66 ; C loc.. rq� E, r r i 3461" `s•1 S.F. 21041.58 $ d P. 3p of �m7s ` 'S. 9 >9 36.71 u� L { 1 -j202Z193 S.F 0000........... T t6lss 23756.75 y 9 $ Mls—,, I I 20180.96 S.F. 1 207.53 t 7 \ \ 20288.25 S.F. Jf �A6 EASE 6 20683 15 S.F. 74 17j q ewt NORTH CITY CF i PLANNING DIVISM EXHIBIT ..� _ CCALS c a. e ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14771 - BROCK - A residential subdivision of 40 single family lots on .:5.9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) located east of Haven Avenue and north of Ringstem Orive - APN: 0201- 121 -2 {. Related file: Variance 90 -08. ABSTRACT- This is a combined report involving a Tract Map and a Variance �plication. Alter discussion of both items, the Commis; quid first a „t on the Variance. Should the Variance be den. 'nor modifications to the Tract Flap would be required. — tie Variance is approved, the Map can be approved as - proposed. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: 1. Approval of a Variance, 2. Approval of the Subdivision Map, and Conceptual Grading Plan, and 3. Issuan4-. of a Negative Deelaratioc. B Pro3ect Density- 1.58 dwelling units per acre. It If CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT i DATE: September 26, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 90 -08 - BROCK - A request to reduce the minimum net ave ^age lot size From 22,500 to 22,162 square feet and to reduce t`1e minimum lot depth of Lot 1 from ISO to 124 feet for a 40 1 o subdivision on 25.9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located east of Haven Avenue and north of ,'ngstem Drive - APN: 0201- 121 -24. Related File. Tentative Tract 14771. A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14771 - BROCK - A residential subdivision of 40 single family lots on .:5.9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) located east of Haven Avenue and north of Ringstem Orive - APN: 0201- 121 -2 {. Related file: Variance 90 -08. ABSTRACT- This is a combined report involving a Tract Map and a Variance �plication. Alter discussion of both items, the Commis; quid first a „t on the Variance. Should the Variance be den. 'nor modifications to the Tract Flap would be required. — tie Variance is approved, the Map can be approved as - proposed. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: 1. Approval of a Variance, 2. Approval of the Subdivision Map, and Conceptual Grading Plan, and 3. Issuan4-. of a Negative Deelaratioc. B Pro3ect Density- 1.58 dwelling units per acre. It If PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -nS F TT 14771 BROCtf SEPTEMBER 2e. 1990 Page 2 d i C. Surroundina Land Use and Zoning: North - C.A. Bureau of Power and Light Easement, vacant land ° withiv the Court.- South - Singl Famil,! Residential, Very Law Residential East (less d acant; Flood Control units pe* acre) West - Single Family Residential; Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) j D ,-al Plsn Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential 'less than 2 dwelling units oer acre) North - Flood Control /utility Corridor South - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East Flood Contrel /Utility Corridor West - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units pur acre) E. Site Characterisiids: The project site is currently vacant with slopes ranging from 5 -15 percent. A man -made levee for flood control purposes is located along the southern side of 0e site, north of Rinastem Drive and Tackstem Street. The site is bordered an the north by a Los Angeles Bureau of Dower and Light easement, on the east by Flood .Control District land, cind on the south and west by Tract 12332 -2 (Haven View Estates) which is partially constructed. F. Backaround: Tracts 12332 and 12332 -2 are located to the south and west of this tract and consist of 204 lots, ranging is size from 20,000 to 44,000 square feet. Both phases of Tract 12'332 were approved with private streets. Haven View Estates is a gate- guarded commuaity developed with custom and semi- custom homes.. The proposed project is located on a remainder parcel within this gated co =unity. Re'�Mrenre to this remainder parcel is made in a recorded dacLment titled "Developer Street Easement and Maintenance Agreement." This document grants the remainder parcel access for ingri3s /egress over the existing streets connecting to Haven Avenue and tnrough the gates. 11. ANALYSIS: A. Caneral: The applicant; is proposing a 40 lot subdivision, with lots ranging in size from 20,06!? to 31,498 square feet. The average lot size is 22,162 square feet. The applicant is also requesting a variance to reduce the minimum average lot size frOm 22,800 to 72,162 square feet, and to reduce the minim!% lot depth on Lot No. 1 frog 150 to 120 feet. i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -08 & TT 14771 - BROCK SEPTEMBER 26. 1998 Page 3 AINk The site contains nat,iral grades from 10 -15 percent and thus falls within the area required to comply with the Hillside's Grading Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to utilize a sloping pad concept which is intended to minimize grading as much as possible. This is consistent with the existing grading concept within Haven View Estates. Prototypical lot grading and layout schemes have been submitted which indicate that split level foundations will be provided. B. Trails Advisor sr Committee: The Committee reviewed the project on July 18, 1990 and did not approve it in its original configuration which had the community trail located along the south tract boundary. The Committee had the following comments on the trail layout: 1. A 20• -fo;,t community trail should be continued along the north Von of the tract abutting Lot "A ". 2� A 15 -foot local feeder trail should he substituted for the community trail at the east side of Lot 5. I ' 3. A local feeder trail should continue along the east side of Tackstem Street to the north side of Ringstem Drive. 4. The local feeder trail should match the existing adjacent tract feeder trail and continue along the north side of Ringstem Drive from the east side of Tackstem Street to the easterly tract boundary. Check the width of existing local trail easemct:ts. 5. North/south 'local trails should be provided at the rear of the lots between "Ap Court and "B" Court, be'.ween "B" Court and Paddock Drive, and along the interior side of the easterly tract boundary. All of these local trailT r would connect the local trail along Ringstem Drive with the community trail along the northern tract boundary. 6. The community trail at the north edge of the tract should have a garden w.. "l on the south side of the 12 -foot service road and the standard white PVC fence on the south side of the community trail adjacent to the lots. The applicant revised the plans in order to meet all the above criteria except for #3 noted above. The applicant feels that this portion of the trai is- unnecessary and would like this matter discussed by the full Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -08 b TT 14771 - BROCK y SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 4 C. Neighborhood Meeting_ A neighborhood meeting was conducted'_, on August 13, ,1990, regarding the project. The residents voiced concern mainly with the five lots which front onto Tackstem Street. They feel it would be dangerous to have cars backing out onto this street and they also noted that in only two cases in Tract 12332 do lets front onto Ringstem Fr Tackstem. The applicant indicated that they Yould be' agreeable tG a conditions which provided some type of mitigation measure such as hammerhead or circular driveways. Concern was also expressed by residents regarding traffic impacts with the additional 40 lots. They feel that the traffic impact would be too great and that a second, fully improved access to the east should be provided, rather than the emergency access indicated. Exhibit "A" provides notes from the meeting and the list of attendees. A second Neighborhood Meeting was conducted nn September 4, 1990. Concern regarding the lots which front onto Tackstem Drivq was reiterated. It was felt that this will encourage on- street parking, which is prohibited by the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC &Rs) within the existing subdivision. Additional concerns regarding the need for a variance for minimum average lot size was ex1iressed by the resident. Residents also indicated that thej did not want any garage doors facing Tackstem or Ringstem and that the number of front -on garages should be limited to 25 percent. At the September 4, 1990, meeting the developer provided a traffic study to answer some of the residents concerns. The I- ultimate traffic volume, including Tracts 12332, 14771, and potential future development of 53 iddlZional lots within the Flood Control District property to the east, was calculated to he 3,110 daily trips on Ringstz-- Orive and 590 daily trips on Tackstem Street. City policy considers streets to be functioning as collectors once they carry 1,500 tripe a day. Therefore, lots should not front onto Ringstem Ori .,. According to Traffic Engineering, the maximum volume which car be accommodated on two -lane road (28 feet wide, excluding parking) is 10,000 daily trips. Staff met with the applicant again on September 14, 1950, at which time the applicant presented three different scenarios which would limit the frost -on 'lots on Tackstem Street (see Exhibit '"C °). The first alternative provided a private driveway in front of hots 1 -5, with only one access point onto Tackstem. The second alternative provided a private drivewav to the rear 0 1,lts 1 -5, with no access onto Tackstem. The third d.�:rnatiwe, provided a modified PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -08 b TT 14771 BROCK SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 5 cul -de -sac off of Tackstem Street. None of the three... alternatives were acceptable to Planning or Engineering, staff for reasons of ran- comformity with existing City standards. L. Design Review Come: ttee: The Committee (Melcher, Weinberger, Coleman reviewed. the project on August_ 16 1990,. and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. Lots 1 -5 should be provided with either hammerhead or circular driveways to preclude vehicles backing out onto Tackstem °Street. This should be depicted on any future Design Review submittals or single family plan checks. This stipulation should also be contained in the CCARs. 2. This submittal should conform to all provisions of the Hillside Development Ordinance (Section 17.24 of the Development Code). 3. Split level pads, stem walls, and varying floor levels should be incorporated on any future Design Review and single family plan check submittals in order to minimize grading. E. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed and accepted the proposal on August 14, 1990, subject to the additional conditions listed in' the attached Resolution of Approval. F. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the proposal on August 13, 1990, and approved it on August 23, 1990. III. VARIANCE: The applicant is requesting two variances in conjunction with the proposed suodivision of Tentative Tract 14771. The first r ?quest is to allow the overall net average lot_ N1ze of the tract to be reduced from 22,500 square feet, as required by code, to 22,162 square feet. '.he applicant feels that achieving the required net average lot size would be difficult because of the requirement of a drainage . channel along the north tract boundary. With the requirement 'of the drainage channel, 1.73 acres of buildable land has been lost. Without the channel requirements a 24,186 square foot average lot size cou% be achieved. The site was originally designed with a v- ditch to carry storm flows along the northerly property boundary, which would be consistent with the existing adjacent Tract 12332 -2. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -08 & TT 14771 - BROCK SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 6 IV. Additionally, the applicant notes that the community trail has been rnlocated from the north side of Tackstem to the northerly tract ;toundary on the recommendation of the Trails Advisory Committee. The original design of the trail contained .68 acres of dedication, while the revised design contained .95 acres of dedicated land. This has resulted in an additional loss of .27 acres of buildable area. The second Variance request is to reduce the minimum lot depth of Lot 1 from 150 feet to 120 feet. Lot 1 is a triangular shaped parcel that contains 25,178 square feet, which exceeds the required minimum lot size and the required minimum average lot size. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to approve the Jariance, the Development Code requires that the following findings must be made: 1. That the s`rIct or literal interpretation of enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary t3rcumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not generally apAly to other properties in the same district. 3. That strict or literal interpretation of the specified regulations would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by owners of other properties in the same district. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations of other properties classified in the same district. _ 5.' That tke granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. In order to approve the Tentative Tract Mat, the Commission should alfA make the following findings: The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. [a, L StAFF otm`enta, Vg0MgER 26. 1g90 hLS c009 ' gATO ss�a °n u1A be pa9 Staff advers • in9 CA air ion MEN: ifiCA by Qtanne De4}ar nL�ASSESS no si(l Lf t. ,iegati� Ved• tn�and pNM� fou res3ectee of a �s aPPro in the it Eli f this P;ssua tract rtised fibs s vMers V • Ca e a e e5� f i fdtestenrat ;des bade ba poti tc e �An the e.a en View h vlit aPPr OPri atoENpE • 1 e ; n oe* ha a beenjne a a i t; on, po i ssi ed E golk But tices its• tifae in9. r°P °s V1 • Vpa le ,posted an t n °f �hhg§ been no that the put °n t ;aerin9 iY d been i� 300 Associati0 coendsei�e a >> after Cons the re 1d be tf .Aomeowner s Staff in9 to r%aP• ca 5Ue Alu' °nsla ort the he ENOAtIpN�b�ie bear �e fraccNnissi °ntachea RecannOt pi,, REppMM t the P centat n ;n9 p0 the at ;ssi0n tige Map Vii• c0 fiance and the paoPt.on 1a nin9 t o the yenta Vies a nos 9 hen tf pdi f ati ons { :.�,saPria;inor m , ti R sPectta/� ( s u� er t in9 NOt is% ° A d %yeti n9 grad p1 nner ehO °d Me gp, and hb0rhoo City p A° . Ne A t L ndees at 90.9 B9 :BN •m� 9 s Exhibit a . List cfeP We" of Lay � uts Attachment Exhibit 6 1t Cnati station aP a utiz apt h ;bit • - Siteative �r plan Exhibit• - sae PJ an LandscaP p1 an i ance habit a . S� tub ding Var i. Ex it F .. poNeeP a� Nea lieant l Exhibit .G• p °nceQ 4rOa' AP al to ;ve exhibit tw - Le Ju tificati0 nce 9p "p4 r gen t Exhibit • i3Ot 1 vai for ' v r diti°ns fO Rxe o�u ' o °o APpP oval v�it� GIN es ra t vidl- v sa. DATE: August 13, 1990 TO: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner FROM: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14771 (BROCK) Attendees: Beverly Nissen, City of Rancho Cucamonga Steve Shepard, Brock Homes Trent Pulliam, oh:ck Homes Phil Douglas, Associated Engineers KattA een Hill, Associated Engineers A short introduction to the project was n° gaited by Steve Shepard of Brock Homes. After this, questions were taken from the audience. Following is a summary of thor concerns. 1. Residents were i:onsierned with the width of Tackstem Street. They noted that Pv parking was currently permitted on the existing portion of Tackstem. The engineer indicated that the road width would remain the same to be consistent with the existing project (Tract 12332 -2). 2. Residents were concerned with the placement of tm- houses on the lots. It was indicated to them that the t,o0e placement was conceptual only. 3. Concern was expressed regarding the five lots which front onto Tackstem. They felt it would be dangerous to have cars backing out onto Tackstem due to the curve of the street. They also - noted that the existing tract does not have any lots which front onto Tackstem. Trent Pulliam (Brock Names) indicated that they would be willing to provide mitigation measures such om ::ynage, hammerhead driveways, or circular driveways. Mr. Pulliam also indicated that all preliminary layouts for this remainder parcel showed lots fronting onto Tackstem. The residents, howaver, were still uncomfortable with front -ons along Tackstem. 4. Concern was also expressed by residents regarding traffic impacts with an additional 40 lots. They felt that the traffic impact would be too great and that a second, fully improved, access to the east should - be provided, rather than the emergency access indicated. ?C �j IT "A" MEETING MINUTES FOR TT 14771 August 13, 1990 Page Z S. Some residents were concerned with size and the s z a price range of t the homes that will be bviit on the proposed lots, It was explained, that homes are not being proposed at this time. Representatives from JCC Development indicated that their houses would be in the range of 5,200 - 5,800 square feet. Brock indicated that any proposed houses would probably be comparable h totis. 6. Several residegt= were concerned with any new lots being provided access through their gate and private streets. They felt this would lesssn their property values and they wouldn't have bought their lk \ts if they knew theta was going to be additional lots in the`.area. cc: Betty Miller, EngineerinS BH /jfs 77r I4- 7s N ei An-/ Meek' o. C_ :z� y C'27es4 h6re ISO - L r7 s 2� j 4YMA i XU �a► � c 7r c.4 �/.0 G� �iww s 9. ��° -��he y8?: X20 ,-e a r roer �, �i °�.rz11 W77 ��lSt /fod VEirnrst�0 T�� L�� •�4� - zr/fddf- R•. ep '?oz: 1'7 it l.�} �j -%E-{� S1l1LP'At�D c(�zarsac.� �33$O Slk�.tsf C�a� • �'�S !t S5'� �ot'6 too i o. C_ :z� y 1 UP wolro MrQ S �/ rr 41 ?1 Z. -Aelc hL Z, f'i% AW7 -24,1 ' su s J�Itc.. AAja °L , / [! �rnee-n v� YA Diu i v a4, o o14 :� h W �W r J u i Ito // J Ito ' im '- *j 1 ' a F cxc3 w 0 co as W U } ,q Z :t cl W I Ip Y r J u i Ito // J Ito ' im '- *j 1 ' a F cxc3 w 0 co as W U } ,q Z ,ft � Iv� AN x SOL Z W y NP r 1� I c 0 T 10 'l 9 f I - s 1 ! o® ILI tu Af 0 h�. �Rm 0 o l n fx D q -Nut �".g ' i !3� 1� le RVAP ,till [ r r, A ^� aj Q �s e %Z� �BD it I a wi'�i.faS112i.. ICAL sl. OL J- 747.7 7 9KTIdN •4•A• A 1 ti s V V NMH CI'T'Y CF rmm.. °('`t' 14171 PLANNM DWSM EXHIBIT- _. SCALE- 11 MY '. RANCHO m O EPLANNING E • ►1JL�ri;!i pr ; E J E' E CITY CF MEM, n ANNiNG DIVA EXHIMT= '-3 SCALE= I Variance Justifications for Tentative Tract 14771 Variance A) To allow the overall no,_ lot average of Tract 14771 to be 22,162 square foat where 22,500 square fast is required, a reduction of 338 square feet (8.45 square foot per lot). The subject propertty contains 25.33 gross acres of land. A total of 40 lots, with a minUn a area of 20,083 equare foot, are proposed. The not acreage of the sits is 20.35 (losa from gross acreage, 2.32 acres for streets, .45 acres for the community trail and 1.73 acres for the drainages channel) for an overall average lot size of 22,162 square fact. Achieving a net average lot size of 22,500 square feet on this site ;a difficult duo to the' drainages channel improvements that have become a requirement of This tract. The channel. is 34 feet wide and extends the would contain of the site. Vithout the channel improvements, the sitoi could contain ed.21 net acres and a 24,186 square foot lot avQre6,a could be obtained. The site cam originally designed with a V.Ditch to carry etor fl s m oc along the northerly property* lira. This design was to be consistent with the design of Tract 12332-2. Because the concrete drainage channel is now a requirement of this tract, 1.73 acre's of buildable acreage is lost. The requirement of a drainage channel along the northern boundary of this site is an exceptional circumstance and is not consistent with the design of other properties in the asna. Additionally, the Tract has been redesigned to all— for the 20 foot wide community trail to parallel the drainage channel along the northern boundary. The trail contains The previous design with the 45 acres in this configuration. e trail extending along, the southerly 'Tract boundary within the right -o$ -way and extending north through the site contained .68 acres. This redesign resulted in a .27 acre loss buildable area. The requested varisnce foot is to allow an overall lot average of 22,162 square less than a fern percent (20) reduction from the required 22,500 square foot lot average. The proposed overage does not compromise the character of the surrounding developments. All lots are square feet: and spvo avas 20.000 ral lots greatly exceed the minimum. site is ova in conformance with the General plan and he nests all ether requirements of the Development Cods, As designed the site is safe and functional end rill be complimentary to the other developments in the area. 11 (Variance b) To allow the minimum lot depth on Ltt f of Tentative Tract 14771 to be 120 feat where 150 feet, as &r asurcd from the midpoint of the lot. is required. tot 1 is an irregularly shaped lot that contains 2S,178 square feet. As proposed the depth at the midpoint of the lot is 120 feet duo to its "pia shaped* configuration. If the triangular area of this lot was to be made into a separate common open space lot, lot 1 would meat the minimum depth requiremant without reducing the lot area to less than 20,000 square feet. By maintaining the lot in the proposed configuration, a larger more derivable lot is created and the area can be maintained by the homeowner. Additionally, to assure.appropriste development of this lot s condition stating the setbacks and location and height for fencing can be placed in the GCzz,9 f -t this lox. The overall design of the tract is consistent'vith the General Plan and Lot I as proposed vill''be in keeping with the character of the developing neighborhood. - - - -- - -W• - --I LA. nl'!'Y. OF LJ®w Am Pow9p ' L.- 5i u c -z5, CrrY RANCHO CUCANIONGA OF --TT—L4171 rrcrar= �� KANNING exvc v Fxrarerr= Z__.., sCAU= �vf,l-S8 z E Ll L"^A� 4110 1. D VVjJ 1.TQT1- fo emptions, unless the City Council adds Itxemptions, which t when t eview it. Motion: Move Chi ti ea, seconded by Toistoy, to a the Resolutions recommending approv of "Environmental Assessment an toria Commut.ity Plan Amendment 90 -02 and E onmental Assessment a _rra Vista Community Plan Amendment 90 -01, as writte ith the revisio o Exhibit A on the Terra Vista Community Amendment 90 -01. Mo carrie the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIE EL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 000HER, WEINBE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS NONE carried Commissioner Melctprstated he did not recall the proje n Terra Vista but the project i ictoria had been brought to the Planni Commission for approval; a ecause of objection:; raised, the developer ha en making a good fai effort to rea sign the project to make it accep a to the imnedi community. He felt it was unfair to subject that p ect to poli al pressure at this time. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 90 -08 - BROCK - A request to reduce the minimum net average lot size from 22,500 to 22,162 square ftiet and to reduce the minimum lot depth of Lot 1 from 150 to 120 feet for a 40 lot subdivision on 25.9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre; located east: of Haven Avenue and north of Pingstem Drive - APN: 020.- 121 -24. Related file: Tentative Tract 14771. M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14771 - ROCK - A residential subdivision of 40 single family lots on 25.9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) located east-of Haven Avenue and north of Ringstem Drive - APN: 0201 - 121 -24. Related file: Variance 90 -08. Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Steve Shepard, Brock Homes, 3380 Shelby Street, Ranchn Cucamonga, thanked staff for their work on the project. He said he had integrated comments from staff and surrounding residents and he felt the development was compatible with the neighborhood. He stated their traffic engineer had submitted reports substantiating than the project was well within the parameters regarding street traffic. He said alternaTives had been submitted for Lots 1 -S, the Planning Commission Minutes -17- September P6, 1990 001101 r houses fronting on Tackstem, but none of the a:iternatives woult! work. He rersuested that the equestrian trail not be required along Ringstem because there is an existing trail on th3 south side of Ringstem and the remainder of is Ringstem has an equestrian trail only on one side of the street, not both-, He asked that the number of permitted front -on garages be changed to GO percent instead of the indicated 25 percent, in order to bE consistent with what had been approved on a previous tract. He state) that requiring FEMA response to remove :he Zone AO designation prior to final map recordation would be a hardship because he felt FEMA does not respond that q0 c kly, therefore, he requested that the Conditional Letter of Map Revision by required only prior to issuance of building permits. He stated his consultants were available to answer any questions. /:!+?i rvian McNlc1 asked how they felt about to results of the ne.: ,iborhood meetings. Mr. Shepard stated he felt they had mitigated some of their concerns. He said they had agreed to provide on -site turnarounds for Lots 1 -5 so that traffic exiting to Tackstem could head out. Bruce Ann Hahn, 5087 Granada Court, Rancho Cucavinga, stated the basic issue was the five driveways fronting onto Tarkstem. She said in the entire tract there are only two driveways fronting onto Taciistem and none onto Ringstem. She stated that the CC &Rs restrict parking on Tackstem and Ringstem and she felt if driveways were placed on Tackstem, it could encourage guests to park on the street. She said that because it is a private community, enforcement is up to the homeowners. Ms. Hahn stated that Tackstem is steep aad she felt parked cars could pose a safely pr�iblem. She suggested that the Commission could perhaps approve the project minus the five lots in question. She showed a proposed layout that wou'A avoid driveways fronting onto Tackstem. She said the Homeowners' Associatior. >t,.d hav;; to live with whatever is approved, so she felt it would be fair for the Commission to delay the applicant a short time in order tN be sure the dri,&Aay and parking issues were properly mitir red. Sh_ ..,-� the homeowners did not have any obje.tion to the Variance. request. She stated that the Homeowners' Association has an "Associat,ort Street Easement and Maintenance Agreement," which states that the the Asseciation will cooperate �O th Brock in ar. effort to annex the Brock property as it is developed in or,;r to merge the two developments. She stated that wound be easier if the developments are consistent in their &:,:sign. She said that the agreements call for access through the gates and the traffic report states there will be 3,100 car trips out of Ringstem on a daily basis. She questioned if the gates can accommodate such a large number of operations,, or if a new gate would be needed. She was concerned because currently Brock is paying for they gate maintenance but the Homeowners' Association wil "i eventually be paying. Ms. Hahn stated that in their development their architectural coiamittee does not like front -on garages, and tries to elim*tniate them wherever pos0h11e. She said that Brock would not be building the houses but is planning to sell off the lots to individuals and asked if that meant the first 25 people would be entitled to front -on garages. Planning Commission Minutes .13- September 26, 1990 �yD Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that when a single lot project is processed it is reviewed by staff and staff would try to use good judgment to ensure that the front -on garages are spread throughout the project, not clustered in one area. Ms. Hahn stated their main concern is to keep the tracts consistent. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if Ms. Hahn had presented her proposed lot design to the developer, Ms. Hahn s-splled that in the neighborhood meeting she «ad asked if Roan Court could be flipped, and she was told it could net. Al Seguy, 4942 Cactus Court, Rancho Cucamonga, was concerned that an earthquake might limit access to or from the tract if Haven Avenue were not passable. He requested that another way out of tike tract be provided. Mr. Shepard stated that a total of four lots currently take access off Tackstem or Ringstem and currer'' i there is no parking an the north side of Tackstem. He reported that Br, , currently maintains the gates, which have worked effectively for years with no problem. He indicated the cost per homeowner would be less in the future because the maintenance cost would be spread over a grE)ter number of homeowners. Mr. Shepard stated there are two different ways to exit the project, stemming off Haven Avenue. He said they had studied the alternative proposed by Ms. Hahn and it would not work. AML Bruce Shaffer, Associated Engineers, 9259 Utica Avenue, Raocho Cucamonga, stated they had studied a number of alternatives for the fiva lots fronting onto Tackstem. He said they s "adied an alternative emulating what the neighborhood w.:z requesting and ti,? City Engineering Department would not support the concept. He said it resulted is sub - standard Lots, which would require a variance. Commissioner Chitiea asked if the cul -de -sac Mould work if one lot were deleted. Mr. Shaffer said the deficiency was not only a function of lots not meeting standards, but also a feactlon of streets meeting standards. - Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that generally Engineering does not like four -way into -se%.ions on local streets, but in this case it may be acceptable because they did not anticipate a lot of through traffic. Mr. Shaffer stated that sce.iario did not take the trail system and drainage into account, so it would mean a loss of two lots. Ar. Hanson stated that after a quick look, Engineering felt probably four lots could be accommodated in the area. Ms. Hahn stated that two of the four lots currently fronting onto Tackstem have their front doors facing cul -de -sac street:, with guest parking available on the cul -de-sacs. Flann'ng Commission Minutes -14- September 26, 1990 Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing, Commissioner Chitiea asked Mr. Coleman to address the trail issue. Gan Coleman, Principal Planner stated he felt the Trails Committee was thinking that the trail running alons the north side of Ringstem was to provide a riding loop. He said the trail on the south side would provide sufi'icient access. Commissioner Melcher stated he found the residents' argum-snts against allowing driveway access from Tackstem to be compelling. He felt that four lots on a cul -de -sac could be accommodated and he thought that may alleviate the need for a variance. Commissioner Chitiea concurred._ She also felt providing a loop trail would be appropriate, and she supported the Trails Commitcee's recommendation to require a trail on the north side. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed on the trail, ,tating the Trails Committee would like to see a loop system. He did not lake the five -lot configuration and felt a redesign containing four lots and a cul -de -sac, would be more appropriate. Commissioner Weinberger concurred and stated she did not wrist to see the number of front -on garages increased. Commissioners Taistoy and Chitiea agreed regarding the garages. Commissioner Chitiea was concerned that the gate hiay experience problems with the increased use. Chairman MCNiei agreed that to allow driveways to take access from Tackstem would be compounding inconsistencies with the streetscape. He felt an alternative may be achievable without losing a lot. He suggested that the item be continued to allow the applicant to consider alternate layouts. He then reopened the public heiriag. Mr. Shaffer asked when the item could return to the Planning Commission if it were continued. Mr. Buller asked if the number of lots changed and the application for the Variance were changed, if the item would have to be readvertised. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorry, responded that if the design resulted in no need for a variance, then there would be no need to rEadvertise. Mr. Coleman stated that it was po65ibie that a redesign could result in different variances being required in terms of lot depths, widths, or sires. Ralph Hanson stated that if a different variance were needed, then such a variance request would have to be advertised. Planning Commission "mutes -15- September 26, 11390 %L Mr. Buller recommended that the item be continued for four weeks to allow renoticing with a new title. Mr. Shaffer said they were willing to consent to a continuance. He asked fer the Commission's opinion with regard to his request to require the Conditional Letter of Map Revision on FEMA only prior to the issuance of building permits. Barrye Hanson stated that the request did not conflict with an Ordinance, but rather an Engineering policy, He said the condition as written is how it has been applied to all other projects during the l: t year or so. He said staff does not know there will be a problem with FEMA, and feels that the final map is the point at which the City has the most control over the situation. He said they would like to get the situation resolved with the entire tract at one time, because tiie City might be the faced with the possibility of phasing and involving individual homeowners, as it will be a custom lot project. He said it was staff's preference that the condition be kept as written. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Tolstoy, tr1 continue Environmental Assessment and Variance 90 -08 and Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 14771 to October 24, 1990.. Motion carried by the following voter AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY`, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE' ABSENT COMMISIONERS: NONE - carried -,,requesz Lo ameno tine uenerai Plan Land Use Map from Flood ControlOU ity C6rr4gor to Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) for 1.9 acres contai within two parcels of land located north and so . of an extension ighland Avenue, adjacent to the east side of Cucamonga Creek Channel. Planning Commission will also consider• en Space and Very Low Residentia less than 2 dwelling units per e) as possible land use alternatives. 201 - 200 -37 and 1062 -640 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ELOPMENT ICT AMENDMENT 90 -01 - SHERWjOD - A requesx to amend th ev ent Districts Map from "FC" Flood Control to "L" Low Residenti -4 dwelling units per acre) for 1.92 acres contained within two Geis o nd located north and south of an extension of Highland nue, adjacent the east side of the Cucamonga Creek Channe he Planning Commissio 11 also consider "OS" Oper; Space and "V " ery Low Residential (less than welling units per acre as possi and use alternatives. APN: 201 - 200 -3r 1062- 640 -57. Vince Be -, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. 5pinM fRe p0glic Planning Commission Minutes -16- September 26, 1990 RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF TNF PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIF NIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 90 -08 A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM NET AVERAGE LOT SIZE FROM 22,500 TO 21,935 SQUARE FEET AND TO Rr DUCE THE MINIMUM LOT DEPTH OF LOT 3 FROM 150 TO 124 FEET FOR A 40 LOT SUBDIVISION ON 25.9 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND NORTH OF RI3GSTEM DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 0201-121-24. A. Recitals. (i) Brock Homes has filed ' application for the issuance of a Variance No. 90 -08 as described in the :isle of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th of September 1990, and continued to November 14, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duty noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby four;a, determi;ied, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1, This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearings an September 26 and November 14, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Tackstem Street and Ringstem Drive with a street frontage of 1,020 feet along Tackstem Street and 1,360 feet along Ringstem and is presently vacant; and (5) The property to the north of the subject site is a Los Angeles Department of Power and Light easement, the property to the south of that site consists ^f single family residential under construction, the property to the east is vacant flood control lard, and the property to the wes is single family residential under construction; and PLANNING C011MISSION RESOLUTION N0, VARIANCE 90 -08 - BROCK HOMES NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 2 (c) The reduction of the minimum lot depth from 150 to 124 square feet is due to the irregularly shaped nature of the western portion of the tract. (d)- The reduction of the minimum average lot size from 22,500 to 21,935 square feet is due to the requirement of an extensive drainage channel along the north tract boundary and the addition of a third cul -de -sac street. (e) The request will not create an inconsistency with the surrounding approved tract and will not be out of character with it, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary. physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use 0f the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of the Variance will not constitute'a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. (a) That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improveoents in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a'Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves thf application subject to each and every condition set forth below. 1) All pertinent conditions of Tentative Tract 14771 shall apply= 6 vx"' ".le PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VARIANCE 90 -03 — BROCK HOMES NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND AXPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE ,CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Ch4',rma� n ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of November, 1990, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r i RESOLUTION 140. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIK. "QIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14771, A RES19ENTIAL SNgDIVISION 0:` 40 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 25,9 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL - DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND NORTH OF RINGSTEM DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPA ^T THEREOF - APN: 0201 - 121 -24. A. Recitalr: (i) Brock Homes has filed 3n application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14771 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sub.act Tentative Tract Map request is refe-•red to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th of September 1990, and continued to November 14, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamongai conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application anti concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. 'his Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts sett forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commissir- during the above- referenced public hearings on September 26 and November 14, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together kith publ•`c •uastimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Tackstem Street and Ringstem Drive with a street frontage of 1,020 feet along Tackstem Street and 1 ?360 feet along Ringstem and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a Los Angeles Department of Power and Light easement, th, property to the south of that site consists of single family residential under construction, the property to the east is vacant flood control land, and the property to the west is single family residential under construction; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14771 - BROCK HOMES NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 2 ice) The project, with the recommended conditions of approve ?, complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rarcho Cucamonga; and (d) The proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan of Trails and the objectives of the Equestrian Overlay District; and (e) The development of 40 single family lots on 25.9 acres of ,and is consistent with the Very Low Residential Land use designation of the General Plana 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific Findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and speci.ic plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and proposed; and (c) The site 4s physically suitable for the type of development (d, The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or.use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. -- 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached herete and inc,rporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: 1) A vocal feeder trail shall cntinue from `he southeast corner of Lot 5, along the east side of Tactstem Street to the north side I] PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 80. TT 14771 - BROCK HOMES NOVEMBER 14, 1991% Page 3 t of Ringstem Drive and te„ninate across from the north - south trail connection on the south side of Ringstem Drive. Said trail shall be constructed With white PVC rail fencing to emulate existing parkway trails n Haven View Estates. 2) The commurity trail at the north edge of the tract shall have a garden wall on the south side of the 12 -foot service road and the standard white PVC fence on the south side of the community trail adjacent to the lots. 3) This submittal shall conform to all provisions of the Hillside Development ordirance (Section 17.24 of the Development Code). 4) Split level pad_: stem walls, and varying floor levels shalt be incorporated on any future Design Review and single family plan check submittals in order to minimize grading. 5) Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever e.ames first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in. the establishment of a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide in conjunctior with applicable school district for the construction and maintenanc,9 of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing district prior to the re:tvrdation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, wnichever comes First. further, if the affected .s -.hoof district has not formed a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Within twelve months of the d' a of approval of the project and pr' or to the recordation of tine final map or issuance of building permits fc said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 6) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the potential Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a deposit on any property. 7) Wien future design review submittals or single family plan checks are submitted, no garage doors shall face Ringstem or Tackstem. 8) The number f front -on garages within this tract shall be limited to percent total. LV 9) Specially designed houses for Lots 2 and 3, with the garages located in the ground, may be required in order to accommodate the slope of the lot and to prevent a structure which may exceed the required building envelope. PANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14771 - BROCK HOMES NOVEI.3ER 14, 1990 Page 4 +. 10) Elimina` the 6 -foot retaining wall in Section O -D (north prepert- line of Lots 2 and 3). Use a ?:1 slope. y Rancho Cucamonga Fire Prot. ^tion District: 1 The project shall comply with the provisi(;s of the fire Safety Overlay District per San Bernardino County Fire Safety Overlay District. Any structure built within the fuee Modification Zone must be approved by the .fire Department and shall be built to FRI requi rements. Any homes constructed -on Lots 1. 2, 3, 10, 11, 12, 19, 20, 21, 22, 32, 33, 34, and 95 shall be reviewed and approved by the Rancho. Cucamonga Fire V ztection District. 1ngineerinq Division: 1) Construct a permanent trapezoidal channel along the north trawl boundary, adjacent to the Los Angeles Department of Light and Power easement, from the end of the existing levee, to remain north of the tract, to the east tract boundary. The channel shall oe privately maintained by a Homeowners Association. The channel design shall be justified by a final drainage study, approved by the City Engineer, to include tie following: a) Provi e a con'-inuous seal between the off site drainage protection for Tracts 12332 (north property line wall) and 14771 and a means for flows from the existing Community Trail swale north of Tract 12332 to enter the channel north of Tract 14771; b) Fencinc on the upstream (north) side shall allow debris passage; c) The misonry wall between the service road and the adjacent Community Trail may incorporate 1.5 f--,et of the 2.5 feet of required freeboard if designed as a floodwall; and d) Provide a 12- foot -wide service road on the downstream (south) side df the channel with two means of access, one from -C" Court and one across the Comunity Trail Lo Tackstem Street. Acr `t to the service road shall, be restricted to maintenanLe personnel only. 2) Drainage protection facilities extending from the east tract boundary to Deer Creek Channel shall be designed to the. satisfaction of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. bT(\, wSb E E • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14771 - BROCK i:.,MES NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 5 3) It shall be the Developer's responsibility to have the current` F -UiM Zone AC designation removed from the project area. The Developer's Engineer shall prepare all necessary repents, plans, hydrologic /hydraulic calculations, etc. A Conditional Letter of Map Rciision (CLOMR) shall be obtained. from FEMA prior to approval of the record map, issuance of 7y permits, or reiroval of the existing levee, whichever occurs first. A letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 4) The required drainage channel along the north % iject boundary shall be operational prior to removal of the existing levee within the project area. 5) The final trainage study shall also address the need for any storm drainage facilities on site. If required, su61 facilities shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. b) Construct an Interior C^.nunity Trail south of and parallel to the channel service road. 7) Walls adjacent to the Community Trail right -of -way shall be maintained by the Homeowners' Association. 8) The temporary cui -de -sac at the end of "C" Court shall include both curb radii and a stub for future extension. 9) Provide sidewalk on the east side of Paddock Drive. 10) Residential intersections shall have their noticeability improved, by moving the 2 t closest trees on each side away from the strei:Z and placed in a tree eas,�:aent.. 11) Provide an irrevocable Offer• to dedicate to the City all c °rePt rights -of -way, street tree easements, and Ltt *_! age easemes for drainage facilities Which drain the Streets. 12) Driveways on Lots S, 15, and 26 shall be located as far from the adjacent intersection as possible to minimize potential conflicts with traffic turning right off of Ringstem °rive. 13) Reconstruct the emergency access road to align with "C" Courf, rather than RlOgstem Drive. The emergency access route steal% remain `unctional at all times per Fire District requirements. 14) The existing Flood Control District permit allowing use of t►e Deer Creek Chf,nel access rsad any bridge for emergency irccess to Tract 123' 2 shall be ame:ided to reflect the ravised alignment. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION W,. TT 14771 - BROCK HOMES NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 6 EI 6. The Suatitar} to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOV.EMBEK 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Panning Commission of the 'City of Ran- ?o Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly -jnd regularly introduced, passed, and adoptzd by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular,iieeing of the Planning Commission held on the 14th, day of November 1990, by thb ,:allowing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • Y 3� Y. ' � ` ` � M N i � O TL Ij wi 111$3e`ex -3~ a3�� HIM— IN TL 3 Till 2 e lY!~, »8 psis «g r j 's s��Y� is 3 1924.1413 1 6324 e 1 N E O H E .k � . I = Y Y t� ;Ill. Ikk p N Is� N n io .w. w \i ilk _yx �L•. ih� p�ti �.,Y �� J �� SJ TL 1 1 _ ! 3 Hir i II ;s r sit� s r %3631 .r 3 UZI V M Y ` = � O HIRIPS.,r. %c, N W cogs i'vD ^•Uu�, $�'' g �� 71r�( r-•sA N L` «jt Y•y -.Ni ji �6 �a� rpq,U`` �a$[ tf 'O" � HH !� �iM` O ^:� �c�•• Syy OV A` sus gE �bs�_�i »'°8 51b3 �' ! RrO� �F�p•°S� 3 Fa - a1�B 4 b� tit Yly rS� •a"r -x �$NT-- gy g i tiII� 7 Sill if a 3g a o w s -- SO H N-131311 am ms! u � 3t gar •��1_3 -3" ® §'ks E3Y 1 s 41 s W. �sB �~ asy'�"y� i b TL —5 a�p43 � —a I p r- h ' =: ass $ r' " itis -33 ej P i l _Ill i p�- R tl�:e .pia SR ao4r r MW -. �'�P. ^!l� lg. g -'rP Y »mod e- j.. tea® =3 rZnA Rasa wg sa�'� ®K�S r� J a _ epug xr� �11 VIA ��ypq'�S�eL+ 5 • °$e ou �C.c QC's- De x, 1.'1 ^,y _ezz ~in --4- Yl-m ^i0 „u` 4N+ o f� r� w'Y YO MM4'J 4�.f�'�"• �..1'yj6 $ .. a opt.; - 3 lust U gs t*�O.XiM j:-!t41 �V`y �1 � N 0i3® •�yp��1� � In i1 �q Yi :^emu UZILS � il 4f � " M at R t ` p` F » y i Y ia laic Its .~o a a g ice^.•'^ i7s� is dpi Alz V+ i W: jig �( °9s Z I .. � ,� 112 Ili} r E w 1 6 .; N 1 01 3.+ 2 :® G a fail 41 K T i Y �t W #h"NU a s E E� a r To IPA w ��iya1O Q V wjr 13 IL N 1 S' I r 6 $y` fib I. s Y ]e- -a till x•35, i a a SGS t s ° 3i �•. " Hui !Q ii� 6q O sId ; O CY+y e > s~ fr> -� a�Y!- r} �V�� —• 9 t (pq �w9 l] •,N. y. � i t: Pn Hl- �9YS �_� QOO+ � 9 � aOw f2�� YM •i � V !� nn41]� Oak y4f M 4 ..fie .°w N+ HMV �i 9i® tl�v Ned 3H WT W « � �p'a°�E H �' � � >s= a 01L f- w w �i IT ' b u w N 9.31 a i I� ); N 1 ► 1 1 �� I IL if AA a3 op tvz ANY -a_ i g S. L � � t — 413 v HU ` y b® i L81 Lam. O e� ow has ti r gal 5 8 ao80 E Zo ii`e v u °e Imo s "8 � � � Y $ ••.a M�tl ° � ��5 � °.S ^Y' mss'• 5:: � '- � ��• � '`, � tl i 4z pS 1�t �M¢ �� O V F1 O� Y r�•ti �.0 gp d L01� 1 �E L' 0.1L •• VIIN L Y VY4�L N1+. s` ,,,Y•a� Z aNw Z� `� aii. 'u w`1a°a �$ $r y t{qq ` •• 88 O 9 V Y rM N Y L— b�$ u G $� �• � et��S o wLO. :o a—s ss a Na S�U g 3� ®i'� p 3 3 3 3 7 L$M GL 9 ` yi.Na �p3v EE e• `` �2Y! YYyy �L .w�{ ® • 7 � �e�� Qb � Y7 �.w EYa S. •+ WW Y M PI $a it si is�3�c's ;Y Vp ®p L i q i Zs S = ®A �•yi,Fr OA 7` r iS led tla �►!I � o • • tl N L tl 3g� 14 L is all is S _► g $ WO �� ; •0 91 s. ' Cl z r•eim Ytl �BN A 5 N a �-9 =3 L��j� i^e ®. ,Yi � a- Ilia � M:1 qqss.�� Fill (rq� •yy WK� Wsy • Fill �i Y S® P i • ® 4 ~I ^I vl 04 + ~ e � I - I 1 r w I O O O �4 C V y p O p N �3sw aL'p L W .".p St►r r3pp� � W m ,r u � b r� w i a$ g S* m M cat bl EM e Y b TL a b d N� N m N W al : ail 1 A 3 N 3° 8 Elo• , m m b � m « b e X11 �z 3 _Ib 4 O at u 4 Y L� s� a E e6e P is V ia` N a A Mi �b —I- �Zi i N a 2 S. yu yr i. sA E i .� Is 9 7 W �• b an e$� 11 _un 1�- b __t . xim RIO IF m � El 1 ` y 4 S I; �• PS I M� O m w Y 0.` �s "S b �$ Ri is! .�i °�Si�i�A mr Si E'rn mgZ g A� bl EM e Y b TL a b d N� N m N W al : ail 1 A 3 N 3° 8 Elo• , m m b � m « b e X11 �z 3 _Ib 4 O at u 4 Y L� s� a E e6e P is V ia` N a A Mi �b —I- �Zi i N a 2 S. yu yr i. sA E i .� Is 9 7 W �• b an e$� 11 _un 1�- b __t . xim RIO IF m � El 1 ` y 11 E 3« L iY O H O. d °e �g s ai o 03 a� �o c� a K Y�r Y .sue d Y g�yyy V 0 t 9u V d Y � F -2 O a! '� u y � � m€' 'e sl .9 - 9 M L OYO u Yd w V A Lurr Y 4l M V a � w °yam j:ww� `le ` oyyysss ejrQ �� C a s• �r q M � M Y �— uro,E 1 r� ®� : c Y sa R SIT wr `'as tV L d Fya ~ i /ice b =� _L IL a a � �NbM yy �as9 g N® wad rl Q tl L =claws ®cr a s '. wf O ie } 9 •sYi Y: L d ~ /ice b =� a �NbM yy �as9 g N® s�® rl a= a s da 22 EMS ®9 wf O ie } 9 1E CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1ViONG.A STAFF REPORT ,.i ._, DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November la, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Bev Nissen, Associate Planner MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE _ TRACT 13564 AKINS A modification to a residential subdivision f 182 lots on 13.2.2 acres of land for a previously approved County Map loc4kted north of Summit. Avenue and east of Wardman Bullock Rord - APN: 225 - 062 -24 ro 26, I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13564 was approved by the County of San Bernardino on August -4, 1987 and revised by the County Planning Commission on November 17, 1988. A Development Agreement was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and entered into as of Jannary 7, 1989, A ore -year time extension for the tract map was approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comm'.n °ion on August 22, 1990. II. AN?LYSIS: A. General: The map approved by the C, -unty of San Bernardino is depicted in Exhibit "B." A re; 4t.; d map was submitted to the City in conjunction with the Design Review for phases 2 -5 of the tract. At that time, the City Engineer ;Wade the determination that the revised map was not in substantial conformance with the map approved by the County of San Bernardino. The differences between the two maps are as follows: 1. Shortened Cul de sacs: Shortened cul de sacs in the r northeastern portion a�o the site (Streets T and S) are now proposed and have resulted from drainage and flood control requirements along the north tract boundary, which include a permanent concrete trapeaodial channel along Lots 1£ 19, and 34 and a realignment northeasterly of the levee along Lots 335 28, 27, 26, 21, 20, and 19. 2. Rearranoed Lots Around T and S Streets: The original map contained eight lots on "T" Street and six lots on "S" Street. The revised .map con W ns seven lots on "T Stree' and seven lots on "S" Street. Therefore, the reconfigured lots meet all code requirements and are compatitle with PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPOPT TT 13564 - AKINS ' November 14, 1990 Page p surrounding lots in regards to lot width, depth, and' area. The number of lots has remaned the same for bath the original and modified maps 3. Deietior. cr Lettered Lots: The original map indicated eight le _tered lots, white the proposed modified map indicates three lettered lots. The original lettered lots included the Community Trail, land needed for flood controi I facilities, and several perimeter slopes on corner side yards, rear yards on double frontage lots, and adjacent to the Southern California Edison easemant along the south tract boundary. The areas were all landscaped and were originally intended to be ,maintained by a Homeowner's Association or added to a maintenance district. The applicant has chosen to convert the five perimeter slope lettered lots to landscape maintenance casements to be maintained by the City, which is acceptable to the Engineering Division. III. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as ti public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily _.iulletin. newspaper, t%*.� property was Posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project; IV. RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends that the Planning Comrission approve the modification to Tentative Tract 13564 through adoption of the attached Resolution cf Approval with Conditions. Res f y ed, Bra e Cit lanne - BB:BN :sp Attachments Exhibit "A'" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Original. Tentat;ve Tract Map' Exhibit "C" - Modified Tentative Tract Map R €,olution of Approval with Conditions M, r � 3 4 J n d � a N s 31 41, —IJ - ---------- oo YLINA T? AN Alk 1. E CITY OF rrEM: MVP. Of a�A RANLUD CUB MONGA TITLE.- CMNV APPCM PLANNING DfVbM EXHIBIT: --BL- t-'SCALE. IT s O h �` r � f /QEJfCOpO °f dO 20\ Z tT26.9 `0G t 136 22 Illt e o ao� tea! • 'ryi _ 171Z .O (`( .i I r �1 T.$ • it r x I' � _vim --�—• 1 A � h � ^a/ � �'n! i 26 �C� m !°° 1 ry • f to y pp t y � G� � �a 1p !! 1� I4n°19 1 "3t " Of IN . � Icaaw � X131 � 1lr699 ! }''-` � •�. ��`a`._.aj II 17 (n� t �' �Ifo8O4 .�i y Np Q : 4000 R• _ --' L. S 10 `F d D2 3 `_`M ° � o 1- ,oes•a I�aa.e -1484Z ws�a g 15 n 16 s A ,�. NOM ANUID CLUANUNCA TrrLE.SOZM PLANNING tXVSM EXHINr 5c��1 -.�" ^�_��t 53HDV 0 ►f 'R'O t 1 Nptl. • j `T- '��+, t?y'j: `�t, 1. �•�, �i, t.�S•,w•.�!'� ,�.r,,�~f' : r� • +, ''�' t x �f r= ` �( s ' — •-r' yy1 It ri _r if rF � •� � � t i � -y � y � ( '` ✓ter � N . i X S> t sauar a►�uaa •n•a ('! xata 1hibObA ►^�a rrEmt OF -111j[ Pi.&NNiNG DIVMJN EXHIBIT- .�'�_ SCALE: .� ID-(D ti t9 3a 1 2 SF= ?0.,553 �"- / ?� 25 h�` 21 20 N SF- 20,354 SF= 2 6,9t4 SF x 2w. �' SF- . No, 4012 25 {} •, gF.14,o54 ),301 3(j7- 1� �� t7.r i w t .r IWjj sF =u..3e:v `- t i�t 10 t 1 93 F a 14,844 4F: 15, 449 5F 4 4 ;9 f �.• = 5,554 51.t }972 15 16 I ' f 36 f 35 T , 31; 5f�t1 'Wp. NOM RANCHO CUCAMK 4CA TITLE: PLANNING DIVBX,%i EXHIBkT.-_. (L_ SCALE .._ 0 7 RESOLUTIt9N NO. A RESOLUTIOA OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALTFPRRIA, MODIFYING TENTATIVE TRACT ` MAP NO. 13564, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 182 LOTS ON 122.2 ACRES OF LAND FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED COUNTY 14AP LOCATED NORTH OF SUW1T AVENUE A►!D EAST OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN LiPPORT THEREOF PPN: 226- 082 -24 TO 26. A. Recitals. (i) On August 24, 1987 the Coun*,y of Saa Vernardino approved Tentative Tract 13564, consisting of 182 residential lots: and eight lettered lots on approximately 122.2 acres. (if) On January 7, 1969 the Rancho Cucamonga City Council entered into Development Agreement 88 -02 thereby approving Tentative Tracts 13564 and 13565, the Etiwanda Highlands Planned Community. (iii) On March 8, 1990 a modification retpPst was filed by Akins Development Company to allow fer a slightly revised street and lot layout in the northeast portion of the site, the dele`ion of five le ' tered lots and tine addition of a permanent concrete channel along the northerly tract boundary. (iv) C9 November 14, 1990 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conddcted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that data. (v) All regal prerequisites pric• to the adoption of this Resolution have occurs -ed. B. Resuluti�.: NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Thi- Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth i.? t,:A ccftals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Z. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - reverenced public hearing on Novmber 14, 1990, including written and <,ral staff reports, together with pubiit, -estimony, tnis Commission hO eby specifically finds as follows: (a) The applicafioi contemplates the modification to Tentative Tract Map 13564, which was approved by the Crgnty of Syr Bernardino on August 24, 1987 and revised by he County Planning �,tm mi'ssioi on November 17, 1968, and subseq:tently annexed into the lCity of Rancho Cucamonga. D'� 07011-02 11 -14 -9C .PC Agenda 3 of 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13564 - AKINS November 14, 1990 Page 2 (b) The proposed modifications have resulted from drainage 'Ind fl ,iod control r?quirements along he north tract boundary and conversion of fi,e perimeter Scope "lettered lots" to landscape maintenance easements. (c) The modified Tentative Map would act as a document in substantial conformance with the Development Agreement, Development Plan, and the Annexation Agreement, and become the formal entitlement document, replacing the original Tentative Map. a. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific iindings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby f=inds and concludes as follows: (a) The Tentative Tract is consistent with 'the General Plan, Development Code, and Etiwanda .-ighlands Specific Plan; and (b) The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan; and proposed;. and (c) The site is physically sui�aM a for the type of development (d) The design of the suk> visitn is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidkl, --Ie injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The Tentative Tract is not like`vy to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission] hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, that a Negative Declaration was issued on October 26, 1988. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby modifies the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and incorpirated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) The modified tem:ative tract map shall be subject to all conditions contained in Development Agreement 88 -02 as adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, r LJ Ll i I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13564 AKINS November 14, 1990 Page 3 Engineering 1) -edications for the construction of Wardman Bullock Road and "U" Street west of the west %fact ooundary, tc and including a complete intersection of the t ti streets, shall be obtained orior to Final Map approval or issuance of j build'ag permits, whichever occurs first. 2) "U" Street shall intersect Wardman Bullock Road as near to 90 degrees (radial) as poss.bie without sacrificing other street design standards. 3) The str in drain system within "C" Street shall be designed to m1nimize the possibility of overflow across private property in the event of blockage in a catch basin, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Provide a graded overflow path, as needed within a public easement. 4) Construct permanent trapezoidal channel along the north tract boundary between Wardman Channel and the Morse Levee. 5) Provide a wall, which may include up- to 1.5 feet of freeboard, or other approved security fencing between the community trail, or private lots, and the chL yet service road. 6) City maintained areas on the west side of "B" Street shall extend to the tops of slopes outside a perimeter wail. The width shall be variable, with a minimum of 12 feet when the adjacent lot slopes away from the street. 7) City maintai id slopes, rhether in lettered lots or landscape easements, shall be no greater than 3:1. 8) Provide street tree easements, six feet wide, behind the sidewalk on all cul de sacs. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to th,; adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry c e , Cnairman A7T' ;T; Brad Buller, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13564 - AKINS November 14, 1990 Page 4 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of th, Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of November 1990, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT y � DAT €s November 14, 1990 :�_a TO: Chairman and Members of the Plannirg Commission FROM: Brad Bullar, City Planner BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ' MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89 -17- INLAND Rtu_. FELLOWSt_'P - A request to modify conditions of approval relating to the timing of on -site improvements for a previously approved project - consisting of a church in an existing building totaling 16,457 square' feet on 2.42 acres of land in the Medium 'Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per .cre) located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Amethyst Avenue - APN: 2%ji- 474 -02 and 03. Related file: Conditional Use Permit Pn -09. 1. ABSTRACT: The z;;alicant is requesting a m.►dification to several conditions from the original Resolution uf Approval for the project regarding the timing of on -site improvements. Approval of the request would give the church additiondl time to comply with these conditions. II. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission originally approved this project on October 25, 1989. The app-.,oval required the church to upgrade the site to comply with current codes and requirements prior to beginning services there. A Phasing Pl a ; (see Exhi Ni t "G") was attached to the' original - staff report fur the Planning Commission's review. This outlined the items which were proposed to be completed within certain time limits. Phase One included those items which were proposed to be completed prior to occupancy. Phase Two included those items which were proposed to be completed within one year of the Conditional Use Permit approval. Phases Three and Four were projects with four- to five -year goals. The ResolutioK, of Approval does riot specifically incorporate the Phasing Plan as a condition of approval. Several of the items listed in the Phasing Plan were incorporated as conditions and references were made to Phase One and Two. However, there are some inconsistencies between the Phasing Plan and the Resolution of Approval, Because the applicant is requesting to modify the Resolution of Approval, staff will use this opportunity to clear ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89 -17 - INLAND,AREA FELLOWSHIP November 14, 1990 Page 2 Agbi up any confusion relating. to the timing 0 the required. improvements. Typically, ail on -site improvements are required to be completed prior to occupancy of any project. Because of the financial constraints of the applicant and the flexibility allowed with a Conditional Use - Permit, the Planning Commission approved the application subject to having the required improvements completed within certain time Limits. The church had hoped to occupy the site„ start day care activities, and begin increasing its membership by now. However, lack of ttmo and money has resulted in delays. III. REQUESTED MODIFICATIONS: At issue are Planning's Special Conditions_ 2, 3, 4, and 7 of Resolution No. 89 -139 (attached) which had not been completed prior to October 25, 1990 (the anniversary of the Conditional Use Permit approval). The ap:•- licant referred to several of these in his letter. In addit'arn, staff also recommends that Conditions 6 and 8 be modified to clear up any possible confusion. A brief discussion of these conditions follgws: Condition 02: "The .existing grass area "north of the northern. access aisle shall be temporarily landscaped with a native drought tolerant groundcover.mix and a temporary surface irrigation system shall be provided. Installation shall occur prior to occupancy." The applicant is requesting an additional year to install temporary irrigation and landscaping to the area north of the parking lot. The area is vacant and consists of soil and weeds. Temporary landscaping is a typical requirement for projects which are built in phases. If the Commission decides to grant the applicant's request, it may wish to require regular weed abatement, or clearing the site and applying a soil steritant. - Condition 93: "The existing Pinus Radiata tree within the row of palm trees shall be relocated within the planter near the northwest corner of the building, during Phase One of the r improvements program prior to occupancy of the building, in accordance with the arbori.,,t recommendations." I The Pinus Radiata (Monterey Pine) being referred to in this condition was accidentally removed when grading operations were taking place. Staff required the applicant to replace the tree with a 24 -inch box size Japanese Black Pine (Pious Thumbegiana) tree. The tree has still not been replaced and the applicant is requesting that its planting be delayed two additional years. - PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89 -17 - INLAND, AREA FELLOWSHIP tlovember 14, 1990 Page 3 However, staff would recommend that the Pine be planted s immediately because the surrounding landscaping is currently being installed. This Pine should be installed near the northwest corner of the building. Condition i14: "A decorative block wall shall be constructed along the west property line from the future access point for the property to the west to the e)!Isting wall. The new portion of wall shall be o�,- a material consistent with the existing wall along the nort', and west property lines. Said, wall shall be completed witoi'n one (1) year of the Planning Commission approval date of the project. Detailed plans and elevations of the walls shall be reviewed and approved by the Plannidg Division prior to the issuance of building permits for said walls. In addition, the applicant shall contact adjoining property owners to coordinate the removal of the existing chain link fence along the west property line." Staff supports the applicant's request for an additional two years to construct a wail along the westerly property lime. Granting the extension should allow the developer of the adjacent property time to have his plans approved so that the wall could be built to the benefit of both properties. The application foe- the adjacent project, Tract 14679. is complete and was reviewed by the Technical and Design. Review Committees on October 16 and 18, 1990. This may also provide an opportunity for the church to share the cast of building the wall. The Commission may wish to require that the wall be built when the adjacent property develops, or within a two year period, whichever comes first. Condition 06: Staff also recommends that condition #6 be modified to delete the reference to Phase Two. The condition currently states: "Additional streetscape planting along Amethyst Avenue, north of the required access point, shall be incorporated into Phase Two." The revised condition 06 would require the completion of landscaping along Amethyst Avenue between the curb and the existing retaining wall prior to occupancy. Condition V: "The proposed landscaping along the west property line shall be in place within one (1) year of the Planning Commission approval date for this project. Other areas of parking lot landscaping not already included in Phase One shall be incorporated into Phase One, which shall be installed prior to occupancy of the building." PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89 -17 IIILAND, AREA FELLOWSHIP November 14, 1990 Page 4 Staff suggests that the Commission support the applicant's request to extend the installation of landscaping of the west property line provided that this area be kept free of weeds and debris.. A soil sterilant may be an appropriate condition of the extension. Such landscaping should be installed at the time of the wall's construction, Condition #8t This condition currently states that "the applicant shah file an application with the Planning Division for consideration of the building as a Historic Landmark within one (1) year of the Planning Commission approval date or prior to any construction of new buildings, whichever comes first." The Historic Preservation Commission has stated that the building could be considered for landmark designation if it'were renovated to its original architectural treatment. Staff suggests that the church rile a landmark application prior to beginning any restoration of the building to its original architectural treatment. This renovation should be completed prior, to the construction of any.new structures on the `site. IV. HISTORY: The church has not occupied the building because it has not completed the conditions i,,i the Resolution. Additionally, many of the items in Phases One and Two had not been completed by October 25, 1990, which was the proposes completion date of Phase Two. The applicant is specifically requesting that a time extension be granted for those highlighted conditions, as shown in Exhibit "AA" and Resolution 89 -139 which have not' been completed by the required dates. Below is a summary explaining the status of the site in relation to the Phasing Plan and the Conditions of Approval. COMPLETED AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1990: 1. Removal of dead treei. - 2. On -site paving, curbing, striping (Planning condition #1). I 3. Removal of on -site utility.lines/poles (Engineering condition 4. Street improvements (Standard Condition) which were part of .a City capital improvement project: S. Exterior painting. 6. Parking lot landscaping, within Phase One (see Exhibit "C"). ' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89 -17 - INLAND-AREA FELLOWSHIP November '4, 1990 Page 5 W] V. • PEMAININO'ITEMS NOT COMPLETED BY OCTOBER 31 1990: * 1. Relocate Pinus Radiata tree (replacement required) (Planning condition #3). 2. Landscape future pad area with drought tolerant groundcover and temporary irrigation (Planning condition - #2). 3. Buiid play area. * 4. Install balance of landscaping (Planning condition #7). 5. Remove rock t=errace and repair entry stdps to original design. * 6. Landscape planter, on west property line (Planning condition #7). * 7. Block wall along west property Line (Planning condition P4). 8. Interior Remodeling. 9. 19th Street streetscape planting. 10. Amethyst Avenue streetscape planting (south of driveway). 11. Groundcover north of Amethyst Avenue driveway (along streetscape). 12. Plant trees along Amethyst Avenue - (north of driveway) (Planning condition #6). * 13. File an application for Historic Landmark consideration (Planning condition 08). 14. Remove chain link fenc? north of Amethyst. Avenue driveway. * Indicates items specifically mentioned in extension request letter. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution of Approval which will 'replace conditions 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 of the original Resolution of Approval, ^' PLANNING COMISSXON STAFF REPORT CUP a9 -17 - INLAND,AREA FELLOWSHIP Now.1mber 14, 1F90 Pag,; 6 R Respe tfull itt ^+ Ir , :rad Butler City Plan-/n BB:SR :js Attachments: Exhibit "AA" - Letter from applicant; Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization flap Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landsape Plan Exhib +t "Q" - Conceptual Grading Plant Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Plan !Exhibit "G" - 2roposed Phasing'Prograny Staff Report dated October 25, 1989 Resolution 89 -139 Planning Commission Minutes 1 :O.m 'October 25, 2989 Resolution 89 -139A ARL 1 r i +1 I i Eve PROJKC1 OUCRIPTrOut It is requested that the following Planning oivasion conditions for CUP 40 -L7 be modified. (i) The dardkine for the installation of the landscaping located north of the parking area, including the grouAe; cover, be extended until October 25, 1991. (Condition 2) (2) The deadline for tae planting of the 240 JloaDese black Pine be delayed until October" 35, 1992. (CnMitioft 3) eal (3) The , %dlino for the completion of 'be bltror.. wall on the w s (est s ion 4) property be extended untii OWAbar 25, 1993. along the Westt the sidedofnethe property installation all of other Phase landscaping landscaping be extended until October 25, 1991. Rationales The primary reason for the these extensions is the church's inability to afford these improvements at this time. If these extension ere not granted, the church will be unable to- complete the project and therefore will need to sell the property. Additional Reasons for requesting the extension of items (1) and (3): (1) Ground covers with the current drought in effect, it would be 0 waste of water to install over an act* of ground cover. Even though it is a drought tolerant type of cover, it still would use up a considerable amount of water in u time when conservation is needed. (3) Aleck wall. First of all, the purpoaa of the block wall is to provide a barrier between two conflicting tepee of usage. The property to the west is not currently being occupied. The owners have radC ipplioation with the city to develop 10 condominiums on the site. Until the site begins to be develop, there will not any conflicting usage. Whom the site is developed the church would be in a position to share the expanse vial thr, developers to the west. secondly, aecause of the variw. -)r in elevation between the two properti',s, it would be diffiaild to determine how to construct the wall without an approved grading plan for the property to the west. AACRGRMD IHPOMIATION: (1) When applying for the CUP the church requested to phase in the city - required improvements. This was requested because the church was unable to financially afford all the improvements da_ired by the City. A one year extension was granted for several itch. At that time it was felt by both the church and the Planning Commission that tte church should be in the property wall before this date. Thers2ore it would have tiae to grow su'.icieatly to be able to afford to sake these improvements. This It" not been the case. Therefore the church is unstie to seat the deadline for these reVirad improvements. (2) It is the desire of the church to comply with the requirements of the City. We desire the site to be attractive and an asset to the community. Our only problem is the financial costs. Nora time will enable us to afford tbess improvements. (3) The church has invented a substantial amount of money and work in the site already. Grading of the site, installation of the parking lot, construction of parking lot lighting, removal of unsightly structures and plants; construction of handicap rest rooms and handicap ramps, and the remodelling of the main sanctuary. into �ir Met churches experience substantial growth after moving permanent facility. The location of this site and the phone calls generated by tha signs an the property lead us to believe that we too shall experience significant growth. This ti:vYffitabl®i r�siestet*d. Mete the above improvements within the SY OF T. UCAMONGA Pi.AdNL $R3 `F�3 IaN Tnu :_LP Yzc fa A�Itad ..:a�........rr: A sL;i.E: U. w, t: ZOND M[ XMnUL op: '\ZoNaComim"AL E El w c1aY ag: R�" b-'CUCAMONGA [F7:M:F-f- PLANMI TG' DMSION k /t� f -, vn //�t a s ",�'% gea�.E � �1 Tabwd$ e e,s Ma Ot'!p CwsN, lit!", UMOMM" Mss t r' .01 . 5 1 CIIX OF 'RAN P CUCAMONGA PLA.NNIP TG' Dr MION . fl ITEM -CUP 3g- Tn-LE _ S. +. t.,, EXYiIBrr' r'ly" SCALE: Z e -9 _ .,. ,.`. swm ft 1pp'pi1w111'IA , 9f . t ,t• r �, _ •'+ � •' � • , • • mow• .r .� + • +� � It CI OF RANidkOr'CtkAMONGA PLANNING DM- SION EXHIBrr: "p�� SCALE, • � � 44 CITY OF'` R 1�I �C3 JCL f.AMONGA PLANNING' DMSION Aft rrElyl; t uP 22-12 E- HIBIT: "E-R" SGALE: � -lam L1 Wl El O v..h 4•f i� h 4 war CY ° dfK i COO AMONGA i 6 ( R&-,N PLANRKG' DngSION Wr-l--W ,2 CITY GF �° Ct M®NGA rrEMa C Q P 56r- ll PLANNIMG' I3MSION IZSFIi:E: toa.- A MISIM"F"' SCALE: C EXH ;BIT "G" PROPOSED NASIHG PROGRAM I. Exterior painting 2. Interior remodeling 3. 19th Streetscape planting 4. Amethyst streetscape planting (south of driveway) S. Groundcover north of Amethyst driveway 6. Remove dead trees 7. On -site 'paving, curbing, striping 8. Parking lot landscaping (except for west property line) 9. Relocate Pinus. eadiata tree 10. Landscape future pad area with drought t fm t cgroundcover and temporary irrigation 11. Rerr4ve utility lines /poles 12. Street improvements PHASE II 1. Build play area 2. Install balance.of land_l�aping 3. Remove rock terrace and reps ?r entry steps to original design 4. Plant trees along Amethyst Avenue (north of driveway) S. Landscape planner on west p.l. G. Block wall along west p.l. 7. Preschool (separate application) 'I. Proposed ` l�� W1e Prior to occupancy Prior to occupancy Prior to occupancy Prior to occupancy Prior to occupancy Prior to occupancy Prior to occupancy Prior to occupancy Prior to occupancy Prior to occupancy Prior to occupancy Prior to occupancy, Within 1 year of CUP approval Within 1 year of CUP approval Within 1 year of CUP approval Within 1 yrar of CUP approval Within 1 year of CUP _ approval Within 1 year of CUP approval Within 1 year of CUP approval NORTH ITEM: ,.........„ TITLE: ad% ♦ Fr. PHA:r III AMIk 1. Refurbish building to original Within 4 years of CUP architectural treatment approval ' PHASE IV 1. Multi- purpose /gym (separate application) Within 5 years of CUP approval 2. future parking for gym Within 5 years of CUP approval 3. Underground utilities Within 5 years of CUP approval i CITY OF RANCHO CUCA4IONGA SAFE RETORT 1 k. DATE: October 25, 1989 TO: Chairman and .1emberis of the Planning Coomission FROM: Brad. Buller, City Planner BY: Stave Hayes, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89 -17 - request to es a sh a c rch In an-f- xisting u d ng totaling 16,457 square feet on 2.42 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwellin, units per acre), 'located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Amethyst Avenue 4PN: 201-W-02 and 03. I. PROJECT AND SIT€ DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to establish a church in an existing building and issuance of a ,Negative Declaration. 8, Surrounding Use and inning: North Sen orb i� t- zen apartments; Nigh Density Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acre). Also, this area lies within a Senior Housing Overlay District. South - Single family residence; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East Post Office, Fire Station and offices; Office Professional and Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West Single family residence; Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwalling units per acre) C. General Plan Desf nations: Project Site - G ium"bensity Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) North High 'Density Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East Office and Civic /Coati nity West - Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) -(7 PLANNING COMMISSIC ;TAFF REPORT CUP 89 -17 - INLAJ%? -AREA: FELLOWSHIP October 25, 1989 Page 2 AML 1 0. SIta Characteristics: The site contains the historic Alta Loma School building built In 1921, asphalt areas, and many mature pine and palm trees. The site slopes gently to the south at roughly 4 percent. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Church Sanctuary 21100 1/35 60 72 F. ARplicable Regulations- The Medium Density Residential eve opment istrict aTTows Churches <:ubject to approval of a Conditic,,;rl Use Permit by the Planning Commission.- 11. XiALYSIS• A. Generals inland Area Fellowship is proposing to use an existing building, the old Alta Loma School, as their church, facility. Most recently, the buildi^_ =.'mss the Alta Loma Ask Manor. This building was designated a point of Historic Interest by the City Council on December 21, 19S. after recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission. It was the Council's desire to have the building be restored to its original condition as much as possible, and be designated as an historic landmark in the future. The attached staff report to the Historic Preservation Commission dated November 3, 1988 highlights the history of the school building, B. Land Use Compatibility: The primary issue- associated with this proposal is the compatibility with existing residential_ development ad .'scent to the site. The church is proposing to locatrz.an a property that abuts residential development to the north and west. As a result, potential conflicts between ifizti-4tional and residential land uses are possible, such as, additional noise and traffic, and loss of privacy. To buffer the church from surrounding residences, a solid wail is recommended along the west property line. Currently, a block wail exists between the proposed church, site and the senior, horsing project to the north. Only a chain link fence exists along a majority of the west property line. Staff has received, preliminary interest in a townhouse development to the west of the church site. u PLANNING CWMISSIP ;TAFF REPORT CLIP 89 -17 - INLAND ARsA FELLOUSH14 October 25. 1989 Page 3 4 C. Phasing Immgrovements: In conjunction With the request to use the building as a church, other improvements are recommended by staff. The church is proposing to phase these improvements (see Exhibit "G "). D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (MeNiel, Weinberger, Krouti recommended approval at its October 5, 1989 meeting subject to the following conditions: 1. The building colors should be revised to incorporate a more subtle "cream" color scheme. (A revised color board will be submitted for review and approval of the Design Review Committee prior to this Planning Commission meeting date). 2. The existing pine tree within the row of palm trees along the north side of the north drive should be relocated within the planter near the northwest corner of the building. 3. A block wall should be constructed along the west property line from the future access point for the property to the west to the existing wall. The new portion of the wall should be of a material consistent with the existing wa1Y along the north and west property lines. Said wall should be in place within one (1) year of the .Planning Commission's approval date of the project. The Committee suggested that the applicant work cooperatively with the property owner to the west to have the wall constructed within the required time frame. 4. Interlocking pavers should be included at both vehicular entrances and in a pedestrian crossing, near the main entrance to the building. 5. Additional streetscape planting along Amethyst Avenue, north of tl a required access point, should be included in Phase 2 of the church's phasing program. 6. The proposed landscaping along the west property line should be in place within one (1) year of the Planning Commission's approval date for this project. Other areas of parking lot landscaping not already included in Phase 1 should be incorporated into Phase 1. E. Technical Review Committee: On October 3, 1989, the Committee reviewed the project an etermined that, with the recommended standard conditions of approval, the project is consistent PLANNING COMMISSIO ,TAFF REPORT J CUP 89-27 INLAND-AREA FELLOWSHIP October 25, 1989 Page 4 Aft 1 t with all applicable standards and ordinancei. The Grading Committee concs;,Wal ly approved the project at its meeting on October 2. 3389. F. Environmental Assessment :. Part I of the Initial Study has been comp eted by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and determined that the project could have significant adverse environmental impacts in tree removals as a result of this project. An arborist report was prepare for the site to address the health of all mature heritage tr«s on -site. The aeiorist's findings indicated that a, majority of the trees were i "ealthy. The landscape plan reflects that all healthy mature trees on-site will be pr:�erved. therefore, mitigation through preservation has been t1oic1luded in the project's design. If the Commission conn,rs with ,staff's findings, then issuance of a Negative Doclaration would be <: wr*.W. III. FACTS FOR FINOY'NSS: 1. The pr- zposed use is in accord With the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of Ark the district in which the site is located. qu 2. The proposed use, together with. the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially in,ju ious to properties or improvements in 'Whi: vicinity. 3. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Developmwnt Code. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised t:; a public hearing in TaTY -Y Reportt newspaper, the property posted, and notices mailed to aall property owners within 300 feet of the project. V. RECOidMENDATION: If the Planning Commission concurs with the p'roposse pr- a INQ program, staff recommend! *h _. .. w- anission approve Conditional Use Permit 89 -17 through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. R tfuI bmi , Br l City lann. BBSH:mig PLANNING COMMISSIO ,TAFF REPORT CUP 89 -17 - INLANO- AREA FELLOWSHIP October 25, 1989 Page 5 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Plan Exhibit "G" Proposed Phasing Program Hi star! a,Preservation Commission Staff Report dated November 3, 1988 Resolutioo of Approval I I' RESOLUTION NO. 89 -139 Ask A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89 -17 FOR A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A. CHURCH IN AN EXISTING BUILDING TOTALING 16,457 SQUARE FEE'S ON 2.42 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MM IUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER of 19TH STREET AND AMETHYST AVERVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. - APN: 201- 474 -02 AN0 03. A. Recitals. (i) Inland Area Fellowship has filed an applicatiom for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit Ne. 89 -17 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject conditional Use Permit request is referred to. as "the application ". (ii) On the 25th of October, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga coiducted a duly noticed public 'hearing on, the applicaticn and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adopt'on of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this -Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 25, 1989, including written and ri -al staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission heresy spn. ifically finds as follows: _ (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Amethyst Avenue with a street. Frontage of 640 feet and lot depth of 365 feet and is presently improved with an existing building, paved parking areas, curb and gutter; and (b) The property to the north of ,the subject site is senior citizen housing, the property to the south of that site consists of a single family residence, the property to the east is developed with a post office, fire station and offices, and the property to the west is a single family residence; and (c) The property is toned "Medium Residential" by the Development Code. t -`3A. L P1LAMNING C"ISM " RESOLUTION NO. 89,139 CUP 89 -17 - INLAN • MA FELLOWSHIP OCTOBER 25, 1989 Page 2 v 3. Based'upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 , "rove, this Commission hereby finds and concludes -s follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord wit�i the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and. the purposes of the district in which the site is located.: (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1. Berming, low decorative walls, dense landscaping, or any combination thereof, shall be provided to screen the parka ►g areas from view of Amethyst Avenue and 19th Street. + 2. The existing grass area north of the northern access aisle shall be temporarily landscaped with a native drought tolerant groundcover mix and a temporary surface irrigation system shell t-2 provided. Installation shall occur prior to occupancy. 3. The existing Pinus Radiata tree within the row of palm trees shall be relocated within the planter near the northwest corner of the building, during Phase I of the improvement program prior to occupancy of the building, in accordance with the arborist recommendations. . 4. A decorative block wall shall b* constructed along the west property line from the future access point for the property to the west to the existing wall. The new portion of wall PLANXING COMMISSION' "ESOLUTION NO.'89 -133 CUP 89 -17 • INLAND , EA FELLOWSHIP OCTOBER 25, 1989 Pager 3 E should be o., a material consistent with the existing Wall along. the north and west property lines. Said wall shall be completed within one (1) year of the Planning Commission approval date of the project. Detailed plans and elevations of the walls shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits for said walls. In addition, the applicant shall contact adyoining property owners to coordinate the removal of the existing chain link fence along the west property Tine. S. Interlocking pavers shall be included at both vehicular entrances and at a pedestrian crossing near the main entrance to the building. Said pavers shall be installed during the on -site paving portion of the phasing program, prior to occupancy of the building. Material samples to be approved by City Planner. . S. Additional streetscape plating along Amethyst Aveiwe, north of the required actess point, shall be incorporated into Phase II. 7. The proposed landscaping along the west property line shall be in place within one (1) year of the Planning Commission approval date for this project. Other areas of parking lot landscaping not already included in Phase I shall be incorporated into Phase I, which shall be installed prior to occupancy of the building. 8. The applicant shall file an application with the Planning Division for consideration of the building as a Historic Landmark within one (1) year of the Planning Commission approval date or prior to any construction of new buildings, whichever occurs first.. Engineering Division 1. The developer shall remove the existing overhead utility lines and poles located along the west project boundary prior to occupancy of the building. 2. Undergrounding of utilities in conformance with City policy will be required with future expansion of the site. 6. The Secretary. to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. v E -�Z4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 89 -139 CUP 89 -17 - INLAK , ;EA FELLOWSHIP OCTOBER 25, 1989 Page 4 0 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1989. PLANNING C,OWIISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �! Commissioner Toistoy concurred, especially with the requirement to convert the room back to a garage when it was no longer needed. Cam,nissioner "'hitiea felt •.a Variance request was for special circumstances, not merely for convenience. She felt the parking issue had been we''l thought. out. Commissioner Weinberger felt the use was legitimate. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Weinberger, to adori the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Variance 89 -11. Motion carried by the vollowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY - carried J. ENVIRO14ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PEkt4IT 89 -17 - INLAW AREA FELLOWSRIP - A request to establisha church ra an existing u ng totaling 16,457 square feet on 2.42 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Amethyst Avenue - APN: 201- 474-02 and 03. Ste-;-,A Hayes, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Bill Glanders, inland Area Fellowship Pastor, stated the chcrch ryas started about 2 -1/7 years ago by eight families and currently meets in a preschool facility. 3e said the congregation has grown to 88 families and the current facility was too crowded. They also wished to have their oar :acility so thp,, could go to a seven - day -per -week ministry. Alan Dalmau, Pitassi Dalmau Architects, stated they felt the building was a building of significance on a significant corner. He stated they had worked diligently with Engineering regarding placement of the driveways. He discussed their proposed ;,hasing plan and stated they nre trying to get into the building as cheaply as possible because of -iv limited budget and wou"'4 upgrade the location as monies become available. Ht stated they wanted to restore the building as near as possible to its original architectural treatment, except they wanted to leave the portion that was added to the building in the 1950s. Chairman McNiel stated he didn't feel refurbishing the building should mean removing any additions to the building. He asked for clarification r-e ending the �Iti1ity lines and poles to be removed in Phase I and the undergrounding proposed for Phase IV. Planning Commission Minutes -6- ---�(0 October 25, 1989 63rrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the utility poles referred to in Phase I were -on-site poles, while the undergrounding in Phase IV referred to the utilities along the street frontage. Mr. Dalmau stated that currently the prorarty was comprised of two parcels,, with thL property line running through the proposed parking tot. He said the` church would like to retain the two separate parcels because they have five- year financing on the larger parcel and woull like to have the ability to sell off the smaller lot if it became necessary. He said if the church ve-re required to sell off the smaller parcel, they would place the Yost parking to the north of the church. He asked if City Counsel could advise if the property owner could grant an easement to itself and suggested that the project be conditioned to provide placement of additional parking on -site if the smaller parcel were sold in the future. He stated the plans current 4y call for developing the smaller parcel with a gymnasium. He sa +d the church wanted the separate parcels so they could encumber only the site with the building in order to pull more money out when refinancing. He requested that standard street improvement conditions L.5, 10, arod 11 be removed from the Resolution because the City is currently working oru the street and w "I install the improvements. He requested that standard street improvem,, r. condition LAS be removed because they are "t proposing to do any wov* on 19th Street. He requested that standard condition M.i be rewritten to allow provision of utilities to the second parcel only %ten they build on it. Chairman McNiel asked how much of the parking was located on the smaller pa"..el. Mr. Dalmau responded approximately SQ percent. He said additional parking could be added to the larger parcel if it were needed. He felt a church use would be ideal for the building because they could utilize the facility in a similar fashion as the original school had used the building. He Said they planned to use the old auditorium as their sanctuary. He said the church was anxious to move in because they were currently paying rent on their old facility as well as the mortgage payment on the new location. He stated they felt the building is ideal for a church. He expressed appreciation to the staff for their efforts in working with the church. Commissioner CV. :lea asked if they had design plans for Phase III. Mr. Dalmau r it the elevation would be drawn up basically similar to the photograph _ om 1921 shown on page J -21 of the staff report. He said the parapet shown in the photograph would be the main extent of the restoration. Hi said they planned to r+smove the rock terrace to expose the steps underneath within a year. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if Fire Oepartn;±nt requirements wart taken into account. Mr. Dalmau stated there were already working fire sprinklers in the building and the building had already been sisited by Fire Department and City 'Building and Safety staff. He stated they anticipated a few minor alterations to the Planning ComnisMon 9inut+ s -7- October 25, 1989 Z _�Z-1 fire alarm system and the major expenditures would be inside to meet the handicap access requlitments and refurbishing of corridors to meet that one - hour "re rating requirement. Cr sioner Chiti'ea asked whit type of signage was prnposed. Mr. Dalmeu stated the signage was not included with this submittal, but they would tike to put a sign in the recessed parapet area and they were considering a corner monument sign to match the architecture of the original parapet. Commissioner Tolstoy asked If the parcels retrained separate what a possible use could be for the smaller parcel. He asked if there w:xild be room for a safe driveway. Mr. 00 maa stated there were currently two driveways along Amethyst and two along 19th which are being consolidated to move them further from the intersection. He said if the smaller parcel were sold, it would require a reciprocal easement between the new property owner and the church. Mr. Tolstoy stated the only possible use wood be residential and he felt the long narrow configuration wound not be very viable for development. Mr. Hanson stated that if the church wished to have two parcels, the proposed prcject should be self- contained and the other parcel should be master planned. Chuck Carelli, 9044 Citation Court, stated they would like to add to the beautification of the City by improving the deteriorating building. He said the last resort would be to sell tha smaller parcel because they could not afford to sell the property and lose needed parking and a future play area. He said they were locked into a note on the large parcel with approximately four years left to go and they ,. shed to have the ability to encumber the smaller parcel by ite"O f at a future time. He said they wanted to have the ability to secure first trust deeds on each property. Chairman McNiel stated the applicant was asking the City to agree to allow a lot line to remain which would allow the smaller lot to be sold; but if the smaller lot were sold, the current project Would no longerr be feasible. - He said under normal circumstances each section would be planed separately with master planting for the area. Mr. Carelli stated it would cause financial hardship if they had to combine the parcels and obtain future financing on both parcels together. Chairman McNiel stated that if the western parcel we,-e eliminated, the eastern parcel could not stand on its own. Pastor Flanders stated they appreciated the help received from the City. He said it was the desire of the church to provide if nice facility, but they were limited in their funds and had therefore requested the phasing. Planning Comiission Minutes a- October 25, 1989 l /: Nearing no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. Aft Ir Chairman McNial stated he appreciateer the architect's attitude toward the building and what the church was trying to accomplish. He felt the lot line needed to be elitninat4d and one parcel should be created bec.rse one portion could not stand without the other.. He appreciated the desire for the ability to obtain two first trust deeds, but felt it was not viable to split the property; and as the City could not restrict the future sale of a lot, it was Important to eliminate the tot split. Commissioner Toistoy concurred. He felt if the property were a commercial property, the shared access agreement would be mire acceptable. However, in a residential zone he could not envision any plan for the smaller lot that would allow development. He feat it would be a mistake to leave the land as two lots. Commissioner Chitiea agreed. She felt that if the design were such that each piece ould stand on its own, it would be appropriate to leave the lot split. However with the; current design, if tta church' wer.: to sell off the smaller property the survival of the church would be imperiled and the City could be criticized for allowing the project. She felt that the proposed architectural enhancentents and landscaping would be an asset to the comity, but thought consolidation of the lots was essential. Y Commissioner Weinberger concurred. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt she Resolution AISL approving Environmeatal Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 89 -17. Motion carried by the following vote: r AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIE,a, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIOP99S: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY carried Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing to allow a question from Fir, Oalmau. Mr. Oalmau asked for clarification on the standard engineering conditions.- Chairman McNiel stated they were just standard conditions that are placed on projects in ease the people who are supposed to perform the work foil to do so. He said the City is committed to perform the work. He reclosed the public hearing. 8:30 P.M. - Planning Commission R "esned 8 :50 P.Mr - Plannirr3 Commission Reconvened Planning Commission Minutes -9- October 25, 1989 RESOLUTION N4. 89 -139A AIML A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAA., CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATING TO THE TIMING OF ON --SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89 -17 FOR A REQUEST TO ESIABLISH A CHURCH IN AN EXISTIM G BUILDINGS TOTALING 16,457 SQUARE FEET ON 2.42 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8 -14 OWELLING UNITS FER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND AMETHYST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APH.- 201 - 474 -02 AND 03, A. Recitals M Inland Area Fellowship received approval from the Rancho Cucamonga Punning Commission for Conditional Use Permit No. 89 -17, with conditions included, in Resolution No. 09-139, at a duly noticed public hearing on October 25, 1989. (ii) Inland Area Fellowship filed an application for the approval of modifications to conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -17 as described in the title of this P.esolution. Hereinafter., the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (iii) On the 14th of November, 1980, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. WOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commissioni of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: i. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct-. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented v this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on November 14, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Amethyst Avenue with a street frontage of 640 feet and lot depth of 365 feet and is presently improved with an existing building, paved perking areas, curb and gutter; and IE --at%, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89 -139A INLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP November 14, 1990 Page 2 Aft (b) The property to the north of the subject site is senior citizen housing, the property to the south of that site Insists of a single family residence, th, property to the east is developer with a post office; fire station and offices, anu the property to the was'. is a sfngl a family residence; and (c) The property is zoned "Medium Residential by the Development Code; and (d) The application contemplates the deferral of on -site improvements which were required to be completed prior to October 25, 1990; and ,r (e) The mature Pinus in'ltiata (Monterey Piney within the row of pain trees was accidentally bulldozed and was required to be replaced with a 24 -inch box size pinus Thumbergiana (Japanese Black Pine). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission_. during the above - referenced meeting a 13 upon the specific findings, of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 au.,ve, this Commission hereby finds and " concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code 9nd the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable chereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in corplience with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1930 and, -further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings aid conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby modifies its Resolution No. 89 -139 by modifying Plapting condition numbers 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 to read . as follows: n The vacant area north of the parking lot shall be kept free of weeds and treated with a soil sterila nt until it is landscaped with a native drought tolerant groundcover mix which shall be irrigated by a temporary Surface irrigation . Aft system.' Installation shall occur within one year of occupancy. r; 2. E -3) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89 -139A INLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP November 14, 1990 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST;: Brau Buller, Secretary 3. A - E4-Ettch- b" size shall be planted within the planter near the northwest ' cornek, of the building prior to occupancy. 4. A da�,orative block wall shall be chnstructed along the west property line from the future access point for the property to the west to the existing wall. Said wall shall be completed within two years of the date of occupancy or when the adjacent property develops, whichever occurs first. Detailed plans and elevations of the walls shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits for said walls. In addition, the applicant shall contact adjoining property owners to coordinate the removal of the existing chain link fence along the west, property line. s, All landscaping along Amethyst Avenue between the curb and the existing retaining wall shall be installed prior to occupancy. , 7. The proposed landscaping along the west property line shall be installed in conjunction with the construction of the decorative block wall within two years of occupancy of the building or when the adjacent property develops, whichever occurs first. Prior to landscaping, the area shall be kept free of weeds and treated with a soil sterilant. All landscaping within the parking lot shall be installed prior to occupancy. 8. The applicant shall file an application. with the Planning Division for consideration of the building as an Historic .Landmark prior to the construction of any new structures on the site. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST;: Brau Buller, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 89 -139A <, INLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP November 14, 1990 Page 4 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dale azi regularly ip.troduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of RazLft Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of November, 1990, by the following dote -to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: - NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: AML CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT f DATE: November 14, 1990 TO: Chairnian and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIVAL USE PERMIT 88 -19 PACIFIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES - The luest to nooi y a condition--of approval muting the number of employees for a medical office in a leased space of 16,856 square feet within an existing industrial office park on 1.57 acres of hand in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at 10837 Laurel Street - APN: 208 - 351 -57. I. BACKGROUND: On June 8, 1988, the Planning Commission approved Conditi ona Use Permit 88 -19. The resolution approving the use, No. 88 -112, contains a condition stating "This Conditional Use Permit 's approved for a maximum of 40 employees ", based upon available parking. When the applicant filed for permanent financing on their building, it was noted that a total of 54 employees are currently employed at the business, thus, the reason for the modification request. When Conditional Use Permit 88 -19 was under project review, staff noted a discrepancy between the number of parking spaces initially provided for the tenant space and the number of pari_ing spaces required for a medical office use. The resolution wf` approval conditioned modification to ' -^ approved Master . n for the - project site. The condition resulted in the dele -0on of one building, totaling 7,034 square feet of tenant space, and provided 27 additional parking spaces. II. ANALYSIS: The Laurel Aspen Business Park is a fully developed Office park containing four, trio -story buildings and one, one - story building, with a total of 96,088 square feet of tenant space and 443 parking spaces (see Exhibit "B "). Two of the buildings are currently occupied by medical uses, the three remaining buildings are vacant. The tenants are Pacific Physician Services, approved through Conditional Use Permit 88 -19, and Kaiser Foundation, approved through Conditional Use Permit 9043, 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -19 - PACIFIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES NOVEMBER 14, 1950 Page 2 The original condition limiting the number of employees permitted as part of Widitional Use Permit 88 -19 was provided as a means of controlling staff size to ensure an availability of parking for patrons of the medical office. With a total of 85 p77king spaces designated for the tenant space and a maximum of 54 employees, 31 parking spaces would theoretically be available far office patrons. Approval of the modification request will not add employees to the medical office as 54 persons are currently employed. The Development Code currently requires one parking space for each 2r square feel of tenant space for a medical office. As such.' modi-rtcation to Conditional Use permit 88=19 will conform to City parking requirements as project square footage has not changed from the original apppoval. To ensure adequate buffer is provided between the number of parking spaces provided and those actually available for office patrons,, the Commission may want to consider imposing additional parking requirements on the Conditional Use Permit. To demonstrate actual parking demand, staff conducted parking counts on four separate o.casions to determine the total nus+ber of parking spaces occupied during peak midmorning and mid - afternoon business hours. Parking counts were conducted at approximately 10:00 am and 3.00 pm on Monday, October 22, and Tuesday, October 23, 1990. On Monday, parking counts totaled 153 and 131 vehicles, while on Tuesday, parking crlunts totaled 149 and 136 vehicles. These totals represent an average parking space occupancy of 142 vehicles, or 32 percent of parking spaces within project bwindaries. project area approvals designate a total of 120 parking spaces, or 27 percent for medical uses; therefore, actual peak parking demand is a maximums of 33 parking spaces higher than approvals anticipated or an average of 22 parking spaces higher than approved. The following table summarizes building square t,,tages, parking ratios, and required parking spaces within Lau,e1 Aspen Business Park. F_ 0arking i Parking Square Parking Spaces Spaces Use l:ootage Ratio Required Provided Kaiser Found. 7,034 1/200 35 35 Vacant 27,671 1/250 111 - 1 Vacant 27,671 11250 111 - Pacific Phy. 16,855 ?00 85 85 Service Vacant 16,856 1/250 67 �- TOTAL 96,088 409 443 F_ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -19 - PACIFIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 3 Figures represented in the preceding table demonstrate there are r no parking deficiencies resulting from approvals within project s boundaries, However, the parking survey indicates there is substantial potential for conflict as parking spaces allowing for a buffer between spaces required and spaces provided are potentially occupied. The bottom nine is that there is sufficient parking for the existing medical uses, but is not likely to be available for future medical users. To ensure use and parking compatibility, Conditional Use Permit 88 -19 was conditioned "If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the. Conditional Use Permit shall be brought befora the P "canning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use." Thus, if the requested modification results in any hardship upon adjacent businesses, now or at any future time, it can be brought before the Commission for additional review and consideration. Further, any future requests for medical uses in this complex would only be considered upon detailed parking studies. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of i'he Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised -.- a public hearing in the n 3fi Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission apprcc_ modification to Conditional Use Permit 88 -19 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respe y su ted, /Bra Cit Planner BB: TG:ml g �- 3 PLANNING COMMISSIOk STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -19 - PACIFIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 4 Meachments; Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant t Exhibit "8 " - Site Plan Minutes; of June 8t 1988 Planning Commissfon meeting Planning Commission Staff Report of June 8, 1988 Resolution of Approval No. 88 -112 Recommending Approval Resolution of Approval No. 88 -112A a� i August 10, 1990 lum Grahn Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga ISO Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91734 i RE. ASPEN MEDICAL BUILDING, 10837 Laurel Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, APH #208•,351 -57 REF. CUM-19, June 7, 1988 Dear Mr. Grahn: Thank you very much for your assistance in guiding me through the process to file a revision of CUP 88-19. In reviewing our documentation related to the permanent financing of our facility, we recognize that the current level of employman4 there at 54, exceeds our original estimate of 40, as indicated in the CUP filing of June 10, 1987- Aft Accordingly, this CUP Application is filed as a modification thereof in order to be in compliance with the requirements of the City. It is our understanding that the current parking allocation for our facility is 85, hence, we are W in excess of the parking allotment related to said facility. Gum labels for the purpose of distribution of information for a Public Hearing to be held regarding this matter is enclosed herewith, along with a check in the amount of $485.00, the Application fee. Thank you again for your kind help. Very cordially yours, r ssett pr 81grahn , P er F-Wprr It It (r., T s l.cdlfG NO rZ9U4VAT14,,—t4 —7a Al"W o �� 0 4 ip b� S CI'T'Y OF tCfUCAMONO.;1 PI.t1NNNiIti -: Bi'VISIOIV , _ Y EY-H 1Tt SCALE: I E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL *St PERMIT 88 -19 . PACIFIC V - ins request to establ�ISR medical o tlee -S n a el ae sps`e of - 16,856 square feet within an existing industrial pack on 1.57 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea., 7), located at 10837 Laurel Street - APN 203 - 351 -57. Tom Grahnt Assistant Planner, v.,asented tht staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Dan Richard&. representing the applicant, concurred with the conditions of approval. Chairman McNiel asked if this use was in affiliation with one if the area hospitals. Mr. Richards responded there was no direct affiliation at this time. There were no further conknents, therefore the pt.:lic hearing was ;1osted. Commissioner Chitiea stated she would suppr:rt the request based on the developer's solution to eliminate one of fne buildings in order to accommodate the parking requirEments. Coronissioner Emerick stated his original concern was the pa king issue, Which he felt had been adequately addressed. Motion: Moved by Chitier,, seconded by Emerick, to adopt the Resolution approving Environmental -4ssessment and Conditional Use Permit 88 -19. Motion carried by the vote: A S: wt .iSSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIOKihs. CNITIEA, EYCniCK, MCNIEL NONE BLAKESLEY, TOLSTOY - carried F. ENV3'M" TAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMI'�? 38 -,{dP� JACKSON - Tfie 1'eque `estab i sh a hair so on n a space ot`�3 square feet witi existing multi -tens ustrial park on 7.09 acres oi, and in the strial District, located on the northeast corner of Haven Ave fd Acacia Street - APN 209-401 -01. Nancy Fong, Associate P1 , presented the report.. Chairman McNiel ened the public hearing. There were omments, therefore ublic hearing was closed. Planning Commission Minutes -6- June 8, 1988 DATE: To FWN: BY: SUBJECT: --- CITY OF RANCHO CU�;AMONOA STAFF REPORT r June 8, 1988 Chairman and Members of the Planring Commission grad Buller, City Planner Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PE IT 88 -19 e request to'esta5lisi' medical o Fices in a ease spate of 16,856 sluare feet within an existing industrial park on 1.57 acres of land In the Industrial Park District. (Subarea 7) located at 10837 Laurkil Street - APN: 208 - 351 -57. I. PROJECT AND SITE DkSCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a medical ff ce and t� i issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin North - scan , RaF•ry s es �,urant; Industrial Park South - Vacant; Industrial Park East - Vacant; Industrial Park West - County Lase and Justice Center; Industrial Park C. General Plan Desi nations: ro ec td -> In " us —rf-aT Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park - 0. Site Characterirties: The proposed use is located within an ex s n o , Rce pa—r&. There are current! three, out of an eventaal six, one and tiro -story garden office building;, on the aroJeet Site. 'Fre are no other tenants within this office park at this time. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Puking Spaces Spaces of Use 700taae (is___ tio Rem Provided Medical Office 16,856 1/200 as 68 0'Pice 16,856 1/250. 68 68 _g LJ 11 PLANNING COWISSIOu STArF REPORT CUP 88-19 - PACIFI HYSICIAN SERVICES June 8, 1988 Page 2 F. Applicable.Re ulations: The Industrial Area Specific Plan conditional perm s medical /health Care Services within the Industrial Park District ( Subarea 7). � II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Pacific Physician Services is proposiol to use one of e thr te existing buildings (approximately 26.56 square feet) within the Laurel Aspen Executive Office Pai-ek (see Exhibit "G" ). The proposed facility will house obstetricians, . pediatricians, family practitioners, and several other specialties. The tot0 number of employee3 will not exceed 40 persons and the hours of operation will °ae 8:30 A.M. to 55:30 P.M., % nday through Friday; however, after hours services can be made by appointment only. In assessing the availability of parking, a large discrepancy was noted between the number of parking spaces required versus the number of narking sp, ; es provided The Laurel Aspen Executive Office Park props es a total of six one and taco -sftyy garden office buildings and was parked to office standards iic a ratio of one space per each 250 square feet of gross floor area. gated on a floor area of 16,656 square feet, a total of 58 parking spaces were provided for this tenant space.: The proposed medical office requires a ratio of one space per 200 square feet of gross floor area, or & ~otal of 85 spaces, thus leaving a discrepancy of 17 parking spaces. Staff is concerned with this discrepancy and to mitigate the potential parking problems that may arise, a condition has been included In the Resolution that additional phases within this office park will be decreased in floor area a ^;ual in area to the additional parking requirements For this : .*se. 8.' «nvironmental Assessmenti Part I of the Initial Study has been C e y e app smut. Staff has completed Pert'll of the Enarironmental Checklist and has found no significant impacts on the envirom ent as a result of this project. II1. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industr^ia► Area Specific Ptar Subarea in which the site is located. PLANNING COMISSIOu STAFF REPORT CUP 88.19 PACIF: 'HYSICIAN SERVICES June % 1983 Page 3 Z. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or Improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions. of the InduS'_rial Area Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENM This item has been advertised as a public hearing ni_ia�=Repo_r_t newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to a property ty owners within a 300 foot radius, -,the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission l approve ove° lions tonal Use rmit 88 -2D through adoption of the ttache resolution. `E fi t ! j Resp ut icy . W ted, I Brad Buller City PTanner BB:,TG:te 1 i Attachments: letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Parcel Asap No. 9103 Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Building "C" Floor Plan Exhibit 'E" - 'proposed Floor Plan' - Resolution of _Approval PACIFIC PI SICIAN SERVICES May 18, 1988 .. 'I care you un live with 0 Director of Planning City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FE: CUP Processing 10837 Laurel Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Sir: Pursuant to your request, this letter is submitted in support of the request of Apsen Medical Building for a CUP at this particular location in order to utilize thi'; previously constructed building for medical purposes. The buil& ag at this location is ideally designed and suited for medical use. It is unique, in that its style differs substantially from ot.he.r office buildings in the area, and lends itself to a more pleasing, relaxed nature asso- ciated with the medical practice. The facility will house obstetricians, pediatricians, family prac- titioners, and several other specialties. It .is anticipated that the total number of employees shall not be greater than 35 to 40, and the hours of operations will be 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.# Monday through Friday, with after hours services by appointment only. Also enclosed, per your request, are floor plans for the first and second floor of the facility z* your review. We look forward to presenting our project to you on June 8, 1988, at your next planning meeting. In the meantime, should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly. Thank you for your confideration. Very Lossett Enc#1 ure: 5 Copies of Floor Plan cc Virginia LaRosa Jack Corrigan c44aspwn ,l 12 North fifth Street • Redlands, California 92373 • (714) 825 -4401 Off CITY OF ITEM: -Af ffo - I I RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: loo A&V a -HI I PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBI SCALE: -i �-- PARCEL MAP NO. 910:5 0 TKI CITY OR MANCNO r WONOA a, Imco" c toc �Wf "fscQwlT M► a►radf p%,!s � ailgx d fwr 10.4 Nccgitxr w *N4. cg171r1 M tY ri►NM7pN frgfq tlf CiGfMNtt 1..�ik`1. ist 44.Hl\ oat"$$ M ■02 asts w, eisorcr;is A�,r.w.us►t •••-•• r.•re•we •.ra• � qtin.... ,Wkf .I S zz �iri ea /.rt.as N • •; if 4 1 q� l� '•a. - z`:e',,,r• r ter/ qlVp ` M �4 •ice V NORTH STY OF ITEM RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: 0Aov fiat T- PLANNING DIVISION -- 1;3 EX1IBIT SCALE: i�� 11 PLANNING DIVISION .i w rW w� ITEM TITLE: EXHIBITS.,. SCALE: ti z Cif OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DI`i'ISION F tb 7-Z 7CL G ^ V,I O O J LL LL O o3 Lu A V ITEM: ' ej� -R. U Z V Q X � U e Q TITLE: Lam- FLN . �1 O& (� �(Oc!+ ) �L� j EXHIBIT: SCALE: �. ' I.G. � , Y �/.�•. 1 1 �. M� ,•• Off• - 0•J...J {/L �. .Y�.��. -- "'' v — . it Kc nil I 1 I OTY OF ITEM RANCHO PLANNING i I I N F-1,7- EXHIBET :� SC*A' M m CITY )F RAN' R'O CUCAMONGA PLANNING r -VISION -7t i I d. U ITEM: TITLF,:. EXHIBIT: SCALE-. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -112 A RESOLUTION OF THE R. AO CUCAMONGA PLANNIba COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL ,5E PERMIT NO. 88 -19 FOR A MEDICAL ` OFFICE LOWED AT 10837 LAUREL STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRIOI, SUBAREA 7, APN: 208 - 351 -67 A. Recitals. M Pacific Physician Services has filed art application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -19 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred tows "the application ". (ii) On the 8th of June, 1588, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby iaund, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho T.ucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set foy h in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidev,.:e presented to this Comimission during the above - referenced public haa.ring on June 8, 1988, including written and )ral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spw.1ficaliy finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 15,856 square feet of leasable space on property located at 10837 laurel Street. Said property is developed with three buildings and associated parking; and (b) The applicant proposes to operate a medical office Monday %-: °augh Friday from 8:30 A.M. to 5 :30 P.M., with after hours services by appointment only. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearn;; and upon the specific finditgs of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Comeaission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purpones of the district in which the site is located. F-) 'T PLANKING COPMtISSI 3ESOLUTION NO. cup sa -ig - rici 1C PHYSiCIAN SERVICES June 8, 1988 Page 2 (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to propertie3 or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed Lisa complies with each of the applicable provision, of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered iF compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1470 and, further, this Commission `hereby issues a negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings .nd c)nclusions set forth in Naragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set torth below and in the attached Standard Condition!; attached hereto and,incorporated herein by this reference. (1) Any modification, expansion, or other change in operation will require a revision to the Conditional Use Permit. (2) Approval of this request shell not waive compliance with all sections of the In&''trial Area Specific Plan, and all other Ci�y Ordinances. (3) If the operation of the facility -tr,*;es adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or ni",ea" -ns, the Conditional Use Permit shall bm Brought i,vfore the Planning Commission for the zonsiderdtion and possible termination of the use. (4) Occupancy of the facility shall no._ commence until such time as all Uniform Building +code aW State Fire Karhsall's regulations have been complied with. Dior to occupancy, plans shall be iabmit�ed do the Foothill Fire protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shalt be inspected for compliance rrior to occupancy, (5) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sian Ordinance, any Uniform Sign Program for the complex, and small " equire review avid approval by the Planning Divisio: prior to installation. (6) This Conditional Use Permit is approved for a maximum of forty (40) employees. T' —mod PLANNING C"ISSIr" RESOLUTION NO, CUP 88 -19'• PACK PHYSICIAN SERVICES June 8, 1988 Page 3 (7) Approval of this use will Mlmire a reduction in the approved square footage for additional phases squdl tO the firea required for the additional 17 parking spaces. 6. The Depety Secretary to this Commission shall certifrx to the adoption ,,W this Resolutien. APPROVED "'M ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLA!JIiING COWISSION OF n-'E CIrV OF RAI HO CUCAMONGA BY; /,' )¢ C ✓� t �r car ,�.� - Z:a�`ri i�� rmn ATTEST: a u epu to ` I, sid Butler, Deput'. Secretary of the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucawaga, Jo h_reby certify that the .`bregoing Resoli��Jon. was duly and regul'.irly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning omnistion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Negular saetir_g of the Planning Cosa ssion held on the 8th day of Junp, 1988, by the f0 lowilg vote- to-Wt: AYES: CJ6 SSIONERS' CHITIEA, EMERICK, 1CNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, TOLST07 Ask +I - i i I RESOLD; -IN 0, 88 -112A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCFi3 CUCAMONGA, CAL,''FORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION TO ^� CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT NO. 88 -14 rOR A MEDICAL OFFICE LOCATED AT 10e37 LAUREL STREi T IN THE INDUS AI'AL PARK DISTRICT, SUBAREA 7 OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN. ARID MAKING FINDINGS TO SUPPORT THEREOF v RPN: 205- 351 -57. A. Recitals. (i) Pacific Physician Services has filed an application for modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -19 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject . Conditiona` Use Permit regepst Is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 14th of November 1990, the Planning C+�mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conductd a duly noticed {,public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date, (iii) On the 8th of June, ;988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly notice public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing on that date, ani: issued a Negatfve Declarction. NO All legal prerequisites prior to the adop±tF%r of this Resolu:` +on have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, VEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning rommission of the City of rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Co mission hereby specifically finds tha, ail of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Feet A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantla: evidence pr,,ented to this Conmission during the :!cove- refemnced pu''? c hearing on N"emmber 14, 1990, includi4 writt•.n and oral staff reports, t6:,�4her with public testimony, this Commission hereby apbcificarly finds as €oliows: (a) vhe applicaw'i,n applies to 16,856 square feet of leasable space on proper.y located at 108,17 Laurel Street. Said property is developed with five b«il dings and associated narking; and (b) The .applicant proposed to operate medical office with 54 employees, .,._._y tt rough Fviday', ;rcr1 8:30 a.m, to 5s30 p.m., with after hours sere,.g;t Only. .4, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO`. SS-112A CUP 88 -19 - PACIFI' PNYSI•.IAN SERVICES November 14, 1990 Page 2 (c) The current peak parking demanj is 153 parking so.ices and the site has a total of 443 spjaces. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence- presented to th *, Commission during t.�.e above- rrLfsrenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of fasts set forth in pa- zgraph5 1 and 2 above, tnis Commission hereby finds and ,:c-icludes as follows: j (a) That the proposed use is in e7cord with he General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the 'purposes of the'distr{ct in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the riblic he;0th, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each cF the applicable provisions of the Development. Cade, 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this C(,+m`ssiion hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: AlMh 1) All conditions of approval -- contained in Planning 1 Commissie, Ac.3olution No. 88 -112, except Conditi a. 6 which is modified by this approval, shall apply. 2 Thi= Conditional Use, Permit ss approved for a maxitrdm of 54 employees. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO- CUC;SONGA BY: Larry . c e , Chairqan ATTEST: ra. d Bu or, Secretary r PL.04AG C©MrSSION RESOLUTION No. 88 -ilgA CUP 49 -19 - PAC FIG PHYSICIAN SERVICES - November 14, 1990 Page 3 I, Brad Huller, Secretary ref the Planning Connission of the Cit.f of Ran2t:; Cucataonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning CoN;Aission neld on the 14th day of November 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONSRS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I' I F "--2 REAL ESTATE MELOPMEHT Inland Empire Dlvl wf November 14, 1990 Chairman and Planning Commissioners City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Re: Item G - Modification Tract 10035- Calprop Dear Chairman and Planning Commissioners: Calprop is hereby rasquesting that Item G on the Planning, Commission Agenda of November 14th be continued until the December 12th, 1990 Planning Commission meeti:g. The continuance would give us a better opportunity to resolve the issue with staff. Thank you for consiOeration of this request. sinzerely, CALPROP CORPORATION i ohn Boggs Vice President, Operations JB:gk:itemg 440 H. Mountain Avenue, Suite 205, Upland, Callfornia 9'71316 o (71e" 949.11()0 FAX NUMBER- (714) 339.2290 D DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: I. C CITY OF W NCHO CUCAAN',ONGA STAFF RL;FO ,T November 14, 1990 Chairman and Members +mf the Planning Commission Dan James, Senior Civil Enginaer Judy Acosta, Engineering Technician MODIFICATIC TO TRAuT NO. 10035 CALPROP - A request to Mete a coe dition of approval requiring all r veways to be r, maximum of 24 feet wide per City Standard No. 305 for lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14 -17, 20 and 21 for a previously approved tract consisting of 38 single femily lots on 15.7 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling ►inits per acre), located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calla Corazon - APW:' 207- b31 -01 thrru 11 and 207 - 641 -0 thru 10 B "1CKGROUHD The tentative tract was approved by the Planning Commmission on March 25, 1981 and approved For final map, improvement, agreement and security by Council on March 20, 1985. On January 24, 1990, tar„ design review of building elevations, detailed site plan and various reduced front yard setback for lots 1 th,,u 21 were approved by the Planning Commission with special conditions added to the previously approved conditions of approval. T;;e added conCition that all driveways shall be a,maxiwum of 24 feet was included even though. City Standard No. 305 sets driveway widths of 16 and 24 feet for '2 and•3 car garages respectively. The Daveloper is requesting that said condition requiring a maximum of 24 feet driveway width, be deleted. Staff wants to point_ out that even if the Planning Commission deletes this condition from the special conditlans� it doesn't change the fact that the City Standard Drawings still sets the maximum width o:° 24` for 3 car garages. The Standard Drawings are established by the City Engineer and City Council per City Ordinance, `7ne Developer is requesting that they be permitted to exceed thw maximum +iidth because of the cross slope condition and reduced front sethwks for the 14 lots previously mentioned. The Developer statas that several 3 car ITEM G J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TR I0035 CALPROP NOVEMBER 14, 1490 PAGE 2 AM garaw door faces are 17 feet from the curb. Tht standard curb cuts. is 4 feet narrower than the edge to edge distance oti the gars\ge'. doors and 8 :Meet narrower, than the on -site driveway. 111thout greater backing distance vehicles need to begin r. turning movement while still In the garage to negotiate the ;mrrow apron width. This turning movement is compounded by being" a back,Fng movement .over a cross slope condition. The Developer believer. this ,situaation j'arrants r waiver of our standard to be more convenfert for vehicular o,ieration than adhering to our. standard for the ftximum width drive approach. Also included in the Engi =:aering standard ft the 40% rule. The standard st ;tes tha+> the maximan width of thc' drive approach cannot, exceed 40% of ' the `total frontage of the lot. The drivewAys as proposed, exceed.<the 40% of total frantagc:`width. Any waiv r of the Standard Drawfngs requires Cif Council ;action. At this t`me, Staff recc rends that the rnauest for 'tile deletion or the condition from the Special Conditinns be denied, thus keeping the Deve;oper from pwrsu'Jng t'4s request any further. Il. RECO'.-ANDATION: It is recommended that ih^ Planning Commission dziny the modification, request for tract 10035 through adoption 6f the attached resolution. Respectfully submitted, Dan Jiviff Senior Civil Engi,2Ar L\I :JAA :d1 w Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Tract Niap 10035 Resolution of Denial Letter of Request W A R K E N T l W R A f G H T ,gill tf l r'K�, :;, r September 13, 1990 �h'il4YAre''It� ti TO: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Commission Larry McNie^l, Chairman Suzanne Chitea, Vice Chairman Betsy Winberger Commissioner Peter Tolstoy, Commissionur John Melcher, Commissioner PROM: John Brooks Warkentin Wraight RE: The G&bles (Our Project No. 89014) Revision to Dosign Reviews Tract 10035 4 Variance 89 -12 PROPOSED: To delete Engineering Division Stem S2 from the conditions of :approval and add a recommendation that the aptvon widths in the public ROW match the previously approved on -a�' o wive widths for Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 6. 7, 8, SC, 12, 14 - 17, 20 a 21, waiving City Standard *305 for saaid lots. DISCUSSION: Previously we were granted a number of 'variances due to site considerations. These variances carried with them implications as stated in Planning Commission Resolution $90 -16, Sec. 8 a, b, i & c. I "That strict or literal intexpretattion and enforcement. of the spec fied raigulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with th" objectives of the Development Code. That there are except.', --nal or entraordinary circumstances or conditions applirable to the property involved or to the intended use of tho property that do not apply generally to other proparties in the sane district. That than strict or literal in ,arpretation and enforcement o:0 the specified regulation would depr've the appllosnt of privSlages injoy2d by tht owners of ether properties in the same district," September 13, 1990 Revision to Cosign Review � Traci: 10033 & Variance 89 -12 Page 2 of 2 We come to yot. once ,again for consideration of a waiver of standards that should have been included in the original ;onditic:ns of Approval, lout through an -iveralght, was} omitted. Variance B61--12 provided far reduced front yard setbau)cis. The unique site condiitiona made chis a necessity. City Standard 4305 provides for set driveway wtdths of 18' and 241 for 2 and 3 car garages respectively. These widths work we it on level cites with standard setbacks. However our cross elope conditiop and reduced front setbacks memo garage acoesslb4lity literally Impossible if strict interpretation -af the standard is adhered to on the 14 lots listed above. In many canoe 3 car garage door faces are 17' -0" from the Carb. The standard curb cut is 41 -0" narrower than the edge to edge distance at' the garage doors and 8' -011 narrower than the acs- site, driveway. Without greater backing distance vehicles need Co beg n, a turning movement while still in the garage to neegot' ato the narrow apron width. This 'turning movement is compounded by 'being a backing movement ovv-- a cross slope condition. This is clearly a situation that warrants a wa :. '. sr of this normal standards and such waiver will result in a" safer and more convenient vehicular operation than that resulting from the strict application of this standards. Through an oversight on our part we did not realize the impact of the 6ta2 ',AiGrd when reviewing the conditions of approval. We regret having_ Ito consuaeees more of your time but feel it necessary for the proper, execution of the designs you so raad3ly approved ssevo*al months ago. With your endorsement we intend to approch the City Council for a waiver of City. Standard ,x305. Thank you for your consideeratAOn. CC: John Boggs /Calprop Corporation Tim MImMack /M1mMack Engineering Steve Hayes, Staff Planner /City of Rancho Cucamonga Judy Acosta, Staff Engineer /City of Rancho Cucamonga Ll 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CGMMISSION W THE CITY OF Y RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A• DELET;OM: OF A CONDITION FROM THE CONDITIO;Z OF APPROVAL FOR TRACT 10035, LTATED SOUTH AND EAST OF RLD HEL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SOUTH OF CALLE COPLUON, AND M ILYING FINDINGS IN IVPPORT THEREOF - APR: 207 5531.11 THRU 11 AND 207 - 641 -01 1HRU 10 W',;:REAS, on 5cptember 20, 1y90, a request for a deletion of conditions .:as tiled by CALPRcOP Corpovation for the above stated project. WHEREAS, on the 14tN day of November, 1990, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission considered deleting a condition from the conditions of approval. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMRSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: That they request for deleting. Fngineuri,�g Division Condition No. 2 from Resolution No. 90 -15 be deni4d, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOVGA BY: Larry T. REN1 e , C-,iai man ATTEST: Brad aw er, 5_%cretary I, Brad Buller -, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereb.7 certify that the foregoing Resoiution was duly and regularly introduced, pasr °d, and - adopted by the Pl aktning Commission oo the City of Rancho Cucamonga tit a regular meeting of the t'lanning CWnnissiun held on the 14th day of NoverAer, 199u, by the following mot .1- o -wit: AYES; COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t CITY OF RANCHO CUQ'XONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, THIS LETTER IS TO ADDRESS THE PROPOSED BUILDING OF APAAITMENT BUILDINGS ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AND BASELINE. I HAVE BEEN EMPLOYED AS A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FOR A MAJOR POLICE DEPARTMENT IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY FOR THE PAST FOURTEEN YEARS. WITH REGARD TO MY PAST EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE, I RAISE THE 071W,-TING CONCERNS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. TO ALLOW RENTAL UNITS TO BE BUILT ADJACENT TO THE VROPOSED CITY 55 ACRE PARK WOULD JEOPARDIZE THE SAFETY OF THE PARK. IT WOULD PRESENT A LAW ENFOREEMENT PROBLEM NOT ONLY TO THE PARK, BUT ALSO TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS. PARKS NOTORIOUSLY ATTRACT A MYRIAD OF LAW ENFOZCEt' ?NT PROBLEMS. DRUGS, ASSAULTS, SEX CRIMES, AND THEFTS COMMONLY PLAGUE THE PARKS OF COMMUNITIES. WITH RENTAL UNITS LOCATED ACROSS THE STREET, THESE PROBLEMS WOULD INCREASE DRAMATICALLY. INNER CITY GANGS ARE SPREADING THEIR DRUG ORGANIZATIONS NOT ONLY TO CITIES OUTSIDE OF LOS ANGELES, BUT ALSO TO OTHER STATES. HAVING NON -OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING IN SUCH A VULNERABLE. SITE WOULD ENCOURAGE SUCH AN ENCR3ACHMENT. ONCE ESTABLISHED, THIS TREND WOULD CREATE A SPREADING NEGATIVE IMPACT THAT WOULD BE DIFrICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO CORRECT. WITH THE CAREFUL PLANNING THAT HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED IN THE PLANNING OF A POSITIVE COMMUNITY, DON'T JEOPARDIZE THIS FINE COMMUNITY IN SUCH A SENSITIVE AREA. t DUE TO A TIME CONFLICT WITH MY WORK SCHEDULE, I AM UNABLE "'0 ATTEND THE MEETING. ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 14TH. I MOPE THE CONCFRNS I RhISED WILL HAVE IMPACT ON THE BOARD TO NOT GRANT PERMISSION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF RENTAL AT THIS LOCATION. FINCE -ELY, PAUL HENRY 11482 GENOVA ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA PHONE (714) 944 -8543 Chaffay Joint Union High School ►..strict 211 WEST FiFTH STREET, ONTAPIO. CALIFORNIA 91762-1698 (714) 9x6.6511 "s SUPERINTENOEN' OFS0;COt.3 r,bOC1A'fESUPERWTEN:'ElYT BOARD .'!EMSEIiS Man E Smomnrs 1WMUCn OH Ka ✓.IIKn E. KI W; + ®aft 0, Hamm - - - 84 C Martin postal�� ASSSTANT SUPERWTENCENT RaY^ao J. sotto 4 MRSOMEL chunk J. UhaWy nd Oad E Cdp Geaks W. WOtt Ma- 17. 1990 Lincoln Property Company 4330 La Jolla Village Orive Suite 240 San Diego, CA 92122 Attn: Martin Garrick Re:, Marvilla Project, Basaline and Milliken This is to con"irm that we have received your letter of May 14, 1990 informing us that Lincoln Company has decided not to inclt,de subject project in Chaffey District's Community Facilities District #1 but, instead, oa exercise your option of paying cash your "School Facilities Obligation" purvuant to the Mitigation Agreement as of this date yet to be executed. The amount of that School Facilities Obligation, pursuaa►t tiro t:iz Mitigation Agreement, will be. $1,800 per unit for single famj<y Cwellings.'31. `^0 der unit for townhouses and condominiums. and $85 per unit for aoartments. Sincerely, S T EPyEN L. W." 'E. ; Director Business Servicep SLB/cw cc. Bill Kadi t 'tCJWOt3. AtM LOW • i'KOWKY A=T EW)CATION • CHAFM • emAwk . M"ITCI A • ONTARIO . VALU,VEW 0701 -02 O 11- 14-90 PC Agenda 4 of 6 CJ IN, VI NI m 2MM — lung 1AW a 11s Ila fig! 11 Y .III Ila OM 120 se yry 121 122 — E-4 it E=4 124 125 126 127 35. 19 40 41 DATE; TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF R -ANCHO CUCAMONG4 STAFF REPORT November 14, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Butler, City Planner Steve Hayes, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AqD VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14630 4 ii\NVi..ly rmirami T wmrmT - ine oeveicpment ou-3'N condominium units on 20.15 acres of land in the Medium High Residential District (14 -24 duelling units per acre) in the Victoria Planned Community, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue AF'N: 227 - 691 -01. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval r^ subdivision map, site plan, gra Ung pan, andscape plan, evations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 16,3 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning- North - Single Family Residential; Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant; Neighborhood Commercial East - Vacant; Low - Medium Residential (4 -+ dwelling units per, acre) West - Vacant; Central Park Site D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) North - Law- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) South - Neighborhood Commercial East - Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Park E. Site Characteristics: The site, which slopes approximately three to Tour percent from north to sout,l, is vacant with remnants of a former vineyard. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 2 F. P—kino Calculations: Total Units: 328 Unit Mix - I bedroom 112: 2 bedrooms 1S4 3 bedrooms 32 Parking Regcired: 112 X 1.5 = 168 184 X 1.8 = 331 32 X 20 64 328 X 0.25 = 82 Total Parking Spaces Required 645 Parking Provided Enclosed Garage, 3G0 Open (stands ~d) 230 (1pen (compact) 56 Total Pa rking Spac:_zs Provided 646 Ii. BACKGROUND: On June 13, 1990, the Planning commission took action 1 on both 'Jesting Tentative Tract 14630 and Conditional Use Permit 90 -05 for the Lincoln Property proposal. the latter permit would have allowEd a 4 percent increase in the a!'lowable percentage of de. one- bedroom units for the project (maximur, 35 percent under the Victoria Community Plan). The recommendation for approval was automatically denied 'on a 2 -2 -1 vote. The applicant subsequently filed a request for reconsideration of the tentative map for Planning Commission review. The Planning - Commission voted in favor of the reconsideration request cn July 11, 1990. III. ANALYSTS. A. General: The project contains four different unit types (two one - bedroom, one two- bedroom, and one three - bedroom floor plans) ranging in size fron 706 to 1,111 square feet. The units are arranged in six different building types ranging in unit count fram 8 to 16 units per building. All building types are two - story. Parking is provided in enclosed garages and open parking stalls. A perimeter drive serves as the primary circulation system for vehicles within the project. On -site amenities include a recreation building, tennis ;;oust, tot lots, pools, spas, and open greenbelts that can be used for play areas. Security gates are provided at both vehicular project entrances. ft �L V PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NTT 14630- LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 3 B. Planning Commission Issues: When the project originally came "t . up or omm ss on review, several issues and concerns were expressed, The Commission noted that the entire architectural scheme needed upgrading (based on its proximity to Central Park), carports should not be used, a perimeter wall or fence might be appropriate, the request for an increase in the number of one- bedroom units allowed was of concern, acid details of the acoustical barriers for the patios and decks should be reviewed. These issues have been addressed as follows: 1. The architectural scheme has been revised 6"d recommended for approval by the Desigo Review Committee„ pending the comDletion of several minor details which are included as Conditions of Approval in the attached Design Review Resolution. 2. As mentioned previously, all carports have been eliminated. 3. Portions of the perimeter wall along Base tine Road and Milliken Avenue have been mcOifi ^.d to the Standard Victoria Plan theme wail (slumpstoht with pilasters), 4. Lexan will be utilized as the sound attenuation device for individual patios and units facing Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue. 5. Only 34 percent of the units are now proposed as one- bedroom units, which is 1 percent under the maximum allowed by the Development Code. Therefore, a Conditional Use Permit is no longer necessary. C. Neighborhood Issues: In addition to the Planning Commission's esign issues, ere was considerable public testimony and- concern with the project. The residents in the surrounding neighborhood were concerned that the site was being developed with rental units and not with a for -sale product, the density was too high, builders had not properly disclosed to buyers that the land was intended for multi - family, the project would deNtrimentally impact lo�.al schools, and that traffic, noise, and crime would increase in the area. Since that time, the applicant has worked -with the neighborhood to address the previously mentioned concerns. Through a series of neighborhood meetings, the applicant has attempted to address the neighbors concerns by; 1. Eliminating all three -story buildings. 4's PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT M 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 4 Aft 2. Reducing the number of 16 unit buildings from eight to two. In addition, these buildings have been plotted in the center of the site to reduce impacts on adjacent properties. 3. Providing security gates at both project entrances. 4. Eliminating all carpor`os; all required covered spaces are encloses garages. 5. Modifying the architecture to reduce the "hotsl" appearance. At the last neighborhood meeting of October B, 1990, the citizens of the neighborhood were generaliy in favor of the design modifications proposed by the developer, which were in accordance with previous meetings comments. However, the primary issue of land use has not been resolved.' The neighborhood still feels that the site should be developed with single family detached homes. D. Design Review Committee: The Committee' (Mckiel, Melcher, o eman ) reviewed the revised plans and forwarded the project to the full Commis,Ion with the following recommendations: i 1. Extensive landscaping, berming, and /or low walls should be providod along Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road to screen the parking areas and garages. 2. The norther�imost garage along Milliken Avenue should be i relocated off the street frontage. 3. Seating areas should be provided along the main pedestrian spine. 4. Exposed aggregate /retardant finish should be provided for the pedestrian spine. The walk should be a minimum of five feet in width. 6. A second tot lot should be provided to serve the southern portion of the site. 6. Interlocking paver bands should be provided along the main drive aisle at key locations to emphasize sidewalk connections and add interest to the drive aisle. i. Building 20 (at the east entry) should be skewed +o the southwest to provide more open space /landscaping across from the entry. K Il PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CTT 14630 - LINCOLN PnOPERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 5 8. A minimum 5 -foot landscaped parkway adjacent to the right .� turn pocket on Milliken Avenue was provided on the grading plan. The other plans will be revised to be consistent with the grading plan. 4. Usable landscape areas should be provided between all garages and sidewalks. 10. The Victoria entry monument design should be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee. 11. The applicant should study the possibilities of making the pedestrian connection to the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road more formal. 12. The spacing of the pilasters used with the wrought iron fencing should be consistent with the spacing used elsewhere in Victoria;. 13._ The materials sample board shou'"Id be submitted for additional Committee review. Of particular concern were the colors of the stucco and trim. 14. More articulation should be provided within the belly band across the buildings. The same detail should be used for the window sills. 15. Stucco wrapped trim should be provided around the patio sliding glass doors. 16. The bathroom windows on the entry elevations should be recessed. 17. Lexan should be used in place of plexiglass to achieve necessary sound attenuation along Milliken Avenue and _ Rase tine Road. 18. Additional wood trellises should be provided over balconies and /or entries. Also, the applicant - should explore the use of the trellis with breaking the ridge of the 400 plan. 19. A perspective of the gable element adjacent to the entry of the 400 plan should be provided for additional Committee review. 20. Particular attention should be paid to the screening of utility meters (i.e., gas, electric).. PLANNING CO "1MSSSION STAFF REPORT VTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 6 The applicant then resubmitted revised plans based on theme. previous meetings issues. The Design Review Committee (Mc Niel, Coleman) again reviewed the project an October 18, 1990. The items from the above list that were not addressed to the satisfaction of the Committee have been incorporated into the attached Design Review Resolution as Conditions of Approval. 2. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the i, project on October 2, 1990, and determined that, with the recommended special conditions and attached standard conditions of approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. The .Grading Committee conceptually approved the project on October 1, 1990. F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Part II of the Environmental Checklist, completed by staff, found that although the project may have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study have been j added to the project approval. 1. Noise: the project is subject to significant noise impacts along Base line Road and Milliken Avenue. A preliminary acoustical study has been prepared which identifies mitigation measures (,sound barriers) needed to bring the site into conformance with City noise standards. The project is designed without a perimeter wall along Base Line Road or Milliken Avenue„ Therefore, patios and balconies will require their own sound wall. Patio sound walls must be 6 feet 5 inches f6 feet on Base Line Road) and balcony sound walls must be '6 feet (5 feet 5 inches on Base Line Road). The elevations as reviewed by Design Review Committee did not address this elements hence, a condition has been -added to go back to the Design Review Commmittee prior to issuance of building permits. A final acoustical report will be submitted (Condition No. 2) to identify precise measures which must be incorporated into the final project design. 2, Schools: In accordance with Urgency Ordinance No. 395, s *r received written input from the affected school districts. Both the Etiwanda and Ghaffey Joint Union High School Districts indicated that inadequate capacity will exist to handle the students generated by this project tsee Exhibit "G °). Both Districts recommend participating in a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District to provide funding to mitigate the need for additional school facilities [see Condition No. l). �-6 •I O PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTr 14630 LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY Nevember 14, 1990 Page 7 3. Pedestrian Safety: The site is located across Milliken venue from the future City Central Park which will tend ~. to draw pedestrians across that heavily traveled road at mid- block. Therefore, as a mitigation measure, the applicant must, as a Condition of Approval (see Engineering Division Condition No. 1) reconstruct the Milliken Avenue median landscaping to discourage mid- block pedestrian crossing. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Victoria Community Plan and the General Plan, and will not be detrimental to adjacent p.nperties or cause significant adverse impacts. The proposed use, building design, and subdivision, together with all recommended Conditions of Approval, is in compliance with applicable regulations of the Development Code and the Victoria Community Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the n a—n- Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper- the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners k in 300 feet of the project Site and within an expanded notifica m area. VI. :RECOMMENDATION: The City Council has determined that this project should be: sub ect to the recently adopte-' amendment to the Victoria Community Plan which requires Council review and approval of any density increase. Therefore, if the Planning Commission supports the project, the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council should be adopted. If th,2 Planning Commission cannot support the project, then a Resolution recommending denial should be forwarded to the City Council. mfr BB :SH /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Vesting Tentative Map Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations Exhibit "G" - Correspondence from Affected School Districts Staff Report dated August 8, 1990 Staff Report dated duly 11, 1990 Staff Report dated June 13, 1990 Resolution Recommending Approval for VTT 14630 with Conditions Resolution Recommending Approval for VTT 14630 with Conditions �� 7 n� ' �� ?h I' /3 �� ,�� y� ► ^� qty • ��:yt:ry1 9 f.•:• L j �.` `.fir - .+ w _ f2- l^ WA x -_�'!i -� -� � 1.._°i3` -j 9 �•: � :Jed 1� } � YN y. BlIl9EGYaY4tt ! t •ti g$ -� ri � � {'.. F.:� �� •fit � .. >•.. .,.+. ,.. .., '; � ' C�x7 � --- :' w `�rr -,� •* `l ..,z•• " �. to "�tr•'� r=' � Y as a°a • s ; �� y� +,� �� 1 .r r s 1° 12° i •� 'i i c .y tea? J j 92 aj4�e- "�-��- 4K is5 FV�T 9. a4.a r _';'3^^!"1ffi -1 �•? . ' y�, t2 t 24 ` { ++�rvarw�avuremearria 43 om w 12 8 y° tiD t T UWT TOTAL a» I I"t'EArt: ViT 1463 M C 4F C`�i ..gUCAMONGA PLi dWNC'r DWMION TITLE: Srk dim., (WSTWG TeMTIve Twcr MAP) CITY OF _ UC.�11/[C?ie1GA PLAN ION 1 E E FT�1V1: Vff IYM TME: J&,4jja -f&v+ M4 HN MUM: C SCALE: as Ad LJ `J r CI ll Y OF UCAMONGA rtEM: 3 PLANT %I I7 SION TrrLE GADtMG P N EXHIBM p SCALE: ds 11 E E f r. p'� .�y Tai per. ,q �pp�e .pT�pr��R+. `J 1y4�� 4 OF * 6J\.+6'LLVlONGA 11ii+SS: P DUN. D ION E7CHMrr: F -(;"SCALE: _ -s% L 4ft- 1. CITY OF* �UC�MONGA ITEM: _ Z sv PLANNP0- ia.'YSION Trn E: &,a,,;; v- 1.4 N EXHIBrT"`F -q% SCALE: / � I I L�I II 0,-� Y T� �I I� i U Q U i 1 ' i� i g a n v G ,s Cif - S Ll V O u Uy NN UU lz w O� Y E E a_ 1. OD 4,-:2-e .—r . n f v v S 'G CA h s R O �O x U d U N A C� a os �r P 4 a a a a a R,z �. L rQ C:1 0 tS a1 l C y VC 9 [+1 V U J r V1 w Ii L O� U 0 U U 0_ 0 ry 0 Q U qw U: - n I i _ -_ � y o RI Li T-r 10 � I o O O P, :V LJ FEE R S mLMMEN [P=TAMIR e uarr... -- 9450 PA -M0-- ig90 MALE ?,f— teLI I `y`� Miv�:!•7T 1 H63o C OF' UCAMONGA 'rTi't. N. : PLANT %Rtc;- DMSIOIiT j r r� N EXHIB:T:'F -lo' SCALE: - �, . > �' 4y .1 ti � d i.' 9. � "� y 1Y a- �5 Y � �+ y,� ' t' .# , M �+:_ �� -�� G ,� r � Y� E u PLAN Lwrr - q4Dt PAL90 --- Jq3I 1 1 OF r�i uc�NG�. 'I.AN1iNCa- i�^IO1V 'TTiL: Flo' P an C Pia^ g' EXMff-'�� «, SCALE: -f m Ml CMULMMIN PATIO --- 4►LCOMF- IIG � i i CITY Op fW HKkUCANI®NGA TTrLE: ,FlooY- pla-, (PI82 3 ) PL ANMI46: Ei ION <F r 1I EXHEBri'r -r. SCALE: r- N t�ffiff MOP �,. F.O. Box 248, Etiwantla, California 91739 (714) 839-24511 December -1, 1989 b� Mr. Brett Hurner, Assistant Planner Community Development Department City of Rancho Cucamonga, Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Mr. Horner: SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14ENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14630- e development of con am,nium units on 20.15 acras of an in the Medium -Hi Slit Density Residential District in the Victoria Planned Community, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue -- APH: 227- 691 -01. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 395, please be informed that the Etiwanda School District would be willing to enter into a Mello-Roos district with the developer to mitigate the need for additional school facilities. The other mitigation procedure the district would accept would be an agreement front the developer to pay square footage fees on all habitable space, plus a special district assessment of approximately $2,000 per dwelling unit. Either of these measures would be considered satisfactory to tF,e district in- the mitigation of the iepact upon the c'pacity of our school Sincerely. Carleton P. Lightf I Superintendent CPL:rg ! Board of Truat "s l R. G werro 8realau .. h ns Gary A Coil Dav�tl N l��q on Carleton P Lightfoot Marsnar, A R rrr ry i JCh-ef ey Joint . Lo don High School Di -crict title 211 WEST FIFTH S',',EET. ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA 91762 -1698 714) 988.8511 SUPERINTFmneiT 0¢ SCHOOLS ASS04UTF SUPERINTENDENT BOARD MEMBERS INSTRUCTION Xathlaa E.1GnkY •saaTata� 0ean E. Smotl+as Be fn B. Harrison a C. Marlin _ AsStSTANY SUPERINTENDENT Rarna+4 J. W. W W IU PERSONNEL CMa J. W hak . C�afdt! . Wall OWWd E. Culp. tdovember 29, 1989 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA penning Division Sax 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ATTN: Brett Horner Qg• TT 14211. U.S. ! OM-1 This project is in the Etiwanda High School attendance area. ctiwanaa High School is seriously overcrowded. please see Ire :haffey Oistrict" Department of, Real Estate Report, enclosed. The C?-,affey District is in the Process of forming a Mello -Rocs oistrt_. to fund facilities to help mitigate school impaction. The District requests that the City require as a condition of approval of TT 14311 its annexation into that Mello -Roos District. he Chaffey District has a mistgatien agreement that U.S. Homes may execute, if they agree to this condition of acproval. -.T_1-,e30, Lincoln Property CamDanY - S This ^roject, too, is in the Etlta °Tda High School a Indence area. Th same comments and Chaffee ulsteict requests mad_ abaave perta n tc TT 14530 also. R , -T 14515 Sierra vista Town.1-o, -as Ltd. 4 This prcject, also. is in tY3 _tiw&. -,da High Sc4.. of a_terdan.e area. The sale comments and Chaf =Y District request f -,ade above perta.l* to TT 14585. also. IITTY.OF Rra�:,;iOOtiC,"i ^� q''INNING r 1.z,fl tt It DEC 1 19$3 urkTftAM • 097AMAO . VALLEY VIEW CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 8, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commissioli FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Associate Planner Low 0 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14630 - LINCOLN FER --, COMPAr( - The development, of 366 condominium Lnits on 20.15 acres of land in the Medium - digh Residential District (14 -24 duelling units per acre) in the Victoria Planned Community, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227 - 691 -01. v I. BACKGROUND: On July 11, 1990, the Planning Commission accer,.ed the request by Lincoln Properties to reconsider the 2 -2 -1 vote of denial for Vesting Tentative Tract 14630 on June 13, 1990. Therefore, a new public hearing has been advertised, the community has been noticed, and the reconsideration is now rapdy for Commission review and action. II. ANALYSIS: When the project originally came up for Commission review, several issues and concerns were expresseJ. The Commission noted that the entire architectural scheme needed upgrading (based on its proximity to Central Park), that carports should not be used, that a perimeter wall or fence might be appropriate, that the request for an increase in the number of one - bedroom units allowed was of concern, and that details of the acoustical barriers for the patios and decks should be reviewed. _ In addition to these design issues, there was cop�iiderable public testimony and concern with ?> project. The residents in the surrounding neighborhood w_re concerned that the site was being developed with rental units and not with a for -sale product, that the density was too high, that builders had not properly disclosed to buyers that the land was intended for multi - family, that the projt -t would detrimentally impact local schools, and �h trafft.,, noise, and crime would increase in the area. III. RECONSIDERATION REQUEST: The app. _nt is requesting that the Commission reconsider denial of ILhe project and has indicated a wiilingness to mrk with the Commission and local residents to address the various concerns. The applicant has already withdrawn the Conditional Use Permit which was submitted to allow ar PLANNING COMMISSION FF REPCRT EA & VTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY CO. August 8, 1940 Page 2 inevease in the number of one - bedroom units. This action dictates a revised site plan which should be sent back for review and approval by the Design Review Committee. The Committee could look at the other design issues at such time as well. IV. DENSITY ISSUE: Staff would also recommend that the Commission discuss the Issue of density tonight as well. Given the significant resident opposition to thst project density and unit type, the Commission may want to reconsider the overall density of the project. Perhaps a new site plan could be generated to achieve a more gradual transition in density in the area. Staff notes that the site was 6riginaily designated with two residential land u5as, With about half the site being Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and the other half being Medium -Nigh Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acrel. The project's density as it is currently designed is 17.7 units per acre which the Victoria Community Plan permits and which the Design Review Committee recommended approval of.. However, the full Commission may wish to reconsider the current site plan and recommend development of a different dwelling unit type (townhouse, duplex, etc.) for use on the northern and eastern portion of the site. This would be more consistent with the original 8 -14 dwelling units per acre designation and provide for a more gra'.ual transition in density from the existing and planned homes in the area. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission direct the applicant to develop revised plans which address the density transition issue and the various site plan and architectural design issues and then send the project back to the Technical and Design Review Committees. The applicant should also be directed to work with the surrounding community while deve;)ping the revised plans. Res pp'r y ted Brad City r BB:BNjjfs Attachments: ExhiW "1" - July 11, 1994 Staff Report Exhibit "2" - June 13, 1990 Staff Report 1 4, -Sy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO1VGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July '1, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF I r"JItl air. IRAV! ruw Av"Ll LARLIWLl9 raurrmis L'UPKNA[ - ma aeve7opment of condominium units an 20.15 acres of and in the Medium -Nigh Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) in the Victoria Planned Community, located on the nortNltast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227- 691 -01, 1. BACKGROUND: On July 5, 1990, staff received the attached letters requesting reconsideration of Tentative Tract 14630 and withdrawal of Conditional Use Permit 90 -05. On June 13r, 1990, the Planning Commission took action on both Vesting Tentative Tract 14630 and Conditional Use Permit 90 -05 for the Lincoln Property proposal. The recommendation for approval was automatically denied on a 2 -2 -1 vote. Following the Planning Commission's action of June 13, the applicant filed an appeal with the City Council. Said appeal was tentatively scheduled � be heard by the City Council on July 18, 1990. However, with the receipt of Lincoln Property's request for vecoc-?deration for Tract 14630 and their letter withdrawing Conditional Use Permit 90 -05, Lincoln Properties is now requesting tLit the Planning Commission reconsider their action and set the revised proposal for public hearing. Lincoln Properties has indicated in their letter that upon -acceptance of the reconsideration that they will withdraw their appe4i of Tentative Tract 14630. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff' recommends that the Planning Commission accept the request for reconsideration of Tentative Tract 14630 and set it for public hearing on the July 25, 1990 Planning Commission agenda. "Al ly _ WttP4. Brad,4,dpA er-„/ City fanner 88 :gs FXN /9/I - "I ri Attachments: Exhibit "A" - J,jly 3, 1990, Letter from Applicant Exhibit "8" - uuly 5, 1990, Letter from Applicant CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFFS REPORT DATE: June 13, 1990 TO: Chairman and Aembers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMHRT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14630 LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY The development of 356 condominium units on 20,15 acres of land in the Medium - High Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) in the Victoria Planned Community, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue APN: 227 - 691 -01. Y err►. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90 -05 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY - A request for a 4 percent increase in the allowable percentage of one - bedroqm units within a proposed 356 -unit condominium project located on the northwest corner of 4ase Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227- 261 -01. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map, site plan, grading plan, landscape plan, and elevations, and issuance of a Negative declaration. B. Proiect Density: 17.7 dwelling units per acre. C, Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family residential; Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant; Neighborhood Commercial East - Vacant, Lcw- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) West - Vat!ant; Cent.,al Park Site D. General Plar +•Designations: Project Site - Low-Medium-Residential North - Low - Medium Residential South Neighborhood Comercial East - Low - Medium Residential West - Park 11 11 PLANNING COMMISSION S. r REPORT VTT 14630 6 CUP 90 -05 - LINCOLN PROPERTIES COMPANY June 13, 1990 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The site, which slopes approximately 3- 4 percent from north to south, is vacant with remnants of a farmer vineyard. F. Parking Calculations: Total Units: 356 Unit Mix - 1 bedroom 140 2 bedrooms 176 3 bedrooms 40 Parking Required: 140 X 1.5 = 211 175 X 1.8 = 317 40 X 2.0 8O ati6 X 0.25 = 89 Total Parking Spaces Required 696 Parking Provided Enclosed Garage 190 Carport 204 Open 294 Total Parking Spaces Provided 6699 II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The project contains th -ae different unit types ranging_in size frow a 714 square foot one - bedroom unit to a 1,111 square foot three - bedroom unit. The units are arranged in four different building types. Parking is provided in enclosed garages, carports, and open stalls. On -site amenities include a recreation building, two tot tots, two pools, and two spas. Three open play areas and a tennis court are also provided. B. Conditional Use Permit: The applicant has fired, in conjunction with the vesting tentative map, Conditional Use Permit 90 -05 to permit them to exceed the maximum number of one bedroom units within the project. The Development Code limits the number of one - bedroom units to 35% of the total number of units unless the Commission approves a r-onditional Use Permit and finds that the development exhibits innovative design qualities and a balanced mix of unit sizes and types. Lincoln Properties proposes 140 orte- bedroom units of the total 356 units 139 %). This exceeds the maximum number of one- bedroom units by 15 units. The Design Revirw Committee discussed this issue on April 5, 1990 and indicated that they were not opposed to the proposed winit max sirce there were 14 �-,.3'7 PLANNING COMMISSION S F REPORT YTT 14630 & CUP 90 -05 - LINCOLN PROPERTIES COMPANY June 13, 1990 Page 3 also two and three bedroom units and since the applicant's , marketing research supported the mix. See Exhibit "G" for the applicant',; statement if unit mix justification. A Resolution has been drafted and is attached recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit 90 -05. C. Design Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, Weinberger, Coleman ) recommended approvai ,f the project on May 17, 1990, after initial reviews an April 15 and May 3 1990. The v p �Y Committee recommended 'at the following rev- ons be made: 1. A minimum 5- foot -wide parkway should be provided between the Milliken Avenue curb and sidewalk adjacent to the right turn deceleration lane. 2,. Concrete interlock V%o _pavers should be usei throughout, including the aria: within the parking courts. They shall also be usEO in all areas where sidewalks cross drive aisles. T 3, The overlay presented at the Committee meeting of May 7, 1990, depicting the pedestrian and monument signs on N( northeast corner of Milliken and Base Line Road should be Y_avidtd on the final plans. link 4: "�xcosed agg,egate should be, used on the 4 -foot pedestrian t'r'ail. S. Louvers should be added within the inset accent painted areas in the garages and Oe second -story 'insets on the Building 500 elevation, F. Additional detailing should be explored for use around the second -story window insets. STAFF' COMM Items 1 -6 have !,yen made conditions of the Design Review approval. 7. New drawings depicting gable ends and a ful; tide roof on the eight -space carport should be provided for review. Stucco ends were also discussed for use below Che roof line. STAFF C9MM: The Committee (McNiel, Toistoy, Coleman) reviewed revised carport elevatSon4 , May 17, 2990. The Committee recommended th., M11,juting , revisions be made tto the cerpor•.:s0 (a) The ends should be walled off to match the ands of the garages. PLANNING CLMMISSION S F REPORT VTT 14630& CUP 90 -05 - LINCOLN PROPERTIES COMPANY June 13,, 1990 Page 4 �--6 i (b) Al carports facing Milliken Avenue sho;ald be made garages. (c) The six- and eight- space carports should have full tine roofs with :,mall gables si-41 ar t- those on the garage roofs. The above three recommendations have be:. made Condition 7 of approval. The new carports are shown are Exhibit "F -50. D. Neiahborhood__Me!�tings: The most recent neighborhood meeting t,ith City staff present was held. on May 25, 1990. Staff briefly esented the scope of the project to surroundi,g Victor% :ommunity residents and listened to the concerns of those in attendance. At that meeting, the residents expressed their concern with the project's access to Milliken Avenue, the three story buildings, and the carports. The residents stated their preferzaice for ownership units over apartments, and discussed concerns with traffic, crime, and prrperty values. A second meeti.ig with the developer in attendance is scheduled for Saturday, June 9, 1990 at Victoria Groies Park. The results of that msu ing will be presented in staff's oral report or June 13, 1990. j In addition to the above mentioned meetings, the developer held three meetings with_ the ACTIVE fbmeown_r's group in Victoria on August 26, 1989, September 13, and on September 28, 1989. These meetings were atterAued by the ACT?VE representatives as well as other concerned residents prior to L tho project's submittal to the City. E.. Technical Review Committee: The Committee has reviewed the a. ,ject and determined that with the recommender✓ special conditions and attached standard conditions of approval the prv3ect is consistent with all applicable standards and ownanres. F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has - been completed by the applicant. Part Hof the Environmental Checklist, completed by staff, found that althiugh the project may have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures idr,itifiec in the Initial Study have been A added to the project approval. �--6 i PLANNING COMMISSION S F REPORT VTT 14630 & CUP 90 -05 - LINCOLN PROPERTIES COMPANY June 13, 1990 Page 5 1. Noise: The project is subject to significant nois4: impacts along Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue. A preliminary acoustical study has been prepared which identifies mitigation measures (sound barriers) ne-ded to bring the site Tito conformance with City noise standards. The project is designed without a perimeter wall along Base Line Road nr Milliken Avenue. Therefore, patios and balconies will vequire their own sound wall. Patio sound walls mast be 6 foot 5 inches (6 foot on Base Line Road) and balcony sound walls must be 6 foot (5 foot 5 inches on Base Line Road). The elevations as reviewed by Design Review'CowAttee did riot address this element; hence, a condition has been added to go back to the Design Review Committee prior to issuance or building permits. It final acoustical report will be submitted (Condition Rio. 9) to identify precise measures which must be incorporated into the final project design. 2, Schools: On June 7, 1989, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 395 whic'n establishes a policy for a condition to be placed on all pending residential projects to ensure adequate school capacity. This condition has been added as Planning Division Condition No. 1 of the Vesting Tentative Tract Resolution of Approval. 3. Pedestrian Safety: The site is located across Milliken Avenue from the future City Central Park which will tend to draw pedestrians across that heavily traveled road at miu- block. Therefore, as a mitigation measure, the applicant must, as a condition of approval (See Engineering Division Condition No. 1) reconstruct the i Milliken Avenue median landscaping to discourage mid- block pedestrian crossing. III. FACTS FOR FINDI;IES: This project is consistent with the Victoria Community Pan and the General Plan, and will not be detrimental j to adjacent properties or? cause significant adverse impacts. The p ^oposed use, building design, and subdivision, together with all recommendc' conditions of approval, is in compliance with applicable regulations of the Development Code and the Victoria Community Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item his been advertised as a public hearing in The hind. Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site and within an expanded notification area. 0 '+6 PLANNING COMMISSION ' E REPORT VTT 14630 & CUP 90 -05 LINCOLN PRCPERTIES COMPANY June 13, 1990 _ Page 6 V. RECOMMENDAT1ON: In that during a recent neighborhood meeting one May 25th 'and a follow -up meeting with the developer on June 9th, concerns for the project were raised by surrounding residents, s staff would recommend that this matter be continued to June 27th to allow staff the opportunity to address those concerns. However, should the Planning Commission determine that those issues raised by the residents have been addressed in the project as it is presently submitted; staff would recommend that the Planning Commission approve Vesting Tentative Tract 14630, subject to the conditions of approval, through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative.Declaration. Res p ful su to rad Bu City Plan r 3:BH /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Tentative Subdivision Flap Exhibit °D" - Conceptual Grading Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscaping Exhibit "F" Building E'evations - Exhibit "G" - Letter Requesting Conditional Use Permit Approval Resolution of Approval VTT 14630 with Conditions Resolution of Approval VTT 14630 OR with Conditions Resolution of Approval CUP 90 -05 RESOLUTION NO, Ask 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VE.:;ING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14630 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 328 CONDOMINIUM UNITS, FOR RENTAL PURr_1SES, ON 20.15 ACRES of LAND IN THE MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14 -24 DWELLING ]UNITS PER ACRE), IN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 227 - 691 -01 A. Recitals. M Lincoln Property Company' has filed an application for th;a approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 14630 as described in the title Uf this Resolutiona. Herei, )..f`cer in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (1 0 on the 14th day of November 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All regal prerequisites pri.)r to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 14, 1990, including written and ore. staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road with a street frontage of 1940 feet on Base Line Road and a lot depth. of *1,266 feet and is presently uni�dproved; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is single family homes, the property to the south, east, and west of the site is vacant. i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. VTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 " le 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commissiq�n during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs X and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and - concludes as follows: (a) That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,: and specific plans; and I (b) The design .or improvements of the tentative tract is - consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is no. likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health roblems• and P , � (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdiv'ision., 4. This Commission Hereby finds and certifies.that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends, that the City Council approve the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated lerein by this reference. Planning Division" 1) Prior to the recordation of the final map or - the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent ;to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello- Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to _provide in conjunction with the applicable School District; for the construction and maintelance of necessary school facilities.. However, if any School District has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the l rj1 y PLANNIiiG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, VTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 3 annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further., if the affected School .District has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities` District within twelve months of the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 2) The project shall be constructed consistent with the recommendations of the Preliminary Noise Study. A Final Noise Study shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits in a standard format as determined by the City Planner. Said report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of mitigation measures included in the- building plans. Envineering Division 1) The median island landscaping within Milliken Avenue along the project frontage shall be reconstructed in conformance with the City Master Plan, which Will offer more resistance to pedestrian crossing thin the current landscaping. 2) Landscaping wi+;,hin the "Limitod Use Areas" for all project deiveways shall be approved by the City Engineer. 3) Additional street ,•ight -of -way shall be dedicated to provide 7 feet of right -of -way from the Curb face to the street right -of -way line (parkway) alord the right turn lane for the driveway on Milliken Avenue. A landscaping area shall be provided between the curb and sidewalk adjacent to the right turn lane (minimum 4.5 feet from the curb face to the sidewalk). The additional area needed for the sidewalk shall be in a sidewalk easement. Also, a 5 -foot wide streel tree easement shall do provided adjacent to the sidewalk. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLt1TION NO. VTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 4 4) The existing overhead utilities (electrical, except for the 66KV electrical) on the project side Sf Base Line Road shall be undergrounded from the fi.,st pole on the west side of Milliken Avenue to the terminus pole on the east side of Milliken Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occ+irs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City's adopted cost f %.r undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 5) All public imprrvements including,- but not limited -to, sidewalks, street light::, landscaping, and the access curb to the 66KV electrical poles shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer, and City Planner. Additional landscape ?asements may be required along Base Line Road to appropriately landscape this` street frontage due to the planting limitations under and around the relocated utility poles. A11 public improvement plans, including landscaping, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and City Planner prior to recordation of the final map. 6) Landscaping along Milliken Avenue shall conform to the City's Milliken Avenue Master Plan. 7) The sidewalk shall meet driveways tzt the zero face of the curb return. An additional easement is required for sidewalk that extends beyond the property line. Also, the driveway medians shall not encroach within the public street right -of -way. 8) The length of curb adjacent sidewalk for the bus bay shall be minimized as determined during plan check. 9) Landscape the Base Line Road median island (full width) from Milliken Avenue to Rochester Avenue. Landscaping along Base Line Road shall conform to the Base Line Road Master Plan. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of one -half of the width of the landscaping fronting his project from future development of adjacent and across the street properties. A FII s i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. VTT 14630 LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 5 10) A bus bay shall be constructed on the east id s e ., of Milliken Avenue just north of B ;e Line Road, 6. The Secretary to this Co::nission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1990, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO >CUCAMONGA BY: _ Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foreS* ing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Cit. of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of November 1990, by the following vote -to -wit AYES: COMMISSIONERSz NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS.- C, _ 0 L.. L v is 6 \— �'ypYV G�rCCN Y °ep p yEll- U V O V ii Y N y^ O $ua�ao��t�uwe C V `ayPi �;pY KO V��q'CN CQ�yy t�Y.L 0R�u7 w�wLLn y� .b +N+4wi CC% L Y.N N V Q� N MA 0 4 S -5s -A L �.��.1l pLY ti L yY VCC * yy Y L N Y" 9% 4 Y 0 �.6W 4Y�C >YCyA �YJi. O�Ys YYy O.�n OM O V 0 o v °g O K 4"3 i�Z rBGO YTaiss o � ° pNLYO p •N GYf. 9�$ qw.l ` iV N L 60 yY Y. jj [is ` Y P a` V q a,'. rY y • V ji 1 Eat ~ � p L � ` 9 Y E �'Y Y yi C Y , C~rL6 9.0 yN C. W VYp v Fuk ^/Tyd GW`N �GpN NY9N L.LV0 OOI O +ra 4NC► OICY i� Ntl�y a °_Y E--'4 4d 6 Y `-p V.CV yQ_ P1w Sr rLV 0O Y V � ' � ■p O. O N � �� V N N �. � w■ � O � O'r a 4 ~vyO y02 GVL. r� .:S M C C A 4 N N_ ° p V O '4MA �� G ,LN YCC' i - aCm' N Y V y COp�w'.V.yy. yyMT �pp Myy.V'19� P EPOCH KYi aN_ TSi �C O.AYO Fi GLR u G.I Y9op Y C. pip .(iA�{T ]gV�Y ^�L a .a • rJ V ! •�Y _ ! galr vi y,�t w vo p$n ! �' VC+£ NN O Mme, Y BaaGON �Q V N a0 {j S M`. ZtlI ♦ i tC O iO �yy MrM IL �+g":.° p w w ai w 5 C s Tl O° 5— HIS p.2 M =N A y y�N L a LN NYN. .Oar Y Y SA Yom' °uw ° """333YS °$off aba, ,Y�o �.r+ a- Zge A's " Y. � ofN CO p q p OI G �• +� 9 Y° M NY Y°■^.L i((..°�. oa, ^. ' CsY`3 CL O ~M .a c � L �7Y .•°f • • oo w �v , °u.L•t• .4 d . ^.NL.!C6 e'u�AOts.QL L'eaYYU. � tH. yy�� y 'i N.Q ^ r.Q Spot W G o-my :;.a Y Y -'rx L 7 C .N. �•O o A itN g' �o C Y C g�S L � a aT r Mq YC 'gaN `a V qCC.0 COOS SC EC Gi L.Ct OYLwN Xs N�i �Oiw ESN S�SN�VSN .. M�wYys 4V•^Oi Y • `'1� wC •wti.° LOY. ^P ��•°. ai y°-LG «44uw 4t C� 4 HC_a NI wI '•r• Y.1� N 4w N ' Y ° Ols r G t • �Y1 `{p.'� . SfL yaeO9 `S~'° l� H ..w Oai p'N.�V C't Q -9 'o. y� ��•• gM +S y G !� V4a� ^0 pC 01 ^u ■' V� y62Y ►YyY C as pYY =ya�p• Q+ nNA( ■O{NC Y 'S as LCYq CN Y�yYyywwS LC`�y >>��pi aYy _ yS,B' «C �= T °•'•VC2 iY«Gy `Yw a ^.y�L ON a C01C;� OILML 1YC�r CG JJ V ' «GNNy1i w{Y.•J.Y� �. °'L�GL VS kS �Y {� LpO .4 9g Y IL Y 60 b'C �2�' NM`� 3'N O M CO µNCOC�• Cs+ l S O FA Y Li•�° SNVY�+ YLi C M YM+ lti .a +E C �C6w. i NO. u yS� TC Y v Y y Y �`•YM 6 ytj Gr'H i ' a 'i_O VA I C G C . V q c N ...• t O b y Gd 27 V1tt= N•' a C C .o I �VJ w ° �aY a at % o ° C y ' F �0 N eerr N p «^ vZa ET b L °s * NL w�N Y AJ h L N HNA \I V!• ^r w Oy! •y90+9 ° «pCYN YYTL! may^ lit ' V 4QY� ;wH•` =� ^�L •+�� jai o q „'� to 871.3« N.L. $ .-. a a _G Cl p ■■ N�y@> b C D g N S w� 'RN L C N L� � ..O pS N^ yW A •p avy utr c IL y•�� Cp Y01 «L 4"t' �^ `q q�• •"� �p yak tluq�C `'�M WA Ey ' s`�+ « CYO Yp ` ``• «y �q yyyv)))Y��a�1`q• C� `Y4.i.0 Q�S« CVtO CV PyL r.:Y -1 LV7. v qr yI S dN`li `p3 o.�a:. �`•�� Nu Y«"';"'” t ^F� VoNN'+` '�COrs sai �..�ri S �^��ttL�O yy■■AY QS ��CCY��`Y Yp C OeeN «�`�3a. LOJS •y �p C «VV =ii�N` C lCCC4t O D C,C Uy C gLS7 ��.pC.Y LY GNYY V`1.. ?L iyY YNOIY +yCO ■n. f°.•L�wY.��HI -c Na hi V J C A �•••• ••.qNC.. 6 �,• 1 N 1 stub C Q L 5- Q'' 9q � CO OC � � 4C �O L e Y ..r. C ■ � 06V vy G''zY 8$ ^yy qr aOVq ssOV ^ +�a =y0 ~On° C = „�CC L CYY�b RZ $ 1AY +M jy L e .- `u �T J P y O~ p ° N V O. •+ O Y w N wV�1 ^ y M 9N ri. 7 m°{� O y•• ^ � a y N �� t� .°. Q u {I NN~ y � Ma wYY G OL CN C � N N Y C N y C L V w OI v tL4A E N Y V O N N w O Cp N �v�.0 qpp {� S °C`�L{�1u ��'1 wNmY C� GVO ■ ■p > ^"MM SI.VN�G riV��• p�t `pia G l V 6! c IIY t N C q $ m^ N °P b C w.v. G V g_' N, �GY� WQ $�•�L GN '� NE . 9� "C'L. --a N Up ��N. 4' N.i V N) � Z`� /Y i 1Npy MLN g% c >�Y.SS�CN6 ° '�. V,�L .OVA DLO Nrwei�L O.. C.�w r� V�"YC YoNx °{{{ ^OOOMI Q''� $LQw$ -ra `'�-` �ti ^�ri?V3 .L,vL'` ■$ty� QQN :wr '_ Y LT7 "��O }L �Yr Yi.^ ° w `��x�i L N HE ^++ v O {a�� y Yy ^ 9 {V�♦ V wC G t. N�NAN GN.. �A Z.NO FNu �Nt°i /�.�C1 >DIA MGO i7.5 KY {1 O�pN 1.1 • N .° 1� O 01 � tia� as °c eYi�y o� r .- Dyti°rdc NNY G C Z.5 C 0. G U- 3= 3 M N N N O �rwy, cc YY' ~pp L Y �v`V ys a- t 7Yy 3 VZ pwi N Ow aC 4: N p— c r''j. °O a p.. •'au y � G �QY wC p.ii ^:y ZwM Y C.§ Cy oOL a l Y O A' QV C V 31g r O �~ y Pp L. a Y V A 1i.� uuOe KCL •• w `p i 9u� Yre�N pw a$`O �w C >rei� Lx��SY . e g h iiiTTTTTT ��1ltttt ••ss � $ ", �` yY �° L °s vs w V a V N.5 C « C- a w� , �rd °Ipi .b . aL YroY c cFi 021 'S � i N W ti I n }.. EER �a�y 46 q;y ESL^ Y6 +�c� Y4 ■u- Y`Y +yy� i4,) C VVV Y iMy1 �! O � S M�� y �4V�� 1.•o r?u g QY vY`�Y 'IT! Y—w OC Uwe y�0 paI�^. ryM i M •• •�.�� SYY ^ Q` 4WC .r7.0— t 9 n.• C •OY iVr�M T+YY lP� gY i 'f3v :i $$ C Ot C yy !� ■ppp Y p^ O 4 u^ �. i Y 9 V,6 Vs`� C Y nL H� y =• Y•« C m C Y3 : S �N4 NL� 6•rJ�O V ..! 1� r. eV •e Nyp �' Y, il•YM vJ AyV Y Y w � A .� • d A 4 N yy �� GN V V N -,z.5 W y L Y O; Y N �Q{ V • O Y O 5� M A M YY J C�4N xOLN g. s�ycy( s`u-T GaH,y g§ w YS 1 am ai.Oy -K u`o �� °ws �+ o '�Mpip `'vi �'u�:' Y die v` ^p OYi 4^ l e vyy rr e• {{o��y�C Yo> N.r Y II.HeA N.°a $ I- it, C.a 3�'�ZA E.5 s�:o y pp 7e�� i.°� � i7i i3 M � . v a 5 i 4S b O Y s Y• .` b. ' C C r c r, 65 ■ .1 L L. •� Y is °g + dog t : g -3xT YB --' ••el: M eepy� C+a¢Nc �v^Yicca V C ir�a ��yr ty YCR �� no "c C� YY —mss 10►yN PCC oa� tir. py) Y4� 'LJ•QN.VC LY �.C.L CpC ` d — Vd�Q•Y w O- Cy��pY VyO pYV ^rr.r O• N 5tN�YAY �• O�NV 3, r L O^ Y • i6 $ 7 a • � u ,s V Q g � � Y .. L=S V ,N� aOC s —A .0 • C P iU t`t E o (, �N .h �. I C VCC Y • Yy Y�a'g VVg V �O�C w Or O,,, � C w C��•rOr ��a. �T NO 0G6�� 52 NG XN�i 30 � � S .Y.�w— ^ O y � VVV •.p �. O,O. G Y S N ON• �d� ~O t` Off^ x ��u �Y~ ..GCY ti40iY' aVpa Y CUYtlL w�CC .J'4. �... ^ 4 YGV ON �lS a� �" KGS • L .04 OVN� u, yi �YrV Y.O C WAA 1 .�i .�. .�,� • 4 s J a 5 s ; 1 � 4`O�,p rrw � Y •� M°r 1... YYYMMi`.��.Y Sig �__: ;,�: �. �4 If i `q3 - B. �. •� �' ��p'j(g�� N� ioR O cOr 5 �i Y G ✓G °iS^ CQ 6M+y.... .•.� �$w�� NN1. �ar�W ar �q�yj Y Z ` Y VO. N N yM'.yP YN^ yV .0 r1 C■ V 9rr1 yr C yr w r6 CO �� :0�10�C Y� S ^.� Y fN. ✓ � M S 4L � y w` Y�� y��. s4F• p At •S` Mal. s`oui`o�q � a ��a•ra _u$ �� ._�_y€' 6w4it sN Y T i .00 °•°. 1.� �H a°i0 iN 00�, N a.0 G ala r ; � L, 4 w C �I A V W �{ ca VC C YCY O O�.rn 01 9 CO'C !Yw#i OS.ri en: L k �a N~ 1p a> �" as �° Yg g" € - -fix =� � ar•, wr� �° x� gL S .v°o `S p aNn2ai •� Cw Yu�Y�a� °�O L'Y`.x". �5 ec 8u S�C gr_$�M� SGO� w:ss ANaa« s: r. a � :v MtnY Yc V, �"' �. � ap +L ,� SO� Afii i •f + «�°.� x Ly~ 6fr �F aY •"w.� w� y3�' L S. w•`!lp6l -52 N^S +_ =- y41� �^ ^°, ~ +� S� w•� � MV V`asl. M4W ,��s�6. C $§ e Yppp Y Ny Cali > qg.;. Y'7•!i ■Qy. °tJ« Yp a rat lqTL ty$1 ^Gq�V y `y�•EW SY'°a Npry¢ 0 "= `- »Y O1 ^pQY t Y , V/V•3�i^. .°i'i}Cwco...ar.L" Wr3 i`. lw �q §ix <« :iii 0 " M, ..N• 1 � Soo $� ��C � Y •`S YY� .°'. " Ea $ y'+'.J' Qn '�c$ o> "'2 a °C 'S`•➢t o � � o o s $g $' eu;v 'uC Ig Wj j fie' Ne � aw cnijA ti� l VCpaYL'> 75� , CC u Y O— q5«N h'$ IT U G� tS �O C ■� �N�$S p w_' �.j• gC4 SY.Y v_y+N �a= 6.1.. aO1pv S� gn qO. s rye iC. 6E S U{ I L r F V O ^ .O1 C Y r. C• yUy r M �. C yy L O C r NVr� SG •OSy OG N1 Ilq` y01 Zhu 4U4 LLUC q U d✓ 4 ``JjC .w SNM E°' M^ CYYyU AC a� LN C 0 q y hu aL wSO y�C U� UC eUOYIrCey1 �C ES 3ioa�:. in0 Lv$ tH yS WMNVL.Lr 7 Vv SV C �O FNYW 6�6w 4 CdI pl 14l 4 U w L Z ` N U V Y Y C Ea U .ti SA Y r�. 1 v q 7 N V Y • ^ Y 'Ns au M ey» cs. v 'L e� MO a rf, yu ^$ .5 E.:.g �C» Yy Y � N U � �qc ` •yy.Cgf Jyy U e % Yju. 6 S L L4 W D E V 4 q 01 E b N d �O U Hr'0U 4✓ a r1 mg eA�ML g �a[ RE I �y� O s^ L U Y�v� ap al If � N N v N 6.!- Y;Y y 6tc`i r ��^ Y N •O o Y 4 � W t C 11 O Y 1 M C 3 L G SIN ~ Ha W 4 N y wJVy L M p L G L D a O �Rd 111111444 J Y O G w G� ua eAy,,, +u az;l it 62'� IMP Le Z. 'S N1►• b V a4} WW Q�w Q 1. Y R G� b sA 12 11iusIBM Y N I p wo.�IY� � J}rYUWW! All M N y Y C i r L. 4V b C O r ti N L SCE{ V a0 6L�ar CC y�y C9D C :YO� aaap `V 1DI t A O C 11 O Y 1 M C 3 L G SIN ~ Ha W 4 N y M p L !Tb a 111111444 Y R �a •w� w G� ua eAy,,, +u sEa it 62'� IMP Le Z. 'S N1►• b V a4} WW ib�w Q 1. 1� V P 12 11iusIBM Y N I a. e wo.�IY� � J}rYUWW! All Y zoo. L. 4V CC p Y SCE{ Np}L�w a0 6L�ar g e _� v,,ZGS`G1 aaap `V kv LOyp d e 1 I I Y V R p owD I` G ~ Ha W 4 N y M p L a s yy �oi3^ ®®N A i0 V i A � � s 4 a sEa it 62'� IMP Le Z. 'S N1►• �Ny ebii a L L �b Y.Y.i pR V P 12 11iusIBM Y N I a. e yam, All Y V R p owD I` G ~ z N M p L s NMN �oi3^ ®®N A i0 V i A � � NNC ue� 4 a sEa it 62'� IMP Le Z. 'S N1►• ad[ G =a � lot syy a Y.Y.i pR V P 12 11iusIBM Y N I a. e yam, All y.. L2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DESIGN I -EVIEW FOR VESTIN1 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14.30, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 328 CeNDOMINIUM UNITS, FOk RENTAL PyRPOSES, ON 20.15 ACRES OF LAND IN THE Ni DIUM -nIXGN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 0144 OWELLIN UNITS PER ACRE), IN THE V :TORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINt RGAD ANP MILLIKE'l AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227- 691 -01. A. Recitals. (i) incoin Property Company has filed an application for the Design Review of Vesting Tract No. 14630 as described in thv title of this Resolution. Hereinafter{ the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application," (ii) Or, November 14, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga he`:i a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites pr'or to the adoption of this Resol -lion have occurred. B. .1esolution. NOW, THE'.EFu ^E, it is hereby found, determine,, dnd resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds thac all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Sased upon substantial evidence p,•esented to this Commicsion during the above- ,eferenced reeting on November 14, 1990, including written and oral stcff reports, this Commission hereby specifj,,.ally finds as follovts: (a) Thai: the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and ,b) That l:he proposed design is in accord wit:i a objectives of the Development Code and the Purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That-the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Cude; and (d) i'hat the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will nor be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurtjus to properties o; improvements in the vicinity.. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. OR FOR VTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERLY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 3. Rased upon Lhe findsngs and conclusions set forth in paragra''S 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby recommendu that the City counoil approve the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by 0°s reference. Piannin3 division 1) Extensive laniscaping, berming, ,end /or low walls shall be provided along Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road to screen the parking areas and garages as determined by the City Planner, prior to the isp,!ance of building permits.. 2) Seating areas stiall be provided along the main pedestrian spine to the satisfaction of the City Planner, prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) Exposed aggregate /retardant finish shall be provided for the pedestrian spine. The walk shall be a; minimum of 5 feet in width. 4) A second tot lot shall be provided to serve the southern portion of the site. 5) Building 20 (rs the east entry) &hall be skewed to tho s3lthwest to provide more open space /lardscapir., across from the entry. 6) All plans shall indicate a minimum 5 -foot landscaped ,arkwry adjacent to the right tern pocket on Milliken Avenue. 7) The Victoria entry monumant design shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee, prior to the issuance of building Permits, S) The final design of the pedestrian conAaction to the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road shall be reviewed and approved by .the 0esign Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. 9) The spacing of the slumpstone pilasters used with the wrought iron fencing shall be consistent w th the spacing used else4ere in Victoria. f f EA 2 D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR FOR VTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 3 10) A material sample board indicating all colors and sampies of materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. 11) More articulation shall be provided within tFe belly band across the buildings. The same detail shall be used for the window sills. Said detail shall be reviewed and appre4ed by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. 12) Stucco wilapped trim shall be provided arJund the patio sliding glass doors. 13) Le.xan shall be used as necessary in accordance with the acoustical report to achieve sou,id attenuation along Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road. 14) Additional wood trellises shall be provided over balconies and /or entries. 15) A revised 'perspective of the gable eleMint adjacent to the entry of the 400 plan shall be provided for Design Review Committee review and approval prior to the,issuance of building permits. 16) Trash enclosures and mailbox sl;ade stt,uctures shall be designed to be architecturally consistent with the buildings, as determined by the City Planner. Trash enclosures shall inilude an overhead trellis strocZure to limit trash from blowing out and to screen- dumps�ers - from second -story units. 17) The final landscape plan st.P11 he designed in accordace with 'and shall comply with the City's adopted Xeriscape Ordinance 18) The elevations (i.e., balcony and patio walls) shall be revised consistent with the :poise mitigation recommendations of the preliminary acoustical studies subject to review and approval by the Design Review Committee. prior to the issuance of building permits. - r i i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR FOR VTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPA:MY November 14, 1990 Page 4 19) A low screen waft shall be provided along the opery perking Stalls dt the southeast corner of the site, on either side of the Victoria Planned Commut:lty , sIgnage. The finer plans shall be reviewed and approved with the final ?, landscape plan. 4. The Secretary to this Commission; shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' BY: Larry T. McNiel,Chairman. ATTE", . Brad aullersecretary ?, Brad Buller, Secretary of 'the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho C1icamonga, do heraby. rertify that the l regoing Resolution was duly said regularly introduced, passed, and' adapted 'by the, Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held r on the 14th day of Rovember 1990, by the ful.3owing vote--to-wit: AYES: CGM,MISSIONERS l NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: CUMMISSIONERSs _ fl k � ee ♦• 4 9 _*z ♦yy, Owp ^a Z y buy n^� -u «a �. �'� L S G M g 0= Y L 0.0. M Y + i� ' Y ♦■ 0 7 y '+k. O Or 4�1♦ Y;. Y'.�M MY �. `qN * al 6V ... C Y 'O: L+> � ^E «CCA ess 4nY aV �M N.� �,'�l e'iidsV.'JO. I]"U sves. e s 0w_r CYE— w(V. 2> CVY Qj9 Y� ^w V. 56...4. lj:i _,N� U O � G N ^V 00."j C�by O- - a �Oyw P�j Y C��PNG GV"'Q 1�W i,d4 •wp qGi �`q �YN � ^N6 1 C h� 5 y^ N N Z Y t3!! W C y wp yL y46 LLN� CG.✓U a+ «x+,. �t4 aC0 p1$ + ■`�y�{' QO p}' 23 ✓.� ssN^i'�.N GY �O «d G ?71 �s =K ♦` I r+ U y U Cy C MC W O V yy.. w O S C 4 4 tom. y Y °M« VU Y 3 OLfHNW I L T 0.M Y� ♦G4 a.--z 6Pw w.L4 'j�G� aNiN!. Y N +C GC ^? °A uj�? bGC d C« '~S L4^ �•°• «3'4V d.G � Y YCY �pe ACdu N'.OY C � D• a� NYC Lrp�N YY� QCQ�80.Y. 4 p N« GYp 6A NG N >yCyy �Opn Ow. .033. GI W tL�°r +96 F p06Y�N .+L�� ^p 4Wfl y HOC ♦° t O g L V 0 N^ C♦A J. N N^ S ° L ° P w W 9 C Y C1+r4YCi GY/a VYe {. 2 4^ .,. + 9. 2 a♦ � G N r.. G �+ L N 4 Y ti O W� � 4M. Y N Y 03�eo>LLV +oWO .M v L`N Y'LYr 7Y ^LG GY�JJ 1�°LL N+Vp >> L Z 0. W ^A 6PINLa7." O (�oGO /) R'.Y.♦ <N.��u$ w000_) �-r. 0.L 0.V u �O O !'J 1'1 �► '° 0 �va.e °NOo Cc 4 Y � V > ^.r3 wy+�6or W N� ! �w. MY ■y l♦C �pp pY y, YY4 7p O'.'f F ♦ u � W on.YU *._.G i� Q 9''M�pt va �a J .� � Ca �. ip f. ♦..YK��L C Q •2HN� Yr.,ii�i Y .tM� O O V= V L'�qy Vy � aG • � +; sSr yeYa�jj °y4 w �$ $W �'a- R ° ac w tZ '►i � F µ�` pp aa L V t►N .P Y 'M YY O rCq � •3 �t � w � Nas w �w�3 N t W r ^ yr J N wf ♦ \l Q w 0 �j � ✓�C C�9a EC�TO� u pw 2. cs3B 2 x O•+MNY CY -o s�a� u�oeo��C °s c0^s ^� oil- c ^O.rLVI .5- °. L u Y C "w O p� .2 . N Y —C pw ��nw ULC�° .VCD COG' Y d* C ay�Z�L.s sv. Da yg q Y L C Y O1 w0 ` � .• � Y Y u .i ° ` Y y■y■ Ytq■ yj1 Y 09y f� 4.Y�.+0.� L wSL C06N p S. °Vb Qau d� �iSNN L�yNiJV \1 N -� O Y p c • y YOppp .CN "y ylN u arse vnt Y C p N L O 9 N "; 6 A 6hu OfN W Y ` tiL 7 po p' 8aC9• S5 ppy yye pYp��} C • YC NC E 9= L 0 60 w wit . y. Cf^ _ ,, pp a NM YO y cw.w E w O > C YY NZ B.-Sa Y E yC Y�gg$Cr °N C 4CC`O.y.Y ^ss �i VL�PA GCe .CV .=n N Y2 Y W+C.�D O C C ►nM AM I C N�CCL CeVe y OP "_��` YMllN ��pL�Fiii4 ■N■ 6�l — sL�yy �a. c� Off■ �` yCy aL 34- O C H y L -to Zu cCL ars vOia ��jO. r =e0N ;S!{� V6¢ G YY V Q� VlY�N �C`` V C� W JWX O� N w M YaYq & cv IS'G�i�e Y�,�C" ^wry �� Lbw " "•��• y O�� M e CM MwY ^�Y 8 q t� d� CA P yG CC�6 7 L' y'ooY Vy pV �; v. c. ^ ).e G LS yi w Y O `'{� �1q 4040 uC -P f ^N l)OOLC � V -sx Ol L $ cA O 05p q;p o M • y L V Y 'QO N S Y�•� YS � L• Y � N p Y Jri ar 3 Y I�cM6®Y a \: J J 4 Y mac. S.St 4 v Y ° as N , y aQY�.� C Y p•c �ONC 4LL� �M QM 01C •y. A T V tYiC y LiOO V 9 Y aG€'o Y C O Y p c • y YOppp .CN "y ylN u arse vnt Y C p N L O 9 N "; 6 A 6hu OfN W Y ` tiL 7 po p' 8aC9• S5 ppy yye pYp��} C • YC NC E 9= L 0 60 w wit . y. Cf^ _ ,, pp a NM YO y cw.w E w O > C YY NZ B.-Sa Y E yC Y�gg$Cr °N C 4CC`O.y.Y ^ss �i VL�PA GCe .CV .=n N Y2 Y W+C.�D O C C ►nM AM I C N�CCL CeVe y OP "_��` YMllN ��pL�Fiii4 ■N■ 6�l — sL�yy �a. c� Off■ �` yCy aL 34- O C H y L -to Zu cCL ars vOia ��jO. r =e0N ;S!{� V6¢ G YY V Q� VlY�N �C`` V C� W JWX O� N w M YaYq & cv IS'G�i�e Y�,�C" ^wry �� Lbw " "•��• y O�� M e CM MwY ^�Y 8 q t� d� CA P yG CC�6 7 L' y'ooY Vy pV �; v. c. ^ ).e G LS yi w Y O `'{� �1q 4040 uC -P f ^N l)OOLC � V -sx Ol L $ cA O 05p q;p o M • y L V Y 'QO N S Y�•� YS � L• Y � N p Y Jri ar 3 Y I�cM6®Y a \: J J III yVy YCtl L01 byGy L ��VGa CA C!L �Lf. Vb 0-0 C L q tly p 6 ' A, [. G C N ptY- 1 u O4'a L C� EJY6.NO �.2s s .22 3:6 ?^ p Yyw NEE hpCC M � LN NL+f� O� Ca4 �L A =N L b!3:6 IL z Cw.As q A~ya. w �. wii «tY,l • oo yoFSOy. O{1 -�uC az LY C iO QCyy COQ• }V}�e G '.2 1' qYLO G- yY - sit„ Y Or Ms -CN fib .'` o O y Y Y M N y J V= 4GtY) •. L m C N O M .. lb tl b. L Y G T ��.4 MpCcG) ` V N Y VU _ - G y V Y � . Y =•• _OC YY p�p 8 �- 8� „ - •'^ €Va �.tlw Iyys y 0 N 4OI «S� y4 -Y - M 'b^4 r° �dMY NC N >MYO j y 9.w G> V tl Y M G a 4 $ Y O N O.- Y LL y s O qCy o66 Yr uo ° +.aa •N," 6 C N L Y V C P� = 4 O C YyyI Y Y VY V YOM o$: 'y _L �^ C'YG M N 6� •)y t�`�eLii NNy■ V=uE Ya GgVL CY it) qGq O y�4� N CYww.pL izza !.0'a� i. 4Ow IY.•p� 6Y 60 l�O ww� .iO4 c <.Sii W6 LO.5432 4 J� � W 1. C09� CrppK � Oy D� OrdOY'w.MYi�'S .ct �:L ' V�i� • � V 6: #. r.0 Ab OS Y.��rfi � ~CYL lsr ��;�� 'C C4Ya' AWN& N_Y �G a�N �N ~ N O ^NAYOI OA QO ~ PO Ai�9..A..)Y<'L YOLLY Or �' CCNNpp�ppp�C r'b�CC 01 y A HCOL 7"53 7N AMyyyyyPO��•►AOO KCNC>yy i6�a0 -ENO tl CLY Ms YY i`JYY�.�N�{OJ VyYi�P� L OY7 Yf9�{� �..^ � RLN �y .C��OOX.NwY. j ^d °coN:i G„ •-y'ca AL 6`00'HVC41��yC4 u �. G•� �9Y� YG 'v N 9� 6N2L �.M dYY LN qON �Q y�ye 4 QY~ �.0 GM ON�L+. • YJ � PAS✓ N�J) O.O GAY 04 y �~~S UuN�i� r ^gVy N Ybi j,'" V CN OV C` G V ^< C C altl d s i �� ^UC Na{0� Yy ��GO °LU -L�■■ OYq� Gb ry�ryr� g O Y C N L C 4 V C N V �• d N �N�,n c uL ` ..� $•LY Sp aN y....nq � uY+. i�: '�wsN. uYa''3LL °NOyc tl�« sy =fie q N� aY� modZ .tlY,�{� + VY�y�y Vf..16Y V1�•.��1� �d9 aH pNp NL GY ��YCLi -Nq YOY�O Y VNYyG Nd� 11000 N G- Y O)La = G Y; �r NYM VK. L yCL� �`' O y ` i A y0.. y4W b y b. ^�iN Y� �N Q N C Y�wy. L L G`6 w9 V Y «L� C�O Y6YYr 4r 9r Y pt a w.V j� >p NNY- O`✓ -f.Y 6 Y rP *O Y C CO {��uYl ha6 «M = c- GGa H~ 3r6 V� °L ^LLVU'Cr.'H)O C i1 p�_� tl Q`r V -sqptlf NwVCG GG YY YO.r. �.G.NwM 3 N L ✓� ...r O.O< Ly �wY� O III yVy YCtl L01 byGy L ��VGa CA C!L �Lf. Vb 0-0 C L q tly p 6 ' A, [. G C N ptY- 1 u O4'a L C� EJY6.NO �.2s s .22 3:6 ?^ p Yyw NEE hpCC M � LN NL+f� O� Ca4 �L A =N L b!3:6 IL z Cw.As q A~ya. w �. wii «tY,l • oo yoFSOy. O{1 -�uC az LY C iO QCyy COQ• }V}�e G '.2 1' qYLO G- yY - sit„ Y Or Ms -CN fib .'` o O y Y Y M N y J V= 4GtY) •. L m C N O M .. lb tl b. L Y G T ��.4 MpCcG) ` V N Y VU _ - G y V Y � . Y =•• _OC YY p�p 8 �- 8� „ - •'^ €Va �.tlw Iyys y 0 N 4OI «S� y4 -Y - M 'b^4 r° �dMY NC N >MYO j y 9.w G> V tl Y M G a 4 $ Y O N O.- Y LL y s O qCy o66 Yr uo ° +.aa •N," 6 C N L Y V C P� = 4 O C YyyI Y Y VY V YOM o$: 'y _L �^ C'YG M N 6� •)y t�`�eLii NNy■ V=uE Ya GgVL CY it) qGq O y�4� N CYww.pL izza !.0'a� i. 4Ow IY.•p� 6Y 60 l�O ww� .iO4 c <.Sii W6 LO.5432 4 J� � W 1. v a w e. ua\v ~i. M ` �r S ae y No OZ. .- r t9lL .8 �AOQ e 14 t!z G —� S p�� y Y �U °s IL O pQ4 Ing ra•H LQ Cp2L ^ • yam D C y haM b N VY S pp U CYi a L. GO _s6w gL •.N ^y v agge « — us yIN °�u U�. cu" a YES v. aVCV Y por VC Z =rN AMµ : ^ N - Y � vve y v$ ;NL wu'WY.e set ^�6 Ncfk•� a °S<S u "w CO N_b i!al ft wN YY■■^ �Lt1Y VV =� dLMb O�y� av Es Y .p d 7 �o9P Nnus « ='YS�¢ wuP {. C� �0 -. M roVw H`GM S`4v.6 ��N i ice° a w e. ua\v ~i. 1 "l�C L EO T y S ae y LLB D ^i• Y VG t9lL .8 �AOQ CA:[ t!z G —� S p�� y Y 4Q4 IL O ZE LQ Cp2L np � S Y ♦py. 0OJ{6. b N VY S O■ M P� MO yy �T�•1 Vw Cy�4 gL •.N ^y v �y6y ■ yIN �p +Y VL6� 0 L �0 =rN C CY^ �• b NY N ~� SIR —�N G yy CO N_b i!al ft p N >c e �YN��.ii. 4�i� {L L w � V. -.� {. C� �0 -. M YVN LbM I�Os wOVY YV p C�•;iiL �wq6 N I•f 1 Vl O i � —�Y �V^ • `O �u Off' OY�A yz��y• �!�M� b-V. Oy 1-13 gulp bag b O MM b L.KVN 3. q.�e5� +�YpY Jm aL" hvN ~��`a� Sit! GMT �.Y.CL ^t2 a Q Y �.4 ^~ -rS"M p UN: s c DSS Ya VE V 4 YM ^O + c • yL• ° L. si w o 1b. 2 Y'O am `°r J�.rJ ficYy L,wu� r ^' O �t°iW 4 600 YV. YI �� AWO. N N V� GN cmv q0 BLS c. iri ~i. 1 "l�C L EO T y S ae y LLB D ^i• Y VG t9lL .8 CA:[ t!z G —� S p�� y 7S 4Q4 IL O ZE LQ Cp2L 0996 bQOL b N VY S O■ M P� MO yy �T�•1 Vw �CO O_ gL •.N ^y 5G �µ �y6y yINO \�` Id —�N G yy CO N_b i!al ft p N >c e �YN��.ii. 4�i� {L L w � V. -.� {. C� �0 -. M YVN LbM �y� ■p bC.- Ou.ON OV Ma V C WY�i yOyl WPM DY iVV W E Em ask jjsFss zz w y r Y N s Rost + g a f .SYi Y� Ly a V L� a = ++ww � -22 SIN rp p 6 Y it tl Y J GO P^ °``.�. -S 4 V� Y .q �Y q�VLLy M. tU! ^YL CY �N • LL. ^ Y /.'� NL•a�Cy. p■ Yp Y C A�pO1p11y VgCN`Y X 7 NV M S « .0.. d�MyI �1 yYy _My(Cy� 2 qC R.. 4OYaa9AP ^'J CCAL 2. ° ^ ^°O M�Sag CpL Y�YSCL V O�qC 00y1`�` � I y� Q Sy �' pYY Lp �YtY L�. Z:. S I K O V 1..0 OI li� V? 3 N3 V O v y Y; L C Y YYN G C 9 Y L D d i CC ,pO -W Ofr I." VD Tw KM G 1% O' n w at E C Y La q Y01Y /1 C+MY L C Oi6° V �1'O- LOd q IL �� -� P OfD�-Y■■ t°iu� Yy •6t1 =V V W Y 4 �Y �pL/ L u r `� cR T C Y6 9 V u - L. i! — L r o 7. a S. • 1��_Y 7 V ^8� ON�f LS s;5 N 9 p 2'! r {/ iI 1 v Y • ' �.. 4 9•° O. M 8.0 0 N• HG O O • O 0 SOte■ �.M-M r �010 M 'J Y-V wii re- LT �' P/r .X O y f.i�COV� C y, V YV. C7wyy w � yW LpyuY �C ��C c LV^0 IpK i 2 1yi p r. $ iii �p =L.r ftL - $'r ^dos '3.:.5ffpp�r1 wC1 •- °p .'�{./'j `€ • g� ^�. N3. -LY'�� DN CLOY 83'V. •_: s Ni Q -p 5 �M p00. ` LsOy �p�yC Q` c-� Ya YO ww Yp w r 01-4 Nom ^a�� » p Yi q C° M Y --till Vu�M tz' �NC ."0Q1i • M °- OY 5SO Lp tip. td O y .' �- _3 3 `N ` 6 QI tM NOR /I � �Or10N00 q G pV OI S r'' q ti e V '^ g �eLLY� -' �e1,�.(• +C R r Y N A LLG6 y q Y Y w3 C g C Yy qpr` -° pN -C�V.`i Z. wy ■ +a 9 L�y314q' {O�OCIS O /C:OM�sP Gw ^ V WN° 4iVV F Y L C ep s d V -S. M Aq Y V N 4 O Q �4 to -Lv K.S f��.212 -z; V KD1V gV F�� ` O p y v' SSE a i FBI V L � ' O N y Ste: « ` � L gy L u� w ssu CZ YyY RSA bey soy g VS~ C rr NpY Loa p yam"' +i C�w�• N �{�� fir' ysYYY � � � �• +y Y � r� �E� C Y •'1L 6� D�•�vN a �,1 b■�� C �+ �_ a_ � 4'060 y� Vo _Wy ■1. LL �•• CJ tY LVL 'ate 6 yN SL Y A W w Y b L V n W y■++ V Y. Y� C W D» Y C �� O y= -M ° 1r N ` V ■ LtY M Y N N A E a Y 055 NO L&g -Ly 6r WV »LLLI i6 Y'O K� 'C I�b •.Ci F yW t6» O N A t 4fl Y `�► ml �I �I o •� NI AI .4I Y M a- 4 OI A W � y �o L Y L H c� 5° a� 4 a� Y L 0 en y V M N � y■C Y v u Y 4V O p Y YYL � o N A w� _o o� M Y V ■ N N L r v Y M V W ' 1.1 a Y v u' Z' w u 0 7 O N a° §t a +� gVw aJ'6 N S^ L t�C +YJ6 L.00 `Y L Y N Y � ■C Vw� O Y Y�N CY Y N N ri J V sA V� N.w.OtJ • �� p �1H Y r au M O c I. »x0401 1•�. p ShippE In gP Y N � � ■{ yO y=�r YLy�y1 Y {y gS ^ e 'v :, 12 od u1°L 1s�� N 010 \ rig- eo x y vY NV. NYiIC �Y�11. p '�YNY �Owwr�a ' YLw a� 9 N R �• 5 I] 11 0 ' LLU Ypp ' VM1r A HYU ■CY N' nVS r YY M Q ..cc �,+ L GaY M C N V QV byn G1 ate• LQ `"} ��v V FG�� y NM9 k{qf Y 4 f:C We 1 YYYw Y C M ire C A L O `L1 IS Rt !F. 1K� $w q4�C YrtlV O MY C r'N ■ 4�� IE OY SG at L' yY cz wN0 ay o!"CO C ACp y M LY: a� ONe ig agr;E -SLA Y yuYj wpG pypA QC 1 =Y� YA F._C •_�8 r VYy" � LYC tL y� Z4• I rNQ .i i�N. Y _ N� pV 4 pJ�j[ A • L Y 4 Y p t' t N � ` SI H Q S � Y . Y �� N ii r. � ?. a � • '°'' ; � � Y ..i r ` S � YU F. • �y r R Y q LC C Q�'p V MrMp3 ` �OV -a*-- L' > pYS �$ yr �'y. N�y L r9 V y! ^.l �_ Y�yr ti{� Y ' '. Q>L�}} LL � YY `` ��rr ■N ,� ; 4C V p Qy. Q'�L COsl�~ ■ del s QM aay<. R -mow Y +« y �4oC aL _Y NCnC• aY uY �Y Sts Y Y Y1 Ci�■■� �r �L{��w. V� 4C O� 3=9 �4 LLYp�+r�C z6ipVA ? q K Y C Y L w w 4N QGCyy i �Ml. .jam KW Y� +rC7 f..4M Y; L .4X F. LJV3 itdu`. FNC Y � .t O 4 Ch ttil � ririi w its S M L u7 �j ro c�f N w wL O 1l,�y 9 C YQCw 1? A � Q K KwG. Ow y der N p! rw y A w V O w a yu4 t 0 ' LLU Ypp ' VM1r A HYU ■CY N' nVS r YY M Q ..cc �,+ L GaY M C N V QV byn G1 ate• LQ `"} ��v V FG�� y NM9 k{qf Y 4 f:C We 1 YYYw Y C M ire C A L O `L1 IS Rt !F. 1K� $w q4�C YrtlV O MY C r'N ■ 4�� IE OY SG at L' yY cz wN0 ay o!"CO C ACp y M LY: a� ONe ig agr;E -SLA Y yuYj wpG pypA QC 1 =Y� YA F._C •_�8 r VYy" � LYC tL y� Z4• I rNQ .i i�N. Y _ N� pV 4 pJ�j[ A • L Y 4 Y p t' t N � ` SI H Q S � Y . Y �� N ii r. � ?. a � • '°'' ; � � Y ..i r ` S � YU F. • �y r R Y q LC C Q�'p V MrMp3 ` �OV -a*-- L' > pYS �$ yr �'y. N�y L r9 V y! ^.l �_ Y�yr ti{� Y ' '. Q>L�}} LL � YY `` ��rr ■N ,� ; 4C V p Qy. Q'�L COsl�~ ■ del s QM aay<. R -mow Y +« y �4oC aL _Y NCnC• aY uY �Y Sts Y Y Y1 Ci�■■� �r �L{��w. V� 4C O� 3=9 �4 LLYp�+r�C z6ipVA ? q K Y C Y L w w 4N QGCyy i �Ml. .jam KW Y� +rC7 f..4M Y; L .4X F. LJV3 itdu`. FNC Y � .t O 4 ^ITit OF RANCHO CUCAAMONGA ST.P F71 REPORT i S DA1E, November 14, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Buckingham, Plann' Technician SUBJECT: VARIANCE 90 -11 - FIDELITY CONSTM;CTION A request to allow a free - standing decorative arch struct,ire to be located within the front yard setLck •)f a single family lot within the Very Low Residential District (1 >;, dwelling units per acre) at 10482 Almond. Avenue - APN: 1074 - 121 -26 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Rediew Variance request. B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vaca, 1; Very Low Residential (1 -2 duelling units per acre) South - Single Family Residential; Very Low Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acr=) East - Single Family Residential; Very Low Residi:^ ial (1-2 dwelling units per acre) Cost - Single Family Residential; Very Low Residential (1 -2 dweliing units per acre) C. General ' an Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential (1 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per ac -e) South - V y Low Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) East `:pry tow Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) West - vary Low Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) 11. ANALYSIS: A. General: The, applicant is requesting to construct decgrative arch 13 feet high and 16 feet wide within the front yard se0ack (see Exhibit "0 "). The dwelliny unit is feet from the face of curb, tht vinimum in the Very Low Res U Mtial District, s th the propa3ed structure encroaching 9-feet into tha required rront yard setbace, and 28 feet from ttiA_ face of ITEM I ° 0701 -02 11-14 -90 PC Agenda 5 of 6 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -11 - FIDELITY CONSTRUCTION November 14, 1590 Page 2 curb (see Exhibit "C ") . The public right -of -way in front of, the house is 12 feet wide and is currently undeveloped. On the east side of the house included in the Haven Avenue right- of-way is a 12 -foot wide community trail. The lot is 122 feet wide by 185 feet deep (approximately 22,500 square feet) and is regular in shape. The surrounding lots are all similar in size and shape. The Development Code prohibits structures within the required front yard setback. However, it does allow for solid structures (fences, walls, hedges, or similar view obstructing structures). not exceeding 3 feet in height, within the front yard setback. Further, a combination of solid and open structures not exceeding 6 feet in height, are allowed to encroach into the front yard setback providing that the top 3 feet are 90 percent open and non -view obstructing. The proposed 13 -foot high decorative arch would not meet the criteria to allow such a scructure in the front yard setback due to its height. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The following facts would not support the Variance request: 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical h. _-Wip inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. 11 1p arch is a decorative, not a j functional, architectural elinent; hence, any hardship is self- imposed by the applicant. 2. That there are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. The arch could have been allowed if the house had not been plotted at the mini^um from yard setback. 3. That strict or literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owi rs of other properties in the same zone. 4. That the granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limi�.Iations on other properties classified in the same zone. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper as a public hearing, the property was posted, and notices wec-e sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT BAR 90 -11 FIDELITY CONSTRUCTION November 14, 1390 Rags 3 Ask V. RECOMMENDATION- Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Variance 9O -11 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Denial. However, should the Commission find evidence to support l the requir -4 findings, tNrn a Resolution of Approval could be prepared fr idoptior on your next Consent Calendar. f Res 'wily s 'tied 1.. Brad ler s City Planner BB:O$ /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit IV' — Site Alan Exhibit ''D" Perspective Sketch Resolution of Denial FIDELITY CONSTRUCTION 12419 3UNYCREEK LN. CERRITOS, CA 90701 08/31/90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RE: VAP *ZANCE SUBJECT PROPERTY: 10482 ALMOND AVE., RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 OWNER'S NAME: Y. X. JOU TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: FOR THE PURPOSE OF HOME IMPROVEMENT, WEB FIDELITY CONSTRUCTION, ON BEHAIF OF M.R. Y. X. JOU INTEND TO BUILD AN ARCH IN THE FRONT YAID. THE CITY CODE REQUIRES THE SETBACK TO BE 42 + 5 FEET FROl' THE FACE OF THE CURT. BUT THE FRONT YARD IS ONLY' 37 FEET III DEPTH, THEREFORE, REQUEST THE PERMISSION TO HAVE THE ABOVE SAID ARCH Tb BE BUILT WITH 3? FEET MINIMUM RESTRICTION. THE INTENDED ARCH AND FLCY7ER BED ARE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE J� AML WITH THE STYLE OF TY.E SAID HOUSE AND IT DOES NOT INTERFERE THE SURROUNDING OF NEIGHBORHOOD SCENERY. YOUR APPROVAL IS HIGHLY APPRECIATED. TRULY YOURS, FIDJZLITY JCONSTRE=ION AUG XING ZHANG CC: Y. K. JQU�e�6! Z v VY/ anti ley 1 c a+ N (y[ - - — —.. —`,.— — �.. Sig 54.611 .■— �'. .Ott r U �' .y .`►� SS •L►t ..J� pt riC g � •�s n � '�i rZ ♦n i ' ' fV I A kV ,.9'� Ze•41 SS•SL rs. l� ��. - - - ----1, - _ S0�r '•tr t'� �:ip�r Oa•IS ^`fig {VJ ^_ Ir js�� trLB•tz{ r r �� 'tf SC WOO Welt t k .� HAEN V A.Vt t _ a • r- e' ti ley 1 c a+ N (y[ �N 'I .. ARCH . a a ,`'� � k . � i ,i'A :-�` ��\ � _ ro.', t� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF rHE PLANkIr G COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOPPIP', DENYING VARIANCE NO. 90 -I1 , FOR A F"I..A'E- STANDING DECOR 171VE ARCH WITHIN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK LOCATED AT 1048 ALMOND STREET IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1 -2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN; 1074- 121 -26 A. Recitals. (i) Fidelity Construction has filed an application for the issuance of a Variance No. 90 -11 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 14th of November 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolv ion have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, deterr;ned, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented io thin Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on November 14, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together- with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 10482 Almond Street with s street frontage of 122 feet and lot depth of 185 feet and is presently improved with a single family residence; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of that site consists of a single family residence, the property to the east is a single family residence, and the property to the west is a single family residence. (c) The application contemplates the construction of an arch, 13 feet high and 16 feet wide, to frame the front yard ,entry door and encroaching 9 feet into the required front yard. Alh -g C PLANK "YG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, VAR 5a 11 ,FIDELITY CONSTRUCTION November 14, irrd0 Page 2 (d) The existing house is plotted at the 37 -foot minimum front Yard setback permittold' within the Very Low Residential District. s (e) The subject site is approximately 22,500 square feet in area with a rear yard depth of approximately 110 feet from the house to the rear property line. back of the (f) The arch is designed as a free - standing, decorative architectural element to frame the front structural entry and is not necessary for support of the house, nor is it necessary to meet any City regulation or guideline. c (g) All other properties in the surrounding neighborhood conform to the front yard setback requirements. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and Loncludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would not result in practical' difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the Alk property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district, (d) That the granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the iirv, Cations on other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will be detrimental to the public health, safety, 6r welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upo-u the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application subject to each and every condign► set forth below. S. The Secretary to this'Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Ct_"+ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VAR 10 -11 - FIDELITY CONSTRUCTION Noveriiber 14, 1090 Page 3 Aft .APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TR DAY OF NOVEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ',Y: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller. Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Ccmmission of the City of Ranchd Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the forgrnoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamoqa, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of November 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: , WS: COMMISSIONERS: AOL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSt I DATE: TO: "ROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ' 4 November 14, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90 -78 rl1AJJl /UALKAU 7ne proposed development--of-at truck rental , easing, and maintenance facility, including a maintenance and administration building, covered fuel island, drive -thru wash building, and parking area for 129 vehicles, located at the west side of Santa Anita Avenue, north of 4th Street in the General Industrial' District (Subarea 14) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan APN: 229- 331 -6. lItm d I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requesteds Approval of a Corditional. Use Permit, issuance of a Negative Declaration, and approval of the conceptual site plan, grading plan.,, landscape plan, and building elevations. B. Surreending Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Subarea 14, General Industrial South - Vacant; City of Ontario, M2- Manufacturing East - Manufacturing b Distribution; Subarea 14, General Industrial West - Flood Control /Utility Easement /Vacant; Subarea 14, _ General Industrial C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - City of Ontario, industrial Cast - General Industrial West - General Industrial D. Sit. Characteristics: The site is presently vacant with no rigor can vegetation. The site slopes approximately two percent from north to south. lItm d PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REMT CUP 90 -18 PITASSI /OALMAU November 14, 1990 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided ffice 1,950 1/250 8 plaint. Bays: 5 bays 3 +2 /bay 13 Truck Wash 1 stall 2.5 /wash 3 stall TOTAL 24 28* * In addition to the 28 spaces provided, a total of 78 spaces are proposed for rental truck parking and 21 spaces are proposed for trailer parking. II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: The current proposal for a Ryder Truck Rental, leasing, and maintenance facility is the third in a series of similar projects proposed for the west side of Santa Anita Avenue north of 4th Street. The current proposal is scaled down in scope from the second proposal in that there is no separate corporate office building proposed now. The si,.e for the current project has been reduced in size and will be located in the area. toat was proposed for the first facility, approximately 300 feet north of 4th Street. B. General: Ryder Truck is proposing to constru ;, a 1.0,300 square foot single story administrative office and truck maintenance building including a 2,280 square foot vehicle wash building and refueling facility. The proposed d,svelopment will serve as a regional office and service facility for the retail rental of trucks. The office and maintenance buildings have been designed with unifying architectural materials for the facades, primarily including gray and buff colored, fluted, and split -face concrete block with white and tan exterior plaster, and reflective glazing. C. Special Considerations: 1. Visibility From the 1 -15 Freeway: The close proximity of the 1 -15 Freeway to the proposed site, necessitates special considerations for the quality of f,ite design, architecture, and landscaping. Landscape screening of outdoor vehicle and equipment storage areas. from the freeway is provided along the western edge of the site and within the parking lot vehicle storage area. Screening of the vehicle storage areas has further been provided with 8- foot high screen walls around the perimeter of the site.' 11 E PLANNING commissION STAFF REPORT CUP 90 -18 - PITASSI /DALMAU November 14, 1990 Page 3 The screen walls would be architecturally compatible with-- the buildings. Landscaping is also proposed within tv setback along Santa Anita Avenue, and along the north and south edges of the site, in conjunction L`th screening the parking and storage areas. 2, Flood Zone "A ": The subject property is located within a f load zone an is subject to storm water inundation from Day Creek Channel on the western edge of the site until the channel is constructed. A two- phased plan is proposed to provide landscaping which screens the site and m.,Itigates negative impacts as a result of flooding across the western half of the property. Because of the flooding pr;tential, Phase I landscaping would be less than what wop3d noY�ially be reya.ired. Under Phase I Landscape Plan (se* E)(,hib t "F- 1"), the site would have no trees across. the rear portion of the northern and southern edge of the truck storage area. *,.;i conjunction with Phase l landscaping, a wrought iron fence is proposed, instead of the ultimate proposed 8- foot high decorative screen wall across the rear portion of the north and south property lines. This design will allow storm water overflow to go from north to south, 'relatively unimpeded, across the rear parking area of the site. Phase I Landscape Plan with the wrought iron fence alternative will be constructed as part of the proposed development only if construction is to take place prior to flood contro7Tc-hannel improvements at Day Creek - Mannel being started. If construction will take place during or after the Day Creek Channel improvements are begun, then Phase I1 Landscape Plan (see Exhibit 7-111) is to be . mplemented. Phase II landscaping consists of installing trees spaced close together for screening along the north and south property line and the removal of the wrought iron fence and replacement with decorative walls to match the - proposed masonry walls. The Conditions of Approval for this project have p.°ovisions ensuring that the appropriate landscape and wall treatments will be implemented with the corresponding improvements at Day Creek Channel. D. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, Tolstoy, lit -reviewed a proposed project on August 2 and September 20, 1990. At the September 20, 1990 meeting, the Committee recommended approval subject to the following: 1. The trees in the middle of the rear parking area should Uz planted in 3 -foot high "raised" concrete planters. 2. The white plaster background for the iY:dividual letter Sign should be flush with the building face so as not to appear like a can sign (see Erbibit "D "). Rather than use internal illumination fog the sign, a ground mounted source should be provided. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT :UP 90 -I8 - PITASSI /DALMAU November 14, 1990 Page 4 11 3, The trash enclosure should be architecturally treated to emulate the building walls and include a decorative concrete blocs ;ap the same as the perimeter wall. E. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project and determined that together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, including provisions for site storm water drainage, the project is consistent with the General Plan, the Industrial Specific Plan, and with all applicable State, County, and local codes. F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial. Study has ben completed by the applicant. Part iI of the Environmental Checklist, completed by staff, found that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment due to flooding, there will not be a significant effect in this case because of the mitigation measures incorporated in the Conditions of Approval. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The` project, as conditioned, is consistent wits the Industrial Specific Plan and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan, the Development Code, and all applicable City Standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper as a public hearing, the property has been iosted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 90 -18, subject to the Conditions of Approval, through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respe lly s fitted Brad e City Planner BB :BA /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A° - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Grading Plan Aft Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Truck Maint. & Office Building Elevations Exhibit "E" Truck Wash and Fuel Station Elevations Exhibit "F" Landscape Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions �— 4% *E V *1 L" t a F t i I Elf J " ` ` ' f -VIO, � �i�s:,, �'! � � i% '" =;- Sri �- -•�. `+� s w '� -� Ul s si 04 �iA is 9i !iAli ate r fi3p a A (t /, . l ° y } A# # a° £ 3;x7 =^at ;�t i�j�4 d =�ss��{�f 2£iLlix #i1 i� !� 4 +e 1i`,� n' i '''•t•S�.r !.. �! a�'f�di � � �� ti; }i��a�Aa�� i�a�id� S ■a fi} ,i �lAir�� " S� 'ti ! a.I s!#� q_lid ^T s #Aa3.'fr# #Swage. i-1.fYA • = ss; #a !a !A -1 ad s �A ialtd1° eta s }; ids i! 9 h sA 9 � § A a A a a` a }•a {� a j y �' g x t xi; dx !12;159 s x' d { ; aTai9 �} ,° i= a l ii I,- - SIslTi# vA[ a x° #= iA #3 i�_ a �tx �d }i S i333F. Ai A a oa!el .�i s }a i asl as a: a ?.d 2" a ;; Tex a!; °� P$ '! qt% : it 4 � ° e � d E -. � � r � -i �:TZkr•2�� la. IatAa ti ' �ldA 1lAfA d1s =� #d 9 a }= * � 111 i . s i w C`" �i 7 A f t KE' R II Y,• 1 Ing i 1 J �— 4 ! ■r. i } : �; . a • -�. i _ � � jai, ,;;, �;; � '� 1 'ill <,{� ._ F ,. — f- :r :-+f-- m �-+F'- .,as.. •-- ?f —,_—.: f-in. —''�-a ... �j � � � � ��: i `� .4s Olf�"� ^CO's i bP M� PO tXM• PPr i � /�. w R ` 3.1a t1rNS rJR• uj Lo IT w.: t�n,a..,awGna ne�r.lii.Pp wia �4i�i '� /t:J L- �b -i u �s s 17 � t V + film ti .J 9 4' 1w 1 o z' I � -1 Ti 1 1 d r• i �� N Y 't b f 1 ' j a-I i r= j I tr3 l 41 � z V RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING commiSSI0N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC MONGA,.CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -18 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TRUCK RENTAL,, LEASING, AND MAAINTENAKE FACILITY CONSISTING OF 2 BUILDINGS TOTALING :12580 SQMRE FEET ON 4.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL. DISTRICT (SUBAREA 14) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SANTA ANITA AVENUE, NORTH OF 4TH STREET, AND P)AXING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT 'THEREOF APN: 229 -331 -6 A. Recitals. (i) oi>`assi /Dalwau hdt, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional USa Permit No. 90 -I8 as described in the title of this Resolution. Here`nafteir in 01s' Resolution. subject Conditional Use Pennit request is rek- red t-- as "tlhe application." (ii) On the '14th of N --ember 1990 *w2 'Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ,_aiducted a duly' noticed public hearing on the application and concluded sal(di hearing on that date. (iii) All legal priarwv1;sites prior to the adoption of this Resolution � have occurred. B. Resolution. NQ4, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, getermiaed, andsr- isolved by the Planning Coranission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1, This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts i set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to tF s Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on November 14, 19VO, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Carmision hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the -°n-t, side of Santa Anita Avenue, north of 4th Street witN a sLree frontage of 324.76 feet on Santa Anita Avenue and with lot depths of 558.73 feet and 556.56 feet along the north and south property lines, respectively, and is pre, ?ntly unimproved and vacant; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NC. CUP 5:1.18 - PITASS11DALMAU November 14, 1490 Page 2 (b) The property to the north or the subject site is vacant within the General industrial category of the Industrial Specific Plan, the property to the south of the site is vacant M2- Manufacturi0g within the City of Ontario, the property to the east is improved with commercial office and Industrial buildings in the General industrial area, and the property to the west contains a public utility corridor and railroad right- of:way in the General Industrial area. (c) The property is located partially within a Flood Zone "AI and therefore, is subject w potential flooding from the overflow of Day Creek Channel. Wrought iron fencing, in conjunction with minimal landscaping within the flood zone, mitigates flood 6axards. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public ° hearing and upon the specific fi'adings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 in d". 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the propc;ed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes o" the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use', together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use ceqplies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with f-'I California Environmental Quality Act of 1910 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, Planniao division i) If the project proceeds prior to the Day Creek Channil being operational, then Phase I landscaping (interim design), including screen walls with wrought iron fencing, but excluding screening trees across the rear portion of the northern and southern ,edge of the truck staraga area, shall be installed prior to occupancy. lJ D PLANNING COhGWISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90 -i8 - PITASSI /DALMAu November 14, 1990 Page 3 2) If the project is constructed after the Day Creek Channel is rperationai, then Phase 11 landscaping (ultimate design), including solid masonry wails and screening of trees around the perimeter of the, site -hall be constructed 3) An 8 -foot decorative masonry screen wail shall replace any wrought iron, fencing that would be installed as a result of the project being constructed prior to thj Day Creek flood control improvements beinil operational. To insure ccnstructior of said wall, a perfo;matice agreement with prcper se cr:rity and right -of- entry shall be approved by `the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 4) The screen wall and ,:wrought iron fencing, if necessary for flood 4introl purposes, shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Planner. 5) Tail, dense plant rt:aterial shall be provided around the perimeter of the site except along Santa Anita Avenue and as modified by Phase I landscaping, if necessary. 6) Details of all exterior light fixtures including wall lights and parking lot lights shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to the - issuance of building permits. 7) Individual, channelized letter signs shall be used on the buildings. The white piaster background for the individual 'letter signs shall be flush with the building face so as not to appear like can signs. If wall sign lighting is provided, then a ground mounted source shall be provided - internal illumination is prohibited. 8) `Me trash enclosure shall be architecturally treated to emulate the building walls and include a decorative concrete block cap the same as the perimeter wall. 9) An enriched paving treatment shall be provided at the driveway entrance on Santa Anita Avenue to emphasize the entrance and, at a minimum, colored and saved retardant finish concrete i PLANNING CCPMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90 -18 - PITASSI /DALMAU November 14, 1990 Page 4 11 fields with minimum 12 -inch wide concrete bands shall be used to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 10) `,e trees in the middle of the rear parking area shall be planted in 3 -foot high "raised" concrete planters. 11) Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for review and approval by the City Planner for the project to encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 12) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of the use. 3 Engineering Division 1) An in -lieu fee, as reimbursement for the previously undergrounded overhead utilities (electrical) by the developer on the east side, of Santa Anita Avenue, shalt be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. 2) A storm drain system, including catch basins, shall be desigosd and constructed within Santa Anita Avenue to connect the proposed storm drain shown on the Day Creek Channel plans. The size and length shall be determined by the final drainage study. This storm drain is to be included in the City Master Plan Storm Drain System. Therefore, ire developer shall be eligible for fee credit and reimbursement of this cunt. 3) If the project proceeds prior to the pay Creek Channel being operational, flood protection measures shall be provided in accordance with the accepted Preliminary Flood Report and as substantiated by a Final Flood Report as approved by the City Engineer, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.. CUP 90 -18 • PITASSI /DALMAU November 14, 1990 Page 5 4? The developer shall c ^ordinate the construction of the project so that the ultimate design for the walls and landscaping along the north and south property 'lines are constructed after the channel is operational. 5? Landscaping within the "Limited Use Areas for the project driveway shall be approved by the City Engineer, A tree maintenance easement shall be provided for any parkway trees that need to be placed on private property. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OR RWAO CUCAMONGA BY: Carry T. McNiel,, Chairman ATTEST: Brad u iier, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly �- ;,.roduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of November 1990, by the ollowirg vote -to -wit: AYES= COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COM,NfISSIONERS: i YaFu #`Sg 1 " �SS:wy�" a5 I$ « =fig ®NSF ^,L wppLC s,s �y. »4GFO�4V N d u g a `s jai BAN al It .4` yO 6g Y fill= �IL~ >Yt 7J O, Y 1.we p e i • �> Hl v "y MME Y001 �neVVS iTM Mb``� N ^Yxr 6t pay g a yy p Cs �Y fV. �L Nr � ~YwiY jw(� p° ^W y� b��w NvC YNFY ttT77 Y 7. t Y L Y w .° Gy''s^<.:a.». $fi 0 q Y is .. ps all : e ��» I. t 0 E'] .%S i :d gLiy " b l� ^ E � X2A" 9 $S �« 4,-9"1 a s-3 EVE 0. V d't � .. ✓Cq Aw EO 5-,X- - $XY 1 Q Y¢ . agC 'M �` 4• r S - M+ T ^.3g d a C Y a Q C O 1.9 >Y � 9 `�yK ^$� e C L S V ^ M} :s^j N�y 4 lY pppip �ngqgQ��=a� � a . vns +M ,T^.N4aa g . . w 9 M Sf d +w 3o r^. rd6y si O1oi &$`tsY'C'n �a'8�' ° ^`p rr +. G,.i »_ C ACO L,IL M ^Grp$�w N +. ::1 �OuN( uy qV ax v. L ��1 NG tS g C O�U Y ■GN v i1`Ly�� 9My ■`.gppp�p� LSC€ � rg • A � a K w' e • 0 N Y Y°. $j N � C4 p.5 +Yu+��EE B.Ls C OM � LA+ O.0 L CY Tpp• ° r9 CC {{/� M M L �►°yyy L CIG -,a'Y YpLy OI J. ^�� 101 6V CW UY \K{I M�w��0' L° ■GC ypppp p yCa u S O {4N ^ j� Y q p�p Y O E • N T"NA VL°Y[ O g C+O 3{cL1 y1 Y'Y C iM.1 O�^ " K ®�d• OLNY.Y� ��GNr��NYLt Y Kv.NN4SGp� ERG ^ ^,+ �OC KrW"� NL� n G 1 �1 GC d 6 +6 i 9"L LssN + MM NY a =t xg 0 yy 7 ^ s^ 444 pp .2Ci 0 O. -a i w�� C ` 5 »il yy Y YN �¢YO us Yi" r. NY �r s$ ""� e%S d� gi TA6 's`L �H$xx C ^ N A �+ +^ O�� LryO Ya tl� ^•C Yy� .�pp�NN O "dm SA L ^� "J.�� ^` Mr�111� {�q� =�tY Dpp® d03. �� q �^N aOY §0 .88F.MY L Y. AR. YL+ Ur. Y {Nd�wQ �eC... Ci :3ayp i��y •`� V O rY Y� rON yV �S{J (1D� L? ! +p yp � yN�Cy`Y�tl + CN aN 12" 6�1q �., •lO °Cyc S�YJ�°tt1� YMtlli' cregL &.9 O' C C 1 O C11 �Y!� ~ 'S ^ p + M N Rw K ^ W Kp. O O CC yVV° Cary �_� Y rwo "j s.Y� 4^ U.� ^�tva d +raY '" 1 �1L ' „: 2 :! —; rY •Cyr P N N$„� C�-r Z. d s..y u o o A3s A4 s all 3Y$ ap NJ� a"Y�j �YMNISeC.YSj o +fi a° esY3N ■ L{-a d. R6 �1 ".y^ ■w Cy pS tl H�dy M NcNGtN Mdp YZ^ �or A C s rd'o g ^o s61ei Y+re{1 r °u' ►v bsCL°yy.C'�� 4f:® g's K i 0 n 0 r i N Q t^ N Y N X < V �1 Y V 6 Y d� f}I . i s r s yY N C ti �N68 �N �Y YC�yo� �� ,��'�::•3y��yYL� o��$� a a �e �$� or•� of S yIIwffffi ^r$ �o° ApAr o�eC4 � 41 NE41`M�VNOy� V)l�FC� p` �•I'L cwL u oY+ o'O' Ya is 44MYG C'!^.qQ %`' 'li G .Z.i q^ -V 4.$s L t O�j0 q N 4^ a= �� `ypV�YVjYNLN SL S cO j�N C� qL�$.•� yaO��mYC.s81. 0�6s0 O! ■. ^CC L ! $! ppppK C Cq Y �1 Yw p M `yyyQQQ� {. yY� NN SA cpcp { �''yj�p1 }�y�.'�Y'� S OaY.p {`�� M�GS1•= „C` ANp OO +��O :^ $ 01V Off! �N i N� m L.� CNngY Y.O U�YY YN� a }0 SV NN as wN "'�' gve CI�gY'O�L a$ a$p Y6L C0 �tN�N (�1199�COY _N !G ¢ �y YW�•WA wLL•Q ° pMp (C��$N. OI �•~N V �43+rN. oYINMC� Y v Y N ■" N I y! d L N 0 G N N. y A O O !w K lee Nyy^ I. NU Y.: {� g- y� CL ^Lg �L/ayY L S S•1 q� «c cp� M L NLAU °NL °Y pi W �� ^ ^e N` �L�yy ,�,q9ao s ^2-y rO brpCQC LM Q A M O tQ Q W° 6 O. M «$� ua5�I �d N� ei u'Sa^ � TL s L $ O Lp r m -_-.s d p� ggg C aN �$00 rs. pp Y ! NN¢ o O y py y p 0 9 N yy! `S my �gaMY 6 C,w E' 41 T ! C NL M^ O,Y u a �aB N +!^ yy�v w O �p C Y�� C ny C NY 4 O 0;3 <�r� R7�� > SO•=N 1Y•O� 4V EV �0�� Y izz O o isms.- y^ QIQ�YG �v 614. u�8,4�MY Fi °L �+$eu i Y vL . I F�^ o^ gW �i't ��1Yn��o�� 4^ NY k C A V.N -CH $O QYeu N�N•iNO Y M =Is, ^ YY W t; pq V • AML �Gi ! <N! W6 pNtiis W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONOA STAFF REPORT OAfE: November 14, 1990: TO: Chairman and Members o` the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner Steve Ross, Ass scant Planner SUBJECT:. ENVIRONMEMTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14535 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY A residential subdivision of 95 single family lots on 18.0 acres of land within the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located *on the northeast corer of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park lane APN: 227- 011 -17. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 'TENTATIVE TRACT 14535 WILLIAM LYON COM ANY - A residential _subdivision of 57 single family lots on 12.4 acres of land within the -Low- Medium Residential District ,(4 -8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located on the south side of Highland Avenue, east of Woodruff Place - APN: 227 - 911 -20. I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff rgcv lends that these itams be continued to the January 23, 1991 Planning Commission meeting per the applicant's request (see Exhibit "A "). Due to market conditions within the economy, the applicant has requested. this 90 -day continuance. Res' ly su itte , Brat e City lanner 88 :ALH:SR /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant 8540 ARCHIBALD, SUITE 8, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91700 • (714) 980-2244 October 05, 1990 Mr. Steven Ross Assistant Planner The City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. BOX 807, Rancho'Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Tentative Tract )Map No's 14535 and 24536 Request for Continuances Dear Steven: The subject tentative tract maps have been processed through Denign and Technical Review Committees and are scheduled for the Planning Commission on November 14, 1990. Due to significant changes in the marketplace, The William Lyon Company hereby requests that the tentative tract maps be removed from the scheduled Planning commission's agenda, and that a 90 day continuance be granted. le understand the city may require a waiver from us relative to its time limit obligations. If such a waiver is. required, please provide us with a proposed document. Thank you in advance for your assistance with our request for the continuanceu. S, /i)ncerely, Gary que �&v Project Manager GLlds cc; Jim Dailey Christine rieiasenburg Stan Morse Lary Ryan REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT 11 CRY OF MCHQfi,t11U0,40NOI Of ANKINA s'fNi%inp Aft AV d ? r D rs DATE: TO: FROM: BY: CITE' OF RANCH(, :AMONGrA STAFF REPORT November 14, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Ping Kho, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENT:.:.' ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL M:4P 13601 BARTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A su w span of acres of a-n unto parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8 ), located; at the north side of Fulton Court and east of Utica Avenue (APN: 209- 144 -71) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as sFowi an U ibis; - B-B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 1.362 acres Parcel 2 - 1.085 acres TOTAL acres C. Existing Zoning: General Rridustrial District (Subarea 8) D. Surrounding Land Use: North - Industrial building under construction South - Industrial building under construction East Vacant West Industrial building under construction - E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: or n - ueneral LnouStrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial F. Site Characteristics: The site is under construction. ITEM M PLANNING CGWISSIOA STAFF REPORT j TENT PARCEL MAP 13601 - BARTON DEVELOPMENT CO NOVEMBER 14, 1990 PAGE 2 II. ANALYSIS. The purpose of this parcel map is to create separate parcels for two separate buildings currently under construction; "on the site. Those buildings wore approved by the Planning Commis<<pn on July 12, 119890 as a part of OR 39 -09. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicarit completedi Part I of the Initial Roy. Staff con ucted a field investigation and completed Part It of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: notices of `Public Nearing have been sent to surrounding property owner's and placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATIONo, It is recommended that the Planning. Co�mtission consider all npu, an elements of the Tentative Parcel Map 13601. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, tnen the adoption of the attached Resolution c ° ; issuance of a Negative Declaration would ` be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye Hanson Senic- Civil Engineer SRH:PK:diw Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit W) Tentative Map (Exhibit "B"? Resolution and - Recommended Conditions of Approval i j I I t m�� r lu L. 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGWEEMG DF4MON 1 llB�2 All 'V ne- ........ ' /n[l ( TnIJt Ifft ZA iatu.r c-so A)t �GCa„tY4TIwI Fus ta.. t,J %fit/ saa[. I *Z'. d 1 GM /if/ 6a/.5 a !rq/. ;MJ I1lI t ial, Id "3l a �� 1 C , ai lf11.7 %� nwT [winr[ !e[wnus ''�. rt rttS.cd � s�r6 �_ `IfF• o .ax,__._...rs�— �"S�i 4 ! JK PARC£LT da,easnairilWna I Nnanti.�.� :- j 1 "s iL' V AA tl�tS.3d frt IIIf3! � •�'MM -r�--•� J V i Z f ` nX! ronu.ucl /sn 114340 � pa 1 1 1_ �Oyf `' wlr [ usaw j� COURT - J Z +bs r !a[ wlnr c , Iia! sow INI ,t / 17glrP Giy 7J1r7 � I /A Pte. N. CITY OF PARCEL MAP /3b0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA - TENTATrvE MAPS ENG NEEMG DAMON on -. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISS!0N OF THE CITY OF 's RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TEmnarVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13601, LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF FULTON COURT AND EAST �F UTICA AVENUE AND'MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209 - 144 -71 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13601, submitted by Barton Development Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 2 pare -ls, the real property situated in the City �f Rancho Cucamonga, County of .3an Bernardino,. State of California, ident €fied as APH: 209- 144 -71 located at the north side of Fulton Court and east of -1,ca Avenue; and WHEREAS', on November 14, 1990, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUeAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings haves -ieen made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General .Plan. 3. That the site' is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage o^ public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: This Commission Finds and certifies t the 'project has been reviewed and considered in comp lance with the Calii ;nia Environmental Quality Act of 1970; and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map 'Number 13601 is hereby approved subject to a "the ttached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 1. A recorded fire protection maintenance agreement shall be obtained since both parcels are provided by the same fire protection and fire hydrart supplies. CYi s'' 1 PLAr'dhNG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT PM 13601 - CARTON DEVELOPMENT CO NOVEMBER 14, 1990 PAGE 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry e , Chairman ATTEST: Brad u F e`r e. -reta ,- I Brad wuller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular m"-,ting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of November, 1990, by the following vote -to- wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CO911MiSSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r �y ens Vj A a Y A H r Zia r iii « r• A .: i €°k Y , € l � : " .1= ga ; I 7°�� a y. • « w "tgm 3$ Ili tz = 6 iybYS NYw � O AM13 -will Ulf Z., Y gill . =✓1 9 _ .2 1 �; a �I \I 11 `I 11 I \I Zi ' . ►, i, _Z m r iii $g � s � S �s �� • +•- ii ; .a S• l{ t t.4 Yr i. rl r �s i %'; �� _� �: � :gig �� •_�_ v y� 3 a a ;Z -XZ eel M.t Og 9s 21 24 .sir�lrdr` 1172 a$ ai a� o` �Qi O N O1 r It 'i .� � � V v 3 O M' � = s gC oa =r`♦Y rp V � v - wax n J/� � yr Sr .f C � 1 i S = . �$y _ m o= ZE. l Is O O :�O iwr � ram Oyr 4 O•B' ✓� • r ` g ``W rOL 'y u3N a NO� S 0. • k-5 N 424 N as. �r �el ��pa0y i.w it '� ® a 4 a ;Z -XZ eel M.t Og 9s 21 24 .sir�lrdr` 1172 a$ ai a� o` �Qi O N O1 r It 'i .� � � V v 3 O M' � = s gC oa =r`♦Y rp V � v - wax n J/� A D L1 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT November 14, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Ping Kho, Assistant Engineer ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PAF subdivision of acres o eow Residential District (2 -4 dwelling L at the west side of Hellman Avenue and sou 202 - 041 -36) is per acre), located of 19th Street (APN: PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as s Town on ,.x: "B" B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 1.27 acres Parcel 2 38 acmes Total T—.W acrez, C. Existing Zoning: Low Density Residential T). Surrounding Land Use: North - Vacant and existing single family residence South - Existing single family residence East- Existing single family residence West - Vacant E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Low Density %si'dential South - Lowe Density fasidential East Lone Density Residential West - Loar Density Residential F. Site Characteristics: The easterly portion of the site currently has an existing single family residence with the majority of the property being vacant. N iq (X IN 14 fit `rte ra ce IN gg ❑k�l II Id 1 I. V! RESOLUTION NO. ANIL IF A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY A°PROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13086 LOCATED AT THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND SOUTH OF 14TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202- 041 -36 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel leap Number 13086, submitted by Robert Lesondak, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 2 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho CuEamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 202- 041 -3G, located at the west side of Hellman Avenue and south of 19th Street; ane. WHEREAS, on November 14, 1990, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised lublic hearing for the above- described map. NON, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING C"ISSION RESOLVES AS FOL, OWS: SECTION 1: That the 1`A owing findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plary. Ank 2. Thst the improvement of the proposed subdivision is vp consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically 4 +table for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse a`Fects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed " and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970; and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTIU 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 13086 is hereby approved subject t-F—B attach -d Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 1. An in lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead ,tilities (telecommunication and electriccl) on the opposite side of Hellman Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final map. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. PLANNING C0141ISSION RESOLUT16N NO. 'PENT PM 13086 K ROBERT LESONOAY NOVEMBER 14, 1990 PAGE 2 2. A request to vacate the excess City storm drainage easement, i adjacent on both sides of the Beryl - Hellman channel at ess roads- Shall be submitted and approved prior to approval of the final map, except for an easement,12' in widsh, to be retained along I the south boundary of Lot "A" to serve the property to the west. 3. The property within the p� ject boundaries West of the Beryl- Kell man channel access road shall be labeled a Lot "A". The Developer shall deed Lot "A" to the adjacent property to the west. 4. A private drainage easement shall be provided over parcel 3 in favor of parcel 2. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF AOVENBER, 1990. i PLANNING CONAIISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Sri:- e , Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, SecreFiry 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Citp of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adeated by the Planning C2vWssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of November, 1990, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: V, ES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERS; E i s i r Y 1 lid III ffi Y � B 9�r ry y •! g!e i. f y w gig` 171 Uf IL B i or• No JT.6. ir IRE 42 fix Sw A PW s B ar r 1 tj ��® • n v w s d g M S \ i wall a t Is4[ •� sy d ` r Y a r Y Y a j 3p 3 e$ Y a b y r y bit p Sc i`� 6Ar V. • L�4 i.� M r A p °aA a I r _ 'X r` � a i yy 8 .•. o v.n ` s Is4[ _w A TO r a r Y Y a j 3p � 2Gx. a b y r �r a V p Sc 6Ar V. • L�4 i.� M r A p 'i ti t x 9 Em O� �q 4 V � » ✓,w SipL w w— Y yr O �. a�� •'.�S � = n`r 666 O.0 SS C PwN CC C 9 Y � G 52 1s Y r6 sb — 0 K� Tp _w l:Gs Y1 !i! 64 j O ( y`S F ;fr` d�.9Y• 1 G iJC ■ 7-3 3 Io_A Y4 OE pg.9 9C M W 4�,/ QY 4S° ✓1� 9 3 r YG O IN r. �C Y9. •� "sN 6r� 'y.^d r yw Y6•• oil �i1� Cq D� dw� Ym. O� .•p1'•✓ O O ys G y yY ✓� Y �► ZO rs,N :1 � �e t� C2. ` r al�ZI O — yY. m c v Ito _� y— s �i � N -- 00� yy 2.1 g`g YYC y YYY d'r.H _ � Q V�Vl O� p� �aM 6Y6 Gp ROO CC npy iV� pp YY �ys V: J'Lp 'i ti t x 9 Em i Ts Y Y w— 7.• r a�� O jO•t+ C PwN CC C 9 Y � G 52 1s Y r6 c2 0 �r Y ✓ C4 mow.. _ w ■ .YOU.® �r N� Y4 OE pg.9 9C M W 4�,/ QY 4S° ✓1� 9 = e�. f 0o vY IN Y Ytl r 9 `— Or O IL 0o V V Cq w��J•J� Q� �u '' O ys Y!\ a.�� y yY r �► ZO rs,N :1 � �e t� ��0 �$ ®� r al�ZI O — N •1 O N �i � N Fl 'i ti t x 9 Em i Ts Y Y faVY r6 9 0 ! y' t w ■ .YOU.® �= N� y J all sw =w e�. f 0o vY d4 cqcr N� r Q� 9�✓ Y!\ a.�� *v�ippl 6D r ifOM t4 'i ti t x 9 Em L_J DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMIONGA STAFF REPORT November 14, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Bari-,,e R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Ping K% Assistant Engineer ENVIROWIENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13075 - WILLIAM FeRT:4�9 - su v son o arses of land into 2 parcels in Be —ow—Residential District (2.4 dwelling units per acre), located at the west side of Hellman Avenue and south of 19th Stree; (APN:202- 041 -30) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Renue�stedd. Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as skiown on Exhibit "B" B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - .91 acres Parcel 2 - .39 acres Total 1.30 acres C. Existing Zoning: Low Density Residential D. Surrounding Land Use: North - Existing Single Family Residence South - Existing Single Family Residence East - Vacant Best - Existing Single F naily Residence E. Surrounding General Plan and Develo=—at Code Designations: North - Low Density Residential South - Low Density Residential East - Low Density Residential West - Low Density Residential F. Site Characteristics: The eas.erly portion of the site currently has an existing single family ,esidence with the majority of the property being vacant. ITEM 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENT PM 13075 - WILLIAM PERRY ROOFING NOVEMBER 14, 1990 PAGE 2 qP II. ANALYSIS: ti The purpose ;�;. the parcel .a9p is to crqate two 'rots separating the existing single ,faMly residence fres the vacant land. A master plan for furture development of the vacant land is sh,!�Am on Exhibit "C ". Pepperidge Lane has been constructed full width from Hellman Avenue Including the cut; -de -sac except for sidewalk, street trees, drive approaches, and street lights which wills be installed upon development of Parcel 1. The Hellman Avenue improvements will be "nstructed upon recordation of the record map. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The appl Scant completed Part I of the Initial 1 Stuo. MEW ondu—cted a field investigation and completvi Part II of the Initial Study. No ;.dverse impacts upon the enviibnment are anticipated as a ,result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owrners and placed.in the Island Valley icily Bulletin. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recomm¢nded that the Planning Commission consider a l npui' t anielements of the Tentative Parcel Map 13075, If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, ,►, hk Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:PK:jh Attachments: vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Tentative Map (Exhibit "B ") Master Plan (Exhibit "C ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval 4 e 4 ku CL 46 a. t�G I o � hyi r i r s C3j i F+� cz ti RESOLUTION N6. A RESOEXTIOW OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDIT104ALLY APPROVING TENTATIt12 PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13075, LOCATED AT THE WEST SIDE OF HELL€iAN AVENUE AND SOUTH OF 19TH STREET AND MAKING FINDINGS IU SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202- 041 -30 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 1305, submitted by William Perry Roofing, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 2 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 202- 041 -30, located at the west side of Hellman Avenue and south of 19th Str °et; and WHEREAS, on November 14, 1990, the Planning Commission held a dilly advertised public hearing for the above - described aiap. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS SECTION 1: That *h4,foThowing findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the pro ?osed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial enrironme,tal damage or public health pmolems or have adverse affects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: This Ccaaisslon finds and certifies that -he project has been revfeR3_a_n_C considered in compliance wikh the Califore, Environmental Quality Act of 1970; and further, this Cert+Oission hereby issues a- Negate +e Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 13075 is hereby approved subject to EF attached Standard Conditions and to following Special Conditions: 1. An it lieu fee as contribution to the future underarounding of the existing overhead utilities (te` ecoxnunication and electrical) ca the apposite side of Hellman Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final map. Tlie fee shall be or - -half the Ci 4y adopted unit amount times the 1 eric.-*.h of the prof, t frontage. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT PARCEL MAP 13075 - WILLIAM PERRY RO°mra NOVEKEER 14, 1990 PAGE 2 2. A request vacate the excess City storm drainage easemeft a4,iacert on uoth sides of the Beryl - Hellman channel access roads sr 311 be submitted and approved prior to approval of the final reap.. 3. The property within the project boundaries west of the Beryl - Hellman channel access road shall be labe.ed a Lot V. The Developer shall deed Lot "A" to tl. -, adjacent property to the west. 4. All drainage improvement per conceptual grading plan _xhall be installed prior to recordation of the final map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CW Ors RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ar,vy T. FFNiel, Chairman A'7F.ST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission- of the City or Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dal-r and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plan% ng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the K mining Commission held on the 14th day of November, 1990, by the following vote -to -wit:. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: 40ES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COM+MISSIONERS: t 47 F 1 2, P 3 Z s i �Y �Z R o � 0 •Y 22M d 2 itsi ► ' V r a _ i i� f f its2 20 Jj lm ! Iii ,. _Y �, � w • � _'i, - s .f► s3 Ai H3 s A � SAS s � � i • s j2a _ r Y ^ 4 3- Bal W4. Cpl,_ ..v� •_ZZ3 F .► � I Q -� I I I � I � I b _y" oaf « p�3 .'. ��■ 4q � Cq Cd° d. •. C � L�� M F 00 t aV�1 O O p C « \V O�V LN � L 4• uY0` �op N CYQ LpV 1 Gee j!y '3'00 iiE tea I 1 o,� iY � i� � .i'°• �i 41:7 w� �o r � 8a >A� • o�1� -r o72* V a s y� •� o- ° 3 L ITS a lm Q _ %e �� U V ygN '�y.��tj$ `oY� s L,Y Yr ° O.N b g. I rL� ti Nn sL, °° s� a v.. ai' fEe. ��a: j ��a►� �' w.�� .s�'$ wL4av�. yel^ N A y N !V ^ l o Ni 14 Rp DATE: TO: FROM: Br: SUP,JECT: CITY of RANCHO Ctr ".P MONGA STAFF RET IO $T November 14, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Senior Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASCfSSF —ENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIE4 88 -42 — I hINO S. NNE - The pme develont of a medical office totaling 21,300 square feet on 1.26 acres of 13nd in the Office /Professional District, located at Va southeast corner of Base Line. Read and Carnelian Street - APN: 207- 031 -29. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPT401i: A. Action Requested: Approval of the site plan, grading plan, kandscape plan, elevations and issuance of t Negative Decl ara .ion. B. Surrouru i ng Lard Ise g,,nd Zoni na.: North Exi zirrn shopping center; Neighborhood r al D'I.strict South Single family homes; Low Residential District (? -4 dwelling units per acre? East - senior housi-ag, Red Hill Cummunity Park; Office /Professional District and Park West - Existing shoppinji center; Neighborhood Commercial District C. General Plan Designations: _ Project SSite - Ofl- /Prrofessionai District North NeightbrtooS Conr -rcial District South - Lcww Residentia' District East Office /Profe_zo onai and Park West - Neighborhood.Commercis District D. Site Cb—, cteristicc: The site is vacant, padded out and landscr.; d „ith R.;rf.' All ,public improvements aee ir,talled. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 88 -42 - HING S. KWEE NOVEMBER 14, 1950 Page 2 f E. Parking Calculations: Number of k: nber of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use i!cntage nit;a Required Provided Existing Bank 3,500 1/250 14 35 Existing Office 65,472 1/250 252 288 Proposed Medical 23,063 1/209 115 115 Office TOTAL 393 438 I1. ANALYSTS: A. Genera,. The site i': part of an existing master planned offica comdlex. There is an existing bank, Union Federal, to the west and an existing two -story office building to the south. There is agotner vacant pad an Cirnelian with no developmenS proposals. The proposed two -story medical office building consists rf contemporary Mission style. Architectural elements include tower with detailings, arches, stucco trim around windows,- :rulti -paned windows, sufficient vertical variation, and building plane variation. The overall height J Khe building is 40 feet while the hr "' .4 of the main tower° at the north elevation is 48 fe." However, the Development Crde ailows for architectural projections, such as towers, to e.^eed the maximun building height of 40 feet to within 15 feet. Therefore, the building height complies with the Code. S. Design Review Committee: The DLsig:� Review Committee TChitiea, T�o�istoy, Xroutil) originally reviewed the proposed project on April 19, X990. 'ihe Canmtitt- did not recommend_ approval and directed the apolicant to -ork with staff on developing elevations that are consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and the Commission's policies. The apolicant hao revised the site plan and elevations which were submitted to the Design Review Coir;mittee (Chitioa,, folstay, Kroutil) for review again on September 20, 1990. The Committee reviewed t,a ruvir2d elevations and indicated that it had improved substantial) and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. The outdoor plazas at the north and south entrance should be provided with pedestrian amenities such as, but not f Iin.!ted t,, textured pavement, permanent .furniture, . l special ? ;ghting, attractive landscaping, and etc. The design of the hardscape and furniture should be i r. PLANN."AG COmgissrON STAFF REPORT DR 88 -42 - PING S. KWEE NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 3 compatible with the 4iission architectural style. The design of the plaza 'should be subject to City Planner review and approval. 2. Adaitional landscaping shall be provided alc,ig zhe street frontage. This is in addition tic replacing those trees that were taken out due to wind dy °iage or ,back of maintenance since 1979. 3. Additional landscaping should be provided around the building perimeter subject to City Planner review an-* approval. 4. The primary building color should be the off - white stucco color. The proposed darker stucco shade should only be used as a,t accent trim zolor. C. Environmental Assessment:_ Upon review of Part I of the Initial Study and completion of "art II of the Environmental Check List, staff has fouvd no significant adverse impact as a result of this rroposed medical of ice project. If the Commission concurs with staff findings, the isFuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. I1I. FACTS AR FINDINGS: The p.°nposed project is in accordance with the General Plan, the objezt ,ves of the Development Code, and the purposes of the District which the site. is located. The proposed project will not tie detrimental to the public hearth, safety, or welfare or mata. rally injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends apps -oval of Development Revie-, 8842 through the adopt? ^n of the attached- Resolution with conditions and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respec lly submitted, 48ra rer BB:NF:mlg w _;. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 88 -42 » RING S. WE NOVEMBER 14, 5990 Page 4 v Attachments: Exhibit "A "'- Site Utilization Map Exhibit "8" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual. Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscar ,Plan Exhibit "E" w Floor Plans Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations Rcsol'ution of Approval with Conditions AWL fyysfine I'F K- i7�77 fit Jill'. 'kill z 0 z Q 0 z 01 4 `y4 garbs tufA � . riex to ny¢A q•�g i R4. %.b.s Ctln"lt,w4) 11 v71N4 A -4 OM.tlb �� + 4L6 PNlIX 4j S•liJ� t+4Y,.y�- 44 -'_- -- / ^}O.s wt. J(J WJ �► �r + - ,� ` � - S�a wl n!t•. Ate^+ 1i�,orc9�9 2�°.iYB�'4 MlD�G�.6. A3ltt.fl�A4� *w� � b � �B1•m� ! r�S v \ ►!' c•da wu n F TMT N M �S l4N�wi►ro ANA +� ♦ r L:- _�.lS• 1 -�4 - A.1r •�+41L..C. `�"'�"�� p '�iC �'9oW7 ._..•.o Cry OF � r ION t �• ti - VA PMh ,Y �4y4, ' lY s •olt Or w y14yY ��4Y Qpt \� V 1• j w • of .3 •. ...i r. �-ww -4 ... .. ti. •.l. , P �R• et iiZOIPiSPS� 2»"J4CM+i MiCAK.AL •lulll�l►Ic$ k° E PIY. P6MM1 stsy. • Cb,� b.•0) a. p ON T N O as 1 for \ i }I ♦ � f f Y q .�g4 •Y fu�41a6� 9MJcWn�t �; ' ~ � ►��fs•or'sn'a- no.7s 4y �� e�� ^dj ',� 9 P8b gYMfllG , / ♦1 ,4 �� •• �NL• .(� WpL'N• -• .'Q.'a'�• ' IINL. '11 +�i•ry' j � 9•w�Y Of tMf MYG ensue � 7• NAR )IAMVI fi�sRbSeD 2r -�t'.4 MRS7�rJi. '�°111L.alli4 I 1 • , ( • STAR �!'JiMlr.s q • 6.6T M •.B wN l Lrf~ ••f.Y M fM{ WL'S • t�4 r r v �. •4AJt �OM.IIi L C" UCAMOINGA Mk- OF k�� TrrLE: rdrort-w- ....; E3SfiIBCf: SCALE: 7 •' 1..?ra w ^mss � . `��. _ Io 1 \ Jr f w .w.� yYYI 'a b w " at -I ( �-1 rp I ! I I I I I f y.R�p' I ir.�_ - _ •- . %� •• �NL• .(� WpL'N• -• .'Q.'a'�• ' IINL. '11 +�i•ry' j � 9•w�Y Of tMf MYG ensue � 7• NAR )IAMVI fi�sRbSeD 2r -�t'.4 MRS7�rJi. '�°111L.alli4 I 1 • , ( • STAR �!'JiMlr.s q • 6.6T M •.B wN l Lrf~ ••f.Y M fM{ WL'S • t�4 r r v �. •4AJt �OM.IIi L C" UCAMOINGA Mk- OF k�� TrrLE: rdrort-w- ....; E3SfiIBCf: SCALE: rd i� < 0 i OZ z Q 0 A 9z Q Tt ty I Oil wy iri Tt ty I Oil wy KI U n i 8 �3 4 I� W � � U d c© :s2 �J1Tt Q M�Ir t 0 l' i P"-p IT, I IA t�1il . C IIA-4 ?, )a .rig A. Em 01 I RSSOLUTION NO. JMk El A RESOLUTION OF ITE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 0-42 FOR A MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 21,300 SQUARE FEET ON 1.25 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE SC',R:S£AST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND CARNELIP1 STREET !.' THE OFFICE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING r'!,RDINGS, IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 2307- 031 -29 A. Recitals. (i) iHing S. Kwee has filed an application for the approval of ?.evelopment Review No. 88 -42 as described in the titli: of this Resolutio«. "�reinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is refereed to as "the application." III) On the 14th of November, 1990, the Planning Comrtissioii of the City of nancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legsl prerequisites prior to the adcption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. Mi. THEREFOkE, it t: hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Ranchc Curamorg•$ as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specificall finds that all of the facts set forth in t:p Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Ba_ed ., n substantial evidence ,. dsei,ted to this Commission during the aLove -v _< nced meeting on November 14, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to a satellite pad within a master planned office cownlex, - ncated at the southeast corner of Base Line road and Carnelian Street 0th a :street frontage of 181.91 feet and lot Aepth of apps:ximately 200 fry c. =rtd is presently improved with a bank and a two -story office building; and (b) 1.,,t property to the north of the subject si.:b is an existing shopping ct•4er, the property to the south o' is existing single family hones, the property to the east is asp existing senior apartme -rt cora','C-x ani 4 community park, and the property td the west is a shopping cafitAr. C� O _ . -- - -- during ehe above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code -and the purposes of the distri. '- in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is i'n compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) Than the_ proposed use,, together - with the conditions applicable thereto, will not .be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to propp.'ties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental y-- Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Goumission he-o,6y issues a negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard' Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: i 1. The outdoor plaza at the north and south entrance shall be provided with amenities such as, but not limited, textured pavement, permanent furniture, special lighting, attractive landscaping, etc. The design of the. hardscape and furniture shall be - compatible with the Fission architectural style. The design of the plaza shall be i subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building "permits: 2. Additional landscaping ;shall be provided along the street frontage to the satisfaction of the City Planner.`. PLAIN1NG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OR 88 -42 - HING S, KWEF NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 3 4. Additional landscaping shall be provided around the building perimeter subject to City Planner review and approval ,prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The primary building color shall be the off -white stucco color. The proposed stucco shade 'shall only be used as an accent trim color. 6. The landscape plan shall comply with the City's Xeriscape Ordnance. 7. The existing Uniform Sign Program for the Exchange complex shall be modified to'' address the sign needs of this building prior to issuance df building permits. " Engineering Division: 1. Any new fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing ,overhead' utilities. (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Base Line Road shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits.' The fee shall be one -half of the City adopted unit amount: times the length of the project site. (Parcel 3_of Parcel Map 4869.) 2. Base Lire Road shall be restripped to provide, right -$urn lanes fer east and west bound traffic movements as recommendi�d by the approved Traffic Impact Study, if it is shown that such res.tripping is feasible by plans prepared by the Developer's,` engineer. The restripping may require reconstruction of the Signal, loops as determined necessary by the City Engineer.. 3. The existing 30 -foot wide drive approach located west 70f the project on Base line Road shall be widened to 35 feet at the right-of-way line to Standard Drawing No 306. 4. An easement for joint use of the driveway on Base Line Road and Carnelian Street and reciprocal parking shall be obtained and submitted to the City for approval,` prior to issuance of building permits. S. Landscaping along Base Line Road shall conform to the City's Base Line Road Beautification Master Plan. Building and Safety Division's 1. All openings shall comply with property line clearances. PLANKING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 69 88 -42 - HING S. KWEE NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Page 4 ti 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify . to the adoption of this Resolvtionr APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By, Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commiss:on.of the City of Rancho.., Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly, and regularly introduced, passed, and. adopted by the Planning Commission of the � City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mee #ing of.the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of November, 1990, by the fallowing vote -to -wit: AK 1 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: \/+ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: ,i i i f ki I El NQ rp q e d q M Y T� A w Y yg b'S 4q. i9! p.4 mE i YEA M c gyN, �7�^ ,Egj.�y7y 9YM.Q �RIY �m�uu�T971n `pis Y Y K 6 4 Za4ga ; At wC SA is 4 A • .g7[gg qb f� N " pp `i: ii p�y»�qq 1Pj A Oa 6N ■s ^� MA Vat' ^g Yd �yy _M4V qIF Y�M. +. Y +g Cr y� YY`` d yyy 31.8 Ry y� go iu n 0.t ^• q tIiC AC o ^9 gQGI� 8 w 1ti � e 1 p d W r ri � w w N Y T M CA ydy C �E w rc �� I nM w w o bM�« O pCF V r �pyY TL yTO C�g9 J go- d Y 6 `��r L YgryO i. r N�C� «4 aupy _ YG d q sr �x a and r� d IMaa� •'1� _. . a I W C q Q O p 9 Y Op C all " Nom. • ^r ggg xf q sr �x a and r� d IMaa� •'1� ^mill pffi$�`Y�� SIC YN s erg Tp�NL 3-- giI= ►�� JOa Y�SY�a C.w �. RN LC^W$y +may 9Y•ys�Y ocy ft =. S.°Y- HUMANS ��C b� u$p .� .�+• r ti C Y � � O b a ` 0� 'e ^ u Z' j of a dr ' ♦+ w N S tl O yy � OI M4 q qq�• Y OI �.p^ M3 StN ah � 5.6% tl � Vs e Ell g r I V Cv0 aO6 11 LYt+i L._ 6i as w..N H6 so 40 bqv Is, till ;I Ix t "I I W IM 411111 4 rye _ WE vs 5 r ± ays � 51 $I -d I ��:yyy * x= 69 Hi a y °L Jj NIY� as IP v wTby Sis tlY ego g tl g`$ ix$ rw�♦ S5 �V�.g � L6iG. NI{ MIf 'f lfl 1 1 arBS��seYw biag u"BUt CC CC � g Wa y o a g 4. E w C tl E OW pis _C gr O $.gam da �ytl�,pa t � @ E¢C L :1♦:N CY ^.l N CN '�p tea. Say— �`�i' NY C B y Y� b Y� RL � �> V■ �"p N L 4 tl e N $gey��Qa�i -. $ w .si gs� ^� !vital c if n.g. 055 fix N5 p° w `��'�ia°.�w °j 1 evS4s '�"ooa• ^ a MY Na ' tl O Y V y.. •. M tl.M Mw P. ♦ L jig, �sp} my 'a �p a r» o♦• 5 Y q u pe CC� C Rgl Y•_�a9 �yat9 �y01ve y "40Y.^4 �q]yy'CS O � yaWa_Y.vL ). ^y$�yf ap9 Nq •.au. O�°Y L�` aY VyyG YVyV � �Y PL yS ��g�y W C� �{a��I�{yVyy�N sYYAY�4 •RaMa N, > ®. 'iliY �5,4J$Y 4.��^ �$,r NCr rr p,a�.t LA o. ` + NtNyp ++ x L� 9S 5E0.6OLYMY )3OJ+ g LINEN J�4�M' • 'i• C. yYN 4N yw• 'boy �^ A. R 2_ ^ -S l ^gpy 4 Wb +0oM A�- �Q��•• mS� ` "—is . G° •wee 196 ...�.�.. Y..��gL.c. °, ®�,w =± 9gNY .• +�.w a{�C) paOB L = G •�N° » NM6 O G Cp �� . qS 12 q _2 L U.Y.-I n °•'' .. � qq S 7 'e NIse is e y Y O w J1 Y r Pf' M N = L i tl M b y M Y N � M Y 9 LQ .. 5 "Y � • qE LC IO a4a GY•{ CV N•uq C9Ly'NL MC b '.~Cyy be `EE: °G ~ I °N SN4 J +Y Yw9�w j�L~ B6C� ^`G Y =Y `�N �■ CMs4 ~3� �L LL9Y C °HOC. q6 OMy'..6 pN•G� YYs N ° QC N� H ME= yy .�O!! S,. !1. Y� ' N =' "° (�{ F N�N9N G w t 3'N` /�~C <N.Y��61A l�.9N rL •C•.g N6 C€u dBLOM I I I I i I I I I L°LY 'Ex Cyc G 4 d OO yyC 'C■ C- >CYG •Y nN }te�e w .,13 °'t 'Is qC C6 N a9 C~N1 L�^ ` � -a9 Q O .� Nom{•^ •$ qSB �X Q�Q. M�C� VYpp/.^ sag 1q�J `Qr`/' qN yN.N� Y` N'BQ Y!'4C. 9.N ^,vy•��g �° ]1 V, ps V•' ��5 �• 14 w$'9 •��g V•�iK r. N OQOe Y«C$CNlit.2 °` Bsi c N 4 Y Y. 3 '• N •. N MW L� O Y�_N C •�MQ) °o• c�� gP ae7 e7 °e & ^u�' 3LL� ° 'gY S «e's °44Ol! ° L_L01 � _ce M' C =0e °" Q Nwe� °Nw.6 9 ` = f tz 11 Utz z 5 sr �'CgY.a o�1� QzI^ a a- . . r may» °oar <$P.$ s�:a'l a :tow 1=Gw acia avL 4- F"' = ssI 14Z P_ 932-1 o '�Ic W li \W'•` ��4 �gY(.R 1L. }L�� aye � ��°i �, �__�' ddppgY�6� _Y 1°L`� `%a 'S 72 � =OY� S+Nw o�-yM YY� ^g yY bo a 4 C 0 +`S`p ZVI Y YO' Yp� S1iCM 1U-- ; M'.d0pC� w�VYC� vc ��n C WA CU S. -Q sSNyti i$. Y Z tl+ e 4 R -A Mils H��'fA �Sr � °� °e YN'La3 W�W a•E$ppa �,�'� "a`C +3l �p Ho u ✓C^ YV7� V��p�v Yp m wdV ^ N Y 4 g¢yyY ZiaY' $ u rr NC + CYV NGtBO�1 �LL °O.O Nmb C q �� 'LwN..C.ii p ,D.'® .. I y 4 4 = Op C C• C� �i V. �1N Y q SLY M �Y Y pl Le Tj 5 Wt IL geOC • s`ia �y � �5 L � 4p C^ W-1 sue$ all! o q if �C Q1►O CY N1L L> �4.N y� -p¢N p C '} A N �• a_ iw� p a L 0. qYY�i �5�� yj 6 o��g W ss' _ IyRSQ» $n; I lit is 3 VAYaO � 6j g UK fir^ Hs. Zia '.As L 9.L � �+ M y N wi El f S;3 3 figuli i 'b a o s 2S sS$ a; zz Z.;iq .age! } X 3 q.X 6LO F NYY s q O«GGFGG LY � sY 7� r r L� Y Y V �� 0. ■ Y Y. y y. q' � O � M C C 42 ° m o Q C 4 5 G v C N M a3 r O ^C 4 � 4 C bC : 2 M• q OI•� y� qOr y t O L L Czvs O� YB GEb O 00 CC•. C y wA'M .,� :a ��u Louvo�� c u3y°syMp�j O Y G C OO�W U i z.r $ x> i eo � �qY r Lr +40�N!'O 9tl^i iC�. +COY pP ry' LYLV 'j e 1E YO,�C� YC ^YC g a-3 �V• QD O(MO `B 6y N R. b q Y S bra �' y Q � `oI 3 qIs b Y ^O 2 s`�`iiu uGg TL r as j Y3.5 Ila ^ _I �y�Y rag, E` � V 4 •t. $. $ q EG C vi f Kj C w•AIN f� SIR=. +1 �a Y. g�1. •� ! M6� �! Y www ®pg V ■C ^b q� w L Yp Y NO �Q Y p� a• YY� MVy A ~ A a is L •l i i ae��y Mal O WNV x40 WYLI q B NI wS `` Val t0�07 NN 4' �z � ppyy b'.Gr YO O'�fu gII u_� i z.r $ x> i eo � �qY r Lr +40�N!'O 9tl^i iC�. +COY pP ry' LYLV 'j e 1E YO,�C� YC ^YC g a-3 �V• QD O(MO `B 6y N R. b q Y S bra � ��s:i p2 Y y p� �pp {��.® Md� DSO®s. qIs b Y ^O b s`�`iiu uGg q •y pp yYu pywy O� x •: C' all Mo a e3 Y�p� S'� 5' �. K,C. arA Y,Mp N.- c�. C _Y tl fir. r l� a 5. 'hi Y "g$ 'w'ra oil T YYC.s Nom., TMV� MCJJL LO f0 ay 14. yTS YI rpm. 'sew c Ly .� «qY A f- Ell SIR ar 'u$\a to boo.. �o vw%�s {� r c $.�4ya +a°. Op pp .yc m4 OG Y !M� iz CC4 r y�F Y 43 ^C "p ."N.Y0 YY. A +Y 01 N.. LM �� y y wYq�f g QY O Mg yi L 'v u`d c! ��i. �fH.uW rtaw i i I 1 >s� �! c N4 �n rt I y I I Q 1 S i no %d —0 Nf Is ar � 9 W 21 1] pp t'! Ur LYy k1 RE w 1 i f X-; U`g 4 4 � y S2 •I� p sit Z 9'' "~ 1 a',$- � �« ��j$ us PN�Y M c g QQ L c 3 a ..t4 YaP r� Ls dY r p L Y T• I= �N �� CO N+' 4. EMS s$ 4 a pq� O �lY'qp � No= � p�y rT•- r yS.�.. �lO j[Y� M p�w oW N Wfj IJ1. Y J •T N wl i no %d —0 Nf Is G.p+.A.oa TtiY�a� G1.1 AS t'! Ur ego k1 RE w 1 i f X-; U`g r'Sco �y{ +z :p°T S2 � $ sit Z 9'' "~ 1 a',$- L all ��j$ us PN�Y M 'C _a g QQ L ..t4 YaP yaa N+' 4. M A' •r A y � a'S r' �lY'qp � .Y. e L�p �0� r.., byy=yy C V� &SU yyryy¢ �pT•"a NOW O^ �`. of Q M p�w oW m. 0 I O +uO« • «Ca ^ �ILV4g I.�V� ■ �Y pNYpC N C K i V • YYO. q. DO� dY CV a Y+ 000411 •yf2' Y O ; O-z r O y Y E3 Z. ! q ag 31- If pY qot� 'w. qyY Mao ? g 7 YB.— >CC1 sa Q.: L. I�TLY�4Y• � L L�• � p Ask SI F 1~i1Y $� QW °C 1C9 N �N•qi� Iii eY�- Y � o i uYy �Eo °mss YdN aJaV MO M » e �� SEr O1 qqYY 3=W _ STE 13= Ov�a� yy$C wil v� w+I. 1 r L� o :S ^ �p N � ~ �n, Ul ,111 G L O Y�� a10 e�;y. O N C\ Y p � C L o C LPL G`Y ^ m O ,2 CWY y O t 1 ■q �1'i. ^Nw L OY9°. Yr ■ CC6�YyJ K�O CpNttY ZOY 0 I O +uO« • «Ca ^ �ILV4g I.�V� ■ �Y pNYpC N C K i V • YYO. q. DO� dY CV a Y+ 000411 •yf2' Y O ; O-z r O y Y E3 Z. ! q ag 31- If pY qot� 'w. qyY Mao ? g 7 YB.— >CC1 sa Q.: L. I�TLY�4Y• � L L�• � p Ask SI F 1~i1Y $� QW °C 1C9 N �N•qi� Iii eY�- Y � o i uYy �Eo °mss YdN aJaV MO M » e �� SEr O1 qqYY 3=W _ STE 13= Ov�a� yy$C wil v� w+I. 1 r