Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1991/02/27 - Agenda Packet
w CD N kn f J Y k F y l CITY OF . RANCHO CUCAMONGA z AGENDA, > - 1977 l WEDNESDAY FEBRUA'RY 27, '1991 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTVA COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I'. Pledge of Allegiance XI. Roll Call Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Tols,:�y Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Vallette I Commissioner Mel''her t- III. Announcements IV. Approval of Minutes Adjourned Meeting--if February`7, 1991 V. Consent Calendar The fallowing Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any .tem, it should be removed for discussion. A. .TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13759 - DESARCH DESIGN GROUP` - A residential subdivision of 55 single faluily 'lots on 14.01 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling, units per acre) located on the west side �,f Haven Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad APN: 1076-301-17. (Continued from February 13, 1991.) w VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which' concr_rned individuals may voice their opinion of the 'related, project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the:.... Commission by stating your name and address. A11 such opinions shall be limited to 5 i Anirtes per individuate.' fr?r each project. Please sign in after speaking. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERA'... PLAN HOUSI,VG ELEMENT REVISION 90-03A -_CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - In accordance with Article 10.6, Section 65588 of the California Government Code, a revision and update to the, City Housing Element has been prepared. The changers to the document include. an update of the Technical Appendix consisting of documentation and analysis of current demographic trends, statistical information and 1 housing assistance. needs; update and ,revisions to the City's'hous,'. objectives and policies; and development oft five year action program designed to implement the City's overall housing goal. In addition, staff recommends j; issuance of a Negative Declaration. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-44 WEST COAST PERFORMING ARTS The I request to establish a dance and vocal training < school in a leased space of"5,988 square feet within an existing commercial center on 10.5 acres of land in the Specialty Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 7965 vineyard Avenue, F8-F13 APN: 208-101-10 Staff recommends issuance of a-'Negative Declaration. D, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE ! PERMIT 91-02 - DbE DEE'S DANCE STUDIO - The request to establish a dance studio in a leased space of 2.700 square feet within an existing, industrial park in the General industrial District (Subarea-3) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at 9467 9th Street, Suite 5 - APN: 209-U32-24. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. ,1 t VII. " Director's,Reports E.' MULTIPLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AMi�.IDMENTS Discussion of recent C-ty Council direction regardinq� the future development of" multiple gamily residential. projects,. Staff, wi11 present scheduling_ and program proposals to inpleftent the Council's poll cy;direction. ` VIII. commist'lon Business _ J I8. Public r,imment3 i This is the time and place for the general public to_address the Commission., Items to be discussed here are those which do not already a^pear on thin agenda. F. 4ESS HARRIS CARYN COMPANY Z. Adjournment The Planiting Commission has ad'j'y?ted Administrative Rsy°3ations that see an 11t01 P.M. adjournment= time. If items go beyond that//time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. ! f T I tdo NILN T*Y'r amm A P' ........... ... j - i..d . .-.. ,. 1. .. COLL" AIM e ;j, � to JJ O — un z -aww- Ir ------- itz- i( C Cano+rwa. a f7 rr a e� isi77 I a ! OLIYi1!! 74f8l�D�f7PYe�..nppary/. : f Cr" OF RANCHO CUCAIAOWA S residents o-�- MOY)te V I Sta Str-eel- i r\ A & Lorna, w-e- 010ject -rD 4h�e destruction o-� -lh� �.ucd 1 y�t`�u -h�ee,s cl i re c�-l� beh i►�1 Oor proper-ties ' s��ne-tv�e addtr�ss 2 � l.o` 0-7 Ma n+f- J} CA -;ej Lcrr,na P 2 c U37 te�q�f� _ 10356 A-94-LowtrA, 9 -Za42. 7 7- 6 cl E �Z h Cc. .Cr- 1czjcfr yncv—rr l„s i A CIT"f OF RANCHO'CUCAMONGA STAFF R.EPOR, DATE: February 27, 1991 4• TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13759 - DESARCN DESIGN residential subdivision of 56 smg a ami y lots on 1 .01 acres of land in the Low Residential" District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Haven Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific. Railroad - APN; 1076-301-17., (Continued from February 13, 1991.) I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13759 was originally approved by the Planning-omission on January P7, 1988, to expire on January 27, 1990. A one-year time extension was granted extending the map untii January 27, 1991. The applicant fs currently requesting a one-year time extension to expire: on January 27, 1992. Provisions ^' of the Development Code allow for tentative tract time extensions i in twelve-month increments, not to exceed five years from the original date of approval. II. ANALYSE; Staff reviewed the proposed time extension and compared the proposal with development criteria outlined in the Development Code. Based upon this review, staff determined the project meets the basic development standards of the Low Residential District. On June 27, 1990, the Planning Cornaission reviewed and approved the Design Review for Tentative Tract 13759. At that meeting, adjacent residents voiced Gpposition to the proposed tree removal previously approved with the tentative tract map. Following the Commission meeting, staff met with adjacent residents and the applicant to address concerns pertaining to potential tree preservation. The applicant indicated a study would be prepared to identify whether or not any trees could be preserved based upon the trees location, condition, and proximity to proposed grading improvements. I On February 12, 1991, staff met with the applicant and residents to once again review the tree preservation matter and the possibility of selective preservation. No new information was presented to staff at the time of the meeting. As of this writing, the applicant and project arborist are in the process of i j I ITEM A i 41 , PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TE FOR TT 13759 - DESARCH' DESIGN GROUP February 27, 1991..._ Page 2 reevaluating the condition of several trees and the possibility of their preservation. Staff`iiil present an oral report on the outcome of the tree preservation issue at the Pl-nning Commission j' meeting. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following findings in or er to approve this application: A. There have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, Development Code, or character of the area within which the project is located, that would cause the, approved project to become inc�Jnsistent or non-conforming. B. The granting of an extension will not be detrimental to the !( public health, safety or welfare,or materially injurious to properties Or improvements in the vicinity. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff tillT.present am oral report at the Panning ommission meeTing. Following the oral report and discussion, the t; Planning Commission should' give staff appropriate direction 'to prepare either a Resolution of Approval or Denial for adoption on t(e next Consent Calendar. Resp ily sub ed, Bra ter City Tanner BB:TG/jfS Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit"C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Resolution No. 88-20 'Exhibit "E" - Resolution No. 90-21 1p kA ®m mew W� ®� I J.F. ®aviails®n Associates, Inc.' W= = ENGINEERING'. PLANNING SURVEYANG :ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE December 13,1990 Project No.;87-09965 Cfr,"!= ANC U— H>i GU ^� Mr.Brad Buller,City Planner clTv OF RANCHO CUCAMONGADEC 91990 Planning Division AN P.®.Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga,California 91729' RE: EXTENSION OF TRACT 13759 t,j Dear Mi.Buller: On behalf of our client,Fu Mal Umited Partnership,we 66reby request t,` approval of Tract 13759 be extended one year past The.c irrent expiration date of January 27,_ )1. T 'a filing fee of$126.00 is enclosed. This tract is in a position to record,pending completion of_irnprovement agreernerus and payment of any required fees or deposits by Fu Mal Limited Partnership. They are cur-enfly working l ` towards this and,but will require an additional*10-60 days to complete financlas-arrangsmsnts. We are,therefore,requesting a one-year extonsioOl!intii January 21,1992. Thank you for your consideration In this matter. If you have anyque4dons,or require additional Information,please call me at(714)686-08",Ext.1 3. Very truly yours, J.F.DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES,INC. DonJ.Edison Project Manager I DJE yb let-ef8 Corporate Headquarters•3880 Lemon Street,Suite 300-P.O.Box 493•Riverside,CA 92502.714/686.0844•FAX 7 41686.5954 A- 3 x 1 1 " I 1 em i � ® t so 400 rr tr r. •�R. �a K. . t 0 a k ©� @ m Is, Wt 31 a ®° Ask t )r 0 S a ® y v ------------ @ @ a As ' adpaON @ M 0 • � ` y tCr I g e0 a on a S � t o �j�--►it►EM�4 a = 0 ri0 C41 n Q r Ar n, 1 t A, 4 �Q4. 1 or 'fit �_ .� -'`�� `l'."" .� •. � r II •'� rs ttt "'t t t � tS !. i r. _..tit'""' t..a 'L7 t •..R�••+''•• N•'Y'^.....a�l�,r...te,�. t�k`,. ! �t • ..1.y�!'t. .t.l. 1� r ••� fI! �� y �1 d J 7 t C:..I aii ta•.v ltCti�' �r L` 66 +T+`,' 1 1 n !J1 eiarl��-aewoeMt.gto _ '-..► ^+r•' RLTA ,Yl*TA t1CHN ,r. gia_• = t" p Q tt�r�O 'r t 861 s t t�•� rr t t t s �"r[t rq�l; t t � I!t�! -;f, (.• �t CITE' OF RANafo,-CUCAmoNGA PLANNING DT4II�IOId �Y'LE: �Ji2 .) -,; �� �('� .�• "o4rTr .ark ,,__ � . _ _�'u. .!f .�� � G .1 i R � � ti i 1 1 iIi J 1� 1— � ••IYI[i Lf 7: �l� 'r-•ire• w�I, .wsi JS� _.r �rF s�'.ti.'• ,� ri.a / rrer am y40 jo IL y b + ;y J �. - root rr.�rr� •."►�a..•. A �. jn sLv ,:wza fae LI*. WM PARK CITY of RANCHO.,CUCAMoNGA n ( - PLA14NINC; DIMION era e el N LE;�wrn L2 SCALE RESOLUTION NO. 88-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13759, LOCATED 'TEST OF HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT APN 202-201-53 A. Recitals. (1) The Des Arch Design Group has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13759 as described 'in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 27th_ of ,January, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the, application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Co►irtission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 27, 1988, inc:u,ing written and aral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the west side of Haven Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad with a street frontage of 494 feet adjacent to Haven Avenue and lot depth of 1269 feet; (b) The property to the north of the subject site is Low Residential, the property to the south of that site consists of Low-Medium Residential, the property to the east is Low Residential, and the property to the west is Low Residential. (c) Toe applicant has filed an accocpanying Tree Removal Permit for the Foposed removal of three (3) windrows from the subject 1 property based upon arborical survey and grading impacts. (d) A geologic report has been prepared, consistent with the provisions of the Alquist-Priolo Act and certified by the Ci'ty's Geologic Consultant, indicating that evidence of a near surface, active fault line was not encounte,ed on the site. l � PLANNING`COMMIS-SION RESOLUTION NO. 88-20 TT 13759 DES ARCH DESIGN GROUP January--27, 1988 Page 2 (e) A preliminary acoustical study has been prepared in accord with the provisions of the Noise Element indicating that a minimum seven (7) foot high barrier is required adjacent to Haven Avenue. '" (f) The proposed subdivision design has minimum and average lot sizes of 7,210 and 8,268 respectively which are consistent with the requirements for the district in which it is located. (g) The proposed subdivision design and accompanying maps have. been reviewed by the (416dirg, Technical and Design Review Committees and approved subject to the conditions contained within this Resolution. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; and Ankh (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental r Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 snd 3 above, this >Commission hereby denies the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated hetein by this `reference. PLA14NING COMISSION RESOLUTION No. 88-20 TT 13759 - DES ARCH DESIGN GROUP January 27, 1988 Page 3 Planning Tentative Tract (11 The rear yard slopes of the lots on t46 north side of La 'Vine (33-35, 42-53) shall be reduced to the extent possible, in order to provide larger usable rear,yard areas, by lowering the pads of 'the lots to the immediate north. (2) Bank protection shall be required adjacent to Haven Avenue. Design of the bank and wall shall be subject a Planning and Engineering review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. - (3) A sound barrier, which shall be a minimum of 7 feet in height above street centerline -grade, is required. adjacent to Haven Avenue and shall wrap around Lot 1 to the north and Lots 6 and 7 to the south. The barrier may be constructed with a combination of earthen berm and decorative block wall. (C` Due to development requirements and poor health of the trees, the existing windrows ,on the site should be removed and replaced subject to the following: a. The windrow adjacent to Haven Avenue shall replaced pursuant to the ,City's Tree Preservation Ordinance #276 with Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) which shal7.be a minimum of 15 gallon in size and spaced 8 feet on center. b. To the interior of tfie tract, a more intensive landscape treatment, which is to include additional tree plantings, shall be provided in areas with required planting (such as slope areas and along interior s*reet public rights- of-way). (5) A.final acoustical study shall be prep:,'red for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. (6) Parkway improvements on Haven Avenue shall conform to the findings of the City's Haven Parkwz: Beautification Study. (7) An in-lieu fee, as contribution to the constrs.ztion of the median island within Haven Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to "building permit issuance or recordation of the final map, whicheEer occurs first. The amount A the fee shall be $57.00 per �� �� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTON NO. 88-20' iT 13759 - DES ARCH DESIGN GROUP January 27, 1988 :Page 4 Alk linear foot of property fronting onto Haven Avenue (t496 feet). (8) An in-lieu fee, as contribution to the future undergroundinc of the existing overhead utilities (electrical and telecommunications) on the opposite side of Haven Avenue, shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final map. The fen shall be one- half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the north project boundary to the southernmost terminus pole. (9) The existing concrete channel (1 foot deep) north. of the north property line, extending from Mesuda Street to Haven Avenue, shall be removed. (10) Pad 6'evat ins for lots within,the flood hazard irea (Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and b) shall be a minimum of one (1) foot above the base flood elevation; as determined by the final drainage study, (11) Construct City Master Plan storm drain improvements as f determined by the final drainage study approved by toe i City Engineer. These may include one Or more of the following: a. A Master Plan Storm Drain No. and/or; b. Additional facility beneatt_ `kern Pacific Railroad tracks,; to paralr..., xisting box culvert. Standard drainage fees for the site will "e credited to the cost of constructing Master Plan facilities and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement costs in excess of those fees in accordance with City Ordinance No. 75. (12) Approval shall be obtained from, and a railroad license granted by, Southern Pacific Railroad prior to construction of storm doRinage improvements within the right-of-way. De:,ign Review (i A h1pck or masonry wall shall be erected along the storth n-^perty line wherever an existing fence is of a matap other than masonry or block (such as wood or tnai. ) or is not adjacent to the property line. The applicant shall work with adjacent property owners 1w resolve any double wall situation . prior to the issuai..a of building p rmits. ►i�—, 4� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-20 TT 13759 - DES ARCH DESIGN GROUP January 27, 1988 Page 5 f (2) A decorative block wall treatment shall be_provided li along the southern boundary odjacent to thr Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way. The decorative treatment shall include the use of a darker colored textured block for the lower retaining portion with a lighter decorative block on top, which is consistert i' with the wall along Haven Avenue. In addition, climbing vines shall be plaW4 ilong the southf ace of the wall. (3) Drought tolerant, low mci,ntenance plant mi terial III including vines, and a suitable low maintenance irrigation system shall be installed within the Scuthrrn Pacific Railroad right-of-way adjacent to the proposed wall for a distance of 100 feet, subject Ito the approval of the Southern Pacific Railroad. (4) The barrier -11 and landscape treatment used along � j Haven Aven shall be consistent with the City's beautifica'r , .n for the Haven Avenue corridor. Landscape rrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved, ,oy a Planning and Engineering Divisions prior " the issuance of building permits. (5) A drip irrigation system shall be utilized for -trees L on any slope areas in addition to normal groundcover irrigationi techi.iques. (6) All dwellings shall have rear and side. elevations upgraded witft additional detailinq representing 360 degree architecture. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Co=ission shall certify to the adoption of this Reso-lutior APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS-27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1988. PLANNING ISSION OF THE'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA e BY: �T Mc arry . e , a�roman ATTEST: � � --Frld Buller, Deputy Secretary II, City I, Brad Buller„ Deputy Secretary of the Planning Co�mu the of e C y of Rar.•ho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coninission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of January, 1988, by the foilcvaing vote-to-wit: ` 14 ,11 (�.. PLANNINGCOMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-20 TT 13759 DES ARCi,� CEaIGN GROUP January 27 1988 Page b AYES, v;IMKISSIOHERS: CHIT?EA, EMiERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY III r II at It 'fl(p _ �YY�p�.� OLb bps +Oa 'Q �N+�•.�. �'�O. 9C�u.Cn tl N_1YY«�� y `y• C y h �e N.�� G^fJ6 6 .�1 L. � .a1pC • ��.Vb ``eegY rr V•r O.N ` O - 0 Y6 �W y ,wv ■Ns �gb CV � �� �$ obp�.. y4�j�b 6 ��N VppY 'O.� fl*.fD Ve'I ua �0 >®.e YyyLp ��� �= ®Crti� ask —`. �Nr� +PHA ~� flYSPg W'ae 3iigG� ®oN.GYw 11 Ilk ��ryi jq 200 u I_raMgMV�3 Yz as pyV:V olcrsY�,. O� ��pk v`.~.V•1 r�'w Inga MMMMMM X v am ix yj m ,4 A , 9 e: ISPUR s (,^.SPUR" - y yi, d AP gV 'OMO N fir- CA �e pb Of oMalen 9�gQj�p '" .. N -�I �a a �' a �a �ot.0.4— �� � 6- YVr$j Cq^6� L YY Ef�I L<.�LYG� aCY �®Yi0 SU c�Y3 �c 9io� �� ;s� �a v. $a o v vop�g a• A •�. OmwEll jX53y�Y�Y y�P� `p:� = w a- v^'�p r�� a =',,,del Q j e c t-' io N -i.NH y �. r m� g ;- C v asi uo � ill gag! 5 s S W— A-Si, wY�t Y �3iMa`Tg 03 KsLz 4N ix m P = y S rl►_ Ycy 6� S.-If YaOn1 OprrY{� ;.. F$iF,,RR yN1 qq �w• _wa �wP g _pIY� bb O $4'® al�Y pQ_�� cq v6 C®¢q��.g�,/e�.it�s LP 60®.OL y.C�. ¢6�6 p'eEMYi1Y �itwa LpW� p 6O0.pprf of � H d L _ �c g yg p .�. w we , I V N I�i pdMR M 'O Eg�� 4s its T i! •`'M` O�YL fat Z g� 4�ey� aqY' 3g p� a6v'wm pp Us G w•0 _sy ®C1f Y^ iYt ai p�3M $ Y �.R�aMp� `+ _OY ax.^Aip Ga - �.'¢' Tj wOwp O splSa j H� j Wa j... '4) ®LI1p Fr=Sii. 1. $�^q-! �s� f g_q ILS _fff `0¢�bM�N�. veS>�• �. `� ±yS Y. e .i^ p�f Zs.11 �Y■ Oeg_� p _c p gi ®g �q�$ Y� � --O R. C� �I�i O. $s -mis yd e_ O m' i1 {� b 0 O p s b� o r — p VI c p p I, wA Y e o o VC w q® u p A u b- �a�SSSSSS�Ti gg`"g }y�y� Y 'w 7yy Q' sBvS RN .w.oNppa,n .N. YsYCop 327; P ML v C Mg 6 � � .. J64O iH `�, $ `a x o f Y M it pM�l y \S GL lip, r`� �LayY dta bQ NN. « a �.� —g�J Y:.s 20 C 90 O Qw a `off �o � ygµN ; BLb$e rs gye�a'«$ � S117V3 • ^b.N294 �YLu 4 ag�$V �b = i ti« a$ gra_or YD LM a � s y tp Y Oy�NY yyp ® y # a Q{ I m$ $ya a s^' wN$� it SZ-2 $a F�ppppottt i YS S W.gg MC 0'QI}a�s, gppwc y�:. a�O C C 6- 1 _L . 0 -d�Q$$0$ O1Y G rCYf r0` 104 g N _X q'po y®® } -.t �r�Y IO� pYy N V• 9~L a �ptl ..S r6 06 AN z arO L N A L mbMY S/ri. NNAB LMC.�� �-N— Y Sk Y dA°6 Y M Y� O qp byL� M L CCC Y b Y l b 7 N p�yLy �_yyy _GC+..yCb NYyY�Y�I ,ab�YL p{L�f�Y�,,I®wpF rMrr. eMM /W �N 4 +Y .gCL�L �Lq r+ qG y �ci O'er •A�M6 N. eM� ?.wMOs SWO SS1�M8NNa tb+✓r s.MNY..it a'm�.1ppYVVia 4� 1LO Caw xi 1 I 11 ^( M na za « $s $t g _ w r_.D F ae` w2g+ 8 �QVF 2 er_9 N.+gY 4 yy q O b L `Te' y - D b 4 M G TL '':. ZZ I.ym a�q LMYSe ®« YO' Y� « a p bu Z« m�+g yjy�»•$»•.� � �$yyyYt^a $.s ri Q®. �ee�pp_�o �W �r`O �rNy$yy�TL �saaaY �¢y . 4 L Y s C V f`4!x■gi �gqLaS. lz j. >r�� i.u.•+. s e��.�Y6 yy w yyV bSy �}S 1 YID �s¢�L ZI ,^• -�CYYNS ~.M•® ` �Oe `'"p Qp+ w=g{ II cz z +yr aCCpp 0.. �i Fzv® V V s LJ CCeK1 CC®•Vat tl y�1 tYI'i.N MM�. ,fe 13—a 1 .• d _ S y yY O Y �.r �. Y b •• twMY <wdSs SON ..FY•Ga li.i RO i0..�..e•� S6 Mi eKMCL O f _ Y � C a• -y1( R W y. i $emseN � .. fie' ..5.,z41i Cr I-etc pp VyCy ■r uA r Ap'L � �tl L „hi L� G Cy v•- •pYw ®� D >� @��m p�•d 'y� �ue� Y L �gj 9 ,yy� A�uo. = 2-. o� v uN :Syz E "e$•• a 21 ar N:a C �y�' SYS IV 10 C p . � ti �� V« O Cyr ��^ �«Y 1vc} �Y6q C�� � ���•��50 � tl� ��.Yi'� N ^uy�'1 0 YYY 1•i ! bi 6� Rags ATIL , a N a r 1 �VY �, ilia i�. +Ye9g S 9= Cede. S e '. Ya;b S .N V Z e e y ,Stl$Y 14 `s- V ice.. Y.si C yy p1.31 Y p ¢p M N i is-is Y pp r �A= gy p tlN y �tll -0 6 01�s E b �-M W= a• `$ ��W �Vi p� yy g ,rf' s x fsa i� pp !x' `� ftl• MO usd M. 3.7z rb�� .q•t F qs.a�+e. .�@.Wi DY.N.� {,� 1► ®$ t Imo q �g� as -. 0 Va.. � 3 O L W f® af.N 4 O 6bb YpN •4 LY LY qj ai �s x..' size e�, r q.Y ram{Q u� g p�/r 2mQ.3;0a .�i 3w vs �s Y� i4 g(.. Qp E,.$ �V 23 gl;_ fig' 3, .I.Yo t_ �L 61B SOYY. �..k L v ail fill b fir 3 O ®N- +. alei Dam .s 3 v Y Y Is gig YN sa S` M gal . R • -e �� s � N` a— �C • prr�� g�.. N. Uyb YgQ�.a Ds s a� 0; 85sa ' -ss gd �2�yp- e"s I ,a L L Ju fsijJ P! �9 O� �� •�i+� r .Y. N�°�'i a.r �: � i Q y' tl �i� a LU sy®``iYYO o LrVSL P�L L� ii O+pyL "oyMy 'i ! fS.�C Nml ��Y`+ee9 y CN .gym 1..,.�. $ as 21 S r _ay q V` M !g �y O� i Ao$ S Z4 g$9 c� sv w.L�m. V 3 &r'i si , p ii m G Y a ire A ZE �' garr 3 �y J =s LA` !gg 6 sY n ^ x an fit 99ii. � g y �g a t V 31 L Cie or 0 0H� e RI If = oY SW .. �A.p �L S M� o law pp � aw 1 f\ ry cc ` .yu. ep w 1 O =•M`. rKA G - +III*c V tl Y 1.'L�tl • VV_w. S M`p`a-Y —%J 4j ale. s.� q 4 w. •. 8 O,lY O C•.v a. Y itlft . AYp ® i ay� pa = IA ? o: o vs 1{�w� � labim 4g o i! tl�� s1tl� s pyr Z+� 0.1 $A _ s a Y~ rd• =m r •• =y so ~ i. W is ob— T Sit 9. N' +p. �*.`v �< � �• �� � �.y� IH 'ova• ^�ai +4 gg �` _ •�`S O `��� Se 0 IL pr 6�V ZA41► Yw.p Y -f D f 61 Rc ^.IUTION NO. 90-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION AND MODIFYING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTA7rVE TRACT MAP NO. 13759, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 56 L3TS ON 14.01 ACRES OF LAND r;;CATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF THE SOUTHERM PACIFIC rRAILROAD IN THE LOW RESIDENTIA1. DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-201-53 A. Recitals: (i) Desarch Design Group ,has filed an application for the approval of Tentative, Tract Map No. 13759° as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application". {ii) On January 27, 1988, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 88-20, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, .. Tentative Tract No. 13759, and issued;a Negative Declaration. (iii) On December 21, '1989, the applicant filed a request for a twelve (12) month time extension. (iv) On the 14th of February, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the , application and concluded said hearing on that date. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this C Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found,; etermined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rer„itals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2� Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 14, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, r^getner with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds if follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the west side of Haven Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad with a street frontage of 494 feet adjacent to Haven Avenue and lot depth of 126.9 feet; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 90-21 TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 13759 - DESARCH DESIGN GROUP February 14, 1990 Page 2 Aft (b) The prr,.perty to the north of the subject site is Low Residential, the property to the south is Low-Medium Residential, the property to the east is Low Residential, and the property to the west is Low Residential; and (c) The applicant has filed an accompanying Tree Removal Permit for the proposed removal of three (3) windrows from the subject property based upon arborical survey and grading impacts; and (d) A geologic report has been prepared, consistent with the provisions of the Aiquist-Priolo Act and certified by the City's Geologic Consultant, indicating that evidence of a near surface, active fault line was not encountered on the site; and (e) A preliminary acoustical study has been prepared in accord with the previsions of the Noise Element indicating that a minimum seven (7) - foot high barrier is required adjacent to Haven Pvenue; and (f) The proposed subdivision design has minimum' !1Y3 average lot sizes of 7,210 square feet and 8,268 square feet respectively, which are consistent with the requirements for the district in which it is located; and (g) The proposed subdivision design and. eccomparying maps have been reviewed by the Grading, Technical and Design Review' Committees and approved subject to the conditions contained within this Resolution. 3. Based upon the substantial evide;se presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific 'findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 ah-ve, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:, (a) That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; and (b) That the design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code; and (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) That the tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and (f) That the design of the tentative tract will not confl ,:t with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO., 90-21 TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 13759 - DESARCH DESIGN GPOUP February 14, 1990 Page 3 Ah 4. Baied upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subjec each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached Kireto and incorporated herein by this reference. Tentative Tract 1) All Conditions of Approval, as contained, in Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-20, shall apply except where modified herein. ; 2) Approval shall expire on January 27, 1991, if building permits are not issued, unless extended=by t1e Planning Commission. 3) Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, th,!�:_establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site tr.provide, in conjunction with the applicable School Distr�. ." for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any School District has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the altern:.-live, consent to the annexation of the project site into tho territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever coatis first. Further, if the affected School District has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve (12) months of the date of approval of the time extension and Prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permita for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 4) In accordance with City Council Resolution No. 87-531, an in-lieu fte, as a contribution to the construction of the median island within raven Avenue, shall be paid to the City prior to wilding paTmit issuance or recordation of the final map, whichever occurs first. The amount of the fee shall be the City adoptd unit amount for Phase L, times the linear feet of property fronting---,onto Haven Avenue (+/- 496 feet). (Replaces previous Condition 7.) 5) Approval shall be obtained from, and a railroad license granted by, Southern Pacific Railroad prior V) approval of the Final Drainage Study by the City Engineer. (Replaces previous Condition 12 . PLANNING COMhISSION RESOLUTION No". 90-21 TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 13759 - DESARCH;bESIGN GROUP February 14, 1990 Page 4 6) It shall b ' e the, DeveluNer s responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A�designation removed from the project area. The Developers Engineer shall prepare all necessary reports. plans, hydrulogic/hydraulic calculations, etc. Preliminary approval shall be obtained from FENA prior to approval of the record map or issuance of"building permits, whichever occurs first. The designation shall be officially -:roved prior to occupancy or ,improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first: 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this. Resalution. I APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS I4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1990. PLANNING COMM SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC,!k arry T cNiel, Ch,airmaA ATTEST: ra Bul , Secr ary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify =bat the foregoing ResolutiZn was duly and regularly introduced, passed, ad adopted �by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting, of the Planning Commission herd on the 14th day of February, 1990, by the foliRwing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY't WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA J f �d abtl fl'�T� �.— y�ffi$b ��+,� E 4 r l d C Q Milt � o 2 � r �7yy w Mgr"� gpay# $s ;x$ ? iaZt _gVye �s "sly maim' TL �Y A � -d�� � � .•� its ��` a& ', SIC, =24yor u.q®� '.Fer`pp� ..,,� �g, af$xfx�� ®fppu�� r$^L O. riOs ie rSS Mr$ 9�e & H •. iipi pYY P®Y .. dqy� E�I]63. l I N 2"VIlk O �e rw�w gm D� r r 3 11 � � = p w $ As p r r 8s $ c a 4 g tlw $ �s� 2.2 � ��igg � n• d.-�:�" ..$ `fie oY'" rs ^i��ciCioi3" Ca$ �w .ram el-tl- 's. ' ho w Ouus`b. aw I Y f .� a�M . Y�>•��S 't—��, Yp• S � Oa 8■y A qg gQFY� iq� u. Q3p his er u- ® - p �g w9 C91 C 4 qY 6 y yB tldp.MA_�Y��t O$a — �b®�M Bfi Wv�m Q CV itl� �'1��• 69Y6 2 �R NY.Yp°��S M1V O L" @M [s[s A �y�wg1 $@ $N�eS' 'q o.:: PP pv. ®ap 'y''n°��e.$ xa i t �:H 46 TL d is-alit ur, t if 3 � - pp n y Ear is MH I 1 14; ix Xv R v • a 1 Y`mY$ g8 Y S'• �. `�ao">,� $ =a�' r .tea a � ��� :� � ;a ,,fie :�a�,a,:-Y.•�� t � _m $r �/ «�.Y�e op ® O�: �`p y ��•��NM 'g�g.-y Au� p .�.. "�A� Yw�' ••9� Yid V'a�r vd e1. s� •s wNgS oy$a .rtN w v.pA a g6'^ ,UQ va x�y: aB6$ N�p 2Q 6+4 Y Yy •z.,�s 49 yob»M V;® g p 'e r Ise Ln .s7.v .�'o e$ oia—,i.`di �.ri ». `';�°g°°y' +#�°,'spy. �'•�. _CwH` p�Q OW �wfq Rdq®g �p9.�LeL/sf�9y`iN ` QQ O m W M w N N e 4 Y L R s0¢ ®r M® PIS a biaX� x A �`��g+i' „v'o,nis6N, _� `A—"o tl=�layp• Nyp, p SN V4pgYQ6. _•�.� � .� �,WOr V.ywp•L ®ML E�A�"! _Y N� m�� ^®�61�1�yV q�WOV� M�ly NYCM�O •rl�M 4 n !'Ms 6 w YlM9 � fa•`1:�1�>P M D C�1w C1 K `I IT at 1 �Yog TES TL I a�``�m r litBIZI IS w ?yita k, V I -As pj 3 � is! so ` QQ N w v q 4l r 114it-Ali Alai I UTZ —a i = V M o O A v .ffieNr is "A% o ae$. 112 — 5 5 3 tzgg �r lY w' 66 - H 01 a {\=� d@ y�w�nYY Cn o R yNa. Rj VY �¢Y� oV 24M. y� G?O u0i0VC4 a Y_w w All e till 3A, Zia M-11-1 75. e6 O w9 s �a$a`p2al$��! s«e 4w +y�srH g0gUd C ate _ g► u g r $ m ■ O'8�J�3i� � 1p p- Y 0.4�u A � M]q`G ��B � V�V�. �� �•a0�� a. q� i IN ifil FAR F� lm i 'YOB i. i yo ,'A J His j® eS s V.• CrO s Gig b i � r Pig Sal k all s Ski I fit ffi r` SOS f�M�V Yf r o DOS •.b®oai K am. 56� ®V ®1 is V tit �I \i � �ke?; ;" J . C- 0 a�v Z As iY �/s a o o �• L a `�3 W = 6q O �•i «`F. GYM `" _u •'ila� �.5 „srr-. ark= a 5 a a sP Q �•s' �$ m1A 4si sW.-bol Y.�O� Ube Q s b 3 S a. p �A. � � Y��`� 9•C. &$�..� a Y sl 2i'n w too a u� 3� l Isk r3 stf gg� s NL a r_ all HE V p ■ so ME! O vi fi.gft. Sr y LR ;, � �• � A!� -�� ,a" ® Asa lia. .5� ��_• e �tl IF Ir ls spay moo@ rr W~ 6 W 7®®IM C !e 9fPW. Mo 6 ® A; Y IV rr S -22 21 39 al 'g- - 9 1 .0 47 � � •� `c a�® � 'r 'i'yQu�� � e yw � 1� C■C 3L � � �� g ew u� �a w�y� � wffi u«o4g� .�.• �� �� V �� � �ZY urn gy�lra� �s _`v`�s�s �� B� SC���ys�wA+ sJsY �■Q$Y�� �_ �®® g_� $ m�®$a �rfYaaL.p NO��\ N� 60M etd 0.0 1nYMV LH �O V� KO�. a �� � �NVW 66M r 1 y Qg , •.p Y �Y � y O ��. M.d Oi� 1� yp` 1 1 _pp p Mit L d ui o fig � 31 r s86. s o it rM r `, affi- a sap wr l W �I sH a; b� s V N IL e$� s= YY O wtpq 4=0g 1 �I • $'03 r z r gig gig ' Y !$� 75 03 w w �Y i • O� e �g ® I Is SX ® g _ nggt �Pb� 8 -To3 ps a 3 gist 3 s •� �s a� Ism d D K a. + a. JJJ � 4 R 11 A20 U r b Ybs• +s= RESOLUTION NO. 1•�(p a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITr' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS, SPECIFIC AND COMMUNITY PLANS CITY-WIDE TO REDUCE THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF MULTIPLE FAMILY DESIGNATED VACANT LAND WITHIN THE COMMUNITY AND TO MODIFY THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT, DESIGN, AND PROPERTY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS TO PROMOTE THE LONG TERM QUALITY OF EXISTING AND FI'TURE HOUSING PROJECT. A. Recitals. (i) The Rancho Cucamonga City Council requeste- in 1989 that the City staff begin to research and report periodically to this Council on the status of residential development within the Community. (ii) At regularly scheduled meetings of May 17, 1989, August. 2, 1989, June 20, 1990 and special public workshops on August 9, 1990 and January 31, 1991, the City Council reviewed City staff's analysis of the potential future residential development based on current vacant uncommitted residential acreages and allowrble unit densities and received public testimony on the matter. (iii) Members of the City Council toured various multi-family complexes in the City prior to the January 31, 1991 workshop to determine the effectiveness of existing land use and design standards in improving the quality of the community's housing stock. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined nd resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council specifically finds that all of the facts -set fort►,. in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial information presented to this Council at the above-referenced public meetings, and tours including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the community's citizens have voiced concerns over the increasing development of multiple family units and decreasing numbers of single family unit developments which is gradually changing the community's residential character and resulting in significant increases in vehicle traffic volumes, increased demands on City services, and overcrowding in local schools. i �m CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT February 26,, 1991 Page 2 it (b) That City Council_ members have voic ed concern over the quality of design and level of maintenance on various multi,-family projects;, throughout. the City which can negatively affect the general quality of the - community's housing stock. (c) That the future level of multiple family unit development can be expected to increase significantly based upon the amount of available vacant uncommitted multiple family land in the City, (d) That such increased developL=n4 of re_ dential units can only intensify the problems assoriated with the items of concern listed in paragraph B.2(a) of this 'ResoCution. (e) That a decrease in the residential units anticipated at build-out in the community will help to lessen the negative effects of those items listed in paragraph B.2(a) of this Resolution. (f) That decreasing the amount of vacant uncommitted multiple family land by changing its usedesignation to single family land will result in fewer total anticipated units. (q) That decreasing the total build-out residential unit count will not necessarily hinder the City's housing programs which allocate funds for development and improvement of new and existing housing stock. (h) That some existing residential land may be better suited for non-residential purposes based upon existing General Plan policies and generally accepted land use principals, (i) That improvements in the City's development, design, and property maintenance standards can have a positive impact by ensuring that future multi-family knits will enhance the general quality of the housing stock. 3; Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Council during the public meeting and upon specific facts ,forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council finds and concludes as f,)lluas (a) That this Council determines that a reduction in the anticipated total housing unit count will lessen the negative effects from residential growth in the c,,xmunity; and (b) That multiple family land provides a significantly larger amount of residential units per acre than single family `ti ;and (c) That a reduction III vacant multiple family acreage would provide the most effective method to reluce the total residential unit count at build-out; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT February 26, 1991 Page 3 (d) That this Council directs the Planning-Commission to develop recommendations to reduce.,'the community's amount and density of .vacant Jr 'tiple family land through the City's formal amendment process for the __ral Plan, Development District Map, Etiwanda Specific Plan, Foothill Specific Plan, and the areas north of and adjacent to Baseline Road within the Victoria Planned Community to ensure, a 32 to 35 percent multiple family unit ratio at the City's build-out, when compared with all other housing unit types. It is this Council's preference that multi-family development be limited to a goal of 32 percent of the total units at,buil d-out. As a goal, the Council recognizes that rezoning;decisions based(�upon 9enerally accepted land use planning principals may result: in a ratio up �p 35 i,,ircent; and (e) That in the amendment process, the Planning Commission will investigate all vacant uncommitted-multiple family land for potential land use change to lass dense multiple family designations, singe family designations, and otr" non-residential designations which may be appropriate on a site by site be ,s; and (f) That the Planning Commission shall develop recommendations to upgrade the City development and design standards to ensure,high quality of future multi-family projects. (g) That the planning Commission shall develop yre:ommzntations to upgrade the property maintenance standards to ensure the long te'raq quality of existing and future multi family developments. ' (h) The the Planning Commission shall develop recommendations on a program for phasing multi-family development until anticipated build-out and thereby help lessen the negative effects of those items listed in paragraph B.2(a) of this Resolution. (i) The the City Council determines prompt enactment £ the aforementioned aoals and amendments to the residential development process is essential in assuring existing and future multi-family developments promote high quality in the community's housing stock. 4.. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ' X DATE: February 27, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM:. Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVTROM ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CFNERAT AT AN HO STNf ELEMENT R .VTSTQN 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO nUQMQNQA - in accordance with Article 10.6, Section 65588 of.the California Government Code, a revision and upd to to the C:,ty Housing Element has been prepared.. The changes to the document include: an update of the Technical Appendix consisting of documentation and :analysis of current demographic trends, statistical information and housing assistance needs; update and revisions to the City's housing objectives and policies; . and development of a five year action program d?sirt° �,d Ask to implement the City's .overall housing goal. • in addition, staff recommend-,issuance of a Negative Declaration, I, ABSTRACT: State Law requires periodic revisions of the Housing Element at five-year intervals, which shall incorporate the most recent information or: demographic and housing trends to accurately assess existing and future housing needs. C•'ontained within the body of this report is a d6scription of the legislative requirements and organization of the element, a discussion outlining coordination efforts with other City and State Agencies and an analysis of the significant issues identified as a result of the update.` II. BACKGROUND• A. Legislate-ve RQaui m n c• The LEgislature of the State of California states that "the early attainment of decent housing and a suitable living environment for every California family" is a goal of the highest priority. The purpose of the ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GP HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION 90-03A. - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 27, 1991 Page 2 Housing Element is then to "make adequate provisions for the existing and projected needs of,. all economic seaments of the community," including the identification of adequate sites for housing. The required contents of a Housinct Element include- 1. An assessment of housing needs and an inventory of resources and constraints to meet those needs. 2. A statement of the community's goals, quantified objectives, and policies relative toff" the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. 3. A program which sets forth a five year action plan to implemerv: the policies and achieve the goals and objectives. In addition to the required contents of the element listed. above, the Legislature sets specific guidelines for the perigdic review and evaluation of the element which shbild include the following: 1. A rev.Lew of the actual results of the previous element's goals, objectives, policies, and programs. An analysis of the significant differences between what was projected or planned and what was achieved. 3. Based on the above, a desc.-Aption of how the goals, objectives, policies, and programs of the revised element incorporate what has been learned :From the results of the analysis of the previous element. B. PJ:evirons Planning CQmmiccion R -vi On August 23, 1990, staff prepared an informational report to the Planning Commission which included a copy of the anticipated work program and scope of work for the update, as well as an outline of the significant issues and additions to the element. At that meeting the. Planning Commission directed staff to add provisions regarding design standards and quality of life considerations. As a result, objective Statement 1 and related,-.policy and programs have been added to the element. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GP HOUSING ELEMENT REVIS','CON 90-03A - CITY OA' RANCHO '.CUCAMONGA February 27, 1991 Page 3 III AN7; •vi�T-S L. Organization of theElement: The Housing Element contains three chapters which separate the technical data from the, housing objectives,. policies, and programs: This format-"`was originally chosen so that the importance of the City's programs is not lost or diluted with the calculations, graphs, or other technical information, Chapter One contains a brief synopsis of the ,-' information presented in the Technical Appendix, while Chanter Two contains tho required five-year action program. The action progl,am is intended to achieve the City's housing goal and includes objectives, policies, and programs. The pbjectives are statements of intent describ$.ng a specific end which relates to a particular aspect of the overall goal Policies axe specific statements that guide decision. making. To implement each objective, programs are provided which set forth specific courses of action and establish quantified targets, the responsible agency for carrying out the action, and the available finaning. The Third Chapter contains, ir. detail, the technical data and calculations. 'The information provided is based on the best available background data and acts as a framework for the City's identified housing needs and subsequent policies and programs. B. Objectives. Policies and Programs: The City's Housing Goal has been broken down into nine Objective areas: (1) To Provide, Quality, Well Functioning Environments; C2) Conservation and Rehabilitation of the Existing Housing Stock; (3) Provide Opportunities for a Broad Range of Housing Types; (4) Provide Housing Opportunities for Projected Commercial and Industrial Employee Households; (5) Provide Housing Opportunities for Households of Low and Moderate Income and Special Needs Groups; (i) Promotion of Fair Housing Practices: (7) Encourage Residential Energy Efficiency; (8) Reduction of Governmental Constraints; (9) Periodically Update and MonitDr the Housing Element. The objectives and 9-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Gn HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION 90-G3A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 27, 1991 Page 4 % corresponding policies and programs are based on present and anticipated resources of the City' and should represe!lt the most feasiblf- ,action ttte city can 'take in order to satisfy the identified''needs as described in the Technical Appendix.. C. Coor3 na ,on with 'ty Aazn iaa: In preparation : of the revised dement, staff has conducted an`--" extensive Needs Ana:lysis,,to determine existing and future housing`considerations for the community. This Needs Analysis was conducted `in Conjunction with documentation prepared for the Redevelopment Agency's Affordable 'housing Strategy, as� it was staf`r's intention to coordinate the development of these two interrelated documents: While the R,.' .study will first result in a general concepi*uai strategy, which will later be formulated detailed action elements, the housing eJsment swats forth specific action programs whi,cli are to„ be implemented over a five year period. Jh2xoggxa, in order to Cnaure eons Ig�,An,en-t b t4regn thAZA t,Yo documents `VX&gram heg h.3ftn added to ,the;,i?ousin4��n�a;t Lo rssMira the inc_r�rooxffition of tExa mn Ln 11'i Action, elements of the Afford-dbly� F?n,�_ g atr&t = or_ce them arti dfjxaloaed5. I3. Coordination with State Agg dies: As required by State La,•, the must submit a copy <.' the draft Housing Element for review by the Department of Housing and Cormnunity Development (HCD) . A 45- day review period is required in the case of a housing element amendment;, _.fter which time HCD shall provide the City with written findings regarding the adequacy of the element toward meeting requirements of Article 10.6 of the,.--- Government Code. Previously, the comments from HCD were considezed to be advisory only. However, as a result of recent legislation (SB 2274), which became effective 1/l/91 ' City's must either make efforts to substantially comply with HCD's comments, or not make changes and adopt the element wi;h' °lildiigs stating why the .City believes there is substantial compliance with State requirements even though HCD had expressed concerns. In addition, HCD is now required to review the final adopted element, determine �^ whether it is in compliance with State Law, and E then report those findings annually to the k legislature. k �jr� PLANNING COMMISSICtt¢StR' '.c REPORT � GP HOUSING '.NEMEM 'kin r�_3N w0-03A - CITY OF :tANCHO CUCAMONGA/ February 27; 1991 6J Page 5 A copy of Rancho Cucamonga's t7,raft Housing Element was sent to 'HCD in October, 1990, and written ConLments were received back on December 17, ;�990. A copy of HCD's cntpments are attached as Ex,liibit A. Staff has made a diligent effort to cam-Ply with those comme•.ts. Resulting modifications to the element made in response to the comments have been indicalltad as strike-out and bold in tirc text and a summary of those changes are attached c Exhibit_B. Once the 'element is adopted by City Council, a c,apy of the final text -will be sent to HCD _or raeir review along with a cover letter describing the City's responses to their cc* ients. E, Ri�gni fi ran Issues : As a " result of State requirements and the needs assessment conducted for the Housing Element update, there have been some additions La well as significant issues identified in the revised element. 1. Housing and �:Popslatitin Build-Out rorecasts: Housing and population build-out AML forecasts have increased significp-ntly from what was previously indicated in' the 1984 Housing Elcsaent u - ?ate. In 1984, the forecasts were based upon data provided by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) in their 182 Modified Housing Projections. Recent estimates of build-out population and hot,sinc have been based upon current land use "designations, vacant land availability, and State Department of Finance annual housing uhd population updates. Population and housing estimates in 1984 were, 127,500 and 45,750 Tespectively, as compared to recent City es'.'smates of 157,079 and 57,016. It is .`nportant to note that 'these figures may change again once the final' 1990 Census results become available. 2. 'Joaba/Sousing Balance and Capture Rate: In :3.989 SLAG published their Cv)wth Management „Plan (GMP) for tl�e Southern California Region in which they attempted to address housing, mobility, and air quality through pr_dicted growth patterns of jobs and housing. The GMP LiAicates that an improved jobs/housing br.%aace in the region (a-shift of new jobs to PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' GP HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION 90-03A CITY OF W-MCHO CUCA14ONGA February 27, 1991 Page 6 housing rich areas and of new housing to job rich areas), should, among otl-Ir things, help reduce further .congestion and...help improve air quality in the region. SCAG estimates that by the year 2010 the region will have a jo'kAN to housing ratio of 1.22 to 1. However, projections for the City through build-out indicate that Rancho Cucamonga will have job/housing ratio of 1.80 to 1, which =' indicates. that the City will be job rich. As a result, programs are necessary to ensure that a significant percentage of those`,who work in tie City will be able to live in` the City as well'..; Jobs/housing balance is not an 'entirely new c&ncept and, in fact, had been addressed in the F;�eviuus housing element. However, as a y, result of the:,increased concern regarding this ' issue not only have the progr ms contained in the previous element been co-11tinued, but new programs have been aaded. This issue, is addressed. in Objective Statement 4 and its related policy and programs. 3 Housiag A6zistance, Needs: Eag anal Housing H do -,s ccm n : State law I; requires SCAG to complete a detailed Housing i .:. Needs Assessment which identifies the existing housing needs as well as the projected five- year )sousing needs for a jurisdiction. The intent is to ensure that jurisdict .ons will ue able to accommodate the forecasted growth-'as well as to be able to accommodate the existing and projected number of lower income households. I The Regional Housing Needs Assessment, (RHNA), estimated that 'Rancho Cucamonga has 3,069 existing very low and -ow income households ' currently in need of assistance. In addition, SCAG has predicted that an,'additional 9,568 households will be needed in'"the City by 1994, of which 2,375 are estimated to be vecy low and low income. Based upon the City's five- year growth. projections it is estimated that between 9,169 and 11,'916 units will be constructed through 1994 (Table A-15 in k Chapter 3) . As these projections take into AOL I PLANNING COMMISSX?4N,STAFF REPORT GP HOUSING ELEMEISr REVISION-90-03A - CI7Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 27, 2,991 Page 7 Ask account reduced development activity anticipated in the next several years, it is likely that th City will be able to meet the total number of housing units indicated by the RHNA. so�cia� Nec�tj3 ,goj ,lationG Other;,_.ousing assistance needs which have been addressed in the element include special needs populations such as minorities, senior citizens, single heads of households, and the homeless. Of significant concern was the identification l of the -City's homeless 'population. To accomplish this, staff conducted a survey of local law and code enforcement agencies, social service offices, as well as local churches and informed citizenry. It was determined that on an average daily basis there are approximately 25 persons or less in need of shelter. .As a-result, programs have been added to the housing element to facilitate- the development of emergency shelters and transitional housing to accommodate the identified need, (Programs- 5.B.1., 5.C.1., 5-.C.2., and 5.D.1.) . IV. ENVIRONMENTAL. A S .SSM RM? Staff has reviewed the Initial Study Part I, and completed the Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has found that no significant environmental impacts will occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Housing Element Revision 90-03A. V. FACTS FOR FINDIN S: 1. The proposed revision and amendment of the Housing Element w-'.1: not have a significant impact on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study Part II. I 2. The proposed Housing Element Amendment is in substantial conformance with the provisions of Article 10.6•of the Government Code as evidenced by the revisions made to the document at the request of the State Department of Housing and Community Development. 3. The proposed Housing Element Amendment is consistent with the other elements of the General Plan as provided througki the organization and construction of the General Plan into super PLANNING CQMMISZION STAFF REPORT GP HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February` 27, 1991 Page 8 elements in which the goal, objectives, and policies contained in these elements are interrelated and dep,z dant upon one another, and as a result of the recent technical update to the General Plan adopted January 4, 1989. 4. The proposed amendment furthers the attainment of the overall housing goal through the development and required implementation of the five-year action program and quantified objectives which promote the preservation, .,' maintenance, f , improvement, and development of housing, opportunities for all economic segments of the community. VI. CORRER ONDEVCM This item has, "bef advertised in the T_nl_�nd Valley-Dai1y! Bul_le_tn new;,,paper in a three !' column ad. Notices have been posted in both the neighborhood and coasnuni`._y' centers and at City.Hall. In addition, copies of the text and hearing notices were sent to the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce and the local chapter of the Building Industry Association (BIA) Notices of the hearing were;yalso sent to members of the Citizens Housing Task ;Torce formed to, provide recommendations regarding the Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing Strategy. VII. "RECOMMEND ATTOIL- Staff recommends that after considering ;information contained in the oral and written staff report and atter hearing public testimony, the Planning Commissionadopt the attached Resolution recommending approval of the General Plan Housing Element Revision 90703A to the City Council, and recommend issuance of a Wgat4�7e Declaration. Respect£ lly submitted, /r$er ���/// Ciner' BB CN/jfs Aita laments: Exhibit A - Comment Letter from the Department of Housing and Community Development Exhibit B - Summary of Staff's responses to HCD comments Exhibit C - The Revised 1991 Draft Housing Element Resolution Recommending Approval y STATE OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN Cowmo DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ousing Policy Development f1lWivision 'mM00 Third street, Room 430 ,cU P.O. Box 952053 Sacramento, CA 94252-2053 �' � -• (916) 323-3176 AM DEC 171990 7 IQ110I X9I1I2j8Ai5 6 December 12, 1990 A Mr. Jack Lam City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Draft Housing Element Dear Mr. Lam: Thank you for submitting Rancho Cucamonga Is draft housing element, received October 29, 1990. As you know, we are required to review draft housing elements and report our findings to the locality (Government Code Section 65585(b)) . Rancho Cucamonga's housing element is a well-written and comprehensive document that includes much useful information about the City. In our opinion, however, there are several areas which require revisions to bring the ellpment into compliance with State housing element law (Article 10.6 of the Government Code). Our review has been facilitated by a telephone conversation on November 28, 1990, with Cindy Norris, Associate Planner. This letter and Appendix i summarize the conclusions of that discussion. The "Supplemental Housing Element Information" appendix attached to this letter contains information about recent legislative changes that may affect your housing programs. For your information, a recent California State Supreme Court Decision (Davis v. Rerkeipy, 51 Cal.3d. 227, 272 Cal. Rptr. 139, 794 P. 2d. 897) has eliminated iincertaint r- y with regard to u,..ing general or "blanket" Article 34 authority to develop low-rent housing. The Court found that a ballot measure need not be site specific or project 4Fzpecific. Thus, housing sponsors may proceed with the construction or acquisition of publicly-assisted or publicly-owned low-rent housing projects which rely on pre-existing or future general :icicle 34 auth..�rity. Mr. Jack Lam Page Two We hope our comments are helpful to the C;ty. ; If you have any_, questions about our comments,\please contact Mario An of our' staff at (916) 445-3485. in accordance with their requesi:s pursuant to the Public Records Act, we are forwarding a coP1 o" this letter to the individuals listed below. sincerely, -5 Nancy J. Javor, Chief Housing Policy Development Division NJJ:MA:bt Attachment cc: Cindy Norris, Associates Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Eileen McCarthy, California Aural Legal Assistance Jerold Walsh, Cox, Castle and Nicholson Law Firm David Booher, California Housing Council Western Center on Law & Poverty Jonathan Lehrer-Graiwer, Attorney at Law Ana Marie Whitaker, Calif. State University Pomona Joe Carreras, Southern California Association of Governments Kathleen Mikkelson, Deputy Attorney General Bob Cervantes, Governor's office of Plannir�3 and Resear<<hJ ' Richard Lyon, California Building Industry Association „ Kerry Harrington Morrison, California Association of Reaitors Marc Brown, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation Christine D. Reed, orange County Building Industry Asso.iation Rob Wiener, California Coalition for Rural Housinl�` APPENDI3L City of rancho Cucamonga The following changes would, in our opinion, br 7,g Rancho Cucamonga's housing element into compliance with Article 10.6 of `he Government Code. Following each recommended change we'cite the supporting section of the" Government Code.. Where particular program examples or data sources are listed, these-are suggestions for your information only. We recognize that Rancho Cucamonga may choose other means of complying with the law. A. Review and Revision Review the previous elem,:nt to evaluate appropriateness and reflect the results of this review in the revised element (See- ion 65588 (a)) . "Appropriateness of goals, objectives 'and polici(,4s" (Section 65588 (a) (1)) : A description of how the goals, objectives, policies, and programs of the updated element incorporate what has been learned from the results of the prior element. Although the element provides results of the earlier element's AOL programs on pages A-108 to A-128, it does not describe how its goals, objectives, policies, and programs incorporate what has been learned from the results of the prior element. B. Housing Heeds, Resources. and Constr3$nts 1. Analyze the': pecial housing needs of farmworkers (Section 65583 (a) (6)) . An adequate analysis should i1clude an estimate of the total number of persons or households; a quantification and qualitative description of the need; and identification of potential solutions and resources to address the need. The most recent data should be used for all needs analyses. Information on farmworkers may be available from local social service departments, the. State Employment Development Department, Farm Bureau offices, the County Agriculture Commissioner and the County housing authority. In response to your request for the definition of farmworkers, the following definition is used by this Department's Farmworker Housing Grant Program: E' "agricultural employee's or "employee" means one engaged in, agriculture, which includes farming in all its branches, and, among other things, includes the cultivation and tillage of the soil, dairying, the production, cultivation, growii,g, and harvesting of any agricultural or horticultural commodities (including commodit )s defined as agricultural- commodities in Section l-dij-(g) of Title 12 of the United States Code)-, the raising of livestock, bees, furbearing animals, fir poultry, and any practices (including any forestry or lumbering operations) performed by a farmer or on a farm as incident to or in conjunction with such farming operations, including preparation for market and delivery to storage or to market or to carriers for transportation to market, 2. Incorporate in the projected housing needs analysis the City's share of the regional `1=sing need by income level, adopted in Southern California Association, of Governments (SCAG) Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHt7A) (Section 65583(a) (1)). The regional needs numbers listed in the element are the advisory SCAG figures. The element should use the 1fficially adopted figures cited in Table 10, page IV-7 of SCAG's 1988 Regional Housing Needs Assessment of Southern California, December 1988. 3. Analyze potential and actual governmental ;-onstraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels including land use controls, building codes and enforcement procedures, and local proasssing and permit procedures (Section 65583 (a) (4)) The analysis of 'building codes and their enforcement _ I should discuss any local amendments to the State Housing Law or the model codes adopted into it by reference, and should analyze the type and/tT degree of enforcement. For example, a locality's preservation or code enforcement program, while possibly of great value in countering deterioration, could also unduly penalize older dwellings built under less demanding codes (Section 17922(c) of the Health and Safety Code) . An analysis of land use controls should examine the City's zoning policies, including densities, development standards (for example, minimum lot frontage, lot sizes, setback and building height requirements, and parking requirements), and other land use policies, including open space requirements.. The element should clarify the time required for review of residential project applications and describe any differences between single-family and multifamily project applications. AML 2 The element should analyze these and related City policies and determine whether the policies act as a constraint in the locality. Identified constraints should be addressed in the housing progr= section. 4. - Expand the analysis of the availability of financing as a potential andactual nongovernmental constraint upon the maintenance, improvement, or devehoment of housing for all income levels (Se&��ion 65583(a) 6_)). The analysis of the availability of financing should. consider whether financing is generally available, whether interest rates are significantly different from surrounding areas, and whether there are under-served areas or income groups in the community for new construction or rehabilitation loans. Knowledge of this will assist the communi-ty to select and implement responsive housing proya;Iims such as mortgage revenue bonding, a mortgage credit certificate program, or targeted low-interest rehabilitation loans. Information on the availability of financing may be available from local financial institutions under the federal Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) , which requires specified lending institutions to disclose the number, amount, and locatio,, of mortgage and rehabilitation loans originated o:; purchased, and under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), which requires that specified lending institutions help meet the credit needs of their communities. The CRA requires that each lending institution covered by the Act provide maps describing its lendinc; areas and information about the 1, .pes of, loans it provides, and that a public file bE 'established containing writter. comments from the community regarding the institution's CRA performance. Lending institutions not covered under HMDA may be required to provide comparable information by State disclosure law (Section 3581b of the Health and Safety Code) Housing Progr^ms 1. While the element include: an extensiae array of policy and program statements, the program section of the element should include more d_tailed program descriptions and more strongly indicate commitment by the City to implement each program action to Ensure the City can meet housing element requirements (Section 65583(c)(1-5)) . Terms such. as "consider" and "encourage" do not indicate a commitment to implement. Examples of programs to be 3 �tl� expanded or which should include a stronger, commitment to implement include, but rae not limited to, the following: Auk Ip Program 3.A.1: How will the City "facilitate opportunities for a variety of- housing types..."? Will the City offer'incentives, autl;orize the use of pt_,-approved project plans, or-,require m-Lnimum lot o� :,owing configurations? Program 5.A.4: For your information, the City must comply wtL* State Density Bonus Law during the study Per o&�--o determine implementation meamures. W�a have irc1u( ed a technical assistance paper F'hich describes resent„amer.dments to the It tax.. Program 5.A.5: Haw will the, City - encourage developers to utilize rental assistance programs? [ghat incentives would be offered? Program S.A.3: The City's intent to consider revising permit processing procedures for projects using redevelopment 20 percent set-asides does not, in our opinion, commit the City tc any specific action. Program 9.A.I: The element (page A-65) contains a number of program proposals to modify the Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing Strategy and Implementation Program. These recommendations are not ,included in the program section of the element. in cur opinion, Ithesc recommendations would male strong program options for the t.tiliza—lion of the agency's funds. The City should review these proposals and support and implement those it determines could best meet the element's goals and Objectives. 2. The element _indicates that between 1,346 and 1,946 households (Housing Assistance Plan, page A-72; and Southern California Association of Governments, page 7 and 68) are in need of rental assistance. The City may wish to include a program to address the iieeds of lower- income householdS in need of rental assistarsze. A significant percentage of this group may be at risk of becor,:ng homeless. ;•, other fio.0kS!'t l. Describe the City': efforts to achieve public partICI..pation of all economic segments of the community in the development of its housing element (Section 4 65583(c)) . in addition to holding public hearings at'the planning commission and governing body level, the City could circulate its draft element to church groups, hour;ing organizations, social service agencies, and community and senior groups. Notices regarding public meeti,ags on tae element 'could be posted in community centers, libraries, City Hall, and throughout the community in public places. 2. Describe the means by which consistency--ill be achieved with other general plan elements (section 65583 (c)). The goals, policies, and objectives of: the - nousing element may conflict with those of ;the i Sand use, circulation, and open space elements, zoning ordinances, congestion management plans, redevelopment, and capital improvement plans. Conflicts between general plan elements shovld be acknowledged and the plan amended to eliminate su6h conflicts. A broader discussion of general plan consistency requirements may be found in the Governor!- :Office of Planning and Research General Plan Guidelines. Y 13A iC.AW NG 1 5 SUPPLEMENTAL HOUSING ELEMENT LNFORMATION The following infa=ar ori.represents recent legislative changes in housing element •pr State planning law. This information is provided for your general information and to assist you in updating your housing element. 1. Chapter 1451, Statutes of 1989,, require all housing elements to include, by January 1, 1992, additional needs analyses and programs to address the potential conversiot of existing assisted housing developments to non-low-income housing :ses during the next ten-year period (Government Code Section 65583(a) (8) and (c) (6)) . Assisted housing developments'-are defined to include any multifamily rental housing assisted u„der any of the following programs: 1. Federal: Section 8, 213, 221(d) (3), 236, 202, and 101; CDBG and. FmHA Section 515. 2. State: Multifamily revenue bonds 3. Local: Multifamily revenue bond, redevelopment, in- lieu, inclus 6i-nary,' and density bonus program units with affordability controls. MW "CD is developing a technical assistance document to assist laaalities in meeting the new requirement. 2. Chapter 1140, Statutes of 1989,' amends hous:• ,g element law (Section 65583(a)) to require the housing program of an element to include, by January 1, 1990, a description of th,'� use of moneys in a redevelopment agency0s Ire and Moderate Income Housing Fund if the locality has established a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law (Division 24 (commencing with Section 33000) of the Health and Safety Code) . 3. Recently enacted State general obligation bond programs established by Proposition 77 (California Earthquake Safety and Housing Rehabilitation Bond Act of 1953) and Proposition 84 (Housing and Homeless Bond Act of 1988) are currently available to assist localities Fifth funding to implement low- and very low-income housing programs.. These funds may be used for the following activities: a acquisition and rehabilitation of rental housing and residential hotels, ■ rehabilitation of owner-cccupied housing, 1 i seismic rehabilitation of multifamily rental housing, R rental housing construction, i acquisition and rehabilitation of emergency shelters, W development of migrant farm labor centers, and t development of congregate housing foil families and , the elderly. Inquiries regarding these and other assistance prca_rams offered by HCD should be directed to: California Department of Housing and Comiaunity Development Division of Community Affairs P.O. Box 952054 Sacramento, cA 94252-2054 �= Telephone (9161 322-1560 4. %hapter 842, Statutes of 1989, amended State density bonus law (Government Code Sections 65913.4, 65915 and 65917) by providing for additional local incentives for affordable .ti housing units and strengthening income targeting requirements, _�.., among ether changes. We have attached a copy of the amended law for your informatit\n. HCD is developing a technical assistance document to assist localities in meeting tliii new requirements. 5. Chapters 1571 and 1572,`,. Statutgs of 1915, require that manufactured housing must be permi ted on permanent foundation systems on all single-family-zoned lots, soaong as the unit is no more than ten years old on the date of application, and meets federal and optional local st:t' ;Ards specified in Government Code Section 65852.3. (A lcc�xtit_v.may exempt from this provision any place, building,;-*'t:ructu .n , or other object listed on the National Register of Ristor'ic -,laces.) Section 65852.3 specifies that local governments may impose architectural requirements on the . \nutactured home itself which are limited to roof overhang, roofing material, and siding material, so long as the require7nents, or any other lot development standards imposed on . the manufactured home L installation,"-do not exceed those required for a conventional home on the same lot. Section 65852.4 has been added to the Government-Code to spea'ify that a locality may not subject an application to install a manuf-nctured home an a foundation j system on a single-family lot to any administratkre permit, planning, or ,deve� opment process or requirement unless it is dentical to those which would be imposed on a conventional home on the same lot. F f�. _ r AESPONSE TO TEE DEPARTMENT OF 'HOUSING AND QMMUNITY DEVRLOPMENT COMMENTS The Following summarizes revisions made<- to+ the Eousing Element in_response to comments received fpcm the Department of Housing and Community Development (ITCD) The revisions includes' in the text have been rr,epared following the spirit and intent of those comments toward ensuring that,our Housing Element,is in substantial compiance wits, the requirements of - Article 10.6 of the California Government Code. A. RevieK and Rev;S M' Section_XI of Chapter Th :;e of the Housing Element containing th,_-' evaluation of the previous element's goal, objectives, policies, and programs has been, revised to provide further discussion on how the revised element`s goal, objectives, policies, and programs incorporate what has been learned from the results of the prior element. This has been accomplished by the inclusion of, an "a-- ,:or.," statement after each discussion section to deta.:ribe how the results of the evaluation and analys-:s of the rrevious element are to be incorporated into the revised element. i B. Housing.NP a a Rgs„Q?)�ces and Co':'tGtra i rat s l.' A thorough evaluation of tte special needs of farmwcvkers in the City has been pzpyided, and ` can be found in Chapter 3, Section VII, Page A-87 of the Element. As part of the analysis - staff contacted those agencies suggested X . HCD. In addition, an analysis of p.evious farmworker needs, as identified in the.,, 1980 J Census was provided. ;``` It was found that persons engaged,in\.farming, forestry, and fishing occupations in 1980- comprised only .25% of the City's population. I Based upon the ;mount of development that has occurred sine, 1980, it >.!s believed that the number of pers7ns currently involved in these occupations is significantly lower. Persons cont.-acted regarding numbers of fazmworkers in the City were, uzzable to provide information regarding current figures, alrhou h the g State Employment Development Department did indicate that the reed for f-armworkers in the City of Rancho Ct}camonga has dropped drastically in reaen°; years. It is felt, therefore, that housing opportunities for farmworkers can be accommodated through expansion of the City's affordable housing VFW stock. `L. The regional neF,ds 'nurhbers provided in the SoutherL California Association of Government's . (SCAG) 1988 Regional Housing Needs"Assessment of Southern California, gable 10, have been incorporated `irii-- the Housing Element as requested. Although, it should be noted that in this Fame dovuiuent . .SLAG indicated support fc r" `use )f the aavisory figures in place of the adz;pted allocations k -hen a community felt that those, numbers t Bette~ represented the level of need ''that may occur in the bQ si.ag element,planning period. 3. Aiditional discus added to the rnmental Constf` kon of the "> Element, Chapter 3, £agate to A-118, regarding land T;se and zoning, building codes and their enforc„ment, as weft as a„ AWL ' description of the City's residential review process. ii66dd upon,this discussion and analysis it was: `" deterarine.'d that: the ,�itv's .governmental processing pioced%Tes and: standards ,f ' devs.inpment do not pose a significant hardship on the 'd6 e.lopment of affordabte housing., Howev-r, "Program 8.A.3 has been added to ttii- Element ,'requir£ng the. City to eva1rldtE.1. established project review processing proczduresI to determine whether expedited process int." ::'s poss,:ble: for housing developmerts using the Redevelopment Agency's 20 p-krcetat ,set-aside funds or for projects proposing a proportion of units affordable to lower Income households. qW 4. The City 2z`_ •made a diligent effort toward obtaining information regarding the availabilit;r of financing tram- the various local financial insti utie.', -:ocated in the Community, S'•,aff conducted a phone survey of the 12 lend_ng instit.dti.oro which have offices or branch offices 1*JL3CeGY in Raiacho Cuca'n—nga. Th,',banks ' wara questioned regarding - the general availability of financing in all areas . :of the City and ".he possibility that interest crates varied for different areas of the community. In addition, the City wao able to obtain copies of'their Community ReinvestmenAy act Statements from some or th. institutions. As a result, the City was provided with'verbal a , j, ani`writter. statements by these 'iastitutions Lr affirming that their lendr.:xg practicer 'are . ' based npon each individual applicant's credit- worthiness, without regard for such factors as sex, race, age, marital status, income level, social comp_)siton""of an area, or the age or;,, lecation of a dwelling. Also, based upon evidence of construction activity'on -available-vacant land, residential financing appears to be-' generally available t*rouyhout the City. Th,are is no evidence of any > mortgage deficient areas for new constructicn or rehabilitation loans. C. HQ�3ng 2ro9'ams "O 1. The letter received by the City from HCD ` expressea concern with the wording of some of thl ,"programs contained in "'=ice revised Element, as' it related to the tl.ty's intent toward carrying out the imp;_ementation of those programs. Although Rancho Cucamonga has every . intention of following up on and completing the programs as stated in the element, the language contained in t*:se action statements w.- reviawed and revised ,;n order to indicate a stronger commitment :towa�ld ' their implementation. The programs are contained in Chapter 2 of the Revised Hozising 'Element. z Two items of particular concern that were 4: raised in the contents involver.'; Programs 3.A.1 and 9.A.1. , The following provides £' an additional explanation regarding these programs: Program 3.A,I: The question was raised about;] how the City will "facilitate opportunities far a variety, of housing types.," As previously stated in the Program, and as .it continues to state, opportunities for a variety of housiing types will be facilitatld t`;rough t)he implementation of the Land Use Pl�in, t Development District Map, and the., Community Plans on the remaining vacajit land resources of the City. As provided in the discussion in Chapter.-3, Sectior.,,t; lg, regarding the Rancho Cucamonga's Land Use and Zoning, the distribution- of available land use categories throughout the City and the variability of development standards allowed in the City°s Development Code alid Community Plans provides for a wide variety of housing types to b& developed. ' Program 9.A.1 Regarding the City's development, an Affordable Housing Strategy for use of the Redevelopr'aent Agency's 20 percent set-aside funds, the comment that the City has proposals to "modify" the Strategy are incorrect. Prior `to development of this draft Strategy, the City did ►ot have a consolidated housing program for use of its 20 percent set aside ;funds. It is through preparation of this Strategy, which has not yet been adopted, that the City .gill develop a comprehensive program. Once the Strategy has been approved and adopted, the Housing Element will then be revisc,'d as ^�Jessary to ensure consistency between the doCL ,:ents. Aft k,further discussion of the Redev-llopTent Affordable Housing Strategy is provided in Chapter 3, Section 6, Page A-65. f 2. In response to the statement that the City stay wish,to include a program to adriress the needs of lower income households in need of rental assistance we would like to point out that there are already-four'-!programs contained in the element which address this concern. These programs are contained in Objective Area 5 and can be summarized as follows: Pxog1,,•am 5.A.2: Provides for the continuation .,of the Residential 14ulti-Family Mortgage Revenue Bond,Program. Program 5.A.5e That the City shull encourage private developers to utilize OFederal rental assistance programs``,by providing informational documents regarding these programs to applicants early in the review process. Program 5.A.6: The City shall continue to support the use of a voluntary '(_ent stabilization, known as the Mobile Home Park Accord, as a means of keeping rents at reasonable levels to allow the continued i affordability of this method of housing. I4 program 5.A.7: That the City shall develop and implement an Affordable Housing Strategy.. ,' to utilize the Redevelopment. 26 percent tax increment tuna which will .'include programs 4 { aimed at maintaining and/or ,providing i affordable rental housing. IJ J D. Qthet Tonicgi 'iy� 1, The City has ixicluded an expanded discussions to Chapter 1, Page 3, regarding efforts to achieve public,"pzrticipation of al-;- economic, segments of the comiminity in development of the. draft -;Housing Element. In addition to holriing p,14blic hearings by the Planning Commission and City Council, efforts to;: achieve public participation- incluc'.ed the following: Three-column size' ads, were provided in �. the inland Mal a newspaper of genexal circulation, prior., to both public hearings and notices were posted in the City�s community and neighborhood centers, as well as at the Civic Ce:ter. Copies of 'the text and. Aft n',)tice of the meetings were g given`to the Chamber of, Conunezee and local' chapter of the Building Industry Association. In addition, public notices were sent, to the members of the Citizens Ac•. sory Task Force, which had originally been formed to advise City Redevelopment Staff and the C-Aty Council Housing Subcommittee in the development of the Affordable Housilig Strategy for use of the Redevelopmeat iigency's 20% set--';side funds. Task force members representen a bro d cruss-section of the community and included representatives from the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce,, major lenders, for- profit developers, neighborhood lenders, senior` citizens and mobile home park residents. ''GPI 2. A 4ection has been added to Chapter 1,' Page 4, to describe the means by which consistency is achieved with other General Plan elements, This is achieved primarily through periodic. updates., to theweneral Plan butis also achieved as a result of `the, organization and construction of the General Plan document itself. r 1 i \.. J )j t HOUSINGDRAFT ELE M.. T .. ti ® a i I i I City of T,tancho Cucamonga TMLE OF CONTENTS it CHAPTER ONE: - Page No. 1. INTRODUCTION...... ............ 1 Purpose and Intent...................................... i Logis'.ative Au hority.......................... ..... 1 Organization..... ................ 3 Public Participation... .... .. 3 � 1 General an Consistency............,....... ...,:..... 4 1, II. POPULATION CF AJMCTERIS'1CS............................. ... 5 III'. HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS................................... 7 IV. HOUSING DEIWAND.... ....... ........................... . it . 9 V. VACANT LAND INVENTORY.......................................11 VI. HOUSING AVAILABILITY.......................................14 VII. HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS....,................. ......15 }III. ENERGY CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES.........................15 IX. EXISTING HOUSING CONDITIONS............................ 13 X. CONSTRAINTS TO THE DEVELtPd4W.T HOUSING.................17`, XI. EVALUATION OF PREVIOUS OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, AMR PROGRfiPN FROK 1984 HOUSING E.E WT UPDATE..............18 'CHAPTER TRO: I. GOAL, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, AND PROGRMS..................19 DRAFT FOR 01SCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY ' >) a i r � _ I HOUSING:..6LM4ENT1 CWTER ONE ®RR ' I. INTRODUCT*ON FOR DISCUSSION PLyfi;r;DS ONLY Purpose and Intent The H,usin Element is intended to provide esidents'of the u it d 9 p r ,. ca�nn n y an it It-cal government officials vith a greater un&rstanding of the housing needs. in Rancho Cucamonga and to provide guidance to the decision-making process in all matters rel.�r.ing to housing. The documc�t analyzes existing and future housing needs. �.:velops a problem-solving strategy, and provides a course of action toward achieving the stated nousirg goals and objectives. This document is required by State Law to update the Housing Element originally approved with the General Plan in 1981==nd amended in 1y84. This update incorporates the most recent demographic informl ion and bossing trends available to accuratei;l, assess the staid, of ho::sing ii, R�ncho Cucamonga. Legislative L_thuritg The Legislature of the State of California has identified the attai:.ment of a decent home and a satisfying ,environment for every res-V ;nt of the State of California as a goal of highest priority. Recogni7,` that local planning progr.-s play a significant.=-role in the pursuit of iris goal, and to assure that local planning effectively implements Statewide housing policy, the Legislature has mandated that all cities and counties ,include 'a Housing Element as part of their adopted local General Nan. Section 65583 of the California Government Code requires the preparation of a T L+ sing Element tG "consist of an identification and Analysi3 of existing end projected housing needs and a statement of goals., pa"icier, quantified objectiu,c, and scheduled programs for the preservation., improvement, and development: af housing." 'The Housing Element must also identify and make "adequate provision for the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community." 1A1'l support data and sources are cited in r1hapter-3, Technical Appendix. 1 The State Housing Element guidelines require three basic components to be. ^' inciuded.as follows: 'j 1. An assessment of local housi-ag ,needs and an inventory of local res,.arces and constraints relevant to meeting:these local nped3: II. A statement(s) of the community's goals, quantified objectives., and policies relative to the maintenance, improvement, ;and development of housing: III. A pvo3ram which sets forth a five-year schedule of actions the local government is undertaking' or intends to undertake to implement the,-, policies and achieve the goals and .objectives of the Housfpg Element r In addityon to the required` contents of the Element listed above the Legislature sets specific guidelines for the periodic review and evaluation of the Element which should include the following: �r L A review of the actual results of the previou3 element's . goals, objectives, policies, and programs. 2. An analysis of the si n ficant g �, differences between what was projected or plann>,d and what�Yas achieved. 3. Based on the above, a description of how, ;the goals, objectives, policies and programs of the revised Element incorporate what has been learned from the results of analysis of the previous Element. ORAL frolq DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 2 G DRAFT Organization IrOf{,DISCUSSiON PURPOSES ONLY h., The Housing Element consists of three chapters. While the first two chapters are contained ,therein, Chapter 3 is part of the General Plan Technical Appendix. This format has been chosen so that the importance or th^ City's programs is not lost or diked with the calculations, graphs, or other technical information, Chapter One contains a brief synopsis of the technical data collected. Chapter Two identifies the City's housing goal and defines the fiv^ year action program with quantified objectives and policies. 1%t third chapter contains in`.` tail the technical data and calculations as well as the ana f :;_ of the previous element's goals, objectives, policies, and programs, The information provided in the combined document is based on the best available background data and'acts as a framework for the City's id mt;fied housing needs and subsequent policies and programs. It is the City's intent t- continually monitor and expand on the established housing programs and to prepare a crmplete update again in 1994. The goal, i,:jjectives, policies any! programs of the Housilig tlemtot have been pr-,pared so as to be consistent with the other, elements of the General Plan. Public Participation Section 65 M(c) of the California Government Code .;tastes ,.nat local jurisdictions must make a .y'7?gent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments �f the community in the devel'opmert of',,the hnusi'hg Element. To a'';ieve this end, ►notices of public greetings were ad!*rtised in a local paper of general ci°t±alaticn. the , Inland Valiey Be".'i1'y Bulletin, utili'ing three-colum ads which are 'la ,er than the mira;rum 1/8 page ad requYred by Section 65091(a)(3) of the 'California Gover; ent Code. In at;nition, notices were posted in the City's community a/id neighborhooLA centers as well as at City Hall. fleeting notices Caere, sent to t,:e l,. sl chapter of the Ek0lding Jndustry association and to ikvmGers of the Citixe:5 Advisory Task DRAP ' FC MISCUSSIOM PURPOSES ONLY Force !rich had originally been formeei to advise the City Redevelopment staff and the Rousing Sube"Oraittee member'' of the City Counnril regarding the development of the Affordable housing for use of the Redevelopment 20 =` percent set aside fund.. Taste force members included representaatives fray the Rancho Cucamongi Chamber of Com*eirce, major lenders, for profit developers, neighborhood leaders, senior citizens, and mobile home park residents. As part of the discussion, the task force members wer_. 'appraised of the up;oming ;•:;.sing El�aent revision, City needs assessment and possible programs to meet Me tified needs. A 45-daty review perioE! by the State Hovsine and Cowaunity Development Department followed complation of the wised H%c Ing Elek. t draft. Upon considreratiion of HIM's rn•itten come-ats, the draft;was revised in substantial compliance with those comments. A copy of the final, adopted draft Element Las, sent to HCD for their review. 3e a1h}eve this gr-alT du -liiq the preparatteR of this dosua+entr bath the TeehRiaar AppeRdinr and A,*Jeettve and pregrammis seetieRs were myev*ewed by the Pl•anRiRg GOMM45sie11 at requlaPly sehed0red pmbli6 FmeetiRgsr A go-day review peried by the Ztate Heal}Rg and GeW1014y Deve'spmeRt BepartmeRt NGD} €oTJgwLd eompl•etiem of the Draft HeusiRg Element; ARK with a 46-day review following esmm Tetiem3 of amendments therea€terr GemmmeRts recexaed €Yem HGg were eeRsidePed-1;-PieP to a� pt sRr In addi ieR; i Pe4iew of Ate deement was advertised *t�"tee 8ail-y RepePt RP<c,JapeP and publ•ie hearings wilPe held by the planning Gommts.aren and City Gedfleil• to reenive pm#bl a aesdiMOR,f phier to adepttonr I General Plan Consstei!cy I The City's General Kan is composed of the seven State xGndated' elements as well As four ���5{�la, elements which have bt-en comduined.tsgether to foal three super elements. 74Ase three super elements are Land We and Development (Land Use, Circulat,Nm+, 'fusing, public Fac-Ilities. and C=fin>`ty Design), Enviroewntal K ,ources (Conservation, Open Space, end Energy Conservation), and Public Realth and Safety (Public Safety and'Hoise). 4 f DRAFT 7 rCY' 151SCLISSION PURPOSES ONLY The organization and construction of thi General PL)—. into these super elements helps to ensure consistency among the goals, objectives, and policies contained in the different elements. For._;example, the Laad Use Element sets forth the amount and time of residential development permitted, thereby affecting housing opportunity in Rancho Cucamonga while the Circulation Element contains policies to minimize roadtiay traffic 'in residential neighborhoods. The Community Design Element contains policies directed at maintaining the existing housing "stock and ensuring the quality of new residential development. The Environmental Resources Element establishes policies to minimize the impact of residential development as sensitive' resources, such as hillside areas, ecological habitat, and scenic t'iewsheds. Hhile, the Public Safety Elect sets forth policies to ensure the safety of the City's housing; stock through miti ar, on;of natural and man-*ade hazards. � 9 9 In addition; to the organization of U.t.-document, the City provides periodic updates of the General Plan which also helps to ensurz; consistency. 'The most recently completed technical update to the Generat-,,P14ry wU adopted January 4, 1990. Periodic updates of the General Plan and Housing Element also help to ensure consistency Frith other long range plans !�.d,uding the Redevelopment Plan, Capital Improvements Plan, and the soon to lie Congestion Panagement Plan. 11. POPULAT�'M CHARAi'TERIMCS Rancho Cucamonga is located in the San Bernardino-Ontario Regional ',.ousing Market area. This market area is in one of the fastest growing regions in Southern California. Between 1970 and 1980, the population of this market area grew by 25 percent marking it as one of the fastest growing areas in Southern California. Estimates by the State Department of Housing and Commvnity Development (HCD), and the Southern California Association of Govnr vents (SCKu! and the State Employment Development Department reveal that the west end of San Bernardino County has captured mucv, of, the market area,'s growth in both population and jobs and that t4is trend is likely to continue. - DRAB FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Rancho Cucamonga's rol,� is shi ftti ng from that of a "bedroom suburW- for the broader region to a more economically integrated city with a mixture of residential„ commercial, and industt-)al development, Between 1970'and 1980 the population grew from'''t6,043 to'55,250, an increase gf_,?ppr)ximetely 244 percent. The population as of January, 1989, was estimated U' -he-;•105,292 according to the .-State Department,, 'of Finance. Since incorporate on, in November of 1977, the Cit y'r,'�iopu'tax(on has increased 136 percent, with growth occurring at anannual average rate o'f.8.2 percent. The greatest population increase occurred -from 1975 to_19i80 when the City grew by 39,207 i.ersons at a rate of 22 percent per year. A second peak occurred from 1986 through 1989 during which time the population increased by 31,512 persons at an average annual rate of 12.5 percent. The Southern California Association of Governments provides individual communities"with 'population projections. SCAG's last a adapted population projectiog for the City provided in the 1982 Modified Growth Projection, predicted that the City's population would be 84,000 by 1988 and 127,o00 by the year 2000. However, as of January 1, 1988, the City's population of 94,614, was estimated to be 71.6 perce:at above the SCAG 1.982 projection. Based upon a vacant land survey conducted in December of 1989, the projected build-out popula�sion for Rancho Cucamonga is estimated to be between 157,07) and 163,228 persons. These estimates indicate that build-out is not expected to occur until sometime°after 2010, probably closer to 2015 or 2020. It is reasonable to assume that the City''s growth rate may eventually moderate downward due to the inevitable slowing of development that will occur as more easily developed land is built-out. 0f course, the housing market,_ iritersst rates, and general availability of money will also have a significant impact in determining build-out and when it will occur. AOL 6-3 ' I)RA P'C5*tytSCUSSiON PURPOSES OILY The demographic profile of Rancho Cucamonga residents differed little from that of the County in 1980. The median age of the community was 26.E years. The City had a slightly higher percentage of younger people, Whites and. Spanish sur-named than the County. About 39`percent of the rasi'dents were under the age of 19, and about 57 percent were between the ages of20 to 64 Years. A breakdown of the City's population by race indicated that 87 percent of the population in 1980 was Caucasian. Hriever, in terns of ancestry as opposed to race, 16.3 percent of the total population was of Spanish origin. j i Of the total population in 1980, 55,250 people, approximately 45.1 percent or 24,930, were employed in the labor force. The two major types of industrial employment sources in Rancho Cucamonga are durable manufacturing and retail trade. Of the occupational employment_sources most of the labor force was in clerical positions foli,awed close by with craft/repair positions. . Of the working labor force living in Rancho Cucamonga in 1980, approximately 10 percent working in the City, based on cc(—`ter patterns. The majority of workers commuted to:Los Angeles County. \ A recent survey of local employers, conducted in January of 1990, found that 11.7 percent of the employees surveyed lived and worked in the City. While it does not appear that commuter patterns have changed significantly since 1980, it is important to note that commercial and industrial development has not kept pace with residential growth as over half of the availaele commercial and industrial land is vacant. Therefore,,it is anticipated that in the caning years the amount of employment in the City will increase, and therefore the number of persons who both live and work in the City should increase. III. HOi1SXNG CHARAcTEgISTIC$ The 1980 Federal Census established the total number of dwelling units in Rancho Cucamonga to be 17,839. The Department of Finance estimates for I ' January 1, 1989, indicated a dwelling unit count of 34,449. Eased upon SCAG's 7 DRAFT 0*DISCUSSiON PURPOSES ONLY Regional Mousing Needs Assessment (RHNA) projections and City estimates:, the expected unit count for the Year 2000 is 49,752 with the build-out unit count Aft estimated to b� tietween -57,016 .ind 59,248. Of the ex%ting units, the majority are of single-family nature and are owner occupied. As of January 1980, P5 percent of the housing units were owneo occupied and 15 percent rente,- Cccupied, Single-family units accounted for 84 percent of the City's housing stcck; duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes accounted for 28 percent;�Imul ti-family units with more than 5 units 5.7 percent and mobile` horses constituted 7.6 percent of the total -stock ck of 17,839. count I As fast as construction has occurred, the overall vacancy rate fir the City's housing s:oc►T, as shown by the 1980 census, was 4.8 percent. The vacancy rate for single family type units averaged 5.1 while multiple family units averaged 4.5 percent. Mobile hor,"a unit types experienced the low,st vacancy rate of 1% i in '2980, The City's overall vacancy rate in the years from 1981 te/i1989 has varied from a low of 3.21 percent in 1983 *.o a high of 1a.71 in 1987, with an average rate of 6.27 for the entire period. Vacancy_ rates tend to be reflective of new construction activity, with rates tendiog to decrease during periods of ''low growth, as in the years 1982 through 1984, and to ;ncreasq during periods of rapid growth, as in the years 1986 thrown 1987 when the average 9 � h 9 yeasty increase of new daelling units averaged 14:(, )e-rcent. In 1980, residents in Rancho Cucamonga had the highe st t median house hold income I of ame $24,868, as_compared to all 37 communities and the unincorporated 2 areas of � the County. Recent estimates provided by Williams Kuebelbeck and Associates indicate that the City's median income for 1989 of $44,546, has continued to be significantly higher than that of San Bernardino County, $29,546. The most prominent source of income 4'M 1980 was the standard wage or salary with just over 50 percent of all residents receiving this type of income. g DRAFT E®R Mscus5(ON PURPOSES ONLY The, percent of a household's _income spent on housing costs can be a significant social °'indicator. The Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development has established as a guideline that not more than 30 percent of the monthly gross intone should go for paying housing costs. Estimates provided by SCAG in the "Revised Regional Housing Needs Assessment" of December, 1988, indicate that there are 5,879 lower income households in Rancho Cucamonga of which 3,069 are paying more than 30 percen't of their Income for shelter. IV. HOUSING DM AND The major factor that will affect the demand for housing in the City is the expected employment growth in the commercial and industrial sectors. During the next 20 to 30 years the industrial and commercial areas in the City will generate a demand for approximately.50,378 new housing,units in the region as shown in Table III-4. It is the City's desire to provide suitable and affordably priced housing in order to allow as many locally generated employees as possible to reside in the City, which is otherwise referred. to as the capture rate. Assuming a_ capture rate that will range from 11.7 percent (currently existing) up to 30 percent (the City's goal) of locally generated. employees, this will result in a housing unit allocation at build-oat for between 5,894 and 15,113 units respectively; I 9 DRAFT DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AM TABLE W-4 a PFIOJEGTED COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL HOUSEHOLD GENERATION AT BUILD.OuT i ktduatrlei � R&D wnulsouring �Wamho� O(f ce RetrU/Commorcial Total Undwslo aEA,cresgs' 1,2214 1,056 11056 211 571 4193 Flow Area Hatt 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.25 0.25' BulkBrtg Squam Fast 21,240 18.400 18,400 2 299 6,218 68.555' Sq.R.Per.Employoa 700 1,000 2.700 350 Soo i Empkryment @ BU1W-cut 30,340 18,400 6,610 61570 12,440 74,560 Pt locted Employees per Household 1.48 Projected Addttlonal Households 50.378 SwW on Yam SUMP sa d Augult 12e7 h m Take: W d Cw CA`"a Mover EM*W MwtW Ansesmrxm. GwwW Plan trod Uncatsgarla gmwal.commuruty,nesthoeb✓,.d WW rsgkAW cangtrWdd WM a oommsrdY;irc1uWW Park e R&D;gonwalaid trsav7 krdrrula!=:rrammaeagky and waratrvbs. Sown r.Fmm Tarp ltl-4 and Tads llW d 1tro O*ARord"Hcucklg StmMgy Frepavd by &Aseodstsa 1 1' It is the City's goal to increase the capture rate to the extent possible in order to affect an improved jobs/housing balance in the City as well as in the region as a whole. An improved jobs/housing balance a shift ft of .new jtyt>'s to housing rich areas and of new housing to job-rich areas) will help reduce further congestion and help improve air quality in the region. Based upon SCAG's recent Draft City Projections of March, 1990, and City estimates,Rancho Cucamonga will eventually be job II rich as the existing jobs/housing.. balance of 1.00 is projected to increase to approximately 1.80 at build-out. It is clear then, that the subregional ,Jobs/housing ratio will be improved by way of increased employment growth in Rancho Cucamonga. 10 DRAFT �. VACANT LAND IWVMTMY FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ON As described previously, the West End of San Bernardino County and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is expected to continue to be a highly desirable area for residential, commercial, and industrial growth. The commercial and industrial employment forecasts described in Table III-4 'indicates a good demand for housing especially when the City desires to have as many employees as uossible to work and live locally. The most prominent resource needed by a community in order to meet the demand for housing is vacant residential lands. As shown in flap A-4-of Chapter 3, the City contains approximately 2,533.74 acres of vacant, uncommitted residential land suitable for4 development within the City. This vacant acreage allows density ranges.of between less than two dwelling units per acre and going up to 30 dwelling units per acre. As can be seen with the present vacant acreage in the;dlensity ranges permitted, there is an adequate diversity of lands for the development of all types of housing. The vacant land, if developed at ,30 percent and 75 percent of the density range of each residential district, could yield between 13,261 and 15,493 new units respectively. As shown in Table II1-5, this would result in between-; 57,016 and 59,248 total housing units at build-out, which is expected to occur between the years of 2015 and 2020. i Tl F, DRAFT FOR 13TSCUSSION PURPOSES QLII_.v TABLE III-5 PROJECTED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY PLANNING AREA GENERAL CPiR' Vacant Uncommitted Units at 5W/0 Units at 75% 1&:4u Use enfii Pike 20 HIS (.1-2du/ac) 118.91 118 177 VL (.1-2du/ac) 334.18 332 499 L (2-4cu/ac) 59.06 177 207 LM (4-8du/ac) 10.45 63 73 M (8-14du/ac) 94.24 1037 1178 MH(14.24du/ac), 13.98 266 301 H (24-30cu/ac) !¢ 0 0 Totals 630.82 1993 2435 ETIWANDA ER (.1-1 du/ac) 12036 60 90 VL (.1-2dulac) 562.73 560 840 L (2-4cu/ac) 87Y9 263 307 LM (4.8du/ac) 264.82 1589 1854 M (8-14cu/ac) 241,37 ass _s3017 Totals 1277.07 5127 6108 TERRA VISTA i LM (4-8du/ac) 26.23 157 184 M (8-14du/ac) 61.98 682 775 MH(14-24cu/ac) 54.36 1033 1169 H (24-30du/acj 29.74 803 847 Totals 172.31 2675 2975 Continued... k 12 I DRAFT TABLE ill 5 DONTINUED- FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONL Y PROJECTED UNW DEVELOPMENT BY PLANNING AREA VICTORIA 1; Vacant Uncommitted Units at 50% Units at 750/6 5: �aeaa ,Rang® 12anaity Ranee LM (4-8du/ac) 59.00 354 413 M (8-14du/ac) 189.98 2090 2375 MH(14-24du/ac) 24.95 474 536 H (24-30du/ac) -IA22? 384 405 Totals 288.14 3302 372—c' . ANNEXED LAND HR (.1-2du/ac) 0 0 0 Agh VL (1-2dulac) 165.40 164 246 1 MW L (2-4dufac) 0 0 0 I-M (4-0du/ac) Q ,' 0 Totals 165.40 165 247 TOTALS 2533.74 13,261 15,493 s; 13 DRWI•t FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Lands sultabICL for affordable housing have also been, identified by the City and are further disc°mod in the Technical ,Rppendix Within the two, planned communities of Terr",/?Vista and Victoria, a c&a�nitr:.ent has been, was made-,'as a result of original conditions of approval and Development Agreement,•whereby up to 15 percent of the total number of units will be made economically available to families of low and moderate incomes. The total number of affordable rental or ownership' dwelling units that can be provided:by these two projects is 2,14! units'. VI. HOUSIiG AVAILABILITY The most prominent type of residential construction in the City for the last eleven years has been, single family, both detached and 'attached. Approximately 71 percer.t of all units constructed were of this type with about 29 percent being multiple family unit types. Based upon the existing vacant residential land in the City, in the coming years a ma;;G.rlty,.4i, 4=psrcent. of the new housing stock will be of a multi-family %w is defined as densities of 8 dwelling units per acre or greater,/includLig condominiums, townhomes, and apartments. These figures indicate that the City'si rowth is following a standard pattern of residential development in expanding urban areas. That is, the predominance of single family development occurs eat=iy in a community's development ry be followed by multi-family type infill. r jr The two planned communities of Terra 'Vista and Victoria will play' a significant role in the future housing availability in the City. As of December 1989, both pianned communities had a total of 460 acres of vacant uncommitted residential property. Of that total acreage, 73 percent (337 acres) permits a density range of 4-14 dwelling units per acre while the remaining 26 percent I123 acres) will allow between 14 to 30 dwelling units per acre. As of December 1989, project applications for 332 units in the 4-14 rarge and 1,439 units in the 14 to 30 density range had been submitted for review within the two planned communities. 14 CJ`�� !% A DRAFT F®1$VISCUSSIiR�l PURPOSES ONLY Additionally, various programs available toFial;,[ow the provision of affordable housing, including a_ Condominium Conversion Ordinance, Density Bonus Provisions, Mortgage Revenue Bohd Programs, ,and Redevelopment Agency incentives are discussed in detail in Chapter 3. VII: HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS According to the. Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) 1988 Regional Housing ;Needs Assessment (RHNA), Rancho Cucamonga was estimated to have 3,069 lower income households who were paying more than 30 percent of their income on housing. Re RHNA also provides projections for the City as to the number of units that will be needed by 1994 in order to avoid a housing impaction. According to SCAG, approximately 9;445 9,568 housing units will be needed by 1994 in order to minimize any housing constraints and provide adequate housing to persons wishing to' locate in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Of this total number of households, 2r346 2,375 are ,estimated to be very low and low income and 1;797 1,729 are estimated to be moderate income. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared, as part of its Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG), a Housing Assistance Plan (HAP). The HAP identifies the housing needs of various ;special groups, minority households, and aiso identifies the breakdowns between Gwnerlrenter households and lower income households versus all households needing assistance. In the plan, lower income small families were cited as being the largest household g,toup needing assistance. As of April 1989, the HAP identified 1,419 lower i` income small families, 353 lower income large families and 174 lower income elderly families needing housing assistance. In addition to those household=_�identified in the RHNA and HAP, the City has provided an assessment of"t,ie various identified special needs populations, including minority households, the disabled, senior citizens, single heads of households, and the homeless which are further discussed in Chapter 3. i I 8-4 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSI0N PURPOSES ONLY � Of these special need Ir p groups, the number of homeless are probably the most Aft difficult to determine. -Based upon a survey of local law and code enforcement agencies, social service offices as well as local churches and informed citizenry conducted in January 1990, the Planning Division has determined that there are approximately 25 persons or less on-,an average daily basis in need- of shelter. The City`s Development Code currently does not include designations which specifically allow the development of shelter facilities, although it is possible that existing definitions in the Code f,)r Grotlp,Care Facilities and Residential Care Facilities maybe interpreted for this use. As a result, the City should evaluate existing Code definitions and requirements to determine those conditions and standards where tYPes of shelter facilities can be loccted, incl;tiding review and evaluation of industrial districts. It it-, the overall identified need of low and very low income households and special needs populations that the majority of the H6ssin Elemen `'g A,on.ams are targeted for in the provisiar-., of direct monetary assistance,. rehabilitation programs, or the encouragement of affordably priced housing. VIII. ENERGY CONSERVATION OPFORMITIES The State of California established basic energy efficiency standards for residential structures in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code which became effective in June of 1983.. 'hese energy specifications require both active and passive energy features for all residential developments. In .,iddition to the state requirements, the City has also included, as part of the L3velopment Code, passive and active solar energy requirements. IX. Ei(ISTING HOUSING CONDITIONS Overall, the housing stock of the City is in good condition. Approximately one percent of the total dwelling units in 1980 had no plumbing or heating according to the Federal Census. This is probably attributable to the fact that all but 2,250 dwelling units have been constructed since:,1960. 16 DRAFT FOR 171�USSION PURPOSES ONLY The City's Housing Assistance Plan '(HAP), prepared in April 1989, estimated that there were 646 substandard housing' units, of which 538 were suitable for rehabilitation. According to City records and in conjunction with the Community Dev;topment Block Grant Program, five areas have been id-untified and targeted for rehabilitation assistance. These five areas are identified or, Map A-4 in the Technical Appendix. Emphasis on rehabilitation programs in these five identified areas as well as throughout the City to maintain the sound quality of the housing stock are explored in the program section. X. CM11RAINTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF HOU5IEUG There are both public and private market constraints that interfere with the developaent of housing for all income levels. While there are some constraints generated by local, state, or federal government, there are also a number of constraints controlled by the market place. The City, through its attempts of reducing;athe local government constraints and providing incentives for the construction of affordable housing has vp prepared programs in the areas of subsidizing infrastructure, lowering land prices through land write downs, and providing density bonuses. 'here are, however, some constraints beyond the complete control of the City government such as school overcrowding and conventional interest rates. It is clear that the cost of housing, including financing and production costs, have increased more rapidly than household income thereby prici.g potential home buyers out of the market. Lower interest rates for both construction and purchasing wCuld' be a significant asset in providing affordable housing and there are ways that the local government can provide incentives which will help to reduce housing constraints and housing costs. Through such methods such as redevelopment tax increment monies the City can offer incentives and programs, as described in the Technical Appendix, to developers in the community so that a diverse type of housing and price mix can be provided. IAW 17 'ORAFT V'O*DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY XI 6Ai UATION OF THE' HOUSING ELEMENT'S PAST .GOAL, POLICIES, OBJECTIVES; c,AIID PROGRAMS Through the last five years, the City has made strides toward accomplishing the Housing Element's goal through implementation of the stated objectives and related policies and programs contained in the I984 Housing Element. In many cases, the City has met or exceeded the proposed target for each program. However, as a result of this evaluation, areas where the City should' continue to strive to meet the proposed 'targat goal were identified including the attainment of a 30 percent capture rate and the greater utilization sf the housing rehabilitation ,etd rapair loan program. In addition, the evaluation provided information regarding those areas where the City should revise its programs to better achieve the Housing Goal. These areas include updating the City's density bonus standards and the revision of the Development Code to allow mobile homes in all 'residential districts consistent with Section 65852.3 of the Government Cote. A detailed discussion of this evaluation is provided in Chapter 3, Section XI. The results of this evaluation have been incorporated into p the revised objectives, policies, and programs which are provided in Chapter 2. j r^ 18 DRAFT CHAPTER 7WO V6*V1SCUSS16 N PURPOSE'S QKY Aft Y� GDALr WJECTIYES, POLYCIES,AND PROGRAMS The goal, objectives,_policies, and programs outlined-,:below shall act as a guide for the City in its efforts in providing decent, %'affordable housing and its encouragement g ent of a variety of housing types. In order to move towards attaining`the overall housing goal through the corresponding iabjective areas, the City must commit itself to speci5c action programs and stated policies; The housing goal has been broken down into nine (9) objective arL�,s: (1) To Provide Quality, Hell-Functioning"Environments; (2) Conser:ation and Rehabilitation of Existing Housing Stock; (3) Opportunities for a Broad Range of Housing Tyss; (4) Provide Housing Opportunities for Projected Commercial and Industrial Employee Households; (5) Provide Housing Opportunities for Households of Low and 'Moderate Income and Spe.-i'al Needs Groups; (6) Promoting Fair Housing Practices; (7) Encourage Residential Energy Efficiency; (8) Reduction of Governmental Constraints; and (9) Periodically Update and Monitor the Housing:,Element. The action programs listed below also include the maximum target number to be assisted (where quantifiable), the responsible agency for ' overseeing the proy:,am, the appropriate source of financing and the approximate time schedule. The action programs are the most feasible actions which this City can take in order to satisfy the identified housing needs described in Chapter 3, the Technical Appendix. These programs are based on the present and anticipated _resources of the City, as prescribed under Section 65583 (b) of tale California Governme^t Code, with the quantified targets being guidelines and not necessarily being requirements of the City. It is the City`s policy of this plan to take a diligent approach in satisfying the housing needs of the existing and future residents. I 19 r -4 DRAFT F—OI1 DISCUSSION PURPOSE r ONLY The overall goal ofthe Housing Element, for the most part, is consistent,-wit!' the goal of the 1961,Housing Elemen . The City- shall provide opportunities and incentives for the provision of a variety of housing types for all econwic segments wishing to reside in the cmmunity regardless of race, religion, sex or income group. In addition to the objectives and action programs, the City has identified policy areas which contribute to the pursuit of the hous1ny:,g0'al.. Thase policies assist in decision making toward achievement of each the nine objectives and the determination of specific program actions. The remainder of this Housing Element is broken down into nine objectives which when combined with thd`stated policies are intendef,to meet the,housing goal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. OBJECTIVE 1: Provide quality residential enyironeents' which contribute to a well functioning wwnity by ensuring residential '�evelopment which,i's not only attractive ih design but which functdi�; .'_'10 protect the public safety and welfare. a4l benefit '`to the community. -ICY I.A To promote the use of development techniques which ,foster a continued high quality of 'residential design and construction and ensure 'he appropriate development of hillside areas. Program 1.A.1: Develop a design guidebook which sets forth through illustration and examples design policies to guide new development. 20 ,r_ DRAB EON-131SCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Target:. Citywide, new development Responsible Agency: -City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: Tnis has been made a part of the work program for the 1990-91 budget ari work toward completion tif 'the guidebook is already underway. Program 1.R.2: Continue to implemen�' -City's Hillside Development Ordinance to insure that residential development,In hiliside_areas is aapropriate to the carrying capacity of the land, avoids development in envirnomentally sensitive areas, minimizes adverse grading impacts through architectural and structural techniques, and prej s the natural landform characteristics. I Target: NP- dential development in identified hillside eas: Responsible Agency ;ty of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning, Engineering, & Wr Building & Safety Divisions Financing: General �:und, City Budgets Schedule: on-going Program 1.A.3: Trough the project development design and technical review .process, continue' to evaluate residential proiei�s, for safety Concerns, including lighting, pedestrian movements, parking lot configuration and design, as well as unit design and orientation, F rticularly with regard' tn multi-family development. Target: Citywide, new residential development. Responsible Agency: City of "Rancho Cucamonga, including the County Sheriff's Department and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Financing General Fund, City Budget Schedule: On-going 21 � If rolq,,I)rSCUSSION PURPOSES 0,_NL_Y OBJECTIVE 2: Conserve and improve the existing housing stock; -including structures of historic significance, and elimi¢iate the causes and spread of blight by encmiraging the investment of public and private funds in housing rehabilitation and public, improvements. POLICY 2.A: To recognize the unique contribution to the City's heritage by historic structures through the development of programs to encourage the preservation and maintenance of these structures. Program 2.A.I: Dovelop a loan and grant program tc! encourage miners of historic; properties to !,,4dortake appropriate. maintenance and restoration r4o remedy code violations. Target: Citywide, appr x m.�tely 5 structures may be assisted. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho"Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Community Development Block Grant t $20,100 annually. Schedule: On-going POLICY 2.3: The City shall promote ',:he, revitaliza4a�n and rehabilitation of substandard residential structures. 1 Program 2.8.1: Continue to evaluate and identify areas of the City with concentrations of older or deteriorating housing units which may be targeted;,for rehabilitation and improvement programs. Target: Identified areas Citywide Responsible Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Community Development Block Grant f Schedule: On-going I I 22 I 49- � tJ 1t �.qD A 6.d 1' A rr0W,,,:yISCUSSi0N PuF2P'OSES ONLY Program 2.B.2: Continue to operate a repair grant program for seniors _and disabled or handicapped persons for minor housing needs by 'providing grants of up to $5,000 to lower income owner occupants of single family residences including mobile homes. Target, 60 households, approximately 15 on an annual basis. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Community Development Block Crant, approximately t $20Y000 annually Scheduler 1990-1994 Program 2.B.3: operate a housing rehabilitation and repair loan program that offers both deferred Loan payments and lo- :ntgmist loans to lower income households, excluding mobile homesw Target: Citywide,,,approximately 24 low income households Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Community Development Block Grant, approximately t$80,000 annually Schedule: 1990-1994 POLICY 2.C: In order to improve living environments and prevent neighborhood deterioration, the City shall promote efforts to ensure that all neighborhoods :of the City, including older, deteriorating ones have adequate public/community facil Mes and services. i Program 2.C.1: Continue lo provide public improvements/community facilities such as street improvements, street lights, sidewalks, parkway landscaping as well as park facilities in qualified target areas. 23 DRAFT ' FOR DISCUSSION PUPIF'OSES ONLY ``,1 Target: Citywide target areas as identified. Responsible Agency:- )�g y:. City of Rancho Cucamonga,. Planning &. Er°iginee�irf Di vi sir" Financing: Community Development ` Ble•k Gran,'; approximately 0200,000 annually Schedule: 0h=going POLICY 2.D: Tne City should promote the maintenance of existing sound quality housing. Program 2.D.I„ 'Utilize concentrated Code `Enforcement programs to : target specific art-as or problems_when the 'need and community support warrant such activf>y. Target: Citywide Responsible Agency: G2ty of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division, Code Enforcement, Section Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule;" On-going AMk Program 2.D.2: Develop a mandatory referral program whereby_ properties identified through Code Enforcement ` activities which have structural or maintenance problems shall be directed to contact the CDBG coordinator. I Target: Citywide Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: 1442 Generalr43 Fundf� City Budget Schedule 24 DRAFT POW DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY OBJECTIVE 3: Allav and create ,Mew opportunities which enable a _broad range of housing types, maintain a balanced supply of ownerh:ip and rental units and provide sufficient numbers of dwelling units to accommodate expected new household formations. POLICY 3.A: The Cijty shall continue ppemete efforts, through land use 4istribution and implementation of development standards, which encourage the previs}en of a mix of housing,�types, including conventional, mobile home and-' apartments within a variety of price ranges, which ` ,t will ensure a range of housing alternatives and enable the City to achieve its share of the regional housing need as determined in th4'-ZA8 Regfonai Housing Needs Assessment (RHN'A). Program 3.A.I: Facilitate opportunities for a variety of housing AOL tYPes through the implementation of the Land Use Plan, Development District Map, and Community Plans on the remaining vacant land resources of the City. Target- 9,169 to 11,916 units Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: July, 1989 — 1994 25 WIN t, DRAFT Fr DISCUS SIGN PURPOSES ONLY - C j( POTE4T1AL UNfT DEVELOPMENT THROUGH 1994 Development-3 50%of Previous Develo;ment at 75%of Previous QMW,h In lgat 5 Years facmV growth in L"Ls Vesn_i®eras) Load Uncommitted 50%of Density 759E of Density SONG of Dmolty 707 of Density use�dW`mac L 'funksf Raepoe funksl R q furrksl &a fa unit_it ER 120.36 0 0 0 0 FIR (.1.2) 118.91 113 27 27 41 VL (.1-2) 1062.31 2s4 427 427 640 L (2.4) 146.85 193 225 290 338 LIMI (4-8) 360.50 783 913 - 1174 1370' M (8-14) 587.67 1447 16" 2176 2473 MH(14.24) 93.29 64a 731 969 1096 - H (24.30) 43.95 .33Q 412. 521 550 3761 4379 C584. f508 Units coustMcted from 711/89to111/90" 1890 1890 1890 ,v t Propcsad units currently In review as of 1/1/90°" 3518 3516 f � jQ 3518 AMk Estimated five year f projection 1989.1994 9169 97e 10,992 "11,916 ' Deevbpm""aedmslsd a1 a peiaosags d the pnvtow growrkrtha o=nod howesn 1994 raid 1M.%M is based cn ac=d en=mmlCed land •Esbwed from DepwmentofFmm=ywdyecnatss / "Ple�ning Divebn Applxstian log ,� I ': �1 I� 1,' Program 3.A.2c The City shall _ review and amend provisions of the Development Code pertaining to mobile homes, consistent with Section 65852.3 of the Government Code, to allow manufactured homes in all residential districts. 26 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Target: Citywide Responsible Agency: -City of .Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing; General Fund, City Budget \\ Schedule: Add to the 1991-92 work program schedule Program 3.A.3: Discourage the conversion of existing mobile home parks to other uses in order to maintain a valuable source of affordable housing by requiring the submisrjoP, of a report detailing the impacts of any proposed conversion consistent with the provi'?:ions contained in Government Code Section 65863.7. Target: All existing mobile home parks Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Not'Applicable Schedule: On-guing II POLICY 3.B: To regulate the —n--inn of exist:ng rental apartment housing to qc munity apartm`,nts, stock cooperatives or 'condomin'.ums in order o maintain residential stability, prevent a decline=4n the supply ` of rental housing, and discourage displacement of residents, ' Program 3.B.I: Continue to maintain and administer a condominium conversion ordinance which establishes ar maximum annual limit, defined as no more than one-half the_ number of multi-family irental 'dwellings added to the City's housing stock wring the preceding year, for the number of multi-family rental units that may be con'erted to ownership type. 27 46 zj L/1-earl Target: Ci tywi ap FOR DISCUSSION PU_r2POSES ON Responsible Agency: . City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Not Applicable Schadule: On-going OBJECTIVE 4: Provide sufficient opportunities so that it is desirable for 30 percent of the projected co mercial and industrial employed i"',wseholds in the City t live and work in the City. POLICY ;;4.A: To promote efforts wh*h. "ensure that an adequate jobsjhousing balance ratiiljis)'jachieved in the City and subregion consistent with'"'the goals and objectives of SCAG's 1989 Growth Management flan (GMP) and the projected regional jobs/housing balance ratio. Program 4.A.I: Implement a development monitoring system to determine the income levels of future ccAmercial and. industrial employed households in the City in order to determine the affordable housing ranges 'for ail „household groups. the monitoring program will• require commercial and industrial employers to provide the City With information on number of future employees,, rate of hiring, job classifications, wage and salary ranges, and the estimated number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the O ���_Information should be provided at the earliest possible stage in the review process or prior to occupancy. Target: 30 percent of all new employee household formations Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: Add to the 1991-92 work program schedule 28 DRAFT FOR JDiSCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Program 4.A.2: The City will make an economic study of Rancho Cucamonga's existing majrr employers on an annual basis. The study will evaluate commercial and industrial employee ,:salary_ ranges and place of residence.. From this, employee incomes will be determined and compared to housing costs for the City. Target: 30 percent of all new employee houlehold formations Respcnsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning.,;Divisibn Financing: Genemil Fund,, City Budget Schedule: Add to the 1991-92 work program schedule Program 4.A.3: iised=bh determination dur K9 the development review'' process, companies which generate a large number of loan to moderate income employees shall be required tc investigate the possibility' development an equity share program to assist employees in obtaining local housing opportunities. Target: 30 percent of all. new employee household formations Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: Add to the -92 work program.schedul e Program 4.A.34: Develop a housing information program that will require, as a condition of approval, that local developers provide announcements to local employers of housing units for sale or rent 30 days prior to offerin the units nt toth s egeneral ubl.9c. P Target: 30 percent of all new employee household formations Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: Add to the 1991-92 work program schedule o 29 DRAFT ECI 2 DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Program 4.A.45: Continue to maintain and update the City's data base _ management system, which monitors proposed residestial, commercial, and industrial projects. Target: Aot Appl;,'ab1,e Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing General Fund, City Budget Schedule: On-going i OBJEETIYE 5: Provide housing opportunities which meet the needs of all economic segments of the community including very low, low, and moderate income households and special needs groups. POLICY S.A: Protect and expand therange of housing opportunities available by location, price, and tenure to lower and moderate income households. Development agreements shall be used as a procedure with projects providing multiple affordable housing units which utilize incentives offered by the City; Program 5.A.1: Continue to administer and develop Residential - Mortgage Bond programs.t,%ereby low interest loans can be issued to first tfiae home buyers making at or below 120 percent of the established median income. Target: First time Lower and moderate income home buyers Responsible Agency: Redevelopment Agency., Financing: Resideatial Mot-cgage Revenue Bond Program- Use to be determined based on demand and market conditions.. Schedule: On-going 30 c�-s zDFZAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Program 5.A,2; Multi-family mortgage revenue bond program. The City; Alft in conjunction with the County of San Bernardino, shall continue to administer and develop new Residential Fulti-Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Programs to developers of affordable multi-family projects. - I Target: Lower & moderate income renter households Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga in conjunction with the County of San Bernardino Financing: Residential Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program Schedule: On-going Program 5.A.3: Through the requirements of ,the Terea Vista and Victoria Comhunity Plans, a maximum 15 pe-cent, density bonus may be' provided for the development of low and moderate ir._Some housing in=the following manner: for all units built under the bonus:-prc7am, one-third shall be for families earning 100 percent to 120 percent of the median income, one-third of those making 80 percent to ICJ percent of the median income, and one-third earning 50 percent to 80 percent of the --aadian income. The City shall -develop a review and monitoring program in order to detetinine the number of affordable units provided on an annual basis and the utilization of the density provisions. Target: New ownership & rental household formations in the Terra Vista & Victoria Planned Communities Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga and Private Sector Financing: Public and Private Sector Cooperation Schedules On-going 31 5�' DRAFT FVOFZ DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Program 5.A.4: The City will shall undertake a study is`determine what measures eeald he taken to furtiler impl0ment State Density Bonus Requirements contained it Government Code Section 65915 for development of ttwer income housing. The City will proceed with the development of an ordinance within the annual w+ r1k program schedule r within 90 days of receiving a project proposal utilizing density bonus provisions, a whichever comes first. I-` f Target: Determined at timeof individual request. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fand, City Budget Schedule: Has been added to the 1990-91 work program 'schedule Program 5.A,5: In coniurntion with the development review process, encourage-private developers to utilize Federal rental assistance programs to assist those groups in need as identified by the Housing Assistance Plan. Inlormation will be provided to the development � i, ca■aaunity regard;ng Section 8 through the use of informational documents provided to applicants of multi-family projects in the early stages of the review process. Target: 20 elderly families, 130 small families, and 25 Large families. Target to be reevaluated ivi 1992. Responsible Agency: City t,f Rancho Cucamonga and private sector Financing: FP;oral Renal Assist-ance Programs Schedule: 1991AAL . 32 DRAFT FoR DiscuSS[ON PURPOSES'ONLY PrIgram 5.A.6: Continue to support thii use of a voluntary rent " stabilization, known as the Mobile Hume; Park Accord, for mobile home pa s past the=, ,urrent expiration date of December 31, 1991, ar a means of keeping rents at reasonable levels to allow continued affordability of this metli"Od of housing. Target: Exis6 g mobile home parks Responsibie Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, City Administrator's Office Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: On-going Program 5.A.7: Develop and implement an affordable housing strategy utilizing the Redevelopment 20 percent tax increment fund that is consistent with provisions of the Western Center for Law & Poverty Agreement. Target: Lower and moderate income households in the following ranges: 1,518 to 3,036 units based on developmeit costs for a 2 ;bedroom apartment and between 1,377 to 2.07 units based on a single family detached home pric-: of $150,000 Responsible Agency: Redevelopment Agency Financing: 20 percent tax increment funding Schedule: 1990-2000 POLICY 5.8: To promote efforts to better define both the size and composition of the homeless :population in order to mure accurately, assess existing and future :needs. r 33 DRAFT !r FOR,018CUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Program 5`.B.1: The City shall monitor on an annual basis the number of persons in need of shelter in Rancho Cucamonga on MW an average daily basis as well as the number a ' re type of shelter services available at that time. Target: Identification of the homeless population nponsihle Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division :nancing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: 1990-94 Ki.Icy 5.C: Provide for and facilita`e the provision of temporary emergency shelter and transitional housing opportunities. Program 5.C.1: Provide financial support toward development of a transitional housing program. At a minimum, this program should involve direct subsidies in the form of grants and/or loans to be,used toward housing entry costs, including first and last months rent and security deposit. An expanded program would involve the longer term provision of shelter-, in combination with job training and money',;lanagement. ' 'target: Identified homeless populations ll Responsible Agency: Redevelopment Agency Financing: 20 percent tax increment fund Schedule 1992 J f 1 Program5..C.2 Encourage the continued provision .of emergency shelter assistance to persons lacking shelter by local organizations, community groups, end churches. The City shall provide assistance to these groups if requested. d 34 , DRAT► ' FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Target: Identified homeless populAtion Responsible Agency: pity or` echo Cucamonga, `Planning Division Financing: Com�rv` ,`Development Block Graot` Schedule: On-going Program`5„C.3: evaluate existing code requirements to determine those conditions and standards where Various types of shelter facilities may be located, including review and evaluation of industrial districts. Target Identified homeless population Responsible Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City. Budget Schedule: 1992 POLICY 5.9 Actively support a mu1V'i-jurisdictional comprehensive approach in a6dressing the needs of the homeless. Program 5.D,1: Participate with adjacent communities toward the provision of a subregional shelter 'program and encourage the County to develop 'a comprehensive homeless program. Target: Identified homeless population Responsible Agency• City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Public and Private Cooperation Schedule _1991 POLICY 5.E Tv recognize the unique characteristics of the elderly and handicapped households by promoting efforts in furtherance of their special nerds. 1 35 l DRA - ^ FOR DISCUSSION_ •N PURPOSES ONLY Program S.E.I: Continue to .allow for the establishment of second units on, single-family residential lots to provide additional elderly housing opportunities pursuant to established zoning regulations. Target: Elderly population Citywide Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning and Building & Safety Divisions Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: on-going program 5.E.2: Continue to provide financial support toward provfsion of'a senior shared housing program which is conducted by, Inland Mediation. Target: Citywide Responsible. Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga,\Planning Division Financing: Community Development ,Block Grant Schedule: On-going.. Program 5.E.3 Continue to enforce and regulate the disabled acc*ssibility and adapt�6,1lity standards contained in Title 24 of the California and Uniform Building Code as they apply to apartments.and condaminium,townhouse projects. Target: The developmentally and physically disabled. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Building & Safety Division Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: Orr-going OBJECTIVE 6: Promote equal housing oppartunitfes for all economic segments of the community 'regardless of race, sex, or { religion. 36 � ' I I, r I DRAFT" FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY POLICY 6.A The City shall pursue programs that will reduce the ® incidence of housing discrimination within the City. Program 6.A.I: Provide financial support for Inland Mediatiion Board; or a'similar non-profit organization, whica assists in the resolution of tenant/landlord'disputes and housing discrimination, Target: Ci tywi de Responsible Agency, City-of Rancho Cucamonga, Manning Division,/Private Contractor Financing: Community Development Block Grant Schedule: On-going OBJECTIVE 7- Require lenerd efficiency in All residential developments. POLICY 7.A: increase public awareness of and encourage the utilization of energy and resource conservation measures through the continued enforcement of the State energy code and City development regulations as well as through the development of public irformw0on and policy statements. Program 7.A.1.: Continue to enforce and regulate the existing State residential energy design guidelines through existing California State and Uniform Building Code. Target: All affected residential development Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Building & Safety Division Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: fi-going r 37 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION pd`RPOSES ONLY Program 7.A.2 Continue to implement through the Development Code energy efficient design procedures and specifications for such things as solar techniques, landscaping standards, house orientation, and sun angle exposure. Target: All new residential deveropments Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: On-going Program 7.A.3: Continue to increase )`tithe public's awareness and `Wlization of energy saving and resource conservation techniques `through the use of public information brochures and by example, through the continued implementation of the Model Home Landscape Policy and Xeriscape Ordinance. r.c Target: All new residential developments Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Di0sion Financing: Not Applicable Schedule:• On ga ~ WEC'nVE 8: Where possible, eliminate goverimental, constraints. ;4 POLICY ,8.A: To promote I efforts to reduce procedural delays., provide information early in ,he process regarding i development costs, and to charge only those fees ' necessary to adequately ;arFy ovt needed 'public services and improvements. i 38 DRAFT FOR DiscussION PURPOSES ONLY. �} Program 8.A.I: The City shall conduct a fee assessment study to determine the necessary costs for the'`nrovision of adequate public services and improvements to 'insure the continued ,heall1h, safety, and welfare of -the ,communi y. �� it Ta1.r 9 et: Citywide, new residential development Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Community Davelopment Department Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: On-going Program 8.A.2: Contiaue to foster open communication with e'resR ct to City st z4ards and procedures through preliminary project review, the provision of informational handouts, and articles in the community newsletter, "The Grapevine." i Target: Citywide; new residential development Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Community Services/Development'Departments Financing: General Fund, department budgets Schedule: On-going Program B.A.3: G®Rs*der rev}s}Rg Evaluate established City processing procedures to al4ew determine whether expedited processing is possible for housing developments using the Redevelopment 20 percent set aside funds or for projects proposing a m!Ri-mH;R proportion of units affordable to lower income households. 39 4D 6'4� DRAFT FoR DIS.CUSS;,'ON PURPOSES ONLY Target: New residential development for lower and moderate income households Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga, Redevelopment Agency Financing: Not applicable Schedule: Concurrent with development and implementation of the R'`m 'Affordable Housing Strategy OBJECTIVE 9: Periodically update and monitor the Housing "Element 4:v evaluate its effectiveness in attainment of its goal, objectives, policies, and programs. POLICY 9.A: To evaluate and update the Housing Element on a periodic basis in order to incorporate provisions of the Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing and Implementation Program, to monitor progress toward attainment and implementation of the stated goals, objectives, and policies of the Element, anc:to ensure consistency with State Law. AOL Program 9.A.I: Upon adoption of the RedeveT'dpment 09ency's Affordable Housing Strategy and Implementation Program, the Housing Element shall be revised as necessary to ensure consistency with the affordable housing :,program. Target: Lower and moderate income housing development` _Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: 1992 Program 9.A.2: Prepare an annual report to the City Council to evalua�ie the City's progress toward implementation and attainment of the stated goal, objectives, aid policies of the Housing Element. 40 {� 1 DRAFT DISCUSSION PURPOSE'S ®Ni.Y. Target: Citywide Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, Department Budgets Schedule: 1991-94 I Program 9.A.3: Prepare an analysis- of existing assisted housing developments that are eligible to change to non-low- income housing uses during the next '10 years consistent with the requirementsrof'Senate Bill 1282, 1989, pertaining to Section 5556., `of the GOwnment r Code. c i; Target: Assisted Multi-Family Rental Unit, Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, Department Budgets —— — Schedule: 1992 j 4 , A/' AOL FOR DiSOLig flN P RPOSz-S Y CHAPTER THREE TECHIUCAL DATA APPENDIX III I� I I DRAFT F oR QISCUSSloN PuRpOSES OSLY TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER THREE I. INTRODUCTION...... ... ............. ...................A-1 LI. POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS...............................A-2 Demographics. .... .. .....................A-3 Employment............ .... .....A-13 III. HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS....:�................. .A-18 Existing Housing and Projections...,. .. ....... .A-19 Persons Per Household.....<............................A-23 Owner/Rr' er Characteristics..........................A=24 Vacanc Rates. .. .A-24 I Incox Y.............................. ...A-25 Percentage of Income Spent on Housing.................A-28 IV. HOUSING DBMD........................................�)..A�34, Regional Housing Demand.. .... .....................A-35 Local Housing Demand.............. .........A-35 V. VACANT LAND INVENTORY.... ... .. .._.A-41 Vacant Residential Land...............................A-42 Lands Suitable for Affordable Housing.................A-4Q-,, VI. HOUSING AVAILABILITY ....................................A•51 Recent Construction...................................A-52 Costs Associated With Housing............... ...... ...A-55 Short-Term Projectt-d Types and Tenure of Housing......A-57 Planned Communities........I................ ..........A-58 Condominium Conversions........... .. . ....A-62 Fair Housing........ .. ........ .A-63 Senior Shared Housing ....,............................A-63 Density Ednuses........................................A-64 Qi i DRAW FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Mortgage Revenue Bond Programs........................A-64 Redevelopment Agency..................................A-65 Alk Mobile Home Park Rental Agreements.....................A-68 VII. HOUSING ASSISTPWCE NEEDS.....:...........................P-70 Regional Housing Needs Assessment......................A-71 Housing Assistance Plan......:....... -4......N.".....A-15 Community Development Block Grant Prcgram..............A-76 Special Needs Populations........,.....................A-79 Minority Households.......... ....................A-79 The Disabled. ,.. .... . ..-..... ..A-81 Senior Citizens..... ... .....A-83 warge Families..... .... . ... _ .A-83 Single Heads of Households....`.....................A-84 Homeless.. .... .... .......... .A-86 Farodorkers... ... .... .... ........ ...A-87 Existing Affordable Projects with the Potential to Convert to Market Rate Rents.................. AML VIII. ENERGY CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES.........................A-93 Title a4 ....... .'.....................A-94 Development Code... .. .................A-94 IX. EXISTING HOUSING CONDITIONS—o.. .......................A-96 Housing Conditions....................................A-97 Housing Code Enforcement..............................A-1 DO X. CONSTRAINTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF HOUSING................A-102 Governmental Constraints..............................A-103 Land Use and Zoning............. ..A-103 Building Codes and Enforcement.....................A-105 Residential Review Process.........................A-106 Schools..... ..... . ............ . ..... ..A-107 Development Fees....................................A-109 Annexations...... ...............................A-111 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Water Supply....... .... .... .......A-111 Sewer Systems.... .......... .A-112 Flood;Protection........... .... . .. .. .A-113 Market Constraints....... .......................A-115 Land and Construction Costs........................A-116 Financing....... ... .A-118 X1. EVALUATION OF THE HOUSINd ELEHEFT'S PAST GOAL, POLICIES, OBJECTIVES, AND PROGPJXS..................... A-119 GLOSSARY. .... .. . ......A-146 I ill i ti I I' I l I , i � I f. i.. Z oe r_ A DFU-;F T F-OR DISCUSSION PURPOS' S ONLY LIST OF FIGURES, TABLES, AND MAPS Page I Figure Al Population Trends in Rancho Cucamonga since 1960.......................................A-4 A-2 Rancho Cucamonga, Distribution of Population by Age Group - 1980.................:A-9 A-3 San Bernardino County, Distribution of Population by Age Group......................A-10 A-4 Ethnicity - 1980.... ..................:...A-11 A-5 Housing Trends in Rancho Cucamonga,.................A-19 A-6 Dis�ribution of Dwelling Units by Structural Type - 1980..........................A-20 A-7 Distribution of Households by Source of Income - 1980........................ ........A-27 A-8 Mortgage Costs per Month - Owner Occupied - 1980.... . ...... .A-29 A-9 Gross Rent Payments - 1980..........................A-30 A-10 Owner Households Paying 25 percent or Greater on Housing - 1980.........,..............A-32 A-11 Renter Houseaolds Paying percent or Greater on Housing - 1980....... . ..,...........A-33 A-12 Distribution of Commute Times...............9......A-39 A-13 Commuting Mode of Workers 16 Years and Older...............................A-40 A44 Annual number of Housing Units Permitted.......................................A-53 Table A-1 Population Trends in Rancho Cucamonga Since Incorporation...............................A-7 A-2 Ethnic Distribution by School District.............A-12 A-3 Employee Characteristics - 1980 ...................A-14 A-4 Place of Work, Head of Household - 1979............A-16 A-5 Employer Survey - 1989.............................A-17 A-6 Housing and Population Growth Trends...............A-21 A-7 Housing Occupancy & Vacancy Rate Trends............A-22 A-8 Persons Per Household, City and County Trends... ...... .........,........A-23 DRAFT FOR DISOL1SSION PURPOSES 0Amok A-9 Vacancy Rate By Housing'Type `1980.................A-F- A-10 Survey Resui.' of Apartment Rents - as of January, 1990..............................A-31 A-11 Projected Commercial & Industrial Ht,usehold Generation at Build-Out....... . ........A=37 A-12 Projected Unit Development from Vacant Uncowitted Lan-1 for the Entire City at Build-out...........A-42 A-13 Projected Unit Development by Planning Area........A-43 A-14 Estimated Total Number of Households and Population At Build-Cut.....................A-45 A-15 Potential Unit Development through 1994........... A-16 Resideatial Construction.Trends ; L from 1579 through 1989... ....................A-54 A-17 Average House Price by Zip Code as of January 1, 1990.............................. . ,...A-5S A-18 Summary of Terra Vista affordable Housing Housing Study....................................A-61 A-19 Current and Future Households Needing Assistancia........ ....................A-72 A-20 Income Ranges for Riverside San Bernardino MSA and Rancho Cucamonga .,.:. .................A-73 A-21 Minority Households In Substand&r ,. _31ng........,.A-8U A-22" Minority Households Requiring Rental Assistanre.......'`', ...`......................A-13D A-23 Distribution of Disabled Population................A-82 _. A-24 Single H?ad of Households by Aye &,Sex Paying More Than 30 Percent,,'A Lross Income on Housing.... .........I...........A-85 A-25 Assisted Multi-Family Housing Units................A-90 A-2F Need for B.ar Residential Construction & Special 'seeds Populations., ....................A-91 A-27 School Fees for Commercial/Industrial and Residential Development Required by Rancho Cucamonga Sct°6o1f.1w.sts - May 1990...........A-108 ;;. A-28 Residential Development Fees.. .,................A-110 A-29 Estimated land Costs by District = 1984.... .......A-116 4+ A-30 Estimated Land Costs by District- 1989............A-117 v DI!6tCC SSION PURPOSES ONb.1P l MAP A-1 Regional Pausing Market Arka..... ..... ....... ...A-6 A-2 'Vacant Land/City Map............... 2....A-60 y A-3 Mean Value of Housing by Zip Code. ?..............A.S6 A-4 Target Areas for Housing Rehabilitation 1989.....A-78) A-5' ,edian Age of Housing Stock........................A-9C A-6 Flood Cont),oi Master Plan of Development...........A-114 r vi l Y i DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY `. --�IMTROD,ICTION The following techni cal appendix data is intended to provide the assessment of housing needs, constraj;nts, and an inventory of resources for the;promotion S and development of housing. This Technical Appendix is aimed at providing he backgrour_d and technical conclusions for the development and preparation of the community's goal, quantified objectives and five year housing program. This portion, Chapter Three of~•the Housing Element, the Technical 9ppendix, should be used in conjunction with,Chapters One (Housing Element Summary) and Two (Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Programs) so that a crimplete overview of the City's housing assessment can be understood, is II A-1 I - FOR IrvO.Sa i.`,SION PURPOJr'E.Si ONLY II. POPOIATIOH.CHARACTERISTICS This section provides demographic 'information relative to past- and future population growth trends, age distribution, and ethnic background. In zdditions, employment data is discussed including employment by industry, occupational characteristics, and commuting patterns. The fo1'r wing are the highlights: The City's population has increased 136 percent since incorporation, fr^m 44,600 in 197a to 105,292 in 1989. * New household formations tend to he younger in age and the number of persons per household is decreasing. The majority of Heads of households work outside of Rancho Cucamonga. An estimated 11.7 percent of employees surveyed in 1989 Live and work-in the City. * Based on a vacant land study, the City's build-out- population is estimated to be between 157,079 and 163,228. r - ':i >x DRAFT `.; FOk r)[SCllS S[ON PURPOSES ONLY The City of Rancho Cucamonga is located in the San Bernardino-Ontario Regionals Housing Market., area, as shown on Map A-1. The area encompasses Regional Statistical 'Areas -(RSA) 27, 28, 29, ar,' 45, which are used by the Southern California Association of Governments '(SCAG) to project population, housing, ; and_e7rployment growth ii this area. This housing market area is in one of 'uye fastest growing regions in Southern California. Between 1970_ and` 1980, the region increased in population by 25 percent to 914,700. In Rancho Cucamonga the population increased from 16,043 to 55,250 during the same time period. Toe rapid growth in Rancho Cucamonga was directly related to A decade of residential and economic development in Orange and Los Angeles Counties, which increased ho;ssng costs dramatically as land became less available and more expensive. In response to the continued pressures to develop, employers and home builder3 looked eastward toward the western end of San Cernardino and Riverside Counties where land was available and less expensive, as compared to Los Angeles and Orange Counties.j� ,c it A. Population: ;^ The population of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as of January 1989 was estimated to be 105,292 according to the State-D�pz7�- of Finarce. Figure A-1 shows the population growth in Rancho Cucamonga'since 1960 and Table A-1 shows the annual population increase sinc<* incorporation, in November of 1977. The Cit 's y populatiofi has increased approximately 136 percent since incorporation and the growth has accrued at an annual average rate of 8.2 percent over the lest eleven years. The greatest population increase occurred from 1975 to 1980 when the average growth rate per year was"22 percent, with a second peak occurring from 1986 through 1989 during which time the population increased from 73,780 to 105,192 at.an average annual rate of 12.5 percent. i A- 3 FOR DiscussION PURPOSES ONLY f n l ! N CV i !Ia . } 1cli T O cm � O E. co ( o O toocq Co w s} as W i 1 ccto o � to cia : co t> a Ci E 'p N tC1 Lo C (a iC t� O tL � Z O , } o � a U n T G co G io g CZ pco G a 41 ® o o C =� t co Co o O O O O O O O O O 0� co tD v Cm O co tD V N r a A-4 DRAFT FAR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. SCAG's last adopted popu4ation projection for the City provided in the 1982 AIM Modified Growth Projection predicted that the City's population would be -84,000 by 1988 and 127,,500 by the year 2000, However, as of January 1, 1988, the City's populatio{ was estimated to be 94,614 by the State Department of Finance. This indicates that. the City is 12.6 percent above its SCAG 1982 projection. An interruption in this otherwise ;steady growth pattern occurred in the period from 1980 through 1984 wben the gro, th rate declined dramatically to a yearly,, average of 2.8 percent. this ditcline .was attributed to significantly increased housing costs created b `,high interest rates and the general economic recession that the entire nztt.on was experiencing Based upon the C,ity's vacant land survey, completed in December, 1989, as shown in Table A-14, the projected build-out population for Rancho Cucamonga, assuming 2.9 persons per household with a 5 percent vacancy rate, is estimated to be 'between 1,57,079 and:163,228, assuming a 50 percent and 75 'percent development density, respectively, which is between a 49 to 55 percent increase from the 1989 estimate of 105,292. This represents a difference of approximately 29,579 to 35,729 residents from the SLAG 1982 estimate of 127,500 for the year 2000. This di.Yference is due to the fact that the SCAG estimate is only projected' to the year 2000 rather than build-out. It is likely that the City will not reach build-out until sometime after 2010,'` probably closer to 2015 or 2020. This is due to the inevitable slowing of development that will occur as more easily developed land is built out. 'Al A-5 z ID �. Q ,6 0 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONL`, �Q c c �.�N 0 � �N N 3 Z�- � � O s W Lf lco in cm C6 (}� � `y. �®■ z jl � 1i �+ y� `i ICE a s - 1 M 19 ,..5 Cf co � a tu i® 1 Lgt m a iW DRAM' FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY,,, TABLE A-9 trn 1:52 POPULATION GROV1 . Ji TREND IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA SINCE -,9 INCORPORATION (NOVEMBER 1977) P�It9d1�tI4L: °,6lncre�,�;e 1978 44,600' 1979 49,540" _71.0 1980 55,250"' 11.5 1981 56,687 " , 2.6 1982 58,662 3.5- 1983 59,935 2.2 1984 61,742 1985' 3.0 65,695 6.4 1986 73,780 12.3 1987 80,420 9.0 1988 94,614 17.6 1989 105,292 11.3 Average Increase 9.2 Average Increase Over Last k it Years 12.5 ' City of Ranc*Cucamonga,Estimated population ". City of Flancho Cucarnorja, Special Census Federal Census All Other Figures,State Department of Finance A 7 �!% DRAFT f�rr B. Age: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES - ,-, N! Aft l Figure A-2 illustrates the City's age distribution based on the 1980 census. The median age in Rancho Cucamonga in 1980 was ,6.6 years. An examination of the average for both males and .females combiy j for each age group, in relation to 1979 Department_ of Finance data, sho the proportion of the population under-five years rose slightly from 9.3 per&nt, to 10.9 percent. - The 5-19 age group dropped from 31 percent to 27.9 percent. ' The45-64 age group dropped from 15.8 percent .;to 13.2 percent, while the 65 and over category also ,decreased from 6.9 percent, to 4.1 percent. These trends indicate relative stability in the younger. ager;groups (under 19"years) with a decrease in the 5-19 age group caused by persons moving up to the age 20-34 category. The middle age groups 2t 34 and 35-44 are mildly increasing in c proportion and the older age groups, 45-64 and 65 and over are decreasing in proportion to the rest of the population. In comparison to San Bernardino County, Rancho Cucamonga's' ,population is youn4er in all 'age groups and considerably so in the 45 and over categories. However, it should be noted, that recent studies have indicated that. in the ag'yregate, our nations population is aging. It is: therefore likely that the 1990 census will find that the City of Rancho Cucamonga's_population in the 35 - and older age categories have increased in proportion to the other age-groupo, A-8 DRAF►' FOR PISCUSSION PI'RPC! DES ONLY d +Lo �t 11 S i M j j " ,�� al ., II CL ti coo I j CIO L �+ j 0) ® ® N cu _� � r 1 c 0N I! II ! hI►i�, ! � a ocq i -0r mto c cz co VI Q. t j iz c 0 tE? © to O in 0 to O ai 0 f A-9 u DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY . 4 CL of /O� P o pp ILL r co c ^, O N N co o I(�►„ III►.;iIl►i I �I( ► ,°' cl) a - o cv co 1 o o o N �- 1 a� °' Lo , d m m e O cn u o ILn -1.) u) o u) o C7 CV - 0 N A-10 �? C. Ethnicity FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Figure A-4 shays the populat; percentages by race in Rancho Cucamonga. According to the 1980 census i .,rmation on race, 87 percent of the population is Caucasian, 2.2 'percent Black, .7 percent American Indian, Eshimc, and Aleutian, '2.1 percent Asian and Pacific Islander, and 7.9 percent other races. In terms of ancestry as opposed to race, 16.3 percent of the total City population was of Spanish origin. This category includes persons of Mexican, Puerto- Rican, Cuban, and other Hispanic backgrounds. It should be noted that of those with Spanish ancestry, 55.2 percent are Caucasian, , 4 percent am',.,lack and 44.4 percent are of other races'. Figure A-4 Ethnicity Caucasian 87% 4r l::n. Indian, Eskimo and _ t Aleutian .7% �0an and Pacific Wander 2.1% 4- - Mack 2.2% —_ Other 7.9% L. do^B Sauter.1980 Census I A-11 , DRAFT" FOR DISCI SSIsC N PURPOSES ONLY / Some uocation of the .current ethnic distribution of the City may be found by examining the ethnic distribution of the four_sehool districts in Rancho Cucamonga as'shown 'in Table A-2. Information obtained from the Alta Load, Central, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda school r districts indicate that overall 7� percent of the school age population in the City is white 19 percent,. hispanic, 5 percent black, 2 percent oriental/asian and 1.7 percent all other groups. TABLE R-2 EThNIC DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL EASTRICT FOR THE 1967-19188 SCHOOL YEAR School Cauceslan: RtinterMtricttty HIspanlc Black Other DIStrict NlZ- -NoM ARa Loma 48M. 79.2 12)'0/20.7 767112.5 2S1/4.7 21213.4 [ Central 979514 2 973i?5.8 675 M9 175/4.6 12313.2 Cucamonga 718/41 170/10 69M.0 Etiwanda 1075167 526/33 }24:0 Ma 7314.5 Total 9477/72 3726128 2t"19 69515 477/3.6 Sourco:1ndMc;j?I Schsai Districts A-12 Deployment DRAFT r FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Based on SCAG`s Growth Matiagement Plan of February` 1989, thy-' West ,San Bernardino Valley is projected to be one of the five most rapidly grpwing SCAG subregionsl, in terms of employment, by the year 2010, with an expected, increase of 133 percent. 'rhis is_comiared to recent City projections in which employment is expected to increase from a SCAG estimate of 25,338 in 1987 to 99,8982 by the year 2015• or build-out, for an everall increase during the period of 294 percent. At the time the 1980 census was taken, 451 percent of the total population, , or 24,930 ieere emplaREd. It is ,likely ho�e4er, that this; percent has increased as studies have fours. thai there is a larger proportion of---'aal wage ;i earner households as more women have entered the 1'aLor force in recent years. Table A-3 shows the type of industries a„d occupations these residents of Rancho Cucamonga were associated with in 1980. The two largest percentage groups are durable ininufaczuring, 17.9 perceni', and` retail trade, 17.3 percent. The remaining employees-hate a broad spread of work affiliation, the . largest beint,tducation, con8truction and health. F 1 The Southern California Association of Gov2ryments Regicr. includes f, the Counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange,.•.Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. There are 25 subregions defined by SLAG in the 1989 Regional Growth Management Plans, of'v!hizh Raiyho Cucamonga falls into the West San Bernardino'Va'ley Subregion. 2 r The build-out estimate is made up of fiture employment projected as shown on Table A-11, and added to the 1987 estimate. A-13 S DF'3' - FOR DISCUSSION PURPPSE ONLY l FABLE A-3 EMPLOYEE CNARACTERIST9CS 1980 Total Population 55,250 J Total Employment 24,930 MdustEY Agriculture 501 Percent Construction 1,760 7.1 fAsnufactud!lg: Nondirable 1,387 5.6 Csr able 4,464 1.7.3 Transportation 1,043 4.2 Communization 1,077 Z 1�3holesalo Trade 1,143 4.6 Retail Trade 4,322 17.3 FirianLO 1,593 6.4 BusinesgRepair i,I3:17 4.1 Personal 730 2.3 Profeasional: Health Educatiuri Sot Other, ';5� .-` 3.6 Public Administration" 1,258 S.Q t�c9ru often _; Managerial Af.ministrative 3,42-7 133` Speciafty 3,163 12.8 TechnicnUSales: Techrition= t44 2.6 - Sales 3,168 12.6, Clerical 4,026 16 Service 2,6-33 1 J.6 Farming/Forestry 31.E 1.5 {:raft/Repair ,926 15.7 Operator/Laborer .,,517 1$.1 .x s+ Source: 1980 Federal Gn AML r t 5-1$ !?9 FOR DISCUSS'ON PURPOSES ONLY : Occupational- characteristics also show a' broad spre d, ,vithin various j categories. The single largest group,` 16.1 percent ark clerical positions within-`the technical/safes field. Craft/repair jobs are also-prominent with 15.7 .percent. .', Other significant occupations are administrative managerial 13.7 percent, specsaltj. managerial 12.8 perc�'nt,--and sales positior. '12.8 percent. y� The State Uepartment of Finance special` ,,t_-.,.� conducted in 1979 looked at plac:!s of work for Jheads of households in Rancho Cucamonga as shown. in Table A-4. Juc`t over 31 perch—pa -`f the household heads. worked in Lo,;Angeles ; County. Another 27.2'percent worked outside of thy' City and in San Bernardino Or Rivers:ide Counties. Th`L-,1979 survey indicated that 12 percent%of-;he heads of households worked and -lived in Rancho Cucamonga. In 1980, based on commuter patterns and trend,. cf, the Federal census, it was estimated that approximately 10 percent of thi";,,opulation worked end lived within the City. recent survey of 21 major employees to the City of Rancho rucamonga, conducted in Januey,1990 as shown in`Table :-5`; found that 11.7 percent of the employees stir+eyed lived and •worked in the City, As a result, 'it would appear that commuter pattern;-.,--,have not changed significantly since- 1980. However, this survey did not e;ialuate the number',�of employees who may be living and'working wit:hi,n the City`,s entire suti,sgional a,^ea. In additicGn, the amnunt cf commercial and;,industrial devei or' _ ' has not kept pare wi tk' housing growt' as over half of the commercial, Zo4*Jpprcent), and industrial, (62 percent), land was vacant as of 1987. Therefore, it is ani=:tipated that in the coming year_ :.the amount of e,api „lent in ,the City will increase, thereby allowing fo—a lzryer capture"�ratP. J A-15 _ DRAFT Y�"•LE&-4 FOF2 DISCUSSIWvi PURPOSES O[LYL ; PLACiE'"OFF W(jRK'bF HEA® OF HOUSEHOLD.1079 Lbce43ow Heusehoid 'erce�t �. L%,. ,rigeles county 4,872 31.3 r`3emardlno/Rivemlde County` ;.;4,187 27.2 Cl..j of Rancho Cucamonga ��,855 12.0 � Orange;.County, 624 4`0, c` ,'San Qiego/Imperial County 2I Other* 3,931 _ 25.5" ° Ettdudirig the City of Rancho Cucamonga ' r, "°includes 13.Wlo no respons-,and not elsewhere ciassified,and 1#. '.rot in tabor t:+se Source: State Qepadment of Finance Special Census'1ppril,1979) Aft i - A-16 DRAFT TABLE A-5 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES 0 LR'. EMPLOYER SURVEY RESt LITS a 1989 ;I Total Number of Emp',,.,'1rs Contacted by City 21 r; Numbv-r of Employers Responding to Survey 13 Response Rate Percentage 61�'9% �4 Total Number of Employees From the Respondent Firms Trcal Number of Employees Living in Rancho Cucamonga Cih11 Largest EmplZyer (General Dynamics) 3,48 � Average Number of Employees Por Respondent Firm: 416 Median Number of Employees Per Respondent Firm 169 Percentage of Total Employees Living in Rancho Cucamonga* 11 J% Median Percentage of Employees'U;An9 In Rancho Cucamonga•' 12,0% Average Percentage of Employees Living in Rancho Cucamonga"' 19.30/0 Calcurated by dividing the total number of employees living in Rancho Cucamonga by the total nurtbe�r of employees from the'13-respondent firms, 631 5,414 a 11.7°!0 Calculated by taking the median percentage figure based on all the reporoentfimrs'percentage of employees iivinm;n Rancho Cucamonga Calculated by taking the average percentage figure fmm each firm based on all the respondent firms. In this case,the average figure is Wgher because there are one or two smaller firms that have a large percentage of employees living in Rancho Cucamonga thus skewing the average upward. Sourre: Williams-Kuebelbeck&Associates,Inc. In the Draft Affordable Housing Stategy A-17 t , PON r \�� L.7 4- A T III,. HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS FOR DISCUSSION PwePOSES 0Nb.Y AML L This section provTJ6i informction regarding dwelling unit_- growth, bath; pasi and present; and general demographics relating "to--housing and household 01Y growth. This related information includes such things Ss breakdowns of " existing dwelling structural types, t�.iner/renter' characteristics, vacancy rates, and household incomes in comparison to housing costs. The following four points are the highlights of thi sectl6n. * The City's housing stock has' insn_aa5ed annually by an avermge rate of 7.7% since 1980, and has averaged 11.6 percent per year since 1986. * Of the Existing housing stock in 1980 about 84 percent was of 'v4nership, type. This trend'. will ;.ontinue' to,- be the predominant housing` characteri -Ic'., * Rancho Cucamonga's median household- lnccme-'o4� WAR was higher than' any other City i,,n San,Bernardi no County,in 1980. Afth * Significant numbers of lower income renter and owner households -are paying more than the recognized Federal standard for housing affordabi l iiuy. '4 A-18 0 DRAFT Existing Housing and Projections FOR DISCIiSSION.-PURP06ZS ONLY IJ The 1980 Federal census estabiiS;_d the total number of dwelling units n k Rancho Cucamonga to be -.17,839. The .Department of -Finance estimates fn, January 1, 1989 indicate a dwellirg unit count of 34,449,,,as shown-in Figure A-S.,, The 1980 census data breakdown of housing typeis containe.i in Figure A- 6. As can be seen,' the majority of housing units are single family, Figure A•.5 Housing Trends in Rancho Cucamonga ,r since 1370 = :, 60_No. of Dweliing Units (Thousands) , 50 ® 0 r�-z— 57.01(1 40 — 36.33fi <<, so 22.18® ` 20 1 T.83f 12.47® 10 5196 0 1970 1975 1950 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 ^20116% Year Source.: U.S. Census, DOF, RE+NA Projections, City:Estimates A-14 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES NL' c tD 6 r co 1 2 a, CD co a rl) co LJv .8% cc ® o� . C? co W z c� A-20 f Jr DRAFT FOR D,St.!7SSJON PURPOSES ONl.y Paralleling the v previously ;;—Jted population growth from `i975 to 1980, the laity's housing stock also increased during this same timZ� period shown in Table A-6. 'the total number of housing u lts increased by /2,7V,nits between .1970"and 1975 and increased by another 5369 un,�ts' through 1980.`�4n the, period from 1980 -through 1984, the grawth rate 14gv-2d, as a reflecti6n of the national eFInomic''recession, but picked up again in 1985 with �.he greatQst increase in the number of new units, 12,259, 'occurring between 1985 and 1989. Overall, as, shown in Table A-7, th`�'City's housing has increased annually by an average rate of 7.7 percent 'sinS 1980, and has averaged 11.68 percent per year over the last four years. i I T'ABL AA-b' HOUSING, AND POPULATION GROWTH TRENDS � i� Y2 increase pn uiefion '/a increase 1970 5195 105,043 8.5% 1975 12,470 140% 26262 64% 1980 17,839 43% 55,260 111i% 1985 22,190 24% 65,695 19°to 1989 34,449 55% 105,292 60% z i Source: Federal'Census aad 5trsce Department of Finance "Y r, i, M A-21 z � DRAFT Td1BL,E A 7 FOP- QISCJSSION i'URFPOSES ONLY 0 HOUSING OCC� NCY AND VA,CLNCY RATE'TRENDS FROM 1931' 011 r `TOtBI %Increase Occubled 4 acynt% 1981 18,257` 2.3 17,424 4.56 1982 18,505 1.35 17,894 3.30 18,65E 0.81 18,05E 3.21 1904 19,205 2.94 18,563 3.34 1985 22,190 15.54 19,892 16.36" 1986 24,438 10, 3 22,664 Ii7.26 1987 28,949 18.45 2C,270 12.71 1988 31,665 9.28 29,'U 5.75 5'ti 1989 34,449 8. , 5 79 32391 97 4 Average Annual Percent Increase 7.74 Average Annual Percent Increase Over Last Four Years 11.68 Source; State Department of Finance SCAG estimates, contained in the 1982 Modified Growth Projection estimate that there would be a total of 44000 housing units in Rancho Cucamonga by the year 2000, However, as a result of the City's vacant land survey, as of December, 1989, it is estimated that there will be between 57,015 and 59,248 dwelling units constructed at build-out. These projections are based upon development occur,1ng at 50 and 75 percent of the allowable density ranges. `r A-22 r.' DRAFT rers-ons Per Household FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY' According to the>1980 :census \there were 16,983 licu,seholds in the City, or X_+., about 5,.5 percent of the County total The averaje numbet", of persons per houseold was higher (3.3) ir, the City than the 'Coounty,'12.82). Table A-3 shmws the,numberof persons per household ii the City and County for the last 10 years. 1s can beF seat he rate for tte ,"ity surd County has stayed fairly constant over this time 4riod. TABLE A-8 PERSONS PEA HOUSEHOLD, CITY AND COUNTY TRENDS MEMO t F, 1980 3.03 2.82, 1981 3.24 2.82 1982 3.32 2.87 1983 3.30 2. s 198411, 331 rs 1986 3.28 2.86 c 1986 3.25: 2.87 1987 3.17 2.83 1988 3.1' 2.82 1989 3.22 2.86 Source: State Department of-w inane A-23 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY However, SLAG estt-,natel� `that due to the aging of the population and decrease ` in tW average household size.of some ethnic groups that the regions averageAML household size will drop to 2.69 by the year 2010. As a,result, SCAG also predicts that household size for Rancho Cu camonga will: drop to 2.9 rersons pet- household. assuming a 5 percent vacancy rate, by 2010. Qrner'Renter Charstteristics The majority of the housip dnits in the City are single family type and ol" occupied. Figure A-6 depicts a breakdown of the ,percentage of-owner versus ` renter occupied j,Owlelltng units by structural type"r Of all renter occupied structures in the City in 1980 approximately'33 percent are single family detacf;ed`tanits, 13.6 percent are attached and those with 2 to 4 units in a building, 30.1 percent are structures, having 5 or more` units and 2.7 percent are mobile homes. For owner occupied structures, 91.l�percent are single family detached units. The distributions depicted in Figure A-6 shows a characteristic common to_all—communities, that single-.'amiiy detached units tend to be owner occupied and multiple family units renter occupied.' i Vacanc. Rai~es The 1980 Federal census did include some information on vacancy rates by dwelling unit type. According to the census, the City had an overall vacancy- rate of 4.8 percent, as shown' in Table_A-9. The vacancy rate for single family, both detached and attached u: t types, averaged 5.1 percent; while it averaged 4.5 percent for multiple family'anits. Mobile home unit types experienced the lowest vacancy rate of l percent. With the exception of the vacancy rate for mobile homes, these figures do not differ greatly from the:<= HUD vacancy st,ndards of 5 percent for single family and 3 percent for multiple fani:y. I E - A•24 DRAFT FOR DiSCUSSION PtaRPOSES ONIIII-Y The City's average vacancy rate from 1981 to 1989 is shown in Table A-7, as estimated by the State Deaartment of Finance. Vacancy rates tent to b4, reflective of new construction activity as the rates tend to decrease -during Periods of lew growth, as in. the years 1982 through 1984, and increase du�^ing periods of rapid_growth, as in the years of 1985 through 1987 whenthe average yearly increase of new dweT,,.,jng units averaged 14.6 percent. 'FABLE A-9 i VACANCY RATE BY UNIT TY?E AS' OF 1980 p-nR3-yjm bccul2led Units "r U&M—Units V—a(.'qY—R= r SF Detached 14,447 726�- 50/0 SF Attached 1:92 Se, 24% 2 Units 68 7 7% &4 Units 279 ;33 11% 5 or More Units 11085 28 3% Mobile Home 888 6 1% Source: 1980 federal Census fIncome Generally, households in Rancho Cucam_,rga are wealthier 'thanhose living in San Bernardino County proper. In 1980, Rancho Cucamonga ha& the highest median household income, $24,868, of all .37 utmnvn,—ies and in the uni,ncorpnrated areas .of the County. This is compared to the $17,463 median khousehold income for Ytn. County as a whole., The City had the third highest A-25 i DRAFT FOR 1�[SC`JSS1O''.%1 PURPOSES ONLY me�._:n family inrnpte, $25,731, aj;-compared to thN same group for 1980, Recent estimates provided by Williams ,r�tebol�,eck and Associates for 1989 indicate thii the C ty's median income, $07,l i6, has continuedto be;..higher than that of San Bernardino 'County $29,546, by a significant angunt. in .1980, the most prominent source of income was the standard wage or salary, :tth just over 50 percent of all income rncei+:ei by Rancho Cucamonga re-sidants earrdd by this means. the next most comon sour a for income is from interest and rent payments at 21.4 percent. Self-em..,,4oyed persons comprise approximately 6.9 percent of the';populatirin, whilM approximatel; 7.4 percet... and 10.6 percent of the population receivz*1 :conies from social security and public assistance, respectively, income 1e)41s in ralation to the incom:. saurr° for households within the City are gra4.(hically shown in Figure A-7. i I I r , A-25(/t r , FOR`bISCUSS rzposzs Aft ONLY I�1 L r CD r � .'1 T O.._ 1 1 co R7 N i0 p 'a V m 0 w � d A� C 0 U !RI r+. Q { 1 Q) q, L O a� c UJ 0 eo � ca c ! ca o LL m C, 0 ® O ® O CL Cp Lo wt cr) N `^ r o � I 0 I � A-27 DRAFT � FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Poverty level is>defintid by the Federal Census Bureau as less than 80 percent of the national median household income. `As of 1980, xapproximately 5.5 percent. (M7 persons) of the total I"bpulation of Rancho Cucamonga fell below the incme poverty level. This represented 4.6 percent of'the tptal number of ` i7 mil ies in the City. k Percenta0e of Income S;nent rh Housing 4 The 1980 census provided information on mortgage costs and rental payments for residents of Rancho Cucamonga. Thi's census data also!Abdicated the amount, - a and corresponding percentages, of household incomes which went'to pay for both rental and ownership housing and is shown in Figures A-8 and A-9 below. For both owners and renters, the citywide median monthly payment was $538 and $342 f- respc�cti vel y. AMk I A-28 ry �f ����� y/f j�h�i' • f r • N! C l 4 � N «Y z`ti 1 s t+J 3 .fffi vk-. 1 . � �. • r H 0 f1 ,F Figure A-9 FOR DnscUSS a P DRAFTRP Gross R&i It Pays��;rtts 1980 osEs ON 35 30 ---------= 25 7�20 22.7 16.9 15 10 I� 5 __ _ _ 5.2 k 0 � - < $100 $100- 99� $200-299 $30C--399 $4C,0-�99 $500+ MO91thly Payment Source: 1980 Census f Along with ether cost of iiving increases, the cost -of housing has gone up since 1980. In a buyer profile compiled by Great Western Real Estate, it was found that the median =,-i.hly payment of a new home purchased in Rancho Cucamonga in 1989 through their company was $1,200. This represents an increase of approximately 115 percent since 1980, A-30 DRA FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY In addition, in_a recent survey of 37 apartment projects completed by the Planning Division in January, 1990, it was found that rental payments in the City have also more than doubled since 1980. As shown in Table A-10,; one- bedroom units typically range in price from $450 to $725,,a month, while two bedroom units range from $550 to $795 a month, and three bedroom units range in price from $625 to $975 per month. As compared to the fair market rent schedule for the Riverside-San Bernardino MSA .used by HUD- in its Housing Certificate Program; $494 for a one-bedroom, $577 for two-bedroom, and $750' for a three-bedroom, rents in Rancho Cucamonga tend to be higher than the regional average:. While the ,general monthly mortgage or Pental payment range is important to know in terms of meetirV- housing affordability, it is 'more important to inspect the percentage of income that goes to pay for housing casts. 1 Amk TABLE A-10 SURVEY RESULTS OF APARTMENT RENTS ,AS OF JANUARY 1990 Unit Total Average Rent Cost Average � mm NuMbff dent S ROKQA Deposit S Bachelor 200 507 410-595 250 1 +1 BR 2799 568 450-725 250 2+1 BR 1209 643 550-750 300 2+2i3R 1848 702 565-795 300 3+2BR 437 818 625-975 400 Total Number of Units: 6493 Total Number of Complexes Surveyed: 37 Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division A-31 ,� ear E DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The 'percentage of a household's income sent on housing costs ,cart be a significant social economic indicator. The Federal Department of Housing and Uriaan Development has established as a guideline that,not more than 30 percent of the monthly gross income should- go for paying housing costs. The 1980 census data does not provide a separate ca�egory of those paying below 30 percent rather a category of 25 percent to 34 percent and a category of 35 percent and over was. calculated andris shown in Figures A-10 and A-11. Figure A-10 Owner Households Paying,,25%,,. Of Income or Greater on Housing of Households 100 91 80 ,74 73 Alk 60 -- _ 40 7 34 20 t3 $5 $5 9.9 $10 14.9 $15 19.9 $20s Income group (in Thousands) % Paying 25-34% % Paying 35%+ Source:1980 Census Amik A-^32 DRALFT Figure A-11 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Renter Households Paying 2% Of Income or Greater on Housing % of Households i00 87 63 80 6? 60 52 40 2 20 0 0 mom W `$5 $5 9.9 $10 - 14 9 m i9.9 $20+ Bncome>Group On 'Thousands) % Paying 25 - 34% % Paying 35%+ �f Source: 1980 Census Recent estimates provided by SLAG in the "Revised Regional Housing Needs Assessment" of December, 1988, indicated that there are a total of 5,879 lower income households in Rancho Cucamonga of which 3,069, or approximately 10 percent of the total number of households, pay more than 30 percent of their income for shelter. Of that number, 1,723 owners are overpaying and 1,346 renters pay more than 30 percent. The data shows that a significant_number of lower income renter and owner households pay a disproportionate amount of their monthly income for housing. A}-33 h ✓� U 0", y DRAFT IV. HQ FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES:HOUSINGHOUSINGDEMANDDEMAND ONL'it'' This section provides information or, the general need or demand for housing in the future. This topic is covered both on a regional and local level. The main factor affecting housing demand at the local level is expected to be the increase in employment base from both industrial and commercial developments. The following statements point out the highlights of this section. L -Rancho Cucamonga is expected to nave between 57,016 and 59,248 dwelling, units at build-out, representing an increase of between 655 and 71.9 percent from 1989.3 High employment growth from commercial and industrial development is expected to create' a demand. for 50,378 new workers of which between 5,894 and 15,113 are expected to live in Rancho Cucamonga. * Although currently a substantial percentage of residents currently do not live and work in Rancho Cucamonga, this trend shauld be improved as the City develops its industrial, commercial, and residential lands. * Providing housing which is affordable for the projected- employment base, so that more workers can live and work within the City, is desired. 3 In June of 1990, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council began a study to evaluate the City's residential land use mix in consideration of reducing the number of multiple-family units anticipated at build- out. Impazts that could result from the reduction of vacant, uncommitted multiple-family zoned land would be'a reduction in the amount of higher-density multiple-family type of units, as well as n a overall ve all reductio n in the. total f number of units at build-out. An estimated reduction of between 4,535 to 4.955 total units, which would be approximately an 8 percent reduction in the current projected number of dwelling units at build-out, could result if the � Cit y s current anticipated build-out unit mix of 64 percent single family/36 percent multiple family is revised to achieve a 75 percent single family/25 percent multiple family mix. A-34 - �q DRAFT Regional Housing Demand iFOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) prxpares regional growth management forecasts for the Southern California regions, its subregion, as wel. 'as-for individual communities on a;periodic bases. ',n the 1989 Growth Management Plan, (G14P), SCAG attempt''s to address housing, m,,,_ ility and air quality through predicted growth patterns of jobs and housing Lhroughout its region. The GMP indicates that an improved job/housing balance,' (a shift of new jobs to housing-rich areas and of new housing to job rich areas), will help reduce further congestion and help improve f_�ir quality in the region. As stated by SCAG in the GMP, "Jobs and housing ai`,,.in balance when an area has enough employment opportunities for most of the people who live there and enough housing opportunities for the people who work there. The region as a whole is then, by definition, balanced." t � In the GMP, SCAG predicts that the `rousing demand of the region will continue to grow. In fact, the GMP predicts that',the population of-the region as whole will increase 34 percent from 1988 to 2010 and that a dgShk 1San Bernardi,. ` County will grow by 118 percent by Che year 2010. In addition, SCAG predicts that the West San Bernardino Valley will have the second largest absolute increase in population of any subregion; With its fast growing population, the West San Bernardino Valley was-estCmated to have a Jobs/housing balance of .99 for 1984, which indicates-a la-gcr portion of housing over jobs., However, SCAG forecasts indicate that the number of jabs will increase faster than housing thereby resulting in a modified Job/housing ratio of 1.16 by the year 2010, which will bring the subregion close to the ideal regional ratio of. 1.22. Local Housing Demand The major factor which will af;?act the demand for housing in the City is the expected employment growth in the commercial and industrial sectors, which also has an impact on the Community`s jobs/housing balance. Based on SCAG's A-35 S //(J rl DkAFT FOR DISCUSSPON'puRAOSE S ONLY r recent Draft City P~ 'jections (which are not adopted ,figures,, but are intended \` r for planning purpoS,' ) of March, 1990, Rancho`Cusamonga was considered to be �- job rich with an estimated jobs/housing balance of 1.004in 1987, which is r projected to increase to 1.805 at build-out.. It is clear that the'subregional ratio will be improved by way of increased employment growth in Rancho Cucamonga. During the next 20 to 30 years, the industr-al and commercial areas in the City will generate a demand for approximately-50,378 housing units in the area as sbbwn in Table A-11. This data is based on a study o•." square footage growth potentialof the existing vacant, developable commercial and industrial designated lands. Assuming a capture rate6 that will range from 11.7 percent (currently existing) zo 30 percent (which is the City's goal) of locally generated. employees, this will result in a housing urit need in the City of between 5,894 to 15,113 units respectively. Assuminzg�t4\,Ci l,y's .°Jmil of a 30 percent capture rate_. is achieved and that build-out will occur i approximately 25 years (2015). this translates into an average annual housing unit need of 605 dwelling units. % III 4 Jobs;Housing ratio lased on the number of occupied households in 1987 estimated by the Department of Finance to be 25,270. Number of jobs for 1987, based on recent SCAG figures, estimated a total employment of 25,338. Total employment defined as total number of people who work in the City, but may live elsewhere, as well as in the City. 5 Job/Housing balance based upon the City's build-out population and employment projections p J o s with housing estimated at 55,225 based on a 62.5 percent density and 5 percent vacancy rate, and total employment at 99,898, which is the estimated 1987 employment for the City, 25,338, plus the projected build-out employment shorn in Table A-11. 6 fapture rate refers to the percentage of persons employed in the licdustrial and commercial sectors in Rancho Cucamonga who also have the opportunity to live in the City. The current capture rate is bared upon a survey of local employees shown in Table A-5. A-36 F Go co O .�" r Ci �. CD U) y O C J v of Im r tS� C tC?Q toCV La p o r s 1l !c uj COo o u�� �i CM © N M 4 ¢ - =° 0 Q N tD iv E _ N E, a U p 28 W O o O o LU w N aro r co N CD m N � � N a Lo m12 ca mi z C r r ® E � P m m = J o �h� o O ® M C W N i11 rM y 32 �E m LAJN CO 0 ® 0 . 0 m C g. � o � � Cc tmCD M co m o A 9 "�-ai W W c CD.r- eo c y C3 CL ca c� m ,- � � a o C o m e W m CM IL E ¢, o is e� W c o U. m c�i � a`. CL . R-37 DRR-L'T` > FOR DIPCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY }..) Based upon the number of housing units anticipated at build-out, there appears to be sufficient capacity available to meet the housing needs of locally generated employees. The City's housing stock is expected to. increase between 23.683 to 24,799 units from 1989 (34,449 ut'ts) to build-out (between '57,016 and 59,248 units) for an annual increase of between 947 to 991 units, as compared to the 605 units needed. As a step in determining tha viability of making an effort to increase the capture,rate, the City will make an economic study of�, ancho Cucamonga's major employers on an annual basis. As part of this study, concentration will be given to current industrial and, commercial employee;sal-ary ranges. From this Projected employee incomes will be estimated and compared to housing costs for the City. - It is hoped that thi,5 study can identify the maximum realistic capture rate for the community. Establishing a realistic capture rate has two objectives. Tht'firz`' is to provide employment and adequate housi- for persons who wish to work and live in this area. The second is to provide employment and 'housing In proximity to one another so commuter patterns are lessened, thus having a beneficial domino effect on air quality, transportation"networks. public transit, and general energy efficiency. The trip to work is one of the significant factors affected by an increased capture rate. According to the 1980 census, more than 55 percent of the 19,230 persons who did travel to work had a traveling time of 30 minutes or' more. Figure A-12 graphically shows the commuting times for workers over the age of 16 who lived in Rancho Cucamonga and traveled to work in 1980. What is even more significant than this is the mode of transportation which is used. Figure A-13 shows the variety of transportatibn means available and the corresponding use by workers is 1980. The car was the dominant mode with 75.Z percent of the workers reporting that they drive alone. While it cannot be d'sputed that the car is the most convtinient means of travel', it is hoped that the amount of travel time needed from home to work, as rbhown io Figure A-12 can be decreased with a higher capture rate than the present estimated 11.7 percent. ;A-38 I DRAFT Figure Ar-'{2 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Distribution of Commute Time For Workers 16 Years+ Worlkern 96 Y 30 25 25.4 22.1 15 10.8 10 5 - 7 10 10 - 19 20 29 30 44 45 - 59 60} [Minutes of Commute Source: 1980 Census A-39 ati DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Figure A-13 Commuting Mode of Worker 16 Years Workers 96 80 75.2 60 L 40 i i 20 20.0 AOL 1 0 017, 1.2 1.7 1,2 Drive Alone Carpool Mass Ttenait Walk Other Work at Home Mode of Commute Source: 1880 Census I An objective of the Housing Element is then to provide housing opportunities to those people wishing to live and work in the community as well as help the air quality, reduce future congestion and increase general enr�gy efficiency. By achieving the highest possible capture rate of existing and anticipated workers, the City feels that this Objective canbe accomplished. A-40/ V. YACAtdT EAl1® Ii:'"?E!("'0{tY FOR DiscuSSiON PURPOSES ONLY The most prominent resource needed by a community in order to meet the demand for housing is vacant resideiitz-rl lands. This section describes this resource and includes descriptiof.s of vacant residential lands in the general City, the two planned communities and the sphere-of-iniiuence. .ands feasible for ii affordable housing are also discussed. The following t6ie6l points identify the highlights of this section: • As of January 1, 1990, the City has 2,533.74 acres of vacant, uncommitted, residential land'suitable for development within 4,he City of which 72E,81 acres or286 percent will allow a residential density of 8 dwelling units per acre or greater. * The total number of residential dni is in the`:.' ty will be approximately 57,016 to 59,248 units,at build-out which is expectnld to occur in 201.6, * Further growth in the area shown as the Planned Communities generally will pravde a variety of housing opportunities through the build-out period. ' i Ly e; A-41 Vacant ®RfA,FT tesidential Land rcc�F'OR DiSOL._,SJr0N =06RPOSES ONLY Within the City, there are approximately 3,281.46 aches of vacant and developable land in the eight residential districts. D: that total, 2,533.74 acres can be considered uncommitted as >there have been no applications for development submitted for these properties. The remaining 747.72 acres can be classified as committed, in that' as of December, 1989, applications for } Development rjview had been submitted for a total of 3,512 units, but had not been approved by the Planning Commission at that time. `tables A-12 and 13 identify the density range of each district and tni�- amount of uncommitted vacant land available in each category. Also shown \':s the f potential number of dwelling units which could be built assuming that the land is built-out at 50 percent, and 75 percent of the density range of each district (13,261'and 15,493 newu. is respectively). TABLE A-1 PROJECTED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FROM VACANT 'TWOM7 I17ED LAND FOR TIME ENTIRE CITY AT BUILD-OUT Vacant Uncommitted Units at W1,; units st 7510/6 AMON D-easIbLEmpa Qans:it! Range F + ER (.1-1du/ac) 120,33 60 90 HR (.1-2dulac) 118.91 118 177 VL (1-2du/ac) 1062.31 1057 1585 L (2-4du/ac) 146.85 441 514 LM (4-8du/ac) 360.50 2163 2524 M (8-14du/ac) 587.57 6463 7345 MH(14.24du/ac) 93.29 1772 2006 H (24-30du/ac) 5 .- 6z Totals 253,4.74 13,261 15,493 i 9 A-42 z -11 ct DRAFT TABLE A»93 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY PROJECTED KNIT DEVELOPMENT EY PLANNINC AREA , GENERAL CITY Vacant Uncommitted Units at 8'°� Units at 760/6 Iyv'B ' \`;g Density glingg HR (.1 2du/ac) 118.91 118 1?7 VL. (.1-2dutac) 33418 132 499 L (2-4cu/ac) 89.06 ' 177 207 LM (4-8dulac) 10.45 63 73 M (8-14du/a ) 94.24 1037 1178, MH(14-24di.dac) ;3.98, 266 301 H (24-30Cu/acj Totals 630.E 1993 2435 E"1WARDA Ask ER (.1-idulac) 120.36 60 90 VL (.1-2du/ac) 562.73 560 340 L (2-4cutac) 87.79 263 30 LM (4-8du/ac) 264.82 1589 1854 M (6-14cu/ac) di.3? `r3917. Totals 1277.07_,` 5127 6108 TERRA VISTA LM (4-8du/ac) 26e.23 157 134 M (8-14du/ao) 6'.98 682 775 MH(14-24cu/ac) 54 36 1033 -1169 H (24-30du/ac) 29.74 Totals 172.31 2675 2975 Continued... t.. A-43 1o.K� • DRAFT FoR DISCUSSION FURPCSSS ONLY TABLE A-13 CONTINUED PROJECTED UNIT-o®EVELOPMENT BY PLANNING AREA VICTORIA Vacant ^s Uncommitted Units at 50% Units at75% Law ACEMM 3sIt3P Rgu a Density fRaaca_e LM (4,,'8du/Ac) 59.00 354 413 10."(d14du/ac) 189.98 2090 2375 MH(14-24du/ac) 24.95 474 53S. H (24-30du1ac) s14,21 Totals 288.14 3302 3729 ANNEXED LAND Hid (.1-2du/ac) 0 „0 0 VL (.1-2dular) 165.40 164 246 Aft L (2-4dulac) 0 0 tf f I-M (4-8du/ac) g "_ Totals 165.40 165 947 TOTALS 2533.74 13,261 15,493 A-4a DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AWL The potential number of units in the CYty at build-ou, was estimated by- combining the figure for potential units (1',261 and 15,493) from vacant Land with the January 1, 1990. Department of Finance estimates for existing swellings (36,339). Added to this figure was the number, of units 'approved by -:he Planning Commission in 1989 (1,454), the number of units far protects approved before 1988 that have 'not,.had building permits issued `yet (1,229), and the,estimated number of units for projects currently in the review process (3,518). Finally, subtracted from this total are the number of units demolished within this time span (8) for an estimated total number of dwelling units at build-out ranging from '57,016 to 59,248 as shown in Table A-14. TABLE A-14 ESTIMATED TOTAL N1lII9 BErt OF HOUSEHOLDS AND POPULATION AT BUILD-OUT NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS. Single Multiple Mobil® mr 2ens[tm F€omily t=amil11 HoM2s IQW No.of units estimated 34,205 21,848 963 57,016 Population 157,079 Z§%Density No.of units estimated 35,256 23,029 963 59,248 Population 163,228 Assuming a 5%vacant-,:,ate and 2.9 persons per household. A-45 :..: ,. -.per / DRAF F'OR DISCUSSION PURPOSES O►N.Ly It should also be noted that within the City's unincorporated spf;ere-of influence there are approximately 7,396 acres of which 2,044 are designatedly 11 for residential development. TMe",remaining 5,352 acres'ha.vQ been designated as either open space, utility corridor, or as flood control' Taking into account the City's newly adopted Hillside Development 0 111i nance, it is estimated that the total number of dwelling units which could be built in the sphere area is 2,948. Table A-15 provides the City's estimate of,; the number of duelling units to be developed from July 1, 1989 to 1994. Between 9169 and 11,916 units°are anticipated to be developed-in this time period resulting in an annual housing production of between 1,834 and _2,383 units. This was based on the existing development ,which occurred thrcugh January 1990 the number 'of residential units currently in review, as well as future new development estimates'based on vacant uncommitted land and growth projections.` Given the current economic climate,,, a projection of future new development over the next five years indicates that growth will not occur at the same rote as in the preevious five year period from 1984-1989. 'this 'growth projection has been based on trend analysis, as weil as on discussions with local developers, real estate brokers, and market analysts familiar with Rancho Cucamonga. As a result, shown in Table`A,,,15, staff has developed estimates of new development occurring at 50 percent find 75 percent of the previous growth rate as explained below. The first step in developing a growth PI ojection was to look at the growth which occurred in the, last five years fo= 1984 to 1989. This was Aone by calculating the percentage amount of ,lar`d that had developed in each land use c7*egory, which are as follows: Estate 'Residential, D percent; Hillside Residential, 31.2 percent Very Lnw Residential, 53.9 percent; Low Residential, 87.8 percent.; Low-Medium' Residential, 72.4 percent; tedium Residential, 44.9 percent; Vedium-HiOn Residential, 73.8 percent; and High esidential, 6S.9 percent. A-46 -s DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION[ PURPOSES ONLY Given the current economic climate, it is clear that development in the next five years is not likely to occur at thw,same rate as the previous five years and, therefore, develo.-aent has been estkated as occurring at either 50 or 75 percent of the previous rate. This was calculated by taking percentages of the previous rate for each land use category to develop the modified five year growth rates. for example, the previous five year rate for the .hillside Residential district was 31.'? percent. Taking 50 percent of that is 15.6 percent, and 75 percent of tone rate is 23.4'percent, These codified rates were then imiltiplied by the.`, amount of uncammitted vacant acreage, as of January 1, 1990, in each land use category to estimate the amount;of land that`. would develolkJn the next five years. Finally, then, the number of units to be developed.-in the next fiye years were estimated as occurring at a portion of each 'rand 'use density range. Therefore,",,for each land use category and for each of the possible ',growth rates, development was estimated at occurring at 50 and "75 percent of each land use density range. ,For example, the Hillside Residential designation has a possible density range of 0.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre. Fifty percent of this range is .995 dwelling units per acre while 75 percent of the range is 1,':925 dwelling units per acre. 1 } A-47 r s DRAFT '.FM'DISCUSSION PURE?Q ra Cllmi v AM TABLE A-15 POTENTIAL OMIT DEVELOPMENT'THROUGH 1994 Development at 5"t'-of Previous frivelppment at 76%of Previous Grosrtil In Lest 5 Years(ecMM* G awfh in Laffi 5 Years isbre±s] Land Uncommitted 50%ofDensity 75%of Density 50%ofDensity 75%ofDensity Uss dUac y[1/9() heft un1141 Renaefunitsl Range(Units) Rana Iunits! / ER (.1-1) 120.36 0 0 0 0 HR (.1-2) 118.91 18 27 27 41 VL (.1-2) 1052.31 284 427 427 640 L (2-4) 146.85 193 225 290 338 LM (4.8) 360.50 783 913 1174 1370 'M (8-14) 587.57 1447 1644 2176 2473 MH(14-24) 93.29 646 731 969 1096 H` (24-30) 43.95 412 521 55 3761 4379 55N 6508, Units constructed from „ 7/1/89 to 1/1l90*' 1890 1890 1890 1890 Proposed units currently in review Alft as of 1/1190- 3518 A51g Estimated five year t projection 1989-1994 9169 SIM 10,992 11.916 D svegr.xnern esihaated at'a Darnea49a of the Prov€ozrs gmwihdWe4om"W between 1984 and 19a9,and is based on sesa of urxomnutted tand "EStim: sd from Deper9rr�'af P yearly esllr mtes •••Plana;9 Division A4okatid`)Loy P,-48 i ' DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY (Lands Suitable for Affordable Housing In addition, to the noted vacant residential areas lards ads suitable for affordable housing have been identified by the City. 'Wi`,�hin the two planned + communities of Terra Vista and Victoria, a commitment was made whereby 15 percent of the total number of units will be made economically;available to low and moderate income families, In both developments, the affordable housing units have and will continue to include mixes of attached and detached dwellings. These units have been to be dispersed throughout the planned communities to avoid over-concentrations of low and moderate income families in any one area. In addition to the planned communities, other lands could become available and feasible for the develo"rent of affordable housing as shown in Map A-2. The provision of lower cost may be achieved as a result of state mandated density bonuses or in conjunction with the City's Senior Housing Overlay District. Affordable unit construction may also be ac4i'eved as a result of the City's Redevelopment Agency's 20 percent set aside funds. Discussion of the methods and programs to encourage, the develop 4ht of afforda�11 housing, including aid for homeless persons, are contained elsewhere in t�� s chapter LJ and in,the Element itself and its corresponding five year programJ'� i; A-4g c z �z O L < UZ a� !+' �/ e�c < si ALA 5 ZJ � 'S'. W 9 0. O 2 g T � W � W LLI ? ®G < BEcn C.. ^0ir \l 1 U co .•ems �. ��, ..ass .U_ - ci w � !� #UAW - ', o L Ae-il L4 01rOL7R -- A!• - WRifll. Ole, am 0 a �-- fn Ewl U !r �r DRAT FOR DISCUSSIQjq pURPOSES ONLY VI. HDUSIO AVAILABILITY This section provides an overview of the factors contri)uting to housing availability such as recent and future construction,actti ,",II housing prices;'—, and the *esidential capacity of the two planned communiti(k,. The following highlights are included in this secf1on: Since 1984 there have been a total of 15,5\�6 new dwelling units constructed which is-an k percent increase 9'n the City's housing stock. The two Planned Communities of Victoria and Terra Vista combined provide almost 460 acres of vacant, uncommitted residential land which will provide a wide range of housing types and densities. * Development incentives in tha Planned Communities have resulted in the provision of affordable housing units. Approximately 52.7 percent of the total units completed in Terra Vista since 1984 were available to low or moderate income househol,ds-, i A-51 i DFR�AE"T Recent Construction FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Since 1970, the number of dweliinM units in the City of Rancho Cucamonga has increased over 660 percent from 5,195 to 34,449 units. As sha slot in Figure A-14, two periods of rapid increa;_;� have occurred since 1970. The first occurred between_1975,;and 1979 when 7475 units were constructed, while the second has continued from 1984, when the number of new dwelii-ag units completed per y,,ar!jumped to over 2,000. In the last five years since 1984, there have been 6-total of 15,566 new dwelling units constructed. In the period from 1979 to 1983 the number of new units dropped considerably, reflective of the national economic climate of the time. The fewest number of units constructed in any one year was in 1982 when only 247 units were built and the high was in 1986 when 4,347 units were added. As illustrated in Table A-16, which shows the construction activity over the last 11 98 ears 1979- Y ( I 9), 71 ;percent (14,181) of the new units were single family dwellings, including single family detached and attached structures (including townhomes). Muiti-family dwellings or apartments made up the remaining 29 percent (5,748 units). Based upon the existing vacant residential land remaining in the City, in the coming years a majority, or 69 percent, of the new housing stock will. be of a multi-family nature, which is defined as densities,of 8 dwelling units to the , acre or greater such as condominiums, townhoPes, and apartments. These figures indicate that the City's growth is following a standard pattern of residential development in expanding urban areas. That is, the predominance of single family development occurs early in community 'nevelopment to be followed by multi-family type infill. I, A-52 46-/a CAJ it! co 0 03 a ce rn z c" ,- o a 00 �\n! { yf �. 00 cm V- C ' r� Q � t0 s� n 00 CIO }— ca co E CY U � m (CS c a e—� co tU N N C o •2 co co h . LL aC A ' ca 0 co 1, A-53 ..l +. co \ O z Go cm Q v " P N °'- W N O m w Ln C'J co c W L T N co� N F.a Ln 0 N n O N N c -o M 0 r Nn to N co r N LO to Sp M W ��n Co N M V. r N O M°' Lrn � co o N U. T� r �. zLU cr. CIO hcli CV) �P C*4 0 c e- IT Imo- NO C� N P _ . to r c tD N tq LO =' `E 1 W Q LL ( Os QWo 0 v5W E a C J fn C 0C t4 G«. _ ® W LL O to l�II C O r�o A-54 Cost Associated with 6iosssin DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Based upon information compiled by TRId *;aa1 Estate,''. rket information Service, the average house price in Rancho Cucamonga for 1989 was $110.927. This figure includes new and resale condomir;ium and single family units. for the month of January, 1990, housi,Ig sales for new and resale homes in the Ontario, Upland, Chino, and Rancho Cucamonga area showed an average sales price of $211,537 as shown in TabIr, A-17. In this same period the average price by zip code varied from $151,818 in the Etiwanda area (91739). to a high of $236,540 for the north Alta Lama area (91701). TABLE A-1R AVERAGE HOME PRICES BY ZIP CODE AS OF JANUARY 1990 ZIP Ayemg Price 91;Ji $2Z6,540 91730 $181,097 91739 $151,818 Overall Annual Average home Price For All Three Zip Codes For 19$9•• $170,927 tnc;ildes thi3 sa`s of new and existing single-family tames and condominiums.during tN month of January 1930. ••includes the sale of new and existing single-far illy twcras and condominiums during the entire year of 1989. Source: TRW Real Estate Information Servic : . A-55 -- tt� � Z ttl ® c w On a� 0 ® r W) 0 co P— � ca a Z) ® N pp �6% 0 Q 33 *> co, z z _N u, r o 01 to i � a�a o 0_ cr) n iCO 1 r `....� On iju �. IV ® f I *a* ' H I e:� t 1 i r- aewa■ /niaa 1 aaparaa � �� i i i 1 1 "W—n i I t 1 1 I t�t� m r 1 I , t'st�H i t h 1 1f� 131 DRAFT' FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. ' Map A-3 shows the average price per zip code for January of 1990. Prices in, the northern Alta Lomas area-" considerably higher than other areas of the ,,mes and minimum 20,000 square foot lots. In City because of the larr, comparison to prices in Rancho Cucamonga, the average sales price for a home in San Bernardino County was $137,048 for this same time period. According to the Inland Finaire West Board of Realtors, the average cost of i resale single family housing in Rancho Cucamonga for 1989 was $162,676. This is a considerable increase over the aver^age-value of non-condominium housing in 1980 which was $89,M am.'-ding to the Federal Census Bureau. The price of new and resale homes is expected to continue to increase in the ` coming years. Although the extent of the increase is hard to Judge as housing pricing, like many rther goods, is dependent on economic factors including inflation and interest rates. Other costs associated with homie building in E Rancho Cucamonga, such, as permit fees and T-nd costs, are identified in the governmental and market constraints section of this Technical Appendix. Agkk Short Terms Projected Types and Tenure of housing a. Multi-Family: (Including condominiums, townhomes and apartments) As of December 31, _1989, there were a total of 2,183 multi-family units/lots which had been submitted for review to the Planning Division but which had not yet received any form of approval. A total of 347 multi-family enits were approved,4y the Planning Commission in 1989. In addition there were 3 multi-family tracts recorded in 1989 for a total of 488 units. b. Single-Family: As of December 31, 1989, there were a total of 1,335 need single-fx,lily units that had been submitted for project review which had not received approval from the Planning Commission. Additionally, a total of '1,107 new single family units (including new tract subdivision with or without design review-) had been approved by the Planning Commission in 1989. There were 19 new tracts recorded in 1989 for a total of 1,202 units. A-57 I LM DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY c. Second units: In accordance with State legislation,, in 1983 the City' Aft I approved an ordinance allowing for second dwelling units to be located on developed lots in the single family residential districts. The ordinance permits 640 square feet maximum "granny flats" which are temporary/removable structures. In 'addition; the ordinance permits permanent second dwelling units up to 640 square feet in size. To date, two applications for second dwelling units have been approved. The first was approved in November, 1985 and the second in June of 1989. A third application has been filed and is pending review. d.- PoLile Homes; There art• currently 8 mobile home parks in the City with a total of 963 spaces as of January 1, 1989. Mobile horse parks are conditionally permitted in all residential districts. In addition,, individual mobile hones on permanent foundations are currently permitted in all residential districts, except the Very Low` Residential District, subject to Design Review and current development standards, However, new state legislation (SB 2827) approved in 1988 which amended Section 65852.3 of the Government Code, deleted sections of state Taw which formerly allowed jsr-isdictions' Aft to restrict manufactured homes to specific residential districts. In effect, this legislation required jurisdictions to allow manufactured housing in all residential districts. Ps a result, the City will need to review the current provisions-of the Development Code applying to mobile homes in order to ensure compliance with the new legislation. Planned Cmwnities Two large-scaled planned communities, Terra Vista by Lewis Hones, and Victoria by The William Lyon Company, totaling nearly 3,200 acres of land were approved by the City in 1983 and 1981 respectively. Both planned communities provide a mixture of residential, commercial, and public land uses. Residentially planned property in Terra Vista equals approximately 780 acres, while Victoria :has approximately 956 acres of residential property. A-58 j e FOR ®I5'GUSS® PURPO r' 1 The distribution of vacant residential land :in the pllanneed-CiM by, district is shown on Table A-13. As of December, 1989, both planned communities had a total of 460 acres` of vacant lmcoimmitted residc,ptial property. Of that total uncommitted acreage, 18.5 percent"(85 acres) permits a density ;range of 4 to 8 dwelling units 'per acre while the r;amaining"bi percent (375-acres) is in the 8 to 30 dwelling unit per acre density range. As of December, 1989, new project applicationswithin both Planned Communities for 47 units in the 4 to 8 range and 1,722 units in the 8 to 30 density ranges were in the current review process. It should be noted that throughout its development since 1981 and as a result of recent amendments, the total number of units, proposed for the Victoria Pl anned Community has been reduced from 7,577 to 6,271. One significant reason for the reduction is the fact that a larger;imount of lower density, single family product has been developed than originally planned,aod conversely that the number of higher density, multi-family units has been icduced. However, a signficans portion of those ;single family -unfits wore; considered very affordable at the time that they were devselcped and provided a significant AM portion of first tim how purchases for the area. Both Terra Vista and Victoria have incentives to provide 15 percent affordable housing for low and moderate income households. A low income family is;; defined as one whose income is below 80 percent of the area median family income, whereas a moderate income family is from 80 percent to 120 percent of the area median income. It was intended that these units be disbursed throughout the various neighborhoods within the planned communities. For each unit provided by the developers which is affordable to low and moderate income I households, the City shall grant a bonus of one additional unit, up to 15 percent of the maximum density permitted in the planned communities, if requested. In Terra Vista this incentive could proviAe up to 1,200 affordable units and in Victoria 941, affordable units at 'build-out. i A-59 J:SF-['`- !"r OR DISCUSSION FLJRr 0ScS ONLY A study conducted of the affordable housing unit production in Terra Vista, by City staff in October of 1986 with a second study conducted by the Lewis Deve!Dpment Company in 1940, found that 52.7% 'of the total units completed since 1984 have been available to low or moderate income households, as shown,-- in Tabl a°A-18. While there has been periodic monitoring of affordable housing in'`lerra Vista, there has been no comparable monitoring of Victoria. Based on verbal information from The Lyon Company and knowledge of previous selling prices„it is very likely that a fair proportion of the homes, sotj in the first years of . Victoria's development were affordable. "\`,,However, the exact number and distribution of affordable units provided in the Victoria Planned Community are unknown. Therefore, in "order to determine the '`:amount, it will be necessary for the City to develop a review and monitoring program. As part of,-,) this program, previous sales of ynits in. Victoria will be reviewed to determine the number conveyed to low and moderate ` some households. In addition, periodic monitoring of newly developed, nits should occur in order to ensure that at least 15 percent of the total housing units will be affordable to low and moderate income households. EM i 1' I. 1: i i' A-60 16 -/. 1 e a cc co cli 0 Co Ln co - ^ Cq -(n N N Y? N G LU q0q IL Ix ii O R o O E) r N S�J P > N W, 0 � CD LL O G `a LL c m coa � P w P V! f~J3 co e e» a cc cli W } a' F p p c 2 � ® 9 N �, _ � � LL. 0 m O � IrIc"o, N 4 OC •m 040 CC .. A-61 DRAFT Condominium Conversions FOR DISCUSSION PURP0,SES Oly!_Y The City adopted a Condominium Conversion 'Ordinance in 1980 which limits the number ofmulti;-family rental units converted to ownership type. The intent "r of the ordinance is to: (a) Encourage a balanced supply of rental and ownership housing In the community and a variety of choices of tenure, type, price, and location of 4�;us'Tng. (b) Maintain and encourage a supply of affordable housing, both ownership and rental, for loss and moderate income persons and families, ana (c) Promote the residential stability :and quarity of the community by developing neighborhood identity, discouraging displacement of residents, and facilitating ownership opportunities for the community. The maximum number of units converted in one year is based upon the number of new apartments added to the housing stock in the previous year. The ordinance also provides for legal notification of tenants of the lowner's intent to convert, tenant right ,of first refusal to purchase a unit, and establishes requirements for physical upgrades of the subject property to assure compliance with current City standards, To date, one project, totaling 328 units, was approved in 1989 for conversion from apartments to condominiums. However, the owner does not intend,to sell the units immediately, but continue to rent them. This particular project was originally designed to condominium standards and therefore did not require any physical changes to the project. A-62 !,r DRAFT Farr Nixosing r FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY To promote fair housing, the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga ,contracts with the Inland Mediation Board. The Board is, a non-profit organization which helps citizens (both tenants and landlords.) resolve housing disputes without the r need for costly and time-consuming court action. The Board trains connturyity volunteers in the art of negotiating, who in turn conduct mediation sessions between parties. The Board also provides mortgage default counseling, and assists with complaints regarding housing discrimination and refers cases to the Distrir.y" nffice of the Department of Fair Emp1,,.,Trent and ;?ausintu, and conducts housing workshops to inform the community of tenant/landlord rights and responsibilities under State and Federal haws with respect to fair housing. From July, 1984 to June, 1989,'Inland Mediation Board handled l,ESZ==nquiries from Rancho Cucamonga. Since July of 1987, 54 of those calling were further counseled and 15 complaints of discrimination were filed. In the last four years, the number of cases has increased by an average of 17.8 percent a year. It is likely that the number of inquiries will continue to increase over the next five years, in conjunction with the increase in population. Senior Shared Housing This program has been in effect for three years and is aimed at lower incc=ne senior citizens. The objective is to provide counstA ing and referral services to assist seniors in managing their homes and remaining independent.,%-Inland Mediation counsels seniors on their options and matches people who`. Ji to share their hone. However, so far, Inland Mediation has found the options counseling to be more valuable than the actualmatches.. Fran July of 1985 to June of 1989, a total of 77 seniors were counseled and 4 persons assisted with a match. The City plans to continue this program and will encourage Inland Mediation to further promote its availability in hopes of reaching an increased number of seniors. A-63 DRAFT Density Bonuses FOR. D1S,CUSSION PURPOSES ONLY As the need for lower income housing has become an increasing concern in California, the State iegi'slature has required local governments to o':fer the private sector incentives for the development of affordable housing. Recent amendments to State lax (Section 65915 of the Government Code), as a result of AB 1259, have strengthened the requirements for provision of these incentives. The revised legislation requires. :that incentives be provided. if- 20 percent of the units are reser�!e!Jor 166-,,r income; if 10 percent of the units are reserve J for very lo%4 income; or if 50 percent are reserved for senior citizens. The law no longer aliows credit for provision of units for moderate income. The basic provisions require that cities grant a 25 percent density: bonus over the otherwise maximum allowed density and at least one other incentive; or, instead of the density bonus, provide other incentives of, equivalent financial value. In exchange, the units shall be maintained at the affordable revels for a specified length of time (10 years if a city does not l � 19 grant one additional incentive, 30 years or longer if full incentive; are granted). In 1989, the City removed from the Housing Element a provision to limit the density bonus to 25 percent. Prior to the new legislation, the City prescribed the conditions of the incentives through the use of development agreements which were specific to the projects needs and characteristics. However, new State law requires local jurisdictions to adopt an implementing ordinance to specify the method i of providing developer incentives. As a result, the City has added the development of a density bonus ordinance to it,,p; '1.990-91 wor% program schedule. Mortage Revenue Bond Programs This program which R intended to provide financing opportunities to either encourage developers'-Of multi-family rental housing; to offer at least 20 percent of their units to lower income households 'o assist first time low and moderate income buyers by o0ering below rate mortgages. Aft AMR A-64 1 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION, PURPOSES ONI_,C A. Single-Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds By cooperation agreement with the Rancho u G camonga Redevelopment :Agency, the San Bernardino County 5ccnomic and Community Development Department sells mortgage bonds to provide below market rate 30 year, fixed mortgage financing for fil-st time home buyers whose income does not exceed 80 percent of the area median income. Additionally, there are restrictions on the initial sale price of the homes financed under the program. In recent years, the cost of new housing being„built. in Rancho'\,tucamonga,has exceeded the price limits of the programs, although resale homes`are also eligible. As a result, in-1989 the program assisted 3 homes, of which the average household income was $40,644 and the average purchase price was $107,657. B. Multiple-roily Rental Mortgage Revenue Bond Program Also by cooperation with the County of San Bernardino rental projects in Rancho Cucamonga with 20 percent of the units restricted to 'lower income households, earning less than 80 percent of the' area me±flan,intome, may be funded with county multiple-family rental -revenue bonds. According to-the MW County, approximately 355 units have been funded through this program since 1983. Use of these funds is then subject only to market conditions and the developer's ability to develop and rent the units. Redevelopment Agency A. 20 Percent Set Aside Funds Prior to 1989, the City's Redevelopment Agency did not have a consof0ated housing strategy for use 'OZ its 20 percent set aside hinds. The money was primarily funneled into capittl improvement projects which would then provide benefit to future developers of multi-family housing. The Agency had also provided direct incei.tives tr one affordable housing project, the Heritage ._-k apartments for Seniors, by contributing approximately $80,0D0 towards the r,st of off-site improvements. However, such uses of the 20 percent set aside A-65 DRAF' FOR DISCUSSIQN PURPOSES ONLY funds are no longer allowed as a result of a lair suit filed against the City AMIL by the Western Center for Law and Poverty. In 1989, tWf.ity reached agre7ent with the Western Center for Law and Poverty on the uses of the City's Redevelopment Agency afiordable housing fund. The agreement proscribes how fund revenues will be used to provide' affordable; housing by establishing four incdte levels eligible for housing assistance from the fund: Level I Families earning less: than 35 percent. of the area median income, adjusted for family size. Level 11 Families earning between 36 and 4S percent of the area median income, adjusted for family size. Level III Families earning between 46 and 60 percent of the area awdian income, adjusted for family size. Level IV Families earning betj;,--;n 61 and 90 percent of the area median incew adjusted for family size. As a result, the City is in the process of developing an Affordable Housing ` Strategy to carry cut the provisions of the Agreement. As_part -of=the development of the Strategy, the amity hired a consultant teas ►r:,'.se members y included David Paul Rosen and Associates, the housing and tare law firm of ( 6oldf,rb and Lipman, and the real "estate economics consulting firm of Williams Suebelbeck and Associates, Inc. In addition, a Citizens Noising Task Force was formed, whose., members included representatives from the Rancho Cucamonga Chaiber of Commerce, major Lenders, for-profit developers, neighborhood leaders, sensor citizens, and mobile Note park residents. A-�6' DRAFT Ft,R DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY To dater the Agency has prev*ded dioeet }neeRt}ves to eAe a€€erdabl•e heussng prejeetr the Hey#cage park ApartmeRts €er SeR#ersr The AgeRey saetr€bates approximately savogo towards the east of eff-s*te €mpwevemeRts for the P084eEtr Sueh uses of the , a:pereent set-as}de €ands are Re TeRgep allowed.. As a result, a Rumber of Row programs are surrently being examined €er use of the €ands .by she Ageney through developmeat of aR Affordable Meus}ng Strategyr Wader the terms of the Western se»ter Sett}emeRt AgreemeRts these €ands may be used eRly €er d#rest beRef*t to hous}Rg un}ts affordable to persoRsAfam*l*es of law ar moderate €Reemer The Agreement a}se de€gees the dfvis*eR of uR}ts between sped*e €Reeme eategeptesr Alt)ough no specif; programs .have been approved to date, a number are being examined as part of the Affordable Housing Strategy wMeh }s eurrently under devel-apmeRtr These and include thi, following: Creation of a focal non-profit Housing 'Development Corporation which would bec !^e an affordable housing developer in the community. Creation of non-profit Neighborhood Cooperatives to purchase existing homes, rehabilitate them and rent them to qualifying families. Creation of Mobile Nome Park Cooperative to purchase existing mobile home parks in order to stabilize rents and allow control of the parks by' "s residents. Land Banking The Agency has recently approved a "land banking" policy which allows the purchase of vacant property, suitable for development of affordable housing. This land is then held by the Agency until an appropriate development project is obtained for it. - Pursuing the acquisition of tax syndication as an additional source of i funding for affordable housing development. i Aff f , i A-67 FOR DISCUSSION PU'RPOSES ONLY As a result, prograW: shall'-be added to the Housing Element to require the development and sreplOwntation of the Redevelopment Affordable Housing,, StraV4 and to require`,that once the Strategy is completed:,-that the element be f'evised as necessary 'to ensure consistency 'with the affordable housing proijrm. B. !,Mortgage Revenue Bond Programs The Redevelopment Agency and the City have issued over $150 million in Mortgage Revenue Bonds since 1983. The program provides below-market interest rates for first-time home buyers whose incone does not exceed 120 percent of the area median income. Additionally, there 'are restrictions on the initial sa'e price of the homes financed u►.;_r the program; Approximately 760 homes have been financed under these programs. The feasibility of further mortgage bond programs is driven by the housing market. In "recent years, the price of ` the housing product in the City has exceeded the price"limits of the programs which is set by HUD an an annual basis. However, should the housing development industry express a need for this type of program, future issues could be sold. Mobile Hale Park Rentals Agreements By crutual agreement between the City and owners of the 8 existIng mobile home parks, a Mobile Home Park Accord was approved on January 1, 1985. The purpose of the:Accord is to protect the residents of mobile homes from unreasonable space rent increases, while at the same time recr)nizing the need for mobile home park owners to receive a just and reasotiable income to cover the costs of repairs, maintenance, insurance, employee services, additional amenities, and other operations, as well as a fair return on their investment. ToAate, the Accord has fulfilled its purpose by stabilizing rents and generally improving relations between residents and owners in the City. j I 'I f A-68 c DRAFT ~FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Provisions of the Accord require that the park owners shall meet a minimum'of once'a year with thrQ residenici�:committee of the park and shall also meet prior to affecting any alterations in 'service or changes to rules. In the event of a breach of contract or non-compl?Ance with the agreement, by the ow'her, the City shall act as an enforcement authority. Under terms of the accord, an owner may increase rents oncz a year or as based', upon specific factors such as change in_ utiliy fees, assessments or in the event of a capital project, one which exceeds a cost of.$10,000, is made within a park. Therefore, as lon¢.;as the Accord functions smoothly, end provided that-, {,n owner,is not in breach of the agreement, the City will. not enact any fc ^of regu*;ition that imposes restrictions or controls• an owner p abil isy to increase or decrease mobile home space rents. 1�,f A-69 DRAFT VII. HOUSING J4SSISTARCE NMS FOR DI CUSSION PURPOSES ONLY This portion of the technical appzndix refers to t'Je estimated existing and projected households that: need some form of housing assistance. Twol.,major sources•bave been used tci complete this section; the Regional Housing+ Needs Assessment (RHiiA) orepared by _SCAG . A the Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) prepared by the City for th f,;; Ce.Munity Development Block Graa—c-i`bBG" Program. The following are the highlights associated with this section. The Regional Housing Needs Assessment shows the current lower inrome households 0;:'<are paying disproportionately high percentages of their income: on housina costs. - ` * According to the SCAG/RHNA, approximately.6s414 5,444, or 13 percent of the total housing units construe#»d by 1992 should be -affordable to households 'earning 120 percent or less of the established median c, income. * By meeting the goals Lf the Regional Housing Needs AsseS�tme'nt (RHNA) ( and the Housing Assistance Pla,. (4AP), the City will also 6e providing 9 assistance to various minority and special need households. l; I, i A-70 i DRAFT ':gional Fusing Needs Assessment FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Sf:ate Law ,requires the Southern California Association. of Governments to complet.: a; detailed housing needs assessment which is used to assign responsibilities to jurisdictions to help meet the percentage of the regions low income housing needs-for a five year period. The most recent Aegional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) update was completed in December of 1988. I The Regional Housing Needs Assessment identified both existing housing needs for a jurisdiction as well as its projected five year housing need" 6-1sting need is defined by SCAG as, "the number of lower incomie households paying more than 30 percent of their income for 6using." Whereas, futurf" need is defined as, "the number of units that would have to be added in each,jurisdiction to >, accommodate the forecasted gv.^wth 'in the number of households by July 1, 1994, t as well as the number of units that Would have to be added to compensate for t anticipated demo€itions and changes to achieve an "idea;','vacancy rate." The future need is then further broken down into four income categories,as defined by State Law. The four categories are very low (less than 50 percent of the Adft median), low (50 to 80 Percent of .the mediae), middle 180 to 120 percent of the median) and upper (more than 120 percent of the median)., The Regioral Housing Needs Assessment estimated that Rancho Cucamonga currently has 3,069 existing vary low ;and low income householdr, currently in need of assistance. 0f those, 1,723 are owner households and !,346 are rental households, as shown in Table A-19. The 'suture housing need identified by SCAG indicates that an additional 9v»46 9,568 households will be needed in the City by 1994. 0f this total number of households, 2;946 2,375 are estimated to be very ':iw and low "income and IrM 1,729 are estimated to be moderate income. Due to the high cost of housing in the City, it is assumed that all future very low and--:low income households gill be in need of assistance. Therefore, the total number of lor%er income households overpaying, for shelter as of 1994 including existing (3,069) and future need 42;349} (2,375) is estimated to be, 6;414 5,444. A-71 DRAFT TABLE A-19 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSl ,S ONLY CURRENT AND FUTURE HOUSEHOLDS NEEDING ASSISTANCE PART I-19118 EXISTING NEED* 1988 Housing Units 31,665 988 Households 29,844 1988 Unoccupied units %821 y Law Income Burdened Vory Low Income Low Income Haucaholds LIH s/1 fir Burdened HHs 5,8e.7 3,069/52.2 1380 1,689 r 1723 urder!ed� � VU Owners 736 LI Owners 986 Burdened Renters 1,346 VU Renters 643 LI Renters 703 PART If-FUTURE NEED THROUGH 1994 V__EY Low Income LewLjaga= Moderate Income HiUh Income 1,117 1,258 11729 5,463 PART III-EXISTING AND Ft T'URE NEED 'Very Low Incoma, Low Income I rdengd 1 eaa S$8 1,360 1 v�.,. 3,069 1994.. 1.197 1MA 2.975 2,497 2,947 5,444 • Soures: The Revised Regional Housing n0 Needs Assessment at December 1988 -Assumption that all now Very tow and Lower Income households will be burdened R-72 'q DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Table A-20 illustrates, using tke median inco,ne of $32,200 for the Riverside- Aft . .. San Bernardino MSA as of April, 1989, what the various income ranges would be for the region. This is compared to the income ranges for Rancho Cucamonga, ' which are based on an estimated median in'�-ne of $44,726. TABLE A-20 INCOME RANGES FOR RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDIh O MSA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3 Very Lour Low ModsrrAe Upper 0-50% 50.80% 80-100% Over 12D% Of NwInn 21.14201W Of lsa% Of Medlin Riv.-San Bern MSA' 0-16,100 16,100-26,760 25,76D-38,640 38,640+ Rancho Cucn=ngW* 0-22,363 22,363-35.781 35,781-53,671 63,671+ 1, ARL • Based on the O.S.Dept,X HWIng and Dweloprnonf median kewne Iirgure of 337,2W for a famly of tour in fire Riverside-San Bernardino MSA as of April 1989. Based on an estimated 1989 median income of$44.726;caWated by Wiftnts•Kust?s beck&Associates.In,.9r the Draft Affordable Housing Strategy A-73 . DRAFT ' FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY it is the overall identified need, of low and very low income households that. the majority of the Housing Element programs are targeted for in the provision of direct monetary assistance, rehabilitation programs, or the encouragement of affordable priced housing. During the period of 1980 to the present, the,aCity has made a good fai-6 effort to meet the current and future needs of low and moderate income households. In 1983 alone, two multiple family developments were cosripleted which utilized HUD Section 8 rental subsidization. These two developments contain a total of 317 units out of which 157 have been made available under the Section & program. The approval and development of these two projects were directly related to�the housing programs prepared in 1980. Since 1984, three.,senior;housing apartment_projects have been approved of which two have been constructed. In the first project a total of'232 units, of which 70 percent, or 163 units, are reserved for senior citizens earning less than 80 percent of the San Bernardino median 1pcome. The second project was developed with a total of 168 units, of which AO percent are to be available to senior citizens earning less than`80 percent of the County cif San Bernardino median , income. A third project of 170 units, which has been'a}proved but not as yet constructed, was originally required to have 50 percent or ;85 units:available to low and moderate income, households. however, in July 1990, the property was acquired by the Redevelopment Agency with their 20 percent set aside funds and'as a result, up to 100 percent of the units could be made available to lower income households. There have been additional projects which have been assisted through various means. and are further 0dressed in the Sections below. I f _ A-74 Housing Assistance Plan DRAFT ARL FOR DISCUSSIC-N PUr PC?SES ONLY 1p The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared as part of its Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Housing Assistance Plan ;HAP). The HAP identifies the housing needs of various special groups (elderly, small family, and large family), minority groups;•,,and also identifies the breakdowns between owner/renter households and lower ;income households versus all households needing assistance. In addition, the HAP shows the goals tlthich the City is to undertake in the CDBG program in areas such as rehabA itation of substandard units, new construction of affordable rental uni,ts,;and rental subsidies for the various special needs groups. The HAP, as of April, 1989, identifies a total of 1,946 Lower income households needing rental subsidy assistance. This can be broken down by identifying 174 elderly lower income households (8.9 percent), 1,419 - small family lower income households (72.9 percent), and 353 large family lower income households (18.1 percent) needing rental subsidies. Clearly, rental assistance is a major area of focus which the City needs to, pursue. The HAP is divided into three year and'one year goals which identify numerical Lti actions to helpreduce these special p groups needing assistance. By September, 1991, it is the City's goal to. have facilitated rental assistance to 20 elderly households, 130 small families and 25 large families. In terms of the number of rental units to be assisted, it is the City's goal to have provided funding for the rehabilitation of five units with the hop!�'that the new r,Fin.,A rehabilitation program oper'lted by the County of Safi)Bernardino wi?�i1 be utilized. It is a goal that 200 new units will be assisted through use,i)f the existing Mortgage Revenue Bond Program of which 20 percent will serve low or moderate income households. Prorframs to addressv"ihe needs of loaner and moderate income households have been included Oder ObJective Statement S. contained in. Chapter 2 of the element. , A-75 DRAFT 1 FOR DISCUSSION URFL2SE5 ONLY Other factors-Vhich this 4PA identifies are the efforts in providing_ownershi p, assistance for acquisition and`general home improvements. Through 1991 it is the 'City's intent, through Mortgage Revenue'Bond Program, to provide low inzerest mortgage loans for first time home buyers= for _approK~tmately 200 households. It is also-the City's intent to assist 18 lower 'income F ausehoids w-;-th home improvement assistance and '75 senior households; and disabled or handicapped with emergency repair grants. By meeting these above noted goals, the City will be assisting the various special and minority household groups in the City. Further discussion on � these needs is provided in a later portion of this section. The total n-ber of households _in the KA showing a current need for rental subsidy assistance (1,946) doev not differ grtAtly from the numbeio. idertified by SCAG (1,346 households). The-600 household difference might be attrib; ted to the difference in dates when the two studies were ccnducted4if In formulating the housing pr-ngrams, the City will be exaGining both the Hkp and the SCAG-RHNA forecasts. $R this ways the proyPams, eaR be devel-eped sueh that the melt Reeded greups eaff be assisted pwepewlyr As a result, a number of Ask programs have been added,to assist those in need of rental assistance. These programs are contained in Chapter 2, 0biective S. Policy A. and include such items as continuation of the Multi-faamily Mortgage P.everuse Bond Program, providing information "and., encouraging the use of Se:ti.on 8 program's, continuing the use of the Mobile Have Park Accord, as well as the C2velopment j Of new housing opportunities through the use of the Redevelopment Agency's 20 percent set aside fund. Comunity Development Block Grant Pmaram I The vast majority of the City's housing-,stock is sound; however, there are deteriorated units in older parts of kancho Cucamonga which require immediate attention. With some improvement efforts these units can. continue to serve the housing needs rf the City, A-76 ;;, is DRAFT Foy DISCUSSiqN PURPOSES ONLY The Community Development Block Grant program developed by the City is designed to: (a) f( �'-s efforts within the desi.gnated target areas;_ (b) upgrade the existing housing stock; and (c) improve inadequate and substandar'� public improvements. The intent of this approach is to eliminate the causes and prevent the -spread of bl.fght ,and deterioration, apd, to support the investment of public and private funds and rehabilitation. The specific program objectives developed for the 1988-89 year have been designed to meet the community needs and achieve i:,he following: (a) upgrade and maintenance;,of the existing housing stock; (b) preservation of the City-'s historic resources (c) elimination of discrimination. in the sale and rental of housing; (d) provision of counseling and referral services to senior citizens; (e) improvement of inadequate and,substandard public facilities; and (f) the provision of recreational 'facilities that are accessible to low and moderate income persons. Currently, there are' 'five targeted areas is the City for the home ..Aprovement program as shown on Ma � A-4. The Housing Improvement Program is Citywide and is based on individual income levels. Below market rate interest leans are available for major repa"irs and emergency .repair grants are available to Senior Citizens and handicapped or disabled home owners. In addition, in order to ensure fair housing practices, the City contracts with Inland Mediation to provide counseling and to assiTt in finding- senior roommate matches. The City also will continue to fund the construction of public improvements -in the Southwest Cucamonga Target area_- Finally, a new program objecti+?e will involve the development of a loan and/or grant program to assist owners of historic properties to undertake maintenance and restoration. A47 W zcc pg co a �, m o fi)� c m � co E U' ar Wti Q � mul0i c oU N v �� wci0 o mo IL __ ,\ ~ _: LU i .r 5 a o , L:M4-1c LU Z Z co o LL o� m li �cc�a NMvLo o � o p fi pea N j r pusmog aea ,�61� lea 'II }-, •,teaaa,� 1 S&I Jams ,eyetyeoa �� enema _ Us�JMUM PAIL WUJA i N �� eseuuay .. ....... .. � Ple&4u+Y r . ; e E;owep CM f C j ACID A-78 -� "/5- 4 DRAF'!' -- ial Needs Populations —� FOR DISCUSSION FcJRPi;�SES ONLY By meeting the goals of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) and the HAP the City will also be providing assistance to the var 41is minority and special needs household `' the following is .a discussion of the various special populations in the-City in need of assistance: A. Minority Households ''Estimates of the tota'1 number of lower income minority,households (earning less than 80 percent of the County median income)' are proyideJ in Tables A-Z and A-22. This information provided b he 1989 HAP, estimates`' ��at P y'w 1 ih%\rr are approximately 119 lower income minority hoc holds living in sub,,a,z;ard ;housing in Rancho Cucamonga, and that theca are 358 lower income minority households in need of rental assistance. In many case ,,discriminatory practices based on race, religion, color, or �2x,oresents barriers,;to equal housing, opportunities for minorities. As a Mink resu}` it is i,mrortant for the City to encourage fair housing practices through support of Inland Mediation. r A-79 DRA T t; TABLE A-21 FOR DiscussiON PURPOSES ONLY MINORITY LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN SUBSYANDARD 'HOUSING Ethniclh, Srwner VAnter Black - 12 2 1 fSpanish Origin 74 14 dative American 4 1 Asian or Pacific Islander 10 2 I II Total % 100 19 I Source: April 1989 Final Swement of Community 0biecu"s forths 1989-90 Cemtnmity Development Block Grant pnszram.. i TAME A-22 MINORITY LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS REQUIRING RENTAL ASSISTANCE EthnIcRy EIdqI1X ftail Family, Flnft 1 Black 2 -I 6 4 Spanis»:.Origin 21 221 55 Native American 1' 15 4 Asian or Pacific Islander 1 14 4 ;1 Total 25 266 67 Sot, -AprR 19V Final Statement of Community Objectives for the 1989.90 Community Development BbCr "t pwram, A-80 i. I 41. The Di tabled DIRAFT :; FOR DiscuSstON AURpOSES ONLY From a housing perspective,)' 1 ,here are three different types of disabled persons, with vat';ding \hous'v�g needs; the developmentally disabled; the physically disabled; and the mentally disabled. Table A-23 provides a tabulation of the number of physically and developmentally disabled. persons in the City which is further summarized be;nw. Available data from the HAP estimated approx 2,656 disabled household as of 1988. The State Department of Development Services indicate that :there are approximately 21.0 developmentally disabled persons in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Approximately one-half of these individuals are adults (104, 35 percent are children aged 4 to 18 (75), with the remaining'15 percent under 3 years of age. Based on information from the 'focal Social Security office, there ar,', approximately 900 physically dis I ed,adults in Rancho Cucamonga. ',I' addition, the local school districts 'tdicate that there are approximately 426 children, aged 6 to 18, with disabilities. A majority of these children (404) have speech impairments. There are no numbers avai'able to determine the number of mentally disabled living in the City. ' Typically, it is architect ural barriers in housing which pose a canasion pi bblem to disabled people. 0ther housing needs of these persons may involve institutional care facilities, transitional living facilities as well as low cost housing. Low cost housing may become particularly important when an individual no longer requires institutional or group support, or is subsisting only on social security income. „s A-81 GRAFT TABLE -23 FoR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY DISTRIBUTION OF D,SABLED POPULATION DEOEMBER,1989 DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED' Numbers of @N,Gr= Persons 0 to 3 31 4 to 12 68 I 13to 18 17 19 to Over 104", Total 210 PHYShALLY DISA13LED plumberrs of Aga GrouWDl�lij� Pern4o I 6to8" Speech Impaired 404 Hard of Hearing 3 Visually suali Impaired 2 i Orthopedic 3 Other 14 Total,Ages 6 to 18 426 IL`&Over"' 900 Total 1,326 From Stata Department of Developmental Services From West End SpecW12--ducation Loral Plan Area Approximate number of adults receW ig social securty bcne►ds for physical dfsWilty Source: Drat,Affordable Housing Strategy,Williams-Kuetcabeck&Associates AftL A-822 DRAFT C. Senior Citizens: FOR DISCUSSJVi,N PURPOSES ONLY , ' , Nationally, the heHcan population is growing ,older. In the Clty;`it is estimated that there are 2,297 elderly-headed households, a-ssumin�9' the same prcportign of the population as in 1980. 'Cowever, the ,?roportion of Rancho Cucamonga's population which is 65 years or older..is expected to have increased above the 7.7 percent cited in the 7980 census. Living on fixed incomes and the ever increa log cost of living will pose a serious problem to many of these seniors,. Not only will,.--the provision of affordable housing be a problem;,. but even yhose who own their own homes' may find living costs so high that home maintenance needs are neglected. Assistance to these seniors to 'help find;alternati v financing means, low interest loans for grants or shared situations simuld be continued through Inland Mediation:-The Sen or,5hare Prog=&m. D. Large Families: Large familiex are comprised of families of .or mora persons. Tiiese families rep►,esent a housing concern due to both the difficulty of finding &jUate sized housing 'units and the resulting high costs associated with these larger units. Thus large families stiffer disnroportiouately from over-crowding and inability to pay I In 1980 there were approximately 2,723 large families representing 16 percent of the City's households. 0f these, 84 were renter occupied units. The small !number cf rental units is likely due to the lack of availability of appropriate sued units. j i In developing an estimate for 1989, the number of large families in the population is assumed to be in the same proportion 1980. As a = result, it is estimated that there are approximately 4.,709 large famili,Qs. A-83 x� DRAB E. Single Heads of Households. FOR,.r3ISCU-F�SION :=,., g.°CSES ONLY According to the 1980 census,_ there were a total of 3,711 single_heads of households in Rancho Cucamonga, oi'.which 2,233, or 60 percent, were,female headed .ard represented 13.2 p F'�rcent of all households in one; City. As r shown in T ble A-M, the total' ;yumber of female headed households 'in need of assistance (paying more than 30 percent of their gross monthly income for houa`ng) totaled 997 (or 44.6 percent of all female householders), of which 576 (57.7 percent) were rn,tirtgage holders and 421 (42.3 percent) were renters. q "csti*-,figs front tiie 1980 census inaicate that., there were 1,055 single parent households of which 823, or 78 percent, were female headed. Of _these, 280 ware lower :income households (earning less than 80 percent of the area median intdme) and 101 were in need of rer;tal �5sistance. The Siiy's HAP estimates that as ofi 1988_ there were'627 iower income single parent ;househol;3s of -which 538, or 85.8 percent, were female headed. If these, it is estimated thaw i.rie"ra were 243 single parent'. households in need of rental assistance of<vdhich 195 were female headed. This data indicates that a dispreporiionaie number of tole households in the City are headed by singlo wz-.0n_living below the poverty level and who are paying more than 30 percent of their monthly income for housing. Additionally, the wajority �of the single.'Went households in., the Nty in 1980 were altofemale headed (78 percent) �.,Y• t:+i3 propnrt ur. has probably time. p y ; �ain'.; 'the same or inc'rease� sfince'that time. As a result, a large proportion of single heads,, of households, particularly thc-, ' ho are single p&*.;.nts..wilth dependent children need housing which is affordable and 'ncated cls a to servi es such as day , care, parks, schools,, and recrea- ,Jn facileties. A-84 GR.��FT TABLE A-24 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSEc SiNULE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD BY AGE AND ISEX PAYM16RE THAN! 30% U F GROSS INCOME ON HOUSING 1980. FEMALE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD `.G'1FItOf, at 30-34ei;, 0 36 17 20 0 35%+ 0 '17`l 154 R4 88 Total 0 213 171 104 d8 7. 21 6 30>34% 22 3:.' I .. 35-49% 32 40 11 7 18 50+ 70 87 2.,-: 11 27 Total 124 162 46 39 51Afti MALE HEAD OF HOUSE'.¢OL® Owner 30-34% 7 44 20 7 6 35%+ 34 61` ,Q 14 1`1 Total 41 zll79 21 ' 17 f Rentea ' i 30-34%° 22 12 14 ;g_ 0 i 35-49%° 26 14 6, 14 0- 50%+ 42 7 2ir 10 0 Taal JO `33 46 31 0 Source: 1980 Federal Census A-85 DRAFT F. H less: r'OR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Based on a survey of local law and code enforcenent agencies_ social ' �1r servia:e offices as we11''as local churches and informed citizenry conducted ;n January, 1990, the Planning Division has determined that there are approximately 25 persons or less on an average daily basis in .need of.- snelter. The majority of th.ae person_: are men between the ages of 18,,and 6'3 and are primarily illegal aliens and/or substan:e abusers. The second identifiable group of persons in need of,,shelter is comprised of women with young children. This group accounts for less than 5.percent of the c+arall total. The only form of shelter assistance for the homeless in -`he City currently available is provided by.',ocal churches or charitable organizations in tnez,.`form' of motel vouchers,or by paris'4ioners who take these people into their homes. There are currently two motels in the City which have- been used far emergency housing, the'New Kansan and Notel 66. It is also possible that motel facilities in nearby communities are utilized as well. »: The C.'rty's Development Code currently does not include designations which specifically`'allow the develop,'nent of sheltE= facilities, although it is possible that eY`F Ling definitions in the G.O for Group Care Facilities and Residintia!"Care Facilities may be inte',preted for this use. As a result, the City should evaluate ex stlnq, Code definitions and requirements to determine those conditi;,ons and standards where types of shelter facilities` can be located, JnO ud;nc'l rebiew ar-1 evaluation of <' industrial districts, Housing Element fi ction 65583(a.)(6)) requires the analysis of the special housing needs of persons and families in need of �,mergency shelter and the identification of adequate sites to facilitate the development of; emergency shelters and +rensitional housing. To this end, the 'City may follow one or more courses of action discussed below: Y• � A-8� DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 1. As the majority of the assistance of homeless in the City is. currently provided by 1!'.,Jcal churches and/or organizations in the form of motel voucherr., the City should continue to monitor the number of homeless and provide assistance to these groups if requested. Vouchers would be used in any local motel sites in the City or in adjacent communities; and 2. The City c wld use either CDBG or Redevelopment Agency 20 kpercent set-aside funds, or a combination of the two, to de�'elop a transitional housing program. At a minimum, this program+ilshould involve direct subsidies in the form of grants and/or loans,,4to be used +nward housing entry costs, i.e., first and l!sst months rent and. security deposit. An expanded program could be explored which would involve the provision of longer term shelter in combination with ,job training and money management; and 3. She 'ity should evaluate existing code requirements to determine those conditions and standards where various types of shelter_ facilities can be located, including review and evaluation of industrial districts. 4. Finally, the City should offer to participate with adjacent communities toward the provision of a subregional shelter service. This is part?cularly-important as the homeless problem does not lust follow jurisdictional boundaries, but rather, is a larger regional prob'iem. Therefore, in order to address the prohlem in a comprehensive_manner, the City should encourage tha development of a more subregional approach. E G. Farmworkers. The special needs of mapy farmorkers stem from their lox wages and insecure nature of their emp'ioymes-it. En 198Q, the Census identified 138 persons in the farsming forestry, and fishing cccupations which represented .25 percent of the City's population. A-87 DRAB FOR DISCUSS1014 PURPOSES C31�1LY Wan attempt to estimate the current far corker populatiain at the CSty,' staff has contaete&,several State, County, and local a9eft=A3 and sauna ,?that this ape of specific i+nforuation is generally ur.lgailable." However,, the i ocal State 1opl,oyment Bevel opMent Department indicated ghat the need for farnworkers in the City Of Rancho Ctecmonga has drgpped drastically in recent years. Evidence for this stateamt can be clearly shown as the major?ty of land 4n the City origirplly devote&to citrus and vineyard production has given may-to nor development in the ast ten years. As a, esult, housing opportunities' for those;fiilho continue to be lnvalied in this type of work can be enhanced by' expanding the City's affordable housing stock through the programs ULKitified fln Chapter 2 of the housing Ii Element:: I ,.. H .,gipp.-88 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Hg. Existing Affordable Projects with the ibtential to Convert to 14arket Rate Rents: As the result of recent legisle:tion (Sg 1282) cities are required to provide an inventory and analysis of existing assissted housing developments that are eligible to change to ncn-lok' income housing uses during the next 10 years, which is to be included in the City's Housing ElemeO by January i, 1992. The term "assisted housing developments" includes all mul-ti-family rental housing that receives assistance from a broad range of programs including federal programs, state anii local multi- far,,,1y revenue bond programs, or local in-lieu fees. The bill also requires the 'above referenced analysis and inventory to irclude a cost estimate for producing nor ''repiacenent housing,' an identification of groups that could `possi6ly acquirz and manage the,'jniits as we'll as an assessment of possible State and Federal funds t5at co:ild be used to preserve the assistedhousing development:,. As a result of the req.irk�ments outiine,d above, the City shall provide an additional update to the Housino 'clement before .January 1, 1992. Table A ' 25 is a list of those projects which have received.-multi-family mortgage revenue bond financing. In addition, projects which have received other forms of ?ocal assistance are also shown, with the type or financing a term of affordability identified. In addition, Table A-26 provides a summary analysis of the City's identified housing need, including special heads populations. , f A_frg 1 DRAFT ASSISTED MULTI-FAMIL 4E aL YPO%?[Au YU&IES ONLY MULTI-FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND PROJECTS Approval Date/ Units Term Income Project I<ocation Oeiiryed Rosented E93Pa c P 4/12183 Parkview Place,opts 10935 Terra Vista,Pkwy. _30 of 152 10'iears 80%of Median 4/12/83 Lt..View Apts:' 10935 Terra Vista Pkwy. 54 of 270 10 Years 80%of Median 3/13/84 Pepperwood Apts. 90155 Foothill Blvd. 46 of 230 10 Years 80%of Median 11A N84 Han►',age Park Senior Apts 9601 Lomita Ct., 45 of 233 10 years 80%of Median 9/27/85 Alta Park Apts. 10400 Arrow Rt. 75 of 396 10 Years 80%of Median 8/28/85 Sycamore Te race 10935 Terra Vista Pkwy. 26 of 128 10 Years 80°/a of Median 8/28/85 Evergreen Apts. 1073t"G1111,ech 79 of 393 1.0 Years 80%of Mee'ian SECTION 8,NEW CONSTRUCTION 4/82 Woodhaven Manor I 62W Haven Ave. 117 of 117 40 Years Section 8(CHFA) 12/82 [Dan Miguel 4 pt s 9050 19th St 40 of 200 20 Years Section 8 SENIOR HOUSING 2/15/84 Heritage Park Senior Apts. 960'! Lomita Ct. 163'of 233 20 Years 80%of Median 4/17/85 Rudolph Hendrickson 6628 Amethyst ib8 of 168 15 Years 80%of Median Total 798 of 2287 !nciudes the 45 units of Mu!ti-Fpry,4,Mortgage Rovonue Bond Financlrrg A-90 bFT TABLE A-26 FOR. Y)ISC;USSI0"\f PURPOSES �Le►i,:rj� NEED FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTIM-4-AN® SPEC►AF, NEEOS .PG' ilLATIONS AS OF DECEMBER 1.9»ls tdentliled Housing Heads \1 1. 1986 Existing Dwelling Units 31,665 2. 1 g88 Existing Households 29,844 S. Lower income Households Overpaying for Housing 3,069 a. Total Very Low Income 1,380 ` b. Total Low Income 1,689 c. Renters 1,.346 Very Lave Income 643 1,ow Income 703 f , d,Owners 1,723 Very Low Income 736 Law Income 98E 4. Special Needs Households 13,299 a. Handicapper! 2,656(1) i b. Elderly-ltea+ed 2,297(2) c. Larga Fafoilie5 4,70,9(3) I d. Single Parent ,029(4) Female Single Parent 1,563 e. Homeless 25 I 5. Overcrowded Households 1,349(5) � S. Substandard Units 64<116) a. NeedingRehabilitation' 5 ..38 b. Needing Replacenjent 108 I continued... A-91 DRAFT TABLE A-26 CONTINUE® FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Identified Housing Needs; 7. Five Year Now. Constructie i Needs 9;568(7) Low(0-00%of median) 1,117 % b. Qther Low(50-80!/01- 1 258 +;. Moderate(80-120%) o 1,729 a: Above Moderate(120°) « 5,463 8. Total New Construction Needs 1 (line 6b f Line 7) 9,676 ,:1 9. Needed Average Annual Housing Productions to Achieve Five Year Goa! 1,935(8), 'W, New units Provided From 7/1/89;o Vi/90 1,890(9) i (1) Estimate from the CWS 1986 Housing Asslstance Plan. (2) Estimated as 7.7 percent of all occupied households,consistent with the 1980 popr�lati m (3) Estimate from tho Draft Affordable Housing strategy,Table 11-19. (4) Estimate from the'City's 198(i Housing Assistance Plan. (5), Estimate from the Draft Affordable Housing Strategy,Table 11-23. (6) From the 1988 Housing Assistance Man(HAP). (7) includes replacement of demoliVons per RHNA (8) includes all replacemant housing,total averaged over a five year period, (9) Based on Department of finance Estimates for 1989. A-92 DRAB C)R L71SCUSgION PURP01EE ONL V, YIh1. ENERGY Ca1S VATION QPFATUNITIES i Energy conservation in the home has changed dramaticaily,an the past few years with the adoption of Title 24 of the Calif^rnia AdmirAstratt,ve� Code. This sectim describes the opportunities associated wfth'Stat'le legislation, as well , as opportunities which<jthe City is enceuraging as part of its Development i Code. The highlights of this section are provided in the list Selaw: * Optional -development standards require- energy,conservation appliances j and features and an alternative solar energy system in appropriate situations. * Solar access and rights ,are enccuraggd as part of the 1984 Development ,- Code. ,\ Enforcement of`State energy re�uiiremei,rs (Title-\24) is a part,;of the bu`r`lding plan check process. A-93 DRAFT TWe 24 FOR DISCUSSION PURPGSES ONLY Under Section 65583(a)7 of the Californir. Government Code, a' City's 1lous ng Element m'w�t contain an "analysis of=opportunities for energy, conservation wit'?, respect to residential development." Since the adoption of the Housing Element statutes, the California Energy Commission has established and adopted energy �vmprovement specifications for both single family and multiple. 'family structures under four stories: These energy specifications require both; active anO passive energy features for all residential developments. The Cii� `1 of Rancho Cucamonga enforces these State Energy requirements for tone 97 for ft both single family-and ,multiple family unit types. Development Code t In addition to the State requirements, the City has alsj incorporated a7' part of the adopted Development Code passive and active solar 'energy requirements. By using established 'optional development standards higher densities are allowed than with the conventional development standards. In view of this added dwelling density,, it is required that energy conserving appliances and features (i.e. reduced water consumption shower heads, water conserving toilets,' etc.) aid an alternative solar energy system to provide domestic 1,10t wafer far, all, dwelling units and fur heating a swimming,pool or spa be provided. A specific section on solar access is also included in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. This provides suggestions and opportunities to developers in the preliminary site plannirtg and site designing of a residential development. In the solar access section it is encouraged that consideration be given to the folrowing areas: 7 Rancho Cucamonga falls into Climate Zone 9 as established by the =� California Energy Commission. A-94 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 1. That new residential developments provide for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. This can be approached through such listed examples of lot size and configuration permitti,r,q orientation of a structure in an east-west alignment for a_ southern exposure, or by establishing lot sizes and configurations which permit orientation or a residential structure such that it call take advantage of shade ;jr prevailing breezes. 2. Consideration to local climate, to topography and land contour, to lot configuration and to ether design and impro::,_n-nt requirements a►t);encouraged. 3. Consideration to the long axis so the majority of individ!Aal ,Its are within 22.5 degrees east or west of true south for adoquate exposure for present or future solar energy systems is another energy conservation opportunity. 4. Landscape specifications such that no tree or shrub, can he placed or grown in such a manner as to in "arfere with ar.,y existing solar collector. 5. Residential planning should consider the ability to provide all nee c.nits with receiving sialight across adjacent lots or buildings should a solar collector be desired and insta7leu in 'Ier years. Thin would includ!z the establishment of solar easements in the dr.claration e,` restrictions. for the development. Th1 easements in essepre would 'preclude the casting of shadows b;1 vegetation, structures, fixture;,, or any other object. The City feels that these special +lar conservation, cr,;teria of the `hvelopment Code in conjunction with Title 24 energy t")quiremants of the State provide maximum opportunities to dievelopers of all`-xesiden`ill unit types. The programs established by the Housing Element merely reitet to the State and present City opportun;ti�s, it is fell: that in this way energy conservation is achieved while still 'pru,;: ing flexibilit,, and creativity in residential building design. A-95 -_ DRAFT FOR C3TSG(1SSj014 PURPOSES ONLY IX. EXISTING HOUSING CMDITIMS Thi "=Section provides information on the cordF*ioa of housin4 units anal-the extent of overcrowding in Rancho Cucamonga. The follbuinn are the highlights: . * Overall, the housl;ng stock is in good condition; .howevar, :here are pockets of older areas with concentrations of units in need of repair, Er,phasis must be placed on rehabilitati�Sn programs to maintain the sound condition of the housing stock. * Approximately 7 percent .of the City's popula'tton live in overcrowded dwellings, as defined by the 1980 U.S. Census. f _ I _ � A-96 DRAFT i Housing Conditions FOR DISCUSSION PUFZl"dSES ONLY Recent estimates by the State Department of Finance indicate that there are-. 34,449 dwelling units in Rancho Cucamonga"as of January 1, i989. Eighty-five percent of the City's housing stock, or 29,254 units have been constructed since 1970. Since 1960, 93 percen'r of the total, or all but 2,260 dwelling units in the City have been constructed. i As a result, the`general condition of the City`s housing stock is very good. Map A-5 shows the median age of the housing 'stock by year built. There are four specific areas where older units in need of rehabilitation are most likely to occur. This information can be used to target areas for the City's j rehabilitation programs. Through reW ili,'ation and maintenance programs for low and moderate income 'households, the City can help to maintain the curreptly sound condition of the vast --_rarity of the housing stock. The survey focused on older areas where poorer housio,,! conditions were likely to be found. A housing condition windshield survey was conducted by the Planning Division staff in December, 1979. The su;,wey fo,vsed on older areas where poorer housing conditions were likely to be found. Approximately 83 percent of the units si!rveyed were Judged to be in -4,und condition, 12 percent were deteriorated (units exhibiting serious defects, but can be reasonably rehabilitated),,• and 4;_percent were dilapidated (units which are so far deteriorated that _rehabilitation efforts would probably be precluded by cost). The City's HAP prepared in April, 19R9, estimated that there`.-ire 646 substandard housing units, of which 538 were suitable for rehabi,",Atation. A-97 r� 17� Z �J mm co AdIlL d T �WLU CD M.m® s ®o O>T w `oIIgZ9 c) ID� 00 Q�•O � CIScovinconn o 9 m rn rn cy)CD _ Co _ ,\ s0 T T T T T Te: �a L 0 cc i o fi3 ' •° li ��cna cam �1 (wt U) .O IL z ., II� -4ea,a Raa ® ti t i s i s Uapaa i Ali M i• r }p� R/OW,aH •� I . 5 t �• •_ .f p1�9e4��tl umull iaH I $ p1WItaUTA uailou,e ttt���A ° III j®fag `ctc` .e e 1 � � 9 • A-98 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ON y In addition, ill14ay of 1989, the Planning Division conducted a survey of the, physical condition of both the Southwest Cucamonga and the 0ld Alta Loma areas. A� part of the assessment, the condition of the structures, yards, iandscap ng, fences, and walls were evaluated. In addition, the ;,number of garage conversions, wrecked, inoperable vehicles, appliances stored in open view and the condition of public improvements were noted. Structures built in the Southwest Cucamonga area are,primarily single-family units_built from the 1940s to the 1960s. Based on the exterior condition of the units in the area, it was found that few structures needed major repairs (15 percent; such as new paint, doors, roofs, or windows. Yard maintenance appeared to be more of a problem than structural, deterioration, with approximately 36 percent of the units requiring maintenance of landscaping fences and yards. As in Southwest Cucamonga, the Old Alta Lz;q, `area is also primarily developed with single family units (79 percent), bl, i from the 1940s to the present, although there are a number of 2 and 4 unit 'structures (19 percent). A larger proportion of the units An this area require major repairs '(18 percent) involving more than half the structure with minor repairs necessary an an additional 31 percent of the units. -Only an estimated 12 percent of the units � required yard maintenance in this area. Other information from the 1980 census indicated that 104 persons resided in 43 dwellings with no plumbing, and 100-units had either no bathrooms or only a `i half-bath without a tub or shower. The vast majority of dwelling units had central heating (85 percent), and use utility gas for heating (87 percent), cooking fuel (76 percent), and water heating (92 percent). Forty-nine units had ,no heating equipment and 107 dwellings had no kitchen facilities. In terms of the total number of housing units in the City, the dwellings without heating or plumbing represented only one percent. A-9g r -�17 DRAFT FOR DiSCUSSION PUR'P®SE:S ONLY Fiegardiny the number of bedrooms, the 1980 census indicated that the majority' of units the City (17f 500 - ;76 percent) had either three or four bedrooms. Fifteen percent 'f the units had 2-bedrooms, while 6 percent Y".d 1 bedroom Based upon Fedora] Census, overcrowding is defined as occupancy;in excess of 1.01 persons per room. Overcrowding is a housing problem primarily restricted to older section of parcho Cucamonga. According to the i980 ce,sus, 591 units were overcrowded, 396 r*ner occupied and 195 rentp,r occupied. The numS'e— f persons per room was bf.•�ween 1.01-1,50 for '116 units, while 175 units were more seriously overcrowded with 1.51 or more'persons per room. According to the 1980 census 3,628 persons, or 7 percent, of Rancho Cucamonga's population lived-in ,overcrowded units. Housing ode Enfomit:a nt The rode Enforcement M17,ion in Rancho Cucamonga `,�currently operates on a complaint responsc !?I,-is. Once a violation is reportied, an officer will make personal contact, in adzition to providing a w itten notice requesting AM correctior. of the violation. If progress toward compliance is not observed within 2 weeks, a multi-s*,ep< process begins, which involves additional noticing and in some cases can lead to the issuance of k Court Appearance Citation. The overall emphasis of the Code. Enforcement. program_is :,o ensure that progress toward correction of violations is achieved on a voluntary basis. In order to achieve this end, one focus of the Code Enforcement program has been toward ordinance improvement, -to provide the City with the ability to remedy specific problems. Two recently approved ordinances set specific criteria for S public nuisance and vehicle abatement. Additional areas of operation include property maintenance t5; aesthetics, land use and zoning, parking control, animal regulation, permits and development weed abatement, vector control, as well as community awareness. A-100 r DRAFT FOR DISCIUSSiON PURPOSES ONLY The eventual goal of the Code Enforcement Division is to shift the emphasis of- Aft the program from one that is 'complaint oriented to one that is more proactive. This type of ;program would then be able to focus on specific neighborhoods, particularly those which are basically sound but just beginning to show signs of deterioration, or it could focus on specific issues such as vehicle abatement or yard maintenance. It is Likely that •phis type of program will evolve as the City's housing stock increases and the pace of growth slows and as increased expenditures become available to hire additional personnel. AML le A--1101 i i DRAFT DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AOL X. WiSTRAINTS TO 7HE DEVELOPMENT OF HWSIits - _Jl This section discusses the potential ,governmental and market constraints upon: the, maintenance, `improvement, c�4= development of housing, for all income levels. The con::traints include areas such as public services and development fees, school overcrowding,% timing and.financing of infrastructure, housing prices, and the effect of interest rates on home buyers. The following are t{ the highlights: * Although development fees add 7-8 percent to the cost of new"housing they are necessary to assure'�that new development will have adequate j public services and improvements. I * Timing and financing of school construction, and sewer and water facilities must,;'oe coordinated with residential growth ,to provide adequate servfzes. R \11 * Major storm d,ain and channel projects require long-term financing techniques in order to gjNminate development constraints. * lower interest financing rates are critical to providing affordable housing. Agh A-lq2 Governmental Constraints DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY A. LanS Use and Zoning: The City's General Plan establishes six residential density categories "for purposes of providing the City Faith a range of building intensities that allow r_-flexibility to deal with various site constraints and opportunities.", , The density ranges of these residential categories are as follows Density Range Category Minimum Maximum Very Low (VL) 0.1 2 Loa (L) 2 4 Lour Medium (LH) 4 8 P-dium (M) 8 14 Medium High (MH) 14 24 High (H) 24 30 In addition to these residential categories, the General Pian provides for three open space categories, two of which may allow saw residential developmeT' based ups results of environmental studies. the Hillside Residential designation permits limited development up to 2 dKelling units to the acre. The Open Space designation identifies areas where land is to remain essentially open, but residential development may be permitted at a density not to exceed 1 dwelling unit per 10 acres. The remaining Opel Space category is designated as Flood Control/utility corridor, and no residential development is permitted in this area. Rancho C,ucamonga's residential development requirements contained in the City's development Code and the four community development plans, which are identified on Map A-2, (Etivanda Specific Plan, Victoria Community Plan, Terra Vista Community Plan, and the Caryn Comunity Plan), allow residentialzoning categories and'densities that are censistest with the City's General Plan. A-103 DRAFT Foit DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The basic develquent standards contained in these plans are generally JON consistent, although they have been tailored .to meet the specific needs identifies! within each of the community planning areas. In the Terra Vista and Victoria Community Plans, provisions have been added to' allow cluster development in the Low Mediums and Yedium residwetial categories. (Cluster development is automatically assumed in the higher density categories.) ln,`addition, both plans have been designed.to allcw flexibility in trading densities among different areas within each plan without requirinj a General Plan Ameniment as long as the maxims densitty permitted by the plan is not exceedefi. Both plans permit each residential land use designation to be stepped up or down one category, except for the Nediume residential category which allows two steps up, to either the Medium High or High density range. Scmewhat different fron the Terra Vista and Victoria Community Plans, the Develogarent Code and gtiwanda Specific Plan utilize the application of a density range concept. This concept allows for the use of basic and optional development standards. Projects which meet the minimum basic standards are permitted to develop at densities which are at the lower end of each density range. Projects which meet the generally more demanding Optional Standards, in terms of greater'provision of oRen space, buffering, and recreational area facilities may develop at the higher end of each density range. As a trade- off, under 'the Optional Standards irny of the development requirements, including setbacks and lot coverage, `'a�:a reduced to accommodate the higher densities. other standards such as parking and height requirements generally do not provide constraint to development except in the more sensitive hillside areas where height: Ore limited to 30 feet. However, throughout the remainder of the City, heights are generally permitted to increase with increased density. Parking is based upon the unit type and number of bedrooms, with carports permitted in multi-family developments'with approval from the Design Review Committee. ASh i A-104 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AOL Overall then, the City's development standards are based upon acceptable provisions and are not exceptional or unusual, and in fact are consistent with those of surroundirg comunities. The provisions allowed' under the Terra Vista, Victoria, and Caryn Community Plans are somewhat less demanding than i ; those contained 'Lt he City's Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Pl n, but this reflects the unique community character within each of these ;i-anning areas, In fie, the variability of development standards allowed through implementation of the City's Land Use plan, Development Oistr+?t leap, and Coma,unity Plans permits a wide variety of housing types to ',:a provided, including single and' multi-family, rental and ownership, as well as mobile homes. As a result, application of these development standards on the remaining vacant land resources will continue to enab a .broad range of housing alternatives aad the ability for the City to meta its share of the Regional housing treed as €hwm in table A-15. B. Building Codes and Enforcement: Aft to The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted, by refe,-ence, the State Uniform, Administrative, Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Housing, Building Security, Uniform Sign and Abatement for Oangtirous Building Codes. These codes are considered to be the minimum necessary to protect the public's health, safety, and welfare. Additional standards, ,NFPA 130 and 13R of the National Fire Protection Association, have been adopted which require that all new residential dwellings be constructed with an installed sprinkler system. This is required in order to protect the public's health, safety, and welfare and is not considered an unnecessary constraint to housing. A discussion of housing code enforcement is contained in Section 9 of this chapter. In addition to the ;standard code enforcement practices, the City encourages the preservation of significant historic structures through application of the State Historic Building Code, Title 24, Part 8, of the California Administrative Code which permits the use of original or arc6il t rmaterials in reconstruction. Also, the City utilizes the options available._n A-105 D" FOR DISCUSSION PIJRPOSES ONE.`k, Section x2-33 of t . `California Adtinistrati.vz Code, which allows an'a�Yaicy to' exercise °reasonal.Ie judgement In the appiica}ion of requirements" regarding the continued use of existing'structures. As the majority i.e., 93 percent - of the City's housing stock was built after 1960, and with 85 percent constructed since 1970, it is in'relatively good condition with few buildings needing repair or reconstruction. However, for those structures which do need' repair, he City enforces those standards and regulations which ensure reasonable and adequate life ;safety, but allows the 'exercise of judgemt in application of standards and regulations as permitted in the code so as to not unduly ^enalize oider dwellings that were built under less demanding codes. C. Residential Review Process: The City's standard; sreview process, from the time of 'formal application submittal. through review :by the Planning Commission is an eleven creek process. This includes review before the various recoasen[ ng review ANIL committees including the Grading, Technical Review, Design Review, and Trails Committees when applicable. The process is set up so that all 'W the necessary reviewing departments, irxluding Building and Safety, Engineering, Community Services, iff, and the Fire Department are involved in project rerieu from the earliest stages. As a result, City agencies function in a coordinated manner and the applicant is appraised of any concerns early in the eview process. I This review format is used for all types of projects including industrial, commercial. and residential. Mile the actual review process way extend beyond the eleven week period in some cases due to the complexity of the pri,ject, identified significant environmental issues or inadequate plans it doe, not vary in length for single family as compared to multi-family projacts. In fact, it is often those single family projects located in envirc*,zentaliy sensitive areas that take longer'to review. Allk A-10S DR A�1 T FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Although the review process is not typically longer for multi-family type projects, staff can investigate methods by which it may be possible to reduce even further the length of the review time for multi-family projects with affordable'-units proposed. Therefore, Program 8.A.3 has been included to the five year action plan which states that the City shall evaluate the review processing procedure to allow expedited review for affordable projects utilizing 20 percent set aside funds or for multi-family projects with units affordable to lover and moderate income households. D. Schools: As a result of the rapid growth prior to incorporation the local school districts have in the past and still face severe overcrowding. To assure for adequate school_ space, 'the City requires developers to obtain written certification from elementary and high school districts in which the project site is located stating that adequate school capacity is available before a residential tract map is recorded and/or building permits are issued. The concern among the . school districts- is their inability to finance the construction of new school facilities since Proposition 13. The districts are currently relying on developers fees to gay.-for the cost of temporary facilities for new students. Prior to 1987, the City required written certification twill serve letters) from elementary and high school districts stating that adequate school facilities_were available. In this system, each school district determined the amount of the developer fee to be charged,on a per unit basis for single- family and multi-family developments. With the approval of new legislation (AB 2926 and related amendments, AB 1929 of 1988 and AB 181 of 1989), -Which became effective on January 1, 1987, a state mandated local program was imposed which also required written certification by the appropriate school distri,Lt but sets specific limits on the fee amounts. In addition, fees are now also required for commercial and A-107 /Cas� DRAFT " FOR DiSCUSSiON PURPOSES 614LY industrial developments as well as for residential projects. The maximum fees imposed were originally set by the State and may be increased every t.jo years according to adjustment for inflation. The bill also established a method for providing interim classroom facilities when overcrowding conditions exist. A city' may require the dedication of land, payment of in-lieu fees or a combination of these two as a condition of approval. As a result, the individual districts maylrequire fees in addition to those set by the State. As shown in Tabi a A-27�i two of the five school districts, Etiwanda and Cucamonga, require fees in;addition to those set by the State. TAW.E A-27 SCHOOL FEES FOR COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIA.L AND REcIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REQUIRED BY RANCHO CUCAMQNG4- S-I"PMO i. DISTRICTS AS OF MAY 1990 Dislrict Commercial/industrial Sgsidentiai Additional Fees Alfa Loma $.18/aq.Ft. $.48/Sq.Ft Central $.18/Sq.Ft. $1.08/Sq.Ft.' Cucamonga $.18/Sq.Ft $1.08/Sq.Ft. $2,000/du ctiwanda $.18/Sq.Ft $1.08/Sq.Ft. $1,758.94/du Chaffee Joint Union High School $.08/Sq.Ft $.48/8q.Ft. Th)Central,Cucamonga and Eliiwanda School Districis have indicated that they win be raising their resi. dermal fees to$1.10 as of June 1,1990. The Alta Lonna School District is currardly in the process of evaluating their tee amounts and may raise them sometime in the future. A-108 DRAFT E. Develo pment Fees: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The City oi_y-_. ancho Cucamonga charges-a number of fees which affect the price of housing. However, the fees such as drainage, schools, sewer, and water are necessary for pudic safety and for the City and :other public agencies to maintain an adequate level of public servit-,s for new development. Table A-28 illustrates fees in Rancho Cucamonga for a 1,266 square foot single family home with a 2-car garage on an 8,000 square foot lot. The fees total $10,435.30 and represent 7.7 percent of the total -cost of a new hone at a price of $136,000.8 i 8 Information provided by Great Western Real Estate. The median sales price for a home in Rancho 'Cucamonga in 1989 was $136,000 with a square footage of 1,265 feet. A-109 / 11 pRAF t TABLE A-28 F'OR' DISCUSSK,%q pURpCSES ONLY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FEES (1265 SQUARE FOOT HOME,2 CAR GARAGE,8,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT,NO DECKS OR PATIOS,IN THE LOW DENSITY iESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) Uooft C"St Building Permit $439.50 Plan Check $329.63 i Drainage $900.00 Systems Fees $704.00 Beautification $333.00 Park $1,566.57 Water and Sewer $4,190.00 Alta Loma Schoo,District (See Table A-27) $1,36600 Chaffee Joint Union High School District $607.20 Total $10,435.90 Source: 1989 Building Department Fee Schedule A-�110 i;y DRAFT F. Annexations: FoR DISCUS81ON PURPOUZS C`IriLY The City is currently. 36.5 square miles in size and is approximately 60 percent developed. , Since 1984 the-City has annexed an estimated 2.2 square miles of residential land in the northern sphere area. Of the remaining vacant, uncommitted residential acreage in the City (2,533.74 acres) approximately 28.6 percent, or 724.81 acres, allows for a deq ity of 8 dwelli,ig units or greater. For this reason, annexations are currently not necessary to provide adequate sites for affordable housing. In addition, much of the land in the City's sphere area is in hillside terrain and 'therefore will probably be developed at lower densities and have increased costs due to structural design requirements. i G. Water Supply:.\ The existing water supply system presents no immediate constraints in housing. development. The Cucamonga County Water' District's (CCWD) area includes over 50 square miles of which Rancho Cucamonga occupies .75 percent. In 1987 the ( , CCWD updated their,Water System Master Plan. The future water demands for the District, were ,derived from proj�ted population growth and rWnd use. The,, demand in 1987 was estimated at 26.700 Acre Feet W) and was projected to- increase to an annual requirement of over 38,000 AF in 1990 and to almost 46,000 AF in 1995. The District's total annual demane is estimated to increase to over 170 percent to 73,000 AF at the time of ultimate build-out (estimated as 2015). In addition, the District's present ma;�im,nn day demand of 46 million gallons per day (mgd) is predicted to increase rapidly to more than 68 mgd in 1990, and to almost 82 mgd -in 1995 and to over 130 'mgd at ultimate develop;ent. A-111 i DRAFT - FOR DI"US,ION I f�UppO,Eg ONiY The District has .three sources of supply ground water, local surface- (Canyon) water, and imported surface water through, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). Groundwater is currently the primary source of supply fir the district. However, as the local groundwater and canyon sources are already near the,,e maximum sustainable yields, imported surface water w1ll become a primary source of water in the future.. The District has estimated that approximately,45,000 AF 3fwater will be needed at the time of ultimate development and that sufficient water will be available from MWD, to meet the projected demand. Therefore, the existing water supply ' system presents Ito immediate constraint toward the future devel'vpment of housing. H. Sewer Systems: A limited capacity of .the existinC, sewer system can present a short term constraint on housing dev;^1opment. The Cucamonga County Water District Sewer System Master Plan, which Was prepared in 1986, encompasses the City of Rancho Cucamonga, City of Ontario and surrounding unincorporated land in San Bernardino County. Currently, all exi'sting CCWD wastewater flows to the Chino Basin Municipal Water District Regional Treatment Plant,,,,No. 1 (RP1). The capacity at RPl is currently 32 mgd and is in the process of'being expanded to 44 mgd, with an exo I completion date of the fall of 1990. The ultimate capacity at RP1 is j, `fLr 96 qgd, however, flow projections indicate that 120 mgd will be ne.z4,L,j to handle ultimate development ,of the service area. To handle these additional: flows, an additional treatment plant (RP4)' is planned in order to handle the treatment capacity deficiency, and will have a capacity of 28 mgd. Therefore, although a limited capacity of the existing sewer system can present -;;.art term constraint to housing development. At appears that there will be sufficient capacity in the system to meet th�l projected -mand. Ak + A-112 DRAFT x. nood Protection: FOR DISCUSS910N F, ,P-POSES ONLY Alk Inadequate and missing drainage facilities present 'a major constraint to development-in the City. _ Aere'are'various levels of drainage facilities that are required to provide adequate flood-.protection.'!, + As shown in Map A-6, the larger Regional and Secondary Flood"-Control Channels such as Day Creek, Deer " Creek and Etiwanda/San Sevaine are owned and maintained by the San_Bernardino, County Flood , '-trot District to which the City contributes a share, which is funded thr ...,dd the co`I.l ecti on of drainage feel." Master plan fac3l iti es and local drainage facilities ere City owned and operated. Typically, Ovelopment is required to construct these new master plan and local facilities from the City, also through the collection>5f drainage fees. I ! l r �1� t 1. r; 'i r .tirvw �w '►�►'mil .�'.. ?_ �t f� ti « s r , DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY `=1 In the, ctiwanda/San Se,vaine Drainage Master Plan area, development south of- Highland Avenue cannot occur until new drainage facilities are installed. The Cost for the new facilities is generally beyond the financial capabilities of an individual developer and will require long-term financing commitments, such as the establishment of assessment diitricts as permitted in the 1982 Mell a- Roos Community Facilities Act and the Improvement Act of 1913. l!irket CGnstraints Rising housing costs are a constraint to providing adequate housing for all economic segments of the community. Between 1970 and 1980 the increase in housing costs rose 'thr,e times the growth rate of household incomes. This increase has forced renters and homebuyers to spend-grater proportions of their monthly income for housing and to seek smaller, less expensive units. t , According to the 1980 census, the mean value of non-condominium housing was $89,733. Based on the infoMition from the TRW Real Estate Market Information Service, the average house 9 price in Rancho Cucamonga in 1989, including new and resale condominiums and single-family units, was $170,927. This represents an increase in `housing,`costs by 90.4 percent. Assuming the buyer is able to put 20 percent dawn and the mortgage rate is 10.5 percent, the monthly payment including principal and interest, tax and insurance would be approximately 1,477.5 per month. The qualifying income for this mortgage would be approximately 59,100 per year, based or.'maximum monthly payments equal to 30 percent of the gross household inc--.,e.' Land prices, construction costs, and financing are major factors which contribute to the price of housing. Tip* folIovin; is_a discussion of those factors as they affect housing availability in Rancho Cucamonga,. i i A-115 DRAFT A. Land and Construction CostslrO,-i DISCUSSION PURPOSES'DNt Y Local residential develo•2rs wfth �� variety of unit types; i planning and construction phase!50n tle C',tywatt'surveyed in January, 198�t by the Planning Division staff to determin ; raw land prices and construction costs. These costs averaged approximate3y Sao per square foot for both single-family and multi-family projects, but land prices varied by District as shown on Table A 29. As. the density range land increases so does the price. However, in terms of land cost per dwelling unit, the "VL" District (less than 2 dwelling i units/at,re) is the most expensive. Public improvements, not included in the land prices shown, are also high pre unit with lower density projects. L- TABLE A-2 9 ESTIMATED LAND COSTS BY DISTR9DT, 1984 rCost Range Distil per Acre VL(less tlnan 2du/ac) $35 40,000 =r j L(2-4 duiac) $50-80,000 LM(4-8 dtl;ac) $80 100,000 j M(6-14 dp.'lac) $10a-135,000 MH(14-24 du/ac) $160.175,000 H(24-30 iiu/ao) $175,000+ r Source:(!fanning DivW*n Staft 5ucvey of focal developers,January+M4 A-116 DRAFT F oR DISCUSSION PURF'C:SES ONLY Recent estimates of land costs have been devel-aped based on the assessed„value- of actual land sales, which were obtained from Chicago Title and estimates provir'71 by Lewis Homes. Land prices are generally higher than they were in 1984 particularly in the Wtltiple Family Residential district, as shown in Table A-30. r i, TABLE A-30 ESTIMATED LAND COSTS BY DISTRiCT, 1989 Cost Rangy District tZone) Affikk VL(less than 2 du/ac) $31-90,000 L&LM(2-8 du/ac) $60-100,000 M(8-14 du/ac) $120-190,000 MM&H(1.4-30 du/ac) $140-200.000 Source: Planning Division Staff survey utilizing infon=tion from Cttioago Title as well as information from the Lewis Homes Development Company I Re 117 6 it B. Financing: DAFT FOR ®I:CUSSION pURpO ,^ ONLY In order to obtain information on the a allat faty of financing in the Caoeunity, the City has surveyed the twelve lendin�'g institutions that have offices or branch offices located in Rancho C-ucamon�ta. lire banks ewere i questioned regarding the general availability of financir+g� n all areas of the City and the possibility that interest rates varied for different areas of the community. In addition, the' City was able to obtain from more of "7zhe institutions, copies of their 1990 Community Reinvestment Act Statements, (Nome Fed Vine yard National Bank, and bank of faserica). As a result, the City was provided with csrbal an6 written statements by these institutions affirming that their lending rractices are based upon each individual applicants creditworthiness without reg�rd`to such-factors as sex, race, age., marital status, or without regard to income level or racial composition of an area or the ap r location of a duelling. Also, based upon evidence of construction activity on available vacant land, residential financing appears to be generally available throughout the City. There i- no evidence of any mortgage deficient areas of ;sear construction or rehabilitation loans. In addition, the City alrea4y offers and will continue to offer, a repair grant program for senior and disabled or handicapped peisons for minor housing needs as well as a housing rehabilitation and repair loan program that offers both deferred loan payments and low interest loans to lower income households, through the Commnity Develo pment Black Grant Program. It is apparent that a la ,,te proportion of the City's households aw. and will continue to be priced 'out of the housing market. Because the factors contributing to the high cost are largely beyond the City's contro% the home ownership market will remain beyond the financial capability of a large number of households in the City. lberefore, the City will have to take an active role in providing a limited (because of limited- resources) number of housing units. A-118 i, FrJR E?€$CUSS€o. N Posr- ONLY XI EVALUATION OF THE HQUSING ELEKENT'S PAST GOAL, POLICIES, OBZIECTIVES AND PROOF 1 This section provides a review of the appropriateness and effectiveness of the previous goal, policies, and programs contained in the 1984 Housing ,Element Update. The following are same of the significant results of this review; Ii An estimated 11.7 percent of the employees surveyed in 1989 live and work in the City. This percentage is expected'to increase as the large amount of,vacant commercial and industrial land develops over the next several years. * The City has provided assistance for the repair and rehabilitation of exi=*� ffordable hti ing stock through the use of. Comrunity Developme)t Block Grant F6,nds. i.1 t * A wide variety of ho- ing unit typ's has been encouraged through g implementation of the Land Use plan, Development District Map and the Community plans on the vacant land resources of the City. * Since 1984, 52.7 percent of the housing constructed° in Terra Vista has been affordable to persons making 120 percent or less of the area median income. t . A-119/ DRAFT FOR DiSC;USSION PURPOSES ONLY Section 65588 of the Government Code requires that each local government review its housing element on a periodic basis and that as part of this review, the appropriateness and effectiveness of the previous goals, policies, objectives, and programs be evaluated. The analysis should include a review of the actual results of the previous housing program and should contain an analysis of the difference between what was projected and what was accomplished. 'The overall go31 of the 1984 Housing Element revision was is follows:, The City shall provide opportunities and incentives for the provision of a variety of housing types sr all economic segimts wishing to s-eside ih�the camunity regardless of ra.��religion, sax, or income group. In the previous (`1e0ent. three policy statexents :acre identified as generally contributing tWw,174 pursuit of the City's,i,hoising goal. However, policy statements are ini2endeo to serve as guides to decision making toward achievement of objectives as well as contributing toward the overall goal'. As a result, as part of the element update, these and ad�,itional policy statements were more specifically written to serve as guides toward achievement of specific objectives. Throughout the last five years, since 1984, t" City has made strides towards accomplishing the above stated goal._ This has occurred primarily through implementation of the seven objectives and related policies and programs contained ib the 1984 Housing Element which are discussed below. OBJECTIVE 1 Promote and encourage housing opportunities so that is is desirable for 30 percent of the projected commercial and industrial employed households in the City to live and work in the City. A- 12O 46 j )I DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The intent for establishment of this objective is two fold. The first is to provide employment and adequate housing for persons,,who wish to work and live in this area. The second is to provide employment and housing,in proximity to one another so commuter patterns are lessened, thus having a beneficial effect on air quality, congestion management, public transit and general energy efficiency. By accomplishing the second purpose of this objective, the City will also be contritl�tllng efforts toward aceompY?shment of a regional jobs/housing balance, wiifch is one of the goals �ontaf5ed in SCAG's Growth Management Plan. Implicitly included iii this objective is also the determination of a realistic capture rate for the City. A capture rate of 30 percent is considered to be the maximum number; f employees that the City could realistically expect to live and work in Rancho Cucamonga at any one time. In 1980, approximately 10 percent of the residents employed in Rancho Cucamonga also worked in the City. However, it,,,a recent survey of the 21 largest employers in Rancho Cucamonga, these companies were found to have a capture rate of approximately 11.7 percent, representing only a slight increase over the 1980 figure: This Alk continued low capture rate may be due to the increased cost of housing in recent years and the still large amounts of undeveloped commercial and industrial land in the City. A step toward achieving the City's maxitmim capture rate may be realized thre-ugh the continued monitoring of Rancho Cucamonga's major employers and newly "proposed commercial`')and industrial developments ar,well as the-' development and implementation- of programs that would-encourage or assist locally generated employees to live in the City. ACTION: As this objective is determined to be Hof iiportantp in assisting the City achieve an appropriate Jobs/housing balance, it shall be continued in the revised element. Several programs, 4.A.1 through 4.A.5, which serve as a means to better track and assist it' the achievement of a higher capture rate, have been included in the element. QA-121/CQ_ i �I DRAFT FItt Rl6M 1.1 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY ietermine the income levels of future comercial and industrial emp'lgye" households in order to identify the affordable housing ranges in all incme groups of the, expected new households. A one time study of the 21 largest employers in the City'was completed in 1989 to evaluate the number of local employees who currently reside in Rancho Cucamonga. It was found that 11.7 percent of the employees surveyed bath live and work in the City. However, this survey did not evaluate the wage or salary levels of these employees. As a result, it is not known how many employees cannot afford to IIve in the City as opposed to those who choose to live elsewhere. As this information is important in determining a'=realistic capture rate and assessing future housing needs, it is.recommended that it be included in future studies, Y This program should be developed to accomplish two dims. First, to determine the number of existing employees who live and work in the City, and secondly to assess the future employee base and housing needs. Therefore, monitoring and review of existing major employers as well as monitoring or new commercial and ir.dustrial employers should occur on an annual basis. The program would require employers to provide the City with information regarding the City of residence of their employees as well as the number of future projected employees, ,c ployee job classifications, wage and salary ranges, and the number of emloyees.with secondary incomes, ACTION: As a result pf,tie above analysis, Program 1..1 was eliminated and two more specific Programs, 4.A.1 and 4.A.2, were included in the revisedi element to better°address monitoring of new and existing employers. i A-122 13--197 DRAFT PROGRAM 1.2 FOR DiSCUSSIC<\l F''IRFG.riES Q(`ILY Expand the City's data base eanagement system to include a residential, industrial, and commercial monitoring system of proposed projects. This program has seen completed.- The City routinely compiles information fo. a Monthly Status Report, which tracks the status of all on-going projects, and is available in tabular form. In conjunction with the Monthlar Status Report, the Planning Oivison produces a Residential Application and a Commercial/Industrial Applications Map: These maps are updated periodically and provide a graphic representation of the Monthly Status Report. As a result of this information, the City is better able to keep an accurate record J of all ongoing development and; is also able to provide information tr prospective honey yers regardirq new residential projects which are in the process. This program should be c� t_Mued. ACIsDH: As a result of the success of this; program in tracking on-going projects, it is to be —cuntinue+Y as Program 4.A.5 in the revised element. PROGRAM 1.3 ",evelop an "equity share" ;program for focal employment participation. The intent of this program was to encourage local employers to assist i employees in the purchase of a new home. Generally, in an equity sharing sittation, an investor (employer or City) would assist ii the financing of a home, usually by contributing to a down payment, with the result that all parties share the equity on the title. This type of .program could be generally useful in situations where a company generates a large numb.r_.�,low to moderate income employees. I A-123 DRAFT FOR LD[s;OJSSION PURPOSES ONLY i An equity share program has not been actively pu;-sued by the City. However,' it is a program which could be utilized to assist in the provision. of affordable housing and could become even more attractive If the results of the employer survey show a large disparity b -i employee incomes and housing costs. ACTION: Therefore, this prGgra0 sPoall be continued as 4.A.3, but is to be mc4ified in such a oranner that it wil I be developed based upon the results of the monitoring required in previous programs. In addition to the program,mpntioned Iabove, addit*;anal encouragement ;and assistance should be provided tb local employees'-to meet their housing needs.: One method could involve the development of a housing information service. An example of this program would be to require developers to provi-de announcements to local em;:-Dyers of housing units for sale or rent 30 days\J! prior to offering the units to the generel public. These announcements would G• posted in places of local employment. ACTION: As a means toxard assisting local employees to meet their housing needs. a housing information program. 4.A.4, shall be added to the revised element. OBJEC71VE 2 Conserve and improve the existing housing stock, and eliminate the causes and `spread of blight and deterioration by encouraging the investment of public and private funds in housing rehabilitation and public improvements. In addition to the provision of new housing it is imperative that the existing housing stock and the few older neighborhoods in the City be maintained in � good condition to ensure a continued supply of quality affordable hcus�ng. j i ` A-I24 'C./ rf DRAFT FOR DISCUSSiON PURL-OSES ONLY The majority of the programs which are utilized to address the needs' ' identified in this objective are met through the C9BG program. As part of this program, specific areas or pop��lations it' ?need are targeted for assistance. Program objectives are evaluated on a'yearly basis'bised on the identified need. Assistance has either been provided directly to lower income and/or special need groups, n the form of, housing rehabilitation loans or grants, or has been, used to provide public improvements, such as street improvemE:�ts, street lig,M1}s, sidewalks, and parkway landscaping. These additions improve the living environments in older neighborhoods and prevent the deterioration of the transportation infrastructure. ACTION: As the preservation of the existing housing stock is of, great importance in contributing toward rmintaining the City's- affordable housing stock, it is necessary that this objective be continued. However. a provision shall be added which specifically audresses the preservation of historic structures. In addition, a new program, 2.A.1, has been added to the revis0l, element to address historic rehabilitation. PWWJMM 2.1 Identify areas of the City with concentrations of older housing unity which way be targeted for rehabilitation and improvement programs This,program has been completed. Five target areas have been identified and include East and West Northtown, Southwest Cucamonga, Old Alta Loma, and Etiaanda south of Foothill. These are generally small areas, much less than a census tract. Because of the mix of older and newer development in each tract, onl-;; two of these areas, East andWest Northtown, were reported in th 1980 census as having nver 51 percent of the households, earning less thar. 80 percent of the regional median househld income and therefore were; eligible to receive assistance in the form of upgraded public improvements. In 1985, the CiSy' commissioned a survey off--1 Old Alta Loma and Southwest Cucamonga to determine whether any, portion of these areas could be shown to be over 51 A-125 DRAFT" FOR DlSCUSS10N PURPOSES ONLY percent low and moderate income households. Only a portion on one street in f Old :Alta Loma clearly qualified, while several in Southwest Cucamonga did. It remains to be seen whether Northtown will again qualify as a lower income neighborhood in the 1990 census. However, the City should cxmtinue to evaluate possible target areas including Ctwanda, south of Foothill Boulevard. ACTION: As a result, this program shall be continued in the revised element 'S Program 2.B.,1, to allow the City to assist targeted areas with rehabilitation and iaprovem�ent programs. PROGRAM 2.2 Develop a Redevelopment .;aency rehabilitation loan program which RaoulG, provide rehabilitation and repair assistance to low and moderate income households. This program was never developed. tinder current restrictions imposed by the Western Center for Law and Poverty Settlement, any housing, unit which receives assistance from the Agency's 20 percent set aside fund muse remain affordable for at least 30 years. This "restriction effectively eliminaUts the feasibility of a conventional rehabilitation ;oan program, since it would limit the homeowner's equity growth for that 30 year period. However, the Redevelopment Agency will consider a program for non-profit purchase and i rehabilitation of existing housing under the 20 percent set aside RDA Housing Strategy that may allow a version of this program to work. ACTION: As this program is no longer possible due to the provisions of the ,i settlement with the Western Center for Law and Poverty, it shall be discontinued. However, Programs 5.A.7 and 9-'. .I, which address the '£ develepadat of the Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing Strategy and j revisions to the Housing Element to ensure consistency with the strategy, shall be added to the revised element. AM A-126 J PROMtM2.3 FT em s' DISCUSSIoI� Pur-zPt s,ES ONLY, Operate a repair `9K,.ic program for senior citizens and disablad or bandicappp,a persons for minor haasing.needs. The City has exceeded the original ;,target of providing assistance to. 20 houseViolds on an annual basis,, for a total of 100 grants. In fact, in the last five years the City has Oro videll a total. of 184 grants. The grant program is a method of assisting lower income, and special needs households improve the quality of their housing and ;prevent the deterioration of the housing stock which otherwise might result from a lack of resources. ACTION: As this prngram has been successfully utilized and it is anticipated that it will continue to be so, it should be`continued as part of the revised element as Program 2.9.2. PROGRAM 2.4 Operate a housing rehabilitation and repair loan agras that offers both deferred loan payments and low 'interest loans to lox income households. The loan programs utilized by the City are further described below: a. The Low Interest Loan Program provides amortized )ow-interest loans to owners of single-family residences occupied by lower income persons, excluding mobile homes. A--12-7'y RAr-T FOR DISCUSSiON, PURPOSES ONLY b. The Deferred Loan.Program provides non-amortized loans to senior' citizens, households headed by handicapped persons and very low, income families who are owner-occupants of single-family residences, excluding mobile homes.. The loans are due and payable upon sale of the home. In the last five years the City has provided-a total of 14 loans to qualified persons. This is significantly below the anticipated target of 20 loans on an annual basis for a total of 100 loans over the last- 5 years. The` reason for the low usage of the program may be due in large part to the fact that the program was County run and it ats not aggressively publicized. In addition, the County generally did not emphasize the availability of the deferred payment loans and instead focused on low interest, single item rehabilitation Loans. As a result of concern with the lack of interest and usage of the loans, the City, as of fiscal year 1989-90, has opted t6 take over :the running of the program. The intent is to focus more heavily on use of deferred loans for more extensive, , aomprehensive repairs. In fact, it is anticipated that 75 AM percent of the available money will be used for a deferred loan program. ACTION: It is therefore recommended that'this program be continued with modifications as discussed above, and included as Program 2.8.3 of the revised el eme,nt. MOGRM 2.5 Provide public improvements/coustnity facilities such as street improvements, street ligb'ts, sidewalks, and parkway landscaping, in qualified target areas. By repairing and upgrading public improvements in the Northtowm and Southwest Cucamonga areas and in combination with low interest loans and grants, the City hopes to encourage private investment- in the area and to ensure all residents a safe and pleasant living environment. A-128 DRAFT / FOR DISCUSSION P RPOSES (�b Since 1980, necessary public improvements .have been added to the Otfkyown 1p target area. In fiscal year 1987-88, manor public improvements were completed in the Northxown area and the City's focus shifted to Southwest Cucamonga, As of 1989, b streets in Southwest Cucamonga were in the process ofbeing upgraded. Typically, improvements involved resurfacing_'the >street and construction of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. "Where needed improvements also, included installation of street lights as well as water and sewer < improvements, ACTION: It is recommended that this program he"continued and that improvement of public infrastructure fn the Southwest Cucamonga area be completed. Further, the City should continue to determine additional target areas ;n needy of further improvement including Old Alta Loma and Etiwanda, south of Foothill Boulevard. Program 2.C.I has been included ig�;ihe element. 08JECTIVE 3: Allow and create new opportunities vdii ch enable a broad range of housing- types, site .designs, construction methods, and maintain a balanced supply of ownership and rental units. _ The City's General Plan allows for a broad range. ofhousing types including owner and rental, which will allow opportunities for the development of housing at all income ranges. Development of the City's vacant land resources in the past five years ha;a allowed for a mix of unit types. Additionally, maintenance of the City's existing supply of 1rental stock is accomplished through i -_' g implementation of a Condominium Canversion' Ordinance. A-129 13 r DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AC1'IONa: As this xijective has been successful in furthering the City's overall housing goal of providing 'a variety of housing types for all economic. segme 'ts" 'of the community, it shall be continued. Also, to help meet this ob11e<,tive, t.vo addtional programs- MA.2 and 3.A.3) have been added' to the- ' revised element to address the supply°znd maintenance of mobile homes ip, :,oe City, as the previous element did not specificx'11y address mobile h0es:% PROGRAM 3.1 The City shall facilitate the opportunity for 3 variety of housing hypes through the implak'ntation 'of the Land Use Plan, Development District Map and the Cqmaunity Plans on the remaining vacant land resources of the City. In the last five.,years, since 1984 through 1989, the City has experienced a tremendous surge of growth. In this time, the housings E: increased a total of 15,244 units, as estimated by the State Depart�'?,ent-of Finance, which has far exceeded the City's estimated target of 8,028 units in this same time period, and in fact has exceeded the 1983 RHAM estimate f v� 1989 of 12,d42Ask units. Based upon Building' and .Safety records for this same time period, of the total number of dwelling 1Anits issued permits, approximately 33.5 percent were for apartment units. As comparison, in the five years preceding, from 1979 through 1983, the number of multi-family apartments, constructed totaled 24 percent of the total development. It is anticipated, based upon the remaining vacant residential :and, that a large proportion 64 the new housing construc'zed in the City will be at densities of 8 deglling units to the:acre or greater which indicates a higher percentage of m0 ti-family product. This indicates that the City's growth is follo,jing a sMtdard pattern of residential development in expanding urban areas. That is, the predominance of single family development occurs early in a connunity's growth, to to followed by multi-family infill type development. i'his development is r facilitated through the use of 'multiple zoning' categories which allow for a' broad range of densities, from less than 2 dwelling units per acre up to 30 Ask A-130 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION P►.JRP',.��E Q S �1 dwelling units per, acre. In addition, Se r%e o�'Yasic and optional• jMk development standards, as permitted in the Development Coii,:.and Etiwanda Specific Plan, allow a range of development from the lower to the upper ends of etch zoning district density range. ,7he basic development standards are typically used for development at densit%es Tess than the mid-point ((jf each zoning "distric2.range, whereas optional standards are utilized for development at, densities above the midrange ofeach district. Further, the range of housing types is also Facilitated through the implementation of the Terra Vista, Victoria, and Carjn Community Plans, as standards contained in these plans allow for further clustering of development as well as some flexibility in setting land use densities. ACTION: It is recommended then, that the City skoul•d continue to encourage the development of a mix of rc-al1ential 'unit types without allowing one unit type to predominate to ,the detriment of the other. The continued implementation of the City's Land Use Plan, Developcaent Code, and Community Plans will ensure a guide range of residential unit *SYPes. As a result, this program has been continued as Program 3.A;.T in the revised.,element. PROMAM 3 Maintain ' and adiminister a condominium conversion ordinance which establishes a maximum ,-nnual limit for the number oif multi-family rental units that may b converted to ownership type A condominium conversion ordinance becomes necessary in a market when the construction of new residential units, single-family and multi-family is reduced, whether as a result of"national economic trends or a reduction in the amount of developable land. The conversion of existing rental apartments to condominiums for sale as ownership units reduces the stock of rental units, thereby resulting in a .demand which exceeds the available supply. This in turn, can lead to increased rental payments. A-131 �J i DRAFT FOR r-)iS4::USS A PURpocz r To date, only one project in the City has applied to convert froommi�aartment to an ownership type of housing. In this particular case, the &her had originally buiit the complex to condominium standards and therefore did not require variances or significant changes to the project design to meet the necessary standards. Additionally, the ,owner had indicated,that the purpose for, processing the convert r,i was due to a high vacancy rate and the: hope that the change would entice additional occupancy. It is not anticipated t"t;;-urge number of apartment projects will attempt to convert in the near future. However, an interest in_condominium conversions may increase once the City approaches build,-out or if the national economic climate changes significantly with interest rates increasing dramatical ly. ACTIOW: Therefore, in order to minimize the number of apartment units shish could convert to condominiu&. ther6y reducing the stock of affordable housing, the, City should continue to vaintain its Condominium ;Conversion Ordinanr and has been included as Program 3.B.1 in the revised element. -, !! ➢tent., I OBJECTIVE 4: Promote energy efficiency in all residential developments. In addition to a monthly mortgage or rant payment,.,expenses incurred for energy and resources consumed in the home are also major factors contributing to the overall housing cost. Implementation, of energy conservation measures may therefore help reduce the cost of housing in addition to helping conserve ever more precious natural resources. ACTION: Therefore, as attainment of this objntive will help contribute toward the provision of affor4iable housing for all unit types, it should be continu ;d in the revised element. In addition to the programs currently used to implernant this objective, an additional program, 7.A.3, shall be added as a A-132 �t DRAB FC70k DISCUSSION PURPQSLS ONLY �N means toward increasing the public's awareness and utq ization of energy saving techniques. PROGRAM 4.1 l Enforce and regulate the existing State residential ' energy design guidelines through existing California State Building Cade. a i The. State �---"California :established basic energy e��,ciency standards for V. residential stroctures in Title 24 bf the California Administrative Code which ' became effective June, 1983. These standards, which were updated in June, 1988, involve two basic requirements - the installation of a list of mandatory measures representing minimum conservation features and devices, and demonstration that the building's predicted annual energy u_=-neets a designated energy budget for space heating and cooling and water heating. These requirements are uniformly enforced for all new residential devel opments ACTIOMi. Incompliance with State Law and. to ensure ever efficiency this tIY Y program shall be continued as Program 7.A.1 in the revised Housing Element. i PROGRAFM 4.2 Implement through the Development Code energy efficient design procedures and specifications for such things as solar techniques. landscaping standards, house orientatirrj and sun angle exposure. In addition to the provisions required as part of Title 24, the City has incorporated energy conservation standards and policies as part of the Municipal Code in Sections 17.08.040.H.1 and 2,` and 17.08.060.G. Mewevep; Although it has been found that the solar standards for site development, such as sun angle and house orientation may rot be as important in maximizing sot-,;, A-133 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY efficiency as structural code requirements and unit design. 'However, the site. development standards and policies should be maintained as they do contribute toward achieving solar energy efficiency and encourage thoughtfulaess in the site design early in the development process. ACTION: It is :recommended then, that this program be ccntinued as 7.A.2 in the revised element. In 1dition to the faro rams discussed revic�Vsly, the City has also �'� P►'o9 P � Y utilized methods to encc,-gage resource conservation UWr ugh the implementation of new standards and public information efforts. In 1989'. the City developed and adopted a Xeriscape Ordinance which requires reduced consumption of water in landscapes for all new commercial, industrial, and multiple family residential developments. In addition, in 1987, the City developed w9del home landscape criteria which requires all new residential developments with more f than 2 models to landscape one model entirely with water saving landscape and irrigation. Each 'hater saving" model must also contain identifying signage and displays describing the water saving techniques used. ACTION: The City should continue to encourage energy conservation measures through public education programs and by encouraging other types of conservation techniques. Therefore, Program 7.A.3 has been included in the " revised element to ensure the continuation of public infomation efforts and the develap;�mt of conservation techniques. "f OBJECTIVE 5: `i Provide housing opportunities whith meet the needs of households of low and moderate incomes and identify special need::grnups. A-134 -5�90 `ARAFT FvF2 DlSCUSS10N PURPOSES ONLY The State legislature has stated that"the availability of housing is of vital• statewide importance, and the early attainment of decent housing and a suitable living environment for every California family is a priority of the highest order." In order to achieve this goal, local jurisdictions,should use all resources availableto them to "facilitate the improvement and development of housing to make adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community." As a. result, much of the an',�lysis contained din the Housing Element is concerned with identifying the ne is of,loo and 'uderate income households as well as other special needs groups, as these are the groups which typically have the most difficult time acquiring housing. A vaF#ety of pro9pasms ware eu'tl•#ned as a IF ;ns toward aeh4vtw§ Ws &$eet*ve and &r6-'d*seussed }n detaiY bel.owr r :± ACTION: This objective statement should be included in tihe revised element, but broadened to include the needs of all economic segments of the community, including special needs groups. In addition, Several ne-w/7rograys"have been added as a means of furthering the implementation of this objective and address the needs of mobile home parks and special needs populations as well as requiring implementation of programs developed as part of the Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing Strategy. PROGRAM 5.1 Administer and continue to develop Resiriential Mortgage Bond Programs whereby low interest loans can be issued to first time home buyers making at or belcm 120 percent of the established median incase level. - In 1983 administer a mortgage allocation of $36.2 Million. - In 1984 apply for ± mortgage allocation of $45.8 Million. A-135 FOR DISCUSSION PCIRPQSE S"014LY - In ,1985, and thereafter, apply for a mortgage allocation consistent with the developer and home buyer demand. The minimum antirtpated' target, as stated in the 1984 Housing Element, was to provide law interest loans for 280'low and moderate income households. The City has exceeded this goal. Since 1983, the Redevelopment Agency and the City have issued over $150 Million in Mortgage !evenue Bonds and approximately 760 homes have been financed. These programs were used more in the first few years after 1983 when interest rates were higher and housing prices were lower. In recent years,--'the price �t of new housing in Rancho Cucamonga has exceeded the allowable price limits of the programs-- These limits are deterained by HUD on a yearly basis which L include both income and sales price. However, should the housing development i industry modify their product type to meet these limits or express a need for this type of program, future issues could be slid. ACTION: The City shall continue to maintain and develop Residmt,:-4:( Mortgage Bond Program which will be utilized based upon demand and market conditions. This has been included as Program 5.A.3 in the revised housing element. PROSRM 5.2 i Through the development approval process, the City shall fI consider the use of Wtiple-Family Residential bonds I when requested, provided that 20 percent of the units are to be made available to households of law and moderate incomes. The City`s Residential Pond Program, which is implemented thraigh the County of San Bernardino, has assisted a total of 355 units since 1983, of which 271 units were financed in 1984 and 1985. This has exceeded the City's overall target of providing 151 units. As with the single family Mortgage R;Lovenue Bond program, the use of the program depends on prevailing market conditions and developer willingness to utilize the issues. f �,A--136 / E D F:,A-.F T FOR DISCUiSSION PURPOSES ONLY ACTION: As the residential bond program will continue to provide a viable source of financing for affordable rental housing, the City shall continue to promote this program, which has been included as Program 5:A.2. PROGRAM 5.3 Through the requirements of the Terra Vista and Victoria Community Plans, a Maximum 15 percent density bonus shall be provided for the development of low and coderate income housing in the following manner: for all units built under the bonus program, one-third shall be for families -2oking 100 .to 120-percent of the area median income, one-third of those making 80 to 100 percent of the median income, and one-third making 50 to 80 percent 4 j of the median income. Based on a study>-of the housing provided in Terra Vista since 1984, through May of 1990, a total of 1,519 units have been �4adle affordable to low and moderate income households, representing 52.7 percent of the constructed l housing. To date, the amount of affordable housing provided has exceeded the 'f anticipated goal of providing 15 percent affordable housing within this planned community. However, they have not met the goal of providing 113 of the units to each identified economic segment as the majority of the affordable.-units provided have been for those households whose incomes fall between the 80 and 100 percent of the median income 868 units (30.1 percent), 270 units (9.4 percent) and 381 units (13_2 percent) were provided to households at 50 to 80 percent of the median andto 100 to 120 percent of the median, respectively. L, While there has been periodic monitoring of Terra 'Vista, there has been no formal monitoring of the affordable housing provided in the Victoria Planned Community. Based on verbal information from the William Lyon Company and knowledge of past selling pr;ces, it is very likely that a fair proportion of the hones sold in the first years of the Victoria's development were A-137 DF�RAFT FOR DISGUSSl0N PURO' SES ONLY affordable. However, 'unlike terra Vista, the total number of units proposed for the Victoria PlannecgCommuni`ty has actually been reduced from the 7,577 as originally planned to 6,2.71 units.. Thin is a result of the fact that the Lyon " Compaq chose to develop a 'larger amount of lower uensity, single family prodVict had been developed than was originally planned. Therifore, in order to determine the exact number and distribution of affordable units provided in both Terra Vista and Vict2ria, it will be necessary to develop a monit9ring program which should be reviewed, on an annual basis. ACTION: It is recommended that the City, continue to implement the regotirements of the Terra Vista and .Victoria Commr!pity Plans regarding the number of affordable units to he provided. In addition, the City should require in annual review of the units provided'; to determine whether affordability ievels are being met. These actions ._rave been included as Prograw 5.A.3 in the revised element. PROGRAM 5.4 In conformance with SeAiton 65915 of ,ire California Government Code, the City shall provide development incentives to an individual project when 25 percent of the units are available to low and moderate income households or special needs groups. The conditions of the incentives will be prescribed through the use, of development agreements and are to, be specific to the project needs and characteristics. Such incentives may include: deferral, waiver, or reduction of fees, reduction of appropriate development standard, and density barus. i A-138 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES f ONLY- Provisions for the afiowance of a density bonus have in the past been used in AMEL conjunction with the �gnior Housing Overlay zone.; Since 1984, 3. senior apartment projects have 6e'en approved in which an increase in density was provided as an incentive for development. In .each case„ projects were . developed in the High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units--'per and had approved densities of ,34, 35.3 and 37.5 dwelling units per ac!e respectively. Typically, additional incentives were'also`al'towed and u,.ualiy involved reducing parking requi re rants, waiving fees, and direct subsidy. Recent amendments to State taw (AB 1259, 1969), have strengthened the requirements for provision'of incentives by cities to;develop61s of affordable housing. The revised legislation no. longer.alloys credit for pre: �sI of units for m:,derate income households, and requires t►iat incentives'4�:provded if: 20 percent of the units are reserved for lower income;, or ;f'10 percent of the units are reserved for very low intone; or if'Sepercent are reserved for senior citizens. The basic provisions of the law require that cities grant a 25 percent density bonus` over the otherwise maximum allowed density and at Least one other incentive; or, instead of th. density bonus, provide Aft other incentives of equivalent financla1_value. Additionally, the new legislation requires local jurisdictions to adopt an j implementing ordinanr- to '; the method of develooer incentives. As the City's current standards deal withthe,,,provision of J. ` density bonus in relation to senior, housing.`the development of an expanded density bonus ordinance has been added-to �he' Planning Division's 1990-91 work program. ACTION: `nclude a program for ;levelopoent of a density bonus ordinance which shall occur by the end of 1991 or within 90 days of a project submittal for use of density bonus provisions, whichever canes first. This action has 'leen included in Program 5.A.4 Lf ttte ,-tee sed element. A-139 F6R VISCUSslo"N PURPesE•:Ea Cr�L Encourage private dEvelopers to utilt, rental assistance programs to assist those groups in need as identified tik Vie Housing,Assistance Plan. 1..1 Rental assistance is provlt ed ;through the Federal Section o pTo;,Tams sh ah are administered through the County;Housing Authority. There are severa; 'pror''errs ' availablf including a certificate program, new cnnstruction and a scattered site voucher program. The total number of participants receiving zssistance exceeds the" p-:a:l amount of 145 partcipants (16 large families, 113 small families, anu 16 elderly fami','ies) ,stated `in tF ;84 Housing Element. As of January 31, 199r 'a total of 278 participants were being assisted of which 150 were participants in the certificate program. In addition to the certificate' program, there are 1%7 iiew cenrtiuction u>Ats contained in the Woodhaven apartment c6mplex and HUD owns 11 single family units in the City which are utilized as part of the!„ Scattered Site,Program. This program continues vo be utilized to its maximLm) potential and in fact as of January 31, 1990, the County dousing Authority i�rdicated that they had an aud'tional 271 applicants on the waiting list to receive Section 8 assistance. ACTION: The City shall continue to encrvrage. the use of Section 8 funding by private, developers s of rental projects arith informational',crocrdaents regarding the availability of the Section 8 prograa. MJECTIVE 6: Promote equal hc+ssing opportunities 1%r l economic S_`= ..�-cfi'rs of fine comunity. l t E a-14D r'i DRAFT FCR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The purpose of this objective is to provide information and affirmative support for the fair2 housing laws of the State and Federal governments in support of the goal of ensuring that all residents. have access to a decent h:,,me ,n a suitable living environment. The programs developed in furtherance` of this objective promote efforts to eliminate discrimination in the sale and rental of housing and to ensure that the rights of all parties are protected. ACTION: is this objective furthers the implewntation of the City's Eausing Goa'V by promoting housing opportunities foie all economic segments of the couunity it should be maintained. However, the objective statement should be expanded to indicate that ewAal housing opportunities should`' be provided regardless of age, sex, or religion.- PROPRiI 6.1 Provide financial support for Inland Wdi`tion Board, or a similar non-profit fair housing organization, Aicif assists in the resolution of tenant/landlord disputes and housing dincriminatiinn. To promote fair housing the City contracts with the Inland Mediation Board. _ - The L.nard is a non-profit organization which helps citizens (both tenants and landlords) resolve housing disputes without the need frr costly and time- consuming court action. The'Board also provides mortgags default rtiunseling, and assists with complaints regarding housing discrimination and refers cases to the District office of,the Department of Fair Employment and Housing, and conducts workshops to inform the community of tenant/landlord rights and responsibilities under State and Federal laws with respect to fair housing. From July of 1984 to June 1989, Inland Mediation Board has handled a total of 1,296 inquiries. Of information provided sinc(- July of 1987, 54 of those calling were further counseled 'and 15 complaints of discrimination were filed, 16 Tme last four years the number of cases have increased annually by an average of 17.8 percent. In addition to counseling, the Board also t= A-141 . DRAFT FOP DlSCUSSIOM PC iRPOSES ONLY provides public information services concerning fail- housing laws and available_ .rouaseling. "In fiscal year 1988-89, Inland Mediation Board held 8 public workshops, 7 radio and television appearances, and conducted 3 training sessions xith apartment managers. As the Ruwbep Of eases have }Rereased evep the 1•ast €9up years; It is likely that the number of 'cases will continue to increase over the next five years and as a result. support for this service should continue. ACTION: Continue 'to provide. support for,, counseling services provided by Inland f4ediatibn to assist in the resolution of tenant/landlord disputes and dousing discrimination cases.: This program is provided as 6.A.1 .`,. the revise-element. In addition to the counseling services described above, Inland Mediation`also conducts a senior shared housing program. This program offers counseling to senior citizens to identify and evaluate housing options and has been in effect for three years., ?tiring that period, from July of 1985 to June of 1989, a total of 77 seniors have been counseled and 4 persons assisted with a z match. The City plans to continue this program and will encourage Inland Mediation to further promote its availability. ACTION: Continue to support Inland Mediation in their efforts to provide counseling services to seniors regarding housing options. This has been added as Program 5.E.2 of the revised Housing Element. OBJECTIVE 7: Where possible, eliminate governmental constraints. Sate Law, Government Code Section 65583, requires 'that local jurisdictions provide an analysis of "...potential and actual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, impro.memtnt, or development of housing for all income levels...", and where 'possible remove those • constraints. The following programs were developed with the intent of limiting governmental constraints to the extent possible. A-142 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ON Y ACTION: It is important that the City,,continue to evaluate and reduce the Awk unnecessary governmental constraints on housing development. Therefore, iFis objective shall be continued and several new programs added to further implement this objective. These nrograms include the establishment of a revised fee structure,the provision of informational documents"to applicants, nd evaluation of the processing time necessary for affordable residentia:= ph )Jests. lk PROGRAM 7.1 Ikplement a 'computer fiscal analysis system which identifies the 'fiscal impact of new developments and which suggests financing alternatives�,;,;d methods for the identified costs. In 1983, the City of Rancho Cucamonga determined that it was necessary to prepare a financing plan that would evaluate the City's capability to provide public improvements and support future growth_over the next 20'years ,and to Aft determine possible financing alternatives. At the time the project began,'', high interest rates and a general slowdown in the U.S. econonr were limiting the ex",ent`to which development fees alone could finance the schools, roads, parks, and drainage systems that would be required to support .future growth. When the report was finished, in late 1985, economic-conditions had improved and the City had independently rude significant progress in financing public improvements. As a result, the large sc0 e, ,atywide fiscal model has been supplanted by more specific area stud,es. These various area studies cn the fiscal impacts of development have included i the development of several community plans, such as Terra Vista and Victoria, as well as the development of the Landscape and' Lighting Disricts and the Etiwandaj.San Sevaine Drainage Master Plan. A-143, . DRAFT FOR DiSCUSSjp pRpo _S $ 0 N L V In addition, the City provides a comprehensive listing of the various fees_ required for development including Building and Safety, Engineering and Planning fees. This information provides prospective applicants with the ability to_make an accurate assessment of the cost of developing at the earliest stage of a project and thereby determine its feasibility. The City is currently in the process of conducting,,a fee analysis to determine-qif the current changes adequately cover all City services and necessary infrastructure improvements. This study should be completed in Tate 1999 1991. ACTION:;, The City shall continue to implOwnt the various community, district, and master plans to help provide information to City agencies and private applicants regarding the fiscal impacts of development. Additionally, a program should be added regarding the development of a comprehensive fee analysis. A listing of these fees will then be provided to applicants in order that they may make an accurate assessment of the cost of developing. These actions have been included as Program B.A,.1 in the revised element. PROGRM 7.2 The Redevelopment Agency may assist in providing incentives for residential pro3ects, such as, payment of building and development fees, provide infrastructure improvements and land cost write downs. where 25 percent or more of jlhe units are available to low and moderate income househ:?lds. To date, the Redevelopment Agency has provided direct incentives to one affordable housing project, the Heritage Park Apartments for Seniors. The Agency contributed approximately $80,000 toward the cost of improvements. Fuch uses of the 20 percent set aside funds are no longer allowed. However, a number of new programs are being examined for use by the Agency in expanding the use of these funds. Unfier the terms of the Western Center Settlement Agreement, these funds may Fide used only for direct benefit to housing units R-144 DRAFT FOR ®1SCUSSION PURPL SES ONLY affordable to personstfamilies of low or moderate income. The Redevelopment Agency is anticipated to adopt a Housing Set Aside Fund Program Strategy during fiscal year 1990-9I, and implement specific projects with direct participation. This will provide for the release of approximately $'6 million initially and $4 million :annually, thereafter, for `low 'income 'housing projects., - c ACTION: In anticipation of;,completion of the Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing Strategv,, tnree programs have been added to the revised Housing Element. Program S.A..7 reluired the developmeent;and implementation of the Affordable Housing Strategy, Program 8.A.3 requires the evaluation of the City's project processing proceUres to determine whether shortened review times %ray be possible for afforda'aleLdevelopments. Finally, Program 9.A.1 has been added which requires tht ¢tausing Element to be revised to incorporate the programs developed as part of the Affordable Housing Strategy. Summary: Based on the above analysis, it has been determined that the existing 7 objectives: will be continued and that the existing programs will Ask either be continued, modified, or eliminated as discussed. New programs will be added as necessar,;, to further assist in obtaining the goals and objectives identified in Chapter 2. Additionally, as a result of the needs assessment evaluation in the 'technical Appendix, two new objective statements will be added which relate to ensuring high quality and well functioning environments and ensuring periodic review of the Housing Elements goals, objectives, policies, and programs. r' A-145 _(DRAFT FOR D[dC:UsSION PURPOSES ONLY GLOSSRRY Affordability - The number of very loH land larRr income honseholds occupying units at a cost 'greater than 30' percent of household income. Average Persons Per Household The total number of persons living in households ina locality divided by t)e total number of occupied units. Beautificatiin Fee A ,fee charged to developers S)r installation 'of landscaping and other aesthetic features by the City. Buildable Land - Ladd which is capable of supporting physical structures. Build-Out - The maximum amount of development possible within a given geographical area. Captu,°� Rate - The opportunity to h-jse locally generated employees within the City Limits, Constraints - factors which prevent or inhibit the development of'i,ousing in the City. ff Council of Governments - The organization createdpursuant to a jo',t,nt exe7cise of powers agreement to undertake planning and whose membership is composed solely of elected officials of local governments within the planning inrisdiction or their representatives and which is recognized as the area wide planning agency by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Developable Land - Land which is physically capable of being developed for ~_ residential, commarc or industrial use. Development Densities - The number of housing units per acre. DU'ss - Dwelling units. Elderly - Persons 62 years of age or'older. Fixed Market Casts - Development costs over which the City has no power or authority. Gross Acreage- The total number of acres of land which can be developed. Group Quarters - Persons in living arrangements other than households. Group quarters are located most frequeitly inAnstitutions, rooming houses, military barracks, college dormitories, fraternity and sorority houses, hospitals, >ronasteries and convents. Growth Potential - The availability of land for future urban development. i A-146 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION"PURPOSES ON Handicapped - Persons determined to haV6 a physical impairment or,mental disorder which i^,^expected to be of long-continued or indefinite duration and is of such a na\..re that the person's ability to live independently_4ruld be improved by more suitable housing conditions. Household - All persons occupying a single dwelling unit Housin3_ Unit (or Unit) - The placement of permanenz or customary and usual abode of a person, including a single-family dwelling, a single unit in a two-- fa-!ily dwelling, multi-family or multi-purpose dwelling, ;a unit of a condominium or cooperative housing project,_a non-housekeep-ng unit, a mobile home, or any other residential unit which either is. considered to be. real property :under State law or cannot be moved without substantial damage or unreasonable cost, Jobs-To-Housing Ratio - The proportion between the number of jobs and housing units in a particular-geogr5ohical "area. A ratio greater than 1 indicates , more jobs than housing units in an area, or the potential for overcrowding, long distance commut>ng, and a shortage of housing. `, Large Families,- A family of 5 or more persons. Lower-Income Household Household whose income, ,with -Jadjustments for household size, does not exceed 80 percent of the median household income of the standard metrtpolitan statistical area (SMSA), or outside SMSA's, the county, Marketability The attractiveness and saleability of a housing unit. Market-Rate Households - 7hose households who, as determined by the allocating entity, have the financial" capability``.o meet their housing needs veithout sacrificing other essential needs. Median Household Income - The amount which divides the distribution of annual iriousehold income into two equal groups.. For families and unrelated individuals, the median income is based on the distribution of the total number of families and unrelated individuals, including those with no income. Moderate-Income Household Household whose income, with adjustments for household size, is between 80 percent and 120 percent of the median household income of the SMSA, or outside SMSA's, the county. A-147 DRAW FOR DISCUSSION PLJRPC?SEi'' ONLY ' Needing Rehabilitation A housing_unit which, in its present state; materially endangers the health, safety or well being of its occupants in one or,.-more respects, and which is economically fssible to repair, Nt.oding Replacement - A dwelling unit which meets the above conditions, but is s not economically feasible to repair, Net Acreage - The actual number of jcres of buildael4 land, minus land for.,,,, roads, sidewalks, parks, scrtools, open space and utilities. Non-Market Rate Households - HousQholds who, as described by SCAG, do not have the financial capability to meet their housing need without sacrificing other essential needs, Off-Site Construction Costs -,Dev6Tcpment costs above actual site preparation and building costs, such as sidewa'W�, utilities, landscaping, etc. "'1 Overcrowding - A housing condition where there is 1.01 or more persons per room. Purchasing Power- The level of purchases which can be made by individuals and households, usually'defined as net (after tax) income. Regional Housing Market Area The geographical unit, established by the allocating entity (or the Southern California (,ernments), within which local interaction has resulted in social and economic interdeaendence in the areas of housing, employment and service opportunities. Regional Statistical Area (RSA) - The geographical unit used by the Sout�yirn California Association of Governments (SCAG) planning diva ion for Compiling U.S. Census and other statistical drip. SCAG Projections - The Southern California Association of 'Governments provides 1983 - 2000 growth projections for population, housing, employment and t"Ind use for the southern California region in i�;s-JSCAG 1983-Growth Forecast Policy/Development Guide, approved April 1903. These projections are used by local governments for planning purprses. Small_Families - A family of four or less persons. SMSA Acronym for Standard Metropolitan Statistical: Area. An area, which includes the Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside and the City of Ontario, which is used for data collection by governmental agencies for such things-as housing, population, employment, and income levels. 'I A-148 i DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Special Heeds -- Attention to the special needs of 1-.rge fbilies minority households, the elderly, the handicapped, homeless, and persons dispTacee ,as a result of;public activities, and others as t}e locality deems appropriate. Sphere=Of-Influence The geographical area wiihin w'i-ich the City has the ability to affect' 'Ryelopment or growth. } Suitability/Habitat ,ity - the number of households living in housirp needing " rehabilitation or replacement. Underutilized Land - Landj''�hich is not presently developed to thz;;fuilest and best use under thi General Plan designation. l Upper IL-'tome Household - Household whose income, wiwh adjustments for household size, exceeds 120 percent of the median househ-.l income of the SMSA, or outside SMSA°s, the county. `:'Very Low Income Household Household whose income, =with adjustment for hL ;fold size, does not exceed 50,percent of the median household income of. the SMSA, br outside SMSA's, the county. _ Weekly Absorption Rate The number of housing units of a particular type or price which is sold by reactors in one week. I A-149 -49 ' i RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPRCe+7AL OF vENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-03A, TO REVISE AND UPDATE THE HOUSING ELEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 10.6 OF; THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, ANTI ISSUANCE OF" A NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SU£PORT THEREOF. A. Renitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga h "i filed an application for Gen@ral Plan Amendment No 90-03A asr' described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendments referred to the "the application." (ii) On February 27, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho. Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the-?ipplication (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B R aolu .fon• NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined,- and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby speci4ical-�_y finds that all of the facts set fort.. in Recitals; Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. R 2. Based upon substantia:, evidence presented to th's Commission during the above-'referenced puhu.i,r--. hearing I February 27, 1991, in^luding written and oral reports, together with pudic testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The proposed revision and amendment �f the Housing Element will not have a significant impact cm the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study Par II; and (b) The proposed Housing Element Amendment is in substantial conformance with the previsions of Article 10.5 -.f the California Government :ode as evidenced by the revisions made to the document at the request of the State epartment of Housing ,ad Community Development; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GP HOUSING ELEMENT PrVISION 90-03A - CITY OF RANCH7\,CUCAMOWGA, February 27, 1991 Page 2. (c) The prop .ed Housing Element is consistent with the other>elementa' of the General Plan as provided through the organization and construction of the General Plan �> into super elements in which the goal, objectives, and " . policies contained in these elements are interrelated and dependant upon one another, and as a rest:lt of the recent technical update to the General Plan adopted w-.nuary 4, 1989; and (d) The proposed amendment furthers the attainment of the C,,ty's. overall housing goal through the development and implementation of the five-year action program and quantified objectives which" promote the preservations' maintenance, and development of housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community. 3. Based upon the 3ubstantial evidence presented to this Commission during thi above-referenced public hearing`, and upon the specific findings of facts 'set forth in; <. paragraphs i and 2 above, fs'is Commission hereby finds and i concludes as follows: - (a) That the proposed;Aous ng Element Amendment is in conformance'with the General plan. (b) That the proposed Housing Element Amendment will not have significant impacts on the environment. (c) That the proposed Hou4ing Element amendment is -n substantial compliance with the provisions of Article 10.6 of the California Government Code. 4. (a) The Planning Commission specifically finds and determines that a Negative Declaration for this project has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 19701 as amended and the guidelines promulgated thereunder; and furthex, this Commission finds ind determines that, Y sed upon the findings set forth in Sections 1, 2, and 3, that no significant adverse environmental effects will occur— (b) The Planning Commi;sion finds that the facts supporting the above-specified findings are contained in the Nagecive Declaration, the Staff report and exhibitz, and the information provided to this Commission during the public hearing; and therefore, this Commission hereby recommends approval of the Negative Declaration. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION=:NO. GP HOU&ING` ELEMENT REVISION 90-03A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 27, 1991 Page 3 S. Based upon the findings .and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 6.5850 to 65855 of the ' California Government Code, the Planning Commission of..-the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on this 27th day of February of 19S1, of General Plan Amendment No. 90-03A 6., The Se:ietary of this Corinission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution;` APPROVED 2.ND ADOPTED THIS' 27TH.DAr OF FEBRUARY 1991. FLANKING COMMISSION OF THE CITY C7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA i . BY: II Larry T. McN!el, Chairman ATTEST Bsad Bu ar, Setret.:ry I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plann-,ing Commission of the C�."y of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cc=rtify tt it the foregoing Resolution was duly and l ilarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commissf °' of the City of Rancho 'Cucamonga, at a regular` _,seting, Jf the Planning Commission held on the 27th dal. of FehVua~y 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERi: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT e' �,7 DATE: February 27, 1991 To. Chairman and Menber3 of the Planning Commission. FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Buckingham, Plann{Zaa Technician SUBJECT: ENVTRGN*WNTAL ASSESSMENT AND CCONL•iTYDNAL USE PERMIT_90-44 WEST COAST PERFORMZ% ARTS - .T}7 recraest to establibh a - dance and vocal training school in a leaved space of,5,988 i�quare feet ,?thin an existing commei;cla?. ,center on 30.5 :fires of la,,d in, the Specialty Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the.°Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 7965 Vineyard Avenue, F8-rl? -• APN: 208-101-10. Staff recommends iraLance of a Negative Declaration. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: , A. Action Aeauested: This applicant is regr-sting approval of a non-conmtruction Conditional Use Permit. _or a performing arts studio and issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Surroundina Land Use an Zoning: North - Vacant; Office Frofeselonal end Imw-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 7-outh - Vacant; Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Subarea 2% East - Gemco Center; Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Subarea 2) West - Roller Skating Rink; Community Commercial (Foothill I Boulevard Specific Plan Subarea 2) C. General Plan Deeianations: "roject Site - Comm: ..al („ Nort4 - Offics and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling yf. units per acre) South - Commercial i., East - Commercial F' West - Commercial 4` D. Site Characteristics. The project site is within the existing ,. Thomas :vinery Plaza which contains ton buildings consisting I w 100,103 square feet on 10.5 acres. r E. Parkins Calculations: (See attached Exhibit "G".) E ITEM C $k?.vn'TNG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-44 WEST COAST PERFORMING ARTS' y3bruary 27, 1991 Page 2 um i A. General: The applicant is proposing to loodte within a 5,988 sr;uare foot leased space occupying the entire second floor of f- a two-story building i\ the Thomac Winery 'Plaza (Sve`Bxhibit "C"i. Currently, the).first floor its vacant. The 'studio affeaa 3azs, ballet, nap dancing, drama, and voice clas:)es. In addition, there will be a small retail are&, specializing in trance supplies The applicant currently has an existing location in Ppland with'vatablished hours and clientele. The studio offers classes Nonday through liChursday from 3:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.n%. and Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to s12:30 p.m. •(gee Oxhibit "E"). The studio has recitals periodically but they are all ays held off-site. Spacial events, such as dances and fund raises, are occaaiona..�y hold on-site but usually after 7:00 p.m. on weekdays or weekends. B. Issue: The primary issues involved with this type of use in- a cconc3c i.31 district are parking, compatibility with surrounding uses, noise, and vibration. ;The following poragraphe address and diecuss these issues: 1. Availability of Parking: This issue concerns the availability of parking, loading and Unloading areas, and the additional impact of in traffic w_Jthin the ite. There W-,e currently a2 parking spaces in tide a�• center with 24 sp�tcee allbd.tpd.'ta,th-s r.nleased. space + (based on the nffice/.10-li)'' iormu?r. of 3.space per 250 quere feet). (See Exhibit "G".) If the przposed use is considered -e --'Health Studio and Spa" for the purpc:3e of parking demand, 39 parking spaces would be rewired (based on 5,161 Square fact of dance*floor at_1 apace par ISO square Zent, ,plus 827 square feet of-Office/retail at 1 space per 250 square Zeat). Thereford the. proposed use would be 34 apaces short. ' However,,.,there are 3ever91 factors that xeat•::e thee 'impact r thk potential parking �ciand. The atuZlz is predominantly• gesrod toward children �.udar in years of age. There are 27 alaaaes per wee but,only 5 include students over 16 years of age. Tnerefcr5s, most of the stud^ntn are dropped off and picked up. TMb .studio does not hold more than 2 classes smultars=,siy. Once there is a maximum of 12-i Aanta per .class, no more than 24 r_ students are enti-, gated cu-eit�, at any one time. Furthermore, though che_.jstuai(i'has o3 formal arrangements, - -_ it is not unusual tba`' . „� •� r;nles with friends or c"''Rr: family members---. Also, it is not unc that several stuc - icutive clarsea. .. PLAVNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-44 WEST COAST PERFORMING ARTS " February 27, 1991 Page 3 All of these factors combined may help reduce trip traffic and decrease the amount of parking utLlized within the neuter. Baeed an theile_considerations, it is staff's oainion that fir the purpose of perking ',4man4_ the, proposed una approximates morL- closely :c "Ccmme:.Ial school" which would-requ?re 1 space for each_:a*m__&I" plus 1 space for each fezalLy member _ in this case, 10`))spaces (base? on 24 students and 2 faculty members). If ,,his formula is_usedi along with an;,Appro,rriate limit on the number of students and facul+iy permitted under the Conditional Use Permit, the parking available rmypears more than adequate. In order to resolve the parking issue, the'Commiasiou will need to determine whether the proposed use more closely approximates a "rises?th Studio and Spa" or a "Commercial School in terms,ob '.R parking d.Anand 2. .Noise' gno. Vih1tin?Conflicts: Potential noise and vib:ation� conflicts cou16 aria_- from the use of sornd ystema and dancing The building is of standard construction and no special•provisions have been made for noise or vibration attenuation. Therefore, it is possible that noise and,or vibrations could gidversely impact surrounding uses,,. ,9spegiallp the-, future first floor tenants. Bowe.vo , 4f the Planning Commission considers approval, staff would condition the apllicant to comply ,with all pa;lormance f'and&rda for -,noise in commercial districts. In ,;dditiun, as with all Condit onal Use Permits, if the use causes adverse, acte upon adjacent bcjinesoes, the planning Corm_', could review the Conditional 136 Permit for possible revocation. S. Comnatib .11tw with SurrounrYa6 "ems There are a variety of businesses existing or~'oreni.xg .'soon within tho tnter includiig. restaurants. a farmers' market, .a pha_>'acy, clothing stores, and other' small- service-type businesses. In looking at the mix of uses with'- the 3ite,,,staff believes that the stulio could not. create any adverse impacts that would be incompatible With the . surrounding users, other than the ones discussed in the a preceding paragraph. C. options: Staff has attempted to explore var'ous conditions to >; allow the u':e. Staff has ccmpiled the follow,ng; list of mitigation measures and believes it is worthwhile for the S Planning commission to review and determine if .some'or all of the measures could reface the parking impacts,,of the proposed use. �w r -- -A-.�..a...�..m PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF nlFORT CUP 90-44 VIEST COAST PxRFORHI$rr'ARTS February 27, 1991 'age 4 i a, 1. All rocit.la�:could be held off-Bita. f - 2.. 2ne maximum number of Etpdents per class cf-uld be limited to 12. 3. Special events ,could only be held after 7.00 p.m. on weekdays or'on weekende'. 4. Thea maximum number of classes d%: any one time could be limited to two. S. Class sizes and times could be limitel durinV the shopping center peak hours of 5:00 to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays. J S. The total number of students on site at any one time could be limited, A. Tschninal Issues the Fire District had indicated tat the proposed use` woul4 be classified as ° a public assembly. Therefore, the applicant would be :required to submit plans prior to occupeacy for plan check to ensure compliance with all State Fire Marshal requirements (See Exhibit "F"). IIZ. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESG?_0RTs Upon review ht Part 3 4f the Initial Ask Study and dtipletion of Part L, of tY=# Environmental Cagcklist, staff has fgp4�d no significant impacts related. to a dance,.,studio locating within this'emmvsrciml center. IV. FACTS For, R1W ?JfGS: The Planning Commia4ion must make the fallowini• fird.ngs.before approving this aFp15'�ation: I lA.' That the proposed use is in accordance riith the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Cots',, old the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Su4rea 'in which the site is lccatedF- and B. That the proposed use will not, be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or mF.terially injurious to properties . LnpYp=.'sments in the vicititk.; and F C. That,the propured use complias with each ef tht applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. V. C2M_SPONDENCE: This item has beea advertised as a public hearing in the Inland '%aJley_Daily a le.1n newspaper, the,property ban been pasted, and notices were sent toadjacent property awn:~s within 300 feet of the project, �f PLANNING COHPISSION STAFF+,"'REPORT CDp'90-44 - WEST COAST PERFORMING ARTS February 27, 1991 Page 5 i Aft ., VI. CO NDATION, Tae ^(;-emission should take'gublic testimony and determine wHich parking formula should be utilized for the praposed tenant. If it is detetmined the use approximates a "Health Studio afd Spa," staff would recommend denial of the application 1 If it is f.:etermined that the parking demand more closely approximates a "Commescial'school," approval is recommended wi h appropriate candit ons to liwit the number of studentg ad faculty. Staff will prepare an appropriate Reaoluti©n based on - t a Commission's direction. IS_ Respect submitted, ;j /Cjt, Pl ner BB:BB:vp t} r; Attarhmentst Exhibit "A" Applicant's Letter Exhibit "U Te :: ,e+ Letter . Exhibit "c" Site Flan Exhibit."D - Floor Plan Exhi')it "E - Class Schedule Exhibit,"F"' - Fire District Comments l Exhibit,` "G" Parking Table:' . WEST COAST PERFORMING ARTS Dear Sir: West Coast Performing Arts is currently located at 580 E. Foothil Upland, CA. We currently"teach acting, modeling, dance and vocalitraining. :,We t also sell dance supplies. ' Our classes usually have between 6.and 10 studenta.. We have never had a -t:ing problem because most of our parents b%ing'the students and than a -e and return at the end of ti�a class. Ap%iroximately of our students are under the age of 16 and do not d ;ve. Our hours of omeration are between 3:30 pem. to 9:00 p.m. Monday thru Thursday. We are also open on Saturday from 10:30 a.m. to 12 p.m Closed on Friday. Class arrival and dips-rture time is,,staggore3 so there is no conjestion in the office or parking area. Parents arcs 6nly allowed to observe the classes on a ,tuarter3y bas�,�." � I T-py tot classes and ballet are done in the 'iarly classes, jazz in the evening-'houro and tap='during our late hours, so there is"noa;,Agise factor. \\ Tuesday class's have been arfan&d so that families with more then one child taking classes can bring their children;at the sLne time. Most of our Wednesday students take voice and dance, so they are at the studio for at least two hours. Thursday students stay for 3 to 4 hours,t;so th,-+re ie no traffic except for the few drama students that arrive in the 'evening. Thank you for your consideration: ' q I i ;f -n -57 i A Gam- F1Gyd L. rows r Jish x,hoa�tas Winery, Plaza 1839 Foothill & Vineyard • Rancho Cucamonga a:iz0 — C1T. r•!crMONGA January 4, 1991 JA.tN 2 3 1991 Pik Mr. Otto Kroutil 941419,11N12t ` Deputy City Planner A i City of Rancho Cucamonga P.C. Box 807 Rancho -ticamonga, CA 91729 Dear Mr. Kroutil: We, the Tenants of Thomas Win?ry Plaza, are excitec', about the possibility of West Coast Performing Arts becoming a part of out center. We,wvould like to strangly encourage your approval of their Conditional Use Permit. This use would be an asset to the center,to our businesses and to the overall community of Rancho Cucamonga. Thank you for considering our request. Sincerely, - a v�L f P s l Plaza rvine Farmers Market Gemmel Ph^, Stacy opA S plaa t 'on Thomas Wine Liquors Ki i�-e .Demo Photo 1 / � F er7Fram eft ' Ms. P's Quick isine Little Caesars ' While-U-Wait Shoe Repair Van Sousse t F- Corporate Off'.CeS I � J OAS Investors 2081 Business Center Drive o Suite 2w0. Irvine,CA •92715 • (714)833--11 r q� Leasing Office: (714)945.9712 I { 44 ,� s' i aaaae:aaai eia IN MID - r♦ i - Cii III'.iIML �� 71+1 �!;• ,✓ � �� -:,—.�9�_tl :,� � it ir..1•11111 I I I I I 9 li l r:r �� t —;—_— •I ���I�1 I I �i I it 1 � —� I I r -fl F t y' J r� •r lie FARM SVOWD FW, AO/ ID WA ..3 d:l r� Cj, 'i b a , I Sri - x.661' COAST PI kIWC)1 KING Ak1':; S.^.NY9ULk: '': } h1Uh'DAYt Itao;,�A A� S-r- 1.:3C do 5::00 2 students Pri ItaN:r, tt ,4 c.,F s 7 4:©0 to 5:30 5 students Jazz Roora A A44 ".1-1 5:00 to 6:00 8 atudenta B!tlett Room B A6aF 9-F1 '5:30 to 7:00 10 students" Jazz r Room A lire `1"1 6:00 to 7.00 6 students Tap 1 )6om B -AEe m-1-1 7:00 to 8:00 8 students jazz Room A 4,6 1S-14 7:00 to 8:30 5 students Jazz f Roovn B .44X I&1.16 8:00 to Q:c}cj 7 ttudents �Tkxz TUF-iDAY• Room A_ A , c.' R"ti-4:00 to 5:00 7 students Ballet Room B `Asw„ 7`1 4.00 tc 5g30 39 students Jazz Rooe A Ai« 12 :5:30 to 6.30 „i student private Room B A66 I3^ti' 5:30 to 7:00 7 students Ja4 Room 6 W =!2. .'; 30 to 8 30 l student Private. Room B /lad X—at 7:00 to 8:30 9 atudents` Jazz WrW SDAY: Room Aw AGE o-I 4:00 to 5:01 8 students MW Room B Abr 7--7 4:30 to 5:30 7 students Ballet Room A 46c' 5:00 to 6:00 1 6 students Room B Ave 7-1Q. 5:30 to 7=OO 8 students 1 Ballet Room A Ar:rr 7-S 6:06 t,, 7:00 i students Room.B .Are )3-)S ?:00 to 8:30 6 students �,az Thursday: Room A A6; 7-1c, 3:30 to 5:30 6 students Ja,Zz lap Room B ,A& 13 4:30 to 6:00 aohw7. Dance, Team`(Uplar Room A A&c 10-Its 5:30 to 6:30 7 sttagnte Modeling Room B gyk Ir13 6:00 to 8:30 S6zu)4`banoe Team (Uplar Room A <AGc 'azo;.7 6:30 to 8:30 9 st:Ys pnia Drama i Room B Ac-I Empty Frid ay: Closed Saturday: Roan A A;I, V-7 10:00 to 11:00 6 students Combo y_ o Room A f16r I1 11:00 to 1�.30 7 stsudenta Comb 64D e 1t PLAH ,:; ■ i i i i I January 14, 1591 j PLAN CHF,CK IMPORT WE,ST COAST PERFORM WG ARTS i THOIVIA.S WINERY PLAZA e 1. Large dance rssam is 2580 ;sgilare feet. TJAwl, a factor of 50 sq'dare feet per person, the occupant load is SZ persons, Ttis room is an A-3 public assembly. Special exiting requirements apply. Interior finish requirements apply. 2. Small dance room is 1896 square feet. t`�.r a factor of 50 Square feet per person, the occupant load , -37 persons. This room is a B-2, ordinary business occupancy. 3. Fire extinguishers required. ;Minimum size 2 1013C:. 4. Fire alarm .and fire sprinkler requirements as ,per Foothill Fire l District Ordinance 15. T 5. Permit re-quimd. to conduct a glace of public arg,mbly. There will be a fee for this permit. 6. Emergency lighting required. h„► Susan D. Wolfe. AN bxspector Sr WA& <• Parking Calculations: No.. of No. of;,,, it Type of Square RarKing Spaces Spaced Building Use Footage Ratio Required PraMed A Restaurant 7,628 1/100 90 1/55 (over 6,000 sq. ft.) B Retail 13,874 1/250 56 C Retail 3,975 1/250 16 0 Retail ) = 22,785. 1/250 91 Restaurant 5,381 1/100 54 f Retail ' 972 1/250 32 (1st floor) Dance Studio 5,161 1/150 I5 Office/Retail 827 1/250 3 f! (2nd floor) 6 Retail 8,710 1/250 35 H Retail' 2,902 1/250 12 I letail 9,909 1/260 40 K Restaurant '6,000 1/100 60 Retail 4,250 1/250 17 L Retail 729 1/250 3 100,103' 544 532 MIBI7 aG" - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWONGA4 f STAFF REPORT t; DATE; February 27, 1991 TO: Chairman and Hem,_�Drs of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Bullor, C3.1ty Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES ITIONAL USE Pe-.P.MIT If DES DEE''S DANCE STUDIO - The request to--;- tablish a `dance studio in a leaecd space of 2,700 square feet within an existing industrial park- 4 the General Industrial- District ; (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific. Plan, located at 9467 9th Street, Suits 5 APR: 209-032-2,A Staff recommends isuuance of a Negative Declaration.' L. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Action ReMS3te1, Approval of a-Conditional Use Permit for at dance studio aad the 3sauance of a" egative Decl?Xiltticn. ttt B. §R=ounding Land Use atid_90 n : North - Industrial L+uildinga; General Industrial District (Subarea 3) South - Vacant; General Industrial District (Subarea 3) East - Industrial'bujA dings; General Industrial District (Subarea 3) ?eat - Single family residence and citrus grave; GE al Industrial District (Subarea 5) C. zen4ral Plan''Desionations: Project Site -:,General Industrial North - General -industrial South General industrial East - General Industrial west - General Industrial D. Site Characterist3l°-ss The proposed use i-- loc%;ited wi-thin an existing fully-develope(l ,nulti-tenant industrial complex. The project site contains tdio buildings totaltn2 44 10 square feet and provides up to 20 tenant spaces and ,111 parking., paces. ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-02 DEE DEE'S' DANCE.STUDIO February 27, 1991 Page E. Parkino Calcti•latianss Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Re red Provided Dance Studio 1,700 1/150 3,': Office 1.00$ 1/2SO 2,700 16 II. ANUVIIS2 A. General: The proposed use entails 'this establishment of a 2,700 square foot dance atudic'Within the'Cuaamonga Industrial Dark, located at 9467 9th Street (see ,X*h1bit "C"). Proposed hours of operation are Monday through �ridrty from 10:00 a.M. to 7:00 p.m. and Saturday from 9:00 a.m \to 4:00 p.m Office hours will be maintsiund on weekday mornings while dance. classes will be offered in the afternoons between 3:30 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. However, on Saturdays, clar: 'as may be offered all dty. Two :.o three dance classes,are held; on any givon day. The dance studio will have two inat,'uctors and app„oximately ten students per seas cn. Parents are permitted to view their children at all times. B. esue;L The primary is:.ues related to locating this type of use within an industrial setting are compatibility with surrounding uses, availab$.iity of parking, and noise impacts. The following gar6grarna address and �;,;euas these Lasuen: 1. Compatibility of Uses; The propoued'. isee is located within m ,urrently vacant multi-tes, industrial park, Within &.'area 3 the General 7ndustiAal District uses typically include small scale manufacturers, auto repair, light warehouse and distribution facilities, and building contractors. Because of the type of uses permitted and tbv oval of noise and activity typically taeocia'usd with staff believes the dance stud la will not create adv,.ree impacts on potential tenants within the complex. Additionallyt Dan Deals �)aJnce Studio currently operates -0thir a similar multi-tenant induaLriul complex with *,,her usea including a church, restaurant.,- >hedical, f zrasarch/development facilities aaa a karatei school. If There have -been no compatibility pronlevss at their prig-..t location. 2. Avai3cbility of "irking; Thic ii4-�us contcrns the availa.}ility of parking and additional circulation demands the prcposed dance ati4 io may generate within project 'I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-02 DEE'DEE'S DANCE STUDIO February 27, 1991 Page 3 boundaries. A very donservat ,p approach would be to consider the proposed use a "Health Studio and Spa" for the purposes of parking demand. in that rase 16 parking spaces would be required (1 space for 150 feet of dance need plus 1 space for each 250 square feet of office). However, there are a number of factors to be coneidored which will reduce the potential parking demand. The proposed use is located within a 34,540 square foot multi-tenant 'industrial complex designed at a ratio of l parking space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area providing 111 parking spaces. As a total of 7 parking spaces was designated for this tenant space, there may be potenfi!ial parking conflicts between 3:30 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. when the dance studio proposes to begin classes while other businesses are still .'operating. Howevert approximately 85 percent of the students are dropped off and picked up by their parent, and some students also utilize car pool transportatic , Parking data published by the Urban >•«,P In3titute indicates that parking demand within the .t1pe of multi- tenant industrial complex peaks in the morn;;ng and begins to drop off significantly in the afterr-a.. Th_refore, circulation within project boundaries she+4l- bo minimally effected by such a use and parking capw,eity should be sufficient for the dance studio and all ;utuve tenants. However, to ereure availability of parking during normal business hours (i.e., 8:00 a.m. to 5:W p.m.), the Resolution of Approval limits dance floor square footage to a `maximum of 1,050 square feet, for classes conducted prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. This square footage requirement was determined by multiplying the number of parking spaces available to this tenant by,,-the established parking requirement ( 7 x 150 - 1,050). To satisfy this requirement, Dance Studio No. 2 (see Exhibit "D") should be utilized as its size is approximately 1,000 square feet. 3. Noise imp;icts; The applicant is proposing to use a home stereo system with two speakers. Building construction should,provide adequate sound attenuation. No significant noise impacts or conflicts are anticipated as a result of this project. The Resolution of Approval provides two conditions relating to noise attenuation (Conditions No. 2 and 5) C. Fire District Comments: :he Fire District conducted a plan check prior to submittal of the Conditional Use Permit application (see Exhibit "E"). Aasnd upon plans submitted to the District and the indicated size of the facility, the use will not be classified as a publir assembly; however, PLANRZNG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT , CUP 91"02 - DEE DEE'S DANCE STUDIO February 27, 2991 Page ®, Ask compliance with all uniform Fii,' Code Requirements will be required III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Part I of the Initial Study has be6it completed by the applicant. Staff completed Parts II of thee, ,, Environmenthl Checklist and found m9 significant impacts on the - enW,ronment as a result of ehis project. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Plannino commission must make the following findings before approving this applications_ A. That the proposed use is in accordance with the Gereral Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the ]industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is "located; and B. Tbat the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare,'"; or materially injurious to properties or improvemcnts in``the vicinity and; C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provigionB of the Industrial Specific Plan. V. CORRESPONbENCEr This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the In and Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have been 1.sent to all property owners within a 200 foot radius of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit 91-02, with conditions limiting hours of operation and size of classes, through adoption of the attached 1Aesoluf- on. Reap;P7 ly sub ted, C Brad er City P annar , BB:TG:Bp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Site Utilizat_yn Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan T.,xhibit "D" - Floor Plan Affik Exhibit "E" - Fire District Comments RAsolution of Approval i tanuary 21, 1991 City Planner Planning Department, City of Rancho Cucamonga - p.0, Box '807 Rancho Cucamon�,u, California 91730 RE: Cucamonga Industrial Center City Planner: I am asking for approval on a non-constructional Conditional Use Permit. I wish to„conduct a dance business at this address, 946� 9th Street, Rancho Cucamonga 91730. I am proposing to lease approximately 2700 square feet. The space could be d:.vided into two large classroom areas. The hours of operatiwi for ,Dee Dee's Dance Studio are as follows; Mon. thru Fri. 10:00 a.m- to 7:00 p.m. Sat. 9:00 a.a;. `.o 4:00 p.m. Sun. ClosedAML f It is important to note that the daytime students at Dee Dee's tend to be young in age and therefore do not utilize their own vehicles in order to at'--end classes. Approximately 85% of the students are dropped off and picked up by parents and/or' carpools. Dee Dee's does not need any additional parking over the parking spaces allocated to me in the parking code. I have chosen to locate in the Cucamonga Industrial Center for a"number of reasons. Primarily the location offers close proximity to the residential base of the city of Rancho Cucamonga. _ Secondly, the access afforded by .Archibald and 9th Street are also necessary to my business. Thank You. 3) Denean Friedman Dee Dee's Dance Studio j �• ..._. -NINT1� ^.. •_ '4REET� e' kk W4p z. 1 'I � CITY OF ] A CHCX'GUC-.MONC A P.Ar1NINj:' DIVISIOht �rrrL�: a fL1l12a ova ii 14 EXHIBIT: SCALE: .��� n-.w.•eta-�--��m-saaswa¢awea-,._"-__-.fs�P_'!PS --...___-_-mac.�z-- a3�_•s�xs•q'� �vaa� ��.-..o�.a q. NINTH STREET _.Fr...mar mwr.u`xwrl ��( r-. r'• J 0 t - r--� 00 . •. 4 C I arlanrfC �scd6 a O ILO0 r�r .�'� ------ ��,. i0Cnl a.©' ° Q aQo oQ - 'y • 100 , , at Q 0 Q I I i I - 1 aK ITEM:C,,- ITY OF RAKH , UCAMONGA TTTLE: GJt'� '�I►�Yt ` PLANNING DIVISION N lira r EXHIBIT: Cs' SCALE: "'�-' A � I � � w a 'Fir _F ,a �t All 0 rzo PLAN CHECK REPORT a met 1 33.33X .2c� �-�ota�•� � : s-o�`CIZ �-Z "A Rs Z p Ro F.Z- .c pahL� YOr 2. �� ca.� he etati—'./lu.�r�dl Csscce.�ry.. (�, ® V 4 PAA- ode, -cl s� . AML RESOLUTION NO. IMF A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-02 FOR, THE REQUEST, TO ESTABLISH A DANCE STUDIO IN A LEASED SPACE OF 2,700 SQUARE FEET WITHIN AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 9467 9TH STREET, SUITE 5, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-032-24, A. Recitals. (i) Denean Friedman has filed an applic?,:tion for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-02 as described in the title of this` Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 27th day of February 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted ? duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comnission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on r'?;bruary 27, 1991, includ'ng written and oral staff reports, together w�,th public testimony, this CommI ssion hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 9467 9th Street With a street frontage of 375 feet and lot depth of 300 feet and is presently improved,with two industrial buildings totaling 44,540 square feet and 111 parking spaces; and (b) The iyvoperty to the north and east of the subject site contains industrial buildings, the property to the south is vacant, and the property to the west contains a single family residence; and (c) The application contemplates two to three dance classes of ten students each, six days a week. Class hours are proposed from 3:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturday. -gib PLANNINC COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-02 - DEC DEE'S DANCE STUDIO February 27, 1991 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the spec'fic findings of farts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission �ereby finds and concludes as fol1ovis: (a) That the ,proposed use is in accord.with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (b). That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable there`), will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and ',( (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applica6,'b provisions of the Development Code., 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the rrniect has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Ent, 'nmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, ;this Commission hereby issues 'a,. ';egati1e Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusion; set Furth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approl,ei the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and incorporated herein by this reference. WV 1) Approval of this request shall not waive,compliance with all sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and all other City Ordinances. 2) If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adj .cent- businesses or operations, including, but not limited to noise, the Conditional, Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination tf the use. 3) Occupancy of the facility shall notcommence until such time as all Uniform Building Ceoe -and Uniform Fire 'Code regulations have been complied with;. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection, District and the Building and Safety Division- to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4) Any sign proposed for the facility shall be designed in' conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and any Uniform Sign Program for the complex, and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-02 - DEE DEE'S DANCE STUDIO February 27, 1991 . Page 3 j 5) The fac.'r}ity shall be operated 'n..conformance with the performance standaeds for Subarea '3, including, "but not limited to, noise levels. 6) Operating hours for classes shall be limited to Saturday and Sunday, and after 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except an national holidays. 7) This Conditional Use Per is approved for a maximum of one instructor and ten students p:.-� class, 8) Use of the dance studio 'prior to 5:00 p.m., Mond-f through Friday, shall be limited to a maximum of 1,050 square feet. 9) Special events such as award cd.-emonies, tournaments, or dance recitals, in which an audience may be present to view proceedings, shall be limited to weekends and after' 6:00 p.m. on weeknights. 6. The Secretary to thi, Commission shall certify,to the;ii -vti,on of this Resolution., APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1991' PLANNING COMMISSIC-m OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiei, Chairran ATTEST' Brad Buller, Secretary i, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of February 1991, by the following vote-to-wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I CITY OF RANCHO CUC4fflONGA STAFF RED 6*11T r� DATE: February 27, 1991 k TO: amirman and Members of the Planning Commission ` FFM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MULMIME FP21M DEVECAPMENT ASS Discussion of recent City' ozamcil direction regard rx the future development of multiple family residential projects. Staff will present scheduling and program proposals to irplement the C=--il's policy direction. I. tACKC=ROLTNI) AND DISCUSSIC K: Since early 2989, the City Council has expressed cc=ern over the anticipated h©vsing mix at the City's build- out. In the past far mouths, two workshops were conducted by the City Council to thomr0ily discuss the pros and Cons of the futum single family/multi-family housing ratio and the level of quality in housing developments. As a result, the City Council has declared its intention to formally consider limit;ng total housing units by reductions in the development of future nulti-family units and modifying current residential development and maintenance ttwdards to improve the quality of the Suture housing stock. Staff would like to take this opportunity to apprise the Cmmission of the Council's concerns and direction and to provide the background material an which the ammail deliberated the issues. Included An this packet are City Council staff 'reports outlining the by the City Cmusci l and staffs findings and conclusions in this regard. It is anticipated that the City Count- l will adopt a Resolution of Intent on i Tuesday, February 26, 1991, which will state the Council's dissection on these-matters. II. AM TON: With the general direction provided in th? anticipated City Council Resolution, staff would like to discuss setting a future Planning Ccami.ssion meeting at which staff will present suggested schedules and programs to accomplish the goals and objectives of the City oauu-cil. F 1 sins_ i Brad City anruet BB:AW/jfs {.• Attacitnents: W2 bit "A" - January 31, 1991 Workshop Packet Exhibit "B" -- February 20, 1991 City Council Staff . Report i ITEM E Second Workshop ,` l NOVICE O CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP I� ,l C(ly of Rancho Cucamonga A City Council workshop meeting to review future levMs of multi-family development(eg.,apartments, condominiums,and townhouses) hasbeen sched- uled for Thursday.January 31, 199. )The meeting will take place at7:00 PM inthaCityCouncil Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive. The purpose of the workshop is to review a City staff analysis of possiblebuttdout levels, of multi-family residential development in the City. Interested members of the public are invited to attend. After the initial City Council discussion,the public will be offered an opportunity to comment on the subject. Written comments submitted to the Community Development Dept.are also encouraged. A copy of the City Staff report Will be available to view at City Hall on January 28,1991. If you have any questions, please contact Alan Warren at(714)989-1861,Ext. 2254. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION ; r I 717 CrrY OF RANCHO �CLrA N�CINGA O .. CITY V►. U Z. E 1977 Adjourned Meeting January 31, 1991 7:00 p.m, i Council chambers 10500 civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California A. Call to order 1. Pledge of :Allegiance 2. Roll Call: Suquet , Alexander _,'Stout , Williams _, Wright B. Item of Discussion 1. Discussion of Multiple Family Development - The purpose of this meeting is to discuss multi-family development in general throughout the CL'.y. There will be no discussion regarding specific projects, f C. Communication frog the Public This is the time and place for tkte general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited,to five minutes per individual D. Ad'iournment I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of.the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy- of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 2S, 1991, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the nesting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. - I _i CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOPS Multi-Family Q,,evelopmerZt Second M9n QTksho,r TABLE OF CONTENTS Ca Part I - INTRODUCTION Part II - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Q Part III ACREAGE & UNIT COUNT APOUSTMENTS El Part IV - EXISTING MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT Cl Part VII - EFFECTS. ON SERVICES & ANTICIPATED REVENUES Q Part Vill - LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOPS Multi-Family De4upment Seca nd Works'hop 1 Part l INTRODUCTION Part 61 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY is z, i I DATE: nuary 31, 1991 I TO: ayor and Members of the City Council fR ; Frad Buller, City Planner B Alan Warren, Associate Planner i S BJECT SECOND MULTI-FAMILY DEVFLOPMENT WORKSHOP 'i PART I - INTRODUCTIOt1 RECOMMENDATION; It is recomminded that the City Council review the, supplemental information presented in this report together with the information provided at the first workshop and take public'tostimony on the matter. It is then requested that the Council provide staff with direction in regards to the formulation of alternative residential, Aft development policies. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: Since the last worksh( s `—taxf has been working to address questions and concerns voice. the Counci- regarding the information provided at thu first ,meetiY,j_ ahe results are contained with this report on blue colored paper in the same format s the previous workshop. The first workshop packet is i,,cluded an white paper. The issaes which have been addressed include the following: The Council requested that the City Services and Revenue vatrix (Exhibit II-I), Part IT, be reanalyzed in light of Iadaitio,tal study in specific areas as requested by the Counc0. An amended matrix is provided on page 5, Exhibit I'I-1b• I - A reeval!:aH' the :single family/multi-family unit ratios as a result of acreage adjustments is provided in Fart. III, page, 9 - 1/31/91-lig. 1 - A breakdown (by planning area) of the distribution of all existing residential units has besn provided in Part IV, pages 12 - 14 Exhibits IV-1 and -2,LL Exhibit IV-3, page 15, indicates distribution of existing ate' ,Lure units. - Assessment District revenue aejust.-nents are provided in Part VII„ pages 16 - 19, Exhibit VII--1 and;2. Traffic analysis of the unit adjustments from ;the initial acreage reduction, -cenarios is provided in Part VII,- pages 2n 21. The results of' 4 e _ '�sive school district survey is provided in Part VII, pages 22 - 36. Analysis of iaw.enforcement service calls in selected parts of the City is provided in Part VII, pages 37 - 43, Exhibits VII-2, 3, 4, 5, 6. T,;e results of dis ussions with Lewis Homes regarding the Terra Vista 3evelo�`-2nt agreement is provided in Part VIII, pages 44 - 46. NEW MULTI-FAMILY DEVEL07WNTS; At the first workshop, -CAe Council expressed a desire that staff monitor the progress of net multi-family development applications in an effort to determine if such submittals increase due to this Council study. Multi-family project applications submitted since January 1, 1990 are as follows: 1/31/91-Pg. 2 M Submittal Date Pro,tLct # ''j Units Acreage Location District Status a� January 24 TT 14795 14 1.23 Gen. City M inc. AML n!s Arrow, e/o Madrone March 15 GPA 90'01B 28-49 3.56 Gen. City Off.- Med. PC GDA 90-02 (36) '' 3.55 Gen. City DP fit appr'd Cturch Archibald September 17 TT 15138 10 .7 Gen. City M inc. Arrow & Baker Septembar 18 rT 15139 it .99 Gen. City K inc. nIs Arrow, e/o Baker inc. - incomplete application These application numbers do not ndicite an increa'•e ias the rate of multi-family development over previous years PART II - SUNKARY From the information provided in this study and staff analysis, certain conclusions present themselves for zonsideration in the formation of residential lard use policies. Stztif believes the following statements provide a comprehensive summary of the issues discusseu in this upda-od repor t: 1. The ability to attain a 75 percent.SFR/25 percent/MFR ratio at build-out is ;significantly affected by the existing Terra Vista Development Agreement. This Agreement does not give the City the option to amend land use density policies in that planned community without the Agreement of both Lewis Humes and the City. 2. Lewis Homes is not now interested in amending the Terra Vista Development Agreement to adjust residential land use densities. Refer to the letter from 'Lewis Homes in Part VIII, pages 45 - 46. 1/31/91-Fg. 3 Z Aft 3. That existing rates of law enfnrcement call for service do n!t indicate any significant-,.difference between single family and multi-family residential `developments. Therefore, only with reduction in total residential units could one 'expect reduction in calls for service. 4. That no significant change in City wide traf7ic volumes can be expected by the anticipated adjustments in unit co:ints as a result of the initial acreage adjustments (75 percent to 25 percent, 70 percent to 30 percent) presented at the first workshop. 5. That unit redo( ions based on the initial scenario, presented at the first workshop coulu<reduce anticipated revenues to the assessment district from 20.0 percent to 25.3 percent City wide. As a result, in order to,mainiain the same level of districts' service, increased residential assessments would be needed. r ACTION: Provide staff with direction as to how the Council believes this project should proceed. A draft"Resolution of Intent which lists some of the concerns and potential alternative and use policies voiced previously by Council members is provided for"the City Council's consideration. If the Resolution meets with the Council's desired policies, it should be formally adopted with any Council amendments, at a regularly scheduled meeting. ' -P 31 9T a. 4 INIS TU `Z to 3 U) — cc w (1:W o E n w _ w v W cn— 4 r: � c�� _ •5 U w� a zw CL o o cn I= E o n F CJ c +W w p' Ww o W cc — x LLI ran Lf) - — z S 777 L?'H•^ Z J Icc u o. Y O a+s Q s o m'. J Q U LJ -j U' Z S,�- M LL V-w J W: F- Cn is i CO m z W W Q-i m o >- - .. m o {- < o m W. V m -o > U w ~W wJ m o 0 jl' EL W J C C L. OF-3 m C I r> — Q to m w cf, C9— FIR — z J L J; S O o 0 O Z CL W z • Z CJ rn S msio c Qz -,w U w o, r, o LL z 2 cn i o v� o v� N M m ® a o � LO 1/31/91;-Fg. 5 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO INITIATE GENERAL PLAN, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SPECIFIC PLAN A4D COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS CITY-fA DE TO REDUCE THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF MULTIPLE FAMILY DESIGN.�TED VACANT LAND 14ITHIN THE COMMUNITY. A. Recitals, '1 (i) The Rancho Cucamonga City,Council requested in 1989 that the City staff begin to research and report periodicalry to this Council on the status of residential developmerii', within the Community. (1i) At regularly scheduled meetings of May 17, 1989, August 2, 1989, June 20, 1990 and special public workshops on August 9, 1990 and January 31, 1991, the City Council reviewed City staff's analysis of the potential future residential development based on current vacant uncommitted residential acreages and allowable unit densities and received "public testimony on the matter. B. Resolution. NOW, ,THER'cFOP E, it is heveby found, aetGr mi�ned and resolved by the City Council of th'a City of Rancho Cucamonpa as follc,"s; 1. This Council specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part HA", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial information presente, to this Council at the above-referenced public meetings,;- including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: 1/31/91--Pg. 6 I / VAftk _ (a)- That the community's citizens have voiced concerns over the increasing numbers of multiple family unit development and decreasing numbers of single family unit development which is gradually changing the community's residential character and resulting in significant increases in vehicle traffic volumes, increased demands on City services, and overcrowding in local-,schools. (b) That the future level of multiple family unit development can be expected to increase significantly based upon the amount of available vacant uncommitted multiple family land in the City. (c) That such increased development of residential units can only intensity the problems associated with the items of concerv:' listed in paragraph B.2(a) of this Resolution. (d) That a decrease in the';residential units anticipated at Alk IM build-out in the community will help ta -ressnn the negative effects of those items listed in paragraph 8.2(a) of this Resolution. ' (e) That decreasing''the amount of vacant uncommitted multiple family, land bZ.changing its use designation to single family land will result in fewer taial'Wnticipated. units. (f) That decreasing the total build-out rW dential unit count will not necessarily' hinder the City's housing programs;'which do allocate i funds for development and improvement of new and existing"dousing stock. (g) That some existing residential land may be better suited E for non-residential purposes based upon existing General Plan policies and I generally accepted land use principals. III 3, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Council during the public meeting and upon facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council finds and concludes as follows 1/31/91-Pg. 7 (a) That this Council determines that 'a-,reauction in the anticipated total 'housing unit count will lessen the negative effects from residential grown in the Community. (b) That multiple family land provi des,;a significantly larger amount ofresidential units per acre than single family land. (c) That a reduction in vacant multiple family acreage would provide the most effectiive method to reduce the total residential unit count at build-out. ii (d) That t4 Council directs, staff to begin the process to reduce the community's amount of vacant multiple family land through the City's formal amendment process for the 'General Plan, Development District Map, Victoria Planned Community, Etiwanda Specific Plan, and Foothil_'( Specific 1^ Plan to ensure, at the City's build-out, a 2S:-; "' percent multi�p�e family unit ratio when compared with all other housing,(unit types. is this Council's preference that multi-family development' be limited to;a goal of 25 percent of the total units at build-out. As a goal, the Council recognizes that rezoning decisions based upon"generally accepted land planning principals may result in a percentage slightly higher than 25 percent. (e) That in the amendment process, staff will ,investigate all vacant uncommitted multiple family land for potential land use change to Tess' f, dense multiple family designations, single family designations, and other non-residential designa-01.ons which may be appropriate on a site by site basis. 4. The City Clerk --hall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 13 1/31/91 Pg, 8 C11TY COUNCIL WORKSH'OPS Multi-Family Development Second Workshop 1 Part III ACREAGE & UNIT COUNT ' ADJUSTMENTS r� PART iIi Act SAGE 5 UNIT COUNT ADIUSTMEKTS SECOflC':MRKSHOP At the first workshop, the City Attorney's office advised that unit reductions below the amount approved in the Terra Vis h Development Agreemer* could not be instituted without approval of Lewis Homes. The response from Lewis Homes (see Part VIII, letter fromc,losep'h+M. Oleson) to staff inquiry about potential adjustments to the approved unit total for Terra Vista suggests that the City should n.ot, at this time, consider unit reducti ans i n tntl-5 pl ann2d community. As a result, staff has restudied the various unit reduction scenarios as presented at the first workshop. The effects of dele;A ng the previously considered unit reductions from the Terra Vista Planned Community are as follows- - The 75 percent/25 percent Scenario with Sphere Estimates 72 percent SFR (69 percent I) 28 percent MFR (31 percel( JI) — The 70 percent/30 percent Scenario with Sphere Estimates = 68 percent SFR (65 percent 1) 32 percent MFR (35 percent i) The Revised 75 percent/25 percent Scenario (Sphere Estimates not considered) 70 percent SFR 1Without including Sphere Estimates kip 1�'--/ 1/31/91—Pg. 9 30 percent 11FR f � 1 The_Rey,�sed 70 percent730 percent Scenario (Sphere Estimates not(co;nsidered) 67 percent SFR 33 percent MFR All the acreage considered for amendment for unit reduction is that land which is vacant without any applicatiop currently under City review. If all the vacant/uncommitted multi-family land outside of Terra Vista was changed to Low-Medium.-single_ family, the ratio at build-out would be 70.8 percent SFRI29.2 percent MR. Ask DENSITY BONUS: Also, at the first workshop, the Council requested information on how density bonuses` would affect the anticipated unit _ ratios. Staff applied the current State mandated 25 percent bonus and the 50 percent City-bonus proposed in the Draft Affordable Housing Strategy. The build out projections (with='a base 62.5 percent development within each density range) are as',�follows: Under the current General Plan provisions: - The 25 percent State Density Bonus could result in multi4amily unit percentages between 43.3 p_rcent2 to 44.8 percent3. The 50 percent Affordable Housing Bonus could result in a multi-family unit percentages between 45.6 percent2 to 47.3 percent3. AWL 1/31/91 Pq. 10 AML Under the Revised 75 percent/25 percent Scenario: (& excluding any Terra Vista down zoning) The 25 percent State Density Bonus could result in multi-family unit percentages between 31.9 percent2 to 30.6 percent3. The 50 percent Affordable Housing Bonus could result in a multi-family unit percentages between 32.9 percent2 to 30.9 percent 3. Under the Rovised 70 percent/30 percent Scenario: (& excluding any Terra Vista down zoning) The 25 percent State Density Bonus could result in multi-family knit percentages between 36.2 percent2 to 33.6 percent3, The 50 peKu:- , Affordable Housing Bonus could result in a multi-family unit percentages between 36.7 percent2 to 33.6 percent3. 211epresents density bonuses on 100 percent of the vacant multi-family 'land. 311epresents density bonuses ;on 25 percent of the vacant multi-family land. - ' 4 V3179 Pg. 11 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOPS Multi-Family Development Second Workshop NA lid EXISTING' MULTI-FAMILY 1t DEVELOPMENT PART IV - EXISTING MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT SECOND WORKSHOP At the first workshop, the Council requested a breaLOWn of the existing housing units by plannv;;;area. Since the beginning of the process to monitor future multi-family development staff only concerned itself with detailing the distribution of future housing units, not the distribution of existing units. As a result; this request by Council necessitated a complete reorganization of the existing unit tabulation. Previously, staff simply used the State's 1990 City wide estimates for housing units as a starting point on which to add the units anticipated from each planning area's vacant residential land. Since the -State estimate does not provide any geogiraphic distribution within the City of tl�e - units, staff was forced to use another starting point and AIL information source to determine the units counts within each plannim� area. ince the federal Cans-is preliminary figures had just been provided, staff determined it would be best to use these figures, in conjunction with official City challenges to the Census Bureau, to determine existing unit counts by planning area. The revised)existing' unit counts and build-out projection (per existing General Plan designations) are shown on Exhibit IV-1 and -2. Based on this method of tabuiatie^, the current housing ratio is 74 percent Singly Family, 26 pe cent Multi-Family. The -inticipated build-out unit ratio is 60 per4.3Mt SFR/40 percent MFR based on the current General Plan land use designations. In summary, the existing and build-out residential un` s are distributed as indicated on Exhibit IV-3. _ 1/31/91:P,. 12 c, i O � .- � �y,. a•1 l� � z w cd in sus ire l a y O q O Ili A j7 fl�F ffi 2e l0 chi ��11 O I 93 d= sm � a E E " E E o 'st t1 A Ira - � � a 41CL O "- _ 1/'31/91-Pq. 13 PRESENT/FUTURE HOUSWG DISTRIBUTION* Cty of, Pancho Cucamonga Units (thousa aj 40 35 . ..._.................. .._._............... 30 25 ...... 20 ...._.... _.. ..._......... - 15 22,636 �.... w._._.4.r M_.: »..: M . .... :; ....... . 10 :. . . _._... 328 ;339 present 582 981 3,048 future 3 323 413 1,026 g3Pk 1,848 1,344 General City Etlwanda - Terra Vista Victoria Planning Areas HOUSING TYPES SFR-present SFR-future C MFR-present CQ MFR-suture Per existing General Plan as of E/90 ITEM:2nd Multi-Family Dcveloprnent Workshop 41"y OF RANCHO CUCAMONG,'rA TITLE:Housing Diaribudon Chan " A EXHIBIT: V-2-SC ALE: CALE: 1j31J91-Pg. 14 u Ecisting Housing Unit Distribution General City--Single Family 91% YIota a-Single Family,79S ?: arra Vista-Multi-Family,A% arra Vista-Single Famliy,'3% Genera!Gty-Multi-FpmliV.22 Etiwanda-MWtI-Fam14y,1S5 Etiwanda-Single Family,2% BUILD OUT HOLDING UNIT DISTRIBUTION General city-Single Famil a3% S(tQt Ic-Multi-Fatnliy,7% Generalcaty-MultlF t1y,1844 Victoria-Single Family,7%, Ethvanda-Single Family,7% Terra"eta-Multi-Family,10% Etiwanda Multi-Famlly,e% Terra Yletn-Single Family,2% ITEM•2nd.Multi-Fam:i y Development Workshop CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:Exi=_tir.K&Buidlout Unit M ribution li } EXHIBIT: IV-3 SCALE: 1/31/91—Qq. 15 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Multi-Family Development Second Workshop Part VII , EFFECT'S ON SERVICES ANTICIPATED REVENUES E r PART VII. EFFECTS OR SERVICES AND AWICIPATED REVENUES SECOND WORKSHOP .1_ Assessment Districts: The analysis of effects on assessment dil tz fcts revenue from reduction in total units is shown on the attached memo and chart from Jerry Fulwood,Deputy`City,Ptanager. The 1o5s of anticipated revenue at build-out based upon todays assumptions ranges from over $1 million City wide in the 75 percent/21,% percent scenario to around $900,000 in the 70 percent/30_percent scenario. The area most significantly affected in total dollars is Etiwanda with a worst caF.e loss of $800,000 and the least affected would be the General City area with a loss of over $30,000 in the 75 :rcent/25 percent scenario. The total figures included 'unit red,rXtion for Terra Vista. Since it does not appear that unit reductions are, possible, at this ` time, for Terra Vista, greater unit reductions will need to come from the other planning areas in order to attain-the desired unit ratio at buildr,out. Therefore, '_'*,,As logical to assume the loss of revenue in the General City, Etiwanda and Victoria will increase proportionally with the amount of added units deleted from each area. Planning staff, using thL' figures in Exhibit VII-1, ejstimate that in order to keep the same anticipated revenues the assessments in each district would need to be increased as shown in Exkibit VII-2. ,t r, �' - 1/31/31-Pg. 16 CITY OF RANCH(?,CUCAMONGA MEM0a ` U 1 li �l u 'DATE: November 26, 1990 (r TO: Larry Henderson, principal Planner FROM; JErry B. Fulwood Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: BULTE-PAKILY UNIT REDUCTION IMPACT ON ASSESSFAF T DISTRICTS The 75/25 perasnt build-out ratio compared to current anticipated units, is projected to i�--,Iuce assessment district revenue between $1,144,515.13 and $1,254,476.82. The 70/30 percent ratio Will reduce anticipated revenue between $879,843.87 and $964,480.21. The 70/30 percent ratio provides less of a Sass of revenue than the 75/25 percent ratio. Regardless of the percentage ratio selected between single and multi-family, the more,1,apen space requiring maintenance with fewer dollars collected on a gross unit total }oasis, necessitates an increased assessment. JBF/tlr JBF9637 Attachment On J 1/31r91-Pg. 17 n^v a$ &m o • s �� 88�8,-,3A 88 F8 � v 3 m wmg NN a— _ N Q 65 sin 'a C �ltl Ig sgp u5" u •"a 88 S8 88 . �31 . , s �s as g8 . 88 , BSA 99 ir IL a cis, °Jia a"S9 otiS7 �S°� U) � z 1(31/91-Fg. 18 U Ir POTENMAL NEW ASSESSMENTS 1REULI G FROM UNIT RF �Qjy,S: Assessment Dist, New Assessments $ J greased Amt$ ° ncrease L2 General City 4, f , 75%/25% Scenario 76.91 - 79.95 22.72\. ' A25.76 —7:9 - 47.5 700/c/30% Scenario 68.41 - 69.92 14.22 - 15.73 26.2 - 29.0 ii L1 Etiwanda 75%°/25%a Scenario 773.58-791.80 168.08-186.30 27.8 - 30.8 700/o/30%° Scenario 748.40-766.21 142.90-160.71 ? -a. - 26.5 Werra Vista 75%/25% Scenario 195.96-198.80 65.8$, 68.70 50.6 - 52.8 75%/25% Scenario ° 14b.47-144.26 13.37 - 14.16 '10.3 - 10.9 Victoria 75%°125% Scenario 375.80-384.74 141.80-150.74 60.6 - 64.4 70%°/30%6 Scenario 312.00 78.00 33.3 i T ITgM•2nd Multi-Family Development Workshop CIT Y OF RANCHO CL CAMONGA TITLE:New Assessments Chan N I r EXHIBIT:V11-7-SCALE: 1/31/91-Pqe 19 PART VII p EFFECTS CK SERVICES AND ANTICIPATED REVENUES SECOND WORKSHOP Engineering: Since the first workshop, the Encgineering staff has run y computer models for the Clzy-wide effects of the initial unit reduction w scenarios. The results are summarised in the fallowing mento of January 22, 1991, from Paul,RqugeFzu. TraMe Esgtineer. In effect, theca does not appear to be a significant reduction in the total traffic volumes (City-wide) as a result of decreasing the multi-family units. This is a result of anticipated; greater tips per day for single family units which under the various scenarios are increased in number as the multi-family units are decreased. ,1 J, ,I (` I �y,::?P 1j31/�1—Pg 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN1ONGA 4 71� MEMORANDUM DAZE: January 22, 1991 TO: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner FROM: Paul Rougeau,%Traffic Engineer IrK t" BY: Alex S. Vicencio, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Impact of Multiple Family Unit Reduction on traffic volumes ii Comparing the result of the',Post4010 '70-3Q1 and 75-25 Multiple Family Revision Model Runs and the current Post-2010 Rancho Cucamonga. Traffic Model (R.C.T.M.) Land Use and Trip Generation Summary, at build-out the changes are very minimal anddon't have any impact on traffic volumes - An analysis of the data shows that the relative changes i8 single family and multipI r'family units is equivalent. to„the differences in traffic generated 'may the different housing types. Single family housing k generates 13 trips per day 'per house in Rancho Cucamonga and multi-family housing generates an average of six trips per day. The effect of this was to "cancel out" the changes from a traffic standpoint. P PAR:ASV:sd cc: Alan Warren Barrye Hanson Alex Vicencio 1 I l i 1/31/91—Pg. 21 t r,l PART VII - EFcECTS ON SERVICES AND ANTICIPATED REVENUES SECOND WORRSH&P SCHOOLS: In September, 1990, City staff sent a survey (refer to attached School response), to all the schc9l districts within the City boundaries regarding the potential redL-,tion in multi-famil,s units. Only Alta Loma School District did not provide a written rssponse. Briefly, we find that the districts have indicated the fc.11owing views/analysis regarding the reduction in multi-family units 'and the affects on school services 1. The three responding elementary districts do not differentiate between housing types when formulating student generation factors. Therefore, only a reduction in total units will affect the anticipated elementary student -,. population. Variations in the single family versus multi-fain .,nits will not affect anticipated student population as long as the total unit count remains:the same. 2. The school districts' potential unrealized revenue because of student reductions ranged from a low of $.1.6 - $,18 million (Cucamonga) to a higi of $6.7 million (Etiwanda) .`or the 75 percent/25 percent unit scenario and a low S�,f $.13 - $.16 million (Cucamonga) to a high of $4.85 million (Etiwanda) for the 70 percent/30 percent unit scenario. The total unrealized revenue from the four responding districts was between $8,030,877 and $8,079,958 for the 75 percent/25 percent unit ratio and between $5,668,130 and $S,720,938 for the 70 percent/30 percent unit ratio. 3. Two districts (Central and Cucamonga) indicated that the quality of instruction can be affected by the degree of ` student transiency which tends to lower with single 'familyArk home cocmunities. MW F 1,f 3 IV91-Pg. 22 r 4. Central School 'istrict indicated that it supports the , 75 percent/25 percent unit reduction scenario. Cucamonga School District indicated that large numbers of multi-family units within the district impacts its ability to provide quality education due to a high transiency rate, Refer to the following school distrits response for further information. l 1/31/91-Pg. 23 f C Chaffer Joint Union High Scr'ool (DrsLrict 211 WEST FIFTH STREET,QNTARIO..CpUFORNIA 917821898 • (714)981i`iSt i y gPFAINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS ASSOCIATE SUPENNTENDENT BOARD MCFAMS Dean E.Smothers INSTRUCTWN KFMNen&Kn4y ls CsttA 8.NamsOn &Y C.mum etssu t AUWANT 5UPEMNTIVOW RChbles JJ.Semo Cs�risa . ,Waw0 C+ersm.W. M S P 24 p September 20, 1990 ilt21�141J1'' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ATTN: Cindy Norris RE: Multi-family Unit Study Attached is our response to your study questionnaire.. Tf' you have any questions or need more information, please, c$11. Sincerelye Aw STEPHEN L. BUTTERS Director Business Services f SLB/s0 Attch. L j 1/31/91—Pg. 24 (.. .nwti f:. ALTA LOMA:.CNAFM ADULT EDUCAMN•CHAFM•E'MAW'A:•l ONTC[AgM.ONTA"•VAL E•.t. MULTI-FAPILY QUESTIOMMAIRE Aft The following questions are designed to provide necessary input to the City and assist in maxing,:a decision with regarfi., to the multi-family unit study. I. For each of the three scenarios discussed in the attached letter please inditite chat your anticipated build-out student generation figures will be. <.? Current: Scenario 1. _1193 to 1443 Uv2rAg2 - 131a1 (tdaxieat■ of 91 Scenario (2)__jU4_xa 143A CAyer=2 = 13261 students different*.) 2. Based upon the Dietr=ict's Master Plan or other related studies, please indicate the student generation factors (SGF) that ari--jused for the_rarious land else types Multi-Family (general) 14 Apartments o4 �.. male Family (general) .18 Attached - Detached and Condominium 14 Fl�easer;ndlcate any other G� Gs-that be used in unusual or special circumstan,:es based upon unit type. 3. Based upon the District's MasVir" PI-R\ indicate what ratio of pupils/school site is used-'. 'pour District. I Is this ratio consistent with State ouidelfn!15 or does the District t use its own ratio guidelines-7--_reM_ No x Explain state ■axes it =o. ,s'usas 2500. If the State guidelines are not use please indicate the reison. Econa■iea do rot alloy smoller ezimis. Smaller r,00ls vnuld drive the capital ' coat per student up. `L 4. Will s change in thm multi-family unit mix as diseusaed_ in each of the g, as land use scenarios affect this pupil/school site ration for your district itr each of the these tend use scenarios? Current: Yes®®, No xx Anticipated Ratio Scenario (1): vms� Nt1__X__ Anticioatod Ratio ' Scenario M: US- Ma X Anticipated Ratio Are the changes considered to be A significant impact by the District? 1/ / 4 3� 91-P . 25 AE�__ 5 5. Ghat imp"i w 0 the proposed change in multi-family unit •mix proposed /n the three wscenarios have on your Capital Facilities Has`.ter Plan? For example, wi11 a reduction in uivits cause an impact in the anticipated construction of row classroom facilities or acquisition of schogl sites or aft Xi t the acquisition of new equipment or on-site improvements? at !lam�ianitieeai ioOnr�_Masrix ehnneo of 99 a nt r,t- �,.� 6. 4li11 a change iar the -anticipated number of units and students proposed in the three 'scenarios affect the District's impaction status with the State with regards to funding 1br additions' school facilities? f Not t aip,sticantlr, 7. E'Aat impact will the proposed change in the anticipated number of units and students for each scenario rnve on the District's revenue generation? About 3310,000 reduction, t�T Please indicate the anticipated revenue'generation fr each scenario listed below. Current, Scenario f2) ,sca.000 Will this change in revenue be considered a significant Impact by the District? ss,o x310,0 ,asnieue nti9uetio0 in revenue��d b►offset by about le, 00.000 reduction in coots. Y16Q 000 !i sienificent but not ov4rti such. 8. Are there any other factors that you feel will be significantly effected.as a result of any an* 0 the three proposed land use scenarios? uo 9. Will ;-,y one or the three land use scenarios have a significant imp&'Ct on the District's ability to provide quality educational services? rim AMh 1/31/91—Pg. 25 t d OCT 9 1990 MLLTi-FAMILY quESTIOMAERE The following questions are designed t5 Pravida necessary input to the :ity and assist in miking a decision with ragkrd to the multifamily unit study. I. For tech alf the three scenarios discussed in the attxhad letter please indicate what your anticipated build-out student generation figures will be. Current- Soo UNISIT •k° Scenario Scenario (2j , 2 Based upon the District's Roster Plpn or other reletad- studies, please indicate the stajurt generation factors (SQF) that are used far the various land usatyges: Multi-Family (general) _._1 Apartments Family (genera"?'_, Attached Detac?ied 9 ind Condominium eAse indicate any other fie that slay be used .'in unusi�a }or special cirtumstaRees , based upon unit type, 34aed on a housing survey coupletA in 14143, this Central 3thool Ask District uses an overall atudtent generation factor of .4252 for all types of housing. 3. Rased upon the District's master Plan, indicate 'what ratio of pupils/school site 4s used in your District. Is this ratio c®nsisUNZ with State guiddlines or does the District use its own ratio guidelines? Yes NO Explain ibit and. -- If the State guidelines are not use please indicate the reason. 4. Will a Change 4n 4lie multi-i'aaily unit mix ms discussed in each of the three land use scenarios affect this pupil/school site ration for ywr district t°or each of the t:.ree land use scenarios? Current: Yea no Anticipated Ratio Scenario (1):7T@s 110 AntiaSPated tie Scenario (2): VQ= No Anticipated Ratio,. � . Are z:,e changes considered to be K aigni ficafit impact by 't%Q District? w® � 1/3114I-Pq,./ S, What impact will tge proposed change in multi-family unit mix proposed In the throe scenarios have on your Capital Facilities Master Plan? for exhasPle, will a reduction in units Causal an impact in the anticipated construction of new classroom facilities or acquisition of school sites or affect the acquisition of now equipment or on-site improve sh�red,�at3oa erod not aagata the accessit4 of buildiao new achools. Sawever, it would release socte of now I*&sod portable classrooms and the associated costs. d. Will a Change in the nntieipatad number of units and students proposed in the Wit`;`e Scenaario& affgCt the District t impaction status with the State with, regards to funding for additional seha' t facil,`tits? Central School District is"currently unsble to obtain 'timely staats funding to maintain desired mite j9A4Ug , ratio. _ J. What impact will the proposed change'In the anticipated number of units and students for eaci scenario have on the District's, revenue generation? see Zxhibit •c• -„ I Please indicate the anticipatedrevenue generation for each scenario listed below. f Current: Scenario 3) Scenario (2 Will this change to revenue be considered a significant impact by th® Nitrict? - No S, ire there an factors that you feel will be significantly. y ot'.er , effected as a result of any one of the three proposed band ux scenarios? Thas al lity 'Of instruction is ia:acrass 4 with 1�a _transiaM Teacher morale seed asaaatisfaciian is greater when the student population 36 more stable, i.e. single-family homeg. 9. Will any one of the three land use scenarios have a significant impact on the District's' ability to provide quality educational services? -- Central School District sup orts theAM 7t2 � S-ecaario. 4, 1f31/91-Pg. 2$ E7- 3a!� f� 10-2,90 �IdSib#,t"A" #1 Anticipated build-out student generation 'fiqures (based on current city General Plan) rrr nEa �xa�x ,. SP 55-65 Units X .4252 SGF 24 - 25 students MU 1033-1142 units X .4252 SGlr m 484 students Generates baVveesi �.. a - 514 students L �s �riB Sly 302 354 its X .42-S2 SGP n 129 151 students /n/' F4tT 382 4a13 t1Yb, d X e4252 Sr? Sea 0 �t34 $t�s38a*ts Generates between SF 176 - 208 units X .4252 ® 70 - 59 students MU 734 802 units X .4252 ® 212 - 341 students-= Generatess between 3��43a 0�tmideRC * 179 students less than t!!4 pax`Qf 514 (approx. 6 classrooms) 64 students laze than t e sax Of 614 (approx. 3 classrooms) 1 3 9Y:P 29 Exhibit "B" 02 PUPIL/seise-a - 81TR -600 - 690 students for elamee;ltary xchee31 sites 1000 v 1200 students for middle school sites State loading standards: 1) Enrollment capacity based on total chargeable area: 59 sq. ft. per student for elementary school site 80 sq.. ft. per student for middle school site a) State recommended site cepacity 96.8 student/acre for elementary school sit* 67 student/acre for saddle school site cLxsasaeao� LOADZ2ith 1) All permanent and portable classrooms are loaded based upon the following criteria: Kindergarten: 30 pupils (60 for double session) Grades l - 3: 30 pupils Grades 4 - 6: 30 pupilsi Grades e - 8: 30 pupils Special Ed. all grades: 12 pupils/Learning Handicapped a) Capacity of specializead",classrooms or labs for Grades '7_ 8 are adjusted based upon a 6-period day, which i `a factor of .857 3) Physical 'Education loading at the junior high level is 40 stude3nts ,,grer clews. 4) A 95% utilisation factor is used to account for variance in class siw and available space at the grade lever of the enrolling *Ieementary student. A 904 utilization factor is used for junior high and middle schools to account for variances in class size and scheduling diffic:ilties of individual students. 5) State classroom loading for Kindergarten - 55 students Grader's 1-3 - 29 students Grades 4-6 =` 33 students Grades 7-3 - 30 students I I Exhibit "C" #7 Revenue Gemerstion for Each Scenario 463-514 students X ,$5032 $2,329,816 - $2,6860448 292-335 students X :$5032 a $1,469,344 1,685,720 fiCmwI® 42 388-430 students X $5031 _ $1,927,256 $2,163,760 I( • Jr t 1/31� Pg� f s Latta r2 OF TRUSTM I t; LDRt F..A�X)S tax s8ADSMAw ONZALES ! OF RANCHO CUB e WV ADMINISTM-- JUUA^IMCOM v JOQ l 40 E CO MLCI E1Gi1 j5s . SLP 2.a Ivy M6 Archibald Paanue � � o •' C Caluomta 917304698 (714)987-M2 SeptwLber 20, 1990 Mal;;.r BtMis :Stout City of Rancho Cucauoma . P.O. Box 807 Rancho CuCamonga, CA 91729 Dear mayor Stout: � Attached is a Completed Mltl-family gU*Stionnaise Board of T=StM of the CUCanongs col Disrtaict. Thant you for soliciting o= input an this impowtMt Alarm" decision for the city. If I can ansver any questions regardin tmo questionnaire, please don't hesitate to Cavtact in. •~_ac• �w i. ll®, M.D. iRtAndaft- atta V -32 MULTI-FAMILY QUESTIONNAIRE j The following questions are designed to provide necessary input to the City and assist in making a decision with regard to the multi-family unit study. 1. For each of the three scenarios discussed in the attached letter please indicate what your anticipated build-out student generation figures will be. Current: 128-145 Scenario 1 Scenario (2)- - i 2. Based upon the District's Muster Plan or other related studies, please indicate the student generation factors (SGF) that are used for the various land use types: Multi-Family (general! 49 Apartments 49 Single `Family (general) - ; Attached .49 — ; Detached 49 ; and Condominium .49 Please indicate 9 any other that nay be used in unusual or special circumstances based."pan unit type. AWL 3. Based upoit the District's Master Plan, indicate what ratio of pupils/school site is used in your District. Is this ratio consistent with State guidelines or does the District use its own ratio guidelines? Yes No X Explain If the State guidelines are not'dse please indicate the reason. 4. Will a change in the multi-family unit mix as discussed in each of She three land use scenarios affect this pupil/school site ration for your district for each of the three land use scenarios? - Current: Yes No X Anticipated Ratio h Scenario ),Yes Now„ Anticipated L1tI ,I Scenario (2): Yes= No X Anticipated Ratio Are the changes consider .d to be a significant impact by the District? NO r 1/3 191-Pq. 33 � i - 5. What impact will the proposed change in multi-family• unit mix proposed in the three scenarios have on your Capital Facilities Master Plan? For example, will a reduction in units cause an impact in the anticipated construction of new classroom facilities or acquisition of school sites or affect the acquisition of new equipment or on-site improvements? Minor reduction in need for new classrooms 6. Wili a change in the anticipated number of units and students proposed in the three scenarios affect the District's impaction status with the State with regards,!to fundisig for additional school facilities? No 7. What impact will the proposed change in the anticipated number of units and students for each scenario have on the District's revenue generation? Reduction in total revenue generation ii Please indicate the anticipated revenue generation for each scenario listed' below. Current: 362,880-411,075 Scenario 1 19 Scenario (2)M, , Will this change in revenue be considered a significant .mpact by the District? Yes 8. Are there any other factors that you feel will be significa,Lly effected as a recs;lt of any one of the three proposed land use scenarios? No 9, Will any one of the threo land use scenarios have a significant impact on the District's ability to provide quality edurational services? Yes - in this districe tha large number of multi_fAmily ur;its__sianificantly impacts our ability to arovide nuality education because of the high transiency rate associated with multi-family units. 3 a 1/ 1/ 1_Pg. 34 a Zt1 - JIM MULTI-FAMILY QUESTIONNAIRE, �"i11 ThE following questions are designed to provide necessary input to-the City and assist in making a decision with rega-,d, to the multi-family unit study. 1. For each (,f the three scenarios discussed in the attaches` letter please indicate what your anticipated build-out student generation figures will be C rrent: 6 166-- ` enario 1 - -scenario (21 4.943 !i 812 i 2. Based upon the District's ftster Plan or othe►, related studies, please indicate the student generation factors (S6F) th4t are used for the various land use types:, Multi-Family (general) &er r DU ; Apartrii6ts .6 per DU ; Single Family (general) .6per'DU Attached ,5 oer DU ; Detached 6 uer OU; and Condominium 16 g2r DU Please indicate Tny other SFGs that may be used in unusual or special circumstances based upon unit type. ,3. 4asec upon the alstrict's Master Plan, indicate what ratio ot._ELSWAR.,�' pupils/school site is used in your District. 600-I O(E,,, Is this ratio consistent with State`guid_e_tines or does the District\I:..70' 1ATE4, use its own ratio guidelines? Yes No WA 1.00D- 1,200 Fxnlain S€r. below If the State guidelines are not use please indicate the reason. There are no ate auiddelings in relation to the number of stLdents ,ggr school,,,,nly on the number of acteg oer tdog of school site. I 4. Will a change in the multi-family untit mix as discussed in each cf the three land un scenarios affect this pupil/school site ration for your district°for each of the three land use scenarios? ' Current: Yes No X Anticipated Ratio Same Scenario M. Yeq�" too X Anticipated io Same Scenario .2): Yes No X Anticipated Cdatio Saar Are the changes considered to be 'a significant impact by the District? On"y in totsl numbers 1/31/Ql Pg, 35� ,/� a' 4 S. What impact will the proposed change in multi-family unit mix proposed in the three scenarios have on ,your Capital Facilities Master Plan? For`exomple, will a reduction''in units cause,an impact in the anticipated construction of new classroom facilitie3 or acquisition of School sites or affect the acquisition of now equipment or on-Site improvements? The affect of the three mixes would seem to have a mini rtaI affect on he number of nee+ classraoms 'I neLiled or'sites renuiredd,;' 6. Will a change in the anticipated number of units, and students proposed in the the Distr he three scenarios affect .,ct's impaction action status with the Mate with regards to funding for additional school facilities? HO 7. What impact will the proposed change in the anticipated number c>f units and students for eac.r=icenario have on the District's revenue generation? Lesser units will, of course lessen the developer fees a that the district will be able to collect. Please indicate the anticipated revenue generation for each scenario listed below. Current: $41 373 810 (Including square footage and special tax assessment) Scenario t��'nS7�5 (Including sggsare footage and special tax assessment) Scenario (2) $36,519,990 (Including square footage and special tax assessment) Will this change in ftkronue be consio>tred a"' significant impact by the District? Yes 8. Are there any other factors that you feel be signs, antly effected as a result of any one of the *nree proposed land use scenarios? No 9. Will any one of the three land use scenarios have a- significa `. impact on the Dis .rict's ability to ;provict quality e¢ucatiFn'. 'j services? No Aft 1/31/91-Pg. 36 --` PART VII -EFFECTS ON SERVICES MD,ANTICIPATED REVENUES SECOND WORKSHOP LAW ENFORCEMENT At the last workshop, the City Council directed staff and the Police Department to determine the relationship between law enforcement services and housing density. At the latter part of last year. the Police Department totaled the number of calls for servicz for selected multiple family complexes and single family neighborhoods and crovided staff with the numbers, MULTIPLE FAMILY - The Punning Department selected 31 ,complexes,; from various parts of the Cii;�, representing 66 percent (6,508 dw );`ing units) of the City's total'?;multiple family dwelling units, am `the Police Department researched th ,total number of calls for service for each complex during a period- August 1, 1990 to November 25, 1990 (see Exhibit "A"). With this information, we determined the number of calls received per dwelling unit to compare the call rates for the various complexes. The number of ;skis per unit varied from a low of .017 to a high of .721 with an average number of calls per unit of .218 for multiple family dwellings. Of the 3.1 complexes surveyel, 26 were apartments, 2 were senior apartments, 2 wr:,,t town homes, and 1 was condominiums. Three of the apartment complexes participate in the Section 8 housing program and 7 apartment complexes participate in the Mortgage Revenue Program. Upon review of the information provided, staff found no correlation' between the number of calls per jervice and subsidized housing.. In fact, of the 31 complexes surVe?zd, all 3 complexes with Section 8 housing were within the six lowest number of calls for service averaging .156 calls per duelling unit. In addition, the size of the apartment complex did not appear to be a factor with the number of calls for service. 1f31/91--Pg. 37 I' SINGLE FAMILY - The Police Department has divided the City into 51 reporting districts and to determine the single `family"calls fot- service, the Police Department provided the total number of calls for three districts during d period from September 1, 1990 to December 19, 1990 (see Exhibit "B"). Alta Loma, Caryn Planned Community, and North Town were included in the selected districts which accounted f(--,l 8 perceit (1,835 dwelling units) of the total single family dwelling units in the City. The average number of calls per unit ranged from .204 for the Caryn Plcined Community reporting district to 3.746 for the North Town repor ing district with an average of .469 calls„per dwelling unit. The Police Department has indicated that. this rate is not unus;taily high for the North Town area. Excluding I, Nortti?Town, which had ani,,unusually high number of calls for service, the average single family cabs for service vas .243 per dwellin4 unit. Amok CONCLUSIONS From the informatiorir'--provided, no apparent relationship exists between multiple family dwelling units0 and higher calls for service. Single family homes averaged)_ calls per &a. ling unit while multiple family complexes averaged _c zx calls per dwelling unit. In addition, no apparent relationship-,:-xists bei..,eea subsidized housing projects, which averaged .156 calls per dwE:l'JW g unit and higher calls for service. t 1/31./91--Pg. -18 POLICE CALLS FOR SERVICE MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS RANKED FFIOM HIGH TO LOW Rank Urft T Name/Location *of D!U #of Calls Calls Der D/U twbs D/U%Subs 1 Apt. Rancho Villa 68 49 0.721 0 0 8033 Ramona Ave. Or .u....:...>:.:t r a•&:..:.,.a'x .�:r:�",.�....,..,w.a ,ate;..<.z ah.:a: 3 Apt. Alta Park 325 142 0.437 75.M.Revl 23% 13400 Arrow RIB x.' ,�• . jig q�i�'iu\� aril\ +""�'a rfi •ay. m 'i;.��F'<'ti`"sr'�8u;�' 2`jit 5 Apt Woodsong Village 280 105 0.375 0 0 $� y8iz�55,�V}iinn arri Ave �p 4SVR: s\�'r"`�?` \Z >�'�� � a`tai v,..•..,yi \��� 's as '��.�.,�� \�, .u� a�i:'{.�`\•7en y, a�*..,a€,��'. ,i'.Z,.,... ..`a.;xaaw,,,Y..����. �ar3,{9;P.aw..aa�`` `.�.,a.`a.�"� �v,:.,?w,•lv�� w'v.,,��,w"�.Y.za,.:�a,'�:2A:cc��:..•.,,::x 7 Apt. Mouritainside 384 109 0.2114 1 0 0 9181 Foothill Blvd ..a S ., S„uc.�„v �� x\,••. .fw^aY t�z•.ua�� '� � :3„ .:s:.'�. a�k.,•�.`4^' Apt. Lynnehaver. 308' 8511 76 0 0 10655 Lemon Ave 4 e v'.°3-x<g� w �\t ^F. '"� x�c hx ....,...�,M«tyx¢� '..,c•� 11 Apt Woodbend 120 32 0267 0 0 7�0r400Arrchibald A�jve �$' .•\.,x\ \\ LIH.Otto M�v�A�•iQ�i3' � ...i:e�a.:.ift'.,..�cx... zt�.,,,,a�✓ �;o.3..awsa z�n.a: \a H».ma.:;;: `t,.�wcat4:.w 13 Apt. Lomita Court 72 7 0.236 0 0 960i0�Loo�miita Ct yy 15 "Apt. Don Miguel 200 42 0.21 0 M.Rev 20"Yb y MT .\Sw�•a��q�F�lnIi2i 3x� \2M1iKiIYL�.� ) � \ �Y� `.`.`�.� ..;a.:a���x �'.C!!�� ik�..�?z'zia�k,.'L;�2`.µit�,''.z, ��,s�.'�P'.iw�a4„ ��:;"`."\'��s,-. Ak..3•.v'�.2c �a..�.:�� 17 Apt- ge 63 9 0.143 0 1 p _ 7781 Archibald Ave. NaFRK�igF 19 Api. Parkview Piace 154 21 0.136 0-M.Rev 19% 10930 Tena Vista Pkw t Apt. Apartrmnt Conv&ox Condo. Cozdominlum Complex Town Hse Town Houses M.Rev. Mortgage Revenue Subsidizei Housing Program Sec.8 Section 8 subsidized Housing Program tr, Survey Period: AuLust 1 thru Novem"r 25.1990 1z" 1p Or. R M&CMICAMONG-I P A2NMIv�`x fp�SIQN IT'Elv1 tadldfai6-Prmily Workshop TITLE:Police Calls For Service E M V11-2 SCALE: NONE• r Rank Unit T fJame'Lacation #of D/U#of Cans Calls per D/U Subs Ohl, Subs 21 Ap, [MdIJR?a.n Viaiv 270 35 013 54 9v )O% F 10935 Term Vista Pkw - �.a�>.$... .:�s. ,' mum. w.x. .x ww w t vas w3 »aaa rates av . 23 own Hse Wilbw Park 126 '12 0.094 0 D gq �yTV Ras yt�&Milli t len 2S Apt Pep>7nvood 230 18 0.07$ M.Rw 2096 9055 ;oothM Blvd � atltia'tc xz v.: , 27 own Hse Stonegate 90 5 0 D 0 0 Baseline&Ramona 29 `pf s Lei Mar ��. 2e0�k,..� 10 a 0 .^' 7903 Elm-Ave za- :x 31 'Sr.Apt. Her ta{� 232 4 Paris 4i.C1 7 50 Ser;B 22°k 9601 L6—P Apt. Apartment Complex Condo, Condominium Complex Town Hse Tcwn Houses M.Rev. Mori aqe Revenue Subsidized 4ousinrq Proyrym Sec.3 Sectit n 8 subsidim:Housing P-iograrrt Survey Period: August 1 thus November 25,1990 j t Y5 CITY OF RANCH + LTCt?u'VFOD4GA hR: sad hfuiti•Family\'lo►3;s op P�_FiNNiI�1Cx7�/I�IOIoT =E:Police Calls For Service U > MIT: t/1t-3 sc.�i. . NONE 1/31/91-Pg. 40 POLICE CALLS FOR SERVICE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS Renorlinci DistrictlCornnurnly #of D/U I#of Callsl Calm oer DAJ 42 PAa G n2 $t3�Fg`S;ii4.�j51liiIS..?33.042.012 , Total Dwelling Ur.4s: 1,835 Percent of Total SF D/U in City: 1% Tot,a Calls for Service: 860 Avenge Calls per Dwelling Unit: .469 F tti'iing Nortt-r-PM Total Dwelling Units:, 1;717 Percent of Total SF LN in City: ?% Total a::lls for Service: 418 Average Calls per Dwsiliing Unit: .243 Survey Period'. September 1 thru Dacembar 19,199Q GTI'Y' OF �PUCAM®NGR PLAItTi�Tii�3C' T It IOI+1 Tt�M: zna multi-F ily Wwksht TTn E;Police Calls For Semice �:XHmrr J!/-4 SCALE: NONE r 6 y � c w to co 1 v jAr r0lrgit3, 6 4 is, N .. as NEW a!a 9Dt? _ a y Koar C) ! — Qo GS ® © p — G1 $A!wizt117tii A. a t Iu .g. . La .1 3Ae rfalK: 4" o _. ~N.. L N N 1 ®�: as r tiros w • ►�. � Hwl p h cA U q7 a 71 Vie, ♦ Ar $ �� - is'+.rtg •� � 47 j ;3�'��1�,ya�, �^; � 1 altvraro � G a o a A!r ri 99D N a is ir7Kmolr :� ' Let rQ CaAn r 1131/91VP�� i it a ti 10 a W Ill M 1� •r r wA l �: 3ar?'.C■r■143 vim A" EC 'H m LS r.a ,aor ui tj D■s nIy1�11M. �.rD■ r CO a N N cc P z N - t 3w■7m r 3Atl Li3AtlN (� $ .N N •v. r» j P 3.r CWOIWZ V (j m g } �, W. Vol ' � a �y 3E LgD6 N Yf � y •(��y�•�+y}2 1`.."F� �� cps■ ® �/ A.y ar ,Fs� • w eFi_p-iyi, _gg as anMra.s �r, o a f z 1/31/91 pq. 43 i CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOPS Multi-Family Development Seoo�j Workshop i Part VIII LEGAL CONS -.a i I PART VIII - LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS "- SECOND WTIRit'SHOP At the first multi-family development workshop, the City Souncil ., requested that staff contact"Lewi.s Homes to determine if the firm would consider i-kd^±endments to the Terra Vista development Agreement as part of i City-wide General Plan Amendment. The. issue was :brought 10 the attentio' .' of the company and Mr. Joseph M. Oleson of Lewis Homes Marra,,...)ent Corporation, responded with the attached letter to the City j Planner on October 9, 1990: I The company's response can be summed up in the .following: "The Lewis Companies will not.rons. der s voluntary reduction in densities or any adjustments to :and uses currently proposed with the Terra Vista Community Plans Any City proposals for residential density reductions in exchange for other land use or developmental entitlements or concessions will be consideredion a case-by-case basis." As a result, the adjustments to reducing the density on multi-family land should not include the Terra Vista Planner, Com.:nunity. s, 1/31/91 Pg. ,44 n Lewis Domes Management Corp. 1156 North Mountain Avenue/P.O.Box 670/Upland.California 91785 714/985-0971 FAX.714/949-6700 October_ 9, 1990 Mr. Brad Buller City Planner City of Rancho Cu%:amonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P. O.. BOX 807 - Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91723 Re: TC-Xra Vista - Development Densities Dear Brad' on August 9, 1990, the City Council held a workshop 'on City wide density projections. The workshop was set to address a concern that the City's projected build-out ratio of 35% multi-family housing is too high and should be adjusted to reflect less multi-family (high density) housing. Terra Vista was included in Staff"s analysis of the City-wide . ratios. However, the Staff presentation and the City Attorney's opinion (referencm Part Vll of the Staff Report) made it clear that densities could be reduced only by mutual agreement because the Terra Vista Development Agreement includes provisions which guarantee the number of dwelling units which may be constructed. Acknowledging this, the City Council instructed Staff to meet with LewiQ. Homes' representatives. 9n Augclkst 30, 1,190, Don Thompson and 1 met with you and Rick Gnmez to discuss the issues raised at the workshop. Our position, as stated on August. 30th, has not changed: The Lewis Companies will not consider a voluntary reduction in densities or any adjustments to land uses currently 1 proposed within the Terra Vista Community Plan, Any City proposals for residential density reductions in exchange for other land use or developmental entitlements or concessions will be considered on a case-by-care basis. At the August 30th meeting you r-iported that the City was initiating art amendment tc the Terra Vista Community Plan . which would require City Council review of any residential use redesignations under Section yI of the Plan. 2/31/9I-Pc 45 �J Mr. Brad Buller October 9, 1990 Page 2 We have no specific objection to the �.-ropo= r-:review, btitJj guesti", why the Council would want to bringythe issue to -- public forum w�heit there is_ really nq choice b�tt to allow the flexibility built, intn=the Plan in order to,,implement the Development hgre-ment. our.,acquiescence is'based on a strict interpretation of the density guarantees provided in the Agreement. The proposed City Council review will likewise be subject to the same negotiated and binding g'u�Fantee Very truly yours. 70pHO S OF CALIFORNIA Ol on Authorized Agent t JMOaksk 1/31/91 Pg. 46,E--.:) � 1� — CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 20, 1991 i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brag. Buller, City Planner BY: ` Alan Warren, Associate Planner ff SUBJECT,: HULTI-FAMILY DEVEWPMENT I , RECOK-45NDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution of Intent regarding the future multi-family housing unit percentage, and upgrading' the City's development and property management standards. f BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: Since the last workshop, staff has, at i Council's direction, modified the Resolution. Included' is a more i r--p,?listic single family/multi-family target patio of 35 percent. Also included are statements identii•ying the need for stronger develupment, design and maintenance standards. Staff estimated that if all the uncommitted multi-family rand ir,,jhe City, except that in Terra Vista, was rcd;sced to Lour-Medium, the'..dtia at build-out would be around 70.8 percent SFR/29.2 percent, XPR. Further, if it is assumed that at least some of the vacant multi-family land should appropriately remain as multi-farilly, then a slightly high6, multi-family percentage should be considered for a low end ratio.- Staff therefore suggests a percentage of no less than 32 percent multi-family if the Council wishes to aim for as low a percentage as, conceivably possible. On the high end, staff believes that a 35 percent ratio is more realistic. The Council indicated that multi-family density reductions might be called for in Etiwanda and in Victoria north of Base Line Road. Looking at the significant areas of vacant multi-family land in relation to the Council's views. a 35> percent MFR ratio was attained by acreage reductions as follows: Etiwanda - 75 percent Medium acreage reduction to Low Medium Victoria - 99 percent High acreage reduction to Medium High - 50 percent Medium High.,,acreage reduction to Medium j - 75 percent Medium acreage reduction to Low Medium General City „ - 25 pe cent Medium acreage reduction to Low Medium. CITY COUNCYL 5T,, REPORT � MULTI-FAMILY OEVELOPME�,, February 20,,1991 Page '2 AIML -ti Therefore, sr;9ff estimates a 3Z to 35 percent multi-family range at build-out is attainable based on the assumption., thet most 0 the uncommitte, muiti-family land which is down-zoned' wi1; remain in the residential categories and 'Nerefore result in ne,t increases in' future single family unit t`stimates. 0 if the "ity Council approves the attached Resolution of Intent, stafs) is prepared to begin tfe discussion of establishing 'rograms and sche3ules 1 for the land usa- an.. design amendments with the Planning Commission at its February 27, 1991"meeting, In Mar--:h, staff will present a strategy with a timetable for the C.mmission's ;consideration. Staff will keep the City Council informed as to the Planning Commission's desires and progress in this i,,?gard. Re ssub , B - City Planner BB:AW:mlg Attachments: Workshop Minutes of January 31, 199 Resolution of Intent i ��s January 31, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Pdiournad Meeting ,1 A. CALL'TO ORDER An adjourned meeting o1 eg City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met Thursday, January 31, 1991 in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Counetilmembers William",'. Alexander (arrived 7:43 p.m.), Charles' a'. Buquet II, Diane Williams, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Denn!..s L. Stout. Also present were; Jack Lrm, City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City:( Manager, Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Aevslopment Director; Olen Jones, Sr. RDA Analyst; 13rad Buller, City Planners Larry enderson, Principal Planner; Alan Warren, Associate Planner; Vince Bertani, AML f! Assistant Planner; Capt. Bruce Zoiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police tepartment; and p Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. ` ITEM or DISCUSSION B1. DISCUSSION OF MULTIPLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT - The purpose of this meeting is to discuss multi-family development in general throughout the City. There will be no discussion regarding specific projects. f Brad Buller, City Planar, stated Rtaff would be walking the City"'Couucil through some of the questions they had from the previous multi-family development workshop. He added there is a Resolution in the agenda packet for the City Council to consider which could be brought back at a future Council meeting for approval if the Council concurred. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented a detailed staff report from the information submitted in the packet. Councilmember F;Qquet asked if there really were over 8,000 multi-family dwelling units as �:icLted in the staff report because he felt the total would be lest. City Council Minutes January 31, 1991 Page 2 AM Alan warren, Associate Planner, stated this figure was General City, not the entire City, and-explained how staff goes about determining this figure by means of business license renords and sending personnel out in the field to determine this. Mayor Stout stated he felt there wei.e less units also. Sharon Boydston, 7066 Del Mar Court, stated she agrkled that this figure was accurate. Councismember Wright stated she felt.there were some multi-family units missing } from the map. Mayor Stout openr4 the meeting for public input. Addressing the'Cl ty Council were: Sharon Boydston, 7066 Del Mar Court, stated she felt the City was not heading in the right direction. She felt there were more multi-fam'.:: dwelling units than what the City had planned on having. She stated it was her opinion that a strain was being placed on the schoo.La by having to many multi-family dwelling unite. She added she has not heard one resident state they wanted more apartment buildings. aouncilmember Alexander arrived st 7:43 p.m. Ms. Boydaton felt measures should be approved to reducs multi-family development, and added she felt growth: was gccd but not high density. She utated the City should take nto consideration what waa fair to all residents. Mike Dubbs, 6A69 Rovato Place, Victoria Planned Community, stated he felt law enforcement should study the undesirable types of crime a..d in igate where it cornea from. Councilmember Buquet felt crime atatistiC2 should be broken down into single- family versus multifamily.' Mr. Dubbs asked if density tar square mil-I had been looked at;. He felt the over crowding caused higher crime ar traffic problems. As added he die' not see a difference in architectu: a from multi-family' and single- family. Bob Dutton, 9617 Carrari, stated hit is an advocate oic controlled growth. j He felt the City Council should consider an Ordinar a suc* is the one Colorado has whereby there were severe fines on landlords who knowingly allowed ds;g activity and other illegal acts to exist in the.Le buildings. He asked when the city vas originally planned out, was it based on a t lIty Counci'i minutes January 31, 1991 Page 3 certain density and development taking and then fees that come in from that dsvelopmsnt,would pay the cost of all the various improvements avid uo forth, He askeJ how much would it increase hone construction if densities are lowered. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated with more units, you would, be able to spread Lne':cost over all those properties. He stated if you have more open space, the Jamo maintenance cost would have to be spread.over fewer units, making iL the as"asment h,.ghgr. Bernie Savalstead, Jail wastcliff, Newport 'Beach, stated he was a former City Counc lmcmber from Fountain Val ay, and tl;at it sounded to him like the Council was considnrAng down zcning the entire City with a few exceptions, and asked if in the and would the Cttcy Council get into a planning process that would look into certain projerties t;-.zt are moxa :tuned into multi-family: rather than single-family residential. He added if the Council comes up with a certain peresntagei,;to get to a compromise or and result, would they take this property, by pi>operty, or would they just do various designated areas. Mayor Stout stated the City Council has riot decided on a p;•licy yet, but that (; once they did', they w-)uld be giving direction to the Planning Commission. Mayor btout inviter: the public to give their cdamsnts se the Council was <> discuouinc this item. Mayor Stouf: stated that he recently went on a field tour and' felt the quality of construction was not the best in certain areas. Re felt future multi-family ! development units should be built of quality �mnatsuction and thit maintenance it of these units should be >onsidered also. Eik stoned he has had i'bblems with the Etiwanda cpeaifLc Flan from the beginning. felt this should be looked ! at as c startinsl point and: re-do the densities in order to make it a rural !I country atmosprere au it was originally designed. He star,i with xespect t)the Victoria area, he fe' there was very little t. ,,i,-family included in this project north of Bas_ *,'ine,; He stated there hap�na to be some areas in the middle area of this project near the Edison Corrid,-rs where there is medium high, lw-medium, medium and so forth that should be Looked at because: they are sandwiched between single-family residential between the Vineyards and the Windrows, which is what he plan currently shows. He added he is a lot more flexible with the mom.,c -A sounding the lake area. Its stated l.%did not know what to do with the Texra 7-.lea area, and :felt It was a poor decision in the first place to enter into this agreemont. He stated the General ^ity side should be looked at as far as.vizintensnce of those units. He felt th( poop le tl.,at are in the condominium unity txe people who have more of a tie tv the communit':and that there are not as mutile problems in this type of unite. He advised:.of some apartments that are trying to .oavert to conOominiams raid felt it -sss goc4 co ".T ire some of the projacts to have conA.«iricm standards. City Council Minutes January 31, 1991 Page 4 Councilmember Alexander stated when he went on the multi-family field tour this week with Councilmember Williams and staff that it was mentioned staff would work on getting some maintenance type agreements for multi-family dwelling units. He did not think the City should come down on multi-family units as a whole as long as the quality was there. Mayor Stout stated he felt there was too much flexibility in density. He felt better quality and design was needed as,well. Councilmember Buquet stated he had also been on the field tour last weekend and thought the tour was interesting. He commented on the variable densities he saw while on the tour. He added high standards in design were needed and also maintenance of multi.-family dwelling unite. He stated there were some multi- family projects that he would not go into after dark.; He felt compatibility should be exercised for multi-family and single-family units. He suggested regulations on the munber of units built should be considered, especially for multi-family units. He suggested service charges be placed on those individuals where a police call is placed because people can't get along. He also agreed with Mayor Stout about maintenance of units. He also stated he would like to see compact parking spaces eliminated starting with the multi-family units. Councilmember Wright told the history of how density was determined as the City began. She stated she felt the City has responsibly tried to place the multi- family units in the right place as it progressed. She stated that the City then got involved with planned communities, but that it was not working out as the City had planned. She felt quality should be higher. She felt condo-type projects were more appealing to her and the residents of the City. She felt the crowding of apartments in Victoria should be reconsidered, and also felt the Etiwanda Specific Plan shc,eld be looked at. Shia added she did not necessarily feel high re; 'ts would make a project nicer either. She felt people should be aware of assessment impacts regarding this matter. Councilmember Williams stated sr4 agreed with Councilmember Alexander about there needing to be a code of management for multi-family units. She stated apartments are on all major streets. She felt there needed to be different architecture for these units in order to make them more appealing. She felt the City needed to pay more attention to what is being built, but not necessarily have a moratorium. She concluded by stating her major concern was a transition in the buffers and the planning. She did not think the actual density was the issue because she felt that parcel by parcel that could be settled. Councilmember Buquet stated that on ,some of the multi-family projects the landlord will take anyone as a tenant just to occupy a unit, and suggested that there be conditions to do a phased construction and occupancy process so there is an easing Into total occupancy. He also stated he felt management companies would assist in this area. Councilmember -Wright felt density per square mile should also be looked at because it would affect the quality of life. She did not feel a lot of high density units,should be placed in one area because this would affect the quality of life. City Council Minutes January 31, 1991 Page 5 Ah Mayor -Stout stated what he is hearing from the Council is that quality of construction and maintenance of a development are very important. He stated he Liked Councilmember Buquet'a comments on phasing the number of-units to be built and also phasing of occupancy. He felt density ranges ;ihorld be looked at as it relates to the type of product being;produced. He felt an aggressive City Housing Authority should also be considered. He felt the Planning Commission should examine the areas that are planned for multi-family development, but not yet ~stilt. Councilmember Buquet stated he felt the multi-family development in Terra Vista should be of the highest quality. Councilmember Wright asked what the City cam do to control the multi-family mnits j in Terra Vista for batter quality and higher standards. Councilmember Buquet felt any approvals for multi-family units should be made to meet the same criteria as other projects in the City. Councilmember Alexander stated he did not feel it was right for the schools to have no say in how many units are built, because he felt they needed to make surd they could accommodate all the children. Councilmember Buquet felt the incentive,plans and density bonuses should be f looked at also. He felt more coneLstent.ranges should also be looked at. He AML stated he would like to see the maximum build-out of the City lowered. Councilmember Wright stated she felt the quality of life could be improved by lowering the density now. She felt density should be lowered and established at 758 single-family dwellings/25% multi-family dwellings. L.. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Resolution in the agenda packet leans toward 75% single-faraily dwellings/25% multi-family dwellings. Councilmember Buquet stated he would lik., to see the City get as close to 75% single-family dwellingul25a multi-family 'wellings ,as possible and to work I towards this. I Brad Buller, City Planner, offered for staff to look at those areas that the Council has highlighted such as Victoria, between the Edison corridors, or the area in Etiwanda, to take those numbers in order to form a short term goal. From there they could develop a program on how this can be addressed, bring this back to the City Couccll through the Planning Commission, and evaluate it again after possibly 12-18 months. Mayor Stout felt this needed to be solved within six months and have a policy in place &t than time. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated he did not mean for this to take 18 months before the Council saw it again, but in that time the program would be:in place and then the Council would have some idea if the program was working. �I I city Council Minutes January 31, 1991 Page 6 AOL Councilmember Wright felt a statement should be agreed upon as to what the density is and for the City to stick to this. Brad Buller, Cityj-Planner, stated staff could bring back the information on what the Council has asked _'hem to focus on, and bring back those numbers with a percentage to the Council at the February 20, 1991 meeting for their consideration. Mayor Stout asked staff to look at any other areas they felt were also important..,. Shi£.ey Houston, of Apartment owner's Association, commended the Council on what they were doing at this meeting. She felt it would be better to get people to take pride in their projects°on a. volunteer basijinstead of setting regulations by Ordinance or whatever. She felt thel3wners of multi-family units should he contacted to discuss this program vIth them, as she knew this was working in the cities of La Habra and Montclair. She - asked that the City Council consider her suggestion. She alsoadded you could not deny somp.one rental of a unit if,they Make eno—h,money and have good credit. CouncilmemLer Buquet agreed that the volunteer apprusch was a'good idea, but that some tYFe of code enforcement would also probably be needed. Aft C. COb4F{U4J TYf ICA FROM THE PUBLIC '�1 f` No communication was tirade from the public. D. A*!hT0'G�iMENT MOTION: Moved by Wright,. seconded by Alexander to adjourn, Motion carried unanimously, S-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC city clerk Approved: 5 _ `\J rITY OF RA21CHO CUCAIti�ONGA STAFF REPOfh T DATE: February 27, 1991 TO: 'irman and Members of the planning Commission FR. : Brad Buller, City Planner : S JECTp PUBLIC COMMENT JESS HARRIS' CARYU CGFiPANY ' Attzjhsd is a letter with exhibits from Jess Harris representing the Caryn Company. BQfore filing a full upplica.:ion, Mr. Barris 'mould like to explore With the Commission the possibility of getting policy direction on how the Planning Commission will apply the ?':iwanda Specific Plan and Tree Preservation Ordinance to the site he is planning for development. During the past few months staff has discussed several project options with Mr. Harris and also suggested that hie beat, course of action would now be to submit an application. We further discussed the current' Planning Commission policy and practice as it pertains te,;-fiche application of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and Tree Preservation Ordinance to projects in the paste Further, staff explained to Mr. Harris ,that the Tree Preservatiion Ordinance is=`currently under review/%by the City Co-1ncil's Subcommittee made up of members of the" Planning',\ Commission,"Park and Recreation Commission,, Public Safoty Commission, 'Historic hre:�ervation Commissis, and Environmental Management Commission. Staff racommends that the Planning Commission hear Mr. Harris'-testimony and either (1) set for a future agenda a discussion on how the Planning Commission will apply,''/ the Tres Preservation Ordinance during this Subcommittea review, ',r (2) direct Mr. Harris to submit his application consistent with tht:/current T=ee Preservation Ordinance and Etiwanda Specific Plan. As a reminder, no action of the Planning Commission is required at this time. This is a public comment and no action can be taken other than to set it on an agenda for a future meeting. BB:ga f QV ITEM F { L ®•P LAN DESIGN Ci7r Of RANCH'0 Uq M9NGA GROUP P%FA:pWG'DI'A�'QN FEB PiannlnYti�aDCAcrriiteccwe '.,1 - vjrw�y�,M.j6�r r'Njv�.I Pebtuary 8,1991 Mr.Brad Buller CityPLariner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Dtive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 " : Catyn Company Tracts 14759&14550 Job No. JWP 898 Dear Brads Pursuaw to ourpreevious discussions rgardiag the ffial•,lect tracts 1 would like to request time to present several questions during the"public commtW period at the neat avalable planning ca.:vmiaaion heating. As you know Land Plan Lcoign Group has sltbmitt d,vadores plans over the past year for the two tracts.Motet recently three tvvis.,d concepaW puma were submitted on Tract 14759. Ia order to move forward with mom detailed site planning efforts for both tracts,it is necessary to have greater policy dei'mi8on on whether or Lut Encaiyptus whudmeatt ahoet)d be prraerval,'This provide us with the proper information upon which we can pre rr a full sttbarittal applit tion. I]lave attached c*esof the dnwaitemaCires for tract 14159 for your information. � - l Please feel free to call should you have any ctlorts. V truly e P�Cipat `kiaw encl. , cm Joe Dffodo (`. chren / �4 CON f` f JWMP ltrX8.Ina 34,=xecutive Park,Stlite 1501 Irvine,California 927141(714)474-4200 1 FAX:(714)474.4209 i F rt ZVZVZV�U 01t 91 Fill ERE i 1 IfldQ 1-7 1 1 rr i JJ 32 jig �,,f mom''y \ 1. tTifi 1 � IIII F4 i a w v N Can iN 7w M 4 911 TTT'fi'ij Fr Tm WT ` ` f _. �71 I �'