Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1991/03/27 - Agenda Packet
' �� �4Jx , .,t .. -T ,. s I � � , �i � s' n f � g�` ��, t �, .`��� � J t !- #' �t{kj1 j Y 3 �. �i` f 1 t; vZ' ? CITY OF Alk RANCHO CUCAMONGA z. PLANNING COMMISSION o - o a AGENDA ' z J 1977 > y r WEDNESDAY MATXH 27, 1991 7:00 P.M. RAYCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CE2t` = COUNCIL CHAMBER ` 10300 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAZIFORNIA I. Pledge of A7;`;ggianae Ix. Roll Call commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner McNiel _„_ Commissioner Va.7-.lette. „_ Commissioner Melcher 111. Announcements +,, Iv. Approval of Minutes February 27, 1991 Adjourned MeetL. . of February 28, 1991 March 13, 1991 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are ex9ected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the. Commission at one tiite without discussion. If anyone has concern over any itam, it should be removed for discussion. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-18 - BOOTH The development of a building contractors office and storage yard totaling approximat,ly 8,500 square feet on 1.35 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea13) of the lnduetrial Area Specific, Plan, located at 9037 Charles Smith Avenue, east. of Rochester, north of 5th Street - APN:: 229-271-41. Staff' recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 1 D$ Public Hearings Ask The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may -voice their opinion of the related project:. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes--ner individual for each project. Please sign in' aftEr speaking. B. TIME EXTENSION ANP i.40DIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 14055 ' MODERN CORPORATION A request to modify _a one-lot subdivision for condominium purposes to a three-lot subdivision of 215 snits on 10.27 acres of land in the -blediv;n Residential _District .(8-14 dwelling units pcgr acre) located north of Arrow, Highway and easa of Baker'. Avenue APN: 207-201-32 and 12. (continued from March 13, 1991.) C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PIAN HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQ1LG_k-„ In accordance with Article 10.6, Section, 655818. of the California Government 'Code;,,,'a re ,aion and update to the City Housing Element has been prepared. The changes to the document include: an update of Ak the Technical Appendix consisting of _ documentation- and analysis of current demographic trends, statistical information and_ housing assistance needs; update and re-visionz to the Cityts housing objectives and policips; and development of a five year action program designed to implement th,e City's overall housing goal. In addition, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued' from March 13, ,1991.) D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEWR AND_TENTATIVE 'PARCEL MAP 13693 LUNG - A subdivision of 1.0 acre of land into 2 parcels in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Northridge Driver west of Haven Avenue - APN., 201-182-29. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from March 13, 1991.) x E. VARIANCE 91-04 A request to allow a reduction of the minimum average lot size from tV 22,500 to 21,540 square feet for a two-lot ' parcel map in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) , located on the north side of Northridge Drive, west of Haven Avenue - APN: 201-182-29. F. ENV7ROIIME141AL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14 CUNNINGHAM BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A residential- subdivisi.c. and design review of 35 _single famlly lots on 10 acres- of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) , located 364, feet south of 19ti Street on the east side of 'Beryl Street APN: 0202-041-01, 17, 22, and 24.' Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration, Related file: Tree Removal Permit No. 90-10. G. 1MVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MODIFICATION TO TENTACIVE 'TRACT 1362 WATT INLAND EMPIRE -'A request to modify the map to allow a temporary on-site -detention basin -f approximately 170,00o square feet for an approved tentative tract map""of 201 single family lots on 51.6 acres of land in the Low ResiiA,ntial District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located north of 24th Street and west ;jof Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 225a-071-65. Stafx' recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration {i 1r H,; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS MENt AND MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 14139 -r/AHMANSON DEVELOE_nNT A request to modify the map to allow a temporary on-site detention basin of approximately 5.6,000 square feet located on Lots 1-5 for an approved tentative tract map of 119 single family lots on 54 acres of land in the Low Residential Divtcrict (2-4 dwelling units per acre) , located at the southwest corner of ^i-iwanda ,Avenue and 25th Street APN: 225-08i-0i._, Staff recommends issuance of a Negativ,�A' Declaration. 1. CONDITIONAL USE ,PFMMIT 91-06 SOUTHWEST DESIGN GNOTP - The request to establish .an- office use in a'leased space of .2,696 square feet 'within the existing Arrow Business Park on 8.7 acres o land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9307 Arrow Route s APNe 209-012-19. f ", J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 17ARIANCE 90-14 - 1 SCHLOSSER EORGE - A request to reduce the a required number of parking spaces in connection with the development of a 14,000 square foot industrial buildings within an existing manufacturing complex in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial designation (Subarea 9) �-�of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the Southwest corner of, Arrow Route and Fochester Avenue APK. 229-111-17. _ Staff- recommends , issuance of a' Negative Declaration. VII. New Business K. Mi IRONMENTAL ':SSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT`REVIEW 90-21 - 'SCRLOSS FORGE = The development of a 1,00,0 ER square foot industrial building w:Lthin an existing; manufacturing complex in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial designation (Subarea , 9) of the Industrial' Area specific` Plan, IaL3ted at the southwest: corner of Arrow Route``;, and Rochester Avenue APN, 229-111-17. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declalvtinn. DIII. Commission Business IS. Public Comments This is the time and ,place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. X. Adjournment i The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 1100 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. i ; cY.:ver 4er�a pa, GOLLIOI. , M FAfLY1 MAP mmw Dam law pmly ;� • a .nY! moomm a rr ! GV AYO"A•OVI T, C Lmir Y YA •A41A Tc n C" CW RAfQCM C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF*REPORT DATE: March 27, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Jerry Guarracino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-18 - BOOTH The development of a building contractor's office . and storage yard totaling approximately 8,500 square feet on 1.35 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13) of the industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9037 Charles Smith Avenue, e,�st-of Rochester, north of 6th Street - APN: 229-271-41. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Utility easement and vacant property; General Industrial (Subarea 13)' South - Vacant, General Industrial (Subarea 13) East - Inter_tate 15 Freeway West - Ve.cant; General Industrial (Subarea 13) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial/Freeway North - General Industrial/Freeway South - General industrial East - Freeway, General Industrial beyond West - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The project site is currently vacant and contains two Eucalyptus trees and an abandoned vineyard. The site appears flat with a very slight slope-to the southeast. MW A PLANNING CQMISSION STAFF IMPORT DR 89-18 - BOOTH March 27, 1991 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: 7*er of Number of Type Square Parking 'aces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio R, `fired Provided i Office 2,400 1/250 10 10 Warehouse/ 6,070 1/1,000 6 6 - Storage . Total 16 16 II. ANALYSIS: A. General- This project is located in a General Industrial category (Subarea 13) directly adjacent to the I-15, Freeway. special consideration should be gives to the quality of site ' design, architecture, and landscaping of all prope-zties adjacent. to this corridor to preserve and enhance the image of the community. The applicant has addressed these concerns by: eliminating alz roof mounted equipment from proposed structures, providing additional trees along the freeway frontage, eliminating outside storage as a proposed use, and providing pitched rather than flat roof elements where possible. The development is consistent wl::h the development standards of the Industrial Specific Plan. The proposed use is allowed within the General Industrial area and is compatible with the surrounding uses. Following issuance of a Negative Declaration, the City Planner would grant approval subject to conditions recommended by the review committees. B. Design Review Committee "The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Chitiea, Tolstoy, Buller) on January 17, 1991.. The Committee made the following I' recommendations all of which have been reflected on the. revised plans: Eley&tionsc 11. Extend the brick pop-out on the second floor east elevation down to the ground and center the doors within this popped-out area. i 2. Provide a control screed at the base of the facia to ensure a crisp break between colors, 3. An alternative facia color should be submitted for Design +, Review Ccmncittee approval. A more subtle color is f suggested, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 89-18 -,BOOTH March 27, 1991 Page 3 4. The west elevation 4t the warehouse building should be revise , to combine the mass of,the two pop-outs into one pop-out with a pedestrian entrance, Wall Design: ` 1. A raised column cap should be provided at least at the corners of the site and on sack sida of the gated entrance. 2. The metal gate design should be called out on thffplans and should match the crates used on the Coca Cola p.,snt at Haven Avenue and 6th Street or the Edison gates on Archibald Avenue between Hillside and Wilson. 3. vines should be planted along the per, `er wall to discourage graffiti. 4. A lighted address -ign should be-provided on the entry wall. Site Design: I. Provide across-secti6n through the warehouse building to the freeway. 2. Provide evidence of fee ownership of the Metropolitan Water District easement north of the site. If this area is owned by the applicant, trail improvements consistent with City r.andards should be required. 3. Provide the following note on the plans: "No roof-mounted equipment shall be proposed unless a separate Design Review approval is obtained and adequate screening is provided to shield the equipment from viEw of the freeway''or the ec�xipment shall be ground-mounted and screened to the satisfaction of the City Planner." C. Environmental Assessment: Part I and II of the Initial Study have been completed and no significant environmental impacts. have been found as a result of the proposed development. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The plbposed use is consistent with the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan. The building design and site plan togetY'er with recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with the Industrial Specific`Plan and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. t�- w PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 89-18 - BOOTH ' March 27, 991 Page 4 AU qw IV. RECOMMENDt-ioN.-`5tafg:'.reccamends that Planning Commission_ issus a Negative D4claration for Development Review 89-18. Respectf submi s Brad.Bul City P nner BB:JG:mlg; Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C'' Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "B" Elevations r Exhibit "F" - Sections (r r f / FRIr WAY i � i a \ .o u•.o�enf•^• 4:� w n.r...crt++e .. 1// SITE UTILIZATION PLAN i f i. OF I3. ITCFi(3< UCAMQNGA PLANIVIN -.D. LION TME:Lmg, U_i-al;z4�r ur, EXHIBIT: A SCALE: vmoeny map l 1 917E 19 DEFILE � IlM1 RTG J!G ♦�a-^. MCYK [ .! +_��y} � WItMN6 N MciOR�pFNB�.N W ne LW� l CNAR.lB•9fIRN/yFi,; `.. SITE PLAN C Project Date a atom ae: LIGHTING PLAN T.,. ITEM:I) Bq: I CITY OFFiE�ILTCI�(1--c- JCAMONOA PLANKING-DMSTON TTIj-E: EXHIBIT: 1> SCALE: I� c v 0 a I o � F r _eL IWN Mi a p 3 4n: L lv':3E �r ram;k,.r,_�6►9: I WIN iPg ' � ECG`_ �fu]I�11�"' t4��1`►+-� ��, law DO G sr Ei k Eie f:i�C Y� "C ar(;: ae �C �'�E�J • rp y • • I ' AY __ II 1� " W 1, a o� `. .. 0 � � A _ . i f .t j ` MWIMILLI �;F 45 r I S i a r � P H� 10 44 n kmTH SOOT EAST F •' ^r " !AM A.offi,( � rrEM:Off' AA'N0f ,),;, 'rt1Z E PI ANNW4 -I�MSION;UCAMONGA •-mac° •• EXHdBrr: SCALE: 1�T, z Q LL � `zit; • W Ul •:i „Mr E 4 1 X' �:1zz) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT AOL DATE: March 27, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Asset:ate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 14055 - MODERN CORPORATION - A request to modify a one-lot subdivision for condominium purposes to a three-lot subdivision of 115 units on 10.27 acres of land in the Medium Residential District' (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located north of Arrow Highway and east of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-201-32 and,12. (Continued from March 13, 1991). I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 14055 was approved by the Planning Commission on February 8, 1r85`. The project was originally approved as a one-lot subdivisi�-„ far, condominium purposes. The applicant, is requesting that the Tract Map be modified to a three-lot subdivision for financing purposes. ARL II. ANALYSIS: Staff analyzed the proposed modification and determined that it would have no effect on the approved project. However, staff noted that any recreational amenities,: as well as the construction of the automatic gates to the project to the north, should be completed with Phase I consistent with the original phasing plan. In addition, two points of access should be maintained at all times during all phases of construction. Staff has also noted that the Standard Condition requiring the submittal of a school "will serve" letter prior to either the issuance of building permits or recordation of the Tentative Tract Map was not conditioned on approval of the tract. Pursuant to Urgency Ordinance No. 395, both the Central and Chaffey High School Districts were contacted regarding the school impaction issue. Written notification from both districts indicated that there is an impaction problem and that a Condition, of Approval should be added requiring the applicant to participate in a Community facilities District. The Central and Chaffey School Districts indicated that they would attempt to mitigate the impact of additional students through a "mitigation agreement" between themselves and the developer. Therefore, the map was found to be inconsistent with Urgency Ordinance Flo. 395 pertaining to the evaluation of adequate school facilitic; for proposed residential develo gents. The following condition is recommended to be added to the Tract Map: "Prior to the recordation of the Final Map or the issuance of . building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shal" consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the =4 B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVORT 1T 14055 - MODERN CORPORATION March 27, 1991 Page 2 JJ,` /rl project site to provide ;in c6dunction wit', the ,applicable School District for crostruction and, maint,nance of necessary school facilities however,- if an,4 School ;;'listrict has previously establisr s such a Community Fe-J1itijts District, the applicant in the alternative, cGnsent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing district lirior to the recordation of the Final. Map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes fivi. Further, if the affected School District has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twalve months of the date of approval of the Time Extension and prior to the recordation of the Final Map or issuance of building permits for said project, 'this condition shall be deemed null and void. Sho-,ild the District and the developer reach an agreement prior to recordation of the map, this condition shall be deemed null and void." The applicant was notified ' of the above condition on the standard incompleteness letter. III. TIME EXTENSION: This item was continued from the December 12, 1990 agenda at the applicant's regv2st. However, the project would have expired on February 8, 1991; therefore, it is necessary to process;,a Time Extension. EExtensions may be granted in twelve month increments for up to five years from the original approval. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newopaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property uwmers within 300 feet of the project. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends ihat the Planning Commission apprc'z the modification to Tentative. Tract 14055, and grant a one-year extension through adoption of the attached Resolutions.'' Res lly s d;� rf d Bul rXB- City anner BB:BN:ml g Attachments: Exhibit "A" Letter fi�om Applicant Exhibit "B" - lriginal,'Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" Modified' Tentatiw* 'ract Map Exhibit "D" Approved Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Approved Landscape Plan Fxhibit 'F" - Resolution No. 89-26 -odification Resolution of Approval Time Extension Resolution cs November 21, 1990 SENT VIA TELECOPIER City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic :enter Dr. Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Attn: Beverly Nissan Re: TractNo. 14055 Modern corporation Dear Beverly, f The modification request is to have three lots each corresponding to the phase lines. We need the three lots so that the project will be more financially viable under Veterans -Administration guidelines. Very truly your, i L. Ji ,Phi112'ps Vice Pr !�ident IZP/dmf SUBDIVISIONS•LAND PLANNING•CIVIL ENGINEPJNG•CONDOMINIUMS•LAND SURVEYING i 1740 E.HUNTINGTON DRIVE(Suite 206)•DUARTE,CA 91010-PHONE(81 V 359-4511/(213)681-7825•FAX(818)359-4918 1 I lit lit • TA • 41tL- 71 tom• N �- _�ira i+ _ _ _ .i� om lip— f °_ _ a 1_I- •-- 3 ITZ' OFITE;it:: T I4o55 NovmcA°n � RANCHO C N NrA TITLE.Ve,611MAL PLANNING D(VbgoN EXHIBIT: SCALE: `I`comb - i -- �`.. � ��, tare^�� � � ( t •'.• � Y � }� = r L CITY OF rFEM: ` RAN TC G CLJCA MANNING [VISION EXHIBIT SCALE. lot i tv O s i a l f A a P t.`a RESOLUTION No. 89-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ' RA►F-HO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14055, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 115 TOWNHOUSE UNITS ON ,)10.27 ACR OF LAND. LOCATED NORTH OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND EAST OF epj(ER AVENUE IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND ING F!yMINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. Aft: 207-.2AI732 P,NND 12 I A. Recitals. of (i) ' Avaness Industries has filed an application for the approval Resolutio Tentative Tract Map No, Re 14055 as described , in the title of this n. Hereinafter in this Resolution the subject Tentative Tract 1bp request is referred to as "the application".' (if) On the 8th of February, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public. hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date (III) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically fin set forth in the Recitals, y finds that t all of Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.acts 2. Based upon_ substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above.-referenced public hearing on February 8, 989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows Highway and east of Baker thliaSstre to etf nytageeaofd north 132 feet aloe Arrow Highway and 198 feet along Baker Avenue and is pres-7tly vacant, except for two unimproved, dirt roads; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is in the Low-Medium Residential District and is dC,eloped with a mobile- home park the Property to the south of that site consists of older single family residences in the Medium Residential District, theeast e is vact, and the property *to the west is Baker Avenue, withesingle family esidences beyond in the Medium Density Residential District. Vi PLANNING COhMMISISON SOLUTION NO. 89-26 IT 14055 AVANESS ISTRIES February 8, 1989 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission- during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Core, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for. the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by, The public at large, now of record, for accE:s through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and const'dered in compliance with the California 'Environmental Quality Act of 1970 r! `= further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Tentative Tract 14055 1, Some type of interim access between the mobile home nark to the northeast and Arrow Highway and/or Baker- Avenue shall be provided at all times during grading and construction of the project. Prior to occupancy, automatic siding gates shall be installed at the two access points into the mobile home park and gate keys, cards or some other appropriate device shall be issued to residents of the Mobile hone park only. Access shall be rcgtricted for residents of the proposed project through the,,,-. i PLANNING COFMISISO' 7SOLUTION NO. 89-26 TT 14055 - AVANESS JUSTRIES February 8, 1989 Page 3 mobile home park. The.CC'3Rs of the townhouse project shall � require the consistent maintena nce of the gates. Any necessary repairs shall be the responsibility of the Romepwner^' Association and shall be so noted in the CC&Rs. All operatio;:a, { costs shall be borne by the Homeowners' Association of the townhouse project and shall be so noted in the CC&Rs. 2.. Any walls within the proposed project which are to be-greater than 6 feet in height, but 8'feet in height or less, shall require a .Minor Exception prior to issuance of pQrmits. 3. Grading, construction, and the servicing a.jd maintenance of construction equipment shall not occur on Saturdays or Sundays and shall not occur between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Y on weekdays.. g 4. Any unresolved property line conflicts shall be resolved prior f to issuance of building permits. { S. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future tndergrounding of I the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the prr..>ti'ect side of Baker Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to t► -,pproval of the Final Map. The fee shall be the full City adopted unit amount tiates the length of the project frontage. 6. The following reimbursements shall be paid prior to approval "f the Final Map. a. Arrow Route For Lie construction of all street improvements along the property frontage, including the cost for undergrounding the overhead utilities; and b. Baker Avenue — for the construction of all street improvements along the property frontage. 7. Access shall be provided through this project in favor of the existing mobile home park adjacent to the northeast to the satisfaction of the mobile home park owner. It is not the intent that this be reciprocal access to allow traffic flow from this tract to nr through the project to the north. The access shall be rest ved and ti-6 existing blanket easement quit claimed prior to the issuance of any permits or approval of the Final Map, whichever occurs first. The access as shown, on the Tentative Map is acceptable to the City. 8. In order to maintain two means of access for the existing mobile home park adjacent to the northwest, an additional driveway or emergency only access shall be provided onto Balser Avenue within the mobile home park frontage. This condition shall be waived if the access is not agreeable '"a the mobile home park owners. PLANNING COMMISISON R '. iION,10. 89-26 .; 17 14055 - AVANESS INuwrRIES' February 8, 1989 Page 4 qP S. The developer shall provide eac'^; prospective buyer written notice of the access,-.asements gr „ted by the tract map to the residents of the mobile home, park to the northeast, The terms of this easement shall be noted in the 'CC&Rs of the,Homeowners` Association of the townhouse project. 10.; Site directory (monument) sign(s) s,"Jl be provided prior to occupancy at each vehicular entrance to the projec& in coaforman.with;the Sign Ordinance. 11, Permanent dust control measures shall be required and shall include, bot not be Limited to, the provision of sprinklers, soil binders, and cover crops. The above noted provisions shall:'. be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prig to, the issuance of grading permits, 6. The Secretary to this Comrission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1989, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rr, . M M10 na rm ATTEST: Bra ulle, re 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoi,.a Resolution was dtty and regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the Manning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of tote Planning Commission held on the 8th day of February, 1989, by tNe following vote-to-twit: AYES: COM14SSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COWISSIONERS: - PONE ABSENT: COMM?SSIONERS: NONE I a a e a ° � p� n Nip � i a Era w r;p;% eni grin. s SEEN ti,p.n.. lri M£SEaw oagn I'R• w '1 l wte n�O I. 4 LaO N a RE !i 14 g`N M wZ g i.N n n vow ° 9 rtb ra ni 9rpp� iw _pA I nld p 10- w �.V-N9 �• 3t� 'df.i1�0 nQe 045Q aM $n �.N 'n r e S p p $s$ Rmp+ `nid �_ �oG�� }�a•Cwl'w«.aq �iov sw '+��r n� NQ ��ng�aa �9 e'� w®� �a ��w or.��n �i��•n c,pR �Nr E'jio�ksp � n"A'"-rin p on.r n o`+ �•w e, ° � r Day c _ r� w arm t.°w_E..,•'7� 1.5 m�vs' �yS.nw�,nK n �H+�Jn.+pgq r°emqp1s.�'4GOnR Arm �O��TA 6.Gi. ^^S*�e•aaDC.�w A^ ^6_4�>c _<.Nq~a;�yy°n« R^_ $ n � 1:A01 C¢f �' p - VU ff° . _ 'I ryd awn crort Rom'.c• S w� �o� po_-wit m z 4 n pm_n nt o • A N�p N ��� .ci•�A M i p Z.'."^. h 1�$.a'o � oa^,or,1P nan4 �N va C,a a.>w ndo .ate. N"¢g a z,e $'^ A'oao o'n w'n„C <ran.+w•��pv � �4yeCj� �• .<r1 °• .rr a'. Sfl�e.N ° D . 'n�.:-9 .c.;• -ei nM. r:`:M i-ew.^..i cif$R• wM1 -..o,N P iK 1>< I i f x A V- ffi1i-9w Zs n;j aq R+wonn wnanr�n $'nry �<..s R nrn' ,Rr oeo.,o nao roa r a e nr = y a'a `+in Re I P H $w s A q p 0 ^� <� 6 pt.r:� •~e••K+p•��^3 � —so. n..• �p■v =o.QepC® awf�� aq .0 «7.r''.w -9w. MeN��.N NO 1`A. .n�� ftft^p NO Od a��' o'^�'r��. � ���q�„�q� •rpnea en��S,Od�. QN N m^aEqqR»r�...'p8Dne■^�upy6�'`.. br®p_g7<1,e(LY®gir+'^p_i•w«6a rp�..S`I n!;y�as....:q�S¢l arpii,rpD �RBe'g ,_So. 00g. bn mte4�r9.a q y� x yd=� a. Ev agp�'s G.,.n^lan "iFK� wr_�s�9a�` .g 6-1 N , qgA4 N .n �•p" pr �^ T ^ryn NN17 S..n �i0 �.9 !t � •o: 6g a$ 11:n• �vua xai.� sy» � g is o' +•.Q=� 1�Q 1a ffi. gQ^�� C� r. G[r9r �K �r G �n� �+ G y V w at of e9.rr .wX 12 Nl�=y'R e$o�r ^ O M.' • �. $,..c Ea� as s4 .`a R. AIM n fig'r r Hai .^g «n Aga-�.� �y..w$��e ac + , r.w•+ ��r .n� n.�r� iy w pp� 2,••CA•V 4'.A7e M A• �•rdti. iG G. r= tOr g A Ix 1>< HE +Oab� If C;<yiPf� iq•��•'fi 4n`+r�G��N0�0 n��1rN0 �^.90 n eN .��.9e0pe..p+ jF"11 I6 �RS�0GSO�p~ �Fi_dC.r(Nf 6m r —01 hpjYOit C A� O4 1r3 UA1v.6 A wIN 1 6 A waA n m kin— pd d~ coup ''r Nd�. r��oo�•w�.. Sip+p��M�� (� cow pi �a�� ^A ai:�• �+e �',�.rN Ne• ,�w.? w dC ;��r r.= C� ;O. !f �ylS _ N M+ e•r7 O?`K6 � ID A. lod ls'ea.'^ A aH^ '�.N.� b =N. o•c^.gNn�•c..w=Ac ;h?rn. +�,R� ra7f '�a _r •,_ZI om ^ [1O + n a. Qm+lin+Wa m'ro.rooro pe�i'.� e��so.' Cps+^nN1.r..is •s 7 d'fnl 'g r�c�a C'� � �1 '�e cr.r. p°z W4oe r�+ « v w bur +e• a •�1 wC� t bd 7Q.+r ; Ab,n �Or rp O� w�^ � V G 0..�. �•_.;�• g�. ��.�o � �N«, <y�,'�w a���a�1ionaN. drs•`n� �o Q� 0 n`iA o fr:su � u?».='eb.�� -w.•. o $- eo �ry own®s =d ^:x $'n c «-- '..":."ri:kA n`n= Wis.; awai Lit ~vuA`�i1w ag; _ �� sae:eve �°. �� o.s Nn_ 'Iro y...�r. ;i-•� Nn w�.rZ iry +ir tr `sw r �.�" gR ww o Fil �:e lili.F I �n IA+G �e / .cn.. �m Rw w:ep bo"a�f+o r5'4 �es wPrZA �cq o Ycw r 1'A-i-F `s_e^n'o I+.r. ,Ql�w ..� N� ,O G 6 A~ w 6.R GMp Je a 3+:.nw3K •l w a QIo 1�{Is'o C b a;.L 1 °� o 7n� G^ w. oenN A � g� �or• NL w ��� nQ'Q A p��p �� gwin=N. a P**!a.a al" $ � P;o N g� ga oaR prig 4nNOyp�MA pppp. ,yT•"Q� r�.N.N mt n C.fgqOC en � rM N� K�.m w.�n.Pi � MQQ�q�f�.� I�:•' a.._a y.ri y� '• pAggY r � �`�•�• o;� Am���V 4 ■rD Y. tll� N w�A (1�.er :1 A M 9.M 9p�.ai c�_ �N� NgYO��, w�ib b+ a'Ia.�nwv 9p4�..{ ^rl l� �n ;le •�y.®,0� ��,.N. A N O G>t w. w h N !d 5� �R R n •r �6;P y.�.^ w; xo �^a n�e1� �I.w�c.Z e,� ti snp v np ore y n0 w�^ `�prpn �Q� �gC� �A � �M d�. ..• m.b pN o^' .w. Ytt•1+p.PG� G A' i�1w`. yyiu �b ICa DA a +T ,.;. •aA WR't1 G.�A IT.9 rx ( W { I (>C Ix 1 IT y mn9` RID r.iO.nb. f1N�. 'fNti �r^ry ND rN. ��oy�.y Vp�'Hii NGA ICS R•, bA� A'n�..A.. r✓.ORlab Pp b G•'�Q ny D.p.�C�n 1p�,V r13 O At �@+ w M' N7.g 1pw Qj�ar 1 1w aw a wo b'a+d. Ao' haver ,J- : s Pi.„ iD^ Ie was 1 w,ww: n. ^ wo wr.-sa k IqS t ±N(s�Sqs,w6�e•amCv_�g�Or��.. 71p^�^�a nppA��i.��r a641^a a� r°•��A.�Aoa�;'wN/c��ra.or.m?w N�{`, �pCn�oNim0.1 a Ais i vo 6oi kin � o�N•�t�1*Nrawr.< w o n r' wPi va i Npu>•��.-w N C w �P .n.�n N oOO j ^w V`T' O..a 1pl �`] O f~nC w •� �n n+w�?^�rellR at. •wG Nx G.�r.�+ �� ��..A '.� .� ^Y+N R6Ar r aq �^^n�p wSMnArpja� A Ri � 10 �' R D nC 4 vrrw r;�".P^r,6� ^w FP Z 1 .� 7 QAar n �ro,�» v'..o rcmv eve o.. roR ^. ro o^n:w wa® aaZ� cy ��olom wR �� or S?I '-.. 4yw ar �� s RR'a+. u'. _.w. lc ©m moo. or�cH iolewwaa�.. a� 4e N fl N 9yyy Y Yw�.�p�a O31R 39 �fl^ � � CI D �1`Al A r Pill C C`CAfi OG.� r.a A.9r.1 2IDj �.wi�rM � Y 1�191'O. On= o �. r 11.rt 1Pr.. !. ® �G N 3 Nyya�� :3K a 'O� `N ���ya o 3-i- 3 -p G M R Rk wN �N aw-� RyO, �.`rD��• N� 6 rY wy N-rt ..AWN I �rq Fh d�=�N ry E 'gg- �p�' 9� ® b p�Y~1 �pp �Uj S$Sa1 »�Q A *�M�P i B S; T. m 5 <� O,p ��C.•O: ;�J •f 4R��p. ^i n�r®0� \G• 30_»pw .MR ISO. C Obi.^.�. Oa V'J apiJ� • O.rt� a` r. � �7 � A' a N ? ��[OpA O' P, .p G t4 =dS w.qw 0 w Yam ; �M;■ Y9 TN � rafnr '. 3 ARnii M •A.• 9mr. nn i q .. M^Tb '.9rt0� ti;;�3 Y;; 3 p, q P $.9C qQ 3 � port • s `R'O ow aprr N Ob D. �^ M n ;+�� YN so '?• . rr �� ��0 .� Q-wb • O A:bM iCM ^ >rN r ±3 �pN M-�styp �a [ppR• t. a- -Sa ^q ^ppA n p�,O-prwww ry e� 3 oCp3 4 • � C 6 �SO r? �. •I± f) a �R0e q`�S a..My A�V� �■H Gp,3� >b> qw. O S w^^ Aw+r n a 6 'J •C`DI�G:. = C 1 IX 1 lx ix 4 5 Ix 4 • � a. u N C � v Of u� y +Y<vn3 yw aTe�.yy H-EU 9 nq�pno� r v y.�,pno li' S. oneaS C q an p.i 9'A.w�<r.3 ppRnA 1 1 Qm�NCI Aaz rtins ;rp ^ .A. �.N■■■`i� y. rbaN�» Ate•V r C�Q. $BOgBq..&nY9 C'ova MM^ A.tl v VA -,may. SO.wif> nw giil N rt-..r R'N • �W��� 9 R'�w n �'^ a a.sr' v . rt a fairn.: D.��t rtD pnp �wN oO■>r n 96w m•cMrO }n� S rtOrtb�_•. R'S� «� �.rwr� mcmg' pig � »'. AnwnQ. .,t�r•oa a.1pT- M., ng.s.0:r n� c r.ow• ;p ^scq R = 8 . �i° rtA _.ro »NN .iirtnY. -W m N. N a Lv ar �rt6 ^. O »a 'a.. rs a ". vRai f �G QQ H n.�.� q qo'�i C1�u E r=.n.N e, �,Q C 1, Sa^? t -awe �^ vs«t��n�. gym' $ a^ZC eo• � '.� ".;^ : g n OAA ! ..c .» r o A M�w� g ��• €g�� N�} ^gin�. • - . GG _ • - � 4�■ �R ter. - R' o • 3 O-A ,p-r �y' toT Snq prt• la. 10 Gt p•w-w N I 1 0 1 ' •Y w M 9 ?" �fy9 O G �I� .Him GQ).. �C !71'11.1 �pa ^�+ f1 W C .�pr N w f1a pS•�.a pA q.b. W40 o�ia•.� +w WAaa Cn Qr p` A .+9�! OOPir pip T3 �pa$sw.. may,';, p:X�•^p ._i. ma's i9+_bn + oo�J ffi. 9�ti� t �� gpW ® Or b off ` Y�raa gr� ��ni el Qgnw Y� mw « M. 3a •�;°nN ��. .'be 4` g� goi riv- gar s ' s sr _J "9e +e-MA,, 14�n'veiw �. as pn �nc g a �a®�i �a 3� ,we. n.N. N .21' �Q... 66=w; n �� CM. {o� srss %p-= a 1 .9 Nl► a gals!. g ® ` nrto A� QQ+ "y07 go a. �r ® r. Ma . S C w i S ®.. S OR O O C tlZ 1ry..3 ,o an 4 an og w � l C,O M.6n eGi. �, Ola uNIo tap + 9 m'�+4 0 O "fpns P q s; �Q p r\ �'..A07 .0 6WO:'7.YJ tl, W. m9 Ap fxf q 4g .G. in :°ga'e rR.. vp 3p�nr� "a 6-+ o h...$ o. am =•� eiO i3'i es�u.�: ii r N —a. . �6 gmM0 'w cti, o�.o�.w •.,7C v. c rro'.. N c � �Q o.m.c �n w.� �� S•,:a� '. �7'Lgw N�" <s si Sor,w ,in _4 i Aa a Z!A M'O! bAlO-.N ENO t�►y~i'� DD� +4i� ranC tr0 s..�n _ F El c tN tr f,v ip b ro r't.. N C �y[. /� A r N R" 8 H(■y n `roiK i 7 A{�n Swa pa +`? gi yam. .q � O r` N6 via p� I�R/1.9 C�$ <Q�. �Q p.nA r■p I� ^Y A I•N a STA gg fl Q Rj96- ron xx '^o'er o. & r" a $. wNc 7� .a tar 112 UI w ry= a N N ro A A STIC -FIE 8 ws���• w� �. o v �c YS" mro Rs sa �a ro^�c N ron za �. nv •c Nro xv s I a u n� b N p •� sa o.. �o m. v a 6'row =! 0 3 H t a a N, 3 nQ: a 5 A 9 A �~p ^�v ro a.Y ro .0 IN— lz mow. t,Y'.Z Nn ,rN•,)v S^ Al 3 p3, S ,Z ego .r..,p r:�t v° roi Y At a r �iM gg= orb ^R Napa ■a .ci..n1z ... n� no 1^a D< {ro�ro n eNio yyCrow.R A~ ron � ,;.Y —ll ZZ C�. gpt D � aS?��O P. new �; ;fin` p +dn MAg g b.O I Op qR�S + rA On pwq .+wA Op'»1 9ff ipyp �p.�1Opr i■ i.N�r M A`� n b IC 7 H M1�O n"gg" ^a p nN n If p $� 7 r;ZZ �Q I� a~Ka _.7at $n � +� M�.xr N npn�0 0 D Y �. N pp pqq 9"s 'G.S.p O !S at Es «a�� THE �$m6is 0 A Rw� r.0 b 'gyp nSw f' AM +s 00 Rw■M■ FAO b .pG®. `"'n !! C.No®N Ira r ® qp + A9RiY AN.O w� r7 w3$q Na� n S Ap � I MUn TM'c N O , C Z�. B'6 Sr0 '� qf�J�a qb YN 6 Of01 �e� N v n .l�D � 9 �, p tiM A b 6 M�N� M O• rp ��. e�^�Q Q a' w • P00 Q, ,ebio n n yiT�. '@r. i W far R9; 8 O. N n..nc Vie. Mho m a b a Ll Nor •aNp wQ0 S� r• RESOLUTION NO. .89-26A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 1405,,5, 770 DEVEL07HENT OF '115, UNITS ON 10.27 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE),, LOCATED NORTH OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND EAST OF BAKER AVENUEi AND MAILING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-201-32 AND 12. A. Recitals. C\ (i) On February 8, 1989, the Planning' Commission adopted .its �l Resolution No. 89-26, approving Tentative Tract 14055, a one-lot subdivision �f for condominium purposes, consisting of 115 units. (ii) On September 13, 1990, a modific,�tion request was filed by Modern Corporation to change the map frcm a one-lot subdivision to a three-lot subdivision for financing purposes. (iii) On December 12, 1990, and continued to February 13, March 13, and March 27, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on March 27, 1991, (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. A. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and rasolvEd by the Planning Commission of the City o! Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby i3pecifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resc'c;tion are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to thi__.'Commission during the above-referenced public hearings including written at #ral staff reports, togetb-_ with public testimony, this Commission"hereby a_ecifically ' finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located north of Arrow Highway and east of Baker Avenuewith a street frontage of 132 feet along Arrow Highway and 198 feet along Baker Avenue and is presently vacant, except for two unimproved dirt roads; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is is the Low-Medium Residential District and is developed with a mobile home par;., the property to the south of the site consists of older single family res!,'ences in the Medium Residential District, the property to the east is vacant with a F PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89-26A TT 14055 MODERN CORPORATION March .27, 1991 Page 2 designation of Medium Residential, and the property to the went is Baker Avenue, with single family residences beyond in the Medium Residential District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commisdica during the above-refereef;ed public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby,finds and concludes as follows; (a) The Tentative Tract ie consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code; and (b) The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract, are consistent with the General`Plan.and the Development Code; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type ,-�f development proposed;. and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humane and wildlife_ or their habitat; and (e) The. Tentative Tract is not likely to cause oerious public health problems; and (f) The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies"that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, that a Negative-Meclaration was issued on February 9, 1989. S. Based upon the findings and 4 ;, lusiona seat forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 abt`re, this Commission hr:reby modifies the application subject to each and every condition set forth"below and incorporated herein by this reference. I planning-,niv s o 1) All Conditions of Approval as contained in Resolution No. 89-26 shall w except as may be modified herein.- 2) Each phase' shall maintain two points of access. The loop driveway shall be completely Constructed with Phase i.. �ey,s PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 69-26A TT 2405S - MODERN CORPORATION March 27, 1991 Page 3 3) Construction shall be in accordance with the phasilg plan. In particular, the main (westerly) recreation area and pool shall be const5iucted with Phase L 4) Automatic sliding gates shall be installed at the two access points into the mobile home park and gate keys, cards, or some other appropriate device hall be isried to the residents of the Mobile Hobe Park,,jnly. T�is shall be completed with Phase`l. 5) Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever- comes first, the ,applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the estan) shment of a Mello- Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide, in conjunction with the applicable School District, for the )l construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any School :district has previously established such... a Community Facilities District, W/ a9plicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of suci existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected Scuaol District,has not formed a Mel;o-Roos Community Eacill--ies District within 12 months of the date of approval of the time exten.uion and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. Further, should the District and the developer reach an agreement, prior to recordation of the map, this :condition shall be deemed null and void. Enoineer4.nn 1) A reciprcal easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to recordation of the Final Map''ia favor of the properties to the west on Arrow Route. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89-26A qj TT 140SS - MODERN CORPORATION March 27, 1991 Page 4 i; 2) if the project is constructed in phases, the first phase shall construct: a) the drive aisle connecting from Baker Avenue to. Arrow' Route to provide two means of access; b) the drive aisle connecting to the two accoss points: into the mobile home pan„k; and .g) the automatic sliding gates for the two access points into the mobile home park. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify tt� the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH'DAY OF MARCH 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Laxry T. McNiel, Chairman I ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary i, Brad Bul..;Z , Se bretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of March 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERSt , NOS'# COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i R y% RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14055, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF =APN: 207-201-32 and 12. A. Recitals (i) Modern Corporation has filed an application for the extension of Tentative Tract No. 140SS as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension Xequest is referred to as "the application." (ii) on February S, 1989, this Commission adopted its Resolution 11o. 89-26, thersby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Tract No. 14055. (III) On January 7, 1991, the applicant filed a request for a 12-month Time Extension. (iv) on December 12, 1990, and continued to February 13 and March 27, 1591, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on March 27, 1991. tit, (i) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, 1,t is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planaing Commission, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: li 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set fort.: in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. - 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, during the above-referenced public hearing including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial compliance with the City•s current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and Policies, and (b) The extension of the Tentative Map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and Pclieiesj and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 140SS March 27, 1991 : Page 2 (c) The eutersion of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause pyplic health and safety problems; and (d) The extension is within the time limits-prescribed by ;state low and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, thia Commission hereby grants a Time Extension subject to each and every condition set forth below: (1) All Conditions of Approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No.'89-26 shall apply. (2) Approval shal. . expire an February a, 1442, unless extended by the Planning Commission. . 1 (3) Prior to the recordation of'`Oe final map or the issuance of building per mite, whichever comes first, the applicant shall 1,cnsunt to, or participate in, the establishment of,a Mello- Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the projea't site to provide, in conjunction with the applicable School District, for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any School District NCil previously er'cablished such a Community Facilities Distract, the applicant ` shall, in the alternative, consent Co the annexation of the project site into the territory of suoh existing District prior to the recordation of the .final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected School District has I not formed a Mello-Abos Community Facilities District within 12 months of the date of approval of the Time Extension and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance ?f building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. C 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall, certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESCLUTrON NO. TIME EXTENSION FOR TT'14055 March 27, 1991 Page, 3 �1 APPROVED AND ADOPTED TH?S 27TH DAY OF MARCH 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman` ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary 1 I,"`Brad Buller, Secretary,of the Planning Commission of the City o. -Igancho Ce�:amonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dnly and regularly introduced, pass ed,_and adopted by the Planning%Commission, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day. of March 1991, by the following vote-to-watt AYES: COMMISSIONERS;: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: , ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: j i I s'. r _( CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �o�vC�Anao.yc9 . T' ME1V GRAl*nDUli � � r C O a F��.I Z DATE. March 27; .1991 _ TO.-' Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Bra: Buller„ City Plolmner BY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner SUBJECT: Hav',ing Element Amended Pages Since the last reeting,: staff ine;- with Commit Jbner Melcher and discussed, his questions and concerns regarding ;the draft Housing Element. Staff concurred with man} of h13 suggestions which act to clarify the draft language and wo h�L.ve inclu3.d them in the attached amended blue pages for insertion in your copies of the element. Deletions are indicated with everstrikes and addit ons are underlined. Staff r:commends that the Planning Commission favorably consider these minor alterations when making its recommendation to the City Council. BB:LH:ds Attachments i i I L _ The percent of., a household''s income spent on hcusing costs can be aANk significant social indicator. The federal Department of Housing and Urban Devr; opment has established as a guideline that 'not .fore than .30 percent of the .monthly gross income should go for paying housing costs. Estimates providea by SCAO7 in the "Revised Regional Housing Needs Assessment" of December, 1938, indicate that there are 5,879 lower, income households in Rancho Cucamonga of which 3,069 are paying more than 30. percent of their income for shelter. IV, HOUSING DEMAND The major factor that will affect the demand for housing in the City is the tr expected employment growth in the commercial and industrial sectors, `During the next 20 to.;30 years;*he industrial and commercial areas in the City will generate a demand for approximately 50,378- new housip`i units in the region as ' s,iown in Table I1I-4. It is the City's desire to provide suitable and affordably priced housing,in. order to allow as many locally generated employees employed persons as possible to reside in the City, which is,otherwise referred to as the capture rate. Assuming a capture rate that will range from 11.7 percent (currently existinl up to 30 percent (the City's goal) off, locally generated employees, this will rasult in a housing unit allocation at build-out;:for between 5,894 ' and 15,113 units respectively. DRAB f` f'OR $)iSCUSSION p ,jPOSF-S ONLY ,y �prt. DRAFT roR DISCUSSION PURPOSES OiNls_Y TABLE III.4 PROJECTED COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL HOUSEHOLD GENERATION AT BUILD-OUT industrial R&D Manufacturing Waaroflousing 0111ea RetalUcommeretai Total Undeveloped Acreage* 1,2is 1,056 1,056 211 ter` 4113 'Floor AreaRatlo 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.25 0.25 Smiling Square FooC 21,240 16,400 18,400 Z298 6,218 66,555 Sq.Ft.Per Employee 700- i,000 2,700 350 500 EmpioynientCa Build-out '30,340 18.400 6,810 6,570 IZ440 74,560 Prolwed Employees par Household 1.48 Paojeotad Additional Households 50,378 •Sased on vacant acreage as of August,1987 horn Table pIa of the Ckys Masser Environmental Assessment. General Plan Land Use calegoaies redefined as follows:general,community,neighborhood and regional commercial=r*W commercial:Industrial Park=R S 0;general and heavy industrial=manufacturing arrd warehouse. Source:from Table Ill-and Table 111-6 of the Draft Affordable Housing Strateg;prepared by Wi iams-Kuebelbeck 6 Associates It is the City's goal to increase the capture rate to the extent possible in order to affect an improved jobs/housing balance in the City as, well as i'n thn region as a whole. An 'improved Sobs/housing balance (a shift of new jobs to housing rich areas and of now housing to Job-rich areas) will help reduce further congestion and help improve air quality, in the region. Based upon SCAC's recent Draft City Projections of March, 1990, and City estimates, Rancho Cucamonga will eventually be job rich as the existing jobs/housing balance of 1.00 is projected 410 increase to approximately 1.80 at build-out. It is clear then, that the, subregional jobs/housing ratio will be improved by way of increased employment growth in Rancho Cucamonga. t , w 10 r , I--3� ' E ; ,.t TABLE 111-5 CONTINUED PROJECTED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY PLANNING AREA VICTORIA Vacant Uncommitted Units at 500/6 Units at 75%' Lan Langj Use AQMM Density Ranee bdusl Rano J LM (4-8du/ac) 59.00 354 413 M (8-14du/ac) 189.98 2090 2375 MH(1 4-24du/ac) 24.95 474 536 H (24-30du/ac) 14.21 384 405 Totals 288.14 3302 . 3729 ; ANNEXED LAND a HR (.1-2du/ac) 0 0 0 VL (.1-2du/ac) 165.40 164 246 L (2-4du/ac) it 0 0 LM (4-8du/ac) Q 0 0 Totals 165.40 16A 246- TOTALS 2533.74 13,261 `"15,493 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY t r�4 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Lands suitable for affordable housing have also been identified by the City and are further discussed in the Technical Appendix. Within the two planned f communities of Terra Vista and Victoria, a commitment has beee was made, as a fresult of original conditions of approval and Development Agreement, whereby L' up to 15 percent of the: total number of units will be made economically Cf available to families of low and moderate incomes. The total nurben_r,,of I� affordable rental or ownership dwelling units that can be ,provided by these two projects is 2,141 units: VI, HOUSING AVAILABILITY The most prominent type of residential construction in the City for the last eleven years has been single family, both detached, and attached. Approximately 71 percent of all units constructed were of this type with- about 29 percent being multiple family,unit types. Based upon the existing' vacant residential land in the City, in the coming years a majority, or 59 percent of the new housing stock will be of a multifamily nature, which is defined as P� densities of 8 dwelling units per acre or greater,, including condominiums, townhomes, and apartments. These figures indicate thA,,t the City's growth is following a standard pattern ofresidential development i:n expanding urban areas. That is, the predominance'of single family development occurs early in A community's development to be followed by multi-family type infill. The two ' planned communities of Terra Vista and ,Victoria will play a significant role in the ilfuture housing availability in the City. A:; of December'1989, both planned commnities had a total of 460 acres of vacant uncommitted residentt:?l property. Of that total acreage, 73 percent (337 acres) permits a density range of 4-14 dwelling units per acre while the j' remaining 26 percent ( 23 acres) will allow between 14 to 30 dwelling units per acre. As of December 1989, project applications for 332 units in the 4-14 range ,snd 1,439 units in the 14 to 30 density range had been submitted for review within the two planner' communities. 1 14 i \\ Y Additionally, various programs available to allow the provision of affordable housing, including a Condominium Conversion Ordinance, Density Bonus Provisions, Mortgan2 Revenue Bond Programs, and Redevelopment,- Agency incentives are discussed in detail in Chapter 3. VII. HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS'\, According to the Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) 1988 Regional Housing Needs Assessment"',(RHNA), Rancho Cucamonga was estimated to have 3,069 lower income households'`who were paying more than 30 percent of their income on housing. The P,HNA also provides projections for the City as to the number of units that will be needed by 1994 in order to avoid a housing impaction. According to SLAG, approximately 93446 9,568 additional housing units will be needed by 1994 i•fi order to minimize any housing constraints and provide adequate housing to persons wishing to locate in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Of this total number of households, 2-j345 2,375 are estimated to be very low and low income and I3797 '1,729 are estimated to be moderate'income. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared, as part of its Community Development Block Grant Program (CDOG),. a Housing Assistance Plan (HAP).. The HAP identifies the housing needs of various special groups, minority households, and also identifies the breakdowns between owner/renter household and lower income_households versus all households needing assistance. In the plan, lower income small families were cited as being the largest household group needing assistance. As of April 1989, the HAP;identified 1,4:19� lower income small families, 3F,3 lower income large famil,es' and 174 loW-A income elderly families needing housing assistance. In addition to those households identified in the RHNA and )-'Api , the City has provided an assessment of the various identified special 'needs 'populations, including minority households, the disabled, senior citi?%ns, single heads of households, and the homeless which are further discussed in Chapter 3. ®RAC- FOR 01SGUSSKOAl PURPOSES ONLY { 15 r. FOR D1SCUSs10 I PURPC)-,r_'-S J'-;l_Y Of these,3pecial need groups, the number of homeless are probably the most difficult to:determine. Based upon a survey of local law and code enforcement agencies, social service offices as well as local churches and informed citizenry conducted in January 1990, the Fi;anning Division has Idetermined that there are approximately 25 persons or less on an average daiiy"hasis in need of shelter. The City's Development Code., currently does not include designations which specifically allow the development of shelter facilities, although it is possible that existing definitions in the CodeJor Group Care Facilities and Rcesidential Care Facilities may be interpreted for this use. As a result, the City should evaluate existing Code definitions a«d requirements to determine those c��ditions and standards wher:S types of ' shelter facilities can be located, including review and evaluation of industrial distric,;s. It is the overall identified need of low and very low income houseA olds and special needs populations that the majority of thn Housing Element progrcros are tar9eted for in the provision of direct monetary assistance, rehabilitation programs, or the encouragement of affordably priced housing. AM VIII. ENERGY CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES Me State of Californii established basic 'energy efficiency standards for residential structures in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code which became effective in June of 1983. These energy specifications require both active and passive energy features for all residential developments. In addition to the state requirements, the City has also included, as part of the Development Code, passive and active soiar energy requirements. IX. EXISTING HOUSING COMMONS Overall, the housing stock of the City is in good condition. Approximately one percent of the total dwelling units in' 1980 had no plumbing or heating according to the Federal Census. This is probably attributable to the fact that all but 2,250` iwelling units have been constructed since 1960. Am 16 DRAF-i Fol? DISC USS10"IJ Pf ni-c^3!E . .:, . , AML Program 2,B,2: Continue to operate a repair grant program for seniors i, and disabled or handicapped persons for minor housing t, needs by providing' grants of up, to $5,000o tower income owner occupants of single family residences including mobile homes. Target: 60 households, approximately 15 on an annual basis. Rt;ponsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Community Development-..',Block Grant, approximately $20,000 annually Schedule::% 1990-1994 Program 2.B.3: ,, Operate a housing rQhabilitation and repair loan- program that offers both deferred loan payments and low interest loans to dower income households, excluding mobile homes. Target: Citywide approximately 24 low income' households , households ear Responsible Agency. City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Community Development Block 'Grant, approximately ±$80,000 annually Schedule: 1990-1994 POLICY 2.C: In order to improve living environments and prevent neighborhood deterioration, the City shall promote efforts to ensure that all' ghborhoods of the City, including older, deteriorating ones have adequate E public/community facilities and services. Program 2.C.1: Continue to provide public improvements/community facilities su�-ti as street improvements, street lights, c ' sidewalks, parkway landscaping as well as park G facilities in qualified target areas. 23 Target: Citywide target areas as identified. Responsible Agency: City of Ranch& Cucamonga, Piann'irg & Engineering Divisions , nancing: Community Development`_ Block Grant, approximately +$200,000 annually Schedule: On-going _ POLICY 2.D: The City should promote the maintenance of existing sound quality housing. Program 2.0.2: Utilize concentrated ^Code Enforcement programs to 4 target speciVc areas or problems when the need' and �? ! community support warrant such activity. Target: Citywide Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division, Code ` Enforcement Section Financing: General Fund, City Budg'l Schedule: On-going j I Program 2.D.2: Develop an mandatefy outreach referral program wher:Fby owners of properties identified` through Code Enforcement ;Activities which may have structural_ or maintenance�,I,r"oblems shall be dirf_,ted to contaci, the CDBG coordinator. e.;y 't. Target Citywi'ae Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: 1992-93 DRAB FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 24 L FZA FT -" FOR DISCUSSiON ,PUFZPOSES ONLY r _:Program S.A.6: Continue to support the use of a vpluntary rent stabilization; known as the Mobile HO*e Park Accord, for mobile home parks past the current expiration date Of December 31, 1991, as a1Mea.-vz,of keeping rents:at reasonable levels to allow con}iN ed affordability of Ws method of housing. if Target: Exis:llng mobile home parks Responsible,Agency: City Uf' Rancho Cucamonga, City Admin;strator' t; Office Financing__.' General �!nd, City Budget Schedule: 0n-going - C "rogran S.A.7: Develop and implement an Afkrdab'le housing strategy utilizing the., Redevelopment 20'.-ercent tax increment " j fund that is consistent with provisions of the Western Center for Law & Poverty Agreement. Target Lower and moderate income households in the followin.1 ranges: 1,518 to 3,036 units based on development l costs for a 2 bedroom apartment and between 1,377 to 2,079 'uni-ts, based on a single: family detached home pr• ce of $150,000 Responsible Agency: Redevelopment Agency Financing: 2i percent tax increment funding Schedule: .1990-2000 POLYC1t 5.6: To promote efforts to better define both the size and composition of the homeless population in order to more accurately assess existing and future needs. c, 33 Program 5.8.1c The City shall monitor on an annual basis -"'e number of persons in need of shelter in Rencho Cucamonga on an average daily basis as well as the number and type of shelter services available at that time. Target: Identifica;°tion of the homeless population_ Responsible Agen y: City of }ancha Cucamonga, Plapning Division Financing General Fund, City Budget Schedule: 1990-94 POLICY 5.C: Provide for and facilitate the provi�. on of temporary emergency shelter and tra.nsitiona.l housing opportunities. Program 5.C.I: Provide financial support toward development of a transitionft!-housing program. At a minimum, this program should involve direct subsidies in the. Form of grants and/or loans to be used toward housing entry costs, including first and last months re: i and security deposit. An expanded program would involve the longer term provision, of shelter in combination with job training, and money management_,_,and medical mental 'health zubstan g abuse counseling. Target: Identified homeless populations Responsible Agency: Redevelopment Agcncy Financing: 20 peren.t tax increment fund Schedule 1992 s € Program S.C.2: Encourage the continued provision of emergi-.ncy shelter i i assistance to persons lacking shelter by loci?, organizations, community groups, and churches; . tile: City `shall provide assistance to these groups if d" reggested. DRAFT 34 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES 0Aby _ 'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , STAFF REPORT DATE: March 27, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner j BY: Larry Henderson, Printipal Planner SUBJECT: L14VIRONIIENTAL ASSfiSSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT l REVISION 90^-03A - CITY, OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA. - In accordance . with Articl4 10.6, Section 65588 of the California Government Code, a revision and update to the City Housing Element has been prepared. The changes to the, document include: an update of the Technical. Appendix consisting of documentation and analysis of current demographic trends, statistical information, and ho',Ising assistance needs, update and - revisions to the Cty's.,housing objectives and polieiesr and development of a five ,,year action program designed to implement the City's overall. housing goal. Ir_ addition, staff recommends issuance of a-,%�gative Declaration. (Continued from February 27, 1991,) _ 'ti 1 I. BACKGROUND: This item was continued, as an open public nearing, from the February 27, and March 13,.-1991, meetings to provide the Planning Commission additional tii.i to review i*he extensive revisions to the Housing'Elemerea. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that after considering information contained in the oral and written star; 'reperts and after hearing public testimony, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of the General Plan Housing Element Revision 90-03A to the City Council. Res f y s ed, Br Ci Planne BB:LH:sp a XMI C RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C0.IMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. OF GENERAL. PLAN AMENDMENT 90-03A, TO RnVISF AND UPDATE THE HOUSING ELEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 10.6 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, AND ISSUANCE Or A NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AND MAKING FINDINGS IIl SUPPORT THEREOF A. Rec tale. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filsd an application for General Plan Amendment No. Qq-03A as descri5ed in the title of this 2esolution. Hereint{ter in. this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On February 27, and cont';nued to March 13, and March 27, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of' Ranchz� Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application. (III) All legal Yrerequ iites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is %ere`)y found, detarmined, ar.d resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rsncho Cuci conga as follows,, 1. This Ccmmission hereby specifically finds tiiat fill of the facts set fort),. in the Recitale, Part. A, of this Resolution '1re ::rue and cor.ract. 2. Based upon substantial evidenctl, presentee' o this Commission duringthe above-referenced public hearings .:..`rebrtary 27, March 13, and March 27, 1991, including written and oral stiff reporyuy tzgether with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically fj-da a,; folloWor (a) The Proposed revision and amendment of the Housing Element will not have a significant impact on the env11==' ent as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study Pare L[; and (b) The proposed Housing Element Amendment is in substantial conformance with the ?rovisions of Article 10.6 of the California Government Code as evidenced by the revisions made to the document at the reruest of the State Department of Housing and Community Development; and (c) The proposed Horteing Element is ronpistent with the other elements of the General Plen as provided through the organization and construction of the .general Plan into super elements in which the goal, ryjectives, and policies contained in these elements arse interrelated and 11 dependent upon one another, any as a result of the rec,rt tecl}nical update to the General Plan adopted January 4, 1913'; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 27, 1991 Page 2 ARk (d) The proposed amendment furthers the attainment o' 'the City•e overall sousing goal thrr,agh the development and implementation of the five-year action program and quan_3iisa objectives which" promote the preservation,. maintenance, and development of housing opportunities for all economic segments i;f the community. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commise£on during the above-referenced purtic hearings and upon:'thta,specific findings of facts set ;orth in paragraphs land 2 hf`ove, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed Housing Element Amendment a in --onformance with the General Plan. (b) That the Sao osee.Housin Element Amendment will not have " p g significant impacts on the environme,: ,c) That the proposed Housing 21w1ment Amendment is in substantial compliance with the,provisionp-nf Article 10.6 of the California Government Code. 4. (a) The Planning Commission apecif+sally finds and determines that, a Negative Declaration for this--grojecr has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended and the guidelines promulq) ted thereunder,. .and, further, tars Commission finds and deterwine,3 that, based upon the findings stet kcrth in Sections 1, 2, and s, that no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. (b) The Planning Commission finds that the fasts supporting the- above-specifier! findings are contained in the Megativ* Declaration, the Staff Report and exhibits; and the information pxbv_dpd to this Commission during y the public hearings; and, therefore, this Commission hereby zscommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragrapha 1, 2, 3; and 4 above, r.his Commission hereby resolvea that pursuant to Section 658SO tv 65855 of the California Government Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby rec--mends approval on the 27th day of March 1991 of General Flan Amendment No. 90-03A. 6. Tha Secretary to this Commission shawl certify to the adoption of this Resolution. f ' APPROVED FIND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DRY OF MARCH 1991. Pi.1NNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY uF :Rhr;CHO CUCAMOPtGA BY. Larry. T. McN16 , Chairman C-3 P1j1):+SNv COHRISSION RASOLUTION NO, GPA 90-01A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 3 ATTEST: Brad Bailer. Secretary, j s 1, Brad Buller-, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City Of Rancho " Cacamcnga. .do hereby certify that the foregoing, Raatiution was. duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the lann£ng Comiesion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regclar meeting of the Planning Commaisaion held on the 27th day of. Mar..ch 1991, by the following vote-to-wit:' _ STYES COMJ%,_SSIOHERS: ..OES: COMISSmMRS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO W-23AMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE March 27, 1991 TO: Chairman and Me►bprs�of the Planning Comission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Sersior Civil rnylneer BY: Betty A. Miller, AssociateEngineer SUBJKT; EAVIRONMENTAL ASSESSM!?NT'AND TENTATIVE PARCEL W 13693 LUNA A sub�i�s o"�n"'�o Nacre n an o pa'ce s n e ery Low Residential District ,(less than 2 dv"elling units per acre), located on the north side 'of Northridge Drive, west of Haven Avankie APN: 201-182-29. Related file: Variance 91-04. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIN: j k. Action Re uesteti: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel asap as shown on Ex "B° and issuance of a Negativs Declaraticn. ! , B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 23,330 sq. ft. Parcel 2 - 22 500 .sq. ft. Total sq. ft. t0.99 ac) f C. Existing Zoning: Very Low Residential D. Surrounding Land Use: North - East half V=Wt; west has two single family residences and z third, under construction South Single Family kesidential ; East - Vacant; West - Harse ,Corral E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - V-!,ry Low Residential South - Low-Medium Residential East ''- Very Low Residential West - Very 'Loa Residential F. Site Characteristics: This site is Vacant ani sloprS to the south at . per ent. sere Is an existing wrought iron Vence along the south project boundary on the north side of Northridge Driva. I IMI n I PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPOPT TENT PM 13693.- LUNA M!!RCH 27, 1991 PAGE 2 II-. ANALYSIS: The our-pose of this parcel map is to subdivide a one acre parcel into two �l half acre parcels consistent with the Very Low Residentfai District ,vsignation. -Staff initially recommended that -both lots front onto iorthridge Drive, because it was felt that the fronts of houses would ,present a more aesthetic stt =.etscape�¢or the homes to the south than ' wouf d a rear yard wall I . There was also some concern about the masti4r planning implications for vacant parcels to the north and east of the project site. Staff recommended that the applicant hold a neighborhood mLeting on the tee%tative parcel map; since.,Parcel Map 5996 in this vicinity had generated significant neighborhood interest. Residents of the development on the south side of Northridgf' )rive have made it clear, both during the -_ighborhood meeting and i�;subsequent .tonnunications directed t(. taff, that they object to lots fronting on'the north side of Northridge Drive. Resj)ecting the neighbor's wishes, the applicant is now proposing to access both 'parcels off a single drive approach on rabrosa Place, with a 20-foot wide access easement along the north property line of parcel 1 in favor of parcel 2. Both access configurations, using Cabrosa'Piace-Versus Northridge Drive, were presented to the Trails Committee to determine what the local equestrian trail requirements would be under the two optional master plans. The applicable recommendations have been included in the conditions of approva'i. A Fire Protection District representative has al so reviewed fhe proposed map and suggest«;! condition of approval allowing them t review the access to parcel .?_ Pon development. A. Piaster Planning: Three large vacant parcels remain.,north_and east of the project siti. The City's access policy for arterial. streets .will allow one additional intersection on Wilson Avenue between Mayberry and Haven Avenue:;. Exhibit "C" illustratns how this area might be developed if the conceptof no access to Nort!lWge:nrive is also applied to the balance of the vacant property. Exhibit "0" shows huw the same area coul d be devel oped i f up to 5 1 ots were al 1 owc; to front onto Northridge Drive. The issues are as follows: 1. In both alternatives, all of the master planned cul-de-sacs exceed 600 feet in length. In Exhibit "C", three cul-de-sacs (21 lots) will utilize a single access point on Wilson, AvcnAte. In Exhibit "D", two cot-de-sacs (18 lots) will do so. The Mre Protection District has not a pressed -concern with either alternative,. since all new hone construction requires sprinklers. The difference between 18 and 21 lots , s nominal . PLANN19b COMMISSION STAFF Ktt,IRT TENT P14 13693 LUNA � MARCH 27, 1991 PAGE 3 2. Exhibit ,'D" does allow the local equestrian trail system to be "anterior 10 the VL district rather than on the perimeter, adjacent ,;o Northridge Drive. 3. A detail was provided, on the Conceptual Graditi- Plan it Exhibit "E") of a north-south section (Exhibit "F" takenlithrough parcel 1 and Northridge Drive, to i l usti.to the ;relative position of houses, streets, traits, and slopes. - Nilte that sides of houses will be visible from the south ';;ide of Northridge Drive in the proposed configuration, unli�ss' the height of the perimeter wall is increased. Under the 4'Aterna`te master plan, that view would be of front yards. 4. If access to parcel 2 is taken from Cabrosa Place, that driveway w'11 be more than 200 feet long. The Fire Protection District will need a way for its vehicles to turn around or have an alternate exit role available. B. Neighborhood Concerns: A neighborhood meeting was held on December 18, 1990, Attendees included residents of Northwood Vistas, a Lour-Medium Residential AM development (4-8 dwelling units per acre) immediately south of the project site, and the owners of a vacant parcel east of the project site. The residents of Northwood Vistas objected to fronting either parcel onto Northridge Drive for thr?e reasons: 1. The larger lots on the north side of Northridge. Drive can accommodate equestrian uses. :Use of the neighborhood streets by barge. vehicl es, such as horse trail ers woul d confl ict`,with the homeowners'association prohibition against recreational' vehftle storage, 2. The homeowners`association currently maintains the parkway slope on the north side of Northridge Drive; Residents object to driveways disrupting the existing slope landscaping and perimeter fencing. 3. The residents perceive Northwonds Villas as a close-knit community and feel that the VL lots proposed would be uncharacteristic of that community. They would noi, anticipate the acceptance of thos�o lots into the homeowners°association, if such a request were made. Subsequent to the neighborhood meeting, the City has received 133 signed form letters (Exhibit "G°) from members of the Northwood Homenwners° Association, objecting to any plans to construct driveways or streets leading into the community from Northridge ,. Drive. Thr:;y feel this would compromise their privacy,and security. Y PLANNING COMMISSIW STAFF REPORT TENT PM 13693 - LUNA MARCH 27, 1991 PAGE 4 C. Trails Advisory Committees The Committee reviewed the project on February 20, 1991, and recommended the following trail requirements: 1. If the proposed access configuration is used (access from fabrosa Place), a 15-fool- wide local feeder trail should be provided along the Entire soutterly boundary of Parcels 1 and 2, and a 10-foot wide local fer:der train should be provided alont the east side of Parcel 2. 2. If the alternate "s used (access from Northridge -Drive), a Is- foot wide local, feeder trail should be provided along the entire northerly boundary of Parcels i and 2. A III. CONCLUSION: The proposed subdivision is compatible with adjacent property on the Forth side of •Northridge Drive and the related master plan (Exhibit ""3;, although not optimal, is workable. Staff ,has res,:rvations abou� providing access to Cabrosa Place for parcel 2 across par:el 1, but given the concerns of the existing residents on Northridge Drive, believes the applicant has offered a viable solution. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW; The applicant_complated Part I of the Initial au y. Staff conducted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefare, issuance of Negative Declaration Is appropriate. V. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surroundi;rg property owners and placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Posting at the site has also P2en_completed. VI. RECOMMENDATION: it is recornended` that the Planning Cormissior consider a�nput an3relaments of the Tentative Parcel Map 13693. if after $.acts consideration, the Commission can recommend ay)proval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate.. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer B RH:BAM:dl w Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") Tentative Map (Exhibit "B") Area piaster Plan (Exhibit "C") �ltern tP st - P' tE hip t "D oncep ue Gradefing'Warl ExFi bit " ") North-South Section (Exhibit "F") Samplo Homeowner Letter (Exhibit "G")_ Resolution and Recommended Conditiols of Approval T III �_ ��: �' ��■y���� �■.■ .■,! ow III .� �■■ ��t®�r� � r■■■ � MIL WA MINI MIN MINIMUM!! III MINIMUM ��ark!/Initlturlunmu�`•+.i11■ ynuT I�I ters w���r r■a� ■ n►` ��1lnlrr�tllu�l ' � a tea �► 111/•Li 6i1 r■1 lul 1�:®,� � a ra a�`t� I[itl-J►1111 1 � � �,►►f��i�m r. n►n �� // nrlq Iu►+ �aoununr►+Ili • =111II1111►�, `..peg r .►►....■.+........ eCC r11rr14rUrglllt ■■■ � �`����� Me aril z� �■ ��i - IIr11111r11/rrrr rl rg e 11I1III� /� !!!lartuul122 511 ,ti"r,nr,.r �i ■■ � �11����1l�lr r yr �r �r rr.=uL SMr rr�r '!l111 I!. rt�u1u r t�'�� r �. r rIr r �\<f ■vJ ., ,rH _ �� „� � ��>I/1/ Jr �1 ��. /ri r ���' �� ems• �� tf//fit`� � �r rr wo \'� �f►�!!!�►�A rr �����/r rr r rr■ ►ram —� pIt � �IIlt/��� e ■ i rir rr r " rs�r rA r ,!/ r� r � tir �_ ^ � rw ,,' s ■ !! 11�� !i/�/Irr ■�l[t� \w !!! rA rti !4►��� t11I1! i/Il11111 n ,r ®. Li Cal 1 ! , rl ' ` /• N�." .,,, __.! •ref 1 t A 1v�i ti[ I _ ^�AkIR N� '� ,•t I �1 � i Q •I v { V[Uav ry dr f i ul z� an�any uanny�^ I �,) ` cd� -� CC << 1 1 / ° 094 �- f 1 AWL oi zz Zz LL . , a = 6 r-�..i -_ ,,,Liras.•a�v�t �e+icsi 7—! � ��.� �' �'- 1 (� qq CLis , ail _ �ntr�ay uaAny �"' Z ui W �r( -01 AMk P 1 •t J{ �� Ar � �` ! � •, �c � � _QUO q 72 0-4 3 c z �_ f • N' ,�.` yam''' !' i -� - z -;, -- iq LV x e p 8 1 1 N t e t own& lic 4�1 r • { Wtit: • ~ �e 11 .. ♦. IL 747 IXX �r '��i i'•T_ - / 77 t NIP mAh lot- February 09,> 1991 �, • '•,ter' , City Of Rancho Cucamonga ,`cur, tr' Post Office Box 807 ;DwIsia Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ATTN: Stye Ross, Assistant Planner Lear Mr. Ross, I am a Homeowner in the Northwood Community., I strongly' object to any city plans to construct driveways or streets leading into our community from Northridge. The privacy -hd security of our commtznity are of great importance to me. As a member of Northwood Homeowners Association aid having a sha^ed r interest in all Northwood Community rzrfairz, I am entitaed to receive information and notification concerning hearings or meetings affecting the Northwood Community. I Sincerely, M U ASt-iD A l�M&M- IA C� i CITY 01' I�.T,�_ RANCHO GUC AMONGA rMM': P!£ HOMEDWINEE 9 r-r' F', ENGTWMUNG IMMON SIT: " rm D-11 RESOLUTIq NO, A RESOLUTION 0" THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THR CITY OF AANCHGt C.UCAMCNGA, CALIFORITAr CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVL PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13693, LOCATED O!1 THE NORTH SIDE OF NORTHRIDGE DRIVE, WEST OF HAVER AVE'MM, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TIMRL'()P APN: 201-182-29 W%PJ AS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13693, submitted by Mrs and Mrs. S, Luna, arplicanta, for the purpose of subdividing into : parcels, the real' property situated in -cho City of Rancho Cucamona, County of San gernrrdino, State of California, identified as APN:;201-182-29, located an the north side of Northridge Drive, west of haven Avenue, and WHEREAS, on March 27, 2991, the Planninry Commission held a duly advertit.ed vdblic hearing for the aacve-described NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNii COMMISSION RESOLVES AS f FOLLOWS: I` SECTION 1: That the followiag findings haveberm made: 1. That the map is consistent with tte General Plan. 2. That tha :. provement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Garsral'Plan. 3. That the site is physic-II1 suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision Cad improvsrents will not. cause substantial environmental dat:••s- or public he&:.th problems or have adversF^`Tft is on abutting pro,-,,a,ties. SECTION 2: This Commission firds and cgrtifies that the project'etas been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and further, this Commission nerebs issueu a Negative Ueclara*ion. SECTYON 3; Tentative Parcel Hap *lumber 13693 is hereby approved. subject to the attached Standard Conditions and tSe iollow:ng Special Conditionsz 1. Builaing setback lines shall be plotted'on the Finai Parcel Uap, to the satisfaction of the City Planner, as follotaf,-: a) Front yard eetbam ^ shall be measured from the 14st property lines of botli pascelsj ° v) Rear yard setbacks shall be measured from the east property lines of both parcels; PLANNING COMMISSION'RESOLUTION NO. PM 13693 - LUNA March 27, 1991 Page 2 AWL c) Interior aide yard setbacks shall be measured from the north property lines of both.,parcels; and d) ' Street side yard setbacks shall be measured from the face of curb along Northridge Drive for both parcels. 2. The following shall be constructed prior to release of occupancy for either parcel: a) A decorative screen wall along the south property line of both parcels, the design of which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner; b) The driveway across Parcel 1 to nerve Parcel 2 c) A 15-£cot wide lcca:, fEeder trail along the entire southerly bound of Parcels 1 and 2 and a 10-foot wide local feeder boundary , trail along the east boundary of Parcel 2; and d) Private drainage devices to direct floras from bots; parcels to the existing catch basin nct•P the southwest .borner of Parcel 1. j 3. .'. Grading Plan shall be approved by the City for both parcels which incorporates the driveway, semen wa lP equestrian trails; ' and private drainage facilities. 4. Accese,to Parcel 2 shall be designVi to the satisfaction of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, including adequate turnaround for fire vehicles or acceptable alternate. Any gated access shall requirra a knox lock. B. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Reso—cces Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits bel3ssued or a crap recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding ` the associated environmental action in filed andposted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisor® of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, ;are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant z1hall provide the Engineering Department with a atamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that a,11 fees have been paid. In tha-event this applir�tion is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish f and Game Coda, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a ' Certificate of Fee, Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. U-l 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PH 23693 LUNA March 17, 1991 Page 3 APPROVED AND UOPTED THIS'17TH DAY OF MARCH 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairmaic ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Srad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of R.incho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing_ Resolution. was 'duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning„ Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held op the 27th day Of March 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERSe <, AESENT COMMISSIONERS: ANA Abk i i i { 0 0E 5!s s i. a V as a DE F`b. ~r �W ♦ �.b. O uz rj� 3po �� YCr '�� '�°.0 4°'� •ci.� 6 e d 1 =2 _'r —Egg V- a =z � €: � OesM,MVa zza b 3R, b f �f 1 . b .3 p Na s� bfi 3 �$ i . gq pFF� Z a Y tl ✓4 a C— {fir 4 �b� o s �qi . n.. _4+a• a..= e n CI 5 V ► I � D ,�- f f f I :� a f v� '-"$' ■.� c .+° vn guy _ Am Z WN Fe - 9 d� � Via• 3a^ Cum �J O ` uu CC C cY� a Yet+i VL � fps a u O O V Ly l tip YLY y^' O w rZ �l Deb F t°i LL 14•O.G YOf L V� pp cc p.� pp Y %2 Yy JO i r.� a� a� �p �.4 �} •� LNB� Ea uu �o yw cYa � CCC•u � Yo �Ya.B Yr.�` yY 00 a0 CC ig S C O L � Cy. „(y V V 1 Ll.�.. uL ■u . Y ar 01 G S ^ iGr V Y . S ep yy a r r C � O.SC .` YM• �L Y qq ryy 11.Y11 O u y Ya MFM VOA QL yY Y:G G J V.Y. E n ,� G4 '� °= .o �•= B E'er go�� go8 4� � =g �* ryeC 4 Y — y r�' ■ —: p Y CT g O: �V y t G 4 4 O �.M ' 0.►V 61 �V D �..+Q.v �QQQ(. � OC♦ Ji. N Iq fV /9 tr D_it� 0I72 OF RANCHO CUCAMONG STAFF REPORT DATE: March 27, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner_ SUBJECT: VARIANCE 91-04 LUNA A request, to allow a reduction of the minimum average lc' Eize from 22,500 to 21,540 square feet for a twe-lot parcel map in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 a'welling units per acre), located on the north side of Northridge Drive, west of Haven Avenue APN: 201-182-29. Related File: Tentative Parcel. Map 13693. I'. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action,Requested: Approval of a Variance. B. Project Dek.sity:_ Two dwelling units per acre. C. enrrounding Land Use and Zoninge North - Existing single family residential and vacant land; Very Lou Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). South Existing single family residential; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East Vacant land;Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) West - Existing single family residential and vacant land; Very Low Residential. (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) 0. General Plan Designations: Project Site Very,-Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - Low-Medium Residential East Very Low Residential West - Very Low Residential E. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes to the south at approximately 7.5 percent. A combination of native and introduced plant species are located on the site. ITE21 E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 91-04 LUNA March 27, 1991 Page II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The purpose and intent of the Variance is to provide flexibility from the svr3ct� application of development. Standards when special circumstances pertaining to the property such as sizOT4 shape, topography, or location deprive such: property of privileges enjoyed by other prcperties in the vicinity and in the same district inconsistent with the objectives of,the Development Coft. In reviewing individual cases for variance, the following criteria must be considered: 1. Special Circumstances: a. Is the property unique with respect of size, shape, topographyj:; or location? b. Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property or proposed use that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone? 2. Preservation of Property Right; (Hardship); a. Can reasonable use be made of the property without this Variance? b. Without this Variance, is the applicant denied privilegep enjoyed by owners of other properties in `the area?;. C. _ Is the hardship self-imposed or created by the physical constraints of the site? 3. Damage to Others; a. Will the Variance be detrimental tL the public health, safety, or welfare? b, Will the granting of this Variance be a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the same zone? B. Specific: The applicant is proposing to subdivide a lot, approximately one acre in size, into two parcels. Parcel t is 20,580 square feet, and parcel 2 is 22,500 square feet. The Development Code requires a minimum lot size of ^4,r000 square feet for the Very Low Residential District. Both lots meet the minimum lot size requirement of 20,000 square feet. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 91-04 - LUNA March 27, 1991 Page '3 However, the parcel map falls 960 square feet short of meeting the minimum average lot size requirement of 22,500 square feet. The parcel map is bounded on the south by Northridge-Drive, on the north and west by larger single family lots, and oii the east by vacant land. present and future lots to the north, east, and west of the site are within the Very Low Residential District, and must maintain a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet. The minimum average lot size requirement was s adopted. in 1983 to foster .and encourage more. creative subdivision layouts (i.e., more cul-de-sacs and curvilinear streets). The standard was ;iot intended to prohibit the subdivision of smaller parcels of land into lots consistent with the Very Low Residential District. A number of the parcel maps which created the surrounding ltts in the Very Low Residential District do not have a minimum average lot size of 2,7„500' square feet. The adjacent Parcel Map 5996, which created'four lots on the west side of Cabrosa Place, required a Variance.-'-,(Variance 87-08) to meet the minimum average tot size requirement. The average lot size for that Parcel Map is 21,750 square feet. Located along the, east side of Mayberry Avenue and adjacent to Parcel Map 5996 is Parcel Map 7902, which created four lots with an average square footage of 21,257 square feet. Approved in 1983, and granted an extension .in 1985 ' Parcel Map 5745 is located on the west side of Mayberry 'Avenue and is a mirror image of Parcel Map 7902. Allowing a reduction in the average lot size requirement will not create an usually small lot because both lots will meet or exceed the minimum lot size and all other code standards. It does not appear that approval of this Variance will constitute a special privilege,- nor will it impact adjacent properties in any way. ZIL FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Before granting a Variance, the Planning Commission must make all of the following required findings: A. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical .difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Development Code. C`� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 91-04 - LUNA March 27, 1991 Page 4 B. That there are exceptional .Or_extraordinary :circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that eo not apply generally to other properties in the .same,zone. C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of ;:he specified regulation would deprive the applicant of the privileges enjoyed by the .Swners of other properties in the same zone. D. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation oa the other properties classified in the same zone. E. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or Improvements in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a puhlic.hearing in the Inland Valle; Daily Bulletin newspaper, the, property has been posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Variance 91-04 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with findings. P.espec y submit ed, Br e City Planner BB:SR:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" -Vicinity Flap Exhibit "C" Parcel Map Resolution of Approval City of Rancho Cucamonga February 28,1991 Planning Deptartment 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 9172.9 ,E, i; -,.OGA RE: Tentative parcel Map # 13693 AN MAR 51991 {901111y143-12f314v5 8 To Whom it May Concern, A The purpose of this letter is to fulfill the second ,. .requirement under section B'. Filing Requirements of .the Variance request form. This item 'requests written justification outlining the reasons for the variance and why 'this, variance is Co ,�patible with the surrounding area. This variance is being requested in conjunction with tentative parcel map number 13693 Under th -rovisions of the subdivision being requested the individual` . t si :e has been exceeded in the case of bnth lots, however, the minimum average lot size is just barely below the m�aquired le,°tel. It is felt that this variance would be compatible,( with the surrounding area. A vP�riance of this exact nature has already been ,granted for other lots in the immediate area along Cabrosa Place. We feel that the small deviatior';f.rom the required size would not adversely affect, any of the home or land owners in the area. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this application please feel free to contact me at (714) 987-2868 between 8 A.M. and 5 P.M. Than_ you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincere 1 ' Steven R. Luna I Z' 1-04 (xy OF (� ;CUCAMOXGA THE:_LeLw N PLANNING-DMISION EXHIBIT:'�A SCALE: ' wrxn e�.x f f ®M v aw.APO 1 vm..# u®Q CG v O ® ® Nurin�.dge dS pr c a"lL Fir 'Vi. f d '1�✓ J yl ,?J ✓�l%f �rS'ir all = aj . ;•` "��i. �f9i.E.� • � © 0 �.� �� OO �r7@e - eon ` o "�r�, .�l,/r�•� t� ffFrl�� � ,/,, OY !� AV14 Carf 2p� ,, .. 1 ,°l�vlr.l�e� if U� FlP/ 'l/1• Cxv/.Mo pl,V.VIA— 1 f V ylrl M i Q i I F4: VARj6NLF. at-OA- M Y OF Fail` 614011 UCAMONGA .E:V,Lt N t rt m PLARTNING-DIVISION N ExHmrr:" SCALE: o� ( uTuT R � 3 • t uj Zrl N 1 h L t' ` ` c A Iti % t4 - -04 p�1Vpb7V�<i L'>''s j I I t ' � •• t � RESOLUTION NO. Ask A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL=FORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 91-04 Tn ALLOW A REDUCTION OF 1.E MINIMUM AVERAGE LOT SIZE FROM 22,500 TO 21,540 SQUARE FEET FOR A TWO-LOT PARCEL MAP LOCATED ONTHE NORTH SIDE OF NORTHRIDGE DRIVE, i' WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN- 201-182-29. A. Recitals. (i) Steven R. Luna has filed an application for the issuance of Variance No. 91-04 as described .in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the aPpliaatic,a." (ii) On the 27th of March' 1991, the. Planning Commission of the City or Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded oaid hearing en that date. (iii) All legal prerequisitee ^^'rior to the adoption of tnia Resolution have occurred. AML B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 27, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with publ?, testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on Cabrosa Place, north of Northridge Drive with a street frontage of-330 feet along Northridge Drive and approximately 40 feet of frontage along Cabrosa Place and is presently vacant and unimproved; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is residential, the property to the south of that site consist;e of single family homes, the property to the east is vacant, and the proper,-Ly to the west is also zoned for residential use. it (c) The application has been submitted to allow a reduction of the minimum net averao2t lot area requirement contrary to Section 17.08.040 of the Development Code within tie Very Low Residential District. i I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION VAR 91-04 - STEVEN R. LUNA March 27, 1991 Page 2 -,d) Both parcels meet or -exceed the minimum lot size. requirement of 20,000 square feet. (e) 'Existing subdivisions immediately north and west of the subject site have a minimum average lot size:of less than 22,500 square feet. (f) A variance to allow a reduction in the minimum average lot size requirement was granted for a four lot subdivision adjacent to the subject site. 3. Based upon the substantial +avidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation and 'enforcement of the specified regulations would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district, (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by thr awnera of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of mpecial privilege inconsistent with the limitations on properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, ov welfare or materially injurious to propertieu. or improvements in the vicinity. 4.. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. I i L APPROVED AD ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MARCH 1991. f PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, P j, I BY. Larry"T. McNiel, Chairman I ' ii PLANNING14COMMISSION RESOLUTION $0. VAR 91-04 STZVtN R. LUNA March 27, 1991 Page 3 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby` certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hr.ld, on the 27th day of March P91, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r `4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March•27, 1991 To Chairman and Members of the Planning ':owmission FROM: Brad. Buller, City Planner BY: Jerry uuarracino, iL'saistant Planner SUBJ-ECT: ENVIRONMENTAL _ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRAf, 14410 CUNtiINGHAM BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A residential subdivision and design review of 35 single family lots on I0, acres of land in the Low Residential Dstrict (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located 364 feet south of 19th Street on the east side of Beryl Street,.- APN: 202-041-01, '17, 22, and 24. Related File: Tree R, 'oval Permit No. 90-10. I. PROJSCT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. _Action Requested: The approval of the subdivision map and issuance of Negative Declaration in addition to approval of the Conceptual Plot Plan, Grading Plan, Landscape Plan, Tree Removal Permit, and Building Elevations for 35 single family homes. B. Project Density: 3.5 dwelling'units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Church; Low Residential (2-4 dvelli:yg units per acre) South Single family units; Low Residential, (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Flood control channel and single family units; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant and single family units; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low Medium (4-S dwellir units per acre) D. General Plan Designations- Project Site Low Residential (2-4 dwell ,fig units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling •nits per acre) South Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential 12-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low- Medium Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre); r E # � t ITRq F PLANNING CO,1MISSION STP.FF REPORT TT 24410 - CUNNINGHAM BARI8IC DEVr,`OPMEXT CORP. March 278 1991 Page AAft E. Site Characteristica: The project Vite is currently mostly vacant, however, a school mainte,,,ance yard exists in the northwest corner of the site. On-site vegetation conFcsts of 17 treen, mostly Blue gum Eucalyptus, in addition to annual shrubs and grasses. Although the site is mainly gently sloping with approximately 3 percent slope, 'a 'steep slope exists along the east side of they site. The toe of this slope extends of -site down to the Beryl/Hellman channel. The Beryl/Hellman channel separates this project from the residential uses to the east and Beryl Street forme the westerly project border. II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The applicant proposes subdividing and cdostructing`35 single family lots. The proposed lots range in eiza from 8,000 to 16,000 square feet. With the exception of one lot (Lot 22) all they homes will take their access off an internal loop street. This loop will intersect with Beryl Street at two lbcatione, aligning with Hamilton Street on tha north and Mignonette .Street to the south. The proposed homes consiats of three 2-story floor plans ranging in size from 2,100 to 2,500 squad feet. The homes offer three to five bedrooms and all plans have either a 3-car garage or a 2-car garage with bonus area. Seven d..stinct elevationa are proposed, not counting reverse plans. Exterior building materials include cyncrete the roofs, multi-paned windows, stucco or wood siding, atone or br!"' _veneer accents, stucco or wood window trim, and built-up wood! ` as. B. Fencing: A perimeter wail. is propob" _-nd the'entire site to include a decorative slumpatone wall a':a. Beryl Street and the north property line. A Brought iron fence is proposed at the toe of the elope along the channel and an existing slump stone wall exists along the southerly property line. A atucco wall is proposed between the homes and for corner side yard conditions to create a consistent streetecape within the project. Individual rear yards will be enclosed with a 6-foot wood fence (Exhibit "D-1"). C. Orientation of Lot 22: the need to align- street "C with Mignonette Street to the west created an awkward shaped parcel at the southwest corner " the site. At staff's recommendation, _he drive approach was placed on Beryl Slr,.Ft and the home was moved westward to accommodate a hammerhead driveway. This _4coamendation was made for the following reasons: 1. Ttr adjacent homes to the south between Traveler Drive and 'Atte Streot front ontoBeryl Street. The recommended C!- .tion will foster a harmonious and logical transition beY..:�tLn the existing homes and the proposed project. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14410 - CU14NINGRAM BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. March 27, 1991 Page 3 2. The code defines the front of the to an the side with the smallest street frontage. ;Therefore, the hocae is properly oriented to maintain traditional front, 'aide, and rear yard setbacks. D. Design Review Cpnunittee: The Design Review Committee (Weinberger, HcNiel, Buller) _„reviewad the project on September 20, 1990, and recomv-! 'td approval subject to the. following conditions 1. Revise the landscape plem to be consistent with the grading and site plan with regard,to the following items: U. Eliminate the double wall condition along.,the south property line. b. Provide a knee wall with wrought iron down the slopes beh#nB tots 31-35. C. DES', th retaining walls which project into the frw -rd of Lots 23 and 24,. 2. SuW ,a cc,.-.: sample of the stucco cross-lot fencicg for Aft staff'_e'.,iaw and approval. 3. The cap detail for the perimeter, slumpstore wall should match that ured on the Victoria Community walls (i..e., "rawll=k") 4. The developer is encouraged + to conduct 'a neighborhood meeting prior to Planning Commission consideration. E Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project .and determined t-Y t with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the projuan Lv� ;consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. F. Tree Removal Permi.t: The siti! contains 15 mature Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees, one California,rBlack Walnut-dnd one "Tree.of Heaven." The Walnut tree is exempt from pi, tsction by the Tree Preservation Ordinance. All of the tree` would have to be removed to implement the grading and construction _plan as currently proposed ;by the applicant. An arborist's report (Exhibit "G") was prepared for the site which recommended preserving_10 trees and removal of the Black Walnut, the Tree of Heaven and 5 of the Blue Gum trees (several of which were dead or dying', from Longhorn borer infestation). To preserve tte remainder of the Blue Gums, the following changas to the site plan and 3rading plan would have to be madea i j PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14410 - CUNNIt`,GHA)i BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. March 27, 1991 Page 4 Tree No. Change Needed 1 & 2 Adjust Lot 7 and 8 interior side lot lines and side yard fence location. 4 Build retaining mall to maintain natural grade w$,thin 4 feet of trunk and limit fill to 18 inches within 15 feet of trunk. 6 & 7 Same as Tree No. 4. 10 Same as Tree No. 4., 11 May need to adjust Lot 15 and 16 interior side lot line.1 and side yard fence location. Trunk of #tee would need to be m.rveye3 to determine, e:scx,f. location. 14 & 15 Adjust Lot 10 and 11 interior side lot lines and side yard fence location. Shift house on Lot• wi tiS the south and shift house on Lot 10 to t.io ;north, at least 15 feet away from tree trunk. May require elimination of one lot on east,side of Street "B" to provide sufficient room for trees and grading. 16 Adjust perimeter wall location along Beryl Sheet at the corner of tote 23 and 35. Wall footings and irG;gation trenches :should be kept IS feet from tree trunk. The arborist'b report only addresses preservation potential based upon the health and condition of the trees and does not attempt to evaluate the desirability of preserving trees in private yards. The preservation of Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees in side or rear yards has raised concerns in the pasta Where Eucalyptus Blue Gum trees have been saved in these circumstances, there have been some problems with appropriate maintenance and the ultimate survival of these trw-s in their new environment. The 'Commission will need to take public comments and determine whether in this instance the retention of the ten trees suitable for preservation is appropriate in private yards or whether removal and replacement is a more desirable option. G. nvironmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has Completed Part Ii of the Environmental Checklist and determined that the project will have significant school impact, and also cause the removal of all 17 existing mature trees located on the site. This determination is based upon written inpL,t_from the affected school districts pursuant to Urgency Ordinance No. 395 and the arborist"s report, respectively. Proposed mitigations include PLANNING COMMISSION S7:AFF'REPORT TT 14410 - CUNNINGHAM BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. March 27, 1991 Page 5 the standard_Melio-Roos school condition and a requirement for tree replacement planting as required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance. If the Commission concurs with these mi':igatior..^„ then issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration would be in . order. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to approve the project,- the Commisaion should make the following findings: The project in consistent with the General Plan. and will not ,be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant-environmental 'impacts. In addition, the proposed use is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the, inland valley Daily Bullettn newspaper as a. public hearing. The'prcparty has been posted and notices were sent to all pxoperty owners within 300-feet of the project site. No neighborhood meeting was conducted by the applicant. V. RECOMMENDATIQf1I It the Planning Commission can support the removal of all 17 trees subject to -replacement, then approval through adoption of attached Resolutions with 667ditions would be appropriate. However, if the Plamning-Commission cannot support the tree removal, then thu applicant, should be given the opportunity to revise the project to address the„trae preservation comments and the public hearing should be continued for_30 days. Res f y su Brad Bu .er City P anner r BB•7G:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location MaY. i Exhibit "B" - Subdivision Map Exhibit "C" - Site/Grading Plana Exhibit "D^ - Landscape Plana Exhibit "E Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans Exhibit "G" - Existing. Tree Survey Resolution of'Approval for TT 14410 Resolution of Approval for Design Review of TT 14410 SLA _ '� `d l o•- � d :.d..o� .a,:®�.o.�� •red. o ..R_� +a• _ 1.71 . L.�,3 a y ». A a; VAUNT w a•elm d � f � C .'d,: ..:�! I _0 YJ '� Q �O d —rJr a:} �3 mi.`� { -er. Ate'. ♦li 1 P ,\ii� 'ACANT •yP f �au. �4.+.rm v...,,,. TICANT 44 v� HT +YACAliT ,. Neu-lair-►c3>. y b b g 11 '� N CNt�NN�U i ' M 6 Sri de.twn urW ytl .w.r...... r s CITY OF W ',V(f '� UCAMP ONGA PLANNING-,DMSION TTTLE:loco ����, �.tWk 70� (D EXHIBIT: SCALE: IyT ate-,aat tl 7'f '1 i _Adak In., CC ii �� �Ci ;3�•a a f`'—� ���� �, aQ =llF' In •S .,`t �i°r= 'I f s;? tra il' a ' ^ r ,, � r�� � l,E� ,�•• -- a�L` __.. _ ._- -• / �� —'Z-_,Sic i-��� � x c xe x. i e=� NI` 4.1 .moo ----z;� �--+r.:.— T����a�-Y,°.���`'��•� � �� ®� r K k '�i S 3 1 z •�. N j S, t� T"I Itlt tat � a 2 deaea T li � s • t Ft 'i{ '. aa. IW � � °.. Ott, �� ��.i' a •a3ia t t.f•:IT,� � L-.:! ;� f� � �� •{� ��� ��� 3a1 ��.i t.S S :� �A 1 7�•p �t :o o .� � .t 4 sr 1 t Q � _II E•� i�i � ':u tali �Ii�l�{ � � } F .. •- f C w ac_.' } If�Ai1 t� f � i •--='•fi"'S a�' s! 7. I. .♦ � j��.. �5.. -'�•° � �� •t' a t^<�`� J{ c y a4F i ti• ✓' � t ff III +r'r/ _ �'�•—; ,*! ? i�.n',. 1 f �t=' •� e - d-tip 4P r r � .+ � �i`; F •. s� �f€ G• - _ JL FXM►IL-1 i C-I �� S�7e.`f-�i�n f C r •. Nl ,, 1 7 1q-410 v i� x Y Fj { Q y ta a ,t J +Y € i _ u' _ - -� t•t t, , t :r p 17 p. y-� t n -� tiit3#SSPit I i C c s; 00 � i ry f7 Si :lj 0 0 o. zit ¢ � rr." •�~W� � �t� �* ^' _ 14 • 2. ' 13 Agah c 3 u 17 f/•-tom J�.�.' ('�•'� r' � N �'.Lj7...�� _�—c i�_ ° -•• 1, � yry'� - •I� � to� , � ��1a:•A,r � ; XNt \i -1 P7, 1� o i d -.-�• t ,i`r' �•, ' _9j� it i_• YlL4 02 ( H Y O - 1♦ a� g 0 0 to W - W W a' us ` 1 Y P ® ~. J ' a. ♦Y. IT` h-2 Fend 1xiia��s T 1u�tto . •a i 1�fi'• � �t•' T ■■A■ i ■A■■ 4444 !t�■ ■/ t1y tiii ■■o �II■/■ F.�,I�.r 1 a�l4 1■r•�Ft� �t�' t mom ['It{slili �at!`" 7' � !. irr•�''1!1�t � ■.■11 ��•��it{ man offam .ia_ 111 ■��IF�!�:�i'i9 eidri all , .a j F ' 1 .r'1ti ;e'•'iy � t tl ra Mal �� ■. 1 fy t {t O h i�. It. ■i.� II II;r O lit .f arts ��(• - •■ iM�. tti,•.0!,� ur � .t �.f ! .... .It try 1 a,•�-;�;f; 'µ:, �1!5f�� Cam,"• Hill ii(■ (t;�r�ss�.: fy!�•t )♦ sst.s !•:,(•i t(■.!t(- !•'- r, �1��1(it�titil sA•ss 4� i . ■■ r/aAo� .��.�ns�■ f fil�, N tar tt yf� WEis i,rraa a; +y4�� •;� ��I rt • ■ i t s j wqw■ tr� ii `fit■I�f ■ d . j� iii .�,.: elf,�- /(�/ =_■: �11•li �ii L , . .. �.. t, ■��t�,l- Cis 3� �' ■i 1•:I°tlll� "i mf ■■■■ •■ttf� i ■su � — .i■t_ ■ sus• 'i7 URN 1 t ■ sttss_�• �� s sssts�,... �. 51 �;�'��. �� j��ty it � iil ■■■■ h:•r�lll': II'1Mll IR R : ,il BSI yl'�■lii�� 1 Mi! 1 It `T JIM 1��1`t •t ■1 t,I�,tt jl i•i,l;i4 ;.;11�1 '�M ■'11 a �Ij�■1�_ �lFi 1'jylll' s, i457 its 1 - t it t■ii fj. !!- �' � 7�1y ■ 1 !i:jM L,: m �■ r rwrr w■a�1 f!// , i�i� t� i {•tl�i .rar ■�aaYa ~' t': q •� 1 mto t°I '1 1llirt'1 t 1��1��1;iY'yct _mow tt- '1 s l �T #' t iyl ■rr,•,t[ �■ I. ���tl� rrrr �.� errsw .. rra. tti.rrw ■■. .awe. �{ ro. ■' t'r�i sa.r Y Mill, b { �Iri�ll••1 �..��r1 + Psir,M Hill" li i4v' won Ili +t•,l 1�''j�'1�t,''t- i�it�4•i it1; u +i�lj�i,, t•ti+� iifi � �?i�jli' C�;I � w.I, ,. IN is is O�' •�I •,1CI,I � ? '� ;•I:i sr Ili it ' ��� I It r n s■s ison f �11,i,'ORItiII■p19�1B; � i i Itiula ■■ .i■ 1'1I'(1jli 1!.gt!�tilIll k •��I<tiNH}HiIINI.. .;�pi�`�li<i ='=_■1 ,tlti /yr ,1-tl•�-�Fl ili;� Glj ji W�IIINk611_ .� 11!11 ,412 Hill ll IN I,a14ry1�1 ,i 1 i'I III �,• ;. ■ It � leht. t I+n■���+•t I t!i '�'''i't11�1�1t1'I�le 1'll I!Itt�I I,It�1,t1;lI;I!t,�III iF�it�!I; ■.■■ t�-Ijl�ljt�ijt■tjl�'�'�4 'iesiii Y Ijleill'ii :::: HIM t ly+ a.'� -'y 1 F St 1 tl ��iiA 1 as .� sr■d'1�1� ■�I■s b��. r■■ ,tl ■r�:r �� ■r riii I M■r■ rl .. A \�"-=-CL�-'-'mil rl■r. Alp 1 ....re:r. k■■S ■r �.a�rjL; all i�:•it� �: i�j;l��i '��n� ��lII:I�t ■rr It itj��'ii!',1,1 iliit !4�4i1i ■r■ .�h iIIItl'II �— '1� � , I■ru , ��'ISI'I ,� � —:_.. elW�f[��`eBuetuext� d OSvbb'�I1.�ttL P a Gs1_ 1H C o$ N LJLJ G l'�J l9 i Q Q fo , XN115(T . 1:7-1 7 1 yrQ AROWD wwwopma wed WM15UILMO epaio�'e�+�J a OtM'ON!VVHL o" '� SHOO URIMO D]HON i o N Q i 0 � u a Q ' l I r �� --- A-dumo imdopwa VsWe u-45utuuna qugw3 e&—jj8 n9 a{ME1 mvt,1.ON dOVlit 4 ' o 7-7 __ t `• - o rn n6 ol Q 6 . ® o 1 111i3'ti r3 i 1Uyr3 21 s� � LVA La > � _ aw A cc 1-O. fa 04h C o w 0 ®o 014 .a K `D ero o� �r tea° • ° r i4 � � � Ll yg d Ln',° _�'t'a '� °°4 � ,au• �— Y ` .� s'�``- �T..r `�. L R' T 1�wf y��-• _ Aft 10 ow art' ; 353� c'3, F F'.. fi '^-34r,ti I .• O 1' 'l�' � "l.: _ ''1 Y�\� � — - d {+• u # �., '{ter• �~ � I R { MAW 22 e , Rl ITEM: OF RA�04 1CUCs°�MONOA PI.ANNI I3MSION TITLE: N r �3 EXrIIBI'I': ®ZSCAI F: 14 O (n N L7 a N - c tp ro , C N N H b N 24J44 w m m a N N w 110, N yy w w ut N w l'a v d w aJ. U U O U U O O U U O (0 U 8 U O b RMo 'In 0 Ra �11"—t1 N (:On , .0 A m �y A O N CA a�i >pE a� pEa a > E>p >pE Eap a a � N H N 4 Gl H 4U .a a x w rx P w W. a a a a a a a a x 14 N WO f.� La C G rt yU� pN U v oan,, >�, p10, b O13, N pp p sA ��j � � to al 51 9 j Cn O O O O to O N O O O O V1 to. O O tf/. U'i V d' M �' t11 tf1 N R lf'1 N v C s!' lt'f cP O er ,. G N *4 W M 'm C-1 ri *i i i l i i fL r-i rWi •Ci .W-t .-A-t +-qi 411 q43� E '-i, C1 M V, ttZ S- RESOLUTION NO. low A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 14410 AND RELAYED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO. 90-10, LOCATED 364 FEET SOUTH OF 29TH STREET ON THE EAST SIDE OF BERYL STREET IN TRR LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-041-01, 17, 22, AND 24. A. Recitals. (i) Cunningham Barisic =.Developaent Cd. oration has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map�'No. 14410 as described in the titles of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On tY .27th of March 1991, the Planning commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonr conducted a duly noticed public P,xaring on the application and concluded sait hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution j have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it in hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Coudn;)sion during the above-referenced' public hearing on March 27, 1991, .Anciuding written and cral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located 364 feet south of 19th Street on the east side of Beryl Street with a street frontage of 660 feet and lot depth of 660 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a church, the property to the south of that ai•_e consists of single family residential, the property to the east is the Bery1mellman channel and residential, and the property to the west rs single family residential; (c) The applicatio^ and related Tree Removal Permit application requ, t, contemplates the removal 9 all 17 existing mature trees; and (d) Written input fro;' the affected school districts indicates insufficient rapacity to accommodate students generated from this project. i i i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14410 - CUNNINGHAW BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. March 27, 1991 Page 2 r� 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during.the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specificfindings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1. and 2 above, thin Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) -That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements �.o£ the; k-gntative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of dev&Ylopment proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to huaans and wildlife or-their habitat; and (a) The tentative tract is rot likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This commission hereby finds and certifies that the'-project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, thia'd6mmission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.. Planning Division: _ 1. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment. of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide in conjunction with the applicable school district for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, t,i the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing district prior to the recordation. of tho final ;nap or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIOWNO. TT 14410 CUNNINGHAM BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. March 27, 1991 Page 3 Further, it the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months of the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance ,,r�L building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed.null and void. 2. Tree Removal Permit No. 90-10 is hereby approved subject to replacement'"planting on a one-to-one basis with Eucalyptus maculate (Spotted Gum), minimum IS- gallon size, in conjunction with slope planting along the easterly tract boundary. Said replacement planting shall be noted 4n the landscape plans:: 3. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code-.Section 21089(b), this application shall not be oy'<rative, vested or final, nor will building permits ! be issued or a map recorded, until (1), the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; anal (2), any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required ! handling charges, are paid to the County Clark of the County of ,San Bernardino. ThP ;;Applicant shall provide the Planning Department wit; a stamped and conformed copy of the Notice of Determination together with a receipt showing that all ,fees have been paid. ! In the event this application is determined exempt from -uch filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder,_ except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition_ shall be deemed null and void. Engineering Division: ,.. 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical), on the project aide of Beryl Street, it shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site - north of the projects north boundary to the first pole south of the project's south boundary, prior to i public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) to it occurs on the opposite side of t:;e street. PLANNING COMMISSION tESOLUTION NO. TT 14410 — CUNNINGHAM,BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. March 27, 1991 ; Page 4 i 2. Landscaping within the "Limited Una Area" for the projec-, intersections at Beryl Street shall be approved by the City Engineer. 3. The portion of the Beryl/Hellman channel, including access rends, within the project boundaries, shall be dedicated to the City. 4. The property within the project boundaries east of the Beryl/Hellman channel access road shall be labelod a Lot "A." The developer shall rake a good faith effort to deed Lot "A" to the ,adjacent property to the north. S. The portions of those parcels known as ZPN: 202-041 36 and 202-981-23 west of the centerline of the Beryl/Hellman channel shall b(, incorporated into this tract by a lot lie adjustment to be recorded prior to the approval of the final map. mots it through 14 shall be extenCed easterly to inc-lude the tvea west of the west channel access road. 6. A request to vacate the excess City storm drainage easement want of the west Beryl/rillman channel access road shall be submitted and approved prior to approval of the final map. 6. The Secretary to this commission shall certify to the adoption of thin Resolution. i APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MALCi 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. MCNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad BvIler, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, zt a remular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of March ISTI, by the fol.lowiyg vote-to-wits AYES: COMMISSIONERS: l NOES: COMMISSIONERS: i ABSENr: COMMISSIONERS: p �0 .. N Y'Fy O�Y:ys •A9 i9 rT �Y�� • BCD Y S.L i cco as vd� Mi yeS. � w �$j cyn+ vu. oyo: ai paouco. vie ow� ...�. i'E.d. �p`YO •y+.�q. �L N C Y. •G..W H Y«�p 6. ���qq �C[td5 q 7 x�d Y L L C L y O q R C3 WY� y yf LSp. dY0 'Z 1'.1L YO•p =C■■M3y, _ �. 's..yap vav -rJ' �•..^�. caos'��» w•L ME's°'m acaw°�= YT ^a.p > coN.� cps cp L xNd�6i Y��0� 60° Y CS� PMY' ENO w�.Ct V4qM 4 d4�Y�M O °aO CS a. G C s6^.O ✓V P� q V #z5m YV N�.'..Cp d. a°OaiO ip pas. .i mN g—��waayKS �.� Lp IDp G ed>��M00 yp�. LO ®® O ry�yV L 0 0~nm =„ ' �'L ^L y q � Y a C R L p tl`6 Y tf L. M 4 G Y alb u ee yW 00 O wJG y■ V N P P Y6 Y ^y Y.0 g G O 3 L O O 5 L 9 O ��uRno'si'n"L'e�i'+`• ctaaao'R o:uo� 's».xTi5§ �04soaiLaia m i, f� a2 +v1t Y b M.tl�L O�y��Tp U Lpi Y � � L9 Yq■aq, H u C • pp I q �� � S ♦C a Q H OIM� Y a aal L�Vy :. _ yZ �{COOU aNpG V V C. a30 V 0 t0 CCNO Hu'il yy y. O•y ¢ u�LiYa H � N eY+'O� S N � a O v a 9' fffsss���j•('•+c dLa�C�p-Y 42 Stn, L Y^LY4<JC pM r O. �..{V tl¢i�S p{Si '{■C1 O p pup L4.1� Y1 y�rMVVY~uYy Y p k _■'q3 � `4 22�' � g�N � Ci f � �li �T9••s MCY� 1 � W •V.. �= .V.H J ..1 N 17 a Y) a� a.-d•v b - dw. .La p'a Qp, n a'^ ' '"g. .3 o+}i V: 0.V rd" 6.d p.Oi.�N�b4 uq Y LYL�N. a •q M d �N o c G \ C u�I n ipe N �' «wy.M dYN4Y00-S YOa daq aqN a ELT y yy� S ug ` te24. Nd Y .r 6® Ld'��a r:�•�•voL- o.$..Q.i pt":�i`rxd .o.a.cd u._ .o..sd+t "' cv m.,. .+�... Yu V E N.Vi �N .0•lab ��L $ V L OO.p 8 L Y ^;p L C L. N O ypb O d O N L.I ^ 2q' 3d� VqN '.Y 6G9—1 •" gl�yNCVpY�1 OY� Y CLg6Ll CW, ONq V^C S GOy rod .YN L.d Cd eo >.. .Q L_,av gp�euLV �yQ �' a�. i+dppi..iyII w.� yoy•'tc� Nc O y a _O YY $�V L Y Y O o c o '�Ye. ua' "d� 'goy agues NQ vq > O.9aW YLd L YM ONo,,CVC t� d^O d�Ia q.& qC L�y.O NY 4CNQtM ON. ra ..fib N�uY�N >>O ^y OO Sj'd G3 NO q �G '0 sp,y > Y.a I'Q C hT4:— O Vy �N ��C' IL as a.��0. QVUM^ Yy VL D p CN 9Yp.y■Y■u �V.YC U�i Nw WU }y}.N�V O 6O C �V��S vC.N. C �ItY�Vb �G E.;2 IL CNYY^ ilf ri uJiN L�.BN Vtai G �1.O.muOiYur`.b wra GO <L.OY� NL 6. b U 12 p53Y AC �Nw ^q OS�04w a«'«� ors Z; �'•-`yy�,2 av .Qoe NFra. o•�SN$.gZ a`L" . o�cjY�i gli O<LV YL„ a�Y ft0 upi 0.� C � L a'Y Cg a Cw'y.r%L tb C�L aggg{�'o. 'go LV No rJL# b Q�9 �,Y V q� �.C� ar M•J'. �v 6�p}Q�0� p104� �~>F'y > � agile L^_3 v� iWi. Floe Y. "��c c+^L •,,,'ea�� VGVY. P^ r.Yp Nab V� Y' yy Op. Z P d c C•O^ C a �2Y`6 r.6. L a 9 Y=o i V y Y y qO C N_N da Q V�~ N4L� iC dy Y1� r.tla9 Ou d`WtlyydYO f, aQ cva 8`` NA EgC iG.L CLugc cv'�yq.. L"4Lc'. P. 09 `maw v� 'aI TYp idc' v3gra o�yr'� 1I d v ¢ y^ey I 4 to C-. dLLON 0 c r3.V t t. •.tt L qaJ .gip d� 5:5CVY JOoaOv uOrJ' .13.12 csZ. va >r, $Y�c paY cy ��b�'Nm �` cu dYON OO�i *�.V ^Q O d4'4L ®rny COp'Op G. O 'y c9 u L{�C�q Vy �o>y u+1 C y-•u i+ >p i LAWA V6y{G�UO tJ l V� ..�pdV. Fs �V O IvpCV`emu dVyvy d00.0`d §KK§ K,X-.P.. N.P t+C N O C r N a V l w q C Y J.5 g -5 iII. ^ ail y N C 9 i-w q.S p L � O N LGw¢. CO. L OC Uu O�D OM�41 d.L Y.G �yC.dC OI LY CY'M ; aS L G G N Nb p d DW O C L p>a' _ L d Z. yy C G L Y C 6 a C rJ d .PVC y _\ V�.G N Y G U I O O P p1.4=C<�V q O 4 �.U U • 4 01 y o. N�^N �M G O.M pa �V Oi.'V.pO NL Ao!6QL a'� •�Tw� L 9 N 9 1 $ V O u Y U o°•..*.O p'Y Y '°'d q jiv1:a r c ^G pMq L C C 9R. ]N�V.w du• N. q Y«T A^! =budu. 4rN OOK j�L OYAC N. 'N. d NYpCpL � ^ =L dAM >� q••p.NNYV PV�.Y d~VN� ..,pi tY '� G,lo a~1 01 Ci=a Lty'� WL GN Ot LP1 Z =db G.p Vlpy�j`a^ r�.L TYw aQ CN �c bgo.,: Ng O . uP41 .u'. Y+w•�.W Ca 'oe '° ads'. cwc�. aG�o,•-y. aU Ut II 60. Yam. p CU LqL� N�acY b^dQ!q}f�! aN.G Od � gNNpa dN�a p Nam+ �t yyL p•M.L ~ L CM S •C L Y Y O^9 i .N O 6.p Olw O�U •$ G M b N p 0•L p. N q p LLd C YY C .0 C—Y Y ` G N .. N Z^L vCy N`O �Q L�ub�NgC� C.bey R wrl.f �9.^ N SON O W G CV�Vy y ICY Nydy �Y.q� 6Y�> 6N p14 NLY qbL G Y��bO Np O� 01�Y s0 y ULd I •r IO.. O�LY dL.7 �NMd�C.V NP�y �O 9 CN�.1C Y {I{IDp �(.4' • YLD�N^ �a GCM pY: CCCn a by Y LL 01 N.0 L Yb'p> y YL. OC�Jy OaNd.db Or pN •L�.L Y .d 9•VdNiY NCp nSTr'.~yp Y GY tip U_.NNV•OpC T: �ytlCp 6 V C. a.•.C.Y • @@ CC !_'y 131 ON 17 �W 3� r�pO LLC OF ggY g _q d fi " .0 _ 1avio.•P:v a't yuy Le'Lyy cc v oYv�w N NbN 4 N� 6N 9M0 H Y. CN J��01i ggNap Cb�06 4.Y �0:9 DM MW ; y d qY Od vC 4O A ' NG�G �� C21 ^""T9 sd. c3 OG t�T C� NC�C.. `•9~n •= n: p o.yr. I w Im Y 9 r « _ C• GGbL Gi 6�d YaC�YY SSaR �pn N N p^■■ S LLv .CJ O: C p4oLLMa YVV f QY N� CL U`Y' C pCS cM C.�L� MM •^ •.. DO i C Nby L4_ y N C pM. Cwy+ Y Y Lp. LVyG. p~ dLVbL C UY�yy r•TO.O NN Smzej . �Cl �V i �' LC Y pL NNbV C C�YN SMLL•l� • L V? �•.. O Y 4 Mr ry �C r 8 N UVp' CLLG by GY i No pL G V�L.G M.w. NY � O.�.C)V� �4 R•� Y V>6� C Or tl C aY MY.Gn a 6G L. aiL T� �4L� mob. L rSv NN4 Y.Y uCV�' CrN4Y b L N V M 4 ;TJ V d 'Y n O �^ $9 V O • C L ' i L•O TyY� v • 5C C O..wG, YU!z p LvgF `s. N Luc YyrpAi+ " rN u>�d Zs r d V p G N VY 9 0-2 6 L. =�9 L•V. N C y u ^L L p G 9 Y.N. G p. U • N TC G UQ{�C�'r. y N {� CCN bU ~T VI r I nw- V 3 ,v '=• i.o+q'. o Bit! !2!52-1 RL ^._'vl�yi � N yCLO a LL NN V �G V d p L Y G Ijy'4 y � . d 5-4- d" O' O yT y� VNNd YLdU C.z^NNNyyy111 p. > U. Q OLL «eUSS Gpq y p� L y N F 4 y A V V d LL d • p y O L V Y Hun y y O VISAp,.n� �L�C xWy LSS� Y Ly� �y Yy C a. mqV Y C;4 yy-O N E T Q M C 4 C A 4Oyy�yy CC L ��C SQL= ^G.00 q06} S Y4piN� �gVTY V9CYV � / �q �+ p ayY ni'Y^d. ot•N !y c qy o"v c aL v Nu'•�p pY«�€. d �- tv� ogye^ d9[�ay ^ c C � 9 N8U Y y0U�0 j�V C L it 4 C p�UpYy NL� OVA. ����Y N.�=. �i '■pO - A Cyg^ d'Y2a 9y@WWWy CC Y n A pq � O V� C •iq L�9 O by.� � y � VL^ Y d rrN J�D L d n 9 I��G� j LMCI �) \I 4I ax _ c.- p,t.VV Y. y C! • Y O N�. LL6. V YO 3Vn qC N Vp�q OyV uC iV Yn, O n.`R YY Y�.. yNG 2,2 A 4 p LVq T Y qC ^'ygj V Ly^ S !! N L. y i `N N "«CL•ri >u p A Ga ,�vl qy NyV Y. G NiVppIO� �Y6 L n^t V Q Y jL.,L d ' ' NYq OEOY � Y.pN4 . L' Ol�gw dOdgV ���� .91 a nnMo a v yp'}}i {T. lu-L B. Eli cY3ugo cc Nun uyc'"��, C AC yyY Y p C Nptl C i ^ 6 n{} Y LL.LL 3e Y L Hv C. �luC rrd y V V i 'yVr� ' ^ !Or ;ME •JqO W C • .. ^° a e�p nocY q c C«• E21P �cbd u� ep$ 9ua�p. 0.-6 O gyp■■p O Y..� ■■LLAft gib. � Q++�P dw n 12 <.a� Gcpi«� �~ Y N N NI c o+Yd�q L y4 o N p •J d^' \ yy{wL gOY60 :, Yw A.. A Cy Y. d ! =n Oyyd L L C y Y M� aL•..•. o V Y>L W E G L. d Nip dd Dom. ON. E a aCa > Ou .aC YY�.�pnnp9 UL V y Y. PO N�0IL 1 yNC06q d.L NM OY. C 'C G a q9 �. r� J. C�Lq C y1L y R L C U q 1dr G 4 V gN ■N d Y d Yn .L _ YC Y nin. a ate. L.Y. tY« yy Y�YI � .. Ya yq Vc p G L A L.�p wG.•tj� w; _ N q q q W` ^ 7Y0 Yam. 6• Ct � � � Y� c .a rv` �W uG� is�Q■. �d O u'u _ Y pv C p ..pC.C A i ". J y O�qa s �^• a�y0 �p:E.. x. a �Oy ✓ax �. $.N. p CL ¢» ILOAV COY VO 9fq ` � yEtl'Y-� Y a V 9 q 00.+W GOY6%ee SqG C Vv YN CI O z W Y J C.G G AY L LA_;5 m C O E Y p G O M C S r= y C a w VM 'V YAL �M.. u�..pi mA aR... LSpwy 8.2 �.p ^C. ^V AGa • �L `gYG pq V YV..W� G.nQ Y� y,p a. vn o` AGNc aN $ �= o� o r y�Y �+ � ..N Lp`4 ''� » 1�t« yp� ;ate ■dd�X C� J.sY Y� oon�G a. �.G 0 M Yj a.;.' p�a ! « Y ®j.&p Q �p O �4yP p L L PSN �sp[t a;OYC OAS rp yy W.H F CN�P�pp L� O� ' �OrO� 7290 C.$A Ys F{ Y';G O O.a■■ YO�Q S� qVc M` C A� pp NOGp{.� 24CC p a.C40pY ��Z.. Cld� {� pL tl�MO L Opl YYCD` V+ ••.0 8 S�V YrG 6:0yU Y.UCQ=y. G®L��S LCUC4 p�• y N LwSRM p6YV N C�Hr�p�� {y► q tV M q Yf V1 vl 00„ Nd asp rd o:KaaY .d.. .d, IN �w e u NYQco �.0 ac. c '^^ gwEt rc ' c sp°« Yi _ do.«YCp. NC GlN Y.. Y w y LLnL YY Lo �dr. o Y o cri „,,,� w a ua •q ' � c� YA Y �Y al 'N OSt yy a w � Yc yyYC � •I C C a w .j dy Y y M O � L q � O L e y A�d0 A.^ ayLV C v~ YY�OIN Y Oy U dy w ' � bl L y Ui y cc a ww c Q Y o Y a �. eoy; ci as Ne as u' •- L+a..« a My c pa"' yY'� �> YN t` o. O a Y o rn'tY' n'2r'�ot�il c $:r 1t•�`co' io„ u a^moo tQc,i o`pi C �Y �:.cas . «■y a. cc aYo _«.u. ' n w.o. WC d) SOS 'o� qaaC L�'� =L. r4�. .2b. �(c�Q{111e �ppc >a a pYp U NW V; y!: C G9 O yC L C -qya bO w d E w �Ny�' ''^='.o u 4 a.- 1� Y w Y-�i i vl, v o O 11 WMN-11.0 '3wG VD 4W a ,C Nf9 � 4U 6_ 1�0 rC. �NYW 460 ' 0 tT � II! S ` 2 COL �� d NCO Y Gam. M O S ASL W U ^ p M N L w c`« OI.n yO dlYi'. C •i � NY L Y C i C+Y • U O_J. `t Y _Y • Y C (jam C O._ d 2' p Gt9 « �'if .) �yC gW_n6C '0 d C0. N +L O� ■ JJJ Yr tT Y �OI ■y nQ GpN� n.� Oy 1 c\ CY O Y�pM pn '. tr C YI c�vxI e, itC ■Y L q C _emuu Ei `� cy �c N`IrrI . Cs.A yyy ocy. YHA < L W L 829 w:L f j a U r'" L Y O1 61 y L tT U NIW.1 ICW I a � W i moo. maw d�OOii o.+p d Fto$ D'c� O NOL YCa. GL il?••aNi C � y L.,� p■p■JJ LY i „q 4 C 6� SSW W p N ♦a ?O V L A • O M r 7 S L N Y iOp a'eGQ Ate• N .r7 �T .-.'� y^ S Y YO 1 a Y G Y. � L � T ••• 9 G ,y Y 225 a°i' Yo..Gi �.� w •L•rt. Y i` cy o.«.!'e• - GE $�' nv:. Mu u•Li�a 'r's•rim he AmEp �Yet! i a., �� o. ova o� =- "•.c "�•'�o a� ac oa�1Y4 k' ��>9 v §Y .L.'i" '' eSi� Gs.� Yi'pIRa21 `G'c V ~ Y Y Q Y O w 'Y C y On i Y a Y23 �nG Y � �[1 b r� m� Y�•� N� ` N 1•f f N i _ o• F-.., RESOLUTION 6:0. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING• COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFQRNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW' FOR TRP_CT NO. 14410 AND' RELATED-TREE REMOV.§L;PERMIT NO. 90-10, LOCATED 364<-FEET SOUTH OF 29TH STREETfOlt`:•THE EAST (` SIDE OF BERYL STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISWRICT (2 4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS !1q SUPPORT THEREOF - APN• 202-041-01, 17,`22, AND 24. A. Recitals. (i) Cunningham Barisic Development Corporation has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract 4o. 14410 as described in the title of this Resolutior. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) on March 27, 1941 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the''application (iii) All legal prereduiaites prior to the adoption oflthis Resolution' have occurred. B. Resolutioa. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the'City of Rancho Cucamonga ass°follows:: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. _ 2.. Based upon substantial, evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on March 27, 1991, Including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically 5inds as follows: (a) That the . proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the mite is located; and (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of tt,gi Revs' opment Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto will not be detrimental.to the public PP li health safety, or P Y welfare- tar materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. i I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14410 - CUNNINGHAM BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. March 27, 1991 Page 2 3. ,'.Based upon the findings and conclusions set fortis=_l Paragraphs ! 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every 'condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attache9 hereto and,-4ncorporated herein by thin reference. Planning Division: 1, Eliminate the double wall condition along the south property line which is shown on the landscape plan, 2. Delete the retaining wall which projects i7ito the front yard of Lots 23 and 24: 3. A color ormple for the stucco cross-lot fencing shall be submitted for staff review and. approvai. 4. The cap detail for the perimeter slumpstone wall shall match that used on the Victoria Community wall&. 5. Project signage for the Beryl Street"jentries shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to issuanbe of building permits. fi. RecreatL-nal vehicle' gates shall be installed adjacent to the garage where setbacks allow (10- Ili foot or larger side yards). 7. Fill. perimeter walls sad fencing shall be constructed per the conceptual grading plan and wall/fence plan.<: S. All landscaping and 'irrigation along the Beryl Street frontage, in czrnsr side yards and slope planting, shall be completed per the conceptual landscape plan. 1' 9. Tree Removal Permit No. 90--10 is hereby approved subject to replacement planting on a one-to-one basis with Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum), _ minimum 15-gallon size, is conjunction with slope planting along the easterly tract boundary. Said replacement planting shall be noted on the landscape plans. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. AM I _ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14410 - CUNNI.NGHAH BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. March 27, 1993':' Page 3 t APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TIA,DAY OF'MARCH 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCH1,CUCAMONGA BY: 1j Larry T. MCWiel, Chairman 'f ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I� I, Brad Buller, Secretary of-,the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cent f-i that the foregoing, Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of March 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERSc NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 11 ABSENT:. COMMISSIONERS: l I I �VJJ 11 t 1y w cog +$O YtiI GgSL L=YG aY^ul�U.a aUa`YNy w ZO q$ L NC.� O.UCL 09 }09 4.2d,U w<$yi ^�k �y�f^� nd dY�d„oY �q6V U4 j�� 213 CY (.i FL.� Cam.. Oe ■pYO �xp ��/ _ Aq= 04� qaj C`yp A. OtgJC y-`Z.QY.. M0 Yyp 2-1 a s' vo s.Y.� c ° ZZ +�' ao � ...eu yyy-S.ps Gig O g 6 u O Y of 9 p ^~`,�qZ Y N O u g C `Ya 3dM 4ua Cp M �L^ NG.y 0 'y^21% ■■yy c—6 ^L pC{�YO�t°dOyO�gp a>OL\ z N•LY•O N Ng0 �N^� G `�f'MY .Oa p.0.•. ,LY ANC C�N O ps i . ZC S-e$ icR +q'oY. cap. Y v4�g'^Y �a. u'N'-^ c P d $ �.a• oq��aa �N o.� a�i Fa p` dui' ai �d o.o �cu� G p a .A Y'LO L q�pq•L^�4 pnaoc. tri.yyuB ...6c nPy'o�Cgl"'S ~av� a��s �� $.d Y.LuGYa Yw Y4Yd `p+ MYycLY} +gip S qq E ^ p Y C N 5 N Y f C Y y O$ tw a .9 a po.TC C{~.i Y`iM^ ^aCC rU ^.�I iiiiiN`y�j Ld�.r. p> 6 LM y•:.SOY. OC V 5 :A^C M y 5 J t t F V!h m r MaC4 O J},� 1F NeBY. yyy. > Rr..N+v��CY au IE Y �i> r. � aM. x�CM�ouYY�aiy� oi+>LCY9yY 6. UYp a N at -4!f2—LlVad,4 `C '. V Y N C O a 0 Y Y Y O L Yy^=�Yo .~.• �ae �• � Ypp� G • YQ. K�C Its r�g x$a s'N' lix tt H =B aciv9 a> a\ - .+ w...ua.e Yd ue v \-v ►. Ya .y6 c H-,■ .G3 �a Y2 aGy p«vp bra Y C O p -� Y V O -G a�O W— c q`L r S 60 8H LwHYeGS� 'id Y pp G Y4.. V M �O7y�`VVO VLy�iY � V VSV Y` \ Y■O' V+Y.+ YCNq V O y�p O�jG+ ONy q+ � � q O a 1Ny.y+y •rS N •+ (�q q o O•ti a�+ O$d y�O �G N Y�L p q y LOq �'� Qyt N L y G�v t~ ^A' O P O1 N y L q O. V N N`` ~ Pig—, a q�y V�.�YL V^ Op.Y �•`. gip. G V.` N■Mkn ma's P �ENM ^�.Y.rS.: .ate.-✓ .�c -q' rz. gji 'cCC*. aoH� yY2�H - ^p5�«Ax 4L'S.. � � �a•� H� q G aO2y il,yG LO Y T qQ q^y\dg c C O U . yq LN�A wyY gOeYV yL� Crpy>O A N4il �y�� ON cM VV �yN em �l6t ��^UV •€\��YY�L�7�. �CAOe..V�� q�Y� t �F�P Yq Ycc$�>gy«. cSl .,eo� $� 3e°J c u LCoo. gYr. '_a`vy La■. 3L"Y.Lciav� XL.z. - PeY p E uSVamEOp«yq vy L C€Y� CI' uE.2zo S g oa. qqt «« VNY�G pp u0iN4TTL'G W LI S O CL-AO} GOCTvr G 4}C ^Y+ps S■MLY e: M^ N� ipN HN VM^6 Wes.i.= O iL. rY N6� PZ O G NI 1•1 fI NI Li G�OG V' �C• OMC 11 iy • G� q C<'+�4V.+p YrO�4M tUa\LS aV^ rsq }. � pPJ�O+�tUV. dY �L OY.MO V N^ qM y■C..S: • + PO. Y=Y y p. E�.b �uy~+.�i. G u G`. q V d ` ■ V G O.+ q} GCS^N L S U W` q ^`� oac Y +enN �. aYK <Yy VNq L p y4 '®■O_ qi M`.2 iSL N b d M C`4Y G ^^ NOV OI.. ram' \...4 C�y•OP = '�C =4 OZI +_a�v 4 MY.E ad O n�. c g :r�y�y^'t[. off $4I1'ie o`��cw■■� V O y71 g$_ �?qc C Va V a� H i _.x %.;.EC N.r'1 "Z'$� O.sA u�"9 -y: =ZVPs aO TG Y tq Y,,GG.L s�V 01 L V{Y qY1y ' �aaa66 pV (( NM myGy' C.S�COL ^4 G t. 4 a Y Y:9 6 .92 w= 4 C■ O yL Y6 e ~ NB 'O�Cq �4 VY _V~= •'�� Nq Cp� CAL OyP�V.^ y4P� YO Yam\+,. C� C ^.SO �M «LCNL C OV 4� O L p % _S H C YC 4'�A UV N O N M r O y 4 N a L Q H C O I. V L e'1 A V Y C G 6 +G G`C p � O Y VG> YNQ O' CC VQ G.3C q a SL pO. ,�^G Sq C t'vgOytu A a4 Ep 4Lac} aqyMeO 24 .2 1 r► YCy pa^� YLOL"x "`•+�'� '. S�E.,�G y N P h-.L N D 4}�UC N�.9 •C V 1�9��:q ii ar� j"..Y y'OM1�4 �.�R�C.V pEL-•_� OL• Y ',y ll qEg 0C Y CO 1•-v O' C V a N P .G1 JC Y - v Z6iV Qf M »O �G NV O'I' -- !CG Y-- M ip9 L. TtL=ip4'C L C �'u 00 q ` 00 O V�, 'r i^O «M. O `_ F w 4 O!.P w 6 0 N Y Lpp O c N N C p ON �^t A L DO 6 b0 Y 4>.M O:. '\ Lt.NC N I• (� wY S L` 4'.VOA p 4LpYY+. L =N^y 0«C! • _ C MC Y.p S.DOYNVAONO OY�AN C • wl�w Cl 'CC"u`.L'i `a'L'o� �Y ab: oww Yp� uv�a�`�ge.u�pa u-�YNCw e,y.:Q�?�. Nry�� Y■ Nz{�- t3 cNaC O pyVO AyM O.N< GL YV 4Y.Y.CYN.gNC CCC C�.4.•~• !q' ♦M ^CCC PC `. yVyO �N's Ny T-•LQ'pq Y.�uuN Y.40 Op jCy Z:u LOI$ 01 Ys. Q V N EC�� Nu O �w Yl0.H w 4 V ML .0°NLY C� wO1 A.a�� N.Gry� �yM�� r°y 1x0;5 Y.LOOY 6s>• c.O M N N 1.lYY tl•�L i•NY a�4C~�ac. n5N AV L� Wy � �Y` OLPa y Y�`'A ^OY C w�:L• � y -LSO M Y C4G aM+n C��`.M p�L NL �9 G��L77 4 C0 aE A MyC Y 1 V 6y 6.--n Dw Ow _Ai1. alp YN YY i1� p O�w �.. C q O Qn N Y^C O O H MOt4 CYO Y`P ^YA` iYb. 'ny .stsi�t �'LN ..-�`�1od�gqoo�y'uy s��ia pCC d` upL' 6NA <N mNO H.Nt aa D . •CN o Y�r.OI>O1AN�P SA-•�6 iY I�o9QN NI f N 1p V a Q .y yy Vpp YC. �4C L. w p^1 GC OIO® iQ��L CVu G a G G Y p u�3 •-c� Ni .-CsP My M' NC YA"M G M.5.5 O: Y6 T pp C !p CO� OtQ 4Y CMG O N.$ YELpL Y` d�W. 4w pO.yy vi. A y�M.r LrC wp�d OV M �N Y GM YM .5 i I` T OwyOj r ^ Y w iD Lt44G iw Q Y p.y�.� g V AYp � F�! AY w aY �`V er yR YT�.O� NC�2Q G<C, y • C Y p4 + •� C C CSV� q} 'Mi �Qa Y.G. S5 Y-4 �.� �..s �y pa y�.• A C.LNM1. w8 r� c 7 oc� No 'a. 4�apaY Y4d qC� p f> V �kz : OP L� zzt P.4 L Y T O M _= C F L Y �� �>K Y Y O Y O RL TT C Y ypyy M Y yPt.Ly P C.� O�Ct G M y 7 C} y C-`.,^ C LLL L a ,at O` pA � C.G:^L �•O Y L V O�'tY�V C DYG. ` pip Cp VY GA QN�� w�AmMw� O YOp OVaL L >LO . �. ■i LV■`� c Y �N O yY D M0 iy��}•A �_Y ypyA pyy Y f .- p-•. V L r�p .- ^' /°FY t c L^Fb O ^�y YLp �. y4 )C1f 4■c y Lis<O l- N-`•ll COO <M A� W�O.M H+°+� �{ C 10 Y N ■YC E isC sY��Y i NN ��n yEy.L�C �li y n ^mac ��'G xc s■ � u'"�r O � c�. _ S' =g� Y Oy 4� r �^4 0 0 0 t� "io vyy" My ' ^�u �vos^ 4Y«i� +N� « �Y 84 j M Qom. V O A OO UU: V. ^C t-'mu p O+ YOB YO+ ay Gu >> 6 U.D C � C+ � y +5 pL fl C I A b y 7.M V a C v a Cq i Y T N r 5 C E O D Y v C M ^ E aY� \SS ^l ` iYL�� u y 2 O. N Y az N� G ►G` y�v O^ MQY aY Cpy 1p .. Wig. N yT �tyy efrs u p .� ■�4G• yp� y{� *��"9L J. u�.fJN �e..�Gp 4N 'g O.NC p. Y Irl +aY C V +.`.D Y �`.7 K Q��: 41NT` �. Luq' 4 u` Na �[ Ywyy YmO N L VSI G� ■G WyW 9.`= Y Y Y L r D Y w•T l qCC�``. i G, id Y tt 00 4 f M 4 Cyu C 6 Y i `. Q�nQA 1_�6M 3..L:ILL'v!AL HVn v-R �oa4vl fnw.0 N. YL N i N ti YIs .` &2 LIE ^.7 p Ol � rho ".`� Wiz= '�� � €�tc .�• �>s � �� !y'S N Spyy �Xo .� _gp y`S', 4 C' o, L:i ■L y .Y.N� vM4 '3.'ri os �.y� 8PS'Yj N E (4p�....LyyyyC Y w4pNv � N'�dE Y N "sY O.■01 d "L i� Ni�tN " . C V Di MN OY l^.' p L4 V e ✓' O.M L a rd N Y y L i C r� c L P `s N«�,1 y r a s,= oyo'�s u. un ..`x.332 M c c aaa .c p u ,e >N «..:a " + " " O a\.CY _�"D i9Vp. . C n N Y O� ^ OCC G� C� C S yam. Z. etGZZ Y c c.o u y p Lc"nouw. itS N w � 4 �y V � V y �+qa9 Y y C C NOSY C 9 p � Z.■d. � q � V _L Al N L'C LA O v JCL YM p4 L Y +p TO �P q�N O q�9 4.C C ~ �■aN �C .� Y �4:a 9. y�. V N N V c.yQC Y. L w M T OI V D C$6.R. C?r.V YQp L O O O Oti y Q �. N C aka C V T9 yNy Y N Y ya. i N p1-YS-'O^ co. C RN �d A2: N� �e Y a d u N{ 0. u 4C C y p p g v.�= LL ^ M C y q V L 0 �� ^�Y.o ra1 LH., L O� O ; � Z 1i m,Cy you VOOr ti. C Y uTa.=4 u. 11 �aa�»cy..: V al y 9LDS 90. 1 I bn L. iN Kr�M� 69 00► p� o. roiliYrliVOP!\ - C� n5c Y S y 55 - _V7 1 y0 � OY OIa � A yogi^C V��G ylusr � 'Y. O Y? ^ �.V^r Wq YO � �V601� 9G�46p VVGyyV�bl d.^ is �� w uqe: @ o.uM Yn '► a.. Vfn 4 �.� c$=^ ,w YL VD yyy.'g wQ..G, �.Y OM.is `OO�y T y ^CI O V A C$ Y L'Y V.P 0 �R �Y p ■p H O V n� D 6 p.q�a q; cG V L 0.6 L O 0 p �O VYgi N Q C O� C��✓' yC. yi. r� Gnu a °� Wit$ �■ Y ` R. Y+�. VyO-i ■C O q.b C iL 6 4.. L pO d Lp' u�V C O C O. `O ■ N C L aLd �. UOr kt-Ez V61 yC ZOCC L „r 9q:CN �¢ Miy�l{ Vayvw y.V �.M q ''� ytl4Y 60 D11 O..o� �A G~ Z. qqY 6Y1` �LVj7� Li1�eQnp �u�cq_'u �.�. ooY .c...+. a v YqC �sog Nq ISOOSN� YOE= eed VG.sV ni Ni tlTC>O Yw9s� LN. f( _ OV qq d Ytl tJ9~` Orr '.iOj P n�. •� MPC^'O rutl aCON4 w.G Nyi r-0�� V uqe-. o" K.; ve �C L aLdd yp4O WNC WUti �a r:J-.i 6a (N YGmiil 6VNY M� ! q � y J� pppG Y a „upx asa zoAa c =du �Y: a A' mW Ln 4 alitc S uS 15 _oai a`u aaa ce o.6-0 LC W NEI O.�C � V� dYWOtN � .sty V■` Vd d +CW �.a ' Rf.4'tYV tlL WttC _ N aO.aa A 4 ♦b• O OJ LLq gN..0 C LO M®a C p �V 1 �.. d p •� W ��6Y Ji A9N ! tiu S u�u� p� l�AG �G �r np yppnpi.�� NC uq a•�, y u,q O Yup U d.C• d.A• L LNi.1 Y �'�. LV W. IIN YC EO war mr 6. v'C ip Y'c, O 4 a e-p p °� u v... •pia u O { Yi 4 • � Qom• a.V =qW y4 Y.+�NNp `« ca g LE �73 LE dYt • �4 A � Yt V x 9g y N r`1( Sr p0 NS "Ps CCYv M }«.N TPs "CCl.O' ^� f� '6 N'�•L NFU 4C. � Y�� �C� CW~.ate "�: G O ■ C 2U2w C. al G9 ^ � n• O r � � `� h0 L 9-L W Y L _H SNS i V•4 4 L t2 � ^�V 0 N W N 6:Nt:`� yiy .s 1 O Y O. -o 'I yy I � �nC9N e S. 46q l��p.. W > y I .7r qywL qN V G.O V l Ca O O C Z. G?. yCy IS O1Y UC a+.�r� p V�Y C '4x yZ« CSL G�r SL �..� Y1gYn y.SW 0. UC' v lVY LU M> xtJ.. �1 tc.i ay, y.a .5 Z. Usa � i6. ~•� Yy �00C CII .�yY9.` �,> n�n ^.J Y� C�.:YO 040. O.{pp�� - ! C GCi NCOO f xO,LY� 00 �aax ��.x L w• �� OY .d:Y Y$ —pp C a p- Y T e�Q" C M y U U L. p.. O • , NM■ = N t a+Y 7..� .... Zia. O m N G .y 4-un mom SDI ca� �•� \ASl `) ;N F. _ o - y :-WATT INT.ND EMP=.INC, 9435 HAVEN.AVE..BLD.2.STE.1O2 Al 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 9'-73D _ March. 15.':'1931. M 4)989.5663+FAX(7141 944.9868 ` City of Rancho Cucamonga a� 10500 Civ ;c Center 'Drive Rancho ra4.amonga, Ca.. .9173.0 Dan :i ames Dear Dan, X received the Staff Report for ;our Modification to Tentative Tract 13527, dated March 27, 1991. The is ort seems to be fair and complete at li,tfis time. I understand this c-andtion wilt: be add.,,gd to our Tract and that it will not replace Conditions j10, or 11. I also want to confirm our further discussion of Condition 411 in which you agreed that tie plans we are currently processing shrough the City wi,-U, w.zen approved, meet Condition Ill and allow the recordation of our final map and/or issuance of building permits. "'This p2-n shows the Temporary onsite basins which will outl�L South of 24th ,)Street into Etiwanda Creek j ,Your expediance in working with me on this asue has been greatly appreciated. Please do not hss ta..a to call me if you have ar questions. Sincerely, ••. Tiof Development cc: Steve Yabel 111 Tamar Stein Steve Stewart I" r� A WATT ENTERPRISES COMPANY - I PLANNIMG-"O MISSI AESOLUTION'No. 88-200 TT 13527 - Melcher September 28, 1488 Page 4 ij L. b' A temporary road easement shall be provided an lot 11. e) A fee for ''the future removal of the temporary transition and its replacement with ultimate street improvements shall be tpaid to the City prior to approval of the Final Map -! i� 9 If off-$ite' dedication is obtained from the property owner to the north prior to approval of the Final Map, ',then this developer shall construct the ultimate Etiwanda Avenue north of the project site to its convergence `i,)ith the existing alignment. It shall be constructed ful'�, width, excluding parkway improvements." the !developer may'�request a reimbursement agreement to re6 ver the cot of constructing off-site street' improvements from `'future development as it occurs north of this site. �eO. Construct the City Master Plan Storm grain in 24th Street om the project site to the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds, f andard drainage fees- for the site shall be credited to at portion' of the construction costs incurred in nstructing permanent drainage facilities specified on the ,Vty's Master Plan of storm drains and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursementof allowable costs in excess of the fees in accordance',,with City policy. Any additional costs for over-sizing " facilities for interim- flood protection shall-be borne by the jeveloper. 4i. Plans for the 24th Street Master Plan, Stone Drain shad be approved by the Cite Engineer and the Rood Control District prior to approval of the Final Map or i'suance of huil'ding permits, whichever occurs first. .I 12. The storm drain system within the project shall be designed i to accommodate flows from the property to the north upon Its future development in accordance with designated tributary areas for the 24th Street Master +)lan storm f drain. 13. A permanent flood protection facility shall be constructed along the west property boundary as follows: a) A concrete channel shall be constructed,.as justified by the final drainage study approved by the City Engineer, with sufficient capacity to allow extension of the channel along the northwest property line of the property to the north. It shall be fenced per City'Standards. b) A 12-foot wide paved access road ,shall be provided or CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA STAFF REPORT ^ DATE: March 27, 1991 TO: Chair•mar, and Members of the Plann-mg Commission FROM: Dan dames, Senior Civil Engineer SUB-?ECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ►:1DIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT IRE'—request to mo y� the map to a +ow a temporary on-site e en on'ba in of approximately 170,009 square feet for an approved tentative tract map of 201 single family lots r,.a 51.6 acres of Land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling rLnits ,per acre), located north of 24th Street and west of Etiwanda Avenue APN: 225-071-65. Staff recommends issuance of a NegGtive Decl arati_o. T. BACKGROUND: i Commission on 4 Te��.ative r'ract 13527 was approved b1 the P1.^nning Ii Septembe- 28, IN8. Design Reviews ea'the first four of five project phases were approved by the Planning Comissio�i on September 26i 1990. AOL The Developer is requesting that he be allowed to construct a temporary on-site detention basin to remain until such tine that he is allowed to construct more permanent detention, facilities within the Etiwanda Creek Spreading Grounds. His request letter is attached fcr yoar reference. II. ANALYSIS• ` All projects which drain to Etiwanda Creek, as does this tract, are required to provide detention acilities to mitigate increased flows caused by the development. Tentative Tract 13527 was approved based uron ' a letter from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD3 stating that they did not object to the concept of an interim detention basin within the Etiwanda Creek spreading agroends, subject to approval, of the Department of Fish and Game. The project has now progressed to the improvement ,plan cha,�k phase. However, the Developer has not been aoie<'to obtain permission`to complete the detention basin plans, because the SBCFCO has not yet received approval from Fish and Game for work within toe spreading grounds. Optimistically, the plans could be completed and ap-prrrved within 14 months, but could take longer. Taerefore the Developer is now requesting that he be allowed to construct a temporary 'on-site detention basin to � F,- remain until such time that the detention facilities within the Etiwanda Creek spreading grounds are allowed. TTESI G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE w- MARCH 27, 1991 ` PAGE Z The on-site basin, as proposed ,by the Developer, is shown- on Exhibit "C". The actual size and shape is subject to further detailed review. St;ff is sympathetic to the coecept of the Devetoper°s requezt, because he' is subject to restrictions beyond his cGntrol, which could •have potential legal implications. kith that in mind,> staff has prepare] a resolution of approval for the request. The resolution contains a 9 condition allowing the requested temporary on-site detention+ basin,._but 9I ass%,41:g its removes upon completion of the basin within the spreaaing grounds. Also, a condition has been Included that -equires ,gcreening..and landscaping of the temporary on-site,basins subject to the approval of thi,,Design Review Committee. 1t is noted that staff ca�uld not accent the revised conditions as.., presented by the Developer,'"because they appear to go beyia d what we considered to be the understanding worked but E-,tween;the Developer and staff at several meetings. Staff feels that the'conditiuns'contained in the resolution will provide the Oeveloper ade-lualte flexibilit,, to i accomplish his goal and at the sane time provide sufficient Protr:?ction for the City. I11. RECOMMENDATION; It is recomnendsd that the Planning Commission consider` all input and elemerits of the regcested modification. ' -If after such consideration, the Commi^sion ian recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resol'ation and issuance of:a Negative Declaration mould be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, f� : ,( Dan James Senior Civil Engineer DJ:jh Attachments: Letter of Request for Modification Vicinity 4ap (Exhibit "A") Tentative Map (Exhibit "B") Temporary On-wSite Detention Basfn Plan ,'Exhibit "C") R2sdiut4on and Recommended Conditions of Approval, j v WATT INLAND ExJpI72E, INC. 9035 HAVEN AVE,SLO 2.STE 102 RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA 91730 17t41 9e9.5663 FAX 17147 944.566e February 27, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Planning Department Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: JUETTFICATION FOR MINOR MODIFICATION Watt Inland Empire, Inc. ("Watt") has been processing through the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") Tentative Tract Map, No. 13527, which is comprised of Final Tract Map Nos. 14379, 14380, 14381, 14382 and 13527. Watt has made a good faith effort to work diligently in the comply processing to this Tentative Tract Map and to p y with its conditions of approval (adopted by City's Resolution Nos. 88-200 and 90-119) able to satisfy most the conditi , is unable to satisfy two o Watt ns of the conditions.of approval. However' Condition No. 10, requires Watt to "Construct tl:•' City Master Plan Storm Drain in 24th Street from the project site to the Et Wanda Spreading Grounds.,, The 24th Street Drain and the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds are located out of the City's limits, and are not owned by either Watt nor the City. The location shown for the interim detentio"i basin in the City's Master Plan of Drainage is located in an area that is not owned by Watt or the City. I addition, a number of other governmental regulatory agencies which have Jurisdiction over the area, have not approved the City's Master Drain, d'jltention basins, and the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds and will not allow us to complete our plan approvals. Therefore, the City cannot provide Watt with the ability to comply wilt. Condition No. 10. Watt has proposed a number of alternative solutions in an effort to satisfy Condition *10. First, Watt has proposed the installation of a temporary on-site detention basin to allow development to Proceed pending approval of the regional flood facilities, including the :.4th StreetPermanent ood control 8i Spreading Grounds. Drain and the EtiWanda the San Bernardino County temporary>< o d design Control will Distr tit a approval d a; Metropolitan 'hater District.. Qs well as Section 66462, as well as Sections s16u36-02veb and 1636 29D of d by Government theCity's Code, Watt has Offered to Winter into an agreement with the City to assure Watt's necessary Performance of Condition No. 10 when the Y Property interests and regulatory approvals are The proposed temporary basin granted. would ncit effect a Physical configuration Of the Final Tract Map No. 13527 and thus would not ( . necessitate a map modification. ACM As a second alternative, Watt has "suggested that the City issue grading permits without requiring the Z,�;zal erainage and improvement plans for the 24th Street Drain. Wait :has even offered to post a reasonable bond to assure that the grading will conform U to the design of the final plans, including the regional flood control facilities. That is, even if theultimate design of the 24th Street Drain is inconsistent with the grading performed, the City would have security that the grading would be adjusted. If a solution is not reached, Watt W11 1 1 have no-choice but to ask that the City allow t2,e issuance of the grading permit and filing Of the final maps pursuant to Government Code Section 66462.5: "A City . shall not postpone or refuse approval of a final map because the subdivider has failed to meet a tentative map condition which requires the subdivider to construct or install offsite improvements on land In which neit._�r the subdivider nor the local agency has suffix^^.ent •.'y title or interest, including an easement or license, t%e time the,; tentative or final map is filed with the local agency, to permit the improvements to.be made. In such cases, the City shall, within 120 days of the filing .of the final map acquire an interest in the land which will permit the Improvements to be made i In the event a City fails to meet the 120-day time limitation, the condition for the construction of offsite improvements shall be concl�sitely deemed to be wasved. Based on recent meetings with Engineering, tbo Community Development DirectcT .and for a legal view point, the C!ty legal staff. It was decided the beat way to resolve the issue would be a minor modification. Sincerely, WATT RNTERPRaSES Watt Inland Empie, Inc. Larry Lewis Dir"tor of Development �r COX, CASTLE £6 NICHOLSON A.PARTNCRSNIP WCLUOING PPOICSSIONAI CORPORATIOIS IWILLIF a Ic OLSo.. a—. ,.rN.Isitwaiw. LAWYERS � RC Q YTn"4 STC[ A.JUNG OI C sca LQ I.SILVIIINAN• Q..... J.RAN., 20.fl CCNTV RT PAR.EAST I C...D COI' LAC 0 C StL[ CN Q 1]NAPIRO A R.a.S M TWENTY-EIGNTN FLOOR LAwPC CC J TPACY• AR10 CANARA. bwNOAAC.]TLWANT N[LIN UNCS. OCORGG O.CAIRINS,N O•acOTT TUANLR LOS ANGCLES.CALIFORNIA 9006T JA CS c,.....Ell JO YNL soots c.OLic"Ac NOwANR a3LQsicIN L11P C 1Nt StcIN OC.ORAN 0..tNONP]a TELEPHONE 12131 2"Y N222 PCR.Y O.NQCCIA.0 T U O SP U 01NG,J.. ILL JASICR ANOC.SON "..t,N.GRYCM.nUN �Y JC/RCT"POT _! !A J./ACYNOUCN !tn O O ,LLIPLIGCR CAROL L PATSYNAW. FACSIMILE 12131 277•TBCfl ORI MGC COYNT OI/FCC ,a..5..1llLP,.1.. RCNNCTN w LL1AN2 .. PCNNCTN a.of SUSA.J.JAC.SON I.soo N.LARTNU.soule..RO A J..ww .A. NICNACL J.NANINaRT SYITC ROO JO N I,NIC"o"o. TNRTN N.LTPOAN C .LLS C.NONCNAN CA ]..R 0S/N6CN6 DIVINE,CAVIO....i31`5 wILL1AN uNCR. 4'A.1A A.Ri11A1 RIAt.76•2111 NA.LCNC O.GOOOI.ICO NIC.Atl 1.TIOLIS,' U13/ZN•ZI.T R a.....3Al.— [N[ .A.._.AN' 0A.RT R JAlLON .RA..C. 7ebruary 28, 1991 JCII.Ct O.YAStLR3 �-SOLUAs - ROSCRT O.INICVs[ ADAN C'"GROSSNAM OUR FILC.No t.w G.S.I.L-. a ATNI G.NA.COPULOS o-OICI G.)RAIICA N.YA..LLP$tL 19854 co-,.C.3.G .MIRY C.tAcTON COnNC L.•AONSTON 4SA h 3Tt.C! CAROL N,lI1 JANC S.TNONASSCN - WRITCR'S OIRECT OIAI.NUMBER o OUGLAa K SNTOCA OIANC C.I.$..... JONN R.CAUILC.JR. ANORCw C.ZO.LCR `:As'A.G,cN 5,on Q.sRooR3 - - 213/28 1-2248 LORw L[C LIOONC JONN G CONOAl. 1-1.a,ICLO A. ALIN.ALIR PCTCR I.-A I JCAN F.NURNCLL K JLPOLO 4'ALo. SNARON.L.TANITA NR.R..CLANATIIAN ROS]'a..VINCC.TI JD N h IUMCANNON ANT N.wtLta 31 NLCI w.".PORT RO.t.T I st.uN RA DALL w.OLACR NITCNCLL 1.LURGCR NCN.C.T J.NLC1N AORICNNC TV".RENIOR CTNTNIA R.Us"" NAIW.A.RCZAC JCSS A.s.cS31 Mc Rick Gomez AANL City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Watt Inland ,Empire., Inc. - Tentative Traci. Map No. 13527 (Consisting of Tentative Map Nos. 14379, 14380, 14181, 14382, and 13527),t Condition Numbers 10 and 11 Dear Mr. Gomez: As discussed during our meeting on February 20, 1991, enclosed please find our client's application for modification of condition numbers 10 and 11 imposed by the City's Resolution No. 88-200 on the above-referenced Tentative Tract Map. As you know, this application is submitted with the understanding that the Planning Commission will act on the application on March 27, 1991, that only Conditions 10 and l! are the subject of the application, and that the map will not otherwise be reopened, it is also our expectation that the City will adopt a negative, declaration with respect to this application. Watt Inland reserves the rlight to withdraw this application and makes the application without prejudice to any right or remedy it may have. - lr v y` Mr. Rick Gomez February 28, 1991 Page 2 In advance, thank you for your priority a'.ttention to this )natter and for your continuing ,courte,y. of course, if I can be-, of any further aa-dstance, please ft;e_ free to call. Very truly yours, " !3 Tamar C. Stein CKR/klh Encl. IA92012Dd1P0 cc: James L. Markman, Esq. Mr. Joe O'Neil, City EngineerAft I, r f I , I _ FS f ,J 10:.. Upon recordation of the first Final Map for the Tentative Tract,C Developer shall file, in its discretion, a cash deposit, letter of credit or band, in a: form suitable to and approved by the City Attorney and City F 4ineer, in the amount cff $ as and for security for its pre rata share of the cost of constructing the 24th street Drain.. Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall, at its option, either constru-.t the City Master Plan storm drain in 24th street from the Project Site to the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds (the 1124th Street Drain") , or pay in-lieu fees there£o;c as required by the. City or the Flood Control District. Upon completion of the 24th St.:-ee. Prz:in or payment of in-lieu fees, the City shall promptly release and exonerate the security filed pursuant to this paragraph. In thetea'ent that enyix=mental permits or any other rega- red governmental authorization for construction of the City Master Plan Storm Drainage Facilities have not been issued to the City or the County of San Bernardino, Developer { shall construct a temporary outlet from the 24th Street Drain to the existing channel within the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds. Upon completion of the 24th Street Drain to the temporary outlet, the City shall promptly release the security filed pursuant tothe previous paragraph and Developer shall substitute, in its discretion, a cash deposit, letter of credit or Fond, in a form suitable to and approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer, in the amount of $ as and for security for the cost of removing the temporary outlet and constructing the permanent -, ? outlet from the 24th Street Drain. Upon issuance / of, and in accordance with, the environmental permits and any other required governmental r% authorization for constructio of Master' Plan Storm Drainage Facilities Developer shall remove the temporary outlet dj;aribed above and install the permanent outlet from the 24th Street Drain to the permanent retention basin within the Wwanda Spreading Grounds. Upon completion of r%moval of the temporary outlet and construction of the permanent outlet fron the 24th Street Drain, the city shall promptly release the security filed pursuant to this Paragraph. Standard drainage fees for the Site shall be credited to that portion of the construct_*,on costs incurred in construrting permanent drainage facilities specified on the City's Master Plan"of storm drains, and the developer shall be G- i reimbursed for allowable costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City policy. Any additional casts for over-sizing facilities for iltterim flood protection shall be borne by the developer. ; t s 11. In the event that t�.-�•r.rmanent retention basin : within the M1wanda Spreading Grounds is rot -v constima ed and operating, upon issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, Developer shall (a) construct a temporary detention basin within the subdivision, and (b) file, at Developerl.s option, either a cash deposit, letter of credit, or bond (in a form suitable to and approved by the city Attoraay'and City Engineer)`in an amount of as security for the cast of abandoning the temporary detention .basin. Any costs for the temporary de:;=ention basin. shall..be borne by the developer. A'maintenance agreement shall be executed to the s:tzfaction of the. City Engineer and the Cit}c)Attornw guaraWt,.ieing private maintenance of the temporary detention basin by the landowner or ovie:e entity approved by the City Engineer and City 2��orney, but providing the City with the right of a z,jss to.maintain the temporary detention basin if pri:tpwte maintenance is insufficient &zd allowing th�,City to assess 'those costs to the landowner or 'wither'entity. After the 24th Street Drain and the p^rmanent retention basin within th s Etiwanda Spreading Grounds are constructed and operating, Developer shall-remove the temporary detention basin and 4hereafter may immediately reclaim the lots encompassed by the temporary detention basin and be entitled to iasuasjccs -)f build-'n5 rarmits 'to develop them in accordance with the IUpon completion of removal c the temporary,` on-site '( retention basin, the City shall promptly release the security filed pursuant t; thiz Conditien. I cr,��ysasz�-szaazs.o WATT INLI k D'r.NIPIRE, ING } 9035 HAVEN AVE.SLO 2 STE 102 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 17141 989.5663.PAX 17141 S44.5868 III February 27, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dlaaning Department Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Beverly Nissen RE: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS 88--200, TRACTS 13527, 14379, 14381, 14382 Dear Beverly: ?lease accept this application for a Minor Modification to our conditions of Approval. I appreciate all your help in the expeditiocya processingF of :this application. I will deliver the radius map, mailing 3x•se19 ,revised tract map and the 8 1/2 X 11 reduction an Monday, Ma ch 4th. The reasons which .'cake this :codification neceasary is attached to the application as the Justification. I have beezr;workin.7 with several Governmental Agencies, Rick Gomez, Joe O'Neil, Jim Markman-, and a substantial number of other people have been involved in helping to resolve this problem 1 understand this application will be on the Planning Commission Agenda March 27, 1991. Thank you for your continuing courtesy. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or need any additional information. SiY;cerely, WA'?. INDUSTP,!ES Watt T ;a Empire, Inc. rry ewis r G , Ire r o o} Development LLcle- y A WATT ENTERPRISES COMPANY PART I City of Rancho Uniform Cucamonga Application .. .oN FILE NO. ? iliIdERAL INFORMATION R!e®u8F1En1 225-071-S5_ ® NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT RELATC.. !'1i Limited Edition Wa_t Homes 2 XCATIO11 OF PROJECT(ADDRESS) > TT 14379, 14380, 14381,' 13527', 14382 0 APPLICANTS NAME TELEPHONE Watt Inland Empire, Inc. 714/989-5663 ADDRESS z 9035 Faven Ave, #102, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE same z AbORESS - i REV!!-�%-V REQUESTED ' Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* ❑ TECHNICAL/DESIGN REVIEW I ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL* NON CONSTRUCTION* ❑ TECHNICALIDESIGN REVIEW— z ri DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT RESIDENTIAL* LL! (ZONE CHANGE) ❑ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT Ana ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ BASIC STANDARDS ❑ OPTIONAL STANDARDS MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ❑ CUSTOM LOT/SUBDIVISION -1 ❑ MINOR EXCEPTION ❑ DESIGN REVIEW(REAPPLICATION) W l ❑ PRELIMINARY REVIEW* ❑ VARIANCE LU ❑ ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ *It is mandatory to complete Part 1&11 of the Uniform Application PROJECT DESCRIPTION r FU'L DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT IATTACH_ADCITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) Minor modification to 88-2.00 Resolution Items #5A10, and 5A11 to allow o installation of a temporary onsite retention basin as an alternate V solution as to waiving entire condition LLe I ® !Justification: See attached s OWNER CERTIFICATION t Z LU 1 CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER,I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE I ABOVE INcORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.AGENT OF OWNER MUST ATTACH A LET;'ER OF q i AUTHOR'.,1ATION FROM THE LEGAL OWNER. QL7.. DATE 2-26-91 SIGNATURE: PRINT NAME&TITLE: _Stew . Ka el - President L UA'E REC 0 RECEIVED BY F s : } FEES RECEIVED RE City of Rancho PAIN a UNiFO► rm'APPLICATION ulcoa1 onga RESIDENTIAL PROJEC SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT TABLOW IProject N am e. f :?7Pger"s/a3?g,143iio, 143811l4 2�l3SZ-7 Reference File No.: Location :Gr:.we *f rrr.-e�j (Staff Use Only) General Plan Y Development District PROJECT AREA Gross(inch.area to centerline of abutting streets): acres 9�7 I! Net(exclusive of dedication for major external and secondary streets): acres o p r- DWELLING UNITS(Based on Not Area) NUMBER NET t ENSITY Single Family Detached Z, r l Single Family Attached/Townhouse/Duplex Condominium Apartments wk Total z.3 AREA (DISTRIBUTION(Based on Not And ACRESISO.FT. %OF MET AREA Building Coverage I Landscape Coverage Vehicular Area(incl.parking) Common Open Space Private Open Space Useable Open Space(common$private) 4 I! PARKING LIST OR AMENITIES N Of Spacss Uncovered j Carports L Garages --3 c Are: cA�vz z 3 1 Guest Parking Recreation Vehicles Am Total: '231 IRatio(Space/Unit): _a 9 h ' xy� 3 A 1 � _ i i:i�Ills� '� iwsl lr■ Y I1111111 ►® ,� IIIIER 1111111�►I/! Minn No �ro��®1'lu'®It►� — �� ••: 11t11/ Q uutnsusur'� w`�- • \ Y el a n a w t A •• w , ` o w i' 1 II M _ I 1. CITY OF •Mom.-r`o !35 � RANCHO CUCA t3NGA. 7TmL- 6fr2, vw le i fit! GAG DOT 1 V` ► �►� mu � , �w�. D��lllti�l�`ljil4 1�ni■■®ie■.rr '' f . n f � _ �>R RESOLUTION NO. A-RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MAP MODIFICATION TO ALLOW A TEMPORARY ON-SITE DETENTION BASIN OF APPROXIMATELY 170,000 SQUARE .FEET FOR APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13527 OF 201 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 51.6 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2- 4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)', LOCATED NORTH OF 24TH STREET AND WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-071-65 A. Recitals, (i) On September 28, 1988, The Planning' ,Commission adapted Resolution No. 88-200, thereby epproving, subject to specified conditions, Tentative Tract 13527. (ii) On February 28, 1991, a request was filed by,Watt Inland`;Empire,. Incorporated, to modify the Tentative Map to allow a temporary on-site detention basin. (iii) .The request resulted frLiA comments from the San Bernardino County Flood -Control District regarding drainage into the Etiwanda Creek Spreading Grounds. (iv) On March 27, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said bearing on that date. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have oct_.�rred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 27, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The modification request applies to property located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street within the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre); and C _1b PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO- TT 23527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE MARCH 27, 1991 PAGE 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is Low Residential with an approved tentative tract 14139 (vacant), the-property' to the south of that site is designated Very Law Residential and, is a partially constructed tract 12659, the property to the east is County zoned R-2 and is vacant, and the property to the west is designated for over, space uses and is presently vacant. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of factsset forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the previously approved tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Davelopmant Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is;physically suitable for the type of developmsnt proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damago and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract modification iit not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict ;with f` any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby,,, rinds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative i Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the modification application subject to each and every condition set forth below. PlackaS'a Divisions (1) The proposed on-site detention basin shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee for landscaping and screening issues prior to the issuance of building permits for any phase of Tentative Tract 13527. -f7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION,NO. TT 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE MARCH 27, 1991 PAGE 3 VW (2) PursuaW. to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 11089 (b), this application chall not *a operative, vented c." final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Dehermination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt_rhowing that all fees have been paid. Ifi the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game code, or the guidelivas promulgate'thereunder, encept for ,payment of any required handling 6 is for filing a Certificate :,of Fee Exemption, this. conditiL,_,%shall' be deemed null and void. Engineering Divisions (1) The design of the temporary on-site detention facilities shat'l, be justified by a fin$: drainage rep3rt and approved by the City Engineer. - These temporary detention facilities are to remain until such time As drainage/detention facilities may be constructed within the San Bernardino, ';ounty Flood Control District Etiwarde. Creek Sn-eading Grounds-. Upon authorization of the Flood Control District allowing the commencement of design and construction, 'the Developer shall diligently pursue approval of design and construction of drainage/detention facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The temporary on-site detention facilities shall be regraded to accommodate the subdivision immediately upon completion and acceptance of the drainage/detention facilities. within the Etiwanda Creek 'Spreading Grounds. An agreement shall be executed .and security posted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Att-zney guaranteeing: (a) private maintenance of the temporary detention facilities, but providing the City with the right-of-accene to maintain the facility if the private maintenance is insufficient and allowing the City a means to recoup ties cost, (b) the design and construction of the neces3ary drainage/detention facilities within the Flood Control District Etiwanda Spreading Grounds, (c) the design and construction of the permanent outlet from the.24th Street..Drain into the Flood Control District Etiwanda Spreading Grounds, and (d) regrading of the temporary detention facilities. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. TT 13S27 - W-TT INLAND EMPIRE MARCH 27, 19S1 PAGE 4 � 6. The SecretHlg;�Q this Commission shall certify, to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTER THIS 27TLI DAY OF MARCH 1991. i PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA BY; I Larry T. MCNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller,, Secretary i I T, Brad Huller, Secretary of the Planning Commieston of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ce.`tify that the foregosna.,Resolut ^ti _was duly and regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plvr,f:ng Coasion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 217th day of March 1y91, by the following not.4-to-wi!tz AYES: COMMISSIONERS: :J NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS: - AIML i CITY OF RAN,CJ O cucAmONGA STAFF REPORT 1r DATE: March 27, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 14139 - AHRANSON DEVELOPMENT - A request o modify the map 15 allow a temporary 'on-site etent on asin of approximately 56,000 square feet located on Lots 1-5 for an approved tentative tract map of 119 single family lots on 54 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 25th Street - APNs 225-082-01. Staff recommends issuance of a idegative Declaration. I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 14139 was approved by the Planning Commission on July 12, 1989• Design Reviews for houses on the lots have not-yet been submitted to the City for review. This modification request is virtually_ttie, same as for Tentative Tract 13527,on tonights agenda, This Tract,-."iJ ocatgd to the north of Tract 13527 and will use the same storm drain system. As with Tract 13527, the Developer is requesting that he be allowed to construct temporary on-site detention facilities to remain` until such time that he is allowed to construct more permanent detention facilities within the Etiwanda Creek Spreading Grounds. His request letter is attached .for your reference. II ANALYSIS: All projt is which drain to Etiwanda Creek, as does this tract, are required to provide detention facilities to mitigate increased flows caused by the development. -Tentative Tract 14139 was approved based upon a letter from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) stating that they did not object to the concept of an interim detention basin within the Etiwanda Creek spreading grounds, subject to approval df the Department of Fish and Game. The prftiect has now progressed to the improvement plan check phase-, However, the Developer has not been able to obtain permission;;to compl ote 3' the detention basin plans, because the SBCFCD has not yet rsceived " approval from Fish and Game for work within the spreading grounds. Optimistically, the plans could be completed and approved within 14 x�_z x PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14139 AHMANSON DEVELOPMENT MARCH 27, 1991 PAGE` 2 months, but could take longer. TherefOle the Developer is now requesting that he be allowed to construct a temporary on-site detention basin to remain until such time that the detention facilities within the Etiw2nda Creek spreading grounds are allowed. The on-site basin, as proposed by the Developer, is shown on Exhibit "C". The actual size and shape is subject to further detailed review. Staff is sympathetic to the concept of the DevJ0 oper`s request, because he is subject to restrictions beyond his cphtrol, which could have pctential legal implications. With that in ejind, staff has prepared a resolution of approval 'for the request. The resolution contains a condition allowing the requested. temporary on-site detention basin, but assu-ing its removal upon completion of the basin within,the spreading grounds. Also, a conditiont'las been included that requires screening and. landscaping of the temporary on,-site basins subject to the approval of the Design Review Committee. It is noted that staff could "not accept the revised;,'con,4;'ions as presented by the Developer, �,s'�ause they appear to go oeyond what we considered to be the understanding worked out between the Developer and staff at several meetings. Staff feels that the conditions contained in the resolution will provide the Developer adequate flexibility to accomplish his goal and at the„same time provide sufficient protection for the City. III. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all Input`anF elements of the requested modification. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption '-of the attached Resolution .and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Dan James Senior Civil Engineer DJ:jh Attachments: Letter of Request for Modification Vicinity Map (Exhibit 'A") Tentative Map (Exhibit "B") Temporary On-Site Detention Basin Plan (Exhibit "C") Resolution and r' Recr=ended Conditions of Approval HAMILTON s*SAMUEL$' 'wTPAUL R.MAMILYON M{'.;b ERT N.SAMUELS 4000.M.CARTMUR 60ULEVARD,5UlTF.6700� TELEPN ON E.4T141.T52-£0D0 K.yAA'N-" LE.E N'SWPORT 88AC$.:CALIPORN2A B&66Q FACSIMtI.E;1]141 4T0,•6i10 WICLI4M L..'STEEL _ JEFFREY S,GRIDER - _ .. . RMILI P W.GREEN RALPH R.MA2.UREK OUR,FILE.NUMOCR, WILFRED O.KNOTTNERUS KARIN L.SORCItiARO E a GRAN M.ROSENTMAL -xE0 N.PURCELL . 2O9bQ.Z8?. MARK S.ADAMS March. 1, 1.99, "RC s.NINES -HARON L.JACOpSON 40NA'TNA.N 8.CRAN^ " ,t CYNTNIA R.URMER SJ Air. Rick'Gomez Community Development Director City of Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Aiodifiration of cond;tjon�13g�, 8Cc1 aDa 9 3n Tentative mv-m-- stir-„ •r s Dear Rick. On behalf of our client, Ahmanson Developments, Inc, ("Ahmanson"), enclosed please find an application for modification of Condition Numbers 8(c) and 9 in Tentative Tract Map No. 14139, together with proposed modifications. As discussed during our meeting of 'February 20, 1991, this application is submitted with the understanding that the Planning Commission will act on it on March 27, 1991, that the application only relates to Condition Numbers 8(c) and 9, and that the Map will not otherwise be reopened; it is also our expectation ti `ir,-, _ the City will adopt a negative declaration with respect to this application. Ahmanson reserves the right to withdraw this application and makes the applicatiion without prejudice to any right or remedy it might have under the current Tentative Tract Map and existing conditioner, including, but trot limited to, rights to challenge application of the conditions or to proceed without satisfying the conditions in accordance with law. � i Mr. Rick Gomez March 1, 1991 Page 2 We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and ,your, continuing courtesy. if ve can be-of any further assistance:, please call. Very truly yours, r Deborah M. Rosenthal DMR:mae DR\lTR\eranaod.�lr cc: Mr. Craig Page James L. Markman,_,Zscj., Mr. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Tamar C. Stein, Esq. ,1 i Amh Ask $, (c) Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall, at it.1 option, either construct the City Master Plan storm Drain in and under 24th Street from the Project site to the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds (the "24th Street Grain!°), or pay in-lieu fees therefor as required by the City or the San Bernardino county Flood Control District. Upon recordation of the final Map for the Tentative Tract, Developer shall mile, in its sole discretion, a cash deposit, letter of credit,mr bond, in a form acceptable to and approved by the City Attor%_y and City Engineer, in the amount of $ as and for security for its pro rata share of the cost of constructing the 24th Street Drain. Upon completion of the 24th Street Drain or payment of in-lieu fees, the city shall promptly release and exonerate the security filed pursuant to this paragraph. In the event that environmental permits or any other required governmental authorization for construction of the City Master Plan Storm Drainage Favilities have not been issued to the City or the County of San Bernardino prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall construct a temporary outlet from the 24th Street Drain to the exist.ng channel within the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds. ttpon completion of the 24th Street Drain to the temporary outlet, the City shall promptly release the security filed pursuant to the previous p`.ragraph and Developer shall substitute, in its sole discretion, a cash deposit, letter of credit or bond, in a form acceptable to and Ami approved y the City Attorney and City Engineer, in the amount of $ as and for security for the cost of constructing the permanent outlet and of removing the 'temporary outlet from the 24th Street Drain. Upon issuance of, and in accordance with, the environmental permits and any other required governmental authorizations for construction of the City Master Plan Storm Drainage 'Facilities, Developer shall Install the permanent outle� from the 24th Street Drain to the permanent retention basin within the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds and removo the temporary nutlet described above. Upon completion of construction of the permanent outlet from the 24th Street Drain and removal of the temporary outlet, the City shall promptly release the security filed pursuant to this Paragraph. Standard drainage fees for the Site shall be credited to that portion of the construction costs incurred in constructing t _ permanent drainage facilities specified on the City'a Master Plan k of Drainage, and the developer shall be reimbursed for allowable costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City policy. Any k, additional costs for over-sizing facilities for interim flood protection shall be borne by the Developer. k7 H, 9. Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, r o' Developer shall, at its option, either construct a permanent ,.°' retention basin within the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds to mitigate ' increased flaws at the outlet of the 24th street train er pay in- TF I --6- Ir lieu fees therefor as required by the City or the Flood Control District. Upon recordation of the Final Map for the Tentative Tract, Developer shall- file, in its sole discretion, a cash deposit, letter of' credit or, bond, in a foi.4 suitable to and approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer, in the aitount of $ as and for security for its pro rata share of the cost of constructing the permanent retention basin. Upon completion of the permanent retentions basin or payment of in-lieu fees, the City shall promptly release and exonerate the security filed pursuanC to this paragraph. in the event that environmental permits or any other required governmental authorization for construction of the permanent retention basin have not been issued to th,:. Ctty nr.the County of San. Bernardino prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, Developer shall (a) construct,\at its own expense, a temporary,retention basin within the subdivision and (b) file, at Developer's option, either a cash deposit, letter of credit orabond, in a form acceptable to and approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer, in an amount of $^ as security for tAe cost VL abandoning the temporary reten Aon basin. Construction of the temporary retention,,„7basin, if necessary, shall be completed prior to ivsuance Of the first certificate of occupancy. A maintenance agreement shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City httorney guaranteeing private maintenance of the temporary retention basin by the landowner or other entity approved bv_thea City Engineer and City Attorney, but providing the City t,;-I-,tha right of access to maintain the temporary reuentior inyi.f private maintenance is insufficient and allowing iz. v to xgsetss those costs to the landowner or other entity. Afvs,,, ` 4e 24th street Drain and the permanent retention basin withiif-tie Etieanaa Spreading Grounds are constructed and operating, Developer or its successor in interest shall remove the temporary retention basin and thereafter may immediately reclaim the lots encompabsed by the temporary retention basin and be entitled to issuance of building permits to develop them in accordance with the map. Upon completion of removal of the temporary on-site retention basin, the City shall promptly release the security filed pursuant to this paragraphs na�c�oaoea..ts ` I i 1A, TT a 5 _ fir- -• � �� � � � J . TI CITY OF rraL Am r RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1`rML. 4-7 i t , - I I INrr Y MJ Av— /y/r/.:t r ,L rl t:,J ��` �f+ {"'t r y�i•r�e.4•�t�' (�). 4 G . /.�' ./ 0 t,�•r•� �0 \t��t� �} aa..t �r. 1111i �Tv-MI `i a' � CIP /•• `+ j� ti'a..•l'..��r'`•�4 7 ,�,. t e �I �"� P^,1 Y t ).-� L!t. _ / ��t.r� •.J 1 �B 6t1__i I � �.�i+�•r�". � • �`� 1 �� .� td-1 ..r'n_ t,� ST 1 .t _ ' •O• J7lE Y.. rry r it °� ! r.4• n ���i,tdr�J�l�dO. C? „� LY 'L) C•ik C"1��.,� Rt�y t.? t) tyi�t,,��w,i,�i�t.•sl �± ;_l �a .. • "Ei ..,,. e ..."�37 ,.aw'ate... ..s.• r T-T 03 2,7 RANCHO CUC AMONGA TrI �.- 2H, L..,T41a_ LAY.G-2I�� tic 1. .. QOLDEN �RARIE_ 'ROAD z 1� CITY OF Mm - t� RANCHO C€JCAMONGA ENG (.. DrvMoN TLxmrr.. 0� P , RESOLUTION NO. Aft Tw i A RESOLUTION OF THE, PZAh'NING COMMISSION iF THE*CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA " v`ALIFORNIA, APPR02ING A MAP MODIFICATION TO ALLOW A 'TEMPORARY rN-SiTE DETENTIO$''BASIN OF -.PPROXIMATELY 56,000 SQUARE FEET IOCATED ON Lit;S 1-5, FOR APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14139 OF 119 `SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 54 ACRES OF LAND- IN THE LOW RESIDERTTAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 25TH STREET, AND MAHING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 22S-082-.J1 A. Recitals. (i) On July 12, 1989 the Planning Commission adopted resolution No. 89-95, thereby approving, subject- to specific3d conditions,. Tentative` Tract 14139. (ii) On March 1, �.99i, a request was filed by Ahmanson Development, Incorporated, to .r-dif_y the tentative map to allow ,a temporary on-site detention basin. (iii) The request resulted from comments from the San Bernardino AMk County Flood Control District regarding _drainage into the Etiwanda, Creek Spreading,Grounds. (iv') On March 27, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public- hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. B. Resolution. r NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rar,cho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission herebyffapecifically finds that all of the facts bet forth in the Recitals,. Part A, o1- this:Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substanti',l evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced pubic ;oaring on March 27, 1991, including written and oral staff reportai, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The modification request applies to property located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 25th Street with a street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue of approximately 1,350 feet and lot depth of 1,005 feet at the north tract boundary and $;400 feet at the south tract boundary; and (b) The property to the east of the property is designated for residential use and is currently vacant, the property to the mouth of the project is pproved Tract 13527, and the property to the north and west of the project ie an SCE corridor and is currently vacant. -H— I b PLANNING COMMISSION' RESOLUTION NO. TT 14139 AHMANSOW _WMLOPMENT MARCH 27, 1991 PAGE 2 Ank 3. Based . .on the substantial �_Iidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public tearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the previously approved tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Develo+invent Code, and,specific plane; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Cone, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of developmer. ', proposed; and. (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife ` or their habitat; and (a) The tentative tract modification is not likely to cause serious public-health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract wi!l not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the modification application subject to each and every condition oatforth below. PLANNING DIVISION (1)' The proposed on-site detenSoion ban); should be reviewed and approved by the Design P iQw rr-, ittea for landscaping and screening issues prior te- issuance of building permits. (2) Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089 (b), this application, shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated,environmental action is filci and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) anli and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section -711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the Count of San Bernard no. Y .i The applicant Afthshall: provide the ,Planning Department with a stamped and IV conformed copy of. the NOD ;together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. 1�-ll PLANNING COMHISSIO;'T RESOLUTION NO. TT 14139 AHMANSON DEVELOPMENT MARCH 27, 1991 PAGE 3 In the„. ;ant this application is determined,exempt from ;ach filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment- of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of. Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. - Engineering Division (1) The design of the temporary on-site drainage detention facilities shall be justified by a final drainage report and approved bg the Cf.ty Engineer. These•, temporary detention facilities are to remain until such time ns drainage/detention facilities may be constructed within the Sxn Bernardino County Flood Control District Etiwanda Creek Spreading Grounds. Upon__ authorization of the Flood Control District allowing the commencement of 'design and construction, the Developer shall diligently pursue approval of design and construction of drainage/detention facilities to the satisfaction of the city Engineer. The temporary on-site detention facili.L is shall be regrAded to accommodate the subdivision imroadiatelk ,upon completion and acceptance of the drainage/detention facilities within the Etiwanda Creek Spreading Grounds. An agreement shall be executed and security pouted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City A(; orney guaranteeing: (a) private maintenance of the tempor,'r detention facilities, but providing the ^,ity with the right-of-access to maintain the facility if the private maintenance"is insufficient and allowing the City a means to recoua the_coet, (b) the design and construction of tiie necessary drainage/detention facilities within the Flood Control District Etiwaada,` Spreading Grounds, (c) the design and construction of this permanent outlet from the 24th Street Drain into the Flood Control District Etiwanda Spreading Grounds, and (d) regrading of the temporary detention facilities`. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall cerhify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MARCH 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary aS _ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14139 - AHMANSON DEVELOPMENT MARCH 27, 1991 PAGE 4 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the :foregoing 8P=;j.dtion was duly and \` regularly introducedr paused, ,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of .Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meating,of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of March 1991, by the following vbte-to-wit:'' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: :ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: l i SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP LIMITED March 27, 1991 Susan Chitiea City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 REP: Arrow Business Park 9007 Arroij Route, Rancho Cucamonga C,{ .P_ 91-06 Dear Ms, Chitiea: 'Fnis letter is a request for support regarding Arrow Business Park; a 139,921 square foot development on 8.7 acres approved on July 23, 1986.` Since approval was obtained, the Par., has been completed an-1 available for lease for several years. Recently,, we received approval (within 45 days) for support improvem.Pnts (hall ; stairs, acid restrooms)- for the mezzanine area. These mprovement.;-. uotaiii,v $78,000.00, are complete. When obtaining these approvals, at no tir.c was the :zed for a C.U.P. brought to our attention, amll, orly a reference was made to future parking verification. We are currently seeking approval for 2,696 square feet of L:hc`,"' ex sting mezzanine designated for office use at the ti-me of tht o_iginal approval. (r' While we are asking you to support a shared parking concepr, we are also impleffienting modified leasing procedures to runner mitigate future parking requirements. We realize that an abundance of office-type users in the future will jeopardize full leasing capabilities, thus we are active!y pursuing tenants with minimal office space needs. Example: Building 3, Suite 1#120 (1,853 sq. ft.) is being leased to a business needing one stall requiring no office (providing k a dividend of 2 stalls) . il,612 ARCHIBALD AVENUE,SUITE 201 + RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 41730 FEL:1?14)987-7241 • fA\:(;14)944.8101 SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP LIMITED Page Two We -sk that you recognipe our commitment to future tenant j acquisition whose emphasis is pn business support anvIwarehouse uses as opposed to -,office which, in turn, will riot only help to achieve our goal of adequate parking, but those of the planning I staff as well. In closing, we ask for:your support on this C.U.P. on the existing office mezzanine consistent with the original approval of July 23, 1986. Sincerely, SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP LTD. Alan E. Smith 8632 ARCHIBALD AVENUE,SUITE 201 n RANCHO CUC MONGA,CALIFORNIA 91730' a. TEL.,(714)987•7241 • FAX,C14)944-8101 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 27, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad BulAti i' city Planner BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT' 91-06 - SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP The request to establish an administrative/office use in a leased apace of 2,696 square feet within the existing Arrow Husinsss Park on 8.7 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Area Specific. Plan, located at 9007 Arrow Route - API; 209- 012-19. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action gecLuested: Approval of a non-construction Conditional Use Permit to allow for administrative/office use within the mezzanine area of the Arrow Business Park at 9007 Arrow Route. •'.; B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing apartments and park; Low Rasidential (2-4 dwallin%units per acre) and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) South Warehouse; General Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 2) East - Manufacturing; General Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 3) West - Manufacturing/office; General Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 2) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - Medium Residential and park South - General Industrial' East - General Industrial West - General Industrial D. Site ChaFacteristice: The project site is developed with an existing multi-tenant industrial center.. E. Parking Calculations: See attached Exhibit "D." 1'rEtK 3 PLT-NNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP' 91-06 SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP March 27, 1991 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. Generals Southwest, Design: Group is requesting approval of non-construction conditional Use Permit 91-06 to allow administrative and office use-within`2,696 square feet of the Mezzanine area within the Arrow Business Park. The proposal contemplates a speculative office and/or professional design service with proposed hours of operation from 7.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m., Honday`-through Saturday, B. Issues The primary issues related to locating this type of use within an industrial park are compatibility with surrounding land uses and parking. 1. Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses: There are a variety of uses within this renter. There '_:re several financial and administrative professional ot!Uces located within the subject building (for a complete';;sting see Exhibit "D"). No compatibility problems have krisen within this business center since the development of the project. Therefore, staff siaticipates no significant compatibility problems with this propg�al.'+; 2. Parking: The raster plan for Arrow Business Park was approved by the Planning Commission on July 23, 1986. The master plan consistedZof three phases. The first phase, which includes the proposed building, consists of seven buildings totaling 131,921 square feet. Buildings r, `1d 2 were built as multi-tenant light industrial with afrsca use within the mezzanine areas. Multi-tenant parking requirements allow up to.3S percent of the gross floor area to be devoted to office use. Phase I was approved for 21,424 square feet of mezzanine office space which equals 16 percent. The parking ratio for Phases I was calculated at 1 space per 400 square feet. A total 380 spaces were provided. For both the existing and future tenants, a total of 435 parking spaces are required. This total indicates a deficit of S5 parking spaces. Essentially, the existing tenants have used up all of the 35 percent of floor area for office users. Under the optional Parking Provisions within the Development Code, the Planning commission may approve shared parking which allows parking facilities to be used jointly by-,,other uses when operations are not normally conducted, or when peak hours vary. Three._ existing tenants - Dee Dees Dance School, Traditionaj American Karate, and Word of Life Church - maintain PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-06 SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP March 27, 1991 Page 3 operation hours during off-peak times for the center. All three businesses hold a majority of their classes in tie evenings, between 5:UO and 9:00 p.m. on weekdays and on weekends. The total amount ofparking required for these three facilities -is 87 spaces. The hours of operation for the three businesses are as followaz Dee Deals Dance School: � 1 Classes - Weekends and after 3:30 p'm. (students are echcol-age children) Monday through Friday. Traditional American karate: Classes 10:00 a.m. to 9:30 p.m., Monday through Friday with the majority of the classes' in tha evenings and on weekends. Hord of Life Church: Public assembly - after 6;00 p.m., Monday through Friday and,,VM�tends. Office hourss -- 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. I Under the shared parking concept, ,staff fells that the proposed office use will not negatively impact both current' and future users. In addition, staff will continue to closely monitor future tenants as they locate within the center. Staff requests that the Commission review the "rking issue and make a determination on the shared parking concept for the Arrow Business Paris. C. Rancho Cucamonoa Fie® D3str�ct/Po�iee DeoartmeR : Both the Fire District and the Police Department have been notified of the proposed use. The Police Department has expressed no significant concern over the propoaal. The Fire District will require plan check prior to occupancy. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following findinas:,in order to approve this application: A. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the DRv/alopament Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which t:r'-,site is located. B. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. EVA PLAz�i,TNG COmmrSSION STAFF RLPORT RM CUSP �1-06 - SOUTHWEST '"BSIGN GROUP March 27, 1991 Page 4, �1. C. That the proposed use complies with each of the 'applicable provisions ofthe Industrial Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: JThis item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland yallev Dally Bulletin newspaper, the property has .been posted,.. LA notices were sent t0 adjacent-,property owners within, 200 feet of the project. V., RECOMMENDA1110th If the Punning commission makes the determination that adequate parking facilities exist thi:augh the shared parking concept„ then approval of COnditionLI C-,e Permit 91-06 through-the attached Resolution of aipproval,would be appropriate. Respect- sub%' Cr Bu r cy Plnnere� 10 SB:ALH%mlq, Attachments: $xhib:'t "A" - Sitc. Plat: EXhibtt "B" - Floor Plan Exhibit "C" - Letters from Applicant Exhibit "D" Parking Calculations Exhibit "E" - Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Comments Exhibit "F Rancho Cucamonga Po ,ice Department Comments Resolution of,Approval i t¢�W MLL. O JI G O O 'V . o Ii''' • N lV N N N 1-0 W; i t1 ea 4=� C Q'.H M Y N b. P m ON CS SOW CD Lo OILY o �m A, i W OLLM o Oela Q` "" O4lY co i I 1111110111111111 D o c LU _ OBLY N ry n .. m Z i it i I i it � it C7 0 `V OSIa m Q fl iN � gm - i N M f u11 O O I c o. wo q s Z< $ w W MLL. .. si VINEYARD AVE. o' i e 1 e e a I � � CAD Amon i o �$ 4L a � . ffi Q s � m SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP LIMITED February 22, 1991 i I City of Rancho Cucamonga _ Planning Department f 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 I RE; Arrow Business Park 9007 Arrow Route, Second Floor Xezzani-ae To Whom It May Concern: We are filing for a`Conditional Use Permit Non-Construction for the above-refarencec project: The CUP is being, applied to the second floor mezzaa$x area only; so that future submittals may incorporate uffice professional, design and research to make use ;for second floor mezzanine areas. If you should have any questions or require additional infor- mation, please do not hesitate to call. f Thank Alan E. Smith f 4-- 8611 AR HIBALD V%E\CF,SUITE 201 + RANCHO CL'CAMONGA.CALIFORtiW`9 '30 - CCI;i"140 IR;='241 4 FA\.+7141444-8101- MRR-05-'91 TUE 10:51 ID:SMiTH -XUDERBRCK TEL NG:714 944 8101 »44is ca2i02 ... r O UTT DESIGN GROUP LIMITED March 5, 1991 f: r ~ city of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center. Drive Rancho .CucamongFa, California 91729 RE: Arrrw_Busine$s Park 9007 Arrow Route Second Floor Mezzanine TO SHOW IT MAY CONCERN: -We are filing for a Conditional Use Permit Non-Construction for the above-referenced project. The 'CUP is being applied to the second floor mezzanine area only, so that future submittals may incorporate, office pro- fessional, design, and research to make. use for second floor mezzanine areas.- Office hours will be on anaverage of 700am to 6000pm, Monday through Saturday. If you shouldhave `,any' questions or require additional in£or- matioa, please do not hesitate to call. Thank'you, Alan E. Smitb- 1 jet + 8632 AKCHEBALD AVEVUE,SUITE 201 *' RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIK)KN1A 9173U 11, TtL7141 987.7231 0 FAX:(7'14)944.8101, Arrow Business Park PARKING CALCULATIONS VW BUSINESS NAME TYPE OF USE SUITE Sg.FT. PARKING RATIO PARKING REQUIRED 9007 AIM:)W ROUTE 27.716 .tt Marc Berm Construct Contractor's office 100&120 2210 1/250 sq.ft. 9 Warehouse 2210 1/1000 sq ft 2 OPARC Office 160&170 4420 1125C sq,fL 18 Em f e Service Repair service 180 2210 1/400 sa.ft. 6 Califomta Em L^e Office ce 200 1082 1/290 sq,ft. 4 American BanIdng Office 235 3E4 1/250 sq,ft. 1 180 Cal rem Oiftce 260 1 1 250 sq.ft. 7 Total sq.ft 14287 VACANT Office 4700 1/250 sq.ft. 19 Warehouse/Lt Ind 8729 111000 sq.fL 9 SUBTOTAL 75 (ParkinRequired) i 9047 ARROW ROUTE 19.632 sq.fL Dee Dee's Dance Studio Health studio 100&110 31rO 1/1508q.ft. 21 Office 900 1 250 sa 4 Rancho Janito Office 120 648 ' 1 250 an.Sr. 3 Warehouse 1200' 1 1000 sq.ft. 1 Em 1re m Business service130-160 5344 1 1000 sq. 5 Office 1 1220 1 250 so.ft. 5 Word of Ile office 180&195 1960 1 250 sq.ft 8 1106 1 35 sq.fL 31 Bear Belly Eat= 190 1020 1/100 10 To 16572 VAC.TP,T ce 1070 1 250 4 W use In 1989 l 1000 2 SUE nUrAL 95 (Parkinaulix 9087 ARROW ROUTE 30888 Karen ar Business Service 100 1114 1 400 sq.ft. 3 Size Tech Business Service 110 1950 1 400 sq.ft. 5 United Ae Office 130.220&30 4329 1 250 . 17 W ouse 1 1443 1 1000 sq.It 1 C O ez 150&240 14224 1 250 . 57 W ` ouse 1220 � 1 1000 1 a 1 M r M 200 200-7-1- 200 sq. 10 Warehouse 1253 i 1000 a .IL 1 Ttm Burns Business Service 210 936 1 40i1 a . 2 1 77 Total sq.fL r 28 002 'Armor Business Park r;\ VACANT Office 830 1 250:sq.R. 3 Ware use t.In 1551 1 lOW 2 SUBTOTAL 1 W M(Panda Re utred 9017 ARRO V ROITIE 12650 ,r Service Master Office 100 3268 1 250 L't Warrt3use P 9382 111000 sq.ft. f i 12650 VACAN4 0 SL�3TOTAL 22 ui 9037 ARROW F.00RE 15300 Christine's Crafts -Office 15O 427 1 259 2 W Ouse 1373 1 1000 1 Moukvn _ Office 160 337 1 250 N4 1 Warehouse 1463 1 1000 sq.fL l R&J Dra O-INce_ 170 430 1 250 so.ft. 2 `n ouse 1370 1 1000`so.ft 1 1Y 81' ft 5400 VACANT office 3465 1 250 14 W Ouse 6435 1 1000 6 SUBTOTAL 29 PParkin uinedl 9057 ARROW ROUTE 16320 Wlflfam Flaheritv Office 100 1125 1 250 sq.fL Warehouse 200 1 1000 sq.ft. 0 Re P !o er. OM;- 140 384 1 200 so.fL 2 W ruse 1536 1 1000 sq.fL 2 Tral Amer.Ka-� to O ce 1501E 160 800 1 1 250 3 Head Studio 3040 1 10 .it. 20 C 370&180 2400 1 250 sq.ft. 10 TO 9485 .> VA^..ANT Offlee 2392 Warehouse 6835 1 10 1 25000 . u1 7 10 SUBTOTAL cvg Warktng 9077 ARROW ROUTE 17415 San Antonio Hos Ital office 100 9300 1 250 37 Warms Dune 1200 1 1000 sq.ft. 1 i To l0 E; VACANT ce 2420 1 250 10 Warehouse d495 I/1000ag.R. 4 SUB2iDTAL 53 TOTAL PAIL13NG REQUIRED 434 TOTAL;PARIONG PROVIDED 380 1b / ups TRIP .a . Ltdrt�C_ 12t Lid?CA IA de_� F f R f r.w%. 7 IQ�.N:fG M SUBJECT a J �j Tv l��L t�rhirae S� T;G P1 IrC1 7 f4sac�rSATE c 11 / / ? f MESSAGE 17;� _ GQ .n.eon.u t4.OUL A.)a ... r,Ial'LA Cl(/ ri� %�r'i`7yrCT GsncL�i.:(�s� c� r✓,.�s.,z,.�_ LJs�r t o'..ww � , f_k �w �LCr v-Cam,/�✓ caw.Q o �LireJclA/rT1d4 ark✓ / � � juC+L �f�QCeS SIGNED d..��`. REPLY' MAR 7 IN SIGNED DATE 45 4T3 SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 INTACT• POLY$1,eSt(SO StET51 4$d32 i PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. it j J!, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM RE'�EI'VEQ,�;RRiGA bt?Y��ptANCH a rE;e.at�INl '- 4gt L�aaJoe awaoa SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL 'USE PERMIT NO. 91-06 FOR OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL DESIGN USES' WITHIN 2,696 SQUARE FEET OF THE MEZZANINE AREA., LOCATED AT 9007 ARROW ROUTE, IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND MA.XING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-012--19 A. Recital.e. (i) Southwest,_Design Group has -filed an application for the modification of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-06 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Una Permit request is referred to as "the applicahion."' (ii) On the 27th day of March 1991, the Planning Commission, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heirirg on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution I have occurred. H. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commisallon hereby specifically findo that all of the facts i set forth n the.,Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. l2. saaed upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 27, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this commission hereby specifically finds as follows. (a) The application applies to rrOperty located at 9007 Arrow Route with a street frontage of 770.63 feet an,; at depth of 622 feet and is presently improved with 7 industrial buildiuga and 380 parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is an apartment complex and park, the property to the south of that site consists of industrial buildings, 14a property to the east and west is industrial; and (c) The application allows the ar:+'-icant to maintain office hours from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through, saturday) , (d) The application applies to property whereon three Conditional Use Permits have been granted for users whose hours of operation are primarily evr7ings and weekends, thus the peak parking demand is offset and a joint use of parking facilities is occurring. f _ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-06 - SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP March 27, 1991 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission' during the above-referenced pliblic hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs; 1 and, 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and thepurposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use-, togfAther with the. conditions applicable thereto, will not be`Jetrimentk to t��a public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to"properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable.__ provisions of the Development Code. 4. Th' ,'Commiszion hereby-'finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed a ..n considered exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condit.Ccn net forth below: 1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the. industrial Area Specific Plan andxall other City ordinances. 211 If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, including but not limited to, parking, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration a(' possible termination of the use. 3) Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building a Safety Division to show compliance.' 4) Any signs for the proposed facility shall be designed in conformance with the Sign Ordinance and any Uniform,Sign Program for the complex and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-06 SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP March 27, 1991 Page 3 AM V 5) The second floor mezzanine area of Building 1 at 9007 Arrow Route shall be utilized as office and professional derign services. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MARCH 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lazy T. MCNiel, Chairman ATTEST• Brad Biller, Secretary I, Brad Duller, Secretary of tha Planning Commission of the P -,T of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution'--aua duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adoiited by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho .Cucamonga, at a va3gularl-aVieting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day„of March 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CWOAMONGA STAFF REPORT .4016 RP DATE: March 27, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, city Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 90 14 SC87,OSSER FORGE - A request to reduce the required number of parking spaces in connection with the development of a 14,000 square foot industrial. building within an existing manufacturing complex in the minimum impact heavy industrial designation (Subarea 9) of the'Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-111-17. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 90-21 SCHLOSSER FORGE - The development of a 14,000 square foot industrial building within an existing manufacturing complex in the minimum impact heavy industrial designation (Subarea 9) of thc- Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avec;is - APN 229-111-17. i I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the Variance, Conceptual Site Plans, Building Elevations, Landscape Plan, and issuance of a Negative Declaration.`' B. s urrounding Land Use and Zoning: Ndz"-'k - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 8 South - 'Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 9 East - Industrial Complex, Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 8 West - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 9 i C. General Plan Desionations- Project Site - Heavy Industrial North - General Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East - General Industrial West - Heavy Industrial D. Site-Characteristics.- The e .te is presently developed as a manufacturing compl= consisting of an administration building, a warehouse building, and four manufacturing buildings. In addition, there are vacant areas of the site available for future 1 expansion plans. ITUI J u K PLANNING'COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VA90-14 SCHLOSSER FORGE March27, 1991 Page 2 II. BACRGROUnD: When the City first entertained the idea of updating the ` In,,Uatrial Area Specific Plan (ISP) in 19a6, Schlosser Forge: was c1Jncerned that modifications to the_ISP would not allow them to expand their business in t:%e future. Schlosser Forge's manufacturing ;iperation crAatss noise and vibration that might affect adjacent lfrogerties resulting in limitations on the Forge's business. in order i,o allow Schlosser Forge to expand their business consistent with (heir current operations, the City entered into a 40 year Development Agreement with Schlosser Forge that would allow the uorge to expand their facilities in accordance with 1986 requirements and specifications for Subarea 9 of the ISP.• In May of 1987, the Planning commission approved: the most recent addition to the Schlosser Forge complex consisting of two manufacturing buildings, including the one.,at the ;corner of Arrow and Rochester. In conjunction w.th the development of those two buildings, the Planning Commission also approvew a Variance to allow the seduction of the required number of,� parking Jtalls, the elimination of the requirement for trees to be,Ranted within parking lots at a rate of one tree for every three parking stalls, and the requirement for trees to be planted in areas of g-,blic view adjacent to structures at a rate of one tree for every 30 lineal fe-ut of building. In approving the Variance request, the Planning Commission determined the following; A. That the special type of machinery used was not labor intensive and was a unique facility as compared to other industrial companies in the City. 3ecause the grzeat�,st number of employees on any one shift would be 154, the 234 ;parking stalls provided would be more than adequate to serve the company's needs. B. That the request for the deletion of the landscape requirements was based upon the continuity of existing desirm and that the requirement for on-site landscaping would Under the movement of the equipment (fork lifts) going back and forth between the manufacturing buildings. C. That the eouth and west aides of 11 Building 5 and all sides of Building 4 require concrete landings for fork lift operations and access to the buildings which would be impaired through the installation of trees along the building. D. That the elimination of the two landscape standards does not imply any reduction in the required landscape area required for the w3te as the applicant wee providing nearly twice the minimum requirement for a development iK thG Heavy Industrial District. PLANNING COMMISSION STA,�.__REPCRT VA90-14 SCHLOSSER FORGE - March 27, 1991 Page 3 III. ANALYSISS A. Generals- The current proposal consists' of a 14,000 "square foot manufacturing building located along the-Arrow Rout` frontage, The structure will be approximately 23 feet high and will be designed using`consistent materials (metal) and colors as was user; for the existing manufacturing and warehouse buildings located hn site. B. Variance: The Indus`.=i 1 Specific Plan (1986j requf.^as_parking , for the now manufacturing btildding to be provided at a rate of one space for every 300 square feet of building area. The following chart identifies the total parking demand for the ent ie site: Parking Calculations: Numh!er of Number ox` hype Square Parking Spaces Spacer% of Use Footage atio_ 'Required Prov`_d Office 16,500` 1/250 66 Manufacturing 171,500 1/500 343 Warehouse 21,600 1/1000 22 431 232 The reduced number of parking., spaces is based on the type of machinery housed within thee-facilities that are less labor intensive than typical manufactur` „':-�s wit}in`the industrial area. Currently, there are 238'park1n3 spaces provided on-site. With the proposed addition, 6 parking spaces T,,U? be eliminated leaving 232 rtalls. -.argest shift currently operated by,. Schlosser Forge consists of'135 people and the total employment at' t, the Forge is 197. Even considering the total number oi'employees for Schlosser. Forge, the number of packing spaces required is well below the 232 parking:spaces that wU be available. C. Design Review_Committee: The Design Review Committee (Chitiea, Tolstoy, Kroutil) reviewed the proposalon February 21, 1991. , that time, the Committee apprared the use of the metal building based on the intent ,of the development agreement allowing SL .looser Forgr to construct new buildings not only in accordance with the 1986 ISP Standards bum also consistent with existing buildings on site. The Chmmittee attached the following conditions through approval of the nzoject; 1. The accent striping (horizontal and vertical) proposed for the new building should be consistent with the accent striping utilized on the existing buildings. 2. Extensive landscaping should be provided along the Arroi lute frontage. Ot J PLANNINQ' COMMIASION STAFF REPORT J VA90-14 $C r 1.;..`l.+q FORGE March 27, Page $ 0.- Envirasnmenta:l Assessment: Afta having completed the Environmental Checklist, staff has Determined that the proposed manufacturing building will not have a significant impi'ct on the environment; therefore, staff recommends that then Planning commission issue a Negative Declaration. IV. FACTS POT, FINDINf'.�: St to Maws as well as the City's Zoning ordnance gives the Planning em nicsion the authority to approve a 7-,s.ariangr 'for certain development standards only when, special circumstances apply t<< the project. Also, Varian„es may be granted when str!.ct enforcement of the Development Code 'would result in practical difficulty or unneceasa-y hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. In this ,.are, the machinery used within the " 3ustrial complex is not labor intens=ya and creaces a unique faci., Y as compared to gther manufacturi*,g companies within the City. As- a result, staff suggests thtt the plan is consistent with the .objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and that the strict interpretation of ''the code would result in unnecessary hardst.:p. In audition, the granting of the variance would not be construed as a granting of special privilege. The Variance and the Development Review wil_ not be detrimental to the public bealth, sa''ety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertisaA in the Inland valley Daily Bulletin as a Public 'daring, the site wMs posted, and notices were sent to all prope--tty owners within 300 feet 'of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Variance 90-14 and Development Review 90-21 and issue a Regative Declaration. p Res tf ly s tad, i Bra e City anne. SB:SM:je Attachmentis: E^.zhibit "A" - Master Plan Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Letter fromthe Applicant Resolution of Approval for Variance 90-14 Res;Oluti,,#r of Approval for Development Review 90-21 ��ii iy It ----- . :{ { Q l � l �i` l l F t ---' -- __. ! id, d t6 - - ---- - --- ----------- wZ p��i .mom SAV W3 —.—_ � �—___- � �� �..«�p• p OD 1 it _ 1 TT tt :9 :] 1 1 C 5 S Gl I r' _ I " 13 n it is (t '1R 1 yl. �� j 1 lei r'1 Y►°f I I I IE= 4]ti1.--. ------- r—r ! ul a. ®iL o g z0 zz l XX �� W�h w e v m Hit S / } a�wA •C �.•.3�3r I 1 I'4t=j y^. ; u+ .cps ' M � 5 z 21 to 1 • A lWa A It m' W p Q. �. a i N , t�' FtJ��f+- `...a.'♦��.�..5`e 7 Z�y�;y�"v_ii.i��E� -• �y}ag i AML RP a� 1 � � � 11 � � • �FF f1l -, r - e f 1 if El AI Al ' n ` r j r 1 w m i V t � 1 _._.. l IFW Adikk c{{ } r 103 1 8opt0 ' I au ® k `t SCHLOSSER FORGE COMPANY 11711 ARROW ROUTE cucAmoNOA,C0k:FORW A-r 730 1714)987.4760 Ank October 11, 1990 City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91710 ATTN: Planning Commission SUBS: Parking Variance for Construction of 70` X 2001 Manufacturing Building We pre;>gntly have 238 marked fuU size (including 4 handicapped) parking spaces. On any morning you will find about 115 spaces occupied, and 123 space:_, vacant. At shift change (300 p.m.) you will find about 140 spaces occupied, and 98 spaces vacant. We presently employ 135 people on day shift, 50 on. swing, and 12 on graveyard, for a total of 197 people. Due to improvements in efficiency we do not expect that the pr% oposed nanufa�cturing i building will chance this number for several years. Also, we I expect that the new ride sharing requirements will reduce the total number of cars on the premises. Parking requirements per the city industrial specific plan are as follows; R'EQ 1D BUILDING USE SQ. FT,. PORKQLA SPACES l Bldg. 01 Mfg. 36,700 1:500 73 2 Mfg. 68,040 1:500 136 3 Whse. 21,600 1:1000 22 4 Mfg. 29,000 1:500 56 5 Mfg. 24,000 1:900 48 I Admin. 16,500 1:250 66 l New 701X Mfg. 14,000 1*500 28 2001 Bldg, I Total 429 Construction of the new building will eliminate 6 spaces; resulting in a .grand total of 232 marked spaces. We feel that this number of parking spaces is adequate, and will serve us' several more years. Also, we would like to maintain our standard. t space of 91 x 7.61 for all parking (6"xeept handicapped), as our Policy is to allow employees to ='park nearest to their work assignment, reg(,,-�Iless Of the size of their cars. 0 In evaluating this request for variance keep in mind that we have acres of existing paved surface and have neve had a need for offsite parking. Should the unforeseen need over arise for more parkin„, we would simply mark 'off more spaces, as our policy is never to require employees to park off the premises. If future buildings are added, >we will pave portions of the undeveloped lan•? (approximately 3.5 acres) Sincerely yours, Albert ts. Holguin, 3^. Sr. Vice president ACTH:lus Ej RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMI$-:',XON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APP!KOVING VARIANCE NO. 90-14, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQVIREr`;NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS.FROM 431 TO 232 IN CONNECTION WIT$'IM DEVELOPMENT of A 14,000 SQUABS FOOT IN�)USTRIAL BUILD Ih :,WITHIN, AN EXISTING MANUFAC mim. COMPLEX IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT `. HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 9) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKIN3 FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-111-17. fA. Recitals. (i) Schlosser Forge has filed an application for the issuance of Variance No. 90-14 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance requant in referred to as "the application." (ii) On the March 27, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to i'he adoption of this Resolution hive occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereof specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct., 2. Based upon substantial evidence ;resented to this Commission during the above-referenced aublic hearing on March 27, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) '.he application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rc:chester 'venue ?and is presently developed with a manufacturing complez, and (b) The property to the -north, south, and west are presently vacant and are designated for industrial uses. The property to the east is developed with an industrial complex and is designated for industrial use. (a) The type of machinery used within the development is less labor intensive than typical manufacturing operations within the industrial �a area. PLANNING COHM2SSION RESOLUTION NO. vAR90- 4 =L0ssn Pons March 27, 1991 ?age 2 ji (d) The total number of people employed for all shifts is 197, with the largest shift being 135 people.: In that" 232 t;erking spaces wili be provided, adequate parking will exist. 3. Boure awn the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during tha above-raierenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts not fc"rth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commincion hereby finds and concludes as followa; (a) That strict or literal nterprstatic,) and enforcement of the specif-ed regulations uoulcf esult in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there are exceptional or extraordinary cizymstancee m conditions applicable to ,the property involved or to the Intended use of tl,e..property that do not apply generally try other operaiee in the same dig` 4, (c) That strict or Literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. _:(d) That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a gr6\t of spet,ial Y.ivilege inconsistent: with the limitations on other prole sties cl.Aisified in the same district. (a) That the granting of the Veriance.will not be detrimental to the public health, saf:ty, or'welfare or smaterial_y''injurious to properties or improvements in the vi:inity. A. This Commisaion hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 ante, further., this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the ffndingo and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 a"rd 3 above, this Commission hereby approvias the application subject to the fojtlowing conditions h 1. pursuant ."'to provisions of California Public Resources Coie Section 210S9(b), this application shall not be operative, jested or final,,nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1), the Notice of Determination (N n) t d4g7 the associated environmental action is f4led and posted with the Work of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2), any and all required filing fees assessed persuanr to Adllh Californi& Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, Etogether with any required handling charges, are !� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ,a1 VAR90-14 SCHLOSSER FORGE March 27, 1991 Page 3 - paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Ber+.ardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Depw tment with a stamped and conformed copy of the'`Notice of Determination together with a receipt showing that Ali fees have been paid. t In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the 4jalifornia Fish and Gape tS6de, or the guidelines promulgated therounde�,, exceept for 'payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adopt3.rn of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TB DAY OF tMRCa 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTESTS Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad. Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission'. f _ ,he City of, "ancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify, that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commieuion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of March 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERP ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i ,, RESOLUTIOR NO. A RESOLUTION OFk TO ,,PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 0_mMONGA', %CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 90-21, 'THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 14,000 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING WITHIN AN EXISTING MANUFACTURING COMPLEX. IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY Iwu$TRIAL DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 9) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AI'" SPECIFIC ( PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 229-111-17. A. Recitr,j (i) Schlosser Forge has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No 90-21 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) Or the of 27th of htrch 1991 the Planning Commission of the t ;ty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a m'&Qting on the application and concluded sid meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisite pr-cr to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Ae olution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho O -smonga as follcva: 1. This Commission,hereby specifically finds that all of the fart;,., ace forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are tr-•1 and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on March 21, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the rrnthwest corner of Arrow 'route and Rochester Avenue and is presently ieloped with a manufacturing complex conaisting primarily of pre-engineered .4ttl buildings, and (b) The property to the ?Grath, south, and West are presently i -vacant and are designated for industrial uses. The property Lo the east is develop.4d with an industrial complex and is designated for :Industrial uses. (c) The project, rith approval of the variance, will comply with all minimum development standards of tha ^ity of Rancho Cucamonga; and ; f (d) The development e= a 14,060 square foot manufacturing bu:lding is consistent with the Heavy Industrial designation of the General Plan; and es I PLANNING C0IMCESSl6:1 RESOLUTION NO. DR90-21 - EVIBLOSSER FORGE Harch,27, 1991 Page 2 (a) The project Is consistent with the provisions of t1e existing development agreement on the property. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to-.this Cum:.aission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth Li paragraphs 1 and c above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows; (a) That the proposed project ire consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is 1h accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use :,a in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Cozo; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not Bak detrimental to the public health, safety, or wolfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vizinity. 4. This Commis art hpxeby finds and certifies that the project has been 'reviewed and ocnsidered in compliance with the Ca ifLrnia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Cc� Mission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusive ` aeC forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby apprO,:. ,the application subject to each w-d every condition set forth belew. and in t. . ;attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated h6z.:in by thit! meference. lann na Riyision: 1. The accent striping (horixorcal and vertical) shall be consistent with the eai,sting buildings. The final design shall bo re%.,awed and approved by the City Planner prier to the issuance of -wilding permits. P. Extensive landscaping shall be provided along #;he Arrow route frontege. The final plums shall be rev awe! and approved by the City Planner prior to the ssuance of building permits. f 3. Pursuant to provisions OZ California Public f Resourcas Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not L-N operative, vested or feral, nar will building permits Ls issuod or a r+ap recorded, until (1), the Not'.ce of Determindtion (N00) J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR90-21 SCHLOSSER FORGE March 27, 2991 Page 3 a regarding the associated environmental action is filed 'snd posted with the Clark of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; -and (2), any and all required fill,-tg fees assbsed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section f - 711.4, together with any required handling ckargso, are paid to the County Clerk' of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the 'Planning Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the Notice of Determination together with a receipt showing that all` fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of'xhe California Fish and Came Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder; except j for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. Engineering Division: - I 1. The easterly most drive app;.oach on Arrow Route l shall be reconstructed to be in conformance with City Standard 306, 2. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the previously undergrounded utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of-Rogaester Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. The fee shall be one-half the difference between the undergroundiing cost of the utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of Rochester Avenge minus those (telecommunications) on the project side times the length from the center of Arrow Route to Lhe south project boundary. 6. The Secretary to this Commission stall certify to the adoption 4' of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED 'MIS ME DAY OF MARCH 1991. -`. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman r PLAMXNG COMMISSION RESOLUT:EON 140. - DR90-21 SMMOSSMA FORGE March 27, 1991: Page 4 ATTEST- 1- Brad Buller, Secretary S, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning' Co►.Aission of-the Cfty of Rancho Cucampaga, do hereby'certify that. the foregoing Resolution was duly and rec ply introduced, passed, and adopted'.X the Planning Commission of the Cits Yx: Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular msstiug of the Planning Commission held on the 27th:day of March 1991, by the following vote-to-wits :AYES: r37MMISSIONERSa NOES: COMMISSWIRERS: ABSENT: COAMISSIOXTRS: C � Ink i if 4; • pe L' Tab.L Oi pYp YO YTi CYOY .. �w`..o Nq D 1../CL aCYO �Y n Q u G 8.C b y yw o. Z o f 4S�ayiS gVS9 QCYO �w.N Gy g iCtl >p x c O q wS �CyguqSy yO.Cl.i q�dep6. O.CO w. � � p -. �� •C`aiVpp�.S VAOCT f wo�PjCO YU4 6x LY�N 1,� 5- L w..n yG w.qGS OC« M-f O. 049 CO O> ^yyOa•C• LOq= Sg 'S aICC�TY YC90� YY�' G.G�w•i i`^4 tO r.^f .. L V.4— L� eC9 rJ uc Ys nnc. en c a',.« Q. r'w Yi �oLa:'°.w Ypp M wPavroo.nc�.o ae'aO« "5 's$a�C .+'` "cga.$co«: awp n r- a6 y ry t, yl� c s�acya. �lO p VVV CCL S Y h 4 o d6 O C 4>q N \p 9<Y yyO O L C t C O a Y C N C'yyy■q N N D..■O O O Y YOOO n Y g C M t u p.q Y �YyC pCYq YtOj p Y y O ^ +wY M Y .,CC4 w L„L Y w 6 iO7N/.4 w FCOa" 6.YM t'N ysx LL pp OOViw wY�S 40�09 �i nL aLl ri T, AM CYL WyVy� To.o r CO S Yg 4a4 L.LL CYNsS{igiY a eIL 21 f I Ip .75.. daa c .1 0 �• to�s sa«L.« iTp cY YE q� C. 6 7 0�. p y� p� .. n.Y 6 Y:yS Ya.�V^ OttyG Oq.�DftYt�� 1� 'Am y S N Y p� Y 4 Mb ype O 0.rrL.•w. �a3G[ C GV�'wYY yCa GQ `.d O0.y adO q�MO•� �G p��N:�pE GO a FC 6B vµ r ti Y� Y C QC q «i0 l�T� �-.0 q�• OL O. Y�O.^ YN � LL .(fps i ""aa..aJ wu .�..}4O 'OYY V .•.+G •q ''«INFO CM C�.N Q a^a Y COS �0 dN aM O..�.�.4�I�� Y O w — L F t Y O V l qjQ �oEO ^�^$>�d»= qea y, �O Y Y q q 0.C a O L S N 2- iC`' qy± y NzYNa O.~'n M CC4yCA G.NgV Y a M.^ y 4 lYlOf�Y. VACOC. M Y{pG�1 16gOlO� 0.m Y G C v 0 q w N a�1 L�y�.7(OGpp �N.N y y p q Ype V M �GGr a f;i V= O L C C �O Y �p aCCY q'i1� aM Y _` YCq•C YyG Y 24 gg`..aSG��d."'i �$~ ^�qyc $ uSis ''. c Noy$ Yoo .51 E`iiE�, icy. �_gcguy(e/ qua .c. C`®pG�a yo. 'Ldo a« ►LOLm sa� 0 G O�'G ^�L a.„Y C w W V N <YO.M N V Y 6 w G=:1 Is. aC L q M$ IL oGwvu. 3 N6 N ". � N !•1 K N 4eo ag airc a°^ _.w q YtN«'® ter >.atiptiV 'o;S'oK {�04 0.Y �y.O w C Y Y LM MJEOVMn `y FdiO Y04 « O.YOd -N 4Laily ogN 6y V6 L� YL 0a CC '7'G Qem— `''m YE oeu.iS eyG „r� tNr�w�;yC.�F waaaa °G�w'�.�. + 3 W b'AG sOg Ap w ^ aC .Y yavN`. CC =l. y'`. 'A• N� `W0. O `tee OQ.. .V.•p�6y. NLwL , Sa�Y CYO QZ: ^R y�00C0.NpySp1�• yd Cd.C�y.... Y�CyYY Gyp ELLD40Lq O iw� GY L;N «5�' V.✓.` �CC+a�Cg.S� ~N Y�Y rr pp YC ��G aj y ^ +a W`S 1HGTffi.L OG Crin 3 9CCVgq d91tLy^C��loY�LO Y1Z YO{N� �90YwkY.^�. �.qCN LO. 9N�CC �y.�� 4$Y `C \�•« Q p;y NR't3^Y�GGa SCgbq.�BG. OCa.0 O. C w V g i w CIG C F 4 N O 1st H=. 'o .Yi= u=e: v'3'�v w.. a r■r Y�'LGi�o a� a v a���000. c uw LL s �\�� r ' ' Y C VG✓i wL LGOY C•'?... �.L u9.�. oar � nu .'�an�"' ±u o.M.0 O . .r3G A:+. v� q.«Y�EQi^®Yc K z� oc tw oN o.«Y.• iLwam= vp e€'Ya Lp ur r'o u?=.: ou-$onF 7Y Ko"«ov1a��b Y � 6tYL. C i•. SdwY ^ C..0 ^ S ■O>L NLp.G AO.� „ +^ LgT4^Q C> LL�d V- ✓ Gvp .. OL G ^V.4 G_D�y pOF Y. LL�r �\3 ^4NC b 411 l M� YO PTO, .400p 0'O �C�.a.✓ � _..�!.d� .. v\. Oy C+ IC. _ p✓ �Y ✓ Y4:0 ✓Y 4 Gw+. L y9 C � > wN 4 LL Y E+p..GBIC Yy CaL^� + C r4n20�Y � �^ Y ✓q Yy E Y � 9 0% 3Na GANN C C Y w^ ' M4 G l V Y-wT g O >C ONNYUdY«-SAY. wLY -C s GL. 219 tAYV 0 4~ P�`CL- 04. �O 1 ,C Y +9 M yY O qqY y Yeti Nye- I N O Y^O a✓ O Lr N�Vc.,✓CG g p C OCLr O N-L C^y 04 'C✓ COYo C YY Y C NLI L p ✓Mq YO V4M 4Lp.0 Y.P6N q�p. V N:II _G Lam~ L� ✓C>a Y iyY d Q.T '"INy .NLw. C4:t a Gg- �Oq T'✓CwccNN.O '� 0.Y� P ,,Illbbb000pu "tiVW � n 4ti� c�orC ✓T.��na �v.. QY c'^�u ✓O G C 0.L G. F U y. U T N Y^P 5 C chi � 0 r o'L C nmc o�a2c 4yYC �L. �Y C✓Y OYY .YnO pYG� N > - .�<Ly ■Nl ■ µNA. N T01ay_^ >� F..�- O G O4 y'M7M w - ^ CL L ttO NryryYy ^. (YU� `4C-1 yNO r F �N Yr�CtgC q^:0.0 445w 06 ^O Y.O.q ON am L u .W. *noaa _rs c^ yoe LY =N Leq S - r N yyP C�. >E. OtOgL P. Y� NS�nG ✓ Ty Vy aPwV :Y. GpY YZ O✓4 �- LNZ.. � NC O GE. Y�✓� �yV CCd ~ ��E�: ,^�O E�Y y Y 4 - Y O t N y M �y =A O` p r ji n• 4�. Y. ✓W V C V ^ Y Gp . + V✓ S 1Y + rG^ P C l C Y � � + J I ✓nN:sy�M cog cM P4�;vN +i- Of Y�a 4 ^ G Y E n+L Gr0„ N OTC YOIY Y V� O �4e N,V wC.G +✓0 Y.CO P+G> y TOj Pn` 0.v 4 pLL �p w�j V� 0 y{G� TO t Y Y Y M ..v C C N—Y. C'+y Q ✓ ✓ j: 0. —Q f. aO YYO O aLa ma a tar -MM zu ioi oN=:. .�ko n cMs� wiutu„p$ d N �� � of�� �� �� '� �I �� ��•i arS��. •N�� Yy�C CamC+ ^CCp p=.•Y Yp i ��Y eT ■'yy��3-} i N p 0� 9. s O.S�4 .. C M '. L:p$ °G�y0. VL �$wpp LY �i` 4y�O4 Yy 4Y y��tV Eli $.G.VN{^ ar rta{bytu. Sri o Yy uui� . pNi OY Ca 0.�p` L ayY� +N�a• C pN N j SgpV9 •L aYD a�O\yM� Lw .NaOu an'4 D0. �4Otyt ZL tlN �� 4P M pN + LSYMC aQp■p■7Go ^0^3 e�p� 4 ■>. Cg:Q- ■p T/GS_er 01A O gvC ��..0 ,Z. dQ Cayy Ypmmm Y4am0.G ' �Ow rs YE. ^OI�tl ...O�tLYil, O 7voY �e.�:'� Ya G��.:... N GGGG>4N can a,i.. VS Swzz py~Y.c- 8 Y^q .LYr•• 'a?+ n„ C FO+ aO AA OCO CiA C O. Nae'L 6ma�K.p Y n_N /F,�• �:ECL! Oa NYY WW■�Q_M Z.. �-'zxy O.6 gYY�w N my YfGY L �O:p M54 B b iy.p.V'g �d '�1 M C Y L. VV6^ d z' +gg^ YYSy pCL+Es 4GYC YC , '}Y.,-..0 V p N uYa ai4� N6Y6 Yr.4o0 NbL C SU Mr U44'. O C �C 64� '� �..Lp U0.>Y f•�Y an�LCr G �C. Y.p Y9 ]�Y 472 �> l Y� 1G'R a-aN a+:Eu.�ii �Gaa C �v'G� lilU"NNI ��..s�.4.o: �7i N sua N Y J_ i i�'r'O� ■ w L� •4-^v N�+.w �O �i s. w 1.�• C..U' t!! pL V Opy 'Q}�L GYG.�i �O( ■'V i ti ' p c� � pVPG Vat EL`� ${9y�M C aoY y tl�Yp 0. xw +M.g• a�8p L 2 a c�ra€ is p� 1 r , tlV N•^Ll a+ 6f^� maw + d.i �O~ -Z M sm o■cY+�. �.IL p.yea . a L> Y.Y ID U L Ix YYP V� p �uGy SN.O ^ ee.6G {V4•r G N ppN�~ '+^ G N> LY9 V G V^�t O O N. +C 6 LwY '�y YM �. � �. ELM aL • M.N i O Y G q 4y {�� �r Q IS oc� ` as ooi� v� sNy N4 +CIN i.Y.r L�.Y+ M ,nD 4 yyyy C(�+'p�O 0. Na N YL l . M �•E 4•�L= V a Y 6 M cl i O Y. �. Y�.LLN Y . ■ C�+6� N N 4 i L ^C r GO.Awsv >u DUGV�. C Y �a,�C}} =ll4GGsy■■O■■■a M ,QGY C5+6 RJRO.r L" MSG GC G G zo ZZ Yl ma N� M Y GO O� 1,V' SL Nn•O.s c V}J'p +:tl�d L e(y` y ywh ��.• �d b:ij 'ro O 'Sp C �dtl NC H 4p Y= �O yy> app• W C OI M a• L M> l tl ♦b Y Y Y tl L U-n4a COM - oyLpO YL CS CO QLO^■C ^ .Yn4'i �.di �+ :f�^ �i 1.i� C �a�.�w C6W OYM•rNr C 4l{OL WNJ �.Ya�tY1. .fir R v Se 0 O C.O+N 'q L b Y � O r gv f �Y . a sM L O LL YP■y YMb.�-� tly?? N tl b L46:yY yY Yy. +p4 = q�'CL L. O Y g L L C n 4 ■O O V M t St tlpp L rtz `+ i.G~ YN4 Lq y6�L `- C.-b OC ll t CV �,�pyyyy� d !N9 4y" �. CqC�O Fp G 4S. O 6 A V N G O M s z W 9 D C tl y r^. y t '�S• Ys � „ iOSm co N +Opa appP'a��PD U �VpC'�C � Ya�L ^ 4q yYMY<lMLy`Y~�4LV1p' LG q44 0{c�u e a tl N {t as > v Atl i. Y. Yyp tl 1L.C�V CO..y VO�e O tlCC O Y 7�Y Y�Y� nz tl Y ? D 90.5 � `N L Cp qy.yO pC �e aL Ytl $N l..�Q O141. Off. •. � Y mil li� -ry O` Ifi W A � Y SH Sao, J. �L' $ ; TL SOUK-I s I' yL �� u- Louct 8. Np � y.O BE x YCC tl p4` C tlXa OpC g� A.O 2. u� `� Vw Y •Q. .G pg Y Y L. Cs gee' �"' Lij. ■. V 'Q eEw �VIL 0. }` jjk� _ o g a ou '_ ._ �.-SCoCg a'3 ^ YY e oL:a qa"-a It-O AL,.7 ro. N- Oy !�i M Y qqb C O D a y pw6 y0 w'gC x� OY^C8 Cy■Ns 3 O�tlt O Y G 4p iY y py L C u'C C Cn N� 4-4� �Oq�+ yRy„� CVL Yz g e tl� 6 �+ $^ s Y" aCC� a '$ y $rbg-� "" cS �e_a$+..pp�y a4 NO C■ D�N® O V 00 VY O'♦ LGe L#y 00 Ez N Y qe. CG5 sy N C.l�$ ::s 2a.c TL Sw +Y a �'� � .y�> ,,a.`.A-I 2,Asg +N•na' LL�ia �tx 3.!,f, a � o IN u(qy` iC> C�L O « Yi•MM� � � � Y •' �p�GY `O EE X" aYNy CC aN S C orb m Y L� nUZ a<p� u N V G + M•�c �C (`1 �cuEp� ce zn rtia ryR ' i �av fi C '� CC � _ Y■ � .c 35. m�.. CV L Y YYy O.CoY0 "+rt yGi ..0 3L 1161 y 4`C- w� ag.4 N .t =:E.Ly O 3 � {O�•• `L EO Y \a •w yY p a! q •�C« C �• {• X E ~^ p gOYI r a` p rp^« 11 pG O y. C i 4•�L. � OnY A g ai..ro .� a • 1C� C O Y C C��g fv Q 5$ C u Y CW 4 W I.♦M i m 3YY,Gy,M L.T ``C CrY M e4 N Y^L lly �'.NYC 4 N O$w` +1V PYY 6Ci EO.ic W`«rr'E.1z aiL �V �Mo.. G F- I � HE tpy~I C V L' �Yy 9i: C NJ. 9!d YC YY� Yy a YNC.« zu ' �l cAti MO N NYC. ^6Y „C�_ uy Ir is C_ yQ «.Y Wit sp4J C yL~ C�4 YyC O� 4M YBOO O" E . w�Y NzYw. v M VC Vi NwM �� = p ^CV)p `f!0 CyYYY GK At«f I a 'Y ow} F wN u •�.r qip v.: Oyu py '�. !■V «3 « a`Y•a ow i ear'~• ne a spa s'�u p'«'o. 9, yy < L1� t. yiO CL {uj Y ^�` �•�I:T NOW Y� ipW a o u. ^t ;ter n� as ^gig TLN LZ Yw +$L Iv o p$o O V� w L OyO Y Y vi I ^I O yl ACC l �rM a M 4 L � Y�`G YGt. v weeV Y w 9 _L`y OM 9C �G OC 6N� '.. {'TIN _Y �S .. � YV w,l=.T �Oa Y LYM 4sY $p Y N C^y C= v. Y 7{�CC L p O MYYC v^7� p.BY. ` y • A Y O t s.Y �aa—Y$. T:Y j:u C`t� iuN ME L' yy _y �NXg ; —L r M G AYw L) ' p O YO ,p O� Oq �« L .� �p � Vu . c`wE G"L l`o oc. ;7^$ c.L. YVe IL �� LL G...C `.AF y GJ kf� ^ M � Y Y < M.N��� t.W.o� M-2�[1 k a5 �9 ! p V Yac Cl s J � K, . 33�(3ECES IPTVESx�d'C-.r.i�.''I'S OEVELOP'IENTS ACOUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES JOHN B.POTTBIZ March 25, 1991 Planning Commissioner tarry McNeil CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 F RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON04 PARKING`ORDINANCE ELIMINATING COMPACT PARKING SPACES Dear Commissioner McNeil: I am writing to you today out of great concern as it re Pates to a proposed amendment to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Parking Ord-'=iaznce eliminating the use of compact parking spaces in commercial . developments, which I unterstand wilt be brought before the Planning Commission imn;-the form of a resolution at the Planning Commission hearing on Wednesday, April 10th. As` you snow, Hughes Invee-tments is the joint venture commmercial development partner with The William Lyon Company for all of the commercial property within the Vico is Coln unity Plan with the exception of the Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center. With nearly 200 arres 'of undeveloped commercial property, this area by far represents the largest imo4nt of undeveloped commercial property in Cane ho M`-iamonga., At 4c;•.ay's current parking ±tandards this represents in exces., of 2,000,000 square feet of additional cou.ercial space generating several. milli-pn dollars in sales tax revenue to the city. This proposed elimination of compact ,paces posss a severe economic threat to all commercial de.', _,spment in the City of Rancho Cucamonga becaus� ,of the potential loss of building area, which in turn represents a substantial loss of sales tax reve+lie to the city. The implications of this proposed amendment ate much too far reaching to come fa;th in the "orm of a resolution by staff to eliminate compact parking spaces. I • aspectfully request that this item be pulled off the agenda for the Alrtl 10th Planning Commission 'nearing and be continued for an undetermined period of time, and would sm9gest that Zhis issue should be discussed at Planning Commission workshop or'' a ,joint Planning Commission/City J=cil workshop so that the appropriate pantie may have an opportunity to address the issue. Thank yco very mach for your consideration of this impo-pant matter. Very tr/INVESEI(OTS, HUGHES ud L CO/V me*110OU J n B. Potter JBP/nyr, Two CORPORATE PLAZA,SUITE 250-NEWPORT BEAW,.CA 920 0 0-792 9 P.:O.OG.+C 8700•NE.WPORT'BEACH.CA 92d58-8700 (7141 759-9531 FLAX-M4)759-0128