HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/05/08 - Agenda PacketO1-� - _ _ o P C® AGENDA' MAY 1991 Q
�o C�CAM��c'
j CITY OF
f, RANCHO CUCAMONGA
0 � PLANNING MMMISSION
AGENDA
1977
WEDNESDAY MAY 8, 1991 8:00 P.M.
MULTI 2AM,ILY STANDARDS STUDY WORKSHOP
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
RAINS ROOM
105 08 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I. Roll Call
Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Tolstoy _
Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Vallette _
Commissioner Melcher
II. Introduction
III. MULTI- FXMILY STANDARDS STUDY - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
The review and discussion of various development
standards and design guidelines for multi - family
projects.
IV. Adjournment
0701-02 o P. C . AGENDA MAY 8 9 1 of 2
10)
AIM
Oo
10)
AIM
r]
CLtCA.uq�
CITY OF
^. RANCM CUCAMONGA
]PLANNING COMMISSION
J a ADEN DA
1977
WEDNE DAY MAY 3, lggli 7:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMOKQh CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CEIMER
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I. Pledge a ?? Allegiance
11. Roll Call
Commissioner Chitiea _ Commissioner Tolstoy
Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Vaillette
Commissioner Melcher
III. zuncuncazents
IV. Approval of Kinutes
April 10, 1991
V. Consent Calendar
The following Consent Calendar items are expected
to be routine and non - controversial. . They will be
acted on by the Commis-'= at -tine 'time. without
discussion. If anyona has concern over any item,
it should be removed for discussion.
A. RESOLU`1tiION OF DENIAL FOR ENVIROMKMU -1-4
AsSESSMma AND CONDIT ONAL USE PERMI 91 -98
CIAS A request to allow retail sales in
conjunction with.a light wholeuals, storage,
and distribution use within an existing 17,384
square foot building in the Industrial Park
District (Subarea 6) of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan, located on the east side of
Monroe Court, north of Jersey Boulevard -
APH: 209 - 144 -42.
B. TIME EXTENSION FOR CC"iDITI0K& UEE PERMIT 88 -42
- PITAESI DALMalU A request to develop a
45,150 square foot YMCA facility or. 4.83 acres
of land within the Recreational Commercial
District of the Terra Vista Planned Community,
located on the east side of Milliken Avenue,
north of Church Street - APH: 227- 151 -13.
C. V}�CATION _ OF A PORTION 4F VINCENT__�VENUE
INCLUDING THE ADJACENT 10 -FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK
BASEMENT - A request to vacate a portion of
Vincent Avenue including the adjacent 10 -foot
wide sidewalk easement, located north of Jersey
Boulevard, east of Red Oak Street -
AM: 209- 144 -27
VI. Public-Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which
concexned individuals may voice their opinion of
the related project. Please wait to be recognized
by the Chairman and address the Commission by
stating your name and address.. All such opinions
shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for
each project. Please sign in after speaking.
B. ENVIROPTRENTAL ASSESSMENT AND T_NDUSTRIAL
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA- A request to amend the industrial
Area Specific Plan by adding swap meet and
extensive impact commerei.l use and their
development criteria withi the Specific Plan
area. Staff recommends, issuance of a Negative
Declaration. (Continued from April 24, 1991.)
E. ENVIRON!lf 2U& ASSESSMENT AND _DMLOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT 9102 - CITY C- `RANCHO CUCAMONCA - A
request to amend various development standards
and design guidelines for multi- family
residential districts. Staff recommends
issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued
from April 24, 1991.) (TO BE CONTINUED TO JUNE
12# 1991.)
F. ^sVT NRiEi1'I'Ar ASSESSt= AND ETIWANDA SP •CIFIC
PI" AMENDMENT 91 -02A - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various
development standards and design guidelines for
Sulti- family residential districts within the
EtiwanCi Specific Plan area. Staff recommends
issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued
from April 24, 199x_) (TO BN CONTINUED TO JUNE
12, 1991.)
G. ZMROR E•NM ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA
PLANNED COMMONZTY AMEIDMENT 91 -02
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various
development standards and design guidelines for
multi- family residential districts within the
Terra Vista Planed Community area. Staff
recommends issuance of a Negative
Declaration. (Continued from Apria 24,.'
1991.) (TO BE CONTINUED TO JUNE 12, 1991.)
H.
U;VIROIvv -M TAT 19 SS M, T AND V_TCTORII� PLADINED
COMMUNITY AME*` QIf2NT 91 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various
development standards and design guidelines, f_or
multi- family residential districts within the
Vittoria Planned Community area. Staff
recommends issuance of a Negative
Declaration., I (Continued from April 24,
1991. ) (TOE FE COWIVUED TO JUN-- 12, 1991.)
I.
MWIRONMOTAL ASSESSMENT AND M0AIFTM1 ALQV TO
COND TIbNA `t USE PERMIT 86 -06 - l2ICFSTENTON
- MCdi.ficiLion of conditions of approval to
allow land uses requiring a more iiatensive
parking ratio than the one provided for
research and development (1 space per 350
square feet) within an existing industrial
complex on 13.7 acres of land in the General
Industrial District °`(Subarea 11) of the
IndustriAl Area Specific Plan, located on the
nore:hweit corner of Buffalo and 6th Street -
APN: 21_`- 261 -754 Staff recommends, issuances of
a Negative . Declaration. (TO BE 0ONTIHDED TO
JUNE 12, 1991.)
J.
�. l�V1jZC! MzNTAL A S r2SMMIT AND COND LTj9N_AI, _ USE
gam, 91-03 - JAMES pj&E - The request to
establish a "mini -mall" (scrap meet) in a leased
space oR 103,552 square feet within an existing
industrial center on 13.77 acres of land in the
General Industrial District, (Subarea 11) of
the Industrial Aurea Specific Plan, located at
11530 Sixth Street - APE: 229- 026 -23. Staff
recommen49 issuance of a Negative
Declaration. Relatee; file conditional Use
Poxmit 8E -06. (20 BE ..MATINUMD TO JUNE 12,
1 *91.)
K.
CgNDITIOWAT U PI TS`➢! 91-12 - VCD ARCHITECTS -
The request to permit an hrchitect's office
within an existing 6,500 square foot building
in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8)
of the IrAustrial Area Specific Plan, located
at 10743 'rdison Court - APN: 209 - 142-67.
VII. Old Business
VIII. New Business
F]
IX. Director's Roports
L. PRELIMINARY REVIEW 91 -06 - CENaRn S-0020
DISTRICT -- A courtesy review of a propo &ed SO
classroom addition to the existing school site
on 3.44 acres of land in the Terra Vista
Planned Community, located on the south side of
Terra Vista Parkway, west of Belpine Place -
APR: 1077- 091 -35.
S. commisrioa Business
31. Public Comments
This is the time and place for the general public
to address the Commission. Itsus to be discussed
here are those which do not already appear on this
agenda.
,al. Adjournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative
Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournmant
time. If items go beyond that time. they shall be
heard only with the consent of the C6&nissi,sn. �
i
�,I
E]
0
El
vicinity map
city of rancho cncamengs
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 8, 1991
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -08 -
MACIAS
I.. ABSTRACT: The attached letters from the applicant were received
after the agenda was distributed. The applicant requests that the
item be continued in order to be allowed to present additional
testimony. Staff is prepared to discuss the issues raised iit the
letters.
11. OPTIONS: The public hearing was closed on P_pril 24; therefore, the
Planning Commission has the following options:
1. Deny the Conditional Use Permit through adoption of the
attached Resolution consistent with your motion on Aril 24,
1991; or
2. Pull the item from the consent calendar and direct staff to
adver'ise a new public hearing on June 12 to allow the
applicant an additional opportr"ity to address the Commission.
Respe submitt ,
Bra er
City P anner
BB:DC:sp
Attachment: Exhibit "A" - ]Getter from the Applicant
Resolution of Denial
J. CRANOR RICHTER
ALAN B. KAITZ
J. CRANOR fUCHTER
IWO VON KAHMAN AVENUE
SUITE 820
3RVINE, CALIFORNIA 92715
May 7, 1991
11 �:. E y t .r �• TELEPHONE
CITY OF P.ANCHO CUCAeAONOA (71A) 955.3868
NG ?" ^y
AU WAY 03
Planning Commission for the�g�,iEjj'�� ?��/u,�T+�i)�
CITY CF RANCHO (1TCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Re; Conditional Use Permit 91 -08 MACIAS
Dear Commissioners:
This is a follow -up to my letter of May 2, 1991, since
'that time I have discussed the concerns of the Commission with Brad
Buller of the Planning Department, as to the following:
a) Percentage of the total operation devoted to retail
sales;
b) Type and size of signage used;
C) The present public entryway as it crosses the loading
dock; and
d) Compliance with all health and safety codes, including
but not limited to appropriate number of exits for the facility.
After having discussed the concerns with my client I feel
ve_y strongly that while the Commission concerns are well taken the
Macias should be entitled to an cpportunitir to address those
concerns, along with any others the Commis .in might have, and
propose solutions acceptable to the Commission.
I therefore make the following proposal, the commission
continue the matter until a later date for the purpose of allowing
the Macias adequate time to meet with staff in orier to address the
Commissions concerns such that Macias facility a,id operation will
meet the objectives as set forth by the Commission.
Sincerely,
LAW OFFICES OF J. CRANOR RICHTER
Alan B. Kaitz
ABK:c,�
G
J. CRANOR RICHTER
ALAN B. KAITZ
.n. VffiCf1 Of
J. CRANOR RICHTER
18380 VON KARMAN AVENUE
SUITE 820
MIME, CALIFORNIA 92715 1ELEPHONE
(714) 955.3888
ITV ;.:0 C!.ICAMONGA
May 2, 1991
MAY 07
118190111112111-018 41516
Planning Commission for the
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Re: Conditional Use Permit 91 -08 MAMAS
Dear Gentlemen:
This argument is submitted in support. of Applicants' reques,:
for a continuance, which request is bast,d upon the following
reasons 1) that this Commission was unduly prejudiced by the fact
Applicant was conducting business without the required conditional
use permit and was without knowledge of all facts surrounding such
conduct; 2) Applicant understood that their CUP would be approved
as staff had recomminded its approval, therefore the Mac. asIs were
unprepared to argue on their own behalf; and 3) to allow sufficient
time for further public opinion.
The undersigned is the attorney for Mr. and Mrs. RAYMUNDO
MACIAS, the applicants for Conditional Use Permit 91 -08, which
would allow the retail sale of tennis shoes in conjunction with
their wholesale and distribution operation locatad at 8711 Monroe,
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and which was one of the subjects
of your April 24, 1991 hearing.
HISTORY:
Previous to the opening of the Rancho Cucamonga facility
the Macias's owned and operated a small family run business known
as DEL RAY TENNIS SHOE WAREHOUSE with locations in the Cities of
Walnut and Corona.
A few years ago as overhead costs began to skyrocket the
Macias's decided that one way to meet these ever increasing costs
would be to open, within their wholesale operations, sma :' stores
offering wholesale prices of tennis shoes to the public.
Planning Commission
May 2, 1991
Page 2
As their wholesale operation expanded a larger warehouse
became neceszary. In late 19r, I, -, Macias engaged the services of
Coldwoll Banker Real Estate Services to assist in locating and
purchasing a new warehouse.
In early 1991, a site was located at 8711 Monroe, and on
or about January 7, 1991, the parties came to an agreement as to
the purchase of the site by the Macias's. Thereafter, the Macias's
started preparing for the opening of this new facility.
On or about January 18, 1991, in preparation for the
openi -7, Mr. Macias daughter Sandra went to Rancho Cucamonga City
Hall a order to obtain the required business license. When Ms.
Mac-ss went to apply for a business license she was handed an
application; was instructed to complete it; and was infc?aed trat
the location would need to be approved by the City P:aaning
Department.
Ms. Macias filled out the application and proceeded to
the Planning Department counter whereby she was greeted by the
Planning Department clerk who reviewed the application and then
went into the back to confer with another person in regards to the
Macias Is application. When the clerk returned she marked the
application ap °roved and informed Ms. Macias that the location had
been approved b} the Planning Department. A true and correct copy
of the Business License Application is attached hereto as Exhibit
"A".. Ms. Macias then proceeded back to the licensing section where
the clerk took the application along with a payment in the
requested amount and issued the license.
The application clearly indicated that the Macias Is
identified the type of business to be operated at the location as
a wholesale and retail business. It further clearly indicates that
the business location was in fact approved for both a wholesale and
retail business.
Upon receipt of the business license and in reliance upon
the approval of the location by the Planning Department the
Macias's expended thousands of dollars readying the facility for
opening.
On or sbout March 6, 1991, an inspector from the Planning
Division had occasion to visit the Macias's business at which time
they were informedi that the retail operation was in violation of
city code as a conditional use permit was required in order sell to
the public.
Planning Commission
May 2, 1991
Page 3
Thereafter, the Macias's with the assistance of the
Planning Department prepared all necessary documentation and on or
about April 24, 1991, the matter was heard by this commission.
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
It is well settled law that a city has the right and
obligation to enact valid zoning ordinances to promote the public
health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community by its
general !elan or methods of classification and districting. Miller
vs. Boars? of Public Works 195 C 477. However, in its operation the
application of the general plan must be related to the individual
Property involved. Specifically, it must be free from arbitrary
and unreasonable conception and application and hence fair and
impartial. Robinson vs. Los Angeles, 146 CA2d 810.
Whether a zoning ordinance is unreasonable, arbitrary and
discriminatory is related to its application to a particular parcel
of property, and each case must be determined on its own facts.
Spindlere Realty Corp. Vs. Manning 243 CA2d 255.
The rules and considerations set forth above apply with
equal force to all zoning regulation. Kissinger vs..x -os Angeles
161 CA2d 454. The theory in zoning is that each d-.;-rict is an
appropriate area for the location of the uses which the zoning plan
permits therein, and that the existence or entrance of other uses
would tend to impair the development and stability of the area for
appropriate uses. In other words, the purpose of zoning and
planning are accomplished by dividing the community into districts
or zones wherein certain uses are permitted and from which uses
incompatible with those permitted are excluded. Los Angeles vs.
Gage 127 CA2d 442.
CURRENT 1ITUATION•
The Macias's property is currently designated as an
Industrial Park within subarea 6 and as such use of the property
includes "LIGHT WHOLESALE, STORAGE, AND DISTRIBUTION, pursuant to
this use the code further allows "Retail sales from the premises
may occur when approved as a Conditional Use ".
The property immediately north of the subject property,
(see attached Exhibit "B "), is within the same zoning district and
is of similar type and use, as such the use should be zimilarly
regulated. However, the property houses six businesses
City Planning
May 2, 1991
Page 4
all of which cater exclusively to the retail public. While it is
true that 3 of these business are specifically provided for within
this zoning district the remaining 3 must have been granted
condftional use permits.
The first being a floor covering sales business, the
second h-4ng a retail printing business, and the third, which is
now closed, was a retailer of wood moldings.
It should be additionally noted that the above mentioned
businesses occupy far more of their total facility for retail sales
then does Macias's. Macias's use of the facility is incidental to
their permitted business enterprise as more than so% of its
facility is devoted e-,,elusively for use in their wholesale and
distribution business, which also includes office sp -ce.
By this point it should be unquestionably clear that the
Macias's request for a conditional use permit for retail sales of
tennis shoes in conjunction with its wholesale and distribution
business is within the permitted use pursuant' -_,o the code.
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
As it would be within the power of the Commission to
grant Macias's a conditional use permit the Commission also should
consider the current situation of the Applicant created mainly by
misrepresentations made or cf1sed by the ambiguous information
contained within the Application and the representation made by
both the Planning Department and the Business License Department.
The first misrepresentation was made by the Business
License Dep -tment when the clerk informed the Macias's that upon
the issuar..a of the business license they were authorized to
commence bua.ness; and
The second misrepresentation is the Application itself.
In the lower left hand corner there appears to be approval of the
Planning Department as to Macias's business location being approved
for the type of business applied for in the application, that being
wholesale and retail tennis shoe sales.
The Macias's run a small business run largely by family
members. As a result of the above described misrepresentation
thousands of dollars and considerable time has been spent in mak:';nq
the necessary improvement to the business location with additiofal
expenditures expected. Should the Macias Is not be granted a CUP
the Rancho Cucamonga business location would no
Plannir^ Commission
May 2, 1991-
Page d
longer be feasible, both economically and geographically resulting
in the )Akely closure of the business at a tremendous financial
loss.
The Macias's business is a well run professional
operation that any City should be proud to have within its
jurisdiction, The business will add to the tart revenuers of the
City and will benefit all surrounding property owners. For these
reasons the April 24, 1991, hearing was met with no opposition by
the public nor surrounding property owners. Additionally, as
previously stated the staff recommended the approval of the ^_UP in
this matter.
As this commission has been trusted to act with the best:
interests of the community at large, to deny the Macias's CUP
without further consideration would not only be unfair and
prejudI ial to the Macias's but would be a violation of the
authority granted to this Commission.
For the Commissions review pictures of DEL REY TENNIS
SHOE WAREHOUSE is attached hereto as Exhibit tic° .
CONCLUSION:
For the reasons stated above the Macias's respectfully
requests that .his Commission grant a continuance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Alan B. Kaitz, Esq.
=ABK:cc
e
i
V '
Q
x m 2 tJ d
V H
a W �g gT7
d R
oQ3v
M R
� — c
U.
d �IDID
to
Z
C7
z
U
i¢
a�� o
0
M�
D
N
M
x
w
F
Q W
W QQ
❑ LL
O
Q W
W
N
0 w
= U
W N
D
QV
w
cc iz
U ?
6
tn
2 Z
❑m
U.
0 J
Q
N O
W W
t[
0
a z
Dc
Q J
o
� W
O y_
w ❑
M
Aso
n n
30
GO
F
c
ng
L
L W
U
n=
a5
uig
18
¢oO
J
O�
r
t
N W
O
J w
W �
O�
G >.
W y
J W
J^
L�
O=
r
O
m¢
0 Q
ZX�
vu�
W W
1
m tl
2 �
�U-
xo
W
WO
W
ma
5 6
9
Yc
V
0
S
R
!wiz
E
i
m
� r
U �tl Q
� O L
N
{NL
N 2 W
m
� � s
0
loo
�� DEL. R£Y �� , � • � _
4 ,J
HOB yWAHEHOUSE i �} - 111.
00
1
* r y a
T ;
DEL. ,RIM Y b
�,
TENNS SHOE gVIfREHE)�
4� . �x
s�� S
�� DEL. R£Y �� , � • � _
4 ,J
HOB yWAHEHOUSE i �} - 111.
�
•. �
X ! +`{
. 1 .� � l <:D _ � �. fit; i f
S
L � �' � J'' L yrY N .jA
♦ _
� � �► r � � P y � c pa
t
Y 1
I CRANnR RlcHTER
ALAN B. KAiTz
Z� 0" ,f
J. CaAxaF k CHTSaz
'=0 VON KARMAN AVENUE
SURE 820
IRV;NE,, CALIFORNIA W16
may 1, 1991
7ELMHONE
1711; 455.3888'
0--%'02
Qw
T18j9.t JJX9Ij2j'% " +��
RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9340 Baseline
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
Subj: Hearing On Environmental Assessment and
Conditional 3e Permit 91 -08 - Macias
Dear Sir:
The undersb- ed _`xeby requests that the Planning
Commission continue th.s matter in order that Applicant, Raymundo
O. Macias, be allowed to present additional argument as to the
impropriety of the commission discission of April 24, 1991,
Your courtesy and consideration is this matter is greatly
appreciated.
ppSincerely,
Alan B. Raitz, Esq.
SO-REQUESTED:
i ud ' ti 2 �l -rte'•
RA DO O. .IACIAS, Applicant
D
AL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
T
DATE: May 8, 1991
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
B';: Stever Rosa, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: SOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSBSSMENn AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -08 - MACZAS - .1 raqueat !co allow
retail sales in conjunction with a light wholesale,
storage, and distribution use witW n an ex,a:eting 17,384
square foot building in t1e Induatria2 Park District
(Subarea 5) of the Industr_•al Area Spr-ifL= ilan, located
on the east side of Monroe Corot, north of Jersey
Boulevard - APN: 209- 144 -42.
I. BACKGROUND: At the Planning Commission meeting of April 24, 1991,
the Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for
adoption on the next Consent Calendar.
II. RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of the attached Resolution of Denial.
Re c^ all roit d,
Bra t
W& Planner
BS :SR:sp
Attachments: Exhibit ^A" - April 24, 1991 Staff Report
Resolution of Denial
ITEM A
a]
CITY OF RADTHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 24, 1991
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commis3ion
FROM: Brad Huller, city Planner
BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner
SujJECT: ENVIRO!MENmxr ASSESSMENT = CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -08
- KACIAS - A request to allow retail sales in conjunction
with a light wholesale, storage, and distribution use
within an existing 17,394 square foot building in the
Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the industrial
Area Specific Plan, located on the east side of Monroe
Court, north of Jersey 9oulevard - APN: 209- 144 -42.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Reeues cede Issuanca of a Negative Declaration and
approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow retail sales in
conjunction within an existing Light Wholesale, Storage, and
Distribution Use.
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - Vacant; Industrial. Park (Industrial Aroa Specific
Plan, Subarea 6)
South - Light Distribution Building (attached); Industrial
Park (Industrial Area Specific plan, Subarea 6)
East - Vacant; Industrial Park (Industrial Area Specific
Plan, Subarea 6)
West - Vacant; savers Overlay uistrict (Industrial Area
Specific Plan, Subarea 6)
C. g2neral Plan Desianationu
Project Sits: - industrial Park
North - Industrial Park
South - Industrial Park
East - Industrial Park
West - Industrial Park
tv
D. characteristics: The site is improved with an existing
warehouse building, parking area, and 'Landscaping. To the
ISM-1h, the building shares a common wall with x building on
t;r- adjacent property.
A -2
PLANNING
COMMISSION STAFF R$PORT
CUP 91 -08
- MACIAS
April 24,
1991
Page 2
E.
Parking Calculationsa
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footage Ratio Required Err vided
Warehouse 12,000 1 /1000 12 13
Retail 4,000 1/250 16 16
Office 1,000 1/250 4 4
Total 32 33
II. ANALYSIS:
A.
General.- The Industri.l Area Specl.fic Plan permits retail
saleu in conjunction with Light Wholesale, Storage, and
Distribution operations with the approv,�11 of a Conditional Use
Permit. The primary issues to be concerned wi;ah would be
compatibility of uses and traffic conflicts. Retail sales are
normally discouraged within the industrial area because the
uses typically create more traffic. Also more aignage is
generally preferred than office and industrial uses. Other
forma of retail are permitted with Conditional Use Permits,
including Automotive Salts, Convenience Sales and Services,
and Food and Beverage Sales.
B.
M*cific: The applicant is proposing to use approximately
4,000 square feet of his 17,000 'square foot building for the
retail sale of shoes and accessories. The building primarily
serves as a warehouse and light distribution center for the
owner's two other stores which are located in the cities of
Walnut and Corona. The warehouse operates between 8 a.m. and
5 p.m., while the retail °business, which is alreae7 in
operation, is open from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. Deliveries are made
an average of twice per weak. The building is located on its
own parcel and has its cvim driveway and parking lot;
therefore, it does not appear that traffic or parking problems
will resi.it from the additional traffic which is typically
crei;ted by retail uses.
The Building and Safety ibnd Fire Divisions have conducted
inspsctions and determined that several modifications dealing
with fire separations and proper exiting are necesssr-I in
order to most the occupancy requirements for a retail use.
Prior to allowing tho rattail use, tLase modifications will be
required to be completed 'to the satisfaction of the Building
end Safety and Fire Divisions.
Three parking spaces are located tr. °.runt of the entrance, one
of which is a handicapped space. xr.a remainder of the parking
is located on the north aide of the building and is separated
fr(a the entrance by a below -grade trucU loading ramp. A
A -3
11
PLANNING COMMISSIOT 'STAFF REPORT
COP 91 -08 - MACIAS
April 24, 1991
Page 3
small concrete path through thu landscaping allows: pedestrians
access from the northerly parking area to the entrance by way
of the loading area.
C. Prooerty Maintenance: The building was constructed in 1980
and, in staff's opinion, could use some maintenance. When the
site was visited is March, several items were noted. Staff
recommends that the Planning Commission require the applicant
to correct the following items:
1. Storage of lumber and pipes on north side of building;
2. Painted signage on western windows;
3. Unpainted roll -up door on north aide of building;
4. Access door should be painted to mL`a? building;
S. Pink neon paivL crash poles at the building entrance;
6. Band painted "Store Parking directional sign;
7. Ducts on roof of building;
S. Peeling, flaking paint on the'building walls.
A number of suggested conditions have been included with the
attached Resolution of Approval to address these issues.
D. Conclusion: Because of the large proportion of floor area
devoted to storage %nd the use of the building as a
distribution point for other stores, it appears that the
industrial area is an appropriate location for this type of
mixed use. If the technical and maintenance issuaa can be
resolved, staff has no seriouo concerns with the proposed land
use.
E. Environmental Assessment: „port ac iew of Part I of the
Initial Study and complatinn of Part II of the Environmental
Checklist, staff Chas found no significant impacts related to
the proposed use.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following
findings in order to approve this application:
A. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the
objectives of the bevelopwent Code, and the purposes of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is
located.
A - /
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 91 -08 - MACIAS
April 24, 1991
Page 4
B. That ttis_,.-- ,Opoeed use will not be detrimental to tY:e public
health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
C. That the proposed use complies wJ.th each of the applicable
provisions of the IL4ustrial Area Specific Plan.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: The item has been advertised as a public hearing
in the Inland Valley Dailv Bulletin newspaper, the property has
been posted, and notLves have been sent to the adjacent pvoperty
owners within 300 fest.of the project.
V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
conduct the public hearing to determine whether the land use is
appropriate If she Commission can ,support the necessary
findings, conditional approval may be grri;tad through adoption of
the attached Resolution. However, staff would recommend that
approval of the Use Pirmit be deferred pending resolution of the
Building and Safety issues by the applicant.
Rea pe ly subm tted,
Bra ulle -
City Planner
BB: SR: sp
Attachment` Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Location Map
Exhibit *'" - Floor Plan
Exhibit "D" - Site Plan
Resolution of Approval
11
h -
a
SWECT PROPERTY:
8711 Monroe Ct
Rancho Cucamonga, eA 91730
,APPLICANT:
Del Frey Tennis shoes Warehouse
8711 .Monroe ct
Rancho Cacamonga,CA 91730
The intended use of this building is primarily warehousing and light distribution
of tennis shoes. The total ,square footage of this building is 18,536 sq ft. Approx-
imately 13,000 sq ft will be• used as warehouse and offices. Approximately 4,000 sq ft
is intended for use of retail sales for the tennis shoes.
Business hours, for our distribution are from 8am to 5pm. The retail store could be
from 10am to 7pm. The number of employees at this location would be approximately
10.
Amhk
Del Reyt:Tennis Shoes has two other retail outlets one in the city of Walnut and
another in Corona. These stores need to be restocked_111most daily, so this is where
our distribution canes in .
The reason we are requesting CUP at t_° lex- ation, is that the retail business
would help out in our lease payment. In checking the area we see no other footwear
business that we would bev interrupting.
We also have ample parking spaces - a total of 32 including 1 handicap parking spare
and 2 truck delivery wells.
"Irly Off' i ' C 04 JUCAMONGA
PLANNING- DIVISION
EXHIBM
SITE
MY OF
PLANNING- DWISION
IFA 61,
11
11
rmm. Cue Cli-Qpi
TrrLE: LCW-=,2,,
IE SCALE: 400'
i
ILxHmrr.
Iq -7
_ !MAP
P3
ul,
31.
1
ter. • Id
. us be
Aftk
1^ � 7- i r" • Zp �
1�
f4
.41:00
ts
. i � ��•� � (1� I�r ®p N�6 ML
(Sift u - _ ' 16Tts ,
jo
x
W I
a
� 2 rii
S2
H
w
� w m
s7 T
U
to -r K
L
� Q�e
w
~wn�C cL
�70
m
-i
q O CpC
r
0
Ltj
D
CITY OF C MG �UCAMONGA
PLANNING- DIVISION
J
E
rt
10
O
S
y�� O
Ag�
Y
STEM: f Up 44 -os
TM E: FLT Puw - N
EXHIBrr: D SCALE: -"
-T
11
LOP%DUJtr DOCA$
C.a`L..P O�eO.S
J
E
rt
10
O
S
y�� O
Ag�
Y
STEM: f Up 44 -os
TM E: FLT Puw - N
EXHIBrr: D SCALE: -"
-T
11
C
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PT,ANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 91 -08 FOR RETAIL SALES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A
LIGHT WHOLESALE, STORAGE, AND DISTRIBUTION USE LOCATED AT
8711 MONROE COURT IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT
(SUBAREA 6) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 209- 144 -42
A. fReG tats.
(I) Raymoundo O. Macias has filed an application for the issuance of
the Conditional Use Permit No. 91 -08 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the ,subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 24th of April 1991, the Plannina,:,Commission of. cne City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded ,said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in follows:
1. This - ommission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, "-.rt A, of this RosAution are true and correct.
2. Based upon suba_antial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing on April 24, 1991, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follow*:
(a) The application applies tv property- which is located at
8711 Monroe Court with a street frontage of 170 foot and lot depth of 736 feet
and is presently improved with an industrial building, parking lot, and
landscaping; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant,
the property to the south of that site consists of a warehouse, the property
to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is vacant; and
(c) The building is located along the south and east property
lines and has three parking spaces, a loading ramp, and landscaping on the
street side, as well as 30 parking spaces on the north side of the building.
A /0
PLAXNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO..
CUP 91 -08 - MACIAS
may 8, 1991
Page 2
r1
Lw
(d) The application contemplates a 4,000 square foot retai
sales floor area and 13,000 square feet of warehouse and related offices; and
(e) The' application utates that distribution (i.e.,
loadinq /unloading) activities will take place from 8.00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
daily, and retail activities will take place ?nom 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; and
(f) The site was designed and intended for manufacturing and
light distribution uses; hence, a depres ed loading ramp -faces tho street
frontage which separates the public entrance from the main parking lot. As
proposed, the site plan would require customers to traverse through the
loading ramp area to access the public entrance. Such a site c:;nglguration
will contribute to a dangerous pedestrian pattern in conflict with the heavy
truck traffic associated with the industrial use; and
(g) The 22 percent of floor area proposed to be devoted to
retail sales is inconsistent with the intent of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan to limit retail in the industrial area to retail which is incidental to
the primary industrial uns; and
(h) The proposed a.,Lw is currently not in conformance with
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code building and fire &afety standards. Several
modifications to the building are necessary to comply with the exiting and
occupancy requirements of retail usta under the Uniform Building and Fire Code.
3. Based upon the ;xurstantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 :end 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) Thit the proposed use is not in accord with the General
Plan, the objectives of the industrial Area Specific Plan, and the purposes of
the district in which the site is located.
(b) That the proposed use will be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
(e) that the 7-oposed use doer: not comply with each of the
applicable provisions of t;a DaveloyawAt Code.
A. Based upon the findings and conc usiors set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application.
S. The Secretary ti this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY DE MAY 1491.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY JF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
/
U
PLANNING COMY.ISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 91 -08 - MACIAS
May S, 1991
Pagb 3
BY:
Larry McNiel, Chairman
ATTSST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify tha£ the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a rogular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the Sth day of May 1991, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 8, 1991
r-
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
`.)M: grad Buller, City Planner
Sc.,tt Murphy, Associate Planner
Q SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -42 - PITASSI
e !1 DALMAU A request to develop a 45,150 square foot YMCA
facility on 4.8 ",, acres of land within the Recreational
Commercial District of the Terra Vista Planned Community,
located on the east side of Milliken Avenue, north of Church
Street - APN: 227- 151 -13.
j I. BACKGROUND: On April 26, 1989, the Planning Commission originally
approved Conditional Use Permit 88 -42 for the development of the
YdCA facility. Since that tine, construction documents have beer.
completed but no further Processing of the plans has been conducted
due to the lack of available funds to construct the YMCA building
and related site improvements. The applicant has been exploring
other options to develop the site, including phased construction of
the facility. The YMCA is located on the south end of the Milliken
Park which Is nearly completed. As a result, the applicant is
requesting a one year extension of time. Extension3 may be granted
in one year increments up to a maximum of five years from the
original approval date.
II. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the proposer]. Time Extension and has
compared the proposal with thu development criteria outlined in the
Terra Vista Community Plan. Based upon this review, staff has
determine," that the project is consistent with the development
standards for the Recreational Commercial. designation of the Terra
Vista Community Plan. The project is also in compliance with the
objectives of the General Plan.
III. RECOMMENDWTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant
a one extension of time for Conditional Use Permit 88 -42
through adoption of the attached Resolution.
Reap lly subm!Jtted,
0,
Br er
City P anner
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Location Map
t, Exhibit 'C" - Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations
Resolution No. E9 -60
Resolution of Approval for Time Extension for CUP 88 -42
ITEM B
Ptassi•Dolmou
Mr 23 Peter J.Pitass,NA
Architect
Nei F'#4 Alain Dalmau, A.IA.
March 27, 1991 7180110 111112:112126441516 Architect
Mr. Scott Murphy
Associate Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planting Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Subject: Conditional Use Permit 88 -42
Rancho Cucamonga YMCA
Dear Scott:
The C.U.P on the above referenced project will } N evoiring on
April 26, 1991. on behalf of our client, we are requesting a
time extension of one year. The Construction Documents have
been completed, however, the acquisition of funding for this
project has delayed our start date.
If you have any questions .leaee call and we thank you in
advance for your assistance.
Very Truly Yours,
Pitassi•D itec s
t , AIA
Architect
PJP:cas
cc: Mr. Tom Stretz
EXHIBIT A
9267 Haven Avenue, Suite 220 a Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 + (714) 98&1361
A
e
k tF i
11
Ease Line Ave.
z.►_ \,+I
NORTH
• Y E: CU? 88-4-2
TITLE: - 1.Tli�de9��
EXHIBIT: SCALE: none
11
E7
NORTH
E
11
,ail
tITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION i3-
ITEM: CUP U42
TITLE: U SCAPE PLAN
EXHIBIT: D SCALE: n`
�__-
RESOLUTION NO. 89 -60
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -42 FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF A 45,150 SQUARE FOOT YMCA FACILITY LOCATED
ON 4.83 ACRES OF .AND WITHIN THE RECREATIONAL COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT OF THE `ERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY ON THE EAST
SIDE OF MILLIKEN, NORTH OF CHURCH STREET, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227- 151 -13.
A. Recitals.
(i) Nest End YMCA has filed an application for the issuance of the
Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -42 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application ".
(ii) On the 26th of April, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing on April 26, 1989, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby spc_-cifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located on the east
side of Milliken Avenue, approximately 649 feet north of Church Street with a
street frontage of #465 feet and lot depth of 1535 feet and is presently
vacant; and
(b) The vacant property to the north of the subject site is a
futl park and community trail, the property to the south of that site is
vacs:�t, the vacant property to the east is vacant and zoned for multi- family
resida:ntial, and the vacant property to the west is an apartment complex under
construction.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
13-7
PLANNING CWMISSION RESOLp•-rON NO. 89 -60
CUP 88 -42 - PITASSI DALMAU
April iv, 1989
Page 2
Agh
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the
General Plan, the objectives of the Development
Code, Terra Vista Community Plan, and the
purposes of the district is which the site is
located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the
conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious tr properties
or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code
and the Terra Vista Community Plan.
A. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance wig the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a 3egative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every cnnditior set forth below and in the attacimd Standard
Conditions attachad hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planning Division
1. A painted metal coping trim shall be utilized to cap.
the top of the parapet on the gysnasiwm facades.
2. This approval is granted subject to the approval of
a land use amendment to the Terra Vista Community
Plan. A Terra Vista Community Plan <mendsent shall
be submitted and approved by the Aty Planning
Commission and City Council prior to issuance of
building permits. The Amendment shall revise the
land uses in the area around the YMCA facility.
3. A minimum of 181 parking spaces shall be provided on
site. At least one (1) additional parking space
shall be provided on the final plans.
4. Sandblasted and painted concrete column bases shalt
be used on the building elevations to the
satisfaction of the City Planner.
Engineering Division
1. Construct Milliken Avenue full width from Base Line AML
Road to Foothill Boulevard, including a landscaped IV
median and the traffic signal at the
Milliken/Foothill intersection.
HE
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 110. 89 -60
CUP 88 -42 - PIiASSI DALMAU
April 26, 1989
Page 3
qP
Parkway improvements beyond the project boundaries
may be deferred until development of the adjacent
property.
2. Northbound rigitt. turn deceleration lanes shall be
constructed south of both project driveways. The
lanes shall be 230 feet long (including 90 feet of
taper) and 11 feet wide.
3. The parkway and median island landscaping on
Milliken Avenue shall conform to the results of the
City's beautification study for Milliken Avenue.
4. Construct the following Master Plan Storm Drain
facilities:
a. Line 1 from Deer Cicnk Channel to Milliken
Avenue,
b. Line 5 -1 withii Milliken Avenue, and
c. The retention basin in La Mission Park, located
at the northwest corner of Church Street and
Elm Avenue.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADAPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL, 1989.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
ATi
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commiss) )f the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
Ilk on the 26th day of April, 1989, by the following vote -to -grit:
IV
13-5
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89 -60
CUP 88 -42 PITASSI OALMAU
April 26, 1989
Page 4
AYES: COMMISSIONERS; CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY
•I
�-In
t
U
L
U
4-
0
d
a
w ^Y�1N� .�Q ,i���� „Y•• yyYLOa
v 2 Y it C
t�OC yl�Y _C�t yt rVq °:L�3:
Y b ii G s��1 �H w1•�Yy Y�HY LN
Eiji! Y w
5�« y�W Lx9VO.
o
Irk
_S
lot jib
$ AYE ; C �s« I«Ey1 p,
INN 4
fiy
O MMI IR _`/4�p1 YfI
E �C
C m
o �
d
CL v N i
w a
� w
u
+LY9yyy�yN
`aQ
a°
3 p Y M y.0 u
.i e
'
J
L a
$ �+uB
TL
�p�Y r
. ".1M�y1 tiv �NYp pp
Yi•��aV��L.
r
X�
t
U
L
U
4-
0
d
a
w ^Y�1N� .�Q ,i���� „Y•• yyYLOa
v 2 Y it C
t�OC yl�Y _C�t yt rVq °:L�3:
Y b ii G s��1 �H w1•�Yy Y�HY LN
Eiji! Y w
5�« y�W Lx9VO.
o
Irk
_S
lot jib
$ AYE ; C �s« I«Ey1 p,
INN 4
fiy
O MMI IR _`/4�p1 YfI
E �C
C m
o �
d
CL v N i
w a
� w
Y Y `
1
^1
Y
�
J
TL
Y Y `
1
^1
N
s
lit
s
H
V
a
6 y y » p 3 z j -..a
X. IM .dam^ +Ya8
3 »_3•
0: g �SSa iizz e$53
=.s Hue �e.�.��
D
Via O M `
V
K -. 31 04 x
S��k a «yo�b n a�. —
'ie
A »MIN
,IN 11pi 14
y5-
4 ■��� Iii N{Z b� W��YN L�i�l�.
YI 1i A
Y tl V s
Y3 ZI i3:
3 _ -
b3 �-
X32 S
Ti O - #s
#� jai
a «
N$ ig
: If i =1 IM
R
2
5
°3�S
5r
y
3»l
zc-Qyvpfk
SCE$
^s
RV=
lit
IsHE
a
Phi
ills!
i
WN#
1i
I
A
I
♦
ills]
♦
1 I4
11
j
I
AS
U
s s: 3 »� r
a L% s�c
S
ii � 2S is i''S..S �Y i`
fi .�. e:� o o.'�C
Zvi Mu
• r
is � _ sss$M is m�
'alai#
hh P
i
1.11 go 9� 3pp3
=#' `� s
h[Fib-1 i a vt -4
r= •�
aY n ; M-m! i.�' K mills 3 I P�
r r d ii ° S'.
x1 I x I xi i rI I r3-/2-
R
°a
N
LI
H
Eo %b if suuC`b..ue44•'��y5 CYST, °e
�`J; �O. �V eC> f�Y ^q�.GM yO ~O ^u� CO \� �Y�
�b G� \e. � �Q +w yL�016wV ��6 `1►. �� ^fie � w�
U.Eo„' Q� Eo S��wSE.os iEy� °''ip`E
^spy ss
tyY O� • Y7 YY. N�OY4li CCtl Lw:. C wC
`eMMO�a=
# e E=
1-i ' C
:1 N b
zsw�a f3$� := = o`r`s V
pL' o� t _yON-�p tali g a
9 off$ Sig �xl: #» _t -!
L s^
+` i <�! < �'»yo sAIII!
iI
xl kl I I xl
ill Ell ar E
#:
"
ss �I -3 sT
b �p
isa I 3S
�.s =dam °��f.
V N
Y
Big
=Oil
a Z31 It
s g r :_l _ a
gt�
Irk;
• � 3y
� 'III ..� � �� •-��� �Y�g,� —�
3�_ Its s=a- r-.:
d M • s "��L•p`
XI •I �I �� '� � Nl
6 —/3
W
6iYtlA
■ Y
�6 e�}2
lit
ne
i
ail
2
>
I
H
l
I
i ga
� v
Y
x y
°�`o
B
!all
I H
iiw
fl_
Op n�p
Mi
fVa EE SS
O=
Y2 •
V C V
. p
;.pp
;ar
q -yob
at! !
N
eM
aj4OS a
��py
Oy�
Y
N
L+,IY�SlM
j �e
Yom.
'F_J
$a
N
�
3INafi
6iYtlA
■ Y
�6 e�}2
lit
N4
i
ail
2
>
I
H
l
I
i ga
INS
!
fl_
{d
i
102
.Y
+}
3�
N
eM
aj4OS a
��py
Oy�
'j_(��
VT
N
y
i7w
j �e
ZE
8 _8a o
Old 6N�� Y ; O dN
p�u` L -•= .wig C V�
V o'" Ni& ^ °�
wed% ..:3°:
s
� V
g r:?s I � ` >
Oi
V` Q 5
Y N �
P. � °s all
S1gs
z$�a
a
d �
a;
Y �
ja
7 •
M G
f_
kit
2
� 3;
TL_
L
r
M
NOW�
5
N A
s
Y
f
U.
O
.e
�g
Y Z
has
it
Ma-
gp
•
rte+
:11
sit;
sei
WK L
Rft
l hx
Hit
3;°
34, ;a
L 6
d n
E
U
RI
b
H
V
W
11
1]
n1 4 a
` epN O Yy
e ^oa4 ii
a� iqqq �B
p� ^tty �s LLLiLLLi` e � �cY
mI hI
Igo =:
6 M P '°p• MAO/ i s o19 °q.
IS
• Y �3 syS$�gr� S'33X?=
Ads
.._ "q$�/ g -" ®M _ ,s • - Ilia- ill; r
WW� WY A
6 4 Va V
i x I
G is
L69
N
'a
Y �
y
V
y Ny
r J
a
O
6
_
=Y�qj
O
e
«
Y s
w
�x0r �e
s
w
NOyO.G�
6 6 V O P Q
n1 4 a
` epN O Yy
e ^oa4 ii
a� iqqq �B
p� ^tty �s LLLiLLLi` e � �cY
mI hI
Igo =:
6 M P '°p• MAO/ i s o19 °q.
IS
• Y �3 syS$�gr� S'33X?=
Ads
.._ "q$�/ g -" ®M _ ,s • - Ilia- ill; r
WW� WY A
6 4 Va V
i x I
G is
L69
N
'a
U
y
V
y Ny
r J
a
O
6
Yy
~yC
O
e
«
Y s
w
u
s
w
O `
a bC 9
M�
22 p
a
s
IL
$
IN
O
aZ ��•g•
V O �(
e� e
O
N
WW�
Y
n1 4 a
` epN O Yy
e ^oa4 ii
a� iqqq �B
p� ^tty �s LLLiLLLi` e � �cY
mI hI
Igo =:
6 M P '°p• MAO/ i s o19 °q.
IS
• Y �3 syS$�gr� S'33X?=
Ads
.._ "q$�/ g -" ®M _ ,s • - Ilia- ill; r
WW� WY A
6 4 Va V
i x I
G is
L69
N
'a
U
y
V
N
O
6
x
u
e
«
s
S
L
u
s
v
s
IL
$
n1 4 a
` epN O Yy
e ^oa4 ii
a� iqqq �B
p� ^tty �s LLLiLLLi` e � �cY
mI hI
Igo =:
6 M P '°p• MAO/ i s o19 °q.
IS
• Y �3 syS$�gr� S'33X?=
Ads
.._ "q$�/ g -" ®M _ ,s • - Ilia- ill; r
WW� WY A
6 4 Va V
i x I
G is
L69
\ t
Y'
v
W
I 211422A 2 r s I
Yi Qc eeP �p `p�yyjy s y 0�6�y Y Z
59.3 `
Im
us M
Spa Og E t'8 ^�
4o v
��s s. aa� g a l§
v�1� ST Bb`s a- z a..
4981
• O« � Y M
^1 lit W�
MV^
assr N, Q{,1 .". WML411 i d� e0
A 4 a
XI l l I ,,I X1 4 Y-1 Y-1
y �
so 1i
IL
r
s
3
3 3
T
R!i 3
m$
M
,A
a
I
o g
Y C
y`lY
s, e
4r $
~� k
s �
.a 's
s� m
gY 3
Ia
C ^'
A p �
y 9 4
o a
• Y� �O14
l t
a Say as y
°
11
Ll
1
V�
V
W
11
E
s : --
s°
i • � S
Q
S ^ M
�w
ag g$g
M
• a
3 =`0
•� gar
0 1l _ L
C Y •
a S��• Ana
V
%Ci XI
� rrtl
tl -
MR w►
a r
s� ^-
N
.1 W2 r a
RD
L
si
a
`a
14 i M O b q
"'►. 1 il)l
6 -/7
D=
`.is
ee44�=6q�
a
TL
0
aka
air.
W3
e
�
s
•
I
Adak
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C^"'lISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION
FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -42, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.
OF A 45,150 SQUARE FOOT YMCA FACILITY ON 4.83 ACRES OF
LAND WITHIN THE RECREATIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE
TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE
OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, NORTH OF CHURCH: STREET, AND MAILING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227 - 151 -13.
A. Recitals.
(i) Pitassi- Dalmau Architects has filed an application for the
extension of Conditional Use Permit No. 89 -42 as t ,scribed in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, tk3 subject Time Extension
request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On April 26, 1989, the Planning Commission adopted its
Resolution No. 89 -60 thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and
time limits, Conditional Use Permit 88 -42.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ra +solution
have occurred.
E. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the Uity of Rancho Cucamoraa as follows:
1. Thin Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correcr.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission,
including written and oral staff reports this Commission hereby specifically
finds an follows:
(a) The previously approved Conditional Use Permit is in
substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, Specific Plans,
Ordinances, Plans, Cedes. and Policieul and
(b) The e-- tension of the Conditional Usa Permit will not cause
significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specific Plans,
Ordinances, Plants, codes, and Policiesl and
(c) The extension of the Conditional Use Permit is not likely
to cause puRlic health or safety problems; and
(d) The extension is within the time limits prescribed by
IS state law and local ordinance.
/3-
y
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TIME EXTENSION CUP 88 -42 - PITASSI- DALMAU
May S, 1991
Page 2
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragFaphs
1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Timm Extension for:
Conditional
Use Permit Applicant Expiration
88 -42 Pitassi- Dalmau April 26, 1992
Architects
4. The Secretary to this Commission *hall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY Or MAY 1991.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. HcNiel, Chairman
ATTSST:-
Brad Huller, Secretary
1, Brad Buller, Secretary of tha Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
rsgularly introduced, passed., and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Pl -Aming Commission held
on the 8th day of May 1991, by the following vote -to -wits
AYES: COWHISSIONBRlt:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABOM: COM ISSIONERS:
11
11
11
I'll
V111 V1' lYl11�V11V VV V<111V1. VC1
STAFF REPORT
Q) i
V �
DATE: May 8, 1991
TO: Chairman and Members of tti Planning Commission
FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant EOiineer
SUBJECT: VACATION OF A PORTION OF VINCENT AVENUE INCLUDING THE
request to vacate
W portion of ncent venue rEl tiding the adjacent 10 -foot
wide sidewalk easement, located north of Jersey Boulevard,
east of Red Oak Street APN: 209 - 144 -27
I. BACKGROUNDlANALPSIS
On October 1, 1981, Parcel Map 6911 was recorded and a portion of
Vincent Avenue including a half cul -de -sac street was dedicated to
the City as shown on Parcel 2. On June 16, 1988, Parcel Map 10237
was recorded subdividing f-arcel Map 6911, including two other
parcels. On Parcel Map 10237, &n additional 10 -foot wide sidewalk
easement was dedicated to the City adjacent to that portion of
Vincent Avenue shown on Parcel Map 6911. Under Preliminary Review
90 -38, it was determined that said portion of Vincent Avenue will
no longer be a cul -de -sac and the sidewalk easement will no longer
be needed. Instead there will be a new alignment of Vincent Avenue
between Jersey Boulevard and Arrow Route and a 66 -foot wide right-
of-way will be required on Vincent avenue.
The subject street right -of -way vacation is approrn°(mately 30 -feet
wide and 340 -feet long and the sidewalk easement is approximately'
10 -foot wide and 340 -feet long and located north of Jersey'..
Boulevard and south of Arrow Route respectiveiy.(See Exhibl,;
"9'°.) 'The subject proposed vacation is unir;►proved.
Engineering is presently processing an irrevocable offer of street
dedication, 33 -feet wide measured from the centerline of that said
portion of Vincent Avenue. This irrevocable offer..' of street
dedication will replace the subject proposed vacation
ITEM C
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
VACATION OF C, PORTION OF VINCENT AVE
INCLUDING 10 -FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT
May 8. 1991
Page 2
.'_. RECOMENDATION
Staff recorme,nds that the Planning Commission make the findings
through minute* action that, the subject proposed vacation °ionforms
with the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City
Council for further.-processing and final approval.
Respectfully submitted,
Dar. James(
Senior Civil Engineer
DJ:WV:dlw
Attachments: Legal Description (Exhibit "A ")
Site Map (Exhibit "B" and "C ")
V
c -2
u
�7
E X H I B I T "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF VACATION
THAT PORTION OF VINCENT AVENUE OF PARCEL 2 AS DELINEATED ON
PARCEL MAP NO. 69111 RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 68, PAGES 41
AND 42, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STAT -- OF CALIFORNIA
TOGETHER WITH A 10 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK EASE�LYMM AS DELINEATED
ON PARCEL MAP NO. 10237, RE00RDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 128,
PAGES 16-18, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AM STATE. THE EASTERLY
LINE OF SAID''SIDEWALK EASEMENT IS CONTIGUOUS WITH THE
WESTERLY LINE OF SAID VINCENT AVENUE.
�f -3
Y
� 1?Rokv` ROUTE
P,4RCEL /0
OF /°M 10207
�jmdgsE?- BL LID,
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGDMMtIcNG DIVISION
C —q
r-- a'z0 `ST• Ot�D /CAT /_�1/(!
PER PM ,v911
PER PM 10237
ARZ4 TO BE V,4CATEI>'
N
rmt
T : _Yir✓cgvr.4YE
vw sA- -W4&wr
E`HmIT: `v Q ,'
ARROW RCUTE
t
Q
W
19,4RCEL . /0
C.'F "M, 10037
a "ImmE voc4al H
j - DEO1cl4r1ON
✓EASE?°G VD.
CITY Cj N
RANCHO CUCAMON'GA
OJENGMEERLNG DM91I N
V- /08
ft
11
F3
C1rrf OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 8, 1901
TO; Chairman and Members of Planning Commiss$ 11
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMEliTAL FSSESSMENT ANC__ INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 91 -03 - CITY OF RANT= CUCAMONGA - A riquest to
amend the Industrial '=as Specific Plan by adding swap
meet and ex"ensive impact commercial use ant' their
development criteria within the Specific Plan area. Staff
recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued
from April 24, 1991.)
I. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: On April 24, 1991, the Planning Commission
reviewed Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 91 -03 and directed
staff to modify the text of the amendment on the following issues;
A. Outdoor Swap HA Use Swap Meets are listed in the Industrial
Area Specific. Plan as a typical use under the Extensive Impact
Commercial zategory. The Planning Commission directed staff to
prohibit outdoor swap masts within the industrial area based
upon the problems experienced in other akmmunitias; including
traffic impacts, off -site parking impacts, Froperty maintenance,
aesthatica, and security. Staff wuld recownend modifying this
definition of Extensive Impact Commercial to delete any
reference to flea markets, ctdcor suction sales, or swap meet
activities.
B. Parkinv: Originally staff reccmmsnded a parking ratio of 1
parking space per 1SO square feet. The Planning Commission felt
that 1 space per 100 square feat was more appropriate based upon
the experiences of the city of Santa Ana. Staff has sint-e
revinad the Ordinance of approval to require 1 parking space peor
100 square feet (see attached Ordinance).
�.. Entertainment Pnrmslt: Any type of ancillary entertainment in
association with the use shall *e subject to those conditions as
identified within the Entertainment Ordinance. Entertainment,
as defined by thQ Ent * -,tainment Ord- nance, will continue to be
subject to those regula ',one. Other forms of amusement, such ae
'Riddle" rides, wou;.d f regulated through the Conditional Use
Permit process.
ITEM D 1
PLANNING MJKHISSION STAF-7- REPORT NO.
ISPA 91 -03 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
May 8, 1991
Page 2
D. Cade Enforr-,'aent: 5 u Commission expresmed concern with the
potential cost to the City for extraordinary investigation to
manitor and respond to problems (a-q. traffic-, parking,
security, etc.) that may occur as a result of i,ndoos
wholesale /retail use. Staff is continuing tv Investigate, with
the City Attorney's office, the various regulatory me¢hanisma
(i.e., licensing) that may enabla the city to recover these
costs. Such a regulatory provision would requiz9 action by the
City Council.
II. RECOMMEh3ATION': Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of this amendment and issuance of a Negative
Declaration by th6 city Council through adoption of the attached
Resolution.
Rae lly ■
Bra er
City P nner
BB:ALH,sp
Attachmertmt Exhibit 'A" - April 24, 1991 Planning Commission Staff
Report
Pesolution of Approval
Ordinance
D -2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
,.r
DATE: April 28, 1991
To. Chairman and Members of tie Planning ComrAssion
FROM: Brad Eu1Snr, City Planner
BY. Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
SU£JECT: SKVIRONMENTAL ASSE: $MENT AND IND3ji^.TRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDHENI 91 -03 - CITY, OF RANCfIO _WOZIONGG A request to
amend the Industrial Area Specific Plan by adding Swazi
Most (Outdoor) and Indoor wholesale /Retail Commercial use
and their development ori':aria within the Specific Plau
area. Staff recommends sssuance of a Negative
Declaration.
1. ACTION Rt'OUESTEDT Review and approval of the land use definitions
for Outdoor Swap meet and ,Indoor wholesale /Retatl Commercial
within various subarea of the;InducGrial Area Specific Plan (IS?)
and associated developa,4nt ,ritvria.
SI. BACKGROUND., In recent mcaths- the Planning Division has been
approaahad by several companies interested in estaklishing swap
meet facilities within the City. Swap Meets are,.cur,-gnt!y 'list.I
as a typical use under the "Extensive Impact. Cc-,n .1sial" category,
which 3s only allowed within the Heavy Industrial zone. Subarea 15
(See Attached Exhibit,, "A "). In ad,. i.;n to .e lack of
definition of the term "swap meet," there wwl*e Ao specific
development criteria identified within the ISP, On January 9,
1991, the Planning Commission reviewed 3 approved staff's
request to initiate a modification to the Induntrial Area Specific
Plan to include provisions and standards :fc:-: the "swap meet"
uce. The Planning Commission also directed staff to include the
following inform-",op within thu Amendment:
A. Clarify the definition gf the swap meet use.
B. Identify other industrial subareas where the uae could be
conditionally peraitted.
C. Establish standards and regulations for the swap meet use.
The following report and proposed Industrial Specific Plan
Amendment has been prepar^d for the Planning dommiraiou's review.
D -3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
ISPA 91 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
April 24, 1941
Page 2
III. A3iALYSSS•
A. Swap Meet AistorLt Traditionally, v'wap mast $acilities have
operated outdoors by tho grouping zf a number;: of independent
sellers of both new and used goods within drive - ".n theaters,
ball fitalds, and raceways (i.e. Saaugus Swap meat, and the Rose
Eawl). Such uses operated pw iodically, on vaekends or
seasonally, but primarily on set,wuekerda if the fr- ilities
were not in normal use. As their populavity has grown, co too
have swap masts evolved, changing the chaerLcter of "swap meet"
facilities. The latest trend of indoor maap meets or
" diocount malls" has appeared in cities such as Carson, Los
Angeles, and Santa Ana. In ms It tnatances, these uses involve
"adaptive re -uss" of industrixiL auildinge.
B. gefinitign The "Swap meet" Use is currantty Voted under the
Extensive Impact CommEScirl use wi ^.*in the ISO. Extensive
impact Commercial is def =ned ar the following:
"those which may produce a substantial impact
upon the 3urroundiag ,�sc� uses typically
include but are not iimitsd to. amusement parks,
drivas =in movie theaters, flea markets outdoor e
auction sales, or swa:?_mMgt activitiea,.." ,
T i inclusion of swap meats, flea markets, and out -bor
aeactione together within tho Heavy Industrial subarea of the:
City ap,Qars to be bascad on the traditional view of swap meete
as an outdoor use characterized by temtorA=y 'portable" vondor
stalls that operate on weekends. However, staff's opinion is
that nn expandaad definition of such eommarcial activity is
needed to a&de-ress indoor ouerations, including tho" which may
be semi - permanent or permanent installations. The following
naw land use type definitions are racemmended:
Amn ftjt IOu+tdgor) a :,..kip ities typically
includs, bust are not limited to: the retail,
wbolesale, discount sales, or trade of now or
usmd ge- A within an outdoor area by multiple
vendors. Such activities may be operated year -
round on a t"porary basis, such as on weekends,
or may be a special event. uset typically
include, but are not. limited tot swaf its, .
flea mWActs, and outdoor ructions.
0
D-11
PLANP]IP.iG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
ISPA 91--03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
April 24, 1991 .,
AML Page 3
MW
Iadoor Whelesals /Retail Coe :nrciar,: Activities
typically include, but are limitect to: retail,
wholesale, or discount sales. These types of
b ainesses exclusirlly involve multiple vendors
OF-lling new goods in rmparate, permanent display
structures. Uses typically include, but are not
limited to: discount outlets and indoor swap
masts.
The first definition, Swan Xeets (Outdoort, addresses the
tradit4onat2 activities and characteristics of the use. The
alcond de!°inition, Inaaor Whole!+alsrnetail Cc4ynercial,
6*2r388es tee activities an4 demands assocLated with the
emerging discount commercial activity of consumers. Roth land
uses are similar in that they Yatth nttrmct a high
concentration of people to the site and may generator similar
concerns regmrdIng circulation, parking, secu, %Lty, and
maintenance. It is important, howsvar, to recognize the two
as distinct uses, while establishing the same cr itsria for
both.
C. Locatlan Reonirem2ntq: 'Chia are a number of customer
dynamics related to this Gast. ft.- stheir held indoors or
outdoor., Puch a time will attract x t,.gh concentration of
people to the aite bassa upon .obvurvstioa■ of existing
operations. A concern exproe,i.-d by the Commirsion was
tncompats.billby wits, residential arsaw. She direction of floe
Planning Commission wait to explor% the location of thic type;
of ise within the General Industrial, Minimum Imnaet ii -aavy
Indu- trial, and Hgnvy Inductrial subareas within the Specific
Plan. The General Industrial category provide$ fw the widest
4e
psihle range of light and mcdium industrial tyTwN of activity
including manufact zing, fabrication, and office ussaa. The
Waimum Impact Heavy Indrr7trial group is an area intt•.dn-1 for
heavy iiiduatriab vsea with minima! impacts: to the i6;:,rtunding
area end .nclu..ds a range of aetirs'ies from woodworking
facilities to heavy macniae shop&. Flnaliy, eh." Heavy
Industrial category is intenbed to acaommods..r the heaviest
indnatrial uacs.
fxac Atas !Outdoorls AA outdoor swap east is
likely to have a num< : of ae st%Qtic concerts
related to general apri ;vane, F gna, refuse. and
the display of products. '" caA ly, the,oa times
cater to a more trans - wv ct that
displa. - mad goods are r:, -,crged.
accau F the physical ch,z_ ' I an
outdoor swap mast, this usr r► -. sore
1
S
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
ISPA 91-•03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Apri- 24, 1991
Page 4 is
Industrial and Heavy industrial areas to mitigate
any significant aesthetic effect on the
surrounding ass- Staff recommends allowing
outdoc ap meets in Subareas 9 Znd "_S through
the Conditional Ucu Permit p=oo4se.
Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercials because all
art3vities related to this type of proposed use
would take places within an enclosed building,
aesthetic cchsiderations are limited to slgnc and
property mainten..nce (i.e., tra4`h). Such a use
could be appropriate within the General
Industrial, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial, and
Heavy Industrial a--eat of the Industrial Area
Specific Tlan. Staff. ^ecommends that this use be
allowed in Subareas o, 4, 10, 11, ,.3, 1.:,, and 15
through the Conditional Use Permit proc:eez.
Parking Sta,:dards Another concern expresied by the Commission
related to the issue of parking. Staff surveyed Southern
California cities regardtng the parking rKiirements for swap
meet uses. Staff received a variety of responses to the
survey. The swat conswr�lative p?frking standard .requirements
were reported by Pomona, requires 6 stp_lls per vendor,
end Santa Ana, which rcgip ray 1 parking space per 100 square
feet. .T,os Angeles has the most liberal requiremet..t, 1 parking
space par 500 equar.* foot. Municipalities suc} as Ontario and
the City of - Los Angeles maintained the typical commercial
requirement of 1 space per 200 or 250 square feet for the swap
meet use..
In foraaulating the parkit I stagy � -, a number of key i &eue4
were recognized. In cities with rper' _:.ag swap meozs, the
largeat complaint was the shortage of par).irg facilities. Th-
Orange County Inleor Swap Meat. lccated in the City of Sanc.,
Lna, which maintains a parking ratio of I space Far 100 square
feet, have expeuionced numerous noroative impacts to surrounding
land uuec an a result, of the shortage of parking facilities.
Loitering, litter, and vandalism have also occurred in
adjoining land uses as a result of swap mesa clientele parking
off-site.
The swap meet use is very different from g General Commercial.
or Regional Crcisl use, 'which maintai .a a parking
requirement of 1 parking upaca per 2550 end 220 scZsare feet,
respectively, swap meets tykicaelly wperate as waW ands, bi-
monthly or monthly. Therefore, t`.s parking demand is heavily
concentrated during specific tiri par ods, Even though this Ank
qu
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFY REPORT
ISPA 91 -03 - ^ TY OF RAVCHG CUCAMONGA
April 74 1991
Page ..
wiendment contempl?'tes the location of these facilities within
the industrial area, which utilizes fairly standard peak hours
of operation of Monday through Friday, 7;00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.,
a conservative parking racriiremen should be required to
ensure that negative impad�s are mitigated to mainaain the
aesthetics of surrounding businesses.
Both the Swap Meet (outdoor) and the Indoor /Wholneale Retail
Commercial uses should meet the aame standards. Staff
proposes the following:
1. Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial and Swap Meet
(Outdoor) uses shall meet the parkin - requirement of 1
space per `10 square feet.
E. Additional Submitta Reouirementa: To ensure that surrounding
land uEaso are not negatively impacued, additional filing
requirements shall include a Site Hanagament Plan and a
Traffic impact Study.
1. Site Management Plan: issues such as h%carity and site
maintenance should ba addressed by the applicant to
ensure that adequate services are p.ovided for clientele
and s:?zrounding land uses. Items to be addressed within
the Management Tian are:
a. Trash collection and site maintenre ce
b. Security and safety control meaqu,ces
C. Parking attendants and circulation directors
d. Graffiti removal and building maintenance
e. Personnel management
2. Traffic Impact study: Because of thr, possible ":affic
intensity related to tha user„ the Engineering D'vision
recommends than a Traffic Impact Study should be
submitted to the City Engineer addressing the following
Items:
a. Trip generation
'n. Traffic volume distribution
C. Accsss analysis
d. Internal circulation
e,. Mitigation measures, tf required by the analysis,
shall be shown.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
ISPA 91 -03 - CITY OF RANC90 CUCAMONCPA
April 24, 1991'
Page 6
0
IV. CONDI TIONS OF APPROVAL: In ensuring that all potential issues are
mitigated in considering these types of uses, the following
concerns would be addressed through the Condit_onal Use Permit
process and /or Conditions of Approval:
o Building and safety Department The Building and Safety
Department will require plans to be prepared for the plan
check review process, prior to the issuance of building
permits. The plans must provide com.•nliance with the uniform
Building, Plumbing, and Mecharict' Codes and the Notional
Electrical Code as adopted by the bity.of Rancho Cucamonga.
o Business Licensing - It will be the responsibility o; the swap
meet organizer to provide the Business License Department with
an updated list on a mo..athly basis of all vendors. If the
organizer does not supply the list, they will be responsible
fcr business license payments for vendors. The list should
include the mailing addresser for all vendors.
o Police and Fire Department - Once the file has boon deemed
complete, both the police, and fire departments will be
contacted for written comments regarding any proposed Swap
Meet or Indoor Wholesale /Retail Comw2rcial use prior to
Planning commission review and approval.
o Code Enforcement - The Code 'Enforcement Division will be
notified of any application prior to Planning Commission
review an :approval.
o All signag: in conjunction with the swap meet use will be
subject to the City's Sign OrdinanLv and /or any Sign Program
in place on the project site. In addition, permanent wall
signs and /or monument coigns in conjunction with this type of
uee may be subject to DRC revimu and apprcval.
o The use will be monitored to maintain the aesthetic quality of
tht area and compliance with conditions of approval.
o Any special event, such as a promot::onal sale, will by
conducted by the management Pntity and shall be subject to the
Tempanary Us* Permit process.
V. ENVIROMMENTAL E.SSE£5MR *3 The potential environmental impacts
related to these types of use* are traffic and aesthetics. A
traffic study will be requirsc* to be submitted by any applicant
for this type of proposed usM. The study will identify potential
problema related to the use and pcosible mitigation measures. The
second issue relater to aesthetics. Another submittal requirement
-D " g
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RZPORT
ISPA 91 -03 CITY OF RARCHO CUCAMONGA
April 24, 1991
Page 7
shall be a comprehensive manag went plan that will address iss:.es
such as site maintenance and Urash diaponal. Staff will ensure
that the aeathetc character of the industrial area is maintained
through conditions of approval. In addition, Code Enforcement
shall be notified of these proposals early within the review
proce ®t, and shall continue monitoring of the use to ensure
ce+n;pliance wf ch the conditions of approval. Thersforf, ;, staff has
••.nd no significant impacts as a result of this proposed texs
.:.ondment and recommends issuance of a's gative Declaration.
Vi. FACTS FOR FINDINGSs The proposed project is consistent with the
Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan. The project
will not detrimental` to adjacent proportion or cause
significant advarze environmental impacts.
VII. CORRESPONDENCE: Thin item has been a&zertised as a public hearing
in the Inland Value � lv Dullutin newspaper by an 3ighth page
advert,'.sement.
VI7i. COMMENDATION: Staff recommends that ;:he Planning Commission
recommend rygproval of this amendment and issuance of a rsgativo
D"t.aration by the City Council thrcug'a adoption of the attached
2tesolution.
Aespe y subm ,
Brad H
City Planner
BB: AH:ja
Attachmontsa Oxhibit "A" - Industrial Spec.'fic Subareas Map
Resolution of Approval
Ordinance
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
IWI,USTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -03,
ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR AN INDC.:',,WHOLESALE /°ETAIL
COMMERCIAL USE, MODIFYING THE DEFINITION OF ESTHNSIVE
IMPACT COMMER,.TAL USE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THERROF.
A. Recitals
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has initiated an application for
Industrial Area ;Specific Plan Amendment 91 -03 as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter, in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension
request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On April 24, and continued to May 8, 1991, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public
hearings on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to th- adoption of thi9
Resolution hava occurred.
B. Resolution.
HOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Co..aission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Oommissicn hereby specifically finds that all of the
facts not forth in the Recitals, Part A, ,.f this Resolution are true and
correct.
2. Basel upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission,
during the above - referenced public hearings on April. 24, .and May 8, 1991,
including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically
finds as followss
(a) The propound amendments will not have a significant
impact on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and finding* of the
Initial Study, Part III
(b) The applicatio.: applies to propestiee located within
Subareas 8 -11 and 13 -1s of the i.;dustrial Are& Specific Plan.
(r.) The proposed mandment would be in the best interest of
the health, safety and welfare at the cVLizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
for tha reasons as follows_
1) That the proposed amendment will distinguish between
the Extensiva Impact Commercial use and the Indoor Wholesale /RSta'.l Commercial
use.
T
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NJ.
ISPA 91 -03 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
May 8, 1991
Page 2
2) That' the proposed ameneaneit will establish a parxiiig
criteria of 1 space Per 100 square feet for the Indoor Wholesale /Re' -_tl
Commercial ass within she Industrial Area Specific Plan.
3' Thvt the proposed amendment identifies the additions
submittal requirements of a Management Plan and a Traffic Study to ensure that
surrounding land uses are not negatively impacted.
4) That the proposed amendment will prohibit outdoor
swap meets because of their associated aeothetic, traffic, parking,
maintenance, and security impacts.
3. Based upon the subatantial evidence presented to this
Commission during the above- ,eforenced public hearing and upon the specific
findinga of facts not forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission
hereby finds and concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed amendment is consistent with the
objectives of thrA Industrial Ara Specific Plan, and the purposes oZ the
District in which the site is located.
(b) That the proposal amendment x111 not be detrimental to
the public he %.lth, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties er
improvements in the vicinity.
(4) That the proposed amendment is in compliance with each of
the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Sp %cific Plan.
(d) That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to
the :-jectives of the General Plan or the industrial Area s2scific Plri.
4. This C�smmission hereby finds that the project has been
reviewed and consiear,-d in compliances with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, P*arther, this Commission hereby recommends issuance
of a Negative DeclaraticiA.
S. Based upon the Ctndingu and conclusions cat forth in
paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commi.asion hereby resolves as follows
(a) That the V anning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby recommends riproval 171 Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment 91 -03 per the attachwt Ordinance.
6. The Secretary tz� this Commisaion shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
AFPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS STH DAf OF MAY 1991.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCNC CUCAMONGA
-f2
W]
i'
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
ISPA 91 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCM.ONGA
May 8, 1991
Page 3
BY:
Larry T. XcNiul, Chairman
ATTESTS
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planui$g Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and '4dortad t>y the Planning Commission of the
city of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the PLannina commission held
on the Sth day of May 1991, by the following vote -to -wit-
AYES: COMMISSIGNERSS
Nots, COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT, COMMISSIONERS:
Ell.
E
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT" OF 'RANCHO.)
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIA., AREA SFRCIFIC
ALAN AMENDMENT 91 -03, ESTABLISHING RZG1'LATIONS FOR THE
INDOOR WVOLESALE / =TAIL COMMERCIAL U."-.E, .40DIFYING THE
DEFINITIOV OF EXTENSIVU IMPACT COMMERCIAL USE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPO.RR THEREOF.
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows-
SECTION 1: Part I:I, Table III -1 is hereby amended to read, in words
and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A ".
SECTION 2: Fart III. Table III -2, Land Use Type Definitions, Section
D is hereby added to read, in words and figures, as fo;.`ows:
D. COMMERCIAL USE TYPES
Indoor Wholesale /Retail Came rcial: hativities
typically include, but are not Umi.ted to: retail,
wholesale, or discount sales. These types of
bv-- messes exclusively invol %n multiple vendors
selling new goods in separate, permanent display
structures. Uses typically include, but are not
limited to: discount outlets and indoor swap meets.
SECTION 3: Part III, Table III -2, Subsection !• land use type of
definition for Extensive Impact Commercial is hereby amen 3 to read, in words
and figures, as followat
Extensive Impact Commercial: Activities typically
include, but are not limited to: those which
produce or may produce a substantial impact upon the
surrounding area. Uses typically include, but are
not lini.t /d to, amusement parks, And drive -in movie
theaters.
SECTION 4: Part TIT, c4c2.lon _7 - Subsection P.1, r king and
loading requirements, is hereby Lmnded to add:
g. Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial use: ' apacu per
130 square feet.
SECTION 5: Part 7V is hereby amended to add "Indoor Whol •,ale / Retail
Commercial" ae a conditionally permitted use w?thin $".'.= -^rets 8 -11 and 13 -15.
CITY COUNCIL.'MINANCF NO.
ISPA 91 -03`�—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
May 8, 9991
Pane 2
SECTION 6: This Council finds that this amendment will not adversely
affect the environment and hereby issues a Negative Declaration.
SECTION 7. The City Council declares that, should any prr.visiun,
section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or
declared inpalid by any final court action in a court of competent
jurisdiction,' or by reason of any preemptive legislations the remainiv:g
provisions, se:tionst paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall
_eLain in full force and effect.
SECTION 8; The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its
passage at least once -in ,he Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga., California.
El-
MI
j) — 15
TABLE 111 -1
SUMMA 'V OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA
• PERMITTED USE 4 CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE NOTE: Non - marked Dies Not =e *e.
USE TYPES Lana Use' IP GI GI. GI GI GI IP
IP GI "'w. GI GI IP GI GI HI_tP IP
�•,., Subareas HO 1 22 3 a S o
7 8 9 t0 it 72 13 t3 55 15 ti
ii:ANiJ� kCTURfNG
- 1• I I 1 1-1 1 1
Custom • j • + : • 9. *1 a e 1 1 • • r 1 • • 1 • • -
Li3h: • • • o o •
e • • • a • • • e
Medium ;$I$1$I i•I
t
I 1'1'1.1.1.1 (el•(eJ t
Heavy
e
Minimum Impact Cwvy j I 1 1
I 1 I! 1 i E 1 ' I• I 1
OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DESIGN 3 RESEARCH
+
Administrative & Office • I r. i ♦ I $ a
If I $ I 1 1+1 • 1+1+1 • to!
ProfesoonaL Design Services a #, +,+ ♦
• � $ - %' * 0 } s •
Research Services I I� r I e! S 1 as l•
I s I a 1 a i• - air 1 r j sic l
WHOLESALE STORACE & DISTRI@IaTlrel
T�-
Public Storage , ♦ $ 1 • $ #
• +, it- # I
Light •' • ! r '•. • - • I ♦
' e I • • a • e • a a e •
I$I +wro +i-I
taI *I101 1 101st 1 I.
1:y .
-Heavy f1
• + 1 a
MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILMES (MRFS)
Collection Facilltle.* s• I. 1 4! of
0
Processing Facilltie- ! 4' I
�401 t 14-� Iil +� i
1i
Scrap operation I I
Autamoave Sales
Automotive Service Station
Agricultural/Nursery Supplies i Sordees I
I• I-
I•
# 6
s
0 I
- 1• I I 1 1-1 1 1
Animal Care
Automotive Fleet Storage
; +1
I $'t
+1
• et• +i•I.1
+ T ,
•
+ +
++ I$
$ $ f
I I t t I
Automotiv Rental/Leasing
91 0
+
+
+
Aut omotive /U9ht Truck Repair- Irrnor
!
s ♦
a
Buildinj&Ughting Equipment SuppllesQSalastI
+ I +
•
.L+
s
! I • I '. °•t I
Automotive Truck Repair -Major
�-
• I $
D
♦
• '
( 1
• ' ♦ f 1
1 1+ I
Autamoave Sales
Automotive Service Station
ButOO$$ Support Services
+ I
+
+ I
!
$
$
$
♦1
Coalrmwcatlon Services (•
' $ $ $1 $ +
Building Contractors Office I Yards I
# 6
s
+
+1
e
_
Building Contractor's Storage Yard
• yy�$
• et• +i•I.1
+ T ,
•
$
+1+ ♦' +'+ + + $1
•II$
I
Sul-'.. I AAakttitnanca Strv!c•a I
♦
•
IfivI +�114k
i"',
•
a
Buildinj&Ughting Equipment SuppllesQSalastI
�•!
•
.L+
s
$
♦
�-
Business Supply R•tan a services
1 s
•
s
•
ButOO$$ Support Services
•
!.
+
!
!
++
!
Coalrmwcatlon Services (•
a
f
0
•
Convenience Sales 3 Services
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Eating A Drinking Establishn•nts
•
•
•
*
•
Entertainment
+
♦
+
Eatonsive Impact conarwrelal
Fast Food Sales
+
$
+
$
Financial, Insurance L Real Estate Services
o
$
•
•
Food i Beverage Salts
+
$
i'r
+
+
+
Funeral i Crematory 9srv146a
jj
+
+
Htavy_Egwpm•nt 38iet A Rental$ _.._ _
j i$
$
I +
Indoor WfaMsaWf(t Mail Cc
usidfcadim"M ear• swvfto
Personal Services
Pttroumm b rlrcb Store"
Pecreatkwasi FwAtin
rw.% r tlervic"
Cultural
Eataesivs wo"t ur-ty Facwti•s
Flood ConttoiaVtYity CGcnfdor
Puhlle AssaimMy
Public Safety A utlKy °aen±e•I%
R•tlprow Assembly
+$ $+ + + +t +a +lit• +�� +i#
I I
• • • • Q • 1 +ell ) • •II.1
• + + '� I $ +
BYf {� �
° IP- Induslr!sl Park GI- Genaral Industrial
HO- HATerk Ave. Overlaiy District
.7-'/6,
iiltltl- MInIMUM iAtpact Heavy Industrial
W -ftavy InduOrial
� •�
�
• *Ist•� i0� +1
•
o �
e
_
+ • } + +
o •1.101 .•I.1
• yy�$
• et• +i•I.1
+ T ,
•
$
+1+ ♦' +'+ + + $1
•II$
♦
IfivI +�114k
i"',
�•!
+
+
+ {$+l+
+}
�-
+$ $+ + + +t +a +lit• +�� +i#
I I
• • • • Q • 1 +ell ) • •II.1
• + + '� I $ +
BYf {� �
° IP- Induslr!sl Park GI- Genaral Industrial
HO- HATerk Ave. Overlaiy District
.7-'/6,
iiltltl- MInIMUM iAtpact Heavy Industrial
W -ftavy InduOrial
0
ENVIRQMMNTAL ASSES =NT AND LTINANDA SPECIF*;.'. PLAN X- 'WNDMENT
91 -27A - CITX OF RARga{ C"CrjMONOR - A requd4t to amend various
development standards and design guidslintis for multi - family
residential districts within the tit1wa,.4a Specific Plan
area. Staff recommends iss�zance of a Negative Declaration.
(Continued from April 24, 1991.)
ENVIRO- mt:LTAT, ASSESSMENT AND MW VISTP► RLANNED COMMUttITY
*gHpME&'T 91-02 CITY O -t P"-C O CU2&W_gh - A re^,usst to
amend various development standards and design guidelines for
multi - family residential districts within the Tarra Vista
Planned Community area. Staff recommends issuance of a
Negative Laelaraticn. (Continued from April 24, 1991.)
ENVYRON ZNTAL_ ASSESSMENT AND _ ,'lI9 QW& SLANtiED O -MMURM
A.UnHEN 2.1-02 - CITX O 'gM_C:.1 C1..AHONCrk - A 94= ,isst to
amu:nd various development standard; ..d design guidelines for
multi- tamily residential districts within the Victoria Planned
Cow- Aunitr area. Staff recommends issuan¢ of a Negatii_
Declaration- (Continued from April 2f
The Qlann_ng Commission conducted workshops on April 4, April 11, and April
25, 1991, to review the proposed changes to the multi- family development
standards. An addition:. workshop has bsen scheduled for May 8, 1`91,
following thq regulax p';.v_ ng Commission mosting. In order to allow staff
sufficient, time to prs) .z._ i the amendments, , contiewance to the June 12,
1991, regslar meeting is reiquested,
City
'i BB:NF:gs
ITMfS E,F,G,H
—'
CITY OF RANCHIO CUCAMONGA
Rf "F WEPORT
DATE:
Ma, S, 1991
i
T0:
Chairman and
Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:
Brad Buller,
City Planner
BY:
N-_icy Fong,
Senior Planner
l
SUBJECT:
WjRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT An DEVET&EMENT CODE AMVND14ENT
91 -02
=CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMOU - A request to
amrad various
development
standards and design guidelines for
multi - family
resigantisl
districts. Staff raccsarinds isssuanca of a
Negative Declaration.
(Continuea from April 24,
1991.y
ENVIRQMMNTAL ASSES =NT AND LTINANDA SPECIF*;.'. PLAN X- 'WNDMENT
91 -27A - CITX OF RARga{ C"CrjMONOR - A requd4t to amend various
development standards and design guidslintis for multi - family
residential districts within the tit1wa,.4a Specific Plan
area. Staff recommends iss�zance of a Negative Declaration.
(Continued from April 24, 1991.)
ENVIRO- mt:LTAT, ASSESSMENT AND MW VISTP► RLANNED COMMUttITY
*gHpME&'T 91-02 CITY O -t P"-C O CU2&W_gh - A re^,usst to
amend various development standards and design guidelines for
multi - family residential districts within the Tarra Vista
Planned Community area. Staff recommends issuance of a
Negative Laelaraticn. (Continued from April 24, 1991.)
ENVYRON ZNTAL_ ASSESSMENT AND _ ,'lI9 QW& SLANtiED O -MMURM
A.UnHEN 2.1-02 - CITX O 'gM_C:.1 C1..AHONCrk - A 94= ,isst to
amu:nd various development standard; ..d design guidelines for
multi- tamily residential districts within the Victoria Planned
Cow- Aunitr area. Staff recommends issuan¢ of a Negatii_
Declaration- (Continued from April 2f
The Qlann_ng Commission conducted workshops on April 4, April 11, and April
25, 1991, to review the proposed changes to the multi- family development
standards. An addition:. workshop has bsen scheduled for May 8, 1`91,
following thq regulax p';.v_ ng Commission mosting. In order to allow staff
sufficient, time to prs) .z._ i the amendments, , contiewance to the June 12,
1991, regslar meeting is reiquested,
City
'i BB:NF:gs
ITMfS E,F,G,H
0 , 7 , 01-02 0 P.C. AGENDA MAY 8, 1991 0 2 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Alk STAFF REPCiiiT ,.
ATE: May 8, 1991
T0: Chairman and Members cf the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT 86 -06 - RICHARD STENTON - Modification of
conditions of approval to allow land uses requiring a more
intensive parking ratio than the oni provided for research
and development (1 space per. 35% square feat) within an
existing industrial complex on 13.7 acres of land in the
General Industrial District (subarea 11) of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan, located on the northwest corner of
Buffalo and 6th Street - APN: 229- 261 -78. Staff
recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE P`.57F'MT 91 -03
JAMES PAGE. - The request to establish r "mini-mall"
(swap meet) in a leased space of 103,551 scXar°s feet
within an existing industrial center on 1:3AP .Acres of
land in the General Industrial District, (S-Jarea 11) of
the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 11530 Sixth
Street - APN: 229 - 026 -28. Staff recommends issuance of a
Negative Declaration. Related file Conditional Use Permit
86 -06.
I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
continue these items to the June 12, 1991, Planning Commission'
meeting. The applicants have requested the continuance in order to
address those issues (i.e., parking) identified at the April 24,
1991 meeting during the review of Industrial Specific Plan
Amendment 91 -03.
Res ullg a tted,
qr er.
City anner
WS: ALHsp
Attachments: Applicants' Letters
ITEM I,J
April 25, 1991
Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
Planning Department
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Dear Anna-Lisa:
Carnival Malls i3 applying to the Planning Department of the City
o* Rancho Cucamonga for a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to use the
Existing Facilities located at 11530 SIXTH Street as a MINI -MALL.
Due to a need for additional documentation we are requesting a
week continuation in the C.U.P. process.
S ncere ,
mes Pa e
arnival Malls
JRPila
I
may !, 1991
W Anna -Lisa Hernandez
Assistant Manner
Planning Department
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P,ancho r .ucamonga, CA 91730
R& WF.MMR (C:ARNIVAL. MALI)
Dear Ms. Hermmdf;=
Carmval Man im apptyin3 to the planning department of
aw _ City of Rancho Cummonga for
a Conditional Use permit to use the esisdng facMcs 14
cated et 11530 6th Strew Rancho
Cucamonga as a mini ML
Due to a need for additional documats, we arc
a coatimstion of the C.U.P.
procaen until the June :.2,194'1 PLtntft CMmiMCM h
eetb&
Your courtcay and consideration in the matter will be i
ppreclated.
VereJ`truly yourk
�p
Rickard R. Stznto!2
t
RlS/
26302 Cabot Road, wise M Lama NW11, CA MIN � M4) U34M • FAX (714) 643 -' 814
z00' 3�3tid
Tl -re3 NOISSIW WONJ t'2 *E[ 16. t iN«
I
martin j. jas a, inc.
May 6, 1991
Mr. Steven Ross
Assistant Planner
City of Rahn 'Zio Cucamonga
Planning Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: CUP 91-12 - VCD Arcliitects
Dear Steven:
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
HAND CARRY
CITY OF
.MV 07
AM MH1 in D-A
This letter is to confirm our support for the above- i-eferenced
applicant located at 10743 Edison Court.
Although we have never done business with this firm 1efore, and
believe that in the best interest of the Business Park, the
CUP should be granted.
The addition of an architectural firm is a non - disrupting use; it
up- grades the existing land use, and it ensures environmentally
clean business practices are being conducted. Martin J. Jaska,
Inc., believes this to be in keeping with the desires of the
City and the surrounding neighbors, and urges your recommended
approval to the Planning Commission.
Should you have any questions, or if you wish to discuss this
further, please do not hesitate to call upon me.
Very truly yours,
J. JASItA, INC.
L,
Dale risby
Project Manager
DAF:ta
cc: Chary Dagam - VCD Architects
10723 BELL COURT a RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 s (714) 941 -1500 FAX V1 4) 941 -1300
El
il
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 8, 1991
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Stevan Ross, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -12 - VCD ARCHITECTS - The
request to permit an architect's office within an existing
6,500 square foot building in the General Industrial
District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan,
located at 10743 Edison Court APN: 209 - 142 -67.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of a non - construction Conditional
Use Fermi:: to allow an architect's office within the General
Industrial District.
B. Applicable Regulations: The Industrial Area Specific Plan
permits professi.nal /design services in Subarea 8 subject to
approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
C. Surrounding Land Use and Zonings
North - Industrial Park; General Industrial (Industrial Area
Specific Plan, Subarea 8)
South - Industrial Park; General Industrial (Industrial Area
Specific Plan, Subarea 8)
East - Industrial Park; General Industrial (Industrial Area
Specific Plan, Subarea 8)
West - Industrial Park; General Industrial (Industrial Area
Specific Plan, Subarea 8)
D. General Plan Designations:
Project Site - General Industrial
North - General Industrial
South - General Industrial
East - General Industrial
West - General Industrial
E. Site Characteristics: The site is comprised of an existing
light industrial building, parking area, and landscaping.
ITEM K
PLANNING COMMISSIOW STAFF REPORT
CUP 91 -12 - VCD ARCHITECTS
May 8, 1991
Page 2
F. Parkins Calculations:
Type square Parking
of Use Footage Ratio
Office 1,667 1/250
Warehouse 4,657 1/1000
Total
II. ANALYSIS:
Num„<r of Number of
Spaces
Spaces
Required
Provided
7
7
5
5
12
12
A. General: The applicant, VCD Architects, is c,•-:rently
operating at the site without a Conditional Use Permit, as is
required by the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The applicant
was recently notified of the requirement for a Conditional Use
Permit and subsequently submitted the application.
11
The applicant is proposing to use a light industrial building
as the office for an architectural firm. The office area
totals 1,667 square fee` and includes offices, drafting area,
conference room, and reception area, as well as a small
kitchen and bathroclass. The 4,657 square foot warehouse is
mostly empty, except for material samples and a storage area is
for plans. There arkt presently only four employees working in
the building.
B. Compatibility: The basic premise of all zoning 'is the
separation of incompatible uses. Subarea 8 is zoned for
General Industrial activities and is intended primarily for
industrial type users. Typical uses permitted would include
custom and light manufacturing as well as light and medium
wholesale, storage, and distribution. Secondary uses, such as
professional /design services (i.e., architect's offices), may
be permitted subject to review and approval of a Conditional
Use Permit.
The building was designed for industrial users, which raises a
broader issue of whether more intense office-type land uses,
such as an architecture firm, are appropriate to locate within
areas intended for manufacturing. Office uses generally
generate higher traffic volumes and demand greater amounts of
parking than industrial uses. However, the Planning
Commission has approved such uses in the past. In
August 1990, the Planning Commission approved a Condition"
Use Permit for an accounting office at 10763 Edison Court
which is next door to the subject property. That office
totaled 3,567 square feet and had a warehouse of 4,672 square
feet. A total of 20 parking spaces were required, 3 of which
/ \`ez
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 91 -12 - VCD ARCHITECTS
May 8, 1991
Page 3
were located inside the building. No land use compatibility
problems have been experienced, therefore, staff does not
anticipate compatibility issues associated with an office use
in a General Industrial Area.
In addition to using the building as an office, the applicant
may rent the empty warehouse for storage. Light or medium
wholesale, storage, and distribution, as well as public
storage, are permitted uses within this General Industrial
zone. Therefore, those uses are outside the scope of this
Conditional Use Permit.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all the following
findings in order to approve this application:
1. The proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the
objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is
located.
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare or materially injurio-,.d to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been
posted, and notices have been sent to adjacent property owners
within 300 feet of the project.
V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recd -.rends that the Planning Commission
approve Condiaonal Use Permit 91 -12 through adoption of the
attached Resolution of Approval.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
EB :SR:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Vicinity Map
Exhibit "C" - Location Map
Exhibit "D" - Site Plan /Floor Plan
?>.solution of Approval
R-3
ARCHITECTS
March 2e, 1991
DEPARTMENT 07 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PLhNNING DIVISION
CITY OF RAQNCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT:
10743 EDISON COURT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, T7R 91730
FOR ARCHITECTS OFFICE
Gentlemen,
CHARY DAGAM
PRESIDENT
ROS R. JOVEIAANOS
VICE PRESIDENT
714 -441 -3484
V.C. Dagam owns the above referenced property and is using it
as an office for Architectural and Engineering Design Services.
The office works for 8 hours a day starting from 8 :00 A.M. to
5:00 P.M. Monday thru Friday.
Most of the design and drafting work is done by outside Architect
Engineers- Independent contractors. VCD Architects do not have
a large staff working in office. We are only four (4) people
working at this location. The reason for requesting Conditional
Use Permit is to get Business Licence from the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
If you have any questions please call me at (714) 941 -3484.
Sincerely yours,
V' (0,' � 4
V. C. DAGAM
PRESIDENT
VCD ARCHITECTS
CC: FILE
ewwr te 4 1)
ARCHITECTURE • INTERIOR$z PLANNING 10743 EDISON COURT. hANxHO CUCAMONGk CAUFORNIA 91730-4844 . -4 W 34P1.
E
c
a
4k
C OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DMSION
CITY OF RANCAO- CL.ICAMONGA
PLANNING DrvgS1ON
El
Y
i
71
bL
ui CD
Y
ly, 1 Q
/ P;GV Ra;L2 ,iQ�
OZ
X 7
J
5
u j
s
g $ e1l
� 1
1 � y
U
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TF' CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDI,IONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 91 -12 FOR AN ARCHITECT'S OFFICE IN A LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 10743 EDISON COURT IN THE
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8) OF THE INDUSTRIAL
AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APh: 209- 142 -67.
R. Recitals.
(i) VCD Architects has filed an application for the issuance of the
Conditional Use Permit No. 91 -12 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is ref7rred to as "the application."
(ii) On the eth of May 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concludad said hearing on that data.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to tbl- ,adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution
Now, THERSFORE, it is hereby found, detwrmined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commiscion .vareby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during t *.s above- raferenced public hearing on May 8, 1991, including written
and Oro, staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specit4 crlly finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at
10743 Edison Court with a street frontage of 130 feet and lot depth of
120 feet and is presently improved with a light industrial building, 12
parking spaces, and landscaping; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is a light
industrial building, the property to the south of that site consists of a
warehouse, the property to the east in a light industrial building, rnd tho
property to the west is a light industrial building.
(c) That the application contemplates thw utilization of a
1,667 square feet of an existing light industrial building as offices for an
architecture firm. The balance of the building floor area will be devoted to
warehouse.
J
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CLIP 91 -12 - VCD ARCHITECTS
May 8, 1991
ryi2
(0) The site has 12 parking spaces.
(e) The application contemplates, hours of operation from
8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Fridzy.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during t s above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts se: forth .n paragraphs 1 and 2 abov,t, this Commiss ion "hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
the objective: of the Development Coda, and the purposes of th.) district in
which the site in located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
"a.fare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
A. Based upon the findings and conclusions ,set forth in paragraphs
I, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application aubjett to
each and every condition not forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
5oecial Conditions:
1) Approval of this request shall not waive
compliance with all sections of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan and all other City
Ordinances.
2) If the operation of the facility causes adverse
effects upon adjacent businesses or operations,
including but not limited to, parking, the
Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before
the Planning Commission for the consideration
and possible termination of the use.
3) Occupancy of the facility shall not commence
until such time as all rniform Building Code
and State Fire Marshall regulations have been
complied vita. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District and the Building & Safety
Division to show compliance.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLWION NO.
CUP 91 -12 - VCD ARCHITECTS
May 8, 1991
Rage 3
4) Any signs for the proposed facility shnll be
designed in conformance with the Sign Ordinance
and any Uniform Sign Program for the complex
and shall require review and approval by the
Planning Division prior to installation.
5) The total office square footage shall be
limited to 1,667 square feet, acid the balance
of the building shall be only used for
warehousing /stf:, #Age.
6) The two dead trots is front of the building
shall be replaced with two new 1S- gallon trees
of the same species within 30 days of this
approval.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution..
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS STU DAY OF MAY 1991-
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA
ST;
LArry T. McNiei, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that tho foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly int^:oduced, passed, and adopted by the punning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning commission held
on the 8th day of May 1991, by the following vote- to -wita
AYES: COMISSIGNSRSi
NOES: COMMISSIONSRS:
ABSENT, COMISSIONSRS:
Ll
1 D
CITY OF RANCHOS CCUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 7, 1991
TO: Anna Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
PROM: Barbara Krall, Asst. Engineer
GUCAAfoj
G�`O
C9
r
C
�
a
U;;
I >'
17
SUBJECT: Coyote Canyon School, comments requested by Design Review
Committee
The Engineering Division has reviewed the Coyote School plans and
has recommended the following improvements
1. Construct the nose of the median island at tha Greenwich Street
opening which is now painted;
2. Remove the existing westerly most drive approach aad construct a
new drive approach as shown on the site plan;
3. Construct a drive approach on Mt. View Drive;
4. Remove the two existing maintenance depressions from the median
island within Terra Vista Parkway located between Butterfield
Place and Belpine Place and reconstruct as approved by the City
Engineer.
5. Provide an agreement guaranteeing the construc`,ion of modWed
cul de sacs at the terminus of St. Tropez Drive and Marmande
Place if and when a Planned Community amendment is completed
designating the site as a permanent school site.
Note: Cut de sacs were not required at this time because the streets
will be extended if the school is removed in the future.
BK:iy
11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
T
a, rYY
DATE: May S, 1991
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buyer, City Planner
BY: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistart Planner
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REVILN. 91 - 'J6 - CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT - A
courtesy review of a proposed 10 classroom addition to the
existing school site on 3.44 acres of land in the Terra
Vista Planned Community, located on the south side of
Terra Vista .parkway, west of Belpine ",Place - APN:
1077- 091 -35.
I. ABSTRACT: Under current State law, normal review -and, approval of
school facilities is handled through the Office of the State
Architect. The City's involvement in the review process is
usually limited to approval of the street improvement plans,
leading t the issuance of an encroachment permit, and review of
the proposed grading to verify that adjacent properties are not
being adversely impacted as a result of the proposed grading of
the school site. Through an agreement with the Central School
District, however, preliminary plans are submitted to the City for
a courtesy review.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. Background: The existing Coyote Canyon School site is a
temporary school facility, established between the Central
School District and Lewis Homes. The agreement allows the
school district to utilize the land for temporary school
facilities until 1996, at which time the land will revert back
to Lewis Homes for the completion of single family
development, north of Tract 12671 (see Exhibit "A ").
B. General: The Central School. District is proposing to add 10
modular classrooms, totaling 9,600 square feet, to the
existing temporary Coyote Canyon School site, Currently,
there are 26 modular classrooms on the northeast side of the
site. The 10 additional modular classrooms will he located to
the south of the existing Administration /KLndergarten facility
`.n the south central portion of the site, The District is
also proposing to add 34 parking spaces on the south side of
the project and additional play areas to the west of the site.
ITEM L
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PR 91 -06 - CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT'
May 8, 1991
Page 2
In addition, the district has established a joint use
agreement with the Community Servizes Department for use of
the adjacent park facilities located directly to the west.
C. Desi ski X(eview Commit --Je: The Design Review Committee reviewed
the pzoposal on May 2, 1991. Recommendations shall be
provided in staff's oral report to th* Commission.
III. RECOMMENDA ION: In that the application was submitted as a
courtesy review, no formal action is required by the Planning
Commissiah, The applicant will be present to receive input from
the Commission.
Respeq�ly sub ted,
Bra er
City Planner
BB:AH:js
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location MAP
Exhibit "B" - site Plan
11
1-2
µ71Mµ ?3y0
L
L-3
O`
e
ZI
�ii lam
\ iOlt
e 1
r�Jt
U
i
y �
.:�— .- ..,,_:- �^`�,�.�•
_i
rte` .r—
" j,l
Q ♦t�� ,�,y� 1
v
P
V s
1 t
t
tr,
a
yt
µ71Mµ ?3y0
L
L-3
O`
e
ZI
�ii lam
\ iOlt
e 1
r�Jt
U
te�
�`Play Areas
Additional Parking
e,'0Y0Ie 4A71J Y &--* J
j'f*4F4VXA-P-Y 15,CH4%vL-
-FAe,uXrY
emu
t4
CITY OF AAiktf0,: UCAMONGA
PLANNING- DIVISION
Classroom Addition 0
----------