The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1991/06/12 - Agenda Packet701-0 2 JUNE 12; 1991 P.C. AGENDA 1 of 7-) GL%CAA40� `n Goo c9 ' Cf i it OF ` A z RANCHOCLJCArVK)NGA PLANNI NG CU V g JN AGE Ekk - - U > 1'977 WEDNESDAY JUNE 12 1991 7 :, 1 M 1ANCHG CUCAMONGA CIVIC CEDER J taouNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOP141A 1.. pledge of Allegiance - II. Roll Call CnmmissiRT�pr Chitiea Commissioner Tolstoy ' Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Vallette Commissioner Melcher ° III. Announcements IV. Approval. of Minutes - Adjourned Meeting of April 4, 1991 Adjourned Meeting.of April 18, 1991 Adjourned Meeting of May 2, 1991 May 8, 1991 Adjourned Meeting of May 16 1991 V. Consent Calendar The- following Consent Calendar items are expectW to be routine and non- controversial. They -will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern' over any item, it should be removed for discussion, ai. TIME EXTENSION FOP. DESIGN REVIEW FOR, TENTATIVE TRACT 13566 ROCKSIELD - The request for an extension of a previously approved design review of building elevations and detailed site plan of'�ii4 single family lots of a previously approved tract map .consisting'of 154 single family lots on 67.85 acres ; of land in the Tow Residential District - (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda.Specific Plan, located on the south -side of 24th Street east of Wardman Bullock Road APN: 226- 111 -02, ti 1 ,. B. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE M-ACT 14192 - HIX DEVELOPMENT - The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for' a previously approved tract map consisting of 65 single family lots on 19.7 acres of land in the Low. Residential District (2 -4 dwelling, units per acre), located south of 19th Street between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues - APN: 202- 061 -12, 14, 40, and 44. C. DESIGN REVIEW..,FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13281- COVI13GT0N HOMES - The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 114 lots of a previously approved tentative tract. map` r ', consisting of 199 single family lots r ;;33 acres of land in the Low- 14edium lesiden#!ial District of the Victoria Planned Community' -18- 14 dwelling units per acre),, located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227 - 081 -06. D. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT- 1 564 - AKINS - A - aquest for an extension of a previously pp. 'oved County tract map 'consisting of 132 lots 01,'17 acres of land, located north of S-mmit Avenue and east of Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 226082 -24, 25, and 26. E. TIME. EXTEItTSIMI FOR TF.NTAT.IVE TRACT . 13674 - YfIGHTY DEVET_,OPMENT - .A res dential subdivision consisting of IS single gamily lots on 11.29 acres of land in the Very' Low Residepiisl District (less than 2 'Welling units per acre), located on the vast side Of Amethyst Street north of Valley View Drive - APN: 1061- 401 -03. V1` Public Hearings I I The following i te ms are public hearings in whi c h ` concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the relate& lroject. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by I stating your name and address`. All such opin ons shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. F. ENVIPONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT_ 91°01 - CITY OF RANCHO - CUCAMONGA - A _request to amend the Development Districts Map from 110P11 (Office Professional) to "FBSP" (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan) for an ± 8.3 acre parcel located at the i northeast- corn -r of Foothill Boulevard and "'Rochester Avenue APR: 227-1511718 and_30.. ~ staff recommends issuahca af.'3 Negativc: Declaration. (Contitlued from Apr,Ll 24, 1991.) R G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANL FOOTHILL BOULEVARD )LAN AMENDMENT 91 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO FFIC - ONGA - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to include the ,± 8.3 acre parcel at the nCrtheast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue within Subarea 4 and '- astablish standards for development - ,AgNI 227-152 -18 and 30, Staff recommends ssuan a of a Negative Declaration. (Continued . from April 24, 1991.) H' FNVIRQNMENT L ASSESSMENT AND Trp » .VISTA C COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -01 - CI`T'Y OF RANCHO Ci7CAkiONGA A request to establish certain streutscape and site ' design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard specific Plan .for that port:ien of Foothill Boulevard within -the Terra Vista Planned Cogiimuaity. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from April 24, 1991.) `r,. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -01_ x- i C=Y OF RANCYO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish certain streetscape aiid site design standa,-,rds- consistent With the Foothill. Boulevard Sl ecific Plan for that portion of Foothill !/Boulevard within the Victoria 'Planned community. Staff recommends - issuance of a Negative Declaratioh. (continued from April 24, 1991 J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC: PLAN E NT SI -04 - CITY Off' RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A ;request to establish certain streetscape - -. and site design standards consistent wa =.ii the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan for that 'portion _of EVccthnlll Boulevard ar thin the industrial Area Specific Plan.. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from April 24, 1991..) K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MODIFICATION TO gONDITIONAL USE PERM -T 86 -06 - RICHARD S,'3NTON - Modification of conditions of approval .to allow land used requirin,4 a more intensive parking ratio than the one provided for research and development (1 space per 350 square feet) within an existing industrial complex on 13.7 acres of land in the General - Industrial District (Subarea 11) ,,of, the industrial` Area Specific. Plan, located on the northwest corner of Buffalo and 6th .Street - APNe 229- 261 -78. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declar�ti;n. (. ontinued from May 8, 1951.) (T© BE CONTINUED TO JUNE 26, 1991.) I, � � F L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE - The request to establish a °mini -mall" (bwap meet) in a leased space of 103,552 square feet within an existing industrial center on 13.77 acres of land in the General Industrial District, - (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area specific Plan, located at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 026 -28. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Daclaration. Related file Conditional Use Permit 86� -06. (Continued from. May 8, .1991.) (TO BE GONTI]AUED To JUNE 26, 1991.) M. < ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSF SME? JL A_WQ ?]EVELOWENT CO V, AMENDt+E_NT '97402 - CTT-x OF'RANCHp CUC:ANONOA -- A request to amend v;:rious development standards and design guidelines far ' mult$, family 1 residential dis-tricts. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from May 8, 1991.) (TO BE CONTINUED TOMMY 10, N, ENVIRONMENTAL - ASSESSMEIyTT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91L02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A L ::+quest to .amend Various development standards and design guidelines for multi- family residential districts within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Deal,aration. (Continued from May 8, 1991.) (TO BE CnNTiNUED TO MY 1C. 1991.4 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMEND 91 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various development standards.and design guidelines for multi- family residential districts within the Terra Vista Planned Community area. Staff recommends issuance Of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from May 80 1991.) (TO BE CONTINUED TO JULY 10, 1991.) P. ENVItTLHHENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91 -02 - CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various development standards and design guidelines for multi- faml;ly residential districts within the Victoria Planned Community area.; Staff recommends issuance Of a Negative Declaration. (Continued -from May 8, 1991.) (TO BE CONTINUED TO JULY 100 1991.) Q. ENVIR!)NMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1x321-- C & G CONSTRUCTION -A subdivision of 2.08 acres of land into 3 parcels in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side; of La Senoa Road, west of Sapphire Street - AP*i: 1063_- 181-07. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. a R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13808 AND-VACATION-OF A PORTION OF EAST AVEIZUE - LEWIS .HOMES - A residential subdivision of 49 single family lots on 34.1 acres of land in the Very. Low Residential District (1 -2, dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific. Plan, ' located at the southwest corner of Summit and East Avenues m APN: 225-181 -04, 06, 07, 08, 42 and 43 and'225 -2.01 28. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative- Declaration. Associated with this project is Tree Removal. Permit 91 -15. S. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW a 89 -15 - DIVERSIFIED - The de-velopment,of Phase III of a neighborhood commercial shopping center ,consisting of two retail buildings totaling 14,800 square feet cn 12.96 acres of land within an approved shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of Haven and Highland Avenues - APN: 201- 271 -65 and 71. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. T. EWIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL L)SE PERMIT 91 -11 -� X i Yx RE CONSTRUCTION - The request to establish a contractor *s office and yard within an existing 12,186 squarA foot industrial building on 1.19 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at 9595 Lucas Ranch Road - APN: 210- 071 -42. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. U. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS - A public hearing to comment on the draft environmental impact report prepared for a residential subdivision and design review of 73 single family homes on 113 acres of land in the Hillside 'Residential Distriiz'- -, (less than 2 dwelling; units per acre), located north of Almond Street, between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APN: 200- 051 -07, 55, 56, and 57. V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PA Rn t I � MAP 13694 - INTECH VENTURES OF CALIFORXrIA -= A subdivision of 10..5 acres of land into 3 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial specific Plan, located on the _south side of Arrow Route between Red Oak Street and White Oak Avenue - APX: 209 - 144 -09 and a portion of ; ,.209-144-06. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. W. ,ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TR,kCT 15060 ,- WILLIA14 LYON COMPANY -'A residential tract subdivision of 10 lots on 124.76 acres of land to create planning areas for future development of Victoria Lakes South `within ' the Victoria Planned Cormunity, scath of ease Line Road and east of the future Day creek Boulevard - APN: 207- 161 -35 and 38, and 227 - 171 -03, 08, 20, 22, and 23. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Associated with this project is Tree Removal Permit 90- 37.' ' X. MI OMENTAL ASSESSMENT A.ND "PARCEL MAP 13962 - ARROYO DE LOS ;OS ja .. LTD. -The subdivision of 17.14 acres bf ..land into 8 parcels in the Specialty commercial District: of Subarea 1 of he t Foothill boulevard Specific Plan to at ed i on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Baker Avenue acid Red Hill Country Club Drive - APN: 207- 191 -1`31, 15, 24, 25, and 41. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declarations. Y. BMZIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERkIT 90^-20__- ARROYO DE LOS OSOS LTD. - The 3evelopment of 17.04 acres for a mixed officelcommercial master plan, consisting of 11 officejtetail buildings totaling 190,950 square feet with Phase 1 development consisting of 6 two- story officelretail buildings totaling ,;113,450 square feet on 3.21 acres of land in the Specialty Commercial District of subarea i of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Baker Avenue and Red Hill Country Club Drive - APM 207- 191 -13, 16, 24, 25, and 41. Staff recommends, issuance of a Negative Declaration. Associated with this project is Tree ReMOVal Permit 91 -19 and Parcel Map 13962.. Z. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON9A - A request to amend Title 17, Chapter 17.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal' Code to eliminate A compact parking spaces. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from April 10, 1991.) (TO BE CONTINUED TO 0W_9 20, 1991.) AA. ENVI RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND YNDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC AMENDMENT 91 -91 - CITY OF RANCHO C - A request to amend Part . III of the Industrial Area Specific Plan' to eliminate compact parking spaces., Staff!, recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from April 10, 1991.) (TO BE CWTINUED TO JUNE (i 20, 1 ' VII. Commission Business - k VIII. Public Comments This is the time and lace for the 'general .general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here ax',. those which do not already appear on this agenda. =x. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment time. If items go bryond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. i vicinity map A 5, CITY OF RANCHO �I UCAMONGA STAI FF REPORT DATE: June 12, 199' TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Fuller, City Planner BY: Tom GrahY., Assistant Planner SUBJECT: �:Itu EXTENSION FOR DESIGN -REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT .13566 ROCIZY ELD - The request for an extension of a previously approved design review of building elevations and detailed site plan of 84 single family lots of a previously approved tract snap consisting of 154 single family lots on 67.85 acres of lance in -the Low Residential Distract (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the south side of 24th Strut east of Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 226- 111 -02. I. BACKGROUND: The Design Review for Tentative, Tract 13566 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on June _'3, 198x;. expire on June 8, 1990. A one -year time extension was grants3`xxtending the map until 4tune 8, 1991; the tract is currently under construction. The applicant is currently requesting a one -year time extension "to expire on June 8, 1992. Provisions of the Development Code, allow. for time extensions in twelve month increments, not to exceed five years £tam thtt original date of approval. II. ANALYSIS': Staff analyzed the proposed time extension and compared the proposal with current development criteria outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Based on this review, staff determined that the tract meets basic development standards for the Zow Residential District. IIT_t RECOMMENDATION: Staff reco=ends that the Planning Commission grant a one (1) y %ar time extension for the Design Review fos Tract 13566 through t'.e adoption of the attached Resolution. Re p itt City Planner f BB:TG :js ,ttacbments: i V)i Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "R" - Location Map Exhibit "C" - Tract Map Exhibit "Dn - Resolution No. 90 -89 Exhibit "E" - Resolution 2;o. 88 -114 Time Extension Resolu ?"' ii of Approval ITEM A � Qe,e)upn�erx March 22, 1991 Ms. Beverly Nissen CITY OF RANCHO CUCAUONGA PLANNING DEPARTMENT'1 ' 10500 Civic - Center Dive Rancho Cucamonga, CA `:1730 Regarding: Time Extension'of'Design Review for Tract 13566 Dear Beverly, € Per your instructions, this correspondence shall serve as our request for a one (1) year extension for the above referenced Design Review. The expiration date for this Design Review is June 8, 1991. Also, enclosed herewith is a check for $62.00 for the required fee. AWL We find it necessary to request this extension due to the longevity of this pLo3ect as well effect the slow economy is creating for our industry. Thank you for your time and attention in this matter. Should you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, ROCKFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Phyllis Kelleher office Manager /pk f cc: File Enclosure tl 11 ntx) olynipir Dave #103 + Corona. CA 91719 • (714) 272-6860 • FAX (714) 272-93si! � AIR ...,� _• n EXI n9 lllive h Ed EXISTING .BASIN No.1 1.- EXISTING BASIN No. 2 ,.. •, �_ � jam• n �.�. u '. `, t I 1 •� �r 11. Fr,f 'INO BASIN No. a ,a - '7'�,, plan Trar xlp— �\BA9w NKo. s x� ITEM: �� ifi(o r1Y OF RAW UCAMONG'A TITLE:lnG�%Ciay1 I�i�cn N PLAN&ir4b !OMSICN A EXHIBIT: l SCALE: f� RESOLUTION NO. 90 -89 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TRACT 13566, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 226 - 111 -02 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above- described project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described design review. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings, A. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval reg4rding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Cooe. B. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga. Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Pro ect Applicant Ex tion Uesign Review Rockfield June 8, 1991 for Tract 13566 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY, 1990. PLANNING COMM SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY:- aFts4c el, Qxirman I, Diad Bullert, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution war- duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the llth day of July, 1990, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES',: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TO'STOY, hlEINBERGER Alk NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE X}}j%ifi hBSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE V 17 ��. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -114 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CNCAMONGA PLANNING COMM J�r10N APPROVING DESIGN "REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13666 LOCATEi1 ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET, EAST OF WAROMAN BULLOCK ROAD IN T "'• LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS Pct ACRE) A. Recitals. (i) Caryn Development has filed an application for the Design the title of this Review, of Tentative Tract No. 1356'6 as described in Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as . "the application ". (ii) On June 8, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a mroting to consider the application:r (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoptAgn of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved - by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, this Resolution are true a,.3 correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on June 8, 1988, including written and this''Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: oral staff reports, That the proposed Firoject is consistent with, the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the propose" design is in accord wi th the objective of the Development bode and Etiwanda Specific plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed design is in compliance witft each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan; and 4. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable, thereto. will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or ,public welfare, or matEri4 .y injurious to properties or improvements in ;he vicinity. ANk �, 11 ALP PLANNING 'OMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13566 - Caryn Development June 8, 1988 Page 2 3. Based taon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1 and _ above, this Comm',ssion hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) Verification of the high water level (HWL) of the wan Sevaine Spreading Basins adjacent to the east property boundary is required N7ior to rarnrdation of the final map. In the event there „is a major deviation from the previously calculated high, water level, the site shall be redesigned to the satisraction of the City Plamttr and City Engineer. 2) That any off -site easements ^ equired from County 'Mood Control shall be obtained prior to recordation of the final map. 3) The off -site slope easement adjacent to the western property line shall be planted for erosion control and that a temporary irrigation system shall be maintained for a period 0 at "least 6 months by the developer, consistent with tie standard requirement for slope planting f( %- custom lot subdivisions. A l'andstape and Irrigatiol `'n shall be reviewed and approved by the City P1ark, .liar to issuance of any permits. 4) That 22 of •s ;, listing olive trees are to be preserved and transplanted to the western slope of the flood control levy adjacent to the Cowunity Trail. The remaining 30 trees`ahall be removed and replaced with 15 gallon size replacement trees on a one -to -one basis to be planted on the west side of the flood control levy. A landscape and -Irrigation plan illustrating tree relocation and replacement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Enginee:* prior to - acordation of the final map. All planting on the levee is subject to approval by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 5) The applicant shall submit a tree removal permit to address the propmscd removal of any part of the off -site windrow adjacent to the western property line prior to recordation of the final map, 6) The design of the tract's entry monumentation shall be subject to review and approval by the omsigi, liWtw Committee and,City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13566 - Caryn Development June 8, 1988 Page 3 AQ 7) That a permanent decorative wall treatmer,, shall be utilized along the western property line unless a map has been approved on the adjacent property at the time this project is to be constructed, in which case a wood fence may br .utilized, subject to the City Planner's approv` The wood fencing shall then receive a consi .ot' paint or stain treatment. • Regardless of whether a project has been approved on the adjacent property, the west boundary of Lot 1 shall receive a decorative block treatment. 8) A natural store shall be uti ized for any fieldstone veneer. However, other types of stone manufactured veneers may be considered subject to further design review, prior to issuance of building permits. 9) That perimeter walls (including walls along street "I "). return walls between units, and corner sideyard walls shall be required are shall be designed with a decorative treatment. -Final design of the wall treatment along Summit Avenue shall be subject; to review by the Design Review :ommittee prior to issuance of building permits. 10) That 3600 architectural detailing shall be provided on all side and rear elevations with an enhanced treatment provided for those units which side -on to Summit Avenue or the Community Trail. 11) Driveways shall not exceed a width of 16' through the public right -of -way. 12) Final design of the equestrian trails (fencing, landscaping, grading) and an equestrian trails plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation of the fina) map. The trail widtir shall be a minimusa of 121 free znd clear and slopes adjacent to the trail shall not exceed a 3 -to -1 ratio. 13) Additional landscaping, including ground cover, shrubs and additional trees shall bL added to the west slope of j the flood control levy. Details shall be provided on final landscape std irrigation plans and shall be subject to review by the City Planner and City Engineer prior to recordation of the final map. All planting on the levee is subject to approval by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, 1 14) Lots 90 and 91 shall be meet the minimum width requirement of 80' as ri asured at the required frost setback. t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIOiY NO. TT 13566 Caryn Development June 8, 1988 Page 4 15) Fifty percent of all of the homes shall have side -in garages. Eight additional units shall be have: side -on garages for a total of 42. 16) the unit on lot ,f46 shall be reversed in order to prevent car lights from shining into the living room areas. 17) Community equestrian trails shall be constructed and improved at the time of street construction. 18) Final design of the grading and drainage for the western property line shall. be resolved prior to recordation of the Final Map., 19) All conditions the previous tentative tract map approval shall apply. ?O) F-ont surd landscaping shall be required on all lots. The design of the landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the t issuance of building permits. En;lineerin5 Division 1) All off -site easements and agreements for the maintenance of the Cotanunity Trail s6 ;ill be obtained from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District prior to final I: map approval,. 2) Final design of the g portals located within the public right -of -way shall be subject to approval of the Design Review Committee and the City Engineer. 3) Driveway locutions shall be revised as follows: a. Lot 12 shall access as close to the west property line as possible. b. Lot 57 shall access from street "B". 4) A 12' side storm drain easement to the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be provided on lot 27. 5) Community Equestrian Trail Improvement Plans shall be subject to the approval of the City FFilgineer. 6) 24th Street and the Lower Loop Street shall be constructed in conformance with the latest City adopted cross section in effect at the time of the Final Pimp recordation. PLANNING C014MISSIOO RESOLUTION NO. TT 13566, Ca ^yp Development June 8, 1;i8B Page 5 4. The Deputy Secretary to. this Commission shall ,certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNING C ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: i ar e a rma ATTEST a u er, y ecru ary I, Brad Buller, ep ty Secretary of the Plarning Commission of the do hereby certify that-the foregoing Resolution was city of duly and Rancho; ucamonga, •eularly introduced, passed, • and adopted by the Planning Gbmi-ssion of the f! the Planning Commission held City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of S3th day of June, 1988, !?Y the following Nate- to -wit: on the AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, TOLSTOY, I f �5�. a I O Z V a 6.�Y�C.N YOwy. t2 i 6q�L p^ •a.B} Y � •_@ Lp�q�Y e y ■� i. p'jd mY Y6 L.`N6 TL iffl -S VrG~ �.tLCOa. 9P.•yMM O 9.T O C �►w > Y C Y C.- Q V O N 0C C1a:Yw� CTU�t'° pYn�.� .x.. V Yy : N.i. q� °L'o. IF s�Y mai Y V�d_ Y. M2.! -. . O CQr / dY. OQ (yy y 'y Y■ > G N COT V 1. K. f. L 9 G A Y C° a J 4 C Yu~ YO QYO YY Y g5 .200. O O e.. �. ^N �: � bc•ai. iL1.0 ML� �.°�yu yY YCL N9 �Y�a ~i��p p�•os Lori;`.. c �S.g.. goN g N y 4w ��Y'�da °CCYO CsCC N aa8 gw3.Kg is 41 9iljNY`L4�DM.iuY �Y yNrt YM YENT Nwg A �`e.eYea.2 rdo aMISS �.qg« g a` Kit is Sb'wyy��..MUeT�$ ,a..�aa'g w >r6 •o_ay:vw °ca =. VL /+O aMY N wYVMw wb� q > >t��TS �CoS:v� +��.CH.C� m. ��O {`i. .N. u u No Y woy Y y�.TTaV'N°: y i q AC M .° G o _w �Nc V 8 ua'r.5 N Vm "UE aw gg c Qcl:� 01 N ,y 0 SS ii $i L b T�°m=1 c K =aR1��m baE .uyyrr y a xb �L �I W .O 0 17 O I c . pp a -�.oa 4. Onn�Y.�pbN J pV Y. ®® YYy tb 6T pY r a I � OCYrb �g M6y ImA}�l QYM a wt " nip xSt� .a o 6. M `Rv. Y�Vq O �y a -2� - s�Ybllopapa a db ma 3, V lroe�� wY a Z rl a * - ai�I I i I11 �.YL4 GV T. OIY -A L.�.4 A'O c>°al CO..N`o ++{ {c{{�� u.. -anu O �a aoui a�uo y`p�LrQ CN.�� OYS OooL dG L C►MOL OaM Qt „+ ��' L N Qi p Nyy NN' N Yom+ i.y u> N 44 � Y •O. M LLY�6N >M .Owe CK ] ~N «Y pp49O.y.Or {M�..oN Lys Ya4 C LM>O6i� q T �N �Pg.Y 'o. app em it E.�:.°- I ^°as °rd •� j YY 4G 4�J�L L� � VwrC.. N ^a1 �$ ►$ 9, ^�. $ +te�gry c"=' «'��t.,. �'... ��5. i aiGU d fY o � u S ,F+3 Id yyYg Op }b 15 L�.� G �'4`g� N«H a d .r -HI 9§1 L. Ypppppppp.0 C�oO �,G�On.T�l ;O O 0 M w.. iy ^ R V M M. Y L M �' y! C JJ 9: if 9 i1 O 4 \N ®= apTJ�af Ss^ ^c Cq A. v ,NOq°„ gg y q O 4L CM6�® ir~ uSls�g+~ Nw1Ytp0 YL �P�Z! $S$ i��._�s 6°eg'S PV UZI v±�e V fie`y=d fr a� 1^3 Ii io + i {: Ail o`e �`M�'i a3 r0� a$ a N o�p s V•M 0 � r IMG. 5.3 3 ws 3Z jig 01 � + C �Cd�O ea �s ,4. 4I y+ g.,3a �lig NO i d! pzpzn ° } d e�e'ri'a �V P6V � «a Ova 1w '6 � _+ O�S 9,3yO1y�e y1 1 4 ^NC NOVi iV . -851 � K�O I; «5 g owi Um N134 r e ps�a�yy zffluz. la m + r +ctr r sr O. V I ccswpr 4G3 oS°'�'o IOow RYB YL ADO fl DYO 4i 0.0 O� El GO co a gu oa o$o oq�. ug9..o+ qtr p ° °L' 5^ y} Y,... �. Nu YN dY Cam. 010. J4 m-M2 L.1 .1 .C�yC y YOUY CC yyC 9c py o c1i rp i OV .O tC Yvice pr.p. ,L �.Ch a oo1•rS p O ^sY o a ot^ y�. u �p �yo o'"`�i n po 's y d Y M p •^ a R N Y 0 9 p 6 u V Y Y D 0 YL'y�1.N!�.N ^O NY H =R ■Lp C ✓ter WA 'OC GdpNt M ».�� ACV Y ^v R CYN' �� ^. _� q�N iY OOUNV �w.flA uO �R Nom.' • n. L' Y NcC. uY01 24 C1rM G O �4Y 4 O �DNC N +V�D CL Y�In O QOM Y Y tl.$L� NY ^ yea- RyY�M A ^CC aL V Y � LN q�m1u FCy yyyyyyyV CC R e� oC ms {.r pVNV R. tl a C a p N.. P N Y w• g M w X L� {N� C�. q ;¢Op 'y'^'Y p % O�O 63CR a— w^+ RGy O�d...1 �. CNs OG�C� C�YORMMCy `YNLLL� C� ..3 - d. C.5 r o NL^ uq CNLCC� r6Rpy ��y =A MN Ny�}�uN NV �� GN. X�3, ®`a 06f °GN ��9 a1'C. NE CQY OI eL �y' °~ wL`oiCci�.^u+u �qL �.. aR8 �aa`L`' vyy$w o ^M a� _,c1�o5.y5 �raeT Lr'{Yy'N"fiif'4cd.{�i ra$� Ryay, oL. Y l L YY'.Y C4CNMYL ^MCw Q r.o u a ^yy �GV1O zW R N N {Y� ^ CO.cH t O O A 016O . •QQL N CVyY� Vi NOCCP� yC.V11ONayy.YY Y� �.�YCQ VCpJ, 7pp. HE CNy��'I ��.°O *"gum <u � L^mt C� N D^ C a S 5 g X 8 �r/! � °s? -s mar ^¢¢� �a -° _ N WS QQ.N ZYas rig a d +++D >so680 let: CSO Ye N to �.K� ^yy B4�C .s <= = {pL R .sue Yu wCpCL� p4 T�1 C9 T VHM�$y` C `yyA^ pO eyycN�� a,Cy Gp YY .c V` 6 ®G,1 9O rn2 dN~ V'S NSA �O T.� C 2. ¢~ Y Em pYw. 4 ^w .Y PLC «�p d V 0 00 M.O ^al zvi2 OL 6 � V j3{�v w e^ �C^ tea„ % eS d �t or 3 uzvcl -. -. Y pT yYYair.Ye 3 VN� ;CY Y pTm cNUC.iO ^Ib. `Yi b �R/ C d Y. OA..L vbp13 a RLw C�sO 6r OY�+» q AL Ia �yR �C�T. 'S°. C�.bcc 8= ^Op ! 4 r, Y.'a. {O� Q L N 4. .d °1ocyr.. or:' +a c�:a^e. aW pYRV ( @ice •`V T t =O V' G L O1L � N C�V Y ^ Y L u.� °NC+ tl.d NO. •LG y C.0 VyC w~ CdV Y Li �p e. ,.C,,.� Cwetul. `yN ® `S,'1C R LOV %{v` V .IJR �y Qy`uo y0 y�yCp C9 Y O.y.s E Sq�. s O.C^ «9W &Z. °i V�LL�yrL��6Ll ytiy M.Nb "pG tJN4 6w lr of T <d ».. tY.°N KU <B F�1�'Om - C.Lif4 N C � N W dq« qNa J.1rw. L' �O. U Y Yy • d qq L {Y{1� qYy� •C �. ®y _ � tl O v L ^N eo °Low. r{L�e ■a Zia g go. uw Cg �X; =f cawsp aEz =q.L' ^aCr mYi�74° r '4 uq C� °.. =LgIG era y ■Yy �M C p � wi YL N® N�_,CNCOL 6 Ci^aYHV - .p{p�� YY F O°6 ypCW. NCCGY.K Lw'' CS �oo gq�o i °YY -H ! G C 0 . c Yg v T O�bC_> W C a a w � & ^ a w �uY ^ .nYec ��wadi T W.;MNW 1up1 Na V c$. Z c�urna° o61ta �°1 C1 9C�q� LP G o'vsa w ava o0 —., g YE.tt US .9 oc wdVO VV a OI'. 0 tu„3 MCVsY.w d �� VNw^i�ry C 'fY J� a w �C � y 6 R ~ Y�� `• ..Y «M w Y W iSS C �M iG- )� g +°° >1gipp 2 a. MsI �•�MOp 4 ~ m M g t &` Wi SYE Y c vt . ,I,,z sue" c 6pYa1� Y�V a O YY VA Tip i � 6 �Yys� @a VM pi_ N l° ~ `0 L w= M�1. Ll a�� =� Y Y I Wa� MY w0�.ts Y'- N V N ^L COICY r.� N = 32 =J: JLi.5 O k Ilk My°.ML ° r g ps ed R Y0 C M L y an0 �r C4 M � L 0w ° Ay Y 3iP�. U t a � y K C w 0 sl � Oi�a. CC � No ;t 1. g s H �sO� Q.m� OYN�.N• NI �) w2 s.g �a u Oc V w 0 Y Y Y _ GLCC .°r t°i.VN '�a a •YAM Ntl � ^� geW u o^ M N w Y ^ Y r d YQ va+u L +" BSc eNYSti. ° NY.L yyQY{a L� yQ• �W.1i O ^..Y♦i � yy V .9n.: p C Y L t 0 N!e1 =a y Ep N M. C.O la� Ye<Y q�C A as = ut. q c C. ^,O« LC Qi.. 6 a '^ V N N •"O sp W H 01' Y lL p V. N .0 � ti S. �20� N« YN C C' ■ O {Y�� y ■y ■y ■C y �1 Cu Q w � C y� W fi V yyy Z x - y. 3 L- Y r 7. .•�_SSS� ^• a¢�.H V.\ OCYgI.O �e1 �� pq. .�C �•n i/�pq� � � ^L 4�+y GO y4�5yR . V Y**1M Yl . mit pLC p'C" SF rte° g; ° `uri' o w _r -QL vz. ~pYe f. Yi� KCOC. C_C �. bM�` �� yL 6L.V6 �C �.� � • Y�.V ^g° �� J�D. e1T w1i YY G1C +, p Y q ® cL � �y�MeM� q$tls ^ � 4-4 "a- 2 EE Y MM ^lO1 4�.repC>>�� aA.`�P O�L�p{ MpLY �Oj°.pPO ^ �_. ^� ass �w_ W.°C . I O�! I rStO aCi0.O .Q■ . . a ONtN t^9• ■C .YY .L�4 YC" �4 LC V `LY� S '� ` C ® ^ N Y q o�^ 0 yy �� Y A�[[G�� O �+TL 9Y0 5O qN�V IC $ p OtT'. .G Y: V N ♦ .P r L6 Yth 19 Got .OY dY 3 ' WVV �4 0="Z ..-C- �.a Caq.C7 `6!Y i m C w M N L Y L< Y O Y Y Y Y • ��. O 4« y 7 p..OwN Is Nom.` yN. V VYy��C •gyp �O M y` Y. O�Cd M.E O. VIVt y 4H. O�<CMCC +_ N • w Oa, � 1 �N� '� �. Y'T yG OO.SC O Q ZEE, ' v = C O 6 M ; y 9 _L Y. V 1� O .•�. y C uu Y �•+� N �yy� - �Y �L� E y �� N a Pa yFi ppy lYa!`L. E0g. ci ax NC , ,V yyp o.S. c% if sy LaLLYR w` I E Igo Q n cq. cj! Q P aW 0' 4Y6 6 G` «•O u`•i f 4it ^'.& P y.. $ bl. 4M u`+$�F�e�'d� ;gip t5 �' '� sn Fi b re �NM ,..wR g� Cuy oA �'wj` i �C 4. O�, ~ �i�lY 1� 2 4 .N•A a u'yir.«� �@ .9 A; v: d �� tip a.°- EM XX $4 C; tz v f ` y 1 f en rii i Gill, 'fAH M 3 SINN Vo M Y � G B O to Mpp y1 tlp �.ae•N• ^� ice. yy� X1111 °c+m Z O Y `° ap rdia'. vV p du t.. V �.. �� SY y aqp to �� Ly C9y Bill�� ~ $ r t� as x� mgS� d IS O. fi N GW Ow• <. O.W Z. �$ Fyw $:M` p �l1 `O CA Y� y • Ems y�. a� aG. g Y 6 N N MINI iy ■ �O x� � { ■CAM Y ■aC `y N _V pi \t_Q •Q � C Ya y4. It J Gill, 'fAH M ♦ p SINN O Y •p LLa� Via o S � �.ae•N• ^� ice. LMC X1111 °c+m Z I `° ap lsik Yw s f. 1311111 jjx` Bill�� ~ $ r t� VA 13ZECO�. IS O. fi N GW Ow• <. O.W Z. a� !! •1 � f �l1 `O MINI fTf u NG� I I I pWp � Y i+ W 21 r3 D 'fAH M ♦ p Y O Y •p LLa� Via o S � �.ae•N• ^� ice. LMC In�.� °c+m Z I `° ap lsik Yw s f. 6 jjx` U i � ~ $ r t� VA 13ZECO�. IS O. fi N GW Ow• <. O.W Z. a� !! •1 � f �l1 `O NG� I I I pWp � Y i+ W 21 r3 D �J w ut lu u Ln Oy q� TT -lit V O . J.aaOSs 66 �y0 C L a� e L Ifc� 1 S. C� r0 ¢V Y Y C L 0o Env` nor Nl r°s^ L.�L Mpc 0 W�F W ^N y4M O L _ � CL9� ti N L O O Y Mop tl ^R i p0 b I ]LOM ri I I W 01^C �►�i3y TT p i 9FN p SSO4 C as y �c L YYYYyu "' »OOO� p'�.., ..—s I G & »6 22-- V Y Y3- 2 N L �'M q� 0 �g� M� M .N¢SC E¢ D M #� Y j La a Y Yw aywe ■� Y is- p z �g� Q` 75 a. ® N_+YY afiC= w ygC Y�»L . o V Y r t j M n Oy GQ$Y N L 4» 3Yw YO y N 1¢ L3L. IMP y oil Ga N.. Y ^ » T O a� 8 YY ` My n YY 5^ 15 itl- <N FNy i^ 6W �w 47 GNAM ytlY Ha ^ 6` C YYC Ui » tl O..i LIL 20 p1r d f 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13566, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PLAN OF 84 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 154 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 67.85 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET EAST OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 226 - 111 -02. A. Recitals (i) Rockfield Develnent has filed an application for the extension of Tentative exact No. 135; 6 as described in the title of this Resolutao; . Hereinafter in this Resolutio.-,t)se subject Time Extensionn request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On June 8, 1988, this Commission adopted its resolution Na. 88 -114, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, the Design Review for Tract No!' 13566. (iii) On July 11, 1990, this Cou nission adopted its Resolution No. 90 -89, thereby approving, a Time Extension for Design Review for Tract 13566. (iv) On March 22, 1991, the applicant filed a request for a 12- month Time :extension. (v) All legal prerequiaLtes prior to the adoption of this Resoluticn have occurred- B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved' by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts not forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereL� ate fically finds as follows: (a) The previously approved Tentative r-Map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and Policies= and 9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13566 - ROCKEIELD June 12, 1991 Page 2 (b) The extension of the Tom. -_eye nap will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Cedes, and Policies; and (c} The extension of tho Tentative Map is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and (d) The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the findings and conclus)3a• not forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby:grcats a Tin:« Extension fora Tract AARUSA=t Exuiration Design Review for Rockfield Development. June B, 1992 Tract 13566 4. The Secretary to thiot, 4ommission shall Certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DRY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. MCNiel, Chairman ATTEST• Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad. Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the _oregoing Revolution was duly and regularly ,tntroducedl passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 3,2th dry of June 1991, by the following vote -to -W ta. AYES$ COMMISSIONERS, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: R% D �P. b CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1VONGA STAFF IRIPORrf, rATE: June 12, 1991 TO: Chairman and Memki4r's of the Planning Commission F&IM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14192 HIX DEVELOPMENT The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for a previously approved tract. map consisting of 65 single family lots on 1.9.7 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located south of 19th Street between Hellman and Amethyst Asanues - APN: 202- 061 -12, 14, 40, and 44. I. ACTION :BQUESTED: Approval of the detailed site plan and building elevations for 64 single fafai`_y lots, and a garage on the site of the Lord House. 11. ANALYSIS: A. Background: Tentative Tract IZ192 was approved by the Planning Commission on June 27, 1390. The application provided, for a 65 lot subdivision with lots. ranging in size from '7,280 square feet to 39,065 square feet 'uz#h an average lot size of 9,208 square feet. The tract px, .vlded, for the connection of three streets that currently dead end into the project site. These streets ace Mignonette Street, Layton Street and 'Kirkwood Avenue. B. General: The application proposes the development of 64 single family residences railing in size from 1,762 square feet to 2,343 square feet. I tot_1 of four floor plans have been provided. Plans 3 and IV provide two elevations reach, and Plans iI and III provide three elevations each._ C. Desiaa Review Committee: On April 4, 1991, he Committee (Keleher, Vallette Kroutil) reviewed- the Droject and recommended approval with, the following modifications: 1. Provide (''eater variation in the front setback utilizing extremes of the requirement. The front'' setback, should average 37- .feet plus or minus 5 fee, ITBM B 1, . PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPf;RT '1T 14192 - HIX LEVELOPMENT June 12, 1991 Page 2 2. Gradually taper all 3 -car driveway widths, greater than 20 feet in length down to a maximum width of 16 feet at the front property line. 3. Revise plotting of units to open up the streetscape. This includes plotting units so that garages and driveways are located adjacent to one another on adjacent lots., 4. Variations should be 1wovided on the rear of some two -story elevations through the addition of "hipped" or "dutched" roofs. S. To break np large, expanses of stucco, provide additional windows cc other architectural features to the side elevations of Plan III and IV. 6. Column box -outs on front elevations should be continued to side elevations. 7. On Flsn II, Elevation B, the column 1)ox -outs above the garage should be revised to reflect the other box -out and corbels on the same elevation. Ask S. Provide variation in the chimney .nap design. The Committee reviewed design modifications to the Lord House garage end recommend3d approval. The attached 3xhibits have been revised to reflect most of the Committee's design recommendations. Comment Number '8 was not addressed and was ±herefore included as a condition of aaprovnl. D. Historic Preservation. Commission: Associateil with development of the project site is Landmark Alternation Permit 2o. 90 -02 vW,ch involves improvements to the site of the Lord House. Exhibits "E ", and "F ", show improvements tom, the Lord House bite and a new garage structure. These exhibits were reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission on April 4, 1991, III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, cr cause nuisance or significant adversb environmental impactsm la addition, the proposed use,. together with the con4itions of approval, is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code aid City standards. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF'REPOR2 '., ' TT 14192 - HIX DEVELOPMENT ✓ f June 12, 1991- r r Page 3 IV. RECOM`eaENDATION: Staff recommznds that the Planning Commission approve the Design Review for Tentative Tract 141'%2 through, adoption of the attached Resolution. ; espe lly su ed` 1. ;Brad , le r I ity ,. dnner BBtTG:jS Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization' Map 1� ahibit "S" - Detai,;ed Site Plan exhibit "C" -• Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations Exhibit "E" - Lord House site Plan Exhibit: °F" - Lard House Garage Elevatibh. Design Review Resolution of Approval I , 10 f m i W e r 0 0 AMh j I -J t , `, j• •+ q �'+ s i w m ..� 1 � s � � o i� raj ( � � � f m i W e r 0 0 AMh } qp a. s � � W ham+ V f .s� �� . '_ _ a .a i c � 1 ��, s� � v -- �,.- -- _ a� "d , u 4i� is [ ""' f-.. a, . �a't- o e ® � i i -+ � ;�. .�...' � ±..� �. a � f -- ,�.} .� phi ®; � ,J�`- -..� �Q� _ i ll" l t 0 r, � � L �� ' 1 El Q L_i3 � �1� •1t ,a�. -ss i EP"15 FT 1p� ;' ` m t . 1E1fJ.i M61A1f1 v r t3 Y1. •' el t i �' ►fib { %w � Mobr z ell, at j - _.NSii €° qc- E ®o Y ( t i t-. w v I �— Q ,-, .. ,, rr, . L 1 . ITY OF t `� � `� I'TE1vS:'� ►My� —� 40j �j '� �UCAMONGA WILE: lgeE ftwcz N PLANNING , ]? SION GXHfBIT: � SCALE: AM CITY OF N y UCAMOP;GA 'rrrLE: PLAN. I,.,, , E#IV SION E`CYMYr: SCALE: RESOLUTION NO. J`) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ' -F THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA&IFORNIA, APPROVING :.ESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 14192, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PI,AN FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 65 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 19.7 ACRES OF LAD LOCATED SOUTH OF 19TH STREET BETWEEN HELLM.ZAN AND AMETHYST AVENUES, IN THE LOG; RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS° PFR ACRE) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: :12- 061 -12, 14, 40 and 44. A. recitals. (1) Mix Development has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 14192 .as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the ;application." (ii) - on June 12 1991., the Planning Commission o�`'the City of Rancho Cucamonga helc a meeting to 'consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolut o . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to follows: 1. This. Commission hereby apeci :!ically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on June 12, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of tAa General Plan; and (b) That the'prop ,4sed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposo■ of the district in which the site is located; and t (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design; together with the conditions aopl.:cable.- .thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or weiare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COM14ISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14192 - -MIX DEVELOPMENT June 12, 1991 r Page 2 �'f 3. Based upon the finding and conclusii.:a set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby' approves the applicLtlon subject to- ea ^'_'t and every condition set forth below and' in the attached Standard,-, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referbtics. Plannino Division: 1 _10 :.• 1) All conditions of apprd,val, as :.contained Planning Commission Resolution No. 90 -B5, shall apply. It, ` 2) variation shall be provided in the design of the chimney caps. " 3) Perimeter walls shall be cc;nstructed of a _. decorative masonry block ibd cap. The wall design shall be included on the Landscape and Irrigation Plan and be subject to City Planner review and approval pr or to issuance of building permits. 4) The Hellman and Amethyst Avenue walls shall be designed compatible with existing walls along the respective streets (i.e., either slump or split face block) and shall include pilasters and a decorative cap. The design of the walls shall be shown on the Landscape and Irrigation Plan and shall --'be subject to Citg Planner review and at. ecoval prior to isauancet of building permits. 5) Corner side yerd and return walls shall be provided with a stucco finish to match the building finish. The wall design shall include pilasters and a decorative cap. These walls shall be shown on the Landscape and Irrigation Plan and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval paI.or to issuanco f of building permits. 6) Full material samples for all walls shall be submitted for City Plans^ review and approvals prior to issuance of building permits. 3) A Landscape and Irrigation Plan identifying „ the location of all slope planting, preserved -in -place trees, relocated tress,; street tress, and replacement trees shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of bcilding permits. PLANNING cOMMISgION RESOTMTION NO. J' TT 14192- MIX DEVELOPMENT June 12, 1991 Page 3 A' 8) Any alterations, additions, nod,�tfications, etc:, to the site of the Lord House shall be done within the bounds, provisions, and £ L dma-k Alteration Permit G 11 requirements o an 90 -o-Z Proposed improvements to the Lord h-)use),Jite shall be revised (refer to the :Taff Report Exhibit "E ") as follows- a) Modify proposed grading on adjacent lots to minimize grading impacts. b) Relocate the approach to °lremove the conflict with 'tha ,,existing palm tree. C) Relocate the wall proposed adjacent to Hellman avenue in compliance with the required wall setback. The wall shall be set back 18 feet average, and 15 feet minimum from the face of curb. ^, d) Relocate the wall proposed adjacent to "A" Street to remove any conflict with trees to be presRrved. Revise grading propcer+a = adjacent to "A straet right -of -way to remove any conflict with trees to bs preserved.. f All walls- shall ba constructed as approved by Landmark Alteration Permit 90 -02. Submit material samples for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Enainser ng Djv_Lqion: l) Lineh of eight for the .intersection of "A" Street with Hellman Avenue shall be plotted on all landscaping, grading, and site planning details regarding the Lord House. The wall or, fence alone "the HolIman Avenue frontage shall be placed, outside .,a one of sight and all landscapinf� within ,hp line of sight shall be approved by the Engineering Division. 2) The otiveways on Lots 21, 47, aad 54 shall be located as far from the adjacent intersections as possible to avoid conflicts with right turning vehicles, Where a 2-car driveway tapers to a 2 -car width, the taper shall be away from the intersaction. 1. .., PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ' TT 14192- MIX DEVELOPMENT June 12, 1991 Page 4 4, The Secretary td,' this Commission shall certify the A adoption of this Resolution.- APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1228 DAY OF JUNE -1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E'. BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman r ATTEST- Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify thac the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning COma£asion cf the,,. City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commie'" r,n held I on the 12th day of June 1991 by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Awb NOES: COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sri sd1 ITV OF DEPARTMENT OF MANGNO OUCADflCHOA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: 0 a` Those items checked are Conditions of Approval APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISiOrd , (714) Dom- `1881, FOR COV�-rUANCE WITH THE FOLf_OWING CONDITIONS: 6,. Time Llmts 1. Approval shalt expire, unless extended by the Plan"" Commission, N b'-"ng pernW, are �J-- not Issued orapproveduse has notoormtemedwiu -t2e ntonthsiromthadateotapaprov "Rt. _ 2. Development/Design Reviews shalt be approved prior 10 1 - ' —f —� 3. Approval of TentativeTraot No. _ is granted subject to the approval of d. Thedevelopershaecommenca,paatk* tein, ands :onsumr&tcfcausatObeoammenced, participated in, or consummated. a Melb-Roos CoMrMnky Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dis Id to Hnatrca QCIffitft jon aatdlor maintenance of a fire station to se ve the development. The r W.W SW be located, designed, and built to aN specNicat" of the RanCfto Cucamonga Fim Protection MOW. and shall become the Distride property upon conVktion. The equipment strap be selected by the Divtr in accordance with Nrt needs. in any building v: -,x f Catkin. the devebper shat comply with all rQplicable laws and regulabom The OFO shall 5e fomted by the Distict and the devek! +par by the time raw-d- . !"* final map Oocure. 5. Prior to recordation of tfto final map or the issuance of building permNa, whichever comes J —J first, the applicant shat conedrot to, or paMC08W 0, ON estabNalunent of a Mtpo•Roos Community Facilities District for the coWnutiort ardmaltttenanca Of necasaary school facilities. however, if any school dtatriv has prevbu* estabWOW Repot a Community Facilities District, the applicant sW, in the a **fiche, cent 10 the annesatfon cf tt% project Site into the territory of such existing'DisM priorto the recordation of the final map AWN or rite issuance of building permits, whit h w comes first. Fudtw,.N the attested school district has not fonrW a Mello -!Roos Community Facilities District Within twelve month3 from the date of, pproval at the project and peor to the recordation of the final reap or issuance of building psernAs for said project, this condition shah be deemed null and void. LJ1�1 / sc - 2/81 1 of 12 .-tv 14M_ QM; '2m D This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and a!I affected school districts have entered into an agreeinent to privately accommodate any and all school Impacts as a result of this project. I is _1__*1 6. Prior to recordation of the final inap or prior to issuance of building permits when nh map is JJ involved, written certification from the aifectcd water district that P.dequateaewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of CamA ,nity Development. Such teller must have been issued by the water districtwithin90dayspriortofinal map approvalinthe caseof subdivision orpriorto Issuance of perrMs in the ease of all other residential pro]KM. B. Site Development t, The site shall be developed and maintained in accordant -e with the approved plans which J—l- include site plans, architectural elevations,. exterior materiels and colors, landscaping, sin program, and grading on file in the Piannir;p DM-;on, the conditions contained herein, WWI Development Code regulations, and•* 2. prier to -,may use of the project sitki or business activity being commenced thereon, all _J--J- Conditions of Approval shall be conti'Wed to the satisfadicn of the City Planner. 3. O= upancyofthefacilityshr 'notmmntncer.: Qlt such time its all Uniform Building Code arid State Fire Mar hall's regulaa_*ns tue,re been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cracamonga, Tiro ProtecOnn Distrkfi and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. Ths building shall i..1 inspected for compliance prior to �r occupancy- 4. Reused site plans and building elevations ilrcairporatirr9 ail Cr;z' ''ons of Approval shall be JJi� submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to iss=mfr a of building ponnits. S. All site. gradl,,landscFp&, irrigation, and streetimproven Wit plans st,:ibecoordinafedfor consistencypriorto issuance of any petn ts( suchas graft ,teedfamoval,encroachrn:int, building , etc.), or prior to first map approval In the tom:: of a custom'bt subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fleet. 6. Approval of tWis request shall mot waive compliance with ell sections of the Development Code, ,A other apw ;sbte Clty Ordfnares, and appleAWe Corrxmunky Plar, or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. r A detailed on 0 AWkM plan SW be re,46w3d and approved by the Cfly Pl3rurar and J_/ Sherill's Dep&rtmerrt (989.6at t) prior to the issuance of buik" psmyta. Stich plar shall indicate style, illumination, ocakn, height, and Method of shieldfnp so as not to adversely affect adjacent propeMes. 8. H no centratl7ed trash receptacles are proiil&%d, al trash pid -up shall be for h- 06dual units _.f_J_ with all ree tastes shielded from public mew. 9. Trash .'iceptacle(s) are requited and shat iT-�d Cipy standards. Tt+e final design, WA90115, —J--J- and the rou . r+ber of trash receptacles shape be sub wt to My Pith per review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transiorrnars, kH condensers, etC., shall JJ be ktc ated ^? °t of public view and adequately screened through the use of a corrbination of cencrete or mason.y wails, benning, andlor landscaping to the Satisfaction of the City Planner. )6 SC =2191 2or12 C�^dadon 1)am: 11. Street names shall be submitted tar City planner revie'N and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Police prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual urnres shall be identifiev to a ^.Isar and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13. A detailed pian indicating trail widths, maximum stapes, physir?l cOndIlOW fencing, and weed Control, lu accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall b3 suLlnitied for City Planner review and approvalpriorto approval and recordationof the FinaiTract Mar>and prior to approval o° stra I improvemenx and grading plans. DevO'opershall upgrade end constrict all traits, including fencing and drainage devires, in conju� tk+n with street imprOvarrents. 14. The Covenants, Cooditions and Restrictions (CC &Rs)shall not prchbit the keepingofequine J J anV..3lswhere zoning requirements forthe keepingof saidanirnais hzvobeen rnet. individual lot ownors in subdivisuns shall havethe option of keeping said animalswithoutthe neosssity of appealing to boards of directors or ht: •eowners` associations tar ameroslments to the CC&Rs. 16. The Covenants, Condmans. and Restrictions (CC &Rs) and ".1ctes of Incorporation of thi Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the PfannY.-4 arO Engineering Divisions and the City Attorritey. They shall be ":,worded cone d"3ntly wfth the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, wt;dhever o=rs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16. Allparkways, open areas, and fandscapingshail be pen jmatlymafrdairied bytheproperty —Jrl ayner, homeowners' assort 4ion, or other means acceptable to the Cily. Pmof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Cty Manner and City Engir +ter review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. _ 17 Solar ac, - Basement€ shall be deftated for thri pttrpase of assuming that each lot or _J dwelling unit unit shall have the right to receive suniigiit across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy syste;.i. The easements may ba c ordahwd In a Declaration of iiestWIons for the subdivision whirl:, 3 be recorded concurrentiV with the reuorda ion of the filial map or issuaticY of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohIA the casting of shadows by vegetation, stnWwres, fixtufou or any other object bxcept for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Zovelopment Coda Sec don 17.08.06@-d -2. 19. The project contains a designated Historical Landman. The site shall t- develoW and maintained in accordance with the Histoe-. , Landmark Atteratiort Permit No. . Any further modifications to the site indudfrtp, but not ".J to, exterior ateratfons and/or interiorafteraWmwhichaffetdtheexteri crolttiabuiidlopurstattrttures.r movstsoitan*nark trees, dernolklon,rem-ation,re onstrucdtionofbulidingsorstiuctcres ,ordungestottssite, shall mcl ui e a moa° *:on to the Histu.°ic landmark Atieratfon PerrNt. subjeoi to Historic preservation Comntisswott review and approval. C. Bu71dina OWgn 1. An affer+zative energy syg,_Im is required 10 provide dome tic hot wafer tot all dwaft units arA tar healing any swimming pool or spa, unless OW alternative enwrgy syCIenis are demonstrat edto beat aquivalentcapaOy and eflWorq. Arswknrdngpool3' wstaaad aithlr time of iretiaf development shat be gupplemontse, with eafar ttekt(ng. Wads shall to indurRW it the building plans and shJ11 be vjbrr'.f ad for City PianncT review and approval prior to the issuance of buflding-- vrnits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, skle and rear elevations upgraded wxidh irc.1- iectural �--1- treatrner", detailing and increased delimAtion of surface treatment subject to CW Planner review and approval prior to issuance of buildmg permits. c SC -2 /S: 3ortll �; EL4tect tin.! Ceimol +lion Date! 3. Gtandard patio aver plans for use by the Homeowners, Association srall be sut;nitted for City Planner and Bu.ldlrrq O ficial review and approval priorte issu.resc6cf Wilding permits. All roof appurtenance's, includiing air conditioners arc; other roof mounted equ 'vmant and/or _ / — projeCtior ,s, shall ba shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and strewn as repaired by the Planning Dfoision..Such screening shall be architecturally integraiecd wrh the building design and, tons'.ructed to the satisfaction n.f the City Planner. Details shall be inwded in building plak 1. 0. Parking and Vshicular A- sass (indicate details an building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a mInSmurc outsk;s dimension of 6 feet and shat con *ain a 12 -inch walk a jacert to the parking stall (1tx:iuding curb). 2. TaxturM pede.Kn,n paM.Pays and textured pavement across circulation alskts shall be --�- -� provirl::dth, rjghouttteo,;vek, pmentt4 connect dwetli�,-]sfuniisl bul1diitgswftho+pev.spaces/ plazaslrecreattonal uses. 3. All parking spaces shall ba double striped per City star t. and *:Q driveway a;sies, entrances, aril exits s'mg tart &,iped per City standards. ,I. All units hall be rovkfed with garage door openers it driveways are lass than 16 feet in depth from back of sidet+alk 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restr,14brts shall recifth isniorseeoim-mationalvehicfes on this site unlatuta they are this princkul sourca of tmnspot+.atfoa for ft o xner and prohibit parking on inierlor Nrc usetien als!es other hean its desW-Wed :eft W parking areas. 6. Plans for arty security gates sWI be subauded for the C- ' AMI. er, wlty Engineer, and Aa tchoCucamonga Fire ProtectionDistric javiewaaJ ovalprtarta issuance OfbuifdirtPa permit,-. --i_l— .J r E. Landamping (for Publicly frlalntetnk! tangy -aps 89W. rater to 3oetE:�rt N -) a� 1. A detailed f..Est:ape and h7Wion plait, lncktdk'tg W" WAMr+g ZW mo ti`, bbine tandscap- —f —�-- Ing in the case of re sidentlal develop.T&ni. sW be prepared by a face_ -mood- lartdt3cape archillWandsubmiltedfarCity PfamlerreviewandapprovalPkrtatlte ?s a'tceet?t -Jing permits or prior IMJ trap approval In the case cl a (z,stom tat subdivlWm 2. adsift trees requirm.. -, bepreservsdinpt juesWhep(ot( +A.iwthaountmctiont r Ina=ManogwiihthawmApWCo4;aSfttbn S.oe.tut?.arkisoeuKodotrthegWngplans. The location of those trees tote. F!osewsd In plans and new locations *11 , t ansplartted trees ' shelf bg shown on the d®W14d-W WAP- 9 PLUM. The ept> wItSOfORMS1®fV -1R afW$ recatnnrandatlons regamft iv servatiort, trantspianlirq u1d tr+ s+tri methods. �3. Aminimumol,, ,�tttsesPs"- '�rossac�.acmR`�.._ oftthatol ?F;var�eIaea.sttaNbs,�tovk)ed within the project: 9L - E8- imh box es =,rg9rs _�,, , - ,IS. io *vx or larpr, % - 24 -inch box or WW r, % - 15- std - ticn. -4. A ntir -ium of 4e5 ydlanled vritltin Ihs Pn . --en she trees - 24 -inns box c r tatgi'rr. S. Within parkhrig Ws. tress shsdl be panted at I raft at one 95 -ga3b n tb - -every thr" parking strlis, sufticlent to shade 5G" -;of :he pvr,: tnq area tit solar morn on August 21. SC - 2 /9d 46 4 of Ya -/— I -6. Trees shall be planted in areasof public view adjacent to aW along structures at a rate ,.)f one tree per 30 linear feet of buildimi. 7. Ali private slope banks Sleet or lessin verticatheight and of 5:1 orgreater slope, but less than 2:1 siof: e, snap be, at minimum, irrigated and landscapad with appropriate ground cover for eroslon control. Stopo plaffrtp requited by this section ,hall include a.oermanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. B. A[prvate slopes Inexcetu%.. , test, but lessthan8feet Invenicalnagnt and of2:1orgreater slope shall be landsr;aped and irrigated fo( erosion control at;:! to soften +h -:: 2ppearance as follows: one 15 -gallon or largerst -a tree per each., Gsq. ft. of slope area, l-gallon orlE,rger We shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope b, nks±- a" essofs feet invertical height and of2 :1 or greater siope shall also include one 5 -pahon or ierge: size tree per each 250 sq, ft. of slope area. Tree3 and shn<bs shall be planted In staggered clusters to soften and vary s" plane. Slope planting required by this sMk7n shall Include a permanent irrigaWn system to be Installed by the developer prior to oG- Upalcy. �_. 9. For sings family residential dw.elopment, alt slope planting and irrigation shall be corrtinU- ously maintained in a heafthyaFidthdvirgcor4ii: ,n4 ttre developapurriil each individtialunit is sold and ocw3iedby the buyer. Prior to r, feat, occupancy forinose und-n. an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning OW-4on to determine that they are In sawaiactory condition. 1 o. For mufti- famity resdential and non - residential development, property orvners are respon- sible for IN c- -minuat maintenanre'of all landscaped areas On -s* as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right -of -way. All larxisr aped areas shag be kept free from r weeds and debris and ms...tafrtsd in a heeAhy and 1".clvtng condition, any shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing;, mowing, aW trlimir,° V. Any dantaged, :bead, disearied, or decaying plant material shall be replaced V Ain el days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard Iar dxai ng shall be re?v: rid per the Oak ebpmenl Cede a� .,t /or . This rwAilremant shag b+t In 94ditia to the required street trees and sioos pigrftfrtg. _ 12. The nna; design of the perimeter p7,1t ways, walls. Wndscaping, and sidewalks shall bE includad in tt►e required landscape ;Am arO email be ttubj al to CO+ Planner review arx approval and coordinated forcorAi 9m;yrr'>_..- Ipadcwa',1pr. .:apLVplanwhkhtnaytx recrrired by the Engif aering DIvttsiort. J. _J._ Jam/ --/- J _/ —J_— - _/. _/ 1 3. Special la,- Wscape features such eel mouth, sditmW rod, qHK*non at* trees, meander -) —�—� Ing sidewalks,'rrftfi horizontal change), and inlensliled la xWca0v. is mgvlred Mora �. 14 La: rxi scapkglard471gacirHtByatems required tobefnsWiadwMin the i ublic right- of -wayon - ._L.J— ttte pedrtwor of this project area sf>ssN be cordkwously mafrW. yid 1*41 tho deveWOr. 15. All wags attaM be pmvided wkh decor Lk* treatm rit, M. locator In Plic mai0WaMe auras, —1--J— the des a shah be coordirated trrftll the ivrr limiting Otvieion. 16. Tree mshenarm crW riot shag be developed arty sew for '4 Planter mview arxf —J--J- am-oval prior to Itisuance of btlltifftg Penfftr Trlese C- 41lda;'t 01 encourage the natural growth cha meleiistkcs of the selected tree spwUs• 1;. LaMsL-Oing aril W.4 on sflall be designed to conserve water thrOu,2h the prixiPles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 15. is of ft Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cede. /.:'� SC•2 /et ; rr ?2 F. Signs Completion Date: 1. The slgn� indicated on the submitted plans are concepluall only and not apart of thisapproval. Any^ signs proposed for this uevelopment shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate ppiicalion and approval by the Planning Division pr�rto installation ofany sign.. 2. AWer n Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner. review and —J�— app ; I prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument stgn(s) shall he provided for tspartment, condominium, or townhomes prior to occupancy end shall require separate application and approval by tha Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock -J.—J Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. —2. The developer shall provide each prospective t uyer when notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Studies Zone for the Red Hill Haut, Ina standard formal as detennit,adbyft City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. T he aaveloper shall provide each prospective buyer written no!ioe of the Foothill Freeway J —J project In a standard format as deiemllned by the City Planner, prior to sojoptino a cash deposit on arty property. —4. A final acoustical report stn-if be submitted for City PWuw review ard approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The fa,ai report strap d�mss the lev.4 of interior noise attenuation to below 45CNEL,thebuildingmateds(sand crtrstrucHoWl'-hniquesprovided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitiolon measures.. TIA 11 ,$ding plans will be checked for conforr are with it* mitigation measures cor►'alned In V a final report. N. Other Agencte-1 1. Emergency secorWryacoess shall beWAdedInacc3rdancewitriRaWVCum mon2aFire --J—�— Proraciion District Standards. 2. Emargencyaccassshallbeprovide matntenancefrseandclear,u rr1IrrP1mof26featwide i —J J at all times during construction w, accordance vMh Rancho Cuca mega Fire Pretection District regvlrements. 3. Prior to 16� of buff perm to for combus" construction. evidence shall be subinkled to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire PMeeftn OlsIft that temporary water supply for fire protGOIK,, is ava;`labie, pending conVOt -"+n of ratyulred fire protection system. i 4. The applicant shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of of mail boxes. Mupf -family residential developmcsnlst shall provide a solid overhead s..vcture for neap boxes with adegsc;te lighting. The &W losatbn of the map boxes and the design of the overhead atructure shall be subjoct to City Planner review and approval p,,;4r to the Issuance of building permits. --5. For projects +tsing sb%lc dark 'Witfies, written certification of aoceptabilky, including all supportive informat;oh, shall be obtained Win ft San Semardino Courgy Departrncnt of Envimnrnental Health and submitted to the Building Off vial prior to the Issuance of Septic Tangy Permi4s, and prior to issuance of building Perri ts. 634; SC - 2/91 a of 12 APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989- 1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. t'lto Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, crdinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative pet mits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinaft a and applicable handauts. 2. Prior to ..suarmw of building permits for anew residential dwelling units) or major addition to existingunh(s), the aplicanlishall paydavelopmentfees atthe established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limhedto: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fes, Perrrh arxt Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or irmdustrial develdrWent or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fe,9s at the established rate. Such fees may Include, btn are riot limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Builf irg Official, aftertractfparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Stnuctum,4 J, 1. Provide compliance wYh the Uniform Building Code for thr( property line Clearances considering use, area, and fire- reslsliveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall L ;mode to comply wkh ck'jd building and aonkq regulations for the intended use or the L. \Ming shall ba demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/orcvw to comply with the Uniform Plumbing Code and Undwrn Building Code. 4. Underground on -s.'ie utilkie2 are to be located and shown on building plans submined for building parrM application. K. Grading Grading of tho subject property ahatl be in accordance with this Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted Wadktg practices. The fatal eradkV plan sl%il be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. ef� 2. A soils report shd be prepared by a qualified engktesr Ilemnsed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. The develoMnent is located wKhin the soil err>alan control boundaries a Sol Distuftrice Pernik Is required. Please oordact San BemuoiYto County DeparimiOntof Agftkure at (714) 387 -2111 forpermiteppikation. DowmerWon of such permit shall be submined tothe City prior to the issuance of rough gra1fNnD permit. 4. A geological report shaft be t;repar.d by a qualified erger Rr ogand S — d at ands tite time of application for grading Elan check. 5. 1 heik ulf grading plans shall be mmpleted and approved priorto Issuance of buildi. 4 permits. SC, 2/91 701`12 633 t Na 1k (2- Completion Dow _J_J- J_ J _J_ _J_ _I -1— _J__J_ J_, J_ Jed 6. Asa custom -lot subdivision, tho to:!owing requl*mants shall be met: a. Surety shall bepoMSJ and ar agreement executed guaranteeingcompletiunoftJon-site drainage facilities facilities n6nessary fordewatenn2 all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division pnv)rto final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements i it sate disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto JJ or over adj.;icent parcels, are to be delineated and eecorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division odor to issuance of gradirt j and bu ?.ding permits. c. r- • e drainage improvements, , necessary for dewatering and protesting the subdivided --1� .: roes, are to be installed prior ;o issuance of huildk eg permits for construction upon wry parcel that maybe subject to dr.: -v?Qe flaws s leing, leaving, or within a.parcel relative to which a Luiiding permit is reques,',^I. d. Final grading pia_ s for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety �—J- -- Division for approval pricirto issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite wmis.) e. All slope -arks in ercess of feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses —�—% orplanted mith ground cover kr erosion control uponcomplCkinof grading orsome other aftemativE method of9rosioncontrol shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building 'afficial. ii-. addition a permanent mien system shalt be pmAded. Til is mquirement does not releary the appleanYdeveloiwx from compli8;ce with the slope planting raga . ^Tents of Section 17.06.04r 1 of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENOiNEEfRlt3 G ©iVISCON, ( 710) Me- 1€d63, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CO?7DMONS: L. Dedication arrd keWular Access 1. Rights-0f -way "easements shall Nj dedicated to the City for FSN Wdedor pubic streetrt, community trams, pubife paseas, public Wax%cw areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans pfty tentativeo mo. f Wate easeakm tf3 for nGnJX lllac facilities ( cross -iot drairmp, ioaal feedertrails, eta.) shah be reserved as sham on the p1mis and/or tentative rrap. 2. Dedis.'10n shah tkd rr le .df ft fOlfO�rifg rVft- &wsy err the p3rhTiMer streets i —�—� -- (measured front straef centerline): ?' tatalfeeton ilk l+jttD�� IoW feet on Wall feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable Offerof dedication fcr foot wide roadway s 4srela shag be made for all all private streets or drives. I 4. No •veh far sa s detift aced to t,e Cuy for the fopow,inV Streets: J.J 14MA4110,9n 5. Reciprocal access easements 3ha8 be provided erlswft access "4 tell pamis by CCBRs /_' _ or by deed}; and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building prnrlits, whero no nvp is involved. SC -2/91 e0r13 , Am V Dam: 6. Privwe drainage easements torctoss -lot drainage shailbrprovided and shallbedelineated Comrletion or noted on the final map. 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10 -toot minirnum building restriction area on the neighboring Irt adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: TWe hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohrbit ih.E cons,.uction of (residenYat) buildings (or other; structures) within those areas designates on the map as building restriction areas. A maintenance agreement shallelso be gran*.;.d from each Wl to the adjacent lot through the CC &R'3. ,8. All existirgeasements ingwithinfuturerights-of -way shall be quitclaimedo.- delineatedon —/—! -- Vie fin ! map 9. Easnments for public sidewalks andlor street trees placed autside the public right -of -way slr'. , cue dediczle i io the City wherever the? encroach onto private property. 10. Additionatc restright -of -way shall be dedicated along rightturn kmese,tc - -vide a n„ninwm of 7 feet meacumd from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidetiwe3c Is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shag be provided. 11. Usdevelopershadl make agoodfaith+ effarttoacqufp1therequlmdoifs lia property tntereste. ne^.essary to construct the required pblie iapm "merrta, and .4 he1£he should faitto do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvemerAd pursuant to Govermenent fade Section 664.462 at such time as the City 2CCF 2eS1110PMP�,r!yirac: aster equiredforfheimprovertents. Such agreement shall poo-Ade for r.4ymant by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property Interests reWiredincomes3lonwhinihe subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shalt be in the form cf a sash deposit In the amount given In an appraisal report obtained by C'm developer, at developer's cost. The appra!ser shall have been approved ty the City prior to oommartc9metx of the appraisal. M. Street Impravatnartta 1. All public improver ents lirterior VeSta, dreirv3ge faCM83, coinmunky traps, passes, landscaped areas. etc.) shown on the plarrs artfor ter aM ntap s.W to constructed to City Stepdards. Interbr street tr., mvernsnts dO inclucke, W are not limited to, curb and guttar. AC pavement, ddn rproaches, sideimaics, street lights, mW street trees. l 2. A, rrininnum of 26- toot wid,o,- avernent, r}Ahin a 40 .toot We dedicated right- of-way shall lee � _ J�o str constructed for all half- sedlan eets. 3. Constnx2 the wkrw r g parioneter strest Improvonw a including, but not NfftW to: sC - w /91 9 or 12 /1 ::R j" 25 Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on m9ter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (e) If so marked, side - wafk shall be curvilinear pe TD. 304. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of cqn$ traction f e shall be provided forth hem. t s� g4kt6Qi44kA�' d4kV�{�1t1_ !e 4. Improvement plan %and construction a. S.3t improvement plans licl uding street tree's and street tights, prepared by a tegis- tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement ex=Aedto ft sa istaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improve - ments, priorto'imal map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever Occurs, first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name sigr►ing, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to 'he satisfaction of the City Engltrser. d. Signal m-,duiiwRh pull boxes shall be installed onanyrswoon nxUonorreconstruction of major, secondary or collector mnreets which i!oalseetwith other major, secondary or coMddfzr streets for future traft siinals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at3 feet outside of SCF1, ECRoranyotherlocations approvedbythe City a. Q 9. ` 12-- Completion DAe: LLA J_J._— J..._/— IJ_._/ I --f-,^J Notes: ;t) Al pull bores shall ba No.6 unless otherwise specitied by the City Engineer. (3) Condirh sh &V be 3 -fth gatvanized steel with pulfw. Wheel chair ra-gm shat be Installed on sA k%r corners at ktorsections per City Standards or as dirwtd by the City Engrneer. Existing Cty roads requ" CD.- Mn.V80" SW r8=1111 open to tr8 to at as times with adeWMsdet0uradudngconstMftn. Aslit"Ciusureperti-igmaybe ra ksd. Acash deposit shall be provided to cover the ew of pra&V and pavirq, which sha1 be refunded upon Corrml"Don of the (rrrsf9rjdbn to the wMactim of the Chy Ett Waar- ConcenMeddrCinaQefb *sSWnOtCM3.1d2wa". UrKW sklawoU drains shall i+tt ingal9d to Clly StalYiV ft excerpt for eingie family Ists. h. HandkQp mr=ss rempdesign shmttt be as siwdkd by the Clly Erfgltreer. i. Streets, meenmess' r$ ttbasppac+ �dtxylheCNy�xtsrta�rtostalfdifkst�liartChsc�c. S. Street irnprovemerit plans per Cy swicla� for as private alre is attall t m provided for .,oview and ppprgval by the City Engkat. Pf W % any work WN pelt tod on the Pri- vate streets, fees sh>ium bo pald artd ConstrIYA" pam>t3 ahait be QW111110 fr m the Ctl Engine z OHL-* 0 ad6;ion to agrl oft., perrsmft� required. 6. Streit tress, a tiftnclm of t sganon size n, beer, shd be metalled par City Starir arils to acrardance smith the City's street trae program. QZ)4- SG 10 of 12 JJ J,1 —J--J- -J--J- -J--J— J� �LKv 7. Intersection line of site designs sha;I be reviewed by the City Fngineer for conformance witVk Co,pdeoon Da•�,; adopted policy. i J —J__ a. On collWor or larger; streets. Vnes of sight shall be plotted for all project Intersections, -- -r —� -- including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Lar.'�caping and,)their obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street Intemocilons shall have their noticeabitlty lmproved, usually by _...1_J . movingthe2 +h closeststyeattreeson each side awayf iomthestreet.::d placed la ,street tree easemnt. B. A p nn shall Oe o4talned from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-ol -way: J--J— 3. All public imorwrements on the following streets shaft be operationally complete prior to the issuance of of building penr4s: N. Pubiin Maintenance Arses s 1. A separate set of landscape ami iYQat,on plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shalt be submitted to tare City Eraineer for revie+v and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of ouiiding permits, whichever occurs first. Tha tollowing landscape parkways, medians, ^?5eos, ea.smeM, tails, or othor areas are r"juired to ba annexed into the La c Maintenance DiblIM N + ask 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join nndforfc.mtthe appiopriate Landscape and Lighting Distriasshallbe fifedwith the:.ity Engineerprorto final map aWmvalor Issuance ofioti ing ,"rmits whichever occurs rust. Formation costs shall ba bome by the developer. _ 3. All requIredix :btictanducaping and inigatk nsystems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the C73y. 4. Parkway tandocapfrig on the Ralbwing street(s) i„wl co dorm to the results of the respective Beautification Master PI€ O. Drairuege s..►d FtoW Control 1. The project (or porUns thermal) is le acted within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be pn*viiAd as certified by it registered Civil Engineer and approved by tho City Eromr• 2. it shall be it:a developer's rermnsibilG}f to hr•.ve the cunrottt FiRM zone Jasignation rernoved from ttte project area. no developers engineer stallil prepare all necessary reports, plates, aind ttytfnskAjhydrauft caimlattoros. A Car Illonal letter of Map R&YNon (CLOMA) shah be obtained from fEMA prior to final Map approval or ;uance of bulk ft permits, whichaver occurs first. A latter of Map Re. pion (LOMB) shall be issued by FEMA prior to or.oupancy or WMmverrrrit accaptanoe, whichever u=rs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by qw City Engineer prior to final. map approval or the issuance of building perrnits, wtichever actors first. All drainays faclfitres she-',)e installed as required by the City Frsl; r er SC -:2/91 11 of 12 f✓ —J--J- -J--/— —1-1— —J--J- / 1. 4. A peen it from the Count} Flood Control District is rewired for work within fts righi�ol -way. S. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 6. PubM, storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate uttirty, services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, wa ir, gas, elec. . telephon , and cable N (all underCvound) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be Mvided as required. f 2, The developer shall be resoonsibli i for the ,etocation of existing utilities as necessa:;. J 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and; constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD). R3 h-- Cucamonga Fire Protection District. and the Environmental Health Department of the Cou* of San Bemwdino. A te,? *T of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever o=m f!W.. Q. General Requirements and Approvals f�npletio,�-ate: .The separate parcels contained within the projeciboundari .,s shag be legally coffbn(.d Into one parcel prior to Issuance of building permits. _ 2. An easement for a Joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or —i--1— issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for. 3. Prior to approval of ft final map a deposit shat be posted with the City covering the i estimated cosi of apportioning the assessments under A;;aesttnwrt DfsWc _ among the nawty created parcels. 4. EtiwarKWS&n Sevaine Area Regional Maiinline. aecomdary ReglemAl. and Master Plan Drainage Fees shat be paid prior to IM map approvalor prior to building permit Issuance it no map is irivolvee. S. Permits shall be obtained from the folowirg agencies for work within their right-of-way: 6-A signal consent and walve4 form to join and/or forth the Laws Enforcement Corn unity Faciidios DiM &.bald be flied with the C; y Engimer prtos to final map approval {-the issuance of building permits, whichever oc i:urs first. Formawn costs shall be borne by th© Developer 7. Prior to finagmtion of arty dweloprient phase, sufficient,' Imprwemert place shall be oom- pieted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondaiv access and drWriage prOoction to the saes action of 44 City Engineer. flaw boundaries 01211 othiyeWnd to lot Wvs shown on the approved tentative map. rK , 2/21 12 of 12 1° DATE: juxle ia, K7D TO: Chairman and Meiners of the Planning Commission 7 FROX: Bra:, Buller, City Planner BY: Stev= Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRUCT 13-81 COVINGTON HOMES - The design review of building +elevations and detailed bite plan for 114 lots of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map ccnsistin3 of 142 single ,family lots on 33 acres of land in the Low- Medium Residential. District of the Victoria Planned Community (8 -14 dwellii,,g units per acre), located at the northc+est conser of, ;lase Line Ro A and RochestPr. Avenue APN; ,t27- 081 - -06. I. pROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested_ Approval of the de t ailed cite ;plan and building elevations. B. Project Density 7.4 dwelling units pa�'a`• C. Surrounding Larid Jse and Zoning: r ' North - Single Family Residasntiala '' Victoria 'Planned community . South Vacant; 'Terra Vista Planned Community East - Lumber Yard; Victoria Planne&'Community West - Future Park and Future Residential, Victoria Planned Commw: ity D. General Plan Deere` sons: Project. Site yoWdadium RUB dential (4 -8 dwellin_ units per acre) North Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) South - Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dw411ing units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling u.Li.ts per acre) West - Iow- MecUum Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) E. Site Characteristics: The site- has been graded and the iufrastrscture has been installed if! the southern half of the tract, whgre homes are under construction Perimeter walls and landr ,;aping )gave been installed. ITEM C m K PLANNING CONCUSSION STAFF'. REPORT TRACT" 13281 - COVINGTU H('-XS \ June 12, 14, }1 Page 2 � 1: II. - ANALYSIS: A. Back ound: Tentative `Tract 13281 was. approved by the Planning Commission on January 27, 1988. On June 27, 1490,;; Covington Homes received approval for the detailed site plarx and building elevations in order to proceed with the construction of 199 single family homes. Construction has been under way on the homes in the southern portion of the t±aeL, an3 the model complex will be open in the near future, EiPuby -five .lots will be constructed with the previously approved "Country Park" product in the southerly half of the project, as shown an the Site Plan. The remaining 114 lot %a are proposed to be constructed with ;che nrw "Country Park II`,;product before youi',tonight. B. General: in the current proposals the applicant is proposing to employ a new architectural style and house plans on 114 of,ff the 199 lots- The homes have massing similar to the earlier plans, but the square footage is generally smaller. The three new house plans range in size from 1,085 to 11455 nquarq feet* while those under construction range.,from ir385 to 1 *874 square feet. With the current application, Covington Homes has proposed a new color scheme which will serve as a uniflin.g element for the entire tract. Tract 13281 consists of 199 lots which are the innovative wide - shallow design. The typical dimansionst are 50 feet by 60- feet - The minimum lot size is 3,400 square feeti tile -- maxima -" is 7,000 square feetl and the average is 3,800 square feet. Front yard landscaping is beinr provided because the average lot size is less than 4,500 equare feet. Return walls between homes will be stucco to match the design of the homes. Storage areas for recreational vehicles are provided on 56 of the 199 (28 percent) Iota. To accomplish this, expanded side yards are located on 25 lots, while access through the garage to the rear yard is provided for 31 homes. C. Design paview Committee: The Committee (McNiel* Tolstoy, colemanjf recommended approval of th9 project on May 2, 1991• subje -t to the following conditions:: is Upgraded window treatment, in the form of window panes to :patch the treatment used on the front elevations, shall be provided on, the eposed second- story'elevat tons of those units which are visible from Rochester Avenue and Mllena moist, and all corner side elevations= l PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT K: MCT 13281 - COVINGTON HOMES' une 12, 1991 = 7 -Page 3 2. The unit on •fit 183 shall be flipped to improve visibility of the front entry from the street for security. NOTE: The above comments have been inci�,rporated 'into the attached Resolution as Conditions of Approval. III. FACTSFrR FINDINGS* the project is consistent with.. the Victoria Comml..',fiy Plan and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacenti properties or cause significant environmental impacts. in addition, the proposed U06 is Am compliance 'with the applicable provisions of the victoria Community Plan, the Development Coae, and City standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff rsco=aenda that the Planning Commisision approve the Design Review of,, Tnmct 13281 through adoption of the attached Resolution with Coneltions. Resp lly s -q#ted. B a city lanner BB:SR:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Nation Map' Exhibit ^B" - Gxading/Plat Plan Exhibit-!17" .- Building Eleva':ior s Exhibit �'D "' , Appr --ved Elevations Resolution of Approval with Cmditioas � ,. r 'Ell 0701 -02 o, JUNE 12; 1991 P.C. AGENDA a { 2 of 7 } 0 r s� VONMVO u )iava Aumnoo `ceUON - o�uva U033- i IAW EIIZE6 l3dkll )IUVd A�!'+noo .._,. ZIP oil IP14 -- ^ iti31 #l�eb Sfs B i; {�; tl 2 1& .iii•' um its Z 1 � �aaott�• cwvwuSt+s '{ � � wi t. � g ut utq:e 1 wwt-tt it '�. 1 • b y� ti ff VI �s 3 i :: ili fla .t lli ui :� lu iu• all r + 43 i — _ of y+. 7 / I i ! HIM it n �'n S4i�: � ..000OQC•A •. ppc tt ! M �i f f i 4 � } eta gmgFm TO F.S. MEMBERS. W-Ur R j. fj M, 4 j�� i i a ti � v €' '! ►t F ',r. .� �. +r is a� a'x -F °• � I i s m y r a ..._ r•_ a 1 au All ui �• 1:i ui. � � en 3 Ie1 �_ !! a MI Alk � � _ - •• _ y ail• . '�,' °1 �.r — iii ?, Z iR- � y k �•� 'N' fii � F fa rJF Z,a.. �E . `1 �7 AM � ii � -2.. `�t •u {, 1� . t` t{F• Z' iii ?' r , � •af� ' Arty 111 � � 151- 1fI. }� _ .s r�'�•' iif a � i _ � 'iS i a � � •�. 's iii ; �' aca,•� may, !. riit � •'M, ~� ' * ui � __ y � . _` �� ' � � ' ,,8u i Q .[t yam.'_^ _ • 1� p C -title.& eft 4:7 lu `w L< to C F LLJ w m a . �aJR oa :• MEJ a or I it lu `w L< to C F LLJ w m a i{ WX ��c --•, - - ----- QQ o LL FS-E-3 <LL w ® w 0 -^ E uj j t: a .r aa t -- y4 C3 "o 0 ❑0 13F O� Q r (� W: LU 0 4' W e I L No © m U �a M. as 41_ s 7: - QQ LU 5 x - CIO ® , 3 LA _ � C ��• —�,�— .LL .1St ice,: EE-=i, W Lou J J, El CL C/3 1�' i- }ppi 3 x - - - -- b'F- F� o - OF o ygq�j� In {`n g:g LL + + O rNEE31 �_ Q IE. r w Ix o M uj La O N CL it i { A 9... 3 ► �� n o ❑ 0 S J Q Z Ol tA :---- j-F-: --aE QEI LU LU C N° -f1 4i Y � Y LL -- C m OC3 O W r - ML- Q. W C N f -; O p 8 5 Im- 0 i o� Ell ,00 1 o _ O I w U W J = O LU i LU `�` Q 0 m U a z` g CL • 0 LL. 0 cx: p, LA z 0 W -j LU V- 0 ui LA z 0 W -j LU V- 0 ui LU 0 at t5 Ali- lit } a p S S Iip$ z=_ ap iiz: °: ( _ 0 ❑Q EE C fl Z o g�g- i - LL C 7 © 1 I� uj LU ' a 'i c�9 �� lu B z O J W f LL W J Cg( z 0 T 1 W h S CB K a 'I z oy �w zm Q vV � � � V C F i U L rn c t i < z O n 1. P 9 CZ3 r t G IC 1 e `a rg_S 7 n\ d Ell Oc~7 z 0= W € � w �.�..r� Q 2 Y Q F LL! d W F W J s wi y .... two a ArA z oy Ow z > 2 O JU z Gri�1� m u ¢ U V r Q U z O H 4 w J 4J H z 0 FF W qlp i Ic IN If W s / M - -i-imllM F, i LAO LU t z c 1 z Oy �w ZM- O � U O u m IIL -� I 2 W W 1 a i �l d Z y2iO3 ui S� a� I � 9 W W W RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW' FOR 13UILI)ING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR 114 LOTS ON PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT 13281, CONSISTING OF 199 SINGLE F=—IT LOTS ON 33 ACRES OF LAND w IN THE LOW- MEDIUH RESIDENTIAL 'DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY (8 -14 DWELLINGI,UNITS PER ACRE), .LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE ;LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN S,VPPORT THEREOF APN: 227- 081 -06. A. Recitals u (i) Covington Homes has tiled a�a,\Qpplication for the Design Review o= Tract No. 13281 as described in the ti �i�� of this Resolution. Her, nafter the subject Design Revieca. request is referred to am "the application." (ii) Tentative Tract 13281 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on January 27, 1988, with a subsequent Design Review approved for all lots on June 27, 1_•990. (iii) on June 12, 1991, the Planning Commieclon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption ?f this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Caviaission of the City of 'Rancho Cucamonga as follows: i 1. This Commission hereby apecific&lly finds, *eat all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolutioir -are true and correct. 2. eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, during the above - referenced meeting. on June 12, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project is congistent with the objectives of the General Plan;: and (b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code, the Victoria Community Plan, and the purposes of the district in whichithe site is located; and t; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 13281 - COVINGTON HOMES - \ June 12, 1991 Page 2 r (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to he public health, safety or , welfare or materially injurious to properties O=A 1provements in the vicinity. (e) The application contemplates the construction'- -=of three door plans, each having three elevations. (f) The new products shall be Hotted on 114 of the 199 lots within the tract, specifically on lots 1 -1Gy 76 -88, 102 -138, and 146 -199. 3. Baz:. -? __upon the findings and cc elusions net forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standa::d Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. c => Planning Division: ° 1) Window panes to match the treatment used on the front elevations, shall be provided on the exposed escond -story elevations of those units which are visible from Rochester Avenue and Ellen East and all corner elevations. j 2) The unit on Lot 183 shall be flipped so that the entry is located on the eastern side of the home, therre-by increasing its visibility from the street' 3) All condit one of Planning, commission Resolution No. 88 -19, approving Tentative Tract 13281, shall apply. 4) Corner side yard slopes shall be landscaped and irrigated between sidewalks and walls, in. addition to required front yard landscaping. Engineering Division: 1) Line of sight designs shall be provided for the Berra Road /Ellena Road and Adria Zane /Rochester Avenue intersections an the grading` and landscape plans. Also,, line of sight on all residential intersect#.ons located on the ins_de of a curve shall be'� provided. Landscaping within the "area of colcern" shall_be approved by the City Engineer. t aa9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 13281 - COVINGTO S June 12, 1991 Page 3 2) The release of occupancies for _.5e homes contained in this project is subject to the provisions ijf City Council Resolution NO. 88- S57 which ,'shall .apply to the conditions of approval contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 88 -19 for Tentative Tract 13281, iii_- particular Condition No. 10 under Engineering Division requiring the construction of the Rochester. Avenue crossing of the Southern Pacific railroad. 3) The City's street improvement plans shall be revised to show any changes to the exiveway locrtions prior to issuance of building perm<.te. 4) Secondary access shall be provided from the east end of Tresenda Drive as approved by the Fire Department and the City Engineer. 4. The Secretary, to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman I, ATTEST: Brad Huller, Secretary , Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that -che foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, C Y adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSEN'Tt. COMMISSIONERS: C30 MITT ®R DEPARTMENT OF RANC040 CUCAOfl®iNGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT #: Dr -sc&u Rrutca t'oz TgA,_r 13281 SUBJECT: fla Lers 1 -10, '76-58. to7 -138* 14L -igg APPLICANT: Cnywf -rno kom6s LOCATION: NWL BPtSwNr Ran spin RoGNEsrtx Aysnwt Those items chedced are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION , (7414) 09.1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONORMNS. A. Time Limits 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, If building permits are not issued orapprovedwe has notmrr nenceciwiritk144rranthstrom thedatectapprovat. 2. Develol=erNDesign Review oral be approved prior to t r - 3. Approval of Teepee._- sect No. Is granted aMect to the approval of ---1 4. ThedevebpershaMcomrrrer4e, participateicr ,srrdconsumrnateorcauae lobe cia mrenced, participated in, or consummated, a Molio -Ryon Community Facilities Dftfzt (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamw a Fire Protection District to f i ancs aonstnxcion crd/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the developmeM The station shall be located, designed. and built to all spec#Wlk n of the RafoflB Cucamonga Fim Protection DWrIM ar4 shall become the Distrids property upon cornpietion. The squipment shat be selected by the DIW4 in a=rdance with b needs. In any buiklkg of a ration, tf rs developer shah comply with all applicable tares and . The CFO strait be lon'rad by the DisW and ft developer by the time reoordstfon of the final map occurs. S. Prior to recordation of the firral map or the Issuance of buldklg permits, whkhevercomes first, the appl caM shall consent to, or participate in, the estabUtment of a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District for rho constrtic Lion and maintenance of rwissary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities Dism. the appftM shah, in the sleemstivs, costs" to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District Wilorto ft tecordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever conies first. Furttrer, if the affected school district has not fomred a Mello -Roos Community Fackies Dxstrict within twelve months fmrr the date of approval of the project and prior to the recadailon of tta final map or issuance of bulldinp permits for said project, this condition dhall be deemed null and void: C31 SC • 2/91 1 of 12 S�laiao.mra J.! J_J J i. — J--1— p�«c �a.9�1328� Ssmsls��.2ue: This condition shall be waived it the Cfii receives notice that the applicant and all affected school dishicts have entered into an agreemerd to privately accommodate anyand all school impact3 as a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to bssuanca of building permits when no map is Involved, wrttte .. certification from the affected water district that adewate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposad project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days priorto final mapapprovalmrhthecasaofsubdivisionorpriortoissuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. a. Site Development c.� 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which �--1- include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior maieriats and colors, lmd,,oaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contsined heraln, Development Code regulations, and ;;peeifia -ter► and +l. yea- -. Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project she or business activity being zinmenced thereon, all J� Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancyof the facility shall notcommence untill such We as all Uniform Builditz. Cor—tA arid, _!—J State Fire Marshall's regulations have been compiled with. Prior to occulgincy, plans shall Division to to show compliance. The building shall be tope -sd for compliance prior tc occupancy. _ 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner t `view and approval prior to issuance of building permits. ✓' S. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and suntlmprovermni plans sWbe coordinated for -- 1--� -- consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as gradfn0.tree removM, encroachment, building , eta). or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdrision, or ap t,moved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive complum with all sections Of taut Development —� Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and appNcable Commt4*y Plans in effect at the time of Building Pam* issuance. ✓7. A detailed on-ake Vilog prep s.`all be reviewed and approved by the CRY Planner and J Sheriirs Deparimant (989 -6811) prior to the bojutnce of txtikikhg peMits. Such plan shalt indicate style, lNumination, lo,- idiom, t>nlp*a. and method of sNefding so as nm to adversely affect adjscent properties. 8. If no centralLad trash receptacles are provided, OX trabh pick -tau shall be for IrKWduat units with aA feceptaeles shielded from public view.. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are mquired and shah meet City scan W*. The final dtesitvh, facctitlns, —�--�— and the numltar of trash rerreptacss shall be sit *d to Cky Planner review and approval prior to issuance of bufldkV permits. 10. All ground - mounted utility appurtenances such as transtomiers. AC condensers. etc., shall ba located out of public view and adequately screened through tho use of a combinaWn of concrete or masonry wails, berming, andfor landscaping to the satisfaction of 9:3 City Planner. SC - 2/91 2af12 emea `o -ty) li7.Fi[ Completion Date• �✓ 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Pianr+ar review and at Irovai in accordance with the adopted 51reet Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. qW ✓ 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in 3 clear and concise manner, J _J including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and J J weed control, in accordance ,_th City Master Trail drawings, shalt be subrnstted for City Plannerreview and approval priorto approval and rec ordationof the FinalTractiJap and prior toapprovatof streetimprovement andgradingpians. Developer shaV i opgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with z lreet improvem3nis.. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohti the keeping ofequiilo ---1 -- animalswherezoning requirementsforthe keeping of said animaishave Wen met. individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without thenecessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' aisso :iatbns for amendments to the CC &Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and F 16strictions (CC &Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the �� Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded col=ffendiy with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded Copy shall be pravtded to the City Engineer. ✓ 16. All pafmays, open areae, and landscaping shalllm-permanentlymaintainedbytheproperty _lam owner, homeowner$' association, iz- means other means acceptable to the C1y. Proof of this landscpe maintenance shall be submitted for v iiy Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuances 0 building permits. 17. Solar access easements Enaid be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that Bach tot or --1—� dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sts4light across adjacent Iota or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may bra:: wMained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which ghat) be recorded concurrentfywith the recordation of th8 final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes fkV. The easements stn O prohibit tRe casting of shadows by vegetation, structures. fbdures or any other objets, V mpt for uti ft wires and similar 0*05, pursuant to DeveMp rierlt Coda Section 17.08.050 -G-2. 18. The project contains a designmed Historical Landmark. The site shall be devebped and JJ rnaiw -gyred in acoordarice with the Historic Landmark Alteratkin PAR* NO. . Any fuOer modif WOorts to the eke kKluding, but not Ytrrtitad to, exterior alterations arKVor irdedareXeraOmwhirrtaf(edthe extede. of the buOngsor structures. removal of landmark trees, demofdtion, miocs�n, reconstrtwtia n of buMir ga or structures, orchang6a to the site, shall require a mon,"hcation to the Hlstor' Landmark Alteration Permit subject 0 Historic Preservation Comniasion review and approval. C. Building DW911 1. An alternative eneW system Is ragrllred to provide domestic trot water for all dwiel rg units - aid for heating any swimming pool or spa. unless ether alternative OWN systems art demonstrated to be of er ,lvalenf capacity and e'iiciartcy. All swirrsrdng pools Walled at tR time of initial development shall be supplemented whit solar heating. Detaifa 'shall be Included in the !chill plans and shall be sut=%4d for City Planner review and a, mvaf / prior to the issu nce of building pern'dil. ✓ 2 All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural -J- -�--- treatment. detailing and increased delineation of surface treatmord subjeci'tc City Planner review and approval pdnr to issuance of building permits. SC -2191 zor12C3'3 i Comotetim Dew: 3. Standard patio covet plans,for use by the Homeowners, Association shall be subrnitted for te_ City PlannR =and f3WLP: i;>'"lat review and ap pmval prior to issuance of buBdingpemAs. AOL _ ✓ 4. Ail rcof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other root mainted equipment andlor �s projections, shall be shielded from views and the sound buffered tram adjacent properties and streets f.:s required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details st ;Ji be included in building plans. 0. Puking and Vehicular Access (indicate dettalts on building plants) 1 All parking lot landscape( sfarWB shall have amirtlmum outside dimension of6 feet and shall r — contain a 12 -inch wads adjacent to the paring stall (intuiting curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall ba �--� — �'� provided throughout the developmentto connect: dyiel iings turittsibuildingswb open spaces/ plans/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shaft be double stripe, per City standards arxt all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers tf driveways are less han 18 feet in �--�— depth from bads of Sidewalk 5. The Covenants, Condftns and Restrictions shall restftthe storage of remational vehicles JJ on this site unless they are the principal sou1Q0 of transportatlonfor the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than In designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any sece.dy gates shaft be subminsd for the City Planner - City Engineer. and -�--� Rancho Cucamonga Fire Prolectian ©tstrict revisward &-,provalprWto issuanceof buildirq permits. E. landscaping (1107 n, 01 ty taatrliatrlerx 1111111112OW arsM pater to motion N.) 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, Including 6" pl2r4ing and model home tandscW -f—J —" ing in the case of residential development, shah be prepared by a iicen:,ed landscape architect and submitted for City Planrw review and apWMI priorto the issuanoe of building permits or prior fMat map OW*Mal in the Casa of a custom let . 2. Existing :teesrectuiredtobetw,as wedindaceaWtm protesded with a construction ban ter inaccof arreswiththeAiurt* alCodeSedion19 .0e.110,androrotedanthe grading plans. The i°A;atW of those trees to bs preserved In piacu and now locatforvs far franspiari ad trees shall beshownonthed6UI*liartds Wopians. The appkm OiaNtoNow Oaf the taborisl's rera9mmem4dions nWrOM preservation, tninsplartfktg and( rIfi irg methods. 3. Aminimumof freeapergm$ 3acm, ccnVrWafthefoYaMngsizes ,st0bepmvided —J--� wshtn the pm 1m: %- 48- inch box or larger, %- 316- tnrh box or larger, —%- 24- inch box or larger, __ _ _ %- 15-galtor, WW _% -5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees O Med within the A n.100 shall ba q* ktsen she trees - 24 -inch box or larger. S. WWI parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 116-Gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% rol the parking area at sota imn on Augt:st 21. SC -2/91 4of l2 ._lei- 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of c view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per SO linear feet al buil li* ^7. All private slope banks 5 test or less in vertical height and of 5,1 orgreaterslope, but less than 2:1 slope, sh,lll be, at minimum, i"ated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shOl include a permanent irrigation sysiam to be Installed uy the developer prior to occupancy. 8. All private slopes in excessof 6 feet, but lessthan8 feet invertica , height andot2:1orgreater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15 -gallon or larger size tree pits each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope areri, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excase of 8 feet ir, •-- rtfcat helglY. and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5 -gatlon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slops area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be Installed by the daveloper prior to =uparicy. ✓ 9. For single family residential development, ah slope plantirQ and Irrigation shall be continu- ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer uMN each individual unit is soid and occupied by the buyer. Priorto releasing occupaneoyferthose units. anInspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are In satisfactory condition. 10. For muNi- f3nNly residential and non- residentlat development, property owners are respon- sfble for the continual maintenance of all tandscaped areas on -sits, as well as contiguous planted areas with in the public right-of -way. All landsc wd areas sho" N kept free from weeds and debris and mzintained in a healthy and thriving condition, -anU receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaoad, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shag be replaced within 30 days from the date rat damage. 11. Front yard landscaping sh311 be required per the Development lode . This requirement nhalt be In mddttlon to the required street trees and sl*,9 planting. �1�12. The final design M the perimeter parkways, waft, landscaping, and sWwaiks shall be Induded in the required Ian bW. plants and shall be subject to City Plarutsr review and approval and coordinated forcosesistencywHh any patkway lariaf:impingplanwhichmaybe required by the Engineering Division. ✓13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial mck, spectrnen size trees, meander - Ingt�ffs�wlser, a!ks (with NW--,nW ehsiye), acrd intemi(led lay , Is required along 14.tandscapkV 3iotIrrigationsya am required to beinstaltedwithhrltbptrbk right -ol wlayon the pertnlettor of this pcojbat area shall be contirwously maintained by the developer. 15. All wags shag 59 pmW:Md withdecorativv treatment. H located in puM maintenance areas, the design shalt be coordinated with the Engineering Divert. t/ 16. Tree Maintenance criteria shag be developed and K&Wed for Cky PWAne, review and approval prior to %P –fiance of ba:iidkrg pennies. Thew F,abffil5 "I encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. ✓ 17. t-ar►dscaping and Irrigation shall be designed to ctrnsanre water, through the pritmoles of Xeriscapa as defined in Chapter 1,9.16 of tfw Ranches Cucamonga Mur icepai Code. 3C - 2/91 5 of 12 ProitGt et Complation Dom: —1,--J- -J,---J- p - . YL r3Z91 �7�SSL o Comvteam Dam: F. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not apart of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall compty with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approvatbythe Planning Division priorto installation of any signs. _— 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and —./ --- J approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, ortownhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate appl&,atlan and approval by the Planning Dvision prior to wsuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rode _J�J Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the CITY Planner, priorto accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shalt provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City P.dopted —�—�- Special Studiss Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a stawfard format as determined by the City Planner, onor to accepting a cash deposit on ar<j property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective barer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a starxiard format z� s determined by the Cily Ptannar, prior to accepting a cash deposit on 0 ; property. _-%Z .4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planter review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level Of Interior noise attenuation to below 45CNEt„ the building matedais--�d Construction techniques provided, and If appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will in cnerked for conformance with the mitigation measures cnrrfained in the final report. H. Other Ays 'Its 1. Emergermy secondary access shall be provided Ingacodahcewah Rancho Cu ^AmngaFire —�--� Protection District Standards. ✓ 2. Emergency access shall be provided, mahanance free anddear,aminli umot26feetwide I —J--J- at all times during construction in accordartc a with Rands Cucart (hW r'ire Protection District requirements. V--'. 3. Prior to iB w&nce of buiWng pewits for oombuo* cons action, evidence shall be _J_J submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire P+vteetlon DWrricttttattemporary water supply for fire protadtcrl ig avalaWA, pending completion of required fire protection system. 4. The appkant shat contact: ft U. S. Postal Stivias to detemtlne the appropriate type and _ kwcailon of meJ boxes. hfultRamHy residential develapmertts shall provide a solid overhead sW=ra for mail boxes with adequate rlpMk*. The beat locathan of the mO boxes and the design of the ovivrlvad sinrc'ttrr® shalt be subject to Cky Piannerreview and approval prior is tNe Issuance of building permits. 5. For projects using septic talk facilities, wrMerw certification of amptabiiky, including all supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Haailh and submitted to the Building OffieW prior to the ls,ssuance of Septic i Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of btfa tg p�enTits. !,C • 2/91 a of 12 ( `� pmj= NO.: DRi' u Ccmuleam Dace: APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE SUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989 -1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Site Development ✓ 1. The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, UnHor Mechani- cal Coda, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in erect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please nontact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. ✓ 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new resid tilai dwelling uni(s) or major addition -J—j -- to existing unit(s),the applicant shall pay developmentfees at the established rate. Suchtees may incudt, but are not limitedto: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School. Fees. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a rrew commercial or Industrial development or J—J addition to an existing development, the applicarA shall pay development tees at the establhhed rate. Such fees may include, bet are not L>mlted to: System Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Pl;3n Checking Fees. ✓4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official. altertraWparcel map recordation any p6or to issuance cf building permits. J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances AMIL considering use, area, and fire- reststivaness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings ohali be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removes, tilled andforcapped to comply with the Uniform Plumbing Corte and Urlorm Building Code. 4. Undergiound on -site utiis!es am to be located and shown an building plena submitted for JJ_ building permit appkation. K. Grading _ 1. Grading of the t:ubfec t .Mpedy Shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City --�—J Grading Standardo, and acospted grading practices. The fatal grading plan shall be in substantial conformar4a with the approved grading plan. ✓2. A soils report Shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Callfomla to - J---�— perform such work. 3. The devSbP=rt its lowled within the soa erollion control boundaries; a Sole Disturtmm Permit IS rewired. PleaseccattactSanBernardincCountyDepartrrlertofAgriculture at (714) 387 -2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the Issuance of rough grafkg permit. 4. A geoiogiral report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at -J- -J -- the time of application for gang Man check. V00' S.' Thefinalgradintjplansshall becompkYtedandapprovedpriortoImanceofbuildingpermits. .^J_/— 0,57 SC - 2 /91 Tot 12 4m�m tio.ai� 13LS1 6. As a cusfonrlot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on -sae - drainage facilities necessary for dewatering Pit parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto finalmap approve, and prior to It.a issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted ontt, or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building pennits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the .subdivided - properties, ara to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage lbws Onl6Ting, leavirr, or within a parcel relative to which a building perms is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Buildings and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of buikiing and grading permits. (2'his may be on an irwremental or composite basis.) e. All slaps ba-%s in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses orplanted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of dingorsomeother alternative method of erosion control shall be completed tothosati ;_Alonofthe Building Official. In addition a permaidnt irrigation system shall be wovided. This requirement does not release the applicanydsv,rebper from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 f of the Development Code. APPUCANT SIMLL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (T14)989.JMFOR k0MPUAWCE WITH THE FOLLO WING CONDITIONS L Dedication and Vehicular Accsso 1. Rights -of -way and easements shall be dotcated to ft City for all interior public streets. community tralls, public paseas, public areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans an&or tentative map. Private easemertsi for non-public fac,iltes (cross -lot drainage, local feetiertraiis, eta) shall be reserved as shown on the plans a»d/or tentative map. 2. i ldication shall be m®de of the f0Now1ng rights ofavay on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): total het on total lest on 4otal feet on total fact on �3. An irrevocalgeofferofdedi=iorfos - foot+ aroas4raygaaetlterdshatibemad( for all private streets or drives. 4. Nor velfouiar afxsiss shall be dedicated to the City for the fOlMi g stfdsts: J Alk MW J._J^ a __J_1 J_J 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided enaurin0 acre's to all parcels by CMids or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the Issuance of building permits, where no map is involve 1. /7g SC,2191 6of12 JJ� 6. Private drainage easements forcross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall ba delineated or noted on the final map. t. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10 -foot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring M °adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: "Me Nreby ded sate to the City of Ranchr Cucamonga the right to prohibit the constroction Of (residential) buildings (or of ler stnrctures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas." A maintc 'aance agreement shall also be granted irom each lotto the adjacent lot through the COMI's. 8. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quitclaimedor dellneatedon the final n!ap. S. 'Easements for public sidewaks and/or street trees placed outside the public right -of -way shall b9 dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10, Additional street right -of -way shadbe dedicated along right turns tames, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from IN face of curbs. it curt: adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The deveopersfuali make a good faith effort to acquire the required off -site property interests necessary to construct the roquired public Improk"ements, aril lf he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final rap for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Goverimnt Code Section 66462 at such time asthe City acquires the property Interests required forthe UnlNovements. ASk Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs Incurred by the City WIF to acquire the off -site property Interests "ired Inconnectlon with the subdivision. Security for a portion of theca costs shall be in'the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencenlert of the appraisal. M.Strnet improvarrserttsr 1. All public improvements (interior streets, dra4haga tackles, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plam and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interim Street trripfovements saaN include, but are rot limited to, curb and gutter. AC pavement. drive apprrsacthss, sMewaks, street I1", and streettrees. 2. A nhinknum of 26-foot Wide pavement. wthhin a 40 foot wW@ dedicated right- of-way shall be constructed for all half- socfion sheets. 3. Construct the following perinWer street Improvements lino ling, but not limited to: �: i sc. PM'= Compfedm Due: --J--J- _/ —il Jam_ J pm�.yo.QQ13L$l . - Comdetia+D�� Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and frrigzIlon on meter. (b) Pavemei� reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) ll so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (d) if so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement clam°' °41 udling street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- - -J—J -- tered Civil Engineer, shalt be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shalt be posted and an agreement executed to the sati &dlon of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public andfor private street improve - ments,priorto final map approval orthn issuance otbuikling permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right -ot -way, fees shall be paid and a _J_J_ construction permit shell be obtained from the City Ergincem., .0'lfloa in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name siEning, and interconnect conduit _JJ - shall be installad to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduitwithpuli boxes sha: lbe Installation anynm7constnictionorreo .-struction — J--J -- of major, secondary or collector streets which iraersact with other major, secondary or collector sweets for future traffic signals. PUN boxes shag be placed on both sides of the street at3 feet Outside of BCR, ECRorany other locations approved byth9City Engineer. Notes: (t) All pull boxes shall to No. 6 unless Otherwise spy by the City Engineor. (2) Conduit shalt be 3 -inch galvanized steel with pullntpe. e. Wheel chair ramps shaft be k►atayed on all four corfwm of k femecions per City Standards or as directed by the CNv.Enpineer. f. Existing City roads requirirt9 construction shall rMnairt open to tmaffic std all times With —�—� adequate detours duringconstncction. AstrattClosuteparmlinWfbe mWkW. A h Lo C deposit shad be provided to ver the cost of Qr86V and paving, s refunded upon completion of the constmftn to the s"acxion of ttt®City Engineer. g. CortcenWeddrWringe flows shall WCrM . Under sld8Avaflcdratas shall be I its &W 10 CkyStandards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as Specified by t?s Cly Engineer' i. Street nsntes Mall bea pprovedby the CifyPlasmnerpdortostfbmlttalforfkst plan check. 1—aJ S. Street i np oveawnt piers per Zky Starmdtwds for as private streets shall be ptzvi� r J—!— review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work bekg pedormf ed or. j vats streets, fees shalt be paid and constnggion perm nb I�W be obtained from the City Engineor's Office in additionto any other permits required. 6. Street trees, a ml";,Wm of 15- gallon size or larger, shall be Insured per City Standards in —J_l_ accordance,with the City's street tree program. SC - 2/91 1001`12 7. Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with Cenu+leaa„ Da¢: adopted policy.. --J--J- a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, —��- Irrluding driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be locatad outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructbn3 wihin the lines of sight shall be approvsd by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeabtlity improved, usually by J_J moving the 2 +/- closest streettrees on each side away Immthe street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shalt be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within' 4 following right -al -way: 9. Ali public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complefe prior to the issuance of building permits: N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and Irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works StarKmids J—J- shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and appmvai prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following gape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, traits, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join andtorform Me appropriate Landscape and Lighting J Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior tofMal map aWmvalor issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs sh3A be borne by the developer. 3. All required public tarxiseaping and irfigatonsystems. shallbecontinuous ly maintained bythe —IJ developer until accsptW by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on tha following streel(s) shall confom M3 the recaults of the respective —/—! Beautification !Waster Plan: O. Drainage and Flood Csrhinal 1. The project (oe portions thorsot) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood � — —J proteCdon mMaaures shag be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by ft City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone JJ_ designation removed from the project ands. The developer's engbheer shall prepare all necessary reports, pkm, and hydrokcigirJhyd he calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtaired from FEMA prbr to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final I _J t- map approval or the 'issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage I facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. SC -1/91 1101!14 c //! 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right -of -way. S9mpicuon Datrt- J_J 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm dre.n pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey ovarfiows In the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, wator, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable N (ail undergroury in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shalt be. provider! as ret v-i. 2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilRies as necessary. 3. Water and sewer piarkl shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water Dlstrfat (CC&WD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compiiance from the CCWD is required priorto final map approval or issuanzo of permits, whichever occurs first. G. General Requiremanto and Approvals 1. Th e separate parceiscontainedwithin the projbat boundaries shall be ftWIycombined into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prla, to ilium neap approval or issuance of building pemnits, whichever oc win first, for: 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shaft be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apporilonir, the sasessmergs under Assessment District arr*ng the newly created. parcels. 4. Etiwandal5an A value Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regions!, and Master Plan Drainers Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval gr priorto building permit issuance it no map fs involved. S. Permits shall be obtained from the following agtrzies for work within trek rigid -of -way: 6.A signed consW and wahrer form to pin and/or form the taro! Enforcement Communky Facilities Dftsbioi 0 ill be filed with the City Engines prior to final map approval or the issmrance of building permits, whichever oc ou s firs~. Fora tioit costs, shah be bome by the Developer. 7. Prior to fmgzatfon of any dgveio, -finer t phase, sWftdent iori A —iment plants shait be com- pleted beyond the phase boilndadi s to assure secondary access and dreJnap protection to the satisfaction of tt:e City Engineer. Phase bouWariel shy correspond to lot Wines shown on the approved len`aallve reap. SC- 2101 12 of 12 141 AML J—l- _J---/ J_t _J_J JJ i _J_/_ . - -J- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT rkf U IC f DATE: June 12, 1999 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Bulled {, City Planner BY: Beverly NiseeYA, Asaociate.Pl�nner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13564 - AKINS A request for an extension of a previously approved County'°= tract map consisting of 182 lots on 117 !acres of land,' located north of Summit Avenue and east of Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 226- 082 -24, 25, 'and 26. I\' I. BACKGROUND: Tantative Tract 13564 was approved by the County of San Bernardino on August 24, 1987, and revised by the County Planning Commission on November 17 1988. It,-Includes $ phases on 117 acres. An Annexation Agreement was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and entered into as of January 7, 1989. According to Section 3.7 o? the Development Agreement; Tract 13564 was due to expire on August 24, 1990. The applicant was graiited a one - year Time Extension on August 22, 1990. The tract is now due to expire on August 24, 1951. Section 3.7 of the Development Agreement states that the city will, at a minimum, extend the map two years (tc August 24, 1992). II. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the proposed Time Extension and has compared the proposal with the development criteria outlined in the Development and Annexation Agreements. Based upon this review, staff determined that the project meets the requirements of the Development and Annexation Agreements. IIL FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the fo�ilowing findings in order to,approve this applicati4nt A. There have been no significant changes in the band Use Element of the General Plan, Development Code, or character of the area which would cause the project to become inconsistent or non - conforming. B. The granting of an extension would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. TTEEj D r I% PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 13564 AXINS June 12, 1991 Page 2 IV. RECOMMENaAIZION: Stafi recommends that the Planning Commis on a(" rc,re a. one -year Time Extension for Tentative Tract ,13564 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respe y s �ed Brad er City, lanner BB:BN /jfs Attachmeftts: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" Tract Map Resolution of Approval i _.....� e►.r 3 5 6 FMOE WILLUMS UNDGREN tW ChifEngineers•- 'And5untyars MAY QN PI "131.0103 April 24, 1991 TI MA1x2sAl.0 A Ms. Beverly Nissen City of Rancho Ca, �nonga 3.05CO Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Subject: Tentative Tract Map Nu. 1356s4 Time Extension r Dear Ms. Nissen: I am requesting on behalf of Akins Development Comprny and Rockfield DevelopriAat Corporation a second one year extension of the above referenced Tentative T, %i Map. This request is consistent with — the terms of the development agreement. Enclosed is the a�on fee of $62.00. Thank you for your continued diligence regarding this project. Sincerely, FUSCDE, WMI IAMS, UNDGREN do SHORT, INC. JoYn °C. Olivier ©E�_� Project Manager ICO jb cc: Kev P*Mwn, Akins Developmeot Company Sonny Geary, RockHeld Development Corporation 4i ;,} I165t5te*:,, -Ac nw- SufteA- buts*C,& mia92503`Pbone(714)354.0161 FAX(714)354-08th r+ 11 I i 1 � F � .`i i c Z! .i 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13564 LOCATED NORTH OF SUMMIT AVENUE AIM EAST OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD- _ AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 226- 082- 24,,,25,'AND 26. _ WHEREAS, a request has been filed for s Time Extension for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 3.7 of the Development Agreement_ for Tract 13564. ' i WHEREAS, the County Planning rommission cc- .Iditionally al; r'- ':-red the move- described subdivissan on August 24, 1987. II SECTION is The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed 'marker climate for'- developm'+nt of the 1 £roject, B. That current economiCr markw, and 9st.entory conditions make it unreasonable .'to fevelop the project at this time._ C. That stssct enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not bL consistent with the inthnt of tria Development Code. D. That the granting of said Time Extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. �SEi.TION 2s Tho Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a Time Extension fors groiectpalicantxniration Tract 13564 Fudeos, Williams, August 24, 1992 Lindgren & Short APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMIS.,ION OF THE CITY OF WICHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman n Alit KING COIMISSION RESOLUTION NC, V XTENS-ON FOR 7.0 135E4 - AKINS Juns 12, 1992 Page 2 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing -jtesolution was duly and regularly €tt.Xc°iaed, passed, and adopted7by the Planning Commissirt of the City of Rancho'Cucamonga, at a regular nesting of the Plarnting Commission held on the 13th day of June 1991, h, the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIONLRS: NOES: COW41SSZONERS: ABSENT; COMISSIONEFs: AML r a 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT r- DATE: June 12, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steven Ross, Assi'tant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 1'674 - MIGHTY DEVELOPMENT - A residential subdivision consisting of 18 singlP,family lots on 11.29 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2'dwelling units per acre), located on the dest side of AVethyst Street north of Valley View Drive - APN: 1061 -401. 13. I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13674 was conditionally approved by the Planning --ommission on May 26i 1988. On June 23, 1990, the Commission approved a one -year Time Extension of the Tentative Map in order to allow the applicant additional time to record the Final Map. Sectica 66452.6 of the State Map Act allows for up to 36- months of extension, which may be granted in 12 -month increments. On January 23, 1991, the Planning Commission approved the Design Review &pplication for 18 custom homes for the tract. The applicant is requesting that the tentative tract approval be extended Eor'an additional year to allow for recordation of the Final Map. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: staff has anrlyzed the proposed Time Extension request and has compared the propoe ±l with current development criteria outlined in the Development Code. Based upon' t'�is review, staff has determined that the project meets the basic',_ standards for development in the Very Inw Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). rj B. Hisa.side Development Ordinance: `The site has a natural slope cis' approximately 8 -0 percent from north to south, except for approximately 1.5 acres of land directly adjacent to the western property line, where slopes vary from 12 -16 percent. Although the tract r__a approved prior to the adoption of the Hillsile Development Ordinance, the tract meets the intent of the Hillside Development Ordinance even though it was approved two years prior to the adoption of the Ordinance. The Design Review for-the homes was processed after the adoption of the i rmo,. PLANNING COMMISSION,5TAFF REPORT Tr 13674 - MIGHTY'ZiV$LOPMENT ` June 12, 1991 Page 2 Ordinance and does cctimply with all of its ra velgpment recoumend granting the Time' standards Therefore,,atEff would Extension request, III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application: << R. There have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element of the Gereral Plan Development Cods, or character of t *a area within which the project is located that would cause the arproved project to become inconsistent or :ion - conforming. would not be detrimental_ to the B. The granting of an extension public health, safety, or welfare or materially 'injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. r IV. RECOMMENDATION: staff recommends that the Planning Commission 13674 approve a one -year Time .Extension for Tentativu Tract through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respe submkgted, Brad er City P] arner BB:SR:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit ^B" -- Vicinity Map Exhibit "C" - Subdivision Map Resoll° :iOU No. 8B -104 Resolution Approving Time Extension a MIGHT Development Inc. 'Feh, (714) 944.8181 _ . 9229 Utico Avenue, X120 Fax: (714) 944.1325 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 .G. CITv nF., qr t r ur Cl1CAnepNGA May 6, 1991 A RA Steve Ross Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive Ranch, CucamongaX, CA 91729 " RE: Tent�.,,_ive Tract 13674 Dear Steve: Our tent:Ative map will expire May 25, 1991. As you know, the plan went through design rev.-w and was a;pxr.oved by the mlanning Commission on January 23, 1991. The ;final map 'Y.d public improve- ment plans are undergoing plan check by the Engineering Depart- ment right now. We need more time to complete this project; we therefore request time extension for one y,,�-ar. j Thank you. Sincerely, Jo nn.Weng, President Mighty Development Inc, General Partner of Amethyst Estates L.P. e f l _ ' UEM: F� I 7P471 4OF I�3�- CUCAM0NGA PLANT I0N TLE; Fop AMG EXHMIT: A SCALE: "' - M an v new mmmLfl6Mmt6 mm 4 omwo —A .1. 0 sm 0 op COMM zm..=30w. M M 'ft. rrEM.T.Ls% &r, lw 4v—. 1362t rlY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TULE- N PLANNING DIVISION.. EXHIBM C SCALE: RESOLUTION NO. 88 -104 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CIl "--OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13674 LOCATED WEST OF AMETHYST STREET, NORTH OF VALLEY VIEW IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) DISTRICT A. Recitals. (i) Lenk Development has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13674 as described C.n the title of this Resolution. He iinafter in this Resolution, .the subject Tentative Tract Map request is re,:rred tows "the applications" i` (ii') On the 15th of May 1988 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed pubiic hearing on the`appiicstion and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to t;,e adoption of t�is Resolution have occurred. i B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on May 25, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at West side of Amethyst. North of Valley View with a street frontage of 666 feet and lot depth of 858.33 feet and is presently unimproved; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and designated for flood control 'purposes, the property to the south and east of that site consists of existing single family residences and is designated_ for Very Low Residential {less than 2 dwelling units per acre); and (c) The proposed subdivision design and accompanying maps have beet'. reviewed by the Technical and Grading Committees and approved subject to the conditions contained within this resolution; and (d) That the proposed subdivision has minimum and average lot sizes of 20,070 and 23,872 square feet crnsistent with requirements of th Very Low Density Residential District; and. r, K. E: PLANNING COMMISSI ILSOLUTION NO. 7,13674 LENK-- May 25, 1988 Page 2 U M�. i (e) The related variance applicatic.3 Variance 87 -14 has been reviewed and approved by the Planning commission; and (f) That there is adequate space available on all lots for equestrian use. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence precented to this,.Commi.ssion during the above - referenced public hearing and upon t?,. .specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commi,tb.'�n hereby finds and concii.des as follows: (a) That tentative>_ tract is consistent with the General 'Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the ;tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan,; Development Code, and specific plans; a %d (c) The site iw physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause - substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health pvoblems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has,-,-,,---- been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Envrcf"iT..:a[ Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the fti►:3ings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein 4�- this reference. i E7 ,r PLANNING COMMISSIk RESOLUTION NO. , 713674 - LENK ,May 25. 1988 Page 3 V *, Tentative Tract (1) final landscaping and irrigation plans for the parkway along Amethyst Street and and for interior street planting shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner and City Engineer prior to recordation of the FinaljTract Map. (2) An in -lieu fee rs contribution to the future undergrounding on "ihe existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Amethyst Street shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the Final Map. The fee shall' be one -half the City adopted unVY amount times the length of the project frontage: (3) An equestrian trail plan shall be provided indicating widths, maximum s bpes, fencing and weed control in accordance witW,,;city equestrian trail standard drawings, which shall be submitted for review and approval prior to recordation of the Final Tract Map, and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans and shall include the following; a) Drainage from the north shall be carried when the equestrian trail easement in an improved structure. b) Equestrian. trails with steep grades - require installation of permanent devices (i.e. burried curbs or treated timber). c) Permenent crossings to allow access from trails to rear, yards will be required. The crossings shall include wood, bridges, concrete' pipe, concrete box or other acceptable design. d) Gates should be- provided for each lot to allow`' access to local trails. j e) Two rail peeler logs fencing should be used instead of split rail fencing for local trails. fencing should be 'located on the inside of trails only. l ti 'sue PLANNING COMMISm,I4 IESOLUTION NO, TT13674 - LENK May 25, 1988 Page 4 Amok (5) On /site drainage to be directed westerly from the r, site shall be disposed as follows in order or preference approved the City Engineer, Buildiraq Official,, andr�an Bernardino flood Control District where appropriate; a) Directed southerly through thr vacant lot.. adjacent to the south west corner of the site within an easement to Valley View Strjet;:__i b) Oirectly westerly within the �:�n. Bernardino County flood Control District p&iperty out - letting into Hellman Avenue, or C) Directly westerly within the San Bernardino County Flood Control District property out - letting into the existing earth channel serving as an outflow from demens basin. (6` Train and lot drainage existing at the south west corner shall be conveyed to either; a) The :,Puth ttirough a private easeme nt to a point of o," .&charge to a public facilI y by a service improvements maintained by Homeowners Association or; b) The, '�-st to the channel , in a surface- improvement and maintained by agreement ex,;cuted with the County. In either case, absolute protection of southerly properties' will be provided with channels, berms, walls or other - acceptable devices,-,�s determined in Plan Check based upon the Q Idd discharge, (7) The private drive shall be curved northerly ,within parcel IS as .Much as possible to minimize height of fill slopes. (a) Maintenance of nacessary of off -site drainage f!acilitias and the private drive (lot A) shall be included within the projects CCSR`s. _ (S) Sfdewalks -shall be installed on at least one side of the private drive. PLANNING COMMISST RESOLUTION N0. TT13674 - LENK May 25. 1988 Page 5 (10) Prior to recordation, a total development package, including plot p: ns, elevations aj/ /) grading shall be reviewed and approved by the -- /Design Review Committee and shall also include public notification of the same. Design .Review (1) All lot grading whether in conjunction with a total design review application or individual costom lots, shall,'utilize grading techniques which miimiz°_ the alteration to the natural lardform. These techniques should include minimal padding for units only, split level foundations, and /or stem wall construction. -_ (2) All trails and parkway landscape improvements shall be constructed and improved at the time of street construction. (3) Details of the decor %.tive masonry wall adjacent to Amethyst Street shall be included in the final landscape and irrigation plan. (4) Texturized paving shall be provided at the drive entrys outside rf the public right -of -way. (5) All side and rear elevations of any proposed buildings shall be, upgraded with architectural detailing. (6) All cross -lot drainage shall be etiminated by the use of berms and swales on the lot or origin. (7) All required drainage devices shall be improved to the extent required based on hydrology and hydrol.ics supplies in Plan Check. (8) Additional ,grading of front yards to eliminate drainage pdc ats will be required and the extent of such grading shall be deterwined in Plan Check. (9) No surfacr ',drainage will be allowed to cross Vie Commenity` .ail or other public improvements. (10) As much on -site drainage as possible shall be ; directed to Amethyst Street. ,ii) The location and design of any permiter fence /wall shell be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee. C10 PLANNING'yOMMISSI RESOLUTION NO. TT13674 -;aENK May 25, 1988 i Page 6 Alk �t (12) A minimum unit size of 2500 square feet shall be required: ` 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall eertifµ to the adopt?pn of this Resolution. t APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY, 1988. G PLANNING COMM "SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOWGA arry . , a '\ ATTEST: _ ra e e=reL rye'_ _ F Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning C61wission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regulaF'�eeting of the .Manning CwmmisFion held on the 25th day of May, 1988, by the fo`iloaing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSINERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, BLV4LEY, EMERIU. MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE J s. � 3 U RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCApIONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROMG A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1.3674, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 10.61 - 401 -03- A. Recitals (i) Mighty Dsvelopa,,-'It has filed an .'Pplicacion for the extension of Tentative Tract Nc- 13674 as described in t'hs title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On Fay 25, 1938, this .ommission adopted its Resolution No_, 88 -104 thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative 'Tract No. 13674. (iii) - On May 23, 1':i90, this commission adopted its Resolution No. 90 -60, thereby approving d one -year Time Extension for Tentative Tract 13674. (iv) All legal'preraquii�ites prior tc the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, datexusinxd, and rev lved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamd r, y4s follows: 1. This commission hereby speci .eeily fit -_. that all o: the facts set forth is the Recitals, Part K, of th . Resolution W:e true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial avident. ,presented to this Commissi PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. l TE 13674 .- 14IGHTY DEVELOPMENT June 12, 191 Page 2 AM 3. Based uhon the findings and copclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants, 'T me Exte:,sion for: ' r, Tract An�licant :?xpiration 13674 flighty Dwe?opment hay',25, 1992 4. The Secretary to this Com gissi on shall certify to the adoption bf this RaSOlution. , APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH_ :i1it OF JUNE 1A91. PLANNING Cr)MMIESI0N -,, OP THE CITY OF MCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _ Barry T. NcNiel, Chairiaaa 3LTT EST: Brad Buller, Secretary Braze °' 3.ler, SEcretary of the Plenning Commission of. the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing.- RdsolutaOq was duly ar_e regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by tha_ Pl nning Commission mr the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meaning of +fie Planning Commission held on the 12th day bf June 1991, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: i ABSENT: COMMISSIOHEPS.- _ E1 DATE: TO: F_AM: BY: SUBJECT: 4 r - --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA j STAFF REPORT June 12, 1991 Chairman and Meml,Irs of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner ) Scctt Murphy, Associute'Planner �Z9IR�7�'MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMhNDPL"KT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CU�NWONGA - A- request to amend the Davelopment Districts Mao from "OP" (0.1fi.ce Professional) to "FBSP" (Foothill Boulevard Specific P_:=) for an t 8.3 a.:re parcel located cat the northeast 'comer of Faothj2.!. Boulevard and Rochester Avenue' APN: 227 - 152 19 and 30. Staff recommends issuance of a 'Negative Declaration. M11,1RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN-b rOOTRILL BOULEVARD SPECIFYC PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -01 CITY OFF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A equest to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to iv:lude the 8.3 acr2 parcel at the northeast corner of Fcothill Boulevard anO, Raches:ex,A�renue within Subarea 4 and establish standards for d- re h1pment AI-N: 227 - 152 -18 and 30. Staff recomxs4id_- issuance of a Negative Declaration.. t ENVIRONMENTAL aSSESSMEK.T AND TERPA VISTA COWUYIT`! PLAN AMENOME::T 91.01 - CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA -.A request to establish certain streetsuape and site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Spei ific Plan for that portion of Foothill BouS V -4 &w , within the Tar.,_ 'Vista Planned Community +, Staff recommends issu- cc of a ' Neg 'iva "sclaration. EUVIRONIINTAL ASSESSZ -=T AND VI-IrORIA - XK- IUNITY PuM4 AMENDMENT 91 -01 CITY i1F RANCHO CUSWN, A - A reques'c to establ`sh certain street_scape and site desim,m standards consiste,.t with the Foothill '80uleW'td Specific Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard withi,�,t the 'Victoria Planned Community. iff reuo—ends issuance of a j Negative Leclaratiun. ENVtRON!MT.?iL ASSESSMEW, (� - a'A_:^'s IFIE PLAN �1MENC' ^ 97-04 - CITY Or -,., y A request to estaL_ certain streo_,sscap.,. �?n standards consistent with the Foothill 'x#od z ',3c Plan for that portion of Foothill BoulevarZr ''.. c iti Industrial Area Specific Plan. staff recommends 'i:ssuanca of a Negative Declar,tioc- `! ITERS F-T tt% ' PhAI2NING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DDA VI -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tune :2, 1991 Page '.2 j± .M I. BACKGROUND: These itess x-_•re continued from the April 24, 1991 I Planning Com+is! 'meeting to allolr staff 1co:..w ^rk`with affected r') property owners (o.' refinements to the.'e:.00thiiI Boulevard Design Supplement. Several meetings have taken r with the major focus being direct'( a- three eletients of the Desiyri Supplemer. -c - 1) arnhitec.;ural atyle of the activity centers, 2) building hef!;• t i- axd setbicks at the activity ce -tiers, and 3) landscaping. II. DISCUSSIOA: a A. Activity Center Architecture - Under the Foothill. Boulevard Specific Plan, 1�peci'fic,architecturai styles were designated for 'the activity centeiA n* the western end of the City. < Thes* architectural sty7ss ,"re desicfiiati -d in xespunse to the - character of prominel.t, existing ttructp:res within tlie . activity centers. For ruample, the Bear Gd.ich activity center design is•respective of the Sidamore Inn while. the Thomas Brothers Winery is the style determinant at the Vineyard Avenue activity center. Oriylnally, the Draft Design Supplement was get .up to provide a particular architecturF,- style at the activity centers -, Alliken was proposed au "contemperaiVII-,and 'Rochester was proposed as acla.' al this succ that particular arc hit ectural style for each acti 7itY center -a y t r .,• not ba necessar be aura act vi predominantly vacant., Instead, staff propaBes that the architecture for the activity. 'center intersection be based OE. ;. the folloAng criteria: 1. New proposals sh.:,11 consir;er -:z3 respect thw architectui.a3 stye _ existing i'Lldings. For example, thcs Aggazzotti ,- ,ry, locatted ' At dAie southeast cent -. of Foothx7� and Rochester, is a 'potential Nationa.L Historic Rea °istry candidate. Any proposals for this activity center intersectiun ahor-ld be designee to f_ compatible with, this structure.` This. doe€ not m--an that new br'oposals' must emulate the architectural style of the winery but,, rather, that they must be compatible. 2. There ate no existing buildings located at the Milliken - activity center intersection... J:S a result, the Development Review process -rill establish ,.ne fla,`oi for the area when review.,mg the deve3apmRtnts.: Newtproposals need dot '-duplicate" the architectural style of, previous- submittals but must < be compat_ble in . -terms of,(, architecture and orientation with the'. other corn-Tr (s) a, the intersection. '" j PLANdING COMM3:SSIOt,STAFF REPORT DDA 91 -01 - CM OF RANCHO CLZAMONGA I' dune 12, 199 Page 3 Building "Height and Setbacks Prior to -the Planning Commission ,meeting oY April 24, 1991, staff received comments from repre'sentacives of `atellus Development, the owner of the property on the south side Hof Foothill Boulevard at Milliken Avenue. Onc of the items mentioned in -their letter was a request to allow two - story structures at the activll`,y center setback line. While the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan does not allow two -story buildings at the front setback ?ine (25 feet, from tarb), staff suggests that the Foothill/Milliken intersection may be the appropriate location to create a more urban setting. The extent and location of "q two -story elements shc,1A be based on aeiiew of s,,.cifie p oposals through thl, -, Development Review process. The Design Supplement: has been revised to provide for this request• in adaition to the.. letter from Catellus Development, staff has met with Lewis' Homes to discuss building height and i setbacks. Lewis Homes has expreased i:esarvat onL, about it "forcing" single story buildings uQ to the interse;ation v,lrsus p, °oviding a multi- story building back from the interseC.ison- Staff _suggests that the activity centers are not designed to =•force" buildings up to the corner but, rather, to ^reate a focal point throw: - ",,a combination of building placement, landscape treatment, ,dscape treatment_, str eec fu,-Cniture, etc.. The activity . enter allows single c.ory buildings land two -story bt :ldijg', at Milliken) to be pulled closer to the intersection but also allows multi- story buildings to be set back from the corner provided the activity center /r'ocal point Olement is being achieved through the use of other features. C. Landsc22ing - TIi Design Supplement ericrxcts information from the Foothill Joulevard specific Plan (FBSP) in order to maintain the flaw of the corridor throuah the use of consistent landscape, harasceye, and street furniture treatments at the activity centers. Many of tha issues raised by Lewis Homes in their letter are in keeping with the concept established by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The changes suggested by Lewis Homes will further supplement the plant and hardscape palettes proposed for Foothill Boulevard. In some cases, the addition of the landscape material suggested by Lewis Homes may be necess6,L* -T in order to soften the massing of the building, str.jngtnen pedestrian connections, "provide accent treatments, etc. :t The one issue that has.,not been adequately, - addressed at this time is the street furniture that will ;fie used within tha Foothill corridor. When the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan 'PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' DDA 91 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 1 -2, 1991 . > is ge 4 was approved, the plan depicted aesthetic street furnitur��; that could be consideredr The consultant whp prepared th Foothill Boulevard , Specific Plan suggested: - -that standardized street i°urniture palette be established for the{!{' corridor. This is a'work program item for Advance Planning) ana will be prese;iteA to the Design Review Committee Planning Comm- Ission'at a future date. % `\ III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Plarning Commission review the,grogosed Design Supplement and recommend,,, approval of \ DevelopmentP 'D,istrict. Amendment .91 -01, Foothill Boulev:_�a Specific Plan Amendment 91 -01, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 91-01 Victoria Community Plan i&endment 91 -01, and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 91-04 and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council. Respec submitted Brad ler City Planner BB:SM•mlg Attachments: Exhibit "P_" - Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement Exhibit / "B„ - Letter from Lewis Homes tMay 22, 1991) Planning Commission Staff Report Addendum (April 24, 1991) Planning commission Staff Rfrport (April 24, 1949) Resolution Recommending Approval of DDA 91 -01 Resolution Recommending Approval of FBSPA 91 -01 Resolution Recommending Approval of TVC1)A 91x-01 Resolution Recommending Approval of VCPA Resolution racommending Approval of ISPA 91 -04 NW S' FOOTHiLL BOULEVARD DESIGN SUPPLEMENT Amending the Terra Vlsta,Community Dian, Victoria Community Plan; and Industrial Area Specific Piano 1s 114TRODUCTION F-7 On Septx �iiber 16,1987, the City Council approved the Foathill Boy- .•yard Spedfic Flan (FW). The FBSP was enacted to provide a unified devrxopment scheme for the F)othill Boulevad corridor through the community. Of prime importance to the FBSP are the special strertscape design provisions which "tie" together the viscai as r°:cLs of this comtne'ciai roadway. "Missing Link' Area Victoria Tarry Ivista ` yP� UZ k, Industrial specific plan o ; ui a � a z W W Y � S N � w u O Q Figure I - Missing Link Area The portion of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and the,,hterstate 15 rTmway (1 -15) v.as not a part of the specific plan study, therefore, its provisions diti not aptly to the devdopmen: of this "miss- ing link." At the time of FBSP approval, the City Council and IRanning Cummission expressed a desire to include sig Mcant design pr- visions of the plan in the development of the `adming !ire --This amendment to the Terra Vista ComnunW7 Plan (1VCP), the Victoria Community flan (VCP), and the Industrial .;Aam Specific Plan (1SP) is proposed to include specific streetscape design provisions of the FBSP in the develop- ment of the properties adjacent to Foothill Boulevard. T he following provisionswill apply to ali pmperties bordering Foothill Boulevm,1 within the TVCP, V' and 155P. This amendment augments Obt development regulations and standards of the IVCP, '%'CP, and iSP. When an issm., condition, or situadait ocros %Zilch is not coveree nr provided for in this ammidment o: AML provisions of the TVCP, VCP, or W, the regulations of the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are most applicable to the issue, condition, or situation shall apply. su�rt�rw N age _ EXHIBIT A -2 a 11. COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT The Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement is intended to creates dynamic concourse that;s atzmc- tive and of high gmality with a unifying community design image reflectisre of the community heritage and identit; r, providing an economically viable setting for a balaiuet; — xture of comet —cial ar.d residential uses with safe, efficient circulation aid acress. A. 92 AL Create a community image that expresses and eni ances the unique character and identity of Rancho Cucamonga. S. CI3dECTlIIES• Develop a streetscape uysteau which reinforces the existing suburban parkways as veh cularar,as and designates major strebt intersections as pedestrian activity center nodes L,roughout the condor. Promote compatible building elevations a hich provide a transition at pedestrian areas to taller elevations while protecting adjoining residential conditions. Promote contemporary landscape treatments throughout the corridor, particularly those that are low maintenance, drought tolerant, and wind resistant within intense urban conditions. Provide for the cAnifnstion of vistuAy objectionable views, such i-s outdoor storage and loading areas, through the use of design guidelines. C. POLICIES Develop consistent streetscape and architectural palettes which are sensitive to creating a "haitagm" statement for Foothill Boulevard. Require compliance with corrmmvAty design guidelines inplans for new development and expansirm or redevelopment o:° existing development and make community design a major consideration in site plans review and approval. Utilize landscape materials which a — dean, safe, wind resistant, and relativelylow maintenance. Formal forms and conf9gm nation should be uti.•i.>ed at at, Mty center nodes while less formal configurations should be utilized throughout the parkwayli*:,s between nodes Designate special landscape ar:d architectural features at major interwwtions. Combi-te thematic plantings wi>_h contemporary architectural stateme its designed to promote a distinctive character for the activity centers. Cbanges in paving materials, lighting, signing, and siting of adjacent structures should occur at major intersections to enhance their dishrctivenesa Pig}"" P EXHIMT A, -3 M. DESIGN GUIDELINES-,. A. Mi flME11 MU M& Activity centers are selected intersections along the Foothill Boulevard corridor defined as'Theme" or "Statement" areas which "tie" together the visual aspects of the Foothill roYlevard corridor through the city, promote concentmoed activity at these .:teas, and give identity and theme tc the areas in which they are located. The activity centers are located contiguous to Foothill Boulevard as nidicated in Figure 2. ACTIVITY CENTERS ui ui , ui x W W1 t'7 W E Y an Y W O cc rr mre 2 - Aettvtty Center Lowitions Because three earners of the i- ?even Avenue irtersection are completed, the development provisions of the activity center are Vatted to those streetscape and landscape improvements within the public right -of- way. Therefore, many of the following standards Haply only to de Nfilliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, activity centers: 1. Streetseaps: a. Ml building orientations will relate to the Foothill Boulevard frontage. The building seftck areas x:11 be e niched pedestrAi zones with Tedd hadscape materials, formal landscape arrange - meets, and pedestrian_ level lighting: b. Sheetscape a ancnts such as bollards, czo.-swalks, and street furniture should be unife rm throughout the Foov,%M 3ou'evvard cotriaor. C. The concept within the activity center is io incorporate a fornal,regularly spaced, street tree ;planting system utilizing an informally shaped, colorful tree palede. d. The urban or formal streetscape design characlnis,: of the activity enter should: extend along Foothill Boule mrd;and secondary/intersecting sheets to a point of 14cal transition to the suburban parkway. Typically, the design will extol -kd to at least the first driveway or as modified through the = design review process. The extent of the urban streetscape should be able to adjust to changes in public right- of-way conditions �Paage 3 �y a +rtatra r F-- r3 E?CHi `f]T A-4 _ ; a 2 Site Planning: a. At activity centers, buildings shall be placed at or adl'scent to the front setback line to create a more appealing, active streetscape. Front yard areas of parking lots dominating the streetscene s.^a specifically pn1nibited (Milliken & Rochester). b. Multi-story buildin&. shall be designed to relate to the ped'estriau level. AD ground story facades shall be designed to relate to the tnuman scale. This can be accomplished through the breaking of facades into bays and the signage brought u�;wn in sire and location. Further, this reduction in scale can be established O—iugh the rse of eLmrents which add horizontal articulation to the facades. Examales of these elements include p : estrian arcade., and awnings. (Milliken & Rochester only.) C. Buildings shall be eeesigt -':d to eliminate a fragmented, strip commercial appearance and should be oriented to the activity center (Milliken & Rochester only). d. Architecture and outdoor spaces along Foothill Boulevard shall be integrally designedu and oriented toward the pedestrian exmrimw. the exper?e.^ce should be visually diverse and stimulating and should include activities that create a sense of variety and interest (Milliken & Rochester only). e. dtructures, pathways, and i aidscaping should be incorporated within the site so as to ensure ease of access from site to site in a safe manner. f. Building entrances shall be designed to accommodate logtval pedestrian stress from 0%7 Foothill Boulevard right -of -way. This may include direct entraF m, from Foothill Boulevard, separations in d.,� ouildings that allow access to the interior plaza areas, or oh, er appnDpriate methods. 3. Architectural Concept: a. Within each individual activity c"W, the architectural style should Vr consistent to provide continuity of design at the intersection 9. Milliken Activity Center -There a;e no existing buildings located at ete Milliken activity center intersection. As a result, the Development Reciew process will establish the flavor for the area when reviewing the development proposals New develcpments need not "duplicate" the arciutectival style of previous submittals but must be compatible in terms of archite-eture and, orientation with the other corner(s) of the intersection. 2. Rochester Activity Center- New proposals shall consider and respect the architectural style of existingbuildings. For example, the Aggazzorti Winery at the southeast corner of foothill and Rochester, is a potential National Historic Registry candidate. Any proposals for this activity center should be designed to be compatible with this structure. This does not mean that new pdoposalsmust emu°ate the architectural style of the winery but, rather, that they must be compatible. b. Differentiate the ground floor facades from the second floor in recognition of the differences in the character of activities at the ground floor level. Examples include the use of storchont glass, "step - backs" or "strair- stepped" forms, cornices, change of materials, awnings, and other architectural features facing Foothill 11— devard, Milliken Avenue, and Rochester Avenue. 4. Landscape Concept: The activity centers AM be distinguished from uburban (informal) parkway areas through the use of formal, urban tree plantings. These formal plantings shall border all activity centers and shall define these areas as being higher intensity, urban dis1ricis. The plantings shall consist of an offset double row of Crape Myrtle (Lam rstroemia indiea) trees along each road frontage. Addi- tional plant materiais (evergreen trees, palm,, etc.) army be introduced to supplement the Crape Myrtle as a backdrop. The type and location of the additional material - should be based on the particular buiding design, scale anti setback SUMLS rMMM Page 4 T l� EXHIBIT A -5 - ,ice I1 TOitEi? T�l1' -� � ( ;.SglNlisCgafjrld5 s.:lE >PdZ". �iwM'dJ rskkTYL'ai�s7+Ta 1 i� R/A4t: -fXf'i Y KY,✓ . 1 � , NAT:wl- ;4."X3C` 1,MriN 7DS'C1L;;gPA9+>E - � � R!:2'FnlrreD �i121}hrilfWNlLr/ �� •ChYF1'78 Hnras� :AKK1ve4'KYIr(rA+N � � � _ `r lrfNCNJGt^N6"SX:E f > l:Vy4N4YY'Cf Y! / -4 TeW f ' .. IY...A 44 7.- titiTEb J Pf�1.IPC+S >7kfC ' faU17-wE &!F. N.7.+m a sW+V• ^°..r+tit ±mF- rytxv+J tTzP.'rtgLtlaY'A!!B� !¢' Kfe`?AlIYGp. xF:.ey '�'•€C':k'.: rFYr nyy.. M [,+ r� u. IL u v . A. Figure 3 - Activity Centor i andscdpe Conte Page 5 auau ;V} '. EX"MiT A -6 B. SUBURBAN PARK4!�AYS: I. Streetscape: f` a. The parkways will be designed with infon–al clusters of treas, rolling turf Ferns, and meandering /undulating sidewalks evoking pastoral, suburban qualities. b. Shree:3cape eeanents such aslight standards and street furniture shallbe identical in style and finish to the used in the FBSP area. T r'— t �I /NC.o/AN PNY`�'N6 l.OT LP`fltiN /PODS pBNG/! �yc,N� T- H6tIRN& _416vy77Nb R I OPINP`i'�tri T/'�i10jY DoGY�`O "r r e`r:a �'hjo9ytCd V6 �.' FlCsito 4 - Streetwape Furniture / Material Palette Note: This streetscape furniture/material paler,7- Jepicts the elements to be used along Footer l Boulevard. All furniture that is.,;ronnected to the sidewalk shall'-! connected with shearbolts and not have concrete or other footings. This Matrix applies to all of Foothill Boulevard. It should be noted that these furniture selections are for future directio.., onl; and are not intended to be final selection. The City may want to select other furniture as appropriate and necessary. 3OPP UEeuwa ,t age 6 F"-J-0 EXHIBIT A -7 2. (Architectural Concept: I a. The architectural characteristics shall be governed by the existing standards of the Development Code, TVCP VCP, and ISP. b. In situations where bur Ungs are highly visible from the side streets and /or adjacent parking areas, blank walls shall be prohibited-and special emphasis placed on c-eatingarcWtectura; interest. 3. t andmpe cone;; Tt�k planting will consist a'1 inform -a treatments, &ominated by London Plane (Platanus acelW, ia), Wornia Sycamore (Platanus racemosa,; .and F1Qwering Flom Wrnnus cerasi."era) trees. Other species maybe used to accent and /or supplement those designated tree types. 'The type and location of these species should be reviewed in conjunction with specifie development prop^sais. C. PAR :MANSMQNSL In order to.provide a gradual transition from the urban activity centers to the suburb.. t, informal parkways, "parkway transitions" will be introduced along the corridor. l Parkway transitions are designed to blend the famial hadscape and tree planting pattern of tine activity Ii centers with the informal landscape and hardscape treatment of the suburban parkways. Specifically, the parkway transition is characterized by a 75 foot to 15G footzone, dominated by Flow"sing. Plum hey':'Mer tree species may be introduced o supplement the Howering Plum to assist in creating t sm �oth transltion. i 4-o s- ,-0 Mmory 'orlcwep Troo (Sycaman Figure S - Parkway Transition v -Act ont Tree (Flawering Plum) - Moundod Xurf Q. GEtIERAL GUI12EUNFA: 1. Sitel'1a:�t:ng: a. Buildings shall be sited to create new pedestrian spaces that k;omplement and expand the existing pedestrian right""- -way along Foothill Boulevard. This can be accomplished by creating plaaas and a" g wider sidewalks on the boulevard. Page i su�xEMErnvu �T/ EXHIBIT A -8 b. Buildings shall be designed and plam-'to- Wnimize pedestrian /vehicular conflicts. Driveways and se Ace arms shall be located to avoid inierfering tenth the flow of pedestrian circulation in and around the site. C. All auto related facilitie3 (i e. working bays, storage, etc) chal be oriented /screened away from public view. d. Buildings, including parking structures, should be oriented to place restaurants, services, limited retail uses (as permitted by Gx applicable Community and /or Specific Plan), and other high intensity pedestriai uses on the ground levels of all buildings withnt activity cenhas fr 3nting major sheets.. 2 Parking Lois: a. Whenever possiblea, entries shall belocated on side str`etsin order to miniwd,-k pedes- trian /vehicular convicts. Wlxm this is not possible, the Foothill BoulevaW, site entry shall be designed with appropriately patterned concrete or pavers (behind the publcc right -of -tie y) :o differentiate it from the sidewalks. b. Parking access points, whether lo<ated on Foothill lioulev? ;-cl or side streets, shall be located as far from street intrssections as possible. c. Parking areas shall be designed so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving vehicles and mirimL: nee 2 the d for the pedestrian~ to cross parking aisles. d. hxH vkouai project ai -4dng areas Shall be linked with on -site driveways which are clearly identified and easily r wgni= as L.3nectors. New developmEnt projects shall delineate on all plans where vehicular connections to adjacent properties am' catm.7t a t,pplicant mu-_ also iiem+onstrate provi- sions for access easements for sucl, vehicular movements to tiJjece: it properties consist%,, :with approved .aasler pla-,L& e. As a condition of approval, the ap-, licant may be requr* �d to combine parldrr. fadlities to serve more than oi:e individual project f. Within ; %iburlen parkways, puking areasshall be designed in a manner which link the building to the street sidewalk system as an extension of the pedesulan environmea This can be aceon.- plished by using design .%afire'. such as waikways with enhanced paving, trellis structures, and /or land- snipe treatment~ 3. Landsca g Desigr„ a. All mss, stmt furniture, Eght staisdar4, and similar hardware within iii feet of the public right -of -way shalt bepainted a culor chosen as the FoothiQ Conrodor' Lierrte Coior Sign laces ma- vary and match related architccture. b. Establish a colorful landscape Seat OW base of buildingv. Asphalt edges at the base C zurt ues are prohibited. F'iant materials in containers, are appeolniate. C. .:andscaping should result in a low profile image O.e. use of blade grass in lawn tares, canopy trees in parking areas, hedges and l w walls to screen service areas). suPPLEMEW" Pagy g F /3 EXHIBIT A -9 0701 -02 JANE 12; 1991 P, C. AGENDA 3 Of 7 ) i d. Internal pedestrian circula f ;n, linking office r implexes with neighboring commer- cial or office develsipments, should be located dose to buildings and ( .partially covered. go e. Planting clusters should assume a non- uniform. ar- .ngement. The diversity of massing types should be great enough to provide.interest but kept to a level which evokes a relaxed, natural feeling to the obsum. f. Water conserving plantings and irrigation Nall be used in all landscaped areas. (Refer to City Ordinance No. 411- Xerisca ,�e.) g. Add large (24 -inch to 36-inch box) canopy trees to existing landscaping consistent with City standards. 4. 5treetscape Lighting: a. It is the intent of streetscape lighting to add a consistent, planned look for Foothill Boulevard during day and evening hours. Lighting canhave a dramatic effect on the quality of the streetscape design. b. All lighting fixtures in the public right -of- -way shall be consistent and approved by the City Engineer following recommendations of the Planting Commission. Materials shall be consistent and in keeping with the desired theme. Litudnaries, poles, and suppor! ing hardware shall be c6nsistent. C. All development areas outside the public r -ight -of -way shall use high pressure sodium lighting. All direct light rays shall be confined to the limil of the building site. A. Center Mod Pr09ratn • Based upon trafiicanalyses, a continuous 14 -oot wide raised landscaped median stall be provided on Foothill Boulevard. The median can provide benefits necessary V) acCommodate increased development and traffic demand in the following areas, N Increased vehicular capacity a used vehicular /pedestrian safety t8 Increased vehicular mobility ■ Increased vehicular level of service Median breaks shall occur only at major signalized intersections as determined by the City Engineer. Alternate median breaks may be considered subject to a detailed traffic safely analysis and subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. B. WIG Q22190 - The 14 -foot wide median shall be designed to provide access contrC and a unifying landscape statement. The median will feature two basic types of planting. Accent tree planting (Crape myrfln), underplanted with a low evergreem g.-oundcover, will be provided atmedian :loses. Ever- green trees (Rhus lancea), underplanted with shrubs and woundcover, will be planted throughout the balance of the median. (See Figure 6.) pa F- .3714 SLPFUR "M EXHIBIT A -10 PATHWAY MEDIAN ACCENT TREES (CRAPE MYRTLE) TRIANGULAR SPACING AT i 51 O.C. URB W118" CONCRETE PAVER MAINTENANCE EDGE RHUS LANCER 30' O.C. MAJOR EVERGREEN TP' PARKWAY/MEDIAN ACCEN3 TREE CRAPE MYRTLE MAJOR EVERGREEN MEDIAN TREE (RHUS LANCEA) SHRUBS/ GROUri' COVER 5' -0" CLEAR ZONE 6' CURB W /18" HARDSCAPE . MAINTENANCE EDGE ; a 2' -0" MIN. TREE SETBACK FROM EDGE OF'MAINTENANCE EDGE EQ. ro. SECTION TYPICAL BLOCK LOCATION MA7EXPANSION EDGE CONCRETE PAVERS IN JOINT 295 MORTAR BED / 295 MIN..,,,� CONCRETE CURB r DETAIL SECTION 7_c+ NTS %- i i Figure 6 - Media Design SUMLwo"u Page 10 f- rj 1:57 EXHIBIT A-11 .4 SI E DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Setbacks « (Suburban FsrINU In itaarenthesis) building 51reetsididU -1st Ewr and floor 2 g I Foothill/Ivfilliken Activity Center 0 Foothill 25'(45') V(1 ;) 45' (45' avg, 30' min) ®h iiliken 25'(*) 25` ( T 45' (45' av& 30' min) Foothill/ Rochester Activity Center ® Foothill 25` (451 45'(*) 45' (45' av& 30' min) ' R Rochester 25` ( *) 45' ( *) 45' (45' Eavg, NY min) (1) As measured from ultimate curb face ( ) Refer to rVC , VCP, or 15P for remotions -1:1 sullOig Setback Ratio 10 : f 2nd Story P®rn.ettod at Milliken p'r _ t _ ..o+Mt1. Figure 7 - Activity Center Building Setback i ��xiwu Page 11 ! su F-371 � EXHIBIT A a-12 RMEW Line DaUding - Parkin¢ - in Adjacent to E do 1 or Planned Resideruial 25'(*) is' {) j Development -i N Adjacent to existing nr Planned Commend al ` 0' :( ) F W Develn:�Y:eeaat , JVbnJQr Sjz!� P agedyLine ;1ydidin Y Si y ') N _Adjacenttri xistingor Planned Residential': Development 25' (*) is' { N Adjacent to Ex stLng or Planned'Commerciai Devel�.Pment �. �3si�ht Lisni � l ®PtS � ,t1� ivi antes r ; ` U 1. ithin 45 of street cmbface. Foothill Boulevard (at M iliken) 35 Foothih Boulevard (at Rochester) 20' Milliken Avenue 35' Rochester Avenue 20' i W.Udn lM of single fanuly resia�tu ,district 25' N Other IorukNons 0 Tourers, campaniles, rotundas (� ) (1) Refer to TVCP, VCP, ISP for suburban parkway areas. (' ) Refer to TVCP, VCP, or ISP for regulations Ask suaacyuswFa Page 12 EXHIBIT X-1'2 Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1156 North Mountain Avenue / RO. Box 6701 Upland, Califomit 91785.0670 714)985 -0971 FAX ,.7141949.6760 May 22, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga SAWD ABLSitX P. O. Box 80.7 ON MAY 22, 193 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn: Scott Murphy Ref.: Foothill. Blvd`;S;Secific Plan a Dear Scott: I enclose a compilation of star commcnit» ,,regarding-'the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement. It is ssecahted as, a., propos.,rd "rewrite" of the "Design Guidelines" Seeton of the Supplement. This 1 "rewrite" is_ the product of numerous meetings and discussions with you and Other' members of the 'Planning Department staff. It also incorporates comments from Our consultants. We want to thank the City again for the opportunity to provide this input. Very truly yours. T�Ti7 HO S CORP. Z7 ,7os h . oleson Vic President Senior Project Manager JMO : ksk Enclosure ,6-,Y1Y1& + f - T [ F F; FOOTHILL POP -W— M .AESIP'N SUFP&EMM t1RL' ZRIMTE PROVISIONS) III. DESIGN GUIDELINES A. ACTIVI'A'Y CENTERS: (page 3) Actkt;ity centers are selected locations defined as "Theme$' areas or "statement's areas which give idelitity and theme to the areas in which they are located. These "Theme" or "Statement" areas can be designed as feature landscape areas,' paved plazas (with or without sculpture), .special statemen'; monumentation, ponds or fountains, or other means of creating a strong 'focal j point. ACTIVITY CENTER LOCATIONS (Figure a) No comment. 1. STREBISCAPE: (pages 3 amd 4) a. ,,All building setback areas are to provide an ,,enriched, pedestrian zone with meandering 'walkways' transitioning into a more formal amosph ®,re at the activity centers. ' The planning will also reflect this character and will be used to reinforce the transition between the two areas. Where necessary, secondary lighting at a pedestrian level is to be incorporated to insure night visibility and safety. [NOTE: Delete Figure 3} b. Streetscape elements such as bollards, crosswalks, and street furniture should be uniform throughout the Foothill Blvd. corridor. C. The activity center shall generally follow a- formal evergreen canopy tree planting that also incorporates vertical evergreen trees and flowering deciduous trees as acct -t or focal elements. d. The urban or formal streetscape design characteristic of the activity center should extend along Foothill Blvd. to a point of logical transition to the informal parkway. Typically, the design will extend to at least the first driveway or as modified through the design process. The eattent of the urban streetscape should adjust to changes in public right-of-way conditions. 2. SITE PLAMING: (page 4) a. All buildings along Foothill Blvd. should have a setback as described to allow for open space and a landscape buffer between the structure and the street. Parking is not to dominate the streetscene and should be located to the interior of the site as much as possible, allowing a combination' of architecture and landscaping to act as a buffer. b. (Delete] c. Buildings shall be designed to eliminate a fragmented, strip commercial appearaince`,and should be oriented to the activity center or the. projec.^c of which they are a part, not Foothill Blvd.. d. Architecture and outdoor spaces that occur immediately adjacent to Foothill Blvd. shall�le integrally designed an &_oriented not only to the pedestrian experience but also to the vehicular experience. Foothill- Blvd. is a multi -laned street with a large median island down its center. All architecture and signage should relate to the speed_ of the vehicles using this roadway. e. Whf:rever possible, pathways, structures and landscaping should be incorporated, within the site so as to insure ease of access from site to site in a safe manner, f. Building entrances should be oriented to conform to the:4esign of the project, and not necessarily to,Foothill Blvd. 3. ARCHITE4C'1MULL CONCEM (page 4) a. In an effort to promote a richness of architectural character, a diversity of architectural styles are allowed within the 2 Foothill Boulevard corridor rather than one specific style. Within each individual activity center, the architectural styles should be consistent to provide continuity of design. b. Such a diversity of architectural styles will allow the function of the building (financial, office, commercial, etc.) to dictate tha sty.e Existing buildings or first buildings to site should guide the subsequently proposed architectural styles. Multi -story building may take several forms. The typical slab -sided building with a "Monumental" character must either a setback o`u sufficient depth (40° from face of curb for first 3 floors, and 71 per floor - additional for each floor over 3), or provide a recessed ground floor with a minimum of 60' setback and 50' setback for floors 2 through 10. 1 C. (Delete] d. [Delete] Affik MINE 4. LANDSCAPE CONCEPT: (page S) The activity centers will be distinguished from informal parkway areas through the use of formal, urban tree plantings. These formal plantings will border all Activity centers and will define these areas as points' of intersections and primary pedestrian sits entry. The plantings will consist of a foregru4nd of crape myrtle (Lageretroemia indica) between the activity center and the street. The actual activity center will be defined by formal plantings of evergreen canopy trees. A variety of palm trees may be used as accents in addition to the Lagerstroemia. (NOTE: Delrte Figure 4 and Insert attached Figure � R. INPORMRL PARK -WAY (Suburban Parkways) : (pages 6 and 7) 1. STR$ETSCAPS: (page 6) a. The parkways will be designed with informal clusters of trees, rolling turf berms where 3 ,i� space allcws and meandering /undulating sidewalks. Where space does not allow for berming, shrubbery will be used to visually b- ffer on -site parking. b. Streetscape elements such as light staniards and street furniture shall be consistent in style and finish. All furniture that is connected to the sidewalk shall be connected with shear bolts and not have concrete or other footings. [Note: Delet® Figure 5 - See Terra Vista Landscape Design,Guidelines for Foothill Blvd. Commercial. Sites? 2. SITE PLANNING: (Page 6) a. [Delete] b. [Delete] (NOTE: :,elete Figure 6 j 3. ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPTS: Page 7) No comments. d. LANDSCAPE CONCEPT: (Page 7) The plantings along the infomal parkways will consist of iriormal plan_,Aigs of London Plane trees (Platanus acerifolia). California Sycamores (Platanus racemosa) will be used as focal trees at key areas to continue,.-the original palette. Canary Island Pines (Pins canariensis), Flowering Plum (Prunus cerasifera ,atropurpurea), and Crgpe Myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) will be used as flowering accents at key lucstions along the parkway. C. PARXWAY TMGjT1ON8 t ( Page 7 In order to provide a gradual transition from the urban activity centers to the informal parkways, "parkway transitions" will be introduced along the corridor. Parkway transitions are incorporated to blend the formal hardscape and tree planting pattern of the activity centers with the informal landscape and hardscape treatment of the informal parkway *. Specifically, the transition is characterized I/ a O .,� �Oo to 15o foot zone\ of an informal plar4-1ing of Plowering ropurpurea) and California Sycamoresu(Platanu eracen:osa). [NOTE: Delete Figure 7 and insert attached. Figure 7] D. GSNBRAL GUIDBLIN!S,. (Page 8) 2 SITE PLANNING. Buildings shall be sited with both pedestrian and vehicular circulation in mind. Visibility,, access, and scale in relation to the proximity of buildings to Foothill Blvd. should be three key factors driving the (,'resign. b. Buildings shall be designed and placed to minimize pedestrian / vehicular conflicts. Driveways and service areas .s. -,e to be located to avoid interfering, wit 4t, _pedestrian circulation in and around. fN�``stc. C. All auto related facilities,_ (i.e., working bays, storage, etc.) shrill be oriented /screaned away from public view. 2. PARZING LOT'S: (Page 8) a. [No comment] h. [No comment] U. [No comment] d. [Delete] e. [Delete] f. [too comment] 3. yAmscapN DLBIt#Ns (Page S) ;j a. [Delete] b. The use of colorful plant material is strongly urged throughout the site and around all architecture. Asphalt edges at the base of structures are prohibited. In the case where concrote - occurs at the base of a structure, plant material in containers can be incorporated. C. Landst., %pzng should reflect the scale of the site and the stvacture5 on it. Plant material should be used'to provide an aesthetic quality, soften architectural lines and provide relief from the heat. in those areas such as parking and service areas, plant material is to be ineorporat�td to screen these from public view. d. [Delete] e. Overall planting schemes should be diverse enough to provide interest on the site. At the same time all planting - should help to reinforce circulation and complement the on-site architecture. in areas ( D pedestrian circ l;tion and use, plant material should be used not nl1 \J. y to enhance the space but also provide comp=ort to the user. f. Water .conse -wing plantings and /or irrigation shall be used in all landscaped areas (refer to City ordinance No. 411- Xeriscape). . g. The use of large trees is encouraged on those sites adjacent to Foothill Blvd. to provide not only a statement, bUt'also keep the plant material within scale to the 'cverall street scene and site. 24 inch to 36 inch box size trees are recommendedt Trees as big as 54 inch to:60 inch may be �rfssaxy at key areas, such as entries, to achieve the look desired. The .use of tall material, such as palms, is, also suggested to provide softening of taller structures and material that Jr. within the scale of the site. 1 4. STRZETSCAPR LYGBTINGE (Page 9) No j comments. i I I �p �J u> ��C.p CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 24, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY :. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO FOOTHILL LOOLEVARD DESIGN SUPPLEMENT STAFF REPORT (nTMS L, M, X, Or AND P) Following preparation of the staff report, additional camments were received from a representative of a property owner affected by the incorporation of streetscape and site design standards for the "Missing Link ". The three areas of concern raised in the letter (attached) are aimed at the Milliken activity center, specifically the development of the south side of Foothill Boulevard at Milliken Avenue (Subarea 7 of the Industrial Specific Plan). The three areas mentioned are: 1) modification to permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the 14 subarea; 2) allowance for two - story structures (up to 35 feet in height) at the activity center setback line (25 feet from curb); and 3) provisions for reduced parking setbacks at activity center areas. In assessing the comments, staff provides the following information for Planning Commission consideration: 1. Modifications t�a land uses within the subarea are beyond the scope of the amendments. The amendments are intended to provide consistent design standards for Foothill Boulevard and do not address land use. If the property owner desires revisions to the land use, he should file an application for an Industrial Specific Plan Amendment. It should also be noted that several of the proposed uses are already permitted or conditionally permitted in this subarea. They are identified by "P" or "C ", respectively. 2. The activity centers identified in the Foothill Boulevard specific Plan do not allpw two -story units at the front setback; two -story units must be set back 50 feet from curb. Staff suggests, however, that the Foothill/Milliken intersection may be the appropriate location to create a more urban setting. As a result, the Commission may wish to consider the use of two -story buildings at the front setbacks. This still allows for uses, such as ground floor restaurants or retail, that would promote pedestrian activity. The extent and location of two -story elements should be based on review of specific proposals through the Development Review process; however, the following guidelines would be recommended for inclusion in the Design Supplement: 1 CI _ ADDENDUM TO APRIL 24, 1991 STAFF REPO:A1 •' ITEMS L, M, H, O, F FOOTHILL, BOmwmr.` MISSING LINK April 24, 199 Page 2 III. W'ZIGN ZOIDELIN S _1 A. ACTIVITY CENTERS:, 3. 'Architectural Concept: e. Differentiate the ground floor facades from the second-' floor in recognition of the differences in the character of activities at pedeerrian level. Examples include �'Xe use cf storefront glass, "step- backs", cornices, changes of.material, awnings, and other architectural devices. D. GENERAL GUIDELM9ES 1. Site Planning:, d. Buildings should be orientrA to glace retail stores, restaurants, services, limited retail uses (as permitted by the Industrial, Specific Plan), ar_d_ other high intensity p-destrian uses on the ground levels of all buildings within activity centers - fronting major streets, including parking structures.' 3. Allowing parking areas within the activity 'center to be pulled ci.oser to the street is inconsistent with the intent of the activity center concept. Staff does not feel it is appropriate to reduce the building and parking setbacks within the activity center. Res f ly a , Bra le Cit.1 Planner BB:SM:sp Attachments: Letter from property otiner representatiae REMARKS: COPA TO. RICK DEL (;AFL;,, _ 'I`RT.T ?iS DEVELAPM= CORPORATION /siGNEa: ®. Howard F. Thompson Associates, Inc. - TRANSMITTAL Architecimrland Plannmg'Intenms ` 2240Unwersth 6mv Suite 200 �[}[j i 3 R (i�i 1 W I tienpan Beath. Caloomta 92b6i .. J 17141548.2000'FAS G-141548-252' THE CITY OF RANCHO t,`10 DATE 4-16 91 iQBNO $- 101 -00 10500, CIVIC C!]NIM DRIVE RE, THE 4'EWLH - RANMO CUCANDNGA RANCHO CUCAAWA CA 91729 ATTENTION: W OM KROUTIL WEARETRANSMITTING. TRANSMITTED: _QATTACHED _CHANGEORDER _FOR.APPROMI. _FO,jRE14EWAn'DCOMMENT - �UNDER SEPARATE COVER _PLANS _FORYOURUSE ' _AOTE,NIARKMGS '. VIA _,.SAMPLES _ASREQUESTED _fORCORRECTIONS _.5HOPDRAWNGS _SPECIFi,ATIONS _R"5UBAI17 -CC'IESFORAPPROA•AL _- COPt'OFLET7a _OTHER _SUBXIJT_o COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION _PRINTS __RETGRN _ CORRECTEDPRINTS COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO THE FOMILL DESIGN SUPPLEVOa IMF- UIE CPNIRUM, PAIXW CUCANJMA,, rAI,IFORNIA REMARKS: COPA TO. RICK DEL (;AFL;,, _ 'I`RT.T ?iS DEVELAPM= CORPORATION /siGNEa: Proposed Additions to the Foothill Design Supplement for The Centrnen Rancho Cucamonga, California 1.) Add additional Conditioi.ai uses to the Pedestrian Activity Zone within the Centrum. This is consistent with developing a ruble Pedestrian experience and si pportinS proposed on -site users. PERMIMD USES Permitted.uses vary per location. Sub -Area 7 and Sub -Area ii permitted and conditions • rs are found within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The I� following.. itiq!, ,1 permitted and conditional uses are allowed within the I : Pedest-'-' qty Zone within Sub -Area 7. The Ger rtwt Pedestrian Activity Zone Peimitted Uses., The fo;_towing uses are compatible with the "Business Support Services" category: Delivery Services (i.e. Federal Express Drop -off Centers) Printing and Photocopy Services ,P Personnel Services. Offico,,:SupplY E'. Tmi, :Agency Deli /Bakery P Computer Supplies I Sales j Fitness Centers Beauty /Barber Shcps Florists l tf Photo Labs (i.e. Fotoblate) Shoe Repair Video Store Greeting Card Store Stationary / Mail Service Store (i.e. Mail Box Etc.) As well as similar, but not lis <ed, services at the discretion of the Director of Planning. Iti The Centrum Pedestrian Activity Zone Conditional Uses. Drug Mores (under 10,000 s. %) Dry Cleaner t; As well as similar, but not listed, services at the discretion of the Director of Planning. l i 2.) Revise proposed building setback requirements to reflect the siction below. This is consistent with developing a ;.tore vibrant p % estrl. ^gene. A single story limitation on bringing a structure fol ward to significantly limit the Pedestrian Activity Zone image. A singe s2oty limitation will have a.tendency to evolve into a "strip commerctr> -o!'c A second story acts to keep this in check whc le at the same time allowtngfor a greater spatial variety. Within the Pedestrian Activity Zone, l and-2 story buildings and 1 and 2 story building portions up to 35 feet in height can observe a 25' minimum setback line 3.) Revise proposed parking setback requirements to show a 25' minimum with a 45' average landscape setback. This is consistent with the Industrial Area Spectfac Plan d- -T31 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST"F REPORT DATE: April 24, 1991 TO: Chairman and,Membera of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Plan'^ar BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: NVIR,NMENTAL ASSESSMENW AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AKENDMENNT 91 -01 - CITY OF RANCHC.CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Development Districts,,Map from "OP" (Office Professional) to "FPsp" (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan) for ar. f 8.3 acre parcel located at the northeast corner of 800thill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227- 152 -18 and 30. Staff recommends issuance of a Iegative Ceclaratio,c- ,, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL! BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAT- AriENDMENT 91 -01 •• CYTY OF R. `t ^.80 CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific ,Flat to include the f 3.3 acre parcel at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue within. Subarea 4 and establish standards for development - -APN: '227- 152 -18 and 30. staff recommends issuance of a Negative r Declaration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOY L - A request to establish certain atreetscape and site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Terra Vista Planned Comwrinaty. staff recommends issuance of a Negative Decifiration. ENVIRONMENTAL_ ASSESSMENT ANb VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish certain strescscape and site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Victoria, Planned Community. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A14D INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCXIONGA - A request to establish certain streetscape and site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard specif i, for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the 'Industrial; Area Specific Plan. Staff recommends issuance of a - Negative Declaration..,. - PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DDA 91 -01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 24, 1991 Page 2 i ;}II 1. BACKGROUND: On September 16, 1987, 'tho City.- 'CounCil approved the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (FBSP). Tae FBSP was enacted to provide a unified development scheme for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor through the community. A significant element of this plan is`' the special streetscape design provisions which tie together the visual aspects of this major commercial roadway. The portion of Foothill Boulevard between Deer Creek Channel and the I -15 Freeway was not ;;part of the Saecifio plan study, and therefore, its provision's do nct apply to the development of that "Missing Link" portion of the corridor, At the time of FBSP approval, the Panning Commission and City Council expr3ssed the desire to,apply the streetucape design guidelines of the Plan to the missir;g section. On April,, 27,,• 1988, the Planning Commission reviewed draft regulations for the missing link. At that time, the Commission recommended that the Rochester Avenue /Foothill Boulevard intersection be included as an "Activity Center." This modification has been incorporated into the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement. (see Exhibit. "A"). II. FRAMEWORSt:. The implementation of the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement is proposed as an amendment to the Terra Vista and Victoria Community Plans (TVCP and VCP, respectively),, the Industrial Specific Plan (ISP), the Development District Map (DDA), and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (FBSP). The TVCP, VCP, and ISP amendments will create an addendum to the existing design guidelines and development standards for each r--an, The DDA and FBSP amendments will uemove the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and .Foothill Boulevard from the General City zoning designation of,'10OP" (Office - Professional) and will include it within -Subarea -4 el c the FESP within an "o f e" designation. Th - amendments to the .respective plans, as proposed, will not al'aer the uses that ai;e permitted or conditionally permitted under the current regt+latipns. Rather, the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement contaias,'�the,.,deeign standards that staff believes are essential in maintaining the flow and character of Foothill Boulevard through ;;the City. A brief summary, of the design supplement is as foLlows: III. ACTIVITY CENTERS: Activity centers are points of interest located at major intersections along the Foothill corridor. They are to provide individual, by concentrating commercial and other activities at specified key,-.l cations. These activity centers are generally more urban in natavc'than the rest of the boulevard with buildings closer to the strest and a greater emphasis on building design. The current FBSP calla for these "activity centers" to be located at the following locations: 1! PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF PI' -'`RT DDA 91 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO &cAMONGA April 24, 1991 Page 3 * Foothill at Bear Gulch * Foothill at Vineyard Avenue * Foothill at Archibald Avenue * Foothill at Rtiwanda Avenue The proposed "missing link" amendments would add activity centers in the following locations: Foothill at Milliken Avenue * Foothill at Rochester Avenue Foothill at Haven Avenue. These activity centers are proposed to be developed consistent with the FBSP regulations. The !'iitivty ,centers provide for a pedestrian scale for all buildings while allowing mid -rise development ae, -a backftop. The main difference in the activity centers will be the architectural style proposed- A. Foothill at Milliken - The Milliken intersection considers contemporary architectural style as is presently demonstrated'- on the south side of Foothill Boulevard. Elements anticipated to be used include, but-are not limited to, flat roof tops, smooth and uniform wall surfaces, and: large expanses of glass. B. Foothill at Rochester - The architectural style proposed at the Rochester, intersection will be eclectic in nature utilizing such elements as low, long buildings, covered porches, stucco /plaster walls, arches, and clay tile roofs. C. Foothill at Haven - Because of its prominen.e in the "heart" of the City, the Foothill /Haven inte•.section is deserving of An activity center desir�amt �, However, because three of the four corners a;ce developed, the activity center improvements will bur `1��oiter? -cio the area within the public right -of -way. Theo' application will permit the intersection to exhibit -; onsic fent features of the FBSP including enriched street paving, enriched sidewalk treatment, and special street furniture. The new buildings will be set back from the street as has been done with the developed corners and as is identified in the applicable community or specific plan. IV. SUBURBAN_PARItwAY -- The properties located outside of the Activity Centers will follow th) FBSP ouburban parkway standards. These areas link the activity centers with a iess formal streetscape design to include meandering /undulating sidewalks and informal landscaping. Buildings in these areas have deeper setbacks and are often separated from the street by landscaped parking areas. AML PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DDA 91 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 24, 1991 Page 4 ' Aft The suburban parkway standards evolved through similar design concepts created for the TVCP, VCP, and ISP, thereby ensuring continuity along Foothill Boulevard. V. PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSE: Prior to scheduling this item for public hearing, staff distributed copies of a "draft" design supplement to several of the affected property owners along Foothill Boulevard. Staff has received comments from one of the land owners, Lewis Homes, expressing their (concerns about - implementation of the guidelines (see Exhibit "B "). After having reviewed the various comments, staff believes that the two main differences between the design supplement and the Lewis Homes' direction center around . the architecture proposed and the concer-- '.. of "activity centers.' While the Commission may wish to discuss the type of architecture that should be provided at each activity center, staff feels it is important to maintain a consistent theme at the intersection or "node. "' Staff feels that there is sufficient flexibility in the architectural guidelines to allow developers to adapt/respond to changes in market conditions, In addition, staff suggests that the creation of these activity centers will provide developers with more flexibility in site planning by allowing buildings to be pulled closer to the street freeing up aress internal 1:o the site. Activity centers will "tie" the visual aspects of Foothill Boulevard together from one end of the C£ty to the other through the repetition of;'landscaps, hardscape, street furniture, and . building setbacks., Also, the centers serve as focal points to draw pedestrians who may then venture into a. particular project through connections to plazas, pathways, buildings, or other features. VI. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: In reviewing the environmental issues connected with the proposed planned 'community and specific plan amendments, staff notes that the amendments will provide design standards to tie together the Foothill Boulevard corridor. There are no changes being proposed to the land uses that are different from those currently permitted. In that these 'uses were previously addressed in the Environmental Impact Reports prepared for the respective community or specific plans,' staff has determined that the amendments will not have a significant effect on the environment. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a Negative Declaration. VII. FACTS FOR FINDINGS. The _amendments will provide for the development of comprehensively planned urban communities that are superior to the development otherwise allowable under alternative regulations. The amendments will provide for development of the planned communities and specific plans in a manner which is consistent with the General Plan and which- relates to element and r, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DDA 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 24, 1991 Page 5 ti Aak growth management policies of the City. :The amendments will provide for the construction, improvement, and extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required within the planned communities. In addition,`'the amendments will not be detrimental to the public health or safety or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. VIII- COMSPONDE�NCEz ThE3e items have been advertised as a public hearing in the inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet bf the Development District and Foothill Boulevard Spec'1Zic Plan Amendment boundaries. IX. RECOMMENDI.TION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review thy, propas4d design supple ment and recommend approval of Development` District Amendment 91 -01, Foothill Boulevard Specific r-ld. "Amendment 91 -01, "Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 91 -01; Victoria Community Plan Amendment 91 -01, and Industrial- Area Specific Plan Amendment 91 -04 and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council.' Re'pe u y sub ted, Bra City Tanner BB•SM:mig Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement Exhibit "B" - Letter from Lewis Homes (Dated April 3, 1991) Resolution Recommending Approval of DDA 91 -01 Resolution Recommending Approval of FBSPA 91 -F•9 �\ Resolution Recommending Approval of TVCPA 91 -vi \ Resolution Recommending Approval of VCPA 91 -01 \` Resolution Recommending Approval of ISYA. 91 -04 Amok P Lewis homes Management Corp. I1S6 North Mountain Avenue I P.O. Box 6701 Upland, California 91785 714/985 -0971 FAX: 7141981 -9799 April 3, 1991 Mr. Scott Murphy Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RR= Proposed Foothill Specific Plani� Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Scott: Thank you for sending me a draft copy of the proposed Foothill Specific Plan, covering Rancho Cucamonga's "Missing Link" area between Haven Avenue and Rochester. After reviewing your material internally I would like to offer the following coutments. We believe that Terra Vista should remain excluded from the Foothill Specific Plan and see no reason to amend;; the existing Terra vista Community Plan. Instead, wJ think tl., t both Lewis Homes and the City of Rancho Cucamonga would be better served if we worked together to expand on the existing 01Terra Vista Landscape Design Guidelinest7. These guidelines were submitted for staff review in November of 1990. They could be expanded to include architectural guidelines assuring a consistency in site and building design, as well as landscape design along our portion of Footh Boulevard. We believe that such separate design guidelines would be the appropriate vehicle to accomplish your goals. The draft plan which you sent appears to be overly restrictive in its seemingly arbitrary choice of plant materials and !imitation of streetscape architectural styles. The enclosed copy of the "Terra Vista Landscape Design Guidelines" represents our attempt to respond to the need for a consistent approach to landscape design along our portion of Foothill Boulevard. We believe this will be of help in standardizing the landscape concepts along all of the Foothill corridor, and feel that expansion of this document to cover site and building design is the solution which should be employed to unify this frontage. Mr. Scott Murphy April 2, 1991 Page Two �_":: Lz�'wa are all aware, successful commercial development is market driven. As a result we need the ability to rsspond to the needs of major tenants, whether office or retail, nii thus can not limit ourselves to any one architectural style thatl;tould conceivably put us (and the City) at a competitive disadvantkage. We do recognize th"t a lack of controls can yield a chaotic s1rnet- scale, and for that reason we work within the design intent 6k the current Terra Vista Community Plan, a plan which we have 'jointly developed with the Planning Commission and staff, so as to develop projects which we can all be proud of. our design goal will always be to stress timeless design themes., 'in that context we have the following preliminary observations; 1. Activity centers are fine-but siiould occur naturally and not be forced. if Foothill Boulevard is not predominantly pedestrian, who will use the "Activity Centers "? Foothill is simply too wide and too "highway- like" to attract intimate, pedestrian activity. Pedestrians are not going to sit outside in the loot sun on the north aside of Foothill (which faces into the sun; . 2. Building orientation needs to be multi-sided, not only addressing Foothill frontage. Buildings should vary in size, both width sand height. some buildings should relate to the pedestrian by stepping back while others should not step back, in order to give a sense of scale. 3. Buildings should be separated by open spaces containing parking areas which give a visual depth to the street scene. 4. The reputation and track record of the Lewis Companies (as evidenced by numerous award- winning designs) support our conclusion that architectural styles should be left to the Develogar and his design team, working in conjunction with the Design Review Committee. Unifying elements, such as floor height, color,, landscape, material selection and scale, will provide the boulevard experience. �T3�' Xr, Scott Murphy April 2, 1991 Page Three We should work closely together to balance the needs of the community with the economic realities of the development, business. If we work as a team I believe that we can stre,.mline the development process and work within the design review process as professionals ofi--�ing creative solutions to the City's overall criteria within the context of the existing Terra Vista Community Plan. E Please;` let me know when we can get together to discuss these issuesr. Sincerely yours, M c ael L Jos ph oleson Commercia ivi on Vi a President J Sr. Project Manager Project Manager.( N1i,L: cs Enclosure cc: Ralph Lewis, Don Thompson, Rick Mager, Stan Bell, Joe Manisco Brad Buller - City Planner Rancho Cucamonga, CA i II` I f is DESIGN MANUAL FOR: TERRA VISTA FOOTHILL BOUIZVARI) COMMERCIAL SITES I Lawns domes SOLYTHERN CALIFORNIA - LAND CoNc N, LTD. .! TABLE OF CONT.� FNTS„_ C1' SECTION PAGE I. DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURE 1 A. PRE DESIGN ZvIEEMIG� B. PRELDGMARY LANDSCAPE DESIGN PHASE I. CONCEPTUAL SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST C. WORKING DRAWINGS 1. SUBMITTAL GUIDELINES,--*--- D. APPROVED WORKING DRAWINGS II. LANDSCAPE"IDESGN GUIDELINES 7 A» DESIGN CHARACYER ter_ B. PLANT SIZR AND DDESIGN C SITE ENTRIES D. INTEGRATION WIM ARCHITECTURE E. SErM LIGMIN'G F. PLANT PALETTE 0. SITE FURNISHINGS III. S'T'ANDARD LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS 24 1 I. DESIGN REVIEW THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBES THE STEPS L& THE DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS FOYZ THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES ALONG FOOTHILL BLVD. IN TERRA VISTA. ALL SUBMISSIONS SHOULD BE DELIVERED TO TOM DELLAQUILA LEW& HOMES 1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. P.O. BOX 670 UPLAND, CA. 91786 STRP A- PRIOR TO ANY CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN, THE DEVELOPER AND THEIR LANDSCAP EE ARCHITECT MUST MEET WITH LEWIS HOLIES. THE PURPOSE OF THIS :v1EETING.IS TO BECOME ACQUAINTED WITH THE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND THE PROCESS THAT WILL BE FOLLOWED. THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF TIsE,I)EVELOPER AND THEIR LANDSCAPE AB ° ^HITECT WILL ALSO BE REVIEWED AT THIS TIME. STER B - PRELIMINARY LA7NDSCAI!E RESI!CjN HASH PURPOSE: TO DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN D2;PICTING THE SITE ORGANIZATION, BUILDING SIZE AND TYPE, PARKING LOCATION, ACCESS POINTS, CIRCULATION' AND GENERAL GRADING CONSTRAINTS. TO CONFIRM THAT PRO)" OSED USES AND SITE ARE COMPATIBLE AND DESI'ON FOLLOWS GENERAL GUIDELINES. A PRELIMINARY r LANDSCAPE PLA-11 SHALL BE SUBMITTED,; TO LEWIS HOMES FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL: t 2 CONCEPTUAL. SUBMITTAL CHEC %LIST REQUESTED. MATERIALS: THE FOLLOWINGNIATBRIALS ARE TO BE SUB' &TFED TO LEWIS HOMES' COMMERCIAL DIVISIOIV PROJECT MANAGER 2 PLEASE SUBMIT BL�JELINE f&- EE�OFEACH. ;y 1. PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AT 1 " =20' SCALE FOR.REFERENCE ONLY r A. BUI LDI ING FOOTPRINT WITH DI MENSI ONS TO PROPERTY,,LINE B. PARKING LOT CONFIGURATION, NUMBER OF SPACES, CRITICAL D" MENSI ON'S C. WALKWAYS D. ACCESS DRIVE L. SITE PLAN I 2. GRADING PLAN, INCLUDING ELEVATIONS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. 3. LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN, INCLUDING PLANT PALETTE THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAII',:-YNG AND INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING WITH THE SUBMITTAL. I 4. GRADING PLANS FROM MADOLE & ASSOCIATES FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE 5. BUILDING FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS OF 3 EXTEP_. , - MATERIALS FROM THE SITE ARCHITECT. Np AL1. PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. A SECOND CONCEPTUAL PLAN MAY BE REQUESTED IF THE SUBMITTAL DOSE NOT MEET THE SPEC"PIED CRITERIA. IF THE APPLICANT WISHES, A MEETING MAY BE SCHEDULED WITH LEWIS HOMES TO DISCUSS ANY COMMENTS MADE; DURING THE REVIEW P ROCES 5 UPON APPROVAL OF THE CONCEPTUAL DE 1 GN, A LETTER WILL BE ISSUED BY LEWIS HOME", CONFIRMING THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET AND APPROVED. THIS LETTER MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF FINAL WORDING DRAWINGS. qp A ONCE THE APPROVAL LETTER HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM LEWIS BIOMES FOR THE CONCEPTUAL DESION PHASE, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY COMMENCE WITH FINAL WORKING DRAWINGS. THE WORKING DRAWING PACKAGE MUST BE PREPARED AT A MINIMUM OF I" = 20' -0" SCALE BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LICENSED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DRAWINGS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO LEWIS HOMES FIRST FOR A REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE SUBMITTING THEM TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR PLAN CHECK. ALL PLANS MUST BE STAMPED APPROVED AND SIGNED BY LEWIS HOP'7" PRIOR TO CITY SUBMITTAL, THE CITY WILL NOT REVIEW ANY PLANS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN STAMPED AND SIGNED. THE SUBMITTAL MUST INCLUDE 2 BLUELINE COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING: /- 3-/7/ 4 I. SITE PLAN 2. PRECISE GRADING PLAN INCLUDING DRAINAGE 3. LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH IRRIGATION j 4. HARDSCAPE, SITE LIGHTING & FURNISHINGS. IF DURING THE CITY PLAN CHECK PROCESS, REVISIONS ARE MADE TO THE DRAWINGS PER THEIR REQUEST, THE APPLICANT MUST PkO +VIDE LEWIS HOMES WITH A COPY OF THE REQUEST. THIS Sf!0ULD BE DONE BY PROVIDING .A XEROX ON BOND OF ANY MARKED UP PLANS OR LETTERS. SUBMITTAL GUIDELINES 1. SUBMISSIONS SHOULD INCLUDE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) COPIES, EXCEPT FOR WORKING DRAWINGS WHICH SHALL BE TWO (2). PLANS MUST BE ROLLED. 2. INCLUDE LOT/ PARCEL AND TRACT/ PARCEL MAP NUMBERS ON ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW 3. ANY SUBMITTALS NOT COMPLETE AS TO REQU,.RED N. MBER OF COPIES OR INFORMATION SHA:. L BE DEEMED NOT SUBMI'T'TED. 4. IN THE EVENT LEWIS HOMES FAILS EITHER TO APPROVE OR TO DISAPPROVE SUBMITTED PLANS WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS AFTER SUBMITTAL, IT SHALL BE PRESUMED THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN APPROVED. 5. IN THE EVENT PLANS SUBMITTED TO LEWIS HOMES FOR APPROVAL ARE DISAPPROVED, THE APPLICANT MAY APPEAL IN WRITING OR REQUEST .A MEETING WITH THE PROJECT MANAGER IN COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AT LEWIS HOMES. THE WRITTEN REQUEST MUST BE RECEIVED NOT MORE THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS FOLLOWING THE FINAL DECISION.IF REQUESTED, A MEETING WILL BE HELD WITH THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBERS AT ' LEWIS MONIES TO DISCUSS THE PLANS. 5. SUBMISSION OF A MASTER PLATT IS REQUIRED WHEN DEVELOPMENT WILL OCCUR IN STAGES. THE MASTER PLAN MUST BE APPROVER BY LEWIS HOMES BEFORE THE,;^.ONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN IS SUBMITTED. LEWIS HOMES ? ,r,,SERV ES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE A MINIMUM' SIZL- `FIRST PHASE IN KEEPING `rYITH 1VYARKETING•AND PROJECT IMAGE GOALS. S'L'IEP P BOOED NQ djjjMC� DRAWIAI'G_S_ PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE RECORD OF FINAL CITY APPROVED WORKING DRAWINGS FOR LEWIS HOMES' RECORD/ Cf)NFI:RMATI ON.. THESE SHOULD BE PROVIDED AS SOON AS BUILDING PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED. PLANTS MUST BE XEROk "ON BOND OF CITY APPROVED AND STAMPED BLTELINE PRINTS. j FOOTHILL BLVD. PARKWAY SECTION 7 H. LANDSCAPE DESIGN QUIDELINES LANDSCAPE DESIGNS SHOULD HELP TO REINFORCE BOTH THE ARCIrITECTURAL STYLE AND MASS ALONG WITH THE PLANTING SCHEME FOR FOOTHILL BLVD, FOOTHILL BLVD. IS CiARACTERIZED THROUGHOUT THE CITY BY SYCAMORE TREES BOTH PLATANUS RACEMOSA AND PLANTANUS- ACERIFOLIA. WITHIN( THE COMMUNITY OF TERRA VISTA, PINUS CANARIENSI S HAS BEEN INTRODUCED ALONG FOO'T'HILL BLVD. TO HELP REINFORCE AND SOFTEN THE SITE AND ITS' 'AMENITIES DURING THE WINTER MONTHS. THE RATIO OF 50:50 HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED ALONG THIS FRONTTAGE. FOOTHILL BLVD. PARKWAY SECTION D THE CLIMATE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXPERIENCES. THE EXTREMES THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. IT IS REQUIRED THAT THE PLANT PALETTE BE USED THAT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR THE COMMUNITY. COLORS THROUGH T'E USE OF DECIDUOUS AND FLOWERING PLANT MATERIAL SHOULD BE USED TO CREATE VISUAL EXCITFMENT AND SEASONAL CHANGE. FOLIAGE, COLORS, A3v1) TEXTURES ALONG WITH ULTIMATE SIZE NEED TO BE CONSIDERED TO INSURE A SUCCESSFUL SITE DESIGN. WITH THE EVER INCREASING CONCERNS OF WATER MANAGEMENT IN THE LANDSCAPE, DROU THT TOLERANT PLANT MATERIAL USAGE IS ENCOURAGER; THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HAS ADOPTED A XERISCAPE ORDINANCE THAT DEALS WITH THE ASPECT OF WATER CONSERVATION IN LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION. IT IS REQUIRED THAT A COPY OF THIS GUIDEBOOK IS OITAINED FROM THE CITY AND REVIEWED PRIOR TO ANY CONCEPTUAL DESI GNS. B. PLOT SIZE AND DESIGN PALM TREE VARIETIES CAN BE USED AS ACCENT PLAN'T'S AS WELL AS VERTICAL IDENTIFICATION FOR THE SITE PALMS AS ACCENTS F--1�' 8 9 SITES IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT O FOOTHILL BLVD, MUST CONTINUE THE ESTABLISHED PLANT CHARACTER. ALL TREE PLANTING MIXES SHOULD CONTAIN A -10% DECIDUOUS 90% EVERGREEN SPECIES TO PROVIDE i BOTH SEASONAL CHANGE, AS WELL AS, -TO INCORPOPATE THE SOLAR ASPECTS OF h "ANTING DESIGN. ALL SHRUBS MUST BE EVERGREEN. v� CANOPY GROVE INPARKN( ' OT PARKING LOT PLANTINGS ARE TO INCLUDE A DES" W AND SPECIES TYPE WHICH CREATE A CANOPY GRO, AFFECT OVER PARKING AREAS. MINIMUM 15% OF PARKING AREAS SHALL BE DEDICATED TO LANDSCAPE. PLANTERS MUST BE A BOUNDARY TO PARKING ON THREE (3) SIDES.' THERE IS TO BE A MINIMUM 7' WIDE PLANTING AREA BETWEEN BUILDING AND PARKING. PARKING LOT TREES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY FOUR (4) PARKING STALLS WITHIN THE PARKING LOT LIMIT (TREES WITHIN 10' OF PARKING AREA) THERE SHALL BE NO MORE THAN TEN Ell (10) CONTINUOUS PARKING STALLS WITHOUT BEING INTERRUPTED BY A FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE MINIMUM PLANTING ISLAND CONTAINING A TREE. ALL TREEF' ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 15 GAL. WITH TREES AT THE END OF A BANK OF STALLS BEING A MINIMUM OF 24" BOX. MINIMUM IIVIUM 24" BOX AT END OF BANK 1-t 4-0 MINIMUM 5' WIDE PLANTER MDRMUM 15 GAL. TREES ON- SITE ACCENT TREES AT SITE ENTRY SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 48" BOX. ON -SITE ACCENT TREES AT BUILDING ENTRIES SHALL BE PLANTED AT A MINIMUM S1Z. OF 36" BOX. ALL PALMS ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 8' BROWN TRUNK IN SIZE. ALL PLANT MATERIAL. THROUGHOUT- x-AE SITE IS TO BE PLANTED AS FOLLOWS: ALL SHRUBBERY IS TO BE CHOSEN WITH MAINTENANCE AS A CONCERN. SHRUBS THAT HAVE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 10' -12' ARE NOT TO BE PLANTED UNDER A 4' OR HIGH WINDOW, 10 • 11 MINIMUM 5 GAL. SHRUBS SPACED AT 2/ 3 THEIR MAXIMUM SPREAD-ON CENTER ADJACENT TO BUI LDI NG AND THROUGHOUT P ARKING, AND COMMON AREAS. MINIMUM I GAL. SHRUBS SPACED AT 2/ 3 THEIR MAXIMUM SPREAD O�7 CENTER MAY BE USED FOR FOREGROUND MATERf,AL ANia MU.� '(T BE BACKED BY A MINIMUM 5 GAL. SHRUB. `. .MINIMUM 15 GAL. SHRUBS SPACED AT 2/3 THEIR MAXIMUM 3PREAD ON CENTER ARE TO BE US;D AT BUI LDI N, ENTRIES AND KEY FOCA_L,, AREAS. MINIMUM 15 GAL. SHRUBS SPACED AT 213 THEIR MAXIMUM SPREAD ON CENTER ARE TO BE USED AROUND ALL UTILITIES, REQUIRED CLEARANCES MUST BE ADHERED TO. MINIMUM PLANTED HEIGHT, 4 2 "� ALL VINES AND ESPALIERS ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 5 GAL. IN SIZE. MAXIMUM SPREAD 12" O.t'. i ALL PLANTING AREAS ARE TO BE PLANTED WITH GROUND COVER ROOTED CUTTINGS. SPACING IS °1`'? BE APPROPRIATE TO SPREAD AND GROWTH RATE OF " MATERIAL. ALL SLOPES ARE TO BE PLANTED WITH PERMANENT GROUND COVER ROOTED, CUTTINGS FROM FLATS OR CONTAINERS. 30 %a OF THE SLOPE MUST BE PLANTED`'' WITH SHRUBBERY OF A.' MINIMUM SIZE OF 5 GAL. NO TURF SHALL BE PLANTED ON SLOPES OVER 5:1 GRA DI ENT. ALL TURF AREAS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM C;•ROUND COVER AREAS WITH A 6 CONCRETE MOW CURB. 11 2 12 LAYERED MASSINGS OF PLANT MATERIAT ; ALL SPACING OF PLANT MATERIAL IS TO BE BASED UPON GROWTH RATE AND ULTIMATE SPREAD. THE INTENT IS TO PROVIDE MASSES OF PLANTED MATERIAL AND NOT INDIVIDUALLY SCULPTURED SHRUBS. SHRUBBERY IS TO BE PLANTED IN LAYERED MASSED BY INCORPORATING BACKGROUND, MIDDLE GRGUND, AND FOREGROUND PLANTINGS AS WELL AS ACCENT PLANTING. Bi iCKGROUND, MIDDLE AND FOREGROUND PLANTING C. SI'T'E ENTRIES THE BUILDER IS ENCOURAGED TO DEVELOP AN INDIVIDUAL AND DISTINCTIVE ENTRY STATEMENT , Y INCORPORATING COLORFUL SHRUBBERY, GROUND COVER, OR ANNUALS .ALONG WITH ACCENT TREES AND MONUMENTATI ON. A STRONG CONTINUOUS USE OF PLANT MATERIAL SHOULD BE Ji -ED AS A DIRECTIONAL FORCE THROUGH THE SITE. SOME TYPE OF ARRIVAL FEATURE IS TO BE INCORPORATED SUCH AS A WATER FEATURE, ACCENT TREES, SCULPTURE, ETC. AND THE PLANTING SHOULD HELP TO DI RECT ONE TG I T AND REI NFORCE I T. all ter.. •.�� .re. � � .`.1�. h ENTRY STATEMENT PLANT MATERIAL AS DIRECTIONAL FORCE ARRIVAL FEAT V RE PLANT MATERIAL FOR R`,SLVFORCEMENT 13 13 THn USE OF HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS SUCH AS COLORED _. AND OR TEXTURED PAVING AT ENTRIES AND KEY POINTS THROUGHOUT THE SITE IS ENCOURAGED; ALONG WITH LOW WALLS AND WATER FEATURES. 1 14 THE SENSITIVE INTEGRATION OF LANDSCAPE WITH BUILDING MASS IS A Mi'LJOR DESIGN GOAL. CLIMBING FLOWERING VINES, RAISED PLANTERS, POTTED PLANT MATERIAL AND HANGING VINES :SHOULD BE INCORPORATED. COLOR SHOULD BE CHOSEN THAT WILL COMPLIMENT AND A CE_4T THE BUILDINGS' EXTERIOR C y ORS. iN THE CASE OF MULTI -STORY BUILDINGS, TREES SHOULD BE CHOSEN TO HELP SOFTEN THE MASS WHILE COMPLLMENTING THE ARCHITECTURE. ON THE BACK SIDES OF THE BUILDINGS SUCH AS MAJOR DEPT. STORES, ETC. WHERE WINDOWS AND DOORS DON'T OCCUR, %_ 24" BOX VERTICAL* TREES ARE TO DE PLANTED AT 12' O.C. TO SCREEN VIEW. SPECIAL USE AREAS SUCH AS ENTRIES, ARRIVAL FEATURES, AND PEOPLE - GATHERING AREAS SHOULD BE HIGHLIGHTED WITH COLORFUL ACCENT TREES, SHRUBS, AND GROUND COVER PLANTING SHOULD REINFOR( THE USES AND CHARACTER 0 ACTIVE SPACE WITH MORE STRUCTURED AND ARTICULATED DESIGNS. WATER ELEMENTS, TRELLAGE, LOW PLANTER WALLS, . SITE FURNITURE, UPGRADED P AVING MATERIALS, ETC. ARE ALL ENCOURAGED TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THESE SPACES. ti q E. SITE LIGIi PING LIGHTING OF SITE AND STRUCTURES SHOULD BE DESIGNED FOR VISIBILITY, SECURITY, AND „NIGHT USAGE WHERE APPLICABLE. STRUCTURES SHOULD BE- WASHED, WITH A FOCUS ON S I GNA GE FOR IDENTIFICATION. LIGHTING OF TREES IN FOCAL AREAS IS ENCOURAGED FOR BOTH DEFINITION AND DIRECTION. IN AREAS WHERE NIGHT USE IS ANTICIPATE, AREAS SHOULD BE LIT WITH BOTH. ROLLARr AND POLE LIGHTS TO PROVIDE VISIBILI' Y AND SAFETY. ti i LIGHTING FOR NIGHT USE a AS IN ANY DESIGN, IT IS DESIRED THAT THE LIGHTING USED COMAPLLA4FNTS THE SITE AND ITS' STRUCTURES. PARKII`1G LOTS AND PEOPLE AREAS BEING THE MAIN FOCUS OF INTENSITY WITH STRUCTURES AND SIGNAGE WASHED FOR IDENTIFICATION AND ENHANCEMENT. I T I S ENCOURAGED THAT ANY LIGHTING DESIGN IS DONE BY A PROFES6IONAL CONSULTANT AND ' �L CITY ORDINANCES ARE FOLLOWED FOR COMPLIANCE. 16 F. RUNT PAL=. TREES ALBIZIA JULIBRISSIN SILK TREE ARECAS lRUM ROMANZOFFIAI4UM QUEEN PALM BRACHYCIR T'r-N POPULMVI BOTTLE TREE CEDRUS ATLANgCA BLUE ATLAS CEDAR CEDRUS DEODARA CALIFORNIA CHRISTMAS TREE CHORISIA SPEC IOSA FLOSS SILK TREE CINNAUvIOMU_A CAMPhORA CAWHOR TREE CUPANIA ANACARDIOIDES CARROTWlQOD 1- .K0BOTRYA D. COP PIRRTONE COPPERTOI+ E LOQLTAi' GEIJERA AARE'IFLORA AUSTRALIAN WILLOW LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA CRAPE MYRT LE LIGU,STRLM JAPONICUM JAPANESE PRIVET LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA S "EET G�JM T IRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA lifff IP TREE . MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA MAGNOLIA MAJESTIC BEAUTY 'MAJESTIC BEAUTY` MAGNOLIA GRANrIFLORA SAMUEL SOAt&fER MAGNOLIA J 'SAMUEL SOMMER' MAYTENUS ]BOAPIA MAYTEN TREE -MIN. 35" BOX hUIALEUCALEUCADENDRA CAJEPL` lZEE `1 .- d '. . i 17 11V ELALEUCA LINNIFOLIA FLAXLEAF PHOR4IX DACIYLUMM DATE PALM RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC PINUS CANARIEN'SIS CANARY IS?,AND PINE PINUS ELDARICA ELDARICA PINE I PINUS HALEPENSIS .ALEPPO PINE PINUS PINEA ITALIAN STONE PINE PISTACKLA CHINENSIS CHINENSE PISTACHE PTITOSPORLrid PIELL.Y AEOMES WILLOW PI'ITOSPORUM i PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA LONDON Pi ANE TREE PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR FERN PINE PYRUS CAL.L.ERYANA APISTOCRAT ARISTOCRAT PARE SCIMgUS TEREBINTIBFOLIUS BRA2nLIAN PEPPER STRELIT21A NICOLAI GIANT BIRD OF PARADISE. TRACHYCARPUS FORTUNE[ WINDMILL PALM TRISTANIA CONFERTA BRISBANE BOX U? MUS PARVIIFOLIA SE?&ERVIRENS EVERQREENELM WASH NGTONIA ROBUSTA MEXICAN FAN PALM SHRUBS ABELIA SPP. ABELIA AGAPANTHUS AFRICANUS LILY OF THE NILE BUXUS MTCROPKYLLA JAPANESE BOXWOOD COPROSMA BAVERI'VARIEGATA' MIRROR PLANT DIETES ' TGETA FORTNIGHT LILY i DODONAEA VISCOSA HOP SEED Adffihk ELAEAGNUSPUNGENS SILVERBERRY ESCALLONIA; FRADESII ESCALLONIA EUONYMUS .IAPONICA EUONYMUS EUROPS PECTINATUS EURYOPS GREVILLIA NOEULI GREVILLIA HEM EROCALLIS ROSEUS PERIWINXLE HYPERICUM 3PP. ST. JOHN'S WORT JUNIPERUS SPP. JUNIPER LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM LIGUSTRUIvi ti MYOPORUM SPP. MYOPORUM NfYRTUS SPP. MYRTU: NANDINA DOMESTICA HEAVENLY BAfisBOO OSMANTHUS ILICIFOLIUS FALSE HOLLY P HORMIUM TENAX NEW ZEALAND FLAX PHOTINA FRASERI PHOTINIA PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA ;. MOCKORANGE PTITOSPORUM TOBIRA VARIEGATA VARIEGATED PiT I'OSPORUll PI'ITOSPORMITOBIRA. WH,EELERI WHEF .ER "S DWARF PODOCARPUS GRACI IOR YEWPINE PYRACANTHA SPP. PYRACANTHA RAPHIOLEPIS INDICA INDIA HAWTHORNE STREI X171A :EGINAE BIRD OF PARADISE VIBURNUM SPP. VIBURNUM XYLOSMA CONGESTUM XYLOSMA FINES CISSUS ANTARCTICA KANGAROOTREEBINE CLYTOSTOMA CALLISTEGIOIDES VIOLET TRUMPET DISTICTUS BUCCIINTATOLIA RED TRUMPET VINE FICUS REPENS CREEPING FIG GEIS)r-'AgUM SEMPBRVIRENS CAROLINA JESSAIVIINEC PARTHENOCISSUS TRICUSPIDATA BOSTON IVY ROSA BANKSIAE LsDY BANKS' ROSE 19 GROUND COMERS ;ZOTONEASTER SPP. COTONEASTER h GAGA. HYBRID GAZANIA 'MITSUMA YELLOW' I HEDERA IM-IX HAIN.'S IVY HEDERA HELIX NEEDLEPOINT NED jPOINT IVY HYPERICUM CALYCINUM ST. JOHN'S WORT ROSMARINUM OFFICINALIS ROSEMARY MI ACHELO XERMUMJASMINOIDES STAR JASMINE' { ADDITIONAL PLANT SPECIES MAYBE SUBMITTED TO LEWIS HOMES FOR APPROVAL 20 SI'P' EURNISHINGS_ THE FOLLOWING FURNITURE ELEMENTS HAVE- BEEN STANDARDIZED TO ENHANCE A UNIFIED COMMUNITY' 'THEME. THEY SHALL BE USED WITHIN ALL AREAS TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO. LIGHTING AVAILABLE FROM: ARCHITECTURAL AREA LI GHTI NG SUBSIDIARY OF KIDDE INC.. 1424.4 ARTESIA BLVD. LA MIRADA, CA. 90638 • I i i POLE LI GH11 CAT. NO. A,R =206 WITH CUSTOM LOUVERED HEAD BOLLA RD LIGHT CAT. NO. ALR8 _ 22, DRINKIN`O FOUNTAIN \ MODEL NO. FMR8 0 AKA #33 8 0 AVAILABL)--:r,FROM: TF'L WAKEEFIELD COMPANY 1434 BORCHARD AVE. l' SANTA ANA, CA. 92705 - .714- 542 -4255 BIKE RACK ULTRUM MODEL #7700 ..AVAILABLE FROM; ;I MORRE RECtZEATI ON & PARK EQUIPMENT P:O. BOX 3337 THOUSAND OAKS, CA, 91359 i 805- 375 -1324 I E LJ 24 III. STANDARD L1A.NDSCA"R SPECIFICATIONS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ITEMS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN ALL BID SET AND CONSTRUCTION ISSUE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS: A. ADDITIONAL JURISDONAL REQUIREMENTS 1. IN ADDITION TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH PERTINENT` RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN: A. "STANDARD SPECIFI CA,tI ON FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION ", LATEST EDITION BY THE APWA -ASC JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE, (GREEN BOOK) ALL PERTINENT SECTIONS.) B. AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE ON HORTICULTURE IiSTANDARD PLANT NAMES". 2. CONTRACTOP, SHALL STRICTLY ADHERE TO ALL TREE PLANTINC REQIREMENTS WITHIN P UBLI C RI GHT- OF- W A Y OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD DRAWING #601. B. CONTRACTOR'S UPERVIST:_Q THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A QUALIFIED SUPERVISOR WITH COMPETENT COMMUNICATIVE SKILLS ON THE JOB SITE AT .ALL 'TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION THROUGH COMPLETION OF PICKUP 25 C. PFOJECT SITE ACCEPTANCE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY AND ACCEPT ALL GRADING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO START OF LANDSCAPE WORK.._.- CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL GRADING AND~ RAINAGE WITHIN THE LANDS(APE AREAS AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF THESE),, AREAS. ALL FLAT SLABS SHALL HAVE A.IYiN -MUM OF 18 INCHES' OF LEVEL AREA BETWEEN SLAB AND TOP OF SLOPE (GREATER THAN 3:1). &F - -. EINERAL REQUIREMENTS s , R'. Cy, REMOV_AL CONTRACTOR SHALL HAUL AWAY ANY ROCKS GENERATED FROM CONSTRUCTION ON LARGER THAN 1" DIAMETER. NO ROCK - EXCEEDING 1" SHALL BE ALLOWED ON SURFACE OF FINISHED GRADED AREAS. 2. WEED ABATEMENT CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WEED ABATEMENT FOR ALL PLANTIrs AREAS AFTER TOP SOIL IS GRADED BY WATERING TEN (10) DAYS TO STIMULATE WEED GROWTH, SPRAY WITH ONE (1) APPLI C. TI ON OF "ROUND-UP" PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS, THEN INSTALL PLANT MATERIAL. 3, SOIL PREPARATION- TT,L SHRUB & GROUND COVER. AREAS A. THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE UNIFORMLY BROADCAST AND THOROUGHLY INCORPORATED -'TO A MINIMUM 5" D. T`Zf BY MEANS OF ROTOTILLER L ')R EQUAL: AMTJ 1000 SQ,. FEET o b CU. YDS. NITROGEN STABILIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT DERIVED FROM U s m- 26 o 15 LBS_ 12 -12 -12 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER B. REMOVE ALL ROCK MATERIAL AS SP ECI F1 ?ED ELSEWHERE} C. PLANT ALL CONTAINER MATERIAL. D. RAKE OUT ALL SHRUP GROIJ.9D COVER PLANTING AREAS (RETAIN WATERING BASINS AS NEEDED) TO SMOOTH EVE14 GRADIENTS OF THE SPECIFIED GRADE DIFFERENTIALS AT THE EDGE OF THE PAVING. 4. FINISH GRADE: FINISH GRADE OF PLANTING AREAS AFTER APPLICATION OF SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE TWO INCHES :�(2 ");_ _ BELOW TOP OF CONCRETE WALKS AND CURBS IN SHRUB AREAS; AND ONE INCH (I") BELOW IN LAWN AREAS. ALL PLANTING AREAS HALL SLOPE TO DRAIN AT 2% MINIMUM SURFACE GRADIENT. 5. ROOT GUARD BARRIERS: CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL ROOT GUTARD BARRIERS WHERE TREES OCCUR WITHIN 5' -0" OF ANY CONCF' `.rE FLA TW ORK, CURB AND GUTTEk, t rI LI TI ES -, ' STRUCTURES, ETC. UNLESS DIRECTED' OTHERWISE. AVAILABLE FRONT; DEEP ROOT CORPORATION (213) 552 - -3337, (714) 646 - 9505. FOR INSTALLATION SEE APPROPRIATE DETAIL. 6. PRUNING: FINE PRUNE ALL SPECIMEN TREES AFTER PLANTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE LAN! 11CAPE ARCHITECT ONLY. 7. DETAILS: REFER TO THE APPROPRIATE DETAILS THAT ARE A PART OF TV-ESE GUIDELINES. m 27 8 . R&,; ZFI tl -'BA CKFI LL IS AS FOLLOWS: THOROUGHLY BLEND THE FOLLOWING: 6 PARTS BY VOLUME ON -31TE SOIL 4 PARTS BY VOLUME NITROGEN STABILIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT 1 LB. 12-12-12 FERTILIZER PER CFJ. YDS OF MIX 2 LBS. (IRON SULFATE) PER CU. YDS OF MIX AND USE AROUND THE ROOTBALL OF CONTAINER- GROWN TREES AND SHRUBS 9. PLANT TAB LET SCHEDULE 1 GALLON CONTAI NER- RWZFI VES 3 GALLON CONTAINER Ra%EI VES 5 GALLON CONTAINER RECEIVES 7 GALLON CONTAINER RECEIVES 10 GALLON CONTAINER RECEIVES 15 GALLON CONTAINER RECEIVES 20 -24: BOX RECEIVES 30" BOX RECEIVES 36" BOX RECEIVES 42' BOX RECEIVES 48" BOX RECEIVES 60" BOX RECEIVES 2.3 TABLETS 3- 6 'TABLETS 6 -9 TABLETS €. -10 TABLETS 10.12 TABLETS' '12-13 TABLETS 14- 1 6 TP BLETS 16 -18 TABLETS 18 -20 TABZ,ETS. ?9 -22 TABL.STS LP-24 TABLETS 32-26 TABLETS LARGER SIZES - -FOR EACH 1/2" CALIPER 3 -4 TABLETS 10. VINE PLArlING: ALL VINES AND ESPALIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE NURSERY STAKES REMOVED AND VINE RUNNERS ESPALIERED TO THE ADJACENT WALL, FENCE OR PGST WITH 3/8" DI A. X 4'" CADM. PLATED EYE BOLTS. SECURE TO MASONRY WALL WITH MASONRY EXPANDERS. WIRE IS TO BE GALVANIZED STEEL. ALL VINES ARE TO SPREAD TO THEIR MAXIMUM SIZE.: SEE DETAIL. 11. GROUND CQV R PLANTING: ALL GROUND COVER SHALL BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF "' AWAY FROM THE DRIPLINE OF ANY 28 SHRUB PLANTING AND 8 FROM ANY HARDSCAPE FEATURE.. 12. Pk0 REM ENT OF PLANT MATFUALS A. CONTRACTOR SHALL WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) WORKING DA ^,S FOLLOWLNG AWARD OF CONTRACT SUBMIT TO LEWIS HOMES —AND LAt"TDSCAPE ARCHITECT A COMPLETE LIST OF PROPOSED CONTAINER AND FLATTED G- OUND COVER; THEIR BOTANICAL ANE COMMON NAME; EACH REQUIRED QUANTITY AND SIZE THEIR NURSERY LOCATIONS AND NURSERY SALES'Z?ERSON TO CONTACT; THEIR SPECIFhCATIGNS AS TO HEIGHT, SPREAD AND TRUNK CALI P Ek S AT ONE FOOT (1 ' ) AB'-'VF GZtAD,.' (FOR 'TREES). I3. A POLA ROh D, 3 5 is `m REPRESENTATIVE PHOTO OR "SPEC SHEET IS R'SQUIRED FOR EACH TREE AND SHRUB " FO R i REF,° 4 8 " BOX AND LARGER, A P j wTO IS PREFERED. C. ALL PLANT MATERIALS Si.,ALL BE APPROVED (TAGGED) AT TFIE NURSEAY SOURCE BY LEWIS R.'MES OR LANDSCAPE ARCHI TECT P RI OR TO DELI V ERY. E. ESTAIRLI 'H "r NT 1kit IN:EENANC�E 1 . 11A ATNTEN NCE PERLQ : CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW IN HIS BID FOR A SIXTY (6G) DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD. THE PERIOD SHALL BEGIN FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF WORK AND UPON APPROVAL OF WORK BY LEWIS HOMES. ALL PLANT MATERIAL 15 GALLON IN SIZE t ND SMALLER SHALL BE GUARANTEED F 3R A N! NET f DAY (9 0 ) PERIOD*AFTER COMPLETION OF SPECIFIED MAINTENANCE i ERIOD. ALL TREES 24" BOX SIZE AND LARGER SHAL!, BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YP.A.R FOLx.OWING ��T�9 c, WRITTEN FINAL-ACCEPTANCE OF WORK BY LEWIS DOMES. 2, STABLISHMENT MAINTENANCE ERT LIZATION: APPLY 5. LBS,J 16 -6 -8 PER 1,000 SQ. FT. TO ALL TURF AND GROUND' COVER AREAS THREE WEEKS APW,R _. INSTALLATION AND;MHEREAF`I'ER EVERY 30 DAYS DURING MA.IN'ri ANCE PER10". 3. B3. E IMJkjAkY WA ERING SZHED�?� FOR THE LAST 31� DAB'S OF I4A NTERANC , THE, LANDSCAPE CONTPACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A PRET',IMINARY WAIERING:(IRRIG AT! ON) SCHEDULE TO LEW I S HOMES FOIt. "REV I EW . .r t RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLiiTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFJRNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ire DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 91 -01, REQUESTING TO AMEND TLC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM "OP" (OFFICE PRaFESSIOKAL) TO "%3SP- ($OOTHILL BOULEVARD SPFCIFYC PLAN,. FOR A ± 8.3 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT TFS' NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL ROULEVAR') AND ROCHESTER AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 227•- lS2 -18 AND 30. A. Ryeritg "ss+ (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has initiated an applieaton for Development District Amendment No. 91 -01 as dsaerihel in the title of this Resolution. Herei:�xftox in thid Resolution, the subieet Development District Amendment is refersd to as "the application." (ii) on June 12, 1991, the Planning of the City of Rancho Cucamonga rondu=ted a duly n7ticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (£i) All ?eigal prerequisites prior to ti-0. - dogtion of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, 'HEREFORE, it is aereby found, determined, and -:e-solved by the Planning Commission of the City of RP!::ho Cucamonga zs follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds mir.at all of the .facts i set forth in the Recitals, Pa=t A, of this Resolution are =2* and ,correct. 2. Based upon substrnt ai evidence- prevented to,ic.." Commission durixg tts above rc-srer-":d public hearing on June ?12, 1991, 3ncsudinv irritten and oral staff together with public to 3t moray, th ?.s Commi36_?*± „areby specifically finds as follows: (a) The rmendment pertains to a ± 8.3 acre parco'L of land which is located at the northuact corner of Foothill H-ul €yard and P.oc ester Avenue wita a street frontage cf ±900 feet a7 ?n3 Foothill BoulevArc and ±400 fact k alorg Rochestr_r Avenue and is preeet_'._ vacant::. Said parcel 3s curreal.ly i designated as "OP" (Office arofeasionf''j; and (b) Thz props•;ty to the nak "x.£er residential uses end is developed wi' -Ingle family ho6e„ �y to the west is d,signat•d for office commercial uses ano, - property to the so"th is designated for industrial use >3 and is &.e a single family residence. The prtperty to the east its designated t-- .cility and flood control :acilities and is developed wi;:h_ ss:ch; end rlT' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DDA 91 -01 - CIT'.fC OF P -ANCHO CJCA,'';ONGA June J2, 1993 Page 2 (c) This amendment ,floes not conflict with ,the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and wiil provide for development within the district in a menner consistent with ti•e: elan and with related development; and. (d) This amendment will promote tt,�, goals ,aw :cbjectives of the Land Use Element; and (a) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to ';he adjacent properties and would not have a significant £mpaa on the environment nor the sutrosnding properties. f 3. Based upon the substantial evidence pres,nted to this Commissioa during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of ;acts set forth in paragrapas 1 and ;t above, this Commission hereby finds ana concludes as follows: (a) Thrt the subject jsoperty is suituble for the uses pErnittssd in the proposed district in term3 n: acnsaAp sire, and compatibility with existing _and use in the surrounding arena and (b) That the proposed amendment would. ';not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surround ng properties; and (e) That the propooLd m ndment is in conformanve with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hFr,efay finds tl�st the proje ', has been reviewed and considered in conpl£ance with the California Eavircnmental Quality Act os 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings rnd conclusi %,nss ' forth in paragraphs 2, 2, :, And 4 above, this Com isai! - _..areby reE,,c`vea that pus -suant to Section 55850 to 65855 of the Califntaia >___arnment Ocida, that the Plenning Come, .',ion of the (City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ree--omends approval on the 12th days -f ;June 1991 of Development District Amendment No. 91 -01. 6. The Secrate y to thin commission shall ceztify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOP7XD THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION O.§` TAE CITY OF RANL -EO COCkMnmq.A BY: Larry-;- McNiel AML F-' �' el I n, PLANNING COMMISSION iZSOfs$TION NO. DAA 91 -0'i - d TY OF " -RA ';HO CUCAMONGca June 12,.1391 ; 1 Page 3 . S i ATTES7 Brad Buller, Secretary.. i S, Brt Bu14er, Secretary, of the planning Comriission of the City of Rancho } Cucamonga, Ida hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regy'larly introduced " and adopted, by the Planning Cammission -f the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hell on the 12th day of June 1991, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: ca idMISSIOHERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSEAT: COXHISS;)NERS: l r, RESOLUTION NO. A RFSOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 170. 91 -01, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE FOOTHILL SOULWARD SPECIFIC PLAN TO INCLUDE THE 't 8.3 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED PT THE NORTHEAST' CORNER OF FOOZI -,LL BOULEVARD AND ROCF.SSTER AVENUE WITHIN SUBAREA 4 AND ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT, AND bU -KING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227- 152 -18 AND 30. A. Recitals. (i) The 'City of Rancho Cucamonga has initiated an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 91 -01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevsicd Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) on June 12, 1991, the Planning commission of the City of Ranch? Cucamonga co^ ducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded ;said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior ;;o the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detL-- mined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1, This Commission hereby specifically ff.nds that all of the facts eat forth in the Recitals, P^Vt A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substaitial evidence presented to this coem`.saion during the above - referenced public: hearing on June 12, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony,' this Commission hereby specifically finds as Follows: (a) The amendment pertains to a f 8.5 acre parcel of land which is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue with a street frontage of 1900 feet along Foothill Boulevard and 1400 feet along Rochester Avenue and is p.Tosently vacant. Said parcel is currently designated as "OP" (Offica Profeavional); and (b) The property to the north is designated for residential uses and is developed with single family Homes. The property to the west is designated for office and commercial us&s and is vacant. Tha property to tho south is designated for irriuctrial uses and is developed with a single family residence. The property to fiche east is designated :or utilit-. and flood control facilities and is developed with such; and -..�7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. FSSPA 91 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 12, 1991 Page 2 (a) Thie amendment will incorporate the t 8.3 acre parcel lc.ated at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Atenue into Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan as an Activity Center; and (d) Thar, amendment will maintain the same uses,tLat are currently permitted or conditionally '�+i,�rmitted. under ,As "OP" designation of the Devel( - a,t Code; and (e) Thin amendment will *die" tar 7ethar the -iaual aspects of Foothill Boulevard as a major commercial corridor through the implementation of streetscape and mite design standards' contained within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan: 3. 3ased upon the substantial evilence presented to this Commission during the, a,:�ve- re£e.lenced, pmblic hearing rind up-)n the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this. Commission hereby finds and con.ludea as follows.;, (a) Ti, »t the amendment will provide for development of a corLirehensivaly planned urban community within the district that is superior . to thL development otherwise allowable under altesnat_ regulations; and (b) That the amendment will provide for development within the district in a manner corlsistent with the Cenaral Plan and with related development and growth mansgement poiiciec of tht -City; and (c) That the amendment will provide for the uonnLXUction, improvement, or extension of tre.aeportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development within the district. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviemod and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recoraends issuance of a Negative Declarati -,i. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 21 3, any. 4 above, 1-,his Commission hereby rnsotvds �a follow -%* (a) The Planning Commission hereby recommenc:_ that the City Council approve and adopt Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan lmend.;ent No. 91 -01, as attached in Exhibit °A." (b) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution ,gnd related mcterial hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be foi,varded to the city Council. S. The Secretary to this Commission shall cer+-- fy to thr. adapti.oA of this Resolution. - ; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PBSPA 91 -01 - CITY Ok PAN CHO CUCAMONGA June 12, 1991 Page 3 APPROV"U AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C'iiCMIONGA BY: Larry T. MoNiel, Chairman ATTEST:.:. Brad- Ou:ler, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the. - ,Planning Commission 6t,' the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do' hereby certify that the foregoimq Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the' Planting ' xaaiesion of true City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Vagular meeting of the Planning Commias a he':,d .' on the 12th slay of June 1991, by the fol ?14wing vats -to -.Wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONER$: ABSENT- COMMISSIONERS: i i ll °' ul u. N I /KgYas rM1Rdiy,7 .t70r/s?pyi ( l ( J• IL " l — fl 1 cog �Q AlMlk ip c ;w -'MqWAeOW i ;,:� `— �faaauyaaueaeauarausaaaaar+aD i M •.?( s 1TJ ae� y y� � r7 4 EXH1131T A-1 SUMMARY. TABLE OF AF.RMITTGt) +..> -.� (X) AND CO+'nrr.O.•. r t t' PERMI'T'TED lot UL-FS RETAIL O Subarea One SubareL'TVo Subarea Three Subarea Four 1tCIAL USES -CCC O MR P SC r(�Yl ntrt_ $ O LUR MR TFKATT RR� titR t T 0 Antique Sons X X X X _ Apparel: a) Boutiques X X X X X X X X X b) General X X X X X X X X �.` tlaoliance Stores and Repair X X X X X Art, Music, and Photographic " St nd %q_ly Stores X X X X X x X X X X 1r0 Auto Service Sta %iPn- O 0 O O O O O O _0 Auto Service (includira motorcycles, boats, trailers, campers): a) Sales (with ancillary :epeir facilities) O 0 0 0 0 b) Rentals 0 0 O O 0 c) honor Repair (does not include major engine work, muffler shops, painting, body work, upholstery, etc.) O 0 0 O O d) Coin -op Washing 0 O 0 e) Automatic Washing Q Parts and Sunpiies X G X O X X 0 ' liakeries (retail nnly) X X X y X X X_ x X X. Barber . %,,.Beauty Shnns _ Bed and Bteakiast Bicycle Shonc X X X 0 O X X _ X X X 0 O 0 X X X X X X X X x_ X* X 0 O 0 O X X. BlueRrint _Md_ Photocobv Services 40 ook, Gift, and Stationary Stores X x X X X X X X X (tither than adLet related material) X X X X X x X X X Candy and Cnasectionaries X x x sr v China and Glassware Stores X X __ X X X X_ x X. Christmas Tree Sales Lots - - foperatir� nn a temporary basis) X X X X Churches O a O' - 0 0 0--0 0 0 0 O 0 r` 0 0 Cleaning & Pressing st blicbMgnts_X X X X X Y X X X X 0 Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavem) including relat d entgrinipment 0 O f1 n 0 0 () 0 0 fl 0 0 Commercial Recreation: a) Indoor uses such as bowli7g and billiards 0 O O 0 O O O O 0 b) Outdoor uses such as tennis land basketball 0 0 _ O 0 C) O Q O 0 Convalescent Facilities & 'iosoitals O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 SZ ^ 0 0 0 C= in Drapery Shops X _ X x X X - X X Day Care Cetite , O O O OH O n 0 O 0 Delicatessens & Specialty Food stores X X X X - X X X x X X* Drug Stores and Pharmacies _ over iG,000 sq. ft. X X X X x X o Pharmacies with or without s specialty retail under Educational institutions, parochial Private (including colleges and universities) EXHIBIT A -3 , PFR4fITTFQ A%12 Subarea One RETAIL COMMERCIAL Subarea Two Subarea Tla ce S.:barea F,:_r 4 4 4 . CC I MR 1 "Irmo s Markets _ X X s( X Floor CoverinS Sh„°n�r _X _ X ?C X Fjnrisr Shoos X X _ X X X X X X }t X x Furniture Stores Y X X X X X Hardware Storer X X �C X Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducin¢ Clinics X ft O iiobbv Shc� s -IL -X _ 7( O X X+ X X -' x • X Y. X 10-, Cr am stores k Soda Fe+mtair, __x X X X X X X X X X+ Janitorial 9 -rvi s and �Dpli e_ X_ 3Sutelry Stores X X _. X _ .X �_ X X• X X_ X X X 0 Laundry tee(f cetvicet X vX X X O_ Y Leather Goo dc and .image Stores X X g_ }� X X X Libraries and museums, x Public and private 0 Liquor Stores 00 p p Q Messenger and Wirer, tyicec X X X 'a•` X X ^r •I ye Mortuaries 6 Cemer-aries -- Mu,ic, Dance, and Martial Arts StLdio� _ 0 X d k X X X N wcpaner and `a$a >tne C�tor; X X 7f X X x }( y X. Nurseries & Garden Supply Stores within enclosed area x }I Office, Business Machine and Comeuter Comoonettt stores X X Pam[. Glass. Walloaper X X X� X X X 0 and 3toreK X X X Y Parking facilities (com- mercial) where f_,i are charged 0 Parks and. recreation facilities public and private Pet Shops X-2L— X 7k __ X X0 Photoco'61 =_ — X X _ �.. X_ X Political or philanthropic headquarters 0 Private and public clubs and lodges, I - J, including YMCA, YWCA, and similar youth group uses 0 Record and Cave Stores X X- X X X X, Recreational vehicle storage yards t) Restaurants (sit down): a) With entertainment and/or serving of alcoholic beverages O j O O O O O O O O 0 b) Incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocktail lounge, bar.. entertainment, or dancing) X X O X Y 0 X X O O X X c) Cafe, limited to 20 mts (including outdoor stating) X X X X x X X x X O X X g d) Fast Food: with dr[ve•taru O p O O O 0 withflut drive -thru O O eHIRP'i -4 ,5EIVt;i;ARY TABLE OF P _R'ttl,TTEr_M AND CO%DITIO \A - -Y PERMITTED (0) USES Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four RSTAiI. COMM6RCraL t' -4 fcont 1 S P MR P SCCC O M2 "IP S [Y CO AIR TiR r , t RR^ I 0 g utorec. Sa{ nd Reoa+ X X X X=X X X_ Y, Y ciaity Retail L �) O O O- O 0_ J Sporting Goods Storer, a) Speci,ity: backpacking, tennis, skiing, moue - ta, -�ninff fishing- c(L, X X X x b) Ger-ral; encorpassing a variety of aports a uinment X X X X X Etillermt*k is X X X X X Swimming Pool _$ypnlies X X X X X T,ailQr Shoos X X X X X X Television, Radio, VCR, Stereo and omoonent S 1eL X % X X X Toy Stores X _X X X X X X X Variety Department Stores, Junior Degartme'�t. Stores O X O X 0. X X X Veterinary (domestic): a) Non- boarding X O X O X X X 3; 0 bl Boarding 0 O 0 O O 0 Watch and Clock Repair Stores X X X X X X X X X X` .wi'rirdaee roods Stores X X X X X Vocational or business trade schools 0 Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four EM UaENT ii CULTURAL USES SC CC O UV , P S _ -C O MR bMM S _ _ CC CO LMR MR tt MU CC RC C MR Ll Arcadte _ ___a 111 0 O 0 O 0 0 Cultural /Artist Exhibits: a) Indoor gallery and art sales b) Outdoor art exhibits X O X X O X. O X O X X O X O Discotheones 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O_ Theaters: a) Dinner theater O O O O O O O O b) Movie theater O Q 0 0 0 Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four OFqCE & A MINIS iRATtVE��$ t- ll MR P SC CC O MR MHR oC CC CO LMR MR U hiU C�RRC MR LI0 Administrative, Business, and Professional office X X X X X X X X X X X X• X Banks, Finance Services & Institutions . without drive -thru X X X X X X X X X O X X X - with drive..'-.- 0 0 0 O O 0 0 go- O 0 O n ,<<e- rod Office Service_c_._X X_ X X X X X x Interior Decorating Firms X X X X X X X X X X X Medical/Dental Offices & Related eatth Clinics X X X X X X X O X X• X ntician and 013tometricat Shops Realtors 2nd Ara! Fctatr Offices - X X _ X X X X X X X X X X O X X X X X X. X X X' 'ravel Agencies X X X X X X X_ X X X X• X l ��I EXHIBIT A -S v` Si11VIM 4 Y TARLE OF PERMITT .1) (XI AND (`t NDIT`ONAi T Y P R5113TF'D ffti iiSl C Subarea One Subarea Two 'Subarea Three Subarea Four RESIAENTTAL LTCF_ SC CC Q MR;^ S n MR MHR S _ � � N T R*i R. MR i n �` Cut 1.A .. 18h�..SS.�.S�.�.._.>� . Single Family Detached x X x x Single Family Attached (dupt-t, Multi - Family _Dwellincs x _X _x x X _ Ancillary Residential Uses: a) home -care facilities (ti or less) X X X X X X b) On -site private recreat.:;n — facilities X X X X X X_. X Accessory Uses: a) Accessory structures X X X X X X X bl Home APentiation X X x X x . ZrX Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four PUBLIC US -S Sr CC n MR n SC 12 MR tMrk W.,a;;Calla ., . LtR Lr MU ['r^ Vacbm-W Transit Facilities _ Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Thee Subarea Four HOTEL. D.RaS _ t (� t r r�ttt P CPS r+r• rs err: Hotel /Motel -�8iL1 �-—S � n T � MK u Mtl C('. RR t` MR L r t)I Ancillary Uses: a) Beauty/Barber Shop b) Cafes c) Catering Services d) Cocktsil Lounge e) Conference /Convention X Facilities D Florist Shops g) Gift Shops h) Newspaper/Magazine Stones i) Pharmacies j) Rr tau rants (si down) k) Tiurist Information Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea 1'Iree,. Subarea Four Stern .... -- - - '- -- - - All indusoial uses and development standards shall be as provided in S•ib -area 7 of the Industrizi Arc9 Specific Plan (ISP), Refer to RRC mote ( ") Section X5,2 IY,S.4d _ X X O O a X X X x X % Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea 1'Iree,. Subarea Four Stern .... -- - - '- -- - - All indusoial uses and development standards shall be as provided in S•ib -area 7 of the Industrizi Arc9 Specific Plan (ISP), Refer to RRC mote ( ") Section X5,2 IY,S.4d _ ■■ Q ti y.. • = uj MCE to I u 11 t 2 Ci Lt�f I ice__ 0 W i i I ; a< IC tu maa tr`w 14 r 10 T 1 i o a� ►: at 3 ea o z us to v W IL V - LU cc �w rZ7Nis.' EXHiBI. Y A-7 r 0701-102 10 JUNE 12'; 1991 P.C. AGENDA 4 of 7 ) Ado 1k � J3 emnnmnjm r animei6 j svaemrer�eer I � ag r g ___ - -� % e • s e • • 418141!! "4. ",tSt mW11 "m118X1ni9!2. -_ ,,w.r, &z 3 «kit co - - r - - -� - - -� ( -��` I � � i 110 SUB -AREA 4 ACTIVITY CENTER MAP SUB —AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA c EXHIBIT A -8 9.9 SUBAREA FOUR L1\Nd! USE REGULATIONS 9.9.1 Primary Function /Location I l 1 Subarea Four is located contiguous to the Foothill Corridor, between the Devorey =--- -- . i t -15 Freeway and East Avenue. Subarea r + f i IC C]e�4:;0:) pq u S Four acts as a .major . gatewa; into the 01 , � n. city of Rancho Cucamonga and is acterized by a variety of commercial. Igi l I residential, industrial uses, and mixed use /residential. Regional related uses will I 1 I be provided adjacent to the Devore Free- 1 ' way, designed to compliment the Victoria ► I I Gardens Regional Shopping Center. .. • '• The following matrix establishes the uses which are permitted W, conditio!•aliy —_- perr rted (0). or not permitted h,'each- of the five affected land use 1' 1 subcategories. a NOTE: Gite Development Standards Section 9.9.3.2 and 9.9.3.3 shall apply to shaded ar_as only- &-°)B-AREA 4 ACTIVITY CENTER MAP t l 7.,?71�I�'�9t , G"111111 A, F^ :5� EXHIBIT A -* 2.9,2 Permitted and Conditional Uses Retall Commercial Uses - Land Use CC RRC MR Ll * * p Antique Shops Apparel'' Stores- 3) Boutiques k X b) General X X Appliance Stores and Repair X X Art, Music, and photographic Studios and Supply Stores x X* Auto Service Station 0 0 0 Auto Service (including motorcycles, boats, trailers and campers: a) Sales (with ancillary repair facilities) 0 0 b) Rentals \ O c) Minor Repair (does not Include major engine work;, muffler shops, painting, body work, upholstery, etc.) b O d) Coin -op Washing O p e) Automatic Washing O o f) carts and Supplies X X Bakeries (retail only), X X Barber and Beauty Shops X. X* ac Bed and Breakfast O Bicycle Shops X X* Blueprint and Photo Copy Services x X x Book, Gift, and Stationary Stcrss X X p (other than adult related material) Candy and Confectioneries X X* Catering Establishments X X Ci31na and Glassware Stores X X* SUS -AREA DESxO'A STANDARDS' AND LAND l•'SE REGULATION 6 (P EXHIBIT A -10 Retain Commercial Uses - Continued Land Use CC RRC MR LI ** o Christmil Tree /Pumpkin Sales lots Operated on a Temporary Basis X Churches 0 0 o Cledning and Pressing -Est ablishments X X Cocktail Lounge -(bar, lounge, tavern) Including re',esed entrr'iainment 0 0 0 Commercial Recrentt en: a) Indoor uses such as bowHa g, billiards O o b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball 0 0 o Convalescent Facilities and 9ospitals O 0 0 0 Curtain and Drapery Shops X X Da,; Care Centers O 0 Delicatessens and, Specialty Food Stores X X* Drug Stores and Pharmacies X X ' Educational institutions, parochial, private (including colleges and universities) 0 Farmers Markets x X ' Florist Shops X x t x Floor Coveri;xg Situps X X Furniture Stares Y X Hardware Stores X X Health and Athletic Gyms and Weighs Reducing Clln qc X X* x Bobby Shops X X" Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X X* Jewelry Stores X X* Janitorial Services and Supplies X X* o { Laundry (Self Service) X Leather Goods and Laggage Stores X X t I EXHIBIT A -11 � Retail Commerci- 'll Uses - Commercial Land Use CC RRC MR L( ** Libraries and museums, public and private p Liquor Stores 0 NW Messenger and Wire Services X X* Mortuaries and cemetaries 0 Music, Dance, and Martial Arts Studios X Newspaper and Magazine Stores X X* Nurseries and Carden Supply Stores Within Enclosed Area X X Office, Business Machine and Computer Component Stores X X 0 Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores X X Parking facilities (com- mercial) where fees are cAarged 0 Parks and recreation facilities, public and private p Pet Shops X X* Photocopy (Xerox) X X* Private and public clubs and lodges. including YMCA, YWCA, end similar youth rou 4 P uses 0 i Political or philanthropic headquarters 0 Recreational vehicle storage yards 0 Record and Tape Stores X X Restaurants (sit down): a) With entertainment and /or the serving of alcoholic beverages O O o b) Incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment, or dancing) X X x c) Cafe, limiter! to 20 seats (including outdoor seating) X> X x d) Fast Food (with drive -thr) 0 0 0 (Without drive - thew) 0 4 0 SUB -AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATI01,: . 13 EXHIBIT A-12 Retail Commercial Uses - Continued Land Use CC RRC MR Ll * * p Shoe Stores and Shoe Repair Shops X X Specialty Retail p Sporting Goods Stores: a) Specialty; backpacking, X -X tennis, skling,mountaln- eering, fishing, eta::} b) General; encompassing a X X variety of sports equipment Supermarkets X X Swimming Pool Services and Stiles X X Tailor Shops X Televislnn, Radio, VCR, Stereo, and CL`Component Sales X X l Toy Stores X X j Variety Department StcrA-,s, Junior Department Store. X X Veterinary (domestic): ) a) Non- boartling X - X o b) Boarding 0 O Vocational or business trade schools 0' Watch and Clock Repair Shops X X* Yardage Goods Stores X X Entertainment and Cultural Uses Land Use CC RRC MR Ll ** Arcades 0 O Cultural /Artist Exhibits: a) Indoor gallery and art sales X b) Outdoor art exhibits O Discotheques 0 d Theaters; a) Dinner theatre 0 O b) Movie (multi -plex) 0 0 EXHIBIT A -13 `IV-9. Office and Administrative Uses - Land 'Ise CC RRC MR LI ** o Administrative, Business, and Professional Office X X* x Banks, Finance Services and Institutions (with drive -thru) O 0 0 (Without drive -thru) X X x Business and Office Services X x Interior Decorating Shops X x Medical/Dental Offices and Reiazed Health Clinics X X* x Optician and Optametricai,Shnps X X* x Realtors and Rear Estate Offices X '; X* x Travel agencies X X* x Residential Uses - VIP Land Use CC RRC -MR LI o Single Family Detached X Single Family Attaci:ed (duplex, i triplex, fourplex) X Multi- family Dwellings X j t) Ancillary ResiJences: a) home -care facilities (6 or less) X b) On -site private recreation facilities X 2) Accessory Uses. a) Accessory' structures X b) Home occupation X E_ i a SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION I EXHIBIT A -14 i AMh Hotel Uses - Land Use CC RRC MR LI** o 1 t Hotel /Motel X a Hotel Facilities (major). i Ancillary Uses 0 Beauty /Barber Shop X 0 Cafes X 0 Catering Services O 0 Cocktail Lounge O o Conference /Convention Facilities O o Florist Shops X (l o Gift Shops X o Newspaper/ Magazine Stores X o Pharmacies o Restaurants (sit down) K 0 Tourist Informatlon X o Travel Agencies, X * Commercial /Office uses may be located In the RRC distric3 only with the concurrent development of one (l) mas,ar regionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 sq. ft. per site or project. This provision Is intended to facilitate the development of large regionally related uses. Regionally related commercial uses are typified by large scale businesses, which serve a market area significantly larger than those ousinesses which draw customers primarily from the neighborhood or community level. ** All industrial uses and development standards shag be as provided in Sub -area 7 of the industrial Area Specific Plan (1SP). I' iJ ar �°' � EXHIBIT A -15 9.9.3.3 Setbacks Activity Center Yard BuIldirm Parkin 1st Fir. "2nd. Fit. Street Yard (measure from face of the ultimate curb ): o Foothill Eoulevcrd 25' So' 25' So' 45' 351 0- Etlwanda Avenue 25 45` 45` o Roc-nester Avenue Rear Property Line: %J o Adjacent to Existing or Planned u Residential Development 25' 15' a Adjacent to Existing or Planned 5 ' Commercial Development Of Interior Side Property Line: • Adjacent to Existing or Planned 15' Residential Development T,'' �- • Adjacent to Existing or Planned 51 5' Commercial Development ,s{ ': EXHIBIT A -iqr fl RESOLUTION I"O. A RESOLUTION OF THE PYAMING COMMY,SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 'RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91 -01, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH CERTAIN STREETSCAPE AND SITE DESIGN I STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE. TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, ,.AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamongm has initiated an applicatio:. for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. 91 - -01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Community Plan Amendment is referzed to as "the application." (ii) On June 12, 1991, the Planning Commission of,_the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public h&er- Vic, !i" tt"-,- application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the fPlanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the Facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence' presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on June 12, 2.991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this 'Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The amendment pertains to property fronting on Foothill Boulevard within the Terra Vista Planned Community; and (b) The Amendment will "tie" together the visual aspects of Foothill Boulevard as a major commercial corridor through the implementation of Etreetscape and site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan areas located to the east and west of the Terra Vista Planned Community; and (c) The amendment will maintain the same uses that are currently permitted or conditionally permitted under the provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan. F'31? PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TVCPA 91 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jufie 12, 1993. Page 2 v 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts net forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within thw district that is superior to the development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations, and (b) That the amendment will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City; and (c) That the amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development within the district. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, flarther, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves: (a) That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commis5' >rr.Jf the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby rFc- zmmends approval on the 12th day of-June 1991 of Terra Vista' Community Plan Amendment No. 91 -01. (b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. 91 -01, as shown in Exhibit "A" cf the staff report. (c') That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall he forwarded to the city Council. 6. Th> Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. u 61 ; PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CdLAMONr.A I, BY; Larry T. McI'iel, Chairman PLANNING (!OMMISSION`RESOLUTTON NO. TVCPA 91 -01 - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA _' rJ� June 12, 1991 Page 3 ATTEST :. -_ Brad Buller, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho - Cucamonga, do hereby certify that' the foregoing Resolution was, duly and re5,:larly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting- mf_the Planning Commission held on :fie 12th day of June 1991, by the following votii'�to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERSS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSEN'"t,' COMMISSIONERS: a I i r RESOLUTION NO. 2W .d RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING WMHISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91 -01, A REQUEST TO ESTAt3LISH CERTAIN S'REETSCAPE AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOOTHILL.80ULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BCO;,EVARD WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has initiated an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 91 -01 as desc -ibed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject community Plan Amendment is referred tows "the application." (ii) On June 12, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. ,, (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts not forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and corr^ct 2. rased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on June 12, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows- (a) The amendment pertains to property fronting can Foothill Boulevard within the Victoria Planned community; and (b) The amendment will "tie" together the visual aspects of Foothill Boulevard as a major commercial corridor through the implementation of streetecape and site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan areas located to the east and west of the Victoria Community Planned Community; and (c) The amendment will maintain the same uses that are currently permitted or conditionally permitted under the provisions of the Victoria Community Plan. J- / 740 PUMNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.. VC11A 91 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 12, 1991 Po-Re 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced - public hearing and upoit the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above this 6ol mission hereby, finds and concludes as follows: 04 That the amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the district that is superior to the development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and (b) That the amendment" will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and kith related development and qrt t4z management policies of the City; and (c) That the amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, publi. utilities, and public services required by development within the district. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of- 2970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves: (a) That pursuant to Srtion 65850 to 65855 of the California: Government, Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 12th day of June 1991 of Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 91 -01. (b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 91 -01, as shown in Exhibit "A" of the staff report. =' (C) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 6. The Secretary to this commilsion shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. .APPROVED AND ADOPTEDA THIS 12TH. DAY nF JUN>S 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3Y: Larry T.'McNiel, Chairman v�� f a 11 PLANNING COMMISSION,RESOLUTION I40. VCPA 91 -01 - CITY OF RANCL'O CUCAMONGA June 12, 1991 ?age 3 a ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary. �. I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and ad'bpted by the Planning Commisaion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of tte Planning Commission held on the 12th day of Jvne 1991, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES C0MMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: . j _1 i 1 F- T9. 4. r j RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMIS " 310V OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 'CALIFORNIA, ?XCOMMLftgDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL. _SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91 -04, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH CERTAIN STREETSCAPE AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAILING FINDINGS Li SUPPORT THEREOF: A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has initiated an application f6r Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 91 -04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Specific Plan Amendment is re£errei to as "the application. (il) on June 12, 1991,; the Planning Commission 'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the _adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detee J, and resolved= by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamoi, 'allows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finde t•,q_.all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this P•esolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on June 12, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The amendment pertains to property fronting on Foothill Ill Boulevard within tha Industrial Arita Spe-I.fic Plan and (b) The amendment will -is" together the visual aspects of Foothill ;foul -znrd as a major commercial corridor throucah the implementation of straets.ape and site desiTI standards consistent with the 7cothill Boulevard Specific Plan areas located to the east and we,t of the Industrial Area Specific Platt; and (c) bhp *%wandment will maintain the same issues that are currently pr=:Xttw conditionally permitted under the proviniona of the Industrial Area S r Plan. �. 9 PLANNING COMMISSION RES01,7TION NO. ISPA 91 -04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 12, 1991 , Page 2 3.I Based upon the substantial evidence_ prevented to this Commiseion during the above- referencad public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts net fGxth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the amendment willz ` ,ovide for development of a ` comprehensively planned urban community wji" i:he district that is superior , to the development otherwise allowable undc—alternate 'regulatione and (b) That the amendment wilt, provide for develnptnant withinn the district in aA manner consistent with the Genaral Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City; and (o) That the amendment will provide for Vie conetruction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required j't `^velopment within the district. 4. This Commission- •',jpte; finds that the project hav been rcrsieued and considered in complianv- thn California.Environmental, Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this t ,aim nn ,hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragrap'rs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves: (a) That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval cn the 12th day of June 1991 of Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 91 ->04. (b) The P1ann;nq Commission hereby recommends that the City Council aplszove and Adopt ''Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 91 -04, as shown in Exhibit "A" of thi staff report. (:) That a Certified Copy of thie Resolution and -elated materiel hereby adopted by the Planning Commission, shall be forwarded to the City Council. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall cestii'y to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JUNE 1591. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9Y• Larry T. McNiel, 'Chairman F— r / V r` PLANNING COM.`4ISSION- BSOLUTION NO. ' ISPA 91 -04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t June 12, 1991 Page 3 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Br-id Bailer, Secretary' of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution' was duly and i" regu)ax1y introduced, passed, and adopted by the Punning Commission of the $ l;ty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting "of.the Planning Commission hold olithe 12th day of Rune 1991, by the following vote -to- wits AYES: COMMISSIONERSa h § NOESa COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i r P-1 AN e UITY Ors, uiANCHO CUCA MONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 12, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL: ASSESSMENT AND MODIFICATION TO! CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -06 - RICHARD STENTCA - Modification of conditions of approval to allow land uses requiring 'a more intensive parking ratio than the one provided for research and development (1 space per 350 square feet) within an exis *,inq industrial complex on 13.1 acres of land in the General :r-. astri;al District (Subarea 11) ;of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the ,northwest- corner of Buffalo and 6th Street APN: 229 - 261 -78. Staff recomm;,nds issuance of a Negative Declaration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT`ZND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-03 - JAMES PAGE The request to establish a "mini - mall" (swap meet)` in a leased space of 103,552 square feet within an existing industrial center on 13.77 acres of land in the General Industrial District, (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229- 026: -28. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related file Conditional Use Permit 86-06. L RECOMMENDATION: Staff vccomnmends that the Planning Commission continue these items to the June 26, 1991, Planning Commission meeting. The applicants )lave eaquested the continuance in order to address those issues (i.e., parking) identified at the April 24, 1991 mee g during the review if Industrial Specific Plan dment 41-03. pectf s ted, Bra 3 B "t City Pl�nner BB Ard / /7f; Attachmer''s. Applicants' Letters I1.13S3 K 8 L Mission ou - 1 May 20, 1991 Ms. Anna -Lisa Hernandez Assistant Planner ry Planning Department �I City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho ,! %camoa.ga, CA 9i730 Re; � +estfcor CCarnf`val Mall) Dear Ms. Marnandezz t Carnival Mail is applying to the Pla ►n£n Department at the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a Conditional Use 'Permit to use the existing facilities ioeatp� at 11530 6th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, as a mini mall. Due to a need for additional docFpents, ire are requesting a eft j Contin6ation of the C.U.P. prccems until the'June 26, 1991 Planning Commission Hosting, Your aourtemy and ccnsideraiL£ -,n in this jutter is appreciated. 1 Sincerely, Richard R. Stanton President r fi RRSlms l r i. �j 28202 Cabot Road, Suite 200 • Laguna Niguel, CA • ETto) 843.5888 • Fax 643 -s8l4 0H'`3tllyd AIW_';IklnO3 NOISSIW WOSJ t_'%I t 't t F j ate.. t- ^ 75843 SHERMAN 1NAY VAN NUYB. CA 91406. (618) 997-;1293 J. R. PAGE a:d; ZZ, 1992 CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD 1 Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner e Planning Department' City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130 Bear Ann3-Llsa: Carnival Malls 3s applying to the Planning Depart?lent of the Ci1:Y of Rancho Cucamong& for a CONDITIONAL UU0 PERMIT to use the ( 9xisting F'acilltles located at 1153O ",ITH Street as a MINT- IMALL. Due tc±, a need for additional documental �jn we' are requesting a 2 wsex c6ntinuation in the C.U:eS. process, which would be for the June z6'th meeting of the PLANNING CUMMISSION. AcerelY, as gaga r rrival tiali3 'f a !i T6 —'£ . JC H -w ' -r I in I n- LJ1 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �. 12, 1991 chairman and Members of tho Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Senior Planner NMENTAL ASSESSMENT -AND DR_VELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91 -02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various development standards and design guidelines for multi- family residential districts. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from May 8, 1991.) ENVIRONMENTA', ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91- 02A - CITf OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various development standards and design, guidelines for multi - family residential districts within the $tiwanda Specific Plan area. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from May 8, 1991.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLI.NNED COMMUNIT_' AMENDMENT 91 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA - 'A request to amend various development standards and design guidelines for Multi - fwily residential districts within the Terra, Vista Planned Community area. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from May 8, 1991.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESZMEh-T ANp VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AME1`7MENT 91 -02 -. CITY OF FANCHO CUCAMONGA - A 'request to amend various development standards and design guidelines for multi - family residential districta within the Victoria Planned Community area. Staff recommends issuance of a .Negative 'Declaration.. (Continued from May 8, 1991.) Staff is requesting another continuance to the July 19, 1991, regular meeting, as several of the amendment items require additional time to prepare. Staff is preparing a draft chapter of the design guidebook for multi- family projects, developing now standards for recreation amenities, modifying standards for building separations and setbacks from property lines, etc. Both Lewis Homes and William Lyon Co. are preparing information and new suggested standards for street setbacks to be submitted for staff review. In addition, staff is coordinating with Lewis Homes, who is assisting us in preparing graphics foi^ some of the code amendments. Respectge'My cub ttdd, City Kanner— BS :NF :gs Tffi9S M -P J LA 7 t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 12, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission PROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13321 - C AND G 4 - su v s on parcels ry in th IFery Low Development District (less than 2 welling units per a0*), located on the north side of La Serda Road, viest of Sapphire Street APN: 1051 - 101 -03 I. PROJECT AND SITE_ DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as s > anx 1151 t °e" B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1' .72 acres Parcel 2 .68 acres Parcel 3 - - 68 acres Total 9.08 aci;is- C. Existi!j naming: j Very Low Development District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). D. SurroundIn9 Land Use: North Existing single family 1 South Existing single family East Existing single family West -i Existing single family E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Very Low Residential District South - Very Low Residential District East - Very Low Residential District I West - Very Low Residential District :[TEN Q PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENT PARCEL MAP 13321 - C & G CONSTRUCTION June 12, 1991 Page 2 F. Site Characteristics: Rock terraces exist on the southern portion of the site, a shed on the westerly portion and overgrown shrubs and ground cover exist throughout the site. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this Parcel Map is to ;subdivide 2,08 acres of land into three oarcels for the future development�of separate single family homes. Access is an issue with the project. Thee.. %,parcels will take access From La Senda Road which is currently subsf,4W'ard in terms of width, design and dedications. Exhibit "C" shows the`<<,fte and its relationship to the neighborhood along the La Senda Road /Car: ±1 avenue street system. Exhibit "D" shows the property lines for the !sa5e area. It also shows that offers for dedication of public riglj,�; -of -way were given along the westerly portion of the street. Considering that offers of dedication had already been given on portions of the street, staff requested that the applicant investigate the feasibility of providing a standard width public street from and including his sfte to Sapphire Street. Faced with the difficulty of providing a standard public street, the Developer approached the City Council to have La Senda Road designated as a private street, which could result in lessor street standards. The Council precedings are summarized in the staff report. att?ched as Exhibit "E°. The outcome was that the request for a private street designation was denied, which requires that future developments adjacent to the street provide public street dedications and improvements along their frontages. Based upon the City Council's action, the Developer's Engineer provided an analysis which convinced staff that a full width standard public street could not be provided from the site to Sapp-4 -Street, because of restrictions imposed tr existing adjacent development and the unwillingness of the adjacent property owners to grant the necessary right -of -wady. This project can and will provide the standard half width street dedication of 30 feet. however, providing a standard crown street section is not possible at this time, because of the difficulty in matching the adjacent existing street sections.. The issue then becomes, should the subdivision be allowed or should it be denied due to lack of adequate access. In fact, the subdivision does not strictly conforim to Planning Commission Resolution No. 79 -07 (Exhibit "F "), which requires dedicated access from a proposed subdivision to a maintained City Street unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer and 13 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENT PARCEL MAP 13321 - C & G CONSTRUCTION June 12, 1991 Page 3 Planning Commission. There is no dedicated ste *eet right -of -way from the site to aapphire street nor was the applicant able to obtain that right- o4 -way from the affected property owners. However, the property does have private access rights. The street does meet the requirement that the pavement be 26 feet in width. Approval of the Parcel Map will immediately cri,iate two additional lots taking access from La Senda Road and set a precedent for._ other subdivisions producing as many as another three lots (five total) along the street. This will create more traffic off- what is currently a substandard street. Four of the potential five additional lots that could be created along the street, are on this property and the property immediately on the south side of the street (parcel 17 on Exhibit "D "). Therefore, the majority of the additional traffic will be confined to the area from this property east =to Sapphire Strset minimizing the portion of road subjected to increased traffic. Based upon this and the fact that the portion of street is in need of repair, a condition of approval has been included in the resolution requiring that the portion of the street from the west project boundary to Sapphire Street be reconstructed with potential one -half cost reimbursement from future subdivision of the property to the south. Due to the difficulty in matching the existing adjacent pavement, the required street reconstruction will be less than Ci`Y standard in terms of width and typical section. A condition has been included requiring lien agreements on the proposed parcels for ultimate standard public improvements along the project frontage to be constructed in the future when feasible. Staff is recommaending approval of the Parcel Map for the following reasons: 1. The two additional lots created by this subdivision and the potential for five total lots can be accommodated by the street. 2. Reconstruction of the portion from the site to Sapphire Street will improve the existing access and will help to correct a drainage problem area to the south. .3. The Fire Department did not object to the project. 4. Similar subdivision requests on substandard streets have been approved by the Planning Commission in the past. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. Staff con ucted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to sgrrounding property owners and placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin: Posting at the site has also been completed. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF: REPOIT TENT PARCEL MAP' 13321 - C h G ONSTRUCTION June 12, 1991 =1 Page 4 Adk V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended_ that the Planning 'vnission consider 1l input an elements of the 'tentative Parcel Map 1121. If after such consideration, the Commissio7 can recommend approval, then the adoption J of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Henson Senior Civ�'l Engineer BR,9:BK:OLW� •. Attachments: Exhibit "A" - ViciniU,14ap Exhibit "B" - Tentative Map Exhibit "C" - Area Development Exhibit "D" - Area Property Lines Exhibit "E " - City Council Staff Report Exhibit "F" - Resolution 79 -07 Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval l ii i �� Q !�!! (� t U i w f {N �11 4 � 0 l 1, v w El an le' V> cm Adlk L t3361S�- +- - -•- -.� i) t— -' •- - -- -- 3tltHd2tlS .. A I n- 2 ` a" w a tar. VR! .p1 I Lo", O r/V am IE i� i I DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CIP -- c RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1AFF REPORT February 6, 1091 City Council and City Manager Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Dan James, Ser4.or Civil f:ngineer Designation of La Senda Road and Carol Avenue as private streets and exempting the abutting properties from requirements set forth in Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code RECOM4EMTIONS: It is recommended that the City Council deny the request to designate La Senda Road and Carol Avenue as private street, and exempting the abutting properties from requirements set for in Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code. The reason for denial is due to lack of interest by vast majority of the property owners. BACKGROUND /ANALYSES Prop.-,,ty which are adjacent to private streets (designated in the County prior to incorporation) that have not provioosly been validated by the City as private are required to dedicate any needed right-of -way for the construction of public improvements and, unless exempt due to project size or type, are required to construct needed improv_- ,cents withii these public rights -of -way. These requirements have become the focal point of objections by owners of property on certain residential streets, particularly in the Alt& Loma section of the City, as the; developed their property. Their contention was that, because these streets were unioue in nature and are of substandard design and construction, that the improvement of the street would have a negative effect on thA abutting property and the streets should remain private. Because of there concerns. on July S. 1989, the City Council adopted an Ordinance whicn established a mechanism for the rev+ew and determination 0 whether a street could be designated as a Private Resdential Street. This would thereby exempt the abutting properties to these streets from the requirements set forth in the Municipal Code for the dedi ation of public right -of -way and the construction of public improvements. This action regarding La Senda Road and Carol Avenue was triggered by the developers, C & G Construction, when applying for Tentative Parcel,1fap 13321 they were infnmed that offer of street dedication, off -s__ = `treet improvements and other engineering requirements will be required prior to map recordation or building permit issucnce whichever occurs first. The uwners contended that La Senda Road and Carol Avenue, which their property abuts, � F—XH I MIT "F—" (10 1:4 ) CITY COUNCIL STAFF FFFORT LA SENDA RD/CAROL AVE FEBRUARY b, 1991 PAGE 2 Aft were private and that the above mentioned requirements should not pertain. The property owners were given an option of filing an application to the City Clerk's office per Ordinance No. 58 -C for the review and determi }ration if the street is private and eventually setting up a public hearing date for the City Council review. The owners subsequently submitted a petition of owners of property abutting La Senda Road and Carol Avenue (63.3% of the total parcels affected) requesting that the City Ceincil make a determination. On La Senda .Road and Caryl Avenue, several offers of street dedication exist and are recorded but were not accepted by the City.: However, there are two properties that the street dedications were inadvertently accepted by the City in 1979 without full public impnvements when the county was reviewing the plans and maps on behalf of the City. Vacation proceedings would have to occur in order for any declaration of private street to be finalized.' The referenced subjects have been seat to the'%Fire District for review and comimnt. The main concerns of the Fire District are 26 feet wide emergency fire access, street capability to handle ?O,GOO 1bs of emergency equipment and barrier protection for existing fire hydrants, On October 17, 1990 City Council meeting, Engineering presented the report summarizing the b;,nv_® concerns of the Fire District and the City Council Am recommended to forward the application to the Public Safety Commission for direction. Engineering staff met with the Public Wo acs Sub - Committee on severe: occasions to diirw, , the issues involved. Also, the property owners were invited to attend '± discussion greeting with Engineering and Public Works Saab- Committee and expressed their concerns. Otte of the concerns from the property owners, is that if the street does eventually become public how would it be constructers in IIght of the existing structures and physical restraints. Also they expressed concern over the difficulty to get 100% cooperation from property owners in accomplishing any type of improvements or any type of anreement fos^ ongoing maintenance. They also expressed concerns wMether the conditions imposed on thew would be for all future private street requests. They stated that they have seen fire trucks use their streets as it is now, so wiry would they have to do any Improvements -now? These are a few of the several concern; discussed. Based upon our overall review and analysis of counts from the Fire District and the Public Works Sub- Cownnittee, public safety has been the again concern. On November 8, 1990, Engineering Staff forwarded the following specific conditions to the Public Safety Commission, and received approval. A. move and replace failed portions of existing pavement'with 3" asphalt concrete over compacted native soil as determined by I m i, CITY COUNCIL STAFF PeF')RT LA SENDA RD /CAROL AVE FEBRUARY 6, 1991 PAGE 3 Engineering and Fire Division. Widen pavement to 26 feet wide with 3" asphalt concrete over compacted native soil for full length of street. Overlay 1" thick of asphalt concrete over remaining existing asphalt concrete. B. Provide documentation indicating minimt -_n of 26 feet wide private access easement for the full length " ~La Senda Road and Carol' Avenue. C. Provide for additional private access easement for adequate emergency vehicle "hammerhead" turn around at the north side of the Intersection of La Senda Road and Carol Avenue. Or a paved turnaround with a minimum 38 feet radius at the end of Carol Avenue. D. Barrier protection for existing fire hydrants. E. CC and R's or equivalent covenant agreement approved by the City Attorney concerning proper maintenance of Street, signed by all property owners, within a period of 6 months from City Council designation of private street. At the City Council meeting of November 21, 1990,'La Senda Road /Carol Avenue was presented for consideration of private street designation. Two property Allk owners, south of La Senda Road, voiced concerns regarding drainage issues. The staff report was taken off the agenda and staff was directed to review the drainage issues more thoroughly. Staff has reviewed the drainage issues and met with the two property owners who voiced the initial concern. There presently exist 46 feet wide offer of drainage easement which has not been accepted by the City. Based upon the analysis of staff, only a 25 -feet wide drainage easement is required for possible future ' public drainage improvements. As of the date of this writing their concerns have not been resolved. With the recommendation of this staff report to deny the request of the designation of La Senda Road /Carol Avenue as private, the two property owners' concerns no langer affect the processing of this agenda item. Their specific present play drainage concerns are being handled as a separate issue. If La Senda Road were to be improved for a public street, the City would then take flours from the north side and direct theta easterly towards Sapphire within La Senda. This would reduce the flows towards the existing drainage channel. However, if La Senda is designated as private then the existing drainage would not be diverted down Le Senda towards Sapphire. In the same manner improvements are being required to allow appropriate emergency access for public safety so should drainage improvements be required in the conditioning for allowirc La Senda to go private. The precise drainage Improvements were not determined because of the apparent lack of interest of the property owners along La Senda Road,/Carol Avenue. However, should they become unified and pursue the private street again then precise drainage improvements would be detenained. L%,14iIS I4 "E' (73 6F4) 08 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REF)RT LA SENOA- RO6CAROL AVE FEBRUARY 6, 1991 PAGE 4 Since th! City Council meeting of Hovembe¢ 21, 1990, engineering has not received any inquiries from property owners of 'La Senda Road and Carol Avenue. A meeting was arranged for the property owners of La Senda'&�_" Avenue. The meeting was on January 23, 1991, at 6:60 p.m. Only one property owner attended. The property owner was informed that staff was going to recommend rejection of the request for ,private street designai..ion. 'Also, a letter has been sent to each property owner notifing them of Staffs recommendation to deny the request to designate La Senda Road/Carol Avenue as private and encouraging them to attend the public Gearing. Based on the above overall observations, Engineering staff is recommending to deny the designation of La Serida' Road/Carol Avenue as prTvats streets. However,, if in the future the property owners decide to pursue this matter, the aforementioned specific conditions should be imposed, including drainage ;improvements. Respectfully s ted rwo:aJ :alw - Attachments j I I EM41 MIT'o ., C4 OF 14) CP RESOLUTION NO. 79 -07 Aft a A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CCe�JMIISSION OF THE CITY 0 ✓RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABT�SHING SUBDIVISION ACCESS IMPPMV, EMENT POLICY. ' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of !she City of Rancho Cucamonga wishits to discourage the proliferation of private unimproved streets; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish firm policy guideline to i, inform property owners of the City goals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IS RESOLVED AND ESTABLISHED, that as a condition F of approval of any Parcel Map, %Parcel Map.Waiver, Tract Map or Lot Line Adjustment an applicant shall have access to a fully dedicated and maintained City street.` Where dedications and improvements do not ,exist, the applicant shall obtain a minimgm,cf forty (40) feet of dedication and improve with` twcnty -six (26) feet of pavement rleded street frontage to reach the nearest maintained Cit-1 street: Variations from this policy will require approval of the City Engineer of the City -of Rancho Cucamonga subject to appeals to the Planning Commission. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1979. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: erman Rempel, Chairmarf ATrES ! Secretary of the Planning Commisgiun I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of January, 1979, by the following vote to-wit: AYES: CMISSIONERS; GARCIA, TOLSTOY, Job7ES, DEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NMM ABSENT: CO MISSIONERS: DAIS. l 3 EXH 1 MIT � Pi v' RESOLUTION NO. Aftk Wr A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,_ CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCET }AAP NUMBER 3.3321, LOCATED ON THE NORTH i SIDE OF LA SENDi -ROAD, WEST OF SAPPHIRE STREET AND MAXLNG E FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1061 - 101 -07 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13321, submitted by C and G Construction, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 3 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN 1061. - 101 -07, located on'the north side of La Senda Road, east of Sapphire Street; and WHEREAS, on June 13, 1991, the Planning `lammission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE,RANCHO CUCAMKINGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the following findings hLve been made; 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the propossd subdivision is consistent with that General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdjvision and improvements will not cause substantial env rommnntal dam-ge or public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental I Quality Act of 1970; and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 13321 is hereby approved subyect to the attached Standard conditions and the following Special Cov- .Ations; ,{ Enainserino Division i 1. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Gods Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, {I vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding 1p c) I 1p% . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOT�;TION NO. TENT PARCEL M" 13321 C & G CONSTRUCTION June 12. 1991 Page 2 the associated envizonmental action is filed and pouted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of than County of .San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together wif \a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. - In the event this application Is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. - 2. Reconstruct, La Sanda Road from the west project boundary to Sapphire Street as :follows: a. Pavement:. The existing pavement �� shall be removed and replaced 4Ath 3- -inch asphalt concrete over compacted native soil as approved by the Engineering and Fire Divisions and shall be 26 feet in width. b. Typical Section: Provide a straight tilt section with curb and gutter, along the south edge. if this type of section cannot be designed to meet the existing conditions (causes excessively steep driveways, etc.), then a "v" section with a center concrete ribbon gutter may be used. c. Drainage: The street section sh__ be designed to contain a Q100 for the total area on the north side of La Senda Road extending from Sapphire Street to and including the property at the northwest corner of 1La Sends Road and Carol Avenue considering all properties to be fully developO If the flows cannot be contained within the street aecti a storm drain or other method of conveying tha flows` "shall ba provided as approved by the City Engineer and Building Official. d. Cost Reimbursement: - The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to rocover one -half the cost of the improvements from the future subdivision of the proparty {;n the south side Of La Senda Road (APN: 1061- 101 -17). �f 'Ultimate standard public street improvements shall be provided along the parcel frontages- at such time in the future that their construction is feasible. Said improvements shall be guaranteed by a lien agreement to be executed prior to recordation of the Final Parcel Map. Q15, PLANNING COXHISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT PARCEL MAP 13321 C & G CONSTRUCTION June 12, 1991 Page 3 Afflk 4. An in -lieu fee as contribution to the fu'6ure undergrourling of the existing overhead utilities (te'lecommunicatiens and electrical) on the project side of La S41nda Road shall be paid to the City prior to the recordation of the Final Parcel Lisp.' The fee shel, be the full City's adopced unit amount times th,, ra 4 length of the project frontage. .- The Developer ma }� raquest a), reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City's adopted'; cost for undargmoundkng ftz -the future subdivision as it occurs; on the ",,posits aide of the streat. Planning Division 1. Provide a 15 foot local equestrian. trail along the north property line of Parcels 1, 2, and 3. 2. Prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance r building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall I consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project Bits to provide in conjunction ws.th tiee applicable school district for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community gacilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing district prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further,, if the affected school district has not formed a cello Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months of the date of approval of the project and prior to the reco =dation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLSN M COXHISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EY• • Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: -- - Brad Buller, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamotaga, do hereby certify that the foregoing. "..esolution was duly and regular "y introduced, passed, ane,'-adopted by the Planning Commission of the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT PARCEL MAP 13321 - C & G CONSTRUCTION June 12, '1991 Page 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of June 1997,.?. by the following vote -tnj -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERSs ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 r rPle Ic A r v C 8 C �y IT \,I Ic Y ° C °•.1 L V N O � N`•^ `s uy w �b �tY •n V t•V �'� Yi Vv .°a�� L L.1' y�. Y G � G� 9 �` � pN � f• q� E`, yak. •• ppC� e L N � 'ne.'O. $.ii Sao t, C $Su w yr MI ^1 is E2 .� `�� s 4 Z� m c t 4i w •� .=i �Y yy.. F_ �K(. �■1� Y� O {D: �! 0 O i V W Y• � v i ^ y' r� � + d�' N Y + +� 4 � l �• > N 6 L V ^. a i N y Y y^ M� � � 7 ^ � N o v N. bb M � d" y � yes. O w�'r p� �..� L'• q� °� H M-0 L�s W5w4 S'� Yn we Q�� L y Mg v $ O O p N L 9W 4 4 K O H N r N A �5 L. L •� �L J s - �s GF Et 3L �N rq r y_ L Nw �g �NZ a� € Ira 8 L CrG Y d OYN q4 Y.II .., r OC n 4}70 .- M � n., g Y Y n,• a.. Yan a a. t .°•.. ° ou_ LL I—b �C� IgYYY OLN Y YlY'' �1O,lt 6 +� 6�< p� SOO ��i V. y3 SJCLO Yf )O W P L y Mg v $ O O p N L 9W 4 4 K O H N r N A �5 L. L u s83� J Q Y V GF Et 3L �N rq r y_ L Nw a) L Ira 8 L CrG Y d OYN q4 Y.II O� gY ' w d 0 0 11 Et 3L �N rq r y_ L Nw Ira 't L CrG Y d OYN N. R. Y.II 0 11 A L4,wis homes Maimgement Corp. , Nct�o cucA�anNGs 115,5 Math Mountain Avenue / P.U. Bw,170/ Upland, Cdifomia 91785.0670 71A1985 -0971 FAX :7141949.6700 {;�j( W June 12, 1991 ' City of Rancho Cucamonga lil.3!ID DELIVEBI 14500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 Lttn Mr. Larry McNeil, Planning Coi`mtisaion Chairman Ref.: Planning Commission. Meeting of Ja* 124 1991 Public Hearing Item R: Environmental Assessment and Tentaive Tract 1 ?808 and vacation of a Portion of East Avenue- -iewis 1 domes I Dear Mr. McNeil: This is to request the continuance of the above-referenced Public Hearing itc:a f: om thtf June 12, 1991, ,"Vlanning Cox -. Vision meeting to that of July 10, 1991. Ths will hopefully allow us adequate time to addrass: with the City staff concerns we have aver some of the recommended conditions of approval on the Tentative Tract Map. Thank . you for your consideration. Cordially, LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. } Camille G. Bahri Project Manager CGB :ksk i j Cf j A L4,wis homes Maimgement Corp. , Nct�o cucA�anNGs 115,5 Math Mountain Avenue / P.U. Bw,170/ Upland, Cdifomia 91785.0670 71A1985 -0971 FAX :7141949.6700 {;�j( W June 12, 1991 ' City of Rancho Cucamonga lil.3!ID DELIVEBI 14500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 Lttn Mr. Larry McNeil, Planning Coi`mtisaion Chairman Ref.: Planning Commission. Meeting of Ja* 124 1991 Public Hearing Item R: Environmental Assessment and Tentaive Tract 1 ?808 and vacation of a Portion of East Avenue- -iewis 1 domes I Dear Mr. McNeil: This is to request the continuance of the above-referenced Public Hearing itc:a f: om thtf June 12, 1991, ,"Vlanning Cox -. Vision meeting to that of July 10, 1991. Ths will hopefully allow us adequate time to addrass: with the City staff concerns we have aver some of the recommended conditions of approval on the Tentative Tract Map. Thank . you for your consideration. Cordially, LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. } Camille G. Bahri Project Manager CGB :ksk i j �I 1j +CITY OF RANCHO CU'CAMONGA STAFF RE, PORT DATE; June 12, 1991 TO: Chairman and udmhexs of f.he Planning Commission . j. FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahnr Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMEMM ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13SOu`' -AND VACATION OF A PORTION OF EAST AVE^7JE - LEWIS HC ! A residential subdivision of 49 single family lot, on 34.1 acres of , land in the Very Low Residential District (1 -2 dwel3ing units pei acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Sumrdit and East Avenues - APR: 225 - 181 =04, 06, 07, 08, 42, and 43 and 225-201- 28. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Associated with -this prJect is Tree Removal. Permit 91 -15. i I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: -Approval of the subdivision design, ' Conceptual Grading Plan, Conceptual Landscape Plan, and Vacation and issuance of a Negativ.� Declaration. B. Project Density: 1.44 dwelling units per acre C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninc;c North - Single family residential; Estate F.esy' -Aal District f'i;'Z -1 dwelling units per acre). South \,scant, Single family residential) very Low Residential. District (1+-2 dwelling, units per acre). East - Vacant, Single family residential; Very Low' Residential District (1 -2 dwelling units per acre). West Sings,:''' ft- Y-' residential; Very Low Residential District_ (1 -2 dwelling visits per acre) D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North Very Low Residential South - Very Low Residential -... Ea >,t Very Low Residential West Very Low Residential - ITEW R f - `_LANNn1G OMMISSION STAPP REPORT `TF_NTATIVE TRA T 13808 /1EWIS HOMES __- June 12, 1997 _ Page 2 E. Site Characteristics,_ tic The project site is currently vacant,, with slope. ranging' rom 3 to 5 percent sloping from the north. Vegetation zonsists of several Eucalgpti;�:; w,njrn a =and native grass ana weeds. 11. ANkLYSIS• A. Background: The project Tract Map is the second development app`..rcati.on submitted for subdivision of the project site. On Ag,il 1, 1981, the City Coue.cil approved Tentative -Tract 11549,, -a zesidential subdivision of 90 single fa:_i.ly lots. On May 4, 1984, bract 11549 -1 recorded, which included 27 lots of the original subdivision. Development approvals of the remainder of the project sit;' expired prior to Tract Map recordation. The carntnt appl %ration provides for the subdivision of that remaining acreage. B. General: Tb�, applicant is;,.proposing a`Tentative Tract Map consisting of a 49-lot subdivision with lots ranging in size -, from 20,290 square feet to 36,230 sa+are feet with an average size of 25,3ir4 square feet (See Exhibit "B "). Tne track will provide for throuSl% street connectio to two adjacent tracts. Blue Gum Drive will connect .yt the tract's west boundary hitY Tract 11549 -1 and Shoshone Place will connect at the tracts north boundary with Tract 12462. C. Design Review Committee: 0;x duly 19, 1990, the Committee (McNiel, Weinberger, Coleman'�reviewed the prc,ect but did not recommend approval due to the following concerns: 1. The lots at the north end of Kincaid Court should be redesigned so that no lots rear -on to Summit Avenue. The bmmittee directed the applicant to consider modifying the ti.-.t design by increasing the length of Kincaid Court, posii1bly placing the cul -de -sac bulb adjaces,c ; _o the north tract boundary. 2. The intersection) of Blue Gum Drive and East Avenue should be" redesigned entry median treatment consistent with Blue Gera Drive and i Etiwanda Avenue. 1 3. The East Avenue wall should provide a corm transition wall, consistent' with established_ wall ' &x signs along East Avenue. This will provide a nar:ive stone wall,, between stone pilasters, roughly parallel to;, the street corner. The PLANNING COMMISSION S'T'AFF REPORT J' TENTATIVE TRACT 13808 /LEWIS HOMES j Jnne 12, 1991 G Page 3 qP corner transition wall should be provided at V.e southwest corner of Summit Avenue and East Avenue and at the northwest corner of Blue Gum Drive and East Avenue. The applicant then revised the )project Uesed upon design recommendations presented by the Committee. On January 17, 1991, the Committee, (McNiel, Valletta, Coleman) reviewed modifications to the project design and recommended approval of Tract 13808. During staff review and at the Design Review Committee meeting specific car. ^erns were expressed regarding the design of the lots at the`�,?orth end of both Artesian Court and Kincaid Court. The applicant 'was dit"ted to design the lots in such a .manner that would avoid a potential ri it -On condition with any units that gill eventually lz�R builtron these lots. This direction was provided as all other residences adjacent to Summit Avenue between East and Etiwanda Avenues either provide for a front -on or side -on condition. The applicant provided an exhibit showing how houses`. -could be plotted on Inrese lots accordingly. (See Exhibit "F "). D. Grading and "echnical Review Committees: The project was reviewed by both Committees and determined, with the recommended conditions of'approval,'o be in conformance with - applicable standards and ordinances. E. Traila Advisory Committee: The project was reviewed b_- the Committee and recommended for approval subject to certain modifications to trail locations (see Exhibit "H "). All recommendations of the Committee have beer, incorporated by the applicant into the project. The proposed trail locations are shown in Exhibit "G." F. East Avenue RealiSgment/Vacation: r This development will he realigning East Avenue westerly to 'provide a four--ay intersection with Sum-nit Avenue. The current East /Summit'' intersection has its north and south le_vs offset approximately 70 feet. The centerline transition, at a Secondary, Arterial design speed, requires about 700 feet, which involves the en-Ire Bast Avenue frontage between Summit Avenue'and Blue Gum r.zve The owner of the "Not a Part" parcel at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Blue Gum Drive has been strongly opposed to the reaitgament.' -The possible use of condemnation to obtain off -site 'gets- of-way for 'the realicmment of East Avenue was conceptually approved by the City G3uncil on May 18, SS88. 3 PLANNING f1ONn=SION VAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13808/7 —rVIS ROMES June 12, 1991 Page 4 In July of 1990, the owner of the "Not ,a Part ",parcel notified the City that he would be willing to replace; ,she existing structures with a new house oriented to the proposed tract if the City agreed to relocate his septic tank, water meter, and electric services aicd to waive all fees. Staff responded that all normal relocation costs associated with the realignment . would be borne by the - developer, including those resulti` '• from condemnation proceedings. The discussion of fee waiverb`- was deferred until prior to finalization of the right -of -way acquisition. Once East Avenue is realigned, the existing straight pavement section south of Summit Avenue and north of Blue Gum Drive will be removed. All existing right- of-way for East r_2enue in exceas of the 44 feet measured from the realigned centerline will be vacate .4.at that time. G. Tree Removal Permit 91 -15: Within project boundaries there are six mature Eucalyptus windrows containing 239 Blue and Red Gum Eucalyptus treen plus one Walnut tree. Exhibit "C" identifies the location of all txeesr' both living and dead. and including tree stumpsl An arborist report was prepared to address the overall - _windrow conditions. Two of the six windrows were not addressed by the arborist report, including the windrows adjacent to both Summit -,snd East Avenues. The windrow adjacent to Summit Avenue is identified for preservation by Figure 5 -'3 of the Stiwanda Specific Plan (See Exhibit "J ") and will be preserved. This windrow contains approximately ten healthy Eucalyptus trees, several dead trees and several stumps. The tract is conditioned to complete Community- Trail improvements on the south side of Summit Avenue which will involve both the trail and the landscaped parkway. Within the Summit Avenue parkwalt, Eucalyptus maculata will be planted to infill_ spaces between existing j Eucalyptus :tees to allow for , the reestablishment and perpetuation of the Eucalyptus windrow. The replacement trees consist of Eucalyptus maculata in 15- gal3on size planted 8 feet ca center. The windrow adjacent to East Avenue cannot be preserved as East Avenue right -of -way improvements necessitate its removsl., to ie Etiwanda Specific Plan calls for Red Gum Eucalyptus, planted 30 feet. on Center in a double row along the wrest side of East Avenue. The arborist report evaluates the windrow condition and f 1 recommends the preservation of 52 Eucalyptus trees. The report addresses only their preservation potential based on their condition, not on the desirability of preserving I l - - j PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13808 /LEEWIS HOMES June 12, 1991 Page 5 Eucalyptus trees in private yards.. The recommendation of h� preservation is made with no regard for lot configuration or- street alignment. The location of most of the 52 trees will conflict directly with the ultiidate development of the project site. Unfortunately, most of these 52 trees are individual specimens scattered throughout the,_ siee making windrow preservation infeasible. Where clusters of trees are found, or especially desirable specimens, W_.aff recommends preserving them pending design review of those lots. Both th= Tree Preservation Ordinan ?? and the Etiwanda Specific Plan allow for the removal of,,,:-Eucalyptus windrows with replacement planting provided as a condition of approval. The Specific Plan establishes a windrow planting requirement of 50 i' lineal feet of new windrow plantings per project acre. Based upon a project acreage of 39.1 acres a total of 1,705 lineal feet of new Eucalyptus windrow will be provided with the development of the tract. The location of required on -site ,ndrows shall be generally guided by a 330 foot by i 660 foot -_rid pattern. On -site windrow plantings consist of'L`ucalyptus mac +_le ±a in 5- gallon size planted 8 feet on center. AdIkL It is apparent that the existing windrows cannot be preserved or effectively ,restored under the proposed project, with a few exceptionu. Staff recommends new windrow plantings and selective preservation as shown `in isul<'ait "I" and as required by the conditions in the attached Resolution. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Part I of-the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist. P.)th affected school districts would be impacted by this project; hence a condition requiring participation in a Mello Roos funding district has been included. in addition, the project proposed the removal of the majority of the on --site Eucalyptus windrows. The arborist report . indicates that only 20 percent of the trees are worthy of preservation. Ps mitigation, the project will be conditioned to replant the windrows per Etiwanda Specific Plan requirements. Therefore, although the project could have a significant effect in these areas, staff found that there will not be a significant s fect in this case because of tte mitigation measures which have been included as conditions nf approval. Ftaff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS. The project is consistent with the General 1 Plan, Development Code, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will riot be detrimental to the public health or safety or cause nuisance or q5 i l PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13808 /hEWIS'HOMES Jx:ne 12, 1991 Page 6 significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed Site Plan, together with recommended Conditions of Approval,'s ='in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code, the Etiwanda'Specific Plan, and City Standards. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing R in The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, the property posted, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of Tentative Tract 13808 through adoption of the attached Resolution. a; Respec 1 suu d, / Brad er O City Planner BB:TG:js i Attachments: Exhibit "A" — Site Utilization Exhibit "B" - Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan " Ex}�ibit "D" - Equestrian. Envelope Plan Exhibit "E" Landscape Plan EXhlibit "F" - Unit Plotting Example' Exhibit "G" - Trails Exhibit "H" - Trails Advisory Committee Comment Sheet Exhibit "I" - Trees Exhibit "J" - Etiwanda.Specific Plan Figure 5 -13 Resolution of Approval LP I) f -= z I Dam r � �h� ✓w' -J - _..= _.sue.. a __ I nw .. � 1, sro .. • ✓✓ .�: Z At". COMW _+. . is ti' 61 'H,T W I � _�. ._�•�' CITY OF CT•��, CUCA►�r ONGA rt'EtvZ. t� PLANLN i�.#SIQN TrrLi:.Trk IMv N EXHIBIT. SCALE: Q t f is • � �7 ...se a. O• nm . I' Ogg, Mue ,. �i •. ,+! �� • •"��A''.* - -- `� -- � f. �, ✓ .ter TB�. ,r`-- -�� -� •`� ., WI I ��Z��K �'rEM: I Off► OF I3A%TCH ; UCAMONGA Tr�T' PLANNING-DIVISION _EXHIBIT. 2 SCALE. '..._... 1fq - r `� =e ITEM. IT CITY OF RIO CUCAMONGA P ION 'ETI LE:, r A EXHIBM SCALE: :4Zll It III L � • !�1_ anus t � i 4 ITEM. IT CITY OF RIO CUCAMONGA P ION 'ETI LE:, r A EXHIBM SCALE: f �7 iy it ITMAAT 1 YJ0 wy OF R TC C ;Y i UCAMONGR - PLANI��'�i�`r D1ViIO:V TM E: Cyr_`j- �t lit it EXi Uff. Jj SCALE: , y T e i1 i L6LENb AIY'Hd1[iL -V!D j" ; wat+m rvuws nern ty ITMAAT 1 YJ0 wy OF R TC C ;Y i UCAMONGR - PLANI��'�i�`r D1ViIO:V TM E: Cyr_`j- �t lit it EXi Uff. Jj SCALE: 7` C _ � � et '� +4 /� �� •d � a �M` it L J •• '� L • �i��ittaa t y � .t. - r _ n...... <r'•" -- �',�.' ice." � � � 1, _4.. rrEM: CITY ' CSC UCAMONGA �TiiE: t PLANMN4j DMSioiv � N EXMIT; SCALE: �f _ l i - .> - - - - -- = JL � iaaa "yyy Ht J. C7 r , � j�• yyy��- i f OF AAI�1'CTl PTEM: „OUCAMONGA PLANNING , MSION �y,� TTTLB: 6tAkll IW�i- N EXHdBU: SCALE: i { i ��s :.sue �.,•..��,�� r � {., --,r.� �: l•1 �.` .i � T' °y �• `-,�'� �i,11 ;.�,_ , j1 � is � _::� _ �• CITY OF F. �&C._fd�_.CUCAMONGA PLANMJNG F.fiV SION i J �{; i• r • � .J � %.. ____ -__� , "J1M'.- -__•r I ,.( mµ_1 { � �: „' ' � , \ (- `d 1�' •'fry 1-:: � ' i I IT - ' ITEM: o 1 OF RAiT IIC ;w liOAMONG PLANMN4 i3i�Ti�ION T i'i'LE: cs EXIMIB V .SCALE: ,r t I CITY OF RA F4i ,„CUCAMONGA PLANNING KCIN I s i smock r S f a � PLANT PALETTE. I Sams e..nnNaa K....r sun•wn � T } ^- ,•riey:. aaol.y iwa.wa •ornu.:y . .erevrra.•..�.u1aa.•an.aen,. maraeauarwwccy.e•.ua In.eum.�mrWw.vrt.canl. IIN. MYOI.u.OelbM. Nyry YMCII.y6C.Yw. NyIYOy NWyinH.I•iC.�N 6ar"ryCNya r11TtYrM KW 1pYR•y(�'i.21�o M7ti0L'01LI.x IstyJ ti..itll.0ily ly.. tluRlly NOTE• �ryrr ao nyR CAI lylrl. mm: ' OF >�CF4 ,� UCAMONG:. PLAN&UN I� J1 dG'1�� r eE: N EJ{l XaBIT: SCALE: Eli i! s saer't M - " CI T Y OF iWdIff6l ucAMONGa PLANi�7Ii d-b SIQ1�i T�Ti.E: • 1, it ' " N E HIBM SCALE: f f i� ,. .VFW' • r 1�" Y!u � �a 3 MOM 01( OF RA-IVCHM,CUCAMONGA t• _ .o •r..r n...rswa.e..n s % y � rte• _ R� ��.. 1 ,. i P%AI1 NQI r Df�li$ION TTiLE: EXH[BTT: r' SCALE: C, WNDFOW PLACEMENT 60,4AY for T i;012 � e .i :l• mn.o,., >m�r...e. b.�m.r,., F/ � "-�LI,E�~� _. � ° ''e.,; '. .. ,. 0.. NEIGHB�HHOODENTHY. .•.. ••. n. {�: {.:COMfP.UiTY cNTRY •a[oa. I cl—f Y OF I3t::A19/IOI91G EXriB$Tc SC,�LE r T11SLL nl[[[T �) LOCAL STPEETSCAPE e.y -�.• JtiT { 3 e t. +.. t ...,i ,ice/ d� EAST AYEMM giAEETSCJIPE. I cl—f Y OF I3t::A19/IOI91G EXriB$Tc SC,�LE r h. j! .. e� .r ti! �i�.--- •�J+ ---" � CND 'e{ �' i ; - j' ` 1 tl i � ��'' � .r n✓ , ccr � t� . calve..: I i '�! ixj OF F Ci O',=CAMONu•L � - PLANN' ING I� JYSION ec N j EXHIBFI': SCA E: B04E1.ON.1DVH1 'dVWS3.tUVVA- r4lmvx rf ` j1 IP -A TFA S ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET Project Description: Tentative Tract 13808 - >Iewi s Vp -,mes A residential -ubdivision of 49 single family lots on 3 ..1 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Summit Avenue and East Avenue. Comments: 1. Twenty foot community trails are proposed along the north, south and west boundaries of the tract consistent with the General Plan. 2. A fifteen foot local Trail is proposed from the community trail at the north tract boundar- to Blue Gum Drive and from Winchester Court to the proposed community trail along the south tract boundary. 3. An eighteen foot trail easement is located in an east /west direction as part of the bordering Tract 12462 north of SV Castle court. This trail would connect with the props,. .i north / south community trail which crosses Blue Gum Drive and connects with the north /south local trail east of Shohone Place. A fifteen foot wide local trail is proposed across Stone castle Court for access to Lots 20 and 21 from the community trails,_' 5. A fifteen foot wide trail easement is proposed from Winchester Court along t',e rear of lots one through eight to a variable width equestrian and leadscape easement along the west side of the new alignment of Eant Avenue Action: I. Conm:trnity trails should be constructed as proposed along the north and south tract bounda.,i-ies from the east boundary of tract 12462 to East Avenue a f n and r �n Summit, along the w,.st .tract boundary, continuing south bet4e a Lots 14 and 15, to the community trail at the southerly tract boundary. i!. The 'ocal trail between Lots 11 and 12, 20 and 21 and between Lots 25 and 26 should be deleted. 3. Norte /South local trails should be provided arc the rear of the lots between Kincaid Court and Artesian Court at.-' between Shoshone Peace and Stone Castle Court. The later trail would continue across Blue Gum Drive between Lots 11 and 18 to the coinmui ty trail at the south tract boundary. 4. A local trail should be provided at the rear of Lots 1 through 8 from Winchester Court to East Avenue, ft �J lfo3 � I 5. An additional local trail Amok should be provided along the rear of _*Lots 9 and 10 ' behi nd the East Avenue wall, connecting the local ty trail at the rear of lots 1 through 8 with the community trail at the southern tract boundary. l 6. An additional local trail should be located between Lots 2 and 3 i *nnnecting the- trail at the rear of Lots I through, 8 with 8iue Gum Drive and the no,thlsouth trail bet;deen Kincaid Court and Artesian Court. 7. A local trail !.�ouid be coistructed bebInd the East Avenue wall at the rear of Lots 47 through 4:, north bf the "not a part" existing lot, to the proposed community trail at $ummit'Avenue. 8. An additional 12 foot wide trail easement should be pr�iided along° the south side of 'the,prnaosed 18 foot easement at the south boundary of Tract 12462. 9 An additional 15 foot wide trail easemert should be provided at the rear of Lots 20 througt^ 22 follot4ing tM westerly tract ' boundary to Blue Gum Drive, along'thv-,side of Lot 20 adjacent to Blue Gum,, Drf ve and turning south al odn she west side of !.at 19 connecting the additional 12 foot easement at south side of tract 12462 with the community trail at the south tract boundary. 10. Trail fencing should not be invtaIied at the. outside po,s ion of Amok trails abutting existing or proposed trails in. oK:er tl ,tr6YPInt "split trails ". U. Local trails should-'be left open at connections with streets for equestrian service access. 12. Houses should be setback a minimum distance of 10 feet from trails occurring at side yards. 13. All trails should be constructed according to City standards, 2 ;F= jib h uj IU ui iL if it gum � tD —fir- 4-_ � � X214 _ �• �_ � It' 1� �} Jm !— s , if - �S .tea -.�.+_ � � ti• • - - -� 24 Olive Gro i T -7/ / mw a � vj� " MA ft - 1^ 1 /f a 'RXISTII STREET TREES TO BE PRESERA ' !existing Windbrea a Existing Tress itiNr Oak• Foothill blvd S.P'. - -.......,, � % I � Ordbame 424, Effective 10119!30 AMW / W L title figure, a - y STREET TREE r PRESERVATION 5� 1 3 CITY OF R;�QQ �-�(ry�H i T AM ON CA PTEIvic t3 PLANN— .TNO- IiIVYSTON ifi7i.E:- ,.f j,; ► . 777 ! EXHIBIT: SCALE: �— Li s� U RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PT TIMING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13808, RELATED ,TREE ArZ --VSL PERMIT NO., 91 -15, AND THE VACATION OF r PO'T'ION OF EAST AVENUE, A'RESYDENTIAT> SUBDIVISION OF 4S aINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 34,1 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SUMMIT AND EAST AVENUES IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, (1 -2 DW-OLL214G UNITS PER ACRE) dF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC :4iLA AND M7"KXNG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN; 225- 181 -04, 06, Q'*, 08, 42 and 43 and 325 - 201 -28. A. Recitals. (i) Lewis Homes has filed acs application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13808 as described in the title of this Reso?',ution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." =- (ii) On the 12th of June 1991 the Planning Camnttseion of the City of "'=ho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application anu concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Fesolution. NOW, TY'SREFORE, it is hereby found, dotermined, and .�:aeo: by the Planning Commission of the 9ity of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commiseit _h eby specifically finds that all of tie facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and aorreot. 2. Bated upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced puli_ic hearing c ;June 12, 1991, including written and ora'k staff reports, together with publit testimony, this commission hereby specif ::.ally finds as follows: (a) The application applies to proper'y located At the southwest corner of Summit and cast Amenues, with a w.z 7et fr -- tags of 825 iset along Summit Avenue and a street frontage fae� 31ong East Avenue, and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the oite contains single family homes, to the -17,h are single family home` and vacant property, to the east are singld family hcaes and vacant property, and to the west are siriSSe family homes and hooves under m „atruction; and PLANNINCZ, .'MKXSSION REP? LUTxbn 'NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13308 -- CIS HOMES June 12, 1991 Rage 2 (c) The proporal to develop 49 single family unite on 34.1 acres -: land is consistent with thq Very Low land use designation of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presesnted to this .^_ommission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 i0ove, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: `a1 That tentative tract iz consistent with tt. General 1�1+�n, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements the tentative tract in consistent with tho General Plan, Development Ccdej� a:sd specific plane, and (c) The site is physically suitable for t;ta type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to caus:a substnitial environmental, damage and avoidable injury to humane and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tenth We tract is not 11.kely to catzge serious puhlic health problems; and (f) The design of the tentati -t tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, noes of record, for access throug h )r use o! the property within the proposed ar`^d viroioa. 4. This " -=oL asion hereby finds aw ,airti;fiox that the project has been reviewed and >analdered in complimAce with the California Snvdronmental Quality Act of 1990 and, further, this Commisa: >cn hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Bazsi: � :n the findings an& conclusions set forth in pa-ragraphs 1, 2, It, and 4 2a.::F -; this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every vcrndlticn set forth biUm and in the Attached Standard Conditions attached herova and incorporated herein by thr-e referen ^e. Plrnnin(t =5ivision: (1) The perimeter wail adjacent to Sumosit lvasiue small be designed compatible with, the existing wall directly tc the west (Tract 12462). The wail design shall be shown on this Landscape sand Irri .4htion plan and rhall be subject to City, f Planner review and akpzoval prior to issuance of building hermits. I Co i'� m' 0701-02 0 JUNE 12; 1991 P.C. AGENDA o ( 5 of 7 � E AMON e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13808 -- LEWIS HOMES June 12, 1951 Page 3 (2) The design �f the East. Avenue wall )',Iiall be consistent with Figu.,e 5 -28A of the Etiw €nda Specific Plan. The wall design sham. be shown on the Landscape and Irrigation Plan and shall be subject to 'City Planner review and approvaN prior to issuance of building permits,. (3) Tree Removal Permit 91 --15, is hereby approved for the removal of all trees, including stumps, on the project site, except those trees described below: (a) The existing windrow along Summit Avenue shall be preserved per Figure 5"13 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and in Accordance with* Rancho•,;jLM .xcamonga Municipal Code Section 19.08. (b) The following trees identified in the arborist reports shall be preserved in places r i Tree # Try idh in Arborist Report Lot 0 2, 3 n 4.;� _ 1 9, 10 12, 13 2,% 15,, 16 20 17 18 19, 20 26 21, 22 27 yl 32 32-45 2 46-52 10 (4) Trea Removal Permit 91 -15 shall be valid for a period of. 90 days„ subject to extension by the j City Planner. The 50 days shall star` from the date of Issuance of rough grading permits. (5) New on -site windrow planting shall be provb('ud at a rate of 50 lineal feet per acre. Based on a project of 34.1 acres, a minittitan of 5,705 lineal feet of on -ette Z�calyptus windrow shall he provided. The location of required on -site windrows shall be in " ^eordance with Exhibit °I" of the June 12, 1991,•'Planning commission staff report. one -site windrow plantings shall C PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TEiNTATIVE TRACT 13808 - LEWIS HOMES June 12, 1991 Page consist of Euc,lyptuB maculate in 5- gallon size plaited 8 feet on center. , On -site wim-1rows shall' be shown on the Landscape and irrigl�tion `lan and shall be subject. to City Piaaner, review and approval prior to building pe ml_f `l issuance. New planting shall be completed" prior ',o occupancy, (6) Eucalyptus waculata shall be planted in the Summit Avenue parkway to infill spaces between existing Eucalyptus „trees. Sturgs shall be removed. The repiacement trees shall be a minimum 15- gallon size planted 8 feet on ranter. The trees shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and shall be subject to City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to iosmance of any permits. In addition, Eucalyptus %..aculata shall be planted along riot Avenue per the Etiwanda`Specific Plan. (7) Care shall be exercised by all individuals, developers, and contractors working near preserved trees no that no damage occurs to such tress. All construction shall preserve and protect the health of treeo to remain, and new trees plat, :sd to replace those removed in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Hunicipal code Section 19.08. (8) Prior to accepting a deposit oh the property, the developer shall require �)ach prospective buyer to sign a .ritten.notice of any existing windrows or trees required by these conditions to be preserved in place. Said disclosure shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation, (9) No construction, including utilities, that disrupts the root system shall be permitted. As a guideline, no trenching, or other construction activity, should occur - within 13 feet of the tree trunk. In particular, care shall be exercised by the de�relopar and contractors in designing and constructing street improvements along Summit Avenue. (10) The two north - %;uth Local Feeder trails below Summit Avenue shall be connected to the Community Trail along Summit Avenue per City Standard Ar?Awing No. 1007 (step- through). R36 'A ; PLANNING COMMISSiON'RESOLUTION NO. ENTATIVE TRACT 13808 LEWIS HORSES June 12, 1991 Page 5 v IL /f Likewise, the; Local Feeder trails on Lots 10, 17, 18, and 19 shall connect to the southerly Community Trail per City Standard Drawing No. 1007. (11) The entrances to all Community Traile- S-rom Blue Gum Drive and East Avenue shall be constructed per City Standard Drawi -, No. 1006A (vehicle gate with side step- througl: access). (12) Trail fencing shall not be installed at the outside portion of trails sabutting existing or proposed trails in order to prevent "spit trails. "! (13) Local Feeder trails shall be left open at connections with streets and constructed with drive approaches for equestrian service access. (19) Houses shall be setback. a minimum distance of 30 .feet from trails occn-- ing,at side yards. (15) All Community trails ani` Local Feeder trails shall be constructed .concurrently with the ntreet improvements. (16) The Community Trail t.ar£ace, along Summit Avenue shall continue straight through to the East Avenue intersection. Engineering Divisions (1) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future unlergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunicx�tions and electrical) on the opposite aides of Summit Avenue and East Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to recordation of the Final Map. The fee shall be one -half the City's adopted unit amount times: (a,) The length from `the center of Summit Avenue to the south project boundary, leas the "Not A Part" frontage; plus (h) The length from the center of East Avenue to the west project boundaty. (2) Construct Summit Avenue full width, including street lights, along the entire project frontage wits a transition to the existing PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Nov. TENTATIVE TRACT 13ROS - LEWIS- HOMES; June 12, 1991 Page 5 pavem;.t west of the project's west boundary for a 40 mph deoicn speed. Off -site raiirvalke and parkway landscaping may be deferred until developmert of the adjacent property. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement for improvements north of the centerline, from future redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite Ride n£ the street. (3) Construct East Avenue as followers ' (a )' Full, width from Summit Ave- -ue to the project's south boundary,' including sidewalk, street lichts,,and street trees on 'both sides of the street. The developer ".J may request- reimbursement - - agreements for improvements east of the centerline, from future redevelopment as it occurs on the `opposite side of the street, not otherwise I`�re"ibureed as specified - below. Iy (b) Reconstruct the exist ix- section to ultimate Secondary Arteria`'' standards at a 36 foot "backbane" width'from the south WJ project boundary to highland Avenue. The full 32-foot half secfaan, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees;, and street; lights, shall be 'completed on the west side between the south project boundary and the "existing improvements on the GTE site. Proride transitions for a 50 mph design speed, developer may request reimbursement agg.ssmsnts for Sff -site _ improvements -nut otherwise reimouveed ae specified below from future development: as it occurs. south of the south projedt kv?undary= Depending on the results of,'the I- 15/SR30 interchange project under development, this condition may be modified by the City Engineer to be in coordination with the State: project. ('c:; Construct a complete intersection of East and Highland Avenues and install traffic signals as approved by the City Engineer. Depending on the results of the I- 15 /SR30 interchange project under development, this condition may be modified by the City Engineer to be in coordination with the State project. KJA �T PLAiWING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRnCT 13808 a LEWIS HOMES iI June 12, 1991 Page 7 is i 16 (d) Construct a complete intersection of East and Summit Avenues with transitions to meet existing pavement east on Summit (40 mph design speed) and north on Eaat Avenue (SO mph design speed). (e) The developer shall be eligible for fee credits against and reimbursement from the Transportation Development Fee for the portion of the improvxmants determined by the City Engineer to be of supplemental size, length or;'6apac3.ty over that needed for the impacts of this development, in conformance with ordinance No. 445. (4) The City will notify property owners with liens for the construction of portions of East and Summit Avant' in to participate with the developer in those construction casts, per l:.en file numbers 2, 44, and'78. (5) Install "No Stopping Any along the East and Summit Avenue frontages. (6) Etiwanda /San Sevaine Area Master Plan Storm Drains: (a) Construct lines Sk, 51, and 5m in Summit and East Avenues to meet the existing master plan facility north of Highland Avenue. Redesign the lines referenced on the Grading Plan, for a Q100 and to stay within the realigned East Avenue. Install catch basins on both siden of Summit and East Avenues. (b) Construct portions of Master Plan system 4, in 24th Street, sufficient to protect the site from upstream flows as determined by the final drainage report approved by the City Engineer. (c) The developer shall receive credit for the j cost of conatticting permanent ultimate facilities up to the amount of the drainage ifee and shall be reimbursed for excess costs from future fee collection, in accordance with City policy. 1 PLANNING COMMISfION RESOLUTION NO. '17.NTATIVE TRACT 13808 - LEWIS HOMES .Tune 12, 1991 Z�age 8 (7) Extend the local storm drain in Blue Gum Drive up Shoshone Place to meet the pipe from 'Tract 12462. (S) Overhead utility service lines which cross East Avenue shall,, be placed undergzound prior to completing tLa East Aven+xe street improvements. (9) Remove the existing pavement where East Avenue is realigned north of Blue Gum Drive and vacate the existing right -of -way which exceeds 44 feet east of the realigned centerline. (10) Construct tull street and parkway improvements across the "Not A Part'. parcel fronting East Avenue north of Blue Gum Drive, including a theme wall located outside the intersection line -of- sight. (11) Remove the existing drive approaches on East Avenue for the "Not A Part" parcel north of Blue Gum Drive and replace them with a driveway an to Kincaid Court. (12) r,,ot "A" shall be dedice.ed to the adjacent "Not A Part" parcel. A lot line adjustment to 6ombine hot "A' with the "Not A Part" parcel shall be recorded concurrently with the Final MAO. (13) Construct a 10 -foot wide Community trail along the south project boundary and a 20 -foot wide Community trail ruiusing worth and south from the intersection of Blue Gum Drive and Winchester Court. 'Provide corner cutoffs at the intersection of the two Community Trails and trail crossing approaches where they intersect Summit and East Avenues. (14) The concrete swale north of the Community Trail along the south tract boundary shall be located in a private drainage easement. The easement, shall specifically accept drainage from the Community Trail. (IS) A separate .Community Trail plan per ._City Standards shall be provided subject to app .Leval of the city Engineer for the two interior Community Trails along the south tract boundary and running north and south from the Blue Gum /Winchester Court intersection. PLANNING COMMISSION PIMOLUTIOM NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13805: LEWIS HOMES June 12, 1991 Page 9 5. The Secretary to ,hie Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Boller, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of ,Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and.,adcpted by the Planning Commission of the City Gf Rancho Cucamonga, at a re "lar meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of June 1991, toy the follcCxng vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: f I >i 4TV V, DEPARTMENT OF MAN0060 DUCANCH04% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT f ROJECT #: S 113JECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: .............. tow, Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (i'tb) 9896.1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWiNG CONDIVONS: A. Time Limits 1. Approval shall expire, unless cxtend&J by the Planning Commission, If building para is are not lssuedora.!;proveduse has notcarnmencedwithM 24 monthstromthedateotapprovai. 2. CrevalopmenViDesign Review shall be approved prior to / 3. Approval of TentatfvA Z, °f ivo. is granted subject to the approval of I e� 4. ThedeYebpershaitcommenoe,)..'-4fr Ionia, arxfoonsumrrretaorcauaetobecommenced, � participated in, or coi~.summated, a Metfo`Pt',)s Community Facilities District (CFD) for the i Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dlst xtto finance corstrucWn and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The :tfaiion shag be located, designed, and built to all speclticaflons of the Rarretan Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shalt become the District's property upon clompfetIon. The equipment shalt be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable jaws and reputations. The CFD shalt be formed by the Disrict and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to ro=dation of the final map c,r the issuance of bullding permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shag consent to, or participate In, the establishment of a Mello-Roes Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, it any school die M,. has previously established such a Continually Facilities District, the applicant shag, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing DWrict prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of buildirng permits, whiohevercomes first. Further. If the affected school district has notformed a Meth -Roos Community Facilities District withintwelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shard be deemed null and void. SC -2/91 Iona K3& S=ift[ . _J. —J_— _ , 1 —j--j- -j--j— This condition shall be waived H the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered Into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts Be a rosult of this project. i 6. Prior to recordattion of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is _J I. valved, writte:l certiflcati fromthe affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Cavelopment.. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days priorto final map approval Lithe case of subdivision orpriarloissuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Develcpamant o� 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans wl-4,h .Jr.! include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the P ing D' ion, th conditions contained herein, Wt, Development Code regulations, and ItiDt?ri'1 Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business &ctivity wing wm -iced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfWion of the C 'inner, 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not comm9nes until suchtime as a,' Iniform Building Code and State Firo Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prto 'to occupar cy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga fire PrWiction District and the Building and Safety P Division to show compliance. The building snail be lrwpecied for compliance prior to occupancy. Adak d. Revised site plans and building elevations Incorporating all Cot -Aions of Approval shall be - _/_,_/ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to tssfrarw of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, trrigat!on, and street Improvement plans shall becoorcv -tad for --1—�— consistency priorto Issuance of any pem tts (rTh as grading,tme oemuval, encro; �,hment, building , etc.), or prior to final map epproval in the ca.. of a custom lot subdivhvion, or approved use has commenced, whichever corms first. Approval 6. of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development J�J Code, all other applicable City Ord;m x:es, and appecabie Community Plans or Specific Plans In effect at the Vine of Building Permit issuvow. 7. A detailed on -site fighting plan sh€If be reWa+ed and approved by the City Planner and Sheriff's Department (989.6511) prior to the issuarr-a of building penTft. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shieldtng so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. —8. If no centralized trash receptacles are prWeded, all trash pick -up shall be for Individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacles) are required and shall meet City standards, The final design, locations. -J—J and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. _ * _ 10. All ground - mounted utility appurtenances such as transformer- AC condensers, etc., shall ___/� be located out of public view and adequately screened th". ;vi use of a combination of I concrete or masonry walls, bearing, and/or landscaping to Vla satisfaction of the City Planner SC - 2/61 2 cf 12 1?3 11. Street names shall he submitted Mir City Plannnr review and ipproval in accordance with the adopted' eat Naming Policy prior to apprmsi of the.!:aai map. 12. All building numbers and irxdiuidual units shat! be Identif led in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and :need control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Plannerreview and approval priorto approval and recordation of the FinalTract Map Gnd prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developershall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &Rs) shall not prohloitthekeeping of equine animalsW .- zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lotow .rsInsub�6 1visbnsshallhavetheoptionofkeepingsaidanlmalswithoutthenecessi ty of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendm3nts to the CC &Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC &Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and EnginL wing Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be. recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Enginuer. 16. Allparkways, open areas, andiandscapingshall bepermanentrymaintalned bytheproperty owner, homeownars' asscciation, or other means acceptakle to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City En¢ineerrevrlew and Allillik approval prior to issuance of building permits. Soar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that earl. lot C.: dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of s solar energy syVem. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision wh;O shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Developmora Code Section 17.08.Ob0 -G.2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall bo developed and maintained in accord m with the Historic Landmark Afteration Permit No. . Any furtherwdific*itiorts to the site induding, but rot Un*eei to. exterior afteraticrts andlor interiorafteretionswhichaffe cttheexteriorofthebuildingsorstnklures ,removalof landmark trees, demoftion, relocation, reconstruction of buildings oz structures, orchanges to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Vistoric Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimtrang pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems as demonstrated to be of equivalent dapacity and efficiency. All swimming poosInstalled at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building purrs and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shalt have the front, side and t,,_ elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. SC - 2/91 3 or 12 % � _J—J- J—! _ _J__l__ J___ J -1 ___J_/ J___ j -3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official .- -'view and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances, Including air conditioners and other root mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be;ncluded in building plans. >isow D. Parking and Vefhiauldir Access (indicate detalts on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12 -inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development toconnerutdwetlings/ units+'twildings With open spaces/ I plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striper! per City standards and all driveway aisles, j entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers it driveways are less than 16 feet in depth from back of sidewalk 5. The Covenants, Comfiflonsand Restrictions shag restrk;tthestorag6of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the prrnc pat source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on Interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fro Protection District reviewandapprovalpriorto Issuance ofbuilding permits. E Landscaping (for publicly maintained IareftWe sraaa, refer to Section N.) 1. A deteiled landscape and irrigation plan, including 3" planting and model home iamiscap Ing in the case of residential development. shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and subs; dedfor City Plamar review and approval priorto the Issuance of building permits or prior final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision. L 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier InaccordancewiththeLfun iCodeSection19.08. 110, and sonrotedonthe grading plans. The location of those tress to be preserved In place and new locations fortransplaraed trees shall be shown oaghedetalledlarrdscapeplans. The applicant shag follow all of the arborfst 's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Aminimumof treespergrossam.co prisW olMotoitarringsizes.srMbeprovided within thepMJea: %- 45- inch box orlarger, %- 36- Inch box orlargar, % - 24- inch box or larger, % -1 S ga9oq; and % - S gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shag be specimen size trees - 24- inch box or larger. S. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every twee Parking stalls, sufficient to shade SOT* of the parking area at solar noon on August 2, SC - 2 /91 4 or 12 JJ- rl_.1 —J--J- -j—j— i °noise tio�r.(�4b/ '. 6. Trees shall be planted Inari.we lf public view adjacent to and along structures ata rate ofone i8Q1 etion Dater, tree per 30 linear feet of building. — 7. All private slope banks 5 feetor less in vertical height and of 5:1 orgreaterslope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground ooverfnr erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent Irrigation system to b- installed by the developer prior to occupancy. S. Allprivatesk as Inexcessof5feet,but lessthan8feel invsrtical height and of2 .1orgreater ---� --�- slope shall b6 landscaped and Irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance ss follows: one 15 -gallon or larger size treR per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks In excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also Include one :: -gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area, Trees and shrubs shall be phi ited in staggered atusters to soften and vary slope plane, Slops planting required by this section shalt include a permanent irrigation systemto be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. �9. For single family resioen'dal deve;oprrlent, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu oustymaintaiped in a healthy and thriving condition by ft developeruntii each Indhiidualunit is so'l and occupied by the buyer. Norto releasing occupancytorthose units. an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are In satisfactory condition. 10. Fcr multi- family residential and non - residential developmerit, property cwnens are respor - slole for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as ce planted areas within the public right-of -waw A9 landscaped arses shall be kept irb a from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive °egular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shaC be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage, 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and for _) . This requirement shaft be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, wafts, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated forconsistency with any parkway landscaping pfanwhich maybe required by the Engineering DivWbn. 13. Special landscape features such.ass mounding, aftuviat rack, specimen size trees, meander- trig sidewalks W. horizontal change), and gbensiif ied landscaplrig, Is required along 14. Lanisc*ng and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-ot -way on the perimeter of this project ar as shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 15. All waI13 shall beprovidei1withidecorativetrealment. If located Inpubliamaintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. „,e� 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and _/._/ approval prior to issuance of building permits. These crkeda shall e'lcourags the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 17. Landscaping and in anion "I be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xedscap8 as defined in ;Chapter 19.16 of the Aanclio. Cucamonga Municipal Code. SAC - 2/91 5 of 12� F. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and notapart of this approval. Any signs pa!,osed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance are, shall rer;r'• separate application and approvatby the Ptonning Division prior Wnst--illationofany signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program forth.'s development shall be submitted for City Planner reviewand approvalpriorto issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sfgn(s) shall be provided We apartment, coW)rminium, or townhomes prior to occupancy and shalt require separate application and approval by the Planning 1 Division pdorto issuance of building permits. I G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prosp", lve buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as datemrned by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of tte City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a rash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway prrject In a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to wing a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval rviorto the Issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of imerior noise attenuationtobelow45CNEL , the building materials and construction techniques provided. and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies 1. EmergencysecondaryaccessshaNbepmvfdedinaccordancewkhRancWCucamongat tf Protection District Standards. 'f 2. Emergency asaessshalibepm Aded, maintenancefreeandclear .aminimumof26feetwide at all times during construction in aot ordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. _z 3. 4. Z5. SC 2/91 Prior to Issuance of bulkling permits for combustible construction. evidence shall be submittedto the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Districtthat temporary watersupptyfor fire protection Is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. The applicant shaft Contact the U. S. Postal Service to dttsmlkte the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead stricture for mail boxes with adequate "Ing. The Mal location c" the mail boxes and the design of the -ierhoad structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, inciudi% all supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Envi&- . ental Health and submitted to the Building Officfaf prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building pem its. 8of12 i R / / Q"npledm Late, ._/--/ ___f —/ _._I _ — I -1 _/_J `--J-J E'reiett Yo:�1 � i v"�' Comoteaon Due, APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) $89.1863, FOR OMPLIANCE WiTH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Site Development 1 The applicant shall comply wkn the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other appiicablo caries, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of r"tive permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and appiicabie handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits fora new residential dwelling un#(s) or major addition to existingunit(s) the applicant shall paydeveiopmentfeesat the established rate. Suchfees may include, but are not limed to: Cky Beautiiloation Fee, ParkFee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Perm? and Plan Checidng Fees, ai?d School Fees.. 3. Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new commercial or Industrial development or addition to an existirvI development, the applicant shall pay development fees ai the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to. Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checidng Fees. 4. Street addresses shall be provicled bythe Building Official, aftertract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of buildinapemoils. J. Existing Structures t 1. Provide compliance with tha Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire - resistiveness ol existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to cCmply with Correct building and zoning regulations for the Intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities sh& ibe removed, filled andforcappedtocompiywiththe Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Wrtli g Coda. 4. Underground on -site utilities are b be located and shown on building plans submitted for building permit application. K. Grading I. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Unikorm Building Coda, City Grading Standards, and accepted gracing practices. The final graft plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved gratrn plan. —,---*2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of CnIffomia to perform uch work, 3. The development rs located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soli Disturbance Permit ISrequirddPleasecontaMSanSaffm ftCounlyDepm mentofAgricuhurest(714) 387.2111 forpennit application. Doarmentatlonot such permit shallbe submitted tothe City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. —/--J— --J--% I -J___- —J—J 4. A geolotlical report shbN be prepared by a qualified erginear or geologist and submitted at JJ the time of application forgradirg plan dv& 11 S. Thefinal grading plans shall be completed and app=94, rtortoissuanceofbuildingpermits. SC -3141 ltfft2 A/0 6. As a custom -lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water Prat are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, are to tea delineated and recordf,110 the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c.On -site drainage improvements, necessary fordewatering and protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for constry„ -lion upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows enterfng, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division *Yorapproval prior to issuance of building art grading pamrts. (This may be on an Incremental or composite basis.) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 leet in vertical height ,`tall be seeded with nstive grasses or planted with ground aaverfor erosion rontrol upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigatian system shall be prukled. This requirement does not release the apnl'icanvdeveloper from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.06.040 !of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE ENGINEERINO DIVISION, (714)9WIIN2, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L Cedlcation and Vehicular Access I. Rigftts-of -way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseas, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans andior tentative map. Private 9asements for non- public facilities (cross -lot drainage, Walfeedertmils, etc.) shag be reserved as shown on the plans andlor tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the folowiing rVits -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerlina): total foot on total feet on _ Iota: feet on total feet On 3. An irrevocable1 3ferofded'icationfor - footwideroadway easement shall J —t made for all private streets or dives. / a. Nqn-vehicular access, shabe de aa. tit �n "'git%for the following staff its: s 5. Rec t access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the snap or peror to the issuance of bu'Wing permits, where no map is involved. SC - 4/81 8 of i3 e4-3 Completion lhie: .—/--J- -J--J- 1 . -J__l — _J J —I I I- I--/- N'..T h 6. Private drainage easements forcross•lotdrainage shall be provided and shall be delineated SsnPleuun Dim, or noted on the final map. -- 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10 -foot minimum buildirg restriction area on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain t :h t foD wing language: Uwe hereby dadAmte to the City of Rancho Cuca=: -4a the right to prohibit the construction , f (residential) buildings (or otherstructures) within those areas designated on the map as ta:i1ding restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the ;C &Fi's. 8. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shalt be qul'tclaimed or delineated on the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right -of- -way shall be dedicated to ttta City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10. Additional street right- of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured irom the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street`tree maintenance easement she f be provided. 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required:..( -site property interests necessary to construct the required public Improvemenn, and N he/she should fall to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City aequiresthe properly interests required fortheImprovements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all cruets Incurred by the City j to acquire the off -site property interests required inconnecdc— Iwhhe the subd sion,Security for a portion of these costs shall be In the form of a cash deposit ;n the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer. at deveiopees .. - rye wiser shall have been approved by the Ctty prior to oamniencerrierit of the M. Street Improvgments 1. All Public improvements ( Interior streets, drafliage facilities, commi!nNy trails, naseos, land=ped areas, etc.) shown on the plans ancl/ortentattoa map shay 50 constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shalt ImliM, but are not limited to, curb and { gutter. AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, Street iglus, and imet trees. 2. A minimum of 28- foot wide pavement, within a i0 -foot wide dedicatec nghit- of-way shall be s/ constructed for WI half - section streets. 3. Constrict the following perimeter street irr11)(0 .rtie:its including, but not limited to: I SMECrisTAa >~.rxs I ac_ I SIDE I nRMI MILEMI ME= I a .moo ,..... . LJ W - 2/81 S ofi2 —J--J- --J- I —J- -J r!_1 Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will 4e determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be airvilinearper STD. 304. (d) If so marked, an in -ifbu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4- Improvement plans and construction: -- a. Street improvement plans including street ter' aced street lights, prepared by a regis- tered Civic Engineer, shall be oubmitted to;v + )roved tty the City Engineer, Security shall be posted and- an agreementexecutr , the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Cfty Attorney guaranteeing complotion of the public and/or private street Improve- ments, priorto final map approval orttri Issuance of building permits, ts ' richeveroccurs J11-.4. b. Prior to any worts being performed In public right -0bway, fees shall be pad and a construction pefmit shall be obtained from the City E.tgineor's Office in amdion to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping iking, traffic, street name signing, and Interconnect conduit shall be instaHed a s. ";faction of the City EnglneRr. d. Signalcondut, xes shall be Installed on any rewconstrctlonorreccrstruction of major, si - ,idar, - oilector streets which lntersetA with other major, secondary or collector str„ is for future traffic signals. Pull loxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at3 feet vilsideofBCR ,ECRoranyotherlocationsapproved Whe City Engineer. Notes: (1) All pull bcxWz, shall by No. 6 unless *therwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3 -Inch galvanized steel with pulfrope. s. Vl418eI chair ramps shall bo Installed on all four Corners of intersectic"s per Gig Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads rekr.;king construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate drtLars&,— 9constnrdion. A street ciosureilem maybe required. Acash deposit shall be provift to saver the cost of grading and Mving, which shag be refunded upon compleWn of the canstnxtibn to lire satisfaction of Ve City Engineer. g. Concentrated & sir +age flows shOW cross si'dewalcs. Under W,5walkdrains shall be installed to Chi Standai ds, except for single famay, lots. h. Handicap access ram, design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. I. Street rutmes shall be appro4ed by the City Plannerpriorto submittal forfirU plan check. S. Street improvement plans per City Standards for am prWme streets shag be pruv ded for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the pri. vate streets, fees shall be paid and aonstnrctlon permits shag be obtained from the City Engineer's C,fice in addition to any other permlis raGuired. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gafbn size or larger, shall be installed per City StaWards in accordance with the CIVS street free program. i A)4/t5 Stn - 2/91 10 of 12 ___!_.J _/_/_ _J_ _J Amok ___/_!_ Vp _1. 1 _/_J_ J_J.r Jam_ 7. Intersection line of she designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. Aft KV a. On ceilecior or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections. including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obs-tructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeabliity improved, usually by moving the 2 +/- closest street treason each side awayfromthe streetand placed in a street tree easement. .?• A pe tit a!i ob mined rom ALTS for any work within the following right-of -way: _ G �9. All public improvements on the following streets shall operationally mplete prior to the Issuance of building permits: 6ymwd All - N. Public Maintenance Amas 1"`� 1. A separate sat of landscape and irrigation plans per Er+ginwrbig Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for rewow -?�#d approval prior to final map approval c,r issuance of building permits, whichever ri+rs s first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseas, easements, trails,„ :t ier areas are required to be annexed into the IIndpeape Mafrpenaftce District:, t . P e - I rr _ 11 ( 4ArA OT " ft WAAK (A %t,t,Z W94 'Dr%V6. GEL 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join andiorformthe appropriate I andsc ape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prlorto final map approval or Issuance ofbuilding permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne k, the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and Irrigation system shall beconlirtiousiy maintained by!he developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaft on the following streets) shall cgirtform to the rssuits of the respective Beautification Master Plan: ®. Drainage and Flood Comm 00" 1. The project (or portions thersof) is located within aaFf M Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as cor itiad iiy s ragistered'rivs Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. it shall be the developers responslbllity to have the culaent FIRM Zone V designation removsd from the project area. The developers engineer shall prepare ail necessary reports, plans, and hydmlogici hydramik calculaUcns. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLCMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prlar to fetal map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever o=rs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LQMR) shall be Issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or WMmvement aceeptanc e, whichever occurs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be submihed to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shah be installed as required by the City Engineer. SC - 2 /e1 11 of 12 WLI/ i Corn2ledon DAte• I —J--J— --J--J d. A permit from the County Flood Contn;fDistrict Is required it --work wiAw thin its right of -wayt, 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of an J� y public storm drainpipe Ineasured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk / 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a �---� blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. LRlllties 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary seweraga system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (ail underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. _ 2-The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities asnecassary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Drotectloru District., and the Environmental Health trepartment of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of ' compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final [nap approval or issum= of permits, whichever occurs first. Q. General Requirements and Apptaivats t. The separate parce 's contained within the project boundaries si rdlibehsgailycombined into one parcel prior to issuance of bxulk'Ing permits. C 2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits. whichever occurs first, for 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering tha estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Dstrict among the newly created parcels. a. EtiwandalSan Sevalne Area Regional Mainime, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior toQ al map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 5. Permits shall be obtained fmm lkx fol m► qg agencies for work within their right -al-way: O 6.A signed conssnt and wahror form to join andior form ttre Law Enforcement Community Facilities DisMct shall be filod with the City Erglmerpriorto final map approval 0!, the issuance of building pemmb, w NChever o=rs first. Formation costs shall be tome by the Devekver. 7. Prier to 4nalizati.n of arty development phase, suffiderg Improvement plants shall be com- piet?,!beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to th6 v, Iftfac-fon of the City Engineer. Phaza boundaies sluili correspond to lot lines shown on tiles approved tentative map. SC - 2/91 12 or 12 / —J--J- -J --- J �_J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGr1. �\ STAFF REPORT ZZX ,l DATE: June 12, 1991 i TO: Chairman lend Members of the Planning Commission FROM: B:ad Buller, City Plattner BY: Jerry Guarracino,`iAssistant Planter SUBJECT: FJIVIRONMEPiTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89 -IS - -' DIVERSIr -IEQ - The •development of Phase .IZ3 of a neighborhood commercial shopping center consisting of two retail buildings tot!x1ing 14,800'', square feet on 12.96 acres of land within an approved Phopping center in thdi Nei -$ torhood . Commercial :District, located at the noi'thsast corner of Haven and Highland Avenues - C APN: 201- 271 -65 and 71. Project Coordinator_ Debra Hanks of Diversified Shopping Centers has : requested this item be continued to the June 26, 1991, Planning G' Gbmmission Meeting. The contin4ince was requested to allow the. project,` manager to attend. the public hearing. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner ij BB:JG:gs ' ll ITEM S a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 12, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Manner BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 9],y.11 MANHIRE CONSTRUCTION - TPQ request to establish a contractor's office and yard within an existing 12,1S6 'square foot industrial building on 1.19 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) of the Industrial Specific Plan, locate'' at 9595 Lucas Ranch Road - AVN. ,210- 071 -42. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow contractor's office and yard within the General Industrial District. B. Appl: +,cable Regulations: The Industrial Area Specific Plan allows building contractor's offices and yards in Subarea 5 subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Storage yard; General Industrial, Industrial Area Specific Pian, Subarea S South - Manufacturing; General Industrial, Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 5 East Manufacturing, storage yard; General Industrial, Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 5 4est - Manufacturing; general Industrial, Industrial Area Specific Plan, 0,,ubarea 5 D. General Plan Desionat erns: Project Site - -eeneral Industrial, North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industriaa West - General industrial E. Site Characterise cs: , The site contains a 960 square foot office and 10,800 square foot warehouse building. Landscaping is located along the strestacape, but nowhere also on site. Asphalt paving surrounds the building on the south and east sides, and the remainder of the site is covered by gravel. ITEM T PLANNING CCMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91 -11 - XW1IRE CONSTRUCTION June 12, 1991 Page 2 F. Pa,._..ng Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces spaces of Ube Footage Rstio Reguirecq Provided Office 2,160. 1/250 8.6 9 Warehouse 9,600 1/1000 9.6 10 Total 18.2 T9 II. ANALYSIS- A. General: V e applicant intends to use the site as the corporate office and storage yard for his business which constructs baa.i and trash barrier fencing used for golf courses and landfills, Materials will be stored inside the building and ''construction equipment may also be stored on -site when it is not at a particular job site. Outdoor equipment storage is permiE` d within General Industrial areas provided that it is screened Vzom puWlic view by a view obstructing wall. S. Compatibility of Uses: Subarea 5 is zoned for General Industrial activities such as manufacturing and wholesale, storage and AOL distribution. The subarea conditionally permits more intense uses such as major automgvile and truck repair, heavy equipment sales and rentals, as well am petroleum p- oducts storage and extensive impact utility facilities: The applicant iu essentially proposing to use the site as a warehouse to stoire the materials used in conbtructinq the barrier fencing. Vehicles are proposed to be stored insidra the building when they ar6 not at a particular job site. The attached office structure will be used tc. house the administrative portion of the business and may expand into the warehouse building in the future. After reviewing the applicant's proposed use and comparing It with others in the area, staff does not anticipate any land use conflicts. C. Uooradino_of the Site: The site was developed prior to the incorporation of the CAty and does not comply with current development standards. Therefore, it must be upgraded to bring it 'into conformance with the minimum requirements of the district. Several improvements will be made to the property including: 1. Additional paving and striping of the site is required for all parking spaces and drive aisles. 2. New landscapo planters will be provided around the building. PLANNING COt3HISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-11 - HANHIRE CONSTRUCTION dune 12, 1991 Page 3 3. The existing landscaping along the streetsaape will be'> upgraded. 4. The building will be repainted. S. A screen wail and view obstructing gate will be constructed where a chain link fence currently exists. All of the required improvements have been made conditions of approval (see trie attached Resolution). Completion of these improvements will be required prior to occupancy of the site. D. Environmentjgl Assessment: Upon review of Part I of the Initial Study and completion of Part II of the Environmental Checklist, staff'has found no-significant impacts related to the proposed use. III. FACTS FOR,._ tjMNG'3: The Commission must make all of the - following findings iu zr:er to approve this application: A. That the proposed use is in accord with the General ,Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Area Specific Plan subarea in which the site is located. B. That the proposed usa will not be detrimental.-,to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injur;ov,'s to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applivfiiae provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have been sent to the adjacent property owners within 390 feet of the project. V. RECOMUDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Comgissioz► approve Conditional Use Permit 91 -11 through issuance of a Negative DeLlaration and adoption of the attached Resolution o! Approval. Respe lly Patted, Bra City - tlanner BB:SR:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letters from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Location Nap Exhibit "C" Site and Floor Plan " Resolution of Approval with Conditions � T a March 27, 1991 Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 932.0 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Dear Sir or Madam: Manhire Construction, Inc. is a general contractor specializing in the construction of either ball barrier or trash barrier fences. We construct these at golf courses and landfills throughout Southern California. We intend to house our corporate headquarters, material storage, and construction equipment at this location. our hours of - operation are 8:00 to 5:00 p.m. clerical and 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. construction. We would have approximately 20 employees at any one time. We are rryquesting the Conditional Use Permit (CT)P) because we intend to buy this property and have beeo informed t requires a CUP for a contractor's yard to be located in this area. Your cooperation in this matter would be appreciated.. Thank you. Very truly yours, James L. Manhire Vice President JLM:af 9375 Archibald ST. 801 Rancho Cucamonga. Co. 91730 714.944.6700 Cry OF c UCAMONGA PLEiIVL17%Nr- I7ION TrT°EM: C�,41 P . q}l�° 11 p x-rr: A -1 SCALE: L' t,` ~v �•� AIA a May 3, 1991 Mr. Dan Coleman City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Dear Dan: Re: Conditional Use Permit 93 -11 The following information is in response +;o your request letter dated April 26, 1991. 1. Material and Equipment Storage The material we use consists of assorted bolts, cable,_ pipe, and either poly or nylon netting. Our equipment is made up of two dump trucks, one back hoe, and one Bob Cat loader. These will be stored inside when not on the job site.. We also have eleven pickup trucks that are used at the job site, then parked at the supervisors' homes at night. 2. Landscape setback The building has a 33' setback, the closest existing parking space is 18' from the curb and the existing fence is 55' from the curb. 3. Our plans call for a block wall accross the front to match the front of the building and existing wall on the north side. The gates would be a 8' high x 20' wide roller that could not be seen through. 4. we were going to slurry seal and stripe the existing parking j lot at the very least. Maybe replace the front 100' at this time. We had not planned to pave the entire lot. 5. The landscaping would be trimmed and replaced as necessary. - _ Continued Ay= n� rrEM: cu p a ► -1► OF C pV iTCAMONGA TULE: Laker Vt . AtmucANY IN PLANNING— DWISION EXHIBIT: A -Z SCALE: f 1 Mr. Dan Coleman Page 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga May 3, 1991 6. The nitrogen tank is going to be returned tc the company that supplied the gas. 7. The trash enclosure wolAld be built at the same time as the block wall. 8. The building if ;going to be painted within our first six months along with all the other improvements. 9. Our office and warehouse staff would consist of four to six people. The bulk of our employees are located at various job sites throughout California or the Field offices in North. Hollywood or Apple Valley. I hope this information is helpful. Should there be any other questions, please do not hes:'.tate to call me. Very truly yours, MANHRIE CONSTRUCTION, INC. James L. Manhire Vice President JLM:af CITi' �UCAMONG PLANNiNiT DVYSION A ITEM: up a i- i! 'rITi.E: Lade+ FROG* �nea�.�e- f EXHMrr: A-3 SCALE: E lu OF IFW UC.AMONGA PLANNiii6 ; ION ITEM: CUP A1- !{ TM.E• k—oc4k4lopa MAP N 1 EXHIBrr: I scALE: 7-7 im O fal L, I fl fl Gq RESOLUTION NO. i A RESOLUTION OF THE - PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RA1;CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COND ?TIONAL'USE PERMIT NO. 91 -11 FOR A CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE liND YARD ON i.19 ACRES OF LAMID IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 5) OF Tim 'INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LC -GATED AT 9595 LUCAS RANCH ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SU ?PORT THEREOF - APIT' 210- 071 -42. A. Recitals. (i) James and Patricia Manhire have filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 91 -11 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 12th of June 1991, the P3,anning Commission of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the applicatioil and concluded said hearini on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resoiution Lave occurred. B. Resolnt' -oa- NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolutioe- are true and correct. 2. Bared upon substantial svidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on June 12, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, - together with publLc testimony, this Commies on hereby specificplly finds as follows: (a) The applicatioc applies to property located at 9545 Lucas Ranch Road with a strset frontage of 160.,feet and lot depth of ,324 feet :,nd is presently improved with a building, landscaping, paved areas ani gravel; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the pro; ?ty to the south of that site consists of a warehouse, the property to the east is a warehouselmanufa- taring building, and the property to the west is a warehouse. (c) Th' site does not comply with current dev1- to*ent standards, and must be upgraded to most the minimum requirements (,f the Development Code. _ r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU r' LION NO, CUP 53 -11 - :dANHI$E CONSTRUCTION June 12,: 1991 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission luring the sbove- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of `icts set forth in paragraphs l and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and ,oncludes as tollows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord- with the General Plan, tt objectives of the Development Coder and the purposes of tha district in iirtich the site is located. b ( ) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, sr „sty, or welfare or materials injurious to : Y j properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed a.aa complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development_e.ode, 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered In compliance with the California Environmental waality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby. issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every'randition set fo -th below and in tale attached Standard Conditions attached: hereto and incorporated her "n by tLis reference. - Plannina -Rion: 1) 1) Ali areas necessary for parking and access shall be paved in accordance with section 17.12 of the Development Code. 2) Landscaping shall be provided along the south and west sides of the building, and the exiting Zandscaping areas shall be upgraded, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3) A decorative wall and view obstructing gate shall be constructed to screen the yard from public view. 4) The building shall be repainted. If a new color is proposed, it shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. 5) The Ovisting Nitrogen ta" shall be removed. 77 PLANNING COMMISSION RSSOLUTI{ i. No. CUP 91 -11 - MANHIRE CONSTRi" 7N June 12, 1991 Page 2 f 3. Based upon tha- subscantial evidence presented to this Commission curing the abovs- referenced public hearing and upon tho .specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs l and'2 abc,e, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) Thor -;the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, �_.;'• the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the propoard , use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be'detrim4ntal to the public health, safety, or welfare.or materially injurious to'propertiea or improvements in th,% vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission herby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewtad and considered in compliance with the 'California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issuee, a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragrapha 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, thin Commission hereby approves.ihe application sub}act to each and every condition set forth below and in the .attached standard Conditions attached, hereto and incorporated aerein by this reference. Planning Div! aionn 1`-' All areas necessary for parking and access shall be paved in accordance with Section 17.12 of the Development Code. 2) Lands p shall be, provided along the aouth and j gate. aides of the building, and the sad .g andmcapiug areas shall be upgrzded, to the satisfaction of the CiCv Planner. 3) A decorstive wall and vterr obstructing gate � shall be constructed to screen the yard from 1 public view. i 4) The building shall be repainted. If a new color is proposed, it shall be reviewed',—d_ approved by the City Planner. 5) The existing'Nitrogen tank shall be removed, t V ` PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NC,. ' CUP 91 -11 - MANHIRE CONSTRUCTION 0 June 12, 2991 Page 3 III Engineering Division: 1), The existing driveway shall be removed 'And reconstructed per City Standard No. 306. It shall be 33 feet " wide at the street a right -of. -sway line and centered on the on -site. drive aisle. S. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption - of this Resolution.. APPROVED AND ADOP113D THIS 12TH DAY OF u-UN'E 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY, OF RANCHO CUCAMC411GA 1• BY: Larry T. McNiel., chairman ATTEST • Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the %.scy of Rancho Cucamo ^7e,, do hereby certify that 'che foregoing, Resolution was duly and regnb iy, introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning. Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at irregular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of June 1991, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CW1HISSIO1:SRS3 NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 014v cut DEPARTMENT OF QW60ma CUO& CONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT #: L V? ci I- t I SUBJECT: CO&MWT04I1- 0lpIr'I G E S `r't,0, L CA6 9Aw(A ." -s APPLICANT: ,1A -MPA � PA- MiLdIN AlAVMIEF, LOCATION: 61515 LuuAS P-owtk# W4,,&o. kPN,. 2- to -077 ( -+'Z- Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SVALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714) 4@9.1!361, FOR COmPLiANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDiTIONS: A. Time Limits 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, 11 building permits are I not issued orapproved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to r / - 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. _ is granted subject to the approval of ' 4. The developershalicommerx6, participate In, andoensummateorcausetobecontmenced, participated in, or consummated, a Aiello -I= Community Facilities D�ict (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Pmterkion District to 11nance constnlction andfor maintenance of a fire station to serve tha development. The station shall be located, des". and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fie Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon aompletbn. The equipment shall be ss ztxed by the District in accordance wkh Its needs. In any buildtng of a station, the deveirper shall comply with all applicable taws and regulations. The CFO shall be ranted by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. S. Prior to recordation of the final map or the Issuance of building pemtlts, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or parti*ate in, the esU biishme., t of a Meiio -Roos Community Facilities Ditftict for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the atiemathve, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of buiidirQ permits, whichever comes first. Further. k the affected school district has not formed a Mello -Roos Commurit y Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said pro1w, this condition shalt be deemed null and void. SC - 2/91 1 of 12 —Tl.Qq cmnwwm Ito _J_ /— /.J_ _/_ _/— This condition shall be waived 9 the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected schsoi districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a rL -suit of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to Issue--=a of buildin r permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected waterdistrict that adequate sewer and water facilities arc or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water districtwithin 90 days priorto final map approval in the case of subdivision orpriortoIssuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance vrith the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Divison, the conditions comaained herein, Development Code regulations, and J.Ausd 1 WR^ Specific Plan apet Planaediln3ttyr 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commena 3 thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of City 4= .:.inner. 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all UniformBuilding Code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prtorto occupancy. plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamongf, Fire Protection Drstft and the Building and Scfety Division to show compliance. The building snail be I spacted for compliance prior to occu Fancy. ✓_ a. Revises' <t to plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditbns of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. L, �5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to Issuance of any permits (such as g WkV,tree removal, encfoachment, building , etc.), or prior to final map approval in the cam of a custom lot sulWlvi%bn, or approved use has commenced, wtkhever comes first. i`°® 6. Approval of this request shall not waive cep with all sections +)f the Development Code, zill other applicabls City Ordamixes, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in affect at the time of Building Parma Issuance. 7. A detailed on-sae lighifrig plan shall be reviewed and approved ?by the CCy Planner and Sh8etlf s Department (989-Ml 1) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate Style, Illumination, k4afion, height, and method of shl kW* so as not to adversely affect adjament propeftles. S. it roe centralized trash receptacles are pmvfded, all trash pick -up shall be for Individual unP,s with all receptacles shfekied from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be sub)ect to City Planner review and approval prior to Issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. SC . 2/91 2 of 12 •1'r project s., Cur At -'tt Camcietian Dam. -J _J —/ .,J —! _/ J _ _ / J_ iJJ- i iJJ� s P""MN. -Coln 0.1 -1I Completion Date: _ 11. Street nares shalt be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adotved Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. ✓ 12. All building numbers &.4 individual units shall be identi ;led in a clear and concise manner, J—I including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum sloFas, physical conditions, fencing, and J� weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and r000rdarlon of the FinaiTract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developershall upgrade a1A construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements, 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &Rs) shall riot prohibitthe keeping of equine _J—J- animals whero zoning requirementstorthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall havethe option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC &Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and RestrUv ros (CCBRs) and Articles of Incorporation of the J -1 Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. ' ✓ 16. Allparkways, open areas, and landscaping shall beperriumentlymaintamad bytheproperty o%! owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained In a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurremtywith the reordation of the final map or Issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The Easements shall prohibit the castR ig of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Corte Section 17.08.069 -G-2. 18. The projW contains a designt,ad Historical Landmmark. The site shall be devebW and maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit Rio. . Any turther modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior afierations andlor interior alterations which affedtheexteriorof the buildings arstnrctures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, rolocatlon, reconstruction of buildings orstructures, orchanges to the site, shall require a modiiicelon to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Oeaign 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other aternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. Ali swkriming pools Installed at On time of initial davebprnent shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be sutlmWed for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural --' - �- treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. SC -2/91 3or12 7-r Protect No.t(Uf 41 It Compeam Duct 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners, Association shall be submitted for J J_ City Plannerand Building Official• review and approval prior to issuance of Mikfing permits. +j 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and thesound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building desEv;;and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in bult669 plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate detaUn on building plans) fit. All parkingloti andscapeislandsshallhaveaminimumou ;sidedimensionot6feetandshall contain a 12 -inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall bel providedthroughoutthe development to connect dwellings/unitaftildingswith open span. plazas/recreational uses. ✓ 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and at, ;driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shag restrietthe storage ofnweationa {vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in desiggntaled visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, aril Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval pdorto Issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained larxfae" areas, refer to SeMlon N.) ✓��. A detailed landscape and krigation plan, lnckxgfqs" planting and mod3l home iar&xap- ing in the case of residential development, shah be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for CityPlarsler revkwandappmval pdorto theissuanceotbuiiding permits or prior final map approval in the :ace of a custom lot &WAslon. -2. Existing trees required to be preserved inpiaceshaiibe protected with a construction barrier In accordaromwIM Me MuPJ*W Code SWion 19.08.110. and so notedonthe grading plans. The tocationolthosebeeatobepnssarvedinplaae and now locations for transplantedtrees shad be atKw ronthedetailedmndwgm plants. The applicantshallfollowakof the arborisrs recrommeiniatlons regarding preservation, transplanting and tdmmkQ methods. 3. An' %mmof 4reespergross acre. comprised oittwidiowirgsizes ,shall beproyWed with ,, toe project: %- 48- Inch box or larger, %- 36- inch. box or larger; % - 24- inch box or larger, % = 15-galion, artd % - 5 a_aeont. 4. A minimum of % of tree°; planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. r Withth parking tots. trees tth l be planned at a rate of one 15- galion tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 504/6 of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. W -x181 4 o 12 7 /6 I i �I J� 6. Trees shrai be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 7. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 orgreater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, Irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting reguirea by this section shall include a parrnanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. i3. All private slopes in excess of6 feet, but less than a feet in vertical height and of2 :1orgreater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated forerosion control artti +.o soften their appearance as follows: one 15 -gallon or largersize tree per each 150 sq. ft, of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub pereach 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cnver., In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 :1 orgreater slope; Ntall also include one 5 -gallon or fc ger size tree per each 250 sri. ft, of slope area. Treed V shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slops planrig required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be Installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- ously maintained In a heaghyand thriving condition by the developaruntil each individual unit is sc!d and occupied bythebuyer. Friortomleasingoccupaneyforthoseunhs ,aninspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to dotermine that they are in satist- --- ,, condition. 10. For multi- family residential and non- residentlab development, property owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within tho public ", -of -way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maissttained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and t►;mming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and /or�, This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, wags, landscaping, and sidewalks sh�l be included in the required landscape plans and siltl!M be subject to City Planner review and aMoval andcoondkWedforconsistencywkhariypariavay latx#:. ;itlglslanwhichmaybe required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial root, specimen size treer,'meander- ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified taridscaping, is required Ong 14. Landscaping and lrrigatio7 systenrs requked to be installed withinthe public right- cf-way on the perimeterof 11M project area shag be conikwusly rnaintained by the developer. S. Ali wails shag be provided with decorative treatment. if located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering DM". =16. Tree maintenance crriteria shag be develoW and submitted for Cite Planner review and approval prior to issuarl;e of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. t.'� 17. Landscaping and irrigation shag be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xedscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SC - 2/91 15 of 12 T /tP Pm�sp.:Cyeq -it Completion Due: _/_! I— _/ J --/—i— � —J Pro,= A—:a.l !z 4I l F. Signs Complcum Date: 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not apart of thisapp oval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance a +u shall —/--_/ require separate application and approval by the Planning Division priorto instariation of any signs. 2. A uniform Sign Programforthis development shall be submitt?d for City F'fanner reviewand _1_ JJ approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monumentsign(s) shall be provided for apartment, oondominfum, ortownhonrs prior to occupancy cr:id shall require separate application and, approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as detsmined by the City Planner, priorto accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted —J —J•- Speaial Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in rc_ standard formal as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written nelbe of the Foothill Freeway project In a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepts» q, a Casit deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the _J_J issuance cf building permits. The final report shall discuss th3 level of interior noise attenuaiionto below 45CNF .L, the buildng materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of themkigallon measures. The building plans will be ch—.ced for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agenclas 1. Em3rgencyseccndaryaocesss. UlbeprovidedinaaxmdancewAh Rancho Cucamonga Fire —�--j Protection District Standards. ✓�2. Emergency access shall be provided, mailmanamfreranaiasar,amUrna tof26feetwide �--� at 211 times during construction in accotcdance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to Issuance of Njilding permits for combos" oanstru d on, evidence shall be JJ— submittedtothe Ranchot Ammonp Fire Protection Din4rlotthattermaorarywatersupplyfor fire protection 13 available, pending completion of r equfrsd fire protection system. 4. The applicant shall contact the U. S. Postal Servio4 lo detema, appropriate type and location of malt boxes. Mu#Wan*y rest iential developments shalt poMde a sold overhead struc?ure for mail boxes with adequate kiting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shah be subject to Cly Plermr review and approval prior to the issuance cs buikNng permits. —5. For pralects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acrd ;Witty, including all ' - 1 supportive infornalion, shall be obtained i►? t the San Bemard w C Minty Deparimarn of Environme ntat Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. SC . 2191 i3 or 12 —7/7 =vise \c.: f rip oil 11 COMRICd00 Dam: APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 983-1653, FOR COMPLIANCE WITti THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Site Development f 1. The applicant shallcomplywhhthe latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanl- cal Codn, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Cade, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Buckling and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits fora new residentiai dweitira unit(s) or major addition to existingunit( s), theappticantshatipaydavebpment ,4esatthe6stabgshedrate_ Such fees may include, but are rat limftedto: City Beautdfcation Fee, Park Felt, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. ✓ 3. Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an exis'' 3 development, the apptiCe it shag pay development tees at the established rate. ' ch fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, S, .,00l Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after1ract/pareel map recordation and prior to issuance of building penTAS. J. Existing Structures ✓ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property tine clearances considering use, area, and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building Shall be demolished. —J—J- -J--J- --J--]— ...J_.1 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shag be removed, tilled and/or capped to comply with the Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Cotta. 4. Underground on -site utilities are to be boated and shown on bulidktg plans subrt*W for bulk" permit application. K. Grading /1. Grading of the subject properly 3haii be in a mordant w4h the Untforrn Building Code, City Grading Standards, and aceepied grading Rwactioes. Ths final grading plant shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shag be prepared bya gtuallfied engineer licensed by the State of Ceiwomfa to perform such wrxk. da relo",.frtent Is located within the sow emWn control boundaries: a Sow Disturbance Pe.m* Is rewired. Pisan contact San Bernardino CouM Departinent of Agfthure at(714) i" -1111 for permit application. Documentation of such pennk shd be submitted to the City p„ or L7 the Issuance of tough grading permit. 4. A geological report shag be prepared by a qualified angfneer or geologist and subcnttted at the tfrne of application for grading plan check. S. The f Inal grading plans shall be completed and appmved pdorto kwance of building permits. SC-2191 701`12 —rlv —f—J- -J--J-- J� _ __ - -i—. __J I_ prowet �o.:l .+tD.,A I'll 6. Asa custom -lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on -site - drainage facilities necessary fordewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto tinat map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate Basements for sate disposal of drainage water that are conducted unto or over adjaLint parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of tt* Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewate0mg and protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving. ,3r within a pant I relative to which a building iramril Is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Balding and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading pemrits. (This may be on an incremen:_:l or composite basis.) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet In vertical height shag be seeded with native grasses or planted with groundcroverfor erosion control upon compietionof grading orsomeother alternative methodoferosioncontml shall be completed to the satisfaclion of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shaft be provided. This requirement does riot release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.0401 of the Development Mode. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE ENGiHEERING DIVIM y, (714) OW1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONUMNS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights -of -way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all Interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, pubic Iaruiscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans r+ nor 4enka+ive map. Priiate easements for non - pubic facilities (cross -lot drainage, local feeder trails, eta) shalt be reserved as slim on the plans andfor tentative map. ✓' 2. DecIN-Ation shall be made of the following rights- of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 33 tow feet on L oUAS Rmj&fi RaW total feet rn total feet un total feet on 3. An irrevocable offerofdedfcationfor_ 4 00 twkteroadwayeasemetttshallbemade for all private streets or drives. 4. Non- vehicular access shalt be dedicated to ttr City for the following streets: _J_J_ _J__!_ J_J _J.—J _J_ _J_ J__1 J___J 5. Reciprocal access ear iments ethall be pm -4ded ensuring access to all parcels by CC &Rs i or by deeds and shail .,d recorded cow, ently with the °map a. priarto the issuance of f building permits. where no map ie involved. SC - 2/91 8 of 12 P.rm';. -Cup arts Dates 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot orainage shall be provided and shall be delineated I Comdeaon JJ or noted on the final map. 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10 -foot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: "IlWe hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of (residential) buNfings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lotto the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. ✓ 8. all existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequitciaimedor delineated on I —!—!- the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees piacGd outside the put9ic right-of -way shall be dedicated to ;he City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10..4ddkfonal stivet right -of -way shall tie dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum J_J— & 7 feet measured from the face oil curbs. if curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenarze easement shall be provided. 11. The developershall make agoaftaitheffoittoacquirethe rewired off- ste property Interests _I_J necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so. the developer M-til, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time asthe City uquires the property interests re0led forthe Improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all Osts Incurred by the City to acquire the off -site property interests required Inconnectionwiththe subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposk in the amwunt gh,en in an appraisal report obtained by the devolloper, at developer's cost. The appraiser shalt have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the zppraisal. M. Street Improvements 1. All nublic improvements (interior streets, drainage fackles, conimurtty trzils, pose is J_J lancfs�}ad areas, etc.) shown on the plan antd/ortentatfve map shall be (x) ruched to City Standards. Interior street intpmvemerts shal iinchuie, but are not limited to. curb and gutter. AC pavement. drive approaches, sidewalks, street JgNs. and street irries. _-2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement, wkhfrt a 40 400t wide daft- .,.ated drn-of -wiry shall be I �� constructed for all haM- secliort streets. E ✓ 3. ConstW the following perimeter street Improvements fnclrding, but not lmfted to: SC -2 /at 9012 7 L--- - Notes: (a) Median Island includes- ',andsrrrong and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (o) if so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per ST 304. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of, construction fee shall be provided for thisitem.[v) ashsirvctAs nrcc _ oeunSlwchi�, e,P .(nyur�_ L/.4. 'Improvement plans and construction; ,a. Street improvamsnt plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer, shat be submitted to and approved by the City Ermnineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of tho ity Engineer and the City Attorney guararz%)einq completion of the public andlor private street improve- ments, priorto final map approval orthe issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-af -way, fses shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. z. P %,vement striping, marking, traffic, street name sprig, are.-' !eteroonnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, d. Signatconduitwmthpullboxesshallbeinstaeiledon any newconstructionor reconstruction of major, tiecord" or collector streets which intersect: with other major, secondar; or collectrxstreets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shelf be placed on both sides of the z# eetad3feetoutstdeofECR,ECRorar" other locations approved bythe City Engineer. Note -: (t) All putt boxes shall be No. 6 unies =, oNherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3 -Inch gaetvanized steel with pulrone, e. Wheelchair ramps shall be Installed anal four corners of Intersections pe, City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City marls requiring construction shall remain open ks traffic at all times with adequate Moursduringconstnxtion. Astreetclosure permit maybe required. Acast depostt shall be provided to cover the coat of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the sa tisiection of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shafinot am side+rsallm. Under sidewalk drains shall tx install edd to City Standards, except for single family fats. h. Handxap access ramp design shah be as spedfled by the Cityy EngWOr. 1. Street aromas shall tie approved by the City Plan rpdorto sutlirn tatfor firsst plan checsl S. Street irtaproeement Plana per City Standards for as private streets shall be provided f9 review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work frairtg pefbaned on the ;W vats streets, tees shall be paid and construction per: to shalt be obtained from Ow City Engineer's Office in a; Mtlon to any other permits rdmquired. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, sttall be installed per City SMOU& it accordance with the City's street tree program. SC -2/91 10 or 12 em,en \o "( )t AHI Scmdeggn Dam• J —J J.J J__J J_J __J_._!_ J_J_ J--J— -J__J J�1 j-� 7. Intersection line of site des�,7ns shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. my a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intense Vions,. including driveways. Walls, signs. and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by moving the 2 + /- closest street treason each side awayfromthe street and placed Ina street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following rigtrt -of -way: _ 9. All public improvements on the fallowing streets shall be operationally complete prior to tY l issuance of" gilding pennits: N. ft ife Maintenance Ar+sas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways. medians, paseos, easements, traits, or other areas are required to he annexed Into tt,a Landscape Maintenance District: ✓'� 2. A signed consent and waiverforrn to join andlorform the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City EngV- `^rta final map approval orwuunrceofbr!iiding permits whichever occurs T-al. Formation cams shall be borne by the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall Ncontinuousfy maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the following streets) shah conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plant: O. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thereof) is hinted within a Flood Hazard Zone: therefore, flood protection measures shag be r ovided -- =4 1 ied by a registered Civil Engineer arxl approved by the City Engineer. 2. it shall be the developer's respunsiW.y to have the current` FIRM Zone esignation removed from the proje(i area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, props, and hydml gl0hydrauft calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shalt be obtained tromp FEMA pdorto final map approval or issuance of bu;,* ft p2rmds, whichever occurs first. A Leae; • sap ReWilon (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acc:,aalwe, whichever occurs first. Ask 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior t( map approval or the issuance of building pennts, whictteverctccursiirst. All drainage facilities shall be installed as requilm" by the City Engineer. SC -2/91 l�oft3 Tsj� pf� Pmwa Sp.:COP 41 -.- .;.. Completion Date' J_J Jam_ .__/_ /_ --J--J— --J--J- J_1— w.... J- 4. A parmft from the County Flood Control District is required for work Within its-right-of-way. 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter t,1 any public storm drain pipe measured Irom the ou sr edge of a Mature tree trunk. _ C. Public storms drain e2s.9ments shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the,;:iblic street. P. Utilities 1. Provide saparate utility sere as to eactt parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, slactric power, telephone, and cable TV tall underground) in acGordancewhh the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2.The deveivpur, ir11 be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessarv. e. A'ater and sewer pt As shall be desl�ned and constructed to meetthe recluitaments of the Cucamonga Cout:ry Water Dia4 ct (COWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and ttv Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWO is roMi^gd pt;G. to final .gip appmva4 or Issuance of permits, whichever occurs Sirst. 0. ^zene +mil Requirements and Approvatsn 1. The separate parcels contained wilhin the project boundarks shall belegaliycombined into f anus parcel prior to isst:snce of building permits. R. An ess0m -)nt for a J,int us ,1 driveway shall he provided prior to fiat map apprw.,al or ie suance of building pe►ntits, which;9veroccurs first, for: 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall tae, pos%d with the City c ovtlring the .,stimVed cost of apportioning the aissosruneeds VAderAS5us5rt'tent Diste among the newly created parcels. 4. Etwanda/Ssn Sevalr a Area Regional Mainline. Secondary Regional, and Master Alan Drainage Fees shall be paid priorto fetal map apWoval or pdorto buikii: g pamlh Issuanci -it no m* is involved. 5. Permil:. shall be obtained from the following agencies forworic wift, their right-of-way: S.A sgrK consent and wale -tr form to join &ndlor form the Law Enforcement Community Faalftiae Dkbid Sh O be filed with tho City Engineer prir to final map approval or the issw. ice of building penft, whichever o Aim first. t=oemaib+' =;46 shag to boma by the Developer. —j- Prior to f fnalizaWn of any development phase, sufficient improvement plane shall be com- plated beyond the phase bourdarles to amire secondary access and drainage protecikn to the satisfaction of the pity EPginaer. Phase boundaries shAN cormsp id to lot finis shown on the approved ter'•4Ye map. SC -'2/91 12 or 12� Praiea \o.;f Up i1t'fi comylenon Date: _.s_J- _ --J J .J� —J--J_ J— --J—.J- r_I DATE: TO: Flom: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA STAFF Fa,EP€ .RT June 12, 1991 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL, 11PACT REPORT FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 - SAHAMA CNVESTMENTS - A public hearing to comment on the draft Environmental Impact Report prepared for a residential subdivision and design review of 73 single family -home- on 113.. acres of land in the Hillaide Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located north of Almond Str• <et, between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APH: 200- 05'-07, 55, 56, and 57. I. DISCUSSION: A. Generale On February 28, 1990,'Sahama Investments submitted a Vesting Tentative Tract Map application for an 113 acre parcel located in th) northwest corner of the City. The applicant is proposing to develop 73 single family lots, 2 lots for future water reservoirs required by the Cucamonga County Weter District, and several open space pots includinT. "the Cucamonga Wash and a portion of the Cucamonga Earthquake Fault System. B. CEQA: Upon submittal of the subdivision application, staff reviewed a previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the site in conjunction with another project to determine if the report, together with the pzopesed mitigation measures, adequately addresses the new proposal. Under the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), staff determined that a subsequent Environmental Impact Report was required for the following reasons: 1. The project has been expanded rnd modified from that which was addressed in the previous EIR; The City recently adopted tte Hillside Grading ordinance which controls development in areas over 8 percent in slope. This ordinance was not in effect at the time the previous EIR vas prepared; and 3. Based on information provided by the aLiplicant, the precise location of the Cucamonga Fault has been determined to be different than that which was previously reviewed. ITEM_ U PLANNING (;OjMIISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR VTT 14475 - SAHAMA'-mSTMENTS June 12, 1991 Page 2 Additionally, staff feels that a significant period of time has lapsed since the previous EIR was certified and a subsequent EIR is necessary to update the, information contained in the previous EIR. On October 10, 1 990, the Planning Commission reviewed a proposed Scope of Services for the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report. The Scope of Services included a review of V-4 previous EIR and entraction of infoSmation applicable to the current project and the addition of the following items: 1. Land Form and Topograpby - Analysis of the proposal as it relates to the adopted Hillside Development Ordinance; 2. Geology and Soils - Compare the geologic information previously submitted with the new studies to as3ess the impact on development; 3. Biological Resources - Re- evaluate the species inventory prepared for the original SIR to determine its relevance to the current project is light of the greater focus on species habitat; 4• Public Services - Analyze the ability of the police, fire, water, and school facilities to serve the project; and 5. Alternatives - Explore alternatives to the proposal to try and minimize potential environmental impacts, particularly grading. As required by CEQA, the purpose of this public hearing is to recei;�e—t4s—timony on the Draft SIR. (Copies of the Draft F.IR were previous2y sent to the Planning Commission under separate cover.) The public comment period began on April 25, 1991, and will conclude with the closing of the public hearing. Copies of t:.e Draft EIR have been sent to other government agencies (see Exhibit "B ") fcr their review and comment. To date, only one response has been received:. from the Chaffey Joint Union High School District (See Exhibit "C ") and can be addressed ns initgation measures included in the EIR. At this time, the Commission is not determining the adequacy of the EIR. Rather, the Planning Commission is conducting the public hearing to receive any additional testimony on the EIR. Following conclusioc{ of the public hearing, re3panses will be prepared to the comments (both written and oral) for inclusion in a Fimel EIR. Upon completion of the Final EIR, another public hearing will be scheduled before the Commission to address the adequacy of the EIR. If, howe.ier, the OCRf PLAENING C0MMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR,VTT 14475 - SAHAKA IWm_STMENTs June 12, 1991 Page 3 Commission identifies areas that have not been adequately y addressfd, the Commission may mention those items now so that: j{ they can be included in the Final EIR. t.``. For the Commission's information, the subdivision and Design Review applications are scheduled for Grad?ng, Technical, and Design Committee review the week of June 16, 1991. Comments received on the EIR will be taken 31nto consideration in the design of the project. Any mitigat46n measures identified in the EIR will become conditions of approval for the project or require•ct:anges to the project design. II. CORRESPONDENCE: Advertisements were placed in the inland Valley Daily Bulletin on April 25, 1991 indicating that the Draft EIR was available for public review and comment through June 10, 1991. Copies of the Draft EIR were distributed to affected agencies and interested parties. Additionally, notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site and the `site was pry ted for the public hearing.. P I1I. AEC4':.;ENDATiON, Staff recommends' that the Planning Commi3sion conduct a public hearing to receive testimony and :comments on the Draft Enviroifimental Impact Report. At the close of the 'public hearing, staff should be directed, by' minute action, to prepare responses to the comments received for inclusion in the Final Environmental impact- tteport. Re4JB3e sub R (r` 4Br City Planner BB:SM /jfs P.ttachmeits: Exhibit "A" - EIR Distribution List Exhibit "B" - 'Responses to EIR Distribution i 'r �� Y `TT 14475 Subsequent Draft EIR Distribution List Cucamonga Co. Water District San Bernardino County 9641 San Bernarimo Road Environmental Analysis Div. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 385 N Arrowhead, 3rd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415 County of San Bernardino U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Flood Control Department P.O. Box 1172 82S East 3rd Street Los Angeles, CA 90053 San Bernardino, CA 92415 -0835 Rancho Cucamonga Fire District U.S. Forest Service 5613 Amethyst 6th S.W. Region Offie Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 630 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 State Clearinghouse (Ioxc) CA Dept. of Fish & Game Office of Planning & Research Attn: Fred Worthley 140010th Street 245 W. Broadway, Suite 350 Sacramento, CA 95814 Long Beach, CA 90802 - I San Bernardino County SB National Forest Servic.°. Planning Department Cajon Ranger Distict 385 N. Arrowhead, 3rd Floor Attn: Gaty Earney San Bernardino, CA 92415 Box 100 Fontana, CA 92336 -9704 Chino Basin MWD Santa Ana Regional Water 8555 Archibald Avenue Quality Control Board Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 6809 Indiana Avr, Suite 200 Riverside, CA 92506 Alta Loma School District 'Tom Meyers Attn: Superintendent Can Dept of Transportation 9350 Base Une Rd., Suite F Transportation Plannitg, Branch. B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 P.O. Box 232 San Bernardino, CA 92402 Chaffey Union High ScIL Dist City of Rancho Cuaamonga (10xc ) Mika Dirkson. Superintendent Community Development DepC. 211 Nest 5'b Street Aim Scott Murphy Ontario, CA 91761 195M Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 San Bernardino County Sheriff Rancho Cucamonga Substation 10510 Cwic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City of Upland, Planning Attn: Planning Director 460 North Euclid Upland, CA 91786i�fi:$ij i'1 r Chaffey Joint Union High School District 211 WEST FIFTH STREET, ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA 91762 -1698 • ( 714) 988.6511 • FAX (714) 9844164 f SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS ASSOCI. TE SUPERINTENDENT SCe RD MEI BERS Dean E. Smothers TRUCTION Kathleen E. Kinley . Tat B. Harrison sIsr. 6 « ASSISTANt SUPERINTENDENT \' . Raymond. J. Sarrio PEVPONNEL � I s4 it -' I,lei J. Uhalley CITY O( RANCHO CUCAfe-ffi hld W. won Donau E. Culp _ May 6, 1991 Mr. Scott Murphy [I, CITY GF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Ranchu Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: TT 14475 EI$ �- I: We have received the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for TT 14475. In response, we ask you to consider the followings 1. As noted in our letter of November 27, 1990 contained in the Appendix, we ha — a a variety of concerns that were not addressed in the EIR. Student transportation will be ,impacted and the added residents will potentially place a greater demand on community uses of Alta Loma High School. 2. Horses of this product type have a higher generation factor than indicated in the EIR. Our experience indicates the number to be .2 per household. 3. We are in the process of forming a Mello -Roos CFD for the,,purpose of assuring:, adequate school facilities. We request that �,,,Vproval of the dev,aopment be conditioned upon the developer jai. ning our CFD or provide comparable mitigatio -Z. her Thank you for the opportunity to comment. fj Sincerely, 19AN B. SUNDELL Director Busine -s Services SBS /sbx SCHOOLS: ALTA LOMA. • CHAFFEYADULTtOLICATION • CHAFFFFEEY . ETRVANDA • MONTCLAIR . ONTARIO .,,VALLEY VIEW - q,. /i gal CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 12,`1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comnissior.' FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Bett; A. Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13694 - INTECH TENTURFS -W uBdivision of . acres of an d into parcel s 1n t e �•neral Industrial District of the Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 8, located ixn the south ride of Arrow Route between Red Ork Street and White Oak Avenue - Ak 209 -144 -09 and a portion of 209- 144 -06 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested: Approval of the proposed Teatative Parcel Map as shown on Exhibit "B. B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1,,`, 5.74 acres Parcel Z' 3.50 acres Parcel 3 1.26 acres Total TU-. W acres i C. Existing Zoning: Gf.meral Industrial, Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 8 D. Surrounding Land Use: North Post Office South - Vacant East - Vacant West - Industrial Buildings' E. Surraunding General Plan and Development Code Designations: f North - Industrial Park, ISP Subarea T South - General IndustriAl , ISP Subarea 8 East General Industrial, ISP Subarea 8 Best - General Industrial, ISP Subarea 8 _TM v PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENT PM 13694 - _INTECH VENTURES OF CALIF. June 12, 1992 Page 2 F. Site Characteristics: The site contains an existing 118,600 square foot warehouse building, with a parking area on the north side. Street improvements exist along the Arrow Route frontage., II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this parcel map is to create threF 13) parcels consistent with the Previously approved Development Review 'Q -40, as shown in Fxhibit "C'. Since the proposed parcel map extends ea:.t of the existing parcel Iine,a lot line adjustment and dedication for Vincent Avenue will be recorded prior to nr concurrent with the final map. The conditions of approval require the full width construction of Vincent Avenue, from Arrow Route to the south project boundary. Reciprocal access easments and maintenance agreements shall b�, provided by CC &R's. A reciprocal non - buildable easement shall be provided around the existing buildi .,;g to the satisfaction of Building and Safety.; •. All improvements to Parcel 1, as specified in DR 88 -40, shall be completed and all drainag:_facilities to eliminate cross lot drainage to adjacent praperties installed prior to approval of the final map. IIl. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial tug to con ucted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the. environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent: to surrounding property owners and placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider as r npu� t an elements of the Tentative Parcel Map 13694. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, �" R, IAAWIs Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:B.'M: jh 11 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinit Map I Exhibit "B" - Tentative Map Exhibit "C" OR 88.40 Site Plan Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval r 1` O r u El CITY OF RANCHO CU'CAMONGA ENGDMEMG DraMO d Y N nM&PARtEL MAP 13694 Tm ; V I O NI Y MAP uB. _ .- ARROW CITY OF R.ATCHO CUCAMONGA EN'GME EMG D ,&ON I`ll MR= MI 't'I1m. TENi" RTI V E 100' N 131094 MA 2 r 1 AP-Rt3 W R0LJT &. ITlyOF cANCHO CUCAMONGA ENCT r ING DrUSION V5" i ;QPAUEL MAP 136c? 14: TnU. DX SITE PLAN q% ►� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAe CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13694, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE UETWEEN RED OAK STREET AND WHITE OAK AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 209— ?.44 -09 ANZ) A PORTION OF 209 - 144 -06 WHEREAS, Tentative 2arced Map Number 13694, submitted by Intech Ventures of California, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 3 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 209- 144 -09 and portion of 209- 144 -06, located on the south side of Arrow Pouts between Red Oak Street and White Oak Avenaa; and WHEREAS, on June 121'`,1991, the Planning Commission held duly advertised public hearing for tWabove- described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANT:O L'- TCAMOUGA PLANYI. -NG COl$iaUSSICN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS, SECTION 1: That the following findings have beer, mallet 1. That the map in consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of _4 proposed subdivision in consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for rftz proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting properties. SECTION 2% This Commission fiAds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and convidered in compliaoce with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970; and further, i!ig Commission hgsby issues a Vagative Declaration. SECTION 2, Tentative. Parcel Map Number 13694 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: Plgnnina Div sign 1. All improvements on Parcel 1 shall be complet4d per approved ,Devalopment Revisw a8 -40 to the satisfaction of the City planner prior to approval of the Ana.!,, )Lrcel 'nap. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. !CENT PM 13694 INTECH VENTURES OF CALIF June 12, 3991 Page 2 2. Reciprocal parking shall be provided by CC&Rs�! Building & Safety Division t //� 3. ino4all all drainage facilities to eliminate cross lot drainage from this site onto adjacent Iroperties to the satisfaction of the 9uilding Off ial prior to approval of tbq final parcel map. 4. The' proposed Yazd Easement. surroun ing the existing building on Parcel 1 shall be a wn of the final parcel map. Eaneme_t doc ontation to the satisfaction of tta BL-lding Official shall be recorded concurrently with the f al parcel map. Fire_Prote�ction District Maintenance ag!,eements assn nq joint maintenance of fire protection systems a hydrants serviced r�, a ,ommon supply ay{tsm r'all a provided by CC&Rs. Enoineerinc Divis).2n 6. A lot line adjustaien to incetporate the portion of APK 209- 144 -06 won of Vincen Avenue shall he recorded prior to ap -eval of the t';-►1 parcel map. 7. Vincent Avenue all be fall width, including atrest 4• ghts, from-,Arrow trout to the south project boundary off -site saidewalks ana street trews nays be defer until devel- --went of then adjacent property. Th developer may z,..uest a reimbursement agreement to cover the cost of constructing off -site improvements rom future dsvelojoent. e. Provide s ndard property- liner- ndjacenc sidewalk on Vincent A nuc, 9. /thaast ing overhead utilities (telecommunications +;rical) on the project side of Arrow Route e vndazgrounded from the first p2le off -site tAs west project boundary to the first pole on side of Vincent Avenue prior to public ent accepta:sce or occupancy, wh ohever occurs The devetzpar mar request a reimbursement t to_Tocovmx one -half the C3t;,'s adopted cost ergrounding from future development as it n the opposite -side of the street. i V7 v �_l O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT PM 13694 - INTECH VENTURES OF CALIF June lk, 1991 Page 2 2. Reciprocal parking sh&11 be p ^ovided by CC &Rs. 3. Vrat�v a shall be o najFletit tTtki ej, t , �k Pyenue n the rtinal Map. "[ a 9uildino_& Safety Division 4. Install all drainage- facUities t-� eaiminate cross lot drainage from this 0,te onto ndiacent properties to the satisfaction of the 3uileing official prior to approval of the final parcAL map. 5. The proposed Yard l.•ement surrounding the existing building on Parcel I shall be shown''Dn the final parcel map. Easement documsn�:ation to tha satisfaction of the Huilc?ing 'Official sha7.l be recorded concurr,dtly with cute final parcel map. Fire Protection District !! 6. Maintenance agreements' assuring joint maintenance of firl protection systems and hydeant9 serviced by a lf comenon supply systam shall be pravide by CC &Rs. f Engineering Division 7. A lot line adjustment to incorprrate the portion of APN 209 -- 144 -06 west of Vincent Avenge shall be recorded prior to appro %al of this final parcel map. S. Vincent Avenue shall be constructed- full width, inclt.ding street ,lights, from Arrow Route to the south project Loundary. Off -site sidewalks and street trees may be deferred until development of the adjacent property. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of coratructing off -site improvements from future development. 4.. Provide standard property -line- adjacent sidewalk on Vincent Avenue. 10. The existing overhead utilities (tolecemmunivations and electrical) on the p -ject sida of �:erow Route shill be undergrounded from the first pole off -site west of the west project boundary to the first pole on the east side of Vincent Av*rus prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever or;aurs first. Tta davelopar may regtvvet a reimbursement agreement to recover - one -half the 'City's. adopter{ coat for undergrounding from fz°ture devalopmsnt as it "cure on the opposite side of the street: V �r ,. PANNING COMMISSIJN RESOLUTION NO. TENT PM ;:3694 — 3N.TECH VENTURES`OF CALIF June 12, 1491 ;i raga 3 10. Street improvements oiz the south; side of Arrow RSauts shall be conrtructed from the existing t4 rwinua 1; eaoterly throt0h the ultimate ECR on the east side of - the Arrow /t1incent (White .Oak) intersection. Provide t.ransition`,1 to ' the existing pavement to the - sarisiactie<i of the City, Engineer. ,Tht developer may request a reimbursement agreement to reco ?er tha cost of constructing itiprovements sagt of 'the Vincont'- Avenue venterlins fiom future development. 71. Zrndecaping within the "Limited Use Areas" for all re "jech rriveways r_nd the inters®ction of Arrow /Vinoeni: (White Oak) shall be approved by.-the City Traffic Engineer. 12. Tae int line between Parcels 1 and 3 sha_ be adjusted -' to run along the .face of the proposed )nuilding on Parcel 3, per DR 80-40, prior to approval of the final parcel map. 13. Pursuant to provisions of i4lifornia Public Resources Code Sectiod 21089(b), thin application shall not. be operative, vested tlr final, nor will building permits be issued or a map rezcord,rdt, until (1) the Notice of Detemiuntion (NOD) rejgftling 'the associated enviro mental action it!" `ti` gad and posted with the Clark of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Earn ardino; ' and (2) any, and all required it] Lag fens 11 assessed pursuant *o Caiifornfa Rish and Gaza Coda Section 711.4, together with say required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk,, plr the County of San Bernardino. %her applicant ahall provide the Engineering Department with ' & stamped and c riformed copy of the NOD Together with a receipt that all foeR save been paid. I In tbu, event this "application is d*,termincd exempt from such filing fee's pursuant to .,nn provisions of the •:�alifornia Fish and Gamy Code, or the guidelines promuayar:ed thereunder, - ::cep* f:ar payment of any require:I hamdling charge for filing a vartliics<te Of Fee Examption, this ` I }.tion ahal',l be deemed null and void. ` APPROVED ° hDOPTED'THIS 12TH -, PLANNING' %:OKMISSION i4?,THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC..,,Rl . 1' 1 Y Iv N E aY q L n^ � nun NG ..Z r nEV a a q� o y y -Z V `o°I �.qir. d C __i Y. `\ s y.•. Y nY N � L 1 r. L O ,. °° y b A4 r� O C M, •:. .al j, ` �Ob. A.i.Q YnCY. �NOy SCd qp `gag -YY •�°, y S� W p E ie b d V t � L G uyS q La, Yi rpp Q O Gb S.- ,Z. 14 r- LE PGY _•� � l � Cb Si....L� �� a9a GY iirq� �VY Gaywx pq yGU �, � � � M ■y �� G� IC L LV6 y�Cp ^L p� `Vy Z� u fS Z'°' Z.5 aa Ir 'y n`.. sa v w ^G�y wi y"L ow _� x �d- . `G .+ Ov YN K� CiiI L ZZX Y y O N¢ � �'� �Ti a a - "L Y 1p O p� u: .` ^ Y °nom • Y OL +Y Yg Ox _ TL LAN pub U .`rN .+ usu p� e�c Q 40 b h m q - }} N so$ L L dw Yy TH L .g .q jp®� 6u� '$a yY[N WY WY _6pY tvl Y. ° vL �.Y L YM• Yy� �V r.L C o $ OO v6 N.4 b.2 !X C ! a A VO D 94 RC L rM 3� MA a rte. tl� C La 'pE. O Y,z !w; o- r Ca mK MY ` '.. F, ^Y. Wy,.. A Ll AQ' %;: �ti IVY. yY �� a = a=u9 o gv.. �� I� YY Rte. `S n0+.4 w.= 4.., EtlW � >•C1 �. 4Ni'O.� TCM �� yY 4 , C d � <O ti M 6� V Qi O �. A M .�. •G� Re L.m O. <.SO Q DU v DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 1. CITY OF RANCHO CU'CAMONGA STAFF REPOWr JunE 12, 1991 Chairm v: and Members of tLa Planning Commission Brad Bullc.:, City ?lamer Steve Hayes, Asuc ^iate Planner t ENVIRONMENTAL - ASSESSki!NT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 1506P _- WILLIAM E!!ON COMPANY A residential tract subdivision Of r.0 lots on 124.76 acres of land to create planning areas for futtre "develop%ent of Victoria Laken South within the Victoria Planned Community, south of Base Line Road,an3 east of the fature Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 207- 161 -35, and 38 and 227- 171 -03, 08, 20, 22, and 23. S,rff recommends issuance of a Negat ve Declaration. Associated with t8i.s project la Tree Removal Permit 90 -37. PROJECT AND SITE DESC I,R PTION: 1 A. Action Recuuested: Approval of the "su,perblock" master tentative -tract map for Victoria Lakes South, conceptual grading and landscape plans, free removal perm -It, and issuance of a Negative Declaration, B. Surrounding Land Use and 2g:;ing: North - Eeigting Winery and Single Family Residential; Iow- Medium, Medium, and High Residential (4 -8, 8 -.14, and 24 -30 dwelling, units per acre, respectively). South - Vacant; Planned Rsgl =al Center. :Last - Existing Church, and Vacant; Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and offi•e Professional West Vacant; Utility C.arridor C. general Plan Deftjq ationse Project Site - Radium- Residential, High Residential and Office North - Medium and Medium .Nigh Residential South - Regional Commercial East Office and how- *tedium Residential West - Flood Control /Utility Corridor D. Site Characteristics* The entire site is. ~old of any structures.. Remnants Of a grape Viney.GSd exist. -in portions of the project site.,. _ *.seo a. windrow of Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees exist on the, northeast portion of the project site. The 1 area slopes at approximately 2 to 3 percent north to south. ITEM 'W 1 PLANNING CCMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 15060 WILLIAM LYON COMPANY .Tune 12, 1991 Page 2 I1. BHCKMOUND: The City Council approved a conesptual area a deve';,oument plan for the Lakes South arou at their mseting of March 1, 1989 (See Exhibit "A "). The area development x)lan established planning areas, land use densities, road alignments, street sections, location of psak sites, the designation and:; location of a 2.9 °icrs site for development as a community facilities site, and t:xe master plan for trails for the Lakes South. r III ANALYSIS- A. General: The purpose of this master tentative tract map is to a create planning blocks for futfire development of Victoria Lakes South. Separate applications- will be processed to further subdivide and /or develop each master parcel. Furthermore, with approval of this master tentative tract -vap, precise road alignments. street sactinae, park and trail locations will be specifically determined. Staff's analysis has primarily centered-in the following objectives, 1. Consistency of the tentative tra,:t with the Victoria Cormiunity Psan; and 2. Consistency of the design of all streets, parks, lakes and pednatrian modes with the design pa�amaterc sstabliahed by the Victoria Community Plan. > (The tentative tract is Consistent with the Lakes South area development plan in terns of arterial road systems, pa=elizat �,, lakes' design and trail design). The Lyon Company plan is to develop the Lakes South in three steps. First is the cres,#on of a "superblock" (i.e. Tentative Tract 15060), which implemsnts the overall planning concept for the Lakes South area, approved by the .area develcpcsnt plat, by cl eating individual, %%per" parcels in each of the planning areas, and dedicating road alignments for arterial arl collector roads.: Sec,ud, the developer will process individual tract subdivision snaps for each of these 4 separate parcels. These tract - aubdiviaions will subdivide each of these super parcels into individual parcels for unit develo_l-zent. The conceptual, grading scheme, internal road circulation, and trail Alignments will be established with the tract subdivision. TLS ;bird pha ,3e`bf the approval process will be the design review of epecific ,3rciucts for each of the individual tracts. (Please note thak the developer may choose i to combine the second and third stages of this process into one subdivision and design review proposal). Also, it should be noted that the 4!,sveloper is propoRing to phase the master i AM planning of tto Victoria Lakes South area into '2 phases. qW 'i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 15050 WIMIA1I LYON COMPANY I ° June 12, 1991 Page 3 Essentially, the first phase would include the Aaeter.i half of the area (which incorporates Lots I -vi and Lot,X) and Phase 2 of development wo -ld include > - .'tints. VII-Ix... B. Desicn Review Committee: On January 17, 1991,iDeaign Review Committee (MCNiel, Vallette, Coleman) reviewed the project and recommended approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. The jagged edges along the eastern edge of Parcel. VII, should be smoothed out to provide a more natural and gradual transition between the future development on Parcel VII and the trail system along the western lake edge. 2. The landscape' palette along Day Creek Boulevard through Victoria could be slightly different than the Day Creek Boulevard streetscape through the Etiwanda North area, north of Highland Avenue.' The Day creek Botilevard` street, jection within the Victoria Community Plan should be followed, with the exception of providing a dense hedgerow of fast- growing, flowering evergreen shrubs on the east side of Day Creek Boulek,; d to protect debris from blowing into the Southern California Ediron Utility Corridor, as well as to increase screening of the utility corridor frrgm public view. This hedgerow should also be continued &Icing the Gardens L�3p, BaseJT,ine Road and Church Street as needed to satisfy the screening concern. _ If a transition of strastecapR nale':te occurs, it should occur at the intersection of the future Route 30 freeway /Highland Avenue with Day Creek Boulevard. 3. The conceptual plaza design of the south terminus of Vxctoria Park Lane should include decorative paving of substantial concrete interlocking pavers, for ease of maintenance and a decorative appearance. 4. Individual- perimeter theme walls should be reviewer ' "as each ;individual tract is reviewed by t)-.e Design Review Committee. S. The developer should strew the importance of providing paseas or other pedestrian corneer -ions from each planning axet to the park /trail system. L . PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT." T1 15060 - WILLZU LYON cOMPANYl' June 12, 1991 Page 4 f , 6. Ths developer should provide all median _. landscaping and landscaping between the curb and the front of the sidewal)z for all secondary arterial streets and special'+6oulevar:;s with construction of Phase 1 streets. 7. The sidewalk should be eliminated along the east side of Dag Creek Squlevard, with the exception of _providing a walk from all future bus stops to the Nearest intersecticns, 8. The landeccApe palette, for the ='Church Street median should include landscape elements that are currently utilized wi_hin the Church Street median it Terra Vista to create consistency along the median. These comments have all been incorporated into the attached `;Resolution of Approval fctr Tentative Tract 15060. C. ;Trails Advisory Committee: On September 19, 1990, and _. s,uary 16, 1991, the Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the trail system development plans around the lakes, edges and park in accordat ^e witt, Ordinaxce 393. The Committee recommonded approval of the trail system; plans subject to the'Tollowing conditions% 1. A bicycle lane should continue south of Victoria Park Lane from Base Line Road to Victcria Gardens Lcup to provide a continuous connection with the bike lane which exista north of Base Line Road. " 2. on the legend for the concepturl estreetscape plan, the "12 font pedestrian /bicycle /emergency access" ahould be changed to a "pedestrian/ emergev, y access "— 3. The E, ,foot pedestrian/3 trail along the south r portion of the middle lake should not continus on to the intersectim of the de_omposed granito path in the 12 foot )p�!destr_an /emergency access. Ii ;stead, the 12 -foot pedestrian/ emergency access should continue in its place. 4. A 12 foot wide pedestrian /bicve a path should be provided on the west side of the lakes rather than the 8 foot path proposed. f J, E e PLANNING COMMISSION STA F REPORT TT 15060 - tWIItLIAM LYON bOMPaNY June 12, 1991; . >, Page 5 - 5. Connections from blocks III, IV, and VII should be 3rovided to,the trail system along the lakes. This should be provided when the individual tract maps L-e submitted. 6. The eastern side of the lakes should be a natural edge emphasizing the use pf native plant materials, rocks and boulders. All of these comments have teen incorporated as Conditions of Approval into thr. attached Resolution for Tentative Tract 15060. D. Technical Review Co im�ttee: On January' 16, 1991, the Committee rsvi:ewld tLe project and cetermined that, with the recommended Conditions of Approval; the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. The Grading Committee conceptually approved 'the project at its meeting of January 15, 1991. E. Tree Removal- In conjunction with the Tentative Trait Map, the applicant: has submitted Tree Removal Permit Application 90 -37 requesting the removal of Stand G, as identified on the tree removal plan (See Exhibit ^I "). The request; -for removal arises because the lc.ation of the trees confl 4n, with the construction of the eastern -leg of the Viotd'z a Gardens Loop. Since the alignment of the Victoria Gardens l''4op has been determined through previous Commission and council actions, staff feels the removal is warranted as long as replacement windrow pxanting is provided per Ordinance No. 276. In addition, staff will encourage the developer to remove all trees on the project site identified as a hazard or in a Unhealthy condition with phase one improvements. F. Environmental Assessment-. Part I of the initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has computed Part IT of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. if the Commission concurs with staff's findings, .hen issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with tha General Plan and Victoria Community : ?lar.. The project will not be Detrimental to the public heaith or safety, or causes nuisance or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the project use, subdivision map, and conceptual plans, together with the Conditions of 7.pproval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Victoria Community Plan, Development Code, and City Standards. V I l ' 7,f 'tt�TNG COMMISSION ,STArr REpOR1. "TT 'IS060 — WILLIAM LYON CCAPANY June 12, 1391 Page 5 a t V. G_L• '�pO DLNCEs This item has been aeveetisedl as a Public Hearing in the Inland Valley Daffy gaki- -W n newspaper, the project has been ,Posted, and .3tices were gent - "to all property owners within 300 £Met of the pz, ?ject trite. J j Y JJ VI. RE MM, Staff recommends, ti.at the Planning ,Commission approvs Teutttive Tract 15060 for the mastrar subdivision of "EUPOt. locks" of land throu ?h adoption of tna :attached Resolution of Approval with ConUtic-nag, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. I Respe y su tted, i Y B 11 City Planner BB.SH:ja Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization and Takes South 4tea Development Plan Exhibit "3" - Tentative Tract :tag Exhibit "C" - Conceptual StreidtsFa�f Plan Exhifiit *D" - Street Seetidns ' -��' Exhibit,-E" - Victoria Pork Law' nce ,intx Exhibit . "F" - Church Street En!rnnce Exhibit "G" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit: "H" - Phasing Plan '� Exhibit "I" - Tres Preservatiota Plan - Resolution of Approval for Tentative =Tract 15060 _ 1 v 221:DTS a a _ NAP f� GZUTY i IX NAP NAP NAP v ' 9 tt,j f l rs r %AP � lqw ill! LM 4.8. DU /AC NA* 1 F. rob F l� IJCA1�iONA TiEM:T i5t6ca PLA11T�tiIN6- 0; ION �Tii'L : Ilza- F.�.,d 4 Ow. �XHfIBTdc,�Q• SCALE: i an ri Q TE6VTATivr. TRA r Rim. 1506CJ s: w \.; 'Y OF RA14C J CC't`AMt�RTGA PLANrRG DIONIsat� LIFAHiBiT . srQ�� SfA�.£: Cpl wvl Yop -NCHO -tdCAMONCA n-B4.- fsak) 4FANNING' DI•SJON SCALE: 0701 -02 0 JUNE 123 -991 P.C. AGENDA 6 of 7 0 A J1 q y h =a�� s•�- ed � 1 � r tr U sus — Jµ , G Siff i i - ] Mi t 1i a t flj, t SFpj S C t I 1 F teiFii � � 3ttt 3ljii ;f ; • Fi e ts rJ f^ @ (i W i = ;s It: • � ti ts':tra 5 t(( i� I ,`. �ttF °F= . f } � �.s;l� � •_ 5_. � ., .. .. - 5. �i it Iii. 1.f. FI.7? r riE t w t e a tt \ D. !: tr) r. Ile z 0 ui Z -Z C6 .j fill me W Z p u CD 'Alki ca 1p � n •� tl� ..�°d tman�uw.tin. � Lu r. r - 1 uj i_ z 3 lY j _ n WT \ \� \ ✓� ` � S �,/ � _- LDT tt � �.GOr kAP UIT as�:r tOi S J lY OF TtA'i�i ®�CLTCAA40NGA LANi�tING DIVISION TM -- is� G a N EXHIBYT: 6 -f SCAY.Es �' N!/ ii 1 maq e9z n RE _.� T2'.YaPS � j NJV. Ty OF RA- fk%IO, CUCAMONGA PLANNING, DI•'*qSION - TiTLE:— Conu,r� -,�al tT aM�ry. ya., N EXHIBIT: G a SCALE: wI VV I S loos nun mw mm LOU r ,4. • � fir.' -. _ �-�1'� = _. $ lY 14 1 TY OF RANCHO•CIiCAMONGA i it'EM: 'If 1Sbbv AMPLANNJMG�.DIVISION C�/' TME:_iL1^GCLV;LTUr1o. ExHIBrI':'G'3�� SCALE VV I S li ' �' —•- - t[cT10p i.I1• atc7ION •p.p• r I _- st o •*.y nm� It— more •wx• � Y :N t 4RION'p.p. — pR1011 'I.I• ' asrnoN v.r ttaTwN ,p,e. urnew n•s• OF ra �vcl o.,CVCAMONGA FFEM—lis-31M o b v PLANMN•G- DM. SION �� s� E�,s N I SCALE: 'Al I nt-,� 'TY OF RA�Nj -1O CUCAMONGA. rrEM ,7T 15—b& v L&Wj\gNG' DPIISION TYI%E. Pk4s;.,[ rolls, N EXHIBM. n14' SCALE: i w ri PFOMW VIA 161 � r \ ACES �, �\ ,.+�+ :• � 1 Yo eE FELeovEO� i i i Ar 0 \ ! - r 1AA AL1E6 W E7(1ST EUCALYPTUS wrlmw YO BE FPESEP� IV 1. AM / v a 7 A _- _ OAt . ... _. -_�- ,. t Li4iX:l1 1 �.�_� STSEEY __ •� ' OF RA144tFI:3- CUCAMONGA rrEm: 7PfSUb� f /' PLANNING- DP ��' E:CHIBrr.' ".T" SCALE r] L;ESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. IS060, A RESIDENTIAL TRACT SUBDIVISION OF 10 LOTS ON 124.76 ACRES OF LAND, F,ND RELATED TREE REMOVAL 'PERMIT 90 -37, TO CREATE PLANNING AREAS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF VICTORIA LAKES SOUTH WITHIN T-E VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD AND EAST OF THE FUTURE DAY - BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN* 207- 161 -35 and 38 and 227 - 171 -03, 08, 20, 22, and 23. A. Recitals. (i) The William Lyon Company has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15060 as descxibQ ,in -the he of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject- Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (il.) on the 12th of June 1991, the Planning! commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing ,3n the 'application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Revolution have ot::c;urred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This, Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on June 12, 1991, includ:,3 written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located south of Base Line Road, east of the future Day Creek Boulevard, with a Base Line Road frontage of 1,167 feet and lot depth of 2,508 feet and is presently unimproved; (b) The property to the north of the subject site is an existing winery and single family residences, the property to the south of that site consists of vacant land; the property to the east is an existing church and vacant', and the property to the •_,-3t is vacant. tlV PIJWNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 15060 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY June 12, 1991 Page 2 (c:) A conceptual area development plan for the Victoria Lakes South area including primary and collector street locations, land uses, trail locations and widths, and lakes' design was adopted by the city Council on March 1, 1989, and the proposed tentative tract maintains consistency with the previously approved plan; and (d) The proposed tentative tract contemplates the creation of °superblock° -,parcels for future development, of which separate tentative tract or development review applications will be required for the future subdividing and/or development of each master parcel; and (e) The proposed 25 acre Lot 2 contemplates the development of Victoria Lakes Park, which was reviewed and approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission on August 17, 1989. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and re�rr!Tndes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development; Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is �. consistent with the General Plan, Development .Co &,- and specific plans, and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely*- to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The desigr of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of thz property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality .Act of 1970 and, further, this Commis &ion hereby tesues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions get forth in plliragraphs: 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the applicatioxt zu -ject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Y° AD PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 15060 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY June 12, 1991 Page 3 1� PLannina Division: Pursuant to provisions —of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filet anil,'.posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California °Fish and Game Code Section 911.4, together with any ,required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardin4'� The applicant shall provide the Planning Department ,ith a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees ha-1 been paid. In the event th3.,, application ,p determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, oz the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment, of any required handling charce for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 2) The master tentative tract map is approved for the purpose of creating emaller parcels for future subdivision and /or development; individual applications for subdivision and /or development of each "super block" parcel will be required. 3) The jagged edger along the eastern edge of Parcel VII shall be smoothed out to provide a more natural and gradual transition between the future development on Parcel VII and the trail system along the western lake edge. 4) The landscape palette along Day Greek Boilevard through Victoria may be slightly differed* than the Day Creek Boulevard strestscape through the Ftiwanda North area. A landscape design consistent with the intent of the' "approved landscape palette for Day Creek Boulevard in thie Victoria. Community Plan should be utilized " with a dense hedgerew of fast growing, flowerisl evergreen shrubs along the east side PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION-,:,: -:; TT IS060 — WILLIAM LYON COMka;7Y June 12, 1991 Page 4 of Day creek Boulevard to protect debris from blowing into the Southern California Edison Utility Corridor, as well as to increase screening of the Utility Corridor from pub31c view. This hedgerow should also bR, continued along the Gardens Locn, Base Line Road, and Church Street as needed to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. S) The pedestrian plaza and vehicular intersection at Victoria Park Lane and Victoria Gardens. Loop shall include substantial concrete interlocking pavers, for ease of maintananc4 and a decorative appearance. The final design of this area shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division and Engineering Division prior to map recordation. 6) Individual perimeter ;;theme walls shell be reviewed as each individual tract is processed through the development review process. 7) The developer shall provide all mediae landscaping and landscaping between the curb and the front of the sidewalk with the primary street construction and rough grading for the project (Phase 1). Details indicating these requirements shall be provided on the street Improvement and rough grading plans, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division and Engineering Division prior to the issuance of a rough grading permit. 8) The sidswa_k along the east side of Day Creek Boulevard shall be deleted with the exception of providing a walk from the future bus stops to the nearest intersections. 9) The applicant shall select landscape elements from the Church Street median in Terra Vista for use in the Lakes South area to create consistency along the median. 10) A bicycle lane shall continue south oa Victoria Park Lane from Base Line Road to Victoria Gardens Loop to provide a continuous connection with the bike lane which exists north of Base Line Road. L11 El PLANNICt COMMISSION RESOLMON NO, TT 15060 -- WILLIAM UON COW -ANY June 2a., 1991 page 5 11) On the 3egsnct for the conceptual streetscape plan, the 11240at padestrianr`bicycle /emergency access" shall be changed to a pedestrian/ emergedcy access," 12) The 8 foot pedestrian /bicycle trail along the south portion of the middle lake shall not continue, on to the intersection of the decomposed granite `path and the 12 foot smercpncy access. Ine.sad, the 12 foot pod.�riun /emergency access shall continue in its place. 13) A 12 foot wide pedestrian /bicycle path shall be provided on the want side of the lakes rather than the 8 toot path proposed.. 14) Connections prom Blocks III, IV and MY shall be provided to the trail system along the lakes at the time .individual tract maps are submitted.' 1S) The eastern side of the lakes, shall appeur as a natural edge =phasizing the use of native plant materials, rocksi and boulders, to tha satisfaction of the Planning Division. 16) The final design of all bridges, fences, walls and water elements shall be reviewed and approved ea each individual project within the Lakes South area is submitted. 17) Trail Connections and Landscaping shall be provided between the regional center and Victoria Lekee Park across the restaurant parcels (Lots IV and VI). The final design shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to the recordation of the final map. 18) The trail connection along Church Street, between the Terra Vista and Victoria Greenway Systems, shall be reviewed and approved by Southern California Edison and the Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to recordation of the final map. PLRNNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 15064 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY .c.. June 12, 1991 .. Page 6 19) Enriched pavement crossing locations shall be provided, as 'determined by the Planning and Engineering Divisions dpcing the 'rolan check process. 20) Tree Removal Permit 90 -37 is'hereby approved subject to the follo-aing conditions - in accordance with,.; the Tree Preservation Ordinance. a) Stand "G° (see Exhibit "I ") - the north /south windrow, may be removed as required to construct Victoria Gardens Loop. East. 'this Eucalyptus windrow shall be reestablished along the west side of _ Victoria Gardens hoop c,`1st, across the frontages of Late III and IV so as to not r conflict with any future drainacre or'traiL easements or required street trees. Replacement plantings of �calyptus maculata (Spotted Gum), 15- gallon size minimum, spaced at 8 feet on center and properly staNsd and irrigated 'shall be 1 provided in than area,,;behind the required Victoria Gardens Loop street trees. _ b) All unhealthy trees on site, as Identified,--"' �I by the arborist's report, shall be removed and replaced with 15- gallon Eucalyptus i Maculata (Spotted Gum) trees ,at roughly the same location as the removed trees. c) All trees proposed to remain in place shall be protectea by fencing 'around their perimeter drip lines. The fencing shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Planning, Division prioE to the issuance of a rough grading permit , d) Any wood infest$d with L-onghprn Borer,. Beetle shell be chipped, removed and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground f,-r a minimum of six months, sealing the tarn edges with 'soil, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfes_ing other trees or wood. /1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT IS060 - WILLIAM LYON CCMPANY June 12, 1991 Page 7 e) Approval of this Tree Remo,, iii Permit No. 90 -37 shall be valid fo_- a period of 9D days, subject to extenaion. The 90 days shall start from the date of final map recorder ion or grading permits, whichever comae first._ f) The Planning Division (and if applicable Engineering. Division) shull be contacted within 30 days of the planting, of -the trees to conduct an inspection. 21) Any tentative tract application for Lot I ahal ?. ` include a master plan to address circulation access to the Not A Part parcel to the east and southeast. f' Engineering Division: 1) An in -lieu fee as contribution' to the undergrounding of the ovRrhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final map. The fee shall be one -half rf City•s adopted unit amoe ?t as follows: a) For future undergrounding � opposite (north) side of _Base Lind Frc.m the centerline of Dal Creek`Bou' acterly to the east boundary of Lot IX._ b) For future, undergrounding north of Lot X, (south of Base Line Road) from the West boundary of Lot X to 272 easterly, c) For previously undergrounded utilities on the north side rf Bass Line Road from the centerline of victoria Park Lane to 262 feet west of the el9terly property line of Lot X. d) For the previously undergrounded:utilities on the north side of Base Line foi the length of the frontage of Lot I. 3} Construct the following streets full curb -to- cur: width includLLng street lights and median l..u" as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 15060 — WILLIAM LYON t''UPANY -` June 12, 1991 Page $ a) Base Line Road from Day Creole channel to Etiwanda avenue, including sidewalk on the south side from Etiwanda Avenue to Victoria Park Lane. b) Day creek Boulevard 9 `Base Lime Road to Foothill Boulevar(I..' .c c) Church Street ( ?tiller Avenue) from Day 1' Creek Boulevard t Etiwanda Avenue. d) Reconstruct the west ha ?.f of thel Etiwanda /Church intersection includincs sufficient width for left turn lanes and efdewalk within the south parkway.. e) C )ruck all parkway improvements at 'act to the Southern CallZornia Edison it on Dag creek. Boulevard (from Base fLit_ _ '� Church Street) , Base Line Road and ' Church Street (Miller Avenue). f) Sidewalk. on Day Creek Boulevard shall only be provided from the bus, sstopu to the nearest intersection. I g) Construct all parkway, improvements on Victoria Park Lane, Victoria Gardens Loop, and the north side of Church Street (Miller Avenue), except portion from Viet.':,ia Gardens Loop to Etiwanda Avenue. h) The 'd'oreloper shall be eligible for fee credits against and reimuursament from the transportation development fee for the portion of the improyements determined by the City Engineer to to of e�cpplem8ntal size# length, or.capacity over that needed for the impacts of this development, in conformance with city policy, i) The developer may request a reimbursement agreement , to recover the cost, of constructing off -site 'street improvements; not otherwise reimbursed as specified` abovei from future development/ redevelopment as it occurs on adjacent property, WAS -1i MWT I W.", n-- PLANNING COMMISSION ',RESOLUTION NO. TT 35060 WILLIAM LYON CoMpANY June 12, 199 Rage 9 3) The minimum curb separation for Victoria Garden Loop (west F?ide of the lake to Day Creek Boulevard) shall be 44 feet. The parkway width shell be 14 feet adjacent to the park and 12 feet wide on the opposite site of the street. 4) Complete the items necessary to accGmplish the relocation of Day Creek Boulevard to the west side of the Southern California Edison easement including: a) The vacation of the uni.mprcved portion( an the east side of said Basement retween' Foothill Boulevard and Church, Street (Miller Avenue)., b) Obtain the approval fo,;'and relocate the Edison easement eask <rly as necessary. C) Construct t. -a£fic signals at the intersections of Base Line Road /Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street (Miller)/Day Creek Boulevard, and Foothill Boulevard/Day Creek Boulev&=d. d) The developer shall be eligible for foe credits against and reimbu- semsat from the Transportation Development' Feoa for the construction of he traffic signals beyond those needed to mitigate the impacts of the development, in conformance with City policy: 5) Vacate the portion of Old Base Line Road located north of Lot X and neg..2tiate in good faith +aith the adjacent property owner, Nabisco, JAc. (APN 227- 111 -27) to provide legal access from Base Line to the Diamond property (APN 227- 171 -21) or ,quit clnim all rights` to any Property that would revert to Lot X following a future street vacation. 6) Drainage facilities shall be constructed generally as proposed in the approved preliminary drainage study. Mrainage yyy facilities may need to be added, altered, extended, or sizes mc- dified in the final analysis. In addition, the facilities shown as twin 96 -inch diameter Rx.p. may not be acceptable in the final analysis and the wc� q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 15060 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY June 12, 1991 Page 10 reconstruction of the existing channel parallel to the Freeway may be necessary. 7) The paseo shmin between Lots III and IV shall be labeled Lvt -'A. 8) Victoria Lakes Circle shall be eliminated as a public street and shoran as a part of Lot II. The driveway shall be So feet in width with 20- foot,. drive aisles and a 20 -foot center med,an or as otherwise approved lby the City Engineer. 9) Day C.,aek Channel shall be operational prior to - releaus of any occupancies. 10) Decorative,, pavament to be constructed within the p;Aiiia Might -of -Way shall be approved by the City .Engineer. 11 All public improvements shall be constructed with Phase I. 12) Construction of the approved park on .Parcel II shall occur with Phase I construction. Rancho Cucamonoa Fire Protection District: 1) All pathways leading to or adjobent to! the lakes shall be 12 feet wide, all weather, driving surface, capable of supporting, 70,000 GVW of fire apparatus. 2) The land bridge located between the north lake and center lake shall, meet the _requirements of Stem Number 1)." 3) Vehicular access to paths leading to or adjacent to the lakes shall have engineered approaches complying with established Fire District, standards. 4) Turf blocked "access at the Aorthwest lake perimeter shall be constructed' as to provide turning radiuses of 21 fum-L Inside and 47 feet outside. S) Vehicular access paths shall have 14- foot. vertical clearances. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 1506a — WILLIAM LYON Co"ANY June 12, 1991 Page li J 6) If access paths, are to ba locked, blq) `,ked, or otherwise reotricted, a Knox entry e.atem for padlock shall be furnished. 7) Each lake shall be furnished with a boat launching /recovery ramp, located from the side with the concrete paths. 8) A .minimum of two% \points of access shall be provided at all times to the "entire lakes `i project.' 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption' of this Resolution. it APPROVED AND AI)OPTE1U THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman I r ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the (,planning Commission of the. City c`r ".Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, gassed, and adopted by the Plar�aing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a reguliir meett114 of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of June 1991 , by t s following vote -to -wit: r AYES: COMMISSIONERS: It - NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: li h n i voTT ®IF DEPARTMENT OF MANIONG DUCAN01I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT p; 10 7 PROJECT #: 7F is-0,I SUBJECT: VtL+,1 APPLICANT: LOCATION: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714) SW1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, If building permits are rici issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to ®I 7 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. _ Is granted subject to the approval of ±� 4. The developershall commence, participate in. andconsumrnateorcausetobecomn fenced, JJ- _/_J --J--J- participated in, or consummated, a Mello -Root: Community Facilitiet: Dism(CFD) for tha Rancho Cucaimoi-va Fire PmlecUon District to ftrw -.A a a.- o action and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The staW shall be I=tod, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga F, o r +.I DLaI and shall become the Di,-trids properly upon completion. The atuipment shag be selected by the District in accordance with its neent. in a<., buildI of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final taap occurs. V11, 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the Issuance of building whichever pem>its, comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate In, the establishment of a Mello-Roos J_J_ Community Facilities District for ttx construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school dis4rirt'.tas previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alterative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing Disirkt prior to the recordation of the final map Ask or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. further, if the affected school Y district has not formed a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building perms for said project, this corriition shall be deemed null and void. sC.z,9r nnrhz3U This coeditlon shall be waived ff the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into F nagraement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a re': • this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to Issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been iscued by the water district within 90 days priorto final map approval inthe case of subdivision orprioeto Issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Develooment V/ 1. The site shall be developed artj maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architeclsval elevations, Weriormaterials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file Bn the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and Specific Plan and =Uo Vi Foeia Planned Community. P.ieet Ko.:Tr1 5060 comgjedott Date• .__J —/ --J---J- 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of fibs City Planner. 3. Occupancy ofthe facility shall rat commence until suchYmeas all UnifounBuilding" ode and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Priorto occupancy, plan,. shall be sub m. iffed to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be Inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. �V 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street Improvement plans shalfbe coordinated for consistency priortoissuanceof any pennits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,. building . etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved .;ia has commenced, wlykJwver comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall rat waiver compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Comrwnky Plans or Specific Plans in affect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site fighting plan t;hall be reviewed and approved by the City Planter and Sheriffs Department (989 - 6611) prior to the Issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent propertles. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick -up shall be for Individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 10. All ground - mounted utility appurtenances such as tranatomners. AC condensers, etc., shah 1 be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry wails, berming, and/or Landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. SC 2/91 2 er 12 W5 5 J —J _leJ— _J—Jr El 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with Am the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified In a r!°?; and concise Maner, including proper Illumination. — 118. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical condYions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prI to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Deveiopershalf upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and ResOctlons (CC &RS) shall riot prohibit the keeping of equine animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall havetheoption of keeptoel said animalsw°,thout the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments ts the CC &Rs. _ 15. The Covenants, Co,,tditions, and Restrictions (CC &Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Assoc -ation are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the Ch,, ° Attornay. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to um ;asuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy snail be provided to the City Engineer. j_ 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained bytheproperty owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of aawW. ,,hgthat each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be coraa!ned in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with Ma recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, which, -: first. The easements shall pmhibk the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.066 -G2. 18. The project contains e designated Historical Landmark. The Site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No . Any further modifications to the site including, but not united to, exterior4tteratlons andlor Interior alterationswhichaffec tiheexteriorof the buildings orstndctures , removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a rmot Yecation to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject f ; Historic Preservation Con: isslon review and approval. C. Building Design 11 SC - 2/91 1. An aDnmative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools Installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shat be included in the building plans and shatl be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. -..:T7-1 T44 a All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural —l--J treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. / 3 or 12 Y N ,J1D, P1yiw V-O,.T7 d( p Completion Date: 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances, including airoonditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shieidedtromview and the sound buttered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally irrtegrated with the !wilding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vesicular Access (indicate details on buiidirre pianos) t/ 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum, outskle dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (includiro',curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured' pavement across cYcuulation aisles Shall be providedthroughoutthe development to oonrect dweilings/un iVt- rflding ;with open spaces/ plaza4rocreational uses. _ ' 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City starick-f is ?md all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers it driveways; are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditionsand Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohi'uit parking on interior circulation aisles other than In designated visItorparking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shalt be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection district reviewand approval priorto issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape tease, rafAr to Section N.) _- t/,1. A detailedlandscape and Irrigation plan, Inckift slope planting and model home landscap- Ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a kensed tarrdscaps architectand submittedfor CkyPlanner reviewandapproval prforto the hmanceotbuilding permits or prior final map approval In the case of a custom $at aftlMolon. // 2. Existing trees requiNdto be presented In plow shall beproteVedwith aconkrinabn barder in accordancewiththet+ lurkipai Code Secewri9 .D8.t10,andsonotedonthegra rigplans. The location of those trees to be preserved in ptaca and new locations fortrantplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The appllcaretshallfoAcwallof the auborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transpWrding and triniming methods. 3. Aminlrlwmof frees pergross acre, con> prisedofMefollowfng sizes, shall beprovided within the project: % -48 -inch box oriaWr. %- 36- inchboxorlorger, °l. - 24- inch box or larger, % -15- gallon, and % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of %of trees planted within the ptoject shall be spet:imen size trees 244nch box or larger. 1/,5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at arms of one 1510ion tree for every three parking stalls, w1ficient to shade 5096 of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC - :Zj81 +6oft2 � /�� —J--/— —J--J- -J--J- -J--J- --J--J— —J--J- -j—j- --J--J— 6. Trees shall be planted inareas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 7. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 orgreaterstope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall' :, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cOverfor erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. _1/' 8. A4prly ate slopes in excess of Steel, but lessihan8feet inverticatheightandof2 :lorgreater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15 -gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope arcs; l- cm,"On or larger size shrub per each i 00 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover, in addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 :1 or greater slope shvli also includ a one 5- pillion or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees arks shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope pima. Slope planting;v quired by this section shall includes permanent irrigation system to be installed bl, -1e developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single famuy residential development, all f lop'- planting and t,ligatlon shall be continu- ously maintained in a healthy anti mndriion by thedavabpei until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Priorto releasing occupamcyfortho se units, anInspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 1U. For multidamily residential and non- residential development, property owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right -of -way. All laridscapeEd areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular paining, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and /or street trees and slope planting. . This requirement shag be in addition to the required V' 12. The final design of the perimeter parkw,rs, wags, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be Included In the required larkfecape plans and stmil be subjet:i to City Planner review and approval and coordinated forconsidUncywith any parkway tandscapingplonwhichmaybe required by the Engineering Division. ✓ 13. SI.rcial iandscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander ing sicfe�valks (w horizontal change and intensified landscaping, is required along V1 ^l4 ✓K L rnL ,) G+-44 igo -i+Vgp Cl rc %f f _1/ 14. landscaping and Irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of -way on the perimeter of this project area shag be contimiousy maintained by the developer. 15. All walls shall be provfdedwith decortive treatment. H located In public maintenance areas, the design shag be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall ba developed and aubmifted ;or City Planner review and nproval prior'to issuance of building permits. These crltedct shall encourage the natural i with characteristics of the selected tree species. 17. Landscaping and irrigation shag be designed to conserve water through the principles cf Xedscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SC•2 /91 5of12 W34 P,uttio. ?r /��co Completion Date.. — /__._/_ J_/ J_l J.—/ J_1 J-/ --! —/ J__J_ J_J F. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not apart of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with 'he Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval bythe Planning Division priorto ir-` illation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program forthls developn lent shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building promils. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes prior to occupancy and sh; , equire separate application and approval by the Planning Division priorto issuance of building Ferrnits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher 1.1m ect In a standard format as determined by the City Planar, prior to =cepfirsir a cash deposit on any proparty. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notk* of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each pmspective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on arty property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigations measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencles 1/ 1. Emergency secondary access shall be provided inaovAdancewith Rancho Cucamonga Fire ' Protection District Standard£:. 2. Emergencyaccessshallbeprovided, Maio: tenmcetnte and clear, amktimumot26feetwisde at all times during construction In accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to isatrauxe of building pemtits for combo- ..able oonstrwion, evidence shalt be submittedto the Rancho Cucamonga Fire P-M eclion District that temporary water supply for fire protection Is availabla, pealing cxmpletlon of required first protection system. 4. The applicant shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to detemnirne the appropriate type wid location of mail boxes. Muni - family residential developmernsshallprovafe zZoNd overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate "Mg. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive infoanation, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department c Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septr Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. S.^ -2/91 e002 W3f� P,6= .%o.T7') U6 a CMAM a .- —J--J— —J--J- -J—J- -J--/— _JJ _J—J P,6. �ro.TT�.SOd o I Comrdetion Date: APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989 -1863, FOR is COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L Site Development i� 1. The applicant shall compiywith the tatestadopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations In effect at the time ct issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits' or a nets residential dwelling unif(s) or major addition to existing existingunft(s),the applicant shall pay devehlpmentfees at theestahtished rate. Suchfees may include, but are not limited to: City Beauftation Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 3. Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or J� J addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, aftertractlparcel map recoc atVn and prior to issuance of building permits. , J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Unifoitn Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct twilding and zoning regulations for —1—I the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disW'4 facilities shall be fBmDvGJ, I R)d andlorcapped to comply with the Unttorn Plumbing Coe _ -.,.d Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be lotWed and shown on bui)WV plans submitted for __J_.! building permit application. K. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in aucDrdance with the Urftrn Buii6ing Code, City —J--J- Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. V 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to —�—� perform such work. /3. The development Is located within the soil erosion Control boundaf 's; a Soil Disturbance — J--J-Permit is required. Pleaso Contact San Bernardino County DepartmentofAgrdcultcre at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such penult shall be submitted to the City prior to the issua" Ci rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. i/ 5. The finallrading plans shall be completed and approved priorto Issuanze of tuildingpermids. ! —,---J— SC - 2/91 ?Of 12 K —V 6. As a c °estom -lot subdivision, the following requirements shalt be met: a. Surely shalt be posted and an agreement sxeculed guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divislo'n priorto final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate ea aments for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or aver adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c.On -site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, IeaviAa, or within a parcel relativo to which a building permit is requested, d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an Incremental or composite basis.) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shag be seeded w i native grasses orpianted with ground ooverfor erosion corntroi upon completion ofC :-�dingor some other aftemativemethodoferosioncontrol shag be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Oi Icial, In addition a permanent 1-rigatlon system shall be provided. This requirement' does not release the applicar: ! -vetoper from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17,08.0401 of the Development Codc, APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FNGINEERING DIVISION, (714) F89.1t?IB2. FOR COMPLIANCE WITH T4E FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements strap be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community traps- public p asm, public landscape areas, street trees, and pubiin drainage fwAlias as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non -pubft facilities (o nss•lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as sham on the plans arWor tentative reap. 2- Dedication shalt be made of the foNyMng, rtghts-ot-way on the pefimatsr streets (measured from street centodne): total t—on -ftI u CK. it jwi l Ed_ toWfeeton &,ol vc.leL ?o r"%-o total feet on V,6y(a G'^r,L'- toad- f a• a'i` L. 4E)' i S�"; fotal,feeton Utt- ft,,'t-, %1t✓ (...cr,: P.i= V.,.Irrl S7/G a C'"pteaoy, )M' 1 —3. An irrevocable offerof dedication for toot wide roadway easement SW be rude for all private streets or drives. V 4. Non- vehicubr access shall be dedicated to the CA forihe tokMngsjreetss_,_ 5. Reciprocal aocess easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC &Rs or by deeds and strap be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the fssrs "rf building permits, where no map is involved. SC -2/91 sor12 1# _j_.J _!_ /_ _J_J 11 J�re 04SIL Q `f A kr) _.te1 �6. Privatedrair :3e easements forcross- bt drainage shall be provided and shall bedelineated or noted on the final map. AML IV 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10 -foot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: TWe he: eby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prchibii the canstruction of (residential) buildings (or other stivaures) within thbr 6 areas designated on Me map as building restriction areas.* A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC &R's. V-8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequitciaimWor delineatedon the final map. 9. Easbments for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of -way shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach unto private property. 10. Additional street right -of -way shall be dedicated along righttum lanes, to provide a mininxum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a paralei street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The developershall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off -site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fall to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to subm'.Ul of the final map for approval, enter into an sareement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time asthe City acquires the property Interests required ford* improvements. Albk Such agroement shall provide fur payment by the developer of all costs Incuned by the City to acquire the off -site prepc .y .-terests requM In connectionwith the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costa shJI be in the foa:r of a cash deposit In ttw arnount given In an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at devoloper's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencerc:intof the aperrshsal. M. StrM tmrrovernar" 1. AI! public improvements (interiler streets, drainage facilities, cor,�nntrr ;y (rails, paseos, landscaped areas,. etc,.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AG pavement. drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right - of-way shall be constructed for all half- se,41an streets. V/ 3. C,onstrwg the followin j perimeter street improvements Including, but not linsfted to'. STREET t" CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVW SIDE WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET JIGH S STREET 'TREES COMM, TRAIT, NMEDtAN iSIAND OTHER :'lC�'�.i , i t ✓Y: � ✓i yam- i SC - 2/91 9 of 12 h/ 7 emi«y,o,MSt1G 0 1 �pierion I)am� _l —/ —J--J- -J--J- -J --- J- Notes: (t) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specific by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3 -Inch galvanfalid feel with psrllrope.. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by She City Engln6er. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all tir 9s with adequate detours during construction. A street closure permit maybe required. A cash deposit shall be provided to m-ar the enact of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the constriction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sir3ewak drains shall be Installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as spektlled by the City wighwer. I. Street names shall be approved by the City pfannerpriorto submittal forfirst plan check. 5. Street Improvement plans per City Standards for ak private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the My Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the pd- vats streets, fees shat be paid and construction permits shah be obtained from the City Engineer's Off fee In addition to arty other permits required5. 6. L"reet trees, a minimm of 15- gallon, size or larger, shat be installed per Ckyr Standards in aa:irdance with the City's street tree program. se a 2/91 10 of 12 J_.J J�h _J__J_ J!J_ JJJ JJJ� JsJJ P.oiw ;o.:71/J�4 0 Notes: ja) Medtart island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement l C ompledor. Date: reconstrucWn and over4ays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be curVilnear per STC. ,04. (d) If so market, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be proved for this ft,. _k 4 n s!) t r,rti. -I- -. 50r � j c 1. .,:,car l o••. Improvement {,,!ans and construction: a. Street improvement plans Including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer, shalt be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to WN satisfaction of ftro City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the fxrbiic and/or private street Improve- ments, priorto final map approval orthe issuance of bulling permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Ofrfze In addition to any other pemrils required. c. Pavement striplag, marking, traffic, street name Signing, and interconnect condult J_J shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduftwith pull boxes shalibeinstaliedon any newconstnnctionarreconsbuction �/JJ of major, sew-.Wary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Puil boxes shall be placed on both skies of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECRoranyotherlocations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (t) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specific by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3 -Inch galvanfalid feel with psrllrope.. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by She City Engln6er. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all tir 9s with adequate detours during construction. A street closure permit maybe required. A cash deposit shall be provided to m-ar the enact of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the constriction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sir3ewak drains shall be Installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as spektlled by the City wighwer. I. Street names shall be approved by the City pfannerpriorto submittal forfirst plan check. 5. Street Improvement plans per City Standards for ak private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the My Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the pd- vats streets, fees shat be paid and construction permits shah be obtained from the City Engineer's Off fee In addition to arty other permits required5. 6. L"reet trees, a minimm of 15- gallon, size or larger, shat be installed per Ckyr Standards in aa:irdance with the City's street tree program. se a 2/91 10 of 12 J_.J J�h _J__J_ J!J_ JJJ JJJ� JsJJ 7. Intersection line of site designs She" aviecwed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted polLy. a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for ail project intersections, including drfi Sways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outsize tho lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential str6et intersections shall have their notieeabil -y improved, usually by moving the 2 +/-closest street trees on each sideawayf im the street and placed inastreet tree easement. 8. A permit shall be cblained from ^,ALTRANF, for an work within the following Y right- of-vray 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of building permits: N. Public Maintenance Arose L� t. A separate set of landscaapa and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of bulking permits, whichever c(zurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District* !! 1 �/SLy fG,$G /'at�l Hr+.l .Gayly:.: :�i �. dJc GCw •� �.n,4K Ji N„ll eL..41 ' /1. '.�4s 7 _!/ 2. A signed consent and waiverform to join andtorform the appropriate Landsc.pe and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer priortofinet map approvalor issuance orbuitding permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be home by the developer. ✓ 3. All required public landscaping and Inigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. ✓ 4. Parkway landscaping an the following atreet(s) shall oordorm to the results of the respective Beautification Mast r Plan: �•'I ,ilo. C..esl!�J� l�cfii.,ti / .r✓ .ewC 0. Drainage and Flood Cants of i L,' t. Ths project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood Protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered CBvii Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare alall necessary reports, plans, and hydrolog;c thydraulic calculations. A Conditional Lette- of Map Rsviskm (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map appro +al or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A LaKer of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or Improvement acc€pfanco, whichever occurs first. —f 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occur. first. Al! drainage facilities shall Na it stalled as required by the Cirj Engineer. ::x`2,91 irons V/40 P,i,m \o.TT15040 QnRladm Date: 1, J Jr --J_ —J_ —J_ Pmaea NO. O G O 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within ffsright- of- way. mc 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6. Public stone drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a -�—/ b"age In a sump catch basin on the irlblic street. i p. tftflNieS . 1. PMAde separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power,telephons, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance vrith im Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. The deNelopzee shall W responsiblo for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. ,/ 3. Water and Sewer plants shall be designed and constructed to inset the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the EmilronmentEl Health Depart_ment.of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of ' compliance from the COWD Is required prior to final map approval or!ssuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Q. Gemara( Requirements and Approvals 1.The separate parcels contaln*d within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior 1 issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for r joint use driveway shall be provi3ed prior to final map approval or Issuance of building penr&, whicheever occurs first, for., 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit sIVA be posted Win the City covering the Astimldtd Cost Of apponiorsng the assessment3 under Assessment District &v:1 g 1.14 rawly created parcels. 4. EtlwandarUn Sevafne Area Regional Mainline, Sean dacy Regional, and Master Plar< Drainage Fees shall Lee paid priorto final map approval or prior to building permit Issuance It no mall Is involved. S. Permits shalt be obtained from the fo@owft agencies for work within their right -of -way: 6.A signed consent mW waiver form to join motor form efne Law Enforcement Faarrties DWrld shall be filed with tho City Errs, sneer prier to final map approval or the issuance Of !)Ulk ing pemtits, whichever occurs first. t°onnation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 7. Prior to frnaflMlon of any development phase, sufficient €rnpravement plans shall be com- pleted beyond cite phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of tits City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot fines shaven on the Rpproved tentative reap. SC -x /A1 12 of 12 W41 ,_/_J, �j RED HUL.GREEN HOHEOHNERS ASSOCIATION Rancho Cucamonga, California June 12, 1991 To Whom it may Concern: At a regular meeting of the board of Directors of the Red Hill Green HomeGwners Association, it was moved, seconded and carried to support' the concept of the development plans by Arroyo de los Osos for the area known as Sycamore ilillage, The Red Hill Green Condominiums are located jtkt to the north of the proposed development and partly adjacent to the development. We have been concerned with the type of development use of this property and are impressed with the concern by the owners to keep the architectural and envirc,zental integrity of the development in line with the general' cencclt of our residenrcial project and in.keeping with the nature of the present building housing the restaurant Sycamore Inn. The lovely trees in the area will be maintained and others added to the complex. , The developers have gone out of their way to keep our Board of Directors informed from time to time as progress has been made in their plans. we appreciate this concern for their neighbors. Georgia W. Kuettle Secre y, Board of Directors 4 n r-7 IE DATE: T0: FROM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM June 12, 1991 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil 'Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL VAP 13962 - ARROYO DE , LTD-. Liubdi ision of acrEs of an n o parcels i57-tfie—Specialty ' Com!aercial District of Subarea 1 of The Foothill Specific Plan located on the north side, of Foothill Boulevard between. Baker Avenue and Red Hill Country Club Drive - /LPN: 2d7- 191 -13, 16, 24, 25 and 41 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTInN: A. Action Requested; Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as oam on Ex i °B" 6. Parcel Size: Parcels range in size from 0.4 acres to 7.O acres. C. Existing Zoning: Specialty Commercial District - Subarea 1 of the`'Foothill Specific Plan. D. Surrounding Land Use: North - Existing Condominium Complex South - Existing Commercial Businesses] East - Vacant Test Existing Commercial Development E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North — Medium Development District (9 -14 dwelling un is per acre) South Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan,, Subarea 1, Community Commercial East Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Subarea 1, Specialty Commercial West - Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Subarea 1, Specialty Commercial zTEax I r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 1't TENT PM 13962 - ARROYO DE LOS OSOS, LTD: June 12, 1591 Page 2 F. Site Characteristics: The/.`site contains the Sycamore Inn, Red ie to and na Alley Restaurant. There is a grove of mature trees located mostly on the west half of the property. The sc!jthern face of Red Hill is on the northern portion of the property. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this parcel map is to create 8 parcels for the development of an office /retail center with a separate parcel for the .existing Sycamo -e Inn.. Devei�pment plans for Phase I are on tonight's "agenda as CUP 90 -20. 'Foothill Boulevard is to be Improved along the project: frontage with the exception of approximately the easterly 350' which is to be deferred until development of the adjacent property. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Mtud�,ta conducted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse 'impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result :of this project. Thereforeo issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. 1 IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Nearing have been sent to surrounding property rty ovineerrs and placed in the Inland Val. -ey Daily Bulletin. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider ill input angel ements of the Tentative Parcel :Map 13962. : , If -after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer SRH:BK:dlw Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity ,Map - Exhibit "B" - Tentative Map Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval Kjl Lu �yI V Y3 Sj Ir 01 CX CL ' Ld r - ' C-,. 07 i5 e 05M', /_4 y CO CV O lip- P —i 11604 z z P` ui ;74 T ��1111 sill I IC r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13962, LOC.'ZED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN BAKER AVENUE AND RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB PrIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207 - 191 -13, 16, 24, 25, anf? 41 WHEREAS, Tenti�cive Parcel Map Number 13962, submitted by Arroyo De Los C'sos, Ltd., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 8 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 207- 191 -13, 16, 24, 25, and 41 located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Baker Avenue and Red Hill Country Club Drive; and WHEREAS, on June 12,- 1991: the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- uescribed map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings hays been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision, is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmen,!:al damage or public health problems or have advers: r;.ffocts on abutting properties. SECTION 2: This Commisaion finds and certifies that the project has been reviowed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1976,, and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Numb 23962 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions ;the following Special conditions: - -- 1. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21009(b;, this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be iss+ied or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding th( associated PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT PARCEL MAP 13962 - ARROYO DE LOS OSOS, LTD. June 12, 1991 Page 2 2. 3. 4. S. 6. 7. environmental action is filed and posted with the Clark of the Hoard of Supervisors of tha County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Came Code Suction 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid,to the County Clerk of the County of San Bornardino.,,i The appiicanti ,,shall provide the Engineering Depar`.ment wjZi a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a isceipt showing. that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exempt fr such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of t e California Fish and Game Code,,,, or, the guidelines ,,romulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. The existing overhead utility (telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of FOOtbill(,1BOule*Ard shall be undergrounded (all poles along the project frontage shall be removed) prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City's adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. Construct the full north half street imprcvementri:_`= Foothill Boulevard except for the easterly 350* feet which may be deferred until development of the adjacent - property or construction is feasible. A lien agreement shall be submitted to guarantee future construction of the deferred street improvements. Provide right -of -way and construct right turn lanes for both project dri.vaways.' Provide a bus bay west of the main entrance. An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future construction of the median island landscaping within Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the approval of the final parcel map. The amount of the fee shall be one -half the cost of the landscaping times the length of the project frontage. Reconstruct the San Bernardino Road intersection and upgrade, modify, or relocate traffic signals# as necessary, to the satis %ction of the City Engineer. M, 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ,r TENT PARCEL MAP 13462 - ARROYO DE LOS OSOS, LID. June 12, 1991 Page 3 S. Acquire necessary ea6ements and construct Master Plan $corm D:•ain Line 32 -3, including interception Sciliticls from the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive southerly to meet .-the existing portion south of the Southern Pacific Railroad. The developer may receive fee credit and request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent Master Plan facilities in accordance with City Policy.' 9. The developer shall make a good faith effort te. acquire the required off -site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail, to do so the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by, w3 City to acquire the off -site property inter -^.t9 required is connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of those 0-ace shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal rt,nrt E!jtainsd by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 10. An access easement in favor of the property to the east shall be provided, 11. obtain an easement and construct the joint ,use driveway located adjacent to the west project boundary. 12. A permit shall be obtained from the Southern Pacific Railroad Company for work within their right -of -way. 13. Reciprocal parking shall be provided by CC&Rs. 14. Prior to recor6ation of the Parcel Map or the issuance of any grading or tree removal permits, the applicant ahall develop and submit for review and approval by the Planning Commission a comprehensive long -term plan for the perpetuation, management, and maintenance of the Sycamore Grove. This plan shall acknowledge the importance a' the grove as a community environmental and historical resour*e--, nd provide a detailed and tangible program for the protection and perpetuation of thin resource. `X J j�(` PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NOa TENT PARCEL MAP 13962 - ARRO11.) DE LOS OSOS, LTD. June 12, 1991 Page 4 Following ap$<;dval of this plan, the owner and the City shall enter into a legal and binding agreement, stipulating to abide by the provisions of this plan, j to be recorded . =ncurrently with the Parcel Map, and to run with the land. Compliance with the terms of this agreement shall constitute a prerequisite for the continued use of the site as approved under the Conditional Use Permit. I{ APPROVED ANn ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. i PLANNING COMMISSION Oil THE CITY OF RANCHC.. CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. MCNiel, Chairman ATTEST- Brad Buller, Secretary rf I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the pity of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, atria regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of Juno 1991, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: - COMMISSIONERS: NOW: COMMISSIONERS: i ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i `X J j�(` F Y r v v u� I u D v � H x i N ~ 2Y OCG. C2 ya ! �_ �p _ ��VVVJLJLJL 'a , •Y Al T Y. L.� D E Ga`r, 4W ML `py QC4 N'.y Ly r.. Yi u$$ � €2 .° c• �` q •.. r.0 �..j ' � F °10. > e • p� G P�"'1 • C A �°1CY CC ^t °1 "g- t-. L9 C °.°G 27g Y° w ^y EV ^ E$ &-- -r,= it ° -:n'u in u' F.'i u§ .°ems l = -X s a e= P� z Av 1 f d � V V O °C 4� ; Y. � i Y GG G L°iN C� �Cai.9 t.Ol CC L -0Q <4. va t r 1 °_ v VI c a _ rat 6 ` Y O O Bpi 't >A' O.Y L Vri VOL y 3L 21 J=I IS lt bb e y y� C _ pCOy1 j tl `g E5 � �a a �x _�� .� y� `g ,�,• �cd • ".. a !' =42 S3 zz tl qN s• CCtlC tl •� i 5 'ate ri ~�. �►`. n � . s ...mac er _��r �r�i'' <.S ®: an.� ' A 1I J_�' � DATE; TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF R.. PORT j June 12, 1997 Chairman and Memb =rs of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Stove Hayes, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL AcdIESSMENT AM CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90 -2 Y nY0 AE LCI& OSOS. LTD. - The development of 17:04 a_res for a mixed office /commercial master plan, consisting of 11 office /retail buildings totaling 190,950 square feet with Phase R development consisting of E two- story office /retail buildings :totaling 113,450 square feet on 3`.21 acres of land in the Specialty Commercial District of Subarea 1 of the Foothill •oulevard Specific Plan, ?ocrted o; side of Foothill Boulevard between Baker Avenue and Red Hill, - Country Club Drive - APN: 207 191 -13, 16, 24, 25, and 41. Stuff recommendA, issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. Associated with this project is Tree a =oval Permit 91 -19 C,�td Tentative Parcel Map 2.396':. T. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Reguested: Approval aE a Conditional Use Permit; Phase 1 site, landscape, grading plans, ane_ building elevation;, Phase Two master site plan; and a Tree Removal Permit and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use And Zoning: North - Existing condominium .,Welopmsnt and golf course; Medium Residential (S-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Existing commercial busirpao"; Community Commercial and Specialty Commercial Zones, Subarea 1 of the I'oethill Boule :Yard. Specific Plan East - Vacant; Specialty Commercial zone, Subarea l of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan West - Existing Commercial and single Homily residential development; Spec3•zlty Commercial Jone, Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan C. General Flan Designations: Project site commercial North - �,= Residential and Public Facility 1 South - Commercial 1 East - Commercial : Vest - Commercial ITEM Y A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP. 90 -20 - ARROYO DE LOS OSOS Jane 12, 1991 Page D. Site Characteristics: The 17 acre site currently containo the Sycamore Inn, Red Chief Motel, China Alley Restaurant, a private residence, and adjacent narking areas. In addition, a grove of 82 mature trees (mostly California SycamoresH in concentrated on the western half of the pr�:iperty. Also, sn inactive Cucamonga County Watcr .Diatricr.:, concrete- lined reservoir is located on the eastern part of the site and a water tank 'exists on top of Red Hill, in the north ceil.Itral portion of the sits,. Existing gradca -on -rite range fvom a north /south - slope of i )ughly 3 percent in the Southwest and south central area to t north /south slope of a'.,er 30 percent for the southern face of Red Hill, which occuis in the north central anri northeast portions of they project. site. I E. Parking Calculations,. Numobe•J of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required XKoZjded ' PHP_SE 1: office / Admin. 91,675 1/250 367 367 Specialty Retail 14,275 1/250 f;7 57 Restaurant 7,500 11100 75 AWL (sit -down) TOTALS 113,450 499 499* , *See parking analysis for clarification. ,I PHASE 2 Office /Admire. 60,000 112so 240 245 Restaurant 17,500 1 /100 1775 175 (sit -down) TOTALS 77,500 415 420 TOTAL (BOTH PHASES) Offico /Adman. 151,675 1/250 607 612 Specialty Retail 14,275 1/250 57 57 Restaurant 25.000 1/100 90 'I TOTALS 190,950, 914 919 j F. Aooli,rqL_blee Regulations. Within any Specialty Commercial center in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, a conditional V U.;a Permit is required when over 50 percent of thu gross floor area is proposed for at°ce and administrative use,,subject to f the Commission's findings that the development -meats the intent of the Specialty Retail zone, is a benefit to the community, and furthers the goals of the Foothill Boulevard AWL Specific Plan. I� f • is • AUk ( PLANNING COMMIO91ON STAFF REPORT CUP 90 -20 - AFRC'.O BE LOSS 7SOS June 12 1991 Page 3 II BACKGROUND: On September 19, 1990, the City Council requested that a Historic Landmark application be submitted to the city to include a potential landmark designation for key elemenf-s within the Hear Gulch area (the Sycataore Inn, significant treesi= the Oso Bear Monument, potential 'archaeological features, etc.) prior to the issuance of any permits+ for the buildings associated with the Sycamore Village Project. In turn, the Red Chief Motel and Cafe was not to be included in the historic landmark designation, thereby acknowledging that their future demolition could occur. , Please refer to the attached City Council Staff Report dated September. 19, 1990, for further information on the landmark issue. III,: ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop a two -phase master plan consisting of a six building, 113,450 square Poot Phase 1 for office and retail uses, and a potential Phase 2, which includes a :, ndditional 60,000 square feet of office space and two resti Grant pads totaling 17,500 square - feet. The applicant proposes to develop the two-story buildings "A" through "E" and the two -story building "G" with underground parking as Phase 1 (see Zxhibit "D "). Phase 2 is intended to be for muster planning purposes only (see Exhibit "C "); specific approval of any or all buildings within this phase will require review through the development review process at a late- -date. The overall site plan design was derived based on a number of existing site conditions. First, the Sycamore Inn is proposed to remain intact and become the local point of the project. Buildings "A" through "E" have been situated to complete an internal courtyard, with the Inn at one end, thereby emphasising :he importance of the restaurant. second, all the buildings and parking areas have been plotted to preserve as many of the healthy California "Sycamore trees aw, possible, with a number of the outstanding specimens located in the courtyard betw€an buildings "A" through "F." Finally, the proposed structures have been intentionally ..kept off the side of Red Hill, which is a significant natural landform. The primary driveway location and configuration is a result of numerous in.ertRetion ,studies provided by the developers, traffic consultant (see Exhibit "I "). The driveway cut and trrffic signal will he in approx±mately the same location as they currently are, however, the angle of the intersection will be closer to perpendicular with Foothill. Soulevwzrd, thereby making turns into the driveway from westbound Foothill Boulevard easier. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90 -2J - ARROYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 4 �J The internal circulation system has been designed to satisfy all Fire District and Engineering Division policies. The pedestrian circulation system is separate from the vehicular drive aisles. The proposed underground parking area under building ° "G" complies with all Fire District circulation requirements. B. band Use Compatibility: The entire site is within the Spe+.ialty Commercial District of tlw� Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, which encourages land uses which promote a special landmark quality or create a special ambience unique to a partica3ar subarea. Ths Special y Commercial Land Use category allows a mix of office any: commercial uses to "faeilita1-e an interactive office /commercial environment." This sits is entirely within the Bear Gulch Activity venter, where the intent is to focus on the existing restaurants (i.e., Sycamore Inn, Magic Lamp) and to provide similar :and /or complimentary uses. A promotion of a village, pedestrian- orient,d atmosphere is ;paramount to this specific activity centf- ,In analyzing the proposed use breakdown, it .should be noted that "ancillary office uses" would normally be less tun 50 percent of the proposed building area. An noted earlier, over 50 percent office apace in this zone requires a Conditional Use Per.At. The propo. :s - -is, for approximately 81 percent office in Phase 1 and 79 percent upon completion of the entire master plan. The architect is proposing to c-:eate an interactive office /commercial environment by utilizing the Sycamore Inn, creating retail and res',Aurant space, and introducing extensive pedestrian walkways separate from the main drive aisles. By mixing office employees on the same site with restaurants and other retail uses, there will be potential for reducing automobile trips and creating more pedestrian activity within the Bear Gulch Activity Center, as intended by the Foothill Euulevard Specific Plan. Because of the sensitivity and uniqueness of this site, staff can support ;xls specific request to increase office area in this project sivice adequate commercial areas will be provided on -s to to sacilitate- the intended interactive office /commercial environment. C. Sycamore Grove Pereetuation Conceot and Plans Au noted earlier, a mature grove containing 82 trees, predominantly California Sycamores, exist on the western half of the project site. eased on previous discussions with both the Planning Commission and the Historic - Preservation commission, staff considers this grove f3 be an importan -4" community and historical resource. NW 1( PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF 'REPORT CUP 90 -20 ARROYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 5 During workshops with the Planning_ Commission, the ownera indicated that their intention is to preserve as much of the grove as possible, not only because of its intrinsic value to the community, but also as a component necessary to the commercial success of the project and the existing Sycamore Inn. Because of the importance of the 'grove to the site and the community, staff felt that four key elements should be addressed prior to the removal of any trees or the issuance of any construction permits. These are: 1. An impartial assessment of the condition of the grove; 2. A sensitive development plan 'respecting the grove as a whole, and preserving as many individual trees as possible; 3. A detailed grove perpetuation plan outlining the protection- of trees during construction phases, and regulating the management, maintenance,, and perpetuation of the grove in the long -term; and Aft 4. A legally binding agreement between the owners and the City ensuring implementation of the perpetuation plan. A brief description of these four elements follows: The original arborist report requested by staff found that many of the existing trees are in a state of decline and several were identified to be a "living bazard.11 The report indicated that it is not likely that many of the trees can be maintained- alive for an extended period whether or not the site is developed. As a result: staff had requested a review by another firm to obtain a 'broader point of view. Although there is some question as to timing, the two arborista; concur that without an active perpetuation program, the grt will continue to decline and, evet,zually cease to'exiat as.;a viable resource. In light of this, ther'epplicant has developed a site plan and a concept for the perpetuation of the grove. The site developm ?nt plan, as proposed, attempts to preserve, -.a majority of the trees in the short term. This is- accompliched through careful placement of buildings and circulation areas and the use oZ permeable surfaces such as interlocking pavers in arenas of trunk concentration. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90 -20 ^ ARROYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page fi sixteen trees (12 of ,which are Sycamore) of the 8,1 existing mature trees on- site are ,;proposed for removal due to development- related activity. These are designated as Category 1 trees,.aa and�n on Exhibits "a -Z" through "H -3." Category 2 trees are thoee,which will be preserved as interim trees during aonstructiois '., They will be protected until new trees, planted during tha' landscape phase of the project, reach maturity. Category 3 traee are intended to be preserved in the long- term, until they too reach a state of decline when replacement becomev necessary. `j The concept is based on the premise th,,?t the grove as a whole, rather than individual treat, is thel living resource worth preservation. Its long -term survival will depend on a comprehensive program relying in part on removal of individual declining specimens as their replacements reach a'given point of maturity. If the commission can smapport the proposed Sycamore Grove Perpetuation Plan in concept, staff will work with the englicant and the arborist to finalize the specific criteria neessary to make the concept work. To ensure that this takes plice, the following Condition of Approval is included in the suygesterj.Resolution: 1 Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map orrthe issuance of amy grading or tree removal permits, the applicant shall develop and submit for review and approval by theme -. Planning C-mmission, a comprehensive long -term plan 9r the perpei:uation, management, <<:d maintenance of trio j Sycamore Grove. This plan shall acknowledge 4�Ae importance of the grove as a community, environment'41, and historical resource¢ and provide a detailed Iand tangible program for the protection and perpetuat!on of this resource. r` Following aaproval of this plan, the owns and the City shall enter into a legal and bin_,•✓-'g agreement, stipulating to abide by the provisions of this plan, to be recorded concurrently with the Parcel Map, and to run with the land. Compliance with the terms of this agreement shall constitute a prerequisite for the continued use of the site as approved under tho Conditional Use Permit. PLANNING: COMHISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90 -20 - ARROYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 7 In conjunction with the Conditional Use Permit, the applicant has submitted Tree Removal. Permit 91 -19 for the removal of lu mature trees within the P1 ase 1 parking areas and building envelopes. Although a majority, of the trees .proposed for removal have bean identified as unhealthy by the arborist report, staff would suggest that the approval of Tree Removal Permit Lug deferred pending approval of the ,final perpetua�ion- plan. D. Grading: As previously mentioned, &,!'0 percent slope forming Red Hill exists an the property across the north central and northeast portions of the4;oite. in accordance with the intent of the Hillside Ordinance, this area should appear as natural as possible. However, the construction of Building its excavated'-'' underground parking garage, proposea> a substantial cut into the base`off'Red Hill. To mitigata.., "the ' impact of the cut, the slope behind this building wi!;ll be graded with the natural contours of the land, avoiding an _ evenly distributed elope and providing a aeries of terraced retaining walls not exceeding 4 fact in height that are architecturally integrated with the buildings. These walla will be oil the lower portion of the slope,' not visible from Foothill Boulevard and include adequate room for landscaping between the walls. The landscape architect is proposing native species of groundcovers, shrubs and trees to enhance the natural appearance of the elope to hide any =squired swales nor ether drainage apparatus. By doing the increased excavation for Building "G ", the original intent of viewing Red Hill as a natural landform will be met with only minimal interruptions to the slope of Red Hill. E. Barking; Based on the proposed building area and use b:teal-9own, Phase 1 of the project is required to have 499 parking spaces. Staff calculates only 497 spaces on the Phase I Site Plan. However, providing an additional two spaces, or a reduction in equivalent 'floor area, is included as a Condition of Approvm for Phase 1. In light of the Plansiing Commission's previous discussions concerning parking within retail centers, it should be noted that the project has been designed to rest only the minimum parking requiremcants -, 499 'spaces. The project makes no provisions for other uses requiring more intensive parking such as barbsr and beauty shops, medical offices, optometrists, health spas, or other uses typically found within these types of developments. The applicant indicated at one of the workshope that floor area in Phase 2 could be adjusted as necessary to address this issue. PLAXINING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90 -20 - ARRO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 8 �1 F. Design Review Committees The Design Review "ommittee reviewed the project on three separate occasions, with the most recent review occurring on May 16, 1991. At that time, the Committee recommended Apprcyal of the project subject to the following: 1- The revised south elevation s','�ternative for Building "G" should be pursued with the followinq conditions: r ` a. The window and door treatment used on s,.,- ,pentagonal entrance alternative should be util ae3.`r`,' b. Low stone or concrete cspped cheek walls should be provided -ro flemic the main entry stairway. Potted plants should be utilized at the upper and lower terminus of the cheek walls, to the satisfaction of t'ie City Planner. Z. The wood members used to accent the c,,ztral roof gable should be more substantial to` -- •appear in proportion with =other wood elements of the building. d. 'wheelchair ramps for handicapped access should be shown on the revised Building "G" elevations. e. A detail of the exposed ceiling rafters above the primary antranca should be provided. f. The stone areas behizQ1 the low stcie planters on the south elevation may be replaced with wood siding. All courtyard buildings should include stone bases _ to reflect the heritage of,crafteman architecture, 2_ The east elevation of Building "G" should be revised to be in substantial conformance with the revised west elevation. 3. The gable roof accent detail should be revised to include _ return timbers, plates, and ledgers where the wood frame accent element returns to the building wall. 4. The window trim should be upgraded to a minimum size of 2 -inch x 6 -inch for all buildings. 5. All railings within the project should be changed to reflect the new dEesigs reflected on the Building °G" elevations. 6. The post bear, cage detail on the courtyard buildings should be modified to•.'4ese contemporary design. UX G �i f 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' CUP 90 -20 - ARROYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 9 `l 7. All courtyard building windows sho,ci be similar in design (shape, mullion use) to windows on- Building S. The architect should prepare a three - dimensional rendering of the courtyard elevation for Buildings "A" f and "B." 9. A detail of the termination boitween the wood siding and window framing should be reviewed and approved by the -r/ Planning Division dur?Ag the plan checking process, with the preference that the wood siding tie into the window framing as opposed to the window framing placed over the siding. These recommendations have been include -i as Conditions of Approval. G. Technical Review Committee: On March 20, 1991, the Committee reviewed the project and determined fiat, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project` is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. The Grading- Committee found the grading plan to be technically acceptable on March 19, 1991, and recommended approval at its meeting of June 4, 1991. ft. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant, Staff has completed Part I1 of the Environmental Chec''.ist and found that although the project could hsve a significant effect on the environment in several areas, including traffic, soils and geology, and cultural resources, there will not he a significant effect on the environment in this case because of the mitigation measures which have been incluftd as Conditions of Approval within the attached resolution. Therefore, if after reviewing the proposed mitigation measures specified within the resolucica the Commission concurs with staffs findings, then issuance of a mitigated Negative Decleration would be in order. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order -fzm the Planning Commission tc approve the project* the following facts for findings .must be made: A. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, tha objectives of the Development Code, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which ti L- site is located. B. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Vq I PLANNING COMMISS?flN STAFF REPORT l CUP 90 -20 +- ARROYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 10 C. The proposed ''use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Foothill Boulevs2d n Specific Plan. V. 9PMAPONDENCE: hiv),stem has been advertised as a public hoe'ring in t4e inland VrAlev Daily Bulletin} newspaper, t'n_:, project) nae bee, 'posted, and notices =sere sent to all propertf Lwners within 300 feet of. the project site and all prol_rty oamers within Subarea l of the Foothill Boulev4rd Specific Plan. The attached letter (see Exhibit "M ") from a resident opposes tLa p oject based on traffic concerns. \,T ECOMMENDATION, staff recommends that the Commit sion receive all public testimony on the project. If after receiving all testimony, the Commission Concurs with the findings 'suggested, Yher, issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of Conditional, Use Pe=!.t 90 -20 through adoption of the attached Reso'zition would be in order. ReL, vctfull% ubmitted, Brad Buller City Planned BBasa /jfe Attachments: City Council Staff Report dated September 19, 3990 Exhibit "A" - Site Utilizatian Exhibit "8" - Yaster Plan Exhibit "C" - Prase 2 Site Plan Exhibit "D" - „Phase 1 Site Plan Exhibit ”" ° ' Conceptual Landscapes plan , Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit *Pr - Site Line Analysis Exhibit "B" — ..Tree Perpetuation Concept exhibit "I" - Intereaction,; �:q•; ' Uhibit "J" - Builning 'Eleval lane Exhibit "F" - Archttectural Letaile Exhibit "L" - Letter From Applicant Exhibit "M" - Letter from Mr. Don. Olsen , Resolution of Approval with Conditions y 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STF,EE REPORT DATE: September 19, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Anthea Hartg, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: POLICY DIRECTION FOR THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGARDING LANEMARK DESIGNATION FOR THE BEAR GULCH AaEA - A request for policy direction regarding a potential Landmark Designation for the Bear Gulch area which would include the Sycamore Inn, the significant trees, the Use Bear statue and potential archaeological resources (the site of the proposed Sycamore Village project) but exclude the Red Chief Motel and Cafe. tCCUA,4� t S�-o RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council consider the applicant's proposal and direct staff to condition the project requiring submittal of a landmark application prior to the issuance of building permits for any portion of the Sycamore Village project or prior to any sale of the land to a third person or entity. BACKGROUND: The Historic Preservation Commission forwarded to the Coatncil a request for direction regarding potential landmark designation the Sycamore Village site at tbt - eptember 5, 1990 meeting. The - Co�incil continued this item to thei September 19, ?,190 meeting ar directed staff and the project's owners, Arroyo de Los tus Partnership, to enter into negotiations regarding the feasibility of such landmark designation, The two aforementioned parties met on September 7, 1990 and the owners drew up a letter summarizing their position (see Exhibit A) . ANALYSIS: In the course of discussion, staff and Arroyo de Los Oscs Partnership representatives concurred that three options exist regarding the designation of the Sycamore Village site: that the designation rocess be initiated immed%itely; that landmark designation be a condition of approval to be met before building permits are filed; or At a landmark designation application i-, not filed. The owners agreed tc, support and initiate a ' andmark application after the project has i irgore the Planning Comr, ,sion and Cot+ncil's review and approval �.Ut re the issuance of any :.gilding permits. Staff aswaged the owner's cerns that any such designation would interfere with the interior of Sycamore Inn by agreeing that the future landmark desionation would <��Wify thr Historic Preservation Commission's review of exterior changes onl, CIT.v COUNCIL �.TAFF ,, ?T BEAR GULCH ARtA September 19, 1990 Page 2 CONCLUSION: Based upon staff's understanding of the Council's September 5, 1990 discussion regarding landmark stat,.s, the compromise of conditioning the project with: the submittal of a landmark application for the Bear Gulch area, the preservation of a majority of the mature trees on 'Zhe propei`ty, and historic mitigation, appear to fit with the Council's direction. Therefore, staff recommends that the,, Council Onsider the above proposal and would "lcome any further direction you may offer. y sub 'led, Re;Pnner Bra q q q � City BB:AH:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter toJ the `'Mayor and City,touncil from Verne Hinrichsen and Richard Crean 5097 Via Verde Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 September 12, 1990 The Honorable Dennis Stout, Mayor The Honorable William Alexander, Councilperson The Honorable Charles Bouquet, Councilperson The Honorable Deborah Bz -liwn, Councilperson The Honorable Pam Wright, Councilperson CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Ra•.icho Cucamonga,, California 91730 Re: The Sycamore village Project rroposed by Arroyo de Los 0XON Dear :- '.ayc-r stout and Fellow City Councilpersons: Thank you for your concern and your kind words regarding the Sy -amore Inn at the public hea.ing on September 5, 1990, It is gratifying to know Chaff; mjr work all these years has not gone unnoticed in the community. The issue regarding landmark designation For the Sycamore Inn or t }ie surrounding site is one that I personal:1y foe', strongly about. I have avoided local, state or I Landmark designation for the Sycamore "Inn all these years for Aany reasons. Because of the care with which we have always * szted t`: huildingu and the site, I beliaved tzat such a designs +ion was un✓,,ucessary. Now that my son -in -lam, Richard Crean, is processing his develrpment proposals for the site, I firmly boliev; that landmark status would be costly and inconvenient. I have also been uncertain about what impact: landmark designation night have o-- a prospective lender or partner. My concern over landmark stk\t°ss was heightened by the recent consideration of the Red Chiof Motel snd tae China Alley Restaurant as historic landmarks. My concern over landmark status may well change over time as the planning evolves and approvals are granted by tae City. The compromise that I wasld propose !or your consideratlon would be to allow the current conceptual master pion and site approval for Phase 1 of the Sycamore Village project that has been submitted by Arroyo de lee Ojos to continue to be processed it.hrough the Planning Commission and the other City bodies which would normally have jurisdiction over the zeview of that project:. We don't currently plan on selling tho project trt would like to ho13 the project In the family into the indefinite future. However, prior to the time that we would cal], on the City to issue building permits for any portion of the Sycamore Village project:, or prior to the time that we would complete a sale of the land to any third person or entity which woul•'_ involve our loss of control o -er the land, we wo.._d agree to support landmark designation for the exterior of the Sycamore Inn aad wo%,ld agrees to submit a landmark: application to Yl3 City of Rancho - Cucamonga September 12, 1990 Page 2 the Historir Preservation Commission for conSidacation. Any landmark status would specifically involve the exterior S nIX of the Sycamore Inn. As you ;lave huard from �� 'our staff, and as we wish to maize clear, we could not ever agr€e' "to landmark fiats for the interior of the Sycamore Inn. I understand from discussions with City staff that City staff is coricerhtsd generally with the archeological sig!4- fica,rce of .;pie Bear Gulch arda, includin,', Red Hill. Identification and ' preservation of any artifacts that n,,be discovered in the grading process on Red H.kll -- rather than t#ie issue of the ttofil-1 of Red Hill itself -- is file historic issue. The guantu:N or location of grading is and should remain a planning;, issuo. We are in full agreement with and express our w?:llingnes - --to have an axcheoLogist on site during any grading t'st occurs in cone ssct$,on wltth the Sycamore. Village project. we would like to reaffirm our commitment to preservation of the sycamore grove on ,*the Bear Gult+h site. in the ;canning to date we have been able to preserve apPrPximatsIY 8r,% of the significant trees on situ. The p=ojact proposes to add many more trees than are required by Current City ordinances to establish and pr'saxve the rssrh.Lanct of the site.. However, we believe that the method; of preserving �.re,es, location of now trees and other relr.ted issues ara planning isscvs, not historic preservation 4ssues. I undexstar, that David Dean of Wolff, Lang and Christopher will bs providing some cqnceptual ideas for you to consider at your meeting on September 19, 1990 to illustrate how the historic character of the site may ba portrayed grasphicrlly in the new project. it is any hope that with this written assurPnoo from my son- in -lsw and me, you will feel comfortable in deferring this issue to allow us to GoopIsite the normal planning process without burdening the project with another layer of revisw. No believe that our act, � A over the years have syokon for tM;asealvea and we appreciate yoaas desire to XGCiPtacats. ' Very truly "„ouri, r `r i RICHARD P. MOAN, Donegal `Par. - Arr -yo de LCD ; 0008 ' Septea,'.er 10, 1990 Mr. Matt Jordan, President Azdan Resource Group 2890 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite 10 Ontario, CA 91764 Re: Histo c Mdtigation M. asures Sycamore village Project No 8917000.11 Dear Matt: Upon re- evaluating the rim! plan there are three friable soluti, ns to historic mitigation, AIFU two of which have been pr:vioasly discussed. 1. At the southwest corner rf wilding "D', ground levt.l, in the area of the stair and balcony, i. W diorama could be roidcA- This gsaenWilly would be a display case with a depth of 2' to 3'. fhe diorama could work into the proposed struretant system used thr-ughout the building. site intent of the diomma is to work as a visual display of artifacts, documents, and photographs, as well ,az written material. 2 A'commemorative walk co>rgx*- --d of brass plaques mounted ou stone Ine ys could be placed fluzot.hout the cwArtywd arca iwermingled with the 4_< <es and seating elements. 'Ph , - Aaqu %s could relate to Rancbr,� '7ummonga in the browser sense or could follow a time ;&e theme describing the use of th4 site ircm Captain de Am thratigh the Route 66 era. This would be 6 ;�Aptike in nature and wotdd not rely on act,-.4 ,artifacts or photogrr.hL 3. A third option would be a combination of F.- i and No. 2 strove, placed in the trellis structtire planned for the ares betwe•'., Building 'W vd tht Sycamore trams. This appears to be an ideal soluJon in many v-° it w"M torve to free up the wall surface on Building "1G' f r tenant use, as , Meaning to the trellis by xpanding ?be I activity to this port` '"h+5 is visu nliixed as itsvins the dl f,.ays spanning between sops. ,r .- .s and facing inward towards the trel 'ei% creating a sequential series that wmia - ,& as a is timeline. 11he trellis would be ker. as opera as possibie with vines being encouraged to Vow. ��((f Jy1 VirggiM DOT") TO'Wol t i r0a70 raelhill Sdulove �tneho Cucarr7naa Caluornla O1130 !. ,�� wh��01 Lamp Wotti.. A.IA. DaU faali. ASA. G ICItC CLtutoyhar. AAA_ A.I.A. ! 1 ��I 11A.IA. �III�II�lilIta;� L Dlt7amtllo. . .t dill 1 .A. ttla�tt Y. Stmoaa. A -IA. R Van Septea,'.er 10, 1990 Mr. Matt Jordan, President Azdan Resource Group 2890 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite 10 Ontario, CA 91764 Re: Histo c Mdtigation M. asures Sycamore village Project No 8917000.11 Dear Matt: Upon re- evaluating the rim! plan there are three friable soluti, ns to historic mitigation, AIFU two of which have been pr:vioasly discussed. 1. At the southwest corner rf wilding "D', ground levt.l, in the area of the stair and balcony, i. W diorama could be roidcA- This gsaenWilly would be a display case with a depth of 2' to 3'. fhe diorama could work into the proposed struretant system used thr-ughout the building. site intent of the diomma is to work as a visual display of artifacts, documents, and photographs, as well ,az written material. 2 A'commemorative walk co>rgx*- --d of brass plaques mounted ou stone Ine ys could be placed fluzot.hout the cwArtywd arca iwermingled with the 4_< <es and seating elements. 'Ph , - Aaqu %s could relate to Rancbr,� '7ummonga in the browser sense or could follow a time ;&e theme describing the use of th4 site ircm Captain de Am thratigh the Route 66 era. This would be 6 ;�Aptike in nature and wotdd not rely on act,-.4 ,artifacts or photogrr.hL 3. A third option would be a combination of F.- i and No. 2 strove, placed in the trellis structtire planned for the ares betwe•'., Building 'W vd tht Sycamore trams. This appears to be an ideal soluJon in many v-° it w"M torve to free up the wall surface on Building "1G' f r tenant use, as , Meaning to the trellis by xpanding ?be I activity to this port` '"h+5 is visu nliixed as itsvins the dl f,.ays spanning between sops. ,r .- .s and facing inward towards the trel 'ei% creating a sequential series that wmia - ,& as a is timeline. 11he trellis would be ker. as opera as possibie with vines being encouraged to Vow. ��((f Jy1 VirggiM DOT") TO'Wol t i r0a70 raelhill Sdulove �tneho Cucarr7naa Caluornla O1130 !. e , Mr. Matt Jordan r Iiis',,bric Mitigation Measures r) Syci¢ are Village r.roject No. 8917000.11 September 10, 1990 ,. Page 2 Specifir areas of the trellis might be made Wider to e;lcourage pausing and reflesrior. 'PIaques could be integrawd vnith- the trellis co! amns. A br.of list of historic milestones and landmar tts worthy of consideration are: 1. Uncle Silly's Tavern 2. 'lire 'Tapia Treasury 3. Sycamr,-I Inn during Prohibitica `- 41 3l_+e "Movie Sta:" connection 3. dative Asneri(mns on the site 6. Butterfield Stage Stop 1. A— tempted lynching of 1 ona Merced 8. Route 65 If you need any other infiL'' oration or w5u'tl W-e to di'ctass these opti&us, please give me a ral➢. Very truly yours, DAVTM E. DFAN Project Manager C. ".,0 011.lts .. l ,gyp •T o ,, a �� ,111 pill[ RMT i n e 6xb. � r� r•C•I v1q lgs soso sogap ZAo ue 1^1�'p�g'y�'IaI� Fa MA , t'S4ld/4S 9i�y k I n e 6xb. � r� r•C•I v1q 0 r) o f r 1 g ( r y AIMOy /O939A IwaaN� ilwaay NaOaq IaiDaja A �i Lta � 4 � n � � U I li 1 3ia ,aJ !a_ fit fill aaais I j F AIMOy /O939A IwaaN� ilwaay NaOaq IaiDaja A �i Lta � 4 � n � � U I li 1 3ia ,aJ !a_ fit fill aaais I j lysiauped solo soi ap o,Coaje `I'�Il� PPEF }r • �: /'''�'th�` , "fir ." � l� �1 � do Id , �My 7, .11 �I 1 5�� aJnt ANQ, r r�rt� �;■t[,s�Y��l .1 ,(5 e.ai■ ■i� "'1A ;RSA - .� C 1 YX 1 1ATM � di*zuajed seso sod op a{aue AIM [NEI' r 9 .. trim ggo x` 111 f 1 �i V O�t r �illl u r r• ltXtt Li4 I a � i U16 Q INT"l-Ai J. is ~ t lit, r l ' arai iN �v t { t lit, r l ' arai iN �v r , d4Wwied a4aus 1DV IriA vw 110 "'V D AS .�a c 111 d ' 3 V F = i It 0701 -02 o JUNE 125 1991 P.C. AGENDA 7 of 7 � ,u�,r,,.;ire..l1 eae ►W t t O l C6 g a n N A !09 milliL�1111 ,u�,r,,.;ire..l1 eae ►W t t O l C6 g a n N A !09 z Sl �t7 ditr auiied Soso sot ap aOA lS �elAIK7V� � 2O � Y11 �t 9 OW V AS II( e .seas v r 3 M a L. all's .. � Ivy U1. 1 _ �� d;,� - �.; ,�n 1 '� .Nn � � � �. 1 + 1' =t '. 1� s' j ,/ �`� ",111 U.��. � }r �'� �'t Ufa �� •�+. ♦�. �1 u. ... -.: . . �li�ll �� ,�� 1i� -� F� ��- �� , tY . � '�• _ �`.' � , ~� %( � /`� ( �� £ } > / §: 2� a »z � ƒ� \� � ��/ �Je L, 'I • r. � e IL �: r i X11 U 1AI, c- Alt _ ° ° Itly uo a � I v 3 f((��y 1, nl \ / J i I min 3 f((��y 1, nl \ / J i I ii I staualad solo sq ap oXoue F i r• f A ARROYO DE LOS OSOS May 21,, 1991 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91724 Pttn: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner' Rea Conditional Use Permit f-00 -20/ Sycamore Village Dear Mr. Hayes The purpose of this ) :tter is to respond in writing to the concern raised at the . -i•ign review committee meeting on May 16, 199 relative to expanded parking on Phase I of, our Sycamore Villag Project. At that meeting we stated that we were aware of the Planning Department's concern that there is no additional parking available should uses be requested that require other than a 4:1 narking ratio (except for the Inn which is parked at a 10;1 ratio). While we truly appreciate the Planning DPpartment'S conceVns, it does not appear possible to expand the numbar of availabl.e*parking spaces without major modifications to the 'project. We are not currently in a position to co*nit to a further study of this item until we revisit the marketplace to determine whether this is a material leaeing issue. Because our project may have potential parking constraints, we do ask that the following be considered as aaitigating factors should the need arise: 1) The current parking design sloes rz >t includ4 any compact parking stalls. The inclusion of such stalls will allow us the flexibility to meet increased parking needs. 2) Phases lA and 1B of the project will have excess parkin capacity if designated employee parking spaces (on the east side of the property) can be utilized, 3) If parking constraints become an issue, the problem will most likely surface at the time Building G (Phase 1C) is built, If the design of the project needs to be reconsidered to accommodate additional parking, this appears to be the most appropriate time to address the ,issue. I f CITY f1F rayPr U Cltr +xr try... Planning Commission Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Pear Commission, My objection to this proposal'is the additional traffic it will put on Foothill. The Southern Pacific bridge needs to be removed or widened, There ,needs to be a signal or a stop sign on Foothill and Baer. Go No;.th on Bake: from 7am to 8am or 4pL, to 6pm and �. try to aet on Foothill, you will see why. Finally, not the - most imlortant,,that cut uff from San Bernardino Rd. to Foothil:, needs to be closed. There is a,signal there for those wl;io want to proceed down Foothill. I11 ,i Thank You Sincerely, Don Olsen 8.435 Autumn LeafDr. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 �j RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -20, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 17.04 ACRES FOR A MIXED OFFICE /COMMERCIAL MASTER PLAN, CONSISTING OF 11 OFFICE /RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 190,950 SQUARE FEET WITH PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 6 TWO -STORY OFFICE /RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 113,450 SQUARE FEET ON 3.21 ACRES OF LAND IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF SUBAREA 1 OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFI;>^, PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN BARER AVENUE ANP RED HILL !COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 207 -191- 13,'16, 24, 25, AND 41. j A. Recitals. (i, Arroyo De Los Osos has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 90-20 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in the Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) on the 12th day of June 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on' _'the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolutlon. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comiiisiwiz hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,-Patt,A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantiai evidence presented to this Commission during the ab «a®- referenced public hearing on June 12, 1991, including written and oral stuff reports, together with public testimony, this Commisnion hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Baker Avenue and Red Hill Country Club Drive, with a street frontage of 1,287.74 feet and lot depth of 632.99 feet and is presently improved with the Sycamore Inn, Red Chief Motel and Cafe, 82 mature trees, curb, gutter, on -site parking areas, water storage 'tank, a private residence, and a water reservoir; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO CUP 90 -20 - ARROYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is improved with an existing condominium development and a golf course, the property to the south of the site has commercial development, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is developed with single family residences and retail businesses; and (c) The property is zoned "Specialty Commercial" by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and (d) The project contemplates the demolition of the Red Chief Hotel and Cafe but will require the filing of a Historic Landmark Designation for the Sycamore Inn, the mature trees, the Ono Bear Statue, and potential archaeological resources prior to the issuance of building permits, as per the direction of the City Council on September 29, 1990; and (e) The project contemplates ths� removal of 16 mature California Sycamore Trees during the initial construction phase; all of which have been classified in deteriorating hea7t.r. by the City's arboricultural consultant; and (f) The project development is proposed to be phased with the construction of Buildings "A, B, C, D, and. G" occurring initially. The second phase (Buildings "H" through "R ") will require specific review and approval in the future. 3. Bused upon the substantial evidence presented to this commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set fort`s in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds, and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration, with appropriate mitigation measures incorporated in the Conditions of Approval. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 9 PLA14NING COIJ24ISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUB 90^-20 - ,ARROYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 3 Planning Division 1) Pursuant to provisions of California. Public Resources Code Section 2100(b), this application shall not be operative, vested, or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination _(NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed- And posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the CmLlty of San Bernardino; and:,(2') any and all required filing fees 'assessed pursuant to i California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Department with ,a stamped ,and conformed copy of the Notice of Determination together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined 'exempt from such filir4 lfees pursuant to the provisions of the cA" -, fornia Fish and Mme Code, or the gui.6Z93;21es promulgated there4nd ;e , except for payment of any required h441 ng charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 2) The window and door treatment used on the previously reviewed Building "G° pentagonal entrance alternative shall be utilized on the south entrance of Building "G,." 3) Low stone or concrete capped cheek wai1�s shall be provided to flank the ma*n entry stiirway. Potted plants shall be utiiized at the,',ypper and lower termini of the cheek walls, to, the satisfaction of the City Planner. 4) The wood members used to accent the centre,,:` roof gable shall be more stibstcantial as td \ J appear in proportion with other wood elements of the building, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. PLANNING COMHZSSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-20 - ARROYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 4 5) Wheelchair ramps for handicapped access shall be shown on the revised Building "G" elevations in a location that satisfies all Planning Division and Building and Safety Division requirements. 6) A detail o', the exposed ceiling rafters above the primary:, entrance shall be provided for further review of the Design Review Committee prior to the iesuance of building permits. 7) The stone 'behind the low planters on the south elevat,,oa -of Building "G" may be replaced with wood sluing_. All courtyard buildinys shall ihclud Iaaeea to reflect heritage of craftsman arc JJ; scture, to the satisfaction of the City Plant +,'es. 8) The east elevation of Building "G" shall be revised to be in substantial conformance with the level of detail proposed an the west elevation. This elevation shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance o° building permits. l 9) The gable roof accent detail shall be revised to include return timbers, plaree: and ledgers where the wood fr&�,,e accent returns to j the building wall, to the satisfaction of the ` City Planner. 10) The window trim shall be upgrad6d:to a minimum size of 2 inches X 6 inches for all buildings. 11) All railings within the,,;!?Toject shall be changed to reflect the' °n..w'dsaign reflected on the Building "G" elevations. 12) The post beam cage detail on the courtyard buildings shall be modified to a less contemporary design. This detail shall be revised for further review of the Design Review Committes prior to the issuance of building permits. 13) All courtyard building windows shall be similar j in design (shape, mullion use) to the windows on Building "G." i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90 -20 - ARROYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 5 14) A three- dimensional rendering of countyard elevatiof.s for Buildings "A" and "B" shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review _ Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. 15) A detail of the termination between the wood siding and window asaming indicated the window framing and wood siding "bleeding" into each other, shall be revie%.ad and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of.'- building permits. 16) Prier to recordation of the Parcel Map or the issuance of a1y grading or tree removal permits, the applicant shall develop and 9obmit - for review and approval by the Pl.annina Commission, a: comprehensive long -term plan for the perpetuati..,, management, and maintenance of the Sycamore Grove. This plan shall acknowledge the importance of the grove as a community, environmental and historical Y r resource and provide a detailed and tangible program for the protection and perpetuation of this resource. Following approval of this plan, the owner and the City shall enter into a legal and binding agreement, stipulating to abide by the provisions of this plan, to be recorded concurrently with the Parcel Hap, and to run wih the land. Compliance with the terms of this agreement _ shall constitute a prerequisite for the continued use of the site as approved under the Conditional Use Permit. 17) If any portion or the entire project site is sold, the developer shall inform any potential buyer(s) of the requirement of the Sycamore Grove Perpetuation Plan for the site. 18) Prior to the issuance of any permits, a SOPA- certified archaeologist contracted by the City through funds deposited by the applicant, shall be given as much time as he or she deems necessary 6 become knowledgeable of the site. He or she shall be prevent at all grading, removal of plant materials, existing paving and /or structures, or any other earth Yea PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90 -2C r J�MOYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 6 moving activities. . w archaeologist shall have the authority to stop or temporarily divert construction activities for a period of 72 hours in order to assess the significance 'of the finds in the event that any deposits are uncovered. He or she will be required to immediately alert the City's Planning Division. The Planning Division, in consultation with the archaeologist, shall determine the necessary measures if such deposits are unearthed. 19) The project owners shall notify and make arrangements with any potential buyers, lessees or contractors of this work - stoppage I.ossibility so that potential economic loss is avoided. These approved mitigation measures ahall be affixed to all copies of the project's grading plans. 20) If significant digging reveals any subsurface findings (as determined by the archaeologist), all work shall atop in that area until an appropriate data recovery program can be developed and implemented. The cost of such a program shall be the responsibility of the applicant. All archaeological resc� -roes recovered during the project development shall be donated to a local institution that has the proper facilities for curation, display, and use by qualified scholars. Costs of such curatima shall be covered by the project applicant. 21) Prior to the issuance of any demolition permits, the Red Chief structures shall be documented in f0l per NABS (Historic American Buildings Survey) standards by a city- approved architect. Staff shall approve this documentation in full before permit issuance. Only after the issuance of building permits for the Sycamore village project will demolition permits for the Red Chief structure be issued. 22) The project owners shall submit a Landmark Application for the Sycamore Inn after project approval and prior to the issuance of building permits. any alterations, reconstruction, - or relocation of the Ono Hear Statue will require a Landmark alteration Permit per City Ordinance 2.24.120. y5s U1 11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90 -20 - ARROYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 7 23) Slope planting shall be required to mitigate the potential for erosion and increase soil binding capabilities per the requirements of Development Code Section 17.08.050(1). 24) All construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust errissians and adhere to required noise levels adjacent to residential areas. Construction equipment hours shall be restricted so as not to exceed the maximum allowable noise levels, as established by Section 17.0B4O80(D) of the Development Code. 25) The applicant shall submit ,r: Minor Exception Application C:S the Planningt Division for all buildings exceeding the maxima height limit of 2S feet by lean than 10 percent. The Minor Exception shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to final Design Review approval for all build3.rgW.within Phase 1. 26) The strestacape treatment (i.e., landscape, furniture, and hardscape) shall comply with the requirements and guidelines of the Foothill Boulevardi Specific Plan. The public sidewalk along Foothill Boulevard shall be designed to be p:.,operty line - adjacent with a width of 8 feet, include a terra cotta concrete color and be located a minimum of 5 feat from the face of the ultimate curb. The detailed landscape /irrigation and street improvement plans shall reflect this condition to the satisfaction of the Planning and Engineering Divis2ons prior to the issuance of building permits. 27) All parking spaces fronting Foothill Boulavard shall be screened through the use of berming, low walls, evergreen shrub hedgerows, or a combination thereof, to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 28) All prospective tenants shall be made aware of the L'nferred location of Red Hill fault before signing lease agreements. A standard vrmat letter shall be submitted for review and approval of the City Planner prior to the issuance 6f building permits. y54 1i - - -7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90 -20 - AR.1OYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 8 29) All trash enclosures shall be loeatee 4eas somewhat concealed from view of main streets and shall not hide key architectural elements on adjacent buildings or cause internal circulation conflicts, to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 30) There shall be provision for the following design features in tie trash enclosure to the satisfaction of the City Planners a) Architecturally intfsgrxted into the design of the center. b) separate pedestrian access that does not require opening th4 main doors to include self- closing pedestrian door. C) Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d) Roll -up doors. e) Trash bins with counterweighted lids. f) Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g) chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of enclosure and designsd to be hidden from view. 31) Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 9 a.m. and 10 p.m. only. 32) All operations and 'businesses shall. be conducted to comply with the following standards, which shall be incorporated i.tc the lease agreement of all tenants: a) Noise Levels. All commercial activities shall not create any _wise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dBA during the hours of 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. and SS dBA during the hours of 7 a.m. to to P.M. 33) A vAiform bardscapa and street furniture treatment, including trash receptacles, free- standing potted plants, :iLAe racks, light bollards, benches, etc., shall be utilized for 0 _l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90 -20 - AnOYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 9 the project and ahell be designed to be compatible with the architectural style_ Detailed designL shall be arbmitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 34) Graffiti shall be 7emoved within 77 hours, 35) All future building pads shall be seeded pad irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be - submitted fcr "Planning Division, approval prior to issuance of building permits. 36) All future projects within Phase '2 of tha project shall he designed to be compatiSle and consisterc with the architectural p,pgram established. 37) The rntire site shall be kept free of 'trash and debris at all times, and in no e`ent shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 38) The applicant shall resolvo any Building Code compliance difficulties (with construction of canopies, property lines in relation to <:walle' an:a other openings, and roof tile installation to withstand severe winds) with the Building & safety Divisiom prior to issuance of building permits: 39) Landscape fingers shall be provided within rows of parking stalls at a ratio o€ approximately one per every seven spaces, to the satisfaction of the Planning,S;ivision. Planters ehr °L have a minimum width of 6 feet (outside 40) A minimum of two additional: parking spaces of reduction in equivalent floor area shall be provided within Phase 1. The landscape and grading plans shall be revised to reflect this requirement prior to the imseance of permits. In ineerinc Division 1) The existing overhead utility (telecommunication and elactrical)1 on the project side 'o€ Foothill Boulevarfij shall be undergrounded (all poles along tie project frontage shell be removed) prior to public PLANNING C6MMISSI0I4 RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90 -20 - ARROYO DE LOS OSOS June 12, 1991 Page 10 Agra improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement . agrement to recover ones -.half the City's adopted cost for undergrounding, from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 2) Construct the full north half street improvements on Foothill Boulevard, except for the easterly 3501- feet which may be deferred until development of the adjacent propertj<- or construction is feasible. 3) Provide right -of -way and construct right turn inner for both project driveways. 4) Provide a bus bay west of the main entrance. i 5) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future construction of the median island landscaping within Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The amaurt" of the fee shall be one -half the cost of the landscaping times the Ask length of the project frontage. 6), Reconstruct the San Bernardino Road interzection and upgrade, modify, or relocate traffic signals, as necessary, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7) Acquire necessary easements and construct Master Plan Storm Drain Line 32 -B, including interception facilities on the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive southerly to meet the existing portion south of the Southern Pacific Railroad. The developer may =eceira fee credit and request a reimbursement agreement to recover the ccsot of permanent Mutter Plan fa4lities in accordance with City Policy. S) An access easement in favor of the praperty to the east shall be provided. 9) Obtain an easement and construct the joint, use driveway locat.:d adjacent to the west project bounda'cy. 6. The Secretary to this commission shall certify to the adoption AMh of this Resolution. G . PLANNING COMMISSiON RESOLUTIOI,q NO. CUP 90 -20 - PTtROYO DE LOS OSOti 'q June 12, 190" Page 11 APPROVED PND ADOPTED THIS `12TH DAY OF JU!JE 1991: PLANNING COMMISSION OF`THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOUGA Darry T. MCNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cuce nonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pas$cd, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Ctdamcnga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of June 1991, by the following vQte -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r.. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 7 � III !11117 Win PROJECT #: �n ^rlr �.nj 03, P.,MI i jy I r, SUBJECT: �n✓I.;snAw,/�+ ,cr U ° Gr.c�r�iw� 1 VSO 1�•'Ih'� q%-aJ C J�.,c ar c c 1/, 1:5S.Z� APPLICANT: /ryvo Ge. 4�> l�s�s Lr�P• P == *nc�3�ir9 LOCATION: �<+rTi+ +r 1: 6✓< >�r Il �ivc + 6.'_54 ot- east � �'�.•,( N, +� �,- •.,f,. � c.r..� C,• „� . Those items Checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALE. CONTACT THE PLANNING DiVIS10H , (714) SS9•1661, FOR C®i'aPLIANn WITH THE FOLLO.HING CONDITIONS: A. Tima Limits i 1. approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, it building permits are not issued or approved use has not commencedwithin 24 menthe fromthe date ofapproval. 2. Development/Design Review shall bs approved prior to __L _J_ 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of i 4. Tbedevelopershageommeme. pariMpatal n, andconsumnateoreausetcbeccnxnenced, participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance constfuction "or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. T station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dksirict, and shell become the District's p.•operty upon compkWon. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with Its needs. in any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable t2ws and rsguta ft& The CFD shah be formed by the District sfnd the developer by it* time recordation of the final map occurs. --J_J _ J_J 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the Issuance of building permits, whichever copses first. the appA. -ant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Metio -Roos Community Facilities Qistnict for the conStmuctlon and maintenance of necessarysClool facilities. However, If any school district: has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the app2mrit shag, 11a the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of s1F; h existing D'hMtd prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building par its, whichover comas first. Further. I the affected school district has not forted a Mollo•Roos Community Facilities District wilhintwelve months from . the date of approves of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permiLas for Said project, this oondlion shall be deemed null and void. SC -2/91 1of12 Y!5—/ r1�J- Compietion Dale: This condition shall he waived If the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school Impacts as a result of this projoct. Z 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when rte map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water districtwithin 90 days priorto final mapapproval inthe caseof subdivision orpriorto issuance { of permits in ine case of all other residential projects. B. Slte Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accorJance with Ilia approved plans which —JJ include site plans, architectural elevations, exteflor mater U- s and colors, lasts :aping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Dhfsion, the y4ftlorts contained herein, Development Code regulations, and Fosi&,11 13o�lws __ Specific Phan and _ Planned Community. • 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancyof the facility shall not commence until suchtimas oil Urfiform Building Code and _/oJ State Fire Marshall's regulations have been compiled wtth. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Frio Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to stow compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. A. Revised site plans and building elevations Incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. i/ S. All site, grading,lancM ape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for —J consistency priorto issuance of any permits (such as grading. tree removal, encroachment, building , etc.). or p,7or to final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. .6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all secfbns of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances. and applicatY,e Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at tree time of Building Parmit Wmance. 7. A detailed on -site liq Ing plan shall be reviewad and approved by the City Planner and Sheriff's Department (91398811) prior to the Ismaneg of Wilding pemdis. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent propel la. 8. if no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick -up shall be for Individual units —J--J- with an receptacias shielded from pub4c view. V" 9. Trash receptacles) am required and shall meet City standarsls. The final design, locutions, J—J- and the number of trash receptacles shall be subjM to City Planter review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. V 10. All ground-mounted utility Rppudenances such as trEnsforrners, AC condensers, etc., shall —i—/ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, tterrriing, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. �) sc -ztsi 2 or tz P121= NO.!C 1't "3C °'; CQMVI-�Ort Date• 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. ✓ 12, All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and conci d manner, including proper iliumina.ion. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, phys?c6l T:,,iditlons. fencing, and __J_J weed control, In accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Plannerreview and approval priorto approvaland recordation of the FinalTract Mapand prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade And construct ail trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction w.1h street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Pestridions(CCSRs) shall notprohibitthe keeping of equine animals where zoning requirenrer.is forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual iot owners in subdivisions shall have the optional keeping said animalswithout the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC &Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) o.nd Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the apOrovai of the Planning and Engine, ring Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall bo , ' ,crded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits,. whlcoi ver occurs first. A recorded Copy shall be provided to the City/ Eliginser. 16. AtIlp-arkways, open areas, and landscaping shall bapermangntlyrnaintalned bythepro"rry —/ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and Aak approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shelf be dedicated tar the purpose of assuming that each lot or —�--� dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision whidii shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final reap or issuance of permits, whichever carries first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, Wtures or Vy other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Cede Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated HIMori al Landmark. The site shall t..e developed and _J_.J_ maintain4d in accordance with the Historic landmark Alteration Permit No. . Any further modNici tions to the site Wuding, iut not limited to, exterior alterations andlor interior afteratkfriswhidt affectthe ex'eriorof the buildirgsor structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, rawns(nfdion of buildings or stnsdures, orchanges to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval, C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide fbr#.aasi$C hot water for all dweiliing units J—J- and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other altemawe energy systems are dernonstratedtobeof equivalent capacity and efliciency. All swirriming Pools instatled at the time of Initial development shalt be supplemented with solar heMing. Details shall be included in the Wilding plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building pemnits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural -- treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building rmits. SC - 2/91 3 of 12 Y Cv�'yv ' Cumyletlon Dom' 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners` Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prorto issuance of building permits. ABh V 4. All roof appurtenances, in Nuding air conditioners and other root mounted equipment and/or projections, shalt be shiek ;ed from view and the sound buffered Iror'l adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the buik,ing design and constructed to the satisfection of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) _— 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the devekrpmentto connect fteliingslunitsftiidiraswdh open spaces/ plaz, s/racreational uses. All parking spaces shall be douhle striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances. and exits shall be s!dW per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers it driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrictthe storage of recreational vehicles on this s ie unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in desiprtated visitor parking areas. 1/6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval priorto issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained tanoacaps areas. refer to Sefdlon N.) O_1. A detailed landscape and Irrigation plan, including slope planUng and model home landsca ing in the case of rosirlential development, alts- be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto the Wwanceof building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. _V111 2. Existing treen required to be preserveft piece chall be Protected with a construction barrier ina=rdancewith ft Wtunilclpal Code Section 19.08. 110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and now locations fortransplanfed trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall foi 'row all of the affsk:dsrs recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Aminimtamol ireespergmuacm, comtprisedofthefoliowirtgslzes , shag beprovided within the ,project: - %- 48- Inch box orlarger, %- 38- Inch box orlarger, 9b - 24- inch box or larger, % 15- gallon, and — % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of -.32_% of trees planted within the project uhal be specimen sine trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be plaided at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parklAg stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the.parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC -219t 4of12 J_J J_J __J ✓ s. Aft 1/ 7, qWr �8. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adiacent to and aloe:; structures at a rate of one _- tree per 30 linear feet of building, All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greaters;ope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground covar!oi erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. All pr6ate slopes in excess of5feet , but less than 8feet inv „rticalheghtandof2:lorgreater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one! 5 -gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area l -gallon or larger size?` per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground zover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5 -gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the :fevekhwr prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development, at; slope planing and irigation shall be continu- ously maintained inahealthyand thriving oonch on by the developeruntil each Individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Priorto releasing occupancyforthoseuntts ,aninspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. ✓ •10. For multi- family resklantial and non - residential development, ,roperty owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of -way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive AOL regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. A.rry damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Fron: yard landscaping shall be required per the Development r`.od8 and /or . This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and sk” planting. _V 12. The final design of C a perimeter parkways: walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be Included in the required landscape plans and shall be subjed to City Pi2inner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with anyparkway landscapi!gplanwhichmaybe required by the Engineering Division. 1,/ 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- ing sidew (with hodzwW change). and Intensified landscaping. Is required along 4/ 14. Landscaping and irrigation sysiems required to be installed within the rubk right- of-way on the perhneterof ft project area shall be cm incously mall teed by the developer.. _L,-' 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. lf located In public maintenance areas, the design s.'+ °Y be coordinated With the Engineering DiariWn. ✓ 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and sufxnkted for City Plattner review and approval prior to issuance of building pere*& These criteria shalt enoo rage the natural growth cha+-ac teristics of the selected tree species. Ab 17. Landscaping and Irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles o' Xerscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SC • 2/91 soma qlT 3 J J —/ plgiett \o.: Cannlena, Dote F. Signs t. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not apart of this approval. Any signs proposed for this davelopment shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall i require separate application and approval br the Planning Division pd rto installation of any signs. 2. A Uniforrn Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3, Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes _.J —J— prtar to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building per ` G. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rode --l---J Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer we-n— ^otice of the City Adopted —�--� Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any properly. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway _1_J project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposi; on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Plainer review and approval pdorto the _.J—J issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided. and If appropriate, verity the adeguacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance With the mitigation measures contained In the final report. H. Other Agencies V- 1. Emergency secondary accessshaltbe -A dedinaccordancewltriRanft Cucamonga Fire —J--1— Protection District Standards. 2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintena= frergnd clear. a minimum of26teetwide - -1-- -! at ail times during construction in accordance with Ranclo wamonga Fire Protection District requirements. Ur 3. Prior to Issuance of buiMg pemv>iis for combust W construction, evidence shall be _J___J— submlttedto the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District thattemporarywater supply for fire protection Is available, pending completion of requked lire protection system. 1/ 4. The applicant shalt contact the U. S. Postal Servko to determine time appmprialetype and _._./_J� location of mail boxes. Multifamily realdential developments shall pmv)de i solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate ltg AIng. The fbnat location of the *r Q boxes and the design of the overhead structure shsN be subject to Cky Planner review 60 approval prior to the issuance of buikltng permits. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written oerth'ication of acceptablity, inciud)rmg all supportive information, shall be obtained tram the cart Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building pemtit sc -2191 5of12 74 APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY 0WISION, (714) 969.1563, FOR Atak COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Site Development ✓ 1. The applicant shall eomplyw "h the latest adopted Uniform Building(' ode, Uniform Mechani- cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinames and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative I;arnits. lease contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. Priorto issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) ormajor addition to existing unh(s). the applicant shall pay developmentfees at the established rate. Suchtees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new cor merdai or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant chat pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are rot limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, S&*ol Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4. Street addresses shall be provided bytheBuiiding0flieWl, a`lertractiparceimaprecordation and prior to issuance of building permits. Proiem sy C_ V P `?U1_ J Cgmeledon Dow J_/ JJ J. Exis ting Structures V s 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Buiiding Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings 2. Existing building=s shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for 1 the intended use or the building shall be de�.noilshed. I 3. Existing sewage disposal fadii ies shall bo removed, flW an3Jor capped to comply with thia f Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on -site Wkies are to be located and stiown on bulk" plants submitted for I building permit application. K. Grading I . Grading of the subod property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted graav practices. The final graft plan shall be in substw*9 codormance with tie approvad grading plait. ✓ 2. A soils rr$xM shall be prepared by a qualiited engineer licensed by the State o' California to perform such work. 3. The devek4vnert is sated within the soil emsan control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance Permit is rehired. Please Contact San Bernardino County 0epailmentof Agdculure at (714) 387 -2111 for perntil appHcation. Docurmertatklnot such submitted tothe City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shall be prepared by f, ,7taltied engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of appiicAion for grading plan cl ,•:sic. V 5. The final grading planse shall be corrVeted and apWved priorto Imams of buWlng permits. SC . 2191 701712 I/W J JJ_ J__j_ 1--i—i- _J___J_ i _J_ J_ r I �DIGC(�O.•� ✓F ~� ~�J S. As a custom -lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on- site —y-- -� drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto --» or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On -site d; ainage improvements, fiecessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided J— properties, are to be '.staked prier to issuance of building permits for constmctien upon any parcel tt+at may be subject tc drainage flows entering, leaving, or w-thin a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Zatety Division for for approval priorto issuance of building and Wading pewits. (This may be on an fncremerdaf or composite basis.) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native 0 Sses —y-- -� or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completbnofgradingorsvAneotther alternative method oferosloncontrol shall becompletedto the satisfaction ofLy 80eiing Otti,iai. In addition a permanent irrigation system shag be provided. This reWV;ement does not release the applicarrVdevebper from compliance with the slope ;darting requirements of Section 17.Oi3.0401 of the t?ar3bptren` Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE ENOMEERINGDrASION, (714) Rea-11M FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Areaea 1. Rights -of -way and ea34marts shag ba dedicated to the City fo. all interior public streets, �J community ;rails, public paseos, pubic landscape areas, el'- aet trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans andfor tentative map. Private easements for wn- public facilities (cross -lot drainage, local fcedertrails, etc.) shag be reserved as shown on the plans androrlentative map. 2. Dedication shalt be made of the following rights -cVway on the perittrater streets — J---�- (mcasured from :a" centcri ne): War feet on Fes, i l l3,uj�va,�y total feet onP pF rwi5c oy`joN L,r�' Ens u/ total teat on „_,,,_,,, total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made �—�— for all private streets or drives. 4. Non - vehicular access shag be dedicated to the City for the foff icvin g streets: JJ i/ i S. SC - 2/91 ReciM ;ml access easements shag be provided ensudra access to all parcels by CCBRs -J— or by deeds and shag lb• .s recorded concurrently with thl map orprir rto the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. // J e o[ 12 ioam• 6. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated pteaat JJ� or noted on the final map. 10-7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10 -foot minimum building restricilin area on the JJ- neighboring le adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: •WVe hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building resfi'.tion areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each Mto the adjacent lot through the CCBR's. 8. Ail existing easements tying within future rights -of -way shall baquitclalmedor delineated on J� the final mat). 9. Easements for public sidewalks andtor street trees placed outside the public right -of -way shall be dedicated to the City wheraver they encroach onto private property. 10. Additional street right -of -way shall be dedicated along rightturnlanes .toprov=deaminimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. 0 curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The clsvolopershall make a good f afth effort to aocluire the required off-site Prcpe'tY interests necessary to construct the required public Improvement- .;Ind t he/she should fail to do so. the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to subtnkL� .r the final map for approval, enter :Ito an agreement to complete the Imp,-ovements putauant to Goverment Code Section 66462 atsuchtimeasthe City aoquiresthe property interestsrequiredfortheimprovements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developerot all c *M Incurred by the City to acquire the oit -site property interests required inconnecilonwith the subdivision. S Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form Of a cash deposit in the amount giver: in an appraisal report obtained by the developer. at developers cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencemert of the appraisal. M. Street Improvemem 1. All public improvements (interior streets. drainage facilities. comintinitytralls, paseos, J lamb.== areas. etc.) shown on the plans arxitorte t MWO trap shalt be constructed to City Standards. Interior street kaprovemerAs shah include, but are not Mod curb and gutter, AC paverwill. drive approaches, sidewalks, street rights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicsted r 0"if-way shall be JJ constricted for all hall - section streets. ✓I Cores?met the tQAoWUV perimeter street improvements kieWng, but not Intited to: 11 _S16V r NAME CURB & oLnTzR AC. PVbfr SMZ WALK DRIVE AFM STREET 3119Et col,4ldt. N�DL ILGH73 WMM -� TRAIL S LMM 014{£R ll I { CZ. Dr. ✓ ✓ SC 9I 9 or 12 Y V/ Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during pi3n check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (d) if so marked, an in-Ileu of construction tee shall be provided for this Rem, k/ 4. Improvement plans and coast action: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street tights, prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to, the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public andfor private street Improve- ments, priorto final map aporovalorthe Issuance ofbuiklingpermits , whichever Occurs first. b. Prior to any work being porforrned in public right -of -way, fees shaft be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition t= awry other pe�nits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any neewconstnrcfionorreconstructior of major, secondary orcoliectoe streets which intersect with other major, secondary a collector streets for future trafticb. .qnats. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides C': ,hr street at 3 feet outside of BC R. ECA or 2ny other locations approved Who City Engineer Notes: (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the Cbty Engineer. (2) Conduit shall tie 3 -inch galvanized steel with pullrope. P '.'.t-VP 50iiw CQ171D uyn Diu: _J J __J__i_ - __J_!_ _L _! e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four corners of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads regtriiring tmrwtnxxion shall remain open io traffic at all times with -- 1- ---� -- adequatecaaioursdudnqcrastn )ftn. Aatreetciowrepemtitnsaybs net kvd. Acash deposit shall be provided to cover the Cog. of graft and paving, which shalt be refunded upon completion of the cores wAlon to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Wicontrated dralruge flows shall rnotcross sklewa 3. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed lo City Standards. excW. for single family bats. h. handicap access ramp design shall be as spacitlecl by the City Engineer. ��-- 1. Street names shalt be approved by the City PWwwpiortosubmittal for First plan check. S. Street improvement plans W City Standards for all pivate streets shall be provided for review and approval by thili City Engineer. Prior to any workbeirg pedonmed on the pd- vats streets. fees shall be paid and lion permits shall be obtalrtad from the City Engineer's Otfloe hi addition to any other permits rnquhetl. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-ge!ion size'or harper, shaM be installed per Cky Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. SC -2/91 10 of 12 'Y �G 7. intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with Comdenon Dale: ' adopted policy. a. Can oolle^tor or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project irN9rsections, —%—J hK;luding driveways. Wails, signs, ar;d slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions w',hin the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by moving the 2 + /- closest street tress on each side away fromthe stree . and placed In a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right,-of-way: J_I F,'+h,n all. S. All public improvaments on tha following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the -��- issuance of building permits: N. Public Maintenance Ames 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per (Engineering Public Works Stendards --J--J- shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review h'-hd approval prior to final map approve' or Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The toltcwing landscape parl ways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed Into the Landscape Maintenance District: ✓ 2. A signed conse; asrrdwefverformtoj oirandl orform the appropriate Landscape and l .fighting _I�J Districts shall be filed with the City E'h kmrpdorte final mapz-az.prova lor Issuance ofbuilding permits whichever occurs first. Formall m costs shall be bame by the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems, shell becontirwoush , maintained bythe developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the following streets) shall conform to the results of the —spective _.11 Beautification Master Plan: rr 1 O. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone: therefore, flood —�—� protection measures ahaM be provided as certified by a registered Civti Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shell be the developer's responsibitly to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The developers engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydralogicthydraulic cafculaLans. A Condltlonal Letter of Map Revision (CLCMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map mmrovai or issuance of building permft: whichever occurs tkst. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or impmvement acceptance, whichever occurs first 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final _ map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occ ^rs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City ErhWwr. 2/ t l l of ll 14Y / 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is requrred for work within iisright -of -way. ,d.5. Trees are prohib4ted within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm dra,n pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. _V 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump Witch basin on the public street. P. Utilities Crn,pteuon Date: - V' 1.13rovide separate utility services to each parcel includir:g sanitary sewerage system, water, _ gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all undorgrour.. )In accordance with the Utility Standard.. EasementG shall be provided as req,rlred. ✓ 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation o"i existing utilities as ncIessary. ✓ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of com{ lance from the CCW!) is required prior to final map approval or issuance of pernmhs, I whichever occurs first. Q. General Requirernents and Approvals 1.The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel priov to issuance of building permits. ✓ 2. An easement fora joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of, bui)din g permits, whicheyer occurs first. for a c-cr ss 3.Prior to approval of the f cnal map a dw* "be posted with the City covereg the estimated cost of apportinning the assessments under Assessment District among the raft created. pa,' ~is. 4. EttwandaiSan Savaine Area Regional MaInkm,.Seoorr%.XlrRegional. a..,; Master Plan Drainage Fees shaft be paid prior to final map Wrovai or priorto building permit issuance if no map is involved. S. Permits shall be obit frrom the /fo ng torwork wiUtin their right of -moray: SO -J•J[si�'1 1 "c^lTIL 1'1C,IVZ+ASI p 6.A signed a:;,mertt and wafter form to Joint "or Joan the Law Enfotcsr nOrd 0 :InU* Facilities Dia shah be filed with the City Ergemer prier to final trip approve 4d. the issuance of l t::idirg permits, whichever occurs feet. Fomudion oasts shag be bame by the Developer. _L7. Prior to fin: -aWn of any development phase, sutficlm ettprovsrryAnt iptarts &lentil be eom- plated bey: ..'the phase boundaries to assure secondary access avd a ainage pMection to the satisfy„ -.gin of the City Engineer. Phase boumlarles strait Coact PNIC! to lot fires shown on the approved tentative map. SC - 2/91 12 or 12 V70 J_/— J_J _J_ _ _/ _J —l- i _J_J —. I !_J- J_I_ t ink, r ENTERPRISES 5•: t 1UZ 17 14) 987-8762 JurMTy$pF m13An G110-"AM —MNQA To: Larry McNiel, Chairman Planning Commission JUN AAA � . Front Richard Dahl, Consultant Ref.: IS Properties, sub area 6, 11.09 acres at Baseline and`. I -15 Freeway, Etiwanda Specific Plan Dear Larry: As a result of the Commission action at the speci, , meeting of May 29`h in reference to the Etiwanda Specific Plan we respectfully request that the Coinnisqion concide;r on of the two proposals fca land use of subject proerty, First, our preference would be for the Commission to reconsider the commercia designation at the next: plan cycle. The xaason that the ownE.s of the property elected r.�t to do a traffic study was their belief the cost woul3 be exciossive, however, they now know that the ost is in a comfort range. I am enclosing a letter of agreement to perform the traffic study, Second, In meetings with Brad Buellei an alternative plan was looked at that would be acceptable to the property owners. The alternative was to allow the General Plan designation of "Private Recreational" by use of a CUP, subject to the inter- pretation of code. Will it allow the golf driving range and food service for profit? Our request, should this be the Conmissions choice, that this alternative be included at the next. cycle meeting (or soor,�r if it does not require a General flan Ammezdment). We greatly appreciate your to assure the best use of future. Thank You Si cerely, Richard Dahl, Consultant for IS PROPERTIES willingness to look intn possibilities our property not only now but for the cc; Brad. Buller, City Planner I.S. St ,INC, r.t..tiV$il CITY Or R'cNe -md t0,'. +e + -1NdA jN7i May 03 1991 A! c City of Rancho Cucamon °a n 10500 Civic Center Dri e P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, GA. 91730 Attn: Planninj Department RE: 11 1 rea Southwest Corner of Baseline & I -15 APY W00-051-01,02 and 1100- 061 -01 Gentlemen: j We are willing to undertake a _sffic study to determine the impact a change in zoning from - medium density Resi- dential to Community Cam_ rtial o' property would have on the traffic in "'t.iwande.' Our understanding frcm the Manning Commission: meeting on Wednesday May 29th, 1991 was that the Commission would consider a change to Commercial if the impact on traffic could be mitigated. Cordially, David B. Israelsky Bernie P. Svalstad I.S..Properties, Inc. DBI: jlv BPS 181I IVESTCIIFF DR, NEi"t,ORT BEACEL CA,1266ti5W3 (714) 732 -7662 FAX (714) 722.9924 � +IkNPC.MG CF \7ER bL4E1. OPl4E^. T• rPA![t�tE \Ttk3LSEJ�EIL!.CMNE \;. NAtigGE� [fXfktFASt \G +C't»1.ttEk�4�L t��'Ea:Vi.'�:�