Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/06/26 - Agenda Packet 0701 02 U [E 6, 1991 r p.�. A�ERDA � �� _ �.. p�. c 1 k- � ! �; oNi: � it II (E{ t� i (�3� / l0 7 } _ i kk � 7• �� _ 'f ., 1. i ., `/ fi _ +I�k� ��. _ .- R �� �. -. ,. 7 - Y. 9. �. = � t �., .. .. �,, �-- { ',1 f - �; .. j ,. i! i Z 7 ,, °: - i )( i �t 1. t l\ tt _ .. :,. d � � "- i: _ nresi rrm. +mrcaes� .- ---- — �..... vA)M � u�ot��cnMpic9 :CITY OF t +ik, 'CHQ CLXAMaNGA PLANNING COMMISSION EWDA1977 ; WEDNESD,AY FUME 26, .7:Do�P v � RANLUO DIONOA CIVIC CENTER ";- COUN61L CRAMER 10500 C1VIC,CEKTER DV.IVE ~� ZTsNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIR. ? ` I. Fledge .of Allegiance 1 II. Roll Cad:] _ Commissioner hitiea Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner McNie1 Commissioner Vallette Commissioner Melcher F 111. Ana®uncomants IV. Approval,of.Minute8 Adjourned fleeting of April 4, 1991 May 22, 1991 V Consent Calendar The following. Consent, Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be r� acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A VACATION, OF A PORTION OF AN ALLEY - A .request to vacate a portion of an ;alley south ,cif: Ninth Street from Vinmar to Sierra Madre Avennes - APN 207-243-07' VI. publsc Hearings �. The following items are, public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of ,} the related project Please wait to be recognized by the, Chairman and address �.he Cotimission by sba.ing your name and address. All such opinions shad be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking.:' r.. .. ;t-,- I Q , -. �C 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 94-o1 ;aND 'GSNERAL PLAN 'AMENDMENT 90-03B - `CITY 0 RANCHO `CUCAMONGA - A' public. hearing to comment on the draft environmental impact - report prepared. for the Etiwanda North Specific Plan,' and General Plan Amendment 90-038' to preione approximately, 6,840 acres of berritory in tka Rancho.Cucamonga sphere-of--influence to pro,h6e for 3,613 zA_ gle family dwelling unfits on. 2,473 acres of''i,-avant land, 28 acres cif neighborhood commercial use, 4 schools, 5 parks, as equestrian:,;center, .and presE-:vatioh of 4,112 acres of open space generally'"located ,north of Highland Avenue,< (State =�Route' 30),, south of the San Bernardino National' Forest, west of the City 62 Fontana, and-,east. .of Milliken Avenue.' C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ' SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01 - +CITY OF RA gHO CUCAMONGA - A public hearing ,to comment on the draft 'Etiwanda North Specifil Plan, plea 1onincg approximately 61840 . acres, of territoa din the Rancho Cucamonga sphere-of--influence�.to provide for 3,613 single family dwe.11ing,ur ts.;on 2,473 acres of vacant land;' 28 acres hi ."-ighborhood commercial use, 4 schools, 5 parks, an equestrian cente-!.,, and preservation of; 4';1:I2 acres 4if open space generally located north ,of Highland` Avenue (State ;Route 30), south of the San Bernardino ` National Forest,, west of the city of Fontana„,., and east of Milliken K`renue. D. &NVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AND GENERAL PTAPi AMIENDMENT 90-03B -.C!Tk OF RANCHO" CUCAMONGA A public hearing to comment 'on the proposed General Plan Amendment to ,provide consistency with, the draft .Etivranda. North Specific' Plan, prezoning approximately 6,840 acres of territory in the Rancho Cucamonga sphere-of- influence to provide ,for 3,613 single family dwelling units on..2,473 acres of vacant .land,fJ 28 acres ^-f neighborhood commercial use, rl schools, 5 parks, an . equestrian center, and preservation of 4,112 acres of open space , generally `'located north of Highland Avenue (State Route 30), couth of-the San Bernardino National Forest, west of the"City of Fontana, and-east of Nhliken Avent,e. r \1 II c; E. ENVIRGi'tNTAI:F ASSESSMENT AND 140D FICAT2023.4 TO CONDIZ ONAL USE 'PERMIT 86-06 - RICHARD STENTQ_m `} Modification of conditions of., approval to allow, land uses requiring a mcrC, intensive , _ parking ratio than the one provided far" research' development (1 space per 'S0 �1 square, feet) within an existing industrial T 13.7 acres of land in the General compxex o; „ Indus-trial District (Subarea, 11) of the Industrial Area Specific,.Plan., located on the vprtawest Corner of Buffalp and 6th 5tce +- AINN,,_. 229-261-78 Staff recommends issuance of a Ltgative Declaration. (,Continued from June 12, 1991(.'} F.` ENVIRONPREATAE ASSESSMENT .AND CONDITIONAL _USE-­` PERFfiST 91-0 f-- JAMES PAGE The request:, to establish a "mini-xcall15 (swap mee�)',;in a leased space of 103,552' square feet within an existin4 ndustrial center on 13.17 acres of land in the ` Ceneral Inds trial District", (Subs ea 11) of 'the Industrial Area Speci �c:.Plan, located at 1153n, Sixth Street - APN I'' 29-026-?8. Staff recolaDands issuance of a'j�i�itigated Negative - :reclaration. telated fire Conditional Use ;j' P'ermj,t:,86,"06. (Conti nuecl from June 12, 199i.) G. ENVIRONMENTAV ASSESSMENT,AE7D�DEVELOPMENT.,�REVIE63 `, .81 16 DIU RSIF'IED -,The;development 61 Phase 1 III of a neighborhood commercial shopping center consistinre of two 'retail:. buildings totaling 14;860 .sr�ttara feat`on 12.96 acres of land within an approved shopping center in the Ne$ghborho e' Ce-mercial .District, located at the northeast 5cdrner , of Haveif',sand Highland Av€`aues 26 -271-65. and",'71. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from'June,12, 1991.) II H. ERVIRQN.4ENTAL ASSESSMENT "AND CO2.DZTIt)NAL USE PERMIT 91-17 - WILLOWS COTRIUNITY. C'_IURCH PASTOR FORREST HINDZ,EY The request to establish a church and school in :a leased space of, 9,429 s-ivare feet within an existing oEfiGe part on 1t..)9 acres of.land in the Office: Professional zone, located at , 10601 Church Street - APN: ` y 077-421-31. Staff 'recom '�; ds issuance of a Negative Declaration. o c., (i it O I.' ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT STD TENTATIVE TRA_T 14795 - HJANDAH INTERNATIONATj',; A residential subdivision and design review , for 13 Condominium units on 1.23 acres of land in the Medium .Residential District (8-14 dwe3ling, units per acre), located on the north side, of Arrow Rpute, east of the extension of.,Madrone Avenue APN: �,07-201-10, 11, and 24: Staff recommends issuance;of a-Negative Declaration. i( J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSEssr zaz AND FOOTHILL, BOL?L� SPECIFIC RLAN'`-ANENDKENT 90-4 - .M H&T-TSON COMPANY A request to •,uodifjt;:the median-break location on Foothill Boulevard,: to add a median break location'"on'Foothill Boulevard .,and to . change. ;the' land use , designation from Eight Industrial to Regional Related Commercial for an area of approximately 26 acres within th7} Foothill i'oulevare� Specific Phan (Subarea 4); located O.n the east side, of'',-`,Interstabe 15, south of 'Foothill Boulevard. These requests are in conjunction I w!M. the development-:ci a' ±5D acre retailJt o n aer%4' al' center. located on the south side. of i i:k hill ;,Boulevard between . I-15 and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 229-031-03 AMk through 33, 15, 16,' and 20. staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related Files: Conditional .Use Permit 90-37 and. Tentative Parcel Map 13724. `! K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE E!ERMIT"90-37 THE WATTSON COMPANY A request for master plan approval of 'a tGO acre 61 retaillcommercial center containing approximately' 550,000 square feet of leasable space and a request. for approval of conceptual site plan and building elevations for the Price Club facility "in the Regional Related Commercial and Light industrial: designations of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (subarea '. 4), located on I the south side of Foothill Boulevardubetween Interstate 15 and Etiianda Avenue APN: 229-031-03 through- .,3, 15, 16, 'and 20.. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated , Negative Declaration. Related Files: ,Foothill Boulevard Specific 'Plan . Amendment 90-04 and Tentative,parcel. Map 137247: ` AWL r; C . P L. NV RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIYE PARCEL MAP 13724 THE WATTSON COMPANY - 'A subdivision of 56.91 acres o- land into 15 'parcels'in the Regional, Related 6ommerciah and Light Industrial d4sig v tions of the Foothiil Boulevard`Specifin''Plan (Subarea 4) , located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard `betwef;n Interstate „15 and Etiwarida Avenue . API II 229-031-03 CEhrough 13 15, ,16, and 20. Stz"ff recommends issuance of a Negative �7 Declaration. Related Files: Foothill " Boulsvard Specific Plan `Amendment '90-04, and ` Conditional. Use Permit 90-37. M. CONDIT1213AL USE PERMIT 91-15 - SOUTIMST DESIGN GROUP A request ' to establish a wholesale retail silk flower,arrangehent Custom manufacturing use within the, existing` 'Arrow Business Park on '9.6 acres of land: in :the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific an, located at 9087 Arrow Route, #120 - APH, 209-013-1.9. ITEM WZTHDRAWNI. N. E2NTitON1+IENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TACT 14110 - ETYWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY; = A ' re idential subdivision of 68 singl4 'family u lots on 53.05 acres of, land in the Very Low, 4�zesidential District (1-2 dwel-ling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on r the nox~th� and south sides of, -Summit Avenue, a�prox&atlly 1;300 feet, west, of Etiwanda Ave,Ug -J'APN: 225-111-22 and 225-171-021 08, 11, and 16. Staff ,,recommends issuance of a � mitigated :Negative Declaration. Associated with this project is Tree Removal Permit 91-21 O. CONDITIONAL IUSE PERMIT 91-22 VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK -,.,The request to establish an administrative and office use in a leased space of 8,100 square feet within an existing industrial park in the General I Industrial 'District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial 5pecifac Plank ilocated , at 9495 9th Street AM: 209-032-24. P. ENYIRONME',NTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODZ-,, AMEND+KENT 91 03 i�- CITY OF RANCHO 'CU6AMONGA ---A request to add Section 17.08.040-P and Section 11.08.070-5 to the Developer intr Code establishing property maintenance standards and , ongoing maintenance requirements for multiple family dwellings,. (TO BE CONTINUED TO JULX 10, 1Q91.! t 9II. Old pusineas QIII. New Business I%. Director's Reports Q. CONSIDERATION OF ADDING PET SHOPS AAS A PERMITTED OR CONDITIONALLY PEI�tiI'�E�USE I, THE COMMERCIAWOFFICE DIST91CT OF _THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN X. commission Business BI. l?ubliC Comments 'his is the time and place for the general public ,to address the 4ommission. Items to be discussed s here are those which do not already, appear on this agenda. 5 BII. Adjournment The Planning .Collmission has adopted Administrative Reculati;ons�4hat set :yzh 11;RO' P.M. adjournment time: ISF 'items go beyond that time,'they shall be heard only with.the, consent of the`Commission. .1 �1 - rl G vicinity ala,p //t.R17P Ne r�rglN�/r '4 �° r rr• / a n 4 M/ �i a^ ...... ...., tt p :�m w'®ddi Y(r.® iq.'ae®rrs >os®m�®. : �1/�� :•t Fe aim lI G - iWr>aer � � a rL'i►'adA�i�i j1,� qr i1P� �iV i Yclaris ✓�// E 1 � os WYMLL ®` 0=40maem �, .. n„ a :: bllr city rancho ouca onga • T_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT CE: June 265 1991 Chairman and Rmnbers of the Planning Commission FROM: Mike Olivier Senior Civil Engineer BY: Curt Billings, Engineering; Technician SUBJECT: VACATION OF'_A PORTION OF AN ALLEY —A ;request, „vacate a .portion ot an alley south of Ninthriet from Virmar',sto Sierra Madre Avenues (APN 207-243-07) I. BACKGROUND: J Mr, and Mrs. Richard J. Deno, property, owners at 8730 Yinmar a;anue (Lot ` 40, Tract 1829) have. requested the a11ey north of their property to be vacated. j, The City has estaNiished i-task force as authorized by y Council, to eliminate gang activities in the neighborhood. By the r6-Dents request, the task force has recommended clos ig the alley from pedestrian traffic to prevent loitering and graffiti. When vacated, some resident.'' intend to relocate their fences to the center of'ihe- fliey while others will utilize. the alley for access to the rear portions of their property. 'as shown on Exhibit "Cu. II. ANALYSIS: The alley is 20 feet wide, 316 feet long and presently unpaved.. There are two utility poles within the alley,,,providing electric; and telephone service.` An,agreement for reciprocal access, drainage, ingress and egress, and maintenance will be necessary. , III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning` Commissioi make the finding that the alley vacation conforms With the General, Plan, This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval. Respectfully submitted, Mike Olivier Senior Civil Engineer MO:CB:ly Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "C" - Location Map , ,! THAT PORTION OF AN A LEY AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP 1 tt 2e6F THE TOWN C1 F WEST �) CUCAMONGA AS PER PLAT RECORDED"'IN BOOK 28,PAGE 20,RECORDS OF SIN BERNARDINO COUNTY,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: AI I FY } ALL THAT PORTION OF AN ALLEY20.00 FEET WIDE BOUNDED AS FOLLOWS: ON THE NORTH SYTI IE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS'10 THRU 15 INCLUSIVE,MAP OF THE TOWN OF WEST CUCAMONGA AS PER PLAT RECORDED Pq BOOK 28,PAGE 20,RECORDS OF SAN'BERNARDINO COUNTY; ON THE SOUTH BY THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 40 AND 47,MAP OF THE TOWN OF WESTrUCAMONGA AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 28,PAGE 20,RECORDS OF SAN BERNAADINO COUNTY. ON THE WEST BY THE EASTERLY LINE OF VINMAR AVENUE; ON THE EAST BYTHE WESTERLY LINE OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE. Aft -f :r CITY OF ITEM: V-117 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: RIPlI®N G ENCINEiERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: I I k nL :o. uewsnlH o Z ,rn Oz AV s n Q .IS oliono� s chll vo u luh ul Q _ hv0m1`s o . 99 .. a Ir,Vlo,,,�p N N }`, � i sHe E Ava. > _0 1=.. .T 2 p® SWISH a m , . , a t7 t ?C H'O Ew y a Ca Ya ��'0 W � �' tf i N• Iwpj - � 3nN3A`d 38CIVW VEJU31S M/ti Srulw.to 6n nY e tr 5 m ui a r v a 3 3AY Y Y CIUVA?NIA Cn) ZO uj � a Imo. 301M,t1Z UOA CD 1� • A , M!d v / e� 3f1N3AV, iVWNIA ,U11% Oz IunO'J , axis F A ca 34 Loki Ul z I A-3 1� e 1 } ol Z 3nN3nd 3UOVW VHH31S z >- 1p LU =,i o a E)V O M3N` Lb Co02 UAMTdpZ !11l1ki is r :2—IEg O }=IL Lid p .03 e d d EZI c7 a: ch _ Ake W Ic 4 o Ad r AU w 3 uys _ V •W U. g 4. of a ' LU a w O 0y 7-1 t L z 1wa 0 Mfa o=w z du z 3J1NLO HVWNIA . I CITY,/f RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT *7- DATE: June 1�5, 1991 TO: - Chairman and Members of the: Pla_ming Commission FROM: Bra-Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Sratt, Associate Elarner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-03B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A public hearing to comment. On the draft environmental - impact report prepared for the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and. General Plan Amendment 90-03B to prezone approximately 6,840 acres of territory in the' Rancho Cucamonga sphere-of-influence to provide for 3,613 single family dwelling units on 2,473' acres of vacant land, 28 acrea of neighborhood commercial use, '4 schools,' {% -5 parks, an equestrian center, and preservation of 4,112 acres of open: space generally located north of Highland Avenue (State Route 30)r south of the San Bernardino National 'Forest, west of the City of,Fontana, and east of Mlliken ;Avenue. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SPECIFIC PLAN 90-(WA - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A public hearing to comment on the draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan, prezoning approximately 6,840 acres of territory in the Rancho Cucamonga sphere-of-influence to provide for 3,613 single family dwelling units on 2,473 acres of vacant land, 28 acres of neighborhood Commercial use, 4 schools, 5 parks, an equestrian center, and preservation of 4,112 acres of open space generally located north of _ I/ Highland Avenue (State Route 30), south of the San l Bernardino National Forest, west of the City of Fontana, and east of Milliken Avenue. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-03B CITY OF RANCHO CUCM40NGA A public hearing to comment ., on the proposed, General- Plan Amendment to provide consistency, with the draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan, prezoa ng-approximately 6,840 acres of territory' in the Rancho Cucamonga sphere-of-influence to provide for 3,613 single family dwelling units on 2,473 acres of c'^r, vacant land* 28 acres of neighborhood commercial use, 4 schools, 5 parks, an equestrian center, and preservation 145 of 4,112 acres .of open space generally located north of ITEM,B,C,D PLANNING COMMISSION STA_F REPORT SP 90-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAu-, June 26, 1991 <J y n Page 2 Highland Avenue (State Route 30), south of the San Bernardino :National Forest, west of the City of Fontana, and east of'Milliken Avenue. 1. ABSTRACT: The purpose' of this hearing is to receive comment on the Etiwanda North Specific Plan draft Environmental Impact Report, consider t*4 Etivanda North Specific Plan, and to consider` those changes in the City's General Plan which will be required for consistency with.the specific Plan. Upon receipt.of public testimony and Planning Commiesion discussion, staff recomment-a that this hearing,be continued to July -24, 1991, in order to complete revisions. II. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: ` A. _Draft Environmental Impact Report: The draft Environmental Impact Report has been completed and circulated for comment. A copy of the: dra£t EIR was distributed to the Planning Commission on May 3, 1991. The official comment,periocl was from May 6, 1991 to .Tune 20, 1991. Oral and written testimony received at this hearing will be Included in the final EIR. A s:mmary of impacts and mitigation measures is discussed in Table 1-1, Executive Summary (see attached). Several items cannot be mitigated to a level of less than significant' Under the California Environmental Quality Act, a reasonable effort must be made to reduce environmental impacts. The draft EIR recommends two approaches. For aggregate resource_, areas and parks, a change in.the Specific Plan is proposed. These changes. are supported by staff. For the remainder of the impacts, a reasonable effort has been made, but the Impacts are still significant. Therefore, a statement of overriding consideration must be prepared and, approved prior to approval of the Specific P.;nn (see attached Exhibit "A" Discussion: Draft EIR Mitigation. Measures). B. Dkoft Etiwanda -North Specific Plant The Etiwanda North Specific Plan was distributed to the, Planning Commission on y: December 21, 1990. As a consequence of review by the Planning Commission, the Trails 'Committee, the Parks and Recreation Commission, a community workshop, EIR mitigation measures, and t public comment, some revisions to the draft plan are proposed. (See Exhibit "BI, Discussich, Draft Etitanda North Specific Plan.) s 1{` PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Sig 90-01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 26, 1991 Page 3 _ y C ^�'•' Accordingly, revisions are ptaposed to toe Land Use and to the ' Park.and Trails maps, 'Changes have alrJ L:een made to several-' of the remaining maps to achieve;clarity of presentation, to make technical corrections, or to.provide consistency with the Land Use Map. (See Exhibits "C-1" through "C-12",'Draft Etiwanda North Specifici Plan. Maps.) _I C. Consistency with the General Plant The draft North Speci-,ie Plan is consistent with the overall goals and intent of the General Plan. : However, several changes are recommended L� achieve actual consistency and specificity_ between the Specific Plan and the General Plan. (See Exhibit "D", Discussion: Consistency with the.-General Plan.) l Changes are recommended to the Land Use Plan, Circulation Plan, Parks and Recrea,:ion Plan, Matter Plan of Trails, Community Design Resources,-Natural Resources, and Open. Space Elan. (See Exhibits "E-1" through "E-d", Existing General Plan Maps.), III. SurAH&RU: The Environmentnl Impact Report identifies a number of impacts and offers mitigations. Royever, because 2,500 acres will be changed from an undisturbed natural area to developed area, a number of impacts cannot `ae mitigated to a level-+£„less than- significant. The Specific Plan is recommending a number of -land use designations which are different from exf sting, Seneral plan land use designations. The Specific Plan 'builds :on the City's standards for development and 'provides detailed guidelines for development. A number of changes to the General Plan will be necessary to provide consistency with the Specific: Plan. These changes are consistent with the intent of the General Plan land use.policias and with surrounding land uses. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Commentu are invited on the i Environmental'Impact Report, ;,he Etiwanda North Specific Plan,,Ad on changes to the General Plan necessary to provide consistency with the Specific Plan. Following public testimony and discussion by the Planning Commission, the Commission should direct' staff' to '.complete'' .evisions to the Draft Specific Plan, prepaie xesr,;nses to corments or. the draft 'EIR, and to prepare a .statement of overriding considerations for the final EIR. A:cordingly, the public hearing for this item should be continied to July 24,; 1991, i3c0-3 I PI,ANNINZ, COMMISSION.STAFF REPORT -SP 90-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CU AMON,GA Tune i6, 1991 Page 4 m to receive the draft Specific Plan. revisions, the FEIR, the Environmental `Determiration,'and for consideration of Resolutions ' { recommending Iadctirn of the Specific Plan and consistency t amendments to the.'General Plan. Respe ly sub 4ted, ,f Brad ller t City Planner BB•ram 5 mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Discussion: Draft EIR'Mitgation` o measures Exhibit "S" - Discussion: Draft Btiwanda North'Specific Plan Map Revisions �> Exhibit "C" - Draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan Maps Exhibit "D" - Discussion: Consistency with the:General Tian Exhibit "E" Existing General Executive Summary Draft Enviraruo Impact Retort Summary y , Fv 1 1, E e D- E L ) 6/i EXHIBIT "T>" DISCUSSION: DRAFT EIR MITIGATION MEASURES i ' I DRAFT EIR MImIGATION MEASURF,S: Although; ?ation is proposed to hhe maximum extent feasible, several impacts.' . not been mitigated to a level of less than significant, in. f n: ese instances Staff support. issuance of s statement of overrid'z;ig considerations. These items include the following: l Loss of Open Space: Development will result in ;.,oss of approximately 2,500 acres of natural open space A Resource Management Plan will be prepared to provide L to protect sensitive resources. However, impacts will not b.. reduced to a level less than s';1'r +cant. Circulation: At, tsrrt, and with developer contribution for intersection i mr^' !ts, the following intersections are still projected to opi an, f"lessL than level C C * Cherry at Wardman 'Bullock Milliken at, Base'Line * Rochester at Base Line * Day Rreek at 3ase Line * Etiwandi at Base Line East at.Base Fine * Milliken at;Foothill " Rochester at Foothill * Day Creek at Foothill Etiwanda at'Foothill Therefore, impacts not reduced to a level of less than significant. Aggregate Resources: .Significant impacts will occur`as a result of development on lounty -Flood Control property weet of the Day Creek Wash levee. Since the County is not proposing i ,levelsP mens n the County s Specific Plan, staff proposes to revise the plan to omit residential development on identified .aggregate resource seas. This is .consistent L with the General Plan policy on Aggregate Resource areas. A floating park/school site designation will remain, and will require a separate assessment if actually looated on aggregate_resource land. Therefore, the impact will be reduceP to less than significant. (See Exhibit "B",_Discussion: Agcregate Rescurce Area.) Parks: Staff originally " identified the neighborhood park requirement as -3 acres per thousand-population per. the Quimby- requirement standard in effect. This is 'ndt consisten:: with the General Plan goal of 'S acres per thousand. However, a revised =, HIBIT "A" - Page I ii , L assessment of the JQuimby basis indicates the, City; can now require 4.GB9. acres per _thousand. Therefore, staff proposes that the project, be amended to provide at least 4.689 acres per thousand. The sites should be unencumbered ,neighborhood parks on minimum sites of 5 acres of developable land. Additionally, trail, head or other smaller sites for related park use will be required and may be applied to the 5 acres,per thousand General Plan goal. This action will reduce the impact to a level of less than significant. Land forms: Development will result in loss of approximately 2,500 acres of natural land forms, mainly prominent .alluvial Fans. To reduce impacts, measures that will be taken include: Development wit?occur on gentler sloping tepxain; * The Iiillside bevelopmen't Ordinance shalt/be usedi and The prominent kjoll'adjacent to th= hay; esha}1 be reserved for a passive park, >` These actions will reduce project,Imvacts, but not to a level less than significant. Regional wildlife and Habitat' imuacts: Develtii3ment will result in loss of approximately 2,500 -acres of .wildlife habitat area. Measures will be taken to preserve significant areas as natural open spare, including: Lands above the National Forest boundaryl * Steep alopes; S, ' Riparian corridors:' * Wardmari, Morse, and, Henderson Creek riparian corridors upstream of the alluvial fan; San Sevaine wash;' * Etiwanda Washy * An adequate wildlife corridor connecting Etiwanda Wash and San Sevaine Washy * Seismic setback Areas,- Day Creek spreading grounds; " o Investigating the feasibility of restoring flood flows to Da Creek spreading grounds;y p c,,T, 4r ds, _ Preserving natural. vegetation within flood control and utility easements to the maximum extent feasible; * Establishing buffer zones between development and natural areas which vary from, 10 to 5o feet in width; * Revegetat-ion with native plants in buffer zones, V consistent with the Etiwanda North Resource Management ! Plan and Etiwanda North Fire Protection'Study;- * Prohibiting off-road vehicle travel within open space areasi and ' Establishing. a pw-nitia system for pedestrian use of open areas bordering the National Forest (addition per Planning Commission workshop). EXHIBIT "A" y P !3 2 Pa RO ge r Comments from wildlife agencies indicate that in addition to the alluvial fan scrub habitat within existing spreading grounds, recommended for preservation in the Specific Plan, the al-iuvial fan scrub habitat north of the' double utility corridor should also` be �! considered for preservation. (See Exhibit Discussion: "-' Regional Wildlife and Habitat Impacts.) Aesthetic: Development` will result in loss .of' approximately 2,500 acres of natural area- with attendant. aesthetic ' foss. ;Community Design, Development Standards, and the Design Gu,delnes of the Specific'Plan. shall be implemented-, View potential areas shall be protected However, im_oacts wi ll" not be reduced to a level of less than significant. Air Quality Construction will cause a temporary significant increase in particulate.a+atter.,; Duet suppression techniques shall be implemented.., However; impacts will!'not be reduced to.a level of less than significant. E I i. i< r. r r EXHIBIT "A" — Page 3 7 _ r"� ; c.� EXHIBIT "B" AWA DISCUSSION: DRAFT ETIWANDA NORT�11 SPECIFIC PLAN MAP RE('ISIONS The following discussion presents ,an overview of the Land Use proposals of the'Etiwanda North Specific Plan. An overview of the maps included in the Specific Plan are also included. ISSUES: The following items set policy for the Specific Plan: Aggregate Resource, Area: In response to the impacts is :the aggregate resource area, the residential designation for the area outside the i)ay Creek Wash Leve, will remain Flood Control. However, the J�otential'of the: area for residential use is noted, and staff rgcommends support for appropriate 'residential use following a County land Use Amendment. Regional Wildlife and.Habitat Impacts: In response to>potential impacts to the bog area, staff, proposes that the limit of ';evelopment on the alluvial fan north of the bog be moved to the south side of the upper branch of the Cucamonga Fault. Thi.a land use designation will protect the bog from urban runoff, protect the f, existing water sources of the bog, and permit wildlife access. In light of communication from the U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife and the California Department of Fish and Game, this is a conservative approach. The wildlife agencies indicat that the limit of deve opment should be the upper power.corridor and the alluvial fan north of the power corridor 'between Day Cre'— and Etiwanda Creek should be' designated as a wildlife habitat and " alluvial fan scrub mitigation area.. The Platnning Commission may wish to investigate the,;) feasibility of designating- all the aforemerwioned alluvial aria north of the upper power 'corridor as a mitigation area. Hillside Residential Estaka: The Specific Plan also proposes that the developable hillti des mast of Etiwanda Creek carry a :more restrictive land use f' designation. The proposed` hillside residential estate designation would require 1 unit per'davelopable acre with a minimum 1,acre lot size. -This designation contrasts with the existing.hillhide residential designation which allows 2 dwelling units per- 4evelopable acre and does not. specify a minimum tot size. The4proposed designation is responsive to "the terrain and closer to-the designation of the County-General Plan than the existing general hillside residential designation. Neighborhood Commercial: The Specific" Plan proposes two general lift Neighborhood Commercial areas. A. site 'specific market study would required to support any commercial development in the Specific ; Plan area: EXHIBIT "B" Page '1 AMk Park Sites: Five neighborho6,;.,park sites are proposed. There are, 5-proposed park sites, one f&i each identified neighborhood• The recommended size of the parks will be adjusted to;reflect the'5_per ,. thousand population goal of the General Plan for unencumbered, developable par'cs. It should be noted that Community Services has reviewed its parks requirements under the State Puimby 'Act Legislation, and is currently entitled to resource'4.689 acres per thousand. Supporting calculation ie as follows: According to the 1990 Federal Census, the current population figure',, for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is-101,409. Taking these numbers , into consideration, the calculated park acreage standard"is: J, j , 233.75 acres developed" F; 19.0 under construction 222.8 undeveloped 475.55 acres parkland 475.55 acres .004" x 1000 = 4.689.acres 101,409 population 1000 population Trail heads will also provide park acreage. The 5 -acre per thousand goal of the General Plan will be met on-site. `-Trails and landscape utility easements shall not count toward the neighborhood park goal within the Specific,Plan. ' Equestrian Site: A minimum>25 acre equestrian site is proposed to provide for equestrian boarding facilities within the City's Equestrian Overlay District." The equestrian facility is proposed to meet the intent of the General Plan policy to provide lots large enough for keeping horses north of Highland Avenue. A 36 acre site on Southern California: Edison surplus property has been identified as the preferred site for an equestrian facility with a trail head to be located immediately to the west on the other side of Day Creek, :oulevard. A second trail_,.hged`.shall be located in the •Iici„__ `of the Upper Power Co_ridor-at IA Regional Front Line Fire Road)Trail. School Sites: The Etiwenfl -School District indicates that three elementary, schools are :ieeded within the Specific Plan area. In addition, Chaffey, High School District,.-equests that a high school site be,provided in the vicinity of Banyon and Milliken Avenues. Each school site must be a stand-alone facility, with adequate open space on-site to serve the student 'population.- Schools< shall' be located adjacent to parks to facilitate joint use of facilities, and also to provide a neighborhood focal area. MAPS: The plans and maps prepared"for the Specific Plan are briefly discussed below. Review of these items provides an.overview' of the Specific Plante ERHIBI7 ^B^ Page 2 �a> t, land Use Plan (secs Ex9ibit "C-111a Single family residential land J'J use r;, .'su g� g commercial. Parks. a, = }11 pportin uses of nei hborhood Achoo proposed. Substantial areas remain under open space it design�ti6ns. Circulation Plan (see Exhibit "C-2": See Discussion, Exhibit "D.1' i men Space and Traila Plan (see Exhibit "C-311: Significant areas of open.;space are expected_ to remain undeveloped. A Resource,' Management Pian shall be prepared to reduce the impacts of planning urbanization of adjoining areas. Planning Area Key Map (see ,Exhibit "C-411): The St�'cific Plan provides for five neighborhoods focused by a neigh boncc1, d park and an adjoining school site, except in 'the Oaks neighb4{rhood which does not have a proposed school site.' Constraints Map (see Exhibit"C-5"); •' Maps significant resources and hazards affecting development. IJ Existing Conditions Map (see Exhibit "C-5"); Mapp#gnifican`t existing conditions such as utility corridors, existin.,,,,.aesidences, and other built features within the area. �. Thew Potential 'Map (se6 Exhibit "C-711: -Maaps significant view pctential areas identified within the Specific Plan area. Water Master Plan (see exhibit "C-8"): This map is updated to reflect the Cucamonga Cottity Water District Master Plan., Sewer Master Plan (se6/j xhibit "C-9"}: This map is updated to ' reflect the Cucamong& CF)unty Water District Master Plan. f , Storm Drain Master Plan (see Exhibit "C-10"): This map is ct,arlistent with the,;City's Master Plan of Storm Drains. City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Land Use (see Exhibit "C- 11"): This map is informational. San Bernardino County General Plan Land Use (see Exhibit '"C 12"'): This map is informational. . ;i EXHIBIT "B" - Page 3 �' • San nemardi o National Fo.eat { QS FC IDS FC ®S _ oS RC _ FC Qu'h ffi OS - - t yyM MR l: tkbrl3 �.F 1 h1 is ._'1•�i.µ � `�� �e1�_ �3 \\l , FC QS w,. Fa FeE F8' B FC Re WIL °YL FC FC. PrtROPosEo uC- . UL uC Ft REGIONAL RAMMUL (VL) RC 0 lie oc e3s VL — ` . �_ FC 3' <' FC FC �. ;.. --�• sr., r � a i, w nd.Arenw a ere /"' tz.E�� � I LEGEND Fy...a,no, etfk'13a E. 'a>Lore UanaltY RasldentW(2 sDU/AC) �P11 yetY Low Density Reakontial(c2 IX)/A,O Pwpoaed'll'aq mad QsGkV Station Tda,a�Very l.on Raafdential Estate(t DU/AC) Proposed Equastrks Facility K Ue Rssldat tW(c2 DU/Nat Buildable Acre) ' r n Mislee Raildmitial Estate(tt DQ~Buildable Aero) Posed SeMel lute*. ' +l 11 .. - r 1•�}( FC.. Flood Contra! Proposed F%*We UC IttYliv Cerrtd@r P Fstotlnp Part she Sas _a _ OS open Spam * tam �N kmtitutianal ry ah.o saws��'(.er e.anoaer meae 1 r FZ Fault Zone wwL =ub aWeew:�M `e ew.,nee m ., i.: 'q•' Mew"slues-.a` at emr u ageaaa •i• .- x AC Rosowe@ conservation ..e,aen u do snr al;aw acnee,aacncr � piro)NeiOatcrP�ood CommerGal* � �\� ;r (L.VL,VLE) sato.wr t,mre wa vu oa�e.ns.a \�, LAND USE PLAN Ettwanc4a Nort3y 'Specific Plan, city of a Rancho Cucamonga *eb /J EXHIBIT C 1 Al i San aamat no Naftnar forest r--� A _ ,M Wilson venue A3 Al Al w�wnAveieA19 s, t r— tl ® LEGEND l wM%F-d-Pt-- mw�:Major Divided Arterial All Typical Section ,,..,.,,....®. -Car Creek BMW48M 31 mummsm Spacial DividedSecond3ryArtelia] AWsan Awnee(rsst or My creek odd) �� i I �• Secondary Arterial . -Vft nAvanaa -EtWan"Avems -AWWM Arenas 4)Mw DV Creek 9ouNvard C"Avwm = ®®® Collector r aaMan StrWt 4W"tet Avm m ' '• Arwtage Orin '4YmQ,7M DACCk And -Gan Swans -Othw loco SOWk Etiwansla P rth Specific `� . City of JRatictto Curanorrntta -/2 EXHIBIT C 2 11, r��%���y�J��^•f' r/+'i !/i/... �r'1..fIIi"!iI?'�i��ii�ili/iii//! r+ I/�/I liv//nyiiT /-� I///��� DEMO city of 0 Barnet nu NaUnnaifonaC 10.J - OAKS T 111iDA HIGHLANDS T _ 10.2 $.1 �.2- PER STI 8 i z.2 2.3 A wnifUn-. Avamra ��.•!� E 10.1 �• r T179M1nR Araaut O$.R: .,.... LEGEND c89VK;Maewe 1.0 Subarea R.-mranae I .7 C, PLAMNIN AREA KEY MAP n 0 10VOr 2 s000' •� Biwanda North Specific Plan City tit Rsrntho[urAeai>�a �,� '/�f EXHIBIT C 4 l , San Bernardino National Forest � I Bo dofp Hyrnlopy5tudp Ana rR ■ -�J(.:1• IFS.. :�J�••��:�: e � LEGEND .�a.r+o.ln scc rK r,LA z •^®Watr whys v.v Ceapir�*WSln11 Q tat Malor HectmiMe Am -` �fRCGharpe Ca�auty .:. .........Greater ThaASO CF$) '� ® Plsrd Chaparral Streamsidm Vft WI L,• . • i .r?; Moist Asscciahoa :- , ®yam Wash Association "•) ;Exceswe and lkntatse Slop" ®® ®� Costal:Sage Association 4j r Satsmk Araae- .1 ®o®.Alaisl-Prldo Special Studies Zone s®®.City Adopted Special Study Zone LONSTRAINTS MAP Etiwanda North Specific Plan r, ciiy of Rancho Cucamanka 1 EXHIBITC 5 13 e, Front Line Fire Aoad- VACANT LAND-NATIONAL FOREST AREA 1 Exists Spring} r , rdman Croak nq t 1--- - it=0 Crook s I Existinfl A Bog -- J Exisihy{we Ex oulkeukdl lv i SprirZgEx" 2 F►m R t^ncos - s Da y oak Dam Two Hotnas an Gila T,• Ranger Station Site, on ay Cr ak Channm ''' San Setuins T r I t5illli>lslumn CTt1tl, :•:}:{'':`':'ai a -..- x gig Etiwandr Crm k Channel ' "' SpM 8rtsunda. L5 rds_ � -.. +sue.; .r- �• •srLateG `",•o..�. 'Qmant`Riatnt �' - :- �q$f?�t'•�+Fxs� _._. a rag Basin "ung iexse { a mission Uno ter a ' _ '•���-,��� 1 �w�r �_ �.�*.: �— 6tnfellltD :�' 8flf .�`tat(Qi� t Crook La , ^-�}ems' --•- `%� j bin tationl . r�•.�,w,.n�5ae•r,.��.$ �1Mytatp F*apa!tY I�reviotisH MnsaW Eo RaneA�CueaMaga Levee fisatrg6tatton mm Wat"TrAmNsalm Lkta •,•�_; +1�? Lv�`i'••'U.W aesuan.A..o.,ftafn o aopp zoos .00b Etiwanda North a� Specific Plan ' City of Rancho cucamorap „� EXHIBIT C 6 Jy Bon.j smafgn iU11-1 Fo_r_M, 1190f1 7�V ,AV UD :. � n 1 h t�c••,•'.; L� � � g� fit,;�r _ _� �., !f LEGEND sta ml9 maw vlmw -V Y' ta�� I� - �Cl�l70t� vm.co.n+9 VIEW POTENTIAL MAP Etiwanda North-, Spedfic Plan �4 City of Raoe*tucawsan r EXHIBIT . 4, Pipefina from Day Gunym _ _ « _ San w, no Natlone &,A .Pipeline from Smntf Tumtel. ? PipelinQ Irom a Tpnnei. Aakk ei — 1 i" Pipeline tram East Elfwanda Can on 7 _ - - Res.No.6c — It 12' it I - — --' 8. �,er-NasCB W.'�. •--_--a3. `. Pea.No.sc ? - t- TF Mtlafua>•etlan t�ia; ; �i :... WilionRe sc a wri8a® p.:. -aaetary®am a�ai26 asaaw'r.a ' ` WW.o. poyd W.Umkhe WTP .� connactcn, l g n s re s f fill 31 P \\ -- LEGEND tn...e.�r,n rat.. .:...«....«..PrapoeedCCWD Boundary Existing CCWD Boundary Ga*q Station a 12lia.Pipeline and DUmeter ® Raseivoir.', go, Metropolitan Water District(MI.W.dJ Connection Boaster Pump Station O Water TreatmentPlant(W.T.P.) » v Pressure Regulator Statkft MWMM Pressure Zone Boundary' i' 4 Pressure Zone Numw ®a. Existing Pipeline .e sotrec cUCainerva county Water District(0=)muter plan June for 0 1 00' 20 0' a Etlwanda North .: Specific Man City of Q,11fG;X)CUt�ll�ttRi "� " 8. -.EXKIB0T C } i3, p-/� / af, r y Sun Bomar'no Hall onai Fare 9taim t ir•Tl►�` � i � Syst�� ` H Wilson /.v 6' } f 4th Str et 7"" T f -77 Ban street ¢•: - -- _ -- r lli`..a.w�+rn teee�rro Flan .� x eapirtp @esUon ,..�' t..Et3EiVD Present'CCWID Boundary ww, otvssss Pipeline and Diameter enswe.(oio eo Existing Pipeline --i ° 1111111181115 Proposed District Annexation Area t Sown:Cucamonga Ceen(y%ii;.ks'tHat(CCWD)Master Plan Jtme 1967 -M SEWER MASTER PLAN- Et^.v a...e-earth Specific Plain 1 city m Rand ct.� tttt San 66mar MLIM IFuraat l7syCrRek Drainage Araa algege/trea '4�_ Drainage Area —a j 4lpper twandainercept Channel ' I Dey Creek Dam �- ` Etlwanda Reg Debris Dam 3 Basin j cavatneZJ 1 Hsnder{ "ppp Spreading ;A Bog Hydrology Study Area Anne! hanne n GraUnd�� �=-- — 30.E � 42'. '— Mamnne cnamte! _ _ 56-2 a l _ Upper Uw c soda t - —t3ag;arlal ustnllnaC. • _ Chennal a6'�— �' � kite C�'�lC Slt7il �� i �•�/ upreet$ttg Grounds ��' wt eo• 'r� / day Crdkk � � -�� �• �— Spfeadl 48 It A.OW60- Sen Seralno j Regional --- -- ---- -- -- Melnline , Upper EUwanda Rsglo"ml R4alnline Cttannol Basin* no42 4i ktattae LEGEND Regional Mainline Dratnage Facilities 511111MIUMM Master Plan Storm Drain T.Y yvaoaoeaar.A.DrainapeArea.Limits —aa—aae Secondary Regiocai Facility (0 Drakuoe/area bour4 rks oaalVoat to S8CFCD AMMnL !2)AND>Dse elaa,ere sODnuknsta:aefiral ct20c to Lo datfmfkw er a nfw n�rok,:ntny�aituc 0 tcoa 200T 40tlp', ;. ® Etiaeanda' North Specific Plan' Gty of Rancko Cetitnongr 1 J Fl : �� - ' San earnartll oNationd-oast 0$ i $ = QS ! FU/UC: `,- 7 b _ fi _ __ _ FL/UC — .,FLA Ual ctrrot[NFanL61AN ---®G c.e x Q FL/UC JbMLan ]*•T— r. ._. _ { .VL.. FC to-A Avenue. _ - _ LEGEND NMI Estate Residential O-f W,,j C(EtlWanda -Very Very Low<2 otraiAc Specific Plan) 6e0 station LQ Low 2r WWAC l.M Low MOdlum e-e ara/Ac f''o= Flood ControWillity Corridor N Neighborhood Commercial Hillside Residential a ar.tEtadWo Aero ' [ E Existing Schools -� OS Open Space © Acquired Park Sits Proposed Park Sllg tfoT@ Tim tlbs ohmm map not to garsaay a.md nor is the :• „. l l!!c taoaNan oNa epaellk.The OlSfetbn of a mitt,4 on Vacation of a Otalaeted future nod - tout may to adlustca ever toms u.the City&W iM Set"Vistrk)develop. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM'CNGA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ow 2 f t itiwand r North Specifier Plan City Of Rancho CucaffNinka 'SenTStrnar noHii;onat FJrnk Fes: FW Pq1 PC P011/10 i 1/10 P01/10 - PC 11181 4/2.5 PD11/10 f FW r t?D1/as - P01/1 _, - - -- - P®-tas1 Rs1/10 _ 51/1 P®-Rs 10 P02/1 FW (Itdt _P01/110 F Pw PC' ws. ,... - 3 � 3® ea-an�reat ® .,...® NO7E: tiumeriealtttarmltetotbwingttwtarW PC 1/40�i1'DU/40 ACRES a.tbn�Socefr Obn LEGEND: ^^ --- u�eyeslpnatbn ragrasntaattowaetsexoMy PB 1/10 =.y DU110 ACRES rov 6sslrp8t111on ofmtrftumparcelttre: - PC 1/2.0��1.06/2.5 ACRES M Preparty rtavievtty Mtwnad to nano euvamorip PC 1/1 =1 DU/1 ACRE tm-r • ' �w FIX Fioodway FNa 211 = 2 DUM ACRE vor.a.F ,� IN Institutional RJ 311 =3 01.1/1 ACRE PO Planned Development PD.411 =4 OW1 ACRE K8 Single Residential ,RS 20M -20,000 SO.FT.Mild. (IN) Inferred tnstitutional Designation LOT SIZE, +1 SRAIN EERVARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN LAND USE,,,;- WEST 9IALLEY FOOTHILLS PLANNING AREA O low' 2000' 40W ERiwanda Rlorth �. Specific Flan Evre. City f E1Rctto Cucamgft*= f ' t7 EXHIBIT "D" DISCUSSION: CONSIST;NCY WITH THE GENERi pLAN �c The following are highlights of proposed changes in the General Plan which provides consistency with the Specific Plan. LAND USE PLAN (see Exhibit "E-1") Residential: The open spa.ze designation north of'Highland Avenue, south of the upper `utility ;corridor, and generally.,east,, of"Day Creek "Boulevard will be changed to Low Density Residential, consistent with surrounding land uses. 'The Low Density designation between the upper and lower utility corridor and west of'Etiwanda Avenue will be changed to-Very Low Density Residential, consistent with surrounding land uses. Parks: A neighborhood park shall be located within each identified neighborhood. The size will be a minzmum of 5 developable, unencumbered acres. Schools: Three elementary school sites shall be provided. Each site shall be located adjacent to a neighborhood park, but must be a'stand-alone facility. Commercial: Two neighborhood comm ercial 'sites are provisionally designated, but the land use designation is conditioned upon completion of a site-specific markzt study supporting the use. Fault Zone: A 50-foot setback is required for, each side of an identified fault zone. The resulting 100-foot' setback shall be retained as public open space. A community ',trail is proposed within the fault zone. designation. CIRCULATION (see Exhibit "E-2") The plan provides the backbone circulation system suggestedby the General Plan. Etiwanda Avenue* Etiwanda Avenue ends at a "T" intersection with an east/west collector loop,road _immediately north of the lower power corridor. Etiwanda Avenue between the "T" intersection and Wilson Avenue is changed from a, secondary arterial to a'collector street. The name ,of Etiwanda Avenue north of Wilson 'shall' be changed. The purpose of these changes is to protect historic Etiwanda Avenue. Day Creek Boulevard: Day Creek Boulevard shall meet Wilson Avenue with a 4-way intersection:, The proposed curve shall be deleted. EXHIBIT "D." - Page 1 Wilson Avenue: Wilson Avenue shall be completed across Day Creel: ` Wash to provide one af•two east-west arterials needed to facilitate emergency vehicle access to the area. The name Wilson Avenue shall be extended from Milliken Avenue to the; eastern city Limit to Provide for :consistency. The road is currently .variously designated "24th Street,�,-,in conflict with another 24th Street within the City, and "Su(., it Avenue" with which it now connects. Banyan Avenue: Banyan Avenue shall be completed across Day Creek Wash, connecting with P ... i-eI`Avenue on the east side 'of Day Creek Channel, to provide one of two east-west arterials needed, to facilitate emergency vehicle access to the area. 1, Vintage Drive: Vintage Drive shall be completed across Day Creek Wash to provide a low utilization collector to serve as.a frontage road for the Foothill Freeway. Freeway Off-Ramps: Freeway, off-ramPs are planned for Day Cree; Boulevard and East Avenue. , Therefore, the upper and lower loop roads, as well as Banyan and Wilson, shall. connect to Day Creek and East Avenue to provide part of the backbone circulation system. Lower Loop Road: ' The lower loop road shall fallow the lower utility- corridor in order to maximize the use of developable property,north of the power corridor. PARRS AND RECREATION PLAN (see Exhibit "E-3"): Park sites shall be added as indicated in the Specific Plan. (Compare with Exhibit "C--3".) MASTER PLAN OF TRAILS (see Exhibit "E-411)z Trails shall be added as indicated L the Specific Plan. (Compare With Exhibit "C-3"4)` COMMUNITY DESIGN RESOURCES (see Exhibit "E-5"): Viewshed shall be added as indicated in Specific Plan. (Compare with Exhibit "C-7".) AGGREGATE EXTRACTION RESOURCE AREAS (see Exhibit "E-6"): No changes are proposed for this map. NATURAL R-7g OURCES (see Exhibit "�-7"); Several technical corrections are proposed for thi3 map. The spreading., ground areas shall be revised to reflect the San Bernardino County Flood Control District Map Designation. Also, the limits of vegetatior stall be revised to conform with the vegetation survey map prepared for the Etiwanda North Specifir. Plan. Finally, the bog and its hydrological study areas shall be identified. (Compare with Exhibit "C-5".) EXHIBIT "D" - Page �r AMk OPEN SPACE PLAN (see Exhibit "E-8"): c :several technical corrections are proposed,for' this map. The l hillside residential area shall be changed to reflect constraints. �)S identified by the environmental review process. Also•• 'the streanside woodland and water recharge areas shall be revised' to �f� reflect the aforementioned vegetation survey. Finally, propa'sed <; parks shall be added. " CCompare with Ekhibits "C-3" and "C-4".) ` 1 EXBIBZT "D" -'Page 3 a � i Q' ^ mLu .q 6. e �C? LL }O lu 3o �Uts" rO � �N.0wp¢_x M �Z.WJ Fl NCO � .�= ua `g 5'" pV > QQz0 CD x0LL0 �t ) UCC WI�U ti r_ ll e�� tt€t•pt.!r;f}f�fE?�aE.�' fit':'S a lipAK n , EXHIBIT E I C',0 "Z 2 _ zM V � V82p g oU) ® � oA �� a ci x how R 10w {{pyy, `pu rt LL a ae _ } e � i � wannw 3 e _ � rov i e —.J 1 � i p► s i U e i wR w.aa 7 � e fj I N � � Yo Qaw i!y W HillA N N;N u a if Z N QW! r Ir U. tit I: a (yj N �a.. v it 1� pp\�OpC�ip00�li pp n.pP NNFp •; 1 � � 1 1 „ A rpa� 1 ' -�._.S �� 4 ' Del a e�• �.© ' i ;� © f -- I. e 1 '�'yii� nTi- „ • p.. � B ED IDzF � . 1 a 4 � as •} ,I,a �� "® -�' � I $ e � p 2,P r w ZO a dau) a =O J '0 t u Q z * OZ _ x vy� sO., N cU6�� u�. da W N NOt� Oh O O ®� to 5 Ga rd W R¢ cr ,®w uL. O a ui F c"5 W o � io � � � ( MM s80 ci 1 pO p�0°DDOOq�ESEB °OO pbq°q 1 pO o � 0�0�.y71� � ♦ ` � IV�r.rvrwiw.. boo V �� y� to u1 00000�00000000000e ° 1 �o •x tadl"1 Yi oo � 00bpO a s t 00000000$00000r �.°a oEi r e u q gryY atN/ D°OggqOqqqbOO�f OOogbbODO°O°bo OD°00 e ° i �V61 W n wi 0 C;l3� � racaa• 1 1 D ES aPp gD°0°D .w1. `.LM`.111-pu�OOJG °O°b°D W W 1 D ,.�.Y ° Pt i Maryan 1 1 1 p 1 G a0�pp1 1 q sl ® i 1 1 0°0 {mot El i + C t rtaaaam ° S A � S = '� 1 0ooeool;°ca.'.r•'� ■ `mod. a 4 EXHIBIT E 4 W Z go ul ® p � (a� p �e►� C � l. cusOtnc� a� a 7 U to x Z O 8 fE gio OC O � \ !N 0 o \ \ RN ;�'1%}ram,.•-�-�•--" ' EXHIBIT E 5 3.C, 1)_30 d , cc �z� CCCCO20 a U. ui� • 1 - 1 - •- 'ram All ._�. �. :.� y e.Y i i - S 111 ' :a z 0 ,\•4 'tea .®. II' "� _ - ems.• c�s,.m�p s - �� 1 ��! . {s LL j Y `mono i j•- i . 9 6 - I --- - EXHIBIT E T � � •32 o ul z � a YJ 110 LY ul LU IL Csr ................. JA1}t•1.•• tM�:• �� Silt tt ; l.•a_� � �.._i: 1 :: aM al • ..w 1 ld..i9otl sl-1 1 L i1 � f t ' I C i 22 i 1 '.- iamil URI 6 EXHIBIT E 3 �; "-33 r ,b y v. i' " L 5EMON 1 1.a nva�,4Dy rloN , The Etiwands.North Specific Flan (ENSP) arim comprises approximately,6,840? 7es, of which approximately 530 acres have recently been incorporated into the city. Approximately 915 acres of the 6,840-acre specific plan area contains privately held parcels within the San Bernardino National Forest, which is outside the'City of Rancho C:ucamonga's Sphere of Influence. The propos(� annexation of Edwanda North would eVend the city's boundaries north to the San Bernardino National - Fort%% as originally intended ay the city's founders. It is the intent of the ENSP to ensure that development of the study:area occurs in a comprehensive and symmatic Mannar tl-iat is consistent with' the long-range development.plans stated in the city's general plan. The specific plan area is designed to 6L;' rJ the low-density image and ucighborhood character of the original Etiwanda coma.°unity of Rancho Cucamonga north and west. The site is defined as having ` five neig hborhoods: Day Creek,tipper Etiwanda,the Oaks,Etiwanda highlands,and Chaffey. Each of the neighborhoods is defined by large open spaces and is designed to be distinct from the others. The project would allow for the implementation of 3,613 dwelling units,28 acres of neighborhood commercial developmem,public schools,and recreational opportunitio,as well as retaining 4,112 acres of the 6,840-acre si--in open spate. The open space system would include visuallypromhwwt ridgelines and hillsides;Day,Etiwanda,and San Sevaine creeks, and Day f,anyon. The ridgelim,hillsides,and creels areas provide a visual backdrop to the development aresa.ard enhance the scenic nature of the ENSP area, 'the project includes a system of roadways designed,to accommodate tic from the specific plan area,as well as that projected to occur with development of the current general plan densities of the surroun6ing region. The ENSP establisbes'the arterial and collector circulation framework, while subsequent planning will define spe. alMaine=and placement of local streets. The system of arterial roadways serving the specific plan area would be Werronnected with the Route 30 Transportation Corridor,which would traverse tha soul& portion of the specific plan area ' rszrota000sa �°`ti.. 1-1 (j t� —3 V 1.2 SSIMA�ARTr'1DI?S Tt�+!'fAN OF TH p ®WM Awl®Pl Ibis document is a'Program EIR. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the lead agency for she proposed project and has discretionary authority oval the primary project approvals as;defined by Section 15651(b)of the State CEQA Guidelines. The city is requesting the review and approval of the follow' ing discretionary actions at this time. Certification of a Program Environmental Impact Report(EIR) Approval of an amendment to the City of Rancho Cacamnnga General Plan. ® Alprovai of prezoning for parts of the ENSP Adoption of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Subsequent actions include,but,are notlimited to,master planning and tract map approvals. These action would require an environmental assessment and may i:equire additional sndlor more detailed environmental study. Applicants for development within the ENSP area would:provide additional _ environmental studies,as required by CEQA 13 ]7?ENBYI+I<LD e+:+:eECl514IRQ = AN6D IS='TO BE'REML�EID There are sever 1 Uem of contmvzrsy related to the project that were identified through the public review process. The following summarizes those primmy issues whidr c.`uld involve significant I environmental effects: • Conversion of open spsoe to phtmlue commm unity uses. ® Intensification of urban land uses in proximity to taisttag residential uses,near the ENSP yea. a Loss of equestrian tots within the Equestrian Overlay I}isWcL ® Extension of urban development emedy and northerly toward open space areas and National Forest. a Availability of future suppled water auIo-P13'from the a'Vlrsajapolitaa Water ® improvement of spreading g Gand ftilities to irnpmve grouadwaZar recharge capacity, * Ultimate flood contml faculties at Day Creek,Edwanda Creek,and$ffi Sevame 78:AtISOtmD5.1 12 �, , o ^3s o Loss of state responsibility area fire protection services for wildland fires. Agh ® Future disposition of sand and gravel operation(rock crusher)in Day Creek. ® Funding for fuel modification maintenance in accordance with the ENSP Fire' Protection Study., ® Funding for police services. ® Funding for parks to meet the city's general plan goal of 5 acres per 1,000 residences. . a Removal of alluvial fan scrub and biological habitat acreage. 9 Generation of substantial levels of traffic► et will be added to the circulation system. e View impacts to San Bernardino National Forest. a The impact of the proposed project on the natural and manmade environment, including but not limited to the following: - Existing and future circulation system - Biological resources Aesthetic and topogrssphical changes Water and groundwater quality Noise increases Air quality changes Issues to be resolved prior to project imple zeumflon include those to be considered in the review of the propo$ed pmjec�,and those t-�be considered during subsequent levels of planning. Within this draft Environmental Impact Repoi` (DEIIQ are project alternatives that are evaluated in terms of comparative environmental impacts. In the review and consideration of the proposed project,the lead agency(the City of Raw1v Zucamapga)must also cot alder the project alternatives. Also during the review of this EIR,agency and public input may be received regarding potmdal impacts of the project and wbether or how to mitigate the significant imp&cts. Additions or'changes to the mitigation measmm identified in the DER may occur in conjunction with pwjea;approval and,implementation. In addition to issues to be resolved as part,,of this MR, certain MrOmnental issues cannot be addressed,at the specific plan or general pl;®n level, it se more-precise development plans are needed. These issues will be addressed and resolved atft UM,more detailed levels of planning. Such issues are specifically identified within relevant sections of this EIR(e.g., biotogy,topography, grading plan,traffic,hyrtroligy). �i rn2rotaaoosa 1-3 (� "; 1.4 ALTIVA°1^fVp� In accordance with Section 15.35(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines, altematiyrs to the proposed project-are evaluated iu this DEIR, TSie Alternatives Section,(St�ftt'on 5) provides a descriptive analysis and evaluation of the following alternatives: • No ProjecUWo Development • City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan • County of San Bernardino General Plan ® Consortium of Etiwanda North Landowners Alternative 1.5 EMMMUMM EMW. AND fvdITYC.+!'1�01°d n�a�ii1RF6. j' The following pages provide a�lummaty-of the potential impacts of the proposed project,measures that would mitigate project P J -sgecific and cumulative impacts to the extent feasible, and remaining impact of the specific plan project after the application of mitigation measures. 'The,significance of each impact before mitigation is indicated by abbrcviations that parenthetically follow the summary statement.These abbreviations are:S r sigOicant isppa t as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and NS g impact that is Mi significant according to'CEQA. '1 Q4 (4 JB2 INOD5.1 1-4 �,�J 3 7 1 cog q 4 V �e 3vt C• VJ 1r W fAAl N yS ed o e a F3Olz v a` a CDC,D, � All too o� eo 43 &�' E' ar ti•tC C Is•� u tl� a o G ,w Ee� egs'� iszMIWWSXS 1-5 7 IDS z '.,.+ m d Gh •� a m rr a = 9as15 as� a� a a�L�� •�� a � •a _� Y 1 l< '¢ C •� 0 Cl d7 js I 1? 7w .� a' WE P7 Ac Iffi/CIlffiGWS.E4 1.( -39 c cts O a ° 0 n oa C9 oo tom' 79 - Cc M. a !' S on,- a io pa Nam. ... p� U nCd� ta w:p9 3.1 ...ipC.C' % CG �f} •CI }}��5;; .L d ¢ PC• _w•U .Dp1. i ffi. r CY V. FA tg ts C6� .d tq b 'O T. � U. C4 q �- is v - cWSsaD "' ca..� ass Wve' a ` 13 ID v L e ors �v oo �• a F9`�o � �oc.•� e � �3 � r.•o � ro«3 Ps 1-7 �r U a PIEtac• a d � a o� a SM 93 1 194- A If all Ell z c- a�szro�soaass4 73, ,1) -- V1 ` t •. r 11 �BE .P. Pti f Ali as IV g q Cam �+ s Qyy a.,aSSi,o is a w , a`5.� ca p Ro � 8.1 ::i , : a �.�-za, IffiN;60QQS.Es �` c d Am .D W 6•+•�... C H 6I• l .4 W•�ref � �. �' ..3 .e±X�'.p.. �. . . - tica a=j '- a nn 11449 go'$ �Fz'.� CBI Q' w BCiI Off)is 0' 4� 64. fir'I.ILIr`i ad S .'� O�q� Q O 0.va v � 3 ro�:000s ss 1-16 3 e,0 y� cog a a a � e o•a o �d ��Tw��o u ���,�$,a o OO C '= fJ A G M 0pwq C u O yS&17 G C] p/ to •o� as w ",o .n ��A.�� � � �,�'�c..fl�, m oEolt �,s'� a: oa5b � M. ro v C $. 1 ,r .ez3 �j tet�tj! 8 G 2 ay, u._ p lam,,raaa.9 o K � `. c t lit04 sc tz 8 o. �- a �ol. nwimims :. it . •EWt. bi t ..Art AW Cs c c t4 41 o jabCO CZ .,9-a 9 'ate sw .Iola am �a+ ..n 6i �: �• ['�E C.•a7 S'l.-e�. -18. Lam" r4Al At a.. - ,.� '_ C�mair a U3 w u w -9 G aMCIs mr. .. 637�< � �.� a.+�G�-33 FA if a � v a � > 3tl C-S AS 10 'o�i W &� u 1ysi 3rr: « m as raaroieaaos.�ss W3 U cz � � � Yo o nq o e � a e�i 83' �,•_ pC a Fad w •.Y. G�°C �° a oa A v o Rcn IN v G a qq $� a o c aka a L' � •S �E s�<� a�t:G�H�� 6.�� �- t+y�{jam c� � Cd vt s5 � if 1 pp C •` d • 0 rBxtaita�s Fs 1-14 i- Ora 03 Us s go > b a 'J e,L as 1 E K ia Wa to 01 v = es n C},�Ftt av 8 .n .n. n w �' � 4'!.� Gad., n � � � � 'Q�is�� �.�• �,�'�� 1w, ' a� -o m I tA f �trotaaws� � 1-25 v [ . 0 owpMAEo eu is aa• vW ges ' b C L� O Z7•,U^` R ca O'd a pa u.`��. 0.5 a0�'�Q:m �� at aL17,Z�7 Da a W C;, C:6.ram JO �.A off•= �� .� � o reuuc�raos.es Y-16 .," t! J' rp - st4 C. 4 .°'a' � � i i+ C. �.•- O a, co•ate. G y ,e, ® � � e A .S AM . Q.° w ,C, e.'3 ex 9 �. °03 e0r cF'•.'0,� "L'y u. !b $ -li e i z r i I ) Gy a _ �+L�aalas.r� 1-17 - r o t r` o: ca rj 93 sm Ri c 1 a�i s bz` a o p i cu CS .20 in t,'$ y e 49 r( fr r � j _r �a000s ssAftJ1 e U Ash ycy _ ® V1 Q t w L q NrO� S42 vic vato � � x;a: e> eon q r • 'Iw" �,.a i0 ;.'yG• M �. � 09��f• _.� > � y ami c IM c5 ®Y O r g w aw 5 1 � 3 13 '® .� `" o 't�owa � woe's � o ac Cl r shy+ •�c��. e��+1 9�i• :J rN �y�.�. •S° p O. 8VE Qd'i lag 44 w 91 WES �U aw as c .. 7!S]J018DDD5.F�i l�19 c` =s2 o �1 cot (I/ boa As c CG.a l E i a A 33 g 9 � g cy 49 ES any@}'�, w of m O (�? .8 v isxo,e000s.Fs � 1 act .� -53 (J ! �O s ' 1 9; $M 4 i O V � s •� o� � UW `,o'a �Eo � h m� to 040 f G� g.0 0 �t t G Z d m iy a W U� [tl p a3 ;xa a 8� zo � er � � T gsle Isa m9a $ d � As Co ` e w� o V =� r, u OM CC) yo `� TP IS 44 w AN vA vi 22 TA ZVI 12 f, p(((pp��prrr��)ooe S ti O QQ a7 1:9; Y i Vol sa C) �f � tz ao = N a .: ..t a - '�rya' v m:- I I I Wen t.t 40 rA.,C ill Fi W w7`'U G rq s 'fit C9 co � �+� a'� o�c ar � d •pe•-�wa E'1 «'ri is A.., �a o '�'v s' at ggm� G a 0 m o w 6?v .41,A n,s o.,., u.� d a. log tt e py= N A 8 y y o. 4-0VJ W. OWO _ p o�1L'qp `tee. b0 C CAM en. TA JffiNISM.ES ]_ o - � Q _ y Aug ✓ i .N c ' ;i O ��•w O bF �e'Tar v� cn �, o V o a+�3 ,,, �y b $` 9 �d `•,yam ;w'�,x r°nIN, y �G� a y� � •a�.T. C� w sa o '� I C A c t� � QI j az IT t ` ciaoa�s s r I24 u 't.t - ��a z , j 9 c3 o t»'•+ o q •2 Ig *46 Ira U a 1; .. cow �I I �B2/OIi0.705 f9 - i 07 a2 J E. 26 1991 P.C. AGENDA of 10 �. � _ 6� ° •m*0 L' .r.r '�.A� r�"T...4 O � 6'�..ad �ati6 �•R,A btOa2 o,rat 3 o .2 5 Toga .d G ,I ® t I !` r, f CD .� Ankk v u yF Cd CD C� �.M •d3 � V�. Ci .00 A. ..7 C as ce. .;-M C � pp iw.�,� m^'y �j ,:� � +' �� : a•w,6.,O a °+� G � cra�+ w d0 �= o,a a o� g ' �3 O G7 r,�zrotao�as. s 1-27 �o a m U Rf i7 N 4 Octl o�o h '• as o. ea .� J q p ,�O'S� �q � �9_` y of �•�_� '� G.�`� �'E7 t^ C W•ta`R3 wR7. �r w. la S� �-..�a p,K•� G be C's 79 tic .00 bagcd 029 ME jJ Liz a � rsarotsaaos. s 1-28 ` 5~ a7 ' cc `A a Z. gs'g;� o c "Jw �' '> G p� •-0D � • N..A �y spy spy �) �yyw{+ p9 •p_n ,t{a�� Q V� Pi Gi•® �y�� H:. A GYS- b•7 CO i0 ��O] s d N� i V 7 /01£U�JJS.B ZS W 0.z - VJ LaJ� n a`1 y QY H�C C O,cyG� _OC �,� "WI ..'�A o�+ asa �' Pl w � a q E o o s .,oIs Z �' ju 0 1 _ 70 �1 4.9 � FaF 7 ZIz � roisoaos. I-30 r M Erm may+ CC E wE'� Jew AM s 04 E.v am o a ao Ewa ' ca� e� o �vo w �. � «� .0 C O a� .�. `;.: �.fl ram' �•�.. ® BP AI .92 93 � C •� 04 v yy gW U d r` b4 co go I m Q mycts e 0 cm aEdo a— o o n o «CAaU ;g V !6 w W o o.o.22 La �+ vm o•- ,ems id 41 ~ _ CD Eb o' er °� �w wAt -9 D: 1 ;n a�� v� 8 IL wooBAS (� wed_• Qa n v _d 0 0 ® =m i� cow o 0 nwi m ms 1-32 C,D " 5 �AskU�Z yo R4. oac olm ro ��=' U 6 o E.ywus° = cu S L9 °'"ro o ate; o 0 0 W eC y o :e a+SL ea' .O_61 G N 1/J a E o.ri c d�a23aav E a ..m hofdo wwowIi' , 5E' a e -" oo r o C4. w.�' e o -= or u A E E d o 10 ca pbyl C7 d O P-i ID goo o_ s G$ �an® s��_ �o A� b Iw � mi; 0o> C6.0U Il oF� o eoc �� Q i3 � '- °6° � w ` MM18=5.E$ 1-33 C � wl ,Q � rd Etaca m d p ocQa � :Jc -a n 2 n c t ac and o� a c c o o ' e cl E � uW' c 0 � 3 ® � o� o00 w f o G; N y ��0 c W r a ad DB7JJIif37DS G3 /�.� 1:3 1 _ ^' � q � E E� �' •v 2 @ •O `n3 _L+d�y c>,X��.rao aioi " � �'8�•a� a �' ado= _ �_ V S 1 V 03' aocl.E.o �d � m� � uE Q'w Sao � aoi a� .Va.`;p � via ea` °' :Bis CA � � g �?�a� � ,cc o o Q 402 u � •�,�w O �,� �a.a � w �.c � �� s •c� a � a v E > a �0 8 � O�s � � a` s ?� a �+ ' u� g goo°q� G o $ samwv o $""AA a u c:6�� "� as c q � s � .� _ � _ g 3 ao O, syN$ c° m CO -;. gg Z. razro]WWS.Fs 1-35 i w .I .m r qn a O CyF O a Gd '., 414 y gqam..... VJ p.•$ ES t lz m�� � o � , g i..fig ; he o jr .a � ccpsrm rsvo�:aoos.� ;35 U o � tip W p G•ai p �� �0 d �o y a C' Q � DO E u. tr0 Pa =V ,�;s. �7•t) Y e+ � " � � •��� Y. is °9 •40 K51 C o o FS �p., i isamttwooss 1-37 3 _C� _ 7o U CO a� � d`•'"'eev u Cd �\ Lag-at-2 . v� � � ai3 aAtS . tiro>a. yaT ° ar�V 0.9 tfi 79 � '� a a ate . m c 3 o $ V. � m I 13 IM rail +�i -fl py�� � �� MCA {$ "� Y y�� �►" �1 ,r� r s 1-3s 13 CO — 7) i� O a 7Q9 n� OR gx o a dm W E'S cnntL r E 19 a _ 75 s. Jd ro- v— o iszroIWWS.ss 1-39 — �� 72. 4® .a an o e c > �. E S 'D w _ w o cy o a P �4 �� a a oa c arOr- Sa ax a .°.: o 0 y ai �„Qp .fit q dgdj ° p Elm A V Q W O - JS .� 0 MEe Min O: 9� c, 11 ti8C ej"^ Tia�i > w8 o c 'o v o � y i° r` _ 000 day `� a JZw, wl'� a� �m•a as b �N -0y � e i �tl 000a� �3 � C? oG ^ ;:� mFrctl8= 5 , ate, L' hC6-off e a < s,. as" f� cx MI S � r�.oteooas.rs 1-41 W__ d U � . m G7 ro� ao a IA 3 $ RZy� a 03 • O O G a e5 y� � L. Li v � ooIlk sa •`gam' � .. a•G dos i tiT' �s000sss 1-42 7. 'r Q} R • � 4 I L' Q;tpa., C �N U a q tf El p! W a v. 'i- a y•L W � L9 a '..�R1• ii = R� t. Cl. 10 13 9. O C•C..WL � 61 �g�3�W�;S�II+ _ �,C.i � � C7•.�^ W QQ C 0.5 (y. C as 00.E Q ap, E? a. a ...•o rayIs y ila Ct7 8n Be M Ilk ,. G! ••ter � d qq h �La � �12W Q orra rj c O EN CCg� •� � Rj etl d ra �scoa.Es 1.43 /3,C 0 ,ti' .a G Fa O p a'N..C e1.8 .0 C 8. it 8 al W,c es rl sm ca r JwtmD5.FS a E ASIX o 1-4 LD °' ��'a w S'aoo IAuk 0.0 a � � � ��'6D'a� sa :a o �'� 'C•3 0 0 0 � �w a �,�'•1.o ,I se~y .7 ae °9' ®.'G+N p$•'� 'o- ' @ !'°• SS iJ�TJ W C/it a f4 g 1 I �m O. G17 6J'J�N� bOq G _ r m v � b v B IP.i2AD1E0905.�5 �.. ��5 13C - r `p _ U Ir R! oS ag _ � d �•��:w��•iJ a �� �eJ��. f bps ww 00 a v s CJ d a O'n � ro �g .E Q o.; } 1-46 CO - 7Y` 11 ft 1d W ti f �go JSw� a.wAdVss�o 4 ;� p u.8 :g tie - 04 o S� a° v a w icy M�. i3�'�E r' �:: �•�;�.��' � ?� `o5 xn � A oqA > b• b '�•(�pp�p -,= �� � 7•O .:i r @ $ Pa•ef <o<CUv cn:5w u 8 � vFj;WG o U V �sro;go¢ass Fa I-47' : v �O BP E a w ,����CCC4 `tt1 � O :a _ w :s��3 IS � U �.�" yaw gal a ao .o- Au a '" cis a��� �'�.��_ �" ����<W Q=•� � at v ,I I a Y z7 0 1 3 cap , v �o €o a to CD M 45 ..Q v3 v .— � 41 mot y bag tQ ca w a°'n �y n Jr RION H 6� K O �$ n � O w S M. w . O lot A � r�zroeamos fis 1-49 �12- i U 0 x zz o d C9 v� a O19 y� ab4 R.^ O s+ � � a v C A .. a �. c am in Qk ip c� j'.aEc. C� IV xd „ C�d C a0 � �o w [ g p etl IS7JOfE000s.Hs i SO i � W s Pn E'm Te a a � olf ft' �o E Si .. c-23 0 m .o v �r w 6 u a gad , o Q= n � ga E a >xuottwoos r� i 51 v z a L Cd 1r 8 $ 40 a mvb osoil PAIDL o -�• o•�S.�g Ar. c'00�w..c�y, Ali ucia000s s 1-52 - June 25,1991 Ms. ROW Bran Associate Planner Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O.Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 W.Zany Henderson,AICP Principal Planner Planning Division IMW Civic Center Drive P.O.Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 RE: DILW ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO.89012314 Dear Ms.Bratt and Mr.Henderson, Thank you for your notification of the above referenced document and completed Draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Our comments 0 these documents are contained on the following pages and are intended to act as our public response to the notification we received from the City of Rancho Planning Commission dated June 11,1991 for the following projects: • Environmental Impact Report for Specific Plan 90-01 and General Plan Amendment 90-03B City of Rancho Cucamonga • Environmental Assessment and Specific Plan 90-M-City of Rancho Cucamonga • Environmental Assessment and('�r,-e-tal Plan Amendment 90-03B-City of Rancho Cucamonga ®I+1rrh�►rroly landmark land Company of California,Inc, enters its objection to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for including Landmaides property in anyplan whose stated purpose is to create a platform for annexation of Landmarles property into the City of Rancho Cucamonga As is stated M Section 1.1 of the ciVs Draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan(ENSP),the domment 14muld,among other things,"act as a pre-requisite to annexatioa of the(plan]to the City of tlancho Cucamonga' Therefore,we object tc bur property and it's boundaries being included in a document for this purpose. J9 C, t� LANDMARK LAND COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA,INC.,PO.aox 645,Calirna.G,California 92320 714-795.8941 Respowe to ENSPSpedfir PlaTVDMR CiteofRanchoCWiMM a, At the present time landmark Land Company enjoys property ownership within the unincorporated ter,11tory of San RemarO^.o County outside of the corporate city V hits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Addition airy,much of Landmark's property falls outside of the Sphere of Influence of the City. We believe the maps contained within'ihe ENSP,beginning with hkfiibff3 on Page 1-8 as well as those same maps copied to the Draft Environmental Impact Report(DEIR)for same to be incorrect insofar as theyto indicate certain lands owned by landmark within the city's Sphere. These maps should be corrected as well as provided in a scale suitable for proper analysis. Consistent with our objections stated in the preceding paragraph we further object to being annexed into the Cityof ZRancho Cucamonga's Sphere of Influence. COMMENTS ON13RM FTIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN 1. As stated uevicrusly,all exhibiirs contained in the ENSP document whic'n indicate land owned by Landmark land Company of California being either within the city limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga orthe Sphere of Influence of the City should be revised. Efi M 4on Page I-10 corti.-n$a small graphic in the lower left corner which 1. Indicates property o�Amed by Landmark Land Company within the Sphere. of Influence of the City of Rancho Cucammiga. z Indicates property owned by Landmark to be in area pre,iously annexed to l Rancho Cucamonga Consistent with our previous requeshk maps such as these(including EthiLi&gthmvgh11,13and14,16andf7,a'9 Z? wzfM should be revised and provided in a scale suitable for proper analysis 2 BfiifW on Ne I-8 indicates an area outlined in a cww.Hnear pattern and labeled `Bog'. We will provide comment on this airs later in this letter,however,we feel this label to be out of scale ao:well as factually Incorr-ect since the nature and erlgln of this area has not been esteblished beyond mere opinion. Since this exhii,acts as the base map for further generations of maps we also,by reference to A&M.7 on Page I-8, obje,.tto these succeeding exhibits S. Contained within Section 4.5 OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS-is a goal to"preserva and protect the fresh water bog gong with a°200-foot wide buffer of natural vegetation and the upstream recharge comdc-adequate aacesstonatural hydrological resources,and appropriate protective fencing ' The nahire and origin of the'hwh water bog":-still an open issues Accordingly,it maybe premature to attach such significance to a feature whose'hydmloScal 2 ti? V - I:h�OfR>iMl1000i8111".>fl�p _ . resources"have yet io be ascenzined. It is equally premature to provide such non- specific and misleading language such as"the upstream recharge corridor"when.such a feature may not exist. r.lscs contained within Section V.OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS is a goal to Vreserve the Forest Service site and an adequate sumatmding area for parking,trail head,rest rooms,and picnic facilities for public use`and enjoyment' The former Forest Service site mentioned in the ENSP is little more than one acre ire size. The surrounding area is owned by iamimark land Company who would not consider sale of this property to the City for Yhe purposes of providing rich uses as parking•and publicrestmoms. landmark is providing nearly 250 acres of open space, much of it in pristine natural area accessible by hiking trails; It is not clear why.the City would provide for such a goal when public use and enjoyment has been incmpoibted into Landmarks plans. 5. BaW 9provides the boundaries and orientation of the Neighbonccod The nes for the ENSP.We have noticed that you designate the area of our proper y as"Oaks"and state that"the neighborhood will be characterized by native field stone entries and pilasters with native Oaks and Sycamores' TK-;theme is consistent with our plans for the'area. For further inktrtmation the City shcrakd further consult the OakSumnrdt . DevelopmentPlan which is an file with the Carty of San Bernardino and which has previously been provided to the City. 6. DaW gals©provides a curious..set of lines indicating,apparently,the location of trees.These areas do not confoem in any way to our development plans or an approved str`et matrix in the vicinity. The map should be revised to indicate existing approvals and development pl-y.rs. 7. Tabfe2-C?o and UseS`faffOcalgw mmshovmonPagelt-14proWdesiLr542acr of Residential Net Acreage with 379 Dwelling Units. This taL:a is inconsistent with the general-depiction of the Oaks area provided on.& Lzif Sand fails to consider land use approvals existent in the area. Landmark Land Company currently has approval for 453 units an 453 acres within this area.,Ultimate development within.this area will include approuimately620 dwelling units on 7613 acmes. The land use matrix should;be revis:'d to provide ft,r,,cur rerrty approved plans and a ,more realistic land use scenario. r', 3 Ras w b13SPSpedficF1sm1DELTt Cityof kUa0 C=unwsp S. On page II-19 of the Draft ENSP in the openingparagraph of Secfsvn790PF,VSFA E AI DTRA1LSCO.VCFjT`the diverse biological and wildlife habitats found in the bog'is mentioned. Since it is yet to be determined if this feature is indeed a'bog`this statement is questionable 9. Page II-21 in discussion of the Community Park/Equestrian Centerprovides the "contribution toward the acquisition and development of the equestrian center shall be a condition of development for all tracts which have a minimum lot size of less than 20,000 square feet which are in the General Plan Equestrian Overlay District." It is highly questionable whylots ofless than 20,000 square feet should be singled out to bear the brunt of funding a regional faallt;;'when,br the very nature of their economy,they are less likely to meet the financial profile to afford a feature which proportionately few will utilize. Further,no discussion is provided nor any criteria pesented which attempts to iltustrate why 20,Lr00 square feet is the correct size to levy fees upon Other than an arbitrary finding;that bemuse the City is c..ninilftA to equestrian activity we feel drat the City should provide I_ a. The number of residents within the extended community which cmlently own homes and will Mely do so. b. Other statistical data which support the afo•ement-med focus on lots of 20,000 square feet or Ir-s. c Maps indicating the boundaries of the?questrian overlay district. d. The DEIR forthe ENSPfails to address the health and safety issues associated with ha�.�ng horsed 1'close pivArnity to ion-equestrian oriented]anti uses. The DEIR should be revised to include such a discussiar.. 10, Bdiib#J,9-B,nw p3ceand Dw.&f3anprovldes two Community Equestrian Trails th:-ough property owned by Landinark land Company. nis plan fails to consider the fact that this property is under private ownership with approved land use plans. Further,plans have been made available to the City of Rancho Cucainmiga whin indicate the possible allowance of equestrian trails over and/or adjacent to thi~ property in different locations. Bd6&Ill takes a capricious approach tothis private property by Ignoring the aforementioned and directly bisecting Gandmarl:s property with traits which are incompatible with Yandmarks development plans. Additionally, the scale of trails depicted on the plan would.provide in excess of 3W feet for each such trail. 4 RR?cmtoEN3PSpeaacR&vDF t Citpof RWK6 Cur TrffgF I The City should seek to place these trails within areas currently designated as easements and again review the plans which Landmark has provided. These plans provide the links which the pity is s.^oking and in land more sceffle and suitable for such pzirposev a 1. .Sexv'on 733cn page I1-:25 provides thhat local equestrian trails shall be established as'`a condition of development within the Very Low and Hillside Residential Dishct planning areas where the mirlimum lot size is 20M square feet. The purpose of the trails is to provide safe equestrian access to community and regional traits. Again, why tots of less than 2qO square feet should;be singled out is not provided ,nor any critera presented which attempts to illustrate"Why 2g000 square feet is the correct size to levy this exaction.upon. Other than an arbitrary findirg that because the City is committed,to equestrian t activity we feal that the City should provide those items listed in Nt aber 9-above 12 -%uVon 73don Page U-27 illustrates that the site immediately adjacent to the Day Canyon Flood Control area provides a potential trail-head location This area is completely unacceptable to Landmark land Company. The provision of l pubic alines including public r e trooms accompanied by the waste associated with equer. ,an activities is clearly incompatible with upscale housing. As stated previously,,equestrian trails arz�pmv dedin our land plan. The city should wVors other areas more compatible with the features of-equestrian activities and provide discussion of these alternative within the context of the DEIR 13. The Cncul3LOW HW-B&M 11 on Page II-30 provides for a street matrix inconsistent with approved plans and the County of S2n Bernardino General Plan.-;Property owned by Landmark land Company currently includes entitlement for 453 dwelling mi is on 453,acres in the area adjacent to the northeriyrnost collector streets shown on this exhibit. The exhibit should be revised to indicate the north/south oriented collectors to be aligned generahly with Etiwanda and Hanley Ave. " 14. Sign 1.3.2�.SW mm 4I on Page IV-13 requite that"the faun knoll be set aside as a public park contiguous with the bog., Park uses shall include passive recreation,rest moms,and trails head parking for Mers and bicyclists" Please see our previous comments regarding the Compatibility of placing a public park in this location at the exper:se of other more suitable sites. 71re same section goes on to state that this knoll was"formed by the fault'. Data supporting this claim should 5 Resrm tOEIIWSpedficl:'bxVD=, CitYOfFxAOCUMMMtP be provided within the DEYR it is further 6tated that.lMorically,1he site has beep-+sect by the public as an ovetlock of the valley with viewsson a clear dayto San Gorr'. }and.San Jacinto to the east, . Saddleback Mountain to the sgtffi,and the ocean ti thewestLl 11be knoll should be reiained for public use! ibis statement is misleading in both fact and context. Since �v the site is remote from existing urban land uses it stands to reason that only a minuscule portion of"the public has"historically'used the site,as�an overlook. Further,the portrayal of this feature as something of a community resourw is also inconsistent with.the historical use of the site for ii a ght:nglwatchrg pwposes.;It also fails to,be mentioned that fhe portion of the knoll devoted to the previous ranger station is only a very small percentage of the knit The re mainder of the knoll is,as it always b:s been;under private ownership'- Each of the major attributes of the knoll provided which are described in the c ity's passage in this section can be achieved in a superior fashion,affording far greater flews,in areas made accessible by the plans pri3vided by landmark Land Company and currently on Me with the County of San Bernardino. A courtesy copy has been previously provided to you fear your reference. 15. .s'ec&w I33i Sol ram Don Page LV 14 also states that as unique bog is located to the east of the knoll and shall be preserved The bog was formed by tilted fault blocks which capture underground and surface runoff water in a shallow dePM&gion The bog must be furry identified and preserved:Its water sources shall also►be ldentined and profectect." This set of ,,icros should be reassessed respect to the facts associated with this feature. Despite the Information circulated ahIJut this feature to slate,we were unaware that such hard evidence existed so as to provide the inescapable conclusions reLiched above.A readingof the DEIR associated with the project failed to cast any adc.titional light on this subject. Respme to ENSPSpecific P.IWDEIR - Citgaf RanrhoGras►sars+ga ,.` COI-AMENTS ON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTREPORT MWANDANOI't'I`H SPEC:MCPLAN SCH No,89012314 rtdmm3tl�attc �JSri�Yd9ly+DfCa t3ltljarlllC.O�Sj2CgSt(bttilQttiSt'O� j1SSuu Oulu Ful a pmoning procedure for the purposes of annexingits prep-IY into the ay of Rancho Cucamonga Such a discre'donmy action is presented in Sectiord2- We fwther comment on the following areas and suggest revisions to the DEIR document Fagesl-band 1-7 Proposed mitigation measures include a rw,mirement that,sine tl)ttiprojed is irrthe civs equestrian overlay distr:14 applicants for development of lots less bran 20.11M square feet shall contribute to a minimum 25-acre equestrian site and equestrian boarding facility in, ccordance with the infrastructure plan. Comment- :( No criteria is provlded, 3 frtcticate the type of contribution which would be trade,the betwefm the impact caased by the development and the benefit of the facility. Further,no data or criteria are provided to indicate the reason vrhy 20,=square feet is used .Lastly,no mays or illustration is provided indicating the boundaries of"the r iVe Egdestrian Overlay District: �i 1-9 The promineiit knoll adjacent to the peat bog shall be dedicated fora tqssive park of a minimum of 9l acres oC err mi, This is not a mitigation measure for the loss,of ope i space !passive park which,as provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Etitwanda North Specific Plan, would allowpublicfau duties and associated wastes,actacentto residences creates other objectionable healtfi and safety impacts which nnzt be analyzed. $ i Further cornments are reserved and provided in the later section of the DEIR relabd to this subject:; 7 Jr Rnpa=to ENSP Spacific Ran/DE1R Gityef PMKh®Cocaxr M Pagel-T2' Discusses the impacts to the'peat bag'and pnsosed mitigation measures for same. Further comments are provided in the detailed section of the.DEIR related to this subject. Pagel-42 anri i-U i Mitigation measure provides'applicants for development shall participate in the existin„a [sic]Community Facilities District to fund site acquisition,and construction of and needed equip;nent for a new fire station,as well za ongoing operations and maintenance." Similar lartarrAge is presented for participation in CFD for police services Comments: Besides being overlybroad,no specific criteria establishing a linkage between the needed facilities etalis provided.Needed or not,nez-ds must be substantiated and go beyond a"wish list'appearance presented with broad generalities. The author of the DEIR should take a strongerposition vis a vis the city's"desires`and provide objective data to support any general and open ended mitigation measures Paget-5 Reference is made to the.Rancho Etiwanda Planned Unit Development Certified Final EIR (SCH#1BM209),dated March 1988. This section states in its second paragraph that°conditions of approval included the preservation of a peat bog and 92 awes of an unencumbered adjoining prominent knoll for a passive park" Comment: .We believe the above comment to be inaccurate and misleading, Examination of the project's EIR indicates that the boll site featured residential lots while the maps within the county's project approval documents contain land use legend indicating parts area. No where within either document are ilPistrations or language setting forth 92 acres' 'on the prominent-knoll for a passive par&° The fact is that the specific language contained in the EIR's mitigation measures on page 541 states: `The project pnponent shall provide at least 6.5 park acres an the project site or provide the County with funds,for future park areas in the vicinity of-the project site. The funds would represent the project proponeat's proportionate share of park acreage needed;to adequately serve the project site° This same language is reflected in the Statement of Overriding Consideration for the projects's EIR 8 'i Respom to E wspecificPlsymm Citpof RWKho iauar� A readi ng of th e ANA L SI S 8 section cr 1' ,the coon s following passage: tY's t this ier ojec Includes the Several segments or the Cucamonga Fault cross the site,and one segment has formed a peat bog at the northern boundary. The 1-3 million year-old bog is a unique feature of regional importance which will be donated to Chaffey College as an ecologcal preserve. TheprIeaerve wir7 be fenced,and sunmmded by a buffer of open space.• The proposed 453-unit Deveiopment:Plan will resul¢in an overall denys-it ,,of one unit per . acre. The applicant is requesting a 25%density bonus over the 363 base units petted by the General Plan. A 10%bonus is requested kir excellence of design,based on provision of 19 acres of improved open space,88 acres of natural open space,community equestrian and donation of the:bgg a:r an ec®iogical preserve.The improved open space area inclu _ at least . act which meet the City of Rancho Cucamonga's criteria for usable park land To say the,east,this passage differs somewhat in context from the nfozmatlon provided In the:DEIR Finally,receM plans submitted by landmark Land Company(Oak Summit Planned Development)present a superior alternative to park ail aa.upcI the lower elevations of this site area by reserving and preseavin nearly 250 aces of natural open space-much of fit upon the highest elevations existent in the specific plan era This altematitre would provide even greater view gotentlal and access to natural sun=&_,1g% It is.puzzling why the city has not recognized the positive aspects to this plan Page2-6 States"all of the aforementioned projects are presently within the unincorporated territory of San Bernardino County and are part of the County of San Bernardino General plan,West Valley subregianai planning Area(RSA 28)of the Rancho Cucamonga(sphere)planning area. They are also within the Sphere of Influence of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,and as such would utti nately be annexed under the ENSF as part of this development program and EIRpmeess,• As stated previously,we believe"a portion of the property held by Landmark land Companyis liot within the Sphere of Influence of the city.. Further,we object to annexation into the city bruts or sphere; 9 r. 4�spaQua to ENSP3�etifit F'F�IDEIR Citp1&W10CWMMP Number 3,of Section 3.5 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS provides forprezoning of unincorporated terntwy in the dVs sphere of influence as a prerequisite.`to annexation of that territory into the.si Comment: This action is an arbitrary attempt by the city to forcibly annex territory. As stated earner,landmark land Company objects to this come of action Page 4.1-? As stated previously,we are presently in objection to any annexation of territory lnto the city limits or sphere of influence of the city. Page 4.141 Discussion of Project Impacts in section t12 devotes considerable emphasis to the loss of open space. While this discussion is relevant and proper,the context of the discussion is slanted to the extent that little emphasis is given to the fact that the vast majority of this land is in private holdings and has had land use designations;allowing development for nearly twodecades. Page C143 It is stated that the City of Rancho Cucamonga proposes to annex a ,;oximately 5,155 aces "in conjunction with the approval'of the Etiwanda North Specific Fian." ;Comment: This proposal is forwarded by the`City of Rancho Cucamonga and notby,tNs property owner who objects to annexation into the city. ExbiTM U-5 �Ie The Circulation Plan should be revised to become consistent with County approvals(See Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development Circulation Plan)by aligning the northernmost north/south collector streets with Etiwanda and Hanley Avenues. Page 41-15/Extd6i U-b The description of and illustrations for the Open Space and Trails Plan indicates large areas within lands owned by landmark`land Company as set aside for Parks and/or community equestrian tralls i 10 >Citp to EPTSPSpecific P1ar�DEIR ofRsmho Caen en: The descriptions and dau±cticros indicated on the pages mentioned are unacceptable to Landmark land Company for the following reasnns: 1. The Community Equestrian Trails bisect property ;.ld by landmark land Company without regard or sensitivity to previously approved development plan or presently submitted development plans. These trails should,be realigned to fa within the utility easements present in the vicinity and should route equestrians northerly above and around property owned by landmark Landmark will assist local interests in traversing its property in such alignments which are presented on maps on file with the County of San Bernardino. Z Community Equestrian Trails in the vid*of private housing present objectionable risks to the health and safety of these residents and are clearly incompatible with approved and projected land uses. Such risks and/or impacts have not been addressed in this DEIR and should be 3. The scale of the CommunI4,Equestrian.Trails is unrealistic insofar as they would need to acquire land which is not offered for surd purposes. . The location of park areas on property owned by Landmark land Company is unacceptable. The City and author of the DEIR should consult with the County of San Bemard*.ho to examine the location of past areas in the project vicinity. The provision of public facilities in immm.ediate proximity to private`housing i5 unwarranted and presents a clearly incompatible land use relationship. 5. The'Bog Hydrology Study Area'is a misleading term;':.'d should not be reflected in an open spare and trails plan. - This section and the Exm'�ibit 4.1-6 should be revised to reflect these comments and suggested changes Exl4.l T This wdi t should be revised to remove the legends Indicates'' 'mFornia Sycamore/Southwestern Live Oak Revision��should be made coils,�.ent with approved land use plans and/orplans presently on Mein the County of San Bernardino. Pap&1-20 Under State of Czlifomia Relevant Planning Programs it is stated"imp _nentation of the proposed project would require the annexation ,.,pro dmately 5,155 a f nto the City of Rancho Cucamormga and 1,155 acres into the dVs Sphere of Influence. - �1 �RespMue to DISPSpeafic RaWDIIR -o &Taocummmp Comment Objection is made to any inclusion of properly owned by landmark land Company into either the cityiimifs or sphere of influence of the;city at this time. For the DEiR to provide accurate information on the subject i±alrouuld i; stated that the project is sponsor ed bythe city despite objections by localproperty owners, Fags 4.1:22, It is stated under the Sr yemardino National Foees#Land and Resource Management Plan that"the northern por.,on of the specific plan area lies within the boundaries of the national forest. No develop.m.-nt is proposed north of this boundary loge" Comment: This statement is Inaccurate. Landmark Land Company proposed to develop portions of the its property\Ahic,the national forest as a golf come. Fear golf holes will be present in this location This plan has been made available to the City of Ra';tcho Cucamonga for some time and is on file with the County of San Bemmxho. Page U124 Miffgation Meamm Nab Comment Ibis statementis misleading and inaccurate. It is impossible for the pr2jecttto be located within the citys equestrian overlay district since the project is not within the city }faits. The language should be revised As previously stated,no correlation,nexus,or relationship is presented either in the Specift Plan or DEIR substantiating the reason for citing 2g000 square foot lots as best forprovidin'1l a, minimum 25 acre equestrian facility. The author of the DER should address the mandatory'! nexus relationships to this issue using similar metthodoogy to that presented in the trafflc section ftV n_22 The local setting describes"the northwesterly portion of this area includes a sag pond in a mar.hv,irea`enerally north of a traver fng fault segment which has resulted in a peat bog condition' _QMmot The author should state whether the feature is or is not a peat bog'not whether the result of a traversing fault has resulted in a peat bog condition. It would be accurate to state that thei o is disagreement as to the origin and nature cl this 12 1 RnpanmetoENSPSpedfic RwVDEIR cityof&who C=ma a feature. Therefore,n Ahence to this condition should be rmifomdy accurate with statements describing the disagreement'Simply referring to the feat by a tenn which conjures up a certain image for the purposes of easy discussion is only perpetuates misinformation or myth Please refer to Pacific Southwest Biological Services report dated February 15,1990 wkclr disputes the origin of this feature as well as the description of a"Peat Bog` Pagc4[-4 Mitigation Measure No.B S�mment This measure is wholly out of context with the preceding measures insofar as it identifies a specific area,located on private property,to act as mitigation for an entire specific plan. This heavy exaction is further deficient in that it provides no mechanisrr:for_ acquisition. In so failing,no discussion is given to the land use plans sunoundrC l;-as area, nor is their discussion of alternative areas. This section should,at a minimum,be revised to provide such disc usslon A superior alternative would be explore areas affording greater views within closer proximity to nature and natural settings Placing the park in such close proximity to an area planned for private residences introduces impacts to the health and safety to those persons by exposure to noise,crime and trash as well as animal wastes associated with equestrian activities. Each of these impacts should be thof.5ughly evaluated within.the DER to a carfe5lanch decision of the nature provided in the current document The present�-,3ans for the area which are on file with the bounty of San Bemardino have landmark Land Company providing a 14.5 acre neighborhood pant southeasterly of this site. The Specific Dian and DEIR should be revised to show this design. A copy of this plaa was previously provided to the City of Ranrho Cucamonga. FhV4.3-i Onsite Soils-Sun9cial Units Comment The language in this section should Be revised to state*The project site is pwtalV within the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influencer. The Constraints map is inacp to and mistea f", a insofar as the area west of"the Bog-is not , , 18 ;. Response#o ENSPSpedfic Plsn}DEIR Citpof Rancho Cucamonga streamside woodland The knoll area is well above the Day Creek area and tales present appear to have been introduced by m an It is also premature to designate an area around`the Hog'as,a major recharge area when no studies have been e rformed to c�n9rtrr this. This p exhrbit should be revised to reflect I, accurate conditions E hffiit4.4-2 The Storm Drainage Master Plan is misleading insofar as a misleading and disproportionate area adjamnt to Day Creek Channel is coded as'a Regional Mainline Drainage Facilities area. Further,categorization of the llpper Etiwanda Il terrept.Channel as a"Secondary Regional 1 � is in due to the fact that no definitions or gradations for such facilities are -' d. These descriptions and illustrations thereby cast the area with featu: ',and facilities undefined This Exhibit is also inconsistent with B&tt 49(V which Acate surface water flows in the area Sources for this information should be given and the exhibik should be revised Page4.4-11 This first • h on paragraph this.page,in the third sentence,contains.the fallowing'The Cucamonga fault that denotes the baundarybetween these basins has affected local groundwater mov,-rents and may be responsible for maintaining the hydrology of the unique peat bog found in the northern portion of the tlmject site Cammmt These statements of opinion potentially have the of ce of coloring the average readers judgement. Objective analysis of this statement would provide tl;at the faulting indeed may not be responsible for maintaining the hydrology of the feature termed a'peat bog'. If this is the case then the feature may not be`unique, It is contended in some reports that the feature is not a peat bog but a mule fat and spike rush wetland that appears to have developed at the discharge point of a Cucamonga County Water District Pipeline. Please see the report by hcific Southwest Biological Services dated February t A 1990. More comprehensive and objective discussion should be provided throughout the report whenever discussion of this feature Is contained 7l 14 1 iesponse toE.'ITSPSpecificRa-P/DEIR testy of 138ncho Cucamonga Page4+5-3 li The second paragraph states"The 11=acre bog in the northwester on of the site is a 1� g 1 I' unique habitat within the San Gabriel Mountains. Preservation of this habitat and the hydrology supporting it is an important component of the.ENSP. Mitigation for potential indirect impacts on the peat bog include estatlishment of a minimurci 200-foot natural open space buffer surrounding the bog and preser%ation of all drainages important in maintaining the hydrology of the bog to the satisfaction of CDFG and ACOE, Comment: We again make the statement that language of this na.are is slanted with opinions a.3 refit r to the hereby incorporate the same comments provided in tht priding section We also find it highly curious why a 200-foot buffer is now suggested around"the.Bog'tvhen a 1Mfoot buffer was suggested in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Unit Developmen*Certified' Final EIR(SCH#8705204),dated March 1988 which,was prepared by the same consultant Preparing this DEIR The discussion and associated exhibits denoting a 200-mot buffer should be revised to be consistent with previous approvals while containing objective discussion as to the potential origins and naiure of this feature iPage4.53 The third paragraph states: 'Approval of the ENSP would result in the annexation of the ENSP area into the City of Rancho Cucamonga,after which tentative tract maps and/or grading permits would require the approval of the city." Comment: It is not true that approval of the ENSP would defaabresult in the annexation of the area into the city. The approval of the ENSP would serve as a revision to the existing city General Plan primarily. Whether this same matrix would subsequently act as a prezoning designation followed by annexation is unclear. In fact,the City has gone on record is stating that project gaining approval in the County will never be annexed into the City. As previously stated,Landmark land Company objects to its property being.annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga or its Sphere of Influence The language in this secton should be revised I dge 45-5 Table 45-1 should be revised to provide language other than`Peat Bog'. '.lease see our comments and justifications previously provided 15 y IZeg=a to ZNSP Specific F1&Y)/D) Cityaf Rarwho Ccamamp ExbM4.51 Delineation of the"Peat Bog should be revised to rrovicia objective language or deleted. Pag�S-;t1s12 � '?his section contains the followinglanguage., Accordin to dominant th the g b �' Cucamonga Fault has created a subterranean dam,behind which runoff firm Day Canyon organic washes collects..This resulting accumulation rue tlboon This.standing dinu 1 water, l o has also and of c subst='ate,is referrers to in this report p & been referrec=`.o as a sedgd3og(Karlin Marsh 1983,Planning Network 1985),I3ay0aseyanboc (des Lauriers 1981,1989),sagemarsh(County of San Bomar dino 1983),sedgqmat(soil specialist UC Riverside,County of San Bernardino 1983),peatbog(Trena Madre 1987,LSA Associates,Inc.1989),xciefieshwatermatsh(Vail Spec:Taylor 1989),and anmrialous muldat/spikerushwetland(Pacific Southvmst Biological Services 1990). [No matter what the nomenclature or origin of the bog all investigators agree thee.,this-wetland r3 an unusual and sensitive biological resource,worthy of preservation! Emphasis Added 7..,statement above(nixes opinion with fact tempered with a cont4taxii which is inaccurate. Further,the statement introduces that a"8ominant theory"exists,hnw wer It is not stated upon which empirical data suct ,theory h--L._,,,i established The most unusual, aspect this"unusual resource' s that a host e. fail to 3 on its on and sp experts agree flirt s'*.scripfion. Itis therefore difficult to believe that a dominant theory e:3sts at all. L stty,the conclusion v0hish this paragraph providers that"all,nvestigators agree that this we+land is an unusual and sensitive biological resource"is overstating the facts. Pacific Southwest Biological Services provides that the feature is"an artificial wetland,not a millennia old natural feats; Further,anriesponderee from the Cucamonga county Water District He the beginning of;he feature to the time when discharge began from a CCWD pipeline The author should provide all the facts within the.context of the discussion,not simply those facts which seemiiVy confirm his opinions. j P'ageO-13' The final sentence in the paragraph under Wildlift should be revised The'peat bog"is not a water source. The source of teas feahar a is in question Pagel5-1714IS-21 Rdhamcestothe"peatbog-on thesepages should becorrecied 16 rRmlc se to ENSPSpecificF1wO-rZIR citpef Rancho ouamonga PaV4 S-22 The conclusion that Wher areas such as the peat bog Would be functionally isolated from surrounding habitats after project irnpiementatlon"is incorrect Examination of the development plans previoualy p,.Aded by us to the City and currently on Me with the County of San Bernardino fllt& ate linkage of this araa to open spice areas. The DEIR should be revised to incorpirate this aspect:; FaV4+r-22 We believe the statement c&ntained within the fast paragraph under Diminishing Wildlife D-nsity and Diversity. "It is likely that the areas proposed to remain nawral within the specificplan area boundaries can antly suppo rt neat-maximun=pad ies of these species and cannot support the populations of raptors and mammals that would be.displaced if the specific plan was implemented."needs to be`substantiated further. Page4 S-23 The final paragraph contains the statement'Some'of the resources,such as the alluvial s=b habitat and.he peat bog,are important because they are uncomrnort and sensitive habitats.' Comment With respect to the`peat bog'previous discussion contained In this correspondence express ourvievs on this subject. This statema�it should be amended to provide a greater range of data. The first sentence on the following page(4.5-24)should reflect these changes as well. PagdLS-26 A4.5-27 Under the*R!at Bog'hea^:,.g n is'stated w1hepeat bog represents the only habitat of its type an the coastal side of the San Gabriel Mountains." Commen?_. This statement is highly svTect in the sense that the origin of thisl2eature has not been imconclusrvc y established. Rvher,this DEIR"Oes a description of the plant and animil spares found in this area,d which none are completely unique or endanged. It cannot be dearly stated then that other deviations or very similar occurrences of the- conditions found in this feature are not present elsewhere,or could not be artificially created. At the beginning of pzig�t 43-27 the DEIR calls for a minimum 100 foot bufi'ar surrotmding `the bog'on ail side. We would once again Ae to point out that ar+pmved plans as wei0 as a previous EIR prepared by thi consultant rave provided that a 100 foot buffer be prGv.ded 17 Response to ENSPSpedfic PlaYMER Qtpof Rsncho CumYn nga Our current plans provide 100 feet in accordance with these;plans: Further,the indirect impacts projected later in this section are questionable. For exarrp'.e. o "Invasive plant species introduced into the area by lardscapingas well as weedy species associates)with development and distu fired areas are likelyto become €,�ablished in the moist soil of the bog. The in roduction of these species would diminish the native character and diversity of the bog Comments This area is subject to high wt4,amcr+g the strongest found in the State of California. Air borne spores and other such species have every a porEunity tc.be invasive to this area. Fuftr ,ag,the final sentence of the statement above is totally contrad+ story. The fact that air tome elements hz-:re settled in this miare is the reason wby=it is'mique"and diverse. How this would,in the future,diminish the"native character'is a matter of opurion. o 'The soils,or peat,which provide the,substrate for the vegetation of the boghighly are ley sensitive to compaction and'other disturbances associated with human foot traffic, bicycles,and equestrian activity. This sort of activity is anticipated to increase if the area is not adequatelybuffered and protected! Comment It is a surprise to see the DEIR close the question on the nature of the soil in this areas by making a determination that it is`peat". We are unaware of any soils samples which have been taken since we have had no requests for access to this feature. Further, previous samples or studies attesting to this conclusion are not contained within the DEIR. The DEIR,shcruld this language be retained,should provide such data to substantiate these findings. Additionally,the disturbances cited in this sectica will be controlled by the land use and development plans provided by landmark land Company. Theseplans feature a 10 foot buffer as has been previously mentioned.The other activities cited will be prolubited. The conclusions reached pertaining to the damage of these activities appear to be logical but speculative.Accordingly,thevshould bepresenlied as such and not as object fact. o `The[subler anean hydrology]which currently supports the bog must be thonarrghly understood prior to Cdisturbances of the drain ges]north of the bog. If the hyd:`ology that supports the bog is interrupted,the[peat—' 'Is will dry outt the anaerobic . conditions that sustain the bog would no longer exists.and the[wetland plants] presertly occupying the tog would be replaced.by annual grasses and a Cher native and non native species:" 18 Resp=e to ENSP Spedfic P1ar/DER Citpof Rancho CUCWMP Comment: This connected set of sLppcdtions assumes a. That the hydrology which sup?orts,the bag is subterranean,despite evidence entered into the record to the contrary. Evidently the author has chosen to ignore or dismt,s this information Data and support for ` tabs action should be ofFered in this,section. However,since the same sentence says this aspect must be thoroughly understood(which evidentlyit is not)distzbances to the drainages should be avaided. We would argue that;since the sources are not understood by the author,the author should refrain from conclusions. b. That the hydrology to th&., ature has never been interrupted. Examination of this sRe during the recent 4=6t would have provided evidence that the area does in fact dry cut. The results which are projected in the DEIR have not been proven. c The soil is peat Please see our comments in this same section. Page4. 31 Mitigation measure No.19 should be rev4sed to indicate that a 100 foot buffer should surround`the bog'. Ti;a is consistent with previously approved and currently submified plans. Please see the Rancho Etiwanda Elr,Page 2-3. Pagd.73 SwroundinglUffisides Majeska,Peak is misspelled,the coned name is Modjeska Page42 4 The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model seems to use 13 as the RD f rate for single farnil residences. The DEIR should highlight those studies which were u..,aed to establish this criteria which is above the Institute of Traffic Engineers Manual of 10/CDT. 19 RegwmtoENSPSped icPIWDEIEt Cityof RM1eAo C+W-gig► This',rip rate,without the aforementioned studies as backup appears N. and would assess a dispi msortionate share of the costs burden to single family residences. Additionally, all-rhibits within the traffic section should be revised to becamm consistent with County approvals(See Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development Circu"ration Flan)by aligning the northernmost north/south collector streets with Etiwanda and Hanley Avenues. pages-3 The second paragraph states: As with development of the site under the City of Rancho Cucamonga's general plan'designations,this alternative may lead to fragmented development and inadequate infrastructure in the project area as the project would not be developed under a comp ehensive„spectfie playa! Comment:- This alternative r^ay'{=or may not-lead to fragmented development. The final paragraph states among other things"Additional onsite development would have more vehicular traffic(69,508 ADT for the proposed project and 61,W.ADT for 4,607 dwelling units plus commercial dt. elcpment),resulting in greater ainbient.air quality and noise impacts,as well as higher demands on public services and utilities." Comment: These statements assume that there will be advances in the technology of errd lions and noise control and assume that the higher demands an pu:�rjcservices Will not be matched by a commensurate share of financial contribution. Rom this approach,it is to see why the authors quickly con:sude that the County General Plan should be rejected from further consideration on page 54 71 Objections are made to the followingmitigation measw-es contained in this section. As these measures are a summation r--(those containing the same language in previous sections of the I DEIR,the expandeTa;tnme is contained in this correspondence.earlier are intended to be expressedagain 4.1 1AND USE-NWS 8}' 42 L:ANDFORM AND TOPOGRAPHY-'Na S 45 BIOLOGICALRESOURCES-No.15 0 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION-Ci#yoAde plexus Apportionment for Rtiwanda North Specific Plan 20 .. A Nspome to ENSFSpedfic?lar.DIIR _ C yof Rwxho CwAnxm&a APPENDICES 1. Please review again the letter from Pacific Southwest Biological Services indicated on Page10- 2 The Notice of Preparation incom ectly(apparently)states under PROJECE, appmxlmater�r 6,000 dwelling units. For the record,the undersigned represents property owned by Landmark Iand Company of , California,Ina The respective parcel numbers affected by this plan am as follows: 0225-Wl—ffi M25-051-15 0225-051-20 0225-051-21 M2"51-17; 0225-051-26 cam,V Truly Y + (chard P.Douglass landmark Land Company of California,Inc RPD/rpd !� cc Planning Commission Gwr etary-City of Rancho Cucamonga CttyClerk-City of Ranci_o Cucamonga planning Commission Chairman-City of Rancho Cucamonga Mayor Dennis Stout-0ty of Rancho Cucamonga John t9. Ohanian Mike Kee Supervisorlon Mikels =` Brad Bil ler I City of Rancho Cucamonga Valery Punier-County of San Bernardino/ Charles Fahe-County of San Bernardino Kathleen Browne-Count, of San Benaniino Curtis Aping-Michael Brandman Associates 21 DESIGN' GROUP YlanningjUfiG pe Arhitcctum June 26,1991 Mr.Larry Henderson,Senior Planner - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic.CenterDrive P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 .; RE: Response to City Etiwanda North Specific Plan7EIR. Job No.: NES 876.5 2- DearLarry: As you are aware,band Plan Design Group is preparing_the Etiwanda North Specific Plan within the County of San Bernardino. The comic ents that follow+are prepared from our perspective as hind planners familiar with the area. They are intended to be professional observations, not political statements. The EIR has admirable goals but is inaccurate in many of its statements,particularly as related to land use,biological rec-ources,parks and open space uses. It also does not address fiscal impacts which,when completed,could prove that the proposed development would be fiscally unsound.. and unworkable. r The City is currently revising its General Plan for this S�6cific Plan. The revisions to the General v Plan must justify the proposed changes as well a ilie•financial effects ofthe change; t The City has indicated it would like to annex the property, As you are aware a majority of landowners within Ettwanda North must vote in favor of an annexation in order for the annexation to occur. The City Staff report,which became available only last week includes many proposed Ji ch%.ges to the draft Specific Plan.Changes to land use designations within multiple ownersl;:--- f among,other important areas of the plan are,being recommended.If the City is desirous of an annexation,it would be appropriate to permit adequate time for the landpwneWvoters to t6ecome involved in a discussion of thew changes. The comments that f,5flow have been organized in the same format as Table I-1,page I-S of the summary text within the EIR LAND`USE The proposed plan would allow for the development of 3613 dwelling units on 6814 acres. This converts to an overall gross density of approximately one-half dwelling unit per acre,by far the, c, V 14751.Plaza Dnvn,Suits A.Tustin,Cabfomia 9�8SD,•(:t•)832-4,3f)D • FAX;(714)832 2Q25 �f ;. Mr.Larry Henderson y Job No-: ?.TES 876.5 o ae June 26, 1991 Page 2 :'4 Lowest density of any large project currently approved or under consideration by the City. Even with th',low density,the EIR proposes preservation and/or acquisition of 4112 aeees or nearly 60%of the total land area within the project boundaries. Whist it is a laudable goat to t`-y to obtain and preserve open space for the City,it cannot be accomplished without some mecltnism'for Public acquisition of the large parcels of privatelyowned property within the preservation areas. It cannot be accomplished simply through the imposition of conditions of approval which require mitigation far in exms^ of the impacts of development: Preservation of Ooen Space: The EIR attempts to justify the proposed'�resemation"of 4112 acres of land onus-n,grounds: (1)-as mitigation for the claimed loss of"open space"and(2)as mitigation for the' depletion of regional wildlife and hau tats." Neither of these two asserted impacts justifies the proposed requirement that nearly 60%of the total land area in the Spec fic Plan be preserved. 5 t First,the EIR erroneously classifies all of the undeveloped property within the Specific Plan as "open spaced despite its designation as residential on the Citys General Plan. Under Section( 65560 of the California Government:Code, "open space land"is defrncl exclusively as an`' unimproved parcel which is"devoted to an open-space use as defined in this section,and which is designated on a local,regional or state open-space plan"as open space for one of four limited purposes, In this case,the City and County General Planshave both shown most of the property within the Spe-Lifrc Plan as suitable and intended for residential development for more than 10 years. It is imprrper to identify the entire area.as an"existing open space land use"for:he purpose of evaluating project impacts. Second,the EIR both overstates the irnp,cts of the residential deve!o ment.an P d proposes to require grossly excessive mitigations. Foils sk'nce,the EIR states that if isnecessa "necessary to preserve is 11 perpetuity 4112 acres in Day Creek and San Sevaine"as mitigation fbi'development of the residential areas. The EIR further states that"development regulations that preclude development in San Sevaine,Etiwanda and Day Creek,and other open space areas shall be adopted." As noted above,the bulk of the proposed residential development wiIII not occur in areas which meet the statutory definition of"open space land." Further,there is no factual basis for requiring the developer of land designated as-residential to acquire or otherwise provide for the"perpetual" preservation of more than 1-14iimes the areaproposed to be developed. This requirement is Obviously-nothing more than a predetermined"toll"which the City intends to impose on future residential development, regardless of the actual environmental impact or any"nexus"to the proposel condition of approval. In addition, the City fails to identify the,"other open space:zreay" which are proposed for preservation or to consider an equitable financing mechanism for acquisition of privately owned property such as San Sevaine Creek or those portions of Day and Etiwanda Creeks which the San Bernardino County Flood Control District may deem eligible for development. Hilieide Residential Land Use: :!ie Specific Plan identifies a combination hillside Residential= HR(up to 2 dwelling units per acre)and Hillside Residential Estate-HRE(up to I dwelling unit per acre) land uses above the LADWP right-of-way corridor. The current City Staff report recommends that the IiR land uses be changed to HRE uses east of Etiwanda Creek,stating this is "closer to the designation of the County General flan." - t, E }� Mr.Larry Henderson Job No.: NES 876.5 ` June 26,1991 Page 3 It is reasonable to consider an allowance of 1 dwelling unit per gross acry for these areas. However,it"3 incorrect to state that this is"closer to the County General Plan." The County, General Plan permits 1 unit per acre over the entire site,the City proposal is basedupon;"net buildable acres"and would generally reduce the allowable dwellings far below the County,by 50%or more. If the revised designation by staff is accepted and densities are further reduced,will4fie,`'rty revise „ the EIR and various technical studies and mitigations to reflect reductions in4rafft:ai 4'nther related impacts both on and off-site? Developments West of Day Creek Wash Levee: The staff report recommends elimination of residential use west ofthe Day Greek Ievee. Should this change occur,areduction of244 dwelling units would result to the Specific Plan and in-turn,a reduction in traffic and other related impacts on and off-site. This would impact the mitigations proposed throughout the,Specific Plan and EIR. These corrections should be made prior'to City Council review and approval. \� Hillside Development Ordirdnce:. In previous correspondence we have identified"'eternal conflicts within the City of Ranchn CucamongaHii!side Development Ordinance which,-dderit incapable of beingproperlyimpiLmented. Theproposed Land Use mitigation which incorporates the Hillside Development Ordinance is therefore subject to this objection. Quimby Act Requirements- The project will be"required"to provide a total of 62 acres of park land or 5 acres per WOO population. The City currently requires 3 acres ofpark per 1000 residents in accordance with the Quhuby Act. City Staff has proposed a"recalculated":requirement of 4.69 acres per 1000 population based on a"new"City study. We have received no documentation in support of the higher requirement,despite numerous requests. City Staff has also filed to indicate whether the higher requirement will be adopted by the City Coi0cil as a City--wide requirement. Also,if the total dwelling units is reduced based on staffs recommendations on the Hillside areas and areas west of Day Creek levee,the total park acres requirement should,be revised. COMMERCIAL LAND USE LOCATIONS: With iegard to the City's location of commercial uses at the intersection of Route 30 and Day Creek Blvd.,The City has previously rejected a similar proposal at Milliken Avenue and Route 30. On the grounds of access from Milliken and inconsistency with the City General'Plan. This proposal would appear to have many of the same problems. Also,the proposed location of the c i, it areas along the freeway instead of internal to the community seems to go against a Cr,.m.' :sof creating'Hubs"at major city intersections. The location of the commercial site at Sum ._t;x3anyan,across from the park and school sites seems to be more consistent with the Hub concept.;This Hub site-]so would reduce,rather than encourage, traffic through Vintage Drive within the VintageHighlands immunity. A second commercial site is shown on Wilson Avenue,?long Wardman Bullock Road(on Flood C orarol District Property). This location seems to be it'conflict with City Policy'tdr minimum spacing between com„lercial centers as noted in the Etiwanda'Specifrc Plan(Section 3.52 and 3.3.100). The Edwanda Specific Plan currently identif es;a commercial site only one half mile from this site. ' J aim Mr.Larry Henuerson Job No.: 11TS 876.3 «- June 26, 1991 Page 4 " EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DI�1CT• r- ]Equestrian Issues: The land use section also indicates the project falls within the City's equestrian overlay district. The mitigation for lots less that 20,000 square feet requires landownei7(developers .contribute to"a minimum 25 acre equestrian site and equestrian boardinZ facilities".=It is our understanding that the equestrian overlay district is identified within.current City boundaries and does not extend to the Troject area.However, even if the overlay urea VJ cover the project area, it would be inequitable to require this project alone participate in the 25 acre facility. Other areas such as the Etiwanda Specific Plan south of the project have equestrian overlay designations with lots less than 20,000 square feet,yet are not required to contribute to this facility. If the City is requiring a 25 acre equestrian facility,it must prepare an equitable solution City-wide, BI LLOGICALRESOURCES In addition to the general requirement that 4112 acres of the Speci,is Plan be preserved"in perpetuity,".the EIR specifically identifies approximately 2972 acres of mitigation which r<iust be provided by the"applicants for development." The following is a summary of mitigation and associated acres that are requited to be fulfilled by the"applicants for development". r1 E1LY R EQD 1. ..."Preserve mountainous openspace within the San Bernardino 915 National Forest(includes 365 acres in upperDay Creek and 239 s acres in upperEtiwanda Canyon." 2. ..."Preserve the steep slopes,chaparral, riparian-corridors,and +750* wildlife habitat in the hillsides adjoiningtheNational Forest',, (*The total acres are not identified in the EIR,our estimate is+750 acK ) 3. "Preserv:191,acres ofNaiural Open Space,riparian corridors, 191 and wildlife habitat within San Sevaine Wash". 4. ..:`Preserve 270 saes of Natural Open Space,riparian corridors, 270 and�Aldlife habitat within Etiwanda Wash,north of Wilson": 5. ...`Preserve Natural Open Space,walnut woodland,riparian +6 corridors and wildlife habitat below Wilson(100'width minimum) to facilitate the movement ofsmallmammais. (Note: This is an off- site requirement)". f C1 r >7- J Mr.Larry Henderson Yob No.: NES 876.5 June26, 1991Page 5 6. "Preserve 700 acres of natural open space and wildlife habitat in 700 Day Creek Wash and spreading grounds,including the 200 acres' set aside as a mitigation area for the Dail, k WaterRroject". I 7. re Detain 140 acres op�p�b habitat as�dev_glop.�d and shall 40 restore acres of n Total c A res The EIR attem;,i.,u justifj thi-Aarge amount of mitigation by claiming that the project will(a) remove 2500 a ,'es of"natural`cgen space, diminish on-site wildlife density and diversity, fr"gment the remaining hf6itats ait3 i.Rterrupt wildlife habitats on the project site;(b)remove approximately 1900 acres of alluvial fan scrub in Etiwanda,Day Creek and San Sevaine flood plains;and W cause the loss of 3 acres of riparian woodland. All of these impacts are overstated in the EIR and the proposeL7�litigation far exceeds any"nexus-based"requirements. "Natural Op en�' -ice"Remo�Z Ai'wted above,the Etiwanda North Development does not meet the statutory'iefinittoa sV"open spaca land"and is not so identified on the City or County General Plans. it rs self-evident that all first-tierce development converts undeveloped land.to a developed condition. This does not constit•,te a"loss-of open space"whC�n it is cgwistent with the City's existing General Flan. We also note t r at the City has never previously'reguired mitigation from nriy other project on the basis of open'spaee displacement. Is the City intending to require miti tion of all land convert(d fn?n undeveloped to developed condition City-wide? Alluvial Fan Scrub: It is erroneous to attrihte the loss of I900 acres of alluvial fan scrub to this project. Significant losses of alluvial fai;`scnrb within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan are demonstrably the result of the bay Creek,Water Pro iect,which has already mitigated for all habitat " losses within the Day Creek'Watershed oi-approxuitately 2500 acres within the project boundaries. This mitigation was,found to be adequate through the CEQA review process for the entire Day Creek System. - Simflar to Day Creek,'.he Etiwanda Creek project is responsible for most of the remaining impacts on alluvial fan scrub habitat due to its eoncentrafgn of flood flows away ftsm areas previously subject to flooding and into levees and channels.'e ven.without the Etiwanda North Spm. fic Plan, impacts on the improvements care required to protect existing housing within downstream flood areas within the City of Rancho Cum:conga.;it is unlawful to reWire development to mitigate new devel for imnac ss caused by a flood control program larg4ly des!Lzaed to ir';-rt existing residents. ti RIPARIAN WQM�'LAND The EIR lists a tctal of 3 acres of impacted riparian habitat. It nonetheless prop�ses that the applicants bolt} restore the impacted acres and"retsm 140 acres of riparian habitat." If the habitat is restored,there is no possibic justification for'reviring a permanent set-Heide of an urea nearly 50 times as large for additional"mitigation.." I,t' % i5 y Fo Mr.Larry Henderson } No.: NE5;Z?6.5 June 26,.1991 t aage 6 TRAFFIC/CIRCULATION The City Traffic Model has been a useful tool to evaluate the City-wide traffic needs and mitigations. It should be noted the impacts created byEtiwanda North contribute a-small fraction of the off-site impacts to the City circulation system. The statement that"im lemenC'ion of mitigation measures would mitigate project-specific and the projects contributio,t o tmfiic impacts to a level less than significant except at Daytreek/Baseline,Milliken/Foothill,Rochesterroothill and Day Creek/Foothill",should be clarified to indicate that the Etiwanda Norff-incremental addition to the total traffic of each intersection is generally 2%to 3%. If the City reduces the total project dwelling units as recommended in�the Stafl report this number would be less. AIR QUALTIY The mitigation states that"future applicants for development shall establish a Transportation Management Association(TMA) to coordinate and implement a transportation management program to reduce employee vehicle trips". The controlling entity for this effor-in the County is _ SAlsBAC. Does this condition match this controlling agency's requirements? Another condition requires residential units"not be constructed within 600 feet of the operations of the Day Creek Sand&GravelMine...." The Gravel Mine is not shown in the City land use plan and has not been discussed elsewhere in the EIR i.e.,traffic section,etc. How is this issue being addressed throughout the EIR? NOISE The mitiga,;<.,t measures for proposed projects seems highly unusual compared to standards applied to current and proposed City projects. For example,the mitigation mi:asure requires t perimeter walls varying 140'to 178'feet from the centerline of Wilson Avenue between Milliken and Cherry Avenue. In effect,this creates,a right-of-way area of 280'to 356''about 4 times the standard 80'to 100'right-of-way? Is the Cityplanning this same approach City-wide? i LID WASTE As mitigation for impacts on solid waste,the'�q`(R states that"the applicants for development shall implement a separation and recycling program;o decrease the amount ofpotentidgeneration of solid waste." It might be appropriate to requi&,2'1 new development,including the Etiwanda North S-3r,-,fic Plan, to participate. through funding and passible one-time construction requirerr - .in a up h1k waste-separation and recycling program. It is wholly inappropriate to regr,ire attour of individual private property, wners to establish,at their own expense,a solid w -reduce`,,i program without any assurar. `s that the.City will cooperate or even make it possible to.' Jement. Without the particir A6n of the City and other projects,it would be impossible, the Etiwanda North Spec4frc'i: in to take advantage of the economies of scale'' availaVw:tr 2UJAic solid waste management program-i or to ensure the effectiveness of the, Program,.' ( ',) Mr. fllmyHendersoq Job ldo.; NES 876.5 l; Jane 26,r1991 Page 7 Ia reclar�i2ie . .. = PP opportunity to comment on the project. Please feel flee to call should I be able to linswerany questions youmay have: Vcryttulyyours. r Jess Hams Principal JH:Iw :r cc: Joe Worio C J Corr chron f K (� CITY OF RANCHO"CUCAMONC-A STAFF REP(.)RT i DATE.• June 26, 1991 I TO: Chairman an&Mpnbers of the Planning Commission, FROM: Brad Buller,-C"t 1f Planner- BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez,,,,Assistant'Planner SUBJECT: " ENVIRONMENTAL Ai'SESSMENT AND M6dIFIC'.TION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-06 - RICHARD STENPO:I Modification of conditions of approval to allow land uses requir1mg a more intensive parking ratio }lean the one provided for research and development (i space1per 350 square feet) within an existiVg industrial complex on 13.7 acres ,of land in the General Industrial District`i\(subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific P1anr-\locate'1 on the northwest corner of '' Buffalo and' 6th _,rest•' \APN: 229-261•-78. Staff recommends issuance of a Nega'Aive Decllavation- (Continued from Juno 12`-1991.) `3l I. 'PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: . A. Action Reguected: Approval of _a modif;.ca-ton to .toning Commission Resolution No. 85�78, for Condi*team. U;:e Per it 86-06, t6 allow far more intensive use;-\than, Research and B. Swrounding Land.Use and zoninal 4 .✓ North - Warehousr,_•;Distribution rbuildingj Ger_;lral Indiustriax Oubarea 10) South - Industrial and c vacant; General Industrial (Subarea'11) Industrial knacifi.c Plan East - Industrialp (Subarea '13) Industrial Specific, Plan West - Industrial; (Subarea 11) Industrial Specific Plan C. General Plan Designatior0: Project Site - Geelaral Industrial North General Industrial South - General Industrial East General Industrial" West General Industrial Ins E J PLANNING COPLMISSION STAFF REPORT CDP ab, 06 - RICZAR6 STENTON June 26, 1991, Page 2 7 n 1 _ I.I. ANALYSIS Conditional Use Permit 86-06 was approved by the Planning Commission on June '11, 1986. The three industrial r; buildings were designed fon' a Research and Development/Office type of use totaling 237,057 square feet and parked accordingly. r ? condition was placed on the project, lu ting prospective tenants to those General Industrial uses identified for Subarea 11'of the Industrial Specific' Plan, .not to exceed a -par'.cing ratio of 1 parking space per 350 squa_�!, feet (the,parhinig requirement for the Rtaearch and :Development usa). The condition reads: as follows: "E.: _The applicant and their leasing ..agent 'shall disclose to"_�any prospective tenant, in a written format to the satisfaction of'tne City Flannery the fallowing limitations of this permit: - r X A. Buildings 1, 2, and 3 ::are intended for. :research ant?' Development/Office; use and parking provided accordingly at a ratio of t s3,page per 350 square feet.' Further: no use in t1hese three buildings will be t,ermitted which requires parking at a more- intensive ratio'''Y an that provided. B. No use,(+will t. permiited unless'allowed by Subarea 11 of''the Industrial Specific Plan." This condition was deemed appropriate to 4*-rt potential tenants that the -:ae of these buildings was 1lmited to Research: and / Development type users or.'those uses which require',less parkins. This type of "awareness" condition i3. for-the' •benefir- of future tenants and is redundant because it 3imply repeats. City regulations. There has been littleh market interest in Research and. Development 'spacer hence, the project has been vacant. The applicant has beer exploring other uses, such as tis indoor-mall (see 'related file Conditional Use Permit`91-63)0 Essentially, the applicant is requesting deletion off -condition No. 6, in its entirety, to allow-considerution of o :uses. II. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, The Planning Commission issued a Negative Declaratl:n on June 11, 1986. The modification ,of a condition of approval is not a "pro,tet" as defired Ly State la ;tip i hence, this item is exempt from CEW requirements. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item hasbestn advertised in the Inland 1 Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper as a'public hearing, the property, was posted, and wet tees were sent to all property offers within 300 feet of tf,:e gs:'pject site. t ` PLIiSJ[tsi� Comm 1-Qk.--)H,'S'SAFF ris�dgRT'' - n / OW86-06 RICH STENTON L Jitne 26, 1991 Pa E 31 V. RECOMMENDATION S�� ff rec,Si en4s thoub g n the ilannin Commissio , r ' �+',rrve the ,7.adificatio:t`'to Conditional jtEe Permit 86-06 deleting Condition No.' 6 through 'adoption ,of tie q`x�'hed Resolt�-ion of Approval.. � v +, z, Respec submi f Brad DL cr City tianner BB ALH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit'"A" Tocation'Hap i Exhibit "B" - Detaiied Site tilam v 1 ZxWlbit "GII `- :elevations., 4 Exhibit �'D" - Letter'from Applicant ; Exhibit "S" -''Resolution 9b-78 ResoluLIeTI of Approval f 0 x' =? yi ' .c i PIER I , W f DDYFA i KDOVRBA f LL - -- '1® f r �:�Ij EXiS 7P1�i �� ''! �t�^' r�+r�s}�4��y�• �r E1d3TG0 co INDU9. i sit pROPQ ED f ,T. oRAss l 81e1IXN0 F.. r, f- r P .� PROJECT ` cERal AM SIXTH --:BTREE7 1_J 1 ' VINEYARDS r 'VINEYARDS. 'I LT � � zz IL i 2 rA �r I, CI7N OF 1T v+b ` M.,E= fo`fc.r Pam'°�o1ING DINMON XHIBTIC� SC�I.Irr�i�s I � ••tl flaNl�IIVI 3Atl N3AYN / - I 6 r•' W 3AT OryeIH-7..;1 �LP o a r I m..l� 1 = y N X rJ 0 hN ro � K ri A r ��� ,�;� SSL t5 LL,. � r O° I.IY .11: SZ652 1: j , E 5 2 W L t�IJ AWL �� Rg Rif Q 4' w A. dz° i ®ow W j IF w FF 12 AdIlk MR r - � o 'I ;L W AR WS mass v Qn at �l 1' l' J E-7 J } 8@ ©il w �� M U j r 4 ra I f lid is u r 60 BCCC RE Ila- 3 � m� ps w o x �o � m M z � z LLL A I a X U 1 � F o .b r o � L _ 9 .l` V AilJ 'Fr ' 1 a 9 "ii C y{ Y R�,^< i r _'t r�\cS:; i •~SC r ,` k�, � �yJ� i Mzr,ch 5,: _991 „ City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Canter Drive Rancho CucamoRg&, GA 91730 RE: :EPUEST POR MODIFICATTON�TO.C.U.P.. $6--06 (ATTACHED) PURSUANT TO C.U.P. APPLICATIO-N 9J-02 AND GENERAL PLAN AXE1.D 4ENT 91-01 To whom 7t may capcern: r 4 The purpose for this modification is to allow for the of existing parking to provide' adequate,'parking for the proposed "r'ini-mall" pursuant to those conditions stated in General ?Ian amendment 91-01 and C.U.P. 9,1-02. This site has an approximate gross floor area of 203,363 square feet and existing parking of 771 spaces. The recordation of parcel map 12338 in December---of 1990 was predicted on the recordation of :C,C, & R's that providit?" .Ror non-exelus ve use of all of the parking (see page 13' of C,C, &, R's attached). Pursuant to the restrictions of C.C.P. 91-02,and:the restrictions of the lease agreement, the operation of the "mini-mall" in approximately 103,552 square feet of gross floor area would be limited to the following schedule: Monday through Thursday: ,re-stocking of inventory by vendors; Friday afteraoon through evening: open to the public; Saturday and: S1Inday: open to the public.' , The definition of use under General Plan Amendment 91-01 along with : the and reatrietions of"C.13.P: 91-02 will clearly control the requirements general opetating hours of Chis ape a:ton. Thar-'-)re, the-request foz°modification is specificalr fo.r:S.ection 3, Para. ph 6, iUb-pa-ragraph` A of Resolution 86-y8 to ,..11ow uses'In any one 6U the three buildings that may require a parking ratio higher than 1 space per 350 equare feet, with t6'e .site 'average on a day b_v r t, } \S a fti day basis iiototo exceed a. ratio of l) space per iM square zed_ as controlled and restricted through the C.U.P. pt� cess, a �] `It is3I-the owners belief that , tp a of approve would still restrict the site as a who pursuant to the iu `-�rit9,ons of the City, while providing for the opera-iiol, of compatible uses with u�f—setting, parking need. l Your cor':ideratioi.,of this matter is greatly appreciated. 1p r. SinceY ely, � ii David Noon ' 499 1\ 's= '' � e f RESOLUTION NO. 86-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE kANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE 'PERMIT,-,,NO, 86-06 FOR THREE RESEARCH AND VEVELOPMENT/QFFICE BUI DINGS LOCATED AT THE ' NORTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH S1EET AND BOUALO AVENJE IN' THE GENERAL, INDUSTR JoL-OISTRICT-t ,I WHEREAS on the 21s#, da _of' May, 1986 a complete a l,cation was ' Y,' Y, , P PP I filed ay Gilbert Aja-& Associates 'for review of thy.above-described project" ' and WHEREAS, on the, llth day:of June, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho..Cue<amonga Plvnning Commission'rgs,olved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That tha proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions RJ applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or mat6�-Wly injurious to properties or imprpvements ii\ the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. SEUION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the _ environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on June 11, 1986. ' SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 86-06 is approved subject to the following Conditions and attached Standard Conditions, Planning Divisions 1, Additional pedestrian facilities such as pirni, tables and hardscape shall be provided to the plaza area. Deteif design of the plaza area shall be subject to Design Review Coaniitee review and approval prior to issuance of building peria;'r- i \ _ �2. The proposed triangular shaped skylight is too small a scale compared to the building entrance statement. The applicant shall either„ enlarge the skylight` or provide other architectural elements to accentuate it, or eliminat the skylight feature. COMMISSIO SOLUTIOiJ iJ�4 Cj? 36-06 - AJA 11, 1986 Page 2 I �• �. Milk 3. Te.turized pavement acrrss circulation aisle or within p;'iza area shall be of brick pavers or other materials subject to Cft\ Planner- approval. Full samples shall be submitted to Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits: 4. Additional, six foot wide landsr.ape planters shall be provided to-the north elevation of Building 1 and Building 2, and west elevation of Building 2. 5. The proposed four handicap distributed. spaces for ��;ildng 3 shall be evenly i0 6. The applicant and their leasing agent shall disclose to any prospectiv '.'tenant, in a written format to the satisfaction of the City Planner, whe following limitations of this permit; A. Buildings 1, 2 and 3 are intended for Research and Development/Office use 'and parking provided accordingly at a ratio of 1 space per;350 square fe t e her no use in th ese three (3)`"builrlin s Will. F•urtW.'iermitted W_':ci; requires"parking at a more intensive raaJo than that provided. -' B. No use wilt 'be permitted unless aliowe9 'by Subarea 11 of the Industrial Specific Plan. 7. Any revision or modificai;ion to this Conditional Use Permit �h3iT require application for said change ana review and approval by the Planning Commission as prescribed by the ri'ty's Development Code. Enoineerina Division: 1. All pertinent conditions of Parcel Map 9670 shall "apply.•. 3, APPROVED AND ADOPTED Tf,!S 11Tti DAY OF JUH, 1986. PLANN OMMISSION OF TliE CITY Of, kk(CHO CUCAMONGA BY Al Dennis L. out, Chai an ATTEST- _'�41 '. Brad Buller;- eputy Secretary �� 1 RESOLUTION NQ. $6=7$A --> A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF R",-mo CUCAMONGA, CAMLIFORKIM, APPRC:VING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE 1tdUIT NO. e6=06 TO ALLOW FOR MORE INTENSIVE USES THAN RESEARCH AND DEVEZOPMENT LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL :D1ST=T (S17HAVMA 10) OF TfiE' - INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MMING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-261.-78. A. Recitals. (1) Richard ,Stenxon has ,fi3i�d an appliCit-i6n for tho :issuance of a modification to conditional, Use permit No. '86-(fi as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinaf:g n this Resolution, the subject Conditional UHe Permit request is referred,,to as "the application." (ii) on the 26th of •June 1991, the-Planning commission of the =A`Ly of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hogging on the application and Concluded said heaz'tng on that dst6-'� (III) Or. the filth day of June 1586, tha Planning Ccwmiaisicn adopted Its Reeolut=on No. 86-78, rorditionally approving '- Conditional Use Perni.it 46-0e:. - (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resclutia have occurred. ;1 NOW, THERM'7RB; it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the PlanningCommission it ti:e City of'Rancho Cucamonga rr"�011ewx - 1. This Commission hereby "cifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recxtals, Part A, of thin-Resolution as'c true and correct. c 2. Based upon substantial evidence p•;:ss ,t, to this commission during the above-referenced gublic'riesxinq an .Toss-fx 391, including written and oral staff reports, together with pubJli icesS imoi yu't,hin Commission hereby. upecifica.11y finds an follows: (e) Inc applicatia-i appl1e5 to prop; ty louated At .11530 Sixth Street wsith a street frontage of 71SciS feet,wad icy depth bf 593.83 teat and is presently improved with three Research and Dnv ,iopment buiidirgn; and (uj The property to the north, south, east, and. '`,est Caneral Induecr;al. , . (o)" The application proposes th_ .deletion of Planning Division Conditioi\ No. 6 from Resolution No. 36 78. j w �f s Q7Q 0 ,UN,E 9� , P. .t .AG DA ZG PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 110. " ("UP 86-06 - RrCiAIRD'STENTON June 26,,1991 Page 2 � j 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and uppn the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1�'an3 2 above, this-Commission hereby,finds and concludes as follows:' (a) That the proposed.use is in accord with the General Plan,, the objectives of the Development' Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. ' (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions' applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.'` (o} Th>t the proposed use comp`,`•.ies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finda and certifies that the proposed deletion ox a condinion is not a ."project" as defined by State 'law, and further, that a Negativo Declaration was previously issued for Conditional Use, Permit 86-06 on June 11, 1986 i 5. Based upon the.findings and conclusions set fzrth-ir. paragraphs 1, 2, 3, -an.2 4 above, this Commission hereby deletes Planning Division Coadition No. 6, in its entirety, from Resolution No. SG-- , 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall cextzfy to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND_ADOPTED THIS 26Ta DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR 0 �1 BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho -Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resclutior,� was duly and regularly_introduced, passed, and adopted by the t:`lanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day* of Jutie 1991, by the following vo::e�,to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSa CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AF rr DATE: June 26, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members o; the Planning Commission FROM: 'Brad Buller, City'Plannex/t BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONVrTI6NAL USE HERMIT 91-63 �' l - ,JAMES PAGE - The request:, to establish an Indoor - whelesale/RetRil Commercial use in a leased; space of , 103,552 square feet within an existing indastr);al center ((( on 13.77 acres of land in the General Industri:,al+Jistrict, (Subarea 11)`of the indVatrial Area Specific Plan, located at 11530 Sixth Street -�,>PNw 229-026-28. Staff recovmenao, issuance of a .Negative Declaration. ° Related file Modification to Conditional Use Permit 86-,06. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION; A. Action Reguested:, A9proval t.Z' non-construction Conditional Use Permit 91-03 to allow` an ,Indoor Wholesale/Retail _ Coo ercial use within an existing research and development industrial center, located at 115$0 Sixth Street, and issuance of a Negaive Declaration. tI B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning.-,,-.,', North - Warehouse/Distribution Buildings General 'Industrial ;(Subarea 10, Industrial Specific Plea), South Industrial and vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 1i Industrial specific Plan and Industrial Park# and Subarea "12, Industrial Specific Plan) East - Industrial (Subarea 13, Industrial Specific Plan) West - _Industrial (Subarea 11, Industrial Specific Plan) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General industrial North — General Industrial j South General industrial and Industrial Park . Eask - General Industrial West General Industrial r` v i I p f ITEM F r - PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-03 - FAMES PAGE June 26, '1991 Page 2 D.. Site Characteristics: The site is currently, developed with Three Raseai `:-ziad Development /Office Use buildings totaling:.. 203,36,5 squa ..'feet. ` {` E. Parking Calculat16ns: See attached L>r,_;:bit "G." II. ANALYSIS:' A. Background: On May 8, 1991, the Planning Commission reviewed j and,'approved 'industrial Specific Plan :Amendment 91-031 withl modifications, to :allow the'Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial use within Subareas 8, 91 100 11, . 13 14,' and 15 .of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The amendment, scheduled for City Council review on June 1'3, '1991,` was, initiated by the City in response to inquiries by several potcntiai users. The. Commission also approved the associated development criteria for the use. In addition to Conditional Use Pt Alt 91-03, ' related file Conditional Use Permit 86-06 is .L o 'before the Planning_ Commission. The owners have ', - `L for a :modification to Conditional Use Permit 86-06 tc aalow for more intensive parking uses than that of Research and Development, as ' originally approved. Approval or.,"Conditional Use Pei'!mit 91-03 is contingent upon approval: of these other two items. B. General:_ James Page is proposing to occupy�103,552 square i feet for an Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial ,use (see' Exhibit "A")' The applicant is proposing,,'• to have approximately`200 permanent indoor stalls, averaging about 300 square feet .per stall. The use will feature an interior rest area for passive activities such as television viewing (See Exhibit "B" and "C"). All vendors will maintain the same hours of operation. The proposed`.hours of operation. for the facility are: ` Monday` through' Priday - 10:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. (Incidental , stacking of merchandise for vendors and office hours for the management team - not open 'to the public.) " p Friday - 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. - Retail Sales Saturday - 10;00 a.m. - 8:00,.p.m. Retail ,Sales. Sunday,- 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.. - Retail Sales 1Z, In addition, the applicant has provided a management plan which gives an overtiew of the project's concept, and outlines personnel, security and maintenance issuea (see'Exh::biL if PLWINC COMMISSION STAFF-REPORT CUP-91-03 - JAMES PAGE s June 26, 1991 Page 3 A yariety< 4f new merchai4dise will be sold by a number ci independent sellers. ''Clothing, jewelry, cosmetics, toys, etc. are typical kinds of goods to' be sold. The applicant is proposing to maintain,a manageuent team of six to ten persons during hours of operation for, the retail ? use, from Friday' to Sunday. when retail activity wili. take place. On weekdayt�,,approximately two to three "managers" will be on-site to ensui'g,_proper facility-maintenance and service for vendors: In ad&tion to a management team, two-to four security f.personnel will -be provided, 'for 24-h6ur/day, 7-day/week patrol_ of, the facility. Finally, two to`four maintenance personnel will ne 'provided to-pick Up trash and di.,Pct traffic during peak operating hours. t C. Issues: The prt_wry issues related to the proposed Indoor Wholesale/Retailer;. Commercial use are compatibility with surrounding lan4 3.aes, parking.:•and aesthetics 1. Compatibility a -Surrounding Land Uses: L��rently, only 17 percent of the",ntire center is leased. jThe existing teri,At i� nayai Rattan, a light wholesale andf{ he of rattan furnit*.xa -roducts. Regal Ratt,aii maintains typical heirs of operation fox. indsstriah users, :from 7:0 -iZ.4 to 5:00,p.m.,-Monday through Friday. This proposal contemplates the use, of Building 1 ' (see Attached Exhibit "A"), for retali use. Buildings 2A°and 2B:"as indicated by the owner,,. is 'intended for light industrial "uses such - as` tight Manufacturing and Wholeuale, Sturage, and `Aiit-ibution. The a,ier has indicated that,Builling 3 may-me proposed for office use in the future: (The propose$ office use for Buii�'Ung 3 within the center will be p=ocEssed by the :owner at a 1„ter date and "is not part of this review process.) Because the Indoor. Wholesale/Retail use proposes only to operate during typical off-peak hours for the canter, staff anticipates no significant compatibility pxobleas with current and future users: Zacillary retail uses have begz,"" permitted within General 'Industrial areas before �YtYt.x } compatibility :problems. . Although the retail siale._3f this project is much larger, off-set hours will ensures that surrounding businesses will not be negatively`-JmvaG.ted. In addition, there are no residential uses "utthin more than 500 feet of the proposed use and therefore, no conflicts with residential uses are anticipated. F2 -J PLAINING CO Ow oTAFY 'SPORT. - CUP 91-03 - J*!rS PAGE 1 June 26, 1991 Page 4. 2. parking: The parking ,requirement for an In Wholesale/Retail Commercial use is one parking ,space:per � 100 square "feet. However, a parking requirement of one space per ,150 square feet may permitted based upon a detailed parking study. The applicant has "submitted a Parking"Study, 'completed by Austin Foust and Associates, to justify the one space per '150'square, feet parking requirement'(see"Exhibit "G"). A total of 760 parking spaces are available on-site. The Planning Commission policy is 'ta require an 'additional 10 percent buffer to accommod6te for ;unexpected fluctuations and minimize "rolling" effect. Wiih a 10`parcent. buffer,. the site can accommodate a maximum demand fcr 691,-,,parking spaces at any given time (760 spaces/110 percent, 691 'spaces). The' Shared Parking Study concludes that,.maximum parking demand using the-1:150 parking ratio' is 609 spaces,on a .Friday evening and 707 spaces on a Saturday afternoon (see. Exhibit "G", Table 8, page 13). With 7a, 10 percent buffer, the site would require a minimum of 178 ;spaces !Io?7 + 110, percent 778). Therefore, a 'parking"°ratio``6F 1:150 for the �'- proposed use, plus the other site uses; would exceed the City's allowable parking demand by 16 spaces..; Hcwever, Ask EY, this would still leave almost an ,8 percent buffer. Furthermore, this parking, demand would only exceed.""the City's allowable 'parking demand for approximately one hour at 2:00.. p.m. on Saturday` afternoons., Therefore, staff supports the use of 1:150 parking ratio for the proposed use because the study demonstrates that adequate parking will exist. 3. Aesthetics Maintenance of the site and signage are the' two primary issues related to the aesthetics. The proposed use includes sales of food and beverages for on- sice consumption. `:Both these issues are addressed within the management plan, submitted;by the applicant. (See attached Exhibit "F".) Maintenance personnel will patrol the site during hours, of operation to ensure proper storage of refuse (bo•.`tr`on-site-:and off-site refuse), as a direct result of the use. Any heavy maintenance'or repairs necessary'"to continue :the aesthetic' quality. of -the site will be done during,";the week, when the site is not in operation.' 'Staff would also recommend-a condition " prohibiting outdoor display or sales of products or food. AIL signage, in ,conjunction with the proposed use is subject to the City's Sign Ordinance and/or any Uniform ; Sign Program in place. In addition, permanent gall si s .. v PLANNING COMMISSION' STAFF REPORT CUP 91-03 -:JAMES'PAGE June-26, 1991 Page 5 and/or monument signs in con0iinct on with this use, may be reviewed by the 'Oesig— ate,riew�Committee, through the sign' pormit process. All other,:,,,,esthetic issues related to this use, such as grafild removal, have been addressed within the attached conditions of.approval. Traffic: .part of the suimmintal.paokage, the:Engineering Division regv`red that a traffic study be submitted addressing the following .issues: 1 Trip;generation', 2. Traffic volume distriution 3. Access analysis 4 Inter nal circulation c n 5. Mitigation 'measures, if required by analysis, shall he shown. Upon review of the;l,,proposed`Indoor 'Wholesale/Retail use, it was determined tha, no-significant traffic-impacts would occur, as a direct resu7;c of the proposed use. In addition, the City Traffic Engine`, approved the Traffic Analysis submitted by the applicant ar�d recommends .that no mitigation measures are necessary. E. Rancho Cucamonga V_LreeDDis�k. ict/Police Department. Both the Fire District and the''Police'Department,have been :notified of the proposed use. , The Police Department has `expressed no significant concern over the proposal.. The Fire District will require plan check prior to occupancy. The applicant has been working with the Building and Safety Division :to address building code and safety issues (see, Exhibit'"KI). F. ;,Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Initial 'rStudy for this project. The potential environmental impacts related to an Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial use locating within an industrial center are ' traffic, parking, ar_d aesthetics. All these issues are addressed through the Traffic Impact Study', the shared parking study, and management plan as :discussed earlier. Although there- is the potential . for significant environmental effects in these areas, -staff has found that there will not be a significant effect in this case because of the mitigation ' measures which have been included as conditions of approval. ;Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration.. e %1 ` J PZANNING bOMMISSION STAFF'REPORT CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE Junes"2&; 1991 Page 6 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Co mmission mast make..all of the following findings in order to:approve this,application: A. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of, the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial,Specific Plan Subarea in which the site. is located. B. That the , use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare'- or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ,C. That the 'proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. IV i?ORRESPONDFNCE: This item alas be=n advertised as a public hearing Ln"the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, ,the property has been posted,; and notices were sent to adjacent property, owners *ithin 300 feet of the project. i The Mission Land Company, an Uadjoining property owner, has submitted a letter,stating their oppositi , to the proposed indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial Use (see Attacned Exhibit "L"). N. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning 'Commission <: approve Conditional Use Permit 91-03 through adoption of the attached Resolutiou of Approval. Resp ully s fitted, Br a Ile '. C_.t Pl anner ( Y BB:Ax:jB Attachments Exhibit "A" - Sie Plan Ernibit "B" - Floor plan I�xhibit "C Interior Concept ]Exhibit "D" '- Owner's Letter i,cddbit "E" Applicant Letters Exhibit "F"'- Management Plan Exhibit "G"- Parking Study Exhibit IV - Lease Agreements, Exhibit "I" - CCWD`Letter' Exhibit "J - Preliminary Fire District Comments Exhibit "K" - Preliminary Plan Check Review Comments Exhibit "L" - Mission Land Co. Letter - Request for dft Denial j Resolution of Approval .r ClYMwj 3fn8 i F ASh AV MN111,M i . N 3AV N3AVN C 3AV OT181NatlV Q b�dil9 /� .moAMM lei t. c p 'a 7 � F m � C y X U O { III ML 111 +I HP Sao, r _r _ - ,ter ir• � ., �` _f- ... B 1 :} • lJ I �.. 66 ��: CL C tit � I I 77 a n N 1 Z=1 I 3 •: l� n v �I a • $� 16 I � •��� �it•s -y: t o,1 g � �� If {7n_ lie I�iNd t -r yf� r �s1�4T t t s s } . � 6�- l� JAN- 1 �-91 THU id T 3 tia P Mission Bi Mion .7anuary T 4. 1917. wosbicor•. incorporated .. 15645 Sherran Way, van NuyZ. California 91406 RE: Conditional Use Permit application ao6r•oval and parking approval for, 115ZO 6th Street, Rancho Cucainongja, California. Dear Jim: This letter- shall serve as Stenton/5uffalo.Partner's, towner• of the above,-.referented building) for Wasticor to process a conditional use permit at the above addt•ess. In addition, the owner, has granted to the applicant the usa c�f 771 non exclusive reciprocal parking spaces as stated in the-CC & R•s sut Sect_to +one City of Rancho Cucamonga's C.U.P. approval during applicant's busino:s hours on Frz,day afte rnoons, Saturdays and Sundays. 1, Sincerely, Fchard R. Stanton Managing General Partner CCa''', Nance Clause Bob Andrews David Moon Jamas Lowy v-f F-16 _ n»rw.n.L-^ ^a e^C" V74A%CA's e000 CAY]?.,h C41 CC44 January li, 1991 Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California 9113U Dear Persons,: Westieor Ineorp is applying to the Planning Department ,of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to use the Existing Facilities located at,>11b30 SIXTH Street as a MINI-MALL for weekend use, ONLY.,. The number oi,'-employees on weekends would be seven, including parking and security personnel We believe this use is compatible with the present use of the complex for the following Are 11 J 1) The adjacent buildinq;,:has been app oved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for use as a Retail Office 2) Our use is Retail Sales on weekends, Only. 3) Our facility impacts the area Only at a time when our complex and the area is virtually unoccupied. 4) our facility creates NO IMPACT during the week when ALL OTHER FACILITIES are being used. ` We removed the use of 1UU,UUU sq ft of traffic, noise and air pollution in this area at the most critical times. S We nave medigat:ed any Police or Fire problem that. may occur by providing both. SECURITY SERVICE "24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A REEK, and FIRE SPRINKLERS. 6) We are increasing Tax Revenues and.-IMusiness License Fees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 7) He are creating Employment Opportunl;ties for the Local Residents for weekend work. (2nd Jab, so critical in today economy). U) We are providing a. NEW BRIcIRT familyi�entertainment r and discount center for the Residents ol; the City. 9) We are,'consisr; with the Development and Use of- the General Area, AkiUFACTURES OUTLET CON.PLEX and RETAIL CENTERS,,_ south c')f us. ioiw4` create NO DISTURBANCE, ALL OUR ACTIVITIL_ 4rE WITHIN THE BUILDING, and, CREATE NO OUTSIDE VIGUA. SE- FACTOR t,1 _ The only impact we Will have will be Traffic generated, but on '.i=ENDS ONLY. This will be medigated by our ALTERNATE. USE of- the area when the surrounding area is NOT OCCUPIED nor BEIKG USED. in general, our facility is considered RETAIL. Most Cities require a parking ratio of 4 to b parking spaces ,Der thousand sq; ft of GROSS AREA. I must explain that the SQ FT RATIO of RENTABLE FOOTAGE to GROSS FOOTAGE in OUR FACILITIES is MUCH LOWER THAN THE TRADITIONAL RETAIL MALLS, (bb% in ours to 664 to Jbt in Your Large Malls) This means a 1Uu to lbt surplus reserve parking factor in our facility. We also have parking attendents who direct and protect the customers during their attendance at our Mall which increases parking efficiency. We have available, ON SITE, 171 PARKING SPACES that are available to us during weekends. During our first phase, we will be using approximately bU,000 gross sq ft of building and will have about. 15.42 parking spaces per 1,UUU sq ft of GROSS AREA of BUILDING. When our MALL is TOTALLY OCCUPIED, 103,bbZ sq ft, our PARKING RATIO will be /.4 spaces per 1,000 sq ft of GROSS AREA of BUILDING. This is well in excess of any CITY CODE 'REQUIREMF,NTS ARL for any City in Southern California with the possible exception of thous SPECIAL-ZONES in the congested areas of the CITY of LOS ANGLES. The Street configuration of wide divided streets with quick access, Fourth Street, Milliken Avenue and Arrow Highway gives us superior traffic circulation in the entire Area including both the lb a lU Freeways, without the necessity of impacting any residential zones. Our MINI`-MALL is Superior to all Indoor and outdoor Retail Facilities. It can only be compared to a Small Regional Mall, but for parking purposes we are providing a comparable Parking Study. The facility in Costa Mesa (outdoor, 4UU,Uuu sq ft) IsFreeway orientated, but is surrounded by a Re,idential Neighborhood. Parking Ratio appears to be about 6 spaces per 1,000. The facility in Gardena, THE RODIAN ('Outdoor, JUU„UUU Sq ft) has one entry, ROSECRANS BLVD., IS highly congested and is surrounded by Residential which is highly impacted by this facility. Parking Ratio is about 4 spaces per 1,000 sq ft. ,i The facility In woodland Hills, (Indoor, 11U,UUU sq ft) ONE OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL FACILITIES IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA is locates within a Residential area. Narrow streets provide the only access through residential streets. _ Parking Ratio is about 6 spaces per 1,U00 sq ft. The ROSE BOWL, (outdoor, bUU,Uuu .sq fti has probably the best Phys.,cal Location.. However, even thougo it is close to the Freeufays some access is through R4sident al Areas— Parking Ratio Is Superior probably 1b or more spaces per 1,boU sq tt. CHINO AUCTION. tOutdoor, iSU,UUU- sq ft1. This location is an old Dairy. 'Tnese facilities are really .a-number of Old Builaings that were converted from faed lot shacks to booths over the years. Part of the area still is>,,,operated for animals, There is poor access, again through narrow, streets. The area is Residential to the North, East and West and vacant industrial to the South. Parking Rat ,oj. :s ;Superior due to"tlhe large amount of vacant land but the only parking areas used are corner dirt lots with no pre $esignat,q parV.,, q spaces. These lots require youlco Jay walk in order to enter t�e facility. Total. Parking Ratio available probably 12 or mor' spaces per 1,UU9 sq ft. We believe that the strength of our location on SIXTH STREET in Rancho Cucamonga is that, the immediate area is NOV RESIDENTIAL and has SUPERIOR TRAFFIC' CIRCULATION. The RESIDENTIAL. in. the MARKET AREA is ADEQUATEY REMOVED from this location yet 'elose enough to service the N"v RETAIL FACILITIES developing along Fourth Street. Within this MARKET AREA, this site; is located -in a BUFFER AREA where weekend traffic is nominal but where weekday traffic is certainly schedulers for An increase. With the approval of our use, we; will remoue or mitigate the congestion of over 1UU,000 sq ft of space which wili never-again negatively impact this axea:, Sincerely, James Page Carnival Malls JRP/la `J c� I v I, Jahua--y �2, 19y1 Planning Depa_cment City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California 91/30 Dear Friends: Wasticor Incorp is avplying to tie Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for permission to use the Existing Facilities located at 11S30 SIXTH Street as a MINI-MALL for weekend use. ONLY. We believe the use of this location for ou_."-MINI-MALL provides and allows GREAT BENEFITS to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to it's Residents and the entire region in general 'or the following reasons: O?-ir MINI-MALL, "CARNI`r'AL & an International Marketplace is just that, a miniture Regional MAll with FUN! we are NOT a SWAPMEET, as you will see when we submit our fina-l .;interlor elevations. we a now have Booths, we have Small Custom Designed Stores without `lass fronts. Our stores will be smaller in size than terse in `,e Regional Mail, averaging approximately 300+ sq ft. par store. „-se store are ail open; operate and 'close when our Mail closes. St )-es in each area are color coordinated and must be approved by o,_ir Decorator prior to construction. our Mall,.ceilings are blue =ni .ur walis are white with a blue border traversing the entire perim,ater to meet on each side of our logo just above- tte display stage. You will note from our floor Plan that we have a very distinctive ntertairment area consisting of a carpeted KIDDYLAND %ihera People can sit and rest while watching their children; ' They ,have a dhoice of watching FREE sporting eventsyor cartoons on monitors, while relaxing or waiting .for otheL^, members of their tamely in this area. In other areas, we have arranged for silent radio (moving script), suspended monitors (tele:i'i'sion) and a public address system to inform and entertain the entire family. Passive Entertainment, V:SIBLE'MOVO4ENT, UNUSUAL DISPLAYS? VARIETY in MERCHANDISE and UNIQUE TENANTS wiil add to customer Interest and education as they travel around our Mall. The coordination of a SPOTLESS MALL, ( WHITE), with v,;bd_at 'j STOREFRONT colors, !BLUE. YELLOW, RED; GREENt ORANGE and LILIAC1 . soft background MUSIC and entertaining DISPLAYS will create a Ljv FAMIL7 CENTER drawing the local residents to support t,us Ccmmunity Facility. „ r {I i aYe arranged a MIX a3 A!ERLHANDISE that People want AT DEEP DISCOUNT PRICES. Th�Te will be a variety of store owners,. LOCAL RETAIL TENANTS, tseeklnq greatar. Yolumn' MANUFACTURERS, tsmall Outlet stored . IMPORTERS, txihique items), and ARTISANS, tone of =a kind itans, . This merchandise mix can be ioundnowhere. in the united 'States, today! You are aware, as we are, of the problems that, SWAPMEETS NEVER ADDRESS. We have addressed Phase problems by usinq--they-SOLUTIONS CREATED by the "BETTER RUN REGIONAL, MALLS"'. 1) SECURITY We supply SECURITY. 24 HOURS,:/ DAYS.,'t: LEEK, even when our FACILITIES ARE CLOSED! "ll MAINTENANCE We supply MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL EVERY HOUR WE ARL OPEN to clean up,"both inside u outside_ in addition we have�ALL 'WEEK to do any heavy maintenance or repa ?:s necessary to- keep our facility in TOP CONDITION. since we are PART of a LARGER COMPLEX, we are REQUIRED' to PAY TO PARK MFd 4AGEMENT CHARGES FOR. ADDZTIONAL "PARK.";MAINTENANCE”! This in itself, ,"QUAP.ANTEES" the CLEAN ENVIRONMENT we. ALL: WANTI, t 31 PARKING PARKING is the NOST'CRI1 "'ISSUE we a'=, owners must addr iss- .. We,-, reviousiy /+ explained that our RENTAELE',-"1SITY, (percentage of space rented to gross square footage of building) is LESS TRP.0 THE REGIONAL MALLS'. HOWEVER,-Was, supply PARKING !€, PERSONNEL ",NOT" to PARK CUSTOMER CARS, but to DIRECT the Customers':to open spaces, and protect agp-linst, the'congestion-Jf traffic. THE BONUS: the IMPORTANT ability to MAINTAIN .the OUTSIDE, "BEI'ME TRASH BECOMES A' PROBLEN"! Asp; SECURITY to PROTECT the CUSTC".,-_p and POLICE the "FARKING AREAS AGAINST CRIME! 4 1 TRAFs LG - L ";,we have PLANNED our,Mini-Mal l opsgation to ^.EMOVE the TRAFFIC CONGESTION PROBLEM. We aware that cur: ability to maKe a ;'zss of our :nail was in direct atei'atIonsnip to our ability to:8akVe PAR!CIC?G AVAILIBIJ=Y and TO REMOVE ;`' AFFIC ° ;,,PNGESTI,O$, We have done this by LOCA11z I IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL rAREHOUS& ZONES- may I when you' laoate� in a zone,where !r� 'USE "ALTERNATES w3kth YOUR;PIGHBORS L':;::+ ' "YOU�CREATE" A WIP<4 FJiN" SITUATION FG1 t, ;+ ALL S �.:: 3 r: I belleve that in this world EACH INDIVIDUALS ,SUCCESS IS BASED ON "CREAT'IVE PL.ANhING" THAT IT ADDRESSES PROBLEMS,' ALL PROBLEMS and, SOLVES those PROBLEMS to "EVERYONE'S" BENEFIT"d TRgT`IS EXACTLY "WHAT WE BELIEVE IN and IS THE—MOTIVATING;,rQRCE" BEHIND WHAT WE " ARE DOING. WE SEEK SUCCESS FOF,OUR TENAN; OUR NEIGHBORS.—OUR, ;-=-OUR, CUSTOMERS, OUR COMMUNITY,. OUR CITY ands g ,,,.VES': I .you'TRUB'Y UNDERUTOOD OUR "ENTIRE OPERATION" YOU W(ULD SEE WHY. THIS is EXACTLY WHAT WE MUST DO and WHY WE M4�,-,T DO IT! :one of our PARTNERS is a resicl3nt oZ RANCHO CUCAMONGA. This ss OUR CITY. ie are PART Of this COMMUNITY and as ,such ''have h`�tarted PROGRAMS TO BENEFIT THE.,,COMMUNITY. YSWT IT gTkhNGE BUT. 'THESE � r PROGRAM.^, BENEFIT EVERYONE'? Isn't that the WAY BIncerei i,, �- WESTICOR INCORP, at t ce enY 4 a y P .la" ti �A 91 F-�lo ii 1 rrCAI&I7AL Wl oVERVIET L t r'Carnival V in its basic form is an indoor retail mini-mall with individually ot4rated'�permanent stores". The stores will offer a wide variety of nev n;=hhandise, selling at discount. t "Carnival bill will be designed and prompted as a destination location for shopping., browsing and light amusement. Mul.tiple.locations are planned,, based-on a common theme and decor, to be`supported by a t�:alt3- media advertising and promotion pro;;2=. Primarily targeted at entire Families,:,the c"imate- controlled malls will also appeal to=customers of all ages. On-going passive, visuasl';ilwni;artainmcnt, coupled r with sparkling clean colsrfy and bright decor, will make.it a, desirable shopri,i facility for loyal customers. Snack-type fast mood services will support extended shopping excursions by. the typical customer. host locations will be visible Zrom a-,freaway or situated on a major.-street, facilitating 'impulse shopping,by residing beyond the immed'alate area. "Carnival all malls will fall a void for vandor, as we,l as shoppers. Vise upward tr'eiid of retail resits, a very limited supply of small. retail spaces in usual retail strip centers, coupled with demarzds by lessors for higher and higher net valuations for their tenant at the time of leasing have effectively foreclosed many entrepreneurs from the marketplace# The resultant,, i latent number of'prospective ;randors 'Igor a "Carpi+ral V site ensures that management can be selective in obtaining the quality of vendor desired. "Carnival. V malls will be distinguished from any Other existing facility by he theme decor and internal design concepts, by the variety of mcizchaandise;in a : single location offered at deep dircc+unt prices, and the fresh, changing image'desig:3ed to promote customer interest and loyalty (e.g., accenting,major holidays).. Exhibit "A", attached, presents a draft of a prospective vendar-*s information sh®st,. 2. TARGET M—NMT "Carnival &" malls are targeted at entire families and will offer -many family-oriented benefits, but will appeal to persons of all ages and all shopping objectives (except grocery items). The breadwinners of theii}-pical family today find their family budget stretched tightly in many directions, The nigh costs of the 'necessities of everyday life --' continually increasing,,-- have placed cletax limits on discretionary spending. A night at tlie;lacal movie theater, a day at the amusement park or a day,at the baseball game have become major expenditures which the typical family is less able to afford. The desire of and pressure on a father and/or mother to broaden the knowledge,and interests of their children remains, however, as rented movie videos and TV viaeo games have their limits: h 10Carnival 0 malls will provide a new entertainment ontioa for families that face tiles! issues, while offering excellent-shopping values' for all family members. Broadly speaking, °Carnival O malls will be located in middle to middle-upper class. areas.' Experience has shown that rembers of all income stratas enjoy bargain merchandise. 2n fact, one of the most successful indoor multi-vendor facilities (lacking nearly all of tLe amenities planned for "Carnival all malls ha;s operated successfully for se sal years in Woodldnd' Hills, a well-to-do west Safi Fernando Valley community,. 3. YOCATTQNS AIM MA'_gWET a, AK73S Responding to the needs of both the marketplace and its vendors, "Carnival: W' will expand its Gperations to as many as a dozen locations in PT-)n Los Angeles Basin in the next ftv years. U-pansion will be measured yet study, resulting in a major discount market force in the region. The desirnhi.lity of expansion beyond the immediate metropo?it;an area will be reviewed as local operations progress. An exarip,.t of possible coordinated mall 'locations is shown in ibit "B", attached. The Load strategy for eaah'mall to draw the majority of its customers : from the ,abrea within a 'five-mile radius. Prominent' freeway Vocations will probably draw significantly from a larger .%rea (typically an elliptical pattern oriented with its long %J 1 g axis parallel to the freeway) . ,- Consideration will be given to natural. geolotl1cal barriers between sites in some cases, which could result in somewhat closer positioning of Pny- t�4o sites. Desired demographic factors include a resident;. population of at least 200,000 in the five-mils radius area and, secondarily, of at least 400,000 in a ten- mile radius area. The minimum average household income target for the five-mile radius area is $35,000/year. 4. VMORS -- TYPES ! WARD'S 7ND 4TRATEGI�°S In general, there will be three types of vendors local entrepreneurs operating in;.a single location, regional entrepreneurs with stores in'multiple malls, and owners of established businesses, typically located in a strip center in a local marketing area, seeking a high-traffic volime outlet for surplus or off-season merchandise, ,I All vendors will be limited to the sale of new merchandise (with the singular exception of true antigaes) . Competition within a particular mall as to any one line of merchandise will dictate that the large; maj�7rity of sales will be at a discounted price., VenOors will be required to sign a 6-month lease, with month-to-month tenarcy prevailing thereafter. Each vendor will be required to obtain and display a valid business license. Vendoeawhich operate successfully and in full compliance with; the lease and related regulations will have a priiority opportunity to be selected for other Dell loAations. Typical merchandise_and sertice specialities to be found in tr: malls included Ir Clothing, womens ` Toys Clothing, 'mans Hobby, crafts - Clothing, children 1,` Hobby, models. T-Shirts Animals, stuffed Jewelry,' costume "'`( plants, live Jewelry, tine plants a flowers, Shot. II4 artificial Fabrics 1 metics at Baskets Cos !personal care , Greeting cards Crystal h Books China* y Supplies pottery Pit Supplies Home furnishing accessories Candles Bed an.8, Oath Electronic egR�ig+. small Anti4uesh Audio & Video, equip; small r � t Atchenware Audio, Video & game tapes Hardware tristmas and other seae- Art, framed sonal decorations Art, live (caricatures) Auto parts § accessories Gift items, manufactured Home services ('cabinets, Gift items, hand-made carpeting, carpet Gift items, one-of-a-kind* cleaning, spas) Luggage, purses, accessories office supplies, paper Food services products *May be location-sensitive Food services will be limited to those prepared with legally non-vented ecraipment (includes microwave and electric steam table) . 'Examples inc?.ude: Hot dogs Sandwiches _ Baked, potatoes Pasta=es baked off-p_pmisas (muffins, donuts, cookies) Candy Packaged snacks (potato chips, etc.) Ice.cream and yogurt popcorn Selected fruit (apples, bananas) Beverages (non-alcoholic) 5. PROMOTION _XND ADVERTZSTNG Promotion and advertising will play a major role in establishing "Carnival &" malls as destination shopping locations and developing strong customer loyalty. An advertising agency has been engaged to develop a coordinated t2+2me concept;,for the malls, and a comprehensi-va promotion and advertising plan for both "Carnival &'" as a whole and for ?nd vidual malls in specitic :locations. Radio and,.cable W will be used extensively for the messagesraout-thi "Carnival fi" theme and concept, and local "publications (stch as. Pannysavers) will prarzote -dhe specific malls and offer free-admission coupons to attentive•. consumers In-mall entertainment and promotions will play a major role ,in building customer loyalty and repeat business. The entertainment will be family-oriented and "just plain fun", making the local. "Carnival &" mall the place to be shoppers will ',ae amused by and interact with magicians, mimes,_'jugglers, clowns and others as they pursue their shopping interests throughout the mall. Both advertised and unadvertised drawings for gifts, travel packages, and similar "instant" benefits will stimulate customer atteWlance and participation, Changing entertainment and promotion themes will keep �- _Z6 x the mall atmosphere fresh and interesting to adults and ch_ldrer. -1-like. r 6. 7ACIUTY-DESIGN AND DECOR Exterior a Few modifications are anticipated to the exterior of i "Carnival V buildings. In most cases, an existing off-white or pastel earth tone painted surface will suffice.' Normal business signags, of a height and length consistent with the_size of the buildino is contemplated. The size and style of sic;ns will be determined by mutual agreement with building owners and governmental agencies. For promotional and identification purposes, a tethered balloon will be roof-mounted where permitted by city' regulations and lease agreements. In some cases, depending upon the location of the principal customer parksng area,,, a" new customer entrance/exit door may be required (ramped in the case of' truck-high buildings to ensure access for AML handicapped customers) . J Interior r The permanent, stores.vAll be laid cut in a grid pattern. The stores will be modular, typically based on a­i0 ft. X 10 ft. size. The aisles will vary in width from 10 ft. to 15 ft. as needed The design of the stores will permit units to be Combined to create larger stores. Experience indicates that the "average" vendor will occupy 1.5 basic units (65% - 1 unit, 22& - a units; 7% - 3 units, 4% - 4 units, 2t - 5 units) . In most "Carnival all locations, the stores will be constructed with stud and drywall side and rear walls,. A unique concept is under review for providing fully securable stores (as to the ceiling and front surfaces) which will not interfere with lighting needs and fire protection systems. The interior decor will bs coordinated by professionals. ;Present plans include off-white tones for most surfaces in the stores, with pastel trim and accent colors in certain locations (sae "color-codingea a below) . Store signs will be substantially uniform in size and location, while providing the vendors sufficient flexibility as to originality., As a convezaience to the shopper, and to pertit other,'_) opportunities to carry out the overall theme, the aisles will become "streets" with names such is "Circus Court" or "Sideshow Street", and the stores on each street will carry a trim color which color-codes each street for easy identification. Additional decorations such as .banners, will be suspended from the ceilihl of the building and mounted on the building walls. The building walls will be painted in a color which suits the theme and coordinates with the other colors, Physical impro ements In the buildings may include additional rei,-Irocros, ;lighting, floor drains,- evaporative coclirig and space heating. 7. OPERX IONS, STAPPING, POLICY-ES The majority of sales in "Carnival V walls will be made during 'weekend hours The exact hours of operation at any one location will be a result of marketplace need and .potential, desires of the v,=dars, agreements with the property owner and permits�g?tanted in the local community,. i �!P` Typically, the minimum hours of operation would be Friday evening, Saturday and Sunday. In some cases, malls will also open-on,_';hursday and all-day Friday. In other cases, additiona 'weeknights would be added to complement the weekend operations. Rarely, a mall might be open 6 full days during a week. During the Christmas season, closing hours could be extended, etc. Ample nearby parking is a key objective for each mall. Equally important is easy access to the parking for customers and- assistance in locating open parking stalls. A11 " arnival &" malls will have attended,�� parking in arc%r to speed tho parking-process, assist the: customers rand enhance the mall security. Attendants will be in uniform/costume to help carry out the "Carnival fi" themes. Where possible, ;parking for customers and vendors will be separated. .Some locations involving shared,parking may require portable signs, to be provided by "Carnival fit" managemaant, of the "Park Karen and "Don't Park Here" variety. Parking areas will be cleared of trash aat the and of each, business session. �4 Each mall will have its own on-site staff including--,a mall manager. Additional staff will include those AOL involved-with admissions, accounting, maintenance .and parking. A headquarters staff, which will rotate among and be on-call to the separate 'mails will include general management, accounting, vendor relations/ coordination, and consultants in various specialty areas. Vendors will initially sign a 6--=ath lease, with month-to-month tenancy prevailing tYiereafter. Vendors will be required to obtain and displly,a current business license. Vendors will be rey aired to adhere to a set of written policiea and pract`ces to remain in good standing. of principal importance 4s cleanliness of the stores and aisleways, presenta�-�jn of merchandise, and uniformity in signage f Individual vendors will have some flexibility on?; ou_s of operation, subject to certain miri-imum�coi.lstra nts. It's expected that perhaps one-third ji` %`the vendors will operate in all of the ',Carnival &mall locations. All vendor leases and tissues will be cocirdinated by a permanent member of the headquarters staff ? olding 'a California real estate license. Building security will be provided by management. In addition, most malls are expected to feature 'a unique approach to individual stare security which will permit vendors some flexibility in hours of operation and also f minimize movement of merchandise. t� Typically, "Carnival &" malls will be opeA-1for business within 90 days following the granting of necessary permits and licenses by local governmental agencies. q� plxMCIAL ps,ax 'Carnival v will operate in a variety of location_ and a; var iety et of facilities. No two facilities wi-t_�,te e alike in s size , configuration ..�n or other r attributes. physical For financial planning purposes, a 65,000 scg. ft. building has been examined as a prototype mall facility. Exhibit "C", attached, provides relevant financial information Mall vendors will lease the store units at $500/mo each. The lease will require'a first and last:month's rent, plus a Unit� eposit of $500. . 9. oWl7ERSITYa AND OPSRA'PYDNS 'PEAR c Alk "Carnival ET,)is a division of Westicor Incorp., a California real estate dzvelopment corporation incorporated'in 1984. Westicor Incorp is owned by Mr. Jim Pi'�e. Mr. Page has been active in business and ream estate' for over 30 years as a contractor, developerr:�,id commercial real property owner. Current ho!44d `ngs include office buildings and retail centers. Through a sutvidia%,Y venture, IDS, Mr. 'Page consults on'Z,and use and financing -or others for domestic and international real estate, vei`ltres. . r Mr. ,Page has assembleda team of specialists as consultants to or affil ates'for the "Car'ival V project as follows; The owner/operator of a somewhat parallel venture located in Florida (established in business for a yei• s), as .a general consultant on set- operations and financial management. AML -- An interior design/decor consultant concerned with theme decor implementation, color coordination, 'and general internal design`issue4> An advertising agency,,( oncerned with theme j concepts, promotion and-zd_vertising 1 implementation. -- A parking services consultant, concerned with traffic patterns and flow efficiency. A good service consultant, concerned with food mix selection, equipment, sources and point of sale q considerations. A licensed real estate agent experienced in -� commercial and retail lease negotiation and management. I ll of 1 lI `�~ ti y i MAM TechWcal Notes Prepared for. - 1 Caramel Nam Pmpared by: Amztit¢.Forest Asxodate4 T 2020 North.Temtin A'nun Santa Asa,California 92701 (714)667-0496 " MW 31,1991 F-L5- n \`, ! INDOOR RETAIL MALL j Technicp:Notes v DaRODUCHOPT Austin-Foust Associates,Inc.(AFA)has completed a parking study for the Indoor Retail Mall located at the northwest corner of Buffalo Avenue and Sixth Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga- T_s Ftnject will occupy one of three existing buildings and share the use of the favailable parking with the adjacent buildings lathe common parking,areas, The project site is proposed to be developed with 103,552 square feet of an Indoor Retail Mall that would cater to families with a mix of activities for both shopping and entertainment(!dddy Ades and telev1sion that includes sporting events and cartoons). The proposed hours of operation are 6.00 PM to 9:P; PM ' on Friday,10..00 AM to 8:00 PM on Saturday and 10.00 AM to 6:00 PM^on Sunday. The study approach involved an actual cease study.,Af the fluctuations iu hourly parking demand for the proposed use to determine the time and extent of peAI►arkin& Typirallg t--or tl use sites are selected for case study,baud on ability to isolate the use and its parking,and then observed for two to three weekdays and a weebmd. In this case, the project„is unique and comparable developments do not exist. However,some similar developments do exist as indoor swap mtxt uses. The Indoor Retail Mall parking demap,'Js based on an actual c..se study of an existing indoor swap meet. The Atal hourly parking dtmanLeated by the proposed Indoor Retail Mall is then compared with the available spaces to determine if sufficient parking is provided ANALYSIS The project art,.is cutreatfy comprised of a total of 203,365 square feet of tx9mmercia4 hght industriallwarehoasiag,and oT=uses(35,308 square feet of ofte use,and approximately 165,057 square fcct of commertaal/liot industrial use)as illustra ed in Figure 1. Presently,;the site is 17 percent occupied (34,800 square feet of commerdal lgltt industrial). 'Tile vad-ty of uses at this location presents a good opportunity for recknocal or shared-r,:e of the a ilable paddag by tenants. Tice site presently provides appna nmasely 760 parking spaces. ,f� rI&W Pefta Ma!!' 1 Anodala4 Ire tl E - ANk O�Iyi08 Q s Lj Itll `�In:t::ttl, � i I IPl�llii�.r et,••I��R sit - 's9 .fit« � .$� to U��1'.r•.1'ult ,.'trllllrr r , r�-, - r. ,.,.- Iadoe=Res>ti Ua2 2 =Asowm inc- f i i Indoor Swan Meet Case 9tcdvAML i A case study of actualparking demand and'hourly accumulation for an indoor swap meet was conducted. Friday and Saturday were se!tcted as representing the most sin.'=peak parking demand for this type of levelopment The site selected was: 1 Stanton Indoor Swap Meet 10401 Beach Boulevard: T Stanton,California The observed hourly parking accumulation and percents usage are summarized in the following table: IT PAX1MNG ANALYSIS INDOOR SWAPMEEr Suntfln , 43 Size 40 75F 4 Mm mum Spz=Aa AM-m 107 HOUR WEEKDAY' gNEEt�2ID GF OBSERVED OBSERVED DAY SPACP3 % SpACE5 bam - - - - 8 am am _ - - 9 am - - 10 am 1t96 1s 2M 21 11 am 42% 45 639b 67 12 pta 50% 54 70% 75 1 PM' M 53: 84% 90 2 pm 60% 64 100% 107 3 pm 61% 6^ 90% 96 4 FM 69% 74 94% lip -ZM 65% 70 96 6 pat 65% 69 71% 76 7 B pm PM 9 pat - - 10 PC 11 pm - 1Z am An examination of this tab?—indicates that a mwdmum of 107 spat,virew occupied for,.he . site on Saturday at 2..00 PI4ri. Based on 40,000 square feet of tie and 107 parking spaces bead,cast tt5 Wdow RWH t',,r 3: AmW-,Fc=Anocistm loc. in,a parldng ratio of Z68 spaces per TSF(107 spaces per 40.0 TSF=IC8 spaces per TSF). For this analye,s,a 15 percent surplus factor has been added to the observed rate which yields a parkiiag rate of 3.1.spaces per'ISF(2.6 spaces x 1.15 percent=3.1 spaces. Therefore,based on actual case study, ,ke proposed 103-522?NSF indoor retail mail will require s parldng demand of 320 spaces(103,552 r+Ir't. " X 3.1 spaces per.TSF=320 spaces). 'fir-then site in Woodland Hills,was examined for use in the case study,however,security at s:.e+u.,arlal not permit counting of the Ciridng. Off_-sita.observations of the parking usage did intucl+te:hat the on-site parldng provided(759 spaces)was more t1Lm sufficient at this site to meet the demand. Using the site size of 150 TSF and 759 available parking spaces calculates to a parking ratio of 5.06 spaces per TSE (759 spares per 150.00 TSF=5.06 spaces per.tSF). Industrial Maraufactnsireg 6LYa�hallslb$Caae Stndv A case stu` of actual arl'ta demand and hour accumulation for an industrial- manufacturirg/warehousing facility was conducted.Friday and Saturday were selected as representing the most similar peak parldng-demand for this type of development. Two sites were selected: Regal Rattan,Rancho Cucamonga Pier 1 Importer,Rancho Cucamonga The highest observed hourly parking accumulation and percent usage are summarized in Table 1. An examination of this table indicates that a maximum of 13 spaces (72 percent) were occupied for the site on Friday at 11:00 AX These observed hourly paring demand cation were :Yeti to determine the total hourly parldmg,demand for the remainder of the industrialhva zhoas!ng use(26.705 TSF)a.;the site. -_ Hourly parking accumulation percentages for office and the commercial/industrial uses are derived from the,Urban Land institute (ULI)publication,Shared Ea_W lg,dated.1983 and other Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. (AF.44 parking studies Vupania l`?te,study is Rancho' Cucamongz). tndcae Retail le!ls11 d As da-rvw Ano=te,Lac t�'Z Air— 1 , Table 1 FARP' G ANAOSIS-DMU,,TRLA6LMANUFAcnTe NOfWAREHOUSIN'a ` N ' Regal Rattan Rancho 0.1 a Men S6= 34S TSF Spaces Requited: 18(l/m) HOUR WEEKDAY,, D OF OHSMVED OBSERN,9W 4`AY 96 SFAGC FF4 % SPACES c.• 6 am } 7 am 8,am 9 am _ d 10 am 72% 13 0R5 0 11 any 50% 9' 0%., 0 12 pm, 61% 11 0% " 0 S Pee 50%, 9 " 0% 0 ®\ 3pm 44%v 0 0% 0 pm 44% a 0% 0 4 pm 44% 8 0% 0 >i 5 pm 22%- 4 Y 0% 0 if b pm — 0% 0 7 pm 8 pm _ 9 pm 10 pm _ 11 pm _ 12 am _ IJI tat ,c hl m Ret o Mau 5 c. R.ut6•Fottcl Atmaaua f= F- 3o ''be project site presently provides 76o parking spaces to serve the site land uses, The City of Rancho Cucamoaga requires a 10 percent buffer to accommodate fnr une xpected LIuctuations in parking demand and parking turnoler. With a 10 percent buffer, We center can accon±medate a maximum demand for 691 parking spaces at any given time(760 spaces/110 percent=691 spaces). The Urban Land Institute has found that reciprocal or shared use.parking can result in a reduction of pa_rldng requirements as a result of land uses that operate during off- t mes of adjacent land uses. a The ar" li p kmg demand for.the project was examined using the retail (Alternative 1), the observed indoor swap meet(Alternative 2)parlcng demand and a 1:150 (Alternative 3)parking ratio for the project. Table 2 presents the demand rates for each of the site usa�at any given time and the total parking demand based on the Sim.uses under the three altemeti^ves. Tables 3 through 8 summarize the projected parking demand and reciprocal use rates for the three alternative site uses. The"net parking demand'column contains the estimated parking demand for the ultimate site uses based c shared parking and reciprocal We. As this table shoes,the maximum parking demand on a Frinay evening would be 570 spaces(Alternative 1),357 spaces(Alternative 2),or 609 spaces(Alternative 3). Oa a Saturday evening,the nmum parking demand would be 430 spaces (.iternative 1),336 spa=(AliO-'Mtive 2),or 707 sparest(Alternative 3). With a 10 percent buffer, the center would require a minimum of 677 parking spa=under, Alternative 1,393 spaces under Alternative 2,and 778 spa=under Alternative 3. II Me totals are weal below the existing supply of 760 parking spaces,eept for Saturday-Alternativt 3 at 2..00 PAL FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS A shared parking study,conducted by AFA,fowl a peak parking demand of 707 spaces for the site uses if the p,-Oposed project is rquimdto provide a parking ratio of 1:15a. The site presently Provides 760 parlt ng spaces, However,the City of Rancho CttcWj2onga requires a 10 t' WOW Rcaail Ma 6 Air W-FOM AMadatim tm _31 Table 2 „} SITE PARENG REQUME)s irM' is - _WEF. DAY- ..._WEEKMM 1 TOTAL TOTAL J SIZE PAR`Qrlt} SPACES 1'ARKLVG SPADES G_1ND USE TSF REO i_lfii niaNT RHQUMED REOunmiENT RRriLm:FtS j A4etsative 1 1 Indutttial ,f c Occupicd 348J0 1i2900 18 ' r 0 0 Vacant 26705 �/SODO 13 0 0 Olr= Vacant 38308 1=0 151 62�1000 26 Ret" 103352 440M 14 4/1000 414 TOTAL l 5 440 d Alt2 Industrial Occ spied 34= Iraw 18 0 0 Vacant 26,705 Mob 13 0 _ 0 Qface Vscaat 3$309 1/LR0 153 .WOOD 26 1n6otx Retail 1035S2 3.IAQW 3AA0Q0 320 TOTAL 504 346 Alfzsntbit3 induattial Occupied 33800 0 0 - Vxani, 26705 ;:9lQQfl 13 0 0 Omce Vtrant se 1Jm" 1 153 EA/ZOQt1 26 J 7ndooC Retail 103358 1:150 1:150 TOTAL 875• 717 F=00*-Idm W FU" Indmt RtUd Midi 7 'i Atntq-Fou�tt Aposiata.lac, 1 . ;j Table 3 Al ^" WEEKDAY C? w J HOURi Y ACCUh=AMOM OF PARKING j INDOOR RETAIL MALL(As Retail) \\ v— OCCUPIED VACANT VACANT VACANT Net n Hour INDUSTRIAL UMUS71UAL OFFICE RE1'AM) pa�n6 OI Day 46 Soaces % Spaces Soaces a t— 6.'00 AM — — — — 3% — t 8.00 — — — — 20% ,3y31 t ' 8% 1` 33 64 U 00 _ 63% is% 75 171 � 9.OQ 9S% 142 42% 174 316 10-.00 72 13 72 9 I004o 153 W% 392 457 11:00 .50 9 56` 7 ' 10!l% 153 87% 3b0 529 Moo Phi 6I 12' bl 8 90% 138' 97% 402 559 i S10 50 9 50 b 90Rr Ma 100� 414 570 r Z-00 44 8 44 ,6 97% 148 97% 402 564 3'00 44 8 44 6 97°a' 148 9556 393 555 4:00 44 8 44 6 77% 118 87% 30 492 5:00" 22 4 22, 3 47% 72 q.Y 79 327 406 23%; 35 .86 340 37f 7:00 — — — 756 Il o9'Ni 369 380 �'ro — — 7% 11 87% 360 37i 9:00 — — — 3% S 61% 253 258 t- 10.00 — — — 3% S-, 32% Im 138 1:00 54 1200 AM 23�r Si' ; MAXMIUM Mik(VG DEMAND 570 apwu at 1.00 FM Som= U batt Lend InadnVA"Shatad Patttay'2987- A=dn-Fom AaaoaatoN 1=,%fIrginja.Date Patldu Stady,•1m. TAN 4ti r\% jyt I� I iatidcc Rani[AQa11 8 l tt-Fotmt A®6o=Ux.Lee. �3-3 r( c• S Table 4 v f Altetaative I f( 16-URLY ACC[IMU"MON 0,,--PARWO ,,=OP.RETAIL MALL(Jo Ratiil) 1i OCCUPIED VACANT VACAK ,VACAUVT Net =Hour DMUSTRIAL INDUSMI L OFFICERETAIL'- Par1343 Of Day 96 Spax° % Sim % S u- 96 smco Orman 6.00 AM - 7:00 20% 5 355 12 17' &pp — — _ — 6096 16 10% 41 57 9.00 _ — - 8096' 21 Sat ,,124 1145 0 0 sm 21 8S 6 186 207 11:00 p 0 0 0 10096 26 73% 302 3237 12:00 PM 1 a 0 0 26 85'% 352 378 A 1 10 0 0 0 t i� 60'fii `21 9S% 393 414 0 0 6 0 1A% 16 ' 100'% 414 430 3,60 0 0 0 0 40Xo i0 1005b 414 424 4:00 0 0 0 0 40% 10 90% 373 383 S:00 D 0 0 0 M% 5 15E% 311 316 �-_ 6.00 — — — 20% S 65% 269 274 7.00 — — — 20% 5 6m 2i8 253 8.00 — 20% „ 5 55'% 228 233 405E I66 166 10.00 — — — — 38% 157 IV 1I 00• - — 1315 54 S4. 12t00 AM — — — — — — — MAXQrf M PAR1 ING DEMAND.430 spm at 2:00 PM Source: Utb=Laid Loath= PuMW 198'T. Auotba F.W Aes7dgw.Ix,'%-U ale Date Qadkll&04,19" 4 •W t: +1 }2 J r g AwdaFoM Auociii6&Inc, iadooraidaildt>;1f3 9 I 7 Table 5 t Alt=tft 2 NEE MAY IiOURLY ACCUMUL mON OF PARMNO uznoa�RsrAu.MnI.L. � OCCUPIED VACANT VACANT 'INDOOR, Net Hour INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAi /° O:FICE RETAIL Parking O Dtry °6 Staecea °b :tea % Soaoa 96 Spam Demand 6.00 AM 3% 5 - = 5 7:0o — — — 20% 31 —, 31 a 8:00 _ _ = 63% 96 --�p _ 96 l g0p 93% 142 42 i 142 1m 72%i 13 72% 9 100% 153 17%- S4 =9 11:00 °0% 9 50% 7 100% 253 G29G 134- 303 12.00 PM 61% 11 Gl% S 90% 138 SO% ,�160 317 100 50% 9 50% 9 90% 138 50% 51W 316 -2:00 44%. 8 44% 6 97% 148-: 617}a -.192 354 3:OD 44% 8 44% 6 97% 148` 619E 195 357 4:00 44% 8 44% 6 „ 77% 118 69% 221 353 5:00 22% 4 22% 3 47% U 45% 208 287 6;00 — — — 23% 35 65% 2D8 243 7.00 — _ 7% 11 — 11 9.00 - — — 7% 11 900 3% S 'S 10.00 3% 5 5 MOD — 1200 AM — — — — — — _ — — c i i MAMM M PARION0 DWAND.-337 aka at 3`,0D P&A Sour= Urban Land ImtituM ISUmd Pasi<ing;1567. Austin•Fo=AawdUM Idc.'Vh*iX Dare,Parking Stody;19P. IS Indoes RMU Mall 10 Austin-Foust A=cp'-lac 357 Table 6 -� Alternatfive 2 WEEICEtiD HOURLY ACCUMULATION OF PARKING INDOOR RETAIL MALL f}c i r OCCUPIED VACANT VACANT :.INIIOOR Net Hour INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL OFFICE p t t Of Day % Stnotss % Soaaes % Soap %�SEse� UVM 6:00 AM \11 &00 60% 16 16 + 9:00 - — _ W% 21 - 21 10:00 0 0, 0 0 m .21 20* 64 as I i 11:00 0 01 0- 0 100% 26 43 12-00 Phi 0 0 0 0 10(Y9& 26 70% 224 1:00 0.. 2 0 0 80% 21 .84% M 290 2:00 0 0 0 0 60% 16 100% 3'20 --336 3:00 0 0 0 0 40%' 10 9m 288 -za— _ 4:00 0 0 0° 0 40% 10 94% 301 311 5:00 0 0 0 0 M% s 90% 28C 293 s:ou _ 232 1.00" _ - _> _ 20% 5 — — 5 � — � — zos� s 1 — s 10.00 — — - , — — — — MOD AM MA' WJM PARKING DEMAND.336 spsm at 2m PAL Sou Url-an Lam ItWi=6",fisted PatlsW 1987 Atutip-Fo=AtmdettA Itbe,lv e;MLz Date Psticlaa Study;1939 6 �a ° Iadn�Reui!Agel7 IE Atadn-Fomt Awoastm Inc F—✓� t ,s TaN67 Altanatin 3 :WEEKDAY HOURLY ACCUMMATiO.I0SPARKI110 MDOOR REMIL MALL(1:150) OCCUPIED VACANT VACAN$ INDOOR Net Hour INDUSII:�41. MUSTRIAL OFFICE k'.rrA]L Parko6 Of Day _ Smas % Smaea % Staaev % ` Spam Demand 6:00 AM 3% 5 5 — 7:00 — — — 20% 31 31 —96 i1 9:00 93% 142 142 1&00 72% 13 725b -P 10D% 153 17% 118 293 I100 50% 9 50% 7 l0D% 153 42% zo 459 12M PH 61% 11 61% 8 90% 138 50% 346 $03 1:00 50% 9 50% 9 90% M3E 50% 30 SD2 200 44% 8 44% 6 97% 148 - 60% 415 s" 3.00' 44% D 4496 6 97% 148 61% 4= 584 4:00 "% 8 44% 6 77% i38 69% 4T 609 5.00 =% 4 22% 3 47% 72 tis% 440 528 23% 3S 65% 449 - 484 70D — — 7% 11 — — 11 B. 00 _ — 7% it — u 9:06 = — 3% 5 _ 5 10.0D 3% 5 5 11,00 AM — — — — v I:IAXIMIJM PARKING DEMAND 609 spa=at AIM PH- Soutcc Uta land im�tttam,"SL�ed Parkiaf"i98T. Atzufn•Foist ArndsioG.Iacr" Dace parthg Stt�14.1989. v� 7adoocRMO Malt , Zz kou -Faaat AuoastM I j� F-3.7 �i c Y; T Table 8 AMk ^ ARec K 3 WEEKEND HOURLY ACC61MUTAMON.OF PARX314G INDOOR RETAILMALL UASOj OCCUPIED, VACANT VACANT INDOOR Net Moue INDUSTRIAL MUSTRIAL, OFFICE RETAIL Packing OF Day % Soaees., ' spa, /I Sa:bn w Spam Dcmaad 6:00 AM — 7:00 - 20% 5 — 5 . &00 _ _ _ 80% 16 16 9:il0 _ 80% 21 u 10:00 0 0- 0,, Q am 21 20% 138 159 11..00 0 0 0 0 lOQ9fi,.., 26 63% 435 461 1200 PM 0 0 0 0 100% 26 70% 484 510 1:00 0 Of' 0 0 80% 21 FA% S80 601 200 0 r, 0 0 6056 16 Iws 6% 707 3.00 0 0' of 40% 10 90% 622 632 4:Oi1 0 0 0 0 40% 10 94% 650 660 5:00 0 0 0, 0 2D% S 90% 622 627 6:00 — — — 20% 5 71% 491 496 7:00 — _ 20% S 5 91.00 11:00' 1200 AM — — MAXIMUM PARKING DEMAND: 707 qwAm at 2 Ph Son= Urban Laud I=tk uM'Shared PutiW 1997. AuLan-F am AmodistoN Inn,`IVA&Dam Patting Study,101. ` vm j I Indow RMW Wall ; 13 Austin-Fount Aaao mm,Inc F-3F Y _ percent buffer which reduces the maximum allowable demand to 691 spaces. A parking ratio of 1:150 for th_ foposed project building plus the other site uses would exceed the city's allowable parking demand by 16 spaces However,cane studies indicate that a parking requirement between;3.1 and 5.1 would be sufiicent for tbR%proposed use The above findings indicate that providing for 691 parking spaces mill be adequate to se�,,Ve the anticipated perking demand for the proposed project and other site uses in a shared parld*- enviromnent Toe-analysis concludes that~ • Case studies indicate the Indoor Retail Mall would have a panic parking demand of 3.1 spaces per TSF for a total of 320 parking spaces. o Case studies indicate the industrial manousing use would have a Peale peaking demand of.5 spaces per TSF for a total of 18 parking spaces • The inclusion of an Indoor Retail.Mall and the vacact office and commereiaJlAight industrial uses would have parking wquiter;,�_ts at the immediate project site of 681 pa'ldng spaces. • The existing site presently provides for a total of 760 parking spaces. a The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires a 10 percent buffer to accommodate for unexpected fluctuations in parkingdemand andparking turnoverwhichwould provide for a peak parking demand for'the enth�center of 691 spaces. • The peak weekday parking demand for the site is 609(Attetaative 3,parkingfatio of 1.i:))spaces at 4-00 PM and the peat weekend parking demand is 707(Alternative 4� 3, parking ratio of 1:150) spaces at 7—M Plot based on U I guidelines and case studies. • Sufficient ava7abk parking is I>savided at the subject locaticm i Intkwr PvAd Rica` 14 t-ti3 Atudn•Fmt Aso4 Im Inca Traffic Oata'`Serviees, Inc. ter-- PARKING STUDY LOCATION: STANTON INDOOR SNAPNEET CITY:STANTON DATE: 5/17191 DAY: FRIDAY FILENAME:6412304A .— .. ..........................,........................ - Time SECTIONS I Period .- B.giig........ A 8 .0 0 ..E..................................G H TOT. 1 OF NARKED PARKING SPACES PER SECTION: 49 9 17 50 41 27 193 T:00 AM 7:30 AN 8:00 AN 8:10 AN 9:00 AM 9:30 AN 10:00 AN 3 0 2 3, 0 10 0 i 10:30 AM It:00 AN 9 5 la 10 0 13 0 45 11•30 AN 12:00 MOON 0 4 10 14 S 21 0 ' 54 12:30 Pit 1:00 PH 3 3 7 16 5 19 0 53 1:30 PM 2:00 PH 4 1, ^a 26 8 16 a 64 2:30 'PM 3t00 PM 3 3 Z% 29 2 21 0 65 r. 3:30 PM 4:00 PM 3 3 11 29 8 30 0 74 4:3D PH 5:00 PH 4' 2 11 32 4 17 0. 70 5:30 PH 6:00 PH 4 2 if 30 5 17 0 69 6:30 PM 7:00 PH jj 7:30 PM t; d .............................................................. ..... COMMENTS: SECTION 6 STREET PARKING ON FIRST ST Jl Traffic Oa4a Services, Inc. PARKING STUDY ;ti I u it LOCATION: STANTON INDOOR SNAPMEET CITY:S.TANTON ® DATE: 6129/91 10 DAY: REONESDAY FILEt1AHE:0412305A Time ..r SECTIONS. ..ri. .. ... Period Beginning A B C D E F G' H TOTAL ......... .... .. . ....r.....«......r ...r.r.................... do 8 OF MARKED PARKING SPACES PER SECTIOX: 49 9 17, 50 41 27 193 La 7:00 AN t� 7:30 AN ' 8:00 AN t. 8:30 AM 9.00 AM 9:30 AM = IO:00 AM 0 1 6 14 1 1 0 23 10:30 AN 11:00 AN 0' 2 5 14 z SI 0 40 11:30 AN 12:00 NOON 1 2 5 24 4 L 21 O„ 57 12:30 PH 1:00 PH 0 2 6 23 4 15 0 50 1:30 PH 2:00_PM 1 2 5 25 2 10 0 45 2:30 PM 1 3:00 PM 0 2 5 25 3 15 0 50 3.30 PH 4:00 PR 1 3_ a 25 3 9 0 49 4:30 PH 5:00 PH 0 2 7 26 2 10 0 47 6 e- iPH 0 2 7 22 3 S 0 42 6:30 PH 7:00 PM 7:30 PH' .............n.............................. .�..• Yso,.......a.................rarr.....r.. .{.-� COMMENTS: SECTION 6 @ STREET PARKIMG ON FIRSTST �t o rs J Traffic Data Services, Inc. PARKING STUDY LOCATION: STANTON INOOOR`SHAPMEET CIT":STANTON' DATE: 5/25/91 DAY: SATURDAY FFLENI:ME.0412306A — .... ............................. 0 r.. s..r..... ws ....... aw�.wwawww.r...so.w www f Time SECTIO,NS' Period' Beginning A 8 r� 0 E F C N ` ?OT1L .............................................. .. I Or MARKED PARKINS l SPACES PER SECTION: 49 9 17 50 41 27 c Iq3 7:00 AM F; 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 8:30 AM 9:00 _y AM 9:3' 4M ° �., 10:00 AN 0 0 4 14 2' 1 0 21 10:30 AN - r, 11:00 AN 3 i .0 §4. 7 12 0 67 is 1I:30 A14 IZs NOON 4 1 12 34 5" ,19 C 75. 1 .3t^ PM 2:01•'PH 8 2 11 33 16 f; "'20 0 90 1:30 PM 2:OP PM 6 5 10 36 25 25 0 107 2:,0 PM' 3.00 PN 8 3 10 34 19 22 O �:�� 96 -3:30 PM „ 4:00 PM 6 4 10 36 2Of, 24 0 100 4:30 PM 5:00 PM fi, 2 11 3B' f4., 23 0 96 5:30 PM 6:00 PM 6 3 10 ^i30 11 16 0 76 6:30 Pq- 7:00 PM 7:30 PM ................................ .................................................». COMMENTS: SECTION G STREET PARKING OW FIRST STNW ,• } .r�/Z i-1/2.5":.Fi $4 r. Q ` N).),a012 Oc- NJ - i r'xo V It l CAP ` , r f�-' 8i' yr l Traff1c Data Services, Inc. PARKING STUDY ,I LOCATION: N/W CORNER OF BUFFALO 5, 6TN ST CITY-• RANCHO am 18 -' .... DAT1me5'17C91 DAY: FRIDSECTIQNS FILENAME 4412 ...�.. Period Beginnig A C 0 „ E F G TQTAL ^\ .............................................. . r..'. e.Pi.... .................. \\\ t OF MARYE'3 PARKING ' SPACES PER; SECTION: 111 $1 90 185 356 0 •853 7:00 AM 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 80C AM 9:00 AM 9:30 AN 10.00 AM 0 0 it 1 1 0 13 10:30 AN I1:00 AM 0 p g 1 "p 0 gi y 11':30 AM JI I2:00 NOON 0 0 10 1 " 0 0 12:30 PH 1:00 ,PM 1 0 6 0 0 0 9 1:30 PH 2:00 PM 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 2.30 PH ! 3:00 PH 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 3:30 PH 4:00 PH 0 0 0 0 0' 0 4:30 PH S:00 PN 0 0 4 0 0 0 " 4 5:30 PH 6'00 PH t 0 O 0 0 0 0 6.30 PP, 7:00 PH 7:30 PH .. COMMENTS:' 011 Traffic Data ServVices Inc, _ PARKING ST!YDY ^� LOCATION: N/Y CORNER OF BUFFALO 8 6TH ST, CITY: RANCHO 4' DATE: 5/22191 DAY gEDNESDAY CUCAMONG A ...-^. FLENAME 0412302B.. ........ .. Time r • SECTIONS Period Beginning A B D E F 8 TOTAL .... .... ....................:....... .....v..�...... �......� S OF MARKcD PARKING SPACES PER SECTION: 111 91: 185 356 ZO 853 7:00 AM 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 8:30 AM 9:00 AM 9:30 AM IO:00 AM p 0 10:30 AM 8 0 2 0 IO 11:00 AM p 0, 11:30 AM C' 0 2 0 10 12:00 HOOK p p 1,:30 PM 2 0 10 O 1:00 PM p 1:30 PM 8 0 2 0 10 2:00 PH p p 2:50 PM 7 0 3:00 PM p 0 3:30.PM 4:00 PH 4:30 PH 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 5:00 PH 0 0 3 5:30 PM 0 0 0 3 6:00 PM 6:30 PH 0 0 0 t O 0 0 p 7:00 PH 7;30 PH f' .................. .......a...:,..................... .r.. COMMENTS: f, ze ,4 Aft ' Traffic Data Services. Inc. PARKIN6.STUDY t. LOCATION: N/M CORNER OF BUFFALO,& 6TH ST rr CITY: RANCHO I CUCAHORGA DATE:. 5/18191 DAY: SATURDAY` FILENAME 04123038 Time SECTIONS�- v � Perfad .:. Beginning A 8 G 0 E f 6 TOTAL ..7........................................ .. r................................. 5 :OF'MARKED PARKING SPACES PER SECTIONe 111 91 90 185 356 20 853 7:00 AN t� 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 8:30 AM 9:OO AM 9:30 AM 10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 AM II:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:"0 AM 12:00 MOON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' I2:30 P1i 1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 D .< 0 0 1:30 PM '> 2:D0 P'A 0 0" 0 �0 0 0 0 2:30 PM J.' 3:dQ PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r'1 3:30 PM 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 5:00` PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 5:;0 PM 6:00 PH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30' PH ^ 7:00 PH 7:30 PM Z, ...•.•........................a.........................i...i ........ COMMENTS: Cxlh1N N cio 3 1 fj �) Ya ) ) 3-1ftf1 ? r v � e,4 /y Fl � Traffic Data Services, Inc, PARKING STUDY LOCATION: S/E CORNER OF BUFFALO S 6TH ST CITY:RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 5117/91 DAY: -FRIDAY FILENANEa0412301C Time SECT"JIS period Beginning A 0 �� C 0 E F G H TOTAL_._ .y ............. 0 OF NARKED PARKING SPACES PER SECTION: 83 126 30 42 58 63 39 441 7;00 AN, 7:30 AN ` 8i00 AN 8.30 AN 9:00 AN 9:30.AN 10;"90 An 42 82 16 f 7 0 0 2 154 1030 AN 11:00 AN 45 64 16 3 7 0 0 0 156 I1:30 AN 12:00 NOON 39 68 17 4 S. 0 0 0 133 12:30 PM ;r 1:00 PH 34 SS 15 4 xr 4 0 0 fl 122' 1:30 PH f 2:00 PH 21 41 12 T. 4 4 0: 0 1 83 2:30 PH 3:00 PH 10 28 14 3 4 0 0 0 �Y) 3:30 PN �' 4:00 PH 9 24 4" 3 3 0 0 0 43 4,30 PN 5:00 PH 6 11 1 „ 3 2 0 0 fl'0 23 5:50 PH �f 6:00 PH 5 7 1 3 2 0 0l 0 18 6:3G PM rf 7:00 PH 7:30 PM ................................................................n.............. COMMENTS: SECTION N STREET PARKING AshL � = 4100 1.. fti Traffic Data Iq ServIcf.s, Inc.PARKING STUDY' 4 fT LOCATM: S/E CORNER OF BUFFALO fi 6TH St. CITY:RANCMO ;4 CMAMONGA DATE: ......1 DAY: WEDNESDAY �� FILENAME.0412302C Time SECTIONS Period Beginning' . A B C 0 E, '� F; -^ N TOTk" .....�. ............ .....o..«........... ..... .«.y .... :: ti...«... 3,,OF MARKED PARKING �i SPACES PER SECTION: 83 126 30 42 58� ';. 63 39 lr 441 7:00 IN t�.. 7:30 AM Jr, , 8:00 AN 8:30 AN 9.00 AM 9:30 AM i 10:00 AM 42 74 9 3 4 0 0 2 134 10:30 A14` 11):DO AM 50 6 10 3 4 0 0 S' 141 ' 11-30 -AM •Y 12:00 NOON 51 .57 9 3 4 0 0 3 129 11:31 PM 1:00 PM 33 45 13 3 4 0 0 6 104 1:30 PM 2:60 PM ,14 30 15 3 0 0 6 70 2:30 PH \' y 3:60 PH_ It 26 12 2 3 0 0 6 60 3:30 M 4:00 ?H `' 12 22 11 1 3 0 0 3 SZ 4:30 PK 5,00 Pet 12 19 9 ;1 ' 4 0 0 0 44 5:30 PM 6:00 PM IO 19 6 1 3 a 0 0 39 , 6:30 PM,, 7:00 PM: ,( 7:30 PH ' m.............................. -------- COMMENTS: SECTION N STREET' PARK,CN6 a, F—qol �7 J Traffic Data Services, Inc. FKRKINC STUDY" LOCATION: S/E CORNER'OF BUFFALO 6 6T.H ST CITY:RAHCNO CUCAMONGA DATE: 5/18f91 OAY SATUROAY F.�EN�h� 0412303C .............................. ........ Time SECTIONS Period Beginning 8 C D E P 6 H TOTAL . . OF MAR'KEO PARKING SPACES PER SECTION: 83 126 30 42 68 63 39 441 7:00 AN 7:30 AM -8:00 AN 8:30 AN 9:00 AM 9:30 AN' Aft I0:00 AN 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 10:30 AN 11:00 AN 0 p 1 0 0 O 0 0 1 11.30 AN 12:00 NOON 0 0 1 0 ' 0 0 0 0 i 12:30 PH 1:00 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:30 PH 2:00 PH 0 0 1 :' 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:30 PN — 3:00 PH ;', O 3:30 PH 4:00.PH 0 0 1 O " 0 0 0 0 1 4 30' i:N, 5:00 PM`- 0 0 v _i { 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 5:30 PM fi:00 PH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I 6:30 PM r 7:00 PH 7:30 ON ti ..a.:.p:..................-..;...................... ................:: =r CONNENTS: ,..................... • s •SECTIONN ■�ITREET PARKING THERE WAS ONE CAR (A SECURITY GUARD) AR,-D N S R THROUGH � P ,4 AND SITTING IfS CA SHR G ENTIRE COUNT F-5'o 4 rl l f t� Ira- r ,; r v < r Ask Traffic Data, Services, Int. ` PAR-[PSG STUDY LOCATION: PIER 1 IMPORTS DISTRIBUTION CEWTER CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA BASE: S/17/91 DAY: FRIDAY FIIE NAM E• r9412�01A ..................... .�..................... . Time \i SECTIONS y Period Beginning P *"\ 8 C 0 E F G TOTAL ...... :..........................,.......................11 ..... f. F OF MARKED............... PARKING; S?ACES PER SECTION: 1B4 184 7:00 AM 7:3 0 AN 8:00 AM 0:30 AM 9:00 AM 4:30 AM ;> 10:00 AM 26 J 26 10:30 AM 11:00 AM 2 25 11.30 AM 12:00 NOON 96 26 12:30 PM 1:00 PM 20 20 1:30 PM 2:DO' Pm j; 26, 26' 2:30 PM 3:00 PN 24 24 3:30 Pk' 4:OO PM 3 4:30 PM 5:00 PM 5:30 Pia 6.00 P,D? 6:30 Pri 7:00 PM 7.30 PM ..........................................'+.......... tea......................... COMMENTS: LA. � 4:« Traffic Data Serric." Ine. PARKING STUDY f LOCATION: PIER IMPORTS DISTRIBUTION CENTER CITY: ,RANCHO CUCAMONGA OATS: 5/22/91 DAY: WEO ESDAY FILENAME: 041V�02A ..................................................... .... ........ ....,o...«. Time ii SECTIONS ANY Period 8sginning A 8 C 0 E F' 6 TOTAL t OF NARKED PARKING �- SPACES :PER SECTION: 184 ' 184 7:00 AN 7:30 AN 8:00 AN 8:30 AM 4:00 AM 900 AP) 0 AN 45 45 O AM I1:00 AM 39 \{ 39 11:30 AN 12:00 "DON 40 titi 40 12:30 PH 40 40 2 i.00 PM 49 / 49 2a30 PM 3:00 PM 46 46 3:30 PM 4:00 Ph 2 2 4:30 ON i( S•00 PH 1 I 5:30 PM 6:00 PM 1 1 6:30 PM - 4p 7:00 On 7:30 PH ....................... . .. F..: CONVENTS: L �C �A 1 F -s P . Traffic Data Services, Inc. PARKING STUDS LOCATION: PIER I IMP0RT5 D:YSTRFBUTION CENTER LITY: RANCHO EUCAMONGA DATE: 5118f91 DAY: SATURDAY FILENAME 0412303F, T • .. ..... ....................................... .... . . Time Period Beginning 4 8 C\�_ 0 E F, G TOTAL ............................................ ... _ -••-_-_ -_ �.__! OF MARKED PARKIN6' �_ , } -._ SPACES PER SECTION: 184 184,' 7:00 AM =,i} 8: 0 AM :00 AN 8:"! AN 9:00 AM 9:30 AM IO':0O AM 0 0 10:30 AM 1 11:00 AA 0 0 ? ' 11:300 44 12:00 NOON 0- D 12:30 PM .. 1:00 PM 0 0 1:30 PM 200 PM 0 D 2:30 PM 3:00 PM 0 ; 0 3:30.PM 4:0 i' p 0 S,.,0 PM 0 p 5:30 PM 6:00 PM 0 p 6:30 PM 7.00 PM x Y:30 PM •.. •••..•'w.• •.-.......•.•........... ............................................... .......................... _._.. COMMENTS: ; F k tttl ;rar `S� On VC J _ ;. IQ. G�pry R �3 Table A-A J Vd1E8MAY ✓ HOURL-Y ACCUMULATION OF PARKIIIG INDOOR RETAIL TIAI.L(1:100). ti OCCUPIED VACANT VACANT IN11tlt4R Net r Hour INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL•;= _ OFFICE P&` iL Parking , Smas �n Soccxs % 5naca. °6 s0ho s Demand 6:00 AM, 3% — �5 5 7:00 2D% g1 J1 P.00. — — — 63%Z 56 — 46„ 142 142 10.00 72%' 13 72% —9, IPA% _ ,135 17% 7 y 1100 50% 9 50% \? 100% IS 42% 435 604 12:00 PM 61% 11 61%. 4Vis.' 138 50% 51E 67S 1:S 0 SO% 9-, SD% 9 9096 ' 138 56. 518,, 674' 2:O1* 44 $ 44$ 6 97% 748 6096 622 78S0 3:00 4496' 3: 44% 6 ` 97% 148 61'a':', 632 794"0' 4:00 44.%. 8:: 44%' 6 .'.77% IMI- `69% 71S 7,73*" 5:00 22%u # 271. 3" %.47% L;r 65°ro 673 7n 6.00 / 2.3°�fi. 35 6_S:fi -"6Z. �708- &..00 9.00 — 3% — 5 5 11:00 77 ,y 12:00 AM 1�i+flldUMPt=Y�fGDEtv1ANi-`794 spaces at3.tt0PM Source: Urban Laud Inat:tutL- Aired Parking;2987. AustimFinat Associates Inc."4 rglnia Dace Parking Study,,1959. 'Exceeds tbm-hold of availawtcc parking mia:n 1096 buffer' ••Fxc=&existing available on-site patkLV _ f G � Table A 2, s iMEEKEND # / HOURLY ACCI MUi.AMON OF FAR G _INDOOR'RETAIL MALL(1:100): l �� tzf OCCJPIEI? VACANT VACANT Net Hour IK'IW, :IIAI i� INDUSFRIAL OFFICE BEIAiL' : Parkins OfDav 'lo' S`aacas 9G Snvoes % Sams Tcrosad ` 6:00 AM _ L 7:00 8:00 _ 6t1 - 16 9:00 21 Y• 2c T; 1400 21 -20% 207; 22S t°' 11:00 0 o o`, 0 lw%. 2$' 63% 253 12:00 FM 0' o o 0 IoDq , 2b 7046` -TL5 75�.' 7 1.00 0 a� 0 0 80°fs 21 _t $4°G 870 991•" 2.00 0 0 0' �o 60`X 16 'r I00% :10 6 ,� ��1052$$ 3:00 0,, o o,'..:; 0` " 10 "% 932 ;r a�q2.• (_ 4:00- 0. 0` )I- '0 0 10" ' '9490 .7-.➢74 (< 984.. 5:00 0 0 0 0 20 1( 90% ' 93-c^k 937•- 6OG _ — 24% 5 71% 130 741 7:00 2055 5 5 8 00 2M 3 ,' 9.00 r 1I.00 1200 AM MAX22AUbl YARXMG DaAAND; 105Z'spo=at 2:30 PM Som= Urban landliWtitute"Shire3Ptking I48'l- Ac-st[n-Fouu Asuiaater,In-:,"Vug'vlia Dare Parkia�Siu:fy":::989. jOl•.SDCCd4 t111CS1Wld OI 3Yi.1i65C patting IDlLualO�i buSe>?- � f t saEeceeds erstrog available or-site parking 7. t , i t. f� RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN *REC ORDED MAIL TO: GITY OP STENTON,-BUFFALO PARTN"ERS._' C/o Mission Ectlst�� , 8202 Cabot Road, 'S to 200 e•q �jd f Zaguna Niguel, CA 92677 Attn: Richard Gtentor DECLARA7.'ON OF RESTRICTIONS GRANT OF"EA.e-E�ZLNTS..AND p3AINTt�NCE AGREEMENT I I tr THY$ DECLARATION OF RiS,kRICTION5, G}.ANT. OF EAgEMWi S AND Mp,TNTENANCE .AG&^ MENT ("Dec,taraticsr,") is madL tl ;.s day of lam. ���s ", 1990, by SM1 14TON BU EA=' PARTNEF..S, a California Fart:n,,:-ship ("Declarantj.'j. RECIT`A,-LS• A. hleelarant is owner of of twin {eal property situate tn the �:ity of Rancho Cucamonga; ounty0of San Bernardin a.e of California as ,*6re artic��larly described in hib?h " tc:. as Decla'ratiC-i ("Cove ed Prop"' This Declarafian is b ,fmposed by Deci an upon the Covered Property. B. T)eCiarcTl'de., s i` aesirable to establ sh certain covenants, conditian3, fade s, and'`restrict 6,ns,upon the cosrwT_d Property and each d very :port' in thereof, ,whit' gill constitute a general ":2a a for .e:=management anA dsvel.op66nt on an integrated, basis of i.a Covered rop�r!�y, and' for the use, ­:..;.upattcy a-•a enj oym t thereof, alley-`the purpose ;of enhancing -and. prote•_ '_•ng the slue, ciesirabily ',act a�ttractivzness of the ; Covered _z�perty enhancing the goal �f the izaprovements 'within the Cove d Property. C, eclarant will hereafter hold an ranvey title to al.t of the vered Property subject to certain 'otect-ive J covenants, onditions, easements and restric�.ionsireafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant hereby tovenaints an declares ' thzt a 1 of its interest, as the same may frzm �r'ime:to e appe in the Covered Property, shal.�be held and convexF� AW , - J booF and no outdoor storage --hall be permitted at•any time within the covered Property, The Approving°Agent shall have the absW.ut�,right to a.,evoke ita consent previously granted t3 an .outdooc user, if in the Approving Agent's judgment, suer •user is,violating the terms and conditions upon which su- t consent was givan.. (b) Operations and uses that are neither spec I;fically prohibited nor �5'Pecl fically authorized by this Decla"ation may be Pe--mitted in specific cases if such uses are in compliance wi:h applicable law and if written: operational 'plans and specifications for such operas;' ons or uses, and suc2: other info•,tmation as may be,requested by; the Approving Agent,,,_are _submitted to andapproved in writing by the Approving Agent, in its sole: discretion, which approval Shall be based upon its analysis of the,anticipated,effect of such operations o-.,uses'upon other foots, upon other uses within the &*,Vered Property and upon x ','her real property in 'the vicinity of the Covered Property,, ' (c) No business operation shall be performed or c.ar: ied in such a nanner'that such;operation or use in the judgement 7 9' nt 7f the Approving Agent' -'is nr;,shall become ari, annoyance or nuisance`t6 othe_ portions of the Covered Property or other. Owners or Occupants,„or which shall in any way interfere w :th the quiet enjoyment enjoyment by each of the owners and ticcuparits �;f a Lot,, or which shall.'in any way increase the rate of insurance fot any Lot or any . portion of the Maintenance Area. In t2akr",regard, 'there shall not be permitted any junk or salve yar ,, or any other use which may be Offensive to the neighbor,'aood by reason of odor, fumes, dust, smoke, noise,, glare, heat =-sound, vibration, elec*' omechanical disturbances, electromagnetic disturbances, raLiation, air or water pollution or which"may ;be hazardous by reason o',danger of 'tire. or "explos, on. Nc use c.: a Lot sh!.il be permitted which will result in the discharge of toxic-matters into any sewer system or sfiorm drain serving the Lot or the Projp >ts i (d) There shall be mrdr':ained on each Lrt only I Buildings, paved.walks, paved parkinq' ats, paved 'uriveways, lawns, landscaping and-- util ty improvements or any other improvements which has been approved by the Approving Agent in writing, the. construction and/or installation of Which' shall be Subject to the approval at the Approving Agent in accordance with the provisions of,'this 'Dec laration dCd provi . however, that the surface of the regiiiied set-back from any: txisting or future public street a:d external property lines i of each ?Lot shall be used e?iclusiv)'iiiy for lawns, landscaping, t calks an3 driveways, which mpsavttments' and 'landscaping mus;be approved in writing by the. Approving Agent. _7- (e) The Operator may now or hereafter construc-t erect, maintain, replace and change Project identificationAsk signs upon the Covered Property, provided that such action shall not unduly ir,terfera with`.an Owner's or its Occupants's c: use of its Lot. Section 2.02 Loading Areas. There shall be maintained on each Lot facilities for ,loadinq and unloading su ;icientlto serve the business conducted thereon with using the adjacent, street therefor. Loadina Mocks shall beset back and scree,ped, to minimized the visual..,effect from external public streets and neighboring Buildings, and :rust be-located at the rear or silde of a Building (excluding the side of a Euilding facing a public ,'.street) unless the Approving Agent consents in writing to another location. Section 2.03 Screening of Storage Areas Unless' ` specifically approved in writ ing by-the Approving Agent,;,no materials, supplies, inventory, equipment 'or any other personal property shall be stored on any. portion of' a Lot except inside a Building or behind a masonry block wall 'barrier, which barrier shall be a Least eight (8) feet in height (but .not in e)ecess of said height wt.hout; the prior written permission of the Approving Agent), and which barrier screens such area from the view of " ad?-in,:ng portions of the Covered Property and/or the public streets. In no event shall any material.; or equipment be store3 in said storage pare ' to a height ;greater than eight (a) feet, Ash All roof-mounted.mdhanical equipment, utility; nstallations, duct work, radio or television ant-nna or any other devices which project vertically a.or:�.,than cne and`one-half (1-1/2)_ feet above the roof or roof parapet shrill be scre;:nec by a'visual barrier cf a neutral color which is detailed consistent with the Building and.has been approved in writing b the Approving Agent, Section 2 4i Signs. No xterior signs of any type whict normally would be visible from the neighboring nzoperties or public streets shall be placed or waintained'on any Lot or Building unless the %ame 'shall have been first approved in writing by the'Approvi:ng Agent. Said approval shall not be unreasonably withhold provided :%at plans for the.,72rnposed sign or signs and the location same on the Lot bs Huild .ng are subiiiitted to the Approving Agent and,the Approving Agent determines that the desa�I type ar,d_location conform to 'any sign standards as :nay be than'odtablished by the Approving Agent and in effect with respect to th- Covered Property. Section 2.-- No-di.fication of Vrades. Unless specifically approved in writing, by the Approving Agent, the grade of any Lot shall not be modified, altered or otherwise changed. Section 2.06 Subdivision. Unless specifically approved. �-- 1 instrument appointing an Architectural Committee and the members thereto who shalt_ replace and assume all of the' rights, powers and reservations of Approving:Agent as set forth in this Declaration.- Upon the recordation of any such` instrument�- described in this Paragraph 2 H3, the rights, powers and reservations of the Approving Agent contained, in this Declaration shall vest in said Architectural Committee, and the Approving Agent's duties and 'obligations•with I.,-espec't thereto shall terminate. At any time and from tin e. ::o time after recordation of such instrument by Declara4 and Tj-rovided Declarant noglong_r is an Owner of a Lot, a Majority a,fy'Owners cf the Covered Property by execution, acknowledgement and r=cordation of,an amendment thereto, may appoin.u, new members to the Architectural Committee, remove members the-refrom, and may alter any procedural rules provided therefor. Section 2 ,14 Compli_anct sd'it.'°1 Governmental Regulations._ Nothing herein contained shall be,deemed to . constitute approval !^f any use which is nconsstenti with any applicable,governmento. rules, requiremEnts, regulations, L'e.5tr1 Lions or o':dinances. l� Section 2.15 Use of'Parkiac Area, Vehicular parking in tha Parking Area on the Gavered Property shall be perititted only in designated parking stalls. No portion-of the Parking Area shall be used for repair, storage.I,cr overnight ;Larking of automobiles. The Operator shall have the right t'c institute reasonable, nondiscr,.iminatory.rules a'nd regulaticjns for the use and operation of the Parking Area in odes to assure the free flow of traffic throughout the Covered Property within the traffic circulation patterns established from"time to time upon the Covered Property. No_'Owner or Occupant shall use or permit the Parking Area to be used in a manner which would interfere with the fee flow of vehicular and pedestrian traffic throughout the Covered Property; provided,; however, that nothing hey,,--in prohibit any Owner from fbrther improving, usig orrr grantinm easements -over.,its Lot fOr lawful purposes, including without limit than, construction of permanent structures and the creation Of utility_easements and installations, provided sueh' impr-vements, uses or easements do not substantial'ly 'restri,,t the rights of :ingress, egress and traffic ci_tcUlation establisrased herein, are in accordance with the applicable provisions of this Agreement ;fincluding, without limitations, 2.09- hereof)r and are in compliance with the requirements 'of the City, Each Lot is- to be all:,cated a specific number of vehicular parking stalls that, sha l be availale for use to the Owner of that dot on a nona exclusive basis. This allocation. shall be asi,follows: Lot 11 two hundred eleven (211) stalls; ot_2, seventy" five (75) stalls; Lot i, sixty-nine (69) stalls; Lot 4, four hundred and sixteen (415) stalls. Each 'Owner shall request that its av�its, employeesd' independent contractc.6-s and inArVzees use the parking ' stalls and driveway(s) located.-on its respective Lot.` :13- , e Section 2.16 Unobstructed Side and. No building or `, other structure, on the: Covered Property- may: be built, erected or constructed within thirty (30) feet'14on 'either side of the Lot line separating said ]got 1 and Lot A, as the: same may:exist fj ppm time to time. Said unobstructed `sideyard,. which,4s depict,3d on the Site,Pian, shall he maintained as, provided for in this section unless and until the City shall provide its express > written permission to mod;.fy said restriction. said unobstructea l sideyards shall be maintained unless and until the City shall l provide its express written perm Asion tc,,-modify said sideyard re.rmirements. 4 _ stzction 2.17 Party Hall. In .no event shall the Ownerof the Bis'< ing on Lot 3 or the Owner of the Building on Lot 2 materially'":amend,. modify or alter thelparty wall separating said BuiidinS..an Lot 3 and Building cn Lot 2 so as to reduce its function as a fire separation without the prior, express written permission or the City 2iRTICLE IT.-I MAINTENANCE AN;s INSURANCE Section 3.01 Owner's Duties— Each Owner shall maintain in good order, repair and i1-77ME=cn ali fence, walls or other structures, the exterior cf all Buildings an d any other improvements, all exteriorBuil.dirg lighting, all exterior signs and all other areas located on suc:9 Owner's Lot in a first class condi tion, but excluding those portions of the Maintenance Area located within such owner's Lot which area the Operator is obligated to maintain pursuant to Section 3.04 of this Declaration. All repairs shall be at least of equip ,,Lent quality and design as the original ;,ork. All windows and exterior surfaces of any Building or'-Any other improvements shall be washed, and cleaned regularly. All trash and rubbish shall be kept in enclosed containers in the location and manner provided for by the Approving Agent. Section 3.Q2'Storage Areas, Each owner and its Occupants shall be prohib-tad from storing anythinq. on its respective Lot, other than within a Build•€ng, unless the storage structure is approved by Approving Agent`car. tho Architectural Committee pursuant to. Articla 11 of this Declaration. Any approved exterior storage structure shall be shielded from public view with proper matersals to be of such duality as_may be required by nny Architectural and Landscape :St,Bndaras promui.gated by Approving Agent or by Architwectural Committee., section 3.03 Destruction of Owner? Ftuildina a' Other Structures. : If any Building or other wFrueture located 'En an Owner'r Lot is destroyed by any ,.casualtl+, the .a)wner of such") Lot -14- F-6 L `fr jL orderly and safe condition and in such a ,manner as to prevent AML erosion or sliding problems and,to facilitate the orderly discharge of water throughout the drainage systems and patterns-- established from time,to time upon',-the Co%:ered-Property. Nothing herein mall prevent an Owner of a Lot from relocating the drainage patterns established upon =uch Owner's< Lot provided such relocation does•.not unreasonably interfere fai n th, or increase the burden of, drain ge'from or •onto other Lots within the.Coxered Property, or interfere with the orderly discharge of water by means of same. Section 4.04 Easements for Utilities. There is hereby reserved to the DAclarant, together;with-the right and obligation to grant and transfer the same, nonexclusive easements over the Cowered Property for the installation and maintenance of electric, telephone, cable television, water, gas, sanitary sewer dines and drainage facilities as reasonably necessary;:to service each of the Lots. Said easement and reservation shall include the right of each Owner to enter upon the Lots owned by others or to have utility companies enter upon such. Lots in or ,upon' which such utilities, connections, lines or facilities or any poitiol thareof lie, to repair, replace and gene ral?f maintain said connections, lines or facilities as and when the same may be necessary; provided, however, that each such Owner or utility company shall exercise care and consideration in so entering upon another Owner's Lot so as, not to interfere,wit),,the use and enjoyment of same by the Owner and its Occupant and shall AM Promptly repair any damage to any Lot caused by such entry as promptly as possible after completion of the work. -Nothing herein shall prev1.ent any Owner of a Lot fron relocating any installations or other facilities uprn its Lot, at its sole cost and expense, provided such relocatioa doea''not interfere with tha use and enjoyment of such installations and facilities by the Owners of Lots within the Covered. Property served thereby. Each i owner shall be entitled to utilize tha surface of the ;property in or upon which utilities, :connections, lines or facilities l.;e for paving and landscaping purposes, and may construct permanent' I structures upon said property provided said Owner relocates s)irh utilities, connections, lines or facilities at its sole cost ai,d expense. Section 4,05 Easement for %naress EQtress and Traffic Circulation. neelarant hereby reserves to =t-.�self, together with the right and obli anon to g grant .and transfer same to Owners of Lots within Vie Cowered Pr nperty, honexclusive _aswments of ingress and egIress over and -�!jFon the designated traffic circulation patterns as deplCted-,on the Site Plan .for the purpssas of vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress and traffic c reu scion to oind thrpulhout,ths Covered Property; provided, howevar, that nothing h;erai i shal], prohibit any owner (otfroheru than improving, using or,granting easements over it:: Lot r (other than portions thereof comprising the, Parking Area) for any t' lawful purposes, inclu#ing without limitat on, construction of permanent structure an3 the creation of 'utility easements and AOL installati+ans, provided such improvements, uses or easemev,ts�',do not substantially restrict the rights of ingress, egress iiaa traffic circulation established herein and are in compliance with the requ rementsi-af the city. a : Section 4.06 Dominant and Servient•.F-state,:: Each easement granted or reserved pursuant to the provisions hereof is expressly for the benefit of each Lot and the Lot so benefited shall be the dominant estate and the Lot upon which each such easement is located shall be the servient estate and each such easement shall run with the land and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of tb_ Declarant. ]'R.TYCLE V COVENANT FOR tAYIXENT OF COMMON EIZPEKY ES Section 5.01 Covenant for Payment of Common_ Expenses. On or be�cre sixty (60) days prior to the beginning of each calendar year, Operator shall endeavor to deliver to- each Maier and Estimated Budget of Regular Assessments and Exclusive F.ssessments which estimates the Total Common Expenses and Exclusive Rssts_ments ta.be incurred for such year and each Owner's share of same. Each Owner shall pay to Operator, within twenty (20) days of'7perator's delivery of the Estimated Budget, o 0? fourth (1/4) of: each Owner's Regular Assessment and, Exclusive Asa;:-,;sment. On the first day of April, July a.Yd October thereafter, each Owner shall pay one`- fourth (1/4) of such Owneir's Regular A,ssessment'and Exclusive Assessment as provided for in the Estimated Budget. If no Estimated Budget is delivered to theOwners, the Estimated Budget for-'the prior year shall be deemd the Estimated Budg4,'� for tha current year until such time as a, _ revised Estimated Budget is make available.. The failure of Operator to timely prepare axtd deliver the Estimated Budget shall not const.,tute a waiver by Operator of its rights hereunder or of the ,�equir:ment that each Owner pay Assessments required hereby. Section 5.02 Ca"culation of Regular and Exclusive Assessments.. For purportun of this Uecla;ration, an Owner's share , of Regular Assessments o'hall be calculated by multiplying any aild all Common Expenses,sho,in on the Estimated 7udget times a fraction, the numeratDr,;of whi h shall be the square 'footage of the gross floor area under roof,., excluding overhang, of the. Building within such Ow;ier's Lot, and the deriaininator of"which shall be the sum of the, square footage of t�sef„gross floor areas � 4 under- roof, excluding overhang, of all Build-`- within the covered Property, If a Building has been destroyed, the ownerfs share of Regular Assessments shall be calculated based upon the._ : ADID&UM To LFMI3 DXTED PARCH 1,19997. - (1Y AND BETREEN R'1'FWGN40'TALE PAR'1MRs, LBESOR ABED WESTICOU, INCQRP. LEBBEH 49.;A, SC88DULS Of yS:dT Addil saUARE FOCTAGE oCCUVIED: Pursuant to contingency pericd and any-extension of the o,�ntingency period as provided herein, the Schedule of Pent and corresponding square footage occupied shall be as follows: ;• i t i $0. Pursuant to Paragraph.49 above, Lessee shall Tease- agaproximately h �. AO Or . 1 511 PAMING3 ''Adeguatcg 'free and in commab parking.for Retail Use Weekends, as described in the Xaninq Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lessor is aware Losses may need some use of the parking an Fridays, late in the day. All parties agree to use Best'Efforts to accommodate this weed; Subject to mutual approval by Buyer nud seller of parking prior to commencement date.` TERANT =PRO S8 Lessee to install at Lessees cost the folloiaing items: Aestrocas, Lighting, Floor Drains, Adequate Air Conditioning and: Electric as pee .city code requirements ffir Lessee's intendkId indoor retail' sales t:ie, however, Leagor agrees 'to provide 'a3equata power, sewer,-and-gam service yo a mutually acceptable location in the Leased p ,•emises Loc€.tion to be specified' and mutually agreed -to by both parties prior to February 1, 1991. F- CHARtESI,A.WEST GEORGE A.KUYKENDA 9E11 SAN HERNAR0INO RO • C6'AMONGA _J LW 9:t730-Pa3R a P O BOX 53e • 714 96T:��\� -' T.E..SQ6l6EN6ERGER. 1, ` RORERT NEUFELD March 18, 1991 '} JEROME M.WILSON fJ JEFFREY A.CAR'Fm MAR19199f"- City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California, 191729 Attention: Anna-Lisa Hernandez Re: Conditional Use Permit 91-03 Gentlemen: The Cucamonga County Water District'has received; znd reviewed the submittal package for the referenced subject. xh prctigosed site for this project has both sewer and water service `.erailable .from this District. The existing building proposed for this project` l�as ,to 4 inch sewer service laterals that are,"tied if,to a 6 inc a ( ;site sewer- line. A wasp--;water survey will"be required during Ian =heck to , determine pretreatment requirements, and any addit•_dnal sewer development. fees that may be required. The building is supplied with water by a 2 inch service_:line that is fed by a 2 inch meter., In addition to servicing this bi3i ding, the meter also services l'ao other buit1dings-1 Th3 Distr.act,"re- quires that the existing building +M.'tposed for this pro jeci .be solely supplied with water by o a,pa'tate ieter.. If ou have any y questions_ccncerning this matter, please contact the undersigned. r Yours truly, y CUCAMOHGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Richard J. Oaxaca Engineering Technician f RJO•b Q� RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE 1-AOTGCTIOIV DISTRICT Past O[Hiis BOX 9W,Rsecha Cucamonga,ta'Afomia 917014JM,(714)967.MS - March 14, 1991 t James Page, President " Westicorp Incorporated 1:643 Sherman 'Way, Suite 500 0 Van Nuys, CA 91406 Dear Mr.l Pe-ge: It is always refreshing to see an innovative idea put into action, and such is the case of your particular proposal. The Fire District has several concerns- which encompass the life safety of the intended customers and merchants.whom would visit the proposed Mini-Mall. The building in which you are wanting to use was originally designed as ri warehouse or a high-pile storage facility. Thi.s imposes a multitude of Oallenges for anyone wanting.to change the occupancy use to an assembly type use or an indoor exhibit hall..; The following items are examples of what would be expected in an anticipated ccapancy change: 1. Allowable `constructiori' for a Group A, Division 2.1 occupancy' (Assembly with greater than 300 occupants). Type V-1 hour construction (existing consti,uction Type V-Nonrated) 2. Number of Exits required: -1000 or more occupants (4 Exits required which are as remotely located from each other as possible), 3. Required Exit Width? Occupant load.6,Vided by 30 138 feet of total exit with (standard door 4' to '' therefore, 3' doors needed 46, 4' doors needed 35). 4. Required Interior Finishes. Class II flame spread (plywood finishes --t-t Class III or greater). >� F3I t`'` 67 JamsPresident Pag e, gjY ` Wcst!�Forr-Tnccrporated , 11 Pageh2,&A -The above noted items are only a few of the many issues that4 11 be'addresk3ed-, „ Prior to approval of a Conditional Usk Permit and occupancy of the proposed building. A. this point; I can only recommend that your Architectyral firm. 4 should provide an in-depth' study of the pvact cal use of this building for t your proposed occupancy It is the, sition of the Rancho Cucamonga Ffa*e P,rotecticn District to assist any occupant and/or builder to provide a reasonably safe environment for the occupants of: any given structure or use, if you have any questions_regardinj' your project, feel fr�?a to contact me at (114) 989-1863, extension U42; Sincerely, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, t r.• on Nee Fire Safe'..-,,Analyst RN:kes ) - -. fir' �,t • May 10. 1991 Carnival Mall Mr. James Pane, Partner 1d643 Sherman Way, Ste. 500 0, Nuys, CA 91406 SUBJECT: PROPOSED rARN1VAL MALL, 1I539 5711 STREET ^iar Mr. Page, This letter is intended to address the issues raised during our meting "of April 29, 1991. We believe that if the following:oncerns are.rl^operly, ; designed or p*ovided for,your project should have little difficulty -eceiving a building pelnit. 1. Interior partition height tR.not exceed 5'-90. Partitions in excess of 5'"-90 will be construed as forming a corridor thereby necessitating. compliancE to all culridor construction requirements. l 2. Location of all existing fire department accr;;s doors-must; be sho"Wn on the plans, Also, a;l exit requirements, with sp.ecif`-- attention giv&,;:to path and distance „f travel, hardware, signage and'ex illumination, "to be clearly depicted or. the plans. 3. All non-emergent, signage may hang no closer then-q''rro&`the floor. This + is intended to provV� i cloar line of "sigh, occupants to the nearest exit. Non erg>vgency signage may not pratrule into. or hang across required exit ways. 4. All exit signage and 0 'gancy illumination must`hang below non- emergency-signage and not l "s�� `& . i' from the floor.* 5. The "Kiddie Lando army must meet all State five Marshal requirements, snecifica:lly that myth disnllows professional (or staff) Gipsrvisioc, of children. As discex;irad, supervision of children must rrmain the retoonsibiiity of U,,,s,parent or adult guardian. Staff s-lopervision,may ` result in an ock:upancy group change, T 4 Mayoc Cretmts L 3kwt Councius> ,Dim*Wilk ns � Mayor Pro-Tem Wiliam J.Alexander, '" Councilmernber Pamaata J.Wtignt �} Jack lam 'OCP.City tv9ana ,t' �'' Counc'sls+enrGer-G"9ii�s J.Btsquat ' 1 t- 10500 Cmc center Otnre e PO Ec,%07 • {Pane Cuc�arrrrionW.Cq 911W c (714)980.185 'l c:: C Q7Q1- 2 JUNK 2,6 19 P.. A END Carnival Malls May JOr.1991 Page.2 - ASIL 6. A heat detection system with manual pull stations and visual indicators , will be required.' �r 7. The fcllowing inforn'sation must be provided on construction plans prior to submittal for plan review: j A. Occupant load.analysis based upon the values for "Stores-Retail Sales Rooms, Ground floor per Table 33-A of the Uniform Guilding Code as adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. B. Sprinkler system head temperature for the existing system. C. Layout of the existing draft curtains. 8. All provisions of the Uniform tides and the National Electrical Code, as adopted by the City of Rancho C'.,camonga, must be provided for prior to plan submittal. Separate plan check submittals will be required for the structure,;:electrical and fire protection systems. After careful review of your proposal, presuming all above items are adequately provided for and provided further thra no significant design , changes are made, we believe the occupancy group,4assification will Est closely, fa represent that of a retail sales cil'it,-thereby allowing e1-2 classification. "! 1 believe we have now provided the necessary c;�djaIfir:ation for you to proceed Aft through the design review process. 1f I can be of a�,y further assistance, :-' please feel free to call-. Sincerely, COMMUNITY 6iVELOPMUT DEPARTMENT f Building and Safety division Jer y R. Gran ilding Official James A. art Jr, P 1 an. Check Co®rdinator cc: Carnival Malls Mr. Deran Malian; Partner 15643 Sherman Way, Ste. 500 Van Nuys, CA 91406 Rennacker Design Group Mr. Richard L. REnnacker, Architect' P.O. Box 642 Northridge, CA 91328 �t f -70 ��Carnival Mla11s May 10 ;1991 Page 3 4 Lee b Associates ' Mr Rand Clouse,"dice Presid�nt 10370 ConunPrce Center Dr., ,Ste. 100 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 [ Anna Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planners Ron Nee, Fire Preventio6 Analyst, •RCFPD G 'Sdh►� Thomas, Semior flans EY'adiner, Fire Protection - — r' �, rt 1'I t, rj i ImMission,andompany citr Cr RANCHO CUCA%gjK'. June 4, 1991 A,4 JtN 7 �, �t81�d�1�t=�112j3i�d5i� A Ms. Ara Lisa Hernandez Assistant: Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Ms. Hernandez: Mission LandCompany lias bean advised that`the Planning Commission will consider on June 12, 1991 a Conditional use Permit to establish a "mini-ma311" (swap mest) ��in a leased space, Within an existing industrial center, located across Sixth Street - from our Mission Business Center. We hereby express our concern and-,�=s proposed use. pleasure witlijsuch a Mission Land has cooperated with 11 `a �'ity�Bc desires for upgraded architecture and landscaping wi1•.hih,."o'ur Center. We have b:en denied approval of tenants'{that;the City determined were hot in keeping with the high standards -Jf,,tthe Industrial Park;%one'. The result has bean that, although the page of development has suffered the quality bas been very high. ;< To contemplate the traffic, refuse and potential for increased crime, which the.propcsad indoor swap meet may generate, is distressful such a use is not appropriate to;an area with the potential to become one of the finesL industrial deveiopments`in California. we therefore request that conditional Use Permit 9i-`03, for an indoor swap moot at 11530 Sixth Street, be denied. Sincerely ohn ,R. Richards Manager, ]ngineering and Construction JR€.11l/)mf 1150 West Central Avenue,Suite D + Brea,California 92,31- • Talepho ®(71d)671.0466' i1' FAX V14)671.0632 -jZ T RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF"'THE r PLANNING COMMISSIOP OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITtONAL4+USE PEPRICT NO;,, 91-03 FOR A :103,S52 SQUARE FOOT INDOOR WHOWSAlF/RETAIL COL-MRCIAL USE tOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSVRZAL DISTRICT, 'SUBAREA'11, INDUSTRIAL S&ECIFIC PLAN AT 11S30 SIXTH-:STREET., AND MAKING FINDINGS 'IN SUPPCIRT THEREOF - APN: 229-026-28. A. Recitals, l} ( ) James Page has filed-,an application for` the issuanca,'&f the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-03 as described in tht title of t+9.c', R�tsolut on. Hereinafter In-this ;Resolution, the subject Conditional Una Permit request is referred to :as "the application." (1i) on the .Sth of May 1991, the :Planning Commission of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga c onducted a duly noticed pubi e-bearing on the application and concludmd said1P.earing on that date. (ii: ) on the 8th of May 1991,,the Planning i:ommisaion Of ths`City of" Rancho Cucamonga reviev! l associated file Moedifi:W ion' to Conditional Use, Permit EC% to amend the original file alloWin ` , gr�incre intensive uses titan, those originally approved. !� Adak (iv) All- g�`_ Qrerequiaitsa prior to tie Adoption Of thia.Resolution ~� have occurred. ;.•,, - , B. Reolution. NOW, THEREFORE# it .is hereby found, determined,'`and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of. Rancho Cucamonga as fC."lowas I. This Commission. herftby`apecitically-'finds tm�� all of the facts, net forth in the Recitkiae Part A, of this Resolution sre trua and correct, a. Basod upon nubstantial evidefics presentad -lao �thii Commission during the above-referenct.,i.",;.,public hearing on May 8, 1991,, inoluding writtc, and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) Tha application applies to property located at 11530'sixth Street with. a. atraet r,�).`x*ntage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 lest and is presently' improv6d with 3 research and develcpaen': buildings and 760 parking spacenj and' (b) The property to the north, mouth, east' and "at is General Industrial. f P- 7- l� PLANNING &)MKSSTON,RESOLUTION NO. 4 CUP 91-03 = SAM�`.lpAGE June 26, 1991 ' Page 2 (C) The application contemplates the operation of an indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial use 'within an existing- 103,552 square foot industrial building. (d) The application contemplates public hours ai operation from GOO p.m, to S 00aI.m. on Friddj`,, 10:00 a.m. to :8:00 p.m. on 5aturdaye, and 10:00 a.m, to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays: (s) the applicant, proposes" o maintain office 'hours from Monday through Friday and permit incidental-stock.ng of merchandise for vendors onlye, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to thts Commission during the, above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphe 1 and 2'above, this commission hereby finds and concludes as follows- c'�J (a) That the praposod use .is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development:,code,- and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. . (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applic:.ble thereto, will not be detrimental to tha.public health, safety, or welzare or materially injurious to properties or-improvemente in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development code., 4. Thie' Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project :has been reviewed and considered incompliance with the'California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, ,further, this Commission hereby,issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. 5. "Based, upon the findings and- conclusions set forth in paragraphs c. 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission`hGreby approves the application subject to each and every condition met forth below: 1) A_minimum of four maintenance personnel will be on-sits, during public hours of operation. 2) Trash shall be picked up daily to ensure proper maintenance of the entire site. 3) Sufficient trash receptacles, compatible with existing, pedestrian furniture, shall be added directly adjacent' to, and interior to, all public entries.- 4) All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. i �g� f f T PLANNING-COMMISSX6if RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-03 J.mic-S PAGn June 26, 1991 Page 3 5) A minimum,of four secur ty-persoanol will be on- site during public hoars of operation. In addition, 24-hour sp eskty will be provided for the faeility while the facility is closed. 6) , A management- team of sixrto ten persons will be +on-site during oPeraticInal houra< 7) The swap meet organizer shall 1r2ov3.de the Business License.Department with to updated list on 'a monthly basis of all -vendors. If the organizer,_dc+es not supply the list, they will he responsible tifor, business license payments, for venders. The list shall include-the mailing , addresses for all vendors. 8) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the, Building and Safety Department will require piano to be prepared for the 'p2sn check review process. The plans must provide compilance with the Uniform Building, Plumbing, and ' the Mecharizcal Codes and the National Electrical code as adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 9) A,`,1 _signage, in conju:iction with the away meet uses, will be subject to the City,s Sign ordinance anel any Uniform Sign Program in puce, on the project site,-' 10) Any special event, such as, a promotional sale, shall be conducted by the management -entity and shall be subject to the Temporary. Use :Permit process. 11) All activities steal-_ be conducted inside the building. No display,;_ sales,'. or food vendors' shall be permitted outside the building, except as', may .be approved through a Temporary Use j ;hermit. `. . �1 12) The aptlie$;et shall submit a wastewater survey to the Cucamonga County Water District during the plan check process, prior to issuance of building permits, to determine pro-treatment requirements and any additional sewer development fees that may be required. l4 0 P4AMING COMMISr46N RESOLUTION NO. \ CUP 91-03 - JAHES PAGE June 26, 1991 Page 4 13) Occupancy. of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshall's' regulations'have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plane shail,�\ be submitted' to the Rancho °Cucamonga Fire " Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 14) The applicant shall 'provide a separate water meter for the retail facility, as determined by the Cucamonga County Water District. Plans shall be <submitted to ,the District for review, -`:and %pproval, Prior to issuance of building permits. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED T£�IS4'26TH DAY405' JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 BY: Larry T. MCNiel, Chairman ATTEST: _ Brad Buller, Secretary' 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the, Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and 4 regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the . City of Rancho Cucamonga,. at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of Juno 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONFM,.: NOES: 00143ISSIOMM: ABSENT: COMHISSIGNEM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 26, 1991 TO. Chairman and Memhers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller-, City,Planner BY: Jerry Guarracinof. Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND EVELOPI�iENT REVIEW 89-15 DIVEP.SIrIMD - Thl' development of Phase IIZ1' of a neighborhood commercial shopping center consisting of two retail.' buildingv totaling 14,800 square feet on �l 12.96 acres of land within an approved shoppifig center in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the%f northeast co{?Crr of 8a<Ien and Highland Avenues;= "' APN: 201-2`11-66 and 71. j s, T. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. :Action Requested: Approval of .Detailed Sire°t Plan and Elevations and issuance of a Negative Declarntim. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonins: blorth Single family homes; Low Residential' District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South Vacant (Route 30 right-of-way); Low" Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Apartmentst'' Medium-High Residential.- District (14-24 dwrliing units per acre) West - Vacant, Gindominiums, Gas Stationi Office Professionals Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre)', Neighborhood,Commercial C. General Plan Designations:> Project Site Neighborhood Commercial North - Low Density Residential (2-4; dwelling units per acre) South Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East Medium-High De.tsity Residential 04-24 dwelling units per acre) West - Office Professional, Low-Medina=Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Neighborhood Commercial ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 89-15 - DIV9SIFTED` June 26, 1991 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The site is rough graded with turf as erosion control. South of the project site is the;,,future interchange; of the proposedcFoothill Freeway. L. Parking Calculations: Slumber of dumber of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Retail No. 3 11,2011 1/250 45 , 45 Commercial Pad 3,600, 1/250' 14 _14 Existing Center minus proposed McDonald's 91,190 1/250 3E a 364 Anion 76 2,700 3+2 per}bay 11 11 Restaurant Uses e.,000 1/100" 80 80 Total 514 514 r II. BACKGROUND. This proj((v, t was originally filed as Development Review 88-10 and included commercial bui?ding no. 20' retail no. 3' and the site, upon which' McDonald's was ''eventually approved. In October of 1990,'the applicant withdrew Development Review 88-10 in favor of two separate applications: -(1) Conditional Use Permit 88-18 for the MCDonaia's restaurant,' and (2) Development Review 89-15 for commercial buildinctJ_Y1. 2 and retail no. 3, (this application). In November of '1990, the applicant requested a continuance from the Design Reviev' COmmitCc meeting scheduled for November 27, 1990, to reassess the project in light of the current economic climate. The project remained inactive until March 7, 1991, at which"time the proect was reviewed by the Design Review Committee. III. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project is Phase III of the ,Haven Village Shopping Center. On September 24, . 1986, the Planning. Commission conditionally approved this, Phase III Conceptual s Site Plan. The developer is now requesting development review of the Detailed Site Plan and elevations fortwo ,`retail buildings as 'shown in the attached Exhibits. This proposal iFr­� generally consistent with the.approved Conceptual Site Plana °r { PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPgRT DR 89-15 - DIVESIFIED June 26, 1991 t.' J Page 3 AOL The proposed McDonald (Conditional Use Permit 88-18) was approved by the Planning Commission on November 29, 1989, The current proposal will provide a continuation of the pedestrian connections from the satellite buildings to the main project.,, Also, additional plaza space with shade cover has been provided on the south side of ret-sl no. 3. B. Design Review Committee: -'The Committee (McNiel, Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed the project on April 21, 1988, and recommended approval with conditions. At the request of the applicant who desired to change the color scheme, 'the Design 'Review Committee reviewed the, modified plans, which reflected -i the previous conditions. The Committee (Chitiea, Vallette, Kroutil) again recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1 Regarding the repainting of the existing center, 'the Committee, recommended using for the wood siding and slightly darner ��-rsion of Draper Taupe (custom mix) for the trim color. , A test,panel is to be prepared for staff review 7,d final'' approval in the J field. i 2. The sloped roof-element should be continued across the entire south elevation of retail no. 3 and wrap around the east elevation 26 feet. 3. Spandrel glass should be used to form a corner window. treatment at the southeast corner of retail no. 3. 4. An open lattice trellis should be provided over the seating area south of retail no. a. 5. A dense landscape screen should be used to prevent graffiti on the rear aide of retail no. 3. G. River rock veneer should be used in place of T-111 siding 4 in the area adjacent to planters where irrigation over spray will cause excessive wear, i.e., under the window on the south side of retail no. 3, also, under 'the windows on the south side of retail no 2. 7. River rock veneer should be extended past the pedestrian door on the east elevation of retail no. 2 to,.better frame the doorway. S. A half-wall of river rock should be provided on the west elevation.of retail no. 2 between the south corner of the building and the pedestrian door to tie in with the sjver rock, under the wit t w3 on the" south elevation of' the building. , �-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPOT `I,,\DR 89-15 DIV; SIFIED June 26, 1991; Page'4 f:. The doors to the electrical closet should match those approved.for McDonald's. (Conditional Use Permit 88-18.) The applicant has revised the elevation and Site Plan and has satisfied the conditions of approval,::dcommended by the Design , Review Committees. C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed Part II of the Enviro=enta:. Checklist and found that no significant adverse, environmental impacts -'rill occur as a result of this prt-,;ect. As a result, the issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. (Please note that a Negative Declaration wag also issued for the previously approved Conditional Use Permit �1 for this shopping, center on April 24, 1985.} j IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS, The project is consistent with the Genera.?( Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purpose r,f the district in which the site is located+. The proposed use :!,nd Site Plan, together with the conditions applicable thereto y 111 not be Lletrimental to the public health, safety, or welfar%,l or materially injurious},i to properties or improvements inv the vicinity. The &spored use and Site Plan, together wit)l ''the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and�'1City ` standards. '-• V. CORRESPONDENCE: Thic, item,has been advertised as a Public hearii-,q in the: Inland-Valley_ Daily Bulletin newspaper,- the property has'= .been posted# and notices were seat to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMHENDATIO14 Staff recommends the Planning'Commission approve Development Review 89-15 and issue a Negative Declaration. (' Ii'• Respec y s.3u7bmitted Brad u er Cj.tV P anner 1} B'B:JG:mlg P.ttachments. Exhibit "XI— Apgraved Master'", r� P=hibit,"B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Exhibit "D" Landscape Plan Resolution of ApprogaL,with Standard Conditions 4 i Ir a.F Al • 19 li �r iKO�'.., Rt3 Ct D' - i D nY1nV'`OYV•IM 9�Yy _ RG ZI A4 t 1 '14 19 a z a M u _ 1 p !' Y pp 9f1N9/w NO.Zx 34 ,1'�• t I r E is st r} s S i t �Z.. �:, } `'fit 4i �': j f:►�� `�- k��F ri �fMiro s: ; ItE. tt� C Yrt - i YT }y�6• Ir t�` `SFi Q iR. _ �r_. a i `•�, i h l I rl an Im I _ t{ 3� n 4 At j I ' ( } .11 l 1 I �t ....s-. L .�5 SA L .ham •�, Li � _ � �Ilr{ l -- M2i'RR AY OF 13Ar T�) UCAIviONGA Tr Mt c 4 PI ANNIN DIVISION r G,7 EXHIBM. C'1 SCALE: i .r ary `o ppo-o- I 0 Y � Y CITY I3A T1:'F �w tZC,AMONGA EXHYBTf: -�SCALE: -g ,I - � w h aP fill UC OF f C' '` ' H_'ZONGA ITEM: PLANNQ d k I�tmr1 T.rn.E:/, a Farr; Dq SCA'-E: I� S t�s a 5 1 . t { O I jifill fill 1N �u ',, CITY 3F I3��CF�T ,x��TC�'i/!©�1CgA PLANLII�F�r,I�. 7I�ION TIT[ c ExxrBrr:j),-Z CALF.: •ti RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION of THE CITY OF RMCHo CUCAMQNGA, CALIFORNIA,, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT .9 REVIEW NO. 89- FOR TWO RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING.14,8QD SQUARE FEET WITHIN THE HAVEN VILLAGE SHOPPING; CENTER, LOCATED AT THE NORTH,AST CORNER OF HAVEN AND HIGHLAND AVENUES IN THR NEIG ORHOOD{ COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND PMING FINDINGS IN S'TPPORT THEREOF -.APN: 201-271-65 AND 71 fit. Recitals,. (i) Diversified Properties hate filed art application for the approval u- of Development Revievt No. 89-IS ae , debceited , :he ;title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,. the jev;bj3gt Development Review -i request is referred to as "the application.`, On the of 26th of June 1993, rip Planning Commission of the, city of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a m27-ting5'on t&e application and concluded said ✓ meeting on that date. (iii) All legAl prerequisites prior to the adoption of this: Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. I HOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found,: detorminedr and reso;�ved by the � Planning Commission of_the City of Rancho Cucamonga-as Eollowes ti 1. Thie Commission hereby speai€ically finds that all Of thra 'facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and, correct, 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on June ?6, 1991, including writte-n and Oral staff reports, thid<.Commission hereby specifi;ally finds as follows:' (a)' Tho application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Haven and Highland Avenues with a street ='rootage of 830 feet and lot depth of 445 'feet and is presently improved with a 91,191 square foot shopping center; and (b) The property to the north' of the subject site is single family homes, the property to the south of that site is vacant, the property to the east is apartments, and the property to the'west is partially vacant with existing condominiums, and _ (c)> The proposed Detailed Site Plan and Elevations comply ,:4.th the luster plan and architectural theme established for thin center. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION.NO. c DR 89-15 DIVERSIFIED PROPERTLE$,, rr June 26, 199`,. j Page 2 AML 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented-to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the, specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of.the General Plan; and b( ) T1:at,the Proposed use is in accord with the objectives of 7 " II the Dsvelogmsnt Code and the purposes of the district in which the. site .is located; and (c) Thai 'the proposed ,use ie' in compliance crith each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code;.and ' (d) :hat 'the;'%p�roposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will ni . he' detrimental to the;pubtiic health, safety, or welfare or materially t injurious`to propert$�as' or improvements in he vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and,certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in c'empliance with the' California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further., this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in .paragraphs 1,.2, 3, and 4 above, this commission hereby approves the application subject to , ach,and every condition set forth below ana in then attached Standard- . Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein. by"thisilreference. Plannino Division: 1} All future sign shall 'conform to the uniform: sign program as established 'in the Haven Village Shopping' hopping Center. The uniform sign program for the existing 'center shall 'be amended to .includri ^an 11r`improvements, and shall be consistent with the sstablishe�',� sign- program for the center. 2) The site shall be developed and maintained inn. accordance cJith the approved Site Plane (which' includes architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping,' and grading)! on file with. the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, fund Development, Code regulations. lM 1 3) Graffiti shall be removed.-,within seventy-two hours. '1 ' PLANNING COMHXSjION RESOLUTION NO.: DR 89-25 -- DIJERSIFTED PROPERTIES Juno 26, 1991 o Patc 3 � �+ 4) The entire site shall be kept free of -ash and debris .at all times, and ;in no, even¢ shall •trash and debris,; remain for '{ttorI- than , : ;. twenty-four hours. 5) There shall be provisions for the following design features in the trash enclosure to the satisfaction of thie,City Planner-:,.., 1 a) Architecturally integrated into_.the design �.. ` of thc�shopping center. h) Separate pedestrian k-;cess that does not I opening'the main doors to include �6elf-�.Ioaing stnian*door. c)- Large enough to accommodate two trash ,.,bins. d) Roll-uP:�doors. e) Trash bins with'counterweighted'lids. Ask f) Architecturally treated ,overhead shade _ trallls. V ` 7t gj Chain links-ccresn on top to prevent trash, .from blowing�out,of enclosure and designed to be hidder`frcm view, _ 6) Trash collecticn shall occur, 'between) the hours i of 9:00 a.m. and i$:00 p.m. only. 1 'All operationh iJ(and businesses 'shall be conducted. to I-c©ply with the following L. standards, which,Pdhall be incorporated into the lease agreem"t.;bf Ali tenants: . f a) Notes lev{In. -All commercial aetiviti.*s` fi shall not create any noise that would I j exceed and exterior 'xoise navel of 60 dBA during t' a hours of `10:00, p.m.. to 7:00 a.m4 and 65:dBA during the hours of " (� 7:00 a.m to 10.00' p.m. b) Loading the Unload'-g. No person Shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, :or othftr han dling :of ` bases, ceates,1 containers, buildincj materials, �� ,f garbage cans, or similar objects between PLANNING COMMISSION,RESOLUTION NO. DR 89-15'- DIVERSIFIED PROPERTIES June 26, 1991 Page 4 the hours, of 10:00 p.m. and'7:00 -a.m., unless otherwise "specified herein, in a manner which would cause a ' noise disturbance to a residential4area. fi c)i Any outdoor , vending machines shall be recessed into building faces ai:3 shall not extend out into the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be ,reviewed and appioved Any the City Planned. �t' Eineerin n D s i 0 o ivio 1) Construct the Haven Avenue �t is er7uth of the southerly driveway no fur�nwr than Highland Avenue.,, The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement o£ one-half' the Cost` of construction from 'future development on the , west side of Haven Avenue. In the event that construction of this portion of the median �} becomes a City project, the developer shall participate in funding one-half' the project cost. ; ' 2) Complete street improvements on the east aid of Haven Avenue from th project's boundary to Highland Avenue, I:rf&ue curbs, rbs, gutter, street lights, AC pavement,. ` and curb-r4,jacerit sidewalk. 3) Reconstruct the southerly drive approach on Haven Avenue to the satisfaction. of the City Engineer. !�4) The existing 1Z o aeibad utilities (telecommunieaticdis and electrical) on the project_: site%of Hlaven Avenue shalj be u d n ergroundea'from the existing terminus south of the southerly driveway ',�,o the first pole south of the Caltrane right-of-way for the Route '30 Freeway prior to public improvement.j acceptance or occupancy, -whichever occurs first. , The developer may request a reimbursement afreement to recover one-half the City's adopted cost for undergrounding- from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on'the opposite side of the street and south of ^N Route 30. Services crossing Haven Avenue shall be placed underground at the same time as the main line. d '1. - 4inr"=;.:�� •lam PLANNING COMMISSION''RESOLUTION�NO. DR 89-15 - DIVERSIFIED PROPERTIES June 26, 1991 Page 5 5) An in-lieu fee as,`contribution to the future: undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of Highland Avenue shall be paid to the City prior eto the issuance of building permits. : The fee shall be one,-half the City'® adopted unit amount times the length from "the banter ofHaven Avenue to the east' project boundary. 3i 4"r,, The Secretary to this Commiasion shall certify to the adoption n, of this Resolution. t t APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF.JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF TIW CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA v ` BY. . Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary��- I, Arad P ller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of te44 City of Rancho Cucamonga,'-',do hereby certify that the foregoing.`Resolution wse duly and regularly introduced, parsed, and adopted by the Planning: Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regulartmeeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: r ABSENT: . COMMISSIONERS: k_ G- �I DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPWRENT bTAN DARD uONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBJECT. APPLICANT: Diye,!5i - LOCATION: ti k'Y1 �'tu, QMV-1 Ldr Those items cheated are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714)889-11SO11, irrOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time-Limits 1. Approval shall expire,unless extended by the Planning Commission,li building pemmts are -JJ— not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from ftwd ieofapproval. 2. Development/Design Review shag be approved prior to,_ 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. Is granted subject to the approval of r_ 4.Tnedevelopershafycowmmnae,particlpaie in,and orsurnmatteorcauusetobscommeneed, participated in,or consumineted,a Mello-Roos Community Facilities DMrkt(CFD)for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protecdon District to finance oonsinction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the developff". The station WWI be located,designed,and built to all specification of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and shall become the District's party upon-onpWton. The of stt4F..be selected by the District in accordance with Ile needs"In any building of a station,the developer sW comply wit`,zll appbicab►s taws and ragul& .The CFDshag be tamed tha DiA.AA and the developer by the Kno recordation e7 tho final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the Issuance of building permits,whichever comes first,the aWtant shall consort to, or participate in,the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the oa ruction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. however,if any school district has previo^u*established such a Comrranity Facilities District,the appiicarg shag, In the alternative,oonsent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the reomdation of the final map or the issuance of building permits.whicitaver comes first.Furttrer,Y the affected school distriu has notforrnedaMello-Roos Community FacRiesDistrictwftwmtwelve months from 1119 date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project,this condition shag be deemed null and void. SC-2/91 1 or 12 protect HIK Completion Deter This condition shall be waived H the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Priorto recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved,written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be 3vailanle to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water districtwhhin90 days priortofinal map approval in the case of subdivision orpriorto issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B.Site Development 1.The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with he approved plans which __J_/_ include site plans,architectural elevations,exterior materials and odors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Division,the iurt. ftions contained herein, Development Code regulations.ertd — _ Sliimed-GeM► nni4p 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity bear y commenced thereon, all Conditions of approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of tha City Planner. 3. Occ;aancyof the facility shall not commence until suchtimeasall Uniform BuildingCodeand _J_ State Fire(Marshall's regulattons have been compiled with. Priorte occupancy,plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be Inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. f 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditiorn of Approval shall be J I_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to Issuance of building permit. ,. 5. All site,grading,landscape.irrigation,and streetimpmvem®nt plans sh all be coordinated for ---/�_ consistency prior to Issuance of any patrons(such as gradfrtg,tree rerneval,encroactiment, building,etc.),or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all other applicable City Ordinances,and appOcabl*Comrnunity Platte or!4wc fie Plans in effect at the time of Building Perrot issuance. -- 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan salsa be reviewed and appmved by the City Manner and _J--J Sheriffs Department(989-681 t)pdorto the Issuance of building penfft. Such plan shall indicate style,illurNnaation;ices(ion,height, and method of shisidfng so as not to adversely affect adjacent pmWies. 8. If no centralized trash mceptac ies are provided,all trash pick-up shall be for Individual units Jam_ with all receptacles shielded from public view. z9. Trash receptacie(s)are raqueed and SW ttsaet Clay SW%jarda. The final design,locatlons, _I—J and the number of trash receigacles shall be subject to City Plattner review and approval prior to issaance of building permits. 10.All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers,AC condensers,etc.,shall _l_J be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or rnasonry walls,'berming, andfor landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. B!®t 2of 12 l7 ,ob ea-rs' Sstnolecon Dam• 11.Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12.All twilling numbers and individual units shall be Identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper ilium°nation. 13.A detailed plan indicating trail widths,maximum slopes,physical conditions,fencing,arid J weed control,in accordance with City Master Trail drawings,shall be submitted for City Plannerreview and approvalpdorto approval and reconiationof theFlnalTra,'Maparilprior to approval of street improvement and grading plans.Devebpershail upgrzile Ond construct all trails,Including fencing and drainage devices,In conjunction with streetdmprovements. 14.The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions(CC&Rs)shall notprohloitthe keeplN:*jf equine _.J-J animalswhere zoning requirements forthe Keping of saidanimals have been met.individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners'associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15.The Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions(CC&Rs) and Articles of incorporation of the Homeowners'.Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attomey.They shall be recorded cornxurernty with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A r,,corded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16.Allparkways,open areas,and landscaping shall be permanently maintained bytheproperty owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape ma:penance shalt be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17.Solar access casements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system.The easements may be contained In a Declaration of Restrictionsfor the subdivision which shall be recorded concurre Roy Wth the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits,whichever comes first.The easements shall prohibit the casfing of shadows by vegetation,structures,fixtures ct VW other object,except for utility wires and similar objects,pursuant to Devslopnignt Code Section 17.08.060.G-2, 18.The project contains a designated Historical Landmark.The site shall be developed and _u'_J mainta ned in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Pam*No. Any further modifications to the site Including,but not limited to,exterior alterations an dlor intedoralleraWmwhichaffeClithqexteriorofthebuddingsorstructures,ramovaloflandmark trees demolition,relocation,recaristruction of buildings or structures.arcbariges to the site, shall require a modification lo the Histo3ric Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Presematton Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all duelling units ___/—/_ and for healing any swimming poor or spa,unless other aNemative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equlvalerK capacity and efficiency.All swkr ling pools installed at the time 'initial developmerK shall be supplemented with solar M,atktg. Details shaft be incl ud',J in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Piaroer revew and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side acid rear elGvations upgraded with architectural J_ treatment,detailinig anid increased delineation of surface treatment subect to City Planner ' review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. SC-2/91 3of12 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners`Association shall be submitted for J City Planner and Building Oftial review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. —Z4. All root appurtenances,Including air conditioners and olherroof mounted equipment and/or projections,shall be shielded irom view and the sound buffered from adjac3ntpropenie--,nd streets as required by the Planning Division.Such screening shall be architecturally ir.- rated with the building design and constructel j:to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans., D. Parking and Vehicular Access(indicate details an building plans) i. All parking lot landscape Islands shai.nave a minimum outside dimension of6 toot and shall e� eonlain a 12-Inch walk adjacent to the parking stall(IrrUinq curb). Y 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavament across circulation aisles shall be --�-1 providedthmughl,utthe developmnt ftsrr4'3'3si�"' 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, J` entrances,and exits shall be striped per City standa ds. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways.are less than IS toot in �--J— depth from back of sidewalk 5. The Covenants,ConditionsandRostrkxbns shall restrict thestorageafrecreationa!vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than to designated visfior parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer,and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Disiftroviewandapprbvafpriortoissuancoof building permits. E. Landscaping(for publicly maintained la cross.raferto Suction N.) +. A detailed lanckscape and krigatbnplan,inckttangslopepiartting and Model home l Ing in the case of residential development, shall be pmW,,,d by a licensed iandscape are hitectandsubmittedtorCRYPiannet,ravlwrandapproWs pil*rtotheissuancaofbuilding permits or prior final ritap approval in the case of a tjton lot subdiv!lcn. 2. Ex�stlng trees required to be pMfvsd in place OW be pMtsdedwn aConstnXtion barrier _j_ j In ace r+dancewiththe WrJ*WCode S:Iction 19.05.110.and So notedonthegradingplans The boa!irutaltt sistraestobapreamw1inptam,andneurioratkirtBfasirat>spiarttedirees shall beshoro nonthadetailed oens.Theapplicentshaatollow&Hoffhearbodsrs recommondations regarding preservation, and triM"ft Mettxxds. 3. Aminimumof trees pargmsswe.Comp,40ofMototr Mrgskes,shabbeprovkW —J--/ withintheproject: %-48.InchboxorlwW.__%-36-lnchboxorlargor, %-24-inch box or larger. %-15-9alon,and %-S ggabn. 4. A minimum of 9 v %of trees plartted w iN.n fhe project!shall be specimen size trees- __.J`l— 24-inch box or larger. v 5. Within parkln4 i !s,trees shall be planted at a rate of ow 151WIon tree for every three ,_— _— parking stalls,sufficient to shade 50%of the parking area at ealar noon on August 21. SC-2/gt 4or13 G, l Z. 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at arate of one tme per 30 linear feet of building. V 7. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 orgreater slope,but less than 2:1 sope,shall be,at minirssum,irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent Irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. All private slopes in excess of5fee.,but lessthan8feet inverifcai height and of2:1orgroater slope shall shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion contro',and to soften their appearance as fellows:one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.ft..of sops area,1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq,ft.of slope area,and appropriate ground cover..in addition,slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical heWd and of 2:1 orgreater slope shall also include one. gallon or larger size tree per each 260 Sq.ft.of slope area.Trees and shrubs shall be planted in zMaggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane.Slope planting required by this section shall inc!vtds a permanent irrigation system to bs installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family reakfen iai development,all slope planting and InigIaton shall be continu- J—J ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each Individual unk is sold and occupied by the buyer.Priortomleasingoccupancyforttmseuntts,aninsfac ion shall be conducted by the Planning Division to detennine that they are in sa:isi;?r dory condition. 10.For mufti-family residential and non-residential development,property owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all larascaped areas on-silo,as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shalt be ',ept 1''ea from woods and debris and maintahned in a healthy and thriving comiWn, and shadi receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and Mmming• Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date-of damege. 11.Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Devefolfinent Coda and/or_ street trees and slope plat_--a. This requirement shah be In addition to the required 12.The final design of the perinxter parkways,walls,landscaping,and sidewaiks shall be inckrded in the required landscape plans end&hall be Wbjec t.0 Ctty Plarurer review and approval and coordinated forconsistencyw hanypark►ray iztrrdscapktgplanwhkctmaybe required by time Engineering Davison. 13-Special landscape features such as mounding,At"rock.specimen size tines,meander- fno sidowak intes(with horizontal change),and neffied landscapng,ac required along ✓ 14.Land MW t3t SAD Irrigatlon'y sine regtrkad to be irtstalledwshin the pubtic efgttt-of-gray on _!_/_ the perimeter of tM project area shaft be con oualy mall t red by the developer. 1 S.All walls shag be PMvkW with decorative treatment.if Wded In public maintenance areas, the design Shah be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16.Tree maintenance c0eria stag-use developed and etabnn sd for Cky Planner review and _i_l,.— approval prior to issuarnce of building Pemaga. These Criteria ft,4 encourage the natural growth charMeristlos of the selected tree species. 17.Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the prirmcaples of —1_I_ Xi SCape as defined in Ch apter 18.16 of the Rancho Gmnnonga Mun3c4a1 Coda. SC-2/9t 8cf12 (3 — C) iZB'-t-t-ice F.Signs � COM21 - 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptial only and riot apart of thisappinvai. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shalt require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shallbe submitted for City Planner review,and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sdgn(s)shall be provided for apartment,condominium,or lownhomas prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by tte Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.Environmental 1. The developershail provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Sock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyor writtten notice of the;rify Adopted —�---� Special Studies Zone for the Red HUI Fault, Ina standard format as detemmnmd by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prosp.,Awe buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway J_J— project In a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on arty property. 4. A final acoustical report shad!id submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. AN final report shall dlsc uss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL,the building materials and constructlam techniques provided, and it appropriate,verify the adequacy of the mitigatkm measures.The building plans will be checked for conformance with the n tgation measures contained in the final report., H.Other Agertciea 1. Emergency secondary at;cess shall be provkled In accordancewith Rancho Cucaumnlia Fire Protection District Standards. 2. Emargency access s1WIbe provided,maintenanceIlms and clear.amWfnumofx6teetwide J at all times during construction In accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to Issuance of buileirg permits for gombuMW construction, evkFence shall be _/__Jr submittedtotheRa choCucamongaFireProtection that temporary water supply for fire protection is avallabie,psndirrg ocmpcetion or feciuked fire protection system. 4. The applicant shall cOMW the U.-S.Postal Senrim to dstem*ta the appropriate type and Jam— location of mail boxes.MuWamKy residential developments shall provide a solid overhead Structure for frail boxes with adsquata 6Pkg.Tre final location of the mail baxss and the design of the overhead structure shah he sub ect to City Ptannar review and approval prior to the Issuance of building penWs. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities,written certiflWbon of acceptability,including all i J- Supportive information,shah be obtained from the San Ssmardino County 0epartm9nt of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits,acid prior to issuance of building permits. SC-,2/91 d of 12 9Q-j;' APPLICANTS SMALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY PrVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR AffikCOMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I.Sft�lapment 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest ad-opted Uniform Building Code,Uniform MechanL —J—l— cal Code,Undorrn Plumbing Code,National Electric Code,and all other sppc.riabis codes, ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety.Divltr;i for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance ind applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for anew residential dwcWV unif(s)or major addition --J--1— to existing unit(s),the applicant shallpaydevelhprhentfeesattheestahlishedrate.Suchfees may inchde,but are not limited to:City Beautification Fee,Park Fee,Drainage Fee,Systems Development Fee,Permit and Plan Checking Fees,and School Fees. �3. Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or _--J addition to an existing development,the applicant shag par development Lees at the established rate. Such fees may Include,but are not limited to.Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee,School Fees,Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4.Street addresses shall be providedbyt"Building Official.afrertract1parcel map recordation ___/ and prior to Issuance of building permits. J.Existing Strustuses 1. Proiide compliance with the Uniform Bu'.--'mil Coda for the property line clearances AaL considering use,area,and fire-resistivilness of exlating buildings. - z ExWing buildings shall be made to cQmp(y with Cortwl building and toning rmgiulations for the intended use or the building snail be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed,fiii6d ariftrcappedto comply with the —J Jr, Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown oa bulic€ktg;4M 60mitted for _J__J._ building pami t application. 1iI K.Gradl I _1. Grading of the Property shall be In accordance with the Uniform Building Code,City —J—J— Gradadin S���wooed grading practkk a.The final grading plan shall be inSUWV" � with the approved grading piper• 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the StWa of Cain mia to J_l_ perform sucft walc. 3. The da,_.optnsnt Is boated within the sotl erosion=Mrol boundaries;a`Snil Disturbance ___(_ l Permit Is required.PlOass cOrtt-fICISan Se19121161noCCyuunly Degartmeraof/4griCulture at(714) 387-2111 forpemdiapptration.t?Mournentatiorio suchpemtksWb;isubmitted to the city prior to the Issuance of rough grace►-g permit. I; 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualdled engineer or geologist and submitted at J.�,l— { the time of application for rrading plan check. 7� S. Thefinal grading plans shall becompleted and aMwiedpriortoissuarMof building parmits. —/_i_ SC•2/91 7cf12 QMpJe4on Dne., 6. As a custom-lot subdivWor+,the following requirements shall be met: a.Surety shall be pc ted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site —J—�— drainage facilities necessary for de►vatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety%idsion pnorto final map approval and priorto the issuance o",grading permits. b Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto �—�-- or over adjacent parcels,are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Suikiing and Saf:�ty Division prior to Issuance of grading and building permits. c.On-site drainage improvements,necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided —��— ..iperlles.are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon a.,y parcel that may be subject to d'ainage flows entering, leaving,or within a parcel: relative to which a building permit is requested. d.Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety J--f--- Division for approval pinto issuance of building and grading,pan its.(This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e.All swipe banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical twiglw shall be seeded with nativo glasses 1--or planted with ground cover for e*osion rontroi"upon completion of grading or some other altemativen+.ethatoferosioncor0rol shall becomptetedto the satisfaction ofthe Building Official.In additions permanent Irrigation system shall be provided, This requirement does not release the applicant/developer 9rom compliance with the slope,planting requirem nts of Section 17.08,0401 of the Developmrit Code, APPLICANT SHALL CAt+t'ACTTHE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714)SM1582 FOR COMPLIANCE AIL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L Dedication and Vohle ular Ace a _ 1.Rights-of-way and easements shay be dedicated to the City for all interior public--treats, community traits.public:paseos,public is uisca m areas,street trees,and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans artdfor tentative reap, Private easements for non-pt biic facilities(cross-lot drainage,local feeder tram,etc.)alail be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following""I-way on the per*Mer streets (measured from str0et centerline) total feet on total feet on iota!feet on total feet on - 3. An imevocableofferofdedication for_-toot wide roadway easemerashalibemade for all all private streets or drives. 4. Nom,rehiculae access shall be dedicated to the CNy for the fallowing streets, J 5. ReaOm:access easements shali be provided ermdrg access to all parcels by CCARs! J_ or by deeds and shad be recorded concurrently with the inap of prior to the Issuance of building permits,where fa map is involved. SC-21SI Sor14 CT^Z3 o. Private drainage easements for(;ross-k, gage shall be provided and shall be delineated Spieao,o"` or noted on the final map. I _/_/ 7. The fin3i map shall clearly delineate a'ld;foot minimum building restriction area ou the neighboring lot adjcning the i:iiro lot line wall and contain the following language: 'me hereby dedicate to ti:;Zity of Rancho Cucamonga the rght to prohitvt the construction of(residential)buildings(ir ether wt actures)within those areas designated on the map as building restncttion areas.' A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lotto the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. All existing easements lying withinfuturarighis-of-way shall be quitclaimed ordei€neatedon the final map. I _9. Easei:enls for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way _-( I shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto,private property. 10.Additional street right-of wayshall be dedicated alongfighttum lanes,to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs.If curb adjacent sidewalk Is used along the right tum lane.a parallel street free maintenance easement shall be provided. 11.The developer shall make a good frritn effort to acquire the required off-sttepvWrtyInterests —J__ !_ necessary to consirnct the required public InViovemants,and ifhe/she should fall to do so, ,.r the developer shall,at least 120.days prior to submittal of the final map for approval,enter info an agreement to corrpkate the Improvements pursuant to Government Crie Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property Interests required forthein* ovcrngms. Sur-n agreement shall provide for payment by the developerof all casts hMrfed by the City to acquire the off-sfte prcperty interests requked in connec4ionwith the i ubdlviWi.Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash depose in tha'amourd given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer.at developer's cost.'^to appraiser shall have been approved by the Chy prior tv eotm eneerinra of the appraisal. M.Street knprovtt 1. Ah;dblic Improvements(I.,-Zlior streets,drainage fOCRIGs,community trails,paseos, lanKiscaped areas,etc.)shown on tine p'am anftrtetKative map shad lea constructed to Ciky Standards. Intailor street€rrrprevamants ahaa ItTluft,butane not Bmdted to.curb and i gutter,AC pavement,.drive app"Chas.sidewalks,street Dire,arks street trees. 2. A minimum of 26-ftvt wbo pmm rlt,wsign a 40 loot wade dedicated rigid-Of-*,ay shO be r Co ucled for ant halt-section gh"ts. J 3. Construct 9W fOlOwkV pGrU reter street hnprovometts Including,but not amited to: STREET NAM CURD 8 Zc7 SOS DRIVE MTMZ,T 217I ER MIT WALK APM LIGH13 TBOW .TRAIL tSI�Itli?, �tt� S07-2/91 7 ca„a�tiat o.�: Notes: (a)Median island includes larldscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c)it so marked,side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD.304. (d)it so marked,an in4lau of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvem?nt plans and construction: a. Street Improvement;plans Including street trees and scree:lights,prepared by a reglF- l— ter6d Civil Engineer,shall be sUbmitted to and approved by City Engineer.:Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing co,'yVaticn of the public and/or private street Improve- ments.prior to final map approval orals Issuance of building g permits,whichever occurs first. b. F7ior to airy work being perforated In pubUo right-of-way,toss shall be paid and a _/ ! construction penttft shall to obtained(tarn the City Engineer's Off Ice in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping,marking,traffic,street namesignbV,end IMemonnect conduit __J__J_ shall be installed to the satisfactlon of the City Engi--ar. d. Cignalconduftwith pull boxes shall be Malledon any new constnkttonerreornsstwctbn ___/A./._ of major,secondary cr eoiiecto.6treets which WersecY with other major.secondary o collector streats icr:iuture vatfic signals..PuP boxes shag be ptaced on both sides of the street at3 feet outsdcsof SCR,ECR orany otherlocations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1)All pull boxes shall be No.6 unless otherwise specsfes!by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-isr h gaivvanized steel wth pullrope. e. Wheel cl-,Vrraffps shall be Installed on all four corners of Intemeaions per City --�J-- Sl to At or as&Wed by the City Engineer. I. Existing Cfty roads requiring c onsi tie'3idrt shall r umM open to ft tic at all tunes with misquatedstoumdurinjconslimcl ilia.Aelm tiosurapsrnsittrWbe reWired.Acash deposit eh*-Jd be provided to mvver Cite cost of Waft and pairing. which shall be refunded uporcoinpiation of the cow rintionto ttte tsattsfaWon of ft City Engineer. g. Conr enVdadttrainageflowsshallnot cmea Mewaft.Undersidewalkdrains shall be _J_/_ installed to Criy StawA tt ,except for same famsy tots. h. Warmlicap auras ramp design shalt beds specifled by the City Engineer. I. Strerstrttfne "11beapMvedby the City PtmwpriortastarnAW for first plan check. _! 'f S.Street ImprcveMWA plans per city stanflafft for al private streets ad be providers for �J review and appmai bytha City Engineer. Ptlor to any wosk b ft pwftmwd on ilia psi- vate streets.Pees snail be paid and corMUOM ps3maks shall be obtained from ft City Engineer's Oflica In addition to any other RanNe raWWO. tJ 6.Street trees,.a tnlnimm of i 5gallon size or tagw,shag be±nstalled per My StaMards In 4 accomlarze with the City's street tree program S-2/01. 10of12 &—Z 5 CD 7.Irdersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. a. On collector or larger streets,lines of sight shall be plotted for all project'!ntersections, -J�— including driveways Waits;signs and-slopes-shall be boated outSidethe-lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. focal residential street Intersections shall have their noticeabliity improved,usually by movingthe 2+/-closest street treason each side awayfromthe street and placed in astreet /! tree easemsn!. Y 8.A pe ' shall be obtaine/cf�from CALTRANS for any work v .Ah the following right-of-way: 9.All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the Issuance of building permits: N.Public Wintenance Areas 1.A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Work.Standards j--1,-- sIW basubnufi Wt4 the C.W En0irtaer' view an paw,to fifild approval or issuam: el building fefinits vtiis rls ratr"t�s� pwuways, merUns,paseos,ease Craft,ur ottrareae era c�e,� d to be an n ed Into the Landscape Mamtettanc C AJ.enkse;' act;ct.r = 2.A si consent and wai+narform�tondlcrform t�appmprlateLand�smpqd Lighting CisftteshaUbe f ledu1th theCity Engineer pdortotinatn apawmvalor tssuancaetbuilding permits whichever occurs fie t.Formation costs shall be home by developer. 3.All recluired public landscaping and Irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. !/ 4.Parkway lands�q;irg on t 'rg street(s)shall c rm to the suits o4 the respective Beautification Master 0.Drainage and Flood CofKml t• The proms(or portions tFwaof)is located within a Flood Hazard Zone;therefore,flood —J—� prCtectian measures sitar be provided as certified iota registered Chit Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. , 2.it shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The develoWe engineershdll prepare all necessary reports,purls,mid hydroto&ftlydraullc calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOMA)shah be obtained from FERIA prior to final map approval or issuance of building psnms,whichever oocum Mat.A Letter of Map Revision(LOMR)shalt be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance,whichever occurs first. 3.A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final r map approval or the issuance of building perrni%whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as requirEdby the City E gineer. SC- e 2/ 1 11 or 12 7.Intersection line of site designs.shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with ' adopter.,riolicy.dM a. On collector or larger streets,lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, —1 imluding driveways.Walls,signs,and slopes shall he located outside the lines of sight. UIndscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight stall be approved by the City Engineer. b.Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeabillly improved,usual y �J J moving the 2+/-cteseststreettreeson each side awayfromthestreetandplacedI street tree easement. 1X8.A pe if shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the lollori right-of-way: 9.All public Improvements on the following streets shall be operatlo complete prior to the —J—�-- issuance of building permits: N.Pubc Maintenance Arena . 1.A separate set of landscape and Irrigation plans per nesting Public Won:.. standards shall be be submitted to the City Engineer for review royal prior to Ginal map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever arxurs t '.Ttte toiiortring I ndscape parkways, medians,pasoos,easements, trails,crbther are °.are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: ASK .A signs(Icm sent and waiver form tojo4ZOO=theappropriateLandscapeandLighting, Districts snaabef{laciwit/Son erpaiot�final enaf3approval oristuarrcaofbUikting permits whichever occur gists shall be borne by the developer, L/ 3.Allrequiredpubl3clandstionaystemsshalibacorttirwoustyRraintainedbyihe —L_/developer until accepte4.Parkway tar+.afscaping oreets)$uit conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Pt 8.Drainage and Flo"Cord 1. The project{c ftfons thereof)Is located within a Flood hazard Zone;therefore,flood J—�-- proteciloa auras shalt be provided as recoiled by a registered Civil Englnesr'and approved the City Enginpor. - 2.It shall the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone des' lion removed from the project area. The developer's anginees"shall prepare sii reports,plans,and hydro109WITYdraulic calculations. A CandRional,letter o ap Revision(CLOMR)shelf be obtained from FEMA prior to octal rho approval or trance of buildintg permits,whichever Cactus first.A Lotter of Map revision(LOMR)shall be issued byFEMA'prior to occupancy or improvernars acceptance,whi;,he 3romrs first. 3.A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer' prior to final ' J._ map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. SC-2)Bt ttof12 G -Z6 4.A permit from the County F�pd Control District is required for work within its right-6 way., J__J^ S.Trees are prohibited within 5 fee;of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. � 6.Public storm drain easements fihaii be graded to convey,))verliows to the event of a t1odcage in a sump catch basin on the public street. F.Utilities \, i '__Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas.electric power,telephone,and cable TV(all underground)`n aaardance with the.Utilriy Standards.Easements shall.be provided as,required. 2.32.The developer shalt to responsible fo,,the Mocation of existing utilities as necessary. .Water and sewer piano shay be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the -J--f— Cucamonga County Water District(CCW1D),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardir:4.A letter of r,omp!lancefrom the CCWE)is required priorlo final crap approval or Issuance of permits, whichever occurs first:, O.General Reciulremonts and AWravahi 1-The separate parcels containedwithin the;project boundaries shall be legallycorlbined Into -��--- one parcel prior to Issuance of building permits. Z An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or J� Issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first,for. i 3.Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost apportiorAng the assessments under Asaesemen 01atria among the newly created 4arC81s: �4.EtiwardalSan Sevaine Area Regional Maim,Secondary Regional,and Master;Pian Drainage Fees shall be paid pridrto final map approval or peorto building permk iswanr a If no map is Involved. i 5.Permits shalt be aMained from the folloi ft sgencies for work within ttsairsight-of-gray: JJ� 6.A stned Consent and waiver fon'n to joist andfor form the Law Enfomment Ozer tmunity J J Facilities OkM shads be filed with the City,Engicteerpriorfo Inal rrnap approval aa;�the Wwanc®of building paMb.wtUctts'ver occurs first.Formation costs shall be born by the Dever. 7.Prior to finalization of any devek,pment perm,suflio:ent irnprpverneM plant shall be coin J_J____ pleted beyond the phase boundaries to assure woondary access and drainage protection to+ the satisfaction of the City.Engineor.Phase boundaries shall corre nd to lot lines shown , on the approved teniative map, a I C sc-2/91 12 of 12 CITI'OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA STAFF REPORT An, DATE: June 26, 199f,r," TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning,Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner I BY Jerry Guarracino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT'AND CONDITIONAL USE 'PERMIT'91-17 WILLOWS COMMUNITY CHURCH, PASTOR FORREST HINDLEY The request to.establish a church and school ii' a;.leased space of 8,429 square -feet a,,thin an existing'%�ffice park on 12.59 acres of q land .in the office Professional zone, located at 10601 Church Street` - APNz '1077-421-31. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. ,I I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: AUk A. Action Requested: Approval of a non-construction Conditional Use Permit to :establish a Church/School-facility within an AW existing multi-tenant,Buiiness Park at 10601 Church Street. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin': North Evergreen Apartments: Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South Terra Vista Town Centers Community Commercial East Vacant. High Residential '(2,3-30 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant; Office'Park C. General"Plan Designations: Project Site -Office' North - 'High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) South` Community Commercial East - Office West Office „\ ij. Site Characteristic The site is developed with a malti- tenant Business,Park. �,_he site provides transition of density between" the Community Commercial zone to the south and the` Multi-Family district to the north. ` Existing tenants include, Family-Fitness Health Club, Central School District offices, State Farm Insurance, and Madole and Associates Engineers. E. Parking Calculations:` See'Exhibit "F". ITEM F { PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF ibPORT ti CUP 91-17 - WILLOWS COMMUNITY CHURCH June 26, 1991 Page 2 ti 0 II.. ANALYSIS: 1 A. General: The Willows Community Church is proposing to move �r from their present location in the Willows Pr pfessicnal Center on Archibald Avenue south of Sth street to.. the Terra Vista Business Park. The center is'a multi-tenant industrial park containing approximately 954000 square (sleet ,in four sin;,­se^story buildings. The Church intends to occupy 5,429 square feet. Proposed improvements include a 1,900 foot sanctuary with approximately 240 seats for weekend and evening worship at_3 ,a variety of G associated office and classroom space. The classrooms wi`il host a variety of activities including Mommy a Me classes. The church is also affiliated with the ARISS' Academy o€ rl_, Arts,. based in Pomona, which will. .,sponsor classes in the preforming and visual arts. A� this time, the applicant is proposing to hold services and other assembly activities on weekends and ion `weeknights. 'Proposed;:dayUme.`ac{lvities include Mommy & Me classes Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. and art classes from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. B. Issues: The primary issues associated with locating this type of; use within an Industrial setting are compatibility with surrounding businesses and parking availability. 1.' Compatibility with surrounding uses: There are a variety of uses allowed within the Office Park designations they include: profess! -al offices, some retail and service businesses, commercial recreation facilities compatible with office use, financial institutions, eating;and drinking establishmer`:s, 'and community facilities (such as churches), to .name;1 few. The majority of these businesses operate dur; regular business hours from 9:00 a.m. to 5.00 g,m. notable exception in this center would ba the family Fitness Health Club which operates during normal business hours, as well as evenings and weekends. The proposed hours of operation for,church activities will take place during off-peak-hours in the evenings C4 and on weekend days. The City has many, churches 1° operating in industrial complexes with,'-no reports of t{_ problems. Therefore, compatibility problems associated with this proposal are not expected. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-17'- WILLOWS COMUNITIt CHURCH' June 26, 1991 Page 3 AM 2. Parking. A total of 415 parking spaces are 'required, `f for Phase I and II including Ithe health club and proposed church. Currently, there 'is 'a total of 468 parking spaces: available for Phase I and:"II. A total of 32 parking spaces cre available for the proposed church facility. The church has 24h, eats whichlwould require�60 parking spaces '�"/4s60).'-However, ecause of offset peak hours, no conflicts are anticipafed as a result of the church use.. The proposed Chaffey Adult School's. Motnmy & Me classes, and the ARISE Academy classes will create a higher parking demand during deptime hours than would otherwise occur for the church use. Of particular concern are the Mommy & 'Me classes,' which involve mothers and their !afants/toddlers in planned . activities because it can be assumed that each mothei will drive to the class and stay. The Development Code parking standard for schools is one parking mace for each faculty memb,x and "ons space-1 for every. three students. .However,- staff believes that additional parking is warranted in this case and would recommend that one parking space be provided for each faculty' member and mother. Therefore, class aiza should be limited,during daytime hours to no. more than 29 mothers and :faculty members. This figure is based 'upon the church office use requiring three spaces (two pastors f' and a secretary/receptionist per Exhibit "D") and a maximum available 'parking of 32 spaces fo.r this' leasable space. It should also be noted that pri'klw to the withdrawal of Conditional Use Permit 86-201 xhe Lewis _Y.lompany was, proposing to build an addi". onad 95,000 square feet of: office space 'within Phase Ill of the Terra Vista Business Center, thereby impacting the parking facilities for all, three phases.. Because of the prevatius Family Fitness proposal, staff has been inforL.Wd that the Phase iII parking, issues will be addressed through the reduction- of square footage within Phase III or a parking study will be conducted by the Lewis. Canpany for the cer_!~ '(See Exhibit "E"), to justify a joiiNt use parking agrees,__At- III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Upon review of Part 1 of the Initial," Stu-1y and:completion of Part 2 of the Environmental Checklist,' staff has found no significant impacts related to a church facility within an Office/Business Park. PLANNING COMMISSIOp. STAFF REPORT CUP 91-17 - WILLOWS COMMUNITY CHURCH' June 26, 1991 Page A _ _�. FACTS FOR FINDINGS. The'�Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application: A. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Terra Vista Communi�Y in which e s ie'is located. B. That the proposed,use will noe be de ntal to the public P I health, safety or valfare, or materially` injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the,_"'oposed use complies with each of the applicable provisic` r'of the Terra "Vista Commun,fity Plan and the Develor,ent Code. r V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and;'%notices have been sent to adjacent property ' owners within 30v' fe.:t of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION:,.; Staff recommends that. the Planning /Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 91-17 through the adoption o the- attached Resolution -of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Res ll , ,E Bra 1 ,� Ci Planner BB:JG:jg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" Floor Plan Exhibit "D" Letter from Applicant Exhibit "E" Letter from Lewis Exhibit "F" - Parking-calculations �'-Z �' ` '=� cRANCNO CUCAMONGA CENTRAL PARK. BASE BOiD - 'y. ra -�.y `� •�' a��� r� r_""-yam' `_b LAB '4 _ ,r 'c • v�-r COTOTR 1�6 _QN4 �,` .1h� sz ..S T♦ow pNYON CANTON e f L� '• H SCHOOL TQWNHOUSL. 3'~M�:=r``♦ \� ?�SUNIOR MOM SCHOOL NONmwnT a - t t x ' crfi Sour RANT 1 MmtY.f'`a.�'Sf • a �.''�' ,. 4 +�lSi Udt1T; .. IAAlfi r��.�1 il.� �''+, _ T Cana FAR FAMILY VILLAGE t43 UNITS F O � ♦ _ 49 DENSf y HIGH T � i .rf �> lam-, c FOOTHILL BOULEVARD , Ay OF T "'A'1 3:.ICUCAN AGA ThIE:Site-1- I t um;r, PL,ANL6ti1��'r-F31VYSIGIJ � � 5 ExHMrr: A t� •scALE: J Y �a tt bC4:.l a Ill all < -�fill Ile r ? - J, /�•` 171 C. SV '. �/ J V ci r Q � _ a UCAMONc rr�c.E: �r- 1r�N PLANNING ION EJ Hmrr. SCALE. Neighbor:Copy w M m Shop ,z a . 78 W _ mz. O m m N O or nsu at overod Vdft oty $ _m in �� ®m It ♦ PR � x5' � Iry ��' � r�• ? $ 2� � Q (4 ft fire hai)way) a� 3 oco ' IN jF O - + t�� I �eigttvar:i;ectlsa0 SChao{t�iStTiCt� ' Offices AY OF CI UCAMONGA 'TTFi fi_ t r' lc4 r� N PLANMNPr I3, ISiON "L�^� EXHIBrr C SCALE: q, WILLOW Community y Church Evangefxaf Free Churches of A r,tca May 1,1991 To Whom It May Concern: SUBJECT:CUP TJ1EOWIN9 Concerning our proposed relocation intaSuites 118-122 at the Terra Vista Business Park, located at 10601 Church Avenue,ws inland to utilize the facilities as a church,with public assembly on weekends and/or weeknights,outside of normal business operating hours in ;_l the facility. The lsr�.a;t number of people we ceuid reasonably sect in our sanctuary would ba 280 In 1,960 sq,,of seating space,requir'rrg 58 parking spaces off bus¢less hours addmss= It"a possible we could have some esytime Bible Studies and meetings.Additionally,we will 8968 Archibard' rz aintain a church office in the facility during normal bus:'less hours. Atthe present1ime, Suite 30Q we have two,pastors using offices,and willt,e add/�d a:secretary/receptionist. 39pnc(w Cucamonga, We anticipate continuing to provide faciiities-l'orthe Chaffee Adult School's'�Mbmmy&Me" Car:fornia Gasses,meeting Monday-Friday bemeen the hours of 9 am and 2:30 pm.'Additionally,we 91730 will be working with ARISE Acadam j of the Arts,0asad in Nodh Pomona under the direction of Marlene Craig,to offer extension classes Monday through Friday'fron13:00 pinto 6:00 pm. These will not need more than the 32 spaces;ailon;,Nd to us for normal business hours; Phone(714y'- We are moving from our present location In the`Willows Pre' _o Center,on Arci-Obald south of 8th Street,in crderto occupya larger facility with more opportunity for significant 989 8553 ministry in the community.Currently,there is rpe-~ u-b Whe center of the city & Haven),and significantly,none in s 3 Terra or the wester Victoria project, f We see owselves working arm in aim with the;local schools,the YMCA,and the City to pasta`s: provide wholesome family activities and nurture. A special concem;we have is for single parens. d.. Dave kforz ,n Our sign,"Willows Community Church"wail be displayed on..hd building in accordance with farr�C> f., the Terra Vista Sign Code. Thank You for your consideration. Since ✓`:{" Forrest Hindiey ` Pastor Ji, ;1 47 r %' J Lewis Homes Management Corp. ; 11:6 Nonh Mounuin'kvonuo l P Uox 6701 Upluui,Gilliomio 917M � n 71045.0971 PAX 710494.,%r` August-27, 1990 Ms,� Anna Lisa He",aaO; Planning Department ' City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 00:" Ranch-;Cucamon a; Cal `91729 aElbv ZMIL$ FZTN2413 VIDTh braxNZ83 PARK Dear Annn Licas Lewis games supports the City9,e approval to alto" gamily Fitn&sas Center to Occupy space at._they` Torra-Vista Duoineea P We understand that «gars i.+s squglicient parking to allow t:Ie Health Spec lies within tht Park. WS also understand that by allowing dri® Health Club to, come into the park, there may not axist asUffIcUnt parking based an the amount of square rootage we had originally Projected in Phase Ill. Our intention is to submit a revised site plan Poi Phase 'lei, wither reducing the amount of square footage or requesting a shared parking concept From the City ,of Rancho Cucamonga. It you have any *further questions, Please co:Vaet %Q at (714)- 946-7337. Go��dia►lly, Fred Agui&19 Director of Commercial Development FA:cs . Iry OF g''..€�TCT�ICUCAMONG t; PLANIIN�C-- b SION TITLE ear c.» C.s'Fy,^� N EXHIBU: SCALE: � - a AdEk EXHIBIT 'IF' Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of,Use Footage Ratio �1, Required Provided (Health Club and Related Services); Health Club 15,230 1/150 102 Retail 900 _1/25D 4 Office 1,500 ;1/250 6 (= Chid Care 670 2 2 SUBTOTAL 114 � •,- (Leased Space) Office 5,392 22 Office 10,384 1/250 42 Office/Retail 1,928 1/250 8 Office 524 1/250 2 Medical 691 1/200 3 SUBTOTAL 77 S (Unleased Space) Office 47,452 1/250 190 Church 8,429 1/4 seats 60 34* (240 seats) SUBTCPAL 250 TOTAL 441 * Only 34 spaces are ^r,, ded during normal business`..tours. However, r, because of the natlp*e of the center most businesses, with the exception. of Family Fitness, will be closed evenings and weekends when church servi';,es will: be held. Otksr daytime school activities, such as Mommy & Me classes and ART;, Academy's,- art and meth-__ classes, will create a higher parking'demand,as discussed in staff, reporti i II-,F-Jo J. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA„ CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-17 FOR A CHURCH AND SCHOOL IN A LE7•SED SPACE OP 8,429 SQUARE FEET WITHIN AR EXISTING OFFICE PARK 1 _ ON 12.59 ACRES OF LAND IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ZONE, LOCATED AT 10601 CHURCH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN r SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 1077-421-31. A. Recitals. v (i Willow'n Co mmunity Chur ch,, Vas tor Fo mesh HindleYr has fil ed an application ;for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-17 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this RCsolution, the subject` Conditional Use Permit request is, 'referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th of June 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly n 'i::ed public hearing on the application. and concluded said 'hearing on than date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adopticn of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows.. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are,true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commissior during the above-referenced pubAc hearing on Jtne 26, 1991, including written raid oral staff rfports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 10601 Church Street with a street frontage of 711.95 feet and lot depth of 471.61 feet and is presently improved with four office buildings, and (b) ,The property to the north of the subject site is developed with Medium Residential attached dwelling unite (8-14 dwelling units per acre). The properties to the south, east, and west Ire vacant. (c) The applicant Proposes Fo to �operate a church with seating for 240, and with sgrvices held on weekends and wreeknights only. (d) The application also contemplates conducting Chaffey Adult School's "Mom & Me" classes on Monday through Friday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 2:30 .p.m. In addition, a variety of art classes will be . offered, including music, dance, and drams, Monday -through Friday ,from 3:00 P.M. to"5:00 p.m. 4-!1 PLANNING CCMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-17 - WILLOWS COMMUNITY CH[)RC1i ' June 26, 1991 Page 2 �} (a) A total of 32 parking a aces aze allocated space.. P for this lease 3. 3ased upon the substantial evidence presenfad to this Commission> dicing the above-referenced public hearing and upon the,specific findings,,of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission herebv finds and concludes as follows: (a) That,the proposed use is in accord with the `General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes oil the district, in which the site is located. (b) That the prapoeed use, together wit: the conditions applicable thereto, will not be",detrimental to the public health, @afety";_or welfare or materially injurious j aus to;properties or.„a.mprovements in the vicinity.- (a) That, the proposed use complies with each of the ,applicable Provisions of the Development-Code and Terra Vista Community Plan. 4. This Commis jn hereby finds and certifies that the project hal'i been reviewed and oonside:ad in compliance with the California Environmental•: Quality .Act of 1970 and, furthar, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions not forth in paragraphsAOL 1, 2, 3, and 4 aboii, this Commission hereby approver, the application subject to each and every condition sot forth below. _ f 1) Approval :of this request shall not ,waive compliance with all sections of the Terra Vista Community Plan, the Development Code, E-,,d'all other applicable Citv ordinances. 2) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, including, but not limited` to noise, the Cond itio nal Use Permit. shall be brought befogs , the Planning Commission for reconsideration and gossible termination of the use. 3) xcupancy of the facility shall not commence ug}_, such time as all Uniform Building Code J.Ixad State Fire Marshall's regulations have been ^_omplied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be;^submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4), Any signs proposed for thl, facility 'shall be designed in conformance wita the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and th9 Uniform Sign Program for c PLANNING COMMISSION" RESOLUTION r' , CUP '91-17 - WILLOWS COMMUNITY CftURCH June 26, 1991 Page 3 1 1: the' complex and shall require review and approval by the Design Review Committee pritpr to installation. r 5) The facility .ehall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as defined within the Terra Vista Community Plan and the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels. f 6) Church services or other public assembly (i.e., 50 or more persons) shall be allowed on weeknights after 5:30 p.m. and on weekends., 7) "Mommy & Me" cla sees .associated with the church use shall be limited to a maximum of 29 students and faculty members between the hours Of 8:00 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. This limit need .not apply to evening (after 5:30 p.m.) and weekend classes. In no event shall any other class offered exceed the available parking for this lease space. '9 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify Lo,-the adoption of this Resolution, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH-DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA l`I BY: Larry T. McNiel,.,Chairman 1 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary n I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of tf;O City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that" the foregoing Resolution was-duly and regularly introduced; passed, and adoptse by the Planning,:.Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular me king°of the:Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES., COMMISSIONEP3 F.BSENT: COMMISSIONERS; 14 -/3 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT _ f DATE: June 26, 1991 U TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller,; City Planner BY: Jerry Guarrecino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS AND TENTII-TIVE TRACT 14795, HANDAH INTERNATIONAL -,LA residential subdivision and design review for 13 condominium units on 1.23 acres. of land in the Medium Residential-District (8-14 dwelling units per acre);,;located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of the `extension of Hadrone Avenue - APN: 207-201-101 11, and 24. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 7 L PROJECT AND'SITE DESCRIPTION.- A. Action Requested: The approval, of the subdivision map and issuance of a Negative Declarations also, _approval of the ` conceptual plot plan: grading plan, landscape plan, and EI building elevations for 13 condcminium units. B. Project Density: 10.6 dwelling unitsper acre. C. Surrounding nand Use and'Zonin North - Vacant Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South •• Single family hoes and vacantt Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) 12� East - Vacanti Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units.per acre) West - Older single family home? Medium Residential (8- dwelling units per acre) D. General P1an,Desi9nationss Project Site•- Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite r— acre) North - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) ' South - `Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8-14"dwelling units per acre) West - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) t IT�1 I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT l... " Tr'14795 HP.NDISFi INTERNATIONAL June 2&, 1991 - Pagei E. Site Characteris�:ics: The;site, which is currently vacan£ +_ _. (' was formerly,occupied by three single family homes. The homes were razed some time_ago in'anticip.tion,of gentrification of the site. The property slopes slightly aouthwaru and contains no heritage trees as defined by City Code. F. Parking-alculat: ps:' Number of Number of Type Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Ratio Requirea _ Provided �< 1' three Bedroom 2.0/unit 26 26 Gua:;t .25/unit ;j 3 3 TOTAL 29 29 IL. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to develop 1's three-bedroom condominiums: Th4 two-story townhouse 'style0units feature 'l two-car extached garages with garage door openers, private' landscaped patios, 'concrete title roofs, and multi-pane windows,. Project amenities include a spa and cabana area with :concrete sun deck and lattice shade cover. A.''second: common area will provide an enclosed tot-lot, barbecues, And alpicnic area. other amenities'include interlocking pavers at the entrance and crosswalks, two trash enclosures, centralized mail .box strajtui'�,` decorative perimeter fencing, and a` driveway 'connection'to the adjacent westerly Site for future shared access. B. 'Design; Review Committee: The Committee (MoNiel, Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed the project on March 21 . 1991, and again on Miy 16, 1991. They recommender approval of the proposed project snb,X-at to the following conditions: .. II 1. A streetscape elevation should be provided to allow the full Commission to review the proportions of the entry. monumentation (see Exhibit "F-1"). 2. A' retaining wall shouLl. be jiovided, as originally suggested, to eliminate t�e slope behind Units' 8-10. Provide a minimum 3 foot at_*ar planter area between the perireter wall and the retaining wall. - _ 3. The block,wall'at the south end of the private yard for Units 1 and 13 should'be 6 fent high. 4. detail A-2/1 should be re�Ased to eliminate the expose wood pop-out trim; reflect this change consistently on all elevations. 5 . 1 !4 a PLANNING COMKISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14795 HANDAH INTERNATIe' .%L June 26, 1991 Page 3 J S. The private open space £or Units 7 and S sh+uld be increased,by moving the fencing out to the front entry.. 6 A connection to the public sidewalk should be provided, via`a 4-foot walk east of the driveway`, 7. A revised cabana plan should be ;provided',to include the following changes:, a. Place the spa equipment within the storage,room. 00m !i b. Provide a sink and lavatory in place of one shower. c. The shower need not be enclosed. The applicant has expressed a%willingness to comply with all of the,above recommendations and the, appropriate`conditions have been adder:to the attached Resolution. C. Technical Revise " Committee: t1 Thei Committee reviewed the-' project and determined that, together with the recommended Conditions of Appr.=ral the project is consistent with all applicable standard3 and ordinances. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Part IS of the Initial Study, .the Environmental Checklist, was completed. by staff. It was found that although the project may have a 'significant effect on the environment, there will nbt-:be a'significant effect if the following'mitigation measures, as identified.in Dart I of the Initial Study, are incorporated into the project design; '> le Noise;. The project is;, subject to significant noise impacts along Arrow Route. A preliminary acoustical study' has :been prepared which identifies mitigation measures needed to bring the site into conformance with City noise standards. A final acoustical report will: be submitted to °3entjry precise measures which must be incorporated L, final project design. i, ti. I 2. On Jane 7, 1959, the 'City` Council adopted Urgency Ordinance 395 which establishes-policy for a condition to be placed on all pending`residential projects to ensure adequate :school capacity.': This condition is included as Standard.Condition No. 5.' Staff r,commends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration subject to the above ;mitigation -treasures being added as Conditions of Approval for the pr6je&,'r .'t Y 7 , ti u r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14795 - HANUAR'-INTERNATIONAL June 25, 1S551 Page 4 -- -J III- FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is co,lsi'stent with,th ,General Plan and will not•be'detrime�ttal to adjacent properties or cause � significant environmental impacts. In adds ion, the prop-,sed use is in nomp3iance with the applicable provisions of the Develapment Code and City Standards. Iv. _ CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley.Daily Bulletin newspaper as-a public heaLting, the propertyt has been posted, and notices were sent to all'"property owners within 300 feet of the,project site ,--J1 V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning"Commission ? issue a mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Tentative Tract " 14795, and the related Design Reviewsubject to the Conditions of Approval, through adoption of the attached nesaolutions of Approval. Respec idly submitted, „ i r Brad ler City Planner BB•JG/jfs Attachments. Exhibit "A" -Site T3tilizationJ Exhibit '°B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" Conceptual Grading Plan'' 1 Exhibit "D" SitP PlaVL Exhibit "E" Conceptual Landscape,Plan Exhibit "F" -'Elevations .3xhibit "G" -'Floor Plans Resolution of Approval for TT14795' Resolution of Approval for Design Review of T714795 T C� :1 '4 ti F 1� 'r • � G j f IT I e r'{ • �i La 1�[:1{�ij. - rwaYuaK.. m-rrr+.,Ey. I r SITE UnWAMON MAP S i-T00'-0• _Y — j;s 8 2a-a COMiO DEVEL.OP&Ir-..ui T 4?9. AtdDAN iNYEN!!A'1TIONAL MC. 1-' t t 86-8844ARROW ROUTE 1 uarcrnsia PAMMFi—n—r. r "MI verr twa.enu ao. - F`u,E!CHO CUCAMONGA CA eee T•'"" rt!-wyFm lttuitlwnl. 2 9 Y OF F 0`ti UCAMONGA TrrLE;_ C T` PLANN�1 d B ICMTJ � EXHIB SCALE• .y lk a z da C �t r AN 3-M_ iSSYo w�8� Wm °�KF �3i3 F 1► Ii•,i� T: 3 -y3 n ,4.Mitz y3Rm4 o dit r.YX ^' tai.4an chi.a n., G 4".. S\ Mg / ^ a.•N^. 9 nxgg� t (� ��_ d Q�Q V Lo IL - � d °§ A C) u 1 _ O m—amp ! �,maoeteAa i W aF*.1..Q Y = , �i k air z 4� R N�qYr y—w 25 saY �6 a 'ySa 5q} tg� ":5 �b3s g W CTI ��� ��!� TJC. 'VIOi�TGA OF PLANING,61[�,ION �Tj-E LC'tI'Ait�F_ 71?�� N EXHIB :` " SCALE: Z- .. �. Cr Q F > ! Rm a a e e � �3_•� ¢r Z' m OF ZL SSF 96 t } E„ ( ,M. Da 'All U 9QraeLO rA LP gal cj is Ilk gag 00 1 � s l c L t9 Y ^ I 1 � t �3•�e� t gyp\ _ �. -T -....n,. a L+' C _ m i a t z� aom ab Una wm AD ran(•^�-"_------`-- f ; U�AI�IO�iT( R rrEM:_ iN�9s PLANNiN D ION Tt' 'f���. Ny EXHmrr.'�" ,,GALE- Z— i :; a ICINITY.MAP -re Typu 4R N A; }Mw 1 ��• `y- � ��t. {� t _—_ i ,� taEftlr.r _ }l(("!' PROJECT LOGATItMI .Tiv�i i oe^wli .fir w �. MiYIfM � P\oJLr.� �lMMrY +rn,w..na�ra4Mnr.+�w+ ; 7YM0.';i w���., tliRa\t. IC4 scp us.Ht�r..we o. .au..a � fltt►ff w: �.a�et<ro.�..�c. ttw.w.nVr ww ..� � u.+W1.aT'M wrto. a.ra.am.�nb.\q+sue+.v R.♦ K.K •� gaanarYr.aN♦♦ 6.4.tR► !L.LrLNr N —4....EfrNa-»a.rs.aw.+lsv t `' h+.�Y aAti wGct a 4,4M'r -wy. •.,.. � rwaTs�..wor u�r.ao...bt(� r►''' M�.'1r1L.1Mf MafY �..� i ra ',� TI♦r MM MI.YA`. »1.raF.Tgr s1 Y I IJ[RGd �Vf6' � r tiA •b'�1r MV�Yfe+ rr♦ ♦�•aY f .Mw V Tn_= 4 irrYnrla • y, �".♦ C.-c�+�C.<<a^�fie pia�5 ,�„' i -aate S• NA MAN lry$10Yw'.f116f1cT� ' Y OF # �# UCANi01lTGA ITEM, CIT PUNMNGG-DIMS101. TITLE: a lnv. ._ EX;iIBIT:,I; SCALE: ash M�i,�v11i111}�ay�. a �_ � re y' • A NL'1 • u ate; r\ � a-� �'�� i:. • ; I O 0 : r s'. r i M — S �t t t is cs — STE—i�T3Cp.�EIEVA":10Ci a AMk ..- MY OF 'ffl0:,-C- CANI0NTG "1TL,£ PLAN 114d' d:3 ON E.X�;"T:`F j SCALE: 'loumviono oH9Nvm t +Io..(�(a('D�v,.,Is.I.ay. I 3t!101d�natrar�+oQs caesl { ' • ( IaNI ire�arirweur.,ar�c�rN '5613�1 Li., sN�arao-�n3a am°7�,°•--��� tl f?�. � -: ti P .-y � � P 3 N �r I 4? l ,� �l �i�T/u� �^'f I �����p'`a ';�✓1�E� ,�jt�/�j�l ��- C�-' ��` t c�aa-i..P�q n.��aosm:mr}l�.t ffl. •.�.—.� un+ra'wwrown V�Y`�NOWtl. 2�i$�NaNdH rpan , ci.:.w's+laaw.p•wl�e 31l90NM!C�N�t�ti98 9EOB++ausYr "ruatW�s !+r irNol.tvNy�lrai`Hrarer �6L1y 6 .L3. eo'�Aaq oaN�a i 1Nr,�• ���� ,` r k J..Lt ' IT 1 4 rr t t 1 174 �■wrap .iiri�� Gaels— v S l \ I \ rg}t�• Tsars; ,� 1 {�,-- - �'FS �isi�1. I � _I st�r.■o■ 4 \ , saris \ x p I. 4. !f • - c�C.YtRNtf)i+st� .aeesnw+rocs VpYJNBL"�'�3RJa1+yHaa'F { � .43 =�e�w. w...n.•.i.o - 3u.rtoeeaomaasrse gzse(- SNI-lVNO11YNti33W1 HrOHgOFiONlUtiel tilH �9£LVL Li imwdO13/130 04V0o i1Nf1 Cs1.; El E ! 1 IR 1H a • C 4_. 4. 1 °.. MEN 4 �I lw Wo 110 Mali MAINE -': Imo/ ���.;.� -.r.�;r■o' - ;�1 6s.r GL �giieN 1 I lRENE Ilii • �i 'a LIM Nunn o.. f X yr .jY Y+Y 3 E•i� lo..et� — i� urrl�.! �1 _ s. I 'tom = ° J I^I •.■wset xf es - i� sw.t.tnrti=.y lau Y'J� �. ti mdat a OONOO JJNnct I. i x r' A` t t0pFi0iltt{I�i�'ItM•itiitttMl Jtttsnw.o«{ ;VO VONOWVOn O R�m 02 t amou moaav" a:1 s t , ° ONI�VNOI1VNtl31N1 HVONY '' $6��` �..�'i.JN3►VdO-GA3O OQNOOdtNR£ll TL .< rd - 1I isaaasin�ry�r-��n�sq.A i uA�117�v�w.s �• �i OPIIYiN.s+./oil, 'a, • Hi�Mi-IMi AgeA•a 1[i f s "Lf111iiA9l�I[L�ili>11[CMI xuS� Y tw2a^ 2� ='JNI lYNO[1YNtl3tHl HVQHL'6 - s�:,�1 •�,e.=�..7�M�'�A Q!INmiWfl.'Ct.#.i_ .�• I MMOMOMW AftL - ---- pi t { �_—��, !eM-[YilOt11 n+1'IOOFt12t1117P( � r'_� Y9. vf 'J11�QFCNI�t ' ( i 1 tit�ii•1Ni1i1i�A'yy1bC �". 31n5v MO t.31 -y F\ a .wr trnrr+w.rto1► L�2i11►F.i'i9-9zn J{� 1 i Q 1 � i i � 1 '3P1i IYNOIIYNH31(V!.YyaMYH Jr�L�"+�t .�.�. � �ly�OOtiO�.l�d11 Bl.�!I.I.I TT i 12 �, �e V ^' cacrc�a.�•rwacaurcxaa c!c� �. j , _ arr.mr�vouvraaatwi vdaav B6d4►! l rt ua3weo"W3(;GONOD umn 1 ' Ti �T 1 fi iS 1 �w wsr+ i •_� � i ` � 3 4 r � �C i ;Y14-iau -5 V".!V!)NordV'=QH'=!�Ili`�mnou MQNtlV k1'4d-g6j�4 dC'1-6la000N003 �'DN11tlNQI1VNtl31NFRYQNVH _ �� -- � Y - 1 7�1-0 JC1� ? 1991 P.C. AGENDA 5 0a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COM17ISSION OF THE CITY OF. RANCHO CUCRMUNG;a,,,CALIFORNIA,- APPRO,UING TENTATIVE' TRACT MAP NO. 14795, TOCETED AT 8626-44 ARROW ROUTE IN THE MEDIUM 'RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 ' DWELLING UNITS ,PER ACPS), AND MAKING FINDINGS) IN SUPPORT THEREOF ATN: 207-201-10, 11, AND 24. A. Recitals. (i) Handah International has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map ,No. 14795 as descried in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the.applicatith." (ii) On the 26th day of June 1991, the Planning Commission of the City' of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed, public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution .have Occurred. - - - B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is.hereby found, determ3,% d yfiS resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga aw fol'Ldws: 1. This Commission hereby specifically find'" that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct:. 2.. Based upon substantiak evidence-presented to :this `Commisaion during the above-referenced public hearing on June 26, 1991„including written and oral staff reportsp together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 8626-44 Arrow Route with a street 'ronta a of 192 feet and lot depth of 280' feet and is presently vacant; and (b) Tho proparty to the north,of the subject site is vacant, the Froperty to the mouth of the site consists of vacant and single family homes the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is a single,'family home. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence present%id to this Commissio^ during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth,in paragraphs I and 2 ahovv,:this Commission hereby,fit ds,and concludes as follows: t 1 ja) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and - 23; PL+NING COMMIddSION RESOLUTION NO. ; TT 14795 - HMMAH INTERNATIONAL June 26, 1991 Page 2 r :� (b) The 6esi n or improvements of the;: tentative tract is consistent with thv General Vlan, Development Code and epeorriW plana,•o,and (c) The site.is physically suitable for the type of de.v`�apment proposed; and (d) The design"'of tx subdivision is not likely se substantial environmental damage-'and;&_V�o or their habitat; and idable injury to humans, and wilt _ 7� (e) The tentative tract is not likely to &use serioua puW�. health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract i4il1'not conflict w J any easement acquired by the public at large, now of rSaeord, for access through it uGe of the przperty'with n, the proposed subdivision.,;; 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has i_en reviewed and considered in compliance with tbs -California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in parwf�;aphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition ;yet fortl4jbelow and in the'Standard Conditions, (, attached: hereto and incorporated herein`'by this reference. Eng negrina Division 1) The existing 9verhead utilities ('type to be determined during plL; check), on the project side of Arrow Route shall ba undergroundea from the pole-locateds at the west project boundary to the pole located at the east project boundary ,(polee to be removed). 2) Remove and replace the meandering sidewalk as necessary to construct the project drive approach. 3) Street trees shall be installed per 2nginearing standaMds. A street tree easement may 3e necessary where street. trees are 'placed on private property.; 6. , The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this .Resolution. .!"UNG COMMISSION RESOLUTION No f' TT 14795 - HANDAH INTEY2IYATIONAL' June.26, 1991 �( Page 3 ,. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH'DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larr,/T. MCNieI, Chairman --i ; r I ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commiasion df the' City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify ,that the foregoing Resolution was - duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning,Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular'meeting'of the Planning Commig, I }field on the 26th day of June�J.991, by"the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS. NOES: COMMISSIONERS:: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. `tS( DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPhGENT TANuAnu %CN Oft No ru%ITI%j N;;j sm 0" m r% PROJECT#: ( /4 7�-C1C SUBJECT: 1 APPLICANT: _ t�Cr h f i r LOCATION: Co: C Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE i:;44NNING DIVISION, (714)989.1661, FOii I.yOMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits e 1. Approval shall expire,unkass cxtes,�led by th*Planning Commission,if auiiding permits are —�—J not issued orapproved u& hasratoomtr?encedwithin 2e monlhsfromthedateofapproval. 2. Development/Design Review shag be'approved prior to_2 i 3. Approval of Tentat"Tract No. its granted subject to the approval of 4. The developershalloornmsrce.partk*metn,ifn M-4immateorcausetobecommenced, -J—l— partk7oated in,or corsurnmMed,a Wlo-Roos Comatwnity.Facilities District(CFV)for the Flancho Cucamonga Fire PrMudon Distrid to M cons niftn armor malme-fiance of a fire static^to sacve'the dovslopmant.The station shalt to located,desirgmed,and built to all specifications of the Rancho CucamoM Floe Protection 06-trkx,and shall aacome the Districts property upon oornpiMion, The equonent shag be selected by the District in accordance with its nesda. In any bu�dlng of a statio-il,the developer shall rorq ly with all applicable laws ark!regilations.The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation N the final reap occurs. S. Prior to racordatio'n of the 9,,1 map or the issuance of building permits,whichevar comes first,the applicant shag corm,*,A to, or participate in,the establishment of a Mei.'o Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school fadiiffes. However,ff any school d!strld has previously established such a Community Facilities District,the aoicant shall, in the alternative,consent to the annexation of the Project sBQ into time territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map ar tha issuance of building pem*s.whicfiewer comas first.Ftrrttrer,N the affected school / district has not fommd a Meka•Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project arkd prior to the recordation or the final map or issuance of building permits for:..aid prajaf,this condition shall be dbanmbu;mull and void. sC-1/9 aorta -T-Z� Comolcom Dam-. This condition shall be waived N the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6.Prior to rac mdation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved,writtan certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to servo the proposed_project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days priorto final map approval in the case of subdivision orpriorto issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B.Site Development I i. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with E ie'approved plans which —/__/_ incmde site plans, architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program. and grading;on file in the PlannVig Division,the conditions comalc:ed herein, Development Code regulations,and , Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to f-v sathfac Lion of the City Planner. _ 3. Occupancy of the facility shall nctcommenceun fit such time as all Unfform Building Code and State Fire Wrsnalt's relations have been coftoied wlth. Prior to cccupancy,plans shall I ba submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District aid tl ho BuWdg acid Safety iI Division to show compliance. The building shall be inbpected fo,-compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be --J 1_ submitted for City Planner riMew and approval prior to issuarm of building permits. .�/ 5. All site,grading,landscape,irrigation,and street f vementplansshallbecoordinatedfor ---/_! consistency priorto issuance of any permits(such as grading,tree removal,encroachment, building,etc.),or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or reproved use has commenced,whichever cones first .6. Approval of this rectuest shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development _!_J_ Cade,all other applicable City Ordinances,and applicable COMInunly Plana or Specific Plans in effect at the firm of Building Pefmft Issuance. 7.A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and _Jv/_ Shariff's Department(989-Mi 9)prior to the Issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate otyle,Illumination,kWon,height,and Method of shlelding sous not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash eepptacles are provided,aft trash pick-up shall be for individual units witf i all receptacles shlelded from public view. 9. Trash receptacte(s)are required and stall meet City Standards. The final design,locations, _J 1 and the number of trash receptacles shall be sub}act to Cky Ptsnrrer review and approval prior to issu,%'me Of building permits, t' 0.All ground-mounted utililyappuRenances such as transformers.AC condensers,etc.,shall —J--J_ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, terming,and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. sc-2/e1 2 of 12 y ^Z 7 TT 11A Compivion 11.Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. ✓_12.All b0ling numbers and individual units shall be Identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination. 13.A detailed plan indicating trail widths,maximum slopes,pi7ysical conditions,fencing,and _/--J_ weed control,in accordance with City Master Trail drr=rft.js,shall be submitted for City Plannerreview and approvalpriorto approval and recordationof the FinaiTr3ct Mapand prior to approval of street improvement andgrading plans.Developershall upgrade and construct all trans,including fencing and drainage dev;ot s,In conjunctk:n with street improvements. 14.The Covenants,Condit 6-as and Restrictions(CC&Rs)shall not prohibit the keeping of,equine J_J_ animals where zoning requirementeforthe keeping of said animals have been met.Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals withJut the necessity of appealing to boards of directo-s or homeowners'associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15.The Covenants,Conditions,and Restriotbns(CC&Rs) and,articles of Incorporation of the J_l_ Homeowners`Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Enginsering Divisions and the City Attorney.They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16.All parkways,open areas,and landscaping shall be permanently maintained bythe property owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of br,iiding permits. 17.Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the pursooe of assuming that each lot or —/ dwelling unit shall have the nbht to receive sunlight acro^zs adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system.The easements may be contained Ina Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be.mcorded corr..urrentiy with the recordation of the final map or issuance of pUrnits,whichever comes firit.The easements shah prGhW the casting of shadows by vegetation,structures,fixtures or any other object,except for utility wires and similar objects,pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 16.The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall bedovefoped and Je.!- maintained in accordance with the Historlo Widrnark Alteration Parrott No. Any further modiiizWmtofttas.0 including,but not!jmfted to.exterior alterations andlor interior alterations whiah affedthe exterlorof the buildings or structums,removal of landmark trees,demolition,relocation,reconstrx;tion of buiklings or structures,or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. ®ulidinp Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units J J_ and for heating any swimming pool or spa,unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equWalsnt capacity and of dency.All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. ,Details s` It be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City'Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. v 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment,detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner- review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. I SC-2/91 3of12 /—� PtQiW NO., : Cnmoie ate• _ 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners'Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Bwldirg Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Ali roof appurtenances,including air conditioners and other root mounted equipment and/or' _J-J— projecfions;shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally' integrated with the building design and const-mcted to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shalt be included in building plans.` D. Parking and vehicularAccesy(indicate details on building plans) ` 1. All parking lot landscapelsiandsshall have amininwm outside dimension of6 feet andshall —J_ i contain a 12•inch walk adjacent to the parking stall(including curb). �2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles she!!be .—J---J— providedthroughoutthe developmenito connect: spaces/ plazas/recreational unec. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles,. entrances,and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers 5. Th.?Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions shall restrictthestorageof recreational vehicles —J---�an his silo unless they are the principal source di transponatran for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designate+',1shor parking areas. 6. Plans for any securfty gates shall ba submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer,and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval priorto issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping(for publicly maintains landscape area refor to 5®ction N.) ✓ 1. A detailed landscape and Irrigation plan,inchx V slope platting and model home landscap —/ ing in the case of residential deveicpment, sitaN be pivpared by a licensed landscape archkoct and submitted for CityPfamw review and approval prior to the Issuance otbuilding permits or prior final map approval t, the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be Prss6rvQd In PlaW Shelf be protected w1h a construction barrier —/._/ in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110.and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those treestobe preserved Inplace and now locationsfortransplantedtrees shall be shown on the d3tai dlandsra plans.'The appilicant shag fo ow all of the arborisrs recomrn8nd2tiorrs regaf&V preservation,transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Aminimumof�treespergmssWm,conprisedofthefolWng sizes,shallbeprovided .—!J within the project:_ r' %-4g-inch box oriarpr, 5— %-38-Inch box or larger, 9'e 24.inch box or larger. '40 %-1 S gallon,and -9— %-5 gaWn. 4. A minimum of of trees planted within the`pMJeet shall be specimen size trees- _J_I 24-inch box or larger. 5. Wilhin parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three _I__ parking stalls,5ufficiend to shade SM of the parking area at solar noon on August 21- sc 2/91 4 or 12 1 -Z 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one Cgmpleoon Date: tree per 30 linear feet of ouriuing, 7. All private slope banks'S feeto'r less in vertical height and of 6:1 orgreaterslope,but lets Win � 2:1 slope,shall be,at minimum,irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting reyuiredby this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior,to occupancy. ✓ 8. All private slopes in excess of5 feet,but less than 8fest'ln vertical height and of2aorgrmater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows:one f 5-gallon or largersize tree per each 150 sq,ff,of slope area,l-gallon or larger stze shrub pereach 100 sq.ft.of slope area,and appropriate ground cover.In addition,slope bznks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon ur larger,size tree per each 250 sq.ft.of slope area.Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary sWOF4ane.Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residontial development,all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- ously maintained in a healthy and'Mvingeondflion bythedeveloperur tileachindividualunit Q is sold and occupied by the buyer.Priorto releasing occupancy for those unss,anInspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory ; condition: �•�10.For mutti-family residential and non-residential developmni,property owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all lartdscaped`areas on-site,as well as cmnUguous, planted areas'wlthin the public right-of-way. All lardsceped areas shall be kept froe frm weeds.and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving oondition, and shall s:cesve regular pruning,fertilizing,;mowing,and Mmming. Any damaged,dead, dls.'.used.or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the data of damage. 11.Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Developme it Cade and/or .This requirement shelf be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12.The final design of the perimeter parkways,wails,tertdscaping,and sidewalks shall be a included In the required landscape plarla and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated fbrconsistetcy with anyparkway landscaping pianwhich maybe required by the Engine ft Division. ; ✓ 13.Special landscape features such as►rounding,aNwfw rock,specimen size trees,meander- JJ Ing,Jr��.��jwalks(with horizontal change),anid trdensified ,Is required along ltKRr�c.,.) 14.Landscaping mid irtigation systems required to b"Installed within tha public right-of-way on / the perimeter of trds pmjM area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 15.All walls shag tsp:ovfdedwithdecorativetntatment.Iflocated In public maintenance areas, _J r the design shah be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16.Tree maintenance crilorla shall be develoW and subrtided for'City Planner review and JJ approval prior to issuance of building pemtks'. These crbrla shall encourage the natural / growth characteristics of the selected tree species. ✓ 17.Landscaping and irrigation shall bo designed to conserve water through the principles of —J—/ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Sc-2/91 5or12 ..1. —3Q TT W-Ir�t F.Signs Ompleum Date- . The signs indicated on the submitted plans are corceptual only and not a part of this,approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shalt fism require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to Installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of buiidinq permits. 3. Diractory monument sign(s)shall be provided for apartment,condominitim,ortownhomes _J prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.Environmantal 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Plannor,prior to accepting' cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted -�—�— Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault,in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. — 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice cf Vie Foothilltreeway J_ project in a standard format as determined by ts+e City Planner,prior to accepting a :.ash deposit on any property. fr 1/ 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the _J � Aft issuance of building permits. The final report:shale discuss the level of interior noise attenustionto below 45CNEL,the building materlatsand constntciion techniques provided, and it appropriate,verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures.The buiding&ns will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H.Other Agencies V 1. Emergency secondary access shall beprovkledina0drdancewth,,-An t- Cucamonga Fire --J—J ProtectionDistna Standards. 2. Emergency amss shall be provided.maintenarn.A free and elrr,amirdmumof2afeetwile At all times during censtttfotion in accorfarce with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to lsauance of buildkmg permits for combustl[W mnstrixtion. mvidenw shall be —/_!_ submmittedtotheRanchoCucamongaFireProtectionDistrictt.&tempora ;watersupplyfor fire protection Is available,pending completion of required fire protection system. 4. The appdfeant shag COMM the U.S.Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and eJ-l_ location of maii boxes.Mukl-family residential developmerst;shag provioe a solid overhead stntc:ure for mail boxes with adequate lightire.The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead stnxftre shag be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities,written certification of.am-aptability,including'61 =- gift ' supportive information,shall be obtained from the San Bernardino Cc...* Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to th;:. suance of Septic Tank Permits,and prior to issuance of building permits. S-2/91 eor12 ��3/ - �( ComRietion Dote: APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT TM::=,'IILDING AND SAFETY PIVtSION, (71,1) 989.1883, FOR COMPLIAP ICE WITH THE FouLOWI"G CONDITIONS: t.Site DDev elopment f. The t; applicant shall Comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code,Uniform Mechani- cal Code,Uniform Plumbing Code,National Electric Code,and all other applicable codes, ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building penT is for anew residential dwelling unit(s)or major addition --J--J to existing unit(s),the applicant shall paydevelopmentfees WV)e established rate.Such fees may include,but are not limited to:City Beautification Fee,Park Fee,Drainage Fee,Systems Developmant Fee,Permit and Plan Checking Fees,and School Fees. 3. Prior io issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or e/J_. addition to an existirvj development,the applicant shelf pay development fees at the established rate.Such fees may include,but are not limited to:Systems Development Fee, ZDrainage Fee,School Foes,Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4. Street addreeses Shall be provided by the Bui I[ding Official.aftertract/parcel map recordation and prior to Issuance of building permits J.Existing Structures 1. Provide corn liance with the Uniform I �p Butkiing Code for the property line Cie -�.—/— considering use,area,and fire-resisthrsness of existing buildings. _— 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for -�—/ the intended use or the building shall be damollshed. I Z3. Existing e wage disposal facilities shall be removed,filled andforcapped to comply with the _./_! / Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Buikiing Code. y 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and tihown on building plans submitted for J_J_ buiKng permit application. K.Grading ✓ 1. Gam subjecting of the subject propftV shall be In accordance with the Uniform Building Cade,City —J� ng Standards,and accepted grading practices.The final grading putt shall be in substantW confofe4arx* with the approved gad(ag plan. 2. A soils report snap be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to —J—J_ perform Such worts. 3. The development is located within the soli erosion control boundaries;a Sall i)isturbance —/—/ Permit Is required.Please contact San BernardinoCounly iDepartminlof Agriculture at(714) 387-2 i 91 for permit application.Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the imance of rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at ---�J— / the firm of application for grading plan check. y S. The final grading plans shall be Completed andapprovetip-," rfcissuance of building permits. _J_i_ SC-2/91 701`12 -T-3 2- "�T lylr;� Pr im Vo c«,;oi,o«,DIM _6. As a custom-lot subdivision,the following requirements shall bc,i met: a.Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site AIM drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisf&Uion of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map apprrivai and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b.Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto --J—J or over adjacent parcels,are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfacWn of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c.Omsite drainage improvements,necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided —�—� properties,are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for caarstructlon upon any parcel that maybe subject to drainage flows entering, leaving,or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d.Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety —� Division for approval priorto issuance otbuilding and grading pemtits.(This may bean an Incremental or oonapo:"m basis.) e.All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses --I—J— o planted with ground cover for erosion cordrot upon completion of grading or same other atternative method ofemsioncontrDi shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building OtlMai.In addition a permanent in:' ation system shall be provided. Thlc requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of SeC.ion 17.08.0401 of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE ENGiNEERiNGDIVISlQ% (714)299.1082.,FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING COPlOMNS: L.DWIation and vah3cular Accasra 1.Rights-of-way and easeavrt4e shall be dedicated to the City for-"=,rrterk—r aublic streets, community trails,public pasecs,public lawn dscmpe areas,street trees,and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Prbvate easements for non-public facilities(cross-lot drainage,local feeder trails,eEa.)shall be reserved as shown on the plans rnd/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be MOO Of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streF is (measured from street c6ntedney total feet on ctal feat on total feet on total feet on i 3. An it revocableofferof dedication for_foot wide m2 wakyeasementshallbemade for all private streets or drives. Z4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City f the following Streets: S. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs !_! or by deeds and shall be recorded c'oncurref y with the map or prior to the issuance of buildings permits,where no map is involved. sc-2/91 S of t3 T_ � :Pro,ecn No 6. Private drainaga easements for cross-lot drinage shall beprovided andshallbe delineated or noted on the final map. —J---J_L 7. The final map shall-clearly delineate a 10-foot minimumrt uilding restriction area on the neighboring Jot adjoining the zero lot line wail and conta)n tha following language: "UWe hereby dedicate tot 1 City of Rancho Curantonga the right to prohibit the construction of(residanti� buiidings(orpother structures)within those areas designated on the map as branding nestriction areas." 0 A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequrtclaimedof dellpeatedon —/_J / the final map. J 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City Wderever they encroach onto private property: 10.Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn tanes.to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the fade of curbs.N curb adjacent sidewalk is used aiortl the right turn lane,a pa.,Nllel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11.The developer shall make a good faith effort toaoqulre the requlmd off-she WopertyInterests _/_)_ necessary to construct the required public Improvements,and Who/she should fail to do so, the developer shall,at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map;^t approval,enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acqutresthe propertyr,-feats required forth.improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the devek"rof all costs intxirred by the City AM to acquire the off-stte property interests requlred lnconnoctionwiththe subdivision.Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form cif a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer,at developer's cost.The appraiser shalt have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M.-Street Improvements 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos, IandscapF;d areas,etc.)shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall lnelude,but are not limited to,curb and gutter,AC pavement,drive approaches,sIdewatks,street .and street trees. ?. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement,wkrAn a 40-toot%side dedicated right-of-way shall be � r� constructed for all half-section streets. 3. Construct IN fOtiowing perimeter street laiprovernents including,but not Rmited to. SMEETNAME CURB& A.C. SIDE DRIVE 9IMM M'r COIOL MEDIA,. OTHER GUMER PVb7r WAILS APPR. UGM IrREER fld ISLAND 2� ij i� SC-2/91 9cf 12 -3 y Notes: (a)Median island Includes landsrrr �and f ra,w�eoo :�• reconstruction and overlays will be detr�tined duringrogation c so meter. s Pavement y plan check. (c)If o marked,side- walk shall be curvilirgar per STD.304.(d)If so ma-,ked;an In-lieu of constructionfee shall be provided for this item. e) f c?m,-Z ✓ 4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans Including street trees and Street lights,prepared by areg!r,• J_Je tered Civil Engineer,shalt be submitted to and approve)by the City Engineer..Security shalt be posted and an agreement executed to the Satisfaction of the City-Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public andfor private street Improve- meMs,prforto final map approval orthe Issuance of building permits.whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public fight-of-way,fees shall be paid and a r" construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office In addition to any ottv7 permits required. c. Pavement striping,marking,traffic,;street name signing,and Interconnect conduit _/_._!_ shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduftwfth pull boxes shalibelnstaltedon any newconstructionorreconstruction of major.secondary or collector streets which l0tersW with other rt>*r,secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals.PUP boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at3 feet outside oft3CR,ECRorany other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1)All pull boxes shall be No.6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be Installed on OR four comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roasts requiring conrs antics shag remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detoursduringconstnxxion.Astreetclasure porn*maybe required.Acash deposit shall be}provided to cover the coat of gaff SW paving, which sham be refunded upon completion of the constnrtion to,the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Q. Concen ateddrainagefbwsshamnotamside"Ike.Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards,except for single family lots. h. Handicap rww ramp design shah be as spectfiad by the City Engineer. /_ I. Street mum Shall be approved by the City Platinerpriorto subrs7lttal for first plan check. S.Street•Improvement plane par City Smndards for all private streets shall be provided for J_J review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being perfom►ed on the,pd- vate streets, fees straM be paid and corpatWion permits site!be obtained from the City Engineers office in addition to nrry other permits required. I 6.Street trees a mintntum of 15�gallon size or larger,shag be installed per City JWndards in J-_J_ accordance with the Cgy's street tree program. SC-2/91 t0of1,2 _3s -r'T`I 4`1-ti5 / Pm'= o.• +' 7.Intersectiolt line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for ctnformance with Q�21etlon Day- adopted policy. a.On collector or larger streets,lines-of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, J—y Including driveways.Walls,signs,and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within.he lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noWeabliftyImproved,usually by e_ moving the 2+/-Closest street trees on each side awayfromthe street and plIced Ina street tree easement. 8..A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: 9.All public improvements on the following streets shall to gperatlonaily complete prior to the y� issuance of building permits: N.Public Maintenance Areas 1.A separate set of landscape and Irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards —L---/ shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval priorto final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.The following landscape parkways, medians,paseos,easements,trails,or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: >✓ 2.A signed consent and waiver form 3o joinandiorfom the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer pdarto final map approval or Issuance o4building permits whichever occurs first.Formation costs shall be home by the developer. 3.All required public landscaping and Irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the J_l developer until accepted by the City. 4.Parkway landscaping on the following street(s)shall conform to the results of the respective J_J_ Beautification Master Plan: 0.Drainage and Flood Control 1. The PrOWd(or portions thoreoi)Is located within a Flood Hazard Zone;therefore,food ---�—f Protection MUMS shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by dfe City Engineer. 2.It Shall i'fe th,3 demlopeps responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designations removed from the project area. The developers engineer shalt prepare all necessanr reports,plans,and hydrologio1hydrauec calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOWA)shah be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of boding permits,whichever occurs W.A Letter of Map Revision(LOlVIR)shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or Improvement acceptance,whichever occurs first. 3.A final drainage study shall be submitted'to and approved by the City Engineer prior 10 final map approvat or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. SC-2/91 t1of12 _ 3 6 "Proiect.V'o:• 4.A permlt from the County Fb^d Control District is required for work within lts right-of-way. �� 5.Trees are prohibited within 5 feet os the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. Aft .; 6.'Public storm drain easements sl,aifbe graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a"sump catch basin on the public street. P.U +es 1.Provide separate ut5ity services to each parcel Including sanitary sevJ,�rage system,water, gas,electric Flower,t0ephone,and cable TV(all underground)in accordance with the Utility Standards.Easements shall be provided as required;, �2-The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existirg utilities as necessary. J_J_ 3.Water and sewer plans shall bL designed and constructed to rwet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District(CCWD).Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Envirommental haalth Department of the County of San Bdrn2rdino.A letter of - compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occutl first. Q.General Requiremerfta and Approvals ' ` 7.The separateparcels'Lontaineciwithin the —f-1 proIect boundaries shall be legally wrrnftned Into one parcel prior to Issuance of bulldiraji permits. 2.An easement for i joint use driveway shalt be provfOad prior to final map Val or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first,for_jZt Vi ,e,,7,xj 3.Prior to approval of the final map a deposit.shall be posted with the CRy covering the " estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the rw,,Yly created parcels. 4.EtiwandalSan Sevalne Area Regional Mairf he,Secondary Regional.and Master Plan Drainvie Fees shall be paid pdorto final mapapymiraliorpriorto building permit IssuanceJ no map is involved. S.Permits shall be 4btak*d from the foRowing agencies€orwo*1 within their right-of-way; 6.A signed conserit Mid wa!var form to join andfor forum the Law Erift vament Community Fart cries C1,41iric shall be flied with the City Engineer prior to final map r oproval or the issuance of building permits.whkhffver occurs f rst Fsrrnation coats shall be farm by the Developed 7. Prior to finalization of any development phase,�uftkcier4 improvement pions sty be com• —J / . Plated b®yond:the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Ergineer.Phase boundaries shag correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative rnap, SC:-2/91 12ort2 .^3 I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE.•CITY OF `RANCHO CUCAMONGA,-CALIFORNIA, APPROVING. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 11795, LOCATED AT 8626-44 ARROW:ROUTE IN THE MEDIUM RESIDEk�,'TIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT 'THEREOF - APN: 207-201-10,,11, AND 24. A. Recitals. (i) Handah International has filed an, application for Review of Tract No. 14795 as described in the title "of this Reeol�tion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is ref�'rred to as "the application." (ii) On. the 26th day of June 1991, the: Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption oF';his Resolution -gave occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and zesolved by the Flanning Commission of the City of Rancho,Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby opecifically finds C, - all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution ar^' i and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented 6gs Cawmiseion during the above-referenced meeting on June 26, 1991, indtua-;.g written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project` is consistent with the objectives of the General.Plan; and (b) That the proposed de-ign is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purpozes of.the.district in which the site is Located; and (c) That.the proposed design in,in compliance with each of the applicable provsions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, �_11. not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially inji'r;',,ous to properties or improvements in'the vicinity.;' 3. Based ugk7n ti, "ndings and concloeions not forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this `Araby approves the application subject to each and every condition set fox-.r.)elow and in the standard Conditions,- attached` hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. �- c J 30c, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION hp. ; DR FOR TT 14795 RANDAH INTERNATIONAL June 26, 1991 - Page 2 -i� f 1. A final acoustical study shall be pirepared.;and submitted„ for review prior to issuance o£ building permits. The study shall address the ' noise generated along Arrow Route rind shall ` identify r mitigation measures to, be incorporated into the final projo-`; dosign. 2. A retaining wall shall be prov'. F-in,order to f" 0eliminate' the slope be'aind Units 8-10.-. Provide a minimum 3--foot clear planter. area between the perimeter,Wall and the Xotaining w&11•. 3. The block wail at the south end of,tht priv to yard for Units 1 and. 13 shall !be 6 feet h1�Yi. 4. The private C /'`space for Units 7 and 8 shall be increased ma°ing the fencing out..to the front entry S S. A connsa fha public sidewalk shall be provida4,,/'via a 4-foot walk east of the driveway. 6. A revised cabana plan shall be provided for staff 3.sw and include_. the follworfng changes: a. Place the spa equipmept within the storage room. b. Provide a *tnk and lavatory in place of one •Rhows C. The shower need not he enclosed.. 7. Property Naintenance: Property owners are . =J iesponsibiSt for the continuous maintenance;df all buildings, structures, yarda,.landscapil:a, signs, parking grans, recrecti,onal facilities, and other improvements in a manner which-doen not detract Prom''= the appearance of- the surrounding areas. In addition, Multiple Family Residential Developments subject to the DeveloFment/Design Review process shall maintain site improvements in compliance with all applicable Conditions of Approval impbsed by the Planning Commission. TANNING COMMISSION RESMUTIO151 M \ ,P* FOR TT 14795 -- HANDAfi INTERNATIONAL June'-26,, 1991 Page 3 rr B. Visitor Pazking: Visitor parking shall be clearly, delineated through proper signage to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Sgnage may include, but is not limiter to: individually labeling each parking stall with the words "Visitor Parking" f,on ttie pavement surfacs, free-standing signs designating the stalls; as visitor parking, and directory Sig::s .. \guiding visitors to'tl!e visitor parking area. 4.1 The Secretary to this Commission shall `certify'the adoption of this Resol%iUon. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE,199i. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO &CBMONF& r: BY: r Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: ' Brad Buller, Secretary 1 i I, Brad Buller, .Secretary of the Planning"µ commission,of the' City of Ra21cii1 Cucamonga, <do hareby certtify that the foregoing Resolut�lon xas `duly and­,, regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co;+misson of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the;Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 1991. by the following vote-to-:wit. AYES: COMMISSIONW.3— NOES. COAamxssimERS:- ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ft.:. DEPARTMENT OF C04Yt our COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,'083TAN" DAFFILD' CrONDITIONS PROJECT#: 11-A-'55 _ SUBJECT: APPLICANT: IJ;[_✓ Ln !^'C"r1a ^✓1 �1-tV�. LOCATION: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714)ses-1ari1, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:- A. Time Limits AMIN 1. Approval shall expire,unless extended by the Planning Commission,if building pewits are —�—J not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 monthsfromthe date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to L I 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval ut �J _ 4. The developershall commence,participate in,andoc'nsumm4teorcause to be commenced, Participated In,or consummated.a Mello-Roos Cormr nfty Facilities District(CFD)for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction"or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The sMisn shall be located,dsslgrted,and built to all specifications of the Rare Cucamonga Fire Proteat an District,and shall become the Districts'property upon completion. The equfpmSrrt iw ,.f?a e:elocted by the District in ' accordance with its needs. In any buk tng of a elation,thq Ovelopershall Comply with all ap!;Ikable laws and radulations.The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. S. Prior to r N*rdatlon of Oise ,fins(map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes P first,the applicant':.han consent to, or participate In,the ostabiishma►s of a Mella-Roos Community Facilities; DWrict for the construction and main tenance of rrECes€emry school facilities. Hovrevsl{w i i,arty.school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District,610 applicant shalt, In the alternative,consent to the anmexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of baitding permits,whichever combs first.Further.9 the affected school district has not tormt d a Mello-Flocs Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval.of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits t , said project,this condition shalt be deemed sell and void. sc-2/9t t,ariz Z-y'� pmle Ne.• This condition shall be waived if the City teceives notice that the applicant and all affectad school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and ail sctviol impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to reef*dation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no n;:p is rirJ_ involved,written certification from the affected water district that adequate newer and i-pater facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project sha7 be submitted;;J the 111 Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been Issued by miter district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case uf subdivision orpriortc issuance of permits in the case of all other residential pajects. S.Site Development _IZI' 1. The site stiall be developed and maintained in accordanm wlth'the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevaticns,exterior materials and colors.landscaping,sign Program, and grading on file in tha Planning Division,the conditions containgti herein, Development Code regulations,and ___Specific P►an,wid Planned Community. 2. Prior fo any use of the project site br hus'ness activiry being commenced thereon, all __J I Conditions of Approval shall be completed to th9 satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancyof the facility shall notcommence until suchtimeas all Uniform Building Code and _J__J State Fire Marshaift regulations have been compiled with.Prior to occupancy,plans shad be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire]Prc`section District and the Building and Safety Division to show, compliance. The Wilding shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. Aft 4. Revised site plays and building elevations Incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _J___J submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. t/ 5. All site,grading,landscape,irrigation,and street improoVment plans shall becoordinatedtor —J--� consisteeicypriortoissuanceofanyperaft(such as gtadirrg,treslemovai,encroachmeni, building,etc.),or prior to fine'-mV•c9provai In the 1=8 all a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commermw.whichever comes fintt. G. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance vr'ih all actions of the Development :ode:all other applicable 011y Ordinances.and appb'able Cowmi uri y Plans er Spec.lo Plans in effect at the time of l,fuWJng Permit fs :attCo;' 7. A detailed on-site Iigftting plant shall be review,ad aWl approved by the City Planner and ,Sherilf's Department(58MI t)prior to the lasugrvA of':Niicsrtg permits. Such plan shall Indicate style.illumination,location,height,and frw lod of shielding so as rot to adversely affect adjacerit properties. 8. If no centralized tw4h receptacles are provkkid,all Mh pkk-up shall be for Individual units _._J t_ with a4 receptaraes shielded from pubkt view. 9. Trash receptacle(s)are requ4•ed and Shah meet Cty . The final deeign,locations,, J Cnd the number of trash receptacles shall be srlr(ect to City P1,4 per reviser and approval prior to issuance of building permits. ✓ ti 0.All ground-mounted k,iilrty appurtenances such as transformers,AC condensers,etc.,shall J be located out of rabl':c f ew and adequately screemid Ahrough the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, andlof Landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. sc•2/91 x of 12 Qompkd,n Dam, 11.Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12.All building numbers and individual units shall be,dentilha in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13.A detailed plan indicating trail widths,maximum slopes,physical conditions,fencing,and J /� weed control,�n accordance with City Master Trail drawings,shall be submitted for City Pa3nner review and approval priorto approvaland recotdationof the Final Tract`Aapand prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans.Devetopershali upnradi and construct all traits,including fencing and drainage devices,in conjunction with s'lreet improvements. 14.The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions(CCBRs)shall not pmhibitthe keeping of equine _1_! animals wherezonIng requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met.Individual lot owner in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals withoutthenecessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners'associations for amendments to the CCI&Rs. 15.The Covenan ts,Conditions and Restrictions �I (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of the Pia: ymg and E"rgineering Divisions and the City Attorney.They shall be recorded concufrentirv,:ill the Final Map or prior to the iss tans of building permits-whichever ju;r3 first,A recorded;copy shall be provided to the`City Engineer. ✓16.Allparkways,open areas,and landscaping shall bepemmanentlymaintafned bytheproperty _/ 1 owner, homeowners,association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval pr+r to issuance of building permits. 17.Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system.The easements may contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently whh the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits,whichever cornea first.The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation,structures,flx-!res orany other except for utility wires and similar objects,pursuant to Development Code;S,sctlon 17.08.060-G-2. 1 S.The pnoject contains a?tp,mated Historical Lanidmak The site shall be developed and � J maintained in acoort: -zls with the Historic Landmark Akeratien_permit No. . Any further ncdificaljomto the she Including,but not W4ed to.exterlorafterations and/or inter'sratteratlonsw1ill6haffoatheextedorof the bufidln;,p�QWurn-jj rentoraloflandmark trees,demolition,setoeaYion,rnsttuctionof bufldini/,or structures,orchanges to the site, shall requires a modification to the History La^dn*fk Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative^-tergy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units _J._J and for heating any swimming pool or spa,unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efflow)CY.All switnming pools Installed at the: time of Inhiai development shad be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plants and shall be submitted for City Planner reviewr and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. ►�" 2. All dwellings shall have the trout, sideand rear elevations upgraded with architecturaltre review nrld approval prior issuance of building permits.treatment subject to City Planner detailing and pP P� SC-2/91 3 of 12 _u3 NQ—t Va., Comdedon Due: 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners'Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building official review,andrapproval prior to issuance of building permits: f 4. All roof appurtenance: 'Ding air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/cr _J_J._f projectka ls,shall be shle�,._sfrom view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Panning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. 9. Parking and Vehicular Access(indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimehsion of 6 feet and shall contain`-�.12•Inch wak adjacentto the parking stall(including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured Pevement across circulation aisles shall be --/—� provided throughout the developmentto connect dweliings/units/buildingswith open spaces/ plazastrecreational uses: 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances,and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers it driveways are less than.113 foal in JJ� depth from back of sidewalk t I 5. The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict thesiorageof recreational vehicles t—J on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit Parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be Submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer,and .—.L__( Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approvalprbrto Issuance of bs!ikfir permits. 1r E. landscaping(for publicly malyd alned tit areas reserto Section N.) �1. A detailed la ndscape and irrigation plan,irtclud'Ag slope plartirg and model home landscap- _J—J_ ing in the case;n--3sldentlal developer m,"shalt be prepared by a licensed landscape architect aubiAttedforCky Piarmer TwAawand approval prlorto the issuanceot building permits cr prior final map approval in the case of a custom M essbdvision. 2. Existing trees roWked to be preserved In place shall be protected with a construction barrier —J--J_ in z=niancef with ftMurk*WCode Section19.08.1f0.and so noted ohthe grading plans. The locatlan Of those tree$to be preserved In place and nevi locatkw eortransplantted trees shall be shown onthedetalledlandscepeplans.The&apf lMshallfallow all Ofthearborist's recOmmsndatiora3 regarding Preservation,transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Aminimumof y< tfmpergmssacm,cOmPrWWOfthetaflowingsizes,shall beprovided - J-1 within the project: %-48-Inch box orlargefr,._ %-36.kWh box orlarger, �2y %-24-irtclt box or larger,_' U %-15-galon,and �0" %-5 gallon. 4. A mart mum of of trees planted within the project shall be specimen sire trees- _J_/ 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of,one 15-9allon tree for every three parking stalls,sufPrclent to shade 5076 of the parking area at solar neon on August 21. SC 2/91 4of18 Tom! Emmi NO 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. i!7. Allprivate slope banks 5 feet or less In vertical height and of 5:1 orgreaters$ope,bu t less than 2:1 slope,shall be,at minimum,Irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a perrnan-^:<drrigation .y" system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. J B. All private Mopes in excess of5 feet,butless than 8feet inveftical height andof2.1orgreater �--> slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to5oftentheir appearance as follows:one 15-gallon or larger size tree par each ISO sq.ft.of singe area,t-gallonor larger size shrub pereach 100 Sq.ft.ofskipe area,and appropriate ground cover.In additicn,4lope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also Include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft,of slope area.Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered cluster))to soften and vary!:lope plane.Slope planting required by this s6rction shelf include a permanent Irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential deiielopment,ail stepe planting and irrigation shall be cordinu- ously maintained Ina healthyanui thrtvingcondition bythe developer until each Individual unt is sold and occupied by the buyeL Priorto releasing occupancytorthose units,aninspect;on shall be conducted by the Planwing Division to determine that they are in satisfactory /f condition. !� 10.For mult-familyresidential and non-reskfentiat development, ekpment,Property owners are respon- `./—J siible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site,as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. Ail landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a heathy and t uwfrtd condition, and shall receive regular pruning,fertilizing, mowing, and trimming.,Any damaged, dead,diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11.Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and%r„ This requirement shall be in addition to ilia required street trees and slope planting. V 12.The final design of the perimeter parkwvav;LwpIlI .,landscaping,and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans vid stoat be sub}ect to Cky Planner review and approval andcoordinatedtorconsistonaywthanypaikway landscapingplanwh&fimaybe. required by the Engineering Division. 13.Special landscape features such as Mounding,alluvial rock,spaciitten size trees,meander- �/J_ change),and kttensified harxiscaplog,is rewired along 14.landscaping and iir 0lon system rersr;ed to be installed withir the public right-of-way on -_J_/ the perimeter of this project aril shall be continuously malntal lad by the developer. 1 S.All'walls shall be provided with decorative treatment.It located In public maintenance areas, the design shelf be coordinated with the Enpirisering Division. 16.Tree maintenance criteria shalt be developed and submitted for City Planner review and _/—! approval prior to issuance of building permits: Tttetie ctkeda shall enrage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 17.Landscaping apd Irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of ___i___l` f xerfscape;,s der-red in Ch apter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Mun'icapal Coda. SC-Z/91 Bo[12 I-L�fjr PMJM ao.• F.Sign.- SBmdevon o.e• >✓ 1. The signs indicated onthe submitted plans are conceptual only and not a partof this approval. AML Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shad Mill require separate application and approval by the Planning Division priortoinstallafwn or any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program forthis development shall be submitted for City Planner review and _J_J_ approval prior to issuance of blinding permits, 3.Directory monument sign(s)shall be provPled for apartment,condominium,or townhomes _J_! prior to occupancy and shall require separate application :aria'approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.Environmental 1., The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Firth Street Rock Crusher project Ina standard format as determined by the City Planner`;p_, rto accepting 2 cash deposit on any property, 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice ifi ttvl City Adopted -�- Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill FauIS, in a standard format as de�vminetl by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. - 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway _!._./_ project in a standards format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the J_J_ issuance of bultding permits. The final report shall discuss the level of Interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL,the building materials and construction techniques provided, and If appropriate.verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures.Tiie building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained In the final report. H.Other Agencies 1. EEmeMencysecondaryaccessshallbeprowdedInacoordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire —� — Protection Lion Disirict Standards. ,2. Emergency access Shall be provided,maintenance free and clear.a mltlnwmof26feetwloe J—J_ at all times during Constrtfction in accordance with Rancho Cucanronga Fire Protection,' District requirements. 3. Prior to Issuance of building permits for combustible constriction, evidence shall be s/ / submltodtothe Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection DistrIctthattemparary water supply for fire protection Is available,Residing completion of requirdti fire protection system. 4. The applicant shall ConlM the U.S.Postal Service to determine the appropriate type acid —]__J_ location of mail boxes.Multifamily reskiennal developments shall provide a solid overhead stricture for mall boxes with adequate"Ing.The fi W location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead sln.+=re shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building peraWs. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities,written certification of acceptability,including all f� supportive information,shall be obtained from the San Bernardino CcuMy Department of 1 Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits.and prior to issuance of building permits. S•2/91` S or12 pmmm NO., Complecon Date! APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION,'(714) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1.Site Development 1. The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted Uniform Building t,ode,UnNorrm Mechani- cal Code,Uniform Plumbing Code,National Electric Code,and all other applicable codes, ordinances,and Fegulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact tnr wilding and Safety Division for copes of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building pembts for a new residential dweiling unif(s)or ma�Or.addition ��-- to existingunit(s),the applicant shall pay developmentfees at established rate.Ouch fees may include;out are not limited to:City BeautitioationFee.Park Fee,Drainage Fee,Systems Development Fee,Permit and PlanChed drag Fels,and School.Fees. " 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or Indust iod development or '.J__J addition to an existing development,the applicant shall pay,development fees at the established rate.Such fees may include,but are not limited to:Systems De'retopment Fee, Drainage Fee,School Fees,Permit and Pt h Chechdng Fees. - 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official,aftertract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J.Existing,Structures 1. Provide e*mpliance with the Uniform Building C*ft for the property line clearances considering use,a,7.a,and fire-resistiveness of existing bulkRV 2. Existing buildings shall be made to cormAj with correct building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished, f 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities sha.be removed,fed andlorcapped to comply with the Uniform Pluming Code and Uniform Bulkling.Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and Viown on bulk tp plans submitted for building permit application. K.Grading 1. Grading of the subect property shall be in accordance with the Unform Buiigng Code,City --� Grading Standards,and accepted grading practices.The final grading plltmn shalt be in substantial conformance with the approved grading piers. 2. A soils report shay be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by ttte State of California to perform such such work, 3. The development Is located within the soil erosison control boundaries:a Son Disturbance Permit Is required.Please contact San BernardinoCountyy Departmental!Agriculture at(714) 387-2111 for pentrtapplication.Documentation of such permit sltagbesubmitted totheGity prior to the Issuance of rough grading pemng. 4. A geofog r.-If report shall be prepared by a quaMMd engineer or geolotfst and submitted at /11116 the time of application for grading plan check. y 5. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved pftrto Issuanw of building permits. �—�— SC-2/et 70f12 --q7 r' - - CocnDletioe Dile• 6. Asa cuSIOM-lot subdivision,the following requirements shall be met. a.Surety shall ba posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site --�—� drainage facilltiesnecessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfacton of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and priorto the imance of grading pem Is. b.Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted'onto J— r. aver adjacent parcels,are to he delineated and recorded to the satisfaction o:the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of;grading and building permits. c.On-site drainage improvements,necessary for dewatering and protecting the sybdivided --j-- properties,are to be installed prior f'"ssuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to aratnage flows entering, leaving,or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d.Final grading plan,3 for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety —j—-�— Division for approval prior to Issuance of building and grading pemtits.(This may be on ar inemmentalor ooivosite basis.) e.All slope banks in excess of 5 feet In vertical height shall be seecW with native grasses or planted with ground coverfor erosion control upon c:)mptation of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control,shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official.in addition a permanent irrigation system :shall be provided. This requirement does not release the appticanu/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.0401 of the Development Code. APPLICANTSHALLCONTACTTHE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (d14)989-1862,FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L Dedication and Vehicular Access i.Rights-of-way and easements shag be dedicated to the City for all Interior public streets, community trails,public pase0s,public larKWcape areas,street trees,and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans arxvortentative map. Private easements tar non-public facilities(cross-lot drainage,local feeder trails,etc.)shalt be reservers as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. ✓, 2. Dedication shall be made of the following righ;ts•of-way on the 'perirtloter streets J (measured from street canterline): total teat an total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made JJ for all private Street%or drives. ff 4. Non-vehicular accafs shag be dedicated to.the Cky for the following streei$: v S. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CCBRs 1- or by deeds and shag be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits,where no map is involved. S-2191 aorta - C/ = pry TT 6. Private drainage easements forcross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated cm°reao t5"` or noted on the final map. _J_J AQ 7. The fkal map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction area on the r/_J neighboring tot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: 'Ubve hereby dodkete to the City o,Rancho Cucarnonga the right to prohibit the construction o (residential)buildings(or other structures)within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas. ` A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CCBR's. za. All existing easements lyingwhhinfuturerights-of-way shall bs quitclaimed ordellneatedon the final map. +' 9. Easements for public skfawaks and/or street trees placed outside the public right W-way Jam_ shalt be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10.Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along righttum lanes,to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the fan of curbs.If curb adjacent sidewalk Is used along the right turn taus,a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. _ 11.The developershall make a goodlafth effort to acquire the required off-ae property irderd'O',P., _,J—.-/_ necessary to-construct the required pubile!mprovemeats,and If he/she should fail to do so, <- the developer shall,at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval,enter into an agreement to complUe the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 6W2 at such time asthe City acquires the propitty Interests required forthei,�npmvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the develpperof all costs incurs t t"'C71y to acquire the off-sits property Interests requlredincarmoftnwith the subdivision.SeWrP.y for a portion of these costs shall be In the form of a cash deposit in the arriount given In an appraisal report obtained by the developer,at deve"ra cost.The appraiser shz!i have been approved by the City prior t6commel:8MOM cf the apr,r al. M.Street improvennerlts 1. All public Improvements(Into'&;streets,drakmge facilities,community trails,passeos, landscaped areas,etc)shown on the plans and*tentMW map St WH h9 constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvemes,s stw Hsdudo,but arc not i niffed to,curb and gutter,AC pavement.drive approaches,sides dM.Strom Mots,and street Imes. 2. A minimurn of 26-foot wide pmanterd,within a40-foot wine dedbated right-of-way shall the constructed for all hat-section streets. 3. Constant the following perimeter street improvements Inclt4n2,but not limited to: STREET'NAM CUFM e: A.C. SIDE DRIVE 'BIT= SrR= Cot+4M.WMIAN Otrt9R PV?Rr WALK APPR. UGH79 `!BEES TRAIL. IS AHD 011iER ie olo C� SC-2/9i i 9af12 �RlIIS�S-S140.i?1. : Notes:.(a)Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter,(b)pavement reconstruction and overlays will be detetmined during plan check. (c)If so marked,side- walk shall be curvilinearper STD.304.(d)It so marked,an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this hem. ,�.„ Jlr; �� Gyp :oc�•�e Ltv�f� t���iQ.CO_ ,,,r?�l f• rt:� ff L:","T�� _ 4. Improvement plans and core suction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights,prepared by aregis- tered Civil Engineer,shalt be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public arxitor private street Improve- ments,prior to final map approvatortha Issuance of building permits,which eroccurs first. b. Prior to any wort,being performed in public right-of-way,fees shall be paid and a ��— construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office inadditionloany other permits required. c. Pavement striping,marking,traffic,street name signing,and Interconnect conduit Jam_ shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduftwkh pull boxes shall be Installed on arty new constnictionorrecoTWruction _J_1— of major,secondary or celiector streeti�!it h intersectwith oihermajoE,secondary or collactor streets for future tratlic signals.Puff boxes shall be placed on both sides of the streetat3 feet outside of BCR,ECRoranyotheriocsiions approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1)All pull boxes shall be No'6-,iniess otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduft shall be 3-Inch gaivaiilzed steel with pulfrope, e. Wheal chair ramps shall be installed kzkall four corners of Intersections per City Standards or or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requirftconsi u tion shall remain open to trdfflc at ell times weitit; adequate detours duringconstnx',lion.A street closure pemnit may be requkW.Acash deposit shad be provided to cover the cost of grading and Raving, wrhich$hag be refunded upon completion of ttte c onstufflon to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated dralit p fkM$hail not cross sidewaks.Under sidewalk drains ehall be __J_J installed to City Standards,except for siitigle family lots. n. Handicap access ramp desk;r shall be as .�ified by the Cky Engineer. I. SUM names SW be approved by One City Plancterprw-ijowAxWal for timt plan check. _J._J—, S.Street Improvement plane 4er City Standards for as prWe streets shag be provided for I-J review and approval by the City Engineer. Prkw to any work being performed on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction peitriits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. 6.Street trees,a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger,shall he installed per City Standards in: _/_I accordance writh the Cityi's street tree program. SC-2/91 10 of 12 Prom so.. 7.Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the CityE iei`oo„° - adoptedpolicy.- nginePrforconformanceu;itho a MW a. On collector or largerstreets,lines of sight shall be plotted for all pro,..K intersections, --�- including driveways.Waits,signs,and slopes shall be located Outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeabiity improved,usually by moving the2+/-closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a stmet tree easement. B.A permit shall be obtaineu from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: 9.All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the --J J_ issuance of building permits; N.Public Maintenance Arm I.A separate set of(srtdscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of buftig permits,whichever occurs first.T he following landscape parkways, medians,Pasrros,easements, trails,or other areas are required to be annexed into,the Landscape Maintenance District: 2.A signed consent and walverfom to 10M dnd/orformthe appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City E 4Veerpriortofinair iapapprovalorissuanceofbuilding permits whichever occurs first.Forrratlfkn costs shall to borne by the developee. _ 3.All required public landscaping and Irrigation"ems st%1ibecontinueusly maintained bythe _/J developer until accepted by the City. —4.Parkway landscaping on the following street(a)shag conform to the results of the respective � r Beautification Master Plan: --- i O.DmInags and Fk)od Korn;--9 —t. The project(or portions thereof)ip located within a Fi fed Hazard Zone;therefore,flood -�—/ protection measures shad be PrOY3,od as certified by a reg;aiered Civil Engineer arid. approved by the CHy Englnee:. -- 2.It shal(.1)s the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone desig='-q removed from the project area. the developer's n gktoer stroll pmPare all necessary reports,plans,and hydrologicthydrauic calculations. A Conditional.Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR)shah be obtained'fram FEMA pdor;o final trap approval or issuance of building permits,whi tmver occurs first.A-LeberM Map�W®viaion(LOUR)shall be issued by FEMA prior to octupa.y or improvement acceptance,whichever occurs first. ' t 3.A final drainage study shall b3 submitted to and approved by tta City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits.wha',-ver oatum first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. SC-210! i1of12 � I 4.A permit from the C ;trtty Flood Control District is requ'red for work within ds right-of-way, Completion w,�, S.Trees are prohibited within Z feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a maPjre tree trunk. _._6.Public storm drain easam ks shalt be graded to convey overflows In the event of a ---�-- bke aqe in a sump catch basin on the public street.' P.Utlfitt*S , ide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, —J---I gas,electric pourer,telephone,and cable TV(all underground)in accordance with the Utility 5'tandards.Easements shall be provided as required. fv ', •10 a,vetoper shall be responsible for 1111,-relocatfonof existing utilities as necessary. 3 L.er and sewer plans shall be designed and oonstvcted to meet the requirements of the — Cucamonga County Water District(CCWD),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Semardfno.A)attar of compliance from the CCWD is required ptforto final map approval or Issuance of permits, { whichever Occurs first. t; Q.General Reruttements and Appt�rats 1.V)e separate parcels contained.vithin the project boundaries shall be legally combined rota' —� ,f one parcel prbr to issuance of building permits. 2.An easement for a Joint u Ro driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval ar ,v,/ r Issuance of buAdtng penrdts,whiclteveroocurt:,first,for: r few St.�'_�,iPrlc.. Ty 'L3ciKer rain 3.Prior to _J�l approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with:tho'%ittr covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assossmantss under rrit DIMM among the newly created parcels: 4.Etiwanda/San Sevalne Area Regional Mainline,Secondary Reglznai,arat Master Plan ,_L_.J—. Drainage Fees shall bepMd prior to'iMW map approval orpdortotundiag permit Issuance it no map is Involved- 5.Permits shall be cbfalmd from the fOftMA4 SQW4158.for work within their right-of-way: .r%/, 6.A signed conserd and waiver form to join ar:dfor form the Law Enforcemerd Cot nmuMy;- _._/__J Facilities DW.4 rhal l be filed with the City grgInaer pdor to gnat rpap,approval or the issuance of bulkling permits,whichever occurs first.Formation cosfs shalll,!-n. borne by the Developer 7.Prior to fnatlzOon of any developmelo.Pipe,Sufficient impravemerd plans shall be com- ___/--J_, pleted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainge protection--to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.Phase bcurtdadles shah correspor to lot shown on rho approved tentative map. SC,-2/9I 12of 12 Q RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE, June 26, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City 'tlanner BY. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD -SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-04 THE WATTSON COMPANY'- A request to modify the median break location on Foothill Boulevard, to add a median '` break'locatior_ on Foothill Boulevard, and to change the land u3e designation from Light Industtrial to Regional Related Commercial for an, area of approximately 26 'acres within the Foothill ' Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4)f lorated on the east side of Interstate 15, south of Foothill Boulevard. These requests are in conjunction with the development .of a t60 acre retail/commercial center located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between I-15 and Etiwanda .Avenue APN: 229-031-03 through 13, 16, and 20. Staff recommends `ssuaace 'of a i Negative Declaration. Related Files:. Conditional Use Ermit 90-37 and Tentative Parcel Map 13724. ENVIRONMENTAL.'ASSFSSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-37 THE WATTSON COMPANY A request for master plan approval, of a t60 acre retail/commercial -center containing approxi-alely .550,000 I square feet of leasable space and a request for approval of conceptual site plan,and building elevations for the Price Club facility in ,,e Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial designations of the Faotbill Boulevard Specific Plan (S*fbarea 4), located on the south side, of Foothill go-alevard between , Interstate 15 ano Etiwanda Avenue - AWx 229.-031-03 through 13, 15,, 16, and 20. Staff recommenc:a issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related Files. Foothill Boulevr-.rd Specifl, Plan Amendment 90-04 and Tentative Parcel Map 13724. Associated with the project is Tree Removal Permit 91-24. fI. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTT_ON: A. Action Requested: Approval of a conceptual Master Plan, and a specific Site Plan and Building Elevations Ear the Price_ !{ facility, issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration for ' Conditional Use"Permit 90-37, and recommendation of approval to the:' City Council ;for Environmental Assessment and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-04. 4I ITEMS J & k PT,ANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 - THE WATTSON'`'COMPANY June 26, 1991, Page 2 E. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: , North - Mixed isei Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea'4` Regional Related Commeicial.and Community Commercial) South Water trarsmission facility, industrial plant andrv'` acants Sndustrial Specific Plan (Su)area 8 - General Industrial) East( - Vacant and Single Family Residential? Foothill Haulavard Specific Plan (Subarea 4 - Community Commercial) and Low. Residential (2'-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Interstate 15.and vacant! ` Victoria' Planned Community (Regional ielatefl Commercial) C. General Plan Designations. Project Site - Commercial and,'Industrial Park North Commercial I{ South - General Industrial East - Commercial, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acsa) II West- - Commercial D. Site Charac"teristics: The site contain s'several unique elements I) indicative of the Etiwanda. area and the-,,.Route 66 Corridor during the 1920a through the 1960v'... The site was the h03t of the Cucamonga,Tog Winery and `i)ntains t1le remains of the winery complex, with its grape crusher, cistern,`•,}oading dock, accessory buildings, Craftsman home occupied-by the wl:iery owners (the Guidera6), and a small stc_e used for sefZinng .wine. A second Craftsman-style residence is located to the east of ,the Cucamonga 2:_n Winery complex and was awned by another wine-making fam Xy (the DiCarlgs) of the area. The eastern most structure ,on the site, is an old gas' station which c-nt,3red restaurant space as part of the servico operation. The go,� }station has since been ;converted to a bodyshop.' Also characteri3tic of the Route 56 Corridor, approximately two-thirds of tha street :frontage along'Foothill Boulevard contains a double row of Eucalyptus trees. The balance of the site contains grape vineyards,and is undeveloped. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Re9uired Provided ? Price Club 111,326 1/220 506 821 Wal-Mart 155,584 1/220 '707 1.-808 (ultimate) Gas Station 3 5 Restaurant : 6,000 1/100 60 60 6,000 1%55 109 109 Fast 'Food 10,174 1/75 136 147 Retail 282,894 1/220 1,286 1,291 2807 3,241 s PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90 37 - THE WATTSON'COMPANY Tune 26, 1991 ACk Paye 3 II. ANALYSIS: A. Master Plan: The applicant is`;proposing to develop a i60 acre retail/commercial center consisting of approximately S20,000 square feet of retail space, -22,000 'square feet of restaurant/fast food use, and a `r;ervice station..:£ The center i)%,proposed to be anchored by a Price Club ozd a-Wal-Mart. At this y�limirary stage, the far western portion of the _site is planned,vyfor four aajor tenants ranging in size from 1;7,500 sc{uare feet to -22000 square feet, 20,000 square feet of shop space for smaller 'users, a 6,150':square- foot retail pad, and a 12,000 ,square foot restaurant pad. The fa_: eastern portion of the site contains a 50,p00 square foot` • supermarket'and three major tenants, ranging in size 'from 22000 to 26,000 square feet, and -137,350 square �eet of shoo space. In addition, three retail pads, four `drive-t�ru-pads, and a service. s!_ation are proposed along the Foothill Boulevard street.frontage. The Master Plan depicts basic building, parking, and circulation' aisle locations within ; the'lprojact- Specific design for each' building, or series of ,buildings (except Price Club), will be subject to separate Development 'Review or Conditional Use Permit applications. (as required by the Foothill>' Boulevard Specific Plan).: Based on a recent conversation with ,the applicant, substantial changes may occur to the site plan, especially the western portion, based on the needs of particular tenants. These changes will be reviewed with the future applications, but within the context of this Master Plan. B. Price Club: The applicant has submitted a site plaa: and building elevations for a 111,325 square foot Price Club facility. The building is proposed as a free-standing structure on a 12:2 acre parcel, generally locaf;ed in the central portion of the project. The northeast corner of the building will he devoted to the sale and installation of tires. 'The parking grovided for the Price Club is just under one and one-half times the;Code requirement. Additional parking is based on the Price Clubs experience and needs of existing facilities in order to accommodate the influx of customers' especially at peak-times (Christmas). C. Foiithill Boulevard-Specific Plan Amendment: I. Median break location: With the development of the center, the, applicant will be constructing a signalized intersection m:3way between Etiwanda Avenue and the Interstate 15 Freeway. `'The, location proposed, hff:ever, has been shifted approximately 220 feet to the east i3f' the location °shown within the Foothill. Boulevard Specific,"Plan. This proposed location was selected, ` not,only to provide access to the subject site, but also to line' up with the existing driveway,for the church on the north side; of Foothill Boulevard. Additi oval) , the applicant has y pP prepared a conceptual master,,plan and traffic analysis to evaluate the PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' CUP 90-37 - THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 4 t' rt ';circulation of the future Regional 4elated Co mercial-use on the north side,,of Foothill Boulevard. Based upon review of-"th�1 information, the new location will be able to serve the fute7.e1'` development. Letters have also been sent to the existing property owners notifying them of the proposed: change in location. 1 1,Comments have been received from the schurch expressing their agreement with the new,location. 2. New Median Break: As part of the development of the site, the applicant is proposing a: left-turn-onl}'mEaiian break between the freeway off-ramp ;and the main .signalized intersection for the project. Because of the unulpal configuration and degth of the southwest portion of the sitej, the applicant feels that the left-turn median break,;_Is necessary to provide adequate circulation for.the project. This issue was addressed in'the traffic stud_.prepared for the sire and has met concurrence with the 'City's ^.raffia Engineer. Additionally, favora' ...e comments have been received from Caltrans for the' ars'ditional median break. f 3. Changes in"Zoning Designation: Under the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the southern and southwestern portions of the site were 'designated Light Industrial with the southwest{ )rtion oc the site being considered•for a Regional Related Commercial" use }hrough thu submitt '":;viand approval of a master plan. With the ''submittal of, the master plan for the retail commercial center, the applicant is now requesting that the zoning designation be changed consistent with their proposal. There is, however, a small area 'within the project site 'that was not originally considered as a potential Regional 'Related:Coamercial use. The area in the, approximate location of the 'Wal-Mart building is designated as Light Industrial. With the Big Three Inedstries located to the south and the 'MetrP,politan Water Di6trict facility located immediately to the ea3t, this area wvalld remain an isolated -Light Industrial pocket. .In that the applicant has submitted-a master plan showing.-,a commercial use of the entire area, staff feels it is appropr, ate to'onisider a change in the zoning from Light Industrial to Regional Related Commercial consistent with the balance of the project. D. _Design Review' Committee: This project has been the subject of five Planning Commission workshops. The format of these workshops was set up to review specific aspects of the project. The frst workshop focused on major site planning issues. The second workshop provided direction for the architecture of the center and the Price Club facility. The third workshop rconsidered revisions,to the site plan for the entire site and the architectural concept for the in- line shops for the 'eastern and :western ends of the' projects (excluding the free-standing buildings). The fourth workshof, centered on the conceptual site plan and bt: lding elevations for the Price Club and. finally, the fifth. Planning Commission workshn:- considered the overall master plan for the site. ✓/ 0(�- / � j i PLANNING COMMISSION STiLFFYI REPORT CUP-90-3^�� TH5 WATTSON t^,OMPANY' Sune 26, 1991 Page 5 l+ 0 , 1. Price Club: On May 16, 1991, the PLanning'Commission considered . �) the conceptual site plan and building elevations for the Price' Club facility. I At that -time, the Commission, recommended approval of the plans subject to the elimination of the tile' roof alements over the main entry and providing a flat roof design ;consistent with that shown for the tire' centP.r entry. The plans for the Price Club have since been revised consistent with the Planning Commission's direction. 2. Msster ?lan: .;On June''6, 1991, the Planning Commission reviewed The overall master plan for the project. I The Commission) recommended approval of the, project subject to the following conditions: . a. The. design of Pad 8 was not acceptable in that sufficient stacking distance, was not provided fos: the fast food restaurant;,,. The plan should be revised to provide a design that is1 feasible for development. b. The design of Majors 5-8 and Shop G is note, acceptable. Variation should' be <provided in the building footprints, elevation fenestration, and-building heights with future submittals. c. The Commission noted that provisions, other than the two fast food restaurants, were not made for restaurant users within the eastern portion of the site:' If the applica,�t is proposi.ng.additional restaurant:users, .adjustments wili'7ha7e to be made'iu the square footage of the buildings to ensure adequate'parking'is, provided, as required by,the Development Code. d. Site amenities should be provided across the site to link the 'various elements :of the project. A. hierarchy of site amenities should be provided to physically and visually link elements 'across 'the site. The primary emphasis of this hierarchy^.should'be along the north/south drive aisles. The exact elements and extent of Lthe amenities should be reviewed, by the 'Planning Commission. The hierarchy might Include such elements as building focal ,points,` kiosks, trellises,'seating areas/benches, colored/textured walkways,. signage, street furniture, and landscaping. 35 e. The applicant should submit architectural details and elements to be re,.riewed and: approved by the .Planning CommisEion: to establish art architectural vocabulary to be s used• as the basis for design of future buildings within the center. D/ -�' PLANNING COMMISSION"STAFF REPORT \, CUP 90-37 THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 6 f. ..The compact parking_spaces provided by the applicant were acceptable for the following reasons: 1) The compact parking within the Wal-Mart area was in addition to those spaces required under the Development Code. ;Stag',-- spaces have been provided to meet the Code requirement for parking stalls. 2) Compact'spaces provided for the eastern portion of the site exceed current Code standardsa they are the same. width as standard stalls (9 feet)°ard are 1 foot longer ` than compact stalls (17 feet,•versus 16 feet). Under the Development Code, a. 1 foot overhang"# permitted for standard stalls and(lhe proposal woui:�only result in a 1 foot reduction of `a standard stall. If, however,, the applicant;proposes to alter or modify the design of the parking;area in the eastern portion of the' situ the standardu in place at the time of the proposed revision must be complied with. ! g. . Pads along the I-15 Corridor should be designed to be sensitive to the visibility from the freeway, 'Buildings should not be oriented with their backs to the freeway and sufficient, architecturally designed, roof-mounted screening should be provided. E. Historic Preservation Commission: Ks noted ender the Site Characteristics section of the staff report, the project location, contains, the remains of a family owned and operated_winery':and a filling station characteristic of thCl1420s through the 1960s. The complex represents a`'hi,toric period, style, and way of life which is becoming more and more rare in the City. Because of its historic significance, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the site for possible Local Landmark Designation. In considering the site,the Historic Preservation Commission felt .that a Local Landmark Designation 'would not be appropriate. This decision was based on the fact that the'`site has been significantly altered and destroyed to a point where recommending Landmark Designation over 'owner' objection was not merited. The Historic Preservation Commission did, however, feel that tI:e history of the area should be in some =way -.o'.mnemorated. As a result, the Historic Preservation Commission recoumWnded approval of the'site as a point of interest. to the City Council subject to a series:,-:�f mitigation measures. The City Council subsequently approved the Resolution with the following mitigations:. 1. The project owner shall sponsor a City approved Oral History 1<rogram of the pioneering/wine-making families of the subject, area. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Aim Page 7 '. The existing structures shall be documented fully according to &ABS/HAER standards by an architect approved by the City. 3. Project owners shall offer to donate the Guidera and DiCarlo homes over a period of 180 days to persons demonstrating ownership of land within the City of Rancho Cucamon3a suitable for such relocation. The project oFmers will{-pay for such 4. The applicant shall incorporate the familial and architectural past of the area into commissioned public art integral to the architectural design of the project. This art;shall portray southern Etiwanda's wine-making past in a realisz` c style and the applicant will submit no less than three alternatives, in no less than three different artistic 'mediums, for the Historic Preservation Commission's review. The final specifications for this architecturally integrated artwork 'shall be approved by the Planning Commission. S. The appUcant•shall use personal names and those o� associative qualities, such as winery names or wine labels, on the project site wherever possible. ''` 6. No demolition permits shall be issued for existing structures within the project site until the issuance of building permits for any new structure. 7. The applicant shall contribute up to $100,000 to establish a fund for the reconstruction of`a 2,000 square foot barn at the site of the City owned Chaffey-Garcia house,'wherein local ovine industry artifacts will be documented and displayed. Said funds shall be donated prior to the issuance of der,., Uticn permits. The design of said structure shall follow the design of the original Chaffey-Garcia barn and its execution shall be subject to review and approval of the Historic Preservation Com=ssiony in the form of,a Landmark Alteration Permit. F. Environmental Assessment: In completing the Initial,Study, staff -' has identified that there are* several potential environmental impacts as a resin. of the project. These items include; 1. Traffic: Because' of the unusual configuration of the site and the type of users being considered, including two 100,000+ square foot` users, a traffic study was prepared to address �r potential impacts from the site on>surrounding properties. This report addressed the trip generation from the site at the various driveway access pointsto public streets. In addition, the report addressed the impacts of the project at intersections and ' provided designs for the ultimate design of the intersections. As a result, the applicant will be providing t'ie following mitigations: . � K- 7 P:IANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CAP 90-37 - THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1997 Page 8 a. Foothill Boulevard will be improved with three through lanes on the south side.of the street, a fully`developed median, } and two through lanes on the north side of the street. b. Dual left-turn lanes will be provided at the main entry to the project to acco aaodate turning movements into the site and to provide for turning movements into �,he future project on the north side of Foothill Boulevard. c. Dual lest-turr�ianes will be provided for eastbound traffic on Foothill Boulevard turning north onto Etiwanda'Avenue. d. Dual left-turn laries will be provided for traffic heading north on Etiwanda Avenue and turning westbound on Foothill Boulevard. e. Right-turn lanes will be provided for each driveway along Foothill Boulevard and the northerly driveway on Etiwanda Avenue. f. A left-turn-only median break will be provided at the western-most driveway along Foothill Boulevard in order to access.the far southwest corner of the project. 2. Tree Preservation: This site contains many mature trees located in basically three areas. A number of mature trees are located around the existing single-family resid:nces ,-and winery complex. Also, a cluster of trees is located in tha southwest` portion of the site around what was once the Big Bear Winery. Finally, a double row of Eucalyptus trees occupies:approximately two-thirds of the Foothill Boulevard frontage. Many of 'these trees are classified as heritage trees and as ,suzhF are subject to the Tree. Preservation Ordinance. . A Condition of Approval has been included requirir_g the approval of Prae Removar Permit prior to the issuance of grading permitn 1 ,� arborist's report'_ - shall be prepared in conjunction with trie Tree 'Removal Permit to address the possibility of preservation and/or relocation of existing trees on site, 3. Cultural Resource: As noted in the Historic Preservation Com mission ion portioh of the staff report, there are, a number of cultural resources on..the site. , The Historic ;Preservation Commission took these :.;ssues into consideration in establishing the mitigation measures contained, in their Res, '?on 91-01 (See Exhibit "F"). These mitigat+lon measures have t.. n included in the Resolution of Approval for the master plan. Therefore, although the project could have a significant effect in these areas, staff found that there will not be a significant effect in this case because, of the mitigation measures which have been Incorporated into the project design or included as Conditions of Appi.:Yal. Staff recommends sst�ince of a mitigated NegaY.�#a, 'Declaration. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 9 III- FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Conditional Use Permit application is ,sistent with the General Plan; the Development Code, anti the Foothill l toalevard Specific Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. - The proposed uses and site plan, together with the Conditions of Approval,_ are in compliance with the applAcable provisions of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan,:: Development Code, find Ci,y standards. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan\.,Amendme,it will,provide for the development of -a comprehensively P Y planned urban community that. is I superior , to the development otherwise allowable under alternative regulations. The amendment will provide for development of the Specific Plan in A manner which is consistent with the General: Plan,and with.the related development a-3 gro:,rth management policies,.of the City. ""The amendment will prov°" 'for the construction, improvement, and extension of transportation.;'.=acilities, public utilities, and public services required wita 4u in t Sp ecific ecific Pl an.p an Additionally, the,. y, amendment wi ll 1 not be detrimental to the public health or safety or- cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: These have been advertised as public"clearings in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, notices were.se4 tp,`all property owners within the subarea of the Specific Plan, and the site was posted. A V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 90-37, issue a mitigated Negative Declaration for the Conditional Use Permit, and recommend approval of Ervironmental Assessment an Fo othill oothih Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-04 to,the City Council,. Respec ly submitted, i f Brad ler City lanner i BB:SM:sp Attiac`s.•=nts: Exhibit"A" - Site Utilization Plan Exhibit "B" - Conceptual'Site Plan =xhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exi.ibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan 'Exhiblt "E" - Building Elevations Exhib,c r`tl.,- City,%ouncil Resolution No. 91-059 Resolution recommending approval.of Foothill Boulevard . Specific Plan Amendment 90-04 Resolution of Approval for ConditionalUse Permit'90-37 IWO P� i - m4N6'MLt� d d -- _ -, v 0 o :D U -- _ ----- ! {r G. R If f {fI .33 71 ol zz 22 - f - - — u u 0 ry fi f _ 4 4 { ym ar� } ja t 7 F ��� J � �`� I f _ ■ ti UW__ LI11t)tllll111o' i _ -� Alk TU - i YUOR A I OF ucoc rnn.E . PU NMI4 ION -� - EXHIBrr.6-2 SCALE: ^ ,�- j' NY: cry 4o z3� CITY OF UCAMONGA PLAN ION TTt'LE: i ,,a, - � F i E - - I • y OF UCAMONGA rrEmrs. PLAN "ION _ TTME• ` ` - y �- ExHmIT:e-$ scALE --� - --- -- - ._ 7` ---�•�/"' \ lea ;f 11 4-3 _ I __ss A. u \t' r wr io j ff / -Z Yt - v� a ji 79 4✓'r? 9 St Tmij _ _-9-r W..-•ram ;�E: J` .r Adlkl .-"'7R 3 t�. ^�7s+wnei'e�o d _ n.r$ es 3 �Mgr�r.n�c,Pei c s a; x S i s u x s�f. !� x3tFx _ff 'r}t ff. 3!{ '+� i.r F:_.f... '_t .� ii3rt...E.f1f ft tc 2 .Sa,E.� `xS,t}3 }t7r +.. yS� Y <= w ; E !tt ,x i + j x extf-! ag t s tyti; f ai ii I z s a F far tt3F S 31 f!'f t } ! f W.v"_ }J1xll 1\ ra COO Val 121 'tip \1 ';� �.>,..., x• �' ", ' . r U F 6� Ix YCri' F --� ' I � IZ -� ^ F I �� 3a OF UCt�i/i®NGL� I°I'Em: PT mTfn IDIV 1Tt. t :.,;, eiry��,''=�— �� _..:. ��—y�y dr ,k� •—� Y •_' �� }}a _T �� � �Y'�ii���� �t fv�� k ! .rt. �}�• ii dp ! :,ti ;!: ��,. a�� y, ����a.�,._.�.�d�. ' tea '`. ..GCE. ,. �: ��, ;,`� ': .� i �_= '' n ��,. �. �.;t :�a �: �= .�. �. ,� `_ .. ,�.. .. �. .�� ;. . ,� .' f i L' ,� C h,. ...: E;c` a ��� -^�- �1111111111.1111 w n - s r ri. � • F -- ,z z Y � Y"•~ :� t I4a"r c' d•� �I AM r o r J G }{#{tJ foe Rr..rmm •t 11 r. fi_ 1p t Jmf•00 RR.N/.ep CITY OF UCAMON � MN TON N _2� - ,ter_ :_k :. AML f a !c vp J Z. Cal ti r35FPA�; Of ° fi. Tr E .ram � °.� � � • — �� Yam!' �„ �°•- '.�%�.y` .�� �j _���o _ —o— - -- • � --?� lira' }' s Is it a � •' ty.. ` .. a s-_. -a. UEM: 400 OF UOAMONGA \ii' PLAN MN ION Trr E ffo21AA1 ad2� 9y . ;, EXH rr.. D -2 SCALE: � n . T ' oarn 14'7'K/M1�Sp�i 4 Ire if -.4i .� --w �Li:yam^. '. t,P• .. - �. "'!'-`^� c i6,.•—��- __ .,+,yap .� a:,'" .6t KiW k •[fi c t "ate .! �,�. ii�W e "♦. 3 _._T- UL d R \ • �£*�� ——-��——�—,L 7----•—s3a �� �,si-—.4' of� �p `.`f�} u a r• r _ _ _ ie � F. � •fir' — — 4 � o Ill�dS MY OF � UCAIONGA MEW Cuo � 3a PLAN Tii T LION TITLE: AA1MG �.v N .s EW18IT:13-3 SCALE: "�_ 'fir S1'f'�u 1— �}_t—. �:'J—�+ .a..,�,� rT�.'G_'1'�'•a 1" IL -44 it �a s:"�.�_ .'ae\�t�-, :" gg8i;�'d��'� • `f ;^� uj 6 ,! "9� r•J!, _ iti •aN$�� 'S�� �:: � `gip ` r'�� 1. 6S 1 i� I r.. t �• ' 'i,y;'�€" �- � sS "'—��.a' it -u,1• cg �� i � , Rig, ' n of — >: �. `E 7<`' -..-fa.•�•- �'� � �"`",..� 4•�. .I�c Lt e jr".14+^.47Cr.tsV.:},,'.i. {,/ 'N c_c(s'rc.{se�.f�.t.c:..i. 1.. •-.i`-` L A (T. It t '`�4 :� �1 a F '.e.�_ i r rar..•` 4r;!�'i r' �tv` `.J1s �y r,..3S rL fix-2 ;ter u ' a c � u At (' t., t" r--- - ---ice '"` •. ;'ia�--��' �' � - 2.6 RESOUMON NO. 91-J54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CL''t'Y OF RANCHO C[SCA 4MM, CALT.,m,RNIA, APPROVING HI5?=C PODM OF nasnsr 91-01, TwuBy DE:sjm,41TING jam awANEC-A, GUI'DERA, AND DICAMO VINEYARD, LAND^a AND snmcimus LOCATED AT 125--j, 12601, 12617, 12615, 12705, 12743, 12777, 12801, 12807, 12811, 12821, and 12881 FOOTfII1Z i BOULEVARD AS AN HISTORIC POINT OF INTEP.E r-' tWHEREAS, on Dect,4ber 6, 1990 and Tanuary 3, 1991, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho o cambrxla conducted3 duly noticed public hearings on the application. W10REhS, the City Qxnr oil ,has ieoek.� and reviewed all input regarding said Point of Interest designation. WHEREAS, all legal p r requ�sites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Now, THEREFORE, the City Camcjl of the City of Ra o Cucaronga'dues hereby find, determine`and rese",a zs fi)llaws: SECTION i• T'w application 4P34es W-;arprcximately 62 aczes of lam, basically a rectanrjular configuration, loci%. d along the south side of Foothill Boulevard east of Interstate T:3 and west of E Iwarx a Avenue, APN: 229-031-03 through 13. -2: MW proposed Point of Interest meets the followiin �teri3 established in Chapter.2,24.090 of td-e',` u'M3niCip31 A. Historiwa and Cultsnral Signifies: Finding is The proposed Point oZ Interest is j=U=11arly represen- tative of a historic period, type, style, reg,Ear., or way of. life. Fact: ThO DiCarlo, Schir4, Elmgwme7lla, Enema, Columbaro, and Guidera families forged a' aaity based an shared cultural back- ground, faith, and way of wdstm=. These wean, men, and c hildren pioneered the growing of grapes and the making and selling of wine in t"a eastern0XW=n9atSQfthern Ltiwa,Ua region in the 3320's and 1930's. Zhe hen-ar i winery buildings stand as renters of the thriving family�bcsed one so prevalm& in thi.3 area. The Orchard/Meier filling station is linked-bisstar rally with the small retail 'wineries and homes it lies r to through the most Pear thas0139hfare of the time, Route'66. The Vise' of alfto obile travel, gave way to the parallel C ri elctze t of roadside diners, gas stations, and repair,.sloops. At arse time, this sttvctura filled all of these 'jv3eds for travelers as well as theses of the grow;:'g c sasmity of Etiwan da. 'Oor Resolution No. 91-059 Page 2; ? Find' 2: The s irw Pr Point of Inter-rst is an example of a type of huildirg which was once caimon but is now rare. Fact: The tL o hams remain as testame ks, to the -rlftsman style as it' was interpreter) in the area during the 1920s.' S-wn examples are increasingly rare. Fstimated construction of tn:a �.' llin station date to the late 1910s. Fin ftinr- 3: The rrZoposed Point of -Tnterest iw connected with.a b-minie_ss ar use which was once camm but is'no--rare. Fact: Wineries, large and modest, cmmased a thrtvim majority ,f the Cucamonga/Etiwaanda a �ls ]businesses and land .uses in the era from 1915 1950. These once eats ire agricultural enterpriser. are rapidly disappearing from the landscape... Fln ther,=e, twdside filling statiorsirants are now all but obsglete` B. Neighborhood and Genrrant'ta Setting;.y FingiM 1: The pr ed'-Point of Miterest maten-ially bone 'its tb-- historic character of the rK- ghbLrhood. Fact: These bei'udings form a large Fart of tha,overall sense or place and past in the arc:.. Findi _a: The proposed Pointe of Interest in its locations represents an a:ablished and familiar visual feature of the neiglnbctiaod, cm6i nity, or city. Fact: Owned by pioneer fame whos3 desdaWthts have stayed in the ocenammity, "the home, winery, and fill.im station have lsng been an established and viable element in t!m area. Fa,?;i.n 3: Tne properties are on the city�s historical nva tory. Fact:' The properties am list(Ad thus. Find•_rn a: The properties stand oast as having,' outs" hi.strrieal 'a hItectlUral cultural or aesthetic-Significance. Tni fiCaSK7e. 4 The area's distupticn as caused by the wider iM of Rx thi ll Boa�avvard, the =nstn=.icn of Irtarstate 35, and the inareasinng obsolescence of _agricultural 'uses in the Mian has xed ce3 Significantly the context of tium -iasca •„V, prqxsed prc;9ct calls '3ut for the s litiou of all of the ramming bui.ldir°,gs and the developer Wised initial ejection to any, retention or landmarking of the structmms, tvs matter of overriding i1coaficance must be dam. Thus, this gbific of t ntarest . Resulut on with mitigation remmmendations ;fie tY; great historical value of the area as a unit and not spwific str-actures. Auk U Resolution ,3o. 9.L 059 age 3 FC J i Finding Designation could help protect it. -act/ P:eyartilers of the review prooess._.oalled into plays by &jection, the proposed Fciothill,Marketplace would izapact greatly an 1r his;.oric site with stxancj cultural and ethnic significance. Thus,, J; P e the project would have sz. negative envirommntal effZM These. r.ffects can be aueliorated by forward V ._''ram -the-' planning Gxtsniasiot. "s tuitigaticz re ndati.ons Section 3 of this Resolution. > S'rJCR QN 3: This oes*uwetion far Hi.- oric Paint of Interest has been reviewed and in '`=pliar with the California Bhvfronnental Qua?ity �,ct of 19 a 0 tired was:been determined t D be categoricallj,, exempt and arc further, the Coy a:il hetaI4 r n.'ds tYiat'the"followiir3 r tigaticM reammnen dations La h el d wi; the Flanrli r g Cmjission's etsvix,unnenta1 revip•°,and deter-nimtions fer the overall Foothill Marketplace prnject 1) The pmc+a�.^fi ow'�ss shall sponsor .a City-adminis+:Fsrea Oral History t-ogram LL of the piers trine-VsJk f'ami'.ies of the Jmbjecl- area. 2) Tke exi *Cirjg stractuMs shall be dodunented fully a=rdlir to IPS /i ENER Sta�s k► any arq.hitect appxxNed by tie Clity.: f. 3) Z4 pro e:t owners shall i demte the fay :era andDiCarlo homes -% aid pay or their reIo=tici tb I Z gC.M at-^.g cwnershir of a patroe .a' 1 �f san3 within th? 1 a �f Rz r cho "Cuomo a and suitable €o .�2x a,relocation. 7h�:sA heroes shall be available for ,mich� donation eve a peria3 of 130 days. Such parcels j hated in the his=oric'CcTamity of £tiwanca will,'be:.given fixst,preferanoa. r ' 4) 7�' project owners shall utilize person. l ry�st, and those of C as.�ociatim qualities, such as winery names tic wi l&.�, on the project site whenever-:wssiblP. a) 7[2xr deve]..< 'W u* =arparate tre '`'•.::lial arift.. agric.�il�,:.al Past Of tip: area into cc:�ssim-ad r1ie`tc-arty,Lntegral to atchiteab*+�i design of:the gmnject. this art ,=k shall,por'�May southern E'titzvdsls wine-maicing past in a 'milistic 1 style and . the project ownw."will strl;Zdt rn than tti.ree- alt-wriktives in no. less than th--�Re different art-Istic moans f�z 3--ke Ht:sitoric Pr ''SFatiCt➢ cmmission's revie specif}satior for this ysrcxhitec4ural}ri.-st at.p-; aE twce than be apprmed.by the f' Placming C�.issien. 6) No demolition tom,rtit3 ;shall Sae -_ ``dim sees within Y b j: $1 m untill the'�. .permits -lures for znl' new st.:=- AMh i Resolution No 91-n59 page,A 1 J 7f The project owner shi11 contribute up to $10-0 000.6. to establish a�,fund for the reoanstruction�?f a 2,000 square foot barn at the site of Vie Citykwied Chaffey/Garcia house-whereinr local waw' --Peg' _'Y artifacts 'will be,:ocm-mentsd:and-displayed. TkE s sds,. ,Js 'sha11 be donatF,d prig to the issuance os - demolition permits.' The ;aesigf `cam the.:,ci==stru acre small foil cO the desiL�n of the r�final �EfeV/Gansu lxa�rl alid its execution sh" be subject' to t2he review and approval of the' Histoi:C Prese+vation C ma fission in t.'.e form" of a Lwx'mark, AY:eration Permit, A ; LF=09 44 Based upon t',ie findings aril conclusions set f'ortyi `<in Sections 1, 2 and 3;above, and received and reviewed by this`Council, BE rr FUt7Tf3 M R: OLD `Coati the City Cciri i of the City of Rancho Cucamonga appr.3ves the forwardirxj of�tr-';LR mitiqation, reamnexidations to the Play%nin.7 Cmimis ion and the desigr'&i i of­the dEimp^r.a21a, u'Adera;. aiid DiCatlo vineyard'lands.and strdctvxges as an Historic Poir,,C o€,,Zr:caa a. FASSED, JAM*WM, and ADOPTS U s 20t4 day �f JMzxr,17, 1991. AYES: Alex�, F sTnt, Stout, Williams, Wright MES: None P.BS3Z.7: None Dennis L'. S^toud� Mayor A city clzvc T, MEEPA J. ADS, CF3'Y CLEM of the city ofvwnhocamonga� CaliFon a, do her-.by certify ttlAt the foregoing Resolution Baas ctaly passed . ,t approved, and ad 3 by..the City C M=il^of ttz City of Rmwllo', aV rx3a: Califorma, at a r a .-, c regular meeting o1. sail City C7otajcil.�kyeld a�ttie 2Oth c�,a_ of . ; February, 1991. L j Resolution No" 51 0= / Page 5 FScecstecl this 21,A day of Fciany3 r, 1991 at Rancho GUcarrorr Caiifo,rua. De1a -,. C:ty Clerk (� r a w ,..i IF Iry �4 _ t Y% �Y\ f t, �i 11u` a J� ,I. .J! ��'-3 0 crtj• 5 15: r ! tl RESOLUTION NO. 1 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMIuSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD;SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-04, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN TO MODIFY THE MEDIAN BREAK LOCATION ON., FOOTHILLL._,, BOULEVARD, TO APD A MEDIAN BREAK LOCATION ON FOOTHILL— j BOULEVARD, AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM ! LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO BE("IONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL FOR AN it AREA OF APPROXIMFaTELY 26: ACRES" WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVA SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 4) LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, IN � CONJUNCTION , WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 160 ACRE = RETAIL/COMMERCIAL CENTER LOCATED ON THE SOUTH' SIDE<OF; FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN INTERSTATE 25, AND ETIWANAA tl AVENUE, AND 'MAKING FINDINGS-,IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-03x-03 THROUGH 13, 15, 16,, AND-20. A. Recitals. (i) The Wattson Company has initiated an application for Foothill i "Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 90-04 as descried in ths,title of thiP.' I Resol t<?on. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is,referred to as "the application." f�l (ii) on. Jun e 26, 91, .the Plannins Csnmi4aien of the city. of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a d4 °y noticed publ v,lheariAg on the'application and concluded said hearing on'; ;hat date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior tc the adoption of this-Resolution have occurred. B. Aesoluti,)n. N•!,)W, THEREFORE,, it is hereby found, det;armired, and resolved' by the Planning Commission of thel�City of,Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of'.the facts set fort;., in the Recitals, part A, of this ,t-'solution are true and;roriect. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referanoed public hearirg on June 26, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together With public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The amendment pertains to a t60` acre parcel of land located on the eouth side of Foothill Boulvard Between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of.t2,175 feet along-Foothill Boulevard and t690 feet along Etiwanda, Avenue The site is pre6Antly designated for Regional`Related Commercial and L ight"Industrial uses and is developed with six?gle-family residences, a winery"complex, and a'converted.gas stztion; and PLANNINGCCMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _ w ?SPA 90-04 - CITY OP.RANCHO'CUCAMONGA June 26 1991 Page 2 == , (b) The property to the ncirth is designated for Commercial user: and is ,improved with a mia of uses including a church, single-family residences, retail stores, and a converted winery;, The property to the south is designated 'nor Industrial uses and is developOd with an' industrial business, is being developed with a-water tre4ment facility, and id'vacant. ., The pryper4y to the erst iB.desianated for Comms:rcial and Residential uses"oral is vacant and:;aeveloped with single-family r::ai.dences. The property to the: 'i. west, opposite the.. Interstato 15 Freeway, ,iu designated,!for Commercial us.3s and is vacs,c; and (a) -has amendment wil.f Provide median locations' necessary .to provide adequate circa`\ation to"serve the site while maintaining adequate circulation for the yet";underdeveloped pascels.on the Berth side of' Foothill Boulevard; and (d) This 'amenttm,�nt will provide ,`for a-master planned cogimercia , development as 'was provided Nlor with the adoption of the original Foothill Boole and Spc%i-`ic Plrri; and (a) This amendment ,will Change the xonirq. designation of an. Sndustrill parcel not originally considered- part`of a future, master planned, commercial development. This parcel woL.ld, however, 'become a landlocked property due to the existini development and. developments Widen construction to the south and east.` The inclusion cf this .,parcel in the moister plan is in keeping with the intent of the Foothill' Boulevard Spoaifiii Plan- and the General Plan to provide a compreheneively plarined'area. 3. eased upon the subctant al evidony-.e presented' to this Cama.ission during the above-referenaed 'nubliG hearing and upon the specific findings of facts not forth in paragrapho 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds rod concludes as follows: (a , That the amendment wUl provide for devald?'ment of a comprehensively pla_zngd urban community within the district that is superior to the develog--nent otherwise allowable under alternate regulations? and (b) That the amendment will: provide foc development within the district in manner consistent with '.the Gaea al' Plan and with reYatad development and growth management policies of the City; and (cl !' That the .amendment will provide for the construction,:: nprorpoBnt, or extension of.transportation fi�cilit.ies,..public utilitiesr and public services,required by development within the district. it 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project halm been reviewed and considered in compliance-with the California Environmental ,Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby :recommends issuance ' cf ja 'Negative Declaration: , `321- ; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIGN NO. j f' FSPA 90-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA2iONGA to June 26, J , t } ' Page 3 f n S. Based upon tha,findings and conclusk6ns set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,: 3,, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows (a) :The „Planning Commission hereby recommends that the`City x Council approve and adopt Foothill Boulevard Specific plan Amendment No. 90-04, as attached in Exhibit "A (b) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and rested material., �~ hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to i;W City Council. ' 3. The. Secretary to this Cozmnisrion shall'-certify to the adoption of this Resolt._ron. �`i mil• {i APPRWED AND ADOPTED 'THIS 26TH DAY OF>JUNE' 1991." (1 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF Y;ANCHO CUC;&6GA� Larry T. McNiel, ;Chairman C� a FITTEST: 1 Brad Buller, Secretary j :, I, Brad Buller, ,Secretary of the P.leaning Commission of the 'Ci ,';of Ranolo Cucamonga, do- he`rebf� certify that the foregoin; Resolution- was duly and regularly introduced, pasa`ed, and LLIopted by that Planning Commission of the Cit;, of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held_ on the 26th day'of June 1992, by the following vote=,to-wc: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COXHISS104ER:S: iI ASSENT: COMMISSICNERS: 1 1 r; Ash t' / � V 0 = n 7 ® 4 43 d L7 A,AftLu x 3 d AL uj cc F � ••Ay epuag133 W B CC J 3- Ya W 2 ' C_ A 1-4 tu o u rfc ax,e x a.... U+ 1 "RESOLUTION 'NO. A, RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING.COMMI..SION OF THE CITY OF ` R4NCH0 =jAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 50-37, A REQUEST FOR MASTER ELAN APPROVAL FOR A l t60 ACRE RETAIL/CO.NZIERCIAL CENTER CONTAINING APPROXIMATELX' 550,000 SQL.RE FEET OF LEASABLE SPACE AND A REQUEST FO{.APPROVAL OF CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND BUILDING it Bi-7 TIONS FOR:IHE PRICE CLUB FACILITY IN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION Or TEV FOOTHILL BOULEVARD j ,l SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 4){ LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF „ FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN, INTERSTATE -15 AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND ZW ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT; THEREOF APN: 229-031-03 THROUGH 13, 15, 16,'AND 20. , fl A. Recitals. v (i) The Wattson-CompAny has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit 90-37 as described in.the title of tihis Resolution. Hereinafter in this Aeselution the subject Conditioral Use??ermit is referred to as "the application. ii) _ On the_26th day of June 1991, the Planning Commission of ttis City of Ranc ho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing an the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior;ta the adoption of this Resolution have occ+]rred. �Nc B. Resolution. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby. faund,, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission heereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A; of this Resolution are.true and correct. 2. Faced upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-reforencad public hearing on June 26, 1991 including written and oral ..staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to'a t60 -acre parcel of land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Interstate 15 and Eti.wanda Avenue, 'with..a street frontage of t2,115 feet` a1onq Foothill Boulevard and t600 feet alo-I Etiwanda Avenue,. The sites is presently designi)ted for Regional Rala£ed Commercial and Light Yndustri,�l uses and is devslo ?d with single-family residences, a winery complex, and a converted gas station; and r 1S PLANNING MMMZSSION RESOLUTION NO, CUP 90-37 OnTBILL MARKET PLACzS- June 26, 1991% Page 2, ti (b) ;Vie property to the north is designated fc,�Cemmercial uses and is improved 4 th a mix of uses including a church, ''single'family're€+idences, retail stores, and a converted winery. The Froperty.to_--the south is designated for Industrial uses and in developed with an industrial.business, is being developed YAth a waer{transmission facility, ,and is vacant. The property to the east is designated for 'Commercial and Residential us63 a.nd is vacant and developed rith single-family residences. The property to the went,' Apposite the Interst:.e 15 Freeway, is designated for Commercial uses and is vacant; and (c) The project will comply witf_ all m::nimum standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and (d)' In conju ^,,tian wit2,this:,applicationy the applicant has submitted a request to amend the land usa designation within th%,,, Foothill Boulevard Specific, Plan from Light Industrial to Regional Rj1lated Commercial. ' Provisions were previously incorporated 3n p the Fodthill '`-�ulevard Specific Plan to allow for such a change through revi�#w and approvel a:F a Master Plant and (e) The development of a t550,000 -square foot retail;'commercial" : center is.conaistE-f, with the Regional Related 'Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Commercial de=ignation of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented » this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon,tha srncific findings of facts not forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Gomtiias4 .n hereby finds a,3 concludes as fellows; (a) That the proposed use is in accord with'-tha Cenral Plan, the ob!,ctives of the Development COIL, and the purposes cf�,the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed cse, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to t'>ipublic'health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or morovements in the vicinity.-. (c) That the propos,,%d use complies with each of ins applicable provisions of the Development'Cods and Foothill Boulevard specific Plan. 4. This. Commission hereby girds and certifies that the project has basn reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Ezvironmentxl Quality Act of 1970' and, further, this"Commisaion hereby issues a;_,itigated Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findingC and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, X'; 3, and 4 above, this Comm'ssion hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition-- set tenth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated;herein by this reference. .5� -37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO CUP 90-37 - :OOTHILL MARKET PLACE li Jame 26 1992 -' Page 3 Planninq Division 1) Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is for the conueptual master plan for the entire shopping center and tha detailed site plan and elevations`'for Price Club, All other buildings-,and/or'pads will require the approval of a separate Development Revfgw or Conditional. Use Permit application,' ;s required:_by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 2) APpronal of Conditional bee Permit 90-37 is contingent upon approval of Foothill' Boulevard Specific 'Plan Amendment 90-04 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 13724., 3) Prior to the issuance of,.any grading or building permits, a Tree Removal Permit application shall be reviewed and -approved by the City Planner. An arborist's report shall be prepared to address the possible preservation and/or relocation of heritage trees on-site. The arborist shall be selected by the city and paid for by the developer, 4) No occupancy shall be permitted for any user until all -street improvements,have been installed t� the satisfaction Of the city: 5) If phasing is 'pra.godd, the phasing plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the r center: 6) No permanent outdoor storage of shopping carts shall be permitted, unless otherwise approved by the Planning`Commission. 7) Parking lots along Foothill and Etiwanda shall' be f fully screened from the street through the use of t3 f.uct berms, low :screen walls,- and/or shrub planting. The final details shall be reviewed. and approved by the.':iity-PlArner prior to the issuance .of any building rermits`'for the center: 9) A Jnifnsc Sign' Program shall be prepared for the cer.ti�r and shall be 'reviewed and approved by the Planning Qormaission prior to �tiie issuance of any 4 huilding permits for the'csnter, The program shall consistt of all on-site signage including, but not l limited to, monument signs, direct ,lal signs, and wall signs. K 3e c PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 140. �\ CUP 90-,17 FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE Juke 2' 1991 Page 4 9) All future pads shalll'Ae seeded and irrigated for erosion control prior to occupancy of any building. ; Details .shall be inc?:ded with the landscape and irrigation plane. Tiie plans shall be :-ubmi-4,ted for review and approval by the City Planner prioz�to the issuance of any building permits for the centsri 10) All street furniture, including benches, bike racks;-. pottQ,''pjants, light bollards end standards, drinking fount-_ ns, trash receptacles, etc., shall be reviewed and approved by the PlanvIng'Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 11) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. "s 12) The entire site shall be kept Eree:, from trash and debris at all times and, in =-4 event, shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. - , 13) There shall be vrov.ision for security patrol of the shopping center at least three timer-,per evening, ,t seven days per week, between the hours 'of 10:00 p.m. and 6;00 a.m. by a licensed private patrol 14) Bus shelters on Etiwand&:,Avenue and on, Foothill Boulevard shall be installed with street improvements and shall be architectuf'Ally, compatible to the censer. Final location 'and design 62 the i;un shell:et:s shall be submitted for City Planner revi34i and approval prior to issuance of any, building permits for the center. 15) Any transform-ere, service areas, ortrazh enclosures located near"'the setbacks of Etiwanda Avenue and l Foothill-3onlevard shut only, he corlidexed when they ` are screened by using a combinati,..;cf walls, berms; f and landscaping. r 16) The freeway right-of-way adjacent to the project shrl) be land®caped,, or ahi in-lieu fee paid, in accordance with. Planning Commission Resolution, No. 87-185. The landscape plans shall be-approvttd w the. City Planner or the in-lieu fea shall be �"id trior to tie ;issuance of any building permits i for :-the center. 17) Specimen ties tees (36-inch box or larser) shall be provided,,a4 key i.�tione including, but not lidired to, entries, plazas, on-site intersections, etc, The � i1 r ;2X iINZKG COXHIS-QYQN RESOLUTION NO,.. CUP 90-37 - EOw..tLL MA jMT I_:jCE i .iune 26, 199. Page 5 - type and location of the tree. shall be shown on the final landscape plans which shall be reviewed and : approved by the City planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center, - 18) Any outdoor vending machines shall be arcnitorturall- Integrated into the •design of the ,build�rys, The vendir.-2 machines sh*ll 'not extend out into ?%he pedestrian walkways. 'A recycling permit application shall be submitted for any recycling center" and shall be__r"iawed-,anal approved by the City'Planner ;prior to the issuance of any,building permits for the;:enter, 19) Trach enclosures shall be designed to incorpore.e the following design features to trhe satisfaction of the City Planner: a.. Architrcturall integrated g rated into the design of the, shapptng'center. b. Separate pedestrian access, including a self closing door,'that does not require" opening of _ the mal#x doors. . c. Roll-up doors, I d. Trash bins with counter-weighted'liJ. e. Architecturully integrated overhead trellin� f. Chain s'.k screen on top of_ tho`.J .Closure to proven fi';I.trish from blowing out of the enclosure. The :chain lank shall be hidden from view: 20) The appl5.ca.,;¢ aihall make a good-faith effo:»t to obtain p►-rn.x ;an to grade onto adjacent properties in order tc. eliminate the need tor retaining wills Along the south,property line. Such'evidence al.411 be preser �,& to 'tile City Plaxsner prior Q the isscance ol , adin gr• q permits. 21) If permission to grade off-pits ,cannot be chitained, landscape Flans for Metropolitan Water District:U11all be "raviewed to determine, `the lr„acticaelity of installing wrought Iron stencing on top 'of "' s rstai"$ng :wall in order to minit,,i.ae the impact of xbi ad id wall. The plans shall be reviewed and - approved by the City Pla::tier prior to the Assvance of �4 grading per'mi*,s. -\_, Q7 1 02 OUNE 26 99� P,C, AGE MA 10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUR' 30-37 -,FOOTHILL MARKET:,PLACE 1 June 26, 1991 „ Page ,. ' 22) Prior to thug issuance,o£ any permits .or acceptance of any future)application, the app licaut,shall submit architectural you calars, And details to further, define the architectiisal vocabulary expected for the center. The'iAformation'(including the final colors and verification of all roof-mounted equipment for Price 'Club) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. 23) A plan', of development for on-site amenities shall be established to "tie" the site' together through pedestrian-scale ' linkages. Elements to consider include, but,are not liid ted to, hardscape treatment' ; and patternsi landscapinSh trellises, kioaks,-street furniture, seating` area, :plazas,'building Features, signage, etc. The 'final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. r 24) The final design of the; retaining Vn3, ,along the freeway off-ramp shall be reviewed-an:?;:.approved by the Design Review Committee prior,ta isRuance of any building permits for the center. 2S), Pursuant to provisions of California ljabli::'Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not'be operative, vested, or final, nor :ill t:Ailding permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the ' Notice of Detexrination (NOD) regarding; the agsoc atea environmeAtal action is filers and pcsti ; with the Clerk of the Hoaid .of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, and`, (2) any and all ; required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Coda Section' 711.4, together with�,,31ny required handling .charges, are Maid to the County Clerk of the"County-of San'Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Department with a`stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt' showing that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exemr)t fram such filing 'fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or th'e'�,y guidelines ' promulgated 'thereunder, e�ccept, for payment of any required handling charge far filing a Certificate of fee Exemption, this,conditi64 shall be deemed null and void. Pi•',NNING COMMISSION LRESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 - SOOTHIM.MARKET PLACEr June 26, 1991 Page 7 J F,�istoric Presergati.on '( _ 4 l) The applicant shall sponsor a City approved Oral 7 History ,,Program of the pioneer wine-making families of the subject area. The program shall,be completed prior to the iri1-iance.,of any building permits fort: Center. 2) The exieti.pq structures shall be documented fully according to ILABS/HAER standards by an 'rchitect ' approved by the City and paid'for by the i pplicant. The documents 'shall be submitted for review and / approval by the City Planner prior to :die ids' ance of 1 permits for either demolition or relocation. } 3) The applicant shall pffer to donate the Guidera,and DiCarlo homes to pari;ns demonstrating ownership of a' parcel within 'the 'City of Rancho Cucamonga suitable j" for such relocation. These homes shall be available for such donation aver a period of 180 days and the applicant shall pay for relocation' 'costs. Adve,tisements shall be,placed'in the Snland valley Daily Bulletin and Tate Sun newspapers, at a minimum, every, weekend dvriny the 180-day period. The size of the advertisement shal ;be one-eighth-, page and the ; content shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the submittal to the newspapers. Parcels.located 3n the historic community of Etiwanda will be given first preference. All documentation demondtrating compliance with this condi*,ion shall be - submitted to the City PlL ner prior to'the issuance of demolition permits: r 4) The applicant shall incorporate the familial and architectural past of the area into commissioned public art integral to the architectural design of the project. This artwork shall .portray southern Etiwanda's wine-making past in a realistic style and the applicant will submit no 3ess than three alternatives, in no. less' than three _different artistic ; mediums, for the Historic Preservation Commission,',s review. "The final specifications;.for this .architecturally integrated artwork shall be approved by 'the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. I 5) The applicant shall use personal names and-.those of associative qualities, such as winery, names or wine labels, oz, the projegt site wherever possible and appropriate with the approval of the center's Uniform :sign Program. Cf 11. u PLMMING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 9R-37 - FOOfFiILL MARKET PLACE �,D ;* r June 2.6, 1991 Page 8 - -� Aft 6) No demolition pGtmits' shall be issued for existing structures within the project site until the issuance of building permits for any new,structure,' :j The applicant shall contribute up to $100,000 to evtablish a funl for the reconstruction of a 2}000 ',qu&vw foot 1�arn at the site '_pf the City owned thaffey-Garcia house, wherein 7:._�al' wine industry artifacts will be documented and,'fdisplayed. Said tunds shall be donated prior to the issuance of demolition permits. The design of 'said structure shall follow the design of; the original Chaffey- Garcia barn and its execution shall be subject to review and approval of. the Historic Preservation Commission in the form of- a Landmark Alteration Permit. Engineering Division.' 1) Existing Overhead Utilities a. Foothill Boulevard - JL in-lieu fee as contribution to the future' = ndergroun'ding of the existing overhead utili� �1 (telecovmunicaton and electrical) on the opposite side of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid.to the City prior to the Issuance of building per.nits. The fee- shall be one-half of the 'City adopted unit amount times the length'frtxn the center of Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly terminus. b. Etiwanda Avenue - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergroundinu of the existing overhead utilities (electrical except for the 66 kv electrical), on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Foothill Boulevard to the south project boundary. c. Overhead utility'-service lines which cioss'r Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be removed concurx'grtly with the -removal. of the existing houses on the 'south side of Foothill Boulevard. 2) Foothill Boulevard shall be constructed from Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly project boundary as follows: 4.. K. 11 _ t. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET ,PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 9 MW t a. Full width on the soutil side including the median} curb: b. The ultimate back`bne system on the north side ' :. cone,':ating of two travel lanes (27-foot., wide pavement) and,' the .median curb or, as otherwitle _ approved by the Cit­engineer.' c. LandscappY the median island. The de$eloper may request aNxeimbursement agreement to recover the cost of one:=halt width of landscaping frorting his project'from,;future development .of across- the-street,propertes. d. Construct, a completer intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boul;r'vard with -transitions'to", -. meet ezistirg pavement east on Foothill BoulevaY.9 " and noljth'on Etiwanda Avenue, Also the traffic jignal(i,Ahall be modified^at the intersection '-of Atiw,anGd Avenue and Foothill Bouleva 'Ih s Both _ items'shall be as approved by the City .IgAneer. ' e. The dayeloper shall ba eligible for `fe credits against and reimbursement from the Trans O'rtation Oevelol ent :wee fzs the_portion of .improvements determined by the City; 'Engineer to be of supplemental siza, length,"or,capaciey over that needed or .the impact of this development ;in conformance with Ordinance No. 455. 3) The tk&Efic signal shall, be installed at the main entrance, on Foothill Boulevard at the ,develop;-r's expenae. 4) The median islitnd within Foothill Boulevard shall be moved southerly`ao that it is symmetrical about the centarline or 'ao otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 5) The Foothill Boulevard busbay shall be moved weetorly to be as close as possible to the median opening to reduce potential jaywalking across Foothill Boulevard. b) Etiwanda Avenue shall be widened on both sides as neceseLni to accommodate the street improvements necessary: to mitigate' the traffic-impacts of the project as required by the City Engineer. # 161 / ; r PL7,".LING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 - FOOTHfiLI MARKET-'.PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 10 7) Provide double (opposite direction) left turn :,apes within Etiwanda Avenue to serve the project entrances, Cheatnut Avenuo„'and a future driveway on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer 8) Provides a curb-adjacent sidewalk for the buebay on Foothill Boulevard, Also, the curb-adjacent=sidewalk for the busbay on Etiwanda Avenue shall„be minimized. 9) Provide a meandering sidewalk>in accordance with;City Standard No. 3G4 on Etiwanda,Avenue_' The sidewalk on Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall meet all driveways at the zero face of the curb return except ' for the main entrance on`Foothill Boulevard and as otherwise approved 'q the- City Engineer. 10) A ,final traffic ''study 'Awing calculations, for the determination of:the length of all left''turn lanes on Foothill Boulevard and-Etiwanda Avenue based on posx i010 traffic conditions shall bft submitted, to and approved by the City Engineer .priior, ro ff1hal map 'i approval:or issuance of building Verm' 8, whichever -" ` occurs first. All street facilities shall be installed;ss required by tte City Engineer. 11) A- lot line adjustment shall be recorded to incorporate the :northerly' portion of AP:? 229-021-�59 and the westerly portion of-APN 229-031-16 into this project prior to the iseuance :of building permits. 12) All of the project drivewayez and the internal drive aisles to be ussed by trucks shall be designed to accommodate the Caltrans standard 50-foot radius turn template unless' justification is .provided for a lesser design radius as approved- by ' -the City Engineer'. 13) The property necessary for the proposed freeway off- ramp at the northwest corner of the site shall be reserved. It- appears that Caltrans will not allow the retaining_wall shown on the plans; therefore, additional land to what is shown on the plans will need to be reserved as approver: by Caltrans and the j City Engineer. Also, the project plans will need to be modified accordingly. 14) Drainage fees for the development shall be paid as follows: J --VS I 2LANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP`90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 11 a:" Etiwanda/San Sevaine area feeu -for the portion of the site within that area boundary. (easterly bt acres). Jf b. General City area 'fees for the-portion of this site outside of the'Etiwanda/San Sevaine area. c. A pal lent equivalent to the Day Creek Mello Roos Assef.sment of $4,675 per acre for the portion of the site currW.ly,outside the Day'Creek Channel Mello Roos District boundary. c' 15) Approval shall be obtained from, the'Municipal Water ' District and San Bernardino County Flood" Control District to 'accept the existing flews from north of Foothill :Boulevard to the facility along`Arrow Highway and Day Creek Channel. If such approvals" cannot be obtained,"alternate facilities nuch as those required by the Etiwanda/San, Sevaine Drainage - Policy (Area 9) shall be provided as approved by the City Engineer.. i 16) Intersection drd,'sAs_hall be provided across Foothill Boulevard at Etiwanda Avenue sized to convey as much flow as feasicle'as,approved by the City Engineer. tr 17) Drainage facilities shall be extended to the north ec's of Foot 111 Boulevard along the project frontage to collect as.,much'flvld as feasible as approved by the city'Enginesr 18) Adequate provisions 'shall be made for acceptance for disposal of the drainage ,entering the property,from the adjacent Caltrans area to the west. 19) The small portion of the southeast. corner of the property shall be regraded to drain tothe Municipal Water District facility. 20) Construct storm drain facilities to serve the site generally as shown on the plans and as described in the project's preliminary drainage report subject, to final plan check and` a final drainage report as approved by the City Engineer. 21) Easements for and permission to construct storm drain facilities on and convey flows to off-site propertie(-,f, shall be obtained and provided as approved by the{ G City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. }� `µ CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991` Page 12 22)',)Easements for public storm drains within the site shall be provided. 23) The developer and the City, shall enter into an agreement that transfers maintenance responsibilities" from the City to, the developer for the drainage l facilities serving Foothill'Boulevard at such :time r ' that alternate facilities for disposing' of the f Foothill Boulevard drainage is provided and approved "p by the"Cit'y Attorney and City Engineer. 6. The Secretary to this Commission,shall certify to the adoption`of this Resolution. j APPROVED AND,AAOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA l BY, 1{ Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: .J) Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the "Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do- hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed," and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga', at regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June`1991E following wit: the fo lowin vote-ta- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ti✓' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT, COMMISSIONERS: i COTT OUT DEPARTMENT OF a ►��� ���a���d�aCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A VAN AN U PARU UUNUI I KiM01%) PROJECT#: &22//h✓ -lie-C?T SUBJECT: �t�?7s1ilG /ylsLQrE €�E APPLICANT: Aa M1T-,5cW LOCA T ION: (3rl S', {/!L Fs�LV �� Y �-�•�Yo.�ibY,�l.�/O�F Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714)989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits I Qjplaim Dote y 1. Approval shall expire,unless extended by the Planning Commission,it building permits am not issued orapproved use has not commenced within 24 monlhs from the date ofapproval. _2. Developmentl0esign Review shall be approved prior to / /. Jam_ 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of 4. The developer shall comrnenco,participate in,ands,onsurrvnate orcause to be commenced. participated in,or consummated,a Mello-Roos G,mnrunity Facilities District(CFD)for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dtstrid to finaince construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located,designed,and built to all specifications of the Rarmho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and shall become the Distrieft property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. in any building of a station,the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and!sgulations.The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first,the applicant shall consent to, or participate in,the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary'school facilities. However,ff.any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District.the applicant shall, in the alternative,consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits.whichever comes first.Further,9 the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the record3tion of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project,this condition shall be desmed null and void. p �SC-2/91 1 of 1"' ( ' 0 37 �•omplevort Duc This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any am all school AOL impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prlorto recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved,written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Suoh letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval inthe case of subdivision orpriorto issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B.Site Development 1. The sit'shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which -J—/— include site plans,architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division,the cond!tions contained herein> Development Code regulations,and e54Z Irge AJ14---k ez, Specific Plan and i Planned Community. V/ 2. I)rior to any use of the project site or business activity Wng commenced ton, all Jam_ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City 'lannt 1/ 3. Occuparmyofthefacilityshall not commence unt:yuoh time as all Unifonn Building Cock and --/_J t State Fire Marshall's regulations have been compiled YAh. Prior to occupancy,plans shall I! be submitted to the Rancho Cucam inga Fire Protection D!,.*ict and the Building,and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliarxe prior to occupancy. two 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of approval shall be --J /_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. S. All site,grading,landscape,irrigation,and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for 1---/_ consister+ y prior to issuance of any permits(such as grading,tree removal,encroachment, building,etc.),or prior to final map approval{i the case of a cL-,iom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sgctions of the Development - -Jr/-Code,all other applicable City Ordinances,and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. ✓ 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and al-roved by the City Planner and -__--J— Sheriffs Department(989-6611)prior to the issuance of buiLmg pern9w Such plan shall indicate style,illumination,location,height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided,all trash pick-up shall be for individual units _J_� with 0 receptacles shielded from public view. ✓ 9. Trash receptacle(s)are required and shall rnest City standards. The final design,locations, --J---J and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Aft i t0.All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers,AC cm :",sets,etc.,shall _ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use x;a combination of y concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Pros«:�s:�'uc�lG•37 1 C mfp eum 03te- 11.Street names shall be sgbmitted for City Planner reviev<znd approvai.ihi accordance with the adopted Street N; I.ng Policy prior to approval of the tinal map. 12.Ali building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concisemanner; including proper illumination. 13.A detailed plan indicating trail widths,maximum siopes,physical conditions,fencing,and weed control,in accordance with City Master Trail drawings,shall be submitted for City Planner review and approvalpriorto approval and recordationof the FinalTract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans.Developershall upgrade and construct all trails,Including fencing and drainage devices,in conjunction with street improvements. 14.The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions(CC&Rs)shall not prohibitthekeep;ngof equine _J_ animals where zoning requirements forlhe keeping of said animals have baen met.Individual lot-vwners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals withoutthe necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners'associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15.The Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions(CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_l_ Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney.They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or l prior to the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A recorded copy shall be proWded to the City Engineer. 16.Ali parkways,cpen areas,and landsmping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to th'e City. Pruof of this landscape,maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City',Engineer review and approval prier to issuance of building permits. 17.Solar access casements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a soar energy system.The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits,whichever comes first.The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation,structures,fixtures or any other object,except for utility wires and similar objects,pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18.The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and _/—J_ maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. . Any further modiications to the site including,but riot limited to,exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exteriorof the buildings or structures,removal of landmark trees,demoliition,relocation,reconstruction of buildings or structures,crchartgesto the site, shall requite a�noddicatlon to the Historic Landmark Alteration.Permit subject to.Historic Preservation'Zommission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units Jam— and'or heating any swimming pool or spa,unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and eff iciency.All swimn ingpoolsinstalled atthe time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be inemded in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval i prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side aW rear et�gz..ons upgraded with architectural !_ treatment,detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. sc-2/9n sorts /-Z-SD f ° Cmplenm Dme- 3. Standard patio cover plans for usa by the Homeowners'Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. y 4. All roof appurtenances,including air conditioners and other root mounted equipment and/or --1--J_ projections,shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access(indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6feetand shall r l� contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall(including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways irx9 textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be �---�— provided throughout the development to connect dwe"ingstunits/buikiings with open spaces/ plazastrecreational rt_'as. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances,.and exits shall be striped per-City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in J_I_ depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants,conditions and Restrictions shallrestrictithe storage of recreational vehicles �--�— on this site unless they are the principal sourc,)of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisis5 other than n desig,tated visitor parking areas. —,6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer,and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Prolection District reviewand approval prinrto issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping(for publicly maintained landscgwr;areas,refer to Sqctlon N.) d 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan,including siopeolanting and modal tome landscap -/�— Ing in the case of resloential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prlorto the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. I 2. Existilg trees required tobnor served In place shall be protected with a construction barrier -1 in acoordance with the Munlcipal Code Section 19.08110,and so rioted onthe grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and now locations for transplanted trees shali be shown on the d!stalled landscape plans;The applicant shall follow all of the arborisls rammmendatans regarding preservation,transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Arr:inimumof trees pergross acre,wmprised of thefollowing sizes,shall be provided Within the project: %-48-inch box or larger, %-36-inch box or larger, %-24-inch box or larger,_%-15-gallon,and;_ %-5 gallon: 4. A minimum of of trees planted wiu1'+-thp ivied stiwu be specimen size trees-- 24-inch box or larger. S. Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three1'� parking stalls,sufficient to shade SO%of the,parking area at solar neon on August 21. t 2/9 t 4 of 12 '3 ' - � 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and'along structures at a rate of one � e tree per 30 linear feet of building. -l=/ 7. All private slope b4nks5feetor less in vertical height and of 5:1 orgreaterslope,but less than 2:1 slope,shall be, at minimum,irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planti, a required by this section shall include a permanent Irrigation system to be installed by th developer prior to occupancy. 8. All private slopes in excesiof 5 feet,but less than 8 feet inv6. al height and of2:1'orgreater -y--� slope shall be landscaped and inigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows:one 15-gallon orlargerslzetree per each 150 sq.ft of slope area,l-gallon orlarger size shrub per each 100 sq.ft.of slope area,and appropriate ground cover.in addition,slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq.ft. 3f slope area.Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane.Slope N,._,,:!t-n9 required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development,all slope planting and irrigation shall becontinu- ously maintained Ina healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit ic;sold and occupied bythe buyer.Priortoroleasingoccupancyforthose units,aninspection shall be corv,;�ted by the Planning Divlskt n to determine that they are in satisfaLKory condition. 10.For multifamily residential and non-residential development,property owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site,a -Nell as contiguous:. planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall'be kept frae from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy K< .'thriving condition, mid shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11.Front yard landscaping shall be r per Development Code and/orb_ g required rthe street trees and slope plaiting. .This requirement shall be In addition to tho required vr/ 12.The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls.landscaping,and sidewalks,shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approve'and coordinated foroonsistencywith-iny parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. �3.Special landscape features such as mounding,alluvial rack,specimen size trees,meander- —��-- ing sidewalks(with horizontal change),and Intensified landscaping,Is required along ✓ 14.Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installedwilhin the public right-of-way on _/ /_ the perimeter of the ro p Jea area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 15.All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment.If located in public maintenance areas,_ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineerirg'Division. a, 16.Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and -J I approval prior to issuance of buikitng permits, These criteria shalt encouratie the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 17.Landscaping and irrigation eh_ii ba designed to conserve water through the principles of _ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter t9,16 bf the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SC•2/91 5 of 12SZ s: pm'w NO F.Signs,. � .�., f Gxndietiti Due• �1. The signs Indicated orl the submitted plans are conceptual only and riot apart of thisapproval, Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Manning Division priorto installation of any signs. tf'Wa_' M 2. A Uniform Sign Program forthis development shall be submitted for etpfft= review and approval prior to issuarr;e of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s)shall be provided for apartme>t,condominium,or townhomes —J_J prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by,the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rods Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,priorto accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted -J--�— Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, Ina standard format as date.mined by tiw City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway _/_ project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on arry property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuationto below 45 CNEL,the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate,verity the adequacy of the mitigation measures.The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H.Other Agencies 1. Emergency secondary accessshallbe provided inaccordancoWdh RanchoCucamonga Fire — Protection District Standards. 2. Emergency access shall be provided,maintenance free andclear,aminimnumof26teetwide at all all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be _/_!_. submitted tothe Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available,pending completion of required fire protection system. 4. The applicam shall contact the U.S.Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and _J__J 'j location of mail boxes.Mufti-family residential developments shall prove a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting.The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead sirucNsd shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. S. For projects using septic tank facilities,written certification of acceptability,including all I —�—� supportive information.shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Departmern of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tarkt Permits,and prior to issuance of building permits. SC-2r91 6cr12 )�ple4on Dem: APPLICANTS SHA" CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION,(714)989.1863, FOR ,MSLCOMPLIANCE With THE FOLLOWING'"CONDITIONS: I.Site Development 1.The applicant shall compiywith the latest adopted Uniform Building Code,Uniform Mechani- cal Code,Uniform Plumbing Code,Natiorui Electric Code,and ail other applicable codes, ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoptloo Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits fora new residential dwelling unn(s)or major addition --/---� to existing unst(s),the appitcartshallpaydevelopmentfeesatthe established rate.Suchtees may include,but are not timitedto:City Beautification Fee,Park Fee,Drainage Fee,Systems Development Fee,tarmit and Plan Checking Fees,and School Fees. 3, Prior to issuance of building permits for a new oommrciai or industrial development or _J�— addition to an existing development,the applicant shall pay development tees at the- established rate.Such fees may include,but are not limited to:Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee,School Fees,Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official,after tract/parcel map rerordation _!___i and prior to issuance of building permits. J.Existing Structuraa 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Buying Code for the property line clearances considering use,area,and fire-sasistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing in F.x st ng buildings snail{be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be dcmolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed,filled anri/orcappedtocomplywiththe —�—I Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to bs located and shown on buildinlg plans submitted for _!^J— building permit appiioatlon. K.Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be In accordance with the Uniform Building Cade,Chy --l—r Grading Standards,and accepted grading practices.The final grading plan shall be in. substantial conformance with the Wrovod grading plan. ✓ 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to - -� perform svc9h,Work. 3. The d.vebpment is bested within:the soil erosion control boundaries;a Soil Disturbance — J- Permit is required.Plutase contact Sari Bernardino County Department of Agr=lture at(714) 387-2111 for permit application.Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of Tough grading permit. 4. A geobgicat report shalt be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted 3t —the time of application forgra&ig plan check. +� 5. The f inal grading plans shall be completed and approved p dotio issuance of building permits SC-2/91 70i12 'Gm+oleu Dacc 6. As a custom-lot subdivision,the following requirements ehall be mat: a a.Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion ofallon-site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and prorto the issuance of grading permits. b.Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drzinage water That are cond,:r:ted onto �—�— or over adjacent parcels;are to be delineated and recorded to the satisi-ion of the Building and Safety'Division prior to Issuance of grading and building perrahs. c.On-site drainage tmbrovements,necessary for dewatering apd protecting the subdivided properties,are to be"installed prior to issuance of Wilding permits'for'construction upon any parcel that maybe subject to drainage flows'entedrig, leaving,or within a parcel relative to which a bulkling,permit is requested. d.Final grading plans for each parcel are to bo submitted to the Building and Safety —�--�-- Division for approval fu,orto issuance of bunting and grading permits.(This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e.All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seer',i with native grasses --(--1— orplantodwrth ground coverfor erosion control upon completion otg'rading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Suilding Official.In addition a permanent irrigation system shah be provided. This nquirement does not release the applicantiVeaeloper from compliance with the slcr a planting regvirements of Section 17.68.0401 ofthe Development Code. APPLICANT SMALL CONTACTTkE ENGINEERING OIVISiON, t714)9.8-1062,FOR COiU6PLIANCE i WITH THE FOLLOWING CONOiYIONS: L.Dedleatfon mW Vehicular Acrxrss _1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails,public paseos,public landscape areas,street trees,and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans andfor tentative map, Private easements f1L.non-public l facilities(cross-lot drainage,local feeder trails,etc.)shalt be reserved as shown on the plans ancVor i^ntative map. i 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rigttts-of-stay on the perltneter streets —1--5— (measured from_reet centerfine): �.lpi�P_LEleftWaot on �i /lL Yb ftk~onT//t/�NU9 total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of ded;^lion for--foot wide roadway easement shall be made for all private streets ordrives. 4. Non-vehicular ass shall be dedicated to the City e for the following streets: i Y'. 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by dead.,and shall be recorded cone urmntty with the map or prior to the issuance of buik;i tg permits,where no map is involved. -T SC-2121 aof12 c,•-`eon oar: 6. Private drainage easements forcross-iot drainage shall beprovided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map, IW_7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-toot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring lot.adjoloing the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: TWe hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of(residential)buildings(or other structures)within those areas designated on the map as building res,,'Itan areas." A maintenance agreement shall also begrvted"from each lot to the adjacent lot through the `l CC&R's. 8. All exiling easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequfclaimedordriineatedon the final map. V 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-wa• !v J_ shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach auto private property. °/ 110.Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes.to provide a minimurn of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs.If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane,a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11.The developershall make a good faith effortto acquire the requirecloff-she property interests —T_J necessary to construct the required public improvements,and It he/she should!11 to do so, the developer shall,at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final reap for approval,enter into an agreement to complete the Improvements pursuant to Government`Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property Interestsrequired fortheimprovements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by ttm develbperof all costs Incurred by the City r. to acquire the off-sit e propertyi interests required in connection with the subdivisiar.Security i fora portion of these costs shall be In the form of a cash deposit in the.mourtgiven in an appraisal report obtained by the developer,at developer`s cost.The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M.Street improvem®tlts 1 landscaped;xib c Improvements(interior streets drainage facilities,community frail;t,,.,tieos, ped areas,etc.)shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall ne constructed to City Standards. Intarlor street improvenwrits small include,but are not;imited to,v40 and gutter,AC pavernant.drive approaches,sidewalks,street tights.and street tress. 2. A ntinimum of 26-foot wide pavement,within a 40-foot vrWs dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-sectlor,Streets. 3. Construct the!olkraing perimeter street Improvements including,but not limited to: STREET NMAE CLI. I& A O. SIDE DRIVE STREET COrr,�f.WED OVP1 rt '^-WT LL WA APPR. UGH75 TRSES MWL ISIANM O HER J TiwR�.�._.. ✓ cj!� s/ ✓ ✓ ✓ yr. --w r 1 f-,SC 2/91 9 of 12 — A i Notes (a)Median island includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter: (b)Pavement Completwn D.w reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check."(c)if so marked,side- walk shall be'curvilinear per STD.304. (d)If so marked,an in-.lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights,prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer,shall be submitted to and roved b ,ap "H E ineer.Securk approved Y. y n9 >r shall be posted and an agreement executed tb the satisf=fit' ' .;fie City.Engineer and lira City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public r'_..ar private street Improve- ments,prioctofinal map approval erthe issuance of b.gilding permits,whichever;jccurs first. b. Prio-to any work being performed In public right-of-way,fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other Permits required. C. Pavement striping,marking,traffl a.~',eat name slgnirg,and lntorconrem conduit shall be installed to the satisfacti' ,the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes sho -tahadon arty i +constructionorreconstruction of major,secondary or c©liee -which intersect faith other major,secondary or collector streets for future f- c sign. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the streetat3teet ouCside of BCl:;FOR oranyother locations apperivedbythe City'Engineer. Notes: J� (t)All pull boxes shall be No.5 unless ntherwise specified by file City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel withputiropa. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be Instated an all four comers of intersections per City —J Standards er as di"Wed t: Phe City Engineer. f. Existing C"y roads requiting construt lon shall remain open to traffic€1 all times with -�—� adequate detesursduring ronsteus�loA'A street closure permit mate be required.A cash deposit shall be providad io cover�118 cost of grading and paving. which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage,flows shali not=sssidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be __1_1_. I installed to City Standards,except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. i. Street nanns shall be approved bylthe C4y,Piannerpftrto suth nrial for first plan check. 5.Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval try the City Engineer. Prior to any worts being performed on the pri- vate streets, fees ohall be paid and oamt action permits shag be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addlWn to any other permits required. 6.Street trees,a minimurnof 15-gallon size or larger,shall be installed per C4 Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. SC-2/91 Id of12 V�K-5 7.Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. a. On collector or larger streets,lines of sight shall be plotted for all project i.�tersections, including driveways.Wails,signs,and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and othbr obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street Intersections shall have their noticeability improved,usually by moving the 2+/-closest streettreeson each side away from the street and placed in asireet tree easement. 8.A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: _J_I_ 9.All at blic improvements on the following streets shall be operationally c arnpiete prior to the --�—� issuance of building permits: N.Public Maintenance Arias 1.A sepasate set of landscape and Irrigation plans per Engineering Public:Yorks�fartdards J-1-- shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval pries to final map approval' or issuance of twilling permits,whf;haver occurs first.The fol!;�Ing landscape parkways, medians, are Squired to be annexed Into the Landscape klainteraance:District: �TY(rAN�9 //✓e` 3F �Cdl�//Lt �k'Y� ` `� 2.Asigned consent and waiver form to join artd/orform the appropriate Landscape and Lighting f_J_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer pdorto final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever cccurg—Vist.Formation costs sh_ail be ben,e by the developer. 3.All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuou5tymalntainedbythe developer until accepted by the City. 4.Parkway landscaping on the following street(s)shali conform to the results of the respective J—J BeaWilication MaAer Pfcm ®.Drainage and Floor!Cameo! 1. The project(or portions thereof)is located within a Flood Hazard Zone:therefore,flood' �---� protection measures shall be provided as cortilled by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2.It shall be the developer's responsibiltty to have the current FIRM Zone J� designation removed from the project arms. The developers engineer shall prepare all necessary reports,plans,and hydtoIcg VhydrauI;c calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR)shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map apprcgai or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs'first;A Letter of Map Revision(LOMR)shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance,whichever occurs first. 3.A final drainage study shall be submitted to aW approved by the City Engineer prior to final _J--J— map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be Installed as required by the City Engineer: SC-2/91 11 of 12 Pto Vo.: 4.A permit from the Complenan Date p my,Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-vray. 5.Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diametei of any public st arm drain,pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6.Public-form drain easements shall be graded to convoy overflows in the event of a J--�— blockage in a sump catch basin or:the public street. 1 P.utiliflUs i 7<Provide separate utility services to each parcel tictuding sanitary sewerage system,water, gas,.eiectrb.:power,telephone,and cable TV(aitLnderground)in accordance with the UNhy Stanclards.Easements shall be provided as required: 2.The developer shalt be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary., 3.Water and sewer plans shall be dasigred and constructed to meet file regUiromenis of the --��- Cucamonga County Water District(CCWD).Rancho Cucarnonga'Fire Protection District, and the EnvirDnmental Health Department of the Courity of San'r 8maMIM,A letter of compliance fiorrrthe CCWA is required prior to final magi approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Q.General Requirements and Approvals —� y.The separate parcels contained within the Project boundaries shall be legally corztined into one parcelparcel prior to issuance of bW:';2ing permits. 2.An easement for a joint use driveway shall be prayWed prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever Occurs,first,for. 3.Prior to approval of the fiinal map a deposit shall its posted with the Gift'covering the: estimat0d cost of arMOnloning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 'r 4.EtiwardalSan Sevafne Area Regional Mainline,Seccwdary+Regional,and Masteri iart JJ___ Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map a f'loval orpric r to building permit issuance,it no map Js involved. , ! 5.Permits shall be obtained from the following aggricies for wont within their right-of-way: S.A slined consent and waiver form to join and/or fs-1 r'aa Low Enforcement Community Facilities District shalf be filed with the City Erigineur y;, r: final map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 7.Prior to finalization'of any development phase,sufficient improvement plans shall be com- .J—J_ plated beyond the Phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage prOtedion to, the salisfactf?^;if the City Engineer.Phase boundaries shall co aspond to lot lines shown on the 3ppr0;1W'1'.11entative map. se,-2/9 t 12 of 12 f — CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIQNGA STAFF REPORT f DATE June 25,-1991 r� f/ TO: Chairman`and Members of the Planning Comm#'ssion FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Ping Kho Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 137.24 - THE su K s on o acres o . an nto lb parcels n a Regional Related Cdnercial and Light Industrial designations of tha Foothill_ Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4), located at the souih side of. foothill Bbalevard between':Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue-`-- (APN 229-031-03 thru 13, 15, 1E $,20.) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re guested: AQprovaI of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on x� � B. � B. Parcel Size: Parcels range in sit` from .51 to 13.55 acres, refer,, torte a e on Exhibit "B". ,a C. Existing Zonis: Commercial,-and/or Industrial Park. D. Surrounding,,Land Use: North -.Mixed-Use South - 'M.WaD. facil it�y, Indust,,fal Plant and Vacant East - Vacant and Single Family,'Residential West - Interstate 15 and Vace '� t E. Surrouiiding General Plan and DFlieiopment Code Designations: North Commercial ✓� III South - General Industrial East -Commercial and; Low (Residential (2-4 Dwelling units per acre) West - Consnercial 1� F. Sita Characteristics: The` northerly portion of the site has ,> existing houses wfth the maj rity of the property'.being`,vac�int. ITEi•i L ( ;� , PLANNING COMMISSION ST(�7F REPORT " TENT PM 13724 THE WATTSON CO June 26, 1991 Page 2 II. ANALYSISz The purpose of the Parcel Map is tocreate 15 parcels for the development, of a shopping center. The7 Master Plon for development of the site is on tonight's agenda as CUP 90-37. Therelationship of,the parcel lines to the site plan is shown'on Exhibit C. r Foothill Boulevard will be improved along the project frontage to 'Include full width improvements on the south side,;. median island. with landscaping, two 1an,'es on the,north side, reconstruction :of the Etiwan¢a _n Avepue intersection,, and a signal at the mar. entrance. �. The developer is requesting to relocate.wesL'erly the median opening on fit. Foothill Boulevard from where currently specified in the Foothill Specific Plan and to add a ,second loft turn-i only Median opening on Foothill Boulevard. A request to modify the r ul ati on element of the Foothill,Specific Plan is on tonight's agenda,aS_ SP Amendment 90-03." The driveways on Etiwanda"Avenue do not. conform to the standard Ci4r spacing requirements.Thi's creates a'Potential traffic conflict between heft turn movements to the northerly project driveway and to Chestnut Avenue. To minimize this potential confl ict, double left turn lanes wil be provided. .,This application was originally submittee'as a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map. The, applicant has removed the vesting designation, because not.all. of the project approvals 011s, etc.) have been obtained as yet, which is required by City ordinance, for'a vesting,map. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. to con ucted ;: fie d investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon =the environment are anticipated as a rssult of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration ice-appropriate. TV. CORRESP092M,: "Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding : ;,roperty owners and placed in the ini�.,u v=_?�:zy1Dai`ly Bulletin. 'Posting at the site has also been completede,' f 0, l} PLANNING COMMISSION 6W REPORT � - TENT PM 137241'= THE 4fATTSON CO June 26, 1991 „ Page 3 RP V. RECOWMENneTI .,r It is recommended that,the-Planning Com ission consider a 1npu an elements of the Tentative Parcel Map 13724: if after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. r. Respectfully submitted, Barrye; Hanson ° - Senior Civil Engineer BRH:PK:jh Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Map;' Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval` r`. r` �I �-3 CL Rw _ -,; VC ILAA f r" i ® i! viv WHO II h C' - e h t 'YOh'+�ytDbOha-t.Y71 tD t0 Yf .r I' �r,otor+naeoo:�®tnwtcr.�a a � � i nplI,its 4CYVO.'O OO.<_n.r v,C 00)N 0 o•. da IL to CF so p q d \ E A 19, {� JJJw ••acn�totol-watNR�kN Yfe� a� go . i ( ulfmwl �OIn1,11{InI1pIm1T 1^ h R@a ' a 1 hivh�,•s wn4xa m ..,story (V►, I II rtnnm'�»n;7�uarmti E: Q Noll tO�f <' Id1 .m'SS�1/�� n m r 4 >_ " Ixtwo a q IFIr"��i\J`tltt jd%L _ •� lgmgmiurt�nl�m�m�Jti�mlC.�I�nryn � �. 'll t ;.tiNHINIi}Ifi!Irkf�(tl l.. i �� �n ' r■illwlnNuuHlinitN811Np1q{a�l t�. ��; tI1mGi}HaHiiNi1Nl91 C;. u i {1'IHIIh71!NINII}N�[Oj n .„.n.. r® ;� �uwu1�, dIIIHINW�91IN11=: }ILg1yIJNlHHIINIHIIkMM(I(2 • �:`-3R'�iNlNflllB; �ittilW[HiNIh11N+sU111tiHID` �u�mi.. /uunTnluiunt; mnm,lmiwnunptnulmmj-: - P,nuumlmu mm�nuannun iol un. ��' wtN wtitN �uw�II�aNNw�:µl�:�l�i�tlt7 ,� •, sN rRllm ,•'� '\ `�` >� `IHII IMNltlHfiiN ,_ ° ,` ♦1., um5+ INII IM4llIININ \ ♦ •gA:wenu .(Po nuurtuwL°1 I 78 aim I IIIIHIIkHhn, l •� °w�twla�l�a` _ ?C� � •�81HIIdII l ,` �? � 17 Ca ��g RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 'CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NU11BER 13724, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH. ^-IDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BET{TEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND -'TIWANDA AVENUE, ,AND MAKING FINDIrIGS IN<,SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 229-031-03 through 13, 15, 16 & 20 WHEREAS, Tentative Farcei-�Map Nwhber 13724, submitted by The Wsttson Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing,:into 15 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California,.6 dentified as APN(s) 249-031-03 through 13,, 15, 16 & 20, located at the south side ofFoothill Boulevard between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue; and';, WHEREAS, on June 26, 1991, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-descrit:ad map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1• That the map is consistentwith the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvementswill not cause substantial environmental drmage or public health /problems ems or .have adverse aff�cta on abutting .progenies. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been _eviewec` ,and considered in compliance with the CaliforniZ/Environmental Quality Act of .1S70; and further, thij% Commission her Declaration. eby issues a Negative SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map -Number 13724 is hereby approved subject- to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Reciprp cal parking shall be provided by CC&Rs. ENGINEERING DIVISION 'It L- 7 \ v 1� ti PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, TPM 13724 THE WATTSON' COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page Aft `, 1. Existing Overhead Utilities a. Foothill Boulevard An in lieu fee as J, contribution to the,,future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (tolecomunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the approval of the 1:,nal Parcel Map. The fee shall be one half the Cis y adopted .unit amount(times the length from the center of Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly terminus pole. b. Etiwanda .Avenue - An In lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing._' - overhead utilities (electrial except for the'66 kv _ electrical) on the opposite sid(-,,of Etiwanda Avenue shall be said to the City prior to the approval of the-Final Parcel Man, The fee shall be one half the City .adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Foothill I}culevard to the south project boundary. j� c. Overhead utility 'service- lines which cross Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be removed concurrently with the removal ;of the existing hodiies or. tha -south 94de of Foothill Boulevard. 2. Foothill Bou}-�arrd shall be constructed from Etiwanda Avenue to th&, .dterly project boundary as follows; a. Full width on the oouth aide including the median curb. - b. The ultimate backbone system on the north side consisting of two travel lanes (27-foot wide pavement) and the median curb or as otherwise approved,by the City Engineer:. c. Landscape the median island. the developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of one•-half width of landscaping fronting his project from future development of across-the- street properties d. Construct a complete intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard with transitions to meet existing pavement east on rcothiYt'Boulevard r` and north on Etiwanda Avenue. Also, the traffic signals shall be modified at the intersection of' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TPM 23724 - THE WATTSON' COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 3 Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Both items shall be as approved by the City Fngineer. e. The devfls:oper shall be 'eligible for fee credits against and raimbursemsnt from the Transportation Development Fee for the portion of t- e improvements determined by the City Engineer to be, of supplemental size, length, or capacity over that needed for the impacts of this development in conformance with Ordinance No 455. 3. B traffic signal shall be installed at .the mail entrance on foothill Boulevard. 4. The median island within -Foothill Boulevard shall be moved southerly so that it is symmetrical about the centerline or as otherwise approved by the C'�ty Engineer. S. The Foothill Boulevard htr,y-ay shall be moved westerly to be as close as pose , a to the median opening to reduce Potential jaywalking across Foothill Boulevard. 6. Etiwanda Avenue shall be widened on both sides as necessary to zz-�+�modate the street improvements necessary to miti4,ata the traffic impacts of the project as required by the City Engineer. 7. Provide double (opposite'- direction) left turn lanes within Etiwanda Avenue to serve the project entrances, Chestnut Avenue, and a future driveway on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue or as otherwise apprcmed by the City Engineer. S. Provide curb-adjacent sidewalk for the busbay -on Foothill Bculevard. Also, the curb adjacent sidewalk for the busbay on Etiwanda Avenue shall be minimized. 9. Provide meandering -sidewalk-,,in acc,rdance with City Standard No. 304 on Etiwand4 Avenue. Sidewalks shall meet driveways at the zero face cur: 'return except for the main entrance on Foothill ttoulevArd or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 10. A final traffic sturdy showing calculations for the determination of the length of all left turn lanes on Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue based on post 2010 traffic conditions, shall be submitted to and approved by the Ciry Engineer p_• r to 'final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. All street facilities shall be r, installed as required by the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUT1014 NO. PM 13724.-�-- THE WATTSOU COMPANY June 26, 1995 PaQ3, 4 AOL 11. - A lot line adjustment shall be recorded to incorporate the northerly poeitior' of APN 229-021--59 an*;.; the westerly portion of APR 229-031-16 into this project prior to the approval of the Final Parcel Map. 12, All of the project driveways and the ilternal drive aislesi to be used by trucks shall be de3igned to accomodate the Caltrans standard 50=466t radius turn template unless juatificaticn is provided fora i8saor, design radius as approved by the City Engineer. 13. The property necessary for the proposed freeway off ramp at the northwest corner of the site shall be resQrved. It appears that Caltrans will not allow the retainingshown wall on the plane; therefore, 1 addW'bnal land to what .,s shown on the plans will need to be reserved .as approved by Caltrans and the City Bngineer. Also, the project plans will need to be ,modified accordingly. 14. Drainage fees for the Development shall be paid as follc:ws a. Exiwanda/Safi Sc;.Ans Area fee3 for the portion of the site within that area boundary (easterl.y 6t acres), b. General City area fees for the portion of this site outside of the Etiwanda/San Sevaina Area, and C. A;payment equivalent to the Day„^reek Mellow'Roos Assessment of $4,675 per acre for the portion of the site currently outside the Day creek Channel Mello Roos District Boundary.. 15. Appr_,,Yal, shall be obtained from MWD and SBCFCD tc- accept the existing flows ft: m north of Foothill' Boulevard to the :_racility along Arrow Highway{�and''Day Creek Channel. U such approva.,a can not be obtained,,,,-- alternate facilities such as those required by the``•, Et:wanda/San Sevaine Drainage, Policy (Area.'9) shall be provided as approved by the City Engineer. 16. " Intersection drains 'shall be provided across Foothill Boulevard at Etiwanda Avenue* sized to convey as mach "- flew as feasible as approved by the City Engineer. 17. Drainage facilities shall be extended to the north aide of Foothill Boulevard along the' ,project frontage to collect at. touch flow as feasible as approved by the City Engineer. APNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ' ?PM 13724 THE WATTSM COMPANY guna 26, 1991 z, Page 5. r _ 18. Adequsta Provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal 'of the drainage entering-the property from I the adJ44ent Caltrans,area to the west. ;. The small portion of the southeast corner of the property shall be regraded to drain to the MWD facility. 21. Construct storm drain ;facilities to serve the site generally as shown on the plans and am-,described in I� the project preliminary drainage report subject to final plan check and a final drainage report as approved by the City Engineer. 21. Easements for.and pelmission to t onstruct storm drain facilities on and convey £low6'to off-site,properties shall be obtainedand provided as approved by;b the City Engineer. � I 12. Easementh for public storm drains within the site shall be provided. i 23. The Developer-;rind the City shall enter into an' agreement that transfers maintenance responsibilities from the Cityto _ „the Developer p, .for the drains R.- � g� fEcilitiee serving Foothill Boulevard at scch time'.An the futur@ that alternate facilities'€or disposing of the Foothill Boulevaard drainage'` are, provided as approved;by the City Attorney and City-')Engineer. 24. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21C89(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the-Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action iQ filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors,of the county of s'dn Bernardino; and` (2) any, and all required filing fees, assesstad pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required hai:aling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino: The applicant shall, provide the Engineering Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid.' in the event this application is dete=klned�'e;cempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions' of the-California Fish and Game Code;., or the guidelines nromulgsted thereunder, except., for payment of any p• PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION,NO. II TqM 13724 - THE WATTSdN COMPANY June 26,,199' Page 6 „f f , n/ a�=1 required Handling charge. for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, tat=,condition'shali-be deemed nulljand void: BUILDING AND SAFETY`DIVISION I. All structures sh111 comply with property line protection requirements of the Uniform Building code as approved by the Building official. 71 FIRE SAFETY DIVISION' f , I. Upgrade the fire hydrants and supply system upon - , development. 2. The northerly portion of the project shall be annexed to Nello'RODS Dist*ict CFD 85-1. APPROVED AND ADOPTSA THIS•26th DAY, OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING WMMISSION OF.TH9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; BY. Larry T. McNiel, Cha'rman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning commission of the City of'Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cortify that the foregoing Resolution 'Was duly a;ld regularly irtroduded, passed, and adopted by the P7%nning CommiOsiori of the' City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of Junp'1991, bvt.he`following vote-to-wite AXES: OMMISSIONERS: NOES.*-` COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i 0 aN Ue NV � ut �� rd n Nw L N qA ail a �,� w� °"VGG ¢ D `tJy x'H e 'n J � �� aLN Woy Y•_ N� r nO �`^ yKu a.a c ua �ea� pTu ^pe waz i= ea„ _� aai LUM Or 'C 9^ �.q^Q� ��qC n anL N NW Ac �.A bn - 3� �crS Jtaw �� LA'N uO1 w -Z v2 =G_ �� L OM Ft EY 9. Cl Y y T'S a >r 6 F L y g < Go If 4 r Yp. 9 p' °� Ep ggsY9 rn� p� Y a. �(uGio�� L .K HI �a.L�i Q ? � b `"� z _ v SGy.Ns .cY nor g.Y �E"S.B10. o u. Q Yi=Y �, .. ELS .. « J. y C 4Y UE � oN wHsp'� g V G y E y .— gog I�gc88 u u w uo,ASk v 5g•..<w3 oa. o.°.. e 1 �a o . o, .fir �:M >�.� 20 N III ! I I jt 3 L� � C •. � bO> .0 Q+ +N 'VVVVVV� 4.= �N Cb aL MLu V r�N �ti. wa C p +1 �.d b Y d b C L �6 • 1 W - W ym � E � C A m •^ G .r..Q p.0 V m.s+ VU xq LNL > ►�� y� M ITN \2O yiY � r �c N:by GY6 Vp OVM . by N p' CE.Y r yy ". ay rE L T.�ti .Ly �49 LMG � Yy 00.. N W NC C�O 4'COL �C LpT {"� iiU4 KEN 6V< SQO .S4S SJtp .. s o Lo y y 41 N b+• d •L •' y,r `s' o �L I _ S A. s A a d Q( m ♦ iY V.p YA W y t o V 0 9 1 d per+ N LO O' A.a Ste, u - y A..�?i .... R ,C :u L CL dv Y L A O N L _ sy Ez. a LU d _E (� �� �� •� EN dV Cy'.w� C�y Apo d f Aa N Eu e • �y 64u� V Oridi aUOi_rn O e Y 0G0 O N� cY �O V OA � L A Lid 2f y.4.w L C 6 L C� A �O n� Er ry g tC �t�y pN V� •-� C EL E CC Cq L✓ pLc • d ya6 m • b iF a A OYp. 00 j V Ob E mU qea..` e ..aF �o u Qs EEp •`.no�� nn� am'-c Q.Rh oau' A O L L^�` � DEVELOPERS-REALTORS-INVESTMENTS f June 25, ,1991 HAND DELIVERED $r. Larry McNeil, chairman Planning commission City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Re: Planning Commission Public Hearing, June 26,: 1991; Request for Postponement of Consideration of Wattson Project: '_Aaenda Items J, K and L Dear Mr. McNeil: As you may recall, we are the owners of the property located to the east of the 1-�15 Freeway and north of Arroya'Route in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A map depicting our property in relation to the property which is the subject of the above referenced pu'plic hearing (Agenda items J, K and L),_is included as Exhibit 1 of the volume of Exhibits which accompanies this letter. The vap also shows property owned by others in the block bounded by I-103 on.the west, Foothill Boulevard on the north, Etiwanda Avenue on the east, and Arrow Route on tjie south- The purpose of this letter is to advise you of certain matters concerning the public hearing which has been noticed to consider, among other matters, the proposed development. of the Wattson Project, an approximately 60 acre retail/commercial<center immediately to the north and east of our property. A copy of the Notice of Public Hearing is 'included as Exhibit'2. We have bsen advised that a key feature of the Wattson Project is that its two ma:,or tenants will be a Price Club,and a Wal-Mart store. At the outset, we want to make it clear that we are not . in complete opposition to the Wattson Project. ' Indeed, for the most part we support it, and we especially support the plan of having Price Club,and Wal-Mart locate in the City in the proposed vicinity. To date, we have cooperated in numerousways with the 22706Aspan w.,Suite Vol,Lake Forest-El7bro,Califoiyt a 92630 Telephone(714)770-1633 Mr. Larry McNeil June 25, 1991 Page 2 f Wattson coi)pany in its attempt to process proposed development;. We have sharedplans with them,. we:have introduced ahem to prospective tenants, we have agreed to'sell them a '9.7 acre piece of property (the northerly portion of' our Tentative Tra^t 9326), which is a ;:key part of the proposed project (although they have not closed escrow yet and have had to extend the same) , and we have agreed to provide an easement to them for drainage, sewer, water and fire,hydrant purposes across our., remaining property if they do close escrow. Thus, in'many ways, we hope the Wattson Company, as general partner of Foothillji t Marketplace Partners, the owner of the Wattson Project, wii`l 0 succeed in its endeavors. In any event, and as }he remainder of this ,letter will make clear, while_there are many aspects .of the Wattson Project we support, we strongly oppose the traffic component''of the Wattson Project as proposed. We think the proposed streat plan is short sighted, is not in the best interests of the City, is damaging to the other property owners in the Block (including us), is inconsistent with many constraints' the City has always placed on us, is in breach of agreements Jhe City has'made with us as we have attempted to do our own planning, is contrary to II policies the City has previously promulgated,-and has reached this• stage w thout 'affording us anv (much less a reasonable or fair) opportunity to participate in the planning process and to present preferred alternatives The latter point. cannot be overstated because we are, in fact, still the owner of part of,. the property which is the subject of the proposed Project. How" i the process, got so far Without;our Participation is an absolute` mystery to us! Cons-'Wsntly, we strongly believe that, insofar as the Wat',:sor P.Y- " :arned, the currently noticed public heair4 --- u. ',ned. We hope you will agrea with us eadiii �`r},is 1 as ..':ter: In our opinion, there remain several issues that need to be resolved concerning the proposed which would be more appropriately resolved at one or more Ay sessions with the City and Wattson Company representatives -rather than at a public hearing. If you do not agree with us, however, then the matters raised in this letter, both those expressed above and the ones that follow, 'should be treated as 7 our objections to the action proposed to be taken at the public hearing and we expressly,reserve the right to challenge action taken based upon the issues raised in this letter as well as such. other issues as may by raised.at the hearing. Mr. Larry McNeil June 25, 1991, Page 3 1. The proposed tr £ic. plan does not best serve the` ' needs of the community. The Lite plan which is proposed for the Wattson Project is attached for reference as.Exhibit 4. As, you can see, the site plan provides fpr streets off of Foothill Boulevard only to the Project"-jroperty and does not provide for. street access from Foothill to my property or to property owned by others. In other words, the block has not been master planned. Not only is this spot planning approach not in the best interests of the community, it is also contrary to instructions the City has always given to us as we have attempted to develop our property. See letter of December 8, 1989, from Steve Ross to Bruce Mauner and attachments thereto which are enclosi"I as Exhibit 5. It is also a departure from City policy aria contrary' to City Resolution 89-070, adopted March 1, 1989 and related Staff Report dated January 25, 1989, both of which are included as Exhibit 6 See particularly page 0,P-9 of the January 25, 1989 Staff 'Report which depicts by diagram the relevant site area for planning purposes. Finally, the proposed traffic plan is based to an extent on mere speculation as to how the Wattson Project will develop and, even according to the current Staff Report, there could be "substantial changes" to the,pa�t of the Project immediately to the north of our property where the streets,i..:pact us the most. See Staff Report, p., J X 3, attached , as Exhibit 7. 2. The traffic study which was prepared in support of the Wattson Project was severely and innnnropriately confined in Its scone.. The traffic'study which was prepared in connection with the Wattson Project was_performed 'py'The Keith Companies in November, 1990. We have had`the study reviewed by Austin-Foust Associates, Inc., a highly regarded traffic engineering company (which has in the past been engaged as a consultant by the City). Please review the letter to us from Austin-Foust dated June '14, 1991, a copy of 'which is enclosed as Exhibit S. You will note that the Keith Engineering study is expressly limited'in its scope and is result oriented, in that it is overly influenced by the desires of the proposed major tenants, Price Club and Wal- Mart. The Keith CompaniesO study is alsoin conflict with , earlier studies performed by tha same firm in August 1988. See August 18, 1a88 letter from Thomas C. Carmody, Keith Companies Director of r-mgineering, to Russ Maguire, City Engineer, and attached street plan (Exhibit 9 to- this letter). In summary, the traffic.study assumes that the.Project will have no traffic ` impact outside the immediate boundaries of the Project. This is, clearly a faulty assumption for a project contemplating two major retailers, parking spaces for 3,200 automobiles and 30,000 vehicle trips a day from throughout the City and surrounding areas. Mr. Larry McNeil June 25, 1991 Page 4 3 If the City adopts the 'site plan proposed by the Wattson Project the City will breach its agreement with us. On "Uovember, 30, 1989, the City agreed with us that, if we hired ;Austin-Foust to perform a traffic study for the znti,re block, the City would adopt the Austin-Foust recommendations. Fora more detailed explanation of this issue, reference is ma(\to my letter to Paul R ug=au (City Traffic Engineer) date a.,,)pril 12 ,,�,991, which is enclosed as Exhibit 10. I am also enclosing a copy of the Austin-Foust study dated January 31, 1990, as Exhibit 1i, and copies of two update`letters dated September 25, 1990 and May 20, 1991, as Exhibits 12 and 13, respectively. :t a-recent ating which we attended with three staff members on .Tune 20, 1.491, we were advised by Rick Gomez that he did not :recall the City making this "agreement" and that, in any;event, the City.Z—_ could not,be held.to this "agreement" because proper channels were not followed. We do not now intend to 'debate whether Mr. Gomez is legally correct. We assert that he is not, but the resolution of that issue may have, to be decided at a later time. more important now is the moral issue. We were told`_the City would follow the Austin-,oust i}ecommendations and we have planned accordingly. Now the City proposes to ignore both us and those recommendations, without any satisfactory or timely explanation, or any chance for us to participate in the process prior to the - City Staff adopting its recommendations. This is simply wrong. 4. the proposed traffic Plan includes no consideration whatsoever that our property micjht and likely, will be developed with substantial commercial and office uses.' At our meeting with the. City representatives on June 20, 1991,-we were advised by Paul Rougeau, the City Traffic En<;'qeer, that he did not believe it was appropriate for the street system on this block to permit circulation between the wattson Project, which is a commercial project, and our property, which he describedi,as industrial. Of_course, Mr._Rougeau is correct that.our propertv"\ is zoned General Industrial. But, that does not mean we are % limited to strictly industrial uses. In fact, the zoning Wlearl_,r permits both commercial and office uses and it is equally clear that, given the development in the region that has 'occurred, the highest and best use of our property is mixed use., with a significant commercial and office element. Thus, internal circulation between''the two;tracts will be mutually beneficial. This issue will be further discussed at the public hearing. t I Mir. Larry McNeil June,25, 1991 Page 5 J S. An Environmental Impact Report is necessary. We have bean advised by legal counsel that the magnitude of this project, which is estimated to`=ino ease vehicular traffic: in the area by some 30,000 vehicle trips per day, should,definitely have. an Envircnanental 'Impact Report prepared in order {o .comply with the California Environmental Quality Rct. �thout`in'EIR, the City will be approving a p%7bject with potentially significant traffic, air quality and cultural impacts without knowing the full extent of those impacts. CEQA;also requires the City to consider the_cumulative impacts of all expected,traffic (and the resulting air quality impacts), including the impact of projects anticipated to be developed in the vicinity in,'-he future. The lack of internal circulation will clearly have an impact on the external streets (Foothill, Etiwanda and Arrow), but this impact is not add.-essed. Moreover, CEQA requireO that the Cityconsider reasonable alternatives to the Project, such as ,a smaller project' or a master planned approach to the circulation element of the entire block', but this has not been done. 6. The proposed traffic circulation Pattern doss not coordinate with, and ignores,'.the street pattern established by neighboring Tentative Tract 9326. Cur property to the south of the proposed Wattson Project is the subject of Tentative Tract 9326. A copy of-that map is submitted as Exhibit 14. As is ( evident, the top of the loop street which the City has insisted on as a part of Tract 9326 borders on the proposed Wattson Project. Yet, the Wattson Project does. not account for that street at all: This is a clear defect in planning. All.exhibits delivered with and referred to in,this letter are incorporated by reference. J Very truly yours, Daniel L. Plies and Anita I. Plies n f, - U Mr. Larry McNeil June 25, 1991 Page 6 cc: o-]aissioner Chitiea Commissioner Melcher commissioner molstoy Commissioner Vallette Mr. Rick Gomez, Community Deve,'lopment p rec r Mr. Brad Buller,°City Planners\• / Mr.. Paul Rougeau, city Traffic ngine'er Mr. Jack Lam, City Manager Mr. Torty Wattson, The Wattsoii Company Latham & Watkins =,I l 4 , I I rl { rr^: EXMITS TO LETTER DATED NNE 25, 1991 FROM``ANITA I. PLIES AND DANIEL L. PLIES ' TO MR. LARRY MCNEIL- CHAIRMAN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSIc` y , f CL I e ! W J a woo m ' { 1 -7-8N viva ! CA �J 1r� � I. 1-2MRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND;, TENTATIVE TRACT 14795 - HANDAH INTERNATIONAL 'ti\- A residential subdivision and design review for 13 condominium units`OA' 1.23 acres of lanii in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of the extension of Madrona � Avenue APH: 207-201-10, 11, and '4. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. ( J: ENVIRONMENT TnS S 0 Xnu BOULEVARD SPECIFIC COMPANY - A request to m the median break location on Foothill Boulevard, to add a median break location on Foothill B�"levard, and to _ change the land use designation froT Light f Industrial to Regional Related Commercial for - an area of approximately 26 acres within the �'�• Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4), located on the east side of Interstate 15, ' kp'South of Foothill Boulevard, These reques", are in conjunction with the development of a �} ±60 acre retail/commercial center located on the south side 62 Foothill Boulevard between 1� I-15 and 'Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 229-031-03rr- i`y thugh 13, 15',;f_5, and 20. Staff zecommends issuance of a "Negative Declaration., Related Files: Conditional Use Permit ' §tl-37 and I tTentative Parcel Map 13724. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIWAL U F PERMIT 90-37 THE WATTSON COS - A request .far master plan approval of a ±6o acre retail/commercial center containing approximately 550,000 square feet of leasable space and a request for apprcrzal of conceptual site plan and building elevations for the;Price' Club facility in the Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial designations of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4), located on the south side of Footh3.11 Boulevard between Interstate 15 and 'Etiwanda Avenua APN: 229-031-03 through 13, 15, 16, , -' and 20 Staff recommends issuance of a Mitigated Negative. Declaration, Related Files: Foothill ` Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-04 and Tentative Parcel Map 13,<24. ' f E. ENVIRgN ENTAL ASSESSMENT mor)ijICATION x0' CONDITIOrSAL USE PERMIT 86-06 - RIMAD STENTON -� - Modification of conditions of approval tc allow land uses requiring a more intensive parking ratio than the one provided.; nor research a,�nd development '(1 space _per i50 square feet:! w#;ii r an existing industrial complex `"ori -13 7 acr" of land in the General; Industrial District fsubarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific plan, located on the northwest corner of Buffalo and Gth Street - APR: 229-261-78. Staff recommends issuar,e of ' a Negative :Declaration. {Continued fron"lune 1 12, 1991.) nf; F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A Ci NDTT3jrA�US?e PEMT 91-03 JAMES PAGE - 'The req�st to establish a Wmini-mall' (swap meet) in a leased" space o1 103,552Lsquare feet within an existing indµstrial center on 13.77 acres of land-in the Gex;%ral Industrial District, (Subarea -�11) of the' Industrial Area Specific;Flan, locatud `at 11530 Sixth.�Street APN:� 229-026-28, Staff recommends Issuance of a mitigated 'Neyacive Declarat ot:.' Rela file onditimnal Ui�e �l Permit 8.6-06. (Corielft d from June.12, 1991.) G. ENT1 RONMEIQ 7Sc SSMENT ANiS DEVEZOpMEF•T7i' REVIEW;, DIVE9STE1B3 The development.-',of Phas III of - a neighborhood commercial shopping .enter consisting ofj, two retail buildings totaling 14,800 -)feet on 12.96 acres of land within an approved shopping center in the Neighborhood commercial District, located at the northeast corner of haven and .Highland Avenues APM 201-271-65 and' 71., //Staff recommends• issuance, of a Negative D_clytaton. J% mz ntinued from June 12, 1991.) H. ZMBONMENTAL AS"'ESSMENT AND c:ONDITIQNAL USE PMIT 9I-17 WTL7iJWS COMMUNITY C,MM-L-A PASTOR. FORREs� `x�tnr v - ,-The recruest to establish 'a huxch-ard school='in ' leased ,space cf 8,429 square feet within an existing,office park on +-D 12.59 acres of land in the Office Professional zones la-yated at L' 10601 Church 5t'Leet APt3t 1077r421-31. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. .-i , . s i E�. NVIRONP4ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIMF, PARCEL ® MAP 13724 - THE WATTSON COMPANY - A subdivision (sf 56.91 acres of land into 15 panelthe r- �, Tonal ,-Related Commercial: :in3 night Industrial,,' designations of the Foothill B0uievai0,,%4ecfir Plan (Subarea y),Jloc�t;ed on l the sa=uth side-of :Foothill Bo�xleva (! batween Ine^•s� te 15 'and Etiwanda Avenue 229-Z,31-03�ithrough 13, 15, 16, and 20. Staff recommends issuance 'of a Negative- Declaration. Related 'Files- Foothill Boulevard Specific=:Plan Amendment 90�O.k and Conditional Use Pem_jt-3o-31. ® M:_� CONPTTIONAL USE PERMIT 91-3 5 d SAtiTHWEST DESIGN GROL"P A request to establish a„ wholesale:/retail si?.k flower arrangement oustom manufacturing:-;use within the existing Arrow Business, Pail: on 9.i5` acres of land in the General Industrial Distr:a (Subarea 3) of the 'a! Industrial Specific Plan, located at 9087 Arrow R utu;, #120 .- APKI7. 2M3 013-19. ITEM WITHDRAWN. N. I UNNE Ate. AS ESSME14T AND TWATIVE TRACT 5�Ub -- .ETSWANDA HEIGH?P COI+ - A residential subdivision of`-, 68 single family lots an 53.05 acres of larl in th ` Very Law Res3ent"sal District: (1-2 dwelling .units p+ar acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the north and south sides Of Summit Avenue, 1XI approximately 1,3`b0 .~,feet- west;�•,of Etiwanda Avenue - APU: 2i5_11%=22 ;and 125-173:-02, 08, •'� 11,' and 16. Staff reco=ends issuance of a nitigated NegatiVL ;*1eclaration.. Associated with this project is Tree Removal Permit 9:k7,- l 0.' CONDITIONA', USE P � rm _:91-22 NA2�-sONAL BANit ThO, requ�tst to establish `An administrative and of acP,us,� in a leased space of 8,100 square .fee:: 'withi.a an existing industrial park in - the ' General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan, locat{d at 0495 1"9th Stree: APN> 209-032'=24. ® P; M.VIRONMM AL ASScGGMFNT AND �"% r,OPMx'PIT CODE j�vNDMENT 91-03 ,? CITY OF �2ANC#IO CLTCAAIONGA, ;- A 17equest to add ,Section 17.08..040-P aaid<'!3ection , 17.08.070-E to tl.e Development Coda a establishing property maintenance standards .aind - ongoing„ maintenance requirements For multiple family dwellings, (TO BE CONd'IEUED TO JULY 19, {i CI (1 • n VII. nld Business VIII Ptear� Business` IX. Director°s Reports Q. CONSIDERATION OF ADD�NG PET ',SHOPS AS A PERMIT?ED OR CONDITIONALLY PER14! R�1'EC USE IN'THE COMMEROIAL(OFFICE DISTRICT OF THE 1FOOTHILL BOALEVARDtSPECIFIC PLAN D X. Commission Business XI. Puhlic'4omments ®� This is -h e' t y i.x _Pine` and place for the;'general,public ;I to address the;CnmM.i:s.-,�ion. Itf ims to be discussed,-- - i 6 ' here are those which do not aiiready appear on this ager;la: . SIT. Adjournmenj, The Planning ComtissiGjx, has adopted Administrative Regulatio�ts that set an 11::00 P.M. adjournment time. Te items go beyond that time, they shAli be f' heard onky,.with:°the consent of the Commission. 1 0 L 0 _-..II. I�'�__ — -� w �� S•tttttt fA it �rmmrm'3 rrmmimmtmr ZVI c �i'i, al f I u�l II Iti: (• ,1�ca�un� fumwmuuuvui.�' gq aQ.l .%a L) _ n 111: wwall l I W o it Ilj l = t�if//,HF 11 ° ] 6a� °' In v ¢ y II ill - ICts�\\\\ , ri. 11 li I�%Y�%d/,%/�� ... '.:1 .�r�, , •: td c3 v,ui . it rwv If 111 °arnnnl «� 4 II II =GnJJ Jaa/////i� »� y a �NNn u 11 I if li �l ra4u i.: , m II fl .rr. u II�11 :UlltllQl�/,•i�l/fiA%1.t�( �- �� — — . � -� mrtmrniriumnin°ur `��� 'I l L u u lcuqumt� J Il�n ����) 111111111111NIIIIIIIIIIII� _ fl it � 1 911uuaulllliullll[II► , 5 it III m I' �IIIIIIHIIIIIpIi1111Lt1� a + It,11 r +t lI tU111111111{Ilililliill{It�l a x it' 1��L + I DltlllillllplllllilllfU1 'r t mmmtmrmurmrrmmrrmnu f,�} 4 „ u rl .��,antt�� D1L'Hll!IINiHIiIlIIEB 1 =WIIIIIiII{Il11{IIIII111111011h1�_ -� ii I tt t lIIIi1111111161U1 �611ilIIIIIIIIl,Iil@IlNlll{Ilillll8 a � I ` f'jlr��Nlia,\tUuuunuuwa'jj :mlunuwwtuifuua4c uuu '' •� -- �almmrmrmmtmrrrlrn. < x t111linrfimi.fitmimmrmmrm 51:11 'n s: (I Et mu 4 �--- -- n tj II II ^�"=,1 i. �✓%771 �/�///H��inliu\ �i y� : ; � � � >c -y a tr If .°c W `���111IIIillli{illlHlllll{IIIfl11IIIUl�IllililllfllllNillllllllllllllfli11111U' r Iwwtwlww _r111lI�IIIIIIIIIfINIItl1It �iriiluiuif M,U ''•,, �,-'�, al �II111111iIIII11i1811N° `� 16N1 IIIIIII(Il111911f1� r a o m ptrni'; i8111�1{illlllllllllll[fll tea : !t_ to •f 1, \�Nwwl uwrwturlml �i �� Q eY p mrmrmmuul 1 �a �i i Lt. � Y ��o' `�� l81lI IIIIIIICIiilllif�� �� � a �� ��•� �Ps;.,- \ �91lI IIIIIIIIIN11111t01 �' ; a„ �.. ! >`�Illllgllll{IIIII63�� a� � J r 1 'ti r o a► CI'Pl(OF hZANC1iU Cf3CAMQhiGA '-1�u.f(NHte Max 607 Raneho Cutapnmen,C'ado{e:la 9172A,rater gay-lesl Decepher 8, 1089 t% �1 Bruce M. Mafiner Creative Environs Architects jy 4382. Brooks Stmet Suite'A Montclair,'CA''91768 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REVIEW 89.105 Derr Mr, Meaner: Thar'►k you for submitting your proposal for the officefindustrial park or Arrow Highway betwwn the Devore freeway and Etiwarda Avenue. Please see the attached ;vents which are provided to. assist you in desig ing a superior proyee -in Rarxho Oucamonga. Should you have any Qesstions regarding this project or if I can be of t further assistance,'pieasd do not;hesitate to Call me at (714) 989-1861. Sincerely, COMMUNITY-DEVELOPMENT DEPA'ATMENT PLANNING DIVISION, Alt., Steve Ross Assistant Planner r!-' SR:mig 3— Attachments: •Fi£C�IdI; . €l E C 1 1989 Ctreattve Env3rnna C+.}.rilmemMR . Meyro. _ Williams).Aleuandef ` Charles 1.auduel 11 City x16110201 bennis L.Sim Deborah h',brown Pamela j.Wright jack Lim,AIC' i� PLIES DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY,REVIEW 89-105 UFFICEIINDUMIAI P K Planning Comments: 1. Proposed4use a. Ne-siteis within Subarea 8 of the Industrial Specific Plan, and is zoned for General Indrstrial use." Research and Development is a permitted use, however, Administrative and Office uses will require a 'Conditional Use Permit:. 2. Site plan: ® a. ISO site is W- thin ti 't w.. .. 2&r+e. f+ y ta_�ps;_: Circulation EJerAstrt,., i' , Tharefo re, ara nr i'xtensive t�°`��.,ie'�itasis av�'El lle re�u:ire�: �e`bnclosed b. The proposed plan appears to be an offici�a uark,, but the addition of roll-up doors makes it look indu�ir ral. if a combination is proposed, the two uses should be\,,made to function together in a sensible manner. For instance, having ' a beautiful, 'landscape plaza next to roll7up doors is a conflict which should be.,eliminated. If roll-up doors'wiii be part of the project,` they should be relocated to the<alley ® between the buij1dings where they will be screened. Tricks should not be ao essing the loading area by way of the plaza, although, the, souti5 side of the site does not make a great access .ither. >v, C. 'there shoulG>be more of a connection between the plaza and the ., ® north side of Buildings 2 and 3. This would have a secondary; entraxe on the north side of the buildings. In addition, enhanced paving materials, such as interlocking concrete pavers, should run between the plaza and the buildings. The loading area between the buildings should;be screened from public view. Truck: access should probabl ✓not be allowed at ® this part of the site. d. The overall circulation.'of the site should be simplified. Trucks don't have any clear and easy acswess to the loading area. Autcmabile access seems adequate, although it Jocks confusing._ PLIES DEVELOPMENT Page 31Q5 Engineering Comments: ® 1. All applicable conditions of approval for Tentative Parcel Map '9326 will be repeated for design review on the site. Satisfaction of the conditions by others will render any d plicated conditions void upon their completion and acceptance by the City. These will include: i a. Ih-lieu gees for utilities undergrounding on Arrow Route; b. Constructior, of the master plan storm drain within Arrow Rou to c. Design and construction of an interim retention basin if ® building permits are issued prior to completion of Day Creek Channel improvements south of Arrow Route; :,and - d. Dedication of all applicable easements. 2. An amendme.nt to the=Tentatide Paf.el Map shall .be processed with the design review to allow°confnation of Lots 13 with 14, 15 with 16, and 27 with 28. If Joint use driveway locations c e to be �. revised, than the conceptual, master plan will require revision as wall.' 3. The curves within Commerce Parkway East' and Best shall begin a ® minircum of 100 feet north' of the Arrow Route curb returns. The reversing curves shall have the, same radius (3QQ-feet minimum) and be separated by 10D feet :of' tzngent. Refer to Special Condition No. 8 of Parcel Map 9326y 4. Enhanced pavement within :tie`public right-of-way shall be designedc, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: interlocking pavers of ® high strength concrete. 5. There is no median on. Arrow Route. 6. Driveways street on Ne Commerce b Parkway East 'and West shall align�eross the y (Ste•:attaached Q0r1vewa7 Policy it. ® Driveways shall be ,perpendicular to the street (radi-':�' on curves) c!id avoid the inside of curves. 7. Snow lines of sight for all :intersections and project,driveways on the landscape and `grading, plans per attached draft Standard No. 413. S. Adjacent structures and pavement to the east shall be shown on the site and grading plans 1 tx PU DEVELOPMENT 89-105 Pig a 2 , { ` e. The two entrances north of Building 2 on Cbmverce°Parkway East should be combined into a main entrance for the project with reciprocal access fnr the property to the' north' 016ng the property line. A similar entrance should be provided on Con,ierce park;"day, test.; f. No median island IS planned for. ,Arrow H'iYht ay. g. Parking stall dimensions ate 91 x 18' witt; a one foot overhang ® allowed for standard sp&es..,--, Compact spaces are 81 x 161, with no overhang alloyed. C, 3. Architecture: a. The architecture is interesting. It ineorporati-s;reflectivrfr glass, fluted concrete panels; and actent reveals. Thee& seems to- be quite a bit of texture and sha?Qw lines. I feel that ,.10e variety of materials and textures '64y be, along the„ lines of what the Planning Commission' is looking for. s However:; additional attention to the elevations is needed, su`h as more clearly defining the building entries. 4. Landscaping: a. The landscaQirck.plan appears to be,'adequate,:but a table will be required to summarize compliance with the following ` requirements: One (1) tree per three parking stalls One (1) tree per 30 linear feet--,of property boundary. One R) tree per_30 linear feet of building frontage One (t) ,lee per' 2O linear feet of street frontage A min"saum of 12% of the net lot area is required to be' ® landscaped:. 5. Submittal reqMrements: Be sure to comply with the atia6id Submittal Requirements. The project site :and its part of tt;e master plan proposal 'should be xell defined. Buildings adjacent: to the site of future phases should be shaded or shown with clear indications that they art not a part of the'proposed project. c; r 41 PLIES DEVELOPMENT PR 89-105 Page 4 lid l 9. _ t` Provide cross er>tions for, the .north. project bot::ddry on the - grading plan. Extend Section D-D through ;the existing pavement on the property to the,iaast. . Building and Safety Comments: 1. Al i plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no lan;7n,then 2411 r x 361" Exception: 30" x 42" acceptable for preliminary)► 2. future, building and phases shown on site plan should be 9hostied in for elevation match up oh'"ing plan. 3. &rad5'e:3 plan does not conform with,requirements. ll li t? J , 1 , If e� C: ti;'a ��_ �r t • t ., d 1 • t, t . ��� 1 UiLwiuir F NT',4 A STEAL s l.+ •e.� 4�. , <-,� ��. 'fin CD loo ON OD, ok—)6't Afy m Co io n I� !o J .-I RESOLUTION NO, 89-010 A 'ABSOLUTION Zr THE>CITX,,COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONOA, CALIFORNI;;r APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL• ASSESSHr`T AND FOOTH4LL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN kMENDHENT '89-01r REQI1ESTING TO MODIFY THE REGIONAL ABLATED COHHERCIAL LAND i;ZE'OPTION FROM APNi 229-`021-59 AND 229-031-151 AND SHOW ACCESS POINT'S FOf,:THS BLOCK BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AN TH$ NORTK,'aRROW ROUTE ON THE SOUTH, I-15° FREEWAY ON THE: WEST, AND ExIWANDA AVENUE ON THE EAST, NECESSITATED BY A PROPOSED H"Pf-,ER GENERATINrr PLANNT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RTIWA!nA AVENUE AND AR16W'ROUTE IN RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA The City Cou(icil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dc2a hcraby resolve as followss A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application 'or Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 49-01 as described in the t1�tle of his Resolution. Her,Pinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill. Boulevard ' Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application", (Li) on 25th of January, 1969, the Planning Commission of,the City I aF Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application; i Field (iii) On the l5th of February, 1989r-the C;:ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted r Uly noticed p41lic hearing, concluded said hearing on that date; and heard and consid---id the Planning Commission recommendation of apgroval; and (iv) All regal presegnisi as to the Ad cpti of_ this Reso' Ion i have occurred. - B. $Badlvtion. Now, THEREFORE, the City council of the City of RanchO_Cucamanga does hereby find, detagmLne and resolve as follows: 1. This counci:,hereby specifically finds that all, of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Pint W, of this Resolution ass true and cosset. 2. Based upon substantial aviden_a presentod to this Council during �o above-referenced public hearings including written and oral staff reports, th.:_`Council hereby apaaifical.ly finds`as Sollo%is: (a) The proposed" }lD power generating plant 'it the northwest Corner of Arrow Route and Avenue necessitates mod gicrt&,ba of Chs,accuse ( provided the light Lnaustrial parcels on the 'southerly part of subare-\4 cf the Foothill Boulevard SpaciiLe Plan. Sinoa these par�als ale.) conteb,n i1 , Resolution No. 89-070 ^. ia, Page 2 a land use. option :to develop as regional related commercial, access options are vzl,�osed whLza are dependent on which land use de,relopa, as.Y shown on the attachod Exhibits A and B. (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated _regional Related Commercial usage. The property to_:the west in designated I-1S Freeway. The property to the east 1n designated community commercial and residential. The proporty to'� the south is designated General Industriall and 4c) Them application does not conflict with the Circulation policseo of the General Flan and will provide' for develcpmnt in. a manner consistent with the policies and goals'of the General Plan and iAth related dayslopmantj and (C) The application promote* the policies and gaols of the foothill Boulevard Specific Klan, 3. Based upon the sub lf�antial evidence presented to this CounZil during the above-referenced public htjring* and upon the .pacific findings) t factij not forth in paragraphs 1 and aahave, this council hereby finds E/d conclude* as follows& (a) Tom application does not .conflLD4 with the Circulation no7licies of the Foothill boulevard Specific P1anl and (b) The application promotes the goals of the ftothi11 .Boulevard specific Plan. 4. This council hereby finds a: certifies that the application ha--. boon reviewed' and considered in, compliance" with the California!; _14vironmental Quality Act of-1970 and adopts a Negative asclr';c):ion. e Based up on pan the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3i and 4 above, the City Council of the City of -Rancho Cucamonga, ' California, on the ISth day of February, 1989y hereby approves roothill Boulevard specific Plan Amendment'89-01. S. BEST rMTHER RESOrMM that the City 'Clerk ie hereby authorised _ and 13rected to advertise as required by Ivy. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this lit day of March, 1989. AyEst Alexanderr,_Brown auquat, stout, Wright No&at None ABSENTt 'None k ® _ •.. ,y . Dennis L. stout,. Mayor Resolution No:85g-wo Pae 3 ATTESTe (� :39verly A -Authelet, City Clerk 1, 13WERLY �UTHELET, CITX CLERK of"whe City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby cartify.that the voregoing Revolution was duly`rassed, approved, and adopted by the Q-,i:y council of.t'W City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regiz),a r meeting of caid City, ouncii held on the' let day of March, 1989. isxaeuted thin and,day of March, 1,!I89 a.-- Rancho-Cucamonga, Califc`.;nia. C' A C TIO Paverly . Authelet, City Clark CID �\ 17 1 5 Drive .. :Acoidiubrvu bYi� Page 4 . y r Vim- ' (fie .tee LU-. CL CL P v � ® CIE S Lj 14V- S _ e ti w � ' WA 'Q Im a vi 4t New PARe IV- ,1 0 J CET OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT .DATE; t TO: Chairman and 3--mb+rs of the ten ", ,in Cowssion FROM: f�illta; J, �'.lva. Deputy City Engineer BY: Chuck Kackey, Assaciate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS i rf AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLdtt AMLNOt h ,. '® - request street c rCU at jL-ttern m subarea`S; located north of Arrow Route, t between",the Y-I,S,freAK�v and Etiwanda Avasnue, necessitated III by a proposed HWD power plant ab tha.::,®rt�w*5�t comer 6? Etiranda Avenue and Arrow Route.. �P.. ENVIROtf4ENTAL ASSESS E"k `k'W FOOTHILL 00ULEVARD SPECIFXC PLAN � 59-01 - CITY - reques ats y e_ ona -Relaxed., rc a an CSL option from. APN, 22 021-59 and 229-0914% And show access points' for the block- bounded by Foothill Boulevard' W the north, Arra)w Route on the south, 1-15 3reeway On, the west, and Etiwa:nda Avenue on the east, necessitated by a praa.C; ;?ibtD power generating plant at the northwest corner of EtIWI.da aid Arrow, i I. ABSTRACT: r® These app!icatiOnS ,reque!,t aaendis nt to tte Industrial Specific rtan LISP) and tki the Foothill Boulevard Spe':ifi: Plan (FSP) to change the proposed local i3c;usV141 Street .Ayste,i of subares 9 Af the ISP avid propose acces:j optle4s for .various FSY light industrial parse% .,;::th contain n land use 6ptiion for regTo,:-,�i relate: comerefal usage. This, actft) will serve to mii,igate the access g4estions for this area cagsed by .the proposed power generating �jiant at the northwest corner of E*� :uos Aveaue on9 Arrow Poute and is r mmendeii by staff. 10CAT3o#: The application SlU is located in the vicinity of FontPtill Daulevard, I�15 Freeway, Etilwanda. Avenge, and Arrow Route Nme Figure A?. North - Regional Relaterd Cou*rciai ana� nfty Com*rcial South - HeaV Ineustrial East - Coeninity C rciag and Res identia' , Vest - 1-16-Freeway r , ITEMS 0,P PLANIdlon comissiDm �TAF'F 'Kpdw ISP n4l FSP•89-01 = CITY OF AAKHO CUCAwKA ' JANUARY 25, 1989: PAGE 2 IdF, E :CKGROUND: .ere decision by the Metropolitan Water DlstrfCt (MWD) to build a power Cute plant at the northwest corner of jilwanda Avenue and Arrow Route has necessitated the re-study'of the ISP and the'FSP between I-15 and Etiwanda Avenue sod Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Routj. The ultimate NWD area will extend northerly approximately 200D fret from' f Arrow Route arM westerly approximately 2000 feet from Etiwandd Avenue, as �_ on Figure 0 In the FSP, the WdD project will occupy land designated :as light industrial (L1) use ; The proposed local street Systm rust t4 changed to a,cwmdz .: the AWD pproject. This local,' greet systei is shown or the ISP gap for subarea 8 (Figure M',, Shows;`was a ,proposed east-west- street, Devon and an unnamed proposed street: frog Arrow Rou-e to Devo,, extending through the proposed No project. Due to the :inure of the Project, these proposed etreets� cannot be constructed, The proposed street, Devon, ran along the south boun�Sary of the 'FSP and north boundary of the FSP, thereby-'providing access to tAI'x planned tedustr si ` use areas. Therefore, the proposed lace, street system nee to lee reastudird,. ''_ The eytisting 'and proposed land uses fir :the stuffy area are shown on Figure B. Access to the Regional Related Coaai+;;w'al (RRC) land use is provided by foothill. Boulevard which i_=consisda,t with the,FSP. WD can be provider access from Etiwanda Averup ,`and Arrow Route via driveways. The ches:ical plant at 12550 ArroUt*jute.has drivew V access, Irom,Arrow Route. Parcel 22902159 (proposed Plies Project) fronts Arrow` Q. Rr for access. wtr, this 49 a pep percet extending north to the ` '_� FBcwe t�15 right-of-w�Y with tan! area in-.both the ISP God FSP,. The proposed street, ken.ey. ens shosa�r ors the ISM subcrea >i esp extending ti;n Arrow 2ovite to De on providing access this parcel.' Parcel 2290312S and •4 hest half of parcel i2903115 lose access to Et1wands Avenue by ellmfns.*ing DeV§n eastarly through the Y#M ';project and to Arrow Route when Devon, to the.' west of the XWD p'r6jdct, is (. eliminated. The:i arcel3 are zoned LI in t?* FSP. TW Fir`indicated that 90111, and tM mrth ftion o,1 panel 22 r po ree 902 9 tr I.r (proposed P41@s 9c1t-6tends earth rat the IS(% into.the _ fop I NI'Aut-commerctel'uses star pd. d4 The proposed Pitts project shows industrial uses only. IV. ANALYSIS: A. dosed Change to the�Futur Lcrcat Street 5yste� yl In ft condition before t?* MID project, tfft'.r'° �t�i1 uses: on the southerly part of the FS+P>and on the ncrW. , part oti• the ISP j received access by td* proporrf Devon Street. is PLANNING Cmssiou STAFF REPORT 1; . ISP 8941. FSP_89-01 =CITY OF :RAPh�F� t►JCAMONGA PANEAR 25, 1989 . In the after condition, only the western Ll parcels need access,The access question is made coaplez by the fact that Vneil LI contain an option for RE pr, �Ster IF this LI is develo ed es Rid, then acc 4auld6je venue. IF: the rre s are, the aSC@yy SP4Qu .; y rniW route through a T*l industrial street system. In', other cords,: rovirlad'these FSP dove - reels ant on Cfiether t,�ey or LI. en tie a of aeaegs _ ® In any 'I&se,.Henley and the westerly part of Devon,,pust $e replacea� by a suitable local industrial street system. lriis, new streeti; system rust meet the 1lnwin9 criteria: 1) It cannot teminate in,a cul-de-sac longer than 604 fe±t. 2) It shall provide adequate Access to parcel 22002453+ proposed P1 ies Project). Since parcel 22902159 averages 18W t feel in depth, a loop street System approxtrately 1200 feet in depth is ,proposed, as shove f� Figure D. i if parcels< <>903116 and 22903116, develop.LI in�^be FSP, then access ^ :hall be ob, fined from the ISO'circulation System,,1tC the fors of an attached eu_.=de-sac, serving these:parcels, as show an Fi ire'E. This proppaced cul-de-ssc should r up the west property tine Of parcel 229p3l26. The estimated traffic volumes for" parcels 12902159, 2290315 ,and 2290316 assminq l 0t induste-al use are: .' YPD;� PM Peak AM'Peak Peak Hr. Peak Hr. Parcel ,f Acres _ AC VOWC { Wif YPD (YPH� (YPH) " 22902159 37;8 Sa.B 7.4 ` - 7.7 1968 2 1 203 22903115 10.0 SIX 7.4 7..7 518 74 77 22903116 S.0 51.8 7.4 7.7 259 37 39 _ (best half) TOTAL 275 3$2 !�L AtflIMA"a tomiss10M STAFF REFORT,� < ISP 89-01; FSP 89-01 - CITY OF RARCM CUCAh NGA JANUARY The proposed ISD local str"teet i,yst�can readily handle dais valuie Of traffic.` -The level of service c1iil be very good. If parcel 22903115 and/or the n+fr3y part of parcel' 222164 develop,, as RM., then access sl'�Il be 4btaineM from :tha FSP circuiatian systeo in the'foa^ ,f�prlvate streets and drivew4, by . `-=es9 from Foo:�hill Saule4ard,and Etiwanda.))venue. The 'FSP, subarea .4 circu;`atldn concept elan shows a major drivewoY,y access and median openfyg to the concept -plan land on Foothill Boulevard a&.4t half way between Afiianda Avenue and;'the 1-15,Freeway While _ other dr eways�could be. instaned rlong Foothill Soul eaardy the, Nid 7ocati�n would be .the,War P)cus for developing an adeequate.' I fnternatsirutationsb�,teae "W land"Use. parcels 2c_'03115 and/or, the"iorthte ly 4art of '22902159 devet�:p� ° 1(s RRC, 'adequate acc d 1 awbilable because t® ievelop''j alas r plan as U e'part, V, 4. + nrfid-'sue-a a' Jr tenF..eS s�i�j► and planning for adequate sircuY,etio&., r, , Additionallyy, P,4ND is pYdanir,.g> to 1 reserve 'an access easement to, parcel. 2290311, that rrosse-i�_"e WD profec6 et its northerly,:, boundary from thts parcel east tQltlwanda.Avenue� IF thfs partet, ' develops LI, adequate p bYic strse�`access 14a3 bean pfianned to thls Parcel which ia-the pr,46sed street steea to Arroi Route. YF this :.parcel develops RRC, t&n this drivaw y''on €giwanda` cxa be used to cccess all of the .ARC Und,,'Ancluding garQPl .229031A§ - 3riveway should be icais Ignited.Jilnt-usage for RRC and WD projects.. ® to insure adaquate drier r spac4ng along a i h adequa4� feces= .a Etiwanda avenue /i The aptiaraaaYaccess for eland use,option is' shoyn� n Figure F. B. Proaosed Changes Therefore the following change's"and opttP;s are rec$e ended: ,t 4SN I. IIelete Eh Von, Wee land the,`unnawd proposed street;fr o; the ISP, subarea 9. 2. laid the proposed local ;loop street systM nOrth'of Arrow Route as discussed,, shown oat Figure.,D. F- PLANNING COMMISS1ON STAFF fd:PART if - ,, ISP 89-01 FSP 99-0" CITY t` RFJdCi80'Ct�AJMOFI } I( JRANU 5 25. 069 a Yap and FSP: Option a) If parcels 22903/15 an 229031W located In the ' FSP deveicp, r.; LI usage, then' access shalt betaken from the pe6po�L.d ISP local loop street system in (2) above as cui-Je-Sa4 rnt -zo exceed W, feet as shown ,� on Figure - •• - ; Option b) If parcels Z2203115, 122903116 and/or the. northerly'- PP half of 22902159'iocatect in the FSP develop as RRC° visage, then access shaW be taken frog the prpposed FStV accesses cProvided aloiiiq FcnthilB Bosaleve�d and Etikanda Avenue as shown- cnf;Figurst ;= Additionally, if the north part of parcel iP902a39 deval®ps as the RRC praiest $hail be designed 1� etto6� o011y� service vehicles access g the ISP;`laap StreE?�1$. The intent of Options a and h ig� tQ. anSure that RRC atc ss s�� i obtained: from Foothill Boelevard and Etfwanda A�venpa and at LI access t3 obtained from' Ar'FOW Route via 'the .loop' s>trset. Zf parcels develop different _,sand -roses, their, access wi11 be determined by„the, tY!'e 6f land`use d veloped,'as defined above. �. ENVIROiMENTAL: In conjunction with `the application, - an Initial Study/Prellainar Environmental Assess nt, in confor4ity with the requirements:of the California Eryft-:;dental Quality Act has been prepared and 2hW �ropasml would — 7signifieant adverse effsst a� the envi► ±e+t .. Therefore, the,'r annino towfs.s on any_ make a finding of too signifficant fact on th'e environment and-recoatie.;d certification of a Negative Declaration. VI. FACTS FOR FINOYNGS: s) The aeend�ent does ei@t conflict sai$a�l the eirculatkoraolicie$ of a e � Industrial -es Spec ill Spec! jfic Plan or of the.Foothffic b) Tt* amendaa:nt ormtes the gams of t`1se, ?ndustrial Aver ,.SCi�rifie; Plan and of tl*Foothiil Boulevard Specific Plan,, and A c) The awendvaent ;"ld not be Werislly' injurious or detrimental to the mdjacent Propsrties +1 PLANNING.COMISSION STAFF REPORT ISP 89-01; FSP 89-01 - CITY(f RwNCHD Ct1CAMM " c ' PANDA 25' ,%g ' V11. 'RECOMMENDATION: Staff reto riw public hearing dfscussiori of the roposed,.Industrial Area soacifiC 'titan and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Awifdmint. If the panning CO�aission.agrees crith.IM above Analysis,and Facts for Finding,.,°the. Planning Cowission should Qdopt the attached resolutf4 j in support„af the as nda�ent to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and amend�ni* Et; the,Foothill Boulevard Specific.plan. Respectfuilji submitted:, <1 William J. Silvai)P.E, Deputy City Engineer. RHM:CM:sd i Attachments: Figure A - Vicinity Kdp Rgure D - Proposed and Existing Land Use Figure C - ISP Sub'4rea & , Fiauro 0 - Proposed Street System for ISP. FiureE - Proposed Access Option for. Parcels Z29r?3i15 I, and 22903115 if developed,as Light Industrial Figisre;F - Pr®Poaed Access Option 'fc Parcels 22903116, 22903116 end NortherIO Part of.229-2159 if �- developed as Regional'PW A, 'CowmerciaY r - 0 � �� It t • + - � i1 0 11 •! a cc Via• t� ci "j :3nr.aa113x2 it }1 i yttl •� fl, t cc I VR III L VCNVM143 Z t 1783YJ, Ira g 5 1 .® 13Ar Y31S3n0tz 0Y ® j 111Alie 1 C _ 1F �•�/ \. 11 ql :cam czi.u' 1 � C!g�¢ �a.•i. 2 s W Y H 6T p 1.3Ar x3ArN �1!SOxY3tx 1 • NAM Ic. •>R 1� .r iN3nand":� .� .� iQ ® � � a,v/•.. .. ! o a .`3AI Q'f_761N7Yr c� i 11 La xp ll .3A► prSt173N ,Q �g V q .19 l! p R t 11 m e sa 23 KIP".T3NYl7 �• r^a0xr�nJ i3Ar ON INIA $ ¢ s All N P r :.t a .•% o 1: �, elms p ro d, °� i1 ee AM3Ar p97ni . r ° uj fit} d��ffi�E�A i®also � 7 miq ®� ® ®o s U o Bill 4 ® �st Z. • B `e®o @4$'P ,Wno i e®o UJI 4. ®sB�sai, `ssaso®sa�r�n�s®..... LU cc AP �w` ��a1CC7G iq _a I�TimIlk r AT Ny , y7 pYM . u� 1 � • moo `— Xv �► o 0 'n$ R I ®� 131 lu I 0 �I v 13 El 01 OA ... p. 1� rs®w�rsrsaro�arrs�rr�oe•r l 0 +13' r 13 °i : '►� I 0 A 13 g - � "rrir`rII tsf'ssriu orw►aoorcc---- --rrsc of eta v UJ UJ o !X .� � 'P Y• 13 +�a8 w + n ® ss�►iiooJFJ►.r�.i►.r,-.rB�',asB`aa �-dersYils`�:t�-r•.tY.Y�-� •1�_ t1 �yootaaoaom� 01 Lu Ll13 �I LL 136 II oe l � I.. De 7 f( tie � U c �� p !Els fl� d a: ti �i �. � �9'BN.i�.1►�: FIL'BBBdB®N.TdOlBldd�'B.CM.CBi�Ad' , Ir U. to RIF LU s Ro Q u C 0.la �+ o tat O LL Lu CC. His ■e 1 ° 1 • ! I • • ��1r`r��rq F:o I ,® i®��' f�,/�iry p aar®®r®rrrrT®®Esrorrroav� `Y LL co X � M v1 . / ■ l ° oc cm ��►�, ■• ■e � .� . sA 1.pM16 cc': 991C AE P p C: go o ) RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CatiaSION OF THE CITY OF: ENVIRONMENT AS Efr4t TTIFORWI AND IN,DUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC LAN AMENDMEmT 89-01, REQUESTING;TO NDDIFY THF­LOCAL STREET CIRCULATION PATTERN WITHIN SUBAREA 8, LOCATED NORr4 OF ARROW ROUTE, BETWEEN THE 1-15 FREEWAY AND ETIN.ANDA AVENUE, HECE5!47ATED BY A PRDPOSED MWD POWER GENERATING PLANT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANOA AVENUE AND ARROW ROOT IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ® A. _Recitals. { (I) The City of Rancho Cuc("°,n a has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan AmendmentHa. 89-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution. the sub act Industrial Aria Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as ®the application. ® fit) On January 25. 1989, the Planning Cow47%1c4 of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing gm-,i -t%e application. (III) All legal prerequisites to the adoptio of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW. THEREFORE. it is hereby found, deterain%,: ` and rnxolved by the Planning Comission-of the City of Rancho'Cucamonga as follms: I. TK;-,Co iss'on hereby specifically finds that all of ;tie fscts set forth in the Recitals. Part °A , of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this fission during, the, above-referenced public hearing an January 25. 1989,",Including written and oral staff reports, together with public testiiagw, this ® Commission hereby specifically fine:; as follows: a) The propOssd MWO power' generating plant at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenus necessitates modification of the proposed local industrial street system. Therefore, public access requiMents necessitate the modification of said local system as shown on the attached figures. b) The property north of the subject site 40 designated LI ht Industrial With an optional Regional dilated Comereial usage., The - property to the west is the I-15 FreewAy. The property to the cast' Is designated Comnity Cmercial 4iii'Dlesidential. The property,to the south is designated He&VY Co**rciai'I tnd 4 PlAi YN5, C ISS16r R- 10t iq; ISP e9-01 CM OF RAWHO CUCAWM , PANEJANUAR ZY 24-, 1989' !,J _•• rs c) This awndoent does riot conflict with the Land >se Vzlicies Of the General Plan and will provide, for development-, ;rtthin the distr±rt, in a W4 fner nsi$e"t"with the Cfeneral 41� 4 the related develo ato and..�� f d) This amendment does promote the goals and ob�ecYives of t1 Industrial Area"Spacific plan. and, �n e) This amendment would not be materially injurious ® detrimental to the adjacent properties Od 'could not 'haii significant impact on the environment nor thi<sur Jun properties " and that a negative declaration be issued. 3„ Based upon the" su5s't,rAtial evidence presented to this`�:onaission during the above refer@aced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: 4) The amendment does not conflict with the-Circulation policies. of the Industrial,-Area Specific Plan; and b) The amendwnt proW,is tha goals of the Circulation Element Of the Industrial Aria Specific Plan, and r t) "That the proposed awndwnt is in conformance with the General Plan; and. d) The amendment world not be ma'�arially injurious or detrimental to thr adjkc nt properties. 4. This Commission hereby finds that UW-Project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Enviromental.Quaii3y 16Ct of 1970 and further this Commission 'recomends the Usuance of a 'Negative Declaration by the City Council. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragr4h I" ` 2, 3. and 4 above, this COmmissfon hereby resolves that pursuant to. tect+on 66860 to 65U5 of the California 0avernment Codo, that the Planning Coimissimn`' of the City of Rancho �'ucawnga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of, January, 1969, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amond�nt No. G9-01: v. ne ®,pony`Szsretary:�i=ra.9�-Cowission shall certify to the {\ adoption of this Resolution. t� VLANNING CMISSION we 4LUTION No. ISP 0-01 - CITY OF` rvCH0 .CUCQwM JJ NUUA3 6 25, 199 ; Q3 _ APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH UY OF JANUARY, 1969. PLANNING COMMISSTON OF THE CITY,'4r RAK%L CUCjWNGA arry T. McHvel,,Chairmati ATTEST: Brad Buller, acre ry. I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Cowission of the,.Cif of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify ,that the foregoing Resolution was duly and egularIV introduced,,passed, and adopted by the Planning Co ission`of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular Ming of the Planning Comissfon held on the 25th ZY of January, 1989, by the`fnlloa A"(Votemto-wit: AYES• COMISSIONERS•' >�} NOES COMRISSIONERS:' ' ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: r- I � r v zz W" q � Ivo p ` 04 y d�� }iy S 113 r- V 7' 13 ,� Sii:®®4r1Y6`OI®!a®9y®6ID\�.00pe.a� � R•• i r s lay ® 19Q %® A �13 r d® { _ . �11. 1 .Y�.��zffi��'.as�erx.��*.�a'.s��rrs�.��®ars%•j.��t ct c�Q�7 m�®�t�lCi j d 'riwA e 1 s � .� a, m 43 a ® Q r Rr Al e®o ti 3 ti RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CoWiSsION OF THE CITY OF RAFYHO COCA MGA, CALIFO;?YIA, -RECONMENDIra'-APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENTAN6 FOOTHILL BOAEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT.89-01, REQUESTING TO=. IFY THE REGICNAL RELATED COMMERCIAL LAND USE"OPTION FROM APO: 229.021-59 AND 229-031-15, AND SHON ACCESS POINTS FOR THE!1M GOUHDED BY FOOTHILL BOULEVAm--bR THE NORTH, AM ROUTE ON THE SOUTH, 1-15 FREEWAY ON THE WEST, AND ETIWANOA AVENUE ON YHE EAST; NECESSITATED BY A PROPOSED 14WD POWER GENERATING PLANT AT TOE XORThWEST CORNER OF ETINANDA AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE IN RANCHO CUCAMOW, .CALIFORNIA, i AND MAKING FINDINGS 14 SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cusasmnga has filed an ~iPplieatian for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Aasendrmnt No. 89-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as 'the,application'. On January 25. 1999, the P1annfn9 CoMission of the City of Rancho Cucaoonga conducted a ou.'ly noticed 'Public hearin Lon the application. �0 (fit) A11 legal ,,irerequisftes to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. f, B. Resolution. i NOW, THEREFORE it'°dS he rebj! fs and. deS mid and, resolve4 by the. dl Planning Comission of the City .CF-Aaancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, 'Part "A . of this Resolutfon are truce and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence„presented to this Coamission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 2S, 1989, including' smitten and oral staff reports, together with public testimy, this Camission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The proposed XWD power generating plant at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue necessitates modification 1 di of the access provided the tight industrial parcels on the southerly part of subarea 4 of the,Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Since these parcels also contain a lard use option to develop as regional related comercial, access options are proposed which art dependent on which land use thvelops, ss-shosn on tN attached figures�-.mW _ r t PLANNING - NO. ON FSP 89 01 - CITYIOF RESOLUTION OF CUCAMONGW JANUARY 2s, 1989 PAGE 2 b) Tha*property north of the subject site is designated RegioVral Related Commercial usage. The property to the test is designated the 1-15 Freeway. The property to the east is designated Community Commercial and Residential. The property to the south is designated General Industrial; and c) This amendment does not conflict with the land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development. within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment doss promote the goals and objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjscent ,properties and .would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a negative declaration be iss►wd. ® 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission �) during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Omission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) The anen,*ent does nat conflict with the Circulation poliyies ® of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Pram and 0 That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the ® General' Plan; and d) The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This C15mission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed ® and considered for coopliance with the California Environmsentai Quality Act of 1970 and further this C000ission- recommends the issuance of a negative Declaration by the City Council: 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this COMIssion hareby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of th@ California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the Cigy of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of January, 1§�9, Foothill Boulevard Wfir Plan Amer aunt Mg. 69-01. :ad®pti®n 6. r %t Ote�sol y Secretary tO this Coammission shad oeertify to the _ 6��20 PLANNING COWISSION RESO@.ilT%00! NO w JAW 3 259 1989, - APPROVED AM ADOPTED THIS"25TH DAY OF Jf+wRY 1989, PLANNING COMISSION 'OF:-'THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry T. Mckiel, a�rssan ATTEST: Brad BulTer. secretary r1 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Coawission Of the City of Rbn4h"O CuCIMonga, da hereby�-certlfy that the 'foregoing Resolution was ally and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning COMISSion of: the MY of Rcncho Cucamonga, at a regular meting off>the Planning Csmissior,'held on the 25th day of Januar 198 y, 9 by the folloainq votta-to-x14a AYES: CO?l9ISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: _ dt m, , • a �� � • ' 7seoVvn.flR, t UA @� Cc ®6 � e A c ey 9 F B o I U ®o°O a a ° I 7®o s L De ® Re ►� v r ® ®o t a(]s ifie ;.e90 J®$, � OnE ® ®sfle Q e 13: so ��rrsore.^v®`osr •�-serd;e orm r� a 0 cm a h ►H� ®� 1 it _Q a� uj ®� ° � ► s% can W o Q LJ UJ cc IL 96. 4.LU mull IE7t�y ®o • Ice U. ®! of ®; Q s: ® k !° me ago ° Y®• ICI 7®® I me cc U. P a g d @� r -® r ®g �® Mcmcm cm! � oon ® ; ® . �' CL _ '® i� CITY OF BANCHO)CRTAhIONGA STAFF R1C.1'i0RT 0 DATE: June 26, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner PY: Scott Murphyp,Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-04 - THE WATTSON COMPANY - A request to modify the median teak location on Foothill Boulevard, to add a-median` break location on Foothill Boulevard, and to change the land use designation from Light Industrial to Regional Related Commercial for an area of approximately 26 acres within the Foothill r Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4), located on tbo'east side of p. Interstate 15, south of Foothill Boulevard. These requests are � ,yl in conjunction with the development of a t60 acre i 3Qdr`!n retail/comuercial center located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between I-15 and ,Etiwanda Avenue APWz 229-031-03 through 13, ,15, 16„ and 20. Staff recommends issuance of :a Negative Declaration. F,4r`sted Files: Conditional Use Permit 90-37 and Tentative Parcel hap 13724. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERKXT 90-37 --TEE WATTSON COMPANY - A request for raster plan approval of a t60 acre retail/commercial center contaiainr= �pproXimately. 550,-000 square feet of leavable space and a ,re st.:fcr approval of conceptual site plan and building elevations for the Price Club facility in the LRegional Related Commercial and Light Industrial designations of the Foothill Boulevard Specific'Plan (Subarea 4), located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between: Interstate 1S and Etrranda Avenue -APE: ;229-031-03 through 13, 15, 16, and 20. Staff recomends issuance ,of a Negative Doclaratio lated Files: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; ArAndsea- 90-04 and Tentative Parcel lisp 13724., Associated with the proic ee Removal Permit 91-24. Y. PROJECT AND SITE DRSCRYPTIONr A. Action RoQuested: Approval' of a conceptual !lasts Plan, and a specific Site Plan and Building Elevations- for the Price C1uh: facility,_ issuance of a mitigated.; Negative Declarat oii for Conditional Use Permit 90-37, And recemae"tion of approval to the City Council for Environment..` and Foothill. Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-04. 1' ITEMS J 6 K, ci PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 THE-WATTSON COMPANY } June 26, 1991 J Page 2 B. Surroundinga`n,;Use and Zoning: North - Mixed use; Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea'4 - Regif ial Related Commercial and Community Commercial) South Water transmission facility,,-industrial plant and vacant, Industrial,Specific-Plan (Subarea.8 General'Industrial) East - Vacant and Single..Family.Residentials Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4 Community Commercial) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Interstate 15 and vacanti Victoria Planned Community (Regional Related Commercial) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site Commercial and Industrial Park North Commercial South - General Industrial East - Commercial, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West Comme��.cial D. Sii4 Characteristics:: The site contains several unique elements indicative of the Etiwanda area and the Route 66 Corridor duriii4 the 1910s'through the 1960s. The site was the host of the'Cucamonga Top Winery and contains- the remains of the win4r7 complex, with, it grape crusher, cistern, loading dock, accessory buildings, Craftay`;i home occupied by the winery own,`7 (the Guideras,, and a_small store used for selling wine. A second Craftsman-style residence is j located to the east of the Cucamonga Top Winery complex and was owned by another wine-making family (the DiCarlos) of the area. The eastern-most structure on the site is an old gas station which contained restaurant space as paiit.`of the'. service:operation. The gas station has -since been :converted to �a bodyshog. Also " characteristic of the Route 66 Corridor, approximately two-thirds of the street frontage along Foothill Boulevard contains, a double row • of Eucalyptus trees. The balance of the site contains grape vineyards and is undeveloped. E. Parking Calculations: "Number of Number of 1( Type square Parking spaces Spaces of Use rootage Ratio Favired Provided Price Club 121,325 1/220 506 821 Wal-Mart 155,584 1/220 707 BOB (ultimate) Gas Station 3, 5 Restaurant 6,000 1/100 0:,-' 60 6.000 1/5S 109i1 109 Fast Food 10,174 1/7S 136 ry 147 Retail ` 282,894 1/220 1,286 1,291 2,807, i 3,241 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPO.*:�' CUP 90-37 THE 'WATTSON COMP Y June 26, 1991 Page 3 IL ?SNALYSISY.,.'. A.. Master Plane The applicant is proposing to develop a 160 acre retail/commercial center consisting of approximately 520,000 square, feet of retail space, 22,000 square,.feet of restaurant/fa•st food use, and a service station. The cenEir is proposed to be anchored by a Price Club and a Wal-Mart. At this preliminary stage, the far western portion of the site is planned for four major tenants ranging in size from. 17,500 square' feet to 22,000 square feet, 20,000 square feet of shop space for smaller ucgrs, a 6,150 square foot retail pad, and a 12,000 square foot restaurant pad. The far eastern portion of the site contains a" 50,000 square foot supermarket and three major tenants, rangiXig in size from 22,000 to j 26,000 square feet, and 1-37,3.1�0 square rest of shop space. In addition, three retail pads, 'SrgY drive-thru'pads, and a service station are proposed along the Foothill Boulevard street frontage. The Master .Plan depicts basic building, parking, and circulation aisle locations within the project. S ecific des for each building, or series of buildings (except Club). will be subject to separate Development Review or Conditional Use Permit applications (as required by the Foothill Boulevard :Specific Plan). Ravedc71$' ag"3 COAV%reatioA WUA flea applicant, sr�stanLierl. rf. allY tho Western r.bma "�'Es. These changes will br`rya ai ' EeiSDYYCaCI0P1�; PRtC iritAia a B. Price Club: The applicant has submitted a site plan and building elevations for a 111,325 square foot Price Club facility. The building is proposed as a free-standing structure on a 12.2 acme parcel, generally located in the central portion of the project.. The northeast corner of the building will be devoted to the sale and, ,` installation of tires. ' The —Enna erovided ¢or"'the +ce Club 3s ` Just under one and one-half times the Code requiramsnt. Additional parking is based on the Price' C s' experience and needs of existing facilitiou in 'o dsr to accommodate the influx of customers especially at peak times (Christmas). C. Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendmantr 1. Median break location: With the development of the center, the applicant will be constructing a signalized intersection midway between Etiwanda Avenue and the Interstate 15 Freeway. The / o however, has been shifted a proximately 20 seMto th east o e locatio oothiluS c Plan. This proposed location a selected, no on y so Z bvide accesa to the subject site, but also to line ., up with'ihe existing driveway for the church on the north side Of Foothill Boulevard. -Additionally, the applicant: had prepared a conceptual master plan and traffic analysis to evaluate th ' `` X3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-3a - THE WATTSON COMPANY June; 26,'1991 Page 4, r ation off the future Regional Related Commercial u e e (Wort side of Foothill Boulevard Based upon review of the information, the new location will be able to serve the future development. Letters have- also been sent to the existing property owners notifying them of the proposed change- in location. Comments have been received fr0,A the church expressing their agreement with the new location. 2. New Median Breaks As part of the development of the site, the applicant is 2roposing a left-turn-only median break between the freeway off-ramp and the main signalized intersection for the project. Because of the unusual configuration and depth of the southwest portion of the site, the applicant feels thst the left-turn msdP.r,' break is necessary to provide adequate circulation for the project. This issue was addressed in the traffic study prepzred for the site and has met concurrence with the City's Traffic 5ngineer.- Additionally, favorable comments have been received, from Caltrans for .the additional median break. 3. Changes in Zoning Designations Under the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the sctttarn and southwestern portions of the site were designated light industrial with the southwest portion of the site being considered for a Regional Related Commercial use through the submittal and approval of a master plan. With the submittal of- the master plan for the retail/commercial A center, the applicant is now requesting that t(le zoning designation be changed conslstent with their proposal. There is, however, a small area within the,project site that was not originally considered as a teatial Re Po gional Rxlatad Commercial use. The area in the approximate location of the Wal-Mart building is designated as Flight. Industrial. with the Big Three O Industries located to the south and the Metropolitan Water District facility located immediately to tha east, this area would remain an isolated Light Industrial pocket. in that the applicant has aubcitted a master plan shoving a commercial use of the entire area, staff fealu it is appropriate to consider a change in the zonitg from Light Industrial to Regional Related Cesarcial consistent with the baiance of the project. i D. De4iesn 7haviiv Committees- This project has been the subject o five' Planning Commission workshopb. The format of these workshops was set lip to review specific aspects o! the project. The first worksaop focused ox major site planning issues. The second workshop o provided. direction for the architecture of the canter and the Price Club facility. The third workshop considered revisions to the site pLii for the entire site and the architectural concept for the in line shops _"or the eastern and western ends of the projects (excluding the free-standing _buildings). The fourth workshnr- centered on the conceptual site plan and building elevations for t*.• Price Club and finally, the fifth Plannir_Y Commission worksh,•, c n�idered the overall master p an for the s e. PLANNING COKKISSIUN STAFF REPORT CUP 80-37 -THE WATSON COMPANY ; June 26, 1991 Page 5 1. Price Club: On May 161 1991, tlty Planning Commission considered the conceptual site plan and'building elev,,trans for the Price c,Iub' facility. At that time, the Commission recommended �'Ipproval of the plans subject to the elimination of the file rgof elements over, the main entry and 'providing a .flat roof design consistent with,-that shown for the "tire center, entry. The, plans for the Price Club have since been revised consistent with,the planning Commission's direction. \N 2. Master Plan: On Ju:ie 6, 1991, thela Pnnin Commission reviewed overal the Droje4 aiason recommended;;approval of the ro ect s ect o e ollow ug ' c a. The dssign of.Pad S was not ar�'eptable in that sufficient stacking distance was not provided for the fast food restaurant. The plan should be revised"to provide-a design that is feasible for development. b. The design of Majors 5-a 'and Shop G is. not acceptable. Variation should be provided in the building footprints, elevation fenestratt,9n, and :building heights with future submittals. c. The Commission notedthat, provisions, other than the two Fast-food-restaurants, were not made for rmmta I Nt users within the eastern portion of the sits'. If the applicant is proposing additional restaurant userse adjustments will have to be made in the square footage of the buildings to ensure adequate parking is.provided, as'ragu�ed by the Development Code. d. Site amenities'should be provided across the site Sin `the various elements of the project. A hierarchy of site amenities should be provided to physically and visually link elements across the site. ,The''primary mphasis' of this hierarchy should be along the north/south drive aisles. The exact elements and extent" a the amenities, should be revisued by the Planning Cosaissix)n. The hierarchy might include such slaia6ate 'as building fofEal points,' kiosks, trellises, seating areas/benches, color:d/textured walkways, signage, streaP furniture, and landscaping. l a. fine applicant` should submit architectural details and elements to be reviewed and approved :by the Planning Commission to establish an architectural 'vocabulary to be us.d as the basis for design of future bu li'ings within rho center. ;1 l PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 - THE WATTSON'COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 6 E. The,compact parking spaces provided by the applicant vere accei:able for the following reasons: 1) The compa,- parking within: the Wal-Mart area Was in addi n to those spaces required under the Development Code. Standard spaces have been provided to meet the `III Code requirement for parking stalls. , 2) Compact spaces provided for thi;,eaetern .portion of the site exceed current Code standards, 'they z v, the, same width as standard stalls (9 feet) and are 1 foo, longer than compact stalls' (17 feet versus 16 feet).\ under the Development Code, a S foot overhang' is permitted for standard stalls and the proposal would only result in, a 1 foot reduction of a standard stall. If, h+,wever, the applicant proposes.to alter or modify the design of the parking area in the eastern por4:ion'of the site, the standards in place at, tha time of the proposed revision must be complied wi..h. g. Pads along the '1-11; Cornider, hct%3. dasi 3n�� sensitive to the visibility from th tray - Buildings shooLd not be oriented with their backs to the freeway" and sufficient, architecturally designed, roof-mounted screening j should be provided. . E. Historic Preservation Commission: As -*d: under. the Site Characteristics section of the .staff repo" is project location contains the remains of a family owned ark "tee.winery iheA a: filling station characteristic of°•_the te2ft '-a he 1660s`. The %f complex represents a historic period, style, ar«, _iy of life which is becoming more and more rare is the City. Because of its historic signvficance, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the site for possible Local Landmark Designation. In considering the site, the Historic Preservation Commission felt that a Local Landmark Designation would not ba appropriate. This decision was based on the fact that the site has been significantly altere;, and destroyed to a point where recordendin4 Landmark D*sIgnatioa over owner objection was not.merited. The Historic Preservation commission > did$ however, leaf that the hist(-y of the area should bva in some way-cosencrated. As a result, t4e'Hiatoric Preservation Commission: recommended approval of the sits`-%s a point of'interest to the City , COncil subject to a series of mitigation measures. The City Cauncil subsequently apprcmed the Resolution wiw "the following mitigations, prki'�tct owner shall sponsor. a'City opproved. Oral History Pr6giam'"6.'! the pioneering/wine-making families of the subject area} ICI ® 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. REPORT CUP 90-37 - THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 7 2. The existing structures shall be. documented fully according to HABSJHAER standards by an architect approved by the City. 3. Project owners shall offer to donate the Guidera and DiCario hones over a period of 180 da;' ',, to persons demtpnst=sting ownership of land witYtin the Cit+ , ',Rancho CucSmonga suitable for such relocation. The pro`' -owners will pay for such _ relocation.. ''"`' 4. The applicant shall incorporate the familial and architectural past of the area into commissioned public art Integral to the architectural design of the project. This art 6hall,)portray southern Etiwanda's wine-making Fast in a realistic style and the applicant will 'submit no less than threw_�!-.zr -rtiv_es, in no less than three different artistic xpdiums,`,rcr the-'aiator c j Preservation �^t-3aion's, review.. The final specifications for this architec� 11y '�Lntegrated artwork 8'1all be approved by the Planning Co Gc,r.'•, S. The applict"r use personal namus and those of associative, qualities sue,b" __`;winery names or wine labals, on the project site whi%ier possible. 5. No demolition permits shall be issued for existing structures within the,project.'site until the issuance of building permits for any r.cu structure. 7. The applicant shall contribute up to $100,000 to establish a fund for the reconstruction of a 2,000 square foot barn at the " J site of the City,owned ChmZfe� y-Garcia house; wherein local wine industry artifacts will be documented and 8isplayed. Said funds shall be donatecl,,prior to the iusuance'of demolition permits.- The des{q of sd structure shall follow the design of the original Chaffiy,;G,�rcia barn and its ,execution shall, be subject to review and approval of the Historic. Preservation -Commission f in the form of a Landmark Alteration Permit. F. Enviroamental ,Aasesssent: In' completing the Initisi Study, staff. j has identified.•.that- theta are savers"1 poten•,ial environmental impacts as a result or the project. These items includoz I. Traffic: Because of the unusual configuration'of the i_a and the type of users 'being- considered, including -two'100,Ooo+ ;. square foot users, a traffic study was prepared to address potential i=spmcts from"fhe metre on surreue ., s report addressed the trip generation from the site"•at the . b various driveway access points to public at In addition, the report addressed the impacts of the project at intersections and provided designs for the ultimate design or ~'•.• ,. intersections. As a result, the applicant will be providirq following mitigations: .T` Ka7 r PLANNING COW41SSIOu STAFF REPORT CUP-90-37 THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26,_1991 Page 8 a. Foothill Boulevard will be improved with three through lanes. on the south:side of the street, a fully developed median, ` and two;through lanes on the north side. of the street. b. Dual left-turn lanes will be provided at the main entry to the project to accommodate turning movements into the site and to provide for turning'novements into the future project on the north side of Foothill Boulevard. c. Dual left-turn lanes will be provided for eastbound traffic on Foothill Boulevard turning north onto Etiwanda Avenue. d. Dual left-turn lanes will be provided for,.traffi.•'heading north on Etiwanda Avenue Cana turning westbourd-.on Foothill ®i Boulevard. e- Right-turn lanes will be 'provided for!eacl. triveway along Foothill Boulevard and the northerly drivewaay on F.tiwsnda , Avenue. f. A left-turn-only me4:in.,'+reah ;will be provided at the -wosternmost driveway ,<onq Foothill Boulevard in order to access the far southwest'comer of the project. j2. Tree Preservation: This sits contains many mature trees located in basir.ally three areas. A number of mai;ure troea are located around the existing single-family residence-i and winery : complex. Also, a clustcr of trees :is located in the southwest portion of the site around :chat was once the Big Bear Wintry. Finally, a double row of Eucalyptus trees'occupics approximatioy, _ two-thirds of the Foothill Boulevard frontags. Many of these trees are classified as heritage trees and as such, are subject to the Tree Preservation Ordinance. A Condition of Approval has been in-luded, requiringthe a of a:approval ',"fee Removal Permit prior to the issuanca of grading permits. An arborist's report ' shall be prepared in conjunction with the Tree Removal Permit to address the possibility of preservation ;-,and/or relocation of existing trees on site. 3. 'Cultural Rerource®: As noted in the Historic Presser*"c'tion Commission portion of the staff report, there are a number of cultural resources on the site. The Historic :Preservation Commission tools these issues into consideration in establishing the mitigation measures.contained in their.Resolution 91-01 (See' Exhibit "F"). These mitigation measures have been included in the Resolution of Approval for the manter plan. Therefore, although the project could have a significant .affect to these areas, staff found that there will not be a significant effect in this case because of the mitigation measures which have been incorporated " into the project design or included,as Conditions of Approval. -Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated.Negative t4clarat on. 1 ' PLANNINGj�CCAMISSION STAFF REPORT ' CUP 90-3' THE'.WATTSON COMPANY June 26,` 1991 Page 9 III. FACTS YOR FINDINGS: The Conditional Use Permit the,Foothill application is consistent with the General Plan, en Development Code, and Boulevard Specific Plan The project will not be detrim8ntal to'I'W(��y adjacent properties or cant environment- t impacts. The Proposed uses do site plan, together with_the Conditions-of Approval, yj 0 are in compliance with the applicable provisions of tha Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Development Code,:. and City standards The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan 'Amendment will provide for the development of a comprehensively planned' ,,,urbaii community .that is superior to the `deysloomsntshealthorsam se aliowahY , ap air pnativeregulations. Tho sp4endment,wile for development of the SpecificPlan in a mdnaer which is.,consth the Gehe'ta1 Plan and with therelate eyelaoment apd aer,�� "-* -p Ta f a 151 y - Theamendment will prov<dcx•far thetion, improvement, and extensionaf transportation facilities, utilities, ,mnd 'public ,servicesrequired within the Spscific.Plitionally, the amendment will not be detrimental to the 911 or safety or cause nuisances or si9ni Sant a- --a-c^`." aP� vial impacts. i� IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Thegsa item" have bean advertised as p'-u lic hearings is the Inland Vallev f'A'— Bulletin nes+spaper} notices werev sent to all Property owners within the subarea of the Specific Plan, and the site was posted. • V. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends, that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Else Permit'90-37,`issue a mitigated Negative Declaration for the Conditional Use Permit, and recommend approval of Environmental Assessment and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-04 to the Uty Council. Respec ly submitted, i, Brad ler T City lanner BB:SNasp Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Site Utilization Plan Exhibit "B" - Concept),t&I Site Plan Exhibit "C" C,�nc®phial Landscape Plan 1-fthibit "D" Conceptual GrAding .Plan _Fuhibit "E" - Building Elevations r'shibit "F" City,Uouncil P44olution No. 91-059 asolution recommending approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-04 s , Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 90-37 i I[ 46 r, - e 11 Pi 77 �S�d t h7Md+�tC3 14 LM t �__, Figs ZU 1-4 la - �S�• — ��// f ?i .._its s§ � ? �jp{��+� �+-era• "°d'"' ^-� r � it O st J �s at 1. _ _ � J s•t-.rl �� ��� coon• uuas� roan n .uon s CITY OF U AMONGA t3� PI.AIVI� , '� ION EXHMM SCALE: >r, j I is— erg: �z�, .' CT OF UCAMONG ITME'. cs zy1P IONN d t. EXHMTC:,-S SCALE: ! �- 3 ,v '.ia �c 's+cxc fir` -- _ LF 3 5. OWN 0 lnvvd CTIY OF UCAYIONGA PE AI,Mi ., ION �rrt.�: s% r , A 3 fy v � t ��Gti�/.;/ .,!•.'tom- � �'- r� i� � .r•�.r i ;'r i agnr+nwr+� 1 J-P ell M, nr HVN' so '=.I.VMlP P"9 Ot7llr.P.♦K!.i i� u' 'tsi.r Rr1�RP. 4w r etirw'►r r r�. r'' �arr,v9M!► Q.-® Aq Aqv" o { sue►►- j c� s � I,I +II ti;� 1 n a i if a ►ts� 0 •f 'ack s _ A a. a cny OF a UCARQONGA TM.E• L ;Y PLANM1 'H ION EXHIBrr:C-3 SCALE: ,t ,�t `(4�_e :\� :!4 t �. k;.^"r 1 +.ti+ �. ��. if {� � :# � w h �-. _ :� � �r A.:^ _ .� ,c 1_ }; a�. 1 tea* _ , ^r .'„1 C�.. 1' " ' p`_: �i5 `_ '� ^�:.. -��1 f ' , iY_: �. ';� '?. �j �• r.Y- �:y fC,. .,�; +' �^ 'ti:_ .�. _ _-' .. ..� �p� �� �....,:� it �: ... .... � _ �� o � H+ -- . �_-...� �7,�' �a Iffl.[li C.: a ' r a p r Y n r _ es RAJ, qp ivy 77�- 17 AM / 1rr t SS r ���I APe i'J.B:. P.I!eegb PPeJF3[.Is aPe/M od i.. I , 4 ITEM: g2 1MY OF UCAMONGA a ION PLANM `• E3CRMlt:d,-,/'SCE: W ' k_: _ liAlr p } y ac MY 6J.6' UirLil9 O VS1 PLAN `^ ION I11'L,E: gme N •r: r EXH[Brr:.O -4 SCALE: hit �:�•�x 2-� �-� �.,. Is oWAL&VA All, tmw aa�r®® ��t000aaaiiedd CI'lY OF Y UCAMONGA '1 M.E: d�iao>arG PLC ION _....�.-r_.s T7Cm1T: J SCALE. , :'i7O� _. ems•�.� .—�... i�p � F k et � F :;ice� a1ffi. =---., 9 � ]. �..•, .✓•` d"e o er "'fir �-- '7�-�•:���n •i�° ; � i ® :..F r s.69lo0•,1,. ' � , rl *svYAf � �"� s.4 � '��Ar '� m, = A. a.. is •rss , F` t � � r ' F � 4 t ' u r•r.� F � ��g W W N IN it to IL 5, -25 o RESOLUTION NO. 91-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE cny a7MCM OF THE CITY OF RANC3i0 I C CAMONMI CALIF MM, AFPSM-MING HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST 91-01,};1REREBY DESYCNATIM THE C3IMPANE LA, MIDERA, AND ., 0 VMEYARD LANDS AND Sna3.' MES` LOCATE AT 12513, 12601, 12617, 12675, 12705, 12753,, 12777, 12801, 12807,, 12811, 12821, and 12881 F001HII1, BmxzvARD AS AN_HZPr r2F;c POINT OF mmpw,T WHEREAS, on December 6, 1990 and January 3, 1991, the Historic Preservation Cm+++ission of the City of Rand-4 Cuc:=ngat ducted duly noticed public hearings on the application. WHMMS,. this City Council has received and reviewed all regarding said Point of Interest designation. WHEREAS, all legal�,prerequisites to the ac3cpticn of this P.esolution have occurred. ® NOW, TIC, tine city COUnCil of the City of Mwcho Cuca=nga does hereby furl, determine and resolve as follows: - sncrlcrr 1: The applications applies to approximately 62 `acres of land, basically a rectangular config=tfcn, lusted aloasc� the south side of Foothill Boulevard east of Interstate is and wast of �'tiwarda Avenue, APN: 229-031-03 twmXb 13. SON 2: The proposed Point of Intarest mee ,% the following criteria established in Chapter 2.24.09n of the Rancho Cucamcoga Municipal _ Code. A. Hist=ical and Cultural,significm=: rt FindiM It Ttla'pr posed Paint of BV=wt is particularly repres��i- tative of a historic period, typo, style, region, or way oP lffe. : MM iliCArl.O, Sd11:rO,, Capmalla, 'Ellen, Coluabaro, and GAidGM fMdliw famed a cmmunity based on d=vd cultural back- ground, faith, and way of edstwce. 7hew worms# men, and children P inq of EgVM and the makirzj and selling of wires_ in the 489ft= 0XMOn9aj9*XUW= Ek WI& region in the 19201s and 193018. M& h®ss and winery build#s—.j- atand as raminde+°Q of the thrivin; family-bmeld viniculture a= so prevalent in this area. ® ThG Orahaad/YAier ',filling station is linked historically with the small retail wirsa "S and homes it lies next to the ncst pgMlar thMUXffifarG C!j the time, li JU 66. Ma risa of aut=h travel 9MV0 way is the parallel drmlqpmt of roadside diners, ?as stations: and r4paL shops. At one tins, this filled I.'- Of ahem rMft for travelarm° an well, as of the gra- couniunity of Etiwwda. Resolution No. 91-059 Page 2 Firth. 2: Zhe proposed Point of Interest is an exile of a type of � t< building which was orce cam-on but is now rare. Fact: She two houses �,., style as as testaments to the, Craftst�st 'r it was interpreted in the area during the 1920s. ;examples are increasingly rase. Estimated construction,of the filling station :gates to thelate 191os. Firddim 3: The pry Point of Inters", is xmv=ted with a ness or use which was once 'but, is _.;,rare. Fes: Wineries, Large. aad must J � a tnriv�ng majority of the Cucamonga/Etiwanda area's business and land ups in the eta from 19i5-1950. These once extensive agricultural enterprises are ®1 rapidly disappearing from the landscape. `'Ftrrttterssuare, roadside filling stations/restaurants are now all but obsolete B. Neighborhood and QWwraphic ct •�•• Findi*ta x: 114m pro caged Point of Interest materially benefits the 4) historzc character of the neighborhood. Fact: These buildings form a large part of the overall sense of place rid,past in: area. Linjina-2:: The orgxwd Point of Interest in its,lotion represents an established and familiar 'visual feature of the neighborhood, ccrmm unity, or city. Fact: owned by picer families wh4se. ►3ants have stayed in"the coacunity, the how, winery, and filling station have long been an established atrd viably elemmt, in the area. Find 3: The properties are an the City'a histflriGal imwtory. E=: Me properties are listed Cuss. Einar": MW propartion stand- out as hav3A�q a tstand sg historical, architectin al., cultural, = aesthutic significari:e. MUM: The arm disrWtion as ceeaied by the wff.7irg a2',,:aott ,ll Bailemd, the of Istatstate 15, aid the is weasi►g obsolsKmwe cf agricult=l tee in trim region has reduced significantly the content of thm aurae. Sim the project calls out fog the dnolition of all of the rwAnainq buildings and tb—advmlqxc ETOged initial objection to any retention or tra Msmturm, the avisrid—im, s caries be Ttyus, this Paint Interes? Faaolution with mitigation reouzuffdaticm ramognize tr.- grey', historical valua of the area as a mit and sa specific structures. • Resoluticn page 3 £ Designation.,could help protect it. Fact:ls: Regardless of the review, process called isto play.!by objection, tta psi f'oothiU Marketplace would impact greatly ar, historic site with strong cu tural and ethnic significance.. Thus: ; C92A. the pras+'�ciYs1e�"" �•Ativie envixorstal effects• 'i These a-fects can be ameliorated by foLwazg°ta; the Planning`' ammfssion the mitigation ram= ndaticnss'outlined in Secticai 3 of this Resolution. _SFJ4'TROfT 3e 21as designation for Historic Point of Interest has been reviewed aril considered ::in compliance with the California ,Bwi==ntal=' Quality Act of 1970 and has been determined to be categorically exempt and further, the OAr=U hereby+sus that the fbllaw rq mitigation recaumen dations be included with the Planning C=dssion's anvixoearaxttal review and determinaticos for the overall Foothill rtarkstpla-i project: 1) The project owners shall spoor a City-administered oral History Pra_aam of the picnesr wina-making families`of the subject,area. 2) The'existingstxvctt w shall be doct toned fully according to HAM/IUt Standards by an aaehit ct approved by the city. 3) The project owners s shall inmate the Guides and DiCarlo homes and pay for their relocation. to paracna demonstrating ownership of a parcel of land 'within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and suitable for surYi a relocation. Besse hwes shall be available for such donation over a pariod of 180 days. Such pails located in the historic ocamunity of Etb-apla will be given first prefers. �. 4) The project owners shall utilize persocal row..and those of assaciativa qualities, such-am,w3nasy n sa or wiry labels, on the project site; ,poaeiblaa 5) Mu &rmlgw *all incorp=ti faai.lialjjand agricultural Put of the area into o�Tr'eior.el"pablic &Vt ixftgral to the n-ddte&hza1 design of the jkojact. 3luis artwork shall portray Etiwerxira.s wine-inking past in a roalistic style aid the yLojoict'awner will autmit no less than three alternatives in w td3 three different astietic manias fa xthe Historic Aswsv'*Jx= Ammissionts rovim 'Brie final specifications for this ado felt aly-integrated ao Wxk alb to appoved by tl e ® planning ion. 6) No d®olitiert pea ita shall be is , ``for exifting structures withi.z the project pite untill the is ae of buibding Bern is for any:new • Resolution No. 91-059 Page 4 7) The p-mjec�•,` owner shall; contribute toys to $100,000.00 to establish a fund for the reconstruction of a 2,000`square foot barn at the;;site of the City-owned Chagey/Garcia house wherein local wine industry artifacts will be doca�.and displayed. The said funds shall be donated prior t7 the issuance-of demolition permits. the design of the said structure 51+.a11 follow the design Of the Original Cbaffey/Garcia barn and its execution shall, be subject,to,the review and approval of the Historic P ,ovation Corr awicv� in the form of a Lard wk Alteration Pe=i,: SEICTZM 4: biased upon the fitdir%js lard conclusions set forth in Sections 1, 2 and 3 above, and received and reviewed bar this Council. BE IT.-FUIMIER RESOLVED that the City Council of the::City of Rancho Cucamonga appr es the forwatdiM of"them ml:Igaticn r'eoo?mmd%tions to the < Planning Ca lesion and the designation of Lis Qqmnlla, Guides, and OiCarlo viIr yard lards and stet as an Historic Point of Interest. PASSED, A_ , and ADOPTED this 20th.day of F'ebmiary, 1991. AYEti: Alexander, agwt, Stout, Winiams, Wright NOES: Nona ABSENT: None DOW D�satfa L. SCCut, kdyor AT'rE'ST• Defta City Cie3e T. 26CMM J. AMMS, CITY CLM of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do harelay c=ttfy that the £ongoing raw3ution W= chtly pas, approved, acid aid by the city Council of the City of Fand= ox=c--qa, Caaliforr iu, at a rewlar =atirsj of said City OMMCU MA on the 20M clay of 0 fcba+,3ry, 1991, 0 Resoluc n Na3 .pang,g FSccecuted this g5t day of Fek¢vaty, 199S.at Rancho Cucamonga. California. DebMJcr, , City Clerk_ f, F n f r �r ,r I �f- T G RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF +THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-04, REQUESTING TO AMEW)THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN TO MODIFY THE MEDIAN BREAK LOCATION ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, TO ADD A MEDIAN BREAK LOCATION ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USX DESIGNATION FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL FOR AN J V AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 25 ACRES WITHIN THE 'FOOTHILL ` BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 4) LOCATED ON THE EAST \Q SIDE OF INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, IN U CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 160 ACRE RETAIL/COMHERCTAL CENTER LOCA%ED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF i^ FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN INTERSTI4Tt 15 AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-031-03 THROUGH 13, :.5, 16, AND 20. A. Recitals._ (i) The Wattwon company has initiated an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 90-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the 'subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment i3 referred to as "the appa�4,ation•" (ii) on Juno 26, 1991, the Punning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (III) All legal,preZiquisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Rpgsalution. THEREBOR3, it is hereoy found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuearionga so fol),owss 1. This Comission hereby specifically finds.that all of the Facts set forth in the RscitGls, Part A, of this Resolution Ure true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 26, 1991, including written and oral staff .-sports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows (a) The amendment pertains to a t60 acre parcel of land located on the south aift of foothill Boulevard Between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage' of m2,175 fact alon7, Foothill Boulevard and _3600 fast along Xtiwanda Avenue. The site is presently designated for Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial used and is developed with single-family residences, a winst� complex, and a converted gas station; and j;` PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUT.In NO,, FSPA 90-04 - CITY OF RANCMO�tUCAMONGA June 26, 1991 Page 2 i (b) The property to the north is designated for Commercial uses and is improved with a mix of uses including, a churon, single-family residences, retail stores, and a converted winery. The property to the south is designated "for Industrial uses and is developed with an industrial business, is being developed with a water treatment facility, and is vacant. The property to the east is designated for Commercial and itesidential uses and In vacant and developed: with single-family residences. The property to the watt, opposite the Interstate 1S Freeway, is designated for Commercial uses and is vacant; and (c) This amendment will provide. median locations necessary to provide adequate circulation to serve the 'hits while maintaining adequate circulation for the yet underdeveloped parcels on phe north side of Foothill Boulevards and (d) This amendment will provide for a master *planned commercial development as was provided for with -he adoption of the original Foothill Boulevard Specific. Plan; and (a) This amendment will change the zoning designation of an Industrial parcel not originally considored part of a future, master planned, commercial development. This p:"peel would, however, become a landlocked property due to the existing development mind developments under construction to the oouth and engt. The inclusion of this parcel in the master alas is in keeping with the intent of tt. "-FooC'till Boulevard tceeiftc Plan and the General Plan to provide a comprehensively planned area. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing 'az.'Z-upon the specific findings of facts not forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the district that is superior to the development otherwise allowable under alto-.ate regulations; and (i (b) That the amendment will provide for development within the • district in a manner Consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth sanagement policies of the City; and (a) That the asendment will prevido for the construction, Improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required ty development wi`hin the district. 4. This Ca®atssion hereby 'finds t han bean reviewed &nd coneidersd in gem litace with the Californ alit 'Act of 1970 and, urt ert ti...m,. �.-�imeada issuance of a Ns;ative J!1 Declaration. �K-3Z �. J., PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. F5pAy90-04 - CITY OF RANCHOICVCAMONGA June 26,`1991 C page 3 r� 5. Based upon tho findings and conclusions not forth in parag::apha 1, 21 3, 'and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows. (a) The Planning Goan::pion hereby recommends that the City Council approve .and adopt Foothill\* Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment' No. 90-04, as attached in Exhibit (b) That a Certiried Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be 'forwarded to, the City council.. S. The Sssretary to( this Commission shall c0rtify:,to the adoption T this Resolution:- APPROVED.AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE:1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THEYC-,�.TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: `. Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: "\ Brad Buller, Se-rstary _r r I, BraJ Buller, Secretary of the Planning Comiaiaeibn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoAtz`JRenolution was duly and ® regularly introduced, passed, and adopted Py tfre Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hold on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vats-to-wik: AYES: C` 9ESSIONER3:'. NOES:., COM133IO s` i ABSENT: CW=581ONZX3 i :_. P r U 1 { 1cUl LU _� . •, a. 61fell r 7 9 L ch AM ®. C7 Ri (� vam CPk•a!fdA tL B z IL F7- m � 2 �•; �•`•� '�6 a �' c '" O < 9 a c A I f"- y ra. t x, Q zrc U X e +�•+� � ��tp'�� � wad" � i `/1 � n U e a} Q RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING<COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO =O AMONGA, CALIVORNIA, :APPROVING CONOITt7)NAL`USE PERMIT 90-37, A REQUEST FOR'KASTER PLAN APPROVAL FOR A _60 ACRE RETAIL/COHMERGZAL CENTER CONTAINING �rJ: APPROXIMATELY SSO,000'SQOAR$ FEET OF LEASABLE,SPACE AND A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND BUIL'OINIG < ELEVATIONS FOR THE PRICE CLUB FACILITY SIN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OF THE FOOTHILL ZOULEVARD SPECI2IC PLAN (SUBAREA 4)r LUCATEU ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AIYD ETIWANDA A4ENUE, AND NAEING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-031-03 THROUGH 13, 15, '16, AND 20. ® r : A. Recitals. (i) The 'Wattson Company hum filed an application for issuance of Conditional Use Permit 90-37 as dercribed in the title of this Resolution. �. Hereinafter in this Rasoluticn,,;t" subject Conditional Use Permit is rdferred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day_of June 1991, the Planning CommissicrL of tee City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly nr:;ticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (III) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THLREFORE, "it is hereby. found, 3st®rmined,' and ;resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ae follows: " -1. This Commission ;kareby specifically finds that, all of the facts not forth in the Recitals, Bart A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Bieed capon subatfiaatia*; evidence presented to 'this Commission during �► the above-rea'srenced public hearing on June 26, 1991,` including written and oral staff reports. togetI. with public testimonf-s this Commission hereby Specifically finds :ae follows: (a) The application applies to a t60.acre parcel of land located on ths.,south side of Foothill Boulevard between Interstate 1S and Etiwanda Avenue, with a street front4ge�,af i2,175 feet Along Foothill Boulevard and ' t600 feet -along Etiwanda Avenus. The tits is presently designated for Regional Related db=GrCial and Light Industrial uses and is developed with single-family residences, a winery ccmpleS, and a converted gas station; and PLANNING COr1MISSION REcOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARMM PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north is designated for Commercial uses and is itrnruved with a mix oL uses including a church, single-family residences, retail stores, and a converted winery. The property to the south designated for Industrial uses and is developed with an i dus incss, is beingdeveloped -with`a water transmission facility, nd is vacate. The property to the east is designated for Commerc a and Residentia uass aAd is vacant and developed with in is-famil residences. Th p g y .property to the west, opposite the Interstate 15 Freeway, is designated for cemmsreial uses and is vacant, and (c) The project will comply with all minimum standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (d) In conjunction with this application, the applicant has submitted -' a request to amend the land use designation within the Foothill Boulevard Specific` Plan from Light Industrial 'to 'Regional Related commercial. Provisions were previously incorporated into the Fcothi_1 'Boulevard-spacific Plan to allow for such a, change through review and approval ofa Master Plant and (e): The Wevelo v' Parent �of a 3550,OD0 squats 'foot retail/comraireial center in consistent with the Regional ;Related C6 maercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Commercial designation of the General Plan. 3. Basid upon the substantial evidence ..presented to this Commission during the abcvw-referencsd 'public hearing and upcn_tho specific findings of facts set forth in, paragraphs l and 2 above,,,this CommisasC�=i hereby finds and - concluden as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development CFde, and,the porposee'4f the district in which. the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable h thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to propertiea or improvements in the..vicinity. (c) That the p=op644-i use complies with each of the applicable provisions 41.2 the Development Code and Foothill Boulevard Specifi, Plan. �. 91* 9 €ciftission hereby finds end certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with" the California Environmodtal Quality Acl. 4f 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby iswues a mitigated H[y.LivP'Del�l.aration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application-.ubjeet :o each and every condition not forth belcw and in the attached,_ Stansard Condition& attached 6erttc and incorporated herein by this reference. —Tk -37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE t June 26, 1991 11 Page 3 4i Planning Division Y' 1) Approval'of.the Conditional Use Permit is for the conceptual master plan for the entire shopping center and the detailed site;plan and elevations for Price Club. All other building's and/or pads will require the approval of a separate 'Development Review or Conditional Us* Permit applicat(.on, ;as required by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, 2) Approval of Conditional Use Permit 30-37 is contingent upon, approval of Foothill . Boulevard Specific'Plan I Amendment 90-04 and Tentative Parcel Map No.,'13724, 3) Prior`to the issuance of any grading or building permits; a Tres Removal Permit application shall be reviewed' and approved by the City Planner. An arborist's report shall be prepared to address the �( possible preservation and/or relocation of heritage trees on-site. The arborist shall'be;aslected by the � City and,paid for by the developer. 4) No occupancy shall be ;p&rmittaA for any floor until all streat improvements have :been installed to the satisfaction of the City. 5) If phasing is proposed, the phasing plan)shall be reviewed, and approved' by the Planning Commission prior to thei issuance of any building permits for the center. l� 6) Nr,, permanent outdoor storage of shopping carts shall b ` perstittsd, unless otherwise approved by the Plannina Commission 7) Park-Ing .lots along Foothill and Atiwanda ohall be fully screened from the str`et through the use of *3 That berms, low screen walls, and/or shrub planting. The final details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to thv-JaWance of any building permits JIfor the center. 9) A Uniform Sign Profsam shall be prepered for the center and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning'Commission prior to the isamance of any buil&hg permits for the center. The program *hall consist of all on-site signage including, ;but not 7 Vmited to, monument signs, directional signs, and wan'signs. k _ PLANtJYNG `COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 �- FOOTHILL HAIMT PLACE , June 26, 1991 Page 4 J 9), All future pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control prior to occupancy of any Luildin3. Details shall bo included with the landscape and irrigation plans. '- The piano shall be submitted for review and approval by-'the City PlannAr prior to the issuance of any building permite for the center. ' 10) All street furniture, including benches, bike racks, potted plants, light bollards and standards, drinking fountains, tramh recsptacleffi, ate., shall`be reviewed and approved by the„Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any buil� ng permits for the,center. 1 11) Graffiti i:iall be removed within 72 hours. I 12) The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris xti all times and,. in no avant, shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 13) There shall be provision for security patrol of the shopping center at least `three 'times per, evening, seven days ger wsek,,*stwe g the hours of 10:00yp.m. and 5:00 a.m. by s liconssdtgrivate patrol. 14) Bus shelters on Etlwanda Avenue and on Foothill ' Boulevard shall be installed with street improvements and shall be architecturally _compatible to the canter. 'Final Iccation and design of the bus shelters shall be submitted for City Mannar review and approval prior to issuance of any building permi,ta for tRe center.l% j15) Any transformers,, servics areas, or trash enclosures i located near tb� ®itbso a of. Et iwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard'ihall only be considered when they r are scraaned by using a combination of walls, berms, and landscaping. J!1f 16) The -freeway right-of-way adjacent to the project shall be landscaped, or an in-lieu lee paid, i accordance with Planning Commission Resolution N1J. 87-183. Thai"`lan(q.3caps plans shall be approvLd by4he city Planner or the in-lieu fee shall be paid,-:;Aor to. the issuance of any :building permits far the center. 17). Specimen-size trees (36-inch box or larger) shall be provided at key locations:including, but not limited to, entries, plazas, on-site intersections, etc. The --------------- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO- CUP-90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 :Page S type-and location of the trues shall be shown o I n the final landscape plans which,,shall beareviewed and approved by the City Planner &ior;`to the issuance,of any building permits for the center. is) Any outdoor vending machines shall be architecturally integrat:-:'` into the design of rthe,buildings. The vending machines shall not extend•. opt "into the pedestrian walkways. A"ieclaling Permit application shall be submitted for any recycling center and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Pl"nsi prior to ® the issuance of any huildigo permits for the center. 19) Trash enclosures shall be designed'.to fncorporatlC`th7. following design features to the satAsfaction,Nof tEia` City Planners 0 a. Architecturally integrated into the 6sign of the shopping center. t b. Separate' pedestrian access, ,including a self- ' ,closing door; .that do" not require opening of the main Idoors.' a C. Roll-up doors. d. Trash bins with counter-waightsd lids. e. 'Architectiurally'integrated overhead txvllis. 8 £. Chain Sink scraen on top of the enclosure to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure. The chain,i=nk shall be hidden from , view. , 20) The 'epplieamt shall make a Food-faith effort to l obtains permission to grade onto adjacent properties in order to eliminate the need for retaining walls �J �P along the south propariy line. such evident o shall be Presented to the ;Wi %r Planner prior ,,to ::the Issuance of grading pert. ,tt-. . 21) If permission to grade aff-site cannot bs obtains, landscape plan for ketropolitan Water District shall be+'l 'aaviwmd to determine the practicality of Installing 'brought iron fencing on top of `the rstain;;i ng wall in order to i minimize the impact of the solid wail. The plane shall be reviewed-and ® approved by thu City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permitu. cj :. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ®. CUP 90-37 FOOTHILL rARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 6 ..ti 22) Prior to the issuance of-"any permits or accaptar2o of any future application, the applicant, shall submit architectural, Plana, colors, and details to further define tha architectural vocabulary expected for the „ center. The information (including the final colors and verification of all roof-mounted<,equipment for Price Club); shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. 23) A plan of development for on-cite amenities shall be .= r Retablishad to "tin the site together -throwg h pedestrian-scale linkages. $lemanta to consider include, but <t are nct.:limitedo, hardscape treatment _•and 'patterns, landscaping, trellises, kiosks, street furniture, casting' area, plazas,`building features, signags, at.,, The final plans shall be reviewed ani, approved by the Planning,Commission prior to "the'., issusr:e of any building permits for the cantor. '• z z 24) The fin•wt design of the ;staining wall along the freeway off-ramp shall be reviewed and approved by the Design,R&Iw Committee prior to`£azuance of any building p5mit■ for the center. 25) Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Coda Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested,°> or final, nor' will building /l ' permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the t Notice of Determination (NOC) regarding `- the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the.Board of Supervisors of the 0 1( County of San aarnardinof and .(2) deny and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish.,and flame Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Depab�ent with a stamped and conformed copy of the'NOD together with a receipt showing that allr :Peas have been paid. IV, the eve%o s ;`application is determined exempt from such !s•, rr esa pure}cant to_the provisions of the California`Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines ®' promulgated thereunder, incept for payment of any required handling charge fc0 filing a Certificate of Fes Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. ,,� Sh- � J � 1 I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June'26, 1991 `` l Pcge 7 j ; t ,f Historic Preservation 1) The applicant shall sponsor a city app'i�ovscc Oral m i� History Program of the nionesr wine-makiilq families of the subject area. The;program shall l?e completed ' prior to the'issuance of any building permits for the center. �( 2) The existing structures shall be-, documented fully j according to HASS/HAER- s'andards by !/an architect approved by the City and paid for by q,be applicant. ' The documents shall be submitted fa=' review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of permits for either demolition or relocation. 3)- The applicant shall offer to donate fLe Guiders and DiCarlo homes to persons demorstratinla ownership of a parcel within the City of Rancho Cucamonga suitable for such relocation. These homes SW'11 be available for such donation over a period ci ill days and the applicant shall pay for relocation costs. ` Advertisements shall be placed in lthe Inland valley Daily bulletin and The Sun newspap tars, at a minimum, overy,: eek_'n3 during the 180-day p�►riod. .She size of the advertisement 'shall be one-eighth page and the content shall be reviewed: snd a proved by the City Planner prior to the submittal,'to the newspapers, Parcels located in the historic f, wunity of Etiwanda wili be given first pref�'^�ncef ; All documente;tion dsmonstrating compliance arith tWic.cond&tion ah411 be submitted to the City Planner Prior to the issuance of dewlitioa permits. 1 4) The applicant shall incorpciatc the familial and architeetwcal pact of the /fare& into commissioned public art integral to-the architectural design of ® the F=!i ce. ThLa artwork shall portray southern atiwanda's'wine-making past in a realistic styles and the applicant will subAit no' less ''han three alternativsa, in no less than three different artistic =Lums, for the Ristoric Preservation Commission's review. The finsl opecifications for a this architecturally integrated 'retwork shall be approved by the.Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center.' 5) The applicant shall use personal names and those of ` associative qualities, such as winery names or wine labels, on the project site wherever possible an'dm appropriate with the approval of the canter's Unifor Sign Program, 7 ?"WING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL kpRKET PLACE June 26, 1991 `age q 6) No demolition permits shall be issued for existing structures'withii) the project site until the issuance of building permits for any new structure: 7) The applicant a ,-tl contribute up to $100,000 to establish a fund the reconstruction of a 2000 square foot ba_n �i the site of the City owns,; Chaffey-Garcia house, ,�ihsroin local wine inductrrl, , artifacts will be' documented and displayed. Sg 11 id funds shali be donated prior to the ::i­Jeu4nc* of demolition permits. The dssig� of said structure shall follow the design .of the original Chaff�ry- Gix;ia barn and its'execution shall'be,,subject to rsv�sw and approval- of the Historic Erescwsri, Comm,'isioa in the+ form of m Landmark Alteration , F�,O�g�ixina Division 1) E?r sting Overhsad Utilities t a, 1�oothill _ward - An in-lieu fee xs -,gpntribuU,,.f io the future undergrounding-of the afsting overher,,d utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite 1_idm of 'Foothill Boulevard .hall be -)aid to the Cit7'prior_to tea �. isaaanc* of -iuilding permits. The faar.nail be cia -half ci fihe ,City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly terminus. b. Etiwanda A!ara:a'- An in-lieu fee as contribution do the futurs 'andcrgrounding of the existing overhead atilitiae lelactrical except for the 66 kv electrical; on- the apposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be aid.to the City prior p Y to the 'issuance of building pormito. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit smoant time the length from the center of Foothill Boulevard to th )south project boundary. e. Gverhrad utility service lines which 'cr'can FoothAl Boulevard and 8tiwenda Avenue shall be ' rived concurrLntly with the removal of the _ oxisting houses on Che sout6-- ,ads-af Foothill ' Uoulevard� 2) Foothill Boulevard shall be constructed from Ztiwanda Avanae to the westerly project boundary as follcu-a: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 FOOTHILL MAMT PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 9 r a. (Full u'Width on the south side including the median 1. -1D b. The ultimate backbcni system on the north side consisting of two travel lanes (27-f{..) wide pavement) and the median curb or as o`£heruise approved by the City Engineer. c. Landscape; the median island. EY% .he developer may)4 request a. 0simbursemant agreement to recover the cost of one-halt width of landscaping fronting his project from'future.development' of acroce the-strew properties'. d. Construct a complete tntersectich of Atiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard.with transitions to most existing pavamev*-=alst on Foothill Boulevard rind north on Etiwanda_Avenu ' Also the traffic signals shall be modified ate.the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Both items shall be as approved by the City Engineer. e. The developer shall be eligible for fee credits against and reimbursement'from the Transportation Development Fee for the portion of improvements determined by the City Engineer to be of supplemental size, length, or capacity over that needed or the impact of this dpvsloiZnent in conformance with,ercanance No. 455, 3) The traffic :signal 'shall ba installed at the main entrance on Foothill Bcul6a�d .at the developer's + expense. 4) The median island within Foothill Boulevard be =ved'southerly so that it is symmetrical about the ® centerline.;or as otherwise approved,by the_ City tngin!+sY. 5) The FoothLI-Z Boulevard busbay shall be moved westerly ;I to be as close se possible to the median opening to . reduce potenti�\ jaywalking across Fcethill 3 Boulevard. t,f, 6) Etiwanda Avenue shall be widened en both sides ae necessary to accommodate the- ,streat improvements ;r necessary to jaib�7ate the traffic' impacts of the .. j prcject as csquir, by the City Engineer. ` I i PLANNINQ'pOMHISSION RESOLUTION'N0. CUP 90-37 - F00'MML MARKET PLACE June'26, 1991 Page 10 ri ?) Provide double (opposite, direction) left.turn lanes' within Etwanda Avenue to serve the project entrances, Chestnut Avenue, and a future, dr%veway on the east aide of Etiwanda Avenue, or as otherwise, approved by the City Engineer 8) Provide a curb-adjacent sidewalk for the buipbay cn Foothill Boulavard. Also, the curb-adjacent sidewalk •for the busbay on Etiwanda Avenue shall be minimized. 9) Provide a:meandering sidewalk in accordance with'City Standard No. 304 on Etiwanda Avenue. The sidewalk on; Foothill Boulevard and Ztiwanda Avenue shall meet all driveways at the zero face of,the curb return except for the main entrant• on Foothill Boulevard and as otherwise approves: byithe City Engineer. 10) A final traffic ptud;\'owing calculations for the I r determin,ettors of the len h of all, left turn lanes on Foothill Boulevard and Eti,.-Zcnda Avenue based on poet 2010 traffic ccnditicns h_a3} ;be submitt*. A to and approved by the City En4lkis r prior W. final' map approval or issuance of building perml,ts, whichever I f_ occurs first. All street facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 11) A lot line adjustment shall'- be recorded:` to Incorporate the northerly`porti- of APN 229-021-59 and the westerly portion of API r29-031-16 into this project prior to the issuance of building perm+ts. 12) All of the project driveways and the internal drive aisles to be used by trucks 'shall be designed to accommodate the Caltrand standard 50-foot radius turn templets unless justification is peovided for a looser design radius as approved by the City Engineer. C^; _ 13) The property necessary for thN�proposed'freirva,y off- ramp at, the northwest ccrner',1cf the site shall be reserved. It appaara that ;4trans will not allow the retaining wall shown on­�che plsnsf therefore, additional land to what is showrn on the plans, will need to be reserved as appra,ad by Caltrans and the City Engineer. Also,::the,project plans will need to` be modified accordingly. � r- 14) Drainage fees for the development 'Gall be paid as - � follower -` 1 ; S A) 5,,i PLANNING COMMISSION :SOLUTION NO'; CUP 90-37 FOOTHILL HAMET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 11 1C a Etiwe^d4/San Sevaine area fees for the-portion of the Site within that area boundary (easterly-St acres). -' b; General City area fees for the portion of this site outside of the Etiwanda/,San ilevaine area. c. A payment squivll�nt to the Day Creek Hello Roos Aseaur-�ant of $4;..7S per acre for 1:ke portion of the sites currently outside the LSy Crook Channel Hallo Roos District boundary, f 151 Approval shell be obtained .from -ae Municipal hater District and San Beriardino CQcaty Flood -control District to accept the existing flows from north cf Foothill' Boulevard to the facility along Arrow Highway and nay- Cr �k Channel. If such approvals c�not be obtained altsrnato facilities such as those required by thely�`Etiwanda/San Sevjine Drainage Policy (Area 9) shall to provided as approved by the City Engineer. ... �`. 16) Interrectian drains eha11�be groric',od across"1�oEthill Boulevard at gtiwandu Ave" o sired`,fio convey as much flow as ceasible as approisid by the'Citj Engineer. rr .0) Drainage facilities shall be extended tq r :forth aide of Foothill Boulevard along the prcj#1 Frontage to collect as much flow as feasible as approved by ' the City Enginasr. 18) Adequate provision shall bu made fad aicep rnce for dieposai of the drainage entering the• \vcperty from the adjacant�Caltrans area to the west. 19) The anall portion;of the south*set far er of the ?soperty "ll be regradtl to drain to'tho Hunir pal witee District facility. 20) construct C:O= drain fr.,cilitier. to serve the site gsaaral2y as shown on thea plans and as described in the project's preliminary drainage report subje.t'�tc final plan `chA-•pk and a final drainages report,,.as approved by theVcity`Engineer.. 21) Eaismants for and psrmission to constvuct:atarm again facilities on and convoy flows to off-sits'properties Shall be cbtainad`,�nd provided as Epgrovw- ;by 'Mi City inginser. v :PLANNING CC,N2fSSION RBSOL'JTION NO. ,CUP^,O-_-7 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE" , June 2t, 1991 Page 12 22Y, Easements ..for public srorm1dra.ins wi!th�n the sit®;:, _ shah be provided. 23 The develo j por and the City, shall enter jInto, afi,. agreement that trAnufsri maintenance rosponatitbliti"ea " ^ 'from tha City„to''the ,dr,!.plopar for the d>aii�age facilities serving, FOOthiL" foulwvsrd at *1!,h `:ime that altern ate =facil3tiesK 'for di-poring of the Foothill Boulevard drainage in prcvjded'and approved by the City Attorne;^ and:City,Enginciir. 6. The Secretary to t s Cc=ission ehi11 certifystti the adeption:'4i thla Resolution. �l APPROVED A-4D ADOEIE9 THIS,26TH DAY OF J1Tit$ 194Z, i PLANNING COXHISSION OF 11f C7':1f OF'rAHCHO CueAkONGA , 1 BY: Larry T. Y(Mali Chairman ATTEST: ' brad Buller, Secretary, I, Brad Buller, Secretary of ,the Planning Comgtziion o'A the City of Rdncho,. Cucamonga, -'p hereby certify that the' t foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introductd, ,gasssd;, and adopted by=that Planning Commission of the City of Rnnc)3o C<icEmonga, at &:regular meeting of the P1annLng Commission held on the 26th stay of Jules 1ggl', by the following vo£a-to-wit. AY,ZS: COMMISSION I 1diiSSt COiIlSI8SY4NA"1B. L ,f AB.'AFSNT: CiCYSSYORR!!!: v J DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ® zPTAN "Aw" � . Am" No% PROJECT$: .c,M, 40-37 SUBJECT: i%tG %+4AEC�L1l�4CE APPLICANT: LOCATION: CT(5 "a�"%(z Those items checked are Conditbas of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL.C OWTAe,:THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714 OW-1661,FOR CWFLIANCa WITH THE FOLLOWING COQdISPfWNS: � A. Time Limits S9t9ti vl t. Approval shall expire,unto s e.-tended by the Plafi kV C-A:NriAssion,it Lulding per:rats are —� not issuedorvpproveduse.sas not contm ncWwit�Y,t 24 rzaths from ilm date of approval. 2. DevelopmienvDesign Review she'_'W:gpproved prior II& _ 3. Approval*if Tentative Trad No. 4 granted tnk,'sd to the approval of 01_ ✓� 4. Thadeve"rshakcom=nco.-,vA5* Lein arldoonahm teorCit-FStoi-m Srn^tDt particip-fed in,or corwim ded,a f i3(Sa R Corti mnity Far�bs DWft(CFO ,w tt e Pwcho Cueamevw Fire Pr@tr fin Dkirkt t4 f1ris tCO„o� Ilion ardor malr'w-A u W I a fire slaWn to svr k .he d*.44op f It The station shd It 'c-f�: :and built to a spacitfcatirstte of tie Rwzra Ct+r&ar ca:Ire I;fatttdiq.t Or Vic.`aw spnill becoms tr � oWrk s p ZpWty tlpon _:. The etau"*M Md be setee;c-by the Obi in a=rftw lath b nertde. In"ny+b Rld tlj of a station,Ito dwelrp&i&W wrrpsy with all apigic"MmaiwiNgAIIIINIs.the CFO shaW be iom^4 by Ow Q?a.ft and the o eviko lr by the tirns maNdstion of II'4 final map oocura. i S. Prior to retx cWion of the final mill;or the rosk rM1,..,F bum-g'pcf tit3,yr A%w comes �' first.tne-applicant strati consent to,or paftL::.+aav In.Leh'ei9itAoitt�f�flf $ Milto-Boas Communq Facilities Obtrk i9i it*cort m4ilor-'—�rttat;2nm rr?ne "scNaut facilities. tfowever.:i arcs sc,)oot dlatridhaspsd. �>a� Corrers+nky Fa"%es L?istrIc-.th!f . ..:nf 3itail, in the ait . `1cftl of the pmy d=site into the tem.-y.,k such;t:sisiting Oiahrdd prk r" 'u fft m or ttsr issuarrse all building pefmss.tvhicttevare sstfttes firrr►6.Fu, 4d 3K=1 ® distrxt has nQt forrttet{b t�a�'�tt#JSf�onfntunity Ft€83(�riCt vJA.i�'s�._.. .,rtt3rtths from � the Sate of approval of the props pnd prior to ftt0ordaWn of tht+fiscal mus W isstlame of building pesnuts for said pn pet,alit;wrdilian shah be datmad ratty and void. sc-A/sl lolls -J ~�a This condition shall be waived it tke City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school dlstrfds have enfEred into an agreeri-ant to privately accommodate any and all school i impacts as a resuft of this•proi=. �. 6. Prix to recordation of the final map orariorto issuance of building permits when no snap is, -.i.__J—' involved.wrlttenceit'" tfrorr.'tneaffectedwaterdistrict tthradecuate sewer andwater facilities are or will ue, ailable to serve the proposee,!-rojectsnail bs submitted-to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must.:.tea issued by the water district within 90 days priortof.al Map approveiuiihe case of subdivision orpriortoissuance of permits in the Case of Lii oti,er residential projects. S.Site Develo"non. 1.'.ate site shalt be developed and maintained in aooardarce:vith the appioved plans which _L J_ include site plans, architectural eleva.:arts,extertor malarials and colors,landscaping,sign t program, and grading on file in the Planning Dkftlon,the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulatir .acx9 �rzalrt� rr�l�� ; Spc dic Planar d _ Planned C'�mmunity. V 2. Prior to any usn of the project site Or tx.sinesa activity befrtp cgpmenc-e,thereon, all Conditions of 4,proval shall trtf comp%tcd:a tho satWactlon of ttie City Planner. 3."Occupancy ofthe facility shall notcommencetkasuchtimeasa!]Unifor.tiBesilding Code ar'st � State Firr,Marshall's regulations have Seen compIW weh. Prior to occupancy,plans;shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga€@.3ro!EcWn Dltltria and Ow Building and Safety Division to show toms. ance. The buiktirtp shah be inspected for cont,,iLvce prior to occupancy., 4. Revised site plans and buikfirg eleva9art s Wicorporakig all Conditions of Ai*vval shall be submitted far Cad/Planner mviewwr and appmvaf pr;,7r to esuartco of tt:.'Wrg pemkiS. J 5.All sita.grading,laad;.caps,irrigation,arid WOotirrWovemYnt plans shall becoordinatedfor consistency priorto"sstaar,a of any PORT tg(fit es gading,p-sa rerrlcwal.encroachnem; btAk 19 etc.).or Oar ti)final mr>ek eppriQvej in the can of a custom.lot suttd"lon,or approved usd has commOrmd,vrflicttdva'thiRes ftrsl S. Approval of this reiWest sha!'a not waive with ali mrwns of ei t Daveloprner,4 Code.all tither appftaOMe`:%. ,areaaa,sett!a, ib Community Ply or Specific I Plans in We*at the tkft of Building Femij N*mrlce. 7. a W4"RgNingplan shay be reviewed V—`appmved by the Cky PIwsmr and irrY's rW? 11)pr�r 10 the iS 2flt:)V buI r V perm'ffi. Such pian"sKatl Kate stytr �iurriiri ri,bc�ion,height,and rriethott of sh6 :1p so as not to adversely s affect a*wg propO IN. -_6. a;:acantraliiadtrashfWAPtadAigar WovkW,altrMpi*-rpsh2iII:wkriradivir$taluniis with all recgXacbs Shielded from puM view. ✓ 9; Trash receptaCle(s)are mWired and shah fneat Clly nandasds. )be finial design,10MUcI1 _and the foumhsr of MZh rw*pae:es shall be sub46 ilr Cay Pin rttier►evww W4 aproval 96or to issuance of buiidittq permits. 1 G.All-purd-rvt r4ed utility appurtertarxis such Ps trarislor nuns,AC condensers,etc.,sk,ett !f bt-,caledo ft hi dui view acid adoquateh/screengd through the user of a combination of concrete ar masonry walls, t:e,=-,Pg, ari(Yor lar4VAgL-q to the satisia&lon of the City ;)IannHr. sc•zist J, lorta fir[) ' t t.Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval i7 accordance vir,h i i the adopters Str98t Naming Policy prior to approval of the final snap. V 12.All-.11ding numbers and individrrai units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, .ding proper illumination. detailed plan indicating trail widths,maxis, m slopes,physical conditions,fencing,and _J weed r;ontrol,in accordance with City Master Trail drawings,shcAl be submitted for City Plann(ir review and approvsipriorto approval altii recordation of the FinaiTract Map and prior to approval of street improvement<rd grading plans.Developorshall upgrade and construct all trails.including fencing and drainage devices,in conjunction with street improvements. 14.The Covenants,Condfaans and Restrictions(=Rs)shaft riotprohrbitthe keeping of equine animaiswi)ere zoning requifementsforthe keeF:ngof said animals have been met.Individual lotowners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animalRwithoutthe necessity of appealing to boards of directors or nomeowners'associations for amendments+o the CC&Rs, IS.The Covenants,Conditions,a td Aestrictions(CC&Rs,:and MI:i•es of incorporation of the J Homeowners'Association are suLlact to the apptovat of t1*01anning chid Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney.They shall bo recorded concurrently with the Rna".:vtap or pear to the!ssuarze of building permits,whichever occure first.A recorded copy shall be provided tp the City Engineer. cis 16.Alitoarkways.open areas,atidlardscaphVshallbepsnTiiknq±llymawastedbythaprcpa:iy owner, hdmeowrmrs•:assscidtion,or othar'means accap=la to the City. Proof of 1;7;s landscape maintenance,shall be so-b;ttmod for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of[wilding p0mils. 17.solar access easements sMs be dedicated fcr the purose of a wl that each lot or -1�-1-- dwelling unit sha'.)have the right to receive sun"attvsa adWAnl ots or"rifts for use of a solar energy system.:he casements may becorttainedinaV,�^— fi4tionofRsstrlcifonsfor hesr!bdivisionwhichshalltorecordedcorimmeritowith ft rts�Jatlonof the final nxpor isa, s co of permits,whichever corms first.The easernerits shah prohtft this casting of inbclows by vogetatioP.,xiruclurea,thttum or any otherobjfl,-i,except for utiiiiy wires and 1 similar objects,pursuant to Deveiopriera Code:clan 17.W.OSG-r2. { 18.The projoct contains a dyiaigrtated HiaMrfcaf t.andlrmtk. The sits steno be developed and _/—J— maintained in accordance t+i kh'.a Hictaft LandwArU Alteration€a Ymft Iwo. Any further ffwaiaiiiftm to os site kKkA6V,but not Mted to,routerlor aftwelans and/or intericraftralcinewhich9Wthe®saarlorofthetxriidlrtgoonsittticbm,remevsloflaMmark trees.d9malftfi,retoeatisrt,reoor nXilonOf orchangestoU4site, shwa mgltifo a rilodlif"[0111 to fits Historic landmark",e son Poct%ii MOO*tu:i,V-01c Preservatiti Convninlon regrew and appral. C. Building Design I. An alternative ene s ern is required to provides die hot ma:ttr for all tlwaflkig units J�1 rgY Y� � and for heating any swvrlrning pool or spa,untese otheraK~.ltafivrtt wargli systmTo are dements[ratodtobeofegtrfvaletac2pac49MOri Wiey. po*instaffod-Jttte t time of MIM development shag be`si 9rmnled'w9h solar NOV. [Details shaft be I incriuded in the building plane and shall be sL6-rheel for City Planner review and approval Prior to the issuance of bu;M9 permits. _ Z All ftfi.'ings shall have the front. side and rear elevations upgraded Sri('"h an hitecturzi treatnteria.detailing arA ftreasedt4@neationof'wilaeo trealmeni SMIC to City Planner reviety and approval prfar to issuance of building!teffts. SC-2/91 3ortZ /�"�D t l 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners'Association shall be submitted for City Plarnler and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits,t v/ 4. Ail-r.af appurtenances,including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or J—J projections,shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacern propenies.and streets as required by the Planning Division, Such:screening shalt be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner, i I' Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parkin;arc;Vehicular Access(Indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscatk3 islands shill have a mirdnwm outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12•inch walk adjacent to the parking stall(0ckiding curb). 2. Textured pedoatnan pathways aid textured pavemeta norm c rcutatton aisles shaft be j--I provided throe Wutthu development to conned dws"afuriftbl ildingswith open spacesf plazastrecreatkinal uses. 3. All parking spaces shall.be dou4la`i is ed oar City standards and as diWeway aleles, ernrarxes,arid,exits shall be striped spar Lily standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage doer openers i4 driveways are iessthan 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk i! 5. The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions shaltrasirkadteasora"ofrscn-r-etionalvehicleson this site unless they are the principal source of transporalttion for tiwow, r arttrl;prohibit ,parking on interior circulation aisles other."in doss d v1skor parking areas. 6. Plans for any recur., gates sW be submlffed for On Clly PlArtner, City Eng?neer,and -J__J �p 'RanchoCuramar* icaProtecWnDktftreji.11w WaMMvVJWWt isaaant:eotbulidrig permits. F E. fandsoaping;(for publicly maintained tandem aa'eass,rafr 40 Seaton id.) 1. A detailed landscape 2Wkrigaiatn plan,lnr,9�cirpb AiaMnparrd lhamefandscap-� iing 41 the case of residential develloWat. xM to prqmmd`hy a Rented latmW.,pe archit®ctand submiredfar ckyPia rm tpvgr►er' sygrovai presto ti eimarrmotbuiiding Permits or prat f nil nirp appMvW in the case of a cosiom lot 2. Existing Imes(>Ztcluifmdt9.beprasa6FV+8tlinp f4taNi pIUtQS idwibla "barrier J__1 inacwrdartbawtdi the Muni*VCode r19.()@.9t0.alfldsoftedariftwaWig glans. �l Theioc�tionat afraes preaervr'inpWco andrtewiecatksrto4ottr:i aosttodtrgss shagb®4hi�4fOitt'h!t)B�iEadil�idiC#p�D;;�..`�.Thta f1?'ANfO�YIf.t�Q9tfi�albdri54'S r= preservattiM.dansplMling and tdlrttitifg.miethods. 3. A Me.C=pftW d blsfolMing gUM gW b@ StoVkW within the pm*A: %-AS-fth box or I&W, 'fo•3&"box or larger, �,;_°h-2rf•irxds"box or l;rr�ir %.15•galPhn,df3 96<g l�axov►. 4. A nrnimum of :g %of trees plantedwihin the paoNic t sm be speclitnen size trees• _/_J 24-inch box or larger, S. Within parking lots,tr@-%S shall be planted 0 a rate of am 15%Jion tree for every three r_ parking,stalls,sufficient to shade 500y.f.4 tits pL-Ning„aroa at soiar noon,on Aunusi 21. k_; , Sc-2/91 c of 13 j tl • �r 37 6. Trees shall be;;inrne3 in ar<3Jafnubiic view adjacent to and along structures at a rate otone tree per 30 linear feet of buiiding"- r nr 7. All private Slope banks 5 feet or less in vertiem;-height and of 5:1 orgreater slope,but less M;i ��- 2:1 slope,shall be,at minimum,�.-riyated and landscaped with,appropnata ground cover for _ erosion control.Slope planting required by this section shall ixluda a permanarrt irrigation System to b8 installed by the d3vekiperprior to occupancy, 8.. All private Slopes in excess of5 feet,but less than Meet,invertica;heghtandof2:lorgrcat®r —�-� slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erasion corm l and to soften their appeararn a as Views:one l5-callonor larger size tree per each 150-It.of 31ape area,1-gallon or larger ' size shrub per each 100 sq.ft.ot slope area,and app`i;,pdate ground cover.In adtfitton,slope baNts in ex;ess orb feet in ver:iral height and of V or greater sloei)shall also ir4lude one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 25t1tsq,ft.of slope area.Tress aitd shrubs shall be planted in staggered Clusters to soften ar'.Yvary slope plrte.So"planting required by this section sl tli include at permanent irri9-ion System to be intdalled by 4he developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family rt}si�tsrttial development,all i plantinp and irrigation shall be ca6',91nu- _L—J oust'maintaineav_hiaUthyandtts.-ivingoorditleflbythadsvetoparultileachlndi�tati unit is soKand^•;.cupledbythabuyer.Priortoreleaafngo=jpancyforftuututs.aninspWion shall ba conducted by tfK`t Planning.Division to djI*rntln;that thoy are in SaUstMory conditr.m. _ 10.For mtilti•family residential and nan resit entiaf prop"awnefs are respon- J--J— sible to,the ciahunuai mainlonaPrCe of all 4 Wacapstf areas On-Sill,;as wei as t or?dguous' plantid areas within the public dgIVM-*'zV, AN farzia,IaM areas sftaall be kept free from weeds and debris and rUrKained in a haait1ty and t tri V oandilfon, and shall receive regular pruning,,fertilizirsgI rr.Owii,g, and hirtx;*V. Any damaged;rase,,diseased,or decaying plant material shah be repiwSMAWn 30 drays Vom the data of dfrrttage. tt.Front yard landscapira et4 be rw;ulud per fhtt Davei*mist Coda slid 1,1r This r6quitatrent$MR be In addition to-tha required stree®ttrees and slcM planting. 12.The final design of the Wrilater parkways,wake,l nd3captrtg„vnd tsidswaiks shah!be �JJ included In the retaiir6d latxkMe p;m&M SM to tttaijM to City Riariner rttview and approval arid caordihated(cresstsietiftcglailnanypafkviay litndrspingplanwhichrnaybe required by the ErMinsarIN t711ilt W. 13.Spacial lardwQpa features t as rncur:r ,akMW took t�od"n b1ze tress.rmander- —1-./— �v inn;irdewaihs(vMh, than"),aril lritnfseiflsd landwapliv,Is rewirtid 210M V'e 16.LLr&4jpkjg aftd kttgslibn ayiiSM tagtrtred to 4 lnat;,i redfifci iltte garb tfphkf-way on the 001111 OU G1 this fmjM area SW tW cortifrretrsly by tttp developer, 15,A„wells shag bepMV,*dwkhdawraflatreanard.iffooata3 in Iptoft=Wgnz=areas, ram_ the deso shad tag coorftaed w-m the frt*,L'4 i minim 01 16.Tree 1`11MOrance'Criteria shal be dovebW slid tfstbmided for Cliy ft44twr WASW am _ aPPfQVV prior tt1 Mane@ of bui pit• Thm alada Shall Ft=rarp the natural $sewth 1Z19raM663tiCS Of tha aeWed-ft**spwfQ3s. i tli ,_1is isC?¢titt4 and Irr MI.On Vaal be da*,*d to confsIar wsttir thfalf¢fi t?` prinCfple3 of, Xeii as defir 2d In CI War 1S,:a,.ate Rancho Cucamcf*a Municipal Code. .I � SC ..2),91 3af to F.Signs Casa -Y Du« 1. The signs ind!W(W on the submi.ted plans are conceptual only arid not a part of this approvaL Any signs proposed(or this d+f ebpment shalt.comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall} require separator application and approval byths Planr'.rg Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. AU-niform Sign Program for this development Shall be submitted for Q*91smw review3nd _<._J-- approval poor 20 issuame of building,perririts. 3. Directory monument sign(s)shall be provided for apartment,condominium,:or townhomss prior to occupancy and shall rerAmiro separate appl"a ,, and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.Envir,nmentel iII - t rho developer shall provide each proSeerYive buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rack ;.rusher projm in a standard format as determined by iris City Planner,prior to accepting a. cash deposit on any propsrty. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice'of Chas City lh&-Med -J--J SWIM Studies Zone for the Red'i-ill,Fault,in a slandan tonnk as determined by'iho City Planner,prior to accepting a Cash deposit on any proper y. 3. The developer shall provide each pcospecklij buys+writit+n mlice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as'd+ltermmned°try the City Planner.prior to ac1co%I;V a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall of su'ir mod toicfty Pfarm revWl and approval prior to the issuance of buikting per mRC The final report shall diseut s the level of irttedsr;noise' attenuation to below 45CNEP_,the building materfalsand Constru--lonfechniquosprovided, and Aaporopriats,verity the ademacloftW'MItgatlzrimetsums.The building plansw'illba I: uitecked for conformance with the nitigation n oiseres contained in the final report. H.Other Agencies � t. Emergdttcyridgr9�ac�s8s�ibepnsv�dlnaot�rdartcewighAanc4tormgaFira J---�— r� Protoction iNstrict avidarda. 2. r�ecpertcyaaassahaalliw+providst�.rrtaintertara:afrae�'.�r a nftrmm of 26 feet wide —J—J— at as tunas during=WTMlon to acoftailce with Rantt9 Cucanotp Fire Protection District requisarnenta. _1 Prior to WAmm at tv;I&V pertaft tat comblistRM conctnuction, evickeme sftatt be _J___ submitla r,ftF7tncioP,wtm a Fins Protection OiwekAtW!em4tporW water su for fire PMWMn fa,ly ,port completion of mW ad W@ ptatectkan system: _a. The w_pgcM shalt et'tttatct the U.S.Postal S vice fe detaftrelte mn appropriate type arty! :_.,,J__J_ locationofrtdbost:;;_lAtKWWMrrea ftsia;rrm>eltts shaill povift a saW Wafmad Structure for m"Owes etyt adfigaste lay.'slur fib locawn of thqno bore and the aeci,-pi It the oveAfead StrijMra shall be; rj to City Plank Mvimew anti approval prienr to the isauanca of bulb permits. S. For,ptojeels use sWIc tank faeirmtses.-wrMen acc e"Ry,Irrylllding auf— Supportive;nformatiort,sw to obwlno trom mho.Satz gestlWrV C#dtlty Dspartrtra ti3;.ot Emrlronmt.�rlal Heaah and subisi ed 11Af!V'3uJttisig QHicial prior to tfta issuance of Septmc Tank Popri ts;and prior to Dance of Isu;'&fist9 pemtit�s.^^ / !i SC•2/41 6 0/tS 5 1 i t, APPLICANTS SMALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) SN-1663, FOR . COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I.She Development j ✓—1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adapted Uniform Building Code.Uniform A leahani- J—1�— cal Code,Uniform Plumbing Code.National Electric'�as,,and all othat;iTAICable codes, ordinances and^'gala&&Jns in effect at the tip of issuance of relative pernuts. Please contact the Building and Safety Division ft:r copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2.Prior to issuance of building permits for a now residentliI dwelling unit(s)or major addition toexistirKIun:t(s).the appilcant shall pay development taosa,he established rate.Suchtees may irckrie,but are not limitedto:City Beautification Fee,Park Fee,Drainage Fee,Systems Development Fee,Permit and Plan Checking Fees,and School Fees. ✓ 3. Prior to ixuance oP building permits for a new conrrarcW or industrial development or —J—— addition to an existing development,the applicant shah pay devebpmatnt fees at the established rate. Such fees may include.but are not limited to:Systems Deveopment Fee, Drainage Fee,Sctvuol Fuss,Permit:and Plan Cheddng Fees. 4. Strestaddre s ses shall ba provkJed by the Building Official,aftertraicUpamel map recordation J — and prlor to ise fiance of building psmft. J.Existing St-ttcturas 1. Provide compliance with,the Uniform Building Cods for rite prcperty line clearances —J—!-_ considering use,area,and fire-w.1311venass d exitlirtp buildirIO. 2. Exizlln g buillings;shali be rttt de to comply wall conned building and zoning regulations for J_l ` the insane i use t it the building shall in damoilsttsd. 3. Existing sxr.,qe rgosal facigllas shag be removed,ff 7ed andforc4ppod to comply with the Ungdrm Plumbing Code anciUnitonn Suitng rode. v/_4. Undorground on-sits Lrd%ft we!o be loWed and tlhmn on bui I WV plans tnrbmitted for _.J—!_ building psrmlt,applicatisnt. K.Grading 5. Grading c7 the noblect WoWty shall be in Acmdrve wIM the Urtfam BuNroj Celle, Grading Slouhlrds.and 'Wed grate t?ri0m ,Otte tifta9 Qpade►g plaint shall be in V!,tf ft approved grading plan 2. A soils mrAef3 tF@ Prepared by a qualiiitsd ilinova kartsod by the Stale of California to --��.— perform stich wof4s. ✓ 3. no dmk'Vmlert to*=ad lwit!0 tiro sot eroslon W"bourrd2f4es;a So%Dist!d9ance —/—f— Permsisrecjured.PigssaComm S;W County DopmrMofApftltuiaati714) 337-2111 for pernlit applicatba,Mgqft*nt"01SuChpartnat p9 UUWW toftCity j pntor to the tMi'=d IrAk-A"kV P@ffrdt., 4• A gsobi;W retlaN ebbs&&be preiaa.-ad by a5 eatalil�j eftgir sc or¢eel lyf and teal at - - -the tirng of appliwition for Vadtnq plan ram. 5. Tusti:nAIgra iingiatttsshagtecon0atedandapPVWPftrl*iman0sofImildingpermas sC-,a/rl 6. AS a custom-Wt Sutdivisiop,the following requirements sit2U o�.met: i �t a.Surety shall be posted and an agree ment executed guaranteeing completion of all on-s",t drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of tho Building , and Safety Divisfen prior tofinat map aWrovat and prior tothe issuance of grading permits. b.appropriate easemems for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels,are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety l)MWn prior to issuance of grading and b0e` permit:,, c.On-site drainage improvements,necessary for dowatering and pmte..iing he subdivided J--/— properties,are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage tiows seafaring, leaving,or within a parcel relative to which a building permit's requested, d: Final grading plane for of ch parcol-are to be submitted to the Buikf`tsg and Satet J—�--- Division forapprovai prno:to issuance of bulkfM a..a grading permits.(This may,oe on an incremental or c ompoeite basis.) e.All slope banks in excess of S feet in vertical height sW, be saaded with wAlve grasses —l—J orplantedwithgmundcovertorF;osioncertmI upon compiet'onofgmdln66r some other alternaivemetitodof erosion oontmi Shall bo complefid to the satt wllor,fot the Building Official.In addition a permanent ifrigmion system shall be gvvkded. This requirement does fmt release the aWicant/daysk"r IMM cornpiiam99.with the slope planting requi,remetds-al 56.^tion 117.06.0401 of the Devekpmeet Code. AppUCANTSPALLCOfAT#CTTHE SHOINEERINi3it3dtfGSION, (714)S83+ Sttfl2,FORCOWL."M VnT,4 THE FOLLOVANCs CONOrMNSt' L.Medlcmlon and tfahleularActos t Rights—at—way and easements shall be dedWA*dit0 tho C.N 10s 21 rower pttbtiG st'Alls, J� community trails,public pasecs,public tanciecviil€roar;,street trees,and public drainage facilities as showman the plans 2nW;r tsrfhathts mail. private saaQmenu for non-NM iacilfEies(crosc-,tze ;'aatap,local feeder traits,eta)sW be reserved as efwAi an the plant- and/or tentativemaip. 2. Datficafian shall be r,:ade of the ftYgawing irigfts-cf way ski the per3fi'we0 str+;is —J.;,.J_ (matured fmm strw nentarJlm): �.o�..pUi4tY �e�lr�-iCL �✓C � � Y�b'.rAe21�_f, ,,d:Nt �rirc;�.�✓�� sf�' L - _total ft't 0111 - to40".1eot on . f 3.ern irrevocabis offer ofdedicatlanlor W wide t0adwayte-mnsMkshr be made { �—t.— for all rrtNM S1r0CI 0t ddvu. J'u 4. Non-vettituW a=St sW b*deiieated t0 th9 CRy for thtl Wbl;?.tV slfWS:_,_ 5. Rec ,al acesss easements shag bo pmvk*d erfsurhV aceass to aH pa=13 by CC3Rs III of by do and Shall t a rewrdxi c>ift*cumsntty Arilh 0%crap or pffor to the issuiwnoe of f buildia",=p9t49titS,EYRere r0 n7ap a 4.,wlv0d. �/ �� V Irf� SC-214t eon r2 st 1� t�%�t1=•17 _ —6. Private drainage ease'lents for cross-Iot drainage stall he provided andshailbeC.hneated or noted on the final map; 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction area on the ':I neighboring lot adjoining the,zero lot line wall and�ntain the following language; 9/We 119reby.dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of(residentia)'iuildings(or other structures)within those areas designated on the map as.building restrict areas.' d maintenance agreement shall also be grantedfromeachlotto the adjacent lotthroughthe F 8. All existirg easements lying within tLjure rights-cf-wa'y sha!l be quitclaimed or delineated on the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks andlor street trees plardd outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the C wherever the encroach onto eY Y prfvat®pn�i'tY:- t� 10.Additional street right-of-way shall be dadi=ed along Vft tum lanes,to provide a minimum _ice_ of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs.If curb adjacen sidewala is used along the right turn lane:a parallel streetbu malnte,ance uasemsm shy be Esrovfded, �11.Thedev9lopershallmakeagoodfaitheforttoacqvfrother91TWredpff•04epropertyintsrests necessary to cinStfuct the required public Irmrovements,and s helsh¢abouidfall to do so, the developer shale,at least 120 days prio6o subrr.Rt;!l,416t?final n tp tar approval,enter 6 into an agreement to complete the impmvsmarits pursuant to 3overnrtient Code Section I. 664E2 at suO tinw as the City acquires the property irtter6cm itiquired forft Wiprovernams. Such agreement shall provide for payment by tfa developerof all cr>xe Irma lid by the City, to acquire the off-see property interests required In connection with the subdivision.Security for a portion of these costs shall be to the form of a cash depmmit in the amount pen in an appraisal report obtained by the developer,at devsiopara coat.The appraiser Mall eve been approved by the City prior to comffmicamem of the appta". M.Street ImprovoneaatQ ` I _1. All public improvements(interior stro ts,drain 1t facilities,community trralls,pasams, Jam— landscaped areas,etc.)shown an the plan stator iontatM map&deli be constructed to City Standards,. Interior stroll in;Mairnents XWr f ,but 8M not Nftdted to,curb and gutter.AC pavement,drive spXoscim.Sid`AvaM,West 1ghta,aW street trees. 2. A mfnimtm of 2G-fdot wi b pavement,wl?Plii a[40 toot wfe loft led rigf-d-wayshall be _j_t_ construcled IN all M149 eon sMis. 3. Constr iM ft, f orkaing porin- ter stria hnprovernarga ,but not Limed to: J CURD@ A.C. 509 ORME S IM11T ® 5[BEET NAA7� QV-MR PVKr WALK APM UGH75 YRMS TRAIL O f4tER SC-2/91 9of 12 r; �otas. (a)Median island includes landscaping and 1m;ation on meter. (b)Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determirad during pian(-;nock. ^t It so marked.side-' r w7ik shall be cu. ilinear per SS0.304. (d)If so marked,an i Ireu of constru^roan fee shall be provided for this _ . improvement pliirs and construct;cl): { �� a. Street improvement pian inckiding street trees and street 110MM,prepared by a ragisa tared Civil,Engineer,shalt be submitted to and 2pproved by the City Engineer.So%-.sty shalt be post►Sand an wjreemen',exectted to the saitsf.,tion of the City Enginees'and the City ARC.Vy guaranteeing oompie0on of the public andtor private street improve- ments.priorto final mno approval orlhe l3wonce of building perrnits,whiehever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being pertorrnee in public dght•e(-way,fees shall be paid and a rl.J censtruG'on permit shall be obtained from the Cki EnSineer's Office in addition to any other pernit r"ad. c. Pavement striping,ma.Aing,traffic,street name signing,and IntetSonrwa conduit _J_.J_ sha.t be installed to the satisfaction of the C?ty Engirmr. d. Signal conduitwithr,,rlboxes shall beinstalfad Aryrr6wconstrud4on&rsc=tructio.1 of rr�*r,secondary orcollector sirsem which iraaiptectwith other major,secondary or coilecior Weots tot future traffic signals.Pug boxes shkl be pkaced on bath sides at the street at3fee;m"ide of SCR,ECRoranyottibrbasti®rei appr+ovodbythe City Engineer. Was: (1)All pug boxes shag be No.6 union otherwise lect'iwthe Ct.�Engineer. e (2)Condit shag be 3-Inch galvanized st ell wAh pulfrope. ` e. Wheel chair ramps shah be butxlled on as four Comers of Inlersers'-.ns per Ctiy �--�- Standards or directed t)y the City Engineer:; J L, f. '. Existing City room"iring Construftri;shag remain open if tic ai 3g timed wish JJ_ adequate detours doting construction.A street eiloaure pamVt ,4y bo required.A cash` depood shall be provided c')v81 the Ca!!t of graft and Paving, ~shalt ba refunded upon c tion of the cwWLictbn to the k.n of the City Efginaer. 9. Concentrated EdasxxsRaaOfnot e sidowalrs.UrWsWftl caium;�`...a be J� 09WIled to Cky SS .except ter b&Ve fancy Iti h. H ae om ramp ti agn a A,b as sf A-1w by ft Cty Eitga"; i. S'traatnomshagbei ,xa+redbYtttsrCiryp1mierpriortoW*fflXtaltoriw*plan Chff*, _l_J— 5.Street impt-avemorit plans par Cit)r st&waras for an private strtustarbeprov4dgd for _1�J review and approval by the CRY Engine". P'rt¢rto am per[oM*d on the pri� vats streets, fees shaif bi paid and coneftction pemft Shag be ObWried fop►J the City Enders office in additbritc,any OHM permItta te4l2itt� , 6.Street trees,a minimurr,of 1"agan fide or lamer.SW in k4aifed per Ggy Standards in accordance with the City'nJareet this program. SC-'3/91 to or 12 ��/� 57, City Engineer 7.intersectich line of site designs shall here,�� edbylh adopted policy. a. On colt^.43pr or larger streets,lines of sight shall be piotied for all project intersections, `— including driveways.Walls,signs,and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight, t Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Loec,residW.Ial street intersections shall have their naticeability,improved,usually by moving tha 2•).!-Closest street trees on eachside away fromthe sireetarid placed M a street ® / tree easement. 8,A permit atfall be obtained from CAURANS for any we*within the following right-of-way: fuw�3/it.[ F�i �O 9.All public improvemenh.'on the following streets shall be operationally cornpiete prior to the issuance of building permits: 71 N.Public Maintenance Aron .A separate set of landscape and imgatlo:x plans por Engineering Public Works Standards J-1— shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval i or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.The foilaMn4 laindscttpe parkways, medians, a are required to be annexed into the landscape Maintenance Distri : � uaAr 4 f y.,W1zL ✓C °O 2.A signed consent and waiver form to join andlorform rite appropriate Landscape and UgVng _J_/— Districts shag b!t filed with the City Engineer ptfortdtinai map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first.Fomta ion costs strait be borne by lira dirNa4w. rs 3.All required pubKlLndscapLgart4lrtlgationoysams shall beconNrwousfy maintained bythe J—J— developer Vnthl accepted 6y tt;e City. le r" a.Parkway landscaping on on foltw kfig streegs)shag coot nin the results of the respeafea �1—J Beaute'lcatiort'Mager Plan: Q.DrOnage and FloW ConifM tD i. The project(or portions herW)is located within a Flood Hazard Iona:ftrefore,'flood J—J-- prOtmcaan MMUM till:A be provided as certified by a mgfe wW Ctd EngIrteer and apfY-aved*11he City ftttwt, 2.It shall be the detr lopafsM11poinibility to have the annnf FIRM Zone �J_J ® designation removed train the Waled area. The developer`s onglosar shall prgpaM ao necessary repo ttf.::�iis.and hydroiogWhydmulic caiculatbilis. A Conditional Letter of Map Re%isio. CLOMR)09 be ofthrw s from FEMA prlo:a final map ap6rittvat or issuance^d iitding p err i ts,whichever occurs Sv.A Letter of Map Revision(LOMR)shall :*w@d by FEMA prior to Oemparicy of htTrctvnmeht aooWance.whictwor occurs tiMt ?� 3.A final drainage study shad be submitted to"4Axa-ed by the CityEr4pesr pefw to final P map approval or the is stands of building permits,wh►t'ver occurs first. All drainage facilities shah be installed as required by the Chy Ettgir`t+scr. SC-2191 d.A permit from the County Flood Control Distriet is re i9 y ``" II p required for work its r ,n oft=vYa . ,A S.Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pip,,, , - measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk s Publ'c stone dr tin easements shall be graded to convey ovenlowslr the ev.I2 of a blockage In a sump catch basin on t"public street, P.Utlllilas t.Provide separate utility servers to-each parcel inckr&g san::ery s e+� raga system Water, gas,electric power,telephone,and cable TV(alt underground)in aocor-0ance wKh the tatitity �► Standards.Easements shall be provided as r6quired: 2.The developer shall be responsible for thi'rebcaflon of existing utilities as 3,Wateranr!�.iverplans shalt be designer and i�natnrcted to meet the requirements of the J Cucamonga County Water District(CCWD),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distr ct, and the Environmental Headh Departma;"ct!h^County of San Somard o.A letter of � comPlianca from the CC,WD is required prior to final map approval of issuamee of perrrlts, whichever occurs first,t1 Q.General P,�qulrements and Approvata 1,The5BparataparCaiscoMainadwithin the Pntj6dbau:idariashallOeiageltycombined into JJ one parcel prior tr.issuance of building,psm*s. .7 2.An easement for joint use driveway sha!i be p�svided pr;-r to final map appaa�al or _J_! issuance of b'rildlng permrs,wheleveroccurs fits fcd 3.Prior!o approval of the final trap a depasif.shdM be posted with the City coverirgl the «_ estimated cost of apportioning the wiesai6erft under AssossmW Dlstrt l among the newjy created parcaw. 4.EtiwandafSar Sevaine Area ReVonal Mal Ir&*,S mndwy Regional,and M.Vt,,c Pia Drainage F"�sttafl bC paid t istirsal map app<tiva!or prrort�OuNdutg�rmit issualx?r if no map is involved. S,Permits shelf be obtak*MV't ffi' W';d�'`uring 80�ertcles Wwwk witilin fhdir right-of-ways 6.A Si ;, and firer tomi fs JCdrt sncdoa loom ,ie t ear Enfar w&nt Co=wn"* J__J_ Fadraift D1Wd dig be ftkid with ile Cloy star to ifela7 atop applmial a.�the t°.Wince oR6u lr+O penrlfs.wtidwer o=nl lick ronttatim ems aw r A 0orrw by the 7.Pnor to fingntion of J* any deeraksp;nsfa RftasrJ s imp�ovement plain tih29 be com- plated beyond fire phaso boundizeAs to aSSvt;a. secettdary:oi�eaaand-d�ir?cgapref®ciionte � the satiafactiortot the City Ertpktaer.Pha3e ixrundeaies shy Cartdiiap", to jot ch*wn I On the appmed Native map. 'x-2/91 12of'12 r 06t14-e1951 Fp0{7 9UST2N FOUST p550C. TO 23320T p.g2 TPilr F�f/ST.+� fRA FF1C E1147 l-VEERING A0,1 fI►RKJ pop rA r ION 2020 NWITH TUSTIN AVENUE SANTA A%a, 4ALIFORNIA 02701 TELEPHONE(714)667-04§4 FAX(714)6674052 MBWTQ AAlDUM TO: Mr.Dan PUGS,The plies Companies FROM. Joe Foust,PE SMECD FOOTE=MARKET I A,CLTRAFFIC STfdD}< DATE: June 14,1991 8 DrMODUCTION In January 1990, Aua.:a-Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) prepared a traffic study titled 'Co nlcrce?'arkwav C^nte, Traffic Ansh sic":or Ile Plies Companies re-riling development and access fcr the propc4-east of I-IS between Foothill,Heulevard asr3 Arrow M#wxy; In November 1990 ?he 3CCitk Companies pm pared a Ytafl3e study;or portion'0f th,san area tid 'Traffic ;ysis Stutiv r Foothill l�ftt ace. and w LV<ie mvimcd that study os.;our oehrlE This Memo sumizzarizes,our coi& ts. t� AFri's onSaki� AIVAL��S• -:;-md si9'of access and chcul deli. -?the study area included four (4) 1 alternatives two of s It involved north4outh ci culation through the site connecting FOO&U, Borlevard with Arnow'Hkhway and two which did not includi dLmugk..access. Ilia finding and recommendation ok our sWy was that a plan whkh provided ihis no'rth-south conamdon provided a nett circulation systes i 'gnat study wanton to rmmmend an aPpro riawrjoss-se�jo;for the coz=c t r roadway(`- tix ..ommerce Parkway). Tu addition, that,rtoammendatiov,placed the igaalized in*arse otn' r'otbm Uotni moat the location rcquhmd by the Foothill Specific Plaa Our review o,:'a Foothill Macke lsice �affic Stu dy udy indicg.=a relatively ec_rough effort was undeataken,but u<�limits of the Study,wero confined. ;=s5 an exarnple,in the remarks on Page I.the report Mates,Me project,can have access&oin two sides only,n attcl EtEvanda.. It is clear this study did not eammin.the impact Eof direct acaxss oa this site,or adjacent Praaerty to Arrow FTighway or couv+4Y the Ij ed access tay devebpment directly to :he south th;ougk their e aim to FOotkill'Bot&,vad.- +!g b .*+cvh..-; :ng the stud)r,I find that it � -basi~,alty uses a co�atsmal tcaff�-, en&wrkut 19,491 P,C. , AGEtM'l 'N 0 Ol 0 2 , ,,J E, of, I hm' L'3,7 L. Lldv'av,: jt-KQI7 %U!xtici r'.uLf�I 44s`Su{.. ,1 Mothcdology in axcssing project impacts and,in fact,touch of its analysir�is based on the Cucamonga TirdMr-Mil(RC TM)prepared by AFA. Tie study s =so justify"its conclusion that the main entrance on Football Fsouttvard newels to be relocated.ftom that'specifaed in the FSP based on its suitability to lyrice Club. study fitrtb Jacknowledgcs on Ygge:1 brat the.aax t restriction(two side Only); alo g with". .the requkentrn ts`of committed.major teMts( Val-2Vdad and Pries;Club]were factors in, terminiag that the signal heeded to be relocated. M.farther indicates the study did not concern itself vitaccess toAOM U-tow Hi h Family,a small point,but one I think demonstrates that the desires of brie major zeaamts were a substantial factor Influencing the Marketolaca traffic study is dctnonstrateci by the arguments Justifying left turn aWAM at vil=heart's tusst t`gnatiY.ed driveway. t?n Page ZZ;the study staa,ex,'Dual left-turn lanes are iffipraclical at cgmmzrclal driveways.. This statement is untrue. Dual hsfc tiara lasesat signalimd entrap=to shopping oentem are aomauonoliccl;Jh fact,the ct-m-sectionP'fes gtr" recommended by AFA;for Commerce Parkway has two enter;Mane&which could occommodaie dual westbound left-tarn Ianes from p'ootW Soulevaad.:It appears that this 4aterueat'ls t cvBalc arguttzsa! attempting to justify instaltimg anasfditionai l�-,turn lane turd median break at the val--Mart driveway. COI►dMS1014 It appears that;the Marketplace traffic study, although fotfav ing a convendomws traffic engineering methodology was�fy limited in its scope that dtt > w t raider the,named fo,,or benefits of direct a �to/from MAV Highway 1 t „ � Cl � t 4 TOTRL P.N3' s 11,T H. E K I T H C 0 M P A iN` P/o/lt+neg-G!M(Engm�mr/r.£{imrvnmenraf Srrr;Srs.AR�'IfKfuR•ZNfd'fOpe'i1KblKSId�Y-Lo/IdSJ/r;Y)Ytlg C y August 18,1988 D9i D-061,. Mr.Russet Maguire ? City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Baseline Rd. ` ! Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730' 1 1S Re:'Tentattve Tract No. 9326: ow"t Mr.Maguir'n: i8 in our meeting olo Monday-, August 19, 1988,you informed our client; Mr.'Dan Plies, that Tentlttive Map No ,9328 could not be approved until .the circulation pyttene in the 4idustrial Specific :Plan and the Foothill Specific Plan had.+eert amended: Ws are hereby regjesting ttya city to bagin this process. Any effort th2t�M1 the city ,could make'�W expedite this a`�endment will Ba appreciated. Our client would like to,fee a road that extends from Arrow Highway to Foothill / Blvd. �. we are enclosing a pain that shows our preferred alignment, We think that this alignment will bene rt the future projects,in our immedla,e vicinity. c we will also*be'availaiile to the city staff to discuss the affQcts of any alternate solution on our�RIroject. Thank you for your coopa?�Ition on this matter 4 Sfnc®ratty, � THE:IdE M COMPANIES-SAi�c11EGO,:WC. 1 j •~ ' Thomas C.Carmody,PE ,( Director of Engineering h. TCOtac } 910l00B ses3osseana,�.,r.na•iogsa.nr.�;upiuite�js3soc�a .�114rea fgt6t drtse Petw4& Rlc+nfrde Rbedlendf!'lii. ov, i,�•ah p. r�u��fit �'t'�, ',, �r J per ogt3."' (� r� r� �r"N!}�h,i�• t'R, i 4°rt� W XS ' '. iLit tL �3rxj(V"�=iGb4j.� i �"•76Y "y;,f.�Lr+,s� r ,t�) 3ei4 r msM�r � n3dj In � 'jt�' aGriy�ti p }v� �'[f'y 1 ,�'F` :ir}i '-^••� t;\ �a .. O .,,.�„ t;� .�t1 •i 7S1y41 y �i7`as yy t rti,,+ .f f '{4'ti'� O o A' V4 a( y��y i rc1$l it i, a• a a 'ry�#�.,.1 �'2hv Too ,� t<f7�.{!Y'il.,r `4•Cy � r:�t \ ?.+into' .S �� ta v u^�Y i ..... `\f .. .. ... .. ..... as LL r,flJldlf; r u �F F t F r: �n t.ZA 6 9�ah.4 DEVELOPERS-REALTORS-INVESTMENTS April 12, 1991 I Mr. pau].A. Rougeau Rancho Cucamonga Development' (Traffic Enginser) 9320 Baseline 3Zoad P.Q. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Air. Rougeaus i IRy daughter_ Debra and I enjoyed speakiiig with you last Wednesday evening. As I mentioned, the traffic study Z left with you (which was 'prepared by Austin-Faust Associates .in January, 1990) resulted from a-meeting that was held at the City on November 30, 1989. At that meeting,,there were several items discussed, one of the significant items being traffic patterns for our proposed development. The persons attending the meeting incl`�Ided Jack Lamb (City Manager), Rick Gomez (Community Development Director), Russ McGuire (then City Engineer), £__-id Buller (city Planner), Don Womack (our Builder), Bruce NAuner (cur Architect./Land Planner), Ken Linville (our Civil Engineer) and myself and my daughter Debra. The purpose of t?te_meeting was to discuss various items concerning a proposed master plan for the property at the South*crest corner of Foothill'Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue, of which we own a part. We had been having some difficulties with our planning, in part because of the City's inability to give us ® clear direction on wb:., , they wanted for a traffic plan. Eventually, at that N61hember 30 meeting, we were told by the City officials that we should engage a reputable traffic engineer to perform a traffic study for the entire project and that the City would adopt whatever recommendations resulted from the traffic study. The City suggested that we retain Austin-Faust :AssociatEs tto°do this study and, following a meeting which we had with-Mr. Faust.on, December`4, 1996, we did so. The Austin-Faust report, 'a 22706 Azpa;K St.,Suite 701,Lake Forest-El Toro,California 92630 Telephone(714)770.1633 ..fit � • s - DEVELOPERS-REALTORS-INW-STMENTS ® Nr_,,,Paul A. Rougeau April 12, 1991 Rage 2 copy of which'I delivered to you last.Wednesday, was the result of that study. We have dlways believed, and have.acted and planned accordingly, that the traffic-scY:^^te xecommended by Austin-Faust ,would, in fact, be adopted by the City. We have done so in reliance upon w4it we were,told at, the,;November 30:, 1989 meeting, . Immediately, -after we received the traffic study; Ken Linville delivered a copy to Russ McGuire and I delivered one to. Rick Gomez, I,-was shocked to learn that you had never seed ' the study until we gave it to you on -Wednesday. The cost to us' of having the study prepaa�ed was $9,00o. (.f We shall be happy tt �meet with you at your: ceanvenien'e in order to discuss this matter further. Ve ru y rYo ,i G ` Daniel Ld Pies cc; Ken Linville Dan Womack Cameron Pi. Smith, Jr., Esq. Bruce Mauner, Creative Environs y u f 4 22706Aspan St.,Suite 701,Fake Forem,El 7bro,Californi¢9f630 Wr bhonr(714)77071633 Draft COMMERCE PARKWAY CENTRE Tm&,e Analysis +` Prepared for,` The Plies Compaties Prepared by- Austin-Foust Associates,Inc. 1450 North Tustin Avenue,Suite 108. ® Santa Ana,California '92701 1 �.1 i� January 31,1990 77 a CONTENTS AbM Page I. INTRODUCTION Project Description I-1 Definitions I-1 tt References I-3 II- PROJECT SETTINGS- Surrounding Highway Network R_1 Edsting and Background Traffic Conditions <' II-1 III. T1t�kMC R"ACT ANALYSIS Trip Generation Traffic Impacts <} III-6 IV. RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX -t L INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a traffic analysis performed for the proposed development of Commerce Parkway Centre'in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The report;has been prepared for submittal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in support of the application for the project site.. PP24CT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is located on the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill ® Boulevard. Figure I-1 illustrates the location of the project site. Four site plan alternatives!cave 1� been developed which would develop the 96.62 acre,site with a mixture of office, commercial; "restaura;tt, and warehouse use.:. Access to the development wiU be provided along; Foothill Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Arrow Highway. Two of;thc:alternatives provide an internal roadway connection between Foothill and Arrow Highway parallel to the Devore Freeway. The traffic analysis examines the impacts of adding project generateu<<traffo,_to the background traffic on the surrounding arterial network. Consistent with the format used for environmental impact reports,'the traffic analysis material'pressnted here is set out as follows: _! Chapter H Project Setting P J g Chapter III Project Impacts Chapter IV-Potential Mitigation Measures Detailed analysis results are also contained at end of the report as technical appendices and referenced in the text where appropriate. DEFINMONS Certain terms used:throughout this report are defined below to clarify their intended meaning. i, H C II NLLSipE j S YI.SLI BANTNI SUYUT um � rercara 1 NSIA OII.RQI HJROI ' Y Vu[q F^`. e4 AAWf ��Y rm 9 PROJECT LOCATION ,m s�mmuaxva m�Aw "wire 1-1 eICNITY MAP 7wa z_2 v Background Traffic Estimated trafficwolumzs`on thc.,arte��al system before the addruon of project generated traffic:' ADT-Average Daily Traffic. t; ICU-Intersection.Capacity Utilization. A factor used to measure the volume-to-eapaaity, ratio for an intersection and determine the level of service.'-' 1 LOS-Level of Service. A scale used to ev,Iuate circulation,system performance based on intersection ICU values or volume/capacity ratios of arterial segments. The levels range from"A" to "F," with LOS "A' representing free flow traffic and LOS ".c representing severe traffic congestion. Peak Hour This typicall -refers to the hour during the AM peak period(typically 7 AM- 9 AM)or the P'M peak period(typically 3 PAI-6 PM)in which thergreatest number of.vehicle . trips are generated by a given land use or are travelling on,a.given ILdway. 1 VPD Vehicles per Day. This has the same meaning as ADT but is generally used in a trip generation context rather than in reference to the highway volume of an arterial segment. ITH-Vehicles per Hour. V/C-Volume-to-Capacity Ratio. typically described as a percentage of capacity utilized by existing or projected traffic on a'segment of arterial or an intersection turn movement.> REFERENCES 1. 'Rancho Cucamonga TraffieModelDatabase,"Austin-FoustAssociates,January 1990. a� S-3 `,•,• II. PROJECT SETTING' il , This chapter describes the project site in relation to the transportation setting. The existing circulation system is discussed,and existing and background traffic volumes and levels of service are summarized, SURROUNDING HIGHWAY NETWORK ; t Traffic generated by the proposed project will primarily access Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Hiig'nvay. Foothill is a four-lane east-west arterial currently c,trying 29,OGO vehicles per day in the project vicinity. Arrow Highway is a two-lane facility currently carrying 9,000 vehicles per day in: ` the vicinity of the project.' Regional access to the project will be provided by the Devore Freeway(I-15). A full service interchange is located along Foothill immediately west of the project site. EXISTING AND BACKGROUND'TRAFFIC CONDITIONS existing AM and PM peak hour intersection turn volumes at kP«-r=,sections were counted �f in Janua y 1990,by Traffic Data Services,Inc. These existing AM and PM peak hour turn volumes are illustrated in Figure 11-1. Background traffic volumes were determined from the Rancho Cucamon"s Traffic Medal(i`:2111)for the.year 1996(see Reference I in Chapter I). ,"igure U-2 illustrates background AM and PM peak hour volumes. 0 ® Existing and background intersection lane configurations are presented in Figure II-3,and intersection capacity utilization(TCU)values are presented in:Table U-1 (actual ICU calculations are included in the appendix). The ICU values are a means of representing peak hour volume/capacity ratios,with a value of.90 represent ng the upper threshold capacity for level of service(LOS)'-D." As the table indicates,all intersections operate at an acLIeptable level of service under the existing;and background conditions. w 40 85 558--Y i 28 FOOTHILL +j a-i158 `J 650--► pA i 10 0 yS� a-1382448 z Q uj QQ j ARROW IMY 10 • d— 102 91 �i 250 41 4-a-1037 1161 —t' W/I as 3707,. _ mQ +9- 651 FOOTHILL 43 1223--► 76"4;p.0 1 i. 73 QO N3-*- �. 4r 8fi4-►bo I boN !- 41 ARROW HWY 115 x 38 355-► 4111 126 T�o�n I� RM Figure 11-1 EXISTING PEAK HOUR COUNTS AlISFI�FOIaSFASS�'!ei'.t :dW' `�w II-2 0--j, t7X�lN J mci t 227' FOOTHILL 1 140 _ 196-1p .L 32 4-527 ,¢ 248 • Off. � na 1/ rN t 188 ARROW HWY �� c-170 t6 t1}" 247-► 61 "i o AAA P 836 t 192 1506 i.. 444�. nn� t 151 FOOTHILL �a �-218 18 114 468-a 68--;b, m t 119. Z 421 a 1323�a 3 4r 276-b 1 F O pi nm t 279 ARROW HWY �t� �- 164 35 4 4[' ..gym PM Figure 11-2 BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR VOLUMES flb4 ASSOCMIFS,AM AM II-3 1' J f s I FOOTFNI n z h ARROW HWY EXISTING N y, o � z 3 ® t i� ARROW HW BACKGROUND Figure 11-3 EXISTING AND BACKGROUND R,LANE CONFIGURATfONS +iffSTUST.OSSOClATEr � TI 4 > t c� �'Pable IPA -o BACKGROC7ND'Y;ONDYTIOiS{ICiI S[JIv]IvfttRY + E}CtS I1NG a$At ORMNO �INFERSECITON AM itM ATE PM �i'1 ".115 SB�Footh0l .43� 41 TT �d. 4T 2 1.15 NB&Foow'II'. ,TS 8B 44 . 40 3.\l:ttarnn �Footlulf S7, ^2 S3 �k'$ 4'Erman"A Arrtnv Hwy; A6 ,4-5 . A - TO Nate: Leve,of Service ranges .'00 Ob4 .61 070 g 71 0.80' C,: Ck' till= D till�1.00 E Above 1.00 F 1 �l III. PROJECT IMPACT ANALYSIS This chapter describes the potential impacts of the p opcsed development upon the surrounding arterial network. Traffic generated by development of the proposed projc, t is added to the existing and baclgto;tnd volumes presented in the previous chapter and the resulting capacity 71 impacts are assessed. TRIP GENERATION As discussed in Chapter i,the proposed project consists of 95.62 acres which wall be developed with a mixture of office,commercial,restaurant,and warehouse uses. Appropriat,trip generation rates for the proposed development were derived from the RC1M. Table III 1 summarizes these trip rates and the trip generation for each of the development alternatives. Il �U Alternatives A and B include an internal roadway which provides a connection between Foothill and Arrow Highway. Alternative A,which is illustrated in Figure III-1,consists of a total of 938,650 square feet and generates 45,395.trips daily,of which 1854 will be generated tin the AM peak hour and 3763 will,,.,be generated in the PM peak hour.,Access -MU be provided at one entrance along Foothill,two entrances along Etiwanda,and thr^`-entrances along Arrow Hwy. c Alternative B provides an aetdYional roadway connection fti r da to the main internal roadway. Access along Foothill,Etiwanda,and Arrow Hwy remain the same as Alternative A This alternative consists of"934,950 square feet which generate 46,920 trips da_'y,of which 2,041 trips will be generated in the AM peak hour and 3,828 will be generated in the PM peak hour. Figure.III-2 illustrates the Alternative B site plan. Alternatives C and D eliminate the internal rd.''wag connection from Foothilll to Arrow Hwy in order to discourage trucks from using the rr',dway as a shortcuf to and from the Devote Freeway. Tbiz configuration creates a separation between the office:w-warehouse uses I in the soutbemportion;nf the project and the commercial and restaurant uses to the north. Alternative C consists of it'mtal of?!!14,900 square feet and is illustrated.in Figure III-3: Access;is provided by one entrance or, Fo Lt='t wo entrance=on Etft=da, and two entrances on Arrow Hwy. As the above refereniF a taG gates, iltis alternative;generates 39,578 trips daily, of which.1,453 M1 will be generated dt ring ttie AM peak hour and 3,599 will be genera!-1 during 1he PM�.ak hour. J Tabte III-1'• ' WINIt RCE 9FIAKWAY'CBN L7�t1RIF GFWERAT10j',SUMMARY c i AM PEAK 1-TOUR f,.Pries PEAK lioUR= LAND USE: LZVITS ID OI3• -1bTAL tO• OR,,;TOT.Al ADT' 1bp Geoerxtion Rates RegionalCotttmercial TSF SO 22 , 72 142 1.60 302 34.40 Restaurant TSF .82 09 tit9t 500 225 7.2. 9562 Fast Food Restaurant.:TSF � 2742 c79 84 1694 1630 32& 63Z13 Research&Develoent :_;TS I :1?m F 1.13 i '_ •r`�:1R :IS 84 .99 6;d�z.,, i F Bank TSF 4.97 qY8 8;15 $:00 11.11 ZO�D I89195 Theatre. Seat Ol': .500 Ol 24 U26 3i76 �I Warehouse. TSF M. .16 .57 .58 :98. 1.56: US ® Trip Geaeration � AJ.emaiiveA Regional Commercial 716.80 TSF 359 I58 -S16 J1018 YIv =:.5. 24,658 .restaurant 34,447 W "3 ' 31 17: • '77 249, 3,289 ®s Fast Food Restaurant 18.66) IF 503 SW1W 305 293 599 11,378 aro5 RLse &Development 104.11 1F 119 12 130"�' .16 88 104 638 Bank - IQ?t," •tF+.�'. 98 63 161 179" 219 39tt 3742 � Theatte. oa y . 10 0 10 't30 19 249. 1,690 . TOTAI. 1 r! R l 1,115 .739 1954• 1920 f 4A3 3,703 45 395 Alternative B Rep onal Commercial 716.80' TSF 358 158 SI 5 1.018` 1,147 2 265: 24,CS8 Restaurant, 2716 'TSF� 2Z 2 - 24 l66 61 197 2,681 Fast Food Restautant 660-11 .6W 1200 365_ 35V 715 13 9! (� Research&Development 1041IS TSF 118 12 130 14 88 l /. Bank 19.70' TSF 98 63 16i 179' 219 398° 3,742. Theatre:: <460"Seals 10 0 10 230 19 249 1�90 ' 't TOTAL 120E 835. 204E 1444 1,884 3,828' 46X0 Attem�a ^rive C- .r E.. Regioaal Comserciaf v3q 60 r '1F 232 I46 4T8' 944 1,063 . 2 007 22 EG2 Restaurant , 29.60 TSF- 24 3' 27 14S 67 22S` 2,830 Fast Food Restaurant 9.00 TSF 2SY 251 SGZ 253 147. 300 $p Research'&bevebpment, 12150 TSFi. i44 14. 158I I9 107 126' ws-, Bank 27.90` TSF• 139 .89 '228 2S4 310 564: 5�w Th�tte �..960- 5rats Y0. ;0 10 23C,, 19 flA9� Warctouge '883 TSF. 34 '16. SO :j. 87 138; 432 TOTAL 934 514 1,453 _799' 1800. 3599;;, 39,578 Attern_ a _tine D Regional Commercial 653.00 TSF 326 144 470 9Z7 5�,1045 1,972 22463 Restaurant 33.60. T5F 32 3, 35 193- 8 280 3;691 ' Fast Faod Restaurant 9.00 TSF tl ,75i 25I,` 502 1S3 14T 300 5689 Rom-TA&Development 12750 TSF. 144.• 14 158 19 107 v; 126 776 Back 27.0, 'TSF' 139 89 226" 254 310 564 5 00 _Theatro 960 Seals 10 0 10 230 19 249' 1,690.. Warehoux. 8930 ZSG' 34 16. SO' Si 87 133: 43i TOTAL: 434 SIT '1;453;` 1,82`i 1802 '629 10,040 111-2 914 lot I i I VIEW ORFMG gn I s o :� I P14 I •;�; F! we lili ( Vann� eD�._,f — ROM I Fit Nk LIM 8 �S qq � � w a ui �\ �`�•t \ � �', # �a; ill G i a + D 19 1. �; p (�I; a I� �I •� N" IBM all x "l , 9E I;, LIWy Ii j b„101, I w \el m� all Q III a t , ri gas, �e 40 4 z ® � �� � - i it � • , F I� Is < , ISMI rh W F li�il N E-4 l� 5 -Y 0 •i�� F+Oa Ono 1lr , R arIMAMlil . 44 at.+ I J: ilil ' a , \ Illil' r t III—kJ r , i Alternative D provides two additional right-turn only driveways along Foothill. The site plan for Alternative D is illustrated in Figure I 1-4 ".Ss•s alternative consists of a total of 991,300 square feet which generates 40,040 trips daily oiwhich'1453 will be generated during the AM peak hour and 3629 will be generated during the Ply[peak hour. Distribution of project-generated traffic was i derived from RCTM travel patterns in the vicinity of the project site. Figure III 5 illustrates the routes assumed for travel to and from the project site. Project generated intersection volumes for the AM and PM peak hours for each alternative are illustrated in Figures III-6 through III-9. TRAFFIC IMPACTS 1, IIProject-generated traffic was added to existing counts and to the background voluml presented in the previous chapter to derive existing-plus and background-plus-project AM and PM;leak hour volumes. Existing-plus-pr:,;ect and background-plus-project ICUs for the four development alternatives are summarized in Table 111-2. As this table indicates, there is no, significant difference in the impacts caused by Alternatives A and B. Similarly, there is no significant difference in the impacts caused by Alternatives C and D. However,Alternatives C and D have more of an impact on the intersections of Etiwanda at Foothill and Etiwanda at Arrow Highway than do,Alternatives A and B. Ta-bwIII-2 SAcxoROUND-PLUS-PnoJELT icu sUMI:f ay' ALTERNATIVE A ALTERNATIVE It AVERNATIVE C AI LTERNAMM D INTERS{i L ^N AM PM AM PM } A7vt PM 4M PM �:. Eustine-Ptusa�ruicef �.!r� �I 1.;I15 SB&Foothill 34 Z.I-iS NB'R Foothilt 96! 131 84 Imo° S4 128• 3, Etiwandir&Foothill .68 85 d4 Bd x 64 I15• 64 t16• 4..Etiwanda&Atrow'Ilwy .53 .61 .53 .60 ,63 10 „.63 .7D Backmund-Plus-Prolect 1 �i IF I.15 S13.&`Foothill it3 ' .63 83` 63 $L .62 82 .62 2:1.15 N8&Foothill S4 ,72 6i. 72 Sd( 7i! S6 AL 71 A:Etiwanda'. Foathil S4 .69 44� 68 95! 4, EuuanLa&Aii,,*Hwv g11 77_, -,Ss• TII-6 ' 1 I.'ii OI �i.. Ill;f~ RII lI QQy I II�I� w `. t ' , D ' a iiif. FC •II � i IJ a- •I I l iowumif4 Q •lii � W d� -�iii MAZ5, 1 , I;i; 0: 9M 1 j I 0 1 I II% �zo lk •1 If,' — to..a .III I , I C I 1 1 L 1 I if I I _ I ZSi-7 Ism IN z e•tr�. wwor 5 10% 10% 20% a 10% 15% 25% % �M SAN8WUR0a:0 Y 5 nwa oce,[ ® N1T. � ` VAiIEV ® A - •ail\ Figure III-5 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION " Al68T�f+sF�,>rASSOl,�TfS,4Y� IIi—$ A' 185 W L+ 148 FOOTHILL r 148 31,5 1 k �333 `\ 50-3 0_!'`a,j 335-- 24 7, 4r s I:I Y�t 74 ARROW HWY 23-►,fil j AM c N 036914 GFOOTL 1LL. -255 164Ld 1056'i �. 116184 fi P 830 61 1p. 10 o m Q� -f � 129 ARROW HWY {6p 288.S 12 1 fi I 55- PM Figure 11I-6 PROJECT GENERATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES i �dLE✓''r �lC6r.iS8liCL9 ALTERNATIVE A zrz—+1 ,l a� t` o^ Z I t 209 Yoe167 W 241--► - e oD vp 4_ 0 80 FOOTHILL ,-161 A� 4—41 663 �1 3-#W 83 -4-p 376 55-? �O h - 362 O Off, � ro YY t 3 72 ARROW HWY �N p 0 ,61 1• 22� ,fa 23 Z�Na •�e AM 0z N 011 3 Z � Map i� o \ FOOTHIi ,�260 �� 64 , dh— ',,1,1070 119 f 1 15-7 0m L 188 75 �4r 584--l- m coo a.- vQ L 39 116 ARROW HWY � *-- So 292'_!1 15._9' f,A 49-i. 1 49---y, mto PM an Figure 111-7 `) PROJECT GENERATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .lPl3TI fOUST.i88�CY.e1TgS,lei: ALTERNA-RVE B III-10 J„ Off. Z II `� 130 F 187-� 0-� V t— o FOOTHILL - 252 t 89 39 1 160 1 N^ 1 10 t 234 26.S k 28,10 13 7 x V ` o cc" t 20 �4 t 116 ARROW HWY �� '- 20 &2J 90J t� 4-.► �4"ir(rm�m10 i - _ - AM. 00m 3 �� 11((�L 450 Y Yam-360 - w 360-► 0--;k" ONO !- 0 1J5 FOOTHILL .c- 571 1 45 135-J ' Nm 272-i.mcN N O� fD�f ` W 4_.180 95 0 ! c rtV 540-P AEGD m N.l N !_.80 10 P � 46 ARA10W HWY' �i ~g 0 24J 332J tl 29-fo 1 10 PIS! Figure III PROJECT GENERATED PEAK HOUR'VOWMES All.'3rjy-FywrAsso&AFzs Am ALTERNATIVE,C A III-11 Q w r�f 103 w 167--►. . t 0 FOOTHILL c-253 99 453 36 -i 4 r' I 60-► f 232 26_?� _. { 13 �44 28��► ON. ^lVN L 19 tt6 ARROW HWY 20 62-0' 90 4 AM o N 4A 45, W i-350 365-i 0 7, Fi n t a !- 138 a FOOTHILL r 584 45 � 4BOZ p 1 I 135-> *,n 1 Hm 273�ama'.. my Jo t 180 - 54 .h r' o ,a al 0 r 4 46 ARROW HWY '- 10 24-? _ 329-► t.� 10-4,a,o 7 ;1 Pm Figure 111-9 s PROJECT GENERATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES At6TS--fVl ST'ASSOCWTFS,AW-1 ALTERNATIVE D III-12 IV. REC016IMENDATIONS The proposed proc ject will,generate from 39,578 to 46,920 taps daily depending i'. 5.. development plan chosen. Alternatives A and B will provide utter circulation throughout the if project site than Alternatives C and D,with Alternative,B being the preferred plan Althouglf Alternative B produces the highest trip generatioc of the four alternatives, the`impacts at the intersections studied are not significantly higher than those impacts caused byAlternatives A,C and D. Signs indicating that the internal roadwag is not a truck route, hould be placed .along the roadway to prevent the road from becoming a short cut to the freeway for trucks in the area. ram} I l I x r l i IV-1 APPENL►T'X ICU CALCULATION SHEM a -II t e f a 1 .. A J �i I1HTE_BSECTI0N CAP_ACZTY UIILIZ,AT19N A.4ALVS15 gd C W.,f: Rancho Cucasonaa SWd9 H/S Street: 1-15 59 Ramps Elk Street. foothill "Blvd 4 .. !f Volume Conditions Existing+ Alternative.A At Peak Hour Volumes :to _ed Cedification. bone IExisting.Conditions) Sackaround Cumulat BACYSROUK, Project TOTAL TOTAL Feak BACKGROUND Perk +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic Vic xisting Proposed Hour V/C Hour d/C Hour Ratio Ratio Maven€nt Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume WE Lanes n/Prop Lanes 0 _ 0.00 # Q 0.00 t 0.90 t �r fIL 0 0 0 , ,0.00 t 'IT` 0 0 0 0.0,0 0 ' 0.00_ 0 m- "1.00 yR- fi 0 D 0.00 0 4.D1_ 0 J.06 0.00 1 0 1118 0.00 - 0 0.00 nz- 0.00 0.00.' Sf` 3,200 3,200 0 0.12 1 0 0.i2 S 4 SR 0 0 531 0100 0 . 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL o , 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 . 0 0.06 t 0.00 I ET 3,200 3,200 5H Q.17 0 0.17 223 0.24 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 511 0.32 0 0,32 0 0 0.32 0.00 NL 0 0 0 b,OD 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 kT 3,200 3,zn 985 91331 f 0 O'a11 Y 148 0.35 0100. HR 1 600 1,600 440 0 2B S 0.2B 1B5 0.33 4 0.0,3 3 v ICU= 0.43 0.45 0.54 0,00 LOS= A A 9 A Notes: a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. b)'LOS=Level Of Service. -)Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane low 1A Project Ndr,'er, 289.001 talc.Date- 01122110 i U & 1NTERSE'CI10N' GAPAC``i`IY U' 3ZA'I1 0 N AN.4 Yq'13 f, City of: Rancho Cuc monga` ?t/S Street, 1-15 SB Ramps t/4 Street: Fouibil£Blvd` Volume Conditions: Existing+Alternative A PH Peak Hour Proposed NcdiTication: None (Existing Con4 tions) ` r Background Cumulat .BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL € Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V/C Existing Proposed Hour !C Hour V/G Hour Ratio Rat, J Moveetnt Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume wlExist Lanes wlProp Lanes �` II '+L C 0 10 0.06 1.. 0 >> 0.00 0 0.00 t 0.00 t y li 0 0 0 0.00 0 0:00 0 0.00 0.00 F. v 0 0 0;00 0 0.00, 0 0.00 c.00 'L 0 0 IN 0.00 0 0.00 192 0.00 ,1.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.05 # 0 0.05 t 0 0.09 # 040 t + SR 0 0 '79 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00"; 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 0 Mo 0 0 40 u.a0 [ `cT 3,200 3,200 1161 0.36 t 0 0.3b t 384 0.48 # 0.00 t ER 1,600 1,600 370 0.23 0 0.23 .0 0.23 0.00` kf dL 0 0 _0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t Y 4T 3.200 3.200 1037 0.32 4 0.32 369 0.44 0.00 i, OR 1 ,;'0 ',600 2$0 O.lb 0 0;16 461 0.44 0.00 ICU= 0.41 0.41 0.57 0.00 LOS= -A A A A Notes: �® al Asterisk. M indicate= critical movement. hl LDS=Level Of Service. C) Base traffic volumes source; TRAFFIG DATA SERVICES, INC. 1 Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane j u PFA Pro jectNumber 289.001 Ca1c. Date:, 0£122l90 t y Fyk 17 1NTfR6EC7;-l911 ,CAPACITY U' TIL17ATIO A4ALYSIS u City of: Rancho'Cucamonoa W$Street. 1-15 NB Ramps EIN Street:'-Foothill Blvd 'i Volume Ccnditians: Existinu +Alternative A AY Peak flour VD#mmeS Fropcsad Madi;icaticn: None fExlsting Conditions) ifackground c..m::lat.ak-CKWUND' Frmiect ?OTAL TOTAL Peak 3ACKGROU0 Ptak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC E isticg ProposEd Hour' VIC' koar VIC Hour Ratio Ratio r ftvei nt Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Voiue Ratio, 'Volume WExist Lanes wiProo Lanes NL 0 0 448 0,00 0 0.00 .0 0.00 0.00 'IT 7,200 3,.200 0 u.25 1 0 O;M x ; 4R 0 :•40 0.00 0 0.00 �` '374 0.00 Mo SC 0 0 0 01004 0 0.00 t \: 0 �EM0 A 0.00 # t SI 0 0 0 0,�0 0 0.W' 0 SR' 0 il 0 0;00 ,9 0.00 0 0.00 L3.00 EL 1,600 1,600 110 0.07 t 0 0.07 t 1 0 0.07:1 ,Mo t` I ET 3,200 3,200 3;8 0.14 0 0.14 335 0.24 0100 ER 0 0 0 0.00 0,� 0.00 „- 0 0.00 0.00 kL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 kT 3;,-Or ,200 1382 0.43 t 0 0.43 t 333 0.541 0.00 t_ , k"n 1.60v' 1,600 10 0.05 0 0:05 74 0.05 7.00 ICU= 0.75 0.75 0.43 0.00 4� LOS= C A Notes: !� e)Asterisk M indicates critical movement. ) 6) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 041Lane AFA Prp;ect Number 289.001 talc. Date: 01/22190 . tITT=R'5'EuTIDN CAPAC17Y UTIL17ATIDN ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cdca:onaa NIS Street:,`;15 K3 Rasps E/K Street: Fpathiil Elvd. Volume'Condit,ons.Existina +Alternative f°PM Peak Your Proposed Modificatian..Rone (Wsting Conditions)' s r., 5ackoround `� Cumulat BACKDROURD Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC j J` Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC Naor Ratio "Ratio ' Nareaent Capacity Capacity Vbluee Ratio Volume Ratio Valuoe n/exist tans' Wimp LaUms NL 0 0 46B 0.00 0 0.00 ill ^ 0 40 0.00 IT r"200 3,200 P o.35 1 ? 0.35 1 0, 0.%4 ;' O.Oo 1 NR 4 0 662., 0,00. 0 0.00 450 O.CO Me 51 0 U e 0.00 t 0 oleo t . 10.00 t oleo 1 ST o 0 0 0.00 0 0 60 0 Me D.00 SR _ 0 0 0 0.00 0 0,40' 4 4Ao 0.00 El: 1,600 1,600 413 0.26 1 0 0.26 t 0 0.261 0,00 t ET 3,200 3,200 864 0.27 0 0.27 576 0.45 0.00 ER 0 0 0 0.00 0 000 0 4.00 0.40 St 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 O.00 0.00 kT 3,200 3,200 872 0.27 S 0 0.27 t 830 0.53 1 0.00 1 B 1,600 1,600 73 0.05 0 om 180. 0,16 0.00 E }t ICU= 0.08 0.88 1,24 Oleo L9S= D D F A Sates' a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical :ove:ent. b)LOS=Level Of Service -)ease traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICE5, INC. l"i d) Capacity based on 1600 VN/Lane J AFA Pruject Number 289,001 :air. !fate: 01/22/90 4J ci " I ):TERSECTLDN CAPACITY aILIIATiIDH ANALYSIS 1 City of: Rancho Cucamonga ;, ` X, R/S Street: Etiwanda Ave E/M Street: r"mothill'Bivd Volume Condition's: Existing s Alternative A P.N Pedk Hour Proposed Pi46MEatioo: None(Existing Conditions) Existing Cuaulat EXISTIµ. �4;Project I001. TDTAL Peak EXISTING Peak }CUMULAIIVE Peak V/C Vic Existing Proposed Hour WIS Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio. Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Value Ratio Volume w/Exist L4,nes w/Prap Lanes NL 0 0 @B 0.00 t " 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t A;00 t NT 1,600 1 600 93 0.14 0 0,14 28 MR 0.00 NR 0 0 48 0.00 0 0.00 27, ,.,0 0.00 SL 0 0 24 0.00 0 :0.00 :`.'/ 0.00 0.00 ST: 1,600 1,600 122 0.15 1 0 0.15 t 39 - 0.22 t 0.0D 1 iR 0 0 59 0.00 0 0.00 . 73 0.00 0.00 EL 1,d)0 1,600 G4 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 46 0 O7 t ' 0.00 t ET 3,2 0 34200 650 0 0.23 47 0125 0.00 ER 0 0 96 0.00 0 0.00 5 0.00 0.00 HL 1,LOD 1,600 58 0.05 0 0.05 37 O.Ob 0.00 YT 3,200 3,200 114E 0.31.1 0 0.37 2 75 0.39 1-- 0.00 t NR' 0 0 28 0.00 D 0:00 0 0.00 ,;� 0.00 f �a ICU= 0.57 0.57 / 0.68 0.00 LOS= A A B A Notes: a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. C) LOS=Level 0f Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, IMC, d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane 1 AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc. Date: 01/22/90 i/ I I N T E R 5 E C T L 0 N CAPACITY UTJ L1,7AT10N ANALYSIS �} City of:Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street: Etieantla Ave E/N Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing+Alternative A PM Peak Hour Proposed Matiification: None )Existing Conditions) Existing ju®uiat EXISTING Project TOTAL, TOTAL Peak EXISTI�Fi Peak +CIMULATIVE Peak VIC, Vic Existing Proposed Hour V/' 4our V/C Hour Ratfu Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Voli;ae Raf ute Ratio Volute a/Exist Lanes Wrap Lars NL 0 0 136 0� 0, 0;00 A 0.00 0.00 i ; 'IT` 1,600 1,600 155 0_ �� 0 0,26 i 67 0.34 V 0.00 t RR 0 0 125 tP y U J10 0.00 66 0.00al Q.00 3L 0 0 3 az10,I )f: 0 0.f"3 0 0.00 I 0.00 i f ST 1,600 1,600 79 1 fw 0 0.10 '. 65 0.22 0.00 SR' 0 0 41 ;! 5, f` ' 0 0'.00 127 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 `> '' , 0 0.03 111 0.12 O.OQ ET 3,200 3,200 s0,41 X 0 0.41 t Ilo 0.45 t 0.00 2 ER 0 0 4 0.00 0 0.00 12 0.00 0.00 ' NL 1.600 1,600 43 0105 1 0 0,05 C 64 0.07 1 O.On 2 NT 3,200 3,200 65'1 0,22 0 0.22 129 0.26 0:�0 OR 0 0 53 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 I. ICU= 0.72 0.72 0.85 0.00 LOS= C C 6 A `totes a)Asterisk M indicates critical movement. b)LOS =level Of Service. c)Base traffic voluaes source:` TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. tl) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Protect Number 289.001 Calt. Date: 01/22/90 1NTER8ECT10N CAPACITY U T I L I I A T 1 0 N AHALYSI6 Ir r City of: Rancho 6uca�,,42 N/S Street: Etiwanda'Ave FIN Street:Arrow Hay Volume Conditions:;Exisi-Ing 1 �tz.nati e A AM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions). Existing Cumulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak a CUMULATIVE Peak Vic Vic Existing Proposed _ Hour V/C Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity ,:_ Voluma Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes HL 1.600 1,600 114 0.07 1 0 0,07 X 38 0.10 1 0.00 1, ':T 1,604 1,690 144 D,il 0 0.11 is 0.12 '0..00 NR 0 B 27 0.00 0 0.06 0 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 16 0.05 0 0.05 14 0.05 s00 ST 1.600 1,600 222 0.18 2' 0 0.18 1 15 0.19 I 0.00 SR 0 0 71 0.00 0-' 0.00 0 0.00, 0.00 EL 1,b00 1,600 33 D.05 t 0 0.05 1 5 0.05 6 000 1 ET 1,600 1,600 95 0.06 0 0.06 23 0.08 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 91 0.06 0„ 0.06 22 9.07 0.0c NL 1,600 1,600 102 0.06 0 0.06 Q 0.06 0.00 HT 1,600 1,600 261 0.16 1' U 0.16 1 36 �0.19 3 0100 1 NR 1,600 1,600 "34 0.05 0 ` 0.05 14 0,05 ICU= 0.46 C.46 0.51 0.00 LOS= A A A A Notes: _ Bi a) Aster>s'� (t) indicates critical xoveae�t. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic Volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES. INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 199.001 Ca1c. Dater 01/22/90 46 4 INTERSECTI0N CAPACITY UTILlZATI OW. ANALYS25 i City of: Ranch Cucamonga NIS Street: Etivanda Ave E/p Streah'Arrow Hwy 3 Volume Conditions: Existing+Alternative A PM Peak Hour J Proposed Nedificr-n: None (Existing Conditions) h Existing Cumulat EXIMNS Project TOTAL TOTAL j Peak EXISTING Peak +'CUMULATIVE' Peak VIC VIC Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC Hour R?tiD: Ratio Movement Capacity. Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Veluae ':._Exist Lanes w/Prop lanes f NL 1,600 1,600 60 0.05 0 0.05 65 0.08 ' 0.00 NT 1,600 1,600 294 4.23 L 0 :0.2$L 31 0.25 2 0 3 HR 0 0 71 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 27 0.05 L 0 0.05 t 37 0.05 1 0.00 L ST 1,600 1,600 t07 O.As 0 0.08 36� 0.10 0 00 �j ER 0. 0 20 0.00 0 0.00 0, 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 112 0.07 0 0.07 12 0.08 0.00 ET 1,600 1,600 355 0.224 0 0,22 L 55 0.26 A 0.00 L ER 1,6D0 1,600 126 0.08 0 0.08 56 0.11' 0.00 kL 1,600 1,600 38 0.05 L 0 0.05 D 0 0.05 1 0.06 L HT 1,600 1,600 115 0.07 0 0.07 64` 0.11 6,00 aR 1,600 1,600 41 0.05 0 0.05 17 0.05 0.00 i) f ICU= 0.55 0.55 0.61 LDS= A A B e Notes: a, Asterisk M indicates critical movement. b! LOS=level Of Service. ^1 Base traffic valumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d? Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Nuaber 284.001 Calc'Date: 01/22/90 Q7 INTERSECT10N �'GAPACITY UTILIIATION A N A L Y 5 8 V(� City of. Rancho Cucamonga" HIS Street: I-15 SB Ramps E/N Street: Foothill Blvd 4c:ume Conditions:Existing+Alternative B AN Peak„Hour Volumes < Proposed Modification: None (Exis g Conditiens) � Existing- Cueulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic VIC Existing Proposed Nm:r Vic Hour we Nour Ratio Ratio lovenent Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Value Ratio Volose w/Exist Lanes K/Prnp Lanes @7 YL 0 0 0 0.00 I 0 0.00 ! 0 0.00 x 0.001 AT 0 0 0 0.00 0 mo 0 0.00 0.00 NR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 v.00 SL 0 0 .38 0.00 0 0.00 I21 0.00 0.00- ST 3,200 3,200 0 0,17 2 0 0.12 t 0 " 0.15,t 1.00 x SR 0 0 331 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 >0.00 I 0.00 Y ET 3,200 3,200 59.8 0.17 Q 0.17 24] 0.25 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 511 0.32 1 0 0.32 E 0 4.32 0.00 WL 0 0 0 0.00't 0 0,00 1 0 0.00 0.00 ? ,l WT 31200 3,200 925 0.31 0 0.11 167 0.36 0.00 SR 1,600 1,600 440 0.28 A 0.28 209 0.41 A 0.00 t ICU= 0.44 0.44 0.56 0.00 LOS= A' A A A Notes: a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base trafric volumes source: TRAFFIC EATA SE);VICES, INC, d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Nusber 189.001 �,'l Calc. Date: 01122/90 `1 `' I , INTERSECTION CA?ACITY U,TILIIAT10K ARALySIS City of: Rancho Cutamonga. HIS Street: I-15 SB Ramps E/M Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing+Alternative ON Peak Hour a Proposed liodification: None (Existing Conditions) i� Existing. 'Cumulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic Vic Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour Vic Hour Ratio Ratio _�\ Movement Capacity Capacity V^''Ioe Ratio Volume Ratio _ Volume w/Exist Lanes mIProp Lanes PIL 0 0, Ob 0100 t 0 040 4 "!0 0.00 t 0.00 1 ;i HT` 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 NR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 .;1S 0.00 0 0.00 195 0,00 0.00f r_ ST 3,200 -3,200 0 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 0 0.0!/- t' 59 0 0 79 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 I EL 0 0 0 000 0 $.O0 0 0.00 0.00 ET 3,200 3,20D 1161 036 t 0 0.36 t 389 0.48 t- 0;9P I ER 1,600 1,600 370 0.23 01 0.23 0 4.23 0.00 HL 0 0 0 0.00 4 0 0.00 t 0 Q.00 t O.DD.s r r RT 3,200 3,200 1037 0.32 0 0.32 377 0.44 0.,0n F, HR 1,600 1,600 250 0.16 0 0.16 471 0.45 0.00 ICU= 0.41 0.41 0.57 0.00 El LOS= A A A A �1 1� o,`;ierisk (t) Indicates critical movement. b) LUs Level Of Service. rl Base t:'-fic volumes w,rce: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. .dl _(city Based an 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 281.001 CaIC.'Date. 01/22/90 u 4lI, s �r 1 IN TER SE CII0N CAPACITY > UTIL,I1AI10H ANALY'SbS - �; r City of-. Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street: I-15 NB Rasps ZIN Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions:Existing+Alternative B AM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions} v J, Existing Cusulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULAIIVE Peak Vic Vic Existing Pro,;-led Hour Vic Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes Nl 0 0 448 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 IT 3.200 3,200, 0 0,25 I 0 0.25 t 0 0.34 t 0.00 t NR 0 0 340 0.00 0 0.00 301 0.00 040 SL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 4 0 0.001 r e t ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 �^0.00 Q 0.00 I-0.0v SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 - 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 110! 0.07 t 0 0.07 3' 0 0.07 t 0100 t ET 3,200 3,200 448 0.14 0 0.14 362 Q.25 O.OQ I' <1 ER 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 l:L 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 WT 3,200 3,200 138Z 1.43 t 0 0.43 t 376 0.55 t 0.00 t NR 1,b00 1,600 10 0.05 0 0.05 83 0A Pr00 ICU= V.75 0.75 0.96 0.00 } LOS= C G E A Rotes al Asterisk (2) indicates critical movement. 6J LOS=level Of Service. j cl Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES INC. d1 Capacity based on 1600 VPH1Lane y� AFA Project Number 289.001, r Cale. late: 01/22/90 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS., City of: Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street: I-15 NB Ramps E/N Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing+Alternative B PM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTINB Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTINB Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V/C Existing Proposed Hour V/C Hour V1 Pour Ratio- Ratio Movement. Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio, Volume Ratin 4olume a/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes ` RL 0 0 468 0.00 !.0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 AT 31,200 3,200 0 0.35 t �N 0.35 S' 0 0.51 f 0.00 .� 4H 0 0 662 0.00 0 0.00 486` 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0„ 0.00 t 0.00 t 5i 0 0 0 OA 0 0.00 a, 0 00 O.QQ :SR 0 0 0 Q.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 413 0.26 t 0 0.26 t 0 0.26 ; 0.00 t ET 3,200 3,200- 864 0.27 0 0.27 584 0.45 0.00 ER 0 0 0 0.00 } 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 kL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 VT 3s200 3,200 872 0.27 t 0 0.27 t 848 0.54 t 0.00 t R 1,600 '�"`'600 73 0.05 011 0.05 188 0.16 0.00 ICU= 0.88. 0.88 i.31 0.00 LOS= D, O F A Notes: a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. 6) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane l AFA Piolect'i!a�b;r 204.001 Calc. Date: 01/°2/90 c I N I E R S E t T 1 0 N CAPACITY UIILIIAT1O3 AHALySIS City of: Rancho,Cucamonga NIS Street. Etiwanda Ave E/W Street: foothill Blvd Volume Corditions: Existing+Alternative,$AN Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditionsl , Existing Cumulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE -Feak VIC VIC' Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour V/C moor 'Ratio Ratio gq Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume -Ratio Volume ,#IExist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 g0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0.00 t NT 1,600 I'm 93 0.14 0 O,te, 30 0.1B 0.00 NR 0 0 4B 0.00 0 0.00 30 0.00 0.00 ' SL 0 0 24 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ST 1,600 1,600 122 0.15 t u 0.15 t 40- 0.22 t 0.00 I SR 0 0 69 0.00 0 0.60 81 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 69 0.95 d ,47 0.05 t 54 0.08 C_ 0.00 t ET 3,200 3,200 650 0.23 0 0.23 53 0.75 040 ER 0 0 96 0.00 0 0.00 5 0.00 00P WL 1,600 1,600 58 0.05 0 0.05 41 0.06 0.00 WT 3,?00 3,200 :148 0.37 t 0 0.37 t 80 0.39 3 0.00 4 WR 0 0 28 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00, 0.00 `w ICU= 0.57 0.57 0.69 0.00 LOS= A A B A Notes ® a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. b)LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH%Lane AFA Project Number 2B9.001 Caic.,Date: Oil22/90 S r, INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANA,LYSl_L5 City of:Rancho Cdcamoaga HIS Street: Etimanda Ave EIN Street.Foothill Blvd Volute Conditions: Existing+Alternative H PN'Pe;*Hour Proposed Modification; None (Existing Conditions) f tasting Cumulat EXISTINS Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXI5tIN6 Peak {;CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V1C -Existing ProF` ed Hour VIC Hour V/G Hour' Ratio Ratio_ L %overent Capacity Capority Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume,, alEx77 ist Lanes rlRrnp Lanes NL 0 0 136 0.00 0 0.00 0 NT 1,600 1,600 155 0.26 t 0` 0.26 1 70 0.35 I 0.60 1 , HR 0 0 125 0.00 0 0.00 64 .1.00 0.00 SL 0 0 3q O.00,t 0 On't 0 0.00 t 0.0,0 I ST 1,600 1,600 71 0.10 0 0.10 64" 0.22 0.00 ' SR 0 0 41 0.00 r 0 0.00 ' ISO 0.00 0.06- EL 1,600 1,600 76 0.05 �r 0 O.a: r ,; -1n 0.12-' O.OD WM ET _3,200 3,200 1223 0.41 t`J -rk :,10.41 I 119 41;S 0.00 t ER 0 0 7L 0.00 `- `' 0 0.00 15 0.00 AM kL 1,600 1,600 43 0.05 t 0 0.05 I 64 0.07 t 0100 S HT 3,200 3,200 651 0.22 0 0 27, 130 0.26 0.00 NR 0 0 53 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 jff.. ICU=' 0.72 0.72 6,66 ® LOS= C )C D Notes; Asterisk (I) indicates critical mgveeent. b) LOS=Level Of Service'. c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DAM SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPd/Lane I' i, AFA Pru;�ect Number 284.001 ,-., Calc. Date: 01/22190 7ER9,ECT;tj0N CAP ACI'TY DTILIIATI0N ANALY.SI3) City of: Rancho Cucamonga E/N Street: HIS Street: Etieanda Ave.: .,-, r Arrow P. Volume Conditians: Existino+Ait�rnative B��h Peak Hour y" Proposed Modification: Nona (Existing Conditions) Existing Cutulat `EXISTING Project TO[AL TOTAL, Peak EXISTING a, Peak +CUM�)LAT.IW,-, Peak VIIC NC Existing"Proposed flour Vic ' Pour V/C Wi Haur Ratio n Movement' Capacity Capacity ,,,volume Ngatio ''Volume Ratio Volume ;u/Exist Laces w/Prop Lanes J i NL 1,600 1,600 114 0.07 1 fi 0.47 1 36 0.09't 0.00 t l HT 1,600 1,1500 144 0.11 -0, 0.11 24 0.12 0.00 NR 0 0 r 27 '0.00 0 0.00 0 Oleo 0.00 J+ SL 1.600 1,600'; 16 0105 0 „O.05 20'', 0.05 0.00 ST 1,600 1,600 222 0.18 t 0 0.18 t 19' 0.20 ! 0.00 t SR 0 0 71, Oleo 0 0.00 Q; 0.00� 0.00. EL 1,600 1,603 33 0.05 1 0 0.05 3 5- 0.05 4 0.00 t ET 1,600 I'm sa 0.o6 0 0.06 22 0,09 ' 0.00 !.a 1,6Co 1,600 91 0.06 0 0.0 23 0.07 0.00 NL 1,60t1 1,600 102 0.06 0 0.06 0 0,P 0.00 NT 1,600 1,600 261 0.16 t 0' /0.16 1 36 o.19 t 0:00 t AR 1,600 1,600 34 0.05 0 }.05, 24 0.05 0.00 ICU= 0.46 0 k 0.53 4.00 LOS= A 'A A Notes: a)Asterisk (1) indicate;criti_A movement. b) LOS=T:evel Of Service. r! Oasr traffic voluses sours, TRAFFIC DATA GERVICESr INC. - d) Capacity based an1600 VPN/Lane x . y AFA Project Number 289.001. r raft. Date: 01/22/70 kl is t' ?l s. i ti'A INTERSECTION CAPACITY bTILIZA? I0N 'ANALY5<,.9 ' ,c City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: Etiwanda Ave ~``, ;IW� treet: Arraw Nay Volume Conditions: Existing+AltematiYe B PH tqk h4,ur Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Existing )Cumulat EXISTING protect TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING �� Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak ¢ VIC VIC Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC Hour 1Ratio Ratio `Movement Capacity Capacity VklUoe Ratio Volume Ratie Volume W/Exist Lanes a/prop Lanes e•. NL 1,600 11600 60 0.05 0 0.05 58 0.07 0.0E11 NT.. 1,600 1,600 294 0.23 t 0 0,23 t f 0.25 t 0.00 T NR 0 0 71 0,00 0 0.4 f0 0.00 0.00 111 SL 1,600 1,600 27 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 45 0.05 t O.00 t ST 1,600 1,600 107 ;?.08 0 yj.08 45 0.11 0.00 5R 0 0 20 4.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.06 EL 1 600 1,600 112 0,07 0 0.07 15 0.08 0.00 ET 1,600 1,600 355 0.22 t 0 0.22 t 49 0.25 I 0.00 1 ER 1,600 1,600 126 Q 08 0 0.08� 49 0.11 0.00 Jw WL 1,600 1,600 38 0.05 t 0 0.05't 0 0.0,5 t 0.00 WT 1,600 1,606 J15 0.07 0' 0.07 58 0.11 0 c"6 MR 1,600 1,600 "41 0.05 0 0.05 39 0.05 0.00 'I ® ICU= 0.55' 0.55 „b.60 0.60 LOG= A A A A i; Notes: rr a;:,Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. 6)''DS=Level Of F,iarvice. c) Base traffic volumes Source: TRAFFIC DATA£ERVICES, INC.' 1� d) Capacity baud an 1600 VPH/Lane „ AFA Project Hus6er 289;b01 Calc. Date, 01/22190 fc �� 1 YF Ll _ a FNIEP3ECT10M CAPACITY 011LIZATI2N A1IALYSIS O U City of: Rancho Cucamonga 'r NIS Street., I-15 SR Ramps EI'm Street:foothill Blvd Volume Conditions. Existino+Alternative CAN Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTIN6� Project TOTAL TOTAL v r Peak EXISTING Peak +CUNULAfrSE 'Peak VIC VIC °Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour V/C-' Hour WHY Ratio Movement 'Capacity Caoacity Volute -Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist.Lanes n/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0:00 1 0.00 1, 4T 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 HR 0 0 0 , ? 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 3B 0.00 0 040 93 0.00 0.00 ST' 3,200 3,200 0 0.12 t 0 0.12 1 0 0.14 t 0,00 1 SR 0 0 331 0.00 0 0100 0 0.00 0.00 EL' 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 040 t I ET 3,200 3,200 558 0.17 0 0.17 187 0.23 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 511 0.32 t 0 0.32 1 -0 0.32 0.00 r> WL' 0 0 0 0.00 1 0 0.'00 1 0 0.00 0.00 NT 3,200 3,200 995 0.31 0 r; 0.31 104 O.Z4 0.00 NR 1.600 1,600 440 0.28 0 0.28 130 0.36 t 4.00 2 ICU 0.44 0,44 0.50 0.00 LOS= A A A A ;totes: a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. ck Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 VPNILane ' AFA Project Number 2B9.001 Ca1c.Date: OIIZ 90 IN7ERSECTI9N CAPACITY UTILi ;ATI0N- ANAL:4S`IS jj City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: 1-15 SR Ramps E/N Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing +Alternative C PM Peak Hour Voluces Proposed Modificatiu-: None (Existing Conditions)' Existing" Cueulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak =`EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE 'P�pak VIC V/C Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC +r Ratio `Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Vol;ide p/Exist Lanes u/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 '` 0.00 t 4 0.00 t 0.00 t 4T 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 NR 0 0 . 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 0 2. 15 0.00 0 0.00 1GO 0,00 O.Ib ST 3,200 3,200 u 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 0 0.094 0A t SR 0 0 74 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 Ian EL 0;i 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 t ET 3,200 3,,200 ilbl 0.36 t 0 0.0 t� 360 0.48 t 0.00 t ER 1,600 1,600 370 0.23 4 0.23 0 0.23 4.04 NL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0.00 t Nf 3,700 3,200 1037 0.32 0 0.32 360 0.44 0.00 WR 1.600 1,600 250 0.16 0/; 0.16 450 0.44 0.00 ICU= 0.41 0.41 0.57 0.00 I LOS= --1 A A A Notes i al Asterisk (11 indicates critical movement. S) LOS=Level Di1ervice. cl Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. dj Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane - AFA Project Number 28g.001 Calc.Date: 01/72/90 I� i . ,a ' I N I E R S E C T I a N CAPACITY 0 1 1 L I I A 7 1 0 N ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: 1-15 NB Ramps E/N Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing+Alternative CAN Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Madification: None (Existing Conditions) n Existing Cusulat EXISTIN6 Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTIN6 Peak +,CUMULATIVE Peak Vic V/C Existing Proposed Hour YM Hour VEC Hour 'Ratio Ratio Movement, Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volute patio Volume w{Exist Lanes a/Prop Lanes ` NL 0 -0 448 0.00 0 0..60 0 0.00 '0.00 VT 3,204 3i200 0 Oi25 i 0 0,25 fi 0 6,32't 0.001 NR 0 0 3f0 0.00 0 0.00 234 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0.00 1 0 011.001# 0 0.00 t 0.06 t ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 OAO 0 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 110 0.07 t 0 0.07 t 00 0.07 t 4.00 t ET 3,200 3,200 44B 0:1`4 0 0.14 280 0.23 0.00 ER 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0., >0.00 0.00 HC 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 NT 3,200 3,200 1382 j; 0.43 t 0 0.43 t 234 0.51 t 0.00 1 AR 1,600 1,100 10 `,0.05 0 0.05 52 0.05 0.00 ICU= 0.75 0.75 4.84 0.00 LOS= C C D A Notes: �l a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. t) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d)Capacity based on 1600 V°H(Lane AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc. Date: oil'2/90 z law INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILI7 TIDN 'ANA1,"Y5IS City of: Rancho Cucaoon4ai HIS Street: I-15 NS Ramps E/W Street: Foothill Blvd VoIuoe Conditions: Existing+Alternative C PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: None(Existing Conditions) Existing Cusulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC V/C Existing Proposed Hour Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity. Capacity Volute Ratio Volume Ratia Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop,Lanes NL 0 0 468 0,00 0 040 0 0.00 9.00, Ali 3.200 3,200 0 0.35 t 0 0.35 1 0 0.49 t 0.00 1, NR 0 0 662 0.00 0 0.00 450 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0.00 I 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t ST 0 0 0 0:0q_ 0 0.06 0 0.00 0.00 s/ SR 0 0 0 0.00 6 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 413 0.26 t 0 0.26 t 0 0.26 t 0.00 I ET 3,200 3,200 864 0.27 0 0.27 540 0.44 0.00 ER 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 WL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ago 8T 3,200 3,100 872 0.27 t 0 0.27 t 810 0.53 t 0.00 t WR 1,600 1,600 73 005 0 0.05 180 9.16 4.90 s ® ICU= 088 0.88 1.27 0.00 r LOS= D D E A-) z Notes: a) Asterisz tt) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffi, vulaaes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity`hased on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project dumber 287.001 Calc. Date:` 01/22/90 w 7 - INTERSECT'iDN CAPACITY UTILI2A'FIDN AHALr. S Cicy of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: Etioanda Ave E/N Street:.foothii,'Blvd dk Volume Conditions: Exi+rag-+AIternative C AN Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification.,None (Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulaf EXISTING =roject -TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING= Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak We V/C Ex king Proposed Hour V/C Hoes V/C Hour Ratio Ratio eogament Capacity Capacity Velure Ratio Volume Ratio Volume.r/Exist Lanes a/Prop Lanes A.n,f NL 0 0 B8 -,�.00 i 0 0.00,t, 1W;j 0.00 O.Oif-_� 'IT 1,600 1,600 93 0.14 0 0.14 16 0.23. 4 0•B//O.{ 1 ;IR 0 0 ,48 0.00 0 0.00 _�13 0.00 O.PO� SL 0 0 24 0.00. 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 1, ST 1,600 1'bOO 122 0.15 1 -�-0 045 1 27 0.21 0.00 5R 0' 0 89 0.00 0 0.00 66 0.00 0.00 EL` 1,600 1,600 69 0.05 1 0 005 1 36 0.07 1 0,00 1 ET 3,200 3,200 650 0.23 0 0.23 - 39 0.30 0.00 ER 0 0 0.00 0 ).AO 160 0.00 0:00 t 11L 1,600 1,600 58 0.05 "'0 0.05 9 0.05 0.30 kT 3,260 3,200 1148 0.37 t 0 0.37 1 a4 0.35 1 0.00 1 ' NR 0 0 28 0.00 0" 0.00,, 0 0.00 0.00 t i ICU-_ 0.57 0 57' 0.69 0.00 LOS= A- A B A wtes' a► Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. 0 Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d)Capacity based on 16G'G'VPH/Lane• AFA,Pro.ect Huober 289.001 Calc.Date: 01122/90 n { r _ i .. �71, - - 1NTERSECI10N CAPfr"CITY UTILIZATZOC A H A L Y 9 1 S City of: Rancho ucamonga NIS Street: Etiwanda Ave E/W Street: Foothill Blvd " Voluoe Conditions: Existing +Alternative C.PH Peak Hour Volum?s Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Existinq Cumdlat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak E:ISTIN6 Peak t CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity-Capacity Volume Raf-, Volusi� Ratio- =Volume "/Exist Lanes Wrap Lanes' NL 0 0 > 136 0.60 0 0.00 376 0.00 0.00 NT 1,600 11b00 155 0.26 t 0 0.26 t- 64 O.ii t 0.00 1 NR 0 J 125 0.00 : 0 0.00 45 0.00� 0.00 SL 0 0 34 0.00 to 0' 0.00 l 0 0.00 L 0.00 1 ST 1,600 1,600 79 0.10 0 0.10 52 0.21 0.00 SR 0 0 41 0.00 0 0.00 128 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 76 0.05 0 0.05 .1i6 0.114 0.00 ET 3,200 3,200 1223 A,41 t 0 0.41.9 135 0.53 t 0.00 t ER 0 0 76 0.00 0 0.00 - 272 0.00 0.00 NL 1,600 1,600 43 OAS 1 0 ��05 t 45 0.06 t 0A0 t 4 RT 3,200 3,200 651 0.22 0 0.22 135 0.26 0.00 8R 0 0 53 0.00 0 0.00 0 0,00 0.00 ICU= 0.72 0.72 1.15 0..00 LOS= C C F A Notes: 1 a) Asterisk it) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. ! i c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 VPHlLane fi } i AFA Project Humber 289.001 r Calc. Date- 01/22/90 ,t INTERSECTION APACIT UIILI2,ATNZNI,, AtiRLy519 City of:Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street:Etiwanda Ave E/N Street: Arrok Hwy Volume Conditions: Existing+Alternative C AM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: None ;Existing Conditions) Existing Cu;+:U:.f EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peaf +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC ® Existing_ Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 1,600 I'm 114 0.07 t 0 0.07 t 0.08 t Q.00 t NT 1,600 1,600 144 0.11 0 011 38 0.13 0.00 NR 0 0 27 0.00 0 0.00 yl 0 0.00 fl.QO SL 1,600 1,600 16 0.05 0 0.05 f. 21 0.05 0.00 ST 1,600 1,600 222 0.18 t a 0.18 t 22 0.29 t"� 0.00 t SR 0 0 71 0.00 0 0.00 140 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 33 005 t A 0.051 90 0.48 t 0.00 t � ET 1,500 1,600 98 0.06 0• 0.06 4 0.D'� 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 91 0.06 0 0.06 4 0.06 0.00 NL 1,600 1,600 i02 0.06 0.06 0 j`J,06 0.00 kT 1,60Q 1,600 261 0.16 t 0 0.16 t 27 0.18 t 0.00 t ti AR 1,600 1,600 34 0.05 0 0.05 J 20 0,05 0.00 ICU= 0.46 0-.46 0.63 0.00 LOS= A k: B A > JY 0 Notes: al Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. b)LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes soirce: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane F AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc.,Be:c: 01/22190 k, iffi1 INTERSECTI0'A CAPACITY UTIL'IZATI0N AH AIL YSIS r- City of: Rancho Cucamopg r N/S Street: Etiwanda Ave i'' Elk Street. Arrow Hpy Volume Conditions: Existing+Aitgnative G PM Peah Hour Volumes Proposed Nodificatiant Hane Existing Conditions) " Existing Cusulat EXISTINR' Project rOTALI TBfAL a peak EXISTING Peak t CUNUIh`TWE peak vlC"1 ft, �sistlog Proo,,sed Hour VIC Hour U!C lour •� Ratio Ratio Itwen: t ity Capat,ty Volume Ratio Volume Ratio', V�luoe tpZiist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 tc, 60 0.05 0 0.05 4 0105 0.00 4T I'm 1,600 294 0.23 t 0 0.23 t 86 0.28 t 0.00 t NR 0 ;r,\ 0 71 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1,600 1'1,600 -.27. - '`05 t 0, 0.05 t 61 046 t 0.00 t i - ST 1,600. to "-"0.08 0 0.08 ' 80 0.28. 0.00 SR 0 0 20 0.00 0 0.00 234 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 112 +' 0.07 Y 0 0.07 r3r^ 0.28't 0.00 t ET 1,600 1,400 355 0.22 t 0 0.22 t 29 0.24- 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 126 0.09 0 0.08 10 "0.09' 0.00 aL 1,600 1,600 38 _-.0.05 t 0 0.05 t 0 0.05 0.00 NT 1,600 1;b00 115 0.07 0 0:07 10 0.08 t 0.00 t t AR 1,600 1,600 0.05 0 0.05 80 0.08 0.00 ICU= 0.55 0.55 v0.70 0.00 Los= A $ A Notes- .. a) As,')risk M indicates critical otwement. b) LOS'=Level Of c) Base traffic vulua,e5 source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. 6) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Cane AFA Project Nu'W-r .2$9.001 Caic. ➢ate: 01/22/90 1,NIERG' CI10N CAPACITY 011LIIAIIUN, ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga f NIS Street: I-15 S8 Ramps EIN Streefi�bothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing+Alternative 6 AM Peak Hour Volu4es Proposed Modification: H p None-(E.istin0 Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTING Project 1CTAt TOTAL t`s Peak EXISTING Peak +CMULATIVE Peak VIC Vic Existing Proposed Hour C V/C Hour VIC .Hour Ra+-ic Ratio 1 Movement Capacity Capacity Volume- Ratio Volume Ratio, Volume */Exist Lanes a/Prop Lanes NI 0 0 0 0.00'1 0 0.00 t.- 0 0.00 t 0.00 1 *4T 0 0 0 0.00 V 0, 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 NR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 38 0.00 0 0.00 94, 0.00 p.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.12 1 0 0.12 1 0 0.14 1 0.00 i SR 0 0" 331 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 , EL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0,00 0 0.00 1 0.00 1 ET 3,200 3,200 558 0.17 0 0.17 187 0.23 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 511 0.32,t 0 0.32 1`(� 5'`"` 0.32 0.00 WL 0 0 0 0.00 1 0,00� 1`• 0 0.00 0.00 WT 3,200 3,200 985 0.31 t .i .0.31 103 0.34 0.00 �� kR 1,600 1,600 440 0.28 ti 0.28 T�a-36 1 0.00 I; ICU= 0.44 0.44 0.50 0.00 US A A A ~' A1,Asterisk (1) indicates critical zovemeot. "-S=Level Of Service. c}Ifase traffic volumes source: TRAFF+:DATA SERVICES, 'MC. 'pacity Eased on 1600 VPH/Lane 4 AFA Project Huber 289.001 Calc. Dab: 01122190 ta •_.; INTERSECT10N CAPACITY U T I L I Z A T 1 0 N ANALYSIS City of. Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: I-15 50 Ramps EIN Street: Foothill b.Ivtt Volume Conditions.Existing+ 0lternatNe 0 PH Pcak Hour Volumes Proposed dodification; Hone (Existing Conditions) Fxistiho Cueulat ESIST)NS Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTIN6 Peak f MULATIVE Peak Vic VIC Exi-ting Proposed Hour Vic Hour VIC Hour Ratiu Ratio ® lovesent Cap,city Capacity Volume Ratio Volume 3atim Volume 4iExist Lames 'Wrop Lanes !•t NL 0 0 0 0100 t 0 0100 t 0 0.00 1 0.0 1 4T 0 0 0 0.04 0 0.00 a 0.00 0.00 NR 0 0 0 0.00 K- 0.00 0 0.00 III 100 i 1` SL 0 0 15 0.00 S 0.00 103 0.00 0.00 St 3.200 3,200 0 0.05 t 4 4.05 t !0' 0.09 t 0.00 t 5R 0 0 79 0.00 0- 0.00 0 0.40 0.00 EL 0 0 0 MO 0 0.00 0 0.00 0,00 FT 3,200 3,200 1161 0.36 t 0 0.36:t 365 4.40 t 0,00 t ER 1,600 1,600 310 OM 0 C7 0 V.23 0.00 kL 0 0 0 :0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0.00 t HT 3,200 3,200 i83T 0,32 0 0.32, 360 0.00 WR 1,600 1,600 ZZO 0.16' 0 O.iA 451 0.44 0.00 ICU-- 0.41 0.41 0.57 0.00 LOS= A A A A Notes: a)Asterisk (1}indicates critical zovement. bt LOS=Level Of Service. ^} Ease traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES( IHC. 41 Capacity based on 1600 VPHILane AFA Project Number A9.001 Calc,Date; 0112MO 1,, I INTERSECT"LION CAPACITY UTI:IZATI0N ANALYSIS City of. Rancho cucasonga N/S Street: I-15 NB Raw E(it Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions Existing +Alternative B AN Peak Naur Volumes Proposed Modification None (`listing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EIIE"IN8 Project TOThL TOTAL Peak EIISTINS Peak ' CUMI 1TIVE peak WC Vic Existing Proposed Hour V/C Nour-,'" V ; Hour Ratio ,Wi". mw,,eMent Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio ,rVolumi Ra.>o 'Volume K/Exist Lanes a/Prop,Lanes NIL 0 0 448 1,00 0 0.00 0 040 0.00 IT 1,20 I11, 0 0,25 t\s\, 0 0.25 t 0 0.32 1 0.00 i 1'R 0 0 340 0.00 0 0.00 234 0.00 0.00. SL 0 0 0 "1.00 t \i, 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 5.00 t Sr 0 0 0 ' 0.00 \, 0 0.00 0 „0.00 1.00 SR 0 0 0 0.00: 0 0.0t-,i 0 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 110 0.07 t 0 0,07 t ,0 �"0.01 t 0.00 i ET 3,200 3,200 448 0.14 0 0.14 ° °L f t#.23" 0.00 ER 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 Y 0.00 0.00 NL o Q 4! $.00 0 0.04 u�.,��tJO 0.00 UT 3,200 3,200 1382 0.43 t 0 0.43 t 2: 0.50 t 0.00 t R 1,600 1,600 li� 0.05 0 0.05 .`. 52 6.05 3.00 ICU= 0.75_, 0.75 0.89 0.00 A 1 Notes: a) Asterisk(t) indicates critical movement. b)'LOS=Level Of Service. C) Base traffic volumes source: ThAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based.on 1600 VPH/Lane �1 ' AFA Project Number 2W.011 Cal:: ni"e: W22190 CJ l II, TER9E,CT10H �CAPACITY if ILI�IAT10)1AHALYSIS_ City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: I-15 HB Ramps EIV Street: Footbll"!;''�BIvd - Volume Condicions: Existing+Alternative D PH,Peak Hour Cx u®es Proposed Modification: None:(Extstiag"Conditions) Existing CumuIat FXI5TIN6 Project TOTAL IDTAL -- Peak EXISTPG Peak +CUILA:IVS Peak 11 VIC, � VI" Existing Proposed Hour VIC� Hour V/C Hour jiatio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Rati �,o volume ka#io Volume N/Exist Lanes 'wCProp Lanes HL 0 0 468 0,00 0 0.00 0 0.00 II:00 'IT 3.700 3,200 0 ,' 0.35 t 0 4 a5 t v�� �� �(t.50 t 0.00 4 UR 0 0 662 0.00 f 0 0100 457 O.Oi) O.00 5L 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 i,.00 t ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 tri00- 0 0.00 0.00 SR 0 0 a 0.00 0 0,00 J 0.06 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 413 0.26 1 0 0.26 t 0 ' 0126 t 0.00't ET. 3,T^ ',:3,200 864 0.27 0 0.27 548 0.4+ ER 0 0 0 0.00 G 0.00 0 O.pP; O.rO UL 0 0 L 0.00 0 0.00 _0 OAO ' 0.00 WT 3,200 3,2u". 872 0.27 t 0 0.27 t all - 0.53 t 0.001t `dR 1,600 1,600 T: 0.05 0 0.05 ISO 0.16' 0.00 ICU= 0,88 0.86` 1.28 0.00 LOS= D D Fy ° Notes: a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movt3ent. b)1.05=Lml Of Service. c)Base traffic volumes source: TRA.°FIC DATA 4,RVICES, 112. d) Capzcity based on 1600 7PH/Lane ;l o AFA Project Number. 28?.001 Calc. Dater` 01122/140 lec 44 •7; , C,oil, INIER$EC'TInN CA!AC'ITY UTILII:Af20N ANALYSIS'(. r. � City of Raicbo,Cucamonga - N/S Et.wtanda Ave E!N Street: FoG'211'Blyd `Volume Conditions. F;sting t Alternative DAM Peaa;Hour Volumes Proposed Mudilication:None (Existing Conditions) Er st%pg Cusulat EXISTING Project TOTAi I07A! -k Ft EXISTING Feak +CUMUOTIVE Psak V/C'` Vic Existing xr pcseo Hour VJC Hour IC Hour Ratio Ratio Moveoant Capacity Capacity Volume patio 90110.e Ratio Volume ,y/Exist Lanes a/Prop banes NL Q Q B8 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 110 a«00 0 00 t NT 1,600 1y600 93 0.14 0 0.14 16 M3 3;l 0.00 t NR 01 0 40 0.00 0 O:vO 13 0.06 Q.00 SL 0 0 24 0,00 . 0 0,00 0 ST I'm 1,605 122 0.M 0 0.15 t 27 0.21 0.00 SR 0 0' 89 0.00 0.00 67 0«00 0.00 E EL 1,600 1,600 69 0.05 t il OM;t 36 ., 047 t 1.00.1 ET 3,200 312UO 650 0.23 0 '.J 23,- 39 0.30 ER 0 0 9,6 0 0.01 1bU 0.00 0«00 9! 1,600 1,fi00 '58 005 0 0.05 9 0.05 1:uJ L G AT 3,200 3,200 1143 0'.37 t 0 (I.37 t 85 0.39 t 0.00 x OR 0 0 28 0.00 0 ; 0.00 01 �0.00 i ICU= 0.51 0.57 _.b9 9 Ou LOS= A A B A 4 Notes: ice! v a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical sovement. b) L05=Level Of Service. X' c) Bas: traffic voluoes sourcab TRAFG.IC DATA SERVICES, d) Capacity,based on 1600 VPH/Lai ' Ca1c. ME-.Project Humber 287.001 , O1/2g/40 k 1 l F: 1,,HTERSECTI`4N' CAPACJIY UTIL'IZATID-,� A14ALY519 City of: Rancho Cucamc..ga' t NIS Street: Etiwartda AYe,_ E!N 5treet.'FooEhill Blvd' Volume Cnnditicns Ea:c:}ng+Alternative D Pj Peak Hour Volumes Proposed jDd_ Eatio,D. None(Existing Coiditions) Existing C�)ulat EX(STIN6 Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING 'raak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC Exi_cing Proposed Hour VIC Hour V!C Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capatity Capacity Volume R?'ao i Volume Ratic Volut, m/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes 136 0.00 f 0�A0 3l 1 A:OQ 0,00 1,600 1,600 155 �0.26 1 0 0,26 s 64 d,r 0 5't, - 0.00 s. gift Q Q 125 00.00 0.00 SL 0 4 34 0.00 1 0 0.00 s "0 0.00 s 0.00 1 ST 1,600 1,600 79 0.'10 ' 0 0.10 52 0.21 0.00 ' SR 0 0 41 O.OD b 0.00 131" 0.Qv ' 0.00 E!, 1.500 1,600 76 005 0.05 116 0.12 0.00 ET 3,200 3,200 .1223 0,41 t 0 om s' 135 ux's 0.00 s ER 0 0 76 &00 0.00 _,273 0`00 0.00 NL .1,600 1,600 .13 �0.05 s 0 ,.8.05 t ',t5 0.06 s 4.00 i HT 3,200 3,200 651 022 0[, 0.22 i36 0.26` 0,Q4 NR 0 0 53 0.0G 0 0.00 I� 0 4:00 0100 f, �® ICU= 0-.72 0.72 , 1.16 0.00 L05- C �',_ f A Notes:�'� a) Asterisk(1) indicates critical movement, 1. 6)L05=Level Of S6rvicR. P c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICEi, INC. d) Capacity based un 160Q VPH/Lai I ;f AFA Project Number 269.001 i, Caic.Date:'' 01122;90 I 'J I4, T .RSEn""T16N tiAPAC'ITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS IIATL0N ANALYSIS t City of: Rancho'Mama ng: ' r 14l111i Street: Etiwanda Ave E/N Street: Arrow Hwy EIN Street: Arrow Hwy ! Volume Conditions Existing+Aitern ive D Ai Peak Hour Volumes umes 71 Proposed Modification Hone,(Existing Conditions) Existing Cusulat EXI§7IN6 Project TOTAL TOTAL 6 Project iOTh�- 70TAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V/C IVY' Peak V/C Vic Existing Proposed Hour I V/C Hour Vic Hour Ratio Ratio Rour Ratio Ratio- iovement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio VOIam= 'Ratio Volume w/Exisfi Lanes'w/Prop Lanes Volume w/Exist Lanes wlProp Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 114 0.07 t 0 0.47 J 9 0.08 t 0.00 1 4 0.45 0.00 { NT 1,600 11600 144 0.11 0 0.11 38 0.13 0.00 87 0.28 t 040 J MR 0 0 27 0 f " .00 O O.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.t0 l` i� SL 1,500 1,600 16 0,0 0 0.45 22 0.45 0.00 611 0.06 t 0.00! ST 1,600 1,600 222 0.18 J 0 0.18 t 22 0.29 t 0;01 J 80' 0.28` 0.v0. SR 0 0 t 0.00 0 0.00 147 0.00 0.00 235 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1600 33 0.05 J 0 0:05 1 90 0.08 t 0.00 1, 337 0.28 t ET 1,600 I;Soo 9B 0.06 0 0.0': 0.06 0.00 9 29 0.24 0.1 1� ERR 1,600 i,b00 91 0..06 0 0.06 4 0.06 0.00 10 O.C9 0.00 WC 1,60' 1,600 102 O:Ob 0 0.06 0 0.06 0.00 3 0 0.05 0.00: NT 1j660 1,600 261 0.16 J 0 0.16 J 27 0.18 t 0.00 t t0 0.08 t 0.00 1, f kR 1,600 1.600 34 0.05 0 0.05 19 n.05 rt 00 81 0.08 0.00 ICU= 0.46 0.46. 9.63 09 0.70 LGS= R A 8 A 8 A i .� Notes: a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. b) 105=Level Of Service. e) base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC,, << d) Capacity'based on 1600 VPH/Lane GFA Project Number 284.001 Caic. Date: 01122/90 Calc. Date: 0182l90 IHT'ERSECT1*0N CAPACITY UFILIIAT10N A14ALySIS. City of: fiancho Cucamonga l i N/F Street: I-15 Se R�•;apt E/N.Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Condition;: Background f Alternative A AN Peak Hour Vol%mes �1 Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditinns) k Backgraumd Cumulat tBACKGROUN➢ Project IWAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak CUMULATIVE Peak I 1 Existing Proposed 'Hour V/C Hour WC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes' w/Prop Lanes r uL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0..00 t 0 0.00 1 mo i (` IT 0 0 0 0.00 r' 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 R ,0 0 6 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 SL 0 0 4 0.06 0 0.00 112 0.00 0.00 8T 3.;200 3,200 Q 0.53 1 0 0.53 1 0 0,56 I 0.00 1 , SR 0 0 167T 0.00 v 0.00 �} 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 t 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0 Q.00 t 0.00 1 ET 4,800' ;,800 351 0.07 0 0.07 223 0,12 0.00 ER I,600 1,600 546 0.34 0 0.34 ;. 4 0.34 0.00 SL 0 0 0.: 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 " 0.09 RT ' 4,800 4,800 1135 0,24 1 0 0.24'1 148. 0.27 t 0.00 t SIR 1,600 1,600 ifi9 0.12 0 0.17 185 ". 0.23 0.00 tf,U= 0.77 0.77 0.83 0.00 LDS= C } C B A I otea) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. �I b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volu59s sources AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project (lumber 139.001 Calc. Date: O1'/2,?/90 INTERSECTID11 :APACIT'Y UT ILIIATION AIlALYS15 City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: I-15';B Ramps CiN Street; Foothill @Ivd Volume Conditinns: Background+Alternative A PM Peak Hour-' Proposed?odifiz ation: jiane (Existing Conditions) Background CuLiat BACKGROUND-°Project TOTAL TOTAL r °eak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC Existing Proposed Moe -91C = fiopr VIC flour Ratio Ratio Irvament Capacity Capacity Volum;, Ratio Volume-: Ratio = Volume alExist Lanes WFrop Lanes NL 0 0 L 0 , 040 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.40 2 31T D o D ).ao a o.Do a 0.40 0.00 NR` 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 "0 ° SL 0 0 17 0,00 Q 0.00 ` 192,_, 6.00 0.00 5T 3,200 3,200 0 0.16 J 0a6 ;' 9 0.22 t _ '0.00 t', SR 0 0 505 6.00 0 0.00 0 0 04 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.0a(, 0 0.0�T1 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,800 1506 -a. 1 t 0 0.31 Y' 304 1.3ti 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 1444 0.90 0 0.90 0 0.90 0.00 NL 0 0 U 0.00 e 0 ¢;00 t 0 0.00 0.00 WT 4,800 4,800 536 0.17 0 0.17 369i' e.25 0.00 9R 1,600 1,600 !92 0.12 h 0.12 461 0.41 t 0.00 41 ICU= 0.47 0.47 0.63 0.00 L05= 11 ti A B A /` Notes: aI'Asterisk it) indicates critical movement. bj LOS=Level Of Service. 0 Base traffic volupes source AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, IHC. 1 d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH1Lane °A,Project Number 39.001 Ca1c.ligte Q172t140 i! i I'NIERS.ECTIGN CAPACITY` UTILiIATION AHA0YS:F5 City of,Rancho Cucamonga ` NIS Street:Ftiwanda,Ave' E/b Street: Arrow H4V Wine Volpae Conditions: Existing+Aiternat:ve:D AN Feak Hou.Valumr., ( ' Proposed modification: None (Existing Conditions) ' Existing Cuoulat Exi9 lNB. Prol.ct' TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISIING Peak r.CUNULATItc Peak VIC VIC o cxisfin9 Proposed. Hour VIC Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Ca. , ..ty Capacity Volume Ratio Vd:;:me Ratio Volune, w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Ones NL 1,600 1,600 114 0.07 t 0 0.07 t 9' 0.08 t 0.00 t 1f !I 1,b00 1,bQQ 144 0•ii 0 O.i1 38' :0.13 0.00 ;1 NR 0 0 27 0.0L 0 ;,,-0.00 4 0.00 0.00 5L 1,600 1,600 16 0.05 0== 0.05 22 0.05 0.00 ST 1,600 1,600 222 0.18 t 0 4118 t 22-1 0.29 t 0.00 °R 0 0 71 tt 00 0'' 0.0'1 115 0.00 0.00 11 EL 1,600 1.600 ril t 0 0.05 1 90 DAB t. b"00 t• ET 1,600 1,600 9B 0.06 0 0.06 4 0.06 0.00 Eft 1,600 1,6M 91 0.06 0 0.06 4 0.06 0.00 NL, 1,600 1,600 102 0.06 0 0.06 0 0.06 C:00i di 1,640 1,600 261 0.16 t Q O.ib 27 O.;E a 0.0Q.3 t NR 1,600 1,600 34 0.05_: 0 0.05 19 0.05 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.01 0.00 I LO5= A. A 9 A r, 1 j Notes: a! Asterisk 1t) indicates critical movement. b1 LOS=Loral Of Service. 0 Base traffic vi.umes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES,,INP, 3)Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane fl f�1 AFA Mje_t Number 289.001 •, Caic. Date: ''_ 01/22190 . 4 fi NT,ER8ECI10N CAPACITY UT'ILIIAT'r'0N AN6L?SIS City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 l' N/S Street. Etiwan6 Ave Elk Street: Arrow Hwy Volume Conditions. Existing +Alternative➢PH Peak Hour`volumes Proposed Modification: None (Existing Cacditiors) Existing Cumulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak" EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V1C VIC Existing Proposed Hour V/C Hour ? V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Rati6 'Volume wlExist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 30 0.05 0 0.05 4 0.05 GOO HT 1,600 1}60:% 244 0,23 11 0 0.23 t 87 0.264 0.00 t MR 0 0 7.L 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600' 27 0.05 i 0 b.05 t 61 '' 0.06 t 0.00 2 ST 1,600 1,600 107 0.00 0 0.08 80 0.28 0.00 SR 0 0 20 0.00. 0 0,00 235 0.00 0,00 ' u - F� El. 1,600 1,600 112 0`07 0 0.07 337 0.28 t 0,00 i > ET 1,600 ,600 355 6.22 1 0 ID i 24 0.24 0. 4 ER 1,600 1,600 126 0.00 0 0.08 .. 10 0.04 0.00 kL 1,600 .1,600 38 0.05 1 0 0.0`'i rf 0 0.05 0,00 %T I;400 1,600 Lis 0.01 0 0.07 t0 0.0a i 0.00 1 }� AR 1,600 1,60041 045 0 0.05 81 O,OB 0.00 � d ICU= 0..55 0.55 0.70 0.00 L03= t. A B A Notes: a) gsterisk (t) indicates critical movement b)LOS=level Of Service. br)2Ase traffic volumes"source: TRAFFIC n,m'SER°)IC«, INC. d)Capacity based on 1600 VPH/L--ina it AFA Project Ngo6er 284.001. Calc.Batc 01122/90 . s _�INIER5 CTaUN 'C'APACIIY UTL=LIIATI011 ANALYSIS City of 4anchu Cucamonga AIS Strep�: I 35 SB Ramps E1W Street: f ill Blvd Volume Conditions: BackorDund+Alternative A AN Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cusulat BACK6ROUHD Project TOTAL TOT".:; Pea6' BACf:RDUFD Beak +CUMULATIVE ,:Peak Vic TOT". Existing Proposed Hour I Vic ;Maur. V1C„ Hour Ratio /'Ratio 1!ovement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio V_oIuae ?I/EY5st Lanes - /Prop Lanes NL 0 0 ^ 0.00 3 0 0.00 1 0 0,00 1. 0.00 1' YT 0 0 0 LOO 0 0.00 0 4.00(� 0,00 1R ? c 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 4 0.00 0 t.00 112 0.00 0.00 ST .3,200 3,200 0 0.53 t -0 0.534 0 0.56 2 0.00 t SR 0 1673 0100 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 i� EL 0 0 0 0.00 1 0 MO 4 0 0.00 3= 0.00 s ` ET 4,900 4,800 351 0,07 6 0,07 223 0.12 0.00` ER' 1,600 1,600 546 0.34 0 0.34 0 0 34 0,06�") NL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.06 WT 4,800 4,S00 :35 0�24# 0 0.24 i, 148 0.27 1 0.00 R NR 1,600 1,600 IF 0.12 0 0.12 165 0.23 0.00 1 ICU= 0.17 0.77 0.83 0.00 LOS= G;: £ D A v- Notes: 4' a) r-teri,k (1) indicates critical movement. b)'LU5=LeveI Of Service. c) Base traffic volutes source: AUSTIV-FOUST ISSUE, INC. d) Capacity based..n 1600 VPH/Lane sr AFA Project lumber 2,i.COl £alc. Date: 0112215'0 }� t y I N 7 E R5ECT 111N CAPACITY 07iLIZAII0N ANALYSIS ` City of Ranc4q Cucamonga A/S Street: I45 SB Ramps GIN Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Condi.ians: Background+Alternative A PM Peak Hour 1t Propo-ed Cudification:'None (Existing Conditi'41's) i \ '( Backgrumid Cumulat BACKGROUND .Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVG' Peak V/C VIC isting Proposed Hour V/C Hour V/C Hour :Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume ^ Rata Volume w/e'xist Lanes w/Prop Lane NL 0 ;0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t IT 0 0 0 1,11 0 0,11 Q 0.00 NR 0 0 t 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 9'. 0 0 17 0.00 0 0,00 - 192 �' . �0.00 D.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.16 1 0 0.16 1�\ 0 0.22 I r-00 t SR 0 0 505 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0' 0.00 t 0.00 t FA ET 4,800 4,600 1508 0.31 t 0 0M t 384 0.39 0 09 ER I,6v0 1,600 1444' 0,.90,, 0 0.90 0 0.90 NL 0 0 0 0.00't 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 0.00 kT 4,800 4,800 836 0.17 0 0.17 369 0.25 0.00 kR I MO I'm 192 0,12 0 0.12 461 0,41 t 0.00 1 ICU= 0.47 0.47 0.63 O.Oa LOS= A' A B A Notes: a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. b)LOS=Level Of Service. c)Base traffic,.:,tuies source. AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. (: d) Capaciti breed on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc. Date. 01f22/90 i i ileIERSECTIOH CAP AEITY 3TILIZAT =ON 1 'IALYC`IS City of Ranchl Cucamonga,_; tl � HIS Street, 1-15 NB Raps. EiN Street:Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions Backo:.%�und+Alternative A 4R Peak Hour Proposed dadification..NwR (Existing Co ditions) Background Cumulat CACMNUHt; Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Feak +CUMULATIV'E Peak VIC VIC Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity 11pacity Mule Ratio. Volume Ratio ,.,Voluae a/Exist Lanes NlProo,Lanes NL 0 0 747 U00 0 0.00 0 .00 0.00 Q 4T 3,200 3,200 0 0.33 t 0 0231 k 0 0.00 1" , HR 0 -0 244 `1.00 0 0.w 271 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t ` ST 0-- 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 fi 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 t 4 `5 .00 t 0\", 0.00 t. 0.00 1:: ET 4,000 4,800 112 0.05 0 0.05 335 49 0.00 ER 1t500 1,600 248 0.16 0 0.16 0 0.00 HL 0 ,. 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 f 00 0.00 VT 4,800 4,800 527 0.11 1 0 0.11 t 333`r 0.10 it 0.00 t rR 1,600 1,500 32 0.05 .0 0.05 74 1� 0.67 0.00 ICU= 0i44 0.44 LOS= A. A' t,1 Notes: ) Asterisk M indicates critical mavece0t. b) LOS=Level 01 Service. " N c)Base traffic volumes source: AUSSIH-FLUST ASSDC, INC. `. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane ' AfA project Number 79V.001 J talc. Date: 0122t22/90 147ERSECT10N CAPACITY UFILIIATIaX ANALYSIS City d Rancho Eucomongi 1\ N/S,Street: I-15 N8 Rasps E/N Street.Foothill alvd Vance Caad:tionsc.Backgroundt Alternative A PM Pt k Hour Proposed Modification: None Miisting Conditions) Background'` Cumutat BACKGROUND Project :9TAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak•- Vic Vic Existing-Proposed Hour We Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio ,Volume Ratio Volume k/Exist Lanes u/Prop L al j -- -�--� 41, 0 0 407 oleo 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.40 IT 3,211 3.200 0 1,31 1 .`, 0.31 t 0 0.46 1 0.00 t HR 4 0 337 0.0o U 0.00 480 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 0. 0.00 t 0 040 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 l St 0 0 0 0.00 0 oleo' a 0.00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00101 { EL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00't 0 0.00 t Me t ET 4,800 4,800 276 0.06 0 "0.06 576 0.18 o.00 EH 1,600 1,600 1123 4.>33 0 0.83 0 0.93 0.00 NL 0 `,o 0 woo 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 tAbm NT 4,900 4,000 421 Oleo 1 0 e.09 1 830 0.26 1 0.00 1 mR l,bo0 1,600 115 0.07 0 0.07 184 0.19 0.00 ICU= 0.40 0.40 0.72 0.011. tosz # A C R Notes: aI Asterisk M indicates r:ticai eovem nt. y' 61 LOS=Level Uf Servir.. cI Base traffic v0t; as source: AU5TIN-POUSi ASSUC, INC, d) Caaaci+ !_;eu'nn lb00 VPH/Lane w AFA Projece,Naber 289.401 Calc.Date: 01/22190 QM .� t 1 I N T E R S E V,T 1 0 N DAPAL:IIY UTILIIATI0N A N A L Y 5 1 S City of: RaLmsho Cucamonga 4/8 Street:Etimanda 9Ve E/W Street:€oo)liII Blvd: Volute Conditions: Background t Alternative A AN Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cumulat BACKBROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak AACY9ROUN0 peik f CUMULATIVE Peak vie Vic ,�. Existing Proposed Hour Vic Hour Wik Hour Ratio Ratio ®® Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio; Volume a/Exist Lanes n/Prcp Lanes 5dl tit 1,600 1,fi00 li0 0.07 t 0 0.07 0 07 t 0.00 u 'IT 5120) 3.200 259 0.09 0 0.69 i8 O.ii 6.00 NR 0 0 22 0.00 0 0.00 2F ~ 0.06 0.00 r. SL 1,600 1,600 -129 0.14: 0 0.14 0 0.1s 040 C_-' 3,200 3,200 839 0.27 t 0 0.27 t 39 0.31 3 3R 0 0 33 0.00 0 0.00 73 -. 0.0tl' 6.00 EL 1,600 1,600 51 0.05 1 0 0.05 1 46 006 t 0.00 t ZA ET 3,200 1,200 196 0.01 0' 0,09 _ 47 0.10 1 0.00 t ER 0 0 82 0.00 0 0.00 5 0.00 0.00 WL 1,600 1,500 140 0.09 6.69 37 0.11 t 0.00 I HT 4,800 4,300 421 0 1# t 0 0.i4 t Is 0.15 t j` 0.00 t l' 'R 0 0 227 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.60 �} ICU= 0.53 0.53) 0.59 0.00 LOS= A A .' A A. al Astorisk (1) indicates critical movement. ~ b)LOS=Leval Of Servi e. cl Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. IJ ' dl Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane APA Projecthim6er 289.001 J Calt.Dat-: 01,22190 �.f Yr N T E R S E C T 1 0 K CA PAC'ITY UTi IZAT``I1ON ANALYSIS City of.Rancho Cucamonga HIS Street:Etiaanda Ave VN Street: Icothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative A PR Peak Hyuf= Proposed Modification: None(Existing Conditions) tiund Cumulat BACKERCUN'U 'Protect TOTAL `TOTAL r Peak _ BACKBRCUNO Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak ,a Vic lie Existing Yropos d Hour VIC Hoor VIC Hour Ratio Ratio _- yavement Capacity Capacity Volute Ratio Volume Ratio Volua- WE ist Lanes olftp Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 248 0,13 0 0.13 4 0.rlr 0.Q4 NT 3,200 3,200 637 0.25:t ? 0.25 t ,67 bta'f 0.90 € NR 0 C '43 0.00 0 0.00 6e 0.00 3.00 SL 1,6V 1,600 514 0.32 1 0 0.32.1 0 0.:? t 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 331 v.11 0 0.11 65 0.17 3.00 SR 0 0 3B OAU 0 0.00 127 0.00 t1 0.00 EL 1,600 I,600 114 0.07 0 10.07, 117 - 0.'r f A.00 t 3�20b ?,700 460' 0.17t 0 0:15'K ilo �71.21 t „0Q t' ER 0 0 68 0.00- 0 0.00 12 OAQ 0:00 999 NL 1,600 1,600 16 0.05 t 0 0.05 i 6t 05 f 0.00 f NT' 4,800 4;800 ,^ fl.09 0 0.09 ( 8 0.11 t 0.00 t kR 0 0 ,act 0.00 0 0,00 --0 0.00 0.00 L, '; 0,74' 0.79 V.81 0.00 ® LOS= C r L. A Notes: al Asterisk (7) indicates critical movement. h) LOS=Level Of Service. -} Base traffic volumes source: WRTIN-RUST ASSOC, . ., di Capacity based an 1600 VPHILaae APA Project Number ,,.�B9.CT1 Galt. v.:ter 01122!90 .: . A G E R of'10 , 0791� INTERSECTIDIN LCAPACITY U I ql I I A T 1 0 N ANALY3IS City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street; EtiNanda Ave EIN street,, Arrow Hwy ` 71 Valuee Conditions: Background+Alternative A AM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None-(Existing Conditions) i Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL, Peak BACK69OUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic Vic Existing Proposed Hour Vic Hour V1C Hour Ratio Ratio lovement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume hRatio Volume N/Exist Lanes N/Prop Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 463 0.29 t 0 j.29 t 38 0.31 t 0.00 d PT` 3,200 3,200 t41 0.07 0 0.07 1B 0.07 0.00 !4R 0 0 BO 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 292 0.18 0 0.18 14,: 0.)9 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 487 0.15 0 0115 15 u.16 0.00 SR 1,60 1,600 361 0.23 t 0 0.23 t 0 0.23 t 0.00 t El 1,600 1,600 !b 0.05 t, 0 0.03 t 0.0 f 0.00 t ET 3,200 3,200 247 0.10 0 0.10 23 ' 0�11 0.00 ER 0 0 61 0.00 0 040 Ye t.00 0.00 it HL 1,600 1,600 170 0.11 0 0.11 0 0.11 0.00 kT 3,200 3,200= 927, 0.35 t C, 0.35 t 36 0.37 t 0 a0 t_ WR 0 0 IGO 0.00 0 0.00 19 0.00 0.00 ICU= 087 6.87 0.91 0.00 LDS= D D E A Notes a) Asterisk (t; indicates critical movement. b) LPS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source; AUSTIH-POUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based as 1600 VPHlLane ICA AFA Project)lumber 289.001 Calc. Date, 01/22190 � n -J .s I14TER5zCTI0H APACITY UIILIIATIOH A-0AL_Y569" City of: RanchgCucamonga 1 yr NIS Street: Etiaanda Are E/W Street.Arrow Hwy Votuae Conditions: Background +Alternative A P'Oe`k Hour i Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cumulat BAWROJNB 'Project bTAL TOTAL i Peak BACKSROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC f/ Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio ' Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist,Lanes wlProp Lanes, NL 1,600 1,600 113 0.07 0 0,07 55 0.1F 0000 c HT 3,100 3,200 420 0.21 i f.i0 0.21 1 31 0.22 1 0.00;t- NI; 0 0 192 0.00 4 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 97 0.06 1 0 0.06 t 37' 0.08 1 0.00 1 ST 3,200 3,200 238 0.07 0' 0.07 36 0.09 0.00 SR 1,600 1,600 31 0.05 0 0.05' 0 0.05 0.00 EL 1,600 - 1,400 271 0.11 Oft . 0.17 12 0.18' 0.00 ET 3,200 3,200 86B 0.18 1 0 0.38 ;. 55 0.42 1 0.00 1 ER 0 0 354 0.00 0 0.00 56 0.00 0.00 WL 1,600 1.600 74 0.05 1 0 0.05 1 0 0.05 t 0.00 1 WT 3,200 3,200 169 0.14 0 0.14 64,;') 6.17 0.00 WR 0 0 279 0.00 0 0.00 32 0.00. 0.00 ICU= 0.70- 0.70 0.77 0.00 LOS= B B C ' A Notes: `' a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical mavement. b) LOS z Level Of Service. c) Bass traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 VPH/lane. AFA Prr'rct Number 184,001 Calc.Date: 01/2219.0 1NIE'R5ECI10H G A P A C I T Y 0TILi1AT10.4 ANALYSI5 City of: Rancho_Cucamonga - HIS Street: I-15 SB Ramps E/N Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Coditions .Background+Alternative B AN Peak Hour Volumes,-.-' - Proposed Modification.Hone (Existing Conditions) Baekground Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL " TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hnur VIC Hour Ratio Ratiz J Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w(Exist Lanes w/Pop Lanes' "L 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0_ 0.00 t 0.00 1 4T 0 0 `0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 NR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 9 0.00 0 0.00 121 0.00 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.53 4 0 0.53 A 0 0.56 1 0.00 4 � . SR 0 0 1673 0.00 0. 0.00_� �; 0 '0.00 4.00 EL 0 _0 0 0.00 F, 0 0.004 0 0.00 1 0.00 t, i Ei 4,800 4,200 351 0.07 0 0.07 . 241 0.12 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 S'46 0.34 0 0.34 0 0.34 0.00 UL' 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 HT 4,800 4,800 1135 0.24 1 0 0.24 1 161 0.27 1 0.06 ! HR 1,600 1,600 189 O.12 0 0.12 209 0.25 0:00 ICU= 0.77 0.77 0.83 01.00 LOS= C C D A Notes: a)Asterisk M indicates critical movement. b) LO5=Level Of'Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane �1 AEA Project Number 289.001 Calc.➢ate: '01122190 "C J1 • j.B I,N T E R 5 E C I 1 0 N CAPACITY UTIL17AI10,: ' AN 4 LY5IS_ City:of. Pancho bcacvnga ' = HIS Street. I 1G Ld iasp0 E/)!Street: Foothill d1Yd Volume Conditions: Background+.Alternative B PN Peak Hour ?roposed Modification: None (Ezisting,Conditions) Background } 1:- CumpIat BACKGROUND Project MAC_ TOTAL` Peak BACKGROUND Peak 3 CU)1ULATIVE Peak VIC'-I VIC ` Exi:tino Proposed Hour VIC hdur VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume a/Exist Lanes xlProp Lanes NL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 Jt OO t 0 0.00 1 0.00 i !IT 0 0 0 n.00 0 0:00 0 0.00 .100 NR e 0 0 Oleo 0 0.00 0 0,00 0.00 SL 0 0 17 ' ' 0.00 Q Oleo 195 iGi"o 0.6o STD 3,2100 3,200 0 0.16ld 0 0.16! 0 �0.22 t 0.00 t SR 0 0 5!!= ,0.00 0 0 00< 0 0 0o 0.00, EL 0 0 0 G.Oo ?0 0.00 ' 0 .0.00 t Me t ET 4,600 4,800 1508 0.31 t 0 0.31,t 389„ 0.40 Oleo i ER 1,600 1;600 1444 0.50 0 0.90 0 0.90 e.00 AL 0 0 0' 0.00 t 0 O.00.K 0 0.00 0.00, NT 4,800 4,800 216 0.17 0 0.17 377 0 25 ," 0.00 aR 1.600 1,600 '192 0.12 0 , 0:12, 471,. 6.41 t 0.00 t ICU= 0.47 0.47 0.63 0.00 Notes:_ a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical sovtrvv?:. h) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 2G9.001 CaIc:4Date. 01/22/90 t( INIERSEC? 13N CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS, City of: Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street: I-15 NB Raps EIN Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Aitemative B AN Peak Hour Proposed Mcdificatio.q-0one (Existing Conditions) Background /;ueulat BACKBROUN9 Project TOM TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic VIC Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hoar, VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Caoacxty Vo•"uma Ratio Volume Ratio Volute alExist Lanes; n/?rop Lanes NL 0 0 791 Oleo 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 NT 3,200 3,200 0 0.33 t 0 0.33 t 0 0.42 t 0.00 t 1 NS 0 0 244 oleo J 0.00 301 0.00 0.00 SL 0 v 0 0 oleo t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 ter,., 0,00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 oleo `� Q. 0.00 0� 0.06 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,Bo0 112 0.05 0 0.05 362 0.10 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 240 0.16 0 0.16 0 0.16 Oleo y WL 0 0 0 :0.00 '0 _ 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 HT 4,EOO 4,800 527 0.11 t 0 0.11 t 376 0.19 I oleo t HR 1,600 1,600 32 0.05 0 0.05 83 0.07 0.00 ICU= 0.44 0.44 0.61 0.00 LOS= A A B Notes- a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. i cl Base traffic volumes saurce. AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane ': AFA?roiect Number 2B9.001 Calc, Date.-4- 01/22/90 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILI14TION ANALYSIS City cf: Rancho Cccamonga' Jf NIS Street, I-15 NB Ramps EIN Street: FooOpl Blvd Vo1s�e Conditions: Backgroundt Alternative B Ph Peak Hour Proposed"Modification: None (Existing Conditions) - Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CURULATIVE Peak Vic VIC Existing Proposed Hour Vic Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio. Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio 441.�Ime Ratio Volume mlExist Lanes aiProp Lanes, NL 0 0 607 0.00 0 Oleo 0 0 n 0.00 NT 3,200 3,200 0 0.31 f 0 0,31 Y 0 0.46 1 0.00 S NR 0 0 387 0.00 0 0.00 496 0.0 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 4- 04 0.00 d Oleo t' ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 O;�rJ 0 '0.00 4' 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 6 00 i 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0.00 1 ET 4,800 4,800 276 (( 0.06 0 0.06 584 o.IB 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 1323 t 0.83 0 0.03 0 0.83 0.00 , kL 0 0 0 „,O.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 maim AT 4,BOO 4,800 421 0.49 if 0 0.09 E 848 0.26 t 0.00 t. RR 1,600 1,600 119 0.07 0 0.07 In 0.19 O.OQ ICU= 0.40 0.40 0.72 oleo LOS= A A C A Note•. a) Asterisk M indicates critical movement. ' b)'LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 UPH/Lane Q 1 AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc.Date: 01/22190 IN'TERSECT10It CAPACITY 0TILIIATI0N ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street: Etixanda Ave E/N Street; Foothill Bive ,t. Vaivae Conditions: Background +Alternative D AM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None (E%isting Conditions) Background Cuoulat BACKSROUND Project TOTAL. 70TAL Peak BACK6ROUNH Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic Vic Existing Proposed Hour V/C Hour V/C flour Ratio Ratio B Irvement Capacity Capacity Vo)u•.e Ratio Volume Ratio Volume u/Wst Lanes elProp Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 110 0.07 1 0 0.07 1 0 6,07 1 0.00 1 T ,200 3,200 259 0.09 0 0.09 30 0.11 0.00 NR 0 0 "22 0100 0 0.00 !'1 30 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 227 0.14 0 OJ4 0 0,14 0.00 ST 1,200 3,200 939 0.27 1 0 0�27 i 40 0.31 t 0,00 t 5R 0 0 33 0.00 U 0100 'C 91 0.00 M EL 1,600 1,600 51 0.05 1 0 0.05 1 54 0.07 1 0.00 1 ET 3,200 3,200 1% 0.01 0 0.09 53 0.11 t 0.00 1 ER 0 0 62 0.00 0 0,00 5 0.00 0.00 kL 1,600 1,600 140 0.09 0 0.09 41 0.11 1 0.00 1> 'AT 4,S00 4,S00 421 0.14 t 0 0.14 t so 0.15 t 0.00 1` KR 0 0 227 0.00' 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.53 0.53 9.60 0.00 A A A Notes a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=LeveI Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIH-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane 'I AFA Project Number 284- rat Calc. Date: 01/22/90 INTER5ECT10N CAPACIIY' ll'(ILIIATI0N ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga 4/S Street: Etiwanda Ave itW Street: Foothill Blvd* Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative B PM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: Nore (Existing Conditions)' Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak " BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C VIC E.isting Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC, ' Hour Ratio Ratio r' Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Vdlume Ra'h Volume o/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes 0 NL 1,600 1,600 208 0.13 0 0.13 0 0.13 0.00 IT 31200 3,200 6-7 0.23 t 0 0.25 t 70 0.21 1 0.00 t NR 0 0 148 0.00 0 0.00 b4 0.00 0.00 _? SL 1,600 1,600 514 0.32 t 0 0.32 t 0 0,32 t 0.00 t ST 3,200 3,200 331 0.11 0 0.11 64 0.17 0.00 SR 0 ' 0 33 0.00 0 0.00 130 0.00 ?110 EL 1,600 1,600 114 0.07 0 0.07 419 0.15 4 ET 3,200 3,200 469 0.17.3_ 0 0.17 t 119 0.21 1 O.00 t ER 0 0 68 0.00 0 0.00 15 0.00 0.00 NL 1,600 1,600 18 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 64 0.05 t 0.00 t Amml HT 4,800 4,900 268 0.09 0 0.09 130 0.11 t 0.004 AR 0 0 151 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.79 0.19 0.87 0.00 Los=~' C C D A Notes: a) Asterisk (0 indicates critical pavement. 5)LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane 1 AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc. Date: 01/22/90 } r, INTERSECTION CAPAGITY UIILIZATI0N AIIA:,Ly.515 City of;Rancho Cucamonga , NUS Street: Etiwanda Ave E/W Streek, Arrow Hxv Volume Conditions: Background +Alternative B AN Peak Hour Proposed Modif cation: None (Existing Conditions); �[ Cuaulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL" TOTAL Background Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V/C E Existing Proposed Hour Vic Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Y,ovemert Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Voluae w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes f! NL 1,600 L,600 463 ' 0.29 1 0 0.27 1 36 0.31 t 0.00 t NIT 3,200 3,200 141 0.07 0 0,07 24 0.08 0.00 NR 0 0 80 0.00 0 0.00 0` 0.00 0i EL 1,600 1,600 232 0.18 0 0.10 20 0.20 0 06,_" ST 3,200 3,200 487 0.15 0 O.iS 19 0.16 0.00 SR 1,600 1,600 361 0,23 1 0 0.23 i r'.Q 0.23 i 0.00 i EL 1,600 1,600 16 0.05 IL 0.05 tr 5 0.05 t 0.00 t ET 3,200 3,200 247 0.10 D' 0.10(, 22 0.11 0.00 ER 0 0 61 0.00 0 0.00 23 0.00 A O.GO WL 1,600 1,600 170 0.11 0 0.11 0 1.11 0.00 WT 3,200 3,200, 927 0.35 t 0 0.35 1 36 OX # 0.00'1 WR 0 0 ISO 0.00 0 O Go 24 '-1.00 0.00 it ICU= 0.87 037 0.91 0.00 LOS= D 0 E A !� Notes: ) Asterisk ti) indicates critical movement. o)LOS=Level Of Service. 0 Base traffic voluaes source:' AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane ri APA ProjectAum6er 289.001 Calc: Date: v/22/9Q INTERSECTION CAPACITY '0T,ILIZAT10Y AAALYIII City of: Rancho Cucamonga HIS Street: Etiwanda Ave EIY Street: Arrow Huy Volume Conditicps: Background+Alturnative B PM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: Hone (Existing Conditions) Background CumuIat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V/C P IC Hour V/C Hour- Ratio Ratio Existing ro used -. Hour V r Movement Capacit Capacity Volute Ratio Voluus Ratio Volume- w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 1,600 1,660 113 0.07 "0 0.07 58 0.11 0.00 !IT 3,200 3,200 00 0.21 t 0 0.21 t 39 0.22 1 0.00 t tR 0 0 192 0.00 0 0100 0 0.00 0.00 j SL 1,600 1,600 97 0.06 1 0 0.06 t 45 ST 3,200 3,200 238 : 0.07 0 0.07 45' 0.09, 0.00 BR 1,600 11,600 31 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.05 0.00 EL 1,600 1�600 271 6.17 0 0:17 15�. 0.18 0 ET 3,200 _3,200 868 0.38 t 0 0.35 t 49 MI 1 0,60 t ER 0 0 354 0.00 0 0.00 49 0.00 0.00 BL 1,600 1,600 74 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 0.00 i HT 3,200 3,200 169 0.14 0 0.14 58 OX 0.00 NR 0 0 279 0.00 0 000 39 0.00 0.00 ICU`= 0.70 0.74 -0.77 0.00 LOS= 2 B C A Notes: a)Asterisk M indicates critical movement. e)LOS=Level Of Service. 0 Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC INC. d)Capacity based on 1600 VPN/Lane AFA Project Number 2B9.001 r Calc. Date: 01122/90 i INTERSECTION CA,PAC1TY U T I L I I A T 1 0 N ANALYSIS 1 City of: Rancho C+ucamonga Si N/5 Street: I-15 So Ram E/W Street. Foothill Blvd ' Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative C AM Peak Hour Volumes Prvnosed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKBROUVO Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak WE WE Existing Proposed Hour Vic Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Me -dent Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio 'Volume x/Exist Lanes #/Prop:LaneS NL 0 `0 A 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 - 0.00 t 0.00 t IT 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 00 0 0.00 ` 0.00 !R 0 0 8 0.00, 0 0.00 Q Q.00 0.00 EL 0 0 4 0.00 0 0.00 43 - ' 0.00 0.00 ' ST ;,200 3,200 0 0.53 1 0 0.53 t 0 0.55 t 0.00 t SR 0 0 1673 0.00 01- 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0.00 I ET 4,600 4,800 151 0.07 0 0,07 187 0.11 0.00 ER 1,660 1,600 546 0.34 0 0.34 _ 0," -0.34 0.00 WL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 `tr `;.,o 0.00 NT 4,800 4,800 1135 0.24 4 0 0.24 t 104 0.26 t 0.00 1.; 0 1.600 1,600 I84 0.12 0 0.12 13C 0.20 0.00 ICU= 0.77 0.77 0.81 0.00 (( L➢5= C C ➢ A Notes a)Asteris6 (1) indicates critical movement. b)LOS=Lel,el Of Service. Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity ba_ed an 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 289.001 • Calc. Date: W22/40 1'' h INTfRSECIIBN' ?CAPAC3Ty 0 T I L I I A T 1 0 N ANALYS18 i City of: Rancho Cucac�nga N/S Street: 1-15 SB Raaps E1W Street:foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Backaround+Alternative C PM P=_ak Hour Volu:es Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cusulat BACKGROUND Pro;-C ' MAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak 'We Vic Existing Proposed Hour Vic Hour V/C flour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0.00 1 l IT 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 NR 0 0 0 0.00 a) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 17 0.00 0 0.00 ISO 0.00 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.16 t 0 0.16 t 0 ,tr0.22 t 0.40 I I1 SR 0 0 505 0.00 0 Y)Oo 0 ,0.00 z 0.00 EL C 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 t 0.00 E ET 4,800 4,800 1508 0.31 3: 0 0.31 t : 360 ' 0.39 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 1444 0.90 0 0:90 0 0.90 0.00 NL 0 0 0 000 4 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 0.00 NT 4,000 4,800 836 0.17 0 0.17 360 0.25 0.00 YR 11600 1l600 192 0.12 0 0.12 450 0.40 t 0.00 t ICU= 0.,47 0.47 0.62 0.00 LOS= A A B A Notes: a) Asterisk (4) indicates critical soveeent. b) LOS=Level Of Service. 1 c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. = q, c d) Capacity based on 1600 VPN/Lane �_�` APA Project Number 289.001 ;�� Catr.Date: 01722J90 i IHTEPSE ,;, RN CAPACITY UTILIIAIION ANALYSI5 City of:Rancho Cucamonga !U5 Street: I-15 NB Ramps EtA Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative C AN Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: None tE.,isting Conditions) Background Cueulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULiTIVE Peak Vic We Existing Proposed Hour VtC Hour VIL Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio 4aluse w/Exist Lanes ulPrap Lanes ,4 IL 0 "0 747 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 NT 3.200 3,:00 0 0.33 t 0 0.33 t 0 0.40 t 0.00 t NR 0 0 244 0.00 " 0 O.DD 234 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 O.OD 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,B00 112 0.05 0 0.05 200 0.08 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 248 0.16 0 0.16 0 0.16 6.00 1JL 01 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 BT 4,000 yoo 527 0.11 1 0 0.11 4 234 0.16 t 0.00-t o-F iR 1.,600 1,600 32 0.05 0. 0.05 52 0.05 0.00. ICU=- 0.44 0.44 0.56 0:00 LDS= A A A A c /fin Notes: a1 Asterisk It) indicates critical movement. 6) LOS=Level Of Sarvice. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPHfLane AFA Project Numh.r 287,001 Catc. Late: 011122140 INTERSECTION CAPACITY 0TILIiAT10N ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street: 1-15 NR Ramps E/B Street: Foothq) Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+ Alternative C FA-Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification:None (Existing Conditions) Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULAIIVE Peak Vic Vic Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour V/C ;dour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume 4 do Voluee Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 W Q.0o 0 0.00 0 0,00 0.00 IT --,200 Z,200 0 0.31 l 0 0.31 t 0 0.45 t 0.00 t NR 0 0 387 1.00` 0 0.00 450 0.00 Oleo SL 0 0 0- 0.00 t 0 0.00 4 0 0.00 t 0.00# ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 V.00 oleo SR. 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 040 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,800 276 0.06 0 0.06 540 0.17 0.00 ER 1}600 1,600 1323 0.83 D 0.03 4 0.83 0.00, j NL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Oleo YT 4,800 4,800 421 0.04 t 0 0.09 t 810 0.1.6 1 0.00 t 9R 1,600 1.600 119 0.07 0 0.07 ISO 0.15 0.00' 1 lcU= 0.40 0,40 0.71 0.00 LDS= A A C A a Notes( a) Asterisk (1) indicaits critical movement. 6) LOS=Level Pf Service. cl Base traffic volumes source: . AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. dl Capacity based on 1600 VPH!ane AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc.Late: 01MMO r' INTERSrCTL�UN CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS City of Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street. Etiwanda Ave EIH Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions 8.0ground +Alternative C AM Peak Hour VoIures Proposed Modification: Non6 {Existing Conditions? Baekotourd', Cusulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAe--"' Peak JACKGROUN➢ P-2ak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic : VIC =xsting Proposed Hour V/C Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio M07eCent Capacity Capacity V.,ume I;atio .Volume Ratio Vakume b/Exist Lanes a/Prop Lanes NL 1,660 11,,d0 110 0.07 t 0 0.07 t "U 0,14 t 'tT 3,200 3,200 259 0.09 0 0.49 16 %10 0.00 NR 0 0 22 0.00 0 0.00 13 0,A0 0.00 SL 1.600 1,600 .: 229 0.14 0 0.14 0 0.�4 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 839 0.27 1 0 0.27 t 27 0.30 t 0.00 t SR 0 -'-,' 33 0.00 0 0.00 66 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 51 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 36 0.05 0.00 ET 3,200 3,200 196 0.09 0 P.09 39 0.15 t 0.00 1 ER 0 0 82 0.00 0 0.00 160 0.00 0.00 kL 1.600 1,600 140 0.09 0 0.09 9 0.09 t 0.00 t NT 4,800 4,800 421 0.14 t 0 0.14 t 84 C'O.iS 0.00 'OR 0 0 227 0.00 A 0.00 0 0.00 0.00. ICU= 0.53 0.53 0.69 0.60 LDS= A A B_ A Notes: a) Asterisk M indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. ` 0 Rase traffic voivaes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. al Capacity based an 1600 MPH/Lane AFA Project Mumber 287.001 Calc Pate 01/22/90 \ �1 [E INTER SE CTI0N GAPACIIY UTIL12ATI0)I AN'ALY615 City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: Etimanda Ave Ell:Street: Foothill Blvd volume Conditions: Background +Alternative C PM Peak Hour Volumes p r Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) E t Background Cumulat 9ACK6ROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VLC V!C Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour V!C !tour Ratio Ratio' ' Noveoent Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio volume Ratio Volume elExist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 248 0.13 17 0 0.13 376 OX 0.00 E NT 3,200 3,2D0 637 0.25'-t 0 0.25 t 64 0.28 t 0.00 t NR 0 0148 0.00 0 0.00 45 0.00 0.00 11. 1,600 1',b00 514 0.32 1 0 0.32 t 0 r 0.32 t 0 00't r ST 3,200 3,200 331 0.11 0 0.11 52 0.17 0.00 ' SR 0 0 33 0.00 0 0.00 128 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 114 0.07 0 0.07 116 0.14 `0.00 ET 3,200 3,200 469 0.17 t 0 ox t 135 0.1 29 a 0400 1 4 ER 0 4 68 0,00 0 0s00 272 WL 1,600 1,600 18 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 45 0 09 t� % NT. 4,800 4,800 68 0.09 0 0'.09 135 0 ,2- ,'Q0 WR 0 0 151 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.79 0.79 0.94 0.!1 LOS= C C E A I Notes: -i) Asterisk(t) indica.es cnt:cal novement. j,y LOS=Level Of Service -) Base traffic volumes source: t9ST1!rFOUST ASSOC, INC. d; Capacity based on 1600 VKW(ane AFA Project Huber 289.001 ��� '�.":` Calc. Date; olh2196 1� 6 �...f ir, f� : INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILi2AT10N 'AgALY3/IS City of: Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street: Etiwanda Ave E1W Street,_Arrow Nay f Volume Conditions: Background 4 Alternative C AF:Peak,Haur Valuses./ 1 ' Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditi6ns) %- Background Cumulat BACKGROUND{ Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +'CUMULATIVE Peak V1C Vic Existino Proposed Hour V1C Hour We Hour Ratio Ratio ;fovement Capacity Capacity Voluse Ratio Volume Ratio Volute wlExist Lanes it/Prop Lans NL 1,600 1.600 463 0127 1 0 0.294 9 0 30 Nr 3,200 3,200 141 0.07 i'0 0.07 38 049 " 0.00 9R 0 0 B0 Q.DO \f ` '' 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 1,SO4 1,600 292 O.Ir-` 0 0.is 21 0.20 0.00 ST 3,Y00 3,200 487 1 I _4 0.15 22 0.16 0.00 SR 1,600 I'm761 0.23 1 0 0.23 1 148 0.32 1 0.00'1 EL 1,600 1,600 16 0.05 1 0 0.05 t 90 0.07 1 0.00 t ET 3,200 3,200 247 x 0 0 0.10 4 0.10 0.00 ER 0 0 61 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.00 0.00 r HL 1,600 !,boo 170 "I'm 0 0.11 Q 0.11 0.00 WT 3,200 3,200 927 0.35 1 0 0.35 1 27 0,36 1 0.00 1 WR 0 0 Igo 0.00 f:0 0.00 20 0.00 0.00 ' ICU= 0,87 0.87 9.9B 0.00 LOS= 9''' D E A l' Notes, eil a)Asterisk M indicates critical movesent. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 VPHKane AFA Project Nusber 2B9.001 Calc.. Date: 0112.190 f.. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UT ILI ?AI10N ANALYSI5 CiL,%of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: Etiwaada Ave E/W Srrent: Arrow Nay Volume Ccr.ditlotis: Background+Alternative C PM Peak Nour Volutes Propose!hdiltlOtioh, None (Existing Conditions): Cackgraund Cutulat BACKGROUND Project 4 TOTAL TOTAL, Peak BACKGROUND . Peak +CUMULATIVE _Peak VFC V/a -existing Proposed Pour VIC Hour V C , Hour Ratio raiiq Movement Capacity Capacity Volute Ratio Volume Ratio �Volwe. w/Exist Lanea,.,B/Prop Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 113 0.07 07 OM4 .07 0.00 NT 3,200 3,200 490 0.214, 0 0.21, t f 0.24 1 0.00 t NR 0 0 192 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.06 0.00 5L 1,600 1,600 p7 0.06 t 0 L9�"'6 d 61 0.10 t 0.00 t ST 3,200 3,200 238 0.07 0 0.07 80 0.10 0.00 SR 1,600 1,600 31 0.05 0 0.05 234 - 0.17 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 271 0.17 0 0.17, 33z 0.38 1 6.00 1'. ET 3,200 3,200 068 0.39 t 4- 0.38 t 29 0.39 0_00 ER 0 0 354 0.00 0 0.00 10tir 0.00 0.00 WL 1.600 1600 74 0.05 1 0 0.05 t 0 0.05 0.00 WT 3,200 3,200 169 0.14 0 0..14 10 0,17 t 1.00 1 AR 0 0 279 0.00 0 0.00, '60 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.70 040 0.89 MID LOS= B B D A Notes'. Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. bj LOS=Level Of Service. cl Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. dj Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Humber 289.001 Calc.,Date: 01/22/90 a.� Mn t , INTERSECIIO7) CAPACITY U T I L I Z A T�10NARAL SI5 City of; Rancho Cucamonga N/S Sirsct 1-15 59 Raaps f' EIM Street: Foothill Blvd; Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative D AM Peak flour Volumes Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Y Background tumulat BACKGROUND „Proiect TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +MULATWE Peak V/C Mr Existing Proposed Hour VIC lour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio e vement Capacity Capatity Volume Ratio Volume -Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes k/Prop.Lanes 11 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 i 0 1 0.00 t 0.00 1 14T 0 0 0 J.00 s � ) 0.00 0 6.00 0.00 HR 0 0 0 0.0u ' Y' ^; 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 4 000 0 0:44 94 0 00 0.04 0 � ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.S3 1 0 0.53 i 0 0.56 t 0;00 1 SR 0 0 1673 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0:00 1 0 0.004 0.00 t ET 4,000 4,600 351 0107 0 0.07 07 0A1 0140, ER 1,600 1,600 546 034 0 0.34 0 0.34 0.00 flL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 VO NT 4,600 4,800 1135 0.24 t 0 Q:'24 103 0,26 t 0.00 t AR 1,600 1,600 104 0.IY 0 j1M2 12� 0.20 0.00 r ICU= 0.77 e.77 0.02 0.00 LOS= C C D A Notes: a)Asterisk (1) indicates,-,ritical movement. 6) LOS:Level Of Service. -) Base traffic volumes sou~ce: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d)Capacity based on 1601 Wq/Lane AFA Proiect N3a6er 289.001 } Calt. Date: 01/22/40 J I =' 1 ,y r I41ERSECTI'0N 'CAPACITY U T 1 L I I A T 1 0 N ANALY°iS nip � a. City uf: Rancho Cucamonga ' H/S Streett 1-15 SB`Ramps E/Y Street: Foothill B14 Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative D PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: Hone (Existing Conditions) _ Background Cumulat BACKSROUHD Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BAC1111116 Peak + CUMULATIVE Peak U/D VIC xistinm Proposed Hour VX Hour V/C Four Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Win Volume Ratio Volume nlExist Lanes a/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 0 0.00 i( 0 0.00 t. 0 0.06 1 0.00 tr IT 0 0 0 0.0! k�o 0 00 0 0.00 0.06 NR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0A10 0 0.00 0.00 S(. 0 0 17 0.00 `0 0.00 163 0.00- 0.00 ST 3x200 3,200 0 Oab t 0, 0,16 t 0 0.22 t 0.00 t SR 0. 0 505 000 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL. 0 i;0 0 0.00 0 6.00 0 0.00 t 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,860 1508 0.31 t 0 0.31 t 365 110.39 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 1444 0.90 0 090 0 0.90 0.00 NL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0°jj00 t 0 0.00 0.00 wT 4,100 4,800 836" 0.17 0 f 17 366 0.25 0.90 i SR 1,600 1,600 192 0.12 0 0.12 451 0.40 0.00 t ICU= 0.47 %47 0.62 0.00 LOS= A' 11 A B A ® Notes: a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c,:,Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST AS506, IN . d) Capacity,based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 287.001, 'Calc. Date: 01122190 i' j;^ f INTERSECTION. CAPACITY UTILIIAI10N ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga WS Street: I-15 NB Ramps E1B Street, Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions:Background+Alternative B AN Peak Hour Volumes i Proposed Modification; None (Existing Conditions) Background Cumulat BACKGROUND `project TOTAL TOTAL J1 Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC V/C ,® xisting Proposed Hour V/C Hour V/C Hour Patio Ratio lti Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Vmame w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 797 0..00 0 0.00 _ 0 0.00 0,00 G ti `!T 3,200 y200 0 0.33 1 0 0.33 I 1 0.40 t_ 0.00 E NR 0 `< 0 244 0.00 '' 0 0.00 234 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.004 0 0.00 t` 0.00't ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 1 0 4:00 1 0 0.00 t 0.00 1 ET 4,B00 4,800 112 0.05 0 0.05 281 0.08 0100 ER 1,600 1,600 24B 0.16 0 0.16 0 O.i6 0.00 aL 0 0 0_ 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 AT 4,800 4,800 527 0.11 ! "'0 0.11 2 232 0.16 t 0.00 t AR 1,600 1,600 32 0.05 C 0.05 52 0.05 0.00 ® ICU= 0.44 0:4 0.56 0.00 �i LOS= A A A A ji ® notes: a) Asterisk M indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of`evice. 0 Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 2B9.O01 ) Calc.Date: 01/22/90 { f INTERSEC'3"20)t CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALY.EI5 City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street, I-15 NB Ramps EIN 5�treet: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative D PH Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Hu,ification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic V/C Existing Proposed Hour we Hour -V/C Hour Ratio Ratio ® Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume . Ratio Volume w/Exist�Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 L07 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ' NT 3,200 3.200 0 O 31 t 0 0.31 t Or 0.45 t 0.00 t NR 0 0 357 0.00 0 0.00 457 0.00 0.00 ' i (( SL 0 0 0 0.00 a 0 0.00 1 0 6.00 s L ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.06 0 0.00 0.00 SR 0 : 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 O.DD t 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,800 276 0.06 0 0.06 548 0.17 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 1323 0.83 0 1� 0.83 0 0.83 0.00 bL 0 0 0 0.00 0��{ 0.00 ,, 0 0:00 0.00 i J j NT 4,900 4,800 421 0.04 t ;0 0.04 t oil 0.26 t 0.00 t. kR 1,600 1,6"v'- 114 0.07 ��0 0.07 180 0.19 0.00 ® ICU= 0.40 0.40 0.71 0.00 - LOS= A A J C A Notes: a) Asterisk ft) indicates critical movement. t) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc. Date: 01/22/40 �,r INTER9�'C'T10N CAPACITY UT,ILIIA<TTON ANAt._Yr1-3 City'Of.- Rancho Cucaaonga, HIS Street: Etiwanda Ave E/N Street. Foothill Blvd Volume Caoditicnst Backgrwd +Alternative O AN Peak Hour Voluses r Proposed Modification: None (Existing Canditicas) Background Cuaulat BWCK DUNG Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUNULAT(VE Peak WC VIC Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC Hour -Ratio Ratio Moment Capacity Capacity Volume Ratigf Volume Ratio Volume u/Exist Lanes w/Frap Lanes I NL 1y600 1,600 110 0.07 i 0 0.07 1 110 0.14 1 040 1 NT 3,200 3,200 259 0.09 ���� O 0:09 16 0.10 MO 0 22 0.00 '1 0 0.00 13 0.00 0.00 St 1,600 1,600 229' 0.14 0 0.14 4 0,14 0.00 Sr 3,200 3,200 839 0.27 1 0 6.27 1 27 0.30 1 0.00 Y SR 0 0 33 0.00 0 0.00 67 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 51 0.05 t 0 0.05 36 0.05 0.00 ET 3,200 3,200 196 0.05 , 0 0.07 39 0.15 t 4.00� ER 0 0 82 0.00 0 0.00 160 0.000 AI F NL 1,600 1,600 140 0.01 0 0.09 9 0.o 1 0.00 t }y l f WT 4,600 4,800 421 0.14 4 0 0.14 t 85 0.15 0.00 BR 0 0 227 0.00 ;_ 0 DY90: 0 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.53 0.53 Q.68 0.00 LOS= A A B A ' if ifs ra �\k Notes.: / a) Asterisk{;l indicates critical sovement. h) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic voluees source: AUSTIH-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d)Capacity based on 1600 Mihane AFA Project Number 289.001 Caic, Date: W22I90 11 a 111TERS'EC1I0N CAPACITY UT IL17ATI011 ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street:Etiwanda Aver EIY Street:Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternatite D PH Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Projec \� TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak t CUMULATIVE Peak `. VIC VIC ® Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC Hour �q Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume: . ist Lanes wIProp Lanes NL 1,600 1.600 208 0.13 0 0.13 323'� 11.37 0.00 NT 3,200 3,200 637 0.25 t 0 0.35 t 6�r s �0.78'1 0.0.0 t aft 0 0 148 0.00 0 0.00 45 \• b,00 0.00 2 0.17 ! 0,00 t ST 3.200 3i200 331 O.li 0 0.11 5 aL i 600 1 600 514 0.32 t 0 0.32 t 2 0.17 0,00 SR 0 0 33 0.00 0 0.00 131 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 114 0.07 0 0.07 116 0.14 0.00 ET 3,200 3,200 468 0.17 1 0 0.17 t 135 0.30 t 0.00 t ER 0 0 68 0.00 0 0.00 273 0',00 0.00 NL 1,600 1,600 18 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 45 0�15 t 0.00 t j kT 4,800 4,800 268 0.09 0 0.09 139 0.12 0.00 OR 0 0 151 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.79 0.79 0.95 Hof ri LDS= C C - A' 4otes: a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. dl Capacity based on 1600 VPHILane 1' AFA Project Number 289.001 CaIc.Date: .- 01/22/90, I H T E R S E C T I D N CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS " City off-,7ancho Cucamonga N/5 Street: Etiwanda Ave 'c!N Street: Arrow Hwy Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative 0 AM Peak Hour Volumes }i Proposed Modification:lone (Existing Conditions)' Il ; Background rumulat BACKGROUND 'Project 70TAL :-',_TOTAL Peak 1ACKGROUND 'Peak,'4 CUMULATIVE Peak Vic V/C Existing Proposed Hour VTC Huur V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume 'Ratio' Volume wi.Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL, i,600 1.600 463 OM 4 9 �.30 2 0.00 x IT 1,111 1,101 141 0.07 0 0.07 38 0.03 0.00 SIR 0 0 SO 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 C\ SL 1,6000 1,600 292 0.18 0 0.18 22 =;',�,.�20 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 487 0.15 0 0.15 22 0.16 0.00 SR 1,606 1,600 361 0.23 t 0 0.23 1 1.47 ' 0.32 t 0.00 t v 1,600 1,600`_; 16 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 90 0.07 t 0.00 t ET 3,200 3,200 247 0.10 0 0.10 4 0.10 0.00 ER 0 0 61 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.00 0.00 ' BL 1,600 1,600 170 0.11 0 0.11 0 0.11 0.00 WT 3,200 3,200 927 0.35 t 0 5 35 t 27 0.36 t 0.00 t NR 0 0 _88 0.00 0 01)0 19 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.87 0.87 0.98 0.00 LOS= D D F A Notes: a)Asterisk it) indicates critical movement. h) LOS=Level Of Service. 0 Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane /1 AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc. Date: 01122/9,0 .i "tf INTERSECT10H CAPACITY UTILIZA710N ' ANALY5 City of: Rancho Cucamonga r N/S Street: Etiwanda Ave 41 EIW Street: Arrow Hay 1 Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative S PH Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: Hone (Existing Condit ,a) me Background Cemulat BACKGROUND' Project TOTAL TOTAL -Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CLMULATIVE Peak V1C Vic Existing Proposed f'Haur Vic Your V/C Hour Ratio Ratio s�® movement Capacity Capacity ,:`Volume Ratio V o I a el Ratio Volume wiExist Lanes elProp lanes HL 1,600 1,600 113 0.07 0 0,07 4 0.07 0.00 NT 3.20Q 3,20Q °8Q 0.21 t Q 0,2ss t B7 0.24 1' 0.00 t NR C 0 172 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 97 0.06 t 0 0.06 t 61 0.10 t 0.00 t ST _3,200 3,200 238 0.07 0' 0.07 e0 0.10 0.00 SR 1,600 1,600 31 0.05 0 0.05 235 0.17 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 271 0.17 0 0.17 337 0.39 t 0.00 t ET 3,200 3,200 968 0.38.t 0 0.38 t 29 0.19 0.00 ER 0 0 354 0.00 0 0.00 10 0.00 0.00 WL 1,600 1,600 74 0.05 t 0 OA t 0 0.05 0.00AM I WT 3,200 3,200 169 0.14 0 0.14 10 0.17 t 0.00 f kR 0 0 279 0.00 0 0.00 81 0.00 9.00 . ICU= 0.70 0.70 0.89 0.00 LO5= B H D `- A Notes: ) Ast-risk M indicates critical movement. b)LOS=Level Of Service. r1 Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC, d) Capacity based on 1600 VPHILane I� i AEA Project Humber '289.001 Ca1c.Date: 01122/90 I <, ME .4IMIMA011ST AMO 9TES, INC. rRAFF.JC fN'GJNEFRANG AN,* rRANSPORrArios PLANNING 202W NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE • SANTA ANA,'CALIFORNIA 92701 • TELEPHONE(714)667-04% fAX(714)667-7952 September 25,1990 The Pees Companies 22709 Aspan Street,Suite 701 Lake Forest-EI Toro, CA 92630 ' ATTENTION. Mr.Dan Plies SUBJECT: COMMERCE PARKWAY CROSS•SECITON Dear Mr.Plies DrMol "iCTION In January 1990 Austin Foust Assoziates,Inc.,prepared a traffic study for tl:e Commerce Parkway Centre development in Rancho Cucamonga. That study evaluated the areawide impacts of project traffic but did not specifically address internal circulation other than to indicate Commerce Parkway should not be Considered a truck route a,,A signage should be provided to prevent its becoming such. The question is now asked "What should be the cross-section of Commerce Parkway?" ANALYSIS Trip generation for the project ranges from 39,600 ADT up to 47,000 ADT depending upon the alternative land use in question. Peak hour:volumes range from 3,600 to 3,800 total vehicles per hour entering and exiting Ct.--site. Virtually none of this traffic is through traffic. Therefore, Commerce Parkway need not be designed to accommodate 40,000 ADT. Investigation of the peak hour trip assignment of Alternative B (i.e., the highest trip generation option)reveals a 3:1 distribution'between the Foothill and Arrow Highway eptrances. Peak design hour volumes for Commerce,Parkway at Foothill are Z600 vph and SW vph tit Arrow Highway. These volumes indicate that a fire-lane se lion is appropriate on Commerce Parkway at Foothill(two inbound,three outbound with two left-turns and a right-turn lane)whereas a three- lane cross-section(two outbound and one inbound)is adequate at Arrow Highway. For the internal cross-section of Comrn�rce Parkway between the approaches to Foothill and Arrow Highway two( , potential cross-sections are possible. ghese are three lane and four- lane cross-sections. The choice between the two largely dependt iVon whether or not a raised (rt f landscaped median is planned. A ith such a median,a four-lane section would be requrra `t Mr.Dan Plies September 25,1990 Page Two number one lane(inside lams,)in each direction would Function as both a thru-and left-turn Iane serving the various internal parting lot driveways. If,a raised median is not plain cd then a three lane cross-section with the center lane striped as n two-way left-thru lane could,adequately sern`'i the travel demand. In either case,the three-Iane or four-Iane'interibe cross-section of Commerce Parkway must transition into the appropriate"approach"cross section a'few hundm feet in sdvance of the two entrance%zits at Foothill and Arrow Mghway. _ CONCLUSIONS O In summary, it is concluded that based on project trips,the :Toss-section of t'' . rce Parkway needs to be five(S)lanes in advance of Foothill add three(3)lanes the remainder of the segment to Arrow Highway unless a raised median is constructed in which case a four-lane section is appropriate H you have any questions regarding this report please call. Sincerely, 7 E.Fo! P E. Enclosures I i I ti f, P 4 P �J APPENDIX T ® 7 I 1 t �r� f�( ��•_..-_,--�---.-..�-.:� ___.----fit_ ' `'* ��----=----�:5:' 1 sum- lo Ap PRO T A-mi j(,7 fa r Figure 1-9 MCINI Y MAP �1 77 m N E MUM ( 990 I owo , was ' qlm _\ aoh .W d �. ! 9w i i ov _ x I L`. 209 'F M bs- ,67 24,0-a- W .� aga �a ° FooniiLL cp 4° 1563� I. 84 t ' 33� II e 5 h J � 72 ARROW HuY �4 24 36 22 1fe AM c 3 �b 377 ` 389-s Uj ° FOOTHILL qd'250 - �+, er,B 1070 z I A live11 15 o� 4 / 4- ,88 ¢ 848 {,,g 724:-f 4+ 75 h 58s o� Nf � Q:v aJ 116 ARROW IIWY �} ` 292--4- 9 49e o� PM e Figure III-7 PROJECT GENERATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 40 AW T.fMOMFEeL AW. ALTERNATIVE 8 i- n r RA FF/.0 ENGINEERING ANQ TRANSPCRrArIaN P.zANNi&a 2020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE I SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92101 •. TELEPHONE(714)$67-0496 0 FAX.(714)667-7952 May 20,1991 The Plies Companies 22708 Aspan Street,#701 Lake Forest-El Toro,CA 92630 " 1 ATTENTLON• Mr.Dan Plies i SUMECT: COMMERCE PPARB'F AY CONF`x IMAT110N l Dear Mr.Plies: ® In Se trrmber 1990 i prepared,a letf er re Ica attached re ardinvl the cross-sectional P � P P P�' (copy ) g $ design required on Commerce Parkway is Rancho Cucamonga Attached is a copy"of the recommended ge'�metrics required to implement our recommendation From examination of the attached illustration you will note that the respective designs at ' Foothill and Arrow.Highway are straight.forward, but the midblock cross-section allows two alternatives. These are shown as Options 1 and 2. Either of these options"could operate' I satisfactorily. The primary difference is brat a raised median requires additional width to prevent left turning traffic from stopping in and blocking the thru.lane. With thg four-lane/raised median option the number 1(inside)lane sets both as a thru lane and"left-turn lane. ® H you have any questions regardinj these tiesigns,please call. Siacerely, ® /be E. o t,PE EnclasWes cc: Ken Linville,Linville Civii Engineers l a 1 1 p 1 1 ti jib _ W I q { 16 '� � � y IWAI 7RARF/C a,vaialSSINo A'*0 rR:AHSP0Mrgr10R R[AHMl:YO 2020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE • SANTA ANA. CALIFOPNIA 92701 • TELEPHONE(714)®67-N90 f l FAX (714)087i 7952' September 25, 1990 The Plies Companies 22708 Aspaa Street,Suite 701 Lake Forest El'Toro.CA 92630 ® A.TTENT1on Mn Dan plies SU JECT: COMMERCE P °"CROSS-SECUON Dear Ivlr.Plies: INTRODUMON In 3anuary 1990 Austin-Foust Associates,Inc.,prepared a traffic study for the Commerce Parkway Centre development in Rancho Cucamonga. That study evaluated'the areawide Impacts of project traffic but did not specifically address internal circulation other than to indicate Commerce Parkway should not be considered a truck route and signage should be provided to prevent its becoming such. The question is now asked 'What should be the cross-section of Commerce Parkway?' ANALYSIS Trip generation for the project ranges from 39,600 ADT up to 47,000 ADT depending upon the alternative'land use in question. Peak hour volumes range from 3,600 to 3,800 total vehicles per hour entering and exiting the site. Virtually none of this traffic is through.traffic. Therefore, Commerce Parkway need not be designed to;accommodate 40,000 ADT: Investigation of the peak hour trip assignment of Alternative B (Lm, the highest trip generation option)reveals a 3:1 distribution between the Foothill and Arrow Highway entrances. Peak design hour volumes for Commerce Parkway at Foothill are Z600 vph and 800 vph at Arrow Idighway. These volumes indicate.that a five-lane section is appropriate oa Commerce Parkway at Foothill(two inbound,three outbound with two left tuns and a right-tum lane)whereas a three- lane cross-section(two outbound and one inbound)is adequate at Arrow Highway. For the internal cross-section of Commerce Parkway between the approaches,to Voothiil and Arrow Ifighway two(2)potential cross=sections are possible. These are three-lane and rout- ® lane cross-sections. The choice between the two largely depends upon.whether or not a raised landscaped median is planned. With such a median,a four-lane section would be required. The Mr.Dan Plies lIx September 25, i Page Two number one lane(inside lane).in each direction would function as both a thru-and left-turn Iona serving the various internal parking j�t driveways. If a raiccd median is not planned,dean a hree lane cross-section with the center k fie striped as a teem-way left-thru lane could anes;uately serve the raved demand. In either cas%l the three-lane or four-lane°'interior"cross-section of Commerce Parkway must transition into the apETprive`approach'Bross-section q few hundred feet in advance of the two&trancefe:ats at Footuur 6d Arrow+aghWay. GQN(,LUStS2PiS In summary, it is concluded that based on project iUips,;the cross-3eation of t:ommercaa s- U Parkway needs to be fire(5)lanes in advance of Foothill and three(3)lanes the remainder of the segment to Arrow I-Hghway unless a raised median is constructed in whi"h case a four-lane section is appropriate. 1 If you have any questions regarding this report please call., 4 sincerely, : 1 J E.Fo Pa Enclosures i i _ �, ;-: '� (,� �, APPEDIDIX �, o _. ,® ;, ._., ,. ,,. �. ����_ �f �� �� . �. ,\1 �� ..• 1 , i i � ��,'. ., � `� �-, � 'i r. ��, ;i' 11 4 -.�"JY� 1�r� � .' �f ,_ :�-:: N i ® I 4-� e I PFZO&QLLQaAnQN �1 Fig-. : 1-1 MCINITV MAP ava .li1SJG�ISPASS072cS,'9i ,ai i o b' age ���p ♦ Ge0 iIO y, i d tsi W 241�.. 0� 8 !! FOOTHILL .a- let �� au 1 We h O- 24 da t 72 ARROW HWY tat 2J=:�fe AM w a c 471 3 F JD9 0-n, Ro o FOOTHILL 4-260 1070 t' 119 Z1 119 � T A. Ef ate: 124-.2p 3ds--s l 75 0 ft oe! J9 116 ARROW HWY 292 44 49 �� PM Figure III-7 ;PROJECT GENERATE[) PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .4GtSt 'Ol/ST.�.r^.SOtd4 t ; ALTERNATIVE 8 � x: FOOTHILL BLVD. i�fes' AV 3 4 y -W, r � �� •0� �'--diso r� `I•t S!• `, QQ�R71T • L•?�, y f � �i y� � Ls Jd'i i(• �� � ` ,74 I .{�`i (/� o`ram YrM w. x7o• ACt �' a � s',,,.•�'/�y � \ l}l�. ;/fir.• A g,ir• • M ie1unw! l� c �� 19 !/ II ��. rxa,ur,ol,. o �' oaLC-� ♦a7Aea p � ,�•'^ �'$ ? •°� !� �� i mot,?... O 2 c a! a asaC w �sAe°x A I xaa% a.it/w I /7 cYyear • Q7X@!� o7Aa:�t 0 wl JA '✓�l7�70'w! tYs , _..any._ I CITY OF Arjw, ATE _ PAP.ML MAP 93 f RAI CE0 CUCAMONGA •TER6TATl\lL MAP ENGTNEMUENG DI ION �� ►° CITY UZ,.t.ANCHO CUCAMONGt� STAFF_REPORT DATE: June 26, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning'Commission ri FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Plarner I SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT' 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY A residential subdivision of 68 single family lots on 53.05 acres of land in the Very,Low Residential District (1-2:dwelling units per acre) of the ptiwanda Specific Plan,, located on the north and -outh sides of Summit Avenue, approximately 1,300 feet xast of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 225-111--22 and 225-171-02, 08, 11, and 16. Staff recommends 'issuance of a Negative Declaration. Associated with this project is Tree Removal Permit 91-21. I. PROJECT AND SITE D.uCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the subdivision design, Conceptual Grading Plan, Conceptual Landscape Plan, and Tree Removal Permit and issuance of a -mitigated Negativ- Declaration. =- B. 'Project Density: 1.28 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use- and Zoning: North - Vacant and single family sesidertials Very Low- Residential District (1-2'dwUlling'units per acre)' South - Vacant; Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) East Vacant and single family residentiali Very Low._, Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West Vacantl Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) and County Residential 3. i D. General Plan DesignaC onsS Project Site Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - Very Low Residential and Freeway East Very Low Residential: c West - very Low Residential and Opera Space ITEM N i, PLANNING COMMISSION STAPP REPORT �r TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY June 26 1991:' Page 2 Aft G. E• Site Charact.xistics: The project site is currently vacant, with slopes ranging ,1�ipm 3 to 5 percent; sloping from the(_' north. Vegetation consists of sRveral Eucalyptus windrows and native grass and weed=_: J xL ANALYSIS: A. Generale The applicant is propesi:,g a Tentative Tract 14 p consisting of a 6a-lot subdivision with lots ranging in si;. frc 20,000 square feet. 38,200 square fe�9t with an avo .,,2 lot size of 25,068 square feet (see Exhibit "B-1). No houses are proposed with this application. The tract is bisected by the proposed extension of Summit Avenue located to the ,west of Etiwanda Avenue,(see Exhib_ "A")• Additionally; two.of the streets proposed with this tract will corinect with the ultimate development, of Tract 13812 directly;tto the east and west`- These txo' streets are Colt Drive and Vintage`Dtive. 8• Design Review C---,tteE-',- On Octo'? 7, 1990, the Committee (Chztiea, McNiel, Coleman). reviewe3 the project and recommended approval with-k"he following condit otL' 1• The block wall proposed along Vintage Drive and Summit Avenue should be designed to be,,. compatible with Tract 13812 1irectly to the west- 1"sze wall should include _ native stone pilasters with a<'ace'6cast concrete cap and a split-face block wall with a split-face cap. The mortar should match the block color and should be flush with the block face. Pilasters should be designed, 24 inches square and spaced a maximum of 40 feet on center. VAe wall should be provided on both sides of summit.:�'4`enue and both asides of Vintage Dri.ve.' 2. The freeway sound attenuation wall should he designed consistent with-the freeway wall proposed adjacent to Tract 13812. -- 3. Street trees should be provided consistent with the requirements of the Etiwanda� Specific plan. One 15-gallon size tree, shall be provided for every 15 feet of street frontage, per the Specific Plan requirement. Trees resulting from the requirements that,.,cannot be placed within the parkwap''because of spacing requirements should be planted .in. the front yard of adjacent ,lots. This requirement t addition to front yard landscaping requirements. V _�7 PLANNING COMIrSSSTON STAFF REPORT TT 14120 - E^TWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 3 1 C. Grading & Technicsl Review Cammi_ttee: reviewed by both',-' Comm and determined, ittees The project-:_wtwas . with the recommended Cond'itiots of. Approval, to be in conformance with applicable standards and'ordinanres. D. Trail Advi:son.y Committee: The project was reviewed by_tha Comt7.ttAs .and recommended for approval subject to certain modifir,ations to trail i locations Isee Exhibit -11H"). All x.ecommendations of the 'toMmittee have been incorporated into the. project by the applicant The proposed trail locations ..xe shown in Exhibit "I") E. Freeway Rignt-or'-Way: Cal-ttans is currently in the process of re-de. rmining the north property of the freeway rights-of-way which may affect the location of the south property}line of T,,,act 1;2120, ann:.consegtxently the location of the sound attenuation wall. Sugineering Conditions of Approval will hold,issuance of building permits for Lc_:�s 55-58 until the south property line can be accurktely determined. These lots will not be r.1 ced in size, they'ntay however, be - increased thzougt tho rights-cf-way determination. The Conditions of Approval will require the construction of a Sound attenuation wall' subject to a 'final acoustical analysis. Should the south priperty, line char-le, sound attenuation capabilities wall if :consistent as top of sound barrier elevations in the acoustical analysis will remain consistent. F. Tree Removal-Permit 91-21: Within project boundaries, there are eight mature Eucalyptus windrows cont::tining 496 trees consisting.of a variety of Eucalyptus `sees (Blue Gum, desert G"_ River Red Gum, and Silver Dollar Gum), A`.izona Cypress, and one California Wild' Lilac. An nxborist's report was prepargd_to address the condition of these trees, and Exr?:nit "E" identifies their location. Ore pf the windrows (Windrow "G" of the arborist'report) is located in direct conflict with right-of-way improvements for Summit Avenue. Tree Rsmoval.Permit 90-14, associated with the dCelopment of Tract 1381� to.'cne west, was approved on October 30 199D, and regulates the +,aes to, be removed and also conditions fS-=: their replacement (see Exhibit "G"), Although the arborist's report identifies that several trees in this windrow are, candidates for preservation, staff is recommending that they be removed because of necessary street alignment. Tree replacement_ on the' south side of; Summit ,hall consi,*t of Eucalyptus maculata in 15-gallon minimum sL4 planted 8 feet on center. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANy -:rune 26, 1991 Paps .4 The arborist's report evaluates the windrow condition and recommends the preservation, of 47 ,Eucalyptus trees. The report addresses only tieiz. preservation potential based on J1 their conditions not on C.e desirability of'_' preserving Eucalyptus trees ,n private ysrds. The :recommendation of preservation is made with no re4ard for lot`configuratioiz or street alignment. L_he., location"Iif moat of the 47 trees will conflict directly with ;-'ne ultimate development of the project site. Unfortunately, 0st of ;these 47 trees a.xe individnal specimens scattered throughout the site - making windrow preservaticZ infeasible. Where clusters of trees are four_d, or especially &.sfzable specimens, staff recommends preserving them.pending design review of t;;osa lots. Both the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the:ltiwanda Specific Plan allc'-T fo1, the removal of -b'ucalyptns windrows with replacement planting provided as a condition of approval. The Specific Plan establishes a windrow planting requirement of 50 lineal feet of ,new windrow plantings per project acre. Based upon, a project acreage of 53.05 acres, a .total of 2,653 lineal fees;"'of new Eucalyptus windrow will be provided with the development of ,.he, tract. The location of required on-site windrows shall be generally guided by a 330-foot by 660-foot. grid pattern. On-site windre,i plantings consist of Eucalyptus maculata in 5-gallon size planted $ feet-•on center. It is apparent that the existing windrows cannot be' preserv4�_ or effectively restored under the proposed project, wits a few exceptions. Staff recommends new windrow plantings as shown in Exhibit ''F" and selective preservation am required by the conditions in the attached Resolution. III. ENVIROPT[lENTAL ASSESSMENT_ cart 1 of the .Initial Stu3y has been completed by the applicant- Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist. Both affected school districts would be impacted by ;this project, hence a` condition requiring Participation . in a Mello-Roos funding district has been incl.ded. In addition, the project proposed the removal of, the majority of the on-site Eucalyptus windrows. The arborist',s report inu..,;ates that only 9 percent of the trees are worthy of preservat ->n. As mitigation, the project will be conditioned to replant the windrows per Etiwanda- Specific Plan requirements. Therefo;`e, although the prof 0'-, could have a significant effect in these areas, staff found than there will .not be a sia_`aificant effect in this case because of the mitigation measures which have been i'tcluded as Conditions of Approval. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. ` a PLANNING COb�N1�1SP�OI3 STAFF_MPORT TT,14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COM.ANY fr June 26, 1991 Page 5 IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The,°pro3ect is consistent with the General Plan, "Development .Code, and'''the -Etiwanda Specific PL t The project, with the° added miitigation measures, will not be detrimental to the .public health or' safety or cause nuisance or significant: environmental n pacts. In addition, the proposed site Plan, together with the recomuended Conditions of Approval, is in i compliance with the applic4ble provisions cf,the Development Code, t the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and City Standardsr ; V. CORRESPONDENCE- This item has been;,adveYtised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley''Daily'Bitlletin, the property was posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff reco=ends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration and approir,?-'of Tentative Tract 14120, and associated Tree Removal Permit; 91=21, through adoption of the- attached Resolution. Respect y sum - ted, I ; I,. Brad ler City Plannos C. i BB:TG/jfs Attachments: Exhibit'"A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "BR Tract Map Exhibit "C" ,Grading Plan Exhibit "D^;- Landscape Plan Exhibit "V - Tree Location Map Exhibit 'F" - Tree Replacement Plan Exhibit "G"'- Tree-Removal Permit No. 90-14 Exhibit "R" Trails Advisory Comment Sheet Exhibit Trails Plan Exhibit "J^.j Phasing Plan Resolution of Approval p o It VL R9-3 t t 4c •A s' Y" _ VL /]'q�e J �,I ' l �' i •':V: ` RS-3 ' / • a 1 j i� V t C T 0 i t� L 4 N N E 'D:.• C O / CITY OF 1T M:� RAlV 0Md l�UC"ONGA I'f�7 Ec •r Pi PU�NMN41 DrWISION ea it EXHIBrr. SCALE' Cs - i r >,++•naT,innve w •-__ � �_ —ate j C' � �.cn v,rrn une li r. � sl ...r y„•='r" I I trsennurn.wnannrrrvmvlm:-.-- � �. r •.•^ tIIIL..w.. rueeoarw.vrpe�s»» f Adlk rTI I r"-J .Z �..�� 1 • P _» fir.. ++e,i t . T OF RAN .—C1�fC ,* UCAMONGA rlEm PLAN TTr.E: �e� �� ► �i EXHIB SCALE: i - ,f Baal ter-� � - f '7+7 1 .. �� INDLY MAP Adak .01 .a. low �° y�— '.eeerlen•a MUM" - �M OF ��CH UCAMONGA rrEtvx: �------ PLAT NIN:-DIVISION 'Y'ITLE:� � � tiDN1; N EXHIBIT: I SCALE: ISM I An im JL �f :ems, OF R TCI UCAMCIVGA rrEM: 2 PLANMN6l*iSlON 'I'rrt.E: '►!�„ IM EXHIBIT,, (A- SCALE: 1 i f„ h , . • I. 1'� _ � ��.T�i '�� iI��i1 . I��� �tl l - N . II54 ��i M�I. �� 4� _Y � i lq . � ® Eck `� f � Y• a� T 3� �i �• ' :;a�� `:- ��'�'� a t '� '�� `�+�. �y � �� � ►�"�„ � �i ��, r,�- ,; ,' t; �... �/� '� t� ®'ate `•® °-/.� k�i �� � rr.:�{v. 1Y ��• �1: t�� �� �'4 �� 'ti � n ���=� °. `_ f> �, �.�_. �; ,, �;, �: �, �`e / 1,.�Lui�_��:'U __ s� •. � � � �_, �=• `;:� o`:` i 94 ' �p 1 � 9 �. Mi at, n T 1 .n 4 • .. ne...a.n. '. j CITY OF I�AI�TCY3t .tiUCIrIONG . PLANNII3G-tOT SION TITLE• Lft 2 �i x. _ tl� t�.*DOE �✓ice� G = �,�. c :+; Qr�`' y�='`�'L: Z'StZ"Sv j .��'r'�"k ',`a`_itl �����'�`".S�T.*t1R�.�', M N ��-.• „�-� �� H �.', mot, ��'� �'d�: �ti� , '�'� ,j•p �� ,� � � y .. 0' � . 1 t. [im � r '.t ~� �ti s c �: ♦ c sue'��. 3.x �r �f; k+i r� �� J,�» .� �:, � ., :.fit.` y� t �u t "` �. "� f' �� �;?. �. , � == k * .� �:, ,. F ;r�- 1 at ball <, -I ZZ< 10 Gel', 4 q 0 n 4w) f _ 0o qM r { �L�l R� ,; ' ' +tea ✓ a""'4 04 f J OE 39 21 rf " (41 1 E 1E -/w1,�A 74 1 sa .e a• �: i ' 1 171 /J {I x r 170 v �i IY OF f � '6 UCAMO51 .- PI.A1V ION TM. 4 , r f 1 r E r f j s Qt TK1�ra�f:'s,,�,`q�i•��yy;�k..c. A.�■,+;.ay; ZC PLAsyi�TiNr-,I7�' ISION EiEi�4441111��1*l'�A1LL.�LEGGi/ A)-17 CONSERVE TREES 11/06l9Q S, SPECIES EE NO ECIES TRUNK DIAM TAT RECOMMEND A002. EG 42 24.5 CONSERVE ; A016. EG 32`' 25.5° :CONSERVES AO17. EG 6a' 26.0 NWRRW ,cA019. EG 3" 25.0 9k ! ! �AO20. E6 38 27.0 B021. EG 12 23.5 'CON58nvE"' *B026. EG -A4 24.5 B078. EG 32 24.0 CONSERVE: C032. EG 14 28.0 CONSERVE CO3a. E6 12 24.0 CONSERVE C051. EG 11 `a0 CONSERVE C060. Ea 25 27.5 UNSERVE X C061. EG 16 27.5 irC063. EG 27 29.5 "ma D005. E6 45 25-0 CONSERVE D007, EG 13 t,7.5 CONGER"i'E D00R., EG 13 25.5 CONSERVE ' D016. EG 40 26.0 CONSERVE , D022, EG :32 26.0, zgSk"W E003. ER 10 _29.0 CONSERVE It E008. IR 12 25.5 LOW- -*-E031. ER 30 28.0 : F030. E6 29 2i•45 CONSERVE F032. EG 32 '28.5 CONSERVE F033. E6 ;52 7,9.5 'CONSERVE }E jE 6521. EG 10 22.5 -- -,_..._ : 6048. EE 47 5 23.!i 4¢ -**6057. ZC•. 10 2, 25.:. 3F -)G058. ER 64 25.0 aE*G075. ER 34 26.5 *8W06--'-wWP d,tdl ✓tr£I 'P', :-`10i. ER' '0 28.0 CONSERVE' AY (afe WIA17. !l 6102. ER 13 27.0 CONSERVE: 6104. ER 18 26.0 /CONSERVE (M4uVfr �I!�l4"AWIC[ 6106. ER �w C8 5,- GONSL I L 8107. ER 13 28. , CONSERVE *H007. EC 2J 22.J tteEWPE 41-HG13. EC 21• 25.5,� e *HO14. EC 33 26.0,, -:HOW. EC 36 2:, 1 aE H016. EC 19 25`(Ji fic8017. EC 36 25.5 *H07.8. EC 15 25.6 QBNW%IE t -Y KO19. EC 19 24.5 ?E N.020. EC 13 25.0 VMqqWs#Lpt �(c H023. EC .T•4 294 *HO28.1 EC 16 29.0 H02. Ea., 30 25.0 -rwcsk a *H0,34. EC 21 28.0 *HQ47. EC 26 26.0.. �E048. ': 17 24.5 ".jH4. 'PC 48 10.0 aeftsem � t *Hilo. EG 22 2b.5 " aQi1. E6 6 -21.Q RSW]VE (53 )TREES .v 3 sue. CONSERVE''TREES ( ! 11106/40 >. 'Y �• TREE N0 SPECIES TRUNK DIAh TOT RECOMMEND } x A003. EG 42 21.5 REMOVE AOU4. '.J')EG 7 20.0 REMOVE A005. EG 31 21.0 REMOVE N l It A006. EG x5: 0.0 REMOVE A007. EG- 16 21.5 REMOVE ,A008. EG* 25 21.0 REMOVE 'r A009. EG 20 l 21.5 REMOVE'h A010. EG 19 19.0 REMOVE_ A011. EG �S2 20.0 ;REMOVE _A012. EG 21 21.5 REMOVE c -A013. EG 000 20.5 REMOVE 36 21.5 REMOVE A015. EG 24` 22,5 REMOVE% A018. CA 0.0 REMOVE A021. AC 11 17.5 REMOV A022. EG 40. fB,.0 REM AC23.. EG 28 19.°6 REK,iVE B001. EG 23 22.0 =REMOVE" f Boo:. EG 19 23.0 REMOVE B003. EG 13 23.0 REMOVE 8004. FG 17 !.1 0.0 - REMOVE B005.0 EG' 6 0.0 +REMOVE t t B006. - EG 15 0.0 -REMOVE BOO, Er 1" 0,0 REMOVE BUu8. E'-: 000 ' 24.5 REMOVE P009. EG'; 6 18.0 REMOVE B010. EG 6 18 0 ;REMOV, :Y, BOfi,. EG 000 20.0' 'REMOVE-1',r' B012. EG ; 00c, 19.0' REMt'»c'r` 8013. EG 15 0.0 R66Vc''` 'B014. EG 000 21.5 'REMOVE BOIS. EG 000' 21.5 REMOVE `I B016. ; EG 17 12.0 REMOVE B017, EG 000 23,5 REt1Ll 1 B018. 2G 34- 19.0 REMOVE. ' 8019, EG r'a5 20.0 .REMOVE,:` B0 U. EG " 11 20.5•- REEMOV2 B022, EG 23 22.5 .REPIOVE B023. EG 7 0.0 "'REMOVE ^ 5024. EG 4.5 0.0 REMOVE I025-. EG 3 0.0 REMOVE f B027. EG 17 " 15.0 REMOVE P,28. EG 20 ' 16-B 'REMOVE B029. EG 26 14.5 REMOVE" B030. EG 24 15.5 REMOVE B031. EG 4 0,0 REMOVE B032. EG 3.5 6.0 REMOVE' 8033. EG 1b 14.0 'REMOVE B034. EG 3 0.0 REMOVE P035. EG l6 16.5 :,REMOVE S036. EGS:' c8 20.5 REMOVE B0,37. ES 000 21A REMOVE BOOB. EG 28 21.0 .REMOVE t10b� ?TREES J . 3tTC �� �lt =r CONSERVE TREES' 11l06I90 _ �� TREE NO SPECIES TRUNK DIAPI T07 RECOMMEND" B039.- ED 000 0.0 REMOVE B040. ES -000 0.0' REMOVE B04L. ED 31 22.0 REMOVE B042. E6 000 0.0 REMOVE R B043. E6 30 19.0 REMOVE t B B044. EC 40 16.0 REMOVE 045. ED 000 0.0 REMOVE 046. EB 25 16.5 REMOVE l B047. EG 10 0.0 REMOVE \l4 B048. ES 000 0.0' REMOVE ", 804'. ES 10 9.5 REMOVE k B050. ES , 000 0.0 REMOVE B051. FG 10 20.0 REMOVE B057.. ES 36 18.5 REMOVE B053. E8 000 0.0 REMOVE B054. E8 000 04 REMOVE B055. EO 000 0.0 REMOVE B056. E8 24 17.0 REMOVE , B057. E6 11 21.0 REMOVE 8058. Es 28 16.0 REMOVE B059. ES 18 16.5 REMOVE B060. ES 16 6.0 REMOVE B061. E6 33 15.5 REMOVE B062. E6 13 15.5 REMOVe B063. EG 2:?.0 REMGVL- 8064. ES 25 19.0 REMOVE B065. E8 28 0.&; REMOVE B065.1 ED 19 11.0 REMOVE '1066. E6 29 16.0 R6"7OVE B067. ES 000 17.E REMOVE B068. ED 7 14 0 REMOVE B069. ED 14.0 REMOVE B070. ED 34 21o0 REMOVE B071. Es 15 18.5 REMOVE B072. EB 38 20.0 REMOVE B073. Ef 29 17.5 REMOVE 3 B074. E8 =4 0.0 REMOVE R075. Er. 000 -Q.0 REMOVE 0076. ED 16 `40 REMOVE F 8077. CS 33 61.0 REMOVE 1 S079. EG 27 19.0 REMOVE 8080. EG 3 0.0 REMOVE 11081. E6 40 16,5 REMOVE B082. EC, 17. 16.5 REMOVE COOT. ES 21 0.0 REMOVE C002. EG 35 6.0 REMOVE C003. ED 30 22.5 REMOVE ` C004. EU 33 17.0 REMOVE C005. ES 24 20.0 REMOVE C006. EB 22 15.0 REMOVE } C007. EPa 10 15.5 REMOVE C007.1 ED 000 24.0 REMOVE C068. ED 900 0.0 REMOVE 1 U Eum CONSERVE-TREES TREE NO 5EECIES TRUNK DFAN TOT RECOMMEND C009. EG 000 ;'A.00 REMOVE C010. EG 27 19.5, REMOVE CO11. EG 13 0.0 RE'IOVE C012, EG 7 15.0 REMUVE ; C013: EG 9 0.0 REMOVE C014. EG 10 0.0 r.F,-,bVE C015. EC 13 0 0 . ,!<EMDVE C016. EG B 0.0 -'REMOVE GGiz. EG 21 14.0 REMOVE C018. EG 10 5 0.0 REMOVE '6019. E6 10 16.5 REMOVE CO20. .. :ES 29 15.0 'REMOVE 1„ CO21. =a B 3.0 REMOVE ' CO22. EG 3� 23.0 REMOVE CO23. EG< 12 ?0`:v REMOVE CO24. EG 8 0.0 REMOVE CO3-°5. EG \28 19.0;REMOtIE CO2b. EG ,13 17.5 'REMOVE CO27. 17.0 REMOVE C0:tl.i EG 000" 0.0 REMbV2 C628. cG 000 0.0 REMOVE CO^9. EG 50.0 F?IMOVE C030. EG 32' 14..0 REMOVE CO31. EG F? OJ'1 REMOVE C033. EG 9 0.0 rEMOVE C035. EG 41 20.0" REMOVE C036. EG 6 10.5, REMOVE C037 FS 9 0.0 REMOVE CO3F. EG 12 17.0 REMOVE C039. EG 13 17 0 REMOVE C040. EG 10 0.0 REMOVE C041. EG 23 15.5 REMOVE C042. AC 5.5 20.9 REMOVE C043. EG 3B 21.0 REMOVE G 044. EG 22 14'.5 REMOVE ;T C0A5, EG 9 0:0 REMOVE C046. EG 7 19.5 REMOVE C047. EG 10 20.0 REMOVE „ I C049. EG 6 O.G FZEMOVF C010. EG 16 21.5 REMOVE CW0. EG 5 0.0 _REMOVE C0s2. EG 5 0.0 REMOVE C0,53. EG 16 16.0, ;REMOVE C064. EG 3 0.0 REMOVE C055. EG 36 0.`0 REMOVE C056. EG 4 0.0 REMOVE C057 EG 36 U.0 REMOVE CJ58. EG 20 16.5 `REMOVE _.:C059. EC 12 24.0 REMOVE C062. EG a ^2.0 REMOVE C064. EG 7 0.0 REMOVE C0,65. EG 43 27.0 REMOVE D001. -tj3 OOG 0.0 REMOVE I (212 )TREES CONSERVE TREES ,.i Illabl90 TREE NO SPESIES TRUNK DIAM TOT RECOMMEND D002.' EG 12 0.0 R,-,"10VE D003. EG 50 10.0 REMOVE D00Y. EG 21 1i.5 REMGVE LO05.1 EG 3 0.0 REMOVE D006. EG 43 13-0 REMOVE D009. EG 41 21.5 REMOVE DO10. EG 36 ,17.0 REMOVE ;7011. EP 009 0.0 REN�.�E D012. EG '10 19.0 REMOVE D013. EG 28 16.5 REWVE EG 5 0,0 i7EMOVc r015. EG 000 13.0 :'REMOVE DO16. C:.G 3 23.5 REMOVE Z017. ES 37 20.0 REMOVE DO19, EG 34 10.5 REMOVE D020. Ea 34 13.5 REMOVE ; D021. EG z 27.5 REMOVE, D023. EG 12 11.0 REtiOVE 0024. EG 32 13.G:`REMOVE t D025. EG 39 13_0 REMOVE D026. tG 28 15.5 REMOVE DO27. Eta 4 19.0 .REMOVE D028. EG' Zl 0'.;7 kCMOVE D029. EC 32 , 15.5 REMOVE E001. ER 18 23.0 REMOVE E002. ER' 13 26.y 0 REMOVE E004. ER 100 29-5REMOVE E005. ER 000 19.3 REMOVE E007. ER 12 18.5 REMOVE E009. ER 000 26.5 REMOVE E010. AG 9 1.7.5 REMOVE E011. EG 000 00 REMOVE E012. EG 59 120 REMOVE E013, EG 48 20.5 REMOUVE, EO14. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE E015. ER 000 0.0 REMOVE E016. EG d3 9.5 REN,'tiVE �_. E017. EG ?00 0,0 REMOVE E018. EG 000, 7.5 REMOVE E019. EG 84 10.0 REMO!!E E020. EG `7 14.5 REM'2VE" E021, EG 13 18.0 REMOVE E022, EG 17 11.5 REMOVE E022.1 EG 6 295 REMOVE EE023. EG . 78 il.5..REMOVE , E023.1 EG 3. 13.0 REt aVE E024: EG 16 '18 0 REMOVE E025. EG 30 17.5 REMOVE, E026. EG 34 15.5 REMOVE"' E026.1 EG 2.5 22.0 REMOVE E027. ER 30 i REMMVE E028. EG 48 11.5 REMOVE E029. EG 40 REMOVE r� (265 )TREES t= CONSERVE TREES `11/0&/90 U TREE-NO SPECIES TRUNY. DIAM TOT :` RECOMMEND a E030. ER I4.5 26.5 REMOVE E032. AC 13 21. , REMOVE., EG 43; 12.5 REMOVE�, E034. EG 000 0.0 ;REMOVE E035. F,R 30 22.0~'73EMOVE 33 17.5 REMOVE ( F0U2. EG 32 14.0 REMOVE F003. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE F004. EG 24 11.0 s''_AEMOVE F005. EG 52 10.0 ,REMOVE F00i EG, 20 9.0 ;REMOVE F007, EG 12 0.0 REMOVE F008. EG 26 8.0 REMOVE_` F009. EG 48'- 11.0 REMOVE FO10. EG 32 19.5; REMOVE FO1l. EG 26 20.0 REMOVE F012. EG 20 18.0 REMOVE F01..''' EG 4 20.5 REMOVE F014. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE J=015. ES 40 ,16.0 REMOVE` F016. EG 000, 0.0 REMOVE F017. EG 40 13.5 REMOVE F016.: EG 50 18.6 ; REMOVE F019. £G 3 0.0 REMOVE F020. EG 8 " 18.0 REMOVE F021. EG 40 21.5 REMOVE.' F022. iG 000 0.0 REMOVE_' F023. : iG 63- 18 5;rj REMOVE F024y Z3 15:q REMOVE F025. CG 32 10.0:'REMOVE F026. EG 000 0.,0: RCMOVE, F027 €G 40 18.5 REMOVE> t F028. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE' F029. EG 35 17.0. REMnyr_' F029.1 EG 22 20.0` REMOVE; F031. EG 000 22.5_ :REMOVE F034. EG 22 23.5 REMOVE' F035. EG 000 24.0 REMOVE: F. G00L: : CX 000 0.0 REMOVE, 6002. EG 7 22.0 REMOVE 8003. EG dOv 25.0 REMOVE ` G004. Es 19 15.,5 REMOVE G005. EG 3 0.0 REMOVE 4 G006,. EG 27 •`.: 9.5 REMOVE GU07n EG 2 ;S 0.0 REMOVE d Bi008 ' ER, 34 17.0 REMOVE r 6009. EG 6 23.0 REMOVE (3010. EG 5 29.5 REMOVE Goii. EG 12 12.0 REmOVEI G012. EG b;:; 24.0 REMOVE` G013. EG 4. : 0.0 REMOVE C')14. EG 5, 0.0 REMOVE G015. EG 5 ++.0 REMOVE 1! -✓ ill (318 )TREES � 1J l" CONSERVE TREES 11 JO6jIi90 TREE ND SPECIES_ [IMUNY. DIAM TOT RECOMMEND son. EG 000 � 21.5 REMOVE 6017. EG, 5 21.5 REMOVE 018. EG., 20,4 '?EMOVE GOi9. EG.., 6 19.5 REMOVE G020. EG 9 20.5 REMOVE 6022. ES 000 0.0 REMOVE G023. EG 5 23.0 REMOVE � 6024. ES 5 22.0 REMOVE 5025. ER 26 10.0 REMOVE 8026. ES 1.5 0,0 „REMOVE 6027. EG 29 0.0 -REMOVE 6028. EG 0.0 RsMQVE 6029. EG 21.5 rSMOVE j 6030. EG 3.5 0.0 REMOVE 603, EG 12 0.0 REMOVE G032. EG 41 16 0 RE40VE 6033. EG 4 0.0 REMOVE } 6034. EG,` 7 0.0 REPROVE S� 6035. EG 5 0.0 REMOVE G036. Erb 28 15.5 REMOVE G037.,r ECs 3 16.,0 REMOVE ER 22 17.61 REMOV1! r G039. ES 4,3 18.5 REMOVE f C040. EG 40 21.0 REMOVE 6041. Er, 4 21.0 REMOVE 6042. EC' 5 21A REMOVE 6043 ES 10 0.0 REMOVE A 6044. EG 31 20.5 REMOVE 6045. EG, 7 22.0 ;REMOVE 6046. EG 44 12.0 REMOVE 8047. ES' 8 19.6 REMOVE 6049. Et 4 0.0 REMOVE 6050. EG 20 9."0 REMOVE G051. EG 4 0.0 REMOVE - 6052. ES ' 2 0.0 REMOVE 8053. E8 31 9.5, REMOVE G054. EG 12 0.0 REMOVE f uL s2j. EO 2 0.0,_ REMOVE f 6056. EG 5 0.0'. REMOVE G059. Ed OOJ 0.6 REMOVE 6060. EG 6,6 0.0 REMOVE 6061. EG 2 ll 0.0 REMOVE 6062. EG c3 ' 20.5 REttUVE 8063. EG '00 21.0 REMOVE 6064. EG 7 0.0 REMOVE G065. EG 9 0.0 REMOVE 6065. EG 9 21.5 BEHOVE 6067. ES 000 24,5 REMOVE G068. ER 36 22,0 `REMOS'E G069. EG 4 0.0 REMOVE 6070. EG 12 0.0 REMOVE G071. ES 4 20.0 REMOVE 6072,.. EG 19 9.51 , REMOVE(371 i l;(!t5�v7 tt r )TREES e r" 1 i:01Q.ERVE TREES ' r 1 '!06/90 TREE NO SPECIES TRUNK DIAM TOT RECOMMEND 6073. EG 14 13.0 REMOVE ).. . 6074. EG 4 0.0'.- REMOVE 6076. EG 4 0.0 REMOVE B077. ER 001) 2'.0 REMOVE 6078. EG 006 0.0 REMOVE 6079. Eft" 000 0.0 REMOVE'' G08U. tG 2.5 0.0 REMOVE ' EG 000 17,0 REMOVE 6082. EG 000 0.0 ,REMOVE G063. EG 000 O.0 RE-MOVEG084. EG 0U0 0.0 REMOVE G085. EG 000 0.0 REM`JVE 6086. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE G087. EG 5 24v60 ;REMOVE GOBB. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE G089. EG 000 10.0 REMOVE G090. ES 13 9.2 REMOVE 6091. EG 000 0,.0 REMOVE G092. EG 000 13.9 .REMOVE .3093. '�G 5 21.5 'REMOVE 6094. EG 000 0.0 Ri MOVE. 6095. EG 4 0.0 REP:OVE 6096. '-EG 000 0.0 REMOVE 6097. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE G09B. EG 000 9.5 REMOVE G099. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE G10U. EG 000 0.:i1 REMOVE lf" 6103. ER 6 23.5 REMOVE -G105. ER 8-J 22.0 WtHOVE H001. EG 11 - 15.5 REMOVE H002. EG 15 0.0 REMOVE H002.1 EG 14 0.0 REMOVE H003. EG B 0.t REMOVE H004. ER 26 25.5 REMOVE i H005. ER 3 0.0 REMOVE H006. EG 30 0.0 REMOVE HOOB. EG 54 22.0 REMOVE H009. EC 14 14.0 REMOVE HOW. EG 35 12.0 REMOVE Noll. EG qO 0.0 REMOVE H012. EC 29 29.0 'REMOVE H021. EC 44 24.5 REMOVE H022. EG 24 0.0 REMOVE H024. IX 30 0*0 REMOVE H025. EG 32 17.0 REMOVE HO?:f: EG 19 0.0 hEMOVE ;. v mi t27. EG 22 17.0 REMOVE ; H028. EG 28 17.0 REMOVE, H024.0 ER 4', _ 0 0 REMOVE H036. EG OOn 0.0 REMOVE H031. EG - 6 0.0 REMOVE H03 . 'ES 000 1 25.0 REMOVE H035. EG 33 0.0 REMOVE (424 tTREES CONSERVE TREES 11/06/90 1\ TREE NO SfiECIE5 DTAM 'TOT RECOM�4D H036. EG "`a 15.0 REriOVt -,; Eu 13 0.0 REMOVE H038. EG 30 19.0 REMOVE H039. CIS 24 0.0 "RE"I,IE . H040. ep 000 0=0 REMO4'E N041. EG 000 %G 0.0 REMOVE H042. EG 21 0.0 REMOVE._: H043. Er, 21 0.0 REMOVE H044. E:. 000 0.0 REMOVE f H045. EC . GOO 2Z'0 REMOVE i H046. EC is 5.0 t REMOVE t H049. EC 30 26.0 REMOVE HOW. EG 40 27.0 REMOVE H051. EG a 0.0 REhlnVE H052. EC 5 28.5 .RE44OVE HOW. EC 16 0.0 REMOVE ; l H054. ES 16 0.0 REMOVE H055. EG 5 3010 REMOV7 H056. EG 23 14.0 FMIOVE H0571, EG `38 0.0 KkIVE H059. En 30 0.0 REMOVE .4060. EG. 33 1910 REMOVE z*:061. u 32 13.0 REMOVE, H062. EG 30 14.0 REMOVE H063. ES 34 0.'G REMOVE' H064. EG 42 0.0 _REMOVE H065. Er 36 12`.5 REMOVE H066. EG 24 0.0 REMOVE H067. EC 30 19A REMOVE H0-48. EC 30 190 REMOVE h4a9. EC 11 19.0 REI9OVE H070. EC 16 0.0 REMOVE H071. EG 50 0.0 REMOVE \1 H072. EC 5 0.0 REMOVE H073. EG 28 22.0 .REMOViv HO74. EG 28 G.0 RFVV£ H075. EG 2A 15.0 REMOVE H076. EC 10 'J.0 N077. EG 26 0.0 REMOVE H078. EC 14' 0.0 REMOVE 14079. EC 40 22 5 REMOVE HOBO. EC 6 O.0 REMOVE H081. EC 3 00 REMOVE y H082. EC 6 0.0 REMOVE HOW. EC 6`' 6.0 REMOVE H085. EC 6 0.0. R&6j H086. EC 12 0.0 REMOVE H087. E6 0.0 REMOVE H08?. EC .4 REMOVE, HO89. EG '32 0.0 REMOVE H090. EG 22 0.0 REMOVE H091. EG 30 0.0 "OVE HOW. EG 24 14:0 itEMOt'E 11 (477 IRREES �?�rt1C�lT si iJ1� t� CONFFRVE TREES _ h106l4+0 ) TREE No. SOECIES" TRUNK DIAM TOT` RECOMMEND H093. EG 3Q 0.0 'REMOVE ;= e „ H094. EG 21 0.0 REMOVE 1 H085. EG 40 0.0 REMOVE H096. EG 19 0.0 REMOVE HOSE. ES 60 0<0` REMOVE H078c EG 4 0.0 REMOVE ' H099., EC a'6 22.0' REMOVE CJ H100•_, EG 30 27.5 REMOVE H101, ES? ''S 23.5 Rt�(OVE H102. ;G 30 12,5 REMOVe 7 H105. Eh 46 11.0 REMOVE, l H104. EG 36 0.0 REMOVE Ji H105. EG 42 14.5 REMOVE H106. EG 000 A 0.0 REMOVE ` H107. EG 38 `i 15.5 REMOVE } H108. 03 ?0 0.0 REMOVE ; Jj H104. EG 43 21.0 REMOVE 14111.. EG 000 18.0 REMOVE. H112. EG 000 22.5 REMOVE (496 TREES it r., {496 '')TREES. « :� ." ;.. -. _. ._:. ..fir- • _ ._ .. f ) y of Rancho Cucamonga, Tentatwe tract 14120, Arborist Repo,6i ae P g, KEY TO, IDA'TA CHARTS MM The first 20 page chart list!; thA-tree number, species, trunk diameter, freight 1 and croon width classes, cond ti a ratings, and initial recommendation for,'§arh tree. The condition rating system shown,in °Table C" is the one uFed ir, tbe% ,chart. ABBREVIATIONS i EG = Eucalyptus elobulus, blue -um ER = Eucalyptus rudis, desert gum EC = 5uc?,_-Ttus cawaldulensis, river red gut EP = Euca-yp'tus palyanthesas, silver dotter gun - CA = Cupressus Flabra, M ar`4zotiica?. Arizona cypress AC _ CX = Ceanothus spp., Californlar,mild lilac ti NO = Number � SP, - Species TR = Trunk, trunks= ,. DiA' Diameter DIAM = R CR = Crown -, C, = Branch, branches, branching r Tu = Twig, twiggy it LV = Leaf, leaves ID = Insects S diseases, insects & decay RT = Hoot, roots .TOT ' Total ELB = Eucaly tus Ion icorn borer P 8 A.G. = Abe.ve<ground W/ _ With HEIGHT CLASSES f,� A = to 3U ft B = 30 to 50 ft C _ 50 to 80-ft D = 80 to 106 ft E = over 100 ft MON VIDT}l CI,ASSFS to 20 ft B` 20 to 40 ft C = 40 to 6o ft D = over Ao ft l - r,t t Prepareat�by: Paul E -_ Chaney, Certified Arborist 135 �f-� ,�!• ....,.��r ...J,.��lrr I w�'s M n. i n y L• - n t .. \ r I OF T�A3 Q.!0,:,.OU(-LX'A JNGJt�. " TrrL E: PLANNING-F�FSTISION t ,. ":, 1'd' E3Cr EF": SOLE: 7 DA �"0701-02 26 91 P,C AGEN Of 10, CTTS(OF RANCHO C17CAIviOJdGA IM Civic Center Drive,Post Office Box B07 (714)989.1951 „ Rancho Cucamonga,CaLifomia 91729 Fax;.(714),987-U99 October 30, 1990 Larry Lewis Watt Inland Empire 9035 Haven Avenue, Suite 102 Rancho Cucamonga, CA.-91730_ SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 90-14 (Associated ;pith Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 90-01) Dear Mr. Lewis: The Planning pivision has approved your request for removal of Eucalyptus trees conflicting with rights-of-way improvements for Summit Avenue. Ordinance amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan allowing fore, this tree removal was approved by the City Council on September 19. 1990, and became effective on October 19, 1990. Stiff has determined that your request is in keeping with the intent of-the Etivanda Specific Plan and the Tree Preservation Ordinance-'i n that only those trees in direct conflict with Summit Avenue street improvecie4ks will be removed. Therefore, your Tree Removal Permit has been appvllfed subject to the following conditions: 1. This permit allows for the removal of 100' Eucalyptus trees whose location conflicts with rights-of way improvements for Summit Avenue. This flora is approximate and may re�Jre an adjustment, plus or minus, in the total number of trees removed. , 2. All trees proposed for removal shall be clearly may,c.ed for inspection and verification by the Planning Division prior to commencement of work. 3. Care shall be exercised by all individuals, developers and contractors working near the trees to be preserved to insure that no dainage occurs to these 'trees. - All construction shall preserve and protect the health of trees to remain,.afd new trees planted to replace those removed, in accordance with the following measures: a. No substantial disruption or removal of structural or absorptive•roots of any LiAx.,ehall be performed; And b. No fill material shall be 'placeli within 1 feet from the outer trunks or circumference of any tree; and cau7sda+r,nks M.M William J.Alexander Charles J.Buquet 11 ca Ws sg,- t3ennis L.Stout Deborah Y.Brown `����Pamela 1.Wright lack lam,AICI' 4 i C. No fifi materials shall be `placed within thhw of any tree in access of 18 inches-in depth;��nA-` lime d. No substahtfal compaction of the soil wit� ,� -a�a drip line of- my trrE ,hall be undertaken; and -- e. No construction,' including structures and walls, tic' disrupts the root system ,shall be-permitted, At guideline, to cuttingf:of roots shcuid occur with distance equal to 3 and 1/2 times the trunk diamete(-. .' measured at ground level; and h � f. Eucalyptus trees to be preserved,,shall .have adequate provisions for deep watering and limited surface watering withi:, 15 'feet of trunk. 4. Replacement planting shall occur at the dip in the Summit Avenue street alignment where the entire.wfndrow was removed" from the south side of the right-of-way. "Preliminary figures estimate this to contain 425 lineal feet of street frontage. 1 Trre replacement spacing shall be at a 8 feet on center- 5-1 Tree replaceient shall consist` of Eucalyptus maculate (Spotted Gum)_in iS gaff!on size minimum, and properly staked. _ 6. Tree replacement shall be shown on the Summit Avenue Street Improvement Plans, subject to City Planner and City Engineer rwview and approval prior to Coaeaencement of work. 7. This permit is valid for-90 days from the date of final map recordation or Building Permit issuance, whichever occurs I Extensions may be granted,upCn written request. This, decision is final unless appealed within 10 calendar days. Appeals must be filed With the Secretary of the Planning Com+mmission in writing together with a,$62.00 appeal fee, If you have any questions, please call Tom Grahn at (714) 989-1861 ,. MMUNI DEVELOP NT DEPARTMENT PL4 ING IVISY Da ol sman Principal Planner DC:TG:js Attachment: Tree Removal 'Plan ITlob /U-3/ - 1 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE __ COMMENT SHEET FEBRUARY 20,;1991 Project Description: Tentative Tract 14120 Etiwanda Heights Development CompanLr A` residential subdivision of,68 single family lots on 53 acres of land in the Etiwandi;Soecific PI I area, located .on the north;and south sides of Sumiit Ave,tue,`i,300 feet west of Etiwasda,l' rn This project was previously reviewed by'jF the Trails Committee on `r January 16, 1991, At this meeting. the Committee dial not approve the Equestrian Envelope Map as presented, The Committee advised ''the applicant to reviseathe exhibit to address the following concerns: ; 1) The potential graded pad,area for Lot 32 should not be long and narrow, but rather square in shape., in order to better accommodate a corral location in the reap yard further away from Colt Drive. Has been revised. 2) Lot 47 provides minimal area on which to site a\,\corral. Street "C" should be, pulled back,to pro-lde a,deeper'back`yard with more horsekeeping room. Street had ?at been relocated. 3) Lot 52 does not provide suffie-'..;�^oom for corral. A smaller pad should be utilized on this lot. His been revised. 4) in addition,: many of the 'restt,scted area's appear`:to'have been omitted on the plan and 'should be added ,for each lot. For, instance, Lots 51, 57., 57 and 58 have not been drawn correctly. The applicant has re•Jised the exhibit which Will be ;presented to the Committee at the meeting. Staff Planner: Tom Grahn Actions The project was approved subject to the following conditions. 1. The corrah lecetion for Lot 47 should be moved further to the south where additional space is mailable. 2. Revised equestrian' e'velope indicating all restricted areas should be resubmitted for staff''review prior to scheduling for Planning Commrission. -� I�•ltim 011 Sol �• 'fix._ �� I 1:. cow 1 In s I 1`}j'� � yer•— 1' �� it,.n.. 11�1 € —` �f 1 � i { •lor:a „ jiE1:CI Z OF + lCHO 13YV1 TITLE: I ; PLANNING- FJ�IESI�N nTT�► EXHn3rr. In SCALE: f ._riAW .r ME OF RANCHS CUCAMONGA . M. PLV i IN DWISION TrTLE: .. EXHIBTF: SCALE: RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAF:= CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14120 AND RELATED 'TREE-REHOVAL PERMIT 91-21,-A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 68 SINGL-_--�.(MILY LOTS ON 53.05 _r tv ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH' SIDES` OF SUMMIT AVENUE, 1,300 FEET WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE IN THE VERY LOW, RESIDENTIAL DISTRIJT (1-2 DWT-LLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING' FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERSOF - APN: 225-111-22 AND 225-171-02, 08, 11, AND 16., A. Recitals. (I) Etiwanda Heights Devd'lopment Compnny Has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14126 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day of June 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing ,on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (III) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of-this Resolution` have occurred. B. Resolution, 1 NOW, THEREFORE, �;t is hereby found, determined; and, resolved by the Planning Commission of the�?City of Rancho_Cucamonga. as follows: 1. This dommiasion-hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission ". during the above-referenced public hearing on June 26, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this o s y, Commission hereby specifically _ p _y £rode as follows.: (a) The application applies to property located on the north and south sides of Sumittit Avenue, 1,300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, with a,';`" street frontage of 950 feet. and a lot depth of 610 feet on the north side of ' Summit Avenue and a street frontage of 659 feet and a lot depth of 2,638 feet yJ -n the south side of Summit Avenue. (b) The property to the north is vacant, the property to the south is the freeway right-of-way, the property to the east contains single family homes and vacant property, and the proPerty to the wesi­is-vacant (Tract 13812 is located directly to the west' and has been graded but construction of units has not yet begun). PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY \. June 26, 1991 Page. 2 a (c) The proposal to develop 68 single family, lots on 53:A5 acres of '_and is consistent with the Very Low Residential land use designation of.the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findis}gs of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (u) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,,•9nd specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with thq General Plan, Development Code, and,specific plans; and �. (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the sutdivi',loon is,' not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife Or their habitat; and (o) The tentative tract is not likely to cause' serious public health problems; and •I (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with: j any easement acquired by the public at large, now of_record, for access through or use of the property withir-the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby .finds and certifies that the proje t has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigatedNegative Declaration. , 5. Based upon the,.andings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and` in the attached` Standard Conditions, attached hereto andincorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) The block wall proposed alonq Vintage Drive and Summit Avenue shall be .designed to be compatible with Tract 13812 directly to the west. The wall shall include native stone pilasters- with a pre-cast concrete cap,and a split-face block wall with a'split-face block cap. The mortar color I shall match`the `black color and; shall be flush with the block face. Pilasters shall be designed 24 inches square { 1 AJ,3 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIOHTS COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 3 and shall be spaced a maximum of 40 feet on center. The wal'1, ahall be provided' on both sides of Summit, Avenue and both sides; of vintage Drive. The design of the wall shalt be shown on the Landscape and Irrigation'Plan snd shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to isananre of building permits. , 2) Material eamples for the block wall shall be submitted for City Manner review and ,approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) 111 sound atter-latE�a waA, as required by the acoustical analysis sY,all be>inatalled along " the mouth tract boundary and :shall be:designed consistent with the sound attenuation. wall to be provided with Tract 13812. `The final design and location of the wall shall' be subject to Design 'Review Committee review ,and approval prior to the,aivance of building permits. 4) A final acoustical analysis shall be required to identify necessary mitigation measures to reduce noise levels within the residences belt a 45 CNEL. The zflport shall be subject to City Planner rsview ''and approval prior to the 'issuance of.-building permits. 5) Tree Removal Permit No. , 91-21 is hereby approved for the ral,aval of all trees, including stumps, on ,th project site except for those-trees described below:' ; Tree 0in 4 Tract Arborist Reoort,q� Lot _ AZ ,. 54 i A16 52 B21 49 H78 61 C32, C34, C60 43 C51 < 63 D5 r f 39 D7, D8 38 D18 36 E3 68 F30 23 F32 24 P33 25 G101 21 0102, G104, G106 27 G107 29 N- 37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION SRO:, TT 14120 - ETIWANDA ,HEIGHTS COMPMY June 26,, 1991 Page 4 6) Tree Removal Permit No. 91-21 eha12.be valid for a period of 90 days, subject to extension by the City Planner. The 90 days shall start from the date of issuance of rough grading permits. a 7) New an-site windrow planting vhall lie provided at a rate of 50 lineal feet per acre. Based.on a project of 53.05 acres, 'a minimum of 2,653 lineal feet of on"site Eucalyptus windrow shall be provided. The location of required on-site windrows 'shall be in accordance with Exhibit "F" of the Jung 26,; 1991 Planning Commission Staff Report. On-site windrow plantings shall consist. of Eucalyptus-maculata ;s in.,.S-gaUan size planted 8 'feet on center. On-site windrows shall be shown on , the Landscape. and Irrigation Plan and shai pe subject to City Planner review and app,} al prior to "`building permit issuance: vow planting shall be C—Apleted prior to occupancy."" 8) Care shall be exercised -h_ all individuals, developers, and contractore working near . .' preserved trees so that no damage occurs to " such trees. In (,Aacccrdance with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section i808, all construction shall preserve and proxect the .>` health of trees to remain, and new trees planted to replace those,removed . 9) Prior to accepting deposit on 0- property, the developer shall requ:lre each prospective buyer to sign a written notice of-any existing windrows or trees required by,.these.conditions to be preserved li+ place. ``Said disclosure shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation 10) L construction, including -ltilitieey that disrupts the root' system shall be penaitted. As a guideline, ,no trenching, or other construction activity should occur within 15 feet of the tree trunk. 11) The applicant shall follow all of the ei arboriet's' recommendations regarding preservation, including but not limited to li monthly watering. it 39' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. , TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS CCMPANY June 26, 1S91 Page 5 a 12) Th`:/two north/south Local FeE41f trails south 1 , of Summit Av6tiue shall be connected to the Community Trail along Summit.Aveiiue per City Standard Drawing No. 1007. 13) Trail fencing shall not be installed at the outside portion of trails abutting existing or proposed 'trails in order to prevent "split trails," ' such as along the westerly 'tract boundary. 14) Local Feeder trails shall be left open at connections with streets and constructed with drive approaches for equestrian service access. 15) Houses shall be setback a minimum distance of 10 feet from trails occurring at side yards. 16) All Community and Local Feeder trails°`®hall be constructed concurrently with th9,- �trec improvements. 17) Heavy broom, finisb concrete crossings, shall'se provided where trails -cross,public streets. Aft The crossings shall be shown on the street improvement plans and shall be approved by the City Engineer and City Planner prior to „ approval of the Final Map. Engineering_Division 1), The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) ' on the Project side of Highland Avenue :shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site east of the east project boundary to the first pole off-site west of the west: project boundary. The developer' :may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half of the City adopted .cost for undergrounding from future redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite side of Highland Avenue. 2) Summit Avenue shall be constructed full width, Including street lights but excluding off-site parkway improvements, from the intersection with Bluegrass (Hanley) Avenue easterly to the intersection with<Etiwanda Avenue with Phase I development.- The developer of Tract 13812 is preparing to construct these street ' ` l-3'7 - i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO'`, h TT 14120 -^ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY Irk June 26, 1991 Page 6 improvements subject to a reimbursement agreement_ to be established upon completion of the improvements: Therefore, the following shall apply: a) A written release shall be obtained from Watt Inland Empire indicating ti-at all developer-to-developer reimbursement obligations have been met prior to Final Map „approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first; and b) The 'developer shall duplicate the bonding for Summit Avenue, with the addition of parkway, improvements across the; project frontage; and C) Summit.Avenue shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer:prior to the -release of any project occupancies; and " d) If this dav-aAoper completes the improvements of"Summit Avenue, he may request a reimbursement agreement from adjacent development,. 3) Construct sufficient portions o£ ,.approved street syatem u1thin Tract 13Sl2`to-=5rov!:!e;two means of access to gall portions of the tentative tract, including but not limited to, Colt Drive, Golden Trails Avenue, Vintage Show Horse Way, Rodeo Drive,, and 'the temporary access across the Route 3O Freeway right-of-way. Streets shall be constructed full width,'including street lights. Off-site i parkway improvements may be deferred 'until development of the adjacent, property. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement frczk future development for all off-site improvements. 4) Bluegrass (Hanley) avenu€> and `"F" Strr:e_t shall ' be constructed ,full width, including street lights. Bluegrass shall be constructed to collector street standards (44 fleet wide). Off-.site parkway improvements, map,`t be deferred until development (r.a®celopment� of the r adjacent properties. The developer may request reimbursement agreements, from future development, for improvements on the off-site o side of the respective centerlines. q j Iti ° PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIOL7 NO. lt1i TT 14120. - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPAW-1- " June 26,E 1991 Page 7 } ✓ �l Afth 5) An: easement for Bluegrass Avenue over the Hetropol';tan Water District (MWD) fee property shall ? t obtained prior to Final Map approval or ig,uance of building emits, whichever occure' first. The MWD fee roperty shall be identified to their satisfaction on she Final Map and the improvement plans shall conform to MWD guidelines. 6) Construct portions of the Etlwanda Master Plan System 5 I Storm Drains located iSiuit and Etiwanda Avenues and install concrete lining in the existing dirt channel north of Highland Avenue, as justifled by the final drainage study and approved by the City Engineer. ` Applicable standard drainage fees for portions Of the'-'site within Area'S shall be credited to the cost of the'(acility and the developer shall be eligible for`reimburm"ent of costs in excess of the fees in accordance with C policy. ity P y. y 7) Provide sufficient cat oh,basins: at the,;aump in Summit Avenue, near- the : ^F" 'Street intersection, to minimize the possibilit of overflows dne to catch basin blockage" or relocate the sump, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. `r 8) All local trail crossings of collector:streats shall occur at intersections, as follows. a) On Summit Avenue, trail crossings shall occur at the intersections on the south side only, aligned with breaks in the ' Community Vrail; and b), nn Vintage Drive, the only crossing shall occur at the intersection with "B" Street. 9) Provide special coverings (bolted on neoprene, plywood, etc.) for all storm drain manholes located in local trails,:. as approved by.the City Engineer and Trails Committee. � 10) A certificate shall be placed on the Final Ma;?- indicating that Lots 5, 6, 15, and 16 shall remain undeveloped until such time as (Ithe desilting facilities for Streets "G" and ,;H^ are no longer required, to the satisfaction of the City innineer. l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY-� j June 26, 1991 i Page 8 11) The dimensions of Lot "A" shall be approved by Caltrans prior to Final Map Approval. If Lot is reduced in width, hots 55 through SB sh:'ll be lengthened by the same amount. 12) Building peranits for-Lots 55-58 shall be , withheld until such the as a „ final v determination is made b Caltrans l for.the north property line of the freeway right-of-way. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. J ;-"PROVED AM ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF-JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA li BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST. Brad Buller, Secretary 1, Bran Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly -aid regulluXly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular masting of the Planning Commission bald on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMJISSIONERS; r NOES: COMMISSIOMRS: I ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r,- - 2- s DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STA N 8'A 0% m Am"'"' am 0 Ap�% L) K U UV N L;IT10"'ANS PROJECT#: 14.�tktDr�tVG �—- (1 1'TI SUBJECT: APPLICANT: ter'? fI LOCATION: 0 fM lWk (�0 Those items checkod are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIR ISIaN, (714)OW1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits t. Approval shall expire,unless extended by the Planning Commission.If building parents are —��-- riot issuedorapproveduse has not commencedw3thin 24 monthsfromthe date ofapproval. 2. Development/DestriReview shall be approved prior to I r ,.. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. _ Is granted subject to the approval of _--J— --z��4.The developershaltoommenoe,paRip,3;,ein,aNconsumnsteorcausetobecommrmed, --J-.,_/.,_ participated in,or consummated,a Mailo-Roos Community Facilities District(CFD)for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance constnxxion and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shalt be located,designed,and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and shalt become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs.1n any but*ft of a station,the developer shall camplywith all applicable laws and regulations.The CFO shall be formed by the;lftka and the developer by the firm recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the Issuance of building permits,whichever comes first,the applicant shall consent to, or participate In,the establishment of a Mello-Roos Communh Facilities P,%I ict for the construction arrd maintenance of necessary school facilities. However,if any school district has previously established such a Community facilities District,the applicant shall,in the alternative,consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map, or the issuance of building peanits,whichever comes first.Further,ti the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Rocs Community FacTi dies District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project,this condition shall be deemsd null and void. SC-2/91 l of l� A)--YJ Ko LILT SgllCletiak Deis This condition shall be waived the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and ail school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordation a`the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is ___/_/_ involved,written certification from the affected water dlstrLt that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall`-e submitted to the Departmer.A or community Development.Such letter must have bevn`Issued by the water district within,90 days priorto final map approval in the case of vjbdivision orpriorto issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B.Site Development I 1. The site shall be devebped and maintained in accordance wilh the approved plans Witch ___--J include site plans, are0ecturai elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign Program,and priding on file In the P nnirg L�iti�tsion,thgl conditions contained herein, Development CWe regula'ons,and i1Wi�Vt r —.--Specific Plan �aaso �sm�a�. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenc*d thereon, all _/_/ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the QQ. Planner. I 3. Occupancyof the facility shall notcommen,ra untlisuchtime asall Uniform Building Code and _/__/__ State Fire Marshall's regulations have been compiled with. Priorfo occupancy,plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to snow compliance. The buiidl.,V shall be Irapected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations Incotporsting ail Conditions of Approvai",.-11 be J_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits, f e S.All site,grading.landscape,inigation,and street improvement plans shall be Coordinated for —/--J consistencypdortoIssuanceofanyper:rifts(such as grading,tree rLnoval,encroachment, building,etc.),or prior to final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whichever domes first. e 6. Approval of this request shall not waive COmpUnce with all sections of the Development Code,all other applicable Chy Ordinances,and applicabIle Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at thetirne of Building Pemrit Issuance. 7. A detailed on-site fighting plan shall be reviewed and appr[, ed by the City Planner and ___--J— Shariff's Depai meat(989-6611)prior to the issuance of butddlrtg permits. Such plan shall indicate style,illumination,location,height,and method of shielding so;®s not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are prt.Tided,a trash pick-up shall be for Individual units __j f with all receptacles shielded from public view: 9. Trash recepfarle(s)are required and shall meet Citystandards. The final design,locations, ___lam. and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review are,a^^c;val prior to issuance of building permits. 10.all ground-mourned utility appurtenances such as transfonners,.AC cenLensers,n2c.,shall. ,/`/ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use rf a combination ct concrete or masonry walls, terming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. SC-2/91 2 of 12 /✓ < .le Emi.I :'�"f i�i2b ' S�mdeua,Date: 11.Street names shall be submitted for Cty Planner review and approval in accordance with I JJ the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a 69ar and concise manner, r� including proper illumination. 13.A detailed plan indk.:ling trail widths,maximum slopes,physical conditions,fencing,and h weed control,in accordance with City Master Trail drawings,shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordationof the FinalTraet Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans.Deveiopershail upgrade and construct all trails,Including fencing and drainage devices,in conjunction with street Improvements. 14.The Covenants.Conditions and Restrictions(CC&Rs)shall not prohibit the keeping ofequine animals whsre zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met.individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the i.•ew;uhy of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners'associations for amendments L1 the CC&Rs. I 15.The Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions(CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Jam_ Homeowners'Associatbn are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney.They shall be recorded concur entiy with the Final M:p or' . prior to the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16.All parkways,open areas,and landscaping shall be permanently maintained bythep►operty J_L— owner, homeowners'association,or othor means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17 Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of araurring that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across 2djs:- 'hte or units for use of a solar energy system.The easements may be contained In a f' `an at Restrictions fcr the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the rak 4 the fins:map or issuance of,permits,whichever corrbas first.'The aasem6rds sha,:, •".,it the Ming of shadows by vegetation,stnrotures,fbdures or any other object,exi:6014r utility wires and similar objects,pursuant to Development Code Section 17.00.060d3.2, 18.The project contains a designated Historical LandrnadL Tho site shag be developed and J_!_. maintained in accordant,,with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. Any further modilizationstothe site including,butrotlfmkedto extedorOrfraWraand/or interioralterationswhfchatTeitttheexterT- oftttebuiidfrgserstractures,rerriavaloflandmark trees,demolition,relocation,reconstUtion of buildings or structures,orahanges to the site, shall r9quire a modification to the Historic Lardmmik Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An anemath•e energy sysiem is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units _'__/_ and for heatiry a w issrrimming pool or spa,unless other alternative energy systems are demonstra",,d to beer equivalentcapacity and efficiency,.All swimming pools irwialled at the time of initial evelopr int shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be inclirded in the Vuiid. —and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval plor+a the cc�r�_=: _19 permits. 2. An dwellings shrill have itie faint, side and rear elevations upgW t with architectural treatment.d^tailing an4':creased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to Issuance of building permits.,. p�isryo. r�B Yla.Q., .. C=docai Date: 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners,Associatwn shall bQ submittad for r-J City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances,Including alrconditioners and other roof mounted.Ouiament and/or projections,shall be shielded fromviewand the sound buffered rorsadjacentpropsniesand streets as required by the Planning Division.Such screening shalt be architectl:rally Integrated-fth the building design and construated to the satl faction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in blildin4 plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Accew(Indicate details an building rxr ':g _1. All parking lotlandsrape Islarxfs shall have a minfRU�."Iside dimension of 6 feet and shall Jam/ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking d,,711(Including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavernei t acroz3`circulation aisles shall be provided,hroughoutthe developnientto connecidwellings/unetsUikiingswithopen 0,.)aces/ plazas/recreational use s. 3. All parking spaces shaii be double stripad per City standards ar4 all drly ay entrances,and exits shall tx s+^ted per City standards. 4. All units shalt be provided v ergs;, door openers"rf drnrewrays are iess than IS feet in, _/-J— depth from back of sidewialy 5. The Covenants,Conde'`" s®nti —4.1rictions shall resfdcathe storage W.recreation!vehicles —J--� on this site unless they-:.ids the principal source of transportation forthe owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than In designated visbrpafti;areas. 6. Plans for any security fiai;as shag 4e submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer,and —1_J Rancho Cycamonga Fite ierotection District reviewaredapprovalpriortelssuance of building permits. S. Landscaping(for publicly Ra108.ined la areess,wafer t®SMiorr N.) 1. A detalkrd landscape and rrigatk n plan,indk9 t slope planting ano model hems landscap- ing in the case of residential dA'-d em, Mail be prepared by a licensed landscape architectandsubmiftediorCkyc annnerreviswfiWapprovatpriortoihessuanceofbON ing permits or prior final reap approval in the case of a custom lot Subdiviaion. f 2. Existing trees required tobeWeSOMWInplawshahbe Protected with a construction barrier —Jam.._./ inaoaordancs+ ththeM"rdcapafCOdeSection19.08.110,and3onotedonth, gradingplans. The locatkin of those trees to be preserved in pace arld now Locations fc rWin;planted trees shall be shownen the detailed lana%capaplans.The appikM Shallfollm mall of the arberist s recorrimndrAlons regarding preservation,transp aniinng and trimmir:p mettrods. Amfnimumcf treespergrossacre-COmPrisedctthefotfoWeingsIzes,shaUlosprovided _JrJ within the prowl: %-48-inch box orlargsr._%-3ra-inch box or large., % 24-inch box or larger, 15-gallon,and Yo-5 galkin. 4. A minirrnlrrn of %Of trees planted within the project shall be 24-Inch box or larger. specimen size trees- J_J 5. Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate Of ar1415-gallon tree for every three � J ), Parking stalls,sWIcient to shade Stile of the parking area at solar croon on Augum?1. SIC 2/91 4or12 7 jl 5. Trees shall be planted In areas of public viewadjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 7. All private siopebanks5feeior less in vertical height and of5:1 orgrearersicpe,but less than 2:1 dope,shgl,be,at minimum,hingated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall Include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prtortoo:cupancy, S. Allprivate slopes inexcessof Steel,but lessthanBfeet in vertical height and ol2:1orgreater JJ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion cordro.and to soften theirapppearance as follcvlS:one 13-gallon or ia�Pr size tree per eat h 150 sq.ft.of slope area,1-gallon or larger �Izeshiub per each 100 sq.it of slope area,and appropriate ground cover.in adrWon,slope ,+arks in oxcess of a feel in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 3 V lon or larger size tree per each 2.so sq.ft.of slope area.Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane.SMtsa planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrig fition system to be installed by the developer prlorto i occupancy. 9. For single family residential deveopment,all slope planting and iniWkr-shalt be corillnu- r/J_ ouslymaintainedina healthy and thrivingcondWnby the developec;,talie ohindia3d.r31tmft is sold arKlocx<upiedby the buyer.Prksrtoreleauingoccupangy;vrthos3ratido,aninspAetion shall be conducled by tha Planning.Division to determir a that they are irrsatisfactbry condition. 10.For mufti-family residential and non-reslr.a,:;af development,properly ovrMrs are respon- _j—P._ sable for the continual maintenance of W"3caped areas'on-site,as well as contiguous planted areas within tho public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintainsd in a healthy and thriving condition. and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any ds+riaged, dead, diseased,or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11.F nt ya lards^ ing shall required per tt,e Dsvebprtmarl Code and/or _ _i 4 _.This requirement shag t o In aaklitiuun to the t trees and s planting. rogUiiyd 12.The final design of the ig perimeter parkways,mails, lanKiscaping,3rxt sidetyaiks shall be included In the required landscape plans and shall 0 sU*Ct to City Planter review and approval and coordinated forconsistsncy WManyParkway laidxaptrt¢plan which may be required by the Engineering Division, 13.Special landscape features eikch as nvuriding.a;uvial MCK epecUrlen size trees,meander- Vie/ ing sidewalks(with hr.,rizoMai cfaango),and Intensified landscaping,is required along 14.Lands caping and Irrigation systems required tot*installed within the Pubiic right-of-way on Jam_ ttie perimeter of this project area shall tjo amntlwously maintained by the developer. 15.All'walls shall be Pro0ded w4h decorative treatirnent.H located In Public maintenance areas, _j_ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering DivzWn. 16.Tree maintenance criteria shall be de%*bW and submitted for City Planner review and —/_/ approval prior to Issuance of building permits. Thor criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected Use species. 17.Landscaping-and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water thrpltgh the prirrIpies o4 Xeriseape as defined in Chapter 19.1 s of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SC.2/9 f 5of12 N> q7 .: 11710) F.signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a art of this Any signs proposed for this development shall co p approval -I___/_ require separate P comply with the Sign Ordinance and.shall ir �'ication'and approval bythe PlanningDivision priorto installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Propram forthis development shall be submitted for CitV Planner review arW LJ_ approval prior to issuance of bulldir4j permits. 3. Diractory monument sign(s)shall be provided for apartment,condominium,ortownhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. �.E"`.'fvnmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock _j__ /,_ Crusher project in standard format as 63terrnned by the City Planner,prioi to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted —J---J_ Special Studies Zone for the Red Hiu Fault, Ina standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a deposit on any property. 3. Tkhe developer shall provide each prospective buyer written rxatice of tr`:n Foothill Freeway prpject in a standard format as determined by the City Partner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any Property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and Aft Issuance of building approval interior riortoie _ /_/ penults. The final report snail disaxass the level of rrtelor noise attenuation tob3low45CNEL,the building materials and constructiontechniquesprovidsd and If appropriate,verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures.The builoingplans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report, H.Other Agencies 1. Emergency secondaryaccessshallbeprovtdedinpocordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire —1—/. Protection District Standards. 2. Emergency access shall be provided,malmenance free W clear,armnlnwm" of26feetwide' -��— at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to issuance of building pammts for combustibla corstnuAion, evidence shall be J.J submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire PnHectbn District tttat temporary water supply for dire protection is available,pending oomplsfion of required fire protection system. Iff 4. The applicaid shah,contact the U.S.postal Service to determine the appropriate type and _!--!— location cr?mail boxes.Mufti family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure fr,r mail boxes with adequate lighting.The Mal bcatlon of the fstali boxes and the design of V overhead structure shall be subjwtto City planner:eview and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. - 5. For pmjeci s using septic tank facilities,written certification of acceptability,including all supportive-dormation,shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Emrironme,:ial Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permit.;',and prior to issuance of Wilding pemtits. SC-2/91 Sorb /V � %rj APPLICANTS SHALL. CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714)989-11iF3,'FOt� COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ! 1.Site Development 1.The applicant shall com:plywdth the iatestadopted Uniform Building Code,t iformMechani- Cal Code,Uniform Plumbing Code,National Electric Code,and all other.applicable codes, ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits, Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for anew residential dwelling;unft(s)or major addition to existing unit(s),the app4lcant shall pay deveklpmentfees at the established rate Suchfees may include,but are not limitedto:City Beautification Fees Park Fee,Drainage Fea,Systems Development Fee,Permit and Plan Checking Fees,and School Fees. i 3. Prior to issuance of buikting permits for a new ccmmeroial or industrial development or addition to an existing dr vaiopment,the applicant si~all pay development fees at the established rate.Such fee s may include,but are mot limited to:Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee,:School Fees,Permit and Plan Checking Fees 4. Streat addresses shall beprovldedby the BuildingOifieW,aftertracVp=elmapremrdation _/_/ and prior to issuance of building permlLs. J.Existing Structum, 1. Pmvde compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the pmprty line clearances rJ Consddoring use,area,and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be m ade to comply with correct building and zoning the Intended use or the building shall be demolished. regulations for /_J� 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be romoved,filled ar0orcapped to comply with the __/.—/_ Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Build'p1g Code. 4. Underground on-shg utilities are to be located and Shown on builfing,plans submitted for _I._/_ builJing;permit application. lei K.Granting 1. grad: U the subject Grading b)e property Shall be in r&=rdance bvith the Uniform Building Code,City ---�—�-- Grading Standards,and accepted gvadkg practices.The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved gWIng plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Calitomia to —J--/ perform such work. 3. The development is located within the!toil erosion control boundaries;a Soil Disturbance —J_(— Perms:is required.Please contact San B+pmardh0C0urty Depatlmentof Agriculture at(714) 387-2111 forpemrit application.Documirftallonof such permit shalt be submitted tothe City r prior to the Issuance of rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shall be;mpared by a qualified engineeror geologist and submitted at —%�— the time., application for grading plan check. S. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved priorto Issuance of building permits. _l_J sC-2/91 7 0f 12 Al,�1 •• 7T l�lZo S. As a oust xn-iot subdivision,the following requirements shall be met: a.Sti posted and an agreerneW executs guaranteeing completion of all on-site ! —�dra r•cilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the 1uildi t ana ,.otyUivisionpriorto final map approval arid priorto the issuanceotgra the arming b.Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage Grater that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels,are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits, c.On-site drainage improvements,necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided —J_J properties,are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving,or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to he Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. This matt be on incremental ( an or composite basis.) e.All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be sboded with native grasses orplarr<'3d with ground coverfor erosion cor=l LWn Completion of grading orsome other altemaj,�ve Method of erosion conijbi shall beccmplstedto the satisfactionofthe Building Official.In addition a permanent-irrigation system shalt be provided. This requirement does not release the appficant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.0401 of the Dsvelopment Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (7+4)989-1862 FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE F:)LLOVknNG CONDITIONS: L Dedleatlon and Vehicular Access 1-Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior Public streets, J_.J_community tails,public pasecs.public lardscOpe areas,street trees,and public drainage facilities as shown on the;plans and/or tentMiv@ map. Private easements for non-public facilities(eross•lot drainage,local feeder trails,etc.)Shall b®resefvsd as shown on the plans andlor tentative mi m. 2. Dedication shall INi maos of the following (r*asured from street centerline): rdgPrts•of•wh the �lrirtleterstr®sts _JJ� 30 tot>al Beet AnC �,e; Sec .33 total feet an 3S total feat onttb�$ total feet on 3. An irrevoccars offer of dedication for_-foot wilt roadway easement shall be made _J ' for all I private streets or drives. a. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to tha City'lor the following streets: ' Ve •j -- 6 5. Rrciprocal access easements shall be providdd ersuring mess to all parcel- by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be 1300rded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits,where no map is involved. ' 3193 6'U _6, Private drainage easements torcross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineatea or noted on the final flap. -- 7. The final map,,�all clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring iiining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: TWe hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of(residential)buildings(or other structures)within those areas designated :; on the map as building restriction areas.' A-maintenance agreement shalt also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. All exieting easements lying within future rights-of-way shalt be quitclaimed or delineated on J�J� the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks arxi/oirstreet trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10.Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes,to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs.if curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane,a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. i� 11.The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-sille property'nterests J—J_ necessary to construct the required public improvements,and if he/she should tall.0 do so, the developer shall,at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval,eniar into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required tortheimprovements, Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred,by the City to acquire the off-site property interests regtAired in connectionwith the subdivision.Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an �ttt appraisal report obtained by the develo w,at developer's cost.The appraiser shall have I been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal M.Street Improvements _V111001 1. All puVe,Tiprovements(interior st(eets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos. _/�' landscal ed areas,etc.)shown rn the plans and/or tentative map shall be constru.aed to ' City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include,but are not fimited to,curb and gutter,AC pavement,drive approaches,sidewaks,street lights,and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26-loot wide pavement,within a 40-foot wade dedicated right-cf way shall be ,_/__j_ constructed for all haft-section streets. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including,but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB& A.C. SIDE DRIVE S REEr STREET COMM. MED OTHER I yy CUTTER PVM/i WiW A AFM LIGHTS TREES TRAIL ISLAND OC41A�iMT t� V V °67 L s SC•2/91 9o(12 ���' � Notes: (a)Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b)Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c)It so<marked.ssde- walk shall be curvilinear per STD.304, (d)'It so marked,an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Rem. AMk 4. Improvement plans and construction: I a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights,prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer,shall be submitted to and approved by the CRy Engineer.Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the,satisfaction at the C4 Engineer and . the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public andlor private street improve- ments,priorto final map approval or the issuance of building permits,whicheveroccurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way,fees shall be paid arw-"s" construction'permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers office in addhian to any other perrfit5i;required. C. Pavement strii iing,marking,traffic.street name signing,and interconnect conduit shall be installr<d to the atisfaction of t'he City Sogineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shell]be installed on any new construction atreconstructicn of major,secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major,secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals.Pull boxes shall be placed on troth sides of the street at 3feetoutsideof SCA.ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1)All pull boxes shall be No.6 unless otherwise specified by the,!fir/`'Etx�ineer. _/_l (2)Conduit shall be 3-inch gaNanized steel with puilrope , e.. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four ootners of intersections per City --�---�— Standards or U directed by the City Engineer f- Existing City roads retruiiril corr3tnlCtion sftall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours duringtonstnfction.A street closure permitmaybe required:Acash deposit shall be provided to Cover the cost of grading and paving, which shalt be refunded upon comp&etion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated dfainage flows shall not cross sidewalks.Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards,except for single family jots. n. Handicap aca`ss ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. !_I. Street names j.ihafl be approved bythe City Plannerpriorto submiltalfor first plan check. J_y S.Street improvement plans per City Standards for all prorate streets shall be provided for _J _ review and approval by IN City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction permts shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. 6.Street trees,a minifre)m of 115-gallon size or larger,shag be installed per City Standards in !_/ accordance with the City's street tree program. i 0 SC-2/91 to or 12 �5 z iyI; 7.intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance w,tn adoped policy. a. On collector or larger streets,lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, —�—`— including drNeways.Walls,signs.and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of fight shall be approvod by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their notloeability improved,usually by movingthe2+/•close tstrsettreesoneachsideawayfromthestreetandplacedinastreet tree easement. 8.A ermit shall be obtained from COAL TRANS for any workw1hin the-following right-of-way: : AN 9.All public improvements on the following streets shall be operatbnally complete prior to the —issuance of building permits: tt.Public Rkalntenahce Amos V 1.A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineediip adblic Works Standards —J—J— shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and apprpval,p(ior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.The following landscape parkways, trails,or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: Vt6Y4a4&SUL4 Sut►aufl!<J G,.J1 $1taE S s Aft 2.A signed consent and waiver form to join andforfonn the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _.J_I qNF Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer priorto final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first.Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continue,isly maintained e-',lhe __/'_ developer until accepted by the City. 4.Parkway landscaping on the following streat(s)shall conform to the results of the respective J_/ Beaut fication Master Plan: 0.Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project(or portions thereof)is located within a Flood Hazard Zone;therefore,flood J i— protection measures shall be provided as candied by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer, 2.It shall be the developers responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone 1_ designation renoved from the project area. The deve!opers engineer shall prepare all necessary reports,plans,and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Condttlonal Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR)shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final trap approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A Letter of Map Revision(LOMR)shall i be issued by FFMA prior to or;cupancy or improvement acceptance,whichever occurs first. ' 3.A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. SIC•519t it oria A] 3 7roy�_zo` 4.A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within r s right-of-way.S.Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of an J—— measured from the outer edge of a nature tree trunk. y Public storm drain pipe 6.Public storm-train easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a _J _/— blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P.Utilities 1-.Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanitary sewerage system,water, -_/_!s gas,electric power,telephone,and cable TV(all underground)in a*r ,,,dance with the Utility Standards.Easements shalt be provided as required, 2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilitiel as necessary. _/_J 3.Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the -J_ 1__ Cucamonga County Water District(CCWD),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino,A letter of compliance from the CC WD is required prior to final map apprnyai or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first = Q.General Requirements and Approvals t.The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into �--� one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2.An easement for a pint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance_of building,Permits.whichever occurs first,for _3.Prior to approval of the final.map a deposit snail be posted with the City covering the JJ estimated cost of apportioning the assess=nts,under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. a. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Re ,ante,Secondary Regional.and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall bepa�►drtot(nan ; �provalorpB,or.tobuildingNrmhissuance it map is involved. � n 0; SK + 5.Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: _.!—/ 6.A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community J I facilities District shall be Tried with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building pemtits,whichever occurs first.Formation costs shall be home by the Developer. _ 7. Prior to finalization of any development phase,sufficient improvement plans shall ba com- _.1____!_, pleted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.Phase boundaries shall correspond to W lines shown on the approved tentative map. SC-2/9 1 12 or 12 � � . n C. M OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA =STAFF REPORT DATF- June 26, 1991 j TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning commission i FROM: Brad Buller, Cit-.Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner I SUBJECT: COVDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-22 VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK - The r 5est to establish an administrative and office use is a leased sj' cn of ;8,100 square feet within an existing iudustz•tal,park in the" General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the :industrial Specific Plan, located at 9495 9th Street APN: 209-032-24. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval :of a Conditional Use Permit fora bank's administrative office. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Industrial buildings; General Industrial District (Subarea 3) South Vacant; General Industrial District (Subarea 3) East Industrial buildings; General Industrial District (Subarea 3) West Single family residences and citrus grove; General Industrial District (Subarea.sj C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North General Indus+trial South General Industx;laT East General Industrial West - General, Industrial D. Site Characteristics: Thk,� proposed use is located within an, existing, fully-developed,; multi-tenant industrial complex. The project site contains two buildings totaling 44,540 square feet and provides up to 20 tenant spaces and 111 parking spaces. ITEM 0 PLANNING COtMiISSION STAFF REPORT CL'P 91-22 - VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK June 26, 1991 Rage 2 1p E. Parking Calculations:' Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Vineyard Wat'l 5,400 1/250 22 20 Bank 2,700 1/1000 3 Dee Dee's 2,700 1/1 faculty 7 7 Dance Studio 1/3 student Jazzercise 3,150 8* 8 Auto Body Shop 13,500 1/400 34 34 Auto Bumper Shop 2700 1400 7 7 Garage Door Co. 2,700 1/500 51 7 Vacant 11,690 1/400 29 29 TOTALS 44540 115 Limited to a maximum of 8 people during normal busines;s`•hours, ;*Because of rounding off, the number of parking spaces provided for tenant square footage exceeds existing narking by one space (112 versus 111 actual). '' II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed use entails the establishmer..t of 5,400 square feet of office and 2,700 square feet .of warehouse space within the Cucamonga Industrial Park, located at 9495 9th Street (see Exhibit "C.). The use involves a non-public office responsible for bookkeeping,!.. `A, storage of bookkeeping materials. Staffing will consist of "`3 proof operators, 5 clerks, 1 computer operator, 1 manager, 1 assistant manager, and 1 warehouse employee for a'total of 12 staff members. If future volume of material exceeds staff"'s capabilities, up to 2 additional employees may be added for a maximum- of 14 employees as indicated by then'applicant. Proposed hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 5.30 p.m., Monday through Friday. B. Issues: The primary issues related to locating this type of use- within an industrial park are compatibility with nurround3ng,uses and availability of parking. The following sections address.-.and discuss these issues: 1. Compatibility of Uses: Administrative ar_d office uses may be permitted within Subarea 3 subject to review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed use is %located within a partially occupied industii.al park. Five tenant uses currently 7 cccr.y tenant spaces including two ;dance studios, one autr• bodyshop, one auto bumper shop, and one garage dod manufacturer. Because of the types of'existing uses, together with the number of employees and noise typically associated with PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF`REPORT CUP 91-22 VINEYARD NATIONAL HANK June 26, 1991 Page 3 the proposed administrative office use, staff believes that tt bank office will not create adverse impacts on surrounding uses. If anything, existing uses may negatively impact the proposed.':Dffice use with noise and other operational impacts. Nevertheless, to ensure control over land use compatibility, the Resolution of Approval contains a condition, stating, "_£ operation of the facility-causes adverse effects, on adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use,." 2. Availability of Parking: The proposed use is located within a 44,540 square foot multi-tenant industrial. complex designed at a ratio of 1 parking space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area, providing a total of 111" parking spaces. Based upon this design requirement, the 8,100 square feet of tenant space was provided a- total of 20 parking spaces. The proposed use involves 5,400 square, feet `of office and 2,7�-'square feet of. warehouse which will require a total of 25 parking spaces (1 parking space for eac1 ..250 square feet of office plus 1 parking space for each 1,000` ,_�are feet of warehouse)., Although there is a discrepancy between parking spaces required and those provided, there are several factors to be considered which may re Ice the potential for parking conflict. First, there is the ,bptaon of providing additional parking spaces within project boundaries. The parking spaces and loading zone areas on the east.side of t.e' tenant space (:see Exhibit "C") could be revised to !rovide four additional parking spaces (see Exhibit"D"). This revision will provide a total of 24 parking spaces -for the proposed use. With 24 parking spaces, a maximum of 24 employees may be allowed, which exceeds the 14 employees anticipated' by the applicant. Secondly, two tenant 1,1,es currently operating within project boundaries (Dee Dee',s ;lance Studio and Jazzercise Dance Studio), could provide ,for a shared parkin as their uses operate at predominantly late afternoon and. evening hours. Dee Dee's Dance Studio offers weekday dance classes from 3:30 p.m.. to 7.00 p.m. and the Jazzercise Dance Studio offers ,laesses from 9:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. and from 4 P.M. to 8:ZZ1 P.M. As'--these use do not Operate continuously during normal business hours.- a shared parking concept may be utilized. Finally, the parking requirement for an office use.is based upon what is commonly needed For an office whic,r'is open to the Sublic, providing parking space-- for both employees and office patrons. This use is different from typical offices in that staffing sizes will be specifically limited to a maximum of 24 employees and the office will not be ;open; to th3 public. Therefore, because of increases in the number of on-site parking spaces, shared parking, and UrAting staff sizes, staff does not anticipate a parking conflict. o- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-22 - VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK June 26, 1991 Page 4Auk - C. Fire District Comments: _ The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District conducted a p?an check prior to.submittrh of the Conditional Use Permit application (see Exhibit_ "F") • and indicated that compliance with all Uniform Fire Code requirements will be required. Ii III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make the following i findings before approving this application: A. That the proposed us-- is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the,,•. Industrial Area Specific _lan subarea in which the site is located,_ and B. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public hea'th, r, - safety, or welfare or materially injurious to propertie, Or imprLvements in the vicinity; and j C. That the use complies with each of the applicable proposed P PP Provisions � of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have been sent to all prg2erty owners within a 300_foot radius of the project site. " V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit.- 91-22 through adoption of the attached'Resolution of Approval. Resp lly su 'tted, Brad ull Cit Planner BD:TG/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Sits Utilization Map Exhibit "C" Site Plan Exhibit "D" Revised Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Floor Plan_ Exhibit "F" - Fire District Comments Resolution of Approval r IMEYARDW ationall-Baxnk 1110 Av 20, 1991 Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ATTN, Erad Buller City Planner RE: Vineyar3 National Bank Conditional Use Permit for 9495 9th Street, Rancho Cucamonga ,= I Dear Mr. Buller: At th3 request of your Department, this letter will set forth the intended use, number of employees-.and other pertinent facts concel;ning the Bank's usage of the above property under the Conditional Use permit regnested. The use will be non-public in that no customer's of the Bank nor other members of the general public will be sent to this location. The staff use of the location will be bookkeeping for two thirds of the area and storage of bookkeeping materials for one third of the area. The bookkeeping purposes will include processing checks and computer entry as well as making up stateme>ts for customers. This sectio n would involve three proof operators, five clerks, one computer operator and a Manager and.Assistant Manager. The warehouse use will be strictly the storage of bookkeeping materials and supplies for the various branch offices. There would only be one persona working in the warehouse area. I would imagine that if in the future the volume of materials increased re might consider adding one or two new employees but we have no present plans to do this. The hoots of operation will be 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 ji.m., Monday through Friday.. AdwfII162iatl0$'USSCC 0-5 \} 9590 Foothill B ._levard•P.O.Box 727•Rancho Cucamonga.California 91730•(714)9ti7 4 �r Brad Buller _ May 20, 1991 i 2 Y I hope that the above ans"ers your questions as to the number of employees, the type -af use and the future intentians. Thank you for your help and cooperation in this matter. 4lneyard National Bank Donald h. Casale Executive Vice President DMC/sc AL gwerT i v ra k --- =I � a _ f 9j if : fy W o -`' OF R�s3rCHO, UGA14+iONGA PLANINTI1V ..I�It�iISIOty �rr.�E: N EXHIBIT: � SCAT E: r1 0 -7 NIN' L s-r 10 'P- o er � �i: CITY OF F�NC� 11 ITEM 6..CUCAMONGA Ti4' PLANNIINO-- DPASION EXHIBIT: SCALE: 10 -� <: Me ,x v �ll i' h O RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT:.. _,- - � tt , ..fJ TO: TO -616ifiPu, PLANNING FROM: SUSAN WOLFE, FIRE.,,, - SUBJECT: VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK, CUP 91-22 DATE: JUNE 12, 1991 After reviewing ' the attached plan, I see no problem,,= with the proposed use of the building as`an office. Based on the floor plan, it is not a public assembly. AM The tenant improvement plans will have '-to go through our plan checker for review. We need more information on the processes/operations in the "auto bumper shop" to the north. What is the ;, occupancy classification. fA o ' _ t , RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'OF THn CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-22, THE ', REQUEST TO ESTABLISH AN ADMINISTRATIVE AND OFFICE USE IN A LEASED SPACE OF 8,100 SQUARE FEET WITHIN AN EXISTING MULTI-TENANT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX LOCATED AT 9495 9TH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT',THEREOF - APN:.:;-'209-032-24. \ ' A. Recitals. (i) Vineyard National Bank has filed an application for the isuuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-22 as described in the :title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution the subj ect ct Canditional Use. Permit request is referred to as "the application." (i.i) On the 26th day of June 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted, a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by zhe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June '26, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Coudnission,hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at`9495 9th' Street with a stroet frontage of 375 feet and lot depth of 300 feet and is presently improved with two industrial buildings totaling 44,540 square feet and III parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north and east of the subject site, contains industrial buildings, the property to the south is vacant, and Property to the west contains a single family residence; and (a) The application proposes the establishment of g.n administrative and office use with a maximum of 14 employees and hours of operation from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. V f PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION 140. CUP 91-22 - VINEYARD NATIONAL'BANK June 26, 1991 Page 2 AIL 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific find+ngq of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows ti (a) That the proposed use is in acelord with the Ganer•al Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the jiurpose6 of the district in wb1ch the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will net be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies. with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the findings arw`conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition Bet forth below. 1) Approval of this request shall: not walra compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and all applicable City ordinances. 2) If operation of the facility' causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, 1 the Conditional Use Permit shall be, brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use. 3) Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all, Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Cods rag ,_:ions have been complied with. Prior to_i cdurtncy, plans shall be _submitted to the Rancho. Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building stall be inspected for compliance prior to occ(?ancy: 4) Any sign proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with t-, omprehensive Sign Ordinance \,and any Uniform Six -program.for the complex and shall zequire—,review and approval by the Planning Division prior to inatcllation. 5) The use shall be limited to a maximum of 24 employees. AML (l QN(j PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-22 -VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK June 26, 1991 Page 3 6) The parking lot shall be re-striped: to provide o > four additional parking spaces (see Exhibit "D" of the June 26, 1991 Staff Report). Upon termination of the use, the site shall be restored to its existing condition which provides three parking spaces and three loading, zones. 6. The Secretary to ttii,s Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED VD ADOPTED THIS 26'TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. ! PLANNING COMMT',aION_OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ; 11 BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Ccmmissio iof the city of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular moeting;of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: �. AYES:. COMMISSIONERS3 NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ;) i / -vIC ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT AWL DATE: June 26, 14,91 C) TO: Chairmar%hand Members of the Pla.3ning Commission FROM Brad B�,xller, City Planner BY: Richa�d Aticorn, Code Enforcement. Superviaor Ij SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMf"liDMENT 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A request to add - Section 17c08.040-P and Section 17.08.070-E to the Development Code establishing property maintenance standards and ongoing ;maintenance requirements . for multiple family dwellings. Staff is requesting a continuance to July 10, -1991, in order to consider this amendmentin conjunction with the development standasds�t „Cdesign guidelines for multi-family residential development. ' Res full %ubmitte7, B d uI Ci Planner BB:ge J� a, tv l` STEM P CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AftF STAFF REPORT DATE: June 26, 1991 TO: chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Buckingham, Planning Technician SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ADDING PET SHOPS AS A PERMITTED OR CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE COMMERCIAL/OFFICE DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN. I. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is for the Planning Commission to review and discuss the proposal as mentioned above. If the Commission can make findings in favor of this proposal, then staff should he directed to initiate and prepare an amendment to the Foothill Boulevard Specifir..°,Plan. II. BACIMROUND: Pet shops are currently a permitted use in the Specialty Commercial (SC), Community Commercial (Cc), and Regional-Related Commercial (RRC) Districts in all four subareas of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (see Exhibit "A"). III., ANALYSIS: The 'FBSP has three land use categories which designate office as the primary use with varying levels of office ielated servicess Office (0), Commercial/office (CO), and mixed use (MU). The Office land use district is intended for professional a,�d administrative offices as opposed to other commercially oriented land uses. The Mixed Use land use district offers the unique combination of high density residential uses, convenience-oriented commercial uses, and compatible office uses. The intent. of the, Commercial/Office District is to provide' , activities which cater to business support and personal services. Typical uses include copy stores, insurance agencies,:' travel "agencies, etc. In addition, all office uses are permitted within the Commercial/Cffice District. This createa the potential for office uses and office support services to be located in the same center. Furthermore, since the FBSP permits pet storeii in all Commercial Districts, there is an abundance.of retail-oriented centers suited for this use. This is .preferable to the Commercial/office District where pet stores could be incompatible,with office uses due to noise from the animals. STEM 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: 'PET SHOPS June 26, 1991 1 Page 2 qP IV. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the .;above analysis, staff feels that the addition of pet shops as either a permitted or conditionally permitted land use to the Office/Commercial District would be inconsistent with the intent- of this district. However, if the Commission can make the appropriate findings, then s,aff should be directed to initiate an;amendment to the Specific Plan. Respec f tly submitted, Brad tiller City Planner p BB-BB-mlg Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Footi-Al Boulevard Specific Plan Land Uses Ex-ai.bit "B" - L!tt"r from Proponent qP ti 1 SUMMARY TABLE OF PERMX TED (X) AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED (0) USgs Subarea We Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four Retail Commercial Uses SC M Q IR P SC M 0 MR SC M M LMR M1 U M1 M ARC IR LI Flcrist Shops . X X x X X X X X X x X Furniture Stores X X X X X X x x Hardware Stores X X X X x Health and Athletic 6yes and )height Reducing Clinics X 0 x 0 Y 0 0 X X* Hobby shops X t r, z x x X xe Ice Crean Stares and Soda Fountains X X X X X X X X X xe Janitorial Services and Supplies > X X X Xa Jewelry Stores X X X X X X x X Laundry (Self Servic e) X X 0 X Leather Goals and ea7gage Stores X X X X_ X x x 7I Liquor Stores 0 0 0 G 0 Q 0 Messenger and Mire services x X x x x x P ltmic, Dance,&M Hartial Arts Studim 0 X D X 0' X x x NLlesaaper and Magazine Stores X' x x x X X x x X x It Nurseries L Garden Supply Stores within enclosed area x X X X x Office.Easiness K::nine and Computer tones - et CP�aint,,Slass, ops )allpap Stare Pet x xX X XX X XX XX XX Photoco 6 X x x x A z x xa ws XX xx xX Restaurants (sit dank a) With entertainment wd/Q serving of alcoholic beverages 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b) Incidential serving of bee- W wine Wt."—A a cocktail lounge,bar, entvtainmt, or dancing) R x c) Cafe limited to 20 scats (including outdam Mating) x x z x x x x x x d) Fast Funds with drivar-tlru 0 D U 0 0 tithout drivr4Jvru Lt 0 0 0 0 Q' 0 0 Soar .,-es, Sale and Repair X X x x `x p` x X x x Specialty Retail 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sporting Goode Storm: a) Sptciaityii back;utki , tenwsis,skiiing, wewan r tar fishing,etc ;m x x X X X x x X X b) aingg i encompassing a vriety'of sports equipment x x IX x Soperarksti x X Swimming Fool Supplies x X z X x Taihar x Televisim,Radio, VCR, Starve ant,CD Component Sales x 3 i 1 IT "14" GR REAL ESTATE nE� E;4t May 10, 1991 C17Y OP RANCHO CUaWo?4GA Chairman of Planning Commission `\A MAYI 3 19 PH of Rancho Cucamonga "l{ �9(1D�1t4�5i6 P.O. Box.807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA ;'1730 RE: Rancho Terrace. Center 9583 Foothill Blvd. Rancrio Cucamonga, CA Dear Planning Commissioner, I am the property manager for the retail center known as Rancho Terrace, locate& at 95al-9525 Fo6thill Blvd, in. Rancho Cucamonga. As you are most likely aware, we'have been experiencing a lot''of trouble attracting quality-,-fa-nilj� <or).entated `businesses to our center because of all the r-4 lncaitions. Currently, we have signed a leas4, subject '.b city approval, for a pet store for 2700 square feet. However, the majority:of all their business, will be tropical fish, birds, reptiles„ piit food, :ud supplies. There will be no sales or grooming of'= `4 dogs or cats. I realized that we may need special approval-4-a,_allow,-Utia use, so I am asking on the behalf of the owner arz tennant,`,, .,,r your c operation in allowing this exception to the yoo;hiii plan, and amending it to allow our tenant's use. Also, in December of 1990, we had our parking list restriped. The use of this tenant does not require any more parking spaces than any other permitted use:-,in the center. I firmll believe that this tenant will not only be a benefit to the center and other businesses, but the city and it� peopie. Please review the situation and let me know it I can tie of any help in the aprroval process. _Thank you. ;1 Sincerely, Michael G. Radema}+,er PRESIDFNT Ink MGR SERVICES, INC. MGR/esp �__1425,V.Foothill Rtvd. 9 Suite 90(? s Upland* CA• 91786 • {7141 481-4466 070 Q2 - JUKE g 19 P. AGENDA--, .,Qf,6 , i PLANNING COMMISSION RE$7LUT't0N NO: CUP 91-17 WILLOWS, COMMUNITY CHURCH June 26, 1991: Page 3 the complex and shall require, review and approval by the Design: Revi64 committee prior to in'stailation. 5) The facility shall be,operated- in conformance with the performance standaj;.de. as definad ' within the Terra Vista Community Plan and the Developmant Code including, but not limited to, Yoiae ..levels. t, 6) Church Servicse or other public assembly (i.e., 50 or more persons)` shall be allowed on weeknights after 5:30 p.m. and on weekends. I 7) "Mommy & Me" classes asso6tated with the church use shall be limited ty a maximum of 29 students and faculty members between the hours of 8;00 .a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. This limit need not 'apply to evening (after 500 p.m.) and weekend classes. In no event shall any other class offered,exYatid the available parkin for this lease space.4 p e. 6. The Secretary to this 'Commission shall certify to the adoption I of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: -. Larry T. McNiel, Chairman r :ATTES.2: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad huller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly' cntrdduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission;of-the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held' on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: `� /� -73 PLXgJlNG COMMISSION'STAFF REPORT' TT 14795 BANLAH INTERNATIONAL June,26, 1991 p Page 2 AM 1� E. Site Characteristics: The Otte, which is <currently vacant, was formerly occupied by three'single family,homes.' The flomea were razed 'some tim' ago in anticipation of gentrificatio",! ofii the site. The property Slopes slightly southward and conttxn no heritage-trees as defined by City Code. `F. Parking Calculat:Eoner, Number of Number of Type Perking ` Spaces Spaces of Use Ratio Required Provided i 13 Three Bedroom 2.0/unit 26 26 Guest .25/unit 3 3 TOTAL 29 `: 24 IT ANAtY5IS: A. General: The applicant proposes to :develop '13. three-bedroom condominiums. The two-story townhouse style units feature two-car attached garages with garage door openers,, private landscaped patios, concrete the roofs,` and multi-pane windows. Project amenities include a spa and cabana, area with concrete sun deck and lattice. shade cover.' A second common area will provide an enclosed tot-lot, barbecues, and a picnic area. Other amenities inclozde interlocking pavers at the entrance and crosswalks, two' trash enclosures, centralized' mail box structure, decorative perimeter fencing, and a driveway 'connection to the adjacent westerly site for future shared access. P. Design Review :Committee: The Committee (CicNiel, Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed the project cn:PMarch 21, 1991, and again on May 16, 1991. They, recommended approval of tha proposed project subject to the following conditions. 1. r A streetacape elevation_should be povided to allow the full Commission to review the proportion of the entry monumentation (see Exhibit "F-1"). 2. A retaining wall ohould be provided, as originally suggested, to eliminate .the slope behind Units 3-10. Provide al minimum 3-foot clear planter area between the perimeter well and the retaining wall. 3. The block wall at thesouth end;of the private yard for Units 1 and 13 should be_.6, feet high. 4. Detail A-2/1 should be revised to eliminate the exposed wood pop-o t trim, reflect this change consistently on all elevations. � i T ,r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOAT RATS: June 26, 1991 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning commission FROM: Brad Buller, City 2lanner BY: Jerry Guarracino, Assistant Planner ` SUBJECT: ENVIRON14ENTAL ASSESSMEtr'P AND. TENTATIVE TRACT 14795 - HANDAR INTERNATIONAL -,A residential, subdivision and design review for 13 condominium units on 1` 23` acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dw6iling units per acre), located on the north side oZ Arrow Route, east of the extension of Msdrone Avenue - APN: 207-201-10, 11, and 24. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 'I I. PROJE-_2 AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The approval he subdivision map and issuance of a Negative Declarat on;`'ala'o approval of ;the conceptual plot plan, grading Plan, landscape plan,'. and building elevations'"for 13 condominium"anus. iiB. Project Density: 10.6. dwelling units per acre. E C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Vacant,,Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling .Y-nits per acre:) - South Single family homes and vacant; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant; Medium Residential, (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West Older single family home; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) e D. General Plan Desi ations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South Medium Residential_(8-14 dwelling units, per acre) East Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) ITEM-� � f7�"i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' TT 14795 - HRNDAH INTERNATIONAL vune 26, 1991 Page 4 hi t f III. -FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The prrJect is consistent with the General Plan and will not be`detrimental to adjacent Properties or cause z1gnifice-it environmental impacts. In addition, the ,proposed use' is in compliance with the appiic4: a provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. IV. COfRESPONDENCE: This item:hac been advertised' in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin..newspaper as al public hearing, tt.e property has been posted,. and '.notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet o£"the hoject site.. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff lrjfWommends that the Planning Conuission ' issue a_mitigated Negative Declaiation and approve Tentative Tract -= 14795, ,and the related Design Review, subject to the Conditions: of Approval', through adoption of the attached '`Resolutions of E Approval. r Respe u11y submitted, - Brad uller City Planner / 4 I . BB:JG/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Oite Utilization Exhib;t "8" Tentative Tract Hap Exhibit "C",- Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" Site Flan Exhibit "E" Conceptual Lkndscak"p� -an Exhibit "F _Elevations - Exhibit "G" Flo',r Plans Resolution of Approval for'TT14795 Resolution of Approval for Design Review"of "TT14795 i PLi,NNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' TT 34795 HANDAH INiEWATIONAL June 26, 1991 Page 3 5. The private open space for Units 7 and 8 should be ,increased by moving the fencing out to the front entry. 6,. A connection to the public sidewalk should be provided, via a 4-foot walk east of the driveway. 7 A revised cabana plan should be provided to include the following-changes: a. ?lace the spa equipment: within the storage room. b. Provide a sink and .avatory in place of one shower., c. The'shower need not be enclosed. The applicant has Iexpressed a willingness to comply with all of the above recommendations and the appropriate conditions have been added to the attached Resolution. C. Technical Review Committee: `The Committee reviewed the project and determined that, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consittGnt with all applicable standards and ordinances. f D. Environmental Assessment: fart I of the Initial .Study has been completed by the applicant. Part-II "of the Initial Study, the Environmental Checklist, was completed by staff It was found that although the project may have a significant effect nn the ,environment, there.will not be a significant effect if the following mitigation measures, as identified in Part I of the Initial Study, are incorporated into the project design: I. Noise.:. The project is subject to 'significant noise impacts along Arrow Route. A preliminary acoustical study has been :prepared which identifies mitigation measures needed to bring the site into conformance with City noise standards. A final acoustical report will be submitted to identify precise measures which must :ae incorporated into the final project design. 2. On June 7, 1989 the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance 395 which` establishes policy for a condition to be placed on all pending residential projects to ensure adequate school capacity. This.;ordition is included as Standard ConditionNo. 5. Staff recommends'issuance of a-mitigated Negative Deolaration subject to the above mitigation measures being added as Conditions of Approval for the project. g11-75 ]..�V d ZW W E a i4 P. ffrY W z u ,�3t s 'W 3g° 3iag_ N4WR WdegP @ug s>3 E- 3anZ a i3Sc u a_i cai 4P —uR q Lo t/) •W W l {� � �N•ate` � � jt,\ i H WO L1i O §W {;•4Y/ N� Qyam _ Y f P1J � �o wWoO� t` a"c J u i Xf T >�e 2V=MW40iio � - --- 99 454 w � IHjl� o i rrEM:1%l�/79.5' CITY OF WCH�i;tuCAM6NGA r- PLANNIN' I f�t31XSION T rrW: -24 A`I VF N EXHE3rr:t �I SCALE: Z b tils II 1 �V-"� ! �-7�_L-ILL• �..1 I � (�:L�4 yLll�'�° r•,(• �±- �-, a3 � �tl �h •.y "L�a L'f(�U j� i ..iw r.•a:uwv � �..�.-r�c�•.�.�y 1 ,) N SITE U71LJZATION MAP S:1au0'-O' ' i'73 HINT CONDO DE4ELOPAENTTr 14795 ANDAN INTERNATIONAL INC. i j �� j j8526-8644 ARROW ROUTE aaoa�vap,ti avaar3rmr. s.rsrr r.a.twa eso RANCHO CLICAMONSiACA 'u.3eraabrtuana r.ea3anaasr.rcn�alea-c�ua OF I3TC 'f h�tvUCAMC3NA PLANNi1tG• DITISIOIeT EXHIBIT: I SCALE -- �_.Fr•�c,.. Ftv% " ICINITY MAP TYPE 3 tAK itImv - g •c ' s _ e �; PROJeCT LOCATION RLtTf,!! .wn. n+vr..a•r�nsr+...s IYWQ�A• w� IRS .....r...�.., mbv:a' it vu uernc�ue,+u✓n. i Ga4e•MF�.nIM•I i ,r.�r..� a dab rli-^6rLal.yp M h� �•.n. - '-�' So1iML.t•14M4 A •D•.MB.•s..pr _ r [e ��1 IMNA.A►�f*q�LOf.MM.m OI u1{>tiL ' +� y Iti.RY P4.1 M!r U,nMI M •v S^ "� �e Is.IMC p'WRW rpraMa..k>Y,; ..R..,. ...+b ' 1 !-•^ . g, -'p ,,y, TT! Rt...WVMf. 'I...tTM • Rip R.sI llr oYb np �.I� .r P� �� IOF.�blli h1 - IlI M.� R•r � v CITY OF AAZHO�t-UCAMONGA rrEM: PLANi1�iN�°T-E3IVISION nTLE:_S;T"e: t21. N. ExHMrr•' SCALE: 'T �' �.,.._ > z v o =+e 11 a 9 �! `�'� �•s� p �•ne CIE- gR�� rn x —.. .._"_ — ee ti zv WL cti !l 9y1E1 togo Afth .�r. 4l/ U ..xe _• .. _ r � ^ z<_+{'+i =Rz LO OD g.95 at s _ 4` e eat r '� ®� �•� � ap - ----------- �=a�s p•4w - ITEM• 7—/' --7-95— ;3 K,-UCAMONGA ` PLANNING-6 ION TTrLE:('.��c. 1���;�a.7 N' EXHIBIr:'C," SCALBE.' a�7 I STTIMSCAPE ELEVATM rrEM I CITY OF IT�I ( ; UCAM4N�E� TTTLE: r 7" ,'�' PiAP�TM to Ji '01MSION 1 EXWBrr:`i�1" SCALE: 1 s 1 LL- l�i•O11�lU`t�l --- r.-------� �r tip• ° i C, , �' ..ellAtt s3 ,.� ,•,. ,.�^ ems. ,...rr� t r r�RI���tSol Q. +� i+ t •ate \ 401�1--.Li .._ .,1�;>•;`'.i1��% a$i!: I. � a.:yv fr cG ,�.... j �-'.`r i>,'•�; 0 O i ,+•�•cJ04g1�'+• MO-V'JNorivo oONONW8 q 7:,A I u.s.wt+w..w.n isc alma M02ldtl3'198 9Lii6 _ C c VI ItlNOI1tlNtl31Nl HYONY arsm j1 4N31RdO13A30 QONI)7 I INn�+ c i I t�-I 1 _ � •� it --IR- „ ri «a; • • e �e s'ma. va,: nr. I ' .iit�l:t j f 4man ENNUI u::' lr :::: , .`�.::. tNY-1lil�tlllq/•lMl�i{i�fit{pl uuaiaw.ro.i tl0 YlJtWYYYO(10 OHONtltl # a tF Oii/W•Lii/i!i/•d tit t ,aausai.er.iv rv�u►oi. BALnou MOlIHY SFY9®-qr,% ' _ONI7YHOLLYMll31N1 1 ONYH 96LVL .IA OSMO.13 ONOa1fNflE�s�'�!�:j►` •� f IR e �u I pH t �m t A t. � r h� � ■■rr� r■■ir 4C�Pj ■■aa 5 Ar. 5����i■ra� — td 1 �r,uHl� �■ur �Sf � J■ �..ccccr• t� r p A A S yrc- ;t 4,-r 1' ly i MIR la—m, aau� f_I— f.■■■■ I_r.l I% ■aai ,� fur =: t�woara� i=1 j_1 �iiei�- 4_¢� ■■K \ 4.■u■j._ yyy ! recta■. a.. •°r� � ` t ��� c ,4 ff {ra x f r`s*-• ' - �fu rt �4' +��w .r,�`:' '•Ate,: py. '. —- �i t�'. �k. 1 r�r 6,�,. /'� _i J_ v ��«I4 � ��iar �: vvvv :n.' { �aua t.v 6 �� 11Q — ®. �\ ��ipvilii r� / lar�_'1 �^ram• �=/ 1�= j,�f � Imo/ � . ,r%Giri � �aer �sa�j �'.-".".'^_ � � I �of verpa r �® __ r�rry i t 131 uarl i;_ _. - pis I"` �aia r�� I� � ����F�� �� �M.' y; I� j �ir I I� , �«: I— �` L�}_. _ '� 'p.R.,� � 11 `y 111 } (� x ''' .;, "Y —� �'F 4 !1 1' .�` ,�.'. rr 1 4 `' _ cws-:sa a�a n wa-st:u�srYa 'VO V-NOWYot o ONONVU ocl arrla•wso.+a ~ act varow una Roe T vnwascaaewrnamruxunw ' 31t70�fAROt1tlYYYq^8-9Z88' 4 ONI INOiS IUSININVONY -SN3WdOXiA3000NO� IN(tEl t .E}j, -a l LT a 71, Ak -y f r r+a r� I �__ tOOF=ffl.Ifl�f4',sffffilfiflAa r sf+,ssarrsofss� tla aora4►rvana aNONva• ssc mf�safsa,fq•,�,fs l 3.Lft0lt PA0aaV989H 9E9B+� � a I t f'I waauw.w. I ` .� .= IYNQLLJNtl31N1 NYa YM iN3Y0d0MA30 OQNOO AIAFA Ella r -.................. a � fir 0 e 1j1 �^J7 l /q 70, t{ lC.�t?r 1�6�Ceng �X Iv► ! t r i10B•iBlfel Bl:�t•'IBBB•[B[IB1B1M; eit1B Ba wwm eB WO 70/00BWDn*OHOM, d i ausaue 4rsy/"""0t $AI4A MOIL4M 21,9a-Om -UNI lVNOLLVNG31Pli NVONVg. 5���� �{1 0ryd�0i� +,'! £l i :'NO � ` T .' 77 a ' 1 - 1 ti t I i jr -i 4 Ila o i 1 i f q�,w-s:` ,awe r- 'p•,; + —_,� TT /y {Moor pl4rl jEF/1-11 e3i /`7 / • �„_ L06Y/!lblHai'u:?!aIXl1CN.! '1Mp iT6'Y tK - t 'LtL'\ltL8i11mMY10'1oR1.'1PJfQ11� mnmmowv 1 FONIIVNOIIVH831NIHYON1l SSVO& JA imm%oww OCNOD•L)w1 a �-- y a ' �a �rf IFI is W t_ -fie •. Y 3 3 ff _ o ¢ j ddlk .u�afa++iaw.a Vo lf'TJNQWtl:�R'J ON9Ntla lI it . .w; y'"" anoan+oaavrtise-szse 2��•�=1 (�I am ltlRlouVNtl31NI Ntlaava Sfa1�`b ,LL dNBWao on30 oalloo iiNn��; i do - t .� o � .-i•9 t „ T- 1 i .. I TT��( CIS /cx�- inn F 13f i C, _ 6a�trroatl rf't00!•tBRltttlRC sinssa'wc - Y�Y3kOWtl^..t1�GNJNtl!! i roavwr.w.•b us •im/etwm 'hwsisuxr 3anaa MOM B►ga-ozoo 5(: aNrIVNwlwNU31Ni Nr®Nv S���C 1J AMMO a 30 CONO3 uNn etl C� T.. o YiCipp>—�� iAuk - �? ci i r• Z^ 7 I q?5S PIC, r-Z PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14795 - HANDIM INTERNATIONAL June 26, 1991 Page 2 (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (a) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the sdWl; -,`pion is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable,,injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (a) The tentative tract is not 1 1W(ly to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design- of the tentative `tr4t6t w 11 not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at now of record, for access through or use.of the property within the propose;h� sv�odivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and a `tt�tftas that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the; California Envirormental Quality Act of 197U and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth, in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application 'subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. . Eng, earino Division 1) The existing overhead utilities (type to be determined, during plan check) on the project side, of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded from the pole located at the west project boundary to the pole .located at the east project boundary (poles to be removed). 2) Remove and replace the meandering sidewall 'as necessary to construct the project drive approach. 3) Street trees shall be-'installed per Engineering standards. A street, tree easement may be necessary where street trees are placed ion private property. 6. The Secretary,to this Commission shall certify .to the adoption of this Resolution. /1 Ask RESOLUTION NO. A RES!.UTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,' CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOV 14795, LOCATED AT 8626-44-ARROW ROUTE IN THE 1—VDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING :UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 207-201-10, 11, AND 24. 1 A. Recitals. )j (i) Handah International has filed an applicatJlxon for the approval Of Tentative Tract Map No. i4795 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th`day of June 1991, the Planning Commission of the, City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on then application and concluded said hearing on that date. (III) All legal prerequisites prior to the'L,loption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby, found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follower 1. This commission hereby specifically finds That all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based-upon substantfal evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public-,-hearing on June 26, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, togother with public testimony, thiti Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 8626-44 - Arrow Route with a street frontaga of 192 feet and lot depth of 280 feat;and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, ` the property to the south of the site"consists of vacant and single family homes, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is a ' single family home. 3. Based upon the substantial, evidence presented to this commission during the above-referenced public hearing,and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conca,tdes as follows: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General'�Plan, , Development Code, and specific plans; and _T- 2.3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14795 ^ HANDAH INTERNATION_AL'� June, 26, 1991 r li Page 3 i APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. �t PLr%NNING COMMISSION OF,THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST' Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Hulle =, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Cicy or'Rancho Cucamonga, do 'heieby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and. regularly introduced, passed, and adopted'b the Y Planningcommissio n of the Cityof l' Rancho Cucamonga, _ga, at a regular mc.atng of the Planizing Commission held_..,:. on the 26th day of June 1991,<by the following ngte-tc-wit: AYES. COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ADA Comoleaon Dam. This condition shall be waived it the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school Impacts as a result of this project. 6, Nor to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits whan no map is involved,written certification 1,10mtheaffectedwaterdistrict that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve th;proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. much letter must have been issued by the water district Within 90 days priorto final map approval in the case of subdivision orpriorto issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 8.Site DDevalopment ✓ 1. The site shall be developed and mointained in accordance with the approved plans whiwh inckide site plans, architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program, and grading on file In the Planning Division,the conditions c orralr ed herein, Development code regulations,and Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2. Pnor to any use of the project she or business acttivily being camntenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the sa islacttic^of the City Planne, — 3. Occupancyof the facility shall notcommenae until such time as all Unffonn BuiWing dot;ur nd _/J State Fire Marshall's regulations have been compiled with. Prior to occupancy,plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dlsiric.and the Building and Safety / Division to show compliance. The bulding shall be Inspected for compliance prior to occuiancy 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be .—J---Jt submitted for City Planner review and approval pror to issuance of buildirj permits. 5. All site,grading,landscape.irrigation,and street improvement plans sham be coordinated for J—f-- consistency priorto issuance of any permits(such as grading,tree removal,encroachment, building etc.).or pry "a tkW mats apprwiat In the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has c orn;isenced,whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive catriptianoe with all sections of the Development J_./_ Code,all other applicable City Ordinances,and apple&*, a Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Buckling Permit issuares. 7.A detailed on-site lighting plan shaft be mmwed and approved by the City Planner and Sherlfl's Department(989.6611)prior to the issuance of buikftrg pemtits. Such plant shall indicate style,illumination,location,height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. it no centraiizedtrash receptacles are provided,aft trash plot-up shall be for individual units J J f with all receptacles shielded from public view. V 9. Trash receptacles)are required and shall meet City standards. The final deso,'k=tions, and the number of trash receptacles shall be&tied to City Ply mr review and approval prior to issuance :building permits. 10.All ground-mounted utility appurtenartees such as tran forrrinrs,RO condensers,etc.,shall be located out of public view and adequately screewid through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls,berming, andlor landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner- SC-2/91 2or12 77-2- MTV our DEPARTMENT OF CUCANIONeA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'TANL)AKL) U No S b 0 N [)I T I Ok ?A PROJECT#: SUBJECT: tt J APPLICANT: Illrl, CLE f .�1 r r'✓1 .T.. �i L r�. LOCATION: 9 90(o —�/G{ lirrCu3 12v.Te Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714)988-i861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMONS: A. Tim e LimRta Qmwwm i Aft- V t. Approval shall expire,unless extended by the Planning Commission,If building permits are not issued or approveduse!-,&4 riot commencedwithin 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to i I fir/ 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of _/_f._ 4. The developer shelf commence,participate In,and consummate orcausetobecommenced, _J--J— participated in,or consummated,a Mello-Roos Community Facilities Dist(CFO)for the Rancho C•.icamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance W a fire station to some the development. The station ahali bs located,designed,and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection DistFW,and shall become the Districts propcity upon completion. The equipment shah be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any bu3&V of a station,the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations.The CFD shall be tanned by the District and the developer by the tone recordation oi•the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuwm a'buildin g permits,whichever comes first.the applicant shale consort to, or participate in,the establishrnont of a'Mew-koos Community Facilities District for the constnaction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However,if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District,the applicant shall, in the afte.molve,consent to the anmation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits,whichever comes first.Further,tithe affected school distract has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Fas Z419s District within twelve monaths'tom the date of approval of the,project end prior to the recordation of the final map or issuar ra of building permits for said project,this condition shati be deemed null and void. SC-2/91 1 of 12 — tp Comr4e¢od Date 3. Standard patio.cover plans for use by the Homeowners'Association shall be submitted for I�J_ City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building pennies. 4. Ail roof appurtenances,including air conditioners and other root mourrted equipment ar'vor _./—/— projections,shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building;cans. C. Parking and Vehlcu ar Access(Indicate & 911a on building plans) 1. All parking kit landscape Islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/— contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall(includirrl curb). Z2. Textured pedestrian palhways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be �---�— providedthroughout the development to connect dwell Ingslunlisibuildingswith open spaces/ / plazasirecreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, JJ entrances,and exits shall be striped per City standards. _ ✓ 4. All units shall be provided with garage dear openers; J_J f S. Mie Covbnards,Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreatiorial vehicles or,this this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit / parking on interior circulation aisles other than in deelgimted visitor parking areas. ✓ 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner; City Engineer,and -_!J Rancho Cucamonga Fire Pro£c-."n 06,trkxreview and approval prdorto issuance of building parmits. E. Landscaping(for publicly maintained larAscaps areas,ra°ec to motion N.) ✓ t. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, s and model home la pl ng iape(�attiirrg landscap- ing in the case of residential development, snail be preparers by er'i�nsed lanascape architectand submittedfor Cky Planner reviewandapproval prbrto the Lasuanceof building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdlvtsioti, 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shad be protected with a constmotlon barrier J—/_ in acoordancewith the WnScipalCode Section 19.08.110.and so notod*)n the grading plans. Th bcatio,�rcurl?hosetn3e:3tobeproseivedinp6m and now iocatbrsfortranspiantedtrees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. heappkimsWfolklwailotthearborlst's re�.mmandations regarding W.8servation,trans jianticals and trimming me'drsds. J / ✓ 3. Amirimunrof S�treespergrossacm,coniprisedcfthefol rgsl=es,sha�`bepro,.zded _1--J within the project: --T %-48-inchboxoriarger, Q %-36-Inch b;ixorlarger, 9'a 2e-inch box or larger, %-I"allon,and -8-- %-S gallon. 4. A minimum of Y;of trees planted wfthln the project shall be specimen size trees- _ ! — 24-inch box or larger. _ 5. Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one is gaiion tree for every thrje: parking stalls,sufficient to shade Me of the parking-area at solar moon on August 21. ) — 2191 4oria 1—� C-trii um Dam.. 11.Street narrms shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with 'JJ_ AShk / the adopted Street Taming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12.All building numbers and individual units shall be Identified in a clear and concise mariner, including proper illui-i inalfon. 13.A detailed plan Indicating trail widths,maximum slopes,physical conditions,fencing,and weed comic),in accordance with C€tp Master Trail drawing,;,shall 5e submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordation ofthe FinaiTract Mapandprior to approval of atreet improvement and grading plans.Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails,including fencing and.drainage d6vices,in conjunction with street improvements. The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions(CC&Rs)shall not prohibit the keeping of equine animals where zoning requirement;forthe keeping of said animals have been met.Individual lot owners In subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners'associations for amendments to the CCBRs. 15.The Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions(CC&Rs) and Articles of incorporation of the —J— _/_ Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering D.-Visions and the City Attorney.They shall be e. mrded concurrently wish the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. ✓__16.Allparkways,open areas,and landscaping shall be permanently maintained bytteproperty JJJ_ owner. homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17.Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the Tight to receive sunilght across adjacent lots crunits for use of a solar energy system.The easements may be contained in L Declaratcm of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded ccricurrenfly with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits,whichever corms first.The eawments shag prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation,sinuctures,fixtures or any C twr object,except for utility wires and similar objects,pursuant to Development Code Sechlon 17.08.060-G-2. 18.The project contains a designated Historical Landmarks. The site shall be devetv`per9 and J._/ maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Aseration Permit No. . Any further modifications to the site Including,but not limsed to,extartor afterations and/or interior altoratiens which affecttheexte dorofthebuildingsorStWures,removaloflandmark trees,derwItion,relocatioft,reaorEst ucticnofbuildingsorstruaturea,orohangestotheshe, shall require a modification to the Historc Landmark Alteration Pumtitsubject to Historic Preservattri Commission review and approval k° C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic trot water for all dwelling Units and for heating any swimming pool or spa,unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalentcapacityandefficiency.All swimming pools.€nstalled atthe time of initial development shaft be supplemented with'solar heating. Details shalt be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for C.`'R€ariner review and prior to the issuance of bull irtg perfrtits. approval �!2. All dweiri tits shall have the front, side and ra.r elevations upgraded with architectural treatment,detailing and increased deNneatfan cf surface treatment subjW to City Planner revew and approval prior to issuance of building permits. SC-Zhu 3 of 12 F.Signs ranoleeon Date- 001, 1. The signs indi=ed on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a parl of thisapproval. Any signs proposed for this development shall crmplywith the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by r— Inning Division priorto installation of any signs. 2. AUniformSign Program fcr4��d�%developmentshallbe submitted forCitypfar.ner review and --JL—J— approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s)shall be provided for apartment,condominium,or townhomes _l prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.Environmental —t. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Roca Cresherproject in astandard format as determined by the City Pia,rner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted —J---J— Special Studies Zone for the Red kill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any Property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. —4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and app,.,4al p,-irr to the --J i issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the revel of intsrior raise attenuation to below 45CNEL,the bui!ding materials and constnlcuan techniques provided, AW and it appropriate,verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures.The building plan,will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contalned In the final report. H.Other Agencies 1. EmeMerx;yseccndaryacCessshallbepmvidedtnaccordancowithRancimCuCamangaFire —�--�— .otection District S'tar—_Ards. 2. Emergency access shall be provided,maintena,Ie[me and clear,aminlinumof26teetwide at all ti"s during construction in awofdance wfih Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements: 3. Prior to issuance of building per-tits for o0mbust1W oDnstruCtlon, evidence shall be _i._/_ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection DWftthat temporary water supply for i fire protection Is evaiiaab;e,pending complslion of required tiro protection system. 4. The applicant shall C9ntat t the U.G.Postal Ssrvice to determine the appropriate type and _J_J_ location of mail bores.ftifulti-faftly residential developments sisal)provide a solid overhead stnicture for mail boxes wfth adequate lighting.The final location of the mail boxes and the design of than overhead structure shard be subjettt to Cky Planner review and approval-ter to the issuance 0 building permits: 5. For projects using septic tank facilities,written celti!iration ot,aoceptabil'ty, including all `-J_ suppaitive information,shall ba obtained from the San eemprdino County Department of Environmental Flaakh and submitted to the twilling Official prior to I. issuance of Septic Tank Permits,and p7:orto issuance of building permits. SC•2/91 Goft2 ^3/ rt k Lk�a; Erp=t NO.:- 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at L rate of one Qmpi"O"o.e: tree per 30 linear feet of buiiding. 7. All private slope banks 5 feetor less in vertical height and of S:i orgreatersIbpe,but less than —JJ 2:1 slope,shall be, at minimum,irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall incii!de apermanent irrigation / system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. y 8• All private slopes in excess of 5 feet,but less than 8 feet In vertical Night and of 2:1 orgreater —�—�— slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften theirappea.�Ance as follows:one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.ff.of slope aroa,1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq.ft.of slope area,and appropriate ground cover.in addition,slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 2-30 sq.ft.of slope area.'frees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clustors to soften and vary s"plane.Slspe planting required by this se0lon shall include a permanent irigalbri system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development,aft slope planting and irrigation shall be continu —J_/ ouslymaintainedinahealthyandth..,ingconditiongythedeveloperuntileachindividualunit is sold and occupied bythe buyer.Prior to releasing occupancy fo;those units,an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 10.For multi-family resdential and non-residential developms.3,property owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site,as weer as contiguous planted areas within the public Tight-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and det;&,and iriintained in a healthy end thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, :ertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead,diseased,or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of da,�nage. 11.Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Cafe arid/or street trees and slope planting. r-- This mquirement shall be In edition to the required I .. i 1/12.T`;e a;design of the,perimeter parkways,wails,Ist�dsca ng,and sidewalks shall'be 00 ad In the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Coy Planner review and approval and coordinated forconsistvX7wah any parkway iarsdscaping plan which may be / required by the Engir+eering Division. 13.Special land ,ape features such-w claw,al1~jvial rock.specimen 3lze trees.meander- alic5(UM horftorW change),and intensified landscaoft,is rMpIred along £ 14.Landscap.Vtp and irrigation systems required tobe installedwithinthepublic right-of-wayon _/,:_ the perimeter of this project area shall be ooflihmusly maintained by the developer. +�15.All walls shall beprovidedwitndecorativetroatment.ifksc 6d Inpubibmaintenanceareas, �_/_ the design shah be Coordinated with the Engineering®lvia'on. _16.Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submNtsd for City Planner review and _e!_ g approval prior to 13auance of building pennies. These criteria shalt emourr,ge the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree speciss. 17.Landscaping and InVation shall be designed to consgrye water through ftprinciples of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 cf the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 41 5or12 T -30 kA Compleoan Dates 6. As a custom-lot subdivision,the following requirements shall be met: a.Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing campletion of all on-site —�—�-- drainage facilities necessary, for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priortofinal map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b.Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage wator that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels,are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c.On-site drainage improvements,neCsssary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided properties,are to be installed prior to issuance of t2uik$!N permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows en;. 5tg, leaving,or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety --I J— Division for approval priorto issuance of building and grading permits.(This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e.All slope banks in excess of 5'feet in vertical height sL-dl be seeded with native grasses __J__J orplarned with gmufidcoverfor erosion control upon coinpietbnof grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be com*tedto the satisfactionof the Building Official.In addition a;permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the appllicant'datvebper,from compliance,with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.0401 of the Devebprmnt Coda. APPLICANT S14ALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714)989.1= FOR COMPLIANCE WITH T HE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L.Dedication and Vehicular Access, 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all Interior public streets, community traits.public.paseos,public landscape areas.,street trees,and public drainage facilities as shown on:,ae plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities(=ss-lot d stage,focal fer„der trails,etc.)shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative ma;, V 2. Dedicate t shall be made of the forowing rights-of-way on tale perkmterstrests (measured from street centerline): 60 ,,,,.total feet on 0.4,L c� 19c-: total feet on Total feet on total feat on 3. An irrevocable offer ofdeftation for—-foot wide roadway easemerasMIbemade for all private streets or drives. Z4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to/the Cit)I i the following streets: Der n.r ��a - �,75^_Qs!i� /`rLYLf1„P:A 9 O�tn. , S. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring mess to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrenIty with the slap or prior to the issuance of 1 building permits,where no map is tnvoiv,:d. SC-a191 9or12 ?_�� 'ITt<1��i5 Completion Dam:: APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR COMPLiANCE WiTH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 01Site elopmeat The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Buiidi,:.t Code,Uniform Meahani -J <— cal Code,Uniforn Plumbing Code,,National Electric Code,and all other applicable codes, ordinances,and regulations in effect at tt,; time of issuance of relative pemiits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling units)or major addition --�--1— to existing unit(s),the applicant shallpaydevelopmentfees at the established rate.Such fees may include,but are notlimitedto:City BeautificMion'Fee,F vk Fee,Drainage Fee,Systems Development Fee,Permit and Plan Checking Fees,arc,:xlxool Fees; 3. Prior to Issuance of 13r,Ung permits for a new commercial or Industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include,but are riot limited to:System Development Fee, Drainage Fee,School Fees,Permit and Plan Checking Fees. J 4.Street addresses shall be provided bythe Building Official,affertracth:... ' 2precordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J.Existing Structures _ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for.the property line clearances considering use,area,and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Exu tirrg buildings shall be made t�c6mply with correct building and zoning regulations for �--�-- the n.o::ded use or the building Shall be demolished. I!3 Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed,filled atd/orcapped to oomply with the �!�! /� Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. V 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plaits submitted for building permit application. K.Grading 1. Grading of the sublW property shall be In accordance with the UW%,Tn Building Cods,City �--� Grading Standards,and accepted grading practices.The final grading plan shall be in s sutx@anUaJ conform with the approved grading plats. —2. A soils repot shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of !a to --�---� perform such work. 3. The development is fof a-ted within the soll erosion control boundarles;a Soil Disturbance _lJ� Perralt is required,Please contact San Bernardino Courtly Departrltentof Agrlcultdroat(714) 387-2111 forpemtit application.Documentation of such perms shall be submitted to the Ci►y prior to the Issuance of► ugh grading perrnit• 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer orgecfcglst and submitted at i the time of application for grading plan Check. S. The final grading plans shall be completedand approvedpriorto issuanceof building permits. sc-:isl 7of11 S-3 Z P—t N, - Notes: (a)Median island includes l3ndsc ,ap'ng irrigation and on meter.. (tr)Pavement reconstruction and ovariayswill be determined during plan check. (c)It so mark:M,sids- walk shali be curviline :r per STD.304. (d)If so marked,an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item(g) T em" z�cj . ,_„ u 4., Improvement plans and constriction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights,prepared by regis- tered Civil Engineer,shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Eno ineer ind the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improve- ments,prior to final map approval orthe issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. b. Pr'or to any word;being performed In public right-of-way,fees shall be paid and a —J construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engfneoes Office in addition to any' Other permits required. c. Pavement striping,marking,traffic,street name sign!rg,and Interconnect conduit _/J_ shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal cort�euRwdh pull boxesshalibeinstaliedonanynewconstnxaiororreconstmcWn _( of major,sexndary or collector streets whim intersect with other rt*r,secondary or coiiector streets for future traffic signals.Pull boxes shag be placed on both sides of the street n3 feet outside of BCR,FCR crony otherlocations apprcved Who City Engineer. Notes: MM (1)All pug boxes shall be No.6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall tee 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope e. Wheel chair ramps shall be Installed on all four comers of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads rek Iring construction shah remain Open to tra+Sc at all times with —l_! adequatedetoutaduringconstnmgbn.Astreetcb3urepurnkmaybe regiked.Acash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shag be refunded upon CdrtrplABLO of the constnxxion todte satisfaCHM of tfte City Engineer. g. Concentr2leddrainagefirfws shag notoosssidewalks.Undo!sidewalk drains shall be _JeJ Installed to City Standuds,except for si q:o famly lots h. Handkmp accost ram design shall be as specified by His Cky Engineer. / i. Street names shall be approved by ttie City Plannerprkirto submItal forfirst plait check. S.Street improvement plan per Cky Standards for all private streets shall be provided for _J_J— review and approval by the Cky Engineer. Prior to any workfaekg pedorried on the pri- vate streets, fees shall ba paid and constn kirk permits t3tt81t be obtained from the Cky Engineo►'s Office in addition to any other permits mired. 6.Street trees,a minirnrm of 1-4allon sae or larger,shall be installed per City Standards in /_-_-J— accordance with the CIVS stride',tree program. mw SC-2/9 t 10 of 12 Pmlect Vo., 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated comPua� oar: or noted on the final map.AM— _/ - 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: Uwe hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the constructlin of(residential)buildings(or other structures)within those areas designated on the map as building rest-:,�icn areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's, 8. All existing easements lying withinfuture rights-of-way shall bequitclalmedordaiineatedon _)___r_ tha f In al al map. V 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed,otitside the public right-ot-way _J_J_ shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10.Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes,t,°provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs,if curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane,a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11.The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests _( -t necessary to construct the required public improvements,and if hefshe should fail to do so, the developer shall,at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval,enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for Me improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developsrof all costs Incurred by the City Alk to acquire the off-site property interests required In connection with the subdivision.Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in Pie amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer,at developers cost.The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M.Street Improvments 1. All public improvements(Interior streets,drair;: facilliMs,comrxrnity trails,paseos, _ landscaped areas,etc.)-shown on the plans and)or terttative map shall be constructed to City Standards. interior street improvemmsnts shall Include,but are not limited to,curb and gutter,AC pavariiint.drive approac,'rAj si lewalki.street ri ts,and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement,within a 40 4cot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constnicted for all half-section streets. 3. Constrict the following Perirleter street imtproverients Including,but not limited to: STREET XME CURB& C. SM,1, DRIVE SIP= SIT= COMM. MEDIAN OUTIER PVMT WALK APPR. UGH73 TREES TRAIL UXI) OTHER Ce-) SC-2/91 9 if 12 ;j proms\n.: Completion Dmr: 4.A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within RS.Nht-of-way. 5.Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe - measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6.Pub.:ic stone drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows m the event oI a —�- blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P.Utilities 1.Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas,electric power,telephone,and cable N(all underground)In accordancewith the Utilitj i Standards.Easements shall be provided as required. 2.T he developer shall be responsible forth&relocation of existing utilnws as necessary. 3.Waierand sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the L--J_— Cucamonga County Water District(CCWD),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distri 1. and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Se,aardino.A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Q.General Requirements and Approvals ' 1.The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined Into —�^--�— one parcel prior to Issuance of building permits. 2.An easement for a ioint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of buifdirig permits whichever occurs first,for:%/c)/Je e 3.Prior to approval of the final reap a deposit shall be posted with tha City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessrnants under A.ssssament District among the newly created parcels. 4.Etbwanda!San Sevaine Area Reg onal Mainline,Secondary Regional,aid Master Plan Drainage Pees shall be paid prior to final trap approvalor priori lkling perntilt issuance it no map is involved. 5.Permits shall be oWakwd from the following agencies for walk within their rlgk;*I-way: 6.A signed cansM and waivar form to Join and/or Ito rlt:tfie Law Enforcement Gommurtm., Facirrlles District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to fiscal map uWavat or the issuance of bulling pewits.whichever occurs first.Fomtation costs shall be home by the Developer 7.Prior to finalisation of arty development phase,suffident Improvement plane shag be com- J J pteted beyond thep hasa.boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satlsfaction of the City Engineer,Phase boun jafbes shall correspond to lot lines shown .l on the approved tentative neap. 12 of 12 2—3 L[ Pmim No., Z7.Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with completion Date, adopted policy.AlIkk _J_J a. On collector or larger streets,tines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, J including driveways.Wails,signs,and slopes shall be located outside the tines of sight.. Landscaping and other obsbuctions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeabiifty improved,usually by _/_/_ moving the 2+/•closest stroal trees on each side awayfrom the street and placed in a street tree easement. 8.A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS !or any work within'N..Nfollowing right-of-way: ____J .:._ 9.All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the —�--/ issuance of building permits; N.Public Maintenance Arun 1.A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards —f— shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval pdGr to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.The following landscape parkways, medians,pasaos,easements, traits,or other areas are required to be annexod into the Landscape Maintenance District: Aftk ✓ 2.A signed consent and waiver form to join andlorform the appropdate Landscape and Lighting _1_!_ Districts shall be filedwitll the Ctty Engineer priortoIIml map appmvalor Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first.Formation costs shalt be bome by flse developer. 3.All required public landscapMg and Irrigation aystems shall becon inucus!y maintained by the _J_J_ developer until accepted by the City. 4.Parkway landscaping on the following street(s)shall conform to tho kysufts of the respective Beautification Master flan: r� 0.Drainage and Flwd Control 1. The project(or portions thwwq is located within a Flood Hazard Zone;thorefore,flood �--J protections measures s.'V be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City/Ef4*Mr. 2.It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed frofn the project area. The developer's�, -oar shall prepare all f necessary reports,plans,and hydmk*,Jhydraulic calculations:..Anditionat Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR)shall be obtatvred from FEMA prior to JtW map approval or Issuance of building pe,mits,whichever occurs first.A Letter of Map Revision(LOMR)shall be Issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance,whichever occurs first. 3.A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City,��?tglneor prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs i.. I. All drainage facilities ehail be installed as required by tr; Cltt-Engineer. SC-2/9t 11or12 _T_ 36 PLANNING CONHISSION'RESOLUTION NO. DR FOR TT 1479B - HANDAH INTERNATIONAL June 26, 1991 Page 2 1. A final acoustical study shall be prepared ands submitted for review prior to issuance of building permits. The study shelf address the noise generated along Arrow Route and shall identify mitigation measures to Ibe incorporated into the final project design. 2e. A retaining wall shall"be pr<wided in order to eliminate he slope behind Units 8-10. Provide a efinimum `3-foot cLaar 'planter area between tle perimeter wall and the retaining wall. 3. The block well at the south end of the private yard for Units I and 13 shall.1pe 6 feet high. 4. The private open space for Units 7 and 8 shall be increased by moving the fencing cut to the front entry.. J 5. A connection to the, public sidewalk shall be . i' provided via ' a 4-foot walk east /3f ,t-he driveway_ 6. A revised cabana plan shall be provided for staff review and include the following changes: a. Place the spa equipment within the storage soon. b. Provide a' sink and lavatory in place of one shower. C. The shower need not be enclosed. 7. Property Haintenanee: Property owners are ;J responsible fot the continuous maintenance of all buildings, etruetures,' yards, landscaping, signs, parking areas, recreational :facilities, and other improvements in a manner which does not detract :from the ,appearance of the surrounding areas. In addition, Hultiple Family Residential Developments subject to the Development/Design Review process shall maintain site improvements in compliance with all applicable Conditions of Approval .imposed by the Planning Commission. � I 4 -31 - I fi A RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLI 'R ING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUt,AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT .NO. 14795, LOCATED AT 8626-44 ARROW ROUTE IN; THE"ifEDIDM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUV'-ORT THF-RMF - APN's 207-201-10, 11, AND 24. A. Recitals. (i) Handah International has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 14795 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in thin Resolution, the, subject Design Review request is referred to as "the'application." (ii) On the 26th day of June 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,.held a meeting to consider the application. (III) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resoluti-n. NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebj-found, determined,and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part R, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial avirence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on June 26, 1991, including written and oral staff reporter this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project is 'consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That th-t proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and (d) That the proposed design, together with the c<;,nditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based 'upon the findings and conclusions`set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby�pproves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached kip hereto and incorporated herein by this refe_ronce. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLOTION NO. DR FOR TT 14795 HANDAH INTERNRTIONAL June 26, 1991 == Page 3 B. Visitor Parl ing: Visitor parking shall be clearly de'tineated through groper signage to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Signage may include, but is not limited for individual) ,iabelin each parking stall with y g p g the words "Visitor Parking" on the pavement = surface, free-standing signs designating the stalls as visitor parking, and directory signs guiding visitors to the visitor parking area. 4. The Secretary to this Commission ehall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE' 1991. ' PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RXICHO CUCAMONGA Ci BY: Larry T. RcNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify �ihat the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote--to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: }r Ta2 -STf-4--ciS ero,en�o- r.Amplecon Dal:: This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the ar,plieant and all affected school districts have enterad into an agreement to privately accomro idate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the fins►map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved,written certification from the affected waterdistrict that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the Woposed project shall be submi-ned to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been Issued by the water districtwithin90dAyspnortofinal map approval in the case of subdivision or priorto Issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B.Site Dovelopment _ 1. The site shall be developed and maintrJned in accordance with the approved plans which J_J_ include site plans,architectural elevatiins,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division.the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations,and Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all _/_/ Conditior;s of Approval shall be completed to IN satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facility shall riot commeme until suchtimeas all Undoringuili ingCodea d State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy,plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The bull&j shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevaticf Incorporating ag Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of buiMi.,ig permits. 5. All site,grading,landscape,irrigation,and street Impm ,--entplansshallbecoordi,Mtmdtor —J--/ consistency prior to issuance of any permits(such as grade tg tree removal,encroachment, building etc.),or prior to final map approval in the ease of a crtstom lot subdivision,or / approved use has commenced,whichever comes Hirst. v 6. Approval of this request shall riot waive compf3anc a with all stems of the Development _/_! Code,all other applicable City Ordinances,and applicable C-nnwnky Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permlt issue ;. '7. A detailed on-site*Ming plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and --/—/ Sheriff's Departn*nt(989-6611)prior to the issuance of building permb. Such plan shall indicate style.Muminatton,location.h0ght,and method of shlelding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. I 8. If no cOntrafLred trash receptaces are provided,all tra.lh pick-sip shall be for Individual units wtth all receptacles shielded from public view. V 9. Trash receptacle(s)am required arid"mast City ftt ndar�fe. The final design,l=tions, and the number of trash receptacles shill ba s A*Mto My Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 10.All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as imnsfornmrs,AC condensers,etc.,shall _I—!_ be located out of public view and adequately screened ritrough the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, terming,and/or'la d'scaping to the satisfaction of the Cf; Planner. ,C-2/91 2of12 Cow out EP T PST° OF COMMUNITY ® V 1.OP ENT tiTANDA PROJECT#: SUBJECT: i APPLICANT: . 'n-(—�n ier!'1si'} ^✓u,Q �Lt��. LOCATION: Thnse items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DPJISION, (714)91i le6j, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time imtts 7 SiautLts 1. Approval shall expire,unless extended bythe Plarming Commissijs.,±:;,gilding permits are —1—.1 riotissued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval 2. Development/Design Review shallbk approved prruc I 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No._ Is grarded StMerx to the approval of _/_/— 4. The developershallcommence,participate In.andconsummateorcause to be commenced, Jam_ participated in,or consummated,a Mello.-Roos Community Faallues D%I t(CFD)for the Rancho Cucamonga Fiat Protection District to finance constimclion andfor maintenance of a fire station to serr 'he deveiopm4tt. The station shall be located,designed,and built to all specifications of i.;e Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection DlstrlM and shall became the Distlfcrs property upon oont eftn. The equipment shah be selected by the District in accordance with its tnaede. In any buildirgf of a statics,tha developer shall com*with all applicable lairs and regulations.The CFO shay be formed by ti*District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map ovsuts. t x s. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits,whichever comes 1— }' first,the applicant shall consent to, or:participate In,the establishmerd of a Mei3o-Roos Community cacilities District for the constntcli-)n and maintenance of rMessary school t. facilities. However if any sd=l district has omvlouslyeslaNISW such a Community Facilities District,the applleaM shall, in the saemative,consent to the annexation of the ° project site into the terrltor;of such existing Distft prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits.whichever comes Ilrst.Further,it the affocted school i district has not formed a Mello-Roos Commue icirdics District within twelve morgt,s from the date of approval of the project and prior tc a recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project:this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC-2/91 1 of 12 - / P-1 N- co cover 3. Standard patio v p plans for use by the Home-owners,Association shall be submitted for complenon o,«:,_jam_ City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. ✓ 4. All roof appurtenances,including airconditioners and other roo`.-nounted equipment and/or projectiors,shall bes ieldedfromviewandthesoundb`jtferedimmadjacentpropertiesand streeta as requires'`-y the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrd,ted with the building design 6*4 constructed`i the satisfaction of the City Planner. ., Details shall be included in building plans. f 0. Parking and Vehicular Access(indicate details on`~siidlog plans) II II —1, All parklig;ot larx'scape Islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _J--J— cOnfair,a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall(including curb). of 2. Taxtured pedestrian patlw.':, a and textured pavement across circulation aisles shalt be —��— provided thwighout the duvelopmentto connect drrellingsuunits,i!dings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses: 3. saa parking spac•,)s shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, _J—/— entrances,and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be providud with garage door oper.,ers h deiveways are teen than 18 feet In J--J— ' depth from back of sidewalk V S. The Covenant:,Conditions and Restrictions shall restri—ttho storage ofrecreationalvehklec on this site unless they are the principal sotirce of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on int4ror cimilation aisle-other than in casignated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for arm-securitygatos shall be rubmtifted for the City Planner, City ErRyneer,and J_I Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection`,?6-Ifs. reviaw and approval pdorto Issuance ofbuildhg i permits. E. landscaping for publicly maintained la areas,rater to Soctr4rr t�.) ✓ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan,Including slope planting and model i ms landscap- ing in the case of residential development. strait be prepmn by a licensed landscape archifetxsnd subrnitteafor City Planner rdviewand approval pdorto the issuance of bui(ding permits or prior final map approval In case of a custom Id subdlvislon. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in piece shall be protected w lb acons4luction baffler J_,.J— in acoordancewfthftMuniclpal Code Section 19.08.110,acidsdnod,Alonthegra drigplans. The location of tftose fre is to bs preserved In place and new to at,,—*:-,r!Mnspianted trees shall be shown onthn detW;6dlandscape plans.-The appAcard shallfoirow all of the arborisrs recot:smsndatorts a#Jatft preservation,transplantinp and trimming methods. 2. Aminimumot IPS" trees pergmss acre,comprised ofMe following sizes,shall beprovided _J—/— within the project:_ _% 48-€ h box or laiger,1Z—%-98-Inch box r r Larger,20 1 %-2t inch box or 16Mer, •16-gallon,and % 5 gatlorr. 4. k nrinimurn of %of trees planted within the prop shall be specimen size trees 244nch box or lager. _S. Wdhin parking tots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 13-gallon tree for every three _/--J— perkirig stalls.,5uf",;lent to shade SO*/*of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. sc s/st 4ort2 �_yy ��•TT�y-•�c�1 Qmtyletion Damp 11.Street games shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with / he adopter.,Street Naming Policy ;prior to approval of the final map. I/ 12.All buikliny numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. _13.A detailed plan indicating trail widths,maximum slopes,physical conditiona,fencing,and weed control,in accordance with City Master Trail drawings,shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approvaland recordationof the Final Tract Map andpiior to approval of street€mprovemsnt and grading plans.Oevabpershall upgrade and construct all trails,including fencing and drainage devices,in conprn,dion with stmet improvemer:.s. 14.The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions(CC&Rs)shall note,prohibit the keeping of enuine J J animalswherezoning requirements for the keening gf saidanim2,is have been met,individ.-N fotownersinsubdivisions shall havetheoptionofkcipingsaidan naiswrthoutthenecesshy j ,)f appealing to boards of directors or homeowners'associations for amendments to It a CC&Rs. V/" 15.The Covenants,Conditions,and Resit-Aicns(CC&Rs) and Articles of incorporation o!the Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of IN Planning and Engineering Div sions and the City Attorney.They shall be recordedconcursantiy with the final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A recorded r, ,pyshall be provided to the City Engine.=. ✓ 16.Allparkways,open areas,and landscap;rigshall bepermaientlymaintained bytheproperty --J_/ owner,homeowners'association,or other means acceptaWo to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner anu City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building per,niits. 17.Solar access easements shall be dedl=acl for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or unts for use of a solar energy system.The easements maybe contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded coiocurrently with the record:rtian of the final mzp or €Ssuance of permits,whichever comes first.The easements shay,pmhbk the casting of shadows by vegetation,structures,fixtures or arty other cbject,except for utilitywires and similar objects,pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.0610-G-2. 18.The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be dovebped and _- J mainlatned in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Perrnk No. Any further modifications to the site including,but not limited to,exterior afferations and/or interior atteratbns which affecttheexteriorofthe€uildingsor structures,removal oflandmark trees,demolition,relocation,reoonstnxxicncal buildings or structures.r.changes to the site, shah require a modification to they Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design _ 1. An afternati a energy system Is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for i;aating any swa*arning pool er spa,unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to beat equivalent capacity and off kirtio rcy.All sWan irgpoolsinstalled atthe time of initial develejunent strati be supptementi 1 with solar haoting Wails shalt be inclOod in the building plans and shalt be submitted for City Planner review and approi al prior to the issuances of building permits. s 2. :e"i;e,nliirigs shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treat"lent,detailing and irr•reased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner { review and approval prior to issuance of trsilding permits. SC•2/fit :a of 12 � �aZ T to F.Signs Com¢leum o,w- _tf 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and notapartof this approval. _/_ Any signs propc,'sed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall requi,s separate application and approval by the Planning Division priorto installation of any signs, 2.A U niform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Plann3r reviewand approval prior to issuance of building permits, i/ 3. Directory monument sign(s)shall be provided for apartment,condominium,or townhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate eaplicatlon and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.`Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice r i the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposk on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospsctive buyer written notice of the City Adopted J---J Special Studies Zone for the iced Hill Fault,in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospeclw buyer wnttten notice of the Foothill Freeway project In a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. ✓ 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Plainer review and approval prior to the _/_/ issuance of building pernhs. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation tobelow45CNEL,the building materials uW constnuclon techniques provided, and it appropriate,verify the adMiacy of the mhkW on measures.The building plans wilt be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H.Otrrer AgencEas t. Emergency secondary access shall be provided inaccorlancewith Rancho Cucamonga Fire —y—/— Protection District Standards. 2. i s nergen yac-Assshallbeprovided,maintenancefreeandclear,a minimum of26 feet wide at all times daring oonsbWion in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga'Fire Protection District requirem..rns. 3. Prior to issuance of bulk-ft pemtlts far conWstitrle oonstruction, evidence shall be —/_J_ submitted to the Ranch*Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply ,., fire protettIon is available,pending completion of required fire protection system. $ _✓ _4. The applicant shall contact the U.S.Postai aervioe to determine the appropriate type and fn. location of mailboxes.Mutl•family res oerrdal deVelopmerdsshall prsvide a solid overhead stWure for mail boxes with adequate ll Ing.The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead Miucture shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits. S. For projects using septic tank facilities,written certificationof arxeptability,including all �—Aillik supportive information,shall be c ained from the San 3emardirao County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Psrmils,and prior to issuance of building permits. i SC-2/91 6oft2 —SL� bit 1"T'tLA T'�2,01m NO, 6. Trees shall be pia;+ted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one Qmpfct cm Dam: tree per 30 linear feet of building. __J----J= �7. All private slope banks S fester less in vertical height and of5,1 orgreaterslope,but less than 2:1 slope,shalt be, at minimum,irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this swIon she!''-elude a permanent Irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. All private in excess of 5 feet,but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 21orgreater �J slope shall be landscaped and irrigated torerosion control and to soften their appearance as follows:one t 5-gallon or largersize tree per each 150 sq.ft.of slope area,1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq.ft,of slope area,and appropriate ground cover.to addition,slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq.ft.of slope area.Trees and shiubr shall be planted In staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane.Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy, 9. For sirigla family residential development,all slope planting and irrigation.:.�attbe continu- ously maintained in a healthy and thriving corxfitton by the deve"runill each Individual unit is sold and occuoled by the buyer.Priorto releasing accupaneyforthose units,an Inspection shalt be conducted by the Planning Division to detennine that they are in satisfactory condition. V 10.For mufti-family residential af- non-residential development,property owners are respon- sible for the continual main&,a ve of all landscaped areas on-site,as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept tree from wsods and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning,fer;ifizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead,diseased, or decaying plant material.shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. Ilk—11.Front yard landsCa.09 shall be required per the DevelopmentC xle and/or J l! This roquiremant shall be in add,;::-!^the required street trees and sigm planting. y� 12.The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls,landsr ong,and sidewalks shall be included in the required larldroape plans and shall be subject to City Plc:.rAer review and approval and coordinated foroonsistency with;rry parkway,landwaplIng plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13.Special landscape features such as mounding.alluvial to,*,specimen size trees,meander- ing Wdew.4m(with ttprirordal change),and intensified lanch aping,Is required along 14.Landscaping end InVation systems required to be irtstalledwkhln the public rigid-ot-way on / the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously mairdafned by the developer. _ ✓ 15.All-walls shall beproV-hAwkhdeaorativetroahnent.It located inpuhiicmalntenanceareas, —Jr/ the des;..Shall be cx rrdinated with the Engineering Division. S.Tree maintenance crfbaria sha!l be developed and submitted for City Planner review and —/—/_ approval prior to issuance of buildirg permits. These criteria shalt encourage the natural l / growth chaiacterisiics of the selects d tree species. 17.Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the pdric:ples of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of t;*Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SL-.2/9l sort2 -y�� l71Z 1T '-1� rComplenm Date• 6. As a custom-lot subdivision,the following requirements shall be men: a.Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site AML drainage facilities necessary for tiewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto final reap approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b.Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto --J--1 or over adjacent parcels,are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building.permits. c.On-site drainage improvements,necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided —0—/ properties,are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving,or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety �-1-- Division for approval priorto issuance of building and grading permits.(This may be on an Incremental or composite basis.) e.All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover for eroaioncontrol upon completion of grading orsomeother aftemativemethodoferosioncontrol shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official.In addition a permanent Irrigation system shall be provided.'This requirement does not release the applicardIdeveloper from compliance with the siope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 I of the Development G xie. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE EidGINEERING CIViSION, (714)tea-::1f."2,FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L.Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all Interior public streets, -/.r/ community trails,public paseos,public landcape areas,street trees,and public drainage faclWas as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities(cross lot drainage,beat feel ler trails,etc.)shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following s-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centarlins): j y total feet on C2 " 2 total feet on total feet on total feet on - 3. An irrevocable offer ofdedisatlonfor_-foot wide roadway easement shall be made —1 for all private streets or ddvrs. V�4. tVon-vehlculsr a 3esS ztihall be dedi.ated to the City for the following streets: _J_ ✓ S. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring amass to all parcels by CC&Rs .a or by deeds and ahall be recorded cincurrenfly with the map or prior to the Issuance of building pemtits,wh<.a do m-ap is involved. S-2/9t Sof12 DtZ 'rY �y�q pmimt No., APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION,(7,1,4) 9.',9-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I.She Development 1. The applicant shall compiywi!h the latest adopted Uniform Building Code,Uniform Mechani- cal Code;Uniform Plumbing Code,National Electric Code,and all other applicable codas, ordinances,and regulations in effect at.the tiros cf issuance of relal'nve permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unft(s)or major addition — -J to existing und(s),the applicant shall pay developrri3nt fees at tha established rate.Suchfees may include,but are not limited to:ChySeautification Fee,Patio Fee„Drainage Fee,Systems Development Fee,Permit and Plan Checking Fees,and School Foes. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a n®vr conurarcial or Industrial development or � — addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate.Such tees ma;,t include,but are not Iimfted to Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee,School Fees,Permit and Plan Checking Fees. I/ 4. Street addresses shalt be provided by the Building Official,aftertract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J.Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Suildi:,Q Code for On, property line clearancesAQ considering use,area,and fire-resisCrvensss of exis UV buli fts. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with Correct building and zoning regulations for —/--1— the inlended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed,filled and/or capped to comply with the eJ�J UnWrm'Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site WNW are to be W.Wed and efltrwm on buildin plans submitted for Jam— Wilding permit application. K.Grading 1. Grading of the sub;act property shall be in wxordance with the Uniform Building Cade,City J—f-- Grading Stanclards, and accepted grading practises.The final grading plant shall be in substantial carri'ormanoe with the approved graft plan. 2. A soils report shad be prepared try a qualified engineer ficeltsed by the State of CalHornta to —J—J— perform such wont. 3. The devo�,.;front Is located within the soft erosion control boundaries;a Soil Disturbance __J—/— Permit is required.Please contact San Bernardino County DepartmentofAgricultur3at(714) 387-2111 for perrriL application.Documentation of such perms shall be submitted to)the City prior to the Issuance of rough grading perm*. 4. A geological ,port shall be prepared by a qual 0ed engineer or geologist and submitted at J-J— the time of ap tlication for grading plan chock. 1/ S. The I inal grading plans shall becornpleted and app(ovedpdarto Issuance o1building permits. SC.2/91 - 701712 T- y 7 712� • T-T emjjgqt NO., Comoletia, ,u: Notes: (a)Malian island includes landscaping.and irrigation or,meter.. (b)Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be detefmined during plan check. (c)If so marked,side- walk skail be curvilinear per STD.304. (d)If so Mrked,an in-lieu of construction fee shall 3e Provided �for �this ,item [e')J�w.,x'C, Q � h c t r�e,� c.rip i����.sa Aft 4 Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans including Qtreat trees and street lights,prepared by a mgis- Jam_ tered Civil Engineer,shall be submitted to and apprpved by the City Engineer.Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completlon of the public and/or private street improve- ments,prior to final map approval or the issuarze of building pe ri,whichever occurs first. b. Prior'i any work being performed in pubi',right-cf-way,fees shall be paid and a consh,.11on permit shall be obtained from the Cif;Engineers Office'In addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping,marking,traffic,-meet name signing,and Aercornect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signalconduhwithpullboxesshallbe installed on any now eonstrucWn,orreconstruction of major,secondary or collector streets which intersect with other wI*r,secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals.Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of fhe street at 3 feet outside of BOR,ECRor any other loWlons approved bytheCityEneineer. Notos JJ_ (1)Ail pull boxes shall be No.6 unless otherW se spe^.i'W by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-;nch galvanized steel with puhrepe. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four*mers of IMerseshions per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adwquatedetoursduringconstruchon.A street closure permit may be required.Acash deposit shall be provided to mover the cost of qrmft and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the corrAraction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not aria sidewalks.Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards,except for single few bt1= Ill. Handicap access ramp design shah be as spewed by the City Engineer. I. Street names shall be approved by the Chy Pura r pdorr to submittal for first plan check. S.Si.-aet improvement plans per C' Star►dsrdsforaU ' dy private greets she!bo provided for review and approval by ft City Engineer.. Prior to any work being perfonrt'on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and conutnrchon permts$halt be obtained from the City Engineer's Office In additlott to any ether permits Loquired. 6.Street tress,a minimum of 16�gallcn size or larger,shah be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Aft SC-2/91 10 of 12 r _S 4 O ArZ TT «-i­i-,,,5 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated I J __/or noted on the final map; ; 7. The final map shall clearly uslineate a 10-toot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: 9/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to proh:;Wt the constrilalon of(residential)buildings(or other structures)within those area;designated on the map as building restrktan areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the aa'jacent lot through the CC&R's �8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or del!neated on —1+/ the final map. +' 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way �J� shalt be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10.Additional street right of-way shall be dedic.led along Oghttum lanes,to provide a minimum of 7 feet metered from the face of curbs.If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane,a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11.The developer shall make a goodlafth effort to acquire the required off-site propertyintefests _/+1 necessary to construct'be raq,!ired public frrprovements,and If he/she s.twuld tall to do so, the developer shall,at least 120r days prior to submittal of the final map for approval,w,er into an agreement to com.ete the improvemlrnts pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquiresthe property Interests required fortheImprovements. Such agreement shall pmvidn for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by City to acquire the off-sitep,-oeril inters,.s required In connection with Me subdivision.Security for aportiOn of these costs shall be inth9 form of a cash deposit in the antountgiven to an apgs;sisal report obtained by the developer,at developer's cost.The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to comnwrrcometn of fhe appraisal. M Street tmprovs"frie 1. All public Improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,communay trills,paseos, landscaped areas,etc.)shown on the plaits and/or tentative main shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street Improvements shall include,but are not Milted to,curb and gutter,AC pavement,drive approaches,sidewalks,e-traet 6gttts,and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement,within a 40-foot wide dedcated right-cf-way shall be constructed for WI haN-section streets. Z. C01152W the following peftater street improvefrtents Including,but not limited to: ' STREErNAME CURB& A.C. M g STREET SI47= COML MED ' ourmtt I Pvmr WAM ,-M. UOFM RCS TRAIL tSLVM OTHER = _T l� t SC-2/9 t 9 or 12 �-A pmmn No., 4.A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within itsright-of-way. Completion Data S.Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any pipblic storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 6.,Public stone drain easements shall be graded to coney overflows in t1'9_event of a -�-� blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P.Utilities t/ 1.Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sc-nitary sewerage system,water, _1 _ gas,electric power,telephone,and cable TV(ail underground)in accordance with the Utility Standards.Easements shall be provided as required. 2.The deve!oper shall be responsible for the retocatior,.of existing"to hies as necussary. J_r_ 3.Water and sewer plants shall be designed and constn.T ad to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District(CCWD),RancimCucamoroga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Neagh Department of the County of San Bernardino.A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to Yule!m p app.,vat or tmame of psnmits, whichever oars first. Q.General Requirements and Approvals 1.The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall bi legally combined Into —J — one parcel prior to Issuance of building permits. 2.An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or —/ issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first,for:: AML 771':) 3.Prior to approval of tt>e final map a deposit shall be posted wKI,the city covering the me estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among Vie needy created parcels. 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine,Area Regional Mairdhie,Secondary RG&nal,and Master Plan J_J_, Drainage Fees shall be paid prior o final map approval or;oriorto bulkitng permit issuance 9 no kip is involved. _5.Permits shall be obtained from the folioerirtg agancles for work within their right-of-way: _J_.J 6.A signed consent and tvalver form to join ardor forM the Law EntoroatttaM Contmunky; J-.JJ Facilities District shalt be filed with the City Engineer ptzrto final map app nal or the issuance of building pera ts,whichever omrs fist.Formation oohs shag be boats by the Developer. 7. Prior to finalization o;any development phase,sutfident knproven zit carts shelf be coat- J—J_ plated beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary a=ss and drainage protection to the'satisfaction of the City Engineer.Phase boundaries shaft correspond to lot Ilnes shown on the approved tentative map. SC-2/9 t 12 of 12 --5727, PM1=SQ.. _7.Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed t; the C Co Plecon o"` :ado tedpolicy. y y Engineer for conformance v;th a. On collector or larger streets,lines of sight shall be plotted for all projact ii S.sections, —�—� including driveways.Walls,signs,and slopAs shall be located ouWde the linss:of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions withi,;the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their rnoticeability improved,usually by r/— 1 moving,.ie 2+/-closest street trees oneach side awayfromthe streetand placed in a street tree easement. B.A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: 9.all public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete pdorto the —�—J— issuance of building permits: N.Public I Intoaa areas 1.A separate set of lr;ndscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards —�—/ — shall be subm;:ted to the City Er-gineerforreview and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.The following landscape parkways, - medians,paseos,Easements, trails,or other areas are required to be annexed Into the Landscape Maintenance District: 2.A signed consent and waiver form to join andlorforrn the appropriate Landscape and!_ighting Districts shall be filed with the City Em lgeer priorto final map approval or fs�,,.rrca of building permits whichever occul-s first.FoffrW.4n costs shall be borne by the developer. 3.All required public landscaping and Irrigation system shall be conflnuouskf maintained by the Jam_ developer until accepted by the City. 4.Parkway landscaping an the following Wreet(s)shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Mastor Plan: 0.Dralnitge and Florid Control I 1. The project(or portions thereof)is kxatet3 w htdn a Flood Hazard Zone;theratcre,flood ---��— protection tneasrres,iW be provided as certlned by a registered Civil Engineer laid ' approved by the City Engiric.m. :.i3 shalt be the devs"jrs riMmnsibllity to hrve the current 4. Zc.fe i designation remzved front the project area. The d9velioWs engineer shall prepare all j necessM reports.plans,and hydm!C-gbhydrauIV4 catarlations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CL IAR)shall be obtained tmm FEMA prior fu final map approval or issuance of building paimtks,whichever o=frs ifrat.A Letter of Map Revision(LOMR)shall l; be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or U provementacceptan e,whichever occurs first. r 3.A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to finalJF map approval or the issuance of building pemtits,whichever occurs first. All drainage Iacilii:es shall be in,talied as required by the City Engineer. SC 2/91 tloCtB L-S/ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 2 B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Mixed u;s; Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4 - Regional Related: Conuf"Ircial and Community Commercial) South Water transmission fac"'ity, industrial plant and vacant;- Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 8 - Gene',l Industrial) East - Vacant and Single Family Residential; Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4 —Community Commercial) and how Residential (274 dwelling units per acre) West - Interstate 15 and vacant; Victoria Punned Community (Regional Rei&ted Commercial) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site Commercial and Industrial Park North - Commercial South - General Industrial East - Commercial, how Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Commercial _ D. Site Characteristics: The site contains several unique elements indicative of the Etiwanda area and the Route 66 Corridor during,the 1920s through the 1960s. The site was the host of-the Cuca=nga'Top Winery and contains the remains of the winery complex, with its grape crusher, cistern, loading deck, accessory buildings, Craftsman AOL home occupied,by the winery owners (the Guideras), and a small store used for selling wine. A second Craftsman-style residence is located to the east of the Cucamonga Top Winery complex and was owned by another wine-making family (the-DiCar]os) off the area. The eastern-most structure on ti:o site is an o�,d gas station which contained restaurant space as part:;of the zc:�Nice operation. The qas station has since been converted to a_ bodyshop. Also haracteristic of the Route 66 Corr.dov, approximately two-thirds of :he street frontage along Fcothill ,Boulevard containtt,a double row of Eucalyptus trees. The balance of the site ontaYns grape vineyards and is undeveloped.' E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided t, Price Club 111,325 1/220 506 821 Wal-Mart 155,584 ` 1/220 707 BOB (ultimate) Gas Station 3 5 restaurant 6,000 ", 1/100 60 60 6,000. 1/55 109 109 st Food 10,ITS f' 1./75 136 147 Mail 282,8504 1/220 1,286 1,291 2,'E107 3024111 nj n ii Si CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT r t DATE: June 26, 1991 To Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN' AMENDMENT 90-04_- THE WATTSONCOMPANY - A request to modify the iaedian break -location on Foothill Boulevard, to add a median break location on Foothill doulevard, and to change the land use designation from Light'Industrial to Regional Related Commercial for an area of approximate�y 26 acres within that Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 41, located on the east side of Interrstate 15, south of Foothill •$oulevard. These requests are in conjunction with the ae_v�,,lcpment of a i60 acre retail/commercial center located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between- i-15 and Etiwanda Avenue`= APN: 229-031-03 through 13, 15, 16, and 20. Staff recommends issuance of a rlcgative Declaration. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit '•" SO-37 and Tentative Parcel Map 13724. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CORDITICr-L USE PERMIT 90-37 - THE WATTSON COMPANY- A request for master plan approval of a *60 acre retail/commercial center containing approximatel~ 550,000 square feet of leasable space and a request for app oval of conceptual site plan and huilding elevations for the Price Club facility in the Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial designations of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea. g), located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Int,%rstate 15 and Etiwarda Avenue - AM: 22e-031-03 through 13, 15, 16, and 20. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related Files: Foothill Boulevard Specific. Plan Amendment 90-04 and Tentative Parcel:Map 13724. Associated with the project is Tree Remayal Permit 41.-24. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a coneept-zal Master Plan, and a specific: Site Plan and Building Eleva_iotL: for the Price Club satility, issuance of a ritigated Negative Declaration for Conditional .Use Permit 90-37, and recommendation of approval to the City Council for Environmental Assessment and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-04. ITEMS J 6 R PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPok" CUP 90-37 - THE' WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 4 circulation of the future Regiona, Related Commercial use on the north side of Foothill .BoulevarL. Based upon review of the information, the new location will be able to serve the future development. Letters have also baen sent to the existing property owners notifying them of the proposed change in location. Comments have been received from the church expressing_their agreement with than new location. 2. New Median Break: As ,ictrt of the devel apment of the site, the applicant is�;.�roposing a left-turn-only median break between the freeway off'-ramp and the w"n- signalized intersection for the project. Because of the unusual ccnfiguration and depth of the southwest portion of the sitr, th'a applicant feels thae the left-turn median break is nececnary to provide adequate circulation for the project. This issue was addressed in the traffic study prepared for the site and has met concurrence with the CCity's Traffic Engineer. Additionally, favorable comments have, been received frog Caltrans for the additional median break. 3. Changes in Zonina 1)etignakion: Under the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the sou;herh and southwestern portions of the site were designated Light Ildustrial° with the southwest portion of the site being considered. for a ltagirnal Pelated Commercial use through the submittal and approval of a mastnr plan. With the submittal of the master plan for the. retail/commerc.:al center, the applicant is now requestin7- :hat the zoning designation be changed consistent with their proposal. There is, however, a small area within the p, put site —'hat was not originally considered as a potential '(pgional RWl�..id Commercial use. The area in the apprcximate locatioi. of the Wal-Mart building is designated as Light Industrib ' With the Big Three Industries located to the south and the Metrenolitan Water District facility located immediatotly to the east, this area would remain an isolated Light Industria;, packet. In that the applicant has submitted a master plan shtwing a commercial use of the entire area, staff feels it is appropriate to consider a change in the. zoning fruit Light Industrial to Regional Related Commercial consistent with the balance of tha project. D. D'Isiah Review Co-umsitt0pe This project ties been the subject of five Planning Commission rrorkshops. The format of these workshops was set up to review spe,ific aspecra of the project. The first workshop focused on major site planning issues. The second workshop provided direction for the arcnf.eecture of the center and the Price Club facility. Th* third workshop considered revisions to the site plan fo_ the entire site and the xchitectural concept for the, in- line shops for thA eastern and western ends of the projects (excluding: the free-standing buildings). The fourth workshop centered on the conceptual site plan and builct_ng elevations for the Price Club and finally, the fifth Planning Commission wor'cshr,i considered the overall master plan for the site. vim PLANNING COM1'XJs1ON STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 3 II. ANALYSIS A. Master' Plan: The applicant is Proposing to develop a`f60 acre retail/commercial center consisting of approximately;521,Og0 square feet of retail spaco, 22,000 square feet of restaurant/,fast food use, and a service station. T%e centet'ds proposed to be,'"�.nchored by a Price Club and a Wal-Mart. IAt this preliminary stage, 'the far western portion of the site is planned foie four major tenants ranging in size from 17,500 square' feet to 22,000 square, feet, 20,000 sq uare feet of shop space for smaller users, Et 6,150 square foot retail pad, and a 121100 square foot restaurant;pad. The far eastern portion of the `site cc tins- a 50,000 square foot upermarket and three major tenants, tanging,in size fi-im 22.,000 to 26,000 square feet, and t37,350 square feet- of shop space. In addition, three retail pads, four drive-thru`pads, -and a service station are proposed along the.=''jothill Baklevard street frontage., The Master. Plan depicts basic building, parking, 'anC circulation. aisle locations within the'pro,jact• Specific "design for each building, or series of buildings {except price Club), wilLI be subject to separefe Development Review or Condii:ional Use PerTit applications (as required by the Foothill BoV.evard Specific Plan). Based or. a recent conversation with" the applicant, subntan*ial changes may occur to the site plan, especially the wester+ portion, based on the needs of particular tenants. These changes will be reviewed with the future appl%c a;ions, b+�t Within the context of, this Master Plan. B. Price Clubs The applicant has submitted Ps site plan and: building elevations for a 111,325 square foot Price Club fccility. 'the building is proposed as a free-standing structure on ;a 12.2 acre parcel, generally located in the central portion of the project. The northeast corner of the building will be devoted to the sale and installation of tires. The parking provided for the Price Club is just under one and one-half times the. Coale tequi.renent. Additional parking is based on the Price. Club's experience and needy of existing facilities in order tc accommodate the influx of customers especially-at peak times (Christmas). C., L.,othill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment: K,edian break location: With the development of the cur.;.er, the applicant Will ba constructing a signalized intersection midway between Etiwanda Avenue and the Interstate 15 Freeway. The location proposed, however, has been shifted approximately 220 feet to the east of the location shown 'within the Poo::ttlll Boulevard Specific Plan. This proposed location was selected, not only to proviA•± access to the subject site, but also tc lire up with the existing driveway for the church on the"ressh side of Foothill Boulevard. Additionally, P_, the a alicant_,tiaE prepared a conceptual master plan and traffic analysis to evaluate the PLANNING COMMISEIOa STAFF REPORT CUP, 90-37 THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 19SI .,qe 6 f. The compact parking spaces provided by the applicant were accep`.able for the following reasons: t,•, The compact parking within the Wal-M4Zt area was in ddition to those spaces requirad under the nevelopment Steindazd spaces have been provided to meet the code requirement for parking stalls. 2) Compact spaces provided: for the eastern portion of the site exceed current Code -standards, they iL a theL same width as standard stalls (9 feet) and are 1 foot longer than compact stalls (17 feet Versus 16 Seet). U73er the Development'Cede, a 1 foo.overhang is peraitt2d- fcr standard etalls'and the proposal would cUy result vn`'a 1 foct reduction of a standard stall. If, however, the applicant proposes.to alter or modify the design of the parking area in the eastern'lwrtion of she site, the standards Ln Glace at the time of the proposed revision must be complied,with. g. Pads along the 1-15 Corridor sh-uld be denigned to be sensi,hive to tLe visibility from t1in freeway. Buildings should not be oriented With their= backs to the freeway and sufficient, aschitecttrally dzdigr,.ed, roc.-mounted screening mil' should be provided. C. Historic Preservation Commission: As noted undez the Site I Charact,zl-Istics scetior of the staff report, the project location contains-the remains of a family owned and operated- winery and a fillix.g station characteristic of +Lhe 1920s th_roug2i';Ohe 1960s. The complex represents a h-storic period, style, and way of ? fi: which is Tiesoming more and mor,s rant. in the "City'. Becausa.of itn n"toria significance, she HiRtQric P'teservatiou Commissioa rsvie' I,,the site for possible .< 'Gal Lan'bark nesignation. -u'"consi.dering the s'_;�, the Historic Pre£arvation Commission fe2_t' that .. Local Lan&dar's Designation would not be appropriates This deci'.ion was based Lon the fact that the site has been significantly altered ant' destroyed to a point where recommending Lando=k Pesaignation ova owii., objection`waa not merited. The Historic '!�reserva( on Commission did, however, feel that the hist� of the --ea should be in some � Hxstore� £rc�zervaiion Commission way commemorated. As a result, ?� -3` recommended approval of the site 'as-;a,-ooiht"of i-2:terest to the City Council subject to a series of `ar sLYea. The City Council subsegr- IV appr oved the the following sit l.gations: 1. The project owner shall sponsor a City "appr_ )dal History Program of the pioneering/wiaf,-iakirg families u£ the s,lbject area. J l PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT /f CUP 90-37 - THE `7ATTSON COMPA`1Y June 26, 1991 Page 5 �t 1. Price Club:.,, Or-L 4 1,991, the Panning ion Lons_Iered the conceptual site plan and buiiding'e'_vations, f r the price Club facility. At that tined. the Commission recommended approval of, the pane, subject to the elimination of the Mile roof elements over the main entry and providing a flat roof design .consistent with that (::own for the 'tire center entry. The plans for the .Prxce Club have since been revived consistent with the Planning Commission's direction. 2• Master Plan: On. June 6, 1991, the Planning.commission reviewed the overall maste%� plat. f.r the projectq The Commission recommended approval of the,`project subject; tn, the following+ conditions - 1 a. The des.gn of Pad.8 W s nni: acceptable in that, sufficient stacking distancr was not provided .for the fast food restaurant. The plan shoulC be revised to pxovide a design' that isfeasible for development. b. The design ,f Majors 5-8 and Shop G in not acceptable. Variation should be irovid-d in the building footprints, iAOL elevation fenestration ana building heights with: future submittals 1 C. The Commission noted thdx provisions- other 'than the two fast food restaurants, were not made-,for restaurant users within thc: eastern portion of the sites. ;If the applicant is proposing additional restaurant users, adjustments will have to be made in; the,square 2ootage of the buildings to ensure, adequate parking 13 provided, as required by the Development � . Code, i d. Site amenities should be provided across the site to link the various elements of the prriject. A hierarchy of site anenitses should be provided;ito'physically, and visually link elements across the site. s primary emphasis of this hierarchy should be,along the north/south drive aisles. The *� exact elements- and extent of ,the -aa,aenities, should be reviewed by the Planning Commission. The hi,6rarchy might include such 'elements as .'building focal points, kiosks, trellises, sating areas/bencbes, colored/textured wal3'ways, signage, street furniiture, and landscapius. e. The applicant should sv-b_mit e:;chitectt^ral details and elements to be reviewed and approved by .the Planning Commission to establish an architectural vocabulary to re used a3 t',Q basis £or design of future buildings within the center. J }� -� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORC CUP 90-3' THE WATTSZ.t COMPANY June L6, 1991 Page 8 a. F00thik2 Boulevard will be improved with three through lanes on the "south sides of the street, a fully developed median, " and two through lanes on the northside of the street.: It. , Dual left--turn lanes will be provided at the main entry to the.project to accommodate turning movements into the Site and to provide for turning movements into the future project on ttza.north side of Foothill Boulevard. a. Dual left-turn lanes will be provided for eastbound traffic - on Foothill Boulevard turn^ng north onto Etiwanda Avenue. d. Dual left-turn lanes will be provided For traffic he north on Etli-nda Avenue and turning westbound an Foothill Boulev<.•td. e. eight-turn lanes will be provided. for each driveway along Foothill Boulevard and the northerly driveway or, Etiwanda Avenue. f. A left-turn-only median break will be provided at-the western-most driveway along FO0thil_1 Boulevard in. order" to ac,,ess the, far southwest corner of the project, 2. Tree Preservation.: This site contains many mature trees located in basically three areas. A number of mate a rees are located around the existing single-family residi.ices and winery complex. also,, a cluster of trees is Ira _red in the soutnwest portion of the site around what was once iae Big Bear Winery. p ,,tally, a double row of Eucalyptus trees occupies approximately two-thirds of the Foothill Boulevard fro­tta4e. Many of these trees are clase1fied as heritage, trees and as such, are s"bject to the Tree Preservation Ordinance. A Con?:ition of,Approval has r been included requiring the approval of a Tree Removal Permit prior to the issuanr., of grading permits. Z.. amorist's report shall be prepared is conjunction with the Tree Removal Permit To address the possibility of preservation and/or relocat-in of existing trees on site. 3. Culturai Resources: As noted in the Historic reservation Commission portion of the staff report, there are a`number of cult?-,ral resourcea on the site. The Historic Fceservatioa Commission took these issues into consideration in establishing the mitigation measures contained in their 'Resolution 91-01- (See Exhibit "F"). These mitigation measures have beon-included in the Resolution of Approval for the master plan. Therefore, although the project could have a significant,effect in these area„ staff found that there will,;not be a significant effect Jr.- this case because of the .aitigation measar�s which have been incorporated AOL into the prvIect design or included as C7nditions of Approval. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. 07 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RETORT CUP 90-37 THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26,`1991 Page 7 2. The existing structures shall be documented fully, according to NABS/HAER standards by an architect approved.by the City.. 3.. Project owners shall offer to donate the Guidera ane�%DiCarlo�'ll, b.)mes over a period_ of 180 days to persons demonstra.tin5� ' ownership of land within the City of Rancho. Cucamonga suitablp�L for such relocation. The project owners will pay for suchi.i relocation. 4. The applicant shall, incorporate the familial and architectural past of the area into commissioned public art integral to the architectural design of the project-. This art shell portray southern Etiwanda's wine-making past in a realistic style and the applicant will 'submit no less than three alternatives, in no less than three different artistic mediums, for the Historic Preservation Commission's re-view. , The final specifications for this architecturally integrated artwork shall be .approved by,the Planning Commission. 5. The applicant shall use personal names and those of associative qualities, such as winery names or wine labels, on the project site wherever • -)ssible• 6. No demolition 1)eratlts shall be issued for existing structures within the pr, 'act site until the issuance of building permits for any new st..ucture. 7. The applicant shall contribute.up to $100,000 to establish a fund for the reconstruction of a.2,000 square foot barn at the site of the City owned Chaffey-Garcia house, wherein local wine industry artifacts will be documented and displayed. Said funds shall be donated prior to the issuance of demolition permits. The design of said structure shall follow the design of the original Chaffe_v-Garcia barn and its execution shall be subject to review and approval of the Historic Preservation Commission, in the form ;if a Lanftark AI'.iration permit. F. Environmental Assessment: In completing the Initial Study, staff has identified that there are' several potential 'environmez.tal- impacts as a result of the project. These items include: 1. Traffic Because of the unusual configuration of the site and the type of users being considered, including two i00,n0o+ square foot users, a_ traffic study was prepared to address potential impacts from the site on surroundin!yproperties. This ` report addressed the trip generation, froiL the site at the various drivewa,F-access points to public streets. In additiont the report addressed the impacts of the project at 3nte."zections and provided designs for the ultimate design 'of the Intersections. As a result, the applicant will be providing tb.- following mitigations: i J� K- '1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 - THE WAT?SON_COMPANY. June 26, 1991 - Page l_ III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Conditional Use Permit application is, consistent with the General Plan; the Development Code, and the Foothill Uoulevard Sleci;fic Plan. The project wil,. not be detrimental to adjacent 7 properties or cause significant enviromaentaliAmpacts.. The proposed usas and site plan, together with the Conditions of Approval, are in complanca with the appllrable provisions of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Development Code, and pity standards. The Foothill Boulevard -Specific Plan Amendment will provide for the development of a comprehensively planned _urban community that is superior to the development ot'lerwise allowable under alternative regulations. The amendment will provide for development of the Specific Plan in a manner wh:,,ch is consistal.t,with the General Plan and with the related development ;and growth management policies of the City. The amendment will provide.,for the construction, improvement, and extension of transportation faci'?ities, public utilities, and public services required within the Specific Plan. Additiunally, the amendment will not be detrimental to the public health or safety or cause nuisances or i significant adverse environmental impacts. IV. _C(ARESPONDENCE: These items,have h=.en advertised as public hearinas in. the Inlan& Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, notices were sent to all property owners within the subarea of the Specific Plan, and the site was post<d. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the''Planning Commilisiort approve Conditional Use Permit 9b 37, issue a mitigated Negative Declaration, for the Conditional Use Permit, and recommend approval of Environmental Assess ent and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-04 to the City Council. Resfiec ly submitted, 1 Brad lar , Citr lanner. O BB.Sbi;sp Attachments: Ex:^ibit "A" - Site Utilization Plasr Exhibit "B" = Conceptual Site Flan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" Conceptual Grading Plan Ex;. bit "E" - Building Elevations Exhibit'"F" - 'City Council Resolution No. 91"059 Resolution recommending approval of:Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 92-44 Resolution of Approval for. Conditional Use Permit 90-37 I �l 11 ` 1 0� aNipl FJ. II Ii�k E , 5 ED 'LIE; Im n ' I n ;F/hsfSSY/1ff%� r f •Z 1 i 1 F X-11 �--�e-�-'' 41. r Iry V� _ I t �j i- AR _r4St� �Aryp � \S v1 f � to r u 1� Apm Aft C s' ITEM: � 92 CITY OF UC.AMONGA TITLE: � .�,• PLAN ICN77 § w. EXHIBIT: -3 SCA�.E J) K-/ I J06 �, `� YURR 8 YAJOR T YARN 8 Yy�Yk 5 T.IEM;_ Q7 3�7 ti OF CTCA'VIONGA PL NMM ION 'tTi t.E• t s v -� EXgII rr.6-F SCALE: J� (�- a-- 444fff � �1 � ------------ \ \a \\fir.\R 1_ e — --_� —AMk - .• = c 130VVd _ OF UCAIVIONGA PL 'Vlr�t ION s>1Er N E7 Hmrr$-4 SCALE z:x iext i,i i : 1 i '1 1 i xl 1 rii x,3 x 1 i �� �!' •��� � IF_1i2 1413 lip c ,iiii} ]sif i}{i �x i,•} 1 i3 xaii F 1z x.i'trii rxi ;x5 13, ftF �xiyi li }�� lF Fitir :13�i}g41.3 =;' lo �Ssr Pi* r � .e n� � 1> }pug hf:CP(1!'I('�•j ® p �wh t�r•fY1'n';n nK$ '� '��ti 5 c 9 . t a701-Q2 J 1N 91 .c, AGENDA � 2 0f 1 E:33UVd CITY OF F ,UCf MONG�i 1TEA/I: PLAN�MI.I.Nd-`- ION TITLE: N 109 ^� r Al --Z---��-- a - Ei"llz a (VY OF O G . G v ZTI'L,E . .� «Y.�Lti` 1V� T P...AI'S I13 I1T i �'. OHO e 1p va AMk It �} -----_-- ---Uo - - _ b — i ff I Ir rr..aeeo weed ! JA CITY of �� UCAMONGA rrE €�dt a PLAN P T ry., ION TITi.E• ..a ExHiBrr:D—J SCALE: n�uni� �rlllll� 1 zv"n_ et- for i• � � � I \� I o _ fp -k six � 2 x :1 C i4 u :a im its Tn lio !ic SW t�7S ,•1' ik �cnrs,�d a�rona+asaa uW, ,;, J..7�i71s/O aracrnt /Wl/7pe/O,y . C2, CITY OF UCAMONGA. . TIiEM: Cuff :�� PITI�i .` IONTTTI.E• L . v N • ' ' E rr:v:3 scALE: X-23 Ao ntj 2 ij Iy lit Z}— 41.T M1 Jx t �; s� a`- a { , OF UCAMONGA ITEM:- &&P_5D•17 Tr PI AN i?. , ION - ' EXHLBTT:.D -2 SCALE: 1<- ZZ - ' 1 F' i sr rn it 8U 0 Amok 0 .S K 25 t IT Fa Qp IL DE , LL 4 ,H� ``+ ��� ear t�� •r ..L ` 6! H "Ab I.V h� l ♦ , t.\ t '1 3 � F .j,+j�� rT S, 'r�{F' =+r- ��_.��.��,-!8�..'�yf. �,ip3'� �.. 11 •.�• �:'ice' yti` �`,9rt�(�c.,•.•� ' S9, -'c+-.t-.Fr+-y.}�.�\ 1. a �� r IM�� +e� Sys I.F— Pi; � � �R .�� L ,•. � •�R..t � ,g.�..a,�,�`+ O 9911.. •• �� ter'z yesolution No. 91-059 Page 2 Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest is an example of a type of building which Was once common but is now rare. Fact; The two houses remain as testaments to the Craftsman,,tyre as it was interpreted in the area during the 1920s. Such e)wples are increasingly rare. Estimated construction of the filling, station dates to the late 1910s. !Dft na 3: The Proposer' Point of Interest is omuected with a bminesL or use which was once common but is :tow rare. Fact: Wineries, large and modest, composed a thriving majority the Cucamonga/Etiwanda areas businessx atrl land uses in the a.a from 1915-1950.. Ta-ze once extensive agricultural enterprises ai`e rapidly disappearing from the landscape. Furthmmore, roadside filling stat ays/restaurants are now all but obsolete. B. Neighborhood ar CqcTaphic settim; Finding 1: The proposed Point of Iru:erest materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Fact: These buildings form a large part of the overall sense of place and past in the area., Finding 2: The twoposed PD.Y*- of Interest in its to ati mi represents an established and familiar visual future of the neighborhood, comet ity, or city.: Fact: Owned by pioneer families whoEe descexdants ,lave stayed in the community, the rsane, ;vinery, and falling station 9 ave long been an established aid viable elemeztt in the area. Firdiiur 2• 711e Properties are an the City°s hi- =ical inventory. Fact: The properties are listed thus. F1tt�'iTM �; The putties stand ou'% as haviq outstanding historical, exr-titectsal, cultural, or awthet a signifies. Fact: The area's d;snip ;cn as cau 3 by the widening of Foothill Boulevard, the const=ticn of Xnterstate 15, and the increasing obsolescence of agr1cu3tural uses in the region has redue significantly the oonteact of these SW=hm-as. Since the proposed Project calls cut for the demolition of all of the rem naing buildings and the developw OTressed initial objection to any retwtion or i Ac*; of the structures, the matter of overriding significance mast be determined. 7tws, this Point of Interest Resolution with mitigation reomwoexulaticos recoVL ze th- grey historical value of the area as a unit and not specific ctures:` J1 K 27 .F Alk FSOUMON NO. 31-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF aPMCHO CUCAPYJNGA, CALIFORNIA, APplwnm IiLsmac POINT OF INTEREST 91-01, THEREBY DFSIGNA NG THE CWANELLA, GUIDERA, AND DICARLO VINEYARD LANDS AND SnU)CIURES' --( LOCATED AT 12573, 12601, 12617, 12675, 12705, 12743, 12777, 12801, 12807, 72811, 12821, and 12881 FOME nZ BOUIEVARD AS AN HISTORIC POINT OF INrEREST WhMUAS, on December 6, 1990 and January 3, 1991, the Historic Preservation tanmissiOn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application. WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all input rer-arding said Point of Interest designation. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this:Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The application applies to approximately 62 acres cif land, basically a rectangular cmfiguration, located along the south side of Foothill Boulevard east of Interstate 15 and wrest of Etitanda Avenue, APN: 229-031-03 through 13, SECi.'ION The nroposed Point of 'Interest meets the following criteria established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga-Municipal Code. i A. Historical and Cultural 5ignificarem: Findxm is The proposed point of Interest IS particularly represen- tative of a historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fad: TIM DiCarlo, Sc hi ro, Campanella, Enena, Colu rbaro, and QUdera families forged a commmity based on shared cultural back- ground, faith, and way of existence. These women, men, and children pioneered the growing of grapes and the making and selling of wine in the eastvcn 0Ma=nga,soutN!rn Etiwmda region in the 3.920's and 19301z. Tha hones and winery buildings stand as remindws of the thriving family-based viniculture once So prevalent in this area. The Orchaii/Meier filling station is linked historically with the small retail wineries and homes it lies text to thrash the most Popular thamIgMare of he time Route 66. Mle rise of automobile travel gave way to the parallel development of roadside diners, gas stations, and repair shops- At one tiMS, this Structure filled all Of these needs for travelers as well as those of the growl.ng t cxRaanity of Etiwanda. d Resolution No. 91-059 Page 4 I AMh 7) the project owner shall contribute up to $100,000.00 to establish a fund for the reconstruction of a 2,000 square foot barn at the site of the City-owned Chaffey/Garcia house wherein local wine in3ustry artifacts will be docunmited'and displayed. The said funds shall be donated prior to the issuance of demolition permits. The design of the said stn.cture shall follc,r the design of the original c affey/carcia b..xn and its execution shall be subject to the review and approval of the Historic Preservation Commission in the form of a Lmxkerk Alteration Permit. SErPION 4: Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Sectirr+s 1, 2 and 3 above, and received and reviewers by this Council. BE IT Pq7 MM RESOLVED that the City Council- of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves the forwarding of these mitigation reomnendations to the Planning Commission and the designation of the Caapanella, cuidera, and DiCarlo vineyard lands and structures as an Historic'Point of interest. PASSED, APPRWED, and ADOPTED this 20th clay of FeYn my, 1991. Kim: Alexander, 3uquet, Stout, Williams, Wright NOES: None Ask ABSENT. No3 `^ 5 L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Det�ra J.�Adamd✓ City tY Clerk I, DEMA J. AMM, cny CLEM of the City of Ranho Cucamonga, California, do hereby cmtify that th2' foregoing Resolution was dully passed, approved, and adapted by the City Cot=il of the City of PM1 ho Oucamorga, California, at a regular wing Of said City.Ccuncil held,cn the 20th day of Feh niaLy, 1991. Resolution No. 91-059 Page 3 Findira 5: Designation could, Ae'ap protect it. Facts: Regarulsss`of th- review process called into play by objection, the proposed Foothill Marketplace wool impact greatly an historic site with strong cultural and ethnic s3gniticance. Thus, Per CDQA, the project would have some,negative environmental effects. These effects can be ameliorated by f oxwaztling to the Planning C7=ni;5sion the mitigation recYW■end ticn5 outUned in SF tion 3 of this Resolution. SECTION 3: `This designation for Historic Point of Interest has been reviewed and owisidered in caTpl.i anoe with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and has been datezxined to be categorically exempt and further, the Council hereby reoarmends that the .following mitigation recarmen dations be included with the Planning Cc anirsLon's envit=mental review and determinations for the overall Foothill marketplace project: 1) The proje'„t adners shall spons;g a City-administered oral History Program of the pioneer main-making families of the subject area. 2) The existing structures shall be documarted fully atbording, to HAGS/HIM standards by an architect ag-roved by the City. 3) The project owners shall donate the Guidera and Dicarlo hares and pay for their relocatirn to persons demonstrating ownership of a parcel of land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and suitable for such a relocation. Muse'hams shall be available for such donation over a period of 180 days. Such parcels located in the historic canmumity of Wwanda will be given first preference. 4) The Project awns shall utilize personal n1aTes. and those of associative qualities., mx:h as winery names or wine labels, on the project site utenever possible. The developer shall lrcorpora}e the familial and agricultural past of the area into caumissioned poiblic art integral to the architectural design of the project. This artwork shall portray southern Etiwanda's wine-making past in a realistic style and the Project Mier will mAm t;no less than three alternatives in no less than three different artistic mediums fo rthe Historic Preservation CmmdwicnIs review. , The final specifications for this arcchitecturaly-integrated arh=k shall be approved by the Planning Commission. 6) No demolition permits shall be issued for existing structures within the Project site untill the issuances -of building oexmits for any new structures, ik Resolution No. 51-059 /( Page 5 Z--=tLid this 21st day of February, 1991 at Rancho" Cucatnnnga California. rJ Debra J. Aqfafm, City Clerk AdIk PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. FSPR 90-01 - CITY O,^ RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 26, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north is designated for Commercial uses and is improved with a mix of uses in"wluding a church, single-family residences, retail stores, and a converted winery. The property to the south is designated for Industrial uses and is developed with an'::jindustrial business, is being developed with a water treatment facility, and is vacant. The property to the east is designated for Commercial and Residential uses and is vacant and developed with single-family residences. The property to the west, opposite the Interstate 15 Freeway, is designated for Commercial uses and is vacant; and (c) This amendment wt,:l provide median locations necessary to provide adequate circulation to serve the site while maintaining adequate circulation for the yet underdeveloped parcels on the north side of Foothill Boulevard; and (d) This amendment will provide for a master planned commercial development as was provided for with the adoption of the original Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and (e) This amendment will change the zoning designation of an Industrial parcel not or&ginally considered part of a future, master planned, commercial development. This parcel would, however, become a landlocked property due to the existing development and developments under construction Adk to the south and east. The inclusion of this parcel in the master plan is in keeping with the intent of the Foothill Eoulevard Specific Plan and the General Plan to provide a comprehensively planned area. 3. Based upon the substantial evideriue presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the district that is superior to the development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and (b) That the amendment will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City; and (c) That the amendment will . provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development within the district.. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 ar_d, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLR'Y AMENDMEWT NO. 90-04, ;`. REQUESTING TO AMEND THE ?03THT_LL BOULEVARD>'':1kZCIFIC PLAN TC MODIFY THE MEDIAN BREAK LOCATION ON ` FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, TO ADD A MEDIAN BREAK LOCATION ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO REGIPIAL RELATED COMMERCIAL FOR SN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 26 ACRES WITHIN .THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ,SPECIFIC PLAN '(SUBAREA 4) LOU...TED ON THE ,F.'A£T SIDE OF ZWTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, I14 CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF 'A t60 ACRE RET.AIi,/COMMEF,DIAL CENTER LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWE20 INTERSTATE 15 AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 22S-031-03 THROUGH 13, 15, 16, AND Z._ A. Recitals. (i) The Wal-tson Company has initiated an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 90-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Pian Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On June 26, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the-application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presentedto this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 26, 1991, ,including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby ' specifically Minds as follows: ._, (a) Tha amendment pertains to a t60 acre parcel. of land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard ,Betwasn Interstate 15 Ltd Etiwanca Avenue, with a street frontage of f2,175 feet along Foothill P=ulevard'and t600 feet along- Etiwanda Avenue. The site is presently cesignated ,for Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial uses and'is developed with single-family residences, a winery complex, and a converted gas station; and `r ti PLANNING C0:44ISSION •RESOLUTION NO. FSPA 90-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0140A June.26, 1991 Page 3 S. Based upon-the findings and co ,• g conclusions set forth in parag,ophs Y, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: _ (a) Tlil, Planning i Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve a��d adopt Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Ameiidment No. 90704, as attached in Exhibit "A." (b) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the, Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council: 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to theti,\adoption'of this Resolution. I � APPRCPED AND ADOPTER THIS 26TH DAY OF JUKE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMtONGA BY• • Larry T. McNiel, Chairman i ATTEST: -- Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Comwis6i4 jf the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and; regularly introduced, pasoed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote=to-wlt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES COMMISSI ONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: =1 Q. l0c ° 9L O WU CD 1- 3 '`�•` a L ec _ a ,5 a r P 7a113 L6 x U3 n A -L1- ••'-_-L W a In � R Ic W r 1 ' Wa fl > e = $ O O Q�. to cc ri / _3 EXHIBIT A 2 r`�1 U p ! o a AIL 25 5 C.) - P,� i ` .a 14 o � K-3� EXHIBIT A-9,; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north is designated for Commercial uses and is improved with a mix of uses including a church, singlL-gamily residences, retail stores, and a converted winery. The property to the south is designated for Industrial use'. and is developed with an industrial business, is 'being developed with a water transmission facility, and is vacant. The property to the east is designated fcc Commercial and Residential uses and is vacant and developed with single-family residences. The property to the west, opposite the interstate 15 Freeway, is designated ,for Commercial uses and is vacant; and (c) The project will comply with all minimum standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (d) In conjunction with this application, the applicant has submitted a reauest to amend the land use designation within ,the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan from Light Industrial to Regional Related Commercial. Provisions were previously incorporated into the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to allow for such a chaaS6 through review and approval of a Master Plaa; and (e) The development of a f550,000-square foot retail/commercial. center is consistent with the Regional Related Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Commercial designation of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in; accord' with the Ceneral Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and th" purposes of the district in whict.; the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together w;.th the, conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties ou Zm cements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. Thit Cetamission hereby' finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental. Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative D,i,laration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in parat_.g a 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and _very condition set forth below and in the attached ,Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated'herein by this reference. f K -37 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING 03MHISSIOii OF THE!DITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING'CONDITIf,iAL US;E PERMIT 90-37, A REQUEST FOR MASTER PLAN APPROV.'! FOR A t60 ACRE RETAIL/COMMERCIAL CENTER CON_AINING APPROXIMATELY 550,000 SQUARE FEET OF LEASABLE SPACE AND A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR THE PRICE CLUB FACILITY' IN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OFTHE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 4), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN 'INTERSTATE 15 AND 'ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND ;MAKING FINDINGS, IN SUPPORT THEREOF - ,APN: SS 229-031-03 TH1=GH la, 15, 16, P:da; 20. A. Recitals. (i) The dattsou Company has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit i90-37 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the26th day of'June 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Ranclio Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public her-ring on the applicatior and concluded said hearing on that date, Auk (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is; hereby' found, determined, ,and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows." 1. This Commission hereby spec;lfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rec.-' .ale, Part A, of tkis Resolution are true and correct. :i 2. Based upon substantial evf;fence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public he.;jri,(g on June 26, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony,_ this ConLm"sion`hereby specifically finds as follows: (a,) The application appiies to a •.60 acre parcel of land located on the south aide of Foothill Bolilevard between 'Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue, 'with a street frontagepf t2,175 feet' along,Foothill--Boulevard and 1600 feet along Etiwanda Avenie. The site is presently designated for Regional Related Commercial and,JLight Industrial uses and is developed with single-family residences, a winery compl".y_ind a-converted gas station; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO CUP 90-37 FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 4 9) All future pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control Prior to occupancy; of any building. Details shall be,included with the landscape and irrigation plans. The plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 10) All street furniture, including benches, bike racks, potted plants, light bollards and standards, drinking fountains trash receptacles, etc. shall. be P . , reviewed I and approved by the Planning 07+mmission prior to the issuance of any building,permits for the center. 11) Graffiti shall be removed with'r 72 hours:. 12) The ontire site shall .be kept free from trash and debris at all times and, in no event, shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 13) There shall be provision for security patrol of the shopping center at least three times per evening, sevsn days per week, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. by a licensed private patrol. 14) Bus shelters on Etiwanda Avenue and on Foothill Boulevard shall be installed with street_improvements and shall be architecturally compatible to the center. Final location and design of the bus shelters shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of any building permits for the center. 15) uq transformers, service 'ar_eas, or trash enclosures located near the 'setbacks of E1`tiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall,- only be.':ionsidered when they are screened by using;d combination of walls, berms, and landecapinq. 16) The freeway right-of-way adjace-at to the project shall be landscaped, or an in-lieu fee paid, in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution. No. 87-185. The landscape plans shall be approved by the City Planner or. the in-lieu fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of) any building permits for the center. 17) Specimen-eize,,trees (36-inch box or larger) shall be provided at key locations including, but not limited to, entries, plazas, on-site intersections, etc. The PLANNING COMMISSION' F8SOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 • FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE Sune 26, 1991 Page 3 Planning"bivision 1) Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is for the conceptual master plan for the-entire shopping center and the detailed site plan and elevations for Price Club. All other buildings and/or pads will require the appro,ral of a separate- Development Review or Conditional Use. Permit application, as required by , the Foothill 3o:zlevard Specific Plan. t 2) Approval of Conditional t Uoa Permit_ 90-37 is contingent upon approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-04 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 13724. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, a Tree Removal Permit application shall be, reviewed and approved by the Citiy Planner. n arborist's report shall be prepared to address. the posuible preservation and/or relocation of heritage _ trees on-site. The arborist shall be selected by the City and paid for by the developer; 4) No occupancy shall be permitted for any user until all st•:eet improvements have been installed to the satise,action of the City. 5) is phasing is proposed, the phasing plan -shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning :Cop,mission prior to the issurnce of any building permits fo.: the ' center. 6) No permanent outdoor storage of shopping carts shall be permitted, unless otherwise cpproved by the Planning Commission., 7) Parking lots along Foothill: and,.Etiwanda shall be fully screened from the street through the use of t3 foot berms, low screen walls, and/or shrub planting. The final details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 8) A Uniform Sign Program shall be prepared for the center and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. The program shall consist of all on-mite signage including, brt not limited to, monument signs, directional signs, and wall signs. 1� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 6 22) Prior to the issuance of any permits or acceptance of any future application, the applicant shall submit architectural plans, colors, and details to further define the architectural vocabulary expected for the center. The information (including the final colors and verification of all roof-mounted equipment for Price Clvb) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commisi�3.on. I i 23) A plan of development for on-oite amenities shall be established to "tie" the site together throb},; ' pedPstrian-scale linkages. Elements to consider include, but are not limited to hardscape treatment 1 and ',?atterns, landscaping, trellises, kicsku, street furniture,-seating area, plazas, building features, signane, etc. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building'permits'for the center. 24) The final 'design of the retaining wall along the freeway off-ramp shalL be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of any building permits for the center. ' 25 Pursuant to ;' provisions of California;' Resourcee Code Section 210a9(b), this application shall not be _ operative, vested, or final, 'nor will building permits be 'issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of -_n tion (NOD) regarding the . associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California' Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shr..,,l provide the Planning Department with a stamped and'.;onformsd copy of the NOD together with a receipt show.,mg that all fees have been paid. \, In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisiohs of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelinas promulgated thereunder, except for payment of a.?y required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null, . and void. Aft PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MAWMT PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 5 ! type and location of the trees shall be shown on the final landscape plans which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to,the issuance of any bu!tding permits for the center. 18) Any outdoor vending machines.shall be architecturally integrated into the design of the buildings. The vending machines shall not extend out into the pedestrian walkways. A recycling I',permit application shall be submitted for any recycling,,center and shall be reviewed and approved by the City'`alanner prior to the issuance of any building permit %ir;the center. 19) Traah enclosures shall be designed iti'incorporate the following design features to the sl,#S,faction of the City Planner: a. Architecturally integrated into tha des_gn of the shopping center. b. Separate pedestrian access, including a self- closing door, that does not require opening of the main doors. - c. Roll-up doors. d. Trash Sins with counter-weighted lids. e. Architecturally integrated overhead trellis. ` f. Chain link screen on top of the enclosure to prevent trash from blowing out of the f enclosure. The chain link shall be hidden from view. 20) The applicant shall make a good-faith ef4_�_''to obtain permission to grade onto adjacent properties in order to eliminate the need for; retaining wa?.ls along the south property line. Such evidence shall be presented to the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. 22) If permission to grade off-3ite cannot be obtained, landscape plans for Metropolitan Water District shall be reviewed to determine the practicality of installing wrought iron. Fencing on top of the retaining wall in order to minimize the impact of the solid viall. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. K _Y0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-371 FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 8 Alftk 6) 'W'd demolition permits shall be issued for existing structures within the project site until the issuance of building penaits for any new structure 7) The applicant shall contribute up to $100,ODO to establish a fund for the reconstructiot of a 2,000 square foot barn at the site of the,City owned Chaffey^Garcia house, wherein local wine industry ;`- artifact% will be documented and displayed. Said ) funds shall be donated prior to the ;.ssuance of demolition ��ermiCs. The design of said' structure shall follow the design of .the original Chaffey- Garcia barn and its execution shall be subject to review and approval of the Historic Preservation Commissi i--_ehe fora of a LaidmarY, Alteration Permit. Engineering Division 1) Existing Overhead Utilities a. Foothill Boulevard - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding,of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication Adh and electrical)-on the opposite side of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half of the City' adopted unit'amount times the length from the center of Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly terminus. b. Etiwanda Avenua -.An in-lieu fez as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical except for the 66 kv electrical) on the opposite -side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Foothill - Boulevard to the south project boundary., c. Overhead utility service lines which cross Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall, be removed concurrently with the removal` of the existing, houses on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, 2) Foothill Boulevard shall be con��tructed from Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly project boundary as follows. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTI6N NO. CUP 90-37 FOOTHILL MAR?,T,�PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 7 Historic Preservation 1) The applicant shall, sponsor a City approved Oral :History Program of -the pioneer wine-making families of the subject area. The program shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 2) The existing structures shall be documented fully according to HAHS/HAER standards by an architect approved by the City and paid for by the applicant. The documents shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuar,e of permits for either demolition or relocation. 3) The applicant shall offer to donate the Guidera and DCarlo homes to persons demonstrating ownership of a parcel within the City of Rancho Cucamonga suitable for such relocation. These homes shall be available for such donation over a period of 280 days and the applicant shall pay for relocation costs. Advertisements shall be placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and The Sun newspapers, at a minimum, every weekend during the 180-day period. The size of the advertisement shall be one-eighth page and the content shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the submittal to the newspapers. Parcels located in the historic community ofEtiwanda will be given first preference. All documentation demonstrating compliance with this condition shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to the issuance of demolition permits. 4) The applicant shall incorporate the familial and architectural past of the area into commissioned public art integral to the architectural design of the project. This artwork shall poi*tray southern Etiwanda's wine-making past in a realistic style and the applicant will aubm t no less than, three alternatives, in no less than three different artistic 'mediums, for the Historic Preservation -Commission's revieq The final specifications for this architecturally integrated artwork shall be approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 5) The dpplicant shall' use personal names and those of associative qualities, such as winery names or`wine labels, on the project site wherever possible and appropriate with the approval of the center's Uniform Sign Program. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE J June 26, 1991 Page 10 7) Provide double '(opposite direction) left turn lanes within Etiwanda Avenue to serve the project entrances, Chestnut Avenue, and a future driveway on the east sida of Etiwanda Avenue, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer 8) Provide a curb-adjacent sidewalk, for the busbay on Foothill Boulevard. Also, the curb-adjacent sidewalk for the busbay cn;Etiwanda Avenue shall be minimized. 9) Provide a meandering sidewalk in accordance. with City Standard No. 304 on Etiwanda Avenue. The sidewalk on Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall meet all driveways at the zero face of the curb return except for the main entrance on Foothill Boulevard and an otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 10) A final traffic study showing calculations for -Lhe determination of the langth of`.�11 left turn lanes on` Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue based on post 2010 traffic conditir>ns shall be eobmitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final, map approval or issuance of building permita,'-whichever occurs first. All street facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.. 11) A lot line adjustment shah.: be recorded to i,,icorporate the northerly portion of APN 229-021-59 and the westerly portion of APN 229-031-16 into this project A-or to the issuance of building permits. 12) All of the project driveways and the f,nternal drive aisles to be used by trucks shall be designed to accommodate the Caltrans standard 50-foot radius turn template unless justification is provided for a lesser design radius as approved by the City Engineers - 13) The property necessary for the proposed freeway off- ramp at the northwest corner of the site shall br reserved. It appears that Caltrans will not allow the retaining wall shown on the plans; therefore, additional land to what is shown on the plans will need to be reserved as approved by Caltrans and the City Engineer. Also, the project plane will need to be modified accordingly. 14) Drainage fees for the development shall be paid as j follows: r �` _y� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June. 26, 1991 Page 9 AML a. Full width on the south side including the median curb. _ b. The ultimate backbone system on the north, side consisting of two, travel., lanes (27-foot wide pavement) and the media curb or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer, c. Landscape the median island. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of one-half width of landscaping fronting his project from future development of acdoso- the-street properties. d. Construct a 6omplete intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard with transitions to meet existing pavement east on Foothill _�,oulevard and north on Etiwanda Avenue. Also t" traffic signals shall be modified at the internection_of Etiwanda Av;,,rq�rj and Foothill Boulevard. Both items shall be-as approved by the City Engineer. e. The developer shall be eligible for fee credits against and reimbursement from the Transportation Deveiopnent Fee for the portion of improvements determi4ed by the City Engineer to be of supplemental size, length, or capacity over that needed or :the impact of this development in conformance with Ordinance Ho. 455. 3) The- traffic signal shall be installed at the main entrance on Foothill Boulevard at the developerlu expennea. 4) The median island within Foothill Boulevard shall be moved southerly so that it is symmetrical ab,)ut the centerline or as otherwise approved_by the City Engineer. 5) The Foothill Boulevard busbay shall be moved, westerly to be as close as poesib).a to the median opening to reduco potential jaywalking across Foothi),J Boulevard. 6) Etiwanda Avenue shall be widened on both sides as necessary to accommodate the street improvements necessary to mitigate the traffic impacts of the pxreject as required by the City Engineer. UZI i [f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTTIOU NO. CUP 90.,,!37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE ` June 26, 1991 ?age 12 -22) Easements for public storm,drains within the site shall be provided: 23) The developer and the City. shall enter into an agreement tLat tra,:"fers maintenance responsibilities from the City to lthe developer fora, the drainage facilities serving Foothill Boulevard at such time that alternate facilities for disposing of the Foothill Boulevard drainage is provided and approved , by the City"Attorney and City Engineer. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shad certify to the adoption Of this ' Resolution. APPROVED .VM ,ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING'•. COM41SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTESTz • Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, secretary of the Planning Commission a -,the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the -foregoing Resolution was duly,,and. :regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning C:ammission'of the, City of Ranc�io Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMN7-PIONERS. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:: COMMISSIONERS: ?' 1 v-' PANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N.S.,- CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 11 a. Etiwanda/San Sevaine area fees for the portion of the site within that area boundary (easterly 6t acrss). b. General City area fees for the portion of this site outsidtr of the'Etiwanda/San Sevaine area. a. A payment equivalent to the Day Creek Mello Roos Assessment of $4,675 per Acre for the portion of the site currently outside the bal,Creek Channel Mello Roos District bounlary. 15) Approval shall be obtained from the Municipal Water District and San Bernardino County Flood Control District"to accep! the extutir, flows from north of Foothill Boulevard to the facility along Arr:w Highway and Day creek Channel. If' such approvals cannot be obtained, alternate facilities such as those required by the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Policy (Area 9) shall be provided as approved by the City Engineer..' 16) 7:ntersectiun drains shall be provided across Foothill Boulevard' at Etiwanda Avenue sized to convey as muck flow as feasible as approved by the City Engineer. 17) Drainage -facilities shall be extended to the north side of Foothill Boulevard along the project frontage to collect as much flow :as feasible as approved by the City Engineer. 18) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance for disposal of the dra-nags entering tha property from the adjacent Caltrans area to the west. 19) The small portion of the sou::hoast corner of the property shall be regraded to drain to the Municipal Water District facility. 20) Construct storm drain facilitie3 to serve C.e site generally as shown on the plans and as described in the project°s preliminary drainage 'report subject to final plan check and a final drainage report as approved by the City Engineer. 21) Easements for and permission to construct storm drain facilities on and convey flow® to off--eite'prnperties shall be obtained and provided as,"approved 'by the City Engineer. - f `a r�,�Vie.:i.-u�9c•3j Comoleuon Datei This condition shall be waived it the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into anagreementtopri-' y accommodate any and all school 1� ;acts as a resuftof this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final mare w priorto Issw-we of building permits when no map is involved,written certification from the affected water iistrict that adequate sever r and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposer,project shall he submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days priortofinal map approval inthocaseof subdivision orpriortoissuance of permits in tho case of all other residential projects. B.Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include cite plans, architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Division,the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations,and Cw i[L �au�✓Aso' _Speci:;c Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being-zmmenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as 311 Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been compiled with. Prior to occupancy,clans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Buildi% Xi Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conclitier ns of Approval shall be _ /_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. _ V' 5. All she,grading,landscape,Irrigation,and street 1 mprovement plans shall be coordinated for Jam= consistency priorto issuance of any permits(such as grading,tree removal,encroachment, Iwfloi'd,etc.),or prior to map approval in the case of a custom lot subdiwAsian,cr approved use has commenced,wfthsveF comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development __J—/— Code,all other applicable City Ordinances,and applicable.;ommunity Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.' 7. A letalled on-site lighting plan shall be revieried and approved by the City Planner and _J_J Sheriff's Department(989-6011)prior to the issuance of building perrNts. Such plan shall Indicate style,illumination,location,height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacem properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided,all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s)am required and shall meet Citystandards The final design,locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prkw to issuance of building permits. 1 G.All ground-mounted utllily appurtenances such as transformers,AC condensers,etc.,shall be located out of public yr-w and adequately screenec4 through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, andtbr landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. ci SC.2/91 2of12 � � DEPARTMENT OF '79a-NONO OUCAMON04% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT '%sTANLJA LJL;UNU wNti RF% PROJECT#: U,✓ rV<+C Mir 4O-X7 SUBJECT: L �f�iGG �i1�2rF,4LCE APPLICANT: Tflr 11�1rt5GK' /y_QtiIN LOCATION: �Y 3` Y&/& �si � _ 75 <1Y0 Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. - APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714)9391.1ti61, FOR COMPLIA'CE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits Complaion rhk Ift vm 1. Approval shall expire,unless eMended by the Planning Commission,N building permits are —�—J— not issued orapproved use has not commenced within 24 months fromthe date of approval. 2. DevelopmenVDesign Review shall be approved prior to 3. Approval N` rntffiive Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of 4. The devek)pershall cammencr,,parilcoate In,and consummateorcause to be commenced, �—/— i participated in,or consummated,a Mello-Roos Community Facilities Distrim(CFD)for the Rancho Cucamonga Eire Protection DistrY.A to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The statiot,shall be located,designed,and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and shall become the District's property upon coinpietion.. The equipment sha,'I be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station,the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations.The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance ofbuilding permits, whichever conies first,the applicant shall consent to, or participate in,the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community facilities District for the constwion and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However,it any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District,the applicant shall, in the alternative,consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permils,whichever comes first.Further,if the affected school _w district has riot formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project,this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC-2i9t t or is /<^ P-1 N- PyP 1rG;3y Cumple�un Datr 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners'Association shall be submitted for City Planner and BuikiI,ig Official review andapproval priorto issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances,including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or `(_.J projections,shall be shielded from view and the sound Wit ered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturaily integrated with the building'design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access(indicate details on building plans) 1. All packing lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside d;.yd'nsionof61eet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the Parking stall,(including curb). 2. Texiured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation allies shall bo —�'--��— pmvidedthroughout the development to connect dwel5rips/units/buiklings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. Ail parking spac6s shall be double striped per Ckly standards and all driveway aisles, _J_J entrances,and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers If driveways are less than 19 feet in depth fr, m back of sidewalk. 5. 1 he Covenants,,Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of reveationat vehicles on this this sole unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer,and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protcction District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping(for publicly maintained landscgo areas,Marto Stactlon N.) 1. A detailed landscapeand iffigaWn plart,including slope planting and modal home landscap- ing in the case of residential clevek+,vnarrt, shalt be prepared by'a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner re-r awandapproval priorto the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the rase of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protectedwith aconstruction barrier inaccordancewith the Mlu&lpalC%o, Section 19.08.110,and so noted onthe grading plans. The locationof those trees to be preserved in place and new kxationsfartransplanled trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans.The applicant shall follow all of thearborlst's recommendations regarding preservation,transplanting and tfimminy methods. i 3. Aminimumot treespergross acre,comprised of the following sizes,shall bepmvided --J--/— vaithin the project: %-4s-inch box or larger, °/a-36-inch box or larger, %-24-inch box or larger, %-15-gallon,and %-5 gallon. 4. A minimum of %of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees- J 24•inch box or larger.Z5' 5. Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15�gallon tree for every three __j /— Aok parking stalls,sufficient to shade 50%of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC-2/91 4 of 12 P_ :>� f4gve7eJ7 Cu gleu-Dam- 11.Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Namin;,Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12,All building numbers and individual units shall ba identitiad in a clear and concise manner, JJ— including proper illumination. 13.A detailed plan indicating trail widths,maximumslopes,physical conditions,fencing,and "_JJ weed control,in accordance with City Master Trail drawings,shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading pianti.Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails,including fencing and drainage devices,in conjunction with street improvements. 14.The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions(CC&Rs)shall not pR hbh the keeping of equine _J J_ animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said anir gals have been met.ndividual Iotowners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners'associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15.The Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions(CC&Rs)and Articles of Incorporation of the J—L� Homeowners'Associattri are subject to the approval of the Planning,^nd Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney,They shall be recorded concurrently with i;;a?".al Map or prior to the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A secoajed copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16.All parkways,open areas,and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/J_ owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted foe City Planner and City Engineer reviev;,3nd approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17.Solar access easements shad be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or ../---/— dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system.The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map of issuance of permits,whichever comes first.The easements shall prohibit the caisling of shadows by vegetation,structures,fixtures or any other object,excepi for utility wires and similar objects,pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18.The project contains a designated Histor+r.�al Landmark. The site shall be uaveloped and _J-_/— maintained irt accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. . Any further=cI tcations to the site-including,but not limited to,extefirr alterations andfor interior au�o*nswhich affect the exteriorof the buildings or structures,removal of!a...,amark trees,demolition,rekxco ion,reconstruction of buildings or structures,or changes to the site, shall require a modificat on to the Historic landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission rcview and approval, C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimrrdng pool or spa,unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency.All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with so;ar'heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, Fide and rear ele;<ations upgraded with architectural 2- treatment,detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. sC-2/91 3or12 F.Signs STr�euen o��• ✓ 1. The signs indicated on the submtted plans are conceptual only and riot apart ofthisapproval. —/ —1_ ANkL Any signs proposed for this development shalt comply With the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planni%i 0ivision priorto installation of any sign3. I3s�Nr//�(c�CG't1M,t.Tycr✓ V 2.AUndormSignProgram for this development shall besabmittedfor er;reviewand approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s)Chall be provided for apartment,condominium,or townhomes prier to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.Environmental 1. The developer shall pmWe each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. T he developer shalt provide each prospective buyer wrstters notice of the City Adopted �---�— Special Studies Zone for the Red Hilt Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway _J_J project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the ivvei of interior noise attenuation to below45 CNEL,the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate,verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures.The building plans will be checked tar conformance with the mitigation rrvaasures oontainod in the final report. H.Other Agencies 1. Emergency secondary access shallbe provided inaccordancewithFlanchoCucarlongaFire Protection District Standards. 2. Emergency access shall be provided,maintenance free and clear,amininumof26 test wide -f--f at all times during constriction in accordance with rancho Cueamunga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be Jam_ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available,pending completion of required fire protection system. `r-y ✓ 4. The applicant shall contact the U.S.Postal Service to determine the ate ty pe ype and location of mail boxes.Mufti-familyresidential developments loprrleltts shall provide a solid overhead u structure for mail boxes with adegaate lighting.The finial location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities,written certification of acceptability,including all -�—� :supportive information,shalt be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits,and prior to issuance of building pernils. sc-2/9r 6oft2 J{ -37 -6. Trees shall be plan Cum pieuun DBe: planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one ' tree per 30 linear feet of building. t--�— 7. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5*1 orgreaterslope,but less than J�- 2:1 slope,shall be,at minimum,irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. ✓ 8. All private slopes in excess of5f set,bL.;essthan8feet in vertical height and of2aorgreatew' --�—� slope shall be landscaped and irrigated forerosion control and to soften their appearance as follows:one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq..ft.of slope area l-gallon or larger size shrub pereachlOO sq.ft.ofslo and appropriate ground cover.In addition,slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 21 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq.ft.of slope area.Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane.Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed b,the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development,all slope planting and irrigation shNl be continu- ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each t Alvidualunit is sold and occupied by the buyer.Priorto releasing occupancy for those u nits,an'inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 10.For mufti-family residential and non-residential development,,property owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site,as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning,fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead,diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the data,of damage. 11.Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or JJ_ .This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. ✓ 12.The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls,.landscaping,and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape flans and shall be aubject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated fo►consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which maybe required by the Engineering Dhilsion. ✓ 13.Special landscape features such as mounding,alluvial rock,specimen size trees,meander- ing sidewalks(with horizontal change),and intensified landscaping,Is required along eTasv/tL &3e.vy. 14.Landscaping and irrigation systrtms required to be installedwithin the public right-of-way on l_ the perimeter of this project area shah be continuously maintained by the developer. 15.All walls srialfbe provided with decorative treatment.if located in public maintenance areas, _I the design shall be coordinated with the Ertmrntearing Division. ✓ 16.Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and. _J—J— approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of selected tree species. i ; ✓ 17.Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through tho principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SL sc-Z/9F sotto — GZMDicu.m Date 6. As a custom-lot subdivision,the following requirements shall be met: a.Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site ,---�- drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction +_f the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b.Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto —J-1— or over adjacent parcels,are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building parrnits. i c.On-site drainage improvements,necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided properties,are rn be installed prior to issuance of building permits for co 'ttiction upon any parcel that maybe subject to drainage flows entering, leaving,or vaihin a parcel relative to which a building permit Is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety --�—� Division for approval priorto issuance of building and grading pemxts.(This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e.All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with gmund cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other attemative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official.In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does rat release the applicanUdeveloper from compliance with the slope planting requirewnts of Section.7.08.0401 of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714)OM1862,FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L.Dedication and vehicular Accus 1.Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public.streets, _/_.—/—, community trails,public paseos,public landscape areas,street trees,and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities(cross-lot drainage,local feeder trails,etc.)shall be reserved a;., 'own on the plans and/or tentative map. ✓ 2. Dedication shall be made of the following right"f-way on the porimeter streets --�� (measured from street centerline): VOWAIR-1E 116A1514411440n Al- 17%IG4 Yb ✓M%i►8GE $ttf@WW on !L�T//ti�Nb4 AQ5 _total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made for all private streets or drives. 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: ✓ 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs __+ or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits,where no map is involved: SC:-2/91 a or 12 APPLICANTS SMALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION,(714) 989.1863, FOR ,IftCOMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L Stte Development t.The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code,Uniform Mechani- cal Code,Uniform Plumbing Code,National Electric Code,and all other applicable codes, ordinanzes,and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safet•,r Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Priorto issuance of building permits for a new residential dwemng unit(s)or major addition �—J— to existing unit(s),the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate.Suchfees may include,but are not limttedto:City Beautification Fee,Park Fee,Drainage Fee,Systems Development Fee,Permit and Plan Checking Fees,and School Fees. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or _J_J addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include,but are riot I!n%ed to:Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee,School Fees,Permit and Plan Checking Fees. V 4.Street addresses shall be provided bythe Building Official,after tract/parcet map wordation __J._(_ and prior to issuance of building permits. J.Existing Structureg 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property fine clearances considering use,area,and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 4- 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for ---/—/— the intended use or the building shall be demolished. V 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed,fllicd andlor capped to ocmplywith the Uniform Plurrnting Code and Uri7orrn Building Code. 4. Underground on-sits utilities are to be located and shown or building plans submitted for —/_J— building permit application. K.Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall ba in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,City �—y— Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance wittt 'e approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by qualified engineer licensed,by the State o'.California to �-1— perform such work. 3. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries;h w'11 Disturbance J_J Permit is required.Please contact San Bernardino County Departmentof Aoriculture at(714) 387-2111 for perrn8 appl'ranaiion.Documentation of such pennitshal(be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shalt be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist arty},;�Ubmltted at --—f the time of app''scation for grading plan check. S. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved priarto issuance of building permits sc-2/9r 70i`2 �✓, -�y Pmmct No Notes: (a)Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)Pavement. reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c)If so marked,side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD.304. (d)If so marked,an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. ✓ 4_ Improvement plans and construction: I a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights,prepared by a regis- —l-1 tared Civil Engineer,shall be submitte(4 to and approved by the City Engineer.Security shall be posted and an agreement exegrted to the ratisfactior'bf the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion'of the public andlo6rivate street Improve- ments,prior to final map approval orthe issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work barrrg performed in public riytit-of-way,fees shall be paid and a construction pert- ,nall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office In addition to any , other permits rr ,fired. c. Pavement striping,marking,traffic,street-tame signing,and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with puI!W1)xcs shallbe installedon any now construction or reconstruction of major,secondary or,mliector streets which intaisect with other major,secondary or ' collector streets for future trafficsignals.Pull boxes shall be placed on both sidesvf the street at3feetoutside of BCR,ECRoranyotherlocations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1)All pull boxes shall be No.6 unless other me specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel Kith pullrope, e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of Intersections per City J—J Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detoursdtidrtgconstruction.A street closure psmilt may be required.Acash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grdit and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g• Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewaks.Under sidewalk drains shall be _JL_J— installed to City Standards,except for singt^d family tots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be rs specified by the City Engineer. i. Street names shall beaE.^vedby the City Planner priorto submittal for first plan check. _/_J_; _5.Stre<;: improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets ahall be provided for _J_J_ review a;d approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the pri- vate streets, .fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's 0!5cs 4,!.addi5on to any other permRs required. ✓ 6,Street frees,a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger,shall be installed per City Standards in t _!_I accordance with the City's street tree program. SC-2/91 10of12 `JK-57 M�•k, •��90•�7 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map.Ask --1.-- 7,, The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction area on the _1—.!_ neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall ar-+contain the following language: •11W&hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of frP*adential)buildings(or other structures)within those areas designated on the map as bu..ding restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lotthrough the CCBA's. 8. All existing easements tying within futurerlghts-ot-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on / the final map. V 9. ' -laments for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicate'`to the City wherever they encroach onto prorate property. 10.Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along righttum lanes,to provide a minimum .-,._/_J_ of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs.0 curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane,a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. —11,The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required oft-slte procerty interests necessary to construct the required public Improvements,and 0 he/she should fail t:1 do sr, , the developer shall,at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval er_;��E ; into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the pmpertyK ;astsrequiredfortheimprovements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developerof all costs Incurred by the City to acquire the off-site,-noerty iraresisrequiredInconnecticnwiththesubdivision.Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer,at developers cost.The appraiser shali have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M.Street Improvements 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos, J_J_ landscapo4l areas,etc.)shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed.1.6 City Starw.�rds. interior street improvements shall include,but are not limited to,curb and gutter,AC pavement,drive approaches,sidewalks,street lights,and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement,within a Rt?-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be __j__j_, constructed for all half-section streets. f 3. Construct the toilowing perimeter WWI it psovements lr-.Wng,but not limited to: , STREET'NAME CURB Fs A.C. SIDE DRIVE SIIW= SIREN cc`h;. MEM OUTiER PVMT WALK APPR. LIGHTS "11ZES TRAIL I LlWD OTHER 6Tr�//LG f'G✓D ✓ ✓ � ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ �/ /wti.✓c�t�trE r ✓ � ✓ .f ./ ✓ 1/ } SC-2/41 9off2 —�b 4.A permit from the.County Flood Control District is required for work within lisright-of-way. c« pleb, Due, 5.Trees are prohibited within feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from'the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. _J-_/ `o 6.Public stone drain easements shalt b.igradedto convey overflows in the event of a —1 J— blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. F:;Utlltties 1.Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas,electric pov er,telephone,and cable TV(all underground)In accordance with the Utility Standards.Easements shall be provided as required. 2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. J_! 3.Water and sewer plans shalt be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the -l---l_ Cucamonga County Water District(CCWD),Rancho 0=mongaFire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino.A letter of compliance from the CCWD Is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Q.General Requirements and Approvals 1.The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined Into 1—!--1 one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2.An easement for a joint use driveway shall be prov.ded prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first,for. 3.Prior to approval of the final map a deiiosit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 4.Etfwand:',San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline,Secondary Regional,and Master Plan _J_J_ Drainage FL,-s shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance it no map is involved. 5.Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their rfght-of-way: J_/_ _6.A signed consent and walverform to join and/or form ttta Law Entoroement Community _.I_J_ Facilities District,-hall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits.whichever occurs first.Formation costs shall be bome by the Developer. 7, Prior to finalization of any development phase,sufficient improvement plans shall be eom- —l_l pleted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.Phase boundaries shall correspond to'lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. SC-2/91 �, 12of 12 j_J c t�Date. 7.Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for,onformance with ! adapted polic;. a. On collector or larger streets,lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, �---y-— including driveways.Walls,signs,and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructicnswithin the lines of sight shall be 2pproved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their raticeability Improved,usually by ,_/,/ moving the 2+/-closest streettrees on each Side awayfromthe street and placed in a street / free easement. r 8.Apermit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work Vdhin the following right-of-way' —l— .�rkilf//GG OLYd 9.All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the �--�— issuance of building permits- K Public Mainthnance Arm i.A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards --�---� shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.The following landscape parkways, medians, hei F eFeee are required to be annexed irdo the Landscape Maintenance District: '!�rw.vA'Z>q A,.e �g FpoJh'itG ✓b 2.A signed consent and waive;form to join andfor`'mr the appropriate landscape and Lighting Districts shall be tiled with the City Engineer priorto final nklpappf'ovalor Issuance ofbuilding permits whichever occurs first.Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3.All required public landscaping and Irrigation systems shall be coik�.:jouslly maintained by t,ha developer until accepted by the City. 4.Parkway:andscaping on the following street(s)shall cordomn to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan D.Drainage and Road Control 1. The project(or portions thereof)is located within a Flood Hazard Zone-,therefore,flood —J— protection nreasuras shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engine 2.It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prapara all necessary reports,plans,and hydrelogic/hydrauiic caulations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR)shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A LaUer of Map Ravision(L.OMR)shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement act;eptance,whicheve•occurs first: e< 3.A f!net drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by thz City Engineer prior to final l—l_ map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage i facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. SAC-2191 ttort2 � `' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' TENT PM 13724 = THE WATTSON Co June 26,'1°91 Page 2 �•s II. ANALYSIS; The purpose of the Parcel Map is to create'15 parcels for thedevelopment of a shopping center. The Master Plan for development of the site is on tonight's agenda as CUP 90-37. The�.relationship of the-parcel lines to the site plan is shown on Exhibit_"(! " y Foothill Boulevard will be unproved along the project frontage to Include full width improvements on the south side, median island with f' landscaping, two lanes on the north side, reconstruction of the''Etiwanda Avenue intersection, and a signal at the main enhance. T!�e developer is requesting to relocate westerly the .Medfan openinor— V)othill 'Boulevard from where currently ,specified in the Footh,,,fl` Specific Plan and to add a second ),eft turn in only medlar 'openir;g on Foothill Boulevard. A request to modify the circulation;etement-of"the Foothill Specific Plan is on tonight's agenda as FSP Amendment 90-03. The driveways on Etiwanda' Avenue do not conform to the standard City � spacing requirements.This'creates a potential traffic.-ionfl ict beween left turn movements to the northerly project driveway acid to Chestnut Avenue. To minimize this potential 601 ict, double left turn lanes wftl be provided, This application was originally submitted as a Vesting Ten,tative Parcel Map. The applicant has moved t� : finq designation, bezause not all of the project'approvals {DRs, etc.}."have been obtained as yet, which is required by City,ordinance for a vesting map. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW,. The applicant complet.z`)Part I of the Initial. Study tat 'c"onducted a field investleatt6n and completed Part I1 of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are - anticipated as a result of this project, Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Pub!is Hearing have been sent to s-j r:;'nd1ng property owners and placed in the Inland-Vtlley Daily Bulletin. Posting at the site has also be,n completed. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT y DATE: June 26, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members 6� thej,Planning commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer 1 BY Ping 'hon,�ssistani)Engineer i SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT"AHD TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP- 3724 - THE w 7F su d,v s on of 59.9 acres of MR into Ta:psrc`e s n t e Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial designations.of the Foothill Eouleva�d Specific Plan (Subarea 4), located at tite south side of_FLgthil l'Br it evard between Interstate 15 and tiwanda Avenue (APM: 229-031-03 thru 13, 15, 16 A 20.) i j, E I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION': A. Action R2 uested: Aeproval of the proposed Tem.,=tine Parcel Map as shown nn x Nff"S. B. Parcel Size: Percels range in size from .51 to 13.55 acres, refer i to t e to a on Exhibit "B". f C. Existing Zoning: Commercial nndjor.,dndusl�ial Park. D. Surrounding Land Use: North - Mixed Use South - M.W.D. facility, Ir.3ustrial Plant and aacan% East - Vacant and Single Family Residential West - Interstate 15 and Vacant E. Surroundirtd General Plan and DeveloRment"lode esignritions: Nor,:h - Commercial South - General Industrial East -Commercial and Low Residential. (2-4' Dwelling units per acre) sast' - Comnerc'<,` F. Site Characteristics:". The northerly ;portion of the sits has ex sUn-9 ouses-w t the majority of the property being vacant. _ ITEo L P'-,INNING C0MISSION STAFF REPORT i£NT PM 13724 - THE WATTSON CO r June 26, 1991 Fage 3 A+ ll V. RECOM.MENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Cortmission'ionsider a �npu P—elements of the Tentative Parcel ;'dap 13724. If after such consideration, the Commission can recoamend approval, then tree adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, \ Barrye Hanson t Senior Cil Engineer J BRH:PK:jh ` Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" -,jertative Map Exhibit "C" -`Site Plan ,`- Resolution and Recommended conditions of Approval L-- �\ Zll r mwlraa0o moo nror..e a �rl. -�C; C;O O O c;4 N O Ol�NOA 'tp to s, r o d ej F • � � 'L1. A- �. �r1N lOW O1C:t•°®OtO.t N.:l9 van- . ej • H INC . t cl I of B ul �! lzi IF i � i Ir i _ L r/ a , t I a --71 - � ill ee% t Mst` .Ili � � 1 Ilmmmn lemnunnmm 1— I � IIrr'' rZ _ CLI 11 j t2 ill Jj —n minl'�»rr+rTinnaS �'• 11 ' + s iL'/!.lYl.�f7Aj •� ilk 111 ,naaaatcmN' ies 1111 IP�ts:;y,�sQ! �; -� �Immrm mmumlc pnrunn ii • ' + ,6HNl181HIi!H611UI! aNHNI81�IM11HIM pl QA !t lxfftgt ( ® 11� t 1, iNllBI1'IA ynNIEC; ...... nll! 1111Hllflfit!M(HIfNq��r!lH?SIINiH511NIlHIfIfN}IIIl `:Yllu HII111N! C NfAiIH1 t 1H fiNJHIHIINNlI-: i� 'u.nwal,, ��nnmmmnnln� 1. ' !:ua L• - } apmiwuuuuuluA,mmuy ,; � �l I i n i tm r nm tumuunlifsl I!N, u •�mnw w qp LL Vol 1:L�/�/ff'.�.4ffrfrfrfl4�II t c 1 - W N t Ah11ANI LtmMMIIIHI HIM 111101WHIRRI1f7 lm .wlrtleelrc IIH NIMI9NNtlb x I1"P.11HIN ♦ SlVann V'1 (pm lu n uen).I — � ! IF!N5i!iHS�11�I _ . 1 lIHIMONHWIi ( � � � � 'INNIW.,iNWfllln �iiLillhld(! � � ::`8NHM1l;I r9q \ �t(•�"It V ' .�1zI ,' PLANNING CO11MISSION'RESOLu,11ION NO. TPM 13724 THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26 1991 Page 2 1. Existing Overhead Utilities ^ a. Foothill Boulevard - An in lieu .,fee as contribution to the future undergroundincT of the existing overhead utilities (telecomunica,tion and electrical) on the opposite side of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the approval of the final Parcel Map. The fee shall be one half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of 'Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly terminus pole. b. Etiwanda Avenue - An in lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrial except for the 66 kv electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be,paid to the City prior to the approval of the Final Parcel Map. The fee shall be one half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the ,center of Foothill, boulevarc to the south projectctoundwry. c Overhead utility service lines which cross Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be removed concurrently with the removal of the existing houses on the 'south side of Foothill Boulevard. 2. Foothill ,Boulevard shay% be constructed f=om Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly 2roject boundary as follows: a. Full width on;thrt south aide including the median curb. f, b. The ultimate backbone system on the north side consisting of two travel lanes (29-foot wide pavement) and the median curb or as otherwise ) approved by the City Engineer. = ' c. Landscape the median island. The developer may roquest a reimbursement agreement to recovv;= the cost of ono-half width of landscaping fronting his project from future development of across-the- Street properties. d. Construct a complete intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard with trans.4,tions to meet -existing pavement east on Foothill Boulevard and north on Etiwanda Avenue. Also, the traffic W?gnals shall be modified at the intersection of r RESOLUTION gt). A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OFF.._ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLI: APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13724, LOCATED,.ON THE..SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD HETWIEN INTERSTATE 15 AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREU�, - APN: 229-031-03 through 13, 15, 16 & 20 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13724, svbmicted by The Wattson Company, applicant, for the pur-)ose of subdividing into 15 parcels, °,che real _ - property situated in the City of Rancho-Cucamonga, Coo+it 4 y of San Bernardino, State of California, identified do APN,$) 229-031-03 through 13, 15, 16 & 20, located at .he south side of Foothill Scclevard between Interstate 15 :and Etiwanda Avei,ue; and WHEREAS, on .;une ,26, •1991, the Planninv Commission held a 'du),y advertised public hearing for the above-described mar NOW, THEREFORE, THE;RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING FOLLOWS: COMMISSION 1 MMI5SION RESOLVE. AS r SECTION is That the ,following findings have been made; 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3, That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial envirc.nmental damage or public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting PropertiCZ. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and, considered in compliance with the California EnvironmentalQuun.ity Act of 1970, and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 23724 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Reciprocal parking shall be proviesd by CC&Rs. r ENGINEERING DIVISION? _. PLANNING COMMIS!BIOTt RESOLUTION NO. TPM 13724 THD WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 4 il. A lot line adjustment shall be recorded to Incorporate the northerly; positiorn of APN 229-021-59 and the westerly portion of P.PN 229-031-16 into this project prior to the approval of the Final Parcel Map. 12. All of the project driveways and the internal drive' aisles to be used by trucks sha?1 be designed to accomodate the Caltrans standard 50-foot radl%is turn template unless justification is provided for a s 'sor design radius as approved by the City Engineer. 13. The property necessary for the ,proposed freeway off ramp at the northwest corner of '_he site shall be reserved. It appea;a that Caltrans will not allow the retaining wall shown cn the plans; therefore, additional land to what is shown an the plans`will need to be reserved as approved by Caltrans and,the City Engineer.. Also, the project plans will need to be mo,'. fied accordingly. 14. Drainage fees for the Development shall be paid as follows: a. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area fees for the portion of the site within that area boundary (easterly ft. acres). b. General City area fees ,for the portion of this site outside of the Etiwanda,.':San Sevaine Area, and c. A payment equivalent to the Day Creek Mellow Roos Assessment of $4675 per acre for the portion of the site currently outside the Day Creek Channel Mello Roos District Boundary. 15. Approval shall be obtained from MWD and. SBCFCD to accept the existing flows from 'north of Foothill Boulevard to the facility along Arrow Highway and Day Creek Channel. If such approvals can not be obtained, alternate f,�'ilitlee such as those req uired by the San Etiwanda . / s Drainr:ge Policy (Area 9) shall be provided, as al., �.i by the City Engineer. 16. Intersection drains shall b4 provided acrossFoothill Boulevard at Etiwanda`Avenue sized to convey as much flow as feasible as approved by the City Engineer. 17. Drainage facilities shall be extended to the north side of foothill Boulevard along the project frontage to collect as much flow as f-asible as approved by the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUT:ON NO. TFM_13724 THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 3 Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Both items shall be as approved E by the City;' ngi:ger. e. The developer shall be eligible for fee c edits against and reimbursement from the Transportation Development Fee for the ion ort o" ' f th e, v p--Ov omen P is determined by the City Engineer to be ' Of _supplemental size, length, or capacity over that needed for the impacts of thi{! development in conformance with ordinance No. 45B. 3. A traffic signal shall be- installed at the main entrance on Foothill Boulevard., 4. The median island within Foothill Boulevard shall be moved southerly so that it is symmetrical ubout the centerline or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. S. The Foothill Boulevard buabay shall be:aored westerly to be as close as possible to the median opening to reduce potential jaywalking across Foothill Boulevard. AML 6. Etiwanda Avenue shall be widened on both sides as necessary to accomodate the street improvements necessary to mitigate the traffic impacts of the project as required by the City Engineer. 7. Provide -double (opposite dire >ion) left turn lauds within Etiwanda Avenue to serve the project entrances, Chestnut Avenue, and a future driveway on the east side of. Etiwanda Avenue or as otherwisE approved by the City Engineer. x. Provide curb-adjacent sidewalk for the buabay on Foothill Boulevard. Also, the curb adjacent sidewalk for thn buabay on Etiwanda Avenue shall be minimized. 9. Provide meandering sidewalk in accordance Guth City Standard No.,304 on Etiwanda Avenue. Sidewalks shall meet driveways at the zero face C•'-* b return except for the main entrance on Foothill Boulevard or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 10. A final traffic study showing calculations for the determination of the length of all left turn lanes on Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue based on post 2010 traffic conditions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs fs.rst. All street facilities shall be installed as required by the 'City Engineer. ' PLANNING COMMISSION P.ESDLUTION NO. TPK-23724 THE fWATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 6 required handling charge for filing a Certifivate of Fee Lxemption, ,this condition shall be.deemed null and void. PIILDING AND SAFETY Dx�ISIDN � 1. All structures &hall comply with property line protection requiremen', pi the Uniform Building, Code as approved by the Building Official. FIRE SAFETY DIVISION 1, UP6vade the fire hydrants and supply s stlu upon dev4,iopment.- 2. The nonttherly portion of the project shall be annexed to Hello Rose District CFD ES-1a APPROVED ANJ°'ADOPTED THIS 26th DAY OF JUNE 1991, PLANNIt% COMMISSIO11 OF Th£' CITY "F RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY:___ r, Larry T. McNiel, Cht3,-man ATTEST • Brad Buller, Secreta-y I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,,, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rax;cho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting: of the Planning-Commission held on the 26th ;day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: At£9ENT: COMMISSIONERS: ti PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TPk 23724 - THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 2991 Page 5 18. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of the drainage entering the property from 'the adjc;ent Caltrans area to the west. 19. The small portion of the southeast corr-r of the property shall be regraded- to drain ,' the MWD facility. 20. Construct storm drain facilities to serve the +'' te generally ae `�hown on the plans and as described,�in the project preliminary drainage report subjict to final plan check and a_ final drainage report as approved by the City Engineer.' 21. Easements for and permission to construct storm drain facilities on and convey flows to riff-site properties shall be obtained and pr^t_8ed as approved by the City Engineer. 22. Easements for public store drains within the site shall be provided. 23. The DeveloPer and the City shall enter into an Agftk agreement that transfers maintenance responsibilities from. the City to the Developer for the drainage facilities serving Foothill Boulevard at such time in the future that alternate facilities for disposing of the Foothill Boulevard drainage &,fie provided as approved by the City tatorney and City,Engineer. 24. Purnuant to provisions of Gehifornia Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this appiication shah not be operative, 'rested or final,' nor will buildino be issued or' a map a corded, until (1) the.:Wo ce of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed puzauant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paie-to the County Clerk of the CJunty of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a stamp4d and conformed COPY of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. In the event th11 ''application is determined. exempt c from such filing' ; 'to he - provisions of the California Pis aes pursuant h and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, %xcept for payment of-,,a ny l -1 1 tea. d^ a a- �r Z�k s> N n a E O A C A a•.o. No .ny� rY ~aT tN. a,oY G E V A U O Y d W d F NC y00 O�c y. pp yWei m + R I y `,�� y mod. 'io m•� Qom.- .� y. 9 V w•Ta oq .. a � VC 'N d- No Z 3sa =moo G C yam.. Lcp Gi O O C C OdV dq Od yLu � F4 � 4N. yL.p � � Oq aL = 6Z � 6y� �.�'� . C1n,� c 40�• OnE dr W ^ J 'O 4�. �C r tr O. A. ti Ol �= �'4 OOC etp VQ A LG O Y . GO c nJY � LAia �c Od a u u� `b y... - 'lo 12 ,^ $ oas �F O.A � 0a .DLO a Sd O N` puue. ZZ dL add.L = G ^ a ^,zU a4san r> °. CC d{ EE \ L L a eY adi x N C �. 4a O -b A u — eey e' S d M L N W d O d P ^C L V L tl. of O O.Y a `oo 0. Eat u' � '�:� E ad'> t: �a oa O KaN U� d LI�Ce L� 6 HY� O V� CL O ...1 0�. �^ E ai NU G O qy V.� � •� N a.a 2! r a .ra _ y i .��o I : I � � ► I . C �1 Iz t � a DN ZYM Re LyN z v o^ S}p pa Ig —ew X. iy ad d N $ Y N d3EQ ^ .Cnt. a ce d R t a € ga.d� s `N ti �EC� ZY �N ; L`cy .a � 3 g 33o N S 'o`n p C oad a.,a ad nL •c'a-3st,g 4�E 8- -Ate 1' Da a4 � aPS 8 qWq E 4-0� 4 Y8g Sd� d.� 2 .. o 1��gep u a v� �"� ti.� � I... �a u` c M •��� p�ya .O Z�' a e,p$o ^ N ^ iNEi < N b d L-13 077 ceLGe� VP/ DEYELOPERS-REALTORS INVESTMENTS I J I June 25, 1991 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Larry McNeil Chairman Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California 917?9 Re: Planning Commission Public Hearing, June 26, 1991; i pnquest for Postponemrit of Consideration"of Ili %attson Project, Agenda Items J. K and L Dear Mr. McNeil: As you mat recall, we are the owners of the property located to the east of the 1-15 Freeway and north of Arrow Route in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A map depicting our property in relation to the property which is the subject of the above referenced public hearing (Agenda items J, K and L) , is included. as Exhibit 1 of the volume of Exhibits which` accompanies this letter. The map also shows property owned by others in the block bounded by I-15 on the west, Foothill Boulevard on the north, L'ciwanda Avenue on the east, and Arrow Route on the south. The purpose of this letter is to advise you of certain matters noncerni,-r the public hearing which has been noticed tc`consider, among other matters, the proposed develogment of the Wattson Project, an "approximately 60 acre- retail/commercial center immediately to the north and east of our property. 1 copy of the Notice of Public Hearin, is included as,Exhibit 2. we have been }" advised that a key feature of tho 'wattson Project is that its two major Tenants will be a Price Club and a Wal-Mart store. At the outset, we want to maka it clear that we are not in complete opposition to t?-: Wattson Project. Indeed, for the most part we support it, and we especially support the plan of having Price Club and Wal-Mart locate in the City In the:proposed j vicinity. To date, we have cooperated in numerous,ways with the 22703 Aspan St.,Suite 701,Take Forest-El Tbvo,California 926, ,kphone(714)770-1633 I i Mr. Larry McNeil dune �-, 1991 Page 2 Wattson company in its'.attempt to process its proposed development. We he ve shared plans with them, we have In 7oduced them to prospective t,tpants, we have agreed to sell them a .9.7 acre piece of propert r (the northerly portion of our Tentative Tract 9326), which is a key part of the,proposed project (although thay-have not closed escrow yet and have had to extend the same), and we have agreed to provide an easement to them for drainage, sewer, water and fire hydrant purposes across our remaining ;propertl if they do close escrow." Thus, in many ways, we hope the Wattson Company, as general partner of Foothill Marketplace Partners, the owner of the Wattson Project,-TRill succeed in its endeavor. . In any event, and as,the remainder of this letter will make clear, while there are many aspects of the Wattson Project we support, we strongly oppose the traffic component of the Wattson Project as proposed. We think the proposed street plan is short sightad, is not in the hest interests of the City, is damag_ng to the other property owners in the black (including us), is inconsistent With many const*za5.nts the. City has always placed on us, is in breach of agreements the Ci„,yT has-made with us as we have attempted to do our own plants g, is =ntrary to policies the City has previously promulgated,_ and has reached this stage without affording us any (much less a reasonable,or fair) opportunity to participate in the ,planning process and to present preferred rlternatives. Tr(-- latter point cannot be overstated because we are, in fact, still the owner of part of the property which is the subject of thr proposed proje"t. How the process got so far without our participation is an absolut mystery to us! Cousequently, strongly believe that insofar as the Wattson Project is concerne&, the currently noticed'pusaic hearing should be postponed. We hope you will, agree 4.1th us after reading this letter. In our opinion, there .remain soneral important issues that need te, be resolved cosnerning the prvpooed project which would be more appropriately resolved at on_ or more stud] sessions with the City and Wattsor, 'mapany representatives rather than at a public hearing. if yc; do' not„agre,a with us,_ however, then the matters raised in this both those expressed above and the ones fi,hat follow,_ Via •edited as our objections to the act; - proposed to bt�--_ public hearing :nd we• express.ly . rve the righit to. r tion taken based upon the 'issue:, raised in this lett�_-, , s such other issues as may be raised at the hearing. i I Mr. Larry McNeil June .25, 1991 Page 3 1. The Proposed traffic plan does iot best _�Arve the nsecs of the community. Thz site plan which is'proposed for the Wattson Project is attached f:,r reference as Exhibit 4. As you can see, the site plan provides for streets off of Foot P P hall Boulevard only to the Project property and does niut provide for street access from Foothill to my property or to property owned by others. I_, other words, the block has not been master planned. 'Not only is this spot_pli-nning approach not in the best interests ce the community, it is also contrary to instructions the City has always given -to as as we, have attempted to develop our property. See letter of Decembe%• :8- 1989, from Steve Ross to 7,ruce Mauner and attachments theretc 'Wi.Och are en6losea as 73'xhib.:t 5. It is also a departure 2rom City policy end contrary to City Resolution 89-370, adopted Mar:-' 1, 1989 and rele;ced Staff Report dated January 25, 1989, both of which are included as R):;iibit 6. See uarticularly page OP-9 of the January 25, 1985 Staff Report Which depicts by diagram the re;l.e rant site area for planning purposes. Finally, the proposed traffic plan is based to in extent on mere.:speculation as to how the Wattson' Project will develop and, even accc.,rdinj to the current Staff Re-port, there could be "substantial r.lianges" to the part of the Project immediately to the north of omr property where the streets impact us the most. See :staff Repk)rt, p. J,K-.3,- attached as Exhibit 7. 2. The traffic study which was pre-aired in support of the Wattson Project was sevara__ly and inappropriately confines n its seoo­ The traffic study whica was prepared in conn:.ction with the '3attson Project was pterformed by The Keith Companies in November, 1990. We. have had the study ,reviawed by Austin-Foust Associates, inc., a highly regarded traffic: engineering company (which has in the past been engaged as a consultant by the City). Pleas:,- review the latter to us from Austin-Foust dated June 14, 1991, a cony of which is enclosed as Exhibit 8. Ycu will note that: t'nF _,ith Engineering study is expr issly limited'in its scope t..M is result criented, in that it is overly influenced by the desires of the proposed major tenants, Price Club and Wal N::.rt.- The Keith Companies' study is also in conflict with earlier studies performed by the same firm in August 1988. See August 18, 1988 letter from Thomas C. Carmody, Keith Companie., Director of Engineering, to Russel Maguire, City Engineer, and attached street plan (EyUbit 9 to this let tar) In summary, the :Y traffic study assumes that the Project will '-..rave no traffics impact outside the immediate boundaries.of :he Pxojcct. This is '. clearly a. faulty assumption for a project contemplating two major retailers, pat -ing spaces for 3,200 automobiles and 30,000 vehicle trips a day from throug:.,out the City and surrounding r: areas. r' I ,.. Larry McNeil 3'une25, 1991 Page 4 If the City adopts the site planr_opos�sd by the Wattson Prc iect,the_Cit ry will 'breach its agreement with us. On November 30, 1939, the City agreed with us that, if we h4red Aurtin--F,ust to perform a traffic study for the entire block, the City would adopt the Austin-Foust recommendations. For a more detailed explanation of this issue, reference is made to my letter to Paul Rougeau (City Traffic: Engineer) dated April 12,` 1991, which is .enclosed as Exhibit- i0. I am also enclosing a copy of the Rustics-Foust study dated January 31, 1990, as Exhibit 11, and copies of two update letters dated September 25, '1990 and May 20, 1991, P-2 Exhit- is 1" and 13, respectively., At a-recent meeting uAich we attended with three staff membe,.;,s on June 20, 1991, we were advised by Rick Gomez that he did riot recall i�ae city making this "agreement" and that, in any event, the City , could not be weld to this "agreement" because proper channels were not folaowed. We do not now intend to debate wt_ther Mr. Gomez is legally correct We ;assert that he is -not, but the ' resolution of that issue may have to be'decidea at a later time, More important now is thet moral .,sue. We were told the City would follow the Austin-F,-gust recormendations and we have planned accordingly. Now the City proposes to ignore both us and those - sec;ommendations, without any satisfactory or timely,—explanation, or any chance for us to participate in the Xocess irior to the City Staff adopting,i s r.-ecommendations. This it _ mply wrong. 4. The proposed traffic plan includes no consideratir.--_ -whatsoever that our property inight: and likely will be developed with substan•cial commercial and office uses. At our meeting with tche City representatives on :LTune 20; 1991, we were advised by Paul Rougeau, the City Traffic Engineer, thz,.t he did not believe it was appropr',ate for the street :ystam on this block to permit circulation between the. Watteon Project, which is a commercial project, and our property, which-he dascri;)ed as industrial. Of course, Mr. Rougeau is co=ett that our property is zoned General Industrial. Buy, that does not mean w(,, are limited to strictly industrial uses. In fact, the zonifij clearly permits both commercial and,office;uses and it is equally, clear that, given the development in the region that has occurr,_d, the highest and test use of our property is mixdd use, with a significant commercial and office element. Thus, internal circulation between the two tracts will be mutuaily beneficial. This issue will be further discussed :at the public hearing. 4 Mr. harry McNeil Juve 25, 1991 Magi\ 5 5." An Environmental Impact Report is necessary. We �f Ir have been advised by legal counsel that the magnitude of thic7 project, which is estimated to :increase vehicular traffic-in the ar,a by some 30,O00 vehicle trips per day,, should definitely have an Environmental Impact Report prepared in order to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act. Without an EIR, the City q 11 be approving_a project with potentiaily significant" traffic, air quality and cultural impacts without knowing the full extent of those im acts.- CEQA also requires the City to consider the cumulative impacts of all expected'traffic (andvthe' resiilt4ng air quality impacts), including the 'impact of projects anticipated to be developed in the vicinity in the future. The Tack of internal circulation will clearly have an impact on the external streets (Foothill, Etiwanda. and Arrow);, but this impact is not addressed. Moreover, CEQA requires that the City considers reasonable alternatives to the Project, such as a smaller project or a master planned approach to the circulation element of the entire block,, but this has not been done. 6. The pronosei traffic circcilation iattern does not coordinate with, and ianori a the street battern established by neighboring Tentative Trac, 932 6. .Our property to the .�outh of the proposed Wattson Projek ! is the subject of Tentative,Trsct 9326. .A copy of that map is submitte`ld as Exhibit 14. As is evident, the top of the loop street which the City has insisted on as a part of Tract 9326 borders on the proposed Wattson Project. Yet, the Wattson Project.does. not account for that street at all. :his is a clear defect in plaAning. All exhibits delivered with and referred to in,thi3 letter are incorporated by ,reference. Very truly yours, Daniel L. Plie4 and Anita I. Plies Mr. Larry McNeil June 25, 1991 Page 6_ 1 cc: commissioner Cliitiea Commissioner Melcher Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Vallet`e Mr. Rick Gomez, Community.Developm_nt Director Mr. Brad Buller, City Manner Mr. Paul Rougeau, C*ty Traffic Encjineer Mr. Jack Lam, u^�',ty Manager Mr. Tony Watt-son' The Wattson_ Company Latham & Watkins 1 ;j ,rJ , EXHIBITS TO LETTER BATED FJNE 25, 1991 T�OM ANIrA I. PLIES ANC,DANIEL L. PLIES TO MIR. LARRY MCN:EIL=,CHAWWAN,OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSIf.11 r C f -, cl. r w -- J ®- O 4p II I . i L KAM, ................ p IS W t. 4f E, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MODIFICATION CONDIT27NAL USE PRRMI 86-Q5. R_TCHARD STENTON Modification of conditions of -'approval to ' allow land rises requiring a more intensive parking ratio than the 'orq.-j provteled for research;and. development (1 '-:;epace per _350 ® _square, feet) within an existing ;industrial complex on .13.7 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of : the Industrial Area SpecAfic Plan, located on the- northwest corner of Buffalo and 6th Strf.t - APN, 2'j9-261-+78. Staff recommends issu,,ince of a. Negative Declaratioi.. (Continued fr'am June �V F. ENV?RONME. L ASSESSMENT AND CONDITLONALUSF PERMxT -91`3 JAMES PAGE. - The ,request to establish a "mini-mall" (swap meet) '.n a leased space of 103,552 square feet within an existing industrial center on 13.77 acres of land in the General Industrial District, (Subarea 11) of the Industrial ,Area Specific Plan, located r'^ 11530 Sixth Street APN: 229-026-28. StL_. t recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. Related file Conditional Use Permit 86-06. (Continued from June 12, 1991.) v. . ENVTRONMFNTAL ASSESSMENT ANA DMV ,OPMENT R��•E72EW a 17 - DIVER_5:_EM - The development of Phase III of a 4eighborhood commercial shopping I! center consisting `of two retail buildings f totaling 14,800 square feet on 12.96 ;acres of: laDd within an approved shopping center in the Ne borhood Commercial District, lo" ad< at the northeast corner of Haven, and ''Alghland � Avenues N: 261-271-65 and 71. Staff recommends issuance of a :Negative Declaration. (Continued from. June'12, 1991.) H. ENVIRONM'6N°AT, ASSESSMENT AND CONDTmTON 7 USF FERMI_ SQ:�t7 WILLOWS COIIMTJNT'TS �CFIZTRCH. PASTO?2 ES lc HIND -, LEY - The re to estab -%.. hsh as china school in a -leas:d, space of 8,429 ® sguar4, *feet within an existing office nark on 12.59 acres of land in the: Office Professional zone, boat=d at 10601 ChUich Street, - APM 1077-421-31.. Staff z--"ommends i3suence of a Negative Declaration_. : ;~1: !l I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE N ACT 14795 HANDAH INTERNATIONAL - A residential subdivision and design review for 13 condominium units on 1.23 acres of land in the Medium 'Residential District (8-14 dwelling 'units per acre), located on the north side of ArrJW Route, east of the extension of Ma-drone Avenue APN;- 207-2:1,1--:.0, 11, and 24. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. X., E 7MONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OTHI B(LT EVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT" 9 --04 H '-WATTSOX COMPANY - A request,-tom the median break ]location on Foothill Boulevard, to add a median break location on Foothill Boulevard, and to change the,lard use designation from Light Industrial to~Regional Related Commercial for rr/ an area of approximately 26 'acres within the Foothill Boulevard :specific Play.- (Subarea 4), located on the mast side of .Interstate 15, 'south of Foothill Boulevard. These requests are in conjunction with the development of 'a ±60 acre retail/commercial center located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between I I-15 and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 22!'-031-03 1 1 J.' through 13, 15, 16., :and-20. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.. Re;11;.ed i` Files: Conditional Use Permit 90 a ti Tentative Parcel Flap 13724. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-37 .- THE'WATTSON COMPANY - A request for master plan approval of a ±60 acre retail/commercial center containing approximately 550,000 square feet of leasable space and a request for approval of conceptual site plan and building elevations for the Price Club facility in the Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial designations of the F'oothillsBoulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4), located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue APN: 229-031-03 through 13 15, 16, and 20. Staff recommends issuance of a �► mitigated ' Negative 'Jecla'ration'. Related. Fifes: Foothill Boulevard Specific plan Amendment'90-04 and Teri%ative Parcel Map 13724. 'A I I 'I VI1. �0, Htasiness V111. New'Business M Direal;or r s Repor(s ' S2• CO�TJS112ERATION OF ADDING IDET SHOPS ;-H A Px'f2MITTED OR CONDITIONALLY`2•ERMITTED USE IN THE Mi94ERMAL/OFFICE DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL DOU"r.,EVARD SPECIFIC p".xAN X, Commission'Busine39 XI, PublIc Comments: This is the time and place for the'+,teneral public to address the Commission. Itemstto, be discus,aed here are those which do'not alx9sady vp'l- ar on this agenda. $II. Adjqurrment. The-Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that 'set an 11:0r :R,X. adjournment time. If items go beyond that tiitiq�, they shall be heard only with the consent of the ommission, i r L- _ NVIRONTSENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PAR TS , 0 ASAP 13724 - THE TIATTSOW CaM-PANY -A subdivisions of 56.91 acr es of land into 15 Iiarcels in the Regional Related Commercial aid Lght Industrial designations of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4), located on ° the south side of Foothill Boulevard "between Interstate iS ,_,and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 229--031-03 through 13, 15, 16, and 20. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related Files: Foothill ioulrvaid• Specific Plan Amendmeait- 90-04 and Conditional Use Permit 90-37.' �® M. CONDITIONAL%USE PERMIT 91-15 - SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP ;( A request to establish a wholesalejretail silk flower<,�_axrangement custom manufacturing use within the existing Arrow Business Park on 9.6 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the _Industrial, Specific Plan, located at 9087 Arrow Route, 0120 - APN: 205-013-19. ITEM WTTHAR�tW1. N. EMRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TEHTAT3b'E TRACT 14120 ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPNNY - A residential subdivision of 68 single family lots -on 53.05 acres of land in the Very Low Residential )istrict (1-2 dwelling units per acre) cif,the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on •.he north and south sides of Summit Avenue, approximately ,1,300 feet west` of Etiwanda Avenue - AM 225-111-22 ;and 225-171-02, 08, 11, and 16. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated ' Negative Declaration.: Associated with this project is =ee. Removal„Permit 91-21. O. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 22 - `tTINEYARD NATIONAi BANK - The request to establish an ® administrative and office use in a leased space of 8,100 square feet within an existing industrial park in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at 9495 9th Street - APH: 2097032=24 P. SIT"XRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE ,MENDMENT` 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A request to add'Section 17.08.040-P and Section 37.08.070-E 'to -.the Development aCcae establishingproperty maintenance standardja�and .) ongoing maintenance; reruirements for multiple A+ family dwellings. (TO F. l CONTINUED TO JULY 10, _ n� 16f11111!'ll{4f��� � \ it ,t �m l�Ulfl,�IllBlllllll�,� f� f, ,: x ' `, =s i(liinlNIIIIIIINI till «� ' willllllillm111 fl1{ •fl �G�' L`= IlnitW!NlU1W � L.. c $P" s> ammmlmu 1 -imimn�\ Tx1. ►UIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIII till". _Swa rs .: �(plillli{Ill.alllll101 = (t '..:w rZ . om=rI� t IN11111111111ii1I1111fOj _� �. Ilwnul m :14N1111111I1111111,i{I41 t rltwntmmml a' 61111111111111111181NIIIillli{IIIIIIII{m�01111111111111111{IIIIIiIIIIUIIIf4�1 fl d i" { + _ il!'//rSf$f ffW////////1NrD r 3 D i Yorksj � \��(rY\rf\YMlf\ A M� \ \\ MN �VYIIIl�llH!IWFII.hh'> O. \ • . 11 i� i l NAN 8 r `It t In o' I lt�\\`li\\\`2�\\`2��\\\uW\\\\uuy �Iugl �ntwwww wolunulwluilunQ ti 1 sn y. wIW �Jllllg It It -Y' =-,nnn nnnmmnununinnd, �(olnunimnnu\t till n 1 1 f l 1 It .e gg IilllllNllllllNHllllllllllll1l11G� tll11111UgpilllGt� �-.l.t, fl : �,:a -,- "$ i' _'UIIIIII{IIIIUIIiilll{iIIIINIIIIW- ilpliniiirillll'1"IIIw!_ °"""' itl it " 1 e mtuutlwwwluuwwuutwn I�911DlIHIiH11111i111Q: jlt �, II II 'r Q„.= Ii it t � i II It i;p�r • .=� fi � I�ilillllilt,lllilllllliq `I� u « �cq: ��� � = s^ �i1711111111iihIllU;,llB r�h�'nuoni, U Dllif111hdi111111111111 1I f tii tl If Ilim Y �0.illllllliililliillilllfl �`� 1; IQIIII{I{IIIIIIIIIilliilll:it �-��j�`�,; �ttnlltUttt L rouywuuwuuwnns I l �l it a — . :,� y= m A ± Imo_ 1 I i����i�//�1 ��i II If m ,"'- . _ a Illuirin�''\\\\OM 6fill Il I m y atwtn` ti II s 11IIt � � i <C muuul��lu�ww' Ii tI , r>� rl tl Il nu p I ii r r to to !(C77 r• C? mC m a ?a n``,` p1 'i CI 9 U m N tQ[ [A7 > ar i Dl\R\\\\\\\\]i ;nT ! tD < t }�j j llUtU�lUlUl1U110 I tiUWIWUUW �11 Ii 91 it �:v Nis �rxr«.A-,��Yn-:> ,.. �� � .., j �¢�.-_—,a`,r�,� ,_ rr i • -�. O. H _tl. t..1 I EF Q ,, 11 isfinttnmrmm~ r, go �g+Jj t 'ui` �uuluunvruin J a� u Il Ilj) t✓.y(//ff'/a>�Il g aCjU 0.3 to G t. 4 '� ' w 3�s�'. u/Q _ o ii'rii yeN1(NflI �' l `� a sin v 11 I It Ww i:k\\\\\`\\\it It \ \ 1 r 11 11 ,armmr rtg�fry� , S i " ll,l Il 4( 1 tl%i,.pi�Ni�''71j �1 Il I Il i ruts(`U�(.ain11 -•:: _, ,o- '— �.. ,r m 11 It mtmn Ifit\\\\�\i\\`F1 it It :IAflillGl 1 �I ' ' 1 U �itlmiiiilll} � yy� w u tli uu ROM on Y _ ��—`� ira5 of �4! 11 r Ioma,�I 1l�jlllnllq tr7f/!ll/r YIl ?�. - JE 'imitmmintlnminut'�Jllt!i:at[a _ It it . ����� �1� AluuuallllllaluAll; - oAOAAIIAAprIII!vl q g !s1 nmm> iif 4 Di{lillltll{I{1JtN1611t _ `p {IILIAIililill It fillEffjj 3 ". t �l i 11 1l 'I I 'GIIIdII11111C:IIIIII Ajlwnummmnnmrmlmrmrm i .�lumud � =IgIIIIIIAIINIiIIiBI�� RIlIIAl11111111111A1}Illlllililli 11 �e : . �. � """'` ii i'I�=� ,' `:91111p{Illlii{il>tl ��_'--_ lEllflllllllllllllllHlllllllilllllll= � k� tl j1 Ilt a iu1Ea�`nuuumwunn� tluuutnuttuwtunuu uuu =_ ""<� tl 11 Glhlls�, - -- �c1MMM ng tmmrmtn , i=. t1 IU Inn `? 111jtn min U lmimimmlmmLlj� lwl�. 1 WHOW �0\\1\\\\\\\`;\M\`A\`2:\\\\\`A\\W` 31y j e �"✓',firffSSf1hf9,Y1N/(rifY�Y//,yfB� { ' Q'NlYiN(Nf, �11 f NIA to rn '\ ,11�IrillAUllilliHAiIHfI11111fIm��flaAl.11lliliHI111111ApiHIIIIHli19 ' � R -nnwwuutwury. IUll�ill{lll;t1111111�Ji1 n�nuini>1 c- t It 1rca. `CmU '\-� tllllli111iAAiliillfi4 a �_ . m, Din_ �IIA�IIIIAIIIilldiifpl o o ILL.`ca y fy twlMuLT Ip iuumlw x -- — =a rt mmstrtttm ul l ,ttZZ Y \ ;4 ` liii lilNflllp{i81ii} y+ .. it /\ 0701 2' � , :JUC1 991 P".C AGt D, , , I. C:7Y OF RANCHO CIJC AMOI+JGA roar orris elox W7,Raneho CCunumga,CallfcYnli 91729,(71U 48 IMI peceRber 8, 1989 Bruce M.-MaVInec• Creative Environs Architects 4382 Brooks Street, Suite A Montclair, CA 91763 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REVIEW 89-105 Dear Mr. finer: Thank you for submitting your proposal for the office/industrial park on ® Arrow highway between the Devore Freeway and Etiwarda Avenue. Please see the attached convents which are provilded to assist you in designing a superior project in Rancho Cucamonga. Should you have any questions regarding this project or if I can be of further assistance,. please do not hesitate to call me fAt (714) Q39-1861. ® Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISIONAtk Steve Ross Assistant Planner SR:mlg k ® Attachments: DEC 11 999L.� ��, t2seatisrc Envrr�ne Cuenrl/mnrkrf r - Meye, William J.Alexander Charles J.Rpquel II City Mcn0g u rr11 1)e� ila r Sluut L1ebb ah N.Brown Aonzia J.Wright )nck Urn,AICP PLIES DEVELOPMENT - PRELIMINARY REVIEW 89-I05 Plannipa Coomments: 4 I. Proposed d us e: se: a. The site is within Subarea 8 of the Industrial Specific Plan, and 1Z zoned for General . Industrial use. Re:nearch and Development is' a permitted use, however. Administrative and Office uses will require a Conditional Use Permit. 2. Sift. plan: ® a. Tie %ite is within t116 _.�ha!ata ill i hog. IGirculation €Teen$„Ai �gq P , . it. ref6re= an exns�ve tic "analy�isvll be:'t�gpied. Sea enclosed b. The proposed plan aptrear5 to be an office park, but the addition of roll-up 60ors mak is it look inrbstrial. If a f coirbination is proposed, the two uses should be made to function together in a sensible manner. For instance, having f, a 'beautiful, landscape plaza next to roll-up doors is a conflict which should be eliminated. If roll-up doors will be part of the project, they should be relocateot to the alley between the buildings.;wK-re thE,,wili be screened. Trucks should not be accessing the loading area by way of the plaza, although the south side of the site does not make a great access either'. c. There should be more of a connection between the plaza and the north side of Buildings 2 and3. This would have a secondary o entrance on the north side of the buildings. In addition, enhanced paving materials such as interlocking concrete Pavers, should run between the plaza and the buildings. The loading area between the buildings should be screened from public view. Truck access should probably not be alloyed at is part of the site. d. The overall circulation of the site should be simplified. Trucks don't have any clear ap$ easy access to the loading area. Automobile access seem; adequate, although it lo&,s confusing. PLIES DEVELOPMENT Pe931Q5 Page g Engineer!.. Comments: 1. All appli�,ab.s conditions of approval for Tentative Parcel Map 9326 will be repeated for design review or, t►u, site. Satisfy tion of the conditions by others Will render any duplicated conditions void upon their completion and acceptance ;by the City, these will Include: I a. In-lieu fees for utilities undergrounding on Arrow Route; b. Construction of the master plan storm drain within Arrow Rou to; c. Design and construction of an interim retention ® building permits are issued prior to conpletion of Day Creek Channel improvements south of Arrow Route; and i d. Dedication of all applicable easema( 2. An amendment to the Tentative Parcel ,,a,.' shall be processed with the design review to ailow combination of Lots 13 with 14; 15 with 16, and 27 with 28. If`Joint use driveway locations are to be revised, then the conceptuar',mdster plan will require rEvision as 3. The curves within Commerce Parkway East and West ,shall begin a � minitum of 100 feet north of the Arrow Route curb 'returns. The ® reversing curves shall have the same radius (300 feet n1inimum) and be separated by IOJ feet of: tangent:. Refer to Special Condition � No 8 of Parcel Map 9326, 4. Enhanced pavement within the public right-of-way shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: interlocking pavers of high strength concrete, 5. There is no median on Arrow Route. 6. Driveways on Commerce Parkway East and West shall align across the street or be offset by 150 feet (Isee-:at'tached '-'Driveway Poli(V!'o. Driveways shall be perpendicular to the street (radial on curves) and avoid the inside of curves. 7. Show lines of sight for all intersections and project driveways on, the landscape and grading plans per attached draft Standard ' No. 413. 8. Addacent structures and pavement to ':le east shall be shown on the site and grading plans. 'j PLIES OEVELOPMENT tl PR 89-1,05 l Page 2 e. The two entrances north of Building 2 on Commerce Parkway East, should bye %mbined into a main entrance for the project with reciprocal access for the property, to the north along the property line. A similar entrance should be provided on Commerce Parkv:ay West. f. No median islaii� is planned for Arrow Highway. g. larking stall dimensions are 9' x IS with a one foot overhang ; allowed for standard, spaces. Compact spaces are 8' `x 161, `with no overhang allowed. 3. Architecture a. The architecture is interesting. It incorporates reflective glass, flut'l� concrete panels, and accent reveals. There seems to be`quite a-bit of texture and'shadoit Aines. -I feel that the variety of materials and textures �ay` be along the lines of what 02 Planning Commission i,', looking for. However, 'td!d #ional attention to the elevat'cuh3 is needed, such as morer clearly defining the wilding en Iies. 4. Landscaping: a. The landscaping plan appears to be adequate, but a table will be required to summarize compliance with the following requirements..- One (1) tree per three paric' ng stalls One (i) tree p.r 30 linear feet t':property boundary one (1) tree per, 30 linear fist of building frontage One`(1) tree per 20 linear feet of street'frontage A minimum of 12% of the net lot area is required to be �► landscaped. 5. Submittal requirements; Be sure to comply with the attached Submittal Requirements, The project site and its part of the master plan proposal should be Eg well defined. Bu-c'<•-+,ings adjacent to the site of 'future phases should be shaded or ,town with clear indications that they are not a part of the proposed project o `PLIES DEVELOPMMT PR B9-1 45 Page 4 9. 'Provide cross-sections for, the "north project boundary on the radirg plan. Extend Section D-D through the existing pavement on he property to the east. Building. and Safety_ Comments: ?. All plans shalt be drawn on uniform size sheet:. 7o larger than 2411 x 36". Excepf,ion: 3411 x 42" scoeptahle for preliminary;drawings. 2. Future building and phases shown an site plan should be ghosted in for elevation match up on grad9ng plan. 3. Grading plan does not confor"with requiremeras. 1 0` ✓ i �• i 'y Y I I� r� m • 13 FO_NTANA STEEL � � Lo IL i ` m o 6 N O � � A OU CD N cuCN F -- .La .0 RESOLUTION NO. 89-070 j i$ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-01, REQU£STINO TO MODIFY THE REGION.'►Te RELATED COMMERCEAL LAND USE OPTION FROM APN- 229-021-S9 AND 229-031-iSt AND SHOW ACCESS POINTS FOR ,THE BLOCK BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE NORTH, ARROW ROUTE ON TH£ SOUTH, 1-IF FREEWAY ON THE WEST, AND ETIWANDA AVENUE ON THE EAST, NECESSITATED BY A PROPOSED MWD POWER {` GENERATING PLANT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANUA AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFO&IIA The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows3 A. Recitals, -� (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application Coe Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-01 .as described in the title of this Resolution, fiereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application". (Li) On 2Eth of Vanu&vy., 1989, the Planning Commieyion-of *he City -� of Rancho Cucamonga Conducted E duly noticed public hearing on the ap:iicaticny Mid (iii) On the 13th of February, 1989, the city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing, concluded said hearing on that dater and ;heard and considered the Planning Commission ® recommendation of approval/ and (iv) All legal prerequieit;4s to the adoption of thin Resolution have occurred. B• $geolution. NOW, TNERE80RE, the City Counoil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follower 1. Thin Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts eat forth in thn P�gcitals, Part "A',, cf this Resolution are true and correct. - 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referencad public hearings including written and oral staff reports,- this Council hereby specifically finds as followsc (a) The proposed MWD,power generating plant at the northwest corner ® of Arrow Route and'Etiwanda Avenue necessitates modification of the access provided the light industrial parcels on the acuthariy part of subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 'Since theme parcels also contain Resolution No. 89-070 F ® Page 2 a land use. option to develop as regional related commercial, access options are proposed which are dependent on which land uce develops, as shown on the attached Vahibitz A'and B. (0) The property to the north of the subje.t site is designated Regional Related Commercial usage. The property to the west is designated I-SS Freeway. The property to the east in designated Community Commercicl and residential. The ,property to the south iet designated General Industriall and (c) The application does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the. General Plat and will provide for development in a manner cor7istent-with the policies and goals'of the General Plan and with related development/ and (d) The application promotes the policiee and goat of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. ; 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dur ag the above-raferunced public hearings and"upon the spec"t.c findings of facts not forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Council 'i Eby finds and concludes as followma I (a) The application does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the Foothill Boulevard SpeciA%z Plan) and ® (b) The application promotes the goals of the Foothill Boulevard Spncific Plan. 4. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the application has barn reviewed and considered in oomplianue with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and adopts a Nagativa Declaration S. Based upon the findings and conclust"is sat forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3,. and 4'above,' the City Council e1 the City of Ranoho Cucamonga, california, on the 15th day of February,, '1989, '3iereby approves' Foothill- Boulevard specific Plan Amendment-89-01. 6. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clark is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law. I PASSED, APPP.OVED, and ADOPTED this lot day of March, 1989. AXE Alsxandsr, Sown, Buquet, stout, Wright NOES., None ABSENTt Non® J / ® Resolution No. e9-070 l� Paga '3 ATTEST: 1 w 7 Sa-arly A, Authelet, 'City Clerk ® I, SIVERLY A. RUTH$LETe CITY CLERIC of the City of Rancho Cucamangay California, do hereby-certify that the foregoing Resolution was, duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City council.-at 'the-City of 'Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council "Id on the lot day of Earth;, 1989. Executed this 2nd_day of March, 1989 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. r � Beverly .: Authulot, City Clerk if ,4. uj dI I' a. ' of ,4 a _a �y a n a a�j 013 da -a Lzj • MAP, motel ® I • fie; + �7P, ® 010-68 'OR UOT4hTOSOU • .1 Aba ViN1-rV� �i.�t•. NI vxr. ..r. Page 4 7d ef, ccis LU - � 8 cc CL ,2 - Cn� � �w g� q s n ® 4 CL a` a A Q 1 w va a e ! s ci4 s i � to t$u r a X a la a 0 R New' Peoe IV-9.51 CIT JF RANCHG CUCAMONGA _ STAFF REPORT DATE: January 25, 1989 TO: Chairasan•and Members of the Planning,:;mission O FRDM: Will law J. Silva, Deputy City Engineer BY: Chuck Mackey, Associate Civil Engineer f -r : SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMCNDMENT request to ion y E—loc&T Jj streetr circulation pattern within subarea 8, located north of Arrow Route, between the I-15 Freeway and Etirian4a Avenue, necessitated by a proposed Mi(D power generating plant at the northwest corner of �.. Etivanda Avenue and. Arrow Route. ENVIRONMENTAL A`..SESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVJMD SPECIFIC PLAN t to modify' e Regional .ate . rc a land use options from APN 229-021-59 and 229-031-15, and show access points for the block bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the north, Arrow Route on the south, I-15 'Freeway on the west, and Etiwanda Avenue on the Fast. necessitated by a proposed WD power generating plant all. the northwest corner of Etivanda and Arrow. 1. ABSTRACT: These applications request amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan (ISP) and to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (FSP) to change the, proposed local industrial .street system of subarea 8 of the ISP and propose access options for various FSP light industrial parcels which contain a land use option for regional related commercial usage. This action will serve to mitigate the access questions for this area caused by the proposed MND power generating plant at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route and is recommended by staff. LI. LOCATION: The application site is located in the vicinity of Foothill Boulevard, I-15 Freeway, Etiwanda Avenue, and Arrow Route (see Figure A).. North - Regional Related C"wercial and Community Commercial South - Heavy Industrial East - Cotwunity Commercial and Residential, West - 1-15 Freeway ITEms O,P PLANNINGi COMISSION STAFF REPORT ISP 89-0F; FSP-89-01 - Ci:TY of R KHO CUCAli0fd6A p� 99ARY 2a, 19a dI _ ,r-• I11. BACKGROUND: t The decision by the Metropolitan Hater District (M l to build a power ® Cnerating plant at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route has necessitated the re-study of the ISP and the FSP between I-15 and Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route. The ultimate W area will extend northerly approximately 2000 feet from Arrow Route and westerly approximately 2000 feet from Etiwanda, Avenue, as shorn on Figure B. In the FSP, the KwD project will occupy land designated as light Industrial (LI) use. The proposed' local street system must be changed to accormadatE the MND project. This local street system is shown on the ISP map for subarea"8 (Figure C). Shown was a proposed east-west street, Devon and an unnamed proposed street from Arrow Route to Devon extending through the proposed MWO project. Due to the nature of the ® project, these proposed streets cannot be constructed. The proposed street, Devon, ran along the south boundary of the FSP and north boundary of the ISP, Hereby:providing access to the planned industrial use areas. Therefore, the proposed local street system needs to be re-studied. The existing and proposed land uses for the study area are shown on Figure B. Access to the Regionsl Related Commercial (RRC) land use is provided by Foothill Boulevard which is consistent with the FSP. WD can be provided access froze Etivanda Avenue and Arrow Route via driveways. The chemical plant at 12550 Arrow Route.has driveway access from Arrow Route. Parcel. 22902159 (proposed Plies project) fronts Arrow Route1 righ fort of;sue. Howevw land this in both t!�iSP anddFSP. north to the street, Henley, t proposed �, was sho+el ad the ISP subarea � map extending from Arrow Route, to Devon providing, acem to this parcel. Parcel 22903115 and the west half of parcel 22903116 lose access to Etiwanda Avenue by eliminating Devon easterly through the MWD project and to Arrow Route when Devon, to the rest of the MWD project, is eliminated. These pparcels are zoned LI in the FSP. The FSP indicated thAt pat 2303113r, and the north por£ion of parcel 22902159 (proposed Plies O- fth extends north of the ISP-into 'tt� ii� ' 1 for VWW AW c�omerctal uset approprfa . er The propE?,ed Plies project shows Industrial uses only. IV. ANALYSIS: A. Proposed Change to the Future'Local Street System In the condition before the W project, t(1e'industrial uses on the southerly part of the FSP and on the northerly pare of he ISP �} received access by' the pr,opos4d Devon Street. r PLANNING COMISSION +TAFF WORT ` IW 89-01; 'FSP-89-01 -AN£ CITY OF Ha Cv, I0 0! ' PANUARY 25, 1989 . t .' In the after condition, only tlie,�western U, parcels nerd access: The access question is L,mde cr4WIex by the y;raCt that - rem"ning U contains an 'Option for Ini4' amiw,m in ianne � IF tWll this LI is eloped as U4, then ace hould be b di t Bran venue. IF the ..�rce s are ape the access S"u Prat 0te throat a local industrial street system.`' In other words,, the a of aseess - rovia'ed these r eis w en en deve EY asare P ton jditwther_#Wi ,.� In any case, Fenley and,the westerly part of D_von must be replaced by a u Ublt� local industrial street system. This new street system must meet;the following criteria: 1) It cannot terminate in a curl-de�sac longer than 6DO feet. 2) It shall provide adequate access to rarcel 22902159 (the proposed Plies Project). Since parcel 22902159 aierages 1800 t 'feet in depth, a loop street Figure approximately 1200 feet`in depth is proposed, as shown if, If parcels 22903115 and.22903116 develop U in the FSP, then access shall be obtained from the 13P circulation system in tr'_—'0oM of an attached cut-de-sac serving these parcels,; as shoe on,r,ir�+rre E, This proposed cul-de-sac should run up the' wegt property line of parcel 22903116.• � The estimated traffic volumes for parce4s `22902159, 2290315 and 2290316 assumin ^lig4t industrial use are: PR VPD/ PM Peak AN Peak Peak Hr-. Peaakk Hr. Parcel # Acres ]EH/AC AM/AC 1 0 (Y!H) (YPH} 22902159 37 A 51.8 7.4 -7.7 _1In 281, 293 c2903115 10.0 51.+8 7.4 7.7 518 74 77 22903116 5.0 51.a 7.4 7.7 259 ,:" 37 39 (Nest half) TOTAL 2745 392 409 t IPU VItf&.,COMISS2DN1 STAW REPORT` asp �-��; sP 89-01 can+ OF PAWA CLV_Wr.a PASE � 25• Ifa9: The proposed ISP local street Wstem can readily handle this Vol me of traffic. The level of service will. be eery good.; If parce,, 2290311: and/or the northerly part ofdevelop g3 RRL, then access shall btainedpercel fro�a eke 2FSP circulation systeO in the form of private `streets and driVeways by access from Foothill Boulevard and Etwanda Avenue. The FSP, subarea 4 circulation concept plan shows t�-aaayor driveway: ®ccess and median opening to the RRC jand on Foothiy7 'Boulevard- about about half way between Etiwanda Avenue and the 1-15 Freeitay. While other driveways could ba instelied along Foothill Rau9'e�vard;the aid-location would be the,�or focus for developing an adequate Internal circulation systed fSr-t efi a land use. - I I'f parcels` 22903115 and/or the norther; y paw of:225021.39 develop LSIiRCRC,` adequate accgss� d able because to lop as aaster plan ulEM' i'lift"410"ity part o a taro and planning for adequate circulati�. Additionally, MWD is planning to reserve an access ease nt to parcel 2290311E that cr-osses the KWD profes.,t at its northerly 0 boundary from this parcol east to EtiwanTa Avenue. IF this parcel develops LI, adequate public street access._ho.s been planned to this parcel which is the proposed street Arroa.Route. IF this Parcel develops RX, theta this driveW' . t MP& can be:used U access all of the RRC land, includii, \q 229Q?i15`.' This driveway should be designated Joit-usage'-w " .Z and FW projects,. i to insure adequate driveway spacing along u ur'adequate access on Etlwanda Avenue., The optional access for RRC land use option is shaven on sigure F. Proposed Chanaes Tharefort the following changes and options are recomended ISP: 1. Delete Devon, Henley, -id the unnamed proposed street fray the ISP, subarea S. Add the proposed local loop street s,Vetom north of Arrow Routs- as discussed, shown on Figure D. S '" - PLANNING2 MMISSION STAFF REPORT ISP 69-01; FSP 89-01 • CITK OF RAK40 COCEti HGA JANUARY P 5 25, 1939 ISP and FSP: i Option a) If parcels 22903115 and/or 22903116 located in the FSP develop as LI usagq., then•access Sha11 be taken ® from the proposed ISP ,'t '`1 1000 street system in ;2) above as cul-de-sac P on Figure E. exceed 600 feet as shown Option b) If parcels 22903115, 22903116 and/or the northerly half of 22902169 located is the FSP develop as RRC ® usage. then access shall be taken fry tMe,'proposed FSP accesses profid`3d along, Foothill Boule4ard and Etiwanda Avenue at Down on Additionally,, if the north part of parce'r,22902158 de'velopa=�,= , thV RRG project shall be' designed to allow ohl see vehicles access frog the,ISi loop streets. ® The intent of �4 .3 and b is to insures that RRC access is obtained from+ < I Boulevard and Eti:adnda Avenue and that LI access is n`' ainE_,'Prom' Arrow'Route via the loop- street. if parcels detvlcp different land uses, their access will be determined by the type of land use developed.as defi.% above. ® V. ENVIRONMENTAL: In conjunction with the application. an Initial Study/Prel Iminary Environmental Assessn*nt, in confemlty with the requiremeats of the California Environmental Quality Act has been prepared and the proposal would have no significant adverse effect, on the environment. Therefore, (® the Planning Comission,any mske a finding of no significant impact on- the 6#10ronment and recoa;m:nd certification of a Negative Declaration. I VI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: a) The amendment does not Confli ct ct wi th the ci rculation real� ation pol.fees of . the Industrial Area Specific Plan or of the Foothill Specii;r:Plan; and b) The w. en¢aent promotes the goals of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and c) The amendment would not be materially Injurious or ci °.riauntal to the adjacent properties, r 2�k PLANNING COMISSION STAFF xPon ISP 89-01; FSP 69-01 - CITY OF i€W;e eqCNONGA PANEJANUARY 6 25, 1 ' n VII. RECMVENDA4TION: Staff recoweends publ'ie hearing discussion,of the proposed Industrial Ares Specific Plan and Foothill Boj0evard Specific lan Amendment. If the Plannirg Commission agrees with the above Analysis and Frcts For Finding, the Planning Commission should "opt. the attached resolutions ih support of the aneendment to the Industrial 'Area Specific Man and aoendment to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. ' D-•spectfully submftted, William J. Sllva, P.E. Deputy City Engineer 6$ RHM:CN:sd Attachaeents: Figure A - vicinity Mp Figure B - Proposed and Existing Land Use Figure C - ISP Subarea EI Figure D - Proposed Street System for ISP Figure f - Proposed Acce'ss Option for Parcels 22903115 and 22903i16 if developed is Light Industries Figure F - Proposed Access Option for..Arcels 22903113,`,,:. 22903116 and Northerly ParS'of 229-2159. if developed as Reglaftl Related' o ercial i r ei 1? !a a 1 •8►, it o ` ;3AI atltl3N7 0 LL toll '� I• Q 4 • ® Nli Y s V r iC I. lu OI v ;t1 �� 3.. YONYAIld3 of I k3AY. i131T3Napy 1 ,.¢ .`.•�•!/. �, 11 y creams •i.•tit 1 fa ,a �s ((( j R.d. 11 y'7 Y@s `OC cgi$a a YSQN83N 1 •—w fr ho p,0 It c •F J A .7 •'a ,y�.A4 IiYIT3NYt7 �3A/DYVIX A JN iA a x Y�NONY�n� Ic Cd ILI cam'• i �� •-� F�q F � ® o �� a !4� `, ,o to .Q O 9 31rav3AY i87?fi3• ® os IWFA 0 • v �t 1 auj �• ..�®® 7s11 ®/ ^, ^�7 LU ILM ®� c,y�s 111PE F ' ;�`��'�■CAM �`�.� ` -` TT Y' yattsxr a ,MIA !q L> _ � Y •s Xs -II of ON 0e I q f LL �§ Q Q� q Q! v ®� ®; p 4 p a q toy U � 13 L pi o pq ©� f� p �e®gym®Q® -----_-----®® A®; 'wiJl'ti vi�ilorl 138 . to 0 a 13 0 j�(. 1✓•JI�Q�� El'mCAdm000FdSI6'Od`IBOLdCd'6a' , �® cc ® db r ® LLL. - a ® e CL 13 Z n W ® � ® x, a N N 1 in UJ ® ;cc a a 13 an cc q In ®�, y s0. c ® � P'4�L.0 1 n�--- — -a__._ _ _ •--�-- _. � sr..rsos�at2r�a.�$-rrtsrir�a-a�scr`e-srbb.Yr.'F�o2��T� 1 (I� 0�C3®EtRHpR9QR[q° W. ®0 $ LU ®Q �® E F Q 4 ll• Ile ° ct• 0 ®� ®o ®: h ° h ©• Q as 13 J e ai 1 at 13, �... � � �racr�a rrrareror�f�r©orssrvcacccr.��r_ ,. CC Ste° �'® • o 0 co rl o a td La �rco CM It O i ez w �oop sf • o®osr • 't M ce®aQ�1!'mINS �• �o • 1 ®6 1�p v .a w in ® ^�, 9 RA ! �• N ® Ss �V ® vj cm CL cm N U. ®/ ° to o UJ ® UJ ®�® e i ®a oIle CL cc K • �; j �ijSw s� ° . RESOLUTION No. ® A L DLUTIOH OF THE PLANNING GOMISSIOH OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRJNMENT ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL!`A-VECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-01. REQUESTING TO MDDIFY Tft'LOCAL STREET CIRCULATION PATTERN' FITHIN SUBAREA 8, LOCATED NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE, BETWEEN THE I-15 FREEWAY Ak,0 ETIWANDA AVENUE, NECESSITATED BY A PROPOSED mwD POWE;2'`3ENERATIhf PLANT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETINANDA\AYEHUE AND ARROW ROUTE IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. 't4ND 14AKING =FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF , j �. A. _Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho CJcamon a W\ filed an application for Industrial Area Specific fran-Amend%ent No. 8 -01 ai described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as `the application-. (i`i) On January 25, 1989, the Planning, Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (III) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is 'hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning COMMISsion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: set forth Inthe Recitalssion s, art 4t o thiscRe olution are true and finds that all of co recta 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 25, 1989,. including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this COMission herebyspecifically p y finds as foci somrs: a) The proposed M O power ggenerating plant at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue necessitates modification of the proposed legal industrial street system. Therefore, public access requirements necessitate the modification of said local system as shown on the attached figures. b) The pproperty north of the subject site is designated Light Industrial with an optional Regional Related Commercial usage. The Property to the west is the I-IS Freeway. The property to the east Is designated Comemunity COWercial AnC Residential. The property to the South is designated Heavy Commarcia ,, and t1.ANNIM COMISSION RESOLuflov W. ISP 89-01 - CITY OF RAKHO CUCAMOk6I1 , JANUARY 25. 1989 PAGE 2 C) This amendment !'does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan aAd'will provide for development. within the district. in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This.':. endment does promote the goals and objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan,, #nd e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or .detrimental to the adjacent properties and woeld not have a ^significant impact on the environment nor the surroc:,,ding properties and that a negative declaration be issued. 3. Based upon the substan4al evidence presented to this Cowmission during the above-referenced public Hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) The amendment does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and 4 b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; anti c) That the proposed amendment is In conformance with the General`Plan; and d) The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Commission hereby finds'that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the Ca"fornia dnvironmental Quality Act of 1970 and further this Commission 'recommends the issuance of a Negative Declaration by the City Council. 5. Based upon the ,findings and conclusions•set forth in paragraph 1, 2. 3, and 4 above, this Coax®ission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65650 to 65856 of the California Governawnt Code, that the Planning Co®ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of January, 1969, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-01. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. �•, VLANNIHG COWISSIQ* RESOLUTION w1Do 'ISP 89-01 - CITY W RMCHD CUCAMM JAGSUW 26. 1909 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989. PLANNING COWISSION DF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA /r BY: Larry T. McNiel, a rman,, p� ATTEST:• Brad u er,,_becretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Cvty of lancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the forming 'Resolutir—"—e duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning,0.`p+aission of the City 1of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning casioe� held on .the 25th day of January, 1SB9;by the following vote-to-wit:" AYES: COMMISSIONERS: l I' NOES: COMMISSIONEERS: , ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Lt IA 9 Q a F11 ' �� m r 4i i`'I� mmmsmmmmmsmmimmim®mms Qom_. r � �a � U 13 10 CA m � ���s�avaaaa�®.►saov�.®vaaoa9o�'ia C Qs(sys� ti � E] p a � �a d •i13� ! t� i AIM .� mmmmsmmmm.®mmammmmmm 1 �a 0 1 h, Ito 14 n f �a ,` a` \Q 99 3 a ® i caw 110 to �Qs®®sa�w�aaa® 2,t�.�;gc.�►„C.I.SIsstJsaE�r�.rsvr�,ao.�risrt,�+��asro ^� ��_.i►�1 ie�e-� �i°�- !tee s aoq A n ®a `°®� ® � "D ® I �. 8pip a ! a 1 �6 RESOLUTION no A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAA%ING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMdONGA, CALIFORNIA. RECWNDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENT AssESSNEHT AM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-01, REQUESTING TO MODIFY THE REGIONAL RELATED CRCIAL LAND USE OPTION FROM APN: 229-02149 e AND 229-031.15, AND SHOD" ACCESS POINTS FOR THE'BLOCK BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL SOULEVARO ON THE NOPYH, ARROW ROUTE ON THE SOUTH, I-15 FREEWAY ON THE NEST, AND ETIWANDA 1 AVENUE ON THE EAST, NECESSITATED BY A PROPOSED NWD POWER ° GENERATING PLANT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 'ETIWAHD:A AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE IN RANChb CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 6i) �. A. Recitals. (1) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-01 as described in the title 0 of this Resolution. hereinafter in this Resolution, the 'sub'ect Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment it, referred to as "the application% (if) On January 25, 1969. the Planning Coe:.aission of the Cijr of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (i11) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and eesolved by the 0 PlanningCc-mission of the City of Pinch® Cucamonga as follows: 1. Thfs Comoission hereb, specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recita;s, Part "A , of this Resolution are true and correct. r. Based upon sebstantial evidence presented to this Commission ® during the abcve-referenced public hearing on January 25, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together w1th Public te3timany, this Comission hereby;specifically finds as follows: a) The proposed MO power enera:.aq plant at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Et1wanda Avenue Oftessitates modification ;;. of the access provided the tight industrial parcels on the southerly part of subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Since these parcels also contain 4 land use option to develop as regional related comrcial, access options are proposed which are dependent on which hand use develops, as-shown an the attached figures; and `.v3 r PLANNIM" CMISSION-RESQLUTY(w1. ® FSP 89-01 - CM OF RAMCHO ' AHGA JAMUARV 25, 1989 PAGE 2 b) The property north of the subject site Is designated Regional Related Comercial usage. The property to the wrest is designated the I-15 Fre_weay. The property to the east is designated Community Commercial and Residential. The property to the south is designated General Industrial; and C) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development. within the district, in a Banner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment does promote the gals and objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and e) This amendment would not be emterially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would tat have a significant impact on the environwnt nor the surrounding properties and that a negative declaration be issued. ® 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing a:3d upon the specific findings of facts set forth 1n paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) The aiwmdaent does not conflict with the Circulation policies ® of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and W The a ndeent proemtes the goals Fif the Circulation Element Of theta foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and C) That the proposed amendeera is in conforaeance with the General Plan; and d) The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Comaissiean hereby finds that the project has bean reviewed }nryy and considered for `ompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and further this Comission recomoiend` the issuance of a Negative *, Declaration by the City Council. 5. Based capon the findings and Conclusions sat forth in paragraph 1. 2. 3. and 6 above, this CoMission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section _ 65850 to 65855 of the CAliPArnis Government Codu, that the Planning Co®ission ` .0f the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends spptoval an the 25th day ow' January, 1999, FOotMll Boulevard Specific Plan Ammends+ent lima. W01. S. The Deputy Secretary io this CoMission shalt Cae't9Ty to the E. eedoption of thin Resolut'gn. ® ,� r i PLANNING CaMissION WSOLUTION no. _f bdli MY CF l01ta W JA MW 3 16s 19�. APP�4YED;AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH'DAY OF JANUARY PLANNING COMISSION 'OF THE CITY CF RANCHO CUCftNGA gY: arry T. FEMIel, Cha 4wssn ATTEST: c ® Urdu Puller.,Secretary i I, grad Buller, Secretaryy of the Planning Commission of the MY of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cePtify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularlly intrduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning ComIssion of the o ® City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular seating of the Planning,C fission held on the 25th y of January. 1989 by the'folIoWfng vote-to-nit: AYES: COWISS70NERS: NOES: C"ISSIONERS: ® ABSENT: C"ISSIONERS: ® J d$ ® .rsoaiai�iBtrrA.r�-arr r1►�"r��dr ��cg-�„ LU uj ° C1 In m° ®e Q n p4 ©i U o T oo rt ° _ n: y .rMe E3 rlo i. 0 p S TWO am © "sesos H ssesrs®oswiss�®cr�rer�w�ocosc,� CC 0If ®, y !� M13o � z � __..�® tip wv �� N e�lllaw ®� I ,�`; a w CY � . ®®�' . p° O ®us N ISMIfr _ tam. LL i° �m �10 ®e O NO ¢!® ®. q�p S _ Y � � rn iwas I � � !i®®vim° sr®vvvrvvs®v�o_rezvv�.>•vvsvvsis CY J 0 cm 04 uj U. f • IX ., p� w ` CL ® ,, AN: a cm ®� �. LU 1 r® W ot e '�' r, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT `' \ CUP'90-37 -`THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 19f'i Page ;f B. ;lurroundina Land Use and 2onij North --,Mixed use; Foothil'L Doulevazd Specific Plan (Subarea 4 - Regional Related C=mercial and Community Commercial) Pouth '- -Water transmissiod'facility, industrial plant and vacant; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 8 General Industrial) East - Vacant and Single Family Residential; Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4 - Community Commercial) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Interstate 15 and vacant; Victoria Planned Community, (Regional Related Commercial) . C. -General Plan Designationsz Project Site Commercial and Industrial Park 1�1 North Commercial South General Industrial East Commercial, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West Commercial D. Site Characteristics: The site contains several unique elements ®' indicative of the Etiwanda area and the Route 66 Corridor during the 1920s through the 19609. The site was the host of the Cucamonga Top Winery and contains the rema ;s of ,the winery 'complex, with its grape crusher, cistern, loading-dock,-access Dry,buildings, Craftsman home occupied by`the winery owners (the Gmaideras), and a small store used for selling wine. A second Craftsman-style residence is located to the east of the Cucamonga Top Winery complex and was owned by another wine-making family (the DiCarlos) of the area. The eastern-moat structure On the site is an old gas Station which'' contained restaurant space as part of the'service_operation. The gas station has since been con7erted to a bod•,shop. Also characteristic of the Route 66 Corridor, approxima el",,L, wo-thirds of the street frontage along Foothill Boulevard con" ina a double row of Eucalyptus trees. The balance of the site contains grape vineyards and is undeveloped. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of TS' Square Parking. Spaced Spaces of Use Footage FazioRequired Provided Price Club 111,325 1/220 506 821 Wal-Mart 155,584 1/220 707 808 (ultimate) Gas Station 3 5 Restaurant 61000 1/100 60 60 6,060 1/55' 109 109 Fast Food 10,174 1/75 136 147 Retail 282,894 1/220 1,286 1,291 2807 3,241 jf CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGk STAFF REPORT DATE: Juno 26 . 1991. TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad cuiier,^City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND L700THILL BOULEVARD- SPECIFIC, PLAN AMENDMENT 93-04 - THE WATTS-ON COMPANY -A request to modify the j median break location on Foothill Boulevard, to add a 'median break location on Foothill Boulevardp,-and to change the land use designation from Light Industrial to i.,'gional Related Commercial for an area of approximately 26 acres within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4), located on the east aide of ® Interstate 15, south of Foothill Boulevard. These requests are 05 in conjunction with the development of a 160 acre Qr retail/commercial center located on the south sfae of Foothill Boulevard between I-15 and Etiaanda Avenue - RPH: 229-031-03 Jt through 13, 15, 16, and 20. Staff secomeends issuance of a Negative Declaration, Related Files: Conditional Use Permit ® 90-37 and Tentative parcel Map 13724. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-37 THE WATTSON COMPANY - A request for master plan approval of a t60 acre retail commercial center containing.approximately, 550,000- square feet of leasable space and a request for approval of conceptual site plan and building'elevations for"the Price Club facility in the Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial desicr iticne of tt:� Zoothil2 Boulevard Specific Plan (Supa;:ea 4), located on the south side of Foothill, Boulevard between Interstate 15 and Stiwanda Avenue- APR: 229-031-03 through-13, 15, 16, and'20. Staff reccasends issuance of a Negative Dsclasatio�lated Filea: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan ® Amoa3aent 90-04 and Tentative Parcel Map 13724. Asnociated with the projcct in Tree Removal Permit 91-24. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: ® A. Action Requested: L Approval of a conceptual Mastar Plan, and a> specific Site Plan and Building Elevations for the Price Club facility,< issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration for Conditional Use Permit 90-37, and recomendation of approval to the City Council for Environmental Assessment and Foothill Boulevard Specific.Plan Amendment-90-q_4. ITEMS J,6 K PLANNING COMMIiyiON STAFF REPORT ^� CUP 90-37 - THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 4 ti circulation of the future Regional Re.,ated Commercial use \ rnort side of Foothill Boulevard. Based upon review of the «v information, the new location will be able to serve the suture development. Letters have also been sent to the existing property owners notifying them of the proposed change in location. Comments have- been received from the 'church expressing their agreement with the new location. 2. New Median Break: As part of the ( 'velopcent of the site, the applicant is proposing a left-turn on `.median brrtit'betweer the freeway off-ramp and the main signalized intersection for the project. Because of the unusual configuracion and depth of the �i southwest portion of the site, the applicant feels that the left-turn, median break is necessary to provide adequate circulation for the project. This issue was addressed in the traffic study prepared for the site and has zet concurrence with the City's Traffic Engineer. -Additionally, favorable comments have been received from Caltrans for the admL=oaal median break. 3. Changes in Zoning Designation: Under the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan, the southern and southwestern portions of the site were designated Light Industrial with the southwest portion of the sire being considered for a Regional Related Commercial use through the submittal and approval of a master plan. With the submittal of the master plan for the retail/commercial center, the applicant is now requesting that the zoning designation be changed consistent with their proposal. There is, however, a small area within the project site that. was not originally considered as a potential Regional Relatod Commercial use. The area in the approximate location of the Wal-Mart building is designated as Light Industrial. :With the Big Three Industries located to the south and the Metropolitan Water District facility located immedintoly to ,the east, this area would remain an isolated Light Inc..Otrial pocket. In that the applicant has submitted a master plan showing a commercial use of the entire area, staff .feels it is appropgjate to consider ea ' change in the sorting from Light Industrial Ld Regional Related Commrcial consist^nt with the balance of the projer 1 ' D. Desist Review Committee: This project has been the aub,.b2 o five [ planning Cossaission worshops. The format of these workshops was set up to review specific aspects of the project. The first workshop focused on major site planning issues. The second'workshop provided direction for the architecture of the center and the Price Club facility. The third workshops considered revisions to the site plan for the entire site and the architectural concept .for the,shops for the eastern and western ends of the proj ,cts (excluding the free-standing buildings). The fourth work�ibnr centered on the conceptual site plan and building elevations for t1.- Price Club and finally, the fifth- Planning Commission workshy cgnaidered the overall master`p an for the a to PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF R5PORT CUP 90-37 THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, + 91 - Page 3 II. ANALYSIS- A- Master :Plan: .The applicant is proposing to develop a. t60 acre retail/commercial center consisting of approximately 520,000 square feet of retail space, 22,000 square feet of restaurant/fast food use, and a aervice station. The center is proposed to be anchored by a Price Club and a Wal-Mart. At tht,s. preliminary stage, the far western portion of the sic---is planned for four major tenants f' ranging--in size from 17,500 square feet to 22,000 square feet, 2b,000 square feet of shop space for smaller users,_ a 6,150 square foot%retail pad, and a 12,000 square foot restaurant pad. The far eastern portion of the site contains a 50,000 square foot supermarket and three major tenants, ranging '.n size from 22,000 to e, 26,000 square feet, and t37,350 square feet of shop space. In addition, three retail pads, four drive-thru pads, and a service station are proposed along the Foothill Boulevard street frontage., '- The Master Plan depicts basic building, parking, and circulation "@ aisle locations within the project. Specific desian for each budding, or series of buildings (except Price Club), will be subject to separate Development Rev ew oY Con' tional Use Permit applications (as required by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan). Sac*d 19d' a4•ietiRt' comltreation. uAth the •,applicant, cIi #os a ally the �$ chwe anges a will r These 2t�a�aof�'tF3s ® ast ''�'" vithsa � B. Price Club: The applicant has submitted a site plan and building elevations for a 111,325 square foot Price Club 'facility. The -� building is proposed as a free-,standing structu2ta on a 12.2 acre r parcel, generally located in the cents:.: portion of the project. ' The northeast corner of the building will be devoted to the sale and installation of tires. The rk a v nrev r-the Price Club is _just under one and one-half tizma_ `1e Coda rea�uirement. Additional parking is based or the Ricer drU 94 expar ewe and needs of ® existing facilities in order to accommodate the influx of customers especially at peak times (Christmas). C. Footbsll aoulavard Specific Plan Amendment: —� 1. Median break location: With the development of the center, the t` applicant will be constructing a signalized intersection midway between Etiwanda Avenue and try^;_interstate 15 Freeway. The o 13 however, has. 'Z shifted a proximately .20 set to the -seat o eloeatic oothtl H`ou evar S c Flan. This proposed location w e selected, no on X to provide access to the subject mite, but also to line up with the existing driveway for the church on the north side of 'Foothill Boulevard. Additionally, the applicant has prepared a conceptual master plan and traffii7, analysis to .evaluate the Q PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 - THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 6 f. The compact parking spaces provided by the applicant were accepteflle for the following reaso}s5 1) The mpac parking within the Wal-Mart area was in, addico n to those spaces required under the Development Code. Standard spaces have been provided to meet the Code ;requirement for parking stalls. 2) Compa �,.spaces"provided`1for the eastern portion of the site exceed current Codt standards, they are the same widt;i as standard stalls 19 feet) and are 1 foot longer than compact stalls (17 feet versus 16 feet). Undas_ ®' the Development Code, a 1- foot overhang is permitted for standard stalls and the proposal would only result in a 1 foot reduction, of a standard stall. If, however, the applicant proposes to alter or modify the design of the parking area in the eastern portion of the site, the standards in place sat the time of the proposed revision must be complied with. g. P'kds along the sensitive to the visibilit from th fre a` Buildings shoo not be or anted with their backs t& the freeway and sufficient, architecturally designed, roof-mottted screening should be provided. E. Historic Preservation Commission: Age noted under the Site Characteristics section, of the staff report, the project location contains the remains of a family owned ariu operated winery and a filling station characteristic of the 1920s through the V's0s. The complex represents a historic period, style, and way of fife which is becoming more and more rare in the City. Because,t._`-Its historic significance, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the site for possible Local Landmark Designation. In considering the site, the Historic Preservation Commission felt that a Local Landmark Designation vould not be appropriate. This decision 'was based an the fact that the site has been significantly altered and destroyed to a point. where zacomtaanding Landmark Designation over] owner objection was not aex,ited The Historic Preservation Cosmission. Bide Weaver, feel that the` history of the area should be in same - way commemorated. Ads a result, the Historic Preservation Commission recomended Fpproval of the site as a point of interest to the City Council subject to a series of mitigation measures. The City Council' subsequently approved the Resolution with the following mitigations: 1r The project _owner shall sponsor 'a City approved Oral History Program of, the pioneering/wine-making, families of the subject area.: U PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 1, CUP 90-37 - THE WATTSON COMPANYi June 26, 1991 Page 5 1. Price Club: On May 16, 1991, the Planning Commissicn considered the conceptual site plan and building-elevations for the Price Club facility. At that Lime, the :Commission recommended approval of the plans subject to the elimination of the tile roof elements over the main entry and providing 'sz flat roof design consistent with that shown for the tire caster entry. The plans for the Price Club have since been revise(, consistent with the Planning Commission's direction—, Q 2. Master Plan: On June G, 1991, the, Plannin�Com—missi-nreviewed .the overall m8 ter plan nr the projehe oT+IDssB n0no recommended approva_1 of tha protect aa ollow g a. The design of Pad 8 was not acceptable in that sufficient stacking distance was not provided for the fast food restaurant. The plan should be revised to provide a design that is feasible for development. b. The design of Majors 5-8 aitd Shop G is ' l acceptable. Variation should be provided in the buil:6in4 footprints, elevation fenest—tion, and building heights with future submittals. c. the Commission noted that provisions, other than the two fast food restaurants, were not made for restaurant users within the eastern portion of the sits. If the applicant is proposing additional restaurant users, adjustments will have to be made in the square footage of the buildings to ensure adequate parkilg is provided, as required by the Development Code, d. Site amenities should be provided across tae site tolip 'the various elements of the project. A hierarchy of site amenities should be provided to physically and visually link ® elements across the site. The primary :emphasis of this hierarchy should be along the north/south drive aisles. The exact .:elmants and extent of the amenities should be xavievId by the Pla.:ruing Commission. The hierarchy might inclua_y such elements as building foca3 points, kiosks, tsellUss, seating areas/benches, colored/textured walkways, ® signage, street furniture, and landscaping. e. ;The applicant should submit architectural der 7Fls and elements to be reviewed and approved by the `Planning Commission W establish an architectural vocabulary to be used,as_ the basis for design of future buildings within c:;e center. n J!/<- t PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 - THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 8 a. Foothill Boulevard will be improved with three through lanes on the .youth side of the street, a fully developed median, and two through lanes on the north side of the street. b. Dual left-turn lanes will be provided at the main,entry to the project to accommodate turning movements into the site and to provide for turning movements into the future pk:ject on the north side of Foothill Boulevard. C. Dual left-turn lanes will be provided for eastbound traffic on. Foothill Boulevard turning north onto Etiwanda Avenue. d. Dual left-turn lanes will be provided for traffic heading north on. Etiwanda Avenue and turning westbound on Foothill Boulevard. e. Right-turn lanes will be provided for each driveway along Foothill Boulevard and the northerly driveway on Etiwanda Avenue. f. A left-turn-only median break will be provided at the western-most driveway along Foothill Boulevard in order to access the far southwest corner of the project. 2. Tree Preservation: This site contain:a many mature trees located in basically three areas. A number of mature trees are located around the existing single-family residences and. winery complex. Also, a cluster of trees is located in the southwest portion of the site around what was once the Big Bear Winery. Finally, a double tow of Eucalyptus trees occupies approximately two-thirds of the Foothill. Boulevard frontage. Many of these trees are classified as heritage trees and as such, are subject to the Tree Preservation Ordinance. A Condition of Approval has been included requiring the approval of a Tree Removal Permit _ prior to the issuance of grading permits. An arborist's report shall be prepared in conjunction with the Tree Removal permit to address the, possibility of preservation andlor relocation of existing trees on site. • 3. Cultural Resources: As noted in tha° Historic Preservation Cc"ssion portion of the staff report, there are a number of cultural resources on the site. The Historic Preservation. Commission tookthese issues into consideration in establishing the mitigation measures contained in their Resolution 91-01 (See Exhibit "F"). These mitigation measures have been included in the Resolution of Approval for the master plan. Therefore, although the project could have a significant effect in 'these areas, staff found that there will not be a significant"effect in this ' case because of the mitigation measuxes 'which have been incorporated into the project design ^r included as Cor.-Utions of Approval. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Dot-aration. JI —Ja ,i L' PLANNING COMMISSION',STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 - THE WATTSON COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 7 2. The existing structures shall be 'iocumented fully according to HAESJHAER standards by an architect approved_by-the City. 3. Project owners shall offer to donate the Guidera and DiCarlo " homes over a period of 180 days to persons demonutrating ownership of land within theCity of Rancho Cucamonga suitable for such relocation. The project owners will pay for such relocation 4. The applicant $hall incorporate the familial and architectural past of the area into commissioned public art integral to the architectural design of the. project. This art shall portray southern Etiwanda's wine-making past in a realistic style and the applicant will submit no leas *tan three alternatives, in no less than three different artistic mediums, for the Historic Preservation Commission's review. The final specifications for this architecturally integrated artwork shall be approved by the • Planning Commission. 5. The applicant shall use personal names and those of associative qualities, such as winery names or wine labels, on the project site wherever possible. 6. No demolition permits shall be issued for existing structures within the project site until the issuance of building permits for any new strne-ure. 7. The applicant shall contribute up to $100,090 to establish a fund for the reconstructioc,.of a 2,OOO square >oot barn at the site of the City owned Cha!f2a;j=Marcia house. udtetain local wine industry artifacts will be documented and displayed. Said funds shall be donated prior to the issuance of demolition permits. The design of said structure shall follow the design of the original Chaffay-Garcia barn and its exact,tion shall be subject to review and approval of the Historic Weservation Zommission in the fora of a Landmark Alterat'yn Permit. F. Environaeni-al Assessment: In completing the Initlal Study, staff has iAsntifa.id that there are several potential environmental impacts as a result of the project. These,items includ_.- P 1. Traffic: Because of the unusual configuration of the site and the type of users being considered, including two ,100,000r square fcot users, a trffic study was prepared to address Potential impacts UPI% the ;efts aft suregnF n is report addressed the trip generation from the: site at the various`driveway access points to public streets.'' In addition, the report addressed the impacts of the project at intersectinr..-_: and provided, designs .J,for the ultirate design of 4 intersections. Asa result, the applicant will be`providinq ^ following mitigations FK-- 7 PLANNING cOMMISSION.STAFE REPORT: CUP' 90-37 THE WATTS:,y COMPANY June 26, '19y1 Page 9 iII. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Conditional Use Permit applicatior, is consistent with the General Plan,. the Development Code, and the Pcothill Boulevard Specific Plane The project will not be detrimental :to-'( adjacent properties or cause si ficant environmental moac The -2, proposed uses an site plan, to)pther with the Conditions of Approval, rl�0 are in compliance with the _applicab'i.e provisions of the Foothill t , Boulevard specific Plan, Development Code, and City standards. The � Foothill Boulevard Specific plan Amendment will` provide': for the developmert of a comprehensively planned urban community that i� superior_to the. devehnment otherwise allowahiP under alternative regulations. iae amendment will provide for development of the Specific Plan in a manner which is consistent with the`Genural Plan and with`- `a related e �li�i or Zf ah_e�y. amendment"will provide for the construction,'improtement, and ex 6. .',on of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public ,,zvices required within the Specific Plan. Additionally, the amendment will not � -1 be detrimental to the public health or safety or cause nuisances or Significant +a enoi�nnme�ntal impacts. �j rt , IV. CORRESPONDENCE: These items have been advortised is public hearings in the Inland Valley Daay Bulletin newspaper,-,noticer were sent to all property owners within the subarea of the Specific Plen, and the site was posted. V._ RECOMMENDATION." Staff recomi.aads that t` „z Inning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 90-37, issue a mitigated(Negative Declaration for the Conditional Use Permit, ,>-'-si§EoEm:end approval -o' tnviromr2ntal Assessment and FootY 11_Boulei_.,._:specific Plan Amendment 90-04 ,to the City Council. Respec• • ly submitted, _at Brad ler City lanner ;} BB:SM:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A Site lTtil+s_'-�'-on Plan Exhibit "B" Cone®penal Site Plan r Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "€" - Building Elevation: Exhibit "F" - City Council Resolution No. 91-059 ' Resolution recommending approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-04 Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 90-37 j _ r t ��� ; r, rt f✓ C5 �. `'1 I D w _, --ii _ - MY ®F rrEft zz� rc ®roc `TrrL.E:� cS , PION IO 7�( E rr:,:--&SCALE: -Tj K-13 _ - z 40 /� '• lWOR II YCIOA i KYC`f YIIOR S V rrEK: CPl"Y OF UCAMONGATMLE:PLAN ION ' `tXI�19rrag-z Ste: -------------------- ------- _-_ _ - _- 7. L A lt� t fp, P t �. o I 3 _ 345, .. N: - -- --- - - ____-=-_-_=__=__- 40 J c f( 'C lime l rrEm: 'Jz C17Y OF UCAMONGA TLSLE: 6/ .�. PLAN, ION P14 EXHIISM9-4 SCALE: y F 1 ��e 2'�t.l •F� ',IF t:.�itl�,Illijl��F� ji: 37 a i#itl}il i�i Ittt i7si} es. 7 a V fi , Ay" T� e �vm I sk em Ift �PA Aet re� 1 2j7 rra ' b�yef It eqi� /10.P eorm P e"C l® !,- q f r8 o t �g"trPv+tia tiP"� 6r �I•tPPR1FP. _— 00 it� �� '. _~• rv,�,�,[e,� •a�n4+nw�sa�t +� � ;• �h,.�; `LAC':..t - ®. ;[4P+RW� • t � f.g . . d » v > # . . =tea« %�- :. A. » _ f - � « ■ � « >£ i . fit 1. � � � � §^ ^ _ �y . . ■w f/§^�« ¥ ^ » ■ . : . � : ►i\ #:�. ■\ .y�.��\\ _ ^ � a . f � .� �" ExHmiTs C-3 SCALE- A k '�1�9 i RR�I.fO RR•rRq RR•4fb w�_�„g, RR•/rad` ,¢ ice ik MY UCAMC;.Imo► r+. 1iEI��rr:D-/.SCALlr.: 1 :3/ 2� ''����Ilii1111� ,��`� t-:•�a� '7�%�'�CY��S_�,s� ,� � Illilllilllll yl � _ k .p K; • .l k a IL t .. ,arti^# al — � — �_ �sa-a_i:x•�•��ys-�y-S�. .fir��,J e —7Se —iSc -i. 1 4 R� in vw `Ice n Y 4 f. MY o p , 7 PLAN �I�3 10, Mly +� EXFIINT.40-d SCe1i.E:' � K-Z3 • •as w -. � 2 -•"�:,, � �• !tom\�,i-jj �.. _� ' s A sIL IL 1.14 PLAN F t TON �j IL ri t C I I V f. f� I R RR, - zip � �� •.-. '�, r ... � vr�w-�: �t _ I1 IIJ/qq I \ -2 �° � j'�i..�1'.--i— i1���•--off �L�:d�P � � � •ter- � I F - � ttj► 1'dr Ul ILM1& '-. ,4�..••.?in ` ir I._ t , r �f' J'�I' ins_ •'' W� � � ��_� t'"tl`� PC• '__._j� \ '`4 ,.�� ° � � @�' is v T 1 Q 947 �Sfax y if ]v .1 4 ic IN 1 yet `Yr� �� 1-R+s.rr-r:-*$C'--� t•$ � _"S. °:. °� ,r-.-.. jY 1 S y. .figJ� h_ 8 .l Resolution Nr', 91-059 Page 2 ' Fvidira.2: The proposed Point of Interest is an example of"a type of building which was once ccomon but is now rare. Fact: interpreted She t••,ro houses,remain as testaments to the Craftsman style as . it was in in the area duri»g the 1920s. Such examples are increasingly'rare. E:tiiaated construction of the filling station rates to the late 1910s. L . Pita The prayed Point of Interest is .connected with a busiwess or use which was one ccumon but is now rare. Fact: Wineries, largs and modrst, composed a thriving majority of the Cucamonga/Etiwanda area's businesses and land uses in the era from 1915-1950. 'These once extensive agricultural erterprizes are r-7;idly i appearing froti the larxLecape. ,F'Mth6rmore, roadside filling tations/restaurant. are n, all but obsolete. � r P. Neighborhood aria C rabic �r+in,• Findirc+ is z1u. MvNsed mint of Interest materially brWits the hist=ic c3Luact-1 of the aaighbcz3 Ood Facto These bui lcti up form a:`3arga part ;of the a+mrall sense of place,and past in the area. Elad _: Me proposed Poir_. of Inter st in its location represents an estaili2shed and familiar.,,visual :'nature of the neighborhood, community, or city. ar : CoNd by piamer fMiliQs ,A` ,o®® hmem stayed in the ccmunity, the hcm, .way, " filliM station have long an -stablPshed and viable el omit in,.d*"area. LiMIJ�1Z_a: Tea dies are cn ttfs Gityls hist='=l it toly. Fact: The , aw"m 34s:W thus', ; : "?'d ptoa}lextim rWd out as havingautstanding historical, architecbzal, cu !,Ural, or ass&atic ::i7-dfi , 1 : . 7a area's disruptfon as comed by,,ths ;02 Foott-i'A SMLIMMO, tkA CVWtC=tiM of I&Awstate 1S, and t1W ircreasing cbmlaceim of agriculb=1 uM iW di region has reduces signifJc&nUy the COPam& of thm sfti 1'js. SinocC tra =oposed project calls cut fcc tra demolitiai of,' adl of the ce ming ®, buildings and A devil "ieltial Cbiecticn to any retwttion ae.]aF1c�t _ _ ms, tM ==or W C'Werrid-LM' s ®nee bs . Ms, t= l-bint at Interest Resolution with tilUmticn reommmidaticne re=WAM th: great historical value of the arm as a:+snit and no specific structures. RESOMMON NO. 45-059 A REMOLUMON OF THE CrTY OOIRQI"IL OF THE Wig1 OF RANCHO CUCPMXM, CAUFORNIAr AXPROVING HISMRIC POnM OF MCERMr 91-01., THEREBY DESIGNATI&i 112 C*TMMJ.A GUMERN, AND DICARLD � TES AND 67 7m, LOCATED (� AT 12573, 126-31, 12617, 12675, 12705; '12743, 1.2777, 12801, 12807, 12811, 12821, and 1.2881 F 0TKLLL BOULEVARD AS All i 1SZtIRIC Ponc OF nn'sREST WHEREAS, on December 6, 1990 and January 3, 1991, the',}Hi.storic Preservation Cwmission of the City of Rarer conducted duly,notticed public her-aT qs can the application. a WHEREAS, the City Council has received aM. reviewed all,'/input regarding Said Point of Znt--est designation. ;r WHEREAS, all legal prere$.aisites to the adoption of this Resolution have oomx=ed. ® :told, MEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rmx:ho Mca=QVa dcc% hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: S51L'PIOS7 1: The soplicatign applies to approximately,.62 acres of lard, 'basically,.' It rect:. r canfiguratioh, located alw the south �Ade of Foothill Horde d east of Interstate 15 and west of Rtiwan]a Avenue, AMU: 229-031-03 2= :)h 13. SEM0.1 2: The Proposed Prnint of Litwest meats tt* following criteria established in Cmpter 2.24.090 of the R Mmioipal Code. A. historical. and =tb-al 5igaific a.-=: ZjDaIM z: MW prq=zed Point of L*Arest is p=tVmlarly represen- tative c a histcrie Prod. "tjrVe, style, xegim, _ way of 3`fe.. 2W Dicaric, schiro, CuVanalla, Ellwa, Col nobaro, and adsiva familim fcvwd a-comity basad on dwed cultural back- grcukd, faith, and cf Mvwa:�e v , =n, and children p the grewing.-A and the mmkirgg and eolltnq of wide in the 4MIUM 0=ammp/sauthem Ftivarda region in the 1920's ark, 1930's. Ta h and wintry bdldin s stand as of the'' thriving fa lys a vinicult m = so prevalent in this area_ The O dbasdfiftY." tilling stAtion .is lb*Ad hist�iwny with the small astail ringzics. and h� it lies next to ti-k,** the ,:,es. popular Sara a tim ti=, Rut* 66. The riss of antam tL'.e . Rawl qwn my t4 the parallel dvalcPnit of roadside dirwxs, has snot , and xvsair'sue. at ocs! f itae, this aft=t=s filled -i.: Of them rmft foss travelers as well, as these of the groi.. II'ttcy of'EtitcMb. rr Resolution No. 91-059 Page 4 7) The Project OK= shall emntribut,e up to $100,00p:00 to- y` establish a fundjt for the ,reci6nt tcti= of a i,000 sag foot barn at the sitsI!Of;the city-owned Chaff€grJGarcia h=9e<'wherein lv z1 wine inalustry',artifacts will b1r drjnmwxted yard displayed. 0 The said funds shall be.%kratad demolition prioi, to the issuance 0£ permits. Thrx k5jrji of tnr,:,said structure shall j follow the desigx7:of the original Chaffcxy(Caroia barn and its execution shall in sub;*ct to the review aT val of ttxe;. Historic Presavition Cormission in the form of 'a Lr�:ark Alteration Permit. SECi'LON g: Based R'po�x the fiiAimis and conclusions set ford! in Sections 1, 2 and 3 above, and raceiwd and review#A by U s Cauxcil. BE IT-.FUFtMM R SDUED,that tha city ca>nril of the City Of Rancho,. Cucamonga appt-v- the fcrwz-dirz3 these mitigation rations to. the Planning Ci mussion and the des cW-icn of tta Caapanella, addeaa, and DiCaZ O virxayaxd l=has and structures as an Histcric Point of'Interest. PASSED, APPRO'VfD, and ADOPTED thins 20rh day;0 Febet�*y, Ag91. ®Ili AYES: A: sTx>sr, , .�taut willies, F7Plgt7t MES: None ASSW: MGM � �t '' D�sss3lis 3.. Sta=, Mayor ATTEST• „ �r DaIlra J. WNW City Clat v 1, imm, Cl:l'Y am of the City Of Fa;'A:2m Cucalxcxga, Cali{orlda, do hmby �y that tY�rl f=wjbq A® U= c duly passed, 3ppr�e , aandbyb hs City C di Rail of the C to�v ty ef Kcamoxga,: California, at m MPLIAr MMUrig of :Y.� cony mil.ts®ld an the 2p43i dry of February, 1991. 3; 3; 1 Nd f , t Page `y Fireia i9a 5: M--ignition =tld help protect it, t/ Regardless cZ the retiea pros called .,ni-.o play b�' objection, the,pr Foothill MarketplA6e would ,trpa'&' , greatly an historic site with StrOtIg cultural and ethnic sigtaific ince. '�lzus, 0 Per GES?A, the%project !Amid lve environmental eft:. } 23iese fects can.,to •ameliorated by forwatd�rrg to the Planning , Cac fission the mitigal ion r rn_ndatiois outlined in Section, a of this Resolution. -' SENT' 3: This des gnatioa for Historic Point of Trcr-.r has been ' v sewed aryl considered in. omtnpliarl:ic With the California IIw nrmmntal. qua'iity Act of 1970 and has been determined to be categorically ;exempt and ® further,,tide Council.hereby that thia following mitigation i n- aations be incluxied with the `,?lazrajng amm,saic4rs envircrmren<ml review and deterainations for the avezall Foothill marketplaea:grrjecto 1) fie prof crej _ shall . a city.%min s ra-d oral History Program, of the pit vier winL�P4King families ,of the subject area. 4! The existing strucLJM shall be dOMM ented fully according to , FBS/MM S'tandarsis by an architect.apprcrved,by J2-A city. 3! The pr0jiCt-:I0wrY_-Ls_shall donate l* Guidera and DiCarlo homes argil pay las their relocation to liersons.dem dating zrwrship of a parcel o:C land witfir►,t2se City of Rmncho Conga and suitable for such a' relocatien. Maw hcams shall be availab-le for !u doeaticw ever..a period of., iso days. Stag parcel;s , located in the- historicc=nMity of k'tiuWft will tngiven first-I;I2WeZ erine. gi► 41) MW project owners shall utilize persecs&i'names, and those of Lssoaiati%r, qualities, such as winery'name or wine labels, nt: the prmje= site%timrier possible. ; S) T-A dwmlqxc sha31 in=q�=ts the familial and agricultural " Put of .the arm into is ne d p iblic ark integral to the i.twft-0,design of ttm pro jm-t. his, a:V Mrk scroll portray Aen WMWdals win0-Wkinq put in a realistic ,attyle;and that:iav9e t oar will m9nit no lease than t alternatives in c ismi'then thm diffezwti artistic medium to role Historic tion ion's 'ivtfw. R n final-: if cati x>_s for this aseahit MCtusaly-int at®d aaWc dMn lie app=ed by the P'_artnir�Canimic n. 6) No d6diolition pests small be i for existing structures wi`Ain the proj®ri site .untilY;the issuatnos of bail iag perms fact,army now t 8 N !� .. Rwolut CR NQ. a � Executed this 2�,t day of Fifty , 1 At Rancho aczm d, California. City,Cie xk � J S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. FSPA 90-04 CITY OF RANCHO C--QCAHoNGA June 26, 1991 \` Page 2 + �f (b) Xhe property to the ncL�tb is designated for Commercial uses and ?s L-proved with a mix of uses including, a church, einyle-farm) , residences, retail stores, and a converted winery. - The property to the south is designated for Industrial uses- and is; developed with an industrial 'business, is being developed with a water trea�� � snt facility, and is vacant. The property to the east is designated for :eamsrcal and Residential uses and is vacant and developed with, single-family residences. The property to the west, opposite the Interetate 1S-Freeway, is designated for Commercial 'uses and in vacant; and (c) This amendment will, provide median loeatfone neeeosary to provide adequate 'circulation to serve the site while iaintaLning adequate circulation for the yet underdeveloped parcels rn 'the rr*th side of Foothill Boulevard: and ;j (d) Thici rmoadmant will provide for a m%steer planned commercial develoyment an was provided for with the adoption �f the original Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and !e) This amendment will change the zoning designation- of an Tuiustrial parcel not originally,eonaidered part of a future, mamtar planned, ctx=arcial development. This , landlocked pmet parcel would, however, beco�� j property due to the existing development and developments undoz construction to thu south and east.' The iacluaian of thimm parcel in the master plan is in kee in with the intent of the Foothill 'Boulevard SCecifie Plan and the General Plant proyi e a somprohensively planned area. f 3. Based upon thn substantial evidence rresented tc.•'this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts not forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concluder, az, fcllowss ' (a) That the am;''d"nt will provide for developaynt of a comprehensivr_+ly planned urban cemesunity within th[, dirtriott that i s'°.pupsrior to the development otherwise allowable under alt;rnate rasvlaticnsi and (b) That the amendment will provide for development within the district in a aarrar 'consistent with the General Plan and with related development eudrgsouttaagsnG plieiaa of the City; aril (a) 7116z the amarc° ent will provide for the constructirn, improvement, or skennion of transportation fazilities, public uti_titieo and public services zarjsirsd by development witk;n the district. 4. This ca.,mission hvrebv finds een reviewed a4d con:idaras in mom liarca, with the tali-fornia._:$M;lsonmsntal quality Act of 197.0 � 7 ! ;rd�, MW ""�� ;t ."maen$s issranoa of. a Negative 1 Declaration. i., f�F -3 2 • - ,; 1, RESOLUTION NO. 'C1 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANING COMMISSION OF THE CITY .OF f. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,_ RECOMMENDING APPROVAL JF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-04, REQUESTING O WiEND Tilt FOOTHI&L BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN *, TO MODIFY ".� 'Z MEDIAN BREAK LOCATION ON FOOTHILL I BOULEVARD, TO ADD A MEDIAN BREAK' LOCATION ON 'FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION. FROH LIGHT TO AREA INDUSTRIAL PLAN SUS RELATED COMMERCIAL FOR AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 2Z�, ACRES WITHIN- THE FOOTHILL (SUBAREA 4) LOCATED ON THE EAST \� SIDE. OF INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, IN' `J CON"NCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A IfZ ACRE' \ RETAIL/COMMERCIAL CENTER LOCAAD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF i FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SET_`EEN, INTERSTATE 15 AND ETIWANDX) AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-031-03 THROUGH 13, 15, 16, AND 20. A. Recitals. (1) The wattaon Company has initiated rn application for Foothill, Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 90-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in. this Aes;�luticn, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to'is "the application.? (ii) On June 26, 1991, the Planning Commission of thn City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.; (Li ) All legal preroquisitas prior to the adoption"�f -...A,,n Resolution have occurred. r` S. Resolution. NOW, THERB£ORZ, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Pla,zaing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts not g forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Rased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-vefsaenced public hearing on June 26, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, toSether with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The amendment pertains to a 360 acre parcel of land located an the south side o�_ Foothill Boul611vard Between Intarstate i5 and Stiwanda Avenme, with a street frontage of!,rk2,17S feet along Foothill roulsvard and ,*4*0 feet along 8tic41nda Avenue. The site is presently designated for Regional Related Commercial and Liglit industrial'uses and is developed with single-family residences, a winery comp:ex, awl &_converted gas station; and Pj/AaNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.. 52A 40-04 CITY OF RANCB}rUCAHONGA c June 26, 1991 t' Page 3 `5 Based upon the Findings and eoncl+.di a get forth iii par,"graphe 1,'2 {s 3, �n;i1d 4 above, this Commission hereby reer�lveq 'Follows: (a)j", The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the `City Council approvo ard: adopts%Foothill Bou..avard Specific p1san Amenda'e+t ` No. 90-04, as attached in Exhibit "A.^ " 0 (b) That a Certified Copy of tC,a'Resolution and related matarlal hereby adopt 'd by the Planning' Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. N 6. The Secretary to this 'Comm:ss?'gn shall certify to the adoption of 7 this Resolution. ,t \ APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 299,,� PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY Oe RANCHO CUCAA NGA z 3Y• Lawry T. Mckel, Chairman ATTEST:,__ \ U Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secret of the Planning 'f ar on of the Cityo ' Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby coytif that the fors"';,� ` g Y Y 9,`•'{� .�Rer,�lution yaws dul}, and rc �larly introduced, pained, and adopted by ie Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting r,,ihe Planning coma�'tsion held on the 26th day of June 11.1191', by the following vote-to-wit: , AYES: CWHISSIORM: NOES: ccmi�3I0ffim; ABSENT: cams3I0HEP9: l7_ J Oc � :E 4 0 � W W v. --- r 16 --1" S D C1 m le I'm IL 0 q o-to :a 6 pl 0 V oL:�L.i _ s Ic 0 W W 1 lu = C V: x o $ E W 3 W R 8 S. t o f = R UA � a fa s r _ � "3 - EXHIBIT rA-2 J � one��_•, ¢ _ i = �_ � fie• � �, � •4 a LU 14i? gig -- lu, r t EXHIBIT A-1 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 'NO. s C. '':90-37 FOOTHILL 4';n=T PLACE,'; "... June 26, 1931 Pago 2 (bj The property to the north is designated for Commercial uses and is improved with a mix of uses including a church, single-family residences, retail stores, and a converted winery. The pinparty to the south Lo designated for Industrial uses and in developed with an i_ dus_- inesss is bq ng_eee oped with a water transmieaion :aeility, �i_dis vas-a The property to the east it designated for commare n and Residantind is �'I', vacant and developed with single-family residence*, Th,i property to the want, opposite the Interstate 15 Freaway, is designated for Commercial uses and is vacant; and (c) The project will comply with a4minimum standard" of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (d) In conjunction v1th this applica�ion, the applicant has submitted a raquest to amend the lard use designation within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan from Light Industrial to 4,aqional Related Commei�ciel. Provisions were previously in(7orporated into the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to allow for such a change through review and ',pprovul of a Master Plan; and a) The -development of a t550,000 square foot retail/commercial center is consistent with the Regional. F.olnted Commercial-designation 41 the Foothill. Boulevard.Specific Plhn and the Commercial defiigna►tion of the General Plan. 3. Based upon thi substantial evidanca presented to this Commission,-I during tha above-referenced public hsrz;!.ng and upon the specific findingr of ►acte net forth in paragraphs 1 are` 3 ,ibove, thin Commia}-ion-hereby finds and cogcludes as fcillowss to) That the proposed use is in acco_•d with the Gene.,al Plan, the objectivez of the Development Cods, and the, r<-caae of the district in winch tle acre in located: (bi That the proposed use, togaCher with the conditions aJ'ql3cable therets; will not be detrimental to the _-mblic health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (T-A t.At the proposed use complies wick: each of. the applicable pr,ivicione 'the Development Coft and Joothili_8oulevard Specific Plan. 6. 9ic Crumission hereby finds and certifl" that the project has been reviewed ..end eonawdered in compliance w£tU the Caliu`osr,ta Znvirenmenral Quality ii;.0 of 1970 and, further, this CommiaAion hereby Misuse a mitigated Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and 2onclusicnn-,s.st forth in paragraphs 1, :2, 3, and 4 above, this Commi:.Qi on hw eby approve: the application subject to each and aaveryy condition, net 'forth below' and in the attached Stan:acl Con0ftions attached hereto and in"rporated herein by this reference. =i\ .SK -37 0701 C2 J1 ,{ 991 C RGJD ,4 Qf RESOLUTION NO. ; A RESOLUTION OF THE;PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF - RANCHO CUCAMOtIGA, QlUIFORNIA, APPROVIMO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-37,' A REQUEST FOR MASTER PLAN APPROVAL FOR A t60 ACRE RETAID{COMMERCIAL +CENTER CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 550,D06`GQU..ARB FEET 01 LEASABLE.SPhbE AND A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF CONCEPTUAL.SITE PLAN AND BUILDING: ELEVATIONS FOR THE PRICE CLUB FACILITY IN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OF THE FOOTHILL„ECULEVARD S14CIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 4), LOCATE6'014 THE,SOUIiH SIDE OFF, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN- INTERSTATE 15 ANU ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT' THEREOF - APN 229-031-03 THROUGH 13, 15, 36, AND-`20. i A. Recitals. ; ) The Watteon Company has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit 90-37 as described in the title of this Rasolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, tho subject Conditional Use Permft is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day:of June 1991, the PaMttring Commission Ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed publd hearing onthe application and concluded said hearing on that date. ® (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to `what adoption of this Reaolution have occurred. I B. Resolution. i NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found,. determined, and resolved by the ® Planning`Coamisal6n of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ac foll GIs: 1. This commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts not forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this'CommLsefon during the above-referenced publi= hearing on June 26, 19910 including written and oral staff reports, -together with public testimony, this, Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) Ttss application, applies to a *60 acre :parcel of land located on the south siEit of foothill Boulevard between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of t2,175 feet along Foothill Boulevard' and t600 feet along Stiwanda Avenue. The site is presently designated for Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial roes and is develope4 with single-family residencas,.a winery compL'ix, and a converted gas station; and 3/<7 6 I 4 PLANNING,COMMISSION'RESOLUTION NO. Cog 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 4 - 9) All future: pads shall be seeded and for., erosion control prior to occupancy of any buWlS nq ar Details: shall be included with the landscape lane i irrigation plane. The plans "shall be submitted f6r review ar,J;approval by the City Planner,;prior „ issuance of any b V,,,Aing permits for the canter. 10) All street furnitur;a, including'benches, bike racks, potted plants, light bollards and standarda, drinking fountains, trash rsceptac.es, etc., shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commissio;i prior to the 1 �' issuance of any building permits for the center. 11) Graffiti shall be removed within,72 hour►. 12) The entire sit!-, shall be kept free from trash and " 4 debris at all to ss anti, in no event, shall trash'and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 13) Therm shall be,praviaion for security patrol of the shopping 'cancer at lust three times per evening, seven days per week, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. ` - and 600 a.m. by a lcsnsed.private patrol. 14) Sun shelters on -;€tiwanda Avenue and on Foothill Boulevard shall be lnstallsd with street improvements and shall be architecturally compatible to the center. Final location and design' of the bus shelters shall be submitted for City Planner. review .and approval prior to issuance of any building permits for the eont�-r. 15) Any%transfo.rmers, service areas, or trasl. enclosures located near the setbacks of Rtiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall only be considered when they are screened by using a combination of walls, berms, and landscaping. 16) The freeway right-of-way, adjacent to the project shall be lavdaeaped, or an in-lieu gas paid, ka accordance with Planning commission'Resolution No. 87•`185. The landscape plans shall be approved by the Cit}: Plagnsr or the in-lieu fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 27) Specimen-size tree (36-inch box or larger) shall be provided at key locations including, but not limited to,; entries, plazas, on-site intersections, etc. The �, K-3 PLANNING'CONNISSION RESOLUTION NO. }� CUP 90.37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE Y June 26, 191,*+1 -Page 3 Plannira Division 1) Approval, f the Conditional Use;Permit is for the,, conceptual master plan for the entire shopping center and the detailed eite plan and elevations for Price Club. All ,other building®' Ad/or pads wil. Erequire the approval of a separate Development Review or Conditional Use. Permit application, as required by the Foothill Boulevard Specific,"Plan. - 2) Approval of Conditional Use -Permit 90-37^ ie� contingent upon approval of PootRill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-04 and _en ative Parcel C Hap No. 13724. I` 3) Prior to -the issuance of any grading or building - permits, a Tree Removal Permit application shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. An arborist's'report shall,.be, prepared to address the possible preservation and'--,. relocation of heritage trees on-site. The arbori shall be selected by the City and paid for by thr'^ '�%,alcper. ,cam 4) No occupancy shall be, permitted,for any user until all street improvements have been installed to the satisfaction of the CLtj. S,), If phasing s proposed, the phasing plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building parmits for the 6) No permanent outdoor storage of shopping carts shall be permitted. unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. .� 7) Parking lots along Foothill and 8tiwanda shall be fully screonad from the street through the use of t3 foot berms, low screen walls, and/or ,shrub planting, The final details shall 'be reviewad and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building perms is for>ths center. 8) A Uniform Sign Program shall be prepared for the center and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. " The program, shall consist of all on-site signage including, but not �• `'_ limited to, monumsnt signs, directional. signs, and wall signs. 4 -39' of ,� a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 6 \ 22)- Prior to the irjeuance of any permits or acceptsnce-of fi any future appl'.cstion, the applicant shall submit architectural plane, colors, and dretails,to further define the .architectural vocabulary expected for the center- The information (inaludiig the final colors and ^verification of All roof-mcunted aquiguent for Price-. Club) shall be reviewed and.approved by the Planni,�3g Commission. _ 11 23) A plait o4_„development for on-site amenities'shall be established, tc. "tie" the site together through `Pedestrian-scale linkages. Element® to consider. ina_uds, but are'nct limited to, `hardneape treatment and patterns; landspaping, trolliser, kiosks, street furniture, seating ar-`a, plazas, building featl`-,es, signage, ate. The final plans shall be.raviowcd-and app;oved by the Planning Commission prior to the ins1,ince of any building permits for the,center. 24) The final design of the retaining �sil along the fxcev1;y of.-ramp shall be reviewad ai td approved by the 1,tsign Review Comm ttes prior to i1i uance of any !tiding permits for the cantor. 25) Pursuant to provisions of C.lifornia Public Resources ®' Code Section 25089(b), this applieation-shall not be op9rative, veated, or final, nor will building r permits be issued or a Rap recorded, until (1)' the idotice of Determination (MOD) regard?;ng the associated environnantal action is fildd and posted with the Clark of tts Hoard of Supervisors of the t Coanty al San Gasnardi.nof and (2) any and all reWltsd filing fees asa..ds►id.,pursuant to California Fiah and Gams suds JVction 713.4, together w:th'any required handling sharps,.; are paid to the Ccue,ty Cheek of t+`m County of Ban Bernardino. The applicant sh311 provide the Planning DeFartment with a stamped ®' and conforms-,,^,cpy of the NOD together wi,h a receipt Moving that all Etas have been pald. :n the event this application is determined ex4opt fro® such filing fees pursuant to the ,provisions of the Ct*aitornia Fish and Gams Collet, or the guidelines promulgd*sd, thereunder, except for payment pZ any required handling charge for filings. Certificate of, Pao 3--emption, this condition shall be deemed, null-' and void. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. COUP 90-37 - FOOTHXLL MARKETPLACE t June 26, 1991 Page,'S type and location of tie trees shall be shown on the final landscape plane which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuances of ` any building parmits for the center. 16) Any outdoor vending machines shall be architecturally integrated into:the design of the buildings. The vending machines shall not —tend out into the pedestrian walk*eye. A recyciing permit application shall be submitted for any recycling cantor and shall be reviewed and approved by th@ City Planner pacer to the issuance of.any building Permits for the center. 19) Trash enclomures shall be designed to incorporate the i, following desig,r features to the satisfaction of the City Planner: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of the shopping,center. b. Separate gadentrian Acluling a self- closing 'dcor, that dues not ,•quire opening of the'main doors. ® c. Roll-up doors. d. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. v. Architecturally integrated overhead trellis. f. Chain link screen on top of the enclosure to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure. The chain link shall be hidden, from view. 20) The applicant shall make a good-faith effort to l obtain Pststisaion to Grade onto adjacent prcoortisa ryj� ��, in order to eliminate the need for retaining walls along the south property line. such evidence shall :S be presented to the ,City Planner prior to the issuance of gradLAg_pormits. 21) Ef permission to,grade off-site cannot be obtained, landscape Piano for Metropolitan Water District shall be reviewed to determine the practicality of installing wrought iron fencing on top of the retaining wall in order to minimize the`impact of the solid wall. The ;plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of ® grading permits. -Y0 " PLANNING COHHISS.ION RESOLUTION NO. " CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 2,6, 1991 Page 6) No demolition permits shall be issued for existing structures wit.iin the project site until the issuance of building permits for any #ew structure. 7) The applicant shall contribute up to Sloo,00o to establish a:fund 'f?r the reconstruction' of a 2,000 square foot barn"at the site of the City owned Chaffey-Garcia house, wherein local wine industry artifacts will be documented and displayed. Said funds shall be donated prior to the issuance of demolition permits. The design; of said structure shall follow the design of the original Chatfay Garcia barn and, its execution shall be subject to review and appaoval of the aimtoric Preservation Commission in the form of 'a Landmark Alteratl.on Permit. Encineerino Div&sion 1) Existing overhead Utilities a. Foothill Boulevard An in-lieu fee , as Contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication anti-"electrical)-on the opposite side of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shill be oil*-half of lthe City adopted unit amount 'times t)s length from the center of &tiwanda Avenue to ' th't westerly„Iterminue. b. Etiwanda Avenue - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities ralectrical except for the 66 kv electrical) on the opposite side of Rtiwinda Avenue"shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building :permits. Ths fee shall be ono-half the City adopted unit amount Union the length from the center_of Foothill Boulevard to the south project boundary. C. Overhead utility service lines which cross Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue-shall be removed concurrently with the removal of the existing houses on the south aide of Foothill Boulevard. 2) Foothill Boulevard shall be constructed from ftiwanda Avenue to the westerly project boundary as follcl,��: ,1 TK- q3 ;t PLANNING"COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37 FOOTH7,LL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 7 :t Historic Prese^vatioop 1) The applicant shall sponsor a City approved oral History Program of, the pioneer wine-making families of the subject area. The program shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 2) The existing structures shall be documented fully according to HASSJHAER standards by an architect ® approved by the city and paid for by the applicant. Thu documents shall be submitted fcr review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of permits for either dexolition or relocation. 3) The applicant shall offer to donate the Guidera and DiCarlo homes to percone demo",,trating ownership of a parcel within the City of Rancho Cucamonga suitable for such relocation. These homes shall be available ' for such donation oyar a period of 180 days and the applicant shall !/pay for relocation coats. Advertisements 'shall be plar,.d in the inland`'yallev gaily Bulled, and The Sun nsraspapsrs, at a minimum, every weekend during the 180-day period." The size of the advertisement. shall be one-eighth page and the 7i content shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the 'submittal to the newspapers. Parcel* located in the historic community of Etiwanda will ha given first preference. All 'documentation ® damonttrating compliance with this condition shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to the issuance of deaolition.psrmi+a. 4) The appli(.nnt shall incorporate the familial and architectural past of the area into commissioned public art ,integral to the architectural design of tha project. This artwork shall portray southern =tiwanda's urine-making past in a realistic style and the !applicant will submit no less than three alternatives, in no lose than three different artistic `mediums# for tEe Historic Preservation Commission's review. The final specifications for ® this, .architecturally integrated artwork shall be approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 5) The applicant shall use personal names and these of associative qualities, such as winery names or wine labels, on the project site wherever possible and appropriate with the approval of the center's Uniform Sign Program. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. p /� CUP 90-37 FOOTHILL'HARFET PLACE June 26, sy�;l Page 10 r�. 7) Provide doable (opposite direction) left to-.n lanes wiZ:hin Etiwandi Avenue to serve the project « entrances, Chostnut,Avenue, and a future driveway on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, or as otherwise. approved by the Ci�y Engineer S; Provide a curb-adjacent sidewalk for the busboy on Foothill Boulevard. Also, the curb-a4jacynt sidewalY for the busboy on,Etiwanda Avenue shall be minimized. 9) Provide a meandering sidewalk in accordance with City standard No. 304 on;Ettwanda Avenue: The sidewalk on Foothill Boulevard ant Etiwanda %_venue shall meet all driveways at the zero face of the curb return except for tha ..in entrance on Foothill Boulevard and ac otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 10) A final traffic study showing calculations for the determination of the length of all left turn lanes on Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue based an post 2010 traffic conditions shall be submitted to and approvad by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or, issuance of building permits, a'-._chaver occurs First. All street facilities -taulL installed os_rtqutred by the City Engineer. 11) A lot lino adjustment` shall be =corded to incorporate the northerly portion of APx 229-021-59 and the westerly portions of APN 229-031-16 into this project prior to the issuance ok building permite. 12) All of the project driveways and. the internal driva �. aisles to be used by trucks shall be designed to accommodate the Cau,,rans standard 50-foot radius turn template unless '',,.stificaticn is provided for a looser design radue as approved by the City Engineer. 13) 2 o property necessary for the proposed freeway.,off- rMp at the northwest corner of the site shall be &Mewed. It appears that Caltrans will not &,Clow thb retaining wall shown an the plans; thers .re P f fc a3ditional land'%to what is shown on the plans 'w.ili need to be rs®esved as approved by Caltrans and the City Rnginear. Also, the project plans will need to be modified accordingly. 14) Drainage fees for the development shall be paid as followas PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-37' xOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June tar 1991 Page 9 a. Full width on the south aide including the median curb. ' b. Thin ultimets backbone system on the north side consisting of two travel lanes (27-foot wide pavement) and the median curb or as otherwise approved by the City,Engiinear. c. Landocape the median island. Tits developer may request a reimbureament agreement to recocer.the r cost of onm-half width of landscaping fronting his .project from future development of acr rs- the-street properties. d. Construct a complete intereaction o2 Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard with trannitiuns to meet existing pavemont Last on Foothil iulorard and ,north on Etiwanda Avenue. . Alpo �, ttraff,Ac" signals shall be modified at,'.hs interswction of Etiwanda Avent 3 and Foothill' Boulevard. �3oth Items shall be as approved by,tha City'Engineer. a. The developer shall be eligible for fee credits againiit and reimbursement from the Transportation oil nevelopmant Fee`?fcjr the -portion of improvements daterained by the city Engineer to be of auppiamental .sire, length, or capacity over that needed or the impact of this development in conformance with Ordinance No.'455. 3) The traffic signal shall be i ,'stalled at the main entrants on Foothill Boulevard at the developer's expense. 4) The median island within Foo'^'Lll Boulevard shall be moved southerly so that it is symmetrical. about tho centerline or as cthsrw+,za approved, by the City Engineer. S) i'bs Toothill Eoulevard busbar,`shall br.:'moved westerly to be as Close as possible to the median opening to raluce -potential: jaywalking across Foothill doulovaid. 6) Et wandc dvenuo shall be widened on both sides as necossary to accommodate the street ;improvements necessata to mitigsts the traffic impacts of the project as required by the City Engineer.. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. UUP 90z37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 12 22) Easements for public storm drains within the site shall be provided. 23) The developer and the City shall enter into an agreement that transferal maintenance responsibilities from the City to the developer for the drainage facilities serving Foothill Boulevard at such time that alternate `acilitisR for disposing of the Foothill Boulevard drainage is provided and approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer, 6. The Secretary to this Ccmmission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ®. APPROVED AND'- OPTED THIS 26TH DXc OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING C MHISSION OF THE CITY OF='RANCHO CUCAMONO➢t _ BYa Larry T. HCNial, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller,, Secretary I, Brad, Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do `hereby -certify that, the foregoing Resolution was duly and, regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by, the -Planning"Commission of the 0 ' City of Rancho Cucamonga, a2 a,regular meeting of the Planning Commission hold � ^a the 26th day of Jun®'1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COHNISSICHMS HOES: CONNISSIORWRe: ABSENT: COUMNSIOHBR.58 is j 47 �I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION GO. } CUP.90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE- �( tsr\` June 26, 1991 Page 11 a. 3'Miwanda/San Sevaine area fees for the portion of the site within that area boundary .(easterly 6$ acres), - b. General City area fees for th4 portion of this site,outside, of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine area. c. A payment equivalent to the Day Crook Mello Roos' Assessment of $4,675 per acre for the portion of the site currently outside the DLy Crook channel Mello Roca District boundary. 15) Approval shall be: obtained from the Municipal :,Yates District and. San Bernardino County Flood Control' District to accept the existing flows from north of Foothill -Boulevard to -the facility along Arrow Highway and Day Crank Channel. If suoh approval*' cannot be obtai-ned, alternate facilities such as those required by the Etiwanda/San Savaine ;Drainage Policy (Area 9) shall be provided as approved by the City Engineer. 16) Intersection drains shall Se provided across Foothill Boulevard at Etiwanda Avenue sized to eonvev at such fiow as feasible as approved by the City Engineer. 17) Drainage facilitiea shall be r led to the north side of Foothill Boulevard alonj the pr.; ect frontage to collect as much flow as feasible as ,approved by the City'Enginear 18) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance for disposal of the drainage entering the property from the adjacent Caltrans area to the want. rf 19) Tan emll portion of the southeast corner of the ® prdperr2y shall be regr&Aed to-drain to the Municipal fates nistrict facility. 20) Coastruct' storm drain facilities to serve the Bite 90mrally an shown on the 'plans and as described in the project's pre-UmLAary drainage report subject to final plan check and a final drainage report as approved by'the City Znginser. 21t Easawnte for and permissi n to;construct storm drain facilities ond a. Xo ~4y wE;ws i�;orf-site properties."; J shall be obtained and' providad ai_"approved by the „ City Rngineer. t ,t This condition shall be waived A the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have en+ ,ed into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school i impacts as a result of ,is project. r/ 6 Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is _I_,/_,_ involved.written certification from the aff acted wate 1strict that adequate sewer and water facilities are Or will be available to Serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the wafer district within 90 days priorto final map approval in the case of subdivision or priorto issuance of permits in tho case of ali other residernial projects. S.Site Development t. The sips shall be developed and maintained in acwrdance with the approved plans which --JJ— inclune site plans, architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Division,the conditions contained herein, Development Code r p regulations,and _Specific Plan and Planned Community. f 2. PrF.fr to any use of the project site'gr business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shalt be completed to the saWacctfon of the City Planner. 3. Occupancyof the facility shall not commerce until suchilmeas all Uniform Building Code anr' J_J_. State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prfoi'to occupancy,purls ztv d be submitted to the Rancho Ci v:amorga Fri Protection District arld the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The twill wg shalt be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. a. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _J_— submitted for City Planner revWa and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. All site,grading,landscape,irrigation,and streetlnprovemant plans shall be coordinated for ' —!_ !— consistencypriorto issuance of any po.'ntts(such as grading,tree removal,encroachment, building etc.),or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom tot subdivision,or ®' approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shalt M W&O complance with all sections of the Development —,.J_I_ Code,.all other applicable Ck!Qrdhartm.and applicable Community Plane or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Pammit k"titnee. vp 7. A detailed on-eft Igo"print sW be miawed and approved by the City Planner and Sheriffs 9 7settt(98MI1)prior 10 the i wane of buikWq permits. Such plan shall indicate style.ftMkWM.iocatlon,height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect attpropeftlos. 6. If no centr.&ed trash receptacles are provided,all trash pick-up shall be for individual units' with all receptacles shielded from public view. *✓r 9. Trash receptacio(s)are raquked and shot!niaef City slarftrds.'The tPrtat e-Isign,locations. — and the number of trash receptacles shall b9 sub oato City P1=nnel,review and approval prior to issuance of tuifding permits, 10.All ground-mounted r;tiliy appurtenances such as tranpomiers,AC condensers,etc.,shall be located out of Dubtit view,vid adequatety screened through the use of a combination of concrete ormasonry,iva\S, ;erminq, and/or IaWscapisg to the satisfaction of the City - Planner. SC-2/91 2or12 • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNdTV DEVELOPMENT 'aftOME Wft rft Aw. 0%� ML o mft, ' N6 blANUA RIJ UUNUITIA"' ""A PROJECT#: 37 SUBJECT: r E APPLICANT: '45 'y4msc Cf*'O ; _ LOCATION: cT�( �/LL dYFY AVZgYiil= i5 slvro.�rw.sv� Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING OWISION, (714)SW1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE'—OLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limns s ® 1. Approval shall expire,unless extended by Planting Commission,if building pe;?Ms are —�—�— not issued orapproved use has notcommencedwafdn 24 moni tafromthedateofapproval. _ 2. DevelopmenuDesign Review shall be approved prior to__L.J_ 3. Approval of Tentative TW No. is granted subject to the approval of ✓ 4.ThedevetopershaNcommenco,padicipatein,arldeonsummatvoreamlobe ne-od. participated in,or coraunvna0ed a M04-Roca Community ftelli es District(CFO)tar Mite Rancho Cucamonga Fire Proterxlon 04M to Rwm construction arxVormaintenance of a fire station to sense the devewpment. The subw shag be iocamad,designed,and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Re Protection District.and shalt become the Districts property upon cormletion. The squO=nt ths;District in acco rweds. I ii ft of a Slag.4�dw*Mr st>be selected�comply with all 400411310 MWarld ragufstions.The CFD shall be formed by the Olatnot and the developer by the firm romdatim of the final map;cocurs. S. Prior to recof=lon of the final map or the lawance of ixlitding permits.whichever comes first,thaappilrAM_shall consent to.or participate in,Me establishment of a MOO-Roos Community FacMft District for the oa+>ztnaabn and of necessary school facilities. however,it any school distract has previously eoftllshad a fit h a CArntxanity Facilities Olsr�w.till aunt shalt, in the aaematfva,cofta M to tha annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District pdw to the fecrtdstion of the final two or the issuance of building permits.whichever comes first.Further i ft affected school district has not forted a Mello-Roos Community Facilities DWriuwiiitirtleeksmoathsfrom the date of approval of the pxim and prior to the moorMion of fhfa fkW map or issuance of building permits for said project,this condition shall be deemed null 2W void. SC»Z/91 1of12 �^ " .. c.n 7,:c 9. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners'Association.Shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official revimm and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances,IncUding air cOnditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections,shall be shielded frorn view and the sound bufferedlrom adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division,Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and coroitructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. i Details shall be included in building plans. ! D. Parking and Veh,cular Access(indicate doWlis on buliding plans) ®+ ✓ 1. All Parking lot landscape Wands shag have a minimum outside dimension of 6feet and shall J--J— contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stag(rock ding curb). +� 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavenwnl across circulation aisles shall a providedIftroughow.14e d4rialopment to connect dwellingslunitstbuildlingswith open spaces/ ® 1 plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double ftiped per City standards and all driveway aisles. JIJJ_ entrances,and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door opdnors if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from bark of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants,Conditions and Rastr flonsSWresitictftstorageoP`ecreationafvehicles —�---� on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation afslos other than in dos%rlatod viakorparxirg Xmas. I 6. Plans for any security gates shag be submitted for the City Planner. City EngUtraer,and —JJ Rancho Cucamonga Fire PrateccbnClsldca review and spprovalpriorto lssuancsof bu'ad'irg permits. i E. Landscaping(for publicly maintained Igindsegips arms,'refer to 3s,cctiort W.) 1. A detailed landscape,and Irrigation plan,i ncri►dinOsfopetN>ndiroartuila>odelM:tte tafx>rcap- ing in the case of resiklie i devebpmM, sty be pfepa[ed by a lensed landscape architeclandsubmilittedfoaMPisnnsrreiriewarrdapprMjpdarfotlleisl�a[ oCf9tri;d+rg permits or prior label map aplMall In the Cass of a custom lot rJaWalw 2. Extstingtmest-aquMadtobepraaeevedbnpiaaa►>,aiibepratecMdwkhaconsuLcftlbarear _/_J in accordanciewilhthe fdtfni*O COeSoctb t 15.03.110.aM$onotedonthegradingplans. The bcatict1cf61oae"a to be pteaerved in place and new focatlorta for traruplattted trees shalbeshmnonaledeWW plum.The appYextta Iclowal of theortiod*rs recommm4ftingYigaffM prssenration,tra.'tepIgnI 9 and trimming methods. 3. AminkttttmOf_trosapargroeaaCrV,00rnpdWofthofoioatingW*$.shaabeprovkW —/__j wifr"theProjoq: %-48-InchboxorlagW. %-36-Inch box or larger. %-24-inch box or WWr,_%-115-gason,and %-5 9"On- VO OF 4. A minimum of A�%of trees piaftted within the pnejsct#W be specimen aia®trao[i- 24-inch box or larger 5. Vf hin parking JOW,trees shall be planed at a rate or'we 151MY4n tree for every t0iree 'Jf parking stabs,selficfentt0 shade 509i Of the p91ki1p ant at solar noon onA+trgu5t 21. O 4 0[14 SC-2/91 11.Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with`• ® the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the rinal map. —— ✓ 12.All building nurnbers dnd individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, ___/_ including proper illumination. 13.A detailed pl-in indicating trail widths,maximum slopes,physical condfcons„fencing,and. J_!_ weed control,in accordance with City master Trail drawings,t.ha0 be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans.Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails,including fencing and drainage devicas,in conjunction with street improvements. 14.The Covenants,Conditions and Resirictiono(CC&Rs)shall not prohibitthe keeping of animals where zoning;wquiremon'Zs for the koeping of said animals have been met.Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals witbaut the necessity of appealing to'bards of Orectors or homeowners'assoeiVions for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15.The Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions(CC&Rs) and'Y ides of incorporation.of the Homeowners'Association are subject to thq approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney.They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits,whichever oavm first.A reca;-Isd copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 10.All parkways,open areas,and landscaping shalt be permanently maintained bythe property _!_J owner,homeowners'association,or other means acceptable is the City. -Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted fV City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. I _17.Solar access easements shag be dedicated for the purpose of assumIng that each tnt.or —JJ_ dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sung"across adjacent loft or units for use it a solar energy system.The casements may be cohlaGlad in a Declaration of Restrictions for the ctibdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with ffw reoondation of the final map or issuance of permits,whichever comes first.The saeements shag Pfohitit the casting of shadows by vegetation,structures,fbdures or any other object,exc W. for utfitty wires and similar objects,pursuant to Devetoprient Code section 17.03.OW-G-2. 18.The project contains a designated Historical Landmark,The site shall be developed and —1_1e maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Ageratbn Pannit No. . Any further sr f its€41e including,but not W*ed t0.extorior eiteratilm ardor ir4erbrallefa mvii!ch~ttidixted"of lhobuiditlg®f)c ouci".lm,feffmaiotlamWatk tmes.dawaligli^relocation,r fustionolbuiktinporstnrcturss,orchangestothesite, shag fecS**m trodliica lion to the HWaft Landmark Agemion Pena t subject to Historic c Pre", rvatiOei Comiriftsion review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An agemalive energy system is regtrirac to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units J—J_ and for heating any swlowning pool or Spa,unless other alternative energy systems are dertterlotratedtobeOequivalorkcap iiyandetfbo cy.Rlswk%T*QpoolskWagod atthe i tifnel of MAL&1 clovalopment shag ba supplemented with solar heating. Detags shag t', inc~..in the buildfr.g plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and a(o!an%dl prior to the issuarce of buildkfg permits. 2. All dwellings shall nave the front, side and rear elevations upgrades fth am"ectural treatment,detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment suls)det to City Piann2r review and approval prior to issuarce of building pemitils. SC•218t .oils /�—SD f. F.Sign Om 1. The signs lnai=sdon the submitted plans are conceptual only and noe apart of thisapproval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Crdinanceand shall I require separate application and approval by the Planning Divisio!i prior to installation of any signs. d 2. A Uniform SgnPropromforthis development shall besubmittedfo����ereviewwand J� approval prior to iss,'inco of building permits. I Directory monument:;ign(s)shall be provided for.^parti=nt,condominium,or townhomes prior to occupancy and snail regp;ire separate appibr.tan and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective Wyer written notae of the Fourth Street;Rock ,_!_J__ Crusher project in a standard format as determined by City Planner,prior to acceptLtg a cash deposit on any property- 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wrifisn notice of the City Adopted J—J— Special Studies Zone ror the Red Hill Fault, in a standard fomo as detemtinekl by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash diaposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of tine Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Plater.prior to accepting a cash deposit on any piroponly.- 4. A final acoustical report shalt be subm tteJ for City Pirratar review and appoval prior to the issuance of building permits. The Mai report shag discuss the laval of interior liaise attenuation to below 4SCNEL.the buildkw materials and constr,dbrrterhniquesprovlded, and if appropriate,ver?Jy the adequacy of the mitigation measums-lino buikg g plans will be checked for conformance with the milligaWn measures cornk,,r --n-6 finai repo". H.Other AgenciQS ✓ t. Erne rganeysrwonslafy accessshall bepirovidWInaocordamewkhFAnAaCucaftsongaFi;e �—�— Promotion District Standards. 2. Err*MartcyaccesssWibepmvidid,mMenw=traaaMcisar.amininumot2efeetwide —J---�-- at all times during aMltruftn in ascofdanso with Rang Cucamor*a Fire Protection District requkentanbt. 3. Prior to bawm of btu percds for combustible cm4ruction. evider" shall be _J—J— nftmkWt0ft Rancto Cuclit soripFireProtectionDistrictthattemptrarywatersupplyfor fire pro"Wo Is mmft pensittg completion a.,tlgtrM Pro protwion system. ✓ 4. The appllcM 00 corrilM the U.S.Pooil Ed. riW 90 determine the appropriate type and --/—/— ,ocatan of,_9 box®a.MukW&,Ny residr Md deveic�shill ptavkie a said overhead Vnacturo for moil ifoxes;with adeqfatq OCMNV.The t nai bmislon of the inal boxes and the detran of the bvar'Sgsd strimirg shall be subjM to Cky Pia MW rev ere&t.J apmal prior to the naluarni sit bulWq porerft. 5. i.of profits uei;.%" tank faci;itiss,written eertiftcation of acceptablilky.including all supportive irear ,, ., ;W be ootained fromi the,raft Bemsrdino Couray Otpriment of Environmental Ht!anfi and submitted to the Buildings Ofistal prior tQ the issuannee d9 Septic Tank P&M11116,aro,-**4t to issuanca of building pemtits. SC 2191 60!l2 Ji/ .97 6. Trees shad be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and Wong structures ata rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. ® 7. All private slope banks 5 last or less m vertical height arid of5:1or greater slop ,but less than 2:1 slope.shall be;at minimum,irrigated and landscaped with approoriat..ground cover for erosion control. Slope planning required by this section shalt include a part ianent irrigation systen is be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet.but less than 8 feet inveriicalheightandof2:lorgreater --J—J— slope shall be landscaped and Irrigated for erosion control;r"d to,often their appearance as !� follows:one 15-gallon or farger size tree por each 150 sa `. -slope area,1-azllon or larger size shrub pereach 100 sq.ft.of slope area,and approu y,fiurtdrAver.inaddition,slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 k..greater slope shall also include one S-galion or larger size tree per each 250 sq.it.t slope area.Trees and shrubs shall be Planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary sk,ae plaie.Slope planting required bythis section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development,all slope panting and inig%„M strap"cortinu, _/_/._ t ousty maintained Ina healthy and thrivirrg condition by the devafaoeruhitetlthlnanm; runit, is saki and occupied bytha b-5y®c Priorto releasing occupancy iar Wse,units;an inspectton shall be conducted by the! ling Division to determine that they arr, in sstistactory condition. _10.For muMamily reside 4naidential development,property om%lrs are respon• sale:for the continual;^ ,raet. q of all landscaped areas on-site,a5 WdH as Contiguous plarried areas within,_ ,public rignt-sf-way. All landscaped areas shalt he kept free from weeds and debris and rriaiiniafned in a healthy and thriving condition, and hvil receive regular pruning,fertilizing. mewing, and trimming. Any damaged, dsa3, diseased,or decaying plant material shah be replaced wlthin30 days from the elate of damage. 11.Front yard landwxong ship be required per the Dausloptr ent Code scud/or I J_ .This requiroment sauiki be In addition to the required street trees and slope plerfiN. `� ✓ 12.The final design of the perir;-etter po waye,v431g,landscaping,and sidewalks shall be inckcled in the roWlred tend$QVS PISS and shed tM tt>kJW to City Planner review and approval and COCO atedforccl sat®ncy With any parMvay Wdscapi gptanwhichtraybe I required by the Enginhtrinp 6.,aloft. 13.Special landscape foaalree Such as moundhV,sJE mW rt&,spw.Lwn slag trade.meander. _J__J_ ig sidewalks(with horWW dtaMe),artd intenaliod IarKhm9+it .Is requked Woo 6ms�y7�t �.ray. _ t/ 14.L aatd irriyetiott cYatMU required to be installed within the pu flip refit-d-way on _J_J the pe irWIW al this pmJM spa SW be Contirarrt"maigtalrto0 by trio cvatoper. 15.All walls sWbtprovidedwMhdtoor3tivroe treatment.If locatedin pubft WiNnitenanceareas, _! f the design Shad be coo.Vi sted with the Enginwi g Own 16.Trft maintenance criteria s MN be deyek�sed and slrb M*d for City PiVMr review and approval prior to i artce of puiidktg psnT*s. ThM criteria shalt enwurap ate natural growth Chaf=101130Cs of the Sal ted tr"spt . 17.LandsC2 i g and Irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of XerisCapo as defined in Chapter 1916 of the Ram Cucamonga Municipal COSa. S•2/21 S of 12 Due 6. As a custortrbt subdivision,the iollowing requirements shall be met: a.Surety still be posted aim an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site -�—�— hrainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety 0ivision priorto final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b.Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto —I--- or over adjacent parcols,are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c.On-site drainage improvements,necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided �—�— properties,are to be installed prior to Issuance of building permits for construction uNn any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows ordering, leaving,or within a'parcel relative to which a building permit is requested.' d.Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the BuilOng and Safety I _J_ Division for approval prior to issuance ofbuEKinga.-dgr g grading prrrsttst3.('ems maybe on an incremental or composite Fasis.) e.All slope banks in oxcess of 5 feet in venic- height shall bo eedwmr;i)h native grasses Jam._ orplarTtLdwiin ground cover forerosioncontrol upon cotr; Idiofgrad,nyor some other aftemativermlethodof erosion control shall be camp Widd,tto the safis!'WOnofthe Building Official,in addition a permanent irtdgaflon syst,an shall be provided. This raouirement does not release the applir art.Jdev=tt+¢9,-'frern r:orroance Mh tuts slope planting reciuimmenis of Section 17.08.040 i oiling 0eveloprnannt Code, APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING ERING DIVISION, (714)920-I ,FOR COMPLIANCE VATH THE FOLLOlAf NG CONDITIONS: L.Dedication and treht ulor Acc:ss= 1.Rights-W-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for Interior pA*c strei_-s. community trails.public f aseos,public WdecVe mas,attest Lmos,old!public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or teh97,is mp. Private 08--fit -10 for non-public facElilles(cross-lot drainage,local feec*h aiis,etc.)sha.H be recamd as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following riaelfaray an ft perimeter streets JJ (measured front street c4intsdnr2): bi1P.�AF�LE iold'-d on cY�.Z iLL rrr �''I t6�SN=fGE an y>/ls NL2+1 ft total Ieet cra twa)feet hn 3. An inrevocWk offer of dedication fair -foot vMa mKiway easament ahz l be rrrsde —'�— for all private streets or drives. 4 4. N w—vehicular amnia ShM be d kated to the City for fft8 folowkV stroll!: S. Reciprocal access easenhants;shall be providad ensufirtg&ocus to all parcals by CCBRs Of by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the nW atpdarto the issuance of building pennies,where no map is invnived. �-- sc-2/41 8 or 12 �� �� APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 98 -1863,,-OR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I.Site Development ' s✓ 1. The appiicard shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code,Uniform Mechani- cal Code,Uniform Plumbing Code.national Electric Code,and all other applicable codes, ordinances,and regulations in edw at the time of iasuancs of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Aclopilon Ordinance and applicabie handouts, 2. Prior to issIJ'ance o!building permits fora new residential dweilinq uttit(s)or major addition to existing unh(s).the applicant shall pay developmentfass at the established rate,Suchtees may include,but are not idriledtc:City Beautification Fee,Park Fee.Drainage Fee.Systems Deveiopmen!Fee,Permit and Pian Checking FRea,and School Fees. 3. Prior to Issuance of building pernift for a rseta commercial or Industrial devetoprrment or addition to an existi% d&velopment,the applicant stlalt.pay daveiopmant fees at the established rate.Such fees may include,but are not limited to:Systems Development Fee. Drainage Fee,School Foos,Parse and Plan Checking peas. ✓, 4. Streetaddressesshalrt�tpii� kedbythOSUDdingONfCW.atfertraMparcaln*pmeordation __i__/_ and prior to issuance of building permits. �.Existing Skvwums 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building.Code for the property line clearances considering use,area:.and fire-rosisthreness of existirt+g twildings. ® 2. Existing buii@ings shall be made to CoT". with correct building and zoning mqul(tons for J-r9— the intended use or the building shall be detno"O. 3. Existing sawage disposal faciikles shall be removed,fi W and/or capped to comply with the _..l-1_ Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Coo. ® 4. Uirdergmund on-sits ufiillin ate to be located and shown on building Edens submitted for _/._/_._ buildi%permit appaeutkm. K.Gm cling t. Grading of do autrgmlta psq*q aha:it beet umftrice with the U inform Ouilding Code,City —1—/ GMding ,tied 8CC'apt®d g �' .The final gM*rq plan shall be in with the apgtroved t_a-q ow. 2. A Saida tqM ti W be psapared by a Qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to —1--�— perform sum WodL i!. The Owilopmem is located within the sod e90iaion Control boundaries:a Sol Disturbance c—!_ Permrtis required.Please contact San County caparignm ofAwiaukureat(714) , 387-?°`9 for pernik appkation.DsaltrMMmtionofslachpem*-SWbe submitted to the City Prior ';a!mans of rough grading per• ! 4. A g"logW reporf sfsall b®prep nild by a ggaidied ilinginefforgeolnist and sxt"Ieu st t)te linty of application for grading plan check. S. The firt*'grading plant;Shan be Completed anCl approved pWjrto issuanCilt of building permits Notes: (a)Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter, (b)Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check, (c)If so marked,side;;- walkshall be curvilinear per STD.304. (d)if so marked,an in-lieu of construction fee small I be provided for-this item. ✓ 4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans Including street trees and street lights,prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer,shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.Security '$ shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing conVatfotxof the public and/or private street improve- merws,priorto final map approval orthe issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. 9 b. Prior to any work being period in public rightof-tm.fees shall be paid and a JJ� construction permit shall be obtained frcn the City Enginear•s Office in addMbn to any other permits required, c. Pavement striping,rn;:6 .g,traffic,street name signing,atc interconnect conduit shall be installed to thA satisfktlon of M9 City Engineer. d. Signal canduk with pull boxes shakbeit luilfedonan),now constructionorreconstructon of major,secondary or collector sirsets which Womect with other major.secondary or co",ecsor Streets for future traffic signals.Pus boxes shO be placed on both skies of the street at3 foist outside of SCR,ECRoranyotherlocatlarfs appmved by the City Engineer. Notes: JJ_ (1)All pull boxes shall be No.6 unless othermis a specified by the City Engineer. � (2)Conduit shall be 3-k;ch gahranixed stet with putlrope. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be instated an as four comers of intersections'per city Standards or directed by the City Er .gincer. I. Existing City roads requiring constnuc4on shall remain open to tmft at al times with -J—J— adaquate detours during pat:=Mn.iRssfrea4r rseurepamttnlaylsa regl/ired.Acash deposft shall be provided to cover the of Wading and paving,'which stray be r*n dsd upon motion of the cons tr Jc9on to the Wiefactfon of the-City Engineer. g. ConcefNrats.,dminap firs slftall not c,Iasa secs Unttr skkwak chains shell be J_!_ insfVad to t%Ky ftnftlb,except 4tarr fan*late h. HWOM access ramp design'via6,l*t€a speciaw by the City Enpow, —J_J I. SUM MMM SW be qVioved bytne City Planner ptiarto submittal for WplsF S*ck. _/—t 5.Street' Plarts per CRY StIWK%skrfaras e Strom sizabeprnvkw_tor revise an`d appmvell by#* City iEngei eer. Prior to any wfs#bft perlonTled on the pri- vets Oasis. fees sW be paid and'ol mitrtxxion pee nb tiff be cbluilrW from ittsCity Engineers Office in addition to any oth m pom>fls rwomd 6.Street trees,a minimum of 11"atlan sae atl:argez„"' y be installed per Cky Standards in _ accordance with the CRY$street tree program. SC-2/BI 10of12 Ceram 17 6. Private drainage easements forcross•lot drainage shall beprovided and shall be delineated ry. or rioted on the final map. --— 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10doot,fidnimumbuilding restriction area on the ,+ _ neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: 'UWe hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of(residential)buildings(or otherstructures)within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas.' A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. All existing easements tying within future rights-of-way shall bequitciaimedordelineatedon J_J the final map. V 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public rgM-of-way _J—1 shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10.Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along righFtum lanes,to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs.H curb adjacarx-,.dgwak is Used along the right turn lane,a parallel street tree maintenance easement shaN'be provided. 11.The developer shall make a good faith a-fort to acquire the reMirod off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public Improvements,and H hatsheahould fail to do so, the developer shall,at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval,enter into an agreement to complete the Improvements pursmant to Government Code Section 66462 at such tfineas the City acquirestheptopetty,klerssisreguiredforth@Improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the deveiopsrof all eats Incurred by the'City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connectionwiththe subdivision.Security for a portion of these costs shall be In the form of a cast►deAosit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer,at developer's cost.The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M.Street Improvanarrts 1 All public improvements(IMedw ctfws.dralrrage faMles,comrnurAy tralls,pasecs, lan&Aaped areas.etc,)shown on ttre pW%and/or MUM nap shall be constructed to City Standards. Interiorsireei imprgvpnwnts sM linckift,but am clot urtdted to,curb and flutter.AC oA-+rement.rktvs .silftwaks,street Wts.and sl M trees. 2. A mfnimun i of 2d-foci weld pavemerit,wkNn a/40-toot wif'. ed rlght-d-way shaft be _/_j_ ® constfuctad 1w all half-xCUon st3'lets. 3. Constnid fltm Mming pmrirt±s:'!sires:Improvements Including,but net bridled to: SMErNAbM CURB@ A.C. SIDE DRIVE SrRM STt2= Cord. GUrMR PVbfr WAILA APM tdGHT5 MES TRAIL [Sf.RNtd OT1iER D1X�LL iG✓D ✓ ✓ [' ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ �/ I �isY�*9 iFrE ✓ ✓ �'' ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ f 1 SC•2/91 4.A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within dsright•of-way. c. „ 5.Trees are r-hibited within 5 re9t of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measurw", dhe outer edge of a mature tree trunk 6.Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the avert of a —J—� blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P.Utilities 1.Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas,electric power,telephone,and cable TV(all underground)in aaordance with the Utility Standards.Easements shall be provided as required. 2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _I—J 3.Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucartarga County Water District(CCWD),Rancho Cucamonga Fira Protection District. and the Environmental Hearth Department of this County of San Bernardino.A letter of compliance rromthe CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Q.General Requirements and Approval l ✓ �1.The separate parcels corttairsAdwithin the project txwndaries shall betegettyct.rnbined irlo one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2.An easemer t for at joint use driveway shall be provided;prior to final map approval or issuance of Wilding permits,whichever occurs first,for: ' 3.Prior to approval of the final map a d r` Jam_ ejtose shad be posted with the City oovenf►p the estimated cost of apportioning the asl Assm. rds urder Assisegmont D;sftl among the newly created parcels. 4.EtiwandalSan Sevatrte Area fRegOrihal MaNne,Secondary Regional,and Master Plan Draa•'°"_�Fees shah be paid palm to final map approval or prior to bung permit issuance if no map is involved. Pemri`4 shall be obtained from the following agencies for walk within their right-of•way: �t �ilbd ' ' G�crr_r�ar 6.A signedowmiltit a6 W watvef fonet to join anclfor form the Law Enforcetnertt Community Facil in 00 b®MW with the C ayErgineer prior tofin al Bvtep apprOmat or the iSSUUice d p m ts,whichever ocours first.FornWItin costa shazll be bongs by the Developer: 7.Prior to finalization of any developrnent phase„wMent improtremsnt plains shall be com• -` Plated beyond the Phan boundaries to assure eeeaatxfary access sled drainage protection to —— the satisfaction of the City Engineer.Phase boundvies shah Ooffesponcl to lot isles shown a on the approved tentative tnap. SC-r2/91 12 of 12 ,.J f ?7 7.intersection fine of Site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. J-r_ a. On collector or larger Streets.lines of sight shall be plotted for all aroisct intersections_ including driveways.,Walls,.signs,and slopes shall be located ot4sidd the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City .Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved,usus.ity by moving the 2+/•crosast street trees an each side away from the stnjiet and plardc u i a street ® tree easement. 8.A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within thill following right-of-way: ��— _f��n/itl. 9.All public,improvements on the following streets shall be operationallty complete prior to the -y—f issuance of buildingpennits: N.Public Mafntananco Areas %/ 1.A separate set of IancNcape aN irrfgallon platfa per Engineering Public Works 6tandards shall be siift�-ittad to they C.y Engin"r for review and approval prk;ir to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.The following landscape parkways, medians,peases.essamenter ftle,Mlothepeow are reiqu[Md tal:be anncxed into the Landscape Maintenance District: d 2.A signed consent and wahrerfonn to join and/orform this apppropriate Landscara/ind Lighting --J--j_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer pdorta final map approvidlorI ianeeofbuilding permits whichever occurs first.Formation costs shag be bane by IN 191�'4foper. 'd 3.All required public landscaping and Irrigation system shall be continuously maintained by the developer until ampted by the City. • ✓ 4.Parkway landscaping on the following sMt(s)shag catitorm to the results of fhs respective Beautification Maslen Plan: O.Drainage and F5mW Cortraf f. The pm)M(or p thereof is located within a FkAd Hazard ilorfe;thorefore,flood —J-,-!— proteftill PJ 40ft"shall be providled as certified by a regMersd CIvg E.Vnear and approved t*ft Clle,Ergkmr. 2.It shag be the davvl pmr's responsibift to have the cuftM FIRM Zone designations rameved from the projeO area. The devOopeirs*View shall prepare all necessary rgmft..plans,and hy&ftg1cArjdratrgc calculations. A Cawalonal Letter- of Map Revision(CLOMITj shall be obtained from FEMA prior to fk-W map approval or Issuance of bt!WV permits.+vhchaver occurs firm.A Letter of Msjp Revision(LOMR)shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or imp,ovoatigrx accaplanCil,whwmer occurs first. y 3.A final drainage study shag be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final �— map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facH dies shag be installed as rewired by the City Engfrteer. SC-ales 11of12 _ 0.6/14,1991 10150 FROM AUSTIN FOUST ASSOC. TO 2638073 P.02 AUSZ1A!-r-0dOST A OCIA ES. INC. MW IRA fFI.0 BNO 177 ER—a AN'D -7A N5POR rA riot et.ANNivo 2020 NORT14 TVSTIN AVENUE • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701' 'T2LEPHONE(714)667-0496 PAX(714)667-7952 MEMORAMUNd ® TO: Mr.Dan Plies,The Plies Companies F�L�lvt: Joe Foust,PIS SUBJE(-T: FOOTII13.L AIARKMIACE TRAM- C S177-1;'fl3 DATE: June 14,1991 LVIRODUCTION In January 1990, Austin-Faust Associates, Inc. (AFA) prepared a traffic study titled "n coerce arkway Cemter Traffic-AnabjW for The Plies Companies regardim?development and access for the property east of 1-15 between Foothill Boulevard and Arnow Highway, In November 1990,The Keith Companies prepared a traffic study for a portion of the same area titled"Traffic Analysis Study forgthm Mar lance°and we have reviewed that study on your behalE This memo summarizes slur comments ANALYSIS AFAs original analysis of aces and circulation for the study area included four (4) alternatives two of which involved north-south circulation through the site connecting Foothill Boulevard with Arnow Highway and two which did not include through arose. The finding and recommendation of our study was that s plan which provided this north-squ($,r--, n=lion provided a better circulation system. That study went on to recommend an appropriate'cross-section for the connecter roadway (called Commerce Par signalized. Parkway). � addition, that reeommendatioa placed the ga intersection on Foothill Boulevard at the location.r,%luired by the Foothiill Specific Plan (FSP)• Our review of the Foothill Marketplace Traffic Study indicates a relatively thorough effort 40 was undertaken,but the limits of the studywere on Page 1 the confined. As an eaampie,is the remarks g , report states,Me project can have access from two sides only,namely Foothill. and Edwanda.." It is clear this study did not examine the'impact of dh)ect access on this site,or adjacent property to Arnow Highway or conversely the direct access of any dervclopment directly to the south through their site to Foothill DOUIevard. in reviewing the study, I find that it basically uses s conventional traffic en&eering VOr14l17b1 1bxo4 rKUn HUb'11N hUUD1 HDDUD. lu 40000r4 methodology in accessing project impacts and,in fact,much of its analysis is based on the'Raacho Cucamonga Traffic Model(ACTH)prepared by AFA. The study seems to"justify"its conclusion that the main e;,�ancc on Foothill Boulevard need to be relocated from that specified is the FSP ® based on its suitability to Price Club. The study furthCycknowledges on Page 13 that"...the access' restrictio> {two side only),"along wits':. the rcquiretaents of committed major tenants(Vital-Mart and Prig Club)Wccc factan;in determt that the signal needexi to be relocated. This fiuther iiraiaates the study did sot concern trcelf with accesc to/&om Arrow Iiir,,h+�vay, Finally,a swell point,but one I think demonstrates that the�esit�es of the major tenants were a substantial factor influencing the Marketplace traffic study is do onstrated by the arvi ments justifviag kft-ttu3 acmes a ai-Mart's uasignaHzrd driveway, oin p" Z�the studysta "Dual laft•tura:lanesere' �� �' .impractical at I I ."ciai diil-wafs.." This`statenteci�is untrue, Dual left-turn' lanes at signalized anzances to shopping centers arc co m onpiace in fact,the cross sectional design recommended by AFA for Commerce,Park-my has two entry latter which could atxomtnodate dual westbound left-turn lanes from Foothill BoukwArd.It appears that this statement is 2 weak argument attempting to justify insta _lling an additional leA-turn lane ai medlaa'break at the Wal-Mart driveway. CONCLURON rr It appears that the Marketplace trsftllc study;although following a conventional traffic engineering methodology was smeerelylimited in its scope tha',>did not cOzWder the need for or benefits of direct access tcTh m Armor Mglmy. i r4 -TOTAL'.F,03_ T H E K E 'I T H C O M P A N I E S a —', 3•i. r 57a D.epo In4 4Y � . Pfannrtrg•011MISn+een"S EmLrotrmn,ratSrnxn•Arcbltettu.e•Lmrd.rapeArcbrtectu..La.,d Sum•.)m&. August 18, 1688 0910-001 Mr.Russel Maguire City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 BaseliO Rd. Rancho Cuorrionga,CA 91730 Re:Tentative Yract No.9326 i Dear Mr. Maguire: In our meeting on Monday;August 15, 1988,you informed our client, Mr.'Dan Plies, that Tentative Map No 9326 could not be approved until the circulation patterns in the Ipdustriai Specific Plan and the Foothill Specific Plan had been amended: We are hereby requesting the city to begin this process. Any effort that O the city could make to expedite this amendment will be appreciated'. Our client would like to see a road that extends from:-Arrow highway to Foothill Blvd. We are enclosing a plan that shows our preferred alignment. We think that this alignment will benefit the future projects in our immediate vicinity. We will also'be available to the city staff to discuss the affects of any alternate solution on our project.. .. Thank you for your cooperation on this matter. THE KUM COMPANIES SAN DIEGO,INC. thomas C.Carmody,PE Director of Engineering TCC:ac 9101008 ssl3oa,..arcs.s+deetoAsssar�wus�urie:s)sassoee t '� ;: Afurra Corrodsese lalwarm4 iM.K,nmr -RA7d4,tdXiVi t O .tier ir"1�t, ztij;is;v�z•Cr lii� n�41�' 4S,tltli'Wed ' ' j+r..•���-0 1+fir. j 01 i <ti Stil. i.�lt .i `.t i!f a�ltca t�{r*�t)o�{j�i »i,.t1�r LL �tY RAP yt. r ® _' t?�, p R1 ' 'ti YJ %TiJ•ay`#Yti'9}i�s, i��Jl •� �t sR�•1 's►r'rf�.i�;� }�f r' di .a; �34•ty� 1''� ���"tt� �•�; trf� is�b r s � p7 SS J Y O ��^ ii�(-•�i a51h'�' ��1 7J t.ii.:.�1.��,�sy E,1 rz 4;i Gc — i cq ,i 4i a {Jt1 iC Slt l4 ii.}►.t�r'r iti. 'a7f SF1 '. w 4�'r•ii r �i 't 4'�� .F'Tt'�Mi2i$ .�r�`r��J t!, I � O ' � �;K3.ra. L•.i �F ta"D �4i' .u` _.6t h. 6 U •� QI r A�G3 .. i _ • .. '� rJhllrl . --------------- DEVELOPERS-REALTORS INVESTMENTS f April 12, 1991 Mr. Paul A. Rougeau Rancho Cucamonga Vn°trlopment` (Traffic Engineer) 9320 Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 ® Rancho Cucamonga, California,.P1730 Dear Mr. Rougeau: My daughter Debra and I enjoyed speaking with you last Wednesday evening. As I mentioned, the traffic study I left with you (which was prepared by Aus.tin-Faust Associates in January, 1990) resulted from a meeting that was held at the City on November 30, 1989. At that meeting, there were several items discussed, one of the significant items being traffic patterns for our proposed development. The persons attending the meeting included Jack Lamb (City Manager), Rick Gomez (Community Development Director), Russ McGuire (then City Engin_er),, Brad Buller (City Planner;, Don Womack (our Builder), Bruce Mauner (our ArchitectiLand Planner), Ken W.nvil.le (our Civil Engineer) and myself and my daughter Debra. The ;;=pose of the meeting was to discuss various items concerning a propose; master plan for the property at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue, of which we own a part. We had, been rav!:ng some difficulties with our planning, in part because of the City's inability to .;ive us ® clear direction on what thsy wanted for a traffic plan. Eventually, at that November 30 meeting, we were told by the City officials that we should engage a reputable traffic engineer to perform a traffic study for the entire project and that the City would adopt whatever recomm_ndations resulted from the traffic study. The City suggested that we retain Austin-Faust Associates to do this study and, following a`meeting which we had with-Fr. Faust on December 4, 1990, we did so. The Austin-Faust repurt, a E2706 Aspan St.,Suite 701,.Lake Forest-El 7bro,California 92630 Telephone(714)77C.1633 DEVELOPERS-REALTORS-INVESTS ENTS ® Mr. Paul A. Rougeau h April 12, 1991 Page 2 Im copy of which T delivered to you last: Wednesday, was the result of that study. We have always believed, and have acted and planned accordingly, that the traffic 'scheme recommended by Austin-Faust would, in fact, be adoptedby the City. We have done so in reliance,upon'what we were told at the Novembex:130-:, 909 meeting. Immediately, after we received the traffic study, Ken Linville delivered a copy to Russ McGuire and I delivered ore to Rick Gomez. I was shockeO to learn that youhad never peen the study until we gave it to you or. Wednesday. The cost to us of having the study prepared was $9,000. - We shall be happy to meet with you at your convenience in order to discuss this matter further. n `Tery ru y your , _ a �• r i, Daniel L. Pies cc: Ken Linville Lon Womack Cameron M. Smith, Sr,, Esq. Bruce Mauner, Creative Environs f _ I 22706 Aspar.St.,Suite 701,Lake Forest-Er,mil 7bro,"G'dUfo%'4i4 92630 Tedrphane(714)770.1633 u r' Draft t4 CUE4ItLIERt::,;PARKWAY CENTRE f� a Traffic Analysis Prepared for: The Plies Companies Prepared by. Austin-Foust Associates,Inc. 1450 North Tustin Avenue,Suite 108 Santa Ana, California 92701 7anua.y 31,l1990 c I `�l r Il t� CONTENTS 71 Page I. INTRODUCTION i Project Description Definitiomc I-1 References I-3 I ® H. PROJECT SETTING r Surrounding Highway Network 1£I Existing and Background Traffic Conditigns LI-i rs I III. TRAFFIC 1Wt1CT ANALYSIS III_l Trip`Generation �I Traffic Impacts III-G N. RECOMMENDATIONS I APPENDIX i s 'J I. IhrMODUCTION This report preset#ts..the results of a traffic analysis pertirmerl for the proposed development of Commerce Parkway Centre in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The report has been prepared for submittal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in support of the application„For the project site. PRMr—T DESCRIPTION The proposed project is located on the southwest corner of Edwanda Avenue and Foothill. �fp Boulevard. Figure I-1 illustrates the location of the project site. Four site plan alternatives havr. been developed which would develop the 1 96.62 acre site with a mixture of office, commercial, restaurant, and.warehouse uses. Access to the development will be provided along Foothill Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Arrow.Highway. Two of the alternatives provide an internal roadway connection between Foothill and arrow"Highway parallel to the Devore Freeway. The tiaf is.analysis examines the;impacts of adding project generated traffic to the background traffic on the surrounding a..e.—a!network Consistent with. the format used fer eavirontnental:impact reports, thr. traffic analysis material presented here is set out as follows: Chapter IT-Project Getting Chapter III-Project Impacts Chapter IV-Potential Mitigation Measures I� Detailed analysis results are also contained at the end of the report as technical appendices and referenced in the text where appropriate. DEFINITION f Certain terms used throughout this report are defined below to clarify their intended meaning: iR9 ¢¢ NtLSOE F YLAM b NCiMN F— a , oTM o - PROJECT LOCATION m a g aM vx awn�aowo p aawa ornE v i Figure 1-1 VICINITY MAP I-2 Background .ralfic-Estimated traffic volumes on the arterial system before the addition of project generated traffic ADT-Average Daily Traffic. ICU-Intersection Capacity Utilization. A factorused to measure the volume-to-capacity ratio for an intersection and determine the level of setiice. LOS Level of Service. A.scalq.,used to evaluate circulation system performance based on t; intersection ICU values or volume/capacity ratios of arterial segments. The levels range from"A" to "F," with LOS "A" representing free flow traffic and LOS 'T' representing severe traffic congestion. Peak Hour-This typically refers to the hour during the AM peak period(typically 7 AM- 9 AM)or the PM peak period(typically 3:,PM-6 PM)in which the greatest number of vehicle trips,are generated by a given land use or are travelling on a given roadway: VPD -Vehicles per Day. This has the same meaning as ADT but is generally used in a trip generation context rather than in reference to the highway volume of an arterial segment. °PH-Vehicles per Hour. VIC-Volume-to-Capacity Ratio. This is typically described as a percentage of capacity ® utilized by existing or projected traffic on a segment of arterrFi or an intersection turn movement. REFERENCES 1. "Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model Database,"Austin-Foust Assoc ates.January 1990. - '��� It? PROJECT SETTING \J This chapter describes the project site in relation to the transportation setting. Thi"existing circulation system is dismissed,and existing and background traffic volumes and levels of t vice are st mmarized SURROUNDING HIGHWAY NETWORK Traffic generated by the proposed project will primarily access Foothill Boulevard d and Arrow ® Highway. Foothill is a Your-lane east-west arterial currently carrying 29,000 vehicles per day in the project vicinity. Arrow Highway is a,two-lane facility currently carrying 9,000 vehicles per day in the vicinity of the project Regional access .o the project will be provided b the Devore Freeway I-15 A full- service interchange is located along Foothill immediately west of the project site. EXISTING AND BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing AM and PM peak hour intersection turn volumes at key intersections were counted in January 1990,by Traffic Data Services,Inc. These existing AM and PM peak h6ir turn volumes j are illustrated in. Figure U-1. Background traffic volumes were determined from the Rancho I! Cucamonga Traffic Model(RCTIM)for the year 1996(see Reference 1 in Chapter 1). Figure 11-2 illustrates background AM and PM peak hour volumes. Existing and background intersection lane configurations are presented in Figure 1I-3,and intersection capacity utilization(ICU)values are presented in Table.II-1 (actual ICU calculations are hicluded in Pie appendix). The ICU values are a means of representing peak hour volume/capacity ratios,with a value of.90 representing the upper threshold capacity for Ievel of service(LOS)"D." As the table indicates,all intersections operate at an acceptable level of service undez the existing and background conditions. II-1 a II t 440 985 518� 26 - FOOTHILL �� ,-A-71P t 10 o' .4-1382 zQ.... 110-1 448, ti 34 261 ARROW HWY A .-10 33�98--� 91 AM A11� v037 1161 --► 370 250 1 At- 53 FOOTALL Y� ~ 643 76 �! 11223--► I 76'i nuN 4_ 73 p s-872 a 413 : �w 864--� p � mN lal O NO 41 N 15 ARROW HWY 38 112_? II# 355-► 126--4, N • M Figure 11-1 EXISTING PEAK HOUR COUNTS alUST�Fi"iEI�T�!S&OCG®TES �fC II-2 351-P 546-Z mN It- 227 421 FOOTHILL /1 e 140 51 t 196 y 62 I L 32 Z 89 t-527 248 ul ARROW HWY .t-qZ^ 16 t� / 261-► Et AM ham. II L. 192 Y >•q- a36 1508--I- 444-;b, nw n n t 151 FOOTHILL �� a-- 2688 46468--wmi N 0.- 421 1323 4i 276--►� - ,O� h h LJ 1� nrym tt 169 ARROW HWY rb a- pia 271 868--t► I 354—, ,oN PM Figure 11-2 BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR VOLUMES F A!l.4T�FOUST��80C/AYES, IL-3 J N FOOTHILL •� 1 A o z =Z: L w L ARROW HWY 1 EXISTING M �4 FOOTHILL r l: 0 s w `� W O 3a: ARROW HWY - f BACKGROUND Figure U-3 EXISTING AND BACKGROUND Off rIf1S7 tN/SP.ISSOC/AYES, LANE CONFIGURATIONS II-4 lad 1Lhlc'n-1. BACKGROUND CONDMONICU'SUMMARY EXISTING BACKGROUND , INTERSECTION AM PM AM PM Ak L'F15aB A Footb0l )\t 3 �S 37.. .47 2 I45 NB&Footln4 44 40 3. Eftw iv&Foolhjl .57 72 53 .79 ' 4, Etiwnnda&Arrow EiwY 46 55 .87, .70. 1 Level of Semca tango .00-0.60 A S1-0.70 B J1-0.80 C Sl-090 D .91-1,00 E Abaft 1.00 F ANN - v III. PROJECT IMPACT ANALYSIS This chapter describes the potentiL impacts of the proposed development upon the surrounding arterial network. Traffic generated by development of the proposed project is added to the existing an,background volumes presented in the V vious chapter and the resulting capacity impacts are assessed. TRIP GENERATION As discussed in Chapter I,the proposed project consists of 96.62 acres which will be developed with a mixture of office,commercial,restaurant,and warehouse uses. Appropriate trip generation rates for the proposed development were derived from the RCCIM. Table III-1 summarizes these trip rates and the trip generation for each of the development alternatives. Alternatives A and B include an internal roadway wFieh provides a cf - tion between Foothill and Arrow Highway. Alternative A,which is illustrated in Figure III-1,consists of a total of 938,650 square feet and generates 45,395 trips'daily,of which 1854 will be generated in the AM peak hour and 3763-will be generated in the PPh peak hour. Access will be provided at one entrance along Foothill, two entrances along Etiwanda, and three entrances along Arrow Hwy. Alternative B provides an additional toedway connection from Etiwanda to the main internal roadway. Access along Foothill,Edwanda,and Arrow Hwy remain the same as Alternative A. This alterna:ve consists of 934,950 square feet which generate 46,920 trips daily,of which 2,041 trips wi!l be generated in the AM peak hour and 3,828 will be generated in the PM peak hour. e Figure III-2 illustrates the Alteriiative B site plan. Alternatives C and D elimitwe the internal roadway connection from Foothill to Arrow Hwy in order to discourage trucks from using the roadway as a shortcut to and from the Devore Freeway. This configuration creates a separation between the office and warehouse ure i in the. ® southern portion of the project and the commercial and restaurant uses to the north. Alternative ® C consists cf a total of'M,900 square feet and is illustrated in Figure III-3. Access is provided by one entrance on Foothill, two entrances on°-iwanda,and two entrances on Arrow Hwy. As the above referenced table indicates,this alternative generates 39,578 trips daily,of which 1,453 will be generated during the AM peak hour;nd 3,599 will he generated during the PM peak hour. s ZII_7 Table M-1 COMMERCE PARKVyAY CENTRE TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY -AM PEAK HOUR- -PM PEAK HOUR-, ® LAND USE mrs III OB 'TOTAL IR OB TOTAL ADT ® Trip Gmaatim Rates y i r ' Regional Commercal TSF SD 22 .72 1.42 1.60 3.02 '1.40 Restaurant TSF .82 09 .91 5.0Q 225 7.2S 95.62 Fast Food Restaurant TSF 27.92 27.92 SSS4 1696 1630 3326 63213 Research&Development TSF 1.13 11 1.24 .15 .84 99 6.09 Bank TSF 4.97 3.18 8.15 9.09 11.11 20.20 189.95 Theatre Seat .01 .00 .01 .2a 02 26 1.76 Warcho»se TSF .39 .18 S7 58 93 I56" 4,88 B Trip Generation Alternative A Regional Commercial 716.80 TSF 358 I58 516 1018 II47 2165 24,658 Restaurant 34AO TSF 28 3 31 172 77 249 31289 Fast Food Restaurant 18.00 TSF 503 503 1006 305 293 599 11,378 Research&Development 104.75 TSF 118 12 130 16 88 104 6M Hank 19.70 TSF 98 63 161 179 219 398 3,742 Theatre 960 Seats 10 0, 10 230 19 249 1.690, TOTAL 1,115 739 1,854=;J', 11920 11843 3,763 45,395 5 .t Alternative$ Regional Commercial 716.80 TSF 358 158 516 1,018 1,147 2,165 24,658 Restaurant 27.20 TSF 22 2 24 136 61 197 Z,601 Fast Food Restaumnt 2IS0, ISF 6D0" 600 1,200 365 350` 715 13,591 Research&Development 104.75 TSF, 118 12. 13D 16 88 104 638 Bank 19.70 lvF 98 63 161 179 219 399 3,742 TEeatm. 960 Seats 10 0 10 230 19 249 1,690 TOTAL 1,206 83S 2,041 1,944 1,894 3,= 40,920 Alternative t:- - Regional Commercial 664.60 TSF 332 .146 478 944 1,063 2,007 22AZ Restauraut 29.60 TSF 24 3 27 148 67 215 Z,830 Fast Food Restaurant 9.00 TSF 252 251 502 153 147 3D0 51689 Research&Development 12750 TSF 144, 14 158 19 107 126 776. Bank 2790 73F 139 89 228 254 310' 564 S,3W Theatre 960 Seats 10 0 10 230 19 249 1,6" Warehouse Sa3l 16 50 51 87 138 431 TOTAL 934 $19 1,453 1,799 1,8W 3,599 39,VM Alternative D Regional Commercial 653.00 TST 32a 144 470 927 1,04S 1,972 22.463 Restaurant 38.60 TSF 132 3 3S 193 8Y 280 31691 ® Fast Food Restaurant 9.00 TSF 251 2S1 502 153 147 300 51689 ® Research&Development 127SD TSF 144 14 159 19 107 126 776 Bank 27.90 TSF 139 89 = ^S4 310 564, 5,300 Theatre 960 Seats `, 10 0 10 230 19 Vol, 11690 Warehouse 8830 TSF 34 16 50 SI 87 138 431 TOTAL 936 517 IA53 1827' :,1,862 3,629- 40,040 ion II1-2 t,, mew► W H N li H rri , ! w ili 7 lili I lG II 11 H H. •p{ H. rg it , H ,1 ACID •a I i N�'F�yg1QRk'A'11RSi can � � 11 I l �;lil am SBA ammomom .;1� '� � � way, •� �1 s aflu Y , l !,firm ,1 I I I ® ti "tt I I = w ,;m -. T1 T— I I _ 1l III I ��IiI H E.. fill O I CYO' �yg , ;I a 1 •� i .I t7�-�4 ;ems: it IhnT. P a Ii i�•' � � U 04 tt •I 1 ac :I I I G7 .I 1 I• s 1 � I l;I, 1 :ilii iI . I 1 �yI a III-5 ,,iternative D provides two,additional right-turn only drives«ays along Foothill. The site plan for Alternative D is illustrated in Figure M-4. This alternative consists of a total of 991,300 square feet which generates 40,040 trips daily of which 1453 will be generated during the AM peak hour and 3629 will be generated during the PM peak hour. Distribution of project-generated traffic was derived from RCTM travel patterns in the vicinity of the project site. Figure II1-5 illustrates the routes assumed for travel to and from the projc t site. Project generated intersection volumes for the AM and PM peak hours for each alternative ore illustrated in Figures III-6 through HI 9. TRAFFIC IMPACTS Project-generated traffic -as added to existing counts and to the background volumes s presented in the previous chapter to derive e>,isting-plus-project and background-plus-project AM and PM peak hour volumes. Existing-plus-project and background-pi,s-project ICUS for the four development alternatives are summarized in Table IH-2. As this table indicat,.s, there is no significant difference in the impacts caused by Alternatives A and B. Similarly, there is no significant difference in the impacts ca.lscld by Alternatives C and D. However,Alternatives C and D have :none of an impact on the intersections of Etiwanda at Foothill and Etiwanda at Arrow Highway than do Alternatives A and B. Table.I1I-2 BACKOROUND•PLUS•PROJECr ICU SUMMARY ALTERNATIVE A ALTERNATIVE B ALTERNATIVE C ALTERGATIVE D TNTERSECrION AM PM AM PM AM ' I'M AM PM Edstia¢•PIus-Project 1. I.15 SB&Foothill .54 .57 S6 S7 SO S7< S0. 57, 2'I-15 NB&Foothill .93• 1.29• .96' 131•. .89 1.27• .84 118• 3. Etiwanda.&Foothill 68 S5 .69 .86 .69, its• LQ LI6• 4, Etiwanda&A ^a�iwy S3 6t S3 ' .60 .63 .70 63 r .70 Ba ftminid-Pluc•Proied 1. 1-15 SB k Footbill .83 .63 .83"' 63 £t 62'' S2 .62 'r 2..1.15 NB&Faothiu S9 .72 .61 72 S6 71 .56 71 3. Etlanda&'Foothilt S9` 87• .60 87 - .68 .44• .69 .95• 4.:Eamnda 8t At ttwy 91r 77 91• 77 98•' S34 48 89 Ml III-6 1 , Lli' �j a jI Ij 1i 'ii li •;i;i I' H o� a Ii iI H m H o •, ,l L; W rt z i i it a ® i i i W. ilir W a aim' `` ` III 91 ° ��. � •i�i1 ,lid — -- -- •— _I'lil °aa ;I 4 — I � . III ` IIi=7 N Y EMI 107. 10% a�saae t � 20% 10% 15% nm a s 3 5% o - am - siw ewusr+o eui 1 W FiVire 111 -3 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION III-8 6 At 223,-p r rmi� FOOTHILL 148 � �AA37 _ 614 Z 47 i i I Om 5ZoNN b a� 333 50 4 0� 24�^ 335 M / ouoi Dina 74 ARROW HWY �^~• 36 22Zmwo AM o N 46,369 (;i 0 I II e- 128 FOOTHILL 117aas 255 9 64 a0 12Zorm 4_ 184 0.1¢, 61 M 4tv 576.-►> i� �'n ,o ^ O om �Jt- 129 ARRON;'HWY rt @60 288�` 12_s 55-[s ADM pm Figure III-6 PROJECT GENERATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES A!/3TA.�f ✓s�/lSSOCl�BTd6,hYd ALTERNATIVE A Yal-9 REX Q .� 167 W 241 Wva FOOTHILL s- 161 41 563 z 53--W V 83 A--376 55. w 34-�m t� 24 �2t 0 72 ARROW HWY B r` 51' 23 ZnNa .AM o IK 0II 4 389 i 0.-q. ^0 o 130 FOOTHIU. .0 �� —,—4 m .4- 848 124--'1� 0--:Pl ,g 75� ► � ry 584- �1 n 39 115 ARROW HWY 1 ~508 49 t PM 1 Figure III-7 PROJECT GENERATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES AlISFAY�p!/SF.4�9®Clf1E�S& ALTERNATIVE'B III-1D o � o� a ` i 130 187i - D.-y. ONO m N �:... FOOTH!LL s 252 i as-89`4 sue- 234 26 k 260-1V 13�� . �• h oa '.. 4 20 116 ARROW HWY a- 2p 4 i 4�.mno AM 04� 450 ONO C - FOOTHILL f s- 135 _ .1-,p 571 - Y 45 965.-y 1 135-r 272-1„NO- of< I O 180 Y - ®.. -.:Oh) 810 90-T 540-# I 96�a � � a 9 80 46 ARROW HWY _ 24 J' 332-+29 i 44 10� m� PEA Figure 111-8 PROJECT GENERATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES AWSTI4-FWWBTASS0ffA= ALTERNATIVE C III-1t 29 103 w 187i _ - 0 nno i CON 485. . FOOTHILL rd 253 CC 1 A 9 453��I �I 35�` 39-� nn. 1fi0.Zomn ti - 4-232 a 26 J`a 281 tt 4 27 N ti 116 ARROW HWY 0 621 90 4-D 4�. AM on N o t 451360 _365-i 0'� ,. i 0 38 FOOTHILL r- 554 4 145 980 AA 1�5s asp it 135-! Ii I nm 273-', cin ma foa o m 'L 180 54B-r I 96-y o SON oc)G )ro ei 46 .RROW HWY �1 80 2?_16 337_? 29-s 10-y,s,o PM Figure 1I1-9 PROJECT GENERATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES A(/SPFOlISTAv^Sf�E't.�rS db ALTERNATIVE D III-12 IV. RECOMMENDATIOV,.' f The proposed project wilt generate from 39,518 to 46,920 iars,daily depending upon the development plan chosen. Alternatives A and B will provide better circu'latson throughout the f� project site than Alternatives C and D, with Alternative B being the precerred plan. Although i Alternative B produces the highest trip generation of the four alternatives,the impacts at-:the t intersections studied are not significantly higher than those impacts caused by Alternatives A,C and D. Signs indicating that the internal roadway L not a truck'mute should be placed along the ?1 roadway to prevent the road from becoming a '+g,,;t cut to the freeway for trucks in the area. � III } a IV-1 = ; S1_ APPENDIX IC[J CALCULATION SHEETS I. h i , r r, INTERSECj,IBN CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYS18, City of: Rancho Cucaoonga N19 Street: 1-15 ED Raaps EIW Street: Fop T ll Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing t AIternative A AN Feak Hour Valaaes Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) ..c Background Cnmulat BACKGROUND Protect :DIAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak t CUMULATIVE Peak Vh VIC Existing Proposed Hour V!C Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movecent Capacity Capacity Volume C"Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Land Wrop Lanes NL 0 0 0 0.00 1- 0 0.00 1 ki 0.00'1 0.00 t 9T 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 C. 0.00 %00 NP. 0 0 0 9.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 01 SL 0 0 38 0.00 0 0.00 112 0.00 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.12 f 0 0.12 1 0 0.15 1 0.00'1 _R 0 0 331 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0.00 1 ET 3,200 3,200 558 0.17 0 0.I7 223 0.24 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 511 0.32 0 0.32 0 0.32E 0.00 NL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 ��r 0 0.00 0.00 YT 3,200 3,200 98F 0.31 1 0 0,31 t- 14B 0.55 0.00 aR 1,600 1,600 440 0.29 0 0..9 185 0.39 1 0.0-1 ICU= 0.43 0.43 l 0.54 I1.00 M LOS_ 4 A q p Notes: _ e'Asterisk (1) indicates critical aoveoent. 1, Letel 01 Service. ;> +caffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC., j Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane n n Pro<-.c Number 289:w! Calc.Daze 0122190 INIERSECIT 'a4 CAPACITY ITII.IIAT10N ANALYSIS City of:Rancho Cucanonaa N/S Street: I-15 SR Ramps Elko Street-Foothill Blvd ;plume Conditions:Existing T Alternative A P! Peak Hour Proposed Modification: .une(Existing Cnnditione) Hackpround Cuaulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOiA! Peak BACKGROUND Peak t CUMULATIVE Peak Vic we xistir.g Proposed Hour V/C Hour We Hour Ratio Rab Movement Capacity oacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume k/Exist Lanes H/Prop lanes N! 0 0 0 O.eo t 0, 0,00 1 0 O.G 3 0.00 1 :T 0 0 .1 6.00 0 �'oleo 0 r.00 0.00 'n L 0 2 0.00 0 �CiQO 0 0.00 C.00 e 3L 0 0 15 V.00 0 1,QQ '_42 0.00 3.00 1,200 3,240 0 0.05! C A.05.t 1 �t ti14 O.JO I 0 0 74 0.00 0 0.00 w Me oleo EL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Oleo cT 3,200 3,200 1161 0.36 ! 0 0.36 1-. 384 0.48 t 0,00! ER 1 00 -,,SOO 310 0.21 0 0.23 ,, 0 0.23 Oleo AL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 ! 0 0.00 1 0.00 ! :T .200 3}200 1037 0.32 0 0.32 364 0.44 :,50 xR ..6i0 1T600 250 C.16 $ 0.16 461 0.44 0.00 _ ICU= 0.41 0.41 0.57 0.00 w LOS= A A A A ?totes: al Asterisk l!l indicates critical xovement. b)LOS=Level Of Service. =l Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA 5E.4VICES} INC. 31 Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane PFA'Project Number 284.001 C3Ic. Date: 01122/90 ,r - INTERSECTION CAPACITY 'UTIL11AtISN 4HALGYSIS ... City of: Raachd Cucamonga aid Slreet: I-15 NB Ramps, EIN Street:FocthM 'Blvd Volune Conditions zisting +AIternative A AM Peak Hour VOlrws Proposed Modification: hone (Ezisting Conditions) Background Cusulat PAC_R➢Uh1 2rolect TOTAL 'IIFAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +C➢H-:.ATIVE Peak VIC Vic Existing Proposed hour VPC Hour C Hour Ratio Ratio- Movement C,acity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume, Ra io Volume ulExist Lanes wiPro,_',anes i 0 445 0.00 rf :.00 ^ 3.0 Oleo IT ',200 3.200 1 .3.25 t 3 e.2:t 0 ?.w t M13 t SR ?40 0.00 0 oleo ,iS v0 JC 0 0 0 oleo t 0 oleo t t ST a 0 1.06 0 0.00 R 0 0 0 oleo 0 0.9,1 0 t?.00 v.00 EL 1,600 1,600 110 0.07 t 0 0.014 0 0.07 t Mo t ET 3.`.00 3,200 445 0.14 0 0.14 :35 ',0.24' '+00; ER 0 0 0 0.00 0 oleo .1 oleo 0.00 NL 3 0 0 0.00 C 0.00 0 0.00 oleo HT 3.200 3;200 1.82 0.43 t t} 0,4.%I gat v4 t alga L AR i.600 1,600 10 0.05 0 0.05 ." '4 <~ 045 0. o ILO 0.75 0.75 ;J.'13 0.00 LOS= C C E A Votes: f� a) Asterisk tt) indicates critical aoviaent. 6) L05=Level Of Service c) 'lase traffic VoIui:es soLrce: DATA SERVICES, INC. Capacity based on 1600 VPH(Lane r -� AFA Project Number 285.001 Calc. ',late: 0117*0 r' I N T E R 9 CI10N ,CAPACITY 0TILIIATI0;tANALY. IS City;af. Rancho Gucaoonga M1� NIS Street: I-15 113 Rasps EIN Street: Foott4l B1v0 f Y�IuoeCmndiLions: Existing t Alternative A Pt4,Peak Pour Proposed Modification: None.tExisting Conditions) Background Cuoulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak t CUMULATIVE Peak ,y%r YX J Eaieting Proposed Hour ciw. Hoor VIC Hour patio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity ' Volume Rays'` Volume ;P,atio Volume 4/Exist Lanes 4/Prop Lanes NL" 0 v 468 0.00 0 4.00 1 0.0 0.00 !IT 3,200 's,200 0 X t .A7 0E35 t.- 0.50 2 NR 0 0 662 0.00 0 0:00 430 0.00 a u0 PL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t t.00 t ST J 0 0 0.00 0' 0'.6 0 0.00 1.0 SR 0 0 0.00 J 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 _,600 113 0.26 t 0 0.26 t 0 0.26 t 0.00 1 ET 3,20? 3,200 864 0.27 0 0.27 576 0.45 0.04 :R 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 ?+ 0.01 0.00 sL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0100 n 0.00 0.00 9-T 3,200 3,20C ' 872 0.27 t 0 0.27 t 830 0.533 t 0.00 4 AR 1,600 1,600 73 0.05 0 0.05 184 0.16 0.00 i ICU= 0.88 0.88 1.24 0.00 iDS 0 D F A . Notes: all" aI Ast=_risk (1) indicates critical auveaent. t)LOS=Leval Of Service. -► Base traffic volumEs source: TRAF,I"-DATA SERVICES, INCs d)Caca_i't oased on 1600 WHILanE A=A Project Nutter 289.001 Calc. rate:° 0112219 I111ER5ECTI0N .CAPACITY UTIL.IZAt10N ANALYSIS,;: City of: R'ncho Cucamonga HIS Street: Etimanda Ave EIN Street..Foq.`l! Blvd @ Volume Condition;. Existing+Alternative A Ali Peak Hour Proposed Modificatu t: None (Existing Cpnditions► Existing Cuoulat EXISTING Project TOTAL, IOTAL Psa. EXISTING Peak +CUKLIATI14E Desk We' Vic cxistin4 P oposed How VIC Hour nIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Volune Ratio Volume Ratio Volume vIExist Lanes WfPror banes NL 0 0 82 E.00 is 0 0.00 r NT 1,600 1,600 93 0.14 0 0.14 28 MS 0.00 i i NR 0 " 49 0.00 0 9."0 27 0.00 0,00 SL 0 0 24 0.00 0 0.6. 0 0,00 u.90 ST 1,600 h64R 122 0.15 B 0 0.15 t 38 0.22 1 . Mo t., SR 0 0 89 0.00 0 0.00 T3 0.00 0.00' J `EL 1,600 1,600 69 0.06 t 'i 0.0 46 0.07 t 0.00 x f !' ET 3,200 3,200 650 0.23 0 040 47 0.25 0.00 ¢ ER 0 0 % 0.00. 0 0.00 5 0.00 0.00 aL 1.600 1,500 `B 0.05 0 0.05 37 0.06 Mu- WT 3,200 �o 11148 0.37 z 0 0.37 t 75 0.3q 1 0.00 t {` kR 0 ^ 2B 0.00 0 0.00 0 0«0'A 0.00 :ug 0.57 0.57 0._3 0.00 16 LDS= A A B A I'. l atesi al Asterisk (i( indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. i Z} Base Traffic volumes source-, TRAFFIf hATA SERVICES, INC" dj Capacity based an 1600 VPH/lane AFA Froject Number 289.001 Calc. Date: 01122/9) „. V. i F HIER 5_ CTION:" 'CAMACITY 0TILIIATl0,H- 2NAL't5IS City of: Ran0a Cu'ai, .Jd - N/S Street: Etiwand'a Ave E/H Siren. Foothill Bivd Volume Conditions: Existing+Alternative A PH Peak Hour, i Proposed Modification. None (Existing Conditions) Existino C nulattX15:IN6 projectiOTAL TOTAL Peak " EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V/C Exisl,no Proposed Hour V/C Hour Vic flour Ratio Ratio Movement Capecity Capacity Value Ratio Vcluee Ratio Volume it/Exist Lanes u/Prop lanes ` uL i 0 0 136 0.00 C 9:00 0.00 L tiE L,bGQ 115a0 155 0.26 t 0 0.26 9 67 0.34 t , 0.00 2 "= Nft 0 0 125 O.CQ ?= 0.00 6E 0.00 0.00 3t u 0 34 000 1 0 - 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 I ST 1.600 1,00 79 0.10 0 0.10 65 0.22 0.00 SR 0 0 41 0.00 -0 0.00 127,' 0.0 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 75 0.05 fi 0.05 117 0.12 01,00 ET 3,200 3,200 1223 0.41.3 0 0.41 : 116 0.45'1 04(i t I ER 0 0 76 0.00 0.0 12 " �.00 6.00 UL 1,600 1,600 48 0.05 t 01 0.6 t 64 0.07 1 0.00 t WT 3,200 3,200 651 0.32 0 0.22 128 0.26 0.00 dR 0 0 53 0.00 L 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.72 0.12 0.85 0.00 LOS= C " C E. A Notes: a) Asterisk M indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Srrvice. c) Base traffic va uaes source: 1RAFFIC DATA SEftVICEt, IN(::' d) Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Hurter 269.001 Calc.Date: - 01122/90 I. _ INTER'SECTIBI CAPACITY UIILIIAT10K AHALYSI3 City of: Rancho Cucamonga vs StreEt: Etiwanda Ave E!k street: Arrow Hwy Volume >onditions.- Existing*Alternative A A):Peak Hour Proposed Mmdification: None (Existino Conditions) Existing C,aukat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING P^ k +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC Vic Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour` VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Tlaveeent Capacity Capacity VoIuae Ratio- Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes wlProp Lanes NL 1,600 1,600, 114 0.07 1 0 0.07 t 38 Met 0.00 t ltT 1.600 I,600 144 M1 0 ' 0.11 :S 0.17 0.00 NR 0 0 27 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 .! 1.600 1,600 ib 0.05 .r 0 0.05 1 0.05 0.00 ST 1.600 1,600 222 0.1E t 0 0.14 t- i5 0.1S t 0.00 t SR 0 0 71 Oven, 0 040 0 9.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,605 33 0.05 t 0 0.05 1 5 0.05 t 0.00 t ET 1,600 1,600 98 ' 0.06 0 0.06 ?' 0.08 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 91 0.06 0 Q.66 ?2 0.07 0.00 al 1,600 1,600 102 0.06, 0 0.06 0 0,06 4.00 NT "0 1,600 261 0.16 1 0 0.16 i 36 0.11 1 0.00 1 NR 1,600 1,600 34 0.05 0 0.05 L4 0.0.5 0.00 ICU= 0.46 0.46 0153 0.00 LOS= A F. A "i Notes: a) AstErisk M indicates critical movement. b) LO5=Lvel Of Service. c) 9ase traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d).apacity based on 1600 VPHILane AFA Project Number 299.001 Ca1c. Date: 01l22C90 ll C1. .. b IaTERSECTI0N CAPACITY U'TILIIATI0N ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga j N/S Street: Etiwanda Ave E/A Street: Arrow Hwy Volute Conditions: Existing , Alternative PM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peek EXISTING Paak +CUMULATIVE Peak -VIC Vic Existing Proposed' Hour Vic Hour Vic Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity laiume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes 'L 1,640 11600 60 0.05 0 0.05 65 0.08 0.00 1,600 1,600 244 0.23 1 0 023 t 31 0.25 1. 0.00 t (i NR 0 0 71 0.00 0 0.00 ti 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 27 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 37 0.05 1 D.OQtt ST 1,600 1,600 107 0.08 0 0.08 36 0.10 0.00 SR 0 0 20 0.00 0 0.60 0 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,640 112. 0,07 0 0.07 �' 12 0.48 0.00, ET 1,600 1,600 355 0.22 t 0 0,.22 t 55 •,).26 t 0.00 1 ER 1,600 1,600 126 0.00 I'D 0.08 56 0.11 0.00 9L 1,600 1,600 38 0.05 4 0 0.05 t Q Q.05 t 0.00 t kT 1,600 1,600 115 0.07; 0 0.07 64 0,11 0.00 NR 1,600 1,600 41 0:5 0 1.05 32 0.05 0.00 ICU= 0.55 0.55 0.61 0.00 L.3_ A A ® A Notes: a) Asterisk It) indicates critical sovement. b)'LOS=Level Of Service. �. ') Base traffic volumes source., TRAFFIC DATA SERVICEF, INC. d)Capacity based on 1600 VPHlLane AFA Project NuP6er 289.001 Caic. Date: 41122110 f� r, IN TERSEC`T10N E$PAGI'TY U,TILII°hTI01 ANALYSIS ' City �1: Rancho Cucamon¢a NIS Street: I-15 69 Ramps Pv Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Exi=cing +Alternative B AM Psak Hour Vg;Umes Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) 1 4 Existing Cusulst EXISTING ?reject TOTAL. TOTAL Peak EXISTING iak +CUMULATIVZ Peak VIC VIC Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour Vic Hour Ratio Ratio ® Movetent Capacity Capacity Voltoe Rativ -Volume Ratio Volume 0A, lanes WFrop Lanes rNL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0.00 t- NT 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.0,0 0 0.00 0.00 NR 0 0 0 `0.00 0 0.00 0 4.00 0100 SS. 0 0 38 0.00 0 0.00 In 4.Ou 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.12 t ) 0.12 t 0 0.15 t 0.00,t SR 0 0 331 0.00 1 0.00 : 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0,00 0 3.00 1 0.00 t ET 3,200 3,200 553 0.17 0 0.1' 241 0.25 0.00 ER 1 600 1.600 511 -0.32,t 0 0.32 t 0 0.3e 0.00 NL , 0 0 0.00 t 0 OA t 0 0.00 0.00 IT 3,200 3,Y00 985 Q.31 0 0.31 167 0.36 9.00 NR 1,600 1,600 440 0.28 0 O.2B 209 0.41 1 0.00 i 1CU= 0.44 0.44 0.56 0.00 ® LpS= A A A A Notes: a) Aetcrisk (t) .idicates critical movement. 6)LUh=Level Of Service. el Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES,,'INC. o) Capacity based on 1600 VPHILane AFA Prq;ect Humber 289.001, Calc. Date: 0114M INTERSECTION C A P A C r T Y J.TILIZATI0N ANALYSIS City'f: Rancho Cucaaonga NIS Street: I-15 SB Rasps EfYP Street: foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing+Alternative B Ph'Peak Noun "roposed Modification- None (Existing Conditions) r ' (a Existing CesuIat EXISTINS Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE feai ViC VIC xi,li r Proposed Hour Vic Hour Vic Hour Ratio Ratio Navea,nt Capaci:t Capacity Vdla®e Patio Volume Ratio Volume w/E;ist Lanes wlProp Lanes NIL 4 G 0 0'.04 t 0 0.99 k 9 0.01"# 0.00 t 4T 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 n�0 )IR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0& 0.00 SL 0 0 15 0.00 0 0.00 195 0.00 0.00 ST 31200 3,200 0 0.05 1 0 0.05 1 0 0.09 1 0.00 2, SR 0 0 79 D'.0a, 0 0.00 ' 0 0..00 0,00 EL 0 0 0 0.00'. 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00( ET 3,200 3,200 1161 0.36 t 0 0.36 t 389 0.48 t 0.00 t ER 1,600 1,600 370 0.23 0 0.23 0 0.23 0.00 WL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 A 0.00 t NT 3,200 3,.00 1037 0.32 0 0.32 377 0.44 0.00 iR 1,600 1,600 25t 0.16 0 0,16 471 0.45 0100 ICU= 0.41 0.41 : 0.57 0.00 LOS= A A A A Notes. o a) Asterisk (S) indicates critical k-vement. b)LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic valeoes source: TP.AFFIe DATA SERVICES, INC. d3 Capacity based an'.600 VPH/Lane AFA Proje.t Nuaber 287401 Calc, Date: 01127.;99 } i, { N G t 1 ll ,: INTERSECTI8N CAP(VCITY"'UT`,LIIATI,AN ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga His Street: I-15`•+4.Ramps Elk Street: foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing +Alternative B AM Peak Hour Proposed Nodificatinna None (Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTING, Project TOTAL,-, TBTAL Peak EXISTING Peak f CUHULATIVE Peak Vic V/C Existing Proposed Hoar V/C Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Noverent Capacity Capacity Volute Ratio Volume Ratio Volume H/Exist Lanes Wrop Lanes NL 0 0 448 0.60 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 `(T 3,200 3,200 0 0,25 t 0 0.25 1 0 0.34 I 0.00 1 RR 0 0 340 0.00 0 0.00 301 0.00 0.00 St. 0 0 0 0100 t 0 0.00 t 3 0.00 t 0.04 t ST 0 4 0 0,00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SR 0: 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 110 0.07 t 0 0.9-t 0 r 07 1 OAO t ET 3,200 3,200 448 0.14 0 0.14 362 0.25 0.00 ER 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 kL 4 ' 0 9.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 4.00 VT 3,20n 3,200 1362 0.43 t 0 0.43 t 316 4.55 t 0.00 NR I,a00 1,600 10 0.05 0 0.05 B3 0.06 0.00 ICU= 0.75 0.75 0.96 0.00 LOS= C E Notes: a)Asterisk Ill indicates Critical movement. 6) LOS=LeveI Of Service, c) Base traffic volumes snurce: TRAFFIC DATA SEVICES, INC. d) Capacity based on 16%VPH/Lane APA Pr2lect Husker 28?J01 Ca1c. Date. = 01/22190 �s 1NIERSECTIUN CAPACITY UTILIIATI0N ANALYSIS City of: RancSa'Cucaminga _ We Street: 1-15 N3 Ramps E/k Street: Foothill Bl:d Volute;onditio:,s Existing +AIterno:ive 8 PH Peak Hour Proposed Modification None [Existing Conditions) Existing Cueulat EXISTINB Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTINB Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Y/C Vic Existing Proposed Hour .We Hour Y/C Hour Ratio B;tio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Aatio Volute Ratio Volute alExist Lanes x'Prop Lanes " NL 0 0 468 0.00 0 0.00 0 � 0-00 ,/f 0.00 NT 3,200 3,200 0 0.35 1 0 0.35,1 0 0.51 NR 0 0 662 0100 0 0.00 486 0.00�/j 0.00 Sri SL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 i ^- 0.00 t 0.00 1 -ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 ~`�"%00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0:�0 0.00 EL 1,600 1,60 413 0.26 t 0 0.26 t 0 016 t 0.00 4 ET 3,200 3,20D 864 0.27 0 0.27 584 f; 0.45 0.00 i' Cf 0 0 0 0.00 0 0,00 0 0.00 0.00: ' uL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 040 O.t) NT 3,200 3,200 972 0.27 1 0 0.27 1 840 0.54 4 0.00 t 4 1,600 1,600 73 0.05 0 0.05 leg 0.16 °.00 ;i ICU= 0.88 0.09 1.31 b.64 LOS= D D F A , i, !Totes: �1 a) Asterisk indicate;critical ttive�ieni. b) LOS=Level Di Service. .) P3se traffic voluses source: TRAFFIS DATA SERFICES, INC. d? Capacity bised an 1600 YPH/Lane Ky tY tA AFA;Project Number 287.001 Calc. Date; Oi'17 I90 ! 11 INTERSECTION CAPACITY CrTILIZAT104 ANALYSI`S, 4� City nf: Rancho Cucamonga.. w HIS Street: Etiaanda Ave E/Y Street: Foothill Blvd Volute Conditions: Existing +Alternative B AN Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) ' Existing Pumulat EXISTlhn Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTINS Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hdur V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volute Ratio Volume Ratir. Volume a/Exist Lanes 'a/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 08 0.00 t 0 0.00 4 0 0.00 t 0.00 t 4T 1,600 1 600 93 0.14 0 0.14 30 0.18 0.00 NR 0 0 48 0.00 0 0.00 30 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 ' 24 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1,600 1,600 122 0.15 1 0 3.1, t 40 0.22 I 0.00 t SR 0 0 84 0.00 0 0..00 6i 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 69 0.05 t 0 0.05 1., 54 0.08 t 0.00 1 ET 3,200 3,200 650 0.23 0 0.23 53 0.25 0.00 ER 0 0 46 0.00 0 0.00 5 0 00 0.01 NL 1,600 1,600 58 0.05 0 0.05 41 0.06 0.00 YT 3,200 3,200 1148 0.37 t 0 037 t 80 0.34 2 0.00 R #R 0 0 2B 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.57 0.57 0.69 0.00 I 9 LOE= A A B A Notes. a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc. Date: 01122/90 am j; ;r _ 1 I :TE 9SECTI0N CAPACITY U I I L I N ANALY-9I5,_, City of: Rancho Cucamonga 11/5 Street:;Et3Manda Ave ! E14 street: Foothill BIvd= Volume Conditions: Existing +Alternative B PM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: Nan•iExisting Conditions) Existing Cumula, EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic U/C Existing Proposed Hour Vic Hour WC Hour Ratio Ratio " Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio '/olume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Canes NL 0 0 13,4 C.00 0 0.00 > 0 0.00 0.00 .` NT 1.600 1,600 155 0.26 1 0 0.26 1 70 0.35`C 0.00 1 NR 0 0 125 0.00 0 0.00 SL 0 0 34 0.00 9 0 v.,^t 0 0.00 1 0.60 1 ST 1,600 1,600 79 0.10 0 0.10 64 0.22 0.00 SR -J) 41 0.00 0 0.00 130 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 76 0.05 0 0.05 119 0.12 0.00 ET 3,200 3,200 1223 0.41 t 0 0.41 1 1:9 0.45 1 0.00 t ER 0 0 76 0.00 0 0.00 15 0.00 0.00 RL 1,600 1,600 433 0.05 1 0 0.05 t 64 , 0.01 t 0.00 S I NT 3,i00 3,200 651 0.22' 0 0.22 0 O. u 0.60 NR 0 0 53 0.00 0 0.00 J O.Ju 0.00 ICU- 0.72 0.72 O.Sa ~0.00 LDS= C C D p Notes: i a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. b)LOS=Level.Of Service. 0 Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane ; AFA Project Humber 289.001 Calc. Date: 01122/90 r1 1 r F; INTbRSECT10N CAPACITY; UTILIZATION"-- ANALYSIS City nf: Rancho Cucamonga HIS S:-het: Etioanoa Aw- EIN Street: Arran Hmy ' Volume Conditi6s: Existing +Alternative B AM Peak Hour Prraosed Modificatian:None (Existing Condit}gns) ` 1 rzistinq Cumulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL ® Peaky, t.`ISrING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC 8/ Existing Proposed Hour Vic Hour VIC Ho-ar Ratio Ratio .�' Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume alExist Lanes N/Prop.Lanes HL 1,600 1,600 114 0.07 0 0.07 t 36 0.09 2 0.00 t 4T 1,600 1,600 144 0.11 0 0.11 `l4 0.12 0.00 NR 0 0 27 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.10 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 16 0.05 0 0.05 20 0.05 0.00 ST 1,600 1,600 222 O.IB t 0 0.18 1 19 0.20 1 O,Ot SR 0 0 71 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 33 0.05 t 0 0.05 1 5 0.05 t 0.00 1 ET 1,600 1,600 98 0.06 0 0.06 22 0.08 0.00 ER 1,101 1,600 91 1.06 0 0,06 23 0.07 0.00 NL 1,600 1,600 102 ;0.06 0 0.06 0 0.06 0.00 YT 1,600 1,6,7O 261 6.16 1 0 0.16 1 36 0.19 1 0.00 t WR 1,600 1,600 34 0.05 0 0.05 24 0.05 0.00 fill ICU= 0.46 0.46 0.53 0.00 LOS= A A - A A Notes: a) Asterisk M indicates critical moveoeet. bb LOS=Level Of Service cl Base traffic veluses sources. TRAFFIC➢AIA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 VKOnzn AFA Project Humber 289.601 Calc.➢ate; Otf42190 .. a AWN A� 71, 1NTERSECT10H CAPACITY UTILI7ATION,'pn:YL�YSIS�: City of: Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street: Etivanda Ave 'c/N Street: Arrow Hay Volume Conditions Existing'x Alternative B PM Peak Hour ., Proposed Modification. None(Existing Conditians) : existing Cuaulat EXISTING Project TOTAL ;ZAL ..Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V/C Existing Proposed' Hour V/C Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio ® Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volute Ratio Volume WExist Lanes w/Prep Lanes NL 11600 1.600 60 0.05 0 0.05 58 0.07 0.00 1� NT 1,600 1,600 294 0.23 t 0 0.23 t 39 0.25 t 0.00 2 ;' SR 0 ) 71 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL ,600 1,600 27 0.05 t 0 0.05 t Ir 0.04 1 0.00 t ST 1,600 1,600 '07 0.08 0 0.09 4r 0.1t 0.00 i £ 0 0 20 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 u.00 EL 1,600 1,600 112 0.07 0 0.07 15 0.08 0.00 ET 1,600 1,600 305 0.22 1 0 6.22 t 49 0.25 1 0.00 t ER 1,600 1,600 126 0.08 0-, 0.08 49 0.11 0.00 NL 1,600 1,600 38 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 0 0.051 0.00 t NT 1,600 11600 115 0.07 0 0.07 to 0.11 0.00 dR 1,600 1,60t 41 v.05 0 0.05 :9 0.05 _ 0.00 l s ICU= 0.55 0.55 _ 0.60 0.00 LOS= A A A A a)xisterisk (t) indicates critical movement, 6)US=Level Cf Service. c)Daee traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. S` d)Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane 7 , AFA Proiec• r' 289.001 = Calc.Date: 01/22/90 u ' l INTERSECTION CAPACITY UT IL17AT10N ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga N/S Strc.t: I-15 Sa Ramps E/W€treet: Foothill Slvd Volume Conditions.• Existing+Alternative C AN Peak Hour Volumes ProposedModification: None (Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTIN6 PrF;jrt TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTINS Peak +GUNULAEIVE Peak Vic V/ Existing f ^ei -'sour 41C Hour V/G Hour Ratio Ratio , ',foveoent rapacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume, wiExist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 0 0�00 1 0 3.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t IT ' 0 0 1,11 1' 1,10 0 0:a0 0.00 NR 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.0.0 SL 0 0 3B 0.00 0 0.00 93 0.00 0.30 ST !.Zoo 3,200 0 0.12 t 0 0.12 1 0 0.14 t 0.00 t SR 0 0 331 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0J; 0.00 ET 3,200 3,200 558 0.17 0 4P 187, .23 '- 0.00 ER 1.600 1,600 511 0.32 t 0 ,32 1 0 0.32 ::; ,0.00 WL 0 O 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 3 0.00 0.00 UT 3,200 3,200 9B5 0.31 0 6.31 109 0.34 0.00 dR 1,d00 I'm 440 0.28 0 0.28 "_' '30 0.36 t 0.00 1 d It 0.tl 0.44 0.EO O.0't A A A A Notes: a) Asterisk (1) indicat4s critical aovecent. b) LOS=Level Of Servica. c)Bass traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SEAvICES, INC. d) Capacity based on C600 VPH/Lane 4 AFA Project Numher 289.001 Calu late: 01/22tq'*,t � �` t� INIERSECTIBu^' CAPACIr'Y U'TIL11ATI9N ANALY5.IS City of: Rancho Cucamonga ` NIS Street: 1-i5 SB Ramps E/W Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Canditionc. Existing+Alternative C PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: Nona (Existing Conditions) KI Existing Cumulat EXISTI46 Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTIN6 Peak *CUMULATIVE Peak V/C VIC Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour Vic Roar Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume „Ratio Volume a[Exist Lanes mlFrop Lanes NL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t NT 0 0 0 0.00 0 0;00 0 0.00 0.00 NR 0 0 0 040 0 0.00 6 0,60 0.00 SL 0 0 15 0.00 0 0.00 w 0.00 0.00' ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 0 0.09 t 0.00 t SR 0 0 79 0.00 0 0.00 A: 0,00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 tc a.80 0.00 E7 3,200 3,200 1161 0.36 t 0 0.36 t 36^ 0.48 t 0.00 t ER 1,600 11600 370 0.23 0 0.23 0 0.21. 0.00 XL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t l kT 3,200 3,200 1037 0.32 0 0.32 360 0.44 0.00 l WR 1,600 1,600 250 0.16 0 0.16 450 0,44 0.00 ii r� ICU= 0.41 0.41 0.57 0.00 ` L05= A A A A �I Notes lei a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. b) L➢S=Level Of Service. c)Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INS. d) Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane r7 AFA Project Numbs 289.001 Calp.Date: 01/22/90 111TER6ECT10N ''CAPAC'IIY UTILIZATION A,iA1.YSIJS i City of: RancFo Cucamonga HIS Street: I-15 NB Ramos E/N Street: foothill Blvd Iwo Volume Conditions: Existing +Alternative C At''Pe:k Haut Volumes t Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTIHE Project i�lTOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTINS Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V/C I Existing Proposed hour V/C Hour Vic Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Value Ratio Volume Ratio Volume s/Exk,; Lanes w/Prop Lanes N�. 0 0 448 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 IT i,200 3,200 0 0.25 E 1 0.25 E 0 0.32 t 0.00 t h 0 0 340 .0.60 0 0.00 234 0.00 0.00 r+J SL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 E 0 0.00 0.00 t 5T 0 0 0 0.00, 0 0.00 C 0.00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00- 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 110 O.f7 t 0.07E 0 047 E 0.00 E ET 3,200 3,200 440 0.14 0 ' 0.14 HO 0.23 0.00 EN 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 kL 0 0 0 0.04 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 RT 3,200 3,200 1382 0.43 t 0 OX t 234' 0.51 1 0.00 t - NS 1,600 1,600 10 0.05 0 0.05 52 0.05 0.00 ICU= 0.75 0.75 0.39 0.00 LDS= C C D A Notes a) Asterisk (E) indicates critical movement. 6) LOS=Level Of Service. 0 Base traffic vclu®es source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC'. d)'Capacity based on 1600 VPN/Lane AFA Prt,ect Number 289.001 Cale.Date: 01122110 t� IN7ER9E'CTI0N CAPACITY UTIL17AT10N ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga' " NIS StrerC: 1-15 KB Ramps EfD Street: Foothill Blvd r_ Uoluae Conditions: Existing +Alternative C PM Peak Hour Voluo:, / Proposed Modificatira: None(Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTING project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC V/C Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC Mobr Ratio Ratio Movesent Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volute w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 46B 0.00 0 0,00 0 0.00 0.00 NT 3,2Q0 3,200 0 0.35 1 0 0.35 1 0 1.19 1 1,11 1 NR 0 0 662 O.Oor 0 0.00 450 0.00 0.00 5L 0 0 0 0.00 1 0 0 00>" 0 0.00 A 0.00 f ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.01 0 0.00 o.00 SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 6.Ju 0 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 413 Or2b 1 0 0.26 i 0 0.26 t 0.00 t - ET 3,200 3,200 $64 0.27 0 0.17 540 0.44 0.00 ER 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ML 0 0 0 C.00 0 0.00 0 �0.00 0.00 RT 3,200 3,200 872 0.27 t 0 0.27 t B14 0.53 t 0.00 1 WR !,boo 1,600 73 0.05 0 0.05 180 0.16 0.00, ICU= 0.88 O.BB 1.27 0.00 LOS= D D F A Notes: a) Asterisk it) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d)Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane r � r AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc, Date: 01/22/90 J J` : HTERSECI10H =CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYS11 City of: Rancho Cucamonga 411/5 Street: Etiaanda Ave F/N Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing+Alternative C AN Peak flour Volumes Proposed Modification: None (Exist;'ig Conditions) l Existing '" Cuoulat EXISTING Project TOTE_ TOTAL Peak EXISTING ''Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V/C Existing °roposed Hour V/C Hour V/C Hour." Ratio- Ratio Movement Capacity rapacity Volu3e Ratio Vclume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes FL 0 0 88 0.00 t a 0.00 t 111 0.00 `,00 SIT 1,600 1,600 ?F 0.11 0 0.14 16 0.23 1 0.00 1 ;Ift 0 0 A 0.00 0 0.00 13 ',0.00 4.00 SL 0 0 24 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 t . 0.00 t ST 1,600 1,600 12? 0.�1 0 0.15 t 27 'ii, 0.21 0.00 SR 0 0 99 0.09 0 040 66 ,'! 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 69 0;05 t 0 0.05 t 36 f' 0.07 t 0.00 t ET 3,200 3,260 650 0,23 0 0.23 39 0.30 0.00 ER 0 0 9b 0.00 0 0.00 160 0.00 0.00 HL 1,600 1,600 58 0.05 0 0.05 9 0.05 0.00 IT 3,210 1,210 1111 0,17 1 0 0,11 1 14 0,31 t 1,10 1 WR 0 0 28 0.00 0' '0 - 0 0.00 0.40 ® dCU= 0.57 0.57 0.69 0.00 LDS= A A B 1 Notes: a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movuaent. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane E AFA Project Nucbur 289.061 Cale.Date: 01/22/90 �r IITERSECTI0t1 CAPACITY 9T1LIIATI011 ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga 4/S Street: Etiaanda Ave E/R Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing +Alternative C PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: Aoue.(Existing Conditions) Existing Cuoulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTINS Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC V/C Existing Frnpot Hour VIC Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capicit,., Voiupe Ratio Volume Ratio Volume x/Exist Lanes w/P-op Lanes NL 0 0 136 0.00 0 0.00 376 0.00 0.00 9T 11600 1,600 155 0.26 t V" 0.26 t 64 0.�6 1 0.00 1 MR 0 0 125 0.00 0 0.00 45 0.00 0.00 SL ll 0 34 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 ,,' 0.00 1 0.00 1 ST 1,600 1,600 79 0.10 0 0.10 � ' 0.21 0.00 SR 0 0 }1" 0.00 0 0.00 128/ 0.00 0.00 EL 17600 1,600 76 0.05 0 0.05 116 0.12 0.00 ET 3,200 3,200 1223 0.41 t 0 0.41 1 135 0.55 f 0.00 t ER 0 0 76 0.00 0 0.00 272 0.06 0.00 bL 1,600 1,600 43 0.05 1 0 0.05 t 45 0.06 t 0.00 t WT 3,200 3,200 651 0.22 0 0.22 135 0.26 0.00 NR 0 0 53 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ICU 0.72 0.72 1.15 0.00 LOS= C C F A Notes: a) Asterisk M indicztes critical sovement, b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d)Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane. AFA Project Number 289.001 Ca1c. Date: 01/22/90 I4TER:SECT10N CAPACITY UTILI .ATIBN ANALYSIS is City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: Etieanda Ave E/A Street: Arrcn Hwy oluce Conditions: Existing +Alternative C AM Peak Hour Volume Proposed Iodification: None (Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic VIC Existing Proposed Hw!r Vic Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio !Iolume-w/Exisk Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 114 0.07 t 0 0.07,1( 4 G.JB t 0.00 t ;)T 1,600 1,600 144 0.11 0 0.11 38 0.13 0.00 MR 0 0 27 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 16' 0.05 0 0.05 21 0.05 0.00 ST 1,600 1,600 222 0.18 4 0 0.18 t 22 0.29 t 0.00 t SR 0 0 71 0.00 0 0.00 146, 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 33 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 90 0.08 t 0.00 t r ET 1,600 1,600 9B 0.06 0 0.06 4 0.06 0.0.9 ER 1,600 1,600 91 0.06 0 0.06 4 0.06 0.00 'aL 1,600 1,600 102 0.06" 0 0.06 0 0.06 0.00 kT 1,600 1,600 261 0.16 1 0 0.16 t' 27 O.LB t 0.00 t BR 1,600 1,600 34 0..05 0 0;05 20 0.05 0.00 ICU= 0.46 0.46" 0.63 0.00 LOS= A A B A Notes: a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. ^) Base traffic volumes source, TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc. Date: 01/22/90 INTERSECTION CAPACITY U T I L I Z A T 1 0 N ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga; N/S Street;Etiwanda Ave E/N Street: Arrow Hey Voluee Conditions: Existing+Alternative C PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed_Modification: None (Existing Conditions) r) i "! Existing Cumulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V/C Existing Proposed &Lr 'V/C Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Moveaent Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 60 0.05 0 0.05 4 0.05 0.00 IT 1.600 1,110 294 0.21 1 0 0.23 t 86 0.28 1 0.00 t NR 0 0 71 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 27 0.05 t 0 0.05 1 61 0.06 t 0.00 t ST 1,600 1,600 107 0.08 0 :` 0.08 80 0.28 0.00 SR 0 0 20 0.00 0 0.00 234 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 112 0.07 0 0.,07 332 0.2B t 0,00 t' ET 1,600 1,600 355 0.22 t 0 022 1 29 0.24 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 126 0.08 0 0.08 10 0.09 0.00 kL 1,600 1,60.' 38 0.05 t 0 0.054 0' 0.05 0.00 NT 1,600 1,600 115 0.07 0 0.07 10 0:08 / 0.00 t NR 1,600 1,600 41 0.05 0 0.05 BO O.OB 0.00 ICU= 0.55 0.5 0.70 5 0.00 LOS= A A B A Notes: a) Asterisk M indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based an'1600 VPH/Lane APA Project Number 2BY.001 Calc. Date: 01122)90 'i INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIIATI08 ANALYS S City of: Rancho Cucamonga H/S Street: I-15 SB Ramps 'E/R Street: Facthill Blvd Volute Conditions: Existing +Alternative D AM Peak Hour Volumes l Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTING Protect TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUNW.ATIVE Fee. Vic Vic. Existing .Proposed Hour Vic Hour 1,1C Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volvme Ratio Volume Ratio Volume H/Exist Lanes k/Prop Lanes .. tL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t tIT 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 NR 0 4 9 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 O.PO SL 0 0 38 0.00 0 0.08 44 0.00 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.12 t 0 0.12 I 0 0.14 r . %OQ I SR 0 0 331 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 040 EL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 t 0.00 L ET 3,200 3,204 559 0.17 0 0.17 1_87 0.23 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 511 0.32 t 0 0.32 t 0 0.32 0.00 WL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 I 0 0.00 0.00 'AT 3,200 3,200 985 0.31 0 0.31 103 0.34 0.00 kR 1,600 1,600 440 0.28 0 0.2B 129 0.36 I 0.00 t ICU= 0.44 0.44 0.50 0.00- LOS= A- A A A 1 Notes ' �'' a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source. TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d)Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 289.001 ? Calc. Date: 01/22/90 t F- INTERSECT'I➢N CAPACITY UTILIIAI10N. ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamana_a r NIS s`reet: I-15 SB Ramps E/N Street: foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing+Altaroative➢PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: )lone (Existino Condition Existing Cuvulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak - EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V/C Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour V/C Hour Ratan Rates Movement Capacity Capacity 11911112 Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes- w/Pre'{Lanes r.t NL 0 0 e 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t P.00 t 'IT 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0' 0.00. ......,_ 0.00 NR 0 0 0 0 00 0 0.00 0 i'.00. 0.00 SL 0 0 15 0.00 0 0.00 18,4' 0.00 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.05 t 0 0.05 i 0 0.04 t 0.00 t SR 0 0 74 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 0 { 000 0 0.00 0.00 ET 3,200 3,200 1161 004 t 0 0.36 t 365 0.48 x 0.00 1 ER 1,600 1,600 370 0.23 0 0.23 0 0.23 0.00 NL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.,00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t ' BT 3,200 3,200 1037 0.32 0 0.32 3�60 0.44 0.00 AR 1,600 1,600 250 0.16 0 0.1L 451 0.44 0.00 ICU= 0.41 0.41 0.57 0.00 LDS= A A A A Notes: a) Asterisk (tj,indicates critical movement. b) LOS =Level,`➢f Service. -) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity lased an 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 287.001 Calt. mate: 01122/70 i INr,ERSECT10N CAPACITY =UTIL'ITA I0N A N A L Y S 1 5 City of: Rancho Cucamonga N/S treet: 1 15 NB Reaps E/G Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing +Alternative D Ad Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Kodification: None (Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUKULATIVE Peak V/C V/C - Existing Proposed Hour V/C Hour Vic Ncur Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio. Volume Ratio Volume a/Exist Lanes N/Prco Lanes - NIL 0 0 ,:8 0.00 3 0.00 0 0.00 0,00 'IT -,,zoo 3,200 0 0.25 x 0< 0.25 I 0 0.32 4 11.00 L NR 0 0 L40 0.00 0 0.00 231 0.00_ ^.an 31. 0 0 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0 Oa10 f 0.00 ! ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0' 0.00.E -MO SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.0 p 0.00 6400 EL 1,600 1,600 110 0.07 3, 0 0.07€ 0 0.07 t 0.0 ! ET 3,200 3,200 448 _O.i4 0 0.14 281 0.25 0.00 ER 0 r, 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 aL 0 0 0 0.00' 0 0,00 0 0.00 0.00 MINES MT 3,200 3,200 1392 0.43 t` 0 0,43 t 232 0.50 t MO I AR 1,600 1,600 10 0.05 0 0.05 52 0.05 0.00 ICU= 0.75 0.76 0.89 0.00 LOS= C C D A Notes aj AsterisY ('t) indicates critical movement. b) LDS'='_eve! Of Service, c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA CERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Nuaber 289.001 Cale. Date: 01122/90 dJ INTERSECTION CAPACITY UT ILIIA11511 ANALYSIS City of,:Rancho Cucamonga ;U5 Street: 115 NB Ramps E1W Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing,+Alternative D PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Hodificatioc:None (Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak t CUMULATIVE Peak Vic V/C Ex%sting Proposed Hour Vic Hour Vic Hour Ratio Ratio naeecent Capacity Capacity VC-ille Ratio Volume Ratio Volume wLExist Lanes wlProp Lanes NL 0 0 468 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 VT 3.200 3,200 0 0,35 1 0 0.35 t 0 0.so t 0.00''1 NR 0 0 662 0.00 0 0.00 457 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0.00 t A 0.00 t 0 0.00'1 0.00 1 $T 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 4<00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 413 0.26 1 0 0.26 1 0 0.26 1 0.00 t ET 3,200 3,200 864 0.27 0 0.27 548 0.44 0.00 ER 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 f, 0.00 0.00 WL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 OAO 0.00 WT 3,200 3,200 872 0.27 t 0 0.27 1 811 0.53 1 0.00 t M 1,600 1,600 73 0.05 0 0.05 ISO 0.16 0.00 Mu= 0.80 Ma 1.28 0.00, LDS= D 1) F A Notes a) Asteri•k (1) indicates critical movement. b) LOS= Level Of Service. c)Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH1Lane AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc. Date: 01122/90 I I N T E R S E C T 1 0 N CAF` ,CIIY UTIL.IIAT10N ANALYS-I5 City nf; Rancho Ceeaconga N,19 Street;.Etiwanda Ave Uw Stf to Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions.Existing t Alternative D AN Peak Hoar Volumes "apased Modification; None (Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak t CUMULATIVE Peak Vic Vic Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour V1C Hour 8adio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratia Volume it/Exist Ernes wlProp Lanes NL 0 0 88 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 110 0.00 0.00 4T 1,600 1161V 93 J.14 0 0.14 16 0.23 t 0.00 t NR 0 0 48 0.00 0 0.00' 13 040 0.00 SL 0 0 24 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 t 040 t ST 1,600 1,600 122 0.15 1 0 0.15 t 27 0.21 C.UO SR 0 0 69 0.00 0 0.40 67 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 69 0.05 1 0 ,.�05 t 36 0.07 t --0:00 t ET 3,200 3,200- 650 0.23 0 0123 39 0.30 0.00 ER 0 0 96 0.00 0 0.00 160 040 0.00 RL 1,600 1,600 58 0.05 0 0.05 9 0.05 0.00 WT 3,200 3,200 1148 0.37 t 0 0.37 t 85 0.34 t 0.00 t J NR 0 0 28 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ICU-- 0.57 0.57 0.69 0.00 LGS= A A 9 A a) Asterisk it?indicates critical movement. 1,1 LOS=Level Of Service. c)Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES,INC. d3 Capacity based on 1600 VPHfLane I' t• f_ y AFA Project Number 259.001 Calt.Date: 01122190 J rJ INTERSE,`7I0N CAPACIIY UTII, II'ATI0N ANALYSIS' City of: Rancho]=Alonga N/S Street: Etiwanda Ave P4 Street: Foo.hill Blvd Volume Conditions: Existing+Alternative'0 PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Hodificttion: None(Existing Conditions) Existing Cumulat EXISTING Project, TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C- Vic Existing Proposed Hour V/C Hour Vic Hour Ratiu Ratio Movement Capacity 6apacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio VoB.me wiExist Lanes M/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 136 0.00 0 0.00 383 0.00 0.00 - ?IT 1,600 1,600 155 0.26 t' 0 0.26 t 64 0.57 2 0.00 t 59 0 0 125 0.00 0 0.00 45 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 34 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 It 0.00 1 5T 1,600 1.600 79 0.10 0 0.10 52 0.21 0.00 SR 0 0 41 0.00 0 0.00 131 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 76 0.05 0 0.05 116 0.12 0.00 ET 3,200 3,200 1223 0.41 t 0 0.41 t 135 0.53`1 0.00 t ER 0 0 76 0.00 0 0.00 273 0.00 0.00 8L 1,600 1,600 43 0.03 I. 0 0.05 1 45 0.06 t 0.00 t WT 3,200 3,200 651 0.22 0 0.22 130 0.26 0.00 WR 0 0 53 0.00 0 0.00 0 040 0.00 ICU= 0.72 0.72 1.16 0100 t/ LOS= C C f A Motes a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane l`t AFA Project Number 289.00x_- Calc. Date: 01/22/90 I N I E R S 5 C i T 0 N CAPACITY 0TILIIATION A_NALY51S City of: Rancho Cucamonga HIS Street: Etiwanda Avp,, EtR Street:Arrow Hii, Volume Conditions: Existing i Alte nativp D AN Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification,None (Exist:dg Conditions) Existing Cuoulat EXISTING Proiact TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic We Existing Proposed Hour S1C Rout VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio V41lume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes: wtProp Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 114 0.07 t 0 0.07 I 9 0.08 1 �0.00 t ?li "Leo "Leo i44 0.12 0 0.11 '3B 0.13 0.00 NR 0 0 27 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 ',Leo 16 0.05 0 0.05 22- 0..05 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 222 0.18 1 0- - 0.16 t 22 0.29 t ).00 t SR 0 0 71 0.00 0 0.00 147 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 33 0.05 1 0 0.05 1 90 0.081t 0.00 1 ET 1,L00 1,600 98 0.06 0 0.06 4 0.06 0.00 'cl ER I'm 1,600 91 0.06 0 0.06 4 0.06 0.00 WL 1,600 1,600 102 0.06 0 0.06 0 0.06 0.00 WT 1,600 1,600 1161 0.16 1 0 Q.16 1 27 0.18 t 040 t WR 1,600 1,600 34 0.05 0 0.05 19 0.05 0.00 ICI= 0.46 0.46 0.63 0.00 LOS= A A D A Rotes a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes sources TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC, d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH1Lane AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc. Date: 01122/90 Fa - IITERSEC7ION `CAPAC'ITY. UT11LI2_ATI01 ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: Etiwanda Ave E/N Street:Arrow Hwy AM Volume Conditions: Existing+Alternative D PM reak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: None{Existing Conditions} Existing Cumulat EXISTING Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak EXISTING Peak +CUHULATIVE 'Peak Vic Vic Existing Proposed "cur ,I/C Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Vo;uce R 'ia Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Laves w/Prop Lanes NL 1,600 1 600 60 0.05 v 0.05 ^'4 0.05 v.00 IT 1,111 1,111 114 0.23 1 0 0:23 1 87 0.28 t- 1,11 t NR 0 0 71 0.00 0 0.00 0 o-1. 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 27 0..05 t 0 0.05 1 61 0.t6-9 0.00 1 iT 1,600 1,600 107 6.08 0 0.08 80 0.29 0.00 59 0 0 20 0.00 0 0.00 235 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 112 0.07 0 0.07 " 337 0.28 t 0.00 1 ET 1,600 1,600 355 0.22 t 0 0.22 t 29 0.24 0.0(! ER 1,600 1,600 126 0.08 0 0.08 10 0.09 0.00y` NL 1,600 1,600 3B 0.05 1 0 0.05 t 0 0.05 O.UO NY 1,600 1,600 115 0.07 0 0.07 10 %1.08 t 0.00 1 RR i,b00 1,600 41 0.05 0 0.65 81 0.08 0.00, ICU= ^.55 0.55 0.70 0.00 LOS= A A B A Notes: a) Asterisk it} indicates zritical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. 0 Sase traffic volumes Source: TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 287.001 Cale. Date: 01/22/90 ii INIER'5ECiI0N CAPACITY UTILIIA3I011 AHALYSI'S' City of: Rancho Cuc.;Tonoa NIS Street: 1-15 SB Ramps' E!%Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative A AM Peak Hour Voiases Proposed Modification:None (Existing Conditions) I Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL ZTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUKULATIVE Peak V:C V/u„ Existing Proposed Hour V/C Hour Vic Hour Ratio Ratid,` �'nveoent Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist"Lanes w/Prep Lines NL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 3 0 0.00 t 0.00 1 `1T 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 9R 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 D.rS 0e10 3L 0 0 9 0.00 0 0.00 112 0.00 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.53 S 0 0.53 t 0 0.56 t 0.00 t SP. 0 0 1673 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0, 0.0 t 0.00 t ET 4,600 4,800 351 0.07 0 0.07 223 C.12 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 546 0.34 0 0.34 i.34 0.00 ML 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 U. 11 0.0 1 k'T 4,800 4,800 1135 0.24E 0 0.24 4 148 u:�,.'1 0.00 t AR 1,600 1,600- 189 0.12 0 0.12 185 0.23 0.0A ICU= '` 0.77 0.77 0.83 0.00 LOS= C C D A # Notes: a) Asterisk (2) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level G(Se vice. c) Base;traffic voin =s source:. AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based an 160 u?:I/LaEe AFA Prdect Number 289.00. Calc. Dabi- 61/22/70 y r FA INTERSECTION CAPACITY UIiLIZATI0N ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga, HIS Street: 1-15 SS Ramps EIN S+ceet; foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background +Alternative A PM Peak Hour PreposeL Modification: Na,e (Existing Conditions) Background CumuIat BACKBROUNO, Prolect TOTAL TOTAL Paak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC t�' Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratii,� 'Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume <w/Exist Lanes w/Prop-Lanes NL 0 0 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 ! - O.Uv NT 0 0 0 0 r 0 0.00 0 0.00, 0.00 NR "v 0 0 p:. 0 0.00 0 0.00 3.00 SL 0 0 17 0 0.00 192 0.00 : 0.00 T 3,200 3,200 0 `0.16 t' r 0 0.16 1 0 0.22 1 6.00 t SR 0 0 505 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 OX t 0.09 t ET 4,800 4,800 1508 0.31 1 0 0.31 d 384 0.19 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 1444 0.90 0 0.90 0 0.90 0.00 NL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 J 0.00 0.00 AT 4,800 4,800 816 0.17 0 OX 369 0.25 0.00 NR 1,600 1,600 192 0.12 0 0.12 461 0.41 1 0.00 4 ICU= 0.47 0,47 0.63 0.00 1OS= A A r A a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c)Base traffic•tolumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity 'lased on 1600 VPH/Lane 1 AFA Project Number 289.001 Ca1c.Oaten 0112219C AM INTERSECTION CAPACITY UT IL1.1ATI04 ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street: 1-15 NB Ramps E/W Street: Foothill Llvd Volume Conditions: Background +Alternative A AM Peak Hour Proposed KLdiiit?tlon None (Existing Conditions) Backaround Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak, 11/C VIC Gxisting Proposed Hour V1C Hour V/C Hour Ratio Katia Movemeat Capacity Capacity 14DIuce Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes 'w/Prop Lanes IL 0 0 797 0.00 d.OU 0 ,141` 0.00 9T 3,200 3,200 t 0.'s3 t 0 0.33:1 a 0.41 4 0.00 t HR 0 0 244 0.00 0 0.00 ` 279 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0100 t 0 <0:00 E 0 0.00-t 0.00 R ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 1 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t U 0.00$ 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,800 117 0.05 0 0.05 535 0.01 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 248 0.16 0 0.16 0.16 0.00 WL 0 0 0 0.00 4 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 WT 4,800 4,800' 527 0.11 $ 0 0 11 $ 333 mb t 0.00 t WR 1,600 1,600 32 0.05 0 0.05' 74 0.07 0.00 ICU= 0.44 0.44 0.59 0.00 LOS= A q A A a Notes: a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical Movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c)Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Pmject dumber 289.001 Calc. Date: 01/22/90 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATI9N ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga N/5 Street: 1-15 NB Ramps E/W Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative A PM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None (Existinc Conditions) Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C Vic Existing Proposed Hour WC " Now V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes x1Prop Lanes NL 0 0 607 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00, 0.00 Ni 3,200 3,200 0 0.31 t 0 0.31,t 0 0.46-t 0.00 1 NR 0 0 387 0.00 - 0 0.00 460 0.00 0.00 v SL 0 0 0 0.40 1 0 0.00 4 0 0.00 t' 0.00 t ST 0 0 0 6.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 5R 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0..00 0.00 1 EL 0 10 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 2 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,800 276 0.06 0 0.06 576 0.18 0.00 ER 1,60t 1,600 1323 0.83 0 OX 0' 0.85 0.00 NL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 NT 4,850 4,800 421 0.09 t 0 0.09 1 830 0.26 t 0.00 t NR 1,600 1,600 119 0.07 0 0.07 184 0.19 0.00 ICU 0,40 0.40 0.72 0.00 LOS= A ii C A I Notes: i a) Asterisk It) indica_es critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volupp 'ource: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on'-AI YPH/Lane j� AFA Project Number 289.00i• Cali; Date: 01/22/90 f IJ INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION. ANAL.'iS13 City of: Rancho Cucasonga N/S Street: Etiaanda Ave E/a Street: Foothill Blvd Volume a Conditions. Background Alternative A AN Peak Hour n roposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) m kwound Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic VIC Existing Proposed Hour V/C `?our VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity `Volume Ratio Volume Ratio . Volume WExist Lanes n/Prop Lanes 211 NL 1,800 1,600 110 0.(7 t 0 0.07 t 0 0.07 t. 0.00 1 1T 3,200 3,200 259 0.l9 0 0.09 2S 0.11 0.00 NP. 0 0 22 0.00 0 0.00 27 6.00 0.00 31. 1,600 1,600 229 0:14 0 0.14 0 0.14 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 839 0.27 t 0 0.27 t 36 0.31 1 0.00 4- SR 0 0 33 0.00 0 0.00 73 0.00 040 ( EL 1,600 1,600 51 0.05 1 0 0.054 46 0.06 t 0.00 I li ET 3,200 3,200 196 0.09 0 0.09 47 0.10 1 0.00 t ER 0 0 B2 0.00 0 0.00 5 0.00 0.00 NL 1,600 1,600 140 0.09 0 �,�0;09 37 0.11 t 0A0 t WT 41800 4,000 421 0.14 9 0 0.14 1 75 0.15 t 0.00 1 XR 0 0 227 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.53 j''0.53 0.59 0.00 LOS= A A A A (i l ® Notes: a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. ) b) LOS=Level Of Service. ) Base traffic volu,.�es source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, JtNC, al Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc. Date: 01/22190 l f INTERSECTION CAPACIT UT ILIZATI.ON ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street: Etiwanda Ave E/N Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background +Aiternative A PM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None'(Existing Conditions) Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL' TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C I V/C. Existing Proposed Hour Vic Hour Y/C Hoer Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio -Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes wlProp Lanes N4. 1,600 1,600 208 0.13 0 0.13 P 0.13 0.00 VT 3"00 3 200 b37 0.25 t 0 0.25 3 b7~' 0.29't 0.00 t NR 0 '0 - 148 C,00 0 0.00 68 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 514 0.32 t 0 0.32 t 0. 0.32 t 0.00 t ST 3,200 3,200 331 0.11 0 0.11 65 0.17 0.00 SR 0 0 33 0.00 0 0.00 127 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 114 0.07 0 0.07 117 0.14 t 0.00 t ET 3,200 3,200 468 0.17 t 0 0.17 t 116 0.21 t 0.00 t -I ER 0 0 b8 0.00 0 0.00 12 0.00 0.08 NL 1,600 1,600 18 0:05 t 0 0.05 t 64 0.05 1 0.00 t 9T 4,800 4,800 268 0.09 0 0.09 128 0.11 t 0.00 t HR 0 0 151 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 � ICU= 0.74 0. 4 0.87 0.00 LOS= C ,C D A Notes: a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. r) Base traffic volumes source, AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based r,n 1600 VPH/Lane 1 AFA Project Number 289.001 Laic. Date: 01/22/90 INIERSECTIO-N CAPACITY U I I L I I A T 1 0 N ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga tUS Street: Etiwanda Ave i1N Street: Arrow Nay Volume Conditions:Background+Alternative A AM Peak Hour Propose.11lodification:None (Existing Conditions) Background Cutulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Pear BACKGROUND Peak +CURULATIVE Peak" Vic Vic Existing Proposed Hour Vic ;lour Vic Hour, Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 463 0.29 t 0 0.27 t 38 0J.' t 0.00 t NT 3,200 3,200 141 0.07 0 0.07 iB 0.07 0.00 NR 0 0 80 0.00 0 0.00- 0 0.00 MO SL 4,600 1,600 292 0.18 0 0.18 14 0.19 .0.00 Si 3,200 3,200 497 0.15 0 6.15 15 0.16 0.00 5R 1,600 1,600 361 0.23 1 0 6.23 i 0 0.23 t 0.00 t EL 1,600 1,600 16 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 5 0.05 1 0.00 I ET 3,200 3,200 247 0.10 0 0.10 23 0.11 0.00 ER 0 0 61 0.00 0 0.00' 22 0.00 0.00 4L 1,600 1,600 170 0.11 0 0.11 0 0.11 0.00 < aT 3,200 3,200 921 0.35 2 0 0.35 t 36 0.37 t 0.00 t NR 0 0 Ise 0.00 0 0.00 19 0.00 0.00, ICU= 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.00 LDS' D D E A Notes: a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. 6) LOS=Lever Of Cervice. f c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based an 160D VPH/Lane APA Project Nuober 289.001 Calc. Date: 01/2,2190 INTERSECTION CAPACIIY U'IIL11AT10N AktAL'YSIS City of: Rzncho Cucamonga NIS Street: Ehionda Ave E/Y Street; Arroy,Hay Volute Conditions. Background=Alternative A PH Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background i:uoulat BAC96ROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V/C Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio .,fib Movement Capacity Capacity Volume i, Ratio Volume Ratio Volume N/Exist Lanes w/Prop Win HL 1,600 1,600 113 ' 0.07 0 0.07 65 0.11 0.00 IT 3,200 3,110 480 0.21 t 0 0.21 t 31 0.22 t 0.00 d NR 0 192 D.00 0 0.00 4 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 -97 0.06 t 0 0.06 t 37 0.08 1- 0.00 2 ST 3,200 3,200 238 0.07 0 0.07 36 0.09 Oleo SR 1,600 1,600 31 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.05 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 271 0.17 0 0.17 12 0.18 !).00 ET 3,200 3,200 868 0.38 t 0 0.38 t 55 0.42 F 0.00 t ER 0 0 354 0.00 0 0.00 56 0:00 0.00 NL 1,600 1,600 74 0.05 t 0 0405 1 0 0.05 1 0.00 t MT 3,200 3,200 169 0.14 _ _..It 0.14 64 0.17 0.00 kR 0 0 279 0.00 0 0.00 32 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.70 0.70 -,0.77 0.00 LDS= B B C A Notes: a a) Asterisk it) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c)-Base traffic volut',s source: AUSTIN40UST ASSOC, INC. ' d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane APA Project Number 289.001 Calc. Date: 01/22/90 ; 'o INTERSECTION CAPA£IIY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucaaonaa NIS Streets I-15 SB Raaps E/N Street: Foothill Blvd Vatu'e Conditions: Background+Alternative B AM Peak Hour Vz!=mzn Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cuaulat BACKGROUND Pro7eit TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC Existing Froposrl Hour VIC Hour VIC Hour ) Ratio Ratio Movetent Capacity Capacit/ Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Valu'je'�4/Exist.Lanes k/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 1, '�o 0.00'1 0.00 1 A iT 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 )b;-` F).00 0.00 NR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 r:00 EL 0 0 9 0.00 0 0.00 121 0.00 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.53 1 0 0.53 t 0 0.56 t 0.00 t SR 0 0 1673 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 tr.00 EL 0 0 0„ 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,800 351 0.07 0 0.07 241 0.12 0.00 ER 1,600 1.600 546 0.34 0 0.34 0 0.34 0.00 WL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 19.00 0.00 4 MT 4,800 4,800 1135 0.24 1 0 0.24 1 167 0.27 1 0.00 1 ., WR 1,600 1,600 iB9 0.12 0 0.12 209 0.25 0.00 ICU= 0.77 0.77 0.83 LOS= C C D A Notes: a)Asterisk (L) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. 0 Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane t AFA Project Number 289.001 Caic. Date: 01122/90 it It J INTER5EGTIaN CAPACITY 911LIZ"A.TI0N ANALYSIS City o4:Rancha Cucamonga "US Street: I-15 SO Ramps E/a Street: foothill,Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative B PH Peak Hour Proposed Nadification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cusulak BACKB.000ND "Project TOTAL TOTAL' Peak -;BACKGROUND Peak +CUNUL'ATIVE Peak WC, Vic Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour V/1; Hour Ratio Ratio avetent Capacity Capacity Volute Ratio Volute ?,, Retie Volume it/Exist Lanes n/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 0 O:w. - 0 0.00 i 0 ",0.00 t 0.00 t 'IT 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 NR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 , SL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 195 `ti,.0.00 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.16 t 0 0.16 t 0 4.22 t 0.00 t SR 0 0 505 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 _L 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 t 0.00 t: ET 4,800 4,000 1508 0.31 t 0 0.31 t 389 0.40 0.00, ER 1,600 1,600 1444 0 90 0 0.90 0' 0:70 ^90 NL 0 0 0 0.00 i 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 0.00 Alum kT 4,000 4,800 836 0.17 0 0.17 377 0.25 4.00 M 1,600 1,600 !42 0.12 0 -0.12 471 0.41 t 0.00 t ICU 0.47 0.47 0.63 0.00 LOS= A A 8 A Notes: a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement: b) LOS=Level Of Service. -) Base traffic valoaes source: AUSTIN-f0U5T AS, °, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane \1 APA Project Nuaber 287.001 Calc. Date: 01122/90 ' 14TERSECI10N CAPACITY U T I L I Z A I 1 0 N ANALY S �,. City of;Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street: 1-15 f!B Ramps E/lI Street. Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative B.AN Peak Hour fProposed Modification: None (Existing Cond,::ons) Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACK6ROUND Peak -CUMULATIVE Peak Vic V/C Existing Proposed Hour V/C Hour Vic Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Voluaa Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes m/Prip Lanes NL 0 0 797 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 IT 3,211 3,111 0 0.33 1 0 Oa'v3 t 0 1,11 1 0.00 1 NR 0 0 244 0.00 0 0.00 301 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0.00 t ` ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1.00 SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0,00,t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,800 112 0.05 0 0.05 362 0.10 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 248 0.16 0 0.16 0 0.16 0.00 NL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ' ifta NT 4,800 4,B00 527 0.11 t 0 0.11.t 376 0.19 1 0.00 t VR 1,600 1,600 32 0.05 0 0. 83 0.07 0.00 ICU= 0.44 -0.44 0.61 0.00 LOS= A A A Notes: al "'terisk it) indicates critical oovement. b1 LOS=Level Of Service. 'cl Base traffic.voluses source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 9PH/Lane AFA Project Nusber 289.001 Calc.Date: Oi122/90 \1 i C I 1 0 H CAPACITY U I I L I I A 7 1 8 N ANALYSIS City of; RanC6 Cu_aoonga NIS Street: 17$; NB Ramps E/N Street: Foothill Blvd Volute Conditions; Backgrounl+Alternative B PM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cumulat .BACKGROUND Project 'TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak' +CUWLATIVE Peak VIC vie Existing Proposed Hour Vic Hour We Hour Ratio RatioX Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume alExist Lanes a/Prop S�`�nes NL 0 0 607 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 `7T 3,200 `: 3,200 0 0.31 t. 0 0.31 t 0 0.46 t 011r- NR 0 0 387 0.00 0 0.00 486 0.00 0�'0 SL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0.00 t "✓ ST 0 0 0 0.00 Q* 0.00 0 0;00 040 SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 OJD0_- :,0.00 EL 3 0 0 0.00 4 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,000 276 0.06 0 0.06 584 0.1k 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 1323 0.83 0 0.83 0 0.63 0.00 kL 0 0 0 `` 0.00 0 0.04 0 0.00 0.00 8T 4,800 4,800 421 1.09 t 0 0.09 t 94B 0.26 t 0.00 1 iiR 1,600 1,600 119 6.07 0 0.07 18B 0.19 0.00 ICU= 0.40 0.40 0.12 0 00 LOS= A A C A Notes: a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c)Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 Off/Lane AFA Project'cumber 289.001 Caic. Date: 01/22190 tj INTERSEGTI0N CAPACITY UT IL1ZAT15N ANAL PSIS City of.Rancho Cuca'anga HIS Street: Etivanda Ave GIN Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative B AN Peak Hour Froposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background. Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL'S TOTAL'- � Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour SIC Hour Ratio Ratio Hovement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume alExist lanes 0/Pr6p Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 110 0.07 t 0 0.07 t 0 0.07 1 0.00 1 IT 3,200 3,200 119 1,11 0 1,19 30 0,11 0.00 NR O 0 22 040 0 0.00 30 0,10 - 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 229 O.i4 0, 0.14 0 0.14 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 839 0.27 1 w 0.27 1 40 0.31 t 0.00 1 SR 4 0 33 0.00 0 0.00 81 0.00 0.00 �. EL 1,600 1,600 51 010,51 0 0.05 t 34 0.07 t 0.00 1 ET ,200 3,200 196 0.07, 0 0.09 53 0.11 t 0.00 t ER 0 0 82 0.00 0 0.00 5 0.00 0.00 I! uL 1,600 1,600 140 0.09 0 0.09 41 0.11 1 0.00 t' dT 4,800 4,800 421 0.14 1 0 0.14 t BO 0.15 t 0.00 t NR 0 0 227 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ICu= 0.53 0.53 0.60 0.00 LOS= A A A A_ Notes a) Asterisk It)indicates critical movement. Q h) LOS=Level Of Service. ^) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based cn 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 289.001 Caic. Date: OV22190 INTERSECTION CAPACITY '3TILIZAI10N ANALYSIS City of. Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: Etiaanda Ave E/N Street: Foothill Blv` Volute Conditions: Background t Alternative E PM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cusulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL , Peak BALKGROUND Peak t CUMULATIVE Peak Vic VIC t /C Hour Ratio Ratio xisting Proposed Hour VIC Hour 1 Movement Capaciiv Capacity Volume Ratio Volute Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop'Lanes NL 1.00 1,600 208 0.13 0 0.13 0 0.13 0.00 9T 3,200 3,200 637 0.25 t _: 0 "0.25 1 10 0.29 t 0.00 E` ' ;!R 0 0 148 0xOO 0 0.00 69 0.00 0.00 SL 1�60C 1,600 514 0:32 t 0 0,32E 0 0.32 t 0.04 t ST 3,200 3,200 331 0.11 0 0.11 64 0.17 O.00 SR 0 0 33 0.00 0 000 130 0.00 0.00 EL 1,500 2,600 114 4,07 0 0.07 119 0.15 t 0.00 t ET 3,200 3,200 468 0.17 t 0 0.17 t 119 0.71 1 0.00 t En 0 0 68 0100 0 0.00 15 0.00 0,03 NL 1,600 1,600 is 0.05 t 0 0.05 1 E4 0.05 t 0.00 t WT 4,800 4,000 258 0.01 0 0.09 130 0.11 t 0.00 I !iR 0 0 151 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ., ICU= 0;79 0.79 0.87 0.00 LOS= C G O A e Hotea a) Asterisk:Lt) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes Source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lne AFA Prpject Number 289.001 talc,Tate: 01122190 f r INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS city of. Rancho Cucamonga NIS Eireet: Etiaanda Ave E!N Street: Arran Hwy R t4 Volume Conditions.Background t Alternative B AN Peak Hour P-^posed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background 1) Cumulat 5ACKS,1,9UHD Project TOTAL TOTAL +` Peak BACKBROUNu: - Peak £CUMULATIVE Peak Vic Vic Existing Proposed Hour V/C Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio `g Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio;, Volume Ratio Volume' w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 1,600' 1,600 46'( 0.29 1 0 0.29 1 36 0.31 1 0.00 1 'iT 3,200 3,200 141 0.07 0 007 24 0.08 .0100 NR 0 0 80 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 292 0:18- 0 0.18 20 0.20 0.00 ST -,200 3,200 487 0.15 0 0.15 19 0.16 0.00 SR 1,600 1,600 361 0.23 1 0' 0.23 1' 0 0.23 1 0.00 1 EL 1,600 1,600 16 0.05 1 0 0.05 1 5 0.05 1 0.00 1 ET 3,200 3,200 247 0.10% 0 0.10 -22 0.11 0.00 ER 0 0 61 0.00 0 0.00 ` 23' a.00 0.00 'DL 1,600 1,600 170 0.11 0 0.11 0 0.11 0.00 NT 3,200 3.200 927 0.35 1 0 0.35 1 36 0.37 1 0.00 1 WR 0 0 ISO 0.00 0 0.00 24 0.00 0.00 ® ICU= 0.87 0.87 0.71 0.00 LOS= D D E A Notes: a) Asterisk (1)indicates critical movement. ' b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FDUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 YPHlLane ,J ,r- APA Projet`Number 289.001 Caic. Date: 01/22/90 �~�t� C 4,- ,1 INTERSECTION "EA TY UTILIZAT10N� ANALY51S City of: Rancho;Cucaeongz NIS Street: Etiwanda Ave Eib Street: Arrow Hwy Volume Conditions:Ba,.xgrqund+Aitercative B PM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: Non* (Existing Conditions) Oackaround Cumulat BACKGROUND Projeci TOTAL TOTAL, Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak VIC VIC Existing Proposed Hour VIC Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL I'm 1,600 113 0.07 J 0.07 58 0.11 0.00 " NT 3,200 3,200 400 0.21 t 0 0.21 1 39 0.22 1 1 O.00 i NR 0 0 .'92 0.00 0 0.r-, 0 0.00 0.00 3L 1,600 1,600 97 0.06 t 0 0.06# 45 0.09 t 0.00 t ST 3,200 3,200 238 0,�7 0 +1,07 45 0.07 0.00 SR 1,600 1,600 31 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.05 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 271 0.17 0 0.17 15 0J8 O.OD ET 3,200 a,200 868 Me,t 0, 0.38 t 49 0.41 t 0.00 t ER 0 0 354 0.00 0 0.00 49 0.00 0.00 kL 1,600 1,600 74 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 0.00 t NT 3,200 3,200 169 0.14 0 0.14 58 0.17 0.00 I RC 0 0 279 0.00 0 0.00 �f 39 0100 0.00 is 1 ICU= 0.70 0 70 ��" 0.77 0.06 c A Notes., a] Asterisk (t) indicates critical aovement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c)Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC d1 =apacity based on 1600 UPHILane f APA Project Humber 289.001 Calt. Date: 01122/90 f INTERSECT10IN CAPACITY UT ILIZATID'N AN ALYSI,9 City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: 1-15 SB Ramos E/H Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative C AM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: Hone (Existing Conditions) Background Cumalat BACHR1 49 Project TOTAL TOTAL' Peak BACKER UND Peak +CUMULATIVE 'Peak Vic Vic , Existing Prmpased Hour VIC Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Values Ratio Volume a/Exist Lanes ulProp Lanes 4L 0 v 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 1 _ ,N 0 0 0 0.00' 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 7R 0 0 0 0.00 0 mo 0 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 9 MO 0 0.00 93 040 - 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.53 t 0 0.53 t 0 4.55 t 0.00 1 ER 0 C i673 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t E7 4,800 4,200 351 0.07 0 0.07 127 0.11 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 546 034 4 0.34 0 0,34 0.00 HL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ST 4 .y ¢�EOt. 1135 0.24 t 0 0.24 t 104 0.26 t 0.00 3 7R 4600 1,600 189 0.12 0 0.12 130 0.20 0.00 1CU= 0.77 0.77 0.81 0.00 LOS= C C D A f o Notes: a) Astarisk (t) indicates critical movement. " b) LOS=Level Of Service. 0 Base traffic voluaaB source: AUSTIN-FOUST AMC, INC. d) Capacity Lased an 1600 VPH/Lane f AFA Project Number 289.001 • Ca)c. Date: 01/22/90 Aff - r� E� 'fit) 1NTERSECTI0N. CAP4CITY UT IL1114710H ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street: I-15 SB Ramps E/W;Street: Fcothlll Blvd Volume Conditions: Backaround{Alternative C'PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: None ;Existing Conditions) u Background Cueulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C Vic Existing Proposed -Hour V/C Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio- 6oveaent Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume alExiet Canes alProp Lanes NL 0 0 0 0.00 1 0 0.";,t 0 0.00 t 0.00 L `1T 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 '0.00 0.00 NR 5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.00 0.00 SL u 0 17 0.00 ;i 0.00 180 0.00 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.16 t 0 0.16 1 0 0.22 t 0.00.t SR 0 0 505 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL` 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 t 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,800 1508 0.31 t 0 0.31 t 360 0.39 0.60 ER 1,600 1,600 1444 0.90 0 0.90 - 0 0.90 0.00 WL 0 0 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0 ' 0.00 0.00 WT 4,800 4,800 836 0.17 0 0.17 360 0.25 0.00 WR 1,600 1"600 192 0.12 0 0.12 450 0.40 t 0.00 E ICU= 0.47 0.47 0.62 0.00 LOS= A A B A :Notes: a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. h) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIH-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane t AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc, Date: 01/22/90 leiINTERSECTION CAPACIT - UT ILIZ,AT10H ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cucamonga 4/11 Street: 1-15 NB Ramps E/N Street: Footsill Blvd Volume Conditions. Background+Alternative CAN Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Nodification: None (Existing Conditions) Backaround Cusulat BACKMIID Project -,TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUGULATIVE Peak V/C V/C Existing Proposed Noun V/C Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement,Capacity Capacity Volute Ratio •,Volume Ratio Volume y/Exist Lanes u/Prop Lanes NL 0 0 797 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 NT 3,200 ;200 0 0.33 t a 0.33 t 0 0.40 1 0.00 4 NR 0 0 244 0.00 0 0.00 ' 234 O.OQ 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 -'0 0.00 4 0.00 ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 - 0.00 0.00 j EL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0 0 0'- 0.00 1 ET 4.B^A 4,800 112 w'A5 0 0.05 260 0.08 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 248 0.16 0 0.16 0 0.16 0.00 WL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 040 0.00 NT 4,800 4.BOO 527 0.11 t 0 0.11 t 234 0.16 4 0.00 t AR 1,600 1,600 32 0.05 0 0.05 52 041,05 0.00 ICU= 0.44 0.44 0.56 0.00 LOS= A A A A Notes: a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 VPN/Lane AFA Project Number 299.001 Calc.Date: 01/22/90 INTERSECTION CAPAC : TY '�UTILIZAT10N ANALYSIS I , City of: Rancho Cucamonga 1115 Street: I-15 INS Ramps_ EIN Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions:Background+Alternative C PM Peak Hour Volumes Propos-q Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Camulat G4CKSROUN➢ Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak + CUMULATIVE Peak V!C VIC Existing Proposed Hour Vic Hour Vic Hour" Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume, Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Proo Lanes NL 0 0 607 0.0;; 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 4T :.200 3,200 0 0.31 t 0 0.3I t 0 0.45 t 0.00 t NR 0 0 367 0.00 0 0.00 450 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 v;00 t 0.00 t 5T 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 6.00 0 0.00 0 "0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 -0 0.00 t 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,800 276 0.06 0 0.06 540 0.17 0.00 ER 1,600 1,600 1323 0.83 0 0.93 0 0.83 0.00 WL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 WT 4,800 4,800 421 0.09 t- 0 0.09 t 810 0.26 t 0100 t WR 1.600 11600 119 0.07 0 0.07 0o 0.11 0.00 ICU= 0.40 0.40 0.71 0.00 LOS= A A C A �. Notes a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. �® b)LOS=Level Of Service. \� c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FRU5L ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPHILane i AFA Project Number 289,001 Calc. Date: OYU/% 4 I H I E R S E C I 1 0 N CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALY5I5 City of: Rancho Cucar I;4ia N/S Street;Etiwanda Ave E/Y Street; Foothill Blv1 Volume Conditions: Backgrnund +R1:,_.native C AM Peak Hour Volunes Proposed Modification: None (Existing Canditions} Background Cuaulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL weak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE. Peak V/C V/C Iisting Proposed Hour VIC Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratit Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratia Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes x/Prop Lanes 13 NL 15600 1,600 110 0.07 t 0 0.07 t ill',', 0.14 t 0100 t IT 3,111 3,200 117 1,11 0 1,11 16 MO 0,00 NR 0 0 22 0.00 0 0.00 13 0.00 : O.OQ SL 1,600 1,600 229 0.14 0 0.14 0 0.14 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 839 0.27 t 0 0.27 t 27 0.30 I 0,00 t- SR 0 0 33 0.00 0 0.00 b6 Q.OQ 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 51 0.05 .1 0 0.05 1 36 0.05 0.00 , i, ET 3,200 3,200 196 0.09 0 0.07 39 0.15 t 0.00 4 92 i ER 0 0 82 0.00 0 0.00 160 0.00 010 AL 1.600 1,600 140 0.09 0 0.09 9 0.04 t 0.00 t HT 4•60d 4,G00 42L 0.14 t 0 0.14 i 84 0.15 0.00 aR 0 0 ,227 0.00 U 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.53 0.53 0.68 0.00 Los= A A B A i Notes- a) Ast-1 k (1) indicates critical movewnt. b) LOS:`revel Of Service. c) Base-traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FZ* T ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane d AFA Project NuM4er 287.001 Calc. Date: 01/221,90 0 I N T E R S E C I 1 0 H CAPACITY U.TILIIATIDN ANALY5IS City of- Rancho Cucamonga N/S Street; EtiNanda Ave EiN Street: Foothill BIvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative C PH Peak Hour Volumes t Proposed Oodifiration: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cuaulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C V/C Existing Proposed Npur V/C Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume M/E::istl.anes HIProp Lanes .17 ' NL 1,600 1,600 208 0.13 0 0.13 376 0,37 0.00 IT 3,111 3,211 637 1,21 1 0 1,21 t 64 1,21 1 =-^ ^ 1 NR 0 0 148 0.00 0 0.00 45 0.00 0.00 3L 1,600 1,600 514 0.32 t 0 0.32 t 0 0.32 t 0.00 t ST 3,200 3,200 331 0.11 0 0.11 SL' 0.17. 0.00 SR 0' 0 33 '0.00 0 0.00 128 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600- 114 0.07 0 0.07 116 0.14 0.00 ET 3,200 3,10e 46B 0.17 1 0 0.17 f 135 0.29 t 0.00 t ER 0 0 6B 0.00 0 0.00 272 0.00 0.0 AL`' 1,600 1,600 1B 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 45 0.05 t 0100 t kT 4,800 4,800 269 0.09 0 0.09 135 0.12 0.00 WR 0 0 151 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 �. ICU= 0.79 0.79 0.94 0.00 LOS= C' C E Notes: a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement. b) LOS=Leve) Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source:` AUSTIN-PDUST ASSOC. INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane r' ,1 APA Project.Number 2B9.001 Calc. Date., 01/22/90 I N T E R S E C T 1 9 P CAPACITY UTILI'ZAI10N A11ALYSIS City of. Rancho Cucr..dnga N/S Straet: Etir'_dda Ave EIN Street: Arrow Pwy Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative C AN Peak Hour Volumes i Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak , BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic Vic Existing Proposed Hour , V/C Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio ®, Movenent Capacity Capacity 4sluor Ratio Volume Ratio Volume m/Exist Lanes a/Prop Lanes HL 1,600 1,600 463 0.29 S 0 0.29 t 9 0.30 t 0.00 t J IT 3,200 3,200 191 0.01 0 0.07 36 1.18 0.00 NR 0 0 90 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 _ SL 1,600 1,600 212 01.18 0 0.18 21 0.20 0.00 ST 3,200 -.,Zoo 487 0.15 0 0.15 22 0.16 0.00 SR 1,600 1,600 361 0.23 t 0 0.23 t 148 0.32 t 0.00 t EL 1,600 C,400 16 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 90 0.07 t 0.00 t sl ET 3,200 3,200 247 0.10 0 0.10 4' 0.10 0.00 ER 0 0 61 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.00 0.00 kL 1,600 I'm 170 MI, 0 0.11 0 0.11 0.00 WT 3,20. 3,200 927 0.35 t 0 0.35 t 27 0.36 1 0.00 t ➢R 0 C 1BB 0.00 0 0.00 20 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.87 U.87 0.98 0.00 LOS= D D E A Notes: a)Asterisk M indicates critical movement. b) LDS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic voluses source: AUSTIN-FOUST MSOC, INC. d)Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project;Number 289.001 Calc.'Daie:, Ol/i2/90 I N T E R S E C T 1 0 N ^CAPACITY U T I L I I A T 1 0 N ANALY5IS q City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS Street: Etiwanda Ave E/Y Street: Arrow Hwy Volume Conditions: Background+Alterna4ve C PM Peak Haar Volumes; Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) �t• Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic Vic _ Existing Proposed Hour V/C Hour V/C Hour Ratio Ratio Moveoent Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volute Ratio Volume w/Exist Larc, w/Prop Lanes NL 1,600 1,' ,d 113 0,07 0 0.07 4 0.07 0.00 �r NT 3,200 ,200 480 0.21 1 0 0.21 1 86 0.34 1 0.00 3 NR 0 0 192 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 97 0.06 a 0 0.06 t "b.10 a 0.00 t BT 3,200 3,200 238 0.07 0 ,A'97 BO r;10 ,0.V0 SR _1,600 1,600 31 0.05 0 0.05 234 0.17 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 271 0.17 0 0.17 332 0.38 t 0.00 a 'ET 3,200 3,200 869 0.32 t 0 0.38 t 29 0.49 0.00 ER 0 0 354 0.00 0 0.00 10 0.00 0.00 NL 1,600 1,600 74 0.05 1 0 0.05 t 0 0.05 %1 3,200 3,200 169 0.14 0 0.14 10 0.17 1 OO a NR 0 0 279 0.00 0 0.00 BO 0.00 0.00 8d ICU= 0.70 0.70 0.89 0.00 tt LOS= B $ D A i � NoteF.; a) Asterisk 1a) indicates critical movement. ,' LOS=Level Of Service. cl Bass traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC.. d) Capatty based on 1606 VPH/Lane I AFA Project Number 289.001 Cale.Bate; 01/22190 i f � � c INTERSECTION C:iPAC"ITY UTIL :ATIOH ANALIY515 City `r: Rancho Cucamonga c, WS Street: 1-15 SB Ramps EIK Street.�rFoathilI Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative D AM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) k Background Lumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL Tr'YAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic Vic Existing Proposed Hour 7/C Hgue V1C Hour Ratio Ratio 1f movement Capacity C-:'acity Volume Ratio Volume;__ RatW Volume ii/Exist Lanes wiProp Lanes 0 1 0 0.0u 1 0 0.00 t 0 0100 1 0.00 t IT 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 UR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 8L 0 0 7 - 0.00 0 0.00 44 0.00 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.53 1 0 0.53 t 0 0.o6<t," :0p t SR 0 0 1673 0& 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 t 0.00 t ET 4,800 4,260 351 0.07 0 0.07 187 0.11 0.00 Ed 1,600 1,600 546 0.34 0 0.34 0 0.34 0.00 HL 10 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00. HT 4,R00 4,800 1135 0.24 t 0 0.24 1 103 0.26 t 0.00 t 4R 1,600 1,600 184 0.12 0 0.12 127 0.20 0.00 ICU= 0.77 0,77 0.82 0.00 LOS= C C D A Notes: a)Asterisk (t) indicates critical movement. S b) LOS=level Of Service. 0 Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC,INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH1Lane AFA Project Number 284.001 Ca1c. Date:: 01122/90 i INTER5ECTI0N CAPACITY " UTILIZATION ANALY51S City of: Rancho Cucamonga , NIS Street: I-15 SB Raps E/W Street:Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative B PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic V/C xisting Proposed Hour VI Hour VIC Hour Ratio Ratio Movement Capact Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes a/Prop Lanese NL 4 0 0 4.40# 0 4.04 1 4. 0,00 t 0;00 1 e !IT ? 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 INR 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 n. 17 0.00 0 0100 183 O.oO 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 0 0.16 t 0 0.16 1 0 0.22 1 0.0(a I SR 0 0 505 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 0 040 0 0.00 t 0.00 t Ei 4,800 4,800 150E 0.31 t 0 0.31.t 365 0.39 0.00 ER 1,604 1,600 1444 4.90 0 0.90 0 0.90 0.00 AL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 I 0 0.00 0.00 WT 4,800 4,800 SX 0.17 0 0.17 360 0.25 0.00 NR x iOD 1,600 192 0.12 0 0.12 451-; 0.40 t 0.00 t ICU= 0.47 0.47 3.62 0.00 LDS= M A B A 1 Notes: a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical movement., b)IDS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUST194GUST PS50C, INC. d) Capacity based an 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Prntiect Number 191401 Ca1c, Date: 01/22/90 INTER9ECTION CAPACITY UIILIZAT10N AHALY915' City of: Rancho Cucamonga tI/S Street; I-15 NB Rasps Elil Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative D AM Peak Hour Volumes ?i Proposed Modification: None(Existing Conditions) Background Cueulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak Vic V/C Existing Proposed Hour V/C Hour V/Ca Hour Ratio Ratio '..,ement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes HL' 0 0 797 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00: HT 1,100 1,101 0 0.11 2 0 0.11 1 0 1*11 t 0.00 1 NR 0 0 244 0.00 0 0.00 214 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 i Cr,tO 1 ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 11 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 t 0 0.00 1 0.00 1 ET 4,000 4,800 112 OAS 0 0.05 28i 0.08 0.00 ER 1,60D 1,600 248 0.16 0 0.16 0 0.1E 0.00 NL 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0ti ,, 0 0.00 =, 0.00 kT 4,800 4:600 527 0.11 t 0 0.11 1 232 0.16 t 0.00 1 WR 1.600 1,600 32 0.05 0 0.05 52 0.05 0.00 ICU 0.44 0.44 0.56 t}.00 LDS= A A A A 1 Notes: a) Asterisk 9) indicates critical movement. h) LOS=Level Of Service. c)Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 289.001 Cilc.Date: 01/22790�1 , E M IITERSECT10It C A P A C I I Y UTILIZAT1011 ANALYSIS City of, Rancho Cucamonga HIS Street: I-15 NB Ramps i(W Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background+Alternative D PM Peak HOUC Voluces, Proposed Modification: None (Existing Cmnditions) Background` Cunulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak !/C Vic t C Existing Prooqed Hour VIC Hour VIC Hcd. Patio Ratio Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume wlExist Lanes .VlProp Lanes " NL 0 0 607 0,.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 " HT 3,200 3,200 0 0.31 t 0 0.31 t - 0 0.45 t 0.00 t NR 0 0 Z87 0.00 0 0.08 457 0.00 0.00 SL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 Q.00 t 0 0.00 t 0.00 t [ ST 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 v.00 On SR 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 u 0.00 0.00 EL 0 0 0 0.00 t 0 O:aO t 0 ✓t 0.00 t €. ET 4,800 4,800 276 0.06 0 0.04 548 OX 0.00. e ER 1,6C0 1,600 1323 0.83 0 O.By 0 0.83 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 ALMR'T 4,900 4,800 421 0.07 d 0 0.09 I oil ",,26 t 0.00 t r W 1,600 1,600 119 0.07 0 0.07 180 0.19 0.00 ;® ICL= 0.40 0.40 0.71 0.00 f LOS= A A C A Notes: a) Asterisk (t) indicates critical amvepent. h) LOS=Level Of Service. _) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. 1600 V H/Lane d Capacity based on P P Y i [, Ar'A Project Number 26'.001 Calc. Date: 01/22/90" r 1NT ECT10N, CAPACITY. 0 1 1 L I I A I I U N AHALY5�15 City of: Rancho Cucamonga NIS`Street- Etiwanda Ave EIV Street: Foothill Blvd q Voluee Conditions: background t Alternative O AM Leak Hour VnlUces i Proposed Nodification;None (Existing Conditions) Back,round Canulat BACrGROUND Project TOTAL TOTAL - Aak BACKBRCUNO Peal t CUMULATIVE Peak' VIC VIC Existing °repnaed Hour Vic Hosr VIC Hour Ratio Batio Novecent Capacity Capacity VoIw Ratio volume Ratio Vo1Uee wlExist Lanes w/Prop Lanes N1 1,600 1,600 110 0.07't ^' v.07 t 110 0.14 t 0.00 t 4T 3,200 3,200 257 0.09 0 0.09 16 0.10 0.00 °R 0, 0 22 0.00 0 0.00 13 0,00 0.00 L 1,600 1,600 i?4' 0.14 0 0.14"= 0 0:14 0.00 5T' 3,200 1,200 839 0.27 t G 0.27 i 27 0.30 i 0.00 t SR 0 0 31t 0.00 0 0.00 67 4.00 0.00 EL i,F^n 1,600 51 0.03 t 0 0.05 t 36 0`05 0.00 ET 3,700 3,200 196 JM 0 0.09 39 0.15 t 0.00 1 ER 0 0 62 0.00 t. 0.00 160 0.00 0.00 I+ AL 1,600 1.600 140- 0.07 0 0.07 9 0.09 t 0.00 t AT 4,800 4,800 421 0.14 t 0 0.14 t 65 0.15 0-00 WR 0 0 227 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 I ICU= 0.53 0.53 G,68 0.00 LOS= A A B A Notes: a) Asterisk (t).indicates critic?:soveGat. b) LOS=Level M Service. e) Base traffic voluses source: AUE !i-"UST ASSOC, ?NC. d) "apacity based an 1600 VPHILane .nm Project Nuoder 289.001 talc.Dater G1122190 IN7ERSEC710N CAPA.CjTY UTILIZAi10N ANALYSIS City of: Rancho Cccamonga NIS Street.Etiwanda Ave E/N Street: Foothill Blvd Volume Conditions: Background i Alternative D,PM Peak Ifc��Volumes Proposed Mnlification: Noce (Existing Conditions) _ Background Cumul ; BACKGROUN➢ °roject a➢TAL TOTAL Existing Propnsz Peak BACKGROUND Peat` t CUMULATIVE Peak Vic 'i, VIC d Hour VIC Hour Vic flour Ratio Ratio Fovement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume a/Exist Lana>' /Pr"p Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 208 0.1a;, 0 A.13 383 0.37 10.00 !)T 3,200 3,200 637 0.25 t 0 0,25 t 64 �128 1'- 0.00 1 NR 0 0 148 0.00 0 0.00 95 1.00 0.00 SL 1.600 1,600 514 0.32 t 0 0.32 t 0 0.32 3 0.06 1 $T 3,200 3,200 331 011 0 0.11 52 0.17 0.00 SR 0 0 33 0.00 0 0.00 131 0.00 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 114 0.07 0 0.07 116 0,14 0.00 E1 3,200 3,200 468 0.17 i U 0.17 t 135 0.30 t 0.00 t - ER 0 0 68 0.00 0 0.00 27;, 0.00 0.00 WL I'm I'm 18 0.05 1 0 0.05 1, 45 0.05 i WT 4,800 4,B00 265 0.09 0 0.09 138 0.12 0-A0 AR 0 0 151 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 09. ;9l SCU= 0.79 0,79 0.95 0.00 LOS= C C A Notes: a) Asterisk Sol indicat¢5:: iral movement. b) LOS=Lrvel Of Service. ) Base trai it volumes sow',a-. AUSTIN-IFOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based tin 1600,VPH/Lane AFA Project Number 289,001 Calc.Date: 01122,190 ;I , INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS City of: 1=10 Cucamonga N/S Street: Etiwanda Ave Elk Street: Arrow Hwy Mr Volute Conditions: Background +Alternative D AM Peal Hour Volumes Proposed Hadification: None (Existing Conditions) Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TCTAL TOTAL Peak BACKGROUND Peak +l:UMULATIVE Peak Vic V/C Existing Proposed Hour V/C1 Hou! Vic flout ' Ratio Ratio Moveaent Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume w/Exist Lanes wlProp Lanes NL 1,600 1.600 -463 0.29 t 0 0.27 t 9 0.30 t 0.00 t NT 3,200 3r$200 idi 0.07 0 0.07 38 0.08 0.00 4R 0 0 BO 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 3L 1,600 1,600 292 0.18 11 0.18 22 0.20, 0.00 ST 3,200 3,200 487 0.15 0 0.15 22 0.16 0.00 SR 1,600 1,600 361 0.23 t 0 0.23 t 147- 0.32`1 0.00 1 EL 1,600 1,600 16 0.05 t 0 0.05 t 90 0.07 t 0.00 t, ET 3,200 3,200 247' 0.10 0 0.10 4 0.10 0.0.0 ER 0 0 61 0.00 0, 0.00 4 0.00 0.00 WL 1,600 1,600 170 0.11 0 0:11 0 0.11 .3.00 WT 3,200 3,200 927 0.35 t 0 0.35 t 27 0.36 t 0.00 t SR 0 0 188 0.00 0 0.00 19 0.00 0.00 ICU= 0.87 0.87 0.98 0.00 LOS= 0 D E A Notes: a) Asterisk (1) indicates critical Livesent. b) LOS=Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOC, INC. d) Capacity based on 1600 VPH/Lane nrA-Project Number. 289.001 Ca1c. Date: 01/22/90 l I N T E R 5 E C T 1 6 N CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ^ City of: Rancho Cucamonga NlB Street: Etiaanda Ave E/U Street: Arrow Nay Volume Conditions: Background +Alternative 0 PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Modification: !lone (Existing Conditions) Background Cumulat BACKGROUND Project TOTAL TOT, t Peak BACKGROUND Peak +CUMULATIVE Peak V/C VIC-' Existing Proposed Hour WC Hour V/C'. Hour, 'Ratio RatiC Movement Capacity Capacity Volume Ratio Volume Ratio VCium6'',1,Exist Lanes w/Prop Lanes NL 1,600 1,600 113 0.07 C 0.07 4 0.07 5 0.00 _ IT 3.200 .,200 460 0.21.f 0'_ 0.21 t e7 0.24 t 0.00 t NR 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 SL 1,600 1,600 J 0.06 t 0 0.06 t bl 0110 t 0.00,I ST 3,200 3,200 239 0.07 0 0.07 80 0.10 0.00 SR 1.600 1.600 31 0.05- 0 0.05 235 0.17 0.00 EL 1,600 1,600 271 0.17 0 0.17" 337 0.38 t 0.00 t ET 3,200 7,200 068 ' 0.30 0 0138 t 29 0.39 0.00 ER 0 0 354 0.00 0 0.00 \10 - ^00 0.00 WL 1,600 1,600 74 0.05 1 0 0.05 t 0 0.05 0.00 WT 3,200 3,200 169 0.14 0 0.14 10 0.17 t 0.00 t WR 0 0 279 0.00 0 0.00` 81 0.00 0.00 - ICU 0.70 0.70 _0.89 0.00 LO5= B B D A Notes: a Asterisk t Ie i ts critical movement. I ti L p D5=Level � Sert e T t Basu traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUS. ASSOC, NC. 1 : d) Capacity t?sed an 1600 VPH/Lane 1 7 AFA Project Number 289.001 Calc. Date 01/22/90 {< I ary TRAFFIC.ENGINEERING. AND rRANspoirAr/ON PLANNIN@ ®. 2020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE • SAWTA ANA,.CALIFORNSA 9270i TELEPHONE(714)667-0496 FAX(714)667-7962 September 22, 1990 it The Plies Companies 22708 Aspan Street;Suite 701 Lake Forest El Toxo, CA 92630 ATTENTION: W Dan Plies SUBJECT: COAMERCE PARKWAY CROSS-SECTION Dear Mr.Plies: INTRODUCTION In January 1990"Austin-Foust Associates,Inc.,prepared a traffic stbidy for the Commerce 'g Parkway Centre development in Rancho Cucamonga. That study evaluated the areawide impacts of project traffic but did not specirMy address internal circidation other than :o indicate Commerce Parkway should not be consi&-red a truck route and signage should be provided to prevent its becoming such. The question'is now asked "What should bou the cross-section of Commerce ParkwarT ANALYSIS Trip generation for the project ranges from 39,600 ADT up to 47,000'ADT depending upon the alternative land use in question. Peak hoar volumes range from 3,600 to 3,8M total vehicles per hour entering and exiting the site, Virtually none of th6s traffic is through traffic. Therefore, d! Commerce Parkway need not be designed to accommodate 40,000 ADT. Investigation of the peak hour trip assignment of Alternative B (Le., the highest trip generation option)reveals a 3:1 distribution between the Foothill and Arrow Highway entrances. Peak design hour volumes for Commerce Parkway at Foothill are 2,600 yy3 and 800 vph at Arrow Highway. These volumes indicate that a five-lane;section is appropriate u:',Commerce Parkway at Foothill(two inbound,three outbound-with two left-turns and a right turn lane)whereas a thrr;e- lane cross-section(two outbound and one inbound)is adequate at Arrow Highway. For the internal cross-:ection of Commerce Parkway between the approaches to Foothill and Arrow Highway two(2)potential cross-sections are possible. These are three-lane and four- lane cross-sections. The chnice between the two largely depends upon whether or not a raised landscaped median is planar With such a median,a four-lane section would be requited. The r 1� I Mr.Dan Plies September 25, 1990 ® Page T*o F number one lane(inside lane)is each direction would function;f z both a thru and left-tuns lane serving the various internal parking lot driveways. If a raised?median is not planned then a three lane cross-section with the center lane striped as a two-way left-thru lane could adequately serve the travel demand. In either case,the three-lane or four-lane"interior'cross-section of Commerce Parkway must transition into the appropriate"approach"cross-section a few hundred feet in advance of the two entrance/(sits at Foothill and Arrow highway. CDNMUSIONS In summary, it is concluded that used on project trips, the cross-section of Commerce Parkway needs to be five(5)',?anes in advance of Foothill and three(3)lanes the remainder of the segment to Arrow Ilighway un:ess a raised median is constructed in which case a four-lane section is appropriate If you have any queations regarding this report please call. I Sincerely, i r J 1 Fo P1r Enclosures ` I O r II G i1 APPENDIX i �1 :.j it 9 e f dr .mow PROJECT A-n N A • pp 3 r Figure 1-1 VICINITY MAP .E'f�97N��TASS�F�S,+16'iw II i I1 i�i 1 fillVEM agar ( o .1 asae M \ + fill 1 � A i� t 209 rW ` 4L-- 167 . 2st0--lb pro ! FOOTHILL qr 161 �; 410 663-7r 53--► T� 3 R� m 83 362� '� pa ^Iltl CEO 4—72 ARROW HWY � l-A30 87_? 5 1 1 22 237 AM. Q oo Z 1I471 .F `O d-377 W 369-► -� . 'W_m FOOT,.ILL. 260 � orl-g �64 ` 1070-y� 119 1 e ' :9n 15 000 or: n1D` m a :=848 1zs s h 554 .5 o `pV pn0 39 116 ARROW HWY 0 - 49. �. pm Figure III-7 PROJECT GENERATED 'PEAK HOUR VOLUME'S AMrA-FMWTA*SVMnW.AM ALTERNATIVE B rffAil. T®/V-rOB/ST A.*jOC®AT.&S, INC rRAFF/C:_EN.CIr.'EEOING AND TRA vs Po,9rArioN PLANNING - ® 2920 NOR,"H TUSTIN AVENUE SANTA. ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 TELEPHONE(714),667-0496 1 FAX(714)667-7952 rt May 20,1991 ; The Plies Companies J) 22708 Aspan Street,#701 Lake Forest Fi Toro,CA 92630 ATTENTION Mr.Dan Plies SUBJECT: COMMERCE PAR WAY CONFIGURAT10A Dear Mr.Plies ® In September 1990,1 prepared a letter report(copy attached)regarding the cross-sectional design required on Commerce Parkway in Rancho Cucamonga. Attached is a'copy of the recommended geometrics required to implement our recommendation. J From examination of the attached illustration you will note that the respective designs at Foothill and Arrow Highway are straight forward, but the midblock cross-section allows two alternatives. These are shown as Options 1 and 2 E;ther of these options:could operate satisfaoorily. The primary'ifference is that a raised median requires additional width to prevent left turning traffic from stopping in and blocking the thrh lane. With the four-lar_a/raised median option the number 1(inside)lane acts both as a thnlh. a and left-turn lajj; 'If you have any questions regarding these desiFlus,please calb Sincerell, ® ;2'ie0t, Enclosures cc: Ken Linville,Linville Civil Engines', , <�' 1 1 k U sMc ri ca 1n ij 4 MAIISTINravSTASS CIAM ate:. FRAFFiC &N01MJFf 1N6 AND FRANJ/ORrAT/ON 0.1ANNINO k020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 • TELEPHONE(714)657-04W ® FAX (714)667-M2 September 15, 1990 • The Plies Companies 22708 Aspan Street,Suite 701 Lake Forest El Toro, CA 92630 ATTENTION: W.Dan Plies SUBJECT:` COAUMMRCE PARKWAY''CROSS-SEC-17024 Dear Mr.Plies: JNTRODUCL ON In January 1990 Austin-Foust Associatex I=,prepared a traffic study for the Commerce Parkway Centre development in Rancho C;=monga. Tbat'-.udy evaluated the areawide impacts of project traffic but did not specifically addrwss internal circulation other than to indicate Commerce Parkway should not be considered a truck route and sig qge sl buld be provl'ed to prevent its becoming such- The question is now asked"What shfn' be the cross-section of Commerce Parkway? S ANAINSIS Trip generation for the project ranges from 39,600 ADT up 47,000 ADT depending upon the alternative land use in question. Peak hour volumes range from 3,600 to 3,800 total vehicles per hour catering and cdting the site. Virtually none of this traffi:is through Uaf% Therefore, Commerce Parkway need not'-e designed to accommodate 40,0M A.iDT. Investigation of the peak hour trig ,assignment of Alternative F (I.e:, the highest trip generation option)reveals a 3.1 distribution between tha .":-oothill and Arrow Higbway entrances, Peak design hour volumes for Commerce Parkway at Foothill are Z600 vph and SGO vph at Arrow 11ighway, ibese volumes indicate ttlat a five-lane section is appropriate on Coaimerm Parkway at Foothill(two inbound,three outhorm I withh twn left-turns and a right-tum lase;whereas a three- lane cross-section(two outbound and one inbound)F3 adequate at Arrow Highway. For the internal cross-section of Commerce Parkway bcrweca the approaches to Foothill and Arrow Highway two(2)po.ential crate-=tions are possible. These ore duce,-lane and four- lane cross-sections. The choice between the two l.rgely depends upon whether or not a raised landscaped median is planned. With such a median,a four-lane section wuld be required The 1 Mr Tan Plies September 25, 1990 Page Two number one lane(inside lane) in each direction would functions as both ii ihn,,and let-turn lame serving the various~internd parking lot'irivcwa g, if a r 'west median 1s not planned ihen a'!brae lane cross-section wM the center lane striped aa,a two-y-ay lt:n liana lane-cauld adequwtrlq serve the travel demand. In either case,the thr-;e-lane or four-lane"invgior°crDs-section+of Ccmmerce Parkway must transition into the,appiopr ate approach"cross ria a,fewhundred feet ia.advance of, the two entrance/ei its at Foothill and Arne..Mghwsy. C`►NCt,USIONS,-_ In summary, it is concluded that based 3a project trit s, th* cros-sectlw of Commerce i Parkway needs to be five(';�!anes in adv?gce of Foothill and three(3)lanea the remainder of the segment to Arrow Highway unless a rjisec.+edian is constrected is which cue a four-lariF�.ectioa _ is appropriate. If you'have any question: rergrdiag this r^ort ple�ase call. Sincrreiy, c J EFouPE E„cic�_ces , ii I C r, I� APPENDIX i ' 1 I R I f b Y' eC s Ft 5 i e s k f yRw :lt:. � -..Mus SIC 1 ad,pmA N Ek ftw • e MOM I c $ E "•Aril ''l' ^�. \• \,...,, \T��•s ay.'f84 ;45�� �'2y - i i 1 �` � � •�`�� � 6� � it IL ' ; w 00� Os� FOOrriILL v 161 { .— 375 S3 3+-a ��l iz t 14 Aa lt-72 ARROW Hw,r dv 3u 151 23 ryo AM I �' �H no1 6FOOTHILL 250 4 { is 19 15 d 848 124 A 76� - n n 334-40 M' oQ< Ala: 39 Al ARROW WN a:°o 292 49-i' I 1 PM Figure.III-7 >' PROJECT GENERATED PEAK -HOUR VOLUMES 4wrG&ZW.?1vYrowrAsy ffS Ac ALTERNA„1Vc 8 FOOTHILL BLVD. �Jrsy' 1 h P _lee5• zb� �FJ .�' �p--•Iz�so 74, l7Q I � w /.SAC'. 5, , �', •'✓!��• 2 a Y3 ZQ $ TO 15 * tar i%aceran aBdL`--'Oo \B k• as y� o®fix-o ® ASAez�i �' tie': u•Riw zoo- 1 asli T• cargear d7*tlt� 07ACt�H A. i a tad+°' CITY OF Robed` IUWTE PARML MAR 932 6m RANCHO CUCAMONGA J -r TA-TI%'L MRP PLANNING COW41SSION STAFF REPORT TT 14120 - ETI14ANDA HEIGFTS COMPANY f June 26, 1991 ' %. Page 2 Pd E. Site Characteristics: The project site :is currently vacart, With slopes ranging from 3 to 5 percent, sloping from the north. Vegetation consists of'several Eucalyptus windrows and native ,grass and weeds. IL ANALYSIS: A. General: 'he applicant is proposing a Tentative 'Tract Map consisting of a 68-lot subdivisia,. with lots ranging is size from 20,000 square feet is 38,200 square feet with an average lot, size of 25,068'/x:guare feet (see Exhibit "B")• No houses are proposed with this application. The tract is bisected-by the proposed extension,--,of Summit Avenue located to the west of Efiwanda Avenue (see Exhibz-s: Additionally, two of tha'streets proposed with this tract will contract with the ultimate development of Tract 13812 directly to the eat and west. These two streets are Colt Drive and Vintage Drive. B. Design Review Committed:' On October 18, 1390, the Committee (Chit: ea, McN;.el, Coleman) reviewed the project and recommended approval with the following conditions: ll 1. The block wall proposed along Vintage Drive and Summit I Avenue should be designed to be compatible with Tract 13812 4irectly to the west. The wall'sho.ld'include native stone pilasters with.'a pre-cast concz ,te cap.and a split-face block.wall with a split-face cdp., The mortar should match the block color and should be flush with the block face.'-' Pilasters should be designed 24 inches square and spaced a maximum,pf 40.-feet on center. This wall, should be provided on both sides of Summit Avenue and both sides of Vintage Drive. 2. The freeway saund 'attenuation wall should be designed consistent,with the freeway ,wall proposed adjacent to Tract 13812. 3. Street trees should be provided consistent with the regv:zements of the Etiwanda Specific Pian, One" 15-gallon size tree Shall be provided for every 15 fef,t of street frontage, Far the S pe:: fic Plan regtirem_n"r. Trees resul- ng fram the requirements that,cannot bN placed within the parkway because of spacing regniremenlst, should be planted in the front yard of adjacent lots.'' This requirement is in addition's fr•-)nt yard landscaping requirements. ;} N-Z ��(. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ClAft DATE: June 26, 1.99t TO: Chairman and Members of Planni_tg Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Citv Planner BY: Tom. Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT! ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATXVE TRACT 14120 ETINANDA HEIGHTS' COMPANY - A residential.subdivision.of 65 single family lots rA 53.05 acres of land in the Very Law Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per_acre) :of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the north and south Bides of Summit Avenue, approximately 1,300'feet;west of Etiwanda. Avenue"- APN;, 225-111-22 and 225-171-02, 08, i1, and, 16. Staff recommends' issuance of a Negative Declaration. Associated with this project is Tree Reaoval` Permit 91-21. I i I. PROJECT AND SITE DrSCRIPTION: , A. Act:S.on Rearaested: Approval of the subdivision design, Conr;eptual Grading Plan, Ccnceptual Landscape _Plait, and Tree,,, RemJrval Permit and ,issuanaz of a 'mitigated Negative Declarations D. Project Dencity: 1.28 dwelling units per acre. C. Srrroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant and single family residential; Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) ! South - Vacant- Vert Low Residential District (1-2 dwellia5 1 , units pe:: acre) East - Vacant and single family residential; Very Low ' Residential",District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant; Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling ' units per tc:e) and County Residential 3. D. General Plan L!signations: Project Site Vi:ry,Low �-zsidential North - Very?zi-,Residential South - Very Low Residential and Freeway East eery Low,:Res;dential_ . Vest Very Low Residenfiiil and.Open Space ITEM N z !r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14120 ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMW?dl' Jnne 26, 15-:�1 Page 4 The arborigt's report evaluates the windrow condition and recommends the ,preservation "o1 47 Eucalyptus trees. the report addresses only their preservation potential based on } their condition, not on the desiril­aity of :preserving Eucalyptus trees in private yards. Te recommendation of preservation is made with no regard for iot aon£igaration or street alignment. The location of most of the 47 trees will conflict directly with the ultimate development Of the project site. Unfortunately, most of these 47 trees are individual specimens scattered throughout the site makiniT- windrow preservation�}infaasibl_-. Where clusters of trees."are found, or especially desirable specimens, staff r-:commends preserving them pending desig,i review of those lots. I Both the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the Etlwanda Specific Plan allow for the removal of Eucalyptus `windrows with replzaement planting provided as a condition of a Specific Plan establishes a windrow approval. The 50 lineal feet of new windrow planting requirement of plantings peg project acre. Based upon a project acreage of S3.05 acres, a total of 2,653 lineal feet of new Eucalyptus windrow will be prf, „3ed wllth the development of the tract. The location of requirel Ah on-site windrows shall be generally guided by a 330-foot by 660-foot grid pattern. On-site windrow plantings consist of Eucalyptus maculata in 5-gallon size planted 8 feet on,penter. It is apparent that the existing windrows cannot be preserved or ef.:ectively restcred under the proposed project, with a few exceptions. Staff recommends new windrow plantincs as shown in Extibit "F" and selective preservation as required by the conditions in the attached Resolution, III• FWIRONMENTXt ASSESSMENT: Part I of the Initial Study' has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist. Both affected school district�,_wou1 be impacted by this project, h,,RneD a condition requiring participation in `z Mello-Roos "funding district has been included. In adelit-on, the project, proposed the removal of the majority of the on-site Eucalyptus windrows. The arborist-:report indicates ",hat only 9 percent if Vie trees are worth reservat' �. of preservation. A_ mitigation, the.project trip be conditaaed to replant the windrows per 'Etiwanda Specific Flan requirements. Therefore, although the project could have 5,significant effect`in the se areas, staff found that 'there ,�iI ^oot be a significa,it effect in this case because of the mitigatioi_ `-aasures which,have been included as Conditions of Approval. _ Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. N-q ,( PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14120 - ETIWANDA$EIGHTS COMPANY 3une 26, 1991 Page .3 s C. Grading & Technical Review Committee: {The project was reviewed by oth Committees and determined, with the recommended Condi _ons of Approval, to be in conformance with app!icrble standards and ordiranceg. D. Trail Advisor_ Commiatee• The project was reviewed by the Committee and recommended for approval subject t to] certain modifications to trail locations (see. Exhibit --H-). All recommendations. of the Committee have been incorporated into the project by the applicant. ".'he proposed trail locations are shown in Exhibit -1-1) E. Freeway Richt-of-Way- Caltrans is currently in the process of j re-determining the ncrth property lire of the freeway rights-of-way which may affect the location of the south Property line of Tract 14120, and consequently the location of the scund attenuation wall. Engineerig Conditions of Approval will hold issuance of bri::ding pevmits for hots 55-58 until the south property line can be accurately determined'. These lots will not be reduced in aize, they may however, be Am i increased through the rights-of-way determination. The Conditions of Approval will require the construction of a sound attenuation wall subject to a` final acoustical analysis. Should the south property line chance saeia:Kd attenuation capabilities will remain consistent a*, top of sound barrier elevations in the acoustical analysis gill remain consiste:t. F. Tree Removal Permit 91-21 Within project boundaries, there are eight mature Eucalyptus windrows containing 496 trees consisting of a variety of Eucalyptus trees (Blue Gum, Desert Gum, River Red Gum, and Silver Dollar Gum), Arizona and one California Wild Lilac, An ar ' report va' borist s re prepared to address the Port and condition of these trees Exhibit "E" id , and identifies their location. .One of the windrows (Windrow "G!- of the arborist report) is located in direct -'conflict with right-of'-way improvements ffr -Summit Avenue. Tree Removal Permit 90-14, associatEd with the development of Tract 13812 to the west, was approved on October 3; 1990, and regulates the trees to be removed and also conditions for their replacement (see Exhibit "ry"), Although the arborist's report identifies that several, trees in this windrow are candidates for preservation, sta.7f is recommending that they be removed because of necessary street alignment. Tree replacement on the south side of Summit shall consist of Eucalyptus macutata in 15-gallon minimum size planted 8 feet on center. N-_3 - 77 7 f1 VL' 1 VL lit MY VL LL ;�S I TT 4 i h.• Via.. �.l ,�.1_XIGEamme �V I C T O Y p C p M. M N CITY OF Rr1 TCI�®�`UCAP-bNoTA PLANMNG FJIVISION Th-LE: ', :E7CgiIB1T: A SCALE: Al- 6 ,S' PLANNF''.G'COMMISSION 'STAFF P.EPORT TT 14120 - ETIWASDA-HEIG)Ti COMPANY j Jut.e 26, 199'i AM Page 5 - IV, FACTS FOR FINDINGS:' The project is consistent with the'-General' Plan,`' Development Code, and,the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will not be aetrimental to the public health or safety or cause nuisance,i significant environmental impacts. In addition, the propased Site Plan, together with the-^ecommende6 Conditions of Approval, is in compliance with the epplicable provisions of the Development Cod_, the Etiwanda S cific p.^ Plan, and.City Standards: V. CORRESPONDEL-E: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the inland:Valley Daily Bulletin, the property was posted, and. notices have been sent to all proparty owners within 300(:Tee--of = the project site i VI'. RECOMMENDATION e Staff recommends issuanc of a mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of Tentative Tract 1412G, and associate Tree Removal Permit 91-21, through adoption of the attache,' Resolution. Respect gS"ub. ted. r Brad ler City Manner BS•TG/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Tract; Map Exhibit "C", Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Tree,Location Map Exhibit "F" - Tree Replacement Plan Exhibit "G" - Tree Removal Permit No. 90-14 Exhibit "N" - Trails Advisory Comment Sheet Exhibit "I" - Trails Plan Exhibit "J" - Phasing Plan. Resolution of Approval . 1 '''' 01 i� r y�.��{y , aecTron cyo t -tom i WRRR Mfi1C �•n m..11 s ,a ram :I1'Y OF RAtTCiu.�uC,=�1MON�A Tt'EIvL F PLANNi?'+1G B�i'I:aION •rrrLE:C�+(�/iry �1 )A: p;f__ EXHlBrr:``lJ1 SCALE: JV — � �.t.,T.V,,tAb•/Na1.114[7 Y,-�+t � � dw� .. y• r.s we w.w Y I� .9 .� S�aq ti•yw.Yemm�•+.. 1 � J rGn--. 9� I ♦�o�..Y.+�.�..w.ns.nsrrn.�.:ao..s� --'�t .� ;r ,�..,,.� t i.»�Y L.� �•� 17 r _ ��'Tl�'�•ol %•$ � �f —•�+-. � !,� —�•+ ji- � . • . .�a YOT v OF UCAVIONGA FLA1�INllgt F�IVISION, <'TTI.E� EXHIBM SCALE: '2 1 P.C. ENDA of 6' 0701-, 2 JUNE AG 6 199l'- F I �Y I 11. 1 �• �F ip 41 gm I AA elf AK ima cx OF RAINCHO"CUCAMONGA PI 1\TLtTiIV�r 'I TtSI4N TrrLE: ry tY{� _ EXHIBf:: t iZ SCALE: N- 9 T K • t 1 :' -'°' f S ��: - ry , per: • � , s� ���' � f,:.. fi fps a 5�> ♦�f, t� 'f:Pd s. Rt: 1'. >✓� .��# fins ��7� , J ♦' 3 r +i 3� r^F 10.�1if Y .Y LO YIt6�� Y 7 �.. � .� ♦i PC Jv �t 1� Al i s SUMAT WE 21 31 '22 6cofn �QC?t p}tq ' ... N • �B ' 3.�L• � r j 23 �T ' T T o �33 - }6 T T • � r. i in. v ,i 1 41 42 43 b Z N • crry OF. �C UCAMONGA ITEM: &ao wION TTr.E: QP i aJ . N c� EXHIBIT.- SCALE, J � r �$ f ICE tJ iL�, W ®lu . sb F. t r.. ..... ppgq .J k CONSERVE TREES 11/06/90 TREE NO S^ECIES TRUNK DIAM TOT RECOMMEND A002. E6 42 24.5 CONSERVE A016. EG 32 25.5 CONSERVE �'A017.r EG 69+ 26.0 OW485Z tA019. EG 34 25.0 -�IkA020. EG 39 27.0 B021. EG 12 `23.5 CONSERVE FB026. EG 44 24.5 WMWaWfp B078. EG 32 24.6 CONSERVE C032. EG 14 28.0 CONSERVE C034. EG 12 24.0 CONSERVE CO51. EG 11 25.0 CONSERVE C060. EG 25 27.5 CONSERVE CO61. EG 16 27.5 GWj~ f 153. ES 27 29.5 GOWPFAWS D00s, EG 45 25.0 CONSERV= D007. EG 13 27.5 'CONSERVE D008. ES 13 75.5 LONSERV,' D016. EG 40 26.0 CONSEREi D022. EG 32 26.0 sW466RW E003. ER- 10 29.0 CONSERVE It,E008. ER 12 25.5 . -),-EO31. ER 30 29.0 Sat F030. EG 29 27.5 CONSERVE F032. EG 32 28.5 CONSERVE F033. EG 52 29.5 CONSERVE 3E jk 6021. EG 10 22.5 7F 'K 6048. Es 4,5" 23.5 GOWDEAW dF a*8057. EG 10 25.5 �f -k6059. ER 64 25.0 aWAGBAW ?k'8075. ER 34 26..5 U(/ d LA?J Y (hi 6101. ER 10 28.. CONSERVE' (thkf4JUS AA-i. 6102. ER 13 27.0 CONSERVE t G104. ER 13 26.0 CONSER'E '�ilE PGt,YlOV2r �'Jl1NAN�� 6106. ER 22 28.5 CONSERVE f 6107. ER 13 2-5 CONSERVE Avmtu@ cikatS [NA��(PJCWIQ�II{�j *HO07. EC 23 22.0 eOWMAVE ` -cHO13. EC 21 25.5 *HO14. EC 33 26.0 GBMGFOW IM015. EC 36 09.0 Yc H016. EC 19 15.0 68 Rw"`R H017. EC 36. 25.5 *Hole. EC 15 25.0 *HO19. EC 19 24.5 :k H020. EC 13 25.0 *H023. EC 34 28.5 *H028.1 EC 16 29.0 aE11032, ES 30 25.0 H034. EC 21 28.0 eeNqeRVL- *H047. EC 26 26.0 H048. EC 17 24.5 t *HO84. EC 48 30.0 m3i. Iva HI 10. EG 22 26.5 £E?;at-3VLb A001. EG 16 21..0_ REMOVE t (53 )TREES 3 /V_/8 44 o' DO lin r +z C `t r 43 lb t R� rev OF I TCT , .UCAMCNGA 1TEM:1«12� i F.L.ANil 'r'D.�VISIOI� -- --- �( iv EXHIBIT. SCALE: /U-17 CONSERVE TREES 11/06/90'' " TREE tLij SPECIES TRUNK WAM TOT'"RECOMMEND B039. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE B040. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE B041. EG 31 22.0 REMOVE: B042. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE 9043. EG 30 19.0 FIDI E B044. EG 40 18.0 REMOVE 8045. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE B046. EG 25 16.5 REMOVE B047. EG 10 -0.0 REMOVE., 8048. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE B049. EG 10 9.5 REMOVE BO50. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE.' BI111. EG 10 20.0 REMOVE BOa2. EG 36 18.5 REMOVE- BOW. EG CJO 0.0 REMOVE B034. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE B055. ER 00C 0.0 REMOVE 1i 8056. EG 24 17.0 REMOVE' B057. EG it 21.0 ,REMOVE $058. EG 28 _.16.0 REMOVE B059. EG 18 16.5 REMOVE B060. EG 16 0.0 REMOVE B061. EG 33 15.5 REMOVE B062. EG 13 15.5 REMOVE B063. EG 22.0 REMOVE B064. EG 25 19.0 REMOVE \ B065. EG 28 0.0 REMOVE B065.1 EG 19 1i:v'RENw'!!E B066. EG 29 16.0 REMOVE B067. £G 000 17.5 REMOVE 8068. EG 7 14.0 REMOVE 60'0. EG 14.0 REMOVE B070. EG 34 21.0 REMOVE B071. EG 15 18.5 REMOVE y B0,72. Era 3G 20.0 'REMOVE �. W3. EG 29 17.5 REMOVE B074. EG 4 0.0 REMOVE B075. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE B076. EG 16 21.0 REMOVE B07:. EG 33 21.0 ''REMOVE B079.. EG 27 19.0 REMOVE BOBO. EG I0.0 REMOVE B081 EG 40 16.5 REMOVE BOB2. EG 17 16.5 REMOVE. COOL EG 21 0.V RE14OVE C002. En' 3.`: 0.i�� REMOVE COOS. EG 30. 22.6-, RFMJVE _ 0004. EG 33 17.0 `REMOVE f' / r' C005. EG 24 20.0 =REMOTE C006. EG 22 15.0 REMOVE C007. EG 10 15.5 'REMOVE COO7.1 ES 000 24.0- REMOVE COOS. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE l\ 1l (159 )TREES T 1✓✓f N - � s {� y ir CONSERVE TREES i u-06f90 TREE NO -rECIES TRUNK I1IAM TOT RECOMMEND A003, _G 42 21.5 REMOVE A004. EEG 7, 20.0 REMOVE JJ A005. E8 31 C21.0'`REMOVE A006.. ED 15 0.0 REMOVE c A007. ED lb 21.5 ,REMOVE A008. ED 25 21.0 REMQV-c A009.. E6 26 21.5 REMOVE A010. E6 19 19.0 REMOVE: 1 - A011. E8 32 20.0_REMOVE A012. E6 21 21.5"-kik-VE A013. ED 000 20.5 REMOVE A014. E& 36 21.5 REMOVE , A015. ED :4 22.5 REMOVE vy A018. CA 0.0 REMOVE A021. „ AC xl 17.5 REMOVE A022. ED -.40 18.0` REMOVE J A023. ED v 19.0 REMOVE B001. E6 33 2 .0 REM3VE B002. E6 P 23,0 REMOVE B003. E6 13 23.0 RJr jOVE B004. E8 17 0.0 REMOVE B005.0 ED 6 0-0 REMi1VE B006,, ED 15 0.0 REMOVE B007. E8 12 0.0 REMOVE BOMB. ED 000 24.5 REMOVE i B009. ED 6 18.0 REMOVE • B010. ED 6 18.0 REMOVE B011. ED 000 20.0 REMOVE B012. ED 000 19.0 REMOVE B013. ED 15 0.0 PEMOVE B014. ED 000 21.5 REMOVE r B015. E8 000 21.5 REMOVE B016. ED 17 12.Q -REMOVE B017. E8 000 23.5 REMOVE B018. ED 34 19.0 REMOVE B019. ED 15 20.0, REMOVE Bv0. ED 11 20.5 REMOVE B022. ED 23 ' 22.5 REMOVE - B023. E8 7 0.0 REMOVE B024. ED 4.5 0.0 REMOVE B025. ES 3 0.0 REMOVE 9027. ED 17 15.0 REMOVE 8028. EG 20 1B.5 REMOV& 9029. E8 26 14.5 R1 OVE -ft B030. E8 24 15.5 RE�3VE B031. ES 4 0.0 REMOVE B032. ED 3.5 0.0, REMOVE e B033. ED 16 14.0" REMOVE 8034. "F_8 3 0.6 REMOVE B0v5• 06 16 16.5 REMOVE B036. ED j 28 20.5 REMOVE B037. ED U 000 21.0 REMOVE ED 28 21.Cv REMOVE �1 (lob )TREES Xtfit CC �Il CONSERVE varze 11/06/90 TREE NO SPECIES TRUNK DIAM TOT RECOMM:Nn D002. ED 12 0.0 REMOVE L .13, E8 50 10.0 REMOVE D004. E6 21 11.5 REMOVE Dv05.'1 ED 3 0.0 REMOVE s� D006. ED 43 13.0 REMOVE, DO09. ED 41 21.5 REMOTE DO10. ED 36 17.0 REMOVE s DO11. EP 000 0.0 REMOVE �•. DO12. ED 10 19'.0 REMOVE DO13. E8 28 16.5 REMOVE DO14. ED 5 0.0 �REMOVE DO15. E8 000 13.0 REMOVE 1-1016. E6 3 23.5 REMOVE I D017. ED 37 20.0 'REMOVE DO19. ED 34 10.5 REMOVE D020. €D 34 13.5 REMOVE D021. ED 3 27.5 REMOVE D023. ED 12 ,11.0 REMOVE 0024. ED 32 13.0 REMOVE D025. ED 39` ; 13.0 REMOVE DO26. ED 28 15.5 REMOVE D027. ED 24 19.0 REMOVE D028. ED 21 0.0 REMOVE D029. ED 32 15.5 REMOVE E001. ER 18 23.0 REMOVE " E002. ER 13 26.0 :REMOVE E004. ER 000 29.5 REMOVE E005. ER, OOD 19.5 REMOVE E007. ER 12 18.5 REMOVE E009. ER 000 26.5 REMOVE E010. AC 9 17.5 REMOVE E011. ED 000 0.0 REMOVE `tr E012. ED 59 12.0 REMOVE E013. ED 48 20.5 REMOVE E014. ED 000 0.0 REMOVE E015. ER 000 0.0 REMOVE ° E016. ED 43 9.5 REMOVE E017. ED 000 0.0 REMOVE E018. ED 000 7.5 REMOVE E019. ED 84 10.0 REMOVE E020. ED 17 14.5 REMOVE E021. ED 13 18.0 REMOVE E022. ED - 17 11.5 REMOVE E022.1 ED 6 29.5 REMOVE g E023. EG 78 11.5 REMOVE E02_-N.1 "ES 3 0.0 REMOVE E024. 'ES 16 18.0 REMOVE E025. ED 30 17.5 REMOVE E026. ED 34 15.5 "REMOVE E026.1 ED 2.5 22.0 REMOVE E027. ER 30 0.0 REMOVE -. E028. ED 48 11.5 REMOVE E029.• ED 40 14.5 REMOVE (265 )TREES ; .. Z.2- _E 5 CCN5ERVE TREES I U06f 90. TREE NO SPECIES "TRUNK DIAM TOT RECOMMEND' C009. Es 000 0.00 REMOVE CO10. EG 7,7 .19.5 REMOVE COIL. EG 13 00 REMOVE i C012. EG 7 15.0 REMOI C013. EG 9 0.0 REMOVE C014. EG 10 0.0 REMOVE, C015. EG 1& 0.0 REMOVE C016. EG _ 8 6.0 REMOVE C017.. EG 21 14.0 REMOVE CO16. EG 10 0.0' REMOVE C019. EG 10 16.5 REMOVE CO20. cG 29 15.0 REMOVE CO21. EG 8 3.6 REMOVE CO22. EG 32= 23.0 REMOVE CO23. EG 12 0.0 REMOVE j r} CO24. ES 8 0.0 REMOVE CO25. 'EG 28 19.0 REMOVE CO26. EG 13 17.5 REMOVE ii CO27. EG ' 4 17.0 REMOVE CO27.I EG 000 0.0 REMOVE CO28. EG 000 - 0.0 REMOVE CC 9. EG 3 0..0 REMOVE C030. EG 32 _ 14.0 REMOVE C031. EG S 0.0 REMOVE CO3:3. EG 9 0.0 REMOVE 4j C035., EG 41 20.0 REMOVE <' C036. ES 6 10.5 REMOVE C037. ES 9: 0.9 REMOVE C038. EG 12 17..0 REMOVE C039. EG 13 17.0 REMOVE 01W. EG 10 0.0 REMOVE C041. EG 23 15.5 REMOVE C042. AC 5.5 20.9 REMOVE C04:. EG 38 21,O REMOVE C0444 ES 22 19.5 REM1314E C045. EG 9 0.0 REMOVE C046. EG 7: 19.5 REMOVE C047. EG 10 20.0 REMOVE C046. EG 6 0.0 REMOVE C049. EG 10 21.5 REMOVE C050. ES 5 0.0 REMOVE CO52. EG 's 0.0 REMOVE C05a. EG 16 16.0 REMOVE ;- f CO54. EG S 0.0 REMOTE C055. EG 36 0.0 REMOVE i[ C056. EG. 4 0.0 REMOVE ; C057. EG 36 0.0� REMOVE C058. EG 20 16.5 REMOVE COS. EG 12 24.0 REMOVE C062, EC, 3 22.0 REMOVE C064. EG 7 '0.0 REMOVE f. C065. EG 43 251„'Ll REMOVE D001. EG 000 0.0 REMOVEr (2112 )TREES ��4 11 �� a CONSERVE TREES I 11606/90,( ; TREE NO SRECIES TRUNK DIAM jOT RECOMMEND G016. EGA "000 T 21,.5 REMOVE G017, EG 5 21.5 REMOVE j, i;018.` EG 5 20.0 REMOVE 6019. EG 6 n19.5 REMOTE ` 6020. EGA 9 20.5 REM q!E 3022. EG 000 0..0 � REMOVE 6023. EG 5 23.0 REMOVE Cv024; EG c; '22.0 REMOVE 9025. ER 26 , ' 100 REMOVE G026. ES 1.5 0.0 REMOVE G 27. ES 2s 4.0 REMOVE 602F.., EG 3 0.0 REMOVE 6024. EG 6 21.5 REMOVE f 8''30. Oa :3.5 0.0 REMOVE 8031. EG 12 0.0 REMOVE 8032. EG 41 16.w REMOVE II ' 8033. ES 4 0.E REMOVE 8034. EG 7 0.0 REMOVE S035. EG 5 0.,0 REM04 8036. ER 28 1.i.,5 REMOVE EG 3 16.0 REMOVE' G038. ER; 22 17.0 REMOVE 6039. ES 4,3 1B.5 ,REMOVE 6040. EG 40 2S.0 REMOVE 8041. EG 4 2C 0 REMOVE Aft 8042. EG 5 21.0 REMOVE 6043. EG, 10 0.0 REMOVE 6044. EG 11 20.5 REMOVE 6045., ES 7 22.0 REMOVE G046. EG 44 12.0 _REMOVE 6047. EG 8 19.0 R4K. VE 6049. EG 4 0.6 REMOVE 8050. EG 20 9.0 REMOVE i- 0051. EG 4. 0.0 REMOVE G052. EG 2 0.0 REMOVE 0053. EG 31 9.5 -REMOVE 6054. EG_ 2 0.0 REMOVE 6055. EG 2 0.6 REMOVE 6056. EG 5 0.0.z. REMOVE G059. EG 000 n 0.0 REMOVE 6060. EG 6,6 ', 0.0 RtHOVEI 6061. EG 2 0.0 REMDUr 8062. EG $ 20.5 REMOVE G063. EG 0'p 121.0 REMDVE 8064. EG 7 0.0 REMOVE 6065. EG 9 0.0 REMOVE 0066.' EG 9 21.5 REMOVE 6067. ES Q00 N.5 REMOVE 'F 6068. ER 36 22.0 REMOVE 6069. EG 4 0.0 REMOVE. 6070. EG 12 0.0 REMOVER 6071. ES 4 20.0 REMOVE. i 6072. EG 19 9.5 REMOVE' (371 )TREES '2 �� � 7i `i ✓✓I�� 1 CONSERVE TREES 11/06/90 Tn_,NO SPECIES TRUNV DIAM TOT RECOMMEND EuQu., ER 4.5 -26.5-, R8il09E E032. °'. AC 13 21.5;r REMOVE EQ 3� EG' 417 12.5.: REMOVE E034. kc, 00o 0.0 REMOVE' � ECQ% ER f 301i 22.0 REMOVE F00i` EG 33 17.5 REMOVE F002 EG 32 14.0 ` REMOVE 1 F003. EG O00 00 REMOVE F004. EG 24 1i.0 REMOVE FOO5. EG, 5i. 10.0 REMOVE F006. EG 20 9.0 REMOVE F007. EG 12 0.0 tt REMOVE. �;; FOOS. EG 26 8.0 REMOVE F009. EG 48 11.0_ REMOVE F010. EG 32 19.5 REMOVE F611., EG 26 20.0 REMOVE `FO12 fi EG 20 1S.0 'REMOVE, s,, F013. EG 4 20,5',.REMOVE ' F014. EG 000 0.0 hEMCVE F015. EG 40 15.0 ,RWQ . F016. EG 000 0.�0 REMOvi F017. EG 40 13.5 REMOVE,-' F01B. EG 50 18.0 ';REMOVE FU19. EG 0.0 REMOI,E Ash F020. EG 8 18.O_ REMOVE F021. EG "Ll 21.5'" REMOVE F022. EG 000 0.0 1,"'EMOV F023. EG 63 18.,y )OVE F024. EG 33 15 F025. EG 32 F026. EG 000 0.0 F027. EG '' 40' 18.5 REMOVE F028. EG 000, 0.0 REMOVE,, F029. EG 35 '7.0 REMOVE':-"'- F029.1 EG 22 20.0� REMOVE F031. ' ES 000 22.5 REMOVE' F034. EG 22 23,5 REMOVE..') FO;rS. EG OOO 24.0 REMOVE` 6001. CX 000 0.0 REMOVE 8002. EG 7 22.0 REMOVE 6003. EG 000 25.0 REMOVE GO04. EG 19: 15.5-REMOVE, ia005. EG 0.0 REIISV,E.: G006. EG ,27 8.5 REMOVE GO07. EG 2 0.0 REMOVE.' ER 34 17.0 REMOVE G049: EG 6 23.0 'REMOVE.'' " GO10 EG 5 29.5 REMOVE 12 12.0 REMOVE vci EG 6 24.0,. REMOVE ' GCtiT EG 4 0.0 REMOVE ��GU1 EG 5 0.0 RE' .7E = r GO 5q,.,- EG 5 Cs.0 ftEP10VE .,` J C318 i TREES ,,�( 11. iC; c> CONSERVE TREES ,. { IIil0.pf90" TRE } E NO SPECIES ,7RUNk At9MA TV 6LiCOMMrlD �� H03b. E'6 T `?4 15.0 REMOVE ; Hf/37. EG 13 0.0 RE Mr j On. EG 30 MO -REMOVE 4639. EB 24 0.0 : ,REMOVE H040. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE { H041. EG -000 Q.0 REMOVE H042. EG 21 0 REMOVE H043. EG 21 ' I REMOVE H044. EC 000 f�.,u.0 '`REMOVE . H045. EC 000 r 27.0 REMGVE H446. EC 15 0:11 REMOVE, H049. EC 30 26.0 REMOVE 14050. EC 40 27.0 REMOVE- rl H051. EC S 0.0 REKWE H052. EC 5 28.S. " REhtivs H053. EL' 16 0.G' REMOVF -=l HO54. E%- . j H055. IF 56 0.0 REMGVE , r 30.0 CEMOVf. J'r H056. (, t ;23 14.0 REMOVE H057. E 38 0..0 REMOVE H059. 30 0.0 REMOV€; H060.� ICES---..`! a3 19.0 REMOVE ip H061.- ; EG. 32 13.0 REMOVE i H062. AEG 30 14.0 +REMOVE 1 H063. EG 34 0.0 REMOVC" H064. EG` ;, 42 0.0 REMOVE H065. EG 36 12.5 REMOVE H066. EG 24 "0.0 REMOVE H067., EG 30 1,9:0, REMOVE 4068. ••.. EC 30 19.A REMOVE ,1 H069. EC 11 19.0 ,REMOVE H070. EC 16 0.0 REMOVE H071. EG r' 50 0.0 REMCIVE H072. EC ,5 0.0 REMOVE H073. EG 28 22.0 RE+MGVE HO74. EG 28 0.0 REMOVE H075. EG ` 24 15.0 REMOVE H076. )cW 10 0.0 REMOVE H077. EG 26 0.0 REH.04! H078. EC 14 0.0 REMVE' . H079. EC 40 22.5 REMGVE H080. EC' 6 0.0: REMOVE H081. EC- 3' 0.0 REMOVE 4082. Sc 6 0.0 REMOVE H083. EC 6 0.0 REMOVE ` f H085.. EC b O.d REMOVE H086. EC 12 0.0 REMOVE t HOB . EG ` 38 0.0 REMOVE H08B., EC 14 28.,5 REMOVE H089. EG 32 O.! P,EMOVE H090.' EG 22 0.0 REMOVE H091d EG 30 0.6 REMOVE H092. EG 24 14.0 REMGVE 1 (477 )TREES CONSERVE TREES ` TREE NO SFECiEB TRJNk: DIEM 70F RECdMtEND G073. EG 14 13 0 REMOVE J G6,4. EG 4 U.0. REMOVE 1 G076. EG -3 0.0;" REMOVE G077. EFZ s ood, 21;"0 REMOVE G078. EG` 00.0 0.0 REMOVE : G079.. ER 000 0.0 REMOVE „ 6080. EG: 2.5 a 0.0 REtIdVE ,ti G081. EG 000 17..0 REMOVE G082. EG 000 0.0" 4EMOVE 6083. EG 900 4.0, REM'u=VF G084.. ES 000 0.0, FE,MOVE ! �I 6085. EG L00 0.0 REMOVE G086. EG 000 0.0 'REMOVE: ' G087. EG 5 .20.0 .REMOVE i G088. EG 000 0.0 "FtEMGVE 6089. EG 099 -10.0 REMD* G090. EG 1s 9.2- 6Ei1OVE G091. EG .000 0.0��FEMOVE 6092. EG 000 .:o 5 ;REMOVE G093. EG 5 '^I, REMOVE G094. EG 000 0.0 FEMOVE G095. EG 4 0.0 REMOVE 6096. EG; 000 0.0 REMOVE 6097. EG boo 0.0 'REMOVE G098. EG 000 9.5, 'PZMOVE 6099. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE G100. EG Ol'0 0.0 1REMOVE G103. ER 6 23,5 PEMOVE 6105. ER B 22.6 KEMOVE H001. EG 11 15.5 REMOVE } Y H002. EG i5 0.0 REMOVE H002.1 EG 14 0.0 REMOVE c` H003. EG 8 0.0. REMOVE H004. ER 26 25.5 '-REMOVE H005. ER Z, 0.0[ REMOVE H006.. EG:. 30 0.0 REMOVE H008. r EG 54 22.b' REMOVE H0090 EC '14 14.0 REMOVE H010. EG' 35 12.0 REMOVE ~`l Moll. EG ' 50 0.0' REMOVE H012. EC 29 27.0 REMOVE H021. EC 44 24.5 REMOVE H0 c. EG 24 0.0 REMOVE H024. XX' 30 0 0 - REMOVE H025. EEG 32 17.0 REMOVE H026. EG 19 0.0 rF#mOVE _.._ H027. EG 22 17.0 REMOVE H028. EG 28 17.0 REMOVE H029.0 EG 44 0.0� REMOVE H00. EG 000 0.0 REMOVE, H031. EG 6 0.0 REMOVE H033. ' EG 000 25.n- REMOVE f Ht�3S. EG 0.6' REMOVE (424 )TREES r , City of Ranchc*'Cucamonga, Ter*,ative trivet 14120, Arborist Report, i `` page 9 KEY 'rb L)A'!A CHARTS The first;20 page chart:lists'the tree number, spec4e':, trunk.dCaMeter, height l 1 and crown:width el'asses, condition ratings, and,initial. recomiiandation-:i�r .=aeh tree. The condition rafting sastem shown in R:Tahle 6^ i'� the one used in the f chart ABBR_EVIA9:IONCZ (� � I EG,. = Eucalyptus glcb.rlus,-t�iue`'gum "� ER Eucalyptus rudis, desert giim =.ucalyptus dainaldulensis; river red gum E"o.,slypi'us 661yanthemos,:SilIver d�l;iar gum CA - ,,up�evsus glabra, M arizonira), ,Arizona cypress AC e „ „ „ n CX - i�at�oth'us s�pJy Gal ifornia wild 1 41ac NO- = .Rumbev, SP = Species' 'TR = Trunl,':tr,t,.ks DIA = Diamet�`� DIAM = CR = CrownlF BR = Branch, braxche;�j�ranching - TN = Twig, twigs LV = Leaf, leaves iP = Insects & diseases,; insects & decay Ah RT = Root, soots JOT = -Total ELB- - Eucalyptus iongicorn borer' r A.G. = Above ground 7 c: Wf - = With HEIGHT CLASSES A = to 30 ft B _ 30 to 50 ft C = 50 to 80 ft - D = 80 to 100 ft E = over 100 ft CRWON VIDTH CLASSES i A to 20 it B = d0 to 46 ft I C = 40 to 60 ft D = over 60 ft 1� a Prepared by- Paul E. Chaney, Certifield Arhorist 136 f'` ` CONSERVE TREES 11/06/90AISL j TREE NO $FECIE3 TRLINt: DIAM TOT �ECOMDttND ( H093. EG 301, H094. EG 21 ' 0.0 REMOVEt�r H095. EG .40 1 6.0 REMOVE, H096. EG 19 0.0 REMOVE f/ 'HO97. EG 60 0.0 REMOVE H096. EG 4 0.0 REMOVE H099 EC 36 2F.0 REMOVE H100. EG 30 27.5 REMOVE H101. EG 33 23.5 REMOVE H102. EG 30 ; 12.5 REMOVE H103 EG 46 1.11."0 --REMOVE � t H164. E3 36 0.0 REMOVE H105. EG 42 14.5 REMOVE H106. EG 000 . 0.0 REMOVE H107. k:G 38 1^+.5 REMOVE I HiCB �}G li) 0.0 REMOVE H109 i.G' °1 4'3 21.0 REMOVE f Hill �'.G - 000 18,0 REMOVE H112. I G 000 22.5"<REMFIVE (496 )TREES I It N ! E (496 X`TREES ` �� „�� A AMML - 1 m _ y ;fir' C f I .� •`p�� .e66� Pon o u � a p e • :i.e. LoT i• r Ty OF I CHOP�—i" UCANIOIVGA i TTTTLE:Tvp PLANNING-DSI©N .n a Tt EXHIBIT: SCA,.LE:' . 1 c3 c. No e fill materials shall be placed within the drip line of an,�„tree in access;of 18 inches in depth and d. No substantial compaction of the soil within the drip line of any tree shall be undertaken; and e. No construction, including structures ,and walls, that disrupts the root system shall be, permitted. As a Su ideline , no cutting of roots should occur within a times th distance equal to 3 and 1/2 e trunk diameter, as measured at ground level; and T. Eucalyptus trees to be preserved �r provisions for, deep ;waterin anaha7l have adequate ; g limited,J surface ` watering within 25 feet of trunk. 4• R6placement planting ;shall occur at the dip in tJ)e Summit Avenue street alignment where the entire windrow was roan from the South side of the right-af-way. Pr urea- el estimate a Y itninar f ur..h Y es is to cont�ilineal, g , et Tree replacement spacing Shall be at ae8 fof street frontage. ieet on 5. Tree replacement shall consist (Spotted of Eucalyptus maculate Gum) in gallon size minimum, and properly staked. 6. Tree replacemintJ shall be shown on the Summit Avenue Stet Improvement Rlai/s, subject to City Planner and City Engineer review and appOval prior to conmencement of work. This perm t ,'s valid for 90 days from the date of final map recordation "or Building Permit issuance, whichever<occurs first. Extensions may be granted upon written 're request. deEision i 90 This,s final un 1 ess a Appeals must be filed withpthe Secretary of the calen�Plannar ing Commission in writing together with a .S62.00 appeal fee. If You have an G, ���-- y questions, please call Tom Grahn at (71�4) 989-1861. 2164MUNIT DEVELOP NT DEPARTMENT -PLA ING IVISI Da olemmin Principal Planner DC:TG:js Attachment: Tree Removal Plan VIT 6 -3/ } CITY OF RA..-xHo CUCA.moNi.-A 16ia'Y'C5"v,2 Center Drive,Post Office boa 807 (71;f)983.1851 Rancho Clicamvnga,California 91729. fax.M41 967•t 99 - October 30, 1990 Larry Lewis Watt Inland Empire 9035 Haven Avenue, Suite Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 90-14 (Associated with Etiwanda Sf2cific Plan Amendment 90-01) n Dear Fir. Lewis: ', D The Planning D�4isior# has approved your request 'for removal of Eucalyptus°trees conflicting with rights-of-way improvements for Summit Avenue. Ordinance amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan allowing for this tree removal was approved by the City Council on September 19, 1990, and became effective on October, 19 1990. Staff has determined that your request is in keeping with the intent of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Tree Preservation, Ordinance in that only those trees-in direct conflict with Summit Avenue street improvements V014 be removed,, J Therefore, your Tree Removal Permit has betin ap,`P sed subject to the , k 'k following conditions: 1. This permit allows for Ithe remova of 108 Eucalyptus trees whose locatinn_��^f±;ct5 with rights-of-way improvements for Summit Avenue. This figure is approximate and may require an adjustment, plus or minus, in the, total number of trees removed. t 2. All trees proposed for removal shall be clearly marked for inspection and verification by the Planing Division prior`to\ commencement of work. 3. Care}�hal1 be exercised- by all individilals, developers and contrntors working near the trees to be preser`4d to insure ' that ,(o damage occurs to 'these trees. A11 construction shalt -' preserve and protect the health of trees ,to remain, and new trees planted to replace those removed, in accordance with the following measures: a. No substantial disruption or removal of structural or absorptive roots of any tree shall be petjformed; sad b. No fill material shall be placed within 3 feet from toe outer trunks or circumference of any tree; ..and 0 COYIIrifa9nllter5 �� � �j a ,Navb William) Alexander Charles.),8uquetA Gt�Nanarn :V Dennis L.Stout DeborahN.11" n j�30Pamela J.WJght lack Urn,A1CP i. ��/ ,, _ . so-"* gamma LOCAL, a 1 -�• N�v� i obi. i w� •Y�Y 1 A��M tl s C=pre w6aale �� .o w—w �` ,ll •JI .Mw � e rNl a a � ssffi yr t�� _.�.• ; �.Y .CST- . l•. LOT r.4 i( limp jj X ' arEm: CITY OF RANCHO ,�UCAMONGA PLANNING DMSIOI TITLE: EXHIBIT, T SCAL]ij 33 j J TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 'COMMENT SHEET FEBRUARY 20, '1991 Project Descriptions u n,Tentative Tract 14120 -_, Etiwanda kci hts DevelODMadt Company. - A residential subdivision of 68 single family lotsj�,nn 53 acres of land in \\ the Etiwanda"Specific Plan area,1ocated on the6'io�th and south sides of Summit Avenue, 1,300 feet west of 8tiwanda Aven ,his project was previously reviewed by 'the��>r}i s Committeel on e January 16, 1991. At thts meeting, the Committee"did not ap prove the Equestrian Envelope Map' as presented. The Committee advised the applicant to revise the exhibit to address the following concerns: 1) The poteRtiai_._graded pad area for Lo �32 should not be long and narrow, but rather square in shape in order to better; accommodate a corral location in the rear yard further away fraro Colt Drive. Has been revised. 2) Lot 47 provides minimal area on wht'�'to site a corral. Street "C" should be pulled back to provid? a deeper back yard with more horsekeeping room. Street has not been relocated. 1% -% Lot 52 does not provide sufficient loom for a corral A smaller pad should be utilized on this lot. Has been revised,` 4) In addition, many of the restricted areas appear to have been omitted on the plan and should be .added for each lot. For instance, Lots 51, 52, 57 and 58 have not been drawn correctly. The applicant has revised tits .exhibit which will he presented to the Committee at the meeting. -.Staff Planner: Tom Grahn I tJ Action: The project was approved subject to the following conditions: v 1. The corral location for Lot 47 should be moved further to the south where additional space is available. 0 2. Revised equestrian envelope indicating all restricted areas should be resin, fitted for staff review prior to scheduling for Planning CortmisL' '�n. r ,J-3 z ; tt�(T a E z r 4 J. j„"�• \ ».1.. Rom. L-'• or .. OF RANCH CUCAMONGA ITEM: _ : PLAIVI�TNG} �.� VFSTON TITLE ,`q n � aN SCALE; EXHIBTI: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14120 ETIWANDA HEIGHTS C014PANS' June 26,-2991 � u2 Page 2 (c) The proposal to develop 68 single family lots on 53.5 acres of land is consistent with the Very Low Residential land use designation of the General plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the _specific findings;of' facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2rabove, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as. follows: (a) That tef(&atfvs tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of th8 tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (a) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed;. and � �r (D (d) The design of the subdivision is not ice? ly to cause substannial environmental damag< and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (a) The tentative tract is not likely co ';,ause Serious public health problems; and l Aft (f) The design c}f the tentative tjLact will not conflict with any easement acquirid by the }{ublic ati-large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within tha proposed subdivision. 4. Thir,,Commissi.oa hereby.linde and certifies that the project has been reviewed and, ­nstdsied in compliance with the California 3nvironmental Quality Act of I970 rnd, €urther, this Commission hereby Issues'a mitigated Negative Declaration =" 5. Sas,•d upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs'. 1, 2, 3, and 4 a ve, this Commission. Ierehy approve& the application subject to each and every, condition, set forth below and in the attached standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. planning Division 1) The block wall proposed along Vintage Drive and Summit Avenue shall be designed to be compatible with: Tract 13812 directly to the west. The wall shall includwr native atone pilasters with a_pre-cast concrete cap and a Split-face block i4ll with a split-face block cap. The mortar color shall match the block J color and shall be flush"WAIZ the block face. �r Pilasters shall be designed 24 inches square 4 ' A/,3 RESOVi ION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF, 'TF CITY OF S RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOri14120 AND RELATED .TREE REMOVAL, PERMIT;'91-21,'A RESIDENT$AL SUEDIVISION OF CBSINGLE FAMILY LOTS,GN 53.05 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND :SOUTH SIDES OF SUMMIT ANTNUE, 1,300 FEET WEST`OF`,'ITIWANDA AVENUE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UkTS PER ACRE), AND, MAMNG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225-111-22 AND 225-171-02, '08, 21,_ANV'16, i A. Recitals. (i) Etiwanda Heights Development Company has filed an application for the-approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14220 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 'r (ii) On the� 26th da-ct of June 1991, t)Se Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ,L_jucted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of'this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commiseion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Commission hereby specifically finds that 11 all of tho facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are trim round correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hoaxing on June 26, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: - - (a) The applicaY,an applies to property located on the north and south sides of Summit Avenue, 1,300,,f6)et west of £tiwanda Avenue; with a street frontage of 950 feet And a ,ot dspth of 610 feet on the north side of Summit Avenue and a street frontage of 659 feet and a lot'depri f 2,638 feet on the south side of Summit Avenue. (b) The property to the north is vacant, the property to the south is the freeway right-of-way, the property to the east cuntaine_'single family homes and) vacant property, and the'` property to tha west is vacant (Tract 13812 is located, directly ,tq the west :and LAE been-,.graded but construction of units has not yet bsjun}3 <; � i } ; ,3S ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLD'PION No. S 14120 - ETIWANDA EE:IGHTS COMPANy �X June 26, 1991 Page 4 5) Tree Removal Permit -No. 91-21 shall;be valid for a period of §0 days, subjact to extension' by'the Ci+y Planner. The 90 days• Fhall start i ing from the date: of issuance of r C:" ough grad is s A 7) New on-site windrow planting sha17, be provided at a rate Of SO lineal feet per`;acie. ' Based on a."`pr_ject of 53.05 acre of ;a minimum of a= �,653 lineal feet of on-site Eucalyptus windrow shall )�e provided. The location of required - on-site windrows shall,'be ,in accordance with % Exhibit ^F" of the .7un,a 26, 1991.Planning ComAiseion Staff Report. on-site windrow plantings shall consist of Eucalyptus maculates n )F_ in 5-gallon size planted 8 feet or center. ` I On-site win.;rows shall'' be 'shown . on the Landscape and Irrigation Plan and shall be \� subject to City Planner review and approval prior to building Permit issuance. ' New planting-shall be completed prior to occupancy. , f( ` 8) Care shall ,-�.�. exercised by all individuals, ,! developers, and contractors working near, pres. ra3 .trees so that no` damage occurs to such trees. In• accordance with Rancho Cucamange Municipal Code Section 19.08, all ' construction shall preserve and protect the health of; trees td�,Xsmain; and new trees planted to replace those removed t;J 1 9) Prior to accepting a de7osit on- tM-pr9P0 ty, the developer shall require each prospective buyer to sign a written notice .of any existing windrows or.trees required by these conditions to be preserved an place. SaiC.� disclosure shall be reviewad and approved' by-the° City Planner prior to re:':ordation. 10) NO .construction, �1including utilities, /thaf('f disrupts the root system shall be_pern!,tted. As a guideline,_ no trenching, or 'ether construction activity should occur;; within ' 15 feet of the tree trunk. ? 11) The applicant_'; shall follow aVI of the arboristla recommendations regarding - presez.ati6n, including but not limited to, monthly watering. `� ,} PL7a2hTNG COMMISSION-RESO IITZOfiT NO. J f Jy t TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS CGHPANY r June.26,, 1991 t, Page 3r' - 1'and shall be spaced a maximum of 40 feat an center. The wall shall be provided on both sides of Sumalit Avenue and; both sides of Vintage Drive. .The'`design of,the wail shall be 1 " shown on the Landscape and Irrigation Plan and shall be subject`to City planner review and �( approval prior`to-issuance of,building,,'`termite 2) Material samples t'or the block wall. ,shall be submitte,c for City Planner review amd approval prior to the issuance of l ilding permits. 3) A sound attenuation wall,, as xeriuired by the acoustical analysis shall be ifistalled along the south tract boundary and sh,�ihl•be designed consthtent witFiJfif• • sound attenuation wall to �r be provided wit: Tract 13812.._sThe final design, and location of the wall shall be subject to Desigh Review Committee reviews and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 4) A final acoustical"analysis, ahall be required .r to identity necessary mitigation m�iasures to reduce noise levels within the residence's below' Adak 45 CNEL. The report shall ba, subject to City Planner review and approval prior: to the issuance of building permits,N t; 5), Tree `Removal 'SPermit 'WO. 91-21 is hereby approved for - the removal of all trees, including stumps, son"ihoe project site except for 'those trees.described-beloFis ^=see in Tract Arbori;st Rerort Lot A2 A16 �l 52, 821 49 ,., 878 51 C32, C34, C60 43-:' c51 63 D5 39 D7, D8 38 via 36 E3 68 _ F30" 23 �4 F32 24:f, r33f 25 _4 G101 ! 21 t 0202, G1041 01061 27 Z 0207 .28 „ - i jv i . Y PLANNING COMMISSION.-�MSOL6110N NO. TT 14120 ETIWANDA HEI:3HTS COMPANY June 26, J1991 AA Page 6 -,J ject to a reirhursement ic,�rovementa ? agreement to,,,-- -istablishad upon completion of 1 *� -'improvement's. Therefore,` thy;" following. shall apple::' a) A written release shall be obtained from -; Watt Inland Empire ,indicating"that ,all "} jeeveloper-to-developer reimbursement obligations have been mot prior i:o FinaMap-� approval or issuance l permits, whichever occurs first, and permits, � y b) The developer, shall' duplicate the bonding for Summit .Svenue, with the addition o, parkway imp'ovements across the project frontage; andy,y i ^,) Summit AS,enue shall be,constructed to tLe satisfaction of the_City Engineer prior to the release, of any project occupancies; and d) if this developer ccmpyi,_`,-as J the improvements of Summit >Ayenue, he- rday recrIest a reimbursement agreement from adjacent development:. 3) Construct sufficient portions of the 'approved atrest system within Tract 13812' to;psovide two means of access to all portions of the tentative tract, including but' not limited to, "Colt Drive, Golden Traile Avenue,11 vintage Drive, Shaw Horse Way,,,, Rodeo Drivel' and the temporary access across the'Routc "30 Freeway right-of-way stseete shall:be constructed full width'. including r,,rest lights. off-site parkway improvementtx may be deferred until J devzlopmencs of thg adjacent property. The developer may requ`st is reimbursement •agreement =' from future development for. all ':off-site improvements. 4) Bluegrass (Hanle,) Agenue and "F" Street shall be constructed fluIll width, including street lights. Bluegrass, shall be constructed to collector street standards (44 feet wide)' Off-site parkway,idiprovements. may be de�eared --until development, (redevelopment) of the adjacent properties.. The, developer may request reimbursement agreements, from future development, for improvements on,the Off-site side of the respective centerlines. ti' I IV y�o PLANNING COMMISS,:ON RESOLLfTI02d NO, TT 14120 — ETIWA2`)DA HEIGHTS COMPANY June 26,,_1991 Page 5 , 1 " 12) ,;)se; two north/south Local Fes"ier, trails south otE ':'Summit Avenue shall be connected to the un*, Trail along Summit Avenue per City S a�adard�Brawing.No. 1007. ,1 :=Y 13) Trail fencing shall nct be installed at the outi1ide portion of trails abutting existing or ; propttaer�d trails in order. ',to prevent "split trailo,^ such as along the =westerly trail bourdtarv, 14) Local t`\kesder, trails shall ber, left open at connec{dons with streets and constructed with jl drive rcaches for equestrian service access''. 15) Houses all be setback a minimum distance of h. ,• 10 feet from trails accurring,at side yards.;; t,, 16) ,All Commu11`fty and,Local Feeder trails shall be constructs concurrently with the 7 street improvement e 1' Heavy brooM\�irilz�h concrete crossings shall bet t provided where trails cross public ,streets. The crossinyw shall be shown on the street xm rovament p p Mane .and shall be :approved by the , City Enginee, .and Cit Planner pr1or to I approval of th®,A F:;nal Map. Enaineerina Division't / S} The existi4' overhead utilities (telecomamunicatici\s and electrical) on the .project aide of�`Highland Avenue shall be underyrounded .from\,the first pole off-site east Of the east proiect boundary to the first pole of€site west of the west project boundary. The developer may1irequeat a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half of the City adapted cost for un�orgrounding from future redevelopment, as it oc}`u=8 on the opposite side of Highland Avenue. 2) Summit Avenue shall bell�construoted full width, including ;street lights"but excluding off-site parkway improvements, from the intersection with Bluegrads (Hanley) Avenue,easterly-,to,the- Intersection %41th Etiwanda Avenue with•Phase S development: The developer of Tract 13812 is preparing to construct ) ,these street rim i PLAWtNG COMMISSION RESOLUTION Ii&. TT lt,120 ETIt9ANDA HEIGHTS COMPAI JtMe 26, 1991 page' '111 T,he a"A�� �awhall }ae appro{ea by,, �2 j 6altr�ans l'rtor .o`62]nL=Han a nal f ; � :oP ' U '�Bp C cva r', 3 r�e»uaed,itii wtdl:h,, �bve 5a through bS t she b� 1engthened by t:�ne �etm��a aa�ount':, gaeamits� fog t'"lrois °55-&8 shall lJkt withheld .until such (time as a final, 1` dutwinuivim ion is made b ( 1; t- Y# `al raps for the north' 1' or`1�pertyYno of 'the re ftight 1 ,L ,y. 3 6 , the Sec-Otary�tq this Commission shall certify to the adepti,9n,` of this,Resalitton. APPRovrD AND;ADOPTED THIS 26TH'DAY,OF DUNE 1991. PUNNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TONCHO CUCAH&MA r BY � Isrry T. McNlc�l, Chairman . ATTf''bT,� i t, 'Brad Buller, Secretary', I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning -Commission of the City of Rancho ` Cucamonga, do hereby rcartify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the'''Plannng Commission .of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at,,, regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 1991i by the'following vote.-to-wit: C44.- AYES COMMISSIONERS: , NOES." COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMHISSIOYERS:_r,' ti.f f YI PLAW;YNG COMMISSION RESOIUTlC1N td0. TT 14:'c20 - ETIWANDA"IMIGI3TS-C4MPANy June 26, 199Y' Page`7 Aft c) An, easement for'.F],uegraee Avenue' over the I Metropolitan Water ^istrict-;(Im )' fee pro ert shall be obtained prier'tot€lnsi Map approval t f' or issuance .^f building permits, whichever occurs first. The MWD fee 'propeAy shall be"), identified to their satisfactiom ` '`he rrinal'' Flap and the improvement plans shall conform to HY7D ,guidelines.. 6 Construct n .act Orton ,e ,p of thel�Etiwan�ia Master.Plan S`stem 5 :St St orm rm Drains:!;located in St�pmit and _ Etiwanda:Avenues and install concrete lining in the existing dirt channel 'north of gighland: Avenue,; as 34etified by -the final drainage study and,, approved by the City Engineer.. Applicable standard drainage,;fees for ports n9 Ii of the site within; Area 5 _shall be credited to the cost of the facility 'and the eveloper shall be eligible for reimburs} _t.of costa in i excess o_ t:a fees in socort.ldlce with City policy. 7) Provide sufficient catch basins at the sump in- summit ,;'Avenue, near the "F" Sy set intersection, ,to minimize the possibility of overfloi: tJduo to ,catch basin blockage, or relocate "the sump, to the eatisfac`ion of the City Engineer. 8) A11 'local trail`crOseings of collector streets shall occur .^ intersections, as €ollowli a) On Summit Avenue,. trail crossings shall occur`-at.,the intersectior-s on the south side,.only, aligned with br@",aks in the Community Trail; and b) On Vintage'Drive, the only crassi�g.ehall occur at the inedrsectiontWith ^B�=Street. 9) Provide ;special coverings (bolted on'neoprene, plywood,- etc.) for all storm drain manholes :ct. located in local trails, as approved by the 1.5� City Engineer and Trails Committee. , t 10) A certificate shalt be;placed 'on the FinaL`Map indicating that,Lots 5, 6, 15, and 16_jjhall remain undeveloped until such time as the desilting facilities for Streets "G", e,and are no longer required, to the satisfaction:of the City Engineer. Al, At n, Prim No.C��-drSJ This condition shall ,�walvod if the Cfiy receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered Into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school Impacts as a result of this project, r !� 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or priorto issuance of building permits when no map involved,wrttencertii iMlonfromtheaffectedwj`derdistrictthatadequatesewerandwater facilities are or wile be available to serve the f:roposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development.Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision orpriorto Issuance of permits in the case of all other rasidentiai projects, i3.Site Development 1. .The site shall be developed and maintained in acaardance with the approved plans which ,—J—J— include sit4 plans,architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,fandscaVng,sign Progzam, and graving on file in the P nning islon,th h conditions'contained ail, Development Code regulations,and Specific Plan..e6et► plaaabtY. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being,commenced thereon, all Cowitions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. — 3. Ocrupancyof Me facility shall not commence until su,Ch time as all Uniform Building Code and Stabs Fire Marshall's regulations have been compiled with.Prior to G=pancy,,plans shalt be submtted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. Ash 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions o;Approval shall be _/^/— submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. S. All site,grading,landscape,Iftation,acdstreetimprovemeMplansshWIbecoordi,ntedfor —J—.-J— consistencypriortoissuanceofanypermits(such as grading,tree removal,enproachment, building,etc.),or prior to IM map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or sr.proved use has commenced,whichever c ommoss first e 6. Approval of this request Fhacii not waive comprw=with all sections of the Development Code.ail either applicable City Ordinances,and applicable Car%- rutty Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building permit issuance, 7. A detailed on-site lighting plant shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and _J--J— Sheriff's Ckoartment(989.6611)prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style,illumination,location,helq'i t,and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. if no centralized trash receptacles are provided,all trash pick-up shall be for Individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view, 9. Trash receptacle(s)are required and shall meet City stiindards. The final design,focativris, —J--J and the number of trash receplacleu shall be subject:to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits,. r 10.All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as translorm4rs,AC condensers,etc.,shall --J— qW be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of acombination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 00w alp DEPARTMENT OF` ara0ac�00�0oao�A��i���' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT S N U u r a"TA a 0 mink 0 *j D"IT100%-NL PROJECT#: IeAkAn SUBJECT: APPLICANT: l/e � G LOCATION: Those Items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTKE PLANNING DiVISION, (714)989.1861, FOR COMPLIFNCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Llrttlta 1. Approval shall expire,unless extended by the Planning Commission,H twiiding permits are not issued or approved use has not commencedwiirt.,24 manthstmm the date ofapproval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approvRd qftrx 3. Approve of Tentative Tract.No. is granted subject to ftte approval of 4.i1heceveicpershalio'omtnence.pattkVatetn.wWconsur teorcausetobeoommenced. _1—.i— participated in,or consummated,a Mallo-Roos Community Facilities District(CFD)for the Rancho Guc,n.Tartga Fire Protection district to finance construction and/or maintenance of a Tire statiotio serve the development. The sr Ion shall be located,designed,and built to all specifications of the Ram tto Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdce,mid shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shag be selected by the District in accordance with ifs needs. In any building of a station,the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations.The CFD shalt be formed bythe 019M andthe developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. Prior to recordation of the final rW or the Issuance of building permits, whichever comes igrsl,the appiicant shall consent to, or participate In.the establishment of a Mello-Roos ?. Oimrrvnity Facilities D6-tricf for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However,if any school district has previously establiehert such a Community Facilities District,the applicant shall, In the ahe native,consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permLS,whichever comes first.Further,tf the affected school district has not formed a Mallo-Rocs Comm unhy Facflitles District withintweive months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project,thins condition shall be deemed null and void. SC-2/91 C. l of 12 T7 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners,Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval priorto issuance of building permits. 4. Al'i'mof appurtenances,including airconditfoners and other roof mounted equiprmnt and/or ,_f .J preiections,shall be shielded frorriviewandthe sound butleredtrum adkent properties and str6ats as required by the Planning Division.Such screening shall be architecturally intesvrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. _, !( Dalai,%shalt be included in building plans. -�D. Parking and Vehicular Access(indicate details an buRding plans) v 1. All par' %ig lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimen,ronof 6 feet and shall —j,_ contain q ar-tech walk adjacent to the Barking stall(including curb)� 2. Textured WMrian pathways and textured pavement,across cirtulatior aisles shall be —J--1 providedthrroughoutthedeveioprnenttoconnsctd►vetifngs/ianifaJt fldingsvvdhopynspaces/ 1 plaaastreemationat uses. 3. All parking sg,�aces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances,aNk exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers it driveways are less than 98 teat in depth from back of sidewalk 5. The Covenants, CkWitions and Restrictions shall reshietthe storage cf!ecreatbnalvehicles ss --r--� on this site unle Mel,are the p0mipal source of tran.,portatan for the owner and prohibit parking on interior e=ulaflon aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. fa. Plans for any se4 ;;sates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer,and —/—J Rancho Cucamo,V�, fise Protection DistdCtrevlewandapprovalpriorttaissuw=ofbuilding permits. E. landscaping(far publicly mainta"nod gandecap grace,refer to Soction H.) 1. A detailed landscape and ItiVatkan Plan,incWngslcpapianft and model Imme Itinoscap ing ir,the case of residenaai developmetx, shaft be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for C,�V Planner review and aMoval pft, ftissaancoofbuifding permits or prior final crap ap xoval In the case of a custom kit subdivision. 2. Existing trees requiredto be preserved&a place strap be protected with a eonstnr eYon barrier _i—.1 inacwrdancevriththe MunicIpal Code Section 19.08.110.and so rioted onthe grading plar s The location of those trees to be preserved In place and r:awWatlbnS fortmnsplantedi shall be shown on the detailed larWwipeplafts.The OWIearx shall followaltof,hsarborr,,s reoommandatarts regarding preservation,transplanting and trimming Methods. 3. Aminimumof tfees psrgrossacre,coff:plsedofthefoibwri Vsizes,shallbeprovided within the pmJecf: %-46.hrchboxorlarger, c' %-36-inch box orlarger, %-24-inch box or larger,,°`%,15-gallon,and %-5 gallon. 4. A minirrsum of ' of trees project shall be "+ PkM,9d winlin the specimen size trees 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gal5on tree for every three --j _ _ Parking staffs,su1111166rlt to shade 500/6 of the parking area at solar noon on August21. i SC 2l41 4of12 � f . ti2.0 Carob r 11.Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordame with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to �J approval of the final map. 12.All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13.A detailed plan indicating trail widths,maximum slopes,physical conditions,fencing,and weed,controi,in accordance wOl-.-City Master Trail drawings,shall be submitted for CRY Plannerreview and approval pr'arto approval and recordationof the FinafTract Map and prior r to approval of street improve{,+ent and grading plans.Developershail upgrade and construct all trails,Including fencinp and drainage devices,in conjunction with street improvements:' 14.The Covenants,Condiaraand Restrictions(CC&Rs)shatlnotpmhibitthekeepingofequine animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met.individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals Without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners'associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 1 S.The Covenants,Conditions,and.Restrictions CC&Rs' and Articles of 1( 1 ncorporation of the Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney.They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits,whichever oars first.A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16.Aliparkways,open areas,and landscapingshall be permanently maintained bythaproperty ._JJ_ owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable,to the City. Proof of ttis landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17.Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or JJ_- dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system.The easements may be contaiDad in a Deolaratior of Restrictions for the subdivision which shalt be recordfd concurrently wlth the recordation of the final mapor issuance of permits,whichever comes first.The easements shall prohibit the casting of ; shadows by vegetation,structures,fixtures or other object,excew for WRY wires and similar objects,pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-z. 18.The project contains a designated Historicai Landmark. Tbe itdfw shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the Historic landmark A1er,.y r Permit No. .Any further moditioations to the site incitylirig,but W F mited to,exterior alterations and/or interior aiteratbnswhich atfoct+he exteriorof the buildirrzorStructures.removal of landmark trees,demolition,relocation,reconstruction of buildings orstructures,orchanges to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Aileration Permit subject:to Historc Preservation Commis sk:t review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An aRemativa energy system is required to provide domestic k `q forall dwelling units —./_I— a nd for heating any swrmrrt, l or aoa ng 1� unless ether alterhas,-4nergy systems are demonstrated to be of iival6rt y eqr capacityandeffirJeney.All at the time of Initial deveicpment shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shah have the front,side and rear elevations upgrade,with architectural —/—l_ treatment,detailing and Increased delinealL-,of r'mfare treatment sublid to.City Planner review aryl approval prior to issuance of building permits. SC-2/91 3 of 12 i(its F.Signs S�suaisria oo�: 1. The signs Indicatedon the submitted plans are conceptual only and not apart of thisapproval. Any signs proposed for this develupment shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application anti approval by the Planning Division pr orto installation of any signs. r 2. A Uniform Sign Program;orthi5development shall be submitted fol4itv Planner reviewand approval priorto issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s)shall be provided for apartment,condominium,or townhomes .J._/ Prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.Environmental _1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock ,_/`/,� Crusher project in standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit or any property. 2. The devek Jr shall provide each prospective buyer writfdn notice of the City Adopted J— Special S .dies Zone for the tied Hill Fault, In astandard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each Prospective buyer written notice of the foothill Freeway project in a standard fcmiat as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the ._/_ ! Issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL,the building materials and construotiontechniquesprovided, and if appropriate,verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures.The building plans will be checked for conformance with the rt Wga ion ma7ssures contained in the final report, H.Other Agencles 1. EmergencysecondaryasxessshallbrsprovidedinacamndancewfthRanchoCucarmiurigaFire --J—J Protection District Standards. 2. Emergency a=ss shall beprovided,matgtenance free and ctoar,a Minimum of26feetwide -.t---J_ at all times during constrix3lon in axohdanoa with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District recAlrermints. 3. Prior to h-=Jaws of building permits for coMbub'ttbia constructio,j, evidence shalt Le, -/01 submittedto the Rancho Cucamonga-ire PnoteWon Distrietthat temporary water supply for fire protection is dvaflsble,pending comphetion of rEquired tire protec4ign aystem. .� 4. The appligirt sh 10 cc-4act_the U.S,Postal Ssrvlue to determine the appmrAata type and -J—/ iodation of mail boxes.MAI-famfiy residential dsvelopriwnts sh311 provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lightitV.The Mal tocatlonof the mall boxes and the design of the oft-read SInxhire shall be subject to Ch)f Planner revalw and approval prior to the issuance of'buifdinD permits. ✓� 5. For prole is using Septic talik facilities,written certification of acceptabil'riy,including all -leJ suppor2;ve information,shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County bepadment of Environmental Heath and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tanis Fermmhs,and prim to�,mua;r.a of buitdfng pem7 ft. ' sc-2/91 /U LIP 6 or 12 i _ 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one'I' tree per30 linear feet of,building. ` 7. All Privsta Mope barks 5 feet or less-in vertical height arid ofSorgreaterslope,butlessthan a 2:1 slope,shail.ha,at minimum,i pedwith !�� irrigated and landsca appropriate ground�verfor erosion control. Slope planting required byliis section shall include a pernuislent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. AliprivatesfopasinezcessofS feet,but less than a feet inverticalheight and of2:lorgreater —1—!1 Q slope shallbeLMscapedandirrigatedforerosioncontrola;.Atosoftentlt-.irappearanceas 'I follows:one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each ISO sq.ft.of slope area,1-gallon or larger size shrub pereach 100 sq.f.of,lope area,and appropriate ground cover.to addition,sb13 banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 orgreatersiope shall also include cn;p I' 5-gallon or larger size free per each 250`sq.ft.of slope area.Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften aril vary slope plane,Slope planting.equired by thi`,' section shaG include a permanent Irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single Cnity residential development.all s P k>pephanting and Irrigation shall be continu- _/_/ '_ ously maintained in a heafthyacd thriving condition by the developer until each individuaiunit is sold and occupied by the buyer.Prior to releasing occupancyforftse units,aninspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 10.For muhl-family residential and non-residential development,property Owners are,respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscapedf areas on-site,as Well a:,001* �"us planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained In a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trhminr-'y. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plan material shall be replaced whNn 30 days from the date of damage,. 11.F nt ya lands tng shall be required per th3 Development.Code and/or Thin requirement shall be In addition to the required J� stre t trees and s planting. ti f 12.The final design of the Perimeter rkwa s-walls la included in the required 1 Y landscaping,to,City Planner shall be tr equ andscspe pla�.s arlp shag be aubjsctto City Planner review and approval and coordinated forconsistencywfthanypaft-ay landscapingplanwhichr gybe requim+d by the Engineering Division. 13.Special landscape features such as mounding,alluvial rock,specimen size trees,meander- s idowaks(with horizontal change),and irleenshlied landscaping,is required along _ r 14.Landscaping and irrigation systerm required to be Installed wW,,In the Pub4c fight-of-way on the perimeter of this project area$(,all be continuously makntalned by the developer. __e—" 15.All walls sh all be provided with dec orative treatment.if locate d ln,p k cmatntenanceareas, the design shall be cootdinated with the Engineering DWIon. 16.Tree maintenance criteria shalt be devsfaped and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permils. These crkeda shall encourage the natural growth characteristics Oahe selezted tree species. 17,Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the,0ancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SC-2/91 5of12 �!q7 OIZO 6. As a custom-lot suudivision,the following requirements shall be met: ANIL a.Surety shall be posted and an agree ment executed guaranteeing completionof all on-site --� <— drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto final rq;gip approval and phorto the issuance of gradim,permits. b.Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are 000ducted onto J J_ or over adjacent parcels,are to be delineated-,and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to Issuance of grading and building permits. c.On-sits drainage improvements,necessary for dawatering and protecting the subdivided __J__J— F:openies,are to be installed prior to issuance of;wilding permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving,or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be subm t1ted'to the Building and Safety __J._!_ Division for approval prior to issuance of building arx grading permits.(This may be on an fincremental or composite basis.) I: e.All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertk al height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover for erosion co gtrcl upon Completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion corriml shall becompisted to the satisfaction of the Building Official.in addition a permanent irrigation system Shan be pmvidad. This requirement does not releaa-,the applicanttdevebper from compNanea with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.0401 of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL.CONTACT THE Ei<GINSERiNG DNISION, (714)SSp-181f2,FOR COMPLIANCE WiTH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L.Dedication and Vehicular Acesse y. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the Ctty for all interior public streets, community trails.public paseos,public Isr:iscape areas,street trees,and public drainage facilities as shown en the plans and/or tentative Mp. Private eassma as for non-public facilities moss-lot drainage,local feeder traits,etc.)shad be raserved as shown an the plans •/ and/or tents;:'-a map. Y 2. Dedication;shall be made of the following rights-of way on the perimeter strVAts (measured from Street centerline): 315 total feet on !�14.►ys AWN,Aide, 33 total feet an a�,ts�e, L¢,L d► St�P 3 total feet on ra' ccarg� ,i, total fast on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for —•toot Wide roadway eas4MGr1t shall be made _.J� for all private Streets'or drives. 4. Non•vehicular�7x=Ss shall t!e dedicateJ to the City for the follW:rirg streets S. Ret",,Irocal acmes Casements shall be provided ensuring amass to all paresis by CC&Rs or by`o !ads and sha�4 be recorded con currently with the rnap or prior to the issuance of twtkiing'�ernris.where no map is involved. �i! 2:'?t �1 Anri2 t/ APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISIOIs (714)989-1863, FAR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: )5 1.SRO Development r I.The appii=rd shall conplywith the latest adopted Uniform Buildi,,g Code.Uniform Mechani Jam_ cal Code,UnNcrm Plumbing Code,National Electric Code,and all other applicable codes, ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative Permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building pem*s fora now residential dwelling unit(s)or majer addition __-_J to existing unN(s),the applicant shall paydevelopmenifees at the established rate.Suchfees may include,butare not limitedto:City3eatAiiicatbon Fee,Park Fee,Drainage Fee,Systems Development Fee,Permit and Plan Cnecking Fees,and School Fees. 3. Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new COmmeitial or industrial development or addition!o an existing development.the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate.Such fees may include,but are not limited to:Systems Development Fee, Drainage fee,School Fees,Permit end Plan Checking Fees. f 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Buil ingOfficial,aftert^actlpar•:slmaprecordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J.Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform L;'idirg Corte for the prcpeerty fine clearances considering use,area,and fire-resistiveness of exist.'rg buildings. 0- 2. Existing buildings snail be rrede to c0r( rywith coned building and zoning regu;ations for .1_1_ the Intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3, Existing sewage disposal facilities shaf be removed.11 2ndlorcapped to coompi,vilth the _l_J— Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Buitdbng Code. - 4. Underground on-3 to utilft&are to be located and shown on buiSddng plans submitted for _/_J baiidirg permit appocation. j K.Grading f 1. Grading of the subject propertyslait be In a0wWancewith the Unikrm Bulyd ng Code,City —1---J—. Grading Standards,and accepted grading i ractlmi .The final grad g plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading Man. .� 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed bythe-State of California to r—_J_ perform such work 3. The development Is located within the so7 erosion%eonirol boundaries,a SON Disturbance J Permit is required.Please coract San Bernardino CouMyDeaafimerttofAgricultureet(714) 387-2111 for permit applicatrn.Doarmematinof such perrls shaG be submitted to to a City prior to the issuance of rough grading perms f 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualgted'dri&eer or geologist and the time Of application for grading plan check. .� S. The final grading plans shall be completed arW approved prortoissum=ofbulMirgOerrnitt .__!J— SC-2/91 7 Of 12 Notes: (a)Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on metj:r: MI Pavement t reconstruction and overlay's will be determined during plsn check. (c)If so marked,side- walk shall be cur,l:near per S1 C,304. (d)If so marker,anin•lieu of construction tee shall be provided for this item. 4. fr iprovement plans and consMction: a. $,weet improvement plans including seat trees and street lights,prepared by aregis- tered Civil Engineer,shall be sum mated fo'il-nd aPPm vedby the City Engineer.Security shall be posted and an agreeciam exaczri iCto the satisfaction of the City Engineer and, the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of Yhe,,,ubk and/or prfvat6vreot Improve.- merits,priorto final map approval erthe issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way,ie�s shall be paid ar►d a i/--./____ constructioin •ermft shall be obtained from the City Engineer's offici.+,in addition to any _ other permits required. c. , Pavement striping,rnarking,rtr ffic,street n3metigning,and interconnectl6onduit sy Jam_ snap be installed to the satisf action of the City Engineer, d. Signal conduitiivithpuil boxes shall be installed on any new construction orreconstruction of major,secondary or coRr-11or streets which intersect with other major,secondary or collector streets tor future tr?.tlic signals.Peril boxes shall be—,placed on'ieth sides of the ,i, street at feet outside of BCR,ECR or any other locations appnved by tiie City Engineer. Notes: 4 w. _ Jr_/ AmIlk I (t)All pull boxes shall be No.6 unless otherwise spec'ifWdfy the City Engineer. (2)Conduh,shall be 34--h galvanized steal with ps lirope. e. Wheel chair tames shall bi,installed on ail faUr corners of intersections per City —'--1` Standards or directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roast regWring construction shall remains, vto traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction.A streetc"re pemt+t maybe required.A cash deposit shah be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving;�w Mch shall be �i refunded upon completion of the conctwilon to the satisfaction Of the City Engineer. g. Concentm, l drainage feo� shag;trot ci,ss sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains,shalae __f_ 1=`fl �- installed to vary Standards,except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp deaign shall be as specfflod-oy the City Engineer. i. Street twines shall be approved b;tta ir;ty PiAnner priorto vibmittal for first plan check. S.Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall bs provided for review and approval by the City Enginwr. Prior to any work being perforimled on the pi vats stre®ts; fees shall be,paid and imrt 6.6ion permits shall be obtained from the City Enginser's Off ice in addition to any other permits required. _ 6.Street trees,a minirnucn of it-galion size or larger,shall be installed per Cityr Standards in I _,1 r accordance wvtth the City's streei tree grog°am. SC'2/91 10of 12 I 6. Private drainage basements torwoss-lotdrainage shall oe provided and shall be oehneatec or noted on the final map. 7. The final map-shall clearly delineate a 10•ioot minimum building restriction area on the iv neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: 'Me hereby doafkate to thi9 City of Rancho Cucarnarga the right to prohibit the J constiucYai or(residaniQ)a<dldings(or other,structures)w khin!hose areas designa?ed- on the map as buk ing restri4'in areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from e&h lot tcrthe adjacent lot through Ili- 9, 8. All existing aasement3 lying within futuve rights-'of-wayshall'oe quitclaimed or delineated on] the final map. I y% 9. Easements for public sskfewaiks and/or street trees placed aAsidc the public right-ol-way j_/ — shall bie dedi-.ated to the City wherever they°'ancroach onto private property. Additional sireeVright-ot-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes,to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of ourbs.If curls mc-4jacent VOawalk is used along the right turn lane,a parallel street trae maintenance easermint shall be provided. 11.The developer shall make agoodfaithetforttoacquirethe required of she property interests _J�l necessary to construct the requires public irt:prov9ments,and if he/she shnuiq fail to do so, the developer shall,at Bast 120 days prior to submittal W the fins,map for approval,enter into an agreement t0 prMiete the lmrlrovements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such firnee as the Cityacqu',es the prrperty interests required forthe improm7lenits. Such agreement shall provide forpayment by,the developer of all costs in-4urred by the City to acquire the off-site propeRy interests requiredin:connectionwith the suddivision.Security for a:�bition of these costs shall begin the form of a cashdeposit in tha amount given in an appVisal report obtained by the developer,at developers rest.The appraiser stall have "approved-by the City prior to commencement of the awraisal. Street Improvem ws ` 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facili.levq,community trails,psseos, landscaped areas.etc.)shown on the plans and/or entat►ve map shall be oonstructed to' City Standards. interior street immvements shall include,flut are not limited"to,curb and gutter,AC pavement,drive approaches,stalks,street lights,and street trees. 2. A minimum W 2&loot wide pavement,within a 4Q-foot w;,%t tficated right-of•way shall be constructed for all half-sWion streets. !� 3. ;orlstW tite +avwiil jtorimeter greet Improvem3rtts inc iding,but not lirnh(id to: I STitEEr NAME CURB h A.C. S�E DRMS S1 zrr 3IRFEt CGMM.MEDIA !y GUTTER PVM V,ALlt APM IJ�at>fS TREF.�3 TRAIL ISLYs1D' GTifER r, 1 yMk±A4�4'L' ® � f+�'� e/ � ✓ ate, SC 2/9 t 9 of 12 !� i B.A permii from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its ngtr•of•way ;I S.TreAsare prohibited Within 5 feet of the outside diameter of an y�ubl�storm drain pipe r-easured from tre.outer Etlgeof a mature tree trunk. 6.Piblidstorm drain.Aasements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a �—�-- blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P.Utilities U/ 1.Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanitary sewerage system,water; gas,.slectric power,felepnons.and cable*t al.'�cderground)i;�,'accordancew;411 the Utility Standards.Easements shall be provided as requirZ f. � 2,P.:e developer shall be responsible for the relocation o.,texM,Ing utilittilas necessary. �—3.Water and sewer plans strait be designed`t lid construLted'to meet the rega 6merds of the .-..f_.f Cucamonga County Water District(CCWDj,Rwicho Cucamonga Fire ProtBR San District. and the-Environmental Health Department of the County'of Serf l3emaedine.matte f of corrpiiance from the CCWD is requlred prior to final,map approval or issuance or'perm as, whichever occurs'dirst. Q.Genera r Requirements anJ Approvals t 1 t,The separate parcelscontainedwithis the project boundaries shall be legally combined intu —�—� one parcel prior to issuance of buikfi tl permits. - 2.An easement for a'joint use cl&ewdy j�hail be provided prior to final map approval or ( issuance of building permits,whirheve`%occurs first,for., r t , 3.Prior to approval of the final.map a deposjt shall bs posted with.the City covering the esti nsted cost of apporioning the essrtterris under Asseozent District r among the nevrty created parcels: A- ®4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline,;Secondary Regional,and Master Plan /_1 Drainage Pees shall be paid prior to final reap approval orprlor to Building permit issuance it no map is involved Permits�shatt be obtained from the foi)owing agencies forwork within their right-of-way: s,A signed consent ano waiver form to join and/or form the Law inforoament Community r J Facilities Dlstft shall be filed With the Clty Enginear prior to final.map approval or the j issuance of building panfuls,whichever occurs first.Formation oostt rn a:shali be boe by the Devek)per:; t 7.Prior to finafs> tom.. `any development phase,sutf'lodent iriipiovement plans shall 6e com- _J—. ple'sd beyond the;M:ase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to l x the satisfaction of the City Engineer.Phase bdundaries:ahall corespond to lot lines shown on the apprpv'd tentattve reap. r ��l SC•218t 12of 12 (V �, 7.Intersection line oJsit^.designs sh2.l be reviewed by the City Engineer for Conformance w;tn'' adopted policy. a. On coilecor or farger streets,lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, —/—'— qW including driveways.Walls,signs,and slop43 shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the tines of sight snail be approved by the City Engineer, b. Local residential street Intersections shall have their noticeability improved,usually by movingthe2+1-closest street trees on each sK away from the street and placed inar}seet- tree easement. ?,-` a A ermit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: 9.All public Improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the Ssuance of'uuilding permits: N.Public Mainteilance Area 4' +.A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards —�—J— shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.The following landscape parkways, trails of 'her areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: ?.,A signed consent and wa5rer form to pin and/or form the appropriate landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filedwith,theCity Engineer prior tc+final map aporovator issuance ofbui!ding permits whichever occurs first.Formation costs shall be home by the developer. _ lie-3.All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 4.Parkway landscaping on th6followirig street(s)shall conform to the results of.the respective Beautification Master Plan: Q.Drainage and Flood CIrrtrot 1. The project(or portions thereof)is located within a Flood Hazard Zone:therefore,flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2.It shall be the developers responsibility Li have the current FIRM Zone designation rerpoved from the projtkt area. The developers engineer shall prepare all necessary reports,plans,and hydro"Whydraulir:.alculatons. A Conditional Letter o1 Map Revision(CLOMR)shall be obtained fro«n'FEMA prior to final map approval or l ; issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A Letter of Map Revision(Lt3MR)shall i be issued by FEW prior,o occupancy or irriprovemeM acceptance,whichever occurs first. 3.A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final —'—'— map approval or issuancy of building permits;whicheverocn.rs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. sc-2/91 " 1`Y11 of 12 /iV -S3 1 PLANNING C,)MMISSION STAkk REPORT CUP 91-22 - VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK June 26, 1991' lr Page 2 Aft E., Parking Calculations: o' Number of Number of Type �quare Parking Spaces Spaces 4 of Use Footage Ratio Regni:ed Provided Vineyard Nat'l 5.400 ' 1/250 22 20, Bank 2,700 1/1000 a. 3 .., Dee Dee's 2,700 1/1 faculty 1/ ? % - Dance St-idio 1/3 student r Jazzercise 3,15.0 8* l rE8 Auto Body Shop 13,500 1/400 34 A4 Auto Bumper Shop 2,700 1/4010 {' 7 y Garage Door Co. 2,700 1/500 : 5 7 Vacant 11,690 1/400 29 29 TOTALS 44,540 115 111*$ * Limited to a ;a'.;imum.of A people during normal business hours. �*Because of rounding off, the number of parking.soac�.s provid,,',d for tenant square footage exceeds existing .,parking by 'sine space` (112 versus 111 actua �_ II. ANALYSIS: A. reneL'11: Theiproposed use entails the lestablishment of 5,400,.square feet of office and 2,700 square feet cf warixio.; ,space within the Cucamonga Industrial Parks located_ at 9495 9th Street (see Exhibit. ..C.). The use involves a non-public office responsible for, bookkeeping and stora5e of bookkeeping materials. Staffing will consist of 3 proof operators, 5..clerks, r' computer operator, 1 manager, 1 assistant:manager, and jjwarehorze employee for a total of 12 staff members.. If '=Future volume of: material exceeds 'staff's ` capabilities, up to 2 additional employees may be added for a maximum of 14 employees as indicated by the applicant. Proposed hours of operation are 8.10 a:m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday thrq%jgh Friday. / B., Issues. The primary issues related t) locating this`.type of use within a, industrial park are zompatib,14 ty with surrounding uses and avail.Bil,lty of parking.,.. The following,sections addressand discuss these iaEses: \ 1. ".omeatibility.of Uses: Administrative an& office'-uses may be pernitted .within Subarea 3 subject to review and approval of.)a Conditional Use Permit,. The pro_aosed use ,is located within a partially occupied industrial park. ;, Five tenant use's-currently occupy tenant spaces 'including two dance studios, one auto body shop,- one auto bumper shop, and ` one garage door manufacturer. Because of the types of existing uses,, together „ with the"number oi employe 3 and noise typically,assoclu-cd with -CITY OF RANCHO-�C.-TjCAMONGA r` �j DATE: June 26, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission. FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom�Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-22 VINEYARD NATIONAL SANK The request to establish an administrative and office use in a leased space of 8,100 square feet within an existing industrial park in r the General Industrial District; (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at 9495 9th Street - APN: 209-032--24. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Nf'. A. Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use ^ermit for a bank's administrative office. B. Surrounding band Use and Zoning: � North Industrial buildirgs; General Industrial District (Subarea 3) South Vacant; GenerA ind;istrial'District (Subarea 3) East - Industrial buildings; General Industrial District (Subarea 3)111- West - Single family residences and citrus grove, General Industrial District (Subarea 3) C. .General Plan Designations: r Project.Site - General Industrial North General Industrial South - General Industrial' East - General Industrial Mast General Industrial r yr D. Site Characteristics: The use is located within an existing, fully-developed, tt lti-tenant industrial complex- The project site contains two buildings totaling 440540 equare` feet arui provides up to`20 tenant spaces and ]11 parking spaces. •- 0 C`FM:O „V PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-22 - VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK June 26, 1991 Page 4 C. Fire Districtll Comments: The Rancho Cucaionga Fire Protection' District conducted a plan check prior to submittal of the Conditional Use Permit _application (see., Exhibit "F",) and indicated that; Q � compliance with all Uniform Fire Code recp: rements will be required: l III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make,.the following t findings before approving.this applications ` A. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and. 'the, purposes of the Industy-al Area Specific Plan subarea in which the site is located; and B. That the proposeA use will not "re detrimental to the public health, safety, or welftire or materially injurious to properties, or improvements in the vicinity,, and C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item,has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin nes:>paper,, the property has been posted, and notices have been. sent to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends, approval of Conditional Use Permit 91-22 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Resp lly su tted„ J(, Brad u11 1 Citp Planner Q� i BB-TGJjfs At Attachments: Exhibit "A” - Letter from Applicant '! Exhibft "H" - Site Vt,il,ization Map Exhibit "C" Site Plan 'Exhibit "D' - Kevisei Site Platt f �r Exhibit "E" -'Floor, Plan E::hibit "F" - Fire District Comments-. Resolution of Approval 0 PLANNING COMESISSION STAFF REPbRT „1 CUP 91-22 - VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK' ' June 26, 1991 f 1)a e 3 the proposed administrative office use, staff believe the bawk office will not, create adverse impacts on surrounding �. uses•. if anything, . existing' usesmay' negatively i.mpaci the proposed office use with noise and .other 'operati,onal impacts. Nevertheless, ,to e4 ure control over land use compatibility, the Jtesolution of Approval conta.ns a condition stating, "If operation nlrL, the- facility: causes adverse-effectscon adjachnt businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit 'shall be brought before the planning Commissi'sn'�-Jfor consideration and possible termination of the use." z 2, Avail ny of Parking:- Tb,, proposed us�f'is located within a 44,540_square foot multi-tenant industrik,complex designed at a ratio of 1 parking space for each 400 square feet ofi,}iross rloor area, providing'a total,of 111 parking spaces:'' Based upon t'its design requiremenV,, the 8,100 squarv' .`feet of tenant space,,'aas 4y provided .a total of 20 parking spaces. The., proposed use involves 5,400 square feet of .office and 2,700 square feet of warehouse which will require a total of 1-25 parking spaces (1 parking space for each 250 square feet of office plus 1 parking space for each 1000 square fast of warehouse'). Although there is a discrepancy between parking spaces required and those provided, there are several factors to Abe considered which may reduce the potential for .parking, conflict. First, . there is the,, option of providing additional parking ,;spaces' within pro;jeci\boundaries. The parking spaces and loading'zdae areas on tyre East side of the tenant space (see Exhibit "C") could be revised to provide four additional parking spaces (see Exhibit "0"). This revision will provide. a 'total of 24 parking spaces „for the proposed use. With 24 parking spaces, a maximum of 24 employees may be allowed, whicit exceeds the 14 employees antiapated by the applicant. Secondly, two tenant uses currEntl^r' operating' within project bounlaries (Dee`Dee's Dance Studio and Jazzercise Dance Studio) could provide for a shared. parking as their uses ;;c:perate at predominantly late afternoon and evening hours. Dee Dee 0s Dance Studio offers weekday,dance classes from 3:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. and the Jazzercise Dance Studio offers classes from c::00 a.m.- to 10e30.,a.m. and from 4 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. As ti.�zse u54s do not operate'"continuously during normal business hou;Is, a shared parking concept may be j utilized. Finally, the parking requirement foi an`4fice,use is based;urou what is commonly needed for an 'office which it� open to the 'public,; providing parking spaces for both employees and office patrons,. This use, is different from typical offices in that stafiing sizes will le specifically limited to a maximum of 24 employees and the office :^11 not be o11 pen to the public. Therefore, becausa of increases--in the number of on-site parking,` spaces, shared parking, and limiting staff, sizes, staff does not ( anticipate a parking conflict., . v fJ Brad BullerN May 20, 1991 1 Page 2 i hope that the above answers your questions as to the number of employees, the:type of use`,iand .ire future intentions. "Thanks you"for your help and cooperation in this matte.' ,Vineyard National Bank - Donald M. Cas l,'O t Executive Vice President DMG/sc AML c - f r J{ f! AML C4 `' OMIORS] it May 20, 1991 ti �r Planning Department s; City of Rancho Cucamonga P. fir. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ATTN: Brad Buller City Planner RR: Vineyard National Bank Conditional Use Permit for 9495 9tuI street, Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr. Buller: At the request of your Department, this latter will set , forth the intendeduse, number of employees and other pe�itinent facts concerning the Bank' s usage of the above property under th'e Conditional Use Permit requested. The use will be non-public .in that;no customer's of 'the Bank nor other 'tl members of the general public will be sOnt to this'I!3citi,on. The staff � use of the location will be bookkeeping for two thiids",of the area and storage of bookkeeping materials for one third of the area. The bookkeeping purposes will include procesving checks and ,computer. entry as well as making sp'ztatements for customers. This.sectiou_.wov-,.a involve three proof operators, five clerks, one cowt"Iter operator and a Manager and Assistant Hanager. f 1 The warehouse use will bey~strictly the storage of bookkeeping matelmela. and supplies for the various branch offices. There would only be one person working in the warehouse area.' I would imagine that if in the future the volume of materials increased we might consider adding one or two newemployees b?4t we have no present plans to do this. The hours of operation will be 8.30 a.m. to 5:30 p-rq., Mnday,througtA Friday. AtAninistrat:9on Office r 9590 Foothill Boulevard•F.O.Box 727•Rancho Cucamonga,GaitfQrnia91730•(?L4)9ti; n ONIN �# f. t PINS for) rz `. 0 JGlJ�ir► _ d�►?�4i� r - - 1 ,- r I 'I ti"iy Z r CITYR�i:`�1 OF 6kb ;OUCAMONGA PLAi`IMN r 62c ISION f� �j t 1 �t !3 ►Ii J r r. ir ON 44 I+XHIBCT: I` SCALE: �[ 0 _7 A{ YL 1 J Q UO ti 4, �r q F p�f ell- --RANCHOS CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION.;DISTRICT MESMIORACQDUM TOM GRAHN, PLANNINd , 1` FROM: SUSAN. WOLFE, FIRE ,11 ' SUBJECT:, VINEYARP NATIONAL BAND, CUP 9I-22 DATE: JUNE 12, 199.1 f CO After reOewing. the* ,~ttached; plan;` I',.see "no problem 'with j the prop�"(f, Use of the building''`as- aw', office.,{ . 'Based on the floor plan,'--It As note a public "Us.sembly The tenant improvement plans will have to thronh �lur l ` plan checker for, review. We need m,M a information on .,-,,the proe6sses/operations in � the "auto bumper shop" ; to the north. What is. the occupancy classification, 'a Jfy//.1 e ` �s � � v a � _ P''ANNING COMMISSION•RESOLUTION NO.'. .' iP 91-22 - VINEYARD NATIONt1L BANK. ;` U tone 26, 1991 j# ' M$age 2: 3. Based Upon1tho substantial evidencefprosentedi 'o this `Commission during. the"abovd:'rafarencea public hearing and"'upon the'6pecific.. 3ndinga cis?•,.' facts eat £orthi3r'paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this commission fie:^eby<.findti and concludes as<follows ta) That_the proposed use is iniaccord with the General Plan, the objeptiveo of the Development Cade, a.nd :.he purj o J, of t.tts di trirt An whichth'=` site is located. ]} 14 (b) hat, t%(a proposed use," togetheL, with the conditions applicable thg Piro,-will jnot be dlstrimantal• to the_pudic health,. s afetyr or ,,welfare 01 makter+golly inl'u40us to proaertie.,or i,mprava..nents in the vicinity. (c) Th t/the'proposed use complies, with each.+ of tb2,4 pli.aable provasions of the Wei", s opmant Cade. 4. Sssed upon the findings .and conclusions eei for.. agraphe 1, 2, and 3 obese, this Commission hereby approvez-.d;hg'application subtect tc, ' each and every condition set forth,below.. 1) ijApprovals, of this request" shad not wai^e 1 compliance with tttg indurtr�_41 A.pa Specific' jl Plan andall.applic� ls'Citp ArdlnanRcs. %) If operation of the facility --Lauees adverse �t effects upon adJ' i6ont busino des or operations,. �t p i, the Conditional Use Permit wail be brought is before the Planning Commission for consideration and _oossible termination of tha use! La 3) Occupancy of the facility shall not comasnce until such, time as all 'Uniform ,Bu :?jng ,,Cade if and Uniform.Pike Code raTulations have been complied'with. ''prior to occupancy, ,plan a ehall be submitted -to that,,.--Rancho Gucapunga Fire t, t Protection Dist ani3=the Building,and Safety- Division to show jcortpllance. The ,building ohall be snr3pecte3 `i or compliancePrior to J occ4ancy. 4) Any sign pr�,�Iosed for the facility shall be designed''in copifopuance with :than comprehensive Sign ordinance.,and any Uniform sign Progrnm jror the complex "ane shall requires renietir and:,, aFpraval;:lay tha` Planning:_Division prior to initallatioi►. ` 'S 5) Tess use, shall be limited to'"a masdmua-��of U i\ u RESOLUTION NO. AAk 6 'A RESOLUTICN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'OF'THE CITli OF RANCHO CUCWMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AP9ROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERiIT NO. 91-22, THE REQUEST TO ES.CABLISH Ati _ ADMINISTRATIVE AND nFFICE USE IN A LEASEDE OF`8i130 " SQUARE"FEET:WITHIN`' SN 17XISTING MULTI-TENANT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX LOCATED AT 9495 9TH STREET .ILL THE GENERAL" INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AhD MAKING FINDINGS Idd'SUPPORT' THEREOF APN:` 209-032-24, A. Recitals,. (i) Vineyard.,National Sank has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No 91=22 as,; described ,in the title of this. Resolution. Hereinafter in this 'Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request/ is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th�da4 of June 2991, the Planning Commission of the;, City of Rancho' Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed gr;blic iiearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites pr:,,ortto the adoption of this Resolution i have occurred. j B. Resolution. 3 NOW, THEREFORE,'-It is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plrmailg 'Commission'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ate;'follow`':,- 1. Tfi3s commission 'hereby'apecifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution ars.true aiid correct. 2. Based upon, substantial evidence presented to this Commission. during the above-referenced public hearing on C�ine;,26,_1,991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby ; specifically finds asfollows:'' (a) The application applies to property'located at 9495 9th. Str(..1t with a street frontage of 375 feet and let depth of 2qP feet and is presently improved with two industrial buildings aolaling 44,540 square feet` and 111 parking Bpacesyan3 (b) The "property to tha.r'`rth and east of the subject site contains industrial buildir•9 s a she property to the sooty, is vacant,�;snd the. property to the west Contains a sih4*P family residence; and (c) The application ,Proposes , the establAshment of Wn administrative and office u" with a aximus of, 14 employees and hours og r operation from„8:30 a.m. to 5:30 ( p.m., licnday""through Priday. r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION,NO. . CUP 91-22 VINE ARD NATIONAL,ANK Y fi June 26,- 1992 �i \1 Page 3 ' 6) The parkizig lot 'shall ba re-striped �a provide ;spur iiddition�l pk'°kxng,Space's (see-Exhibit"*D of- the Jute 261 1991 `Staff Riep'orts-4 Upon - termination of the use, the"' site shall be restored` to 3tA esistizig condition whjZjo =y1` urovilas three parkil,g.eptcas and three loa^lin 4 zones. 6. The .Secretary to thiw Commission shall certify to the adoption' of this Resolution. APPROVED AND :UPPTED THIS,2M DAYS br'u-i ENE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCSO„r?JCAMQtIGF► T J l _ //! BY: �. Larry-T 23cNie , Clia zma r -ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary ; r, BraO BLt 4r, Secretary -Of the P]anniuq Commission rof the City;;of Rancho Cucairangr. , d ',hereby certify that the foregoing z2eeolutian waa dulg and r '= regularly+ introduced, passed' and adopted 4:y the Planning Commiseion of the City o.'Rancho Cucamonga, at .a regular meeting of;-Ue Planning Commission hrld: oh the 26th day of June 1991,;.cy the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: \\ NOES: COMHISSI03ERSs ABSENT: �'v?B4ISS30NRRS j _ c^- t.C v ..ear.. ... -..—. �,r .. �C OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TAFiF REP61tT -"- DATE: :'June 26, 19,41 TO:; Chairman rgpkHambers of the, Planning commit pion u FROM: Brame Buller, dty Planner BY _ `.Richard Alcorn, Cede Enf cement Super-_!aor 7 SUBJECT: EuyiwwmmTAL'tiASSESSMENT ''AND AMLOPMF;3T CODE AHENDMEN: 91-03 - CITY F RANCHO CUCAMONGA -''A request to add iA Section 17.08.04G-P and, .;'I7.08.070-E to the ` Development - Code establishing property maintenance standards and ongoing maintenance requiremr�nts for multiple family dwellings Staff aa_requesting a-continuance to July 10,-'1994,'i order a consider this am 3ment in conjunction with the develcf g" 3 pment s;.ai►dar�ls and design, guidel;nes for multi-family residential development. n :� I Rea gull aiitted, EN/ B' ul ;l Ci Planner _ _. as:g8 - lk ITEsI s? PLANNING CO.iMlISSION STAF RE€ORT ' L RE. PET SHOPS Dune 26, 1991 Page 2 9 1 ,1 „ IV. RECOMMENnATIONS Bas(d on the above ana��ysis,,,staff ,Eeels�*ha the de as dtion of pet siltops as .e�tth ' as--`pe,,, tted o= tconditionally permitted land use to the Offic:/Comm ia1 District, would be X ": inconsistent with the intent Hof this dii�rict•. however, if the ;.�Comr(ission can make thC,appropi.,iate flndj.�gs, then sidff should be a directed to initiate a�;_`amendment to that- cific Plan. RespecIfli,11y'submitted, J 4�/ o f Btad uil.r !!! City Planner Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Foothill Boulevard Speoific"kpn, - Land Uses pus t, Exhibit "B" - Letter from Proponent"'- C� CITY OF RANCHO-CUCAMONGA lz It STAFF ktPOAT DATE: June �3, 199', "OP y, TDz Chairman and Members of the Planning Cummisslou ' FRnM; Brad Buller, City Planner';, y BY: 4ruce Buckingham, PI-Nnring Technician SUBJECT. CONSIDERATION OF ADDING PET SHOPS AS A PERMITTED OR CONDITIONALLY FERM11T D;f USE IN THE "COMMERCIAL OFFICE DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN. I'. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is for the Planning Commission to review and discuss the proposal as mentioned above. If the Commission` can make findings in favor of this proposal, then staff should be directed to initiate and prepare ',n amendment to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan.. 1I. BACKGROUND: Pet shops are currently a permitted use in the Spec3_lty Commercial (SC), Community Commercial (CC),' and Reg,.onal-Related Commercial (RRC)\�Districts•,in all four subareas of the Foothill Boulevard 9o\et-ific Plan (see Frxhibit W). III. ANALYSIS: The �MSPxhas three= land use categories which designate office as the primary use with varying levels.of office ielated services; Office (0), Commercial/l'>ffice (CO), and Mixed Use (HU). The Office land use district a. intendca for professional and administrative offices as opposed to other commarcially oriented land uses. The Mixed Use land use district offers the unique combination of high density residential "uses, convenience-oriented coaaercial usaa, arcd compatible office uses. The intent of the Commercial/Office District is to provide activities �, which cater to business support and personal e:,:,rices. Typical uses include copy stores, insurance agencies, ;t_avol agenciesi etc. In addition, all office uses are permitted within the,Commercial/Office tistrict. This creates the potential for office uses and of'riee, support services to be'located'in the :same: center.:::: ' .-. Furthezmore, r- ace the FBSP perm"tV pat stores in all Commercial Distri r rl►ere i.:`un abundance of retail-oriented centers suited yav�-his use; This is preferable t. - th! Commercial/office District vhere.iiat stonis could be incompatir with office uses due to noise fIrm the animals. it THNT 0 �' MGR­ "REAL ESTATE May 10, 1991 CITY OF'?Aq�HO CbCARtOMgA ' His. .ri; Chairman of, -Flanning Commissian � p� City,' of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamong;,i, CA ,-�91730 A RE: Rancho Terrace center 9583 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA t _ Dear Planning Commissioner.-,, "f I am the property manager for the retail center known. as Rancho Terrace, lccgted at 9581-9625 Foothill Blvd. in Ranciio& Cucamonga. Az you axe most likely aware, we have been experien^.i,ng a lot of trouble attracting qualvy family, orientated businesses' to our : center ,'*e^suse of all the new locations.` �'ux:rently, we have signed a lease, subject to city approval, for a pet store�Ior 2700 sguara­,iet. However, the majority of all their business, will be., tropical fish, bitd,�,, reptiles, pet food, and Wr supplies. There will be no sales or gr,'%oming of ,Rny dogs oX cats; ,i I realized that we n•ay need special q�?prtival_f;a allow`this use, so , I am asking on the behalf of 'the owner and tenant, for your�-co-, operation in allowin}l this ex;seption to the Foothill plash and amending 'it 'to allow aIr tenant's usa. ' Also, in Dzcember of 1990, we parking lot restriped, The use of this tenant do4?,5 not -require any more 'parking 'spaces' than any other permitted use.zn the'ceatr:,r_ I firm],'? believe that this tenant will not only` -be v benex"It to' the ;'center and other businesses, but�,the city and its people. Please review the situation and,let me know if'I can be of •aiiy help in the appr66_al process. Thank you. Sincere3 Michael `G. Rademaker PRESIDENTAOL MGR SERVYCE�' YC. , MGR/esp ('t(�� j. � rp uj ! 1425 W.E00thill M. ® Suite Me �rpland s CA"!9986 ,%(M) SUMMARY TABLE OF PE.AHXTTEI3 EX3''P-4 3 CONDIT'I,-14ALLY PEBMITTE13 (A) USES. Subarea ad, Subarea Tao S?aarea Three Subarea Four —Retail Canaertial Uses SC Cc a 1R}' SC CC a tlfl SC CC CO UIR MR U fl£ CC RRC rR LI Florist Shops x x X x X X x x x Furniture Stares x .X x x x x x x Hare'a+are Stores X x x x x Health and Athletic Oyes and wueight Re,-.uinq Clinics x 0 x"a x a 0 x n+ )tabby Shops x x x x X x K if Ice Crew.Stores and Sida Fountains X x x X x x X X x Xf Janitomu Services and Supplies x x x X xt c -1sNelry'.'ores x x L X x X', x x Lary (self,SWA2e1 x x l Leather Goods end Lugqage Stares x x x x x x r x u quor stores u a o a p o a Vkssenger and(dire Services x x x X ,X x X D— tiusic, Uance,and Martial Arts Studios U x 0 x a x x X.> torpaper and&Ja;ini Strums )f x, x X X X x 1 X %. x I+ l )kTseries&Sardan Supp;x Stares — within enclosed area x x x x x GWce, Business 1(adina a:rd Computer 4 torts t'Y"� Punt, 61413, idaiipop Stores x x x .Shw x x x x I x d if Fhatixgry i•_ x x x X x x X xa ••. it"taarants (sit dauil t —� a) (dith entertainment and/or _ ta•virq of alcoholic haver 0-1 0 0 a a a n 0 0 b) Incidmttai sev£nq of bee and mitre (without a xocktail lounge,ibar, entertt::n�E, x e or x X a X x Q 0 x z c) Cafe Ilmated to:M soots (Inc�Wig.04*LT seating) 1+ - x x x X x x a x X d) Fast Foodt with driw-t:.0 e a 0 a 0 *IU-Mt drive-tlru 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 Sho►:Stor esr title and RxWr a. a`, X X X x, X x X X _ _ �. specialty lleta£I u'IF 0 p p 0 Sporting SoMs Storest Spccialt ii bac E,skiiicq,ae) ra- fishi s atc. x x r k'C x x x x lr) l) ccgxasss.ng a variety of is squnpaent I x I: x Svsa market9i x f� x X x 5Axininq Pool Supplies r x X x x Ttilor Shops x x X x, X,;,X x X Telev£sila,�VCR,St •'to x x: : x x Cumponent i Y s . +.�