Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1991/07/10 - Agenda Packet
Of 10 1919 1 p c -NDA 91 AG od „ v' Goo AMc�,�,c�` 'CITY o# RANa-fD CUCANDNGA ,LAAGk}1�INEN CAI I ION v r WEDNESDAY JULY 10, 1991 7:00'P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC GEI9'i'EIt r§ . COUNCIL CHAMBER ldt,00 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ,CALIFORNIA I. _Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call c a Commissioner Chztiea Tolstoy ` Commissioner McNel o Comm 1r,5 ..tner Vallette e Commissioner Melcher III.. Announcements *' I IV. Approval of Minutes Adjourned Meetings of April. 11, �1 Adjourn'i-d Meeting.of April-25, 1991 {� � 'ourn d Meetin, 7 a g{jof 3iay. 8y 1991 May 29, i991 V. Consent Calendar l! The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be rcutine aT;3 non-controversial. They .will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern oveg any-'item, J it should be removed for discussion. r�{ A. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13351 - LEWIS HOMES A request for an extension of a rf previously approved residentia)} aubdivision ,and,' design review of 118(;Fondominj�6ms on 5 lots one' 9.,07 acres :of land. in;the Medium,,Residential District (8-3,4 dwe, fig units per acre) w1thin the Terra Vista Plani.ed, Common ty, locat�_d at the southwest corner o1'%errs Vista Parkway and Milliken-Avenue APN: 1077-091-34.' a, a B. TIME EXTENSION FOR CCNDITYONAL USE PERMIT tl - 'DES MARIAS ! A request for an :extension of a previously agorovea development of„ a 7,350 square( foot, day care facility o� =.9 � ad..es of, land within the Low Residential Disti-zi.4) (2-4 curel]ing units, per acre),, located of the southwest ..orrier of Base Line Roads --'-die mosa Avenue,--9 APN ) �077-041-57. G. TIME EXTENSTO�IjFOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1131 `t- DES MARIAS - A request for an extension previously app:toved subdivision` of 1.98 s ` of land into 2 parcels in the,Low Resid �1 District (2-4 dwelling units per acre); Id d at t}c:_.southwest corner of Base Line Road` nand Hermosa`Avenue - APPI: 1077=(341�-57. l ' D. TINdE EXTENSION FOR VESTING - TENTATIVE TRACT •Ii890 KOM,',8TEAD A request for an extension 6 of a previously approved vesting tentative tract nap consisting of" 166 single ,family lots on 40 acres of ,'land in the Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling; units per, acre), located ton the north vide of Highland Avenue- Routh of Banyan and west of Deer-P-reek Channels- 7.PN: 201-27.1-13, 14, 33,• .34, 41 'and 42' andi/Mot "0:`,, Eti1 TIME EYANSION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13890 HOMESTEAD A request for an extension of a, previously- approved ; design review of buildk,)g elevations and s 7 detailed site"pl;?n for 91 lots (Phases 1 and 2) of.a vesting tentative tract map consisting of, 166 single family lots on 40 acres of land 1i " the Lout Medium Residential District (4=8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Highland Avenue, south of Banyan and t , west of Deer Creek Channel - AFN: 201-271-13,, 14, 331 34, 41,, and 42. F. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14135',. - :AffitANSON - A,, request for `an" extension of'" a previously approved, residential 9"division of, 319 single family lots on 54 `acres of land in the Low Residential district (2-4 dwelling ',;\ units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Etssnda Avenue and 25th' Street ' APN: 225-082-61. t' VI. Public Hearings The fallaWirig items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Che'Irman and address the Commission b`y ,,,stating 'yo;.r name and address. All such 'opinions ` ;lsh_all be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign-< after spearing. G. ENVIRONMENTAI,, ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 91-(¢Y - CITY OF R�NCdTO ,;' CUCAMONGA - A request',tb amend the Devalopment Districts Map from 11OP" (Office Professifonal) to 1!FBSP" (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan) for an _+ 8.3 acre parcel located at the; northeast - corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, - APN: 227-152-19 and ` 30. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continues: from June 12, 1991.), 5' H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS5.6.4T AND FOOTH1 i- BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMi 1 91-01 - GIrilY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA —A regp -�C to :amend } e Foothill ' Boulevard, Spacizi� s.i11dn tothe ± 8 acre parcel at the northeast corr4-,r. of Foothi?�1 Boulevard and Rochester Avenue with-in Subareax4 and establish st nc arils '''for d6C elopment APN: 227-152-18 and 30- Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration (Continued f� from .?une 12, 1991.) f I. ENV-RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ' .TERRA VISTA CQMNNNITY-PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request- to establish certain - streetscape and site design 'standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan for 'that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Staff recommends issuance of; a Negative D•Rcl<aration. (Continued from June 12, 1991.) u. ENVIRONMENTAL~~a,SSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01 -' CITY'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A request to establish certain streetscape and, site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard- within `the Victoria Planned Community-c Staff recommends issuance of a Negative' Declaration. (Continued from April .2a, 1991.) 4 1 j( r \3 K. ENVIRONMEI'TAL INDUSTRIAL SZRMFIC.2LAN AMENDMENT 91-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish certain str—eets ape and site flesign standards ; - consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specificflan for that portion of Foothill °Boulevard\ tp thin ,.the Industf i,al Area Specific Plan. Staff `recontaends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continued from,April 24, 1991.) tF q L. ENVT?20NMENTAL .ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TE " _. 15172ti - JERRY COCIW.,E - The development of a 20-unsE� condominium complex on 1. 08 acres o£ land in. tha Nfedium-High Residential DistriAf 'f (147-24 dwelling`units 'per acre), located at the I terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street - APN: 207-251= 22. M. ENyTF'.ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1&1?' DEVELOi�MrENT CODE At PFIDMENT 91-02 - CITY 'OF RA.NC, 0 CUCP.MONGA - A re` t to amend various. devel.tpmeht standards and,es design guidelines 44i multi-£cmily red dential districts. c Staff recommends issuancc;of a Negative Declara.ttion. (Continued 1, 77_ June 12, 1991.) N. ENVIRONNIENTAL ASSESSMENT AND �ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN: AMEND;IENT � '91-02A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '' - A request to- amend various development standards°and design guidelines for "multi-family residential districts within the "Etiwanda Speci Ic Plan °area,. , Staff recommends klc issuance of a Negative Declaration.6 (Continued from June 22,' 1_49i <, " 0. FWIRC.YMENTAL" SfiS MkN2° r%4AND TETRA VISTA k> PLAIMED. COMMGNITY; AMENDMENT 91-02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAR;ONC,A - A request to amend various development standards and designguidelnes for ''iulti-family residential districts within the Terra Vista Planned Community area. Staff recommends" issuance = of a Negative Declaration: (Continued from•June 12, P. ENVILr�14MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA: PLANNED COMMUNITY AMEND14ENT 91-02 -" CITY OF RANCHO quQMONGIN - A, request to amend various '` development standards and design guidelines for multi-family residential districts,.within the Victoria Planned Community area. Staff recommends. issuance_ of a Negative Declaration. (Continued fYom June 12, 1991.),. 4;' Q., I3NVIRONMENTA.L ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE ":•: AMENDMENT 91-03--- 'CITY OF RANC96' CUCAMOR9& . request to add Section 17.-68:040-P "and Section 17:08.070-E o.. tithe Develop;ient Cade establishing property maintenance standards and ongoing maintenance requirements for multigie family dwellings. R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE. TRACT 13808 AND .VACATION OF A- PORTION "`OF EAST 1lVENUE 'LEWIS HOMES A residential subdlivision, of 49 single family lots on 34.`( acres of land in. the Very Low Rdsidential, District ;,f1-2 +dwelling _: units per acre) of the Etiwranda Specific Plan, located at the'southwest corner of Summit and East Avenues APN: 225-181-04, 06, "07r 08, 42, ,anu 4P and 225-20.,-28. Staff recommends issuance of a"Negative Declaration. Associated with this projec. is Tree Remova.Z Permit 91--15., }, (Continued frt `'June 12," 1991.) r S. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - fkAM'S `PLACE A request to conduct live ,gtisa c',in conjunction with a restaurant and r i located in the ; keighborhood Commercial iksitrict at " 6620 Carnelian Street, northwest corner of 19i:h and ,Carnelian, Streets APN: 201-82-1-56 through 60. 9 (TO BE CONTXNUED TO JUZY 24,;1091)4 T. '1 CONDITIONA1, USE PERMIT 78-03 �SAM S PLACE A review of compliance with conditions of approval and consideration of suspension or. revocation of-the Conditional Use Permit for a restaurant and bar located inthe Neighborhood Commercial District at 6620 Carnelian Street, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-81.1-56 through 60. (TO BE CONTINUED TO JMY 24, J.991) U. AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL ' USE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE A request to extend the;,hours of operation for an existing restaurant and -bar located in theJNeighborhood'Commercial`District at 6620 Carnelian Street,' northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets APN: 201-811-56 through 60. " (TO BE,,COATINUED TO 'JULY'24, 1991) V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-19 - Ii & L 'CHARTER - The request to establish "a vehicle ;'storage and maintenance facility in a leased space of 4,56.0 square feet within an existing .industrial bu dding'on 2.24 acrzs of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at 8801 Helms Avenue APN: ' 209-032-59 Staff recommends issuance of a Negative`Declaration. i U7. CONDITIONAL `USE. PERMIT 91-14 - ROCK SOLID CHUP.CH The.request to establish a church ina leased ,space'.: of 3 :520 square feet within-, an existing multi-tenant .: industrial` building within the General V ustrial District (Subarea S): of the In ustr dt specific,Plan, located at 8680 Helms AV'?nue - APN: 209-922--18. %� j' X. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-13 - INLAND EMPIRE STAGES The request to establish a. bus charter service I,I within an existing building on 3 acres of,land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) Of the Industrial Specific Plan located at a 567 8th Street AM „ 209--171-38. Staif recommends issuance of fa Negative Declaration. Y. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND .TF,NTATIVE PARC,FL MAP 13919 WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A subdivision of 193 acx'e's' of land into 2 parcels in the Low Residential District- (2-4 dwelling units-per acre),; located on the north side of Highland,Avenue Brest of Etiwanda Avenue APR_i 225-161-19, M32, 33, and, 34. Staff recOml _.'nds issuance of a Negative Declaration. ri Z. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14679 HANDAH INTERNATIONAL - A residential sub\iivision and design review of a one-lot subdivision ),for condominium purposes for th& DevelopmentItbf 8 condominium units on 0.8 acres of laifn ..'the Medium Residential District; (8 14 dwelling units per .-acre) 16cated west of Amethyst Avenue on the north side of 19th Street APR: 201-474-04. Associated with this application is Tree ,Removal Permit 9o- 17. Staff -recommends issuance of ;=a Negative Declaration. AA. ENVIRONMENTAL' ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT : 90-42 - HUGHESS' INVESTMENTS - The development of an integrated shopping .center including 13 commercial buildings totaling 318,283 square feet and a service station/car mash building totaling 2,300 square feet on 31.13 acres of land with Phase I development consisting of 5 buildings totaling 267,96C square feet on approximately 22 acr�a_s in the Regional_Related Office,/Commercial D1v�rict of the Victoria community Plan, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 229-021-10, 151 1"9, and 28. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 1 a ,1 l �� BSA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TgNTATIVE PARCEL a MAR 13808 « HUGHES TNVESTME?dTS A subdivision ✓ of 31.13 acres of land ;into 1S parcels in, the Regional Related Office/Comitercial District of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the south side of Foothill boulevard, west of the future Day Creek Boulevaird - APN: 229-021-10, 15, 19, and 28. Staff recommends issuance c�f a Negative Declaration. b VII. ' Old Business t, VIII. New Business' f. IX. Director's Reports !.a X. Commission Business CC. SELECTION 0? CHAIRMAN AND VICE-CHAIRMAN. DD. TRAILS ADVISORY COMTTEE`APPOINTNENTS ' XI. Public Comments �; n t This is the time and pla ?e for the ,general public to address the commission. Items :to `be discussed here are those which co not 'already appear on this.;n agenda. XII. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that „set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment time. if items'«go beyond that time, they shall, be heard onll with the consent of the Commission:. ' I r. 9fPI4Tf• • em rxamf• 6•:� a • ° {I • '. raaf em• a m•� .a 4 � ■grxaa 44T ! • r� a � '.� • e�am.au oa••®' �.e r pig 1 Yl;tl _ vwvor 3 ' C CM.Mr A F �CRNJL AA s � 1 ,yam 11 Citi' of rancho o,ucamonga `r x�' '3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 10, 1991 1. TO: 'D Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad 'Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENT1101" TRACT,13351 - LEWIS HOMES = A request for an extension of -a previously approver'� resident al subdivision and, design review, 118 condom mums on 5 lots cn 9.9�,acres of land in the ; Medium Residential District' (8-14_dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Community,; locate at the souchwest corner of Terra Vinta parkway and liken Ave nue - APN: 1077-091-34. I. BACKGROUND: On July 12, 1989, the Plann.—g Commission originally approved Tentative Tract`; 13351 for the development of '18 -' condominium units and 8 •single fq,#Iy lots. Subsequently, a separate Design Review aplslication."s sukeitted and approved for the •8 °single family lots located at the western portion of the site. The single family lots were .then recorded as a -aeparate tract, Tract 13351-1, separate from the condominium project. The construction documents for the single r!imily.lots have since been approved and construction has commenced on the "tea Several plan checks have been completed for t4ie Tract Man and the Landscaper Plans have been approved for Tract 13351 but it. appears that;the map will not be ready for recordation until several months after the orig3mal expiration date of the projec:C:i As a result, the applicant is requesting a one-year Time Extension. Under the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, e:_tensions may'ba `granted in one-year increments up to a 'maximum of five years from the original approval date. This is the first _Time Extension being requested by the applicants `- II. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the'`proposed Time Extension and has :compared the.:proposal with the development criteria outlined in the Terra Vista Community•Plan. Based upon this review, staff has determined that 'the project is consistent with the development standards for the Medium 'Residential designation of the Terra Vista Community Plan, The project is also in compliance with the r objectives of the General Plan. J J� ITEM A '1 PLANNING COZ IKISSION STWF REPORT TT 13351 - LEWIS S�jOMSS July 10, 1J�91 Page 2 11I— RECO141£NDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission' }t•, gran'ta one-year.Time Extension for Tentative Tract''13351 through 1 adoption of the attached Resolution. Respec submi ed, Brad Bu .er City Elnner BB:SM•mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter-r-om Applicant Exhibit "B" Subdivision Map Exhibit "C" - Site Phan `� •, 7 Exhibit "D" -,Landscape ,P2an Exl^ibi:z 'E" -,Building Elevations Resolution Nos. 89-90 and 89-91 Approving Tentative Tract. 13351 " � Resolution of Approval for Time"Extension for-'Tentative T`' ct 13351 I! 1 1 I MADOLEE AND ASSOCIATES,INC.OF THE INlr�`,AND EMPIRE F, CdnsuIting Civil Engineering Land'Planning and purveying 10601 CHURCH STREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 TELEPHONE(714)948.1311 SUITE 107 J FAX(714)948.Wit CITY OF PAING.HO COCAMONW, May 20, I991 J. N. 126-9495 ;* MAYN 4 Planning Department Al PV CXTY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center, Drive ' P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,; CA 91701 Al'jW Mr. Scott Murpigg RE: Tract No. 13351 tentative map expiration date. Dear Scott: On behalf of Lewis homes,` 1' ant writing this letter to request 3 one year extension of the tentative map en` iration date for Traci: 13351. As you know, the eight single family lots, -Tract 13351-1;' have ,already recorded,: but it appears that the condominium portion will ,not be ready for recordation until shortly after the current expiration date. Attached you will find the application,, fee of $E2.00 you requested,,,be submitted along,with this written request. Please call me if .you need any additiono,material or have; anl questions. Thank7yoy for your''help with this Respectfully., MADOLE,:,AnD ASSOCIATES, INCH OF THE INLAAND EMPIRE .77 7 es B. Lange, P.E. JBL/jg CC: Mr. ,Joe Oleson; Lewis Homes` G - „ - d 0, L Ta =T NC J _ 13271 --_. r 111 Ij li _— _—;-- —c.� r -- — --. — I ,�.. _ - _ _ y �. 4 LI+ i� r✓ ♦ �1, h � Z'\ ! {a / 1 f I 1 21 { \t�r,a.+c^ (EXISTING —t VINEYARD �ri 5 •rY�\\ a ' TRA:T `J. 1 j�,Lyl II. i 11 ------ I 20rt 19 � 1 If / r ♦ r g / � �;- I IFi 1 1 ri .=� ♦1♦ r 9 r -� L-�-�.r� � Il if �1 I � r�rr � ♦♦���♦♦Gf i j J 1 1 I I I I I 1 I �j j rr� / r ��.. ♦� ! 9 I )c 1 II i !2.i 13 1_14 1 I! 1 1 r ACTJ i ♦♦♦♦ ♦♦�♦N�. �!° l 1 1126T!-3 i II IE 1 l I f r i ♦� ���` I 1 1 t l�l I I (I ! 1 1 � 1 I NORTH CInJL7 ul OF Oat 13351 NCHO CUCATM N6 TITLE: sir ►:'yr5i r MO PLANNING DIVISION A EXHIBIT:�.SCALE: ,F � r YAYNMAT lEttgN PEZ°Rtg6 �'Y n .H sT TRO .tom 1L',1 y; 1 NORTI �� T i c S j n t a� � W •� �xr's�,►� homes 'XCITY OF ITEM: I; RANCHO CUCA ONGA TITLE: PLANNING Divisi®N A EXHIBIT: G SCALE: 7-�eyvfJ<�1�:SQi+::1i'uYr mow'� �(ieT.� �����i'��•ti qwn N,ill. �,�Al a�••• is E}� � Kin; �+ �IliA t .N4ar1.f�4i 1 � -�z Val �i n' / I i s Vie. Aix ��r- �' ,h ^\ _ rxis�>:f�,.; ��..pA•'^ �I• __— _k- x.. �i lki n �,� REAR ELEVAr.WI 7 , Vic• ��....�r.� 7 �'�"'6' ��--�,_` �i�� WTI mt :y ... a .� mom .: FRONT£LEVATION • -@ATEM1iOR ItA[tfliALS��``�, M[L1[M f000 fttCLLRM t CNCAtL[TA[AOOf Il O ITEM:�.� i► DWG?` 13351 PLANNING DIVISION ', ti —• . /II}.tad c t-... at .. I---7p ? r. Safi '. S �a • � 1V _,� \ 11 t` + �' �.• `�.e>. " LEFT SIPEELEVATION Eil£PIOA YA7EdIAiS All to ({ t D f✓•1CY•7A0. :(COYCIIlT[ALY■00f 1 t4, TLN�r .�yx•t tiff 1 j'1 T � C ilw F,. Y'+M+� i�sN?l - --..tea'—F-�...•t*."�p�� ��� ^t—t � Y•� _.T4- - RIGHT SIDIE ELEVATION .... CIS OF IT�,'a : 5v'�i� � 3 A i LJ 1� <J1�J � Tlnvz; �f///�liJg A�Tr II�C DIVISION A"$ EXHIBIT:�-z:.. FRONT ELEVATION l?`•;�fi •r�� rI `��-� - ice'; f P__ t i 1 .i t I e 1\ ♦.EFT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION . '� •. �� r Imo? -i-• r. ?«• �� ' � K ' ,.. '..-..6 ram:....'. SIDE ELEVATIQN' WTY I F Ta > ?rUc��1-35 `TEM RANCHO CUCA O G TITLE: ! leWl,�n5 RESOLUTION NO. 89-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE fkACT MAP NO 13351, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 118 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND 8'SIr'GLE FAMILY LOTS, LOCATED WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PLA�iNED COMMUNITY ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF`AILLIK€N AVENUE AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDE14TIAL DISTRICT - APN: 1077-091-341 AND MAKING FINDINGS IN , SUPPLMT THEREOF A. Recitals. � ) Lewis Homes 'has filed an application for the.; approval of - Tentative :Tract Map Nc:' 13351 as described in the title of. this Resolution. Hereinafter in`this, Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as 1!' 6 application". (:t',) On the 24th of May, 1989 the Planning Commission of the City of Ranch:, Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearii, on the application and, continued said hearing- to July" 12{;-19a9;>and concluded said hearing on kk at date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. „ B. Resolution, AM NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved "4y 'ihe I Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows;. 1. This Commission: hereby specifically finds that all -ofr the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are trueand correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 12, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specizicai.,ly finds ay follows` (a) The application applies to property located' at the southwest corner of R9i ,liken Avenua, and Terra Vista Parkway with a. street � frontage of t790 Feet an-Milliken Avenue presently unimproved; ano (b) The property to the `north of the subject site is .a condominium project, the property to the south of tout site consists of single family homes, the property to the east i% vacant, and the property to the west is single family homes. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of; facts Set forth in paragraphs 66d 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: A- 4� f� PLANNING. COMMISSIO` '.SOLUTION NQ. 89-90 RE: TT 13351 - LE6.4 HOMES - Quly 12, 1989 �. Page 2 Ask \� (a) That tentative tract is cons tent with the General Plan, r Development Code, and specific plans; and ;> I (b) The design or improvements of 11the tont'�iive tract is 'I consistent with thE! General Plan Code, and,'specific plans; and (c) The sitei physically suitable for the type of dcveVipment proposed; and,: (d) The design of the subdivision is "not likely to cause substantial environmental damage .and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat,, arA- r (e) The tentative tract is notC=likely'to cause serious pu�iic health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with �j . any easement acquired by the puL%Iic-.,'at large, now of record, for access throtgh or use of ,the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This (f6mission hereby finds and'certifies that the project has been 'reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby .issues-a negative Ala Declaration. �- 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division' 1) Prior to recordatio'f of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the'.establishment of a hello- Roos Community Facilities ,District pertaining to the project site 'to provide in conjunction with the applicable School` Diitirict for the construction :and maintenance of necessary; ' school facilities. However, if gny School I District has previously established such 'a " Community Facilities District, the appli,rant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into. the territory of'.such existing District prier, to the rmc sn of the" final map ors the:, issuanCe of-building permits, whichever comes ,, , t first. u` v, PLANNING COMMISSIO" RESOLUTION NO. 89-90iq RE: TT 13351 - Lf a HOMES July 12, 1989 Page 3 f ( Further, if the affected School District has 1. not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities 1 District within twelve months of the date of , approval of the project_ and -prior- to the recordation of the final' map or issuance of building permits for said Project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and the affected School Districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school imp'kts as a'result of this project. Engineering Division17 1) Corstruct Milliken Avenue full width from Base Line Road to Foothill Boulevard,, including the traffic signals at ;Fnothill' Boulev..?d. parkway. improvements.beyondAhe tract bou'Waries may be deferred until �devel,opment of .the adjacent property. 2 ) The approved street improvemant plans fr; Milliken Avenue shall be revised' to include a bus, bay and right turn lane For the project driveway and the extension of the intersection drain, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3) The parkwoy'-and median island landsc'a;ping on Milliken Avenue shall conform to the results of the City's beautification study for,"Milliken. ( 14) Prepare a median landscape waster plan fcr Terra' Vista Parkway to the satisfaction of the City 'Engineer and City Planners The master fi plan limits shall extend from Church Street to 1 Church,r,Street. 5) Extend the Milliken/Terra Vista . Parkway intersection drain W outlet into the storm i' drain which ends 'at the south property nine. G) Separate final maps shall be recorded for the eight single family lots ;and for the condominium lots. 7) All master plail storm drain facilities within l Milliken .Avenue shall bed installed prior 'to construction of street imprC`=ements. iq PLANNING COMMISSIOP`-'ESOLUTION NO. 89-90 RE: ,TT 13351 -',-LEA HOMES July 12, 1983 Page 4 6. The-Secretary to' this Commission shall certify to " r" the adoption of this Resolution. o i APPROVED ANV ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY, 1989. PLANNING COMM? SION';OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: ra u , ecretagy .a + I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City=of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Conmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commissilbit held on the 12th day of July, 1989, by the following vote,to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, M&iEL, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY r r 1i oTLOr V V sVt y Y uY Y yN a a O ®L!rr[y Y y O G LIlk O {.p�qqddY qLY++Ow16GV 6yY C ! •YOY Om N C` AIM. 'Cry l�Y Q A. �.. '. .:lei �1p {+��SSsbn.. its e« �Yy q9q9 d CO�Y.0 �NrN :le YSii Gylo Yam@ lCF{N� ■• `r'�,�Y _^ � o i13 �a4 Masco gas r•�•Mr Its y_ YS$6Sg �C�Y�I Sw •e isk 6+pfM66 n sr« 6 a iiY V y�yg 1� �e Qa U. O Mya <=YYO tyVxM6.O NCE N 6+B 0 r F-M y Y 9+ i _ Y $SS $1��^�ul&o g�aa am�$';�w ®Eg.".. �c�g Via. u Y 3�$$ INX is—l"lV'« Y8 ego imi's � U «$i.— ilk«aa^g�g•g� ����'.. �Oy�pn +�q p��T.yVg it rrS�v'�i®�v��S_3YQ aI g• � $tiv! 06 V 9,1lo6 $16yg«�gA sw� �'' • AOL � 1 v� s $ TU18102 s . 4g Y S ® q YYY b Y P eez Is 6 t� ✓ N. w y g To. 49 h0 01Y�M: Atis f i x I .` AE 08. e ��.^� •. � 5^�... of g $ C 0. ytl� V C� t m®•aAdB ow. `d w$r is ga«x re`e1'' = c IL :zv • o b L Sc jetNRU . Yavg-� a » N aAR!�:g�jTy f �e j--ate ®_ YY.y;�w■■ 0`M` qw V . Y• `• •�C.Y`��Y_ $��� Yqtlw$ }A, o�•M Y¢�Otl�® gOp��NMi'. ®5�� CyO Y y �gp4 V. Ci^ C ` 1yy.` a".o. &L'�•+as«. .ryye'p$u �'i0:�ir .. .o-.r. �e$.a. 8sa 1 r� �� .�.^ ! Q $ r r•� r �. •s�Y .. �r,41 m.�� 6 9$1 A tail ilk SIR $ r$ k a r _ VW s $ M = 3 �� � \ - Ufa s jj a r"2 -,, 1-2 �e il di m" � 13 o y r it zjj! U8 =rits: ids r}oa 1'vo Z is Mid g=- 316 VV CC CC N. �tlO�.. G4 3 ^YY � OOtl OMSY.»+yrS ;.Ili irY C •yL V,. • • _iaCCY Sq. $ ayLy GGGOy cp�pCC{�0�.Y CiV L Y ie Y i y• » • F q M l O O Lp�. •_Q P w C S:Y r Y Y a. g GAL SS Yp y � S' 4V: G y'r Mgr SyY y. ilk CD q V Sq.YY (—ppp� G LY a'wpy r0— gOY�O�y C�Sa►•�q i Y ��:. LSI. MN+yYSGL. uce''�.. op O. lye. ? 'SEE N±�SY wO�WMA Yp LLbrr4=6N a E. ^V » L L w V LA Va{4� O Y Y MO M L »M Y _4V^ ym» '.^ n=� Q�I.. =Mr .,M.`N LaY pa__ aka . oIL � gi lil Est Y.»b'$0`S d riF 22 o`•�� »yY� � cp! YY Agqe(�y� »p iM N. Lr» qY ylVys L6MlYy vg — » =»Y�a tltltl O0000, LL�4...�0 � �J YL L-`e_ae.• RLA'@n•�j »7OOY8 �6�'�� 'f Ye4w. `IL o 0^'p `oTTT'T-`"'"" �o� $ipasewy� ® ai'a �� w, III . � �» ads = iN^`s $i lsg yg� y g N U1. $asa �� d�y� a �G' o a7�} y p� s air,! pIp V�r —fir 6'+ air,! 1w. r�I� � aM• s s »: re ris al Y 0 Y l s � � Is at �i: s'faz: se d s is m$ raz e3s r is Ye M,�V b =r a .s p�P (1 tl pe Y 9 V. Yf � � r• '<' ¢3 L'a �3i $ <1� C G � Wa'�'S.R!d '�A X 1 XI N( ,r t ^=' .iw 7.. �•tiu ■��'` •G YG .. Oeq. q 'O�Y ��d W' �w _ ` GC 4p� Y C1 �.O C tl 4 � GYM l VY • �•i �. YyY$Y`dO Y p^O Y `O .9 Aw Y Y 9 - ti pp IL i s s -as . z t CN MOY G Oa -it 7Y� .X� y�J ��V� C&' cc9 N C. 1 •+ OV[O Y.L..GL L6L_N SaaY Ypa =V V� ' er gom p�4y ' Y N L :51 c��. -�{' : 3gvr`5e.." 3 -,g9g gxq Nd�p a0 {i= �°� CI .YS. 1�. 5. ` YO y$sa� a Y� fizu WAX 2 <��q1 • gcY N p/YppG Y tooa�1yD�� tl �� � Y� � �� " _p L. $y N�„VW ••.}}��. qY pp pY•yyy Sy 6G Nyyppy ®® s O$s a`�"i�f�'� S'� � iiiI111 �ae Y 3.b'.�N � � G � WL 6o,A Y� bwg1.$ Ilk V - •i :ohs L — s$� $�-�' �$ sag b �a �a� its- 2 it stir his jj lux 11.0 1 z q p Y Y Y JAE id 8H inO� NN. r t- =8" Y "gm" `Z wwv opY- �idalp z H.: �11 i-i 2 H ■■ egg` + - N a LZa 3 a _7 r=! $ V -b ts� JVG i3 Ay-pw <zz alt Vs QI. kV+r.V 1A 7 3, .JJ $ao was V 6 r SIR1 iv y yy�o �� Y i,§.Cyi� Ny �5� N V o`er. \ �tl2. tl 4 aq P ar s g yq.�„ _y.wYu�� N '•I py�W*� �� ` ` y g. �� ► y�• �) 1i.�9p���y �Y. eVvl`k_ �``L^C Sd yy �Y�.O _W pY `�p ` L� � y• VC^�i YZ _.._ Y M4E ,..'` e'■play`. Y s M �� .. .\ 'O. .,�..�. QClY�_ O Cpp.9 � CC V@~@ CC o� $S q=� ny.44.Y�L C. ib1i O ff. Ly a R' Ma i`o u�o i _�. a�. pu'r9 Y8 1. . �� Lys s $.p.`'� 0 y �I � fq ♦ b �. �1 A. 1 ire .1 Fail flt all Ip r= is he ; ?N a` jlai Iail ass _ 33 ,/i Is Yit 'Y p rr .q L +� •® ! Y ^ �L�tlY V1i =3 �.� -S® as I20 b3 e� .:i �� • �$^A�' •� t�a�r s v Z TLI46 +Q 2 Ma a 3tVJAI i 3 Halt � y y y `` ai Y Y��.. •Y yY C 'a}�S ;Y� 1v y '� yYY , Ya YiY �W ..g•ttla y �� + �� 6I ` CEO .. a 5� � o � r :JS ISgas x zto � x.2,; a:s --was"0 s �n p j w�vY s �7E n as r a a.. - a s a" oY�QS by� anew 1° oapY g L YL LT L. Tom• aY 0r • = Y T^_= '. C� Y ` hi. B O.3� e ii <ti WYq`.►Y m OI •fir ^\ �.y 11 X xl kI xI ^I n 31 ( _ e4 Y +. Yam•«Oi' « fi O`s Xv- is M,r .V4 a B ^ ! ,• � � i \ ap{�.� e.�f3 ^B; ��(p may" � -1• �R• ^. �4 �a J$ I a N W Y Y S'r W •` 04 X14 „ —� 3E 3 a� C O JO` I T w g 5<y Y i �:Y ( Rod i t 1if TI in -Xi Zia a s M a �s lax is. E. dw ik IL 8 N Yp is RD a x ep� �_� $ $ s ..•a a psi _ N N _ Z s RESOLUTION NO. 89,,31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 'OF THE CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 'OR TRACT NO. 13351'FOR THE PIVELOPMENT'OF 118 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND 8 SINGLE FAMILVAOTS, LOCATED WITHIN PE?"RRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY ON THE SOUTHWEST` CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE;`AND TF7-1A VISTA PARKWAY rIN THE MEDIUM . 0 DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT APN: ' 1077-091-34,. AND MAKING FINDINGS-IN SUPPORT THEREOF i� A. Recitals. (i) Lewis Homes has filed 'an applIcation.,for the Design Review_of Tract No. 13351 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as.,"the application". (ii) ,On May 24„ 1989, the Planning Commission .of the City of RanchogCucamorga'held a meeting to co�isider the application and continued said g meets to Ju ly I?-i989. l..l Lill)' All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution.- NOW, THEREFORE, it bs;,Aereby found•, determined and resolved by the . Planning Commission of the City of Rancho C;icamonga as follows; 1. This Commission hereby specif;,sally finds that ail of the facts set forth in the Recitals,-Part A, of this Retolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented'Lo this tommission during the above-referenced meeting on'Jufyy 12: 1989, inc(tiding:-,written"and oral staff rfports, this. Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: 1) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; ah&A 2) That the,,proposed desii}i is.Vin accord with the objective of the Oev:lopmeent Code�, ad the ` purpos_s of the district in which the si,te� `s located; and `\ —: 3) That the proposed design is in comoliance--.with ^-' each of the applicable provisions of the �7 Development Code;,Td 4) That the ":3roposed design, together with the, fix' conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the-public-<;hgalth, -safety, or welfare, or materially iisjurious to properties ], or improvements in the vicinity. , F h v Z] J f PLANNING COMMISSION SOLUTION A.'89-91 ' RE: OR FOR TR 13;io1 - LEWIS HOMES f July,12, 1989 Page 2 _ a 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs �d`::2 above, thds ;Commission hereby approves the appiicatio:, subject to each anti xery condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, att..:,Sd hereto arid' incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division' 1) All retainingr;lwalls 'visible to public areas shall be constructed of a decSrative material I to be approved by the-2city Planner. i� 2) A final acoustical study shall be prepared and submitted for review ,.prior to issuance of building, permits The ,4tudy shall address the q noise generated aldh? 6uft, Terra Vista Parkzvay and; Milliken Avenue and shall' identify f mitigation,measures to be incorporated into the final project design. C z1 3) The Design Review Committee sht11 revie� and approve the following design modifications prier=to the-issuance'of building permits: ' a) The B-reverse and A units shall be deleted Ask frjln Building 10 to provide`move distance yr 'to the existing, homes ,to the south." The ;! parking9 stalls 'in this .area shall also be relocated to provide more back yard area. b) The rear lot line on Lot 6 shall be. revised " to,,provide.more back yard area.` c) Special detailing, such as wood rafters or brackets/beams, shall :be provided at the, bGttor of the second story building overiiatSgs,above`'the'garages. )� d) Stucco trim shall be used around the inset underneath< the stairs on t%a side elevations. This detailing shall also be used around" the showep' adjacent to the recreation building. e) Gas meters ,and/or any other utility fixtures shall be screened from view with lo%-, galls, berming, anAfrir `la�scaping. These"fixtures may also,,pe enclosed within <'outdoor storage area p'tf''possine. f) The green accent°color shall be changed to MF a less intense hue. �.. r PLANNING COMMiSSIC {,USOLUTION R,9. , 89-91 RE: 'DR FOR•TR - LEWlS HOMES i July`12, 1989 �I Page 3 4. The Secretary to this`Q_ -ssion shall certify;to the adoption of this ReSo+otion.'� kr� APPROVED AND ADCP.TED THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY, 11989., PLANNING CO SION OF THE)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �•. BY: �-- •:� 1 L- rry e e ,- ai n 1�= r ATTEST: ra U e tetary I, Brad Buller, Secretary,bf the Planningl` Comttission of the City, o'fY Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ce4ify. that the foregoirfi Resolution was°duly and, regularly introduced,�t passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission,-of the City of Rancho Cuca�pnga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of Ju1Yy, 1989,by tie follawing"vote-to-wit: AYES COMMISSIONEP,!;:r BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, WriNBERGER NOES: COMI'SSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY l _ z ' �.Yifpw�QrOL YyAb COyO� 'C �Jm�.q ��q be eY.GY `� w�1., �—fNJy lILY��YL O. JL C bmC dvi V G SY �• i�C O A Y=mGV �tlaCC V C x e A Y a�.•o'- 'i N O 1Z w e,v�.�Y' —@gip C�a�yNS iNA� Y6 potlb. @a * C y$ M{'� "= N`d�'� iIGYY YC..pH �pL�wO q•� �ptl 6msD C m09ry'Im Yre:d yM d G _8g 3Lo Y� "8 a �� 6 .J • Om. aN yIY3_ 6p ul 'Om .Y7 Y Cp NY�4sR vpL46t`Q' fKi O`I Y• mO Q, W1. -p, Ylbal : Y«f :..J OOI q' 9 gY.3M lvs iT � G wY E4 :'� pmpp VY, j1,iff"IfriL 'Its as v r, a a �m~: is b S' $ TL all 2 All Is IN v g2 p F b�..� $��s ny� Yboe —Oy�V��°.� ==�MM 'a 3.�."� L• Rz epn u.�� u .K9 er.$.� L r v „ • � .� :. p on „.. as•v w �er7 —.Sj ®moo.. $. • —r w� oa Xe-®�> far - bg� .HU$l9 =S �`3„ «� uH U g a ?. �_g s�, al d sm tj A$', Z�'8 ri ffi m$ XI dith 1 i I —3,= ® � ® 6 pry = `��. a ib�p..� y A • �• r.Yjj 6w S mr sea a Mae Z =3r Was s N�s� s _ 13eK � m3 =$la3 _0� IJ Mills 11, X1 I xl X1 X v� c Y�.dL CO d. 66 W OOOO amNJl�b� �i 71 6p b `° onSgmS e � eoEa J Oy �. e 3 uH p c 5�8�..apn yY�YM a day .eCn y. L ',Yi O1' ■Yyy V >C wYOp NY � � MR a Cp ^ C:G ..� O Q�p y O s V G Y.3i asa 'y..a �.p.p O��O V A•�.. ��ys-t' C y '°y 1�q -OVA e0a,! s^ Q=6C y��11 Y �.LN Ead �Ee AdC;+ ^aCC CCbC ee� 0196y tJ �O M^C 0 ;�dA�St a6.a. 13 �y CO 'nJs »a�,l eIg g 31 a 1a CpQO Leg i »�� .y. Q:B�gosB:.og�ag �3a, .g 5...:Ittip '.� 0Y0-v q P: 5> � � YY Gl� Wispy��`6 •,� ®�T `�Ye � � : `6` L_drd Yy L Y 9 q of Q �ee`c i _O O�M -.0.� d=d�y ■ e 0 gn Say w. ep� eN. O A � .pNN 'eu�i eiY4. �eG��., ` ® V B Y. tl M OYI L®Y® d.,6 Nw p B M Cw.� G a a O ► A '. N pN gYl� ym W ra L e �� ilia IN;H SA g� ragr _8 ale �•� _ = sffi ® oZ _ g s " 2-2 J � Y ay pp-- yo ljy(► � � � � r tl�`LV m� 'r• .0s M�6 p�'��� p6 tl� `_ry06 a is! �w' 5.�� u r � Y 6dbp ra ..� d o�►• � ci r :i � b W 22 •e�F$ ra �p=�VZ �` ?:$�}. of a':8e �y�ayy0.: ue�yc$aitg: c Yoho it•,^ '«=`oy 3�is � duo° �L�' �• i �1160.. QLCs � tL.i Yb qC�g `YY CL y y 66 C A Y y y �g z � ��r pY "•�'� !Y�yyy� a L,V O= YOC �YOSIIVJr� - S O■ �6�� �YOd^�..� �q 3�N s�� _$�o .fin ;� y�o•• !":,gig ^� �� v V•• �Ota M LS CY� 6C ;�•: � stl.S�b.V � ea^. O Y •iay ub9Y � t..�w•� y� O Y�� b y Cp�C S ry 'M Y b�r% g b M � V�O ti ,JbIY�«.t O ®6 4 M�� O y..q NCO. =z Slaw NJ.Y • Y ��Y Vs.�!gN1!` NJ. . ID� wg �CS`P� L y _g!S p ^� }�Wa}� ]�a�7�f. � •� yV� �'/ 4S Y �OY L'Mat �L Ma y gp 4,y�g+ t�b�]6p�y®w^`7�Q"j L Y •Y�!•• �q� g.44 �.r@o.�l a ti,ln6 -rs.q.Z'.:$ ^ F wC II V�iN Him �/• S gY� qp N V � s Saos $ v Via/ '3 `o.•r� =.3� �I ���. wo {�w.A gH our s o 33 S tl \ OOOY tH C M ii4 TL- a .� .• A w a 'j2 siR� •ge airmg • • � • bHl ,s e.•.Y wtl.�G _ ��yy`y L� p ■y iH� _ S R b by � 6 � .��� ��tl� •H. •■i •6�S ®0 Y � A� fyRjVY ai 3 a�■/:`i _ .p�pc�NNY a. •0 ti �Yp�(�6® N Mie Nss® O�� 6"Y pLSS Y®6 pt 7 ep_Y g. _il®o � � ysp ti H C V O H* ppbp, 69 j$�rj Y 111 _ 5�p M •, e 1.U.o 1% f 'a1. �L u t`OY.Q ue T Cp Q u � Y�SO.vp "Y J: s .p. a.•$ a,�. $�. �,� o� �� G"• y `C"wCL j o Zia p y ��`� Gy • pG O S a. O e N�LYC �L N r p N= e a:r a yy pp Q ^ gg C p S e C p aa{:w.�a S3i �,x�»a Y L�mf" 83 e$ L.. qbp e e y U•. +1 p• y Y e'`. -Trr :Sig. 13 o ,� ��y$y$• " e3=� �s IM ".-C bay:iz a� as 8 gIt b " - �&t_ Ps VIP Ell a ;Of tl say ` a : d $ a $3xg d z sft zeal a$ fQ@@gyp 3 s! a y • y N yq yak H O b 1> r yM € ' p� • qt e.V q3 03 41 v; qg= `Q Y`^` y@qQ• ® sin.. 6yv It s � y 9 7 ' yy p� y q 'I ZZ -; 1 c®SN ba ���� y11jj' R:$w� wu ® �� '�+ `1y;•-»p�� �a y mm • ... T y Y` �d n� aB$ xvr aT vy�1e} . $off 22p _ ' +O b"m '? 1� ��1L CL �.lb � pd Oaap �.• �w Y.P.. ��. � L� � gy - O m� w w ggpa 4grg� p d`a$..��• N.� .�.'$ aua�. wsu � ®s C$ wevl �7ew Alft sw _$ s � HsiILI �. IS �p m8! w �rw0L N44L • ' Ew 6 toll ME g SO .� dz. 212 q v a� i' pG �L - r3 C� v ,K moo` e5s r YM. ONO Q.V� SOS . ��®yy Wp " y Oz� G gp O C Al Ism J 6..•b � � Sit aSfC � �'� . • � � �:�� �g� �,. s � e .. a.e j1 RISC" i Ee® IMl FA i IL ri� .: a► =�..w N * ro .� a .n RESOLUTION NO. C _ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNI?,,1G COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,- APPROVING-A TIME EXTENSION_ FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13351, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION l AND DESIGN REVIEW OF 118 CO"NDOMINIUMS ON 5 LOTS ON 4..07 - ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY,,LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND MILLIKEN AVENUE,j� AND MAKII�Ci FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - AP'N. 1077-05L-34. �� A. `Recitals I (i) Lewis Homes has 'filed an application for the exten-ton of Tentative Tract No. 133'v3 as described in the. title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Res' ,xtion, the subject Time Extension,Mequest is referred to as "the application* /r (ii) On July '12, 1989, the Planning Cormi.ssion adopted its Resolution Nos. 89-90 and 89-91 thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Tract No. 13351, (iii) - All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this(;�eso`lution have occurred. 3. _Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: ,4 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts'; o set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolutionare: true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: I, (a) The previously approved Tentative Map is in ' substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans. Codes, and Polciest and < (b) The extension of the Tentative Map; will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and \` Policiert and 'he extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to caueablic health and safety problems; and (d) The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. r PLANNING COD24ISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT]P 3351 - LEWIS HOMES., y Juty 10, 1991 Page 2 �irh �J 3. Based upon the; findings and conclusions set forth in pa agcaphs 01 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time EXtension for:, Tract t 7 Applicant Exarrtion 13351 Lewis Homes July 12, 1992 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adopt`on. of this Resolution. ° J ~APPROVED 1�7 ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DULY 1991. j, PLANNING'COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ f"7 1 BY: o Larry T. McNiel,,Chairman ATTEST:' Brad Buller, Secretary _ AWk I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Comgiission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly. and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at-a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of July 1991,, by the;.fo1.l.owing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ;) NOES: ,,9MMISSIONERS: r ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: M 1 CITY OF'RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 10, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Bong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: TIME E$TENBION FOR 'CONDITIONALt USiE'PERMIT 87-24 - DES MARIAS A request for an -extension- of a previously approved development of a 7,160 square foot day, care facility on 1.98 acres of: land within the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling i(nits per acre), located at the southwest corner of Base."Line. Road and Hermoca Avenue - APN: 1077-041-57. Related Fill: Parcel Map 11311 Time Bxtens3�u. I. ABSTRACT: Applicant is requesting a one-year Time Extension for the proposed day mare facility as described above. (See attached letter of request.) it II. BACKGROUND: Conditional Use Permit 87-24 was originally approved ty the Planning Commission on May 25, 1988. The approval included conditions that required the preservation of the historic Minor House`,c:d the architectural compatibility of the proposed day care �i'` facility,„ On June 13, 1990, the Commission granted Its first one-year Time Extension. III. ANALYSIS: The Commission may grant Time Extensions for projects in twelve-month increments up to a maximum of three years. Staff has analyzed the proposed! Time Extension and has compared the proposal with the standards of the Development Code. Based upon this review,�-etaff has determined that the project still meets all the applicable development standards and Commission policies for the Low Residential Districtu' IV. FACTS FOR, FINDINGS: The Commission must make the following, findings in order to approve this Time Extension: A. There has-been no significant changes in the land use element of the General Plan, DevelL-'pment Code, or c:iaracter of the area .which would cause the project to become inC"Dnsistent or 1; Son-conforming. `\ ITEM-B `2 4) _. PZ13'�FXNG COMMISSION STAP� REPORT C[ii� 87-24 -,DES MARIA$ i July 10, 1991 Page 2 r B. Thit granting of an extension would not be dpkrimental to the public he<h, safety or welfa�l� or materially injuri,�us to 'properties or improvements in the vicinity, a V. RECOMMENDATION, Staff recommends the Planning Commission appr4q3; a one-year Time Extension for Conditional Use hermit 87-24 through the itdoption of the attache.1 Resolution. ti t$i l Respec lly submitted, ; Brad uller city Y�la uier4'j BB•NF:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A' - Location Map ?% Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Building;'Rlevations Exhibit "D" -• Conceptuar`Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" -^,Master Plan Exhibit 'IF" - Letter�nm applicant 0 Resolution at' 88-98 xor CUE' 87-24 Resolution of Approval for Time Extension fflp �r _ 89 as 86 85 69 it s7 s Ss 54® 68 ,36 'Si 52 SI 54 21 22 2 24 2526 r 1 67 36 r 2 'S4 ''01 02 04 06 't C, 1 � D - 9t 92939495 ,��., .zy� IB 17 I6 I5' 1� 64 '.1 1J Sf 20 59;g 1T 16 15` +. 40 142 i 99 98 97 6g'.Vg Coe6eaa.. 2� 58 0l0 242 k.. (os) 9 13 rJ 45 46 47 48 49® ( 09 B 12 12 1 ! i 62 28 07 7 Ii U II 1.1 tI it 560 SF'' 6 S s4 3 44 �'06 06`04 03 02 a] r a F Cocoon Arse >'•ry - I 'I 28 _ 29 42 'w 43 ..__.t,. 2.16.E 2: i 5? Ok d� 44 s.7•/� �.raze rr}>1 !6'+ .-.� y .�,�. ', X 40 R .415 - '►.. - p iis.N. Is..sM. 8&r' 40 CS q} .a+ 33 38 t 47 ,.1a Qa IEa.7> l irasJ. - 4V •o b .n a _ POr.LOt 37 rza4• q .roofs 1 1 35 49 dig aEET--:. Am C OF RA-NCFIG-,CUCAD'"'NCfA rrEm: — �® PLANNING DI'VISIO'1.1, f 'i7tLE: P4 34 ` C? EXHIBIT: Gi?ALE: r� '7s '��'�•r;e... j."'�G.,"..�. ou' .]Sn'surllnui*w:o+a 'MYI• •19 03�IY130 r t 11 I � �f� �r .i t •� t� ,off+f ti i f i�. �•• �� � I �. �,�7a 7s� 1 • t , ® +mo t VYf MI �S.00;10� W�r w� ' V off i f Z w IA V31i`f NOF f a+�pL E 16 IND `~ .`�, •� a K fl `� ` > 1 i.. t +�.•.c err f'f {I r7 �• 4 'Q \�. o ;` $�.j to r: } c 4 U r f wind /I 'i � ra � � u i Ls fl,.. u7 [c �aea--rp+r- t el i r L,.y_,y'r•f 1-1 > -cam■ WWI; r 'YFY SIHBVH'a sVY40HL yiiiilN� S,IV-3bO11H7�I3Si�i37 (`} 'a} � i Ell ft �I�.ii•l(II 1.1 I I 'i I i fit' j� �,•1 1�, i!•Ii(� I III+Ilia('! ���� j'Iti ' ( �j' I w h;ll'' l�• I' l ,I � 11 •'y I'�I I'lI) lu �, ,, I I i+; � ,ill _ ���) I ;� i; �lih{I►l�l�u)I `�� I i j!I i��l i�llal4( I ICI ►— i+'I p;lll(I ltijljll gi tl l D■n I INS, NNI /A �i. w t'■ Sf: t• {e • �-�--*T as a y t j r L _ a 0 3 f � ! ..i � ji i1�i��j � � e "• } � a WHIR s Q a a s t I..olp.00®Q ;u t ' � A i � s j �11�6- I �• 1 ; � jl�' I e 1 L `d • a 110 (: t 11 yf ••� ) �! .. r�s-�.,;., it 1 i II �� - .e� .� � a �• � �' s.n• e 11 � era c I 0 0®0 � •t'rf�•s.�ts`��wc r •'A 3 ,e,"`;.,' '�'.� !� �tl - 1 i:r.. J•a.��;r.♦ r V r F'.F' ..r.. • u�N a :_'E1 �a S . r yF y is '�t L t a®0 bn t sawa�po� it Yam® .1 i ®a t tt•- A - II 3 P" May 23 , 1991 Q o� :III Ms..Nancy Fong Senior Planner > City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O.Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, C.R. 91730 Re: 10089 Base Line Rd , APN : 1077-041-54 Dear sMs.Fong I am writing to request an extension of the following measures approved by the Planning Commission on-May 25 , 1988 1. PM 11311.for the purpose of subdividing the property into 2}parcels. 2. CUP 87-24 for the consttuctron o=a 7,200 square,foot day care center. 41 Auk I understand that, if granted, the extension will be for a' period of one year. Thank you for your cooperation. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to. contact me. Sinder ly, � s Paul A.Des it 1Ka rail rYIr 2865 N. Mountain Ave Claremont, CA 91711 714-626-5026 L � J 4 1 RtSOCtiTION NO. 88-98 ` A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMN,:VSI.ON APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE, PERMIT NO. 87-24 FOR A 7 200 't SQUARE FOOT DAY CARE FACILITY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST .CORNER OF BASE LINE :ROAD AND HERMOSA 'INi THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APN: 1077-041-54 0 A. `Recitals. (i) Gerber Children's Centers-2 Incorporated has filed an application f9r the :issuance of, the Conq�itional Use Permit No. 37-24 as described in the title of this Resolution. ,:5Herei nafter in this Resolution, t`e subject Conditional ` lf;e Permit request is < referred to as "the a,.,l i cation° (ii). On the 25th of May 1988, the, Planninof Commffz:sionti�f the Cityo11 Rencho Cucamonga conduged a duly,notice� public hearing on the3�application and concluded said hearing on that date. /,i t (iii) All legal prerequisites 'to thy' adoption of tf(,/[. Resolution have rccurred. B. Resolution.. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, ,determined and resolved by the Panning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: rrt' 1. This,Commission hereby specifically finds that`all of the facts 'E set forth in th6 Rotals, Part A, of this Resolution are trus and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission : r during the above-referenced public hearing on May', 25th, 1988;_�including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows `'(a) The application applies to property located at 10089 'Base Line Road, and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is Ia multi- family residential project, the property to`the south of that site consists of single family homes, the proRyrti to„the east is a' GTE.,storage facility, and the property to the west is a sif:gie'Gily development;jand (c) The'site contains a City designated Historic Landmark; 'and (d) The site is within the City 'designated Red Hill Fault zone. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this CImmissi'on Ask during the above-referenced public hearingand upon the specific findings of �` facts set"forth in;,paragraph 1 and 2 above;4this Commission hereby'finds and concludes as follows..,., t w r 'PLANNING COMMISSION _SOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PE"RMIT NO. 87-24 May 25. 1988 i1 Page,2 'J rJ (a) -That the proposed use is in, acord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development ,Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, (b) That. the proposed usis, together with the o conditions applicable thereto, # '"'" not be detrimental, to the public health';' -,ty, or welfare, or materially injurious to prop, ±ies or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the"proposed use complies with each of the appiicabs'e previsions of the Development Code. (d) That the proposed architecture is reflective of :the adjacent Minor House. (e) That measures have been taken to pre e+rve the historicaj� significance of the site. c, (f) ,That d� geologic,-,survey has been conducted,and J, that survey has been reviewed and accepted by an independent licensed geologist-,indicating that there will not be any hazard to the proposed construction as a, result , of the inferre-d Red Hill Fault. 4, < This Commission hereby f;lds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the-,California. Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission`'hereby'issues a Negative Declaration. S. Rased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph \` 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the`apli'cation subject to ?i each and every condition' set forth below and in; the attached_ Standard % Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Bivision --- (1) The river `ock used on-offs shall be of the same _color!t—r ,ose used. for the, public right-of-way imprd. �,-`"'at tFe corner of Base line Road and HermoW-Avenue, and' n the existing minor house'. ICU a� PLANNING COMMISSI/ .SOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-24 May 25, 1988 Page 3 r (2) The design, of the 'attic vents sha�'�.be revised to minimize the extent%f exposure`'Ynto�thi interior attic space. - — (3) Textured paving shall be used at points of ingress/ egress. (4) Ornamental landscaping typico of,the""bungalow" era shall be provided, u (5) Decorative lighti'g shall be provided on—site. (6) Accent planting shall occur at project entries which create an entry statement. (7) A landscape focal point shall W- established at the south end of the ,driver,ay off Base Line Road, (8) A planting scheme shall be f�repared for Parcel 2 which is reminiscent of a grog in order,,to create a environment which will preserve the os�iginaI character of the existing mouse. . (9) Fencing"shall br,'provid`ed around Parcel 7 which is the same as *t used to_e�ticlose the playground on Parcel 1. (10)c., Special attention sk'Nll bda\ iven to the landscape treatment of the '=.:cPeets "djoinina_, fne historic ` landmark. l` (11) All Site Plan and architecturaV c0siderations or revisions shall be subject to City '0anner review and approval. (12) A decorative sound attenuation wall and'adense landscaping shall be - constructed per }� recommendations of the acoustical0study to reduce„ exterior and interior noise levels on surrounding; Properties to acceptahl-* levels as defined by. the Development Code. (13) The operation of this facility shall comply with all, Taws and regulations of the State of California related to licensing and"operation. (14) The applicant shall subnit copies of all State licenses to operate this facility to the Planning .Division prior to final occupancy. PLANNING COMMISSION SOLUTION NO, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-24:; May 25, 1988 Page 4 t - (15) If the 9peration of this use is inconsistent with an of conditions y the nd iti ons of approval �' a or effects upon-!ad'acent pP 1 causes adverse _ x properties or public righ.s- - of-way, luding, but not limited to, excessive noise, vibration, odors, or traffic safe, problems, the Conditional Use Permit' sha1;1 bil brought back `a, the Planning Commission, *or their consideration and possible revocatfi:n of the Conditional Use Permit and termination of use. Tj u (16) This approval is ., �\ pP granted e> y for a maximum of I�3" children. {Iil, Operation of this use shall not commence until such. ,time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied:with. Plarts shall be submitted to the Building and Safety iiivision and Foothill Fire Protection District to \, show compliance prior to -issuance of building \ permits. - \;t All out .activity including recreation/play time, shall to the hours.of 10:00 A.M. to 5:00i P`M, weekdays. ,The preschool0hours .,hall be limited to 6:Otl',.M, to 7100 P.M. on weekd'a=y's. (1,9) ` Expansion of this preschool beyond 140 children, ' major changes to the development;,plans or phasing, or expansion of the use beyond that approved by this - permitshall require approval of''a modification to this tiCon.litionai Use Permit by the Planning Cortm4110n. I� (20) -A six ':5) foot decorative �b7ock wall shall be constructed the .entire west' Pro ert =1 length 'fo r sound attenuation purposes. Location and "design shall be re`jewed.•and approved by'the City Planner. (21) Prior to. the issuance of permits, the applicant shill o6 ain rights- of entry to the adjoining west properties tvt construct 'M y (6) foot decorative block wall along, the west` property line and to remove existing wood'fencin (21 Tile roofing material `shall be used ° subject to review and ahoroval by the City Planner: t 9 '� • PLANNING COM,MISSIM_ _SOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-24 ° May 25, 1988 Page 5 n uLneering Division (1) The existing drik•eprays on Base Line Road arve Hermosa Avenue shall be removed and replaced ith curb and gutter to City standard. (2) An in-lieu fee as contribution to n.:tye future undergrounding of the existing overhead ut-lities (telecr. ,uni'cation, and electrical, except foethe 66 KV electrical) on the opposite side of Hermosa Avenue shall be paid to the City pr"ar to the 5 issuance of building permits. The fee shalt be one- half tke City adopted unit amount times the length I from the southerly property- boundary to the northerly terminus pole just south of Base Line Road. r (3) The existing overhead electrical and telecommunication service lines to the existing house shall be undergrounded and the utility p le removed prior to occupancy of any new constructioh. �) (4) An encroachment permit is required for the portion f = of the existing house that will remain within the .to-be-dedicated right-of-way Base Line Road. The house will be allowed to remain within the right-of- way for the life of the structc,�e. 6. The Deputy Secretary---to this Commission shall certify to the c adoption of this Resolution. W APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY Oji MAY, 1488. r PLANNING CO. ISS70N Or THE CITY OF RANCHQ; CUCAMONGA Lar i cN e is rma •Tf"cs,. a u YZ re ary i PLANNING COMMISSION SOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-24 ,May-25, 1938 Page 6 Aft I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary cf the Planning Conanission or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that`the fore�niiig Resolution'>was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the-'Planning.Commission: of the, City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission heid`�— on the 25th day of May, 1988, by the`'following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONtRS: CHITItH, BLAKESLEY', EMERICK, MCNIELy 70LSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE' 1� ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE `\\ -�rvvvSSj t l ; ('\ L.r�Oi YQ+�yyw CCOq :_ ... C•i •gib C9� Y?.�44 • G r Y G a$$3_ss"g" ae�� �. �.�.r• � _�� :.was �" , Y•'�=.a�.."� •.o�.•� $v'.". ��II o.� -a g. �": It 01 If ti Z 81i; s. eg� -its1. 4 s 11jYc$s= •`: '• _�� $ fib:A g'r' T.'20. •.I '�e'•-,• ,,��3_=a" vas d>►. : jac _ �- = 3 =is SET, a m �P w as-;Tj_ 25. Is a ZZ ��. AdW Y is N A HE n pp Y � a : 9 }'8S `4�. -a C. �.`,oy..• 3 L�r eQ�eai aim u_. § 3., 1. f M V R` il a+ p C��yw L�rY OpY O�Ecb��'a; ��_Y�Wu :��- ZZ Az! �, O�OC 4�$,G Z'� q•..'b r AN ■b 1r` ,Y �y • = .. a7 ,. �y�d"� .-�a�v �} ,`,rcpcQ3,!! !e�' '. .Ai■�.ut.�gr3'.��� �C'�� �V{�00 �s�w� �_. �iY{� �p.�000000`_yvSy� .gq�•��� ��� .Y VA ZLIs$ 11=4 yam � 6q� Iu� «nY. �� �.. •aq ]4[ a f r..`UY�j Y p.® lai Je *tlwi �y. f4�tl �r L 60 CM X. '•® ® Y k. O . 9 a40 ` ic— galV dIT litr To w •� jig N Y ` Va oft TL is � 6 @ Jig a• Y ���5 �� Y$� -�4R - �'��: � "°�w�'®! •g is "'" � '''�'e�u,a.�o �t Mi y�g''Yas q w3•l O r Y ylPbw as�ai fM JSI. M p .. nW.g ® V o +V V 6.�1% s A r—a ..Y M D% ® T _ r b o ♦ a e$a� 4 V ,.O L '^ V w s:-•Ve� ._�W�, _A a a`®a.0 yy sOarm ,14H A 6 V py. Ac t,r �aoa ' •rN Q■t� � � c� y C� Y A m of .. O � s pp T� N ♦J� Y O�N ra. Lt;r Y'O C Y- St Y?Yr O O byM �q�00 w N� �t•1 N �i Y n•®�-�� �♦W �� o�oiC ., gm Yet '1 a ey mo Y"�2,9a'iffi'�s $. 4A Y�l�yi{s r /u' -n Amy$@� •CB= ■O y N. 111L3..1.� �•��0\ , q O�q L •w'�r QJ`1 [yp�I �L"V. � a p�•.`��E�`SNIt L���zz Tel Wg.y.tJ Q^p ?_F'» O �^,w� nM �OIV�N '� OYw6 CLI-...� q H t ®®a�� 0 IL ~ r�sC9 yy yI prp 9 YSI i Yp C T`yy[ N Y =.`i to R.b bra. i <tr�;$�wi ri to • v Y.N N� �.w• .®w�.pM 4.Oy 0C36qp y p� g i � Y. 1 � S y i ♦♦14 C1�®` e.2!A 41 � A.'8 q pSr ai �� E� ,dap■��� '1E -t` \M.... � fY�b/b ♦ tl�Y ��® 6' ad O�6- a � tl V1 Y' ' ` _® 9 l• dM t'VW�. � a® Q® raw i �0.Si± Ai aa• NG Y..Y.�G C q V ..'R 1 oil- e-WE O CYO rv. W •�c ar,,�+ 9�v eQ., i.e e.. Eqe . u5 Y. gFFJJrOO „ L .3cc ti Vpy6� 2 uo+l LaV eC: ae�..'.xiLj ® Op tillepr�tl a. $ j. �_ m b et NAB a ' 8pe'®: pY c fa4y bS i(,bgi ppY� w Y L l b� ;•' tltl bWY` d��� `q� � •iO FYI i—gib OL y o V H 4 U. S �JF�EEEEE $� U1i7t_ y 3 `antl uCE a�O. �f t\ Y� A.�{ �w�. it nioq ii A ` � y b � 3 ..•'g 3.�'� � yur+ ��w [`.`.� `�. 4a'� Zf igSe 1 �g z -3tl � -, g ' 'Nil � V J 4 ay d p � p q — 14 fib( g 0 bd® i �O raa,MV _1r •. � Y ! O 85I. e..� 1pga7 z vat iT Sn d 1 @� as w—Y�� V = 6 y Q:� � • Tab � M� Lgyii V�w a�b w • FAQ • ^its i N4' r r. 1 as 9.pe t nn. . b Y ■■ i� 4{. 'br'! 7 C1' s YOs Iry �gb �1f ,-3102 V [3f;� v `^` G C O ^' b •C :ae. — d V—a."ii C C < tea.... .• $ y-bate :a'a: .. .4 to .� al. —•o \; i'R� •Ot Y.wm Cyr'yr �.ii®2 lv V��� ` 1 i.� g " s � sw •� mow. I irk a � _ 34 y¢7 pO. C N qqL a p� ix Elul w r a-y—■ acses ddd (Vol Q off' � g as L• • Y cT xv NE�,e0i VV@ lyC awn, to66 � bV� � eo v 5. w S. V R Y-6— �s a V�s s•us ®_ ea a i ' V-9� e y N„0 ®... ;8 tl •�� ice. p:�� � M b: . M.6 s 4:�� '.. 9. b�.u.� 1; � ��. U'tl -Rv ba' .!. ® .O Al ay'yD �d1iJL 4,��j[� Lehi �e� 9 Vm! `. tk Ab A® N. vY rluVV y»Y GOn My �0V® -�'� or •A. Yl NQI �*4 •...t$ S® Qt i b�V 14 p N v J v O$ w N �j qa(�. ®pm�:� Q g M:A. �[ p ar. b L'-C A Y J2VVNm SBJ L M q`Y .r c.V Y.a V Lt. a OCL L G L� L �r9 LU 6✓�!! L — CC L q _ �� «W I:�L O � �i..vZiM�. o M 4f�. � .• ��Y LO a -Ez � ^d Ce a- , yyy s 6 V b tl Y. b V 5.• a Vg'a'� $, 8e1 g ` p9 �YVO`6 gam® c iqy b!!«�L .E•..�_'_ r. e_ .. a am'°' u.«o:�� � 3� �g '� ' _� «yEi.. u,w Y Y!�s y «ar'i� �$ �%• eVrug a�. E� «'� 6r « -1 . �Efa Wri Y• L Yl L gs �4b p • Egeei' Ea •ou .mod �� "•gym �a as 105 Ndfl Mat. .u� Ey :1 � amp emW ao 21 e e r" S v � pV yy FFFF 88 • O M so N �a ®p�� a tt :d6� �:ia nntl O e� m L 8 le Q �` LS ?��7dwZo Elf I Is o 34 •»a .. �N ■ �cbi�N :V� � � I. �.a•s^.tl�6 W��y a {`b S _ J��99LL^��..��YII W N 6 BB6 g a Cz L Y Y A C 9 9 Y L i l e Y tl 6 V a �� = 1aiaO <L � � � V�V�/.9•tl 's o v a� �r W a6 boa 1. O. ss� cup O R S$ =e t� Sad •. Arad 00. IIICCC biD b s e u emsleft it e 4z�. ® � b V�- Y� dill 22 oil .e-q q$1 .:al- ■¢p -`x 4 i9 {��Q.. o®�� q®8w. P �..ffi .•�.q p..N Y g d ,9 4 e.av4. �.py p M•� � �r M ` `e p act U Og C�i.L CO }l.1 iC `.�6r}gp,o ® N7l;1d e®M- Y�.P Zt IN ® r. a i _ IL ILI 5e a �Y "®®: �pa � a i_ � <a ,,a�ai.� dal. �6•n ,/� - r r . RESOLUTI4d NO. A RESOLIITSM; OF THE PLANNING COlyMISS:,ON OF, THE CITY OF, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,' CALIFORNIA.cr APPROVING'` THE,t`l TIME E 8NSION FOR; CONDITIONAL' USE PERMIT ' 87�24, A 1,160 SQUARE FOOT DAY CARE FACILITY IN THE ' LOW. RESIBENTIAIP DYSTRICT "(2-4, DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE}, LOCATED AT' THE, SOUTHWEST A rsm OF EASE LINE ROAD AND HFRMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FIIaINGS.:IN SUPPORT THEREOF APR: 1077-041 � �YA.S, the applicant has filed a .ttlme ly request for .a ti<:te extensia2s'of the project as destribAd`above pursuant to Section 17.02.100(�y ' { of the --elopment lode; aad- r. WHEREAT,:_ the Planning Commission o01W1citi0r'1sLl' approved the above-described Conditional Use, Pfsm t on May 25, '(t88, and granted a first f �- Time E^ctension on June 13, 1990. SECiiON 1: Tha Rancho' 'Cucamonga 2lanninv Cb mission has made tha following findings: A That prevailtng economic conditionsr have caused tea. distressed markiit Icli'mata %for"''6evelopment of the project. _ B. That current economic, mkikating, and inventory conditions make it ' unreasonable to develop the project at this time. C. 1hat strict enforcement of the conditions --fit a' ru:ral pp _-regarding expirations. would not be �t consistent` with thftintent of the Development Code. _ 3D.' +That the grant hg of said time'extvtsxon!Will not be detrimental to the public health, safety oe=welfare or materially injurious to properties or zmprovementsiin the vicinity. `( �r SEC3'ION 2: The RaneKS�Cucamonga P,la(pinri Ccmorission`•hereby giants a second Time Eittension =or_, �� f a Project . Applicant Expiration CUP 87-24 -Paul Des Marias); May.,25,'1992 f� V 2 PLANNING COMMISSION'RESOLUTION NO. CUP 87-24 - PAUL OSS MARIAS July 10, 1991 Page 2 /'-APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH D:Y OF JUL,T 1991. - 4 _ PLANNING COMMISSION, OF THE CITY,OF RANCHO [WCAMONGA G' BY: Larry T. McNjel, Chairman _ , ATTEST: p Brid Bu11ar4..Secretary 0 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the;Planning Commission of the' City of Rancho Cucamonga, de herb certify, that the-fore ` g y going Resolution` was, duly and regularly introduced ''passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission or the C{!ty of Rancho Cucamopga, at-a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held. on the ,10th dti� of 3uly 1991 by the following vote-to-wit: a; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: � NOES: '' COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:- COMMISSIONERS: +{ i v a 0 00 CITY(r RANCHO CLTCA.MIO A STAFF. REPORT o DATE: July 10, 1991 TO. ,rho#roan and Members, of the-PI Planning Comrission Yi FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Vicki Day; Engineering Technician SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL VAP 11311 - DES;MARIAS - A request for • an extension of a previously approved subdivision of 1.98 acres of land into 2 parcels in the Low Racidiq alp District (2 4;tdwellIng units per a;-rel, 'located at the southwe'st,corne, of Base Line Roar' and Hermosa Avenue APN'\1077-041-51 (Reference,'_CUP 87=,4) BACKGROUND: � �. Tentative Pan e1 Map 11311,as shown on ExhibitrC" was initially approved, f_ by tFe, Planning :Commission on May 25, 1988, :for an initial two year peric.; until May 25, 1990. The first- of a,possible three one yea^- time extensionp, :was granted on June 13, 1990 ektending the approve period j until May125, 1991. ' l I _ The aopl icant is,'pow requesting the second of a possible three one-year time extensions. The letter of requktst (Exhibit "A") is attached for your refere►ace. ) RECOMMENDATION IC °pis recommende4 that the Planning, Commission adopt the attached resolution appIng a cne year tame extension for Parcel Map 11311, Thee: � new expiration 'd4tp +soul d be May 25, 1992., Respectfully submitted, aC? Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH•VD:dlw Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Letter of Request Wbit "B" Vicinlay Map a� Exhibit "C" - Tentative Map Aesol:ution ` 4z r May 23 1991 P Ms. Nancy Fo+r Solar Planner City'.oa:Zancho Cucamonga P.D.Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga CA 9173u Re: 10089 Base Line Rd APN: 1077-041-54 Dear Ms.Fong: I am weiting to request an extension of the following measures :approved by the j Planning Commission on May 25 , 198E 1. FM 11311 for the purpose ofsubdividiu¢the property into 2,parceis 2. CUP 87-24 for the construction of a 7,200 square foot day car center,` I understand that, if granted, the extension will be for a period of one year. Thank you for your cooperation.,Should you require additional information, plefosi; ,do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, v Pa A. DesMarais 28t`5 N. Mountain Avc Claiemcnt, CA 91711 714.626-5026 �\ CITY ®� : rpm 1,1.311 RANCHO CUCAMONGA LETrEE OF ENGDWEMG DI ON EXWrP. as A " i t` ih ac oip��+ l lama oil t LINE Ic cm r � - 00 -; CITY OF rMLPARCEL. MAP BASEUME RD.' w .r:: • . � w " ; ; Ivy, Z40 Sy reavwaoosr }r 1 I �sitQg P r rfnL. PA EL MAP Jai f J M- GRMEMG DWMON ee �t r� RESOLUTION N0. A )tESOL,UTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF;,TNE CITY OF L�_, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME`9INSION FOR TENTATIVE'PARCEL MAP 11311 LOCATED AT?iiE�tUtHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE R(� AND HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MJAKING FINDINGS°IN SUPPORT THEREOF -.APN: 1077-09-57 0 �, ' �A. Recital (i) Paul Des Marias has filed an application 'for the extensi„n;._.of Tentative Parcel Map 11311 as described in the title of ihi$ Resolut#on Hereinafter i-,this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referve�,-�`�-1 r to as the ap;r`ttation. (ii), On May 25, 1988, thls"G6m6ssion adopted its Resolution No. 88- 102, thereby approving, subject-. to specific conditions -,and ties limits, Tentative Parcel Map 11311 and ssue'dQ,,a Negative Declaration. !. (III) On May 23, 1991, the applicant fil0'a request for the second of a possible three one year Time Extens,,ns. (iv) All ;legal prerequisites prior to the-�*doption-of this 'Resolution have occurred. t B. Resolution ? NOW,,, THEREFORE, it is hereby,found, determined,.:',and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of�Nkho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission her&.z�.specifically,finds that all of the facts set forth i^ the Recitals, Part A, bf this Pesolution are tr!ve and.co*rec#. 2. B sed upon'substantial evidence -presented �fi this Coirmission,� including writ+ n and oral staff rep-,its, this Camniission hereby spec#fically 1 finds as follcis: (a) Tho previously approved ''Tentative Map is6in substantial compliance(kith the-Cit's .current General Plan, Speci Fic Plans, Ord%ances, 'Plan .r'Codee, and Policies; and (b) The extension of "Tentative Mai ari11: not cause l significant inconsistencies with the,.LUrrent General Plan, �? \ Specific Plans, Or4,inances, Plans, Codes, and Pot ides;`a d PLAN BI GMMISSION RESOLUTION-'NO. „ c` r TENT PARCEL MAP 11311 - DES MARIAS «, July 10 2^91 "y v, Page 2-= µ �f t (c), The extension ofuthe Tentative Map fis not y likel to cause public health and safety problems; artd,) (d) The extension is wfthb the time limits prescribed by state law and=local ordinance. 3, Based upon the findings and conclusions et,.frrth in paragraphs1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time,Extens.ion for: Parcel MaP &Rj can4 Exairation 11311 Paul Des Maria3 2 1942 — t May 4 The Secretary tc this Commission. shall "certify"' to the Adoption of this Resolution, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 101TH DAY OF JUL°1 1991_ PLANN114G COMM1SSIGP OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONt;A7 BY ; Larry e , a rman ATTEST.- ',ra-d Isuler"ecretary rt I. Brad Bull er,'`Secretary of the P%nning Commi 4fO of tM City of Rancho Cucamonga, do, he!Tby cartiiy that- the fog n Resolution was duly and regularly introdu.,r:r ;asset:,.,,and adopted by,-oe PI anning,:Commission of the City of Rancho CucidAnga, at a regular meeting o0;the Planning Commission held on the loth dart of wily 1991, by th6k l owing vote-to-wit: AYES: INERS:" NOES: COW,11, 1ONERS ; ABSENT: C(A'.I SSI2WRSt _ \t - - 5� ,`. — _. Q7o . :02 DULY 10 T991 P.C. Ca NDA � 2 o 9 CITY.OF RANCIIQ WCAMONG� STAFF REPORT DP_TE: July 10, 1991 /1 TO: `Chairman and 'i$embers. of the Planning Commission - FROM. Brad Bu_1er, Cit y Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner. SUBJECT: TIME` EXTENSION FOR VESTING TEN!fATIVF. 'TRACT 13890 HOMESTEAD A request £,or an extension of a previously approved vesting tentak,Five tract map consisting of 166 single family lots G` 40 acres of. land in the Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre),. Iccat�d on the north side of Highland Avenue, south of Banyan and west of Deer Creek Channel. APN: 201-271-13, 14, :33, 34,- 41, and 42 and Lot "O +' c. I. BACKGROUND.. Vesting Tentative Tract 13890 was originally approved on June 8, 1988, and would have expired cmf June 8, 1990. A one-year Time Rxtension •was approved by the Vi nninq Commission on July 11, 1990. According to the Development Cffde, extensions for a Tentative Tract Map may be granted in tweIvo-mgnth increments, not to exceed five years from the original .ate c.� approval. Therefore, the applicant may request additional time extensions extendinm- the Tentative -Tract Map until June 8, 1993. The appli-..ant is currently requesting a one-year Txme Extt-hsion to expire on June 8, 1992. Phases 1 and 2 of the Tract have been recorded and ar"• under construction 'while, Phases 3 and •;4* have L not yet !pI�tained recordation because , of difficulty in obtaining the necessary easements to complete the deign for banyan Avenue. II. ANALYSIS: Staff analyzed the proposed Time Extension and compared the proposal` with the development criteria outlined in the Development Coda. Based on this review, the project meets most of the development standards of the Low Medium Residential District. At the time of approval for Vesting Tentative°Tract 13890, side yard setbacks for the Low Medium, Dirhrict were"�5 feet on each ' side. Since the date of original approval, the Development Code has been'amended to increase side }'�iii setbacks in this district to 5 and 10 feet. The applicant, however �bas vesting rights with this applicationand the old setbacks o="4 feet on each side sail apply. ` The subdivision conforms to .all lot width and area r -requirements. i7 ITEM D is i - PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TE FOR V'IT 13890 ` -"HON€STEAD f 0 i July 10" 1991 r Page 2 It should, alsci bell noted that because of the:»?4 fic�Xlty\\ in obtaining the necessary easements to complete Banyan AvenSt� t' at the alignment:may h_ave to be altered. If this is the case, is the possibility that I'D s may be loot in Phase 3 becW-, , ��t he southward realignment, or Banyan' Avenue. I£ this occur= Engineering Division,4 as nAiE d(that a modified Tentative Tracic,i would 'have to be processed:'{I (If this occurs, then vesting right# for this phase would be lost. / III- CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been tadvertised as(�Q public hear i ry'the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaFer,'�-he project been postedf, and, notices were sent to all property owners witLf 300 feet of the project_site. IV. RECO MMENDATION:.� Staff zecommends that the Planning .Commission approve a one-year :Tire itension for Vesting ,Tentetive�Jract 13890 through adoption of the attached,Resolution. f,. Reaps su d, -1 j jf /Brad ler \3 Cit Planner i ,+ r BB:BN:mlg „ Attachments: ?.xnibit "A" - Letter(7rom Applicant? "Exhibit "B'� - Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Site'Utiliaation Map r7 P_esolution No. 88-110 Resolution-Nc. 90-93 Resolution of Approval Ask �II I� G HZ+nsaker&Associates Rive,-side/Sara Betwardino,Irc. ® Planning•Engineering•,'arveying•GP,S CITY OF KAM;m dtlQAMONG. June 3,r1991„ 'r'` " W.O. 622-13890 City..of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rc: REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.13890 On behalf of Homestead Land Development Company, we are malting a formal request for a Second Time Extension on Tentative Tract Map No. 13890, approved by the Planning Commission on June 8, 1988. At the same time, we aa:alang a request for a time extension on tL,.. Design Review Approval associated with TTA �890'which was approved by the Plmuiing Commission on August 9, 1988. : Per your requirements,we have enclosed a$62.00 filing fee. If there are any questions,please call me at.(714)889-2222. I Very truly yours, HUNSAKER&ASSOCIATES Riverside/San Bernardino,lite. __! , F Stephen G.McCutchan, AICP Vice President cc: Chris Taylor,Homestead 4 R.A. 732 E Ca�tegie Drive.-San Bernardino, CA92408 (714,;;d89-2222•FAX.•(714)36f�333� O,Qicesr Riverside/San Bernardino-Im ne•Sari Diego Doug gouse i Cee Anderson Bruce Bunsaker•Steue McCutchan a o -- - as i - t • r.-' ice`.f. ; .. - ENL— J. Nt- CITY C 1RANCHO TITLE: M EXHIBIT- /�, SCALE:_ AN t t5l I I rr sus. Par r iTrime�" ME UTILIZATION MAP PA Lu 71 - \ MH i 'M CITY OFl C b Tft'i.E: ti.?1Ld2—s�tyt�J Pi.ANNl1VG DtvMNHiur. A ALE: RESOLUTION NO. 88-110 A' RESOL'UTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13890 LOCATED SOUTH OF BANYAN, uRTH OF HIGHLAND AND WEST OF'DEER CREEK CHANN'cL IN THE-MEDIUM AND LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. = APN: 201-271, 13, 14, 33, 34, 41, 42 AND LOT I'D" A. Recitals. { ) Acacia Construction has filed an application for the approval "of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 13890 as described in the title of this Resolution_ Hereinafter in this,Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 8th of June 1988 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to :rthe adoption of tfris Resolution have occurred. C:r? B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE..!, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of(the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This'Commis sion hereby specifically finds that.all of the fa,�ts set forth in the Recital;, Part A,-'of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented -to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 8 1988 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Cortarssion hereby specifically finds as follows: ; . (a) The application applies to property located on the south side of Banyan, north of Highland with a,;�street frontage of_;,1060 feet along Banyan,; and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is Chaffey College the property to the south of that site is vacant and is designated for the Route 30 Freeway, the property to the east is Deer Creek Channel and the . property to the -west is designated for single family residential in the northern portion and multi-family residential along the southern portion. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specify„? findings" of 4' facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: ,nt .' IV PLANNING`COMMISSIO. ESOLUTION;`NO. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13890 June 8, 1988 Page 2 (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,; and',specific. plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Qlan., �`, Development. Code, and specific:plans;, and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of j` --development;proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to =cause substantial environmental damage -and avoidable injury to .humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and- (f) The design of the tentative tract 'w.lI not conflict with any, easement acquired by the public at large,f�now of record, for access through or use of the :yroperty within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission' hereby finds and certifies that the project h�.s' been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California, Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition ',et forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto acid incorporated herein by this reference. Vesting Tentative Tract. Nap 13890 I. An in-lieu fee.as contribution to the future under-2rounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical and telecommunication) located on the northsies of Highland Avenue_ shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final map, The fee shall be one-half the city adopted unit amount times the Length of the project frontage. 2. Improvements . to Lemon Avenue shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City;En.gineer as follows': a. 0btain necessary right-of-way and construct full width Pik improvements `along the east project boundary extending to Highland Avenue. l_? 3 PLANNING COMMISSiO. ESULUTI0M'No. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13890 June 8, 1988 Page 3 b. Ttre developer shall make a good faith effort- to acquire slope easements from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and Caltrans and 'if .he,should fail to do so, the developer shall construct retaining walls at the right-of- way line. _ 3. Banyan Street shall be constructed- and dedicatedfull width, including community equFstr"ian,;trail. 4. The'"necessary dedications and improvements for Highland Avenue shall be provided to the satisfaction of *;he City Engineer as. follows a. Full,street, improvements shall be constructed from Tract 12952 to the west to tact 13057` to the east including the widening.,of the bridge over Deer Creek Channel. b. The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursements as follows: (1) System development fees for all work within the Deer Creek Channel right-of-way if approved ;by the City Council'. If not <lpproved by the Council, ttse requirement for the work within the Deer Creek Channel right-of-way shall be waived. -(2) He nay request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of improvements fronting the vacant parcel (APH 202-211-39), i'ocated an the south side of Highland Avenue, upon said parcels; development. The improvements shall include pavement to 44 feet north of the south curb line. a (3) He may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of 4mprovements fronting the SBCFCD property:, to the east V'Y,both Lemon and Highland Avenues. S. .,The final 'location of the storm drai i easement within Lot 14 shall be determined prior to final map approval to the satisfaction of the CiLy,,Engineer based on the relocation of the manhole in connection with Tentative Tract 13823 located to the r west: 6. „Slopes located witltin City landscape easements' along Lemon' -Avenue shall be a Qkimum of 3:1 and shall be.landscaped to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7.; The portion of plaster Plan Storm brain Line No. 3-K shall be constructed from Deer Creek Channel to the east `.tract boundary. ` A debris basin shall be ,provided at ,the westerly; inlet or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The �f developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of the cost of, j - construction per City Ordinance No. 75: PLANNING COMMISSIO.' ESOLUTION V0-. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13890 J June 8,,.1988 Page 4 _ 8. The development shall be protected fron flows entering the project from the north as generally shown in the preliminary drainage report to the satisfaction of the City Engineer."," ir 9. Prior to final map approval, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 86-2 among the newly created lots. 10. A storm drain. system shall be provided to, convey flows from the ^, Lemon and Highland Avenues intersection to Deer Creek Channel. The system shall be,sized to accommodate the future development of the San Bernardino County. Mod' Control, District pr-aperty to the east. Design `Review".. 1. The perimeter wall shall be compa' i bl a and cony`" 'pnt with Tract D2873 to the west t When the wall is cons.ru, i, itsshall:be 'desi geed to mi'Mmi ze any potential double wall,_,,l l*re'locatl on, or grade differential cc.:flicts that may result with",the project to the west when it is constructed. This shall be indicated on the final landscape plan which^;tail be reviewed and approved by the City Planner,` 2.. 'ThE rear wall of)'Lot 1 sh;ll be inset approximately 15 feet from the property 11iie and shall intersect the,corner side yard wall at an approxi'mat� 30 degree angle. The same treatment shall apply to Lot 52. The resultant triangular of land adjacent to the curb shall be annexed; into a landscape Maintenance District. .This shall be indicated •-.n the final landscape plan which shall'be reviewed:and approved-oy the City Planner. 3. The Banyan Avenue Parkway shall be expanded to 35'-feet at the eastern tract bourdary ._ 4. Architectural material utilized' on front elevations shall,be brick veneer, "flintstone" " and granite splitface" as Specifically' approved by tFe Design Review Committee. This shall be noted on the final plait which�-jhall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. Should river rock bey'Iu3ed,'it :shall be of a natural srtone material. 5. Architectural detailing shall be provided on all elevations and shall consist of the following: two by four stucco trim around second story windows on all elevations and a two by four stucco "belly band on side and -rear elevatons of two story models. One story models shall be provided with stucco detailing around sliding glass doors and windows on the rear, and side) <F elevations. This shall be noted on the final plans and reviewer-- and approved by the City Planner. PLANNING COMMISSION. RESOLUTION NO, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13890 ` June 8,'"1988 Page 5 ))) 6. The Jui'lder -shall construct to se tans a P pp�oved with the Vesting Tentative Tract Map or a ,building type in substantial a� compliance to those plans as 'approved by the Design Review (' Committee. 1 7, All return fences/walls in l pub7is view shall be decorative in nature and subject to approval by the Design Review Committee, Said fenceshwalls shall be indicated on the final landscape plans. 8. Lots adjacent to the Medium-High Residential project to the west are to_ be screened from it with a dense planting of;evergreen trees along, the eastern side of the perimeter wall. This, as well ass a permanent irrigation system, shall be noted on the final landscapeplans which shall be reviewed and approved bythe City Planner. '4+ 9. The tieputy" Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED..AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE 1988. PLANNING CPWISSIOK>Oh THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P BY: Larry hal rman ATTEST: r uTlx7peputy Wretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing 'Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of June 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: ' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, .CHITIFA, MCN`!E NOES:' COMMISSIONERS: NONE ASSENT: r COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, TOLSTOY Alm ��1b 1� 6iY6C y�YG O� : Y� GO L�f Oqyyq I�gMI� LOS. yy a L1 CC 9r0 �bryun •0.L 0 CI =t � ti a•��4yi° _ Y ��YO� OY°A-.pYY 9 ii {yLe gc_ CYrL Y�•� O `5 C Vy « LY yY 0 6 W uYa>u 4•-�.�. Yuw.�� 4.S �U� Yam, YC. Y s'�>rS:ri s 4• Sca YCC��a{Li�_Y YY Olf 1. y iS 8.�S vr.rl^° c��Q� $aoiy.0 iYr`sa..: o5}I.§ c �S.�.t•J• be i19�tl•'�. «v a °8vq u -EQ ga= ed i gitla dqu . « 0-.3 = �� B'8g;; � p y `6 gsYyw.�y'2d ,: yOgyYpffi �wX N" Y �ptl..° ... o y32-X-, c 1 1 o °' r Y2Spw.y4Y +— 4222 . Y4 �y AI- Y11•y ��CY�y,}re■��`�Y 3 M'Yy C> OE� Y,Y pwg 9.tl�.4 3��•e ay �so.i y�pi O MD•g �tlC C Y_. My VO I i.G:N y LS` ypY NiA a S.Yz iqa• � ZO.q� GBL.�Y d r I Ah .8 w • r 3 N C Us—N O \`� C.0 log V tl b Y N IL sum A_ `♦a i ra�pSYy92r w G is V da+i g «tt777j{{{y V j Q® Y '� toyp 'P My. , 75 fe•.gYq�S�V c1 c 0. Vy / 1.1 ® 6 i0 Oa�MO Ni O�iN 'i � tl ~ `�y r t•j N ii b oR1`o to t�I ca« G •y._ 3u M.�rd-Cece o a ar.-e- oy,�. �Y >_� a I .0u � r3AMk + A. A.* ..o ��4 b� .r't Yw « oar u a c o- ^�� -�oL'n� 'ds..a•� uMe aLi si'ri�� a$ i/ b' q CCN C ppy�C{��.y yp " 'aL Ae�yVN. �p�y$y$■■. S �Q OO �Y^ vyCN RYL. • qM Off.§?�L� PV��N l� GY �a 6Y SR; \). `roc �gQc = Mqa=$w b � ls`Jd r. le } A . 1,1155► Ygort Yr�gs c P� ' � gNS 'all$a$[ HIS .^ .Q�3 N w.S U . ��1d=3 :l� l�n a Yili Snn l ��!R $ � Vo... S6.i.'.w $$'H j_14,uI 13 TL ��^3 �'� sr:$s enu. Y3 v gd^n �3� $ 3 G3 _ os 8�3MNNN`ZN1 `rY uA IS J v'Yi �r.> Mp� 5.,; —� MMNYe- N� _��kC 43yo �` �� !- a... $= '�x,s_1 w5Vf Nt:.s33 gLlaaa : 6 la21la a ¢ _ Ns b• S Yy 6■ Ci SY�^a$ Na ��.�l.�Y "3 la !- o ri t es Y L Y. S.v�i. 3.2 1 Wli sw3 M ! d_. r:� �- ��- O !^ Rs aN ! b3a- J�=6 �1 s cQ _V.�� `OOy ,�1 Q& 6 M :I> s- Oiyp� 2 IL eL- y!tle !1 4. CtC, q iic.-If de� PY z -A w "wYs ®yam ggY$@@3� `d @anyy .,; C.T,%'a +»C, X0 tl n21, yys �3• a3 ytl Y e N► -a fA Vr!= 0 Y R��j�y `Y>Q.a Y ep.V 4�.MC O �M(► 3s w> 01Cy yvwwQQGG4 O@ L{wtl�i�N Y��CY L Y"NNN 0.9 yYy Y YA GEC+e.Cy r• `_:N C. N1f AV S®� mV M6.Sa .34 1. a > n U =• N u .. �.�aa,: cuo� C 4 L i y�r z V�/ .y �' �N Y C •� O.p W.y �YCC & tee N - L OC� �a ZV da Chr...� •4V� O. ON. tw.C40.1 SOOMw'. �a� •�~O � ►�M9 M T�\� $ �� V.O V O10 Y.4 V 0�.d fy6'�� w yOS.�.Yak : '�d� > ■ .r ��r �.,` tV�p,GYS «..N� cc r q O C••w 4CL 4�� I V ~ w COMN.Y j.NC VY� =' •�Y C L _ep 4 C •r r� � CC ,yp N yO�L^ OIUOL 94p. 'L �� L N�Y •=`�LN Yi 'r .n_'+'�. NC •� �o� oy IL 4iV at;eVy N,gYy,« 4':i y,fis' • $ 62 iS" Y N .E`Beg N`y t I E eu Ti ^« N Y 4�.:N •Y Y CCO� ~ O.Y� ��� c ����tt �� im � �LN]!a�{3 CI O`O� ��� .p^ ml '''CCV4l� •� M.Q.� 2yS N-� u oN'cu L g �N� ■wt� % .§�"F , MY My "cam N�N�M {Y� lN� nYfl 1 4 4Vo uC oC Y �. xLlu oag g= .RoL Y w 333y Snag s- 0t2�a Z� 4g $ G 2.2 _C SY.` Y�y c4 33 I a L■a t`/ _i y a s jk •N� 4- 0 all— p yy•"a _s N� . • a.. �tlap _,. gr$, ► g age CLr Cr N LRL 1ppj qs R� N A.00 is 4 rN 'M�r.V •psNM L` Y•s= ' w2 E"V LV Ty®*' �� �g��. �*g § a^VO+n01'V bM■C y0v 60 sNs A •YOy `• O N M C.�6NCC,�V4 _ 3 ' 3 V Y �a !Y y 4 N Y Y Y •. > V L M M=sa yy y_■■_ On 4 4►�«• ��� V O� Aa. Cp x r, ►O Nam.• C c 1.M.� yz ppyy vi 44 IIJ� yyy Y yyCC 9 ■■yy V uZ!y�� Y V rt�lai $Nyg ►r-;$ HI' � $ •fix: nA a � S� rope¢ �j �� ry u �� �` ■�� � yw yy uC , C Z YS y p+ + 4Y �CpO4G. �a eOpL� Y- s R ytM �iY� : jO rp Y: Hal �i.�� Y CP� C.�CC1M3i O� �S�1 VIY• '���� t V E N�V rVCY �Y -S � +ry i■I C:iS�. YY„�y: — �� - E�p + — gA �$� DES m = I3 w Nji wS'Y' 04" .wp.Cy� . 3 uy Y y VV V p r y a, G Y L y�y O ®L G y r w• `.4,11 V 6{s{��VV �1CC40a Syy`aSa �pY gJ ry. . �Y�My�i pr _ 4ViK.YS 311►N� ���. r 1`�, W b.5.'K W � '=i• N >r_ N Y • G �V S. i p N ram. ci i a y Z w rt M L au �r� ay q�ai w asp : a.. y� ,CCwc`. ■! O o r +a� O i rasa' = �ve A :4.y ar_s- �- w yVd aM YLiY�� � � �p rLr �p.fi` � Y•$�.g �� w_�A �� �w SJ 4:� Jd i Y- 83 ��^h:! �'�i.4r0p � � 'O �rw Lei+■kM � Y�� � p� e,��� L� "'v0 OO�wti 6 r oV RAY ��w Y.^sy♦ V O..y. Y wyAY Y 7 ay�110 i CP. C _y� ova icy VV—. hit �p V C C V � Cpp� C.�iY� C '�•Q NG: �:� N6 �N�_. �M=.pC w+.:.. N'C V p G 4 `4 y M 4.�a Occt O L .V�r •_ 9i t G�� �M L ^+9,OC fi �. C 'tom L C!T' w•. YO iM �� _V CC.� _N vvL wpp L_t �L pY 4r M �.at q�<�1�' < �.S=.Isi ra• LOVM V i0 �Cw� yy I aII o Hm us�t7sems. aa' " _ "ys b abLs � `= VO e Y ■4C�... �.�q:.. 8 V• �S��O p� b« L W I Sn w Y R L i C a Q y tl _L a�c iw�y is y O1 ``�« V\B O G O®ii C « N, • Y o> iL1 L y. V C'q¢/i .C as � .oil se = �� „� s S _q;;Zvi WaAV Qa V0U Y�y.M :y. M 1110000 gy� �xx p yw. gLy6 S: 10, dam '" 0�-.. gr ,,.•.�o@_.� `.. a sax ®3 mid if i �p YyL® cogs op9qT o.gadw ` V S V L L K r V®V C H � zl L� �p � oYd _� y$a Me L � ��5� $'oc� .•..si�v L y y c• 4 VS� r = tlO W �.00 iayye L• y � gp�y>pp ;Y � Yy y -co V yyb >9 T yy gO�c Ali® l h Y-U ®Y F ®� e• S S :Y tl��O .`O«q L®� e�atll V 41 .2e yg, 0.. « o U;- aLV `l-g01 ...� 8S. 2 Np y go =_q rg• � _i « M_L OS- So a06 w7p I qe eS a4V OY>�.rcy1`yOY y�! _ �"O'Vl�� M•aQ OL«VS erw VVV r Vu _�6 tL90 O.9 r ♦ Y :Y <01y !'_M. q • O� i� f� a ` coX. a x = Y y '.,�. xtj YO Y—'Y yAL4 L. g 4 �. VABq q q.Q• I 4 r su w s YNC 7C . C�.s �' � ,�*� 4 �N c� a9 4r�Q wV Q�y �Y e���y` � E 6s yyyVy pp i ±.�1x0 y� �xp y yr uw��P»= �tl. CN U �. -YY 0yy. ^CW- VOI .Z;C yi �.wY A 60 y.0 O ^�..�• QS.. L U. , �yY8= ° e aoY ` YY uIy L L !Nb\ » i,Ll� 8$7� ■fig ei .Y� g e r` - —A _ $v v�'`. '? - r ^+ T A • Y a®� Y O^y Cq 8 ii— a y Y O Y eq Yp N os« �W C,^ CV.Vgvu� �� �et1_N.+F roar rry oc•y N� �$ Ewa u`as. i» $"� 'Y�'� 3 ,+e Q `. +S� I, �w ,L. YMq ol`05.iv`, ES—Heu i O I. YmY �..Y I.i Y y. y �Q1 0 0 f.'-.+,.L Y C•y 6 Y -,. y Y V u F ovf � eAY fJ�A 6N Y Y.t. C` V m O 01 eNo 04L p t- .o Lai IL e so Sa V i Y LY" s 13 to- I S N w emu$ C =Z�y „s C,q6 23, v41!p L y O�Y i ��y e 4 C ^t 5 pyW cv goa rs. c e �a a� ran e A O �f Jos ��d w ow O r 0 4.8 $a5 i 1 iyet u'v. R .°w :�. ems: _oo p tl'rs d j 6® N _ ^Y M w V V o•. �`�1 d Maq4:y: N w tog V ...d . �• O O..VN Po Eppd_N Vi I. � j i � fay im p 6t0��. `6'�yf <GOCN a� qp y W _p� � �V V V.— y+ �1 tl99` 'Ovil �V'af ai yyby.. ® O.{p. Zs ' p q.E 4p x\ 0. C+O p.�1 `�1Y.1lf y L W& 9.-V Cyr M C YL Vv 6• w ~y. r�a� +oC L r0'1y J .,wo p1. Y C.t 1f C C. - ieY fi Y'.S N Y � 1� qq S pM .�L I! w4 ;u MG.O s h61 10 � 01�a �.rC �Y■l � g y {{1� �•�11 W GSS3 s T .!`�i0,. 7•�u `�VQ �`V`NA �_ NtII�C mV.. 0 �V O:y w ~S Nn �w 4 L 4 1.Da C .r of fCf�� 4 .ygyp i..�.yam:.. C6•r <m 0 ....V_ YaY.. 0V V.� O.O K� _ <W OwsM r9 � <0 �.� 0.+tei CMi iClb CLw.G of N V N o RESOLUTION NO 9U-93 A RESOL`ITION" OF tTHE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,' CALIFORNIA, 'APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION AND ADDING A CONDITION OF,APPROVAL FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13890`CONSITIN'(3' OF 166 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 40 ACRES OF 'LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM;RESIDENTIAL,DISTRICT " (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE),, hOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE', SOUTW OF B414YAN AND WEST 077 THE DEER CREEK CHANNEL, AND MATING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT YAREOF``- f. = A?N 201-271-13, 14, 33, 34, 41, 42 AND LOT "011. Recitals (i)- Homestead Development has filed an ,zppli;catipn for the extension of Vesting Tentative Tract 13890 as, _;described it , the title of this Resolution. lierei naf ter, in th,1 Res, uti on, the;' u+ cc Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On June 8, 1988, this Commie_-ion:adopted its Resotutiin No. 88- 110 thereby approving, subject to sP jf'rc conditions land time limits, Vesting Tentative Tract 13890, and issued a.,►,egttive Declaration. '(iii) On May 4, 1990, the applicant filed a requtist for a 12 month time extension. . (iv) On July 11, 1990, he Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly not public hear,im on the appl -zation and concluded"said hearing on that date. 0) All legal prerequisites pH or to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby 'found, deterfained, and'resIV_-d by the Planning Commission of the City of,Rancho Cucamonga as follows: . 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all C the facts-, set forth in the Recitals, :Part A, of this-Resolution are:true and correct. . 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on duly :fit, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public t."stimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The previously approved Vesting Tentative trap is ; in substantial compliance with the City°s current General Plan and Development Code, D v19 PLANNING COMMISSION 1. 0LUTION NO. 90-93 TIME EXTENSION/CONDITIONS FOR VTT 13840 - HOMESTEAD, July 11,_199Q ^; Page 2 i b. The extension of'the Vesting Tentative,Map will .not cause significant inconsistencies with the,;current General P!an'.and Development - "ode. C. The extension oa the Vesting Tentative Map',is not likely to cause public health'or safety problems;;and d. The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state _law and local ordinance. 3., Based upcn the``findings and conclusions"set forth in,paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Cofnmi'ssion'hereby approves the application�subJect,to each and every, condition set forth belnwi' t� 1. All Conditions of Approval as contained in Planning Comnissi'on Re olution,No: 88=110, shall apply. /`_p 2. Apprcvaf siaF expire on June 8, 1991, unless ;{ ' extended by the Planning,Commission 3. Prior-to the`rerordation -of •the final` map or 'the, issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the e,pplicant shall,:,consent to, or participate in, the establishment, of aMello=Roos: a,,Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide, in conjunction with the applicable School District, for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities: However, if Any'School District has previously established such a'"Com unity Facilities District, then,applicant shall, in ,the alternative, consent to the annexation of:_the project site into the terrlitory �? such existing District prior to. the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. rA, Further, if the afferted School . District has not ' Y formed'•a Mello-Roos Facilities District within 12 months of the date of,"approval;;of the time extension and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuanca of building permits for said projectf: ;this condition3hall be deemed null and void. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolwu ion. ` -Tor PLANNING COMMISSION ,SOLUTION N0. 90-93 TIME EXTENSION""/,CONDUITIONS FOR VTT 13890 - HOMESTEAD July 11, 1990 Page 3 tr '! APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH'DAY OF JULY 959P PLANNING CO 11SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA�' f C f BY: arry c ze ,�Cha n ATTEST: =1 ra u re ar Brad Buller, Secretaryof. the Planning C'ommisson of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, `do hereby cef ti fy that the forgoing Resolution was duly an,d regularly introduced, pa{,sed, and''adoptEd" by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,1 at regular meeting of the Planning Coitntission =held on the Iith day of July, 9910 the"following vote-to-wit:, AYES: COMMISSION€RS: CHITIEA,;MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER NOES COMMISSIONERS: lq3 E ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE X , I ai r. k l w i RESOLUTION NO., y t7_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNINGt COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ' t RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A.TIME EXTENSION FOP. VESTING TENTATIVE 'TRACT NO. 13890 CONSISTING OF 166 SINGLE FAMILY LOTIS ON 40 ACRES OF',LAND IN THE LOW'' MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 'DISTRICT, (4-6- DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), 'LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE;OF HIGHLAND 'AVENUE,-' SOUTH OF BANYAN AND WEST OF THE DEER CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-271-13, ` 14, 33, 34, 41,' 42 AND LOT A. Recitals a l� ( ) "Homestead Development has filed an appacation for the extension }` of Vesting 'Tentative Tract No, 13890 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." . >{; (ii)" tm June 8, 1988,�}this Commission° adopted its. Resolution No.`-88-110 ther`eby�approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Vesting Tentative Tract No. 13890, and issued a Negative Declaration. (iii) On July 11, 1990, this Commission. adopted its Resolution No. 90-93 thereby approving a one-year time extension for Vesting Tentative Tract 13890. i (iv) On June 3, 1991, the applicant filed a request for a twelve-month time extension. (v) On July, 10, 1991,, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that'date. (vi) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. r B. Resolution. 0 NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby foun.f determred, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of.Ranchc Cucamonga as follows: 1. This;Commission herety specifically find" that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of•.this Resolutio7 are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, during the above-referenced public hearing on July 10, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, this Commissi�n'he`;eby specifically finds as follows: (a) The previously approved Vesting Tentative ?Map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General P1an,,and Development Code; and Y� :i PLANNING.COMMISSION RESOLU'iION NO. TE FOR VTT 13890 HOMESTEAD July 10, 1991 Page 2 . (b);\ , extension of the Vesting Tentative Map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General. Plan, ar.d Development Code; and (c) The :extension of the Vesting Tentative;Map is not likely to causepublic health and safety problems; and (d)" The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approvesthe application subject to,each and every condition set forth below: 1) All I Cond$.tions of Approval as contained .in '1 Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-110 { , shall apply. 7 2) All Conditions of .Approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 90-93 shall apply. 3) Approval shall expire on' June 8, 1992, ,unless extended by the Planning Commission, 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to, the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED-'THIS 10>"'H DAY OF JBLY 1991. fj ., PLANNING COMMIPI-1,TPN OF THE CITY OF ',RANCHO CUCAMONGA i BY: Larry T. McNiel,'Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the -foregoing Resolution,was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of July 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES. COMMISSIONERS: NOES:. COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �w fly CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA., STAFF REPORT DATE: July 10, 1991. TO. Chairman"and'Membersi of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad/,,Buller, city P`;anner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME E7CTENSION FOR 'DESIGN REVIEW FOR VESTING TP.NTATIVE TRACT 11B90 - HOMESTEAD - A request for an extension of a 111 previously approved design review of building, elevations and detailed sij;e plan fnr 91 lots (Phases 1 and 2) of a vesting �tent;.-i3ve tract map consisting of 166 single "zanily lots on 40 acres of land in the Low McUum Residential District (4-8 dwelling .units .,per acre), located on the north side of Highland Avenue, south of Banyan and Nest of Deer Creek Channel - APN: 201-271-13, 14, 33, 34, 41, and 42. I. BACKGROUND: The Design Review for Phases, 1 �832 of Vesting Tentative Tract 13890 was 'originally approved by the Planning Commission on August. 9, 1989, to".expire on August 9, 1991. The applicant is rcurrently requesting a one-year Time Extension to expire on Auc Est 9, -----T1xovisions of the Development Code allow for ti: 1 extensi=n 'in twelve-month increments, not to t exceed five ea .t y from the on inal date of approval. 9 PP II. ANALYSIS: Stair tnalyzed the proposed Time Extension and compared it with the � .rrent development criteria outlined in the Development Code.'Iy Based on this review, the project meets most of the development A-andards of the Low Medium Residential District. At the time rproval for Vesting Tentative Tract 13890, side yard setbacks `for the Low Medium District were 5 feet'.ion .each side. Since t�e date of original approval, the Development Code \, has been amended to increase side yard setbacks in the Low Medium District to 5 and 10 feet. The applicant, however, has vesting rights with this application`and the original setbacks of 5 feet on each side still' apply. The applicant has, in most instances, proposed side yard setbacks well in excess of the minimum requirement. if ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TE FOR DR OF VTT 13890 - HOME°TEAR July 10, 1991 ' Page 2 III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a one-year Time Extension for the Design Review for Phases J,, and 2 (91 lots) of Vesting Tentative Tract 13890 through adoption of the attached Resolution. A y sub e 13 raTner 1 �5 BB:BN:mlg ( J� Attachments: Exhibit ^A^ - Letter from Applidar`t !7 Exhibit "B" -,Tract Map l� Exhibit "C^ -,Situ Utilization Mag Resolution No. 89-106 Resolution of Approval IW �a if .. Hunsaker&AssociateS Riverside/San Bernardino,Inc. Planning-Engineering•Surveying•GPS CITY OF nANCMo June 3 1991 1 y WA.622-13890 - -,.� ifs City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department v 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA K730 Re REQUEST FOR TIRE EXTENSION TENTATWE T,_AGT MAP NO,1 890 On behalf of Homestead Land Development Company, we are malting a formal request for a Second Time Extension on Tentative Tract Map No. 13890. approved by the Planning Commission on Tune 8, 1988. At the same time, we a making a,`, nest for a time extension ' on the.Design Review Approval associated with TTM 13890 which was approved by the Planning Commission on August 9, 1988. Per your require ents, we have enclosed a$62.00 filing fee. If there are any questions,please call me at(714) 889-2222. Very truly yours, , ,, HMNSAIER&ASSOCIATES =- Riverside/San Bernardino,Inc. r �k a Stephen G. McCutchan,AICP Vice President cc: Chris Taylor,Homestead « Apt 732 R Carnegie Drive•San Bernardino,CA92408;T (7141 889 2222•FAX.-(714)381;3.590 Offices Riverside/Sun Bernardino-fnrre•San.Diego Doug Crouse•Lee Anderson•Bruce Hunsaker•SteveMGCuichan sire_• t — r 1 � d*. - .� a�wa or lam.w..� JL- ♦LaUs erC .. +_a,�f a'r��� i %",..aaa..y NORTH CITY ' RAC C" I _k TTTLE::Zjcf Mao RAINNING DWSMEX tlKT SCALE- TRACT `Tarr.n i- '= NO- 13890 j SITE UTILIZATION MAP - , (Nat Rec©rdei 2, .,try `i_ a � ` �~•, Z-1-�LM ' -- CITY OF JJRA.L M T!'ItE PLA:�iNIN DIv' 1 � EXHINT: A j , It it RESOLUTION NO. 89-106 r A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR PHASES 1 AND 2 OF VESTING ' -- - TERTATIVE..�TR/, - .-NOr13890- STING—DE.-LOLTS 1.-65 AND 141-166 ON �-i0 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM DISTRICT LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND :AVENUE, SOUTH-OF BANYAN, WEST OF DEER CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 201-271-'3, 14, 33, 34, 41 AND 42. A. Recitals. (i) Homestead Development has filed an applicatiem-for the Design Review of Tract, No. 13890 (Phases 1 and 2) as described fn the t.tle of"this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On August 9, 1989, the Planning Commissvn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application: (iii) All legal prii`"C�jisites to the -adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, "r is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission 6reeby specifically finds that all `of, the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this. Resolution are true: and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this: Commission during the above-referenced meeting on August 9, 1989, including written and- oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as fo.1lows; A. The. the proposed project is consistent with the cbjectives of the General Plan, and B. TlWt the n,vposed design is in accord with the objectivE'of the D6elopment.Code and the purposes of the district in which the_i,i1�e is located; and -� C. That the proposed'design is in compliance with ear,' of toe applicable provisions_ of the Development Code; and 0. That the proposed design, together with the'° conditions - applicable thereto, will not be detrimental " to the pub?c health, safety-, of welfare, or ra�teriaily injurious to propertiesAM ik or `. improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION ' -SOLUTION NO. 89-106 i.ZVTT. 13890 - HOMESTE: August 9, 1989 Page 2 1p 3. Based upon thp/ findings and conclusions set forth'in paragraphs YJ and.2overtk�iss -t�a hersbapproyes-thy iyation sum teach and every condition set forth below and in the ;,attac ed Standard Conditions,`F attachea hereto and inc or rated herein'by this reference. 'f,! >` Planning Division; 1) The front yard setback' on Lots 52 shall be J; increased 5 to"6 feet. 0 2) Driveway widths at the public right-of-way shall,,. . be reduced where possible. 3) Planter, areas shall be. provided in driveway,,, �) between the 1-car and 2-car portions of the r. ; garage. 4) The freeway sound wall shall be consistent with that which has been ;provided for Tract'�13823 to the west. Pilasters with a decorative cap shall (� be located between Lois 17 and 18 and between Lots 20 and'-'.1, and at property boundaries. 5) Return Wall shall bp of a stucco material and may f' be ?ffset at the_,property line. ' Some type of pilaster may ba located at the property line, 6) The perimeter wall' shail be compatible and consistent with Tract 12873 to�tkie west. When ; the wall is constructed, it shall tle designed to, minimize any ;potential double wail; wall relocation, or grade differential conflicts that may; result with the_project to the west when it is constructed. This shall be, indicated on the ' final landscape plan which shall`3e reviewed and approved by the C4ty Planner. -I 7) They rear wal l 4of -Lot 1 -Thal 1 ba �� et, approximately 15 feet from the property line'.and shall intersect the corner side-yard w 11 at an I approximate 30 degree angle. Ine same treatment shall apply to Lot.52. The resultaEt` triangular' of land ad v J eat to the curb shall be annexed into a La4d cape Maintenance District. 'This shat be indicated om the final landscape plan whic ''shall be reviewed and approved by the City �.. Planner and City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISS;I`b'.R S�LUTION-NO. 89-106 VTT 13890- HOMES ;,August.,3, 1989 F `f P age 3' S),All return fences/walls in public view shay be _,decorative in nature and: subject ;to approval by the Design Review Committee. Said fences/walls shall be indicated on the final landscape plans:, 9) Lots adjacent •to the Medium-High Residential s project to the west are to be. screened from it' with a dense planting of evergreen trees along o e: , the astern side of the perimeter wall. This, as well as a permanent' i,rigation system, shall be noted on tW`final landscape plans>which shall be reviewed and approved by the City,,Planner. Engineering Division: 1) The developer shall provide a secondary means of access for Phase III 'from the <northerly termination of "G" Street, to meet existing pavement on Banyan Avenue to the north or Chandon 'Place to the west. 4: The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of,th.is Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TWIS 9TH DAi``•OF AUGUST, 1989. PLANNING CO SSION OF lH EL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY �' (..J� ` Y : arr . cNie airman ATTEST:, Br d du r I n,- r zr l.: I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and reg'u'1arl'y introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Com+nission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a'regular meeting of the Planning .Commission held' on the gth day of August, 1989, by-the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COM!9ISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, UITIEA, MCKEL, WEMBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE > ABSE.;lT: COMISSIONERS: T�°STOY G I �CY_Y.�YOYi Lt ^T c� Y�. NCO LC .Y li 44 Ly N✓w p L 2 43, U V G y t C V'b r uy •T G w •j p 8 V �� cc rY_u ..�N D^''O6Y 40�.S � �UO°y w� y� ^O O•�� VVY {1dw U�r� G- � M�V..i2`^ -,� �Q fps dlG QDLw o L g Y C y C Y Y D V •Y N Q a D a p d V e,C V y0i 1� �f y y 0YD 4 V f u 0u�r ^N M dD ..5, qLD Y w O 9 YB�.Y L-4d�UV 7C C_N Vae .C�!� ON C•�B.N�, .�� i y } � 3 O� dC Y GZ�.O T`. y •A 9 pY4p '�'". 1`�. �C O• O� T �OV O 9 ~O.. 9 lu qp OIG ^ yY AC'. °NsuVpCVp�pn C 3r LYyV' a Mas 1S �i� 6G^GpM1 at Nan. .CV �/ L _ K'6N tN d MLD��� J YaY O L 00 L agGaq��C�if�Y.O N�GN `C pbp0 O.J 04Ld: Yq .yiip. SY C uyyyy.6C YGy.aCr+�: u �M V ° yw0 ♦VL.' CIQ oL. OCurl C� 8 Y'�G�C .y i G N,2 S A? VZZ .t3u:aonH$ aaoow A!u�5. «y//F $`oea� cgE�v u F > t 1 CCY w� N93.L0 r NDtl LL NY Y a Q M" �V! M y gp9ot , p atltl as,f p � a �O q♦ 'per" N y' L.. y♦OQ w ♦q A yA...i1� �l,a°i0 - ®g elle ys y t, C a �. OC p MY♦6 b �g •• y O 4 6�! 4 L N Ri'"A M Gf N 2 el �' V � •@l �� J� .r N wl .f yl N g «�� .oigib' 'u'do*�`o uYp Y`au:Loob ocu Cq�Ya :fig '�.o,'^ cuts N.Y• SCEY^ao s > o ,. b �� a• ZJooN.'`q'C ani a•_ �- $.'",'�` d 6�y� .�bs 00 L�COb.:V CLiA 4 .�'�2 Y YS i'Y N pMyY V V.at+.0" $q Y yjj :;�N`• ..� Y o. p 6y sN C>In .4 �O pLp;� aV.91OY V V,aN 'CrO V ° Mat Yip G ^ LVLb�doyN OAlt:.6 V� VNb V Ny..G` YL C. qOH� uN�L Y�`'q+..6t y.� uyG�'4Crni�� ObZ ^y)b IYC G> yL O•. •_C A C�O V Y a•P V C�..µ�� `C Cyy.,O 9 V' `C� 3 b:d A r. �..V _ .�C N 9 y v N ����� 'I N■ M b C V® C O•Lq r `.�..G L1 G� IS q Sys QY N Y Y O Q `C O N H N V kG S'{y/� a C,._`LL° a' ± C�• qY Y b p q^ R �.C•O> m.�>� w GUT `•Ra�D Y�..ao att�e ��sA peso. V1G.bu Tg� p'GLQ C9 M^ O Y�y�•*mow C'GCCNa 4�m �«YY ZL Cy�.b� • OC V^G $ LO ys �w��. M.. Y �YB C iYY .�N A n N e^ y�O� N >�.c• Ob� i G 1eVs LiV :,DO L r OI a C b Y Y Y•Y i >byb i C N O 4 Y Lp w 01gp V Y^Z O O� Y9V/pp� _ Ci LG OY��e:. LQY yb:,.'•Vg�ggOy ^L.L'L� ..+RT t g6J O.(6 p(MYY°r0• YE N:IT •M V1.1 .fib Ba.,NN1 W eII CG <L�Y� N^IL G�CC oYC aani C yCO. as YO+LV N... GV�G@ aN4C4Cy OMs Y®v.+ 6M6. -.by iY H. C� Ham.. 6g,.Sr tlC>pp«Yy wtl.N L.. b1�,�e w •+ �� L ZV � C�r•�OM 2.1 N-Cp Y j N^..vV H 7�. V4y. L4®. �M® M6K YM gp N�®? 4y. N a O ` ay.� �Oq Yy —a bggj�6q Os��p2 ��s n ^ry }Vy .3 .1 N.dB 6rs M� ^.R-2 p V VC. KCp" �_�0r•F Y Yu 0 - •'� '3NaV NGL H.g�Yyl. 4a = p•Y OIG 7ia � "$ q. '�/ y�A'q m$..•• a� w.tl�GY ��_'T.,gd� 8�� a. �uV.0pV « VN �fta R®u a.Sq AO m.�0 •N Ar uY -44 V`6 4^eV Y" p V I r I f C D L. M N C a G, `P t p w•M `�Y 6�� • a 4 .f e la C :�t q N ...8 j E s y Wo 1�d =o V' CIg N.F, b<O Opp •F �G M• « �~� di e.EVffi L�Ya � o W pby J4 A.m y ®a ;"V.Q Zug. 6. 6i�" Gl . =o-q� u4'gag p$... LVba�"�p6��� ro ��`�+u.`. AUs �O ►� ® Yy 7 N�O� Q� �S Sip Y��•i Y Ap�CF �GA�N� ba hM M y V IC V V V A4nr tl C.,6e. Grtl tl r yrY WSP �. �. C� tl tl r �Y V,.a IYwG Cr® A� em pr_ OyIC AM= m.�l COV �� E V•� W�Y r V 6 66 L N L 1b g V N x V L D L L L �T O •.JS o f `► V O y ! O !iil 6R V tl L O tl tl cc�io «'a �c:sa i�Y.'e� •"v,e-i. .ay .g5.$o�iN F-S-O .ei Ai5mx,i.. o di0 d r . -D. ,i yy ; $a rna �fr v $.oiu t- �o vuyy oG ®o CY.�. y._ !2= Ea O •�ZO N 4^ �6al� Y- �..-.r 1•v E. �c00 4 OY rOir Y �sYG L YO q* pp Gy' pY•.:• �'� Y4P 4NN Lb�` OP O • y agy p} © C O.N G•r Y •YG _. YO O •. OG No G C C! p t 4 ^J:.. Z7S �. 4 V u 01 } V w M > O h N Y Y 'y 4 V G N C �• w C. Vr' - P �w4 .. y^9. L - LCN 4� +•'•v1 6�00-N Cam^ �,4=N, ey/ Nry4� O V�. 4 6 t G r ..G D� Y • � �4 ^'�O� 'S G N a;C ' i� NL -30 f.1�0CL• � C L{ Y�:by �CNL•.yOp GG Op Yp 2 INC ^N'p fi.. p C,rO LWv ry. NwG Yy. amo$NyI�.Fa tl y... cb y b O =4L• 4 G i..A 9 f) r O OO:ya- V O G i b 'i CEO. Mp. w Y 6N i� L��'5 ON`C.C� ��arE M9 N..O O..b V N V-4. -N`v•- L,.I H GN. V4�4yLV ONdG{�N�` C�^�ypp y rn`,.gFe Is Zi51 `,4 NY N4i V_.a GN��//••L�����4CNCG OIMNVYC `� O.�L •b�•'O I� r b a Y p G d N�.N G L Tq N p C C= O v 4 C h C C G� �t YO.yE G.. QAQ L01/11 L 90.j S' '.YQ= ^ 40�! O Y N `y` V Y G w C i Y L:• C O.`6 .y Y.. y�pV NY O�+S� yUMy14 y }.qNy L{YL�CV�w.Y IyyGI9�� M4D C ^ C�7L yO Y 4 q L 91 4 p O b =. 641 L N w p �Cp cN�....CM SNO H�1C BN�iI^.^Ol b.tllB MpO •C.0.�00 e:y tb 0.90N O N .O O Ql •CV{� OWC CC .2. -W ^ btl= CQ C�.■ fYQ.tl AM O C b 6 ` at ee p v V ��LL 11+p Y a p6IYry Y�l �N0C40 .. ^J� Ns 'L Op • Yd`a �� 6�`. Q 0. -Zn !l � C Y y iJ c.13 p � _ �WNE GM MC G yL^ VYpY^ �ty �•=6I ^ GY�/ "ro C a �e �8 so Omar Dw aaIL YYQ vY v'ec meatte:.. Hob ®r`M� 'i ! `tl YY ,O. tl Y �Y C �q{N MV^ Ya r'! 9� ^ ®" io�qp• C. $ M tl.tlt L M� otlo �C N ice' y_�tlQQ =� VP. ! Y�YYtlpp . y u�t ■tlI�y M 0 M M V^' e�IG M Q O` tl�V t^Q•`�p i O.. s YD 9yy1�.btly S' V6�' • �.CM3 ! O® ���p ^W K~. ® tl�BaYi lR y' _ 'S� CbtlO ;'• Ctl^ 9. 6^ dVtl� i^ mOyO 24 wC d6 Vpp7•o V�tlyy^ V O.N9p a:�^00 C}tO' e�9 :.v� N CM,V y Y� ^qtl a � Mgp�N l yN a4wJ � C C. L O+� «`{®®{9 .#� tlgDH� tl u�10.L_ ��y!R' ^_fl.�� a. Cgtl,q' CYCM �u�+ u 6pCyw pSN =N IVY{Iu .+ pq�' Vq YO �a■■i lend GGtIV p •� !o l Oo tl L.. gym. sia''aey oN^� `o$J4O°.. bt' i' r L O N CCrQ OI.�Q C�11 L Y ..' 4C yy i • cC Cqa • CC ■ y O O c� Y 1O. ■ it V p= m=Y p p V Y c L R v L Ng ouI N au- �. L �O QbOr. • L2C®N h Y6Vy wCbQO i G a O C C .q..3�Ny q.5Qy �yuy WO; 9_ w O 4 N >.*C Q V V ®p•�y Y' $ �L I q V�b �S^a qLc W ^ 4A VMw_00 N�VY Qa '.�O �■6 Ryw a�w�p:. 0+..� '� 90 ®.. mC -. 6c p�y. � c �y 6 e. `o v. o o u c Y ci n d rz..ai L , fie.- tcaia at .. w aup5 •'Yuy 241yG8�V4'I. �w 'N =�� s� m� `�'. c g''•-pr'i •..orb.`''� «�^og, m �4 u'^b'�. �s cY. Wed'. wlY. „' a�e,� �-�..oyay■■ `sYL.cc. 04 � p l"Y qti rL.aY C�O• OLN.'Ja C6 _�^ 6VJ4fd 'y ' =G� idV YQ•p•. 0T•a�p ^ aL '•GG ^ w� Vw V-Y d0a66yy y6y N Y4 i i •r O L :VyLy O 1 p N@ U N p{�y�•5 C n C T .S .N M CNc Vw O. b� W GCQpv Y2x NB•s u.. O ^4C 'C Ccyw�: COS J wG � sOOC�V. Na.� N ao�i :.cw..,� �'"�« o:.+s � aid $�."' L•. G�4. + `. YYq _JJ 1• w��9 Y � V b� ,' O � 6Y6. LLgmL LOr c � •��j .0�� Cp. A3Y. C Y •• w LQ .�.. r V 694 �rOV 4.•.• '� y��•�T•Y7Y aSu� O6V OY� L 0 � H i0! Cci.0 M�L 'Molt S om O 'r= W` ••�GCfLVi N 6��mG N k�0 r 6 6 0•. yw L �w w h L �: L allIM C Q Yw ^O gyTs dg Y Y N d Cf �,. s� •Y` r� u may H O C Vy C Q q i p Y Q - C 7 1�y d�L y �y® C tJ iYJ rgC Y C OQ Y p ... @ Yp d�4 YA Lp® mow,' G`• II CG. p'M.� VGA rNwV � Y w sSY T 3';�v^Cw�O:aCC w A w{GGt CmYs Dg�+.paM yO mp�w.maQMa�Oy �N�?• +ai.yVN vQ Z YXC-N r.w•0n■] O w C x Y• g i M C �. O�6 „ d:V L O v Y ws'Lom ® a �®. 't+.q. +g cV Yv n/°j .,gd oQ «c ,•O,p�,n m^Y6 VVOY m y 13 r• y�C �r�p mw .5 8.$yQy$ '�=1 1 �.®,'� ^N vNCgg m$�ra §moo q > uo L/ r�IG'� ¢�•s�e �w �'�� ��R.�YY y ee q V C '�4�••QVap B8E! Yam' • GC� b N •. Y . Oa6B � Y: Y DM:. `Y ��.Ro}Y�p•.. YQ C w(a w spL C �pS �V)•. G GGG�gL at F 046cYo rr y u.. �w� b Ya��{LL�. a z0.�•ps00� Y~� O.OpYa �. �� ~\YLi VYIYLPI n�yys�wo QN L O • a yqp ':C ' G �'O o�.�� NL YNr^. y;pC +��tl4 e y b;.q � �D®yyam ��. N. •���.. pa�0 AI'l�s® �a_W fso� �OLv wpm y pm GO CC � LGY 41 ca yy uyy ®p 00 rqq VOv t710 qr. Ois• Ovm My OI 6 V!m ��u••W G Le 61 M�VmY pig Vw �w m. tb CLY u N VYvv O �CpO ` ` t'4 Vvm G O�y C y■S g[{� ■® VQ C Y Kp Y•.l = ■� V hw•.w� •C6C# Ou 6M�ia C Yi ib Wi 9 � 6 '33v :AIM YY V OLyV•yi y >. ti CQ d p�L N as W II as vm[pe�. _Cc a J � a. iv e a 4� g. .. p up�a YY _r y� NSYNL YC� ae o.. �� s p pgea 00.6 LgO_ey�L �V L Op i a ■OYO C ol Y y: -Z U ^ '�V � q�.0� aac�a��■. � Sr®� r y4y � p. � c �W � -i � V wML O 01y -. J! O1p� GO. Z u r^=S$0} N.N■ppL YwPt .-^gOlq 0.01 {s� L . p y {L0 t!• <OY VOO� O 6 Yi M' V yp�a LCY{� Y.r yCV L Y N i'1I K. Vj .pI R mw AS pa oc c YCY �., oc..q o.. Ccc .�.� cw vm aC. _�� !L-•.s gc. C`C�`` `cuZc_� eLu.R� p01 �� O Vy ^ oO� 6q.. V UN-Y �VG �OYV O. cc NM w _ w` b H O V V b Yw °� q V 6 q _^ 48- EZ-= R` g p gS + Cif.' VZ LLL GLO r' N ��C V�p~p pwr `Ae Q. YN o tl� vV..V�m q�w MY. Qq qgl§ O�Af.O �0, p y #{Y�O q� &q p .o o Y q y y6 ja 3 O q V L L 'E Sr�d�um `OCegiiiiii atf �O .5 C Y p q 4 C M • Y W g ®® VC V M QO�~ • ri V b �dr bf0 yf#� 'i y y N Y b O a �.CNW C� a Lytl• CVJ � q..Y btlr ag6 t.Ur �d o§ ey •mg �a r "r M� " 9� g s05... �p •a ^� `.Sol as ®SAY. y�p9 ^$e fi _ p M if u@�pgg} CCo e�SbS�' N" C 'A°�'=® gqq- '`s`og -� &u. Q.r ^Yd q�s '�3.q .. �66i .�C. pJ. N'd�Ge +�c � �s,ay 107: g OL1y Qr Q� OS■yG� Y6` s bC:�• pY �N,.. YrVpL 60 �u:Rs = OO w {bA CG VSSY wN g l CLY� O yy C 7 L r�.\Vq.M O1gV.�D` 'p"o3 GCS i ��.Vj Y M Y L 5 RID �9V N w Q% ,GO G 9 6w®P b flak %O %q0 Le bCL.a OVI ,.,,..p w.uu �.o. v�oa .ec.S a�ce�w u...a u �."'., i u w \ M•.qL. Yr Oar O < < Nutl 9 E � w O Oyu. � � Sr M h pM w W $• C u r oY c M� s �. La■■yCyp Y0.4 drgGC Y �`�t O�<=Y = N ^\• N� w0. �Yy' 3�" QC Yy YC l a W YO Y -NN YO NO.. C�. V IV �$j C■� V± G is� � !V ��L.�` '.u H c � W� R N�q. a N b K�q ' w:5 Y�Vr Or ii �> m p wCLW `m tY C L L rb�`. •� r, �J YN 6•r p7Y. G C tla�l a.yQ y.�, LL a.. C.9�P �`RL RCY~. Y `� L=r Y6 L V•.�. P•• YL s,- Oy C: ;. TV' Ci LTV. y CY ir4>O qN R{�1 aO 1AY `. L ¢ C� y M a.H C�L1 O NeiNO OL...MGI Yud M YYO Olr q,. VaC ■4 NN_M �C..yayaC.r C_HH Ytc7CC q, yL iE l. .N Y i O M V N� Y.Y v Y.f J r .RS{N� b� ^ ,LC Y C Y p{.�a O Yp udL L� Y. •� L92 S Y.L = YCO V.0 a L.e . L ... ,C s N Y r i u r i vy gy� �O.��Y• :M'a O wY.M lf.J 4� WM KLL..i .46 t1Q 6i. Ci i�C �IY.VW KO.N.. c4i a« � i.N Mi me Y aN+u o81 ww C Y H r O �Ck 80 �YCaA CY s— Y _.6` A.•91 ^ ap�gi L�4b i�.e°C wR ��%r b Vie Em IL L a L 6 Y M ® 4 j • q r 9 Y 6�. Y y Ss's _ AjLY�M. Cq~ppyy�a�. yN Vy■ 4. Cw .1 h -it �_ , u aa, tit�~ c��r•:m �� t® s S V O M®V Y�i W '•iil W lil .ta 2!�a. `.2 CY �L.ft ,NV �!L NN:1N ND y� iL @g Y N �6Lis ar L� N Cyy VYM yt VjL�Y _�� r`Yy y� 4i iG�4OgyLE s NLr y H Y��.V. �b ■ Y 'M CY: ye E.. Lr.W YdM�zz.2 W H L V i 4 <b L1 �, •r N V Y.N U V 4 G W,9 r K 6 W ss _ C9 C� w, ,. N A II i •,n�w R N •O l I w �� I I W;� i • i ! �r Y o� N e �oL� it ui ..1 �W _ rJ� �L N S O ° _ aP, 'Ca _ S O °'Y $08 O '9=YG �+tCa L LHpYY s yC yy q V L V O + Y dd_�. �0• w O C. C ZE; y n Y. iQ tla.MOtB.y COV C+ L V 6tl ]�Id O Oa u�qq p MG �u �e Ie tl Ya su1�' 0 4 a s Zr Apo �.Lmu c _ Y 4 «»c � Yo .� ��._� sg .es. " am Ys yyNYe a sw^qqL ^o�Yd. V Ww4 ®' YY b� u..0 qao C. wC iGV C. Vq ZC w�p yA~. vA 0t�1V h1 N 6 Lie YIYeL A'Z rQ Cam. UOluw ® `'CY G. =d LC10 M to i "M L �[ s ` �'�. «=e^ wMi r d ` 6Vic. O.k tlO".i v NY C�qL - C9 � ■ .. A6 ,YEyyG,�. .• 60 a�eey�e.tld d�N ICJ Jtl nQ ��> �Ys{40� �C� Y{M��p OQ CN i y' � ENO ��� V. dr'7 iBd�r_ y¢ �`Y N�. O:M9 qY.p 41 {Yy�Y�Y CC�e1. ��l� 74 a �� yLC OM OOY Y� tlw]L �.UC A6«" tS O �s <y 6 s Y a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF U RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION'. FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR PHASES 1 AND 2 (91"LOTS) OF VESTING ' TENTATIVE TRACT 13890, AND„MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT ` 1 THEREOF - APN:, -201-271-13, '14, 33, 34,E 41, AND 42. 1. WHEREAS, ill equest has been filed for a time extension for-, the above-described project,.:and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditioslly approv& tcpe above-described Design Review. SECTION ti The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the-, �r following :findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market ,cliutate, for development of the project. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to -develop the Projsat at this time. � ,I C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding -expirations woulu not be consistent with the'intent`of the Development Code. Y D. That the granting of said time extension will !lot be detrimental to the public health, ,sa:.efiy or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity `" SECTION 2: The Rancho -Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for:.. - Pro7ec: Applicant Expizatioa ._s .. .a Design Review HdmestPad August 9, 1992 Phases 1 and 2 of Vesting Tentative Tract 13890 w APPROVED AND ADOPTED TH18 LOTH DAY OF,JULF 1991. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t � � y tb CY {S � c PLANNING Col24ISSION RESOLUTION NO. o TE FOR DR OF VTT 13890 - HOMESTEAD July 10, i991 Pace 2 (S J (S Larry-T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: fI ) Arad Ba11er, Secreta � / I, Brad Buller, Secretary of tIIie Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that; the foregoing Resolution was duly ands regularly introdurnd, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cozmission ,of the City of Rancho 0-1` -iaonga, at a regular meeting of, the Planning Commission held i on the 10th day .f July 1991, by the following vote-to--wit. AYES; �� n ;AYES: L'OMMISSIONERS: �\ NOES: COMMISSIONERS:, k ! ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 12 C Pam. - fi✓ V 1 91 _17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA f STAFF REPORT � r� DATE: July 10, 1991 TO; Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner i} 2Y: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: -} TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14139 - AHMANSON - A request for an extension of a previously approved residential subdivision of '119 single family lots on 54 acres of land in the Lour Residential district (2-4 dwelling -units 'per acre), located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 25th Street -APN. 225-082-01. I. BACKGROUND., Tentative Tract 14139 was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on July r2, 1989, and is due to expire on July 12,41991. The applicant is currently requesting a one-year time extE.3ion •V,o• expire` on July 12, 1992. Provisions of the Development Code allow' for time extensions in twelve-month increments, not to exceed five years from the original date of approval. In addition, a Development A keement and Annexation Agreement were approved by the City Coun�eil on November 16, 1988. II. •' %NALYSIS: Staff has analysed the proposed time extensip� and has compared the proposal with the current development criteria outlined in the Development Code. Based upon this review, staff has determined that the project meets the basic standards for development in the Low Residential District. The project also meets the requirements of the Development and Annexation Agreements. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS.: She Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application; A. There have. been no significant changes in the Land Use Elei1c"it of the General Plan, Devel©pment Code, or character of the area which would cause the project to become inconsistent =or non- conforming. %, 2:, B. The granting of an exten�L would not be detrimental to the public health, safety pr welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements. in the vicinity. ITEM F n n oo PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF PVPORT TT 14139 AHMANSON July 10, 1991 Page 2 IV. RECOMMENDATION: Str£f recommends that tha Planning Commission�7, approve a one-year time extension for Tentative Tract 14139 through adoption of the attached Resolution. ll ? p - ,i Respe 1y su ettd, Bra er Cit Planner BB:BN:s ' P Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Litter from Applicant 4 Exhibit "B" - Ttact Map Exhibit "C" - Ss a Utilization .Map f Exhibit "D" -Resolutiun 89-95 \ Resolution of Approval js �7 I 3 jI AHMAN:3ON DEVELOPME,. TS. INC. 1370 SOUTH VALLEY VISTA OR,SUITE I00.DIAMOND BAR,CALIF}f Rftilh 91765•0141860.5400 June 7, 1991 ; Planning Commission P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91725t 33a� Rer. Tentative Map Extension y.` Tiact *141 i , Ladies and Gentlemen: Ahaurson-Developments respectfully requests a`12 month,e::tension of the referenced Tentative Tract Map. This Map was approved an July 12, !989 after the property was annexed to the City of Rancho- Cucamonga with a Development Agreement. Since the Tentative Map approval, Ahmanson Developments has executed a cooperative agreement .. 11 with the adjacent property owner to :design and construct wa!ler andz. sewer infrastructure improvements to serve properties north of 24th Street between Day Creek and EV anda Creek. Construction of these improvements is almost completed'. We have also prepared grading r plans, improvement nlanai and a tract map which have been through four checks and are ready for,-,=tijnature. Agreements: with County and Federal agencies for off-tract.. City Master Plan work are being reviewe3. A tentative map ex' _ -)ion will allow us to resolve these issues with staff prior to recording of-the tract map. Thank you for considering this request. Very truly your Craigge v r? Vice Presidenfi d cc: M. Kehke CITY OFRA�))ZHD UCANa0NM: Deborah Rosenthal, Esq. CPslm JUN u ° �y3 4i ry , t qg •'� fi: ID -71 _ { .._• ' �V Ira =� `'P •. r �Y L ® _ jq Li CITY _wff MEM: -rr 144AI RAC .:MU: ?A ;. PLANNM MN � � ErxHIBrr:---,�:SCAt.E: Olt t 46 fle it z m lim , \� i �r_A'•o..; f� y1 ti r (tad + t 1 /. _ �1. �j,r--�-'..- � ♦ 7 i r i io 0. `\' ��<< � �A� ' .�\�. )yam ♦f/�' /+��/ t� !�„;i .` ' .,�\� � Sr jt. � �°'+Li`V�7vP��}ie �ta' '01. •r'.J � �J D - --% ' �ti, ,+u # =`J{ © Ji'rJitE�';•JI +'�10 ip f.r \ i � A � ,� � i i rl•1 1;�2 i i—ram 1 y CITY. TITLE �7C�Z / -i f Pi+AfatizlING DIVISM EXHIBIT. SCALE: , u r� RESOLUTION NO. 89-95 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE'TRACT MAP NO. 14139,- A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 119 SINGLE FAMILY`10TS ON 54 ' ACRES OF LAND .TN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 j 4. DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE:)_, LOCATED AT. THE SOUTHWEST cCORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE "Au>:5TN STREET, AND MAK1,NG FINDINGS-' N SUPPORT THEREOF APN„,,225-OELOI A. Recitals. Ai (i) , Ahmanson Oeval.opments, Inc. has filed an ap�ftication far the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14139 as described in t6 title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract tap request is referrer to as "t ar,application":' (ii) On the 12th day of July, 1989', the Plan[ ;r!g Comuission of the City of Rancho °Cucamonga ,conducted a duly noticed R+blic hearing or, the application er;d concluded sa•?d'hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites 'to the adoption of this Resolution , have occurred.. 1, B. Resolution. NOU. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of"itancho .Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifiral.lyi finds that aiLi of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,-of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referefited public hearing on July,12, 1999, including written and eml staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission 'hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application a pl es to, property c located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 25th StVaet with a street frontage along`Etiwanda Avenue of approximately 1,350 feet and lot depth of 1,035 teet`` at the north tract boundary and 2,400 feet-it the south tract boundary; and (b) . The property to the east of the project is designated for; residential u$e-;md is;curren'cly vacant,, the ;property to the ,south of the proje-t is app`roved_Tract 13527 and'the,property to the north and west-of the 7 projecc is an SCE�eorridor and is currently �4cant; and (t) The project, wilt ;the recommended Condition-,,of Approval, ' complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and,, 0 - Et PLANNING COMMISSIJI`-� SSOLUTION NO. 89=95 RE: TT-14139 ,'+Ff.-. .SON 1; July 12, 1989 G. r Page 2 (d) The development of 119`single family lots on 54..acres is ccnsistent with the approved Development Agreement, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to'this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in parag.aphs 1 and 2 above; this Commission hereby finds and r concludes as follows: C (a) That tentative tract it consistent with the General 'Pla • pm Code, and specific plans; ands Dev..loent (v) The do-sign of "improvements,_!'of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific Plans; and (c)' The 'site is'physically suitable for the•tyoei of,development proposed; and (d) The design_ of the subdivision is not likely to cause' substantial environmental damas�-�ard avoidable injury to humans';and wildli€e or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and _ y'A (f) The design of the tentative tract will not: conflict with any easement acquired' 'by the public at large, now of record, for access ' through or use `of the property within the proposed subdivisions 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has ' been reviewed and cans dered in compliancy;-with the California Environmental - Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. r� 5, Based upon'the findings and conclusions set_forth in paragraphs'' 1, 2, 3, 'and 4 above, this Cainission hereby approves the application subject to each and ,every condition'set forth below and in the attashed Standard Conditions, ai;tached hereto,rad incorporated herein by this reference.. Planning Division 1) The design of the perimeter wall along Etiwanda Avenue, as well as the�,treetscape shall be designed in conformance with poljcies and sjandards set forth in the proposed Etiwanda North Speci:�ic 'Plan. 0rawings shall be reviewed . and _approved by the„Design Review Committee prior—to the recordation of the tract map. 2) A temporary fence, such as chain link, shall be'placed across the paseo "connection to Tract 13527''to ite south. y until such time as that tract davelops. 0 PLANNING COMMISSIC (,�ESOLllTION t�O. 89-95 % RE TT 14139 - AK. 'SON r� July 12, 1989 Page 3 0 1 3) The enhanced parkway tir-Lfitment along Streets "A",_ "0'; and "F11 shall be re-designed to include a double row of clustered trees. The design shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the recordation of Ey the tract snap. 4) The ownership of the slope located "along, the south tract " boundary shall be. transferred to 1,h? ,southerly property r owner prior to recordation of 04e� ar. If this. i-s not feasible, an exclusive yard _easement or ;'me other acceptable mechanism should be `agreed upon prl to map recordation. Installing gates in the wall to provide for homeownOr access is ro: ',consi& ed to be an acceptable solution. . S) Masonry walls along thie pasen edges shall be provided and shall be terminated at the front yard setback line. Some tym of low visual barrier may,extend to the curb where a ,hopri ate. 6) The paseo connection to Etiwand'A Avenue shall be m4intaiaied to prnvide` a connection to the proposed Community Trail: Howa ar,-' a parkway strip shalt be provided; between the , sidewalk and the street to discourage mid-block crossings. �f 7) Prior to rthe recordationof the final map or the issuance of building permits, 4hichevs-. :comes first, the.-applicant shall consent to, or participate�n; ;e establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide in conjunction.`with the applicable School District for the 'constraction';and maintenance of necessary school ` facilities, "-/However, if any, School District has previar.:1y established- such a Community Facilities District; tite applicant shall, in the aiternative, consents to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the l+' recordation of the final map 'or the issuance of building i permits, .whichever comes first. J Further, if the-:affected School District has not formed a " Mello-Roos rommsnity Facilities District within twelve months'of the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building' permits for said project, this condition shall -be deemed null and void. l This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the ;applicant and the affected:School Districts have..,. entered into an agreement to privately ,accommodate any and all schoolimpacts .as a result of this project PLANNING COMMISSIG' ESOLU_JN NO, 89-95 RE: TT 14139 - AH,...,SON July 12, 1989 Page 4 8) The developer�shali provide,each prospective buyer Written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project priar tgf accepting a deposit on any property. 9) -The developer, shall commence, participate in and consummate, or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for Foothill Fire Protection District;to finance a fire station to serve the development+; including land facilities, s equipment, and operations, and maintenance. Tile station shall be located, designed and built to all specifications of the'Foothill Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with,;its needs. In any building of the station; developer Fhall comply with,,all applicable laws and regulations. The 'Community Facilities District shall be formed by District and developer by the time of recordation of the final map. z 10) Prior to accepting a deposit on any property, the d6elgper `ll shall' provide each prospective buyer written notice of'the following: a) The paseos trail system consists of ,public trails j �., link6ms, neighborhoods 'and providing access to the Community and Regional Trail system. j b) "'K" Stree!; is intended 'to be a :through street which , will ultimately-,extend' to the south to connect- with future subdivisions. 11) The grad'�ng design shall be revised to utilize through-lot conduit drainage on a single-lot through single-lot basis. The ,slope at the southerly boundary shall `'oe limited to a mazirvum, of 12 fact in eight, with 8-9 feet -being preferable. A drainage acceptance letter shall; be required from Tract 13527 to the south.' .-possible construction of the southerly street within Tract 13527 or some form of,written agreement with the property owner-may be be necessary to accomplish the drainage concept., Engineering Division 1) Etiwanda Avenue/shall be constructed full width south of its southerly intersection with "A" Street to 24th Street and half width from "A" Street north to the center of.the SCE right-of-way: Off—site parkway improvements 'may be deferred until development of the property to'the ,south. �-arkway improvements shall be, provided on the nest side of Etivanda Avenue north of the project site - the developer may request a` reimbursement agreement to recoier thB_66i �, PLANNING COMMISSIO'. ISOLUTION No. 89-95 RE: TT 14139 - AH. :SON July 12, 1989 Page 5 yr } of. construction south of the southQroject boundary, from future development as it occurs. J 2) Twenty-fourth• (24thj• street shall ,.bs constructed full width (except for parkway improvements and median landscaping) from its. intersection with Etiwanda Avenue (exist.ing) to its intersection with Etiwanda north of` 24th. The developer may request :a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of construction from future development as it occurs. 3),, Etiwanda'Avenue, between 24th Street and ;Highland Avenue, shall be upgraded, including =surfacing and an adequate structural section 32 feet wide,, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4) Landscape maintenance` easements shall"be dedicated to the City for thearea between the perimeter wall and the right• of-wa; for Etiwanda Avenue. 5) Landscaping'•and wall heights within the lines of, sight for all intersections.shall be,limited as required by the City Traffic Engineer.= 6) Etiwanda Avenue mays. 'transition• to a 44-foot curb width <3 within a 66-foot,right-of-way north of V' Street if verified' by a traffic impact study subject to the approval of the City Engineer (minimum pavement width of 26 feet within a 40-foot dedication);. 7) Permits will be refluired from the following agenciLs for !yark within their rr,ights-of-way: c a) San Berns;,i!o County Flood Control District,: b) 'Southe7i California, Edison Company for the construati'AP of Etiwanda Avenue; and (gV G c) Metropolitan dater;;District for the'tconstructio6 zf 24th Street. 8) construct` thy' City Master Plan Storm`Drat cage_Facilities listed below: a) A trapetoidal channel alocg the north property line,2 b) The facility for crossing underneath'Etiwanda Avenue, and c) The 24th Street`storm drain to the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds. Sj PLANNING COMMISSION 'SOLUTION NO 89-95 RE: -TT 14139`=AHM,,,AN July 12, 1989 ,•;, Page � 14 r�� U Standard drainage fees' for the site shal l "be crf-,( ted to s that portion of the ,construction" costs _Incuri4d in t constructing permanent drainage fad lities:,specified on the City's Master Plan of stoF.m drains and the developer shalt be eligible for reimbursement of allowable coifs in excess of the fees in')accordance with City policy. Ariy additionai costs for ;over-sizing facilities for interim flood << proteCw=ion shall be,borne by the developer. « 9) Construct ad 'interim'retention b`OSirn within the,:tiwanda -Spreading Grounds to mitigate increa;ed flows at the outlet 24th:Street storm drain. 10) Plans for the 24th Street Master Plan 'Storm Drain and 1 interim, retention basin shall • b6 approved b. !,;. the(City `' Engineer and the Flood .Control Oistrict`�jirior to apprc4ai of the Final ( ap or issuanee' of*wilding permits, whit hover occurs first. 11) .yCoitstrud an interim storm drainages facility to Ireceive flows from :the trapezoidal channel along the north property r line which does one of the following. The interim facility .> stiall be designed t:;` .he satisfaction of the, City Engineer. a) If easements are`rbtained from the•property owner(s) to the east, in interim channel may be extended either to the existing•sWale 1150 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue or all 'the Way to the Etiidanda Spreading Grounds,w.sth velocity dissipation facilities, east of titiwanda „ Avenue. b) If off-site easements are not obtained,"construct`'a debris basin ors-site'with ati inlet strueturec,;from the � trapezoidal channel and an outlet - structure which discharges to the sti9rm drain �1" N in A Street. Downstream loud and master plan storm drain facilities shall be ,up-sized as needed.- Interim access to the permanent channel' access road shall be provided ,from "A" Street without crossi:ig the flow path. A maintenance agreerant shall'- be Executed to the satisfaction o ft*he Cite Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing pr vate maintenance of the interim facility, 'but providing' the City With the right of access to,maintain the facility if 'private maintenance " is insufficient, and allowing the City to assess those 4;osts to the developer. The developer shall` be responsible ford" r caving the interim facility and,, completing the trapezoidal channel at,such time as the interim facilities are no longer needed. ?. 1 u PLANNING ,COMMISSIr RESOLUTION NO. 89-95 RE: TT 14139 - Ah....ASON ' July 12, 1989 Page 7 AOL 12) A permanent trapezoidal channel shall be constructed Clang the _west property,_ boundary, adjacent to the Southern California Edison corridor, and extended wouthwesterly to the end of the 24th Street master plan storm drain line. A desilting, basin" shall be constructed at the inlet to the storm drain. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to `recover the cost of constructing facilities south of the project's south,, boundary from future development of the adjacent;property as it kz,,rs` 13) Both' trapezoidal channels shall be contadne .,-;within permanent storm drainage easements. A 15-foot wide paved r access road shall be constructed on the downstream side (south and east),of the channels" for their entire length, with access at both ends to a public street. The channel.. shall be fenced on the'upstream'sides. 1> There shall be no public, access to the channel access roads. The developer shall form or, annex to a Maintenance AsseSsmOnt District n fo, these facilities. \\`�. 1 14) Pedestrian - bridges shall be constructed ar4�,oss =the trapezoidal channels to align with Lots 0 and E. The bridges shall be designed to preclude pedestrians using the channe;;+.' access roads, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15) ;The project shall contribute to, the future construction of the EtiwandalSait Sevaine Regional `'Drainage/Flood., Control an Facilities by forming or neg to a benefit as3essment, or a Community Facilities [�istricxint or .by the payment of regional drainage fees as established by the City Council. Formation or annexation or fee"!payment shall be - prior to the :final Map approval. 16) It shall be the Developer's responsibility *.o have the current FIRM Zone (A, 8, or D) designation remo�ied from the project area. The Developer's Engineer shall' ,prepare all necessary reports, I plans,` hydrologic/hydraulic, calculations, etc. Preliminary approval shall be obtained from FEMA prior to approval of the recorded map or issuance of building „permits, whichever occurs first. The designation sF `ll be afficially removed prior to occupancy 'or improvemr,, .,ceptance, whichever occurs first. Ii) If the p►olect is ii be developed in phases, each individual phase shall be designed to provide maximum public safety, conven,ence for public service vehicles, and proper ` traffic circulation. In order'' to` meet this requirement, the following will be required prior to the finalization of any phase: PLANNING COMMISSION i0LUTIGVN0. 89-95 RE: TT 14139'- AHMA..,ON au iy 12, 1989' Page.,8 f � r�t S; e 5J( a) Completion of the improvement pans for the total project or sufficient plans beyond`yhe phase boundary to verify the feasi4'ility of tfie ,!°sign to the satisfaction'of thE`City,En3ineer, j b) A plan siiall be submitted for review and approval.I~'y the Engineering Division, Fire, and Planning 1 Departments indicating what improvements will be constructed, with the given 'phase, :subject to the following: j, „ (1) Street improww'As beyond'the, phase boundaries, r as necessary to provide secondary access, (2) Drainage facilities, such as ' storm drains, channels, earth berms, and ,. block wails, as necessary, to protect the:de�,Iopment from off- :_ site flows, (3) A properly designed, water system capable of providing `required fire Jtow, perhaps looping'or extending heyond the phasei'boundaries, (4) Easements for any of thel above "and the installation, na`essary utilities, and (5) Phase bouries shall �orres and to the lot lines nda shown on the approved tentative map. 18) Lots d and E shall be,-? lgned��to accommodate maintenance vehicle access to i:he channel., access J'road to the. satisfaction of the City Engineer. ` 19) The Oeveloper shall make a goad faith effort to coordinate se yi the alianment of ,Lot f wi,th,—d pao 4n�-Tentative Tract 13527,,-which may require revising the locatic:;,of lot F. 20) The�soutfi half of 25th Street shall be vacated. 21) Cross-gutters shall be eliminated `tf storm drains are available at an,intersection. 6. The:Secretary to this Cortimission shall certify to the ado*tiic,'r of this Resolution. ` ,r �c l .� I PIAiY,N2G COh4MISSIf 1E5C1lUTION NO. 89-99 Vrl RE:- TT 14139 - Ahiw4sf{" July 12, 1989 Pare 9 Ask APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS"12TH DAY OF JULY, 1989.\ PLANNING COhfii�5S10N OF`THE CITY OF RANgH0 CUCAMONGA iA r , ATTEST: _ } ra u ILI eV,4 ec etar - I, a Brad g 1eir, Se etary*of the Planning Comniss+on of t4la Cityaof Rancho Cucamon�� ,.-do hey eb; carti�fy that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularl introduf;ed, gassed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cgamonga;,�at a regular meeting ,of the Planning Commission held on the 12th d4 of July, 1.98.9, by the following. vote-to-wit: AYES: COtji;SSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, WEINBERGER NOES: \, COMMI-IONERsz.A NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS, �..,u:STOY � v o a) ----- - Cam. SHIM Al CYYpO1 �� A�y`Y 070 w�YS� i. �M�N� Vp4 6C�6 — •Dg■may Yy .� aw4v �''Y7iyil:Y Y®.-_. rVp p0. N��.L� NYtl =GFOO ;_o'$e ' oo$o` $v $ ;�a,� ee oil E $:�6�' ni c jt aa .E wkaw u..`Y$a, �. +_ Ow•O 1.YO.�OLY YYIsg�. V G <y .O lid {yt{C�9Y. • Y V i vY dSOw LCC-~pp CCyYyy CV; O ®-cY aYY 61.i Y�► Y C O .v~ C a'QGA Y 7.�ee•O. Y�Y Onn{y> s y` U y Y Y V y Q C p 0 +ys 0 0 f� C,'CN O g Y w SGw Y qyoG I a � i �wg -- J 6j H1 aggit iM A O yLr w y6 >®p r w GI 6 11.-a p„ ~_w �"M J• . ..�` 'is AV AilVyY 'Y.�..O�pys Y Yw' ..pi, G�'C_O Vn Y� M.CGyOY ACM�. Yp�.P O�YyY� Y•® - s y qYYy GwtldCpY• ../ «� ,E $.� ~'■■ w>. 9$�g �cE�� N ti . ~ y F"• w 0 Oc wt� ss Y tltltle w k w L`N Y0ZE 'w 7k .` �$ • tl s..e j n�s W A O Eli p ~ t 161 1 * .. "w`� age$ ci✓aio `a.:c •1_. Y q—. .S'.-3 O..a j 50r " . w —+ =1 ae�� a�-S �OYYgg ���xO� �`� 8 io�� O� `• "' Boa -n- : $ ` m!= x ccvvyy yy i •+. Nw 6 v�yCyN y�wcc�C� V�OIA�Cr�rs j14Y. gr +�� uY `may GH6 �� �`8oC. oCOCM+ y c y■jOtC»+N a��C LZ�Sa It! 31 I gals Al zz- -^�A 8 7! �wYYy c i US IT er. s` t��ag�'a=�at yi • N 6` —fie . . is k. � � � _ 37f - � 1 —! A TH IPA � �il` W f� oz g-31 -iM.O K-wf V-sl M -sit ao�e tea' �. �� tl'.�. o�'aa u=lilu�'$ ems.sGC�' °1 ■■�`��b�pp� N6GV. • � rL ryry yy .. —LG � NCY�Y 70 P VaelGO;VCC O. CG��OC. 'fie•' G��.Y �YBVfi—bwi"-z t ` G �opylrJ ^.«NO V V 4.y _ y0. YaS 4w Mr 00 1tlL�Y �M 3 Y!y w 4 w C 9 O M 0 'y Y M M C • k�4 Y Y. V G aNN G. �++.N.N S2'^ �..$'. c ?'.i o 'Moog-dM YY '«�S�N spy 't'.Y.e .'`fib v0 R • N NVeiO� ti0 -- �.v pN�t 01'O`. 4 4 M S`. O • b N+Y Y.L L N i A Yyy V C C 4 fi Y ey. NS I wtl. .x 1 �c�e {�oioe $ pp�§¢'{y'� NY uL MQ��,+�•'� $� ���gy�a�p �w j� tmg,� z IL IIYY t Y BN� p V V Y~Y� C r�o � �M Vi c Mt, � qY r ��G ati upr Tit MwMOM QN� QN 9N0 M QWY\O.P, ! 1 Y� V~ Q M� i� Y sf'ZS tl� �`wa� 1Y G gayG Y a' •J . Y M 13 au Y 4 sell. M.�ip 3..�� � e4Bi iiii J� r ` S• r .l .i ya '�—ya� gpj M. �O 3r1 �i{tl� NY lit �YpDp yyYeey���tl Y ^ a�. ,��� m-� siaY�=Yp M.r • �3� �ry��Y�� CC.1b�.r B • �@ e y. b' G•o a O -'90�6 �... �!• � =L®Oy Mybc 4.�>p tl rYy� Pa q� M P.F�il® i Yr—N yU t� .S p� ` ]"yytl �y ri��V O Cwr br Gryry pwV+ y t y �1 ii p�fy iP.lkO C�CxI�`" .�z.*�*. r(�Gi Yd`Ga y RYNO trea� i QON ON 4Y @1 FOM—i Sn 1a G f. 'tl 6' P� N� e7 f N ki V IY 7 W Yvd Y�04 �C Lie de H -OYCLL Yp �$S�a $A `N �y�L. �YC, �• �sY � �GV =Cu= �V 1ve� Cy'�.YY�w �4VYLNYN rtl dN v� Z X,t: _low V CL6. e�gp OIL�.. W ' P a� e ,c u tl td T1 {@y� C 6 N.COO�• 6LLYnh Q�"J .N sg aCy b `yyam - RY i {Spy ii a>I ,.� y�..4itl � 4� �•9� Y �Vp fiL tl 6L qCq 7�M�.M.. �� C�6�� NYryu[i: « 0 N A=9•- Y = iY. U R qQ y .a2 .. •OL.� O.u< Leg`® L7��N R yy �y V= f� y K YbY :9 e�� YMOtl �wga d`o$ =L'�:.R� .Fee W ' Sa � m4.en .:N Hui er Is 6 V p N y ( y. VC itl.b •. Y ®YS CN= bag v �V r�eAO� y }trQ ® Ii barg P by y; N., nis 1♦♦.�c� bW. .P '�����lllY 2.71A. 9 In .9 �yLgy YLY ��yM .i^b� � � �p• �"`�Y as 4P��� �� y' �` Q�y� Q l)1 g'Cyy.J e �(TC yq,g] a � Lgq�Lrq b L K Oy MR it W.V. LI o �'v� eqm b� t AQ�« O.M r H IPAtl 6` CAa•p �' b ,gV. ,� 3_1� p. � '.. v$ �b OOr 12 . 8�,.�Y6 r � O Q �� � 1�_ � �My• l� gQ �A` 1y1tl Jp �tl.`Y ✓ •■.7e� Y '� �.. L�� VYO� p gsRt�,OPOa. ��� L.tl�, �.., .�� ',.:`®P •��ib `yNpCM�Cj:WL }$! y �._i.ooy♦ —L 3a C faL.� .yutl r�u D •.Y.r bm ' a SsP grd,3ce..3 At LMOY-6 Y 4uy�•. ` tl.n 411 y tl =sqyN` .1 q1zLW UC `� NyY PSVJ� GYy� Or II C cc C WW $ a 1. 'fig, r 43 gw a V_4p_ p �Wy ,E.r, a G iJ. 7o A.i ti 0 r Y 4m`Yog Y 9f wa ` S 3I $ $ a cr .spa°�F ui $aea YL y5 u eYiY ` 1 -a «f b®. Oo® e po va y p �1 6. t..����ppnng. Bad ��:.v,.K �r i6d 4 ^ b K^TL RY�j p ;:s 8 �w � r y q yJ p m � _g. t� 12 ady:p y�i t�• B b M I Z b ®�`.4sap CPp6C�d•no ..:•) R..Y = L flit IS' C L 6�y a C� a M Q yp �My �y y�. • _ ® 0 .y i • Q «� V1E6J va '6!n r..lQ W ITL b. �15 A3Y V w C{.N yA WAO Oa0 O B�{1�1_:' ILL RHO ®0 4w Ba ab me,p3p,d Q1♦g1 Y 1M� Wuu W A Mid 6.$' BOO a01d < is 6 4 A Y IV I9 Y" 6 fV Iq 4 N A _ 1j�r: �e wo�� of w` o •' o. o63'au .Y. �' a lif v'�' �q._; ���`. r.e v u Y�u 5 w 5 •' �, o ' Cc CC v M w e CC pp C y�y • •SCiill >y Y�Y.S �i� �yCC�"§Y - � � L. � �`�� pN zlv Yp 7eK6iO• O.••a .9 0R 34 Y�■� a9 OY�. 3 q y e ZZ go u® y pCq1 ■Qp ry N N Y IX A,,q-EQ`.1 d` pE dp� •_Y Y� Y q•. .M. Y •P` `r 1q. Ot S�tb� O y4 OgLg�r"1s ^ sipYu i� ui'•� YI.'�qy.b � �$�i,i fie.'app. d`osac Pn$ aws izz Ca •....'a¢�e ac: u® its �• � �wVW :yrees _,., a .. .... N O w•� a (d 4 n ZZ C �.� M �g e N L.IaA Nwyy%... +py T3 ate; Ntr,. v • .. y`�S w ` _ 5 C It vi r r� rat, 4Y �b 6 M� Rj•�[, 1Ez�� � t��q ��yW �"M �li �a Il ryry .+^t B Y D O r L V L d U e O gN r `� ���� ��� S _��$ � e� �H `M� ,• duo �� ., �` pS p fa0 �� �. `+ YY M. •Ao- iy all— v Y 9�• �p�� �L �aQl®� D2a. sp ® ®.. �da. �•Y. 01e •�'a ��_�� �� a i `'�� ��� a iJ�$ s.��_. Kew 41 if _ Y .. < FMr i� YW Wv6i 4D iz V � a a L• l� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF.THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA; APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT, NO. 14139,LOCATED:AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 25TH STREET AND MAKING YMINGS IN-„SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-082-01 l =i* J� A. Recitals CJ i,l Ahmanson has filed an application for the extension of Z, tative. Tract No. 1.3139 as described in the title of this.Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolutic'n, the subject, Time Extension request 3 K,�iP,ferred to a-"the application." (ii) On July 12,1989, this`'Commission<adopted its Resolution No. 89 9'S, tt;ereby approving, subject•}to specific - conditions and time limits, Tentative Tract No. 14139. ti (III) A11 legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution'; have occurred. -B. Resolution. ` Ask NOW, THERE )RE, it is her%by found,jidetermined, and resolved Vy the Planning Commissior .if the City of''Rancho Cucamonga as follows: „ f C� 0. 1. Thibi.-6mi.ssion hereby specifically findw that all c1;`the facts set forth in,the Recitals, 'Part�A. of this.�-Resolution'are true and correct,- 2. Based'-upon substantial evidence preaen=ed to this Commission, including written and oral staff rep%its this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (af' The previously approved Tentative' Map } atvbstantial compliance with the City0s current: Gt;aral Plan, Specific Planj,' 'Ordinances, ` Plans, 17-:idesi and Policies; and (b) The extension of the• Tentative Map will not-. ,cause significant . inconsistenities with 'the current General Plan, Spa:;ific Plins; �h Ordinances, Plans, Codes,„zid Pollcies;'and' (c) A'The extension of the Tentative Map Is not = likely to cause public health, and safeti, 'problems, a ,7 (d) The extension is within the time limits p<escribed by-state law and local ordinance.. a PLANNING"COMMIoSION RESOLUTION NO. 4, 2T�'14139 AHMANSON J` a July 10, 1991 page 2 n. x t t � 3. Based upon tie`findi�,�gs and conclusions set Forth in paragraphs Land 2 above, this Comma Sion„hezeby grants a Time Extension for: ,' Tract Applicant, ` ,, Expiration 14139 Ahmansot ff *uly 12, ls'`2 - 4. The Secretary to this Commt�-pi,on steal 7, certify to the a6.4ptio,x of this Reaolution• 7,v 1r " APPROVED ZAND ADOPTED,THIS'1'Oth DAY-,OF JULY, 1991. = j I PLANNING COMMISSID 0,^.„THE CITY 0? RANCeq,,CUCA%ONGA u marry T. WcNiel, Chairman _ l: v ATT'ST: _ Brad, Buller, Secretary I,. Brad Luller, Secretii y oil the Planning�mmission bf�the City,.'of Rancho Cucamonga, do_ hereby cert0y that ,the :Foregoing Resolution, was .duly and' re9u7__rly introduced, =passed-,"and adooC�3dIby the Planning CommisnidA`'9f the City of Rancho"Cucamonga, at*a regular meetintj of the Planning Commission held E on the 10th day of July 1991.rby'the Zollowing vote,-to-wit.: AYES: COMMISST.HERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Ap:3ENT: COMMISSIONERS: j Al q s� �g —CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONGA- ' j/ STAFF, REPORT r; DATE:i July 10, 199.1 TO: Chairman an-A Members of the Planning Commission u FROM* Brad Buller, Citj Planner BY: Scott-Murphy, Associate Planner. :. SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT-ii AND DEVELOPMENT J DI'STRICT AMENDMENT 91-0i CITY OF RAKZHO"CUCAMONGA - h request to ' amend the Development Districts Map from "OP" (Office,. Professional) to "i?flSP" '(Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan) for an *, 8.3 acre parcel located at thelnortheast corner of Foothill Boulevard and>Rochester weaue - PPN: 227- j 152-18 and '30c" 'Staff rec4ends' issuance of"a Negative Declaration. ENVIRONMENTAJ, ASSESSMENT .AND FOOTHILL SOUL?VARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-0Y -' CI1TY OF RANCHO,,CUCP.MONGA A 'request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific: Plan to include t„e: $ 8.3 -ac-,e qaYce1' at the northeast corner of Foothill Brslevari and Rochester 7-4enue within Subarea 4 and establis4 standards for development -- APN., 2'27-152-18 . and 30. Staff ecnmmenda issuance of a Negative Declaration. r ,i ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA "COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA " request to establish certain Rtx'eetscape anrl' site dL.Jgn standards cor 93;3tent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan for that portionof Foothill Boulevard within the Terra Vista' Plamied Community. Staff recommends issuance of, a Negative Declaration. r, ENVIRONMENTAL _ ASSESSMENT W,,'D VICTORIA' IX1MUNTTYY PLAN, ANENDM;-31T'91-01 -CITY OF RANCHO COCAK0%GA - A requestt}to estahlash,,certain stre?tscape and site design standards consistent.-with the Footh'11�,f Boulevard Specific Plan'.for that`por'tiion of Foothill 1�Uzpvard vi;thin ,ths Victoria` Planed Community. a Staf.f reccmmads lss;ln' ce of L a Negative Declaration. E:YVIRONMENTAL Assmst E IT AND", INDD?tSTRIAL_SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-04 - CITY'OF RANCHO'CUCAMONGA - A'-:"request to establisa certain streetscipe and site .design standards consisteiit with the Footh ill. Boulzvn.:dw'Specific, plan for that portion' of Foothill^Noulecar&..within' the 1hdvstrial ;. Area Speci is Sian. Scsfi`�-;ecc:,=ends .issuances),of a Negative Deciara'_on.; f ITEM G-If PLANNING COM41SSION STAFF REPORT' DDA. 91-01 CITY OF mjNcao CUCAMo"GA July 10, 1991 Page 2 I, w BACKGROUND: On June 12, 1991;\the Plain ssi to oaddress these items to allow staff' the , oppo tunit Y_ concerps/comments raised by th �'Commi-ssion and to-work, with Lewis tiomes'z>a further refinements ana clarifycations to the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement. After having met with Lewis Homes, it appears that there are only two major areas of disagreeaaent, 1) pedestrian orientation toi'ards Foothill Boulevard and 2) ,landscaping. II. ANALYSIS: A. Pedestrian Orientation"- Duril)g the preparation of the-Design ceased their con--ern about the Supplement, Lewis Homes exP Pedestrian environments: cremation 'of activity centera as p Because of the width of Foothill Boulevard and the volume iOf traffic on the street," Lewis Homes feels that pe. :plazas/amenities should occur on the "interior of th project. Staff agxees that plates/amenities shoulcl occur within the project )tut also, in. ,''eeping with the Footh.'ill Boulevard Specific` Plan (F'BSp), along the activity ceni er frontage. Additionally, the buildings should be designed 'With chitecture (as suggested by Lewis Homes) and �a60 degree ar should relate to Foothill' Boulevard a-� the pedestrian level Zt may not be necessary to provide`shop,openings directly out _ jjo Foothill Boulevard but passageways into the site and,, I{torefront designs should;.be considered along the activi'y center frcYntage. The butl�ings should not "turn the'_r thck'° � ,i to Foothill Boulevard. f f B. Landscaping - The: landscape design proposed for the Design I Supplement is identical -to the Foothill Boulevard.Specific Plan. In reviewing thin concOrt, gewis $omen has raised oI questions about the design of' the activity center and parkway transition areas. They feel, that the Crape Myrtle trees used at the activity center `should be placed within t�,a Parkway with' F'3ouble'row of evergreen ca-LOPY used behind ,the Crtsoe Myrtle; ,- They stated that the Crape Myrtle walknever b'com- laxge enough for people to walk _ercer or create a canopy Over the sidewalk. Per 'City Council: direction, the can-opt proposed is extracted from the Doothill Boulevard Specific plan in- order to`:Y"tie" togetuter the corridor. If t-'ie Commissiori',,, 'feels ,,that changing tl•.e concept should be consiilered,:^t-.he'entire Foothill' corridor ehotld be.rev3swed simultansonsly t maintain the ooatinuity of, Foothill Bon:9vnrd, /fr The parkway transition design along Foatihill $oulevard, consists tiof flowarIng plum tre`�s in a 75- tug 150-foot area situated ,Yiatwerh the f7rmal planting of CrAPe Myrtles at r, rr ;4 ' PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT' DDA 91-01,-�- CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA Y July 10,`"1991 Page 3 `f activi4y cc:atersy and the informal planting of Landon��� W z treEL? within the-suburban`pexkways., Lewis Homes has raised: the issues that creating a suece3sful trans$,tion requires tl intermixing 0£ the Crape Myrtle and London Plane, rather than` the .introduce on of a•third tree spe'i,,S. wltijIe staff does na: disagree with this idea, claang�o the` tree' palette within-Y ,the Wssing link" should onl, re considered in conjunction ;with„ changes-to the?,Foothill Boulevard Specific P'_an� Additionally, the flowering Plum is note an approved street tree and the pre.£erence. of the Engineering Division' would be nL to upe'it within:Ithe city Ia sight-of-was" V mentioned ,at ')he pre�tous Planning C. Street,, Furnxtuss„ As /� Commission meeting, the selection o£ '+ StJ;eet Furniture: P3lecte £or;;Foothill Boulevard is on the Plan ing Division`s work, programs Because no palette has been approved, ` referendes to particular 'tYPes of, fur{,7 turn Java been eliminateck from the Design Supplement. C ce a palette is approved by'the Gesign Review co);Mittee and the Panning Commission,- the Street Furniture 'palette will become an IjJ attachment to the°Design Supplement. RE�COMMENDATI02�•s: Sta£f Yeccmmends that the I•launing Cc_ cis-liaa review the,prop, Design supplement and recommend approval of review t a� Aistxict Amendment 91-()I,. Boulevard Specific plan Amendment ,?1w01, Terra Vista Cc=Mity Plan Amendment`"91-01, Victor .,Community; Plan Amendment,.,9 i 01, and Ind. ,trial Area Specific Plan ' Amendment 91-04 and issaance of a 'Negatigs ` x� ,Denidra�icn to the'City: C0L710il• _ Respec ly rubftitted, /j Bra Hut !' City Planner y' ! BB SM:mlg Attachmants: Jxhibit ".A" Foothill Ba3ledard Design Supplement Resolution;Recomnendiug Al;lroval of DbA 91-01 �C_solutici Recommending Approval of FASR A 91-01 1 ,escliltion Recommending Approval of TVCPA 91-01 4 :tsblution RecV4mmend!ng Aklprbv 4f VCPA 91-01 y L al o£ ISDA 0-04,. . Resolution`Reeomtuendinq a patf?v �, t� ,. . •.�.; �- �� y C r , ��1� �� -' � •+' �.� - _ �� r ��. r �� ��I r _ � ►ter � ��:• t _� �s � 1 f �._` a� 1as.�y' ���*1 ���.1�'i�K✓fi//ter ��r� ��j.�' { r ��r :'Y � "t� - ,� r^` 3 r '■ A Fy � ., .tl�ll����` iii:�. -..6..ri:.� Y �' '�' `, FOO OO THI L BOO ULE AR , �+ .. � IG SUP ' LE E T ,. ., ;. ,, r DESIGN WENT ding the Terra Vista Comnu4ty Victoria tkif munity First,Pnd IndusUlai k Specific Man. I I i`l L I 1. INT'RO ICTI N MMAT IS [HIS SUPPLEMENJ ABQU72 On September 1e,1987,the City Council approved the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan(FBSP).The FBSP was enacted to provide'a ur,fied development scheme for th6,oothillBoulevard corridor through the community.Of prime importance to the FBS't'are the special shwtscape d rovisions which"tie" together the visual ispects of this commercial roadway. •Mlssing Link, Aida Yictnria\a Terrb Vista oOff Industrial Specific Pion ay ui ni ui . W � O Figure 7-Missing Link ATea The portion of Foothill Boulevard betwee• :'even Ave I iIle and the Inter%ate 15 F,reeway iT 15)was not a part of the specific plan study;therefore i s prr-nsior.-did not apply to tb2 develop,°+ent of this"miss- ing link"'At the time of the FBSP approval,tlr C:ty Council Lad Ph mung Commission emrwed a;desire tr) include significant design provisions o:the plan in the development of the"missing ic"This amendment to the Terri Vista Community Plan(TIrCP),the Victorij Community Plan(VCP),and the Industrial Area Specific PIan(ISP)is proposed to include specific streetscape design pmvW<)x s of the FBSP in the develop- ment of the properties adjacent to Foothill Boulevard. WHERE DOES IT APPLY? The followingp,-ovisionsivill apply to all properties bordering Foothill Boulevard within the TVCP, VCP,and ISP.This amendment augments the development regulations and standards of the TVCP,VCf,and ` ISP.When an issue,condition,or t-.aationoccurs vrhich is not covered or provided for in this amendment or`' provisions of the r/CP,/CP,or ISP,the regulations of the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga thai are most applic ble to the issue,condition,or situation shall apply. suPPLEMENTPRF 'Paget .. 7191 y} 1 I COMMUNITY 1?,ES�!M CONCEPT The Foot'-M Boulevard Design Supplement is irtended to t end the concepts of the Fb6dilll Boule- vard Specific Plan to the"missing link"through the'ereation of a d c concoun,2 that is,att;active and of high quality with a unifying community design image reflective of the cominunfty heritage and identity, providing an economically viable setting for a balanced mixture of commercial and residential uses with safe, Efficient arc*".ation acid acres= r A. Create a community image that expresses and enhances the unique character and identity of Rancho Cucamonga. :43 08Ji=trT ES• Develop a streetscape system whichdesignates major intersections as activity centers and er"iphasizes the suburban parkways between the activity centers as vehicular areas. Promote compatible building elevations which afford a human scale atpedestrim._;yeas and provide transitions to buildings of greater height,while protecting adjoining residential conditions. Promote appropriate landscape treatments throughout the corridor,particu3arl3r those that are low maintenance,drought tolerant,and wind resistant within intense urban conditions. Provide for thecontrot of risuaW objectionable vievis,such as outdoor storage and loading areas,through site desi and I screening. C. POLICIES: Deve3op consistent streetscape and architectural palettes which are sensitive to creating a"heritage statement statement for Foothiil'8oulevard. Require compliance with community design guidelines in plans for new development and expansion or redevelopment of existing development and make community design a major consideration in site plan review and approval. Ut;!L-&landscape materials which are clean,safe,wind resistant,and relatively low maintenance Formal forms and configurations should be utilized at activity center nodes while lessiormal configurations ,mould be utilized throupi�out the parkwaylin3cs between nodes. Designate s%ecial landscape and architectural feature at major intersections.Combine thematic plantings with.�, temporary architectural statemenpi designed to promote a distinctive character for the activrty -.leis.Charrbes in pavingmaterials,lighting;sig`ung,and siting of adjacent str:ktures should Drew -aiir l ' tersections to enhance their diianctiven f vet - �_ Page 3 su + wu` 1IL DESIGN GUIDELINES A. ACTIVITY CENTERS: - Activity centers are Velected intersections along the Foothill Boulevard corridor defined as M?eWe".or "StMemenV areas which"tie"together the visual aspc-cu al-the Foothill Boulevard corridor through tiw aNj; <) promote concentrated aN_vity at these areas;mod:give identity and tl�me to the arts in which they are located.The activity centers are:ocated Atiguous to Foothill Boulevard as'it\,dirated in Figtr:a2 ACTIVITY CENTERS iW eLU Z W W Q :S J. W ck Eigurs 2-Activftyy Center Locations Because three comers of the Haven Avenue intersection are fully or partia!lydeveloped,the devel- opment provisions of the activity mater are limited to those striae"pe and landscaF..improvements within the public right-of-wzy'Therefore,many of the f61Owing standanas apply only to the 1like ' .tnue and Rochester Avenue activity centers S. Sttre-tscape: \ a. Allbuilding orientatimis will relate to the Foothill Boulevard frontage:The building setback area3 will be enh...-ed pedestrian i(,sles with cpx�cial j' dscape materials,formal landscape arrange- ments,and pedestrian level lighting. b.2 Stn-etscape elemens such as bollards,crosswalks with spedA paving inetmials,light l� starnia::9s,and street furniture should be uniform dunughout the FoothillFoulevard corridor. C. The concept within the activity meter is:o incorporat--a` rr_;ai,regularly spaced, street tree planting system utilizing a palette of lnfurmally shaped,colorful`trRs; d The urban or formal streetscape design characteristic of the`activiVicenter should Extend along Foothill;:toulevard and secondary/intersecting streets Ni a point of logical transition to the suburban parkway. ire,%'.i;iR design will extend to at least the fu:),t drivrway or as modified thrp*the design review process.,The extent o;the urban streetscape should be able to adjusu,to changes in publI riglet- of-way condiderLs,such as right turn lanesand bus bays. _ Pagq 7 �� 7191 Situ planrt4'. Amok a. At activity centers,bui?dhags may be placed`At or adjacent to the front setback line to create a more appealing,active street-acape.Front yard areas of parldng lots dominating the stneetscene are specifically prohilrited. b. Multi-story buildings shall be designed to relne to the pedestrian level.All ground story facade..shall be designed to aerate to the buman scale ibis can be jcrnmplisbed through the breaking `of facades into bays and the signage,brought down in.size and locsation.Furth,this redzuchon in scale car.be established through the use of elements which add havizontal•articulation W the facades:Examples of these, elements include pedestrian arcades and awnings.,awnlags.,fMiilileen&-Aochester only.) C. Buildings shall.be designed to elim3rcaces fraBniented,strip commercial appearance and should be oriented to the activity center{ A kena_*Rochester unlyl. ;. d. Architecture acid outdoor spaces along Foafhili Boulevard shall beintegmMy designed and oriented toward the pedestrian experience.The experience shod`i be visually diverse and stimulating and should include activities tha create a sense of variety and intereatvMilliken&Rochester only). ,r e. Structures,pathways,and landscaping shall be rr Wrporatea'within the site so as to ensure ease ofacwks from one site to adjoining sites in a safe manner BuiltlU-GoothM Boulevard n d-of entrences e ll�designed d dtect en mes d;teimm logical pedestrian separations from 'gh y y trances frown Foothill Boulevard,separations in the buildings that allow a ess to the interior plaza areas,or other appropriate methods ., Archite..,tural Concept: a: Within individual activityy tenter,.the archite -ral style should W c6.1stent to provide continuity of design at the intersectiom iWl&en Aeivity C=mr-M%t%e,are mo exu-ft buildings lecated at the Milliken activity center intersn�om Asa result,the Acveropment Review process will e3tablish the flavoribi thearea when reviewing the de rwlopment proposals.Net?deee"opments need not"duplicate the architectural style of previous submittaI0,nt must bemmpaatMe in temtsofarchitectnzeand Agmn tatibYe wlth the other cor,wx(s)of the inte4, a. RodmterAcevity Co.r►ter-New proposals, ii onsider and re4Qectthe architectural style of existing buildings.For example,tkt Aggazzotti Winery at the sgiitheast corner of.. Foothill and Roan •c:r,is: tial National Hstoric Registry caldidate.Anyp'b).r.-Ws for this Activity, center should beet _(gnedtobecrompatibhwiththisstructumIlds'doesnot'meantrrtnewpropasaisrr'►vst emulate the an la(r,aural style of the winery but,rather,that they rr r+st complement e) sftgbuildings. b. DUferenthte tie ground floor fAcades from tttav- zond floor in recognition of the differenczs in the dwacter of acth ties at tf b�ound floor level.Exam' winclude,but are not limited to the use of storefront ghasi, Wedfiack ortiez,!vr.-oms,2eiigstration,';;nd other appropriate architectural features facing Foothill Boulevart.�Ailh7cen Avenue,wnd Rr-&,,esier Avenue. a A iV 7191 PAge . SUPFUMIFXW,!` 701-02 .,i LY �C1 1 91 P�C. RG�I��A � � 3 of 9 � 4. ;,i-SnascaoCdoncept:Theactivity'ceniersshallbedistinguis�ifromsuburban(informal) parkway areas throu`'gh the use of formal,urban tree plantings These fcemal plantings shall border z i activity centers and shall define these areas as heinghigher intensity,urban districts.The plantings shall consist of an offset double tutu of Crape Myrtle(Yageestroet.,!a indi;-a)t**ees along each ML-d frontage.Addi- ,,r tionalplant materials(evergreen` aees,pa —s,etc.)may be, Itroduced to supplement the Crape Myrtle as a i:,ackdrep.The type and locaLon of the additional materials should be based on:the particular bedding design,:scale,and setback. RrMW' i % NYAF meC'srxww�, »reuu wr�.�wt✓, c , .Yscx7rorro�»;• \ !2 rf�-Nct�rrnc�atd � H/1Yf14L �%_X3C' rXMlN YD2i�Aii1?Y-`7= 1.iFYE2Xj.F 70l�' .YKi4Y N+k+Ws'n � i iY7NR+�i.V'D.. ,Lyxpp� '3'Fftl�r .fiYIC�I-k9,Yd✓? � • as r L s AM4'AJtA7AA-•JJ)YL w /�bVAY ii� {�'/` :h'IPA'n.N.xo-ltav: �x�wwcc �fTn4c.us.ci�nr Rgary r 1 H ' 1 \ �" Figure 3-Actitrity Center Ct:iaceptrslExalptes suMtFr+ u ffpage 6'� t i� B. 999MAN P,RKMEM: 1. Str�etsca�pe: j'� a. `,The paikwa�s will be designed with informal dusters of trees,rc`Urtig t urf berms,and s;teanderirtg/undulatingsidewalksevokingpastoral,suburbanc}e:alities. l J' \ b. Sire etscape element,;such as bollards,crosswalks with specs'««' t standards, W.street furniture shall be identic�,,,p style and finish to those used in-thuFBSP aied 2. Architi c-tUral Compt: / 1 a. The architectural characteristics steallbegoverned�jffhee?';stingstar{: :�fthe Developer ent Code,TVCP,Y�;and ISP. 1� i b. In situations wheie buildings are highly visible from the side streets and/or adjacent parking areas,special emphasis shall be placed on creatingardutectural interest 3. Lnd'scape concept:The plantings will consist of ir`ommal treatments,dominated by London Plate(Platanus acerifolia),C.afifornia Sycamore(Fla anc s rac�emosa),and Flowering Pl:arat(Pranus cerasifera)trees.Other species maybe used to accent and/or ,Qirpplt nent+thesr designated tree types The typo and location of these species should be reviewed in conjunction with sNcific development proposals. C. AY TF$APi5MgMS: In order to provide a graduaftransitionfrom theurban activity centers to the suburban informal parkways,"parkway transitions"will be introduced aloe. : coredor. Parkway transitions are designed fablend tha ormail hardscape and tree planting pattern of the activity centers with the informal landscak,and bardscape treatment of the suburban parkways.Specifically,the parkway transition is characterized j a 75-foot to 150-foot zone,dominated byRowering Plum trees.Other tree species may be introduced to.upplernent the Rowering Plum to assist in creating a smooth transition. t1 p, :I :.<s .•r �\sitVJb'iuw�vr�r,airlr'aovas+as \ i .+e�.r�ar w�1y Meandering Sidawaik Primary Parkway Accent Tree(Flowering Plumy Tree(Sycamore) Mounded Turf r� Figure 5 Perinlaay TpRnsltion 7141 Page } ac�areuav�wxt D. GENERAL E31312E1-1iJJM � 1 Site Planning: 1; a. Buildings sball be sited to create new pedestrian spaces that complement and expand fte existing pedestrian rights-of-way along Foothill Boulevard.This can be accomplished by creating plazas and allovving wider sidewalks on the boulevard. b. ;, Buildings shall be designed and placed to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. Driveways and serdce areas shall be located to avoid interfl ing with the flow of pedestrian circulation in and amimd the sib-' ..r c. All auto related facilities fi.e.working bays,storage,etc)shall be oriented/screened away frompubiic view. d. Buildings should be oriented to encourage restaurants,services,limited retail uses(as permitted by the applicable Community or Specific Plan),and other high intensity pedestrian uses on the ground levels of all buildings withhi activity centers. 2. Barking felts: a. Whenever possible,entries shall be located on side streets in order to minimize pedes- trian/vehicular conflicts.When ihisis not possible,theFootiii"Boulevard site entry shallbe designed with appropriately patterned concrete or pavers(behind the public, 4t-of way)to differentiate it from the sidewalks. \t b. Parking access points,whether lo<eted on Yoothill Boulevard or side streets,shFf'l be located as far from street intersections as possibly C. Parldng areas shall be designed so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving vehicles and minimize the need,for the pedestrian t,n cross parking aisles. d. Individual project parking-areas shall be linked with on-site driveways which are clearly identified and easily reeorpized as connectors.New development projects`c'un delineate on all plans where vehicular connections to adjacent propertties are located.Ttse applicant must also demonstrate jiovi- sions for access easements for such vehicular movements to adjacent properties consistentrovith approved master plans. e. Parking areas shall be designed in a manner which link the building to the street sidewalk system to encourage and facilitate pedestrian movement.This can be accomplished by using design features such as wx'-kways with enhanced paving,trellis structures,and/or landscape treatments. 3. Landscape Design: a. All street furniture,light,O=dards,bollards,and similar hardware within 10 feet of. the public right-of-svay shall be}sainted a color chosen_as the Foothill Corridor Theme Color.Sign faces may k vary and match related architecture. i b. A colorful landscape edge shall be established at the base of buildings+Asphalt edges a; at the base of structures are prohibited.Plant materials in containers are appropriate. Alk sul+Pu_ue aia Page 8 J 7,s1 r C. Internal ped(,strian circulation,linking office complexes with neighboring eommer 13111, - cial or office developments,should t located close to buildings.,, d. Pkm!ing clusters should assume a non uniform arrangem-nL The diversity of mawing types should be gnat enough to provide interest but kept to a level which evokes a relaxed,natural Whig to the o serve*. e. Water conserving plantings and irrigation shall be used in all landscaped areas. (Refer to City Ordinance No.411-Xeiscape.) r K. Streetea W'6'ghting: a. 'It is the intent of streetscape lighting to add a consistent,planned look for Foothill Boulevard during day and evening hours.Lighting can have a dramatic effect on the quality of the streetscape design. ' b. i a lighting fixtures in the public right-of-waychall be consistent along Foothill Boulevard and approved Jy the City Engineer following recommends,!ioks of the Planning Commission. Materials shall be consist-it and in keeping with the desired theme.Fi ales and supporting har3ware shall be consistent with City stand,,.rds. } c. All developmer:areas outsid9 the public righ`,rof:way shall usa high pressure i sodium lighting.All direct light raysshall be confined to the limits of tAe building site. V1. ' L i IMIPRO"VEM,ENTS A- Centg[Median PP U Based upon traf&,.analyses,a continuors 14-footwide raised landscaped median shall be provided on Foothill Euulevard.The median can provide benefits necessary to acnomaodate increased development and traffic demand in the following areas: ® Increased vehicuWz apacity' N Increased vehicular/pedestrian safety ® Increayd vehicular mobility a Increased vehicular level of service Median breaks sbal%';mur only at major signalized intersections as determined by the City Engineer. Alternate,median breaks may ere considered subject to a detailed traffic safety analysis and subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. B. it?dden Desitt7-T'ha 14-foot snide median shall be designed to provide access control and a unifying landscape statement.The median will feature two basic types of planting.Accent tree planting (Csdpe myrtle),underplanted with a lose evergreen groundmver,will be provided at median noses.Eves- green trees(Phus lances),underplanted with shrubs and groundcover,will be planted throughout the balance of then median.,(See Figure 6.)� 7.9t Page 99 stuattwet .. MEDIAN ACCENT TREES" (CRAPE'MYERTLE)TRIfINGUl�Ak SPACING �. AT IS!O.C. N S•CURB W/91;'CONCRETE P��tER; �OdTEriAtx EDGE E°3M LANCEA 30*O.C. : lR;JOR EVERGREE6Q;TREE M7T--EXPANSXY* CE CG�NCRETl.PAVERS N jlONTMORTAR BED L 2%1 P 2% CONCRETE CM-+ r ! 'i DETAIL SEC' EQS BITS PARKWAYIMMAN ACCENT FREE, CRAPE MYRTLE MAJOR EVEn'Y,REEN MEDIAN TREE LANCER) +` Sl6MUSSIGROUND COVER 6•CURB WfIW NARDSCAPE 5 D`CLEAR ZONE MANTENANCE EDGE 4. EE-W MR�.TREE SETBACK FROfi1 EDGE OF MANTENANCE EDGE r`r f £s EQ. ? EO. SECTION '4 0' TYPICAL W BLOCK LOCATION Figure 6-Median Design SumEMD"m Page 7/91 t2 ,r V. SITE DEVELOPMENT ,STANDARDS " �- �iSaacks-�ttivi 8 Cs3ntt;ra'(�tsfzuris ;n Rarit�uav Irs faarer�thesisl Building X f ldefll gctFloor - 2ttd f16ar P'o�kinv Foodtill/Milli1ce 1 Activity Center) j i.Foott3ll 2T(45) 25' 45'(45'av&W min) ' 9 Milliken 25'f ) 25'( ) 45'(45 av&XY min) Foothill/Rochester Activity Center: w Foothill 25'(45') ,45'O 45'(45'avg, 0'aun) Roc�4ester 25'(*) 45'O `45'(45'avg,30'min) (1) As measured from ultimate curb face W.Refer to TVCP,VCP,orISP for regulations i \\�1:1 Buli'iing Setback Ratio 2nd Story Pannitted at Milliken , •/ Z�1 70� Figure 7-Activity Center Building Setback �avt Page 11 SUPPLUmm;4 'I jl Rear Propedyiz= IWIdiU9 karklog ® Adjacent to Existing or } Planned Residendal 25'(*) is,(�) —Development ®Adjacent to existing or Planned Commercial 0'M , 5'W Development �1 SntgTior Side F.ey� ,rtno 'Parking ®Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25'(*) IT( ) 0 Adjacent to Existing or Planned Coavnerciat Development $'( ) T( ) V B. Heiaht Limitati®M i- an ACtiuitu C ., 3�r191 I ® Wit hin 45 1 of sf¢eet curb face: Foothill Boulevard(at Miilik 35'= ,Foothill Boulevard(at Rochester) 20' Milliken Avenue 89' Rochester Avenue 20` 8'Within 100'ofsingi t'.idiyresidentiaidistrict 25' ®.(hherlocations ( ) ® Tower;,campaniles,rotundas (1) Refer to TVCP,VCP,ISP for suburban parkway areas.. (*)Refer,to TVCP,VCP,or ISP for regulations p suPPLEUMMW r, j Page 12 6r 719i _ uiuj 1 JLGlSYOl Y /Vjb � ,i i C6 PCD On J� a I ^ g v a i � v %1)4 �-j f annMOMMIMan 003 1 ! 1 Dal I ! m u I @'-1 r ——— waaccwcucecuucuua I ,;( � �,.• Z . — '�WJur Mva.�7or w" 1 ---r Ls1 �( I i• 1 ! ti, U r' � f'r tis � }� (EXHIBIT A-2 S DEMIARX TABLE OF PERN-11TTE (X) e� 1DTTi0� i t�' PFo�t►TTh[1 nth CSF� 11 -' Subares One Subarea Two !l1 Subarea Three;; Subarea.-Four RETAIL COMMEPCTAL USES SC cc O'is P SC f( ice GTg MHdR rf.lC'C CO LMR MP..U MU CC RRC k) T cL Ant!Que ShopsI X X ; ' Apparel: r: 4 a) Boutiques X X X X X X X X x b) General: X X X X X x X X Appliance Stores and Repair X X X X R Art, Music, and Photographic Studio g --Supply Stores X X X X X X X X X `X« 0 =i Auto Service Station 0 0 S?_SL 0 O O 0 0 Auto Service (including' motorcycles, boats, trailers, :_campers): a) Sales (with ancillary-repair -' facilities) 0 0 0 0 0 b) Rentals.) 0 0 0, 0 O c) Minor Repair (does not include major engine work.; muffler shops, painting, body work, upholstery, etc.) O 0 O' 0 0 d) Coin-op Washing 0 0 0 e) Automatic Washing 0 0 b fL Parts and Suottlies X X X X X Bakeries bail only) X X X X t r� `i x X X Barber and Beauty Shops X X X X X X X X k—' X X X• X Bed and Breakfast O 0 O 0 O 9 0 O 0 Bicycle Shoes i X X X X X� X _ X Xa Blueprint and Photocopy Services X X X 7t l„X x X Book, Gift, and Stationary Stores (other than aduTtl�ylated material) X X X X X X X X X X X X 0 Candy _and Confectionaries X X X -X X X X X X X- at rin a&J1jbmenis X X X X X X China a ware Stores X X sC'X X X X X+ Christmas Tree Sales Lots (0 rating; on a t porary basis) X 7( X X Churches 0 O O O O O` O O O O D 0 0 p Cleanine & Prt+sin¢ Establishments X X X X X X X X x X 0 Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) includin¢ relate ntertanm nt O O O O O' n O O `O O O 0 i Commetcial Recreation: a) Indoor uses such as bowling and billiards O O O 'O O O O O 0 b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball O O O O " 0 0 0 0 Convalescent Fae. .. tioapitals r O O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 O 0 Curtain and Drapery:+Shoes X X X X X X X Day Care CeTza O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Delicatessetty%& Specialty Food { Stores ,j X X X X X X X "X Xe Drug Stores and. Pharmacies over 10,000 sq. ft. X X X X X X o Pharmacies with or without AWL specialty retail under , 10,000 So. ft, O 0 0 y Educational institutions, parochial ^f' Private (including colleges and r� yn universities). cz a� f V ::.0 r iv-9.4a EXHIBIT A-3 SY`tttl4Ry T.1Rr>: (1i' PFrtvtTcED l''i awn rr,\\, -- Subarea One Subarea f�`� 13ETAB COhlhiFRrrat rrca onto Sr Subarea Three S.barca F,_: � .�5�tiyP;SC CC O hlg2 tiHR cr rr rn r hm *�s_CC RR �1R Lt Ct Farmers_4(arkets X X Floor Covering Shops X x X Florist Shone Furniture Storei X X X X x x X X x X X X Y X X Hardware Storer X X X X x Y Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight R d r in¢ liri a X O X n Hobby Shoos X X Sc X X X 7t X X• III !ce-f ram Ctor c & Cod-'Fountains X sr X X X x x x x bnjLQzLjt cervices and S�opltes__ X X- X X n Jewelry Stores X X Laundry iSelf Sn i — X X X x X X X x x O X T either Co de and ins¢ ¢e Stores X x X X X X X x L1 aries and -i scums, public and private 0 Liquor Stores O O O O O O O M cc n¢ r and Wire SCrrvi"u X -X fx X x X Y v Mortuaries S Cemetaries Music, Dance, and Martial Arts -CWd(oc 6 X O x O X N wcoaner and A!a.a�inr, x x x SenrP� x }; 7C X X X .. Nurseries & Garden Supply Stores --within enclosed area x x X ffice, Business Machine and iComn ter omnonent Ctores X x y( yr W X x X Y X Parking facilities (com- w`ti mercial) where fees are charged Parks and recreation faciities Public a2d private G Per Shops X X �x X x ]t Photocoov X' X x x X X Political or philanthropic heQdquarters 0 Private and public clubs a d lodges, including YMCA, ywCA, and silhilar youth group,uses &cord and Tape Stores x X x x x X' x X X - 1� Recreational vehicle 1 storage yards 1 Restaurants (sit down); a) With entertainment and/or serving of alcoholic beverages 0 0 0 0 04 0 0'Q O 0 0�� Incidental serving of leer and - f _ wine (without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment, or dancing) X X 0 X X 0 X X 0 O x x x c) Cafe, limited to 20 seats (including outdoor seating) X X X X X X x X X 0 x x 8 d) Fast Food wtlh drive-thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- without d :rhru O Q n P1"'� G O 0 O O EXH1131T A-4 �\ S SUMMARY TABLE OF PER > AtiD CO`DiTI 1� r rY P R%fITTEQ Q t St:c Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Fon: Shoes Stores- c t X X X X ! CC RR C MR t OaP Specialty Rey i X X X X X O f t O O O O p Sporting Goods Stores: a) Specialty; backpacking, tennis, skiing, moue— b) General; encompassing a Y X variety of snorts epuioment X X X X X Supermarkets _�C X X X X Swimming-Pool Su21Zlies `X X X X X Z-- r Shous X X X X _X X X X Television, Radio, VCR, Stereo and Component Salce X X X X X Toy S34Ces X X X X X X X X Variety Department Stores, Junior } Department Stores O X ° —O X O X _`Xc" X Veterinary,,(domestic) a) Non-boarding X O X O X X O X X 0 b) Boarding �,' � p C) O p Watch and In Repair Stores X X X X X X' X X X X* Yardatte Goods Stores X X yf X X Vocational or business r trade schools 0 Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four ENTERTAINMENT&Cl rr rQ t- rSES SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR hM c CC M r aru aria rr Mr r Arcad&c O p p p- O O O O Cultural/Artist Exhibits: a) Indoor gallery and art sales X O X X O X X li. b) Outdoor art exhibits X O X O X O p Discothegues' O O p p Theaters: a) Dinner theater O O O O O O O O b)b), Movie--theater O O O p p ;) " Subarra One Subamea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four OFFICE& ADMINISTRATIVE USES SC=Q MR p SC CQO MR MIdR S^ =_LhdR MR tr MU CC RC!yM t t o Administrative. Business, and Professional OfEie X X X X X X X X X X X X• X Banks, Finance Services & Institutions without drive-thru X X X X X X X X X O X X X - with drive-hru O O O O O O O 00 Business and Office Services X X X X X t %ix x ;J_. X Y' Interior Decorating Firms X X X X X X ) X X X X- Medical/Dental Offices & Related I n .. Onucian and Optometrical Chime Y,TK Realtors and Real Estate Offi X, -' X X X X X X X, X , x Travel Agencies- � :X X X X X X X X X X• X EXHIBIT A-5 SUMMARY TAB1'.F. (DF PFRMiTTET1 (M IND C'ONn>TI0NA .T.Y PFitiLiITTED tFll iSF.0 C;r Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea "tbig,. TLESIDENT IAL TSFS � ."\_ SC CC O MR P SrCrQMRMT.W SCCC rn I R MTt I, Sine7e Fami y Detached X X X X Single Family Attached (duplex, fouro]er.) '` X X X' X X X X jKtrlt Family Dwellings X X F i-jx X X Ancillary Residential Uses: 2) Home-care facilities (6 or less) '" X X X X X X X b) On-site private recreation . facilities X X X X 'X X X Accessory Uses.- a) Accessory structures X X X , X X X X W Home oc unatiefn X X X X X X X Subarea One. Subarea Two Subarea Three z Subarea Four P_UBLTC USES Se CC O MR P SC CC n MR I'm SC CC r>n r wan r ro tI lNIICC RRC MR 1.10 Trc_it Facilities0 Public Utility TtlstallatjMs X Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four TEL USES' SC CC O MR P SCCCONEMB SC CC Cn r u R M U*n CC.ttRCVRLl 0 otel/Motel O X p' Hotel Facilities lmaiorl X Ancillary Uses:. a)' Beauty/Bu&,r Shop X b) Cafes X c) Catering Services O d) Cocktail Lounge G 0 Conference/Convention (_Q J Facilities f) Florist Shops X g) Gift Shops X h) Newspaper/Magazine Stores X Q Pharmacies X j) Restaurants (sit down) X k) Tourist Information X 11 Travel Aeeneiee X. Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea_Four INDUSTRIAL USES SCCCONEP SC CC n t frry SCCCCOLIMRMRUMU CC RRC m R u All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Sub-area 7 of the Indastr;al Arta. Specific Plan (ISP). •Refer to RRC note(•)Section 9.9.2 EXHIQIT A-6 ,+cYvoar n++s2assc I+2vd.'h7". - °D (' dL Mw zj *.Jl Z — OLfL19Ag�� � _ e (; —7'r e ul j, {( c 3 11 W o ? c a g O a h 3 .3 w � v W s p C J , m i wGO Gi lu t`. EXHIBIT A-? ri f f lJ f ,, !� �aeetines��raoe�rsrner�®ara�n ,�,�m�sreenrmrse���,; Q I � I ��ros�c ieagaR'o _ SUB-AREA 4 ACTIVITY-, CENTER t ` SUB-R t�EA D�- ESlC � .>?T S.R M NDARD5 ; = AND CMD USE=REGPLATION 1Y-9559 cSOBAKtA FuuK } EXll lIRIT�f Q l n hI- r ell y 9.9 SUBAREA FOUR LANES USE RE G ILATAONS 9.9,1'- Primary Function/Location I i d ti ' Subarea Four is located contiguous to the 1 l � 4C�c�PlJJ[;3I - 1; Foothill Cot-,ridor,' between the Oevore �- . l 1�: Freewa'; and East Avenue. Subarea Hour acts as a major gateway into the �>? � � _4 _ `►iLl '� cite of Rancho Cucamonga"and is char- acterized by a variety of ccmmercial, ! ( ! l~ residential, industrial uses, and mixed i use/residential- Regional related u-zs sa.ill I t I be provided adjacent to the 4evare Fine- - \ way. ,designed to compliment the Victoria ; Gardens Regional Shopping Center. i,�_Afarr.C�-6orr�ewv The following matrix establishes the uses '— ^i ICU, r which are permitted (X)., conditionally I permitted (0), or not permitted in eactti'" i of the five affected land use, ( a subcategories. '-'"1 I e NOTE: Site Development Standards Section 9.9.3.2 and 9.9.3.3 shall apply to' shaded areas only. SUE-AREPL 4 -- ACTIVITY CENTER MAP . r:;3 Y" Ca,atnJt a. -I' ' f EXH351T A-9` 9.9.E 1 Permitted and Conditional Uses Fietali Commercial Uses - Lan�_Y CC RRC MR LI,** o Antique Shops Appa*el Stores:;` a)- Bout X X b) C,en�ra( X Appliance Snores and Repair X X Art, Music, and Photographic Studios') and Supply Stores �,' ` X X* o Auto Service Station'- O 0 : Service (inc!udiro- motorcycles, boats, trailers and campers: j� a) Sales (with ancillary ; repair facilities) _ 0 0 b) Rentals,. 0 0 c) Minor Repair (does, po-,. Include major engine work, muffler sho", painting, body work, u holste P ry, etc.) O 0 �) Coin-cp Washing 0, 0 e) Automatic Washing 0 .. 0 f) Parts and Supplies X X Bakeries (retail only) X '; Barber and Beauty Shops X X* x Bed d' s an Br eakfast.,t 0 Bicycle Sharps X Xk Blueprint and Photo Copy S,►rvices X X x Book, Gift, and Stationary Stores C X o (other than adult related material) Candy and 'Confectioneries X Caterirg Establishments X n China and Glassware Stores X* SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS r AND LAND"USE REGULATION IV SUBAREA FOUR EXHIBIT A-10 Retail Commercial Uses Continued Land Use CC RRC MR L 1** 0 0 Christmas free/Pumpkin Shies lots Operated on a Temporary Basis X Churches 0 O / 0 Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X 0 Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) L' nciuding related entertainment 0 O' 0 Commercial Recreation: a) ' indoor uses Such as boNling, bliliards 0 0' b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball O 0 0 Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals O 0 O 0 Curtain D ,,. and _ra er 5ho�s X X F y Day Ca':a Centers 0 0 0 Delicatessens-and Specialty Fox..-Stores k X Dn Stores and Pharmacies X X Educational institutions parochial, li private (including collrges and universities) 0,, Farmers Markets X X rx Florist Shops 1' X X x (4 Floor Ctwering Shops X X c� Furniture Store_ x X Hardware Stores X X Health and Athl' tie Gyms,and Weight Reducing Clinics X X* X Hobby Shops X X Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X. X* jewelry Stores X X' Janitorial Services and Supplies X X* o Laundry (Self-Sefwlce) X t! Leather Goods and Luggage Stored X X G EX141BI ° -11 Retall Commercial Uses - Commercial 'tL t Land U>::e CC .f,'ZRC MR Ll*: o Libraries and .museums, public and private p Liquor Stores p Messenger and Wire Services X X* Mortuaries and cemetaries p as Music, Dance, and Martial . r Arts Studies X Newspaper and Magazine Stores X X* Nurseries and Garden"Zupply,Stores Within Enclosed Area X X Office, Business Machine and Computer Component Stores X X o -y Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores X X p - narking facilities (com- mercial) where fees are charged p Parks and recreation facilities, public and primate p Pet Shops X X* Photocopy (Xerox) X.- X* Private and public clubs and lodges, including YMCA, YWCA, and similar Youth group uses p Political or rYnilanthropic headquarters f, p Recreational vehicle storage yards q Record and Tape Stores X X Restaurants (sit down): a) With entertainment and/or the serving'of alcoholic beverages O 0 p b) incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocktail'iounge,,bar, entertainment, or dancing) ,y. X X c) Cafe, limited to 20 seats -- ._ (lnciv'ing outdoor seating) X X X d) Fast Food (with drive-thru) 0 0 0'A f (Wlthor�t drive-thru) 0 0 p f SUB-AREA bESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION. r cX6H1B9Y A- 92 Retail Commercial Uses - Contin "tci Land Use CC / RC MR L1** p Shoe Stores and Sh6iR Rcpalr Shop:; X X . Specialty Retail q f Sporting Goods Stores: '1 a) Specialty; backpacking, X X tennis, skiing,mountain- eering, fishing; etc.) _ b) General; encompassing a X X variety of sports a equipment Supermarkets X X Swimming Pool Services and Sales X X T&ilor Shops X Television, Radio, VCR, Stereo, and CDComponent Sales X X , Toy Stores X X r_ Variety Department Stores, Junior Department Stores X X,; Veterinary (domestic): a) Non-boarding X X o h) Boarding q q Vocarcional or business trade schools p Watch,and Clock Repair�Shops X X* Yardige Goods Stores X X Enterbinleent and Cultural'Uses ,r Larid Use CC RRC MR . LI Ar!,'ades p O 1 Cultural/Artist Exhibits: a) Indoor gallery and art sales X' b) Outdoor art exhibits O Discotheques- q q Theaters: a) Dinner theatre O q b) Movie (multi-plea) O O �4 EXHIBIT A-13 Office and Administrative Uses is nd Use' CC ✓RRC MR LI** 0 Administrative, Business, and Professional Office X " X* x Banks, Finance Services and: Institutians (with drive-thru) 0 0 0 (Without drive-tnru) X X x Business and Office Services X x a Interior Decorating Shops X ',r' x Medical/Dental Offices and Related Health Clinics X * x Optician and O�T.,,aetricai Shops X X. x o Realtors and Real Estate Offices X X* l x Travel Agencies X X* x Residential Uses Land Use CC' RRC MR LI** 0 } Single Family Detached X Single Family Attached (duplex, ,)Single triplex, fourplex) X ti Multi-famlly Dwellings X 9) Anciila" Residences: I.f a)w me-care facilities (6 or less) JC b) On-site private recreation facilities X Z) Accessory 'Uses: a) Accessory structures 'X } b) Home occupation rf X - SUE-AREA DESIGN.-STANDARDS AND LAND USE kGULATiON i; SUBAREAFF EXHIBIT A.14 4 ki.fei Uses Land Use CC _RRC AR nLl** 9 Hotel/Mote! X: - o` Hotel Facilities (majorl: X Ancillary Uses o Beauty/Barber Shop X C fi o Cafes X o Catering Services 0 0 Cocktail Lounge c. 0 ` o ConferencelConventlon V Facilities 0 o 'Florist Shops 6x o Gift Shops o Newspaper/Magazine Stores! X { o Pharmacies X o Restaurants (sit dmt�i, X o Tourist information! X o 1Travel Agencies t * Commercial/Office uses may be Located.in the i2RC district only with the concurrent development of one (1) major regionaily'related anchor business of at least 15,000 sq ft. per site or project. This provision is intended to facillWe the developmenift of large regionally related,uses. Regionally related commercial 1�" are typified b farge scale businesses which serve a market area significantly larger than those- J�'uslresses which draw customers.prlmari!Y from tine neighborhood or community i�level. * All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Sub-area 7 of r the industrial Area Specific Plan�(ISP). i 9.9.3.3 Setbacks it ct v ty renter Yard ` Building Parking y; 1st Fir. 2nd. Fir. Street Yard (measure from face of the ultimate curb): o Foothill Boulevard 25, 50' 45' o Etiwancda.Avenue 25' S0° 351 o Rochester Avenue 251 45,, 451 Rear Property Line- 0 Adjacent to Existing or,Plannied � Residential Deve)opment 25.' o Adjacent to Existing'or Planned Commercial Development 4° 5' ,� Interior Side Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development o Adjacent to Existing or Planned , Commercial Deveio"j�ment 5.A 51 �r RESOLUTION,NO- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING,COMSIISSION OF THE CmOF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING: APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 91-01, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE;DEVELOPMENT' DISTRICTS MAP FROM "OP" (OFFICR PROFE39IONAL) TO "FBSP" FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN) FOR A t 8.3 ACRE. PARCEL LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST. COdN.ER OF"FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-152--18 AND 30. A. Recitals.! (i)C. Thy fCitY of Rancho 'Cucamonga has iui.tiated an applicatior._� for p Development D� :LiAFt Amendment NO- 91-01 as dee^'.rlbed in the title of this Resolution. �� -fnafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is r���k1rred to as "the application:u, (ii) On April 24 and Duna 12, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings and continued the public hearings to allow for revisions to the application. (iii) On July 10, 1991, the Planning Commissicn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a dt.ly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing an that date. ri (iv) All legal prerequisiten prior to the adoption of thi:i"Resolution have occurrsd. l' B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFCAE, it is hereby, found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commisslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth :in the Recitals azt A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based -upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on April 24, June 12, and July; -10, 1991, including writtenn and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a), The amendment pertains to a t 8.3 acre parcel of land which is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Roghester Avenue' with a street frontage of t900 feet along.Foothill Boulevard and t4gP fact along Rochester Avenue and is prasently vacant. Said parcel is currently designated as "OP" (Office Professional'); and " i i C'_ Sk JV " PLANNING COMMIOSION RESOLUTION NO.' DDA 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 10, 1991 Page 2 (b) The pscperty to the north is designated for residential uses and is developed wit2i single family homes. The property-to, the west is designated for office and commercial uses and is vacant. The property to the south is designated for indust#al uses and is developed with-a single family residence. The property,�to the east is designate for utility and flood control facilities and j 1developed with such; and (c) This am` »dment does not eAnfl.i,ct'with a hand Use Policies of the General Plan and \11 provide for development wi},n the district in a manner consistent with the)e-neral Plan and with re�ed_development; and (d) This amendment will promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) Th amendment would not be il materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties And'wou�d not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properjaies. 3. Based d�vn the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; ,-and— (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impagts on the envircrment nor the surrounding properties; and (c) That the propo:ed amendment is in conformance with tll,„ GenerkL-Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Enviro,:mental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. U S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves"that purr',.,int to Section 65B5Q to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the kinning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Development District. Amendment No. 91-01. " 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLIMIOR NO. \�(f DDA 91-01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 10, 1991 Page 3 1� APPROVED AND;ADOPTED T }S JOTS DAY OF TULT,1991. f, PUNNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONvA BY: l Larry T. McNel ATTEST- Brad Buller, Secretary r1; I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho CucaLgnga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was=• duly and reguiarly introduced, passed, and adopted`bp the Planning Commission of 'the- City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held, on the loth day of July 1991, by the Following vote-to-wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERSa I, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: l4,: JI } f ,4 JI_ Ll r ' RESOLUTION NO. i A RESOLUTION OF THE' PLANNING COG;MISSION',OF THE CITY OF , RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91-01, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ,SPECIFIC PLAN TO INCLUDE THE t 8.3 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST j CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE WITHIN SUBAREA 4 AND ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR DEVELQPMENT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-152-18 AND ' 30. U A. Recitals. M The City of Rancho Cucamonga has initiated an application for t Foothill Boulevard Specific ?lan Amendment No. 91-01 as described in the title �r of this Resolution. Here inafte-, is this Resolution, the subject ?Foothll��— Boulevard Specific:Plan Amen is is referred to as "the applicati01) (ii) on April 24 and June the Planning Commission of the City or Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hear►ngs and continue`(the� public hearings to'allow for revisions to the application. (ii) On July-:u 1 97,� the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing an that date. ,Z (iv) Al'i legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE,' it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This commission_hereby specifically finds that all of the fact iset "forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during ! the above-referenced public hearings on April_24, June 12, and July 10, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The amendment pertains to a t 8.3 acre parcel of�'1 n6_sihich is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard ar z�zizochester Avenue with a street frontage of 1900 feet along Foothill Eonlevard and *400 feet along Rochester Avenue and is presently vacant. -Said parcel is currently ,l designated as "OP" (Office Professional)? and" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ~� FBSPA 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 10, 1991 Page 2 (b) _The property to the north is designated for residential uses and is developed with single family hones. The property to the west ,is designated for office and commercial uses and 3.3 vacant. The property to the south is designated, for industrial uses fnd,-is developed`with a single family residence. = The property to the east is designated for utility add flood control facilities and is developed with- such; and (c) This amendment will in^.orporate the * 8.3 acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Foothill. Boulevard and Rochester Avenue into Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Sp6'i fi,c Plan as at, Activity Centers and (d) This amendment will maintain the sate uses that are curiZ,)atly permitted or conditionally permitted under the "C_._' designation of the Development Codes and (e) This amP54ment will "tie" together the visual aspects of Foothill Boulevard as a icJor commercial corridor through the implementation. of streetscape and site design standards contained within the Foothill ^'.Inlevard Specific Plan. 3.✓ Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commissf',,_ during the above-referenced publics herrings and upon the specific findings of \\ .facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: Aa) That the amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban coma nity within the district that is superior to the development otherwise allowable under alternate regulationsp and (b) That the amendment will provide for development within the district in a manne , consistont with, the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City; and (c) That the amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of,transportation facilities, public utilities, and , public services required by development within the district. 4. This Commission 'hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered An compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, furth0r, this Commission hereby recommends issuance- of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and. conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: (a) The Planning Commission hereby 2ecommends that the City Council approve and adort Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-0f `.2}s attached in Exhibit "k« Ask PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA July 10, 1991 : Page 3 (b) That a Certif�f%d Copy- of this Resolution and related"material hereby adopted by the Plannilig Commission shall be- i,];waxded to the City Council. 6. The Secretary to" this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 4, r z APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10.TH DAY OF JULY 1991. '. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THECITY OF RANCHO CUCd1ONGA BY: _ Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEt"_I' C� Brad Buller, SecretaryAM (( I, Brad Buller, Secresa.v'`$if the Planning Commission o€ the City of Rancho CnG 4u onga, :do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Was duly ,and ,re 'larly introduced, p4e0 sad, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of-the"Planning Commission held on the 10th'day of July. 1991, by the foliowing vota-to-wit: AYESc, COMMISSIONERS: NODS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: }1 LL ,, ` u 1� lw, 9 -. RESOLUTION NO., A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF,,THE CITY OF . RANCHO CUCAMON EN GA, CALIFORNIA, , RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRY VISTA CO-MUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT NO.'91-01, REQUEST .. TO ESTABLISH CERTAIN STREETSCAPE MID BITE DESIGN STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH�,THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF 'FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE -TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, AIM MAKING'. FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho 'Cucamonga has initiated an application' for Terra Vista Community P3An Amendment No. 91-01 as described in the title at this 'Resolution. Herainafter in his solution, the subject Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."' (ii) On April 24 and June 12, 1991,`the Planning Commission of the City -'of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings and continued: the `public hearings to allow for revisions to the application,. (iii) On July, 10, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonija conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to' t`e adoption nf this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THERERORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of.the City of'Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon ' substantial evidence presehtsit to this.,Commission during the above-referenced public hearings ion 'April -24, dune 12, and July 10, 1991, including written aad'oral staff reports, together with,=blic testimor , this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The amendment pertains to property fronting on Foothill' Boulevard within the Terra Vista Planned Community; and (b)` The amendment will "tie" , together the visual aspects of Foothill Boulevard as a major commercial corridor through.the implementation, of streetscape and sfte decsign standar@s._conslstent with the Foothill' 1oulevard Specific Plan areas located-to tide east and west of, the Terca,Vista Ask inje ommunity and i n , P PLANNING.COMMISSION RES47LUTIOW NO. TVCPA 91=01 CITY OF RANCRJ CUCAMONGA July,`10, 1991 Page 2 " �t (c) The amp=:.;dent wsll m. i ntain=the same uses that are-: currently permitted or conditionally permitted under the provisions''of the Terra Vista Community Plan. r� 3. Based upon the substantiai -evidence presented,to this Commission during the :above-referencee;public hearings and�upon the specific findings.. of w facts set forth in;paragraphs T and 2 above; this Cnramissio hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the'district that is superior to the development otherwise allowable��inder alternate regulations; and (b) That 'the amendment wil provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with:�the General Plan and with related development and growth,mt,,nacement policies of the City; and (c) That the amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation 'facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development within the district. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project''hai�-beon,reviewer), and considered in compliance G=th the California Envi.icame-►tal�Quality Act: of 1970, and, further, this Commission,hereby recommends isswmce, of a Negative Declaration. „ S. Based upon the findings„and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and,4 above, this Commission hereby resolved: a (a) Tha ;.pursuant ,to section 65850 to -65655 .of th,- ,California Government Code, thae the Planning Coamission''of the City,of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment,No. 91-01. (b) The Planning Commission k7,reby recommends thatr the City Council approve and adopt Terra vista Community Plan Amendment No,. 91-01, as shown.. in Exhibit "A" oi-the staff report. - (c) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material. hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be fcrwazded to the City �'. ",council. 6. The Secretary'to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TVCPA 91-01 CITY (OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 10, 1591 Page 3 :t APPROVED AND AD017ED THIS 1OTE DAY OF JULY 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OP RAJACHO CUCAMONGA J T, t' BY: Larry T._XaN el, Chairman ATTEST: Cr Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary, o` the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify' what the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed; and adopted by the Planning Commission of r use City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting roof the Planning Commission 'field on the 10th-day of July 199 i+, by the following vote-to-wit: + AYES:: COMMZSSIGNfSRS:: NOES: COMMISSIOL7ERSc e, d ABSENT: COMMISS=EFf6": c� cr t! r t�i {'f�✓+1 ` \jam. "'�i 1 �� _ x; C: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTI017 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, -CALIFORNIA, RECOMM—NDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA;COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT NO.-91-a1, A REQUEST;TO ESTABLISH CERTAIN STRMSCAPE AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOOTHILL, BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN FOP, THAT, PORTION OF FOOTHILL'BOULEVARD WITHIN ,THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, AND WAKING. FIND?r'GSi IN SUPPORT THEREOF. ,. A. Recitals. r M The City of Rancho Cucamonga has 'initiated an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 91-01 as described in the title ofthis Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,'-'the subject Community Plan Amendment is refc---rred to as "the application." r� '%%,,April 29 and June 12 199L, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Conducted duly' noticed pub4c hearings and continued the public hearings to allow for revisions to the application. (ili) on July 10" 1991, the Planning Commission _of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) All 'legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. i NOW, THER=FORE, it is hereby ,£quad, determine8y and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City o£ Rancho Cucamonga as,x__Ilows: 1.. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part, A, of this.Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the alwve-referenced pt:blic hearings on April 24, June 12, and July 10, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with;public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds asfollows: (a) The amerament pertains to property fronting on Foothill Boulevard within the Victoria Planned Community;, and z, (b) The amea`dmeit will "tie" together the visual aspects of Foothill 'Boulevard as a mi jor commercial corridor through the implementation of streetscape and site "s'design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan areas located to the east and west of the Victoria Community Planned Community; and ` X YI �, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. VCPA 91-01 -'CITY Or RANCHO`CUCAMONGA duly 10, 1991 Page 2 (c) T1.e amendment will maintain the ame uses that are surrentiv�i ` permitted or conditionally permitte4 under `the provisions of thetrsla / Community Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial cavidence prliented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of 'facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and . concludes as followse (a) That the amendment will provide for development of a 1 comprehensively planned urban commi+nity within the district•,`that is superior to the development otherwise allowabletunder altprnate regulahonsi and th (b) That e amendment will :provide for developmenY,:`within the district, in a mariner consistent with-' the General Plan and with related" development and groi.th management policies of the atv;fan` u (c)_ That they 'amendment will provide-_/for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation,facilities, public utilities, and public services required by, development within the district. 4.1'tt' This Commission hereby fr'nds that the project has beKtireviewed and consid4Yed in compliance with.t4.a-California Environmental Qualiiy Act of 1970 and, ,fi� �tex, this Commiss]j:: _nereby recommends issuance of a Negative beclaration.' 5. Based upon the fi,nd:Uags and conclusions set„forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Comission hereby resolves: (a) That pursuant to Section 65850 tc* 65855 op the California Governme:it Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuaamoiiga hereby recommends approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 91-01. ';•t fst(b) The Planning Co=issica hereby Crecommends that the City `Victoria Community 21aniAmendment No. 91-01, as Council approve and adopt shown in Exhibit "A." of the staff report. t. ..A cc) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by. the Planning Commission shalll`Le forwarded to the City" Council. €. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the4 ad!)ption of this Resolution. ` PLANNING MG M%SSION RESOLUTION NO VCPA 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO, CUCAMONGA ' -July 10 ;1991 Page 3 C� h' y APPROVED AND ADOPTEU'TFiIS 10TH DAY OF /ILY 1991. P,LAW ING COMMISSION OF'THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: - �\ Larry T. McNiel,-Chairman 7 ATTEST:.. 'Brad Bullu, Secretary C� Brad Buller, Secretary of the'Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuaamongay do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and"adopted, by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a`regular meeting of,the Planning C.omni.ssion held s on the loth Say of;July 1991, by the follows,:a vote-to-wit: AYES: CO�OISSIONERS: (. NOES: COMMI SSIONERS: ABSENT: C.OMUSSIONERS: n , J ry I p RESOLUTION NO. A 'RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL 'SPECIFIGij,PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91-04, A REQUEST , ' p TO ESTABLISH CE{,PAIN STREETSCAPE AND SITE DESIGN ) STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THAT PORTIO_N, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA __x!i cIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS 1N SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga- has initiated an ',application for Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-04 as describar�in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the Su]ject Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (i ) On April 24 an4TJune 12� 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamon ga a,corducted. duly :noticed, public hearings and continued the public hearings to allow for revisions to the application. ' (iii) On July-10, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the ,application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) All legal prerequisites prio1v to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it i.i hereby fo=nn, determined, and resolved by they Plannirig.Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: i. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all'of the,facts set- forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this'Resolution,are true and correct. 1 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on April. 24,` Tuns 12, and July 10, 1991, Including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows i (a) The amendment pertains to property fronting on Foothill Boulevarl within the Industrial Area. Specific Plan; and (b) The amendment will "tie" together the visual aspects of Foothill Boulevard as a major commercial corridor through the implementation of streetscape and site >design " standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan areas located to:the east and west of.the Industrial Area Specific Plany and_ I 6 " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION/ ISPA 91-04"'- CITY OF PMCHQ_CUCAMONGA July 10, 1991 Page 2 (c) The amendment will maintain the same ' issues that are currently permitted or conditionally permitted under the provisions of tae' ?� Industrial Area Specific Plan, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented,' to this Commission C� during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of, facts set forth paragraphs 1 and,2 above, this Commisnon hereby finds and \\ concludes as follows: ' 0 1 (a) That the amendment will provide for development of a S comprehensively planned urban community within the district that is superior " to the development otherwise allowable under alternate reg.'lations; and }. (h) That the amendment will' provide for -development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and withh______3,ated development and"growth management policies of the City; and (c) That the amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or=extension of transportation facilities,; public utilities, and public services requiree,,by development within the distric.. 4. This Commissic"'hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in complir.^ with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. and, further, thi!"'' ommission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.' ( 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions, set forth in paragraphs 1, 2; 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves: (a) That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning';Commission of. the '€y of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends"approval'of Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No.'91-04.' :(b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends tr_-it the City ` Council approve and adopt Industrial Specific.,Plan Amendment No. 91-11,4, 'as shown in Exhibit "A" of the staff report. ti (c) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by; the Planning Commission shall be 'forwarded to the City Council. -6. The Secretary to this, Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. T� 1 c PLANNING COMMISSION RESOL=-9N NO 4� IciPA 91-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 10, 1997 Page APPROVED AND ADOPTEII,THIS LOTH DAY OF JULY 1991 U PLANNING COMS4ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO cucAMONeA BY Lary T. McNiel, Chairman at ATTrST: Brad Bull=, Secretary -� Y, Brad Buller, Secretary, of' the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that tha,,foregoing Resolution was duly and C ,7 regularly' int=duced, passed, and adopted;'by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of July 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COM.MISSIONSRS: v ABSENT: COMK19SIONERS: c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT \ 9ATZ: July 10, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Sanner 7 BY: Scott Murphy, Associ }e Pla er SUBJECT: ENVIRONMF+NTAL ASS".SSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACE 15172 - JERRY COCHRAN - The development of a'20-unit condominium complex —� I on 1.08 acres of land, in the Medium-High Reti+-dential Dist'' t (14-24 dwelling units per, acre), locateeat the tc' .inus of Sierra Madre Avenue ;;;and Main Street - T;N; 207-251722. r I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the Subdivision Map" and Issuance of a Negative Declaration.- Amb B. Project Density& 18.52 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: j North - Single family residentials Medium-HC:gh Residential L (14-24 dwelling unite.per acre) South Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad and vacant; Medium-High Residential s(14-24 dwelling un:141 per acre) East - Single family residential; how Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Multi-family developments Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations:' Project Site - Medium-Hio Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) North - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), South - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per Il acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units` per acre) - ITEM T, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 1j k l TT 15172 - JERRY CUC$RAN July 10, 1991 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics Tke site is presently vacanttAwith an average slope of 2 percent from northwest to southeast.. 'There is an, existing 10-foot wide water easement along the east proje_,t boundary and 15-foot wide "wer easement along the south project boundary. In addition, a 15=fo'8t storm drain easement is being required along the south boundary fad a future master plan storm drain pipe. i F. Parking Calculations: d Number of = Number of Type Spaces Spaces. of,`7se Ratio,. Required Provided 20 2-bedroom units 1.8 spas 36 36 per unit (i covere3..... unit) (20) (20) Visitor 0.25 spas 5 5 per'unit r Total`' 41 41 II. ANALYSIS A. General: On June 2, 1988, the Planning Commission approved Development Review' 88-03 for the development of a 20-unit apartment project. The approval established, subject to certain. conditions, the Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape•Plan, and Building Elevations fo;)the project. Additionally, a one- year time extension wao approved by the Planning Commission on August 8, 1990, subject'to the applicant agreeing to establish or participate in a Mello-Roos Community Facilities D."Istrict { for school facilities. Since that time, the applicant has been pursuing the working drawings for the street improvement and building design and is close to pulling building permits. During preparation of the working drawings, the applicant decided to pursue a "for sale product" as opposed to a rental project. As a result the applicant has filed a Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes on the project. Staff has reviewed the proposed request and determined that the`;• previously approved project is in ''compliance with thk applicable provisions of the Development Code. B. Environmental .Assessment: A'.Negative Declaration was iisued by the Planning Commission and approved Development Review 88-03. In completi h;, the Environmental Checklist, n PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 15172 JERRY COCHRAN .` July 10, 1991 ;. Page 3 staff has determin i,� that there will be no additional impacts created by the approval of the Tentative Tract' Map and, therefore, issuance of a Negative Declaration for the, S\ Tentative Tract Map would becappropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public health at -safety or cause nuisances of significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and Site Plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin,newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were seht to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION:; Staff recommends' that ,the Planning Commission approve Tt�ntative Tract 15172 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions and issue a Negative Declaration. " Respe ECi�l.y ' t d, Bra tall } City Planner BB:SM•mlg Attechmsn : Exhibit. "A" Site:IItilization Mao Exhibit "B" Tentative,;Tract Map t,, Exhibit "C" Site Plan Exhibit "D" Conceptual handscape.Plan -' E.:chibit "E" Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F'* - Buiiding Elevations Resolution No. 88-117 (approving Development Review 88-03) Resolution o£,Approval with Conditions f '1„t t {/ ------------------ NINTH ' STREET t rER-i w ^HAPt:EE 'STREET 2d � F MAIN STRE T ;1 PROJECT SITE Y -� CITT' 2 cx0 CUcaMf%Nl- b j "EIGHTH t o" STRE • - a > w r � a f"�1 Q j, LLi 4J J t 1 W �1 '1 _ F:7 �..�-� ' " ITEM':� r3r72 _ J 0, UCAMONGA E CITY OFI . : TM E s �rrr rratr 1Y PLE�NL�7TN+�D�SIt3N ExHmrr.A St ALE: ;i r Y, W 74 j tt I STREET �' •_ �+ . "r'1 f Wit' �"� � l ot F 1 w L.._ _.�a... - OtlOYIItlY '3 'S i '1 'tl, OF RAffCH,t".-UCAMUNGA PLANNING DNITISION} I' TITLE EXHIBIT: 7ALIE: 11 va, i Y I Ir _•__ i Ada } i ' a i y ITEM. jl'-✓S/�Z r1 CIS O�F, UCAMON A TTfX.Ea rIm'`-� Eli ff. a SCALE: 4 ,_ u ( U It 4:-f'S) M ...- Ali���i l'1 11 �• �„�c .:�\ ._:..,?_ L 5- - OF _� LTa:AMONGA TYEm:, ✓s/7� PUt.N Il If?nl 'ar�7.�• "i N '' EXHIBM 0 SCALE: ttl rnNSTRt'Cf10N M7TES 1 >, kl d QQ�e.vlar,rr u w e Rre � I C ('8 4 �() !)rrrlM✓N r fr+!(I.n»4e rr m+Ies't.wrrrtw. t ♦t� fb t rM I '�. .4 ZY1 7 1'1` �•��\ �� i- �i. b, �is „J h i4Lk� Ste, ,'j� � (\ a.w .. f "f yryi,p .may •, IF CIITY OF t'.d (-C CANdv?NGt� TI C E PINING- I WISION _ l EXH-l.;ifT a SCALE: - c 0 o " e L Sm . m 17 7JTl®Mi s `lifs6Y v p i 1 Ta o J M t �� ; -1 t.' 20 EJL1 02 r � � N j-rt v -C } t U� IL El ! Ell 3 El' lD j J t� !L G�' ; (`1771 So, iAL j L 4 RESOLUTIGN NO. 88-117 rti A RESOLUTION__OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING�COMMISSION,,._. o � APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, NO., 88-03, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 20 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT,'ON 1.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH RES,ILENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE TERMINUSES OF SIERRA,MADRE AVENUE AND MAIN STREET -) APN: 207-251-22 C _ A. Recitals. i Al -�( has) file d n d 5 a 1 ca�.i on for t e approval PP h pp oval of Developrz,it Rev�ew:_No. 88-03 as,-' A2scribed in-'the'-title of this Resolution. Herei4at er in this Resolution, the -abject -Development Review request is referred to as "the application". l �s (ii) On the 22nd- of.June, 1988., the Nannirg 64knmission of the,.City of Rancho Cucamonga conducte0a meeting,on the ication, and corclude d said meeting on that date. (iai) . A11 legal prerequisites to the adoiAion of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. Am ,7 M041, THEREFORE, it is hereb,} found, determined and resolved by the TW Planning Commission of the Cityrof Rancho Cucamonga as follows: r, 1. This C �� l� ommi�sion hereby specifica;l ly finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals-` Part A, of this Resolution are true and :orrect. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during"the above-referenced meeting on June 22 , 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as fallows: Wa ''tr The applic�k.tion applies to property `located at the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north, east, and west is designated hor residential uses. The property to the north and ea at is developed with single,; family residences. The prnpeAy to the west is developed with a condominium project.. The property.to the"south is designated and developed with railroad tracks,operated by A.T.4 S.F.; and (cy The project, with the recommended conditions of"approval 11 , complies with a11, minirmm development' standards of the City, ,of Rancho Cucamonga; )and ..;, (d) The development of 20 apartments on 1.08 acres of land—is consistent with the Medium-High Residential land use designation of 'the Development Code�and the General Plan. , PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT`'REVIEW 88-03 - ALAN SMITH June 22, 1988 1 Page 2 \ �G 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presenter to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the,specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph;, ) and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a), That the proposed project is'zonsistent, witty the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the ; objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed 'use is in compliance' with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) -,That :the proposed use, together with,, t�h conditions applicable thereto, will not, b' dLcrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materiallyinjurious to properties , or ili' merits in., prove the vic pity. o d. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Comission hereby issues,,;a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and cone)usi rts set, forth 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application nsubject ato;) each and every condition set forth below ,and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. ~" Planning Division r (1), A spa/Jacuzzi shall be. provided. The Tocatlon, size, .and design <shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. (2) The roof '°e_ye > on the rear et.evation of the garage shal%, , alarged to be more in scale with `,he building: vr7shall bO°eliminated, The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of'-building permits _� (3) ;The following items shall be incorporated into the 'final landscape p1ths which are subject to review and approval by the Citi• Planner prior to the issuance of-building permits: 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT 'REVIEW 88-03' - ALAN SMITH June 22, 1988 Page r'� G (a) ,'Accent treatment shall be.; provided at ,the entry off Sierra Madre Avenue. S (t)- Extensive landscaping shall be provided along the site boundaries, particularly the north and east boundaries.. (c) A sample of the -texturized pavement material shall be s_,!��nitted.` err' (d) A decorative block wall shall be 'provided along the south property lines. A wrought iron fence with decorative block pa asters or a . decorative block wall ,,,shall be required along the north property line. In. addition, the existing walls on the east and west shalt be upgraded t?� provide a decorative treatment, such as ltucco with a decorative r-ap ; (e) The limits of any easements and their restrictions on ,.��3nd ;ping shall be �U1 clearly delineated oa the pl'ans. (4) ' A final acoustical. analysis shall' be provided/to address potential noise impicts f�om the A.T. & S.F. Railroad and any necessa°'__-'mitigai;ion for ex%erior and interior noise levels. The analysis shall be reviewed and accepted by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. Engineering Division (1) The developer shall obtain the necessary right oT - way and construct full width improvements for Sierra, Madre Avenue from the project site nort(srly to the existing dedicated portion of Sierra Madre Avenue o prior to issuance of building permits. Sidewalks shall be constructed along the west side and 'shall cover the entire parkway from the hlock wall to the curb. The developer-is eligible for reimbursement ' for the - cost of construction of the off-site improvements upon development or redevelopment of J the 'adjacent property._. The amount of the reimbursement Will be prorated on"a net acreage basis (minus street dedication) for the benefited' properties. AWL F�CANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. -` DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-03 - ALAN SMITH '}I June 22, 1988 Page 4 Affik ,J (2) Storm drain facilities shall be constructed and an easement provided to)convey flours from Sierra Madre Avenue through *he site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (3) A 15 foot easement fgr the future master plar?eed storm drain shall be dedicated along the . outh' property 'line of the site-to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (�4) T,�e storm. drain easements shall\ be iccE�:.sibl+e b}� Ci`�Y vehicles. Landscaping �rith:n the ezriaments \!m. shaa,l be subject to the approval of tti, City Engineer. .f (E') An easement. over the internal drive aisles shall be provide) to the City to ensure access for City C6, ntenance vehicles to the City storm drain easements. � -, (6) An .-1 ieu t. as contribution to the future undergrounding ..ur- the existing oYerhead utilities (railroad communicatign lines) w1bin the A.T. 5 S.F. Railroad •+asement shall be paid tv=fthe City prior- to the ftssuance iof building permits. The fee shall be half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the projectsite. (7) Main Street aCutting the east property line shall be completed with a modified turn around (18 foot radius) to tie satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6'. The Deputy Secretary to this Commissi:an shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED 1741-5 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNING C ISSIDN Or 'iHE f,IIY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c BY: �. arry � rman ATTEST: ra epu y ecre ary r PLANNING, COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-03 - ALAN,,SMITH 0 June 22, 1988 Page 5 ... I, Brad Buller, Duty Secretary/'of the Planning Commission o,f the City of Rancho CucamOnga, fa hereby cert �� that the foregoing Resoh'tion was duly and regularly introduced, passed, an"opted by the Planing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mseting of the,1' rning Commission held on the 22»d day of June, I08, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONEgSt TOLSTOY EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, 11TIEA, MCNIEL o NOES: Comm ISSlO!.5i a�: HONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 0l J � Awk o 4\ =SOLUTION NO r J A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OFTHE CITY CF L RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVr.TRACT " MAP NO. 15172 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A i0-UNIT CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX ON 1.48 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14`-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED'AT THE i"ERMINUS OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE AND .MAIN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN''SUPPORT Ti)EREOF - APN: +rf7-251-22. s- A. Recitals. Jerry N. Cochran has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 151.72 as'dazcribed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the xubject Tentative Tract, Map request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 10th`'of July 1991, thb�Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted- a duly notice jkb. c 'Nearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. —>% (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution h,�7e occurvad. cv- B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, d&ujrmined,'and resolved by the i1 Planniag Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: .- 1. This Commission hereby,specifically finds that all of'' the-facts - set forth in,the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. I' Based upon substantial evidence ;presented to this Commussi r,� � during the abLwe-referenced public;hearing on July 10, 1991, including written` and oral staff',reports, together wkv:h public testimony, ,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the terminus sierra Madre Avenue and ilain Street and`az,IRSescntly vacant, and (b) The property, to the north,,.east,p y , .east, and west is_designated foi'� t, residential"uses. The property to the north and east is developed w_th. singl, family residences. The property to t.�e west,is developed with a condominiVA project. The property to the south is designated for railroad purposes and v r residential uses and developed with railroad tra�'jcs' operated by Atchison Topeka,And Santa, Fe Railroad and is vacant- and E�) (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development stardards of_the City of Rancho s•e =�ngaF and ..i , 0 PLANNING'COMMI=SION RESOLUTION�,44• TT 15M - JERRY N. CoCNRAN -y ? July 10, 1941 Page 2 £ (d) Tae°development_of 20 aparhments on 1.0'.Iacres .of sand is ' consistent with the Medium-High Residential land use designation, of the 6evelopment Code and the General_Plam: 3. Based upon the substantial ev,depk a presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing'and'upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs )--,tna 2 above, Uhij.-Commi3sion hereby finds and concludes as follows;,. = v (a) That tentative tract is consistent with =he Genera:. Plan, ' Development Code, and-specific plans; and (b) The design or' improvements of the tentative tract are consistent with thelGeneral Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is ph21�\Ih. sically suitable for the type of development proposed;�dnd (d)~ -The desfi fin , x ubdivis3 etl is not likely to cause substantial environmental aage,-an9 avoidable injury to humans and wildlife oz their habitat and< `� 60 Tfe tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and iT (f) The design of the tentative tr8 �' in not conflict with C any easemen�;' acquired by the public at larr—d''Tnow of rec6,rd, for access through or use of ..he pro x* within the proposii subu y f��ix.. 4. This i tmmiss''sne hereby finds.and o. 3fiei that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with S.x:. California Environmental Quality. Act or 1970 and, further, this Commission;,hereby issues a Z:egative Declar.23on. S. Pased upon the findings and conclus a set forth in para3raphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Comaidsion hereby approves the application subject to each and every co'-adition set forth. bslow and in the attPch;:d Standard Conditions attac-h(,d hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Divi'4'Lon --,77 - 1) Al_T•., app.:icable 'conditions Oontained in o Resolut_ton Nos. Se-117 and 90-106 shall apply. 2) Apprrioal' she=.._ expire. unless exteraed.by the Plnnin CommiSsion,A- "� g if building pei�aits .arz not isrsuad or apprave'd use has.not cGUmenced Y within 24-months from the da'Qe of,.approval. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.,, TT 15172: - JERRY N. COCHRAN ~ w July 10, 19911 Page � Fngineerin4.Division. ;r 1) .onstruct full Width inprovemen s 'i ,r .Sierra) Madre Avenue from the project site nor?�ttely to the existing indicated portion of 4iai!a,,Ma4re. Avenue. She deveTj,•,er is eligible -£or reimbursement for the`'cost of construction-'of the off-site improvemeirts ;uppn delelopment or redevelopment of ttY-,-j adjacent 4roperty. The 1 _ amount of the reimbursement will be prorated on r a net acreaga basis (min 's,-street edicati�in) for th<�-benefited properties. 2) Landscaping to ,cover the enrire parkLrny area along the west side of Sierra Maar2 ;venue from the clock well ,to the cu+=la shah beJprov:ded.6 The "landscao g shall be' maintained by; the.' Condomini,um�rwners`� Association. " 3) Storm drain-facilities-,shalt be cCnstructcd and an,, easement proeided to convey flows from s4urra MwEa i� Aven= through the 'sure to the ' satisfaction of trie City Eaginecr. ,'' 4) A 15-foot easement for the future master,r planned storam_.drain shall be dedicated along, the south property line -of -_lie- site t* the satisfaction of the City Ensineex. i} The storms drain easements shall ,be accessible-" by.,City vehicles. Landscaping within the easements shall be subject to the;approval of the Cit Engineer. 6) An, easement ovzr the ,nte7;na1 0.=ive aisles shall -be provided to,the City to insure access, for City maintenance vehicles to the City=storm' drain easements. 'r (i 7) An in,-lieg fee as contribution to " .e future undergrounc of '-the existing overhe?sd utilities (railroad communication l �es)R-- within the r-Atchison Topeka-,-,,'and Santa Fe k.a!�roae. ea ementr snall"be paid ,to the City pri�.-� to ti issuance of building per=its. The< 4,: fee shall be'haff the. City acbf,�ed unit.+amount- times the length of the project site. , , �1 X PLANNING COMhTSSION RESOLI}TION NO, TT 15172 - TERRY I COCHRAN ' v July 10, 1991 Page 4 l _ \ Q L 8) Main Street abutting the east <,,p operty line ,rf shall he completed with: a moditied turn around 18-foot- radius) to the,, satisfaction of-the � City Engineer. - { 6 'i'e Secretary_ to this Commission sFall cetify t_q the adoption ':of this Resolu;"ton.. APPROVER AN11::.kDOPTEa THIS 40TH DAY r,1F JBZY.199f, } PLANd7NG CflE"_i:{:SION. OF. MM C7fiY OF`RANCHO OiCAMONGA y Larry-T bcN3,ak; Chairman f - ATTEST: w, Brad Ettller, Secretary T_, Brad. Buller, Secretary of the Z-la,aning CazrmiseYcn of the City of Rancho l� Cucamonga, do hereby certify that is a for.�'a%�t, i�eaalution;" vas iiuly and f r ' regulaily,introduced, passed, and :-idoptei/, �,f%e* Plar^ing Commission of the City of Ranncho Cvcat onga, at a regular, ineec4na G: the Planning C_ormi.ssion h,Zd on'Uhe 10th eE y of July,,1991 -=rsr. h¢ folliswing vote-to-wit AYES: `OMMISnOXERS: ik NOES: COMMISSIONERS: I ABSENT: COIaMISSIONERS: f I 3tlor 4;d I( �i L� Ywt3��eu �Q Sa Owlq~L cepy Uq aYd I� ,.i. p=�GoUC^d> y`Mp of OpgQj�yC. ,■; L des,/� O � �• L�Yp S 4A}1` d.. b.Cv -. ^O-vtld� c �.yL q9q .1 »r3 `•u:c`Seu wcci,y�6 �'�� via^a,, a�.y...F uom:'n�O "1 TT YL q f �8a�G ^15. «y ~O Y.O. a t` S Y ee.Y.6 Y U� pCp 6..: Y■. n p Z. v a .�1:wOi y p•',".� 'r 0 .5.2 G { OSvA =o.GGal`�na Y.. v ,,,,^Y.Y-C a::'_ 3��aw•S Ma yyy sY L-. Gqy qGEWz N C tlf BOL L'`g Y Y6�+�4aa w..20 2 tic*— a es'd as'. 3 M q ti Y i i� w�'Swn YO O.,•y�0 dC C \ ZT O ,N V i �pq M '_ qE�v qLN. �M _.Mb �YY p �•' D6d«tl q y NYb �.-.OYC .wS-tit. O:M. �OE. � q L qY C q V ,`C C q. �' C G• d V 'w va \SIN LCy r' -.y {{w��Y L 'y OL ab•O`O $Y� C- MYd �M�y �Y >by�fpC tlCYY �` 8anc5«�Oa�. l=rdb'aw;t'tva ..C ����i u - cl Zvi •�,$ a'tuad0. -j ' • � O^w �N SY '� ...q. S V p a G . e¢ ryry i`V q L wCw \ am M3 �OY.o�0 1MV-3 IL is x V O J cl a �a 8� axrisw�i« t d 4.~ O.g Y a O M.r O..i L L.�U�4 A Y L � 0..�u 0 L C O; CQ t V 9Yl U Y G O Y �' L r Q O C w�• d .G ✓ O'.Y.yyyyO ` YQ9" V G ks L. c� cs a $L a+•cc 4u •YY a- -1 z�� q w'io �$ v� - Ymm _�ma C1�w p Lam_ ftb q�.. .tic,,, $ aYa �g m�.�0i �`�'® Q »:sey� ,:_ 4$ w�i NS .o Ass ..a 'a mMc=eA.Y. �No .~r �,�7�� ,..�. a•/� vY :;v «, �•c x,,,,G' z `: s cam q_yIIOCN '^OtuCCO�N `s. _OL a 6 a'tl V y O^a-`CO' W L~ 1 W Y N r 9 y r 1 a Q1.i A w 0 4 C ^r^ D H M Y Ym 9 y 6 lI- u Mp N q N C y, N C Cm L L Y T •{V d C�.`.� C M d m � C g C L±�� L w c dae0� .:1,Q'Y'-C'°� oEi {� w�•y..so Yo.;� aN via w Tvy` ]t�«.�eav I .$ gw .^.� gw2�� rY .epS.0 ` �C-ovrj.a 'Y$ A C A II Q C t ,T w Y A a ^ Y G ., wY C pq C Y q O Y�. Y�'• T 4 a V Y vR ii '.�`�: O N L m C M m Y W y L a.V�O® f gL m.. Ola Y.ro O� 'Za ay{.� o..��i �s g a Ym L't#jy F Cb9 �'a:: Tj E'l iggcRS eq Y O V G O PS C �p O j iwl S a�a�� g4 L iyyi Lpy.p iyg�T® L ZOyyZ a LM,, Y P Yq •l+ C. . <aaa 60YYr �RSNNL �NYY �Y iYOeNMVYai I�tlw.�� CLm22YL� Ma AOL C i O V JS d+C ^N w^ yy^tea r.*i.G �"q� p y�af .` M'ap�.4� Oea1.a..R4 y�y yoyu a.p v!®1 !'+O m _� Q �• NNN O C{L� - � 6 i N r�y Y'!®�.. ���.,Lya u p a,'�N QRm `mV y� p N Ypa �.�. A 'i . � )•p 16• 07. a Ops [jo K y*r��C O 60ss Y VV L e4P.s v 8.p9 m0 S, np" s� Rw9.e. r'"+Y Y em N9 b _ D Y 4OIO rl �Ly m r aB+�(W yy b y e xL�s N CCYO M� C�b. yg i�: -m7Y m6 �_i'�JV�1�'.�®a �V, ri�,M sY.q .pM y .r'�.•.9 y ya �4, OB.~t L�'C.V�Y y ~ L" C yy■ wC M^ a m: m�F..ey -D Y by O m L c'V e.Y o Yp 4 d c+• n Y6.m.0 pros. .�y^M. p7�SYa Cb•`� (�yuYp `�~_q .6aSr C® .ugLgp YYty[!L N�VZ ps {N��H. Y�••y��.� �t�•. CN r�L0�0:�0� �u Y'D9 qi' Y�6NyY lmi O 3• NN�. uY MN4b a� O O,C ACC I{ LO a0 g 7y L�MyaY.sY�.... RQ c O.L r r't�S qCY r■ YC 4��.m �Ys. eV Mpp �F^•_A.« �M 8Q.a C�O aN.O 5.4.G46 #..4i� sD�t�Srra - rLr•fOti y04— m 'S.9CO.� Q CmM m9f yQO V.}� YOyy.: of �YYY0 0 y4(iyRUMa�Y aCVP 40i p� {Oi�DL G .�nN LS N'O Win•.M.p N9+�(•'-CYe, H a G4 co..aa. N � qY� Y uu ✓ d y4C Y 4 4 Y 9 C 6TA `.7Yc L C�L.�C N� .Y ,2C.. — ca Q q G O w C � N�.•� M�O..0 �~ Gyd+ ��� C LC a� � 140.�0..✓Y Oi d i =NYY E. —YA— Spp aa 'xyyc v wi IL Ycv $ c ca C7gw LL b.-L �y �r by O.v M.CpwQ ✓_Y O La YL ,tyY^' �1 O ...Y h we♦ ��a �p Y..6 wy p 0 N M�N.tl 9 e•.Q�M�,— C"1�..-.r1—A+ a O O yr.. C '1 yT yt O✓C `(' _t% 11 . u 06e -12 J C.a✓s U L i e �� M C O. Y N Y f I Y ++� 6+sR a 9 .{.L �\ 115 ✓�ydy� NyIyY 1fY V ,+L' CN�a�gl6�Ci0 i]��- OIW NapI Y�i Qy�~ �\' + `�... vLq t•S qC� syyyyVVVVLL+ .a Y OYq.'L q'4.iL G.ey 036 �w�t � Y � �'■ CMfOD NiA O.w wN Vr+CY�a�G 0��. C C"' :�{YTI��S. YOYY4V C oL Cv$s! Ly M.CyLV�Y qQ�'�$ ~SCyV _q 4C Z'y'gY~y~Q/i Ct,.2 !N $NO HNi.-�C ri Ill O.a3.5 mow_ .Le��+ O a_a m r°Ci t1L. �J6 O. YlC,rMY oaa i_y13o �w b C Q;5 .0 Q.b +w� �.. L.�rm� pa s C �pM qM qsy. y 01�0 aN .«qg.O v�Y� � �+� ��. N ♦.'y® �d�� nYwMl 9.L� .r��g'.L da 6dCG>�.lQi� .Lit v0l cO.L NTi �yrQ a ... 4s L« !d qO `.NV)V Y IX qVY yabbi�� F . is pC;�— vCLpO a� ,4.4 Yj$.. 9`�a.p04 VryY Mt�tl yli�e � ..�= wrgqi8�:� N. O` +«p'CV �..C• 11..'.9bV YV«4=✓L O® *y'.w+.. C VYgdi a«L CZ �`'� «yV�gd+ q.� fYp1 O O V E ®CY Y Gs K YC {Nr sli V �� sNY dfs Uv 4 C61ww4 s ���� A+Ci YAf Q GLV Ma. +H �,�gftl7 OIL �e 6gY �OO�C� MbO O5A L CC M✓..0 �C � Qq+ 9T .it•. ✓>� Y�,.O L 7C r!!ate C o C C�q p�wey 7 Gw L ^ r sy O u N d] tT +�Y.•. ;y r. C ♦/I V.+ ryry yaam. ■ qy I G Y V L tC Ow�g0� C+�iNB W PY.,.'�'av1✓s y^w.. �Qs`O �.N4pi Ey.6 �YAy� o V.r oir V y q Y Y�y vv Y:r p. 2 Z. V. 9�03 � \� Ypa 4`4V.E-. y�f V N _ Y &$ CC y E. Cy.r u 4 N C L N Vi.C� Mg ZZ � �y1 O ypi JI es, (` v. x :Oj11 p. �. Y n. a.O. O L"'•`•.` .., t CC /@g yY 4 i.C 4 '�+ Y. s r /N "•c a r p�'''W rJ an. iYtl.fiM�A��`.. uTyy. .Ot gyp, NW•`.+•'a` +��.. Au J}yir'�ii rgJY iyw pa, a '�_ xgL =YV-P gEM ANY s •'2.., J(Y, M d YN Pg4 .W L (a�Y E Y)D L F`+4�Y �`rnJ�oE�JI• 4� YpO YP •°Am $ a�Ye ' a Y . iro 1 ` Y + S M` u �1 'tj u Z it .M . x .. TL M y •S lb + Y pC ` O Cvyy Ym� dup6 YwYir..{Yp� y, ..y'tl G a YP. Yai.S IS L.4 .y` { ^MWa.: �4G �sY ` M Y Ur p Epp p{ j�+i tl 111�¢¢¢ ve 0.•s � +'�O tE� yrtisV�.. 2• a+sS�yO{� .tg�fLfL�il0L�.� 6y•� fy,OaVC L rO::p pN!Irv J N�% ice' 6 �1L d yp aA e .Jc]i3tC� •" g` L4 SN.g `qq�Lgas S. ..SEq �MMv w,aYn� �� -N ate` ®a I&Sit _ :Wei Yw _19 NC:o +rSa + 'g. 0 ® ��' a � 4a ®� flag 6b' Sao o'�a!� pp�t lb C g _ Psi � °ST �.. a+e Y2w— OG�gL v i V .. �Q'A�Vi $ V Ay94t`9 p! ',L�4P y� .�o ^V .7y yyA VVY a _ gsgpL%� '.B r f'+¢cy s yq�-v.0 ,6 a CYgY6 tlO � MO�'Nw•i O�li OaY -�C�)� �0� ��Y A� Br N'W C. L•.OE -,V ! E N 9�Y^ 0w tl a .•.� ^ fd ya`^8'u uYy =w O CO EVw� CLC'. ilL q dQb18� .w O0 �. N40L Q.,v !C !✓6 C. ^ s+a 4N 'A=y LCE V O CS 6Y.t N 9S'J _•Cr' �e le -CES GY Nm `e 2 ti. _ i ZyeV 4 _.q W a e GV NG 292. 9 L'a v Y y Y I VqV �N GL �fj L y= a Yw.0 ' �.py� tly$�y COC1: � gD.OL 4�►o'M I`O' l Y V��P e� 1�.. yy« �oCj ogga�A{ tioi, u o��.o Nyi�.x.9 �V 1 e Q M4 c� � iy 8 of% R �— �N� T. y "`•• N N^kP.N. «o Y«Cp... No �, u unnr� ocp b.60 V OPLV�yG A M; L L Y Y « , w M w ty3N.�.'CIf �V r� ®C S "V6i�w.sL. V �1116 "GO Q� f4Y�r.5 �L.Svw ex.. Ypp �hL p.0 14 y Ln r q0 6 F a` p 04 d JC L O�6 g Y L Y N t 7.. M CC I®9 Yp o v u be wo. 1®5 �lq vs w� LQ Y:V6®el p - Ljai u�i; �C EO irl YOfi �cp� I-.6 rp6~YG Ll— Wy '{w '_m'� N �i`g Wp ISvy}S� 3�,pCC@`�M I .,4a. t .�8 oz eYic� �K�+npyp. tl.sgV. _ c9b LgS e C - CHs +\ \. e� "fir to �4�q 'p == � "' X % � .r��Y �g��2 ay_ y Ma$ LLM� IEA LV tl� 'i/l0 �A�^ 'g4�i ® I 4t W l WAi. pp�.0 ppuv `r• �� n�v� L� Y.g [®.6.. ..l .-p:N s{ Py:IL uw L 1 NLl V +e14=Lwqq' M w p _ gg' .0!: �`'� 19``t ' �27 _ e �_g'4r psi=�o(+'� +y=ad o$.. ,.. be. LS '®® �N,..C4g L.N se C r N C4 p L C a tlo.Y c.L��a!F /r di " i.?.�GS <rJ ,�lNV S.J�Gi Vr � ii:my�H^L 1 Ny W Vti C —04 ( � G � i Er r i� �1 �-• oaor �: Y d ��aQ� d � <N� Ya �YGY WW LL L C L V--LL� n• S9tq Oo. q�� yyyC�lLu O o a w o_ OQSF �N .J �CO� 'b Ld aC e -$ : ' 7 �'•� �C6•�,„-� =Q� yM$ Y =Y C=NCY � �F^ q �1 O' C �^� ayi. a$o gy N c Yc y +� bit -gusi. u q°$ ' ^'+a y CYYy JL 2p CCVNC b �r•r L9 ayY2 C N �. OtYy1� Qpp` . Lw q «C Oeri by to Q CAA 2 SMV ^y 60.� !r Nay} R C V Lca m7 Q+o as �a �9 = 3q g.3 qN q @ t C pN eas3o $ �d't O'Sg�YB ^Y 82$ 'a�o lQ a^ � o't'q ® �` % {{ � +M Y$ LI.4 ®�W G It Y«.OS(LEVY NO O= �� C C vd. pyg_pO y0 Ya a +V OC hiq •JYo�. tl41b C: �O19�« .92 C V L 6 6b �. dbl arS4l JS ��W 3 €C (�(� p +L rr, {«y�Q �j 2!5 c Y « sy`YBlrY Ya Yam. ii^• C 6,.. Qppv.0 `l`M. ' OS�� WV LVY `:J Or 6itMN a6 + C sbCLOcpc 6�V 2 YZ` �� � INN:..Y.W 4i 61 +1 ^ NI %� s �i i o• op MJ� _ eY C > y u� 1.:4 Y _q i1 bgy 4W ivo f me db e� CV« pO: 9 tA' LyY Tip ..>�+M no, «, p ® 'E "g■ C i6W idr:> A G Cg pL VNyb A■A �cO ab p «OOIDID ➢y ypy _M a1i1 v4� ` 41, ' -C.p �^ a�R f EN`• b.. W ".� EVE O 8 YI 4� &oil �N= �..T qmf4y�� 20 0 i L W yY�C KZ C.:�l W.i. L G.� a O'�•� ,YP p 4` y,�q Y r+ C V u f � '_Y` Q.�,Y. M 0 W S 1® �f'.O W. � •• W V I o I r i) as La -� 12, + r. « b,a � I ga O. O�^C!� • AaY C s.. ems^ y Q 0.5 u 0S awl lLe c : u b( Y •'g b tam `t`I- CC yetti-O: 151 �5qq�Lo`w ( rwpq i� ya = o � a $ }p� a a� z;g �p�c. da ��d� �•�+�® a� �° :�� , ���A a-p��sae +".e e.. 4 ny.9 M4 f� yyV V.�^ if � r�it�'•.�N Y�� V9 A0 6 b L Oi ]RQLL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �t -t "DATE: July 10, 1991 r TO: Chairman and Memb,rs of the vianning Commission FROM: Brad T41 er, City Planner 3 "Nancy Fong, Senior Planner l SUBJECT:. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSIiSNT AND DEVELDIPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-02 " CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A request to amend .various development` standards and design'gridelines for multi-family residential districts., Staff recommends issuanc,`, of 3 Negative Declaration. (Contanued from June 12, 1991.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 2TIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 97=02A - CITY' OF 'xtM7C90 'CUCAMONGA, - „A 'regaest to amend various development standards and des.:gn guidelines for ;,. multi-family residential districts Within' the Etiwandr_ Specific Plan area. Staff,,xecommends 'issuance of a Negative Declaration. (Continue$ from .7un't.12, 1991:); bNVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02: - CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA A request to amend''various development standards and,design guidelines for multi-family 'residential districts within the Terra',Vista Planned Community area. -Staff recommends issuance, C*- a Negative Declaration. (Continued from June 12, 4t391./`f 21 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSRSSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMIMaTY' AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM021GA A request to amend various development standards and design guidelines for multi-family residential districts within the Victoria Planned' Community area. Staff recommends issuance of"'a Negative Declaration. (Continued from June 12, 1991.) I. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is for the Planning Commission. to review and consder action on various code changes relating to, multi.-family development. The goal for these code -changes is to ry; enhance the communitl character and the'quality of lifeffor residents \a in multi-family projects. The following actions are requested from the Planning Commission. ' 1 A. Recommend approval of Development, Cfode Amendment 91-02 and V issuance of a. '-Negative Declaration to the City , `Council. B. Recommend approv.i of Terra Vista Planned Communi Amendment 91 02 and the issuance of a'Negative Declaration,;' to th_ City Council. ITEM M-P * PLANNING CO*ISSION STAFF REPORT ' DC.A 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, VPCA_ 91-02, ESPA 91-02 CITY OF RANCHO CUMIONGA - July 10, 1991 Page 2 f C. Recommend approval of victoria Planned Commu'n ty omendmeiit 91-02 and tihe issuance of a negative Declaration z the City Counci��. D. Staff recommends tabling Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 4) -��91-02A (see 'discussion In the AnalysisrsSection of this,;' . _` report). E. .Staff recommends approval cf a resolution. amending Resolution No. 88-161 regarding the''laadscape policy II. BACKGROUND* On February 26, 1991. the :City :ouncil adopted a resolution chargii,g The Commission with the�;responsibility to modify e City's development standards and design guideline.,, to ensure high qaality multi-family projects. TO assist the Com "esicn in this responsibility, staff prepared a SS dy with recoq ��ns 4o changes to various development standerd.c'4and design guidh Ines. The study and the proposal changes were bassi on staff analy�iag the ^ current development standards contained in`�'the Development Code, comparing them to,the Terra Vista Planned Community, the Victoria s. PlannC: Co>?mmu,_,iy, and the Btiaanda Specific Plan, as well as reviewing -them with the past practices zed .policies of than Commission. " The proposed changes .focused on various site development standards ensuring steps for proper transition of density and"$,1' atibiiity of use, upgrading the open space requirements` ar f the related recreational amenities, upg�'ading the archite' u ! renjniremeh3 s, visitoz':parking and other,related project amenities The Commissiox" conducted a' series of workshops to review th( varivns proposed' 1 changes. Representatives froi the property orners `nf the two planned comuunitiev, Mews Homes and William Lyon Company;' as well other developers and design professionals attended,, the wor __and provided input to the Commission ,and staff. Attaches:' fnr your reference is the ssimmary and ;` flan of-' the ,Rlanniag"Commission workshops of April 4, 11, and it sr d.Mry ,8, 1991 (rxbibit '1A '). In- the concluding worY'shop, tha c:.amission Gtirovided speciEio! d�_�c* on'! to staff to prepare tha,"attached Development Code Ameri`cments and ' Planned Community Amendmi:nts as discussed in the Analysis section of this report. 1; III. ANALYSIS: . This section of the report focuses on des uribing, discussing, and analyzing the various proposed changes ' t��the !,f development standards and design guidelines-'?relatjdSr4to'multi-family projects within the citywide area, tha two planted communities area and the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. The format consists of listing r the existing codes, tt , proposed changes or the proposed new codes, ; followed by an rnalysis`of the 'changes. r� i .� PLAIvZ3iaG CO TISSION HrAFF RErJRT DCA 91=02, TVPCA S^-02, VPCA 91-02, ESPA 91-02 CITY OF RANC$O CUCAMONGA t ✓ V J� 3 July 10, 1991 G t Page 3 j{ , 11 a A. &-velopment Code. " 1 ;3evelo�-neiat ztandards.' a. Establish a minimum net •lot area under Basic and Optional Standards: :a ^xi tirig ''No minim;wt net Tot area or acreage ? / � !equ red. Proposedz a.3 acres minimum for Basic Standards an!� 5 1 acyis for Optional Standards., Analysis Requiring a minirt�hm lot area would encourage lot consolidation and thereby,; provide a greater opportunity for a more efficient site design. Under the Basic Standards, lots of legal v record but less than 3 acres would be allowed`to develop at the lowest end (e.g., under 9 dwel'.`'ng units per acre for the'medium'Residential Diz! rict) of the permitted density range. The reasons are two. fold. First, staff recognized that " there , are approximately 70+ lots which are under 3 acres and currently designated as Medium Resic?ential with `no de?relop{hent, proposals.-, This provision would 'allow for c»velopm�pt of theme parcels if the applicant or _ developer%- s unable to assemble enough lots to meet the minimumlot area. Second, 'the limitation of the allowable density would',increase;the- chances that the site design would comply with all the development standards, design guide"ines and policies as with those for larger parcels. " G A 5-acre minimum is_proposed for projects wishinV,to develop under ,the • Optional , :Standards. i Optional Standards ,exist to allot for development at a higher end of the density rangy.,, Acw (L+)`and how Medium (fi,M) Residential Districts already require a minimum of 5 acres. Establishing the 5-acre minimum lot'area, in the Optional Standards would be•i consistent with the other deveiopment districts. j b. F•tablish a minimum lot width for` Basic Standards. Existing: •N '- 80-foot;a.ot width -.30=£oot,corner lot width MH - No m9nid= :.Pga;rement ,. H No minimum 4uirement yr' Qa r} , PLANNING C^MMISSIC)N �TAFF REPORT o DCA 9T 22, TVPCA 91-02, VPCA 91-02, LSPA 91-02 - r ; 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 10, 1991 Page A Proposed: H -rL300-foot lot width 50-toQt corner lot width FiFi:{ Same as above same as above - Analysis: At one of the Commission workshops, members of the Commission }sought up the issue of tcieii.mum lc'_ width as a result of reviewing a couple of-a' v lot (, spulti-family projects„ The concerns, were with the design of 'f;�the entry to the project and the l _ streetSce,pt#,:.' EUtcbllsbirg a minimum. lot width of"`100 feet would facilitate nw;e spacious site, plans -t?annd comply with the minnimum site design criteria. These r- a design criteria could .include an estimated 401:4.t'.-( i entry driveway,' a 40400t estimated .building', footprint, and an apt roxi.mate 15-20 foot setback from' the property line. "This new stz..Ozrd could impact j j some of the lots, on 19th Street'anO,Arrow Highway. 0. Modify and' establish new standards for 7uilding separations and setbacks from C zoperty line,f1; Basi,-, and optional Standards. Analysis: The t staaces between buildings and the setbacks from proprty line are established to provide for as element .of openness and hi4nan- scale. Unfortunately, the minimum standards becone the design ,maximum"in many projects. The Commission 51AW a - .d to iIDoro" the standards.,that will be eousirj ent"wath the policies in the CommmUty Pesllgn Ele"nt of the General Plan. Under .the Basic Standards for tile Medium Residrntlal District, the,building separation is 30 feet for front can front s bathe buildings have �patio s£tutetion ed 4t snort j �0'5 feet for gs s encroached ir;to the , -' 30 feet separation dicta- N leaving perhaps 5-10 feet t for- landscaping and-pedesirian walkways ' Thus; the = J y separation between `the buildings appears to be closer. The new standards, as shown in Exhibit "F ^ J, indicate that the building separation__un�r the Medium Residential District appears' tad.~8m decreased. However, staff added a prnvisioa thei will regi=_ire?all building separations or setbacks to be measured from 4 any enclosed balcony or euclose1,�patio 3 feet or move ht. This, in effect s will increase the dls*ancbetween buildings. For Medium Ri,gh and High ti Fesidentiai-_:13tricts, the building sepa,"tions are l half the combined height of the two buildings. Staff + ;'_ expected S)that any ds¢elopm6nt within these two PLANNING COi -ZSSIOH $TAFF:r:POk9 ti DCA 91-02i.-'TvpCA 91-02, VPCA'91-02, ESPA 9 ;Q2 CITY OF RAN-Hq CUCJV40NGA•_, July 10, 1991 Page 5 districts may include a mix of twa-, three-, or four- story buildings. By k:sing this formula to determine -" the distances for, balding, separation, it would _ achieve the, goal of providing openness within ,the project. For example, a three e'oiy"'building feet in height and a two-story buil33iig"'of 25 feet in height would requ:.re a. dist:ii2de separation of 3J feet. .Again, the 43tances, ''are measured. from any enclosed Balcony or patio, addition to, the building "separation,, -..ether ,new stand=,;-ds are `J — 'stablishod, as shown in-Exhibit. IF to_achieve fhe ,ob;�ective's"of viCsually softening terse•building bulk, the building edgzs, and, the �iensjly. Illustrative _ graphics for these new standards~;sre developed to reiterate and suFkbrt them. Staff �.\ould like to acknowledge the assistance of Lewis Homes who'ass stEcl Fin the development. these graphic i7:3�stxafiuns'. � d. Re creational Area/Facility. Existir_;: Required recreational amenities such as pools, spas, courts, and recreation rooms l within common open space. AWL proposed: Require speT,%'-Aq� tapes' of ametk'�Us for. projects under .,-n its, pXoje t4 31-100 units, and pro,8cts over 700 units; as shown in Exhibit a r.." N` Analysis: Altho[tgh tha �-^ie currently requires ; ertlonal amenities,:as d`e,.eribed above, within Uie k",,lon open space, there.are xk; provisions regulating the,amount of amenities provided to the size of the mu7�ai-family project. The Commission saw:a ntvi to ,pF,, Ke the existing g codes by estabLi+�hing n�u %IK—ards for requiring Amenities. ,The uew codes set M-x;; crum standards for providing recreational- amenities by the sire of the project whit `'also provding .lexi!*i ity to the developer arv, to the`'4 a of :>ienities' offered. Provisions are ,added tc`r:.Yvire 1-„oiler and logical dispersal. `of, recreational amenities. This provision Is added to awvid ttipr concentration of all of the amenz" within"any one common open space _r,a. e. Estal, sh now standards for project�`&Menities to incluat,exterior lockake storage spade,ani laundry facii _.es as ghawn is Exhibit �, ," annd as i o'ilows: 1 GEtterlor , .nckable storage spac�^ of 125. iv A 1.;et. ' // l 701-4( JULY10,5' ' 9� ;P.G. AGEND :r ,C o �J PLANNING CO:MKISSION STAFF DEPORT DCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, VPCA 91-02,-ESPA 91-02 - CITY'nF .RANCHO CACAM014GA f duly 10, 1991-' -� Page 6 7 `•ii Each a^it shal?`be furnished witli washers/dryers in the interior or common facility provided at rate o�' one washer/dryer per five units. Analysis: The purpoae of establishing the new standard is to enhance the quality of�life for the residents (homeowners or renters alike) within multi- family y projects. Further"', this new standard Would be consistent with the requirements as contained in the current-'Condominium Conversion Ordinance. , f. Establish new ;standards requiring proper signage to , identify visitoi)parking as shown in Exhibit "I." t„ Analysis: The concern is that visitor parking spacges are not properly id-antified,where visitors may;find it:' hard trying to locate them. Also, visitor parking spaces are often used by residents if they c'4e..,not properly ,signed. The nevi 'atandards requt{toj the developer or the applicant4o d:�'1mir. a'signage package for visitor parking to the City Planner for review and approval. Signage may ,.,include individual signs labeled on the pavement, div,,story',sn gns, etc. 2. Absolute Policies :The Development Code has Absolute P61i.ci.es that are intended to deal with the issues of neighborhood compatibility, Mitigate land use co-flicts through buffering, quality site plane ciramlation, and architectural compatibility, etc., as shown in Exhibit At these workshops, the Commission reviewed the 'J language and found it adequate. The only, mo(Oication that the Commission proposed :is to change the ,Oiord can,, to "shall" for one of the land use mitigation measures as identified in ixhibit "J." The purpose is to strengthen the requirements for transition of density. 3. Design Guidelines The Development Code has Design Guidelines whi, h establish a high quality standard for building, and,site design. These guidelines are based;c:n the coadiunity design goals as expressed in the Genera' Plan. The Commission, has reviewed these guidelines and, in general, agreed that they are, adequate in eusuri641,'bigh quality ,design. !iowever, several areas should be str?agthened and upgrad,2 to be more reflective of the corwiiiaity design goals as stated in the General Plan. 1I'he� proQosed changes are 'as shown in Exhibit "V and are in bold print.' 0 qJ � � "PLANNING,CO.'9MISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 91-02, TVPCA '91-02, VPCA 91-02, ESPA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO'_-UCiMONGA, - auly 10e 1991 Afth Page 7. r a. Bu4lding orientation: Language added t�i encourage-,a variety of building design. f Parkin: Language added to require -ills for sep'-.,�tionietween individual single, double,, ulti garage uniti� ,8ssigned to that unit. Also, the? 'reside dimension af�'the single garage unit increased 10 feet by 20. feet. C. Landscaping/Open7 1 t, Space: iangua�<:, added to a en � i 9 i the requirement for large` masses of op� _,;space cc_i�istsnt with the 'alicies 'gas stated in the Community Design Element of tbie General Plan. it d. Arc hitectu-e: The language was modified to explicitly state ,thaUmulti-family projects should have upgraded architecture. e. Scale: o Language was added to require proportionate mass and scale of buildings both horizontally and vertically. This language is' consistent with the policies a3 stated in the Community Design V_dent of the f6endral Plan. f Mater'tjis and`Color: Language added to strengt hen the need�i .or choice of materials and color that compliment, the'irchitecture and building character. ^, 4. Related items not part of the Dev<.opment Code Amendment. At the workshop's, the Comission raised concern with how to ensure high quality design ,.for multi-family projects reflective of the City's desire, how' to inform the development co-Mity-of high standards of design and how to ensure quality of landscape materials. To zddzlass the Commission's concerns, staff recommends that a suppi(imental questionnaire be developed requiring the devel� sr to submit information supporting the merits of thecde" "gpment proposal- Staff also indicated an interim carnet,,�h"), , of the.; design guidebook for multi-family projector`could 'be preps ed to assist . the development c community ':tn designing projects consistent with the, City's desigl j goals. staff also prepared a Resolution amending the previous one by strengthening the policy to require landscape' archite 4+�'s to inspect the .qualitY of the landscape materials prior to,planting;' These requirements and p4pcedurau are described below: /Jf - I/ PLANNING COMMISSION STArF REPORT DCA 91-02,:TVPCA 91-02, 'VPCA 91-02, ESPA 91-02.- CITY OF RANCHO'CUCAMONGA July 10, 1991 Page 8 a. supplemental Questionnaire. The format for this - supplemental requirement is as shown in Exhibit "L." The burden of proof is on the developer and his �> designer to :'articulate in written form, gra1)hic illustrations, or a combination of bothi now the proposed development meets each one of the Absolute Policies and Design G.0,4elines. The ,evelopment Ca" specifically requires'*at all resr` �jntial projects must satisfy the Absolute Policies and Design Guidelines before approvfl can be granted. ,. Staff, would' review the supplemental questionnaire foi completeness and adequacy. ' Upon''completeness, of the supplemental questionnaire$ the City planner or his designee would make determination if the development proposals meet and satisfy each one of the policies and guidelines' prior to forwarding the project' for Planning Commission consideration. This new requirement and procedure,would hopefully achieve the objective of ensuring high quality'design. b. Draft chapter of Di �n Guidebook 2or multi-family project. The Desia a.fidebook,is on the planning ,cork program, hcwever,,,�._-. behJmd in schedule. In order to aldress the`Commj.ssa.ori's :concerns on informin/ithe development I community of quality design, 'staff prepared 'a draft ,-haiiter of tine Design. Guidebook`for multi-family projects as an interim` solution. `The format ,of the Design Guidebook is as shown in Exhibit„/ "M." Section 1 clearly states the design goals of the F City. ,Section 3 lists the dasigzi objectives or design „ rgoals as expressed in the 'Genera]`,Plan followed by more specific criteria including graphic illustrations. The grag:Lic illustrations provided are simple and rough. This draft chapter of the Design Guidebook is not complete. Staff will contirie to prepare' and add to the Guidebook -pertinent design criteria with the accompanying graphics. Eventually when staff is ready to prepare the entire design _gei.debook this chapter--will be incorporated. C. Proposed' amendment to Resolution No. 88-161. The 3 Commission on August 10, 1988, adopted a formal policy requiring registered Landscape Architects to prepare,. certify,- and inspect the installation of landscape materials and irrigation sgstems. _ At the, workshop, ,S the Commission raised concerns with• the quality of l ' landscape materials, specifically trees, shrubs,, and ground cover. To address the; concern, staff recommends that the existing policy be strengthened,,,to require the Landscape Architect to inspect and cert.f , the quality of the landscape materials r for }to c planting. ,� F' f PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT'. DCA 91-02, xVPCA 41 -02, VPCA 91-02, ESPA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 10, 1991 Page 9 3 Planned Communities. At the workshops,\the Commissi'm reviewed ;l the roiaparisen of Development standards among the Development. Cede, the two planre3 communities (Victoria and Terra Vista'), "and .•ti_e Etiw"da Specific Plan (see Ek`iibit "C"). The comparison showed�,thac there ar4 discrepancies and differences in the-development`s}andards, specifically the,,street setbacks, building separations,, and building setbacks from the property line. Alvq,,' the community plan text lacked general &« , guidelines ald criteria for transition of ;density_ me of establishing� ' yni - hing t;ie The_Commission reco` zed.. that at the time I_!' two- olanned communities, additional open space.- and open space linkages were set>aside in exchange .for flexibility 'in the street setback. The Co7ission directed staff to Bring the ' standards of the two planned communities into coas-Istency with one anot�-r Representatives from bath,property"owners, Lewis Homes an} William Lyon Company, agreed. The following sections describe qnd discuss the proposed changej, �Eo the tro community plan texts, !',. 1 Victoria Pl'suned Community. � a. ModiF High f` street setbacks for f3et3 tum, Medium High, ,a^.d g Residential Districts as 'shown in Exhibit "0... The':modification reflects: tAd setback as measured from the ultimate;surb.i'ace''consistent with'the Terra Vista Planned Community and—citywide ,a�, . The street e setback for arterial streets, xcept for Victoria Parkway, have been increased from 32 to 38 feet. b.` Establish a''mew a" ndard requiring the addition of a ! 0 foot setback when, tte project is adjacent to Very Lora,or Low'Resideztial'.Diatricts. Thie new standard I! would be consistent with ther I Development Code Standards. The purpoe^, is to all6r for ,•a proper .=buffer, one between conflicting land uses' i c. Establish new building separations'- and setback standards from the property line by referencing the standards as contained in the Development Code. d. Erw.� blish new provisions by adding language requiring cluster development or multi-family projects to comply with the Design Guidelines as contained in 'the Development Code. e. Add new provisions requiring transition of density as contained in the Development Code. - cl PLANNING'COMMISSION ST:hFF REPORT, DCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-0'l, VPCA:91-02,'ESPA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,1 July 10 1991 Page 10 2. Terra Vista Planned Community. a. Modify the street setback for local, collect or ''and secondary streets by increasing"the standards to be `` consistent with victoria Planned Community and as shown'in'Exhibit "P." b. Establish a new standardrrZquiring the addition of a project adjacent to 'Very Low f or Low rbRea dentialDistricts consistent with_the standards in the Development Code.' c. Establip% new:" building saparations and setback standards from the property line by adding languages referencing Ole standards as contained in. the_ Development cede. d. Establish new provisions by^add ing`language requiring multi-family projects to cGmply ,with the Design Guidelines as contained in'th,;Y.'Develcpment Code. e. Add new provisions requiring:''the transitiont5of density as contained in the Development Code, Copies of the proposed changes to the two planned communitiesr were--distributed to the two property,;owners, Lewis Homes- and William Lyon, Company. Staff has met with them to review the pr•.,posed amendments. They have agreed to most of, th= proposed amendments. C., Etiwanda Specific Plan: In reviewing and comparing the multi- family development standards between the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, the Commission determined that the Specific Plan has adequate provisions to guide multi4amily projects. Therefore,:amendments''are not necessary.. D. Environmental Assessment: The proposed amendment consists of changing development standards and desig n guidelines which would not -create a significant impact to the environment. Staff recommends issuance ofNegative Declarations.. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning,Commission must make the following findings in order to approve, in all or in Bart, the proposed amendments: A. Development Code Amendment 91-02. i 1. The proposed amendment does not conflict,with they land use policy of the General Plan. PLANNIOG C014HISSION STAFF,REPORT DCA 91-02, TVPCA 91-02, VPCA 91-02, ESPA 91-02 CITY OF'RANCRO CUCAMONGA July 10 1991 P,gge 11 2. The .,proposed] amendment promites the; goals and objectives of the General Plan. 3. The proposed amendment would not, be materially injurious or detr'mental to adjacent properties or. have a significant impact on the environment. $. Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-02. 1. The ro amendment Is wnsis a proposed P. t nt with the.goals and objectives of the Specific Plan and the General Plana 2. The proposed amendment would not harj significant ;� impacts on the environment :nor the surrounding properties. C. Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 91-02. 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and obje.,tives of the Specific Plan and-the General Plan. AMML f 2. The proposed amendment will not have significant Impacts on the environment, nor the surirounding properties. V. CORRESPONDENCE: ,The abode described proposed arendments have been advertised in the In?andJValley Daily Bulletin newspaper as a public hearing under as 1/Sth page ad. In addition, public hearing notices were sent to all property owners*that have land designated as Medium, Medium High, or,High Residential Districts and without a development.__ proposal. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning ;Commission conduct a public nearing to review the proposed amendments and to consider public input. The following actions are requested from the Planning Commission: A. Approval of Development Code Amendment 91-02 and issuanc6-, of a Negative Declaration to the City Council B- Approval of Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-02 and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City'Council. C. Approval Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 91 2 and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council. D. Table, the Etiwanda'Specific Plan Amendment 91-02A. E. Adoption of a Resolution amending Resolution No. 88-161. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 91-02,'TVPCA 91-02, VPCA 91-02, ESPA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July' 10, 1991 Page 12 .a Respe lly submittedF �r Bra ler i City Planner BB:NF:jfs Attachments':. :Exhibit "A" - Summary and Actions of April 4, April 11, April 25, and May 8, 1991 Workshops, Exhibit "B" - Approved'Minutes,,of April"4, and „ Unapproved Minutes of April 11, April 25, and May 8, 1991 Adjourned Meetings Exhibit "C" - Table,I Comparison of Street Setbacks Exhibit "D" - Table 17.08.040 B - Basic Development b' Standards Exhibit "E" - Table 1d,.08.040-C - Optional Development Stamt lyds ff_ Exhibit "F" - Take, 17.08 040r� - Building Separations L and Setbacks ` Exhibit "GI - Section 17.08.040-G - Recreation/Facility Exhibit "H" - Section 17.08.040 R - Project Amenities Exhibit "I" - Section 17.08.040-x -!Visitor Parking Exhibit "J" ->Section 17.08.050 - Absolute Policies, Exhibit "K" = Section 17.08.090. - Lesign Guidelines Exhibit "L" Supplemental Questionnaire Exhibit "M" - Draft Chapter of Design Guidebook Exhibit "NO - Amendments to Resolution 88-161 Exhibit "O" -_Amendments to Victoria Planned Community Exhibit "F" r'Amendmetts to Terra Vista Planned Community y Proposed Resolution Amending Resolution No. 88-161Ii Proposed Resolution Recommending'Anpx3val of DCA 91-02 Proposed Resolution Recommending Appr',Rval of TVPCA 91-02 Proposed Resolution Recommending Appr8`v;!1 of:VPCA 91-02 Proposed Ordinance for DCA 91i02 Proposed-Ordinance for TVPCA 91-02 Proposed Ordinance for VPCA 91-02 P tt ir C �y it Adftk SUMMARY AND ACTION PLANNING C®.ivaffSSIPNWORIT'-'-/11 S ON MULTI-FAMILY STANDARDS 4-4-91 ' 4-11=91 4-25-91 5-8-91 L Transition of Density and Buffering. The site plan should consider compatibility with surrounding neighborhood particularly,,on in-fill site adjacent to lower densities. Compitrable,,densities , open space buffer zone , increase setbacks , architecture e'anpatibility are encouraged along common",.boundaries to provide proper',`Aransition of density and buffering. A. Development Code, 1. The Development Code has provisions that address buffering and transition of density by increasing-the setbacks. from 15 feet 'ft 25 feet When the multi-family project is ,adjacent to- lower density districts. Staff believes that the standards are achieving the objective in providing buffering between conflicting<,,Jand uses. Perhaps the area where the a standard could be improved is 1j, 'require additional setback for 2 story building, fie✓✓cs ® adequate inadequate ❑ improvement needed as follows (second story sv_fnrb� develop new standard's as follows _ ❑ "-•.► ff recommendation acceptable STAFF COMMENT: Clear direction. (d 25-91 workshop) EXHIBIT A DCA 91-02.TVPCA 91-02,VPCA 91-M ESPA 91-02r! P.C.1-10 91 1 v,,, 2. To address neighborhood compatibility, the Devetopxri ent Code has provisions that require buildings within 100 feet of adjacent tingle family residents to be,.one story. One area of improveent is to require additional ' setback to within c200 feet for 2 story building's.,,,.) O adequate` ® inadequate S ® improvement needed as follows ✓m!✓VU develop now standards as follows C1 staff recommendation acceptable STAk-P COMMENT.- Staff 'recommends that the setback for two story building be increcsed from "100 feet to 150 feet.' This item was tasted by the t:onamissian ( -11,91) .L r. 3. The Development 'Code has absolute policies,, ""'; design guidelines .} that are intended to deal with the issues of neighborhooi �^yompa+tibility acid mitigate land use conflicts)through,buffering , gtality si.e"plan circulation. architectural compatibility ,etc. These languages' are as shown in'Exhibit A and B. To further implement these.,-?olicies and guidelines- staff P ! recommends adding a regt rement wib);a the-,developer has to submv a"F detailed description of he;, the' proposed multi-family project meet these established policies and ggidelines ;"' CI adequate a inadequate -0 improvement needed as follows t >: ✓✓✓®►'✓® staff recors+latendation'ry accep;able STAFF COMMENT This new requirement would not., necessitate any amendment to the Developmenv Code. , Staff could implement this requirement by establislaiaa& new procedures for future residential application. The new Ipros-"dures '>ould apply to both the single ,family and mu tt-family develo i ment applications.. Additional time needed to develop. the new procedures �' � rr 4. One of the design policies in the h,i?xelopm_0,I Code states the entil�l site plan cans be oriented so that\ tlae r'activities and functions are aligned hierarchically placing those `teast compatibf� furthest from the adjacent single family use and the most compatible near that boundary , e.g. single family homes or duplex to single family homes single story adjacent to single story etc. ❑ adequate Y. d inadequate ✓✓d D improvement needed as foltowb" Eca an"cha:age to "shall") develop new policy as follows STAFF COMMENT: Done , see Exhibit A-t B. Planned Community In' reviewing the two Planned Communities do0t;.tents and comparing them with the Development Code staff found„there are,no or minimal provisions in areas W transition of density and buffering ,As a policy, staff has applied the Development Code standards L projects ii`jrthe Planned Communities ✓ ® ;adequate „ ✓ 0 add design policies and guideli,rIes to the two Planned communities consistent with thi- Developtent Code . ✓✓ 0 establish new design 'policies 'a t-': guidelines to the two Planned Communities as :lose to file Development Code as ' V possible. STAFF COMMENT. Clear direction. Commission ,. direct ed staff to add the Transition of Density language from the Development Code to the 2 Planned Communities.(5-8-91) C Etiwanda Specific Plan. In reviewing the Specific Plan , staff found that there are sufficient � design olicies and P guidelines established to ensure multi-family developments in Etiwanda aaea maintain the rural atmosphere. ( see Exhibit E) Q3 0 Commsission- a reed. Na . g further action needed. Yi 3�-, .. 'tom ,A lI. Op_n Space. AQ t, Common open space should be provided in concentrated area large enough to provide opportunities for active uses by groups . Pedestrian connections"' between open space areas should be provided. The attached Tahle IV shows` :he comparison of percentage of ,open space in the Development Code, the two Planned Communities and the,Etiwanda Specific Plan . A. Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan. 1, The Percentage of open space ( private and common ) for multi-family Projects in general City area is 35 b and 40 % { Basic and Optional Standards respectively ) The percentage of open space' in Etiwanda area is 40 % The issue is whether the percentage of open space is adequate. The increase in epen space without a decrease in density, intensify the scale of the project, VVVV ® adequate U inadequate 0 improvement needed as follows Alm STAFF COMMENT: No further action needed. 4b erg 2. Recreational amenities. Within large- areas of common open space recreational amenities s Puch as pools spas tennis courts recreational room etc., should be rovided Although the ,Development Code has provisions'requiring such amenities , there are no provisions regulating the amount of amen%,ties to the size of the mriti family projects . For example , the number and size Of pools to the numbej of units . eta. Perhaps this is one area where the !1 codes could be improved, thus improving the overall' quality of life for multi-family proje'o* , is current Codes acceptable. ✓moo/✓ current Codes need improvement as follows lestablish standaPds? ST'AJ'F COMMENT: Clear direci_o,:,�. Addi al research, needed to develop the new standards. t�, l B. Planned'Community. There is no provisions`{,for minimum percentage of open'space in the 2 Planned . Communities. The amount of, !fen space provided are as proposed ' by the developers and as modified through the Design Review process ;. In practice, staff applies the open space standards in the Development `Code to the projects in the Planned Cornmunit es ✓✓ ❑ adequate ✓✓ ❑ amend the 2 Manned Communities to ado minimum % of open space consistent with the Development Code: STAFF COMIMIENT d't war the consensus of the Comnaa����,.,f that the practice of ',,iapplying the , opera space standards ra the Ileveloptn"- t Code to the projects in the Planned Communities is adequate. III. Site Design. jft A. Streetscape. The setback standards for landscape, building and parking along, public ' streets are vital in shaping and identifying the functions of street and to improve the scenic quality of the community .The attached Table I shows the comparison of street setbacks within the Development Code, the 2�. Plz paned Communities and Etiwanda Specific Plan f 1. Development Code The street setbacks in t]Lz' Development Code are more stringent than the 2 Planned Communities . ✓✓✓ ❑ adequate ® inadequate q improvement needed as follow ,(relclrtinn to nark could �a nartl p STAFF COMMENT: No further action needed.?,Q9t?7�j'` a �� �� 5 ' 2. Planned Community " "Ibe street setbacks within the 2 Planned Communities are. less st ngznt when compai�.- to general city area. Maybe,�this is an area fhat is, worth modifying. O increase' the street setbacks consistent with Development° Code standards in all aspects ® increase the street setbacks for major arterial and secondary streets consistent with the Development Code standards ✓✓✓✓✓U increase the streets setbacks to be as close to the Development Code standards as possible.-in all aspects STAFF _COMMENT: Clear direction. Additional research needed to develop standards for the 2 Planned Communities. Commission directed staff to bring the setbacks standards of the 2 Planned Communities consistent to one another, (5-8-9I). B. Building ;Orientation. 1. Buildings in multi-family pre jects should be skewed , angled in relationship to each other, to create a variety of view orientation for increased interest and openness I,Buildings should cluster around common facii3ties. Attached dwelling should be staggered to provide relief and a ,, sense of variety. d✓d✓✓O yes, as "general" broad iIntement but not in the Planned' Communities: a agree with language as design guidelines agree with modification 0 disagree STAFF COMMENT. Done , see Exhib t B.I. 2. The General Plan has specific policies in the Community Design Element thaw emphasize a balanced and proportionate appearance for buildings in their horizontal and vertical scale e.;g. by the use of projection or')recession of stories, balconies, windows and doors aiid changes in roof level; or planes.. This is especially so for multi-family projects.-Staff recommends that the above Ianguage could be added as design guidelines to the Develo ment Code the .2 Planned Communities text and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. ✓u"e�'✓�/® agree and add to all' documents. ❑ agree and add to to the following documents 0 disagree j c� STAFF COMMENT Proposed language added to the Development Code as shown in Exhibit B-I. "Also, staff recommends that language be added referencing all Design Guidelines in the Development Code to the 2 'Planned! Communities Thi would be the simplest way of ame;tdireg the 22 Planned Communities Text i and also maintaining`ome flexibility for them C Building Separations and Setbacks from Property Line. I The distances between buildings' and the setbacks from property lines are- established to provide for...,an element of openness and human scale:. Unfortunately , the minimum, standards become the 'design maximum in many existing projects. Perhaps this is an area for improvement in modifying or establishing new standards. The attached` Tables II and III show the comparison of-' building separations and setbacks within the Development Code, the 2 Planned:: Communities and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, 1. Development Code, E Under the Basic standards, the buiiding separations require are 30 feet for buildings fronting onto each other , and IS.,,feet for other situation -. Staff believes that the standard achieve the objective of providing openness if the buildings i are one story. The 'distance between buildings that are two j story high should be increased.: © adequate ® inadequate ❑ agree with staff suggestion d✓✓�' 0 develop new standards (arch"t cturmassing critical) STAFF COMMENT: Clear direction. Additional research needed to develop the new standards. 0�1 Staff to prepare graphics. Lewis Homes ,Pffered assistance. �7 'r'''l t �l 2. Planned Community. %f In r et iewiei g Tables TI and II..x the standards for building separation and setbacks ire much less stringent than- the standards in :the Development Code Tl: s' is an area where,iimpravement to the standards should be explored . ❑ ainenc: the 2 Planned Communities by increasing the standards be as,;,close to the Development Code as possible. ✓�✓✓✓❑ amend the 2 Planned Communities> by increasing the standards, to be consistent with the DeveI1 vment STAFF COMMENT: Clear direction .Addit;onai time needed to ` prepare the amendment. 1 (g> Do Driveway/Circulation. Driveways in' multi-family projecis should be treated streetscape with curvilinear lanes and streets-We landscape. Star€ recommends adding the language as design guideline to the Development Code. ❑ agree and add to the Development Code and the 2 Planned Communities. ah/tO�dQ disagree STAFF COMMENT. No further action needed. O w w" lE Minimum Trot Area. The Development Code has no provisions'requiring a minimum lot area for multi-family proindt. In Terra Vista Planned,Community , the,ftinimum ;lot area for M and,hM Districts is 1 acre and 2 acres for H District: . In Victoria Planned `otnmuoity, the minimum lot area is 3 acres. Since t3ie City expects 'r AMk higher quality site,design, requiring a minimum' lot area would provide the opportunity for efficient and ,quality design ' :. a/eaVVVU agree and add standards to the Development Code U disagree STAFF COMMENT:` Clear dire'Ot �qn.`' Staff, recommends requiring1 V_ acrc as the miximusn lot area for she Basic Deivelopment - Standards and 3 acres for the .OpCiona' Development Standards. For development at the higher density r nge ,<.1arzer -lot,-area would allow the opportunity `. Pp y far effieierat wind,%�uaclat� :site alesig,s See Exhibits E and F . ��' \� Commission directed staff to increase .the minimum lot area to 3 , acres for Basic; ,Standards. (5-8-91) _ IV. Architecture. t Building design is probably the most important aspect of community design. Buildings represent the living and working environment of/=most people. Therefore, the architectural 'design of buildings' especially multi-family Projects should exhibit quality innovation in fornt'andlTuaction ;< A. Development Code' \: 4 1.. The Development Code has 'absolute polaris and design guidelines that require the designing ,of multi-family, buildings., to be compatible to adjacent single family homes._Buildings' should be proportionate in their massing and scale-The materials and color chosen should complement the building character Staff finds the current pot_.,cies and guidelines adequate._:; However , they r could be expounded tee be more reflective ofthe r,olicies as contained in. the Community Design Element of the General Plan. U ...adequate ❑ inadequate , ❑ improvement needed as follows zitaff';,recommendations 'acceptable ' STAFF lone , see ,Exhibit ,B-d &. B.S. - " ° ;: � rR t � l 1. ' 1,j t R Architectural Compatibility -j {j To provide for compatibility the structures of multi-family buildings could be designed to present an image of large, scale single family structures 0 ; agree and add! criteria y. l� agree with further modifi>:ation 13 disagree rt J STAFF COMMENT: :Ne further action Howexle staff.,"ingy explore the idea of developing graphic and written_ crzt T' - added tee " the � ,Future Resign guid nk...,, r - C Multi-family proj--- 'a ld have a var1rt7j of :.dwelling design. The building design =.631__ .avoid sameness and blandness ' .Fxcesst%le: " repetition of simii.x structures ;with identical footprint`,and elevations should be discouraged Staff recommends adding this'criieria as a design guideline and establishing new standards requiting a,,minimum,number of footprint as well a;, a minimum number of elc`vations per footprint., ®. agree Ci disagree STAFF COMMENT: No.lifI rther action However, staff may explore the idea of devei4ins"„�ritte�;' and graphic criteria to be added` to the future Design Guidebooks. D In multi-family`'project, the stt'nctures are noimilly. larger and more monotonous since the same unit are clustered into Alex, h-plex , IO-plea 12-plex em: . To create a variety in dwelling design, now standards could b;. added requiring a maximum number of units that cou4 cluster in one building and/or requiring a mix of unit type in any one building 0 agree with staff su;gestion Q disagree with staff suggestion i 10'M STAFF COMMENT:NT: No farther,. action. However, staff may explore the idea of developiNg written and graphic` criteria to be added to the future. Design Guidebook. E To provide for flexibility in building design Iarger structures such,,as 12 piex or more may be considered if the design meet the following criteria: 1, one of a:kind design 2. footprint is designed to'fit the project""*any and•not a standardize off the shelf ""model building 3, outstanding architecture with attention 'to details which do not i? project an image,of " tag on facaae 4. quality building materials that contribute to,.aie building character. 0 .agree with staff suggestions Q disagree with staff suggestions% r r. STAFF COMMENT: No fuf "ber''arctIvn. ftoweyer, staff may explore the idea of developing writteh and graphic criteria to he added to the future Design (guidebook. 6%e Wtt.ANk e�L V. Landscaping. ,r The strategic placement at significant design ocadons of matui;z_„trees would enhanced the strcetscape view I of multi-family projects.;` Sensitive landscaping can soften the-sharp visual 'contrast,between two abutting land uses by subduing the differences in architecture and bulk and by providing a gradual transition rather than a harsh edge between uses. A. Dev,lopment Come - 1. The development Code has standards requiring a minimi=?q numbcr of trees for each project; based on the Development Districts. The codes also specify the percent mix of sizes of trees.; Staff believes that the number of trees require for each project is adequate. However, the area that can be improved to further implement the 'absolute policies and design guidelines is to increase the percentage mix of the trees and the size of them. as shown in exhibit C . ® agree with staff recommendations Q disagree with staff recommendations CrI 11 _� r STAFF COMMENT: Staaf f' will modify the'-' landscape and irrigation Policies by strengthening the� language to require the landscape architect to conduct quality inspection on salt landscape materials. f See attached Resolution no.88-161. + 2. Sufficient and sizable 8aitdsca pad areas are important to visually soften the building bulk, the edges and the density. Based on field-,observation I of existing multi-family projects,, staff concluded that various type of landscaped area such as building to uncovered or"covered parking spaces, to �drivewa s to y = paojeca eutsies etc and: as,shown in exhibit D ,; are inadequate as to the size , the depth; and the 'width Staff recommends adding new standards in an attempt to rectify the inadequacy . ✓✓e'"✓D agree with staff recoinmendatians DdisagrEe Wath oaf recommendations STAFF COMMENT: Clear direcdion. Additional time need' 'd to jF prepare for the amihdment. B. Planned Community. Ah Since the 2` Planned Communities do not have -landscape standards as described above the landscape ,standards in the Development Code would apply, VI, Parking, I A. Parking requirements The Development Code requires ''n percent of the required parking to be garaged and the remainder percentage to be open parking spaces. da/�� ❑ current codes adequate fcancerned with citir¢.•�r �o�orl V C' current codes inadequate U. improvement needed as follows STAFF OMMENT: Clean direction. Additional research€, ded to deve'op thi, standards. ® ® 12 1 Vy `6'� B. Visitor parking. ` 0T 1. The minirrum standards for visitor parking is 1`space,per 4�units. Also , the location of the visitor parking spaces roust be wain 1'50 feet of each unit . ❑ current code adequate ❑ current code inadequate improvement needed as follows STAFF COMMENT: Clear direction.' Visitor parking standard is adequate. , but add nets;. standards (,requiring 'proper sign-.Iq of the vistcr parking spac s ( 5-5-11 ): „ V II Project amenities To enhance the quality of life for multi-family projects, additional amenities_ could be,provided . They are/lasted as follows: 1: l?r vide RV parking spaces in addition to the jS� uired q parking spaces: d✓d '� ❑ agree with staff recommendations disagree with staff recommendations ®`'modify as follows l STAFF COMMENT: Unclear dirt ion 3319 SIC 2.L Provide a minimum square #jJ rage of lockable storage space within the individual unit , the cargiSrt/garage assigned to that unit or in a centralize('; areas similar to a rlaundry facility._ With regards to the minimum square footage : _ ��' �ti „taff recommends establishing the standard similar to the condo conversion standard which- is 125 cu,ft, per unit VVVVVQ' agree with staff rit,.ommendations - -disagree with staff reeommendaddens ® modify as follows_l''i STAFF COMMENT: Cleats dire-fr,,n. Staff, taill prepare new;. r standards to be gadded to the Development Code. r, 13 �, 3. Provide. interior washerl'Jryer _ hook up for each unit This requirement would brim I the "standards of apts cIoser to condos. One alternative is to establish a minimum percentage of units {' e.g. 50 % a that are require to havw washer/dryer hook pup, .Another alternative is to require common laundry. facility to be consistent with the standards in the condo conversion.,which is "I washer/dryer per 5 units ; Ci require washer/dryer hook up for each unit ✓✓✓_✓ .require 59 %,of the units to have washerldryer hook up'and) provide common laundry facility at a rate of 1 washer/drye4, r per 5 units for 6e remainder 50 % of the .units. ✓ Cl .require common laundry facility at a rate of 1 washer/dryer{. per 5 units where no hook up are provided. STAFF, COMMENT. Clear (dgr-Rctiors. dditionat time needed to.i .. _ prepare 'the standards. Commission clarified. that the ne.w standards should require washerldryer ,for each unit or common laundry ,facility at a> rate of I washerldryer per 5 ,'emits. (5•8-p1) 4. Provide recyling bins for newspaper, bottles etc, in the trash ertclosvre areas . ✓✓✓' CI agree with staff suggestions ® disagree with staff suggestions STAFF COMMENT: Clear direction. Additional research needed to C develop the (standards. C�I C> li7iG EM iY ') E=BIT B r 4-4-91 P.C. NU s UNAPPROVED- 4-11 91,4-25-91 & 5-8-91 Py C.IVGNUTES i DCA91-02.- -02 %� P.C.7-10-91 7VPCA 91 r--'.IPCA 91-02 i ESPA 91-02A v: 17 i` i CITY OF RANCHO,CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting T May 8, ;1991 a Chairman McNiel called the ,Adjourned Meeting of the City of Ranch Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 8:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga .Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive,, ,Rancho Cucamonga, C,mlifornia. Chairman McNiel then led in the pledge of allegiance. cj ROLL CALy, COMMISSIONERS:, PRESENT: Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel, John I11 Melcher, Peter Tolstoyy Wendy Vallette ABSENT: None I" STAFF PRESENT: ;P,r"ad Buller, City Planners Nancy Fong, Senior Planner MULTI-FAMILY 'STANDARDS STUDY - CITY OF' RANCHO CtJCAM�iGA - The review discussion o and f various d evelogment standards and. design. guidelines for multi-Aft II family projects. n /1 �, I Brad Buller, City Planner, recommended that the Cons Ias`ion review the that still have an unclear direction as marked in---d staff report. ic( � CommissionerMelcher asked if there is a difference in the qualiy'of development ty between the city-wide area and the two planned communitie also stated that if we 3-c-4 men s. He applying the same standards from the Development Code to the should be the same. two planned communities, then the quality of design Joe Olsen, Lewis. Homes, Stated that at the time of the Community Plan development, a deal was struck with the negotiation of the'Centr exchan e,for some : •ark in g e flexibility of the street setbacks. Mr. Bulger st?ted that the two Planned communities have a whole netwoil of open space. Thf�Commission .raised concerns with the building setbacTss being too close the street. On top of that, the buildings have stairwells and patios,,, encroached into the setback areas which made it worse. Mr. Buller suggestc!d that an alternative to increasing the street setback for the two planned communities is to bring the setback in :consistency with one another. h Representatives from Lewis Homes and the William Lyon Co. ag reed'greed' to this U Valle Commissioner development slated that a design guidebook should be made available £o the development community to assist them in designing projects.- Mr- Huller stated that staff will- propare a . draft chanter of the design guidebook for multi-family projects as an interim solution. He also stated that the graphics in the guidebook will be simple and rough. The Commission. reviewed the language for the new standard requiring solid walls .between""garage ,units•. The majority of. the Commission a5reed with the language. Pete Pitassi, Pitassi/Dalmau Architects, stated that ,this new standard would n requi-re addition ventilation for the gaga a buildings and increased building size as each separation wall would add 5 in�es. Commissioner Tolstoy raised concerns that find ri mult_-famil 1 y t%`i�itor parking areas are hard to c Y pro as the are �prcperly signed. J The consensus of the Commission was Leo sy� ne��i standards re signs and individual signsQ r quiring direct-i ) to identify visi parking areas. Mr. Buller clarified for the Commission that the new standards. for laundry .facilities require interior washer/dryer facilities for each unit or common laundry facilities at a rate of one washer/dryer for each fige'units. J ADJOURNMENT 10:30 m. P• - Planning Commission gdjaurned to a, workshop on May IS, 1391., following Design Review at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Cantr,t, r�+gardinr Ilia Foothill Market Place. a Respectfully submitted, 1� Brad Buller secretary Planning Commission Minutes _y May 8, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES _ Adjourned Meeting April 25, t991 - REVIEW OF MULTI-FAMILY STANDARDS Vice Chairmax Chitiea called the meeting to or`'34 at 3.45 P.M. The meeting was rheld at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Ran�o /yl Cucamonga, CA 91730. \ ! ,v ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Suzanne Ch tiea, Larry McNiel, Peter Tolstoy, JLn Melcher STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior; Planner f; Nancy l-6ng, Senior Planner, Presented the staff report. The Commission had several questions on the current setback standards for multi-family projects when adjacent to single family residents. Nancy Fong clarified to the Commission how the,current standards are applied to those projects. The Commission then decided that£rie current standar&K a adequate.- The Commission further discussed the adequacy of the current standard i> 1 requiring 2-story buildings to be setback 100 feet from the single I iamily residents. =Nancy Fong clarified that the setback is measured from the property line Q, and/or the development district line and not from the singlq family house. f Brad Buller, City Planner, arrived at the meeting. He sugjQsted that the COMMission should review those items that have clear direction first as staff is moving forward for the amendment. Then, when time'permits, the Commission could further discuss those items that need direction. ' ^hairmen McNiel arrived at 4:30 p.m. # On the topic of minimum lot area, commissioner Tolstoy asked h_ow`tmany Tots in the City that would be impacted by the new standard. Cy . 6'c'� f // r - Brad Buller stated thatJstaff could do additional work to find out the - total number of lots that would be substandard. On lockable storage space, the Commission clarified tha' they are to be exterior with exterior access and the design to be architecturally integrated. Alpo, lockable storage space should only be within the enclosed garage and not carport c The Commission then moved onto- those items that have clear .direction but need additional work.: With regards to the ccurrenti;lstandard requiring 2-story buildings to be 100 feet away from,the single family'residents, Brad Buller suggested that the..Commission table thisctopic. The Commission agreed. r+/ The Cal ssion had further discussion as to the requirements of recreat:Uli amenities- Pete Pitassi, Pete Pitassi & Assoiates, suggested that staff look into the park credit Ordinance for additional resource. 4 g With regards to amending the two Planned Communities to increase the street setback to be as close to the Development Code as possible, the Commission suggested that'Lawis Homes and William Lyon Company submit c. new standards for staff review. Lewis Homes and William Lyon Company agreed. Q As for the item concerning building separations and setback from property 'lines, staff will prepare„ additional graphics for the Commission to review. Brad Buller recommended that the meeting be adjourned to the May 8, 1991 regular Commission meeting. f ADJOURNMENT 6:00 p.m. -,,Planning CommIsion adjournied. ILspectfully submittedr Brad Buller Secretary BB•NF: aq_ 0 Planning Commission Minutes : -2 April 2S, 1991 1 CITY OF'RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting April 11, 1991 Vice Chairman Chitiea called the Adjourned Meeting of the city of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order At 3.40 p.m. The meeting Was held in theCouncil Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center,Dgive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 10500 Civic Center ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT; Suzanne Chitiea, Larry MCN,iel, John Melcher, Peter Tolstcy, Wendy Va�ilette ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner!-SNan Fong, cl' _ ng, S 7r Planner MULTI-FAMILY STANDAFDS STUDY — CITY OF RANCHO_CUCAMONGA — The r4I?view and discussion or various develop—me family projects. nu s ds andtandar desi ,guidelines for multi- , Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that the purpose of this meeting was to pick up where we had left off from:the last workshop on April 4, 1991. Jae Olesen, Lewis Homes, submitted to Mr'. Buller at the meeting a; written - response to the April 4, 1991-,Staff Raprrt, Chairiaan McNiel are4, ; at 3:50 p.m. I. TRANSITION OF DENSITY MID BUFFERING 1 A. Development Code There was no consensus from the, current setback ,'Commission regarding the adequacy of the family residents.standards for multi—family projects when adjacent to single Repiesentatives of Lewis Homes and the William Lyon Co.found the current standards adequate. gxodicated that they There was a concensus from the Commission to develop,new standards requiring two-story buildings to setback further than the current standards of 100 feet. f7 Both Lewis Homes,and the William Lyo"tO- stated that the current standarr are adequate. : ; t �r Consensus from the Commission to require developers to articulate in wrytng how they have designed their pr jects to meet the City's po'tic3es, `gin wrinesr AMk and standards. r� Both Lewis Homes and the William Lyon Co. agreed. Commissioners McKel, Tolstoy, and Val],etie stated that thek_agreed with the existing desig'_1 policy as outlined in the_staff report with i.e., to change "can" to "shall." one a difica_3onr Lewis Homes and the William Lyon Co. stated that the current language is fine. B. Planned Community There was no consensus from the Commission whether to amend the=two 'Planned Communities to add design guidelines and pol„ces to 1>s consistent with the Development Code. C. Etiwanda`Specific Plan Concensus from the Commission that current design pr33aies are adequata. No changes will be needed. II. OPEN SPACE ti A. Development Code Concensus from the Commission that the percentage of open space is adequate. NP Consensus from the~dklMlission to develop new standards re amount of recreational amenities. requiring a minimum Commissioner Melcher disagreed stating that the rr'_ ehtional` amenities aze market driven. Lewis Homes and the William Lyon Co. agreed that recreational amenities are market driven acid that the current codes are adoquate. B. Planned Community> Concensus from the Co=ission that the practice of applying the Development Code standards of open space to the two Planned Cun3ties is adequate. III. SITE DESIGti A. Streetsca_pe Concensus from {he Commission that t}e current standards are adequate. Planning Commission Minutes kp;1 ' 11, 1991 Consensus frorii the Commission that the"rtback st-ind rds for the two Planned Communities should be increased to bC jas close}, '� the Developrelt:. Code as q ALPossible. tt e B. 8uildina Orientation Consensus from the Commissicn that the proposed language as outlined in the Staff Report is acceptable as a broad general statement. n Lewis Homes and the William Lyon Co. agreed. is C. Building Se paration -- 4 partition and Setback from Pk ouerty Line Consensus from the 'Commission t the two planned C o develop new standards and add to then int3 n ommunities. Lewis Homes and the William Lyon Co. agreed. D. Drivewav/Circulation The Commission disagreed with staff's reccmmendations. Commissic7ler Vallette stated that the project should have an'2ntry statement. Lewis Homes and the William Lyon Co. agreed.Mith the Commission. 1l E= Minimum Lot Area I Cons ensus from the CO=dssiun to deveiq?) new standards. Commissioner Tolstay stated, Of tshe density range'. .that smaller lots Hhould dsvelcp at tho 'lower end r! IV ARCHITECTMM Consensus from the Commission tm add language as su , to the Drvelapment Code as gge8tec. the Star Report general design guidelines. For i-`ems 8, C, B, and E, Mr, Buller suggested that;ths Commission c them in the.�'sture. onsidered_ . The Commission agreed. 1 S V. LAtvDSCARCNG The G'A1,gmissica was concerned with the quality of material and the maintenance, Commissioner Tolstoy suggested that,we establish standards for the tree spread, i.e., the height to the SiiO of,the trees. planning Commission t+inutes -3- - Ar'it` (11 991 P .1 l� t Mr. Buller suggested that staff could'look into strengthening the existing Policy to require the Ian"cape Architect�?to inspect the material.and'certify them prior,to releasing the project. The Cemmi'ssion agreed. "he Commissio:. further agreed with staffs recommendations in developing new` c .9ndards for`Plandscaped areas such as building to parking,' building ..to G r 4, beway, etc. �ti� VT- PA_ _ING RK iez` iwas no consensus frcAv the Commission_ whether the current part-r,sr Hclards for multi-family projects are adequat�i. }st discussion. <?r. Buller suggested that this subject be pushed for further stud3 and v t The Commission agreed. VII. PROJECT AMENITIES mere was not consensus from the Commission as to developing new standards requiring RV parking spaces in multi-family projects. Lewis-'Homes and the William,'Lyon Co. stated that they 'disagreed with this ;\Proposed-rPqui rement:' ^oncensus from the Commhssion'to develop netiy standards for providing lockable stodge space. Lewis Homes and the William Lyon Co. agreed. ` consensus from -iie Comma ssion to develop new standards 'for requiring washer/dryer and recycling facilities. ADJOORN74EM P-m- Manniz Commission 6:'OD g adjourned to a worksho P 'on May 25, 1991. ResPectfully submitted, Brad Buller Secretary f PlanniA7 CoMissicn Minutes -q- ik April 1�1, 1991 ' i rt II. CONDITIONKI USE PERMIT 88-12 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - Rkview of an interim design solution, in lieu of the construction of Major 4 Ztho d °•wilding H_ within Phase IiI. � Rick Mager, representing Lewis Homes-,�.� �9 a brief overviewwn Center Project. Hii Mager indi.:_Ce9d that the potential tenant r. Major 4 (Child's World) had terminated their expapaion,plann and Lewis M as was working with a new tenant for the building. . He reported the new t ant requires a slightly different building, which necessitates a change the plans. As a result, Lswis Biomes wished to ursue the temporary r' � P, 'barri ,do to alloy Montgomery Wards` :q open prior to the construction of Major 8- Building M. ,.He proposed that the pXLnn accese aerose the front of a building pad.#buld be installed prior s' oponing and will-be main ined during construction of Majo-;A and Bu . The Coern discussed the i us and recommended approval subject to the followitions: {barricade ould be installed prior to the occupancy of tgomery W s.barricade should bs maintained 24 Idurs a day. graphics and 'lettering usesd on the barricade should be siatenttwith the"exicting graphics and lettering of Town Center. the construction of Major 4 and Building M'nose ,ot commenee : within 180 days of the installation of the barricade, the barricade would be removed and the area should be planted an.d irrigated. 5. Any modifications to Major 4 and/or Building M should be reviewed and approved by the,:Design izview'Committee. III. 'MULTI-FAMILY STAtiDUDS STUDY—CITX QF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Tho review and discussion of various development standards and design guidelines for multi-family projects. Brad Buller, City planer, stated that the,format of this worksloq was to go over the Copies. f discua.ion, 'ono by one, au outlined in the staff repor' . ' There was consensus from the Commission to requirethe developer to explain is writing how they designed the project to most the City's policiea, guidelines, and standards. Commissioner Melchar prmferred not to mes cookie-cutter type standards. Commissioner Tolstoy stated the City needs to set minimum standards Stan Bell, Lewis 113mes.- stated he would like to know the minimum standards. Planning Commission Minutes -4 April 4, 1991 ' 4 , r Gary Luque, William Lyon Company, stated that current codes for open space and recreational 'amenities are adequate.. - 46 Jary Cockroft, Lewis KGm�.e stated that the type ofZimehities`would affect the cost of the Homeowner Association (H6A) -fese. Stan Sell, Lewis Homes, said that if the BOA fees are too high, there will not be any bul+ass. Commissioner Tolstoy disagreed with Lewis Homes with ,regar4 to the' r, recreational amenities bsinej.market-driven: - k Commissioner Valletta statedzrhat the community desires quaiity;,proj-acts and Providing ar�enitiea teyond whar-the market indicates in important, Mr.. Huller stated that the diiectioa from'the Lity Council was to have some new standards in place before the next multi-family project. Thy consenaua of the Commission itas that they need more timsr to .review the staff report and provide the dL64=1,on. Another, workshop was scheduled .`Or April I , 11191, at 3z30 p.m, in the'Rains Room,,at the Rasncho Cucamonga'Civic Center,- 10500 ,Civic Center Drive, Rancho ` Cucamonga, California. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30,,p.m. Now Respectfully submitted„ Brad SUL-ir Secretary r, is AM 0 Planning Commission Minutes -5 April 4, 1991 w..F- v' R.T dft 1'ti r� EmTmirr Table 1 Compaascn of t icsl`setbacks DCA91-02 P.C.7=10 SI TVPCA 91-02 VPCA 91-02 ESPA 91-02A, `1 `�y .Y TABLE 1 Comparison a TYfIcal Sys From SUaetr:For Dembpment Codes,Tana Vista&Victoria Planned Communities.and Ettwanda Specific Platt 2) MHli Dwerin9 GWW Parkwt9 Dwelling Garage Packing Dweling Garage Parking - Unk Lot Unit t Lot Unit Carport Lot l Alalor prt erne Vats(8) 3B 38' 28' 79' 3A' 28' Vctoce(wiwad,fence)(6d7) '22 - 22' 27 (w/o wag,fenca) 37 3r 3z - Etiwankfa(9) SS De msrc Code W SS � � 55 j0 55 55 36 'SecoTana ista(4 5) 25 4 2T 22 4T 2Z 22 1T Vemkia(w/wr '%noe)(637) 2Z 2r (w/o wan,ter-) Etiwanda(9) 4g r Dave mend Code 45 45' 25 45' 4S 25 45 45 25 Coladkx Road Terra Vuta'i,5) 22 - 17' RZ 22' +T' z 22 iT ' Vtctoda(Whval,fer-)(6) "' 22' 29- _ 2Z _ AWL (w/o wad,for") Edwanda(9) 45 r Dc Nd Code 45 45' 28 Local Street Tern V a(4,5) 1V S 7 1S I(y for 10' Vidwia(wWj.fenoe)(8S6) 27 ik7 2Z 10 1G (w/o wad,fera:e) 'i L&anda(10)mentCc& 4Z ' 4r / 4 ` 42 Foowes: 1. Ad setbacks aro given it feel from curb. 2 Assume standards of duster datebpmerd St rA,Di>trip in Tena Vesta&V'rtcda ptunned Communkies. 3. Averages chown are an average seemic uutg`Wonar Herat sandwds.A 37-IM averag.sstbadc is permitted using-SasW standards in t the"W deOg _Hazen. ,r 4. Addlio ai seftdr-requzad for Ouchues of 3-4laios or more. 5. AcK`Inal setbacks T64 iced for Church St M WW Terta Vida Parkway and far sbWurres of 3-stories or more. r" 6. �asions stwvm assume a typical 12'pJAc pwkvray.The width of the pabk parkway does vary under k�rta(n Mdt6xa(17-141. 7, Vudoda Park lane sew are urpqus.The right-011M variM l2d'lW with sucks mesumd from tigt .d way-lop 4ngie'saay,iS two story. The Wicai seback From curb boa is about 7S. 8. AMtionaisosbadanequired for socondstory. 9. *cW satbacks br 5iwanda Avenue and East Avektkm.Development Cods standards are used for other streets. 10,'Dhansio us include a typccaf 12'parkway: TABLE 17.0.040-B BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 71 (N!R a NWt Roq red) VL L LM 9A AH i3 Ltt`YAREA: 22500 B0001, 6000 3AC 3AC 3AC Mlnd�mNatAceragp MINIMUM NET 20000 7200 3000 3AC : 3AG 3AC NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS,(A) Parnitted par acre UP TO 2 'Up To 4 Up To S Up To t 1 Up 40 29 Up To 27 MINIMUM DWELLIMF Nff SIZE:(1) Single Family At ached and 1,000 SQ.FY.(H)Regardiess'Of District Detached Dwelling M}LTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS ) ;. E° FICIENCY/STUDIO 550 SQ.Ff.Ragacdiess Of District ONE SEDROOt1 650 SOFT.Regardless Ot District TWO BEDROOM, B00 SQ.FT.hegarcuess D;Dimot THR OR MORE BEDROOMS (f 950 SO.FL Regar0loss Of District ' LOT DIMENSIONS Agnimum width(0 Required 90 Avg. 55 Avg. 50 Avg. 100 100 100 From Setback) Vary 10 Vary N 5 Vary e!•5 MINIMUM CORNER LOY WIDTH 100 = 70 so, 50 50- 50 'MINIMUM DEPTH 150 000 90— 100. VWR _1- MINIMUM e2ONTAGE 50 40 30 60 FUR NIR (�Fmra Propeny Unn) MINIMUM FLAG LOT FRONTAGE 30 20 20 30 F.yR N/R (o Fros1 Pmperty tine); SMACKS:(a) Fmi t YaM(G,E) 42 Avg. 37 Avg. s 32 Avg. 37 Avg, N/R N!A VARYa+"5 VARY,4•5 VARY+/-5 VARY a/--5 CO NER SIDE YARD 27 27 22 27 - NIR INTERIOR SIDE YARD 10715 5l10 S19 10 PYR NIR N) REAR YAP 30 20 15 10 N/R' -WR AT INTERIOR SITE BOUNDARY 30V3, 20/5 IN15l5 15l5 15r (Dwelling UnivAccessory ug.) (D) (D) (D) DCA.91-02 P.C.7-10-91 TVPCA 91-02 r7 VPCA 91-02 ESPA 91-02A i TABLE 17.08.040-B BASIC DEVELt)PMENT STANDARDS(Continued) l (N!R o Not H qu(red) L L#i A! "H H RF�IDENTIAL BUILDING SEPERATiONS N/R N/R Required PerSectNan HEIGW LIMITATIONS 35 40, i 5a LOT CCYERAGE(maximum�,) 25% 40°k: SO%, 50%0 50% /- 50% OPEN SPACE REQUIRED - Private Open Space 2,000I N 1,000/ 300/160 225/1SO 150/100 1S0/100 (Ground Floor/Upper Story Unit) COktAh W OPEN SPACE(A) (BA!nimum%) N/R N/R NIA 300M 30 3004 USEABLE OPEN SPACE(A) - (Private and Common) 60%, 40°k 35676 35°k 3596 RECREATtOte!AREA/FA(ilL1TY N/R N/R N/R Required Per Section 17.08.040 G LANDSCAPING ( `4 G) (G) (G) Required Per 17.08.040-F AMENff1ES WR N/R N/R Required Per Section 17.08.040-R ,. a Am A.EXCWDSNGLANONECE8SAFyy.FORSECOA'.DAFiYSTREETB ANDARMULSANDINHWOEtAFASW4A6.B.DEPERIDgffCWTM S 'WACmFACTORC TAa4EDasECTCN1724 aoao-s. B. ASNEMMIEDFRCMTMt TWATECURDFACEWFUMJCANOPRNATESIMEMB m:MTOTABLEt7.0®.M-D.R)RAWrrK%.LSETBACK.. C.VARM-ISFAWRYAWSALLOWFDPMVUiANTTosEU W.17DSC14-H. rr D.ADOTEN(10)FEErAaMCERTTOVL,LORLUDeSTRCT. TFPiE OFSE41LK iE0UE3AVFYICGAR4GEDOQ4E.LESSTHANE,MMM(16)FEE F. OPENERS- t. 8 SO {kCPEMMRM(100)FEET LDISTRICTFOR WMTPLE FAMLY DWELUNM *' PERMFETEn LAASSCAPM AM PNiERK)R STREET K ASHr.LEFAUL 'DE7ACHMOWELL o Y r6 EmwsrESPNTR= PLOTAND (10Ms0 Fwr AAYBEAEJT=gEDw"sNA E DLVELL�PitHT ExiiSPTS ARC MECTLgXDESK1dLTf 77MAMPP,MVALOFA L SENK)Acffag(sFAOx=AREE703 nmFwmTmFr.wFw tNT. NI4LUScPERGff. - J.TO SSLWETFtiXSSLAtLERLNSGAHF.N07':CONDE►lfpdTWINAtiVCW AEACRPRQECT.TFEFCLLOWR+dOPEHCENTAGELAirI'ATMMCF THE T04''AL WAGER OFMMSRV.LAPPLY.TENVOPEIVW FOR EFME=Y5i1MAHD MOM FtV r4PEWXM FOR ONE . - B+IDROtrMORUPTOTM7yFMMPERCENBCMWED.SLUMCTTOACMRCWlLSEPowiT.7mPLAr MSCOMMSSIONPA4X AUiUT SfAGRFIRERRATpOFSTCf�gDRWE(() NADEVE �E*S"fJNOVATIYEDESKaM:. OUALn ES APW A BNiNCE YOt CF L"ff.gjPFS A►�pTMS. K NMUSDE AREAS.W-r4 rSSFW1BELi!(rEcTOTHM7y(96)FEETAS�ECF PNSECilOHt72t.070-:D,1 L OIVEXSrDDENSNG RYRANCGAg.PARCHB LESS TFkNTFBiEEMACMMAYCMYBEDRMa'F-DAT7ML*SMENDOFTW . PEALIRTEDDENSfrYRRl1f'E.. J, 0 ,1 r? TABLE 17.08.040-C OPTIONAL DEVlrLOPA9ENT STANDARDS (HER_Not RegWrod) - LM Iti &tH H -'> MINIMUM SITE AREA (Gross)_ SAC SAC SAC SAC SAC LOKREA r -- Variation. . Variatiom,, 1 i\l (Minimum NutAVerage) Required ([). Required - SAC SAC t NUMSEN UP DWELLINff UNITS(A) (Permitted per Acre) Up To 4 Up Tn 8 Up To 14„ Up To 24 Up To 30 i fMINIMUM DW U ING UNI I SIZE:(J) Single Family Attached and Detached Dwelling 1,000 SQ.FT.(G)Regaraass Of District MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS(!Q EFFICIENCYISTUDIO WR 550 SQ.FT.Regardless Of District ONE BEDROOM N/R_ 650 SQ.r f RelQardiese Of District TWO BEDROOM N1R 800SQ.r=i'.Regardless vvistrkt I ;p THREE OR MORE BEDROCK WR 950 SQ.FT.Regardless Of Distrkf LOT DIMENSIONS Minimum wb*h(4P Required Variation (!3' Variation MR N/R FrontSedku*) Required Required , MINIMUM DEPTH Vatiatian Required In WR N1R Single Family Subdivisions SETMME(a) Local Street_ 42 AVG. (0 42 AVM 42 AVG. 47 AVG. VARY+I--S VARY./-5 'VARY+l;�� VARY+/-5 PRIVATE STREET OR DRIVEWAY .32 AVG. 15 AVC S 5 f VARY+/•S VARY+4 f (� (E) (E) {E� CORNER SIDE YARD 17 10 5 N1R N/R (E) (E) (E) INTERIOR SIDE YARD 5,10 (!) 10 N/R N/R (H) (D.H) r`r` AT INTERIOR SITE BOUNDARY 20I5 1SIS 20+5 2015 2015 1 (Dwelling Unit/Accessary Bldg.) (D) ID) (D) TJCA9i-02 E"�`�"BI 1! E rr - �i P.C.7-10-91 TVPCA 91-02 VPCA 91-02 ESPA 91-02k �`' TABLE 17.08.040-C OPTIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS(Continued) I"c Not Required) L LAA m G6H M RESIDENT&TBUILDING SEr ERAT{ONS 25 25 Required Per Section W08.040- OTHER 10 10 Required Per Section 708.640 Q HEIGHT LIMCIATIONS 35 35 35 40 55 j T) (C) (�.) OPEN SEJf1.Ni:-REQUIRED Private Open Space 5.000/N/R 3001160 225/150 15LY100 150/100"' (Ground Ficor/Upper Story Unit) COMMON OPEN SPACE(A) (Minimum%) 5% 10% 35% 35% 35' USEABLE OPEN SPACE(A) ,. (Private and Common) 600/6 4S=ftmuantTo 40% 40 IO RECREATN AREAlFACILFTY N/R Required Section 17.03 040-G LANDSCAPING (F) Required PersuantTo Section 17,08.040-F FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING Required PersuantTo Section 17.08.040•E' ENERGY COYSERVATION N/R Required PersuantTo Section 17.08.040-H AMENITIES N/R NIR Required Fv Section 17.08.040-R A.EXCLUDING LAND NECESSARY FOR SECONDARYSTASEfS AND ARTERIALS AtDINHILWDSAREASSHALL EDEPEWEHiONTHE SLOPFJCAPFCITYFACTOR:CCRTANEDIN SECTION 7MO&I.Ct0-B - e.ASIIEASVWD FROM THE ULTIMATE CURS FACE CN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS.REM TOTALLE17.N.t=-DFCRADDRTIONAL Y SEIBACK l ORMATKNI. - C.LIMIT ONE")STORY WM424 ONE HUNDRED 0W)FEET OFVLORLDISTRSCI FOR IRA.TRR,�,�kyDWEi1&�iG. 't O.:AODTEN(10)FEET AWACENTTO VI.LOR Y DSrRIOf. 1 E LESS THAN EIGHTEEN(10)FEET FROM&=OFSDEWALKNTPMCOW"Nuu.TY ORAPARTMENTREOULRESAW MATIO GARAGE DOOR OPENEIM GARAGE SETBACK ISTIN(10)FEET LEW27 IM FSIM ENW WRAGE ARE USMPERSUANTT'OSECTION1701M.L; 'WITHIN SNGLEFAMILY DETACHEDISEMIDE TACHEDDEVELOPMEMr. - -F.PER%*-MR LANDSCAPING X ADNTERIORSTREETTREES._ - G.A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED MELLING LESS T}{A(y NINEHU%oRWMqscUlAREFEETWLLREQUFiE?HE AFPROVALOFA COPDRgNAL LSE PeEMir PETSUANTTO SECiR3N 77.0aQ30�33�,� H.ZERO LOT LNEDWEUANGSPERLmTEOFERSLLrtfTO SECTION 17Ji&W-O. L REFER TOTASLE.17,&W-C.1ANDTABLE.17=040-C2.. J.SEWORCRIZENSPRCJECTS ARE ID(LVIEDFROMiTHISREQUIREMENT. IL TO ASSURGTHAT SMALLER UNTS ARE NOT CONCENTRATED N AVY ONE AREA ORPRMIECT,T{+.L`•"'�MIND PERCENTAGE LINRATYwS OF THE.TOTAL MR.IER0.=UNITS WIALLAPPLY:TEN(10)PERCENT r1CR:%TICENOY!"Tl W AND 7ki, f(3.5)PERCUIT FOR ONE SEDFIOOMCRUPTOTH6iTYFIVE(3i)PERCFNTWUMW-D-SL18,IEL`TTOAMMONALU.S£PEAAL.,..iMPUUIVRX O MISSIONUkY AUTHORIZE A GREATER RATIO OFEFFICENCYOR ONE(1)BEOROCM# NITS WHEN ADEVELOPMENTEvwrrs INNOVATIVE DESIGN OUALI TES AND A RALANCE MIXOFuNff SIZES AND TYFE3 LNHUSICEAREAS...LE'GHTSSHALL L&"rWYOTHATYPMFEETASSPECFEDMYSECTIOH17.2iAN-0.7. 1 +� ,u _ 0 s F et 0 17 Table . 8.040 - . Q , Building +Se�aI'at1oI1S- and Setback Standards tPr,✓� A s,� 3,,J11 (( DCA 91-02 P 7VPCA 91-02 .C.?-10 91 VPCA 91-02 ESPA 91-02A r n, i 0) C 1 e� Section 17.08:040� 9 Ef"id no, A^rWna Where required to Table 17 08.040-B and C,this section sets forth minimum requirements for building separations and setbacks standards, i J 'J PEI ,17.08.040-®BUILDING SEPARA-hON AND SETBACK STANDARDS GSEPAR/tTONAPit? 7BACK A DISTRICT „' 1Jt MH N BUILDING TO BUILDING Tn-x1tt0Fron1i 20 Feol �.t Other lHatf the Combined Height 15 Feet BUILDING Tp DEllGHED G � CARPORTOR ACCESSORY BUILD)hGSdSTFtUCTURES IS Feet 15 Feet 20 Feet BUILDING TO CURB 15 Feet lS Fest, 20 Feet BUILDING TO CURB AT pROJECt ERiTRY ;' 20 Feet 20 Feat 25 Fen: Notes: (a) Bull"separation and setback shall be measured from the exterior(if building wall ircludinf_eefi enclosed balcmW and/orpatio,enclosed With solid fence/wall exceeding 3 in height.except when the patio wally abut one another,(b) Building shall mean dwelling units. �1 r ,{ dft l ri M WAT 'ro ' lttI'ACa. �� ©TFi1;1�-11�� OW6. M" ti`'tiALr 'TNT GeaMbly tiLtGtiT TO E°P.11t.271h1G �l G PLvrz ISM k?iUl!DlNfa 70 pt;:'i'ALf'�Ll7 Cif i '> DWAY ti - ' 81111..OW6 'i'® 1,77 - OUVED 4 _ PLXG H --Zit &ALONG 70 cum'- AT 4 w r }' erg _ BY ect ®r1 17.08.040 G Recreation Area/Facility G DcA 9I-02 1VPC A 91-02 P.G Z=14 91 VPCA 91-02 ESPA 91-02A r� 1 } j1 .az r`' p Section 17-05,040•G (i atinn t fAUALE GWt«s Whe;e required,in Table 17.08.04i0-C developer Y ^t:Il provide creational amenities in canjunction wish comman-nper;spaci'as, aoilows L' Development c91zsV4ng of 30 r nits or less shall provide 3&?the following recreaticma6 area-sties (a) int� �4f�es fear active use brstdemts forwhom!t is a with rhiIdresa.students,childlc�s couplea,). + um width sbaU be'5cs feet. !ti> Enclosed tot lot with p*equipment. (cj Spey (d) �BBg facility egWpped'with BBg grill.plenle benches and water tap. 2. Development eons stir of-&1 units-lo 100 units shall provide 5 of the following itcreational amea:ries {a) large open lawn area for active use 14,-residents for whom it is Intended(e.9,families with children,stud,ents,childless couples). The mlin m i"lu width shall� 100 feet ` (b) &Multiple erslosed'tot lots with play lrqulpment.The;+ot'lots shots be properly ink comrniently located throiugheut the ke.The number of it#,lots and their location shall be Bute;,t-to City Planner review (c) Poo1 ud spa. { (d) areas far Community mu ti�S room,equipped with kitchen.defined g -tc. (e) BBQ facilities equi pad w ttixnultlple'BBQ grills; iodic benches and water tap.The BB( facilities shall be,prcpdV and canveniently located throuug�hho�ut the site l e number of BBQ facilities and their locatian shall�be subject to City Planner review and approval (f) Court facilities(e.g.tennis,volley bull,basketball.etc). M'4 (g) Jegging/walldng trains with ea se stations. 3, For each 100 units raboca the first iQo.-`.:.wfts,anoihea set of recreational amen IWes as descrrbd in s£ctian 1=7.QS;J4t) G2 steal be provided: 4 z. ` ec recreational amemtiesot listed above may be'�amaldereci subject to C ty Planner nrvlew and apg,u°ral S. Related recreational activities may be grouped toge&Y x and located at any one area of V:e coca mon open syoaca. 8, devppI aleAt' «ecreatonai facilities"3',lirouphout the site shall he Te;aired for op with multiply recreational facilities. 7. All recreation areas or facilities required by this srZition shall be` malrt..aYr..ed by prtM%homeowner's,association or private assessment dfstricta. C { i' 0 i a _ Section; 17.08.&O_R .. R Amenities. To enhance quality of life for multi-family development.' additional amenities shall be reel"-Ki�as follows: l� i. Lockable storage space. Each unit,ahall"be provided with a minimum of 125 cu,ft,of exterior,Iockable stora"t space..The lockable storraag�e space shall be located outside�at the dwellk,and easily accessible by the ,V residents.The design o.thi exterior Ic-.kable storago space shall bej architect integrated e. d/or compO%le to the dwellings.The JI Individual I le storage space units can be located within the enclosed garages designated for that dkening t,riit. 2. Laundry fact-dy. Each unit shall be provided with a washer/dryer to the, interior of the ciA et v Vjhere washers/dryers are noFr ded.conman laundry facilities slili a re aired ata rate of 1 washerper 5 units.Common laundry facilities should be o�nIy distribei`ed ntrally located for all residents within the complex.Conan n laundry facilities can be within free standtng'buildit attached to d';vP� f units or within he recreation coo n''the design of the coiSmon laundry facinue.1 shalt be° architecturally compatible to the dwellings. n: t C� EB11 DCA 91-02 �L a.YPCA 91-02 cj P.C.7-10-91 VPCA 91-02 - -j ESPA 91-02A Z �t ,14 Section 17,08.040-K, « x VlSitor1 For proiec6l)with prtvate streets,or drivew= s,velthin 150 feet of all dwe units.visitor par ui ed be provided instrcet visitor 'Section 3r?Y2.040 shall parking bays. VLsitor parking shall be clearly delineated through pmper rage to the�,sattsfaction of the City Planner. Signage May Include, but is':not limited to:individually label each parking stalls with the wards"visitor parkintt"on the pavement surface,free standw— sign.designating'the�stalls as visitor, visitors to tha visitor parking'area. parking. .anti directoiy signs guiding._. l BI t 1/ „ i DCA 9Y-o2 TViaC'.A 51-m P,C.7-IG 91ti- VWA 91-0Z �r ESPA.Bi-M; — / II is ? FJCfflBIT Se'eti®n 17.08'.050 Absol ate P®IicyeD c Mh91=02 P.C.9-10-91 Ank 7VPC1:91-02 VPCA 91-02 T aPA 91-02a J `\ g Section 17.06.050 section 17.08.050 Absolute Policies The Absolute Policies are intended to address the most critical issues associated with residential development. These include assuring neighborhood compatibility,compliance with adopted plans, adequacy of public facilities and services, and protection of the {� environment and public health.. Each project must satisfy all absolute;'polic;es: forp approval can be granted. These policies are used in evaluation of a residential"project as described in Section 17.06.030 of this Title. A. Plans 6 Policies 1. The Project is consistent with the adopted Gen3ral Plan, Land Use Plan, Development Code,and all applicable Specific Plans. 2. The Prcdectis consistent with the adopted Master Plan of Trails., 3. The Project is consistent with the adopted Parks and Recreation Plan. a. The Projectis consistent with the adopted Circulation'Plan. B. Neighborhood Compatibility 1. The Frojectis compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and neightgrhood relative to architectuCal design;,gcale,bulk,density and unit sloe;iderrttiiy and neighborhood character; building orientation and setback;grading;and visual integrity. 2. ` The conflicts that ar?ptvesumed to exist between the proposed development nand surrounding land uses as described in Table 17.08.050-F pertaining to� Land Use Contacts',have been effectively mitigated in the project design. 3. The Project is&4-fgned so that the additional ixraff?s generated does not have significant adverse impact on surrounding development. tr C. Public Facilities& Services 1. The Project includes school facilities or adequate school facilities exist which are or will,be capable of accom modating students generated by this project., Written certification from all affected School Districts is required within ninety(90)days pr'3r to the final map approval,in the=case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all fiiE r residential projects. 2. The Project includes sey'/er and water facilities or'adequate facilities exist which are or will be available to serve the project. Written certification from the affected sewer and water district required within ninety(90) days prior to Final 'map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits id the case of all other' residential.projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Hater Control Board and the City,' 'written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information,shall be obtained and submitted to the City. " Section 17.08.050 . l 3. The Project includes-street improvements and--will generate traffic volumes resuiting in a service level equal to or above level D (defined as a 85-95 erce p nt volune to capacity ratio by the D KS traff,c study). 4. The Project provides adequate access fore m�zrgency vehicles. 5. The Project provides storm drains, master planned drainage facilities or special drainage facilities necessary to adequately dispose of surface,water runoff or alleviate grading constraints. 6. The Project provides for a Homeowner's Association, and/or Maintenance ' Districtto ensure both on-site and off-site maintenance., 7. The Project conforms to the access'control policies of the. General Plan ;,regarding arterials. 8. The Project provides local feeder trials and com munity trails as required by the GeneF;al Plan. x.;D. P'�blic Flealth & Safety 1. The Project lies within,or partially within,an adopted"Special Studies.Zone"; a geologic report has been submitted which locates the,presence or absence of actual fault;traces in accordance,with theprovisions of the Aiquist-Pricia Act, and special engineering precautions have beentaken to overcome these limitations or these as :is havc,been set aside from development. ; 2. The Project lies within arias subject to geologic hazards(i.e.,slopes greater than 40%, slope instability, soil erosion, ground failure),,as identified in Figures V-1 and V-3 of the General Plan; an adequate geologic of soils?- engineering investigation has been _submitted, and special engineering precautions have been taken to overcome those limitations orr these areas have been set aside from development.' 11 3. The Project lies within./a/yeas of TWunga-Delhi soil association which may have soil bearing capahfiitles that could limit development, as identified in Figure,V-2 of the",Ge!ieral Plan, an adequate soils engineering investigation has been .submitted which indicates the soils can adequately Isupoort the weight of th"e structure. !:, G 4. The Project is not on public sewers and lies within areas of Fria �e condido and Ramona/Arlington.soii astiociations which may not be suitablefor on-site wastewater disposal, as identified in Figure V-2 of the-G.en%ral Plan, an adequate site specific investigation has been submitted-&,4i demonstrates the soile. are suitable.`and the disposal of waste water will not degrade the subsurface water quality. S. The Project is located within a flood hazard area, as identified in Figure V-5 of the General Plan,and special construction feature.,have been incorporaVtd ; into the design of structures. -87- section 17.08.050 6. The Project is located wIthm.),`a fir--.hazard area,as identified in Figure V-6 of the General Plan; a progra6��r interim fuel management has`been included eft to reduce the risk of fire, and firermitigatin measures(e.g., fire resistant building materials, site design whi& enhances fire,accessi,etc.),have been incorporated into the project design per the requirements oi't-�s roothiil Fire protection District. 7. All projects shall be within a seven(7) minute response time from a fire protection facility.f,I€ the prodect:is not within that-�?esponse time, then ,:provisions must be made with the Foothill' Fire Protection District for adequate firs.protection. E. Resource.Protection 1s 1. The Proj.ct contains landforms of citywide s�mficance Me.,foothills defined as,.havifq) slopes 'greater than;10%, and Red Hill) and the project has been designed to minimize alteration of the landform through proper site planning, clustering,and following natural contours. 2. The Project is lC.ated. within a ma;or groundwater recharge area, as' , identified in Figure IV-2 of the General Flan, an$,ttevelopmeni'has been clustered to promote infiltration and to'maintaln open space. l\ 0 3. "She Project contains streamside woodland, associations, identified ar, a significant natural resource in; Figure IY-2`of the General Plan, and site investjgations have iiecn completed, and mitigation"measures proposed _ (Including clustering)to mitigate impacts upon riparian community. 4. She Project islocated on a site or contains a structure or other feature which Jr is designated as a histr,ric landmark, and provision has been made for preservation iz said landmark in accordance with the Historic Pressrvation Ordinance. 11 5. The Project site is designated by the General Plan as Hillside Residential,or is a hillside condition(defined as having natural slopes 8 percent or greater), and environmental studies have-,been conducted to determine land holding fi capacity and site developmeiit constraints, and the proposed density is no gre4�te".than two units par net buildable acre : 6. the Project site is designated by the General Plan as Open Space, and development has been concentratedto preserve open space,and,the proposed density is no greater than an average density of one.unit per 40 acres. 7. The Project promotes ener9yc effic ancy through the'use=of energy efficient building design (e.g., south j facing windows, energy ;Deserving building materials and appliances,etc.)and site planning(e.g.,east-west aligned units,' landsrapina for solar access,etc.). 8. The, Project contains trees-pri t�ected'by the`Rancho Cucamonga Municipal { Code th'ac are;-worthy;of piii ervatiorr, an application for a tree removal permit and report have been;submitted and heal* trees are preserved { through proper site planning and grading techniques. I` r -88- j�7 u Section 17.09:050 F. Land Use Con,wits The matrix in Table 17.08.090-Findicates the conflicts that are presumed to exist betweem jand uses. The types of mitigation, measures listed in tine following sections are the design tools that should be employed either sepa�itely or in %,ombination to mitigate existing or potential lan&use conflicts, The Absolute Policies require thatsuch conflicts be effectively mitigated in the project design. 1. Land Use Conflict Ritigation Measures (a) Open Space Setbacks. 0y providing an open space buffer between o con is ng. an uses conflicts can often be`,,,,oided. The width of the buffer required will depend on the onfliweand the extent of landscaping. To work effective;y,the ast,4�Mship,use,and. Maintenance of the open space buffer mustbe clearly defined. (b) Landscaping acid Topsgraphic 'changes. As part of an`open space u er or area rea men otiancilmmediatelyaojactnttobufldingt, landscaping can be usedto reduce conflicts. (c) Den94 se plantings of evergreens can provide a isU`a1 buffer. (1) Sensitive landscaping can soften the ship visual contrast betwei n two abutting land uses by subdui%g the differences in architecture and bulk and by providing a gradual transition rather than a harsh;edge between uses. (Z)F` Dense growth of plants can be visually appealing-but also can be used to discourage unwanted and unsafe pedestrian or bicycle access between land uses. (3) Landscaping can be used in Tombination with. other mitigation measuQ,,s, such as reducing the width of oven space buffer required and soften'the visual conflict created by safety and security fences. (4) gecontouring of the land can alter views, subdue sounds, reduce glare, change the sense of praimity, and channel pedestrian travel. (d) Orientation. The strict spatial proximity between land uses and the apparent or functional proximity can be very different depending on . the orientation of buildings and activities in the two land uses. (1) Tr',,buildings themselves can cause a buffer to be created. } 'ffectively turning their backs on each other -- hing views, access and principal activities away from 4'A--wie'other la:;,d use. Care must be taken, however, that a hazardous.and unaesthetic "no-mans"land is not created in I the process.. LN ; (2) Alternately, the intervening space can be eliminated altog.therif the two b4dings share a.com mon back wall. �3 section 17.08.050 1 (3) An entire site plan shi-7,) be oriented so that the activities and functions are alfi led hierarchically -- placing those` least compatible furth\,t from the common boundary between land uses an&ir qse most compatible near that boundary(i.e.,single story ate= ent to single story). { (e) Barriers and AlWation. It,may be appropriate and necessary to use- p ssca a ers prevent'the updesirab,z attributes Pf one land use from affecting the people and activities in the adjacent land use. (1) Fences, wails and berms can prevent the passage of people into areas that would be unsafeor insecure` 61, (2) Light and noise`can-also be mitigated through physical barriers r> .,h as fences, ---,walls, berms, screens and landscaping. (f) Architertural Compatibility. In addition to the, architectural consi$era ons -invo ve n mitigation through orientation, the I architectural design of buildings can"reduce conflict and promote co m patibiiity. (1} Materials, colors, scale and prominence of buildings in ca adjacent land uses n coor�iina`ted so thare is a gradual transition from one lancruse to another rather than sharp and displeasing contrast. 'Purely aesthetic details that are "tacked" onto a building to cover up land use conflicts, I however,WIR cave,more harm than good, i�� (2) The architectural coo, atibility shoulii rise from a total consideration of the r.Gnct)on of each land use,'and,.the _ func=parkii'qareas ace16etween them._ (9) Circulation. cao often serve to red.ce ce In pes of land use conflicts: Separatdon of conflicting us with a street or parking area can proyide�buffer. r { Amok 5_! F -90- Ftir}r SectioFn 17.08.050 TABLE 17.08.050-F-LAND USE CONFLICTS l _ _ This 'Aid.�R itiRiy nsys.anon thiscwtllcti .m Land Use C:or�fl icts� to arise 'Mtwen LanA.Uses. i", . 7 m1e wss ee River is+ay,va Types Of Conflicts. LaCi^a �'• i o _ pt iadow v ' aesthetics" Active Recreation �.� c Q C a) a)IX access i w G?;�asit ` o Low, a a ~; safety 's Mot�eraie c �e"sty g o High ensity o N InsfquTlIJaai .. c 1. - ♦ �, ,$' N .� � 7 1/� eTJ U Office/business o E r'r ` s. o m Comerci0l O U Industrial ' Roaroad a Porkina Lots Airport and c Ffighc patterns Coiiectar street _. S ' Arterial .,#rt-et ..� a r�> EXHIBIT " g Suction. 17:05.099, Design Guidelines DCA 91-02 P.C.7-10-91 TVPCA 91-02 VPCA 91-M ESPA 91-OSA ID r Section 17.08,090 J. Air Quality. No operation or activityy shall cause the emission of any smoke;fly asff, pst, umPs, vapors, gases or other forms of air pollution which can cause damage to hea'4, animals, vegetation, or other forms of property, or which can cause excessive soiling on any other lot No emissionshall be permitted`ihich exceeds the requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District or the requirements of any Air Quality" Plan adopte by the City of Rancho C ucamonga. K. Fire and Explosion Hazards. An operation or activity involving the storage of r amma a or explosive mazer als shall be,provided with adequate safety devices against the hazard of fire and explosion and adequate -fire-fighting anc!afire suppr z-sian equipment and devices in accordance with the requirements of the Foothill Fire District Uniform,Building Code, and Uniform Fire Code. BurF.ng of waste materialsia open fire is prohibited at any point L. Fissionable or Radioactive Materials. No operation or activities shall be permittea which result at any rime in ere ease or emission of any fissionable or radioactive materials into the atmosphere,the ground,or sewerage systems. M. Liquid or Solid Waste. No operaon or action shall discharge at any point inte-inyPUDIIC street, public—sewer, privat��sewage disposal system,stream,body of t ;ter or into the grojnd, of any materials of such nature or temperature as ;can contaminate any water supply,`,tei ere with bacterial processes in 'sewage treatment, or,otherwise cause the=�,ission of dand&ous or offensive elements, except in accord with standarris approved by tyre California Department of Public' Health or such other govern mer tal agency,;as shall have jurisdiction. Section 17.08.090 General Oedgn Guid tines A. Intent. The intent of the guidelines is to i�4sist the developer in understanding and com7p yang with the City's standardsfor building and site design. The guidelines,are based upon com m unity design goals as expressed in the Gzr.erei Plan,and encoura4e the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property along with associated facilities, such as signs,landscaping, parking areas, and streets. The guidelines establish a high standard fear design quality but are flexible enough to allow individual expression and imaginative solutions. B. Applicability.-The provisions of ttris section shall apply to all development within all—resi en al districts,`-unless otherwise specified herein. Any addition, remodeling, relocation or constuction,,requiring a btnlding permit within any residential district subject to Development/Design Review pursuant to Chapter 17.96 shall adhere to these gguidelines where applicable. C., Site Plan Design 1. Existing Site Conditions..;-Natural features should be used ti an advairm a as design a emen ; suc,7 as, mature vegetation, landforms, drainage courses, grading, rock outcroppings and views. Conversely, undesirable site features can be minimized through proper site planOng and building orientation. 2. Binlding Orientation. Placement of the buildings shall be done in a manner .a compatible wt>Fi surrounding existing and planned uses and buildings. The setback from streets and adjacent properties should relate to the scale of the proposed building. Larger buildings require more setback area fora balance Section 17.03.090 of scale and compabbility with,adjacent uses. Buildings should be.oriented. along a north-south axis, as"much as possible, to 'encourage�a4ewligy conservation. For multi-family development, attached dwellings should be provided with reYef and a sense of variety. This could be achieved by staggering the units The placement of-buildings should date tWbW.4 another, and cr+eat�a varietal of view,orientation forincreast d interest and openness. This could be achieved by skewing or angling the buildings. Buildings should be cluster around common facilities 3. Access/Circulation. The access and circulation should be designed to provide a sa k=aa a -Uht system for'vehicles and.-pedestrians Points of access shall comply with L-Ity access regulations and.Shall not conflict with other all but titlanned r smallest residepoi��"Two i hints of access shall be provided for h ntial develcpments. The circulation system should be designed to,reduce conflicts 5etween vehicular sand pedestrian traffic, minimize impacts on adjarent,prop 2rtles,combine access where�'ossible,and provide adequate m.aneuver°ag ar-as. Curvilinear streets are encouraged whenever possible. Vetficular and podesstrian traffic s4all be separated,to the extent_possible, through the use of a continuous syste'in of public and private sidewalks _ 4c _Nrting Areas. Pa�ing areas should be designed to minimize visual -aisruption of the ovWhl prgiect design." Pariring areas shout be screened from streetsthn?ugh co�,`binat,,;ons of maur�ding,landscaping,-lows profile walls and grade sepa_ ,t 66&.-::,T, a design of parking areasshould also minimize auto noise; glare, and increazes in .a iferrt air teAperature< This can be accom'plished,-through,sound walls, erring with fencesorhedges,trees,and separation of parking spacC�s and driveways from residences. (a) Site Design Openness, reducedrtrv'>,UrL, mass and convenience of" use should be characteristdcs of pat-'Q,ag area design as implemented by the following: ��. o " _Parking areas(open' rid covereAj&) 41 be.designid'to provide parking spaces conven!Ttly 'located to-'the units they are intended to serve. o long, unbroken limas of,, 'osing garagr<sicarports on each side of a dove aisle shoOd be avoided, r phis type of design results in a car-stricted 4T. atmc�phere. t. Free standing garages,/carports should be loca+ed not to disrupt the primary view of residential siaciurew 3 Views to landscaped areas should be maintained at the ends of �d�lrive aisles. Vistas should not be obscured by facing,^,arages i l r carports, r o r' -Planter breaks and spo lal lsaving should be included along the a pari�!ng aislesF.These features cdd interesting patterns to the. 1 driveway/pat.a�ay area►hythm; s p� 6 el _ J 1 y ., \ > ;l f Section,17.08.O9O o ° In order to open Up more of ;..'parking area o adjacent r landscaped areas and reduce the"alley"effect along the drive aisle, -offset-fscing garages/carports are encouraO, on , engthy_drive aisles. (hi Architecture: Garage and carport strut-cures should exhibit designs' which are compatible,,supportive and ;ally integgrated into the overall architectural there S"Implem:nttid through the following prwsions: y� ;; fl Long struc are.s present' difficulties in steeping proportiors appropriate;, with 16) nriuinal design -In*,. on the main structures, and therefore, 0e :garage/c&port structures should be limited to 642-cars.`, o Recognize garage'doors.a's an elemPht of design,rhvthm and use to create varying p«tterns. Ex%ensive use of single width 0-age doors sh-(Ad be avoided...The perception of increased. detrsity can resul 'rrom a parking arevwith iapge wmbers'of' garage doors,, An overly repetitiotis pattarn or doors,can be monotonous and should beJavoid t4 > o "Flimsy`; r�`,tick like" carport designs which portray an add=\ ospemacent_perceptn aot& b %haracteristicson,n of a par1king area. Substantial aesign elements should be integrated inin tht structure to convey a more permanent concept,for the carports - o Storage units"should be designed'-es an integral part of the carportstructu iv. a Within muNdple space garage x cctureS the walls�etweeri the units shall be solid except trap°ar more spaces are designated,to a single dweilid��JnfL` For single garage units, . : the inside dimension s4all,beii�creased to mini�um of 10 x 20 feet f,)r convenience of use. S. Landscaping/Open Space, Landscaping and,open spaces must be designed as an edesigt n.eg t ndenhance tie building design,enhance � public views and spaces an:i provide;buffers and tmnsitions where needed, with emphasis- on complemerr4ing '9y a a ng and softening slope .banks. Landscaping must provide for solar access and'shad'e to facxiitate energy conserrratfon. Open space should be provided i? eoneefitr�ited areas large enough to provide'oppoituni ties for active uses by;Iroups. 6. Fencing/Sc►e_ening. rences acid walls are discoureged unless needed for a specs c screening or safety purposd, Where they are needet:..color, mateAal,s and variation of the vertical and horizontal.planes,are,nesued to blend with r the :site and building design.- The use of any fencing or walls should be } consistent Oth the ov I'l design theme. c -40 Q- rl � ( ` 7 - 1 Ct a.i ` Sectibn 17.08.09U 'y 42 t I Ltghting. Adequate on-site lightina,',should bP provide,__to`'assure environment while at the same time not, c�d�eamas,of int-n se,lighteor glare. F ztures and poles stall 6e design@d a.ld¢laced in'a manner'consistertt end compatible with the.overall site and btnlding design character. 8. Utihtias and Ancillary Equipment: On-site utilities;and equipm�'nt shall beer oca In inconspicuous areas, away from public view, Whe&they a6'e � located in public;view,they shall be.screened with;a combination of,material � that best suits the ov gall;design theme. 9 Gra,'ng. Developmentshould relate to the;naturaLsurroundings and minimize grf'iiing by following the natural rontours as much-as possible. Graded slopes sP auld be rounded'and •contour6d to blend with,:.the existing terrain. `Split- 1 vel pads,-lamlt u foundations,stepped footings;etc.,can be used in areas of.moderate to',steep gradient.' Above all, grading shall be designed to coffrp!Nmerit the projects orientation, scale, height, design and transitions 'kith surruu�dine areas... , ',7 ,10. Firs Safety, Development should be .designed in.Jaccordare a with. Fire �'7s `c�rFqu�remen for two points of Ga£e ,ndr`teadw'zccess., Are-as' ') designates as ir��h fire hazard areas should minimize fu biii ,) around residence:2i:raugri gne2nbelts or cu3tiva�wd fuel hrak�. t it Transition <af Denstty. :j The sits'plan. should s�std compatibility with surrou c•ng ne�g a cod through prnvicting proper L`rat!sitiol� 'Jf, density, particularly ble densities, open :bate buffer z as,increaser) setbacks Ind'arshitectural compatibil t: !� are encouraged along common boundaries +::),provlde proper transition:of, density."Vustering"units cas ryzovide 1,rgy-„pEiifspace areas as a 40fer. " 12., Street D�'es gn., Vary street � � �� pa"t'carn fro redejoe streetscape monotony. •"� urvs linear�%ets,. to cul-dt.=sacs, front yard landscaping, and singl!;--locaed streets, are rmcouray�d pro vide streetscape variety .1nel-4 sual interest; particularly in the LOW.-Medium District 13. House Plotting. Clustering houses around comva ,`pace, zero lot tine, reverse p n ng,angling house to thestreet,and aids z�; y aTpa3es m�y'be permitted if they provide s.,treetscape variety and visual'in# r,: ;;:particularly in the i.ow-Medium_District. a. 301ding 0esigt, 1. Design Theme A;-recognizable`design theme s.�at1''be established winch is com�pa a whit surrounding planned,or exist9un,developm'6rt*�.jnd should be T� based,upon,prominent design features in ;:aammed+ate`!�area ve.g., treys, landf6rms, historic landmarks). :'4ubtle variaVods 'are,-mediate wWh provide visual int6rest but do ac-; tZta ab4ot O.anges causing discord in the - overall character"of the im ineG;-,ce_fiajgh It itr,&tt intended that one style of architectum.should be indiYidual structures shall create and_enh4pc6`a high quality'a� �"rns�nity appearance. I05- ,��f Section 17.08."o x� D 2. Architecture. The architecture should consider coiygaf bility -.W1. surrounding character, including harmonious building style,-form, size;calo*, G muter isl and'raof line`: lrtdicidual dwelling units should be distinguishably from one another and have separate entrances. Shadow patterns created by ;r ;&rciiitectural elements"such a:,;overhangs, projection or recession of stories_ , balconies; re!!Q.% and avmings contoibute to tiUilding's character whil: aiding in climatef contrlr;7 urther,changes in the roof leve2'or planes provide ,? arcfiitec*ura?, ` lest. In psrticuler,�`2iow U.-Mium density and mutti4a.ii1y residxntirai 64 opment should be dei� kou 7W tt+*j, ndeci architecture .f Cdt through"increased,delineation�'-.of, surfac`a`treatment and architectural o detaus., `rhe ar`et:ii cturai concilt'should;,also c3mplement,tile grading,and topography of wh`e site. W= Scale. The mass aO scale of the building should be propC. tionate to the iL I. IJI open spscss, streeti loceions ane:urrounriing devetapments. Setbacks end overall heights should g;avide an element of openness and huma:i scale. Multi le'famil C`p y product type (i:e.,.apartment, condominium, townlia�ise) is discouraged iniin mutely;ad:Ncent to lower ciuisity single family areas. All�1>'I attanhed project"§:adjacent,"to 4.irist_mg one-story single family developments shad to•one story,unless tr,e t ;;act of tteo-S.bry sauetures'rin the existing . n onestory neighborhood is/fully`mitigat d iv' h 6;`46sis on•privacy, views, and gen dal eoinpatibility'4 13ei?1dr s mpE� e!wrizontsl;as wen,,as " vertical apgraran stiffs aoitld"Ind'aehiev(d tJy :he use o€ projee4ic�s or recessions of stories,brilcanie!�,,wWows anal Acores,I-Vid changes i m'!if levels. rxn planes. 'cular for sau2tiple fem;ig Vol duct type,btuld ngs over s. stories shall step bacl ; 4. Materials 'C`anzolors. Golors�_Itextures and materials shell be coordinated to gn achieve total coinpiltibility .i eA.- , The materials find oloi�e3:ssen shauYd comp,3-mpat tha building ehdiact,-X! Q � ^M ; �� ti 5. Signing. Every bieiiding`'shaL_;ba designed with a pree se eoncept,for adequgte'' signing. >lruvisir n,for sign Placement;§ scale in ralatioiiship with buiidin r and readab�ity.3hall be considered in dw*16,ing the:igmiig ecncept While providing,thz r1iost'eff ective_si,ning, it shall also be 2iighly egmpatible iwith the building anti site design r�;ative to color.-material and ptace�t'ientr Eaui�mert Sep eniTI Any equipmen,� whether on'ih&roof,side of";ulding, or;'.ground, shei be 's'ereened _v The method of;screening all be architecturally compatible in terms of material, colon"shape,and size.'-'T' he sc eening design shall"blend with the building design. Where kidiv'idual eyuipmant is provided,e_continuous screen is de.sirabl::. e n r 7 .', 10&- K.I 7 C) EMBIT 7 L V SIJPPLEMENTAL: QUE,STIOr'I1TNd` RCI .1 DCA 91-92' a31 1 7VPCA 91-02 i 7PCA 91-02 ` f ESFA 91-02A 5 r 1r° r 1 i t� CITY OF RMCHO CUCAMOkGA / SUPPLEMMTALAPMCATION FAR ItESIDENTIAi.D iTiS.oPl1dLN9C T AD new restdenttai devet&ment are subject to the Elraluation'as described in Section 17.Cn0.OS0. easeept for the f 11c: g• �aeral. a Nc-residential development 4"units or less ^� IN New residential subdivision 4 lots or less i Individual single family construt,Uon r _ Others as determined%r the City Planner S Pacp®se :Tile intent of the Supplemental Residential Ev2luation is to�'nsure that the..development will meet and satisfv the City's goals;and abjectly-s This review Is based upon community objecttvts'expressbd in the'GeneralTlan. Criteria used;in the evaluation of a residential projerl'f and in conjunction with the TievelopmentlDeT n Revtgw ¢onsideratio`-a ar11 e d0acri d to Section 17.060.030 . i7 These Ntilerta are Tested a `'foi4aw�s: �) Absolute Policke-Section 17.OS,050 IN Development Standards-SeektCL 17.08.040 a,, Design Guidelines-Section 3.7.OS.O90:, C A ticdtien pruoed=C The-submittal'nf the Suppglemental Questionnaire is., required or residential development.The Application sh ba submitted to the City Planner for evaluation,on the completeness and :accuracies of the tnt'ormation submitted.The City Pla+leer shall determine if the psvject complies!th each of the Absolute Policies and,Design, Guidelines prie€,scheduling the project fo,Planning ;- Commission consideration. ' S 311 /n, , `' II Supplementai gtwtionuaire �} L At&a6wkt4eM=t of the Citrg re41 f% I. tha'Applicant. r :, ( Nalco; t,- ,, � (Eitm's representing the veQaiop�, prnperty`;weer and members 'the'professional ftam ari;amiliar with all the�,�erttnent Codes,Laws.Ordinances, Policies etc..thst spply to the development of des proposed pMject. -l ,Check the il,'!Cumants that a�to the project O� �,�DeveTo went C1ode O Gen& Plan t ii p 1:tiwaiic a Specific Plan O Terra;W-td Plmnt d�Comtuutiity. �t Footkailt HivcI Specific Plant,CI Vieta?ia"Pianned.Community other, Plead a specify ,1 ,[ S4nature• ff 1- tt r.; �•, c -�� ji t 1 l n 2 �Sgagte 1Rlieiec.These are"absolute rta+uirements each project must satL* before approval can be granted"I The Absolute po�;cies have been developed in , response to the most critical Issues assaciateci with resider_iial development. These In' assu*ing neighborhood eompatibiltty, comp ance with Qldopted plaas, adequa , t-"public faC21ties and services, and'protectio3 of the-piiblir envimmrfe.lt and pu�c health.These Absolute Dolicies are contained in Section 17.080.050 ;t Describe .'in written foams,illustrated graphics or a c-i—ifibination of both .hos{.r this graposed project has been designed to meet`each of the criteria as stated in Section 17.063.050. (Attached additional sheets as necessa�r� rT 3t IUovelo men# �taA rd Ti ese'are the d—elopl;'erit standa a-s- dealing wtith, minimum requirements.for setback,lot area,biding-he4pit, open space. etc.The spec development standards which a ro�9e�esst sa are dependn.nt upon the base development district . These standards are contain in Section 17.08.040 of the Development Code. Projects within Sp"- Me Plans and Planned.,Communities areas mmunitypstiafy the develop den* standards coL�.ain in that SpeeIficq lam and Describe in written form, illustrated Qmphics,or a comb8natiou of bot1 ,how this Project has been pesigned to meet and exceed the minimum requirements of the development standard6.( AtAtt-c—hed additional sheets as necessaty �f rr 1, T6 ellne8. ,Paid .are based tapon,comaaunit) design goals as r„ � expressed 83 the General Flan and encourage the orderly and,,harmon"_ous a pearance of Structures aud'ptaperty ineludir neighborhood compatibilit site P �^.g. arcili'echug and laird:ca'er The gui elineii are intw.nded to be f(e.,dble enough to allow individual expression and innovau(sn n ithin Aa ,:amevvae of an established high standard i 3r design quality.The design f uideiites.are contained in 08( Section 17. ©90. ;w Describe in written foim. illustrated graphics or a cembinatioa-of,both,h6w,this Project has been designed to meet each of the design,�uidrlines, � �f i� e 4 v r A g y�'pgv�a a 'NUE I tt tt "DRAFr,CHAMER OF RESIGN-GUIDEBOOK AU j d J L � Il P.C.740-91 1 TVPCA •02 VPM 91.02 FSPA 91-02A _J `Y , omn* es goes O General Design principles t1 e c-amunity's c j=mlons for developmenvare Influenced by a strong desire for"qua,.ity ;fl ?; design, 7be principles which influence this direction for developments are as follows; 1=04stive design, ;regardless of its style,:in move imponazt��to the achievement of . "quality"than,?ie use of any predetermined thence. Innovative,deMgn promotes the use of novel variations.to solve commoci and unique problems in urban development... Iiish,quality is the Msult of extensive consideration in providing inno Ve and apPropriate solutions to all aspects of the Developments should be desmgnecl to serve the community's and visitors and 4: reflect the come iunity's:.esthetic values.- Designers are expected to recognize and work in con6 t with community goats as. well'v addressing requests of their clients. " I3,>Agneas should not view their protects"singly,bit as apart of a larger mast Ian area in�,'Jvnich they are responsible for design continuity and compatibility. '7 �r - 3tant".3sdized alss;an solution,"off tlin shelf'model buildings which may be accepted " elsewhcm.,are not itecessarii Y the acceptaltivmeasurc of quality design rr•"itlts cottmiurilt7. - AcknowledZe the positive aspects of nearby existing buildings ray c,0mporatirtg compatiblt�fN'.airit ,in the new develo&xatL _, IT " "360°"design cctineept is expxtedl in tell site and mhitecriral pla*';,ii.9 In this concept,tall stiles tad portions of a des-IM art expected to i ve the attention tv detail and interest.in design formulae an. (CP'Pg•IIl-75) 1lmese general principles are the c�*mn�nuv 1. espectatiors anti a�ssumFtions in rile nwiew of develop xneatprtrposalsastd should L+eincurpo�itedinto the individualdesigneWformulationofdesignsaa,dons ) -6 ` f i I ( }+ 4 �.� ( 1 ; t Site , Land.se6)�e besign- C! A. Structures(residential)should be sled to ietain outward views froni each uri � " (GP pg.III-100) 1. Buildings,in multi-famit, projects to b skewed i t relationship to each other to create n ranety of view orientation for increased visual inierest. (GP pgs 1&-103),, r__.` r r -preferable- f c ; -less preferable- f - _G, o B. Varilition of dwelling desi�7 1.Staggered units 1` preferable 1 -less preferable- f Amok v } � 0 2 .`c linter I3liiits =- _ a.;Variadon in floor Plan arrangement ;' e'`bb �. 1-17 / G i.t do Lr. -Preferable- ell lay! referable r;, b.VsriatioR in the Number of iuuts clustered togeth r, c f �,. C 4 J -lessF refmble- ,. f r ,. C. Variciionin uxut3 arrangements . Aw " IP AML V} r ?,, r_ ` v -gre£srable- ) �� .rn l x j 7 les pitImable Ilk x r 07'017 02 19`9 P, C, AG DA 3 :Va#f-Eon in Building Arrangement. '•r 1 .,. /1 LL— r , preferable- C �y 1`l less;preferable- ,� Products must be flexible in interior arc constrnc-on.design to accommodate these design criteria , C,Driveways i3 multi-family projects would bs treated with streetscape, " curvilinear lanes and°street,side"landscaping r prefecablc- n s� -less preferable t �-} Ly ----------------------- e77,7 r ja u t7 IZ `ri ? /`f , ..+fir.<'.s'. ,L�n� �";.0�' �� -;1 •�,a�¢a. .� ,��3 .:-�.X 2�,:_,�,,,. � �^�.��,': += A Y� � '11 i EMU +` 3 t t - 7 I t; .J `"-- his�{4 , •s; i M ♦ rA B. Change in roof level orpla:aes provide architectural interest. Aftk (BC 17.08.090U.2) Ip to be avoided: roof shapes complicated and indiscriminately mined creates rest- less,chaotic appearance.(MM) U I G I less preferable: all roofs simple and uniform provide quiet out iue,but tending toward monotony if number of unfits is very large.(MM) (D Preferable: groups articulated by distinct shapes can achieve unity with variety. (1l MA) r. r O O. Orient buildings around common facility preferable- Aft 'I I L--jL 1 -less preferable 'RESOLUTION No. 88-161A" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOklyi, AMENDING THE ESTABLISHED POLIC=S:REGARDING LANDSCAPE AhD 1RRIGATION DRAWINGS E N WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, on August 10,, 1988, cadeptea ResOlution No. 88-161 establishing certain policies regarding-landscape and irrigation drawings to implement the'City's 90?3S' and objectives. WHEREAS, the Planning Commissicn determined that there is a need to add a policy to ensure t1la quality of the landscape materials. it NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga doesteiereby amend their policy to read: The develope2, is responsible for the proper installation and cOmpletion of all required landscaping. 2. The 'developer,shall submit landscape and irrigation plan4'\for review' and approval ,to the Planning Division. in. a manner prescribed by .the City Planner. Said plans shall be prepared by a`registered :;Landscape Architect whose stamp shalt be conspicuously affixed to said plans. 3• The developer ' shall retain the services of a registered Landscape Architect to provide inspection of the installation of:the landscape and irrigation system. It shall be the Landscape Architect's' responsibility to inspect or direct the inspection of the installation of plants, materials, and irrigation systems in compliance with the approved plans and with City Standards requirements and Conditions of Approval. 4. The developer's Landscape .Architect shall inspect and certify -� the quality and health of the landscape materials. Such certification shall be submitted for City Planner review; and ap'''. oval landscape materials. prior to installation of he " ; 9. The developer's Landscape Architect shall notify the Planning Division immediately a n"the in stallation nstallatio u of any material or equipment other than shown on the approved plans.. All changes are subject to approval by the Planning Division. I 6. Upon completion of the/,project, the developer's Landscape Architect shall suLuc:a written report-.to the Planning Division including: a. A 'certification in a form prescribed by the City Planner that the work was completed in accordance with the approved plans and with City standards, except as listed in'(b) below. DCA 91-02 3 7 VPCA 91-02 P.C.7-10-91 VPCA 91-02CD kSPA 91-M I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Nai. 88-161A Jf ;r DCA. 91-02.-`CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '♦ - ,_ July 10, 199 ` Page 2 b. A listing,,of` any deviations from the appnoped plans or from- City standards'and the date of approval and by whom, in the rlanning Division,, approval was granted for said deviation. C. An "as built" set of, landscape;.and irrigation plans. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE,"1991. f PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY"OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. t� BY: Lar T. McWi \Larry tl, Chsirman , ATTEST: $ i Brad Buller, Secretary. I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commissi0x� of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foYgaing Z:e"solution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted Y' ::he Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting OZ i:he Plannia� Commission held on the 26th day of Tune 1991.., AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS: ^r ABSENT: CCMMISSIONERS: 1eFV �� C� EXI IB] AMENDMENTS TO,TICTORiA PLANNED c� C43M11lAUNIT c,. AMhk w1 DCA 91.02 1VYrn 91-02 P.C.7-10-91 ESPA 91-02A to 10 ;f „ 1 l ,S RESIDENSfAL DEt1ELt3PMENT STANDM OS(continued ) 4. Medium Density Residential("Ni"Land Use Plan Designetion 3': 2y Land designated as Medium Deasi Residential Is intended for residential development that ranges from 8 to 14 dwelling units per adjusted gross acre. The foEovring regulations are applicable for these areas: } a Use Permitted- detached or attached residential dw II3ngs not it n lfdi ed fourteen dwellings per adjusted gross acre,m8uding,but � i 1, a family dwellings-attached or det:.ied-Lncluding,but nomi ted to townhouses,triplexes,fourk ems,,and condomineums. 2. Cluster housing, i t 3. Community facilities.page 241' h Site Development Standards 1. Clusterhousing. (a) Building site area..,3 acres minimum, (b) Building site coverage:As permitted by required setbacks and private open space Building setbacks:See bull (c, ding ding setback dJagranis an the following page for typical setbacks. [d)' Building separation sand setbacks:The standard-from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code shall apply. . (e) Building height:40 feet maxtmum. ' r UJI Building site width and depth�etnz=.ed setbacks. by require d _._ (g).. Private onen space:3110 sq.ft.minimum. LIhIofsition of density:The site p should consider patibiUty with surrounding neighborhood through viding pnr per transition of density.parti_h9arly on skies adjacent to lower densities.Comparablesities.�ce buffer zones,increased setbacks archit comnatZility are encouraged alongmon l:oundaries to'provide proper transition of_sity.Clustering of units can provide large open e arras as a bufferluster housing developpment and muiti-family lopment withla the P=ed Community area must ply with the-Design Guidelines as outlined in the iderYEial Section of"the Rancho Cucamonga elopment Cede. 2 � O u � , (2) Innovative single family housing. (a) Buildlf site area:3.500 sq.ft..minimum,4,000 sq.ft. averF e. (b) Building site eov�rage:As permitted by required setbacks and Private open C ace. (c) Building setbacks:See building setback diagrams on the following page for typical setbacks. (d) Building separation:See Building setback diagrams on _ the following page for typical setbacks. (e) Building height:35 feet maximum- (f) Building site width and depth:As permitted by required setbacks. (g) Private opemspa e:300 sq.ft.minimum. The-:above site development standards apply, to projects which are deemed` innovative.Inn1 ration in single£amity der' opment means providing creative design solutions vvhicY�.laddress the critical conce> s of neighborhood compatibility,density transition,and design gvallty:Innovative pmjscts are c2irsacteri�ect by an attractive streetscape which is mot monotonous, nor is the street scene dominated by asphalt/concrete,garages.and cars.hmovattvc design means finding creative ways to create well-designed space,particularly usable yarn space. �� ,.. /� z r j 224a rll a4 - v a. 7-7 N. lu AOL am fd e tam •� I ` ��� i j � �� j t4L a go H £ tlo ci tt i 1 a `} V W a -<�: u Au o ca e'ta W � .uj e I 42 t- ,j RESIDENZIA.DEVMOPME.K7 STArJDARDS(continued ) 5. Medium High Density Residential(' W land usG'Pian Designation) Land designated as Medium High Density Residential housing is,intended for residential development that ranges from 14 to 24 dweller units per adjusted gross acre.The followingregulations are applicable for these areas: a Use permitted: 1. Multiple-fancily dwellings.including.but not limited to. apartment pro ects.zondominium projects,and cooperative apartment projects. 2. Aceea sory buildings,structures and uses where related and incidental to apermMed use. 3. Community facilities,page 241 h Site Developme it 5taiidards r 1. B>�Jlding site area:3 acres minimum, 2. Building Setbacks:Ste building setback.diagrams on the following,page for typlcal setbacks. 3. Building separation.'and setbacks:The standards from the r4u*-fro Cucamonga Development Code shall apply, 4. Building height:40 fat maximum. Transition d The site.plan should consider compatibility with surrounding density; throughprovidi. =roper transitio of density. jktrtiCtn ors inj111-sites adjacent to er densities p Comisaiab a densities,„open space buffer zones. inemased setbacks and architectural compatibility are,• encouraged along common >' boundaries to rovide proffer transition f density. Clustering of j units can provide large;open spare areas as a buffer.. ✓ d. All cluster housing develvp Amt and multi-family development within_ the Planned.Community,area must comply with the Design Guidelines' as outlined in the Residential Section of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. -- I I I 11 �29 an to M NR cc It FIR 4 spa m na i v yyffi I.1„.. N loo 39 LU a �„ •a T i vs s ¢ � � ► 0 o _ - tom " I . 9 yj'O �t71 "Im 2 0 2 O S .- Y'.� -- C) _ O 8g 3 II3 u+ sR sIIIL IZ b IL 9 �� � `sa �s � s a•�y � CO Nl+j ep '� IJ h RESIDENTIAL DEVELo PMENT STAND.APMS ( continued ) Ji 6, High Density,Raidentialt V R'Land Use Plan Des i�;Aation) hand designated as High Density Residential is intended for residential,` development`that ranges from.'24 to 30 dwelling units per adjusted grass acre.The follovI)ng regulations are applicable for these areas: ' a use Permitted: 1. MuWPle family dwellings '_ncluding,but not limited to "r apartment projects.;:condominium project,, and cooperatives-= apartment projects. , 2. Accessory buildings,structures and uses where re%ded and incidental to a permitted use. �. 3. Community facilities,page 241 h Site Development Standards 1. E sv,'Wdi tg site area:3,acres minimum. 2. Building site coverage:60 46 3. Building setbacks:See building setback diag*ams'on the following page for tvplcal setbacks. 4. Building separation and setbacks The standards from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Cede shall ap Alk 5. Bullding height 59 feet maximum c Transition of density. The site plan sbcivl-t cunsider r_ompatiblllty \" with surroun neighborhood through pr r .'�*►g groper transition of density. pan@c ari3* on inBll sites adjja^ a parer dcnsafdes Comparab a densities, open spa::e buflei "?iris�ased seetaacim and architectural compatibility= are ,.,,=' :_ u�ng eoa3rmori boundaries to rovide proptr'bansWon to ,, jy. Clustering of. units can provide large open spacx:areas as a bi der d Ail cluster housing development and multi deepWcpment within the Planned Comrfiturlty area must comply wi�e Design GuAdelines as outlined in the`Residential'Section of the.Rancho Cucamonga Development.Code. 232 ^ f t: w �: �,fir.' � „�. = T fr •�. � = r, ' Wk ttkk °^ ff IN awns za � O � � �1 LTi is ± j y •?: � Ok'. yog . ' Inflnul 9 pas LU u� H tu d wo .01 In d h ett r Aft M-HBp COMMUNI r rr y rgp(A 91-02 Mql \� VPCA 9I-02 ESPA 91-02R ; ?i - I 1 i `I i P N'Z7.Y y C.•6 w C N to \m m a) N C >.N : Ln N C.: w•Q 61 L D p 61�-•- A •U - u d t'in L..O CY L N O O C 8_'O y.m.y w.a, >a++ 0 m m L-- ala rn L" t mg - + U � cvL ° aM malo'tncw cm nNaai t L a mn .. y� ° v, L v roes c d 0 m m c alp yUO 1 aad .c > -c Lm a N;�'m 'm v Ltd -0 41 D? w E ty ww..0 O M dN,, O y N DIN O n•.O D U p d U C].E :' C.F N C C L t0.,^ -C 'p w C•« L L d V a+.. L�a..MCCl1 w�OE� N r IU4 NL 3�= U''".._!!1•.+•a.•N« d L cw '_^ 'm- aE w mw w uw- rum C L. os E 2 c > w Nm >`aaa M a-o 'o- p00= w E U 'm b O ? C a°+ .pC at O ,p A N. N �.CL, s! cw ,° � t vwm �; o cam`-°`` y {w/1 u Lw �Ltn ;p al,m 3.rya >M,'L. c to w. 'i, m o.o m n,w m m al a m.,C L N,.w � o > w Nww o � - p� 3e 3ro� ring' xa s.- >.w o,a), r w � rn � CA E �U > S� w w aCJtG +yDc >+ya �' C N0 CD m ar.' N �y =- Cy ?"CV« w.+ yoCaLi « L, wDULw w rnV row „ Ural rr_n wt_ c `yy�wa 1310 CJI.� L:. to N >. "O y �.C1 A',, d 0~ ?.O C•L C+D' CJf.C E C C ra E w3 « w Lw NM rrUs. L - Eryw c p yam U.+ CL C w.a A. m L �._-_ C tr w«.:++ w'e7 N•- D to _ - D N V.j'ai C«i!.w e al >..w C CL> d.0 I-' > u 3 ii1: ! y0,,L Lrz to a) .0 Q,c0.�.`t:7 w w D 1 : LA. +�I y� 'L N /co 41 N 61 D •3.1f C N CL C. C Mtl,>. - to o u y w w CL O O I' O p .> mm �- _ ouu. E- ac m ,v '� �''a ��3 a y Nm c�,LcwE '(�O. a'aO�i '4Y IB ere. Pa L tm a C M. � ° D oS++ �.a.,a rcp d L. 0 3$ r�: m t7 C d C Z7 v m- 3 C A w m w«., > v 6, O.A L L w C m O B d U U$L N jyl. .A >S...b2 a 01't0! V A L.�'•C tN ri I A H- d' in y. w- rCa+L✓ O L •� p Q'El o C ,D..S a s... a.N ra 3 L•+. > CL >'$ Gt ry« 00: C! •C Fj p O C-0 C C°C 1 I ,w d.,L $a: .".MwwN ;;, C G. 4Sj p.w[,y mQJ F-S oaNwLL > m y�aa y L w� cwi ro m °D'°ya c m o C Lin G C � C« CU- ccN° '$ cReaaXi a=6 " ® c U= CL M � ° 0. ... E _ laa - a s v mu Cne �» p•o LSO paC 0 IV i 'O� it9u mG.� CL.� � tOCNN y C 3 E$ .4 LVj 0:.Ea.,, Y .� u C� " + O >. O y�'0,,w V O.i o 0 > (D L0E s. ( w I'u'a=° Um v:m VEu 6P! �'•'U0 in CL- era ®'- a � „ CLC-� CLCCm 0) M u L s L � Iwto a« m 4!' OM-- aw Cl « m; CiM �'£� O •� d�' OEoo « ;; w Co nd CwE wCL Cap C13N- IU N L O 0 1 � CL>>.. joaiC �±oTa a�tJ � c niL � u U `-.a.�f_ cc N M A .., a+ C t9 c�D 0 fly > 49 }. M N N w CAC L. 7 O 09a.C. ,� p>� « L C a.+ N w A:, C« C« m.c d L e C; a a;v a o`I C y= 6t e9 `v° u o m ._a C._ w w dl 3 w �aNECL > a �0yw.0 � 11 'uV a uc+, w °,LwL� w us wLsE '°iy CnC jai y� `° a ° c a '" yloUct �u rnarn, sdootc , o, csy:' eC 3td aawM r r; U C3 61_ ... �+°H .+ N p, v O.C7 LLB " m.aC u to J, U ai�T C N U4- r - 1 N C B.� y p `OOri 14 .0 ' I L •- O r U .G C Cl y p fA O 3 L O C) J C y L L<L l 7 U C: d C 01v N U� '2C) 01 C m v N Q' C— .�J c roov, ui o " m'L' oo xEa,«me 11Ln C5oao c"iE-L N 93%ila E C m y of C a _ y d > opc ;� � a, oErnEcm to ° v'o N y N C ID a"U t C 7~N L O r L O N.a ,� y �•`.gip.C7 Ct C of G O O N w i S.. C w :N 1E. O • �:C O a'p O,"'' O O an, >p'a N 3 CT,O U C) m O•p O a L N L L O C. p C > ?�'-' L O O U to Cl.0 •E:Ti CJ L C p U r L > C:� •;? :a 'C G c O✓ C -"-• m N 'L f- 7 1i-u w :'0.•�7.0:5 C,d L .,,_•L.y O N •}"e..d U 0,� O y p •m E O t n.y' Cwy. C D7� w Q., y y+ o y-a.:... E U _ y y C L r d N N'—• 10•— "aO O.O 3 4.1 W.0.d Q) w 'L_ O QuB,c.p+ C 4!N U �.4-w y C L C C {y'X O t Cs V C.:.+4. C O C7 �. O 6L N C O..- 10 �.. 3. O NE. O.dL.V.•N t0 C Oe..j0+ war..+-r.N"� C7'C 19 > N U O C C E E C w 10 0 O O 4- Q) Cl 0— C.-•a -O U d C7 O y td Q t y a w.- p O N w 'a C '1 O.-tr C 2i N C) �- C Cl O O L �, >L ++ C, y d C Z7 O , L O._. O a O 0 C > +.' N'CS Cl Gl f0 Gl:L C � y fCp c o A• E~ d fGO E E > Gi`p d w E a > C++� LO �+w � a C C7 EGL7 tV_. O C� G oCO N -' Ci 41LE � G ,cu c � � yr a� ?MM rmm o Ewa °D:E E c4- '- E o3g� u, pInyL V w:y _w C u-. > L p p f0 V .L L :Ci d _' O a.+ 19 N 67 >.- O C— C s C to p N.-C7 >.C >.C1Jly= +' d L L c. .+ U m > U >. C7 L�7 O G'— _N E •O-.C _'� f0 CAI+ L C >,N N V G''." -•C M C`C'a '•'•a•— U C.E G O• N O cu'a o V C) C 2—,o y E .:y C 0 61 O w $ C � O `+ 7�•L >•w •C E O�...� o+ .+ aa,,,C. a"'"«' L. O Colo C„fl.w _�' C.s+ "N to C) •_. y y A a-w EL10 I— 'a d .3 ° CVi Z C«+.M Q' > O ? N L a d ¢ iL OW NIn >• • O y CU O m o=pi Q 0) C + _ Mc InNN - > Ea ��°a > Oa X ° Ecd } fop O � N O>.N C O 5 2 A) Od C IuL) _ E v y•Q cc L `�- 6 O G ya0r:C1 � O�,a O C ad - C .°.� y o w C* �•w d o3.. o d L >L d L 3J10 E Co d'o °.a ...a,� o:.o ou °� o_ Nc > wEo ��u�.v > 0IM 'c u�uE40wX_ obi0 E csto""�yo �o v � �m � o�� w � bc, r L a _ ai n «+ o >•-o E Sa - 1 �Cv L 1== c�m; �y a U CL C 6 E'O O C.O W C L. V G V� to :m O e V b. y L to /•!.V C—~ O:rL.. �' to D!✓ 'L N j.� ,p .� p .-V. )�p1 z •"NL6''COa,0..�G cqCtd Xa�C.D w`>°'..:°q:.oN.. uu ua> E O O d tN/d tbQEa La yuQ)jo tj oC, any C — ca a; O 0y J L - ay0o 344,[a C0C � c I- L. �rZ . N .H cC L A ►0�u,,® O � Ca Cl r C O N 0 IC E,_ ro Ur to L d tl 2 W-y C C R O C'i Q ., tZ2O O > C �C ®O yN O 0 O '�. a > t y E 0 0 O W L r N y .a U .10'a w tet .4.:B m m y ca >.O S at to �u•• m a, d C a 6/ $ u•—, d•C v. w EaD OTC v� No � >,y � � o`y 7 omo �� A {L;A CD�. L..a3 L0d M��� ✓ C 3G Ta7.NE fC C >._ p mC) 0 C�cc N� CO'O y9N > wO � N O o- O » X-00CL '0M-_ = *Eo 1 o A�wp'.'�W>�;q�.�o�y'�qo�•eV•�-'DE00Eu:.'(,.�vAij1.�0oy�n VON tn Ca a._ ea Ca u'V Co Q ®' ® a s w o- A C11 Cb :. N o roCL 0 cvo o�en 7n d of vpi - Cn c e =:5 L fj}i EEE W tO C Eon M M M U'f' O .o a 4� W :1 >'1 w m,ro > _ y Ji O M v3 COl1. 11f N .. s e e Z d M E E E 3�- »➢ A Z m J W tm CA .y o F a r, ;� v CNN W N S:C:C CL CC.- = C �y CL v.5 A `°6?i ' E'E E eo E ;8 F L. N e`S m m tff p �i O w G O Yo.0 ®. a N w x E a p 41 L.CJ�. O L 4n=Q «. ...I Z w u �l p *0 -V tv m rtf N m en s c N 0 U. � Ero ro � N p Z r CD Z d O A a0+ O,d 3. > 0) C c X al a0i N Q L.L L d., C L 97:r C O 3 rn e N O O U p. ro y p �. .ro 't'p m m � L �¢� a � �+ �Jti� o L L L a, : > Q L. J 'U (h ! 1 tip U. < (- k- O a> t tn N E Ash 2 . Ul E 4) ro S2 w � A. (D V En ui r - d is �.w L W LU t0 1.1 W ri U IV l a Q L� Lc LC .' utu C auf I (D.Q a to,Q c o C ° .v ai to u) : c o =a y m C 'p wr CD V Z Eno0 ou oo pOje+� Q t; c'2a5�i y °cam o u�i a 5 m 0 W to /I4)) C -d d o �'O a rJ r°? b ., LmA t0 U el JO C 3 V W F c i !L o o I a Ul to ul .,+ �...rA d Q. po o LA C ul 3� O v .a w L. y R d ® d �u y 1. cn p y IM u tt7 r+ t0 yymm spa Q En_ C 81M ca V :2 i S. F" o a 5 v «+ �r> Q i «Qri c U w r+ 'C rn= i C ,o- �` 01 yi .0 t7 C CCU '= O C..� Im m C X at U C C tD L N -U. L C C a G) a °e a' d a a «` '� a tom � 'M Q¢ �. � ' n s0. G~7 Ate 7t N ? •O b0..a'L'� fU0 N N qOj N e' w °U A C7 RS C07 d: 'a Lr_ i O.- U Ll- H.O r O CftU A N O U y°.w 61 d qT.E'i O r a al, c C R o rn L. m a N E c i a« u: A`N,ClT'y � �CaC .G � �.. COTW°LL (U7lL.W ro�N. ��,,a to qu . Cyc d Zm - Alu cwT a o o- 'Q N i f0 aE o o, a M C m w a L °.,.t ..... Q a Lq= d) Cti. O 0 ro? O M.D. C E i9 -� C �. aii °. m cai C O9 s v m• 00.A C:.l�'7i+�E a. B. >_ R a.: CT MC V CO U = EQCeA w U d 6�14,aTSUa0 -_HC 'a CD J_ « a O._ D.C a 4s ,�G .y . vT N QI..Gi a+ L.O N N�w r L� i 4. O a O.ra•w Uj Ln ioc eoaS° ,cCal c am S. S � `% o�`'=•� awc `c° � R O• L'3. L N`O di'i9 N..a f0 L e C RI a s°'E 0- U U ° C6l�aN+A OD '�J N y O s L�cmC4..-aC7p .0 aO:e S y `�4 N 0 afj.0 l9 lCa:� d� �.. a a- O Q'•O�p`O.•� O MM U w !�'II m C GT U,c° a$�` a �1� N A Em W'_N U L ZZ1.1. N N N N S $ ¢T , a E E y ® e$, .g�� 0. ��:> x w w.W-,.� l0 p. C1'O' M v- of O Oi p,. •n.W a a A `0 E.a+ ,.a��� O .Q r.CT (9.ya`.O r N GT U GOT.° C e i C .a+ c L«. a v m c iu G" .C�a,,�1. N E= E mT '6`�. 'o_'� '_oIs Ell :w 0`-1...cai:�y n'i-„ a 0 qj a RJ 5° O r. s y s -s L O L o :+ u U �Au R m la.f- Vim U.e.51en u. U o L. C� z m i fd p �p ° �S O�A y a a C07 a� ICU . w, ,S.S S E C Cui`O �, to $ Ha. II�,V CNN� AV �M a OCNNNC /9 V�O' W a T m ARO IA I; ii l E k�} cu pj� Q.N 9 �'� �L C �• 'A N. t�N ca L. L N L W r. C fli l0 TM e+o+ O.a L ® dS C N O ? O cm o m' 0-0 C N a �. 1 MOW L O tOA� e W [�S' p g.L C gN� GL $O v ,a Q ~ p \\ L a O M a 'a to M lC.. •- t7 'a L. O a T L L y e 'A iT E tic r.Q, C 0. M > C.La �l9 •�a�+to t° C !C .®Yfj_t V� a \ yM c � ai cie �tce N'C�H,pNLV000GT aT� a �., vtv '� ar a 4 a E Nh V C m o Q90 L C1 O C lack L. S. O E .m y •� C p E C. -'O M r4 U.0 L N•- e 9 N N C m a o ? N a 1 ti Z.C tA 1A .0 m O g_. g CL c ;\ .+ O 6T C N •a a? m- O m C=to u j Q L M'c 8Ya O .N L i > -Cod-)..�V y •L V �.-� OU e.p� Q.Q:y, c,L;�., c L c daoT \ i mcn � L ®aodco g 07 A m0' LLC.� ® Fi (Zia tA20acu o COL GOs. ?AM Co I- �], a o C _ e t9 W -g V ® >7 w . O O go"•' a/v6! "d a m W•O C 4f r 01 N Lo 41 CU In _ o.w d C'_O+ 3«O �.0 D Z� H C ?��+•C m e N d•O t=4 m E u afiy0gM:nc� L N aM La L s E m� yCQ)V > a ' op W L. i► FA a O? p� Z0 i�ifi CCQC~•a 10.N+ 91 ; ¢ •fl q M L C U j..+ Oi C 47 L� _� a, w p N � Tg��r=L�7L=o U� m L 5`5 Q V 0 p" C C =.l`O y\�N Ca M c �. oar «. :2 CM •�HaLimdcumiE _ c y.tm 0 ors, ►%tea, c d ua�Gp >X o o m M�.°'csAff'} N.A N N. N 6! t Pi '. O.U =N a 47.+1 C C w> Uoo cE - o �o « � °' °1iEcj��1° c yam C 'O CJ fly 'L7 0, E a n d•N a �3N 04>f •a 7� Na+ COfsS� tO ,tN � to Q Ca Q m.0, D m >.y d 4)C«„?.0, O.\N 0 0 _ 0 U>,t7 (n U)w ♦N'O Q Hai d .fir .C. A.C =tea U > GL7ry- H .0 a al L X y N N C O C al T.N N. Sl O y M=.•o 0.O N•y C.L. s+ i 0.. E'er -�.. ✓° •�f ; > E EC .?L c 0.0 CL >�d cp c�cyro3L aita «E o F >W o s 3 i'C c?: ai E c s mom;._ cq �� .Q � n _yL �g'o e w .9 .E Wd 71 mu N N al m,C.r 0 0 U O= -61 wCL a «.d L U.II.y O N wU 0•c.. <+ -O a7 Na N U vt m W C� =LO to cL. 0u > WC a =CIN tAUL y 0 S P Q_ roar E~ as.:0 U r =to.L.A •Q E > L. �.C.. t d tn N 1L0 aT a N..a*rt~ N m tt y-0 0 a N 0.'0 G L.0 0 � R - A N M U O.�.e M y iL w -v L'O y.C.A w C.00..C L. ;i Q.' dal 0 L L. A U 4) « U m 1. 0 = W Z 01 >. S. d > fp. d y C.. 0 N.. 3 r+ ++ m Q y'•N d i C..Q O L E 3 E •= C N j. T,c- I. I Z i y �N v07i U. .. •y (v N CLX o�' 0,0 y w C». . ® tw09•L C !'` w..,Q V d =. y a: C C 0 U Y .+ oCL_ a y'C c = CS-- E = eon E m o -0 -0 Acv >'ycoa rc �� �a _ �w° fie 4L' G� o c�i > s m-° 0 ��M = m s a ,f �� d air �.. o tYl tJ ¢ .� m m U to co os W.2 a.cm�� a ;r�.�y�w m _ « _ 4)•� 41 F @ of al > 61: •O L1 W"Is: = W �. CC r-aac, = Cwl¢j4)= m m= SE I I£E CL rr �'.C.to .Z O OHO O O p p sm w rn c0 N tp e0.. . � Co D EE (aH u07iw H • =S .CS S W N i W J i i i i J y eom Om LL, ^ 0) w w_y H J to eMn D,7e in D% u' m + X 4 r' In F- W N L � �.r 41 tfl.S L N= L t7 01 01 61 O) w pl O C (� LL fpN=. C�t L�:MS V1.MS « �dff M�:sfim f MS iD` O C) A 2.2 Sp� L7 �Lebr � 6dl LL O� A V7 A OL• L , Cin 2.20 � Oro O «r g= LO AwAA CI p'C O O p E o3w � 3H 0U 40 a E `'j esup�i �uoi C t� O O Alp �i O O O R+ O t6 p C1 lE3 'C7 L !0�j N $.J M 9J L.J M 666 J M L L L J M L J M LZ. ac. � Q U. i N i t th 0 i J 1 LL d F i t H i Q yQ 9 z �l T E q, •C1 m ti t, ,) - f _d U :. V m 3 C C Q tpn C pn � A C h a O N m Ow M L• L m aJl� tCC m Q u).r w L!L ~ R O �+w C Y1 C m O d O U �1 •� p O aCWa pUj N C C O m ow.C N L .Gt C ,.'O ELM 7 « H 'cLi pp• N i3 w o o .as- m 6! .. 10 v O M. O. i N •o d� N a E > aru 41 a E�r. +. L a L U a .v r O �' U C O 61- O B ° m t., U S w p O w� ° cc 0. 0 'o to a o._ c c wo. a inL ico " r ' d E co 43 ° a cx =u N wL ° Q cm 00' w o E'a � R Y•' M� L cpi Q�.uCm �6� q� N ...CCC CD in ca A N %- I O}pqqp d T 0p row. p O d ° �p( .v7� .0 m H A � C. S. G7 ar m V A. 43.a •C Al m.m. w W. y� r E C L •� N U: U �yp a1 C N C'Q L L a C v v p i Y! Sid«tip Z° ^� oN r 4vwis E ,,a - ,<ai w si ai y 0 gig a ° Ol SW ..OQ 3. .t. E � C aO >0) ,bt d,0 ram �p OE ro a y w.. m •�Q � .C '�a� a C cc�d � w d -°�F-M ro C 'O',d y in o-o .. Nymy o'o ms ` In ro, CdGa.L.. O.�y .d0 E s c y y;:. -c 0.0 y sti-loft a o c ° ',v c E 0-to— co o y C� yesy >u °aa� �O �L "�'��� o�� tn va 3a�' m .c C d �L• row. v ��w :: "o �a-aaa,y `n•c �' x lLo a�i tm ro 7 C G o 0., E..tn SZ 0. > O Lzmzmf0 dam. o> Cy f0 o r ?Ac a E y C a ,C tp..�a O t0 ro m« >a >ow a a ro? .C � L.NL•-0 towC� L: 0 O V Wpm t.47 in E•p m y W VE y 5.1' 4? tn �� oEo ro p� H 1 E, mIA �,� -y �- f��� fl Ea wr C , E w X U L7) <t Vcc tn ul in COL � La~>i �: �y L a � to u in d y N Q `t� CmJ '>-r - M- :2 a) 'd C d CpL CS y M o u> t > tt aci y c—y 11 C '� m roy ,O 10 a 3 C m ."I a _N ro Y2. d 41 N CD w cp w..a�VC CoC C C « C1�L rn E V E a C0 1 mC U C C so^,v V d �? rod des 7 7� t Dro 0 of �=a^ U a tt co tea U y in m E co N c ; IA m ..� ; x C-0 ' o ` 9 l� RESOLUTION NO. 88-161A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ESTABLISHED POLICIES REGARDING'LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION DRAtifNGS r1 , WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, on August 10, 1g,98, adopted Resolution No. 88-161 establishing certaiii policies regarding landscape and irrigation drawings to implement -the City's goals and objectimes. �j WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that there is a need to . add a policy to ensure the quality of the landscape materials. f NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED, that the Plannil5 Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby amend. their policy to'read: 1. The developer is responsible for the proper in.:�tallation and completion of all required landscaping. Cam' 2. The developer 'shall s1±;qit landscape and: irrigation plans for review and approval to the Planning.. vision in a manner prescribed by the City Planner. Said plans shall be prepared by a registered Landscape Architect whose stamp shall be conspicuously affixed to said plans, 3• The developer,-;,ball retain the services of a registered ` Landscape Architect to providekU3pection of the installation of the landscape -and irrigation system. It shall be the Landscape.Architect's responsibility to inspect or direct the inspecti, of the installation of plants, materials, ' and irrigation systems in complianca3 with the approved plans and' vJth City Standards requirements and Conditions of Approval. I 4.. The developer's Landscape Architect shall inspect and csrtifj the quality and health of the landscape materials. Such certificationY shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to installation ibe landscape materials. S. The eeveloper's Landscape" Architect shall notify the Planning Division immediately upon the installation of any material or equipment other than shown an the approved pl�..�s All rhanges",are subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Upon completion of the project.' the developer's Landscape Architect shall submit a written report to the Planning Division,inclu�ngc a. A certification In a form prescribed by the City Planner that the work was completed in accordance with the approved pans and with City standards, exclept as listed in (b) below. { i j BLAWNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Nd: 88-161A DCA 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 10, 1991 Page 2 b•; A L+'stin� of any deviations from the approved plans'or from City st?rdards and the data- of approval and by whnm;YrSn the Planning D'igision,= ?` approval was granted for said deviation. i D c." built" set of landscape and irrigation plans. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OE oUNE, 1991. _ 1< r. , PI-WNING COMMISSION OF ,HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.' BY: c Larry T' McNiel, Chairman ; f ATTE57.;,. <, Brad Buller, Secretary (� (' s Y, Brad Bullerr, SecretOMIJ of the Planning Commission of the City of Rauchor, Ask Cucamangu, do 'herrel-y r.'2rtify that 'the. forgoing Resolution was duly and -egularly introduced{ passed, and adopted by the Planning cmem3.C• `i ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamoniga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of r'oune-1991. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: IJ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: - AHSE'W11 COMMISSIONERS: �10 µ, IK RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMHISSIOly OF THE CITY OF 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA, .CALIFORNIA,. 'RECOMMENDING APPROVAL a�F y;r DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDzG 'TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING VARIOUS 4(, -DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS,, AND MAKING 'FINDIMS `SIN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. w y {i) < The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an `applicatisan fax Development Cade Amendment 91-02 as "described in the >Itif,-le ;-of. this Resolution. Hereinafter in this�Resolution, the subject Deveiopine;at,Ui.stXict Amendment request i-)xeferred to rs "the application. On July' 10,6 1991, the Planning Commission of tha,City,of Rancho Cucamonga conducted; a duly noticed public hearing on •the ;application- and concluded said hearing on that slate, - K (; ii) All legal prerequisites 'to the adoption of this Resolution have. B.I/Resolution. NOW, T;IbREFORE, it is Hereby found,( determined, and resolved by the f Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga`as,,follows: ?'` 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds-that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part Al of)this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evxdence -presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 10, 1991, including"'written a, and oral staff reports; together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically 'finds as follows: a) That -,the Amendment will 15iovijis for development of a.f comprehensively planned urban'communxty within •'the District that is superior to development Otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and b) That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner,consistent with the General Plan and with related development and,,growth management policies`of the City; and c 1<j E r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOI•'jTION NO DCA•91-02 - CITY,OE' RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 10, 1991 nE _ Page 2 n `• 3 ,Based apon theks, cial evidence prtaenred to this Commission' ` during„the above-referenced ptib"1_ •.'hearing`and upon the s,'tecifie findings.of facts 'set forth ;.n paragraphs l and '2 above,{ this Cokniesion hereby finds and= concludes as follows; fl r f.. a) The Amendment is Ln conformance NIA'h the General Plan. 1 b) The,,JAmendment will not create'a significant adverse effects on the environment. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project?has beEn reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further,-7I this Commission hereby recommends ,to the City Council that a Negative Declax'jgtion be issued.; -' S. Based upon the finding and'conclusions 'set forth.in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Comm±asiom.hereby resolves is follow;§: a) That pursuant to Section 65850.to 65855 of 'the • California :Government ,Code, that the Planning Cc Missign of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Deve?_Ipment Code Amendment 91-02. : 4; b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that" the City Council approve:and adopt S1eveioptse+t , Code Amendment 91-02 to ;.odify';the`'Municipal Code-per the awtached Ordinance. _) That a Certified Copy of ,thin Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Dla?�ning - %Commiesion. shall be forwarded to the ,city Council.' 6. The Secretiary to this commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JUhY 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: -Larry Ts McNiei, Chairman ATTEST: 6 ' Brad Buller, Secretary h. Y „ - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION'NO. DCA 91-02 -"CITY OF RANCKOiCUCAM6HGA July 10, 199l., n PageAft 3 r l 4 S, Brad Buller , s,4f t10'retarg of the-.Planning Commipsion of the. City of Rancho' Cucamonga, do, hereby certify that. the'foregoing Resolution was -duly I and _egnlarly in£rodveed, passed, and adopted by the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plann}ng Commission held An the 10th day of Suly 1991, by the following vote-to-wit:^aj AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERSE n ABSENTt COMMISSI^NSF.S`e r o J I) r l I l� J to� ZC rl {' i3 0 _.1 I', RESOLUTION 40. 4c� A RESOLUTION Or THE Pig 14NING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ,CALIFORNIA, 'RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERM VISTA PLANNED 'COMMUNITY VMNDMENT:91 02, AtL''NDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT., STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDFhTIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERtOF. A. Re itals. J q, (i) The-City of Rancho. Cucamonga has filed an application for A�ifrra k3' Vista Planned Community Amenihant 91-02 as described in the title f` this j Resolution. Hereinafter,in this Resolution, the-subject"Terra Vista Planned " Community.Amendment request.is referred to'as "the, applfoation." `s , (ii) On July lO, 1991, the Flanni6. Commission of the City of Rancho (,ucamonga conducted a duly noticed ,public hearing g) the application any; concluded`-said heaping 'on that date. -' ►f i) A11 legal prpxequis tes'to ;the adoption of this Resolution heve ` occurred. B. Resolution. v 1 NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, ;and revolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1., This Commission hereby apecifically finds that all`'o£ the facts I sat forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct, 2. . Based upon cibstantial' evidence presented' to this Commission during the above--referenced public hearing on Ju1y'1D, 1931, including written and oral staff reports;^together with public temtiiwny, this,Commission hereby specifically finds as fellows' a) That the Amendment wi11 provide for1v development'of a✓f comprehensively planned urban community within the,District i that is superior to development otherwise allowable under .;; alternate regulations; and b) '. That the Amendment will provide for development within cue Listrict in a manner consistent with the General Plan and"' �'ith related development and growth management policies .of 11 th"e City; and �C [tie f r r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLDTION L70:' TVPCA 91--02 CITY OF RANCHO cucAMONGA" July 10, 1991 Page 2 3. Based upon the subetarstiaT evid nce presented to this Cow—scion during the above-referenced public bearing''and'upon the spec f�c &idangs of, "i facts set. forth in paragraphs`--1 and 2'above, this Commission 22�re- ind"a and concludes as follows: a) That the proposed amendment would not have significant 6 impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; -and. ' 3 i b) That the proposed ndi,ndment is in conformance, with_uhe General Plana ='lt II 4. Thiz; commi.naioA�hereby finds and certi Aks that'the projeet has been reviewed. and considered in'�!compliance-with the-California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hei h _rec mmends to t*e i City Council that: a Negative Declaration be issued. , wl 0 5,. -Based upon the findings and conclusion set. forth imparagraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,, this Commission hereby�ree:lve: as follows: Q v , a l a) That pursuant to Section 658s0 to 6sa55 of the California Government- Code; that the` Planning j� Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby rNcommends approval of Teru'l, Vista �( CommuniCy Plan Amendment 91-02. AOL b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends'that the City Council approve and adopt, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 91--02 per,the attached � Ordinance. ! I 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall 6l tify to the adoption of t;iis Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS LOTH DAY OFT;SIJLY 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY ,OF RANCHO'COCA(pdGA fF B'L: Larry T. Mchiel, Chairman' jL1 ATTESTS r_ Brad Buller, Secretary S) ,r IQ :7 PLANNINGCOMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TQPC1091-02 - CITY-OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA f July 20, 1991 Page 3 I, Brad Buller,, Secretary of the Fkaruiing Commission of the C `'y of .Pancho lr Cucamonga, do hereby certify that tlia foregoing Resolution was jduly and regularly introduc4U, gassed,, and adofjted by the �,Planning Comm sein of the `\City of P.ancho Cucamonga, at a regular meet ng of the Planning Commission held' on the 10th day of July 1991, by the following vote-to-wit': AYES: COMMISSIONERS; ` ,7 NOESi COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONgRS: � c U .i f l 3 . RESOLUTION NO. � - A RESOLUTION 4Or,THE-PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF f RANCHO-,CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL DE VICTORIA .PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT- 91-02, AMENDING? VARIOUS DEVELOP117NT STANDARDS AND 'DESIGN GUIDELINES FOk MULTI-FAMILY r,iDENTIAL DISTRICTS9 AND MMNG,,rnm21q'GG c IN SUPPORT THE OF. h �� A. Recitals. (i) The City of"Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application £oi� Victoria Planned Community Amendment,91-02 as described in the;title cf.+this ` Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution. the subject Victoria Planned Community Amendment request is referred to as Ithe,application." c1ti (ii) On July 10, 1991, the Planning Cemmisa3n of the City,of Rancho Cucamonga" conducted ,-'s3uly noticed public hearing an the application''and concluded said hearinglpn that date.- (iii), All legal prerequisil�es to the adoption of thia Resolution har occurred. E. Resolution. AML NOW, THEREFORE, it.-is hereby found, d@termineg, and resolved"by the Planning Commission of the u'ty of Rancho Cucamonga,,as follows: 1. This Comm seion'hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set`forth.in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantl'i evidence prevented to this Commission during the above-referbAced public 1,t)ai71 ang Rn July 10, 1991, including wri+;ten and!loral staff reports, together with Public.tostimony, this Commission ke eby specifically finds As follows: t> n a) That the Amendment will provide for; development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under' " alternate regulations; and b) That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner consistent with the General cplan and with related development and growth management policies .of the City; and I 4 L PLANNfir. COMMISSYON RtjrZLUTION NO. VPCA 91-02 - CITY OF FiNCEO CUCAMONGA Juiy10, 1991 - Page 2 n 3. Based upon the substantial evidence niesented try this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and'upon the specific findings of facts set Forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby`finds and concludes as ;follows: a) That the proposed amendment wou3,d not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding pro rties; and b) That the proposed amendment 77,in conformance' with the General Plan. 4. Whirs Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with t&k'e California Environmental r Quality Act of 1970 and, Further, this Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that a'Negative Declarat;on be issued. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and. above, this 'Commission hereby resolves as follows: a) That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the j California Government Code, that the Planning Commib`sion of the City Of',Rancho' Cucamonga 1--hereby recommends approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 91-02. 3i The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Victoria Community Plan Amendment 91-02 per the. attached OrdlnancP.. 6. The is Resolution Secretary to this Commission shall certify-.to the 'adoption o£ tTi . APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS LOTH DAY OF JULY 1991. PLANNING COMMISSLON OF THE CITY OF RANCho CUCAHONGP_ ' r� BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST:" Brad Buller, Secretary T1 ' GV 0 1`J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. '!' VPCA 91-02 - CITY Or,RANCHd CUCAMONGA July 10, 19,91 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of"the.City of ,Rancho, Cucamonga, do hereby,; certify that the foregoing Resolution was()duly and - regularly introduces, passed, and adopted by the Planning commi'ss on_of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular taeetiiig of the Planning Commissior h'cld on the 10th-clay of July 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: u AYES: COMMISSIC'NERSe, ll NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ti_1 i ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: u t. _ r l w 7 ;1 t? ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF Th-- CITY' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO \ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE' AMENDMENT 91-02 ? AMENDING TITLE 17 01 THE MICRO -� CUCAMONGA`MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ,AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. V A. Recitals. 1 E ., r7 (i) On July. 10, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamorga conducted a duly noticed public .hearing with respect to the above'- referenced DevP'7pment. Code 3►mendmEnt. Following the conclusion of said public hearinr"'.-she Planning Commission adopte3,�esolution No, , thereby recommendingl..nat the City,Council adopt Development Code Amendment.No. 91-02. (ii) On , 19 , =the City Council of the City of l Rancho Cucamonga, conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Ordinance. �A ' (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoptt�3n or Uds Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: Section 1: This Council herf.by specifies anA finds that,,-11 of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Fart A, of the Ordinance area-true and correct. Section 2:-,This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. r' Section 3: The Rancho 61camonga City Council finds as follows: a) The proposed'Amendment would not have significant adverse impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties,- and b) The proposed Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 1 It sr1Y� � y f�41 UNCIL ORDINANCE NO. �J DCA 91-02 CITY CO - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA \J f Page 2 ABL Section 4: The City Council of the City of Ranch,' Cucamonga,?,ireby approves Development Code Amendment'91-02'as follows: (15 a) Title 17 of the :Rancho Cucamonga kIunicipal Code is hereby amended- by modifying Table 17.08.040 (B) and 'Table 17.08.040 (C) as attached hereto and incorporated herein by . this reference. b) Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cq�e is hereby amended by 'codifying Section., 17.08.040: (G)`'as attached hereto and incorporated herein'by this reference. -'' c) Title 17 of the `.Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby -amended by modifying Section 17.08.040 _(&) as attached hereto and incorporated herein,by this reference. d) Title 17 of the Rancho -Cucamonga Municipal Code is 'hereby amended by adding Section 17.08.040 (Q) and Table 17.08.040 (Q), as attached hereto and incorporated -herein by this reference. {fi e) Title 17 of th Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby rl amended by adds Section 17.08.040 (R) as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. f) Title 17 of the 'Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by modifying Section 17.08.050 (F)(1)(d)(3) as follows: An entira site plan shall be oriented so that the activltie s and functions are aligned hierarchically placing those least compatible fur:;hest from the common boundary between land uses and those most, compatible near that boundary (i.e., single story'—� adjacent,to single.story). g) Title ,17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amendetl by modifying Section 17.08.090 as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the'adoptiort of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be puklieaed within fifteen ('15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland valley Daily Bu?"letin, a newspaper of general circulation published irk the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of ;Rancho Cucamonga, California. ,r- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE_CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIF¢KNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA p*,1NNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMIxy RESIDENTIAL DISTRICVS, AND-MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. 'Recitals. O On Jul 10 19 1 X . � , the Planning,_Commission'�afthe City of 'Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above- referenced Terra Vista Planned Commua:.ity Amendment. Following the conclVmion, of said public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. thereby recommending that the City Council'adopt Terra.Vista Planned Community Amea,3ment No. 91-02. (ii) On ` , 19 , the City.Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a 'duly notified public ,hearing and concluded said hearing prioreto its adoption of this Ordinance'. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to thrdopton of this Ordinance have occurred. ti B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: Section 1: This Civuncil hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth. in +he Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct. I � , - ,Se Lion 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been) reviewed and considered in compliance wi;eh the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Cou.1ci;-'hereby issues a Negative Declaration. (; r, Section 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council;.finds as follows: a) That the Planning Commission of the City ty of Rancho. Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prf43cribed by law, recommends approval of the Community plan text amendment hereinafter described to the City'Council. This-.City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by taw and duly heard and considered said recommendation. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. TVPCA 91-02 CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pace 2tr �J b) That this{Communi.ty Plan text.amendment'is consistent with the General Plan of the City o` Rancho Cucamonga. c) That this Communiy Plan text amendment-is consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. d) That this community Plan text amendment will have no L1 significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative'Declaration filed herein. J Section 4: The CitytCouncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 91-02 as follows: a) The 'Terra 'Vista Community Plan text, Part IV, Design Guidelines, Subsection", "Residential Design Guidelines,: commencing ,,on page IV-3S is hereby amended, in part, to read as attached heretii and incorporated herein by this reference. b) The Terra Vista Community Plan text, Part ,,aV, Design Guidelines, Subsection "Residential Design Guidelines," commencing on;page IV-38 is hereby amended in part, to read as attached `aareto and incorporated herein by this reference. t}` c) The Terra Co sta Community Plan text, Part V, Community Development,,-'1-ndards, subsection "Residential Development Standards,"'"Tanie V--3, 'Building Setback. for Cluster and Innovative Development s and M uses) iq. hereby amended, in part, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. d) The Terra Vista Community Plan text, Part V, Community/ -1, Development Standards, subsection "Residential Development. "-- Standards for Medium and Meo?inm High Density," commencing on page V-14 and endin}q on page V-15 is hereby amended, in part, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. e) The 'Terra Vista Community Plan'-text, Part V, Community Development Standards, subsection "Residential Development Standards," Table V-4, Building Setbacks for multi-family develcpment (MR and H rises) is hereby amended, in part, to read as attached:,hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. f) The Terra Vista Community Plan text, Part V, Communi,,, Development Standards, ,subsection "It,-sidentia'l Development ` Standards for High Density," commencing on"page V-18 is - hereby amended, in:-part, ,to read as 'attached hereto and incorpo,�ated herein by rference. .t CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. TVPCA, 91-02'- CITY OF RANCHO CUEAMONGA G' Page 3 Section 5- Tli City Clerk shall certify to the`~adoption" of this �} Ordinance and shall: cause the same to be published within fifteen, S IS)days after its passage ja�6, p ge at least Dube in the Inland Valle Daily Bulletin,':r t newspaper of general circulaticn published i 1. n the City of Ontario California-1 ;; and circulated in the City of Rancho Cuq_Reonga, California. o f F t� J b (� �r ORDINANCAdEk E N0. AN O RDINAi: F� ,c TIE CITY Co vNcs; OF T HE CI TY Ti OF RANCHO CUCAMON_-.r CALIF&TWIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT�91-02P _AMi 61NG VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STAJRDARDS AND DESIGN 6tF DELINES .,FOR MULTI—FA2maf " RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, A�ID'rMMUNG FINDINGS IN 'SUPFOBT THEREOF. i r tf A. Recitals. (i) On Jul �A10, 1991, the" P�,�tnning Commiasi:.n of the City of &aneho' Cucamonga conducted a duly no'iced ,pv:3lic'hearing' with respect'`ta-..the above referenced :,11ctozia Plar:aed CS+E unity Amendment. Pollowin&the conclusion of'% sa' -,;public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution'No. , thereby recommending that the Citg Cagnc adop; Victoria Planned Community Ee.�nent No. 91-02. (ii) On the City Council of the City of Ran-to Cucamonga conducted a du �y noticed public hearing aand concluded said hearing prior, to its aZ.option of-'this 'Ordinance: (ii ) All legal prerequisites prior to the, adoption of thia'Ordinaace 4' have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: St,sticn 1:" This Council here*bp„specifies anZl finds tL all of the facts set forth in the.Recitals# Part A," of the Ordinance are. true and correct. Section 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and a.uisidered' ,in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of•1970, and further,^this Council hereby issues a` - Negative Declaration. Section 3 ie Rancho Cucamonga Catty Council^finds as � ollows: a)' That the Planning Gam fission of the Ci,�y of Ranglo Cucamonga, following'a public hearing;hcld in the time and manner proscribed by law, recommends a.nroval of the _ Co�tnity Plan text anendmenn.heaeimafter 4iiscribeft" o :the City:Covz�mil, This City &jncil has held A public hearing in the time'and manner prescribed bylaw and duly he&:."and considered said recoumendition, =' 1 " CITY COUNCIL'' ORDINANCE N0. - V P, 91-02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCaM4vGA 7 - Page -2 b) ThaL this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with ,the General Plan bf'the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) That'tthis Community Plan text amendment is consistent with .\ the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. d) That this Community Pl'ah `text (amendment will have no significant e(dvironmental�`impact as provided inri the Negatifve Declaration"filed hr,,xein> Section 4:; The City Counciliof the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby �upproves Victoria Planned Community Amendment 9.1-02 as+follows: a) The Victoria Community Plan text,: Part III, Section I, Regulations- and Standards for Development, -subsection "Residential Design 'vuidelina Medium D'gnsity Residential" commencingon page 224 is hereb amend 3 in p 5 y , part, to read as attached hereto and 'inaurgorati, herein by this reference. j b) The Victoria -Community Plan text, Part- III, Section 1, Regulations and Standards ( for ,Development, subsection "Cluster and Innovative Housing Setbacks," commencing on !l page 225, is hereby amendedin part,' to read as attached Ala hereto and kncorport d herein by this reference, e) The Victoria Community Plan tBxt:, Part III, Section T, Regulations , tnd Standards folk, Develepmenl,, subsection "Residential Development *aneiards Medium High Density Residential," commencing on page 229, is hereby amended-,,in part, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. d) The Victoria Community Plan text, Part III, .Section. I, Regulations and Standards. for Development -Standards, subsection "Cluster r Hop ing- Setbacks," commencing onipage -231 is hereby', amended to read--.,as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. ;e) The Victoria Community Plan text, Part; III, Section I, �{ Regulations and Standards for Development, subs sec tion 'Residential ,/-4 Development Standards High )Density _ --Lsidential,- 'commencing on page 232,, is hereby,r mended,'in ?tart, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein by -this reference. f) The Victoria Commuaty Plan textij 'Part III;^;Section T, Regulations and Standards for Development,f subsection o; "Cinster Housing Setbacks," commencing on gage 233 is hereby amended to read 'as attached hereto and incorporated herein by,.seference. r CITY COUNCIL URDINANC$,NO.lo VPCA 91-02 - CITY O ^RANCHO CUCAMONGA r t Page 3 �1 Section 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this° Ordinance ,and shall cause the sane Y.o�,be published within,fifteen (15) days after, its passage at least once in the, Inland Valley-`Daily Bulletin, a > newspaper of gencral circulation publshed:�in the City, of Ontario, California, aria circulated in the City"of Rancho CucaR�onga, California. t. a r i f` r t Lewis Moines Maaag'ement corpo 15 . ram-: i 6 Nort h Mountain Avenue P.O.Bo 7 'U' x b 0 1 Calfo a- rtu r�5- / sr� Ob70 1' G 714J98�0971 PAl{:714/949-6700 , July 10, 1991_ 1 q Cit o f Rancho Cucamo} a �.. Planning ;Commission Re; Proposed 'Amendment of Exhibit 'IF", Building Separation ti and 'Setback Standards Gentlepersons. b Enclosed please find the, proposed amendment of Exhibit, F1t which includes Table- 17..08.040-Q `Building Separation and Setback Standards, as well as:-the attached- graphics showing elevations, project 'entry, and building walls. 0 Sincerely; LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. ?, sph M. oleson T Vice President f/ Senior Project Manager art Tom. JMO:ksk , 1j _1 Enclosures z) !J 4 PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF EXHIBIT "F," TABLE 17.OB.040-0 BUILDING SEPARATION AND SETBACK STANDARDS DISTRICT =' ' BUILDING-SEPARATION A SETBACK D N M MH H. (A3' PUILDING TO HUII_DING FRONT TO. FRONT 20 FEET OR HALF OF THE COMBINED.HEIGHT, WHICHEVER IS . GREATER OTHER " OTHER (C) 15 FEET BUILDING TO DETACHED 10 FEET 10 FEET 15 FEE,T GARAGEICARPORT OR ACCESSARY BUILDINGS/ STRUCTURES OR ENCLOSED PATIO/BALCONY ` BUILDING TO CURB 10 FEET 10 FEET 15 FEET BUILDING TO CURB AT 20 FEET 20 FEET 25 FEET PROJECT ENTRY ., ` ti ENCLOSED PATIO/BALCONY TO 0 FEET 10 FEET 15 FEET. ENCLOSED PATIO/BALCONY OR GARAGE/CARPORT ' NOTES: (A) BUILDING SEPAP?RTION AND SETBACK SHALL SE MEASURED FROM THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDING WALL' `(B) "BUILDINGS SHALL MEAN DWELLYNG UNITS (C) "OTHER-" SHALL MEAN FRONT TO SIDE, FRONT TO REAR, REAR TO REAR, OR SIDE TO SIDE' l , _ JGC:CJc/dly10705 Z {j �J ILLLI a to ° tu LU LU ® z m A �� on lu i r-� _ = l �f.: { ��� L', � �\ _ \ \ �` 3 '� ,� ;' �� r � ,.��: _ '�. ,--' — _�=.� r�` �, �' '. ��ti'. . -; �: .; ��� ;�. v. c � � 1: i 4. 4. �� 4.i 1�t { ? 1 \ r .�Gy,+ ' fa. j. ��� _ i� �� �®Its' ������� � ���i. �I � �� �E � �, �� �e t� e , k ` ; ' I -`\ �. ,- �:... ,:.�. i 3�d- .�!f < ��« ® � �} . ��� — - � % « - % \ � : ��\ � . . > \ �� � \ ��` - > � �t& ��} - } , : ��\ ` &/ S �� �� � \ \ : \ : �\ � \ , � \ + � �© - ? � : �� / \ � �~� 1 (« �+ �} �% \ \ �\ a \ �. j , . . . . » �: �r��:2 © - _ < � �: � �} \` \ � } . . ��} - .�� - � ��� \ \ ��� \ \ � • f/r 2 t-' W At Lu _ u } ui t( u ® � r in I - z 1-0 69 0 N.LL Q 0 � � u-t J _ 111 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ANk DATE: ouly 10� 1991 ;f TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commis-ion FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDMENT 91-03 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add Section 17708.040-P and Section 17.08.070-E to : the Development Code establishing °property maintenance standards and ongc?ag maintenance requirements for Multiple Family Dwellings., , i I. BACKGROUwm On February 26, 1991, the City Council approved a Resolution of Intent regarding the future development of multi- � d family projects. As a result, staff has proceeded with the amendment process as outlined in the March 13, 1991 Staff Report to the Planning Commission. The amendments follow three separate tracks; 1. Future unit reductions by reducing the amount.vf vacant multi-family land in thz general Plan. 2, Upgrading.the City's development and design standards through a package of amendmenlss.to the Development Code and to specific and community, lana. - � - J 3. Upgrading the City's property maintenance regulations through a package of amendments to the Municipal Code. Track 3 is the subject of this report and proposed Development Code Amendment. I2. ANALYSTS: Current regulations for residential maintenance,do not /J differentiate between::_\ingle family and multi-family. units,, However, the tyj;a of MIZa? .enance problem that can develop are often very 'different. Unlike -a single Zamily home where one person is typically,responsible for the" property, multi-family �pYojects may involve mvRy individuals with various degrees of I , ! respon4ibility. This si 'ration often makes it difficult to apply !current property maintei :ce regulations on a consistent basis. To improve this situation, staff is proposing.r'two new subsections . �* ! for addition to the Development Cod:. These new regulations a-re n 1 'intendE, to meet the following tree objectives: PLANNING 4C6'MMISszo* sTAFr REPORT DCA 91-�03 = CITY- RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 10, 1991 > Page 2 1. Te clearly establish the responsibility of a ' ? property owner for the 'continuous maintenance of , their residential property] - 2. That multi-family residential developments must 4 maintain site improvements as they were,approved by the PlanningCommission; -` 3: To provide specific property maintenance requirements far multi-family residential developments 0WW SOHS19C1IONSe The first new subsection would be added to Section 17.08.040 of the Development Code pertaining to 'site development criteria-, Property Maintenance. �i�oerty owners are responsible for the continuous mainL\,knance of all buildings, ! i structures, yards, landscanii,4 signs, parking areas, fs recreational facilities ands er improv!ffents in a manner which does note detract from the appearance of _ the surrounding area: In addition;, multi-family residential developments ''subject to the Development/Design Review process shall maintain,�site improvemente in ° compliance .with all appl'cable Conditions of Approval imposed by the Piwnning Commission. This proposed subsection is similar to requirements f, and in the Industrial Specific Plan. Its inclusiga as a site"dsvrelopment requirement lays the groundwork for requiring program of ongoing maintenance from. the inception of a project. As a result, maintenance requirements can be addressed during the design phase and,more readily be carried over into the completed project The second new"subsection wou?Ld be added to b'ection 17.08.070 of the Development Code. This section Xaertains to ger.1 provisions such as sicfiis, vehicle parkiniT, storage, and property maintenance. !rle new ' subsea'F on ;]establishes additional and specific requirements for the property maintenance of multi-family - d*,ellings (see attached proposed Ordinance). This new subsection outlines specific maintenance requirements ` v for: 1. Buildings and structures;, 1 2. Landscaped areal V r PLANNINGtCOMMISSION STAFF REPOQ ,,' DCA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - July 10, 199i;� ,., Page 3 3. Parking and hardscape areas; 4. Trash enclosures 5..-. Graffi ci removal;,;, 6. Recreational facilities; rand; 7. Conditions of ap- Dval. These specific requirements will enable tfie_Code Enforcement staff to more readily convey the minimum acceptable standards of, raintenance. Rather than interprecing general Code requirements,'. 'this new section can-be utilized "as it', as a guide for property owners and on-site managers. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: mn many ways, the management of multi- family projects is similar�llo large, commercial developments. The existence of common and p4lic access areas, and the demands of many different tenants requiries a clan for cngbing maintenance ab3 personnel to =accompli, , t'Ye i4gk. "This similarity is most clear _ at the time of inita a planh ng and. development when comparing aesthetic considerations and si;a ameaw es. In considering tthi.s problem, f It is staff onclusion tilt ,property owners and managers of multi-family proje{uts are not 'adequately exposed to the initial development criteria.` Their ongo3'n4 mt aagtment'ax'i maintenance activities are often conducted rC_aendent of the original site development plans. The result is'-deterioration, of the quality appearance of the project;,` ,z, it was„oaiginally conceived. c \: The Conditions of Approval imposed by ta,__\Plannina Commission during the Development/Design Review procesb�can be used as a mFathod to ensure continced quality. Initiallyr,aew projects could ;rs conditioned to provide a maintenance`}plan�to,,;be followed by the property managem._at personnel. -,The plan wo!gd inclule, pros sions to meety the maintenance requirements of' tbe new 'subsection, 17.08.070-E. In addition :the plan can be used as a vehicle to inform on .situ personnel" of the site development priorititts of that specific project. Issues such as trae locations, andscaping, building color, site amenities, and the ` eason`for their importance can1 a addressed. It COACLUSIOR: The prpPosed Development Code Ams-ndmentl;and the. use , of Conditions of Approval can improve the'quality.of multi-family residential developments. This is accgmpl.istbd by c'�aveloping a framework of specific re4arememtg and consister:t; application of standards 3};e 'improvements achieved' are more,S,the result of education 1-land monitoring of;:conditions than of enforcement rs _ 3i _ ay rf PAANNIN� COMMISSIO"TAE'F REPORT DCA(,91-03 CITY,OF'-i.ANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 4 :i ? action. It is,,, stuft'S posit,4,0n-r that the City has adequate regulations to ensure compliance; what is ,pr`oposed are regulation and procEJures that 'm66ivdte '�Foperty cress' co meet the 7M requirements by their own effort si)" III.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT^. 'Staff :Las c6mpica'ter Part II of_the f�. �nv.ronmenta2 Checkl dt and con tiuded that the propoAed Amendment' would not create signifi�ant adverse erivironment� imracts. If the Planning Commiigtsicn concurs' wz� ,these i irdingsr issuance,,of a Negative Declaration would bec�pprziprza.e r- (.0 IV. CORRESPONDENCE_ This item,was, ada+Irtised AsSjaDVau2+�c Hear3., in the Inland valley Daily:,,,Bul in newspaper- To date, no ---- n rece correspondence,has beeiw3. V. REC01 SM- DATION: It ',is recommended "thakt!):hj` Planning Commission adopt *`se a+;tached Resolution reco*ehdin approval'of the propo9gd 'amendment toil the ,Cit� council -and issuance of a �Wegativa Declaration. r, Respec R City Planner: HH:RLA:ns� ' Attachments: Resolution of Approval Proposed:Ordinance of Approval411 l v • o 01 RESOLUTION NO. \t A RESOLUTION_,0F THE PLLNNING COMMISSION OF�"%THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCA14ONGA RECOMMENDIWG APPROVAL -OF DEVELOPMENT,' CODE ANDMENT 91-03, ADDING A 3dEG? SLjEoECTI M3 ON,17.0S.``j140 I4� AND A NEW SUBSECTION 17.68.070-E TO THE DEVELOPMENT CGz ' x � - ESTAWiISHING PRO�SRTY MAIN'";"NALICE STAtt'DAF3S AND ONGOING MAINTI�:TANCE REQTJSRBMENri'S^FOR ,MULTIPLE FAHIr•Y DWELLIDiGS, Ar7 MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. .•JWHEREAS,.,on the 10th dap utf July 1991,- the-,Planning Commission held a &uiy, adrerf sed rublii^,.hearing pursuant to Secticn ;65864 of the California Government role ' "SECTION 1. TheRancho-Cccamonga Planning; Cammission'has made the following find-Ings;- t w i>> A. Thet tl--amendment is an implemGntatlon'of the l�enefaT"Plan goals and policies, onc` B. That the General .Plan ;;nvirormental Impaat7'teport adequately covers any pctantial significant adverse"irirpacts, and '. C.`� No substantiiil chargL-s are proposed in any goals o policies, which would r�quire major.reviszo�S to the Et ai�nmental'Impact ReisoYt ! r4 ` SECTION 2: ` The Rancho CucamonoarJhanr, ng,Commi.shSon b,-s found-that t`sis.,amendment will not create s a sic_nlc� t advers effect on, the environmeii. -r-'' and heraby xeccmme�ds to City c` uncil hie issuance of a Negative Declaration. 'NOW, THEREFORE,,'BE IT RESnLVEDF�d j it That pursuant to Section:. 6585ff' to Sfi�S of th.' California Govern�menn { Code, that, .,t Planning Co=i;ssion of the City of Rancho C.'ucatonga ri� cb' recommends approv;3- of D,�yelapment Codec f ent %90 13 2) The Planning Commission heret3 �ecommancs tihat the,— Ci ty Council approver` ana adopt D9ratlooment Code 5 Amendment 91-03 to modify the Muna.ripal Cedo�,Fer the � attached�brdinauce. > !� a1 SECTION 3: K"'he Secs:etar 'a; this-Ctmzsission sY,nll certify to the adoption of this Resolution. i� L t V _ Q L4 f 61 PLANNING COMMISSION"R:SOLUTION DCA 91 03 -;,CITY OV RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 10, 19,5i s Pege 2 APPROVED Atiii APOPTxtJ r'F3YS,10TH DAY OF DULY 1991 yl � PLANNING COMMISSION OF'THE'CITY-OF RANCHO CUCr;"^Aa 7l yn t, BY:-, - r Larry T. M!Wie1Q Chairman 1,1 ' j1 ?iTTF.ST• �, - a +e ' t Brad Buller,,Secretary �L = (� i` I, Brad Bv'1er, Secretary of t14'-It inning Ccmmissi r bf the pity Hof Rancho, Cucamonga, do hereby cercifv /Chat lthe foregOing 3,Reso ut-:on` was-.Aul' and >> regularly intros iced, pasged, by t$e..-Planning Commission of tine Cat;^of Rancho Cuca_raonga, �t,a -regular meeting c�'the Planning Commission,held on trig 10th day of July 1991, by the rollowing v9 a-to`=wit: id = L AYES: COMMISSIONERS: a NOES- COMMISSIONERS: ; ABSENT: L`f1SSION$RS: n„ _ � l ONE- ORDINANCE NO. 1� 7 n AN i aA)I`IANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP''-THE CITY'OF RANCHO 1 CUCAMONGA., CA4�70RNIA ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 17.08:040aP �5 AND ANEW SUBSFCTION.,17.08.070-E TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONO3A I mulacIPAL- 'CODE PERTAINING TO 'PROPERTY MAINTENANCE STANDARD s .AND ONGOI .I ',MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS a A. Recitals ? `=3) On`:Tuly 10, \19gl, the Planning Commission of the City of - Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing Vwith respect to the, i following proposed amendment to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Plunicipal Code (hereinafter rr,7erred to as the`"Development Code") regandi;g regulations ,' -for 'pi'opertI ; maintenance standards for mV'.�tiple family dwellings within residential districts'cc=the City. At the conclusion of said public hearing on O'une 10r%1991, the Planning Commission adopted, its Resolution No. * thereby recommending that - this Council adopt the;,proposed Development Code Amendments as 'set forth in this Ordinance. ;i� '4� �•, ; (iii) � the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga' conducted ,I C�1y noticed ,public hearing gtith,. `respect to the proposed Development Code amendments as set forth herein &Vtd said hearing was concluded prior`tc the adoption of this Ordinance, (iv) legal prerequisites prlar' to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. Be Ordinance. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY qF 'I;7CH0'_CUCAMONGA:'9ES HEREBY ORD/,4IN As FOL1,OWS: � r SECTION 1 That all of the facts setrfforth in the Recitals, Part'A, of this Ordinance are true and correct r ;, .r SECTION 2: Subsection 0.08.040-P is-heraby adde&'to the Development Code of„ the City of Rancho Cucamonga t6' read, in woxds and_ figurtIs;',As e follcws- 2. Property Maintenance. Property owners are responsible for the ,continuous `maintenanco of all, buildings{r structures, yards; landscaping,' signs, f.' CITY CO IL ORDINANCE NO. - DCA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO diCAMONGA Page 2 ! " \ parking 'areas, ,recreational facilities and other improvements in a manner which 4�es not detract from the appearance. of the surrounding ,,.area- In addition, Multiple Family,Res ,.;zntial Developments . t- subject to the Development/Design Review ,,process sha?.i maintain site improvements in Compliance with all applicable conditions of approval imposed by,the _r Planning Commission. SECTION 3: Subsection 17.08..Or?0-E is hereby added,,to the Dwelopment Code of the.City of Rancho;_Cucamonga for read,, zr. words and £i'ures, as follows: it E. Multiple Family Dwelling Maintenance.% The=following !1; maintenance re rirements shall,,be applicable to all Multiple Family ;Residential Developments in t�V-n to other general maintenance provisions of -this Cede. ' I.-Buildings and structures:" _ a. Shall nbt be pexmLtte3 to deteriorate, orxemaln 1nan unrepaired or dilapidated cditic>>n c�n ; b. Building exteriors shall be maintained, Fainted or` treated to provide for weather � J p prot,Rtiont c. Damage to ,q?-xuct(,:2s shall,be repaired within, thirty days from,the date of occurre,ZcO d. Doors, fences',-' gw es an similar structures shall be kept in proper operating condition, including ,their locking and latching devices`° 2. iLandscapings trees, shrubs, groundcover,' and irrigation systems':a a. Landscaped areas shall be kept f f.4 from weeds and debris, and maintained in a healthy thriving condition; b. All :plant materials shall recei4e regular maintenance, including but,.not limited to fe_tilizing, p9wing, aqd 1 trimming; - c. Any damaged, dead, - diseased, or decaying plant materials shall be replaced within thirty days,^ wa the date of damages ` A. Irrigation systems shall be kept in proper working order to provide plzoper amount? of water and proper ccverage; and- . v L+ 4� CITY COUNCIL.ORDIN iCE NO. 1tr CA 91-03 CITY 0&F.ANCHO CUCAMONGA is �- page 3 i Al "\ t'\N e. Landscape jscreening materials, such as hedges, shall be rtruned to"maintain their screening ability. 3. `;Parking areas, walkways +tt;ed open splice: a. Shall be kept cliln and free of 3 �)ris, and ems Jai of storage; �i 1 b.` Paved surfa^es;�jshall bey maintained free of potholes, 5roken or raised sections, aYld o•.her' deterioration; - i , �. A c. Outside lighting`flktuies shall be kept in proper working order; i-operative light3 shall be repaired or replaced within thirty .days of damage or £ailurer 4. Tralh enclosures and_refuse`containers: a. Shall'be kept clean, and :he kept flee oS? debris and' y'ites/doors shall be''maintaissed 33`proger working order;"-` h. 'Aecumulaticn of reuse shall not be permitted co exceed the capacity of the refuse containers; S. Graffiti shall be remrved within 72 lv�urs. - 6. Recrearionai facilities==oamoa use areas, amenities, and other site improveme% s shall be maintained in a of Is condition" f2:ee from deteriorations 7.` righting shall be wsiutained ';in, a usable r.,ondition free, from deteriorationt S. Conditions of Approval for a project, imposed in f% conjunction with the Development/Ppsign Review process which set forth requirements for the denalapment of the site, shal3 also be subject to , ongoirg maintenance requirements. SECTION G: This Council minds that; this amendm':At,will not advgirsely affect the environment and hereby'issuas a Negatives?eclaration. SECTION 5: The City Council declares 'chit, 'should any provision, section, paragraph, serterk.s or word of this Ordinance .be rendered or +'declared invalid by any final court action in a court of Yc tent jurisdiction, or by reason of any ,preempttve )ljegivlationr the remaining provisiann, sections, paregraphs,; r2sentences, an w(�rds of this Ordinance shall remwin in fuli force and effect+ .` , Al 4 v CITY COUNCIL'ORDINANCE NO. f DCA 99-03 CITY OF RANCHO CUC.WONGA, C.y Pace. SECTION 6: The Mayor,�shaY,l sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to bA''publiahed '�i�3an Fifteen days ark its pasaa3e at leant once in the Inland Valley 6a31y ,sulletini ai i, wspareex•r of general, circulation pub?ished in the City of "Ontario, Californi.,, ,xnd t circulated in-the City of Rancho Cucamonga,`Californiao i AMC 5 { t r _ �1 { CITE'OF RANCHO CUCA MONGA STAFF REPORT rt ? DATE: , duly 10, 1991 TO: Chairman and Membe::s of the Planning commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner' SUBJECT: ` ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT JUM TENTATIVE TRACT 13S08 'Rbi9 t VACATION OF A PORTION OF FAST AVENUE - LEWIS HOt1ES - A residential subdivision' of 49 "single,family lots an 34.1 acres of land in the ti`ery Low Residential"District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) or' the Etiw-anda Specific Plan, located at'the southwest corner o€ Summit and East Avenues 11 APNs225-18i-Cr4, 06, Oi, 08, 42, and 43 and 225-201_ I 28. Staff recommends issuance of A Negative 1� Declaration. Associated with this project is Tree Removals' Peimti 91-15. (CoD.tinued from June ,12, 1991.) AML I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A:' Ration Requested: Approval of the .bdivision design, ; Ga Cn e�tual Grading Plan, Conceptual 'Landscape plaa, and S7aca ,f0. and issuance of a•Negative Declaration. 3. Prole.,t Density: 1.44 dwellir4 units per acres r t/ C. Tend Use and'Zoni_ng: North - Single family residential, Estate Residential District.,('.1-1 dwelling units per„acre). South Vacant, Single family* recidentials Very .Lox Residential,DistriCt (1-2 dueilir_g units per acre). . Fast Vacant, 5ingZe „°family residential; Very; Tow sdential District 1-2'rdwellin units g pr'ir �tke) West - z-ogle family residential r very 'Low Resin 41ntia District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), "i D. General. Plan Designations: Proa+ct Site— Very Low ",esidential' :. North Very�xov Residential South Very S;l',v Residential U t• East - Ve=s'Low Reb2dential rdest -vyery LOW ReSiOent al ,, J.' t PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORTN 713808 LEWIS HOMES July 10, 1991 \� Page;2 3:. Site Characteristics: The project site is currently'^ac) t'5. with slopes ranging from 3 to 5 percent sloping from -'he north. vegetation`consists,-of several Eucallntus windrows Ond pJ native grass and weeds. II. ANALYSIS: ' A. Background: The project Tract Map is the second development, ` application submitted for subdivision of the project site. on April 1, 1981, -the City, rLouncil approved Tentative Tract. { 11549; a residential.>subdivision of 90 single family lots. On May 4. 1984r)Tract 1154971 recorded, Which,include�f lots of the original subdivision. ,Development- approy s of the remainder ,of,-`the l-�project ,,site expiredc�prior j,o Tract -?rap;. recordation. The },current application j:koviO- for the /// subdivision of that xemai:ling acreage. I B. Genetal: The applicant,is'proposing a.,Tent`�tive Tract Map consisting of a 49-lot subdivision oWith lots ranging in size. f4�m.20,290 square fegt to 36,230 square feet with an'average size of�25,364 square. feet (See Exhibit''`"B"), ;The tract frill provide for through street connections to two adi:'vent rrracts'. Slue Gum Drive will c6nnect ,at the tract', west;., (boundary with Tract 11549-1 and Shoshone Place will connect at the tract's ,forth--boundary with Tract 1'$462. C. bed Review Committee: On July 19, 1990, the,f?;ommittee (McNiel, Weinberger, Coleman) ievies.ed the;project life did not rec-omnend approvalk:hzcause of the following concerns: 1. The lots at the north end of Kincaid Cvurtfhould are redesigned so that no lots' rear-on tiy8u.3t �Avehue The 'Committee directed the appl�l,icant,to .consider modifying the tract design ?ay i:t�sessing � the length of Kincaid Court, possibly Pi c64 the cul-de-sac oulb ;adjacent to the north ,tract bounday.` 2 Ther irtcrsectian s£ _Blue 'Gum Drive and East Aviin�e ;nould`be redesigned with an entry median c treatmid,-t consistent, with Blue Gum Drive and EtiMi�d2s'Avenue. ` ; \V� 3. Th:\�Easi. Avenue wall' should'provide a,1 corner 61 transition wall, consistent with established wall:, " „`designs along East Avenue. Zhis'wilz. provide a -`native ' stone wall, betwee.Y�,Stone piiastersj ' roughly parallel, to the street` corner. li.e �E }i. !f l�' n PLARNING COMMISSION STAFF:REPORT J TT13808 - LEWIS.iOMES I July 10, 1991 ' _ Page 3 1\ 1 corner transition wall,should be provided at the _ southwest corner--o€-Suaffiit Avenue` and East Avenue; _ and at the northwest corner of Blue Gum ,Drive and-` j k�J East Avenue. The-e applicant then: revised the project based upon design recommendations presented by the Committee: on January 17, _ 1991, tie Committee '(McNiel, Vallette, Coleman) ,voviswed modifications to the project design and recommended approval V; of Tract 13808. r 1 f During "taff review and at the Design Review Committea = meeting, specific concerns were f.4-resssd regardin the design 1 of the lots at the nor+_1 end of both Artesian,)Court fund —Kincaid Court. The applicant was directed to design the lots in such a manner that could 'avoid a. potential rear-qII `condition with arl v:u.t3 that will eventually be built on these lots. Thi� direction was irovided, as all other residences adjacent to SuNanit,Avenue between East and Et1wanda Ave`.Sues either. provide--for a fronL'-on or,';Side-on condit-on.. The applicant provided'�:i ex1}ihi c ahowin'Z,how houses could be plotted on these lots aceordingi,,Y, (see Exhibit I.P.I D. Grading Technical Review Committeetr: The project`-°'was reviewed by both Committees and determined, with the recommended conditions of approval, to be in con€armance,:with applicable standards and,.)rdinances.. E. Tr_aUs AdvisnrY Committee: The project was revs 'sd i) the Committee and recommended for approval subject Ito ciartain modifications to "trail locations {see Exhibit "Hw3-. All recommendations of the.Cormmittee have been incorporated by the applicant into the project. The proposed trail locations are shown in Exhibit "G,R F. East Avenue RealignmenttVacaticn, This development will be realigning East Avenue westerly to provide a four-way " intersection with Summit Avenue. The current. East/Summit .intersection has its north and south legs offset approximately 70 feet, The centerline transition, at a Secondary Arterial design speed, requires about 700 feet, which involves` the entire East Avenue frontage between Summit Avenue and Blue Gum Drive. The owner of the "Not a Part" parcel rt the northwest corner of East Avenue, and +Blue Gum Drive has been. strongly opposed to the realignment. ff'The possible use of condemnation^ to obtain offs-site rights-oil- way for the realignment o€ East . Avenva was ccnceptually; adsl\roved by the City Council on May IS, '_198s. � \ r PL&AING COMMISSION STAFF Ry SORT TT19808 - LEWIS BOUrS July 10, 1991 _ Page 4 1 sl In July of 1990, the owner of the "Nat a,'`grt" parcel notified the City-that he would be wi:cling,to rep,*_.ae�the existing structures with a new house orfente!i to the:__ osed tract if the Qity agreed t re.Locate his septic tank, water m ter, anf ' electric services and to waive all fees.. Staff responled,:that an normal relocation costs associax d with the realignment would',be borne by the developer, "including those resulting fzom undemnatian proceedings.` The discussion of fee waivers was deferred until prig. to finalization of the right-of-wry acquisition. 11 Once East Avenue is realigned, the existing'straight pavement section south of Summit Avenue 6d north of Blue Gum Drive . will fSe rimoveC. All eYistingri3ht-of-w_=�( for East Avenue in excess of tha 44 feet mersured from the £kaligned centerline ',will be vacated at thai time. > G. Tree Remove'. Permit 91-15 +*hin projec m t baidaries there (j'are six mature Eucalyptus windrewi�,containing 239 Blue and'REJ'd = Gum Eucalyptus ,gees plus one Wantit tree. Exhibit "C" identr3;es the location of all trees, both living and dead and incv3:ding tree stumps." Aa arborist report was prepared,to address the overall windrow canditir-s ,Two o2' 'the.-`six windrows were not_ addressed,by the r�ck�qist rer ort, 3noluding ik the windrows adjacent to both Summit an,�,,,East Avenue3. The windrow adjacent" to Summit Avenue i�;:; identified for preservation by Figure 5-13 of the Etxwand�;o,St cecif!tc Plan I Sc a' Exhibit "J") and,will be.preserved ?f s w;,ndrow awita.approximately ten(iealthy Eucalyptus t Ee several dead trees =7 and several stumps. The tract is cr' $tioned to camg'ste Community Trail impLovement4:' on the mouth' side of Summit Avenue_ which will''involve both the trak-and the landscaped parkway. Within the Summit Avenue parkway,, Eucalyptus maculate will be planted to infiil spaces 'between-existing' ..Eucalyptus/, trees' to a-1low f)r the rc:establ33i►ment anti perpetuation cf.the k7 41yptus w�dsaw, They'relrla +lment trees consist of Eucalvptt t„ scul;t in 15-gailcm, 53xe�pl�nte'' 8 feet on center�.,, :Shr windrow adjacent to East'AveAne cannot'be preserved. as Eest<Avenue right-of-way improiieaents necessitate its removal. '�The Etiwanna Specific 'P1ar5 cailti for Red.:Gum hltcalyptus., planted 30 feet on center in-a double. row' along the west side of East Avenue. The aTborist rep art e,,aluates: the windrow, condi�don and a (r recommends the preservation Of-53 b dcalyptus trees: The 1 repeTt addresses only theist preservation potential based on, C their condi�ion, not on the desirability` of preserving �"i PLANING COMMISSION STAFF;kEPORT TT13808 -_LEWIS HOMES July 10,` 1991 L:k J Page 5 Eucalyptus trees in prtvate yards. T, a recrmmendat on of preservation is made with no regard for lot„config"tion or street alignment. The location of,most of the 52 trees will 0 conflict directly with the ultimate development of the praje�+ site. thfortunately, most of these. 52 trees are" individt.,A "specimens scattered throughout the site making windrow preservation infeas#iile- Where clusters of trees are,found, or especially defArable specimens, staff recommends preserving f-' - themrpendina design review of those lots. Both`thU Tree Preservation Ordinance:and the Etiwanda Specific Plan allow for the removal of "Eucalyptus windrows with, replacement planting provided as a condition of approddi, '"he' Specific Plan ei�,tablishes a windrow planting requirement,of 50 r l; lineal feet of =iew windrow plantings per project acre. Based upon a project acreage of 34.1 acre`, a total of 1,305 lineal feet of new Eucalyptus windrow will be provided with the development of the tract. The location of required ose�sit�.r(( windrows shall begenerally guided by a,330-foot by a-,660-foot grid pattern. Or.-site windrow plantings,consist of.5-gallon ' size Eucalyptus maculata platted 8 feet on centow. It is apparent that the existing windrows cannot be preserved' Amok or effectively restored under the proposed project, ij th a few exceptions. Staff recommends new windrow plantings' and selective,preserw,\tion as shown in Exhibir'"I" and as required by the conditions�in the attached Resolution. III. ENVIRONMENTAr, ASSESSMENT: Part I of the Initial Study has been v co pleted by the applicant. Staff, has completed Part II of the Ci Environmental Checklist. Both affecte&.?school districts would be \� impacted by this project, hence a condition- requiring participation in a Mello-Roaa funding rdistrict has been Included. In addition, the project proposed the removal of the majority of the on-site Eucalyptus windrows. The arborist's report indicates that only ,20 percent of the trees are H6rthy of preservation. As mitigation, the project will be conditioned to replant the windrows per Stiwanda Specific Plait requirements. r' Therefore, although the project could have a significant effect in these areas,, staff found that there will not be a significant o'rect in this case because of the mitigation measures,which,-bave been included as_ conditions of approval. Staff- recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. IV. FACTS Fo:�`FINDINGS: The, project is consistent with the General Plane `Development Code, and the. Etiwanda Specific Plan. The with the added m t4 elation measures, wi7,12 not be Jdetrimental to the public health or safety or cause,nuisancd�_br,° r � t } PLANNING COMILSSION STAFF REFORT 4 72113808 - LEWIS HOMES -Etuly 10, 1y91 o Page 6 % l significant environmental impacts. In additio:c;�tJ proposed Dite Plan,,, together with t7-ommended Conditions of Approval, is in � com liana with the a p ppAcable provisions of the Development Code,' the Etiwanda,Specific Plang Ua.! City Standards. Jj V. CORRESPONDENCE 1.1wa item has been adveitise�d as a Pubi�C 'ElearSng in the Inland Valley Daily Bv'ilet3nr the.prop ty ha46 been posted, and notices have been sont_to all property owners within 300 feat of the project site. 4 ti VI. RECOi!' tSDATION Staff,, recommends issuance of a Negative_ Declaration and ap,roval of Tentative Tract 13808 through`adoption of the attachedesolutioi;: Respe lly su' dr 4 Brad Huller City'Planner BB:TG:js Ask Attachments: Exhibit "A",. -"Site"Utilization Exhibit "B" - Tact Map ;r Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan E;;hibit "D" - Etniestrian Envelope Plan' Exhibit "E" - Landscape Plan E;<,hiblt "F" - Unit Plotting Example Exhibit>"G" -,Trails Exhibit "H" - Traiks'Advisory Committee Comment Sheet Exhi3c.Y�2�Trees, Eshibi-E� "J" Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure Resolutioolof Approval 1 C= P\ , s u} a\ ill _ t If x 1 ,t im S I _ i y. h � l o e r' JU, 0 1 91 . R �. AGENDA I It " 1 7. i fit. �t 1} •��r*4. 1 .• j � � _ t�i °r4 fit" �`�"`•�,{ °I� ' ,a .YI CITYOF PNdIs tJCtIC3NC r^�a�: [3 PLANWN6 D ION rrr �r N+1�P N M} iI rr:it�i b SCALE: �� }J' J !Ti lf .,. eo ._...^_..,..� - ..�• :1 chi "`o- t t°a , /V ffi ITEM: r, OF RANCji0:-,CUCAMOIJGA 'ri1't.E`� PLA F`1NG-,I7i�`IISION EXHMIrTr. ���SCALE: ,r r� 4j Jt� 3: > 1, t''•� r U -IT.:- T 'i I R rr 1, ...�=i"'y'��" .. to J•� ki � ,� '� �`. qp rs- • _T..�s.Y. , 4 _ • JIB tt ,C yt sTrM Wb- i 33 PLANNING , T� ION 'TI't LE " u EXI ttBrr f3eS��4d.E: �t. _ *;=," _ � � mar' •_ - :-�.� ... Tara r .eow d :� i `• °f 4-+,° t _ 4• � tL r •/ - I Z f.. z f _- } f'_ '=.ep .esMtw.ss�.vrwxa79.eAtptr . — �G�KeI �QPiW . =Wo/el6.YJCA! I•i' a�t�Ka7e¢]Atx'LL'A'A11V p. • i� ... � ACVNYXJee.7Kil. 6•2` M!'1'NRY AaDRtiRY—w Y7.tIPEi. } r �`V # OF CRd-CUCAM,0NGA °rrEnl: YJ PLPi1�M,.L TCT D-MS!�^,N T rm (�t.. EXHIBM SCALE: . k i t Trrris �t.t ~••�7�..-,--fir ' ,__ , '�j �� .y Tres• 3' �� ~rA Y I \g..• :t:: '+ €3F RANC, UCAMONGA TTIZE: &414 _ ]�PLANNING ,,PMSION / EXFIIBiT: V��IISCA'S.E: rim 7ji _ r a } L' Itz t OF UCAMONGA TI'd'LE:G PLANT ING l'bMSION ►s , ---- N EXHIBIT: STALE: ��3 1:. I r f 1 d I I� I j ag .I"I'Y �a. ITEM: 1 I OF w UCAMONGA TITI,E: cl'kY► PI-A.NNIi DWISION r EXHIBIT: I SCALE: F, ti �--- - �i f�s'..�= i � Via.,. {1 Q•.� � 71 ®F RCtG �UCElMONGA TTEM: TULE: l PLANNING=:E)MSJ'LON �+ U EXHIB Va SCALE: ! M ( t ! ♦h � x ! '_' 'a"'17.t£B Taber • �'� _; � [L. •'t L !•, _ t±: .4 f :1l�k,�:��. f.sir . I Ib � ��" 1d��R1r�S e_F� .i�f�•..'.v�, _-' i�.l I K - C'1 MY OF FTCI-�' UCAPVIfONC� I CEi41: J `< Aftk PLtlil NINE-I� lISICDN TEE` t `fit'.. t EXHIBIT: };"uAL i tw, ` • •1, COWS .� l s ri l_ l PUNT PALETTE - naq.0 OF YsIY�.Pn.� I [wfOOOYtia N aOfRTCOYGf-n trnc.o..uTJ. � _ aanlc[.u.Ryan � ,• €� uCoNoa� ,ITEM rr : 1 �r uvt SION 1`TTVLE. Ur, ti r EXHIBTI`: SCALD: "", 1 41 t t, l�l ��•.t: e" t t C�I?T7Y''�Y3' �'-��'l�l `� '1�7 DO MY 1rJs1(77f7� C� �c // (3 CITY OF CffGl',CUCAMONGA PLANNING-16 ION TrrLE' �t �i, EXHIBIT: °l.SCALE: L : a S 3 54� c N ITENri OF RAKCW,-,�UC M-1,0 9GA PLAN�t7iNG I 7ISTOl�7 TTTLE U N }- J� Al EXHIBIT': SCALE: �' ; ..... or® GQ +I t EAST AWWJK r - --.'.f'"-..• .ry ;.l- ) NEIGHOORHOOD ENTRY - .... q.t QOM!I7fdTY ENTNY -•.r {( WRWROW PLACEMENT •" j7, EasrArc .�. LOCAL.STREETSCAFE —f[i r K» tiq }� EAST AYEWMA SITAXTSCAM 4:z s� CrrY of RAiTC1C ; UCAMOGA rrEm: . TrrL.E:& , N PLANNING .Dm-Isl N u p EXH[Brr: L,4 SCALE: �l K. . :.t ,I � • 1. .. lye a• -�r-; ♦ M ;I i I� � Y 1 Mph. _ �' ••� A =, � ' � t .tip �`•' i� y � i *to F4ti { ;`'�111j111lljll+ ' s .. WPC 1. DltY[ + r ITEM: OF AAWC06,`CUCAMONGA PLANNING-DIASION 'bTI3.Ec 1K 14 EXFi.Tl !T': SCA E: �� t' MJMOvfYU dOYYi1GND � ,5 ^ �� ; . lM� ^ t- JS 1 •> ----- 1-7 .. gg 1 to it M_li r_----� =fir" :r L-i TRAILS ADVISORY COWITTEE COMMENT SHEET Project Descrikion: Tentative Tract 13808 Lewis Homes - A resi en is su tvision of 49 sinfle family lots on 34.1' acres of ;and located,at the southwest corner of Summit Avenue and East Avenue. ` Comments: 1. Twenty foot community trails are proposed along the north, south and west boundaries of the tract consistent with tfie, 'Ceneral Plan. 2. A fifteen foot local Trail is proposed from the community trail at the north tract boundary to Blue Gum Drive and from Winchester Court to �,ihe proposed community trail along the south tract boundary. 3. An eighteen foot trail easement �s locatevid in an east/west ' direction as part of the bordering .Tract 12462 north of Stone Castle Court. This trail would connect- with the proposed north/south community trail which crosses Blue Gum D,Aive and connects with the north/south local trail ease of Shoshone Place. 4. A fifteen foot 'wide local trail is proposed acrossStone Castle Court for access to Lots 20 and 21 froni� '"=e community trails. 5. A fifteen foot wide trail easement i +--'used from Winchester Court along the rear of lots ene through... - `to a_variable width equestrian and landscape easement along tre- t.rst side of the new alignment of East Avenue Action: _ 1. Community trails should be constructed as proposed along the north and south tract boundaries from the past boundary of tract 1c462 'Lo 'East Avenue and from Summit, along the 'west tract boundary, continuing south between Lots .14 and 15, to the community trail atthe southerly tract boundary. 2. The lo;:al trail between Lots 11 and 12,, 20 and 21 and between Lots. 25 and 26 should be deleted. 3. North/Sevth local trails should be provided at the rear of the 1 oLa`bet 4en Kincaid Court and Artesian Court.and,between Shoshone Place and Stone Castle Court. `' The later trail would continue across Drive between, Lots ,1-7 and 18 to the comMunity, trai?' juth tract boundary. 4. A 1ac11 trail should:be provided at the rd".`r of Lets Y through 8.- H;r fr,v kip n6,.,-�ter° Court to East Avenue. �fl O. I _ 5. An additional local 'trail should be provedk aging the rP�roi ` Lots 9 and 10-behi nG the East Avenue wall, ont -cti ng the,'T obal trail at the rear of lots. 1 through 8 with *he��co�tinunity trail at I; the southern trace: boundary: 6. An additional local trail should be located between Lots 2 and 3 'connecting the trail at the rear of Lots 1- through 8 with Blue`Gum Drive and the north/seuth,,traii b'ett Vhcaid Court and Artesian � 1 Court.; 7. A local trail should be con struL�_ed behind the East Avenue wail at the rear of Lots 47 through 49, '�rorth of the'"not'a part" existing ICI lot, to the proposed'cornnunity trail' at _Summit Avenue. 8 An additional M foot-wide trail easement'shodlld 'be provided along the south side of the proposed i8 foot ea e�` Wt the, 'south zll boundary of Trac 12462. E =_� 9. An additional 15 bt ride trail easement,shoulid be provided, at the rear of Lox %t,; ihrough 22'-foilotii'ng the westerly• tract boundary, to Drive,; along .the .side of Let 20 adjacgnt to Blue Gum Dri�uzr,` zbrni ng south -al ong the west side of 'Lot °19 4. r connecting t.._ addi'ftdnal 12 foot easement at south si.ge of tract 12462 with the ;onmunity trail at the,south tract brUZdary. 10. Trail fencing should not be installed at,`the 6utside portion of trails>abutt sq:. exisi-ing or proposed trails in ardee to, prevept „split trails" 11. Local trails„should be left' open at,coni ections with streets for'` equestrian se'r'vice access. 12. Houses should be seOzck a minimum distance of 10 .feet from trails occurring at Zide 13. All trails should be constructed according to City standards. � ' .1 i •'�`� L08f1'ON lOWi 'dYW S3itLLY3iMiLLVN ' i �: 51 L:2 '4 Z If ANION i 1l �� 24 nt srnr / CpYA i# ie� am F5fifiAMZ AVE _S M O EXISTING STREET EEs 0 BE PlR2Se1VED n Existing Win0br43ake Existing Tres /" it�lc OainP ,.j Foothill bled S.P. i/ Ofd1nanes 424,Effective 10/19/90 figure', 13 �i PRESERVATiON CITY OF` D�1�f OUCAM09G LTE1H: f '' PLAII�NIN(' ;L MSIOIV T '�-E- ' EXmrr: SCALE: q "ab 001TV our DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AMA DIT ,gqf 3 TA NN D A IN vim D' C 0 N" PROJECT#: �C/ SUBJECT; y, U r�k�) APPLICANT:. to LOCATION: I � Those items checked are Conditions oj,'Approvai. APPLIZANT SHALL CONTACTINE.RLANNING DIVISION',(714)989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits, _ ,i ,>kte s. Approval shall expire,unless extended by the Planning Commission,it building pemr;ts are not'issuedor approved use has not commenceUwithin 24 months frgmthe date ofapproval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to I 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subjoct to the approval of f 4. The developershatleommen e,paf icpatein,aridconsuml►ateorausetobeicommenced, participated in,or consummated,a Mello-Floos Commnky Facilities District(CFD)for the Ranch:/,Cucamonga Fire Protection D �to finance cor andlor maintenance of a fire station to serve the dsvelopmerr[: Tie station shall be located, ted,designed,and built to all sperittcatiors of the Rancho Cucamol Fire Protection District,and shall become the District's proahy upon completion. TtIv equipment shalt be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any 5, 3641 of a Station,the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations.The 661)shah be formed by the District and the developer by the tine recordation of the final mac oars. _e 5. Prior to recordation of the final map oi'the Issuance if bufid ft perrift, Whichever comes 4 fire-the applicant shall consent to, 4r participate in,the e8tablishment of a Mello-Roo:, Community Facilities District for tha;constnxtitin and maintgrism of necessary school r` fadliles. However,9 arty school district has previously establlahed such a Community Facilities District,the applicant shall,','I in the alternative,consent to the annexation of the k project site into the territory Of Such ezlatirq Disw-" , icrto the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits,whichever comes first.Further,it the affected school district has not formed a M8110-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the d?ie of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of hd0dlnd Pemats for said project,this condition shall be deemed.null and void. sC-2/9t IofI2 C�nylc�on Due This condition shall be wafved'd the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is --J--J— involved,written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such;otter must have been issued by the water - district within 90 days prior to final map approval inthe case of subdivision orpriorto issuance of permits in the case of all other residential.projects. B.Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program, and grading on file in the Pi ing D sIon,thelconditions contained herein, :t Development Code regulations,and Specfiic Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity bc,; commenced thereon, all Conditons of Approval shall be completed to.,ttr+satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facility shall notcommence until such time as all Uniforrn Building Code and J_J_ State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Priorto occupancy,plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The'buildir g shall be Inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations Incorporating all Conditions of Approval Shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building pemrlts.' 5. Ail she,grading,landscape,irrigation,and stroet Improvement plans shall be coordinated for J consistency prorto issuance of any permits(such as grading tree removal,encroachment, building,etc.),or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whlchever comes first 6. Approval of this reheat shall not waive compliance with all section s,of the Devoiopmsnt' Code.all other .-siicable City Ordinances,and Community Plans or Specific Plans in effectr'at ttie time of Building Perk ls3uar44. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be revjtweviad ah� pioved by the City Plarimar and Sheriff's Department(989-6611)prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style,Illumination,location-,helhv�a;and method of shielding so as riot to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralfaed trash receptacles are provided,all trash *-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shleldod from public view. 9. Trash receptacles)are required and ilW m)et City Standard& The final design.locations,and Site number of trash receptacles shall ifs subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 10.All grnund-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers.AC condensers,etc.,shall --J---J—Aft be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of t concrete or masonry walls, berming, andfor.1i�ndscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. S SC,2/01 2 of 12 ca„a.tion Ntg, 11.Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with Adak the adopted Street Naming Policy,,, i r to approval of the final map; 12.All building 4 Vers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _J including aR„ 4umination. 1--" 13.A detailed plan indicating trail widths,maximum slopes,physical conditions,fencing,and _lam weed control,in accordance with City Master Trail drawings,shall be submitted for City Planner reviewand approval priorto approval and rece,,dafionof the FinalTract Mapand prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans.Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails,including fencing and drainage devices,in conjunction with street improvements. +4.The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions(CC&Rs)shall notprohroit the keeping ofequine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met.Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners'associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15.The Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions(CC&Rs) and Articles of incorporation of the Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney.They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map,.pr prior to the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16.All parkways,open areas,aW landscaping shall bepemtanontlymaintained b lhepropsrty --J____/r, owner, homeowners`association,or other means aoceptable to the City. Prof of this t landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. _.-1-e 17.Solar access easements shall be defeated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or -!J dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots orunits for use of a solar energy system.The easement t may be contained In a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits,whichever copes first.The easements shoil prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation,structures'Yflictures or any other object,except for utility wires and simit_9;,objects,pursuamt.,to Development Code Section 17.08.060•G-2. 18.The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and --J-l— maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Pe[m*No. . Any further modiiic�to the site including,but not limited to,exterior alterations and/or interior alteratlonswhichadfeathe exteriorotthe buildings or structures,removal of landmark trees,demolition,relocation,reconstruction of buildings or structures,orchanges to the site, shall require a modification-the Historic Landmark X..dration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building sign i i, 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units --J—1 and for heating any swimming pool or spa,unless other alternative energy system are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and off iciency.All swirnming pools installed at the time of Initial daveloprnant shah be supplernentecd with solar heating. Details shall los included in the building plans and shall be smbmitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural -!_J— treatment,detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to"City Planner review arm approval prior to issuance of buiitdding permits. - sc-2!9 t 3 of 12 - Pmiecy Xo.eUlm --3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners'Association shall be submittedior City Planner and Building Qfrrclal review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All rout appurtenances,including.airconditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_1_ _ projections,shall, eshieided from Vlaw and the sound bu#fereO O 4jacentpropd—kU 3nd streets as requxed by the Planning Division.'Such screening swill be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfactiori,pf the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and vehicular Accsss(fndicate,details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6feet and shall ._./__J_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall(including curb), 2. Textured pedestrian pathways art textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be r—/-- providedthroughoutthe developmentto connect dwelftsluniislbuiidingswithopen spac9s/ plaxas/necreationa4 uses. 3. All parking spar:4, sha►t be double striped per Cily standards and all driveway`aisles, entrances,and exft,�t shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be pro girded v?ri garage door openers H driveways are less than 18 feet in J_1 depth.i„.�..,ack of sidewalk 5. The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict thestorage of recreational vehicles --�--/ on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit - parking on interior circulation aisles other than in'designated visfforparking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submsted for the City Planner, Cry' Engineer,andu' _J_/_ ANIL Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval pdrorto�`steattce of buildup permits. \ / S. Landscaping(for publicly tmaintalmW landscape areas,refer t®Stolen N.) 1. A detailed landscape and irrig2tionn,,,-r4ludi tgslopeplantingandmodelhome landscap- J.—/_ ing in the case of residenrral devabpment, shall be preparad by a licensed landscape architW and subnfted for City Planner revi3wand approval prbrto the issuance of building permhs or prior final map approval In the case of a custorn lot subdivision. _ 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be pmtectedwith aoonstruction barrier eJ_J in a=rdar=withthe Muni*W Code Section 19.08.110.and sonotedonthe grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new bcatlons for transplanted trees shall be shown or.!he detailed landscape plans.The applicatt shall follow all of the arboriers recom=ndsibns i.I'%aWN preservation,transplanting and trimming methods. 3. rwminirrrrcinof % treespergrossa=.Comprtsedoftttefolbwir+gsizes.v,Mllbepmvlded within the project: %-48-inch box or larger, %-36-inch box or larger, `\ %-24-Inch bolt or larger,—%-15-gallon,and %-5 gallon. ; 4. A ntfnirrnrm of 96 of trees planted wMiln'A;3 project shag be specimen size trees- _4__J 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three Jam_ parking stalls,sufficient to shade 5W*of the parking area 91 solar noon on August 21 I o � 3� SC-2/91 4 or t2 r . - Completion Due-Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per30 linear feet of building. .). —J- 7. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of5:1 orgreaterslope,but less than J 2:1 slope,shall be,of minimum,irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a'pemranentIrrigation system to be,installed by the developer prior to occupancy. _8. All private slopes in excess of 3 feet,but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 orgreater --�—� slope shall be lar.dsc"d and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows:one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.ft.ofs:ope area,1-gal Ion or larger size shrub per each 100 sq.ft.of slope area,and appropriate ground cover.In addition.,slope banks in excess of afeet in vertical height and of 21 oroiiater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq.ft.of slope!ma.Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane.:Slope planting required by this _ section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed bythe developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development,all slope planting anwnigation shall tae oontinu- rl�� ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by, de irperuntA each Individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer.Priortoreleasi oO'Cupans�forftse units,aninspeetion shall be conducted by the Planning Division to deterrninei a►sfney are in satisfactory condition. X{ 10.For multi-family residential and non-residential development,p rperty owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site,as well as contiguous planned areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall.be kept free from weeds and debris and-tnalydained In a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive, regular pruning, fertilizing, mooring, and trimming. Arty damaged, dead, diseased,'or AOL decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11-Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or J_J This requirement shall the in addi'.ion to the required street trees and slops planting. 12.The/final design of the perimeter parkways,walls,landscaping,and sidewalks shall be included in the required larfdscape plant;and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval andcoordinatodforootisistencywkhanypa"-ay lands apkgpianwhichmaybe required by the Engineering Division. 13.Special landscape features such as mounding,aRuviai rock,specimen size trees,meander- ing sidewalks(with hcrfzontaf change),and intensified landscaping,Is reoukedd-ong 14.Landscaping and irrigation sytistems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimater of this prom area shell be cordh ou*maintained by developer. IS.All walls snalibe providledwithdecorall"treatment.If located in pubk maintenance areas, —J--J— the design shall be coordinated with the Engkteering Divsiorn. _a 16.Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and sub rMed''for City plannrrr review and —!J— approval prbr to issuanco of txndding permits. Those criteria shall encourage the natural growth charactedstrxsaf the selected tree specs. 17.Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve wafer through the principles of _J� Xedscape a3 defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. S�•2191 5or12 F.Sign3 C,;,,pleum Dui- 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not apart of thisapproval. t. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall - require separate application and approval bythe Planning Division priorto installation of any signs. 2.A Uniform S196,Program for this devalopment shall be submitted for City Planner reviewand J—/_ apprrrai prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monumentsign(s)shall be provided for apartment,condor,inium,ortownhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and apj,*�val by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.Environme.-la! \ 1. The developersho!l provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as dete+minodby the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on anyproperty. 2. The developer shall provide=eacri prospective buyer wrfften'��tice of the City Adopted —�--f— Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer._ shall provide each y y p prospective buyer carmen n:;,�of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Plannerreviewand approval prior to the Jam_ - ' issuandv of building permits. The final report shah discuss the level of Interior noise attenuation tobelow45CNEL,the building matetiaisand construction techniques provided, and it appropriate,verify the adequacy of the m.Mtgation measures.The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H.Other Agencies t. Emergency secondary access shall bebY n-4edlftaccordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire —J--J Protection District Standards. ,-0' 2. Emergency access Shall be provided,maintenance free and clear,a minimum of26 feet Wide —J—J— at all times during construction in accordance with Rarcho Cucamarga Fire Protection / district requirements. 3. Prior to Issuance of bulk&V perrruts for combustible construction, evidence shall be —/:' —, submiltedto the Rancoho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection.Is available,pending compietion of required fire protection system. 4. The applicant shah contact the U.S.Postal Service to deterrnft the ape--- mire and location of mail boxes.Mufti-family residential developments shad overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate hgtrting.The final location 0 n. poxes and the design of the overhead structure shah be subject to City Planner lve u1d approval prior to the issuance of building permits. S. For projects us`mg septic tank facilities,written certification of acceptability,including all -�-- Am supportive information,shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department or Environmerdal Health and submitted to the Bvi ding Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tar*Permits,and prior to issuance of building mwts. 8 of t2 sc-2/91 'r' I l El s Tf 1Y100 APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: .Site Development / 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Buiklrig Code,Ur-orm Mechani- --J--- r— cal .ode,Uniform Plumbing Code,National Electric Code,and all other applicable codes, " ordinances,and regulations in effect at the fire of!&wanes of relative perrnits. Please % contact the Building and Safety Divisior. for copies of the Cone Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts: _ 2. Prior to issuance of buikiinc,permits for a new residential dwelling unk(s)or major addition --�--� to existing unft(s),the appil,,,M shall piiy developmentfses at the established rate.Suchfees may include,but are not limited to:City Beautification Fee,Park Fee.Drainage Fee,Systems Development Fee,Permit and Plan Checking Fees,and School Fees. k; I - 3.Prior to{issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or additionito an existing development,the applicant shaft pay developments fees at the establist"rate.Such fees may Include,but are not limited to:Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee,School Fees,Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4. Street addresses shall be providedbytheSulI ding Official,aftertract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits., J.Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use,area.and tire-resistiveness of existing buildings. it 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for --�—� the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing selvage disposal facliitles shall be lamovsd,filled andforcapped to comply with the J_1 Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Bonding Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for building permit application. ,> K.Gradinit It 1. Grading of the wZymx property shall be in accordance with the Unilorm Building Code,City -�-J Grading Standards.and armed grading practices.The firmed f+rad rmp plan shall be in sub3tardW conformance with fti approved WWIng per• 2. A soils report sW be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to —J—J— peNorm such work. r1 3. The development Is located within tti,soil erosion control boundaries,a Soil Disturbance LJ_J_ Permit is required.Please contact San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture at(714) 387-2111 for emit pe application.Documentation ofsuch pemmit shalt be submitted totheCoy 1 prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at `-J-1 the tini�nf_�licatlon for grading plan check: r ` 5. The final grading plans shall bocamnpleted and approved priorto Issuance of building permit s. `,.j J p SC-2/9 t 7 0f 12 / �gC' ppleaoa Da[et 6. As a custom-lot subdivision,the following requirements shall be met: a.Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all en-site —�-1 drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priarto tin at Map approval and priorto the Issuance of grading permits, >> b.Appropriate casements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted ortto --�—� or over adjacent parcels,are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to Issuance of grading and building permits. c.On-site drainage improvements;necessary for ddivatering and protecting the subdivided l' properties,are to be installed prior to issuance of build?t permits forc construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving,or within a parcel relative to which a building perrAd is requested. d.Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval priorto issuance of building and grading permits.(This may be on an Incremental or composite basis. e.All slope banks in excess of 5 feet In vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover forerosioncontrat uponcompleWnof grading orsomeother alternative method of erosion control shall becompl6l*C tthe satisfaction of jib Building Official.In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This k'-pirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope -.icing requirements of Section 17.08.0401 of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714)989.1�%MJ;pR(ppMLIANCE WITH THE FALLOWING CONDIIIMNS: L DedlMlon and Vshicular Access,, 1.Rights-W-way and easements shah be dedicated to the City for as interior public streets, _J_l community trails.pubis paseos,public landsc2^9 areas,street trees,and public drainage facilities as shown ct ' ,plans and/or tentalbm snap. Private easements for non-public facilities(cross-lot cliiaaS e,local feeder trails,etc.)shag be reserved as shown on the plans arxlortentaWs map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of way on the perimeter streets (measured from strPot centering): _total feet on _ total feet on total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for foot wide naadwayIswentent shall bemade for all private streets or drives. / 4. Non-vehicular axessha'bededic tfre City for ft lfolfrwird streets: 11� 5. Reciprocal.ac ces5 easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs _J_1 or by deeds and shall be recopied concurrently whh the map or prior to the Issuance of building pe-nits,where no map is involved. SC-2/91 8 of 12 PMIM NO 6.. Private drainage easements forcross-lot drainage shall be provided andshallbe delineated or noted on the final map. 1._J_ T The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-for;minimum building restriction area on file J-_/_ r, neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: TWe hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the tight to prohibit the construction of(resklenttaf)buildings(or other structures)within those areas designated on the map as buikf:ng restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent M through the / CCSR's. �" S. All existing easements lying within futurerights-ot-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on the final map, ; 9. Easements for public sidewalks andfor street trees placed outside the public right-of-way I shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto privat.1,property, 10.Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes.to provide a minimum _J_J_, of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs.if curb adjacerd sidewak Is used along the right / turn lane,a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. f 11.The developershall make a good falth effort to acquire tho required off-she pio-Oerty interests _ ____J_ necessary to construct the required public Improvements,and if he/she shculdfail to do so, the developer shall,at 14ast 120 day.elr r to submittal of the final map for approval,enter into an agreement to complete the imry rc 6;nents pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the propeiy interests required fortheImprovements. AMIL Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developerof all costs trwiried by the City 4o acquire the off-site property interests required In connec donwiththe subdivision.Security for a portion of these costssn;lii be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer,at developer's cost.The appraiser shall have been approved by the city prior to commencement.of the anaralsal; M.Street Improvemantsr / 1. All'public improverOnts(interior streets,drainage facilities,communkytralls,paseos. landscaped areas,etc.)shown on the plans andfar tentative map shO be constructedto City Standards. interior street irnprovements shall includs,but are not limited to,curb and gutter,AC pavement,drive apprrach0s,sidewalks,street lights,and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26-toot wide pavement,within a Flo-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be !/ constructed forall half-section streets. 3. Construct the fo"RV petit%1dr street im ovemeh;o including,but not iimltedto: PSMTREE,TINAM CURB Q' AC- SIDE Dam S WIMM 01,11 ER PVMi WALK AFM I ORM TREES 3tiAII tSIANt9 � R lid I i7 SC-2/91 R:oC �,31J1 _i Pmw tine Candetim Ds'V,... Notes:,(a)Median Island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)Pavement reconstnmtion and overlays will be determinerkduring plan.check. (c)It so marked,side- walk shall be curvilinear perSTp,3d4. (d):so'm2rksd,aq ,,Ifeu of construction ae shalt AEk be provided for this item. i r 4. Improvement plans and construction.' j a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights,prepared by aregis- tered Civil Engineer,shalt be submitted to and approved by tine City Engineer.Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction ofthe City Engineer and the City Attorney guananteeing completion of the public arbor private-street Improve- ments,priorto final map approvatortheissuanceotbuildingperm8s,wfiichaveroccors first: b. Prior to any work being performed in public rlght-of-way,fees shall be paid and a --J�_-/Y- constructions permit shall be obtainers from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any otter permits required. C. Pavement striping,marking,traffic,street name signing,and interconnect conduit ehail be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal oonduitwP,h pull boxes shall beinstaliedon any newconstructioiebrreconstruction of major,secondary or collector streets which Intersect with other major,secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals.Pull boxes shall be pieced on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR.,7FCR orany atherioccations approved by the City Engineer. ' Notes: Ask (1)Ail pull boxets shall be No.6 unless.otherwise specified by the City Engineer.(2)Condui4 shallbe 3-1 rich galvanized steel with puliropa. _: e. Wheel chair ramps shall be Installed on 09 four corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. F-Asting City roads requirkV construction sW remain men t%traffic et all times yvlth - r--�— adequate detours during con8truction.Astreetciasure'permit May be required.Acash deposit shall be probded to cover the cost of trading and paving, enrich stall be refunded upon comptation of the consmi tionto the saitsfactW of the City Engineer. a. C-s,v4ntraiteddraitiapa flows shaNcrcil=utidewaAs.UrdersidewalkdWrls shall be {� installed to City Standards,excepi fo.'eingie fancily lots. j h. Handicap acres,,ramp design shall W as specified by the City+Er"er. i. StWt nanM SW be Mpoved by the CltyPlannerpricrtQa tRatibrfirstplan-.he(*. _..1_J- 5.Street irwavernontt plans W City Standards for as private streets sttat;be provided for �J_J review and approve,by the City Sn limr. Prior to any work being perfomtied on isle pn- vale streets, tees shall be paid aid dvntxirts bn porn-As sly be obtained from the City � J Engineers Office in addltlnn to.any other permits reWited. (, Ii _&.Street trees,a minimum of 15-gallon size or largos,shag be Installed per CRY Standards if �1 _!, accordance with►he City's street tree program. SC-2/91 10 of 12 ai _ 7.Intersection line of site designs shall be revier':adbythe City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. t, a. Oncoilec!or or larger streets,lines of sight shall be plotted for all project Intersections,'' J—J -`" including drivvrays.Walls,signs,and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Lartiscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall us approved by the City Engineer. b Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeabilify improved,usually by —J--/— moving9.9 2+/-closest streottrees on each side away fromthe street and placed in a street ,r tree easement. B.A p; t R ail b obained rom pA'LTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: zA 9.All public improvements on the following.rltreets shall operationally complete prior to the --�°--1 issuance of building permits:: , _ 1� ki N.Public Maintenance Arena S 1.A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards --� shall be submitted to the Clty Engineer for review'and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.The follmging landscape parkways, medians,paseos,easements, traits,or other areas are requires;to be annexed into the L e Mal enance Disi kill, 164 QL X hit, t:94 ft, wkom the t . ('%VA 2.A signed consent and waiverform to join andforform the apptapriato Landscape and Lighting _J—J_ Districts shall be filed with fhsCity Engineer orlorto final map approval orissuanceof building permits whichever occurs first.Forrnatlon casts shall be b;`ime by the.developer. �3.All required public iandscaping and Irrigation systerm shall be continuously maintained bythe --J--J— develop©r until accepted by the City. 4.Parkway tandscaping on the following streets)shall conform to the results of the respective _J_I Beautification Master Plan: ®.Drainage and FIbrj Control f�d� 1. The project(or portions therwq is located wfthin a loud Efaxard gone;therefore,food --/—J— protection measures shag be provided o c erteted by a registered CIA Engineer aAS ` apMved by the City Engineer. 2.It shall be the developer's responsipitify to have the carrels FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The developer's englimef shall prepare all necessary reports,plans,and hydrotogicilydraull calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR)shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichevero urs ft.A Letter of Mai RevrMon(LOMR)shall be issued by FEMA prier to occupancy or Iniprove7iW accap ce,wrfatohever occurs first. i y 3.A f ruil drainage study shall be submitted to V 4 approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of bulidinj permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage 'acilitles shall be instal!ed,as required by the City Engif*er. SC-2/9 t 11 of 12 -�•�l<- Qmnigtiun Date: .,-,' d.A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within da right-of-%vag,4, S.Trees are prohibRad within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any pu5lfa storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a matures ;frank. r ,j'to convey overflows Irmo event of a —�=J s,Public stomn'drain easements sharp bt�� y bloc a,a in sump catch.h2sirron the c street. P.Utilities 1.Provide separate utility services to each parcel.including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas,electric poorer,telephone,and cable IV(all underground)in accordance with'-the Utility Standards.Easements sha:'be provided as required. ` r 2-The developer shall be responsible for the retocatlon of existing utilities as necessary. 3—Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the — --� Cucamonga County Water District(CCWD).-Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection 01strict, _ and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino.A letter,)f ' complianca from the rCWD is requiredprio�to final map approval or Issuance of,pam9its,' whichever occurs irrst. , Q•General Requirements tad Approvals i 1.The separate pzmels:t:ontained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into —J one parcel priortn issuance of buking permits. 2.An easement for a joint use driveway,shalt be provided prior to final heap aW'd6v,:,l or =!_J i Issuance of building permits,whYheveroccurs first,for: _ 3.Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be pasted with the City'c9veringthe estimated cost of apportioning 14 assess6enfs underA ssmern Dia-I tz<i among the rawly created parcels' Efiwanda/San Sev:',�e Area Regional Mainline,Secondary Regional,and Mastar Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid priori,final mats approval or prior to building permit Issuance_N no map is Involved. 5.PerrOds shall be obtained from the following agencies for work i tzt their right-04ay: 6.A signed consent and walvelr form to ioln andfor font the Law t-orcermirt Commatnity J J Facilities Oiatrdt8 shy be filed with the City Engineer prior to;final map approval or the issuance of budding peraft,whichever occurs first.Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 7. Prior to finalization of any devebpmem;phase,sufficient improtnam®nrplans sW he com- el—J— pieted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary mess and drainaga protectionto the satisfaction of the Cky Engineer.Phase boundaries shall'cc,n:espond to lot IjtY ;,-Wn an the approved tentative map. n. I 12of12 t RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTIOW OF THE'PLANNING COMMISSICw-`�OF cTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE.TRACT MAP N0. 13808, RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO._91-15,`AND THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF'EAST AVENUE, A RESIDENT31L SUBDIVISION OF 49 SINGLE; FAI4ILY„LOTS ON 34.1 ACRES"-" LARD` LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST C�RNER OF SUMMIT AND EAST AVENUES IN THE :'VERY LAW RESIDENTIAL, DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC.pLA1; AND MAILING FINDINGS; IN SUPPORT,THEREOF APN: 225-181-04, 06, 07, 08, 42 and'i!3 -;k.ad'225-201-2H. G A. Recitals. (3) Lewis "Homes ;has, -filed an application for the ' approval of Tentative Tract MaPL No. 1380& as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in nthis ;Resolution, the subject Tentative,Tract Map "request is referred to as the Application." \� " Ui) On the loth of July 1991, the Planning Coamsiwsionfof the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted..a duly noticed,`public hearing"on the,`dpplicat'ion and concluded Paid hearing cn that'.date• (iii) All legal prerequiaites prior to the adoption Lof this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and reselv2d by the -; Plannir' ;Conm<ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: li 1., This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the.f4cts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. i 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commissionduring the abova-referenced public hearing on July 10, 1991, including written and oral staf-.reports, together with public,testimony, 'this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Summit an(V East Avenues, with a street frontage of '825 feet along Summit Avenue and a street frontage o£ 1,181 feet along East Avenue, and is presently vacantt and (b) The property, to the north of, the site contains single family Lhomes, to the south are single'family .nomes and vacant property, to the east are single family homes and vacant property, and to the west are single family ha,,,as and homes under canstruetion} and z ,PLANNING COMMISSION RPSOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE;TRACT 1380E LE-vils HOMES July 11, 1991 r Page 2 1'} a (c) The proposal to de-. lop 49, single family units on 34.f acres of land is consistent with, the Very Low land use designation 'of, the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence`presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public,-hearing and upon, the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs '1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: - (a) That tentat=ve tract and vacation of' a portion of East venue are consistent wt-th the General' Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract are consistent with the General Plan, Development„Coil:, and,specific plans; and (c;) The site is;physically"sui;table for the typi of development proposed; ands (d) The ;design,,of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or thA;ir habitat; and " (e) The tentative tract is 'not likely to cause serious public health prob:ems; and M The design :of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access - through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission her�ehy finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and is considered in compliance _,with the California Environmental Quality Act of ?97U and, further, this Co mission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Hared upon the findings end conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,11 this Commission hereby approves the application subject' to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Divisio;t: 1) The per4eter wall adjacent to Summit Avenue shall` be}\designed'compatible with the existing _ wall direi:tly to the west (Tract 12462). The "-- wall design.'shall be 'shown on the Landscape and Irrigation'Plan and shall be subject to City Plannerr review and approval prior to`issuance of building permits. PLANNr..4G COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13808 LEw.TS HOMES July;10, 1991 Page 3 2) The design of the 'ast Avenua wall shall be >� consistent with Figure 5-23A^af the Etiwanda Specific'Plan.',,_, The wall designl��/ ' shall be she on the Landscape, and Irrigation Plan and shall be subject to City Planner, r_view and-approval l\ prior to issuance of building permits. r, i 3) Tree Removal Permit 91-15, is hereby.approved for the removal of all; tress, including stumps, on the project site,;�;mcept thoe; trees g described below. L a) The existiina, windrow along Summit',Avenue, ate shall be preserved per Figure 5-13 of the Etiwanda ;Specific Plan ;and in accordarce with Rtancho o Cucamonga Municipal Code Sectionli9.08. - b) The :following trees ider;/Ified in the arborist reports shall be preserved in place- . Tree # Tract In in Arborist Report Lot # 2; 35 4 41 91 10 30 ,; 12,',13 15,;,16 17 18 19, 20 26 21, 22 j 37 32 32-45 2 46-52 f0 4) Tree Removal Permit 91-15 shall be valyd for a period of 90` days, subject to extension by the City Planner. The 90 days shall start from the date of isuuanae of-rough grading permits. r�5) New on-site windrow planting shall be provided at a rate of 50 lineal feet per acre. Based'or , a project of 34.j acres, a minimum of 705 lineal feet of on-site Eucalyptus windrow Jdhall be provided. The location of required on-site a windrows :shall be in 'accordance with i)Exhibit "I" of the June 12,, 1991,: Planning `Coamission staff report. On-site windrow plantings shall PLANNING C)M.MISSION RESOLUTION NO'. TENTATIVE TRACT 13008 - LEWIS HOMES July 10, 1991 Page A \: AM consist of Eucalyptus macLilata in 5-gallon size v �t planted 8, feet on center.,, On-site windrows (JJ1 shall-be shown on the Landscape and Irrigation Plan and shall be suLjject to City Planner review and approval prior to building permit issuance. New planting shall be;,comp:eted prior to occupancy. 6) Eucalyptus maculata shall be; planted in the Summit Avenue parkway to infill spaces between existing bucalyptus trees. stumps ;shall be removed. The: replacement trees` shall Se 'a minimum '15-gallon size planted 8 ' feet on r? center* ' The trees shall be shown,on'the"Street ;1 Improvement P!�_-rrs and shall be subject to City (1 Planner and City,Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of any permits. In addition, Eucalyptus maculate shall be planted,,along East Avenue per the Etiwanda Specific Plan.. 7) Care shall be exercised ��y all individuals, developers, and contractors' working near preserved`trees so that no damage .occurs to" such trees'. All construction shall preserve and protect the health of trees to remain, and new trees planted .to replace those removed.in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.08. 8) Prior to accepting a deposit on the property, s,1 the developer shall -require each prospect vp- buyer 'to sign a written notice of any existing windrows or trees requited by these conditions to be E'zeserved in place. Said disclosure shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation. 9) No construction, including utilities, that c3iarupts the root system shall be permitted. As a guideline, no trsnchingp or other construction activity should occur within 15 feet of the tree trunk. 'In particular, care shall be exercised, by the developer and contractors in designing and constructing street improvepients along Summit Avenue. 10) The two north south Local Feeder trails below Summit Avenue shall be connected to the Cou¢munity grail along Summit Avenue`per City Standard Drawing No. 1007 (step-through). PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 110. ( TENTATIVE TRACT 13808 - LEWIS HOMES July, 10, 1991 f? +: Page 5 ` Likewise,,the Local Feeder trails on Lots 10, 17, -18, and 19 shall connect to the southerly Community— rail per City,Standard Drawing No. i 1007.E �� 11) The entrances to all Community Trails from Blue Gum Driver;a'East Avenue shall, be constructed per Cfty Standard Drawing No.<1006A (vehicle gate with side step-through access). 12) Trail' fencing shall not be installed at the outside portion of'trails abutting existing or proposed trails in order to prevent "split ::.rails." �z. 1 131 Local Feeder trails shall be left^open at connections with streets;,and constructed with drive approaches for equestrian service access. I 14) Houses shall be setback a minimum distance of L; 10 feet from trails occurring at•s'da yards. 15) All Community trails and Local -Feeder trails shall be constructed concurrently `b,ith the street improvements. Engineering Aivi'sion: 1) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of.- the ' existing overhead - utilities (telecommunications -and electrical) , on the opposite side of Summit Avenue and East i� Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to reccrdatien of tthe:Final Map. The fee shall be, one-half the City's adopted unit amount times: a) The length from the center of Summit Avenue to the south project boundary, less the "Not,A Part" frontage,,,,plus b) The length from the center of East Avenue. to th1-west project boundary. 2) Construct Summit Avenue full width, including street lights`, along the entire project- frontage with a transition to the existing pavement west of the project's west- boundary for a 40 mph design speed. Off-site sidewalks and parkway, ,landscaping may be deferred until development of the adjacent property, The PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLe�fION NO. TENTATI`JE TRACT 13808 - ,LflOIS HOMES July 101 c1991 Page 6 developer.may request a re mbursemewC agreement:, for improvements north of the centerline from future redevelopment as it occurs On the opposite side of the street. <V 3) Construct East Avenue as follows; a) Full width from Summit AveY'-,e to„ the project's south boundary,`tncludirgfz,�I, n sidewalk, street lights, and street trees on both sides of the street. I-Khe developer may request reimbursement agreements for improvements ea-t of ,the centerline, from future redevelopment as J it occurs on the opposite side of the , street, not otherwise, reimbursed as specified below. b) Reconstruct the existing . section to ultimate Secondary Arterial standards at as 38 foot "backbone" width from ''the south projert boundary to Highland Avenue. The full 32-£oot half section, including curb, /`guttere sidewalk, street trees, and street lights, shall be completed on the west side between the south project boundary- and the existing improvements on `the GTE site. Provide transitions for a 50 mph design speed.; The developer may request reimbursement agreements :for off-site improvements not otherwise reimbursed as' ;; specified below from future f,velcpment as it occurs south of the project boundary. Depending on the results of the I-1S/SR30 interchange project under development, this condition may Abe modified by the Citj,,,Engineer to be in �•, coordination with the State project. 1 c) Construct a complete intersection of East and Highland Avenues and install traffic signals as approved by the City' Engineer. Depending on the results of the 5-15/SR30 interchange project under a development, this condition may be is modified .by the-,*,, City Engineer to be in; coordination with the State project. f d) Construct a complete:-Intersection of East and Summit Hvenues with transitions to I meet existing "pavement east on Summit t PLANNING CO114ISSSON RESOLU-JON NO, TENTATIVE TRACT "13808 - LEWIS HOMES` duly 10, 1991 Page 7 (40 mph design speed) and north on East , Avenue (50 mFh: ifesign speed), 0 e) The developer shall be eligible for fee credits against and reimbursement from the %? Transportation Development Fee for the portion of the improvements ' e ermined by the City Engineer a of s pplemental s-'ze,: length or capacity over that needed for the impacts of this development, In conformance with Ordinance No. 445. >�5 4) The City Will notify property owners with liens for the construction of, portions of East and Summit Avenues to participate with the \ developer in,those construction costs, per lien file numbers 1, 44, and-.98. 5) _ Install "Nu Stopping Any Time!' signs along the East and Summit Avenue frontages.• 6) Etiwanda/Sar,: Sevane Area Master Plan Storm " Drains- a) o �I C nstruct Lines.. Sk, 51, and Sm in:, and East Avenues to meet the existing master plan facility north of Highland Avenue. Redesign the lines referenced on -. f the Grading Plan for a Q1L0 and to stay within the realigned East Avenue. Install, catch basins on both sides of S;=mit and East Avenues. b) Construct Portions of 1E ..,.:r Plan svatem d, in 24th,Street, ssfficient to protect the site from upstream flows as determined by the final 3tainage report approved by the City,Engineer. c) he developer :shall receive credit for the cost of constructing permanent ultimate facilities up to the amount cof the drainage ',Fee and shall be"'"-+-mbursed for excess costa from future fe, llection, in accordant`=_ with City policy., PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTIMIVE TRACT 13808.- LEWIS HOMES July 10, 1991 Page 8 1) Extend the locA storm drain in Slue Gum Drive 1, up Shoshone Place to meet the pipe from Tract i 12462. f% 8} Overhead utility service dines which cross East Avenue shall be placed underground prior to completing the East Avenue street improvements. ` 5) Remove the exiatiZ,F pavemeY*Awherd(East Avenue is realigned north of B1ue"Gum Drie and vacate the existingj right-of-way which exceeds 44 feet east of the realigned centerline. 70) Cor``.ruct full street end parkway improvements ~ T .-oss the "Not A Part" parcel fronting East dVenue north ,of Blue Gum Drive, including a (( theme wall located outside the intersection line-of-sight, ��ly 11) Remove the existing drive approaches on East Avenue for the "Not A part" parcel north of Blue Guff Drive and replace them with a driveway 7 on to Kincaid Court. (� o 12) Lot "A" shall be dedicate4_to the adjacent "Not VW A Part" parcel. A lot line adjustment to combine Lot "A' with the "Not A Fart^ parcel shell be recorded crncurrently with the Final Map. 13) Construct a 10-foot: wide Community trail along the :south pi;oject boundary and a 20-foot wide ` Community trail running north and south from the intersection of Blue Gum Dr va- and Winchester Court. Provide corner cutoffs, at the intersection of the two Community Trails and trail crose.ing approaches where they intersect Summit arid East Avenues. �T l 14) The concrete swain north of the Community Trail a along the south tract boundary shall be located in a private drainage easement. The easement shall specifically accept drainage from the 1i Camaunity Trail. t5) A separate Community Trail plan per City Standards shall be provided subject to approval of the City Engineer: for the two interior Community Trails along the south tract boundary and running north and south from the Sine Gum/Winchester Court intersection. -yc, F PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISENTATIVE TRACT 13808 - LEWIS HOMES l `'Guly 10, 1991 ? Page 9 :.1 6. The Secretary, to this Commission shall certify to'lthe adoptio of this Resolution. ` APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF 7ULY 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary l �s I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution ra s---duly and, regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Running Coamir.. n of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cosion held an the 10th day of July 1991, by the fell--wing vote-to-wit: AMk AYES: COWISSION77S: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1) i fl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(xA- STAFF REPORT *� DATE. 4 July 10, 1991 ` TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 --SAM'S PLACE A request to conduct live mu,4ic in conjunction with a restaurant"and bar located in the Neighborhood Commercial District at; 6620 Carnelian Street, northwest corner- of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. CONDITIONAL USE FERMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE - A review of compliance with conditions of approval and consideration Ci of suspension or revocation of the Conditional Use Permit `<'or a restaurant and bar located in the Neighborhood Commercial District at 6620 Carnelian Street, northwest corer of; 19th and Carnelian S"'ts - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. ti=. AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 = SAM°S,PLACE A request to extend the hours of operation for an existing restaurant and bar located in the Neighborhood Commercial District at;) 6620 Carnelian Street, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets -'APN: 201-811-56 through 60. 1. � BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting-a,continuance of the ;`+ove-described items to"Vie July 24, 1991 meeting (see Exhibit ' Letter from Applicant dated JunGi 27, 1991).. The reason is 'the need to advertise a.related public hearing ,itezj to modify a Condition of Approval that prohibits live entertriinment. II. RECOMMENDATION 'Staff recommends continuance of the above described items to the July 24, 1991 meeting. Respe Y tted, Brad uller City Planner. BB:NF/jfs r Attacn_`ents: Exhibit ^A' - Letter from Applicant dated June 27, 1991 't - ITEMS S, T, & u` ANNEA-ILN0 r \\ O F F 1 C F 3 - ISAMk . JOHN D MANNERINO SAL BRIGUGLIO June 27, 1991 VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION Mr. Brad Buller Planning Department CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Sam's Place Rear Brad: When first:we applied for an Entertainment Permit, on or before May 28, 1991, in regards to the above-captioned matter, it was only then that we were advised that the Commission wished to review the Conditional Use Permit. We requested that both be heard at the sami time, which request was granted. When I inquired concerning thi feasibility of re-applying to modify the hours of operation of Sam, Place, I was told that there were no limitations. We filed the application, paid the filing fte and incurred the expense of obtaining mailing labels.` Subsequently thereto, we were advised tha; (1) we were unable to apply_:xfor the modificatiort; and (2) that it was necessary to modify the"original Conditional. Use Permit to obtain permission for live entt. ' iinment. At eacai juncture, we have followed the , ^etructions off, the City implicitly. All we request is that `these matters be held simultaneously before the Planning Commission. I have been recently informed,that, because of the continued changes in instruction from staff, the application for live entertainment and the application to modify the Conditional Use Permit to allow for live entertainment will be held on July lffj: 1991 and July Z4, IS11, respectively. The purpose of this- letter is to respectfully request that the hearing on &11 these matter be held simultaneously on the.24th of July, 1991..'., This is not only for the cake of,,,convenien-Q, but because of ay present unavailability on July '1j, 1991 for ::he represent icm of my client. Very tr yours, I4AHNSRI HRIGOGIaIG By; ERINO AQL JDM/dr -�-- cc: S. ellegsino � 1� 9333 BASELINE ROAD,SUITE 1,101 RAtJCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730,TFL(714)900.11001 FAX(714)941.8610 CITY OF RANCHO CUC t MONGA' STAFF REPORT Aft DATE; July 10, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission ��JJ FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner I BY: Bruce Buckingham, Planning Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTzL, ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL US?3 PERMIT 91-19 - H''& L CHARTER -'The request,,to establish a vehic-�e a storage and maintenance'facility in a leased space, f J >.�4,560 square feet,'within an existing 5adustrial bui?divg on 2.24 acres of land in the General industrial D sz� et (Subarea 3) of the lnduptiial Specific,Plaa f ''- oc .ed at 8801` Hems Avenue 3Ptvc 209-032-59. Staff recommends �= issuance of a Negative Declaration. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested. Approval of a.-Conditional L►fie Permit to allow a charter bcJ service wa' `::he General,,Sndustrial District, Subarea 3, of the Industria7.t Specific Plan and the issuance of a Negative,;"-,tNxattcn. v B. Applicable Regulations`: A charter bus service is considered a Fleet Storage use as defined by ;the Industrial-Specific Plan. Within Subarea'3, Fleet Storx-?4 i.s permitted subject to the approval of a Conditional Useflil mat. C. Surrounding Lana Use and Zonin : North Storage yard; General Industrial (Subarea 3) uth Industrial Buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 3) List - vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 3) , . .West -; Industrial Buildings; 7, eaeral Industri,a-�--"(Subarea 3) D. General Plan'Designations: Project Site - General,Industrial North General ::neustrial South - General Industrial East General Industrial- West General In&istrial E. Site .Characteristics: The`" site is developed with an office/warehouse building and storage yard. ;The perimeter fencing is'predominately chain link with a small'area;next to the building consisting',of a wrought.iron fence,and gates. In addition--the current parking/storage area is partially paved with t;,�emainder covered with 314 inch gravel., Y ITEM V 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, CUP 91-19. H & L CHARTER = July 10, 1931 Page i F -_2arxinc� Citiculations: Number of Number of Type 5cure Parking ! Spaces Space!= of Use C Footage T.atio 12equire ??a�icled Office 2,1'S0 1/250 9 Warehouse 2,400 1/1000 2 Fleet Storage S buses 1/vehicle fl 11 + S bus spaces '. The e!-::ire site is either paved with aspAalt or 'gravel and is --- more than adequate to accommodate the use.< s II. BACKGROUND: In April of 19$* , the Planning Commission approved a Mino3;Devel meat.RPviewfo- an oEEice'expanson on the north side of the building. A Condition' of Apprc al required a lot line adjustment because the property.line,:atythat time,.bisected the building_, me loin line'was consc uent3y shifted to the north (see E'Xhibit "B") The current applicant is requesting to ccmr�X only a portion of the newly oreated parcely-the south half of'wie building and the adjacent stowage_ area (ape - ibit "C")• the nurser:: property owner will continue to use the-north half of the building and tht i `; storage area up to 9th Street. Therefore, staff has limited its recommenced Conditions of Approval to only the southern portion of the parcel affected by t m,app] vfnt's '_-quest. III. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing a vehicle storage ;hard and mai.ntel,ance facility for eight buses. The proposed hours" of operation are 7:30 a.m. to 5:,30-p m-4, Monday through Fxie,k and 7-30 a.m. to 12.00 p.m., 8-,turday t`tnd Sunday. However, buses are available:-for charted=an a 24-'hour basis. 'Typical charters range from day,,,use onlysto five days. The proposed „ _`:operation does not generate -talk-in traffic and all ,persons _ chartering a'bus are pi�sked up off-site. Generally,,there are a maximum of seven employees, including- manaoemen"i working on-site. In addition, to eight drivers could be `:'a_,duty but are no on the premise' during the course j of their work. .. T',se Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, has indicated that the Helms Avenue entrance should be equipped with a Kno:K lnckAtey sw;;tah and that a'site plan be submitted for review , and approval prior to occupancy• r C �r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT -0 CUP 91�19 H & I, CHARTER July-lo, 1991 Page"3 ( B. Compatibility with Surrounding Uses: The proposed sirs- is within Subarea_3 of the Industrial Specific Plan. This General Industrial District permit's such uses as 1i;4nt manufacturing, light storage/distribution, automotive repair - major and minor, and `2,v:`Kactorls offices and yardst The properties to the west and soath are industrial„braldings,; the property to the north is a uox'�tractor"s office and yard,%,and the property to the east is'?,vacant but. has an approved industrial park for thelsite- Therefore, staff anticipates no conflicts between the existing use_ and £he proposed use. C. Site Improvements: The Industrial Specific Plait xequires that all storage areas within the,General Industrial District, be screened from 'y,�-' c `view. "Therefore, Che site should be upgraded to include the follovi:na,.t(see Exhildt "C"): 1. An 8-foo1c, b gh block wall should be constructed along both street frontages at the minimum 25-foot setback from I the face of curb: 2. The 25-foot a`,Iandscape 'setback.' should be irrigated and planted per='City Standards. 3. A wrought iron gate�or solid decorative metal gate should be installed at the driveway on Peron Boulevard. 4. The existing wrought iron gat Ai,;and fence should remain, but the existing asp;4alt= paJement within"'the 25-foot landscape :setback should be removed and landscaped. ` S. The uapaved portion of the lot should be paved to include r a minimum of 11 automobile parking spaces. 6. An 8-foot high block wall should be constructed on the " east property line to connect the wall on Peron Boulevard with the processed building (apps-)ximately 1-2 feet). The approved industrial park to the east is currently in. plan check. The zero lot line buildin_gr"when,constructed, will act 5 as a screen wall for thy: entire east property line except the p southerly 12 feet.. 'Therefore, if building permits arP issued 6uZ-»1e Industrial park prior to .':he applicant occupying the sift), no further sere^aning will be necessary. However, :If no building permits are .issued, ar_.,S-foot high block wall should -, �e built along the ezi.t-property line prior to occupancy. D. Parking: 'Because of the large parking'area on the.'sxte, staff anticipates no;parking'problems: A Condition of Approval has . been added to ensure that the minimum required parking spaces ,r be.stxiped pr:r City Standards. PLANNING COMMr 7sr-IN STAFF MPORT CUP 91-19 - E & L CHARTER r ' July 10, 1991 Page 4 E. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part I of the Initial Study and completion of Part li of the initial Study, the. Environmental Checklist, sta€f has found no significant impacts to the proposed.use'. However,"a Condition of Approval has> been added',to ensure' that all haza rdous mate _'als and waste be disposed of properly. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to 'approve this application, the following findings need to he made by the Planning Commission; \~� A. That the proposed usr, ir3 in accord ':tith the General' Plan, the \ objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of ;the" Irdustrial Specific Plan in which the site is located. B. The proposad use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare oY materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity- C. The proposed use ti)complies with each of the applicable provisions, of the Development Code and Industrial Specific Plan. V. CORRESPONDFVCE: This item ham, been advertised as a public hearing 1r' in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property Owners and existing tenants within j00' feet of the project. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit(- 91-19 through adoption of. the { attached Resolution Of ,Approval and 'issuance of a Negative Declaration.; { Res 4�ully submitted, Bra uIrle city Planner - BB:BB/jfs ` Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter 1` Exhibit "P" - Parcel Xkip Exhibit "C" - Site P1aA Exhibit "D" - Floor Plan Resolution of,Approval I i! f k/ A �W _ '�7C'Jnz�313 y ` r45 CV.My Bf'vd., 34 6 ?ia1t., eC?!�1,92376 (7141 877-5344 t ,1 it CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT--FILING REQUIREMENT B4 'fo the appl cai;t proposes to lease the project!Ilocation for a transportation charter service business. H '& L Charte lhas a fleet of eight motorcoaches. The property would be �ed for offices, incidental maintenance, and-arking of coaches. No changes are needed at the property'fo;hny anticipated business functions of the applicant. The basic hours of operation are 7:30 AM to 5:SO�PM,. Monday through Friday, 'and to 12,00 Noon, Saturday°and Sunday. Hours are subject to change, however, depending on actual charter trips scheduled. Coaches are available for charter , on a 24,hour basis. Departures and return of equipment(Ile- pend on individualtcharters performed, The number of employees on any given shift varies according to.charter"s scheduled. Generally, seven employees, including manager'ienP, work during the day shift on the site Monday thsoug'l! Friday, and 'three' employees"work Saturday and Sunday.- Up to eight drivers could be on duty at z,,;i=�4ame time;'Dgener ally day-evening shift, but these employees would not be s the premises during the course of their work. No employees„ routinely work night shift. The reason for requesting a CUP,ifor this property location is the applicant'& belief that(," property is well suited for the applieent's business needs. The applicant's business operation wou' d be compatible', '( the neighborhood of .other commercial/general industrial J busCnesses and would not interfere An any other present business The coaches are uniformly painted and well main- tained=-tt',ey Would not detract from the neighborhood visually nor cag e 'undue emissions in the environment. No cha%4es are necessary as this particular site has more than -sufficient office space for business functions. -Office personnel, including management, total four full.time-ands' one part time. The present•-=.huilding. has four individual ! offices and a 'larger central office which could accommodate` �Kf�t L17";;��Af rr r CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT--FILING REQUIREMENT B4 H & L CHARTER, CO., INC.- (PG 2f lz� at least two employees. One of the extra offices would be use�l'as a donference room, primarily for :driver training inservices. i No changes are necessary in the shop/warehouse area. No / heavy equipment repair would,be conducted on the premises. The area Mould be used for storage;of tools, tires, and other miscellaneous, bus, parts. Incidental-maintenance of coaches would include washingl replacement of 'minor bus parts and'.tires, and safety inspections. No changes arel necessary to the yard site. The present , lined-parking k3 adequate for employee parking. and the coaches would be, parked along the rear fence line--Parking is not required for customers because the business is usu- ally conducted through telephone sales and does not generate I any walk up traffic. The applicant has been ;providing quality transportation service based on safe, dependable equipment and courteous, professional drivers s�:nce 1986. The applicant has been renting from a truck stop property '(also sifnce 1980) and desires a quality locat 'on for its business. t a , C1 ESs(�Iyq NINTH STREET 101, -1463 Jr,� VIVIt� lx'0 C►i seaI E:(":)Oo' PARCEL m>A" :lb AREA r 61,004 SF, LEGEND `�'(301 9� acrsr:Nr, LOT LINE ---- a l' PROPOSED LOT LINE Ai a s4e 7. ELYy ',Nf BbT (789.IG) E3trSTih"G Idr LINE 300�'+►ELAE d ,� OE rCATION LEaft DE=IPVCN NSL O.R. W W444M TI ' �r v. `) (See E8A►m1 'A" Affach") �„ •�.:_ =ram � ; PARCEL "g I a a " L _ �_ R�VtauS 1 dr 4ia F t LOB' LINE ADJWT r r9r. 5XIS I144 BIJILD144 11� v � m pf 0. ROJi d i Al E RFD "► 8T3F-'N�.NIt ';AYEIVlJE Sep E 1 L a R ,CA �> rn+l sear-jfR �r+ _ go' Ida PiEMMM ®P i dFIC® 9/jr/® JW MNEERINGIs CONSULTING : IL 2NG;N€EP �i • _ .., . ., ••• _� gym.- •... :':". .. L'X.� a _. �c:;fiaGr7l, L..�•! P;t� t �' f• `Y Tn $a L"ErAlsp RpS�C-eFMffa11 �-gNoS�APbD � —•� ij Rpm amt i M O ��� p�o�SEg�'FP. GX4Sf�l� k ®t-f1c 44 tu ! 2 ter' �('AM Fr Kt DI 1 r ,tcl4e 0 ' ® - ? , l 4 ,.r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION\ter, THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,R PROVING CON"TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-19 FOR A,'.:7EHICLE STORAGE AND MA NTISUZNCE FACILITY, LOCATED AT 8801 HELMS AVENUE, 11? THF. GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 3, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APH: 209-032-59. a r<. A. Recitals. Il H & L Charter has ,C an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No.. 91-19 as described in th'a title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,' the subject Conditional' Use 1 hermit request is:re£erred to as "the application." 1 (ii) On the 10th day of July 1991, the P"-inning Commission of ``^he City of 'Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly .noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to't�e,adcptian of this Resolution Iave occurred. i' ,r B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by 4A e Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as 'follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifivally ,finds that'all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,-Part A, of` ais Resolution are.true and correc'.1 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commis ?�on during the above-referenced public hearing on July 10, 1991 including written and oral staff-reports, together with public testicony, :this Commission hereby .r specifically finds as follows: M , (a) The application applies to property located at 8801 Helms Avenue with a rcreat frontage of approximately 490 feet and Sot depth of approximately 191 'feet and is presently .improved-with an office/warehouse building; and (b) The property to t*ae :orth of the subject site is a storage yard, the property to the south of that site consists of industrial buildings, the property to the east is vacant, and the pperty to the west is industrial buildings. (c) : The application cont4mplatEs the use of the site for a bus charter service, 'Including the storage and minor maintenance) of eight, motorcoaches.. PLPNWING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No, c 'CUY 91-19-- H & L CF.ARTER July_10, 1991 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presen% 'fsndied to thi finds gsio during the;above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific ns off facts set forth in'paragraphs 1 r'rid 2 above, this Commission hereby fines and cone'ud6a as follows: l (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, �Yse objectives of he Development Code, and the purposes or the di I� ict in w%lich the site is located- (b) That the proposes! uae, together with the conditions appliqlble thereto, will not be detrimental to the publia6health, safety, or elfare or ma\erially injurious to properties"or improvements in the ci^•inity• Jam\ That the proposed gse complies with a h of the applicable provisions o.� the�D velopment Code. = �1� p "4.''> This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and'considered in compliance With the.California Environmental Quality ActUt�\ 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Dec7raration:: 5 ,` cried, upon- 'findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,�3, and 4 above, tl .a Commission hereby ,approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. °� 1) This approval shall apply to the; fleet storage' of charter buses only storage of other vehicles, equipment, or materials s prohibited except, where otherwise permitted by the Indnt�r'lil Area specific Plan. r h 2) Approval shall _expire, unless extended by the Planning Commnission, if building permits are (i not J175ued or approved use ,has not commen;•ed within 24 months from the date%of approval. 3) ` Approval of this request shall not waive complian��with"all sections oi•'the,Development Code, Industrial Area Specific Plan,;`and all 'other pertinent City ordinances. titi) if the ope~ation of the •a'.ity causes adverse -� effects upon,.,adjacent bus nes"sec or operations, 1 inciu'ing but/ not limfted to; liaise, this Conditional Use Permit 'shall be brought back o before the Planning Commission' for ; consideration and possible terminatYon, of the use. a try r A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. " CUP 91-19 - H & h CHARTSA � J'aly 10, 199 "Page S 5) Occupancy of the 5acility shall not commence unt 1 such time an all uniform Building 'Code an$ State Fire Ma,''shal's regulations have been Complied with _,-,tor to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building p`d Safety Division, to show compliance. Thc_fhuild Ag shall be inspected for compliance prier to occupancy: t. bl An 8-foot high block wall shall be constructed on Helms Avenue ar..d Feron Boulevard the minimuu 25-foot ;aei-l�ack from; the face of curb and the return^wall on the east property line. A detailed site plan'shall,be submitted, to the, City_Planner for review and approval prior,to the issuG. ' of building permits. 7) The 25-foot landscape area shall be irrigated and planted to meet` all City Standards,. This area shall include the existing paved area north of the Helms Avenue driveway. A \\ landscape and irrigation plan, signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect, shall' be submitted' to the City Planner for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 8) A wrought iron`gate or dec r\tive metal gate shall be installecf,�st th"�Lveway on reron "A. -footBoulevard and ro � block wall. 3) The parking lot shall be stripee/perk City j Standards to include a -minimum '11 autowbile.: parking spaces. G 10) P:.-ior 'to occupancy of the proposed sites one o: the following shall occurs building permits shall bp, issued for the approved industrial park to-,:he east or an S-foot block wall shall ie consiri`c*.ed along the east property line per the City Planner's review and approval.. 11) Al2 hazaQ dour materials and wastes, includingrt but not} `limited to, motor, oil, brake fluid, transmV i�bn fluid, azad Freoa shall be properly S disposF's_:of in accordance with state and local j regulations. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUE.' 91-1 j H & I. CHARTER 3u1y.10. �991 Page 4 Of J 12) All improvements required by these conditions shall be completed prior to any vehicle storage use of the project site. 13) Pursuant to provisio" of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not 2x..-:-,perativa, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, -until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD), regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Hoard of Supervisors, of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filitag fees assessed pursuant to California Fiyh and Game Code Section 711.4, together with ny- required handling charges, k1 are paid to the aunty Clerk of the County of 1 San Bernardino. appiesant shall provide j the Planning Depart,-ent with a stamped and conformed copy bi is NOD togert,er with a receipt showing that all fees haveJhbeen paid. _ In the 'event this application is determined AdEL exempt frog suc'x filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish anc. Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of ' ,t required handling charge for filing a Certificate ofr Fee Exemption; this condition shall be deems,-, and void. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution: I I APPROVED AND ADOPTED T.'HIS 10TH DAX' OF aJULY 19g1.',," �I ZILANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF I2ANCHO.CCt^AM'JNGA BY- Larry T. McNiel, Chairman'= u ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary t� c-1/ PLANNY.`I3v UommusION RESOLUTION NO. CUP .91-19 -tH & L, CHARTER ' v' July 10, 1991 Si Page 5 I, Brad. Bulle>:, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hespby certify that the foregoing ResalutioiN was '3`.y and r regularly introduced> passed, and adopted'ry the Plannia".'x Commission of the ' l` Cityof Rancho Cucamonga, ga, at a, regular meeting of the Planning Commission held _ on the 10th-.day of vuly 1941, by the full wing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: —< ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Afth lr f \j F� '•D ,_ GENERAL,-i ENGleR,'EERfNC, CONTRACTOR Fn CONTRACTOR LICENSE i SA--S "3,7 HELM,AVENUE'•POST�"';CCBt7X 215 '� RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 91,73Q r"� (7141989.3714) FkX:(7i'4)99F+0754 1 Jul . Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500'Ci:vic Center Drive l� � Rancho' Cucamonga, Ca 91730,, Re: Conditional Use Permit 91-19 Ii & Ir Charter -Dear Chairperson and Cemmissianw:;§, I have reviewed the staff rem t far the above Cond�tiond,? Use l Permit and proposed resolutioe with no objeotioi-ts to improvements l required-nor conditions; except Item '-,i>£ the `resolution, completion prior -to I ,orage c., Due to the noed of the tenant, over crowding whew they are, and' "f the landowner, I am requesting that. Item 12 be removed,.: l 7, believe that gust ha's developed over time with t e.,"cit�+� and 0 a hat improvements will,:be completed.t mely,,yand'tot the``stund¢rdA - of Rane ho Cucamonga. �--kith the approvsl oF"tFxers drawings will be prepare�lright away and submittad :for' approval,.and permits. However, .time :is ne(Uded for al.l"Iniases o£ the process and time is of the essence. Again I ask, that Item 12 of the resolution be re oved and passed. Thank yr)uL es "r" .'✓x .tt -�� I, --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' STAFF REPOI,T - :.., Av �� i 1 , DATE: _ duly 10, 1991 t Ghairmanand M amb,.rs op Planning Commission I � FROM: ,� Brad��iller, City Planner i i, iii BY: Tim Gi�hnr Assistant Planner, SUBIECT: CONDITIONAL, USE PERMIT •91 -14 - <.,Rom notiD CHURCH She request to establish a church in a leased, apace oV 3,520, square feet within an existing'-7_ti t€Giant ,.ndustrial buillding.` within the Generai Industrial ".DiLt st (Subarea 3) of the Industrial-Specific; Ftan,,:.,located"'at 1680 Helms Avenue--- APN: I. PROJECT AA'D SITE DESCRII-TION: ' A. Action aguested: `ReviHw a `a:.ron oh.truction Conditional Use Permit, for a church within an.le:'3,P i1'ig:;-ulti-tena.Yt `industrial building, B. S'arrounding-sand Use and Zoning ^.' North Industrial"bu:Lldi!t-q;,'General Yndu�trial. District Subarea' 3) South - 'Multi-tenant industria? buil.3inq; GeKzsal Indutstriall J District. (Subdr9a 3) Lust - Industrial building; General Ynduatrial`Distrz..v °tSubarea 3) 4`?. West - �ultt-tenant.industrial bui?linr?; Gener'a31 In3ushr? '•istrict (Suha ez`3) C. _General Plan Designations: Project Site o General Industrial North,, - Generi3 Indus`tirial � South -• General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial L Site Charr_cteicistics: The tan L ^ted within an exsti , ` a uildini ' + g oniug „ >J square feet o£ t `i21 parking s , paces ✓,, li, � TTF�2 w ) C l• PLANNING COMMISSION STASF REPORT ' } CUP 91-7,14 CHURCH 1' t !` Ju3y '10, 1qs Page 2 \y,� rf. �` _ 1• Z, Parkina Cal-00 ions. Nurluer 9f Number of Type, `"' 4..w Square Parking Space_s . = Spaces -f of Use Footage Ratio_ Required Provided �C ChurcS Sarc�, ary ^y2_,640 1/35* 75f �.; Office '' Sao : 1/250 4 i i 3,520 _1 79 = 9 '* 1 parking space for each 35 square feet of seating area wither'` the main auditorsim where there are no fi:�cd seats. - F. Apicable Regulations: l � 2 Industxaa Ares Speci£i�c .Plan f` conl�itionally permits ab' rch ases within the;seneral industrial District'1(Subarea 3). A/ r IT ` ;ALYSIS: A. General: The Rock; Solid C;iurch is pro_.^._sing to locate its church withiw an existing multistenant industrial.-building (See -- Exhibit �'B") The chzr'ch is proposingg t6 utilize' a total of 3,520 square feet of teiv ,t'space, with 2,640 square fee: of that area devoted to them sahctuaxy. At this tiltte khp church propose��'to hold services on Sunday,'frGm 10 40 'a.m. ,-to 12.30 p.m. and 6-00 p.-p. do 3s0P p.m. end on Wednesda, from 7:30.p.m. to 9:00 Vim. Office hours`;are.proposed from Sr60 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Mondv tr rough rridayExhiI�jc\^A'l). B. Issues: The primary iss�^�s related,to 1. ocating thin 't,jpe ,� use within r� „industrial setti'lig are compatibility with surrounding uses and availability of parking. _The folicwi g sections add_ese;and discuss tb6�Je issues.' 1. .:Compatibility of Uses: The appl ce.tion proposes_to occ xpy tenant space within a partially-:occup�.ed malt -tr^:ant indus-jlrial building. Turc' of. the three tenant spaces. a 6/currently occupied-b6 manu`acturing and business su ibrt uses: 'Use of the tLGe. as, a church office during noxmal brtsinesa' houra will not have an impact an`'existing businesses. Use of the site for church activities will take ;,place Burk: q 1L' p g nd.on weekends. ^Sere'off-peak in she f,ven:i a n are currently several churchfs operating , in industrial Complexes 'thrcug1ii2a_, the„City witai no reports of;.conflicts of :se Kctmpatibil'tt_y problecw,- ani -therefore, compatibility,`�ohle�•associated ,rit r PLANNING COMMISSION 57AFF.REPORT CUP 9,i-14 ,,_*CK`SOLID CHURCHr, _ July"1 D y 1991 61 this' proposal are not expected. Nevertheless, to ' ensure, contril over land use compatibility the Resolution of 1pprovaiy'contains a condition ,stating "If opexatxop of the facility causes�-adverse effects ;i upon adjacent businesses or operations, the r' Conditional.. Use Permit')shall be brougtt before the Planning ComTrIpsion 'for consideration and possible tentiination of�'nhe-use. ' AvailabLI -tX of Parkins: Parking requirements' f r this type'�of_use are S3ased upon potential seating capacity bftthe sanctuary area and square foota9 a of t the office area. "`The Development Code requires_7c parking sxrces for this use. The_prcposed Ueal is .., Zoca..wed w i ithir a 10 5 60� s.a . aware i St n mult i-ten ant industrialSiilding designedin atizo of� �1 par$, space for each 400 square feet, of gross floor area providing 26 parking,spaces (2 of these spaces, were "provided through bidycle racks, which have since been removed). However, because' of th%constr 'tion'of a �E t second trash'":nclosure, there 'a3� only'21 par`kings spaces�withi.n-project boundaries: Based upon these• design ;equirements,' 9 parking spaces, were provided for`thZs''tenant suit'-D. 7 As there wi12'be 2 people in the office, during normal bus.ness hourt. staff does not anticipate a conflict witir)adjacen''r'businessas, I howeverF availability of par�a'ng for -he church r3s extremely limited. ) The application states that thie a ;are presently 'e-10 r people who would attend services (zee x8hibit "A"). Hot ever,, preliminary calculations,- by •-the Ranch' Cucamonga Fire Protection Districtindicate that the occuptint load,;�r the..2,640 square foot- sa studry`0may be as high r 3S0 people. . If fixe.. seating were provided, the Deve lopment Code� u ul�2 ;regtire on ` parking space for every fouC sR;ts'in recognition of the family oriented nature.of" eher::he4: Using. hi's 1 method as a guide, the maximum occupancy that should `' i b`e allowed under, this:,Condition al Use'Permit would be L?4 pers.3ns (21 I. spaces x �S). Therefore, the Conditional- Use Perm%t is 'recommended to be conditioned with this limitation. � With ,said condition, and the offset 'peak .p_:rking-'hours, io parking conflicts are antic pated.' PLANNING COMMISSION.STAFF REPORT jl CUP 91-14 ROCK SOLID CEURCH, July 10, 1991 fffl 4_k Page A (1 U C. Fire District Comments: The Fire District carducted a Plan Check (,see Exhibit "E") and indicated that based upon the ' project's square footage(tthe use will:-,be classified as a Public Assembly. Therefore, plans shall be submitted to tlt\jRancho� r Cacam6ngi Firer Protection District to verify compliance with State,-Fire Marshall's requirements. �• III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make ;the following findings before approving this application: _ A. That the�i?rpposed use is;in accordance with:the Goneral Plan, 1 the objectives of the Development Code, and the ourp;�sGss of the fIndustrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located. !1 f B. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, %afety', or use, or .materially injurious to, properties or improvements.in the vicinity." C. that the proposed uae complies with each of the,"applicable provisions of the Industrial'Speci£i6 Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has be' nh'adv4tiaed as a Public Hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspimer, the propert� Y'was posted, and notices wnre sent to all property owners withint)300 project 1 feet o£ the ro'ect site. V. RECOM11ENDAT1ON ,Staff recommends; approval oE`Candztional Use Permit 91-14 through adoption of the+attached Resolution. Resp ily s to 2; / Bra City Tanner BB:TG:js Attachmentsr.)• Exhibit "A" - Te ter from Applicant t Exhibit "B" - Site Plrn Exhibit "C" - B-uld r. Floor Plan Exhibit "D" - Floor Plan Exhibit "E" - Fire>District Comments ' s�: Resolution of Appibval 4 { le 16,199i a _.Lj 3'f .��'.GYY�.liL.LI+:c�fi141n fcl iffYrf ,i 61 •'_I " - tnniYaubpar-tmEnE C-Or,"tionti3 Use Permit .Non--Const;ruo zon"for Roc4. a! 1'id chug-< +3 i �z�,:d �le3;ns l�nt�ro"rucain onga. 1.1e use of thk building *i31 be fx3r Church Ucr`ship.Services. uIe halve j 8 - its peopla .'khat are, goi�iIg _o E�Ssemble on"�unday rp-,fiiqg f,-.jr- service; BSI z,nu; --gain on �Linday evening. We l also ccJny'regato' bn Wedrio.�Cay even J'lgs. Uur _cn r ule of aer,/i:ces aiz_e as fa�xo s Sunday morning 10-TCS Sunday evening 6:00 - 8:00 (( Wedne+ day evening 7 30 oo ine number of employees will be two, the }'actor and hzs"v:i'fie: „hey wz... +l , working dU'ring the week offii.t' ;,Ours .8e(60 -'So00. The re s6n .for rerji,esting a cenditiona?. use permit is be�catlsG it- s' requirec+ by �;.}s ^.it>e= 'Thank You, f �� � /,�it a towns kA 1i Py)one 597-51f50 I - 14 t ,_ / 11 C•• • F4` Y/J{ 1 1,7 'S .I CIT% OF .RAINCRO,;, b.TCAAJONGk } PLANNING �l�ESON X L -o P cros � �ITIE J� ;=L.00w- PLAN � \ L 511 z A„ `, t OF I CHOJ_tUCAMONG L1G PLANNING t7 WISIOIV TTCLE "/v- 4IBrr- l�1 � ,r s ,� ! h r�� o rn . m ..o:� Xxxxx -xxxxx x ;c xx x x rxAx O ' � Si4r.lc4ttnr2 or ?J �C G-t-)•CJ{ c�(/�/.f I t. r`�t �O.Aj f'F.%ldet W C tvo J vr�+.: '=1oPhi ��1��I1�ks t�i)tC C I dOWn1 CITY OF FTCt�TC�:„CUCA.MONOF PLANNING TITLE: 'Ol 'DMSION .,. f\----- EXH3IT: - ,SCALE: t ROCK SLID CHURCH AMP ]*PLICAT'Y+DN 8680 Helr:s Rancho Cucamonga - U This memo %s Ito document the phone'conversation with Duke' nam—ns regtrding the occupant load of his prof'.osed �;} ,! church. `d told him there was a; ;:difference the numbers" W' presented because the application �re?ds a church for 10 peopie and the drawing indicates the,, use of about 50 ' chairs. Mr. Downs is aware that S,1rr M regulations will apply more restrictive exiting requirements. He knows Z exits will have to meet code andrrnLst include "panic',hardware and cl exit signs.' tj Y advised Fir. Downs that a fire ,z4arm 54ystem may be r�:,-quired under our orelinance. Ther'i�\ .is�- no scale� on o the, drawing so `T was not able to precisely calculate the occupant load to determine if an alarm system was required under' Appendix III-C of the Uniform Fire Code. Mr. Downs is aware that the drawingcannot he a r . this time. ppr� ed t+.9' Susan D. Wolfe, Fire Inspector ectorNI �t l j. k Ito �V l• , z. . us C� 0 K k 8t lz OFFIC . - tFF1 v U 4' cc U lj. o 1{ � 4 RESOLUTION N0: Y`, A RE,DLUTIOV OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF j RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING. CON[32TIONAL USE, PERMIT NO. 91-14, THE REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A CHURCH IN A LEASEUD SPACE OF 3,520 SQUAkE 'FEET WITHIN AN EXISTING _! MULTI-2ENANT INDUSTRIAL 'BUILDING, LOCATED AT 8680 HELMS AVENUE, IR.- HE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 'DISTRICT, (SUBAREA :3) 'OF INDUSTRIALL ,SPF^IFIC PLAN 'SAND MAKING 'FIND?NGS IN, SUPPORT THEREOF�i n2N: 209-022l18. C A. Recitals. j \r I (i} - Rock 'Solid Church has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-14 as described in the"title of this'` Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use/ Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On.the 10th of July 1991, the Planning Commission of the`%Aty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All Segal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. l� NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the �} Planning Commission: of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Commission hereby vpecifically`finds t-At all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,,,of this Resolution dire true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Coumiission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 10, 1991, including'written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony? this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application'applies to property located at 8680 Felms Avenue with a street frontagr.. of 195 feet along Helms .Avenue and a''3'tieet frontage of 151 feet' along 9th Street and is presently improved with ,;one multi-tenant industrial building. r,• c The properties :to the north, south, east, and west are presently-__' proved Owith various, industrial and multi-tenant :ldustrial Auk o < " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. CUP 91-.14 - ROCK SOLE O CHURCH c o ,7 . 1 1991 �\ Page c /� Q, l r (c) The application proposes to conducE ct, ah servic<s on Sunday from 10.30 a.m. to 12:30 1`�. and 6�00-,p.m. --Vc 8:0 p.m. and on i 'Wednesday from 7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m:; and office hours from 6:00 a.m. to S.0+0 q p.m.; Monday through Friday. 3. Based upon the: suSrca tial evidence presented to this Comulissie duringthe above-referenced public hearing; and upon the slecific findings of „facts set forth in paragraphs 1, and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds-and. concludes as follows: (a)�_,&at the prop:sed uce ie in accord with.the General Plan,' the objectives of the Developm�,itr 'Code, and the purposes of the district in -- which the site is located. } (b) That the proposed "use, together with the conditions'' applicable thereto, will'not be detrimentalto, the public health, saiety f� welfare or materially injurious to propflrties ar improvements in 'I%e vicinity. u , _ I+ (c) That•, the proposed use 'complien with,-each of the applicable provisions of the Deveidpaent Ccde.' 4. Based upon the-windings and conclusit-'s set Earth. 3n'i�paragraohs` 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subjectto each and every crri ition set forth Below and incorporated :herein by this'' reference. F, 1) Approval of this request shall not waive., compliance with all sect'ons of the Sndustial Area Specific Plan and all other ordinances.. ` 2) Tf operation of the facility causez adveise i%ffects uRon a&acent businesses of operations, the Permit shall be` brought i before the Planning Commission for consideration zad possible termination of the urie >.l} 7, 3) Occupancy of facility, she" of commence until such time ara all Uniform"Building Code and State Fire Marshall regulations bave been .J \, complied with. Prior to occupancyl plans shall be submitted to the' Rancho Cucamonga}\iTire Protection District and the Building "As Q, 0- y Division to show compYiance., The��building''� shall be--inspected for .compliance prior" to occupancy.. _ h+ d) An]t resig i"' s Eropoed for -the facility steal`•,; be dc`s peed in c aformance with the comprehensive l` 3 +� PLANNING COW RSION RESOLUTION NQ. ✓ CUP 91-14 - '.vack SOhIa-`-.CHUPc X duly 10, 1�91 Page 3 _ AWL Sign: Ordinance, any Uniform Sign Program"for the complex, and shall:,,require` review -and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation. , 5) Church services, public assembly, or. of:ler -' special gatherings shall be 13--§ted to a maximum of 04 people du_t a ' children),(a 3 including employees of the church. r ; ? .Tb,-�facility, 'shall be ope=�ited in confozmance�1 ; with the peeformance standards of Surarea 3. ' _ 7) Public assembly (i.e.t ices.,,' church gatherings, youth ma�,tings, etc.) a al1 only operate on weekdays after St30 p.m. aYw on weekends (excluding Nafional holidays). % o 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution— APPROVED APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY 1991 PLANNING COMPiiSSION or THI CITY OF RANCHO CU(!AMON'=A BY: �\ Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST., ' Brad Buller, Secz:etary I, Brad Hu11Pr, ,Se..x .-. ty of the Planning:-Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fC,Yeping Resolu4ion 'was,,duly acid rcgu7.arly .introduce],,,pasRed, and adopted by the Planning=Commissio , of the' _ City of Rancho Cucatw.,Via, at'a regular meeting of:the Pi-nning Cotmiq,�'on held ' on the 10th day of Zu,;j 1991,, by h,: following vote-to wit_,' AYES: COMM':SSIONERS: i NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: M11IMISSIONSRS: Y ` , b, �y V E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMODTGk STU1 'E REPO,",",AMIN. 10 DATE: July 10, 1991 T0: Chairman and_Members of the'Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-13 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES The request to establish a bus charter service wihin an existing building on 3 acres of land in the General^Industrial District '(Subarea 3) of the Industrial >Specific"Plan' located at 9567 -8th Street - a APNt ;209-171-38. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Reg_uested:,. Approval of a ron-°Y;�Z trdction Conditional Use Permit to allow a bus charter se`vlce within the General Industrial District and issuance o£,M 4egative Declaration. B. Applicable Regulations: The Indut;fiial Area Specific Plan allwis Fleet Storage,within Subarea ; Cu'bject to .the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Recsea't; onal Vehicle Storage is classified as public Storage and _iiz permitted, by right, within Subarea 3. C. 'Surrounding Land Use and EoniajLv North A.T. & S.F.'Railroad; General Industrial, Industrial r 1 AYea Specific Plan, Subarea 3. O South - .Self Storage Complex and vacant �,tnd; General Industrial, Industtial Area Specific Ilan, Subareas 3 and Q. East -' Concrete'`Contractor's Office and Yard; General Industrial, Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 3. West . - Recycling Center; General Industrial, Industrial Area Specific Flan, Subarea 3. D. General Plan Designations.' Project Site General Industrial 0 North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - 'General Industriail'�}?.., ; West General. Industrial <" STEM X E PLANNING COMMISSIOI STAFF PXPORT CUP 91-13 - VMLAND EMPIRL+ STAGES July 101 1991 Lr . Rage 2 } Awk E. Site Char&dteristi�.e The property contains a 948�-c:quare foot office and' a ,large hanger-type ,carport which ccvers_�an 1800 square foot concrete slab. A>small shed exists la& the s6uth end of the drive aisle.' The perimete of thei ,,t -S;jyand the driveway are fined with trees which have r�ti. =- been pruned. T}i,rA;rema no t of the site is vacant with"a'-7 �vel or dirt surface. /J F. Parking Calculations: 1 NuYaber of V. of Type Square Parking Spaces �s of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Office 948 1/250 4 4 Fleet Storage 10 buses 1/vehicle. 10 10 .. 14 14 *`Applicant states they havf:15 employees;` hence, 15 spaces will be required. r� II, ANALYSIS: A. General: The `applicant intends to use the°site f-'' a buq charter service" which falls under the. category` of Fleet Storage as defined1111*y the Industrial Specific Plan. The office 'wi 11. 1 ! used for dispatching and bookkeeping and the 'yard will bezlised for parking. Light maintenance of the buses will be conducted in the existing carport. Proposed business hcurs are from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. seven days per week;,however, some roaches may return to the site{as late as 11_p.m. due to the nature of the clia�ter. In addition to the bus charter ' ;1 service, the applicants have also proposed- to use the western portion of the site for the storage of recreational vehicles which is a permitted use within the subarea. H. Compatibility of Uses: Subarea 3 is zoned far'. General Industrial activities. such as manufacturing, whiles%le, storage and distribution, and contractor's offices and).yards. The property toy the west is a receiving point fclr-recyclable goods and aself-storage facility exists to the m-,wuth,e ,Given the nature of the surrounding,uses,; staff does notanticipate any land use conflicts with present or fitture"uses. \ C. Upgrading of the Site: The site was originally developed prior to the incorporation of the City and does not comply with current develc,�ment standards. Therefore; it must be upgraded, to bring it into. conformaw..e with the minimum requirements of the district. The applicant has already made several improvements to the site including: i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-13 - INLAND EMPIRE STAGES July 10,_ 1991 Page 3 Y. 1. Replacement of a chain link fence with a screen wall along Sth Street. 2. Pruning of vegetation, and weed abatement. 3• New stucco and paint on the buildingand carport.'_ Additional, improvements propj'ad'to be r-, ',fired prior to occupancy include: � I 1. Paving of employee parking paces. 2- Replacement of the existing, chain link;fence with a' wrought'iron gate. 3. Installation of landscaping along Sth Street. I In addition to the above aesthetic improvements, the Engineering Division has recommended that the project be conditioned to dedicate an„additional-6 feet of right-of-way, along 8th Street. Due to 1', cost:.involved in undergrounding utilities and constract,�,, street improvements 'at this particular location, a 14,___�greement is required to ensure that street, improvements will •,)be, constructed when adjaiient properties develop or whin further development is propose,,3 on this property. All of the above improvements have been incorporated into the ?attached Resolution as Conditions of Approval. Completion of', these improvements will be required prior to occupancy of ti site. "1 D. Environmental Assessment; gnon review of Part I of the Snit..+,al Study and completion of Part II of the knvironmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to, the proposed use. III. FACTS FCR FINDINGS: The Commission must make.all of the following findings in-order to approve this application, A. "That the proposed use is ifi accord with the General Plan, the ' objectives of the"'Development Code, and the`purposes`nf the Industrial Area Specific •Plan subarea in, which the site is located. B. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public $1 health, safety, or welfare or materially, injurious t roperti o pes or improvements in the vicinity, I s f df \, _ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF P-7PORT CUP 91-13 - INLni]D"EMPIRE,$TAGES July 10, 1991 �< ,3 page 4t C. That tne=`proposed use ,complies with each of the ,applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Spe-Cific Plaa. r, IV. CORRESPaNDENCE: This f' Z;'1em has-been advertised as a public hearing iii the `!tland Valley Daily Bn1letin newspaper,, the property,hair( been Posted, and auticesjwere sent to the adjacent property owners z, cxithin306 feet of the, project. V. RECOMMDATIOh: Staff 'recommends that the.'R1am3ng Commission .; approve Condi�+ioiial Use Kermit 1-13 through adoption cif vae� attached-, Resilu-ion of Approval and issuance"-,of a Negative Declaration. Respec ly submitted, 0 Brad le City Planner BB:SR.ds f!� Attachments: Exhibit "A- Letters from the ApFr icant fir- Exhibit t B";',Loaaticn'Mao i Exhibit "Cl!,,- Site Plan Exhibit "D" Concept`ual Landscape Plan., 4, (J .x 7 - 1 1 j URSAND I O LAND I TO TRANSPORTATION i 959 CLARK STREET • QPLAa ID;CALIFORNIA 9I786 0 +714)946.8707 April b, 1991 City of ;rancho Cucamonga Office of Planning City Hall Rancho Cucamonga, Ca., 91780 Gentlmen: Pursuant,.to our application for a c•)nd'itional use hermit and business license we would'iike to offer the fol'lowil',g' information to aid in your process of establishing our meeting your criteria for operating in Rancho Cucamonga. We have purchased the property on March 1, 19.91 aV�;.67 Eighth St, Rancho Cucamonga for our coach yard.. We now have ten mots:- coaches which are used "for,charter-groups composed of senior citizens; youth groups�,f and city employees. We employ a total of 15 employees. We do-not,dG any retail operations from the site. The yard is for the light maintenance of the coaches, and for dispatching and bookkeeping., Our usual hours are from 7 a.m. until 6 p.m. seven days a week. Occasionally Amtrak or the military may have a charter out later, and sometimes we operate trips' to evening`bal i,,games that do not get back until 11, p.m. Wa wish to house the coaches at the facility, have parking for our drivers, and in the future to possibly store additional coaches at the yard. We do not know whether you wish to classify us as Automotive, rental, and leasing, which is what our operation is, which would not require a conditional use permit, or.the category of Fleet storage, which would require a conditional use permit at this location. Our coaches are all late model MCI equipment, which are very quiet, meeting all standards set by state and federal government regulations. We feel+hat our operation at this location willDbe an asset to the surroundingarea. We have been locatedfor the past 7 years near the Montclair Plaza and have been good neighbors with the surrounding retail environment. With the land at this location being 2.94 acres we would like to be able to rent part of the facility for storage that is compatible with your needs to offset the land cost. This is not a requirement of our occupancy, but our needs will utilize less than l acre. Ys appreciate your consideration. Should you desire any further information please do not hesitate to contact me. ITEM: (,UP CI I-13 0i nc,' y ���� A_5 'riTLE: L ETT52 Ftiara At®c►tnut Walt Neff, -Financial Officer EXHMrr:A-I SCALE: URSAND INLAND, TO TRANSPORTATION 959 CLARK STREET o-UPLAND,OALiFORNIA 91786 • (714)946-870 May 20, 1991 Z Mr. Steven Ross MAY 2 x Project Pl ar_.ner Community Development Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca., 91729 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-13,, Dear Mr. Ross: With this letter we have included a site plan for our proposed business i at 9567 Eighth St. To respond to the completeness comments of your letter of April 30 we address the following requests; I. Planning Divisj,,/�r 1. We havetgovided you with a detailed site plan for our jprojected uses of tpe property as per your request. l� 2. Storage wi a, be limited to RV related vehi4ies, no heavy equipment, no commercial` trucks, no commercial trailers. We want the property to remain lightly utilized and to have minimal coming and going of vehicles on the property. We may decide not to have any RV parking but would like the option at this time from,your office. 3. The office structure has a total square footage of 948. 4. The site plan has been detailed more completely than the original and does include the shed near the end of the driveway. 5. We wish to not disturb the existing trees on the property as with proper pruning and shaping add much to the appearance of the land. 6. We are in the process at this time of haying a landscape architect prepare plans for the streetscape utilizing stonescape for a dry creek area with trees and plants which utilize minimal water usage as per information you supplied to us. We ill provide these plans to you as soon as possible. a 7. Mr. Coleman and you have allowed us to retain the chain kink fence facing 8th Street. 8. The site plan indicates the paving needed to fulfill our needs with regards to the motor coaches and vehicles, EA -2. 7 I. INNAND URSAND EMPIRE T©TRANSPORTATION 959 CLARK STREET o'UPLAND,CALIFORNIA 91786 • (714)946.8707 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES L CUP 91-13 1\ <; Page 2 9. On the site plan we have shown the location of the trash enclosure. We have been provided with-approved construction needs for the enclosure by your office and will construct the,,enclosure accordingly. 10. General maintenance has began on the'property.. 'We have now replastered the building with a spanish texture, stri and repainted all doors and trim, pruned low hanging branches from the trees, shaped the ivy, and weeded the property. We will continue to make visual improvements-to the property. 11. We wish to have a dieser! tank installed on the property. The location will beat the/end of the drive. II. Engineering Division 1. The engineering Office, per Barrye Hanson has elected to put . a lien on the property for improvements to street and utility_ poke undergrounding. 2. The drainage report will-not be required due to the minimal amount of'paving. We did have a report done by Ken Linville Engineering in regards to the drainage to the south 3. Line of sight designs will not be required since no street improvements k.i till be made at this time. 1 4.` Ken Linville is now preparing a 6 foot right-of-way dedication to provide Rancho with a 66 foot width for 8th Street. 5. The drive-way analysis will not be done due to street improvements being waived. Feel free to contact us at your convenience for any further information or requests that we can provide to complete this application process. S1 lY, n t '�f /�— 0 F-Yowir A'3 �J 1 � .'•}}Ty.i{:.:�••i\++t t \'\� `• i;:`•} +�;;••+:.•••.' ^ K`+} ,,' ,fib, W t � a CL CD \ L 5` '.S;t• 2:2 ®allAj �£ j Iloilo 77 CC Ank ••:`.iszi:� T;•�`. v}. \�+kN S\s%:rtc L� � ,t'C'•:c`y � ^ t T` 2 +T w Fs khh h C L ��}� L -•i � } `'.i }::•:t�h}i:i�$ 1. U �.T• + S. 12A,ILROAD T" -G I 6RouvL'ewr�C - � t -------------- I �+�T / � e(�16u �p►roScAPtN4 � � 1 sT.'T RFEs, tYpu..J — P i 0 " G ,f AIL 0 `t c^ W G CSEE EX�4t8tT C-Z) - r OF 016;. UOAMONG'-A I TElbi: G L P PLANNflVG bj t lON \/� EXRIBTT:c-t "SCALE:E: Z 1 q4 � v'i� 1 tt ls b Z,S y1 A `A/or st c�� utKr D tsOP R11s un+cFxs Gta�taes� ?RUEJ7 _�. lw �, �b1C, 43USa5 s\��i'r.tr ® ' �Tts/il�f,� dultylNG p .{ rmm: CITY Off, , GUP �t-t3 C y �� LJC�tlYONO�. PLANLa�Md:` IgTISION TrrLE: SrrE PLAN- V.,Z., fioj � v .:`, mrr:O-Z SCALE . i uj � wwIvaIle Q bcA �3 U r. 00 u y ��= 1.14 A � o RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION;/ F THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIrORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE Ji PERMIT NO. 91-13 TO ALLOW A,-BUS GARTER SERVICE WITHIN AN c EXISTING BUILDING ON 3 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 3, G? THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-171-38. _ ,1r A. ,Recitals. (i) Inland Empire Stages has filedan application for the issuance_ of the Conditional Use Permit #o. 91-13 as described in the title;of thJ,_...} Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Cen�c.,!nal;;Use Permit request is ri�tferred to as "the application." U/ ) On the 10th of Ju�2' 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing...,on`the application and concluded said hearing on that date.` (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adopt on of th s;;esolution have occurred. l' % E. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts -,._set forth in theRecitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. c' 2. Based upon substantial 'evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 10, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission herby specifically finds as follows: (a)' The application applies to,property located at 9567 ;Sth Street with >a street frontage of-220 feet and lot depth of 589 feet and is presently improved with an office, carport, shed, wall, and a concrete drive aisle: (b) To the north of the subject site is 8th Street; the property to the south of that site consists of sehf-storage buildings, the property to the east is a concrete contractor,s office and yard, and the property to the west is a recycling center. \� D �- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-13 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES' July 10, 1991 Page 2 Sf s (c) The application contemplates the use of the sit4: fora bus charter rvice, including the storaq"\ and minor m;aijAenance" of 1t7 motorcoaches, enj a maximum of 15 employees. (?.2) The. site ,`does not comply with cm%rent development standards and must be upgraded to meet the minimum requirements of the Development Code and Industrial Area Spek4fic. Plan. 3. Basedupon the substaatial evidence presented to thisCoamission during the above-referenced public hearing ,and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this"—omuission hereby finds and concludes as follows:. (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the-objectives of the Development Cade, anda the purposes of the, district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed Fuse, together with the conditions j applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to theypublic health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or- improvements in the;vicinity. (c) That,the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. Affihk 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental- Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negati"te Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and above, this Comminsion hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.. `; = Planning Division: 1) This approval shall apply to the fleet storage of charter buses only. Storage of other vehicles, equipment, or materials is prohibited. RV storage is a permitted use not ' governed by this permit. 2) if the operation of.the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses-or operations, including but not limited to, noise, this Conditional Use Permit shall be brouajht :bu* c tefore the Planning Commission ° for consideration and 7possiblt� termination of the use. J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. n CUP 91-13 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES" iulp00, 199_1 Page 3 3) occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform EF41ding Code and State Fixe Marshal's regulations have been complied wl�hc Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District anc the Buildf�g and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected `for compliance prior to �1 occupancy. I 4) The Sth Street froptage shall be irrigated -and f planted to meet all „City Standards. , A 1�w%dscape and irrigation plan, signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect, shall be ssubmitted to the City Planner for, :. review and approval prior to 'the issuance of building permits. 5) A wrought iron gate or decorative metal gate e shall replace the existing chain link fence. Q) The parking lot shall be striped per City, Standards to include a minirtum.,of 15 automobile S,I parking spaces. MW 1 � 1 7) All hazardous materials and wastes', including 1ti but not,.Iiit"ed to, motor oil, brake fluid, - J transmission fluid, -and freon shall properly J disposed of,in accordance with state and local regulations. I 8) All improvements required by these conditions shall ba ,completed prior to any bus storage use Of the.project site. 9) Pursuant to provisions of California Pubic p ,Resources: Code Section 21084(b); this application 'shall not be operative, vested, or final nor will building„permits be issued or a sap recorded unt,4,1 (11 the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardinoi and (2) any and all n, required filing fees assessed pursuant to . California Fish and.,Game Code Section 711.44 together with, any required har..11ing charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The appYlcant shall provide X -'r�f i i� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOhUTION 110: 3 t CUP 91-13 - INLAND EMPIRE STAGES Suly 10,' 1991 ` Page A .: }he Planning Department :with a stamped and. confirmed copy of the NOD together Vith a receipt showing that all feeshave been paid. r In the event this applicati�p�\is determined exempt from such Eiling�ifees"puisuan't to the ,provision of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption„ this condition shall be Aeexee-,\pul1 ' and-,void Engineering bivision: 1) An additional 6 feet o, ight-of-way.dedication' will be required to-,pre,.. de a total width of 66, feet for Sth Street. t\ �y 2) The required street 'improvements and parkway } landscaping may be deferred uzidl improvements are constructed on adjacent properties or r1 further develo ment'of this' p y p pro ert as: deemed r_='appropriate by the ,City Engineer. 'A lien agreement is regE,red to secuxe the improvements. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certlt}tito the adoption ` of this Resolution. P.PPROVED AND AEGPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Larry T. McNiel', Chairman - v ATTEST: J� Brad Buller,, Secretary t 4` PLANNING COMMISSION Ris6tbTION Ntti;. ` Cup 91-13 --INLAND EMPIRE STAGES-' �\ Jule. 10, 1991 - Page 5 I, Brad Bullee, Secretary of the Planning -;ommission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutioz, was duly and regularly introduced,. Passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the . City of Ranchei'Cucamonga, at a =-egular meeting of the Planning Commission-held r on the 10th day,of July, 1991, bg, the following vote-to-wit: A,�E5: COMMISSIONERS: a NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS: o t F: f U i °e �04Yt �R CiEPARTMENT F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT-, ^� MULMMM 'm u" CONRO"'ITIONS ai IAN IJARw PROJECT#'. GoNIDITIONAL US9- PEt:rvti r SUBJECT: j'L6rLit; `56- RTN 'Sr2mT__� _ IrT APPLICANT,, I N-NJD EmGtRE Sr A&9S LOCATION: 95(0 BT S TV.i:IZT Those items checked are Conditions of A7prodal_ i j' APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE Pl DIVISION, (714)ii-9t'61, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIOf...., l_rfr h Time Limits Ssmsla£sn 12�te 1. Approval shall expire,utliess extended by the Planning Commission,N building pennits aro —�--� not issued orapproveduse has notoommencedwitNn 24 monthstmmlhe date ol.approval. 2. Development/Design RG%iew shall i3e approved priorto_/ r _J- 3. Approval of Tentative Trot No. Is$minted subject to the approval of _.J i 4. Thedsvelo ershallcommenci�,, rt ate In. •J—J-- M. P ?a �P I participated in,or ccriummF«tl,'a Meft-Roos Community Fadilleo Distrm(CFD)for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protec an Dls t to firmnoe construction srWor m;ainterance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall Us located,designed,arrt built to all specifiozetions of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Pmtsckion Olstrict,and shag become the OistrWs property upon cony leficn. The egjipment shed be selected.by the District in accordance with No needs.in any building of a station,t."develog-jr alait comply widh all appiicabis laws and requ` tt.The CFD shall be formed by fhad Dk'VM and the developer by t*tktw recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the ffr;9t map'orthe Issuartce of buadNtg psrmft, whichever comas -1_1 first,the applicant sty consent to, or particilDete in,the eatablishrrrent of a M91lo-Roos Community Facilities District for the 4-Vna9ion and maintenance of necessary;5cftaol fa,,ildies. However,t: any school distriel has previously estatAshed such a Community Facilities District.the applicant shall, in the alternative,consent to the annexation at the project site into the territory of such exLstirw DIsM pftf to the recordation of tt•a final map or the issuance of building hermits,whichever comas firm.Further,if it*affectod^x;7,D l dtistrict has not formed a Mello-Roos CorrimUnity Facii t e District withintwelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or Issuance of buildhig perrstls for said project,this condition shall be deemed null and voui. SC•2/91 1 or 12 P"o �a CvP gt-t3 1 This condition;shall be waived if the Cfi+receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior,o recordation of the final map,or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is J involved,written cerlificatmniromihe affected water district that adequate sewerandwater facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days priorto final map approvai inthe case of subdlvsion orprior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B.Site Development 1. 1.s site shall be developed and ratip ntained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, at'ehitectorate! n landscaping,slgA- on file in the Planning Div Ion,the'conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations,and 4A& Aawi= Speaific,Plan Rissaaed�:omrtuuity. V 2. Pear to any use of She project site or bu-siness acttivlty cit:dt lanced.thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satlsf!lon of the City Planner. ✓3. Occupancyof the facility shall riot com",ncev�.RsuchtimeasallUniformBulldngCodeand State Fire Marshall's regulations have. ,'s,o.rMlted with. Prior to occupancy,plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucanior as Fire Protein District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildirN shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations Incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits tip S. All site,grading,landscape,Irrigation,and street improvemant pans shall becoordli0tedfor consistency priorto issuance of any permits(sudi as grading.irsetemovai,ertcmachn'�znt, building etc.),or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom tot subdivision,or approved use has commermed,whi0mver coms first. 6 Approval of this request shall not waive complianev v ttt all,sections of the Development —1 Code,all other applicable City Ordinances,and app%cat fe Community Plarmlor Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Perrnit issuance. 7. A detai►ed on-site tightiM pi2n shall be reveawed and applaved by the City Planner and Shenff s Department(989-WW1)prior to the Issuance of building perms lts- SUC4 fan shall indicate style,iliumhlaMn,location,heigftt, and method of".1dIng so as not to adversely affect adjacent propeflisd. e. if no centralized trash receptacles are provided,all trash pick-up shall be for individual units J� with all receptacles shielded from public vieer. ►/� 9. Trash recsptaele(s)are required and shag meet Ctiy slandarda. Th,4,tinal design,bcations, and the number of trash recaplacbs sisalI bee.9#4 tp Ckyy Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. ✓_10.All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers,AC condensers,etc.,shall J—1 be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walis, benning, andlor,landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. tom/ sc-2/e t 2 or 12 P'oied No..EVP 91-13 .Completion Dam, 11.Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adapted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. r/ 12.Ail building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, J_J- including proper illumination. 13.A detailed plan indicating trail widths,maximum slopes,physical cond1kms,fencing,and weed control,in accordance with City Master Trail drawings,shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval p6o, ,?approvalandrecordationoftheFinalTractMapandprior to approval of street improvement'iand grading plans.Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails,including fencing and drainage devices,in conjunction with street improvements. 14..The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions(CC&Rs)shall not prohibitthe keeping of equine _JJ— animals where zoning requirementsforthe keeping of said anirtimishave been met.Individual lot owners in subdivision shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners'associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15.The Covenants,Condiflons;and Restrictions(CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _J_J Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval' of the Planning;and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney.They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of buildift,panits,whichever occurs first.A recorded copy shall be provided to the City E--7igi6i ar, 16.Aliparkways,open am es,and landscaping shall be permanentlynr,-!ntained bythepppertya owner, homeownen;i association,or other means acceptable to the Cfty, Proof of this` landscape maintenance shall be subr fitted for CkyPlanner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17.Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that Bach lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of i a solar energy system.The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits,whichever comes first.The easements shag prooliblit the casting of shadows by vegetation,structures,fixtures or arty+otherobject,except for ullitty wires and similar obyacts,pursuant to Development Code"Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18.The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and maintained In In accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Penntr:lo. Any further nod:iicalior is to the site uiduding but not limited to.extort l afterations and/or interior akeratlons which affect the exterlorof the bulkdi brslructuros irrovalof'landmark trees,demolition,relocation,reconstrucl! IrIiitilldingsor structures,l.,ihangestothesite, shall require a modification to the Histortc L iwitark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission reviews and approval. C. Building Design 1. An r Yernativ x e energy system is�eequired to provide darrr®sflo trot wafer for all dwelling units _J.—J-- and'for heating any swimming pool or spa,unless aiiher aftertative energy systems are deh;:vystratedtobeof equivalent capacity and efficlency.All swimming pools Installed at the time 4winitial development shall be suppismented with solar'heatirg. Details shall be inpkudad in the building plans and shall be submitted::,My Planner review prior to the Issuance of building permits: 2. All di Ilellittgs shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treaty;ant,detailing and increased;delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review'and approval prior to issuance of bu'Idirtg permits. �l! SC•2/93 3 or 12 +� e Qvmdeuon Date,. 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners'Association shall be suomitted forI }I) City P(gnner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Jai ✓�4. All roof appurtenances,including aircond'dioners and otherro�f mounted aPl� n9 equip 'nt and/or _— J- projsclions,shall be shieldedfrom viewand the sound buffered fmm'ad;acentp--¢�rtles and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening st,.111 be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfactie fof the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. ' D. Parking and Vehicular Access(Indicate details on building plans) _✓ 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 teet and shall 7_J contain 912-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall(including aurb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured.pavemeint across circulation aisles shall be —1—�-- provided throughout the development to cinnectdweliingstunitsibuildingswith open spaces/ S plazas/recreational uses. 11 f 3. All parking spaces s=nall be double striped per CRy standards and all driveway aisles, entrances,and exits 1 hall be strd per City standards. 4. All units shall be proakded wr h garage:door openers it driveways are less than 16 feet in depth from back of sidewalk' I 5. The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions shall restrldthe storage of recreational vehicles —�=-�— on.his site unless they are the p:'incipat source of transportation torthe owner and prohibit parking on interior circulat9on aisles other than in designated vlskor parking areas. J 6. Pians for any security gates shall be subr;►itted for the Cittr Planner, City Engineer,and -/—J Aancho Cu.amonga Fire Protection Dlstrid review and approval prfocto issuance of building nermits. E. landscaping(for publicly maintained In areas,refer to Section H.) 1. A detailed tandsrape and Irrigation plan,inAM19 slope planting and model home land-map- _lam ing In the case of;rasldential;deveEa ment, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architectand submitted for City Planner review and approval prWto the issuanaaof tinkling permits or prior final map approval in 1)is case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing tress required to be preservei,16 p4m shall be protected with a co'nstructlon barrier in alxordanee with the Municipal t:aCIS'Sectbn 19.08.110,and so noted on thegradtnpplans. T119Id bond!those trees tobepresirtvedinplace and new locations for transplanted trees shall beshownonthedgtaIIedtaylcfs( ®iarrs.The applicant shallfollowailotthearborisrs recommendations preset vvatiori,trartsgalantkig and trimming methoc%. If :.r 3. AmInImmof vtiithin the protro treesperg "�acae,cort�r ofthafoliowing sizes,shaHbeprovided —l_.1 ject: box or urger. SG-38-inch box or larger, %-24-inch box or larger %-15-gattori;avid %u S gallon. 4. A rrdnfmum Of %Of tree planted within the project:hall be specimen size trees- 24-Inch box or larger. S. Within parking lots,trees shall W planted at d rate of one 15-gallon trees for every'three, i parking stalls,sufficient to shade 600/6 of the parking area at sotar noon on August 21. ,l SC-2/91 4ort2 6. Trees shall be planted in areas ofpublicview adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one Q�orvim nay: tree per 30linear feet of building. 7. All private slope banks 5 feetor lessin vertical-Pelght and of 5-1 orgreaterslope,but less than _(+/_'AVAL 2:1 slope,shall be,at minimum,irrigated ak'andscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting reg6ked by 64 section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. All private slopes in exces s ol'S feet,but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 orgreater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows:one 15-gallon or largersize tree per each 150 sq.ft.of slope area,I-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq.ft.of slope area,and appre priale ground cover.in addition,slope banks in excess of 8 feetin vertical height and of 2:1,orgreater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq.ft.of slope area.Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane.Slope planting required by this;, section shall Inciude a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to 11 occupancy. i } 9. Fur single family residential development,all slope p"ngand Irrigation shatlbe continu- ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developeruntil each Individual unit l is sold and occupied by the buyer.Priorto releasing occupanoyfor those units,aninspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to detertr,'i�that they are:,in satisfactory condition.' 10.Forli-wilt family residential and non-residential development,property owners are respon- Bible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site,as wall as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shag be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in.a healthy and thriving condition, and shalt receive regular pruning, fertilizing,mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the data of damage. Aak 11.Front yard landscaping shall be required perthe Development Code and/or .This requirement shag be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12.The'final design of the perimeter,oarkways,walls,tandiscaping,and sidewalks shall be +/J included in the required landscape plans and shag be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated foroonsistency with any parkway landscaping plan whictiirnaybe required by the Engineering Divis n. 13.Speoiai landsca;,,e features such as mounding aJba;i—oc,r„ specimen glze trees,meander ire sitlewaYls(with horizoraal change),and Inlsiisgled landscaping,Is required along f4.Land it � /r scaping aril Irrigation system Mq%red to be installed withhin the pubk rtgtit-of-way on _j__/ the perimeter of this project area shatl be continuousiy mt road by the developer. I S.AD walls shall be provided with decorative treatment.If located In pubft maintenance areas, fJ�� the design shag be coordinated w ah the Engineering Dmsiom. 16.7ree maintenance criteria shag be develapatt acid submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to Issuaroce of building per,h#s. Thaws criteria shall encourage the natural gr*Mh Characteristics of the selected tree species. Landscaping and irrigation shag be designed to conserve water thR"h the principles of _J_I Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of tfte Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 1 sc.2/e t 3 of 12= ProFj�ect xo. (,up qI^Ia'. F.Signs Yzw etion Dam• AMk-1. The signs indicated on the subrr.tted plans are conceptual only andnot apart of this approval. Any sigos.proposed for this:dfevelopment shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall ; requirv'w, '(ate application and,approval by on prorto installation of the Planning Division .f igns•�. � 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(aj shall be provided for apartment,condominium,or townhomes Prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.En:,onmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusherproject in a standard fonnatas determined by the City.Planner,priorto accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Spacial Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by fle City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property, 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the,Fo:Ahili F,Teeway project in a standard format as determined by the Ctty Planner,prior to imptirg`a cash deposit an any property,` t_ 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted forCity Planner review and approval prior to the J---J— issuance of buildin g perms. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise TW attenuation to below 45CNEL,the Wilding materials and constriction techniques provided, and if appropriate,verify the adequ4by of the mitigation measures.Thdbuiidl g plans will be checked for conformance with thaf'mitigatian measures contained in the final report. - H.Other Agencies 1. F.Mrgency secondary arxes'sh nil be provided Inaclmrdancewith Rancho Cucamonga Fire Pb,.i Won District Standarl8. 2. Emergency accessshall be provided,maintenance free and clear,a minimumof26feetwide 1_ 1. at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho.Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to issuance of b::itarg permits for combusii�ie construction, evidence shalt be J—J— submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that ternimrary water supply for 3 fire protection Is available,pending completion of required Ore protection system. 4. The applicant shelf contact the U.S.Postal Service to deferm ne the appropriate type and location of mail boxes.Muld-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate ligtdkag..The f rlal location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subjtrot to City Planner review and approval prior ` to the issuance of building permits. S. for projects using septic tank facilities,written certification of acceptability,Including ail _I supportive information,shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits,and prior to W*Mance of building permits. SC•2/e1 8 of't2� r PRiw o.:cUP A 1-.13 ce ,dkon,Nte: APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989.1863, FOR COMPLIANCE VWTH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1.Site Development f 1. The applicant shall cornplywith the latest adopted Uniform, Building CA�de,Uniform ll hani- —1—J cal Code,Uniform Plumbing Code,National Electric Code,and all otl&9r applicable codes, ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and,. applicable'handouts, 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for new residential dwelling unh(s)or major addition 1_--[— to existing unt(s),the applizant shall paydevelopmntfees at the established rate.Suchfees may include,but are not limited to:pity Beautification Fee,Park Fee,Drainage Fee,Systems Development Fee,Permit and Plan Checking Fees,and School Fees. ✓3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial devakprpWt or _;_J_, addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development,tees at the established rate. Such fees may include,but are not Bruited to:Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee,Sc iiol Fees,Pemtff and Pian Checking Fees. 4.Street addresses shy,,Qbeprvidedby the Suiktiing Official,aftertracUparcel map recordation and p,kr; issuance of building permits. J.Existing Struciurae 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances _J_J considering use,area,and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. ANAL �1i 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zvaQ1regulations for the intended use or the buiidingshall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed,filled artd/orcapped to comply with the Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilt164 afe to be located and shown on building plans submitted for _J building peen t application, K.Grading 1. Grading of the WNW property Shali be in accordance with the Unifditrr Building Code,City Grading Standards,and wed grading practices.The final grading plan shall be in substantial corde^pance with the approved grading plan. j 2. A,soils report shall t.a Prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the Slat*of California to perform mxh wore 3. The development is located within the soil erosion conmrol boundaries;a Soil Disturbance Perm.is required.Please alnfact San SemardktoCouttty Departmoraof Agriculture at(714) 3674111 forperrrit a.Vication.Docurnergationot such permit shag be submitted tothe City prior to the issuance of rough grading permlit. 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist artd suixntted at —J r the time of application for grading plan check. 5. The I inal grading plans shall be compWted and approved priorto imance of building permits. _J__J r SC-2/91 70f 12 CUP PIS Compleuon Dale:. _. 6. Asa custom-lot subdivision,IK5 following requirements shall be met: a.Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-sits -J---� drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b.Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto �—�— or over adjacent parcels,are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c.On-site drainage improvements,necessary for dewaterng and protecting the-subdivided —J--=� properties,are to be installed prior to issuance off�,uiidi permits for construction p ng pe upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows I ntering leaving,or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. \ d.Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submittt the Building and Safety —J-J— Division for approval priorto issuance of building and V,,,sdi,g permits,(This maybe on an incrementai or composite basis.) -' /' e.All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical"Ight awall be seeded with native grasses orplalned with ground coverfor erosion control uponc�(i I tiopofgradingor some other alternative method of erosion ooMrot shall be corrrpte It,k•4othe aatisfaatIon of the Building Official.In addition a permanent Irrigation syste vided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from wmpii'ance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 t of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTFE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714)989.1M,FOR WMPLIANCE TH THE FOL WING CONDITIONS: L.Dedication and Vehicular Accass 1.Rights-of-way and easer ants shall be dedicated to the City to all intedcr puV t streets, —,1—J community tails,public pasecs,public landscape areas,street trees,and public utainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative limp. Private easements for non-public facilities(cross-lot drainage,local feeder trails,etc.)shall be reserved as shown on the plans - amVortentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rWo-of-way on the perimeter streets —J—� (measured from street cennterfino): _j 6 totai fast,en S z N S rRCC T total feet on total feet on total feet on I 3. An irrevocaNe offer of dedication for_-factwideroadwayeasem>entshalibemade for all private streets or drives. 4. Non-vehicular access Shall be dedicated to the City for the folioaing streets: J_!_ t 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CCBRs _J_J— or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the Issuance of building permits,where to map is involved. SC-2ht aor,t3 f` it } . Cixnoimcm Dafe:... 6. Private drainage easements forcross-lot drainage shall beproviided andshallbe delineated or noted on the final map. __J___J_ _,tl _ 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction area on the _/__J— neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: TWO hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction rf(residential)buildings(or otherstrucWres)within those areas designated on t`e map as building restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lotto the adjacent lot through the 8. All existing easements tying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaim k or delineated on thA final map. "'i - 9. Easements for public sidewalks and Jr street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10.Additional street right-of-way shalt be dedicated along righttum lanes,to provide a minimum —/�— jof 7 feet measured from—_-,4 --1-c ubs.Lt cu;b adjacent sides�atk is used along the right turn lane,a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. d 11.The developershall make a good faith effortto acquire Me required off-site property interests =c necessary to construct the required public improvements,arx�.tt he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall,at feast 120 days prior to submittal of the igal map for approval,enter Into an agreement to complete the Improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquiresthe property Interests required fortheImprovements. Such agreement shall provide for paymerd by the developer of all costs incurred by the City toaoqu-b the off -site property interests required In connection with the subdivision.Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the fort of a cash deposit in the amount given in am appraisal report obtained by the Developer,at developer's cost.The appraiser shall have been approved by the City.prior to commencement of the appraisal. M.Street improventants 1. All public improvements(Interior streete,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos, J_) landscaped areas,etc.)shown on the p'_--�andfor tentative map shag be constructed to City Standards. Interior street Improvement hats include,but are not htidted to,curb and gamer,AC pavement,drive approacher.sidewalks,street fgMs,and street trees. 2.;.'A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement,within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be __j 1_ constricted for all half-soction streets. i/ 3. Construct tite following perimeter street improvements including,nut not United to: S1REErNAME CURB& AC. SIDE DRIVE SYREEr STIMEr COMM.MED CIHER OLMER PVWr WALK APPR. UGH18 _'1REES 7RAIL' t9tAND TN Qiw.c lJ,mM ✓ f V V r+ STRY CT .o SC-2/91 9of 12 `^ } v„ emm.e Gu h g t-13 A S4�IlQIeum Date, Notes:(a)Median island-^;Odes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c)1f so marked,side walk shall be curvilinear per STD.304. (d)if so marked,an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item.(e),Lanlsca�t+ Z4. Improvement plans and constructiot)c a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights,prepared by a regis- tared Civil Engineer,shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.Security shall be posted andan agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney i,arameeing completion of the public and/or private street improve- ments,prior to final map approval or tha issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way,fees shall ba,paid and a -/—/ ;instruction permit shalt be obtained from the City Engineer's Office i',i addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping,marking,traffic,.dreet name signing,and Interconnect condult _1.—J_ shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signaloondult with pull boxes shall be installed on any new constructionorreconstiuction of major,secondary or cotrector streets which intersect with other major,second.,y or collector streets for future traffic signals.Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3feet outside of BCR,ECR orany other approved by the City Engineer Notes: J_,. (i)All pull boxes shall be No.6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. Wheel chair rams shall be installei on all four comers of intersections per City =ram Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. = f. Existing City roads requiring construction shah remain open to traffic a all times with adequate detours during coWniction.AstrWi,'bsure,pernkmaybe required.Acash deposit shalt be provided to cover the co5f f grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the constnucl 3n to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drNnap flows shall not am sidewalks.Under sidewalk drains shall be _J_J installed to City Standards,except for single family lots. 1 It. Handtcap access ramp design shall be as%vecatted by the City Engimer. I. Street names 0J be approved by the City Planter priarto submittal for first plan check. __J__J S.Street improvement plans per Ciij Standards for all pcivato streets shall be provided for' _J_1 review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the pri- 0 vats streets, fees SUN be paid and construction permks shall be obtained from the CRY. Engineer's Office in addition to arty other permits required. 6.Street trees,a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger,shall be installed per City Standards in acodmance with the City's street tree program lu l+`l SC•2/9 t 10 or 12 P.S.GUPgI-13 ' G.,nplecon D3lG.. L 7.Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. J_J - a. On collector or larger streets,lines of sight:shall 6e plotted for all project.intersections,. Including driveways.Waifs,signs,and slopes shall be located outside the dines of sight. Landscaping and other obstnictions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street Intersections shall have their noticeability improved,usually by Jam— moving the 2+/-closest street trees on each side'awayfromthe street and placed in a street tree easement. S.A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: l—/— 9.All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the �--�— issuance of building permits: N.Public Maintenance Areas ✓ 1.A sepaate set of landscape and Irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards --J— shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and app?r°oval prior to final m— proval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.f"llowing landscaf.;v parkways, Willannexed;af+se l andscape Maintenance District, A e--tlk aa.rr/�A.Z nn z.A signed consent and waiverfomn to join andlorformthe appropnale Landsc m and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer priorto final map approvator Issuance ofbuilding permits whichever occurs_first.Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. r 3.All required public landscaping and irrigation systems sisalibo continuously maintained bythe J� developer until accepted by the City. 4.Parkway larscscapli thetcilowing street(s)shah cordorrn to the results of the respective _J—I Beautification Master Pion: O.Dr3lnago and FI*W Contrdl 1. The project(or portions thereof)is located within a Flood Hazard Zone;therefore,flood J protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civii Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. i 2.It shall bo the deveopee$responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone _J�J designation removed from the project area. The develoWs engimer shall prepare all necessary reports,plans,and hydrologiclhyd No calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR)shall be obtalrwd from FEMA prior to Mal map ap?roval or issuance of building permits,whichever oocw-s first.A Letter of Map Revision"(LOMR)shalt be issued by F7MA pdorto occupancy or ovement acceptance,whicheveroccurs first, 3.A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the CV y Engineer prior to final `=:J_ / map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer: sc-s/9t i'. ; �4.A permit from the County -food Control District Is required for work within its right-ol•way. Completion Date: 5.Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature-tree trunk. J—I 6.Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows In the even of a blockage In a sump catch basin on the public street. P.Utilities 1.Provide separate utility services to each Fatcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, J � gas,electric power,telephone,and cable TV(all underground)in accordance with the Utility' Standards.Easements shall be provided as required. 2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utHhiea as nor=ary. J 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet 116 requirements otthe J-1 Cucamonga County Water District(CCWD),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protegiion District. and the Environmental Health Department of the County of Sin Berrardirto.A letter of- compliance from the CCWD Is required prior to final map approval orissuancett permits, whichever occurs first. Q.General Requirementsand Approvals 1 The separate parcels wntained,wk?A the project boundaries shall be legally combined Into �---� one parcel prior to Issuance of tic.'- g permits. 2.An easement for a join use driveway shall be pmvvided prior to final map approval or Issuance of building pereiits,whichever occurs first,for. 3.Prior to approval of the final map a deposh shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cos€of apportloning,tit assessrme;js Under Assessment District among the newly created parcel 4.Etlwanda/San:Sevaine Area Regional Mainline.Secondary Regional,avid Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issusnce it no maps involved, 5.Permits shall be obtained from the following age:xdes for work within their right-df-way; 6.A signed consent and waiver form to join andtor form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities OkWd shall t p,�%d with the City Envineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits.whictts, er occurs tint Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. j 7..Priorto finalization of any development phase,sufficient improvement plans st-A be r om• _IJ— I pleted beyond t1sa phase boundaries to assum secondary awess and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the Clly Engineer.Phase boundaries shag correspond to,lot lines shown t on the approved tentative map. SC-2/91 12 of 12 0 Daniela, Component�"'.'-Exchange Inc. r79529 8th Street Rancho Gucamc�ga, CA 91'�'4R;_U.S.A (714)944.0025 TWX:910.587.1666 r Planning Commission y Y.O. Box 807 6-26 91 p Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 y 4ubjzctc Environmental assessment-and conditional use pe..-.mit. 91-18 Inland Empire State. ;, { own the property directly to the west of 9567 8th St. Since Inland Empire,.,Stages_pn_ based the property, their improvements has given that location the nest appearance on 8th St. between Haven and Vineyard. They have 9 buses and only will perform light maintancie un the ro ert In m o anion the would,,-,he ideal neighbors.p P y- Y P� .' Y ' The area is zoned General Industrial and x�<,is'beyond,my comprpheation as to'why you would waste the taxpayersaoney by-.re�lammending a nesative declaration-and forcing hearings. } Vey truly yours, i Lew C: Daniels Le-D:cr % F _ T� r L L OU 5 July 9 71991 �,. CItr QF�cPaGtrO CLI AM0NCA w City of Rancho Cucamonga . .`Planning Dept. ` JUL 1,® $f P.O. Box #807 7 Fanc2i6 Cucamonga, CA. ,91729 ! u ri 11 Dear Mr. Steven Ross: � The site for the new location of the Inland Empire Sta.gE Lihiq, r.,. 95? 8th. St, is a'`welcome.;a:sr--t to Rancho Cuoamonga, serving, the community- especially our-senior citizens.Y >` The need for transportation in this area is great. This company ty is most sufficient, the quality and integrity of the company is outstanding. The equip meet and safety factor `Ls most importpnt incl!,ding their crevr of very professional drivers . The sensor population will appreciate and benefit from their services. Personally, I'have been in the travelQbusineas primarily) senior group travel for thj) past.eleven years, having been .associated with Inland,.for the past five years.. This will be a most convenient location for all concerned,4 Very truly yours, Lois J. Hetzel II� - r c I r / rig X i r ��. � 98W Baseline#148 Alta Loma,CA.'91701 (714j 980-'5123 —='�- . inienez C®nc�de gn rucf r� na ". (719)989-3615 tic, 4;=,5, 92 c8': �.. June 28, 1991". " CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 'CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAE;ONGA, CA 91730� a Attn: Steven Ross - Planning Department Re: Inland tmpir4 Tours &'TranspoYwation 9567 Sih Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear mi. noes: We have been informed that Mr. WaltAeff will, be"moving his' business to the above referenced address, ong". My property ty is located' east of his at 9563'8th Street in,Rancho;Cucali '. I recently met with Walt. and was imDressed with him`both Personally andProf essian rity I loo k forward to having him.as a business neighbor,. I£ '!- can be of„any assistance please call me at {710 989-3615. Respectfully, J.D. Jimenez Asti President JDJ/rk lit ---1; 9583 8th Street,Rancho Cu6shion_M,CA 91730•At?.Box 307,Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 1 AA X 714 980-35?� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi+OUGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 10, 1991 's TO; Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission"' FROM; Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Betty A. Miller. Associate Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIROMMENiA L ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13939 WILLIAM acre s s t n e aw Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Highland Avenue west of Etiwanda Avenue API: 225-151-19, 32 33, 34 I. PRaJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION; A. Action Re jested Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map R�'s ` o"i—i wn on`Exhibit "T' B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 11.3 acres` Parcel 2 8.0 acres Total TT acres /!1 C. Existing Zoning: Low Residential r _ 0. Surrounding Land Use: North Vacant Softh - Single samily residences E_ V East - Vac ant _t West w Vacant E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North low Residential South Low Re ldential, Victoria Community Plan East Very Low Residential, Etiwanda Special Plan West tow Residential and Open Space, F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes to the south a .percen "77-11 ood protection levee crosses the site at a diagonal ;from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this parcel map is to create two separate parcels. The- southerlyparcel (No. '2) will be sold to Cal trans as rigght-of-way for the future Rtate 30 Freeway. The northerly parcel No 1) will be further 1 ITEM Y oad 4 PLANNING'COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 13919 - THE WILLIAM-LYON CO ��~^ U. 3uly, 10, 1991 P4ge;2 - subdivided . in the future ror residential - development. The r_util ity,, undergrounding along Highland Avenue and the parkway mprevements along Stable Falls Avenue (easterly boundary) will be completed upon ' development of Pi`rcel 1,, III ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: , The applicant completed Part, I of the Initial Sttu'y. SUIT con uct'ad a `field investigation and comps eted Part Ii of the Initial,` Study i(o adverser-:' pacts upon the environment are anticipated,as a result of this pro34 Therefore, issuance of Negative Oeclaration.ls apppopri`ate- ra TV CORRESPONDENCE..,,Not, of Publ is Hearingg have been sent to,surre" Ing property owners and placed in'the inland��Val ley.Daily,,Bulletin. Posting at the site`has also heen-completed. r>V. RECOMMENDATION: It Is.recommended that the Planning Commission consider, a -..input and�elemerits of the Tentative Parcel Wp 13919. Ig after suchconsideraticn, the-Commission can recommend appr&val,,.then the adopt6ri ,"af the attached Resol S4tion +'nd.issuance:of a Negative Declaration -woul d be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer Attachments: Exhibit "An-- Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Map Resolu2`ion and Recoinmerded Conditions of Approval x `} J: J; , ° SUMMIT AVE .<E Lu ? Q w '; p ch �; W a ITE z w a > 00 o � a PROPOSE 6 FOOCHlLL Fi3WY. 210 Frills'`!4 ANENU t AVENUE E t� ;` VYI N ROWS Z W 4 PAR Crry F �Al'CEL MAP l-919 RANCHO CUCAMONGA V l rl A/l rv- Al p fs�fl ENGnMMUNG D G " ter. .�r !VET Ar- rumm monai crct,�sv i ` N f7l , Tl � WA SUM CITY OF MI N e B /"ITW EL MAP 132 2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA - MTATI RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF;THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING 1 TENTATIVE'PAR(-FL MAP NUMBER 13919, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 'HIq"SAND AVENUE WEST OF ETIWANDA ,AVENUE AND ` MAKING FINDN6S IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 225-161-19, 32, 33, AND 34 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13919, submitted by The William Lyon Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 2 parcels, ,the real property situated in the City of Pancho Cucamonga, County -,iof San Bernardino, _State of California, identified as APN(s) '225-161-19, 32, '3 and 34, located on the north side of Highland Avenue, west of Etiwanda Avenue and WHEREAS, on July 10, 1991, the Plannil) 'Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for'the-above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, ''YHE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent,with the General-Plan. AML IV 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That try proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or ;public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been rev ewi ed FT considered in compliance with the California Environmental Duality Act of 1970; and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel-Map Number 13919 is hereby approved °ub3ect o��attael`ed Standard Conditions and the following Special "o��ditiotts: I` ` 1. All necessary- improvements on Parcel 2 shall be constructed upon 1 the development of Parcel- 1. 2. The dimensions of Parcel 2 shall be approved by Caltrans prior to final Map'approval. 3. The extent of improvements to Highland avenue will be determined upon the development of Parcel 1. SJ PLANNING COMMISSION REOLUTION NO THE AILLIAM LYON CO July 10, 1991 Page 2 4. The existing overhead utilities ,'(teleccmnunications and electrical) on the project side of Highland Avenue shall be r% undergrounded from the first pole off-site east of th,a, east I( project boundary to the first pole off-site west of the west f� project boundary. The developer may request a,;reimbursement j agreement to reOver ' one-half of she City adopted cost for } undergrounding from future redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite side of Highland Avenue. 5. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, 1 vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of� Det-irmination (NOD) regarding% the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of-,Supervisors of the County of San. Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filina fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code "Section 711.4, to9ether with any required handling charges, are ,paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. -The 'applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees ht)� been paid. lr' the event this application is determined exempt from such fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except 4 payment of any required handling charge for filing- a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall bs- deemed null and void. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS LOTH DAY OF 011'AY, 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: fl Tarry T. FIENIel, Chairman ti r ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I. Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning "Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby° certify that the foregoing Resolution was dul�r,-4nd regularly introduced, passed, and"adopted by the Planning Commission c.) the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the Oth day of July, 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMiISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: f ABSENT: ' COMMISSIONERS: OI{ T r L Q 1 •... A G O L C V. V.� V O i �j 'o c J c y✓ N e � IT O p p Y]] aL C ^La. L ��p aFi« oGy s :. cow po B� i G uC +ram jy+ 6L r= W~ ^ C S Ya 6 E L pO G LZ pE C la u (y G a U UCN 6YY•=..0. NVw GYO ..�i N.V N9a 4Y C Y S1 s` Z. y � « N _ Lt �q$Oy r � w �`\.N ' i � �p` �� • NN N;�- H N« z i _ CNo Y...Yyp <VM t CO V n y gg � I j Iy Y. OI O LL A y Y n yya. Nt Y 9'O d 0 u bu 9cu Ycv ZU OY ^ Tya` e � a � �� c c � = Y _G f AEel r: C W CAS '^O Oy L 0. `tea ^.,p gal >V�Y N� Y VON yt Ra 9 • y D O. 1YLr T A O Y D p-U Y C N G qy y N� 2 V 9 p a.YY G 4a Ci.Spt W.�. G aL LOI TS �O is p 011w tlq Y LW � Nu E�H a61 Y.� VO up Cv u� ai C:L ►. 94 u OY' r GO V^� YV a p $ iWy N S V d V N Y n ^ p� Y`.. L.. tY: VL p Y Y.. 28, ^ L YC `J VC�fROYii pa CGp Ou. wo S V •rf 72O.O.' O �Y V G� 4 dIJ y('�6� G �_G V C !� ley✓ Y -G ow pG v�Y ylA w� �� o it Oy �« � �•�. EyJ �O^ � �.O < Hv om C z+ Y� n29 t`j Y YV� 6V1 YV ^� 1}. u; pY uC pYu. tz Y4 2, _ D�Y gVE O�(pt.. u►93.. uL.VC � �Z ..SOW _:V�4`I(II tt N J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r STAFF REPORT DATE: July 10, 1991 v 7 TO: Chairman and Members of the`41anniniq Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14679 BANDAR INTERNATIONAL A residential subdivision and -D design review of a one-lot subdivision for condominium purposes for the development of 8 condominium units on 0.8'acres of land in the Medium Residential District(8-14 dwelling units per acre), located: west of Amethyst Avenue on the north side of ;19th Street APN: 201-474-04. Associated with this application is Tree Removdi Permit 90-17, I, :1 I. PROJECT AND SITE DZSCRIPTIO"" . A. Action F ested: Approval of the Subdivision Map, Site Plan, 0411din4`Elevations, Conceptual Grading and Landscape Plans, Tree Removal Permit and issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: Ten,�dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding`Land Lose and Zoning-. North Senior apartments; High Residential Distti.ict, (24-30 dwelling units per acre), Senior Sousing overlay District \< South - Existing single family residences; Low Residential D strict (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East Existing church facility; Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Existing single family residence; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: , .Project Site -Medium Residential North - High Residential South Low Residential East . - Medium.Residential West - Medium Residential �E �r. 'l ITEM Z PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14679 HANDAH INTERNATIONATi July 10, 1991' Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Total units: i� (all 3-bedroom) Parking required: 8 x 2 16 S x 0.25 = 2 Total parking spaces, required 18 Parking-provided: Enclosed garage 16 Open (standard size) ,4 Total parking spaces provided 20 F. Site Characteristive The site contains the Ariza House, which was determined to not h-tre any historic significance by the -_Historic Preservation Commission. Also, approximately lr, mature trees (9 of which are protected under ;*he Tree Preservation Ordinance) exist on; he property. The site slopes from north to south at roughly,O3 percent. II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop an 8 unit project with the potential for individually owned condominium. units. Becaui�e of this, a Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes is being processed in conjunction with the project. Two three Alex buildings and one two-plex building comprise the proposed 8 dwellings. Unit sizes range from 1,481 to - 1,735 square feet.,, All condominium units .are two-story and f incorporate enclosed 'two-car gauges on their lower level. In `> addition, four parallel "''vehicular parking spaces will be provided along the east property line.-_?-.The central common open space area includes, a spa, tot�iot, and overhead trellis with outdoor.shower facilities. The proposed development is in an area of Old Alta Loma where existing parcels have an irregular shape. In this specific case, the par._el is very deep and narrow. The site constraints limit the ways the project can be designed for development. During the initial review phase, staff required J the applicant�to provide a Master Plan for development of the parcels immediately west ,of the site (see. Exhibit "C") Although staff does not consider this 'Master Plan to be the optimum development,,situation, or ie conformance with the established design policies, it doe.: indicate that the AMIL development of Medium Residential density can occur on this parcel without impeding development of adjoining properties. `v PLANNING COF41SSXON STAF-F,` PORT TT 14679 - HANDAH INTEI c.,,►TIONAL July 10, 1991 \) Page 3 Since this time, staff.ktas received as application for an 18- unit-condominium development on the parcel immediately west of the property. B. Driveray Locations Due to the driveway .spacing requirements of Caltrans along 19th Street (which is a State Highway), direct access'to 19th Street across the parcel frontage is not } feasible. Given ,this limitation, it-was determined.that the next best access�ialternative would be Zo use the existing drive approach on the adjacent inland Area Fellowship Church property as the 'primary acc6ss "fors the' project. This driveway, in combination with the_, driveway shbwn> on the preliminary Site Plan for the parcel immediately west of the _ project, meets emergency access and spacing _,equirements of Caltrans and the City. C. Design Review Committee: The:project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on four separate occasions With the latest review occurring on May 16, 1991. At that time, the Committee (Tolstoy, Melcher, Coleman) recommended approval of the project subject ,,`, the following;, 1. -he stone columns adjacent to the maim driveway entrance should be Iac46asod in size to a minimum of 2 feet square. 2. A pedestrian connections-to the 19th S*seat sidewalk should be provided exclusive of the vehicul',Ar driveway. 3. The `wood trellis adjacent to the visitor parking spaces should be deleted. in exchanger the landscaping along the east property line should be upgraded to include trees that will, :shade cars and form a substantial property line buffer. 61 4 The cabana within, the common ogsn space area should be replaced with a wood trellis ` structure and outdoor shower. Also, a shade trsli s. with structurally substantial tables and benches should be provided in the common open space area. S. The proposed woad fencing between private yards should be replaced with stucco walls. 4 6. The private yard space- for Units 6 and 8 should be increased by placing iha stucco retu.n walls on the side of those units behind`'the side projection of the front doors. i I , .I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' TT 14679 - RANDAH INTERNATIONAL July 10, 19 1' Page 4 7. A wood trellis structure should be provided over the throat of the elongated entrances for Units 2 and `l Also, the applicant may wish to'provide a gate leading to the front door,of"these 'units. , S7 The following should be provided on the stucco/stone building..elevations: a. The stone wainscot 'should be upgraded'1 in thickness. ,Also, stone wrapped corners and.a 'cane belt course or cor_crete cap ehould be used` >Cead of the wood siding as .a transition between the stucco and stone: f c b. Additolial details consistent with the detailing used on the stucco elevations should be provi�a on ' zht balconies for stafg's review and approval. C. The wood trim on all corners and the belly,'band should be eliminated. d. A pop-c�'t element s ie i--aj',ibe provided`�on Plan A's side -elevation adjacent 'to and under the garage "eyebrow" Ir` 9. Eight-foot ,;nigh sliding glass doors should be utilized and the semicircular window abawe the doors raised on the rear elevations so that tk °-wood trellis patio covers will not conflict inieight with the semicircular windows. All of the above items, with the exception of 9(b) and 9 have been addrossedi the other items have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for the.project: " D. Technical Review Comnitteea on October 16, 19,90, the Committee reviewed the project and determined that together with the recownefided.--en+Gitions of Approval, the project is consistent with ale, applicable staAdards and ordinances. The Grading Committee conceptually approved the project at its meeting of March 20, 1991. E. Tree Removal: Iri ronjunetian with the Tentative Tract Map, the applicant has submitted' Tree Removal Permit No. 90-17 requesting the removal of four mature trees of�'7ario16 species on the property. Three of the four trees proposed-for removal are in poor health as identified by the arbo�ist- The other tree,:__ Pinus thunber iana (Japanese Black'`Pine)' is a health 'r g ! y i '.:tee lcated in an area that conflicts"with the construction W PLANNIN^G;;OMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14619- HANDAH INTERNP_TIONAL duly 10,.1991 Page 5 G of the southernmost,"uriit. The arborist recommended that r`ais tree could ' be r..oserved in p_ place or- moved, , transplanting, rr not a viable option; therefore, removal of U this tree is :teclassar,�I)y. However,' it should be noted that the applicant has made an effort to preserve five of the nine, mature trees on the property in designing the project,. Thti;efore, staff feels the removal of the four tree^ is war_inted as long as replacement planting is: provided per Oidinance No. 276. i,' F.' Environmental"Assessment: `Part I, of the Initial Study has been completed by-the applicant. Staff has completed Part Ir. the Environmental Caecklist, and found that there could be a' significant noise impa,;c on_resicuhges of,the project if the proposed Foothill 'Freeway is constr�ated in the future,' as well as noise impaction rated by' the current flow on 19tt, Street. :; An acoustical analysis `recommended that a minimum 5 1/2-foot high wall be built along the 19th, Street frontage to,,faitigate future noi:•e I problems.,. ' Staff has recommenced that the sound mitigation wall be c6n` tructed with the development of this tract, csasistent With the require-_ents of other -ievelopments in ;'this situ€+ticn. In addition, fear out of the, nine heritage trees on-site are proposed for removal, Therefore, staff has found that although the project could have a'significant effect en the environment, there will not�be F- significant ';affect in this case because of the mitigation 'measures 'included in the project design and Conditions of Apprcr al If the Commission concurs, then issuance of ,a! m.'.tigated Negative Declaration would be in order. Ill. FACTS FOR FrL.OINGS. Tha project is consistent with the Generel Plan and Development Code. The pro4Qct will;not be detrimental 'to the public health or safety or L use nuisance or significant adverse, environmental impacts. I.f`a?dbtion; the project's use, Sr,bafe�iion Map, and Conceptual Plans, together with the t;6r ditions of A_6pr ova l, a7a' in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE-, This item has been advertised p:=3 a public hearing in the tnlanei Valley Daily Brlletiu newspaper., the project has been posted and notices were>sent- to all :property owners within '_ 300_feet of the project site, as well as an expanded notification area. - V. RECOMMENDATION: . Staff recommends that the Planning Commission _ issue a mitigated Negative Decla;ration andf_approve the Subdivisi.in , ( Map, Design Review, and related Tre6 Rel:"Oal Permit No. 50-17, through adoption of the attached�iResolutions o_'Conditions. Approval with-, s : ' ;l n PLANNING COMKISSION'STAFF REPORT01, ' TT 14679 - tiANDAU INTERNATIONAL July 10, 1991 Pagp,� Res�pee 1y submitted, \~V City Planner 1i J BB:SH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site_Utilization Exhibit r7S",. Tentative Tract ap Exhibit "C Site,Plan Exhibit "D"' ..Conceptual .ulndscape Pl;'n' S '' Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading'Plan ' _ Exhibit' " Tree-Removal P-.I ,p 11 Exhibit "G"_- Building elevations - Exhibit "H" - Floor Plans Exhibit'"i"yr Roo£ Plans e Exhibit Architectura`1 Details Resolutio:'of Approval with Conditions for Tentative �( Tract 14679 Resolution t Apg=oral with Conditions for the Design ' Review of Tentative Tract 14679 I -7( (1 �t ri s a g T IC"b !w.T1Q 1 UtY�r tA'• r u iqL]j -_- '"•1�;'�!�'�'�ti"f`-,TIFI A ..,�T++,' L l� • "m'e.'T.� �r„eR _ - i • ! 1�� T i1.1 10 n, a y. '•a E1iE UZLBll71�dP0 54A� $�7k700�fl' 1 , � �., �.c�c v.•�. -s CITY OF R 'NCH0,C- dCAMONNGA, T ra4.- L&;479 PLANNING'D`"tMICN L is E: J 1'}'L E)MzBr .. ��` SCALE: i �t -7 t { �nh,fir - »was ern R.a w7 y. 1f sa+t.daaa.ar� n ci I IL is,Mur PA�p PER PLaN i PFR PER PLN/ =zysr• SECTIO91 A-A In B-B PITS_ NTS ITY OF RA-NCHO.CVCAMONGA PLANNING DrMION [EXHFSM' i[B'z SCALE: � Z n r k — .Y r `i z tixt ik r # txts �3 r g gg Al RL 4 Al _ I 00 LA 7-7 yti y F 1 �r �=,l+s SZs•+�gjii' _ 7�S�laj �I ,i� r7 .—i } Yk T 4 IV Wt- 4 VW a . �--�"/- f j a �� •,. �s� r.- 'r — 3;,, r'i� L —t �� c 'rS .R i,vim Jf t3 .. 01 rI r v�•, rria rwl a Tay. � r rsl i r o.r. ! �'� � t SECTION 11-8 SFCTTON AAA' �{ o '-' SECTION E-E NTS .20 _ ffi f4fQ f F - W T- e- SECTION C-C EARTHWORK QUAHTITMrS CUT::400C.Y..(RAW) C RLL.350C.Y.(FIA11O i » i ,EXPORT:SO C.Y.(RAW z FtZ1 SECITDN D-D � <` is LEGEND r 59�11q, ., PROPERTY UNE �L �a ..•-�< i `� - �� RETAINUlG.,riALL YARD DRAIN SYSTEM SWALE 1 Y°R dv _ A ly® waa>vuaam amww .� /Q ... �iYq Almli)t11 '�T"fJAa yK7 l: _ITY CIF RANCHt)-CL3Ctl�M[(3t�TCA gr.7q PLANNING DP,,-ISION 'Y rm C."'. rok�(rrie(irl�®- I. c MtBIT '�E y SCALE etc '�• „ o — r J 11 ``_-\ m - alp i� AN O LE619ND m o PRESERVE IN-PLACE ONLY CD TRANSPLANT POSSIBLE. A VYWT-440 P' D CITE OF 9AW61Hq-,C-Ue AMONGA - ]PLANNING- ION EXHIBIT: �r"SCALE: �f r� • �-� —_ Ili 1 i Ill .t, �.'� li•: l' G/' \1• tf-�? '' TYPE'A'REAR ELEVATION S:1%4'-1•—p gal.• ::ij�l�i. j•:,/\ 1 , !� ,t ! 1'j�r �1 `.� ,,.. a ����. TYPE*A`FRONT ELLE"TION S.1/4'=1'—W CIZ'Y OF ItANCI O�CUCAMONGA rrB4-_71' 1Hp79 PLANNING:UWISION EXHiEIT:C-_I v SCALE �'. AM ..t■ MK. 1 � an !.r■ -,,,�,, mtta .sr t. Kcal .0 • i't. fit.` � L• ..,. • 1 «ni • .. `4;. 11.:,, t i 1 r_� l I#�.IM�t �t11 1:4�#i � 4 i!�/�; 1'•s ii �t --- __:,z�u� lillillini�lilllllli�►�nar m�nIf rt, 10111l_.. iillll�����������i�lili Illlllui ;�Inllll 111 •= %'� m ■■ ..a 00 Ban NUN .r.. man ri.1 _ u■ O a _ T li 1yl_ N TYPE W)*GW ELEVATION 8:t/4'=t o- qp TYPE W SWE ELEVATIONS T' =1=0•, �% ZI7Y OFCUCAtyON TTEM: ?f IN67 ' SUNG DMSION n scAL Fes€err: -3 tiij "Ej, _ 1ttt1J �t ( { µ I TYPE-W S4�F'ELEVATION S:11/4`=1'-0' 2.1 /y{ wrr j• it7 TYPl3`W RM'IELEYAYS!?N 6 l/i=/'-0' s :i IY OF t`tANCRO-CUCAMONCA rims: " ANNTMG DWISION 'MITE: 13-;Id1:Y.`o EXHIBIT- SCALF- r I (9 i ' .. It ,� ,. _ _ •'. S diili i i s , ; / x jLL ..w.rsm.r. SYPB A`MU Ry a v y r u ::ITY OF RA C I -CUCAMONGA rm�l; AtQq PLANNING DI«ISIGN EXHIBrr. d'-f., SCAL -,-) r,. '9 f . ... r t (�lA'r�• ice.,. �� �� •+ylsrMwl�. i '�. t .� � M�q w'u"b Ylfi iAit61'• 'n1 � F M1 Z� l� Y M y MVN ♦�IhL f �� ^J dw i( FL.��i-• � "I'�i� �� ragl'F�� t. .� l , 7� - .... ��" ' �• - I�o��• nee �♦ TPP£'A' - SE60[v0 R®Od+P!.Ad;�:t/4�—T-R,� •'� _, ,., ' I i v y I'LANNING'D . ® -" EXHIBi1'� - SCALE:�� t S t � y ! - J i. all 1 - 31 7 L. ! '. ��� ��• •. ,,, � .try < i-? uw 0 ii f vpe'e'FmsT FLom PLAN S -1l i Q C�lli.a"lle!1t n1!'CA ' ,qlk nLA*rnNG'Irsrc� EXE? SCALE:---- , 2- Ot `� a i �` .cue av ") ..o-...-�....• F t pV' t t < 7YK,10. SECOND Fa OM PLAN 9:1/41_i=0' _ITC CAP P,.AN--"HO CUCAMONGA PLAIdIatIW�` DIWEcION TrrY.E: Pf e,s EIS SCALE: -: :r �y ki --� k" '� _ •i � E= w �t s -- ---- -- �—�N.11, , a oCIO r . rj n 0 w'. ,k B )) r l 16-x atiyl rl Wb TREUS DETAIL DETAIL OF WD FENCE FqXT.-LIGHTFIXTURE - r yyaa�� .F`nMwWw~ ;;J• o ror Vl t6Wr 1 Mrs NRN( ow"t.74 =ITY OF lU NCHO-r UCAMON CA IT tq679 `PI APdNING DIVNIOi'1E7S �,EXHIBIT. � SCAT E:' 5:;,, RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLF.NNTNG COMMISSI61:.,OF'THE CITY OF _ RANCHO CUCAMONGA,,,CAL..FtlRNIA, APPROVING TENTAT'CVE TRACT ' NO. 14679, A RESIDENTIAL', SUBDIVISION. FOR A „ONE-LOT SUBDIVISION FOR CONDOMINIUM PROPOSES, AND RELATED TREE- REMOVAL PZRKIT 'NO. 90-17, FOR 9i1E DEVELOPMENT OF CONDOMINIUM' UNITS ON' 0.8 ACRES r)F- -MbR IN Tia'E.JMEDYUM, RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14, DWELLT,LIG UNITS PER ACRE),: LOCATED WEST OF AMETHYST AVENUEII, +,/UN THE NORTH SIDE OF' 19TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDIN#,S IN SUPPORT THEREOF - ri II APN: 201-474-04. A. Recitals- (i) 1'landah"qnternational.has.,filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Tap No. 1d'09 an';described in the title of this 1Resolution.. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentati;2 Tract Map_ _equest is referred togas\"the appllcat3on:" l (ii , On the 10th day'of July 1991, the 9lannitig Comm;ssio. of the City of Rancho_Cucamonga conducted a duly':ioticed public hsiring,on the } pl3cat on and concluded said hear;` ig on that date.;-' r (ili) All legal prerequisitespr or to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. ); B. Resolution. {� NOW, 'THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, ana_resolved by the"':' Planning Commission of the Citl of Randho"�Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all o2 the facts, set forth In the Recitals, Part At of this Resolution are true and correct.. „E J 2. Based upon substantial"revidence presented to this Commission .," during the abnve-referenced public hearing on July 10; 1991, including e;ritten., and oral staff reports, togefiie'r with.p'ablic'testimony,,this Commission,herPDy sF _cifically finds as follows: (a) The appl.cation applies 'to ' property located wdat of i i �1 Amethysf; Street, on the north side of 19th Street,_with a street,1frortage of 110 feet and lot depth of 319 feet, and is,presently imprk%-9d with an existing siagle )family residence, curb, gutter, and nine "mature" trees of various ecies i and ti 5 �f (b) The , property to :the north of the,subject . site is an existing senior housing complex, the property .to. i;.ha south of the site consists of existing single .family residences, the;.property to the 'cast is an existing=,church, and the property to,--the .west incorporates a existing'singie _ family residence,; and .Ls PLANNING COMMISSION,RESOLUTION'NO. f+ TT 14679 - iANDAH INTERNATIONAL July 10, 1991 Page 2 (c) The Historic P_- seiiation Commission dete -tu.n_d the ;.the existing_house on the property was not historically 3ignificarit,,,at thtiir meetirg'!)f June 1, 1909, and a (d) The project contemplates the development of 8 condominium ) units, with an underlying Tenta,ive4Tract Map for condominium purposes, to _ allow the potential. for individual ownership 3. Based upon he substantial evidence presented to Gommisson during th@ above-referenced public hearing .and upon the specific fsndinQs .of facts mat.forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and L� conc?fides as fohlows: (a) The Tentative Tract is consistent'`with the. General Plan, and Development Code; and Ct (b) The design /or improvement 6'` of ,,the `Tents five Trac;h is consistent with the General P:,`an and DevropmLint Coda; and (c) The site is ,phyeic&1:-Jy suitable for the type of"development proposed; and 5 t (d) The design ,ot the' subdivision Lis' not likely to ,cause substantial environmeistal _dsrage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlifn Or their habitat; end } (e) The Tentative Tract, slot likely tor cause serious publ health problems; and' r` (f) The design of the Tentative Tract will.,s.;t conflict with any easement a6quir%3 by the public at large, now of L record, for access u through or use of the propert�)within the proposed subdivision.. I 4.r This Commission hereby finds ana certitfies that the ptoject has -_ been zevieaed and considered in compliance with the Califarnia'Environmental Quality Act -of 1970 and, further, this Coiwdssion hereby Issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. l4 5. Based,upon the findings and conclusions set forth:in oaragrapns _ 1, 2, 3, auo 4 above, _his Commission hereby the application subject to each and every cgndition set forth.Below and is the Standard Conditions attached hereto and iacorporared herein by this reference. ,r Planning Division 1) Pursuant to previsions' of California Public " Resources Code section 21JEJ%b), this, application hall npt bar operativp' 'vested, or- final, norf wilynuilding pe ants be issued or a �� 4 "`. map recoraed,?,un`al (1)' the Notice of Determination NOD' regarding the associated $ envir'cnmental action s'filed and posted with r iJ 4F PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, TT 14679 - HANDAR INTERNATIONAL July.10, 1991 'Page 3 the Clerk 'of the;'Hoard of Supervisors of the County of San-Hernardflor and J2) any end all required fling fees assessed' pursuant: to ii California 'Fish and :Gatle Code Section 7r�.1.4, S together with any rexu.lred handling,charges`; are paid to the County clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall pro ride' the Planning Department with' a stamped and conformed copy of the TT,,�tice of Determination _ together with a receipt showing that all fees (t have been.paid. In the event this application is determined exempt from such tiling fees pursuant Ito the provisions of the California Fish and ,Same Code,='or the guidelines prom'slgated`thereunder.,- except for pagment of any required handling , charge for filing, a Certificate of Fee I Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null_ ' and void. + P i 2) Tree Removal Permit 90-17 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions in accordant% with the Tree Preservation Ordinance- jya. a. Tree Nos. 11, `16, and 19 ay be removFd as ' required der the arbpristIs recommendations a2h Tree No:, 6 may be removed in ardez to develop, the project site as proposed. ' Af. 'of these trees shalt be, replaced one-for=one With the, largest nursery grown stock from the proposed plant palette.-, b. All trees proposed to remain in place , shall be protected by fencing around ` their'-perimeter drip lines. The fencing -'shall be installed to the satistoction of the City Planner:,prior to _he issuance of a rough gzading permit.. C. :All zeplac"cniexii trees shall be planted ,man o_.-site in usable, com !n r-pace rreaq to tie satisfactian .of, they City _ _riariner.J+ d. i'% Appro-WiL:bf Tree Removal permit No. 900'17 shall be valid fa- i period of 90 diys, ' �subject+to extenso i. 'The 90 days s ll ' hi t+tart c,-:frcmi tho date . of .fiaal map recordation:or: grading permits, whichever comes first. s . off. . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. j 2T 14679 HANDAH INTERNATIONAL is July 10, 1991 Page,4AMWA 2 r= _ngineerint Division: _ �✓�� .. 1) An an-lieu''fee, as contribution to the future- undergrounding of the--.', existing overhead utilities (ielecommunicati.oiis and electrid)' on the project side of 19th Street,,_shall•be_raid to the Pity prior to approval the C-nal map. , The fee shall be the full Cy ,adopted unit amount times the length oft,:the, project rrelntage. 2) Landscaping within the "area ,ci concern" shall, be in r)cccrdance.,with the intersection line-ar, sight design policy. Th:'._reit is necessary/,�to plant. street,trees on pr date propsety, a t�tee maintenance easement shall be provided.' 0 �I 'Building and S8P sty Division 1� 1) A Demolition. Permit for the existing residence shall be obtainedl'prior to the Issuance of grading permits.' 6 ;The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the ,:..option of this Resoltition. f:' _r APPROVED MID :ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY 1991. 1F' Pl ANNING COMMISS-ION OPT T,kk/CITY- W RANCHO''CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. Mgiel, hairman ATTEST: :3rad 5t11er, Secretary. I, Brad Bul3eri Secretary ct the Planning` Cnnmussion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, do' hereby c(frt_iiy that the foregoing Resolution was duly end_ l regularly,'introduced, pa��sed and adopted by the planning Commission u 'e City of Ratcho Cueamonga,J)at:a regular meeting i:ua Planning Gommiasion held on the 10tn day af ,July 194t:-by ttfe rolloing;aote-to-wit: AYES ,f COMMIS>IONERS- a� x f NOhs ;, C0MHISSI02ER5: r ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, TT 14679 - HANDAH' INTERNATIONAL � July 10, 1991 Page 4 3) Property Mai.itenance: Property owners are responsible for the continuous maintenance of 4; all buildings, structures, yards,' .landscaping, signs, parking areas, recreational facilities, and other, improvements in a manner whicti does not detraf^ from the appearance of the ;f surrounding areas. In add'�tion, Multiple Family Residential Developments subject to the I r Development/Design Review process' shall;- j�, } maintain site improvements in compliance with all applicarle Conditiono,of Approval imposed by the Plannins?Commission.' 4) Visitor Parking: visitcr.parking . shall be clearly. delineated-_..rough proper signage _b the satisfaction`of the'City, Planner. Signage may include, but is not limited to: individually lal41i.mg each parking •stall with the words "Visitor Parking" on the pavement surface, free-standing,; signs designating the stalls as visitor parking, and'di'ree�ory signs guiding visitors to th�;v44itor parking area. Ecaineering Divisions' L, 1) An in-lieu fee,, as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhaad ' utilities' (telecc=,'nications and electric) o" ,. the project side of 14th Street, shall be pail to the. City prior to approval of the f „l map. The fee shall be'the full City ;adoptjd unit amburt times the length of the project frontage. 2) Landscaping within the "area of concern" shall be in accordance with the 1 intersection line-of- sight design policy. Where 3t is necessary to plant street trees on private property, a'tree maintenance easement shall be provided. Building"and Safety Division 1) A Demoliticn Permit for' the existing residence \ shall be 'obtained prior to the issua;:e of \\ grading permits. JI PE-" The Secretary't-p this'Commiision shall certify to the adoption of this,;(esolution.� ��� WJO�q EP TMEN`� V Y O� _ OF a�,a�,®GmMcAltiiarkiisi? COMMUNITY MUNITY EVEL PM NT I " DA' D AN LXJ PROJEC #.: SUB ECTc w.rl G .wf�i��nra pry tc� :APPLICANT: N'Q„d-L LOCATION: N,^�L, S,�G uF IR* I,,,r f- u,4 _/4,,-44.vsF- Those items checked are Conditions of Aaprovai. ,APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, f;1► 4)989-le6l, FOR Ct.-APLf:+NCE r. WITH THE FOLLOWIRG CONDITIONS: _ A. TimeLiml:ri t. Approval shall exp4a.unless extended by the Planning Commission,if building permits are �—J- not issued orapproved use has not commenced within 24 months iramthe date ofapproval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to ► t. . I 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. Is granted subject to Wftti approval of �J 4. The deve,oper shall commerce,participate in,and consummate orci re to be commenced, participated in,or consummated,a Ms!Irs-boas Community Fadl"'b%trici(CFO)for the Rancho Cuca.*nonga Fire Protection District to finance construction a;W_or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. IT*station shall be located,designed,and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protections Distrit.and shah`bdca=the District's property upon cor,. Teflon. The ern%xnent shV be selected by the D;strict in accordance with its needs. In ai,y buildlM ;f a station,the dsvelopar stutil comp.?with all applicable laws and regulations.The CFr,ohs be fo.iridd by the District 8,nd the de.aloper by the tines reconi*m of tit$fist tnsp`0=rs: _ V/_ 5. Prior to recordation of the final map orfhe issuance of building permits,whid,avercomes first,the applica;t shRli consent to, or participate in,the esstabiishment of L Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and,maintenance of necessary school facilities. However,4 any school district has previouslyestablishW such a Community Facilities District,the applicant shall, in the al,'smathte,co 0M to tt a-annexation of.tie project site into the territory of such existing District pior to`the rw�'ordation of the final nap or issuance of building permits,whichever comes first.Further,lI the affected school district has not formed a Mello;Roos Communitffacilifies District within twelve months from the date of approval of the il ;,ject and prior to the recordation of the final map c r issuance Of Wilding peanits:,tr said;project,this condition shalt be deemed stub oax!void. �m - SC-2/91 1 of 12 ..�� SS3pi+leda,Dam• This conditionsha4 be waived•rf IWOty receives notice that the appiic-ant and all affected --Choolclistrictthave entered intu an agfeemenito privately accommodate any and all school j impacts as a result of this proiect. i _ 6. Priorto recordation of the final maporpriorto issuartcs or Oding permits when no map is involved,writtot•certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the prcposed project shalt be'submitted'to the Depilnment of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued'by the Ovate, district within 90d1yspriortofinal mapapproval inthe caseof subdivision or priorto issuance of permits in the cars of all'other residential projects. S. Site Development t.The site shalt-be developed and maintAned inaccordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architecturatelevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign pro�-ram,and grad:ng on file in the Planning Division,the conditions contained herein, r Development Code regal ns arxf Specific Plan and Planted Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project sits,,or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall tie completed to the satisfaction of?ho City Planner. _ 3. OccupaucyofthefacilityshallnotcommenceuntilsuchtimeasallUnifolmBuildingCodeand State Fire Marshall's regulations have been compiled with. Priorto occupancy,plans shalt I! be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdoa b occupancy. Aftk 4. ;revised site plans and building elevations Inmrporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/,_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. S:All site,grading,landrape,i rigation,arfdstreetinlptovementplansshallbecoordinatedfor J—J consistency prior to e.f�wypermits(sdch as grading,tree removal,encroachment, building,etm,or prior to fines map approval in the case of a custom tot subdivision,or approved use nas commenced,whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development _/_i_ Code,all other appl'rcatsle City Ordinances,and applicable Communlhi Plans or Specific Plans in affect at the time of Building Permit Issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shag be reviewed and approved by the City Planner-Nnd —/—J Sheritrs Department(989-6611)prior to the issuance of building pemrts. Such plan-shall indicate!style,illumination,location,height,and melhod of shiek9rog so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no ceM.ailzed trash receptacles are provided,all trash pick-up shall be for individual units, J—!_ with all receptacles shielded from public,view, 9. Trash reclpteele(s)am required and shall onset City standards. The final design,locations, ^J—1 and the rwmberot'ash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuan.'.e of building permits. Je _ �.:,rrgnwttd-mounted utility appurtenances such Cp transformers.AC condensers,eta,shall i�':_J— J be located out of public vlew and adequately screened'hough-the use of a combination of concrete or.masonry walls, bermirg,and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. SC-s/st is y:. 11.Street names Sh(i be submitted tor City Planner review arid approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the ftnal map. 12.All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concirse mariner, including proper illumination. (( r1 13.A detailed \plan indicating trail widths,maximum slopes,physical condi►bns,fllncing ^and weed control,in accordance with Citys'aster Trait drawings,shall., ;ubinitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street impmvement and grading p„?as.Developer shall upgrade and construct all traits,including fencing and drainpje devices,in conjunction with street improvements. 14.T.10 Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions(CC-Rs)shall not prohibit V;e keeping ofei�iine —]J— animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met.individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the opticaof keeping said animals wtthout he,necessity of appealing to.;boards of directors or homeowners'associations for amendme,unto the CC&Rs. 15.The Covenants,Conditions,and it lestrictk)ns(CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation ol'ihe Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of the Fianning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney.They shall to recorded concurrently with the 7mal Map os prior.to the Issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A recorded copy sh Ali be provided to the City Engineer. ✓ 16.All parkways,open areas,and landscaping sha�t>e permanently ma'Anainedby the property owner,homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintena.%ce shall be submitted for City Planner and:y Engtr iecr review and approval prior to issuance of Tsui ding pennitS. 17 Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that eaci lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive suniight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system.The easements may be contained In a Declarationzt Restrkiionsfor _ the subdivision which shall be recorded corwirrertly with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits,whichever comes firsi.The easements shall prohibt<ithe pasting of shadows by vegetation,structures,111012163 any other objm,except for utility wires and similar objects,pursuant to Development Cod®SWIon 17.08 060-C-2. 18.The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be&yeloped and _J maintained in accordance tAh the Historic t.argmsirk AkeratkA Perms No. .Any further r aditicatiorts 44'::� 'a,.�dudir>>g,ts4rttnot 11mitedto,exterior alterations and/or interior alterationswhichPf"lit9exteiidirofthebuiidingiorsta. ures,rerwvaloflandnark tress,demolition,reiecation,rxonstni'ction of buildings or structures,or changes to tl esite, shall require a mr 3lication to tlt$F'Yi rig,Landwark .aeration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C, 8ullding Daslgn �� 1 _4 i An atternewu energy system is required to provide domesti Xat water for all dwelling units ' and for heattng any swimming pool or spa,-Litiless other.iiiemative snergy systems are dernonstratedtobeotequivalentcapacrtg+and etlr�lency.Aliswimm'm ;+pis+frstaiied 3tthe tirrxi of initial.development shall be supplemented with solar h ating. Detain shalt be included in the rsuilding plants and shall be submitted for City Plattner rev;aw ann approval prior to the rssaance of building permits. i ,c it 2. All dwellings shall have tl.,Jront, f'she and rear elevafions'upgraded-*ith architectural treatt detailing tr r issuance o building surface treatment subject 1. City Planner �approval ptio permits. A t' SC-2/91 3 of 12 Z ftlpievon Dim, y, 3. Stawarr rlo cover plans tgruse,ry the Homeowvars'Association shall be submitted for City Pl pner and B.-Ming Otfiir;'fal review and approk�arpriorto issuance at buildingpermits. 1// 4. All roof api.ailenances,fnGuc`ng aircondfiorers annv��,ibf n-6unted equipinent and/or _/_/— qW isrojections,shallbe shielded tromview and the sound buttered i rem adjacent propeNiesan � streets as required by the Planning Division. Such,screening sh3il be arcbRecturaily integrated with the building design and constnictad to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. 0. Parking and vehicular Access(Indicate details on building plans) v/ 1. All parking rot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension, is feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall(including curb). 2. Textured peda,itfan pathways and textured pavement across circulation alsies shall be =/--r— provided throughoutthedeveiof t iitto connect dwstlirigs/units/lwildir)gswithW,rispacesl plazasirecreationai uses. v 3.All parking spaces'shalt be doubly striped per City standards aryd all driveway aisles, entrances,LM exits shall be striped per City.standards. tZ 4. All units shall be provided with garage door cpsners if drivewavc,are Mass than IS feet in depth from back of sidewalk _ / S. The Ociversants,CorAltions and nestrictions shall restrictthestorageofre�riatOc!vehicles J--�-- on thrs site unless they are the principal source of transportation toe the owner and prohibit pad<ing on interior circulation aisles ether hart in designated viaitor parking areas. ✓_6. Plans for any,security gates-shale be submitr3d for the City Planner, City Engineer,grid t} RaWtoCucarroi,ya;h'ireProtecWnaistftrevfewariammvaiprfortoissuanceofbuilding permits.E. landscaping(for pubii^ty mal;tal"3d landscape are rs,ret;:r to liic don N.), 1. A detailed iandsc ow and irrigation plan.imkKIing slope plrtntingandntodethome WWsrap dng in the case of residential,developmsm, s14H ae prapared fq=a Z4:enW landscape` architectandspbrridedforCityPlannert ,%,wdndapproval1xiQ totP,3issuanceotbuilding permits or prior tiny+.ip a!*mval'in the case of a custo( :subdiv t/ 2. Existing tmesreciuired't',3be preserved in place shall beprotscttttdwahaconstntctionbarrier _1._J inacxn-dancawith the MuutdclSai Code Section 49.08116,and o noted onthegradineplans. TheTocationofthoestrri. tob4pressrvedlnplacta and now locations for trdi'1spdanted"es shaft eshewnt,.:t t s ,,tadlandscapeplans.7heappOwitshalltcft-k-,allofMearborlst's", recommsndlat!ons r* -;-Jing preservation,transplanting ardidnxning tnethods. �3. Amhtfmumof ;trwwrgrossacre,cornprlsedonbefollowingsiz6a,shallbopm-?ided within the -inch box orlat ,_ 3&inchbaz;or _i Q_%� w box or arg r, VO 5-g%-i anon,an f_ %-5 gallon _ _8. A rrsirtirritrrn of __%of trees plarderdwithinthe projed Sha�l:;a spechiontlie trees _ 2A-inch box cr larger. .,. ✓ 5: Within packing kiis trees�Slall be;yMant3d at a rate of one 15-gallon trn tO every thrne �1� parking sta.,: sufficient to shade 500/6 of the paiki� area at solar noon on August 21. f SC,2/91 1offI2.� t` ono o L � , 91 C, AGE�,DA of � � campft s D.M:� 6. Trees.shaii be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of;ne tme per 30linear feet of building. �-1,-- 7. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of5,1orgreatersld J,but less than MW 2:1slope.shall be,at minimum,irrigatedandland.,caped with appropriate ground covertor erosion control: Slope planting required by this sectipp shall include a permanent,irrioation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. `'_8. All private slopes in excess of5feet:but less than 8 feet in vertical height andof2:lorgreater —/--� slope shallbe landscaped and inigatedforerr._,ioncontrol and ta;.:zoftentheir appearance as folk ws:one 15-gallon or argersize tree per each 150 sq.ft.of slope area,1-gallon or larger sizeshrub pereach 100 sq.ft.of slope area,and appropriate ground cover.in addition,slope banks in excess of a feet in vertical height and of2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tms per each 250 r'q,ft.of slope area.Trees and shrubs shall b9 t' planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane.Siope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development,all sic planting and irrigation shall be continu gusty maintained in a hearihy and thriving condiilo't.bythe devabperunill each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer.Priortoreleasini occupancy for those unfts,aninspection shalt be conducted++�Ati,e Planning Division to detemtine that they are In satisfactory corn:ition; V 10.For mufti-family residential ar d non-residential development,property owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-sde :,�.well as conliguous planted areas within tho public right-of-wey. All landscaped areas sibal£L* Rept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving oo6ditlGf"-4, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing,mowing, and trimming. AM damaned dead, diseased,or de::aying plant material shall be replaced Within 30 days from wage. 11.Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development 00'4)drift for .This requirement shall be in 3iit n to the required street trees and sk)p planting. 12.The final design+;of the perimeter parkways,walls,landscaping,and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subi9ct to City Planne'r1feview,and approval and coorclinatedforornsistency with arty parkway landscaping plan which maybe required by the Engineering Division. 13.Special landscape pec" features such as mounds alluvial neck,speclmen size trees,sti bander- --r--mounding, irg sidewalks wfth horizontal change),and intensified landscaping,Is required along 14p, %� -+ r/14.Landscaping and irrigation systems rewired to be installed within the public right-of-wey on tt,a perimeter of this pm]M area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. V/15.All eails shall beprovidedwithdecorativetrestment.If located in public maintenanc;aLleas, . the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division ( t i _ 16.Tree'On.aintenance criteria shall be developed and aubnriiited for City Planar review and .._/_J_ approve 1,;x o�to issua—of building permits. 7hes*r.riteda shall encourage the natural growth characterislics of the selected tree species. V.Landscaping Ptrd irrigation shall be designed to ponaerve enter through the principles of Xeriscapih as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SC'•2/91 !W 12 . Q=21.unn Dnte•V F.Signs,, 1. The'signsindicatedon the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any sigrs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval h•4he Planning Division priorto installation of any signs. 2.A Uniform Sign Pmgram for this development shall be submitted for City Planner r6lilervaMd J_!_ approval prior to issuance of building permits. _ J, I• V 3. Directory monument sign(s)shall be provided for apartment,condominium,or town f prlor to occupancy and shelf r,quire sa aarnte application and approval by the Pianh,;t . �., Division'prior to issuance of building pea nffi. G.Environmental 1 f 1. The t2veloper shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of Y 16 Fourth Street„ Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,liriorto accepting a cash deposit on any propet y: _2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted; Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fnylt, in a standard format as determined by the City yr Planner,Prior t0 accepting a Crlsh depisn on any properly. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Manner,prior to accepting a cash depusiYca any property: _ V 4. A final acoustical report shalt be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to P-e issuance of building permits.. The Yinal report shall discuss the lever of interior noise Afth attenuation to below 45CidEL,the twlklioj�'natedalsand consruction techniques provided, and if appropriate,verity the ader ,'icy of the mitigation measures.The building plans will be checkod for conformance with tf.j ru,igation measures conialned in the final report. H.Other Agencies _1/ 1. Ernergencysecondary access shhallbeproviob, Ina=rdarcqw3 h Rancho CucamongaFire —J—� Protection District Staedards. 2, Emergency access shall be provided,maintenance free and clear,a minimu nof26feetwide -1--� at all times during construction in uacordance with Rancho Ctccamonga Fire Pritaction District requiranxints. 3. Prior to israrance of building permits for oombustibW constni Lion. evidenc6 shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District:that water caapps y+or fire protection Is available,pending completion of required fire protection system:, r.; 4. The applicant shall coriuct the U.S.Postal Service to determfne the apprajariate type and location of mail boxes.Auld-family residential dsvelop;m rds shall provide a solid overhead structure for mall boxes with adequate lighting.The final melon of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead stricture shall be sxlbject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. S. For projects using septic tank facilities,writtsn certification of acceptability,including all -�--J suppor hre informatlort,shall bff obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Envica.arsental Wealth and submitted to the Building Oifloial prior to the issuance of Septic .: Tank Permits,and prior to issuance of buiidi:ig permits: sc-z/s t aorta 1 APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE 13UILDIPrG AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989.1863 FORI 1 COMPLIANCE WITH THE FrJV OWING CONDITIONS: Site Development ✓ 1. The applicant shall comglywith the latest adopted Uniform Building Code,Uniform Mechani- —J—J— cal Code,Uniform Plumbing Code,National Electric Code,and all other applicable codes, ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please conwet the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and,, applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new r9si1entla._-reiling uns(s)or rr<"Or addition --J— to existing unit(s),the applicant shall paydevelopmentfeesa 4hoestablishedrate.Suchtees may include,but are not limiiedto:City Beautification Fee,Park Fee,Drainage Fee,Systems Development Fee,Perms and Plan Checking Fees,and Sct:ooi Fees. 3. Prior 10 issuance of building permits.for a new commercial or Industrial development or _J_I addition to an existing development,the applicant shall pay development fees at the I established rate. Such fees may include,but are'not limited to:Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee,School Fees,Perms and Plan Checking Fees. 4. Streell addresses shall be provided bythe Bulldiry Official,aftertractfpamel map recordation _J-J—, aed prior to issuance of building Permits. J.Exlsting Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Buildlrg;,, :xs,.(or'the pnVerty line clearances —1---J_- considering use,area,and fire-resistivei;ess of existing buildings. r 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct_building and zoning regulations for —1—� the intended use or the building shag be demolkst-A, ✓ 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed,f€Red andlarcapped to comply with the Uniform Piumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-stle utile es are to be located and shown on buliOng pWs submitted for _/—J— building perils application. K.Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,City Grading Standards,and acted grading practices.The final grading plan shall be in substantial wrrformance.with the approved grading Plan. 2. A soils report s11all be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of CalNomia to J� perform such work. `- 3. The devel opment is located within the:,oil erosion txarsrol boundaries:a Soil DLsfurtiance J—.J— j Permit Is required.Pieasa contact San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture at(714) 387-2111 for peon it application.Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the Csy prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan heck. i '( 5. Thefinal grading plans shall becompletedandap rovedp4iortoiemanceofbeildingperras. SC-2/si 7Ofto - 6. Asa custom-lot subdivision,the following requirements shall be.me't. AOL a.Surety shall be posted and'anagreamentexe�,uted guaranteeing completion of all on-situ —J—J— drainage facilities necessary for eawatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Suiliing and Safety Division prlcrto final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. - b.4propriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto.—/—/— , or over adlacent parcels,are to be drlinealed and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to Issuance of grading and building pormits. c.On-site drainage Improvements,necessary forderwatering and protecting the subdivided —�—J— properties,are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be,subject to drainage flows entering, leaving,er within a parcel relative to which a buildiv� PennR is requested. d. Final grading plans for eacli parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issdance of twliding and grading permits.(This may be on an increrr�ntal or composite basis.) e.All Dope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical}sight shall be seeded with na:ive,nrasses or planted with ground cover for eresion control upon completion of grading or st*4 other alternative method of r.vsioncontrol shall to completed to thesatisfaction of the'Building Ofi,clal.in addition i Ormanent irrigation system shall be provided. This,requirement does riot release tht,appiicant/devebper from .oompiiance w ihe slope-panting requirements of Section 17.06;0401 of the Development Code. 1 f,+ APFLiCANT SHALL.CONTACT*rlE='ZWGINEERING DIVISION, q14)9E94Mt ,TAR COMPLIANT E WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L Defation and Vehicular Access 1.Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all Interior�ublic streets, J-1 community traits,public paseos,public landscape areas,street trees,and public drainage fWlities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. [fiats easements for non-public facilities(cross-lot drainage,local feeder trails,etc)shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative rrmp- 2. Dedication shall he made of 4.e follavnng',aigs-of wzy or%tha pa&mter streets —1^! (measured front!strw,-centerii,-Q); total feet or.-- l h girtef total feet on total feet on total c°aet an 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easernerdshaiibemade —1-1_ for all private streets or drives. v� 4. Non vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: 5. Re.Orocai actress easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CCBRs, —lJ— er by deeds and shaK be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building psrrnits,where rio map is involved. 3 SC-2/91 a Of 12 6. Private drainage easemenisforeross4 lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated co °i`uon o.w or noted on the final map.Auk 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction area on the / neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: ," TWe hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of(residential)buildings(or other structures)within those areas designated' on the map as building restriction areas.'",; A maintenance agreement shall also be g7anted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. v' 8. All oxisting easements lying within future 'rights-of-way shall be delineated _1 ng de sated o — the finaf!map. 1i n _yl� 9. Easements for;public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the pubW right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City wherevar they oncroach onto private property. 10.Additional street right-of-;way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes,to provide a minimum -_ of feet measured from the face of curbs.if curb,adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane,a parallel street tree malritenance ea-,ement shall be provided. 11.Ilia developershali make agoodfaifhefforttriacquire the required off=slte property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements,and if he/she should faC to do so, the developer shall,at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final r,tap for approval,enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant Ruck fi�fntnent Carle Section 66462 at such time astheCityaoquiresthspropedyimerestsr&quliddfortheimprovements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developerof all costs incurred by ttn`s City Aft to ac quiK,the off-site property interests rerµtired in connectionwith the subdivision.SHcurity for a portion,01 these casts shall be In the form of a cash deposit in the armunt givers in an appraisal report oNalned by the developer,at developer's cost.The appraiser.ahali have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M.Street Irnprovemenm3 _ . 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos, landscaped areas,etc.)shown orl the plans andfor tentative map shah be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include,but are not limited to,curb and gutter,AC pavement,drive approaches.Sidewaet<-s,street lights,ante street trees. 2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement,within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be _/ /_ constructed for all hah-section streets: 3. Construct the following perimeter street Improvements rocking,but not limited to: __J__J_ sTREer NAND"., CURB& A.C. SIDE DRIVE STREET STREET COMM.MED GurrER t'VMr WALK APPR UGH75 1REES MWL ISLAND O11iER : e el V' 1 91 SC-2 `J l 9 of 12 Z 7133 Notes: (a)Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)Pavement Cmpletlon Dam- reconstniWon and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c)If so marked,side walk shall be curvilinear per STD.304.,(d)if sp marked,an' -lieu of construction tee shall t o provided for this Rem. B) sir e ,, c�� e• _V 4. Improvement plans and construction: 11 a. ,,Street improvement plans including street trees and streetlights,prepared byaregis- tered Civil Engineer,shall be submitted tr:and approved by the City Engineer.Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improve- ments,priorto t';ial map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed ir,pub9c;right-of-way,fees shall be paid and a _J�1 construction permit shall be obtainedfrom the City EnIjineer's Office In addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping,marking,tratiic,street name signing,and interconnect conduit _J__J_ shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduft with pull boxes shallbeinestalleclon any newconstructionorreconstruction of major,secondary or collector streets which Intersect with other major,secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals.Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the rt street at 3 feet outside of BCRJ_CRoranyotheriocatlons approvedbythe City Engineer. Notes: (1)All pull boxes shall(oe No.6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-141ch galvanized steel with pulirope. e. Wheel chair rarnps shalt s4s installed or,i all four comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the Chy kiglneer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours duringcoratmction.A street closure permit may be required.Acash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion ct the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks.Under sidewak drains shall be _-C--- installed to City Standards,except for single fancily lots. h. Handicap access rarc;p design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. ___/__J_ I. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner priorto submittal for first plan cheek. 5.Street improvemord plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for _J review and approval by the City Englnser. Prior to arty work being performed on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits rewired. ✓ 6.Street trees,a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger,shall be installed per City Standards in -__/ accordance with the City's street tree program. Adk Z SC-2/9 t itD of l2 -7- 7.Intersection line of site designs.shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with Qi pleaon Dam, adopted policy. _/_J- Ask a. On collector or larger streets,lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, —J—J— including driveways.Walls„signs,and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landsc:41ng and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. i b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved,usually by moving the 2+l-closest street trees on each side away fromthe street and placed in a street tree easement. _V 8.A permit s hp by�e..77obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way —/� `TTr EL� ' 9.All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the --y—�— issuance of building permits: N.Public Maintenance Areas 1.A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards —J---�— shall Le submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.The following fandscape parkways, medians,paseos,easements, trails,or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: z- 2.A signed consent and waiver form to Join andiorforrn the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Dis tricts permits whichever occurs first.Formation costs shall be borne by the developer- 3.All required public landscaping and inigatlon systems;shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by th5 City. 4.Parkway landscaping an the following streat(s)shall cotfonn to the results of the respective J—/ Beautification Master Plan: o.nralnege and Flood Control 1. The project(or portions thereof)is located within a Ind Hazard Zone;therefore,flood —�--� protection measures shall be provided as certified by a re&Aered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2.It shall be the developer's responsibility to have itte current FIRM'Zone designation removed from the project area. The devoloper's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports,plans,and hydrologicthydraulic calculations. A Condiflonai Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR)shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A Letter of Map Revision(LOMR)shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance,whichever occurs first. 3.A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final -J I 110 map approv:n►;or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities she,;ca installed as required by the City Engineer. 37 sc-z/sr Z t1or12 Conmuleum Date 4..A permitfrom the County Flood Control.District is required for work within itsright-ol-way. 5.Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outc-ide diameter of any public storm drain r:f e measured from the cuter edge of a mature tree trunk. 6.Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a —�—� blockage in a sump catch basin on the publk:utreet. P.UJItties 1.Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanitary sewerage s tstem,water, r/_J gas,electric power,telephone,and cable Ted(all underground)in accordance w h the Utility Standards.Easements shay be provided as required. 2.The developer shall be responsible for the rotocation of existing utilities as necessary. ' _/-1_ 3.Water and sewer plans shall be designed and con0mcted to meet the requirements of the L-i Cucamonga County Water District(CCWD),.Raric;�Cucamonga Fire Protection District ., and the Environmental Heatth'Department of the'County,of San Bernardino,A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or lssuance of permits, r' whichever occurs first. Q.General Requirements and Approvals 1.Theseparateparcelscontainedwithin the project boundad&s shall be legally combined,tnto �--� one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2.An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,wh5chavet docurs first,for: Qr+ 3.Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the me— estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline,5ecorx"Regional,and tMaster Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final,map approval or prior to building permit issuance'rt no map is involved. S.Permits shall be obtained from the following agertcties for work within their right-of-way: 6.Asigned consent and waiverfoml to 1ein and/or form the Law Enforcement Community -J—/_ Facilities District shy be filer!with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the, issuance of boilaing pomsis,whichever o=ro first.Formation costs shall be borne try the Developer, 7.Prior to finalization of arty.davelopment phase,sufficient improvement plans shall be com- pleted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to, the satisfaction of the City Engineer.Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. SC-2/91 12 of 12 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING'CONXISSION OF THE CITY OF ` RANCHO CUCAMUNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING -Pf;E -DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 14679, ,-,A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND DESIGN REVIEW OF A ONE TAT SUBDIVISION FOR t CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT., OF 8 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 0.8 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED WEST OF AMETHYST AVENUE, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 201-474-04. A. Recitals. t, 1 W Har_dah International has filed an application for irhe Design Review of Tract No.,,14679 as' described in the -title of this 'Resolution.' - Her.3inafter, the 'subject Design Review regiest is referred to es "the application." "(ii) On the 10th day of July 1991, the P:I.anning Commission of the- City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meetiit4 to consider the applicatioA. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior 4,a`'the adoption of this Resolution) have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is"hereby;found,_'determined, and resolved by the Planniag Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga'as follows, 1. This Commission hereby specificall",finds that all ofQthe facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, cf"thi3 Resolutiion are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-references) meeting,on July 10--, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, this'Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plant and .. G) .i (b') That the proposed design is in accord with the nbj;actives . of the Development Code and the_purFrses of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development.Code-, and That the proposed design., together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or 11 welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, 0 Z�� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRTr 14679 - HANDAH INTERNATIONAL .July 10, 1391 Page 2 <, 1 i� 3. ease@;upon the findings and conclu6=10ns set forth(�in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the'Standard Conditions,`attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. �. Planning Division; 1) Additional details consistent with detailing used on the stucco elevations shall be , provided on all balconies for staff review and approval. 2) " Eight-foot high sliding glass doors shall be " "utilized and the semicircular window above the doors raised or, life rear elevations so that the wood trellis"` patio covers will -not conflict in height with the semicircular windows. 3) Trre Removal Permit No. 90-13 i h? eDy „ v approved subject to the following c` motions In accordance with the Tree i?reservation Ordinance. /!!/ a. Tree Nos. 11, 16, and 19 may, be re%9ved as required per the arborist°go; recommendations and Tree No. 6 may, be removed in, order to ieve'.top;the project site as proposed. All ie'of these trees r shall be replaced one � of with the largest nursery grown \r:ock from the proposed plant°'pal,ette. b. All trees proposed to rema3.n in place shall be protected by fencing around their perimeter drip lines. s The fencing shall be installed to the satisfaction. of the Planning Division prior to the issuance of a rough grading permit. c. All replacement trees shal be planted on-cite in usable, common open space areas to the Satisfaction of the City Planner. d. Approvai of Tree Removal Permit No. 90-17 1 shall be valid,,,for a period of 90 days, subject extension. The 90 days shall T start from the date of final map recordation or grading permits, whichever comes first. , PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIO�� O. DRTT 14679 - HANDAH INTERNATI0N July 10, 1991 i Page 3 i i' 4) The applicant shall coordinate with the church ' to construct the decorative block wall along the shared property line prior to accupar,ey of any units within the project. The wostlface of this portion of wall should be consistent in material and finish with `other perimeter walls for the project. Detailed plans and elevations of the walls: shall be revitUwed_and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building' permits. in addition, the applicant shall contact adjoining property o %ers to coordinate the removal of the - Ss` existing chain link fence along- the east property line. 5) The desi7n, of the' 19th Street streetscape shall be reviewed end approved by the Planning and Engineering Divisions ; prior to the issuance of building permits.,;, 6) The required specimen `vize trees (24-inch box or„larger) shall be concentrated in common open space and primary entry areas, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 7) Property Maintenance: Properrty1; owners are responsible.for the continuou�« �ntenance of all buildings, structures, yards, lardecaping, signs, parking areas, recreational facilities, Rid other improvements in'a manner which 'does not detract from the appearance of the surrounding areas. In addition, Multiple Family Residential Developments subject to the uevelopm4nt/Design Review process shall m.,lntain`site improvements. in compliance with (f al`i applicable Conditions of Approval imposed by the Planning Commission. 8. Visitor Parkiicg: Visitor parking shall` be clearly delineated through proper, signage to the satisfaction,-of the City planner. Signage may include, but *is not limited to: 111 individually labeling each parking stall with the words "Visitor Parking" ca, the pavement , surface, free-ata ding a ns��designating the stalls as visitor p3 7.-:yq, and Q.zgctory signs guiding visitors to the visitor puking area. QS �i r1 PLANNING COMi+iISSION RESOLUTION NO`; DRTT 14679 - BANDAR INTERNATIONAL R July 10, 1991 Page 3 n /f ff 4) The ap�,.icant shall coordinate with the cbnrch to construct the`'decorative block wall'along, the shared property line ifor to ocplpancy of any units within the project The west face o£, this portion of wall should,ie consistent in material''and`finish with ,tither perimeter walls for the project.' Detailed plans and elevations of the walls shall be r6viewed and approved by the Planning,Uivisio,._,...-rior to the issuance of building permits. In addition, the applicant shall contact-adjoining property C owner's to -coordinate the removal of the existing chain link fence along the east property line. - 11 r 5) The design of`{,,the 19th Street streetscap6 shall be reviaweZ and approved by.the 'Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to the issuance of-building permits. t 6) The required speciman size trees t 4-inch,-box v or larger)' shall concentrated�An common open space and primaryL entry areas, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Engineering4 Division: 1) Al- applicable conditions from the Resolution fdr Tentativs Trrct 14679 shall apply. !r �1 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the aloption of /V this Resolution. r v` APPROVSD AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA /art BY: jr Lkrry T. McNiel, Chairman 1/ f; l ATSCESI P �� �>>• Brad Buller, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. DRTT 14679 -'HANDAH INTERNATIONAL July 10, 1991 (!� Page 4 y 6 I, Brad Bulle';�Secretary of the Planning Coaidtission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly, slid' regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regal.x meeting`of the Planning Coami.ssion held fJ on the 10th day of July 1991, by the followinq-,vote-to-wit: i, AYES: COMMISSIONERSc NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r , a I j i 1 DEPARTMENT OF AL IL E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT#: SUBJECT, APPLICANT: 6 - LOCATION: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714)988.1t361, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits ComRiggo[).v., Ask V/ 1. Approval shall expire,unless exianded by the Planning Commission,if building permits are not issued orapproved use has notaommericedwithh124 months from the date uf approval. 2. Development/Design Rsview shall be appiaved prior to r 3. Approval of ftKiw Is granted subject to the approval of _J_J- 7T 4. The developershall commence,pafz'ClpgtqIn,andconsurrynateorcause to be commenced, ___/---J_ participated in,or consummated,a Me'Jo-Roos Community Facilities District(CFD)for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Proteckn.District to finance construction andlor maintenance of a fire station to serve the development.The slatlon shall bd located,designed,and built to as specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire PrWectlon District,and shall bscorne the District's property upon completion. T.*m equipment shag be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any btjkWV of a station,the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations.The CFDshall be formed by the District and the developer rat by the time recorion of the final map occurs. S. Prior to recop.11%ion of the final map or the issuance of building permits,whichever comes first,the applicant shall consent.to, or participate in,the establishment of a Mello-Roos j Community Facilities District for the eonstnlctionand maintenama of necessary school facilities. However,F any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities DiStrlct,the applicant shag,,in the alternative,consent to`the annexation of the project site into the territory of such exlstin2 District prior to the recordation of the Final map or the issuance of building permits,whichever comes first.Further,d the affected scfwrrl district has not forted a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve monlhsirom the date of approval of the`projcx and prior to,the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project,this condition shag be deemed null and void. i SC-2/91 1oC12 1 P� 7 M-71 This condition sh,11 be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school disV icts have entered into an agieem nt to privately aoccommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Pricr to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when m map is involved,written.verification from the affected water district that adequate,sewer and water ' facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such Icaer must have been issued by the water ' diistrictwithin90 days prior tofinal mapapprovd{Inthe case ofsub uta!oetorpricrtoissuance of pemiltz snthe case of all other residential projects. B.Site Development 1,The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which _1 — include site glans, architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors, sign program, anti greying on file in the Planning Division,the conditions containeu'herein. Development Code`regulations,and ,Specific flan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business ach,n: being cartimeaced utereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner, 3. Occupancy of the facility shall riot commence until suclitimeasall 6niform Building Code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been compiled with.Pdortc,.occupancy,plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occups-,r y. 4. Revised site plans and Wilding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Piannar review and approval prior to Issuance of building permits. S.All site,grading,tandscape,irrigation,and'street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for -1-- consistency prior to issuance of any permits(such as grading,tree removal,encroachment, building,etc.).or prior to final map approval in the case of a,custorn lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. ✓ 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development j Code,ail other applicable City Ordinances,and applicable Community Plaris or Specific � Plans in effect at the time of Building Pemlit issuance. e 7. A detailed ort-site lighting plan shall be reviewed aW approved by the City Planner and Sheriff's Department(959-6611)prior to the Issuance M building perttilitS. Such plan shall indlCa a style,Illumination,location,height,and method of Ehlelding so as not to adversely 0W adjacent properties. ;) V1 S. If no centralized trashreceptacle£are provided,all trash pick-up shall be for individuatunits with a{t receptacles shielded from pt,,htic view 9. Trash reaeptacle(s)ate requited and shall meet City standards. The final design,'locations, --1---��- and the number at trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and a4roval prior to,issuance of building permits. 10.All gn-lund-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers,Ar.condensers,etc„shall be located out of public view and adequately scroened through the usa of,j combinatirin of concrete or masonry walla beirming, and/or landscaping to the.satisiaction of 5 s City Planner, Z C a y SC-2/91 2 of 12 i i Ir Comoleuon Dam:. 11.Street names shall be submitted for City Plannerteview and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.w-IL12.All building numbers and individual units shalt be Identified in'a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination 13.A detailed plan indicating trail widths,maximum slopes,physical conditions,fencing,and weed control,in,iocordance with City Nlaster Trail drawings,shall be submitted for City Planner review an,`i approval oriorto appniVal and recordationof the FinalTract Map and prior to approval ofstreeRimprovement and gradirri plans.Developer shall upgrade and construO all trails,including fencingand drainage dev;:es,in conjunction with street improvements. 14.The Covenants,Conditions and Restrlctions(CC&Rs)shall notprohibitthe keeping ofequine _l_J animalswhere zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met.Individual lot owners In subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animaiswit"utthenecessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners'associations for arri6i rients to the CC&Rs. _ 15.The Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions(CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _J—J Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the,;.ity Attorney.They shall be recorded concurrently wfth the Final Map or prior to the Issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A recorded(rzijy shall be provided to the City Engineer, _ / 16.All parkways,open areas,and landscaping shall be permanently maintained bythe property _J owner, homeowners'association,or other mean aw—optable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. _ 17.Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or .(r/_-' dwelling unit ahall have the right to receive,sunlight acrosss 1jacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system.The easements maybe contained'.,, --)ctarat1on of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded cor=nntlywits, ^,Ubn of the fin<N1 map or issuance of permits,whichever'comes firs,The ewerrr,_ -the casting of shadows by vegetation,structures;flAurus or arry other oPnb,;,,,_„ ;opt for utility wires and otb similar objects,pursuant to Development Code$en 17.06.0F -Cr2. 18.The project contains a designated Historical Landmark, The site shall be developed and —J-J maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark AHeratlon Permit No. . Any further moth x atior;sto the site including,but W Orri ted to,exterior alterations andlor interior afterationswhich affect the exteriorot the buibdingsorsttttcture::rernovaioflandmark tn--,„emolition,relocation,raccastntction of buiidirip or structures.or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Co Miission review and''appr0.,-I. C. Building Design 1. :n alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot wate^for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa,unloss other aftemativra energy systems are demonsfw ed'ol}eof equivalent capacity and offWncy.All swimming pools installed at the tirn-s C!initial ct&elopmont shall be supplemented whit Mar heating. Details shall be included In the Wl ",a plans ahr1 shall be s:bmitted for City Planner review and approval prior to th"imo-t:' building permits. 2. All dwell rKjs'small have the front, side and rear elevations;r'1graded with architectural treatmaM."detatr;.^,aid increased delineation of surface treat„ent subject to City Planner reviiew;nnd appro'vai priorto issuance of tuildiN pei'enits. SC-2/9t 3 of 12 f5 P,01w, 7 CUIY1DrLUOt1 Dili:. V 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners'Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official rev€ew and approval prior to issuance,of buiidin:)permits. . 4. All roof appurtenances,Including air conditioners and ether rooi mourtled equipme:if'nails projections,shall beshtekted from viewand the soundbuff eredfr3ma',jkentpropel iesand streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening stall be architecturally integrateri with the building design and Constructed to the satisfaction of the Clli-.Planner. Details shall be included in building plane. D. parking and Vehicular Access,(Indicate details on bullding,plans) � / t. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a mf;.ir' 4 Aside cimension a4 6 teet aixl shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking s? -,,&6ding curb). V_2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textureivlpavement across circulatiorr alsles shall be --�--� provided throughout the developmeid1o,connect dwetling ?uti'sts<buiidiogswithopenspaces/ plazaalrecreational uses. 3. Ail parking.spaces shall be.'double striped pe..City aisles, entrances,and exhs shallb6 striped per City standards., - -- V 4. All units shall be provin� di garage door openers If dnve�yays aia less than 18 feet in 1—!_ depth from back of sldr 5. The Covenants,CoR�c Restrictions shallrestriWhostorage61recreationai�,ehkfes ---i— �— on this site untesc� ,h'era.. ;principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on irneriorJrculation aisles other than In designated visitor parking`areas. V 6. Plans for any securuy gates shall be submitted for the Citti Planner, City Engineer,and -1-1 Rancho Cucamonga►t're Protection District review and apt mvalpdorto issuance of building permits. E. Landsmpinp(tsar publicly malnts!nad landscap arws,rofsr•to+sactlon N.) �V 1. A detailed landscape and urig,afion plan,lr%O� slope planditg and modal home fandscap- - irrt In the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architedandsubm6ltedforC�jPlannerfeviewandappmvalpriortotheiswanceotbuitding permits or prior fir l.ntapx.,poval in the case of a custom M subdivision. IZ 2. Existing frees requiredto be preserved In p ace shall be pmtectedw-ith a c onstntcYwn barrier in accordance with the Mtu*4e!Code Section 19.09.110,iud so noted anthegrsdingplans. The locationof those treestobe preserved inplace and new facatiohcyvrtranspiaraadtrees -shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans.lboapplicard.o;hilltoti xv all of ttfe artsorist's recommendations regarding preservation,transpiant€ng and tti Ong methods. 3. Aminirnumot y6'Irmpargress acre,comprised of the following sizes,shall be pmvided within the prulert: -48-inch box or larger, 10 %-36-inch box or larger, --1--%-24-inch box or larger,__$Q_ %-154allon,and_,-,_�-%-5 gallon. 4. r,minirrKum of of trees planted within the project shag be specimen size trees 24-inzh box or larger. S. Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate c4 one 15-gallon tree for every three _ --J parking stalls,sufficient to shade 50a/e of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC-218'l 4 of 12 J z -r t 6. Trees shall be planted in areas public view adjacent to and along structures at a;i`te of one �4mpicuon Dal.: / tree per 30 linear feet of building. V 7. All private slope banks5fee:orlessinverticalheightandof5:1orrmaterslope,butlessthan 2:1 slope,shall be,at minimum,Irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion con,MM. Slope plarting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation sytem 4o be installed by the devebpsrprarto occupancy. B. All private slopes In excess of5feet,but less than 8feet invertical height andof 2:1 orgreater —�---� slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control aid to soften their appearance as follows:ore 15-gailon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.ft.of slope area,I-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq.It.of slope area,andapprdpriate ground cover.in addition,slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical heightand of 2:1 orgr3ator slope shall aISQ include one 5-gzllon or larger size tree per each 250 sq.ft.of slope area.Trees and shrubs shall be pi&ded in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane.Slope planting requiredby this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be instated by developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residentiai development,all slope plantirrj arrd lnlgatio.j shall be continu- YJ_!_ ously maintained in a heaftiryand thriving condltion bytha cWvefoperunaii mh individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer.Prior to releasing occupancytminose untis,an Inspection shall be conducted by the Pianning'Divisierr to deterrrIn*,,,iat thd)ara in satisfactory condition. 10.For mufti-family residential and non-r(asidsntier aeyeiw^pntant,property owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of�.m,Yorn9scapetf areas on-site,as well as contiguous plarted areas within the public right-of vay. All lardsc d areas shaft be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition. and shall receive regular pruning,,fertilizing, rrrswing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced w lthin 30 days from the date of damage. 11.Front yaM landscaping shall be recvaired per the Develupprnenl l-68,acid Jar This requirement sha'b be in addition to the. squired street trees and slope planting. _t 12.The final design of the perimeter paiivays,walls,landscaping,and sidswaiks shall`be Jam_ inciudea in the required landscape p4ans ahsf shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated forconsistenry with any parkway tandscapittg plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. _ 13.Special landscape featukaS OWI as moundirin,alluvial mck.f,speciman size trees,meander- ing side walks llhheo dal change),and bunstfled fAndscaping,Is required along l des. u 14.Landscaping and Irrigation systems required to be Installedwithin the public fight-of-way on --J J—' the perimeter of INS project area shall be aoffll=usly maintained by the developer. _ 15.All galls shall be provide,,-4 with decorative trectment.if located In public maintenance areas, J� the design shall be coordic,.tled with IN Engineering Division. 16.Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for C:"y Planner reviewer and _:JJ approval prior to issuance of building permits. These crieda shall encourage the natural givMh characteristics of the selected tree genies. 1/ 17.Landscaping and irrigation shall be des ignsd to con. me water thrmgh the principles of a: Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muni iiipal Code. 2/91 5 of t2 F.Signs Q:Sft mDue. 1 - _ 1. The signs indicated on the submPled plans are conceptual only and not apart of thisapproval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shalt require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner reviewand 1 �. app.oval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s)shall belProvided for apartment,condominium,or towntwmes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notico of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard for-nat as detemuned by the City Planner,priorto accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective Dwyer written notice of the City Adopted —�---f Special Studies Zone for tha Red Hill Fault, in a standarcl format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash•e3,xsit on any property. el 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard forr-.at as determined by the City Planner,prior c Rocepting a cash deposit on any property-' V/4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the' _J_1_ issuance of building permits. r,e final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL,the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate,verily the adequacy of the mitigation measures.The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H.Other Agencies 1. Emergency secondary amss shall be pri;vided in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Standards. 2. Emergency access shall be provided.maintenance free and clear.a minimumof26feetwide —J——/— at all tines during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to issuance of building pemsts for csrr.Vastible constriction, evidence shall be _l_J_ submitted to the Rant ho Cucamonga Firs Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available,pending corripletion of required fire protecli©n system. 4. The api st:ali COMM the U.Si Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and iocation,.f rnsil boxes.Multi-farnily residential daveioprtwnis shall provide a solid overhead stnocture for mail boxes with adequate lighting.The final location of fire mail boxes and the design ter 1"w overhead stnicture shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the istviihce of building permits. 5. for projec is using septic tank facilities,written certification of acceptability ?rtcluding all supportive'infoimation,shall be obtained from time San Semardino County t )partment of ; Environmt Aal Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to tfVi issv ;.ice of Septic Tank PemA"s,and prior to issuance of building pemnds. sc 2/9 r e orE2 c-z" t prqgAl APPLICANTS SHAD CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: .Site Development = 1 The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code,L;'Worm Mechani- cal Cods,Uniform Plumbing Code,National Electric Code,and ail othe jplicable codes, ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative ,permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unft(s)or major addition �--J to existing unit(s),the applicant shall pay developmentfeesat the established rate.Such fees may include,but are not limited to City Beautnication Fee,Pasts Fee,Drainage Fee,Systems Development Fee,Permit and Plan Checking`Fees,and School Fees. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new conrneroial or industrial development o,^, J� addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include.but are not llnt°°ed to:Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee,School Fees,Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4.Streetaddresses shall belirovide,6by the Building Official,a9tertract/pareel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J.Existing Structures f. Provide compliance with the>Uniform Building Code"fur the property line clearances -I—/ cons`Iderfng use,area,and tire-resistiveness W.existing buildings. 2. Existing building s shall be made to comply witfs'crorect building and zoning regulations for —/ — the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shag�=removed,tilled an dforcapped to comply with the Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform BulOng Code. 4.Underground on-site utilities are to be bcitted and shown on building plans submitted building permit application. u K.Grading Ir 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in/doordance with the Uniform Building Code,City Grading Standards, and accepted gradVV practices.The final grading plan shall be in substantial contfonrnance with the appro( 4ed grading plat. t 1/2. A soils report shalt be prepared by qujAlltfled engineer licensees try the State of C',tfomia to —�- perform such wade 3. The development is locateid vdhinthgi}soil erosion control boundaries,a Soil Disturbance Permit Is required.Please contact San 0ema1`4141`10 County Departmenttof Agriculture at(714) 387-2111 for permit application.Docugpenfationof such permit shaft be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough gradlrq;'perrnif. Y i.;..... t 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at —��— the time of application for grading plan check. 5. The i1nal grading plans shall be complet6d and approved priorto issuanceoll building permits. J—l— S'-2/91 7012 Comaletlon Date: 6. As a custom-lot subdivision,the following requirements shall be met: a Surety shall be posted and an agreement extglted guaranteeing completion of all on-site J—/— drainage facilities necessary for dew Hering at parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Sat ety Division priorto final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits b.Appropriate easements for safe disposal,of drainage water that are conducted onto —/�— or over adjacent parcels,are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to Issuance of grading and building permits. c.On-site drainage improvement',;,necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided properties,are to be installed;ricr to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may subject to drainage flows entering, leaving,or within a parcel relative to which a building permit Is requested. } d.Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Uvision for approval priorto issuance of building and g�jding pentdts.(Ibis may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e.All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height sht jl he seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover foe erosion control upon corr.,:4_iionof grading or some other aft mativemethodoferosioncontrol sha!!tecampletedto the satisfaction ofthe Building OftUI.;In addition a pann"rd irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the appiicantldevebper from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.0401 of the Development Code, APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714)9+39.1W2,FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L.Dedication and Vehicular Aceeaa 1.Rights-of-xay and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all Interior public streets, --J community trails,public paseos,public landscape areas,street trees.and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans andfor tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities(cross-lot drainage,local feeder trails,eIQ shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.; 2. Dedication sha;i tie made of the following rights-of-ovary on_the perimeter streets —f (measured irf lm stttet Centerline): 1 _total feet on i total feet on „ Total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offetrof dedication fgr�s -toot wide roadway eaa ment shall bemade for a;i private streets or drives. 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: _l_J_ 14�h 4i-nc�.-t 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be prow�ad ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs _/_J_ or by deeds and shall be recorded oorcurrentty with Ltv map or prior to the Issuance of building permits,whe!e no map is involved. ,s!� SC-2/91 B of t OW EW 5. private drainage easements forcross-lot drainage shall be provided anrtshalt be.delineVed C, Dlcwm base or noted on the final map. J 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10.4001 minimum building restriction area on the neighboring tot adr:`+ps the zerodot I rie wail.and contain the following language, TWO hereby de,—,"a to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the >,i construction of(residential)buildings(or other structures)within those areas designated on the map a$building restriction areas,' A maintenance agreement shall atsok;e granted from eactt;btto the atliacent lot through the CC&A's. r ✓ 8. Ali existing easements tying within;future rights-ol-way shall bequitciaimedor delineatedon �l r F f,,J final map. / 9 Easements for public sidew aflcs and/or streettrees placed outside the public right-cf-way —J. I shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. { 10.Additional street right-ot-way shall be dedicated atangrighttum lanes,#o provide aminimum _J of 7 feet measured from the:ace of curbs,ff curb adjacent sidewart is used along the right turn lane,a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall In provided. J 11.The developer shall make a goodfafth effort to acquire the required off-sne property irterest"r) k necessary to amstruct this required public Improvements,and N ha(she should fait to do so, the developer shell,at least 120 days prforto submittal of The final map forappw1j,enter f into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sdctiort f 66462 atsuchtimeastheCOacquiresthepropertyinterest;requiredforttleirnrirovemettta. Such agreement shalt provide for payment by the developer of all costs Incurred by the City ! Aft to acquire the ot:-siteproperty interests required inconnection#khthe Subdivision.Security for a portion of these costs shall be In the form of a cash depo n in the amourd given in an appraisal report obtained by the develq^st,at d4v&k�ar's coSI.The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to comrrtencernent of the app-.aisal. M.Street Improvements t, All WAG i , � u mprovemerds(irterlor si!feets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos, L J IarAw-,.jd areas,etc.)swvn drtthe plan andforten+tative atop shall be %nsttucied to City Standards. Interior sireaf4mproverrmer4s shall Endure.W are not limited to,curb and gutter.AC pavement.drive Ggipeoa 63,Sidewaft,Westiig!its,arxi street tines.) 2. A minimurn of 26-foot wile pavetrtent,within a 40-foot wide dediad6d right-of-way shalt be constructed for all halt-seWon streets. if 3, Construct the following}Q"Mter Street Improvements C:c. ding,but not limited to, STREET NAM CURB a A.C. SIDE ORM '31RFMT snewr comm.MED OIlFlER PVW WMX APPR fdfl its TREE3' I4LEtL; ISLAND 01HER e. t/r SC.a/gt 9at12 � ; Notes (a)Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)Pavement e�°tena ogee reconstruction and overlays will be determined'during plan check. (c)if so marked,side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD.304. (d)If so marked,an in lieu at construction fee shall be provided for this item(el o i s Lt,,:i ot— v, ,;[� c,-_Ao „i ^L.+tae 0—d J0r_-C.K+1.+ 4_'_ 'SY o.r-. r wt ,riJ J tia/Q5' /`4 r,-1' j3Mti[t4n�f -�X'Gi.,,nl,.. a.r GPS r•.�-'`./+4 r,�i�"r u/i . _�_ \-. .. V1����� .� 4, Improvement plans and construction: a. street improvement plans including street trees and street lights;prepared by a regis tered Civil Engineer,shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improve- merits,pg)rtoiinal map-apprgat or the Issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. b. Prior to arty vrrk being performed to public right-of-way,fees shall be paid and..a. construction;permit shall be obtained from the City.Engineer's Office in additkln to any other pennits"required. c. Pavement siditng,marking,traffic,street name signing,and interconnect c ondutt shall be instalkA to the satisfaction of Via City Engineer. d. Signalcondultwith pull boxes shall be installedon any now constructivriorrecionstruction of major,secondary or collWorstreetsvrhich Intersect with otherrna)or,secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals.Pull boxes shelf be placed on both sloes of the street at3 feet outside ofSCR,ECRorarbrotherlocailons approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 0 (1)All pull boxes shall be No.6 unless otherwise specified by thwgRk Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pullrope:; a.. Wheel chair ramps shall be Installed on all four comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f f. Existing City roads mqurwng curtsiriuction shag remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during constwction.A street closure permit maybe required.Acash deposit shag be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon k*mpletion of the constnrction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shag not cross sidewalks.Under sidewalk drains shall be -J_1 installed to City Standards,except for single famgy lots. h. Handlup Lass ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. \J_! 'J.' S"et narrm6shall be approved by the City Plannerpriorto submlflta!�Jrfirst plan,heck. 5.Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shag be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being parfomted on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction pem*s shag be obtained from the City Engineers Off lee in addition to any other permits required. ✓ 6.Street trees,a m)niztum of 15-gallon sae or larger,shag be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 0 SC-2/91 10 of 12 7.Intersection line of site designs thall be reviewed by the City Engineer Cmplcaon Dam adopted policy.icy --J--J— ANIL a.. On collector or larger streets,lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, -/—J-- including driveways..Walls,signs,and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential.-Street intersections shall have their noticeability improved,usually by moving the 2+/-^losest street trees on each side sxayfromthe street and placed in a street tree easement. _8.A permit shall,be obtained lfrom CALTRANS for any wdl#:within the following right-of-way: 9.All public improvements on the following streets shall be opoiratlonally complete prior to the �--1 issuance of building permits; N.Public Maintenance Arens f i.A separate set of landscape and Irrigation plans per EnglniV;iig Public Works Standards shall be submitted to tho City Engineer for review and appVM'Mai prior to final map approval or issuance of building penniis,whicheverocccurs first.The following landscape parkways, medians,paseos,easements, trails,or other areas are required to be an.ezed into the Landscape Maintenance District: 2.A signed consent and waiver form to join and/orform the appropriate Landscape,and Lighting VIEW Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prfortofinal map approval or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first.Formation costs shall be bome by the developer. 3.All required public landscaping and Irrigationsystem3 slhalibeoont-imslymaintair 4bythe developer until accepted by the City. Il d.Parkway landscaping on the following street(s)shall conform to the results of the respective J� Beautification M ster Plan: r O.Drainage and Flood Control f. The project(or portions thereof)is located within a Flood Hazard Zone;therefore„flood protection measures shall be provided as ceftitled.by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2.It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer sh2il.preRare all necessary reports,plans,and hydrulogicthydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR)shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever ocxurs first.A Letter of Map Revision(LOMR)shall be issued by FEMA prior io occupancy or improvement;acceptance,'whichever occurs first. 3.A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final —/-l— 1 map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the C4 Engineer. ti.-2/91 11ar12 �� it I f Prow,Vo.tlt�H(�i�'` Dater �`; 4.A permit fMm the County Flood Control District is required for work within ftsright-of-way, Cnmdecon . 5.Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6.Public stocm�ain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P.Utilities -` 1.Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary s"Kage system,water, �J gas,electric power,telephone,and cable TV(all underground)in acodi jance with the Utility Standards.Easements shall be provided as required, 2.Tiia developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilftiea\as necessary. _J 3.Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meut the requirements of the -1-1 Cucamonga County Water District(CCWD),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino.A letter of compliance from the CO WO Is required prior to f inal map appr�tvai or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. j 1 _ 0.General Requirements and Approvals 1.The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to Issuance of building permits. 2.An eas-meat for a,joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or J-l_ issuanlce`of building permits,whichever occurs first,for/+�n� a cccsS '1 Jam' "!'l.,t. 3.Prior to approval—of ithe finaFinap a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of appor lorrnr,g the assessments under Assessment District arnong the newly created pamels. JQ, 4.EtiwarKWSan Sevains Area Regional f.!.nmapl&re,Secondary Regional,and Master Plan v/_J Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final 'approval or prior to bui3 ng-,:)erntft issuance if no map is involved. 5.Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their tight-of-way: _ S.A signed ownsent and wahrer forth to join andlor form the Law Enforcement Community _%1 Facilities District shag he filed with the City E-Vneer prior to final ntap approval or tin issuance of building pemtifs,whichever occurs first:Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 7.Prior to finalization of any development phase,sufficient improvement plans shalt be Comm- p%ted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary aecesgil ?drainage pmt6 ion to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.Phase boundaries shall correspond to tot limes shown on the approved tentative map. i fl SC-2/91 12 of 12 s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA_ STAFF REPORT DATE: July 10, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Plan nanr�Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner., irl BY: � Steve Hayes, Associate Plann!,;c SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AiID CONDITIONAL USE PBf141T 90-42 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS-7/-The development of -an 'integrated shopping center lv!Xuding 13 commercial buildings totaling 318,283 square%t anc,a service station/car wash building totaling 2-?64 square feet on 31.13 acres of land with Phase alopment consisting of 5 buildings totaling 267,960 square feet on approximately 22 acres in the Reg:oaal' Related Office/Commercial District of the 'Victoria Common ty Plan, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the future Day Creek Boulevard- APN: 229-021-10, 15, 19, and 28. i I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: i A. Action Requested: Approval of a Regional .'Related Shopping Center, Detailed Site Plan, Grading Plan, Building::Elevations, and issuance of a mitigated Negativa,Declaration. B. Surrounding Sand Use and zoning- North Vacant; Regional Related Office/Commercial South Devore Freeway Right-of-Way East - Vacant Southern California Edison Utility Corridor; 'Utility Corridor �✓ West -- Vacant Southern California Edison Utility Corridorp Utility Corridor C. General Plan Designations: Project Site -'Commercia } North Commercial South Special Boulevard and Heavy Industrial East Flood Control%Utility Corridor West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor ITEF,AA tl PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP' 90-42 -'HUGHES INVESTMENTS July10, 1991. Page 2 u If D. Parking Calculations: Neer of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Reouired Provided Service Station 2,300 3 plus,_,:- 3 7 2/service bay 23 Retail 312,460 1/220 1,420 1,4 6262 Fast Food Rest. 3,524f 1/75 47 o TOTAL 316,283 ' 1r470 1,492,. E. Site Characteristics: The site is void of any"structures and includes remnants "of a former grape vineyard. The site slopes approximately 3 percent from north to south. F. Apvlicable Regulations: Within the Regional Related}`Land Use category of the Victoria Community Pl .tip a Conditionft Use Permit Is required for all shopping centers. r� Sh ANALYSIS: i A. General: The applicant proposes the development, of a Home Depot home improvement cewter, a R-Mart deparro��lsCo t -j,`, and related shops adjacent to the major tenants and on ten free standing AOL building pads. At this time, only or',., pad, Building 4 (see qP Exhibit "F-311')has been submitted for D®E+ign Review aPprovali the remainder of the free-standing pads,buildings will be required to be 'reviewed separately through the City's Development Review process a##-`+,xch time as the pXcjects are submitted to the City. B. Parking. This project is required to provide 1,470 .parking spaces, which includes 3,523 square feet-',of fast food restaurant space. The proposed site plan meets the minimum parking requirements, with an overflow of 22 parking spaces, raising the total to `1,492 parking spaces- All the spaces shown on the current site plan have been designed as standard sired stalls, 9 feet wide by 19' feet deep, per the recent interim direction of the Planning Commission. C. Design Review Committee: Following a preliminary oral presentation by the develvper on April 4, 1991, the Design'Review Committee reviewed the project on two separate occasions,, with the latest review occurring on June 6, 1991 At that time, the Committee (Chitiea, Vallette, Buller) recommended approval of the project subject to the following: J 1. The identical patterned metal grill work proposed for the-_~ Home Depot Garden. Center should be utilized on the K-Mare Garden Center. 4 T J PLANNING COMMI$SION STW REPORT CUP 90-42', HUGHES nMt''TMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 3 2. The pilasters within the K--Mart Garden. Center screen fence I should be finished with a more substantial cap, possibly an gIement that resembles the cornice detail .on the..__, buildings. 3. The lone circular column_ oit the front of the shops .; Building "L" should be replaced %rich an identical 'square column already used on these buildings. I 4. Metal grill work should,be utilized wit I°the openings of all dome towers, above the tile roofed 'areas. The metal ; grill work should be similiar in design and color to1`the metal grill work proposed in other areas within the center. 5. Alternative decorative tie styles and finishes should be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. !,ggested options includr, a coarser, less glossy quarry tire or a the that is either mori?,+rZaditional or innovative 3n its style. 6. Twenty-four inch box, or larger, si?e trees should be used exclusi,,!,ely in the planter within the long row of 'parking stalls s3outh of the K-Mart Garden Center. 4 k� All of these items have been incorporated into the attached Resolution as Conditions of Approval. =_r D. Technical review \Committee- on June 5, 1991, thfs Committee reviewed the project and. determined that, together -with the recommended. Conditions of Approval, the project is ,consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. The Grading Comittee conceptually approved the project at its meetivg of. June 4, 1991. E. Environmental_Assessment: Part I of the Tnitial Study,-.has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Fart II, the Eavuonmental__Checklist, and found that although the project could hava''a s gnifirant ef_f-Oct on the environment in ;several areas, including traffic, hy&mology, and public services, there will not be a sgtificant effePzt, on the environment in this case because of the mitigation"met cures which have been included as Conditions of Approval within the attaohed;,,Resolution• Therefore, if, after .reviewing the proposed mitigation measures specified within the Resolution the Commission concurs with staffs findings, then issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. rift 111. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order f1-ir the Planning Ccmmission to approve the project, the frXlowing facts ' ar findings =ast bee nade: l PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT l-tP 90-42 —HUGHES INVESTMENTS a July 10, 1991' Page 4 A. The proposed ;use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development, Code, the Victoria;Community Plan, said the purposes of the district in which the sit -1s located. B. The proposed`use, � Together with the conditions applicable thereto, will :not lie letrimeital to the Zsiblic health, safety, or welfare or materl.ally injurious to properties oit improvements in the vicinity. C. The proposed use comalies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and.the Victoria Community Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Thir item has been advertised as a Public Hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper ,, the project has been y , posted, and notices were sent to.all property owners within '300 'feet of the project site. NN V. RF.COMWNDAT:tON: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approvu_Conditional Use Permit 90-42 for, the:Phase I construction of 5 `buildings and the conceptual master planning for a total of 13 buildings within the proposed. project': through adoption of the (� " .attached'Resolution of Approval with. Conditions and iseuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration" Respe, y su tte , f Bra le City' 1-a.ner l BB:SH:js Attachments.- Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Exhibit "B" - Site Plan >JExhibit "C° - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "Du Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E - Architectural Rendering i Exhibit "8 -Building EitvatSons i Exhibit.'"G" - Building Sections 1 Exhibit "H"-- Landscape/Hardscape Details 1. Exhibit "I" -"Architectural Details/Sections, Exhibit "J" - Site Sections ?� Exhibit "x" - Street Snriping Plan Resolition of Approvl for Conditional Use-Permit'90-42 with Conditions lift r" I( { f r. ,. cli 71 i A a „ } iJ t t t o erg , f� `��0 t � � �.R # t r.r..w.u.•'........... t 'IIl.J11L. � (.+I iR 5 V) e. ♦ a t T K 7 i * a; } `��,y cy, ,<r��'"•t' ���t�. ?#�}•i'H try y�,��'� r� I��` , — s ;+fM92�ES31I L — ELVD 1`1 til r a k 1 � CITY OF RANCHO-,:[UCAMONGA '' nEM CLIP l4b,4� PLANMMG'DI-VISIQN Ems* TT:`'`i3-I SCALE: C RESUME "WE AREA 1.265.640 Sf (29.%2 AC) S(W O'..rp aql YJUJI,f yiOPPMG XRxC[;S/NRw P4Rrn'43,193 Sr(I O.SAC) [EN"I-M0...63 5r(,13.0) w,Pe.a, y400�r pNPNe w. .PD.. Lei ggrw+G;rR PARM .tsNca 31' �. ®MllF nfA`13 4r) 1,13J..S SF(7E0. � > .�wFwP.c ,'W a. I11 '—Cit Mrt..OfCNPaW Pa a 1>M1. MNP O RiPP P+G�P+R94S D�.a.P,. U PHASM WP vN[uot[Nm a�.N..1.nWNc i.a Pa rA, I : C'I'I'Y or- - UCAMa�tGA nmvL. C o -w.2 PLANNING DIVISION 'v EJCHIBrn'�3-o%, SCALE � J AM 1 r s 1 1� Ie e o n a �.,. •Q tt�0 Os�' 1Q� ��6�� ,d� t {�VA O FYI SAV. s� wj .e .� t f PLANT PALETTE i �% J'J 1�BAN�n�f6a*m� • r _ wsp. porn . � p•UFpanv ar ry ` 0 t o ti e D k >� FOGO!I FASFYBIfruvfKJ i �l > 'psi CITY OF I`A'NCH9-CUCAMONGA evp 4o-Ha s PLANNING-DrWSION EXHIBIT:"C-O\' SCALE: - saeiinw iwxuna '"""" i' kil E 9 � ie ; ,r' 44 CITY OF RA-NCH6 CUCAMONGA MM: c v P v-Ya PLANNING'Dr TESION EXHIBI` ."D-•P•' SOLE: N� 1� � � i 11 � � f / � ` � (�• �'`'.,/�/l � '.1 ? e Z, X, Asa. • ���/,'�:7 �,/ `.. { ; CITY OF i1r6f6,-CLTCAMONGA i�:_cvp Rb-� ,a�ft I'LANNIZTG DIVISION 'ISIIE ,r R� Pta:,"CS�N� 1 N EXHlBrrfD---)\\scALE: p O a �.�,�e...""' ..C• Ci, 11gY'CREEK{PULEV,iRP - tx 1 PlY CREEK YW ILfV6RP b. I I ia1 l 1 �RW'f)PLl 60l fY171P -�•' u.'a/s �i 1jS • a AL -17 III ft I ZIIY OF RAAtLO CCA tiC NGA /Ct Lp qo-fit PLANNING DI.VLSIOA EXHIBrr-"o-3`•SCALE^ r 4L v ` a .f. N* 1 cn Lu W � r lk rat I y` F I • ..s:R, �Y{ r � i•�.f V$R�( •�' CCIC��t .,�'"'�- t'atr�WWd\\\ - , � � �:•'t -+1-stl--+spa � c � �r a _ x _ p j FT 'AAA U =C it II_I e fir+' �• �1 '� a �.� ° 0_� o i ° O _tt•31' • • Y .ram �u ■ LCIO �--- ' F .w s c q ,� 1��11 I1°teftlllh:�ii �l�� ► i?iii Q o 0 - -- Q 0 O p t • y j Ij .t ol ! t1 ILr U o 00 a l O �^ 6d, r` S �^Q TZ o 1� ', i i _ f ✓, p v l� 1� ... • �•!+•• _ �'.Ott• 1 + _ t � _ e a r, � ) ♦ 3 71!!, 7- Y- -a A .� �A 9�3 � - _L_ � � •i ..� -w Y r p fir' y r, - ♦ A ��.I ffF99w 63 Z 0� =j g •�• {• V � _ • 4 t un M g g p0 1 it i 5 i f f l` uj s f s a 1 Yf Z LL ' C3 CD ou e Q. r try l �O { e � o r 1 Ah 00 tK tK tx Uo 7L s 1 d z 0 ` , y _ ►- Ow 18> it a` -`rt cfb w a ti �I h% 1 e or 1g ©„ 00 ;a I � It I ` 4 _at ad _ c-11 �!1 Sal r. - - --� -- _ a t i 1 q AA r � d� Ra not ®a � ='� .. ■1 - dial► �■�, - owl �Rl ��et ®ENOW Now r�Y ■�I e�� all BSI;' sue■; "`"'"•� ;. ■s i'= l :S W ♦'I ��1 , lair rare out ;ONE =moor NMI t �' 1 1 zsa���- `J _ ri l U a u c spippiallZ r x INS IAML � � B9 " 0 ® f z o � ��0 �, � 5 Y,:. :...%� .K i t F � *��"} .t'+Y 1 �, ri>`�t _ n +{ `! + '�� �? YV� `ir�� _ � _ • ss f K: '�. .•� � . a,� s," ;.1� , X. a � it �� _ ,® zi r�'i� t i _ �^ � • < ''r _ _ r�:�� �.' Y' ' _ ♦♦ a `. }'' �� � ,� ; �_� �* , ..� �, __. NSF � �� ` 4�� ^' f:�;_'. 4,� I�'.� f�O•:. Fi ti_ 0 CO2: LU K R - U CA AIML "�. O sF� b+V `. '1 tl�'ve�L1AWb IPM W r DIV> i F�.+4klJ13 t�RWN , w AM --�� fi.wm MESA R ' - 3• TICK _ o viw.�f L� MU"COCAMONGA "'Cup --moo PLA( �4/j DID,ION TITLE: EXHIBF a.f`F-B`"SCALE: 4 rL -AN V15W �b �.y LlwB 1(4 x ''� ► m - :ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA n--m;-✓p.Rn.q:z TrrLE �a Of Q, Fes; -Hrl Q P�'.i�'o P��•?�`PFUp�r M 'ce� :&titiT1'Efi :ITY OF iA-9 E G CL�CAMONGA 1TENie _u,� PLANNING-DIVISION 17Y'LE: stc ,�uc�r{scc`7i.•�i'cFr,��, - N EXHIBPf`A-u,, S&Ai jI 3 V }l The TimberFormO Renatawnue-f roily. eollard CycLoop+s`-1- - Bollard CycLoops are domed top 4-1 round, Scherlu:e 40 steel posts=with one,two or three integral Imps providing for the attachment of one bicycle r i000. i 'per 8o:ard can be s i orJared for Mo unting rem by direct a nbedmerr,or for surface applir ations.A removable mount is also available for ` seasonal use or special applications.CQ Lx and finish also"ons are the same as offered on original tycLoops. Bollard Cycloops heia'it abov Standard'mountng i by directs embedment unless otherwise noted fj.crLs areindi .led by suffixes used with tie mojal numtss'r.Cobr-coaurij •indicated by-C followed by the l' sm,,itfed oolor.pedestal(surface)mount is indicated by.P, 92 'nized finish Is indicated by-0,and V-i removable Velslon is indicated by-R. 6 { _ITY OF RANCH, O,-CUCAMONGA Imo: CUP PLANNING- DIVISION f 'ITtI E: .4 �-:. 4e�A�t 0 �,s , EXHIBIT""= 'SCALE: r �a oaes•oa•a o•assssoasm•m•sssswa's'� t ®` s • 0 • • O Om g • ��(( �I Q • , a • I . �saootih Bowl S a : �� • w�2••XM1 � - rTi lease ;aao®®`p••ooe••sees i • Dose••aso•aaaseeasaeassa+as•aes•maoeancooe vmraaaaaa_.es��--� �f� �'� r�w m •o Nall ismaim, osseacesssecueseoaawa•w• '••••�•••esesy`o•�ssmasepae� Double Rim �� m e — a 1mo.,Nm fiber- : I "a and h=,V • _ 02�.Y Q4•tY"X M•iD• a ,-. r<l �_ QL.'ga PLylie Sm,(as • �" .�� _ ,�.Q4-12'X 1t•11• i i a QZ•a6 44.73ti X M•72• c I 1 era evaifabie y eat _ #.1<•ta On-'7s14•X M 71• ; �`3 Sz .r ttli111 ° _ rti a�7D am•2 X M•1 11 :a F �df1 rG1BG e •2<•X Wowo i. =iw,.'••.1� i o �._: 003'+4a -31 X�Iti61�4' i • • ' �a4.3£"xMaSS� ^a e • a fYl ti916YNj{ m e�ue•eectesaows�4»oaasaeaaae�e»aooaaa�s.•ap••ym•m•saaa� ° �r"""`�'�'�"'� •f/ �BQ� `�absssoa•i�a•a.sea`9P.s�aCWptstTH8ma9maagaap '/ •,fir ~-� r �l �ITY OF I� 'I T�C7$€� [a�AlirrE�l)1�Gr� P'LAIIIITCs'D '16 : • CVfi�'�-Ufa•.,_,-'�- _� Ta 1, K Der Ls ti. f c'� .1 gg • it 44 I f ' _�i, �•��"�� � : "� � ;� is � �" -„� {� Ai g a c s 11�' ^000eC J .k V>LY JAp If IZ ell r, 1'V a a r r e I8 N �r ILI 44 r U a 7e, g 44a as rl 1 R � � � •. E a• r ��I �.'I • O i :3�i Z � �; 1 `fit i a� [ o oi=l ME 91 s i Q0 j k 0.6 , l ' 7 t `r _, 6 Agg�a 1 � I •1 MM ,;l S ! 11 WIN l 11 II ,1� (4 r � RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE,PT.41TNING COMt ISSION `OF THE'-CITVy OF ` RANCHO CUC. ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APFROVI2:v CONDITIONAL USE, PERMIT NO. 90-42 FOR THE DEM(Y'?MENT OF; A9 INTEGWED. ` SHC;PING CENTER INCLUDING ` 13• COMMERGTAL' BJZLDING,S TOTALING 318,283 SQUAB- FEET AND A SER6'ICE STATIONjCAR `{ WASH BIIIL6I3IG TOTALING 2,300 SPUATWI FEET ON 3f.13 ACRES j OF LAND WITH PHASE I DL:V-ULOPMENT CONSISTING OF 5 BUILDINGS TOTALING 2671960;SQV?.RE FS'ET ON APPRO$IMATFS�y S �i 22` ACRES IN WHE IEGIONAL 'RELATED r: HL ,"-FICEjCOMRCIAL ^- DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA COMMLNITY PL1*4' LOCATED ON THE �1 i SOUTH SIDE`OF FOOTHILL BOULEV'yRD, W STD,,OF THE FUTURE DAY CRE� BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SPFPCRT THEREOF - APN: 229-0421-10, r5,, 99; any 28. _ A. Recitals. - (i) Hughes Investments has filed an application for tho--issuance the Conditional Use Permit No. ,.90;42 as ;described in tdii title of this Resolution. dereinaftcr in, this Resolution, the- subject Conditiona3 - use Permit request is referred to as "the appl!76ation." On the\ 10th day;,of July 1�,41, 'tlie Planning Coi3mis§ibn of the r�) City of Rancho Cucamonga conauctec a duly nAticed plblic hearing on the application and concluded,isaid Y wring ou that date. j (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption have occurred. of this Resolution , B- Resolution ;! NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and xesoZved',by the Planning Commission of the City of)Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 9. ':his Commission,,hereby,specifically�Siads':`that all of the facts set forth in. the Recitals,-'Port A, of,this Resolution are true and correct. 1. Based upon si,bEtantia'I evidence presented to this Commtssio�i during the above-reference! ivalic Searing on July 1,0, 1991, including'tvritten , and oral_,staff reports, togatlse_' with public .testi*'ny, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: ` „1 (a) The application applies' to ,property located on the south' side of Foothill Bouleva.."_�, west of the, future' Day Creek.Boulevard, with a Foothill Boulevard frontage of appror_lmately '1,000 feet anci'lot depth, of'2,255 feet and is prez.ently unimprovdt" L1 f/ , V ar, i PLANNING COMMISSION''RESOLUTION NO. ' CUP-90-42 --HUGHES I1=STMENT5, July 10, 1991 Page 2 a f (b) The property to the =4�h of tht) subject site is vccant,�- the proper�y to the south of the siteincorporates the existing Devote"Freeway rigSt of-way and the properties to the each and west 'are Southern Cal_fornia Edison Utility corridors; (c) The property is zoned "Regional Related Offsae/'Ziommerclal" by,the Victoria Community;Flan; and (d) The project development As proposed to be phased with the- constructior,' cf Buildings 4' and 11 through 14 occurring initially. All other buildings, whk*Sh are considered to be within[ the second phase.°of'development, will require specific review and approval through the Development, Review process in the future. 3. Based upon the,,substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findinast:of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission,-hereby finds and concludes as follows,: ti (a)' That the proposed use is in;accoru with the General 'Plan, the objecti7es of the Development Code,'and the Victoria Community Plan and the purposes Qf the district in which the site is located. (b) That, the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable, (:hereto , will not be detrimental to the public health,.safety.or welfare or mate'riairy injurious to properties or,improvements in tbg, vicinity , . That the proposed use couglies with each of the applicable provisions,.of the Development Code and VictcA&,;Community Flan. a _ 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project: has i been reviewed and considered'in compliance with the California ,Environmental Quality Act' of V-70 and, further= this Commission hereby issues aImitigated Negative Declaration. ;) 0 _'l S. Based upon,the findings and conclusions set forth in parte;rap5"s 1, 2, 3, and above, th:Ua Commission hereby approves the application SLIbjecf to each and every conditiar, set forth below and in the Sta:adard Conditions c3 attached hereto and incorporated herein by,thls,reference. Planning Division: C: .Pursuant. to;.,provlsian's• of California E�bLc %Resources Cede a^ection 21089Tb?. this applicaticri%shall Yibt bo operative, vested,'or final;" iwr will bAzilA' ng permits be issued or a map re:orded, `ru.itil, tt 1) the Notice of "Determination .`(NOD), re`gardiirg tlje associated ,• r environaentx,l action As filed. and ,posted with the Clerk rn f th tr^,Board of Supervisors of the i t -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. �) CUP 90-42 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS r :;uly 10, "1991 ;. Page 3 Couaty of San Bernardino; and, (2) -any and all required iWlin' fees assessed pursuant to Cal,-f rni,a Fish ,_and Game Code,,Section 711 4, ' together `with any required handling chargs, are;paid to the County Clerk of the`Qounty of, c San 'Bernardino. The applicant shil sovide\-' a the Planning Department. with a' stampe,% and conformed. copy of the Notice of Determination together with a-receipt showing. that all fees have been paid. In tha evCat ;this application, is determined exempt from such filing fee-pursuant to the provisional from qch filing ;°ees pugs ant ,to the'provisions off',the-California Fish and Game Code, nr the guidelines promulgated there under,Jt except for pa}-went of :any, required handlin,,ll cha,-ge fcr filing a Certificate a: F�,. ' Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null art&:void. 'Metal grill work shall be utilized within the r.openings on all dome towers,, above the tile r droof areas. The metal grill work -shall be similar 'fin desigzi and color to the metal grill ` work, p?-oposed in other areas within the �conter, Details of theshall f of gri111 treatment- be reviewed- and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) Al_e,_-aative decorative title styles and 'finishes shall be 'reviewed and approved,by' the Designs Review Committee on a fonsent `Calendar basis, # prior =o,_tha issuance of,building permit,,. 4) Twenty-four inch box size, or larger, trees shall be Osed exclusively in the planter within the'long`row of parking,paces south of the K Mart Garden tter. r , 5) All ba loss lees of, towers shall be :treated f'l architect . ally equal, to the siltisf�actLon of '\�1 the City Planner.fanner. "r 6) Additional enriched pavement shall be p-rcvided across,vehicular'-drive aisles at kepjpedestrian crossiig locations subject -to e��.st„ew and i approval of the City;.Planner,:,prior'"to the issuance of building permii:s. l t 0� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. �! CUP 90-42 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, ?.991 1 0 Page 4 7) A 'reefstone wainscot vLth protective curbing t; I f' shall be utilized on all planters adjacent to building and pedestrian areas. \\` 8) r Additional 1 ndscape fingers ,rX tree wells ' s};all be provided to break up long rows of paring`stalls and°to provide. trees to shade �r\ the parking lot at a ratio of one tree periv three stalls•.- The locaiion of these fingers shall be subjectito review and approval by the Cit=n Planner prior to issuance of building permits. This requirement ,,nal not waive the. ' minimum numerical par_Zing z requirements for they) entire conceptually, approved project. 5) Berming, lov+�- ,walla, dense hedgerows of evergreen, shrubs, or a combination- thereof,, shall be ;provided to sufficiently ,screen all ` ;}parking areas from view of perimete sp ecial pecial boulevards, to the 'satin ietion of .the City Planner. The detailed '4.'Indscape/Iriigation`, plans shall indicate this rem•;;cement•' 10) Any landscaping within existing or future sewer easemento shall be required to comply with all requirements of the affected ar,Acies. ' Letters of authorization from these affected agencies,/;, shall be.r submitted to the Planning Divisio 7 prior to , approval of the detailea`l landscape/ir-igation plans, 11) The Devore Freeway Right-of-Way adjacent to the project :shall ba'landscaped in accordance with a master plan for the entire segment of the freeway within the City _as approved by Caltrans, the City Planner, and the City E.hgineer. However, if Caltrans will not allow the incremental construction of this freeway landscaping with this project, a cash: payment in-lieu of construction,' as a contribution to a future comprehensive project, shall be made to 41 the City prior to the issuance of builcing permits. The developer's responsibility shall be limited to the area welV- of the west edge of the first, travel lane 'across the project frontage. v / 12) , Additional cart' corral storage areas shall bec � provided; especially -in the center, and at the far ends of rows c� parking stalls adjacent to_ =` Home Depot,and K-Hart; _however.,,this=ghall not ' reduce required parking apaces. j t E. J p 1, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. CUP 90-42 y'�AUGnE$ INVESTMENTS July lot y�391 ,'i Page 5 /r' L All trash, enclosures shall be 7�3 utzy,in areas, ' concealed from view of main streets a�'�not l to bide key architectural elements on adl ent bindings or. .cause internal.if, ; i7rCvla,b conflicts. The �"exact location shall be ` J, reviewed ang approved by the City Pla;zner prior to tto issuance of building permits; j' 14) A*-`satellite dish shown on the conceptual plans is 'not apprz:Ved . -as' part of the, application it will kA stibjnct to a separate 1 Minor Development Review app�ication _prior to installation. %k^` 1.5) A separate Conditional,Use Permit ap]p�3cation shall be submitted, for review and appr 7a1 of `1 the proposed service station. 16) A sep `,to Developmentjb,n_ign Review 'off {� Conditional Use Permit shall Iis. submitted for !^ rsvi,ew and approval of any proposed building on L"future"pad parcels. Any future drive-thru uses shall comply with rahe polic,es contained within Planning Commission ,-;ZnsoUitior,. no. 89-96. 17) A Uniform Sign Program for the shopping c`,nter, including the major tenants for Butldib, K, HP P, shalt be, designed to be cor4bat" le w3,,th the architecturral style. Variatlbr bf sign color shall be minimal. The size o' ,the sign copy shall , ibex'- visually bal4nced f and proportionate to`I the building A,nd the architecture style. The Uniform Sign",Program shall be reviewed and approved by the Design—' - Review(.,4ommittee p;Aak,, to isruanco: of b-ollding ti permits. 18) Graffiti sh 11 A�'removed within 72 Hours r 19) A uniform, hardscape ,and street fyirniture treatment, including crash receptacles; frame- standing potted plants,, bike racks, light,,, bollards, benches, etc., shall be utilized for' rr theshopping,center ssd shall..bedesi-gned to be compatible with the archi�eatu�a`1 style. Q Detailed designs shall be s A1? ted ;,for,, Planning,Division review and approval, pric3• to issuanc/ of building permits. a> PLANNING COMML�SSCN VSSOLUTION No.,' r ,.} CUP s9-42 - HUGHES INVESTM£r_TS j July A, 1991 Page 6 31 fr' 26) The following trees sh913. be at least 136-incb- box size: a Tees framing tie primary Home Depot and a r� K-Mart entrances. = b) Entry accpss'treesj o Plata trees at.the intersection of Day fCrt�3k� and Foo,-hill Boulevard s-nd all plaza nodes. 21) Lot A (the 'near parcel east of Day.CreekCj Boulevard, n,,sr the south central portion of the - site) shall be landsca!7�ec to the satisfaction of the City Plann©r and City Engineer. 22) All, future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be included within the landscape aka irrigation plans which shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior,to issuance of building permits. Ask 23) A11 future,proj_3cts-w#1a,n the shopping center r-hall fie designed to be cdmpztible .and consisteiiti with the architectural program established, 24) Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into building faces and shall not extend out into the pedestri" wa1kw'ays. The;'design , details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. I 25) The entire site shall be kept free of-t-rash and debris at all times, and in no.event shall trash and debris ' remain for more; than _ twenty-four (24) hours. 26) The applicant sball resolve any Building Code compliance :difficulties (with construction of cr-i#)pies, property lines in relation to walls .-,,And other openings, and roof tile installation to withstand savere winds) with the Building & safety D vision.,prior to issuance of building '? r permits. _ A '�� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-42 - HUGHES I`RIESTMENTS a c July 1'Si 13-91 Paje 7 _ -7) There shall be provisions for the 'foh�awinl design features -i the trash enclos:,=e to tie satisfaction of tia City Planner: 13 a) Architect-t' ally integrated into the c,desi,Vv�,of the shopping center. i5 n b) edestr Separate p p an access that does not require openi ing the main doors to - include self-closing pedestrian door. -r c) Large 'enough to accommodate two trash bins). r d) Roll-up doors i e) Trash bins with counter-weighted lids.' f) Architectural)y ,txeated oresYiaAd= shade trellis. v g) Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out oi�-enclosare and ^�= designed to be hidden from view: AR 28) Stacking of matex'lals' shall not exceed-'the height of the scree4,walls for the K Mart .and Home Deport Gardeu Centers. 29) ;Outdoor displays shall not be allowed in the t; 'pasaer_gerc pull-off ;areas in front of Home Depot or any other areas *It3zin toe cents: that blocks__ vehidular or pedestrian. F airsvlstnri�;�\ � S \ 30) There shall b� a provision-4 for a security ' t.trol of the;yhopping 'cen' r at lease three timas per evening, sever `da s P , per w ��g � e�' _ .- Y a ii , betwe en h n . t e hours of 1�xQ �.m. a 3` 0 5 l 6 0 a.m. by a licensed private-patro' . ` j) �` 31) A bus shelter an Day Creek Boul ;ard shall be installed with strew 1` improvciaents. �i cxal location shall be submitted for Cit-vf Ti�tsn r review and approval priar,.to issuano'z o£ anX L ( - "' building permits;for the center. 32,1 _-No --znancy shall be permitted-'for my user yr ti l 1 street 1-uprovement6 have been { 3as;celled-lc.. c satisfaction of the City. - i !l PLANNING COr.ML^92ON RESOLUTION Wc. � CV? 90-42 — HUc ^S INVESTMENTtz July 10, 1991 Page s = 33) If phasing is proposed, the phasing plan shall be ,reviewed and approved, by the 'Planning Commission prior to' the`'issuance of any building permits for the center. 34"t No reriaanent outdoor storage of'shopping.ear; -" shall be permitted,:,unless o`herwise..a pproved by the Planning Commissiomti t 35) Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a - rat` equal to Five (5 -,�-�, 2 ,.. ) peYcerri of the required =mot,: •, aixomobile parking stalls, up to a maximum, of E 100 y bfec le storage spaces. Seruriiy racks I! shall be provided for each storage apa;e and shall be located near again building a i n nces in highly visible areatr to minimize theft c.° d ? vandalism. An aisle 'o! other space shalt;,-ybe pr61=3ded for bicycles to enter and leave;`the { , 5; storage spaces with a minimum width 'of'five (5) feet to the.,front or rear of a standard six-foot bia cle 1 �y parked in the space. EnGineerina rlry- aion a 1) AM Provide necessary right ofy ;nd ca»stt�sct Foothill -Boulevard full, wi9:.h .Boni Rochester , Avenue do Route 15. Sidewal._;l'and parkway ;. landscaping shall be constructed along the south side of the-ctxeet glom the centerline of the Day Creek Ch&mel to the cenfixi�ae 'of ' Lhe zautheh California Edison G" don oa the l eas'w 46`' f Day Creek nc�ilevara-,Q may be deferred for the -remaining portion of the street +until, development of tho adjacent 4,propexf -.• The limits of the off-seta imnrtse Ats may be reduced if approved 5y- the 2) Provide necessary right-of-"wale; and construc, 1 Da ree�, Boulevard/Pion,Der Way full width _ frE1�.'Foothi'l Boulevard to Rochester Avenue. Side alk and, parkway landscaping r Y be dr;feired until development of the adjacent property for the portion west o€.=, .the centerline of Day Crei�' Channe- 3) The develtper shall be elig?,61e for fee credit gainst and reimbursearent from f_ansportAtion M-velnpment Fees for the portion of the Pprovement on Foothill F Boulevard and Day,.t* eek Boulevard/Vioneer•, Vay r 4 07Q Q2 DULY : O, 1991 �g C, AGE��D� � � � o�, PLANNING COMMIrSION RESOI6TION NO. CUP 90-42 ,- HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 page a 33) ' If phasing is proposed, the hasin p g planehall be reviewed r and `Ipproved by the Planning F+ ' Coti ission .r cior to the issuance of any building permits for the center.- J 34) No permanent outdoor storage of shopping,carte shall be permitted, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. Bicycle storage spaces-shall be provided at a rate equal to 5 ;percent of :the required automobile parking stalls, up to a maximum,of 100 bicycle storage spaces., Security racks shall' be proviiited for each„storage space and te,;shall be locai near main building entrances in highly visibl.a areas,to minimize theft and vandalism. : An aisle or other apace shall be provided for bicycles to enter and leave the- "I storage spaces with a minimum width of feet to the front or rear of a standard 6-foot bicycle parked in the space Engineering Division: 1)° Provide'neceseary right-of and construct Foothill Boulevard full 'wiO.�,b. fror� .Rochester Avenue to Route IS. Si 0fol:,; and parkway, landscaping shall be consfi.5"gv.1teed along the south side of the street frezO the essnterline �f 'the Day Creek Channel to the`centerline of the Southern California Edison Corridor on the 4hat side of Day Creek Boulevard a.\_ may be deferred for the remaining portion of the o- street until development of the adjaacent ; property. The limits of the off�site improvements may be'''xeduced if approved TA the City Council. 2) Provide necessary right-of-way and construct'' Day Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Way full width from Foothill Boulevard` to Rochester Avenue. The median 'island shall extend the entire length of the street. Median openings shall be provided for all of the project driveways and am determined by the`City Eris*neer for the _ portion west-of ,Day C eek-Channel. The street curb-to-curb width shall be increased by 2 - -`Z-v t (from 64 to Zd-1 ast) to accommodate the1 median' within the BidnQir Way portion of the street- The median landscaping, sidewalk, and parkway landscaping m:ly be deferred until , Q! 14[�F2Ni41Zr �IIVLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-42—- HUGHES SNVESTIONTS r i,July 10', 1991 Page 9 � � �•� - s f development' at� the,adjacent property for the parCl.on west of the centerline of Day CIr"k, Channel. 3) The developer shall,be eligible for fee -q aga3npt and reimbursement from " ! Transj�ortat'ialn// Development fees for ihe" ; portion ofiftktha improvement on Foothill) i Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Flay tt detezmined by the City Engineer to be o`: t supplemental size aad length or,'Apacity ov}]c that needed for the impacts of tte`dovelopmei`�� ,,in_conformance with City policy, jin addition, the developer may request _a Reimbursement Agreem nt to recover the coat of, off-site street improvements tram future'deviiipment of A , a � the adja'.,ent property for non-'backbone imprbvemeriis. 4) Construct drainage facilities in conformance with he Victoria Lakes Area 'Drainage Impro.I.Fament'Implementation Policy" as follows: a) All'" facilities within Day Creeky`y Boulevard/Pioneer .Way from Day Creek" thannei`to north of 'foothill .SoulevardY J` •_s necessary, to serve aad protect the JJ ',,site; and I b) Reconstruct the existing channel - parallel-.to the freed'Jy, as necessary,' as Approved by the City Engineer. _S) Acquire easements and,_construct interim drainage facilities as determined necessary in the final drainage study to,protoct the site from flows from the north or as otherwisis 5 approved by he City Engineer. ( 6) Construct traffic signale at the interse�tiotsa of Foothili;Boulavard with Day Creek Beul#Ay.?sd 't ti and, Rochester Avenue with Pioneer.Way ta'_the satisfaction; of the City Engineer. The \\" developer •shall be eligible for fee credit against and reimbursement from the Transportatf�n Development Fees for conetructiod of the traffic signals ,)76yond' " .hole' needed to mitigate the £;pacts of thin development,, in conformance with.city policy, ri PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. , CUP 90-42 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS C July 10, 1991 Page 9 ` J� determined, by the City Engineer to be of suppleme_ncal site and length or capacity over that needed for the impacts of the development in conformance.with City policy. In addition, the developer may request ,a Reimbursement Agreement to recover the cost ,of off-site ^' street improvements from future development of r the adjacent property_..-,for' non-backlirne ; improvements. 4) Construct drainage facilitie3' in conformance with the, Victoria Lakes- Area 01Drainage Improvement Implementation Policy" as follows;; a)' All facilities within .,Day Creek Boulevard/Pioneer, Way ; from Day Creek Channel to north of Foothill Boulevard as necessary` to 'serve and protect the site: and b) Reconstruct th existing channel parallel to the ff ay, as necessary as approved by the',, Engineer. ,.. - 5) Acquire., easemenvs and construct interim drainage facilities as determined necessary in the final drainage rtudy-- to protect the, site from flows from the' north or as ;otherwise approved by the City Engineer. i 6) Construct traffic' signals at the ln`:ersections of,-'Foothill Boulevard with Day Creek Boulevard anti' Rochester Avenue with Pioneer Way''to the _ satisfaction of the Ciiy "Engineer. The I developer 'shall' be eligible for fee credit against and reimbursement from the 2ransp6rtation Development Fees for construction of the traffic signals beyond i; those needed to mitigate the impacts of this development, in conformance with City policy. 7) Construct a traffic signal at the projects main entrance on Day,Creek Boulevard to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the exiting ,.overhead utilities (electrical, except for 66KV electrical) 'on the `opposite side of Arrow E' Route shall be paid to the City prior to QW approval of final map or issuance of.building `t permits, whichever occurs first. ;The fee it ,yY PLANNING COMMT_SSION RESOLUTION NOY`.!I c ,' CUP 90-42 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 10 w 11 bel'one-half the City adopted unit amount times the,length from the ce"rI of the T-15 Freeway sight-of-way to the center of Day !+ -. -Creek Channe__,_ 9� .7 A temporary,easement for a Foothill"Boulevard , detour for the bay Creek project shall be ,provided to the., satisfaction or "thoz City En`ginear. Improvements within• }hi- easement t , c Snot be'constructed until the construction off Ithe bridge" on Foothill Boulep rd is comp!%te. 10,) Lsndscaping iithin the area for concern for all project driveways shall be approved by the City Engineer. 4a 11) ry.anstruct drainage facilities within, Pioneer �Zy as determined necessary by a ,, Final R;7ainage Study`approved by'the 6 �y ,Engineer c•,nsidering the area bounded by'�icneer Way, j, 21i hesi:�r Avenue,' Foothill Buule ,1rd, and Day !i` Creek Channel. 12) The maintenance of ",e parkway �n the east �J_ i side of DaY Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Way from the east aside of i;thei Edison Corridor to .00thill Boulevard including Lot "A" s'+all be the responsibility of the shopping "center. Lot "A" shall be included in Parcel 11,. 13) Approval from,,.SputLern California Edison shall be provided ,`for �3 ,construction of the service nrive4Nay within'-' theii easement, or .' prov,�de proof to`the' satisfaction of the 6if Engineer and City Attorney that the driveway can be legally constructed'.' 14) The service driveway on Foothill Boulevard shall be 35 feet in width as meas+fired a£ the right-of-way lins. o. The Sect-L_?ry to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, n . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. „ 7 CUP-90-42 -,H;GHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 11 1 l� { kr: APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH"bAY OF:JULY 1991, PLANNING COMMISSION OF 'PHE CITY OF .RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ; Larry T. McNielChairman ATTEST: _ Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the=City,of Rancho Cucamonga, do he regularly introduced,dhorny certify th& the foregoing Resolution was dul-"and, passed, and adopted 2iy the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of;;the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of July 1991, by -he'following vote-to-wit:,, AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ',>a NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1t l 141 t @QTV outDEPART ENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,.)T, AN 'A 0` 00" ITIN' PROJECT#: �aKe�t{(o�Ia, USG �c✓�,T �-yaI SUBJECT' 9��,42" C2 fer (b.S,MLr. A` 'y6t, Y . ---�� APPLICANT: �anbs hve3�r .�S c LOCATION: �S a-I Sic o F �*'1�Fh f�a-I zyr r ,lNt c�T rx I arcs!L c�I vot, Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (7.4)989.1861, FOR ,COMPLIANCE " WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits C=Rlctkn Due _1// 1. Approval shall expire,unYess extended by the Planning Commission,if building pemrfts are --�---� not issued orapproveduse has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Fjeviewv shall bo approv-4 prior to_.L --j_( 3. Approval of Tentative Mma No _� Is granted subject t0"the approval of 4. The developershallcommence,partkWe In,andoonsumrnateorcausetobecommenced, participated in,or consummated,a Melio-Roos Community Facilities Dislrk t(CFD)for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dist ildto finance oormtruction and/or mainenance of afire station to serve the development. The station shall be located,designed,and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and shall become the Distries property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. in any building of a station,the developer shay comply with all applicable lawns and regulations.The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. - S. Prior to recordation of the final map orthe issuance of building permits, whichevor.comes _./--J_ first,the applicant shag consent to, or participate In,the esteNishment of a Mejio-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However,if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District,the applicant shall, in the aftemative,consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of.'p final map or the issuance of building permits,whichever comes first.Further,if the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Comnxmity Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and pdorto the recordation of the final map or Issuance of building permits for said project,this condition shall be deemed null and void. Sc-2/9 r 1 of za ComRietim Dec This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have ertered into an agreementto privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior-D recordation of the final map orprior to issuance of building permits when no map is J_J_ involved,written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days priorto final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. S.Site Development 1.The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on Vile in the Planning Division,the conditions contained`herein, Development Code regulations,and -- - _ Specific Plan and is-�ria, Planned Community. _ 2. Prior to any/use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all onditions of Approval shall be compieted to the satisfaction of the City Planner. _/-3. Occupamyof thefacility shall notcommnce until such time as all UnlforM Building Code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been compiled with. Prlorto occupancy.plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Rva Protection District and the Building anti Safety Division to show compsance. The buikfing'shall be inspected for compliance prior to J occupancy. -c 4.Revised site plans and building elevations Incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to Issuance of building permits. -' t� S. All she,grading,landscapo,irrigation,and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for J l consistency priortoissuanceof any pem*s(such as grading,tree removal,encroachment, building,etc.),or prior to final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development J.J Code,all other applicable` itx Ordinances,and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Bul!ding Permit Issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and J_1 Sheriff's Department(989-6611)prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style,illumination,location,height,and method of shle:ding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. S. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided,all trash pick-up shall be for individual units J__J } with all receptacles shielded from public view. �/ 9. Trash receptacle(s)are required and shall meet.Cfty standards. The final design,locations, Jam— and the number of trash receptacles Shal!be subject to City Planner review and approval / prior to issuance of,buiiding permits. V 10.All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers,AC condensers,etc.,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of,a combination of conct:Is or masonry walls,berming,and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. sc-z�si ':! zorta Proikc�o:.CvP9�-K� Coda m Due 1 t.Street names-s stw'.1 be s�,pmitted for City planner review and approval in accordance with / the adapted.Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. ✓ 12.All building numbers and individual units shall be identified Ina clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13.A detailed plan indicating trail widths,;maximum slopes,physical conditions,fencing,:ind _J weed control,in accordance with City Master Trail drawings,shall be submitted for City Plannerreview and approvaiprbrtoapprovaiandreaordallonofthe FinalTract Map and prior to approval of street Improvement and grading plans.Developorshall ulogim&)and construct .. all trails,including fencing and drainage devices,In conNnetion with street improvements.' 14.The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions(CC&Rs)shall not prohibitthekeepirgof equine animalswherezoningrequirementsforthekoopingof said animals have been met.Individual lot owners in subdivisions shalt have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeovir ors'associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15.The Covenants.Conditions,and Restrictions(CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of then Planning and Engiieering Divisions and the City Attomey.They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map nr prior to the Issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.A recorded copy shall tie) provided to the City Engineer. 1.6.All parkways,spen areas,and landscaping shall be permanently maintained bytheprop sly r1_J owner, honr3owners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Pr9of(i this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Enginedr review and approval prior to issuance of building perrrtits. 17.Solar access easements shall be dediWed for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the fight to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or unfits for use of a solar energy system.The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits,whichever comes first.The easements shall prohkA file casting of shadows by vegetation,struclures,fixtures or any other object.except for utility wires and similar objects,pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G2. 18.The project contains a designated Histodoa)' Andmark. The site shalt be developed arvi maintained in accordance with the Historic UkIndmark Afterallon Permit No. Any further modifications to the site Including,but not raked to,exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exte►iorofthebuiloingsorstnictures,removal of landmark trees,demolition,reto:ahon,reoonstructionof humings orstructures,orchanges to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission,review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot tvater for ali dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa,un;ess other alternative energy systems are j demonstratedtobeof equivalent capacky and efiiclency.All swimming pools[Walled atthe time of Initial development shalt be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval 1 prior to the issuance of building permits. C L 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural --�--� treatment,detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Gilt'Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building peffnits. sc-c/st 3or12 S Ftyiect No.:GUF9v�i3- Comr1edon Dam 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners Association shalla;e submitted for J_J MMUM City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of twilling permits. 4. All roof appurtenances,incuding air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or ��_ projections,shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent proporties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening sh A be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Chy Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. ©. Parking and Vehicular Access(Indicate detalis on building plans) V/ _1. All parking lot Landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6feet and shall _1--J_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the,parking staff(including curb). ✓ 2. Tii.lured pedarstrianpathways,and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be ---/� provided throughout the development to connect dwellirrgs/units/buiidfngs with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. V 3. All parking spates shaffbe double striped per C ty standards and all driveway lades, I I� . entrances,and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall br�provided with garage door openers If drrreways are less •18 feet in depth from back of sidawafk ; 1 S. The Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions b�allf restrict the storage of recreational Vshicfes �— on this site unless the the Y are principal source of trdr-.spoRatlon for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in dssta. ed visitor parking areas. --,! 6: Plans for any security gates shall be subMIZted for the City Planner, City Engineer,and Rencho Cucamonga Fire Protection Disirictra'raw arid approval priorto issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping(for publicly maintained landscape arms,War to Section N.) ndscapsandirrigationplan,ineWng~ t. Adetarledta slope pl"and modaihome iartds�;ap- —/-/ Ing in the case of residential developrne;a;' she be p by a licensed landscapa arehitectandsubmdttedforCityPlarinerre�sndapp;mvalpriortotheissuanceofbuilding permits or prior final map appravfai lit the case of a custom lot subdivision. ..x 2. Existing trees requiredto be prmived In pike shag be protected wtih a construction barrier _/--I in acoordancewifhtt Municipal Coda Section 19.08.11ti.,wWsonotedonthe grading plans. The location of thoss trees to be preserved In&ce anii new locations fortrsnsplantedtrees shall be shown on the do Wed landscape p!ans,11*applicant shall follow all of the arberisrs recommendations'regar preservation,transplarriing Gid trimming methods. 3. Aminimrmot lraespergross acre,cr>t &ad ofthetollowing sizes,s-Va lbeprovided —J�v within the project: %-48-inch box orlarger, %-36-inch box orlarger. %-24-inch box or larger, % 15-gallon,and %-5 gallon. _ 4. A minimum of 0 %of trees planted wfthin the project shalt be specimen size trees- 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots,trees shalt be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls,sufficient to sheds 500,10 of the parking area at solnr noon on August 21: "C-2/91 Oaf 12 pv;��;ot=UP4o-yJ. 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacentto and alOr�,g structures ate,rate ofcne Comdetia,i Niel tree per,^;.tl linear feet of building, 7. Altprivateski inks 5 feet or Isis In vertical of 5,,t 6rgreaterslope.but less Nin _.t_J 2*1 slope,shall k ;at minimum,irrigated and land with appropriate gfound coverfor erosion control,'Slope planting squired by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. All private slopes in excess of6 feet,but less than 8feet in vertical height andof2,lorgreater _I_J slope shalt be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows:one 15-gallonor larger size tree per each 154sq,ft.of slope area,/-gallon or larger size shrub per 100 sq.R.of slope area,and appropriate ground cover.In addition,slope banks in excess of 8 feet In vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size Iraq per each 250 sq.ft.of sP pe area frees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften andvary slope plane.Slope plarding required by this section snail include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential devebpment;all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- ously maintainedinaheafthyandthrtvtngco; ttionby the developsruntil each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer.Priortoreleasingoccupancyforthoseunits,aninspection shall be conducted by the planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 10.For mufti-family residential and non-residential development,piopert, c�ir>srs are respon- _j _ sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-sfte,as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All I-mulscaped areas shall be,-:kepi free from weeds and debris and maIntainod in a healthy and thriving co/kIftion, and shall rgWve regular pruning,fen€liting, mowing,and trimming Any dam&`ped,dead,diseaa<id,or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damzVs. 11.Front yaid landscaping shalt be required per the Development Code and for This requirement shall';'e in addition to the required str,�t trees and slope planting. +f 12.The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls,landscapng,and sidewalks shall be included in ilia required landscape,fans and;shall I e subject to City Planner review and approval and000nftnatedforcortststencywfihanyparkvay tandwApitgplanwhichmaybe refirlred by the Engineering Masion: IZ 13.Special landscape features such as mounding,ail NzV rock,specimen size trees,meander- ina sidewalks ith horfzordal change),and Into flied landscaping,is required along �a c/ 14.LandscapIng and Irrigation system.required toAbe Installed withintheputt right-of-way an _J_J_ the perimeterof,this project area shatt be continuouolymaintained by the developer. i_ I S.All wails shall be providedwith decorative treatment.If located In public maintenance areas, ,Yi-r/,_, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. V/ 16.Tree maintenance criteria shall be devebped and submitted for City Planner review and _-_l___J__ approval priorto issuance of building fx:mhts. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree sperms ✓ 17.i.andscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _I.__i_AOL Xeriscape as defi-ed in Chapter 13.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cods. 53 sc 2/91 S of 12 F.Signs I. The signs Indicated on the Submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of thisapprovai. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign.Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prig=to Installation of any signs. ►� 2.A Uniform S;gn Progyarn forthis development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s)shall be provided for apartment,condominium,or townhomes —/ — prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G.Environmental 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer writtennotice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a stealard format as determined by the City Planner,priorto accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buSsr written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hilt Fauti,in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on,any property. I 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway _{_1 project In a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the JAY issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of Interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL-Ae building materials and construction techniques provided, and N appropriate,verify the adequacy of the miligation measures.The building plans will be checked for cortfommarace with time ntiti3ation measures contan�':�rf he final report. H.Other Agencies t Errmargencysecondarycccoss shall beprovidedinaccordantewithRanchoCucamongaFire —J—� "Protection District Standards. 2. Emergencyaccessshwnibeprovlded,maintenance free and clear,a minimum6f26feetwide at all times during corrtruction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to:issuance o! building permits for ccrnbusfibla construction, evidence shall be —/-J— submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire=roteclionDistrid that temporary water supply for fire protection is available,pending campletion of required lire protection system. — 4. The appiicant shall contact the U.S.Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes.MUNI-family res'sdantial developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting.The final tocatiohzf the mail boxes and the �J design of the overt ead stnrcture shall be subj.^ct to City Ptsnn� review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities,written certification of acceptability,including all —1 supportive information,shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank.,lermits,and prior to issuance of building rmi. sySC-2/91 6 of 12 l r� ''m Date. �! APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY D!VISION, (7114) 989-1663, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1.Site Development 1. The applicant shall complywitt the latest ad6pted Uniform Building Code,Uniform Mechani- cal Code,Uniform Plumbing Code,National.Electric Cd�:),and all other applicable codes, ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code A,;optlon Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Priorto issuance of building permits fora nowngsidontial dwelling unn(s)or major addition _!_J to existingunfl(s),the applicant shall pay developmentfees at the established rate,Suchfees may include,but are riot limited to:City Beautification Fee,Park Fee,dikMage Fee,Systems Development Fee,Pormk and Plan Checking Fees,and School Fees. 3.Prior to issuance of building permits for a n°ew commercial or Industrial development or _J—/,.__ addition to an existing develo ment."the applicant shall p p .pay develo memt fees at t~;. established rate.Such felts may include,but are not limited to:Systems Development Fee, Dratnage.'Fee,School Fees,Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4.Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official,aftertracVp=el map recordaWn _J__/ and prior to issuance of building permits. J.Existing Structums 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Buildtnr Code for the property line'clearances _J_J considering use,area,and fire-resistiveness of existing buikilrgs. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for —�-1— the intended use or the budding shall be dem+oitshod. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shattbe removed,filled an d/orcappad to compiywith the Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Unxt;rground on-sRe utilities are to be located and shown on buikting plans submitted for building permit application. K..r..-ing _ 1. Grading of the suNect property shall be In accordance wkh the Uniform Building Code,City -J--J Grading Standards,and accepted grading practIm&The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shalt be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to J— J perform such work: 3. The development Is located within the soil erasion control boundaries;a So9';DLsturbance _J—! Permit isreWlmd.Please contact San Bernardino County Depart�entofAgrici,tireat(714) 387-2111 for permit application..Documentation of such permitstat be submitted to the Cfty prior to the Issuance of roqjh grading permk. 4. A geological report shall bp,prepared by a quaillied enginearor geologist and submitted at —J—J tho time of application for-grading ran check. t/ 5. The final grading plans shall be ciKVeled and approved priorto Issuance of building permits. _I S-2/91 7 of 12 per=xe:-CV A;01'4P- 6. Asa custom-lot subs+vision,the following iequirerints shall be met: a.Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site --1--��-- drainage Inc.Ities necessary for dewatering ali parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety MvJionpriorto final map approval and priortoIY�issuanceof grading per n s. b.Appropriate easements for sate disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent pai8eis,are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to Issuance of grading:and building permits. c.Lan-site drainage improvements,necessaryfordowatering and protecting'he subdivided y--�— properties:are to be Installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving,or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requeVed. d.Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety, 1—J Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading hermits.(This may be on an Inctemental or composite basis.) e.All slope barks in excess of 5 feet In vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted withgroundcover forerosion control upon completianofgradingorsorwother akemativamethodoferosioncontmi shatibecorr4fttodtothesatisfactbnofthe Building Official.In addition a permanent ifrlgationsystem shall be provided. This"Irement does not release the appllca developer froal compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.0401 of the l3evelopment Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714)589.11i62,FOR COMPLIANCE TH THE FOLLOWING CONDITiONS: L<Dedi atton,and Vehicular Aces 1.Hlghts-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the Chy for all Irutarior pubic streets, community trails,public paseos,public lanciscape areas,streettrees,and public drainage facilities as shown on the puns aixilor tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities(doss-lot drainage,localfeedertrails,etc,)shall be reserved as shown on the plans aneVortentattve map. r ' 2. Dedication shall be made of the fo!iovvinp tights-of-way on the perimeter streets. (measured from street centerline): VAr+ total teat on lcl:kv 6J total fast on F� +1! �wd• total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer ofdeftmionfor--toot wide roadway easement shall I*ma,de for all private streets or drives. 4. Non-vehicular access shall bo dedicated to the City forthe following streets: _-_J_.__: 5. Reciprocal revess easements shall be provided ensu access to all parcels C &Rs ' p >'�? pa �I' C _.J�-- or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits,where to map is involved. SC-2/9 f a or to Cmpletion Date: �✓ 6. Privale drainage easements for cross-lot drairiage shall boprovided and shall be delineated �_ or not,.,on the final map. , 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10 foot minimum building restriction area on the _ __J neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line(►rail and Contain tho following language: "WVe hereby dedicate to the City of RanOm Cucamonga the right to prohibit the Construction of(residential)buildings(or`otherstructures)within those areas designa.ed on the map as building restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&Rs. 8. All existing easements lying Within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on —J the final map. 9. Easements for public sidaw j s arxvorstreet trees placed outside the public tight-of-way _J_1 shall be dedicated to the City wherever fty encroach onto private property. 310,Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along fight turn lanes,to provide a minimurif of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs,if curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane,a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall Us pfovided. V 11,The developershalimakea good faith effort toacquiretheraquiredoff-sitepropertyInterests _/,-J_. necessary to construct the required pubtio impmvemerits,and 9 he/she:should fall to do so, the developer shall,at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval,enter into an agreement complete the improvements pursuant to Govemment Code Section SM,2 at such time as the City acgUiresthe property interests required fortheImprovements. SA�tch agreement shall provide forpayment by the devetoperof all costs incurred by the City to acquire the oft-site property interests required inwrineCUonwiththe subdivision.Security for a portion of these costs shall be inthe farm of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer,at developer's cost.The appraiser shall have been approve)by the City prior to commencement of the a appraisal -" M.street improvernom 1. All public Improvements(Interior Lilreets,drainage fardlO?%com wri ty trails,paseos, landscaped areas,etc.)shown on ftplans w4fortentative map shall be constructed'to City Standards.interior street Improvements strap InckWe.b6i are not limited to,curb and gutter.AG pavement,drWo approaches,sklewalks,street fights.and street trees. 2 A minimum of 26-tootwide pavement;wkhin a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all hag-section streets. v' 3. Construct the following perimeter street Improvernirits including,but not Ur dted to: I SrREETNAME CURB& A.C. ,SIDE DRIVE SIRM 3TRECr COWL MWIM OMER GUTTER PVMT WAM APM HORM TREES TRAIL ISLAND r> i jt. ! old ✓ r< G l -T sc-2J91 9 0:12 _ pa+jm\o.CVr�b-J.Z Notes: (a)Median island includes landscaping and i rrigation on meter. (b)Pavement reconstruction and ov')clays will be determined during plan check. (c)If so marked,side- AIL x►aik shall be c;urvilinearperSTD.304. (d),if so�brked,an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4- improvement plans and construction: a. Street nrnvement plans including street trees and street light's,prepared by a regis- tered CK II Engineer,shall be submitted to and approved t y the City Engineer.Security shall be hosted and an agreement executed to the,satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City attorney guaranteeing con,plerlrn of the public andlor private street Improve- ments,prx)rto final map approval orthe issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. 1. (7 b. Prior to any work being performed in public tight-of-way,fees shall be paid and a Jr/_ consttuctie I permit stall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required: 4t c. Pavement striping,marking,traffic,street name signir'_�land ihterconti t con-kilt shall be installed to the satisfaction of he City Engineer. - d. Signal conduitwithpuliboxesshallbe installed onanynewconstruc;:onorreconstructlon of major,secondary or collector streets which Intersect with other_najor,secondary or, collector streets for future traffic signals.Pull boxes shall be placed an both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR,ECRoranyotherbcations approved by the City Engineer. t Notes: (1)All pull boxes sha!1 be No.6 uniess otherwise Specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-inch ga'vanizad steel with pulimpe., " JeJ e. Wheal chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of irte�sectfans per;Cify Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring cortstnxaion shall remain q 3n tti traffic at all times with —ice adequate detours during constnvUlon.A street closure permit maybe required.Acash deposit shall be provided to cover Me cost of Waft afsd paving, which shalt be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satista Ilion of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks.Undersidewascdrains shall be Jam_' installed to City GUndards,oxcept for single family Mats h. Haryylcap ewess ramp design shall be as specified bur the.C><y Engineer. I. Street names shall be&ppmved by the City Ptatarter pnorto sub mittit for first plan check. 5.Street improvement plans pe,City Standards for all private streets shaitF?provided for _!_J review and approval by the City Engirtaer.PrW to any work being performed on the pri- vate streets, fees shag.be pal and constWlon permits shall be obtained from the City, Engineers Office in r:6dition to ay other permits required 6.Street trcas,a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger,shall be installed per City St �,.ds in _!__ accorderve with the City's street tree program. SG :/91 10 of 12 7.Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the CityFngineer for conformance with adopted policy. a. On collector or larger streets,lines of sigh shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways.Walls,signs,and slopes shall be located,outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and rather obstructions within the lines of sight hall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential stliat intersections hall have their raticeabiiity Improved,usually by, --J,_/_ moving the 2+/-clos,',st street trees on each side a►ayfromthe street and placed in a street tree easement. 8.A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for ariy work within the following right-of-way: - Fo,sl 131vd- 9.All public Improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complatA prior to the issuance of building permits: N.Public Mintenance Areas \ ✓ 1.A separate set of landicape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards —J---/_ shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prtorto final map a,provat or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first.The following landscape medians are required to L.:annexed into the Landscape Maintenance Districts �Iprldd.r- WS l f aekym S Qjw<<A+ ''�+ -to",G"J'-!Ch'5 2.A signed consent and w/aiverform to join andforrfomrthe appropriate Landscape and Lighting Auk Districts shall be tiledwith the City Engineer pdorto final mapap Novmlor issuance of building permits whichever ours first.Formation costs shall ba borne bv:thc developer. 3.All required public landscaping and Irrigation systems shall be ,)uslyrnainta;nedhytho _J_/_ developer until accepted by the City. 4.Parkway landscaping on the following strest(s)strati cOnforM to tNbYesuits of the respective Beautification Mastsr Plan: F ti,I I 4tL'o1, a -I 9.Dm7nape and Mod Control 1. The'x',vlect(or portions thereof)is located within a Flood Hazard Zone;therefore,flood -�---� Protection measures shall be provided as Cortilied..by a registered Civil Engineer,and approved by the CRY Engineer. 2.It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone ' deaign-,fion rurnoved from the project area. The developer's engine r'srall prepare all necessary reports,plans,and hydrologl;lhydrauii Calculations. A Condflz.,nal Letter of Ma#,Revision(CLOMR)shall be obtained fiche FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance f Wlldinr p`1irmits,whichever occurs first.A Letter of Map Ravisio t(LOMR)shall be issued bV FEMA 'Mr,to occupancy orWiprovement acceptance,wlti;heveroc curs first. t` 3.A final drain;; ,r'-,,, Ze submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the°.ssuarlce of building permits,whichever occurs first Ali;frainage facilities shall ttl installed as required by the City Engineer. 5C-2/91 I l of 12 T I, �� r�i�tiocyPQb-y� r< ir 4.A pem,it from the County Flood Control District is required ferworlrwhhin ilsright of-way. 5.Tress are proh6fted within 5 feat of the outside diameter of any public stoma drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk ✓'~_6.Public storm drain easements shall be graded io cor:vey overtiows in the;vent of a - -1-J, blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P.Utilities t.Provide separate utility services to\each parcel Intuiting sanitary sewerage system,water, gas,electric power,telephone,and cable IV(all undergrtr:nd)in accordance with she Utility Standards.Easements shall be providfed as required. '2.The developer shalt be responsible for the relocstioi,orexisting utilitlevas necessary. f, r> 3.Water and sewer plans shalt be designed and constructed to mnet the requirements of the Jf Cucamonga County`,Hater District(COWD).Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. -arid the Environmeri3l Health Daparfinent of the County of San 8amardInO A lett�'of con"Aancefrom the C.CWC is OWIred prior to finat.map apppva arfssuarce of w nrits, Ahichever oocars first:;.' t;. 0.General Requirements and A.pprov =t.The separate parcals cor �In the project boundaries shall be ftdly combined dnto —J—� one parcel prior to Isst- A c,_ 'ding permits. 2.An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map ape<-oval or _1_1 issuance of building pert>ittts,whichever occurs first,for. 3.Prior to approval of the final! a da _sit shall be � pa pealed with the Gtiy covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among them"created parcrr'0s. 4.Etwanda/San 5evaine Area Regional PPainttn6;Seco g ndary Red-"af,and Master Pi&re Draln4e Fees shall be paid grit,t fin-al map approval or pier to building permit isviance If no map is involved. 5.permits shall to obtalned roam the fatiowing agencies for mric within their right-of-way: _J;J_ IQ n G w JMY, t A 6.A signed consent and%Averforns to joke and/or forth the Law Enforc�tru!it Community Facilities District shall be Ved with the City Engine?prior to final,nra f,approval or the issuarce of building permits.whichever occurs first.formation costs�1I be borate by the Developer. _ 7.Prior to finalitatn of any development phase,suffWent Improvement plans shah be eom- ___r`- ploled beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary aness and drainage proteciigs to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.Phase boundaries shall porrssp rd to lot linen shorn , on the appmved tentativa map. SC-2/5I' 12 of 12 r a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFY REPORT DATES July 10, 1991 TO: Chairman,and Members of the Planning Commission {' FROM: 6arrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY Barbara Krall, Associate Engineer i' suga is ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13808 - Hughes f Investments- - su i vi s on o acres a an into parcels �! ina Regional-`Related Office/Commercial District-,�bf the Victoria - = Community Plan located, on the south side of,Foothill Boulevard, west of'Future Day Creek Boulevard;--- APN: r.219-021-10, 15, 19, & 28. i/ I. PROJECT AND SITE flE,,c CRIFTION. A. Action Requested: Apr bva', of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shownon x y ,1Bu B. Parcel Size: Parcels range in-si'ze from 0.61 acres to 12.96 acres. IN C. Existing Zoning: Regional Related Office/Commercial District of the Victoria Community Plan 0, Surrounding Land Use: North - Vacant South - Route 15 Freeway Right-of-way East Vacant West Vacant E. Surrounding General Plan and Development C66: Designations: North - Regional Related`Office/Commercial t South - Special Boulevard and Heavy Industrial - STEM 8B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 2 East - Utility Corridor West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant except for an existing unattended vineyard. \II. ANALYSIS• The purpose of ,the Parcel Map is to create 16 parcels for the development of a shopping center,which 'is oar ton ght'sragenda as CUP 90-42. The conditions of approval require Day Ce"ek Boulevard and Pioneer Way to be constructedO full widtiCfrom Foothill Boulevard.to Rochester Avenue. Reciprocal access -rid ntenance agreements are to be provided by C.C. & R's. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The i plicant cosrleted Part I of the Initial Study. con acted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. Nr ,;adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result this'project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: 'Notices of Public Hearing have been siint to surrounding property owners and placed in the inland Yal.ley Daily Bulietia. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. REC OMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider a hpu a"5 elements of the Tentative Parcel Map 13803. - If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and i 'etc;+ of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. -4spectfully submitted, 1� Barrye R. Hanson Senior CivP' Engineer i BRH:BK:jh, Atta&tments:0 Exhibit "A° - Vicinity 'Map rnr l E0ibit "Bu ! Tentative Ma �7 J Exhibit CuSite Plan p3 � ? Resolution and �:', - Recommended Conditions of Approval 1 1 � III I f E9ft, { •. �1J � �' r : r ®yam FQQTH LM�4�. !.* 1plemme 6R9R y - INITY MAP ENGWMtMG DMMON 3 l f. At CQ ig w5 o i I _ l I I , Ito ICA tu C`3 z !olqj !�1 r•a a ca Jf 1 0 LU uj L�'I I 1•.. o-�n a f .a I z.LVN I n 31 oil •uINori Ln :oD p• p n RESOLUTION NO. !1 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION:-O?!r'�iE CITY 01�, \� RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDICIONALYY\`APPROVING)) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13808, LOCATED ON""THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF FUTURE D 'CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 2297021-10, 15, 19 & 28 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13808, submitted by Hughes Investments, aPPJ,Lcant, for the)purpose 'of subdividing into 16 parcels, the real property situated, in the City of 'Rancho Cucamonga,, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APaN(s) 225-021-10, 15,.19 & 28, located on the south side of Foothill' Boulevard, west of Future6-6ay Creek Boulevard; and ; WHEREAS, oi! July 10, 1991, the Planning Commission hele) a duly . advertised public hea•ring for"the above-described map. NGWI THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the,following findings have been made: 1• That the map is consistent with the General'?] 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdiv' 2n is consistent with the General Plan. {tf 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the propo esdsubdivision .and improvements will not cause substantial environme ntal damage or public health, problems or have adverse affects on abutting g ro ertia P P SECTION 2: .This Commission finds and certifies that the project hits: been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California' Environmentall` Quality Act of and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 1 SECTION Tentative Parcel Map Number 13808 'is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special, Conditions: x _ PLANNING COMMIISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT. P.M. 13808`- HUGHES,INVESTMENTS: July 10, 1991 Page 2 ' l I. _Pursuant to provisions of California Public 'Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall"not be operative, vestedior final, nor will building permits be issued or a map record:ca,'until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Sup i,i sors 11 of the County of San Bernardino, and (2) any and all\,required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish auki Game -Code Section 27,11.4, together with any required handla.\ charges,, are paid to 'the County Clerk of the county of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Depaortiment with a 'stamped and conformed" copy of the 'NOD together`"tl-th a receipt showing that all,feee have been paid. ,In the event this application is le± rmined exempt from such filing fees,pursuant to the provi!1�ons of the California Fish; } and Game Code, or the guidelines - =glgated thereunder,, except for payment of'.-any required handl).)ng charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition' shall be deemed null and void. 2. Provide necessary right-of-way and construct Foothill Boulevard full width from Rochester Avenue to Route 15. Sidewalk and parkway landscaping shall be constructed along the south side of the street from the centerline of Day Creek Channel to the centerline of the Southern California Edison Corridor on the east' side of Day Creek Boulevard and may be deferr�d for the remaining portion of the street unti4 develcpcnen,G' of the adjacent property. The limits of the off-site improvrments may be reduced if approved by the City Council. 3. ;Provide necessary right-of-way and construct Day Creak Boulevard/Pioneer Way full width from Foothill- Boulevard to Rochester Avenue. Sidewalk and parkway landscaping may be deferred until development Of the adjacent,- for the portion west of the centerline of Day Creek Channel. 4. The developer shall be eligible ,for fee credit against and reimbursement from the Transportation Development Fees for the portion of the improvement on Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Way,determined by the City Engineer to be of supplemented size and length or capacity over that needed for the impact of the development in conformance with City Policy. In addition the developer may request a reimbursement agreement ,I f �� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 3 Ask to recover the cost of off-site street improvements from future d +lcpment of the adjacent property for non-backbone Improvements. ;i Construct drainage facilities; as follows: a. All facilities Vwithin Day Creek Bouleba'rd/Pioneer Way from , Day Creek Channel to north ofQ'thill Boulevard as necessary to serve and protect the si�f} and b. Reconstruct the existing channel par311e.`1�to 'the Freeway, as necessary 4s aprroved b the cit En gince'r:. Y Y 6. Acquire easements and construct interium drainage facilities as determined necessary in the final drainage study to protect the site from=ows__fr_om the north or as 1�therwise approved by the ' City Engineer. 7. Construct traffic signals at the intersections of Foothill' ._. Boulevard with Day Creek Boulevard ~End Rochester Avenue wit�ll Pioneer Way to the satisfaction of"�-Ie>City Engineer. The developer shall be eligible for fee credit against and reimbursement from the Transportation Development Fees for construction of the traffic signals beyond 'those needed to Y mitigate the impacts of the development in conformance with,City policy- S. Construct a traffic signalat the project°s main entrance on Day Creek Boulevard to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, 9. An in-lieu fee as cont�,bution to the fut4re undergrounding of the existing overhead�atilities (electrical, except for 66 K.V. electrical) on the oppc_a to `'side of ?brow Route shall be paid to the City prior to approval of Final Map orOiss�lance of building permits, whichever occures first. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of the I-15 Freeway right-of-way to the center of Day Creek Channel, 10. A temporary easement for a Foothill Boulevard detour for the Day Creek Project shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City- Engineer. Improvements within ` this easement cannot' be constructed until the construction of the Bridge on .Foothill Boulevard is complete. 11. Landscaping within the area of concern intersections and for all -,project driveways -shall be approved by `the City Engineer.. - c 1} r. PLANNING COMMISSSON RESOLUTION NO. TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHE:-)1!V 9TMENTS a July 10, 1991 J Page 4 12. Construct drainage facilities within Pioneer "ay as determined ' necessary by a Final Drainage Study approved by the City ?t Engineer considering the area,bounded by Pioneer'Way# Rocheser Avenue, Foothill Bou7��Vard and Day Creek Channel. 13. The maintenance of the parkway on the east sids of Day Creek i Boulevard/Pioneer Way from the east side of the Edison Corridor to Foothi7-'� ,Boulevard including Lot "A" shall be the responsibilety oflithe shopping center. Lot "A" shall be included in Parcel 11. 14t Approval from Southern California 'Edison shall be provided for ;i the construction of the service driveway within±,their easement .or provide proof to the satisfaction of the City Engineerr and City Attorney that the driveway can be legally constructed. 15. the service driveway on-roothill Boulevard shall be 35 feet 1V width as measured at the right-of-way line. I 16. The developer shall make a good faith 'effort to acquire the - required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public, improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so the developer shall, at least 124 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the!1 Aft improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City squires tha property interests required for the improvements.- Such agreement' shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs ,ncurred by the City to acquire the off- site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in ' the form of-a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the develo>:art at developer's costa The- appraiser shall` have been 4pproved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisai4( _ 17. Easements for , public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-or-way shall bn dedicated to the City, wherever they ensoach onto private property. h 18. Additional street' right-of-VAy shall be dedicated along"right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the ,. right turn lane, amaintenance�arallel street tree easement ' ICI shall be provided. t• 1 ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES iNVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 5 19. A separate set of plans irrigation landscape and irri g P . per EngineOring _ Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the°'City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, The following landscaped areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: a. Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard Medians. - b. Foothill Boulevard and Pioneer Way parkways adjacent to the Edison Corridors. 20. Parkway landspaping, on Foe'thili Boulevard° and Day Creek Boulevard shrill conform to the `results of the respective Beautification Master Plan. ,+ 21. Reciprocal parking shall be providc��zby C.C. & R' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS lath DAY OF July, 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF-RANCHO CUCA14ONGA Larry T. McNiel, Chairman �Z I ATTEST: Brad Buller,; <retary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and: adopted by the Planning Commission. of the i; City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held ` on the 10th day of July, 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS. NOES': COMMISSIONERS: - ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: J � " 24 . rg itsIr �y PY y ` it g � i , P.` 3I!!; � ��� -fig � � w•� _ J • S e P lei UJI 45 fl h Z ' _9 fit Usti U a •:� � Yf� � w! E i'is 3 fix - y _ �. YM !.� 40 v� ta4 YPiY M�C "i9w Y t/�L�J \ � �•1 S 3 4'L Lam.• V�fl. � V �p0 . qp 6p.• =YY pp YOB e QVVY yyY _ n _ N Yy E aY @ C V a-Y li NY Y �� by � V If g0 NC at i 11141 MBA Z ! a � o a a �• 7, aR w� i` ►M t`�.: s$ ® e �GI a-XaI4_:.�. A y v ai ' 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1 �1 DATE: July 10, 1991 TO: ciC''rman and Members of the Planning commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary. � a SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS z. BACKGROUND Traditionally the Planning has reviewed membership approximately every six Months. Design Review Committee appointments were last reviewed out February 13, 1991, and it was determined that they would next be reviewed in July 1991. The current membership is as follows: ~ COMMERCIAL/INDUS!Z97AZ, RESIDENTIAL SuzYPne chitisa Larry McNiel Wenay Valletta Peter Tolstoy Alternate: John Melcher A history of Design Review committee membership since January 1988 is attached As Exhibit A. II. RECOMMENDATION: i Tr..h Planning Commission should determine appropriate membership of the Design Review Committee. Res ully i�d, Bra le city Planner = ` vj BB'GS/gs Attachmentu: Exhibit A — Design'Review Committee Membership History ITEM CC Y ,i 1;:6SIGN-REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP January 1988 to present \ COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL `--% January 1988 - July 1988: Larry McNiel Suzanne Chitiea Peter Tolstoy David Blakesley Alternate:. Bruce Emerick July 1988 February 1989: Larry McNiel Suzanne Chitiea Peter,Tolstoy Bruce Emerick Alternate: David Blakesley February 1989 - June 1989: Suzanne Chitiea Ii Larry McNiel Peter Tolstoy' t Bruce Emerick Alternate: David Blakesley June 1989 - February,- ,1990: Suzanne Chitiea C' Larry McNiel Peter Tolstoy David B]!�;sley Alternate: Betsy Weinberger February 1990 - Apr41 1990: Suzanne Chitiea Larry McNiel Peter Tolstoy Betsy Weinberger Alternate: David Blakesley May 1n90 - September 1990: Suzanne„Chitiea Larry McNiel Peter �Ilstoy Betsy Weinberger Alternate:,. John Melcher September 1990 - November 1990: Suzanne Chitiea Larry MS,Niel r-r- Peter Tolstoy John Meicher, November 1990 - February 1991 Suzanne Chitiea Larry McNiel j Peter Tolstoy Wendy Vallette Alternate: John`Melcher February 1991 - present Suzanne Chitiea Larry McNiel Wendy Vallette Peter Tolstoy o' Alternate: John Melchar i Exhibit A CITY^=1'RAP.TCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT x _ DATE: July 10, 1991 TO: Chairman: and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner ;i - BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT:, TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITPEE APPOINTMENTS the terms of Commissioners Tolstoy and,McNiel (Alternate) will expire on I July i7, 1?91. Therefore, .the planning Commission needs to either reappoint _or make new -appointments. The new terms would expire on July 27, 1993." For your information, the Trails Advisory Committee is „currently composed of the following members: Ter,*Expires: Suzanne Chit.Toa* July 27, 1492 Peter Tolstoy* � y 27, 1992 Pamela Henry** 1 21, 1991 Mark Whitehead**' June`16, 1992 Greg Pilcher* July 27, 199 Alternate: harry McNiel* * Appointed by Pi.snninq Commission ** Appointed by Park and Recreation Commission t> 1 Respectfully subaitted, Bra uller Cit Planner BB:DC:mlg' \3 j ITEM.'DD 1 , 1 � 1: