Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-28 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 01-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15651, SUBDIVIDING 7.34 ACRES INTO 2 PARCELS, LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF ROCHESTER COURT, SOUTH OF 6TH STREET - APN: 229-263-08. A. Recitals. 1. Marc Dale and Associates filed.an application for approval of Tentative Parcel Map 15651, for the purpose of subdividing into two parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN: 229-263-08, located at the terminus of Rochester Court, south of 6th Street, which is hereinafter referred to as "the application." 2. On January 16, 2001, the City Planner approved Development Review 00-73 for the subject property; and 3. On March 28, 2001, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on March 28, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed tentative parcel map is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and Development Code; and b. The improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Development Code and General Plan; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment; and e. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the Negative Declaration adopted on January 16, 2001, (for the industrial development portion of the project) and that the proposed subdivision of 7.34 acres into 2 smaller parcels is to facilitate the approved industrial development; no further environmental review is required. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-28 TPM 15651 — MARC DALE & ASSOCIATES March 28, 2001 Page 2 4. Based upon the findings of approval and conclusion set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the Tentative Parcel Map subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference: Planning Division 1) The conditions of approval for Development Review 00-73, as contained in the City Planner's letter dated January 16, 2001, shall apply. Engineering Division 1) The approved conditions of Development Review 00-73, as contained in the City Planner's letter dated January 16, 2001, shall apply. 2) Provide full street improvements for Charles Smith Avenue and Rochester Court per "Local Industrial' street type and/or Cul-De-Sac per City of Rancho Cucamonga City Standards. 3) Provide proof of existing street dedication on Charles Smith Avenue. 4) Complete the 10-foot wide drainage easement traverse closure to point of discharge to public storm drain, catch basin location. 5) Obtain and provide proof of off-site drainage easement from the parcel property owner to the south of the subject site. If unable to obtain easement, provide drainage facilities to discharge flows to Charles Smith Avenue. Provide a drainage study and install facilities subject to City Engineer review and approval. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY C arty T cNiel, Chairman ATTEST- Brad Secre I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of March 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-28 TPM 15651 — MARC DALE &ASSOCIATES March 28, 2001 Page 3 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15651 SUBJECT: APPLICANT: MARC DALE AND ASSOCIATES LOCATION: TERMINUS OF ROCHESTER COURT, SOUTH OF 6TH STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 33 Feet total feet on Charles Smith Avenue 33 Feet total feet on Rochester Court(cul-de-sac design) 61 Feet total feet on Rochester Court (Bulb) I / 2. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. 3. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. B. Street Improvements 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Charles Smith Ave. X X X X X X Rochester Court X X X X X X SC-12-00 1 Project No. TPM 15651 Completion Date 2. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: (1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. C. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. D. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. SC-12-00 2 Project No. TPM 15651 Completion Dale E. Improvement Completion 1. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required. F. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. G. General Requirements and Approvals 1. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first, for: Rochester Court. 2. Prior to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under current Assessment District among the newly created parcels. SCA 2-00 3