HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-49 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 01-49
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO
ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 94-02, IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 208-101-23.
A. Recitals.
1. On June 22, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted
Resolution No. 94-60 and approved Entertainment Permit 94-60.
2. Following the receipt of a complaint on March 21, 2001, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed hearing on May 23, 2001, took public
testimony, and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on May 23, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. On March 21, 2001, a complaint was received regarding nuisance problems
including loitering.
b. Coffee Klatch is in close proximity to a liquor store and both businesses share the
use of the parking area.
C. To provide compatibility of uses for both businesses, there is a need to define the
use of the outdoor patio with live entertainment and to have monitoring of patrons outside so as to
avoid potential nuisance problems.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The conduct of the establishment and the granting of the modification to the
Entertainment Permit would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare.
b. The premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or
disorderly manner.
C. The applicant has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction
with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-49
EP 94-02 —COFFEE KLATCH
May 23, 2001
Page 2
d. The granting of the modification to the Entertainment Permit would not create a
public nuisance.
e. The normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet
of the surrounding commercial center.
f. The applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of
material fact in the required application.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this
Commission hereby approves the modification of Entertainment Permit 94-02 subject to each and
every condition set forth below and incorporated herein by this reference:
Planning Division
1) All conditions of approval contained in Resolution 94-60 shall apply.
2) An employee or a security guard from the shopping center shall be in
the outdoor patio area when live entertainment is occurring and 50 or
more patrons are present to monitor the outside crowd and discourage
patrons from creating nuisance problems.
3) This Entertainment Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning
Commission in September 2001.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY 2001.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
arty T.&INiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bull ecretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 23rd day of May 2001, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO