HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-87 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 01-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2001-00549, AMENDING
LOT BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE VERY LOW
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND ESTATE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan
Amendment DRC2001-00549, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 26th day of September 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on September 26, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the Very Low Residential District
and Equestrian/Rural Overlay District; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific
Plan Amendment; and
C. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-87
ESPA DRC2001-00549 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
September 26, 2001
Page 2
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code;
and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can
be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant
effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment
DRC2001-00549 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
,
BY:
any T. iel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bull creta
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 26th day of September 2001, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT DRC2001-00549,AMENDING LOT BASIC DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND ESTATE
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN,
PERTAINING TO HORSE KEEPING, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan
Amendment DRC2001-00549 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission, after conducting a duly noticed
public hearing and concluding said hearing on that date, adopted Resolution No. 01-87,
recommending approval of said application to the City Council.
3. On the day of 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on , 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
C. The proposed amendment will further the objectives of the Equestrian/Rural
Overlay District by providing for sufficient lot depth and rear yard setback to accommodate the
keeping of horses.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
ESPA DRC2001-00549 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Page 2
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific
Plan; and
C. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Etiwanda Specific Plan;
and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Council herebyfinds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance
with the California Environmental QualityAct of 1970,as amended,and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder,and further,specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15061.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2001-00549 by the adoption
of the attached Exhibit"A."
6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Etiwanda Specific Plan Part H,, Chapter 5
BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Fig 5-2
VL LM LM**
Lot Area:
minimum average 25,000 10,000 6,000
(in square feet)
minimum 20,000 7,200 5,000
(in square feet) r:
r.
Number ofDU's 1/20,000 177,200 1/5,000 f 1/5,000
(per lot area in square 2 max/lot 'e 4 maxAot'..
feet) 4
max/bt
Lot Dimensions:
minimum depth i 95' 100' 90'
ZOO
minimum width 90' 60' 50'min.
(at required 50%of
front setback) lots-55'
min.
minimum frontage 40' 40' 30'
(at front p.l.)
Setbacks:
front 4 30' 25' 20'avg.
j vary t5'
♦'-
side(street) ;!j 2 25' 25 15'
side 20 10/20 0'/15 0'/15
Total 15' Total 15'
building separation 15'min.
except
where
adjacent
2 stories
-20'min.
rear29� 20' 15'
& bpt
Lot Coverage 2 Ab 225% 40% 50%
(maximum%)
5-9 8/96