The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-109 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 01-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCTVCPA01-01, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH STREETSCAPE STANDARDS KNOWN AS THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRCTVCPA01-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment is referred to as"the application." 2. On the 12th day of December 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 12, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to Foothill Boulevard located within the Terra Vista Community Plan. b. On September 19, 1991, the Terra Vista Community Plan was amended by Ordinance No. 457 to establish certain streetscape and site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard District. C. The application will expand the streetscape design by establishing uniform street furniture, hardscape, and other elements along Foothill Boulevard, thus unifying the streetscape, promoting cohesiveness, and preserving Historic Route 66. b. The application will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-109 DRCTVCPA01-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 12, 2001 Page 2 b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and C. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRCTVCPA01-02 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2001. PLANNING CO MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 5 arty TOAcNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad B Secretary I, rad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCTVCPA01-01, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH STREETSCAPE STANDARDS KNOWN AS THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. DRCTVCPA01-01, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance,the subject Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment is referred to as"the application." 2. On the 12th day of December 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On_day of_2002,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on , 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to Foothill Boulevard located within Terra Vista Community Plan. b. On September 19, 1991, the Terra Vista Community Plan was amended by Ordinance No. 457 to establish certain streetscape and site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard District. C. The application will expand the streetscape design by establishing uniform street furniture, hardscape, and other elements along Foothill Boulevard, thus unifying the streetscape, promoting cohesiveness, and preserving Historic Route 66. b. The application will not have a significant impact on the environment. r CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRCTVCPA01-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and C. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Council herebyfinds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental QualityAct of 1970,as amended,and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further,specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRCTVCPA01-01 by the adoption of the attached Exhibit"A." 6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. \, ;,�., � M.. rte. �• „Ij•� illy .amu 1 - �i�, S FOOTHILL BOULEVARD JIM DESIGN SUPPLEMENT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DESIGN SUPPLEMENT Amending the Terra Vista Community Plan, Victoria Community Plan, and Industrial Area Specific Plan. I. INTRODUCTION WHAT IS THIS SUPPLEMENT ABOUT? On September 16,1987,the City Council approved the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan(FBSP).The FBSP was enacted to provide a unified development scheme for the Foothill Boulevard corridor through the community.Of prime importance to the FBSP are the special streetscape design provisions which"tie" together the visual aspects of this commercial roadway. *missing Link' Area Victoria r/ Terra Vista I �� ,u I Industrial Specific Plan ►a ui ui si a i a W W W Y � _ '! W _J = V Q Figure 1 -Missing Link Area The portion of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and the Interstate 15 Freeway(1-15)was not a part of the specific plan study,therefore,its provisions did not apply to the development of this"miss- ing link."At the time of the FBSP approval,the City Council and Planning Commission expressed a desire to include significant design provisions of the plan in the development of the"missing link."This amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan(TVCP),the Victoria Community Plan(VCP),and the Industrial Area Specific Plan(ISP)is proposed to include specific shwtscape design provisions of the FBSP in the develop- ment of the properties adjacent to Foothill Boulevard. WHERE DOES IT APPLY? The following provisions will apply to all properties bordering Foothill Boulevard within the TVCP, VCP,and ISP.This amendment augments the development regulations and standards of the TVCP,VCP,and ISP.When an issue,condition,or situation occurs which is not covered or provided for in this amendment or provisions of the TVCP,VCP,or ISP,the regulations of the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are most applicable to the issue,condition,or situation shall apply. DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 Page 2 SAI EXHIBIT"A2" II. COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT • The Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement is intended to extend the concepts of the Foothill Boule- vard Specific Plan to the"brisling link"through the creation of a dynamic concourse that is attractive and of high quality with a unifying community design image reflective of the community heritage and identity, providing an economically viable setting for a balanced mixture of commercial and residential uses with safe, efficient circulation and access. A. GOAL: Create a community image that expresses and enhances the unique character and identity of Rancho Cucamonga. B. OBJECTIVES• Develop a streetscape system which designates major intersections as activity centers and emphasizes the suburban parkways between the activity centers as vehicular areas. Promote compatible building elevations which afford a human scale at pedestrian areas and provide transitions to buildings of greater height,while protecting ad ohft residential conditions. . Promote appropriate ape treatments throughout the corridor,particularly those that are low maintenance,drought tolerant,and wind resistant within intense urban conditions. Provide for the control of visually objectionable views,such as outdoor storage and loading areas,through proper site design and screening. C. : Develop consistent streetscape and architectural palettes which are sensitive to creating a"heritage" statement for Foothill Boulevard. Require compliance with community design guidelines in plans for new development and expansion or redevelopment of existing development and make community design a major consideration in site plan review and approval. Utilize landscape materials which are clean,safe,wind resistant,and relatively low maintenance. Formal forms and configurations should be utilized at activity center nodes while less formal configurations should be utilized throughout the parkway links between nodes. Designate special landscape and architectural features at major intersections.Combine thematic plantings with contemporary architectural statements designed to promote a distinctive character for the activity centers.Changes in paving materials,lighting,signin&and siting of adjacent structures should occur at major intersections to enhance their distinctiveness. �. DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT•A3"" suvraaaerrww 7At Page 3 III. DESIGN GUIDELINES A. ACTIVITY CENTERS: Activity centers are selected intersections along the Foothill Boulevard corridor defined as Mane"or Statement"areas which"tie" together the visual aspects of the Foothill Boulevard corridor through the city, promote concentrated activity at these areas,and give identity and theme to the areas in which they are located.The activity centers are located contiguous to Foothill Boulevard as indicated in Figure 2 ACTIVITY CENTERS •42 O yj Miim Mi W � M r = J W _J = � V • e Figure 2-Activity Center Locations Because three corners of the Haven Avenue intersection are fully or partially developed,the devel- opment provisions of the activity center are limited to those streelscape and landscape improveitents within the public right-of-way.Therefore,many of the following standards apply only to the Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue activity centers: 1. Strwtscape: a. All building orientations will relate to the Foothill Boulevard frontage.The building setback areas will be enhanced pedestrian zones with special hardscape materials,formal landscape arrange- ments,and pedestrian level lighting. fLX� addGJ b. Streetscape elements such as bollards,crosswalks with special paving materials,li ht agard tree G�v�iPA� furni d orm throe ut a Foothill Boul and do� PSR Tr{ItL �( ovr i1iSIJ � �MYKod�/�t�1T C. The concept within the activity center is to incorporate a formal,regularly spaced, street tree planting system utilizing a palette of informally shaped,Colorful trees d. The urban or formal str eetscape design characteristic of the activity center should extend along Foothill Boulevard and secondary/intersecting streets to a point of logical transition to the suburban parkway.Typically,the design will extend to at least the fist driveway or as modified through the 0 design review process The extent of the urban streetscape should be able to adjust to changes in public right- of-way conditions,such as right tum lanes arid bus bays DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 page 4 7A1 EXHIBIT"A4" 2 Site Planning: a. At activity centers,buildings may be placed at or adjacent to the front setback line to create a more appealin&active streetscape.Front yard areas of parking lots dominating the streetscene are sP-�iiflcallY Prolubited. b. Multistory buildings shall be designed to relate to the pedestrian level.All ground story facades shall be designed to relate to the human scale.This can be accomplished through the breaking of facades into bays and the signage brought down in size and location..Further,this reduction in scale can be established through the use of elements which add horizontal articulation to the facades.Examples of these elements include pedestrian arcades and awnings.(Milliken&Rochester only.) C. Buildings shall be designed to eliminate a fragmented,strip commercial appearance and should be oriented to the activity center(Milliken&Rochester only). d. Architecture and outdoor spaces along Foothill Boulevard shall be integrally designed and oriented toward the pedestrian experience.The experience should be visually diverse and stimulating and should include activities that create a sense of variety and interest(Milliken&Rochester only). e. Structures,pathways,and landscaping shall be incorporated within the site so as to ensure ease of access from one site to adpirft sites in a safe manner. f. Building entrances shall be designed to accommodate logical pedestrian access from the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way.This may include direct entrances from Foothill Boulevard, separations in the buildings that allow access to the interior plaza areas,or other appropriate methods. 3. Architectural Concept: a. Within individual activity center, the architectural style should be consistent to provide continuity of design at the intersection 1. Milliken Activity Center-There are no existing buildings located at the Milliken activity center intersection As a result,the Development Review process will establish the flavor for the area when reviewing the development proposals.New developments need not"duplicate"the architectural style of previous submittals but must be compatible in terns of architecture and orientation with the other corners)of the intersection. 2. Rochester Activity Center-New proposals shall consider and respect the architectural style of existing buildings.For example,the Aggazzotti Winery at the southeast corner of Foothill and Rochester,is a potential National Historic Registry candidate.Any proposals for this activity center should be designed to be compatible with this structure.This does not mean that new proposals must emulate the architectural style of the winery but,rather,that they must complement existing buildings. b. Differentiate the ground floor facades from the secondfloor in recognition of the differences in the character of activities at the ground floor level.Examples include,but are not limited to,the use of storefront glass,stepped-back or tiered forms,fenestration,and other appropriate architectural features facing Foothill Boulevard,Milliken Avenue,and Rochester Avenue. DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 • EXHIBIT"A5" SUPPLDAENMU VI Page 5 4. LandSC8pe Concept:The activity centers shall be distinguished from suburban(informal) parkway areas through the use of formal,urban tree plantings.These formal plantings shall border all activity centers and shall define these areas as being higher intensity,urban districts.The plantings shall consist of an offset double row of Gape Myrtle(Lagerstroemia indica)trees along each road frontage.Addi- tional plant materials(evergreen canopy trees,palms,etc.)may be introduced to supplement the Gape Myrtle as a backdrop.The type and location of the additional materials should be based on the particular buiding design,scale,and setback �a.;4wr-.md nawr,W4011A /t' tA'4/l1ONvni6 a Kt/wl�rrM.u»1 /J��:.nr\eNGO rrgifML '.IG'crc' 4✓r/,mscsegNvlr+s7' I rSa'eF nswuv avertro .arrYoa n"+•w I �� ssvvE. AIIMMF \ 4 � r • � rte. OJ+1-r+a�CJMY.1rIRr•w NMIOMY Fll�NI1 al\1 rM111\ �.MOf��•J n.AAAV Lfl'rW li!! NMO.YY WV,, t'Rxrov a vnrr. crewa\uc ... Ik'MWg� �••f�IfW`.rµ�iesAa�ewf Formal Street or aj� i w Tree Planting s..• .- 74 Street Access to .mt�ef-.�`�� Two Story Building Enriched Placa •` "=' e p C•..•: d: Paving Fountain Element �I Enriched Croce Walk Paving I 5113 i i j �0 ftardik ACMITY CENTERANTERSECTION CONCEPT GEN IZ FW� MorWaL tgcUD(Ia�ordcG ,. R Y�`'IFkO�f�NFJT /4Anl. Colonnade Entry 3 DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 Foundation orm 7,91EXHIBIT"A6" Plaanti B. ,SUBURBAN PARKWAYS:, 1. Streetscape: a. The parkways will be designed with informal clusters of trees,rolling turf berms,and meandering/undulating sidewalks evoking pastoral,suburban qualities. —Tc—x+ aJJed b. Si eetscape elements such as bollards,crosswalks with special paving,light standards, and street furniture shall be identical in style and finish to those used in the FBSP area* ftp j300LEVARD/RoL�rF_ 66 U/Sdk4L /NPAW044-tewr Ra4�1 . 2 Architectural Concept: a. The amhftectural characteristics shall be governed by the existing standards of the Development Code,IVC P,VCP,and ISP. b. In situations where buildings are highly visible from the side streets and/or adjacent parking areas, special emphasis shall be placed on seating architectural interest 3. Landscape Concept:The plantings will consist of informal treatments,dominated by London Plane(Platanus acerifolia),California Sycamore(FUtanus racemosa),and Flowering Plum(Primus cerasffers)trees.Other species may be used to accent and/or supplement these designated tree types.The type and location of these species should be reviewed in conjunction with specific development proposals. C. PARKWAY TRANSITIONS: In order to provide a gradual transition from the urban activity centers to the suburban,informal parkways,"parkway transitions"will be introduced along the corridor. Parkway transitions are designed to blend the formal hardscape and tree planting pattern of the activity centers with the informal landscape and hardscape treatment of the suburban parkways.Specifically,the parkway transition is characterized by a 75-foot to 150-foot zone,dominated by Flowering Plum trees.Other tree species may be introduced to supplement the Flowering Plum to assist in creating a smooth transition r r�. M/. /I H 'RWM /MHHA✓>tid I/'•NI• /•r I/ M 6' Meandering Sidewalk Primary Parkway Accent Tree (Flowering Plum) DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 Tree (Sycamore) Mounded Turf EXHIBIT"A7" . Figure 5- Parkway Transition aIyPLEM@n`PM 7/91 Page 7 D. GENERAL GUIDELINES: 1 Site Planning: a. Buildings shall be sited to create new pedestrian spaces that complement and expand the existing pedestrian rights-of-way along Foothill Boulevard.This can be accomplished by creating plazas and allowing wider sidewalks on the boulevard. b. Buildings shall be designed and placed to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. Driveways and service areas shall be located to avoid interfering with the flow of pedestrian circulation in and around the site. C. All auto related facilities(ie.working bays,storage,etc.)shall be oriented/screened away from public view. d. Buildings should be oriented to encourage restaurants,services,limited retail uses(as permitted by the applicable Community or Specific Plan),and other high intensity pedestrian uses on the ground levels of all buildings within activity centers. 2 Parldng Lots: a. Whenever possible,entries shall be located on side streets in order to minimize pedes- trian/vehicular conflicts.When this is not possible, the Foothill Boulevard site entry shall be designed with appropriately patterned concrete or pavers(behind the public rightof-way)to differentiate it from the sidewalks. • b. Parking access points,whether located on Foothill Boulevard or side streets,shall be located as far from street intersections as possible. C. Parking areas shall be designed so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving vehicles and minimize the need for the pedestrian to cross parking aisles. d. Individual project parking areas shall be linked with on-site driveways which are clearly identified and easily recognized as connectors.New development projects shall delineate on all plans where vehicular connections to adjacent properties are located.The applicant must also demonstrate provi- sions for access easements for such vehicular movements to adjacent properties consistent with approved piaster plans. e. Parking areas shall be designed in a manner which link the building to the street sidewalk system to encourage and facilitate pedestrian movement.This can be accomplished by using design features such as walkways with enhanced paving,trellis structures,and/or landscape treatments. 3. Landscape Design: a. All street furniture,light standards,bollards,and similar hardware within 10 feet of the public right-of-way shall be painted a color chosen as the Foothill Corridor Theme Color.Sign faces may vary and match related architecture. b. A colorful landscape edge shall be established at the base of buildings.Asphalt edges at the base of structures are prohibited.Plant materials in containers are appropriate. DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT"AB" suPPLEMMOPM Page 8 7/91 C. Internal pedestrian circulation,linking office complexes with neighboring commer- cial or office developments,should be located dose to buildings. d. Planting dusters should assume a non-uniform arrangement.The diversity of massing types should be great enough to provide interest but kept to a level which evokes a relaxed,natural feeling to the observer. e. Water conserving plantings and irrigation shall be used in all landscaped areas. (Refer to City Ordinance No.411-Xerismpe.) 4. Streetscape Llghting: a. It is the intent of streetscape lighting to add a consistent,planned look for Foothill Boulevard during day and evening hours.Lighting can have a dramatic effect on the quality of the streetscape design b. All lighting fixtures in the public right-of-way shall be consistent along Foothill Boulevard and approved by the City Engineer following recommendations of the Planning Commission Materials shall be consistent and in keeping with the desired theme.Poles and supporting hardware shall be consistent with City standards. C. All development anus outside the public right-of-way shall use high pressure . sodium fighting.All direct fight rays shall be confined to the limits of the building site. IV. CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS A. Center Median Program -Based upon traffic analyses,a continuous 14-foot wide raised landscaped median shall be provided on Foothill Boulevard.The median can provide benefits necessary to accommodate increased development and traffic demand in the following areas: ■ Increased vehicular capacity ■ Increased vehicular/pedestrian safety ■ Increased vehicular mobility ■ Increased vehicular level of service Median breaks shall occur only at major signalized intersections as determined by the City Engineer. Alternate median breaks may be considered subject to a detailed traffic safety analysis and subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. B. Median Design -The 14-foot wide median shall be designed to provide access control and a unifying landscape statement.The median will feature two basic types of planting.Accent tree planting (Crape myrtle),underplanted with a low evergreen groundoover,will be provided at median noses.Ever- green trees(Rhus lancea),underplanted with shrubs and groundcover,will be planted throughout the . balance of the median.(See Figure 6.) DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT"A9" BWPIEM@TPM 7/91 Page 9 MEDIAN ACCENT TREES (CRAPE MYRTLE) TRIANGULAR SPACING AT is 6' CURB W1 W/TB'CONCRETE PAVER MAINTENANCE EDGE RIM LANCEA W O.C. MAJOR EVERGREEN TREE ly MAINTENANCE EXPANSION JONT CONCRETE PAVERS IN TYPICAL 2%I . MORTAR BED 2%MM �V CONCRETE CURB. la" DETAIL SECTION 7'"0 -,- NTS PARKWAY/MEDIAN ACCENT TREE 'CRAPE MYRTLE MAJOR�E�A) MEDIAN TREE SHRUBS/GROUND COVER 6.CURB W//8' HARDSCAPE 5'4'CLEAR ZONE MAINTENANCE EDGE � .�. ..` - EDGE OF TREE SEANCE FROM S: EDGE OF MAIRENANCE EDGE SECTION TYPICAL MD BLOCK LOCATM Figure 6 - Median Design DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 791 EXHIBIT"A10" Page 10 V. SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Setbacks Activity Center (Suburban Parkway in parenthesis) Building 51eetsideW 1stF1oor Ind floor Parkin¢ Foothill/Milliken Activity Center. ■ Foothill 25'(45') 25'(*) 45(45'avg,30'min) ■ Milliken 25'(*) 25'(*) 45'(45'avg,30 min) Foothill/Rodtester Activity Center: ■ Foothill 25(45) 4Y(*) 45'(45'avg,30'min) ■ Rodiester 25'(*) 45 (*) 45'(45'avg,30'min) (1) As measured from ultimate curb face ( )Refer to TVCP,VCP,or ISP for regulations / 1:1 Building Setback Ratio ... �. 2nd Story Permitted at Milliken �J r i/ t "Y 3J, k t i' 70' Figure 7 - Activity Center Building Setback DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 guppLEMEMWM EXHIBIT"Al I" Page i l ' - t Rei Prope*Line lujdiag Pig ■ Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential 25'(*) 15'( ) Development ■ Adjacent to existing or Planned Commercial 0'(iIE) 5'(*) Development Interior Side Proof Line DIdlding Parking ■ Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 2S ■ Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 5 (*) 5'(*) B. Height L Unitetions- ActlWfv Centers (1) ■ Within 45!of street curb face: , Foothtu Boulevard(at h iiliken) 35' Foothill Boulevard(at Rodxstet) 2(P Milliken Avenue 35' Rochester Avenue 20' ■ Within 100'of single family residential district 231 ■ Other locations ( ) ■ Towers,campaniles,rotundas W (1) Refer to TVCP,VCP,ISP for suburban parkway areas. ( )Refer to TVCP,VCP,or ISP for regulations DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT"Al2" suPPLBOarMM Page 12 7191