The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-39 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 02-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. DRC2001-00544, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR 16 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT NO.16021, IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 227-121-30 AND 43. A. Recitals. 1. Crestwood Corporation filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No.16021, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of April 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on April 10, 2002, including written and oral staff reports,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the northwest comer of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way with a street frontage of 580 feet and lot depth of 650 feet and is presently undeveloped; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is single family residential, the property to the south consists of the railroad right-of-way(a planned multi-purpose regional trail),the property to the east is single-family residential, and the property to the west is single-family residential and undeveloped land; and C. The application contemplates development of 16 single-family lots on 7.53 acres land within the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and d. The General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on April 10, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan;and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-39 DRC2001-00544 - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION April 10, 2002 Page 2 b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and C. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Environmental review was completed with the tract and original development review for this site and approved by the Planning Commission on December 8, 1999. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been adopted, no further environmental review is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The proposed project, 16 single-family residences, is within the scope of the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration. Based upon the facts and information contained in the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with written and oral staff reports, the Planning Commission finds that there are no substantial changes in the project or the site and its surrounding conditions that would require revision to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. All environmental mitigation measures from the previously approved tract and development review shall apply to this project. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Division 1) The project shall construct the East Avenue theme wall as the tract boundary on East Avenue (stone pilasters with stucco walls and river rock planters) per Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2) All pertinent conditions, including environmental mitigation measures, contained in the Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 16021 and Tree Removal Permit 99-23 shall apply. 3) Extend front porch slab area for a minimum of 6 feet in depth. Engineering Division 1) All applicable Conditions of Approval and Standard Conditions, including environmental mitigation measures, per Planning Commission Resolution No. 99-117 shall apply. 2) It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone D designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA, prior to issuance of building permits. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-39 DRC2001-00544 - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION April 10, 2002 Page 3 3) If the existing residences on East Avenue maintain their access from East Avenue, the Landscape Maintenance District will not maintain those areas' frontages because they will not be sealed off with a wall nor will ultimate street improvements be installed. The frontage maintenance will continue to be the responsibility of the adjacent homeowners. Where a solid wall is constructed along East Avenue, then the ultimate street improvements can go in and the City will maintain such areas as a reverse frontage along with the rest of East Avenue. 4) Sidewalks adjacent to walls shall be 5 feet wide (Sections F-F and G- G). If adjacent "Not-A-Part" homeowners do not agree to maintain these sideyards, they shall be rockscaped per the tentative tract conditions. Environmental Mitigation 1) Environmental Mitigation measures contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 99-117 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2002. PLANNINZ:N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: � L rry T. c iel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bull ecreta I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of April 2002, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: TT 16021 Applicant: Jon Friedman Initial Study Prepared by: Rebecca Van Buren/Emily Wimer Date: December 8, 1999 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoi frig Timing of Method of Verif led Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 4 - Construct an interim water detention basin to be CE B Final map C 1 located in TT 15912. The detention basin shall be recordation completed prior to occupancy. - Construct Etiwanda/San Sevairie Area 8 Master CE B Prior to A 2 Storm Drain facilities in East Avenue from the construction north tract boundary to and including the relocated permits interim basin In Tract 15912. +fI18 ICC h,. 'r ,. �t6 Install temporary asphalt sidewalk from the CE B Prior to A 1 northern boundary of the project to Victoria construction Avenue for pedestrian safety. permits C 1 Transportation Development Fees shall be paid in Prior to anticipation of a City project to.install a traffic CE D construction signal at the intersection of East Avenue and permits Victoria Street. z, 'a*F"w¢Sa 01.0��' : .x. �r m « y+. a r_ x��"<� . # ,�`.�+, ,;✓ �,i. �^L4. r ,..-y.,,. -+""4,R�. e:, i"��'�z'tl ek• Btcloglcal �esourcesti b ' �� : Replacement windrows of 15-gallon Eucalyptus CP D Ongoing A 1 maculata planted 8-foot on center shall be required to mitigate the loss of the mature windrows to be removed. , i'mEz— '^ l•„* FT*"e ° °. y'`.. " ^`, tr Jam! ^x '�Y"i#r, ":aN y�'am"`c:y.d J ft '�;�xrr”�y a* e..{e .e.. in -fa n >:; n.tz, za:r, . , .t - Install fire sprinklers in lieu of secondary access. FC B Prior to C 2 construction permits Key to Checklist Abbreviations Re'taponSiblOPBrSon � �JlonitoringFrequency t � Methodvotveriflcatlona� ;, my"n` sanctronsf'4g, � aa " y CDD—Community Development Director A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP-City Planner or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit . CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO—Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating - 5 Retain Deposit or Bonds FC-Fre Chief or designee 6-Revoke CUP