Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-55 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 05-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR THE EXTENSION OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16226, FOR A SUBDIVISION OF 265 LOTS ON 92.78 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(2-4 UNITS DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE NORTH ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE, EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD,AND WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0225-071-37, 48, AND 50, AND 0225-081-08, AND 11. A. Recitals. 1. BCA Development filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226 Time Extension request is referred to as"the application." 2. On July 24, 2002, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 02-77, thereby, approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On July 13, 2005,the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on July 13, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226 is in substantial compliance with the City s current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; b. The extension of the Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226 approval will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and C. The extension of the Tentative Parcel Tract SUBTT16226 approval is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and d. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. 3. An Environmental Impact Report(State Clearinghouse No. 88082915)was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino as a Master Environmental Impact Report for the University/Crest Planned Development in June 1991. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-55 SUBTT16226 - BCA DEVELOPMENT July 13, 2005 Page 2 Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report. In October 1999, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 98121091) because of a revision to the University/Crest Planned Development. In August 2001, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement. The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the project that would require a major revision to the previous Environmental Impact Report. Based upon the facts and information contained in the certified Environmental Impact Report, together with all written and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment. a. There have not been substantial changes in the project that require major revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of no new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects. b. There have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. C. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Environmental Impact Report was certified as complete, that shows any of the following: 1) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report; 2) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Environmental Impact Report; 3) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives,which are considerably different from those analyzed in the final Environmental Impact Report, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tentative Map Applicant Expiration SUBTT16226 BCA Development July 13, 2006 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY 2005. PLANNING COMMISSIO OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4�-� BY: I Rich Macias, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-55 SUBTT16226 - BCA DEVELOPMENT July 13, 2005 Page 3 ATTEST: G Brad ecretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of July 2005, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE