HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-88 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 06-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2006-00772, AMENDING
SECTION 17.02.140 DEFINITIONS, AMENDING SECTION 17.08.060.A.
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND ADDITIONS, AND AMENDING
SECTION 17.08.060.C. PROJECTIONS INTO YARDS, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment
DRC2006-00772, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 11th day of October 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on October 11, 2006, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs
1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for the development,within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code;
and
C. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-88
DRC2006-00772 - DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 11, 2006
Page 2
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code;
and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is statutorily exempt from
the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA
Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines
because it can be seen with certainty that this text amendment will not cause a significant effect on
the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination
of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of
exemption.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby forwards to the City Council a recommendation to approve Development
Code Amendment DRC2006-00772 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2006.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: 0., — e
Pam S rt, Chairman
ATTEST: g
Ja s R. Troyer, AICP, SeRtretary
I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 11th day of October 2006, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McPHAIL, MUNOZ, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS