The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2000/03/01 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. March 1, 2000 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Ma. vor Pro Tern Paul Biane, Councibnember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Bob Dutton, Councihnember Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 City Council Agenda March 1, 2000 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander , Biane , Curatalo Dutton __., and Williams ~ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing March as Red Cross Month. Presentation of a check for $10,000 from the Friends of the Library to the City Council for the purchase of library books. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar item~ are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: January 19, 2000 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/9/00 and 2/16/00 and Payroll ending 2/3/00 for the total amount of $3,536,032.00 3. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for Texaco (transfer of license), Equilon Enterprises, LLC, 11289 Base Line Rd. 4. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Jersey's Pizza of Rancho Cucamonga (transfer of license), Allyn Hoover Kruse, Karen Jeanne Kruse and David Martin Widor, 11849 Foothill Blvd., Unit A. 5. Approval of a Resolution approving the application for grant funds for a Used Oil Recycling Block Grant Sixth Cycle Application from the Used Oil Recycling Fund under the Used Oil Recycling Enhancement Act. 1 16 18 20 City Council Agenda March 1, 2000 2 RESOLUTION NO. 00-034 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE USED OIL RECYCLING FUND UNDER THE USED OIL RECYCLING ENHANCEMENT ACT Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. RESOLUTION NO. 00-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES 7. Approval for the replacement purchase of fleet vehicles from various dealerships located within California, selected through request for proposal in the amount of $60,335.08, funded from Fund 72-4225- 7045 and $47,900.00 from Fund 1-4647-7045, and Funds 40, 41, 43, 45, 46, 4130-7045. 8. Approval to award and authorization of the contract in the amount of $118,310.84 ($107,555.31, plus 10% contingency) for the construction of the Beryl Street Rehabilitation from Base Line Road to Cielito Street, to the apparent low bidder, Laird Construction Co. Inc. (CO 00- 006), to be funded from Measure I Fund, Account No. 32-4637-9518. 9. Approval to award and execution of Professional Services Agreement to Park Specialities (CO 00-007) of Fallbrook, California, for the installation of poured-in-place rubber playground surfacing at Etiwanda Creek Park playground, in the amount of $84,495.00 ($76,814.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Fund 20, Account No. 20-4532-9912. 10. Approval of an Agreement (CO 00-008) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District establishing financial padicipation in the Foothill-Hermosa Storm Drain Project. 11. Approval of an Agreement with LSA Associates, Inc., (CO 00-009) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Repod for General Plan Amendment 99-06, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99- 03, Development District Amendment 99-06, Parcel Map 15427, and Conditional Use Permit 99-63. 22 23 24 27 28 31 34 39 City Council Agenda March 1, 2000 12. Approval of an Agreement with San Bernardino Associated Governments (CO 00-010) for the preparation of a Trail System Master Plan within the former Southern Pacific Baldwin Railroad Corridor. 69 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following requirements. testimony. items have no legal publication or posting The Chair will open the meeting to receive public NoltemsSubmitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. CONSIDERTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY INCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT (JAIBG} FUNDS TO THE REGIONAL JUVENILE CRIME ENFORCEMENT COALITION (RJCEC} IN SUPPORT OF AN INTER-AGENCY PARTNERSHIP TO PROMOTE YOUTH, SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY SAFETY 70 City Council Agenda March 1, 2000 RESOLUTION NO. 00-036 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY INCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT (JAIBG) FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING (OCJP) TO THE REGIONAL JUVENILE CRIME ENFORCEMENT COALITION (RJCEC) CONSIDERATION OF A CO-SPONSORHIP OF HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH'S 2r~D ANNUAL SOAPBOX CLASSIC AND MEGA-FUN PLAY DAY TO BE HELD ON MAY 31, 2000, AT THE EPICENTER SPORTS COMPLEX AND WAIVE ASSOCIATED FEES AND CHARGES CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION TO WAVIE BASE RENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER TO ALLOW FOR ITS USE BY LOCAL HIGH SCHOOLS FOR TWO DOUBLEHEADER BASEBALL GAMES FOR A ONE-YEAR TRIAL BASIS CONSIDERATION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH L. D. KING, INC. (CO 00-011), TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE METROLINK STATION EXPANSION, PHASE II PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $219,718.40 ($199,744.00 PLUS 10%)TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 151-4637-9932 72 73 76 80 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE CONCEPT OF A RED LIGHT AUTOMATED CAMERA ENFORCEMENT PILOT PROGRAM TO BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2. DISCUSSION OF NAME FOR THE NEW HIGH SCHOOL (Oral Discussion) 3. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 13--THE SAFE DRINKING WATER, CLEAN WATER, WATERSHED PROTECTION AND FLOOD PROTECTION ACT 82 85 City Council Agenda March 1, 2000 RESOLUTION NO. 00-037 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 13, THE SAFE DRINKING WATER, CLEAN WATER, WATERSHED PROTECTION AND FLOOD PROTECTION ACT 9O J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the city Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 24, 2000, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. January 19, 2000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A, CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, January 19, 2000, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, Legal Counsel; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Shelly Munson, Info System Specialist; Lorraine Phong, Info System Analyst; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Rodney Hoops, Police DepaTtment, Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Proclamation commending Pete Fotia, the Inland Valley Football Coach of the Year. Proclamation presented to Pete Fotia. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation commending Nick Fotia, the Inland Valley Football Player of the Year. Pete Fotia introduced his son, Nick Fotia. Mayor Alexander presented him with the Proclamation B3. Presentation of a Proclamation commending the Rancho Cucamonga High School Football Team on its recent C.I.F. Division 5 Championship. Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to the entire football team from Rancho Cucamonga High School with all team members receiving a copy of the Proclamation. B4. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing Eadh Day 2000. Proclamation presented by Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator. Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator, informed the Council about the activities that are planned for Earth Day 2000. City Council Minutes Janua~ 19,2000 Page 2 B5. Presentation of the North American Hazardous Materials Management Association (NAHMMA) Award to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Waste Haulers. Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator, and Sam Spagnolo, of the Fire District, talked about the SHARPS Program which was the reason for the award. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Steve Rentoria, 11100 Kenyon talked about the closure on Highland. He did not think this should happen and that it was intolerable. He felt freeway traffic would impact Fairmont. He also talked about the negative impact that would occur because of the high school kids having to travel the fleeway to get to school. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 12/22/99 and 12/29/99 and Payroll ending 12/19/99 for the total amount of $2,509,175.18. D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of December 31, 1999. D3. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Albertsons, Inc. (transfer of license), Haven Ave. and Town Center Dr.. D4. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale General for Chianti Ristorante Italiano (transfer of license), Baldeesh Kaur Dhaliwal, 8045 Vineyard Ave., Unit 1,2,6, & 7. D5. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Round Table Pizza (transfer of license), Phillip Michael Karros, 7201 Archibald Avenue, Suite 8-10. D6. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Discount Liquor Warehouse (transfer of license), Shalu Corporation, 10277 Foothill Boulevard. D7. Approval of the plans and ~peci~cations for the modification of traffic signals and intersection lighting at Carnelian Street and 19 Street (SR 30) and authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids," to be funded from Transportation Systems Development Funds Account No. 22-4637-9811. RESOLUTION NO. 00-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT CARNELIAN STREET AND 19TM STREET (SR 30) IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS City Council Minutes January 19,2000 Page 3 D8. Approval of request for Waiver of Epicenter Expanded Parking Lot Rental Fees for the Local Chapter of the California Association of School Transportation Officials' School Bus Roadeo to be held on March 24 & 25, 2000. D9. Approval of a request to summarily vacate an excess of Terra Vista Parkway East Right-of-Way for the proposed Terra Vista Park #6, located on the north side of Terra Vista Parkway East, easterly of Terra Vista Elementary School. RESOLUTION NO. 00-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF AN EXISTING TERRA VISTA PARKVVAY EAST RIGHT- OF-WAY FOR TERRA VISTA PARK #6, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKVVAY EAST, EASTERLY OF TERRA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL D10. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securityy for CUP 99-04, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Catellus Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 00-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 99-04 Dll. Approval of release of a Real Property Agreement and Lien Agreement (CO 00-001) for Parcel Map 8815, located on the west side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street and north of Base Line Road. RESOLUTION NO. 00-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM HOUTZ AND SONS, A PARTNERSHIP, FOR PARCEL MAP 8815 D12. Approval to execute an addendum to the Epicenter Rental Contract (CO 92-064) with Rancho Cucamonga High School for graduation ceremonies at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter in exchange for City use of Rancho Cucamonga High School's Gymnasium for City's Youth Basketball program. D13. Approval of Drainage Easement Dedication authorizing the execution of an Agreement (CO 00- 002) providing for maintenance of said easement and granting a sub-easement to enter and maintain the drainage easement in accordance with the terms of said agreement for DR 99-32, located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Amethyst Street, submitted by Sunrise Rancho Cucamonga Assisted Living, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 00-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION OF A DRAINAGE EASEMENT, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT PROVODING FOR MAINTENANCE OF SAID EASEMENT, AND GRANTING A SUB-EASEMENT IN FURTHERANCE THEREOF City Council Minu~s January 19,2000 Page4 D14. Approval of Change Order No. 6 in the amount of $271,271.37 ($246,610.34 plus 10%) for Contract No. 99-078 for the installation of Fibre-Optics Conduit from Foothill Boulevard to Fire Station #2 located on San Bernardino Avenue and to the City Library located at 7368 Archibald Avenue by Terra-Cal Construction, Inc., to be funded from Account No. 72-4225-7044. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DCA 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Development Code regarding thrift stores, second-hand stores, antique shops, and pawn shops. ORDINANCE NO. 619 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-05, AMENDING SECTION 17.02.140 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING DEFINITIONS FOR THRIFT STORES, SECOND-HAND STORES, ANTIQUE SHOPS, AND PAWN SHOPS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 619. MOTION: Moved by Willjams, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 619. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. APPROVAL OF A FIREWORKS DISPLAY AGREEMENT (CO 00-003) AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDING FOR A JULY 4'", 2000 COMMUNITY CELEBRATION AND FIREWORKS SHOW AT CHAFFEY COLLEGE Staff report presented by Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent. City Council Minutes January 19, 2000 Page 5 MOTION: Moved by Willjams, seconded by Dutton to approve CO 00-003. Motion carried unanimously Councilmember Curatalo thanked Chaffey College for their support of this. H2. UPDATE ON CENSUS 2000 ACTIVITIES Staff report presented by Brad Bullet, City Planner. ACTION: Report received and filed. H3. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM THE INLAND EMPIRE PHILHARMONIC FOR A VVAIVER OF EPICENTER STADIUM FEES FOR A MEMORIAL VVEEKEND FREE COMMUNITY CONCERT TO BE HELD ON SATURDAY, MAY 27, 2000. Staff report presented by Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II. Nell Birnbaum, Executive Director Inland Empire Philharmonic, talked about the event and thanked the Target Stores for their support. David Parker of the Rancho Cucamonga Target Store stated he supports the event to strengthen the family. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to approve the waiver ofthe fees. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. I. COUNCIL BUSINEBS I1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Report received and filed, J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J1. Councilmember Willjams stated someone she was talking with had asked for an update on what is going on at the northwest corner of Foothill and Carnelian and asked that a report come back at the next meeting. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated he could provide the information now and reported the developer is hoping to break ground hopefully within the next 30 - 60 days and that there was supposed to be an Albertsons Center developed there. Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, stated they have pulled their permits. Councilmember VVilliams stated if they do not get started they need to get that site cleaned up and asked for Mr. Buller to pass that along to them. J2. Councilmember Biane stated he would recommend that a special meeting be scheduled to hear Mr. Georgiou's appeal. City Council Minutes January 19, 2000 Page 6 Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated staff is working on getting a date to hold the special hearing. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC K1. George Georgiou stated today he was planning on coming to the City Council meeting and call for the resignation of Mayor Alexander for defying the City's Ordinance. He added that apparently someone has read the Cify's Ordinance and understands that the Council has to hear his appeal. He also felt Mr, Gomez should apologize publicly for stating that Mr. Georgiou was confused, He stated they are not going to go forward with the meeting for his appeal unless the Council states it will be heard under the laws that existed on April 19, 1999. He felt the Council was giving him the run-around. Mayor Alexander stated it was just stated that staff is in the process of setting a date for his appeal which will be heard before the Council. Mr. Georgiou stated he wants to know what laws the appeal will be heard under. He stated he also wants to know how much money was spent on the City Attorney to give him the run-around. James Markman, City Attorney, stated first of all the City Attorney did not charge the City one dollar more than is already covered under the retainer to deal with Mr. Georgiou. He stated he has not changed his opinion that by the time Mr. Georgiou articulated an appeal, the Council had set up a technical Board of Appeals to hear Mr. Georgiou's appeal. He stated the law in effect at the time of processing is the law that applies. He stated the City Council is giving Mr, Georgiou the opportunity to address his appeal before them. He stated Mr. Georgiou can seek legal advice if he wants to. He stated even if the Council does not grant his appeal to him, he still feels he can have his appeal heard before the Building Board of Appeals to hear these types of technical matters. He added the law that was in effect at the time Mr, Georgiou's wall was constructed is the law that will apply to his issue with the Building Official's decision that the wall was properly constructed. K2. Bill Hawkins, 4987 Ginger Court, felt the Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles and possibly the Washington, D.C. offices were covering their butts. They have a vested interest in keeping the facts covered up. He did not think they wanted to be responsible or deal with a multi-biffion dollar problem. After careful review of technical accuracy from recent Army Corps reports, he received a joint letter at 3:30 p.m. today from Senators Boxer and Feinstein to FEMA indicating they have doubts about the accuracy of the data which is on file in the City Clerk's office. He stated they currently have over 2,000 signatures from residents in the City of Rancho Cucamonga that they are sending to the Senators' office requesting congressional hearings. He stated FEMA will be responding within two weeks to this letter. James Markman, City Attorney, asked him if he submitted the petition. Mr. Hawkins stated the petitions are going to the Senators' office. Item K3. AI Hozek, 4972 Clover, stated he does not share Mr. Hawkin's opinion of what has been going on at Haven View Estates. He wanted to share his viewpoint and quite a few others that live in Haven View Estates. He stated they are not in the path of the levee and that a lot of money has been spent to fight this. He felt the Haven View Board is acting illegally. He added he has sent out a survey to get more input about this. He wanted to notify the Senators of the motives of some of those that live in Haven View. He stated they would like to put a stop to this and asked for the City's help. He stated he wanted to bring to the Cify's attention there is another side to this matter. He asked for the City's help with all of the money the homeonwer's association has spent. Item K4. Tom Bradford, 5066 Granada, stated the Board at Haven View is elected and represents the homeowners and that the people can vote them out if they are not happy. City Council Minutes January 19, 2000 Page 7 Item K5. Pat Domioni, a property owner of RC5, stated she is also speaking for a lot of other homeowners in Haven View Estates and advised that they do not know what is going on with the Association. She stated if she had known what all was going on with the Association and all of the lawsuits, she would not have built there. She stated she requested information from the Management Company and the City, and that only the City provided the information she requested. She stated the highest part of the levee is only 15'. She stated she basis her opinion on the Army Corps' information and that she does feel safe where she lives. She stated the Homeowners Association does not have her approval to do what they are doing. Item K6. Leo Orinvanos, 10987 Carriage, stated that he is glad to see the Senators are asking for the safety study. He stated all of the people he knows are in favor of the safety study being done. Item K7. Bill Ford, owner of the Lauren Development and resides in Haven View Estates, talked about the residents that are opposing their project and the extent they have gone to in order to find out about his employees. He stated they were served subpoenas at their homes instead of the Lauren Development offices. He commented on issues previously brought up regarding the Department of Fish and Game and also various safety issues. He stated that the Haven View group wanted the Army Corps to give their approval, which they have, and now they are going against Jim Markman. He stated this is not against all of the above issues that were mentioned, but it is about people that don't want him to develop his properly. He felt the staff, City Council and everyone else associated with the City has acted appropriately. Item K8. Susan Bowerly, 8681 Avalon, wanted to remind the Council why people moved here is because of undeveloped aesthetic space. She did not think the City needed more homes or an Albertsons. She felt the Council should consider undeveloped land. Item K9. Joseph Passoff, 10718 Carriage, stated he just wants to make sure his house is safe if the levee is removed. He just wants to make sure he will not get flooded out. He stated he would like a second opinion from someone such as FEMA. Item K10. Hugh Hewitt of Hewitt-McGuire, wanted to thank the City Council for their patience stating he wanted to talk about the letter from the two Senators. He stated the Council should not pay attention to the letters but only the letters from the Army Corps because it is a safe condition. He wanted to thank the Council for trying to protect its residents and would be talking to his law students about this matter. He complimented the Army Corps and the Council for standing up to all of the threats. Mayor Alexander asked Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, to comment on some of the statements that had been made. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Mr. O'Neil would give an update. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated there has been a lot of data collected from both sides of this matter and has been carefully analyzed. He stated this information has been transmitted to the Army Corps' Los Angeles office. He stated after reviewing the information the Corps has stated the Deer Creek Reception Levee, which is the levee everyone is talking about, is not a permanent or functional part of the Corps' Cucamonga Creek project.. He commented on the expertise and reputation of the Army Corps. He stated the Corp is certifying that this project meets the FEMA criteria for a 100 year flood, He stated the Corps also concludes that the Deer Creek Debris Basin capacity is adequate to handle the 100 year flood, and the Deer Creek Channel capacity, is nearly twice the estimated 100 year capacity. He stated the Corps also goes on to note that the seismic stability of the Deer Creek Debris Basin is found to maintain its integrity and function as a debris basin during an earthquake. He added the Corps states there are three deflection levees that are owner, operated and maintained by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. He stated these provide protection over and above what is already provided by the Deer Creek Debris Basin. He continues to state that the Army Corps Washington, D.C. and the San City Council Minutes JanuaW 19, 2000 Page 8 Francisco offices have all concluded that the Los Angeles office has made a thorough and proper analysis of the issues. He also pointed out that the City requires standards as provided by the Army Corps of Engineers and San Bernardino County Flood Control. He stated staff has concluded that the Corps has acted appropriately under the guidelines of good Engineering standards. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to adjourn. meeting adjourned at 8:33 p.m. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Respectfully submitted, The Approved: Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: O2-Oe-DO RUN DATEz 02/09/00 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ** CHECK# OVERLAP 3324 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES REGISTRATION # 148203* 1,725.00- <<< 148204 - 148295 5668 IES-APA MEETINGS 148296* eO, O0 14 ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY AIRLINE TICKETS # 148297* 51000 <<< 148~8 - 148298 3324 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES REGISTRATION # 148299* 1,380.00 l~<< 148300 - 148305 1247 8LA~E PAPER CO., INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES # 148343 31;2.99 4699 BORDNER, MARQIE INSTRUCTOR PMT 148345 493,50 21820 BRIGANTE, MICNELLE RECREATION REFUND 148346 50,00 CITY OF RANCH8 CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-09-00 (99/001 RUN DATE: 02/09/00 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARP ANT. 4369 BRODART BOOKS 21811 BRUNDAgE, CANDI 1168 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES 552 BURK-[~LACKSCHLEgER, ROSEANN 4772 BYRD AND ASSOCIATES, INC P.M. 6107 C A L T A C 5156 CAOLEIS APPLIANCE 21821 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS' ASSOC. 21823 CALTRANS 21818 CARDENAS, INELDA 2571 CARDINAL INDUSTRIAL FINISHES 4538 CARPENTER'S WOOD SHOP 21813 CAVALIER, MARCUS 21822 CCPOA 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIgN SERVICE 21799 CHANDRAMOULI, RADHIKA 6052 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 713 CHICK'S SPORTINg gOODS INC 5958 CHIVERS AUDIO BOOKS 21807 CHU, YOUNg 74 CITY RENTALS 949 CLARK, KAREN 21810 CLARK~ MARILYN 6464 COASTAL BUILDINg SERVICES 5337 COASTAL BUSINESS MACHINES, INC. 85 CUCAMONOA CO WATER DIST 21816 CUDNEY, JOANNE 21804 CURRY, CLARA 4488 DAOHDEVIRIAN, KATHY 284 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, INC 2478 DAPPER TIRE 5121 DE VOOOHT~ SCOTT d. 60 DELTA DENTAL 107 DETCO 839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 41154 DIETRICH, KAREN 274 DIETZ TOWINg 5744 DIRECTV 41155 DIZAYE, ZEYNEP 41156 DJAFROODI, SHEILA 1962 DURA ART STONE 41157 DUYMICH, MICHELE 4205 DYNAMIC ORAPHICS~ INC. 4937 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTINg 3364 EIGHTH AVENUE gRAPHICS LIBRARY SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PMT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION REFUND EQUIPMENT REGISTRATION FEE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION REFUND MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND ADVERTISING FEE RECREATION SUPPLIES LIBRARY SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MONTHLY WATER BILLINOS RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DENTAL INSURANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE RECREATION REFUND VEHICLE TOWINg SUBSCRIPTION RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND OFFICE EQUIPMENT RECREATION SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES ** CHECK~ OVERLAP # 148347 453.22 148348 3100 148349 264.00 # 148379 6,508.76 # 148383 1,422.52 148396 58.95 # 148397 669.67 148398 95.25 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIODI 02-09-00 199/00) RUN DATE: 02/08/00 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. 3814 ELITE TOWING 4537 ESCOM SOFTWARE SERVICES 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 4486 OUARDIAN 41168 QUTIERREZ~ CARMEN 6277 GUZMAN, LESLIE 6236 H R S USA 6383 HV CARTER CO 4525 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 6084 HADDON, DAWN 32183 HADIPOUR, ELAHEH 6127 HANGER 18 5699 8ARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 32176 HARRINGTON, DONNA 32814 HOOD~ SUZETTE 32211 HOOVER, VICKI ** CHEC~ OVERLAP TOWINg SERVICE ~ 148399 237.50 REGISTRATION 148400 3~54800 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 148401 21~842.60 FACILITY RENTAL 148402 3~080.00 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES # 148403 443,55 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ~ 148404 250.80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 148405 5000 RECREATION REFUND 148406 33.00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 148407 319.49 DELIVEBY SERVICE # 148408 288.74 RECREATION REFUND 148409 84,50 RECREATION REFUND 148410 40,00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 148411 81, 51 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 148412 1~040,00 OFFICE SUPPLIES # 148413 59.91 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 148414 18~142.95 LIBRARY BO0~S # 148415 198.40 LIBRARY BOOKS ~ 148418 276,98 MILEAQE REIMBURSEMENT 148417 21.78 RECREATION REFUND 148418 45,00 RECREATION REFUND 148419 39 SO TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 148420 126.41 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 148421 29700 RECREATION REFUND 148422 4500 RECREATION SUPPLIES 148423 24.48 L. EQISLATIVE SERVICES 148424 2,30000 REIMBURSEMENT 148425 23.00 SUBSCRIP'TION 148426 15,00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 148427 93.68 RECREATION REFUND 148428 36;00 REIMBURSEMENT 148429 13, GO <<{ 148430 - 148431 MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS ~ 148432 7~568.30 MEDICAL PREMIUM 148433 717.76 RECREATION REFOND 148434 44.00 CONTRACT SERVICE 148435 70.00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND ~ 148436 35126 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND ~ 148437 124.18 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 148438 266,56 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 148439 72.80 RECREATION 148440 121,00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 148441 6800 RECREATION SUPPLIES 148442 159.10 RECREATION 148443 160.00 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 148444 1117.82 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 148445 915.00 INSTROCTOR PAYMENT 148446 288.00 RECREATION 148447 72,00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 148448 140.08 RECRESTION 148449 112,00 RECREATION 148450 84.50 RUN DATE: 02/09/00 PAGE: 4 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT. ** CHECK# OVERLAP 4852 HOPKINS, LORI MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 148451 50000 161 HOYT LUMBER CO., S.M. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 148452 4[552 2412 HOYT, RAYMOND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 148453 904.80 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 148454 220.81 167 I C B O - CITRUS BELT CHAPTER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 148455 21.55 6513 IAPMA RECREATION REFUNDS 148456 150.00 6386 INDUSTRIAL SIGN ~ GRAPHICS RECREATION REFUND 148457 470.81 4611 INLAND EMPIRE DRIVE LINE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ~ 148458 306.32 3736 INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN. MEN'S SOCCER PROGRAM 148459 371.50 5682 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ~ 148460 931.05 6202 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 148461 236.00 2315 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 148462 145.46 612 JAESCHKE INC, CR. VESICLE MAINTENANCE # 148463 6,788.25 32185 JIMENEZ, LINDA RECREATION SUPPLIES ~ 148464 131.00 32181 JOHN, RUTH RECREATION 148465 35.00 4700 JONES, KEITH INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 148466 17280 32197 JREIJE, MARIE RECREATION # 148467 79.50 32215 KADAR, YESHODA RECREATION 148468 25.00 32195 KAISSI, TINA RECREATION 148469 45.00 32199 KELLER, LISA RECREATION 148470 45.00 3491 KELLEY gLUE BOOK NEW CAR PRICE MANUAL # 148471 163.40 32205 KELLEY, WENDY RECREATION 148472 45.08 4128 KELLY EQUIPMENT VEHICLB SUPPLIES ~ 148473 1,38266 4551 KEMMER, JANICE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 148474 120.00 32192 KENNEDY, LOUISE RECREATION 148475 40.00 32177 KENYON~ MARJORIE RECREATION 148476 40.00 i49 KING, L.D. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 148477 2,412.00 6090 KONO, SOPHAK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 148478 48000 4982 KBRANDA CONSTRUCTION C.D. BG. 148479 21407.50 172 KOZLOVIDH, DEBDIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 148480 2,002.35 6516 KRUSE, JOAN A RECREATION REFUNDS 148481 1,120.00 32178 KUETTLE, GEOQIA RECREATION 148482 80.00 5411 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORPORATION RECREATION SUPPLIES 148483 258.60 193 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 148484 35,177.27 32179 LAPOINTS~ JAMIE RECREATION 148485 80.00 32191 LARVIE~ AMIE RECREATION 148486 10.00 5216 LAS ROSAS - EMMA SORCINI INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 148487 160.50 5199 LASER LINE LIBRARY 148488 74.95 32189 LASHER, CYNTHIA RECRESTION 148489 4447 LASTING IMPRESSIONS PRINTING CO. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 148490 511.81 32212 LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY P. JOHNS RECREATION 148491 175.00 32200 LAW, TOM RECREATION 148492 84.50 849 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 148493 87.23 197 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL DUES 148494 560.00 32210 LEVI, CHRISTY RECREATION 148495 84.50 6327 LEWIS OPERATING CORPORATION RECREATION REFUND 148496 8.50 2048 LITTLE TIRES COMMERCIAL PLAY SYS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 148497 27.43 6296 LIVE OAR DOG OBEDIENCE BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL 148498 768.00 1455 LONG'S DRUGS FILM PROCESSING # 148488 3152 5662 LOS ANGELES CODA COLA BTL. CO. RECREATION SUPPLIES 148500 474.46 200 LOS ANQSLES TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 148501 16. i0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-Oe-O0 RUN DATE: 0~/0~/00 PAOE: 5 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. 758 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC. MAINT/RECREATION SUPPLIES 148552 41.01 4841 PRESTON, MICHAEL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 148554 21600 RUN DATE: 02/09/00 PAGE: 6 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARP NO WARP+ ANT 32216 PRESTON, MICHELE 3286 PRINCIPAL LIFE 583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 4335 PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARINg AUTH CA. 4440 PUTMAN, BILL 5899 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVERS 6490 R & g QUALITY FENCE BUILDERS 251 R & R AUTOMOTIVE I890 R & R LIQHIlNQ 2980 R & S FLOOR COVERINg 2705 R H F, INC 1038 R J N DESIGN gROUP, INC, 4130 RBM LOCK & KEY SERVICE 545 RED WINg SHOE STORE 11969 REQALDO, EVA 5914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 6093 RHINO LININGS OF CORONA AND NORCO 6512 RIA gROUP 11970 RICE~ CHRIS 5618 RICHARDS~ WATSON, & QERSHON 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 11971 RO~ ROSA 3314 ROBINSON FERTILIZER 11791 RODRIQUEZ~ ELENA 11973 RODRIQUEZ~ POXANNA 11972 ROWE, RUSSELL 6171 S & K ENGINEERS 1292 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 4438 S C A C E 0 5745 SAFELITE gLASS CORP, 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11983 SPENCE, dANICE ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP RECREATION 148555 35.00 MEDICAL/DISABILITY INSURANCE 148556 78,874,91 PROTECTION SERVICES-LIONS CNTR # 148557 18834 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 148558 14,82 2ND QUARTER PREMIUM DEPOSIT 148559 1,634.00 WANg COMPUTER SERVICE 148560 306.22 OFFICE SUPPLIES 148561 50.48 RECREATION REFUND 148562 150.00 VEHICLE NAINTiSUPPLIES&SERVICE 148563 1~094.25 MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES # 148564 528.51 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 148565 2,970.00 VEHICLE MAINT SERVICE&SUPPLIES ~ 148566 469.72 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 148567 89.69 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 148568 69.51 SAFETY BOOTS 148569 450.00 RECREATION REFUNDS 148570 39.50 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 148571 978.73 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 148572 391.63 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 148573 156.24 RECREATION REFUNDS 148574 45.00 LEQAL SERVICES 148575 1,329,65 PRINTS # 148576 102.36 RECREATION REFUNDS 148577 39.50 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 148578 707.11 RECREATION REFUNDS 148579 6000 RECREATION REFUNDS 148580 20000 RECREATION REFUNDS 148581 45.00 RECREATION REFUND # 148582 6,957.50 RECREATION SUPPLIES # 148583 909.69 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 148584 100.00 SERVICE AND SUPPLIES 148585 258.07 RECREATION REFUNDS 148586 4000 RECREATION REFUNDS 148587 4500 REIMS PARKINQ CITATIONS 148588 830.00 CAL-ID PROGRAM 148589 25.00 CAL-ID PROGRAM 148590 260.00 RECREATION REFUNDS 148591 45.00 RECREATION REFUNDS 148592 84.50 RECREATION REFUNDS 148593 80.00 RECREATION REFUNDS 148594 20,00 RECREATION REFUNDS 148595 45 00 OFFICE SUPPLIES # 148596 20,944.51 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 148597 162+00 RECREATION REFUNDS 148598 40.00 RECREATION REFUNDS 148599 40.00 DAY CAMP SUPPLIES # 148600 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 148601 1,120.00 MONTHLY gAS BILLS # 148602 1~200.98 <<< 148603 - 148609 # 148610 19,863,86 148611 40.00 MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS RECREATION REFUNDS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LiST OF' WARRANTS FOR PERIODz 02-09-00 (99/00) RUN DATEz 02/09/00 PAOEz 7 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARE NO WARE. AMT, ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP 11984 SPENCER, DONNA RECREATION REFUNDS 148612 4500 6343 STADIUM SELF STOBAQE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 148613 525.00 11985 STAULA, MARY RECREATION REFUNDS 148614 lOO. O0 1373 STERLINO TRUCK EQUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 148615 294.50 11986 STUART, DAVE RECREATION REFUNDS 148616 7000 11987 SULLENS~ LORDIN RECREATION REFUNDS 148617 45.00 4733 SUNRISE FORD AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES # 148618 27273 3735 TANNSR, D.C. EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS # 148619 701.80 1151 TECHNIC OFFICE SUPPLIES 148620 ~45.00 11988 TELON, PAULETTE RECREATION REFUNDS 148621 39.50 5980 TEN SPEED PRESS VARIOUS LIBRARY SUPPLIES 148622 42.99 3942 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE # 148623 997.00 2718 TERRY~ DONNA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 148624 267.30 11989 TERZO-METZQER, LYDIA RECREATION REFUNDS # 148625 85.00 11990 THOMPSON, MIKE RECREATION REFUNDS 148626 58.00 6530 TITAN INDUSTRIAL FOOTWEAR CORP. RECREATION REFUND # 148627 3,577,53 3333 TODD, SYLVIA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 148628 137~5 FOR PERIOD: 02~0~?-()0 ('99/00) RUN DATE: 02/09/00 PAOE: 8 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR, AMT ~ IOTAL 584.411.43 CITY OF RANCMO CUCAMONGA LIST OF RARRANTS FGR PERIO0:02-1o-00 (99/00) RUN DATE: 02/16100 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ITEM OESCRXPTZON WARR NO WARRo ANTe 581 SAN BERN CLUKTY MT. VIEW TIkE GOOgYEAQ DEALER U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL NCIJRY A$50CiATION PHOTOGRAPHY ENGIN~CRZNb BURKE & A,F,W, S~EET METAL INC, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS ELECIRZC WHOLESALE SUBSCRIPTIONS MAINT SUPPLItS UNEERGROUND STORAGE TANK RECREATION REFUNDS CAL-IO PROGRAM <(< CITY OF RANCMO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-16-00 (99/00) RUM DATE: 02/16/00 PAGE: 2 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCREPTZON WARR NO WARR, AMT, 21838 130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO q907 CDNTRACTCRS EQUIPMENT 930 C0RONA CLAY COMPANY ~ldSl COVESTAFF SERVICES OF CALIF.,INC. 21a~6 COYE, FRAN 21357 CPRS DISTRICT X 88 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST Z1~69 CULLIGAN SCFT WATER SVC OP POMONA 239 D & K CONCRETE CO 2)12 O A R E AMERICA MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 5USINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REFUND OZSNZSSED CITATION LZBRAR~ SUPPLIES DEPOSIT REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUNO BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND OEPOSZI REFUND RECREAT10N REFUND ENGRAVED PLA~UE ADVERTISING FEE BUSINESS LECENSE REFUND 168705 111,00 168706 22°07 168707 33.80 168708 876.50 168709 188,00 168710 2,928.00 168712 51o00 148Y13 ISf800,O0 1A8716 70.00 1~8715 800.00 168716 125,00 148717 915.88 168718 1,283.75 1~8719 39°00 168720 96.18 168721 5.86 168722 69°00 CZTT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR P~R~OD: 02-16-00 (99/00) RUN OATE: 0Z/16/00 PAGE: ~37 GTE CALZFORNZA 6277 GUZMANt LESLZE 6466 H L H GENERAL CONTRACTORS 32261 HACZENDA PCCLS 3ZZ50 HALLe RDSE~ARZE 32ZZ9 HAMPTON CONSTRUCTZCN, SCOTT O0 CHECKe OVERLAP e 1A876Z AOJ,SZ 1~8163 39°44 # 148764 40,00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF ~ARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-16-00 (99100) RUN DATE: 02/~6/00 PAGES VENDOR NAME ZTEN OESCRZPTZON IARR NO MARRo ANT. 3ZZSZ LANEERT- SZLVA, CECZLZA 3222~ LAN OFFICE OF CRAIG T. FORMICA a49 LAMSON PROCUCTSe INCo 3ZZ53 LENTOf JULIt 3;25I LEWIS, STEPHEN I~55 LONG'5 DRUGS 200 LOS ANGELES 32Z6Z LOZOLLAm STEVE 32236 LUCENT TEChNDLOGZESe LYNTTON, MARGARET ~ CHECKA OVERLAP RECREATION 168814 A~oO0 BUSZNESS LXCENSE 1~8815 8°36 ~AINTENANCE SUPPLZES 148816 56,56 CITY OF RANCMO CUCAHONGA LIST OF ~aRR~NTS ~OR PERIO~: 02-16-00 (99/00) RUN DATE: 02/16/00 PAGE: 5 V~NDQR NAME LTEM DESCRZPT~ON WARN NO ~ARRo AMT. 317 319 12013 SO CALZF EEISQN SO CALZF GAS COMPANY SOCO AIR CONDITIONING CO SOUKUPe CYNTHIA SOUTHERN CALZF SHALL BUSINESS CENTR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FCR PERIOD: 02-I6-00 C99/00) RUN DATE: 02/16/00 PAGE:- 6 VENDOR NAME ITEM D~SCRIPTION WARR ND WARRe ANT. 3632 12010 12019 836 Izo37 SOUTHERN CALIF TRANE SERVICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHWEST INC ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN STARE OF CA,CEPARTMENT QF TRANS STEELWORKeRS OLDTIMERS PUUNOATION STEER 'N SIEIN OF CUCAMONGA STRACKf MARIA SUPERTEL SYMCAS-TSG, INC. SYS AOMEN TARGET TARGET SPECIALTY PR3DUCTS TAYLOR, JAhA TEAM UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CONSULTING GRP TENNANT CQ~PANT T~RRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION, ENC. TONY°S PIZZA SERVIC~ TRI COUNTY X-RAY SERVICE TYPECARE U C REGENTS U S BANK TRUST U S BANK TRUST D SPRINTING ULTRAMAR UNDERGROUND 5VC. ALERT OF SO, CALIP UNIFIRST UhIFjRP S~RViCE UNI~U~ CREATIONS UNITEU CALIFCRNIA FACTORS UPSCO VALENZUELAt FARIA VAN TECH VANS RTS, VANS, INC VARGAS, MARIA VA~QUEZ, RCSZE VICTORia AN[PAL HOSPITAL WALL STREET JOURNAL WARREN, EDNA WAXICe KLEEN-LINE CORP WEIR, JEWELL WELLS FARGC GUARD SERVICES WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY WESTERN ALLIED CORPORATION NILLOAN ASSOCIATES WINDROW STABLES 8~ CHECK# OVERLAP BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 1A8916 11.50 ((( 1~8917 - 1A8921 >>> MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS I 148922 32,29A.97 OUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 148923 170.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 148924 6,~88.36 OLCTIMERS FOUNDATION 1A8925 A63o57 UUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 148926 7.50 RECREATION REFUNDS 148927 117o00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 148928 6,60 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND I IA8929 3.000.00 SUBSCRIPTION 148930 39°00 YOUTH PROGRAM ~ DAY CAMP SUPPL m 148931 203.24 PAINT SUPPLIES 148932 AZ.6t RECREATION REFUNDS 148933 116.00 ~USINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 1~893~ 13,18 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND I 148935 4e800.00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 148936 5.I1 BIB PACKET OVERPAYMENT 148937 70e811.39 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 148938 36.00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 148939 7o20 TYFEWRITER REPAIRS 1~89~0 39.50 POCKET GUIDE IN8941 250.00 LEASE PAYMENT I 2489~2 766e525,55 LEASE PAYMENT 168943 56,095.11 GUIDELINE MANUALS 14894A 17,T8 ~USINESS LICENSE REFUNDS lq8945 23°33 UNC~RGRQUNU SERVICE ALERT 148946 235.75 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~ONGA L~ST OF W~RRANTS FCR PERZOD: 02-16-00 (09/00) RUN OATE: 02116100 PAGE: T VENDOR NAH~ ITEM DESCRZPTZON WARR NO ~ARR, AMTo ~ CHECKi OVERLAP lZO3e YENOVKIANe ELAZNE RECREATION REFUNOS 148972 44°00 120~9 YOSEMITE ~ATERS bUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 140973 33.00 TOTAL Z,ZBZm?13.80 State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) ABC 211 (6/99) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 3737 Main Street Suite 900 Riverside, CA 92501 (909)782-4400 DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: First Owner: Name of Business: Location of Business: County: Is premise inside city limits? Mailing Address: (If different from premises address) Type of license(s): 20 Transferor's license/name: File Number: 362866 Receipt Number: 1267746 Geographical Code: 3615 Copies Mailed Date: February 1, 2000 Issued Date: RIVERSIDE EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC TEXACO 11289 BASELINE RD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 SAN BERNARDINO Yes P O BOX 4453 HOUSTON, TX 77210-4453 RL::C;:jVED FEB 0 3 2000 City of Rancho CucamonC -- Division 336298 / TEXACO REFIN[ Dropping Partner: Yes__ No License Type Transaction Type Fee Type Master D..ILI2 Date 20 OFF-SALE BEER AN[ PERSON TO PERSON TRANSF NA Y 0 02 / 01 / 00 20 OFF-SALE BEER ANIZ ANNUAL FEE NA Y 0 02 / 01 / 00 30 TEMPORARY RETAIl DUPLICATE NA N I 02 / 01 / 00 Total Fee $50.00 $34.00 $100.00 $184.00 Have you ever been convicted of a felony? N o Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? Yes Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed pan of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in an on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF.CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date: Febmany 1, 2000 Under penalty of perjury. each person whose signature appears below, cctli~es and says: (I) He is an applicant. or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporation. named in the foregoing application. duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the fo,egoing and knows ,he co.=t, thereof a.d ,b.t ;cbt :fa; l,?dto a,. ,me; t,.t no pc= oth., than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest h i e be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filed with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC See 211 ~ignatmmre Pn~e D~rLINE Tract No. 12670- 3, M.B 182/90-93 Roncno Cucomongo City Tax Rate Area 15010 Application: Applicant: Address: Description: Type 20 (Off Sale Beer and Wine); Texaco Equilon Enterprises 11289 Baseline Road Existing business; transfer of license Site and Surroundin* Zoning: Site: Office Park, Terra Vista Planned Community North: Park Site, Tetra Vista Planned Community South: Medium Residential, Terra Vista Planned Community East: Neighborhood Commercial, Terra Vista Planned Community West: Medium Residential, Tetra Vista Planned Community ~) .~.~ (~ ,Assessor's Mop PKW~ ~NE I/4 Sec I VISTA ~ p ,/Book 1077 Page 67 ~TE~RA ~/S.,R.TW. Son Bernordlno Cm~ntv lo77- 67 State of California APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) ABC 211 (6~99) TO.'Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 3737 Main Street Suite 900 Riverside, CA 92501 (909)782-4400 DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: First Owner: Name of Business: C,...~i.. ,-~-co'~._ Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control File Number: 362730 Receipt Number: 1267084 Geographical Code: 3615 Copies Mailed Date: January 27, 2000 Issued Date: Location of Business: County: Is premise inside city limits? Mailing Address: (If different from premises address) Type of license(s): 41 Transferor's license/name: RIVERSIDE KRUSE ALLYN HOOVER JERSEYS PIZZA OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11849 FOOTHILL BLVD UNIT A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 SAN BERNARDINO Yes 12854 WARBLER ST GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324 Dropping Partner: Yes__ No ~ License Type Transaction Type Fee Type Master 41 ON-SALE BEER AND ORIGINAL FEES NA Y 41 ON-SALE BEER AND ANNUALFEE NA Y Dup Date Fee 0 01/27/00 $300.00 0 01/27/00 $205.00 Total $505.00 Have you ever been convicted of a felony? No Hav~ you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? No Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed pan of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in an on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Dam: January 27, 2000 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below. certifies and says: (1) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants. or an executive officer of the applicant corporation. named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or appIicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made: (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is .not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfilI an agreement entered into more than ninety i90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filed with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) KRUSEKARENJEANNE ~a.~,~ ~ ~,~,~ / Honcho C:ucamo~ga Tax Rate Area Gov't. Lot 2 16(~ M 180/97' 6~~g --SFDASTZAN- Application: Applicant: Address: Description: Type 41( On Sale Beer and Wine - Eating Place); Jerseys Pizza ofRancho Cucamonga Allyn Hoover Kruse; Karen Jeanne Kruse and David Martin Wider 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A Existing business: transfer of license: Site and Surroundiw, ZoninR: Site: Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 7, Industrial Park North: Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 7, Industrial Park South: Industrial Area Specific Plan. Subarea 7. Industrial Park East: Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 7. Industrial Park West: Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 7, Industrial Park 229-UI ,--__ %3 i ~,'~ARROW -J Parcel Map No. 13845, RM. 180/97-107 Par. Rochester M.B. 9/20 Note- Assessor~ Block 8~ Lot Numbers Shown in Circles. ROUTE .... 1 r-- Assessor~ Mop Book 229 Page OI Son Bernordino County THE CITY OF ~ANCIIO CUCA/'IONCA SmffRe rt DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: March 1, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR A USED OIL RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT SIXTH CYCLE APPLICATION FROM THE USED OIL RECYCLING FUND UNDER THE USED OIL RECYCLING ENHANCEMENT ACT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga approve a resolution for a Used Oil Recycling Block Grant Sixth Cycle application. BACKGROUND In 1991, the Legislature passed AB 2076(Sher), the California Oil Recovery Enhancement Act (Act). The Act requires oil manufactures to pay $0.04 to the California Integrated Waste Management Board for each quart of lubricating oil sold, beginning October 1, 1992. This Act includes a ten million dollar government "block grant" program. Block grant funds will be available to governmental agencies to establish and administer used oil collection programs. The Block Grant funds are a non-competitive fund and have very few requirements. The requirements are; the funds must be used for Oil Recycling related programs, the City pass a resolution, and there be one certified center per 100,000 population within the City limits. Block Grant funds are based on per capita (122,787- Population Estimates for California Cities and Counties. Report E-1 1999) of the City, at rate $.32 per capita, equating to $39,292.00 plus $3,045.00 ($0.025 per capita) for Used Oil Filter Recycling for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT USED OIL RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT March 1, 2000 Page 2 The Sixth Cycle of the Used Oil Recycling Block Grant is for three Fiscal Year allowing most cities the flexibility to carryover unused funds for special projects requiring larger funding. We do not anticipate taking advantage of this option at this time. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been using Block Grant funds since Fiscal Year 1994/95 to support the operation of it Household Hazardous Waste facility, provide promotional materials including videos, newspaper, and radio ads. We have also provided used oil/filter recycling containers to the citizen for safe transportation of used motor oil. ANALYSIS There are five State certified drop off sites within the City limits of Rancho Cucamonga. A certified drop off site or a curbside used oil collection program is a mandatory part of the Waste Oil Block Grant Program. Without at least one of the preceding items, the City is not eligible for grant funds. PROGRAM ANALYSIS The following are the programs staff will propose to the CIWMB for use of the block grant funds: · Continue funding the Used Oil Recycling portion of the operation of the HHW facility. · Continue television ads on local cable company. · Public education in local high schools science and auto shop classrooms. · Distribute a Do It Yourself Used Oil Recycling Kit at the HHW Facility, Car Shows and community events. · Filter Recycling program for selected Certified Used Oil Collection Centers Staff is recommending that Council approve the attached resolution in order to complete the application package. Respe fully ~ Wdliam J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO/bz Attachment 2./ RESOLUTION NO. n n- n,~ ~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE USED OIL RECYCLING FUND UNDER THE USED OIL RECYCLING ENHANCEMENT ACT WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Oil Recycling Enhancement Act that provides funds to cities and counties for establishing and maintaining local used oil collection programs that encourage recycling or appropriate disposal of used oil; and WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Board (Board) has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary procedures governing application by cities and counties under the program; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Integrated Waste Management Board require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of application before submission of said application to the State; and WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into an agreement with the State of California for the development of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: Authorize the submittal of an application to the California Integrated Waste Management Board for a 2000~2003 Used Oil Recycling Block Grant; and The City Engineer, or a designee is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga all necessary applications, contracts, payment requests, agreements and amendments hereto for the purposes of securing grant funds and to implement and carry out the purposes specified in the grant application. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 1, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council, Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager Diane Young, Records Coordinator ~ Destruction of City Records RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City' s Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The records in the attached destruction requests have met their required retention as listed in the City's Records Retention Schedule, and are due for final disposition. The records have been reviewed and approved for destruction by the Department representative, the Department Head and the City Attorney. DMY (Attachments as noted) RESOLUTION NO. 00- ~:)3 ~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City records of the Administration Department have been retained in compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local statutes; and WHEREAS, said City records have met their useful life and are no longer required for public or private purposes: WHEREAS, destruction of said records is necessary to conserve storage space, increase staff productivity, and maintain conformance with the City's Records Management Policy; and WHEREAS, said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto have been approved for destruction by the City Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION '1: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Resolution No. 00-*** Page 2 SECTION 2: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1st day of March, 2000 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 1 st day of March, 2000. Executed this 2nd day of March, 2000, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Administration Requestor: Diane O'Neal I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have been stored in the Administration Department and are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Record Title Code from Records Retention Schedule when applicable) Dept 4122 / Record Title 1020. l - Admin Chron Files (Mist. Correspondence re: Commission Vacancies) (Approx. 250 pages) Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) January, 1986 - December, 1988 ate City Attorney Approval (if required) Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 1, 2000 Mayor, Members of the City Council and Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Dawn Haddon, Jr. Buyer AUTHORIZATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT PURCHASE OF FLEET VEHICLES FROM VARIOUS DEALERSHIPS LOCATED WITHIN CALIFORNIA, SELECTED THROUGH REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL IN THE AMOUNT OF $630,335.08 FUNDED FROM FUND 72-4225-7045 AND $47,900.00 FROM FUND 1-4647-7045, 40, 41, 43, 45, 46, 4130-7045. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Couuci l authorize the replacement purchase of fleet vehicles from various dealerships located within California, selected through Request for Proposal in the amount of $630,335.08 funded from account 72-4225-7045 and $47,900.00 from fimds 1-4647- 7045, 40, 41, 43, 45, 46, 4130-7045. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS City Council approved the purchase of replacement vehicles as identified in tbe fiscal year 1999/2000 budget document under accotmt 72-4225-7045 and various LMD funds listed above. Maintenance provided specifications to Purchasing for all replacement/new vehicles. Pnrchasing prepared two Requests for Proposal. RFQ packets were advertised, ~nailed out and posted to the City's Website. Twenty-one packets were mailed out to various dealerships. Nine (9) responded to the Requests for Proposal. After analysis of the competitive price proposals, the most responsive and responsible vendors xvere selected. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence 1. Temple Administrative Services Director LIT:dkh 27 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENCINEEI~INC DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 1, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $118,310.84, ($107,555.31 plus 10% contingency) for the construction of the Beryl Street Rehabilitation, from Base Line to Cielito Street, to the apparent low bidder, Laird Construction Co., Inc., to be funded from Measure I Fund account 32-4637-9518. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for the Beryl Street Rehabilitation from Base Line to Cielito Street, to the apparent low bidder~ Laird Construction Co., Inc., to be funded from Measure I Fund account 32-4637-9518. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on January 18, 2000, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $143,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and found all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. City Engineer WJO:CH:dbm Attachment CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR BERYL STREET REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE TO CIEUTO STREET Bids Opened on January 18, 2000 Item Item Unit of No, Descdpuon Measure I Cleadng and Grubbing SF 2 Undassi~ed Excavation CY 3 Relocate/Replace Existing Mail BOX EA 4 Crushed Aggregate Base TONS 8 ASphalt Concrete Paving TONS 6 0.10' Cold Plane SY I Adj Manhole Cover & Frame to Finish Grade EA 8 Adj Water Vlve BOX & Cover to Finish Grade EA 9 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix TONS 10 8" Curb & 24" Gutter (A3-8) LF 11 Access Ramp EA · 12 Install Traffic LOOps EA · 13 Traffic Control LS 14 Traffic Striping, Signing, Markings & Markers LS Engineer's Estimate = $143.000 Lalrd ConstrucUon EsUmated Total QuanUty Unit Pdce BId Unit Price 25518 $0.15 $3,827.70 $0.30 461 $20.00 $9,220.00 $40.00 4 $150.00 $600.00 $100.00 616 $10.00 $6,160.00 $10.00 440 $27.50 $12,100.00 $30.00 5147 $1.25 $6,433.75 $1.30 2 $750.00 $1,500.00 $200.00 3 $50.00 $150.00 $25.00 534 $70.00 $37,380.00 $80.00 389 $20.00 $7,780.00 $13.00 4 $1,475.00 $5,900.00 $700.00 3 $375.00 $1,125.00 $300.00 I $12,878.86 $12,878.86 $1,000.00 I $2.500.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 Gentry Broffiers Total Bid $7,655.40 $18,440.00 $400.00 $6,160.00 $13,200.00 $6,691.10 $400.00 $75.00 $42,720.00 $5,057.00 $2,800.00 $900.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 ITOTAL: $107,555.31 ITOTAL: $108,498.50 CITY OF HANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR BERYL STREET REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE TO CIELITO STREET Bids Opened on January 18, 2000 Item item Unit of No. DescdpUon Measure I Cleadng and Grubbing SF 2 Unclassified Excavation CY 3 Relocate/Replace Existing Mail Box EA 4 Crushed Aggregate Base TONS 5 Asphalt Concrete Paving TONS 6 0.10' Cold Plane SY 7 Adj Manhole Cover & Frame to Finish Grade EA 8 Adj Water Vlve BOX & Cover to Finish Grade EA 9 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix TONS 10 8" Curb & 24" Gutter (A3-8) LF 11 Access Ramp EA 12 Install Traffic LOOps EA 13 Traffic Control LS 14 Traffic Striping, Signing, Markings & Markers LS Engineers Estimate = $143,000 All American Asphalt EsUmated Total Quantity Unit Pdce BId 25518 $0.61 $15,565.98 461 $17.90 $8,251.90 4 $550+00 $2,200.00 616 $25.70 $15,831.20 440 $39.60 $17,424.00 5147 $0.64 $3,294.08 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 3 $500.00 $1,500.00 534 $49.00 $26,166.00 389 $12.60 $4,901.40 4 $960.00 $3,840.00 3 $500.00 $1,500.00 1 $6.500.00 $6,500.00 1 $2.400.00 $2,400.00 Vance CorporaUon Total Unit Price Bid $0.17 $4,338.06 $16.50 $7,606.50 $308.00 $1,232.00 $14.15 $8,716.40 $36.80 $16,192.00 $1.94 $9,985.18 $518.00 $1,036.00 $51.00 $153.00 $99.00 552,866.00 $16.40 $6,379.60 $950.00 $3,800.00 $328.00 $984.00 $7,350.00 $7,350.00 $2,450.00 $2,450.00 ITOTAL: $110,374.56 iTOTAL: $123,088.74 I RANCHO CUCAMONGA UPLAND\ t __-- ~ILSE N AVE __~_ ~]gAN'~AN ST W !Project Site IIGHLANI kVE SUMMIT La )~NSF RR ~ IIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII HIIIIIII '9 NA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BERYL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM CIELITO STREET TO lgTH STREET LOCATION MAP N,T.S, ENG CHO CUCAMONGA INEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SiJ]~F_~CIF: March 1, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Approval to award and execution of Professional Services Agreement to Park Specialties, of Fallbrook, California, for the installation of poured in place rubber playground surfacing at Etiwanda Creek Park playground, in the amount of $84,495.00 ($76,814.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Fund 20, Account Number 20-4532-9912 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize execution of a Professional Services Agreement to Park Specialties, of Fallbrook, California, for the installation of poured in place rubber playground surfacing at Etiwanda Creek Park playground for an amount of $84,495 ($76,814.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Fund 20, Account Number 20-4532-9912. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS A Request for Proposal (RFP 99~00-009) was issued and responded to by Micon Construction, T.J. Construction, and Park Specialties. Staff has reviewed the documents and found Park Specialties to be the lowest responsive bidder. In prior years, Santa Ana winds have wreaked havoc with the playground sand at Etiwanda Creek Park. Not only do the winds deposit copious amounts of debris in the sand; the stronger winds have completely emptied the playground of sand twice, along with numerous partial emptying. In shod, the management of a safe and consistent sand surface for children to play on is expensive and difficult. To cure the problem, this budgeted project will remove approximately 90 percent of the sand and replace it with the same rubberized surfacing now being installed in playgrounds Citywide as part of the ADA compliance upgrades. The remaining 10% will remain for children to play. ,3/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ETIWANDA CREEK PARK March 1,2000 Page 2 William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JB:dlw Attachment Micon Construction $47,852' *Bid rejected-not complete INSTALLATION OF POURED IN PLACE RUBBER PLAYGROUND SURFACING AT ETIWANDA CREEK PARK PLAYGROUND BID SUMMARY / RFP 99~00-009 / FEBRUARY 2000 Park Specialties T.J. Construction $76,813.93 $77,075 APPARENT LOW FULL SERVICE PROPOSAL--PARK SPECIALTIES TH E C ITY O F RANC~O CUCAMONG~ DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: March 1, 2000 Mayor and City Councilmembers Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director Jan Reynolds, Redevelopment Analyst CONSIDERATION OF AN AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ESTABLISHING FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION IN THE FOOTHILL-HERMOSA STORM DRAIN PROJECT. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement establishing financial participation in the Foothill-Hermosa Storm drain project. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Foothill-Hermosa Storm Drain project is a joint effort between the City and Redevelopment Agency of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino. The project consists of construction of a storm drain system within Foothill Boulevard from Deer Creek Channel to Hermosa Avenue and within Hermosa Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to the Alta Loma Storm Drain near 19th Street (Exhibit "A"). As shown on Exhibit "B" the project targets a major water-carrying street in the City, which during heavy storms is impassible and presents a significant flooding risk to surrounding residences and businesses. Due to the significance of the storm drain, the project has earned a second priority ranking under San Bernardino County Flood Control District's Project Point Formula. This provides future funding from the District's annual Zone 1 construction budget, with a shared 50/50 financial participation by the City/Agency and the County. In anticipation of the project, the Redevelopment Agency provided the City/Agency share of the funding through the sale of Tax Allocation Bonds in 1994. However, as the next priority Zone 1 project, following completion of Upland's SUSI project, County funds are not expected to be available until the fiscal year 2001/2002. In light of the Redevelopment Agency's desire to reduce flooding risks and potential damage to properties, staff was directed to pursue an agreement with San Bernardino County Flood Control to expedite construction of the project. The Agency directed staff to prepare a financing proposal for consideration by the Flood Control District Board that could accomplish construction of the project in advance of the District's anticipated funding. To accelerate construction, the Redevelopment Agency agreed to provide a mechanism to allow construction of the first phase of the project without an initial cash investment from the District. As a result, the Agency approved in the 1999-00 fiscal year budget an appropriation from economic development reserves in an amount equal to the District's fair share of Phase I construction, estimated at $2.6 Million. Following Agency direction, staff prepared a financing plan that provided Agency funds to complete Phase I construction of the project in advance of Zone I funding, and established financial participation in all phases of the project. Additionally, staff identified an option for the County's consideration regarding the Church Street basin, approximately 14.8 acres located at the southwest corner of Haven and Church (Exhibit "A"). Since construction of the Hermosa-Foothill Storm Drain will divert the majority of the flow from the basin, the property can be sold as surplus by the District. The Agency proposed utilizing excess soil from the storm drain construction and other City projects to fill the basin in order to create a developable property. The property would then be sold to the Agency as a credit toward the District's fair share contribution. This would allow the Agency to market the property as a viable development project at its highest and best use. Proceeds from the Agency sale of the property would reimburse the economic development reserve funds used as the District's advance. The option was conceptually approved by the Zone 1 Committee, and has been included in the proposed agreement. In the event that the County and Agency do not agree on the value of the Church Street Basin property, the District will pay its share of the total project costs to the Agency on an annual basis, as funds from Zone I become available. If the Church Street Basin property is sold to a third party prior to construction of all phases of the project, the District has agreed to contribute proceeds from the sale to cover any shortfall in the District's share of the Hermosa Storm Drain project. The proposed Agreement permits construction of Phase I of the project, which begins at the Deer Creek Channel south of Foothill Boulevard, west on Foothill Boulevard to Hermosa and north on Hermosa to the connection of the existing Church Street Storm Drain. The Agreement additionally establishes the terms of funding, payment and -2- reimbursement for construction of the entire project. The scope of the Agreement is substantially as follows: · Agency/City and District to share 50% of total mainline storm drain project costs; · Agency to provide funds necessary to complete Phase I, in advance of District's Zone I funding availability. · Provides an option to accelerate District's contribution by declaring existing District- owned Church Street Basin property surplus, and selling to Agency. · Establishes City as lead agency for all stages of the project. Approval of this Agreement creates the mechanism to accelerate construction of this important storm drain facility, thus reducing flood risks and damage to surrounding properties. Phase I construction of the project will allow the City to proceed with much needed improvements to the intersection of Foothill and Hermosa, including street widening, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and improved grade transition. Completion of this phase of the project will also allow the City to proceed with Lower Hermosa Storm Drain improvements south of Foothill Boulevard. Once the project is complete, the City will submit an application to FEMA to have the flood zone designation removed from the affected properties, resulting in an insurance cost savings for property owners. Approvals for construction of the project have been obtained from all jurisdictional agencies, including the Army Corp of Engineers, CALTRANS, County of San Bernardino and City of Rancho Cucamonga. The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors will consider approval of the financial participation agreement at their meeting of March 7, 2000. Pending approval of the agreement by all parties, the City's Engineering Division anticipates award of the construction bid to occur no later than April 5, 2000. Respecfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Director Exhibit "A" - Project Location Map Exhibit "B" -March 1, 1991 Photographs -3- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXHIBIT - A H hland Ave. LEGEND N Future Phase Major streets Base Lind Rd. Church St. Phase 1 Foothill Blvd. Arrow Rt. 19th St. Future Phase \ Church Basin 0.3 0 0.3 0.6 Mil, s? Rancho city Cucamonga of Staff Report DATE: March 1, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Lack lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: AGREEMENT WITH LSA ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-06, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-06, PARCEL MAP 15427, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-63. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council, through minute action, authorize the Mayor to execute the Professional Services Agreement awarding the contract to LSA Associates, Inc. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS. The applicant, Hall & Foreman, Inc., submitted a General Plan Amendment, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment, Development District Amendment, Parcel Map, and Conditional Use Permit applications for a new retail commercial center. The Project site is located at the Southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, within an approximately 17.8 acre site (See Exhibit A). The proposed retail commercial area is 158,455 square feet in size with a future expansion area of 76,818. The total retail commercial area of the big box anchor store is 235,273 square feet. On May 14, 1997, the Planning Commission approved a master plan for a commercial center within half of the project site (8.9 acres). The commercial center consisted of 5 freestanding buildings along Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue and a large big box store, totaling 74,478 square feet in size. The developer wants to modify the approved master plan. The developer proposes to incorporate a 7.1-acre site located on the south side of the project site. The total area for the commercial center would be 17.8 acres in size. Further, the developer proposes to replace the previously approved anchor retail store with a 235,273 square foot big box retail store. The developer, based on the proposed modifications and the size of the retail center, recommended and staff concurred that an EIR should be prepared for the project. The developer submitted to the City a $10,000 good faith deposit to initiate the selection process for an environmental consultant. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PROFESSINAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. March 1, 2000 Page 2 Staff began the selection process by distributing a Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposal (RFQ/RFP) to several environmental consulting firms in Southern California, from which three responded. Based on a review of their proposal for Scope of ServicesNVork with cost estimates and an interview with the representatives of the tree firms on February 9, 2000, staff determined that LSA Associates, Inc. best matches the City needs for the project. The contract is for $140,000 with a 5 percent contingency. City Planner BB:SS\Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" Proposed Master Plan Exhibit "B" Previously approved Master Plan Exhibit "C" - Request For Proposal/Qualifications ("RFP/RFQ") Exhibit "D" Scope of Services Professional Services Agreement RANCHO CUCAMONGA RETAIL CENTER SITE PLAN !~,)thdl boulevord ml ;: i::' "li:::i .~ .... IF:: .~ .... : .... EL""'-":/ CONCEPTUAL M<~s-t'..r P/,, I~'~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL/QUALIFICATIONS ("RFP/RFQ") FOR A RETAIL COMMERCIAL CENTER GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTRODUCTION The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Community Development Department, hereafter, referred to as the "City," is seeking proposals from interested and qualified consultants and firms to prepare a Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a new retail commercial center, hereinafter referred to as the "Project." The Project site is located at the Southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, within an approximately 17.8 acre site. The proposed retail commercial area is 158,455 square feet in size with a future expansion area of 76,818. The total retail commercial area is 235,273 square feet. The implementation of the Project requires the approval of a General Plan Amendment, Development District Amendment, Foothill Specific Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and a Parcel Map. REQUIREMENTS, SCOPE OF WORK AND PRODUCTS All proposals must include a detailed scope of work, a timetable, and the necessary tasks envisioned to complete the work. Proposals must be outlined in a clear and logical format. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. Tasks To Be Completed: Project management: The completion of the scope of services may require the formation of a project team under the direction of a single project manager. Define the analysis needed to provide an understanding of the physical impacts and implications of various approaches implementing the project and to formulate consensus that meets community needs. Prepare a thorough and logically organized written assessment of impacts that will withstand public and agency scrutiny, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including, but not limited to, the following activities: · Prepare and distribute a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the City. · Prepare and 'di~ribute the draft EIR for review and comments. · Prepare responses to comments received from the NOP and the draft EIR. EXHIBIT "C" . REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL/QUALIFICATIONS SWC VINEYARD AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD January 6, 2000 Page 2 Provide a screen check draft EIR for staff review, and incorporate any staff comments to the draft EIR. Undertake a public involvement process through a minimum of one neighborhood meeting or the EIR scoping process to identify community concerns and needs relative to the General Plan, Development District and Foothill Specific Plan Amendments and the Project in general. Prepare the final EIR and distribute for review. The EIR shall include the draft EIR, technical appendices, letters of comments and responses, mitigation and monitoring programs, facts and findings, statement of overriding considerations, and the City Council resolution certifying the document and approving the land use amendments. Work with relevant responsible agencies to identify technical issues, focusing on air quality, noise, biological resources, cultural resources, drainage, and traffic impacts, which includes but is not limited to early consultation meeting with representatives from California Department of Fish and Game, US Fish and Wildlife Services, San Bernardino County Flood Control, and Caltrans. Work constructively with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the applicant project team to minimize project environmental impacts while attaining the Project objectives. Provide in house review of all products by a technical editor and a principal prior to submittal to the city according to the City approved Consultant's (Proposer) Quality control process. Serve as an extension of City staff to ensure that all City and CEQA procedural and notification requirements are met. 9. Presentations to City staff, Commissions, and City Council. 10. Research records to obtain all plans, maps or other information, which are pertinent and useful to the preparation of the project report. 11. All products developed as a result of this project become property of the City. 12. Prepare a Financial/Fiscal Report. The Financial/Fiscal Report shall use the most recent Fiscal Analysis prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in conjunction with the General Plan Update. The Financial/Fiscal Report must analyze the impact of the retail center on small local retail business. It must also analyze the potential impacts of changing the land use designation from Residential to Commercial. EXHIBIT "C" . REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL/QUALIFICATIONS SWC VINEYARD AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD January 6, 2000 Page 3 B. Progress Meetings and Public Meetings: Members of the consultant team are to be available to meet with the City's team as needed to discuss the status of the project. Minutes of the progress meeting shall be provided to the City by the consultant. Members of the consultant team are to attend Planning Commission and City Council public hearings for review and approval of the Project. C. Copies: 1. 15 sets of plans and reports for staff review 2. 25 sets of plans and reports for Planning Commission and Council review 3. 5 sets of the approved full size sets of plans. and one full size set of reproducible master; 5 sets of 8 ~ by 11 format and one set of reproducible master. SCHEDULE/PROPOSAL TIME LINE The City expects the contract for services to begin mid February and conclude before the end of December. The critical dates are as follows: · Deadline for receipt of RFOJRFP: · Interview Consultants: · Selection of Consultant: · City Council confirmation of the consultant: · Consultant Distributes NOP · Consultant prepares and submits screen check draft EIR for City's review: · Consultant prepares and distributes draft EIR for 45-day public comment period: · Consultant Prepares responses to draft EIR: · Consultant prepares screen check final EIR for City's review: · Consultant attends Planning Commission hearing(s) on EIR: · Consultant attends City Council public · Hearing(s) on EIR: 5:00 p.m. January 27, 2000 Early February One week after interviews Early March 2000 Mid- to Late March 2000 Mid to Late May 2000 Early June 2000 Within two weeks after received Late June to Early July 2000 Mid July Early August 2000 Early September 2000 PROPOSALCONTENTS A. Statement of familiarity with the project area. B. Statement of ability to commit to the scope of work and the time table. EXHIBIT "C". REQUEST FOR PROPOSAUQUALIFICATIONS SWC VINEYARD AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Janua~ 6,2000 Page 4 : C. Statement and qualifications of the firm and the personnel available to work on the project. D. Statement of technical proposals identifying the method of approach, the framework and the work program, etc, E. A detailed scope of work including itemized costs of graphics and report preparation. F. Detailed plan of activities (including expected date for reaching major milestones). G, Total cost of the project, fee schedule, etc. (please include this information in a sealed envelope). H. Describe the structure of your firm, number of employees, and office location(s). SELECTION CRITERIA The selection of a consultant for this project will be based on the following factors: A. Initial Review - All proposals will be initially evaluated to determine if they meet the following minimum requirements: a, The proposal must be complete, in the required format, and be in compliance with all the requirements of this RFP/RFQ. B. Professional qualifications and capability of the consultant team. C. Ability of the consultant firm to commit the personnel and time necessary to complete the project in a timely manner. D. Experience with similar types of projects. E. Demonstration of a clear understanding of the project and the work to be performed. F. Reasonable cost. CONTRACT AWARD Contract will be awarded based on a competitive selection of proposals received. The contents of the proposal of the successful consultant (Proposer) will become contractual obligations and failure to accept these obligations in a contractual agreement may result in cancellation of the award. FINAL APPROVAL Any contract resulting from this RFP/RFQ will be awarded by final approval of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council, DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION The City will not consider proposals from consultant firms that do not contain all the items outline above. Submit five copies of the RFP/RFQ to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division by 5:00 p.m. January 27, 2000, at the following address. A postmark date of a faxed proposal will not be accepted. EXHIBIT"C". REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL/QUALIFICATIONS SWC VINEYARD AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Janua~ 6,2000 Page 5 Attention: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 EXHIBIT"C". City of Ranclio Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR TABLE OF CONIENT$ fn troduction project Understanding .......................... 1 LSA's Role ................................... 1 The Team .................................... 1 Scope o/Work Task 1.0: Project Initiation ..................... 4 Task 2.0: Initial Study and Notice of Preparation . ,. 4 Task 3.0: Screencheck Drag EIR ............... 5 Task4.0: Drag EIR ........................ 12 Task 5.0: Final EIR ........................ 12 Task 6.0: Public Hearings ................... 13 Task7.0:projectManagemenU'Administration... 13 Product Matrix ............................ 14 LSAAssociates. Inc. -i- Sdledule and Project Managenlent Project Schedule ........] .................18 January 27, 2000 81t, 141B11""O" '/S CiOz of Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR INTRODUCTION Project Understanding The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seeking proposals from qualified environmental consulting firms to pre- pare an Environmental Impact Repod (EIR) for a retail commercial center located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. Implemen- tation of the project requires the approval of a.General Plan Amendment, Development District Amendment, Foothill Specific Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit, and a Parcel Map. The proposed project site consists of 17.8 acres. The proposed retail commercial area measures 158,455 square feet with an expansion of 76,818 square feet. Combined, the initial and expansion area will total 235,273 square feet of retail commercial space. The proposed project is located within the Foothill Specific Plan. LSA has a clear understanding of the issues facing the City and the applicant regarding the placement of a big-box retail land use in the City. Crucial issues will include traffic generation, noise from loading dock and parking lot activities on sensitive receptors such as residential land uses, air quality impacts both shod-term during construction and long-term vehicle emissions. The site will also need to be assessed for any impacts on biological or cultural resources. All of these issues were addressed in an EIR LSA recently completed for the City of Corona to assess the ira- pacts of building a "second" Walmad in the City. The public was concerned about increased noise from deliveries and vehicle traffic; traffic impacts in an area that is already congested and safety of school chil- dren form increased traffic; light and glare impacts on adjacent residences; air quality impacts; and non-en- vironmentally related issues such as low paying jobs (non-union wages), perceived increased crime from loitering teenagers, and the impact on existing retail businesses in the City. The City also required the developer to assess the fiscal impacts of the project on the City and what the retail drain would be. The analysis provided in the fiscal study provided information that was used in the EIR findings and statement of overriding considerations. The role of the environmental consultant will be to prepare an Initial Study and Notice of Preparation (NOP), an EIR and associated suppoding technical studies for air quality, noise, traffic, biological re- sources, and cultural resources. A separate finan- cial/fiscal analysis will be prepared as a pad of the EIR contract. LSA's Role LSA's role will be to prepare an EIR for the proposed project for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Prepara- tion of environmental documentation for the project will provide an objective analysis of the physical im- pacts of implementing the proposed retail commercial center. Therefore, our overall approach can be sum- marized as follows: Prepare a thorough and logically organized writ- ten assessment of impacts that will withstand public and agency scrutiny, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Underlake a public involvement process through a neighborhood or public scoping meeting and the EIR scoping process, to identify community concerns and needs relative to the General Plan, Specific Plan, or Development District amend- ments, define the analysis needed to provide an understanding of the physical impacts and impli- cations of various approaches implementing the aforementioned amendments, and to formulate a consensus which meets community needs. in addition to community input, we will work with relevant responsible agencies to identify technical issues, focusing on air quality, noise, biological resources, cultural resources, drainage, and traf- tic impacts. Work constructively with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the applicant's project team to minimize project environmental impacts while at- taining project objectives. Provide in-house review of all products by a tech- nical editor and a Principal prior to submittal to the City, according to the LSA Quality Control Hand- book. Serve as an extension of City staff to ensure that all City and CEQA procedural and notification re- quirements are met. LSA Associates, lnc -1- January 27, 2000 qq City of Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR LSA is an employee owned community planning, envi- ronmental, and transportation planning organization with offices in Riverside, Irvine, Point Richmond, Berkeley, and Rocklin, California. Since its rounding in 1976, LSA has advanced from a small firm of a few in-house specialists to a full service consulting firm with a staff of 140 full-time employees, including plan- ners and engineers with expertise in land use, environmental, and transportation projects; civil and traffic engineers; air quality, acoustical and hydrology specialists; archaeologists, cultural historians, paleon- tologists; vegetation and wildlife management special- ists; and professional foresters. The employee owned nalure of the firm guarantees that each employee- owner sees the direct results of his or her efforts by contributing to the success of LSA. We pride our- selves on our ability to produce high quality work for difficult projects under tight deadlines. LSA is recognized as an innovator in the field of envi- tonmenial assessments, and has developed a repu- tation among clients and professional peers as being thorough, innovative, and objective. LSA has pre- pared hundreds of environmental documents for a variety of public and private projects, including gen- eral plan amendments and community or specific plans. LSA has considerable experience dealing with the environmental issues associated with "big box" retail development. We are thoroughly familiar with - CEQA, and have developed effective mitigation moni- toring programs pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. One of our greatest strengths is developing consensus among varied interests, so that projects such as the proposed retail commercial cen- tel can move beyond initial planning into adoption and implementation. Lloyd Zola, Principal in Charge, will be responsible for overall managemenl of the EIR, as well as inter- face with the City. Mr. Zola will provide his special expedise in site planning for special use projects, public policy, and resolution of complex issues. An accomplished researcher and technical writer, Mr. Zola has been called before the United States Supreme Court as an expert witness in planning. Mr. Zola has managed environmental analysis for large- scale commercial/industrial, recreation, and public works projects, including the Ontario Mills (1.9 million square feet discount mall in Ontario), the Rolling Ridge Marketplace, a 776,000-square-foot multi-ten- ant retail project (including Costco) in the City of Chino Hills, and the California Speedway near Fontana. Mr. Zola is the Principal in-Charge of LSA's LSA Associates, Inc. Riverside office. Lynn Calvert-Hayes, AICP, Task Manager, EIR, will be responsible for preparation of the EIR, coordi- nation of the environmental evaluation within the EIR, and the community participation program including public hearings. Ms. Calvert-Hayes has extensive experience in the preparation of EIRs and other re- lated environmental evaluations. She has acted as project manager on EIRs prepared for the Citrus Vii- lage II development (Walmart) in Corona, and has managed EIRs prepared for the Edison Corridor and Victoria Arbors Village for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. As the project manager for the award winning City of Indio General Plan EIR, she pioneered a system to evaluate the environmental impacts of a general plan and provide a mechanism for assuring the mitigation provided in the General Plan EIR is ira- plemented. Indio's General Plan EIR won both the American Planning Association (APA) Outstanding Comprehensive Planning Document and the Associa- lion of Environmental Professionals (AEP) Outstand- ing Environmental Resource Document. She has conducted numerous public scoping meetings and is familiar with the scoping meeting protocol. Ms. Calvert-Hayes is very active in the environmental pro- lession and is past Executive Vice President of the Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP). Ms. Calvert-Hayes is an Associate with LSA's River- side office. M. Kevin Fincher, Task Manager, Tra.~ic Analysis, has successfully managed traffic impact analyses for development projects in highly urbanized areas in northern and southern California. Mr. Fincher has extensive experience with preparation of traffic impact analyses pursuant to the requirements of the San Bemardino County CMP. In this capacity, he has ex- tensive experience using forecast traffic model data obtained from both SCAG and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and coordinating with City staff to de- velop appropriate data for complex planning projects. Mr. Fincher also has extensive experience in the use of traffic modeling data to prepare comprehensive areawide circulation studies for entire cities, as large- scale developments. Mr. Fincher is an Associate with LSA's Riverside office. Tony-Chen Chung, Ph.D., INCE Bd Cert., Task Manager, Air Quality and Noise, will prepare the technical air quality analyses. Dr. Chung has over 13 years of experience in environmental studies, special- izing in air quality impact analysis. Dr. Chung has per- formed more than 100 air quality and 300 noise stud- ies for projects such as transportation facilities, land- -2- ]anua7 27. 2000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR fills, office buildings, and ocean bay enhance- mentJsediment management projects. Having pre- pared Air Quality and Noise Studies for a number of "big box" retail projects, Dr. Chung is thoroughly fa- miliar with the air quality and noise issues related to development of large retail projects. Dr. Chung is an Associate with LSA's Irvine office. Shant Agajanian, Ph.D., Financial/Fiscal Study, will be responsible for the preparation of the Finan- cial/Fiscal Study. Dr. Agajanian, Principal at Agajanian & Associates, eamed his doctorate degree in Urban and Regional Planning at the University of Wisconsin. He padicipates in both the professional and academic sectors. Professionally, Dr. Agajanian authored the fiscal analysis for the Victoria Arbors Village EIR, prepared for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. LSA was the environmental consultant that prepared the EIR for Victoria Arbors Village for the City, Academically, he continues to publish his research, lecture, review scholarly papers for refereed journals, and review books for academic journals, Dr, Agajanian participates in activities for the Urban Land Institute, American Planning Association, and related professional organizations. In addition, he has served as an exped witness for real estate economic topics, served on blue ribbon commissions reviewing eco- nomic and land planning projects, and participated on panels dealing with urban land economics. Detailed resumes for each team member are provided in Appendix A. Therefore, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be pro- vided with the following: An exceptional proficiency in the formulation of environmental documentation for commercial centers; Staff members who have direct experience work- ing with the City of Rancho Cucamonga; Understanding of the specific issues and impacts associated with "big box" retail development; Staff members who have direct experience with community participation related to EIRs, and have demonstrated a singular ability to find community consensus with environmental issues; An innovative approach to alternatives which are technically sound and resolve environmental is- sues in a manner consistent with the project's objectives and goals; Experience to prepare an EIR that is legally sound; and The ability. drive, and enthusiasm that is needed to complete the EIR project on time and within budget. LSA Associates, Inc. -3- January 2 L 2000 Ci~ of Rancho Cuca~nonga Retail Commercial Center EIR SCOPE OF WORK Task 1.0: Project Initiation The most important part of any consultant project is the manner in which the consultant team gets started. In order to ensure the orderly flow of project efforts, a number of organizational tasks will be un- dertaken at the outset of the work effort. 1.1 Kick-off Meeting With City Staff A project kick-off meeting with City staff will be con- ducted after the approval of the environmental con- sultant selection by City Council to: establish a mutual understanding of the EIR pro- gram objectives and key issues, explore possible community concerns regarding the retail center, and discuss City expectations for the consul- tanrs work effort; identity City department and governmental agen- cies; and business, environmental, and service organizations and contact persons; and other individuals whose input will be vital to the suc- cessful completion of the EIR program; refine the scope of work to be performed for the EIR and related technical studies; · .' define protocols for requesting information of City staff and the applicant's team; review the community participation program and the schedule for the public scoping meeting or neighborhood meeting. locations, times, docu- mentation, and notification details for meetings; refine project timing. establish protocols for prod- uct review and coordination with the City and define project milestones and decision points; and obtain relevant plans, reports, ordinances, and studies applicable to the project. Prior to the kick-off meeting, LSA will identity its doc- ument and information needs to assist City staff in accumulating the background information that are necessary to initiate the program. Output: Clear project objectives, a mutual under- standing of the process and protocols that will be followed, and an identification of key stakeholders in the program. LSA Associates, Inc. - ' -4- Task 2.0: Initial Study and Notice of Preparation A Notice of Preparation to prepare an EIR has a criti- cal objective of providing a means by which the 9en- eral public and responsible agencies can participate in the environmental process by providin9 written comment in the public record as to what issues they believe should be addressed in the EIR, This task includes conducting a neighborhood or public scoping meeting to discuss and receive verbal and written input on the issues that should be ad- dressed in the EIR and will also serve to identity con- troversial issues that may be raised by the commu- 2.1 Initial Study/Notice o/Preparation LSA will prepare a draft Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the proposed project using standard City forms. We intend on preparing an Initial Study Part I and II (IS) to circulate with the NOP. The NOP will include a brief description of the project, and will identity the process for completing the EIR. It is also our intent to include the location, time, and date of the neigh- bothodd or public scoping meeting in the NOP (if available). This will save costs by doing away with a separate mailing to announce the meeting. The Initial Study will describe expected issues and analysis to be provided in the EIR and the reasons for determining that certain environmental effects would not be significant. The NOP will indicate that the EIR is in preparation, and will request guidance from each agency regarding the scope and content of the environmental information to be included in the EIR. The draft NOP will be submitted to the City for review and approval before distribution. Using the City's NOP distribution list, Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies (if any), and other interested parties that should receive the NOP will be identified. LSA will distribute and mail the required copies of the IS/NOP. Output: Prepare mailing list. Mail and distribute 25 copies of the IS/NOP for public review. One camera ready copy will be provided to the City for its files. ]anuaSy 27, 2000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR 2.2 Neighborhood or Public Scoping Meeting LSA will attend one neighborhood or public scoping meeting during the 30-day public review period on the NOP. The purpose of this meeting will be to pro- vide the public the opportunity to have input into the proposed content of the EIR. The meeting will also provide both LSA and the City the opportunity to ex- plain the proposed project and answer questions if necessary. Output: Attend one neighborhood or public scoping meeting to receive public input as to the content of the EIR. Task 3. O: Screencheck Draft EIR In this task, LSA will prepare appropriate environ- mental documentation pursuant to current CEQA requirements and the City's administrative guidelines for implementing CEQA. Key inputs to the EIR pro- cess will be generated during earlier portions of the work program, including responses received on the NOP and comments received at the neighborhood or public scoping meeting. 3.1 Project Description LSA will prepare a draft project description describ- ing the preferred alternative to be evaluated in the EIR. In addition, a detailed narrative of the project description will discuss project objectives, geograph- ical setting, and related projects. Each of the require- ments in CEQA for an EIR project description will be included in this section. which will be provided to City staff for review pdor to completion of the Screencheck Draft EIR. Output: Draft project description for City review prior to substantial investment of time and project cost in analyzing the proposed pro- ject. 3.2 EIR Technical Studies Although the precise nature of technical studies will be determined following completion of the scoping process, we anticipate that the studies described in this task are a fair representation of the work effort required for the EIR. For the topics listed below, a technical repod, which will be summarized in the EIR text, will be prepared and provided in its entirety in the EIR appendices. The draft studies will be LSA Associates, -5- submitted for review as part of the Screencheck Draft EIR prepared in Subtask 3.3 Traffic. The traffic and circulation analysis for the proposed project will be prepared to address existing traffic conditions, future traffic forecasts. and project related impacts for submittal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bemardino Associated Governments (SANBAG, the County's CMP agency). The analysis will be prepared consistent with the Guidelines for CMP Traffic Impact Analysis Reports in San Bernardino County (Appendix C of the CMP). This document explicitly describes the requirements for preparation and submittal of a site impact analy- sis, and will be followed precisely during the prepara- tion of the project analysis. Based on the CMP guidelines, traffic conditions will be examined for five analysis scenarios: "Existing" conditions Opening day without project Opening day with project Year 2020 without project Year 2020 with project It should be noted that this scope of work assumes the availability of all necessary forecast traffic fore- casts for the roadways in the vicinity of the project site. Existing p.m. peak period intersection turn vol- ume counts will be collected for all analysis intersec- tions (the CMP does not require a.m. peak hour anal- ysis for retail projects). Modeling efforts will be per- formed by the SCAG Inland Office using the Com- prehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) traffic model. Model results will be modified as necessary to pro- vide an accurate estimate of impacts related to the build out of the project site. Study Area Determination: To initiate the work, LSA will determine the study area to be analyzed, based on County CMP guidelines (80 one-way peak hour trips on arterials and 100 one-way peak hour trips on freeways), and will analyze CMP intersections facili- ties and intersections within this study area. Coordination nith AgenCy Staff. Pdor to preparation of the traffic impact analysis, LSA will consult with City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Works Department and Community Development Depadment staff to achieve the following: Obtain any existing traffic counts collected in the project area within the last year. ]anua~7 27, 2000 qf Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR Identity any non-CMP intersections the City would like included in the traffic impact analysis. Identity specific issues that City staff requests be addressed in the traffic impact analysis. In addition, LSA will meet with representatives of SANBAG to accomplish the following: Determine the appropdate study area bound- aries. Obtain existing traffic counts collected in the pro- ject area within the last year. Verity the acceptability of traffic analysis as- sumptions, such as trip distribution patterns, prior to completing the study. Identity specific issues that SANBAG requests be addressed in the traffic impact analysis. The availability of background traffic data will be re- viewed and assessed in consultation with agency staff. Based on the extent of the study area and availability of background data, modification of the scope of work may be necessary. In addition, this scope of work may need to be modified to reflect issues and concerns raised by agency staff. Data Collectian: The following data will be required to prepare the traffic analysis for the proposed project: · .. Existing Daily Tra. ff~c Counts for key roadways in the vicinity of the project site. Specific locations to be analyzed will be identified in consultation with agency staff. For purposes of this scope of work, it is assumed that all needed daily traffic counts will be available from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, SANBAG, Colttans, and/or current traffic impact analyses for other development in the vicinity of the project site. F_.risting Peak Period Intersection Counts will be ob- tained by LSA for the p.m. peak pedod for key intersections in the vicinity of the project site. Specific locations to be counted will be identified in consultation with agency staff, based on the results of the study area determination task. For purposes of this scope and budget estimate, it is anticipated that up to 25 intersections will be counted within the project study area. Year 2020 Daily and Peak Period Tral~c Volumes for the roadways in the vicinity of the project site will be collected from the SCAG Inland Office. LSA Associates, Inc. -6- Project Area Trip Distribution Patterns will be de- veloped from CTP model select zone assign- ment information obtained from the SCAG Inland Office. Other Engineering Studies. Detailed traffic engi- neering studies for any approved or committed projects in the vicinity of the proposed project will need to be collected so that roadway improve- merits may be incorporated in the project impact analysis, as appropriate. E.~'sting Tra.~c Conditions: Existing daily and p.m. peak hour traffic conditions and levels of service will be assessed for the freeways and arterial intersec- tions identified for examination. The fleeway main- line and arterial intersection levels of service will be calculated using appropriate Highway Capacity Man- ual (HCM} level of service analysis methodologies, as identified in the CMP guidelines. Background Traffic Conditions: Year 2020 background (without project) traffic conditions will be developed in consultation with SANBAG staff using the year 2020 forecast traffic information obtained from the SCAG Inland Office's CTP traffic model. The raw traffic model output will be refined for use in the traf- fic analysis according to methodologies appreved by SANBAG. Opening year (without project) volumes will be developed by interpolating between existing and year 2020 conditions. The resulting freeway and artedal intersection levels of service for both the opening day and year 2020 conditions will be calcu- lated using the HCM analysis methodologies. Project Trip Characteristics: The project tdp generation will be calculated using tdp rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Tdp Generation (6~' Edition), or other appropriate sources. Trip distribu- tion will be developed based on select zone assign- ment information obtained from the CTP model. Project Impact Assessment: The project trip generation will be added to both the opening year and year 2020 traffic base to determine the potential CMP circula- tion impacts associated with ultimate project devel- opment. For each scenario, arterial intersection and freeway levels of seNice will be determined using methodologies required in the CMP guidelines. Pro- ject impacts will be determined by the requirements of the CMP, and will be based on a comparison of the baseline plus project scenario with baseline traf- fic model runs (without the project). For the year 2020 scenario, the project's contribution to the total new traffic volumes will be determined using the CMP guidelines. January 27, 2000 of Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR Site Access Assessment: The operations of project ac- cess driveways onto Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue will be assessed to determine adequacy of design to accommodate forecasted demand. The assessment will also include an examination of pro- ject access driveways relative to other ddveways along Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue to insure that the locations of proposed driveways do not interfere with traffic flow at other non-project ac- cess locations. Based on the assessment of drive- way location and operations, recommendations will be made regarding signalization, modification of driveway geometrics, or teloration of driveways. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation measures will be identified to maintain CMP and City of Rancho Cucamonga standard levels of service. These miti- gation improvements will include intersection turn lanes, signalization, and segment lane additions. If project impacts are identified on a freeway segment, lane requirements to address the .level of service deficiencies will be examined. The levels of service with mitigation will be calculated and compared with the levels of service without mitigation. The SANBAG cost estimate listing will be used to determine order of magnitude cost estimates for rec- ommended circulation improvements. Based on the project's traffic contribution to roadways and intersec- tions requiring mitigation, the projecrs fair share con- tribution for mitigation costs will be identified. D;a~ Traffic Analysis Preparation and Submittal: LSA will prepare a draft traffic impact analysis report doc- umenting analysis methodologies, existing condi- tions, opening year and year 2020 baseline condi- lions, project impacts, mitigation measures, and the project contribution to mitigation measures. The draft traffic study will be submitted to the City for re- view. Traffic Analysis Roisions: Upon completion of the City's review of the traffic analysis, LSA will revise the traffic analysis for submittal to SANBAG for re- view. Final Traffic Analysis Preparation: Upon completion of SANBAG review of the traffic analysis, LSA will address any comments raised by SANBAG staff. The revises analysis will then be re-submitted to SANBAG for final review and approval. Air Quali(y. LSA will prepare a technical air quality analysis for inclusion in the EIR consistent with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook (April, 1993). All technical calculations wilt be provided as an appendix to the EIR. Background traffic volumes, project trip generation and distribution, and level of service calculations developed as part of the traf- ridcirculation analysis will be used in preparing this technical analysis. Additional information required from the City/applicant is further identified in the dis- cussion below. Baseline Conditions: Baseline and project setting me- teorological and air quality data will be collected from sources such as California Air Resources Board (CARB) air quality summaries, and climatological and air quality profile data from SCAQMD monitoring stations. Construction Emissions: Short-term construction re- lated impacts, such as fugitive dust due to earth moving and grading, and exhaust emissions associ- ated with on-site construction equipment and mate- rial hauling operations. will be evaluated commensu- rate with the level of detail available regarding con- struction activity and phases. Fugitive dust (PM~o) and construction vehicle emissions will be calculated using standard procedures and factors (per EPA AP- 42, CARB, and SCAQMD). The quantity of air pollut- ants will be estimated in terms of the calculated daily emissions in relation to the threshold emissions specified by the SCAQMD. Mitigation measures will be identified, where appropriate. Operational Emissions: Expected emissions attribut- able to project operation wilt be calculated using the latest version of the urban emissions model (URBEMIS 7G). The estimated air pollutant emis- sions will be compared to the significance thresholds specified by the SCAQMD for evaluation of potential impact. Assessment of the projecrs consistency with regional growth projections and air quality objectives will be conducted. Local Carbon Monoxide Emissions: The projected peak hour traffic rates and traffic movements at selected intersections and roadway segments will be obtained from the traffic study for prediction of local CO con- centrations at up to ten locations (five locations with the worst level of service and five locations with the highest with project traffic volumes). The locations will be selected in consultation with the City. The Caltrans EMFACTF, CALINE4 computer models, and the Caltrans Project Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol (December 1997) will be used to calculate the one- hour and eight-hour CO concentrations for roadway LSA Associates, Inc. -7- ]anuary 27, 2000 Ci,t-y of Rattcho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR traffic. Data available from the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook and the Caltrans 1997 CO Proto- col report will be used as a basis for traffic parameter inputs such as vehicle mix (i.e., percentage of heavy trucks, etc.), fraction of vehicles operating in the cold start mode, and representative vehicle travel speeds. Mitigation Measures: Feasible mitigation measures will be identified for all impacts considered to be sig- nificant. Effectiveness of the mitigation measures and their applicability will be discussed. Noise. LSA will prepare a technical noise analysis for inclusion directly into the EIR. A separate techni- cal noise report will not be prepared; however, tech- nical calculations will be provided as an appendix to the EIR. Background daily traffic volumes and pro- ject daily trip generation from the traffidcirculation analysis prepared LSA will be used in preparing this technical analysis. Additional data requirements are identified in the discussion below. The following items will be addressed in the noise study. Basdine Noise Conditions: Conduct a review of the City's General Plan Noise Element, Noise Ordinance, aerial photographs, and other relevant documents, including prior noise studies on and in the vicinity of the project to establish the regulatory framework for assessing noise impacts and assist in identifying ap- propriate sensitive receiver locations. A .survey of existing ambient noise levels will be con- ducted to establish the character of the noise envi- ronment at the identified sensitive receiver locations within and adjacent to the proposed facility. Noise measurements will be made at up to six locations. Observations of noise sources and other noise corre- lates will be noted during each measurement pedod. Constn~ction Noise: Short-term noise impacts due to construction will be evaluated based on an analysis in terms of range of maximum levels (Lmax) likely to occur at adjacent residential locations. Operation Noise: Noise levels will be estimated at sensitive receiver locations for the existing and fu- lure with and without the proposed project scenarios. The FHWA highway traffic noise model will be used to predict noise levels due to projected roadway traf- fic for the facility. Proprietary versions of the FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD- 77-104) will be used to directly calculate noise levels at identified receiver locations and specified dis- tances from the roadways. Noise levels will be esti- mated in terms of community noise exposure level LSA Associates, Inc. (CNEL) and compared to State and local standards. Project effects will be determined based on the increo ment of change from the future no build to build con- dillon. Traffic parameters such as peak hour traffic rates, average daily traffic rates, medium and heavy truck traffic rates, traffic distribution during the day, eve- ning, and nighttime periods, and associated vehicle speeds provided by the traffic study or the City will be utilized in the analysis. Noise associated with proposed on-site commercial uses, such as loading/unloading, and parking lot ve- hicle movement will be assessed at sensitive recap- tor locations adjacent to the project site. Noise Control Recominendations: Measures that mini- mize project noise impacts at identified noise sensi- tive receptors will be recommended as required. Biological Resources. The biological assessment will include a review of literature sources, a field survey of the project site, and preparation of a biological assessment report. The assessment will address biological resources of the site with an emphasis on sensitive animal and plant species and special habi- tats. LSA will identify potential impacts (if any) to sensitive resources and suggest mitigation measures for those impacts. A detailed literature review may identify sensitive resources which should be addressed in the biologi- cal assessment. Literature Search and Records Check: Prior to the field survey, we will review the information from previous studies in the project vicinity. We will review the Cali- fornia Natural Diversity Data Base for sensitive biological elements reported on the USGS 7.5' Oucamonga Peak and Guasti quads and surrounding quadrangles. FieM Surveys: An on-site survey will be conducted by LSA biologists familiar with the habitats and sensitive resources of the region, The survey will include the following: Delineating and mapping habitat types, A directed search for sensitive plant species, A focused survey for the California gnatcatcher and San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) in -8- January 27, 2000 Ci7 of Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR. accordance with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service survey protocols, A general inventory of wildlife species, Evaluating suitability of habitat for the sensitive resources listed above (and others that may be identified during the literature), and Noting other pertinent features or conditions of the site and adjacent lands. BiologicaiAssessment Report: LSA will prepare a tech- nical report describing field methods and results of the surveys. The report will include findings on sen- sitive species, an evaluation of potential sensitive habitat, plant and animal species present, and a gen- eral habitat description. Graphics will be included in the report, showing the site location, sensitive spe- cies sighrings, and sensitive habitat locations, as needed. The report will be suitable for inclusion in the technical appendix of the project EIR. Cultural Resources. LSA will conduct field surveys and prepare a cultural resources report to evaluate the potential for cultural resources to be affected by the proposed project. Records Search: LSA will conduct an archaeological and historical records review and literature search through the San Bernardino Archaeological Informa- tion Center of the Historical Resources Information System, located at the San Bernardino County Mu- seum. The Information Center houses the pertinent archaeological site and survey information necessary to determine whether cultural resources exist within study area boundaries. All pertinent references will be reviewed and summarized in the final report. The objective of this archival research will be (1) to establish the status and extent of previously re- corded sites, surveys, and excavations in the project area, and (2) to note what site types might be ex- pected to occur within the proposed project area, based on the existing data from archaeological sites located within one haft mile of the project area. In addition, if the potential for historic buildings, struc- tures, objects or features exists, contact will be made with knowledgeable individuals and local historical societies for their information about the area. Field Sun~ey: Based on the records search and re- sponses from historical resource inquides, an inten- sive, systematic on-site pedestrian survey will be conducted to determine the presence of cultural re- sources on previously unsurveyed property. If previ- ously recorded sites exist within the project bound- ary, these will be field checked, and existing site re- cords will be updated on revised (1993) site forms, consistent with the guidelines established by the State Office of Historic Preservation. The project site survey will be conducted by three archaeological surveyors walking a series of parallel transects across the 17.8-acre project parcel. These transects will be separated by approximately 5 to 10 feet, and will continue until the parcel is completely surveyed. Throughout the reconnaissance, any cul- tural resources that are encountered will be docu- mented as to their artifact assemblage and horizontal extent, and will be mapped and photographed. This proposal estimates that a maximum of one site will require documentation. Additional finds may require a budget augment. Subsequently, this information, along with the precise location of the site(s), will be submitted to the San Bernardino Archaeological In- formation Center for assignment of an official State of California trinomial designation. Accuracy of the field survey is dependent in large part on ground visibility. During a survey, ground visibility can vary from 0 to 100 percent, depending upon the vegetation type and time of year. Depend- ing upon the visibility, cultural resources not encoun- tered during the field survey, may be discovered dur- ing various phases of construction. Surv~ Relyore: LSA will develop a detailed archaeo- logical survey report consistent with the Office of His- todc Preservation's Archaeological Resource Manage- ment Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and For- mat. The report will contain a management sum- mary; discussion about the cultural setting; research design, if necessary; survey methodology; research findings; management considerations (including miti- gation and avoidance recommendations), and a con- fidential appendix (if any sites are documented) con- taining all proprietary site information. Financial/Fiscal Report. The following tasks define the scope of the study to be prepared to support the findings in the Initial Study and the EIR statement of overrides and findings (if necessary). These reports will be prepared to estimate the fiscal impact to the City budget of the proposed land use change and to assess the economic impacts of the proposed land use change upon existing businesses along Foothill Boulevard. The report will be prepared by Agajanian & Associates. ZSA Associates. -9- January 27, 2000 Ci~ of Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR Task 1: Prepare Financial/Fiscal Report A. Meet with city staff and obtain relevant budget documents and information. B. Obtain proposed land use and project character- istics information from supporting documents and city staff. Prepare build out characteristics for a residential development and the proposed commercial center. C. Identify relevant municipal revenue sources and service costs affected by the proposed land use changes from residential to commercial. D. Prepare estimation formulas for municipal reve- nue sources and service costs. Prepare estimates of project related municipal recurring revenues and service costs for the pro- posed commercial and residential build out. F. Estimate the net fiscal impact of the proposed project upon the municipal budget. Compare the fiscal impacts which would result from develop- ment of the project site with the proposed retail uses to fiscal impacts resulting from residential build out as allowed under existing zoning. G. Prepare a draft report documenting the analysis and summarizing findings. Submit draft report for · City staff review. H. Based upon comments from the City on the draft report, revise the draft report and prepare a final report. Submit final report to the City as comple- tions of Task 1. Task 2. Prepare Economic Impact Report A. MeetwithCitystaffandobtainrelevantbudgetdoc- uments and information (concurrent with Task 1 .A). Obtain proposed land use and project characteris- tics information from supporting documents, City staff, and applicant including ant/cipated sales and employment by retail goods and service categories. C. Assemble background inforrnation including sooio- economic (household and income), economic base (industry, employment, retail sales, and firms), com- mercial market (supply, demand, rents) necessary to assess local and subregional trade area condi- tions and trends. LSA Associates, Inc. - 10- Assemble existing commercial business information for Rancho Cucamonga based upon business li- cense data, retail sales data, and related available Analyze the retail and service sales impacts of the proposed commercial center upon citywide and trade area commercial demand patterns, focusing upon the Foothill Boulevard trade area. Analyze sources of available future commercial de- mand including trade area growth and commercially synergistic aspects of the proposed commercial center. Identify the role and market position of each cate- gory of business in the trade area and analyze the competitive impact of the proposed project upon local commercial, retail, and service demand pat- tems. Prepare a draft report documenting the analysis and summad,zing the findings. Submit draft report for City staff review. Based upon comments from the City on the draft report, revise the draft report and prepare a final report Submit final report to the City as completion of Task 2. Task 3. (OptionaO Mitigation of Economic Impacts Based upon the extensive market and demand analysis conducted in Task 2, this Task 3 seeks to formulate means to stimulate commercial businesses within the trade area by identifying. selecting, and targeting market supportable commercial uses for each category of busi- ness negatively impacted by the proposed project Such an evaluation would offer options to mitigate negative impacts the proposed development may have upon existing businesses, to stimulate commercial districts, and optimize overall commercial activity within the im- pacted trade area. Ou~ut: The compilation of technical studies and/or other data related to air quality, noise, traffic, biological resources, cultural resources, and fiscal/financial analysis required for a thor- ough understanding of the environmental impacts associated with development of the proposed project and preparation of the EIR. 3.3 Screencheck Draft EIR ]anua0, 27, 2000 Ci,ty qf Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR LSA will analyze the environmental consequences of the proposed retail commercial project for those topics of focus identified in the Initial Study. This analysis will consist of the following tasks: Evaluation and analysis of specific characteristics of the City as they affect and will be affected both di- rectly and in-directly by the proposed project. Assessment of the environmental impacts that will be created by the proposed project based on estab- lished thresholds of significance. Graphic depiction of environmental and planning factore and their relation to the proposed project and their implementation. Formulation of specific implementable, mitigation measures that can be effectively monitored dudng subsequent development Analysis of the level of significance of project im- pacts after the applicatjon of mitigation measures. Identification of potential altematives to the pro- posed project In addition to the preferred altema- tive up to three altematives, a "no project' altema- tive. consisting of both 'no build" and "existing Gen- eral Plan' scenados will be evaluated. The evalua- tion of altematives will provide a comparative analy- sis of altematives to the proposed project What · alternatives are studied in the EIR may be depend- · ant on public input dudng neighborhood or public scoping meetings(s) on the proposed retail canter. The potential grow~ indudng aspects of the project will be discussed. The following CEQA mandated topics will be ad- dressed: Any significant irreversible environmental changes that would be involved in the pro- posed action should it be implemented. Unavoidable adverse impacts. Cumulative impacts of the proposed project These work efforts will be compiled into a Screencheck Draft EIR, along with analysis topical issues required by CEQA, an introduction, and project description. It is anticipated that the EIR will address the following issues: Transportation (based on traffic study prepared by LSA in cooperation with the City). Proposed project impacts on traffic and drculation patterns in the pro- ject area will be described and where necessary mitigation measures will be identified to maintain the City's LOS D standards for artedals and the CMP LOS E standards for freeways. These mitiga- tion improvements will include intersection turn lanes, signalization, and segment lane additions. This analysis will include an examination of how development of the project site will affect access to adjacent land uses. Air Quali~y (based on a technical analysis to be prepared by LSA based on the traffic analysis). Air qualily impacts of the proposed project will be ana- lyzed for beth short-term and Iong-tarm impacts of the proposed project. LSA will identify an appropri- ate mitigation program for potentially significant air quality impacts such as dust impacts from gradin9 and long-term impacts from vehicle emissions. Noise (based on a technical acoustical analysis to be prepared by LSA). LSA will descdbe the existing noise environment on the project site, discuss the potential short-term consl;uction and long-term on- site and off-site noise impacts of the proposed pro- ject, and identify an appropdate mitigation program for potentially significant noise impacts. Biological Resources. The analysis in this section of the EI R will be based on the results of the biological assessment report prepared as a separate report The sectjon will summarize the results presented in the biological assessment report and will analyze potential impacts of the proposed project on vegeta- tion and wildlife and will present measures to miti- gate project impacts. The analysis will include a discussion of the types and amount of habitats present on site and the im- portance of these habitats in a regional context Sensitive species occurring, or potentially occurring, on the site will be identified and life histories and habitat requirements bde~y described. The status of any applicable regional conservation plans (i.e., San Bemardino Valley Multj-Species Habitat Con- servation Plan) will be summarized and the rele- vance of any such plans to the site and the pro- posed project will be described. The impact assessment will be based on thresholds of significance that are specific to the site, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the surrounding region. The impact assessment will also address cumula- LSA Associates, -71- January 27, 2000 of Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR tive impacts as they apply to relevant biological re- sources. Specific measures will be formulated to mitigate any significant impacts to vegetation and wildlife. In addressing project impacts and mitiga- tion, LSA will identity regulatory provisions that may apply to resources of the site (e.g., Endangered Species Act compliance and Section 404 permit- ring). Drainage (based on drainage studies or information provided by the applicant's engineer). This section will include an analysis of the proposed project on existing drainage patterns south of Foothill Boule- vard and west of Vineyard Avenue. We expect that mitigation for impacts will be standard conditions of approval such as an NPDES perraiL Mitigation measures will be provided for those impacts that are determined to be significant beyond standard requirements. Cultural Resour~ (based on records seamh and survey to be conducted by LSA). This section will include information on the resources present within the study area, and management considerations relative to protection of these resources and provide mitigation measures for those impacts that are de- termined to be significant The technical report will be included as a confidential appendix to the EIR. The Screencheck Draft EIR will be submitted to the City for review and will then be modified based on the City's comments. Following these modifications, a Draft EIR will be provided to City staff that includes the appropriate revisions. 15 copies of the Screencheck Draft EIR for City review, analyzing each of the environ- mental topics identified in the NOP. Task 4.0: Draft EIR Following review by the City and modifications to the Screencheck Draft EIR by LSA, a Draft EIR and Notice of Completion will be prepared and submitted to the City. LSA will distribute the Draft EIR to the State clear- inghouse and public based on a mailing list prepared by LSA will input by the City. One camera ready copy will be provided to the City for future copying needs. The documentwill also be provided on diskette in Word Per. fect 6.0 formal Output: Preparation and distribution of the 50 copies and one (1) camera ready, and one diskette copy of the Draft EIR. LSA Associates, - 12- Task 5.0: Final EIR The Final EIR will include the Draft EIR, technical ap- pendices, letters of cammenta and responses on the Draft EIR, Mitigation Monitoring Program, Facts and Findings, and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the City Council Resolution certitying the EIR and approving the proposed project 5.1. Response to Comntents At the close of the public review peded forthe Draft EIR, LSA will meet with City staff to review any comments on the Draft EIR that were received, and to discuss poten- tial responses to these comments. LSA will then formulate responses to the comments on the Draft EIR. A maximum of 80 hours of professional staff time has been budgeted for responding to cam- merits. Once draft responses to comments are com- pleted, they will be submitted to City staff for review and comment The City's cammenta will be incorporated into the response to cammenta document, which will be submitted to the City as an appendices in the Final EIR for use in public hearings. Output: Preparation of draft responses to all com- menta on the Draft EIR that were received dudrig the public review pedod for City staff review; revised responses to comments based on City comments. 5.2 Mitigation Monitoring Program Prior to Planning Commission headngs on the proposed project and EIR, LSA will prepare a mitigation monitor- ing plan, including monitoring forms, to assist the City in implementing the mitigation measures contained in the EIR. A mitigation monitoring program to ensure the implementation of EIR mitigation mea- sures. meeting applicable CEQA and local requirements. 5.3 Screowheck Hnal EIR LSA will prepare a Screencheck Final EIR that includes the Draft EIR, Response to Comments, findings and facts, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program for City review and cam- merit ]anua(y 2;', 2000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR Output: Prepare a Screencheck Final EIR for City review (5 copies). 5.4 Administrative Record Final EIR Pdor to Planning Commission action on the EIR, LSA will help the City prepare appropriate findings and, if needed, a statement of overriding considerations for the EIR. The findings and statement will be inco~orated into the Final EIR. The Final EIR will also include the Adminis~ative Record. Output: Planning and environmental findings needed for Planning Commission and City Council actions on the proposed amendments. (50 copies of Final EIR, and 1 camera ready and one diskette copy of the Administrative Final EIR.) Task 6.0 Public Hearings 6.1 Planning Comtnission and City Coutmil Hearing~ A maximum of four (4) public hearings, two before the Planning Commission and two before the City Council will be attended. Additional public hearings will be at- tended on a per meeting basis. Output: Attendance at public hearings, including pre- sentations as needed. Task 7.0 Project Management/ Adnlinistration The work program is intended to ensure the smooth functioning of the EIR process by maintaining open communications with the City. Z 1 Maintain Close Contact nith Ci{y Staff LSA will maintain continuous liaison with City, and will participate in rogular meetings to monitor progress and receive input. These meetings will also be used as pro-- ject management tools to keep staff and City derision- makers informed. LSA will prepare minutes of any prog- tess meetings to be provided to the City. Up to four (4) such liaison meetings will be held. The fiscal consultant will attend three staff meetings to coordinate work efforts and three meetings for work* shops on or presentations of the fiscal analysis to City decision-makers. Output: Ongoing coordination between consultant and City staff to ensure the smooth functioning of the EIR program. LSA Associates, Inc. ,' -13- ]anua0, 27, 2000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR Product Matrix The matrix that follows outlines products to be developed as pad of the program. This matrix format outlines consultant and City responsibilities for each task included in the program, and provides a handy reference. Product Matrix Retail Commercial Center EIR Task Product(s) Task 1.0 Project btitiation 1.1 Project Kick -off Meeting agenda Meeting (10 copies) List of needed documents (5 copies) Consultant Responsibilities Prepare meeting agenda. Attend meeting. Provide indicated number of copies to City. Task 2.0 Initial Study/Notice of Preparation 2.1 Initial Study/Notice of Preparation (NOP) Initial Study/Notice of Preparation (25 copies and 1 camera ready copy of the Notice of Preparation for distribution). Prepare and distribute the Initial Study/NOP. 15 copies of the Initial Study and NOP will be provided to the State Clearinghouse by overnight mail. City Responsibilities Obtain all relevant background documentation for the EIR. Schedule meeting time and location, and identify and notify in- house City staff and LSA. Review Initial Study and NOP and provide written comments to LSA. Help consultant prepare Notice of Preparation distribution list. Prepare advedisement and advedise availability of IS/NOP in the local newspaper. 2.2 Neighborhood or Public 8coping Meeting Letter to Include meeting date, time, and map as inclusion to NOP. Attend meeting introduce environmental process to the public and take public testimony. Task 3.0 Screencheck Draft EIR 3.1 Project Project description for Description inclusion in EIR. Prepare letter as a pad of the NOP and attend neighborhood or public scoping meeting. Prepare draft Project Description for City review; revise per City comments as part of Screencheck Draft EEIR. Provide meeting room and public advertisement of the meeting in the local newspaper. Attend meeting and introduce the project to the public. Review and provide one set of written comments on Project Description. LSA Associates, Inc. - 14- January 27, 2000 CitV of Rancho Cttcamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR Product Matrix Retail Commercial Center EIR Task 3.2 Prepare Technical Studies 3.3 Screencheck Draft EIR Product(s) Technical studies for traffic, air quality, noise, biological and cultural resources, and financial/fiscal impacts, Screencheck Draft EIR (15 copies of the Draft EIR for City staff review). Consultant Responsibilities Prepare technical studies for inclusion in the Screencheck Draft EIR. The financial/fiscal report will not be included in the EIR but will be provided to the City as a separate bound document. Compile all work efforts into a screencheck copy of the Draft EIR. 4.1 Prepare and Distribute Draft EIR Task 4.0 Draft EIR Draft EIR and Notice of Availability (NOA) (1 camera ready and 50 copies of the Draft EIR and 50 copies of the technical appendices for public distribution). Revise Screencheck Draft EIR per City staff comments and prepare Draft EIR for public distribution. Mail/distribute by certified return receipt indicated number of copies of Draft EIR. Task 5.0 Final EIR 5.1 Response to Comments 5,2 Mitigation Monitoring Program Response to comments on the Draft EIR will be incorporated as the Final EIR. Mitigation monitoring plan will be incorporated into Final EIR. 15 copies will be provided to the State Clearinghouse by overnight mail. Meet with City staff to review public comments on Draft EIR and discuss potential responses. Compile appropriate responses into Final EIR. Prepare mitigation monitoring plan prior to Planning Commission hearings. LSA Associates, Inc. - 15- City Responsibilities Review and provide one set of written comments on the technical studies as part of the review of the Screencheck Draft EIR. Review and provide one set of written comments on the Screencheck Draft EIR. Work with LSA to revise public and agency distribution list. Prepare advertise of availability of Draft EIR and advertise in the local newspaper, Provide meeting time and place and meet with LSA representative(s) to review public comments on Draft EIR. Review and provide one set of written comments on the mitigation monitoring plan. ]anuary 2L 2000 Cit'F of Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR Product Matrix Retail Commercial Center EIR Task 5.3 Screencheck Final Elf Product(s) Prepare Screencheck Final Elf (5 copies for City review). Prepare draft findings and statement of overriding considerations (I unbound copy and 1 copy on disk) Final EIR (50 copies) Consultant Responsibilities Prepare Final Elf to include Draft Elf, response to comments, and mitigation monitoring plan. Mail/Distribute required number of copies of the Final Elf to those persons/agencies who responded to the Draft Elf 10 days prior to cedi~cation of the Elf. 5.4 Administrative Record Final EIR Administrative Record Final EIR (1 unbound reproducible copy and 1 copy on computer disk). Task 6.0 Public Hearings 6.1 Planning Attend up to 2 meetings Commission and make presentations as needed. LSA is capable of preparing a power point presentation of the Elf for public hearings. Following cedi~cation and adoption, prepare Final Elf document that includes the Draft Elf, response to comments, findings, statement of overriding considerations, mitigation monitoring plan, and public hearing record (by reference). Consultant shall be present at scheduled public hearings, and be prepared to make presentations and answer general questions from public, staff, and Planning Commission. Ci9 Responsibilities Review and provide one set of written comments on the Final EIR, Advertise availability of Final EIR and any public hearings in the local newspaper, Note: Final findings and statement of overriding considerations will be prepared by the lawyer(s) for the City. Review preprint copy of Final Elf. Prepare staff reports. Secure meeting room. City shall be responsible for public distribution and/or advertisement in accordance with open meeting laws and standard City noticing procedures, including distribution and posting of notices for all public hearings. LSA Ass~iates, Inc. , -16- ]anuaCV 27. 2000 Cit~ of Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR Task 6.2 City Council Product Matrix Retail Commercial Center EIR Product(s) Attend up to 2 meetings and make presentations as needed. LSA is capable of preparing a power point presentation of the EIR for public hearings. Consultan t Responsibilities Consultant shall be present at scheduled public hearings, and be prepared to make presentations and answer general questions from public, staff, and City Council. Task 7.0 Project Administration 7.1 Maintain Close Attendance at up to 4 Contact City Staff project meetings. Maintain continuous liaison with City staff and the applicant, and provide monthly updates to City staff. Ci9 Responsibilities Prepare staff reports. Secure meeting room. City shall be responsible for public distribution and/or advertisement in accordance with open meeting laws and standard City noticing procedures, including distribution and posting of notices for all public hearings. Participate in meetings. LSA Associates, Inc. -17- .Ci.ty Of Rancho Cucamonga Retail Commercial Center EIR SCHEDULE AND PROIECT MANAGEMENT Project Schedule Following is a time line chart~ outlining the schedule for completing the Retail Commercial Center EIR. Inherent in this schedule are assumptions regarding the length of time required for completing the City's objectives according to its Request for Proposal. Schedule and Budget Control LSA tracks project schedules by conducting weekly staff meetings to check project progress, assign staff resources as necessary, and confirm deliverable dates. The GANTT Chart schedule we have gen- erated for the Retail Commercial Center EIR will be updated as necessary, if time frames for any of the tasks change. Monthly Status Reports each project, and cam/it throughout a project and be- yond. Specific quality management tasks include the following: Assign the most appropriate Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager for the project, and assure their availability throughout the project. Have the LSA Project Manager, along with the City's Manager, systematically review the work program to assure that both have clear under- standing of project definition and scope of work. Assign a project team with experience on similar projects, and coordinate with task managers to ensure staffing availability. Review all work to be performed, and ensure that significant impacts on external agencies are identified. LSA will submit a monthly progress report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that includes: (1) a summary of work completed during the previous month, (2) a summary of work to be completed during the cur- rent month, (3) discussion of potential problem ar- eas or project issues, and (4) estimated percentage of project completion by task. In addition to the writ- ten status reports, LSA's Project Manager will main- tain ongoing verbal communication with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Project Manager. Quali.ty Control LSA's philosophy is to provide the highest quality professional services. LSA manages quality through- out the life of the project, not merely at the end of the project. LSA's overall goal is to improve quality on each subsequent project. This requires implementa- tion of strategies to assure quality at the beginning of Assure that applicable City, County, and State standards, policies, and procedures are jointly understood by project team members. Assure timely delivery of project documents. Assure quality of preliminary work products and cost estimates, and timely delivery at lowest cost. Review project status with the City at regular pro- ject intervals, to assure implementation of the original scope of work and harmonious function- ing of all team members. Identify any potential conflicts due to potential changes in scope. Review performance with the City's Project Man- ager to make any adjustments required for successful project completion and determine improvements for future projects. The time line chart was prepared using Microsoft Project, and will be made available to the City in disk form upon award of contract. LSA Associates, Inc. - 18- ]anua~y 27, 2000 Task Name Task 1 Project Initiation Autho~zation Io Proceed Kick off Meeting Task 2 Initial Stucly/Notlce of Preparation Prepare IS/NOP IS/NOP Public Review Period (3~days} Pubtic Scoping Meeting Task 3 Screencheck Draft EIR Prepare Traffic Study Prepare Air Quality Study Prepare Noise Study Prepare Cuffural ResOurces Study California Gnatcatcher Surveys Sen Bemardino Kangaroo Rat Surveys Prepare Biological Repod Prepare Fiscal Analysis Prep,~re Screencheck DEIR Submit for City Review City Review Task 4 Draft EIR Revise DEIR per City Comment Prool check DEIR to City City Review DEIR Print/Circulate DEIR Ior Public Review Public Review of DEIR (45*days) Prepare MMP City Review of MMP Revise MMP par City Comment ~ Stad Tue 3/7/00 Wed ~ Tue 3/7/00 Tue 3/7/00 Wed :3/8/00 Wed 318/00 Wed 3/6/00 Frl 4/14/00 Wed 3/8/00 Mon 3/1:3/00 Tue :3/14/00 Fd 4/14/00 + .... MonS~15/O0" ' Frl7/2t/O0 Mon 4/17/00 Fri 4/21/00 Fd 4/14/00 Fd 3/17/00 Wed 4/26/60 Mon 4/10/00 Fri 4/28/00 Wed 4/16/00 Tue 6/2j00 Tue 5/2/00 Mon 5/16/00 RETAIL COMMERCIAL CENTER · . EIR SCHEDULE b '00 I Mar '00 I Apr *00 I May *00 FInish t312oI27151121t9126121911612313017114121128{4111118t25~2 37+ 3/2e · · · I II · 91161231301611312012713 I 124 1 Project: Rancho Cucamonga Date: january27,2000 SCHEDULE.MPP {File] LSA City Milestone Summmy Public Review LSA Associates, Inc Task 5 Final EIR Prepare Response to Comments City Review ol Response to Comments Prepare FEIR Ior Public Headngs :'rpsk 6 Public Hearings Planning Commission Planning Commission 2nd Meeting City Council City Council 2nd Reading Stad Fd 7/7/00 Fri 7/7100 Fd 7/28100 Mon 8/7/00 Wed 8/'23/00 Wed 8/23/00 Tue 9/5/O0 Tue 9119100 Tue 10rJ/O0 FInish Mone/14/OO Thu 7/27/00 Fd 8/4100 Mon 8/I 4100 Tue 10/3/00 Wed 8/23/00 Tue 9/5/00 Tue 9/I Tue 10/3/00 RETAIL COMMERCIAL CENTER · . EIR SCHEDULE b '00 I Mar '00 I Apr '00 I May *OO I Jun '00 I Jul '00 Aug '00 t31201271 5 112Jt91261 2 I 9 116123J30J 7 1~412112el 4 I' 1~812sl 2 9 16123J301 6 11312012 ,,,, ,~ 8/23 · 9/5 · 9/19 · 10/3 Project: Rancho Cucamong8 Date: January27, 2000 q~SCHEDULE.MPP{Fila} LSA City Milestone SummaW Public Review LSA Associates, Inc. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,S affReport DATE: March 1,2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: AGREEMENT WITH SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS FOR THE PREPARATION OF A TRAIL SYSTEM MASTER PLAN WITHIN THE FORMER SOUTHERN PACIFIC BALDWIN PARK RAILROAD CORRIDOR. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council, through minute action, authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In November 1998, the SANBAG Board authorized the establishment of a subcommittee with representatives from the cities of Rialto, Fontaria, Rancho Cucamonga, Upland, and Montclair to coordinate the development of a master plan for a multi-purpose trail system within the former Southern Pacific Baldwin Park Branch right-of-way owned by SANBAG. The subcommittee has designated the City of Rancho Cucamonga as the lead agency for this effort. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, was appointed as Chairman of the subcommittee. This Agreement establishes the relationship between SANBAG and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the development of the trail system master plan. FISCAL IMPACT This Agreement will fully fund the master plan at no cost to the City· In January 2000, the SANBAG Board approved an allocation of $100,000 in Valley Measure I Traffic Management and Environment Enhancement funds for the development of a trail system master plan within the former Southern Pacific Baldwin Park Branch (and former Pacific Electric line). The Board also approved an amendment to the SANBAG Fiscal Year 2000 Budget creating a new task (TN 0035500 - Pacific Electric Trail Master Plan). Three qualified consultants were invited to submit proposals. Staff anticipates bringing the consultant contract to the City Council for approval on your next ag~.nda. R ectf ubmitted, · velopment Director Attachments: Agreement 00-104 OF C~CA~ONGA Shelf Report DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 1, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY INCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT (JAIBG) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the allocation of the Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant to the Regional Juvenile Crime Enforcement Coalition (RJCEC) for San Bernardino County to support youth, school and community safety. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In 1999, the California Office of Criminal Justice Planning (OCJP) issued funds under the JAIBG Program. The purpose of this Program is to provide funding to local governments to develop programs that promote greater accountability in the juvenile justice system. There are 12 program purpose areas that can be funded by this grant: (:1) Facilities including building, expanding, renovating or training correctional staff; (2) Developing and administering accountability based sanctions for juvenile offenders; (3) Hiring juvenile judges, probation officers or defenders; (4) Hiring prosecutors; (5) Prosecution funding to address drug, gang and youth violence prosecutions; (6) Technology and equipment for prosecutors; (7) Juvenile court and juvenile probation officers for accountability and reducing recidivism; (8) Establish juvenile gun courts that target young firearm offenders; (9) Establish youth drug courts; (10) Establish and maintain interagency information-sharing programs to make more informed decisions; (11 ) Establish and maintain accountability-based programs designed to protect students and school personnel from drug, gang and youth violence; and/or (12) Implement a policy of juvenile drug testing within the juvenile justice system. The JAIBG also allows for the creation of a Regional Juvenile Crime Enforcement Coalition (RJCEC) to develop a coordinated juvenile enforcement program and to allow lesser fund amounts allocated to cities to be leveraged as a larger regional amount. We took this approach last year. A greater impact was created because of this collaborative partnership between the cities, county and high schools. The grant was used last year to hire 12 juvenile probation officers and juvenile traffic hearing officers that were assigned to school campuses. While it is too early to evaluate objective statistics about the program, the participating schools, including the Chaffey Joint Union High School District, have affirmed their support for continuing the program. This program is designed to insure that juveniles are held accountable for their actions and not lost in the system. With increased probation officers and a presence on schools the chances for keeping juveniles from repeating mistakes increases. While the amount of the grant will be only slightly higher this year, it is anticipated that an additional probation officer can be added because there will not be any more start-up costs, It is my recommendation that the City Council approve the attached resolution that will pool our JAIBG funds with other cities, school districts and the county. This will enable this cooperative program of juvenile accountability to continue for a second year. Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager -2- ?/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY INCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT (JAIBG) FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING (OCJP) TO THE REGIONAL JUVENILE CRIME ENFORCEMENT COALITION (RJCEC) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declines to directly accept funds made available through the Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant (JAIBG) Program administered by the Office of Criminal Justice Planning (hereafter referred to as OCJP). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga waives its right to its entire direct subgrant award and authorizes the funds to be expended by the County of San Bernardino, Regional Juvenile Crime Enforcement Coalition (RJCEC), for the mutual benefit of both units of local government. IT IS AGREED that any liability arising out of the performance of this Grant Award Agreement, including civil court actions for damages, shall be the responsibility of the grant recipient and the authorizing agency. The State of California and OCJP disclaim responsibility for any such liability. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to supplant expenditures controlled by this body. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1 st day of March, 2000, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY SERVICES s Rem Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: DATE: SUBJECT: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II March 1. 2000 Approval of a Request for Co-Sponsorship of the Hillside Community Church's 2"~ Annual Soapbox Classic and Mega-Fun Play Day to be held on May 29, 2000, (move-in date: May 28, 2000) at the Epicenter Sports Complex and Waive Associated Fees and Charges. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council approve the request for co-sponsorship of the Hillside Community Church's 2n~ Annual Soapbox Classic and Mega-Fun Play Day to be held oh May 29, 2000, at the Epicenter Sports Complex and waive associated fees and charges. BACKGROUND: Staff has received a request from Hillside Community Church for the City to co-sponsor Hillside Community Church's 2"~ Annual Soapbox Classic and MegaoFun Play Day to be held on May 29, 2000, (move*in date: May 28, 2000) at the Epicenter Sports Complex and to waive associated fees and charges. '\ . x I ~ was As Council may recall, the inaugural Soapbo C ass c held last year at the Epicenter on May 30, 1999. The event was very well attended and received by the community. The event included soapbox races, pinewood derby races, big wheel races for toddlers and game booths and activities for children of all ages. The Fire Department also had a number of their vehicles on site for youngsters to explore. Attendance at the event was estimated to be near 20,000 and included participation by hundreds (800) of community volunteers, many community groups and local businesses. Based upon the request from the applicant that staff received last year and the analysis of the waiver request in relation to Resolution 99-049 (A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Adopting Facility Rental Fee Waiver and City Service Charge Waiver Policies for the Epicenter), City Council concurred with staffs recommendation and last year waived the rental fee for the event but did not waive the direct city services fee. In addition, the Crn, COUNCe. APPROVAL OF CO-SPONSCRSHIP OF HILLSlOE C0e, e,~NrrY CHURCH S~x CLASSIC AND MEGA-PLAY DAY M~RCH I, 2000 PAGE 2 applicant was required to provide a security/damage deposit, comprehensive public liability insurance and was required to pay applicable admissions, concessions and merchandise taxes. Throughout last years planning for the event, Hillside Community Church stressed that the event was not a fundraiser. They noted that in fact, the event was very expansive to produce and was possible only through the generosity of a large number of sponsors. In addition, Hillside Community Church worked hard to meet its and the City's goal of fadlitating a non-religious event for the entire Rancho Cucamonga community. ANALYSIS: As mentioned earlier, in March 1999, City Council passed Resolution Number 99-049, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Adopting Facility Rental Fee Waiver and City Service Charge Waiver Policies for the Epicenter. Staff has reviewed the request from Hillside Community Church for co-sponsorship of the 2''~ Annual Soapbox Classic and Mega*Play Day and finds that the proposed event meets the cdteda and standards outlined in the specified Resolution for both a facility rental fee waiver and waiver of direct city service charge. The table below outlines the results of this analysis. The requesting organization must conduct business in the C~. Yes The organization must be a non-profit organization with a City business license. Yes The proposed event may not limit attendance on the basis of any discriminatory Yes cdteda, is not designed to induce membership into the organization or financial support for the organization and is intended to appeal to all residents of the City. The proposed event is not anticipated to cause significant damage to the facility, or Yes All of the above cdteda would have to be met. Yes The proposed event must provide benefit to a City program or service. Yes The proposed event would not subject the City to foreseeable liability. Yes The proposed event will promote the City on a regional or greater scale, Yes The event is intended to result jn increased patronage to local businesses or involveYes numerous community organizations. '\ The event will offer City residents a unique community activity. Yes The proposed event will not conflict with similar events. Yes The proposed event is not designed as a profit making activity Yes Should Council approve the co-sponsorship of the 2n~ Annual Soapbox Classic and Mega- Play Day, Hillside Community Church has agreed to advertise the City's participation and sponsorship through its direct mailing advertising, newspaper advertising and large banners displayed at the event. FISCAL IMPACT: If co-sponsorship of the 2"~ Annual Soapbox Classic and Mega-Play Day and waiver of the rental fee and direct city charges are approved by the City Council the fiscal impact of this action would be as follows: AI>PROVAL OF C0-SPONSORSHIp OF HILLSIDE COM~UNt'ITf CHURCH SOAItOX CLASSIC AND MEGA-PLAy DAY PAGE 3 Base Rent Maintenance Expenses Total $ 2,450.00 $ 9.997,82 $12,447.82 As specified in Resolution 99-049, co-sponsorship of the event and waiver of assodated fees and charges would not waive or reduce the following requirements: (1) refundable damage/security deposit, (2) comprehensive public liability insurance and (3) applicable taxes, i.e., admissions, concessions and merchandize taxes. In addition, other conditions of use may be required for the event as identified through the City's event team process. Such requirements may include the need for private security, first aid stations with EMT or advanced first aid personnel, securing appropriate permits and inspections as required by the Building and Safety Division and Fire Distdct for stages, electrical and secudng port-a- potties/hand washing stations for the event. Respe I '~ Community IS;rvices Director I:~COMMSERIACouncil&Boafds~CityCounciAStaffReportslhillsidec~sponsor3. f . O0, doc RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~IItVICI$ TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager BY: DATE: SUBJECT: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II February 17, 2000 ~AL OF A RE(:X::~VWENDATION ~ THE PARK AND RECREATION ~ISSION TO WANE BASE RENT OF TI-E RANCHO~EPICENTER TO ALLOW FOR rl'S USE BY LOCAL HIGH SCHOOLS FOR ~ EX:XJBtEFEADER BASEBALL~SONAONEYEARTRIALBASIS RECOMMENDATION The Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council approve use of the Epicenter Stadium for two doubleheader baseball games involving Rancho Cucamonga High Schools on a one year trial basis. In accordance with Resolution 99-049, it is recommended that the base rental fee for the Epicenter be waived. The High Schools shall conduct ticket sales and/or fundraising activities and use their best efforts to pay the City's direct costs. This policy shall be re-evaluated following the one-year trial period. BACKGROUND Staff is offering the following background information to the City Council regarding current policies at the Epicenter Adult Sports Complex. During the 1980s, youth sports programs experienced tremendous growth throughout the City. At the same time, the adult sports programs were also expanding. The demand for facilities, especially lighted sports fields, was tremendous. To address this need, the City Council approved the development of an Adult Sports Complex to be located in the industrial area of the City. The intent was to move adult sports programs out of the neighborhood and community parks and into an area of the City that would allow for evening and late hour lighted venues and weekend activities. This action would open the neighborhood and community parks for use by youngsters. Since its conception, the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex was envisioned by City Council to be avenue for adult sport activities, alleviating the strain on neighborhood and CITY COUNQL MEETING HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL GAMES AT THE EPICY,.N~F~ MARCH 1, 2000 PAGE 2 community parks and allowing youngsters to play sport activities at venues closer to their homes. Between 1993 and the present date, the Epicenter Stadium and Adult Sports Complex has been primarily used for adult activities. Exceptions to the intended use have been made based upon individual review by City Council of activities that are regional in nature. An example of such an exception is the annual Inland Valley Daily Bulletin All Stars Game that is played at the Stadium in mid-June and draws players and spectators from throughout the Inland Empire. As the Council is aware, the use of the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex is on a 'pay- for-play" basis. Staff has worked diligently since the opening of the facility to maximize revenues wherever possible in order to keep the operating cost for the facility at a minimum. At the same time, the number of requests for waiver of City fees and charges has increased. To assist City Council in the review of such requests, Resolution Number 99.-049, A ResolUtion of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Adopting Facility Rental Fee Waiver and City Service Charge Waiver Policies for the Epicenter, was adopted on March 3, 1999. A copy of the resolution has been attached for your information. The Resolution sets forth specific criteda and standards for the approval of such requests. One such standard contained in the Resolution is that the proposed event promote the City on a regional or greater scale. As an example, if one of our local high schools submitted a request to City Council to hold a league baseball game at the Epicenter Stadium and requested the City Council to grant a waiver of rental fees and direct City service charges, staff would review the request against the following criteda and standards as specified in Resolution Number 99-049: The requesting organization must conduct business in the City. Yes The organization must be a non-profit organization with a City businessYes license. The proposed event may not limit attendance on the basis of any discriminatory Yes criteria, is not designed to induce membership into the organization or financial support for the organization and is intended to appeal to all residents of the City. The proposed event is not anticipated to cause significant damage to the Yes All of the above cdteria would have to be met. Yes The proposed event must provide benefit to a City program or service.No The proposed event would not subject the City to foreseeable liabilityYes The proposed event will promote the City on a regional or greater scaleNo CITY COUNC3L MEETING HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL GAMES AT T'rE EPI(]~tl"E~ M.~C3-~ 1, 2000 PAGE 3 The event is intended to result in increased patronage to local businessesNo or involve numerous community organizations. The event will offer City residents a unique community activity. No The proposed event will not conflict with similar events. Yes The proposed event is not designed as a profit making activity. Yes As noted eadier, a local youth sports game does not conform to the intended use of the Adult Sports Complex, therefore, staff would not recommend approval based upon that fact. Putting this 'youth/adult' issue aside however, and based upon the results of the Resolution analysis, staff would recommend that the City Council waive the rental fees for the game, but not waive the direct service charges. ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT To assist the C~ Council in their discussion, staff has outlined some of the fees and charges that would be associated with an activity such as a high school baseball game to be played in the stadium. Based upon a ticketed evening doubleheader game with concessions available and an estimated audience of 1,500 spectators, fees would be as follows: · Base Rent $1,500.00 · Estimated Maintenance Expenses $3,698.00 · Admissions Tax $ 450.00 · Securib/ :$ 373.00 Total Fees $6,021.00 · Security/Damage Deposit $2,500.00 In addition, the school would be required to provide a $2 million dollar c.,gmprehensive, public liability insurance policy naming the City as additionally insured. PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Park and Recreation discussed this issue at their meeting on February 17, 2000 and developed the recommendation identified above, The Commission is recommending that an exception be made to the adult use only policy at the Adult Sports Complex. Specifically, the Commission recommends that local High Schools be allowed to conduct two doubleheader baseball games in the Stadium dudng the upcoming spdng season to determine whether the schools will be able to raise enough funds, through low cost ticket sales and concessions, to fully pay the city for the direct costs associated with maintenance, field preparation and lighting. Based upon conversations with the School 77 CITY COUNCIL MELtrING HIGH SCHOOL BASBALL GAMES AT ~ El>lCrd~d~ MARCH 1, 2000 PAGE 4 coaches and athletic directors, Commission members were optimistic that the schools could meet the fee requirements. The Commission felt that allowing the teams to conduct a nighttime doubleheader in the Stadium would result in parents and families of the players being able to attend and enjoy the games. Typically, High School baseball games are conducted on weekday afternoons and not very many parents can attend. The Commission felt that conducting this special series of games in the Stadium could generate considerable community excitement regarding High School baseball. In their discussion. the Commission also indicated their strong position that the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex remain a 'pay-for-play" venue. They were not willing to support a recommendation asking that direct city cost fees be waived, either now or in the future. In addition, the Commission is not recommending any permanent change to the adult use programming philosophy at the facility. The Commission was very concerned that allowing this trial peded for local High Schools might open the door to other youth related sports groups feeling that they could request use and/or a waiver of fees for the Epicenter. The Commission approved the recommendation, however, based upon their feeling that the High Schools will be successful in raising the funds necessary to pay the City's costs. Members also commented that varsity High School baseball games are close to being an adult activity, involving 16-18 year olds. The Commission stated that if the tdal program is successful, they might consider recommending a more encompassing policy change to the City Council in future years. Respe rdleKev Community Services Director hICOMMSERV~Council&BoardstCilyco~nciAStaffRp~sthighschooluseofEplcenter3.01.00 OF CUCAMONGA Sm Repor DATE: March 1, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECt: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Kenneth Fung, Project Manager APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH L. D. KING, INC. TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE METROLINK STATION EXPANSION, PHASE II PROJECT IN' THE AMOUNT OF $219,718.40 ($199,744.00 PLUS 10%) TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 151-4637-9932 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve, award and execute the subject Professional Services Agreement with L. D. King, Inc. to provide Engineering Design Service for the Metrolink Station Expansion, Phase II Project in the amount of $219,718.40 ($199,744.00 plus 10%) from Account No. 151-4637-9932. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City's Metrolink Station, since its inauguration, has been a success. An unfortunate consequence of this success has been that the existing parking lot is filled to overflowing. To remedy this, the City applied for and received Federal Funds for the design and construction of the Metrolink Station Expansion, Phase II Project. This project will increase the number of parking stalls from the existing 330 to nearly 1,000 and extend the south loading platform. On October 14, 1999, the City sent Requests for Proposals to eight consultant firms and advertised in two minority newspapers. Four proposals were received by the November 17, 1999 due date. A consultant selection committee made up of City personnel and a representative of the Southem California Regional Rail Authority evaluated the proposals and came to the consensus that the consultant firm of L. D. King, Inc. would be the best choice. Since the firm had previously designed Phase I, the committee felt that L. D. King, Inc. was well qualified and possessed a detailed knowledge of the project. L. D. King's proposed fee is within federally programmed funding for design services. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT METROLINK EXPANSION PROJECT, PHASE II March 1, 2000 Page 2 Per Federal requirements, a pre-award audit was initiated. The audit has shown that L. D. King, Inc. meets all qualifications required by Federal guidelines and the City's criteria for a competent design consultant. Re u mi , . William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:KF:ls THE CII~Y OF ~ANCHO CIJCAPIONGA Staff Report DATE: March 1, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Mayor Pm Tem, Diane Willjams and Councilmember Jim Curatalo, As Members of the Public Safety Committee SUBJECT: Automated Red Light Camera Enforcement Pilot Program RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the concept of an Automated Red Light Camera Enforcement Pilot Program to be implemented within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYISIS: As you are aware, over the past several months, the Public Safety Subcommittee has been discussing the occurrence of red light violations within the City, and is seeking ways to improve traffic safety for pedestrians and drivers alike. After much discussion and investigation, the Subcommitee has concluded that the implementation of an Automated Red Light Camera Enforcement Program would provide an additional traffic safety benefit to the community as it could help to reduce the number of red light camera citations, and prevent potential accidents caused by red light violations..The Subcommittee has learned that more than 50 cities nation- wide have implemented Red Light Camera Enforcement Programs. Additionally, close to 40% of these cities are located in California. Below is a brief overview of the Program's components: Red Light Camera System The red light camera system consists of two pads - a podable enforcement unit and a "housing" unit. The podable enforcement unit is comprised of a computer, high-speed camera and the housing unit, dedicated to a single intersection, houses the podable camera. The podable camera can be rotated to various "housing" units located at different intersections. Activation of the red light camera occurs only when a vehicle is detected entering the intersection after the signal has turned red, and remains dormant at all other times. The camera performs 24-hour enforcement, and can take up to 700 pictures within that time period. Program Implementation Many red light camera enforcement companies offer turnkey programs which provides for the installation, operation and maintenance of all necessary equipment, including the processing violation photographs and tickets. The processing of violations includes the collection and scanning of film; identification of vehicle owner via an on-line link to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV); printing and mailing of violation notices and tracking of payments and court appearances. After review of the photographic evidence and depending on state law requirements, tickets are issued to the registered owner within 11 days of the violation. In addition, individuals with questions or concerns about the ticketing process will have access to a 1-800 number that will enable them to speak with a representative. Lastly, red light camera violations carry the same monetary penalties as violations resulting from conventional police enforcement. If the registered owner does not respond to the ticket, state law enables the DMV to suspend the owner's driving license. The current fine for a red light violation is $270. It is anticipated that the implementation of an Automated Red Light Camera Enforcement Pilot Program would include one street intersection for a period of 3 years. Program Results After researching cities that currently have a Red Light Camera Enforcement Program in place, staff found that all of these cities have reported a significant reduction in the number of red light violations. The City of Los Angeles, for example, reported a 92% reduction in violations at various intersections. In addition, the City of San Francisco found that within the first 6 months of implementation, its number of red light violations decreased by 41%. Lastly, the City of Oxnard, in cooperation with the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety reported a 42% reduction in violations the first year of implementation. Program Cost and Services Given the "newness" of the Red Light Camera Enforcement Program, the Subcommittee concluded that it would be beneficial to explore cost packages that demonstrate flexibility regarding required financial commitments and contract periods. The Subcommittee has identified one cost package in particular, which would require the City to pay $110 per paid citation for a contract period of 3 years. The City would not be responsible for any construction, program implementation or ongoing operation and maintenance costs. Under this option, the City does not own the equipment, but has the option to purchase it. The type of services provided by red light camera enforcement providers include, but is not limited to: the installation and design of equipment; maintenance and repair of camera and housing units; a computerized traffic complaint program which includes printed forms, mailing forms, and mailing postage costs; access to motor vehicle databases in all 50 states; training for Rancho Cucamonga Police Department and court personnel; provision of technical experts regarding the accuracy of the Program; and monthly reports regarding program results. It is also important to note that the implementation of a Red Light Camera Enforcement Program is not guaranteed to generate a sufficient amount of revenue that will cover all program expenses. The number of citations generated is dependent upon the City's size, intersection traffic flow, location of intersection(s), number of "housing" units and number of violators. Potential Site Locations -2- After evaluating City red light violation traffic statistics, staff found the following intersections to have the highest number of red light citations issued over the past 4 fiscal years: Civic Center/Haven; Archibald/Base Line; Foothill/Haven; and Arrow/Haven. Staff also evaluated the number of collisions and fatalities caused by red light violations, and found little or no statistical significance regarding the location and number of collisions/fatalities. Given its central location and high traffic count of 49,100 cars daily, the Subcommittee recommends that the intersection of Foothill/Haven as a possible candidate for a Red Light Camera Enforcement Pilot Program. Needed Support From Affected Agencies To effectively implement a Red Light Camera Enforcement Program, the City will need the support of the San Bernardino County Court System and Cal Trans, as both agencies would be directly impacted. Staff has informally discussed the enforcement program with the San Bernardino County Court representatives, and has received their support. With respect to Cal Trans, the City will need to obtain the Agency's approval regarding any red light camera housing installation that may occur on Route 66/Foothill Boulevard. Community Awareness and Education Should the City Council wish to pumue the implementation of a Red Light Camera Enforcement Program, the Subcommittee recommends the development of a comprehensive public educational campaign to address the community's questions and concerns. This campaign would be activated before and during the implementation of the Program. Examples of a public educational campaign would include, but are not limited to: distribution of informational press releases; broadcast of messages on RCTV-3; distribution of flyers/announcements at public facilities; publication of informative articles in City newsletters and websites; and the implementation of a 45 day warning ticket period. Respectfully Submitted, Mayor Pro Tern Diane Willjams //~uncilmember Jim Curatalo / -3- DATE: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA //~~ March 1, 2000 STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council !_ _(~ _ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Diane O'Neal, Assistant To The City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 13 - THE SAFE DRINKING WATER, CLEAN WATER, WATERSHED PROTECTION AND FLOOD PROTECTION ACT RECOMMENDATION The City Council approve this Resolution in support of Proposition 13. Background On October 7, 1999 Governor Gray Davis signed Assembly Bill 1854 which placed Proposition 13 on the March 7th ballot. Proposition 13 is a $1.97 billion general obligation bond measure that if approved by the voters on March 7, 2000 would target $85 million for clean water projects in the Chino Basin. In December of 1999, CCWD conducted a presentation to the City Council detailing the Chino Basin's water needs because the City is a part of the Chino Basin. The presentation outlined how best to enhance the Chino basin water supplies, protect and enhance water quality, enhance management of the water basin and to support the Water Bond in 2000. Analysis Proposition 13 is the largest water bond measure in California's history and if adopted will provide nearly 1,000,000 acre feet of new dry-year water supply. The measure will also allow important improvements to water quality and stabilize the core water supplies in the Bay Delta, the source of drinking water for more than 22 million Californians. Proposition 13 will also help meet the expected increase of 15 million people by the year 2020 through a variety of clean water, watershed, Mayor and Members of the City Council Resolution in Support of Proposition 13 March 1, 2000 Page Two flood protection and water supply improvement programs. Attached for the City Council's review is a listing provided by CCWD outlining those benefits. Proposition 13, if approved, will provide strong support for water quality and watershed benefits for the Chino Basin of which the City is a part of. Staff recommends approval of this Resolution in support of Proposition 13. espec~.l~ Diane O'Neal Assistant To The City Manager Attachment WATER OUALITY/WATERSHED BENEFITS Safe Drinking Water Program Loans and grants for undertaking infrnsu'ucture improvements and rehted actions to meet safe drinking water standards; leverages five federal dollars for every state doUar. Watershed Protection Program (statewide) Grants (subject to appropriation by the Legislature) to assist local agencies in implementing multi-objective watershed plans that help restore fragile ecosystems by controlling or eliminating pollution, reducing flooding, controlling erosion, impwring water quality; 60% of funds to be spent in six-county area of Southern California; earmarks $35 naillion for grants to small communities; wanders $2 million to Pajaro River Watershed Flood Prevention Authority, $5 million to ClOver Creek Flood Protection and Environmental Enhancement Project, $2 million for Clear Lake watershed and $1 million for Russian River watershed. Non-Point Source Pollution Control Program Ca'anu (subject to appropriation by the Legislature) for lo~al projects that protect the beneficial uses of water through the control of non-poim soutee pollution; 60% of funds to be spent in six-coumy arr, a of Southc, rn California; transfers $10 million for research and mitigation to protect wat~ quality from pesticidesi $5 million can be used for loans to ~nanc~ consauction of pwjects designed to manage animal nutrients from animal fe~;ling opesations. Clean Water Program Grants and low-interest loans to aid in construction or implementation of projects under the Clean Water Act including $30.5 million for loans pursuant to Clean Water Act, $34 million for grants for consauction of water trcatm~mt works in small communities, $35.5 million (subject to appropriation by the Legislature) for treaunem works in Manteca, Stockton, Tracy and Orange Cove and $7 million to local agencies for groundwater remediation projects. Coastal Non-Point Source Pollution Control Grants and low-interest loans (subject to appropriation by the Legislature) to aid in ooustruction or implementation of projects to improve water quaairy at public beaches; 60% of funds to be spent in six-county area of Southern California; earmarks $4 million {subject to appropriation of the Legislature) to City of Huntington B each to study biological contaminants in tidal and coastal marshes and $3 million (subject to appropriation of the Legislature) for environmental and engineering studies for the San Diego Regional Conveyance Facility by the $an Diego County Water Authority. Seawater Intrusion Control Provides loans (subject to appropriation by the Legislature) to control seawater intrusion; transfers unallncated funds from Proposition 204. River Protection Program Provides funding (subject to appropriation by the Legislature) for the acquisition and restoration of riparian habitat, rivefine aquatic habitat and other lands in close proximity to riven and streams; requires that 60% of funds be used for projects near metropolitan areas; earmarks $I0 million for the San/oaquin River Parkway Conservancy and $2.5 million for the Kern River Parkway Project. Coastal Watershed Salmon Habitat Program' Provides funding (subjec~ to appropriation by the Legislature) to protect, restore, acquire and enhance habitat for salmon; may bc used to leverage funds, when available. $ 70 million 90 million 100 million 100 million 90 million 25 million million 25 million Water and Watershed Education Program Provides funding (subject to appropriation by the Legishtura) for various watershed education programs including the San Joaquin Valley Water Institute at California State University at Fresno ($3 million), Delta Science Center ($2 million) and Watershed Scienc: Laboratory in the North Delta ($3 million) g million WATER SUPPLY BENEFITS Groundwater Storage $200 million Grants (subject to appropriation by the Legislature) for feasibility studies, project d~ign or corntraction of faciliti~ for groundwater storage p:ojects; caps fusibility studies at $200,000 and consmiction projects at $50 million; priority given to projects with avaihble third-party funds (excluding CVP Restoration Fund); no less than 40% of funds in subaccount to be expended for studies, pwjects and facilities within watersheds of Cenlral Bay/Delta Multi-Purpose Water Mgmt. Program Provides funding (subject to appropriation by the Legislature) for projects identified in the CALPED EIR/EIS as a Stage 1 Action; $17 million for treatment facilities or to rek:cate discharge facilities for agricultural drainage. $40 million to control waste discharges contributing to low dissolved oxygen, $120 million for fish screens in the Delta. $40 million for permancm barriers in the Delta, $17 million for controlling abandoned mine drainage and S16 million for p~rn~n~nt batzinc nt Grantlin~ Canal. 2SO million Interim Reliable Water Supply and Water Quality Infrastructure and Management Program Loans and grants (subject to appropriation by the Legislature) for programs or pwjects located outside the Delta including: new or expansion of existing groundwater storage and recovery projects, for acquiring rights to use storage in existing reservoirs, for facilitating improved water treatment, water' transfers and exchanges for water supply and Quality improv:ra~n~ and for start-of-the-art agricultural water conservation programs; priority given to projects that: Can bc completed prior to March g, 2009, provide n~ar-mffa benefits, improves water quality and protects water levels at San Luis Reservoir, includes public-private partnerships and are sponsored by a public agency with water supplies that ax~ being or would b~ i'mpacted by Dclta-rolated shortages and water quality degradation. Southern California Integrated Watershed Program (SAWPA) Provides funds (subject to appropriation by the I..~gislaturc) for improving and rehabilitating the Santa Aria River Watcrshcd thxough watt' u'eatment, cons~'vation, flood protection and wat~ management prograna. 180 million 235 million Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watershed Program P~ovides funds (subject to appropriation by the L~gisiature) for improving and rehabilitating the Lak~ Elsinorc and San Jacinto Watersheds and the water quality of Lake Elsinore. million Water Recycling Program Provides grants (subject to appropriation by the I~gislature) and loans for public agencies to build facilities to produce and deliver recycled water; ~ransfnra unallecated funds from prior bond acts (approximately $70 million) imo new program; (:0% of funds to be spent in six-county area of Southern California; contains language to encourage the SWRCB to expedite the review and processing of agreements to carry out puq3osns of program and provides for profess report to Legislature. 40 million Water Conservation Program 155 million Provides grants and loans (subject to appropriation by the Legislatoro) to bulld and/or improve infraatructurn to conserve water used for both urban ($30 million) and agricultural Association of California Water Agencies - Since 19 Y 0 purposes (~5 million) and groundwater recharge facilities ($30 million); provides grants for projects in economically-disadvantaged areas for the r~pair, mplaceraent, restoration or rehabilitation of existing wa,~r distribution systems ($60 million); transfers unallecatod funds from Proposition 204. FLOOD PROTECTION BENEFITS Floodplain Mapping Program Provides funds (subject to appropriation by One l~gislature) to assist local land use planning to avoid or reduce fatore flood risks by mapping newly identified floodplains and revising outdated maps. Flood Protection Corridor Program Provides grants to !oval agencies (subject to appropriation by the Legislature) for the acquisldon, restoration, enhancement and protection of real properly for flood protection. agricultural land preservation and wildlife habitst protection; ~marks $I million for technical assistance to cities and counties; earm~ks $5 million for the City of Santen for flood pwtection projects. ' $ 5 million 70 million Delta Levee Rehabilitation Program Funds the D~lta Leven Maintenance Subvention Program ($15 million) and special flood protection projects on specified Delta islands ($15 million). Flood Control Subvenfions Funds slato's shah of the nonfederal costs of local flood protection projects authorized as of January 1, 2000, in specified counties; also contains language indicating that the slato's share of nonfederal costs of projects adopted and authorized after January I, 2001, shall not exceed that portion of nonfederal costs authorized punuant to specified provisions in Water Code. Urban Streams Restoration Grants (subject to appropriation by the Legislature) for small flood protection and erosion control projects that typically include work by community conservation cerps. 30 mi!Hon 45 million million Capital Area Flood Protoetion Partially funds slato's ~harc of the costs of fedorally-authorized flood management projects in Sacramento Courtly (subject to appropriation by the Legislature). San Lorenzo River Flood Control Funds slato's share of the costs of fedcrally-authorized flood management projects in the Sam Cruz region (subject to appropriation by the Legislature). 20 million 2 milfion Yuba Feather Flood Protection Program Provides funds (subject to appropriation by the Legislature) for flood protection projects ($70 million) and fish and wildlife enhancements ($20 million) along the Yuba and Feather Riven and the Colusa Drain; allocates $2.6 million to pay for slato's share of levee repairs in Sutter County. Arroyo Pasajera Watershed Program Funds (subject to appropriation by Legislature) flood control projects protecting the California Aqueduct in the area of the Arroyo Pasajcro Crossing. 90 million 5 million If adopted by the voters, the water bond will provide tangible benefits for water in nearly every county in the state. It will make environmental gains without jeopardizing the vitality of California's economy. It will protect our communities from floods, provide cities with cleaner water and increase the supply of water for farming and industry, and for the future of our state. Association of C, aJi{ornia Water Agencies - Since RESOLUTION NO. 00- 03 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION '13, THE SAFE DRINKING WATER, CLEAN WATER, WATERSHED PROTECTION AND FLOOD PROTECTION ACT WHEREAS, Califomia's economic prosperity and environmental vitality is dependent upon the careful management of the state's water resources; and WHEREAS, Proposition 13 will provide 1,000,000 acre-feet of urgently needednew water supplies, particularly crucial in drought years, benefitring the people and industries both within the service boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and throughout the state; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is within the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD); and WHEREAS, Proposition 13 will fund important improvements to water quality and help stabilize water supplies in the Bay-Delta, a vital but fragile estuary and source of ddnking water for more than 22 million Californians; and WHEREAS, Proposition 13 is the largest water bond in California's history at $1.97 billion, and enactment of the measure will provide for greater reliability to the water supplies that fuel the California economy and support millions of jobs; and WHEREAS, the investments provided for in this bond measure will help California prepare for the expected increase of 15 million people by the year 2020 through a variety of clean water, watershed, flood protection and water supply improvements programs; and WHEREAS, if adopted by the voters, Proposition 13 will provide tangible water benefits for people in nearly every city and county in the state, and better protect our communities from the devastation of both floods and droughts; and WHEREAS, the people of Cafifomia have expressed strong support for increased investments in the state's water infrastructure; NOW, TH ERE FORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby supports Proposition 13, The Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection and Flood Protection Act. Resolution No. 00-.__ page 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1 = day of March 2000. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamon~la, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 1'~ day of March 2000. Executed this 2nd day of March 2000, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk