Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-41 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 11-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRC2011-00165, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 81 TREES RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF 33 HOMES (DRC2010-01005) ON 10.35 ACRES LOCATED IN THE LOW-MEDIUM (LM) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN (ESP) ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0227-131-03, 08 AND 62. A. Recitals. 1. Lewis Operating Corporation has filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00165, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of September 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing September 14, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project 10.35-acre site is located on the north side of Base Line Road between Etiwanda and East Avenues. There is a single-family residence on the site that will be demolished with approval of the project. A row of Eucalyptus trees lines the east property line along with a scattering of other trees of various species. The property drains roughly north to south; and b. The site is located within the Low-Medium (LM) Development District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The lots range in size from 8,144 to 14,103 square feet and average 10,142 square feet, which is above the minimum required lot size of 7,200 square feet and average lot size of 10,000 square feet; and C. North of the site is the Pacific Electric Trail which is zoned Open Space (OP); and, south, (across Base Line Road), east and west of the site are existing single-family residents which are zoned Low-Medium (LM) Residential. d. The project was designed to conform to all the development requirements outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan for the Low-Medium (LM) Residential District; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-41 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2011-00165 - LEWIS OPERATING CORPORATION September 14, 2011 Page 2 e. There are approximately 81 trees on the site. The applicant has submitted a Tree Survey Report by a licensed arborist (Sims Tree Health Specialists, Inc.; December 21, 2010), which concludes that the trees will be in conflict with the proposed development and will need to be removed. The project will be required to replace the Eucalyptus windrow along the east property line (planted 8 feet on center) along with the two trees per lot and the required street trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The proposed design or improvements are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The project is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant-to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-41 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2011-00165 - LEWIS OPERATING CORPORATION September 14, 2011 Page 3 d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. 1) Approval is for the removal of 81 trees related to the development of a 10.35 acres site located on the north south side of Base Line Road between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 0227-131-03, 08 and 62. 2) The Eucalyptus windrow along the east property line shall be replaced with a new Eucalyptus windrow planted 8 feet on center with 5-gallon sized trees, of a species approved by the Planning Director. 3) A Burrowing Owl Survey shall be preformed prior to the approval of a clearing or grading permit. 4) A 30-day Nesting Bird Clearance Survey shall be performed if any trees are removed between March 1 st and August 31 st. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF TH OF RANCH CUCAMONGA 11 BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: I\ Jame . Troyer, AICP, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-41 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2011-00165 - LEWIS OPERATING CORPORATION September 14, 2011 Page 4 I, James R. Troyer, AICP of the of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September 2011. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ,. WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: OAXACA ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTT18806, DRC2010-01005, and DRC2011-00165 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTT18806, DRC2011-01005, AND DRC2011-00165 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18806 AND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2010-01005 Applicant: LEWIS OPERATING CORPORATION Initial Study Prepared by: Tabe van der Zwaag Date: August 17, 2011 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /initials Non-compliance Air Quality All construction equipment shall be maintained in good PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: 1 of 12 Mitigation • ResponsibleMonitoring Implementing • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB[)daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMIO emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 2of12 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating,air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga BO CID Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices(i.e.fireplaces/hearths)in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources A Burrowing Owl Survey shall be performed prior to BO B Review of plans A/C/D 2/4 approval of a clearing or grading permit. A 30-day nesting bird clearance survey shall be PD B Review of plans D 2/4 performed if any trees are removed between March 1s' and August 31'. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The project must comply with all rules that assist in BO C During A 4 reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance Construction with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil- stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 3of12 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible . . g of Method . Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance The construction contactor shall select construction BO C During A 4 equipment based on low-emission factors and high Construction energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 BO C During A 4 minutes. Construction Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in BO C During A 4 lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where Construction feasible Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with BO C During A 4 peak-hour traffic Construction Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported BO C During A 4 and encouraged for construction crew. Construction The proposed project will comply with the updated Title BO C Review of Plans C 2 24 standards, including the new 2010 California Building Code (CBC), for building construction if any building interior improvements are required. In addition, the project would be required to comply with the requirements of Minimization Measure GCC-1,including measures to incorporate energy efficient building design features. The project would be required to comply with the PD/BO/CE A Review of Plans C 2 requirement of Minimization Measure GCC-1, including measures to increase water use efficiency Data available from the California Integrated Waste CE A Review of Plans C 2 Management Board (CIWMB) indicates that the City of Rancho has not achieved the 50 percent diversion rate. The proposed project would be required to comply with Minimization Measure GCC-1, including measure to increase solid waste diversion, composting and recycling. 4of12 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action tot Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date linitials Non-Compliance Vehicles that are used and purchased within the project BO C During A 4 site shall comply with any vehicle and fuel standards that Construction the ARB adopts. New products used or serviced on the project site shall BO C During Review A 4 comply with future ARB rules and regulations. of Plans Construction and Building materials shall be produced BO A During A/C 2/4 and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Construction Materials"such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code BO A During C 2 Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any Construction combination of: Increased insulation Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored"cool"roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 5of12 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy BO/PD BIC/D Review of plans A/C 2/3/4 appropriate for the project and include the following: & studies Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, deal flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. ■ Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. CE A Review of Plans C 2 Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading,the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. 6of12 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible g of Method . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /initials Non-Compliance • Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report,with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal PD B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and PD B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. 7of12 Mitigation . . of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report ND 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for PD D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transferto an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho PD D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,v emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,, construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,,emissions. 8of12 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to issuance of grading permits,the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California,and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (name/date) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 9of12 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a BO B Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 10 of 12 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance Construct a continuous sound wall at least seven feet PD/BO B/C/D Plan Check & A/C 2/3/4 high along Base Line Road that wraps around the west During property line of Lot 33 Construction Provide R-13 fiberglass insulation and 1/2"drywall. BO B/C/D Plan Check& A/C 2/3/4 During Construction Install all double pane windows. BO B/C/D Plan Check & A/C 2/3/4 During Construction All floors shall be carpeted except kitchen and baths. BO B/C/D Plan Check & A/C 2/3/4 During Construction Add STC 26 glazing to all second floor rooms with any BO B/C/D Plan Check & A/C 2/3/4 view south and/or east from Lots 1 through 30. During Construction Add STC 34 glazing to all second floor rooms with any BO B/C/D Plan Check & A/C 2/3/4 view of Base Line Road on Lots 31 through 33. During Construction Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 5:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Construction or grading.noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 11 of 12 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible g of Method . Implementing Date/initials Non-Compliance The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as earlyPD C During A/C 2/4 as possible in the first phase. construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A 4/7 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site),then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD-Planning Director or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds FC-Fire Chief or designee 6-Revoke CUP 7-Citation i:\planning\final\ceqa\mmchkist-revl2A-06final.doc 12 of 12