Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011/08/16 - Agenda Packet ACTION AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY AUGUST 16, 2011 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: Lou Munoz Ray Wimberly James Troyer Donald Granger Alternates: Frances Howdyshell Richard Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca CONSENT CALENDAR NO ITEMS SUBMITTED. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:00 p.m. (Mike/Tasha) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00352 - GENSLER FOR CHASE BANK - A proposal to demolish an existing retail building of 6,600 square feet and construct a bank of 4,207 square feet with remote drive-thru ATM kiosks within an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, Terra Vista Community Plan (TVCP), located at 10598 Base Line Road at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Base Line Road - APN: 1076-481-35. Related file: Pre-Application Review DRC2011-00041, Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00683, and Uniform Sign Program Amendment DRC2011-00668. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 - Replacement or Reconstruction. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM #64 AMENDMENT DRC2010-00668 - SIGNTECH ELECTRICAL ADVERTISING FOR CHASE BANK - A request to amend Uniform Sign Program #64 for Terra Vista Village, an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, Terra Vista Community Plan (TVCP), located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Base Line Road - APN: 1076-481-25 through -35. Related file: Development Review DRC2011-00352. 7:20 p.m. (Mike/Carlo) HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00645 - LASZLO VASS - A request to construct a single-family residence of approximately 2,500 square feet and a second dwelling unit of approximately 1,150 square feet (640 square feet livable) on a 15,418 square foot parcel in the Low (L) Residential District, located at the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive approximately 260 feet west of Carnelian Avenue - APN: 0207-022-56. DRC ACTION AGENDA August 16, 2011 Page 2 7:40 p.m. (May/Willie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00356 - GIRON ENGINEERS INC. - Design Review of a proposed retail commercial center consisting of 3 buildings totaling 11,588 square feet on 1.08-acre of land within the Specialty Commercial District (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Klusman Avenue. APN: 0208-153-12, 0208-153-13, 0208-153-24. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2007-00476, Tree Removal Permit DRC2010-00943, Uniform Sign Program DRC2010-00944, Variance DRC2010-00941. 8:00 p.m. (Tom/Willie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP - SUBTT18819 - WATER MILL HOMES - The proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: Development Review DRC2011-00629, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629 - WATER MILL HOMES - The design review of 16 homes associated with the development of Tentative Tract 18819, the proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres of land into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: SUBTT18819, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith August 16, 2011 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00352 - GENSLER FOR CHASE BANK - A proposal to demolish an existing retail building of 6,600 square feet and construct a bank of 4,207 square feet with remote drive-thru ATM kiosks within an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, Terra Vista Community Plan (TVCP), located at 10598 Base Line Road at the northeast corner of Valencia Avenue and Base Line Road - APN: 1076-481-35. Related file: Pre-Application Review DRC2011-00041, Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00683, and Uniform Sign Program Amendment DRC2011-00668. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 - Replacement or Reconstruction. Design Parameters: The project site is located within a shopping center of approximately 556,000 square feet (12.8 acres) that is approximately 884 feet (east to west) by approximately 884 feet (north to south). The shopping center is comprised of thirteen (13) buildings with a combined floor area of approximately 135,000 square feet. Of the 13 buildings, seven (7) of them are contiguous to each other and form a single 'strip' that is generally located at the northeast corner of the site. The other five (5) buildings are single-tenant pad buildings or multi-tenant buildings which are located along the street frontage along the south and west sides of the site. The specific location of the project site is at the southeast corner of the shopping center near the intersection of Base Line Road and Valencia Avenue. The area of work is presently developed with a 6,600-square foot retail building occupied by Terra Vista Animal Hospital and a medical office. With the exception of a daycare facility at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Valencia Avenue, the shopping center is bound on all sides by single-family residential development. The zoning of the center is Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, Terra Vista Community Plan. The zoning of the properties to the north and east is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District, Terra Vista Community Plan. The zoning of the properties to the south is Medium and Low-Medium (LM) Residential District, Terra Vista Community Plan. The zoning of the properties to the west is Low (L) Residential District. The applicant, on behalf of Chase Bank, proposes to demolish the aforementioned building and construct a bank of 4,207 square feet (Exhibits D and G). The new building is proposed to be plotted near the west side of the project site. The bank will be conventional in design/layout with the exception of the location of the drive-thru automated teller machines (ATMs). Instead of having a conventional drive-thru lane that wraps around the building to a set of ATMs located at the side of the building, this proposal will have the ATMs located separate from the building at remote kiosks at the northeast corner of the parcel. The drive-thru lane will also serve as an alternate exit for customers. A set of ATMs for pedestrians will be provided inside a vestibule near the entrance of the building. The proposed building will generally match the other buildings within the shopping center. Key features include a raised tower element at the main entrance of the building, a series of projections with arches and columns on the south and north elevations, and a colonnade along the north side of the building. Details that will be incorporated into the design include exposed rafter tails, storefront glass on the north and south elevations, wainscots, and a combination of horizontal and curvilinear parapets with prominent cornices. In response to comments presented by staff and the discussion by the Planning Commission during a Pre-Application Review workshop held on March 9, 2011 (DRC2011-00041), the applicant has incorporated a quatrefoil vertical and vine trellises on the east elevation, and most significantly, a tower element at the east elevation that will serve as a focal point for the building. The architecture of the ATM DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2011-00352 — GENSLER FOR CHASE BANK August 16, 2011 Page 2 kiosk similarly incorporates the details/features, finish, and materials present in the shopping center including the use of columns that match those located throughout the shopping center. The southeast corner of the site (northwest corner of the intersection of Base Line Road and Valencia Avenue) will be reconstructed with new landscaping and decorative walls. A 6-foot high by 60-foot long wall will be constructed along the east side of the ATM drive aisle. This wall, along with proposed shrubbery, will serve to screen the drive aisle, ATM kiosk, and parking area as seen from Valencia Avenue and mitigate any potential glare caused by the headlights of customers' vehicles that utilize the drive aisle at night. Where it is not possible to preserve the existing landscaping, new landscaping, including trees will be installed following the completion of the project. Mature landscaping comprised of numerous trees, shrubs, and ground cover located in the public parkway and at the west side of the site will remain in place. Although access to the project site from within the shopping center will be revised, no new access points to the shopping center are proposed. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. Staff recommends the addition of decorative tile work within the arched area on the west elevation to match the decorative tile work applied on some of the other buildings within the shopping center. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. The light standards shall not exceed 15 feet in height. This height includes the base, pole, and the fixture and is measured from the adjacent finished surface or finished grade. 2. Any new groundmounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. 3. All downspouts on all elevations of the building shall be routed through the interior of the building. 4. The new trash enclosure proposed at the north side of the project site shall be constructed per City standard. 5. All signs shall comply with the applicable provisions of the City's Sign Ordinance and Uniform Sign Program #64. DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2011-00352 — GENSLER FOR CHASE BANK August 16, 2011 Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed and accepted the proposal as submitted. They concurred with Staff's recommendation to add decorative tile work 'within' the arched area on the West Elevation to match the decorative tile work applied on some of the other buildings within the shopping center. The applicant agreed to do this and comply with all policy issues discussed in the Comments report. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith tw c - -- — I }i ` ■ 1 1 gm' II : , y . e .,c ! C., o N r x 1111! V CG @ i: #Q d ..11 tW.: N NM cp 4 1, Q F p 1 A i Q Q C !i 1 € @_ Q r 1 I El.-Ai ciCr' O d @ 0 4 tu R, W W !Iitl ;°£h. iili a ° :!i Z z F ti S 1 Y 3 S • 1,pp Z P P $ i S 1 4 1 a b N C 3f P ° I 1 1 i • ■ ! , , i } , . .. t , ... ( m 0 4 - 6R { ∎- it ((// Eli_ Ei r ■■ .i u + � o y� I .w. z` F cs v } W Wi Jv _.. -_ Viii : -- o -■ IP II ' 1 1 I 1 .. ■.; c ! , 1 t F 14 3 " IN it E F. f in < •E 7 11 li • Aqr?"1141-11 ii ! .iggg gra t , - - ,. . ,... . . . _ I fi r WA: 2 Q II U CP 8 EL' j _ piCilf1P 4 / 1 tigil ; i 1; 1 • i ! 2741i .t. t 1,8 8 i g, gt cu'Y 1 i i g u' - § sui rl • i 041. 1 4 11 Lu_ 0 0 i Lo i ! V+ ;' ,ki, i:.• 1. .,-- 4, 4 4 4 'N 1 - 3 ..-- (.------ ' , / / 4 ,. ________ . . 4 , illit Mil i , '-•-— , . . / . "1.. " . a- 1111111 7- , - -- III f 7 \ -- 9: ... .■ . ., . . . : LH . ... . *„.... .,.. „... . . r . 1 : - a or ANNE, ■ Ns 1.1 z z - a o ■= a > § so w -.1 5, WF I--., Cl). CC. Q.1 0: wY ZX s - P amIIM. p ,. Li; 1111 .• LI v Li , 1 154 N . i W -"— ...■ e 'SW 1 Li t t : I * t r Ln ,-,,, II .6 - ' - < 'E' ;1 r-;',' II € vpri .... C4 T.;.",. 1 3 e! I . 6? IM1 r i n e; g ti ;If kilt g II :cc ' _. -- _ ' 7E61 / i i 11 ; (11 I lii:1 ip 0 ill f t II I I ,ITx R ....I cW 1,q 04 a IL. cn a-: cNt r- 1 . - O § II 1, .-- :: ., -., 1:-.- `,.' 1 I' ., i. * .."' g, ..):•: - .. .. i •, ..., 1 1 .,..• . 14 5A 0 5 , - IF-'' . .. • to • ,,,, . ,....,: .... . ... . ..•, ,.. , - •P,';7 ,,,:. cn t . ' - • § ,: •oz..,. „ .,, sC ■ . to i. ... 140. ..' 111411 I I , .■ Ili S $ / 1 p Cg 5.t Iv.,'', ..:,-t.gt . . ,•,;:! i _ . ., .. . . . . •c,'• .."*,.. . .. e" P . . . . ... . - . , - 1 1 . • I . 1 J J 3 u, D. a co u) . 0 z a. > , < - io. fF4t DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith August 16, 2011 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM #64 AMENDMENT DRC2010-00668 - SIGNTECH ELECTRICAL ADVERTISING FOR CHASE BANK - A request to amend Uniform Sign Program #64 for Terra Vista Village, an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, Terra Vista Community Plan (TVCP), located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Base Line Road - APN: 1076-481-25 through -35. Related file: Development Review DRC2011-00352. Background: The proposed Sign Program Amendment is requested for two (2) revisions. The first revision is to incorporate the proposed bank that will replace an existing multi-tenant pad building at the southeast corner of the existing shopping center. The bank will be operated by Chase Bank and will include a set of ATMs located separate from the building at remote kiosks at the northeast corner of the project site. The second revision is to add groundmounted convenience signs to direct vehicle traffic, identify the ATM kiosk, and provide applicable warnings. The remainder of the Sign Program, including the construction and design requirements for wall signs; category definitions, i.e. "Major Tenant," "Minor Tenant," etc.; sign restrictions, and tenant responsibilities will remain unchanged. Note: based on the floor area of the proposed building, the bank is classified as a "Submajor Tenant (4,000 — 9,999 square feet)." Design Parameters: Revision No. 1: The bank building will have three (3) wall signs that will be located on the east, south, and north elevations. This wall sign will be comprised of a logo and text; the maximum height dimensions for both will be 31.625 inches and 24 inches, respectively (the maximum height of sign permitted for this category of tenant is 36 inches). The overall length of the combined sign will be approximately 14 feet. The logo and text will have a depth of 7.75 inches and 5 inches, respectively. The overall area of each sign will be approximately 37 square feet (the maximum sign area permitted for this category of tenant is 75 square feet). Consistent with the other signs within the shopping center, the text of the sign will be fabricated channel letters, while the logo will be a box. The colors and fonts will be the trademark colors of the bank. No monument sign is proposed. Revision No. 2: The amendment adds several convenience signs. These signs will be for the purpose of directing vehicle traffic (directionals), ATM identification, or warnings. None of the ground-mounted signs will exceed 4 feet in overall height per the City's Sign Ordinance. All of these signs will incorporate the design motif utilized by the bank. The majority of the Sign Program will be unchanged; therefore, staff has no concerns that the changes will unduly affect the existing tenants or render their corresponding signs non-compliant with the Sign Program, nor will the changes to the Sign Program alter what will be required for signs for future tenants. Generally, the Sign Program will continue to comply with the standards and guidelines set forth in the Sign Ordinance. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None. DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2010-00668 — SIGNTECH ELECTRICAL ADVERTISING FOR CHASE BANK August 16, 2011 Page 2 Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: None. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. The applicant is advised that any future changes to this Sign Program will require an application and fee to amend this Uniform Sign Program for review and approval by the Planning Director and/or the Design Review Committee. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The project was approved as presented. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith • -C ; ! r $ I . r1111\ I � \ _ ƒ /§! - 222«2 ) I (|�I �| - � % { f§ § \ ! ! �� g'p ii // � 1 0 \ /- { ; a ga ; ! ) I! 4.1<4.1 , ! # :} ) ® © = I 9I _\ ( ca °�i _ a - - - ) ; _al ID l ` ` /�) _ ! | F,nRg �� - m . . § \ § I § \ \ k m re,- \ ( ° C IS K Li, „, S f .1_ / 9 -.-- - - T 1 7w 2 \ r!c � � P I / LLI» ,� \ % — CD 4' ƒ • « 6 ■ ,iNi MI q / \ S y �iii CID a° \ / �/ § _ ° .� ( _. e Z. _ ■ �\ i§ § \ \ . min r § . . II & .a . w ? sN. § j i ■.: 1 ® 0 q _ ■ � � \ \ ' 4 r , ! - - . �» -- - zz #] 55 e §§ rii\ t " o en' 10 El IE V o �'u m 9 u ~ :_W set y o ` o~ ao II;L �' ¢ °o SFg; a uni d is _ l0`'` u :� o 44444 Q o one yY ! C mqm Ok a o= C ` a f £ N li` c v, °u •, p o :0; a56 gE E Q ,�./�'�' Bw 0o • o ace 0 - s �$ _ . Wet - m=� oyUOw 44444 rj Sg eg 0 II �. m J ts* i f N U MM�� 1 f .�I" z 0 P (4 al W g I I t IC 0 0 9 () ii ri Cii Zo co 2 o ct P ® 4 La J 1 7, ® S O M N P E ! \ t n . § | . ) \ _ U ` � � \ , r , f- ««< \ C g !i ; j §_ _ �/ C7 41 l {& / : : § \ «air, \ } _ in$ _ -, : ; � : .1<<<< » - ! a R : : l , E! , ` i ` )ƒ� / / $ § \ §� tn II• . . . jI . cm \:. ¥ a \ - � ,, (2 \ k. . . . i tiC j=\ \�Cr Ca !0- _ cn<0-C @ ( a1-J � i 2 [ , ] ) ( , § �__ co, ( \ / ( } II ezi 0 <,'. I—LLI CJ}__ _ \ \ : (\_§ \;/ §.2( ) \ § § \() !: '-E - _ 4D ` \ {\},\\§ \ \ i z cc ;/Q, :(\ \)| y { �|a(|/7 \§55/!, \ ,,,I,; ¥aft§!_ ;.5:»® 2 ;©R, : !:un.V. 11 :Cr . w ; ,�; !! "U /j(§§( t k[9§ / \§ !� l; . cv a .^#�§ qaq ®_ . ; � _ � a� � � i > llu¢ Pd d I' A 1117:13/441/4\ 14.• Ai g 1 I c..) hq C Ew a =e=^mG °' . Jii � �[ V a o e 2 ?-1-: ` o- o n8£ b to 1 , k eG22 a° u13") °° m Q<<<< _ s $ S 31 wym e 2.).0 II w ° 0 L ? ._ o .._ cc z •nn ■ it J S = _ = W in ti �L ill L ti■n J `Ill III 1 II I/ WASH CC m J m F 0 ., s v o 5 ° t", $mF, ¢z — SFrV ' @:,.z 51 ia E ¢ w E w ° ;;mLL KE a ¢ 3n _~ 2 :12 w ° ¢ ;;C J W = < s w a E b a w -wLi ccc. n ¢ a c=c G .qi kE ¢ m°z o_ - m a J o_ � Aa a Z en o a _ ° y y a ° j C of °p Q °i °a. 0 Z J o a a - < ._ ¢m= � o J st d a J M < ec- cr ~Y. `s° Z W �/ 0 2 Z o i o o � s o -ra y,_ a ao . Q .0 W o- %— ' c o z o of lei W W �� - J cr H Cr S i 0 111 a I���i�� I J W C 0. Ja o .°..LL m W � "2' xE co om wag < 0 2 o a x 1 g W= l ESw ¢Owe m¢ `- F t w _ ¢ y, H • 0§. H33 o i Z E 2 keg pit' r�p J =ry �E+_ = o rrW Ca m €° E" ¢k ° m c ac i Jo § <2o 2,-,' E � om = OV WU mho 4 5 b5 as on len 6: 4D HIn°A 'S °` q y<9'trilliN v m `! 3 3 O�� U l ? ° < 1<<c °`ai C e�E c x F. e J zom i v .e o 55z $gs5y ez d o • m o B �. u § N n p pi €'e z°c. 'j �i V m 1 m O N U O N 4 4 4 4 4 J 6 E° a s 2 S N p'N Y O Q= S J O Wg 2 U w a Q Q w Q N Cr) d'-0- 1-W C Q y 0 y N0 Jw-O 2 - O-YOU U- O w 2>��c�d a6LL� 3m�- cam 2.iv 2LL �L YLL Li, Z O Uo 2C fN2Q c"'O 0w'cc cm QN o0 2N >O J p a¢Li!a oc Q N 6 m U O LD p m 0 Y¢O ¢> Q :5>2 ¢ J p L p¢ ¢N o J V Op Qww ¢Op 1—w O p^ ON o1 u]W 3u-co F N , a N y d G w 3 6[V cm jZ i O N p¢ Q �Uw ui ONJ J NN Q p .2ti NN ¢3 oa a 2 Jz 22 2 wma LLw LLo°J LLw o MC/3.161'3J axia aw<E z = - Z °n cp ,-x 1. N N 2 0 0 0 Z U U N Z Z LL O I ¢,u 2 Q O O Q 2 w Q Q Q N O Q w w N 2 '.LL LL 0 O 3 > a 2 Z a d 2 N n. 2 • N ri < Lei 0 r ao 0 ii o o © O a W 6 1 ira ;: - . r ' ;:ti 81"ngirr 1;.. 'i ■ ' U CC • W P. w o� G W . -, = o 5 © O ¢N = Vr J o z Z L. 6 Z La u _ m p 0 D O W W to z O Co I II S J IL as y h 1 y U O 5 CC Fv, N 0 S : r ® La-W 2 O a¢ x U. o � ° an: w I a °„ m ° hi m > E y yO� c n Q .� m ` e n ¢ m °c' °rill\ a.n w o la Tr •— - o Eo �m 8 my << = o m CC) g = q N c m M o m a /J U E° NyC E oC€ ryP _♦ 3 uy G m-ce OnUOVI \14444 V V ' G3 6 S co cc O N p- rO = x n YI QLL Z J 0 U Q6 O 6OWQNN MHO .--en Yh a JN Lys N m Y o w-O Z N O O_Y U U_ O LLI Zucc o d 2?C- 0N1- ymdm ZLL f',O LT in2LL�m02Hw SC.0 ��QQ Zy ¢0 ZN Ow Zoou- N2c c' C'JO QO 00 YO LU p Q ~ 6 w d 6 2 Q m 0 co W d K o 2 =__,= CU Q CD Co o` ¢ww¢0w0_ 2 oLL o ¢ �� o e 2 0cc I-2 o cn} m 1-m W N v �O�I-w O02 w p2z 0o d Cz'J m >I_ w ct O06 CC J x Q 2.-1-0 15°- m~ 2 ui 22J0 Vwi O cc I- 22Y W w QOm J_) wo vSi 20 CO CO <33=QZy<2 Cz22 zakm< zw ° o zoo zw Q 0Z_W ,n NNw d=Q2 ZH 1- 1- z tn5 ZH H H c"N 2 0 0 0 Z o U "22u- O x Q w Q Q O O Q 2 w Q Q QNa C w w NZ _ flw O CD .=..- a2 z z as n d5 04 of v in CD N m 0 N D ' d O C u W U 3L>• �$ � ?y am m W U a m e" S_ 1 — .0-.E 0 >� L. n o 0- W E Q a LE Q N = V J Z_ o = 2 O C Z LL m .. W UL >. B W I I = „it'd" 2 h J U Z N c P;L • n N CM Z ICI d L 7 H r I 2 1u m C = 6 : N ao N .0 a ;n; ��° , �a Ith n A n a bye C " � ° E as«< a p °�io]$ o- 1 C' O m y n m o N £n 0 X O p!g_y5 j Of la cc v S 11 �! A p' ¢ O N U O iq 4 4 4 4 4 t;i Cl E 5 e cC O Y H O W. =0 2 ia,NY1-w GLL ZJU' d JOO`O H C.LLa H6Or62N dq0� NIZUQ yt 2 S w N m W N O z c^O O N}U U N O w N _w1-,-cYi a�z_'0 3rn�- timam z� I-:'4 Y¢ 7cc LLO¢mo�1-m 2d O m0c26 ZN cc cn ZN 2< N 5 cc (J w N O N N O O O YO Ow 0226OQ ¢6co u>to w V O1- a-, y~j 2'J s3 Ja o��a.- aQ m<aFr wco Qo. ¢c� J Q :.a,��°Cwo3a3 na`' 1 3y za >L.3, am g O o a "a w a m"��d oui<� .W < °¢0 z� say z2 2 z Li O N O S r �Uw W . 2=1 J N N Q Q N20 N co J3 OGZO¢2 222 z it mQ .= w w LL°oJ LLw a o 2 z w N J a a Q?? N N o 2 ♦-c QOww • CS4w J-F.- Z O O 1-N5 I-�LLF•N N Ox o 0 c=U.9 N f l w o wi t Q w ¢Q o o Q 2 w ¢Q QNOQLLwNZ -O UPS-7 d-2 Z Z wwN d2 N M Q N 0 1� W ki O O O © p r— W ti:§2 Dr k>> co 1 J ■ 11 .:: x u a .DC w° 5< 0 II p W 1 6 2 © O V O 2 N = J C-:;:13 w¢c I I 1::: 0 S 0 ,d 7 2 y N Q 2 �F z z h p:Q acs U. W VJ •3 �1NIC-_�_>-�. y`j(rcul+�l.1 `r:.�i y cc J 'a ■,11 , ? az 0 o Ls; ® WE O = W s a _ D.E LL 2 0 ry v A. N _ to E I` k E r. doxH _� R r \I % et1 t i E aaQaa Q g s-..0 4 q '.°n C r ° € n = E a m '°o tio 3 = m o C a c m a$ `Ky `.�r •g Y p pet o no— 0 P c o u N " a mt tr) = F da p-z o h LS p v; <<<<c . ` ( n o 41 cc a wZ r u o 6 g m Ili cc Se °m ¢h Illi 5 iR So L3 0 ki E° 2 s = SK = Y1-2 0 ` O 06 w2 p O O x U m y c ix, ` Z z d � ¢w - W'¢N 0 `" d > > amp a a io V ` pzwi uE C C w0 - Q ` J .u¢O¢ m ` W ao�`mom "'ami lU d U w w U w O p a¢Za U Q Z U ~ y O W¢p¢ W N QNU w5¢� iiii 2 e wiz•• < _py II p w x36ow000= aim IN Nic 86- W = W r... .2 11 • 111 1 . > o W D 11 CO e LL S°i m -- W HION31 13315 VO.0/C-601 311/1d.V/Eil 301/41:19 W083.1H013H VO.911 100tlO NN10HS-NON 2h-1' 30VUO WOH33ONWVJ1O•Z l Fo0 CC x m CO a=I L.: :=:: o •yl O .9 30tltl0 WOHd 30NWtl310.901 O .E1 9u0040 d01-1H913HVO2 l )114 !C i �3 \ _ ' «4« § | 2 { r \} 22 / : . ) \ )| / : , _0.cn| / ! , _-� : _ / /! {� U, - \ , & : : ! ««g " � ` \ ! ` I } ) . .7 A • ` : w■ / } =5 . < § �- e - § § ; ` § $ \ \ ^ § } p . cm % [® ■ ) }� \ \ . Y.,t. \\) o® ~ \\(2 2§\ x=� ,� ![\ , , §/2! ■ / ■ 4 \\ _ / t- ,,_ tilt ii. ■—N. » ___m a sop 30 d01-11.1913H VO 21.l 1,11M _c tk I § ! „ ) ƒ � IN\ U ] r .+ e I _ ' <<<< j \ _ / § / ! ` �f g`/ i 1 22 / \8 2,}j . 2 / / / CO / # xt -, : ; , : / <1,1.1<C1 . : ; H a r q7 § t �k \ a § ! \ j/\\ ma* a= ` r. §:: ! '�« CI /)]§ \ / - \}( (%) )2, !a m _ _ ; � § j[ o 6 co &) - ) ) �}\}\(; /(! .Co , 0 �$!r \ 7; ( ® :2= : k - , ;! != =c ` � \\)i;(! ;;\ , CO I ! E E \ / 4 §/§ ( \\k(2(/)( 2 oi CD 0 0O 0 `\ow` ■ . . ; a ...°\ e } . . � / $ \ \\}} k 6 a w /§ ry t c S` ° I - ° - ' w:- LIE Irillik\ J: '` 1 44 � C t � 6 U e ei ° == :r A E O a int F<<< g`" (fit 8 fir3 s m o : . J L O = Iwo €ooz® tO3 L H O ..o c .6 z° sd � a m°� o �nuo � QQQ 3 €^ 3e : of Z F2- W W O N.-. UU Za o > NO U O mc0 H m w 00 N� 6 W gw mWZ W z 22 a' N W m O K LL m>3 m w maI OW o a WmmvM)M a '7n 0 1,7(0_1 w V2- m¢ 2 Z F w m W"m " Z m M re 0 y 1-oo Z _i !niIH =o O� K y 0 Y W Z wFyN.h O z aow WN z wo OUJ 0 W 0 D2y- MDJ N F,n2 ZO U tq O? OW JRa 3tot U mFQYQ y 0-11:0 p'�wW") mm?N Zd(�W �� �yWma ZLL • LL Um5, U� W mOFW>WO1'W wO EI-000m ox mowp0-ow W J ' WZW 1- OKJW- 100 1-0 z J00 00 I-WUOKWWZ_ a Va-WYY~ F- w5CWff)YOZJJ CO ZWwaWQOF- d—m OZ.00w0E J wJ(?a 2 JUJY VaK W=2rozo wcc a'4H-IMEO u.Q m ZJw VOZWOW S K (OV)tw/Jmm(00 4mwc0NWWWW WS2am ~JQJUJJaWOJ�JF ~ =2222=OJ Y22222=522 Z J F O Z_J 0a'm20zzDaU)) . Nw . 022 , Da2 &UUUUU0 . > m , m , , 3333 J_ W N W J Z 6 O N a 4.. N = E G W ca LL 0 Nrwia 6 N W y N y M O n a-I- 0 e. m y 6 z 0 C')Co 3 J C.3 el W^ w utt M I Oi G CC CD Zy U�LU W �I W K LL m = a CD UDO /M .:• _ Z W Z J N U W M N a tC N W Q m y W J �d V LU CO LL O W N O JStZO 1 F. 0,00 Z O O J J 1_ 1-Z LL›.N U C • COm1W- OM U wm V>¢JU W N y CC, J W 0 o J O M=w ¢~ w a 8 a 0 2 2 N yOZ so .1,u 0 ,..... -__ n_,M 2 -Em VUi w w j W N ' Z '- °o� zz �dcYioz ¢ W O a 0- H 1-i O Y 'L W z r •' . y a 2 N J Y 0 6 a y 0 H z # o 03 5 9 amo�„my_w m=F OF `X & w ' 3 zFw cm=0 C'U =1°.02 -.CZ y '[ ' II °w a az c�wx a J>i3 ¢ °O x¢= W t O , o ui ? z x°a- >m2 LLmc�� 2 Q m uyi-3m r •:)C1 LL a = Q H 0 0 V V)a\ N z? ,~y N War w s y o� mFO0-WmFi..�am W3 Sao J Z O . 5 3 O w a m LL N S U' ¢> N w Q O 15 o a m o c ,~z,— a> ▪z m N°Z ¢ r N _,O Q- `� C - 7o U Um26� �mO a0 =Owo ? a3 0 m w 0 LL n a 2 m m 0 U m a • co co Y O y O Z O U in Z a z N a u u N O Q W ' J N 1-` Q O Q a Z N 6 y F w W 0 cn a.CO W J Q O D U U S m J U d'2 U O C O N t¢ LL p M - Q y 1- 0 O O ♦-d Q a d O Q d J J .0H J O m LL O y O W W co.- -1 z 'aoou_��o��= 3 c¢ wiz w* O w mtON U2tQ Z 7t0U i_. Om z W U~�1-' QO¢ N 1- ¢ 6+ Or 6 3 Y J O W Q 4'1 6 0 d LL 2 Ll L. of 6 a mm`Q1-�Kf¢122 ,G31S�a 060 V' FC O W a W M Q Q Q$O'O O y k N N W W W Q`L V = Om02LLJZ a6 oca3 dmF. H O LL zo azz w x w zo E a�3 3d-- x53 a "' Z W TYO OY.�� J_1_-Z_ H J S w 6° f LL co>0 amC-J_' a322 a"'~ ! [ ; Jifh¥ !r' 11h1i \ } ! ! ' <<«< \ § ° �� � � \ \) / §\ , � ; R A f % {/ - / � # _ 0, \ ` 111 G / § ( . . ! _ - � ««< a ! ( h--! 1 � n _ Vim ■| 0,i/rn del ) § S § \ !§ %\ k2 , 0 / ^ / � _ o ! j / ) | -( | E } P Hi > | m \ / ! �� | \ - cC �� �k $ � � � `• �k | , q2§ | 1 _ 0 30 )( • I � ` : °umzren --- ,, / fal"=•-% \ \j� co §) _ _ _ §� =r : J1 0 - / §, 4lq « )§§k , $2 (E7 ������ \ \ - })E(§)§2! ` / - §/ ~� \ - �oz=zi.cz II Hal n )¥ k®-I § - In / 2 i hi i \ ! U , r � | i 49 _ �# c - «<<< | k §; c , ' - , A ' $ ) �ƒ � I 22 / ~ : ; / 1din Ln , . . to ; / # F : _ , ; _ i / / 1! cs i <<<<< { � ! » ! ! | | 2 o CC 0 Mb co ■ o ! - / \} cr o C., kJ ® ww C cIilMa i _ oz<8 cC§ /(\\\ 42 §|){\ _„ 3— ;_\\)\ \ \ . } La, 00 r 1 CV O rii:1j1 a to = 1. ga c n A ea a a. m oa dFN m J p W o TV S V ,3 Q n b�r ads F C x c : w o zo_ o�14 q S c�� n c 6e till,5z 2 EES E z m Upuy 3G m2a` L6NUO IQ' aaaaa P£ E2�S O �i 6 N 4_______ = O a o c_ O IL Q 9 rii \\ t .. 11;:jui:oit; Illtll CO H IIL.__.-JII N V. n fl W,4 1 /( G m}� \Vl O] OC O `�� 1 I ��(� � 0 I\il I I U ~i = 3 m W til I CQ.I =—_ _ N � W Q d ir / — of La a OQ—,•,b r c 'Z G = _ it .y J W LE�M LL J W W n O d W 00 ' ' 3 O = °za r = O W <� CO W V)W = Q• co, Q N N Q CO = LL 0 W W i I t .! O ® 7 W V 2 w W = W J CC � � N -J y a J 0 O I- 1 _ Ih 1 I a O O II -7 0 II II ill 1 m I hi Ws nnnnnn U X [ 3co 1 3 N l(,l j , W_ 5 n I J U IVI 7 M � l m I Q [ 1 1 -,3.6',I —__— —1,P1„6 I__ T V-.I - !\ , $ I : aI ?U : __ § ` �� 1. $/) _ • <<<<< \ (c , ; a - - ± 2 | 'Ti �- ] 22 / � : . 0 k 40 41 % P1 �� nt22 ® 1 ., R4 ° w «g« ! a4,a \ ' :I ei I- yf � .T \ n.§ \/ k ` f i _ Il} \ \ -be / /° ` ca cc ) $ ' \ \ «w- . £ -.0. 1 z ii:ee.."...,,: . k« ƒ §■ ' \\ '\ } \ f f \ yv } � \ \ :4 . I ! I \ tJ /J U o cc 0 vii w in. a Is o _ I� u ILL ' ill co y vo A > c, as� LL�ha 3 . m iEi .. Z E aa<aa a cif o � ` ..,r.k.. *se _ . : w 222 ill .. o ®� _ § ry` _ E Cm0 a EDa . „V 1 JIUI1 co tOg Q y a N n r:E : y,' n o P g U 1 d ¢ { C .. S s . 3t a-= o a 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 V S b S S : ¢w II = a <„ sw II1E r --1i1 j crivi =win�<j 5N60 ,¢0w Sn72 `-'3 w Fam ,.,� cOgrl. .11 .'/1 °s° 6j2 Qymw CriN O!�° °06 ?mQZ �,..aw 5 o Z w ,... w�6 ° O °2 ¢ .� ¢ wy o �� ¢��s •° O 444^^^ _ =¢ 62d p m OK 66 ?CV6i0 , _,y C w am LI w0 Om u a 2� w°my fa 3w�n no S cram cfi S Ya @ s aM0 o acg i't== a _.-._ o i 1s' ' a no.- Et s J wE ill 0 fl w6 =H �m�I i I = a<= I I ow i w� s 1 W- M�. nnn W__ I w <-m U a< I s=d' :: i °F w I W>w h O iii I m i �2 =.- 1 s�b�i ! = ALL = 5 l m� I w ;° ww� 1 .W 6J r --1 ° O c❑ J R.ew uaz,e - �'• —•—•-••• ___ _ ¢awe ar 'rent."' I ww-a 0 el 1 k �¢ 0 �� °mo Hm�a .0-�l ey Lu h o� to �3� ^ LL an Jo w O Sa FLU a LL en r �� ¢° o ° F z d-I w¢ o _- •<O Sb� m C a2 �� Opo' Sit° p Nw ZYH •••• cy ¢Q� K•j 7Qm ° uM _ = r __ LL ate a d ¢dx 6 GG j v6 N G �� W¢m / w,y y O ,i0 ••-\R`G U °d' UVb i it• E 6d m� I [u,y wm n,n ri V h _ a o N ■ ° � w rl ec a CYO s ` 40 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Mike Smith August 16, 2011 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00645 - LASZLO VASS - A request to construct a single-family residence of approximately 2,500 square feet and a second dwelling unit of approximately 1,150 square feet (640 square feet livable) on a 15,418 square foot parcel in the Low (L) Residential District, located at the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive approximately 260 feet west of Carnelian Avenue - APN: 0207-022-56. Design Parameters: The project site is a vacant parcel located on the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive approximately 260 feet west of Carnelian Avenue. The parcel is 15,418 square feet in area. The parcel is generally rectangular in shape with the northeast corner cut-off. The dimensions of the parcel are 203 feet (north to south) at the west property line, 150 feet (north to south) at the east property line, and 87 feet (east to west). The properties to the south and west are developed with single-family residences. The property to the east is vacant. To the north and northeast, following a diagonal alignment, a San Bernardino County flood control channel. The topography slopes in a generally west to east direction. At the west side of the project site the existing elevation is approximately 1,311 feet and falls to approximately 1,308 feet at the southeast corner of the project site. The applicant is proposing to construct a one-story, single-family residence feet, and a detached second dwelling unit. The single-family will have a floor area of approximately 2,500 square and will include an attached 2-car garage. The second dwelling unit will have a floor area of approximately 1,150 square feet and include a one-car garage. Per Section 17.08.030(E)(5)(d) of the Development Code, the maximum size of a second dwelling unit on a residential property with an area less than 20,000 square feet is 640 square feet. Accordingly, the second dwelling unit will have a livable floor area of 640 square feet, while the remainder of the floor area will be comprised of the one-car garage/workshop (455 square feet) and porch (55 square feet). The second dwelling unit will be located at the rear of the property. There will be two driveways and two drive approaches at the west and east sides of the property to provide access to the garages of the main dwelling and second dwelling unit, respectively. Although there does not appear to be an established architectural theme within the neighborhood of the project site, the existing homes in the neighborhood and the proposed main dwelling and second dwelling unit will be compatible. The architecture of many of the existing homes is consistent with homes built generally about the time of the City's incorporation. The most common attributes of the homes in the immediate vicinity are that they are one-story with a front loaded, two-car garage. They have relatively minimal secondary decorative veneers (see attached). Window accents such as decorative shutters and trim are present. Many of the homes have roofs finished with composite asphalt shingles as opposed to concrete or clay tiles. The architecture of both the main dwelling and the second dwelling unit will have similar architecture to the homes in the neighborhood with the exception of the roof material — the proposal is to use flat concrete tiles consistent with City Policy. The proposal includes the use of a stackstone veneer at the base of the posts at the porches and knee braces at various locations along the roof eaves. As the property is generally level, i.e. flat, the maximum depth of excavation and/or fill will be no greater than 1 to 2 feet. The pad elevation of the main dwelling and the second dwelling unit will be 1,310.47 feet and 1,310.37 feet, respectively: This is a marginal difference from the existing grade at both locations of approximately 1,310 feet. At only single-story, the overall height of both structures will not exceed 30 feet as measured from the finished grade. Lot coverage will be approximately 23.6 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2011-00645 — LASZLO VASS August 16, 2011 Page 2 percent; the maximum permissible in the Low (L) Residential District is 40 percent. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major/Secondary Issues: None. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All walls shall be constructed of decorative concrete masonry units such as slumpstone or split-face block or have a decorative finish such as stucco. 2. Removal of Heritage trees (trees greater than 15 feet in height and having a trunk circumference of 15 inches or greater) requires the submittal of a Tree Removal Permit application and fee of $706. Where possible, relocation is preferred over removal. 3. The required front yard setback in the Low (L) Residential District is 37 feet as measured from the curbface. The proposed front yard setback is 32 feet. Although Table 17.08.040-B permits variations of +/- 5 feet, this only applies to residential tract development and not to an individual house. NOTE: At the time of the preparation of this report, the applicant was aware of this correction and was in the process of revising the proposal accordingly. • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Director for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed and accepted the proposal as submitted. There was a brief discussion of the perimeter screening. The applicant requested that instead of a solid wall along the east/northeast property line that he be permitted to construct a combination block wall and wrought iron fence, with a combined height not to exceed 6 feet. The Committee accepted this solution with the conditions that the wall shall be constructed of decorative concrete masonry units such as slumpstone or split-face block or have a decorative finish such as stucco and at equal intervals along this wall there shall be 6-foot high decorative pilasters. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith `.✓:'j'i; eONM JUN 3 0 ZOli :S w.,o E i g E.) r e p eb 1 jG Homes Surrounding Hillside Design Revie , DRC 2111 -00645 8772 Red Hill Country Club Drive APN 0207-022-56 Owner/Builder: Laszlo and Maureen Vass 1 c 4T7"K/yea 7770FH4352 .: \ ° 7735 �N. 7780 ,.- \` .. v'7 S \ �v 7790 :49 S az 7800 y 8710 �f�ct 0 j 7761 \ 7810 i F Pj ` � 71 7775 ; \ S 8661 �c�'<�. 8762 CFr77� \ \�9) 8742 0 %neb RED ILL COON q '1 CLUB n- p n FH4508 y!e - 8•CMLW83-12CL 8660 8670 } d c �6Afip FH4519 • // ° 8731 8741 8751 / 8721 8761 jy/ c, f " FH4572 '; FH4578 N 8661 Q 8712 8722 8732 8742 8752 8762 I ? CAL_E OUEBRADA o 7889 4 _ 4 4 i ? ( ~ 1 61 CMLW63-1261 I i I I Cr FH' 21 ,2 I I AB-6660 P 7900 0 I— .° 7899 a d J 9` t; -I ; — ■ C) -/ 8719 8729 8739 8749 8759 8769 I// - ... c,& �Cr / / ft Cu 7909 126 6 Z- -J . (U 7 919 J „ ` 10 6710 8720 8730 8740 8750 8760 0 ? ,A 9 CALLE CORAZON FH4701 I j( I ; 4 q q 4 t cMLw6342CL 1 AB-6880 I i( Ha71; _ I I yi / 8707 8717 8727 8737 8747 8757 8767 y_ a 7949 / \ 8720 / e' n 1 \ 7966 ° 7957 / / 7869 Camino Predera wsZ- ��; +x'v"i , � _, krcs u. + }', y-4 . � } t T I''fiy��G3y�Li. 14h71.1.'4-t: ;1:404.104*,-.: 4 ve 3 S .et �4rKFt5g n.✓'r'a�r 4: A"s / Y., dC ` �. µ��` { aK.3 fy}rt/C.. • .tt � •.74 yrlFr4a3 ,5 MCC S . � , t j t„ 3 �yt'a rtzf r o � ec r Hti` s +r } a. 't , ' �u ' + z ' r. ^ re z , A4 G - r s a i .--. C 6 G • 'f_ fW..' eN+at 4F y M • t,Ai; OTEI#A-Apro;s6cMc.1.14; 7869 _ l r ,�.ylt z8..bs " Er .,t-*�&b-:+{.s ),�.3 ti', r l' t [. • q: � .� `s.'i -Sn 'T> "aT'4'Y652F. h ,x" ? 3..�-dz.- i441-r ,";.,4 .3,C.- ..:„ _,_.F �'Sy 7879 Camino Predera • r yy » t, ° xc 'v *ki s .. a ! I { 'a.7V '`'yq S. �..• ,.fir; a - n � :#x 1z,—t'- x 3 4 z i s f z r ty.' °u f5 ak l "‘,-;1(-',..-'a,.. . ;` 'e'er P F[T-Rrt 7 y,J ',.^y i . ^"-+ - -'— 4w .. n .t zy�� fC %F m' >.a `7- t E - 1 'r. r v { - ,.^1.7,--,-,7,.Z.,- y1.I✓-'n `fr`y=? ?-� F ` x 5 ,:l'''.74...1•:-. K t • y. i -'< ' .-a v' 4 .': s. ,,1LP d ` ' .2 •.( • 8731 Red Hill Country Club Drive „. • , .r..„ • ...„) „.,-141----dy ' •, . :: It, ...j, 44 , .. tit '''':` . .:44.i..:4e; 4,-. ..-.... ,/,-Cm-42” . •`',-.-. '",g-t`f. `, ".. vi.4.,'Aratt 1 , . w. • ' - • s' . •1 -9 ' A1/4.4„ ,;7342;.--- ,1t4E-11;* -r- cif t- -'•- -r- - , , -10.,„ ,- .,•:-,.-.:,,,,-,,•,:,-4 ,,..--ircititttitt :• •,----'•:- 17 ' • s' 2 --,•• - i./;•••-ti,4,- .- -y._.•:..- ---• : ,,ri F••\-,,,•N%..,:•,,,, -•,...-iy24...:- !..•:,-A• „.„,,, . . , ,, .1 , .c--,- - :;-• -21,:eillirk‘•-• -4 .., \444::._ •' '.-' :_„•,' 4' ' ...11 ; . • ,.--: -404.-44." • ' .,4• ... -7-alt- -.7! 'tia,:i$1„,,,,.... 7. ok --,,,,, 1.{.-.1,3,.....!-- 1----4...--fortii - - --. - Y. . .*?‘::.-;:f7.1 .- - • -4*,.. ' •-14--.14;i44,"(4,.-•" - . ,; .,a)e,&..:4 t.mt s• t4 . .,..,--:•.7- -"f• '• ' .- - .. r ..1:KI-..: •` :;1-F-ift4y21'-1-rSra ‘,Y -.:." ; 1.■.. • : . 1, ,,,e.;-, ,''' • ' ' "...-1 4:-.. .= ..: .. ....:,,, ...-ifk:..4„.v.- . 7,-A ...‘ -if-,,-I-,ty4 ,,,ipSr.-.; -:. . ..- •-....,41.,t4t.,..st;' '../14,117 ;11, 4,7.'re".- ".W... Nt.,:),If; ...,..,‘"1. ,...:.y..■':::. ... !;". .e: .. r Ic‘oc." „../ ,,,,,• '1. .. ,.atig..7±,— 4, , 4...tt:4 — 71: t?,•.?'+,t I. ,t-12:. -'it. ,. - - -,t.•,• Y 4::-. 4: '-'1Et • •<31...,". , - - --::-: ,.1.:- .• .• ' ,-- PM .•r,„ IF. ' A)k,C,c2:1.11?-„ ' ''" .. . :'t. ' ,e'i:' ';' ... C.-g ._ . • ',. r.ii,•,43: ' 4,—- t•-■ • - . ' - --f.;_,•—•...,--1.2,—.±-.-r±as-a• • : .. • •:%-i%.1;;;-,--%-,"sCilits..sfMi.-W.:-45-: ' • te-ticett-mka,...,..-- —,. , ..... . - - ,4 .- •.. 1-.-4, . ., . - . ....:=-74., : . •r, 4.,,t.--4.--v, (-'. ..: . .-.4 .-...2:75:%:::- -ti -..e.rjs...., • •• . ,- +0 '';t , > ..41Vi.:C31:a' ".."-...'b ,N, -• ; ....: t..- y:'' %. ..., ■,11,...i# ,• ni. ..:talai::::>."%cit.:L...4e ... ...t.;St:0'; IC..e..:4117ZIS.' .•Atr ..242:1.3Attear, ,r3. 4),.. 4', 11' ' tf.N.N.0,--JA... at‘Y."..t.frnif-%Al- fttr"CCYCIt.' s 1,Tr.rn• ---- 8741 Red Hill Country Club Drive - tr. • • a r s.en p s ‘‘t ■ ' -• . zr• - - q Atte 4 ). fiL = :J 47.FL-•" t‘A. -sv;4,,, • scH,4 7-0,- -4 "c-` tyt". •.; SextMe --ma. • ,="" 8751 Red Hill Country Club Drive 4 a-,:,„....z''-i iz,i y�,,,, :;3?,,,,,,,,, � ,,`^',,, -c`4 ".s.:nv'_ - '.::w ::fix-mac yxra itu wt; '-tr.",u`. 'g-" i_,I:' 3:;!^. ..icy e' cii.ft' - `'Pty '=2,-;•• . :1..v'_»14%3,L"w-'yY-•ib I -°:+,e' P*4- s 4-- - >:'a,k.1, wry 4 i r}-'t. � ' ^s. i.. r, ''. °° s ,v5. 5 _ ,`"max. "yt rzi.. t" +y Y3 ``'.,2x`sr. ,•afp S. .7 . irrat°X`7 -M:t sat :etiV fi a5 k ] s K"'�' y'�-`� ry .t .2n*x[ "' E Sys o £k .� x yC'r' .>orht f.+, - , + } #s� � a- � '.FZ' r� ]' �.� .r.Se �. i t .'a -4._ r u. r 'r'-�-' ee* ' v�- "'ar'ai e a S rtU 'j ti-_ if M ax a”t 1f a'3i. `Z'- l: :x a S- i, 4 ice^ � to .�"Y� "` "' "F yi, ^i "1"4.1"44k 's r t r a i r- .',may � -tl,W "4,• N +'ham 5�' F 4 t ° ff yy do §y a a ys" '7C r .p'� t 1 Q 'sue- �� J -"'4' "3 9 +°r PI;;; f ,,,Ch M4,. 44 - A .-A-- ki k t...' 4 _ jp� S .i1 GJI Y. 9•r' Z ._ Y K 1...S, _ _ - . .,'. �"'y'a$� ,' 'R ;;;. b1.∎-4 �X: ci a",. .:.. Ems" `v:.'r �Z- A' a"`< ...• -Tr ".rote-9,iv4;,:.: _ ,- 'y.� Y i4 8761 Red Hill Country Club Drive + • ` �.7,4 r 7 -r ..1''.' » .- .:.•:t °fin : retr w :c,,:.,: 4 TMd. H t+w. . 4, >• - MNl)- f£i, S :t;... .-- `i� Min.0 • • y''i.�, f `"R �^ -4'i°. .cwY 'lam. -sa t,�,?. x _-i r =ro .. ,tA # �. . J 45.1{ nI { %C. ,,,; '` �,■ I -+v� N 8"l''. •.5.; fi J d s _ ��� R �h µ'' YX�s'�'"ae$ w-e " l-t.0i''- - d gin(' `�r _, t 1` 13 �.. t +;1 y fax, .. . s { �c3�j4ryry,Sp.gt nt _ r � ,,x " _.4 i ', E m y a,e. �sf `` '+�x � -� �R N.L 8762 Red Hill Country Club Drive a x rsy sue- --'14.t a.c. r ,gs_ k�+< � -:.,., �x �R' �g ; :r.- t� - ra 'y . ax F <W�3 A_:5`ti' s Th ° 4y � � Y� ``` .4 9. ' r4-- 5 wk 'Ct �* At ^c C. T , ' i L zr 7 " y a R.c: Y- a '�,r3 x , . ri x,0' f"' • w' '� �w�Ty�c' ry S'' ALia,n4'.t' ft.c,_ b {1 3+ '! S ryl TXw } �, 4�. k 't y jar _y :• L Fps^+ 3�h r X -;,---;-.)--a•„..;"••• ti i t �.T �i -s- 1? . 1 . "Y tsi{ kc m . e( � � ,,i,„ ,..I .yt '`€ + x : r '."t ,.rte. z F" ^�,�=ae-.,, �.."- , i ' a; '.�" -1 a f ,-rte fe"w.`j t r =`i• "45;:444‘ ;$5;7., '}4:1 " •� DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:40 p.m. Mayuko Nakajima August 16, 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00356 — GIRON ENGINEERS INC. - Design Review of a proposed retail commercial center consisting of 3 buildings totaling 11,588 square feet on 1.08-acre of land within the Specialty Commercial District (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Klusman Avenue. APN: 0208-153-12, 0208-153-13, 0208-153-24. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2007-00476, Tree Removal Permit DRC2010-00943, Uniform Sign Program DRC2010-00944, Variance DRC2010-00941. Design Parameters: The project site is located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Klusman Avenue on a rectangular-shaped parcel of approximately 1.08 acre. The site is zoned Specialty Commercial (SC) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, Subarea 3. The properties to the north are developed with older single-family residences that date back to the 1920's. This portion of "Old Cucamonga" was identified in the General Plan as a potential "Neighborhood Character Area." The property to the east is the historic Cucamonga Service Station, which was built in 1913. The property to the south and west are commercial developments. Background: On October 28, 2009, a Planning Commission Workshop was conducted to review the proposal of a 14,860 square foot commercial center with roof-top parking. At this meeting, the Commissioners were not favorable to the roof-top parking and guided the applicant to redesign the project to provide ground level parking. The Commissioners also asked the applicant to provide the following: • A Master Plan of the parcels east of the project site depicting the bus stop location. • Design the project to be consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Design Guidelines. • Trash enclosure to be relocated away from the adjacent residential development and incorporated into the building. • The tower feature at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Klusman Avenue to be reduced to pedestrian scale. • Incorporate and be considerate of the adjacent locally designated landmark — Cucamonga Service Station. Mitigation measures required by the Cultural Assessment must be incorporated into the project. Proposal: The applicant has re-designed the project and is now proposing a retail commercial center consisting of 3 buildings totaling 11,588 square feet. The buildings are located towards Foothill Boulevard and parking is located behind them. The tower feature was completely redesigned and reduced to a more pedestrian scale. There are two access points into the development that can be accessed from Foothill Boulevard or Klusman Avenue. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for the Committee discussion regarding this project. DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2008-00356 — GIRON ENGINEERS INC. August 16, 2011 Page 2 Major Issues: 1. None. Minor Issues: 1. The applicant has worked hard with staff to address the outstanding issues. The trash enclosure was relocated near the buildings and away from the residential units during the fourth submittal. It created an awkward location only because it was in front of and near the storefronts. Alternatives were investigated for the most suitable location; therefore, staff conducted a meeting with the applicant. The applicant was told by staff that the trash enclosure located in the niche to the north side of the property should be appropriate if it is screened well and is far away enough from the residential units. The concurrence of the Committee is requested. 2. The applicant has submitted a Uniform Sign Program (DRC2010-00944) but it is not complete. The applicant shall address the comments noted in the "Completeness Letter," and come back before the Design Review Committee with a complete and revised Uniform Sign Program. The sign program shall be reviewed and approved before building permits are issued for the project. Policy Issues: 1. Because of the narrow shape and size of the lot, it was difficult to provide the required parking for this development, even with scaling the buildings down in size. Therefore, a Variance application was submitted to request a reduction in the street yard setback by 6.27 feet, within the 25-foot setback as required along Foothill Boulevard. The applicant has demonstrated why the Variance is necessary. 2. The Developer is requesting to pay an in-lieu fee for the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities located at the north property line, instead of the City's requirement to underground. If the developer undergrounds the utilities, he is entitled for reimbursement of one-half the actual cost upon development of the north parcels in the future. It is unknown at this time how extensive the usage of these utilities from the adjacent properties will be. Engineering staff is requesting that the Planning Commissioners review this request and make a determination if paying the in-lieu fee is appropriate at the time of the Planning Commission meeting. Staff recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of this Development Review and Variance to the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: • 1. The Design Review Committee commented that the conceptual plan for the adjacent Cucamonga Service Station as a bus shelter is not appropriate. The islands will be too close to the curb. The Committee hopes that it will not delay this particular project but would like to see alternatives for the gas station in the future. DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2008-00356 — GIRON ENGINEERS INC. August 16, 2011 Page 3 2. The trash enclosure will stay where it is in the north niche of the property. Staff demonstrated that it is approximately 35 to 40 feet away from the residential units. 3. The Committee directed the applicant to complete the Uniform Sign Program and bring it back to the Committee prior to scheduling the Development Review application for Planning Commission. 4. The Committee supports the Variance request and the applicant's request to pay the in-lieu fee for future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities. Since there are so many adjacent residents that would be affected, the Committee agrees that at this time the in-lieu fee may be the best approach. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger • Staff Planner: Mayuko Nakajima DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:00 p.m. Tom Grahn August 16, 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18819 - WATER MILL HOMES - The proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: Development Review DRC2011-00629, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629 - WATER MILL HOMES - The design review of 16 homes associated with the development of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18819, the proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres of land into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: SUBTT18819, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing the development of a 17-lot subdivision located in the 10.6-acre area surrounded by Etiwanda Avenue to the east, Victoria Street to the north, Grape Place to the west, and existing single-family homes to the south. There is an existing single-family house located on the project site; the George and Jessie Johnston home, located in the extreme southeast corner of the project site is proposed to be relocated to one of the lots within the proposed subdivision (Lot 17). Vegetation on the site consists of several mature trees and numerous grave vines. Lots within the proposed subdivision are placed in a north to south configuration, with 6 lots (Lots 1 thru 6) fronting onto Victoria Street, 10 lots (Lots 7 thru 16) fronting on to an east-west cul-de-sac, and 1 lot (Lot 17) oriented towards Etiwanda Avenue. Of the 16 lots, 7 are single-story 3,800 square foot homes, and 9 are two-story 4,150 square foot homes. The proposed design is a contemporary representation of Traditional, Spanish, and Bungalow architectural styles. Staff Comments: Major Issues: The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The design of the single-story building elevations provides for a substantial use of architectural elements to enhance the buildings design. However, on the two-story elevations the use of these materials is limited, appears to be focused at the center mass of the front elevation, and should be significantly expanded based on the following: Bungalow — Expand the use of wood siding where appropriate on the front and side elevations. Utilize stone accent materials at the garage and chimney elements. a. Traditional — Expand the use of the brick accent material on other portions of the front and side elevations at the chimney. DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18819 AND DRC2011-00629 August 16, 2011 Page 2 b. Traditional (2CX) — Significantly expand the use of the brick accent material to include areas near the front door and on all sides of the garage. c. Spanish — Recess various windows to provide depth to the building plane, additional shadow accents, and elements traditionally utilized in Spanish architecture. 2. Expand architectural styles to include the use of a native field stone. The native field stone is prevalent in the Etiwanda area, was traditionally used as an architectural element in the construction of homes in the area, and is encouraged in the development of new homes. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Associated with the proposed development of this tract, is the relocation of the Johnston home located in the extreme southeast corner of the project site. Existing improvements include the home, detached office, barn, and miscellaneous structures. The applicant is proposing the relocation of the home and detached office building to Lot 17, which fronts onto Etiwanda Avenue, also in the extreme southeast portion of this tract. The applicant is proposing the relocation of these structures, installing foundation improvements and completing finish lot improvements, which could include finished grade, gas, electrical, telephone, and water connections, and preservation of the existing cedar tree. All other improvements, including landscaping, parking, structural, etc, will be completed by the City. An associated Development Agreement will be presented to the City Council for the acquisition and acceptance of this lot and structure. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Provide solid masonry return walls between the units, not wrought iron fencing. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed project and forward to the Planning Commission for their consideration. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee members reviewed the project and requested that the applicant address the following issues: • The Committee reviewed the single-story elevations and did not recommend any design changes. • The Committee reviewed the two-story elevations and recommended the following design modifications: 1. Traditional — Expand the use of brick siding to enhance the entrance and additional portions of the front elevation. DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18819 AND DRC2011-00629 August 16, 2011 Page 3 2. Bungalow— Incorporate the use of field stone on the front and side elevations. 3. Spanish — Provided architectural elements at various windows to provide depth to the building plane, additional shadow accents, and elements traditionally utilized in Spanish architecture. Revise the garage door style for consistency with the architectural theme. • The Committee recommended the installation of 6-foot high solid masonry walls along the local equestrian trail. The Committee requested that the applicant work with staff on the design issues and return to the Design Review Committee at a later date. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Tom Grahn DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS August 16, 2011 ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, N Gt2ANCa.,\'� James f . Troyer, AICP Planning Director