HomeMy WebLinkAbout83-13 - Resolutions • RESOLUTION NO. 83-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE NO. 81-01 AND CERTIFICATION OF THE
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR
THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY
WHEREAS, an application and supporting documents have been filed for
the establishment of a Planned Community Zone for approximately 1321 acres
generally located between Base Line and Foothill Boulevard on the north and
south, and Rochester and Haven on the east and west; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held several duly advertised
public hearings pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered all
elements of the proposed Planned Community and the associated Environmental
Impact Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission recommends certification of
adequacy for the final Environmental Impact Report to the City Council based
on the following findings:
1. The final Environmental Impact Report has been
prepared in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, the State, and local EIR
guidelines.
2. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered
the information contained within the EIR prior to
recommending approval of the project.
SECTION 2: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of this
statement of overriding considerations to the City Council :
To the extent that the Planned Community allows the
occurrence of significant effects identified in the final
EIR without full mitigation the City Council has
identified specific economic, ecological, and social
reasons to support its action which make infeasible the
project alternatives described in the final EIR or
additional mitigation measures. The Planning Commission
finds that facts supporting this finding are contained in
• the final EIR and the Planned Community text. Mitigation
measures have been made a condition of approval of the
Planned Community and are intended to mitigate or avoid
the significant environmental effects identified in the
Resolution No. 83-13
Page 2
•
final EIR. The Planned Community itself is a mitigation
measure which is intended to mitigate or avoid the
significant environmental effects of development which
could otherwise occur without a planned comprehensive
approach such as the Planned Community standards,
guidelines and regulations.
SECTION 3: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of Planned
Community No. 81-01 to the City Council based on the following findings and
recommended conditions;
FINDINGS:
1. Changes and alterations have been incorporated into
the project which mitigate significant environmental
effects to an acceptable level .
2. The Planned Community provides for the development
of a comprehensively planned urban community within
the zone that is superior to development otherwise
allowed under alternate regulations.
• 3. The Planned Community provides for development
within the zone in a manner consistent with the
General Plan and with related development and growth
management policies of the City.
4. The Planned Community provides for construction,
improvements, or extension of transportation
facilities, public utilities, and public services
required by development within the zone.
CONDITIONS
1. Prior to final approval of the first tract map in
Terra Vista, a detailed parks and open space
implementation plan shall be prepared by the
applicant and approved by the City Council .
2. Prior to consideration and approval of any
development in Terra Vista, mitigation measures
outlined in the final Environmental Impact Report
shall be reviewed and considered.
•
Resolution No. 83-13
Page 3
•
3. All flood control and drainage structures needed for
each individual development shall be constructed by
the developer. Adequate plans showing that each
phase can be safely and properly drained shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior
to issuance of building permits for that phase.
4. All traffic and circulation improvements shall be
designed and installed by the developer at the
direction of the City Engineer and as needed for
each development phase.
5. Prior to final approval of any residential
development, adequate capacity shall exist or will
be provided at the time of development for public
services such as schools, sewer treatment capacity,
water availability, and police and fire protection
and utilities.
6. Prior to final approval of the first tract map, the
creation of a maintenance district or other
• acceptable alternative shall be established for
Terra Vista.
7. The developer shall encourage and facilitate bus
service and transit routes throughout Terra Vista as
development occurs. Programs such as ride sharing,
provisions for park and ride facilities, bicycle
lanes, vanpool programs, shall be considered.
8. As development phases occur, appropriate physical
improvements shall be made by the developer for
pedestrian and bicycle routes and transit facilities
such as bus pullouts and waiting areas.
9. As each development phase occurs, berms, walls,
building attenuation shall be provided to adequately
mitigate any potential noise impacts.
10. The following standards and sections of the Planned
Community text shall be revised as follows:
A. Commercial setbacks on Special Boulevards:
1. Parking Area - Parking areas should be
setback at an average depth of 43 feet
from the face of curb and in no case shall
• be located closer than 28 feet to the face
of curb.
Resolution No. 83-13
Page 4
•
2. Building Setback - Buildings shall be
setback at an average of 43 feet from the
face of curb and shall be no closer than
38 feet from the face of curb.
B. Residential Setbacks on Special Boulevards:
1. Building Setbacks - Two story or greater
buildings shall be setback at an average
depth of 43 feet from the face of the curb
and no less than 38 feet from the face of
curb. One story buildings shall be
setback at an average 38 feet from the
face of the curb and no less than 33' from
the face of the curb.
2. Walls - The use of walls shall be
discouraged wherever possible through the
use of side on cul-de-sacs, berming,
landscaping or building setbacks and
• orientation. Where walls are needed for
single family detached units, they shall
be setback at an average of 20 feet from
the face of the curb and no less than 18'
from the face of the curb. Where walls
are needed for clustered multiple family
units, they shall be setback a minimum of
28 feet from the face of curb.
C. The format of the residential development
standard section shall be revised to eliminate
repetition and shall use matrixes for uses and
standards.
D. The text beginning in Section VI, page 2
through 4, under the subtitle "Applicable Law
and Park Plan" shall be eliminated in its
entirety.
E. On page VI-4 of the text under "Provisions for
Meeting Park Requirements", the statement on
public open areas should be amended to
read. . ."not to total less than 42.6 acres or
77% whichever is greater of the total amount
required.
•
• Resolution No. 83-13
Page 5
•
F. The Affordable Housing provisions contained in
Section VI, shall be revised as follows:
1. The language discussing the use of
affordable programs and entitlements,
shall be partially eliminated and amended.
2. A statement shall be included that it is
the goal to provide at least fifteen
percent (15%) affordable housing in each
of the four major neighborhoods of the
Planned Community.
3. The discussion on control of windfall
profits shall be eliminated.
11. The above required revisions shall be submitted to
the City Planner in draft form for review and
approval within 30 days from the adoption by the
City Council . The final adopted revised text shall
be printed and submitted to the City Planner within
• 60 days from City Council approval .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1983.
PLANNING C'MMISSION OF THE CIT iF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: /IL_ /M
Jef i ng ' G
ATiy ST •
Se etary of the Plannin. ommission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 26th day of January, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, STOUT, BARKER, MCNIEL, KING
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
• ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE