Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014/12/17 - Agenda Packet - Special/Regular
.•.. .gly of CHO eoCAMON GA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909)477-2700 AGENDAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD SUCCESSOR AGENCY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2014 REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays + 7:00 P.M. ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room 5:00 P.M. Call to Order Public Communications Conduct of Closed Session City Manager Announcements SPECIAL MEETING Council Chambers 6:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS MAYOR L. Dennis Michael MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Spagnolo COUNCIL MEMBERS William Alexander Lynne B. Kennedy Diane Williams CITY MANAGER John R. Gillison CITY ATTORNEY James L. Markman CITY CLERK Janice C. Reynolds ' 'NCLc;^,' CITY TREASURER James C. Frost ••Oa a 1. f 41 I I I IR INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC .._. -_af-Alsfie LAICAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board,Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda,please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. If as part of your presentation, you would like to display visual material, please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences. Any handouts for the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During"Public Communications,"your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items)will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other"Public Communications"which have not concluded during this one-hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an"Advertised Public Hearing"or on an"Administrative Hearing"Item(s),your name will be called when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less,as deemed necessary by the Chair,depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's Public Library(-ies) and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers'without cable access to view the meetings"on-demand"from their computers. The added feature of"Streaming Video On Demand"is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/council/videos.aspfor those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem)or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Fire Board,Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board,Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.citvofrc.us elIf you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 1 L • : • AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA . noeliOCticAMONGA DECEMBER 17, 2014 A. 5:00 P.M. — CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER — TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM Al. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) J rC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I 1 D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION — TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM I D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURECES DIRECTOR AND LORI SASSON, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTER ASSOCIATION LOCAL 227— FIRE D2. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT RED HILL PARK 7484 VINEYARD AVE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES NETTIE NIELSEN, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR, BILL WITTKOPF, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CITRUS LITTLE LEAGUE; REGARDING LEASE TERMS. — CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE (SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WHITTRAM AVENUE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE); NEGOTIATING PARTIES MARK STEUER, CITY ENGINEER AND LEN SANTORO, CBRE AND ORANGE TREE REALTY; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY D4. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 8408 ROCHESTER AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: NETTIE NIELSEN, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND BOBBY BRETT, RANCHO BASEBALL, LLC) REGARDING LEASE TERMS. - CITY E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS (NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION WILL OCCUR) FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 2 AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA • ttlOaCAr., N DECEMBER 17, 2014 rwpi RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. G. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL ONLY CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams H. ITEMS OF BUSINESS H1. Public Communication. H2. Presentation of Service Pins to City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council members and employees. I. RECESS I THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL CONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. s174-r->\ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR • AGENCY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY J 3 L AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA •-:; aiAmt.1t0(UCAMON�,, DECEMBER 17, 2014 ..._ J. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER — 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. J1. Pledge of Allegiance J2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams IK. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I K1. Presentation of City Tile to Council Member Mark Steinorth in appreciation for his service to ___ the City of Rancho Cucamonga. K2. Recognition of Library Director Robert Karatsu and Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager ' " Debra L. McNay, MMC upon their retirements. K3. Administration of Oath of Office to Re-Appointed Rancho Cucamonga Community & Arts ___ Foundation Board Member Thomas Galindo. K4. Presentation of the League of California Cities Helen Putnam Award for the Healthy RC " " Youth Leaders Program. IL. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR ••• • AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 4 • AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ..�A °fto(,LCAMONGA DECEMBER 17, 2014 The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. M. CONSENT CALENDAR — FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Ml. Approval of Minutes: December 3, 2014 (Regular Meeting) --- M2. Approval of Check Register dated November 25, 2014 through December 9, 2014 for the 1 total of $409,420.13. M3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 2014. 11 M4. Release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 7635702 in the amount of $11,222.13, for 16 the Remediation and Demolition Services for the Properties at 9547 and 9561 San Bernardino Road project, Contract No. FD13-010. M5. Approval of a Resolution adopting Fire District Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2014-15. 18 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-051 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 N. CONSENT CALENDAR — SUCCESSOR AGENCY , N1. Approval of Minutes: December 3, 2014 (Regular Meeting) --- N2. Review and approval of the Housing Successor's Fiscal Year 2013/14 Annual Report. 23 I0. CONSENT CALENDAR — PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 01. Approval of Minutes: December 3, 2014 (Regular Meeting) ___ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR ,••• AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 5 �, :; AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA .,![ANCIIO alCAMON \ DECEMBER 17, 2014 P. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL P1. Approval of Minutes: December 3, 2014 (Regular Meeting) December 3, 2014 (Special Meeting) P2. Approval of Check Register dated November 25, 2014 through December 9, 2014 and 30 payroll ending December 9, 2014 for the total of $5,470,554.41. P3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 2014. 40 P4. Approval of Specifications for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Maintenance Contract 49 and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids", to be funded from account no. 1177303-5300 (Measure I) and various Special District accounts as approved in the FY 2014/2015 budget. RESOLUTION NO. 14-218 50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS P5. Release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16227-2, located North of Day Creek 54 Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Ryland Homes. P6. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Haven Avenue Electric Distribution Line Extension Project, to be funded from Utility Fund, Account No. 56 1705303-5650/1883705-0. RESOLUTION NO. 14-219 57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HAVEN AVENUE ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION PROJECT", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS P7. Approval of an Agreement for Contract No. 14-115, and authorization of an appropriation, 61 for Architectural Services with Pitassi Architects, Inc. for the Construction Drawings for the Second Floor of the Biane Library in the mount not to exceed $128,600 to be funded from Fund 1329601-5650/1867329-0. P8. Approval of a Resolution adopting Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2014-15, including the 62 addition and amending of certain classifications. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR :•: AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 6 • �:•` AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 17, 2014 RESOLUTION NO, 14-220 64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15, INCLUDING THE ADDITION AND AMENDING OF CERTAIN CLASSIFICATIONS AND CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS P9. Approval of an Interim Appointment of a CALPERS Retiree to fill the City Clerk Services 75 Director Position while an open recruitment is conducted. Q. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91 DRC2014-00012 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - A request to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APN: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. Related cases: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 and Development Review DRC2014- 0000127. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - A request to modify the Zoning Map to change land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo.Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APN: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. Related cases: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Development Review DRC2014- 0000127. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 14-221 295 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A 139,983 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON A 6.6-ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED SOUTH OF MISSION PARK DRIVE BETWEEN RICHMOND PLACE AND BUFFALO AVENUE WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, AND 09. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 7 _ J AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - IQ 01CAMONOA DECEMBER 17, 2014 ORDINANCE NO. 871 (FIRST READING) 303 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126, A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE ZONING MAP TO CHANGE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A 139,983 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON A 6.6-ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED SOUTH OF MISSION PARK DRIVE BETWEEN RICHMOND PLACE AND BUFFALO AVENUE WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. Q2. Consideration of an Urgency Interim Zoning Ordinance to require a Conditional Use Permit 311 for New Massage Establishments in all Zones in which such use is currently permitted by right for a period of 45 days. URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 872 314 AN INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS IN ALL ZONES IN WHICH SUCH USES ARE PERMITTED BY THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. Q3. Consideration of adopting updated Conflict of Interest Codes. 318 RESOLUTION NO. 14-222 319 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE WHICH INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE THE STANDARD CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE PREPARED BY THE FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 12-189 04. Approval of proposed Fee Amendments for Various City Departments amending Resolution ___ No. 12-196, 06-142, 07-048, 08-210, 79-1, 99-146, 14-191. RESOLUTION NO. 14-223 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE FOR APPLICABLE TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER VARIOUS MUNICIPAL SERVICES, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 12- 196, 06-142, 07-048, 08-210, 79-1, 99-146, 14-191. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR • AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 8 AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA IOC.00AMONi;A DECEMBER 17, 2014 1711.mr R. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. R1. Six-month status update for the Paid Parking Program in Cucamonga Canyon and the 334 Metrolink Station. S. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. Si. REVIEW OF APPOINTMENTS TO STANDING COMMITTEES AND OTHER 336 GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. S2. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the ___ meetings that were attended.) S3. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council ___ Member.) 11 T. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING U. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra L. McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 11, 2014, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. • - December 3, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY CLOSED SESSION, REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER I The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a regular closed session on Wednesday, December 3, 2014 in the Tapia Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Deputy City Attorney Steven Flower; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services and Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM I The following closed session items were considered: D1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE (SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WHITTRAM AVENUE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE); NEGOTIATING PARTIES MARK STEUER, CITY ENGINEER AND LEN SANTORO, CBRE AND ORANGE TREE REALTY; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 8408 ROCHESTER AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: NETTIE NIELSEN, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND BOBBY BRETT, RANCHO BASEBALL, LLC) REGARDING LEASE TERMS. - CITY C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I No public communications were made. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS I No discussion or actions were taken. F. RECESS I CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. The closed session recessed at 5:40 p.m. with no action taken. * DRAFT * December 3, 2014 I Special & Regular Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings City of Rancho Cucamonga I City Council Minutes I Page 1 of 7 G. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL ONLY CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a special meeting on Wednesday, December 3, 2014 in the City Council Chamber at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:05 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Deputy City Attorney Steven Flower; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services;Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director; Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director; Robert Nieuber, Human Resources Director; Anthony Onodera, Police Chief; Debra McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager and Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist II. G3. Approval of a Resolution certifying Municipal Election results. RESOLUTION NO. 14-214 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY ON NOVEMBER 4, 2014, DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS PROVIDED BY PROVISION OF LAW MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to adopt Resolution No. 14-214 certifying the election results. Motion carried 4-0. G4. Confirmation of Lynne Kennedy's appointment to the City Council. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to confirm Lynne Kennedy's appointment to the City Council. Motion carried 4-0. H. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I No comments were received. I. ITEMS OF BUSINESS WITH NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIALS H1. Oaths of Office will be administered by Honorable Jeffrey King, Associate Justice, to the following: • L. Dennis Michael, Mayor • Bill Alexander, Council Member • Diane Williams, Council Member • Lynne Kennedy, Council Member Jeffrey King, Associate Justice Jeffrey King administered the oaths of office. * DRAFT * December 3, 2014 I Special & Regular Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings City of Rancho Cucamonga I City Council Minutes I Page 2 of 7 I. RECESS I FOLLOWING RECESS, A RECEPTION WILL OCCUR IN THE FOYER OF THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS TO CONGRATULATE THE ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS.THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL CONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. Meeting adjourned at 6:20 pm. J. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER — 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER The meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Financing Authority and City Council reconvened in the City Council Chamber at the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Deputy City Attorney Steven Flower; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services;Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director; Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director; Robert Nieuber, Human Resources Director; Anthony Onodera, Police Chief; Debra McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager and Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist II. K. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I K1. Administration of Oaths of Office to re-appointed Rancho Cucamonga Community & Arts Foundation Board Members Al Arguello, Taro Barag, and Rosemarie Brown and to newly appointed Members Kimberly Alexander and Nick Baker. City Clerk Janice C. Reynolds administered the oaths of office. K2. Let's Move Cities, Towns and Counties: Most Innovative City Award + Five Gold Medal Award. Mayor Michael and Mike Palmer, Management Analyst I, announced the awards received by the Let's Move Cities, Towns and Counties program. L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I L1.Janet Walton offered a prayer for the City Council and the audience. L2. Susan Keithly spoke about the Animal Care and Adoption Center staff not checking for microchips on the 2 Pomeranians. She wondered why the welfare check was not done sooner and noted that a one- sided investigation was done. Ms. Keithly requested a town hall meeting and wondered why the public was only allowed 3 minutes to speak. L3. Ondra Gilbertson spoke about her dog, Zoey, and what happened when the dog bit her. She expressed concerns with all three dogs being taken by the Animal Center. * DRAFT * December 3, 2014 I Special & Regular Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings City of Rancho Cucamonga I City Council Minutes I Page 3 of 7 L4. Allison Kreider spoke regarding this incident. She expressed concerns with the excessive costs that were incurred with the transportation of these 3 dogs. Two of the dogs were not injured. L5. Melissa Schweigert continued to discuss the matter. She indicated that it was illegal to take the dogs without the owner's permission. L6. Dana Keithly noted that Ondra returned home at about 4:30 that day. The dogs should have been returned to her at that time. The unreasonable charges should be cancelled. Also, Ms. Keithly noted that the report in response to Council Member Alexander's concerns has never been released. L7. Vicky Reust pointed out the activities that the fired volunteers had been offering. Since that time, activities offered by the Center have decreased and opportunities are being wasted. L8. Lynn Weise spoke about her request to the City Manager for the name of the firm that conducted the investigation of the Center Director. Ms. Weise reported that a private investigator conducted the investigation and stated that this person is not familiar with how to run a shelter. L9. James McGuire was very concerned with the low voter turnout at the recent election. L10. Luara Hernandez reported that a grand opening is being planned for the summer of 2015 for the service station on Route 66. L11.John Lyons referenced the previous speakers and indicated that millions of dollars would be needed to operate a"No Kill"facility.The Animal Care and Adoption Center is well run. Mr. Lyons noted that there were people who would be able to help the lady pay her bills. He wished the Council and the audience a Merry Christmas. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. M. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT I Ml. Approval of Minutes: November 19, 2014 (Regular Meeting) M2. Approval of Check Register dated November 12, 2014 through November 24, 2014 for the total of $69,013.43. M3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of October 31, 2014. M4. Request approval by Resolution of the revised Records Retention Schedule for the Fire Protection District. RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AMENDED RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT. Council Member Kennedy abstained from voting on Item Ml. * DRAFT * December 3, 2014 I Special & Regular Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings City of Rancho Cucamonga I City Council Minutes I Page 4 of 7 MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0 with Council Member Kennedy abstaining on Item M1. N. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY N1. Approval of Minutes: November 19, 2014 (Regular Meeting) Council Member Kennedy abstained from voting on Item N1. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo, to approve the minutes. Motion carried 4-0-0-1 with Council Member Kennedy abstaining. I0. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 01. Approval of Minutes: November 19, 2014 (Regular Meeting) Council Member Kennedy abstained from voting on Item 01. MOTION: Moved by Kennedy, seconded by Spagnolo, to approve the minutes. Motion carried 4-0-0-1 with Council Member Kennedy abstaining. P. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL P1. Approval of Minutes: November 19, 2014 (Regular Meeting) P2. Approval of Check Register dated November 12, 2014 through November 24, 2014 and payroll ending November 24, 2014 for the total of$5,997,391.22. P3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of October 31, 2014. P4. Approval to accept grant revenue (ML14032) in the amount of $113,990 ($87,500 Expansion CNG Station, $26,490 Bicycle Lockers Installation) from the South Coast Air Quality Management District, administered by the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) into account 1105000-4740 (AQMD-Grant Revenue) and authorize the appropriation of $87,500 into account 1105208-5650/1873105-0 (Capital Project) and $26,490 into account 1105208-5607 (Capital Outlay-Improvement Other Than Building); authorize the Public Works Services Director to be the designated signatory authority on behalf of the City; authorize the appropriation of $96,210 into account 1712001-5650/1873712-0 from Fund 712 fund balance for the City's share of the CNG Expansion Project cost; and authorize Change Order Number 1 in the amount of$183,710 with TOMCO, LLC to add additive alternate bid items 1 and 2 for the CNG Expansion Project. P5. Release of Maintenance Bond No. 1971654 in the amount of $97,376 for the Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement FY 12/13 Project, Contract No. 13-012. P6. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract Map 16226-2, located north of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue within Rancho Etiwanda Estates, submitted by BMC Rancho Etiwanda, LLC, and to authorize the release of the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Rancho Etiwanda Estates Infrastructure (Tentative Tract 16226). * DRAFT * December 3, 2014 I Special & Regular Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings City of Rancho Cucamonga I City Council Minutes I Page 5 of 7 RESOLUTION NO. 14-215 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT MAP 16226-2 RESOLUTION NO. 14-216 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE RELEASE OF THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE AND LABOR AND MATERIAL BONDS FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES INFRASTRUCTURE (TENTATIVE TRACT 16226) P7. Accept traffic signal improvements and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 18856, located on the south side of Church Street between Mayten Avenue and Malaga Drive, submitted by Homecoming V at Terra Vista, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 14-217 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 18856 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK P8. Approval of Drainage Reimbursements for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan for FY 2013/2014 and appropriation of $147,850.94 to Account No. 1116303-5650/1026116-0. P9. Approval of Drainage Reimbursements for the General City Master Plan for FY 2013/2014 and appropriation of$159,548.39 to Account No. 1112303-5650/1026112-0. P10. Approval of an amendment to the City Manager's Contract— Removed for discussion. Council Member Alexander removed Item P10 for discussion. Council Member Kennedy abstained from voting on Item P1. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the remaining staff reports. Motion carried 5-0 with Council Member Kennedy abstaining on Item P1. P10. Approval of an amendment to the City Manager's Contract— Removed for discussion. Council Member Alexander indicated that the salary ranges are out of control. He understood the need to survey surrounding cities but noted that every time one City raises their salaries, other cities follow suit. This is not a privately held company but a municipal government. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo stated that this action is a merit increase. Employees are evaluated annually and can earn a merit increase if their performance warrants it. Council Member Williams indicated the need to pay a salary that is in line with other cities. The City will lose a lot of talented people if the salary structure is not maintained. Mayor Michael stated that the personnel manual requires an annual review and provides for merit increases if warranted. Mr. Gillison is paying for all of his retirement costs. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendation in the staff report. Motion carried 4-1 with Council Member Alexander voting no. * DRAFT * December 3, 2014 I Special & Regular Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings City of Rancho Cucamonga I City Council Minutes I Page 6 of 7 Q. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. P1. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES (Update by thCity Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo announced that the OmniTrans Board of Directors has reached an agreement with the bus drivers. Mayor Michael reported that the San Bernardino Associated Governments Board has directed staff to pursue a design and build process for the new Express lanes. Q2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) Council Member Alexander thanked the community who had re-elected him to the City Council. He welcomed Council Member Kennedy. Mayor Michael also thanked the community and welcomed Council Member Kennedy. He noted that she will be a great asset to the City Council. Council Member Kennedy thanked the City Council for their support and promised to serve the community well during her tenure on the City Council. Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified. R. ADJOURNMENT I, The meeting was adjourned at 7:59 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McNay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: * DRAFT * December 3, 2014 I Special & Regular Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings City of Rancho Cucamonga I City Council Minutes I Page 7 of 7 Proclamation WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is committed to preserving the rich history of the community; and, WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga designated the Etiwanda Pacific Electric, Depot a historical landmark in 1981 and it was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 2011; and, WHEREAS, the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot is a single-story, concrete structure that was designed by Irving John Gill in the Mission Revival architectural style and built in 1914; and, WHEREAS,for many years, the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot served the local citrus and grape industry whose growers exported their products nationally; and, WHEREAS, the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot is no longer used as a depot yet continues to contribute to the historic character of the Etiwanda neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, on September 13, 2014, the Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail, Richleigh Construction, Lowe's Home Improvement Store, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department collaborated in securing the structure to protect it from the elements and vandalism; and, WHEREAS, this volunteer effort is a great example of a community partnership working together towards a common goal of stabilizing a local landmark so that future preservation efforts will be successful. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, recognizes and offers its appreciation to the Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail, Richleigh Construction, Lowe 's Home Improvement Store, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department for their efforts to stabilize the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot so that it can be enjoyed by the community now and for years to come. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, have hereunto set their hand and caused the seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be affixed this 17`h day of December, 2014. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P1 • AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353310 11/26/2014 A&V SOFTBALL 2,295.00 0.00 "2,295.00 AP 00353311 11/26/2014 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 AP 00353312 11/26/2014 AKBAR,KAMRAN 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00353313 11/26/2014 AROCHO,ALMA 654.00 0.00 654.00 AI' 00353314 11/26/2014 ASSI SECURITY 1,502.00 0.00 1,502.00 AP 00353315 11/26/2014 AVANTS,MARGE 255.00 0.00 255.00 Al' 00353316 11/26/2014 BALLAT,MAHA 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00353317 11/26/2014 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 0.00 2,325.00 2,325.00 AP 00353318 11/26/2014 BLIND BOYS OF ALABAMA LLC 7,672.50 0.00 7,672.50 • AP 00353319 11/26/2014 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 186.75 0.00 186.75 AP 00353320 11/26/2014 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00353321 11/26/2014 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00353322 11/26/2014 CALPERS 124,197.09 7,742.95 131,940.04*** AP 00353323 11/26/2014 CARDENAS,TAKAKO 85.00 . 0.00 85.00 AP 00353324 11/26/2014 CIRIACKS,VALERIE ANN 75.00 0.00 75.00 AP 00353325 11/26/2014 CLARK,KAREN 950.40 0.00 950.40 AP 00353326 11/26/2014 CLIMATEC LLC 5,474.75 0.00 5,474.75 AP 00353327 11/26/2014 COCHERELL,DOREEN 96.00 0.00 96.00 AP 00353328 11/26/2014 CONFIRE JPA 0.00 50,254.43 50,254.43 AP 00353329 11/26/2014 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 8,144.50 0.00 8,144.50 AP 00353330 11/26/2014 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 295.00 0.00 295.00 AP 00353331 11/26/2014 CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS'INC 390.00 390.00 780.00*** AP 00353332 11/26/2014 DATA ARC LLC 3,902.44 0.00 3,902.44 AP 00353333 11/26/2014 DAVID BENOIT.MUSIC INC. 14,000.00 0.00 14,000.00 AP 00353334 11/26/2014 DESERT DIAMOND INDUSTRIES LLC 0.00 531.00 531.00 AP 00353335 11/26/2014 DOLLARHIDE,GINGER 108.00 0.00 108.00 AP 00353336 11/26/2014 DUNN,ANN MARIE 732.00 0.00 732.00 AP 00353337 11/26/2014 EARLEY,IDA 343.20 0.00 343.20 AP 00353338 11/26/2014 EASTERLING,RAY 268.80 0.00 268.80 AP 00353339 11/26/2014 GIORDANO,MARIANNA 48.00 0.00 48.00 AP 00353340 1 126/2014 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,045.00 0.00 3,045.00 AP 00353341 1 1/26/2014 GOODFIELD,RICHARD 168.00 0.00 168.00 AP 00353342 11/26/2014 GRAINGER 283.76 0.00 283.76 AP . 00353343 11/26/2014 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 896.03 0.00 896.03 AP 00353344 11/26/2014 HAMILTON,MONIQUE 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00353345 11/26/2014 HAMPTON YOGA - 828.00 0.00 828.00 AP 00353346 11/26/2014 HAY, SHARYN 192.00 0.00 192,00 AP 00353347 11/26/2014 HDL COREN AND CONE 4,200.00 0.00 • 4,200.00 AP 00353348 11/26/2014 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 493.00 0.00 493.00 AP 00353349 11/26/2014 IBM CORPORATION 584.22 0.00 584.22 AP 00353350 11/26/2014 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIA'T'ION BOARD 1,424.51 0.00 1,424.51 • AP 00353351 11/26/2014 INLAND PRESORT&MAILING SERVICES 97.43 0.00 97.43 AP 00353352 11/26/2014 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF ADMIN PROFESSIONALS 0.00 166.00 166.00 AP 00353353 11/26/2014 ISAAC,RAMY 117.00 0.00 117.00 AP 00353354 11/26/2014 JACOBSEN WEST 2,821.70 0.00 2,821.70 AP 00353355 11/26/2014 JENNINGS,KRISTEN 50.00 - 0.00 50.00 AP 00353356 11/26/2014 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 312.00 0.00 312.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: I Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:15:18 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P2 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register I 1/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353357 11/26/2014 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC - 1,402.86 0.00 1,402.86 • AP 00353358 11/26/2014 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 3,008.00 0.00 3,008.00 AP 00353359 11/26/2014 K K WOODWORKING 86.32 0.00 86.32 AP 00353360 11/26/2014 KARATSU,ROBERT 1,213.70 0.00 1,213.70 AP 00353361 11/26/2014 KATAHDIN ENVIRONMENTAL 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00353362 11/26/2014 KONE INC - 613.67 0.00 613.67 AP 00353363 11/26/2014 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0.00 706.83 706.83 AP 00353364 11/26/2014 LAVRUK,ALEX 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00353365 11/26/2014 LEARNING EXPRESS LLC . 4,181.00 0.00 4,181.00 AP 00353366 11/26/2014 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 47.81 47.81 AP 00353367 11/26/2014 LIGHTHOUSE,THE 0.00 8.10 8.10 AP 00353368 11/26/2014 LIGHT WIRE THEATER 13,020.00 0.00 13,020.00 AP 00353369 11/26/2014 LINDA RYAN REPORTING 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00353370 11/26/2014 LOPEZ,LUPITA 500.00 0.00 500.00 • AP 00353371 11/26/2014 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 62,424.80 0.00 62,424.80 AP 00353372 11/26/2014 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00353373 11/26/2014 MARRUJO,PAUL 5.00 - 0.00 5.00 AP 00353374 11/26/2014 MARTIN AND CHAPMAN CO 41.48 0.00 41.48 AP 00353375 11/26/2014 MAVENLINK INC 280.00 0.00 280.00 AP 00353376 11/26/2014 MCG ARCHITECTURE 488.00 0.00 488.00 • AP 00353377 11/26/2014 MEDINA,DAYRA 8.96 0.00 8.96 AP 00353378 11/26/2014 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 1,410.00 0.00 1,410.00 AP 00353379 11/26/2014 MICHAEL PICK INTERNATIONAL INC 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00353380 11/26/2014 MIDWEST TAPE 767.29 0.00 767.29 AP 00353381 11/26/2014 MILANETTO,MARSHA 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00353382 11/26/2014 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC&ELECTRONICS USA INC 626.95 0.00 626.95 AP 00353383 11/26/2014 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 59.28 - 0.00 59.28 AP 00353384 11/26/2014 MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00353385 11/26/2014 MUMOLO,ANNE'ITE 108.64 0.00 - 108.64 AP 00353386 11/26/2014 NAIOP 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00353387 11/26/2014 O'LEARY.MAXWELL DOUGLAS 85.00 0.00 - 85.00 AP 00353388 11/26/2014 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 125.39 1,234.00 1,359.39*** AP 00353389 11/26/2014 OCLC INC 50.45 0.00 50.45 AP 00353391 11/26/2014. OFFICE DEPOT 4,088.07 5,936.68 10,024.75*** AP 00353392 11/26/2014 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 23.46 0.00 • 23.46 AP - 00353393 11/26/2014 ONWARD ENGINEERING 12,835.00 0.00 ' 12,835.00 AP 00353394 11/26/2014 OOST,NANCY 1 30.00 0.00 30.00 . AP 00353395 11/26/2014 • ORANGE PUBLIC LIBRARY 25.00 0.00 25.00 AP 00353396 11/26/2014 ORONA,PATRICIA 675.00 0.00 675.00 AP 00353397 11/26/2014 OTT,LAURA 627.00 0.00 627.00 AP 00353398 11/26/2014 OTT,SHARON 414.00 0.00 414.00 AP 00353399 11/26/2014 PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00353400 11/26/2014 PARS 3,500.00 - 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00353401 11/26/2014 PARTIDA, MARICELA 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00353402 11/26/2014 PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE 95.00 • 0.00 95.00 • AP 00353403 11/26/2014 PETERSON NUT COMPANY 3,233.50 0.00 3,233.50 AP 00353404 11/26/2014 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 33,882.50 0.00 33,882.50 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ - Page: 2 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:15:18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P3 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353405 11/26/2014 PITNEY BOWES 1,521.77 0.00 1,521.77 AP 00353406 11/26/2014 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 91.05 0.00 91.05 AP 00353407 11/26/2014 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 1,004.90 1,004.90 Al' 00353408 11/26/2014 PROJECT SISTER FAMILY SERVICES 6,582.58 0.00 6,582.58 AP 00353409 11/26/2014 RAINEY,LATREACE 630.00 0.00 630.00 AP 00353410 11/26/2014 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL INC 131.99 0.00 131.99 AP 00353411 11/26/2014 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 10.80 0.00 10.80 AP 00353412 11/26/2014 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 27,525.83 0.00 27,525.83 AP 00353413 11/26/2014 RICHLEIGH ASSOCIATES INC 2,356.00 0.00 2,356.00 AP 00353414 11/26/2014 RIVERA JR,CARLOS 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00353415 11/26/2014 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 22,551.10 0.00 22,551.10 AP 00353416 11/26/2014 ROCKAPELLA ROAD CORP 7,440.00 0.00 7,440.00 AP 00353417 11/26/2014 SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 7,386.00 0.00 7,386.00 AP 00353418 11/26/2014 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 714.00 0.00 714.00 AP 00353419 11/26/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 55,143.75 0.00 55,143.75 AP 00353420 11/26/2014 SANCHEZ,CARMEN 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00353421 11/26/2014 SANCHEZ,FLOR 86.11 0.00 86.11 AP 00353422 11/26/2014 SBPEA 764.13 0.00 764.13 AP 00353423 11/26/2014 SC FUELS 25,288.45 10,066.33 35,354.78*** AP 00353424 11/26/2014 SCARANO,ROBERT LOUIS 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00353425 11/26/2014 SENECHAL,CALVIN 508.20 0.00 - 508.20 AP 00353426 11/26/2014 SEXTON,SHEILA 6.00 0.00 6.00 AP 00353427 11/26/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 93.38 0.00 93.38 AP 00353428 11/26/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00353429 11/26/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 48.17 0.00 48.17 AP 00353430 11/26/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 426.20 0.00 426.20 AP 00353431 11/26/2014 SHORT LOAD CONCRETE 569.16 0.00 569.16 AP 00353432 11/26/2014 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 14,143.18 0.00 14,143.18 AP 00353433 11/26/2014 SMALL DOG ELECTRONICS 0.00 7,074.20 7,074.20 AP 00353434 11/26/2014 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 412.77 264.60 677.37*** AP 00353435 11/26/2014 SOLIS,EDNA 224.00 0.00 224.00 •AP 00353439 11/26/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16,333.11 2,296.97 18,630.08*** AP 00353440 11/26/2014 SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 1,773.00 0.00 1,773.00 AP 00353441 11/26/2014 SPARKLETTS 76.00 0.00 76.00 AP 00353442 11/26/2014 SPINITAR 89,747.68 9,460.42 99,208.10*** AP 00353443 11/26/2014 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 25.59 0.00 25.59 AP 00353444 11/26/2014 STOVER SEED COMPANY 2,008.80 0.00 2,008.80 AP 00353445 11/26/2014 SUN BADGE CO 0.00- 497.00 497.00 AP 00353446 11/26/2014 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 10,239.40 0.00 10,239.40 AP 00353447 11/26/2014 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR USER GROUP ASSOC INC 195.00 0.00 195.00 AP 00353448 11/26/2014 SWRCB FEES 36,416.00 0.00 36,416.00 AP 00353449 11/26/2014 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00353450 11/26/2014 THEATRE @ BOSTON COURT,THE 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00353451 11/26/2014 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER 403.24 0.00 403.24 AP 00353452 11/26/2014 TOPOR,MICHAEL 41.50 0.00 41.50 AP 00353453 11/26/2014 TRACEY,VAL 612.00 0.00 612.00 AP 00353454 11/26/2014 TUFANO,ISABEL 34.50 0.00 34.50 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ .Page: 3 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:15:18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . P4 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353455 11/26/2014 UNITED WAY 186.00 0.00 186.00 AI' 00353456 11/26/2014 UPLAND AUTO TRIM 203.60 0.00 203.60 AP 00353457 11/26/2014 UPS . 73.22 0.00 73.22 AP 00353458 11/26/2014 VAUGHN, BRAD W 85.00 0.00 85.00 Al' 00353459 11/26/2014 VECCHIO,TOM 315.40 0.00 315.40 AP 00353461 11/26/2014 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 3,526.34 1,140.59 4,666.93 •" AI' 00353462 11/26/2014 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LP 28.62 0.00 28.62 AP 00353463 11/26/2014 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,497.12 0.00 10,497.12 AP 00353464 11/26/2014 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 0.00 515.00 515.00 AP 00353465 11/26/2014 WANG,JONATHAN 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00353466 11/26/2014 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3,301.18 0.00 3,301.18 AP 00353467 11/26/2014 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 2,354.40 0.00 2,354.40 AP 00353468 11/26/2014 WLC 0.00 812.49 812.49 AP 00353469 11/26/2014 WOMEN LEADING GOVERNMENT 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00353470 11/26/2014 WONG, DAVID 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00353471 11/26/2014 ZEE MEDICAL INC 222.95 0.00 222.95 AP 00353472 11/26/2014 HUNTER,BRODERICK 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00353475 11/26/2014 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95,984.44 2,317.75 98,302.19"' AP 00353476 11/26/2014 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 2,133.06 0.00 2,133.06 AP 00353477 11/26/2014 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 610.00 0.00 610.00 AP 00353478 11/26/2014 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,165.00 0.00 1,165.00 AP 00353479 11/26/2014 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 0.00 169.99 169.99 AP 00353480 11/26/2014 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 90.65 . 456.38 547.03 "' AP 00353481 11/26/2014 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 295.96 295.96 AP 00353482 11/26/2014 LIMS AUTO INC 1,380.55 0.00 1,380.55 AP 00353483 11/26/2014 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 83,840.09 83,840.09 AP 00353484 11/26/2014 NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 7,343.57 0.00 7,343.57 AP 00353485 11/26/2014 SPINITAR 445.00 0.00 445.00 AP 00353486 11/26/2014 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 247.93 0.00 247.93 AP 00353487 11/26/2014 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 0.00 172.39 172.39 AP 00353488 11/26/2014 BELL,MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,504.93 1,504.93 AP 00353489 11/26/2014 LONCAR,PHILIP 0.00 964.58 964.58 AP 00353490 11/26/2014 TOWNSEND,JAMES 0.00 10,534.51 10,534.51 AP 00353491 11/26/2014 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 208.36 208.36 AP 00353492 12/03/2014 10-8 RETROFIT INC. 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00353493 12/03/2014 8TH ST.COLLISION 1,597.20 0.00 1,597.20 AI' 00353494 12/03/2014 909 MAGAZINE 550.00 0.00 550.00 AP 00353495 12/03/2014 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. . 52.86 0.00 52.86 AP 00353496 12/03/2014 ACP 738.72 0.00 738.72 • AP 00353497 12/03/2014 ACTION AWARDS INC. 1,611.19 0.00 1,611.19 AI' 00353498 12/03/2014 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS INC 604.80 0.00 604.80 AP 00353499 12/03/2014 ADVANCED TTECITNICAL SOLUTIONS INC 6,245.38 0.00 6,245.38 AP 00353500 12/03/2014 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 7,087.50 0.00 7,087.50 AP 00353501 12/03/2014 AFSS 0.00 50.00 50.00 AP 00353502 12/03/2014 AIR EXCHANGE INC 0.00 52,817.34 52,817.34 AP 00353503 12/03/2014 ALL CITIES TOOLS 417.65 0.00 417.65 AP 00353504 12/03/2014 ALL SURFACE ROOFING&WATERPROOFING INC 52,987.20 0.00 52,987.20 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:15:18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P5 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register . 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353505 12/03/2014 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES LLC 29,823.02 0.00 29,823.02 AP 00353506 12/03/2014 ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS 0.00 194.40 194.40 AP 00353507 12/03/2014 ALMETEK INDUSTRIES INC. 4,312.00 0.00 4,312.00 AP 00353508 12/03/2014 ALPHAGRAPHICS 45.36 0.00 45.36 • AP 00353509 12/03/2014 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC 725.31 0.00 725.31 AP 00353510 12/03/2014 AMERICAN ASPFIALT SOUTH INC 51,989.14 0.00 51,989.14 AP 00353511 12/03/2014 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,189.10 0.00 1,189.10 AP 00353512 12/03/2014 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 246.83 0.00 246.83 AP 00353513 12/03/2014 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION/MEMBERSHIP 280.00 0.00 280.00 AP 00353514 12/03/2014 ASPLUND,BRANDON 66.00 0.00 66.00 AP 00353515 12/03/2014 AT&T MOBILITY 0.00 123.78 123.78 AP 00353516 12/03/2014 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 89.70 0.00 89.70 AP 00353517 12/03/2014 BALL,ROBERT 0.00 . 28.02 28.02 AP 00353518 12/03/2014 BARNES AND NOBLE 259.37 0.00 259.37 AP 00353519 12/03/2014 BATTERY POWER INC 100.39 0.00 100.39 AP 00353520 12/03/2014 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 0.00 1,121.54 1,121.54 AP 00353521 12/03/2014 BRAILEY,KRISTIN 69.28 0.00 69.28 AP 00353522 12/03/2014 BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN 303.44 0.00 303.44 AP 00353523 12/03/2014 CABLE INC. 11,339.70 0.00 11,339.70 AP 00353524 12/03/2014 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 557.08 21.44 578.52••• AP 00353525 12/03/2014 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 190.22 701.84 892.06••• AP 00353526 12/03/2014 CHEMICAL SAFETY TRAINING 0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 AP 00353527 12/03/2014 CINTAS CORP.#150 3,460.76 0.00 3,460.76 AP 00353528 12/03/2014 CITY RENTALS 82.50 0.00 82.50 AP 00353529 12/03/2014 CLAREMONT COURIER 192.00 0.00 192.00 AP 00353530 12/03/2014 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 3.37 0.00 3.37 AP 00353531 12/03/2014 CLEAR COAST CONSTRUCTION 0.00 160.00 160.00 AP 00353532 12/03/2014 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 2,786.40 0.00 2,786.40 AP 00353533 12/03/2014 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 376.90 0.00 376.90 AP 00353534 12/03/2014 COOKE,DARRIN 13.33 0.00 13.33 AP 00353535 12/03/2014 CORODA'I'A MEDIA STORAGE INC 936.48 0.00 936.48 AP 00353536 12/03/2014 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 2,471.17 0.00 2,471.17 AP 00353537 12/03/2014 CPRS DISTRICT 11 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00353538 12/03/2014 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 251.42 0.00 251.42 AP 00353539 12/03/2014 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 413.65 0.00 413.65 AP 00353540 12/03/2014 D.P. DOOR CO. 582.12 .0.00 582.12 AP 00353541 12/03/2014 DEMCO INC 629.97 0.00 629.97 AP 00353542 12/03/2014 DOWNEY,JENNIFER 11.02 0.00 11.02 AP 00353543 12/03/2014 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,THE 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00353544 12/03/2014 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 507.98 0.00 507.98 AP 00353545 12/03/2014 EFENIO.SUZETTE 475.00 0.00 475.00 AP 00353546 12/03/2014 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 1,016.89 0.00 1,016.89 AP 00353547 12/03/2014 EMBROIDME . 144.72 0.00 144.72 AP 00353548 12/03/2014 ETIWANDA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00353549 12/03/2014 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 56.16 0.00 56.16 AP 00353550 12/03/2014 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00353551 12/03/2014 FASTENAL COMPANY 26.47 0.00 26.47 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:15:18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P6 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register I 1/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353552 12/03/2014 FCLO MUSIC THEATRE 251.80 0.00 251.80 AP 00353553 12/03/2014 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 62.69 0.00 62.69 AP 00353554 12/03/2014 FREEDOM NEWS GROUP 1,380.00 0.00 1,380.00 AP 00353555 12/03/2014 FURLOW,CRAIG 95.00 0.00 95.00 Al' 00353556 12/03/2014 GAIL MATERIALS 963.27 0.00 963.27 AP 00353557 12/03/2014 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING 2,714.29 0.00 2,714.29 AP 00353558 12/03/2014 GEOGRAPHICS 540.00 0.00 540.00 AP 00353559 12/03/2014 GONZALES.ANTOINETTE 74.48 0.00 74.48 AP 00353560 12/03/2014 GOODYEAR TIRE& RUBBER COMPANY 803.48 0.00 803.48 AP 00353561 12/03/2014 GRACIANO.TAMMIE 0.00 120.00 120.00 AP 00353562 12/03/2014 GRAINGER 464.85 61.76 526.61 *** AP 00353563 12/03/2014 GRANICUS INC 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00353564 12/03/2014 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 2,067.97 0.00 2,067.97 AP 00353565 12/03/2014 GUICE,STEPHANIE 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00353566 12/03/2014 I•ATANAKA,MARGARET 39.10 0.00 39.10 AP 00353567 12/03/2014 HAWTHORNE LIFT SYSTEMS 249.92 0.00 249.92 AP 00353568 12/03/2014 HEDIGER,PATRICK 137.45 0.00 137.45 AP 00353569 12/03/2014 HI WAY SAFETY INC 2,728.60 i 0.00 2,728.60 AP 00353570 12/03/2014 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 78,078.81 78,078.81 AP 00353571 12/03/2014 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 547.88 0.00 547.88 AP 00353572 12/03/2014 HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA LLC. 61,094.25 0.00 61,094.25 . AP 00353573 12/03/2014 HOOD, KARYE 22.97 0.00 22.97 AP 00353574 12/03/2014 HOSE MAN INC 342.46 44.82 387.28*** AP 00353575 12/03/2014 HOUSE OF RU'T'H 1,006.56 0.00 1,006.56 AP 00353576 12/03/2014 HOYT LUMBER CO.,SM 0.00 22.64 22.64 AP 00353577 12/03/2014 HOYT,ROBERT 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00353578 12/03/2014 HUMAN IMPACT PARTNERS 14,000.00 0.00 14,000.00 AP 00353579 12/03/2014 IMS INC 529.00 0.00 529.00 AP 00353580 12/03/2014 IMSA 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00353581 12/03/2014 INLAND PRESORT&MAILING SERVICES 28.74 0.00 28.74 AP 00353582 12/03/2014 IPROMOTEU 0.00 • 1,816.26 1,816.26 AP 00353583 12/03/2014 JARMACK,ASHLEY 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00353584 12/03/2014 JAS PACIFIC 3,895.87 0.00 3,895.87 . AP 00353585 12/03/2014 JOHNSON MACHINERY COMPANY 773.09 0.00 773.09 AP 00353586 12/03/2014 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 720.00 0.00 720.00 AP 00353587 12/03/2014 KRIEGER.ED 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00353588 12/03/2014 LA POWER CENTER 170.90 0.00 170.90 AP 00353589 12/03/2014 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 95.87 0.00 95.87 AP 00353590 12/03/2014 LARKIN,DAVID W 0.00 57.50 57.50 AI' 00353591 12/03/2014 LINNELL.SHERRY 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00353592 12/03/2014 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 6,580.00 0.00 ' 6,580.00 AP 00353593 12/03/2014 • LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 1,726.68 0.00 1,726.68 AP 00353594 12/03/2014 MAIN STREET SIGNS 2,386.15 . 0.00 2,386.15 AP 00353595 12/03/2014 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 77,541.51 4,559.98 82,101.49*** AP 00353596 12/03/2014 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 380.78 0.00 380.78 AP 00353597 12/03/2014 MEDINA,SANDRA 287.05 0.00 287.05 AP 00353598 12/03/2014 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 859.70 0.00 859.70 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:15:18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P7 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353599 12/03/2014 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 1,013.06 0.00 1,013.06 AP 00353600 12/03/2014 MIDWEST TAPE 618.12 0.00 618.12 AP 00353601 12/03/2014 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 47.42 0.00 47.42 AP 00353602 12/03/2014 MUSIC THEATRE IN'T'ERNATIONAL 108.00 0.00 108.00 AP 00353603 12/03/2014 NAPA AUTO PARTS 423.13 .0.00 423.13 AP 00353604 12/03/2014 NRC COMMERCIAL INC 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00353605 12/03/2014 OAKSTONE WELLNESS 2,307.53 0.00 2,307.53 AP 00353606 12/03/2014 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 320.84 . 0.00 320.84 AP 00353608 12/03/2014 OFFICE DEPOT 3,123.05 227.63 3,350.68 .•. AP 00353609 12/03/2014 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 15,313.20 0.00 15,313.20 AP 00353610 12/03/2014 PASMA. 75.00 0.00 75.00 AP 00353611 12/03/2014 PAZMINO,EDGAR 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00353612 12/03/2014 PERMACARD 3,013.97 0.00 3,013.97 AP 00353613 12/03/2014 PERRONE,PETER 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00353614 12/03/2014 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 3,357.84 0.00 3,357.84 • AP 00353616 12/03/2014 PROVO ENGINEERING 11,642.00 0.00 11,642.00 AP 00353617 12/03/2014 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 2,429.59 0.00 " 2,429.59 AP 00353618 12/03/2014 R C EMPLOYEE ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE 17,000.00. 0.00 17,000.00 AP 00353619 12/03/2014 RAMIREZ,JOSE.' 996.64 0.00 996.64 AP 00353620 12/03/2014 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL INC 452.51 0.00 452.51 AP 00353621 12/03/2014 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00353622 12/03/2014 RIPPETOE LAW P C 170.00 0.00 170.00 AP 00353623 12/03/2014 ROADI-INE PRODUCTS INC 1,244.13 0.00 1,244.13 AP 00353624 12/03/2014 ROBLES, RAUL P 375.00 0.00 375.00 AP 00353625 12/03/2014 RODRIGUEZ INC,R Y 1,123.35 0.00 1,123.35 AP 00353626 12/03/2014 RYAN,CAROL 28.00 0.00 28.00 AP 00353627 12/03/2014 S.CALIF.MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDERATION 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00353628 12/03/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 311.00 . 0.00 311.00 AP 00353629 12/03/2014 SECURITY BANK OF CALIFORNIA 0.00 9,202.16 9,202.16 Al' 00353630 12/03/2014 SERVICE SOLUTIONS GROUP 109.96 0.00 109.96 AP 00353631 12/03/2014 SHORT LOAD CONCRETE 360.72 0.00 360.72 AP .00353632 12/03/2014 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 1,231.09 0.00 1,231.09 AP 00353633 12/03/2014 SJM INDUSTRICAL RADIO 8,061.20 0.00 8,061.20 AP 00353634 12/03/2014 SLP COMMUNICATIONS 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00353635 12/03/2014 SLS 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00353636 12/03/2014 SMITH,LUCINDA CHRISTINE 500.00 • 0.00 500.00 AP 00353637 12/03/2014 SO CAL SANDBAGS 486.00 0.00 486.00 . AP 00353638 12/03/2014 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5,993.28 243.58 6,236.86..• AP 00353639 12/03/2014 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 3,080.00 0.00 3,080.00 AP 00353645 12/03/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,865.01 1,925.55 14,790.56"' Al' 00353646 12/03/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17,321.17 0.00 17,321.17 AP 00353647 12/03/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,296.91 0.00 1,296.91 AP 00353648 12/03/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,287.77 0.00 2,287.77 AP 00353649 12/03/2014 SPOONFACTORY 210.00 0.00 210.00 AP 00353650 12/03/2014 STANLEY R HOFFMAN ASSOCIATES INC 4,100.00 0.00 4,100.00 AP 00353651. 12/03/2014 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 2,312.68 0.00 2,312.68 AP 00353652 12/03/2014 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 16.52 0.00 16.52 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date; 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:15:18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P8 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 • Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353653 12/03/2014 TOT LOT PROS 9,850.00 0.00 9,850.00 AP 00353654 12/03/2014 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL ' 483.00 0.00 - 483.00 AP 00353655 12/03/2014 UPS 62.58 0.00 62.58 AP 00353656 12/03/2014 UTILIQUEST 8,191.15 0.00 8,191.15 AP 00353657 12/03/2014 VALDEZ,TRINA 134.40 0.00 134.40 AP 00353658 12/03/2014 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 107,654.13 0.00 . 107,654.13 AP 00353659 12/03/2014 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1,225.95 116.58 1,342.53 *** AP 00353660 12/03/2014 VICTORIA GARDENS 1,072.98 0.00 1,072.98 • AP 00353661 12/03/2014 VIGILANT SOLUTIONS 196,604.00 0.00 196,604.00 AP 00353662 12/03/2014 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 2,717.90 0.00 2,717.90 AP 00353663 12/03/2014 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 53.26 0.00 53.26 AP 00353664 12/03/2014 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,152.29 0.00 1,152.29 AP 00353665 12/03/2014 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 234.85 0.00 234.85 AP 00353666 12/03/2014 WESTCOAST MEDIA 900.50 0.00 900.50 AI' 00353667 12/03/2014 WESTLAND GROUP INC 17,932.00 0.00 17,932.00 AP 00353668 12/03/2014 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 437.50 0.00 437.50 AP 00353669 12/03/2014 WSS EUROSTAR INC 1,041.00 0.00 1,041.00 AP 00353670 12/03/2014 XEROX CORPORATION 1,987.97 0.00 1,987.97 AP 00353671 12/03/2014 XL STORAGE 895.00 0.00 895.00 AP 00353672 12/03/2014 ZEE MEDICAL INC 2,185.00 0.00 2,185.00 AP 00353673 12/03/2014 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 3,270.78 0.00 3,270.78 AP 00353674 12/04/2014 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC - 5,513.10 0.00 5,513.10 AP 00353675 12/04/2014 ABC LOCKSMITHS 2,129.53 0.00 2,129.53 AP 00353676 12/04/2014 AGILINE LLC 5,600.00 0.00 5,600,00 Al' 00353677 12/04/2014 CALSENSE 1,976.84 0.00 1,976.84 AP 00353678 12/04/2014 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC ' 0.00 1,255.78 1,255.78 AP 00353679 12/04/2014 COMP U ZONE 1,982.44 0.00 1,982.44 AP 00353681 12/04/2014 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81,439.86 755.20 82,195.06*** AP 00353682 12/04/2014 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 24.47 246.82 • 271.29*** AP 00353683 12/04/2014 EMCOR SERVICE 17,187.00 0.00 17,187.00 AP 00353684 12/04/2014 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 3,388.28 0.00 3,388.28 AP 00353685 12/04/2014 FORD OF UPLAND INC 154.89 0.00 154.89 AP 00353686 12/04/2014 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 3,985.41 0.00 3,985.41 AP 00353687 12/04/2014 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 159.03 0.00 159.03 AP 00353688 12/04/2014 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 67.76 0.00 6776 • AP 00353689 12/04/2014 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,008.72 0.00 1,008.72 AP 00353690 12/04/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.20 0.00 55.20 AP 00353691 12/04/2014 SUNRISE FORD 121:11 0.00 121.11 AP 00353692 12/04/2014 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 17,073.34 0.00 17,073.34 AP 00353693 12/04/2014 VISTA PAINT 810.38 0.00 810.38 EP 00004762 11/26/2014 AECOM 54,489.50 0.00 54,489.50 EP 00004763 11/26/2014 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9,205.00 0.00 9,205.00 EP 00004764 11/26/2014 FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC 63,962.47 0.00 63,962.47 EP 00004765 11/26/2014 RCPFA 9,999.66 0.00 9,999.66 EP 00004766 11/26/2014 VIASYN INC 5,014.62 0.00 5,014.62 EP 00004767 11/26/2014 RCCEA 1,325.00 0.00 1,325.00 EP 00004769 11/26/2014 AHUMADA,ALEXANDER R 0.00 846.58 846.58 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait 1 Time: 14:15:18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P9 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount EP 00004770 11/26/2014 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 535.72 535.72 EP 00004771 11/26/2014 BANTAU,VICTORIA 0.00 893.87 893.87 EP 00004772 11/26/2014 BAZAL,SUSAN 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 EP 00004773 11/26/2014 BERRY,DAVID 0.00 964.58 964.58 EP 00004774 11/26/2014 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 832.95 832.95 ■ EP 00004775 11/26/2014 CAMPBELL,GERALD 0.00 1,289.65 1,289.65 EP 00004776 11/26/2014 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 717.76 717.76 EP 00004777 11/26/2014 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 964.58 964.58 EP 00004778 11/26/2014 CORCORAN, ROBERT 0.00 505.59 505.59 EP 00004779 11/26/2014 COX.KARL. 0.00 535.72 535.72 EP 00004780 11/26/2014 CRANE,RALPH 0.00 1,353.64 1,353.64 EP 00004781 11/26/2014 CROSSLAND,WILBUR 0.00 470.94 470.94 EP 00004782 11/26/2014 DAGUE,JAMES 0.00 1,130.18 1,130.18 El' 00004783 11/26/2014 DE ANTONIO,SUSAN 0.00 505.59 505.59 EP 00004784 11/26/2014 DOMINICK,SAMUEL A. 0.00 832.95 832.95 El' 00004785 11/26/2014 EAGLESON,MICHAEL 0.00 1,504.93 1,504.93 EP 00004786 11/26/2014 FRITCHEY,JOHN D. 0.00 470.94 470.94 EP 00004787 11/26/2014 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 1,130.18 1,130.18 EP 00004788 11/26/2014 INTERLICCHI A, ROSALYN 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 EP 00004789 11/26/2014 LANE,WILLIAM 0.00 1,504.93 1,504.93 EP 00004790 11/26/2014 LEE,ALLAN 0.00 1,472.85 1,472.85 EP 00004791 11/26/2014 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1,102.77 1,102.77 EP 00004792 1 1/26/2014 LONGO,JOE 0.00 175.97 175.97 EP 00004793 11/26/2014 LUTTRULL,DARRELL 0.00 717.76 717.76 EP 00004794 11/26/2014 MACKALL, BENJAMIN 0.00 175.97 175.97 EP 00004795 11/26/2014 MAYFIELD,RON 0.00 1,353.64 1,353.64 EP 00004796 11/26/2014 MCKEE,JOHN 0.00 535.72 535.72 EP 00004797 11/26/2014 MCMILLEN,LINDA , 0.00 615.52 615.52 El' 00004798 11/26/2014 MCNEIL,KENNETH 0.00 944.68 944.68 EP 00004799 11/26/2014 MICHAEL, L.DENNIS 0.00 832.95 832.95 EP 00004800 11/26/2014 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 2,265.72 2,265.72 EP 00004801 11/26/2014 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 964.58 964.58 EP 00004802 11/26/2014 NAUMAN,MICHAEL 0.00 964.58 964.58 EP 00004803 11/26/2014 NEE,RON 0.00 1,795.43 1,795.43 EP 00004804 1.1/26/2014 NELSON,MARY JANE 0.00 175.97 175.97 EP 00004805 11/26/2014 PLOUNG,MICHAEL J 0.00 188.23 188.23 EP 00004806 11/26/2014 POST,MICHAEL R 0.00 1,717.64 1,717.64 EP 00004807 11/26/2014 PROULX,PATRICK 0.00 1,504.93 1,504.93 EP 00004808 11/26/2014 ROEDER,JEFF 0.00 1,504.93 1,504.93 EP 00004809 11/26/2014 SALISBURY,THOMAS 0.00 832.95 832.95 EP 00004810 11/26/2014 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 964.58 964.58 El' 00004811 11/26/2014 SPAGNOLO,SAM 0.00 470.94 470,94 El' 00004812 11/26/2014 SPAIN,WILLIAM 0.00 717.76 717.76 EP 00004813 11/26/2014 SULLIVAN,JAMES 0.00 778.76 778.76 EP 00004814 11/26/2014 TAYLOR,SIEVE 0.00 1,102.77 1,102.77 EP 00004815 11/26/2014 TULEY.TERRY 0.00 1,130.18 1,130.18 EP 00004816 11/26/2014 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 1,157.44 1,157.44 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 14:15:18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P10 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register I 1/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount EP 00004817 11/26/2014 WOLFE,JACKIE 0.00 617.32 617.32 EP 00004818 11/26/2014 YOWELL,TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,353.64 1,353.64 El' 00004819 11/26/2014 KILMER,STEPHEN 0.00 1,289.65 1,289.65 EP 00004820 11/26/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,480,220.61 1,289.65 1,289.65 *** Total City: $4,442,574.53 Total Fire: $409,420.13 Grand Total: $4,851,994.66 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: V LOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:15:18 • P11 P > �o n ° m m r N W d n n rn o c > N N N A N N d ¢O I V 6 r r r r n p C LL W r r• n O LL c 0 n L m o LL g O a.¢ei L In• C a E o N N N 0 A N e0- co N c LL O co r •TL-• CC W O r r r r • O 0 = 0 0 r r a E Vc L 0 E . > N 0 EY r d 0 OA) 0 09 r M U) N �-'.r R 0 0 a C C O CO N r r O2 c N 0. `o a) a° Er n N m " i r u q y A m m CO ¢ E H r 1- r r r r y Q a) O 0 N L - c o ° O n m 8 0 ° p E O- 10 N 10 A l7 p W X �{ 6 to ei ,- t7 O LAN ° r m a n c co o p = NI,- o 0 0 CO h N -0 O T Lri N O Q O) H r a' r .- Y GI> co Q O A [7 N G.G1 a •L r 0 0 0 0 m p n b CO o NC Oi Q N r N N _U T Q GI N CO O�_ r C N CO c Q O 0) £C N a) e m y E o i/ CO •C O N t0 r W L N OS vI L O N n c 0 _ Y C C 1- O tD O L n A O O C m N N O N O n N N d N N _•YL O G y 7 m O (N O p) f N Y U_ �1, yyLJ� N m N ` N m N p N 3.� W .O ' W A N op Q U O .cn '=L LL �Ol a m °0 0 0 n it .€ '�to 0 a Z 0 .1 6- N N N O .a ci a to c U o 1 c -- ._ o aL C 0 t • 0 c Z 2.. l) N N N y 0 L O .� O a c m 00 00 00 00 w Lq n W 01 m co , m u-i m 6 0 0 0 0 r y n o 0 0 °o W Q N C O O T = P12 4•2 or.- m m W 0 0 m m N m m m 0 0 m 0 m CO CO m W a O ' 0 'C N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 CC Q CO J 0 N N N N N N N.N N N N N N N N N N N N N N n 0 tO CO m r r f O O ,- n 0 0 co 0) n m m N n W CL 5 O r r CO CO N O 17 N N N N 0 0 0 0 R J • a 0 CO m m V m m 0 r 0 (� 0 r Q to m m « .O ai z 0 0 0 0 0 ro 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O'c o n CO m CO CO N- LO CO CU N m co V 0' co m ,- n 0 » n m m to m V m p m m CO 1 N men 0 0 0 n m o m o n a 04 Q q ^ 0 ` ! CO N f C'1_ m f f f f ` N N ! '_ _ f n O a N N O O O m O n 0 0 0 n .r 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r 0 O O N N 0 M 0 O m N. N m m CO 0 r O o n co N o e 0 r A ' 0. n. r N O 0 M C O C O M M C O M M O I M M O M M C O M M CO M M a CO O N O O O O O lO N N 10 0 CO N N 0 m Q Q • y Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q o o E O O O o 0 O O O o 0 0 o N m 0 0 0 0 N r 0 V 0 m m 0 m O m O m O m N O O n 0 0 0 O e 0 N d q N 0 0 r C. m O O O n O O 0 n CU O r Ln. N 0 0 r 191' 0 r 0 r N N r 0 • • O N N n 0 0 0 0 O r O 0 0 O 0 0 N O O 10 h 0 0 N O 0 N ° co co 0 m 10 /130C) .- 003 .- O O m n O O n CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 in N n m m 0 0 0 e O e N O n n e o O e d O O 0 6 0 V 0 b 0 0 01 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N 0 0 O O 0 Q 0 0 N 0 C) h Y n n CO CO CO 0 O O n O O n O 0 0 m O O m 0 0 O CO 0 m 1+) 0 n n 0 0 0 O O) o m o O Oi r O) O O Oi o O o f0 O 10 M O m 0 00N- 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 O CO m m 0 0 0 CO 0 0 m CO CO M o e e 0 a_ 0) 0 0 v o D) 0 0 O) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 M CO p . O) 0) N fl e r C) N r N r N (6 N r r N N m O N N - • ? N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 10 m 0 m 100000000000000000 m co O co 0 co 0 q m N n 0 n Q 0 0 0 N O 0 m C) 0 0 0 m m O N N 0 01 0 N > 0 co n CO n co 0 e Q 0 e N O N N 0 r CO m N CO_ CO n N N N". n_ a C) 0 0 e m N N 0 CO 0 m_ O N N _ CO OI 0 CO 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 Q Q N 0 N O CO i.,- ` e n 0 m N 0 0000 O N 0 N 0 0 0 n 0 0 CO CO CO e e V 0 m 0 0 0) V 01 0 0 CO CO 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 C) C) C) 0 ca — y 0 0 N e e N 0 r r N N N N N N r N m e - N N r N C E e o £ E v • �1� N C W N m m 000000000 000000 000000 000 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) C CO v d d d 0 d d 0 d o d d d d d d d d o o o o d d 0 > 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 'y A O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 O 0 O o °0 0 0 O C I M `O - 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 6 6 6-6 6 6 6 0 0 o m o o 0 al 1 `,1" 4 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 m CO CO �y (n L V m O m O O O m O O O O O O O p O O O O 0 CO 0 0 0 0 N V N CN N Of 0 ) p N N C L d a 0- cdE CD iC� o o .y L ' Z O 9 CU CU 0 v Q 1n CI n CU a C) C) e e CO CO CO CO Q CO 0 O CO A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Or O 0 O /\ a r`j L 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V m r r (� O O r n 0 0 0 0 n co co 0 N- CO r O 0 r r r (`) 1` N O N CU N r N CC) 0)) O N r 0 r 0. 1, a Cl- m m to r e �n m A r m A a mo o m m 000000000000000. 00 0 r 0 0 01 u - • � 00 CCU to C d 0 o a Q ai 0 o z r 0. 1 0. 1 0 00 V O. a •I CO to- U. O O O O °o m F cc O e H p Y Y Y Y Y U U U U n O O U 0 Z 0 Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y Y Y CO Y N W Q Q Q Q Q Z Z Z Z Z U U' U' U Z Z Z e Z w J W 2 m m m m m Q Q Q Q Q H H H H m N m Q O Q m N H H H H H m co co co CO Z Z Z Z 0 In m CO U N ❑ O O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Q Q Q Z O Q Z w W w w w W Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q H ti Q 02 < K 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O H O U U 0 0 0 0 0 J > 2 2222 W W W W W W W W w W Z 0 O 11' 1' O' 1' 222222222 H H 0 E co z Q Z 0 y Z rn Q Q Q Q Q 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ O O_ O_ O_ 0_ Q Q Q o) O 0) f U rn 0 W E LL LL LL LL LL Z Z Z A S I U a W N J Q 4a S14w 51 41 41 41 4 a 4a 4a 5141414 a 515141 Q g Q LLHtn Q w Q 0 W W w W w W W W w w W w w W W W W V W V LL Z K V U C ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 C 0 C Q d W C 0 1O W L U W W W W W W W W W W W L O W W W n w S O > m J B LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 3 LL 9 U 2 K B O � O O O a n S a 0 0 0 N i! C N > 0 C O t LL 0 0. • 0 C U r N 0 n 0 CO N It n m 0 N 'Q 0 O co 0 0 V C) 0 r O O ) m 0 N CO 0 V m N V m 0 V CO V 0 C E o to co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 m in' • co S > m d N d 0 'O 0 T 0 0 C 5 o 0 0 O O CO C O) m W N °I Y. Y l m N r Z' 2 a i a p o LL U o K 00 O Z F N N C) >O y O • V Q X 0 1 O w w m co w0 m m m o O O V O V N O Q N N 0 0 C ' CO COO CO COO CO U) co C O y r 0 O > d m co co N N n N N N CO CO M M m n M ` m 0 n N o) C U J 0 LL m m C m C N m in N N m N C C 0 I- M rL ' 2 K P13 N •0A co - CCa ^ w 30 N N m v 0 LL „The• E N 0 0 2 o , p ai .0.L' rc 0. Q q f7 C] CO O _ 0 6 a f 2 N c0 0 N ))) CO N CO N I': h N at co • O N T < < 0 0 0 E O 0 a o r m 20: '- c N o 0 0 i n 0 9 N N O 0 > e m n p et Y 0 I� 0 N n o oD .0,8 m 0 m o 0) 0 d 0 =• oo 00 00 a To NI' 0 n 0 n i at Y0 Co P A CO y o o O N as *0 d y C 0 £ a E m C d d O 0 0 00 °O N CO O C N 1p 00 o OO m r CO O 0 0 0 n O c I CO m 0 0 0 0.N CO y I o o °o 0 O d - N N a a` ._S d E " O o 0 LL C O Z q A O O U Cl- I L 0 N N L 3 N N 0.7 a 00 0 0 n IC 0 q 0 N 0 N 4 A N N Q m 0 1� 0 0 m a , o f 0 0 0 0 2 6. U O w 0 m . • W m z 0 i K ¢ Q a W Z C a S W W C.) C7 9 3 • o r a 0 it 0 . 0 0 C.) N r > O O C , , 8 V 0 d 0 `o = 0 y o CO al N < m ? 0. a $ h O 0 o 0 U tO co a P14 a, wa ° O K Q n 0) LL al 0 o f o a y D ¢ Ty c o a O a— LL n U 5 O N O N N O ) 0 0 0 f 0 d NN 2 LL' O N N h M I, In N 1 In m y O n o• to CO n N O • N o In N N pN > N p V C 0 R N LO N N i. O 0 CO •` W N C t d CO N Q • V C d a) toi n N t+ @ y O • P N 0 C co `m n w +0+ d a A to N 0 C 0 .0 N a• c P E d o o > 0 LL 0 0 Z �q C 3 0- Yo 0 Qi a O 0 o to 00 o o Lam o a > al O Q m A co Z u CC z 0 LL Q U LL . O 0 as • Y c c O• ¢ m E u) co W » 0 z z 0 > O_ m c z u a > > c Q 0 = N N * U c 0 0 E• o I- 0 C• V o 0 W O C ° up U 0 V .0 a o N V O a °o o N N y p U 0.h D C • w a1t5 O CL < r LL O o f o ai o • tt m° a° ap f n V N O h 0 N 1` 0 V CO O m 0 0 O 0 C N O N O P 0 N w 0 n O n Nl P q O YI m f') . m 6 6 Y 0 P CT) °o CO m •on oi N , 1- 0 m w w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 C q O O O O 0 0 0 00. ; O O O O O O O E. O O 0 0 Et o 6 05 0 0 0 a– 0 0 0 N N O • V r 0 • N w o o 0 o m CO CO m 0 0 0 0 CO m A _ ° 0CD m ° ° to 2 o 0 to N7 ° o m m CO ✓ y a'❑0 °0 00 4a — a N N N w d E c y C. o p W >. Z F ✓ C >. O7. GI 01 m 7 o2Z• o ;« 'a 1.- ❑ LL •Q — C m . W V E .L Q N LL o N °N m U CL r y e O 0).2c O re m J2 E N > ❑ • X Z LL 0 Z 0 w z 0 ❑ Z co LL Z Z Q Q c. U -I . Y U- w E w 0 E i o = 0 0 0 0 0 E Q a E m a al .0 .0 a .0 �" N ¢ N N Z 0 Co H H N lil N L U _T Z ❑ !� C t D LL O C 2 0 2 3 C C C .2 a C 0 7 C O 0 2 LL 7 O a 0 CO 0 • C E °O a 0 0 ° V m c a 0$ c > Y 0 = m m 00 0 . c m T P rn c N < 5 t` a ` CL < °o -0 °o N U O m to 0 0A to 0 V N C a O P U J y CO y IL m el - f 0 P16 STAFF REPORT k ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: December 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Principal Civil Enginee Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 7635702 IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,222.13, FOR THE REMEDIATION AND DEMOLITION SERVICES FOR THE PROPERTIES AT 9547 AND 9561 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. FD13-010 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 7635702 in the amount of $11,222.13, for the Remediation and Demolition Services for the Properties at 9547 and 9561 San Bernardino Road project, Contract No. FD13-010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Laird Construction Co., Inc. 9460 Lucas Ranch Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-5797 Respectfull submitted, ( AeCir}. ark A.-Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD/SH:Is P17 A. OR r l I I. I j ..■ ILLSI' RD ILL IDE R 1 LSO AV WILSON AV SON V :EEC. I. •© t1H111_•-, BAkY�.S r t....,_ te_ilsol!_�-W_■ ir.17...__ .. 1111111111 - tots di Pr (12 .11111MMIgralBERIFAI O roman. JERSEY BL piam \ mammy tinERSE I CHURCH ST I i k !__ --- ------- i i I I -- - I ; _-r- `,� I ■ I ! - --/� �, SAN BERNARDINO R . I � 'LI I > lLjiJ%iE _ I - �j ARtOW RT I 0 --_� - - _. I. - --T: - PROJECT I < ! z! 9TH ST : j 1 JERSEY BL i I I I i ! JEW, Vicinity Map REMEDIATION AND DEMOLITION SERVICES FOR THE PROPERTIES AT 9547 & 9561 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD -. P18 STAFF REPORT `S� I ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP LJ RANCHO Date: December 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FIRE DISTRICT SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District adopt the attached resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2014-15 salary schedules for Fire District job classifications. BACKGROUND The Fire Board traditionally adopts salary resolutions biannually for those classifications employed by the Fire District. These resolutions are updated to reflect changes in salaries, steps, additions and deletions of classifications, changes in job titles, and other terms of employment. There are no changes, additions or deletions from the previous salary schedules adopted by resolution on June 26, 2014. Attachment 1. Resolution 14-051 • 2. Salary Schedule for Fire Management Group Classifications 3. Salary Schedule for Fire Union Job Classifications 4. Salary Schedule for Fire Support Services Association Job Classifications 5. Salary Schedule for Fire Support Services Association Part-Time Job Classifications • P19 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-051 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the District that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has previously adopted salary resolutions that established salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment; • and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of. the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the attached salary schedules for the Fire Union, Fire Management Employees Group and Fire Support Services Association (Attachments 1-4). P20 Resolution#14-051 FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2015 A B C D E F COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICIAN 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 29.64 31.12 Hourly 1,950.59 2,048.12 2,150.52 2,258.05 2,370.96 2,489.50 Bi-Weekly 4,226.27 4,437.60 4,659.47 4,892.44 5,137.07 5,393.93 Monthly EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 34.90 36.69 38.56 40.53 42.39 44.51 Hourly COORDINATOR 2,792.07 2,934.86 3,084.95 3,242.72 3,391.59 3,561.17 Bi-Weekly 6,049.00 6,359.00 6,684.00 7,026.00 7,348.00 7,715.40 Monthly EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 37.51 39.38 41.35 43.42 45.59 47.87 Hourly ADMINISTRATOR 3,000.67 3,150.71 3,308.24 3,473.65 3,647.34 3,829.70 Bi-Weekly 6,501.46 6,826.53 7,167.86 7,526.25 7,902.56 8,297.69 Monthly FIRE EQUIPMENT APPRENTICE 18.58 19.51 20.48 21.51 22.58 23.71 Hourly MECHANIC 1,486.16 1,560.47 1,638.49 1,720.42 1,806.44 1,896.77 Bi-Weekly 3,220.02 3,381.02 3,550.07 3,727.58 3,913.96 4,109.66 Monthly FIRE EQUIPMENT LEAD MECHANIC 25.60 26.88 28.23 29.64 31.12 32.67 Hourly 2,048.12 2,150.52 2,258.05 2,370.95 2,489.50 2,613.98 Bi-Weekly 4437.59 4659.47 4892.44 5137.06 5393.92 5,663.62 Monthly FIRE EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 23.22 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 29.64 Hourly 1,857.70 1,950.59 2,048.12 2,150.53 2,258.05 2,370.96 Bi-Weekly 4,025.02 4,226.27 4,437.59 4,659.47 4,892.45 5,137.07 Monthly FIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 23.14 24.29 25.51 26.78 28.12 29.53 Hourly TECHNICIAN 1,850.93 1,943.47 2,040.64 2,142.68 2,249.81 2,362.30 Bi-Weekly 4,010.34 4,210.85 4,421.40 4,642.47 4,874.59 5,118.32 Monthly FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST 24.49 25.72 27.00 28.35 29.77 31.26 Hourly INSPECTION I 1,959.35 2,057.32 2,160.19 2,268.20 2,381.61 2,500.69 Bi-Weekly 4,245.26 4,457.52 4,680.40 4,914.42 5,160.15 5,418.15 Monthly FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST 27.00 28.35 29.77 31.26 32.82 34.46 Hourly INSPECTION II 2,160.18 2,268.19 2,381.60 2,500.69 2,625.72 2,757.00 Bi-Weekly 4,680.40 4,914.42 5,160.14 5,418.16 5,689.06 5,973.51 Monthly FIRE SHOP SUPERVISOR 30.72 32.26 33.87 35.56 37.34 39.21 Hourly 2,457.74 2,580.63 2,709.66 2,845.14 2,987.40 3,136.77 Bi-Weekly 5,325.11 5,591.36 5,870.93 6,164.48 6,472.70 6,796.34 Monthly MAINTENANCE OFFICER 34.92 36.67 38.50 40.42 42.45 44.57 Hourly 2,793.57 2,933.25 3,079.92 3,233.91 3,395.61 3,565.39 Bi-Weekly 6,052.74 6,355.38 6,673.15 7,006.81 7,357.16 7,725.02 Monthly • P21 Resolution #14-051 FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2015 . A B C D E F MANAGEMENT AIDE 24.01 25.24 26.53 27.88 29.16 . 30.62 Hourly 1,920.76 2,018.98 2,122.24 2,230.77 2,333.18 2,449.84 Bi-Weekly 4,164.00 4,377.00 4,601.00 4,836.00 5,058.00 5,310.90 Monthly MANAGEMENT ANALYST I 27.88 29.31 30.81 32.39 33.87 35.56 Hourly 2,230.77 2,344.85 2,464.76 2,590.81 2,709.76 2,845.25 Bi-Weekly 4,833.00 5,080.00 5,340.00 5,613.00 5,871.00 6,164.55 Monthly MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 32.06 33.70 35.43 37.24 38.95 40.90 Hourly 2,565.09 2,696.28 2,834.17 2,979.11 3,115.88 3,271.67 Bi-Weekly 5,557.00 5,842.00 6,140.00 6,454.00 6,751.00 7,088.55 Monthly MANAGEMENT ANALYST III 34.90 36.69 38.56 40.53 42.39 44.51 Hourly 2,792.07 2,934.86 3,084.95 3,242.72 3,391.59 3,561.17 Bi-Weekly 6,049.00 6,359.00 6,684.00 7,026.00 7,348.00 7,715.40 Monthly OFFICE SERVICES CLERK 16.85 17.71 18.62 19.57 20.47 21.49 Hourly 1,347.98 1,416.91 1,489.37 1,565.54 1,637.41 1,719.28 'Bi-Weekly 2,922.00 3,072.00 3,229.00 3,394.00 3,550.00 3,727.50 Monthly OFFICE SPECIALIST I 15.25 16.03 16.85 17.71 18.52 19.45 Hourly 1,220.00 1,282.39 1,347.98 1;416.91 1,481.96 1,556.06 Bi-Weekly 2,645.00 2,780.00 2,922.00 3,072.00 3,213.00 3,373.65 Monthly OFFICE SPECIALIST II 16.85 17.71 18.62 19.57 20.47 21.49 Hourly 1,347.98 1,416.91 1,489.37 1,565.54 1,637.41 1,719.28 Bi-Weekly 2,922.00 3,072.00 3,229.00 3,394.00 3,550.00 3,727.50 Monthly PLANS EXAMINER-FIRE 32.08 33.68 35.37 37.13 38.99 40.94 Hourly 2,566.22 2,694.54 2,829.26 2,970.73 3,119.26 3,275.22 Bi-Weekly 5,560.15 5,838.16 6,130.07 6,436.57 6,758.39 7,096.31 Monthly PUBLIC EDUCATION 27.00 28.35 29.77 31.26 32.82 34.46 Hourly SPECIALIST 2,160.18 2,268.19 2,381.60 2,500.69 2,625.72 2,757.01 Bi-Weekly 4,680.40 4,914.42 5,160.14 5,418.16 5,689.06 5,973.51 Monthly SECRETARY 19.09 20.04 21.04 22.09 23.20 24.36 Hourly 1,526.81 1,603.15 1,683.31 1,767.47 1,855.85 1,948.64 Bi-Weekly 3,308.09 3,473.50 3,647.17 3,829.53 4,021.00 4,222.06 Monthly SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE 24.49 25.73 27.01 28.36 29.77 31.26 Hourly SECRETARY 1,959.30 2,057.26 2,160.12 2,268.13 2,381.54 2,500.62 Bi-Weekly 4,245.15 4,457.40 4,680.27 4,914.29 5,160.00 5,418.00 Monthly P22 Resolution # 14-051 FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES PART-TIME HOURLY • SALARY SCHEDULE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2015 A B C D E F COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICIAN 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 29.64 31.12 Hourly EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 41.14 43.20 45.36 47.62 . 50.01 52.51 Hourly QUALITY IMPROVEMENT NURSE FIRE CLERK 10.24 10.75 11.29 11.85 12.45 • 13.07 Hourly FIRE EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 23.22 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 . 29.64 Hourly FIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 23.14 24.29 25.51 26.78 28.12 29.53 Hourly • TECHNICIAN • FIRE PREVENTION ASSISTANT 10.24 10.75 11.29 11.85 12.45 13.07 Hourly TEMPORARY/PART-TIME FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST 24.49 25.72 27.00 28.35 29.77 31.26 Hourly INSPECTION I MANAGEMENT AIDE 24.02 25.22 26.49 27.81 29.20 30.66 Hourly MANAGEMENT ANALYST I 27.88 29.28 30.74 32.28 33.89 35.59 Hourly MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 32.04 33.64 35.33 37.09 38.95 40.90 Hourly OFFICE SERVICES CLERK 16.85 17.69 18.58 19.51 20.48 21.51 Hourly OFFICE SPECIALIST I 15.25 16.01 16.81 17.65 18.54 19.46 Hourly OFFICE SPECIALIST II 16.85 17.69 18.58 19.51 20.48 21.50 Hourly PLANS EXAMINER- FIRE 32.08 33.68 35.37 37.13 38.99 40.94 Hourly QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 27.79 29.18 30.64 32.17 33.78 35.47 Hourly SPECIALIST P23 STAFF REPORT ` CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE L J Date: December 10, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA • To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chair and Members of the Board John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager By: Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II Subject: Review and approval of the Housing Successor's Fiscal Year 2013/14 Annual Report RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Housing Successor Agency take the following actions: 1. Review and approve the Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2013/14. 2. Authorize staff to make administrative changes to the Annual Report upon completion of the CAFR. • 3. Authorize the transmittal of the Annual Report to the appropriate State agencies. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Pursuant to SB 341 a Housing Successor Agency is required to file an Annual Report of its activities within six months of the Agency's fiscal year end. This report is required to contain the following information: 1.) The amount deposited to the Low Moderate Income Housing Assets Fund (LMIHAF), distinguishing any amounts deposited for items listed on the ROPS. 2.) A statement of the balance in the LMIHAF as the close of the fiscal year, distinguishing any amounts held for items listed on the ROPS. 3.) A description of expenditures from the LMIHAF by category, including, but not limited to, expenditures for (a) monitoring and preserving the long-term affordability of units subject to affordability restrictions or covenants and administrative expenses; (b) homeless prevention and rapid re-housing services; and (c) development of affordable housing. 4.) The statutory value of real property owned by the housing successor, the value of loans and grants receivable, and the sum the sum of these two amounts. 5.) A description of any transfers of LMIHAF funds made to another housing successor in the previous fiscal year. • P24 REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE HOUSING SUCCESSOR'S FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 ANNUAL PAGE 2 REPORT DECEMBER 10,2014 6.) A description of any project for which the housing successor receives or holds property tax revenue pursuant to the ROPS and the status of that project. 7.) For interests in real property acquired by the former agency prior to February 1, 2012, a status update on compliance with Section 33334.16. For interest in real property acquired by the housing successor on or after February 1, 2012, a status update on the project. 8.) A description of any outstanding obligations pursuant to Section 33413 that remained to transfer to the housing successor on February 1, 2012, the housing successor's progress in meeting these obligations, and the housing successor's plans to meet unmet obligations. 9.) Housing successor must determine the % of housing for seniors and person of all ages within the previous 10-years. Senior housing units may not exceed 50% of the total units restricted. 10.) The amount of excess surplus, the amount of time the housing successor has had excess surplus, and the housing successor's plan for eliminating the excess surplus. The Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2013/14 is being transmitted to the Housing Successor . Agency in accordance with the applicable legislation, and contains all of the required information as outlined above. Some of the balance and expenditure amounts are based on the audit and preparation of the City's CAFR. The CAFR is currently being reviewed and is anticipated to be finalized prior to the end of December. Therefore, the balances and expenditures included in the annual report are draft numbers as noted. Staff has requested authorization to make administrative changes to reflect any updates in the CAFR. Following the approval by the Housing Successor, the report will be sent to the appropriate State agencies for review. Respectfully submitted, �J , Linda D. Daniels Assistant City Manager Attachment—Annual Report • F .Y . 2013/14 Housing Successor Annual R eport .........,_ min . _ .. , ., li 4 I 41 .., ,- -, 0 - ---:' ....,, 1 Ti .''''4,,:`::` .. _,-,,2,9,-. — . , ,— w..e...r. 11,,t-,,,..-- iii&:,...,p„:„.7.: LL(.47....,..1,;,.,,,,L ..„4 D .te.4* LI, :. .t- ,.., ,'. ;.,;„ ,..77,4„,.., ,,t.i... , ,,,... , .... ..,,, , „v..: I rs,.. :%,.. til.' 'r;:-: ■:l'il - 11 ".'''V,4'il;'' -7,,IL L=14 - - --- it!-' .,t.,' - k.er...*, :" -:*''' - , . , , -1.... := " . fil " .....':. 14/0 ' 1 Isom—' if(146.0r--- i' ', kl . ' t1-9,..atemp, . , ' i ' ,1 • 4;(r."' r -, , . . -11 , i i ,. ., .....----- , ---''', 4., , f .',' i;:! ':,''' 1, , . - r '"-). ', 1".1 ' V,•ff:4:.:74-SI ''''''''a- ' „„,.. .=-- P26 Housing Successor Annual Report—2013/14 1.) The amount deposited to the LMIHAF, distinguishing any amounts deposited for items listed on the ROPS. A total of$ 1,070,802.341 was deposited to the LMIHAF during Fiscal Year 2013/14. The deposits primarily consisted of residual receipts associated with payments on loans related to • the development of low and moderate income multi-family housing financed by the former Redevelopment Agency, loan payoffs of first-time homebuyer loans, and loan payoff of equity . distributions. 2.) A statement of the balance in the LMIHAF as the close of the fiscal year, distinguishing any amounts held for items listed on the ROPS. As of the close of Fiscal Year 2013/14 the LMIHAF ended with a balance of$ 1,743,716.231. 3.) A description of expenditures from the LMIHAF by category, including, but not limited to, expenditures for(a)monitoring and preserving the long-term affordability of units subject to affordability restrictions or covenants and administrative expenses;(b)homeless prevention and rapid re-housing services;and(c)development of affordable housing. Activity Expenditure Administrative Costs 10,056.04 Homeless Prevention 124,164.00 Affordable Housing Dev. - Note:This number was provided from the draft CAFR and is subject to change upon completion of the CAFR. 4.) The statutory value of real property owned by the housing successor, the value of loans and grants receivable, and the sum of these two amounts. Loans Receivable as of June 30, 2014 Fair Value Ending of Land Loan Name/Description/Property Balance Secured by Loan NHDC (San Sevaine Villas) 8,956,502.01 N/A 1 This number was provided from the draft CAFR and is subject to change upon completion of the CAFR. • 1IPage • P27 Housing Successor Annual Report—2013/14 HB Housing(Woodhaven Manor) 11,058,120.84 N/A Rancho Workforce/Villagio 10,123,637.39 N/A Villa Pacifica 3,469,777.72 N/A LINC-Pepperwood 24,871,086.82 N/A SCH/NCR (Rancho Verde Village East) 7,073,828.84 N/A Heritage Pointe (SCHDC/Nat Core) 1,786,592.02 N/A Olen Jones Senior Apts. 4,342,172.00 N/A Villa Del Norte 9,308,814.85 N/A NHDC (San Sevaine Villas) 33,506,755.75 N/A Rancho Workforce/Villagio 18,814,228.92 N/A Forest City 12,291,228.91 N/A First-Time Homebuyer Program 3,975,698.00 N/A Total 149,578,444.07 5.) A description of any transfers of LMIHAF funds made to another housing successor in the previous fiscal year. There have been no transfers of LMIHAF funds to any other housing successor in the previous fiscal year. 6.) A description of any project for which the housing successor receives or holds property tax revenue pursuant to the ROPS and the status of that project. There are no projects which the housing successor receives or holds property tax revenue pursuant to the ROPS 7.) For interests in real property acquired by the former agency prior to February 1, 2012, a status update on compliance with Section 33334.16. For interest in real property acquired by the housing successor on or after February 1,2012, a status update on the project. 2IPaae P28 Housing Successor Annual Report—2013/14 In July 2014 the Housing Successor Agency acquired a 2.5 acre property for the purpose of constructing a 60-unit senior affordable rental housing complex. The project affordability agreement provides for 59 of the 60 1—and 2—bedroom units to be restricted to eligible seniors whose household incomes do not exceed 30%of the area median income; 12 units will be available for those whose income does not exceed 40%of the area median income; 24 units available to those whose income does not exceed 50%of area median income; and 17 units available for those whose income does not exceed 60%of area median income. The project is currently going through the entitlement phase and it is anticipated that the housing project will be completed in the first quarter of 2017. 8.) A description of any outstanding obligations pursuant to Section 33413 that remained to transfer to the housing successor on February 1,2012, the housing successor's progress in meeting these obligations, and the housing successor's plans to meet unmet obligations. There are no outstanding obligations that have been transferred to the housing successor agency on February 1, 2012. 9.) Housing successor must determine the%of housing for seniors and person of all ages within the previous 10-years. Senior housing units may not exceed 50%of the total units restricted. Housing Projects Completed Within the Last 10-years (2004-2014) Project Type #of Units San Sevaine Villas Family 223 Pepperwood Family 228 Villagio at Route 66 Family 131 Total 582 Previous Affordable Housing Accomplishments Prior to 2004 Project Type #of Units Las Casitas Family 14 Rancho Verde Family 104 Rancho Verde East Family 40 Monterey Village Family 110 Sycamore Springs Family 96 Sunset Heights Family 116 Villa Pacifica Senior 158 Heritage Pointe Senior 48 Olen Jones Sr.Apartments Senior 96 Total 782 3IPage P29 Housing Successor Annual Report—2013/14 10.)The amount of excess surplus, the amount of time the housing successor has had excess surplus, and the housing successor's plan for eliminating the excess surplus. At the end of the previous Fiscal Year 2013/14 the Housing Successor Agency ended with a balance of$ 802,425.931. At the end of this reporting period, Fiscal Year 2013/14 the Housing Successor Agency ends with a balance of$ 1,743,716.231. 1 This number was provided from the draft CAFR and is subject to change upon completion of the CAFR. • • • Mage CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P30 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353310 11/26/2014 A&V SOFTBALL 2,295.00 0.00 2,295.00 AP 00353311 11/26/2014 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 ' AP 00353312 11/26/2014 AKBAR,KAMRAN 500.00 0.00 500.00 Al' 00353313 11/26/2014 AROCHO,ALMA 654.00 0.00 654.00 AP 00353314 11/26/2014 ASSI SECURITY 1,502.00 0.00 1,502.00 AP 00353315 11/26/2014 AVANTS,MARGE 255.00 0.00 255.00 Al' 00353316 11/26/2014 13ALLAT, MAFIA 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00353317 11/26/2014 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 0.00 2,325.00 2,325.00 AP 00353318 11/26/2014 BLIND BOYS OF ALABAMA LLC 7,672.50 0.00 7,672.50 AP 00353319 11/26/2014 CALIFORNIA FRANCIISE TAX BOARD 186.75 0.00 186.75 AP 00353320 11/26/2014 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 0.00 50.00 Al' 00353321 11/26/2014 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 55.00 0.00 55.00 Al' 00353322 11/26/2014 CALPERS 124,197.09 7,742.95 131,940.04*** AP 00353323 11/26/2014 CARDENAS.TAKAKO 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00353324 11/26/2014 CIRIACKS.VALERIE ANN 75.00 0.00 75.00 AI' 00353325 11/26/2014 CLARK,KAREN 950.40 0.00 950.40 AP 00353326 11/26/2014 CLIMAI'EC LLC 5,474.75 0.00 5.474.75 AP 00353327 11/26/2014 COCIIERELL, DOREEN 96.00 0.00 96.00 AP 00353328 11/26/2014 CONFIRE JPA 0.00 50.254.43 50,254.43 AP 00353329 11/26/2014 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 8.14450 0.00 8.144.50 AP 00353330 11/26/2014 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 295.00 0.00 295.00 AP 00353331 11/26/2014 CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 390.00 390.00 780.00*** AP 00353332 11/26/2014 DATA ARC LLC 3.902.44 0.00 3.902.44 AP 00353333 11/26/2014 DAVID BENOIT MUSIC INC. 14.000.00 0.00 14,000.00 AP 00353334 11/26/2014 DESERT DIAMOND INDUSTRIES I.I.0 0.00 531.00 531.00 AP 00353335 11/26/2014 DOLLAR'TI TDE.GINGER 108.00 0.00 108.00 AP 00353336 11/26/2014 DUNN,ANN MARIE 732.00' • 0.00 732.00 AP 00353337 11/26/2014 EARLEY. IDA 343.20 0.00 343.20 AP 00353338 1 1/26/2014 EAS1'ERLING,RAY 268.80 0.00 268.80 AP 00353339 11/26/2014 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 48.00 0.00 48.00 AP 00353340 11/26/2014 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,045.00 0.00 3,045.00 Al' 00353341 11/26/2014 GOODFIELD.RICHARD 168.00 0.00 168.00 Al' 00353342 11/26/2014 GRAINGER 283.76 0.00 283.76 AP 00353343 11/26/2014 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 896.03 0.00 896.03 AP 00353344 11/26/2014 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00353345 11/26/2014 HAMPTON YOGA 828.00 0.00 • 828.00 AP 00353346 11/26/2014 HAY,SHARYN 192.00 0.00 . 192.00 AP 00353347 11/26/2014 HDL COREN AND CONE 4,200.00 0.00 4,200.00 AI' 00353348 1 1/26/2014 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 493.00 . 0.00 493.00 AP 00353349 11/26/2014 IBM CORPORA'T'ION 584.22 0.00 584.22 AP 00353350 11/26/2014 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOARD 1,424.51 0.00 1,424.51 AP 00353351 11/26/2014 INLAND('RESORT& MAILING SERVICES 97,43 0.00 97.43 AP 00353352 11/26/2014 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF ADMIN PROFESSIONALS 0.00 166.00 166.00 AP 00353353 11/26/2014 ISAAC, RAMY 117.00 0.00 117.00 AP 00353354 11/26/2014 JACOBSEN WEST 2,821.70 0.00 2,821.70 AP 00353355 11/26/2014 JENNINGS, KRISTEN 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00353356 11/26/2014 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 312.00 0.00 312.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: I Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait 1 Time: 14:15:18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P31 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353357 11/26/2014 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 1,402.86 0.00 1,402.86 AP 00353358 11/26/2014 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 3,008.00 0.00 3,008.00 AP 00353359 11/26/2014 K K WOODWORKING 86.32 0.00 86.32 AP 00353360 11/26/2014 KARATSU, ROBERT 1.213.70 0.00 1,213.70 AP 00353361 11/26/2014 KATAI• DIN ENVIRONMEN'T'AL 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00353362 11/26/2014 KONE INC 613.67 0.00 613.67 AP 00353363 11/26/2014 KVAC ENVIRONMEN'T'AL SERVICES 0.00 706.83 706.83 AP 00353364 11/26/2014 LAVRUK,ALEX 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00353365 11/26/2014 LEARNING EXPRESS TLC . 4,181.00 0.00 4,181.00 AP 00353366 11/26/2014 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 47.81 47.81 AP 00353367 11/26/2014 LIGHTHOUSE,THE 0.00 8.10 8.10 AP 00353368 11/26/2014 LIGHTWIRE THEATER 13,020.00 • 0.00 13,020.00 AP 00353369 11/26/2014 LINDA RYAN REPORTING 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00353370 11/26/2014 LOPEZ,LUPITA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00353371 11/26/2014 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 62,424.80 0.00 62,424.80 AP 00353372 11/26/2014 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00353373 11/26/2014 MARRUJO,PAUL 5.00 0.00 5.00 AP 00353374 11/26/2014 MARTIN AND CHAPMAN CO 41.48 0.00 41.48 AP 00353375 11/26/2014 MAVENLINK INC 280.00 0.00 280.00 AP 00353376 11/26/2014 MCG ARCHITECTURE 488.00 0.00 488.00 AP 00353377 11/26/2014 MEDINA,DAYRA 8.96 0.00 8.96 Al' 00353378 11/26/2014 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 1.410.00 0.00 1,410.00 AP 00353379 11/26/2014 MICHAEL PICK INTERNATIONAL INC 2,000.00 0,00 2,000.00 AP 00353380 11/26/2014 MIDWEST TAPE 767.29 0.00 767.29 AP 00353381 11/26/2014 MILANETTO. MARSHA 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00353382 11/26/2014 MITSUBISI II ELECTRIC&ELEC'T'RONICS USA INC 626.95 0.00 626.95 AP 00353383 11/26/2014 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 59.28 0.00 59.28 AP 00353384 11/26/2014 MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00353385 11/26/2014 MUMOLO.ANNETI'E 108.64 0.00 108.64 AI' 00353386 11/26/2014 NAIOP 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00353387 11/26/2014 O'LEARY.MAXWELL DOUGLAS 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00353388 11/26/2014 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 125.39 1,234.00 1,359.39*** AP 00353389 11/26/2014 OCLC INC 50.45 0.00 50,45 AP 00353391 11/26/2014 OFFICE DEPOT 4,088.07 5,936.68 10,024.75 *** AP 00353392 11/26/2014 ONTARIO WINNEISON CO 23.46 0.00 23.46 AP 00353393 11/26/2014 ONWARD ENGINEERING 12,835.00 0.00 ' 12,835,00 AI' 00353394 11/26/2014 OOST,NANCY 1 30.00 0.00 30.00 AP 00353395 11/26/2014 ORANGE PUBLIC LIBRARY 25.00 0.00 25.00 AP 00353396 11/26/2014 ORONA, PATRICIA 675.00 0.00 675.00 - AP 00353397 11/26/2014 OTT,LAURA 627.00 0.00 627.00 AP 00353398 1 1/26/2014 OTT.SHARON 414.00 0.00 414.00 AP 00353399 11/26/2014 PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00353400 11/26/2014 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00353401 11/26/2014 PARTIDA,MARICELA 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00353402 11/26/2014 PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE 95.00 0.00 95.00 AP 00353403 11/26/2014 PETERSON NUT COMPANY 3,233.50 0.00 3,233.50 AP 00353404 11/26/2014 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 33,882.50 0.00 33,882.50 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 . Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED -CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:15:18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P32 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353405 11/26/2014 PITNEY BOWES 1,521.77 0.00 1,521.77 AP 00353406 11/26/2014 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 91.05 0.00 91.05 AP 00353407 11/26/2014 PRISTINE UNIFORMS EEC 0.00 • 1,004.90 1,004.90 AP 00353408 11/26/2014 PROJECT SISTER FAMILY SERVICES 6,582.58 0.00 6.582.58 AP 00353409 1126/2014 RAINEY.LATREACE 630.00 0.00 630.00 AP 00353410 11/26/2014 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL INC 131.99 0.00 131.99 AP 00353411 11/26/2014 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 10.80 0.00 10.80 AP 00353412 11/26/2014 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 27,525.83 0.00 27,525.83 AP 00353413 11/26/2014 RICHLEIGH ASSOCIATES INC 2,356.00 0.00 2,356.00 AP 00353414 11/26/2014 RIVERA JR,CARLOS 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00353415 11/26/2014 RIM DESIGN GROUP INC 22,551.10 0.00 22,551.10 AP 00353416 11/26/2014 ROCKAPELLA ROAD CORP 7,440.00 0.00 7,440.00 AP 00353417 11/26/2014 SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 7,386.00 0.00 7,386.00 AP 00353418 11/26/2014 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 714.00 0.00 714.00 AP 00353419 11/26/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 55,143.75 0.00 55,143.75 AP 00353420 11/26/2014 SANCHEZ,CARMEN 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00353421 11/26/2014 SANCHEZ, FLOR 86.11 0.00 86.11 AP 00353422 11/26/2014 SBPEA 764.13 0.00 764.13 AP 00353423 11/26/2014 SC FUELS 25,288.45 10,066.33 35,354.78*** AP 00353424 11/26/2014 SCARANO,ROBERT LOUIS 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00353425 '11/26/2014 SENECHAL,CALVIN 508.20 0.00 508.20 AP 00353426 11/26/2014 SEXTON,SHEILA 6.00 0.00 6.00 AP 00353427 11/26/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 93.38 0.00 93.38 AP 00353428 11/26/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00353429 11/26/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES - 48.17 0.00 48.17 AP 00353430 11/26/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 426.20 0.00 426.20 AP 00353431 11/26/2014 SHORT LOAD CONCRETE 569.16 0.00 569.16 AP 00353432 11/26/2014 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 14,143.18 0.00 14,143.18 AP 00353433_ 11/26/2014 SMALL DOG ELECTRONICS 0.00 7,074.20 7,074.20 AP 00353434 11/26/2014 SO CALIF GAS COMI'ANY 412.77 264.60 677.37*** AP 00353435 11/26/2014 SOLIS, EDNA 224.00 0.00 224.00 AP 00353439 11/26/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - 16,333.11 2,296.97 18,630.08*** AP 00353440 11/26/2014 SOUTLILAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 1,773.00 0.00 1,773.00 AP 00353441 11/26/2014 SPARKLETTS 76.00 0.00 76.00 AP 00353442 11/26/2014 SPINITAR 89,747.68 9,460.42 99,208.10*** AP 00353443 11/26/2014 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 25.59 0.00 25.59 AP 00353444 11/26/2014 STOVER SEED COMPANY 2,008.80 0.00 2,008.80 AP 00353445 11/26/2014 SUN BADGE.00 0.00 497.00 497.00 AP 00353446 11/26/2014 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 10,239.40 . 0.00 10,239.40 AP 00353447 11/26/2014 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR USER GROUP ASSOC INC 195.00 0.00 195.00 AP 00353448 11/26/2014 SWRCB FEES 36,416.00 0.00 36,416.00 AP 00353449 11/26/2014 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00353450 11/26/2014 THEATRE @ BOSTON COURT,THE 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00353451 11/26/2014 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER 403.24 0.00 403.24 AP • 00353452 11/26/2014 TOPOR,MICHAEL 41.50 0.00 41.50 AP 00353453 11/26/2014 TRACEY,VAI, 612.00 0.00 612.00 AP 00353454 11/26/2014 TUFANO,ISABEL 34.50 0.00 34.50 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ . Page: 3 Current Date; 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 14:15:18 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P33 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353455 11/26/2014 UNITED WAY 186.00 0.00 186.00 AP 00353456 11/26/2014 UPLAND AUTO TRIM 203.60 0.00 203.60 AP 00353457 11/26/2014 UPS 73.22 0.00 73.22 AP 00353458 11/26/2014 VAUGHN,BRAD W 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00353459 11/26/2014 VECCHIO,TOM 315.40 0.00 315.40 AP 00353461 11/26/2014 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 3,526.34 1,140.59 4,666.93 *** AP 00353462 11/26/2014 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LI' 28.62 0.00 28.62 AP 00353463 11/26/2014 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,497.12 0.00 10,497.12 AP 00353464 11/26/2014 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 0.00 515.00 515.00 AP 00353465 11/26/2014 WANG.JONATHAN 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00353466 11/26/2014 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3,301.18 0.00 3,301.18 AP 00353467 11/26/2014 WHIITIER FERTILIZER 2,354.40 0.00 2,354.40 AP 00353468 11/26/2014 WLC 0.00 812.49 812.49 AP 00353469 11/26/2014 WOMEN LEADING GOVERNMENT 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00353470 11/26/2014 WONG,DAVID 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00353471 1 1/26/2014 ZEE MEDICAL INC 222.95 0.00 222.95 AP 00353472 11/26/2014 HUNTER.BRODERICK 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00353475 11/26/2014 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95,984.44 2,317.75 98,302.19*** AP 00353476 11/26/2014 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 2,133.06 0.00 2,133.06 AP 00353477 11/26/2014 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 610.00 0.00 610.00 AP 00353478 11/26/2014 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,165.00 0.00 1,165.00 AP 00353479 11/26/2014 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 0.00 169.99 169.99 AP 00353480 1 1/26/2014 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 90.65 456.38 547.03 *** AP 00353481 11/26/2014 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 295.96 295.96 AP 00353482 11/26/2014 LIMS AUTO INC 1,380.55 0.00 1,380.55 AP 00353483 11/26/2014 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 83,840.09 83,840.09 AP 00353484 11/26/2014 NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 7,343.57 0.00 7,343.57 AP 00353485 11/26/2014 SPINITAR 445.00 0.00 445.00 AP 00353486 11/26/2014 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 247.93 0.00 247.93 AP 00353487 11/26/2014 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 0.00 172.39 172.39 AP 00353488 11/26/2014 BELL,MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,504.93 1,504.93 AP 00353489 11/26/2014 .LONCAR,PHILIP 0.00 964.58 964.58 AP 00353490 11/26/2014 TOWNSEND,JAMES 0.00 10,534.51 10,534.51 AP 00353491 11/26/2014 WALKER, KENNEFIT 0.00 208.36 208.36 AP 00353492 12/03/2014 10-8 RETROFIT INC. 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00353493 12/03/2014 8TH ST.COLLISION 1,597.20 0.00 1,597.20 Al' 00353494 12/03/2014 909 MAGAZINE 550.00 0.00 550.00 Al' 00353495 12/03/2014 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. - 52.86 0.00 52.86 AP 00353496 12/03/2014 ACP 738.72 0.00 738.72 AP 00353497 12/03/2014 ACTION AWARDS INC. 1,611.19 0.00 1,611.19 AP 00353498 12/03/2014 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS INC 604.80 0.00 604.80 AP 00353499 12/03/2014 ADVANCED TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS INC 6,245.38 0.00 6,245.38 AP 00353500 12/03/2014 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 7,087.50 0.00 7,087.50 AP 00353501 12/03/2014 AFSS 0.00 . 50.00 50.00 AP 00353502 12/03/2014 AIR EXCHANGE INC 0.00 52,817.34 52,817.34 AP 00353503 12/03/2014 ALL CI'T'IES TOOLS 417.65 0.00 417.65 AP 00353504 12/03/2014 ALL SURFACE ROOFING&WATERPROOFING INC 52,987.20 0.00 52,987.20 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:15:18 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P34 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353505 12/03/2014 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES LLC 29,823.02 0.00 29.823.02 AP 00353506 12/03/2014 ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS 0.00 194.40 194.40 AP 00353507 12/03/2014 ALMETEK INDUSTRIES INC. 4,312.00 0.00 4,312.00 AI' 00353508 12/03/2014 ALPIIAGRAPHICS 45.36 0.00 45.36 AP 00353509 12/03/2014 AL IEC INDUSTRIES INC 725.31 0.00 725.31 AP 00353510 12/03/2014 AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH INC 51.989.14 0.00 51,989.14 AP 00353511 12/03/2014 ARCHI'I'ERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,189.10 0.00 1,189.10 AP 00353512 12/03/2014 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 246.83 0.00 246.83 AP 00353513 12/03/2014 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION/MEMBERSI III' 280.00 0.00 280.00 AP 00353514 12/03/2014 ASPLUND,I3RANDON 66.00 0.00 66.00 AP 00353515 12/03/2014 AT&T MOBILITY 0.00 123.78 123.78 AP 00353516 12/03/2014 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 89.70 0.00 89.70 AP 00353517. 12/03/2014 13A1.1,ROBERT 0.00 28.02 28.02 AP 00353518 12/03/2014 I3ARNES AND NOBLE 259.37 0.00 259.37 Al' 00353519 12/03/2014 BATTERY POWER INC 100.39 0.00 100.39 AP 00353520 12/03/2014 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 0.00 1,121.54 1,121.54 AP 00353521 12/03/2014 BRAILEY, KRISTIN 69.28 0.00 69.28 Al' 00353522 12/03/2014 BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN 303.44 0.00 303.44 AP 00353523 12/03/2014 CABLE INC. 11,339.70 • 0.00 11,339.70 AP 00353524 12/03/2014 CARQUEST AU'T'O PARTS 557.08 21.44 578.52*" AP 00353525 12/03/2014 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS . 190.22 701.84 892.06 *** AP 00353526 12/03/2014 CHEMICAL SAFETY TRAINING 0.00 2.000,00 2,000.00 AP 00353527 12/03/2014 CINTAS CORP.#150 3,460.76 0.00 3,460.76 AP 00353528 12/03/2014 CITY RENTALS 82.50 0.00 82.50 AP 00353529 12/03/2014 CLAREMONT COURIER . 192.00 0.00 192.00 AP 00353530 12/03/2014 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 3.37 0.00 3.37 AP 00353531 12/03/2014 CLEAR COAST CONSTRUCTION 0.00 160.00 160.00 AP 00353532 12/03/2014 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 2,786.40 0.00 2.786.40 AP 00353533 12/03/2014 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 376.90 0.00 376.90 AP 00353534 12/03/2014 COOKE,DARRIN 13.33 0.00 13.33 AP 00353535 12/03/2014 . CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 936.48 0.00 936.48 AI' 00353536 12/03/2014 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 2,471.17 0.00 2,471.17 AP 00353537 12/03/2014 CPRS DISTRICT I I 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00353538 12/03/2014 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 251.42 0.00 251.42 • AP 00353539 12/03/2014 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 413.65 0.00 413.65 AP 00353540 12/03/2014 D.I'. DOOR CO. 582.12 0.00 582.12 • AP 00353541 12/03/2014 DIiMCO INC _ 629.97 0.00 629.97 Al' 00353542 12/03/2014 DOWNEY,JENNIFER 11.02 0.00 11.02 AP 00353543 12/03/2014 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,THE 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00353544 12/03/2014 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 507.98 0.00 507.98 AP 00353545 12/03/2014 EFEN10.SUZETTE 475.00 0.00 475.00 Al' 00353546 12/03/2014 EIGHTH AVENUE EN'T'ERPRISE LLC 1,016.89 0.00 1,016.89 AP 00353547 12/03/2014 EMBROIDME 144.72 0.00 • 144.72 AP 00353548 12/03/2014 ETIWANDA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00353549 12/03/2014 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES • 56.16 0.00 56.16 AP 00353550 12/03/2014 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00353551 12/03/2014 FASTENAL COMPANY 26.47 0.00 26.47 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:15:18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P35 AND • RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register I1/25/2014through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353552 12/03/2014 FCLO MUSIC THEATRE 251.80 0.00 251.80 AP 00353553 12/03/2014 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 62.69 0.00 62.69 AP 00353554 12/03/2014 FREEDOM NEWS GROUP 1,380.00 0.00 1,380.00 Al' 00353555 12/03/2014 FURLOW,CRAIG 95.00 0.00 95.00 Al' 00353556 12/03/2014 GAIL MATERIALS 963.27 0.00 963.27 AP 00353557 12/03/2014 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING 2,714.29 0.00 2714.29 AP 00353558 12/03/2014 GEOGRAPHICS 540.00 0.00 540.00 AP 00353559 12/03/2014 GONZALES,ANIOINETTE 74.48 0.00 74.48 Al' 00353560 12/03/2014 GOODYEAR TIRE& RUBBER COMPANY 803.48 0.00 803.48 AP 00353561 12/03/2014 GRACIANO.TAMMIE 0.00 120.00 . 120.00 AP 00353562 12/03/2014 GRAINGER 464.85 61.76 526.61 *** AP 00353563 12/03/2014 GRANICUS INC 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00353564 .12/03/2014 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 2,067.97 0.00 • 2.067.97 AP 00353565 12/03/2014 GUICE,STEPHANIE 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00353566 12/03/2014 IIATANAKA.MARGARET 39.10 0.00 39.10 AP 00353567 12/03/2014 HAWTHORNE LIFT SYSTEMS 249.92 0.00 249.92 Al' 00353568 12/03/2014 HEDIGER.PATRICK . 137.45 0.00 137.45 AP 00353569 12/03/2014 III WAY SAFETY INC 2.728.60 0.00 2,728.60 AP 00353570 12/03/2014 FIMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 78.078.81 78,078.81 AI' 00353571 12/03/2014 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 547.88 0.00 547.88 AP 00353572 12/03/2014 HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA LLC. 61.094.25 0.00 61,094.25 AP 00353573 12/03/2014 HOOD, KARYE 22.97 0.00 22.97 Al' 00353574 12/03/2014 HOSE MAN INC 342.46 44.82 387.28 '*' AP 00353575 12/03/2014 HOUSE OF RUTH 1,006.56 - 0.00 1,006.56 AP 00353576 12/03/2014 HOYT LUMBER CO..SM 0.00 22.64 22.64 • Al' 00353577 12/03/2014 HOYT,ROBERT 50.00 0.00 50.00 , AP 00353578 12/03/2014 HUMAN IMPACT PARTNERS 14,000.00 0.00 14,000.00 AP 00353579 12/03/2014 IMS INC 529.00 0.00 529.00 AI' 00353580 12/03/2014 IMSA 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00353581 12/03/2014 INLAND PRESORT& MAILING SERVICES 28.74 0.00 28.74 AP 00353582 12/03/2014 IPROMOTEU 0.00 1,816.26 1,816.26 AP 00353583 12/03/2014 JARMACK,ASHLEY 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00353584 12/03/2014 JAS PACIFIC 3.895.87 0.00 3,895.87 AP 00353585 12/03/2014 JOHNSON MACHINERY COMPANY 773.09 0.00 773.09 AP 00353586 12/03/2014 JONES AND MAYER. LAW OFFICES OF 720.00 0.00 720.00 AP 00353587 12/03/2014 KRIEGER,ED 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00353588 12/03/2014 LA POWER CENTER 170.90 0.00 170.90 Al' 00353589 12/03/2014 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 95.87 0.00 95.87 AP 00353590 12/03/2014 L.ARKIN, DAVID W 0.00 57.50 57.50 AP 00353591 12/03/2014 LINNELL.SHERRY 1.000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00353592 12/03/2014 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 6,580.00 0.00 6.580.00 AP 00353593 12/03/2014 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 1,726.68 0.00 1,726.68 AP 00353594 12/03/2014 MAIN STREET SIGNS 2.386.15 0.00 2.386.15 AP 00353595 12/03/2014 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 77,541.51 4,559.98 82,101.49'*' AI' 00353596 12/03/2014 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 380.78 0.00 380.78 AP 00353597 12/03/2014 MEDINA,SANDRA 287.05 0.00 287.05 AP 00353598 12/03/2014 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 859.70 0.00 859.70 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 14:15:18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P36 . AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 . Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353599 12/03/2014 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 1,013.06 0.00 1,013.06 AP 00353600 12/03/2014 MIDWEST TAPE 618.12 0.00 618.12 AP 00353601 12/03/2014 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 47.42 0.00 47.42 AP 00353602 12/03/2014 MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 108.00 0.00 108.00 AP 00353603 12/03/2014 NAPA AUTO PARTS 423.1.3 0.00 423.13 AP 00353604 12/03/2014 NRC COMMERCIAL INC 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00353605 12/03/2014 OAKSTONE WELLNESS 2.30753 0.00 2,307.53 AP 00353606 12/03/2014 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 320.84 0.00 320.84 AP 00353608 12/03/2014 OFFICE DEPOT 3,123.05 227.63 3,350.68*** AP 00353609 12/03/2014 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 15,313.20 0.00 15,313.20 AP 00353610 12/03/2014 PASMA, 75.00 0.00 75.0 • AP 00353611 12/03/2014 PAZMINO. EDGAR 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00353612 12/03/2014 PERMACARD 3,013.97 0.00 3,013.97 AP 00353613 12/03/2014 PERRONE,PETER 400.00 0.00 400.00 . AP 00353614 12/03/2014 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 3.357.84 0.00 3,357.84 AP 00353616 12/03/2014 PROVO ENGINEERING 11,642.00 0.00 11,642.00 Al' 00353617 12/03/2014 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 2,429.59 0.00 2,429.59 AP 00353618 12/03/2014 R C EMPLOYEE ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE 17,000.00 0.00 17,000.00 AP 00353619 12/03/2014 RAMIREZ.JOSE J 996.64 0.00 996.64 AP 00353620 12/03/2014 RANCHO REGIONAL.VETERINARY HOSPITAL INC 452.51 0.00 452.51 AP 00353621 . 12/03/2014 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00353622 12/03/2014 RIPPETOE LAW P C 170.00 0.00 170.00 AP 00353623 12/03/2014 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 1,244.13 • 0.00 1,244.13 AP 00353624 12/03/2014 ROBLES, RAUL P 375.00 0.00 375.00 AP 00353625 12/03/2014 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 1,123.35 0.00 1,123.35 AP 00353626 12/03/2014 RYAN, CAROL 28.00 0.00 28.00 Al' 00353627 12/03/2014 S.CALIF. MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDERATION 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00353628 12/03/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 311.00 0.00 311.00 AP 00353629 12/03/2014 SECURITY BANK OF CALIFORNIA 0.00 9,202.16 9,202.16 AP 00353630 12/03/2014 SERVICE SOLUTIONS GROUP 109.96 0.00 109.96 AP 00353631 12/03/2014 SHORT LOAD CONCRETE 360.72 0.00 360.72 AP 00353632 12/03/2014 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 1,231.09 0.00 1,231.09 AP 00353633 . 12/03/2014 SJM INDUSTRICAL RADIO 8,061.20 0.00 8,061.20 AP 00353634 12/03/2014 SLP COMMUNICATIONS 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00353635 12/03/2014 SLS 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00353636 12/03/2014 SMITH, LUCINDA CHRISTINE 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00353637 12/03/2014 SO CAL SANDBAGS 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00353638 12/03/2014 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5.993.28 243.58 6,236.86*** AP 00353639 12/03/2014 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 3,080.00 0.00 3,080.00 AP 00353645 12/03/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,865.01 1,925.55 14,790,56*** AP 00353646 12/03/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17,321.17 0.00 17,321.17 AP 00353647 12/03/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,296.91 0.00 1,296.91 AP 00353648 12/03/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,287.77 0.00 2,287.77 AP 00353649 12/03/2014 SPOONFACTORY 210,00 0.00 210.00 AP 00353650 12/03/2014 STANLEY R HOFFMAN ASSOCIATES INC 4.100.00 0.00 4,100.00 AP 00353651 12/03/2014 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 2,312.68 0.00 2,312.68 AP 00353652 12/03/2014 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 16.52 0.00 16.52 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 14:15:18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P37 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 1 1/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 • Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00353653 12/03/2014 TOT LOT PROS 9,850.00 0.00 9,850.00 AP 00353654 12/03/2014 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 483.00 0.00 483.00 AP 00353655 12/03/2014 UPS 62.58 0.00 • 62.58 AP 00353656 12/03/2014 UTILIQUEST 8,191.15 0.00 8,191.15 AP 00353657 12/03/2014 VALDEZ,TRINA 134.40 0.00 134.40 AP 00353658 12/03/2014 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 107,654.13 0.00 107,654.13 AP 00353659 12/03/2014 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1,225.95 116.58 1,342.53***• AP 00353660 12/03/2014 VICTORIA GARDENS 1,072.98 0.00 1,072.98 AP 00353661 12/03/2014 VIGILANT SOLUTIONS 196,604.00 0.00 196,604.00 AP 00353662 12/03/2014 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 2,717.90 0.00 2,717.90 AP 00353663 12/03/2014 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 53.26 0.00 53.26 AP 00353664 12/03/2014 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,152.29 0.00 1,152.29 AP 00353665 12/03/2014 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 234.85 0.00 234.85 AP 00353666 12/03/2014 WES'I'COAST MEDIA 900.50 0.00 900.50 AP 00353667 12/03/2014 WESTLAND GROUP INC 17,932.00 0.00 17,932.00 AP 00353668 12/03/2014 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 437.50 0.00 437.50 AP 00353669 12/03/2014 WSS EUROSTAR INC 1.041.00 0.00 1,041.00 AP 00353670 12/03/2014 XEROX CORPORATION 1,987.97 0.00 1,987.97 AP 00353671 12/03/2014 XL STORAGE 895.00 0.00 895.00 AP 00353672 12/03/2014 ZEE MEDICAL INC 2,185.00 0.00 2,185.00 Al' 00353673 12/03/2014 ZLJMAR INDUSTRIES INC 3,270.78 0.00 3,270.78 AP 00353674 12/04/2014 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 5,513.10 0.00 • 5,513.10 AP 00353675 12/04/2014 ABC LOCKSMITHS 2,129.53 0.00 2,129.53 AP 00353676 12/04/2014 AGILINE LLC 5,600.00 0.00 5,600.00 AP 00353677 12/04/2014 CALSENSE 1.976.84 0.00 1,976.84 AP 00353678 12/04/2014 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 0.00 1.255.78 1,255.78 AP 00353679 12/04/2014 COMP U ZONE 1,982.44 0.00 1,982.44 AP 00353681 12/04/2014 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.439.86 755.20 82,195.06*** AP 00353682 12/04/2014 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 24.47 246.82 271.29*** AP 00353683 12/04/2014 EMCOR SERVICE 17,187.00 0.00 17,187.00 AP 00353684 12/04/2014 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 3.388.28 0.00 3.388.28 AP 00353685 12/04/2014 • FORD OF UPLAND INC 154.89 0.00 154.89 AP 00353686 12/04/2014 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 3,985.41 0.00 3,985.41 AP 00353687 12/04/2014 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 159.03 0.00 159.03 AP 00353688 12/04/2014 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 67.76 0.00 67.76 AP 00353689 12/04/2014 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,008.72 0.00 1,008.72 AP 00353690 12/04/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.20 0.00 55.20 AP 00353691 12/04/2014 SUNRISE FORD 121.1 I 0.00 121.11 AP 00353692 12/04/2014 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 17,073.34 0.00 17,073.34 AP 00353693 12/04/2014 VISTA PAINT 810.38 0.00 810.38 EP 00004762 11/26/2014 AECOM 54,489.50 0.00 54,489.50 EP 00004763 11/26/2014 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9,205.00 0.00 9,205.00 EP 00004764 11/26/2014 FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LTC 63,962.47 0.00 63,962.47 EP 00004765 11/26/2014 RCPFA 9,999.66 0.00 9,999.66 EP 00004766 1 1/26/2014 VIASYN INC 5,014.62 0.00 5,014.62 EP 00004767 11/26/2014 RCCEA 1,325.00 0.00 1,325.00 • El' 00004769 11/26/2014 AHUMADA,ALEXANDER R 0.00 846.58 846.58 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 14:15:18 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P38 AND • RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Cheek No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount EP 00004770 11/26/2014 ALMAND. LLOYD 0.00 535.72 535.72 EP 00004771 11/26/2014 BANTAU.VICTORIA 0.00 893.87 893.87 EP 00004772 11/26/2014 BAZAI.,SUSAN 0.00 1.323.48 1,323.48 EP 00004773 11/26/2014 BERRY,DAVID 0.00 964.58 964.58 EP 00004774 11/26/2014 BROCK,ROBIN 0.00 832.95 832.95 EP 00004775 11/26/2014 CAMPBELL„GERALD 0.00 1,289.65 1,289.65 El' 00004776 11/26/2014 CARNES,KENNETH 0.00 717.76 717.76 EP 00004777 11/26/2014 CLABBY,RICHARD 0.00 964.58 964.58 • EP 00004778 11/26/2014 CORCORAN,ROBERT 0.00 505.59 505.59 El' 00004779 11/26/2014 COX.KARL 0.00 535.72 535.72 EP 00004780 11/26/2014 CRANE.RALPH 0.00 1,353.64 1,353.64 EP 00004781 11/26/2014 CROSS LAND_WILBUR 0.00 470.94 470.94 El' 00004782 11/26/2014 DAGUE,JAMES 0.00 1.130.18 1,130.18 El' 00004783 11/26/2014 DE ANTONIO. SUSAN 0.00 505.59 505.59 El' 00004784 11/26/2014 DOMINICK. SAMUEL A. 0.00 832.95 832.95 El' 00004785 11/26/2014 EAGLESON. MICHAEL 0.00 1504.93 1,504.93 El' 00004786 11/26/2014 FRITCHEY.JOHN D. 0.00 470.94 470.94 EP 00004787 11/26/2014 HEYDE.DONALD 0.00 1,130.18 1,130.18 EP 00004788 11/26/2014 INTERLICCHIA.ROSALYN 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 El' 00004789 11/26/2014 LANE,WILLIAM 0.00 1,504.93 1,504.93 El' 00004790 1 1/26/2014 LEE.ALLAN 0.00 1A72.85 1,472.85 El' 00004791 11/26/2014 LENZE,PAUL E 0.00 1,102.77 1,102.77 EP 00004792 11/26/2014 L,ONGO,JOE 0.00 175.97 175.97 EP 00004793 11/26/2014 LUITRULL.DARRELL 0.00 717.76 717.76 EP 00004794 11/26/2014 MACKALL.BENJAMIN 0.00 175.97 175.97 EP 00004795 11/262014 MAYFIELD. RON 0.00 1,353.64 1,353.64 El' 00004796 11/26/2014 MCKEE.JOHN 0.00 535.72 535.72 EP 00004797 11/26/2014 MCMILLEN, LINDA 0.00 615.52 615.52 EP 00004798 1 1/26/2014 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 944.68 944.68 El' 00004799 11/26/2014 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 832.95 832.95 El' 00004800 11/26/2014 MORGAN,BYRON 0.00 2,265.72 2,265.72 El' 00004801 11/26/2014 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 964.58 964.58 FP 00004802 11/26/2014 NAUMAN. MICHAEL 0.00 964.58 964.58 EP 00004803 11/26/2014 NEE,RON 0.00 1,795.43 1,795.43 EP 00004804 11/26/2014 NELSON,MARY JANE 0.00 175.97 175.97 EP 00004805 11/26/2014 PLOLJNG.MICHAEL J 0.00 188.23 188.23 EP 00004806 11/26/2014 POST.MICHAEL R 0.00 1.717.64 1,717.64 EP 00004807 11/26/2014 PROULX.PATRICK 0.00 1,504.93 1.504.93 EP 00004808 11/26/2014 ROEDER.JEFF 0.00 1,504.93 1.504.93 EP 00004809 11/26/2014 SALISBURY.THOMAS 0.00 832.95 832.95 EP 00004810 11/26/2014 SMITH,RONALD 0.00 964.58 964.58 EP 00004811 11/26/2014 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 470.94 470.94 EP 00004812 11/26/2014 SPAIN. WILLIAM 0.00 717.76 717.76 EP 00004813 11/26/2014 SULLIVAN,JAMES 0.00 778.76 778.76 EP 00004814 11/26/2014 TAYLOR.STEVE 0.00 . 1,102.77 1,102.77 EP 00004815 11/262014 TIJLEY,TERRY 0.00 1,130.18 1,130.18 El' 00004816 11/26/2014 VANDERKALLEN. FRANCIS 0.00 1,157.44 1,157.44 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait 1 Time: 14:15:18 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P39 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/25/2014 through 12/9/2014 Check No. Check Date •Vendor Name City Fire Amount EP 00004817 11/26/2014 WOLFE,JACKIE 0.00 617.32 617.32 EP 00004818 11/26/2014 YOWELI.,TIMOTHY A 0.00 1.353.64 1,353.64 El' 00004819 11/26/2014 KILMER,STEPHEN 0.00 1.289.65 1,289.65 EP 00004820 11/26/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,480,220.61 1,289.65 1,289.65 *** Total City: $4,442,574.53 Total Fire: $409,420.13 • Grand Total: $4,851,994.66 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures • • User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 12/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:15:18 • P40 rn E m m ' o > a ° n i m o o a E N M N ° F Q ,n o O U W V 8 e E O o a c CO DC m U a ` a o m CO a o u CC o K n o w 1s E c a o. c i_ v� y y m ' U a o y r = N y O N .o CC I a O O N O W r ..- = T 0 C M > U o ~y N Y r f E to L W t N O CO 01 OI N yq a a O N OE c = c o 9 O L E y ... d > 0 a O a � ` N o a' CO M > W o v' ' GI < E >, U •cien 0 O o y a e N L O= o 0 O O p N. N ^e° N h P y o N E N O a X 0 a E y > m c G 7 el N S m m CO N N A • E U 0 N O 1� n n b m N O Cl) 0 Go 1° 0 N O o N N N V co, .L.. O CO y N O Y O f p N « CO m r umi < to 2n v'i NI ° ° U C }' vi vi co y r co '0 E O ° e vi 10 ° L°. C O co T.- 0 • VG d G N N N o d?re O C1 co N C v = N y— p O lE CO .. � L Q F N N q n >C O a U a O m C O — E . ° °o o .. N M 10 o Y ' N $ a C A p o CO W e V N N O N To• N .L.. 0 or co Z m P co N N y t- in it r= L O O a Q ^ m 0 0 NIi: O E \ a d w ; °z o a L • y y N C y CO e « y Ol 'N dJ CO 0 0 0 en £ A O N V co N N g C`Cr d; ai O O O M W E N to ' E L V a 0 0 0 0 N ' c oc co N E °' - W W > E C �p 00 m CO N W N ' L ,— n 2 O U V p p f. m b V N C N t+1 70- O 11 0 a0 O C a L_ O N N N a E U co T N as y U m m g c >O E 10— o w a O y co > y N v m O = C Z d Ca o c C 7 M Td— Cu N -, To E a U y y 4 A co O m r d h c y c o a U_ o D n d co_ r d c OOE `0 °1 ' m e� LL O N N U E y co y O \ 0 - U _ > j y U 3 C �` r m E a a 3 a c m x a• E 4E,. � E v Id 3 v w a m y n.5 o lc 6 co' , a Z G =cc Ti mc Q '° c L E ai p r co ,- .c y LL W I.� ,•t�. W� D E m A N H ;!22SS> > m ,m�'o o a 1°. !9 `� `> a°i r E m > E� uai S .4 LL = 0 S O o S C N F F U < t �C > H o1 -1 z' P41 a.- 0 0 [O 0 N N 00 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 O+ 0 0 A 0 0 0 N C [O N 0 0 CO 0 0 Y a o• L N 0 0 0 o o O O O o o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 o O O O o 0 0 o O o o F < n M O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m N N N N N A 0 CO co co 0 r r CO r r 0 m N m A CO O O a 0 A N 0 01 O CO N 0..) O. 2 N r N 0 r N O r O N N N CO. CO N O N O r N N N r O f J P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 1r O 0 r y N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d1 t0 'C 0 N O N CO N CO N N r CO CO N r r y N ` y N CO 0 r y 0 r 0 0 N O r _ LL M -J V) y A N A CO N O N 0 CO CO r r 0 p y 0 N O yy 0 0 p N tO CO 0 d CC 0 W r r r CO m O co r r r 0 0 CO_ 0 O) ' r r OI CO M 0 f_ f0 0 0 f 0. d S r 0 0 0 '— in O N 0 '- 0 0 0 r A 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 A 0 O N O 0 N I- 0 0 C) 0 0 0 N N O y 0 0 01 N 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 A O 0 N C+ 0 0) A 0 r O 0 r C) r y O o C) 0 0 0 0 0 V) 0 O. O. 0 7 N A o 0 V) 0 0 0 O O CU N CO CO N CO 0 CO CO CO 0 N CO CO CO N N. N N R CO CO N CO N CU CO N CO N CO T N N 0 10 R 01 N N N CO (0 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N 0 0 0 0 co O < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <• 0 S 0000000000000000000000000000000 '0 rd 0 N 0 CO 0 0 0 CO A 0 0 0 0 A A N N co O O 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 S c N N- 000001- /- (7 O N C) 0) 0 0 0 A 0 0 co O O O N A O 0 0 0 O) 0•y K O '- 0 ' r O O CO O N Y) r 0 O O 0 r 0 N O 0 y 0 N N 0 0 0 O O N 0 p 0 A 1 0 0 0 0 N C) CO N O O CO 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 O CO 0 O y 0 0 Co N 0 0 CO. N 0 0) 0 0 p. p . 0 CO C) N 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 00010 /- 000 /- 0 (000/ 030N01.1101 0 A 0 0) 0 W N- 0000300000 0 -1C CO CO 0) O N 01 O 0 0 0 0 1 0 O 0 N O CO 0 0 0 N N CO_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 A•O 0 0 0 0 A 0 A A y 0 N O 0 A O 0 A 0 0 0 0 O 0) C) O 0 0 0 0 0 0 p N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O) 0 0 0 m 0) O) 0 1 0 0) O OI O1 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0) 01 CO 0 0 01 O 0 OI OI 0 0 N 0 N 0 Cl 0 N O y O 0 0 Of y N O CO O N O 0 CO CO 0 N r y C) y y C) y N y N N N y N N 0 r N r N C) C) N y r C) y 0 N CI N 1 O 0 N N 000000000000000000 , 000000000000 0 0 0 0 C) CI O O 0 0 0 0 O r O O O O N O 0 O O 0 0 10 0 O 0 0 0 0 O o O 0 O 11 ri . Q. . 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 y N NN A m N N Y r N y 0 f0 1 ' CO20:300 0 • OI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O) W N A N 0 C) C) N 0 A CI O 0 y 01 0 0 N N C) N O NP/ r N 0 CO 0 0 0 O) 0 O r O co- N co 0 0 co- O 0 0 co- r A 01 0 O OI N co- N O y O O 0 t m N, 00 0 A A 0 O N N 0 r 0 0 r r r 0 0 0 0 0 A O O r CO 0 0 CO CO 0 0) 1030300010000 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ni 0) y 0 0 0 0 N 0 O O 0 1 CU Y If1 N CO- CO- y p Q 0 N 0 N C) C) y C) N C) .- N r N Cl lh N y N C) y 0 C) Q (V LA C C O E C E C y r a CO V > N 0 (01 M 0000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 tm C To Ci a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V > m m 0000000000000000000000000000000 RI O 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000000000000000 C I M CU 0 0 6666666666'66 O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O y d N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 O N O 0 O 0 0 O O O O N O O co, co_ L C Q a N O C) 0 0 y 0 N 0 N CI 0 y C) N 0 r N ,- N 1 CO N 1 N 0 1 0 C) 0 C) L a c 0 0 E It _ o ix t O G 0 0 Z A m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 CO r 0 0 r co tn O r r O CD r O) A CO 0 0 0 1 A A 0 0 0 0 0 C) N , N0 r N N r 0 0 O N N N N N O N N C) O N U a d ' O O a o o a 0 cocoa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '- 0 o a 0 0 a a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 CO 00 0 Ng, 0 j q N 0 .1C0 N n Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (7 O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y Y I C Y Y Y Y Y Y S C Y S L F z v < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < z 2 Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z C D mm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m < < < <¢ < < < < < < < < < < 0 LL H H H F F H H H H H H H H H H H m m m m m 0 m m m m m m m m 2 co• o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z CC ¢ ¢ IZ CC K K K K ¢ CC ¢ tt ¢ ¢ CC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 -J J J J J J J J J J J J J J } 2222222222222222w W W W W W W W W W 01W W W W o d K m K K K m m m K K K K K K K K 2 2 2 2 M 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 y 2 01 < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • W E LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL S S z = = 2 S S S = ix S S S 01 0 0 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J < WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW0WWWWWWWWWWWW • '0 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 0 0 0000000000000000000000000000000 0 m w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w J 3 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U. U. U. U. LL U. U- 0 G C rt 9 y O c C C E LL o >0 O U y N 0 N 0 0 0) 0 N 0 0 1 0 r 0 0 0 0 O 0 p r y 0 N 0 0 O N N d O 0 N N N y pp O 0 0 0 A A N- 0 CO N N CO C) y y CO A A CO CO C) C C 00 0 y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y O 0 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 N N 0 0 0 CN O 0' N 0 id 7 C >n T C y U C C 0 o O N 0 b y A o CO LO a Y N < o n d T O m X H K K m a d Z m Z d ) U J mb & 1 o Q¢ O O J O m C N m W O S Y Y Z 0 Q o 0 Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 W p J LL < m 0 m LL S < 0 A Y C) d — pO 0 N 0 N C) 0 C) 0 0 N (yy N y = r w w w W w W w w W W W W W W w A A m m m m A m m < < < < < 0 0 co C) 0 CO CO 0 0 0 (n m 0 n 0 0 CO C) CO CO C) CO CO C) 0 0 0 O 0 o 0 0 CO O > 0 0 0 0 0 C) CO 0 0 0 CO 0 0 CO 0) CO CO 0 0 CO 0 0 C) 0 0 CO CO CO CO 0 CO CO 0 J m LL co 0 (O c (O In C) 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 c co co co 0 C'1 1n 0 0 6 0 0 CI CO p P42 N Z'Z' 000 N m m m 0 m m N 0 m 0 n 0 N O O N- C O O N m 0 O q 'C m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H Q (? O) 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN n CO m r m M m m n U) (0 o m m 0 Q 0 O. 2 O N N N N O CO N N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O N 1 0 N 11 N I C O N O I r P to 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000e r O r 0 C. co M ` CO N CO 0 CO 0 0 0 n N r N M M Of Q 0 O 0 r N 0 m Z 0 m N n CO 0 N o 0 Q CO CO r m p O n M N M N m r 0 d O A f f 0 ` ,- f '- 0 O ^ ` N O CO_ ' OI b 0 0 f_ b O_ p f w 6 2 0 0 0 0 (0 0 10 0 ,- a O O n O Q CO r .- N , 0 ' ' r N O n r 0 0 N Q N N 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 (000 Q N 0 0 0 m O ✓ 0 0 N 0 CO CO N CO 0 0 r 0 0 01 Q N Q 0 O Q Q n n 1 M ✓ r N r r N ' N r r r O a. CO m CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO Q 2 • a a a a a a a a a a a o 2 o O O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O In ON m N n 0 0 0 C O O '0 0 O O O to 0 n n 0 N N O O r O N 0 0 0 O N O O 0 a A r CO o n 0 (7 l7 1� CO 0 0 r 0 ' m V. ° Q r o o NW 2 re r N r N r Q 0 r O N m r 0 0 0 O b O 0 Q 0 0 0 r 00 m 000 (0 Q 0 00 r • 3 (000 (0 0 N O m N 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 (00 O n O 0 0 0 CO CO To O O n n O m 0 0 0 O N O N r 0 0 0 0 N O n O 0 r 0 N O M M N O • 0 0 0 O N NON 0 0 N 0 0 0 N Q Q Q m (0 el Y - 0 O 0 W 0 O N O O O N O CO 0 Q N O O N N 0 N Q 0 CL)$ CO- 0 0 0 0 0 O co- 0 O O O 0 O 0 r O r 0 0 co- N N N 4 0 0030000) 00) 0/ 000000)0 0 0 ID 0000N- 00 CO 0 0 CO Q 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O O MOO 0 r N N O 0 Q O N VW Q M N N N N N N M 0 Q 0 CO- Q Q CO M r M N r 0 M M 0 N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O a 0 7 U) 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q N M n 0 f N Q (O 10 m n Q b Q 0 0 0 Q O O O O 0 O N r • co r Q 0 0 n 0 n N CO Q O N N Q n 0 O m N O 0 n el CO 0 0 x CO CO OI M O r CO 0 0 N N CO IG_ 0 0 (ON O CO N r 0 yN Q Q co- M m N 0 0 0 0 0 M r 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 M M 0 l 0 0 0 0 O O O r O O N N N O r r 0 0 0 O n ` r N N r M m Q 0 b 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 O O 0 N O N Q m 0 0 O Y 2 M N N M M M N Q Q Q N N Q Q Q 0) M N CO M 0 m O] C C via O O C C C in a N > 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 7 N (5 ° ° 000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 7 C > oo oo °o OO oo O o Oo Oo °o oo 00 00 oo oo o O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o ell O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 C I CI N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 t6 y a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0000000 CO ° C1 0 (0010000000000000 CO N N O N 0 0 0 0 O t 2 = d ei ei N CJ 0) CI N Q Q Q 0 17 N Q Y (0 r 0) N ,r m 0 0 O O y C O y E w_ t O O m m 0 M M Q Q Q Q Q Q N M CO CO Q Q Q Q M M Q M M co M O O O Z q N O O O O O 0 O O O 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O Z. /� a 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LL Q 0 M 0 0 n n n CO 0 O O co 0 co 00 , , 0 (0 '00 0 NNNI- NNer0001 0 N N M r r O C I N N N N N U ^ d 0 0 CO N CO CO Q 0 0 0 r Q Q 0 0 000000 0 0 N N 0 IO IY O O 0000000000000 O a N q 0 a a a a a a n d 0 n K K K K 0: K K 0! K INO U U m I'0 m=° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u F F U U 0 U U 0 0. O O U' U' O e V) N N 0: 0' N O F F F F F 1- H F F p U U 000000000 cc a w w J J w w m a m Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 U' O -J 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 N N N .W. W 0 ca) ‘-' < <W W 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z a a a a a a J J 0 0 > 0 O O O r r r O Z Z U Z O O O O O O r F U U O O O 0 K-J -J -J -J > > Z Z W w w W W W w W W 0 y I°F w 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 F F F F F 0 Z Z < a ) u: n: 0 0 at 0 O O O O O O O O O a a a a a a ca W W 0 U U W 1 J 0 CO W 3 S S S S 2 2 r 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z m JJQ Q JQ Q QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ JQ Q J¢ JQ JQ JQ JQ m j r n g 0' K m Z J m m W W W W K 111 Ul K W W W W W W W K W 0.1 LULU LL LL Z Z Q O W LL D y K a' ¢9 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C a a'O O Cl. C W Z C W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W m 2 S O O a _ _ m 1W m LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 0 U 2 2 Z o o q 0 0 7 O O O a a a i! C v ) 3 N c a O 3 i e d U 0 M 0 r N 0 00 ,- 0 Q 0 r n N M Q N CO N. 0 r NO 0 0 m 0 N m N N O N 00300C- 00 Q Q O 0 b N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N N 0 in 0 b 0 0 0 (0 0 N N 0 a o C 2 vi c 0 0 . O m z pc 0 0 0 0 0 O N M O N N N 0 0 0 Q0 N O O N o -ION O Q rr Q W W S NN ul LL ) G CO i l CO > 3 q W W 0 a LL D } r N N b N 6 Y 3 N_ N_ I W N uJ a m a Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 O o 0 N N 0 0 0 Q Q 0 Q < 0 0 0 0 0 U' 0 0 N 0 0 CO CO 0 0 0 r n a b 0 (0 0 0 0 0 Q Q Q V Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 C Q Q 0 0 M 0 0 N- 0 q M M M M CJ CJ C'1 C) M 0 CO CO CO CO CO N n M C) o m m 0 0 0 OC 0 U IS M M M co M M M M co M co M 0 M C) rL O N (00 n n U C0') p P43 ~ ¢ " la C n a o E a =• pr, TY N o a 0- , a- 2 • s 9 A 8 E 9 d 1 y 0 re N d 0 7 ge- A I- > A o O m 61 r • 7 4 • d M d Of ca O Y ry 0 C C E E E E E H co N n> 7 En C 0 m U C el ea ei o CO w a j2 771 c _o m E — Et o ° > O Z A0 C C q U a N N y C N0 A > A N Q m ri d O ry A rn '1;1A A > Q C c A it • C A E 0 0 a m V C C • • P 4 4 � ez a U C o 3 o a $ s c• W a d E . S N O tl s d B 0 f 0 d q N 1s K O N O• M A N h N n _ N O N N l0 . O v N - N O ry o N N N d n N A N N N N O W O N O H • N N co eJ a 6 e n q N In N co 2 n C N C is O Eip V d I N = n 7 W y p j co I.V C .� eh 5 d m 0 CO M • N X C O O E E a . O 0 tO Z d C ea• PP Z. a a V a o a a co d d Nm o to in W N . Q m IC O M i m . IX N O LL U U- 0 u 9 Y c c J Z co d • m m PO E N Z d a O CO e • Z y 9 D > c a W .c d W # C U a O E o W Q • N c 0 o0 O m d C th W o . N E. o . in Po co c o a Ul > >- p U N N T � P4S a) U 0. o E o g 0 z 0 a ¢ 0. a o 1O') N O OOi q —co C Nl h O h - C q N T 0 A N Y 1 M to o 6 6 of A N b 0 0) IO CO h N a 1.- N co W 6 • a in N N jN 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O I- r I.-- I,. P. 0 ; O O O O O a iO .n 6 0 t 1 O O O co O 0 0) 01 0 Ea 6 o 0 0 0 o e of a 0I 0 0 0 0 0 0 e to b a— O 0 0 0 0 0 0 L Q p O oi 0 It r 0 CI N- O O O 0 O O O O C N N 0 0 O O O O O O O 6 q O O co O O O O O O O M u y o 0 0 da'o o 0n 0 CM os .0 o m o m E• 0 0 A > VJ • p> T Z U c >% 0 o as CO m t 2 z, o CN Q Q Q O To• O > r O N N CO 0m1- (E • V � C ` N N re INI W Q O F ,_ O w N 0 0 cit. r °y:% N N N CI O N O 0 - N 0 — d H .0 E o a a a o o 0 0 0 Z 0 0 0 z c- o o z cc cc cc 2 2 2 f 0 O LL 0 2 0 0 0 Z U A u 2 2 2 CO 0 E W o Z Z Z o , Z< 0 0 O 0 E a t Q Q 3 co m a" 3 a • co Q o K K R' 41 S Z co U) (0 o 0 0 0 0 111 ILI 1.11 co L O W W W C Z 2 LL LL LL O J o E C a ot C 1 c O. J F z 0 a LL O 0 o O co n Q Q °w E 00 N .OQ- N - 33 0° UV 0 > C co Co CO C T L « >, 0 U C 0 Q 0 y eS y o Z Q o Q U > M co _ I A ° : Q . O cy,d N oo N n o C o .0 e m V) U A 9 > y O 0 5• J N LL T1 to n CO 4r) aL 0 c s' P46 N O a CO 0 0 N CO CJ CO 0 ' .- CO CO 0)IU 0 tO 0 0 u) o o 0 0 0 0 0 r CO r r 0 m O�v, Ch c o 0 0 o c o 0 a 0 ' o 'xi of Lri o - .- o v a O O O O 0 O O co 0 CO N N CO N CO 00 00 r N 0 CO CO t 0 'C m O N N N N 6 6 r 0 '=I R R V O R t7 C l0 C V r Cl 0 r O ; P47 0 0 N- N 0 OD 0 0 r CO N N (O V N O CD h N CO 0 0 C r N 0 O O co 0 co C N r N O O C) CO r IC 1 O 1 n O n 1 N` O " O V h O CO CD (") or: (■ O th C V Ni n N- N N N N N C n C9 N N O W O V CO CO 0 CO V N N 0 0 N O d N N 0) 0) 0 0 0) r r 0) Y N R a■ O 7 CO CO 0 0 0 l0 0 CO r N C) N O CO O U > N- N- ^ ^ CO N N 0) 0 0 O Z CD al al o a° o o e o e o 0 o a° o 0 0 o a° o 0 0 0 =N o 0 0 0 °o °o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Oo o co > o o c c c c o c c c o o c c o o c o c o E Z' C')ID Q ¢ ¢ ¢ Q Q Q ¢ ¢ ¢ Q Q Q ¢ Q Q Q a Q Q c m p d Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 0)cn f Q N O C) C) co co N N N h r r n n N N U O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .c AI N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LL Y o 0. CO CO r I--- N.- N N N N N N NO CO D N N CV' ' ' C C CO C N 0) Q N c U 0 CO ii in E a a a a C C C C a a a C C C a a a C C C a a a a a C C C C C a a a a a a a C C C C C C C W C CO J J J J 7 7 7 7 J J 7 J J J J J J J 7 7 J J 0 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL > Q d N N W W N N N W N N d d O d O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Y Y .6 Y -6 Y Y -6 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y l u o co cc CO CO CO 113 CO CO CO CO COMM COCO CO CO CO 03 CO CO CO O " M 2 2 2 f 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 M 2 2 2 2 2 2 LL O T > T > > T T > T > T > > > > > > > T T > a U co t C7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C O• 3 a 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Q E $ E Z y C j # N M NO N O N 0 ' N O N 0 C) V I0 0 N CD LL O O O 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 O O co O O co co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U E 2 C 0 0 0 0 0 co (O v v v 003030303 v o v v v v v - N 7 0 0 CO 0 N N N N N N CD CO f0 0 CO C) 07 M CO CO CO C) 0 o 0 a 0 Y) Y) Y) N N n N. N. N N CO CO 0 CO C) CO CO C) CO CO CO C7 0 L 1 0 0 CO CO IO CO OO 0 CJ CO CO CJ < V V d 'Cr 0000000 CO O CD CO CO 0 0 CO C) C) CO CO 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C Q O O ? 'Cr CO CO CO CO CO CO O 'C V O. < N N N N N N N a CO .0 .0 K C t c 2 Q L C J J O C LL o LL a 0 E. N 2 0 C J % J % 7 0 U U 0 E m a LL I- LL F LL a a u co E C 0 d 0 C C C C C J Q 0 C O co LL a aai u O u a C O lLL a O LL O ILL O C) m LL 7 LL m CO 7 CD CO CO a 7 o. a Ny m 0 0 c u m c0i Q . E U d a C r u_ cc m (r N LL w j d r NL 0 ° Q r ¢ N Q E u > a 7 1a Q Q Q m m m c LL 2 !O u Z ,`d_ m in n 7 a 0 j LL 'U a a a a a a a d O 0 0 7 C 0 2 '0 o 0 0 0 C c C C C C E C 0 0 'Q 0 0- 0 0 d C ja 0 a O a o o o 0 0 0 a o 0 n 0 o 0 n - "- > C U CD CO m m m m m Q m LL' CO a K Q Q CO C a > 0 C 0 0 0 0 a O 2' ON 0 or co• Q LL 1 L Ni 0 Q N 0 _o N L > > > > 2 d > > > > I- n C 0 Ce N C # 0 08 0 d CI Tk C 0 N 0 0) O 0 d co 0 Q Q C C, c 3 0 N 0 0 _ 0 a E E w N O O 2 o C m a a C E E CO c 0 0 0 0 e 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N O 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z o a a a LL LL LL U- O U U 0 P48 L0 CO N O N- [ll N N N CO O) N N N- r O N CD V Cl O N V o) 0) O) O] )O O O n N O O N lD M N) co r r N CJ 0 co co N N co O r M L0 CO n r Cr) N r N 0 3 rn r rn M co 0) a0 00 0 r O A N N N N a > V > ro e6 K O 2 Z It CD ID di la E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E d 0 o °O o 00 00 00 0 in } c c o 0 o c c o E . '5 .0 < < < < < < < < c CO 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Ol a CO O 0 0 N- 0 0 N- 0 I\ 0 0 0 N- 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L .. N N N N N N N N it to 0 It LO LO ID N N LO 10 to N N N N N N N N a. E N C a) m C al C U 0 N o E a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a LL C C C C C C C C cc C C C C C a N C 0 = J > = = = 0 = = 0. = = = = = C LL 0I 0 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL ll_ LL LL a. LL LL LL E W a s C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j ✓ o ,- m O CO 0 `0 `0 01 `O 10 10 0 0 0 `0 6 0 c en N 2 2 2 2 E E M E E 2 2 2 E 2 E o W a Z O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U 0 C') 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) $ C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z O 3 a 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E s E 2 Z-tr y C 0 at 0 0 0 L0 0 r N 0 0 0 0 0 N- 0 0 0 Q — ✓ 0 p o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - U E $ C O h h N h N N N 0 W 0) 0) 01 0 0 0 CO J CO CO CO CO CO CO CO (7 0 0 0 0 0 O) 0 .0 O 2 a 0 Cl co Cl 0) co co Cl co co O o O o o co 0 Z - 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 o w w m CO m CO OD C C C Q N N N N N N N N O V V V V V O E a. to a W 0 ce C .0 L 0 C C C r ▪ O ry ELL C LL 0 V V_ m -O a) c J 0 -C 0 0 0 $ p C C U C p LL U o = = a p LL a NLL O N O U ` N a LL a IL L6 Z. T C 0 LL C g LL C U N V Q co "O 0 J O 0 O F G a y a y y C LL F LL - 0 (0 E u m Z .H 6 `o in o. o Ni Z o f i. E • a 'U 0 5 c 0 U `0 a 0 U m ar d a (0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 Co C y c co O. 0 a 0 0 a 0 U 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nn CC a a 0 - d 5 U 00 0 u) 0 0 LL y p C 0 C a a m y Aa° LL W• c t y C N U I- m 3 $ • 0. w y .a c J O at u N LL s 2 `0 I- E Co 0 m N 0 o $ E 0 E W y C 2 0 a O to C o W c o CO CO Z E E E to- N 0 z C 9 CD a CO 0 2 CD 0 0 U 0 0 VI N C 0 F o 0 z J a a; O < r o LL o 0 Z 0 N F P49 STAFF REPORT L PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: December 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Ernest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains, and Fleet Superintendent Kenneth Fung, Assistant Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTNG MAINTENANCE" CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS", TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1177303-5300 (MEASURE I) AND VARIOUS SPECIAL DISTRICT ACCOUNTS AS APPROVED IN THE FY 2014/2015 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the specifications for the "Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Maintenance" Contract and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Maintenance contract is an annual contract for the monthly routine and extraordinary maintenance, repair and other related tasks of City of Rancho Cucamonga owned traffic signals and safety lighting to a traffic signal maintenance company. The contract may be renewed annually by mutual consent for a maximum of 3 years. Legal advertising is scheduled for December 23, 2014 and December 30, 2014, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 20, 2015, unless extended by addenda. A mandatory pre-bid job walk is scheduled at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, January 6, 2015. Staff anticipates awarding a contract on February 18, 2015. Respectfully submit ed, L William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director WW:kf Attachment: Resolution P50 RESOLUTION NO. 14-218 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on January 20, 2015, sealed bids or proposals for the "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT" in said City: A mandatory pre-bid meeting is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, January 8, 2015, at 8794 Lion Street, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Refer to Item "0. Pre-Bid Meeting" of the "Instructions to Bidders" of the bid documents for approximate directions. Attendees are required to sign in at the pre-bid meeting. Bids from companies that did not have a representative sign in at the pre-bid meeting will be rejected. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Resolution No. - Page 1 of 4 P51 Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. They can also be found at www.dir.ca.gov/ under the "Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project (submitted on or after March 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 (with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)). No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project (awarded on or after April 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. For all new projects awarded on or after April 1, 2015, the contractors and subcontractors must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. The requirement to furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner will apply to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing, beginning January 1, 2016. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. Resolution No. - Page 2 of 4 P52 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor or Subcontractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each worker employed in the execution of the contract by the respective contractor or subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of this article. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to, a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class "C- 10" License (Electrical Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. Resolution No. - Page 3 of 4 P53 The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. In an effort to go green and paperless, digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal, including any future addenda or revisions to the bid documents, are available by going to www.ciplist.com and signing up, by going to Member Login or Member Signup (it's free), then choose California, then scroll down to San Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities, then scroll down to Rancho Cucamonga and click on City Projects, then click on the Project of interest under the Title and follow directions for download. Note, copies of the plans, specifications, bid proposal, addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from the above website then printed. Prospective bidders must register for an account on www.ciplist.com to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s) and to receive email updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained on this site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to the bid documents, it is the responsibility of each prospective bidder to register with www.ciplist.com and to check this website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to registered prospective bidders from www.ciplist.com. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT" may be directed to: Ernest Ruiz and Kenneth Fung Streets, Storm Drains, and Fleet Superintendent Assistant Engineer 8794 Lion Street 8794 Lion Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2730, ext. 4108 (909) 477-2730 ext. 4139 (e-mail at eruiz(c�cityofrc.us) (e-mail at kenneth.funq(a)cityofrc.us) All questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids must be in writing (e-mail is acceptable) and received by the City no later than 5:00 pm on Thursday, January 8, 2015. The City is not responsible for questions undeliverable. ADVERTISE ON: PUBLISH DATES: December 23, 2014 and December 30, 2014 Resolution No. - Page 4 of 4 (;.;(9- P54 STAFF REPORT s 'f' ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Lh � Date: December 17, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 16227-2, LOCATED NORTH OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY RYLAND HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 16227-2, located north of Day Creek Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Ryland Homes BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Ryland Homes 49 Discovery, Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92618 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #SU350806 $96,840.00 RReespecffully s-u nitted, .7 �v L Mark-A.-Ste Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/rlf Attachment _ } © 1:1 - _ a" P55 '� IB :. 1 ,2 S 0 ` sa 1 b c x !I ` 1 �+ __ 'G F-i d ��� w liI of 5 F;.� �� = = X31 Y o �. 0 H p4 0 E- Efrz hi I 0 .^. \ 5. i ® 1 irk ..e.' -----_,[4. 7.' m tar.lrim ". .40i '11311141 la \ 0-‹ , . any ap : C," ..,, - ...f.:A. 1 2 5 Aerat Iiii- tatr ilit 1-‘4 ' rk \� i i 1do ®� r sy� 6APV /. y A4 sliii tar b YdY. aJ + �° ®`a L' > 4 /per, W cr. gm t--, . i gpial 611,2*:;;, Asiero \%. ..>":„.,-„; it Q. !ism ma-EN .1aNt_ -1>bz, --,.. .,,,z =5\ lanit1/4 --2‘ \ a En gismjell ea s fLti!$$ffr1 - t .. 44-eir re Kt, ,,S ® �� /,,�, °sue d aismstigits. c,702: _yett., ill ' ill as gig �a Mall alai litligallin s ° WA 4 11111111 R� I Il . , U00111503 N0510-! V7N230jflVJ uu-fra 105 \ • r Q M1 U C7 • OF�1 0 4 -------c- ..:". 73NNY}IJ x33N7 AYJ ':+ F� w rn� ooLad 0-9YTB'S ,�`r .� 0 z tt 0006-E1 -SILO NdV (2) z P56 STAFF REPORT kitt ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT LJ RANCHO Date: December 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE HAVEN AVENUE ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION PROJECT, TO BE FUNDED FROM UTILITY FUND, ACCOUNT NO. 1705303-5650/1883705-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the construction of the Haven Avenue Electric Distribution Line Extension Project, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from Utility Fund, Account No. 1705303-5650/1883705-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Haven Avenue Electric Distribution Line Extension Project will extend the current Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's distribution circuit on Haven Avenue from Jersey Boulevard to Sixth Street. The scope of work for this project consists of, but is not limited to: construction and installation of conduit, substructures, and related work for 12kV underground substructure systems, service conversions, 12kV underground cables, switches, splices, surge arresters, transformers, poles and risers, terminators, grounding, secondary and service cables to connect and complete commercial/industrial service conversions, and trenching, asphalt cut, repair and restoration that meet all Electrical Standard and Specifications for Underground Distribution/Transmission System Construction. As an option, the proposed bid shall also include costs for secondary conduit and service cables to connect and complete onsite commercial service to connect from the utility's distribution line extension. The project will be funded from Utility Fund, Account No. 1705303-5650/1883705-0. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15303(d) of the CEQA guidelines. The engineer's estimate is $837,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for January 8, 2015, and January 13, 2015, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 3, 2015, unless extended by an addendum. Respectfully submitted, Mark.ArS euer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Attachment P57 RESOLUTION NO. 14-219 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HAVEN AVENUE ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "HAVEN AVENUE ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION PROJECT". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 3, 2015, sealed bids or proposals for the "HAVEN AVENUE ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION PROJECT" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the HAVEN AVENUE DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION PROJECT". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. They can also be found at www.dir.ca.gov/ under the "Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency Resolution No. 14-219 - Page 1 of 4 P58 also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. No contractor or subcontractor may be .listed on a bid proposal for a public works project (submitted on or after March 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 (with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)). No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project (awarded on or after April 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. For all new projects awarded on or after April 1, 2015, the contractors and subcontractors must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. The requirement to furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner will apply to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing, beginning January 1, 2016. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any Resolution No. 14-219 - Page 2 of 4 P59 apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor or Subcontractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each worker employed in the execution of the contract by the respective contractor or subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of this article. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with.Labor Code Section 1773.1. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to, a Class "A' License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class "C-10" License (Electrical Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) Resolution No. 14-219 - Page 3 of 4 P60 and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. In an effort to go green and paperless, digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal, including any future addenda or revisions to the bid documents, are available by going to www.ciplist.com and signing up, by going to Member Login or Member Signup (it's free), then choose California, then scroll down to San Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities, then scroll down to Rancho Cucamonga and click on City Projects, then click on the Project of interest under the Title and follow directions for download. Note, copies of the plans, specifications, bid proposal, addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from the above website then printed. Prospective bidders must register for an account on www.ciplist.com to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s) and to receive email updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained on this site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to the bid documents, it is the responsibility of each prospective bidder to register with www.ciplist.com and to check this website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to registered prospective bidders from www.ciplist.com. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "HAVEN AVENUE ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION PROJECT" may be directed to: FRED LYN, UTILITIES DIVISION MANAGER 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2740, ext. 4035 ADVERTISE ON: January 8, 2015 and January 13, 2015 Resolution No. 14-219 - Page 4 of 4 P61 STAFF REPORT kir L s- RANCHO DATE: December 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager FROM: Robert Karatsu, Library Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT FOR CONTRACT NO. 14-115, AND AUTHORIZATION OF AN APPROPRIATION, FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES WITH PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE BIANE LIBRARY IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $128,600 TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 1329601-5650/1867329-0. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve an Amendment for Contract No. 14-115, and the necessary budget appropriations for architectural services with Pitassi Architects, Inc., for the construction drawings for the second floor of the Biane Library in the amount not to exceed $128,600 to be funded from Fund 1329601-5650/1867329-0. • BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS One of the goals identified by the City Council for accomplishment in FY 2014-15 was the further development of the second floor of the Biane Library @ Victoria Gardens. Currently the second floor is a shell space with no tenant improvements. Pitassi Architects, Inc., is the Architect of record for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center, of which the Library is a part of. The scope of work for this agreement includes the construction drawings, which upon completion will have this project ready to be put out to bid for construction. Funding of the project was approved as part of the Capital Improvement Plan for the FY 2013-2014 budget. Respectfully submitted, Robert Karatsu Library Director P62 STAFF REPORT ' h� I ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP LJ RANCHO Date: December 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15, INCLUDING THE ADDITION AND AMENDING OF CERTAIN CLASSIFICATIONS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt the attached resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2014-15 salary schedules for job classifications employed by the City, including the addition and amending of certain classifications. BACKGROUND • The City Council traditionally adopts salary resolutions biannually for those classifications employed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These resolutions are updated to reflect changes in salaries, additions and deletions of classifications, changes in job titles, and other terms of employment. Salaries, classifications,job titles, and other terms of employment remain the same except as follows: • The addition of a new Community Improvement Manager position with a salary range equal to the existing Building Safety Manager and Plan Check and Inspection Manager positions. • Changing classifications with the title "Code Enforcement" to the title of "Community Improvement." For example, the "Senior Code Enforcement Officer" classification would • become "Senior Community Improvement Officer." The essential functions and minimum requirements for the positions remain the same. • The addition of an entry level Community Improvement Officer I classification with a salary range set 20% below the existing Code Enforcement Officer position. This is a trainee level position that allows the City the opportunity to train and mentor candidates who have good skills and abilities and need some time to gain knowledge in the field. o The current Code Enforcement Officer classification would be retitled to Community Improvement Officer II; the salary range, essential functions, and minimum requirements would remain the same. o Employees hired as an entry level Community Improvement Officer I would become a Community Improvement Officer II upon successful completion of one year of service, satisfactory completion of their initial probationary period, and successful acquisition of a PC832 certification. • P63 APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR PAGE 2 2014-15,INCLUDING THE ADDITION AND AMENDING OF CERTAIN CLASSIFICATIONS DECEMBER 17,2014 • Change the title of Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager position to City Clerk Services Director, and make a 10% adjustment to the City Clerk Service Director merit based salary range so that it is comparable to the average salary of similar positions in comparable agencies. o The City recently conducted a recruitment for the position of Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager. While hundreds of applicants applied, less than a handful. seemed to meet the minimum qualifications, only a couple were interviewed, and none were passed on to second interviews. Therefore the City will be reopening the recruitment. Reviewing the recruitment process, and discussions with existing professionals in the field, has resulted in several recommendations designed to improve the opportunity for success in the next round of recruitments. The City has reassessed the title of the position, its current salary range, and our recruitment plan in order to attract qualified applicants, which is why staff is recommending the change above • The addition of a Human Resources Clerk classification at the same salary range as the previous Personnel Clerk Classification. It is important to note that the total number of full-time employees approved in the 2014-15 City Budget are not affected by these proposed changes. The resolution also adopts the following: • The January 1, 2015, salary schedules for Executive employees, Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association covered employees in the Mid-Management, Supervisory/Professional and General Employees bargaining units, San Bernardino Public Employees Association covered employees, and part-time employees. Attachment 1. Resolution 14-220 2. Salary Schedule for Executive Management Employee Job Classifications 3. Salary Schedule for Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Covered Job Classifications made up of positions in the Mid-Manager, Supervisory/Professional and General Employees Groups 4. Salary Schedule for San Bernardino Public Employees Association Job Classifications 5. Salary Schedule for Part-Time City Job Classifications P64 RESOLUTION NO. 14-220 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15, INCLUDING THE ADDITION AND AMENDING OF CERTAIN CLASSIFICATIONS AND CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted salary resolutions establishing salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment including an outline of State and Federally required benefits afforded to part-time employees; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the salary schedules (Attachments 1-4); and permit the City Council to participate in the Executive Management Executive Wellness Plan, provide a monthly mileage allowance in the amount of two hundred dollars, and allow elected officials in office prior to October 6, 2012, to participate in the California Public Employees Retirement System and the PARS Supplemental Retirement Plan. P65 Resolution#14-220 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges effective January 1, 2015 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Animal Services Director 1562 $7,310 1602 $8,924 1632 $10,364 City Clerk Services Director 1534 $6,358 1574 $7,761 1604 $9,014 Assistant City Manager 1637 $10,626 1677 $12,972 1707 $15,066 Building and Safety Services Director 1577 $7,878 1617 $9,617 1647 $11,169 City Manager 1734 $17,238 1774 $21,044 1804 $24,440 Community Services Director 1595 $8,618 1635 $10,521 . 1665 $12,219 Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services 1615 $9,522 1655 $11,624 1685 $13,500 Deputy City Manager/ Econ. & Comm. Dev. 1615 $9,522 1655 $11,624 1685 $13,500 Eng Svs Director/City Engineer 1596 $8,661 1636 $10,573 1666 $12,280 Finance Director 1597 $8,704 1637 $10,626 1667 i $12,341 Human Resources Director 1589 $8,364 1629 $10,210 , 1659 $11,858 Library Director 1579 y $7,957 1619 $9,714 1649 $11,281 Planning Director 1589 $8,364 1629 $10,210 ' 1659 $11,858 Public Works Services Director 1577 $7,878 1617 $9,617 `1647 $11,169 Fire Chief* A $11,950 _ G $16,015 * Included for informational purposes only-This is a Fire District Management Employee Group position not a City position Executive Management December 17, 2014 P66 Resolution No. 14-220 RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges effective January 1, 2015 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Account Clerk 4375 $2,850 4415 $3,480 4425 $3,658 Account Technician 4423 $3,621 4463 $4,421 4473 $4,647 Accountant# 3465 $4,462 3505 $5,448 3515 $5,726 Accounting Manager* 2525 $6,019 2565 $7,348 2575 $7,724 Administrative Secretary' 4424 $3,640 4464 $4,443 4474 $4,670 Administrative Technician 4437 $3,883 4477 $4,741 4487 $4,983 Animal Care Attendant 4349 $2,504 4389 $3,057 4399 $3,213 Animal Caretaker 4378 $2,893 4418 $3,532 4428 $3,713 Animal Care Supervisor# 3416 $3,495 3456 $4,267 3466 $4,485 Animal Center Manager* 2506 $5,475 2546 $6,684 2556 $7,026 Animal Handler 4388 $3,041 4428 $3,713 4438 $3,903 Animal License Canvasser 4349 $2,504 4389 $3,057 4399 $3,213 Animal Services Dispatcher 4369 $2,766 4409 $3,377 4419 $3,550 Animal Services Officer 4441 $3,962 4481 $4,836 4491 $5,084 Assistant City Clerk# 3480 $4,809 3520 $5,871 3530 $6,171 Assistant City Engineer* 2590 $8,324 2630 $10,162 2640 $10,682 Assistant Engineer# 3488 $5,005 3528 $6,110 3538 $6,422 Assistant Library Director* 2572 $7,610 2612 $9,290 2622 $9.765 Assistant Planner# 3468 $4,530 3508 $5,530 3518 $5,813 Assistant to the City Manager* 2548 $6,751 2588 $8,242 2598 $8,663 Associate Engineer# 3518 $5,813 3558 $7,096 3568 $7,459 Associate Planner# 3487 $4,980 3527 $6,079 3537 $6,390 Box Office Coordinator 4450 $4,143 4490 $5,058 4500 $5,317 Budget Analyst# 3498 $5,261 3538 $6,422 3548 $6,751 Building Inspection Supervisor#2 3504 $5,421 3544 $6,617 3554 $6,956 Building Inspector2 4464 $4,443 4504 $5,424 4514 $5,702 Building Safety Manager* 2533 $6,264 2573 $7,648 2583 $8,039 Business License Clerk 4378 $2,893 4418 $3,532 4428 $3,713 Business License Inspector 4418 $3,532 4458 $4,312 4468 $4,533 Business License Program Coordinator# 3432 $3,785 3472 $4,621 3482 $4,857 Business License Technician 4408 $3,360 4448 $4,102 4458 $4,312 Buyer I 4411 $3,411 4451 $4,164 4461 $4.377 Buyer II # 3433 $3,804 3473 $4,644 3483 $4,882 Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Employees Groups December 17, 2014 P67 Resolution No. 14-220 RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges effective January 1, 2015 Minimum Control Point Maximum Community Improvement Officer I 4421 $3,586 4461 $4,377 4471 $4,601 Community Improvment Officer II 4441 $3,962 4481 $4,836 4491 $5,084 Community Improvment Supervisor#2 3481 $4,833 3521 $5,900 3531 $6,202 Community Improvement Manager* 2533 $6,264 2573 $7,648 2583 $8,039 Communications Manager* 2565 $7,348 2605 $8,971 2615 $9,429 Community Programs Coordinator 4450 $4,143 4490 $5,058 4500 $5,317 Community Programs Specialist 4437 $3,883 4477 $4,741 4487 $4,983 Community Services Coordinator 4450 $4,143 4490 $5,058 4500 $5,317 Community Services Marketing Coord 4450 $4,143 4490 $5,058 4500 $5,317 Community Services Project Coordinator# 3500 $5,313 3540 $6,487 3550 $6,818 Community Services Specialist 4350 $2,516 4390 $3,072 4400 $3,229 Community Services Superintendent* 2536 $6,359 2576 $7,763 2586 $8,160 Community Services Supervisor# 3480 $4,809 3520 $5,871 3530 $6,171 Community Services Technician 4437 $3,883 4477 $4,741 4487 $4,983 Community Services Manager* 2506 $5,475 2546 $6,684 2556 $7,026 Community Svc Marketing Manager* 2536 $6,359 2576 $7,763 2586 $8,160 Cultural Arts Manager* 2506 $5,475 2546 $6,684 2556 $7,026 Deputy City Clerk# 3430 $3,748 3470 $4,575 3480 $4,809 Engineering Aide 4421 $3,585 4461 $4,377 4471 $4,601 Engineering Technician 4441 $3,962 4481 $4,836 4491 $5,084 Environmental Programs Coordinator# 3503 $5,394 3543 $6,584 3553 $6,921 Environmental Programs Inspector-2 4464 $4,443 4504 $5,424 4514 $5,702 Environmental Programs Manager* 2539 $6,455 2579 $7,880 2589 $8,283 Executive Assistant* 2460 $4,353 2500 $5,314 2510 $5,585 Facilities Superintendent* 2536 $6,359 2576 $7,763 2586 $8,160 Fleet Supervisor#2 3488 $5,005 3528 $6,110 3538 $6,422 GIS Analyst 4456 $4,269 4496 $5,212 4506 $5,479 GIS Technician 4436 $3,864 4476 $4,717 4486 $4,958 GIS/Special District Manager* 2538 $6,423 2578 $7,841 2588 $8,242 Human Resources Clerk 4389 $3,057 4429 $3,732 4439 $3,922 Human Resources Manager* 2583 $8,039 2623 $9,814 2633 $10,315 Human Resources Technician 4399 $3,213 4439 $3,922 4449 $4,123 Information Services Analyst l# 3505 $5,448 3545 $6,650 3555 $6,991 Information Services Analyst II# 3520 $5,871 3560 $7,167 3570 $7,534 Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Employees Groups December 17, 2014 P68 Resolution No. 14-220 RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges effective January 1, 2015 Minimum Control Point Maximum Information Services Manager* 2584 $8,079 2624 $9,863 2634 $10,367 Information Services Projects Coord.# 3508 $5,530 3548 $6,751 3558 $7,096 Information Services Specialist I 4456 $4,269 4496 $5,212 4506 $5,479 Information Services Specialist II 4471 $4,601 4511 $5,617 4521 $5,904 Librarian l# 3435 $3,842 3475 $4,691 3485 $4,930 Librarian II# 3457 $4,288 3497 $5,235 3507 $5,502 Library Assistant l# 3373 $2,820 3413 $3,443 3423 $3,619 Library Assistant I I# 3414 $3,460 3454 $4,224 3464 $4,440 Library Clerk 4356 $2,593 4396 $3,165 4406 $3,327 Library Page 4244 $1,483 4284 $1,810 4294 $1,903 Library Page II 4293 $1,894 4333 $2,312 4343 $2,430 Library Services Manager* 2506 $5,475 2546 $6,684 2556 $7,026 Library Technician 4393 $3,116 4433 $3,804 4443 $3,999 Maintenance Supervisor#2 3488 $5,005 3528 $6,110 3538 $6,422 Management Aide 4440 $3,942 4480 $4,812 4490 $5,058 Management Analyst l# 3470 $4,575 3510 $5,585 3520 $5,871 Management Analyst II# 3498 $5,261 3538 $6,422 3548 $6,751 Management Analyst III# 3515 $5,726 3555 $6,991 3565 $7,348 Office Services Clerk 4369 $2,766 4409 $3,377 4419 $3,550 Office Specialist I 4349 $2,504 4389 $3,057 4399 $3,213 Office Specialist II 4369 $2,766 4409 $3,377 4419 $3,550 Park/Landscape Maintenance Supt*2 2536 $6,359 2576 $7,763 2586 $8,160 Payroll Supervisor# 3470 $4,575 3510 $5,585 3520 $5,871 Plan Check & Inspection Manager* 2533 $6,264 2573 $7,648 2583 $8,039 Planning Commission Secretary# 3444 $4,019 3484 $4,906 3494 $5,157 Planning Manager* 2583 $8,039 2623 $9,814 2633 $10,315 Planning Specialist 4443 $4,001 4483 $4,885 4493 $5,135 Planning Technician 4423 $3,621 4463 $4,421 4473 $4,647 Plans Examiner# 3482 $4,857 3522 $5,930 3532 $6,233 Principal Librarian* 2495 $5,183 2535 $6,327 2545 $6,651 Principal Management Analyst* 2543 $6,585 2583 $8,039 2593 $8,450 Principal Engineer* 2567 $7,422 2607 $9,061 2617 $9,524 Principal Planner* 2537 $6,391 2577 $7,802 2587 $8,201 Public Services Technician I 4413 $3,445 4453 $4,206 4463 $4,421 Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Employees Groups December 17, 2014 P69 Resolution No. 14-220 RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges effective January 1, 2015 Minimum Control Point Maximum Public Services Technician II 4423 $3,621 4463 $4,421 4473 $4,647 Public Services Technician III 4443 $4,001 4483 $4,885 4493 $5,135 Public Works Inspector 12 4444 $4,021 4484 $4,909 4494 $5,160 Public Works Inspector 112 4464 $4,443 4504 $5,424 4514 $5,702 Public Works Maintenance Manager* 2566 $7,385 2606 $9,016 2616 $9,477 Public Works Safety Coordinator#2 3468 $4,530 3508 $5,530 3518 $5,813 Purchasing Clerk 4374 $2,836 4414 $3,462 4424 $3,640 Purchasing Manager* 2530 $6,171 2570 $7,534 2580 $7,919 Records Clerk 4358 $2,619 4398 $3,197 4408 $3,360 Records Coordinator 4386 $3,011 4426 $3,676 4436 $3,864 Risk Management Coordinator# 3470 $4,575 3510 $5,585 3520 $5.871 Secretary' 4394 $3,134 4434 $3,826 4444 $4,021 Senior Account Clerk 4395 $3,149 4435 $3,845 4445 $4,041 Senior Account Technician 4446 $4,062 4486 $4,958 4496 $5,212 Senior Accountant# 3498 $5,261 3538 $6,422 3548 $6,751 Senior Administrative Secretary' 4444 $4,021 4484 $4,909 4494 $5,160 Senior Animal Services Officer# 3461 $4,374 3501 $5,340 3511 $5,613 Senior Building Inspector#2 3484 $4,906 3524 $5,989 3534 $6,295 Senior Buyer# 3463 $4,418 3503 $5,394 3513 $5,669 Senior Civil Engineer* 2547 $6,717 2587 $8,201 2597 $8,620 Senior Community Improvment Officer# 3461 $4,374 3501 $5,340 3511 $5,613 Senior Electrician # 3485 $4,930 3525 $6,019 3535 $6,327 Senior GIS Analyst# 3484 $4,906 3524 $5,989 3534 $6,295 Senior Information Services Analyst# 3535 $6,327 3575 $7,724 3585 $8,119 Senior Information Services Specialist 4493 $5,135 4533 $6,268 4543 $6,589 Senior Librarian# 3468 $4,530 3508 $5,530 3518 $5,813 Senior Park Planner# 3500 $5,313 3540 $6,487 3550 $6,818 Senior Planner* 2517 $5,784 2557 $7,061 2567 $7,422 Senior Plans Examiner# 3497 $5,235 3537 $6,390 3547 $6,717 Senior Special Districts Technician 4443 $4,001 4483 $4,885 4493 $5,135 Special Districts Analyst# 3498 $5,261 3538 $6,422 3548 $6,751 Special Districts Technician 4437 $3,883 4477 $4,741 4487 $4,983 Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Supt*2 2536 $6,359 2576 $7,763 2586 $8,160 Supervising Public Works Inspector#2 3494 $5,157 3534 $6,295 3544 $6,617 Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Employees Groups December 17, 2014 P70 Resolution No. 14-220 RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges effective January 1, 2015 Minimum Control Point Maximum Theater Production Coordinator 4460 $4,355 4500 $5,317 4510 $5,589 Theater Production Supervisor# 3480 $4,809 3520 $5,871 3530 $6,171 Theatre Technician III 4423 $3,621 4463 $4,421 4473 $4,647 Traffic Engineer* 2569 $7,496 2609 $9,152 2619 $9,620 Utilities Division Manager* 2584 $8,079 2624 $9,863 2634 $10,367 Utility Operations Manager* 2524 $5,989 2564 $7,312 2574 $7,686 Veterinarian* 2579 $7,880 2619 $9,620 2629 $10,112 Veterinary Assistant 4407 $3,344 4447 $4,082 4457 $4,291 Veterinary Technician 4437 $3.883 4477 $4,741 4487 $4,983 1 When acting as Clerk to Commissions$50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory time off can be substituted in lieu of$50 at the option of the employee. 2' Refer to MOU for provision of boot allowance. #Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class * Denotes Management Class Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Employees Groups December 17, 2014 P71 Resolution No. 14-220 PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES Represented By SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (SBPEA) ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 1, 2015 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Electrician 5457 $4,287 5497 $5,234 5507 $5,502 Equipment Operator 5425 $3,655 5465 $4,462 5475 $4,690 Inventory Specialist Equipment/Mat 5389 $3,054 5429 $3,729 5439 $3,919 Lead Maintenance Worker 5429 $3,729 5469 $4,552 5479 $4,785 Lead Mechanic 5440 $3,939 5480 $4,808 5490 $5,054 Maintenance Coordinator 5452 $4,182 5492 $5,105 5502 $5,366 Maintenance Worker 5391 $3,085 5431 $3,766 5441 $3,958 Mechanic 5430 $3,747 5470 $4,574 5480 $4,808 Senior Maintenance Worker 5401 $3,243 5441 $3,958 5451 $4,161 Signal & Lighting Coordinator 5479 $4,785 5519 $5,841 5529 $6,140 Signal & Lighting Technician 5452 $4,182 5492 $5,105 5502 $5,366 Public Works Maintenance Employees December 17, 2014 P72 Resolution No. 14-220 PART-TIME CITY POSITIONS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Hourly Pay Ranges Effective January 1, 2015 Minimum Control Point Maximum Part Time Positions Steo Amount _Step Amount . Step . Amount Account Clerk 6368 $15.87 6408 $19.37 6418 $20.36 Account Technician 6423 $20.88 6463 $25.49 6473 $26.79 Accountant 6465 $25.75 6505 $31.43 6515 $33.04 Administrative Intern 6320 $12.48 6360 $15.24 6370 $16.03 Animal Care Attendant 6349 $14.43 6389 $17.62 6399 $18.52 Animal Caretaker 6378 $16.69 6418 $20.38 6428 $21.42 , Animal Handler 6388 $17.54 6428 $21.41 6438 $22.50 Animal License Canvasser 6266 $9.54 6306 $11.65 6316 $12.26 Animal Services Dispatcher 6369 $15.95 6409 $19.47 6419 $20.46 Animal Services Officer 6441 $22.84 6481 $27.88 6491 $29.31 Assistant Engineer 6488 $28.88 6528 $35.25 6538 $37.05 Assistant Planner 6468 $26.13 6508 $31.90 6518 $33.54 Assistant Pool Manager 6305 $11.60 6345 $14.16 6355 $14.87 Associate Engineer 6518 $33.53 6558 $40.94 6568 $43.03 Associate Planner 6487 $28.73 6527 $35.07 6537 $36.86 Box Office Assistant 6290 $10.76 6330 $13.13 6340 $13.81 Box Office Specialist 6311 $11.95 6351 $14.58 6361 $15.33 Budget Analyst 6498 $30.35 6538 $37.05 6548 , $38.95 Building Inspector 6464 $25.61 6504 $31.27 6514 $32.87 Business License Clerk 6378 $16.69 6418 $20.38 6428 $21.42 Community Improvment Officer I 6421 $20.67 6461 $25.34 6471 $26.53 Community Improvment Officer II 6441 $22.84 6481 $27.88 6491 $29.31 Community Programs Coordinator 6450 $23.89 6490 $29.16 6500 $30.66 Community Programs Specialist 6437 $22.39 6477 $27.33 6487 $28.73 Community Services Coordinator 6450 $23.89 6490 , $29.16 6500 $30.66 Community Services Specialist 6350 $14.51 6390 $17.71 6400 $18,62 Community Services Supervisor 6480 $27.75 6520 $33.87 6530 $35.60 Community Services Technician 6437 $22.39 6477 $27.33 6487 $28.73 Department Director 6562 $42.17 6604 $51.50 6707 $86.92 Department Manager 6525 $34.73 6566 $42.60 6634 $59.81 Deputy City Clerk 6430 $21.62 6470 $26.40 6480 $27.75 Division Supervisor 6416 $20.16 6457 $24.74 6554 $40.13 Electrician 6457 $24.74 6497 $30.20 6507 $31.75 Energy Efficiency Coordinator 6372 $16.19 6412 $19.77 6422 $20.78 Engineering Aide 6421 $20.67 6461 $25.24 6471 $26.53 Engineering Technician 6441 $22.84 6481 $27.88 6491 $29.31 Environmental Resources Intern 6280 $10.23 6320 $12.48 6330 $13.13 Equipment Operator 6425 $21.09 6465 $25.75 6475 $27.06 GIS Programmer/Analyst 6456 , $24.61 6496 $30.05 6506 $31.58 GIS Intern 6320 $12.48 6360 $15.24 6370 $16.03 GIS Technician 6436 $22.28 6476 $27.20 6486 $28.59 Healthy Cities Coordinator , 6372 $16.19 6412 $19.77 6422 $20.78 Human Resources Clerk 6389 $17.62 6429, $21.51 _ 6439 $22.61 City Part-Time Hourly Pay Ranges December 17, 2014 P73 Resolution No. 14-220 PART-TIME CITY POSITIONS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Hourly Pay Ranges Effective January 1, 2015 Minimum Control Point Maximum Part Time Positions Stec, Amount . Step Amount Sten Amount Human Resources Technician 6399 $18.52 6439 $22.61 6449 $23.77 Instructor/Guard I 6255 $9.03 6280 $10.23 6290 $10.76 Instructor/Guard II 6280 $10.23 6320 $12.48 6330 $13.13 Lead Mechanic 6440 $22.73 6480 $27.75 6490 $29.16 Library Aide 6255 $9.03 6277 $10.09 6287 $10.59 Librarian I 6433 $21.95 6473 $26.79 6483 $28.16 Library Assistant I 6362 $15.41 6402 $18.81 6412 $19.77 Library Assistant II 6404 $18.99 6444 $23.20 6454 $24.37 Library Clerk 6346 $14.22 6386 $17.37 6396 $18.25 Library Page 6255 $9.03 6277 $10.09 6287 $10.59 Library Page II 6280 $10.23 6320 $12.48 6330 $13.13 Library Technician 6393 $17.98 6433 $21.95 6443 $23.07 Maintenance Technician 6280 $10.23 6320 $12.48 6330 $13.13 Management Aide 6440 $22.73 6480 $27.75 6490 $29.16 Management Analyst I 6470 $26.40 6510 $32.22 6520 $33.87 Management Analyst II 6498 $30.35 6538 $37.05 6548 $38.95 Mechanic 6430 $21.62 6470 $26.40 6480 $27.75 Office Services Clerk 6369 $15.95 6409 $19.41 6419 $20.47 Office Specialist I 6332 $13.25 6372 $16.19 6382 $17.02 Office Specialist II 6352 $14.65 6392 $17.89 6402 $18.80 Outreach Technician 6311 $11.95 6351 $14.58 6361 $15.33 Park Ranger 6352 $14.65 6392 $17.89 6402 $18.80 Planning Aide 6320 $12.48 6360 $15.24 6370 $16.03 Planning Manager 6583 $46.37 6623 $56.62 6633 $59.51 Playschool Instructor 6311 $11.95 6351 $14.58 6361 $15.33 Pool Manager 6329 $13.07 6369 $15.95 6379 $16.76 Principal Engineer 6567 $42.82 6607 $52.77 6617 $54.95 Program Specialist 6311 $11.95 6351 $14.58 6361 $15.33 Public Services Technician I 6413 $19.86 6453 $24.25 6463 $25.49 Public Services Technician II 6423 $20.88 6463 $25.49 6473 $26.79 Public Services Technician III 6443 $23.07 6483 , $28.16 6493 $29.60 Public Works Inspector I 6444 $23.19 6484 $28.31 6494 $29.75 Public Works Inspector II 6464 $25.62 6504 $31.27 6514 $32.87 Purchasing Clerk 6368 $15.87 6408 $19.37 6418 $20.37 Receptionist 6342 $13.94 6382 $17.02 6392 $17.89 Records Clerk 6344 $14.08 6384 $17.19 6394 $18.08 Records Coordinator 6372 $16.19 6412 $19.77 6422 $20.78 Recreation Attendant 6255 $9.03 6277 $10.09 6287 $10.59 Recreation Assistant 6266 $9.54 6306 $11.65 6316 $12.26 Recreation Leader 6290 $10.76 6330 $13.13 6340 $13.81 Secretary 6394 $18.07 6434 $22.06 6444 $23.18 Senior Accountant 6498 $30.35 6538 $37.05 6548 $38.95 City Part-Time Hourly Pay Ranges December 17, 2014 P74 Resolution No. 14-220 PART-TIME CITY POSITIONS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Hourly Pay Ranges Effective January 1, 2015 Minimum Control Point Maximum Part Time Positions Sten Amount Sten Amount Sten Amount Senior Civil Engineer 6543 $37.99 6583 $46.37 6593 $48.75 Signal and Lighting Technician 6452 $24.12 6492 $29.46 6502 $30.96 Sports Official 6311 $11.95 6351 $14.58 6361 $15.33 Swim Aide , 6266 $9.54 6306 $11.65 6316 $12.26 Theatre Technician I 6311 $11.95 6351 $14.58 6361 $15.33 Theatre Technician II 6372 $16.19 6412 $19.77 6422 $20.78 Veterinarian 6579 $45.46 6619 $55.50 6629 $58.33 Veterinary Assistant 6407 $19.27 6447 $23.52 6457 $24.74 Veterinary Technician 6437 $22.40 6477 $27.33 6487 $28.73 II City Part-Time Hourly Pay Ranges December 17, 2014 P75 STAFF REPORT S ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP Lt S RANCHO Date: December 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Subject: APPROVAL OF AN INTERIM APPOINTMENT OF A CALPERS RETIREE TO FILL THE CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR POSITION WHILE AN OPEN RECRUITMENT IS CONDUCTED RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga appoint Marie Macias as the Interim City Clerk Services Director while the City conducts an open recruitment to fill the soon to be vacant position. This is in accordance with Government Code Section 21221 (h). This appointment would be for a period not to exceed six months and would be in conformance with CaPPERS Circular letter 200-002-14 regarding post service retirement employment requirements. BACKGROUND The City recently conducted a recruitment for the position of Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager. While hundreds of applicants applied, less than a handful seemed to meet the minimum qualifications, only a couple were interviewed, and none were passed on to second interviews. Therefore, the City will be reopening the recruitment. In order to provide the same level of professional services that the City has received from the retiring Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, the City is asking the City Council to approve the appointment of Marie Macias as an interim City Clerk Services Director. Ms. Macias is a CaIPERS retiree; also referred to as a retired annuitant. In order to hire a CaIPERS retiree to fill a vacant executive position on an interim basis, the City Council is required to approve the appointment. Ms. Macias has extensive City Clerk experience, and she has managed City Clerk departments in Pomona and other communities. She recently oversaw the City Clerk Department in Lake Forest on an interim basis and is certified as a Master Municipal Clerk by the International Institute of Municipal Clerks. City Management has interviewed and reviewed the work history of Ms. Macias and has made her a conditional offer of employment, contingent upon City Council approval and completion of the City's required conditions of employment. • Assuming successful completion of the conditions of employment, Ms. Macias would be paid an hourly rate of$47.07; the hourly equivalent of the top step of the current Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager. In accordance with CaIPERS law, retired annuitants cannot receive any additional P76 APPROVAL OF AN INTERIM APPOINTMENT OF A CALPERS RETIREE TO FILL THE PAGE 2 CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR POSITION WHILE AN OPEN RECRUITMENT IS CONDUCIED DECEMBER 17,2014 compensation or benefits from the City, unless otherwise required by law. The Interim City Clerk Services Director would be an "at-will" employee, and the City Manager can terminate the employment relationship at any time with or without notice and with or without cause. The appointment of the Interim City Clerk Services Director would be effective no sooner than January 5, 2014. Attachment 1. CaIPERS Circular letter 200-002-14 • . P77 California Public Employees' Retirement System P.O. Box 942709 Sacramento, CA 94229-2709 Reference No.: I,4 (888)CaIPERS (or 888-225-7377) Circular Letter No.: 200-002-14 TTY: (877)249-7442 Distribution: IV, V,VI,X,XII,XVI Ca1PERS www.calpers.ca.gov Special: Circular Letter January 14, 2014 TO: ALL CALPERS EMPLOYERS SUBJECT: POST SERVICE RETIREMENT EMPLOYMENT REQUIREMENTS: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' PENSION REFORM ACT OF 2013 (PEPRA, ASSEMBLY BILL 340), SENATE BILL 1021 & SENATE BILL 13 The purpose of this Circular Letter is to inform you of the current requirements for post- retirement employment of CaIPERS retirees on service retirement only. These changes are the result of amendments and additions to the Government Code by Senate Bill (SB) 1021, Assembly Bill (AB) 340, the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), and Senate Bill (SB) 13. This letter provides an overview of the laws governing post-retirement employment and the consequences of unlawful employment to retirees and employers. Attached to this letter is a quick reference guide, the EMPLOYER CHECKLIST FOR HIRING CaIPERS RETIREES, to aid in the hiring process. . To provide some background, PEPRA added sections 7522.56 and 7522.57 to the Government Code (GC) effective January 1, 2013 which set forth post-retirement employment requirements applicable to all retirees who are employed by CaIPERS • . employers on or after January 1, 2013. To the extent that provisions under the Public . Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) dealing with employment after retirement (GC sections 21220 through 21230) are not in conflict with the aforementioned PEPRA post- retirement employment provisions, the PERL provisions also apply. Public Agency,and School employers must enroll retirees in the myICaIPERS system; State employers must enroll retirees in Personnel Information Management System (PIMS). CaIPERS employers have enrolled more than 13,200 retirees since the launch of the myICaIPERS system. While enrolling retirees allows CaIPERS to track compliance with applicable statutes, it is the responsibility of both the retiree and the employer to ensure compliance with all applicable statutes. . • • • P78 Circular Letter No.: 200-002-14 January 14, 2014 Page 2 SUMMARY OF CURRENT REQUIREMENTS Retirees can be hired into retired annuitant' positions to perform work of limited duration. Limited duration means the appointment is not for an indefinite period of time and that it is not an appointment to a part-time regular staff position. The work a retiree performs should supplement the work of regular staff (e.g., it is extra help work such as elimination of backlog, special project work, or to help with work in excess of that which regular staff can do) or should be authorized "during an emergency to prevent stoppage of public business" such as in the case of floods, earthquakes, etc.. Retired annuitants can perform this limited duration work for up to a.maximum,of 960 hours per fiscal year, can be paid up to the maximum hourly rate paid to employees doing similar work without any other compensation or benefits, and must have the skill set needed to perform the retired annuitant work. In sum, retired annuitants should neither be considered a permanent solution to business needs nor should retired annuitants be allowed to work indefinitely. As previously, before beginning post-retirement work all new retirees must meet the bona fide separation in service requirement of GC section 21220.5 if the retiree is under normal retirement age. Additionally, all new retirees are now subject to a 180 day wait period before beginning post-retirement work. These two requirements, the bona fide break and the 180 day wait period, can be met concurrently. There are four exceptions (see page 4 of this Circular Letter) to the 180 day wait period, but a retiree who receives a Golden Handshake or any other retirement-related incentive is disqualified from any exception and must meet the 180 day wait period. A retiree who receives unemployment insurance payments for retired annuitant work with any public employer within the previous 12 months is barred from retired annuitant work with any CaIPERS employer for 12 months. The following sections give more information about the various types of retired annuitant appointments and the specific requirements for each. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Generally, if the position in which a retiree will work is one that is subject to CaIPERS membership where an active employee would earn CaIPERS service credit, i.e. there is an employer-employee relationship, then a retiree hired to work in that position is subject to the retirement law requirements. The common law employment test is used by the courts and CaIPERS Board of Administration to determine "employee" or "independent contractor" status under the PERL. Under this test, a position title or characterization of the services performed is not the only determining factor of employee / independent contractor status. Just because a retiree is retained for a position that is called an independent contractor, consultant or third-party employer position, does not necessarily mean employment in that position is exempt from the retired annuitant requirements. Therefore, a retiree retained to work as an "independent contractor", "consultant", or through a "third party employer" in any position that would meet the common law employment test may be CaIPERS retirees employed by CaIPERS employers are known as"retired annuitants"or "rehired annuitants". P79 Circular Letter No.: 200-002-14 January 14, 2014 Page 3 subject to mandatory reinstatement from retirement if the employment does not otherwise meet the retirement law requirements. 1) 960-Hour per Fiscal Year Limit: A retired annuitant may be employed up to a maximum of 960 hours per fiscal year for all CaIPERS employers, without exception. There is no provision in the law to allow a retired annuitant to "volunteer" hours while employed. Retired annuitants who work more than the 960 hour maximum per fiscal year under any circumstances are out of compliance with statute and subject to mandatory reinstatement. CSU retired academics, hired under Government Code section 21227, are limited to 960 hours in a fiscal year or 50 percent of the hours the member was employed during the last fiscal year of service prior to retirement, whichever is less. 2) Retiree Compensation: The compensation paid to retirees cannot be less than the minimum nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 hours per month, to equal an hourly rate. Retirees cannot receive any benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefits, or other form of compensation in addition to the hourly pay rate. 3) Limited Duration Appointment: Retirees cannot be hired into vacant permanent or regular staff positions except as an interim appointment under GC section 21221(h) appointment (as discussed below), regardless of whether the positions are part-time or full-time. Retirees should be hired into retired annuitant- designated positions only. A retired annuitant appointment should have a beginning date and an end date. A retiree can be hired to perform work of limited duration, meaning extra help work such as the elimination of a backlog, to perform special project work, or to perform work in excess of that which regular staff can do. Limited duration work does not mean an indefinite appointment to a permanent part-time position. 4) Retiree Skills2: There should be some showing in the retiree's work history that he or she has previous experience and the skill set needed to perform the desired work. Some examples include: the skill set and previous experience as a police officer to perform extra help law enforcement work, prior janitorial experience to perform similar services, or prior engineer experience, and so • forth. • • 2 Though specific retiree skills may not be a prerequisite during an emergency to prevent stoppage of public business, there must be a true emergency in order to fall within this category. Otherwise, the retiree skills are required. P80 Circular Letter No.: 200-002-14 January 14, 2014 Page 4 JNTERIM APPOINTMENT —APPLICABLE PORTIONS OF GOVERNMENT CODE section 21221(hj The governing bodies of contracting agencies are authorized by the applicable provisions of GC section 21221(h) to appoint a retiree to fill a vacant position on an interim basis during the recruitment to permanently fill the vacant position. Contracting agencies for this purpose are public agencies and county offices of education. 1) Interim Appointment by Governing Body: These appointments must be made by the governing body of the employer and are generally used for single or unique positions such as interim city manager, police chief, director, or other managerial and executive positions. 2) Open Recruitment for a Permanent Replacement Required: An open recruitment to permanently fill the vacant position is required in order to appoint a retiree. A retiree hired as an interim appointment without an open recruitment could be subject to mandatory reinstatement. A retiree hired as a permanent appointment is subject to mandatory reinstatement. 3) Limited Duration Appointment: A retiree can be appointed only once to the position, thus the employment terms must specify an end date and cannot be amended to extend the appointment term. A retiree appointed more than once is subject to mandatory reinstatement. 180 DAY WAIT PERIOD GC section 7522.56 provides that a retiree is eligible for post-retirement employment 180 days following his or her retirement date. This requirement applies to retiree employment that begins after January 1, 2013. There are four exceptions to the 180 day wait period including, (a) firefighter or public safety officer (which status is determined in accordance with the definition set forth in CCR3 579.25) hired to perform a function or functions regularly performed by a public safety officer or firefighter, (b) Public agency or school employer provides a resolution certifying the nature of the employment and that the appointment is necessary to fill a critically needed position before 180 days has passed; (c) State agency employer certifies the nature of the employment and that the appointment is necessary to fill a critically needed state employment position before 180 days has passed and submits the information to California Department of Human Resources (CaIHR) to obtain approval; CaIHR then provides the approval and documentation to CaIPERS , and (d) the retiree participates in a qualifying California State Universities (CSU) Faculty Early Retirement Program (FERP). Additional information about these exceptions can be found in the Employer Checklist for Hiring CaIPERS Retirees. However, if a retiree receives a Golden Handshake or any other retirement-related incentive, the 180 day wait period applies without exception. Please note, if a retiree is employed without meeting the 180 day wait period and without an allowable exception, he or she is subject to immediate reinstatement from 3 California Code of Regulations P81 Circular Letter No.: 200-002-14 January 14, 2014 Page 5 retirement. There is no provision in the retirement law to retroactively remedy a violation of the 180 day wait period. BONA FIDE SEPARATION IN SERVICE All service retirees must meet the bona fide separation in service requirement of GC section 21220.5 if the retiree is under normal retirement age at retirement, even if an exception to the 180 day wait period applies. This is a federal tax law requirement with which CaIPERS must comply in order to maintain its tax-deferred status. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PAYMENTS GC section 7522.56 provides that a retiree cannot be appointed as a retired annuitant if he or she received unemployment insurance payments for retired annuitant work for any public employer within the 12 months prior to the appointment date. The retiree is required to certify to the employer, in writing, that he or she is in compliance with this requirement. If a retired annuitant is subsequently discovered to have violated this requirement, his or her employment must be terminated on the last day of the current pay period and he or she will not be eligible for reappointment by any CaIPERS employer for 12 months following that last day of employment. JNDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS / CONSULTANTS / CONTRACT EMPLOYEES Generally, retirees engaged as true independent contractors, consultants or retained through third party employers, whose employment does not meet the California common law employment test, are not subject to the retirement law requirements. If, however, the employment constitutes a California common law employment (employer- employee) relationship, the employment is subject to the retirement law requirements regardless of its characterization. As noted above, a retiree retained to work as an "independent contractor," consultant," or through a "third-party employer" in any position that would meet the common law employment test may be subject to mandatory reinstatement from retirement if the employment does not otherwise meet the retirement law requirements. It is therefore critical that employers consider the common law employment test factors when considering the use of a retired annuitant. MANDATORY REINSTATEMENT FOR UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT An unlawfully employed retiree is subject to mandatory reinstatement from retirement as follows: • The retiree is reinstated from retirement by CaIPERS. Upon appointment by the employer, he or she becomes the active employee and contributing CaIPERS member of that employer, in the position in which unlawfully employed, and as of the date the unlawful employment began. • The now active employee must pay retroactive member contributions plus interest for the period of unlawful employment and, likewise, the employer will P82 Circular Letter No.: 200-002-14 January 14, 2014 Page 6 pay employer contributions plus interest on the employee's behalf for the period of unlawful employment via retroactive payroll reporting. • The now active employee must reimburse CaIPERS the entire amount of retirement allowance he or she received during the period of unlawful employment. • The member and employer, to the extent each is determined to be at fault, may be required to reimburse CaIPERS for administrative expenses incurred in responding to the investigation and resolution of the unlawful employment. If you have any questions, please call our CaIPERS Customer Contact Center at 888 CaIPERS (or 888-225-7377). ANTHONY SUINE, Chief Benefit Services Division Attachment: Employer Checklist • P83 EMPLOYER CHECKLIST FOR HIRING CaIPERS RETIREES Effective January 1, 2013 POST-RETIREMENT EMPLOYMENT BASICS: Generally, if the position in which a retiree will work is one that is subject to CaIPERS membership where an active employee would earn CaIPERS service credit, i.e. there is an employer-employee relationship, then a retiree hired to work in that position is subject to the retirement law requirements. The common law employment test is used by the courts and CaIPERS Board of Administration to determine "employee" or "independent contractor" status under the PERL. Under this test, a position title or characterization of the services performed is not the only determining factor of employee / independent contractor status. Just because a retiree is retained for a position that is called an independent contractor, consultant or third-party employer position, does not necessarily mean employment in that position is exempt from the retired annuitant requirements. Therefore, a retiree retained to work as an "independent contractor", "consultant", or through a "third party employer" in any position that would meet the common law employment test may be subject to mandatory reinstatement from retirement if the employment does not otherwise meet the retirement law requirements. A retiree hired as an independent contractor, consultant, or contract employee through a third party employer to work in any position that would meet the common law employment control test would be inappropriately appointed under the retirement law and could be subject to mandatory reinstatement from retirement if the employment does not otherwise meet the retirement law requirements. • RETIRED ANNUITANT APPOINTMENTS: CaIPERS retirees cannot be hired into permanent or regular staff positions without reinstatement from retirement. Retirees should be hired into retired annuitant-designated positions only. These appointments are authorized during an emergency to prevent stoppage of public business or because the retiree has skills needed to perform work of limited duration. Since emergencies that would cause stoppage of public business are rare, e.g., disasters such as floods, earthquakes, etc., these appointments are generally those requiring skills needed to perform work of limited duration. • INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND CONTRACT EMPLOYEES THROUGH THIRD PARTY EMPLOYERS: If you, the employer, hire a CaPPERS retiree as an independent contractor, consultant or through a third party employer and the employment constitutes a common law employment (employer-employee) relationship, the employment is subject to the retirement law requirements and he or she must be enrolled as a retired annuitant in the myCaIPERS system. If the employment is truly an independent contractor or consultant or is truly as an employee of a third party employer, i.e., a common law employer-employee relationship does not exist with the CaIPERS employer, then the employment is exempt from the post-retirement employment requirements. 1 P84 EMPLOYER CHECKLIST FOR HIRING CaIPERS RETIREES Effective January 1, 2013 • POST-RETIREMENT EMPLOYMENT AUDIT REVIEW: The CaIPERS Office of Audit Services (OAS) Public Agency Audit Program reviews the hiring and employment of CaIPERS retirees at all employers to ensure compliance with the requirements prescribed by the applicable sections of the California Government Code. • ENROLLMENT AS A RETIRED ANNUITANT: The retiree must be enrolled as a retired annuitant in the mylCalPERS system, either directly in myICaIPERS or, for state agencies, through the Personnel Information Management System (PIMS). ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS BEFORE HIRING A RETIREE: 1. BONA FIDE SEPARATION IN SERVICE REQUIREMENT: All Retirees: If a retiree is under normal retirement age at retirement, he or she cannot be hired for post-retirement employment without a bona fide separation from employment. The normal retirement age is the highest benefit formula age, e.g., age 55 for the 2% @ 55 formula. If there is more than one formula applicable to the retirement, e.g., the allowance has service based on both the 2% @ 55 and the 2% at 60 formula, the normal retirement age is the highest benefit formula age, or age 60, in this example. Members and retirees can look up their benefit formulas through their mylCalPERS online account or on their most recent CaIPERS Annual Member Statement. A bona fide separation must meet both of the following conditions: • There is no pre-determined agreement: Prior to retirement, there was no agreement, written or verbal, between the employer and the member to work after retirement. • There is a 60 day separation from employment: There is a period of 60 calendar days between the retirement date and the post-retirement employment date. This requirement is a federal tax law and we, CaIPERS, must comply with it to maintain our tax-deferred status. 2. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PAYMENT QUALIFICATION: Upon accepting an offer of employment, every retiree must certify in writing to the employer that he or she did not receive any unemployment insurance payments within the 12 months prior to this appointment for previous retired annuitant work with any CaIPERS employer. If after hiring a retiree, you, the employer, discover the retiree did receive unemployment insurance payments, as above, within the 12 months prior to the current appointment date, you must terminate the employment on the last day of the current • 2 P85 EMPLOYER CHECKLIST FOR HIRING CaIPERS RETIREES Effective January 1, 2013 pay period and that retiree is not eligible for reappointment by any CaIPERS employer for 12 months following the last day of employment. 3. 180 DAY WAIT PERIOD BETWEEN RETIREMENT DATE & HIRE DATE: All retirees must wait 180 days after their retirement date before he or she is eligible to begin post-retirement employment. This means a retiree cannot begin employment until the 181st day after his or her retirement date. There are four exceptions to the 180 day wait period requirement: 180 Day Wait Period Exceptions: • Firefighter or public safety officer: The retiree is a firefighter or public safety officer, as determined in accordance with the definition set forth in California Code of Regulations 579.25, hired to perform a function or functions regularly performed by a public safety officer or firefighter. • Public agency or school employer certification and resolution: The public agency or school employer must certify the nature of the employment and that the appointment is necessary to fill a critically needed position before 180 days has passed and, the appointment must be approved by the governing body of the employer in a public meeting. The appointment may not be placed on a consent calendar. For school employers, the school district's county office of education is the governing body that must pass this resolution. The certification and resolution should be received by CaIPERS prior to the retiree's hire date. Email the certification and resolution to the mailbox BNSD_Post_Retirement_Administration @calpers.ca.gov or mail it to Post Retirement Administration, Benefit Services Division, PO Box 942711, Sacramento, CA 94229-2711. o Sample resolutions with instructions are available online at www.calpers.ca.gov. • State agency certification and resolution: State agencies must obtain approval from CaIHR via the Personnel Management Liaisons (PML) Memorandum titled Retired Annuitants Hiring Exception Procedure, Reference No. 2013-001. CaIHR submits the approval to CaIPERS prior to the retiree's hire date. • California State Universities (CSU) FERP exception: The retiree may participate, if eligible, in the Faculty Early Retirement Program (FERP) pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement that existed prior to January 1, 2013, or has been included in subsequent agreements. 3 • P86 EMPLOYER CHECKLIST FOR HIRING CaIPERS RETIREES Effective January 1, 2013 Disqualification for an Exception to the 180-day wait period: • If a retiree accepts a Golden Handshake or any other employer incentive related to retirement, he or she must serve the 180-day wait period regardless of whether he or she would qualify for any of the exceptions above. POST-RETIREMENT EMPLOYMENT RETIRED ANNUITANT REQUIREMENTS: • GC SECTION 7522.56: • Limited Duration Work & Retiree Skills: A CaIPERS retiree can be appointed by the appointing power of the employer without reinstatement or loss of retirement benefits either during an emergency to prevent stoppage of public business or because the retiree has skills needed to perform work of limited duration. Since emergencies, e.g., disasters such as floods or earthquakes, etc., that would cause actual stoppage of public business are rare, these appointments are generally those requiring skills needed to perform work of limited duration. There should be some showing in the retiree's work history that he or she has previous experience and the skill set needed to perform the desired work. o Is this a limited duration position, e.g., extra help work such as elimination of a backlog, work on a special project, or work in excess of what your permanent or regular staff employees can do and, it is not a permanent or regular staff position? o Retiree Skills: Is there some showing in the retiree's work history that he . or she has previous experience and the skill set needed to perform the required work? • 960 Hour Limit per Fiscal Year: o A retiree is limited to working a maximum of 960 hours per fiscal year for all CaIPERS employers. There is no exception to this limit. Retirees can be employed for more than one fiscal year as long as the employment continues to meet all of the requirements otherwise. o CSU academic retirees are limited to 960 hours per fiscal year or 50% of the hours employed during the last fiscal year of service prior to retirement, whichever is less. There is no exception to this limit. 4 • P87 EMPLOYER CHECKLIST FOR HIRING CaIPERS RETIREES Effective January 1, 2013 • Rate of Pay Requirement: o The compensation paid to any retiree must be within the monthly rate of pay range, i.e., cannot be less than the minimum nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary, paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 hours to equal an hourly rate. o No other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefits, or other form of compensation can be paid in addition to this hourly pay rate. • Enrollment in the mylCaIPERS system: o For public agency and school employers, the retiree must be enrolled as a retired annuitant and payrate with hours worked reported in the mylCalPERS system. No retirement contributions are reported by the employer or member for retired annuitants. For state agencies and CSU employers, the retiree must be enrolled as a retired annuitant in PIMS. GC SECTION 21221(h) POSITIONS — SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: This section applies to public agency and school employers. The governing body for a school district is its county office of education. Limited Duration Work & Retiree Skills: • Single interim appointment to a vacant position: The governing body of a public agency or the county office of education of a school employer can appoint a retiree to work in a vacant position during the recruitment to permanently fill the vacancy or during an emergency to prevent stoppage of public business. This section is used to hire retirees on an interim basis to vacant managerial, executive or other unique positions, such as city manager, CIO, CFO, police chief, director, department heads, etc. Since emergencies that would cause the actual stoppage of public business, e.g., disasters such as floods or earthquakes, etc., are rare, these appointments are generally to provide a retiree with the needed skill set to work in the unique position during the recruitment to permanently fill the vacancy. The governing body's appointment should explain the need for the particular retiree's hire and there must be documentation that the governing body made the appointment in the form of a resolution, board minutes, etc. There must be an open recruitment to permanently fill the position in place to hire a retiree. The retiree can be appointed only once to this position, thus, the employment agreement, contract, or appointment document must specify the end date of the appointment. There should be a showing in the retiree's work history that he or she has the previous experience and the skill set to perform the work of the position. 5 P88 EMPLOYER CHECKLIST FOR HIRING CaIPERS RETIREES Effective January 1, 2013 o Is this an interim appointment, i.e., the retiree is not being hired as the permanent employee? o There must be an open recruitment to permanently fill the vacant position before the retiree is appointed. Is there an open recruitment to permanently fill the vacant position? o The retiree can be appointed only once to this position: Does the employment agreement, contract, or appointment document, etc., specify the end date for the appointment? o Is there some showing in the retiree's work history that he or she has previous experience and the skill set needed to perform the work required? o Was this appointment made and duly documented by this employer's governing body? • 960 Hour Limit per Fiscal Year: o The retiree is limited to working a maximum of 960 hours per fiscal year for all CaIPERS employers. There is no exception to this limit. • Rate of Pay Requirement: o The rate of pay range for GC section 21221(h) appointments is the monthly rate of pay range for the vacant position. The compensation paid to the retiree must be within the monthly rate of pay range, i.e., cannot be less than the minimum nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary, divided by 173.333 hours to equal an hourly rate. o No other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefits, or other form of compensation can be paid in addition to this hourly pay rate. • Enrollment in the myICaIPERS system: o The retiree must be enrolled as a retired annuitant and payrate with hours worked reported in the mylCalPERS system. No retirement contributions are reported by the employer or member for retired annuitants. 6 P89 EMPLOYER CHECKLIST FOR HIRING CaIPERS RETIREES Effective January 1, 2013 SERVICE AFTER RETIREMENT ON STATE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS: GC section 7522.57 provides the following conditions and limitations for service on any salaried state board or state commission by a retiree receiving a pension from a public retirement system who is first appointed on or after January 1, 2013: Part-time state board or commission appointment: A retiree may serve without reinstatement or loss of retirement benefits upon appointment to a part-time state board or commission provided the salary received does not exceed $60,000 annually. This salary shall be increased in any fiscal year in which a general salary increase is provided for state employees and such increase shall not exceed the general salary increases provided for state employees. The retiree shall acquire no benefits, service credit, or retirement rights with respect to this employment. Full-time state board or commission appointment: • A CaIPERS retiree may serve on a full-time basis without reinstatement from retirement if he or she serves as a nonsalaried member and shall receive only the per diem authorized to all members of that board or commission. The retiree shall not earn any CaIPERS service credit or benefits or make contributions with respect to the service performed. If a CaIPERS retiree elects to receive the salary applicable to the board or commission, they must reinstate from retirement. • A retiree from a public pension system other than CaIPERS may serve on a full-time basis by choosing one of the following options: o The retiree may serve as a nonsalaried member and continue to receive his or her retirement allowance in addition to any per diem authorized to all members of that board or commission. The retiree shall not earn any CaIPERS service credit or benefits or make contributions with respect to the service performed. o The retiree may suspend his or her retirement allowance or allowances, if receiving more than one, and enroll as a new member of CaIPERS for the service performed on the board or commission. The pensionable compensation earned from this position shall not be eligible for reciprocity with any other retirement system or plan. • 7 P90 EMPLOYER CHECKLIST FOR HIRING CaIPERS RETIREES Effective January 1, 2013 POST-RETIREMENT EMPLOYMENT RESOURCES: Public Agency & Schools Reference Guide http://www.calpers.ca.qov/index.isp?bc=/about/forms-pubs/er-pubs/manuals/pas-ref-q uide.xm I State Reference Guide http://www.calpers.ca.gov/index.isp?bc=/about/forms-pubs/er-pubs/manuals/state-ref-auide.xml Employment after Retirement (Member publication 33) http://www.cal pers.ca.qov/ei p-d ocs/a bout/pubs/member/employment-after-retire.pdf Reinstatement from Retirement (Member publication 37) http://www.calpers.ca.aov/eip-docs/about/pubs/member/reinstatement-retirement.pdf CaIPERS Benefit Services Division for post-retirement employment questions only: Email: BNSD Post Retirement Administration q.calpers.ca.aov Fax: (916) 795-0701 • 8 P91 STAFF REPORT Planning Department RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: December 17, 2014 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - A request to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APN: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. Related cases: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 and Development Review DRC2014-0000127. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - A request to modify the Zoning Map to change land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APN: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. Related cases: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Development Review DRC2014-0000127. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126. BACKGROUND: On September 24, 2014, the Planning Commission approved the Design Review (DRC2014-00127) for a proposed 139,983 square foot warehouse distribution building on a 6.6-acre site. They also made a recommendation that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 to change the General Plan and Zoning Map land use designations for the project site from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI). Just prior to the Planning Commission meeting, Staff received a letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service questioning the Biological Technical Report (Glen Lukos Associates, July 2013) submitted for the project in regards to the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly. The letter recommended that the applicant conduct a follow up study by a "permitted" Delhi Fine Sands (DSF) biologist. The applicant submitted a follow up study (Ecological Sciences, October 27, 2014) by a "permitted" biologist which confirmed that Delhi Fine Sands (DSF) do not exist on the project site. CEQA Section 15073.5 (C(4)) states that the lead agency is not required to recirculate the Mitigated Negative Declaration if the new • information added during the public comment period merely clarifies the original findings. In this case, • • P92 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2014-00012 & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR CSF, INC. December 17, 2014 Page 2 the new study prepared in response to comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service confirmed that the site was not suitable habitat for the Delhi Sand Flower Loving Fly. The site is bordered by Mission Park Drive to the north, Buffalo Avenue to the east and Richmond Place to the west. The project complies with all Development Code requirements except that the Industrial Park (IP) Development District limits the Wholesale, Storage and Distribution and use category to tenant spaces that occupy 50,000 square feet or less. The applicant has submitted a General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00012) and Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-00126) to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial, which permits the Wholesale, Storage and Distribution land use category in tenant spaces that occupy over 50,000 square feet. The Planning Commission reviewed the applicant's request for the General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments and confirmed staff's conclusion that the Development District land use change was a logical change in keeping with the surrounding land uses and recommended that the City Council approve these requests. ANALYSIS: A. General Plan and Zoning Map Amendment: A General Plan Amendment is being requested to change the land use designation of the site from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI). The Development Code distinguishes warehouse/storage/distribution tenants who occupy tenant spaces of 50,000 square feet or less as Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution - Light and tenants who occupy over 50,000 square feet as Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution - Medium. The Industrial Park (IP) Zoning District only permits Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Light and not Medium. The request is accompanied by a Zoning Map Amendment to bring the Zoning Map in line with the proposed amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map. • The applicant is requesting to construct a 139,983 square foot building designed for warehouse/storage/distribution tenants over 50,000 square feet. In order to do so, the land use designation must be changed from Industrial Park (IP) District to General Industrial (GI) District, which permits Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Medium. The land uses to the north, east and west are predominately industrial in nature, including a 461,882 warehouse distribution building to the east and a 190,000 square foot warehouse distribution building to the northwest. The existing commercial development to the south acts as a buffer between the commercial uses along 4th Street and the industrial land uses to the north. • The proposed land use change is logical in that the project site is directly south and adjacent to land with the same zoning designation (General Industrial). And while the land use designation for the parcels to the east and west of the project site remain within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District, the proposed warehouse distribution land use of the project site is consistent with the existing warehouse distribution land uses on the adjacent parcels. The project will visually and operationally fit in with the existing built environment and the surrounding streets are designed to accommodate the level of truck traffic expected at the site. B. Design . Review Committee: •The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) on August 5, 2014. The main issue raised by staff was whether the proposed stone veneer was appropriate for an industrial building. The Committee members indicated that the stone veneer gave the building a more commercial building appearance, which provided a good transition from•the commercial buildings to the south to the industrial • • P93 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2014-00012 &ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR CSF, INC. • December 17, 2014 Page 3 buildings to north east and west. The Committee forwarded the project to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of approval. C. SB18 Tribal Consultation: California State Bill 18 requires that the City send project notification to California tribal communities when a project proposes a General Plan amendment. Notification was sent on February 27, 2014. A letter was received on March 3, 2014, from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians stating that they were not concerned about the proposed General Plan Amendment but wished to stay apprised of the project. Staff forwarded their representative, Joseph Ontiveros, an electronic set of the plans. Staff has not received a return comment to this date. D. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, air quality, greenhouse gas, geology and soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. The Planning Commission reviewed the Initial Study and the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and recommended final approval by the City Council. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, C BAdtom Candyce B rn tt Planning Dir or CB:TV/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Planning Commission Staff Report, date September 24, 2014 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Resolutions Recommending Approval DRC2014- . 00012 and DRC2014-00126 dated September 24, 2014 Exhibit C - Planning Commission Minutes, dated September 24, 2014 Exhibit D - General Plan and Zoning Map— Existing Zoning Exhibit E - General Plan and Zoning Map— Proposed Zoning Exhibit F - Final Mitigated Negative Declaration City Council Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 • City Council Draft Resolution of Approval for Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 +I • P94 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT v/ DATE: September 24, 2014 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission RANCHO FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director CUCAMONGA BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - A request to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APN: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. Related cases: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 and Development Review DRC2014-0000127. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - A request to modify the Zoning Map to change land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APN: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. Related cases: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Development Review DRC2014-0000127. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - Site plan and architectural review of a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APN: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related cases: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following actions: • That the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution approving Design Review DRC2014-00127. • That the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolutions recommending the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- 00126. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): 49 percent (below the maximum 60 percent FAR permitted by General Plan Figure LU2 (Land Use Plan) for the General Industrial (GI) Development District). EXHIBIT A • • P95 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, AND DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR CSF, INC. September 24, 2014 Page 2 B. Zoning Map Designations North - Existing Light Industrial Development; General Industrial (GI) Development District South - Existing Commercial Development; Industrial Park (IP) Development District East - Existing Industrial Development; Industrial Park (IP) Development District West - Existing Industrial Development; Industrial Park (IP) Development District C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Park North - General Industrial South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park ANALYSIS: A. Project Proposal: The applicant is requesting site plan and design review of a 139,983 square foot industrial building on a 6.6-acre site. The site is bordered by Mission Park Drive to the north, Buffalo Avenue to the east and Richmond Place to the west. The project complies with all Development Code requirements except that the Industrial Park (IP) Development District limits the Wholesale, Storage and Distribution land use category to tenant spaces that occupy 50,000 square feet or less. The building is designed with the potential to be subdivided and includes a main entrance off of both Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue. The truck loading docks are located along the south side of the building and are fully screened from the adjacent streets by 8-foot high block walls. Each wall plane of the building is articulated and includes multiple tower elements with glazing and stone veneer. The roof parapets have been designed to fully screen the rooftop equipment. The project includes three water retention basins that will be landscaped. Total landscape coverage including the retention basins is 17 percent, 7 percent in excess of the minimum requirement. • B. General Plan and Zoning Map Amendment: Included in the request is a General Plan Amendment to change the zoning designation of the site from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI). The Development Code distinguishes warehouse/storage/distribution tenants who occupy tenant spaces of 50,000 square feet or less as Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution - Light and tenants who occupy over 50,000 square feet as Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution - Medium. The Industrial Park (IP) District only permits Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Light and not Medium. The applicant is requesting to construct a 139,983 square foot building designed for warehouse/storage/distribution tenants over 50,000 square feet. In order to do so, the land use designation must be changed from Industrial Park (IP) District to General Industrial (GI) District, which permits Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution — Medium. The land uses to the north, east and west are predominately industrial in nature. The existing commercial development to the south acts as a buffer between the commercial uses along 4th Street and the surrounding industrial land uses. The request is accompanied by a Zoning Map Amendment to bring the Zoning Map in line with the General Plan Land Use Map. C. Parking: The project provides 104 parking spaces, 4 parking space in excess of the 100 required parking spaces (see table below). The warehouse also includes 14 dock doors • P96 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, AND DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR CSF, INC. September 24, 2014 Page 3 which require 1 additional trailer parking space per dock door. The project provides 15 trailer spaces, 1 in excess of the minimum requirement. LAND USE PARKING REQUIREMENT REQUIRED PARKING 12,000 SF Office 1/1,000 SF 48 20,000 SF Warehouse 1/1,000 First 20,000 SF 20 20,000 SF Warehouse 1/1,000 Second 20,000 SF 10 88,000 SF Warehouse 1/4,0000 Remaining SF 22 Total SF = 40,000 Parking Required = 100 D. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) on August 5, 2014. The main issue raised by staff was whether the proposed stone veneer was appropriate for an industrial building. The committee members felt that the stone veneer gave the building a more commercial building appearance, which provided a good transition from the commercial buildings to the south to the industrial buildings to north east and west. The Committee forwarded the project to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of approval. E. SB18 Tribal Consultation: California State Bill 18 requires that the City send project notification to California tribal communities when a project proposes a General Plan amendment. Notification was sent on February 27, 2014. A letter was received on March 3, 2014, from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians stating that they were not concerned about the proposed General Plan Amendment but wished to stay apprised of the project. Staff forwarded their representative, Joseph Ontiveros, an electronic set of the plans. Staff has not received a return comment to this date. F. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, air quality, greenhouse gas, geology and soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff has not received any letters or phone calls expressing concern over the Conditional Use Permit. Respectfully submitted, 1 <O Candyce Bu ett Planning Director CB:TV/ge P97 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, AND DRC2014-00127 -COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR CSF, INC. September 24, 2014 Page 4 Attachments: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Design Review Committee Action Agenda for August 5, 2014 Exhibit C - Initial Studies I and II Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan DRC2014-00012 Resolution Recommending Approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2014-00127 _ 31V0 .1 f.pON. 31.0 . s.omw3. wetu...w..., «, dd+u 3nr o,rfrr ows j I e z - ____ : f wea. n.oms,roo........ 2131N3O OIlS31YW V'JNOYMOfYJ OHONVLI 111,:l�:°92 Y _1398 � r ` ................as..Wesa 1N311dO13A301VILLLSf10NI A1TV3N 3I1S31 01 �! ;; 4 Q y. --:�.. _ a,..oa.ouarw.s»o1....vo i:1: NVId 3115 •,1i' ti yy 112”3.4 yy • Y €r 1 $ a i;;; s' • 3 "12128 I- § z o. i` �� r w gg j \ cn a mil 3I € � 1 1n iii 9 e - - . .,: , -- -=';�_� Air/ / �'.. - - e��� p�biill3�lEtl}IIyE., - - � i t �, �_ ,i! ;1:,, j - o-9. 5„ ` ° R pd 1 `■ 4 eaa� 4 f YY , , ,� = , —T o 4 � i a ;6 a I a I ii! . 1 I[lt SFt• ; ' v $�1WFi : a S �� .- i 9N $ egg i 5 ,M I m °o 9ga--!124 .m ft 1:2 II I �� E�� T1.11111110 A -—-—i-- - -—- -t------ I i s M —0> 05 09 € gm ii cZ1 6PI9.00B 11' i g -j_ -�Jf + - I i U I _ 1 '�x _=F s. ;_ �. 1{ lif ii it. ?�Ir: In ea ?i �j a0eld Puowyuia -----F�------ ----- -----�- _ ' as _.---i ........, ____ _,___ 1 < i_. 0 ' 1 i ti l I 1 1 z 1.1 ! 1 ! ',i 7 I �.. O _, 1,11 3 w w ,,I " ro w > > = I x111. w „ a • z ; III ]5 - _>.- Inc d g _m w w 1111 a w ■ 0 PC 6i/ t11 ILI EXHIBIT EXHIBIT A 3LVD .A SxaSIAAA aLro n SNNISA A 1:1 X99 v v,nD w,xve�3niDO xenaxaSSxl :i1. Vs' - Lvwmolew-7A'L 2131.1430 0113311/Y4 VONOWVO(10 OHONVH 1710 g &g _ - Lae-wLa � . l � I a l}s 1N3WdOl3A3O lVR113f10Nl AllV3L1 OI1S3fYW Lp�p a.vM.0011 o aie �, 11115 y110 y Q �..-....�... al`wimuanxLSNro vDllwvo� SNOIlVA3l3 MORl31X3 1L,! 6 1.1• jJ P ,y1 IMICIMMUlaill id, 1 N .e. `° J` I inu an ua!j a 3 6 i6 Dl A. A 9 ¢¢¢ o/ II 3 -I 1 1_',I �i H� F F yi C EN __1 :111 iii £l1 I 1 HI `.!!■ 1® @ �: a F ��'. 1ft8I�y I Z L 1 U Si '71 Iw MN III emu /I■aa/■■ O 1 III ■■a/■■■ 11■■as•■a' N w III €�- w I �I� . - iiAi■°� i � .•��� , � A�� 1 /I■/.■■ 1 III ill . e '■■■M■■ "s E II aI1Y/� ■ g �"' ; 1 II f ■ad■■■ -.�I® k Q■��■■_ I alma 9■ i II a g ■/�sa gg @3@3 II• aiala®■■ i9 ar■ Z t '1 ciE 111111111111111111111 !t NMI ° ii■ate■■ imuittignmis w lt ■■` ' 11111111 › i".;/- ,lid ■■semen w , 51iia■■■ i� nRIE s® •• i 1111 'ill ION P lit,?1111 III :!1■■.■■ 1111111 MN . mini -J Q II §�I N■al■■■ IMBIBE NI i0 LIN 111 OMNI II ill 3 jj'ao■■ I- • Ma 61 ilii®■■. £�E , ! d ■II 1 ■aal,■■ ■■a®■■ 1 �N ■na1 11 ■lie! (I 1 ■■ t•■■ N1f niiii p �■!■1''' y lie sSb CUE i 3 t■■as.■■ a ■■Mas■■. E St � L<av'.. E El.. . tn. /1■aiM■■,. lig i Iliii®i E 1 a G :■ ■• t. • II1 1 < sae ■■ills■ i �L aln■' o 1111111111111111 al i �1■ • > AIMS 115:;,,_ 1 El Ill LIJ 4 1 ii LU 7. I I I .) ill i , ��11 D W 1 d'm ®1,I�:,��i1�:le N e� I, zli l 4lii 1i JA .Q . . y NAL © .__.___._ CO L O na I- Y�% C 5 e f __— I i�off- ► 1! ----/1!le11ilIIII — ... 47 r' 0 0 P' 00 ill! 1¢# � � a ��. E ill ,. �-- rr 1I _4 , i t a , y — a — F k 1 , I. i I •1 F_ yen i ` r- .,44:,xn <'',sf r x� '":1.'1'''''' ,, 0 .7, ,i, t vast- ,...:-,----- - f.;1 " Ma,24 2011 3 C ' a ,f i k e *74,-°` I " n,< . k"x g tt � W � -, 0Z� Icil g 0010 1 3° CZ /4 DI r z>co c0 r >z o r- .- —, - �.... E 0 0 • : ',. Y.101 aQ -i 9 Uj0 :Id- QLQ7 g �QU 140)0 ®CtU # 610 Q CC y ,„..,,,,,. .,,,;17.7,. .:::144.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,cif,.,,,,..„., -.. J4,-...,.:.t 4ri--...,;- ,r „i2titiesitsemiglittL - 4, .4. - -- r k Fzt fiq;. } b a 8 t * J i I -' Mt a R.* $ i x s 4. Flit1:1311., - ii —ror , .,..,,,,;,,-,-„i-_, -_4 t v ax 1 �-1� II ��pNF�� s } � i. � x .�4Ctf �"' s.� E L'i .- ate.` +,,0),,.,y°. 1.-r-cr.. r' ter..S:: P-- . ., d: S" R k / * sv ., i t -- ''N k, ''' ' A-2_ ___:,. — _1.:-:_-_". .,— , 7,4$41411 4 1.4,ttr_.,.1.,.._ .44, , i- , , , 1 , w.,1:IT: 1 Ak 4._f..5 -rt: x �' fi=t, hrs , i' . • 9 a4:r ..-- - Mgr ,1 if + a i„ea spa. = ale a i i E t � ,".'# 77 ar !! .Y 11 .1- w i f t 11;31 (Ili 0 S i R102 I E _ �Q u, _ y t b iiii%i I;11 ill d to Q Will P i} > cif E ilk �.�� t wN"w`4sas ss Y 9 I< 3 p. g Eg rolr33-' � � Wff o .6" s e •j �EOZ 3n i /Ali �? s I � � s �� ®5'� fir l• 5 c z 3 a • 010 nn:LE1 i[1 33Y N3MIlll >,i, R / Q U , aWc Q� Ba — et—o OP lit it FR 1 I ft P onoo ii hI j i l' A Expi wzz ®U 1 I 1 I \:, ','' 0 1 .oz voR .• GGG :1.) �; ..111 01 es. *+.........matt a :.::.iyrr ao•..Lu _ SABsIa.;@ t IWO a �[ s.w -lam ih.H.'' ''''‘gi:-, I. ,' IP, 91111110 I. .. , r 1111311,,, ,_,---- - 1.4 .11-1, . ,,, ,I.. 0 ,,:, :.qv) - ,, I I ►iilli ip 0 1~� �;�►1� Y F I16i, 111 ®►. r� i I I �B\Id / All id- I:• .a_.Ill III i��®�� n I di ilea lig;Ai II �" a _ •InnI iI Ii ,i I ..........._- ■ iel id ii i g .I .'III 3 i 1,ki , ,7 t e I J II I_ I -- R 114 0r� I I ; :R1 1 i l vf,i a kvirL, b 1� PI iI � 8 � � x6t , . A . . Pi i 6iii -----------------------------------=-----------t.-f.af:f.:-.------------:- -----"°----- "i= [Ili 1 I --===zz—. -----._ 1 i i rt le I II 0 0 $ �t103 st. Q i . 5 ti c0 1 WA QUm1 g 40 1 g u � cr P 6N �0 g� z 1120 BUQ A hocdoPr 9 1 a , : ..ig ! i 5 1 21 I 114 c WW I 1 .Z 6!! s 13 a t l' { I _........... 7as j YY y cf 1.x ` ` w w o A w, › , ,, . ,:I A I .i I sr vi:, o d O P I § Qua Iii u! .III `r , i'f 1154 V Ft z J _ x 0 a �- a w w � 61i • fii 451 6, leSk; 1 1 1 i 1 I I / 1 i .--.-.... li --._ ...__ 1 IIi I _ ---.__ .,_ .I _ • rs ,__ - 7,..... ; : n 1. • T.- I IT I 1 lk , 0 Ig ?:. ; . I I • ,1•1 . ti 111 0 1.4 1 1 t ; 4 = I 0 : , I 1 I i 1 1 ■ ' i 1 1 g ! 1 I ' ' (---- x 00-4:27.e IP.4 I 14 1 . I ,::„ .,.......„; .. , !_...... , • :,.... , t_.}. I , „ , , , , ! II .....1 . _ Ah . : . , — ,_, il. 11 r-- • h / ...._ : o --. • I V..._ 1 I ---- 1 I . IIIIIII -II;.0. . ... ir.r....- 4,441, T - }, _ .... . - __IMPPM___ AMMO --WIMP ......_......- '.3.,.. .1 --• . f'---- --\\ r Apr 00 20 It 14 \ \ 1 i \ \ 0 k 1 0 > z2(1)U 0011N Icil 00)93 °VII ci,-7E HI or o 4 > 00 I g81110. :. 0Kac)c P !1::.:151IIIIII: -0 ° zr i >zo i; o 4 On' 'Air 1 0g3 il ' i ifig. dd - 1 *;d, , ' -----"ft -- il 0 124 . 1 E tO II • r.= i' 1 il! 11-61 Z 'I! ril ,! 0 g t- I s A A .-••-:.....,. 1 i . • . • . •. • - •- . --....... ..._ . _ 1 i -. -.- . ._" - - —1 1 ■-: t ..-____. _ . '.., .. a f . I :3; .111.711 .7' . : '.•;: . 4 • 4 4 4 4 4 ;. ,t I ,„44..44•+-44.=7 ,,,7,1. .'k,--1.—E—!• , 4..44.44- /i‘,7.t-,t4,4 itilti-44,,, . -.Pir j.-.1".1'..- t.i-t4i'4 ?.. i•'., i c... i. , .... t ' ''. 7 •: 1. 1 ''?. t : ':. : : Z :2: 1 1 t kV:t::: ;7 , • ,,i.,-,,,-..:, • - .z:i:I; .7.,i,,; ii;;:=;.•:t:,,t'i.,5: 1: i i .!-;.--I ' '" IC'''. : •llit 1 . t ;;;.;," :11''4 i". FS.'id Zi',: t 4:t i.';i 4::•;; ;.,:. ,, • " ;1-) i.- .1.--7:. ';‘,/F- :.'"i."*. i•!,-.... .. '':-...r.: ..?'...., '7.-;4—..., ... ..!..; :,, 7..„--.-:;.„Ii,, r . __,_.._„..„ „ , ?...,,. } ,...., ..... 7 :1. ". .. ...,:-. : - : . t ... . ., -;■. ;, ; ; ; 11 , :- ,. ;..1 ..i :- 2. - _,4,--t•-f,i - - - - -'' ' ' .. .. -. : : : ''' '- ' ' 1: •.',. 1. 1 . ,. - r• • • "-z.• , C .; r. C .: _ :.. ". ,. ... .t. i .. .., zr. ,,, 6 - - - 1 tirft... .0.' 11'; '•;/••• . : 7 ,-; •: ';1,1 •- •: Z .. : .1. .° 1.--::,1 i "f. :lig.. I ,,';,7.,„ , ,. , , -,,-g: := , g .; ..; : ,: •;.(g 1 t : 'i,1 ?". '', 4 4: ; ;: ,t ;!E ' ' ' '4 I 111 •p . -1,* - — •-•-1-1 - • * i. '' : :., ••.•1 4 . s. • I; , . 1 i., :: ,• ; I; . : 111.•••-[ '1; 1: f 11 t i1111111''''11 1:17 1: 11 7 2'-' `.: ; ",; ,.. ...2' rr. .,:11- r,: x ; 'zi ": : .:..-. ... .;. :: , I..; , : .,..., •T t.„/.. ;::, ' ' 7 ..::: : : 7. ;: ',I. : : : : :. : : ,'. i..-• 4 ; ; : : : '. '. ., :: : , : r'• r. -,- g 1,7, : - - :;; , :, , .,. .4 :: .7 : 4 C.• 7 '' (t 4 t .; . .. - , - . : . . : : cD .,..:_:.:._._....-----.- . -- - - -4. . .1. •; -.. 1 ,-, "7 Z . ..; : # 7. 1.. .'. . : , . : ; ;';; ;; ; 7, ;; g: , ; : 44 1.1 f .7 , :....-,. •..1 ; i.: ,..1. ;,,,,, -.,' .. : , ; i 1 11 . - . ■ 7; . • 1 , . . 1: 1:. 1:- - • -1 - • 1' 1 ' - ' '-'• `-: L' t .1.1: •, •- • ir ! . II . , I 4. b - • - - - , , l •.%' :: :, : z.:.: Z , C ":. '..t -: :. ; `.• 1.10'..• ,..• r. ; .i : ; '37; ; Z 11 0 CZ:2%1 . l; I 7, :: ', .::. '- ' ' .f: i .i: : ; ; .-... : ; : : : :: 4 7 ,': 7 2.,N. 4,.._:• ..r, . •,, it• 1 L: ,-.• ; •••••• ,..= • 1 r7•"...-;-7;-72-1,7-777:7-7-rr-1-7=-7.7-7-,:l-,F11-7',..--C.,1-.ii C-7-1- ' I l• •: 4 ; E . 1. 4 T.•‘• =-."-.'....'..: '' :; t :::t.: ;:. :: t 7 .... ,1. 7 7. .'. 1 ''. ;t 6;1 4, ti;.;; ,': ; • .1 11 r .1., r t t •._i_sr...• -,,, : - .. .,;:-.. - - ,: .. - :, - t$ M; ; i.:ri.t : : ' ,. . •. c. ; ; ; :. 17't F Fr.i .• :: - -- :".•',... " . L -; - :. , - ... ,`.4.'; ; ; ,..:4 i ' = .1' I . - ',.--,—,-1,--r, z .. • . - .', ' ' ' : _L.".:.'. : •, :-1 i I F.11i7: 1' i . I 4: I ••• ; t- : :....'-.....:.: — — - - i H I i• i i i ■ ', :"..., it---' Ci, •. ; ; ; 1 1:. L t, r, 7. ' "; . , ' :. .' ' ', - 4 7' ' '' ' '. ''.4'. I' ,:$''' .• . f . — - . " - - il f....i .4 ,-1 Ti :1 .,; .,,1,1 • t T t i . .;, ; ... ; .7.. : . ; ; ' ', ':. '...:, 1 .,I-c; ; L 1.....„ ,..„.,,,... . ; ..:.iz i i. ;-..!, T. t ,T, ,I. ;T, ..1, ... . ,: .... ,. . ... . .- ; . .. ..;... : •„ Afi. ..+ 1—fiy :• ty h 1, ! .. C::: ... 6, •!;11.,T ? A X ::. 1, . t t 4 7 1 i,; 7 ', . ": " ' •.,..,..-r.....4-R-..,...C......4...t4-..;--2:-,ii--,-t.--L''t 1 : : 11 t".4-1'' ;I: ' 1 .!? : Zi ' '2.; : . . - ... . '- .... 2 '7:: 7 f. q 1•••t ,,.■, 1.. t. 4 ': 4 . 1 Z; f X •7414111 1 ! : .1 .“ ; '1 r lt, :. -. -.. — . , , , : :: •: : :. ..: ati; a a ;.:..4.,.. ... :•.; ,,. It • '-11 ',' r 7:1-1-4' ,T; ; r i ' r I ; r:7 ; : i z a a . - ;: ,.: : , :.:a ; 4 : 1.. ; '-' 1, i 7 -:,-1-11 : 1 ,t !..-1-'..z: l' ; 1 t 1 .1.: 7 C 4 . 4 ; ‘"• - — :.:4 I ', '' 7 t U220 2,2014 4'. " ..: .' ' ?. - I" "il A; 4 : I 11. .II ' • , •: ...--5--.ti•-: i: .: t ,: --;4 I i-i; ri 1 1 t,lt : .... ::. ; 7: ,,. . C e.',41- - —4 •• / • ... `,I.., : ','. . .":": ": .. . . . .. 4 , .. ,4; I , • ,' , , ,. ; i ± ti....t.t4t1 &.4 ,. . • :, , .. `... ... : ; • ; ...,.. '17 1. ! ! 7. '2: t J 41' c,4,' ; .: 7 ' ''' '!-..• .-. ''' - ;' :'; ': ',: "./: IjIRTC 't -rt,“ ,•; " il.' . . • i tlF" 1 t J 11 i 1 'f. --' • ?; f ,.2-'-'DI ''.-4,..z.. --...- 44--..--4-i; 't't-t-i;. f: f;:t:1-i.:t t-i 1.-t.i..1-1---::•-t".:'1 I . . . .• 1' II. jillt ' ' 7 ,; ::::::. •!. .. !. •• i'.-;q:i'''"1"." : t; :', F: 1: .; '1, ;; : :' '. ° - : :- •'. 7 7. : > 0 :-I t = i.. /17:11T r i ;-. ;Ai ; ;jc...4•.:‘.,:- : .:. '.-: -:-. ; ; f:c .; : -:....; °um@ 4... t..-.,c...4; •;',.-11L.,,,I., ._.L.4.- :: v. IPITilift --t- , ,,,.,4 ,.,--t..4,.... °MO I ,r,,,L.1111/.;41 i 1 T./....4"•:•.•"; ,.,t g t' 1..(..„.,:::A:; 4 . 4- ?•1-i,-4:;:,; 1 T. :4 t t ,!, 7.,-%-,,:"Its,. t ..•.1,;,-, , . ,r,., r,•: .,....':. i ,. ,,, . 1 tl - E,4.,. „iu ii■11 aF0Ift :.i, ,, , oz n _F-- -..,.f. J, 1 : . t — -ii.triL..,t - ,,l,irs ,,,. T. 1!i, ,Id, • -dr. ! ! ; f .11y...1! ,..tg, , 4' : CV.7 4-1 44• 4 4 ; ,. m t:.., r.,44., i..:..0.. _ 4 4.,-ti.-2.. :4.-.:-..N;.:,g....--I ., :. - .. . . . :_,,,,: . - , 0Y0 i r . -:. •:. • . , .. ••. . 0'=0 =MAW NAME • 003 ..1 P >20 ,- •A 0 0 l) •.I _.. G . . . , > CI • . : • . -C . f -.---=— - SO P.Z4 II • --..EEEAA:;-:---2-Z-:--------------------------------.) - -----_____ ----------EEEEEEESOESESE.5.-------------------------------------A-5. .. -•- - ...- • ---•-- - - -i-:,-5--,: _ ,.. - ,-----• - 1 r .,1.1-----1 N.N.N.V.WW, _141204.X•VS\Nitt/,,,i;44`..k, .■ , i ... , ,,,,. _....„_,_ /' -.•. ...... ., . Ai :s.` .......'s.' ktifilit •t I- . . ........... ..,-. ....... . . - ,.......ctil ■ ie.,' .' Mil /41S, .,,„/ •••■ Stk 4 Cik, ■ ,c2:,_,/. ,,, _— N.N.EiliAk W. 4, /et 11 I 1 I' •A I ■ S ; ' I41.?I I •44-- .. 1 II-.-- 1111111111 ‘' 'f NS,'•! *••.4:I '''' • 1.•!:/' '%I .•"4. . .I X-• Vil 1 1 •i I . ,,. i •- N :' 1 4 4 I i- Hitt: . • . ,› t:At , I ' sh 4. i 1 . , :1 ••••., II. .__ • , ..1 . .•- • rtit . , ,. ■ .A,,,, '•:. :''I +g k g c-D , 1 ':--- ' '1 .. ...- ,' .• . • . '• .• " •1 a . , . „ , •z., . . ,..,,,,,,,,i,N,•,,,„„.... .. . • , _ ,_ to.44...:40 Mir • • • • k' I 1 "••.-I V: .°W NC ••***, "• ., '. ' ."1 — .41■... SI i S4'44/54"4111C11•■ " I E;, 4•11,4 iil Oa 2614 ' • 1 ,..1[= • •.„• .. 1 •• III '•`: No S....;:.0.0:0444 • • MI .1 ?••."•ig i4JVCV ' 4•••A • s.4 a 2,t him I i 1.0'ON-'1**0. -- _,,a—Are.— ,ss , , It, 111 ;,, ..,.,....„,,, , —1 , - : koot, , ,N- A 1 li,i 4 1.9 26 4V4:40".. C 1111 01 1 *14 •4* I 1 14, fa • 1 I:::k:Sezift,? .. -„- Akr\\17:6j-,‘,.. \W‘ ‘"N, '4"if:If;• I .44:44:45i"l• ,_•■404 tr.,: 9% I 1 i litot4,..-A? •4$t egifft iAV; • i2 04 14,11;*4 t 144 lt,„'4 I 14\A--Ns __ \N I b■• ' ,.•N 1111-011111111rt44. r ,,_.s.,,, .., xv.,\\,N,NN, Ni5,, 's,,,N,,,.‘„NN1,),.\\,- '',,:•,.. ,,,,,,N,N, '14,0,4440; i --_, _.................. .,_ _ ..(,„, 1 ,„,__ a -- ___ __, • _ ....... 1 - , 'Is ---,-----"----4----t.:— - - 1141PROMPAVEIY1 ''•'------••• I ..... , --... , \ ( \• • ' • I 1 i * 3 n 0 Z2uJ -0 Onll 1E33 0 . I I ri .1 t I i Olg 1 : itlii 11 i iiiiiF 11 1 viiiii f! How iillip. illsir . • ti,., ,i ! la/ q c- / iii0/11r" 2 Ili $11 2 Iiiii2 !hill go! i i o fn 0 0 3] h i-Ti. wigili 1 - iglii ,. , / 0 iialf;' iiall; Ilia/4 —1 ; 4•11 i 40.'i 4'1••1 - ill , 1 IA 5 .;. ,_ . .,.5.- w C. laiKEN AvE 8r 7 :r - i 1 ozn-•1 I 1 as4R--1 f a la r-•1 Li E 11:i E ie.; S i3.1 i e 11 , 801 > ; • B ' .' t ,I .,* a r. NV Mil r ? i ,;;;;i1 1 , :;;;:.,01 2:i 1 i ..,..;I k • , t 2 rile el r ' 2 illt q 4 • 4 !gum • 1 i i 11 A or gli.:UCFALO 1 AVE ,,. 1 i ill ° iii 11 i I 111,..,....41.11111.11.0,1 JI i . A-2 1 t 1. im•••• 1 '' 0°0 Q i 3 i li!pi II% pi 1 ip g i a 1 1 ; > • in . , .. . , i. .••••• g#:- -. 1 ki ii:. lie.s I A-1 3 i --4--- > .1. i I /I ' z il li ; 1 g A k..=.4.==._ A . • i 'as 90 tl , II w 1 x 'Y r c7 2 -1 - Iii d LI1 zo g rn:-° ci d4"7.1riel i \ A 8 - E i 8 I:. { 1 M I I I I I ! } ! " fl I 11111 pig E' i i It 1 il 1] ; 4; Sgt Co s� j ° D co V` 1 . 1. €r, m @ { ( [ r C d j 5,,5 r • i ft f(![ . m 1} F I9 f 1 pI ! 1 ® If # 011 t iD 1f r F s ,v 0111 m fra if 1 Z I ! C { # 1 tic I 4I m i i °` }, I Y I 1 1 1 9 m ■ ■I ■I ■ ■ ■I .� I i 0 i 0) isr 11 ti 1111111 t'i'tILuptiu '1 11 Ii i11 I / ' Iilt/ f 0:� I1 ; 1 (i i UUh, i1 Ii o e t D00 • •■ •. •■ I _ 0 ii . Ouol T. I f E ! B 1 1 } ODOR ;; E� fF�l o « I i Oro arm' it1t# it .1 Q K>Wc og It { i i III f -z 4 a, pzra » ii 1 iii I f l' , i °o D ■ • ■ . •I b arn r m • Ili • • ■jE r Y y ;_ D s z a LO 1i IP le . 1 I 1 fir..941iV liffittti6fiqa 1 JilAr.1 IN8EW,i'22i'i-“1,1 igraiqis 1 -.' ifi OP ..... 1),00 .',,cn .- :-.1 IN, = -- = , ill si . ! =1 0 !li c 0 .z ) 2 . • • " - 4ri. --I if_ i li if f ;t1 it" li it'll f ! Ili 22 -o q I 1 , 91 -ftli 0- ! 11.4 . ii • 2 , 11 - n I i I 5 1 ii 1 ! RI: $1) 11 H - 1 LI 1 1 if! 7 t gat I'l e ,i. ' 1 5t 9 I El 7.7 r i, , il i 11:-) ; : *1 ik, : :el tl ,,,,, I 5 d 0 , - ) 14 muli:10-1' 1 J : i i 0 ; k 1 cu e .,?, 5 V A■ E hisy t6 20'. II i. I i II E 0. ..i. d 0 ii ' p i; 11 - 9. - , °'i v, Z ra ID ''' " ill Ili ' Imolai ' ;1;1;41111 leligItairdgil g inil : Iii-iii■ '•1 . 1 , 1 t I 1 2 i Al 61q1; 2,t-- ..' ■ a Nil 1:! !1 0:.:1; 8 a i i I iiiii allifil V I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I ., . . . . 1 1 Igikli 3! . j Po.; i 11 470 i ;i • 1 0 > —{ Na 1 n 0 4. di (1) (0 Z20 t > C 0011 69 8 • a. 'cm 0 2 •%+ b Oom w 1... ,k4 -13 iii-D OVI ji 1 Sli' Cr„7 ni Z oro ar 0 ipc0 og 1= 0-to lz zro >> Og3 21 .2c, >.< OD 0 0 0 rn r > z oc 80 1-,d 0 • z -h.) ill ig IiirpA 0 11'5.' ' •ii-41t-piir-virile-,. a a'''- P — dr-.1.14-0-1..-- 4 il 1'-4 • 41 . 1 t" 1-1,• esio : .mar, •a .;j A A i g i i'at 0.Th r lil i, lt:1, ,„ - '411k. .ilif . ir gig , .. WO ir ii 1-i FR it . 1" f: 1 € a la = o a 9 EL- - If.µ ' ti 11 il ri' I 1'. . .-IP- lj . . ' � I L , t - " I E E E E G m I l 4 ,_air,ow , "ax rn as at o e 4 fir , '., 4,,:i. 1.:::, "ji...,,':,-' : - - . : '111F0 '. ifi.� �±' 'l/ y V r' OA ' I i s4 ii �7 m Ili z S s 6[ f n L Buffalo Avenue i E 1 e . i ; m i i 0'4 ail .c f ® c.® b O • • ® • • • • . O • • ••• • • • # 0�� © f � m IQ 1 11 f I # ' if 1 r : i ; l I f t I } ; I � f � ; I ` 1 ; f / 1 � � � i � f i l j- r i i i j ! i f 1 i } F { t 1 } i i ! f { ` i i 1 4 j f ( j ,- ; t i l l � { i t i i Ow i ' � �' i i �x i j it i Im1 - . " s . . , f • i i I i 1 1 11 i i i 1 l i i 7 . i T i i i 1 i i i i i l i i i i if i l i 1 i i f 1 1 i I e� `]. c 11l./` . . 1 1 . t .. r 4 £ i i y f' 1:e•0 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 44Nw w.•�.. -. J !~. MIN �.+-..�. r. :r--rte" r Imes=REALTY DE„EL EnXirons -a: _ 601 , '_: A _._ _ - = MINA rwa OWL R 1010CU waau.G v N — Richmond Place 51r16 L 111"nr'"Wrz, 14.,. drzrazirk . — — yr� ,r7i I I e. v .4 ...M.Kr= ..rye.. -. *not Et........----...- . fiEE d m ! -^ 1 x 2 t'. �!—I >. ew.... al►i� .41....1116.111111 -- , , l �' .► ._ 4 i � Z ;� I\sir, rr o a ., q o Fi +7t . is , g i lTr - � i R F fat r= 0 4 a M ;I y 0 p_o! I m ii 0_ .cto l! , g 9 ii r a CO ONA I lit' t� 1 1 Mg�i ,L tf ,t f . 1 i .I1 � f�= ' g gigs\' I o E E E l m - �.� O> to '-` '�.-�., ► " as osxe ,-.7-44,!°=. �! m g ��... s r ! 'iii ' .,:is I 0/ - mot` 1 !PROPEr/ '' i 3 m i Z$ g ' d Buffalo Avenue I B a m . d m r1), .11.0ENEE9 ■.i sm � o ® 0eo • 0oe ® 0oeoe •1 OOOW 0000iS i 118 r r I [ s n r i I i i i i t i i 1 ■ I I I I I i i { f = I 1 3 i t i i l i i t i I f i • I i m 1K j € l r lc i i ! ; t r p i i r f r i r 7 ( + i . j , i 1 j i r r f I r r f r 1 1 s i I 1 I � o i [ t ! t f f f 1 1 i i i f l / 9 4 4 7 ( ( $ IS i ! k t 4 Iit E F i t t i i@ k i 6 E i i i i § i i i i i i i / E t ( s a c ( f a l 6 4 F L 1 1 t q� i 's [ k n 6 4 5IS 9 i@ ° • c < i i ■ ■ s + s s . p x S 11 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN a,..u.co.nm�o.>w co c. "'''°" mEsti � 0Environs': :r- O L L -i.' MAIESnc REALTY DEVELOPMENT _. w _._ n _ �,. — �' r`�--` d 1 �nx 'a�wc�141 t RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAIEsnc CENTE -.1.4"---- W.49KM VNK DPoYE,HNICHJ CU!.ugMOI,G 'ter` Richmond Place --......,,.......z.., 0 0,1 C3 :,, ,,,\: :::::::::..ealieggf2_,NorJAT -, __ ..•••••::._....itto 11 i - 02'1,—. . . IIIIIMIEVIIIIIIIM I ! A • 7., k....,... ..--• C 'Cl. 14 i Fill q ' ,1 i I VII i (Z10 mt israti 1 i' I fig .i I i if 111 i 1 :, fo MIME .%1 IIIMIE 1 iR I MIIIIII cx,1 i MIME t. I 1! 1 IMO. MERE -0 "0 a : .1 41 A E.MIMEN iiCIMEN o ri INIMM Lf) 0 11 w •J IONMENNE 0_ , NEMB CO is. 1 g ' F i 1111/M.11 1. 7 11•111111 c El__. 1 • lt, MEM. D ,\,4 MEM. co .1•..s., Ke, If MEM. U ;1 MEIME V. 1 k- I k\ It l} ••N• iL....,, , .,ply j., REIM IMMO k ];-.rqi ilive4 71 : -,Ii ts i,'AO i 44, • .1.'.;.-P- , PI 2L. I! , ....„....1.,r _ .. OWi. il 1 [ t: ' : ',:,(-",',/-, ,, • i , "m . ;14 il. Lim ' . ,Til I i 11 I 1 111:.: laji '' a I II lc_j_____1:•.:..: INIIIII; :.. .„„,.., —_ glillIgl,igM11:15reo F98§22•,,,,,,..,:e&A**:::;:::::;:pF, ,T".1.■nul'n7: , —;iiestak,L . isore;;;=:;:i.i, _ 0 WO is?.:– „,, –— ---..--0.==-•-• - ■•• jimminsiz-,,,....,- cr• Buffalo Avenue SELLEEE/ IfIll I I” P3I1 i MU ig I i `Ji liftfli 1 ii : i q I li li 11 li 11 11111 g E gid-•- ig i 6 . ,. g g ig 1 1.• €1 I li li li li ii gi 3 ,,i 1 ti i .1 Nn2:: i 1 i t !"tEi 1 •E i iT I 5 1 i i i 1 i WilfiN I 1 El - 1 1 1 1 I I t • 1 411;i1 1 i I'll . . i 01 zi■N I I II :VI I 1 : 0 1) II•--- HYDROZONE MAP•WATER USE CALCS c...co.rr soNs-pjcxx:0 t' ....... 1.2.:ET:-r--4:•:r..--Tri-.":': 1 7 6 I MAJESTIC;FAIT(DEVELOP/ANT 2.... NI,.•ftwo.111...*00-3., ft LtrN,Pral.= I.I,lif i• RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAJESTIC CENTE .......INN so-um _ - NISSION P/MN OWL FLANGIO CUCAMONGA CA - f7 s V4 ' P112 r , •e � �'p all l J ST I ' 1 ,. r qt.. z _ f r-_t s £� 1 +'t )` + .r .„ . „,..., ,:,,,,,,,,,,,R.,1,,,,,,,,,,, ,... „ , . ..i ,1, A.r 4.x ;h. • �`� Y m 3 °ham . k L yf'•k XB x .,'a4 E tt, e is °^' 1::,..itft.*4,,,,,4,4''',. 4, 1:.:4:•:::0' •-•H,V-,::- .",,r, ,' P . -'..' * ..11:,:i4s!„.,, . . ., :.. :„.. 4 .........: . . ....... . ‘ ,. • .. . . .. ....., :.„,,,..,,,,,. . .., ,.,...:. ....,...„,„„:„:„..„,.,..,„:„...„... . . f/ , ��¢e 2;;,„"4.:,...,.::� :9n � '� YF4 gad' � " P113 R� -.. . r l �qo as % b . \ „ .: ,, I �. 1 '!„.,11.,...,::::....,;.:::::,..,:ii0;til'''41 .''',1:':',fl'''.':7'i:'' ' . i'.1:,;ii;;;''!;',',..!!1'''S':::.::::11-: ?. \ 4 P .aA H Tf v� Y ,. ,a �` b , " ::'": . :,, ,,,,, ,, , , ;,,,,:::„:?;:,,,,:'.4:,-,...:..* � at .:Iili i:;,,,,,,. , L,.s.'.i.?..:.Sa ,51.1:,,',,,, �H+ 0 0 P114 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r4 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ja AGENDA c `,oNGt AUGUST 5, 2014 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California Is Ir CALLTo ORbER-; >; ACTION Roll Call Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger X Alternates: Ray Wimberly Frances Howdyshell_ Lou Munoz I : II =:PROJECT REVIEW.ITEMS"` The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW A. Approved. DRC2014-00127- COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - Site plan and architectural review of a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related cases: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning • Map Amendment DRC2014-00126. pc 4 /bin pi 1of2 EXHIBIT B A • P115 .1S DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA Lit AUGUST 5, 2014 UCAMONGA B. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2013-00789 - ROUTE 66 B. Approved with a IECA - A request to preserve the Historic Cucamonga Service Station request for a rendering including restoring the front building (Phase 1)and to reconstruct the rear of the station prior to the 2,391 square foot service garage (Phase 2)within the Foothill Boulevard Planning Commission Specialty Commercial (SC) District, located at 9670 Foothill Boulevard - Meeting if possible. APN: 0208-153-05. ( f, ,. IIL .."PUBLIC COMMENTS Ail;1 '::','::.'*::=; ',. None. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. . 4 .m . W.:, ADOURNMENTx , °=',T!..:":::;.:','..-7.'e,:::, 7:41 p.m. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 2 of 2 • • P116 - RESOLUTION NO. 14-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK(IP) TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A 139,983 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON A 6.6-ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED SOUTH OF MISSION PARK DRIVE BETWEEN RICHMOND PLACE AND BUFFALO AVENUE WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APNS: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, AND 09. A. Recitals. 1. Commerce Construction Co., LP filed an application for the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September, 2014 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 6.6 acres of land, basically square in shape and located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (IP); b. The property to the east is developed with industrial buildings within the Industrial Park(IP) Development District;to the west is a large warehouse distribution building that is partially in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District and partially within the General Industrial (GI) Development District; to the north are industrial buildings within the General Industrial (GI) Development District; and, to the south, are commercial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; c. The amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. With approval of this General Plan Amendment and the related EXHIBIT B • • P117 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-43 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 2 Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-00126)the General Plan and Zoning Map will have the same land use designation; d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element in that the General Industrial (GI) land use designation permits a wide range of industrial activities that include manufacturing and wholesale supply; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties.The properties to the north, east and west are developed with similar uses and will not be negatively impacted by the approval of this General Plan Amendment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area. The subject site is accessed by public streets which are designed to accommodate industrial truck traffic and there are other similarly sized buildings in the surrounding area used for wholesale, storage, and distribution. b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. This General Plan Amendment will not negatively impact the environment or the surrounding uses in that the Zoning Map Amendment from Industrial Park(IP)to General Industrial (GI)will not change the size of building permitted on the site, only the use(s) of the building. In the immediate vicinity of the proposed land use change there are other similarly sized buildings and land that is designated General Industrial,thereby providing logical land use compatibility. c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan in that the project site is surrounded by similar industrial uses to the north, east and west and will be compatible with those uses in terms of size, vehicle traffic and design. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record • • P118 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-43 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 3 before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of the project site from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) related to the construction of a 139,983 industrial building located on south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue - APN: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. 2) Approval is contingent on the approval by the City Council of Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-00126) to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Park (GP). 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) Prior to the approval of a rough grading plan the applicant shall perform a DSF (Delhi sands flower-loving fly) survey to determine whether the project may affect the DSF and the results shall be provided to the Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office for review. All mitigation measures recommended by the biologist and/or Department of Fish and Wildlife Service shall be fulfilled prior to permit issuance. • P119 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: "Pre7.A - effrey (. Bloom, DCM I, Jeffrey A. Bloom, Deputy City Manager Economic & Community Development of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL,MUNOZ,OAXACA,WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • P12O RESOLUTION NO. 14-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126,A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE ZONING MAP TO CHANGE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A 139,983 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON A 6.6-ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED SOUTI I OF s - ' - • - -• - PLACE AND BUFFALO AVENUE WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APNS: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 AND 09. A. Recitals. 1. Commerce Construction Co., LP filed an application for the approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Zoning Map Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2014 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found,determined,and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 6.6 acres of land, basically square in shape and located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (IP); b. The property to the east is developed with industrial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; to the west is a large warehouse distribution building that is partially in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District and partially within the General Industrial (GI) Development District;to the north are industrial buildings within the General Industrial(GI)Development District; and, to the south, are commercial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; c. The amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. With approval of the related General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00012) the Zoning Map and General Plan will have the same land use designation. • • P121 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-44 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 2 d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element in that the General Industrial (GI) land use designation permits a wide range of industrial activities that include manufacturing and wholesale supply; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent The properties to the north, east and west are developed with similar uses and will not be negatively impacted with the Zoning Map Amendment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission herby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter,the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the • • P122 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-44 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 3 mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon -- the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the application subject to each and every condition set forth. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a Zoning Map Amendment to change the land use designation of the project site from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) related to the construction of a 139,983 square foot industrial building located on south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue -APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. 2) Approval is contingent on the approval by the City Council of General Plan Amendment(DRC2014-00012) to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Park (GP). 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) Prior to the approval of a rough grading plan the applicant shall perform a DSF (Delhi sands flower-loving fly) survey to determine whether the project may affect the DSF and the results shall be provided to the Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office for review. All mitigation measures recommended by the biologist and/or Department of Fish and Wildlife Service shall be fulfilled prior to permit issuance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • • P123 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-44- ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 4 BY: 111114.• Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman K ATTEST: red p. B m, DCM I, Jeffrey A. Bloom Deputy City Manager Economic& Community Development of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • • • P124 RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127,A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 139,983 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON A 6.6-ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED SOUTH OF MISSION PARK DRIVE BETWEEN RICHMOND PLACE AND BUFFALO AVENUE WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL DARK—(lo-Pi n,-- _o-EW—PAAENT n. — ISTR C AND—AR N SUPPORT THEREOF—APNS: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, AND 09. A. Recitals. 1. Commerce Construction Co., LP filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2014-00127 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2014 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; and b. The property is comprised of four (4) parcels with a combined area of 6.6 acres; and c. The property is vacant and has been regularly cleared of brush; and d. To the east are industrial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; to the west is a large warehouse distribution building that is partially in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District and partially within the General Industrial (GI) Development District;to the north are industrial buildings within the General Industrial (GI) Development District; and, to the south, are commercial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; and e. The applicant proposes to develop a 139,983 square foot industrial building along with 104 passenger vehicle parking spaces and 15 trailer parking spaces; and • • P125 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 2 f. The proposed Floor Area Ratio (FAR)for the proposed building is 49 percent,just below the probable FAR of 50 percent; and g. The application contemplates "wholesale, storage, and distribution" uses for the proposed site. As defined in Section 17.32.020 of the Development Code, all categories of wholesale, storage, and distribution uses are permitted in the General Industrial (GI) Development District whict_the_site_wil he in with_the_appravaLoLthe related_Genemt_PlariAmendmmt (DRC2014-00012) and Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-00126). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project will be in accord with the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which it is located with the approval of the related General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00012) and Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-00126) to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Park (GP). b. That the proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. In that the use of the proposed 139,983 square foot industrial building will be permitted within the General Industrial (GI) Development District with the approval of the related General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI). Additionally, there are industrial uses to the north, east and west of the site. c. The proposed development will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code with the related change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI). The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City including building and parking setbacks; average landscape depth; floor area ratio; parking; dock and storage area screening, landscape coverage, site planning, and architecture. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as all activities will take place within an enclosed building and will comply with all related local, State and Federal requirements. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: • a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative P126 PLANNING COMMISSION NO. 14-45 • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 3 Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and4i)_that_based_nn the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission adopts the Mitigated • Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction of a 139,983 square foot industrial building located on south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09. 2) Approval is contingent on the approval by the City Council of General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00012) and Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-00126)to change the land use designation from Industrial Park (IP) to General Park (GP). 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 5) The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order • P127 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 4 to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. The maximum height of light standards, including the base, measured from the finished surface is 25 feet. 6) New walls, including retaining walls, shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete_withdesign_elements_incorporated_to_match_the_buildings 7) All wrought iron'fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a similarly dark color. Sliding gates shall include a solid metal backing and be constructed to withstand the areas high winds. 8) The stone veneer shall be applied with a mortared (grouted) finish around each individual stone. 9) Provide decorative paving at all vehicle entrances behind public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. The final design of the enhanced pavement including, but not limited to, concrete color and geometric dimensions, shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval. 10) All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices, etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 11) All Double Detector Checks(DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations generally in front of, and along,the screen walls that enclose the dock areas and not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corners of each building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks(DDC)and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the buildings. 12) The employee lunch areas shall have overhead trellises with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. 13) All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent building wall. 14) Outdoor furniture shall be provided in the outdoor employee eating areas. All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc.) shall be permanent, uniform, and of durable materials. PLANNING COMMISSIO•ESOLUTION NO. 14-45 • P128 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 5 15) All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. 16) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 thro.ugh_August_31.),_a_precnnstruction_nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with CDFW protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. Engineering Services Department 1) Show private storm drains consistently on Site, Grading, and Concept Utility plans. 2) Buffalo Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Secondary" improvements, including: a) Protect the existing curb and gutter and curvilinear sidewalk as required. b) Provide street trees and drive approaches per City Standards as required. c) Protect the existing street lights or provide as required. d) Protect or repair existing traffic striping, signage and traffic signal equipment, as required. 3) Richmond Place frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a) Protect the existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repair as required. b) Provide street trees and drive approaches as required. c) Protect the existing street lights or provide as required. d) Protect or repair the existing traffic signing and signage as required. • • P129 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 6 4) Mission Park Drive to be improved to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a) Protect the existing curb and gutter and sidewalk. b)—Provide-street-trees. c) Protect the existing street lights or provide along Mission Drive frontage as required. 5) Verify existing access ramps at the southeast corner of Buffalo Avenue and Mission Park Drive and at the southwest corner of Richmond Place and Mission Park Drive for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Std. 102.• Otherwise, reconstruct access ramps to current City Std. 100-B and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc. or approved equal. 6) The development is within the Industrial Area Assessment District AD 82-1 and therefore no drainage fees shall be required. 7) Revise Drawing Number 1873-D Sheet 3 to show private storm drain connection. Building and Safety Services Department– Grading Special Conditions 1) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 2) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to the Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 3) Verify existing access ramps at the southeast corner of Buffalo Avenue and Mission Park Drive and at the southwest corner of Richmond Place and Mission Park Drive for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Std. 102. Otherwise, reconstruct access ramps to current City Std. 100-B and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc. or approved equal. • • P13O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 7 Water Quality Management Plan 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded-prior-to-the-issuance-of-a-Grading-Permit. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) The project shall implement Mitigation Measures MM AQ-1 and MM AQ-2 for the reduction of VOC emissions below SCAQMD Regional Threshold levels as follows: • Only "Zero-Volatile Organic Compounds" paints (no more than 150 gram/liter of VOC) and/or High Pressure Low Volume (HPLV) applications consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113 shall be used. • During construction activity, all construction equipment(equal to or greater than 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 Certified or better. Additionally, during grading activity, total horsepower-hours per day for all equipment shall not exceed 18,088 horsepower-hours per day and the maximum disturbance (actively graded) area shall not exceed 5 acres per day. 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 4) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. • • P131 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 8 5) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 6) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: •—Reestablish ground--cover-ors-the-construction-site-through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 7) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 8) Chemical soil-stabilizers(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 9) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 10) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. • • P132 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 9 Lonq Term Emissions 11) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 12) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 13) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 14) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 15) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 16) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 17) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 18) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 19) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 20) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 21) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Biological Resources 1) A'30-day pre-construction burrowing owl survey is required prior to approval of a rough Grading Permit. 2) Prior to approval of a rough grading plan the applicant shall perform a DSF (Delhi sands flower-loving fly) survey to determine whether the project may affect the DSF and the results shall be provided to the Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office. for review. All mitigation measures recommended by the biologist and/or Department of Fish and Wildlife Service shall be fulfilled prior to permit issuance. • • P133 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 10 • Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of archaeolist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay,to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the • • P134 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 11 discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil- stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. • • P135 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 12 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. 8) Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 9) Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, use daylight as an integral part of the lighting systems in buildings. 10) Install light-colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. 11) Install energy-efficient heating and cooling systems, appliances and equipment and control systems. 12) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 13) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • • P136 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 13 • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 14) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: , • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 15) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. • • P137 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 14 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control-dust-in-orderto-prevent sediment-from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by PBLA Engineering (May, 20, 2014) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities 7) Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained(i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise • 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. • • P138 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 15 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building--Official-wwit in-24-hours hewevcr, if noisc Icvcls cxcccd the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter screen wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips(counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Transportation/Traffic 1) Implement the site access improvement outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the project (Urban Crossroads, April 2014) and described in Section 1.6.1 (Site Access Improvements) and on Exhibit 1 - 3 (On-Site Access and Circulation Recommendations) of the analysis. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: J y A. oom DCM I, Jeffrey A. Bloom, Deputy City Manager Economic & Community Development of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at • • P139 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP September 24, 2014 Page 16 a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES;---CS I _ 0 -. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • • P140 Conditions of Approval •.A J RUNCRO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 P o ectType: Design Review Ctt]A Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 2. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Manager prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 3. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on- and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Mitigated Negative Declaration -$ 2,206.25 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 • • P141 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CE0A2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 6 Copies_of—the signet:* - • ••• • •• • - • •• • - -1 - tandarri (',nnrlitinn�' and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 9. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 10. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 11. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 12. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 13. Landscaping and •irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 14. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees -24-inch box or larger. 15. Within parking tots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 16. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 17. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/212014 Page 2 of 29 P142 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 1—Mission-Park—Drive—to—be—irnpruved to be—in—accordance witn City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk. b. Provide street trees. c. Protect existing street lights or provide along Mission Drive frontage, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping and signage, as required. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Buffalo Avenue Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited.to: Mission Park Drive Street Lights Street Trees 4. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 5. The development is within the Industrial Area Assessment District AD 82-1 and therefore no drainage fees shall be required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. • Printed:9122014 1ww.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 29 • • P143 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 8111- _ - ,... , legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name- Buffalo Avenue Botanical Name-Pinus canariensis Common Name-Canary Island Pine Min. Grow Space- 7' Spacing -35' O.C. Size- 15 Gallon • Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 9. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be' filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 12. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 4 of 29 • • P144 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, 0RC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 13-Improvement-Plans-and C• - -. - a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. • 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 16. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. Printed:912/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 29 • • P145 . Project#: 0RC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 17. Richmond—Place—frontage—improvements—to—be in accordance with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repair, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic signing and signage, as required. 18. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Richmond Place Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 20. Street Name- Richmond Place Botanical Name-Brachychiton populneus Common Name- Bottle Tree Min. Grow Space-6' • Spacing -35' O.C. Size- 15 gallon 21. Street Name- Mission Park•Drive Botanical Name-Magnolia grandiflora"St. Mary" •Common Name- NCN Min. Grow Space-3' Spacing -20'O.C. Size- 15 gallon . 22. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 0 of 29 • • P146 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 23. Revise Drawing Number 1873-D Sheet 3 to show private storm drain connection. 24. Buffalo Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Secondary" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and curvilinear sidewalk, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches per City Standards, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping, signage and traffic signal equipment, as required. e. Provide a signing and striping plan for Buffalo Avenue. 25. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. • E. Grading Section 1. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 3. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 4. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Buffalo Avenue, Richmond Place and Mission Park Drive) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 5. Planting in the infiltration basins shall meeting the requirements of the Water Quality Management Plan Technical Guidance Document and the required infiltration report shall include a reduction in the infiltration rate due to the proposed landscaping and river rock cobble. 6. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Printed:9/2/2014 wrw.CityofRC.us Page 7of29 • • P147 . Project#: DRC2014-00127 CE0A2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF • Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: • E. Grading Section 7 The—P - -• k - - • - •t 1- i-•-u ent—Plan has been deemed "Acceptable":_Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. • A. Planning Department 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 2. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Manager prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program . shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 3. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on- and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 2,206.25 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant • of his obligations under this condition. www.CityorRC.us Prints:9/2/2014 Page B or 29 • P148 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department F Copies of the sinned—: - • • _. .. . .. . . . . fl .. • • _ _ _ .- •_ . environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 9. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 10. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 11. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 12. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 13. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 14. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees-24-inch box or larger. 15. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 16. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 17. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. Printed:912/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 29 P149 . Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 1. M'- : - e - - •- -- - -- in–acco da nc—with–City lndustrial–Lecal=fmprovements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk. b. Provide street trees. c. Protect existing street lights or provide along Mission Drive frontage, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping and signage, as required. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Buffalo Avenue Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Mission Park Drive Street Lights Street Trees 4. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 5. The development is within the Industrial Area Assessment District AD 82-1 and therefore no drainage fees shall be required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. www.CityofRC.us Printed:912)2014 Page 10 of 29 • • • P150 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Enclineerinci Services Department 8—Instal street–trccs per City street–tree–design–guidelines and standards es fellows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name- Buffalo Avenue Botanical Name-Pinus canariensis Common Name-Canary Island Pine • Min. Grow Space-7' Spacing -35' O.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 9. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 12. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. • www.cityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 11 at 29 • • P151 Project#: 0RC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 13 Improvement Plans and Co strut-ton. a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 16. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. vn Printed:9/2/2011 Page 12 of 29 P152• Project#: 0RC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 • Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Ennineerina Services Department 17—Richmond—race frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repair, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches, as required. • c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic signing and signage, as required. 18. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Richmond Place Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 20. Street Name- Richmond Place Botanical Name- Brachychiton populneus Common Name- Bottle Tree Min. Grow Space-6' Spacing -35' O.C. Size- 15 gallon 21. Street Name- Mission Park Drive Botanical Name- Magnolia grandiflora"St. Mary" Common Name- NCN Min. Grow Space- 3' Spacing -20'O.C. Size- 15 gallon . 22. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 13 of 29 • • P153 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, 0RC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 23. Revise-Drawing Number 1873-0 Sheet 3 to show private storm drain connection. 24. Buffalo Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Secondary" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and curvilinear sidewalk, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches per City Standards, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping, signage and traffic signal equipment, as required. e. Provide a signing and striping plan for Buffalo Avenue. 25. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. E. Grading Section 1. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 3. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 4. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Buffalo Avenue, Richmond Place and Mission Park Drive) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 5. Planting in the infiltration basins shall meeting the requirements of the Water Quality Management Plan Technical Guidance Document and the required infiltration report shall include a reduction in the infiltration rate due to the proposed landscaping and river rock cobble. 6. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityoiRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 14 of 29 • • P154 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 7. Fite—P _ _. - : issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. A. Planning Department 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant , is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 2. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Manager prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 3. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on- and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Mitigated Negative Declaration - $2,206.25 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 15 al 29 • • • P155 . Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, 0RC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department •�. Copies—of— - '. • - - • •• e _ .. . _ . _ .. . _ -. - _.. - • Conditions, and ail environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 9. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 10. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the .development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 11. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 12. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 13. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 14. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees -24-inch box or larger. 15. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 16. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 17. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2010 Page 16 of 29 • • • P156 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, 0RC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Enaineerina Services Department . • • % .- • •- ' • •'-• tcte in aCCdrdd1R.e with City Industrial Local" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk. . b. Provide street trees. c. Protect existing street lights or provide along Mission Drive frontage, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping and signage, as required. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Buffalo Avenue Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Mission Park Drive Street Lights Street Trees 4. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 5. The development is within the Industrial Area Assessment District AD 82-1 and therefore no drainage fees shall be required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9 12/2014 Page 17 of 29 • • P157 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department - __ __. •_ _ _ __ •- '•• • '•- '•- _•• _ ••_ •- - ollow¢ The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name- Buffalo Avenue Botanical Name-Pinus canariensis Common Name-Canary Island Pine Min. Grow Space-7' Spacing - 35' O.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 9. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 12. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. www.CityofRC.us 912/2014 .CityofRC.us Page 18 of 29 P158 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CE0A2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 13. Improvement Plans and COnabuction. a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 16. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 19 of 29 P159 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940108-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department . - • _ - improvements—t^ ba�i.—asserdance—with City "Industrial Local" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repair, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic signing and signage, as required. 18. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Richmond Place Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 20.Street Name- Richmond Place Botanical Name-Brachychiton populneus Common Name- Bottle Tree Min. Grow Space-6' Spacing - 35' O.C. Size- 15 gallon 21. Street Name-Mission Park Drive • Botanical Name-Magnolia grandiflora"St. Mary" Common Name- NCN Min. Grow Space-3' Spacing -20' O.C. Size- 15 gallon . 22. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit,. the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 20 of 29 • • P160 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, 0RC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 . Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 23. Revise Drawing Number 1873-D Sheet 3 to show private storm drain connection. 24. Buffalo Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Secondary" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and curvilinear sidewalk, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches per City Standards, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping, signage and traffic signal equipment, as required. e. Provide a signing and striping plan for Buffalo Avenue. 25. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. E. Grading Section 1. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 3. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 4. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Buffalo Avenue, Richmond Place and Mission Park Drive) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 5. Planting in the infiltration basins shall meeting the requirements of the Water Quality Management Plan Technical Guidance Document and the required infiltration report shall include a reduction in the infiltration rate due to the proposed landscaping and river rock cobble. 6. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us 9/2/2014 w.CityofRC.us Page 21 of 29 • • P161 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section . issuance of a grading permit a final .project-specific Water Quality Management Plan •shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. A. Planning Department 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and • completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 2. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Manager prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 3. • Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on- and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Mitigated Negative Declaration-$2,206.25 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 22 of 29 • • P162 Project#: 0RC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 9. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 10. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 11. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 12. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 13. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 14. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees-24-inch box or larger. 15. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 16. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 17. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically fess than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. wnv.CityolRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 23 of 29 • • P163 . Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 1. M' 'a - •- - . - " ial Local" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk. b. Provide street trees. c. Protect existing street lights or provide along Mission Drive frontage, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping and signage, as required. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Buffalo Avenue • Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Mission Park Drive Street Lights Street Trees 4. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the fist Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 5. The development is within the Industrial Area Assessment District AD 82-1 and therefore no drainage fees shall be required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 24 of 29 • • P164 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, 0RC2014-00126, • LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Enctineerinq Services Department 8. Install sheet trees per City street tree design guidelines and stanaalds as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name- Buffalo Avenue Botanical Name-Pinus canariensis Common Name-Canary Island Pine Min. Grow Space- 7' Spacing - 35'O.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 9. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 12. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 25 of 29 • • P165 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA201400005, DRC201400012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Enclineerinsl Services Department 13. Improvcment liana and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits • required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 8 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 16. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. ew.w.CityolRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 26 of 29 • • P166 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA201400005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department . . - - . ..- . . improvements, including: • a. Protect existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repair, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic signing and signage, as required. 18. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Richmond Place Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 20. Street Name- Richmond Place Botanical Name-Brachychiton populneus Common Name-Bottle Tree Min. Grow Space-6' Spacing - 35'O.C. Size- 15 gallon 21. Street Name-Mission Park Drive Botanical Name-Magnolia grandiflora"St. Mary" Common Name-NCN Min. Grow Space-3' Spacing-20' O.C. Size- 15 gallon . 22. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, • structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 27 of 29 • • P167 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: -022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 23. Revise Drawing Number 1873-D Sheet 3 to show private storm drain connection. 24. Buffalo Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Secondary" improvements, including: a. Protect existing curb and gutter and curvilinear sidewalk, as required. b. Provide street trees and drive approaches per City Standards, as required. c. Protect existing street lights or provide, as required. d. Protect or repair existing traffic striping, signage and traffic signal equipment, as required. e. Provide a signing and striping plan for Buffalo Avenue. 25. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans: If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. E. Grading Section 1. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 3. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 4. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Buffalo Avenue, Richmond Place and Mission Park Drive) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 5. Planting in the infiltration basins shall meeting the requirements of the Water Quality Management Plan Technical Guidance Document and the required infiltration report shall include a reduction in the infiltration rate due to the proposed landscaping and river rock cobble. 6. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided • for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 28 of 29 • • P168 Project#: DRC2014-00127 CEQA2014-00005, DRC2014-00012, DRC2014-00126, LSPR2014-00018 Project Name: COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF Location: - 022940106-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Landscape Review, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 1. 1 he Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. • www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/2/2014 Page 29 of 29 P169 / � WTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L ._I THE MINUTES OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California Ii , A ' T , i , r- a , I Y : CLOD Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 PM Roll Call Chairman Wimberly X Vice Chairman Oaxaca X Munoz X Howdyshell X Fletcher X Additional Staff Present: Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Dominic Perez, Assistant Planner •• ;II h',. '.ANNOUNCEMENTS :-. I At their meeting of August 27, 2014, the Commission selected Commissioner Wimberly to serve as Chairman and Commissioner Oaxaca to serve as Vice Chairman. They will serve for a one year term on both the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning Commission which is reviewed annually per the Planning Commission Administrative Guidelines. Please welcome Chairman Wimberly and Vice Chairman Oaxaca to their new positions on the Commission and thank Commissioners Howdyshell and Fletcher for their prior leadership and service in this capacity. Chairman Wimberly announced that the workshop scheduled for this evening is canceled at the request of the applicant. Commissioner Munoz welcomed back Commissioner Fletcher. EXHIBIT C P170 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LAND PLANNING COMMISSION RANCHO MINUTES CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 2 Commissioner Fletcher thanked staff, the City Council and the Fire Department for the cards and flowers. :. t • ;. III ti: ., , PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS , . L.::: :V This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receWe testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. IV a' CONSENT CA iNDAR/HISTORIC,PRESERVATION ,COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION',,;h ,4 A. Approval of Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes dated August 13, 2014 B. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated August 27, 2014 C. Approval of Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes dated August 27, 2014 A. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1 (Howdyshell abstain)to adopt the minutes as presented for August 13, 2014. B. And C. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 5-0 to adopt the minutes as presented for August 27, 2014. I ,V PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING:COMMISSION , The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. D. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19550 — RANCHO HAVEN, LP — A request to subdivide a parcel of about 87,120 square feet(2.0 acres), that is currently developed with two (2) commercial buildings, into two (2) parcels of 54,014 square feet (1.24 acres) and P171 (0:84 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION RANCHO MINUTES UUCAMONOA SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 3 33,106 square feet (0.76 acres) in the Industrial Park (IP) District and Haven Avenue Overlay District(HAOD), located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Sixth Street. Related files: Conditional Use Permit CUP 99-53, Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-01193, and Minor Development Review DRC2010-00400. This action is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315—Minor Land Divisions;APN: 0209-262-20. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 27, 2014. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE TO AN UNSPECIFIED DATE. Chairman Wimberly noted the item was carried over from the August 27, 2014 meeting date. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell to continue the item to an unspecified date at the applicant's request. Carried 5-0, E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450 — SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION -A request to subdivide a 13.23-acre parcel to create 3 new parcels within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street - APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00565 — SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION - A request to develop a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI)District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street- APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. G. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2014-00250-SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION- A request to establish a Uniform Sign Program in connection with the proposed development of a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street - APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450. Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner, presented the report and PowerPoint presentation(copy on file). In response to Commissioner Howdyshell he pointed out where the possible rail spur could be placed in the future and noted that they would lose some parking but that the site has an overage of parking provided. P172 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION tt� AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 4 Carl Vanderhoek, representing Scheu Management Corp said staff did a great job and had no additional comment. Chairman Wimberly opened the public hearing and hearing and seeing none, closed the public hearing. Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Fletcher to Approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450, Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014- 00250 as presented. Carried 5-0. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 -COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC.-A request to change the land use designation from Industrial Park(IP)to General Industrial(GI)in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District- APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related Cases: Development Review DRC2014-0000127 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. -A request to modify the Zoning Map to change land use designation from Industrial Park(IP)to General Industrial (GI)in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related Cases: Development Review DRC2014-0000127 and General Plan Amendment DRC2014- 00012. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - Site plan and architectural review of a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related Cases: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- 00126. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, gave the report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted the buildings to the east and west are at least double the size of P173 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 'I AND PLANNING COMMISSION RANCHO MINUTES CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 5 this developer's request. He said staff received a letter from Fish and Wildlife with concerns regarding the Delhi Sand Flower Loving Fly and the related biological study for the project. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said provided the Commission agrees, a condition will be added to the mitigation measures of all three resolutions and will become part of the MMP. Jeff Bloom, DCM Economic and Community Development said Fish and Wildlife presented two possible remedies: either a back to back seasonal study or get an assessment from a biologist certified to perform Delhi Fly studies. Mr. Bloom said we recommend the applicant consult with US Fish and Wildlife and confirm this is taken care of suitably. He said adding the condition allows the project to move forward past the Planning Commission level and allows them time to address this fully before it reaches the City Council. Jim Robertson, Commerce Construction said they understand the condition and their biologist is investigating the situation. Chairman Wimberly emphasized the Commission recommendation and for it to be handled prior to the City Council hearing. He then opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said the project was well thought out and a reasonable solution has been proposed for the concern from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Commissioner Howdyshell said it is the highest and best use for the land and liked the renderings. Commissioner Munoz agreed and added that it is well designed and fits in with the surrounding development. Commissioner Fletcher said the applicant provided more than what we asked for, it provides a good transition that makes sense, it provides jobs, commerce and revenue. Chairman Wimberly felt all the main points had been covered; the developer has stepped up. Mr. Flower read the added condition into the record: Prior to approval of a rough grading plan the applicant shall perform a DSF(Delhi sands flower-loving fly) survey to determine whether the project may affect the DSF and the results shall be provided to the Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office for review. All mitigation measures recommended by the biologist and/or P174 .iqr HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CHO UCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 6 Department of Fish and Wildlife Service shall be fulfilled prior to permit issuance. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Munoz to Approve Design Review DRC2014-00127 and recommend approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 and General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. All three resolutions were amended with the added condition regarding the biological study for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly. Carried 5-0. K. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2014-00774-SSRB GROUP, INC.-A request to modify an approved Conditional Use Permit (DRC2012-00057)to increase the hours of operation in order to open earlier for an existing restaurant and bar(Sixty6 Sports Lounge) located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue within the Specialty Commercial (SC) Development District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Suite K1. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted that he prepared the staff report and it has been signed and submitted by Jeff Bloom, DCM Economic& Community Development. Mr. Van der Zwaag called Deputy Kovensky to explain the memo they prepared regarding the establishment. Deputy Kovensky, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, said she and her partner are part of the ACT(Alcohol Compliance Team) and noted their inspections occurred June 1, 2013 to the present day. She said she is providing updated information (copy on file) referencing many violations and calls for service to the location including a murder in the parking lot, bugs in the alcohol, noise, outside speakers, flashing lights, open doors,refusal to post ABC & Business licenses, not enough security guards on site, not using an ID scanner, holding a car show and serving alcohol without a Temporary Use Permit, and opening early without a permit during World Cup Soccer. She noted that there was an incident involving a murder and although the murder suspect was kicked out of the establishment, the Police were not called and then the murder occurred after that. She said there is an outstanding fee of$575 to the City for false alarm calls as well as an outstanding admission tax payment. She said all of these items were noted because the deputies are required to do so. Commissioner Munoz asked what type of response/tenor the deputies receive when they ask for compliance. He asked about the bugs in the alcohol. He asked if the business owner is aware of the outstanding fees. He asked how the Police determine if a call for service specifically relates to this business. P175 a HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION L� MINUTES RANCHO CucAMONOA SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 7 Deputy Kovensky said they asked three times for the ABC and Business License postings. She said they observe and document what they see. She said the fee issue was reported to her by Business Licenses and to her knowledge, the applicant is aware. She said the owners know what they should be doing as it is in their permits. She said fruit flies can get in the alcohol, ABC knows that, it is a common occurrence, but the counts for this business are above acceptable levels. She said the bartender should be diligently checking for them every day and they can be stopped with screw type tops or covers over the tops. She said the City charges a fee for false alarms which has not been paid. She said their call logs note the specific location. She said there is a variety of calls that pull our deputies away from other things in the city. Commissioner Howdyshell asked how many of these calls occur prior to the noon hour. Deputy Kovensky said she did not have those statistics but said probably not many; most would be after the noon hour. Commissioner Fletcher asked what is causing the false alarms and Sixty6 and the Koffee Klatch. Deputy Kovensky said she could not specify that;there could be a number of causes. She said drunks shaking doors, spiders in the motion sensors, etc. are possibilities. The Koffee Klatch had none before Sixty6 Sports Lounge opened. Chairman Wimberly invited the applicant to speak. Bobi Bedi, SSRB group said the building was empty for 7 years; the wind can cause the alarm to sound and they have done what they can. Because it is a historical building they cannot replace the doors. He said the murder did not occur in their lot, it was across from the Flame Broiler;the person was drunk and in his business for only 15 minutes and he got kicked out-he said the reason there was an arrest was because of their parking lot cameras. He said the second fight occurred after the car show. He said Koffee Klatch has a band louder than their speakers which are only 60 watts. He said he would buy dinner and drink for anyone to come and hear that it is not his speakers that are causing the noise. He said changing the doors would keep the flies out, but they can't change them or install airflow units over the doors either because they cannot attach anything to the building. He said they never have flies at their other locations. He said they have greatly reduced the number of fly bottle counts down to 6. He said they can only have one small sign. He said they cannot put anything on the walls. He said they are penalized because the building is historic. He said they keep the doors open because they do not want it to be like a nightclub;they want it to be more like a lounge. He said they have made mistakes because P176 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION h�C AND PLANNING COMMISSION RANCHO MINUTES CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 8 they have never had a business like this, but suggested that rather than slap their hands, help them out. He said nothing in their permits say the doors have to be closed. He said their permit says they need one guard for every 75 people. He said with the boxing matches they always have 3 or 4 security guards. He said with respect to the report of flashing lights; the lights do not flash, they change colors very slowly, it is almost unnoticeable. He said Koffee Klatch has doubled their business because of them. He said seven new tenants have come into the center since they opened. He said they will make changes that will work. He said he did not sponsor the car show and he did not provide alcohol in the lot. He said when they discovered it, they called. He said they did make the mistake of opening early for the World Cup. He said if they only have 6 DUI's then they are doing something right-he said their bartenders are really well trained. He said their plan does not state that they have to call the Police if they have someone that is intoxicated. We do not serve them anymore and walk them out. He said it is not mentioned when you do something right. He said with respect to the owed fees that he would pay them tomorrow. Sunil Sethi said the deputy has been there three times. He asked if she has seen any improvement with the flies and if they are going in the right direction. Chairman Wimberly said there could not be a dialogue between him and the deputy at this time. He said their question can be referenced to the staff and to work with them. Commissioner Munoz asked the purpose of the outside speakers and if other businesses have complained. Mr. Bedi stated they are only for games, they are not connected to their live music system. He said the other businesses have not complained even once. They(Wine Tailor&Koffee Klatch) both have live bands outside and they understand. Chairman Wimberly asked Mr. Bedi if he is onsite. Mr. Bedi said he and the partners are onsite all the time at all of their locations. Commissioner Fletcher asked the deputy if she has observed any progress. Deputy Kovensky said not all on the list are violations, some are just statistics. She said there has been improvement in the number of bugs in the alcohol. Commissioner Munoz asked Mr. Bedi if he is aware that a permit is needed for special events. He asked, "If you knew that, why did you open anyway?" P177 ,.,t HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION L I AND PLANNING COMMISSION RANCHO MINUTES CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 9 Mr. Bedi said the only time they did that was for the World Cup. They had many requests to open, so they did, it was the only time. Commissioner Fletcher said he is on notice and he is assuming (Mr. Bedi) knows the items to be corrected and that he (Mr. Bedi) had no objection to working on them. Mr. Bedi said he will make sure those are handled. Commissioner Fletcher said the Police only come if someone complains. He said you have to take that into account. He said at night, at the location of this business, sound travels. He said complaints have been received from the Red Hill area at night regarding truck noise. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said he has visited the site several times and similar establishments and none are open before 11:00 am. He asked what they will be doing at 9:00 am and if they would be serving alcohol at 9:00 am. Mr. Bedi said the only reason is that Sunday games start at 10:00 am on Sundays and they are packed by 9:45 am. He said they want to be sure they can serve them-breakfast, Blood . Mary's, Mimosas etc.; we want to be sure we are ready and that they do not want to violate their opening time. He said they would only be open on special sport event Sundays not even on Saturdays. Commissioner Howdyshell said she understands the importance of a missed kickoff time. She said most violations likely occur after the noon hour. She said this establishment has designed a business so people have a place to go if they want to watch the game. She said a historical building does have limitations and restrictions and we should see what can be done to assist the business. She said the business owners want to comply and we would like to see them succeed. She said she also wants to move forward with staff's recommendation for a 6-month review. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said the applicant has disputed/disagreed some aspects of the deputy's report. He said many should be easy to clarify such as what is to be posted, doors open/closed; we want clear agreement. He did not see how they could move forward if there is anything the applicant disagrees with is in the permit language. He said he is concerned about what is in the report and what they disagree with. He said he takes the deputies report at face value. You need to read and understand what you agreed to. Mr. Bedi said he did not see anything in the report he disagrees with but the number of flies in the alcohol has dropped, the number of false alarms is down. He said they had noise complaints in the first 3 months but none since then. He said with respect to the doors • open/closed, it just seems to be communication -if the City says they have to stay closed P178 S HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION L" AND PLANNING COMMISSION _ MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONOA SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 10 then, they will keep them closed. He said this is the first he has heard of this. Commissioner Fletcher asked about the report of stolen TVs. Mr. Bedi said prior to their opening they hired a plumbing contractor that they caught stealing TVs and that was one of the calls. He said they are not worried about the number of calls. He said they want to make sure they do not have another incident like the murder; they cannot call every time someone is asked to leave the bar. Commissioner Munoz said we are here to help. He suggested they read their agreement and understand it. He said they knew going in it was a historic building and that would limit what they could do. He said they can't get upset about that as they knew the rules. He said there is no joy in seeing the building empty. He said it is not the City telling you can do something for some other reason. Commissioner Munoz said the City wants them to be successful. He said he did not have a problem with the two hours, but he does have a problem with violating the permits. Mr. Bedi said it is frustrating to see other buildings-they have better signage. He said, you will never see us violate the CUP ever again. "If you walk out there and tell us our speakers are loud, we will take them out." Chairman Wimberly opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing none, closed the public hearing. He then commented and said the City approved their permits and they agreed to all the requirements. He said the request for more hours is admirable but there is a compliance issue with the rules of the existing permits. He said he did not see for public safety an extension of time if they are not in compliance. He said the recommendation from staff is to give them the hours and then bring them back in 6 months. He said he is not supportive of this request. He said when we see they can be in compliance with all the rules and regulations then we can entertain the request for additional hours. Commissioner Fletcher said the applicant would like to comply and are willing to comply. He said he did not see a big issue with their request for two hours and how that triggered a report from the Police and ACT. The ACT reported on what has gone on here. He said he understands false alarms and they need to do what they need to do to reduce that. He said the murder was probably people at the wrong location at the wrong time. He said 3 fights is not a lot but security needs to escort them out and if you don't think you can control it then call the cops. He said people may drink too much and get out of hand at a bar. He said `calls for service'is a double edged sword-you are supposed to call to diffuse the situation but it also adds to the tally. With respect to noise issues-make sure they don't exceed the approved levels and be aware people may complain. He said uncapped bottles get flies- cap them and check them. P179 ;\ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION L11 AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CRANCHO UCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 11 Commissioner Munoz said it is no different from other restaurant/bars in the City-we ask them all to comply-some have and some haven't. He said the Commission will visit this again in 6 months. He said this can be fixed and their attitude about this-He said this is part of doing business. He said you have a better opportunity to make money above that of most people. He said he has no problem with giving the 2 extra hours-you made a commitment-and we are ready to try to help. If you get the idea to open/close at the spur of the moment-don't do it. He said the recommendation is to allow the earlier 2 hours in the morning and then we come back for a review. He said this gives ample time to address this and if they have problems, work with the staff. He said we have a great staff and excellent police; they've worked with us before. He said they just report the facts. He said he believes the business owners can do a good job there and he has faith in them. He said he should read his permit thoroughly and get his staff to follow it. Commissioner Howdyshell said she applauds the owners and believe the corrections will be done. She said she supports the staff recommendation as it is important for the business and the City. She said the 6-month review is just a minor thing to do to look at where we stand today from 6 months from now. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said it was disconcerting to read the deputy's report. He said he is glad staff recommended we revisit this in 6 months. He echoed Commissioner Munoz' comment that it is all black and white regarding the fact that their permits are their guiding lights. He said the applicant has proven they can operate various businesses in the City. He said this is a new business concept for them; and even after a year or two there are rough patches and changes that occur. He said he supports the request but noticed the competitors do not open this early and perhaps this may be a new opportunity. He said he would like to see them re-visit in 6 months for the improvements. He said be clear about posting their signage, security levels and continue good decisions demonstrated at the other businesses. He thanked them for being here. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher to approve the CUP Modification request as presented with staff's recommendation for a 6-month review. Carried 5-0. VI , COMMISSION BUSINESS/I31STORIC PRESERVATION AND '1..4-,-; PtiANNWG COMMISSION ' !'-, , , PI f`' : . Chairman Wimberly offered a hearty "welcome back!" was offered to Commissioner Fletcher. Commissioner Munoz offered congratulations to the new Chairman, Ray Wimberly and Vice Chairman Francisco Oaxaca. P180 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ak* AND PLANNING COMMISSION a MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 12 Commissioner Munoz commented on how difficult it is for our deputies and noted his trust in their reports and commended them on their work. Commissioner Howdyshell also commended the deputies and said the work they do is a reflection of our City standards. She said our City is seen as a safe city and that we and our Police take that seriously. 121;: :- :._VII :4; ADJOURNMENT r� THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL IMMEDIATELY ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP TO DISCUS PRE- APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00613—ALTA RANCHO. THE WORKSHOP WILL BE HELD IN THE RAINS ROOM. Jeff Bloom, DCM Economic and Community Development noted that the applicant withdrew his application and therefore the workshop would not be held. The Commission adjourned at 8:30 PM I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 18, 2014, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. elIf you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at(909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. P181 t HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION L AND PLANNING COMMISSION • MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 13 It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. • All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us • P182 P183 0- C co tan O 2 ( (D oe bO C w • C C •(1) a) (j N 0 -- - 07vdsns 0 a n. EXHIBIT D P184 0 � -0 Cr3 CD O a HoI o,wrna t) a ONO$H EXHIBIT E P185 FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Table of Contents CEQA Review DRC2014-00127 1. Environmental Information Form (Part I— Initial Study) 2. Environmental Checklist Form (Part II—Initial Study) 3. Mitigation Monitoring Checklist (Part Ill - Initial Study) 4. Comment Letter from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 5. Follow-Up Habitat Study (Ecological Sciences, October 27, 2014) 6. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Recover Permit related to follow-up Habitat Study 7. Staff Response to Comments related to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service comments 8. Mitigation Monitoring Program 9. Mitigated Negative Declaration Form for Signature EXHIBIT F • Printfa • 1 ENVIRONMENTAL Lh ' INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) RANCHO (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) CUCAMONGA Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as,but not limited to,traffic,noise,biological,drainage,and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the__ applicant wilt be responsible tb pay or reimbuise the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: CSF Headquarters Name&Address of project owner(s): Ramesh Dolwani and Veena Dolwani 2941 N. Locust Avenue Rialto, CA 92377 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor Commerce Construction Co., L.P. 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, 6th Floor City of Industry, CA 91746 p (. Page 1of10 P187 Contact Person&Address: John Burroughs, Commerce Construction Co., L.P. 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, 6th Floor, City of Industry, CA 91746 Name&Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): Tracy Zinn, T&B Planning 17542 East 17th Street, Suite 100 Tustin, CA 92780 Telephone Number: 714-397-4224 PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk(')is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site,and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): Southeast corner of Mission Park Drive and Richmond Place. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 229-401-06, 07,08&09 '5) Gross Site Area(ac/sq.ft.): 6.6 acres `6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 6.6 acres dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): The Proposed Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation for the Proposed Project Site from Industrial Park(0.40 -0.60 FAR)to General Industrial (0.50-0.60 FAR)and a Zoning Map Amendment to modify the zoning from Industrial Park(IP)to General Industrial(GI). Updated 4/11/2013 Page 2 of 10 • ( f P188 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Tentative Parcel Map, Design Review, Grading Permit & Building Permit. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and/or hydrologic studies.biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The Proposed Project Site consists of an approximately 6.6-acre lot located along the south side of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The Proposed Project Site includes Assessor's Parcel Numbers(APNs)229-401-06, -07, -08, and -09. Biology Report prepared for the Proposed Project Site indicates that the Site is generally flat, and consists of disturbed, undeveloped land dominated by non-native grasses and forbs and classifies the site as "Disturbed/Ruderal." A Phase I Environmental Assessment identifies prior use of the Proposed Project Site as ranch or agricultural land from at least the mid-1800s into the 1980s. By 1989, the farms had disappeared and the Site was a vacant graded lot. No significant changes have occurred since that time. The Phase I Environmental Assessment states that regulatory database information identified no known or suspected contamination sites within the Proposed Project Site and few known or suspected contamination sites in the area surrounding the Proposed Project Site. Sources: Biological Technical Report for the CSF Project located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, prepared by Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. and Phase I Environmental Assessment, 6.6-acre property, Mission Park Drive and Buffalo Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California prepared by SCS Engineers. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 or 10 • P189 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): According to the Phase I Environmental Assessment, the Proposed Project Site was used as ranch or agricultural land from at least the mid-1800s into the 1980s. Cultural and paleontological reports have not been conducted for the Proposed Project Site, and due to the Site's extensive past disturbance from agricultural activity, there is little to no liklihood of cultural resources being present on the Site. 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: A noise study has not been conducted to determine the existing noise levels. However, due to the Proposed Project Site's proximity to 4th Street, located approximately 700 feet to the south, and Interstate 15, located approximate 0.30 miles to the east, there are likely to be existing noise levels commensurate with the traffic associated with those roadways. The Proposed Project is a warehouse,which is not a noise-sensitive use. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase,and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: The Proposed Project consists of a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Tentative Parcel Map and Design Review to allow for the construction of a warehouse and distribution facility on a 6.6 acre site. The Proposed Project consists of a single building comprised of 128,383 square feet of warehousing and 11,600 square feet of office space.The Proposed Project would include 103 standard automobile parking spaces and 15 tractor trailer parking spaces. The Proposed Project would include 14 loading bays and two vehicular access ramps.Access to the Proposed Project Site would be from Richmond Place in two locations, and from Buffalo Avenue from two locations.A detention basin and City standard recycling and trash enclosures would be located on the southern portion of the Site. Monumentation signs would be located adjacent to the two southern entries to the site from Richmond Place and Buffalo Ave. The Proposed Project would be constructed in one phase. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical,or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartmenthouses, shops, department stores. etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage,setback,rear yard,etc.): The Proposed Project Site is a vacant parcel surrounded by fully developed industrial and commercial properties.To the north is a multi-tenant commercial building designated as General Industrial(CI); to the east is an industrial building designated as Industrial Park(IP); to the south is a two-tenant commercial building designated as IP; to the west is a collection of commercial buildings designated as IP and industrial buildings designed as Cl. Surrounding building heights are two stories and setback from public right of ways are-25 ft. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 • P190 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The area surrounding the Proposed Project Site consists of industrial and commercial uses, including distribution warehouses to the north and east. The Proposed Project is consistent with the pattern, scale and character of the surrounding general area. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? A noise,study has not been prepared to evaluate noise levels. Short-term noise would occur during Project construction. Long-term noise would be limited to vehicular-related noise associated with vehicles traveling to from the Site and circulating within the Site. Surrounding uses are industrial and commercial,which are not noise-sensitive uses. Noise levels would be compatible with adjacent uses and no adverse effects will occur. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: Photographs of the Proposed Project Site show no mature or scenic trees located on the Site. 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: The Proposed Project Site drains to the City storm drain. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909) 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) N/A Peak use(gal/Day) N/A b. Commercial/Ind. al/da /ac 2.020 Peak use 5 (9 Y 1 (gaVmiNac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank 13 Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates)..For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909) 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) N/A b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) 2,020 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 • • P191 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units:N/A N/A Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes,minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): N/A 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $N/A to $N/A Rent(per month) $N/A to $N/A 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: N/A • 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: N/A 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: N/A a. Elementary: N/A b. Junior High: N/A c. Senior High COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial,industrial or institutional uses: The Proposed Project would be used as a warehouse and distribution facility. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 6 of 10 (10 P192 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: • 128,383 square feet of warehouse. 11,600 square feet of office. 27) Indicate hours of operation: M—F(8am—5pm) 28) Number of employees: Tota1:30 Maximum Shift: 30 Time of Maximum Shift: 8am- 5pm - 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): Warehouse Labor(Wage range$10- $20 an hour). Starting hire rate$10/hr. Clerical/Order desk(Wage range $9-$18 an hour). Starting hire rate$9/hr. Supervisors(Salary range$40 K-$60 K per year). Starting hire rate$40 K/per year. 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: 15 '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District,at(818)572-6283): An Air Quality analysis has not been conducted. Short-term air pollutant emissions would be expected during the construction phase of the Proposed Project, primarily associated with dust emissions during ground- disturbing activities and exhaust emissions from construction equipment. During long-term operation of the Proposed Project, the primary source of air pollutants would be mobile source emissions associated with motor vehicles traveling to and from the Site and circulating within the Site. ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. Water, sewer, fire and flood control agencies serving the Proposed Project have not been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate services to the Proposed Project. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 7 of 10 0 • f P193 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include,but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides and herbicides;fuels,oils,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage. and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, it known. A Phase I Environmental Assessment was conducted for the Site in April 2013. The Phase I found no evidence of the use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials on the property. Source: Phase I Environmental Assessment, 6.6-acre property, Mission Park Drive and Buffalo Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California prepared by SCS Engineers. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses,along with the storage and shipment areas,shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. There are currently no plans for the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials by the Proposed Project's expected tenant. • 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts.statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: Signature: Title: Updated 4/11/2013 Page 8 of 10 : ( . P194 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit(tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit(tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit(tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit(tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 of 10 0 • • P195 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248_ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 10 of 10 111 S P196 HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE STATEMENT I have been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga of my responsibilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5 (copy attached) to notify the City as to whether the site for which a development application has been submitted is located within an area which has been designated as the location of a hazardous waste site by the Office of Planning and Research, State of California (OPR). I have also been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga that, as of the date of executing this Statement OPR has not yet compiled and distributed a list of hazardous waste site as required by said Section 65962.5. I am informed and believe that the proposed site for which a development application has been submitted is not within any area specified in said Section 65962.5 as a hazardous waste site. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. / I II Applicant: Dated: z' r- /-1 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 5 0 _ P197 -.'' iji 1?: .3 - W , 3 a i 1 4, ) . 1 ii e-%, , , -It Si a. • 1 N• •.. •• ■• i • tier' i;' (K ria- 1c ! 'ro,. LLJ ,� {Z x U • I It I ▪ 11 f n ) ta i i • (;?f 1 ) 0 • 't {t! p il1+1=lt i!;' 1 ■ 1 • 1 ly • , • til ; i . . , i • i /... k _ --•tJ.... a ., -°. — — c '~• 1 1 Z } :. ,s,. -•a..w..•....w.nw .�- � ,»wrmryuu�utsa..,NV• real S314 601/ N, r __I . t l I t V ,, • . `.7, • a , 6,. , . co F. M '' 31I . ' ,0' �r I a / , , u 2 I� ! 1 1 ;v • - .. (` A l � il ' it OC c 1 ;, OA 1 ,4,.„,r,.. .....rc,....•....-.,.i.IT.•*, ) .1 , x rte''00.4 1 , O t / _ HI. q Q 111 < , , ti �.(kCI r / /I:. 1. 1 ' 1. 11 1 1 i �' 1 ill s— '-i.-• .) ...., fl v l 3 • , U • .✓, I, LJJ P'= I ,' 31 r ri MO, I 0 ('3 r[p[e� a ._.. I I• - ::-: , 11 , i as 1 V Adapted from USGS Guasti, CA quadrangle z' 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 - Feet •_ _ • 0 P198 a • IF t: . ..• . .. .,,e , . i :. i- • „,_ • ,,,,c, l wi il 111 iill i t-.,- ..., , Ik g s -+•16: 4„... • i ,_ .. , (1),,I• 44° (I) , IIMINI,,IIMINIP 1•1111111.111111111111••■.111•11•11,•01110 4-, 11111111111.11.11 • Mr w • •wwoo.1■11.■: .0■■ 1---- SD • e_ _ - — _ -. . ._ _ _ _ • < ..0 _ _ ,_ •• _ ___ . ....... X Buffalo Avenue _____ C..) U..I . , 0 _____ -- .,_..., . ta (1) i ... ..1. . .. .-..-- ci U) - _ . .4. . - • , A;. .Ti■ 3: ::- • o.,- ' 9 i . . . . . _ . --•,. ..r.- - k - k.,,- it. L; .% . -S- i • . 4. . . , • • -.4. ,, ,.4:"..-- • ' .- - , -4,)(41,. 1..!■ L, 0 (1) I 4 • i 4 - .• ..-- 1 .4„.., • U) i • . ! ■ I i . .404",‘r .. • 0 -ci i ' .. •.'i: - .P'''-'f. 0 .2.' D , ..::- . • '• Z.-. -J , ' —i,,;.4 9, E i . • f i . a i • .:•. , . -' . .. , - • i.... : •"' ,, a'0 I ei • ., •, P-: f . ....,,,,.._, 1,,:,.. I, a) ..„..' . - '1;..e ••:; ' -40,<i .,.ir • . - >-. ,_ I .6 '') LL..I I 'D Jo 1 . - -Th, --...;:, . 1 •-• iiilltS ;r: ,ii ", • • 4- =-•:-' --- ' 1-..t.. _I • o 60 .. t I ' •"0"‹.' ?1, -11' „ ..4,1 — . not ••-,',,g. .. _ •• . '-, ,i r -7 ,1- • ., -1.% .4 . (....D ' •-. ,:,._: : ,, .,'' ”.t 14,0%, .. • :'' , L. . ..'" , 7.,•_,_.71' , _ 'Eh--F. •••4. . • ' • • , - . • - • ,z, ......4. ill 8-,.. i • • __, , • .). 0 - • 111? •ai e , s e> ,7, e C ' g ,_ . ... .. ..".••• - ILA 0 — '-. ... -1 .. 0 § 0.) <43 is • ,.'1''', .■t...,‘Ell,.. IS*• ■ . , '.■ .•1-• .• •. *. NA_ ' f ,... ak, . • ' ' • .2, 44 y . „,,, 'ff. ?, • - '41,- --•• o — t # : . ,-'',.• . 4. : •. . , J■,••/,'. 4, _ . ... . • • . , • •, , s. . ,r••. . . Or t` "' . • . ." . - s I,,,,.• - 'I'', '''' ' ' • • . . ILAI Sob I ' . 1 . •. . • . . ... . - . _ 4 . . - - - 1 . 4 ... • . . . . . „ -,., f•••• ...... '. A'.••...a • . - • . ' .'1, ... ' s '' - 't"....A.'"...•." ' - '' 4,',A A 4,-. . " . . ' ... ... ,I.94 . .,. 4. ,•: -. . •44. . I Illoyik . .. -,: --. . ....-.--.-.-. ..-.-. •-• - " ''-' "'d ' -: --- - ,, --- • ...--- -• • '.......• _ ........,..• - e • ..1_ ITIFiler. ..„ - .• , -A- • 4.1r .C . ,.....' . --a- • ..... . ' •-••.e._ • '.111:, 11,1L'ipw wee .... 444111 ... 1 r .111 .. A' . 111 I-- U ca_ LLI co n 0 —en ... ; _.. r .. • , . . 4 • (f) A-4 .- • • I • S • I •— • ''..it/• 0 1 P199 . t LLJ Q U x O w cn cn . J . « Z r Y'-. w .+k s - J ice.. • .,. 4,�f.. «. Photograph 1: Northeastern view of Project site. Notice the disturbance and lack of native vegetation present. mil. . . Imaiiiiiiiiimeskiiikadagaihad , . - . . U D . ., -- . W 2 o • —" p F a i '. L CL -. U c5 Photograph 2: Northern view of Project site. Notice the disturbed nature of the site, along with the lack of native vegetation. 1 0 P200 1 co W , I— - < .Q - U x O w cn up Q co . •`a r. Photograph 3: Northwestern view of Project site. Notice the disturbance and lack of native vegetation present. O,. ..j.. ,.:( �" '.*Iiil- r -1 'E y � i- • a' b a _ CN ++• . • , r+ �'"` mot` - T I. l^'r :.�- 4.-.w�'' _ LL a r --..- r-•,muss. - U*'• Photograph 4: Western view of Project site. Notice the disturbed nature of the site, along with the lack of native vegetation. snoR i .Yp- .,.r00,C.n ar.m YCra.ccsw - ': - _ P mw ar � ■A - - - a.cseu R9W•sla•� "1S3rdW voNowaOno OHONdM a ;iil S if co V I —_.`.-.-.-- I Ewa,k.uac.anwiss 1N3hVdOY-1/s30 TOR115naNI ALTY32J 3LLS3NW +Et '.... '� P Q -o�wUJll,l,cw.13111 nr3 NV-Id 3JIS A�s.,A y e • !!!..^^.! k;b �-kF E iii> Q ^RRl 7 z 1- Q cr aa J tlllI Y YYYY w ~ in _) \,..._ anuaA'ode rg j 1.. ,., ,.1 „ ,,,, 1 ,____, I I i 1 i it , , . i .... 1 , s, _ i 1- r -i "NI 1 1 I s� I , - - �— , • 1 Z • i i1 m $i I i 11 : $ a- L �I3 a mv f. €4 r, I! a ` r v u-t--- = r ^r 1 C 1 /Ili rYn 1 -I- a ■ bj 1 IS 1 _ i 1 r L L L -1-I / • s 1 1a • ■ L_ ■ YYYr ,04 i 1 .09 4Y} I, - s i ieple.00e i e M ; : 4 sx- i 6I — a k y- F t _ ,n-wa r..r1rA 51 eoe1d puowi10.1 • • P202 ` � City of Rancho Cucamonga " ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II QM BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review DRC2014-00127 2. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126. 3. Description of Project: The proposed project is the construction of a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a vacant parcel of 6.6 acres located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. The underlying General Plan designation of the property is Industrial Park and the underlying zoning designation of the project site is Industrial Park (IP) District. The project includes a request to change the zoning designation of the project site from Industrial Park (IP) District to General Industrial (GI) District (General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126). The Development Code' distinguishes warehouse/storage/distribution tenants who occupy tenant spaces of 50,000 square feet or less as Wholesale, Storage and Distribution - Light and tenants who occupy over 50,000 square feet as Wholesale, Storage and Distribution - Medium. The Industrial Park (IP) District only permits Wholesale, Storage and Distribution — Light and not Medium. The applicant is requesting to construct a 139,983 square foot building designed for warehouse/storage/distribution tenants over 50,000 square feet. In order to do so, the land use designation must be changed from Industrial Park (IP) District to General Industrial (GI) District, which permits Wholesale, Storage and Distribution— Medium. 4. Applicant: Commerce Construction Company, LLC 13191 Crossroads Parkway North City of Industry, CA 91746 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park 6. Zoning: Industrial Park(IP) District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is vacant land that has been graded and street improvements have been installed. The site drains roughly north to south and is dominated by non-native grasses. The site is surrounded by industrial buildings to the north, east and west in the General Industrial (GI) District and by a commercial development to the south in the Industrial Park (IP) District. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner (909)477-2750 • P203 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 2 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: N/A GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD—California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES —National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx— Nitrogen Oxides ROG— Reactive Organic Gases PMio— Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB— Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓)Aesthetics (✓)Agricultural Resources (✓)Air Quality (/)Biological Resources (✓ ) Cultural Resources (✓) Geology& Soils (✓) Greenhouse Gas ( ) Hazards &Waste Materials (1) Hydrology&Water Quality Emissions ( ) Mineral Resources (✓ ) Noise ( ) Land Use & Planning ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Utilities & Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of (V)Transportation/Traffic Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (1) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. • Rev 2-26-13 P204 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 3 ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: Date: I? ICI ity ► / 1 Reviewed By: Date: v� Rev 2-26-13 • • P205 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation r Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (1) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The site is located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is characterized by industrial development to the north, east and west and by commercial development to the south. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project as the surrounding development is of similar design and density. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards including using shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 1 • P2O6 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than pp 9 Significant Mltigaran Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g) d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? - e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is characterized by industrial development to the north, east and west and by commercial development to the south. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are Rev 2-26-13 • • P207 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 6 Less Than Significant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than c PP 9 Significant coWith Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The site is located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is characterized by industrial development to the north, east and west and by commercial development to the south. The nearest agricultural use is more than 2 miles west from the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the air quality management plan (AQMP) (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Rev 2-26-13 P208 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Both the State of California and the federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less (PMio), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM151 and PM2.$) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect•sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMio), fine • particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.$) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PMio and PM2.s. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air impact study was prepared by Urban Crossroads (April 21, 2014) that utilizes CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational Rev 2-26-13 • • P209 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyPotentially wnh Than PP g rm r : Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction) Impacts There will be minimal short term impact related to the project. New construction related to the project will consist of a tilt-up building, street improvements, new landscaping, paving and screen walls. The mitigation measures outlined below will reduce the potential effects on the environment to less than significant. Table 1: Construction Emissions without Mitigation Emissions(pounds per day) Year VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 2015 9.61 117.79 70.52 0.09 16.01 8.48 2016 109.69 51.31 25.41 0.05 3.22 2.61 Maximum Daily Emissions 109.69 117.79 70.52 0.09 16.01 8.48 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? YES YES NO NO NO NO Table 2: Construction Emissions with Mitigations Emissions(pounds per day) Year VOC NO, CO 50, PMI0 PM2.5 2015 2.90 47.59 49.33 0.09 12.90 5.73 2016 65.87 35.41 25.03 0.05 2.03 1.76 Maximum Daily Emissions 65.87 47.59 49.33 0.09 12.90 5.73 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO I NO NO Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources, such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. The most recent version of CaIEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) was used to calculate the construction emissions as shown on Tables 1 and 2 above. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during Rev 2-26-13 • • P210 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially M gafion Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact -Impact construction varies substantially on a project-by-project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Tables 1 and 2 above lists total construction emissions that have incorporated a number of feasible control measures that can be reasonably implemented to significantly reduce PMio emissions from construction activities. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that application of the architectural coatings for the proposed peak construction day will result in a peak of 65.87 lbs/day of VOCs using mitigation measures MM AQ-1 and MM AQ-2. Therefore, VOC emissions will not exceed for SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day with the following mitigation measures: 1) The project shall implement Mitigation Measures MM AQ-1 and MM AQ-2 for the reduction of VOC emissions below SCAQMD Regional Threshold levels as follows: • Only "Zero-Volatile Organic Compounds" paints (no more than 150 gram/liter of VOC) and/or High Pressure Low Volume (HPLV) applications consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113 shall be used. • During construction activity, all construction equipment (equal to or greater than 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (GARB) Tier 3 Certified or better. Additionally, during grading activity, total horsepower-hours per day for all equipment shall not exceed 18,088 horsepower-hours per day and the maximum disturbance (actively graded) area shall not exceed 5 acres per day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Rev 2-26-13 • • P211 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With han PP g rs: Signifcant it Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project- specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. 4) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 5) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 6) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Rev 2-26-13 • • P212 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant nt Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 7) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 8) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 9) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 10) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Long Term (Operational) Impacts Lonq Term Project Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of industrial buildings in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. Based on trip generation factors included in the traffic study (Urban Crossroads, April 2014), long-term operation emissions associated with the proposed project, calculated with the CalEEMod model (Version 2013.2.2) shows that the increase of all criteria pollutants as a result of the proposed project would be less than the corresponding SCAQMD daily emission thresholds (see Table 3 below). Therefore, project-related long-term air quality impacts would not be significant. Mitigation measures would not be required. Rev 2-26-13 P213 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Table 3: Summary of Peak Operational Emission (summer and winter) Emissions(pounds per day) Operational Activities-Summer Scenario VOC. NO, 'CO 50, PM,. PM2, Area Source 4.46 2.50e-4 0.03 -- 9.00e-5 9.00e-5 Energy Source 8.85e-3 0.08 0.07 4.80e-4 6.12e-3 6.12e-3 Mobile(Passenger Cars) 1.17 1.18 17.35 0.04 3.57 0.96 Mobile(Trucks) 2.66 48.50 24.52 0.12 4.56 1.84 Maximum Daily Emissions 8.30 49.76 41.97 0.16 8.14 2.81 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Emissions(pounds per day) Operational Activities-Winter Scenario, VOC „ .NO; , CO SO, PMr0 • PMys Area Source 4.46 2.50e-4 0.03 9.00e-5 9.00e-S Energy Source 8.85e-3 0.08 0.07 4.80e-4 6.12e-3 6.12e-3 Mobile(Passenger Cars) 1.09 1.26 14.84 0.04 3.57 0.96 Mobile(Trucks) 2.72 50.56 25.86 0.12 4.56 1.85 Maximum Daily Emissions 8.27 51.90 40.80 0.16 8.14 2.82 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (long term) Long Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR)analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 2) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 3) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 4) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 5) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 6) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. Rev 2-26-13 • • P214 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Foal With Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 8) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of.10 minutes). 9) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 10) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 11) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storaqe/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 0.25- mile of a sensitive receptor, a hotel, Courtyard by Marriott, at 11525 Mission Vista Drive located 325 feet southwest from the project site. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. Rev 2-26-13 • • P215 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would include cooking and gardening. Similarly common odors associated with mixed-use and commercial land uses would be expected (i.e. restaurants). Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) O (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with industrial uses. The site has previously been graded and regularly cleared of brush. The project site is sporadically vegetated by weedy invasive plants commonly found in areas with a high level of disturbance. A Biological Technical Report (Glenn Lukos Asssociates, Inc., July 2013) was submitted with the project. The report concluded that the project site does not contain desirable habitat for special status species. Therefore, significant cumulative effect to Rev 2-26-13 • I P216 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mien Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact biological resources as a result of the proposed project are not anticipated. According to the report, no impact to the burrowing owl is expected to occur due to a lack of suitable habitat. However, a 30-day pre-construction burrowing owl survey is recommended as a mitigation measure. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated with the following mitigation measure. 1) A 30-day pre-construction burrowing owl survey is required prior to approval of a rough grading permit. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area with a soil types that accommodate the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly. The Biological Technical Report (Glenn Lukos Asssociates, Inc., July 2013) submitted for the project concluded that due to the past high level of disturbance, combined with the lack of dunes and presence of compacted, graded soil, that no further biological studies for the fly are required. Additionally, no other sensitive biological resources or endangered species of plants or animals were found on the site. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There is one heritage tree on the project site that will be integrated into the project site and not removed. Therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Neither the City nor the 501 are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? Rev 2-26-13 • • P217 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant coWithon Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation) Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). In compliance with California SB18 for projects that include a General Plan Amendment, project notification was submitted on February 25, 2014 to local tribal communities (as listed by the Native American Heritage Commission) for comment. None of the communities that were contacted requested consultation. Additionally, a request was sent to the Archaeological Information Center at the San Bernardino County Museum for a Historical Resources Review. The report was received on March 20, 2014 and found that there were no previously recorded historical resources recorded within or adjacent to the project area. Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original • illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Rev 2-26-13 • • P218 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially ignifi alnt with Than pp 9 Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for . paleontological resources. Additionally, per a report received from the Archaeological Information Center at the San Bernardino County Museum, dated March 20, 2014, there were no previously recorded historical resources recorded within or adjacent to the project area. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. Additionally, per a report received from Archaeological Information Center at the San Bernardino County Museum, dated March 20, 2014, there were no previously recorded historical resources recorded within or adjacent to the project area. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely Rev 2-26-13 • • P219 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 18 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact event human remains are discovered on-site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. H) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Hi) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault passes within 3.7 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 6.3 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is about 16 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is about 18 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to Rev 2-26-13 • • P220 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant• No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: • 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PKo emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types on-site consist of Delhi Fine Sand (Db) Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Delhi Fine Sand (Db) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically nearly level to strongly slopping soil is on alluvial fans that have been reworked by wind action. Runoff is very slow, and the hazard of soil blowing is generally moderate. In unprotected area, however, the hazard of soil blowing is high. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 • • P221 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 20 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Significant Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Imp act Incorporated Imp act Impact 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) () indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Regulations and Significance - The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N2O], hydrofluorocarbons [HFCs], perfluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF's]. The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other • solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures Rev 2-26-13 • • P222 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated _ Impact Impact (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a performance based standard") (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PMio, PM2.s, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the _ project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PMio, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's - Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. A greenhouse gas analysis was prepared for the project (Urban Crossroads, April 2014) that reviewed the long term project related operational emissions. The report concluded that the project will result in approximately 2,731.66 MTCO2e per year as shown on Table 1 below; the proposed project would not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur. Rev 2-26-13 • • P223 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mitigation Tnic Significant Impact corporate SiImp c Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Table 1: Total Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Annual) • Emissions(metric tons per year) • Emission Source CO, CH, N,0 Total CO3E Annual construction-related emissions amortized 2.49 0.0007 -- 2.51 over 30 years Area 5.96e-3 2.00e-S — 6.32e-3 Energy 121.06 5.99e.3 1.40e-3 121.62 Mobile Sources(Passenger Cars) 510.14 0.02 -- 510.66 Mobile Sources(Trucks) 2,034.76 0.02 — 2,0.35.11 Waste 26.71 1.58 -- 59.87 Water Usage 3.62 . 0.03 6.70e-4 4.39 Total CO2E(All Sources) 2,731,66 Source:alEEMod-model output,see Appendix LI for detailed model outputs. Note:Totals obtained from CalEEMod^and may not total 100%due to rounding. Table results Include scientific notation.a is used to represent times ern raised to the power of(whim would be written as ma'1 and is followed by the value of the exponent Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel- powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, CH4, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. Rev 2-26-13 • • P224 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant corporate Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural • gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a worst case scenario with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. As noted above, the project involves the construction of a 139,983 square foot warehouse and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: 1) Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. 2) Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 3) Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, use daylight as an integral part of the lighting systems in buildings. 4) Install light-colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. 5) Install energy-efficient heating and cooling systems, appliances and equipment and control systems. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB)375. • Rev 2-26-13 P225 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With man PP g Significant Mitigation Significant ImNo Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The project's long term operation emissions will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAQMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develop the site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Rev 2-26-13 • • P226 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 25 Less Than Significant Less Potentially wThan and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitiga tion Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The GHG emissions created by the proposed project have been analyzed based on the proposed thresholds and guidelines provided by SCAQMD. As currently proposed by CARB, a quantitative threshold of 7,000 metric tons of CO2e per year for operational emissions (excluding transportation) and performance standards yet to be defined for construction and transportation emissions are under consideration. However, CARB's proposal is not yet final, and thus cannot be applied to the project. Initially, SCAQMD staff presented the working group with a significance threshold that could be applied to various types.of project — residential; non-residential; industrial; etc. However the threshold is still under development. In December 2008, staff presented the SCAQMD Governing Board with a significance threshold for stationary source projects where it is the lead agency. This threshold uses a tiered approach to determine a project's significance, with 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) as a screening numerical threshold for industrial projects. The thresholds for GHG emissions were determined at the SCAQMD's Working Group's eighth meeting on January 28, 2009. The working group released these thresholds for projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency. The threshold requires that project related GHG emissions be less than 10,000 tons per year of CO2e. Since the SCAQMD provided substantial evidence in determining their draft GHG emission thresholds, this analysis has utilized 10,000 metric tons per year of CO2e as the threshold. The greenhouse gas analysis that was prepared for the project (Urban Crossroads, April 2014) concluded that the project will result in approximately 2,731.66 MTCO2e per year as shown on Table 1 above and will not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, the project would not result in a significant impact on GHG. b) The project proposes the construction of a 139,983 square foot warehouse. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard. Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. • Rev 2-26-13 P227 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Petenfiany wWith Than an PP g r Significant Mitigation Significant Im pact Incrported Im pact Impact 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The proposed 139,983 square foot building is designed for the storage and distribution of finished products and will not include activities that utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. The General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment changing the land use from Industrial Park to General Industrial Park will not significantly change the types of uses permitted on the site or the types of stored materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Rev 2-26-13 • • P228 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than- significant. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed 139,983 square foot building is designed for the storage and distribution of finished products and will not include activities that utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no schools located within 0.25-mile of the project site. The nearest school, Rancho Cucamonga Middle School at 10022 Feron Boulevard, is located about 2 miles to the northwest of the project site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. The project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 • • • P229 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (/) ( ) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Rev 2-26-13 • • P230 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 29 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With an PP g Significant coWithon Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by PBLA Engineering (May, 20, 2014) which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed • by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan • (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance Rev 2-26-13 P231 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 30 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With an PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by PBLA Engineering (May, 20, 2014) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape Rev 2-26-13 P232 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 31 Less Than Significant Less Potentially Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Mitigation on Si nt No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from • the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as Rev 2-26-13 P233 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Incorporated Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) • or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is characterized by industrial development to the north, east and west and by commercial development to the south. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding industrial development to the north, east and west. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The new land use and zoning designation will not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated c) According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area with a soil type that accommodates the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly. The Biological Technical Report (Glenn Lukos Asssociates, Inc., July 2013) submitted for the project concluded that due to the past high level of disturbance, combined with the lack of dunes and presence of compacted, graded soil, that no further biological studies for the fly are required. Additionally, no other sensitive biological resources or endangered species of plants or animals were found on the site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 • • P234 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 33 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: • a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) V) ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building; hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby commercial uses is expected. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess.of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes Rev 2-26-13 • • P235 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 34 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Sig n Information SourcePotentially ialPotentially Wat nan Sig Potentially Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that • exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00'p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction Rev 2-26-13 • • P236 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. • e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is vacant land. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) Refer to 13.b above. Rev 2-26-13 • • P237 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 36 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: SnPotentially With Than PP g m r Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) c) Schools? ( ) () () (✓) d) Parks? () () () (✓)�� e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The site is located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and will be served by a Fire Station #4 at 11297 Jersey Boulevard, located approximately 1 mile north from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storaqe/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. No impacts are anticipated. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Old Town Park at 10033 Feron Boulevard, is located 2 miles northwesterly from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Rev 2-26-13 P238 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 37 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 • square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district,the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to a less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. No impacts are anticipated. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? • b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Old Town Park at 10033 Feron Boulevard, is located 2 miles northwesterly from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) Refer to 15.a above. Rev 2-26-13 • • P239 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 38 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( )• ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 653 net trip-ends per day on a typical weekday with 55 net vehicles per hour during the weekday AM peak and 59 net vehicles per hour during the weekday PM peak hour. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storaqe/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared for the project (Urban Crossroads, April 2014)which calculated average daily vehicle trips (ADT) based on trip generation rates collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) as presented in ITE's most current edition of Trip Generation (9th Edition, 2012). The Traffic Impact Analysis found that there were no study area intersections that were found to be impacted by the project. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in Rev 2-26-13 • • P240 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 39 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. The Traffic Impact Analysis also recommends a number of site access improvements. The project will be required to implement the following measure: 1) Implement the site access improvement outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the project (Urban Crossroads, April 2014) and described in Section 1.6.1 (Site Access Improvements) and on Exhibit 1 — 3 (On-Site Access and Circulation Recommendations) of the analysis. b) The proposed project will generate 55 morning two-way peak hour trips and 59 evening two-way peak hour trips. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. The proposed project is a 139,983 • square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). No impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 • • P241 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 40 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant corporae Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impacl 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that Rev 2-26-13 • • P242 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 41 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Rev 2-26-13 • • P243 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 42 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) The proposed project is a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse building. Although buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet that could be used for other purposes are permitted within the current zoning district, the construction and use of buildings with a floor area that exceeds 50,000 square feet for the purpose of warehouse/storage/distribution uses is not permitted. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will allow warehouse/storage/distribution buildings constructed on the project site to exceed 50,000 square feet in floor area. Development of the site change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. Rev 2-26-13 P244 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 43 • EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (T) Traffic Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads, April 21, 2014) (T) Biological Technical Report (Glenn Ludos Associates, Inc., July 22, 2013) (T) Air Quality Analysis (Urban Crossroads, April 21, 2014) (T) Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Urban Crossroads, April 21, 2014) (T) Letter from U.S. Fish and Wildlife dated September 24, 2014 (T) Follow-up Habitat Study along with applicant's USFWS Recover Permit (October 27, . 2014) • (T) Staff Response to Comments from the USFWS Rev 2-26-13 P245 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2014-00127 Page 44 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, 1 have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental eff is would occur. • Applicant's Signature: M10 Date: _9- 22-('y Print Name and Title: John R Burroughs President P246 U C O "3 c E O O to U o C C o o v v V (/7 Z N N N N co co F. a c d o a `= o J `o is > 0 = O I- o o o o:� o Q 7).4. I) L o >- E• > a a a U U I— W Co V 0 C C C C J a) (O cc co co Q E C a a a a 0 — E o .. o ai o 0 0 O c um 3 a) a)Z U aa) a) C > > > > G is N E W . a) a) a) a) �"' C (0 F- > cC d' CC Q' U y co y r J 0. 0 C O Y C 0 o V a � z III o m m _ 2 u 0 0 0 0 d U m- Z - c 0 R " Q O• O 0 G 0.5 m _ • N Z C d' w d d a_ d Oct Q_ ate) c°)) m OC) a`) c°io --a; ,-c-,-- o ° m a; cU) Oto y2a) omc m c = 2 .oO_ m .= - Oa w .Ur OEoc � � � wE• O F C O a) a) L ifi C O .N N N o.o O r s N u) 5 a) = ° n_ C O N a) O 1— C Eo2a) -amo o ( 0U � owl ° '> a� oe � ° '0voa0 - QI n N o a@ L U .- o o j U a) Q a- al N E 0 m y o U o _ U C a) N C U. .0 N (q N .0 '0 En `O L E - o O , 1— o L O U) C L 0° @ C a) (O tT 3 L_ U Y a) C_ E f6 c>,0 a J a) F. N O F- C E O m 0 O . b � t (..) 'O N co X N (O .-. 'p to fla o 5. E 0)) C o -0 Ua LI) OrJ3a o ° Ur) maoEm o .En � o ° 0 o Q W E O u c c c c t9 o a) co a ° E a N ..� .=- U •C O t>0 .0 N C 0) 0 C C ~ _ .N Cn n c- cu (o U N E.d a) U C) O O o O) N C -O 00- a) jO - Y N .N N o co = ~ 'C N -O r N (O ... CT To 0 10 N C > . V C c m O U N � `- O CI- O O ` 0-L -O O a) -O a) U) to a) 0 y E . r .m eL.- O N N — 'a in — N > O V@ a) fA m L X C -O T to -O U .. o 7 U = h a) 000 > O E L U) C c ".r d' = N co cc a) d O O Z Q. a < a t; 5 o f m to � r > a) o mC c ° aQ a) 0.)-0 Y n =o co .U) afoi rn�_- o C r U to N c = o a o aCi 3 U CU 3 o T a a) U .a' o ° a) .6 e2 C Q U G O 'o m T m U N T a) DIE Q O o C (0 >' Q o > O U ♦+ I O o N co D 'O O N O U " to c a a) U '�- a) _ > N -a)O L CL (`6 Q V N O E C I_ Q .c O a) n_ E N N O coca @ @ O L 0 o L (Q Q L N d (O a. 2O CO U 2 N 6 co a o 0 O i_. w O.,N -°G Q. C 2 E (n V) r N co V F3 P247 N . C.) C O m C c E O O «« U C C C co 0 V V V V V d •co Z N N N N N N N V V V N R 'O C O C w a) • V O a) co > 0 C O L co O u L W � > 0 a s 0 a s 0 Q < Q c c O O U1 co co N N u) N U) o o C C C C C C C C S ` C a n a a n a d a C C O is O O O O O O O 45 O 0 0 0 a) c.) • 3 3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 °) Cr) c 4- m ' m N m N N a> N c c m ° m m a a m 5 P > ft IX CC CC CC CC C 0 0 Ca >. C U • O N 0• r 5 N C Q a) u- 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a rn a) c ao N C C C O O a2 aa) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cc 40 a in m m m m CO CO CO m co L C .` N S) m o T c L c co L O pow .0 '° ? N c 0 O) C} Cain mc - E cm 3 O -§ m co u, u) o .o m -cc E c E m :cv a) � � � � - aa)) a t ° E a:o o c c a) Nam a 0 � � m � .E C co DaE`o � w `° cn `)) .c '°t ° Ems " c ac) o EmyEc - `� - rn a) > o .N w >, C O) V) .°-' m r O Q a) 0 N ai .0 N o v co U m .-.. n mL.. "N N o m c a) .E)L -o a-) .L�. m'o L a � E E � -Om N ° ° o o0 Lcowoo) c Eamo aa) f) 0 ° 5 m ° > ° rn` 4C s °- - a) m N O C a m O O X C N V a) o O m u) v O ° m 0)m •- •- J LL m n m T N C v t a) � C 'O D a L m p)'O N N N N p ,C o a E o m a) .. o r .E2U ca ° O Emc_ o .. m c° o .maru) - a`) 0a) a� '6 o ° v ° N V) N "O U .�- Ill 0) a) X ..+ L C m U) C :� O)3 N D.!=' C o m U C p ° o � � .w�6 = -mo � >, T ao) m ao °)'gin °�' v ° .o 'er g 3 § � 3c' � E ° °- 2 0 Z ' a m m cOV ° a � wL c ° m- m Om -o N m a n C aVNo c v we- m -o u) °) • m N O a) C a) U m 9 m a) y C C C N L CD co m T O -p C 'd N E W v N N L m o J L U O)r m o N N om L- y O = ) a) N L_ c n o >N a) V c o o w a) L ° Q co a C 0 Co en .m y y " u) 3•- N ° >• O c m r a) _c -o ° o a) o m o r > E s w w > 6 w 0 m > - o t2 'O) ` E � vm mm = ca • rx ° 3a - ,ms «c o a ma a ni m U 0 o O a) _ > o c 2 U t® a 3 @ a. .gy3a ° U � < a <oo < < W oo_ •. • • • • • • rn- ,, a • E cs. m r; d . P248 U I- c O R a c E O O O ' • c ca 0 Tr N Z V V V V N N a1 •O C o C F a) m▪ 16 • 0 C O w 0 m O V L w O lc 0 0 E > Q Q Q a C C C O O O U U U N N 1_ m a) c C N N a a w O c C p •. 0 oU O O 0 a U a a o) >i 3 c w c c c a) a) E •c - c. C '> > P. 0 S 0 a) Ct co a >. c U ,- 'c C 0 E 6 0) 2li 0 0 U U U d a a) c•72 O N c' C c O O a2 co • w 07 0 0 0 ce CO -O a) (I) QI o E to :.c- a) C N N 0 co 0 co N U C O L a) to a7 > L L a3 a) _ L_. C co O) CO O 000 -' 0CD oEa - a`) '-'co .E ca S J3N Q N U S Q m 'O -o a) 0 2 a) c C_ 3 a rn v o () w N 00 - 0 O U N ,0 0 - d a) j u) u) E 0 N c a)) 'O >cO U N a`) a3 c O a N -0 L N U N o J .° as U N • L C1N '6 N d O 0 U a CO .'C.. L W w _ C '3 U .Jp O O J a ._ U O 3 D O f `p 0 a) O 0 N C a N -p N CO U - co N L 03 C U (N - O .L.. > .>'. a. m W a) N O > N C >i co t O •Wj C .L.. al -pp � � E J O_ -p ac c0i � N m E ., E •CD 0 d0 0 to as ai -- N �. 3 o a) 0 2 -O J ca 6 0 d J c a) C d (a J a) t ` N N > a O o ,E a) o — 0 C O OU a) N C Y C a) U N a) N a) a'p a) C O U ._ E N a N C a) - N O ,O N a) O O) O C ,p a > O N N .. •0 E 'p .N a)o..).>m ' c o N c o c c °� U c 3 C a) = s m 5 .� c L V -p O c d a) 0 J L a) >.N N O tt N L .� C N CO 0 N N G a N N y Y Uj N a) ? '3 O N CL i co C C N - ma; a) N N 'O c a, ` U L a L L p CT O U E E U N CD y Q a V C O Q C 0 N O N a) 0 0 N 0 3 ` 0 3 CO 'O N a o C '� O 0) 0 O a) O m E a) . o m - 'p) o p c6 c c in c c ' ca a) ;o a n a d C'u) J m 'c m E - d U 2 U 2 N N o OO U E o ` E E W a� a) a) J (Ya > O ,w 8@ • . N n E .N N C� o C- E d .> > N a U E n 5 2 .0 t o D a coy,.Y a N N 03 ft O N L o 'C U L 0 N N E L a) Q L p caa U N O` C aa)) o N U N O N N CO a E • H co m a CO CJ CO c •E a) H a) a) F U N a) I- a. a) > a > (fl p E p j - O m J .- N M V G[) a) • P249• O c o m w a c E 0 0 C C C) co co V at 0 CO Z V' N N N • co N t0 F. c N C ` a. a) a3 • O c O .O-. -a o . O ._ L 'C a O 0 . y ' 5 > Q a 0 0 O a) a) 0) -c C . C C C 0 C o n o a .' O O o O 4-0 o o co C w N a) a)N N E ` N N a) a) a) I- > CY cY K CY K co O) T C o 'c C o ✓ o •V C a) CO d 5 • ao C C O O 0 an m u)) 0 0 0 0 0 . re• ° m a a a a -O O N N 0 '0 a) — a) N — L_ O C L O -o "'a) a) a) = 3 a) C O O L v) a1 C o o to a ` 6 y n 3 D N O .O N ' U O x O N d N 3 'O X 3O O N O c O n.,- a) O)- .C c o N N c a) u) C C a) C, O c d N L 0 d .74 aO U. O > ' U L a) . C a3 VN y . a) 0 w 0 a) N da 'O O a a) a ca.) c a 0 O w m N y N .0 L O o vi— C ` u O o c c N ~ c o oSa a - 2i = u mO c ° m O C a) (n CO_ a " 1 U w m N O fOO = O - QO Em Ea) 5 a) a) to u) oo E a¢ `oQ c °- an � °` ca U E o E Ea) ) 1 6. 0 3 . O a @ c o o a) O a E ) E a) L 0 C O E O O N O O a) 0 Z L M C 0 -o .0 O -O a) a 0 N a O n � 0O) Sr ° an c5O Ca -oE a � E ` Na) a) •L 11 • 0 c N 'O a a a) U . co w C a) > a C a) 03 0- O. cn d mC L aL ° o ON 2 as � a N C rnC 3t m3 3a m o � Tr} 0- m2c m2 yo > O > N m Q = N • c c N a) O o o .. 75 a) . N ` r. o c m.0 E Y E -2 a)°) c @ ` m Y>. a) >, a) a) E c c .0 • c c m. o C tm .� m O a l a E m e N tic ac) c rn E o n o N I n a m o co vi- °4E _o an tEs o ° o Qoo Qn E0 0Oaa) o Q -o ¢ too to c o a �d TS P250 U • c o A a c E O 0 • :. U u o O V V V V cO Z M M M (0 N CO • 'O C a) r_ 5 0 ▪ .. Oct > 0 C is .2 L co 0 •_ - c co• > 0 °a °a °a a 0) c -c 0 a a a a c 2 2 2 r c 2 0 w 0 0 0 O w O O 0 0 0) U O Ca Ca 0 cc 2 N 00)) 0) o 0) y 0 > '> 5 > C c > I-• > cC DC K CCa0 Ct Co 0) C U U 'C C O +O•, o in O a U O) 2 )i U- U o m U co C) O c Z2 p • C O O 0 0 0 o 5 m m m 0 0 " O 0 a d' 0 a a a s a 0) L — . > .0 L --c,-. ° co N- O U m U LO-. y 0 N C w c c C U Y a) a) a) .LC.. U 0)•2 r O D C o c L O) N O '� N ` 'EH,: N n Y 0 0 0) C O C O o 2 ° � a- , a o o = `o o co 0 0 0. 0 >>> >0 , vo) .c o n E� o c ° � � aa) -oom � � 0 sa o 0copinc o. a) ovi ° 2 co L _ ° L_ V) ai cu 0 L o .E a) N C Y a) 0) ` NOC 0E . in > L0E m ca _ o `oa) a) ° o -c m o a) 3 0) o 0 a) _o a) c c E v .c E U °) U .N ° u) 0 n N a.-L L O Q N U CI'm C U C ,-C...._ _ @ Q 0 Cr( a) tr. O N 2 E c _T O O) 0 n 0 c rts a) ;w. Oa) n.L-. fo •U '°O @ 3 ° J >.,O 0) 'O N n N '_' CO O N U c 0) CO O) n N 0 sir.0 .E U c a U o a) 0— C o O O C O L U 0) N V°- 0) L O "O N in c M N O) p 0 E 0 0 0 a ° ` 00o E � � � Nm CD o _ 0c a0 aa)ic " acosa, .cUc c al a) c ` a) > 0) u) O > Yo O m j '@ L �N U co) u! n ` j p U O N U co N > r c • E ° U N :5 c U U U U N - n 0) N a) " ° 'p Zc m 'o � a) c � - a; °: �'rn ° cm a' p: E ° °' o-� ,op � d aci `o � w � c O O a' `) 0 0) > c CO C . p c L -O O o N cn N 'C o N c c E c c o o Ty •a) = ° N3 0) co0oa`) oa a D ° O ._ m .oao0 ._ ci a0 u o c 3 m �n .0 rn w w t a' .o a) 3 (I) C °) m 0 ` 0 v o °) m m 0) E 'a r m E•co Q a O `y -- (0 O c N ° C 0 = C 'n U C ` CO a.0 o a) > L 3 O) O) O. C N m al o c 0-2c U TCOO °-- 0E wc ,°-noco 09 N � °na �adco2amc `m ( `oEaEcEm °1iOE o m co � E 0) cc ca ELp ` m: E c '� co -0 ° � m0 • • • • • • CO y o a_ - c-) ") O' °i 5 E co P251 o o A a c E 0 0 • :% U u c c a, o N Z V V' V en M V co Cu V 'C d W a) L V CD CO > 0 C 0 _ CD 0 u 2 >t 0 0 0 0 0 Q C 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 o 0 o O O. a a a a C 2 2 2 2 2 w _ _ _ • _ C �+ 0 0 O O O O 0 CC C a a) N N N C > > > > > a) eu F > X 0_ x ce 0 <h C C w 'C C O w r CO • O Cr U O 22 LL 0 0 m 0 0 : 0 d O) of C -0 I6 'y w C C O O CL co 0v 0 0 0 0 0 0 CU N co O c C N O) •o C a) co • a) a) O -o = c c 0 'O o o `o o o ,C O O O ,C a) > O _c a) -C O C 0 '- a) 0) a) 0 c ' a) co m E 3 .0 ° u � m m . 2 ° o ° 'C.- T� o 0 E.0) O0_ EE0_ 0) 00) o EEoNCa) - ® a Q 0_ 8 E n m a E o E f ° 0 c .? a) 0) 0 0 @ m a U o a 0 ai = v_ E o) a) oD > E > Q2 E o O 0 a) co 0 0 0 0 0) 030 Z20 .0 0" nt ....,o .12 0 .- v LN f0E o ZN ) yN 3 rE To a �0a0iN0 `-- "01> Lo t2 calloc oa) m o o.FT�. 00 ° yaN 0) 0 " -0 B c 0coa) a) 00) w 0 �° 0_� a) o� ;. . 3 .rn c o .0 o .. a ° C r 0 O 0_i dcaa)) - oo -° - ° cmCE ° "- a) N � etELOaa, 0 oa0 0) OO ° o CD 0 o ai ° 3 m _ @ _ ° L 'y -O o 0 0. m > 'Z' co U o m U .o m• � a) 0 � � oY � nooO o ° -t - aa)) ac acivi 0 EEC ° � 0 CD Z O )6 ` a '. O` co N c _ o_ d (° 0. 3 L N y N co O N c - T "6 _O N a) > > N :� N N c 0 = C0_ O. DI CL d 0).B N (° a7 CO Cl D_,=) O O O N a) T.O. N -O E N c '0) U C C T -_ ` ._ O) C .— C N )° .5 u! o c U co y a) $? E O o O) a3 co ya > a_°> 08 CCD oFN � rnaLi o) a�io >: > - rn� ° ? 0 0 > N °m Eo0 ° a ° csu a CD-0gd oEa w= - i— 'u) c )) � -c50000v) -6 ,_ a°0) a? am , mnm 0 2tym Tmrn Ea) >,r E uO) E2 -0y Q m `o -0 .S u) a f) E o f) .g C o_ L° CO (nCC N (0_ 'u) o aci m .0 0 0 D COO) m o m aa)) CO 2 E 0 0 0 '� E w as -0 v0 E N a) d E 2 E .E E . • • • c0 F rnd F. G 0 N co r a) P252 U ` C O m coa 0 E O 0 ▪ U c C C cp O N Z V V V -4- V V N To is '0 C a) .r.. • a) L. r N 0 > O w C O a 0 O ,_ L ._ N 'c 5 > Q Q Q Q Q Q C C C C C C O O O O O O U U U U U U 2 2 2 J 2 c (/) N N N N r- 0 C C C C C C O .a O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) [} 0) o) O) 0) 0) 0) C W C C C C C C E ,43 I > 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO C U w 'C C O O 7 N. c 0 a) O d C) a) C a `O • N • - C C • O O CL 0 0 0 0 0 0 w at .- co o ONO ° CU C m� o m '3 �. `o . ° d daWN N >.� E `m 3EN � aEia N ? � a@i :N � N '� rnC � E U0 � -0 _,a) °' i, p � rn d °- v � o.0 " co c C a) c o m > a) -° m ' _ a) E ` > a.. ° 2 rnin o = O a) 'a E m To CQJ L L O ._ O O O `O m - N C - - C _ L T m d'O >. r00 NN m a an m To (a N � °) o) a ° ° a ` � o � mrmaiE tea= 9= m ° O .(n rEW0 c Loa) a) 0 o L L N «13 co N N m m a) N C a) N O 2 a) C O C ° . O N N C N E .0 ,f/) 3 Y L p_ a) U C O C _ O m N O 3 N m a) m O W L m a _c ° .N o `° Y 0 E E >.,-e 3 O m • ;u mo a c a m a N m N - N 0 m C W C7 Q O a ` N C C L E a) . 0 mmm3m ° oEoc ya0E m cp 0NC ; O ° n oE -Omcmn a i_w • C -O 'O a 0 N L o O j C a) N > O C ° 0) •- v T N a m a) O C f0 'C Z 0) U C c°/) .0 N O x N = >>� C L N N U E ? 3> m >. 0 a) ` ° m N O ` 0 0)Q C a m O O m Y a 2 N O cocoa)O r L E n, U cr a U▪ 2 m U m N -0 0 C d m0 .- 0 .- m o) a 4, 0 o c c a 0 w m O C N U Cam ' U � C C w .� N � m o A Q .N > uj C = woo ° a) > O ui m C a) 3 Q C .- E D r C_ d rn a cC o m O1 C 2 , m ( o) ,Fe aa)) CD 0 2 U m 0 0 (-.) o.- 0 CD ea 0 S o s c 0 m w 2 c co 0 U YD V m -O C a • 0 C > •U) d�' .N E N ^' N N N a) C y iO �+ N N N C D -° U N -0 a o 0 E N I N N C O N u) 3 E U C C C _ a ' co a O U > E Z' C m C N a) Q .— C) t` a) N co a) O N O C a (o a) ` m 00 .5cEoc U - a) coO aaro = mE m rNE8 o r0EC m '� E N m a) 'v !o 11 m U > > U C7 3 a a) 0 m m .0 a) CO I- I- m a) v . co m F O a) m Y r F- , CD U 0 CL a) C • P253 0 U r C . O m a c E O 0 U U C co C O (n Z v v 'Cr N N • CO OS 'O C a) C rill) Y m Oct • 0 • C O 9 a V . • O,_ L C 0 0 2 > Q < Q 0 0 O• 0 0 o O U U U o o > ? ` c 7 in N C G O • 0 C C C O o • as c 0 0 0 0 rn 0 cc 0) o) 0) 0) C L C C C C C F• > 0 0 0 0 0 •O) T CO C 0 C C O 0 O :0 0 CO C 0 a) S• 1i 0 0 0 Q' Q 0 0) • y C ao C C O O a5 � ° m 0 m 0 m . a) -a O a) C a) 0 W -O >,V 0 'O C -O O) 0) 0 0 W C -o L 2 L O -0 W (Q C -0 C 'c 0 C N C a O 0 O C — O O — U — O O O a) N o O U N c U 0 '0 a3 W.Co W W !/) W 2+ E '� E a) N L a) O a) U O) 0 a) 0 co c w i5� 0 U E � O n m � w m c o a) of 0 Q) U G a7 p a) U To U 'o m O N L a3 W -c O ta U a E a) co > O — a) c 'C a T O 2_a 0 0 a) ° u")i m d ° o CO X C C 0 ° a) C Oct = a0i 0) m o E c , C IO a C C � O EE c ° "c` E ° W c o `o a o L o N m °0 3 ' Ol U - N N N L 'a C N '- N w C o co -U -C = O N U p L -O °) U m > `° 3 0 5 -° t U 0 �p c > o).� E m a) a) ° -o c) = `o o -°° t CO • oo) m = Y c _ E28m3 1- co cmL c _ o Ec Z 0-4- 0 O as _O a) a) O 'O W (0 w 0-.m a) 'm C U 3 a c 0 w -C.... a) C c C `0 0) o — u) o Y W — o a c > 0 O o y 0 3 a) a m i o a) -o C N -o o)co _o a c a a�i N c a) 0 U s o p E a 7 V a) 0 c .L. o0) 0 W c C V o a) c 0 5 0 ,_ N ui a) a) a- t W m N W a L O — L O (0 '— O — U W O U a) a) aQ m - 3 co a) > > > m 0 0 .0 a3E W - E - E - N a) aa) a)'.>—. 'C 0 j a) co .0 Q ` 0 CO o N U E 0) m 2 O .0 .°' 0 CO N «a o CO LI a) T Do • i+ C a) C f� p. C. N J a) 'C 0 �_O -j C C 3 a) J W CV) CO- C .1 0O.0 C C _N .NO) C N a 3 E C "6 C TQ W — — — O N O d — C O a > a) L o O a) a) a) a) U . . :'.E Q " a) U ..C E W U 152 U n. .L-. E3 0mCo • • • • • • • o_ 1-4 as m m Cl. c 2 v U) CO- J � N (1) • a) P254 • c o m c E • O 0 U▪ , cc° o V a (n Z (NI N N N CO a) C w a) C r > 0 0 c aca o ,_ L �= " 'c U U 2 > a a N N co C C C co l° co c a a a O• 0 • 0 0 0 E y aa) a a a) a) I= > a it a • CO >,c Cu .c c o . r. o 0 0 o E) U U m 2u_ ¢ m m co a C) a) c 71 a c c O 0 a5 a . w 0 0 o: 2 0 m CO 'O C N 0 ' ' "C O T W N N 0 0 t d C C - m L c U L `� rn c m 't c `o_ a) aa m ° a� co oEa CL N> _ (6 C -p CO " 3 O U3) °— N N Ul C E a.0 a y0 E a s coo) N -a U J co a) x O -o ` .0 U a. p_ m - °? c N �N E w r -oU � m -oo 3 c 3 c4 0 o c -oo `) 0 co 0 3 0 cE a E o c N L ma o . s a m t — ._ c c o > r`° rn a • m 0 1- a rn� c vi c E c « W . CUC0 -0 - rn� ` c > d ° U .c m '° o UniiCND cam 'U N 3 ,� U a) C a) N c0 N m U CO — (n T. c° o U -0 U (a E — m -o .o ° c o c g -=o >i 0r _„moo ° � acs 0) d $ > v ° ,_ o) mcJi a) oo v 0a °) 'c u) as .0 Em a :0o 2 c ,, 3 0 ._,04_, c @c .c 9.2 a) m v oc — coa ma c 3 ow m E 21D -03 L mo rna) .50 a, ti Ccaf00o cc c0 -o in 6o• 0 3 cooc dE @d -0 c) aa)i ` 3 m3 -03oNm o Na @amm � wO c � °o_ llflHfl o c E Uhi c a 4Ifl !0IjlidH } = 3 � E o m U o o_ O °) U E C U �o- N o N a) m a c ro c U any o v u, U N • C) P255 C) C O A c E O 0 U U c cco o v v v v N 2 N N N N co Cu 'O .0 C) W d 0 M d co • 0 C ° 0 L U L O ,_ E > a a 0 0 N U) N U C C C C co cv a) co c a a a a w o o :: 48 45 O O co C w N 3 N 0 j> '5 >> E d co a) a) a) • co O) a C C7 0 C O O CD 0 0 0 0 0 O C• m U — U U a) 2 u. m m m m O1 0 ets a co a) .C_ ao C C C . o O 0.5 cn rew 0 m 0 CO m C N _W 0) 0)= C -0 0 '5 V) C a) L o E u O co O N c >. a) E 0 0 D O O O CO O O - O L C C N .- C ". U Y O E U �' 0 m d 0 0 O N w O N _ O OV) ~ 00 .E a) VCa) O Nm _ O OOEL mE OT ca) 0000ONO o 0) O a) '- 0 7 N ° 0 a) N = C ` ? a ,_ N O) in O = ul C . O N ~• � '> Ca � Eoo0o = Eu Ea) � n m � a) cu vas o � m Pm c aEv ° da) a) s a-Oi3 m `- mc od co c .- ° a m 'z'- a) _ _ - a) m CD o a co m a) o axi .E a _ a) L a Z, ur o 'o ° > ;� o f ra o ~ E N a ° > coo � � c L co m � m E ..- `o EV N '- a) E = c ai- 0 C coo c ° - o m ° cc � oo - cu cr1E o_ a) aCV ` a 0r— a ° w 'gym �_ .N �OOL �La� a) . o _ o w - � .c N c E -- o .c L E E Q ° o a -° o o cn • � � o_LE2a-OC •N 'N � 3 ® v -°o � � - t ) o - ) m - mac cvE06' arEEicC0 o -O E c O c co E O U N > N d-= t "O c CO o a a) 0)O u) L - N 0 O a) O a o o = o m C o c.� ) a) ° 2 o) 0 , ° a) 0 '3 () ° a) -c5 > E tx u, E 0 o - E >. 3 c 2 0 °- E ° Eoco 00 U °) rn a`) D .EE V a _ O a) a) ma ° E >'� ° o ° v co O 0) O 'O ._ o a co U a ` O [a ..L.. O) N a N .O .J C n C U O N C 5 l6 � u $ Eocf6moma) � � o `c"c' � C in' E °' ocE cE u) J3) rn O a «. Y 0 0 0) U c L . o N _- L O 0 C ° 00 N ,- O_V p .0 E 0)D. N O U o 0 0 al co 5p � 0 , . 2 ` c m ° 3 O • o -o „.a) ° ° aj O a> -04, � O � E o o � N m m c E � °i C J a) 0)" c -0 w 0-04 — N O C 'y'. 021 N Ca w U a) a) C al m C 0 a) = rn N VI E U !0 003004-' 20 E ' m = - N O O N E : - a) a) .O 0 -0 a) N (0 C -C C C - > - .0 N N E - x o c . m N L o o m o 0 m E .E w E o a) cw E a) a) o_ 16 O cv a U U O O F 72 a N U O _1 U _ co to Q co E � .c? Cr) ‘D 0- • E M v )n co P256 U c O R c E O O O . c V d co 0 N z N N 'Cr V N a a c a) c w m a) co c O r L v O L Fr_ 2 > a a a Q c c 0 0 N to U U c C > as O c S_ °- C C w G O O O Q O O U U co w a) a) m C M O) T _ C U T-' c O 0• a) (3 U U m Zit -Co- U U co d a . arc B `O c c c c O O 0.2 cc .2 m m m m somas 0 c°)i � a m `o "d .0 c)o ma. -E o m (n o oo ° E c o .E m dY- o c� sw- - = 'mom m E a c nm r L ma mr" a ° >O O m E m m a) 'E a) m m °)a) m ,J a m - - o a) a m `� -.U- 0 C O O N > i_ C O O n O - O f- O _o L .. N a) O m L N O > �? d m .= C 01 .O"d y0 a) a) C 'OO N m O (p O a Z N CO U) ? m a) .m+ ° T • N • - a , a) T- N ill L n ›, a) c4.), c ... cE � � .n ❑ N > c Om �-� � NO � tNOOc• mU m .a c c .o m � o a � o N N N � � o o c a = - CL US, ° N U - E z a) m a) m 'O a) N m O N _Ti m ... a U m O T Z p �) L >m N O ` 2 n m m N to c C 0 CO E a '5 y .o m a -O m a Y c m °'m a m > L _ - )n o o a - omnmuWE0 ° ._ f6 � NE c0 Y Nmc rn° rn morccO1 aa)iv� . 3 O U 3 o O a) I a) .-.' O redacts c a O a) m - a) o . Omc om ° o oo -- Oc Df a`) ' U `o '5 L5 5ccn °-= Oa 4= a) in a 4 c c y d m m @ m o m m �° a, o N •E o m O a) Q .. c tea) rnmo o °- o c E m mNOO °' ° o ° E a) 'o Z c ai m =o `n = y c a) !!) Ea) m n E a) 8 ° D °) c C ° a) o f L ca a - > = m 3 '° E Eta) = awcom > z .- a) o _oN0 00 -E, 00 N P N N Ti L c O OU > T .N L O J U Oa m m N cO y N C m m m j m m cm 0 .at `o _ ° y E c as ,.. z a rn a) w m w :Es Yva .0 Ea a a) E c -O a) c.? ° m > d in m = a) 2 aai ca o vi m' m m - m . d Z E c m c ? n a) n n c _ v o2 ._ d E -O = L a) -o '- U a) ° ,x a) a°i m - a) aoi ° m CCU O .<. nOC ? 'X - ma na) LOE . a) UcE@ C ZN. g — e_ CO > m 0 > E 0 a) n n 'OO m O m L ° a) -°O D a) C p - a) O O N -OO ..LU _c ° a) c E O X O O L O O ° '� Ec a_ ca aE )nEzm � an- UOC� co c....._ o U .00 ..- 0a) ❑ ENC ❑ 2 co - a m 0. �N (O 2 E U N d P257 U c n5 o E r O 2 N U _ c NO. t o) co C E c o O O u- o U « U o .5 0 U C c 07 0 N 0 r-- -4- g a m co Z a V N U co U co . w y cU co C •is K 0 O a a v y C r C O t t lc L .0 L > 0 RI c333 CO Co r N c•) C O w 0 Ca O U L ;I- > U Q Q To 0 c c a 0 o c a c O CO a E C c c v ° a) • o 0 o O •co 0 0 ° N N >' m U 0) 0) 3 > N c C w C C a) w C N E •L > _ > > a) o m Q U F... > 0 0 CC 0 'y L c m L C a co co a . c U m •cc 2' ¢ m (..) it O 7 0 r p• m _U ' a) • )i U U m T o- c m U o o 0 CO> 2 d C U 7 C 0 N = d a) c 0 LL Z 0 O• O O p.2 m U s m o y O N - 0 O •C W f- ce 42 w a a m o t g o • N a) a) a) co o -0 a) • T T o) O a) C 3 — N C ,N N r r C 00, 3 a F 'U O _C _C E a) ° 0 0 E c ca ° 0 L > o -o 0 O 2. Q ° U C � a) N> C L Lil : !: ll !Ii! a)L c oca o Oal co c- ca)O 73 N L U N E N N O co caL a1• aO .q C .. CO y a n -O a) w 'O >, ` d a � 'O -- 0 O y O O o) 0- ID >m T O U , co ca ) N o C c o c c ° p E ° co p m ' n a o - a) D o (.(..)N co a N Uc O ` U N N 'O > N N V N N ® i- L r c . ` $ Eoc � > as .-. 22mo sm ° ° o a a ° U � a � Ec •c• y L .— w .c .E -0 d N ° . - a) 5 cp H Oa O> ° C a) C O . Q ^ C O) m O O O a) O y a"O O y N C Z N .L] — A L _ > tq U• a) w a O O W C a 2 y O a a a) a) °- c - E mo ,O 'o c C = O • C o w y L as U •— N N O a O a L E Q a o w o N U a 3 ° @ o O N O _ � L a L. C — n a O .) c a = L a 0 -O a N T(n - a) y C _ y co it 0 ` a) O v 0 Lc m CW � 0c oEQ • � • o U E ? - YmXEa ~ L c cvpY 0 1I' ' ° ' ! Y ° " I ! 'co �aa ` E FEa) o ° mEo2 o NQ E y cho L s E E> @ cn ca 0� w U W a E ° a) C O C oac nQ �. 1 O p U m T U T a)fn Y Ce 0 a 0 P258 0 c 0 • a 0 U 3 c s 00 0 to" cc cc• 0 0 .� 0 in (0 N- U? c o a N O 0 in in C O a 0 Co E a n 0 i P259 Van der Zwaag, Tabe From: Hund, Geary <geary_hund @fws.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 9:57 AM To: Van der Zwaag, Tabe Subject: Re: Comments - MND General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012, Development Review DRC2014-00127 Dear Tabe, Please note that the first word in the title line should say for, not fro. Thank you, Geary On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Hund, Geary<geary hund(fws.gov> wrote: In Reply Refer To: FWS-SB-1360402-14CPA0415 Tabe Van Der Zwaad Assoicate Planner City of Ranchd Cucamonga Planning Department P.O. Box 807 Ranchg Cuicamoia, CA 91729 September 24, 2014 Subject: Mitigated Negative Declaration fro General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012, Development Review DRC2014-00127 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126, City of Ranchq Cucamonga, San Bemardind County, California Dear Mr. Van Der Zwaai�: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the subject Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed general plan amendment, development review and zoning map amendment for APNs 0229-401--06, 07, 08 and 09, dated August 20, 2014 and received by our office on August 21, 2014. The project is located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Service does not agree with the finding in Biological Resources Section 4a of the Initial Study for the project, Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. This finding was based on a Biological Technical Report dated July, 2013 which concluded that the project site does not contain desirable habitat for special status species. We do not agree with this finding because the site contains Delhi fine sands which are potentially suitable habitat for the federally listed Delhi sands flower-loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminates abdominalis, DSF). Development of the site could result I P260 in adverse effects to DSF if present. In addition to the site containing Delhi fine sands, there are historic occurrence records of DSF within 2.8 miles. When a site contains potentially suitable habitat for DSF, i.e., Delhi fine sands, the Service considers two consecutive seasons of surveys for DSF with negative results to be necessary to determine presumptive absence. An exception may be made if a habitat assessment is conducted by a permitted DSF biologist which provides conclusive evidence to the Service that the site no longer contains potentially suitable habitat. We recommend that DS6 surveys or a habitat assessment (if appropriate for the site) be conducted to determine if the project may affect the subspecies and that the results be provided to the Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office for our review. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the PIN_. If you have any questions regarding this email, please contact me. Sincerely, Gear Geary W. Hund Fish and Wildlife Biologist 760-322-2070 x209 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Palm Springs Office 777 E. Tahguiti Canyon Way, Suite 208 Palm Springs, California 92262 Geary W. Hund Fish and Wildlife Biologist 760-322-2070 x209 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Palm Springs Office 777 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 208 Palm Springs, California 92262 2 P261 m a i EGO LOCI C A L SG , E GE October 27, 2014 John Burroughs • Commerce Construction Co., L.P. 13191 Crossroads Parkway North,6th Floor City of Industry, CA 91746 SUBJECT: Results of a Habitat Suitability Evaluation, ±6.6-acre CSF Project Site, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California Dear John: This letter report presents findings of a reconnaissance-level survey conducted to generally evaluate the suitability of a ±6.6-acre site to support the federally-listed endangered Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis-herein DSFF). Introduction The site is regionally located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City), San Bernardino County, California (Plate 1). Specifically, the project site is located south of Mission Park Drive, west of Buffalo Avenue, east of Richmond Place, and north of 4'h Street. The site occurs on the"Guasti" USGS 7.5-minute topographic map, Township 1 South, Range 6, West, Section 18 (Plate 2). Plate 3 provides an aerial photograph of the site. Projects proposed in the area that contain potentially suitable habitat to support sensitive biological resources such as the DSFF must demonstrate to reviewing agencies that potential project- related impacts to sensitive biological resources are avoided or minimized. In order to meet the environmental documentation and review requirements, potentially occurring sensitive biological resources must be addressed to demonstrate the applicant's conformance to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the federal Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended. As such, this report is intended to provide biological information to the applicant and reviewing agencies in support of the environmental review process. As a federally listed endangered species, the DSFF is protected under the Act. As such, federal law prohibits"take"of listed species. The term "take"means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,wound, kill, trap, capture or collect, or attempt to engage in any such conduct. In some cases, habitat modification can constitute prohibitive "take". A section 10(a) permit is required for projects where a determination of "take" is likely to occur during a proposed non-federal activity. If the project were to require a federal permit (e.g., USACE 404 permit), the federal agency issuing the permit would consult with the Service to determine how the action may affect the DSFF under Section 7 of the Act. The Service routinely reviews environmental documentation for proposed development projects in the area, and as such, would recommend that any impacts to sensitive biological resources be adequately addressed and mitigated pursuant to the Act and CEQA. Due to the inherent limitations of unseasonal or habitat-based data, definitive conclusions regarding the actual presence or absence of DSFF cannot be made in this evaluation. Accordingly, this report is intended to provide the applicant with general information relative to the potential occurrence of DSFF based solely on the nature of habitat present. • 601 GLADE DRIVE • SANTA PAULA, CA 93060 ♦ TEL 805.921.0583 ♦ FAX 805.921.0683 G S EMAIL:SCAMERON @ECOSCIENCESINC.COM 1 P262•,mar " it ,1 'mem - �,m,-";, •i , r• rr:"�t t riles . , �� ' .,, . %.*:is, rei ri.jirp- .11=rm.,banigliti Mar ,," i W 4 -'"P '681" 4 WIT litilEalp OE i 4, J*1sIF'i. sI ,.. < ",girl i►' II 0 R.4 .7,...,A4 'AMIE c .w lin Em. : - _r_i:EsElir . -=gzsam t rte»■ N ;. .• Survey Area �� ;, . , v:. neon _ � . a....,:- 11, "Mi.- ,HM.' :21tIllir- - 'Ei'... M. 1 . HIB t fall ars ii0.11k in!'" , 1 - "...mon .1111iummiwi minemigAxi_ 41.4.•••=9.7%.----iwinummit AmirsimminiaL ,.��eg sf ... . . t: ... sm. moor-+� - _' ' NV MEI --..-._- :- - .,-. _.....-Im... MINIM .A11 7 PAill a ..,il ininia we., r_i__,,:ii. ,:, 'C, RIM I ■1 ,,,, El � ` HI , r 11EMIP.A1„, - •:, .r •ail_ ou r rt.,-. iri. . tali gee ! M ,� ; . . ..- 1 Ala.-3-- Hi -vr.411114 11,A.111111 ' Illifffird: ' ' 1m Ern gi . ),,,,.. Hwy ._ sm.. S JIItOf1; � rR 0 I le 'z,,, . ,,....... imp. ,I EMI A 11 71.17NIM=I 1 67:15 -*I) plate l ECOLOGICAL SCIENCE S Regional Site Location October 2014 6-acre CSF Project Site P263 E♦, SitL+JI..M $,s-,«N ♦ I'•YW G .u,a,.. p. ,l..„.._ YTF.M♦fi . .ASS....4,a..„,,4,;,...i !'i4,,,.,,♦e Ae . k!3IR4a - = 34 AfaFf•WrdkT�C'. 5tatRYS- 1,. . _ : 4., ,fa't 1,4,,,,-,...... f....... ,r40.4lwy"14.4 t••••:r.;,,,,,..^-,,15.4.4,4,44.41[41.11.4.4"'" P..4.94..y.:x {{ 1�-4Ntt4,40,41' °♦!R',W°. "'€+, ' q"�i$v,,,..4 - Mf' "fMY' `•4*.r44+# ! 'N. * i #{ +c"441 +'.rV.as.f.�'trf ..,.n «sro. ao a, %eLw14.4ittw+4fwu-+5,rl a6.i :x4490 .40._ - f.:' !'.+1y47Fr'i'r. °§ S,l6s+x.r^C' w?.► - " as� ,f ° ` �// :.K�.f��r+rrs3 t a ...+s�. u+..,lt. im=u,.,st:... F I{-.r^.t'' - +..1,41 *;.04 aK�cMM+.1,4tAisP;' , .Rd,^ 1.16101....,*Aft.,♦N9ORILS+♦S 4,01• .AMv:- • .�m,"it*i�,ia,4'x�. '$•1c:04«j'ntiyk= f"A" hrelik.-/UMcs!1il x'uR'k Nirtto4W7F. U- * 1 1�.'AOw%VSe-i'w k#MP.}`✓s:4shMS.f+..41.411••RM04•••.RWE3Ar8 44,410 44.•1+� 4d y�fiV` '°M41�40+• •...NA r1*~,• .�4rc ay 4.44.4,0'11'70 K axle-‘a°•R;l L4f4IaaF040404- &Y #'a e MrM,LVR4 2.4t,albi44V4A 1 ftrio.rns roMUt... .*4-1.•ais.•.,.Y _. .",..i1.1-4. tt .. b -P...b }� , ..�. = === w=Z=la=�.,== .=.=i - ►) .'' a4rr..i.fa3. ! tip; W 22 4. 0:. ...+3hb,•44- . 8.m".,-...:r+,.-,r.�ar..tcn�F�kr...,. 1te w.,. ♦ .,,Vsla..cs,w:r-u,d.�a 1 •M.4VI♦ Fi ai-xi"c+N.F i i' .. - ', 14-~01004-. $4441444,41644. t.#41- `" RA!.11 L4i.:+"�_*_•.Fao.41....rw. t.r..#.'..,.1.004.4..,..,- .r..4c4..., •- •4i of-1lOMO■b(MslE..�:' +`oE'RF: 'b•+ NN3^Mn I V " /i-N 1KA...0 . ,+n.. ..........,...M...„4„hts - +iRi ..M .y44•v4 .F 444•41e.^k*•••10.'a.«.mnFrwrtr..,aw••, w;441414...4..1", esr..h.,4,4•,,• ,, , ^V.4. t4 *••• ±e+!,1..+..ax. ..w.rou. 'i!N�w,r,. ttsv,,A.:04 4••••'cxsn+M. tw,.ew 1 `+s. ..s.a w.t.' •4, -:x-t, - --f'C' K./ .*,,r-4°'.s.€.? *Ot lecitniit,AfilliKtOt Na Viid011,4141ftilend. ,-.jo w 4+r4-e.. 44, '-.ar•Ic 4 .crt3ir/a.e... .�► ..,#.,o,.ea�✓ i Ma..ta K!,�i.*..� +eywe..++r a,{ .,. 1 ..dL14047- '.� y•.•" .a i. ••!.!aMlt.4i1Rl....Pe •A:y}1-4+.1n.'�FA.C. ! ,,V,,N L.v.MALT-444- [( . .s. . .....•.ui r••+v.`. - • _ ,+15.+40 t-�+Mt+ • w.• - •41•02•11.-•01'..W.414,..• ,.+,+r.,...a.re .se..a i4 »..O.4. mom' ,yp 1' — -4 rc 'R'•4Y.o'+°."4=ids-., I..•'si'*.I.1 -+.x .�w+'.k,-* .. Gt'4'3 #0.44 448` 4frt .srRK1a*- ' °,':41rt k44110i%',, I1W mf's'+r-. ,r.*.'iaa r1s",ta ,A^-,, r 4,11.,•''' s j .. w,tta,.e.4 *ed,J+rsx a w itH{YS M' f"v..S6, ,,. i...,„,,."+w ...10,1#11},4, - V �r�iM1 .1,gp010.W.V... ,. xk1 t s a-dr�ae+t-ar,.xli..asc4n'^c dts.a .. Pk T� - - n a ' ., ,l A iv ell . ' iA:. f ri ht's - s5 +�i�48.1in.s v .s v .+•« r-A.A i..iYt" ''z it .t C; v4',tq r4 1.4,444 I,.a�s ,.-s11J..�#vi 4.450.44..11 ssr:,. 14,10.0 4'+4 404,!'M 1444,ii..'.-JIM�IF w �� `S`f{•n+WBM�F 4if..1 0.3t.w.• - I -wF,f71.Y.4+?d 44 . . III♦ , 4.40.:. I! „�..4..: . f41.*..�:4. . - 4.t, .1.ww!..410 Y.f�nK --s,IrrsrF.eF 3Mk. sILMe/4►wt1'CaM/msi.- fM,`... ,l.lye;.-,n-s�d i,,,..-,W..'M,.ad-'w� n4.t ►•t.0[. -.,4,5V.1,xf L sT....,.il#4t•, t '-o- # . +' 1 •u*." 10.* 4.-.tnau991t ,i.***fb60A - =...<+.-•.434x.. 1t ‘‘ nResery - .. 1 i# I \ ! ----%\! \\ 1 It 4. � 1 at / - 4.14417-6:4, • = Study Area Boundary plate 2 ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES USGS Topographic Vicinity Map October 2014 6-acre CSF Project Site P264 _ - ilk rut . ; 1 0 1-1- ti d rr �1+• U iryi 1 :fat,'Idt�.i i 0/�J t . - - _ •I Y -kill L -iii. , C U - a 4 " • 1.1 - C(.314."7") i - - - .......- - Yf _ ` n _` CO I w4 4 '31ii,tilidi.lt. , 4". Imo._ . .-- }dd,!* [ +ay h _ _ i 3.r a 1°4 w !•k, I: 1 . r rt .• • :I lr-it . . . . . at • .-- ` _ ..• .� 'U • 3 r. i yip .. , . Eli, ..le ›. : a 1 '..,flit-it i i .....". ..d - -- le •i - : 41 to .4 . $ i1 .- 1• 16 .. t ) 2.,........_...,.._7_ ,....... cp J akE �' .Y. .... ,••••• .,. ..7 } -0 +4 II ' . fill- 1 lai a' _ - r Y _ . pu O;.:31,.. - - i V., r. .1 It• ','"'","7'7 I 1 t ' �W o, tU O�1^�� i °s—ate 1111 -. r' i . ,y t . V • Wa P265 Selected Species Overview The Service listed the DSFF as an endangered species on September 23, 1993. This species is only known to occur in association with Delhi sand deposits (USFWS 1997), primarily on twelve disjunct sites within a radius of about eight miles in the cities of Colton, Rialto, and Fontana in southwestern San Bernardino and northwestern Riverside counties. However, recent survey data (1997-03) indicates that DSFF occur in low numbers in Ontario, and also in sub-optimal habitat conditions. The DSFF is restricted to the Colton Dunes, which covers approximately 40 square miles. More than 95 percent of the formerly known habitat has been converted to human uses or severely affected by human activities, rendering it apparently unsuitable for occupation by the species(Smith 1993, USFWS 1997 in Kingsley 1996). General Habitat Characteristics Areas containing sandy substrates with a sparse cover of perennial shrubs and other vegetation constitute the primary habitat requirements for Rhaphiomidas flies (USFWS 1997). Potential habitat for the DSFF is typically defined as areas comprised of sandy soil (Delhi series) in open areas commonly dominated by three indicator plant species: California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), California croton (Croton californica), and telegraph weed (Heterotheca grandiflora). Annual bur-sage (Ambrosia acanthicarpa), Rancher's fireweed (Amsinckia menziesii), autumn vinegar weed (Lessingia glandulifera), sapphire eriastrum (Eriastrum sapphirinum), primrose (Oenothera sp.), and Thurber's buckwheat (Eriogonum thurben) are also commonly present at occupied DSFF sites. In addition, insect indicator species such as Apiocera and Nemomydas are also typically associated with occupied DSFF habitat. It is also important to note that the presence or absence of indicator species does not determine presence/absence of DSFF. Rather, these indicator species exhibit a strong correlation to habitats occupied by DSFF. A gradient of habitat suitability exists for DSFF, composed of varying degrees of both natural and artificial conditions. Federal DSF Recovery Units/Core Reserves Subregional areas encompassing smaller areas known to be inhabited by the DSFF or encompassing areas that contain restorable habitat for the DSFF have been grouped into three Recovery Units(RUs)by the Service based on geographic proximity, similarity of habitat, and potential genetic exchange(USFWS 1997). The subject site is located within an area designated as the Ontario RU. The Ontario RU historically contained the largest block of the Colton Dunes; however, most lands in this RU have been converted to agriculture, or developed for commercial and residential projects (USFWS 1997). The Ontario RU contains several areas that currently support DSFF, and additional areas have been proposed for restoration in the DSFF Recovery Plan. The occupied and/or potentially restorable habitat in the RUs includes only those areas that, at a minimum, contain Delhi Series soils. Further, RUs do not include residential and commercial development, or areas that have been otherwise permanently altered by human actions (USFWS 1997). DSFF will continue to exist in the Ontario RU only with land conservation, a cessation of current habitat-degrading land management practices and recreational uses, and/or a restoration or natural reversion of ecologically damaged lands back to an ecological community typical of Delhi sands formations. Potentially suitable habitats remaining in the Ontario RU are highly fragmented, and as such, the establishment of a permanent long-term reserve in this RU is currently unresolved. While many degraded sites are currently unsuitable to support DSFF, DSFF have been recorded on certain properties that have been heavily disturbed in the past (e.g., previously graded and/or scraped sites where a cessation of disturbance-related land uses have occurred such that a degree of natural conditions now occur). Accordingly, DSFF may persist on, or disperse to, certain properties that have not been exposed to recurring and/or recent land disturbances. These previously disturbed properties may be important for future preservation of the species in the region. In addition, individual DSFF have been recorded in areas generally considered unsuitable to support this taxon, and with no apparent connectivity to occupied DSFF habitats. DSFF Habitat Suitability Evaluation Commerce Construction Co., LP. • October 27, 2014 Page 5 P266 Additional data will be needed on reproduction and mortality rates, dispersal, and habitat variables before further refinement of RU boundaries, development of alternative RU preserve designs, and analyses of population can be made(USFWS 1997). Until such data is obtained, the highest priority will be to protect existing populations of the DSFF (USFWS 1997). To achieve downlisting, areas containing occupied and/or restorable habitat and dispersal corridors need to be evaluated relative to the extent of distribution patterns necessary to support secure populations. Sites to be protected should be selected based on habitat needs of adults and larvae, and willingness of landowners to participate in recovery efforts(USFWS 1997). Several "Core Reserve Areas" have been initially identified by the Service, but to our knowledge, the actual extent of the proposed reserve areas has not been finalized. Focused DSFF Survey Guidelines The Service prepared Presence/Absence Survey Guidelines for the DSFF in December 1996 (USFWS 1996), with revisions in April 2004. In general, the guidelines maintain that in order to more fully determine the presence or absence of DSFF such that the results are acceptable to the Service, a survey following these guidelines must be conducted. The guidelines require that surveys be conducted in all areas containing Delhi sands twice weekly(two days per week)during the single annual flight period from July 1 to September 20. However, at the discretion of the Service, survey guidelines may be modified depending upon individual site circumstances (e.g., highly degraded sites that don't support constituent elements of potential DSFF habitat or early seasonal emergence periods). During the environmental review process, recommendations to perform focused DSFF surveys are evaluated by reviewing agencies on a site-by-site basis. Methodology Literature Search Documentation pertinent to the biological resources in the vicinity of the site was reviewed and analyzed. Information reviewed included: (1)the Federal Register listing package for the federally listed endangered DSFF; (2) literature pertaining to habitat requirements of DSFF; (3) the California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB 2014) information regarding sensitive species potentially occurring on the site for the "Guasti"and surrounding USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle maps, and (4)review of available reports from the general vicinity of the project site(e.g., Glenn Lukos Associates 2013). 2014 Habitat-Suitability Evaluation Ecological Sciences conducted a reconnaissance-level field survey on the subject site to evaluate potential habitat for DSFF on October 11, 2014. The survey was conducted by Scott Cameron, Principal Biologist of Ecological Sciences, Inc. Mr. Cameron holds a current federal permit to conduct focused survey for this species (TE-808642-5). Ecological Sciences biologists have observed numerous DSFF in the field since 1995, and have extensive experience conducting both focused surveys and habitat evaluations for this sensitive taxon. Ecological Sciences is well versed with the biotic characteristics of a range of habitats occupied by DSFF, as well as other sensitive wildlife species potentially occurring in the area. The site was examined on foot by walking a series of meandering transects across the subject property. As mentioned, the primary objective of the one-day field visit was to generally evaluate the site's potential to support DSFF. Dominant plant species and other habitat characteristics present at the site were identified to assess the overall habitat value. Weather conditions included clear skies, 1-3 breezes, and an ambient temperature of 82-84°F. Existing Biological Environment The study area is characterized as a highly degraded and disturbed vacant site dominated by a dense coverage of non-native ruderal plant species(grasses and forbs). The area has been exposed to various anthropogenic disturbances such as mowing and discing (weed abatement). Debris dumping is evident on the site. Surrounding land uses include commercial development on all sides. Plates 4a-4b photographically illustrate existing conditions. DSFF Habitat Suitability Evaluation Commerce Construction Co.,L.P. October 27, 2014 Page 6 P267 .. t 4 ,,, Xr X 0°s'3 riF aq 4 0° Y• ^ F 4 , • .rte: : ' q r M1 • View to west i i f: :. $ - S 1 t _ i _. ' �. ,_ . _,.r..;r s - rc yH. �' 5�..., v .. • View to east �% : plate 4a.!.4.4) . ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES - October 2014 Site Photographs 6-acre CSF Project Site P268 • r , . b L r'ti+i*'t,�p^«.,x.F, ra..., ..:;r mss*• X74 • • View to north e3 - •"mt 4 xa"s 4t•. 7�'* iL� .�'.�?�.+.14t 1,.,'14''''A L�,�.e • y 'r .rra$0;y"`' ,+ "'�' �Fw. -'+ .,, '; r , Fry, y�,,�,r- "✓ Y ,+cak;1.' rs _ ,fir •a •..-- x r _ y�r '° tom`.0.44: r� i4 —:;-.7..„---Ir 14----. .--:-*7'-.;*--- ` s y • ✓- WP .S W. 1 •,'''.1 :, , °'t. ".,,#:,s �- ?'k n, • '"""Tf .,t '' a4,y ' + Vi a View to south _I It plate 4b ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES, Site Photographs October 2014 6-acre CSF Project Site P269 Vegetation Ruderal plants recorded on site included various non-native grasses and weedy species such as (oxtail chess(Bromus madritensis spp. rubens), ripgut grass(Bromus diandrus), filaree(Erodium spp.), Russian thistle (Salsola tragus), and mustards (Brassica and Sisymbrium spp.). Native plant species recorded included Rancher's fireweed, dove weed (Eremocarpus setigerus), bur-sage, and telegraph weed. In addition, a small patch of remnant California buckwheat is also present on site. Vegetation coverage averaged about 90 percent. . General Soils Analysis/Soil Conservation Map Review A review of soil maps prepared for the area by the Soil Conservation Service(SCS 1980)indicate that the subject site is located within an area mapped as containing Delhi fine sand (Db). However, various long- standing anthropogenic site disturbances may have altered portions of the site's soil characteristics in ways currently unsuitable to support DSFF. A general surface soils analysis was conducted due to the close association of DSFF to mostly open, sandy friable soils. Soils were generally compacted throughout the study area with some gravel assimilated. In general, soil conditions are not consistent with potential DSFF habitat. Discussion DSFF have relatively narrow habitat requirements that are determined by appropriate plant species and open sand as defining characteristics (Kingsley 1996). The presence of Delhi soils appears to be the most determinative factor of whether an area can provide suitable DSFF habitat. Delhi sands constitute the primary component of a complex ecosystem. A variety of microhabitat characteristics generally constitute potential DSFF habitat (e.g., Delhi soils, vegetation composition, soil chemistry, topography, • percent vegetative cover, frequency of non-native plant species, exposure to disturbances, etc.). However, it is widely acknowledged that a gradient of habitat suitability exists for DSFF, composed of varying degrees of natural and artificial conditions. Comprehensive DSFF population data is generally lacking and key factors regulating DSFF populations have not been fully identified. As such, whether this taxon would persist over a long-term basis in less than ideal conditions is currently unknown. While the aforementioned microhabitat conditions are considered optimal/essential to support DSFF, DSFF sometimes occur in areas not typically considered suitable for this taxon. Although individual DSFF have been recorded from sites supporting mostly ruderal, non-native vegetation, most known DSFF- occupied sites contain areas, or are adjacent to areas, of relatively undisturbed exposed patches of friable, sandy soils in association with selected native plant species. History of DSFF colony sites indicates that previously disturbed (by grading, agriculture, etc.) Delhi sands formations may revert over a few years (through erosion, aeolian processes, fossorial animal activity, and natural vegetative succession) back to conditions capable of supporting DSFF populations. However, these natural processes are dependent upon a cessation of disturbance-related land uses, which prevent the natural reestablishment of a more characteristic Delhi sand community(associated with potential DSFF habitat). There is no apparent connectivity to the subject site from the nearest known (to us) DSFF population (±3.O miles south of the site) due to the presence of existing commercial development that entirely surrounds the site. While this species likely has the capability of dispersing over relatively large distances of seemingly unsuitable habitats under certain circumstances, it would be reasonable to assume (based on our current knowledge of the species) that the likelihood of DSFF dispersing to the subject site from the nearest known off-site occupied site would be low despite the fact that variables such as the length, width, and structural characteristics of dispersal corridors are not fully understood. Accordingly, the subject site would not be considered a viable property for preservation or restoration due to its geographic location. isolation from undeveloped areas, and surrounding land uses which have fragmented potential DSFF habitat in the area. DSFF Habitat Suitability Evaluation Commerce Construction Co., L.P. October 27, 2014 Page 9 P270 Conclusion Based on results of the October 2014 habitat suitability evaluation, existing conditions present at the site are not consistent with those known or expected to support DSFF. No exposed natural or semi-natural open areas with unconsolidated wind-worked granitic soils or dunes are present. Exposure to recurring substrate disturbances (e.g., discing, mowing, grading) have substantial negative effects on potential DSFF habitat and may also prevent potentially suitable DSFF microhabitat soil conditions from developing. Substrate conditions are not consistent with those most often correlated with potential DSFF habitat. Although a few native plant species are present that are often associated with potential DSFF habitat, the context in which these species occur (e.g., within highly disturbed site conditions in an isolated environment) does not constitute a native plant community most commonly associated with potential DSFF habitat. Under current conditions, the site would generally be considered prohibitive to DSSF occupation. The underlying soil environment appears to be the most definitive factor of whether an area could potentially support DSFF. Quality of Delhi soils present within the study area was rated for its potential to support DSFF. The area mapped as Delhi soils was visually inspected and rated based on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the best quality and most suitable habitat in the biologist's judgment: 1. Soils dominated by heavy deposits of alluvial material including coarse sands and gravels with little or no Delhi sands and evidence of soil compaction. Unsuitable. 2. Delhi sands are present but the soil characteristics include a predominance of alluvial materials (Tujunga Soils). Very Low Quality. 3. Although not clean, sufficient Delhi sands are present to prevent soil compaction. Some sandy soils exposed on the surface due to fossorial animal activity. Low Quality. 4. Abundant clean Delhi sands with little or no alluvial material or Tujunga soils present. Moderate abundance of exposed sands on the soil surface. Low vegetative cover. Evidence of moderate degree of fossorial animal activity by vertebrates and invertebrates. Moderate Quality 5. Sand dune habitat with clean Delhi sands. High abundance of exposed sands on the soil surface. Low vegetative cover. Evidence (soil surface often gives under foot) of high degree of fossorial animal activity by vertebrates and invertebrates. High Quality Based on the above ratings and existing site conditions,the study area would be considered Unsuitable for DSFF. In view of the site's highly disturbed and isolated condition, exposure to recurring surface disturbances, and analyses of correlative habitat information from a wide range(e.g., relatively disturbed to more natural habitats) of occupied DSFF habitats in the region, the±6.6-acre site does not likely contain habitat suitable to support or sustain a viable DSF population.Therefore, no impacts to DSFF are expected and no mitigation is required for less than significant impacts under CEQA. DSFF Habitat Suitability Evaluation Commerce Construction Co.,L.P. October 27, 2014 Page 10 P271• I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this biological survey, and that the facts, statements, and information.presented herein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, Sincerely, Ecological Sciences, Inc. Scott D. Cameron Principal Biologist • C DSFF Habitat Suitability Evaluation Commerce Construction Co., L.P. October 27, 2014 Page 11 P272 References California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDOB). 2014. Computer Reports for the "Guasti" and surrounding USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle maps. Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. 2013. Biological Technical Report for the CSF Project Located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County,California. July 22. Kingsley, Kenneth J. 1996. Behavior of the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (Diptera: Mydidae), a Little Known Endangered Species. Ann. Entomol. Soc.Am. 89(6): 883-891. Soil Conservation Service. 1980. Soil Survey of San Bernardino County, Southwestern Part, California. U.S. Department of Agriculture. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Determination of Endangered Status for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly. U.S. Department of Interior. Federal Register, 58(183):49881-49887. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1996. Interim General Survey Guidelines for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly. December 30. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1997. Delhi sands Flower-loving Fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis) Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland,OR. 51 pp. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. General Survey Guidelines for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly. April 30. • DSFF Habitat Suitability Evaluation Commerce Construction Ca,LP. October 27, 2014 Page 12 P273 ea fry.. United States Department of the Interior riA... ..F-- FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Pacific Southwest Region. 2800 Cottage Way,Suite W-2606 Sacramento,Caiitomia- 95815-1846. NOV 1 `l_ it IN REPLY REFER TO: FSR+RLcoray Dear Perrnittee: Enclosed is your U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recovery permit issued under section l0(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act(ESA),. 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., and its implementing regulations. Please refer to the permit number in all correspondence and reports concerning permit activities. Engagement in any activity pursuant to this permit constitutes understanding and acceptance of the Special Terms and Conditions attached to your permit.. By accepting this permit and conducting activities,authorized by it, you are agreeing to adhere to the attached terms and conditions. Failure to meet permit terms and conditions could result in ESA section 9 take violations,or suspension/revocation.of this permit: Please be aware that some species named in:your recovery permit may also be listed under various State.Endangered.Species Acts or otherwise be of special concern to the States As such, activities affecting those species may not be conducted without first obtaining,the appropriate. State permits. Federal permits do not supersede State authorizations.. If you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact Daniel Marquez at 760-431-9440:. Thank you. - Sincerely, i ' End send Species Divis on ' f Enclosures TAKE PRIDE`± 6 1NAMERICA � -.--.. P274 t1FP ARTAIEN1 OF I He:*.s rf hIJL L.5.rS[tA G R'ILDU1 tRL,tCC \GTH00.11Y•SiAtti TES' 1_ IOPSC 153901. FEDERAL FISH.AND WILDLIFE PERMIT ccsci=i::a; iEEiULiilONC' 30 CFR I;21 L PEAAIt1T[E O CFR I;3: SCOTT D.CAMERON SO CFR 13 dte ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES.INC. 601 GLADE D!t' ptaaER SANTA PAULA.CA;3030 TES0a2J2-a AMENDMENT U.S A. %RENEW ABLE :.uv COPY � YES 1'E4 o E Nu a.EFFECTIVE - LCPIR£5 li93:01} I I ur:9R S!COM AND TITLE GFPWNCIP AL OFFICER•:J•!i,imrnl. 1.TYPE of PEAAD F NATIVE ENDANGERED&THREATENED SP.RECOVERY-E it T it LOC;TIOS t;'HERE.aLTIORIZFDACTN'IT'SLAY RE CONDUCTED, ON LANDS SPE[Fe WITHIN Tt'EATTACHED SPECIAL TWOS AND CNNOR10PS • 11.to o;TIoss p%D.0 ThCRIEATIONk A.ti EPAL',ADIt IONS SET tilLIIA)L.EP.ARI DIUF;1ciR V. aNUSPEC..FTC CONDI1N1S 5 COM&INFO IS FEDERAL REGLLA BONS L1TED IN SLO(A ti`AIPT£:ARE HEREBY AIDE A %RE OF I HIS PERMIT. ALL MIN I IIES At1HONZED HEWN AICii SECAPSID OCT IS ACCORDUIIH AND NCR THE A.EPOSES D£SRIBED IN:HI.°PPLC&TLOC K am't1uacoNtINCED AVAUDITY.'011 RINE%ALOP THIS?MOT USN'WM TOCO•et LIE AND TIMELY COVYLLA4V EIA I I H.LLL APPLiG+KE COiNDI/IO ALNCLI DING TIE' nL60 OF ALL REOCIRED IRORALATION AND REPORTS a THE VALIDITY OP THISPFRUIT IS ALSOCONDITIONED UPON STRICT OSSERVA NCR°FALL APPLICADLE FOREIGN,STATE.LOC V..TRIBAL.OROTHER FEDERAL kr: C,VALID CDR L'•d SY P£RNIITIEE NAMED.AaOVE: a Further condtone of authorization we contained in the attached Special Terns and Condisona. Et •WDItIO-t%L DI14• ♦I'r inoI[IT:oc,it 40%pi ... S REPO3TI%O Rk✓ZL':EEME VT1 ANNUAL REPORT DUE 1/31 See perrrit conditions for further reporting ieg*aerents. LSR'ED81' TITLE Di:E i l ..„.":774),..-6---7 ENDANGERED rECIES DIVISION CHIEF 11503'2013- P275 Fag; lof9 TE-808242-3 SPECIAL TERMS'AND CONDITIONS Scott D. Cameron !. This permit was previously issued on April 2; 2009:, The terms and conditions set forth in. that permit are hereby superseded by this amendment. 2. Acceptance of this permit serves as evidence that the pennittee understands and agrees to abide by the"General Conditions for Native Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. Species Permits," 50 CFR Part 13, 50 CFR 17.22 (endangered wildlife), and/or 50 CFR 17.32 (threatened wildlife), as applicable(copies attached). 3. The permittee Must have all ocher applicable State and Federal permits prior to the commencement of activities authorized by this permit: In addition: this permit does not authorize access to Federal, Tribal, State. local government,or private lands as it is the responsibility of the permittee to obtain land owner permission prior to commencing permitted activities.on such lands. 4. The permittee is authorized to take(harass by survey) the coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica), take(survey by pursuit) the Delhi Sands flower- loving fly(Rapliiomidas ternrinatus abdominalis),and take(survey, capture, handle and release)the Pacific pocket mouse(Perognat ltus.longimembris-pacificus)..the arroyo toad (arroyo southwestern)(:dnatyrus californicus(Bttfo nricroscapluts c.l), and the California red-legged frog(Rana draytonii(R.aurora d.)) in conjunction with surveys and population monitoring for the purpose of enhancing their survival, as specified in the permittee's February 28, 2013, permit renewal request,in accordance with the conditions- stated below. 5. Permitted activities are restricted to the following geographic areas in southern California: a. For the coastal California gnatcatcher(gnatcatcher): Los Angeles. Riverside. San Diego, Orange, San Bernardino,and Ventura. Counties.. b. For the Pacific pocket mouse(pocket mouse): San Diego, Los Angeles, and Orange Counties. c. For the southwestern arroyo toad(arroyo toad): Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego,Orange, San Bernardino.Ventura; Santa Barbara. San.Luis Obispo. Monterey. �._. P276 • Page 2 of 9 TE-808242-3. d. For the California,red-legged frog(frog): Los.Angeles,Riverside;San Diego, Orange.and San Bernardino (south of the Los. Angeles.Natinnat Forest)Counties. e. For the Delhi Sands flower-loving Ely(fly): San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. Notifications.to conduct activities pursuant to this permit at specific locations within the; above referenced areas must:be submitted in,writing to the Recovery Permit Coordinator of the appropriate Fish and Wildlife Office(FWO)of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service- (Service) 1.5 days prior to conducting such activities. The appropriate FWO is determined to be within thepre-detined geographic regions'whete the activity is to take place as follows:. For areas from Santa Cruz County south to Los Angeles County north of the San Gabriel Mountains in the Angeles National Forest, and north and west of the Santa Monica pier,contact the Ventura,Fish and WildlifeOffice(VFWO), 2493 Portola Road, Suite 13;Ventura-California 93001-(telephone: 805-6444766: fax; 305-644-3958). For areas from Los Angeles County including;and.south of the San Gabriel Mountains inahe Angeles:NationatForest, andsouth and east of the Santa Monica'pier to San Diego County, including areas within.the Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office(PSFWO)jurisdiction(when applicable);contact the Carlsbad Fish'and Wildlife Office(CFWO). 2177 Salk Avenue;Suite 25Q. Carlsbad;California92008 (telephone: 760-43.1-9440). Notifications shall include:(a)an explanation of the purpose of the study and a clear description-of methods;including the names of field personnel;,theextent of area surveyed, and the number and dates of surveys; (b) the number of individuals proposed to. be captured and/or collected;(c) a map (at a minimum, a 1:24,000 scale,U.S.Geological Survey(USGS)topographic map)depleting the location.of the survey site(s);(d)the- assessor's parcel number(.APNN) for the site(if possible); and(c) geographic information system(GIS)'data depicting the survey site or global positioning system(GPS) coordinates(if possible). Information may be submitted electronically if pre-arranged' with the Recovery Permit Coordinator. For locations within the jurisdiction of the AFWO; the permittee may not commence activities authorized by this permit until:permission is received from the AF WO. For locations within the boundaries of other Fish and Wildlife Offices in California,after 15 days of the Service's receipt Of the notification, the permittee may commence activities authorized by this permit unless authorization Stilled. tithe permittec is dcnicd authorization to conduct activities at-the requested locution(s), including previously authorized sites. a request for reconsideration may be submitted to.the Endangered Species Division Chief at the Service's Regional Office for the Pacific Southwest Region (Region 8), 2800 Cottage Way; Room W-2606. California,95825-1846:as. P277 Page 3 of 15 TE-80.3242-8 provided in 50 CFR 1129. The procedures specified in 50 CFR 13.29(b)must be. followed. 6: Authorized individuals: Only individuals on the attached List of Authorized Individuals(List) are authorized to conduct activities pursuant to this permit:. The List, printed on Service letterhead.may identify special conditions or circumstances under which individuals are authorized to. conduct permitted activities and must be retained with these Special Terms and. Conditions. Each named individual shall be responsible for compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit.. To request changes to the List, the permittee shall submit written requests to the. Recovery Permit Coordinator at the CFWO. The request shall be submitted at least 30' days prior to the requested effective date. The request shall be signed and dated by the permittee and include: a. The permit number; b: The name of each individual to be appended to the List; c. The resumeiqualifications statement of each person to be appended to the List, detailing their experience with each species and type of activity for which authorization is requested: d. The.names,phone numbers and email addresses of a minimum of two references or lettereof reference: Letters'ofreference should address the individual's qualifications for the specific activities to be conducted;and e. The names of the individuals to be deleted from the List. Note: This procedure is for personnel changes only: For requests to renewiamend this permit,a complete application must be submitted to the.Endangered Species Division Chief,at the Region 3 Office. T: Taking of the coastal'California gnatcatcher(gnatcatcher). The permittee is authorized to survey for gnatcatchers using taped vocalizations within the geographic boundaries specified above, and the time limitation specified in the permit. provided that:. a. Surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the approved Service protocol for gatcatcher surveys unless authorized in advance by the Recovery Permit. Coordinator at the appropriate FWO. P278 Page 4 of 1 TE-808242-8 h. Tapes are used only until individuals have been initially located and not to elicit further behavior: c. Surveys are not conducted during inclement weather conditions that would' significantly reduce the detectability of the species or expose:nest contents to the elements(e.g., rain, strong wind, fog). Nest monitoring activities are not authorized pursuant to this permit; 8:, Taking of the pocket mouse: The permittee is authorized to survey, capture,handle.,and release all individual mice within the geographic boundaries specified above and time limitation specified in the. permit Individuals captured may be held for up to t 0 minutes, and then shall be.released' at the capture site, provided that: a.. For detenrninationpfpresence of pocket mouse at a given site. all trapsmust be located to include areas that.best typify pocket mouse habitat, and placed in sufficient numbers to provide adequate coverage of suitable habitat.. Trapping shall continue for a minimum of 5 consecutive nights. unless othenviseauthorized by the Service: For studies of the pocket mouse, the number of traps, trap placement, and duration of trapping shall be determined in coordination with.:and require prior approval from. the.CFWO: u. Except as provided in this paragraph,only 9-inch or 12-inch long Sherman lit'e traps,or traps of similar design and efficiency;shall be used to trap in potential or known pocket mouse habitat. Traps of similar design and efficiency require, approval:by the CF\S'Orand the COPY/prior to their use. .all trap'models shall be modified to eliminate or substantially reduce the risk'of injury(e.g., tail. lacerations or excisions)to pocket mice and sympatric species: c. To minimiethe potential for inadvertent take during daylight hours,traps shall only be operated (i.e. left open to allow for capture) from the time that they are baited around.sunset(not to exceed 2-hours before sunset) until traps are checked at sunrise.. d. Traps.must be checked at least twice per night, once near midnight and again at • sunrise. Trapping maynot be conducted if the nightly low temperature is forecast to be below 50 degrees+Fahrenheit and/or if extended wind, rain..or other inclement weather make(or have made).conditions unsuitable for trapping, or unduly jeopardize the lives of pocket mice. Exceptions may be made on a case by-case basis with prierwritten approval from CFWO.. e. To minimize the exposure of pocket mice to ants during surveys all bait shall be emptied froth traps during each sunrise trap'check and traps shall only be baited. • P279 Page 5 of 15 TE-8082.42-8 between the time that traps are opened around sunset and the time that their contents are checked at sunrise. No mutilation marking scheme (e.g., toe-clipping, car-clipping)will be allowed. No invasive technique(e.g.,PIT-taegine) will be allowed unless specifically authorized by the Region 8 office., Other marking schemes(e.g.., hair clipping, car-tagging)are permissible with.prior approval by the CF.WO. g.. Plastic bags shall be used only for removing pocket mice from the traps(for extraction and processing): Trapped individuals shall be processed as quickly as possible to reduce stress to the.animals.. Under no circumstances shall the individual be kept in plastic bags beyond 5 minutes.. Trapped pocket mice that must be kept for longer periods of time shall be transferred into a clean, structurally sound, breathable container withadequate ventilation. At no time shall the individual be allowed to become stressed:due to temperature extremes. (either hot or cold): h. Each time the traps are placed,set,and baited, the traps shall be adjusted and set by hand at a sensitivity level appropriate for capturing Pacific pocket mice: When closing traps., each trap shall be visually inspected and closed by hand. i. Measures'to ensure'that all trapsare monitored and visited shall,at a minimum„ include: i. All trap locations shalhbe identified with a unique identification code. While checking traps,.a log sheet shall beused:. Each time the trap is checked; the surveyor shall note the action on the log sheet. Periodically, the survey-tat-shall review the log sheet to ensure that no traps are missed: iii. The log sheet shall be in addition to (or incorporated into)other field notes or data sheets that are used for noting trap contents..The log sheet and' field notes/data sheets (collectively, the field documentation) shall be formatted to ensure the surveyor; trap(as identified by the unique identification code), and date time checked are documented. Field documentation shall be available to Service personnel upon request (includingduring compliance inspections in the field). iv. In the field, all trap locations shall be marked with tlaegine,reflective tape.or another technique that allows the surveyor to readily locate.the' traps under daytime and,nighttime conditions. To the maximum extent possible, the markings shall be visible from a distance of at least 5 meters (16.3 feet) away from the trap location. j. The permitted shall notify the CFWQ within -IS hours if a new population of pocket mice is discovered.. P28O Page 6 of 15 TE-808Z42-8 9,. Taking of the arroyo southwestern toad(toad): The petmittee.is authorized to survey,capture;handle, measure; and release all life stages' of the toad within the geographicboundanes specified'above, and the time limitation specified in the permit; provided that: a. All toad surveys shall follow the guidelines set forth in the Service's Survey Protocol for the Arrow Toad,dated May 19, 1999. b:. Surveys conducted in non-breeding habitat(= upland habitat)shall use as a means of capture pitfall trapping and drift-net fencing,so long asmethodsare employed consistent with approved techniques for herpetological studies.. c. Amplexing pairs of toads shall not be captured, handled,or disturbed. d. Disturbance and collectiotrof'eggs or egg masses is not authorized pursuant toi this permit. e. Methods used forcapture shall follow commonly accepted techniques for, amphibian field sampling, including: (I) capture by hand; (2)dip-netting; and(3) scooping up by container traps.unless otherwise authorized. K. Toads shall be maintained at or near the site of capture in a manner that optimizes. their survival. g All handling of toads shall'adhere to the following measures:. i. Toads shall be handled in an expedient inanner to minimize harm to the. toads., ii. The hands and arms of all permittees handling toads shall be free of. lotions, creams.sunscreen, oils, ointment, insect repellent, or any other substance that may harm the toads: iii.. Arroyo toads exhibiting signs of physiological distress shall be immediately released at the point of capture. iv.. All arroyo toads shall be released at the point of capture;except when moving arroyo toads from roads and'into'suitable unoccupied habitat immediately adjacent to the roadway. h. In an effort to minimize the spread of pathogens that may be transferred as•result of sun•evs. surveyors,shall implement the following protocol for disinfecting equipment and clothing after surveying a pondandbefore entering a new pond. unless the wetlands are hydrologically connected to one another. P281 Page 7 of 15'. TE-808242-8 All organic matter shall be removed from nets: traps,boots.vehicle tires, and all other surfaces that have come into contact with water or potentially. contaminated sediments: Cleaned items shall be rinsed with clean water- before leaving each study-site. ii. Boots,nets,traps,etc.,shall then be scrubbed, sprayed,or dipped in either a bleach solution(0.5 to 1.0 cup per 1.0 gallon of water). Virkon diluted to 1 gram/liter(3.78 gram per gallon of water),or Quat-128(1 ounce per gallon of water)and rinsed clean with water between study sites.. Cleaning equipment in the immediate vicinity of a pond or wetland shall be avoided. Care shall be taken so that all traces of the disinfectant are- removed before entering the next aquatic habitat_ When working at sites with known or suspected disease problems; disposable gloves shall be:wom and changed.between handling each animal.. Gloves shall be wetted with water from the site or distilled water prior to handling any.amphibians. Gloves shall he removed by turning inside out to minimize cross-contamination; iv. Used-cleaning materials(liquids, etc.)shall be disposed of safely and taken back to the lab for proper disposal. Used disposable gloves shall be retained for safe disposal in sealed bags Collection of the toad'(any life stage) for voucher specimens is not authorized. 10. Taking of the-Delhi.Sands flower-loving fly(fly): The permittee.is.authorized to survey by pursuit for the fly within the geographic boundaries specified above,and the time limitation specified in the permit, provided that: a.. No marking-release-capture techniques shall be used;. b. in any of its life stages,the fly shall not be captured, netted, or handled. c. The pemtinee shall implement all of the actions included in the attached U.S Fish and IE'ildlife Service Interim General Survey Guidelines for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly dated December 30, 1996. including a written report summarizing.the data from the tly surveys performed under this permit. Per the Guidelines,this report is-to be sent to the CFWO and to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife(CDFW). Attention:.Permit Biologist; Wildlife: Branch, 1812 Ninth Street, Sacramento,California 95811 (telephone: 916-445- 3764),within 30 calendar days after completing the last field visit of the season at each project site. The report shall include,but not be limited to, the raw data collected during the study and completed field forms utilized by the CDFW Natural Diversity Data Base. P282 Page 8 of 15 TE-808242-S d. The permittee shall successfully pass the most recent version of the Service's practical exam for fly identification prior to initiating focused adult surveys, unless authorized in advance by a letter from the Service: e: Each interim survey report shall include a page containing a signature block(s) for each independent investigator who conducted surveys on the subject property.. This signature page shall include.a statement indicating that each investigator has read and concurs with the content of the report. I I. Taking of the California red-legged frog(frog): The petmittee is authorized to harass by survey,capture,handle. and immediately release the frog within the"geographic boundaries specified above. and the time limitation specified in the permit.provided.that: a. All surveys shall follow methodology described in the most current protocol for the frog: It water conditions are such that visual surveys are feasible and adequate: only visual survey methods shall be employed. Snorkeling and walking through shallow water may tie used during visual sampling. ii. For presence/{absence surveys only,:if positive identification of the California red-legged frog is made at a site, no capture and handling shall be done. in If captured frogs are handled for identification,measurement, and photographs before being released, all measurements shall be obtained in an expedient manner. iv. No egg masses may be harassed in any manner for any activity authorized in this permit: v. All captured frogs shall be released at the point of capture unless that location puts them in imminent danger. in which case they shall be placed in a nearby refugium sufficient to protect them. vi. Larval frogs shall not be handled out of the water for longer than 30' seconds unless rewetted. and shall not be retained for lobster than 5 minutes for proccssin5J. vii: Unless otherwise specified in.a study plan previously approved,in writing by the Service.all frogs shall be released at the point of capture: • P283 Page 9ofl5 TE-808242-8 viii. Any frogs exhibiting signs of physiological stress shall be immediately released at the point of capture:. is. Frogs:shall not be anesthetized at any time. x. The translocation of frogs is not authorised pursuant to this recovery permit. xi. Frogs will not be removed from the wild and held in captivity for any reason-unless prior written approval is acquired by the appropriate FWO, unless the severity:of an injury to the frog obviates ithmediate care. Animals shall be transported according to accepted methods; in moist cloth bags or.in terrarium with moisture gel ornon-cellulose sponge to minimize desiccation.. • xii. The number of frogs to be captured is no.more than 30 adults per habitat • location per year.. b. Capture methods shalt follow commonly accepted techniques for amphibian field sampling, including: (i)capture by hand (wet handsonly);and(ii)dip-netting.. c. The hands and arms of all"*orkers handling frogs shall be free of lotions,creams,. sunscreen, oils, ointment. insect repellent, or any other material that may harm. frogs. Handling.of frogs shall be done with wet hands. d. Amplexing pairs.of frogs.shall not be captured, handled,or disturbed.. e. Information on newlocalities for the frog shall be reported immediately, and this notification shall be followed up in writing to the appropriate FWO and the California Natural Diversity Database within 3 working days of their discovery. Information may be submitted electronically if pre-arranged with the Recovery Pennit Coordinator: f. In art effort to minimize the spread of pathogens that may be transferred as result of permitted activities, surveyors shall follow the guidance outlined below for disinfecting equipment and clothing after entering a pond and before entering a. new pond, unless the wetlands are hydrologically connected to one another: Alt organic matter shall be removed from nets. traps, boots. vehicle tires and all other surfaces that have come into contact with water or potentially contaminated sediments.. Cleaned items shall be rinsed with clean water before leaving each study site. ii. Boots. nets, traps, hands, etc.. shall be scrubbed with a bleach solution(0.5 to 1.0 cup per 1.0 gallon of water), Quat-128 (l to 60), or a 3 to 6 percent P284 • Page 10 of 15 • TE-8082424 sodium hypoehlorite S0lu0011. Equipment shall be rinsed clean with water between study sites: Cleaning equipment in the immediate vicinity,of a. pond or wetland shall be avoided (e.g.,clean in an area at least,100 feet from aquatic features). Care shall be taken so that all traces of the disinfectant are removed before entering the next aquatic habitat: iii. When working at sites.with known or suspected disease problems, disposable gloves shall be worn and changed between handling each animal. Gloves shall be wetted with water from the site or distilled water prior to handling any amphibians. Gloves shall be removed by turning: inside Out with hands cleaned using a hand cleaner and water rinse to minimize cross-contamination. iv. Used cleaning materials(liquids, etc:) shall be disposed of safely, and if necessary.taken back to the lab for propel disposal. Used disposable gloves shall be retained',for safe disposal.in sealed bags. g.. When working in potential frog habitats, such as freshwater streatns, vernal pools. agricultural canals, and stock ponds. the permittee shall be aware of all areas known to support co-occurring endangered and threatened species, including:. tidewater gobies.(Eucvclogobitis newbenyi), California freshwater shrimp (Svncaris[2'aciftca), California tiger salamanders(Antb)stanra californiense), and giant garter snakes(Thatnnophis gigas)..The permittee,shall take suitable precautions to.avoid.injuries and mortalities to thesecspecies, up to and including avoidance of the area.. h. The nuniber.of adult.frogs.to be haiassedby approach within 20 feet shall be no. more than 40 per habitat location (stream,pond,or other aquatic habitat feature), including any unidentified adult rands of a size to potentially be frogs, 12'_ W:thin 45 days following completion of a survey for the gnatcatcher, pocketmouse,toad, fly,or frog, a report shall be submitted to the Recovery Permit Coordinatorat the appropriate jurisdictional FWO for which the activity was conducted, that includes:(a) thelocation of the survey area delineated on a USGS topographic map(1:24.000 scale); (b)a qualitative description of the plant.communities (including dominant species and habitat quality)on and adjacent to the survey area; (c) a complete description of survey methods including the names of personnel..the number of acres surveyed per biologist per survey-day; the number and dates of surveys, survey routes,the temperature and weather conditions ar the beginning and end of each survey. and how frequently taped vocalizations were used, if at all: (d)the number, age (adult. independent juvenile, dependent juvenile.recently fledged juvenile. nestling; tadpole. unknown}, and sex of all enatcatchers;brown-headed.cowbirds(blbibthrus Etter), pocket mice; arroyo toads; flies and frogs detected.and these data shall also be plotted on 1:24,000 scale map(s).of the survey area to the extent possible: (e)APN for the site•(if possible); (f) GP S coordinates (ifpossible); (g) a conclusion section that specifically provides recommendations for recovery of the species; and (h)other pertinent observations made during survey efforts. • • - P285 Page I t of 15 TE-308242-g Information may be submitted electronically if pre-arranged with the Recovery Permit Coordinator. 13, Minor deviation from the stipulated terms and conditions may be authorized on a case by-case basis when approved by the appropriate FWO unless an amendment to this. permit would be required. 14. This permit does not cover any activities authorized pursuant to a biological opinion or habitat conservation plan(HCP). All such activities must be authorized,by the office that wrote the biological opinion,issued the section 10(a)(1)(B)incidental take permit based on an HCP,or is the lead field office implementing the HCP: Note also that this pennit is. not to be construed as meaning that the permittee or other authorized individuals are qualified to conduct activities pursuant to a biological opinion or HCP except insofar as the activities are similar to those authorized in this permit. Their qualifications for activities to be done pursuant to the biological:opinion are subject to review and written approval for the specific activities by the office that wrote the biological opinion,issued the.section I0(a)(.1)(B)incidental take permit based on an HCP,or is the lead field'office implementing.the HCP. IS.. This permit does not authorize rake of federally listed species that are not specifically authorized pursuant to this permit: However,the Service acknowledges that incidental take of a co-occurring federally listed species could potentially occur while conducting certain permitted activities for some species:Although,incidental take of a co-occurring; federally listed species is more likely to occur for some,species and activities than another, and that incidental take of a co-occurring federally listed species may not occur at all for some permitted activities,when applicable,the following conditions now apply to all.federally listed animals that the permittee is not authorized to take pursuant to this. permit,but which maybe incidentally sighted,'encountered,captured, injured;or killed: a.: Each individual authorized pursuant to this.permit shall be knowledgeable about potentially co-occurring listed species that may ocean-throughout the habitats in which permitted activities are conducted and must be observant and cautious to the extent that"take"of a co-occurring listed species is minimized to the maximum extent practicable.;. b. Any federally,listed animal that the permittee is not authorized to take pursuant to this permit:but is incidentally captured during the course of conducting authorized activities. shall be released immediately at the point of capture. c. During the course of your perritted activities, if an incidental injuty or mortality occurs to a federally,listed species not authorized in this permit, the permittee shall follow instructions specified in condition lb below, d. Any incidental capture. injury or mortality of a federally listed species not authorized in this permit shall be recorded and reported'in the'annual report submitted pursuant to this permit. P286 • Page 12 of 15 TE-803242-8 e. We requear that all incidental encounters and/or sightings of other federally listed species not authorized under this permit be recorded and reported in the annual report submitted pursuant to this permit and also reported to the CNDDB as' specified in condition number 19 below:. 16. The number of individuals allowed to be incidentally injured of killed during activities conducted pursuant to this permit is.0 (zero)gnatcatchers,0(zero) pocket mice, 0(zero) arroyo toads,0(zero) frogs,.and 0(zero) flies in any calendar year. a. Any incidental injury or killing must be reported within 3 working days to the Regional Recovery Permit Coordinator(telephone: 760431-9440)and the Recovery Permit Coordinator at the appropriate FWO. b. in the event that the number of individuals allowed to be incidentally injured or. killed is exceeded during the performance of permitted activities,the permittee must: i. Immediately cease the activity until reauthorized by the Region 8 office, which may; after analysis of the circumstances of injury or mortality, revoke or amend this permit: ii. Immediately notify the Regional Recovery Permit Coordinator and the' Recovery Permit Coordinator at the appropriate FWO: Within 3 working. days. the permittee shall follow-up such verbal notification in writing to each office. iii: With the written notification,the permittee is to provide a report of the circumstances that led to the injury.ormortality. A description of the- changes in protocols that.will be implemented to reduce the likelihood of such injury or mortality from happening again should be included, if appropriate.. A copy of this report shall also be sent to the California- Department of Fish and Wildlife(CDFW),Attention: Permitting Biologist, Wildlife Branch: 1812 Ninth Street, Sacramento, California 95811(telephone:916-445-3764): c. Dead specimens and/or appropriate parts of dead specimens that are incidentally taken pursuant to this section shall be preserved in accordance with standard museum practices. Within 120 days, the preserved specimen(s) shall be properly labeled and deposited with one of the designated repositories specified below. Specimens must be accessioned with complete collecting data The permittee shall supply the repository with a copy of this permit to validate that the specimens supplied to the museum were taken pursuant.to a permit. Collection data(e.g.,dates and location) and deposition of carcasses by the permittee must be reported in the subsequent annual report.. . . P287 Page 13 of 15 TE-808242-8 17. The permittee is authorized to:salvage all gnatcatcher, pocket mouse, arroyo toad, frog, and fly carcasses to be provided to one of the designated repositories within.l20 days of the collection by Following condition number 1 1(c)above. Any specimens salvaged shall be documented and.specified in the annual report submitted to the.appropriate field office: 18. Designated repositories: a. For the fly: The Entomological Museum. University of California, Riverside, California. b. For all other species: The Los.Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Los Angeles, California, the San Bernardino Museum of Natural History, Redlands,California;or the San Diego Natural History Museum, San Diego, California. 19: California Natural Diversity Database formsshall be completed. as appropriate, for each listed species addressed herein and submitted to the Biogeographic Data Branch, CDFW, 1807 13th Street. Suite 202. Sacramento: California 95811 (also accessible online at:• http:!/www.dfct.ca.ttov-bioeeodataicnddb), with copies submitted to the appropriate FWO. Copies of the form:can be obtained from the.CDFW at the above address (telephone:916-324-3812): 20: All reports or other documents that include information gathered under the authority, of this permit(e.g., reports prepared by consulting firths for their clients: theses, or scientific. journal articles)shall reference this permit number. Copies of such documents shall. include a transmittal letter and be provided to the Recovery Permit Coordinator at the• VFWO and the SFWO upon their completion. Draft documents, rawifield data, and other information resulting from work conducted under the authorityof this permit shall be. submitted to the Service upon request. 21. Annual reports: An annual report shall be submitted to the Recovery Permit Coordinator at the CFWO and VFWO by January 31, following each year this permit is in effect as specified below. In order to track, document,and assess all project specific activities conducted pursuant to this permit. we are requiring an annual summary report be submitted that summarizes. all of the activities conducted pursuant to tttis permit during the previous calendar year. Activities that are continuous(i.e.. overlappingin two or more calendar years); must be reported each year the activity is in effect. The CFWO and VFWO (as specified in condition number 5 above) shall receive separate, independent summary reports specifying only those permitted activities conducted within their respective jurisdictions: P288 • Page 14 of IN TE-80$242.8 The annual summary report shall be in the following format to include and not be limited to the following; a. Permittee name and number with date of expiration. b. A section listing all authorized activities conducted for each permitted species during the previous calendar year,. This information can be in tabular format and should provide a summary of each activity for each species authorized in this permit.. This section shall include but not be limited to: The name and.title,of each specific project,survey, or trapping,activity conducted during the previous calendar year, preferably the same title as the comprehensive survey reports previously or concurrently being submitted to the Service(as referenced in condition number 12 above); ii. The speci,fie location of the project site.includingshe County; iii. The common and scientific:names.of the listed species for which the pettmitied activity was conducted;. iv. The numbers of individuals observed and the dates of observation; v The date and name of the,Service office,tvhere each individual comprehensive project report(s)have been or will be submitted;. vii. Whether or not GIS.data was submitted;,and viii. The version of each'activity report (draft or final) and the report date. If a draft report was submitted. indicate the reason(ongoing activities; processingianalysis of data, final report in review, final report in progress, etc:)and the anticipated tinafreport finish date: c: \umber of indicidualsincidentally injured andfor killed including dates locations, circumstances'of take;and depository receiving the preserved. specimen(s). If no injuries or mortalities occurred, please state this in writing in your annual summary report. d. Other pertinent observations made regarding the status or ecology of the species: e. Planned future activities,if authorized under this permit. If no activities were conducted with any,or all species authorized under the permit during the previous year within any field office jurisdiction. you must state this in writing in your annual summary report to that field office. • - P289 Page 15oftS TE-808242-8 22:. Failure to comply with reporting requirements may result in non-renewal or suspension/revocation of this permit. /•:4*-• ,dee ../77 Date Endangered Species ston.Chief Special Note to Permittee:. The hantavirus has been detected in rodents in the southern California region. It is the permittee's responsibility to be aware of this and other zoonotic diseases and to take appropriate precautions if necessary or if desired. • • P290 • ` United States Department of the Interior ft, wits FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE -t Pacific Southwest Region 2800 Cottage Way,Suite W-2606 Sacramento, California.9382$-1846 LIST OF AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUALS TE-808242-8 I. Individual authorized to independently conduct activities pursuant to this permit: Scott D. Cameron: Supervised individuals may conduct activities pursuant to this permit only under the direct, on-site supervision of Mr. Cameron. "On-site supervision'is defined as a supervised individual conducting activities within 3 meters(9.8 feet)of'an independently authotized individual,. /di hi /,- , ,F Date Endangered:Specte&'J tsionChief This List is only valid if it is dated on or after the-permit issuance date. P291 Response to Comments from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service DRC2014-00127 Staff received a comment letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on September 27, 2014 related to the Mitigated Negative Declaration circulated for Development Review DRC2014-00127.The letter stated that the Habitat Study (Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc., July 22, 2014) submitted for the project was inadequate relating to the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly (DSF), as the biologist who performed the study was not"permitted" by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.The letter stated that the applicant could rectify the deficiency by either doing two consecutive seasons of surveys for DSF with negative results to determine presumptive absence or conduct a follow-up study by a,"permitted" DSF biologist which provides conclusive evidence that the site does not contain potential DSF habitat. The applicant submitted a follow-up study (Ecological Sciences, October 27, 2014) by a "permitted" biologist for the DSF. The study determined that the conditions found on the project site were not consistent with those known or expected to support DSF and that under current conditions the site would generally be considered prohibitive to DSF occupation. The study concluded that no impacts to the DSF are expected and no mitigation is required for less than significant impacts under CEQA. Staff forwarded the follow-up study along with the author of the study's U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service "recovery permit" on October 29, 2014 to Geary Hund of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.Staff received no response and resent the documents on November 19,2014.Geary Hund from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service responded that he would review the submitted documents with his supervisor and comment back within a week. No response was received and staff sent a third request on December 4,2014.Geary Hund for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service responded that they were very busy and would try to comment within the following week. The Planning Director reviewed the follow-up study for the DSF and determined that the applicant had adequately addressed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's request and that the project could move forward to the City Council for final project approval. The Planning Director made this conclusion based on the fact that the follow-up study by Ecological Sciences concluded that the project site was unsuitable to support or sustain a viable DSF population. That the on-site soils are dominated by heavy deposits of alluvial material with little evidence of the existence of Delhi sands. CEQA Section 15073.5 (C(4))does not require the lead agency to recirculate the Mitigated Negative Declaration when the new information added during the public comment period merely clarifies the original findings. In this case,the new study prepared in response to comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service confirmed that the site was not suitable habitat for the Delhi Sand Flower Loving Fly. f7 • • P292 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING S ,. PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2014-00127 This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 r • • P293 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2014-00127 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. I:\PLANNING\Tabe\DRC2014-00127 MMP Form.doc P294 A City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012, Development Review DRC2014-00127, and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126. Public Review Period Closes: September 24, 2014 Project Name: Project Applicant: Commerce Construction Company, LLC Project Location (also see attached map): Located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Project Description: A request to change the land use designation and to modify the Zoning Map from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) and a site plan and architectural review to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 acre project site. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. December 17, 2014 I Date of Determination Adopted By • P295 RESOLUTION NO. 14-221 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(GI) IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A 139,983 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON A 6.6-ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED SOUTH OF MISSION PARK DRIVE BETWEEN RICHMOND PLACE AND BUFFALO AVENUE WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK(IP)DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS: 0229-401-06, 07, 08, AND 09. A. Recitals. 1. Commerce Construction Co., LP filed an application for the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September, 2014 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On the 17h day of December; 2014 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on December 17, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 6.6 acres of land comprised of Assessor Parcel Numbers 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09 which is basically square in shape and located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (IP) as described and shown as Attachment A; and b. The property to the west is developed with industrial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; to the east is a large warehouse distribution building that is partially in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District and partially within the General Industrial (GI) Development District; to the north are industrial buildings within the General Industrial (GI) Development District; and, to the south, are commercial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; and P296 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 14-221 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP DECEMBER 17, 2014 c. The amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. With approval of this General Plan Amendment and the related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2014-00126)the General Plan and Zoning Map will have the same land use designation. d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element in that the General Plan envisions that the industrially zoned areas of the City will be used for a variety of industrial, manufacturing, heavy industry and similar uses. The General Industrial (GI) • land use designation permits a wide range of industrial activates including manufacturing and warehouse distribution that conform to the intent of the overall development district by the General Plan. e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The properties to the north, east and west are developed with similar land uses and will not be negatively impacted by the approval of this General Plan Amendment. f. This amendment results in a public benefit in that in that it increases the overall the number and diversity of jobs available in the City and strengthens the industrial base of the area surrounding the project site, which is predominately industrial in nature. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This General Plan Amendment as shown and described on Attachments B and C which will change the land use designation for the project site from Industrial Park (IP) to General Industrial (GI) will benefit the City by increasing the overall size and diversity of the employment base. It will also strengthen the existing industrial base of the area surrounding the project site by providing a synergy of similar industrial uses. The project site is surrounded by industrial development to the east, west and north and will become an integral part of the surrounding industrial base; and b. This General Plan Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development consistent with the General Plan and with the surrounding land uses; and c. The proposed General Plan Amendment does not conflict with any of the goals of the General Plan and furthers the following General Plan policies: I. (Policy LU 9.1)—Preserve and enhance the special qualities of existing districts • and neighborhoods through focused attention on land use, community design, and economic development. Changing the land use designation will permit the project site to be developed with a warehouse/distribution building that is of similar size and use to the existing industrial buildings in the surrounding area. This will in turn enhance and strengthen the industrial base in this part of the City. Resolution No. 14-221 - Page 2 of 4 • P297 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 14-221 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP DECEMBER 17, 2014 II. (Policy ED-4.1) — Encourage high-quality design for infill development and continue to support new high-quality uses. The approved building for the project site incorporates a large amount of glazing and stone veneer giving the building a more commercial appearance which will provide a transition between the adjacent commercial uses to the south and the industrial uses to the east, west and north. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. On September 24, 2014 the Planning Commission reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the General Plan Amendment and recommended adoption by the City Council. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. • c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Council also reviewed staffs Response to • Comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Staff's determination that CEQA Section 15073.5 (C(4)) does not require the lead agency to recirculate the Mitigated Negative Declaration when the new information added during the public comment period merely clarifies the original findings. In this case, the new study prepared in response to comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service confirmed that the site was not suitable habitat for the Delhi Sand Flower Loving Fly. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. . Resolution No. 14-221 - Page 3 of 4 P298 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 14-221 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP DECEMBER 17, 2014 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves the application for General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee of $2,231.25 for filing the environmental determination. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform . Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Resolution No. 14-221 - Page 4 of 4 • • P299 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of San Bernardino and described as follows: PARCEL ONE: Parcels 17 and 18 as shown on Parcel Map No. 11671, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, filed in Book 143 of Parcel Maps, Pages 41 to 46, inclusive, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as amended by Certificate of Correction recorded January 21, 1992 as Instrument No. 92-022126 of Official Records. PARCEL TWO: Parcel 16 as shown on Parcel Map No. 11671, situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as filed in Book 143 of Parcel Maps, pages 41 through 46 inclusive, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as amended by Certificate of Correction recorded January 21, 1992 as Instrument No. 92-022126 of Official Records Excepting therefrom that portion of said Parcel 16, described as follows: Beginning at the northwesterly corner of said Parcel 14; thence South 77° 47' 36" East, 104.09 feet along the northerly line of said Parcel 14; thence South 89° 26' 05" East, 203.32 feet continuing along said northerly line of Parcel 14 to the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 16; thence North 00° 33' 56" West, 94.15 feet along the easterly line of said Parcel 16; thence North 89° 25' 15"West, 292.90 feet to a point on the westerly line of said Parcel 16, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 1033.00 feet, a radial line through said point bears North 81° 54' 47" West; thence southerly, along said westerly line and said curve an arc length of 74.28 feet, through a central angle of 04° 07' 11"to the Point of Beginning. Pursuant to Certificate of Compliance No. 618 for Lot Line Adjustment executed by Cal Development, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, recorded March 2, 2006 as Instrument No. 2006-0144360 of Official Records. PARCEL THREE: Parcel 15 as shown on Parcel Map No. 11671, situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as filed in Book 143 of Parcel Maps, pages 41 through 46 inclusive, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as amended by Certificate of Correction recorded January 21, 1992 as Instrument No. 92-022126 of Official Records. Excepting therefrom that portion of said Parcel 15, described as follows: Commencing at the northwesterly corner of Parcel 14 of said Parcel Map No. 11671, as filed in Book 143 of Parcel Maps, pages 41 through 46 inclusive, records of said County; thence South 77°47' 36" East, 104.09 feet along the northerly line of said Parcel 14; thence South 89° 26' 05" East, 203.32 feet continuing along said northerly line of Parcel 14 to the southeasterly corner of Parcel 16 of said Parcel Map No. 11671, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing South 89° 26' 05" East, 49.97 feet along said northerly line of Parcel 14; thence North 00° 35' 04" East, 94.14 feet; thence North 89° 25' 15"West, 50.01 feet to a point on the easterly line of said Parcel 16, said point being North 00° 33' 56"West, 94.15 feet along said easterly line from said southeasterly corner of Parcel 16; thence South 00° 33' 56" East, 94.15 feet along said easterly line to the Point of Beginning. Pursuant to Certificate of Compliance No. 618 for Lot Line Adjustment executed by Cal Development, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, recorded March 2, 2006 as Instrument No. 2006-0144360 of Official Records. Page 3 of 9 Attachment A • • P300 APN: 0229-401-06, 0229-401-07, 0229-401-08, and 0229-401-09 (End of Legal Description) File No.:01180-39877 Page 4 of 9 Prelim Report SCE P301 • aA ru 0 • E w '-- C, (1) o 071141.111.- Qx0100301 CL Attachment B P302 c C o CL r a. o £ _ Q o v •- 0 • --GNOMON,- o , a CL 1i Attachment C P303 ORDINANCE NO. 14-871 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126,A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE ZONING MAP TO CHANGE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A 139,983 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON A 6.6-ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED SOUTH OF MISSION PARK DRIVE BETWEEN RICHMOND PLACE AND BUFFALO AVENUE WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APNS: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 AND 09. A. Recitals. 1. Commerce Construction Co., LP filed an application for the approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Zoning Map Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September, 2014 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On the 17th day of December 2014 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on December 17, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 6.6 acres of land comprised of assessor parcel numbers 0229-401-06, 07, 08, and 09 which is basically square in shape and located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (IP) as shown and described in Attachment A; and b. The property to the west is developed with industrial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; to the east is a large warehouse distribution building that is partially in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District and partially within the General Industrial (GI) Development District;to the north are industrial buildings within the General Industrial (GI) Development District; and, to the south, are commercial buildings within the Industrial Park (IP) Development District; and P304 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 14-871 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP DECEMBER 17, 2014 Page 2 c. The current General Plan land use designation of the project site is Industrial Park(IP) as shown in Attachment B to this Ordinance; and d. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment will change the Zoning Map designation to General Industrial (GI), which will bring the site into conformance with the General Plan Land Use Element which was amended by the related General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 as shown on Attachment C. e. The amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. With approval of this Zoning Map Amendment and the related General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00012) the Zoning Map and the General Plan will have the same land use designation. f. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element in that the General Plan envisions that the industrially zoned areas of the City will be used for a variety of industrial, manufacturing, heavy industry and similar uses. The General Industrial (GI) land use designation permits a wide range of industrial activates including manufacturing and warehouse distribution that conform to the intent of the overall development district by the General Plan. g. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The properties to the north, east and west are developed with similar land uses and will not be negatively impacted by the approval of this Zoning Map Amendment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Zoning Map amendment as shown in Attachments C does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development,within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. With approval of the related General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00012) the Zoning Map and General Plan will have the same land use designation. b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element in that the General Industrial (GI) land use designation permits a wide range of industrial activities that include manufacturing and wholesale supply; c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The properties to the north, east and west are developed with similar land uses and will not be negatively impacted with the Zoning Map Amendment. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: P305 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 14-871 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP • DECEMBER 17, 2014 Page 3 • a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures,there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. On September 24, 2014 the Planning Commission reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Zoning Map Amendment and recommended adoption by the City Council. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated NegativeDeclaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Council also reviewed staffs Response to Comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Staffs determination that CEQA Section 15073.5(C(4))does not require the lead agency to recirculate the Mitigated Negative Declaration when the new information added during the public comment period merely clarifies the original findings. In this case, the new study prepared in response to comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service confirmed that the site was not suitable habitat for the Delhi Sand Flower Loving Fly. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council adopts Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 as identified in this Ordinance and as shown on Attachment C and hereby incorporated in this Ordinance. 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. P3O6 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 14-871 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION CO, LP DECEMBER 17, 2014 Page 4 7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. • P307 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of San Bernardino and - described as follows: PARCEL ONE: Parcels 17 and 18 as shown on Parcel Map No. 11671, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San • Bernardino, State of California, filed in Book 143 of Parcel Maps, Pages 41 to 46, inclusive, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as amended by Certificate of Correction recorded January 21, 1992 as Instrument No. 92-022126 of Official Records. PARCEL TWO: • • Parcel 16 as shown on Parcel Map No. 11671, situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as filed in Book 143 of Parcel Maps, pages 41 through 46 inclusive, in the • • Office of the County Recorder of said County, as amended by Certificate of Correction recorded January 21, 1992 as Instrument No. 92-022126 of Official Records' Excepting therefrom that portion of said Parcel 16, described as follows: Beginning at the northwesterly corner of said Parcel 14; thence South 77°47' 36" East, 104.09 feet along the northerly line of said Parcel 14; thence South 89° 26' 05" East, 203.32 feet continuing along said northerly line of Parcel 14 to the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 16; thence North 00° 33' 56" West, 94.15 feet along the easterly line of said Parcel 16; thence North 89° 25' 15"West, 292.90 feet to a point on the westerly line of said Parcel 16, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 1033.00 feet, a radial line through said point bears North 81° 54' 47" West; thence southerly, along said westerly line and said curve an arc length of 74.28 feet, through a central angle of 04° 07' 11"to the Point of Beginning. Pursuant to Certificate of Compliance No. 618 for Lot Line Adjustment executed by Cal Development, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, recorded March 2, 2006 as Instrument No. 2006-0144360 of Official Records. PARCEL THREE: Parcel 15 as shown on Parcel Map No. 11671, situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as filed in Book 143 of Parcel Maps, pages 41 through 46 inclusive, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as amended by Certificate of Correction recorded January 21, 1992 as Instrument No. 92-022126 of Official Records. Excepting therefrom that portion of said Parcel 15, described as follows: Commencing at the northwesterly corner of Parcel 14 of said Parcel Map No. 11671, as filed in Book 143 of Parcel Maps, pages 41 through 46 inclusive, records of said County; thence South 77° 47' 36" East, 104.09 feet along the northerly line of said Parcel 14; thence South 89° 26' 05" East, 203.32 feet continuing along said northerly line of Parcel 14 to the southeasterly corner of Parcel 16 of said Parcel Map No. 11671, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing South 89° 26' 05" East, 49.97 feet along said northerly line of Parcel 14; thence North 00° 35' 04" East, 94.14 feet; thence North 89° 25' 15" West, 50.01 feet to a point on the easterly line of said Parcel 16, said point being North 00° 33' 56" West, 94.15 feet along said easterly line from said southeasterly corner of Parcel 16; thence South 00° 33' 56" East, 94.15 feet along said easterly line to the Point of Beginning. Pursuant to Certificate of Compliance No. 618 for Lot Line Adjustment executed by Cal Develooment. Attachment A P308 APN: 0229-401-06, 0229-401-07, 0229-401-08, and 0229-401-09 (End of Legal Description) • • • • File No.:01180-39877 Page 4 of 9 Prelim Report SCE • P309 z 7,3) __ aneddne t:10 C c '4., •-- a. (r) C -7 0 rNI GNOMON V a. Attachment B P310 -0 Q) tan - o,rrsna •--- - �; zJ 0 g O N i - ONOMM Attachment C N O O :0304404 r I,..1` N , Ot O O O O ;4 r gi- O c O O N N O N Cl)CT5 . 0 c) a • d) c 'Q) w co V N 2 • El E o o Q Q c CL 05 a o t O a ° a a� o 0) :. Uo U 4 e a--- rt O N d tx 11:4$1, 4..�f d %0 Q O r.,� i Q CZ c ca 0 { .Cl) co ' x C/) d) a) (o co 1,4„,.,:,.cf)No E T N _ .? M U as "0 L � 0) • c N as 0 Q S cd p c U cz C O 0 C • C m NT C -C T. � .0 V T cc n N @o \-,1/4 0 CV O a a .Z i ,,:; .2 i a U , �� a CD 0 n 0_ a `- +■ H ■ � '�� o K'+yfFft ` a `'. W � U C •�, N 4 cts n co cy) 0 Cz O E'cts 1 co co j j 4) T D C = -0 M> co — a) > 0 0 t /, 0 N C 0—_ p cz �. of L U N t� -5 Q }, N - 4- 0 CI gg a O O N O —CZ C o< a U n Q }' � U `Pei U (-) o uUU { • • • • S • k g1 •at P h •a+rr ' • .�. aLL `` • . .A 6 : OD CD till IC IS LL war F p amp Cl) 16:I I a -0 h ' .- ..... .1., a .: 10 .:111 , _. ' . sip 4 LI F t14+ + wok l +li A I I Ilk} • r t . . . _! t . > _ r'" -• W .• i I _';1 !, r - 1111 . ' • nG � o a- X0..1... m cv Cr II 1 s a i c t •M:> C - L 4 'r v - A It -- te •=_1 C — r - — I -- I— — I w-ax t ✓ if .r I ' 1 1 1 �1 Y [��• III 1 k C—i- 1 1 1 11 1 CD I - 03 -+___1 µ - b a• I I 1 ^^ i , c m gr oa ± -- _g a —.__ i h 22 _ ' 11 y LL + u t 1 I I I ') jI�m ig -- - I--:---- I — I be! >- I 2 a I c _ 1 1 1 is J IINEENIIMIli ' _ .... MIMI 11111111.1113k1 —...... ...... .. igNi5 — Plin i i I , I . . . • ( , r . , • '•''': . . . ... . . ........- . 'A • . .,. . i .-,,.. , i .. . ....p. , .., . . .. . ...- mi.__.. . .:... ,. .• .... 1 ... •.:-. ihriii., . ,. ,ti • . . ... , . , - • ',..'r • : , , .-.,: , - 1 - \ , , .. t , ... . . , . . .- 4f:.44•1`•-• ' \ 1 - .. 44,.."."1.10:".;•' . .- \ . .. . -:-• /., . • • . ,..!- • ... .. I...0 1 L-1.3 '.. . . , - • 11 . • • . ., . • , . • 1, • . , . 1 1111' II • •si I 1 *, • f. . . . .• 4 . . _. . , . . . . , o p r ,,,, r: Y J VJ W I k_ o O o O .O }' m cn in CD ar 074 al N U^), �. a) 7 4-P N p c p w _ c c� }, CD a--' � � a }, N C C Cid ■ C c � � 13 � '5 To C c} c c Ck= 11110 C as � U Q 'p in. = a -a%gc) ry :►P s. a as V 4< r }� p N �3 - cUC'3 - -35 � ,: � �e • • • Z y r 1 r M1 r+ Xw 3" a N� tl Y .0 !n t 113 ! ter r ! & . Y+ �.... ■iy�.. F4- ' rY�v .5' yid' S ; .i. /`�$ t Y� � �''''..::',.';',6-41,4. [ pie(, '.t�`,3��• `-��,!a A�° �+� co 06 op 4 r — in L C OD :i...ii,:y,\''x.:::,,,!... .1.,8,.V' k W f t' 0) if L4 %'� � y ":. _ 3 .'4 K45 T J' f 7.;34L X- t il F •;'.":"PArtg*igii;....4.,-Itt".' 't'',.'- . c''''''t•,t'''"'''■■P' ...-..- •-s ' '4, — : ... a s. S� . n ll.s ( ; X r ^,1-'4". x• ` �Ss Z ;:i. ; _'tlrZ i� �S.Ak i ,A 3111 n ' r""..4,--44,...r...`1",itAf,, E t t ,ti Y , ' s`' GG ':-., �' J fi, y( f� � '"',..444,,,i#. • k ..4,),..t."-,''Y c , p. gs_ ,, Jd a a z "t ate! � - tt .rr p •qtr y a tt #': __ y 1 T § L i iti 1 J 1 f ' _ e<it i ''.',4'"';F h E '�! Wit, '" {*tl fit' 'f�t .4 11 :. til k5,, `{ : i ''',44:' �`r y {,�+! 4� s .t ,��r.(' ^+}p '�'.RT >'f /i_.9 4 T F,k i.� i$ �l 5 '� t ,sl i.-,...-:.4-,_p*.:4,..,.,„1., ,,,v' ... . , , 4,,,., ,,t.,..y.. , .7, 7,,,,:,.. 4',"' Fli .�r',U7'' 4 J` �\X, +jY,_ y.e. fee " ',��+ �,� �: , t! t J 7:::,:‘,.:,.,,,..4,,..„.....„..:,.:,,o,. � N 7'r.. ( 1, t"�t .I,{,;o+'& 4 Rt� ' t: * 7 't o'� k i � -J 'A � X� u.'ir .�, k?�fit"k'. .'iF :rt,` M p y a x--•04 ,_. . t , 'ray , k `?�P'1 : �I'7n' A c''?i" ,. k x'�n' ,49i r...p. ..r '�- z �'A �.. �. 4 1 ryn `Y 7 S i' , y ot �. 0 - co W 44 oir4dnr _, ; . r 4 fps.. ,- e.4a g ygy H f x M SSy �X� W& �*,`-; 'i,'•'6 'A . .y„ ' ,, 5 .. k y,r' r Sf k ,y w A m '' s a o-: v !.k` C: 'fit ' x e ,te 4 -2 �� W a • . : A qy ,y, 4 ' 4 h 7 'ob x 's �P •.F °` TC aE'a P '" :a h 'y k .„ :'-C,r u ? ar : E ' t� y . ^r k-- ',.: _ P a;w': , s: 0 .9„4,...„.......t.,...„„,.:.„, • N ,%ry , ictliver- r g e C\I iiii 4 T C O N_ O O 4 O T 4 O N 0 - 0 N .0 El o CC o °`� C a° o c -o j ? C) C Q m as E o Q r� z c a cti a G�Q 0 ct gC)a C c' C) c' u _ d c �� 0 �, N , a 0 _c N C) ` o V > > wC4 V � 0 a O O G 0 a a K.- i - Q Q Q � • • • �; P311 STAFF REPORT itat PLANNING DEPARTMENT Lt J RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: December 17, 2014 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner Subject: CONSIDERATION OF AN URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS IN ALL ZONES IN WHICH SUCH USE IS CURRENTLY PERMITTED BY RIGHT FOR A PERIOD OF 45 DAYS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions: 1. Adopt as an urgency measure, an interim ordinance to conditionally permit new massage establishments in all zones in which the use is currently permitted by right, effective January 1, 2015. 2. Direct staff to study AB 1147 and propose permanent changes to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code affecting massage establishments for Council consideration. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Pursuant to State law, Government Code Section 65858, a city may enact an interim Zoning Ordinance on an urgency basis to protect the public safety, health, and welfare by prohibiting any use(s) that may be in conflict with a contemplated change to a city's General Plan, Specific Plan, zoning requirements, or any such change that a city is intending to study within a reasonable period of time. If approved, the interim ordinance will be effective for a period of 45 days from the date of adoption. A noticed public hearing is generally not required for the adoption of an interim ordinance. In that case, the interim ordinance may only be extended for a period of 10 months and 15 days. However, when an interim ordinance is publicly noticed prior to adoption, it may be extended for up to 22 months and 15 days, allowing the city additional time to study the contemplated land use change. Prior to the expiration of an interim ordinance, a permanent ordinance must be adopted by noticed public hearing or the land use changes included in the interim ordinance will expire. In 2008 the Governor signed into law SB 731, which established uniform regulations for massage therapy and massage establishments. This law preempted most local land use, zoning, and operational regulations provided that massage establishments and practitioners were certified by the California Massage Therapy Council. Prior to the implementation of the SB 731, massage establishments were conditionally permitted in the General Commercial zoning district Citywide and within the Village Commercial zoning district of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. In 2012, as part of our comprehensive Development P312 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT NEW MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT INTERIM ORDINANCE • December 17, 2014 Page 2 Code Update, massage establishments were permitted "by-right" in all commercial zones, as well as the Industrial Park and General Industrial zoning districts. This was done to bring the City's land use regulations on massage establishments into compliance with State law. Massage establishments have proliferated in the City since the implementation of SB 731. Prior to the required land use changes, there were seven massage establishments within the City. Currently, there are forty-two establishments. This represents a 600 percent increase in less than three years. The proliferation of massage establishments in the City is a direct result of the permissive zoning regulations required under SB 731. While most massage establishments currently operating in the City are law abiding, there is evidence in other jurisdictions that massage establishments are fronts for prostitution or human sex trafficking. On September 18, 2014, Governor Brown signed into law AB 1147 which amended the State's current massage therapy laws to expand local authority to adopt zoning regulations, business licensing, and reasonable health and safety requirements for massage establishments and practitioners. AB 1147 takes effect on January 1, 2015. Staff is recommending an interim ordinance that will continue to allow new massage establishments, but will require a City-issued conditional Use Permit for new establishments intending to operate in the City after January 1, 2015. The interim ordinance would allow the Planning staff time to study AB 1147 and develop recommendations for the City Council regarding appropriate zoning districts, entitlement requirements, and operational regulations for new massage establishments on a more permanent basis. FACTS FOR FINDING: Before the City Council can adopt an interim ordinance, the Council must find that there is an immediate threat to public safety, health, or welfare. The proliferation of massage establishments within the City presents a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. This is so because evidence in other jurisdictions suggests that some massage establishments and massage professionals may be engaged in criminal and otherwise unsafe activities and, further, that massage establishments are frequently located near incompatible uses where families typically gather(i.e., restaurants). Further development of new massage establishments without the conditional use permitting process would negatively affect the City's ability to fully study the current impacts and potential regulation of massage • establishments following the enactment of AB 1147, and would result in adverse impacts to City residents and business, constitute a nuisance to surrounding land uses, and present a threat to public health, safety, and welfare. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The project is deemed to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no probability that the proposed interim ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment because the Ordinance will impose greater limitations on development in the City, and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. CORRESPONDENCE: Notice of the public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on December 5, 2014. • • P313 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT NEW MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT INTERIM ORDINANCE December 17, 2014 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, Candyce rnett Planning Director CB:JN/ge Attachments: Interim Ordinance • • • P314 ORDINANCE NO. 872 AN INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS IN ALL ZONES IN WHICH SUCH USES ARE PERMITTED BY THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) In 2008, the California State Legislature adopted, and the Governor signed into law, Senate Bill 731, which established uniform statewide regulations pertaining to massage therapy and massage establishments (Business and Professions Code Section 4600 et seq.) (hereinafter, the "Massage Therapy Law"). More specifically, the Massage Therapy Law created a statewide system for issuing massage worker permits and shifted government regulation from local governments to a new state entity known as the California Massage Therapy Council (hereinafter, the "CAMTC"). The Massage Therapy Law preempted most local land use, zoning and operational regulations relating to massage therapists and practitioners certified by the CAMTC and massage establishments that exclusively employ certified massage therapists and practitioners. The State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 619 in 2011 and Senate Bill 1238 in 2012, which amended various provisions of the Massage Therapy Law to further limit local government authority to regulate massage. (ii) On July 16, 2012, the City Council approved a comprehensive Development Code Amendment Update, which amended the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (hereinafter, the "Code") to conform to the Massage Therapy Law. This Code Amendment permitted massage establishments "by-right" in all commercial zoning districts, as well as the Industrial Park zoning district and the General Industrial zoning district. Prior to this Code amendment, massage establishments were conditionally permitted in the General Commercial zoning district Citywide and within the Village Commercial zoning district of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. (iii) Massage establishments have proliferated in the City since the Massage Therapy Law took effect. The City had seven massage establishments prior to the Massage Therapy Law. Since that time the number of massage establishments in the City has increased to forty-two—a 600 percent increase in less than three years. The proliferation of massage establishments in the City is due, in part, to the permissive zoning regulations required under the Massage Therapy Law. Although the City Council finds that most massage establishments currently operating in the City are law abiding, there is evidence in other jurisdictions that massage establishments serve as fronts for prostitution or human sex trafficking. The potential for criminal and unsafe activity at massage establishments is particularly concerning given that some massage establishments in the City are located within proximity to places where families congregate, such as restaurants and shopping areas. (iv) On September 18, 2014, Governor Brown signed Assembly Bill 1147 (hereinafter, "AB 1147"), ' which amended the Massage Therapy Law to expand local authority to adopt zoning regulations, business licensing, and reasonable health and safety requirements for massage establishments and practitioners. More specifically, the City may now adopt and enforce zoning regulations specific to massage establishments that do not necessarily apply to all other licensed professionals. AB 1147 takes effect on January 1, 2015. (v) The City's Planning staff is presently studying AB 1147 and evaluating potential land use changes relating to massage establishments that are consistent with the Massage Therapy Law, as amended by AB 1147. The Planning Department intends to complete this study within a reasonable time P315 CITY COUNCIL ORDINACE NO. 872 NEW MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT INTERIM ORDINANCE December 17, 2014 Page 2 and the study will result in recommendations to the City Council regarding appropriate zoning districts, entitlement requirements, and operational regulations for new massage establishments. (vi) The proliferation of massage establishments in the City without due consideration through the approval of a Conditional Use Permit presents a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. This is so because evidence in other jurisdictions suggests that some massage establishments and massage professionals may be engaged in criminal and otherwise unsafe activities and, further, that massage establishments are frequently located near incompatible uses. Until the City Council can act to approve new land use regulations, the City Council desires Planning staff to review new massage establishments through the process of approving Conditional Use Permits. (vii) The development of new massage establishments without Conditional Use Permits before the City has had a sufficient opportunity to fully study the current impacts and potential regulation of massage establishments would result in adverse impacts to City residents and business, constitute a nuisance to surrounding land uses, and present a threat to public health, safety, and welfare. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct and, based on such facts and the entirety of the record before it, further finds as follows: a. The establishment and operation of any new massage establishments within the City without due consideration through the approval of a Conditional Use Permit and before the City has a chance to study current impacts and potential regulation would result in adverse impacts, constitute a nuisance, and present a risk to the public health, safety, and welfare. b. Requiring a Conditional Use Permit for new massage establishments in any zone in which such use is permitted is necessary to protect the public safety, health, and welfare. Section 2. The City Council hereby establishes an interim zoning ordinance to conditionally permit new massage establishments in all zones in which massage establishments are currently permitted. All persons desiring to establish a massage establishment in one of those zones must obtain a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 17.16.120 of the Code. For purposes of this Ordinance, the term "massage establishment" shall mean any establishment, parlor, or any room, place or institution where customers can receive a massage on any portion of the body either as a primary or accessory function. The term "new" shall mean both 1) an increase in the existing, legally established building area in which an existing massage establishment conducts business (i.e., expansion); and 2) the establishment of a new massage establishment in a new location. Section 3. This ordinance is additional to and supplemental to, and shall not affect, except as • specifically provided herein, any provision of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect without limitation. P316 CITY COUNCIL ORDINACE NO. 872 NEW MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT INTERIM ORDINANCE December 17, 2014 Page 3 Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 2015, and shall remain in effect for a period of 45 days from the date of publication in accordance with California Government Code Section 65858, and shall expire, and the prohibition established hereby shall terminate, forty-five (45) days after the date of adoption unless extended by the City Council pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858. Section 5. The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of this Ordinance, and the zoning provisions established hereby, may have a significant effect on the environment, because the Ordinance will impose greater limitations on development in the City, and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. It is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations. Section 6. Penalty. Violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) or by imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every day such a violation exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation of this Ordinance. Section 7. Civil Remedies. The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. Section 8. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17th day of December 2014, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17th day of December 2014, by the following vote: P317 CITY COUNCIL ORDINACE NO. 872 NEW MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT INTERIM ORDINANCE December 17, 2014 Page 4 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: nC W E 4.) c W cin U C CD C 4 J • W k 00 taD r ° r I • f\ (13 w c w U w 0 c >- O Q U 0 O 0 _ rl co 4= U L c>3 O O ca L �O _a UO Ni O N ao E 1 co c c N co co N v E = +-, N L 0 N .> CU 0 N co U a O> 0 U iJ �+C- 06 -Cj CO O +O-+ 5- c:3 O N 0 CO 01) O N C U CD •E O cuU L -0 c co O o O c •oE c c m 41 • L- s-C 0 Q1 N wet C 0 N N N 0 O N ro cD (7 N '+- N � � co 0 v . � E N o a) o-C ca + c N N OD cn O .bp c 5 n1 v •N c OD fp co r-1 co c6 ri c0" cm c co 00 tio CO ca ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ; ` U Q 'a c 0 -- N m A a Z+0 k■ ,-. 1 . • . 1 . . . . It . . . .. . 6 . .. IIIb 1111 , . i •. . • • ', - 0:1 ...9 . a . . a: ----- u . 1 1:1 cf r 1 c , I . . i g.c5 I o I '7101 c5 I 1 E PI III 91 L a , ) 1 i ! , ,r! Va Lib ..- .■Ni ras P . ) a; .11Miw■e F , . . W • M a m tO F I d I E s! L c \\ a Ee - ■ i 2 od .1 1 f. W w d t m I R I ; el 1 • 1 _. �- • ' fl y 1tl 1 .: T I •i 1 w �;4j�J E a , � a I � S. i �: .;! f f _ --- -_- — I — - -- -01-4- .,,-t- _- • r. , i. _- r. 1 f• f . i i' • - �_ - 1------L------_�� 2N N . O Ti \i, L1 N is n i''4 L a m ro en 1 m o E a` in N a p m t m i • .a E E ' - .� L t \ N N 111 n .0 \ W m N i, U W W ..__--__.—___——1 f0 N 2 N m N N — 2 i • • • I r.. , • • • • I � !, - /J f 1 i • • �• .— r• • • • . . • . • ~ ••• • _. • I i, • •' • • - - •• . ,7:., ,, • -- �' r — ; /-----1 . L O N N N Q) CU c N O 0 C ao CD OA N N C W N r0 03 U c +-+ C CU no (.0 C co cr -a 0 (0 c V 0 CV E 03 J v v) O 3 C c N ate+ L O C L N N O (n O O ID W N C > o .� v 3 -° (0 v, U4-' p In *' ^ cn C6 CU Q N c E C N c/3 a) 0" r-1 a E x r-I CD —0 a) 4- ,>. -c v °1 m k_ U 70 CO 'N V) C Q co C C ate+ ro 4— -0 OA N co in C O (11 E X —1 41 O c L L O OA s +-, O cn 0 v C u 7) — a1 • — E la •_ ,z, c c •z •L c c`no U Q U 4--) N U OA 2 Q N `' N ❑ 4J ❑ ❑ CO 4- m Cf) N , P318 STAFF REPORT get CITY CLERK'S OFFICE LI J RANCHO Date: December 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Debra L. McNay, MMC, Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk • Subject: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING UPDATED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution which updates existing Conflict of Interest Codes for designated personnel. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 4, 2014, through an action by the City Council, the City Clerk was directed to proceed with the biennial review of all Conflict of Interest Codes, which is a requirement of the Political Reform Act. Due to various changes of job classification titles, job responsibilities and the deletion of various positions in several departments, the attached Resolution was prepared and is submitted to update the existing Conflict of Interest Codes for City personnel. • It has been determined that the designated employees listed in Appendix"A", in addition to appointed and elected officials, make or participate in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have a material effect on economic interests. If you have any questions regarding the approval of the attached Resolution, please feel free to contact me. Respectfully submitted, • W Y D ra McNay, MMC Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk Attachments: City Council Resolution Exhibit "A" (FPPC Model Code) Appendix "A" (Designated Positions) Appendix "B" (Disclosure Categories) • P319 RESOLUTION NO. 14-222 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,ADOPTING AN UPDATED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE WHICH INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE THE STANDARD CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE PREPARED BY THE FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 12-189 A. RECITALS. (1) The Political Reform Act, Government Code Section 81000, et seq., requires the City to adopt a conflict of interest code for the City. (2) The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a Model Conflict of Interest Code (the "Model Code"). The Model Code, codified at 2 Cal. Code of Regulations Section 18730, can be incorporated by reference by the City as its conflict of interest code. That Model Code will be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission from time to time to conform to amendments to the Political Reform Act. (3) The titles of various employees and positions ih the City have been deleted, added or revised since the last adoption of an updated conflict of interest code, thereby necessitating an amendment to the City's current conflict of interest code. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Model Code, attached hereto as Exhibit"A"and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and Appendices"A"and"B" are hereby incorporated by reference and shall constitute the Conflict of Interest Code for the City. 2. Persons holding designated positions listed in Appendix"A"shall file Statements of Economic Interest pursuant to Section 5 of the Model Code with the information required for the disclosure category assigned to them and specified in Appendix "B". 3. City Council Resolution No. 12-189 is hereby repealed. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Please see the following page for formal adoption,certification and signatures P32O PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17'h day of December 2014. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor • ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of December 2014. Executed this 18'h day of December 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 2 of 15 P321 EXHIBIT "A" FPPC MODEL CODE § 18730. Provisions of Conflict of Interest Codes. (a) Incorporation by reference of the terms of this regulation along with the designation of employees and the formulation of disclosure categories in the Appendix referred to below constitute the adoption and promulgation of a conflict of interest code within the meaning of Government Code section 87300 or the amendment of a conflict of interest code within the meaning of Government Code section 87306 if the terms of this regulation are substituted for terms of a conflict of interest code already in effect. A code so amended or adopted and promulgated requires the reporting of reportable items in a manner substantially equivalent to the requirements of article 2 of chapter 7 of the Political Reform Act, Government Code sections 81000, et seq.The requirements of a conflict of interest code are in addition to other requirements of the Political Reform Act, such as the general . prohibition against conflicts of interest contained in Government Code section 87100, and to other state or local laws pertaining to conflicts of interest. (b)The terms of a conflict of interest code amended or adopted and promulgated pursuant to this regulation are as follows: (1) Section 1. Definitions. • The definitions contained in the Political Reform Act of 1974, regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission (2 Cal. Code of Regs. sections 18100, et seq.), and any amendments to the Act or regulations, are incorporated by reference into this conflict of interest code. • (2) Section 2. Designated Employees. The persons holding positions listed in the Appendix are designated employees. It has been determined that these persons make or participate in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have a material effect on economic interests. (3) Section 3. Disclosure Categories. This code does not establish any disclosure obligation for those designated employees who are also specified in Government Code section 87200 if they are designated in this code in that same capacity or if the geographical jurisdiction of this agency is the same as or is wholly included within the jurisdiction in which those persons must report their economic interests pursuant to article 2 of chapter 7 of the Political Reform Act, Government Code sections 87200, et seq. In addition, this code does not establish any disclosure obligation for any designated employees who are designated in a conflict of interest code for another agency, if all of the following apply: (A) The geographical jurisdiction of this agency is the same as or is wholly included within the jurisdiction of the other agency; (B) The disclosure assigned in the code of the other agency is the same as that required under article 2 of chapter 7 of the Political Reform Act, Government Code section 87200; and (C) The filing officer is the same for both agencies. ' Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 3 of 15 P322 Such persons are covered by this code for disqualification purposes only. With respect to all other designated employees, the disclosure categories set forth in the Appendix specify which kinds of economic interests are reportable. Such a designated employee shall disclose in his or her statement of economic interests those economic interests he or she has which are of the kind described in the disclosure categories to which he or she is assigned in the Appendix. It has been determined that the economic interests set forth in a designated employee's disclosure categories are the kinds of economic interests which he or she foreseeably can affect materially through the conduct of his or her office. (4) Section 4. Statements of Economic Interests: Place of Filing. The code reviewing body shall instruct all designated employees within its code to file statements of economic interests with the agency or with the code reviewing body, as provided by the code reviewing body in the agency's conflict of interest code. 2 (5) Section 5. Statements of Economic Interests: Time of Filing. (A) Initial Statements. All designated employees employed by the agency on the effective date of this code, as originally adopted, promulgated and approved by the code reviewing body, shall file statements within 30 days after the effective date of this code. Thereafter, each person already in a position when it is designated by an amendment to this code shall file an initial statement within 30 days after the effective date of the amendment. (B) Assuming Office Statements. All persons assuming designated positions after the effective date of this code shall file statements within 30 days after assuming the designated positions, or if subject to State Senate confirmation, 30 days after being nominated or appointed. (C)Annual Statements.All designated employees shall file statements no later than April 1. (D) Leaving Office Statements. All persons who leave designated positions shall file statements within 30 days after leaving office. (5.5) Section 5.5. Statements for Persons Who Resign Prior to Assuming Office. Any person who resigns within 12 months of initial appointment,or within 30 days of the date of notice provided by the filing officer to file an assuming office statement, is not deemed to have assumed office or left office, provided he or she did not make or participate in the making of, or use his or her position to influence any decision and did not receive or become entitled to receive any form of payment as a result of his or her appointment. Such persons shall not file either an assuming or leaving office statement. (A) Any person who resigns a position within 30 days of the date of a notice from the filing officer shall do both of the following: (1) File a written resignation with the appointing power; and (2) File a written statement with the filing officer declaring under penalty of perjury that during the period between appointment and resignation he or she did not make, participate in the making, or use the position to influence any decision of the agency or receive, or become entitled to receive, any form of payment by virtue of being appointed to the position. (6) Section 6. Contents of and Period Covered by Statements of Economic Interests. Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 4 of 15 P323 (A) Contents of Initial Statements. Initial statements shall disclose any reportable investments, interests in real property and business positions held on the effective date of the code and income received during the 12 months prior to the effective date of the code. • (B) Contents of Assuming Office Statements. Assuming office statements shall disclose any reportable investments, interests in real property and business positions held on the date of assuming office or, if subject to State Senate • confirmation or appointment, on the date of nomination, and income received during the 12 months prior to the date of assuming office or the date of being appointed or nominated, respectively. • (C) Contents of Annual Statements. Annual statements shall disclose any reportable • investments, interests in real property, income and business positions held or received during the previous calendar year provided, however, that the period covered by an employee's first annual statement shall begin on the effective date of the code or the date of assuming office whichever is later, or for a board or commission member subject to Government Code section 87302.6, the day after the closing date of the most recent statement filed by the member pursuant to 2 Cal. Code Regs. section 18754. (D) Contents of Leaving Office Statements. Leaving office statements shall disclose reportable investments, interests in real property, income and business positions held or received during the period between the closing date of the last statement filed and the date of leaving office. (7) Section 7. Manner of Reporting. • Statements of economic interests shall be made on forms prescribed by the Fair Political • Practices Commission and supplied by the agency, and shall contain the following information: (A) Investments and Real Property Disclosure. When an investment or an interest in real property3 is required to be reported,4 the statement shall contain the following: 1. A statement of the nature of the investment or interest; 2. The name of the business entity in which each investment is held, and a general description of the business activity in which the business entity is engaged; 3. The address or other precise location of the real property; 4. A statement whether the fair market value of the investment or interest in real property equals or exceeds two thousand dollars($2,000), exceeds ten thousand dollars($10,000), exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), or exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000). (B) Personal Income Disclosure. When personal income is required to be reported,5 the • statement shall contain: 1.The name and address of each source of income aggregating five hundred dollars($500) or more in value, or fifty dollars ($50) or more in value if the income was a gift, and a general description of the business activity, if any, of each source; Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 5 of 15 . . P324 2. A statement whether the aggregate value of income from each source, or in the case of a loan, the highest amount owed to each source, was one thousand dollars ($1,000) or less, greater than one thousand dollars($1,000), greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000),or greater than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000); 3. A description of the consideration, if any, for which the income was received; 4. In the case of a gift, the name, address and business activity of the donor and any intermediary through which the gift was made; a description of the gift; the amount or value of the gift; and the date on which the gift was received; 5. In the case of a loan, the annual interest rate and the security, if any, given for the loan and the term of the loan. (C) Business Entity Income Disclosure. When income of a business entity, including income of a sole proprietorship, is required to be reported,6 the statement shall contain: 1.The name, address, and general description of the business activity of the business entity; 2. The name of every person from whom the business entity received payments if the filer's pro rata share of gross receipts from such person was equal to or greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000). (D) Business Position Disclosure. When business positions are required to be reported, a designated employee shall list the name and address of each business entity in which he or she is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee,or in which he or she holds any position of management, a description of the business activity in which the business entity is engaged, and the designated employee's position with the business entity. (E) Acquisition or Disposal During Reporting Period. In the case of an annual or leaving office statement, if an investment or an interest in real property was partially or wholly acquired or disposed of during the period covered by the statement, the statement shall contain the date of acquisition or disposal. (8) Section 8. Prohibition on Receipt of Honoraria. • (A) No member of a state board or commission, and no designated employee of a state or local government agency, shall accept any honorarium from any source, if the member or employee would be required to report the receipt of income or gifts from that source on his or her statement of economic interests. This section shall not apply to any part time member of the governing board of any public institution of higher education, unless the member is also an elected official. Subdivisions (a), (b), and (c) of Government Code section 89501 shall apply to the prohibitions in this section. This section shall not limit or prohibit payments, advances,or reimbursements for travel and related lodging and subsistence authorized by Government Code section 89506. (8.1) Section 8.1 Prohibition on Receipt of Gifts in Excess of $460. (A) No member of a state board or commission, and no designated employee of a state or local government agency, shall accept gifts with a total value of more than $460 in a calendar year from any single source, if the member or employee would be required to report the receipt of income or gifts from that source on his or her statement of economic interests. • • Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 6 of 15 P325 This section shall not apply to any part time member of the governing board of any public institution of higher education, unless the member is also an elected official. Subdivisions (e), (f), and (g) of Government Code section 89503 shall apply to the prohibitions in this section. (8.2) Section 8.2. Loans to Public Officials. (A) No elected officer of a state or local government agency shall, from the date of his or her election to office through the date that he or she vacates office, receive a personal loan from any officer, employee, member, or consultant of the state or local government agency in which the elected officer holds office or over which the elected officer's agency has direction and control. (B) No public official who is exempt from the state civil service system pursuant to subdivisions (c), (d), (e), (f), and (g) of Section 4 of Article VII of the Constitution shall, while he or she holds office, receive a personal loan from any officer, employee, member, or consultant of the state or local government agency in which the public official holds office or over which the public official's agency has direction and control.This subdivision shall not apply to loans made to a public official whose duties are solely secretarial, clerical, or manual. (C) No elected officer of a state or local government agency shall, from the date of his or her election to office through the date that he or she vacates office, receive a personal loan from any person who has a contract with the state or local government agency to which that elected officer has been elected or over which that elected officer's agency has direction and control. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made by banks or other financial institutions or to any indebtedness created as part of a retail installment or credit card transaction, if the loan is made or the indebtedness created in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to the elected officer's official status. (D) No public official who is exempt from the state civil service system pursuant to subdivisions (c), (d), (e), (f), and (g) of Section 4 of Article VII of the Constitution shall, while he or she holds office, receive a personal loan from any person who has a contract with the state or local government agency to which that elected officer has been elected or over which that elected officer's agency has direction and control. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made by banks or other financial institutions or to any indebtedness created as part of a retail installment or credit card transaction, if the loan is made or the indebtedness created in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to the elected officer's official status. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made to a public official whose duties are solely secretarial, clerical, or manual. (E) This section shall not apply to the following: 1. Loans made to campaign committee of an elected officer or candidate for elective office. 2. Loans made by a public official's spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, parent-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, nephew, niece, aunt, uncle, or first cousin, or the spouse of any such persons, provided that the person making the loan is not acting as an agent or intermediary for any person not otherwise exempted under this section. 3. Loans from a person which, in the aggregate, do not exceed five hundred dollars($500)at any given time. 4. Loans made, or offered in writing, before January 1, 1998. (8.3) Section 8.3. Loan Terms. Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 7 of 15 P326 • (A) Except as set forth in subdivision (B), no elected officer of a state or local government agency shall, from the date of his or her election to office through the date he or she vacates office, receive a personal loan of five hundred dollars ($500) or more, except when the loan is in writing and clearly states the terms of the loan, including the parties to the loan agreement,date of the loan, amount of the loan,term of the loan, date or dates when payments shall be due on the loan and the amount of the payments, and the rate of interest paid on the loan. (B) This section shall not apply to the following types of loans: 1. Loans made to the campaign committee of the elected officer. 2. Loans made to the elected officer by his or her spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother,sister, parent-in-law, brother-in-law,sister-in-law, nephew, niece,aunt, uncle,or first cousin, or the spouse of any such person, provided that the person making,the loan is not acting as an agent or intermediary for any person not otherwise exempted under this section. 3. Loans made, or offered in writing, before January 1, 1998. (C) Nothing in this section shall exempt any person from any other provision of Title 9 of the Government Code. (8.4) Section 8.4. Personal Loans. (A) Except as set forth in subdivision (B), a personal loan received by any designated employee shall become a gift to the designated employee for the purposes of this section in the following circumstances: 1. If the loan has a defined date or dates for repayment, when the statute of limitations for filing an action for default has expired. 2. If the loan has no defined date or dates for repayment, when one year has elapsed from the later of the following: a. The date the loan was made. • b. The date the last payment of one hundred dollars ($100) or more was made on the loan. c.The date upon which the debtor has made payments on the loan aggregating to less than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) during the previous 12 months. (B) This section shall not apply to the following types of loans: 1. A loan made to campaign committee of an elected officer or a candidate for elective office. 2. A loan that would otherwise not be a gift as defined in this title. 3. A loan that would otherwise be a gift as set forth under subdivision (A), but on which the creditor has taken reasonable action to collect the balance due. 4. A loan that would otherwise be a gift as set forth under subdivision (A), but on which the creditor, based on reasonable business considerations, has not undertaken collection action. Except in a criminal action, a creditor who claims that a loan is not a gift on the basis of this paragraph has the burden of proving that the decision for not taking collection action was based on reasonable business considerations. Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 8 of 15 P327 5.A loan made to a debtor who has filed for bankruptcy and the loan is ultimately discharged • in bankruptcy. (C) Nothing in this section shall exempt any person from any other provisions of Title 9 of the Government Code. (9) Section 9. Disqualification. • No designated employee shall make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use his or her official position to influence the making of any governmental decision which he or she knows or has reason to know will have a reasonably foreseeable material financial effect, distinguishable from its effect on the public generally, on the official or a member of his/her immediate family or on: (A)Any business entity in which the designated employee has a director indirect investment worth two thousand dollars ($2,000) or more; (B)Any real property in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect interest worth two thousand dollars ($2,000) or more; (C) Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating five hundred dollars ($500) or more in value provided to, received by or promised to the designated employee within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made; (D) Any business entity in which the designated employee is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management; or (E)Any donor of,•or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or gifts aggregating$420 or more provided to, received by, or promised to the designated employee within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. (9.3) Section 9.3. Legally Required Participation. No designated employee shall be prevented from making or participating in the making of any decision to the extent his or her participation is legally required for the decision to be made.The fact that the vote of a designated employee who is on a voting body is needed to break a tie does not make his or her participation legally required for purposes of this section. (9.5) Section 9.5. Disqualification of State Officers and Employees. In addition to the general disqualification provisions of section 9, no state administrative official shall make, participate in making, or use his or her official position to influence any governmental decision directly relating to any contract where the state administrative official knows or has reason to know that any party to the contract is a person with whom the state administrative official, or any member of his or her immediate family has, within 12 months prior to the time when the official action is to be taken: (A) Engaged in a business transaction or transactions on terms not available to members of the public, regarding any investment or interest in real property; or (B) Engaged in a business transaction or transactions on terms not available to members of the public regarding the rendering of goods or services totaling in value one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more. • Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 9 of 15 P328 • (10) Section 10. Disclosure of Disqualifying Interest. When a designated employee determines that he or she should not make a governmental decision because he or she has a disqualifying interest in it, the determination not to act may be accompanied by disclosure of the disqualifying interest. (11) Section 11. Assistance of the Commission and Counsel. Any designated employee who is unsure of his or her duties under this code may request assistance from the Fair Political Practices Commission pursuant to Government Code section 83114 and 2 Cal. Code Regs. sections 18329 and 18329.5 or from the attorney for his or her agency, provided that nothing in this section requires the attorney for the agency to issue any formal or informal opinion. (12) Section 12. Violations. This code has the force and effect of law. Designated employees violating any provision of this code are subject to the administrative, criminal and civil sanctions provided in the Political Reform Act, Government Code sections 81 000—91014. In addition,a decision in relation to which a violation of the disqualification provisions of this code or of Government Code section 87100 or 87450 has occurred may be set aside as void pursuant to Government Code section 91003. NOTE: Authority cited: Section 83112, Government Code. Reference: Sections 87103(e), 87300 87302, 89501, 89502 and 89503, Government Code. ' Designated employees who are required to file statements of economic interests under any other agency's conflict of interest code, or under article 2 for a different jurisdiction, may expand their statement of economic interests to cover reportable interests in both jurisdictions, and file copies of this expanded statement with both entities in lieu of filing separate and distinct statements, provided that each copy of such expanded statement filed in place of an original is signed and verified by the designated employee as if it were an original. See Government Code section 81004. 2See Government Code section 81010 and 2 Cal. Code of Regs. section 18115 for the duties of filing officers and persons in agencies who make and retain copies of statements and forward the originals to the filing officer. 3For the purpose of disclosure only(not disqualification),an interest in real property does not include the principal residence of the filer. 4lnvestments and interests in real property which have a fair market value of less than . $2,000 are not investments and interests in real property within the meaning of the Political Reform Act. However, investments or interests in real property of an individual include those held by the individual's spouse and dependent children as well as a pro rata share of any investment or interest in real property of any business entity or trust in which the individual, spouse and dependent children own, in the aggregate, a direct, indirect or beneficial interest of 10 percent or greater. 5A designated employee's income includes his or her community property interest in the income of his or her spouse but does not include salary or reimbursement for expenses received from a state, local or federal government agency. 6lncome of a business entity is reportable if the direct, indirect or beneficial interest of the filer and the filer's spouse in the business entity aggregates a 10 percent or greater interest. In addition, the disclosure of persons who are clients or customers of a business entity is required only if the clients or customers are within one of the disclosure categories of the filer. Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 10 of 15 P329 APPENDIX A DESIGNATED POSITIONS Disclosure Designated Position Categories Accounting Manager- position added(new) 2, 5, 11,12 Animal Care and Services Director 2, 3, 4, 5 Animal Care Supervisor 2, 3, 4, 5 Assistant City Engineer 2, 5, 6, 7 Assistant City Manager 2, 3, 4, 5 Assistant Library Director 2,5, 15, 16 - delete position 2, 5, 6, 7 Assistant Planner-position added 2, 5, 6, 7 Assistant to the City Manager 2, 3, 4, 5 Associate Planner-position added 2, 5, 6, 7 Building & Safety Services Director 2, 5, 6, 7 Building & Safety Manager-position added(new) 2, 5, 6, 7 Building Inspection Supervisor 2, 5, 6, 7 City Attorney 1 City Clerk Services Director-position added(new) 2,5, 19,20 City Council Member 1 City Manager 1 City Treasurer 1 - delete position 2, 5, 6, 7 Communications Manager- position added(new) 2, 5, 8, 9 Community Improvement Manager- position added(new) 2, 5, 6, 7 Community Improvement Supervisor-position added(new) 2, 5, 6, 7 Community Services Director 2, 5, 8, 9 - _ -• - • - - - - - delete position 2, 5, 8, 9 Community Services Manager- position added(new) 2;5, 8, 9 Community Services Superintendent 2, 5, 8, 9 Consultant: Special Counsel 10 . Cultural Arts Manager-position added 2, 5, 8, 9 Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services 2, 3, 4, 5 Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development Services 2, 5, 6, 7 Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer 2, 5, 6, 7 Director of Public Works Services 2, 5, 17, 18 Environmental Program Manager- position added 2, 5, 6, 7 Facilities Superintendent 2, 5, 17, 18 Finance Director 2,5, 11, 12 GIS/Special Districts Manager 2,5, 13, 14 Historic Preservation Commissioner 2, 5, 6, 7 Human Resources Director 2,5, 19,20 Human Resources Manager-position added(new) 2,5, 19,20 Information Services Manager 2,5, 13, 14 Information Services Project Coordinator- position added 2,5, 13, 14 Library Board of Trustees Member 2,5, 15, 16 Library Director 2,5, 15, 16 Library Services Manager - 2,5, 15, 16 Continued on page 12 4 Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 11 of 15 P33O APPENDIX A DESIGNATED POSITIONS • Disclosure Designated Position • Categories Management Analyst III,City Manager's Office 2, 5, 13, 14 Management Analyst Ill, Administrative Services 2, 5, 13, 14 Park and Recreation Commissioner 2, 5, 8, 9 Parks/Landscape Maintenance Superintendent 2, 5, 17, 18 - delete position 2, 5, 6, 7 Planning Commissioner 1 Planning Director 2, 5, 6, 7 Planning Manager 2, 5, 6, 7 Principal Civil Engineer- position added(new) 2, 5, 6, 7 Principal Librarian 2, 5, 15, 16 Principal Management Analyst, City Manager's Office 2,5, 19,20 Principal Planner 2, 5, 6, 7 Purchasing Manager 2,5, 13, 14 Records-Manager- delete position 2,5, 19,20 Risk Management Coordinator 2,5, 19,20 Senior Buyer 2,5, 13, 14 Senior Civil Engineer 2, 5, 6, 7 Senior Park Planner- Community Services Department 2, 5, 8, 9 Senior Planner 2, 5, 6, 7 Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Superintendent 2,5, 17, 18 Traffic Engineer 2, 5, 6, 7 Utility Division Manager 2, 5, 6, 7 • • • Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 12 of 15 P331 APPENDIX B • DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES 1. Disclosure is required on FPPC Form 700 pursuant to Government Code Section 87200. No additional disclosure is required by this Conflict of Interest Code. 2. Reportable interest in Real Property in the jurisdiction. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule B). 3. Reportable Income, Loans and Business Positions (income other than gifts and travel payments). (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C). 4. Reportable Investments. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule A-1 and A2). 5. Reportable Income— Gifts —Travel Payments. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule E). 6. Reportable income, loans and business positions from persons and business entities having an interest in real property in the jurisdiction or that provide, plan to provide, or have provided within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, services within the jurisdiction subject to the inspection, review or approval of the Community Development Department. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C). 7. Reportable investments in any business entities having an interest in real property in the jurisdiction or that provide, plan to provide, or have provided within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, services within the jurisdiction subject to the inspection, approval or review of the Community Development Department. (FPPC From 700, Schedules A-1 and A-2). 8. Reportable income,loans and business positions from persons and business entities from which the City purchases, plans to purchase, or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Community Services Department. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C). 9. Reportable investments in business entities from which the City purchases, plans to purchase, or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Community Services Department(FPPC Form 700, Schedules A-1 and A-2). • Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 13 of 15 P332 10. For consultants who service in a staff capacity with the City, the consultant shall disclose based on the disclosure categories assigned elsewhere in this code for that staff position. For consultants who do not serve in a staff capacity,the following disclosure categories shall be used. Persons required to disclose in this category shall disclose pursuant to categories A, B, C and D below unless the Department Director determines in writing that a particular consultant is hired to perform a range of duties that is limited in scope and thus is not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirements in categories A, B, C and D. Such written determination shall include a description of the consultant's duties and, based upon that description, a statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. The Department Director's determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this conflict of interest code. • A. Reportable interests in real property in the jurisdiction. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule B) B. Reportable income, loans and business positions. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C) C. Reportable investments. (FPPC Form 700, Schedules A-1 and A- 2) D. Reportable Income - gifts and travel payments. (FPPC Form 700, Schedules D and El 11. Reportable income, loans and business positions from any financial institution in which the City deposits funds, plans to deposit funds, or has deposited funds within two years prior to the time any statement is required under this conflict of interest code. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C) 12. Reportable investments in any financial institution in which the City deposits funds, plans to deposit funds, or has deposited funds within two years prior to the time any statement is required under this conflict of interest code (FPPC Form 700, Schedules A-1 and A-2. 13. Reportable income,.loans and business positions from persons and business entities from which the City purchases, plans to purchase, or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Administrative Services Department. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C) Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 14 of 15 • P333 • 14. Reportable investments in business entities from which the City purchases, plans to purchase, or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Administrative Services Department. (FPPC Form 700, Schedules A-1 and A-2) 15. Reportable income, loans and business positions from persons and business entities from which the Library purchases, plans to purchase, or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Library. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C) 16. Reportable investments in business entities from which the Library purchases, plans to purchase, or has purchases within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Library. (FPPC Form 700, Schedules A-1 and A-2) 17. Reportable income, loans and business positions from persons and business entities having an interest in real property in the jurisdiction or that provide, plan to provide, or have provided within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, services within the jurisdiction subject to the inspection;review or approval of the Public Works Services Department of the Community Development Department. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C) 18. Reportable investments in any business entities having an interest in real property in the jurisdiction or that provide, plan to provide, or have provided within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, services within the jurisdiction subject to the inspection, approval or review of the Public Works Services Department of the Community Development Department. (FPPC Form 700, Schedules A-1 and A-2) • 19. Reportable income, loans and business positions from persons and business entities from which the Administration Department purchases, plans to purchase,or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control the Administrative Services Department. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C) 20. Reportable investments in business entities from which the Administrative Services • Department purchases, plans to purchase, or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Administration Services Department. (FPPC Form 700 Schedules A-1 and.A-2). • Resolution No. 14-xxx - Page 15 of 15 • December 17,2014 I Item 1.14.—Continued to Wednesday,January 21,2015 I No Statt Heport submitted for the Agenda i r 0 NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING • At is regular meeting held on December 17, 2014,the City Council of City of Rancho Cucamonga continued the following item, Item Q4., to its meeting to be held on January 21, 2015. Q4. Approval of proposed Fee Amendments for Various City Departments amending Resolution No. 12- 196, 06-142, 07-048, 08-210, 79-1, 99-146, 14-191. RESOLUTION NO. 14-223 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE FOR APPLICABLE TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER VARIOUS MUNICIPAL SERVICES, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 12-196,06-142,07-048,08-210,79-1,99-146, 14-191. The meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center 9; located at 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730-3801. Said continuance was passed by the following vote: AYES: Alexander, Kennedy, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None DATED: Thursday, December 18, 2014 // i Zi.��L ��—. Adrian Garcia, CMC Assistant City Clerk C. December 17.2014 I Item 04.—Continued to Wednesday.January 21,2015 City Council Meeting No Staff Report was submitted for the Agenda P334 STAFF REPORT _ , ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: December 17, 2014 �A RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Tiffany I. Cooper, Management Analyst II Subject: SIX-MONTH STATUS UPDATE FOR THE PAID PARKING PROGRAM IN CUCAMONGA CANYON AND THE METROLINK STATION. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND In June 2014, staff implemented the first of two paid parking programs. The reservation paid parking program on Almond Street for access to Cucamonga Canyon was implemented with the intent of creating a reservation based parking program that would limit the amount of parking along Almond Street and provide visitors a sense of reassurance of having a parking space without creating excess traffic and disturbing the adjacent neighborhood. Prior to the implementation of the reservation-parking program, this area drew an estimated 200 visitors a day during the fall season and more during the spring and summer months. On July 1, 2014, the Metrolink paid parking program was implemented. Commuters parking in the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink parking lot were required to obtain either a monthly or a daily parking permit in order to avoid receiving a parking citation. Funds collected from the sale of permits would help offset the cost of maintaining the parking lots. ANALYSIS Both parking programs have been in effect for approximately six months. During this time, the reservation program in the Cucamonga Canyon area has shown to be effective by reducing the number of complaints and the amount of vehicles parking along Almond Street. Today, we have received approximately 207 reservations in six months, with no reported parking violations or vehicles being towed. Parking reservations for Cucamonga Canyon are made through the City's dedicated paid parking website: www.ParkRancho.com. Prior to implementing the paid parking program at the Metrolink station, staff observed daily parking utilization to be at approximately 75-80%. Upon implementation of permit parking, there appeared to be a slight reduction in the number of commuters parking at the station. However, within a few months the parking numbers were back to the original capacity of 75-80%. Parking permits for Metrolink can be obtained three different ways: 1) online at www.ParkRancho.com, 2) daily permits can be purchased at the Pay Point machine located at the station, and 3) if paying by cash, patrons can come into City Hall during business hours to purchase monthly or daily permits. The Police Department is actively enforcing the parking at the Metrolink by driving through twice a day and issuing citations for non-permitted vehicles. PD has reported that over 650 citations have been issued to commuters without permits. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT - STATUS UPDATE FOR THE PAID PARKING PROGRAM P335 December 17, 2014 Page 2 • With every new program, there will be some challenges that staff will continue to monitor and address. The first issue was the "Park by Phone" mobile application. Staff initially thought this application would be a popular way for patrons to pay for their parking permit. After six months, the City only received two . permits via the mobile application and decided to cancel this service. The second issue is the enforcement communication between the onsite pay point machine and the license plate database. Currently, patrons purchasing a permit at the Pay Point station are required to print and place the permit on the dash versus the license plate number automatically being added to the Police Department's daily enforcement database. Staff will continue to look at alternative ways to address this issue. There were four main benefits to implementing the permit parking program at the Metrolink: 1) continuing to provide on-site security, 2) increased police presence, 3) continuing to provide a safe and clean environment, and 4) installing cameras in both lots. At this time each benefit is being maintained and staff is researching the expense of installing cameras beginning next fiscal year. To date, staff has collected approximately $98,000 from the sale of Metrolink monthly and daily parking permits. On average, the City receives approximately $15,000 a month from permits purchased through www.ParkRancho.com and $2,300 a month from the Pay Point machine. Currently, the City budgets approximately $250,000 to maintain the Metrolink parking lots. Staff estimates that at the current rate of monthly permits sold, the City will recover approximately seventy-six (76%) percent of the budgeted amount. Respectfullyrsu miffed, • ark ..Ste r Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer YIrN. CB:,33 :, r z 0 f;t ' °ZSZO � I 111:1( NI.. 'fft k Z V � � ■ Q � = J Q n OO z a �ii, �cic,„ . ... , . i 00 Q rs_.,._, . , act. C) J ' O gliC Q } ir { 1 0 CTS N a CD aS = W ■ CC LI LI o a) Q ■ Z N .1■0 N > M CD C N ■ l ' � � C\ E L cz o � ,a m oi c • - 0 o Cl. o o T N o it a J . Fy . , f -- < o �z .CZ � a ' C O °.).- cro ,'I,tc,,I.f, ' .0,0/1;',',.0„,e, 111 0›C ;I ��O E N V{J mse z > P R O, S }L R } H - O i _ 0 3 C Z CZ `V O co O Q Oc33t O U O) 1- O)•Q f: a _,>-.ao� 3 G� s Y ~ rJ O " ID i�t C OO Q U /�/��� N c� „ � W W 3 k^ tw i� k V/ r, w.dy +e� CD CD N U N A O C 1 �k „ N _ r J C O U (ts O * ...=... r et. : r:?. Q as ii �= x z Lj _ o 07-, � � py 1 ,iI o { Z 6X...3 {y t ityj` l � 1� •.. w %-. p C i a) c/ CD (1) O U ci a) O % O t = V Ca x � a) E C C a) ,mil a ,��: �('�y '%. i C 0) � jio VZK `P.4 CO Q a) O C i O �a4Li) 0 c c a) . a O i a) ( , 0 CL� a < CCn5 °) fr cn C •■ U (1) E p p - (d 1_ co NI- > p co Q N > p Y N 0 C al -E C Q Z p >, N U p cz as p c� i- p - > c� i 7 p =� n O (0N N 4.i 0 • N u) •=C p p CV 1- c.) o oci al 0-rig 4 'led rte 0 4 c Co W i C U � �. U) > a, N 2 c ci �cn — w0 8 as a) C ' 4)-1,,, � � c CCtUcn A A ifitisi ec co as L. E • CO O Z ° Z ., y, t o a j P n Cr W — i- W CC C Z UI CC s a I >. a z4• Z 3 :Ti, o o • ZN c am _ I- Ui iCC 2 ( O O O C] 0 0 CO Li, Tr C/ N suopnaaseEJ 10 JegwnN .'. C'fr x4 W ` n^ ,, .- CV W all C c o u ai .E o) L (}[�I Q W xk#r^fi" . ..,cts -Cli a -0 CO �{ w S I— Z T CD cti ,1 O E NO U A o c E o Q : o E c c� 4 , U) 5 _C .- _) — o y . >1 c cn Om c � c Z ▪c▪ � ° � � J - c CO a� c ,T.) c E o cn cn o O 2 - i W o c 2 ' o La 0) c '� ° W a a, = c O c Zoo 1. C�P4 va o o as 2111 4.01% ' ( w 0 cm zx y — E r t" yi \ i 'i 5 �� F $pr '°" L - 4 4. 'a"g .18 Ay n e ;n g g !, `F fr °;w. 5 f i C $ { Z Ca N 5 ._ , ,, . r O Q •Q ', '� c CD C co Y Q Q ■ O O c I . i C C� N Q Q a O a U O Z � c 03 03■ -0 > 1 Q `.. O > ^ i ° CC U moo 3:: W " n ' ° c� "0 - . V , -, '; o CC - 5 • 0 a o t. t W n �1. 1 S �' �? 3 2 o� gQg' j 16 5 ` Q , , �t "i!aIIIa4' .∎ a 35: a�, .4-6 •1° g • ily , .n. ..arovA �„, t Z O O °1 O c cts V 0 CC U C CO • a � i. . z a CO Ct ■ o 0 co i F 4 g H a o c i U E (n { ± �' co co ak a a - . 0_ n CZ e; 0 O H 0_ 73 r N CO >+ >+ 1 O C N ,--k 1 N co t. -t:, *t Ikpl CO r•e,„ •E' ''ff 7) go a '.. Z cc lV •L C Y/ t le l :,-;115[1.= .d 7:i 0 Y •■ �_ { �_ — 1 : - :.1 Z_ °' _I }C' C � Q C O IMM Q U C ;;:-.2.4,`) 'FIJI' +r Q O 0 �, Om _ 3 O0 O 0 O 0 Z 0 Y ao 0 _ o O O t et W iV m C3 C tr Om cp_ as ;4= �,. U _� C C = 0) •17 ! HH C ftli ( D X 0 ". . I . 'r. .. , , : a,., 03"- ,-„,,,„.:... - ,)Lik . . 4, ,__: ... 7 $41-1 . . . . . , Z ► ' 4; ... I • W Y 0 a 05 ..t ,' ,,,,.:, .. .. . ::: 1‘‘.i,''I'''\'-'' .'- ' 0 0 •'. 0 .I, . r4 ... :. Z ■Il . - ____. . 1L) Ug _ z ..V :::.31 qt < 0 : ' ., .. til 1 ( CC , :. ,..',. w 1 (440"-it ' #17, 2 .. > 9% o mo2 1 \ 1-k v♦W 1st, a as J o 4 S Q 6 a t,W � aIP — Cl)V `'�� 4 '- Job, m J 0 4 J� Z 5 �' QJ9 C p a' mot, y 5 G E g°Ir' C) a �4a Y 3. `mot' .�r -e 1 —'�' a9 O ■L, Z � % ,...._. i J O tia O O I CC a CD 90d O - W Ott JO > 'ir" Ja O IX( u_ 9� Q U s �j ')6 V t. i �_.�i aG'n o0 o oo o oo oo 00 oo o 0 rn co r` CD LO Tr M N 1- .f4P711-64 ___ PPS sla){ail to aagWnN . y z, r'r $104 w to v o co r $,, y N 7 1 r :J/:-/r,1,1,2:):11 n 0 ■ d _fa N V N cr V Q \ a t xi N V M CO i?. J W CO r D F- Nw 4. Z Y/ 3 co N (7 3 0 a CO CO it e ' I H zCN. Ci ; J W g7 0 0. Y , W Cg r .W toil ZVa tyr fa4 00 a • a 4a n !! C U al 0 E a is �� CC Z =F E y co 1L M o CC o _. el C w.1' n .;W aC Z .0a m d O: ■ a w y CC Q 0 y aW a c J , r. Q N Eci N N r. I 0 Z C 7 4 Y Y 1:�J v 7/ 2 N to {,d 2 C d�` i 0. o Z co) T° d Q U C'l�( 0 L N N CD M M Co 1 N w CO N N C R 2 s to C w > N 0 • L >. Z c • C o �§ j MI w I d m ` E N w J W o CM p a f- 1 IA cp 01 VI C m 1 � C Z C °' _a 1 W a N M N C �_ = C Cl) r N O DI W v p ¢ 000 o O7 a I N 0 0, 7 N 7PRo d o > ((�—F r M p - L cg• o/ Ego O C � 0 I�1 io E c CI ` , W U V OA Z ct as �] 4.. .� N C Q a Old 0 co (0 o as V�0 0 I I 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 � �. "` N G co,ui {R `• to to faa 40 Il anuenaa Motion 0/ C 70 a) cm a) ��;�y T N (l cz C L c a) (l C6 c� c a) W a � 1� o U U V O 76 0 Cl) � .. 0 -I- CD a) co D Es r U CO Q) — `� O Ti Q >, = C O • �. o ai RS W p te a) , 0_ � O p N = O = c C O CD `" . -CD U C C a) r3 sk; Z O c as �C > E L a)•C' Q C E C cc 1�•� c , Z i Y V _c -1.-. Q U a) >+ U O ? 0 D 0 C O O }' cn a) C O V cp T( O O C n C C O . � - O U i i O ° c I— a a) cli I O D n � o t a) c as Z c W U p O .- uC) C ° 2 cn W -a 2 C V � � o � n C L _ CC O C O E `d Oc CZ -6 U O7 0 E C 0 Rte° O }' +r l_A CZ��J � O Q fn � © a - CE �, � �_ v �CC O O Q 1 0 O Q O jU O Crj o a) oc� 4,07A1 , o -0 Cri al KIWI' " a) a a Ff 12 i 1. . miffs rY x ,,l a i i Z 0 I Cl) 1 —I .£` . 1 1 V Z 0 0 w y Zf �i d Y. S a > .� : 1 lit Q v e 'fly • • A�,..p uf��'��yy..;� yfer a<__ • rQ x M,.,49: lvf`k £YA i U) 1, • z 0 mow III V / w D C/ 0 ea k ra2,1 .14 , VAR P336 STAFF REPORT h CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Date: December 17, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Debra L. McNay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager • Subject: REVIEW OF APPOINTMENTS TO STANDING COMMITTEES AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES • RECOMMENDATION Review the list of appointments to committees and other governmental agencies and update as 'necessary. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS • On a regular basis, the City Council reviews the list of appointments to various standing committees and other governmental agencies, and updates as necessary. Pursuant to prior City Council action, there is an automatic designation of the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem or remaining Council Members as automatic alternates to any Committee or Subcommittee when one or more of the appointees are • unable to attend. This ensures that the Committee or Subcommittee can continue to hold a scheduled public meeting without interruption. The following is a list of the committees and the current appointment(s): Ad Hoc Committees • Refuse Service Levels and Illegal Dumping Ad Hoc Committee — Sam Spagnolo and Diane Williams • LMD Citizen's Oversight Committee — One representative from Public Works Subcommittee and one representative from Community Services Subcommittee Standing Committees • Mobile Home Accord Renewal — Sam Spagnolo and Bill Alexander (Accord scheduled for • renewal in 2015) City Council Subcommittees • Community Services Subcommittee — L. Dennis Michael and Sam Spagnolo • Library Subcommittee— Bill Alexander and Diane Williams • Community Development/Historic Preservation Subcommittee — Bill Alexander and Diane Williams • Public Works Subcommittee — Bill Alexander and Diane Williams • Economic Development Marketing Subcommittee - Marc Steinorth and Diane Williams • Technology and Communications Subcommittee - Sam Spagnolo and Marc Steinorth • P337 REVIEW OF APPOINTMENTS TO STANDING COMMITTEES AND OTHER PAGE 2 GOVERNMENTAL.AGENCIES DECEMBER 17,2014 Other Appointments • League of California Inland Empire Legislative Task Force • Representative- Marc Steinorth • Inland Empire Utilities Agency- Landscape Alliance Task Force Member, Task Force - L. Dennis Michael • City Selection Committee Required Delegate: Mayor • ConFire Board of Directors Board Member Marc Steinorth Alternate: Diane Williams • Omnitrans Delegate: Sam Spagnolo Alternate: Bill Alexander • Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce Delegate: L. Dennis Michael Alternate: Marc Steinorth • Route 210 Freeway Corridor Design Joint Powers Authority Delegate: Diane Williams Alternate: Sam Spagnolo • SANBAG Delegate: L. Dennis Michael Alternate: Diane Williams • North Etiwanda Preserve (Appointment by County Supervisor) Delegate: Sam Spagnolo Alternate: Bill Alexander It is recommended that the City Council review the list of current committee and other governmental agency appointments and update as necessary. Upon receipt of an updated list, City Staff will notify any outside agencies that might be affected. Res ectfully submitted, . • dc-:2, 1..„....--"Debra McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager