Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/04/20 - Agenda Packet - (2) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 24, 1989 ~TION C(]I~(ENTS TO: Residential/Institutional Design Review Committee Larry McNiel 1977 Bruce Emerick Otto Kroutil David Blakesley (Alternate) FROM: Debra Meier, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING OF APRIL 20, 1989 The following is a description of projects which require review and rating by the Design Review Committee. Please review the attached plans, visit the project sites, and write down your conments using the blank space provided under each project on the attached sheets. After the meeting, the consensus of the Committee 's concerns will be typed up as the formal action/recommendation of the Committee and distributed to the Conmission and Council. As always, feel free to contact the appropriate project manager (noted in parentheses along the left margin), prior to the meeting date, if you have specific questions related to the scheduled projects. Dinner will be provided between 5:00 5:30 p.m., Consent Calendar items will be reviewed between 5:30 p.m. 6:00 p.m., with the first design review item being heard at 6:00 p.m. Please notify our department if you will be unable to attend the meeting, or if you will be late, so that the dinner can be properly ordered and the necessa~ arrangements made. 5:O0 -5:30 D INNER 6:00- 6:30 (Cindy) DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13566 - CENTURY AMERICAN - The Design Review of building elevations and ~ site plan for a previously approved Tentative Tract Map consisting of 75 single family lots on 28.7 acres of land in the Low Density Residential District at the south side of 24th Street and north of Lower Loop Road. Associated with this application is Tree Removal Permit 89-21. 6:30- 7:00 (Steve) MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-13 - REEL/GROBMAN The development of 5 silos, 3 water cooling towers and a raised building addition for an existing industrial complex on 7:29 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, north of 4th Street - APN: 210-071-59. RELATED FILES: DR 87-31, MDR 88-58, MDR 89-05. DESIGN REVIEW AGENDA APRIL 20,1989 Page 2 7:00 - 7:30 (Tom) DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 12462 - WATT - Design Review of building el evations and detailed site plan for a previously approved Tract Map consisting of 27 single family lots on 17 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) located on the south side of Summit Avenue, east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 225-181-02 and 03. 7:30 - 8:30 (Bev) ENVIROI~IENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14139 AHMANSON - A residential Subdivision of 119 single t~ll~"lots on 54 acres of land in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 1 ocated at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 25th Street - APN: 225-082-01. 8:30 (Jeff) AWARDS OF DESIGN EXCELLENCE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA - A Planning Commission workshop to determine the award finalists to be presented at the 3rd Annual Awards of Design Excellence May 8, 1989. ):mlg Attachments CC: Planning Conmission/City Council Re si dentia 1 / In st itu tiona 1 CONSENT CALENDAR ITE1qS AGENDA April 20, 1989 1. 1R 13742 LA CHANCO (Cindy) Review wall color. Committee Action: Due to concerns regarding graffiti, the Comnittee approved the request to paint the decorative perimeter walls subject to the following: 1. The wall should be painted to math the natural mission slump stone color. 2. All of the required slump stone walls should be painted to match and all sides of the wall should be painted. 2. lR 13565 STANDARD PACIFIC (Beverly) Review: 1. Wall cap detail. 2. Entr~ sign modification and lighting. Comittee Action: The Comittee {Kroutil, Emerick) approved the revised lettering and lighting scheme. However, they did not approve the change of cap detail and preferred to remain with the approved cap detail. The lighting scheme should be consistent with City standards. 3. 1R 13823 - DEVCAL (Bruce) Review building colors. Committee Action: The Committee examined samples of the proposed building materials and colors with the original submittal and approved the proposed color changes. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 6:00- 6:30 Cindy April 20, 1989 DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13566 - CENll/RY AMERICAN - The Design Review of building elevations and detailed site plan for a previously approved Tentative Tract Map consisting of 75 single family lots on 28.7 acres of land in the Low Density Residential District at the south side of 24th Street and north of Lower Loop Road. Associated with this application is Tree Removal Permit 89-21. Staff Coaments: Century American is proposing to develop the second half of an approved tract. Due to the manner in which the two halves have been phased, the new product will be intermixed with the approved units in several instances. Therefore, the applicant is proposing a landscape and architectural treatment which is similar to that previously appreved. (See attached). The following is a list of concerns and/or conments which should be addressed by the Design Review Committee: Arc h i te c tu re: 1. Due to structural similarity between elevations, a modified roof design should be used on one or more elevations. (For example, provide a hip roof on Plans 1B and 2B). 2. Provide a decorative sunburst truss under the gable roofs on Victorian elevations. 3. Use a decorative scalloped shingle under the gable roof on Victorian elevations (1D, 3D). 4. Garage door pattern on Plans 4A should have a more rectangular design and shape. 5. Continue banding treatment around side elevations of the California Ranch elevations 1A and 2A. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Otto Kroutil, Bruce Emerick Staff Planner: Cindy Norris 1. Provide a modified roof design (hip, clipped gable, etc.) on two elevations of Plan 1. 2. Provide a decorative sunburst truss under the gable roofs on the Victorian elevations. In addition, the truss elements should have a more substantial appearance. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS I'F 13566 - CENTURY AMERICAN APRIL 20, 1989 Page 2 3. Provide a decorative scalloped shingle under the gable roof on Victorian elevations, (iD, 3D). 4. Additional architectural detailing should be adeed to the 1st and 2nd story garage walls adjacent to the front entry for elevations A and C of Plans 3 and 4. 5. Provide decorative chimney cap details on all elevations. The detailing should match the architectural treatment, including either trim or masonry banding. 6. Relocate the driveway on lot 98 farther to the west. 7. Applicant should work with staff to revise plans prior to scheduling Planning Commission. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 6:30 - 7:00 Steve April 20, 1989 MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-13 - REEL/GROBMAN - The development of 5 silos, 3 water cooling towers and a raised building addition for an existing industrial complex on 7.29 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, north of 4th Street - APN: 210-071-59. RELATED FILES: DR 87-31, MDR 88-58, MDR 89-05. Background: The overall project (Turner Industrial Park) was originally approved by the Planning Commission on September 23, 1987. The applicant for the above referenced project is requesting to raise a section of Building C and utilize silos and water coolers. Originally, this application was reviewed and approved with conditions by the Planning Division on January 3, 1989 as Minor Development Review 88-58, which called for eight (8) silos of 50 feet to be located to the west of Building C, directly behind the middle portion of this building. This portion of the building was proposed to be raised from 30 feet to 50 feet. On January 9, 1989, the applicant requested modifications to the original approval under Minor Development Review 89-05. This application was for eight (8) silos of 60 feet and a section of Building C to be raised in height from 30 feet to 60 feet. Also, the southern most section of Building C was now proposed to be utilized, thereby modifying the original request. This application was deemed incomplete and never pursued further by the applicant. On March 15, 1989, the applicant requested additional modifications, which make up Minor Development Review 89-13. The applicant is requesting to raise a portion of the southern most section of Building C from 30 feet to 42 feet and to add five (5) 60 foot silos and three (3) water cooling towers directly to the west of the aforementioned addition. The Design Review Conmittee reviewed Minor Development Review 89-13 as a Consent Calendar item on April 6, 1989 and did not recommend approval as presented. The Conmittee felt that this particular site may be inappropriate for this type of equipment. Staff Coaments: All application materials will be provided at the meeting. The applicants will provide additional information as needed. Oesign Review Committee Action: Members Present: David Blakesley, Bruce Emerick, Otto Kroutil Staff Planner: Steve Hayes DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS MDR 89-13- REEL/GROBMAN APRIL 20, 1989 Page 2 The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the original Minor Development Review (MDR 88-58) with the following modifications: 1. The southernmost section of Building "C" will now be utilized for the operation. Said section shall be raised to 50 feet with 8 fifty foot silos placed directly to the west of this section. 2. Three (3) water cooling towers shall be included as part of this approval. Said towers shall be placed directly south of the silos and wast of Building "C". 3. All mechanical equipment for the water cooling towers shall be screened from view through the use of a chain link fence with slating. Said slating shall be painted to match the colors of the building, silos and water cooling towers. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00- 7:30 Tom April 20, 1989 DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 12462 - WATT Design Review of building elevations and detailed site plan for a previously approved Tract Map consisting of 27 single family lots on 17 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) located on the south side of Sunmit Avenue, east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 225-181-02 and 03. Site Plan: 1. Continuation of solid wall along the roar of Lots 1, 11, 16 and 27. 2. Corner side yard solid walls on Lots 2, 3 and 10. Architecture: 1. Provide greater use of traditional/rural building styles and materials consistent with the requiroments of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (Sections 5.42.202 and 5.42.602-). 2. Expansion of 360 degree architectural treatment (i.e., stone, brick, rough sawn wood, etc.). 3. Four units (approximately 15%) should provide a two-car garage and bonus room rather than a throe-car garage. Oesign Review Comittee ~ction: Members Present: David Blakesley, Bruce Emerick, Otto Kroutil Staff Planner: Tom Grahn The Design Review Conmittee roviewed the project, but did not roconmend approval due to the following concerns: Site Plan: 1. Lots 1, 11, 16 and 27 should be provided with solid corner side yard and roturn walls. 2. The solid wall should be provided along the roar of lot I extending from the community trail to the gate leading from the local equestrian trail. 3. The solid wall should be provided along the roar of lots 11 and 16. 4. Design of the solid wall should include natural stone pilasters, stucco finish, and a decorative cap. 5. P.V.C. equestrian trail fencing should be provided along the front property line of lots 13, 14, and 15. DESIGN REVIEW COHMENTS T 12462 - WAI'F APRIL 20, 1989 Page 2 Architecture: 1, The diagonal siding on the garage door of Elevation 520 should be replaced with horizontal and/or vertical siding. 2. The standing brick should be removed from the chimney of Elevation 520A, and should be replaced with more con~patible building material, i .e., rough sawn wood. 3. Elevation 521B should incorporate standing brick on the chimney, to match the front elevation. 4. The pink and green color samples were not acceptable and should be replaced with compatible earth toned colors. 5. A decorative finish should be provided on all driveways. The applicant was directed to return to the Committee on a Consent Calendar basis. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:30 - 8:00 Bev April 20, 1989 ENVIRO~4ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14139 AHMANSON A residential s~bdivision of 119 single family lots on 54 acres of land in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 25th Street APN: 225-082-01. The Design Review Conmittee (Kroutil, Emerick, McNiel ) initial ly reviewed the project on Manch 30, 1989. At that time the Committee had the following concerns: 1. The width of the paseos, particularly Lots A and B, should be increased to 30 feet. However, the width may vary. 2. Masonry wall on either side of the paseos should not extent to the curb. Wrought iron railings may be used to define the paseo if desired. 3. The connection to Etiwanda Avenue should be maintained to provide a connection to the proposed community trail. 4. The perimeter wall design for Etiwanda Avenue should be revised to reflect the proposed design scheme outlined in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. 5. A paseo connection to Tract 13527 to the south should be incorporated between Lots 13 and 14. Steps can be utilized if necessary. 6. A bridge should be incorporated in the northern and western portions of the tract to provide access across the proposed drainage easement. The bridge should be of permanent materials and designed to be strong enough to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian traffic only. 7. An e~anced parkway should be provided on one side of Streets A, D and F. The parkway may contain additional street trees, shrubs and/or groundcover. This area will be homeowner maintained. Revised design sketches will be presented at the Design Review Committee meeting for your review. Oesign Review Comittee Action: Members Present: Otto Kroutil, David Blakesley, Bruce Emerick Staff Planner: Beverly Hissen The Design Review Comnittee approved the project with following conditions: DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS II 14139- AMMANSON APRIL 20, 1989 Page 2 1. The design of the perimeter wall along Etiwanda Avenue as well as the streetscape should be designed in conformance with policies and standards set forth in the proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Drawings should be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Comnittee prior to the recordation of the Tract Map. 2. A temporary fence such as chain link should be placed across the paseo connection to Tract 13527 to the south until such time as that tract develops. 3. The enhanced parkway treatment along Streets A, D and F should be redesigned to include a double row of clustered trees. The design should be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Comnittee prior to the recordation of the Tract Map. 4. The ownership of the slope located along the south tract boundary should be transferred to the southerly property owner prior to recordation of the map. If this is not feasible, an exclusive yard easement or some other acceptable mechanism should be agreed upon prior to map recordation. Installing gates in the wall to provide for homeowner access is not considered to be an acceptable so 1 u ti on. 5. Masonry walls along the paseo edges should be provided and should be terminated at the setback line. Some type of low visual barrier may extend to the curb where appropriate.