Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/09/07 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: September 11, 1989 ACTION CO[~MENTS TO: Conm~ercial/Industrial Design Review Committee Suzanne Chitlea Peter Tolstoy Dan Coleman Betsy Weinberger (Alternate) FROM: Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW COMMITFEE MEETING OF September 7~ 1989 The following is a description of projects which require review and rating by the Design Review Committee. Please review the attached plans, visit the project sites, and write down your comments using the blank space provided under each project on the attached sheets. After the meeting, the consensus of the Committee's concerns will be typed up as the formal action/recommendation of the Committee and distributed to the Commission and Council. As always, feel free to contact the appropriate project manager (noted in parentheses along the left margin), prior to the meeting date, if you have specific questions related to the scheduled projects. Dinner will be provided between 5:00 - 5:30 p.m., Consent Calendar items will be reviewed between 5:30 p.m. - 6:00 p.m., with the first design review item being heard at 6:00 p.m. Please notify our department if you will be unable to attend the meeting, or if you will be late, so that the dinner can be properly ordered and the necessary arrangements made. 6:00 - 6:30 (Bruce) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-49 - AJA/BENNETT - The development of 40 acres of Industrial Master Plan consisting of 18 lots in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located at the west side of Hermosa Avenue south of 22nd Street. APN: 209-211-30, 31, 17 and 13. 6:30 - 7:00 (Vince) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-20 - GRACE RESTAURANT COMPANY - The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for a 6,100 square foot restaurant within an existing commercial shopping center in Terra Vista Planned Community located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Base Line Road. APN: 1076-~1-31. BA:mlg Attachments cc: Planning Commission/City Council COI4HERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL CONSENT CALENDAR ITEHS AGENDA September 7, 1989 1. MDR 8g-23 - SIMMONS CABLE (Vince) Review revised elevations. Committee Action: The revised elevations were approved as presented. 2. CUP 88-35 - HUGHES INVEST. {Steve H.} Review of proposed bulkhead material. Committee Action: The Committee approved the material change of the bulkheads from ceremic tile to fishscale wood siding as presented. The Committee again expressed the need for angular pop- outs for all storefront entries with additional articulation above the entrances. It was suggested that the white color be carried up the front of the building, thereby, unifying the storefronts. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 6:00 - 6:30 Bruce Septe~er 7, 1989 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-49 - AJA/BENNETT - The development of 40 acres of Industrial Master Plan consisting of 18 lots in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located at the west side of Hermosa Avenue south of 22nd Street. APN: 209-211-30, 31, 17 and 13. Background: The proposal for a 40 acre industrial development master plan was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Suzanne Chitiea, Peter Tolstoy and Dan Coleman) on April 20, 1989. During that meeting the Committee recommended that development guidelines for the future construction on the lots be submitted to the Design Review Committee for review and approval. The Committee also recommended that revised plans be resubmitted for review prior to scheduling for the Planning Commission. The revised plans should include: 1. Buildings on north side of 7th Street should provide greater building setback variation. 2. Rail service should be inclusive of all lots along the south and west project boundary. 3. Buildings size should be increased to accommodate rail service usage. 4. Landscape planters and/or tree wells should be included within all parking areas and along the sides of all buildings. 5. Development/Design Guidelines should be revised and submitted for review. On June 22, 1989, the Design Review Committee examined the Design Guidelines for the proposed industrial master plan. The Committee (Suzanne Chitlea, Peter Tolstoy and Dan Coleman) recommended that: 1. The Design Guidelines for Bixby Business Park be utilized as an example for the Bennett Consolidated Master Plan Design Guidelines. 2. Additional text and revisions to existing text be provided according to Planning Division requirements. 3. Additional graphics and revised page layout be provided according to Planning Division direction. After the additional information, graphics and revisions are complete, the Guidelines should be resubmitted to staff for review prior to scheduling for Design Review Committee. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DR 87-49 - AJA/BENNETT Page 2 Staff Comments: The applicant has resubmitted the Design Guidelines and revised plans as requested. The Committee should examine the plans and design guidelines in order to determine if the Committee's recommendations for revision and additional information have been satisfactorily completed. Staff feels that there are many areas of the design guidelines which have been greatly clarified through revised text and additional graphics. However, some minor revisions still remain. Staff will review the revisions with the Committee and recommends that the guidelines be resubmitted to staff for review and approval prior to scheduling for Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Suzanne Chitiea, Peter Tolstoy, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Bruce Abbott The Design Review Committee examined the revised plans for the proposed master plan and determined that the plans met those revisions as recommended during the April 20, 1989 meeting. The Committee also reviewed the Design Guidelines for completion utilizing the Design Guidelines for Bixby Business Park as an example. The Committee determined that additional text, revised page layout, and revisions to the existing text be provided according to Planning Division requirements. Additional and revised graphics were also recommended as follows: 1. Master site plan indicating conceptual use of the proposed Building Color Palette so that no calico color effect occurs, adjoining building colors blend well and that a complimentary conceptual color mix occurs. 2. Photos or refined sketches of consistent building styles showing: a cohesive direction for linear or vertical building design, glass, colors, building geometry and building massing. 3. Sketches including plan view of monument signs indicating geometrical planting scheme, a closer tie with architecture (form/color) and a 24 square foot sign area. The Design Review Committee recommended that the Design Guidelines be reviewed as a full item at the next meeting. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 6:30 - 7:00 Vince September 7, 1989 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-20 - GRACE RESTAURANT COMPANY The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for a 6,100 square foot restaurant within an existing commercial shopping center in Terra Vista Planned Community located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Base Line Road. APN: 1076-481-31. Background: This is the last freestanding pad in the Terra Vista Village to be submitted for design review. Coco's Restaurant is scheduled to be the tenant. Staff Comments: Site Plan: 1. The main entrance should be relocated to the southeast corner of the building in order to relate to the plaza. Architecture: 1. More detail should be added to the east elevation below the proposed sign. 2. The roof should be wrapped around the south and west elevations. 3. West elevation should have enhanced treatment such as spandrel or vision glass. 4. The columns should be brought around to the north elevation or spandrel glass should be used. 5. A detail of the canopy section should be provided. Design Review Comnittee Action: Members Present: Suzanne Chitlea, Peter Tolstoy, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Vince Bettoni The Committee did not approve the project as proposed. The following items should be addressed by the applicant in revised plans for additional Committee review. 1. Decorative panel doors should be used on the south and west elevations. 2. Field tile insets should be added to the south and west elevations. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DR 89-20 - GRACE RESTAURANT COMPANY Page 2 3. The service entrance should be screened by a 4 foot wall with planters using Burger King to the north as an example. 4. The wall adjacent to the entrance should be enhanced with an architectural element(s) such as the quadrafoils used in the center. 5. The Cantera columns should be brought around to the north elevation or spandrel glass should be used as a window element. 6. The parapet finish should be stucco on the north elevation. 7. A mission style wing wall should be used at the west terminus of the greenhouse on the north elevation. 8. The greenhouse element style should be less contemporary, such as the greenhouse at the Edwards Mansion in Redlands 9. Use a rust color on cornice to match the rest of the center. 10. Spanish style tile accents should match the rest of the center. 11. Delete landscaping on revised building elevations. CO)~4ERCIAL/INOUSTRIAL CONSENT CALENDAR ITE)tS AGENDA September 21, 1989 1. DR 87-56 - DAVIES DEVELOPMENT (Vince) Review of proposed colors. Committee Action: 2. DR88-04 - CARNEY ARCHITECTS {Bruce) Review of proposed paving materials and colors. Committee Action: 3. DR 87-19 - LENNON ARCHITECTS (Tom) Review revised building elevations. Committee Action: 4. TRACT 13886 & CUP 88-01 - BARMAKIAN (Bey) Review of roof material. Committee Action: