HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/07/17 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAM~0NGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 21, 1986 ACTION AGENDA
TO: Com~erci al / I ndustri al 1977
Design Review Co~ittee Dennis Stout
Suzanne Chitlea
Brad Bul 1 er
Dave Barker (A1 ternate)
FROM: Nancy Fon9, Associate Planner
SU~ECT: DESIGN REVIEW CO~I~EE MEETING OF JULY 17, 1986
The following is a description of projects which require review and
rating by the Design Review Committee. P1 ease review the attached
plans, visit the project sites, and write down your comments using the
blank space provided under each project on the attached sheets. After
the meeting, the consensus of the Committee's concerns will be typed up
as the formal action/recommendation of the Committee and distributed to
the Commission and Council.
As always, feel free to contact the appropriate project manager (noted
in parentheses along the left margin), prior to the meeting date, if you
have specific questions related to the scheduled projects. Dinner will
be provided between 5:00 - 5:30 p.m., Consent Calendar items will be
reviewed between 5:30 p.m. 6:00 p.m., with the first design review
item being heard at 6:00 p.m. Please notify our department if you will
be unable to attend the meeting, or if you will be late, so that the
dinner can be properly ordered and the necessary arrangements made.
6:00 - 6:30
(Dino) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-18
- L & M DEVELOPMENT - The development of a 40,000 sq.
ft. office building on 1.7 acres of land within the
Office professional District located on the south
side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Turner Avenue -
APN 208-331-30.
6:30 - 7:00
(Dino) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-17
VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK - The development of a
14,000 sq. ft. office addition to an existing 4,800
sq. ft. building on 1.44 acres of land within the
General Commercial District located at the northwest
corner of Foothill Boulevard and Klusman Avenue - APN
208-15-01.
DRC Meeting Agenda
Commercial/Indust~
July 17, 1986
page 2
7:00 - 7:30
(Dino) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
B5-36 - TARGET STORES - The establishment of a
temporary office trailer as an ancillary use to an
existing warehouse facility on 6.4 acres of land
within the General Industrial/Rail Served (Subarea
10) District located on the east side of pittsburg
Avenue, between Newport Drive and 7th Street - APN
229-26-46.
NF:ns
Attachments
CC: planning Commission/CitY Council
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
6:00 - 6:30 Dino July 17, 1986
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-18 - L & M
acres of land within the Office professional District located on the
south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Turner Avenue - APN 208-331-
30.
Design parameters
The project site i's a 1.7 acre vacant parcel between two developed
sites: Michael J's on the west side, and Kindercare on the east side.
The site grade is approximately 6 to 8 feet lower than Foothill
Boulevard and slopes gradually southward.
At the May 14, 1986 planning Commission meeting, the Commission
determined the proposed use to be consis'tent with the Foothill Corridor
Interim policies.
Issues
The proposed architecture for Foothill Boulevard is a critical issue
with respect to the Foothill Corridor Interim policies. The policy goal
is to design an image which is sensitive to the heritage of Rancho
Cucamonga. The architect has submitted a written statement (attached)
of architectural intent, indicating how the project relates to the
heritage of Rancho Cucamonga, for your review. The applicant has placed
greater architectural emphasis to the interior project site elevations
as opposed to an =equal" emphasis to the Foothill Boulevard elevation.
The P1 arming Commission indicated some "fine-tuning" was necessary to
achieve the design goal for Foothill Boulevard.
Staff Coe~aent~
Architecture:
1. The east and south building elevations best represent and
capture some of the architectural design elements which relate
to the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga, such as the use of vine
arbors, wineberry and desert-tan colors, and riverrock.
A1 though the primary emphasis of these features are presented
in the east and south building elevations, it is equally
important to sufficiently reflect these elements along Foothill
Boulevard. It is recommended that vine arbor planting be
incorporated into the Foothill Boulevard north building
elevation as well as the west building elevation (Michael j's),
with the accent handrail at the patio areas. In addition, the
proposed riverrock should be incorporated into the landscape
area along Foothill Boulevard. Further, it is recommended that
a climbing vine (Ficus pumila) be planted at the base of the
tower element.
Oesi gn Review Comments
DR 86-18 - L & M Development
duly 17, 1986 - Page Two
Site Plan: The straight pedestrian walk through the center of the
~arking 16~ is boarded by a 2 foot strip of landscaping on each side of
the walk. It is recommended that the pedestrian walk be designed to
meander to (1) create larger staggered landscape pockets, and (2)
improve pedestrian access from adjacent parking spaces (see Exhibit
"A" )o
Landscaping:
1. The original plan presented to the planning Commission
for preliminary review on May 14, 1986 indicated that the
building was designed to retain the landscaped area along
Foothill Boulevard, the~creening the first level
parking and raising the landscaped area to be seen from
public view. The applicant is now proposing to slope
this'area from the public right-of-way at Foothill 6 to 8
feet down to the base of the parking level thereby
exposing the parking area and hiding the landscaping (see
Exhibit "B"). It is recommended that a combination of
berming and riverrock walls be used to screen the first
level parking and raise this landscape area to full view.
2. The west building elevation is designed similar to the Foothill
elevation (north) in which the side property line landscaping
slopes from the property line 3 to 4 feet down to the base of
the parking level (see Exhibit "C"). Again, this design
exposes the parking area and prevents full view of the
landscaped area. It is recommended that the landscaped area
along the west property line be retained at a minimum level
adjacent to grade in order to increase p~rking area screening
and bring the landscape area into full view.
3. provide a combination of tree and bushy shrubs (e.g., Purple
Hopseed) on slope along the west and north property lines.
Design ReviewCoem~nts
Members Present: Herman Rempel, Dave Barker, Brad Bullet
Staff planner: Dino putrino
The Design Review Committee recommends the following:
1. planters be incorporated into the Foothill Boulevard north
building elevation as well as the west building elevation with
the accent handrail at the patio areas similar to the east and
south building elevations.
2. Riverrock be incorporated into the landscape area along
Foothill Boulevard.
Design Review Comments
DR 86-18 - L & M Development
july 17, 1986 -- Page Three
3. Climbing vine (Ficus Pumula) be planted at the base of the
tower element along Foothill Boulevard.
4. Build up the 45 foot landscape area along Foothill Boulevard to
be seen from public view and screen first level parking.
5. provide pictures of other projects which use the same roof tile
product for Planning Commission review.
6. Landscape area along the west property line be raised and
retained at the same level as the existing grade to the west in
order to increase parking area screening and bring the
landscaping area into full view.
7. Increase landscape area width along the east property line from
two (2) to five (5) feet.
8. pedestrian walk through the center of the parking lot be
designed to meander with landscape pockets (see Exhibit "A"
presented in DRC comments).
SONNY L. MASCARENAS,A.I.A.,ARCHITECT
June 18, 1986
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Department
9320 Baseline Rd. Suite C
Rancho cucamonga, CA 91730
Attn: Dino Putrino
Dear Dino,
We are submitting our project, the RANCH0 FOOTHILL
pROFESSIONAL CENTER, for design review. As you know, the
project is in the Foothill Corridor district and therefore
requires various architectural elements reflecting the
heritage of Rancho Cucamonga. We are sensitive to these
concerns, and have blended together architectural components
which we feel will relate to the history indigenous to this
area'What is Rancho Cucamonga? It is an area blessed with
a strong sense of history, and abounds with historical homes
and buildings whose roots are deeply imbedded in the grape
vineyards and wine industry. This is the city's basic theme,
and is reflected in various residential and commercial land
uses'Considering our site is within close proximity to two
historical landmark wineries, our building will include such
materials as a mauve, flat concrete tile roof; a desert-tan
plaster exterior; wineberry accent colors; and a generous
amount of trellised vine arbors. We are using river-rock in
many landscaped seating areas and suggest curved parapet walls
to recall other historical architectural features.
We have made a strong attempt to incorporate many archi-
tectural elements that comprise the historical character of
Cucamonga and the surrounding areas.
ARCHITECTURE · PLANNING · INTERtORS
415W. Foothill BIvd.,Claremont,Ca91711 phone(714) 626-4428
· ~ Page 2
Thank you for the good working relationship we have had
on this project. If you would like further clarification of
our design intent, or have any further questions, please feel
free to call me.
Sincerely,
SONNY MAS RENAS ARCHITECTS
~ RESL.M~N~
Sonny L Mascarenas, A.I.A.
SLM/am
cc: L & M Development
file
I
L-~ EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCH
DRAINAGE DITCH
' 238.98'
RANCHO CUCAMONGA T~TLE: t, ~ u
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: A SCALE: ~ ~1~
SITE SECTION B
CITY OF ITEM= ~
PLANNING DIVISION : ~'
MECH. EQUIP-
LEASE SPACE
LEASE SPACE
MICHAEL J'S
,-"'-"~ ~
~' i PARKING
..... -*:.. ~. . ..
CITY OF ~TE,x,b , t , I
RANCHO CUCAMONGA X'~'~.T..~
PLANNING DIVISION SCALE:
DESIGN REVIEW COM~4ENTS
6:30 - 7:00 Dino July 17, 1986
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-17 VINEYARD
NATIONAL BANK - The development of a 14,000 sq. ft. office addition to
an existing 4,800 sq. ft. building on 1.44 acres of land within the
General Commercial District located at the northwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Klusman Avenue - APN 208-15-01.
Design parameters
The site consists of the building previously occupied by Wilmington
Savings & Loan. The rear portion of the site is vacant. Vineyard
National Bank proposes to add 14,000 sq. ft. to the existing bank,
expand and renovate on-site and off-site improvements.
At the january 8, 1986 planning Commissi on meeting, the Commissi on
reviewed the preliminary plans and determined that the proposed use is
consistent with the Foothill Corridor Interim policies, subject to
addressing the development guidelines contained within the Interim
policies.
Staff Comments
Site Plan:
1. The proposed plan indicates that the existing trash
enclosure will remain in its existing location at the end
of the main drive aisle view corridor. It is recommended
that the trash enclosure area be relocated approximately
10 to 15 feet south of the existing/proposed location and
replace the existing trash enclosure area with
landscaping to enhance the end of aisle view.
2. A sidewalk is proposed along and adjacent to the south
side of the building from the public sidewalk on Klusman
Avenue to the front entrance and from the proposed drive-
thru lanes to the front entrance. The sidewalk appears
redundant due to the proximity of the public sidewalk
along Foothill Boulevard. It is recommended that this
access be eliminated.
3. The employee plaza area is located in the middle of the
parking area and consists of three (3} 8 foot concrete
benches incorporated in a landscaped pedestrian walk
area. It is recommended that the plaza area be relocated
within the 1 andscaped area adjacent to the northwest
corner of the proposed two story addition to allow closer
accessibility and a more pleasant environment (see
Exhibit "A"). This area should include seating, tables,
and trellis with vine planting for shading purposes.
Design Review Comments
DR 86-17 - Vineyard Nat'l Bank
July 17, 1986 -- Page Two
Architecture: The Foothill Corridor Interim Policies require that the
architecture of new construction shall be sensitive to the heritage of
Rancho Cucamonga. Design elements may include, but are not limited to,
riverrock/fieldstone walls, exposed beamwork, vine arbors, curved
parapet walls, and covered walkways or arcades. According to the
applicant, the proposed architecture is a contemporary interpretation of
these design elements. The applicant suggested that the earth-tone
brick veneer, brown metal fascias and arches could be considered by the
Committee as contemporary expressions of heritage el ements.
1. Is the proposed contemporary design sensitive to the
heritage of Rancho Cucamonga?
2. The equipment and trash enclosure gates are proposed to
be redwood. It is recommended that these gates be
designed to match the proposed roof element in material
(metal) and color (dark brown anodized) for compatibility
and durability.
3. A vine covered arbor could be provided at the main
entrance and/or plaza area on north elevation to
introduce an element of the Rancho Cucamonga heritage.
Landscape: The conceptual design landscape plan meets the quality
desired tor a commercial use.
1. Berming and meandering sidewalk should be provided per Special
Boulevard policies for Foothill Boulevard.
2. Additional specimen size trees should be provided along
Foothill.
Design ReviewCmittee Action
Members Present: Herman Rempel, Dave Barker, Brad Bull er
Staff Planner: Dino PutrinD
The Design Review Committee recommends the following:
1. Design the Foothill Boulevard drive approach to direct vehicles
to make right turns only.
2. Design a plaza around the automatic teller machine located at
the northeast corner of the proposed 2 story building (within
building column element) to include decorative low profile
seating wall and trellis cover.
Design Review Comments
DR 86-17 - Vineyard Nat'l Bank
July 17, 1986 -- Page Three
3. Provide a written statement describing the relationship of the
proposed project design to the Rancho Cucamonga heritage for
Planning Commission review.
4. Replace building rear wing walls with trellis cover.
5. Design future wall signage on single story building area.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 - 7:30 Dino July 17, 1986
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-36 - TARGET
STORES - The establishment of a temporary office trailer as an ancillary
use tF6 an existing warehouse facility on 6.4 acres of land within the
General Industrial/Rail Served (Subarea 10) District located on the east
side of Pittsburg Avenue, between Newport Drive and 7th Street - APN
229-26-46.
Design Parameters
This item is the result of code enforcement. The proposed trailer is
used as office space and occupied by three (3) employees. The trailer
has been parked across four parking stalls due to the proximity to an
electrical supply from a pump house and out of the main traffic flow.
(See Exhibit "A". Photos to be presented at the July 17, 1986 DRC
Meeting.)
The trailer is needed due to increase in work volume. Target is
currently in construction stages of a 1 arger permanent facility in
Fontaria and scheduled to move in by February 1988 at which time the
temporary office trailer would be removed.
Staff Coments
Site Plan: An alternative location for the trailer to be considered is
on the north side of the adjacent north wall of the proposed location
(see Exhibit "A"). The trailer would be completely screened located on
the north side of the wall, however, the office use would be less
accessible to the main traffic flow.
1. Should the proposed trailer be located at an alternative
location as suggested above?
Landscaping: Provide potted trees and exterior plants along the south
trailer elevation base.
Architecture: The trailer does not have a skirt at its base. It is
recommended that a skirt be added to the base of the trail er in order to
screen the trailer supports.
Oesign Review Comnents
Members Present: Herman Rempel, Dave Barker, Brad Buller
Staff Planner: Dino PutrinD
Design Review Comments
CUP 85-36 - Target Stores
july 17, 1986 -- Page Two
The Design Review Committee recommends the following:
1. Architecturally integrated skirt be added to the base of the
trailer in order to screen the trailer supports.
2. Provide potted trees and exterior plants along the south
trailer elevation base.
3. Limit Conditional Use Permit to one year or Target's vacancy of
the premises, whichever comes first.