HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985/04/18 - Agenda Packet H AM NA
CITY OF RANC 0 CUC 0 G
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 23, 1985
TO: Design Review Committee
FROM:
SUBJECT:
ACTION AGENDA
1977
Herman Rempel
Rick Gomez
Dennis Stout
Suzanne Chitiea (Alternate)
Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING OF APRIL 18, 1985
The following is a description of projects which require review and
rating by the Design Review Committee. Please review the attached
plans, visit the project sites, and write down your comments using the
blank space provided under each project on the attached sheets. After
the meeting, the consensus of the Committee's concerns will be typed up
as the formal action/recommendation of the Committee and distributed to
the Commission and Council.
As always, feel free to contact the appropriate project manager (noted
in parentheses along the left margin), prior to the meeting date, if you
have specific questions related to the scheduled projects. Dinner will
be provided between 5:00 - 5:30 p.m., Consent Calendar items will be
reviewed between 5:30 p.m. - 6:00 p.m., with the first design review
item being heard at 6:00 p.m. Please notify our department if you will
be unable to attend the meeting, or if you will be late, so that the
dinner can be properly ordered and the necessary arrangements made.
6:00 - 6:30 (Dino) CUP 84-23 ~ PERRYMAN
6:30 - 7:00 (Curt) TT 11853 - BARRATT
7:00 - 7:30 (Nancy) CUP 85-05 - PAULEY
7:30 - 8:00 (Howard) CUP 85-07 - FISHER
NF:cv
Attachments
CC: Planning Commission
City Council
Dan Coleman, Planning Division
Joe Stofa, Paul Rogeau,
Loyd Goolsby, Barrye Hanson
Y
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS AGENDA
April 18, 1985
DR 84-46 - PONDEROSA STEAKHOUSE
(Nancy)
Review of new color scheme.
Committee Action: The Committee recommended that the roof color
shall be of bronze-burgundy or flat green to match Dan Salter's
project adjacent to K-Mart. The Committee recommended that
architectural approval should be obtained from the Architectural
Review Board of the Commerical Center.
CUP 84-16 - ASSURED MINI-STORAGE
(Howard)
Revised elevation.
Conm~ittee Action: The Committee stated that the applicant has
redesigned the project to address the concerns of the Planning
Commission. The Committee stated that this project should be
forwarded to the full Planning Commission for review, to consider if
the re-design has met those concerns and complied with the
Industrial Specific Plan.
CUP 85-02 - CHURCH OF LATTER DAY
SAINTS (Howard)
Revised elevations.
Conm~ittee Action: The Committee stated that the massive roof line
should be broken up to create more interest through a smaller roof,
or a clear story.
TT 12914 - MATT KOOYMAN
(Howard)
Design of block wall and
additional elevations.
Co~m~ittee Action: The Committee recommended approval of the design
of the block wall and the additional elevations.
TT 12090 - USA PROPERTIES
(Curt)
Tot-lot location and gate
design.
Committee Action: The Committee stated that the tot-lot location
and the gate designed shall be constructed per the original approved
plans.
DR 84-56 - MESSENGER
(Rick)
Discussions on Condition
of Approval.
Cmm~ittee Action: The Committee recommended that cantilever
treatment should be provided for both front corners and that the
entire plaza area could be changed to broom finished concrete with
stamped concrete borders.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
6:00 - 6:30 Dino
April 18, 1985
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-23 PERRYMAN - The
conversion of a 1,500 square foot single family residence into a private
school with a 5,038 square foot addition on one (1) acre of land in the Low
Residential District (2-4 du/ac), located at 9038 Base Line Road between Beryl
and Garnet Streets - APN 202-231-30.
Design Parameters: The important issues to be considered are parking,
circulation, landscaping, and "use to lot" compatibility. Note that the
proposed conversion of a residential structure must meet all code requirements
for commercial development as follows:
Site Plan:
Day care facilities require one parking stall for each staff
member, plus one for each five (5) children. The applicant has
not given a definite indication of the maximum number of
students and employees which would occupy the project; thus, it
appears that the proposed number of parking stalls is not
sufficient. In addition, the proposed second phase (addition)
may require increased parking.
Interior side property line building setback is twenty (20)
feet adjacent to residential zoned property. The proposed site
plan indicates the second phase addition with a side setback of
five (5) feet, fifteen-feet less than the twenty-foot
requirement.
Landscaping:
The average streetscape landscaping is forty-five (45) feet
from the ultimate face of curb. Since the driveway and parking
area encroach into the streetscape setback area, the proposed
project does not average 45-feet of average landscaping in this
area, as required.
One tree per three (3) parking stalls and a five (5) foot
landscape strip is required within the parking areas. The
proposed parking areas do not include the above described
landscaping requirements. Further, one tree per 30 linear feet
of building (existing and proposed), is required adjacent to
these buildings. The proposed landscape plan does not indicate
this requirement.
Little landscaping has been provided and the project does not meet the minimum
landscape requirements.
The proposed project will require a variance application procedure. Due to
the constraints of a narrow lot and an existing structure, it is difficult to
design the proposed school and meet all code requirements. The project site
conditions restrict the type of use on the subject lot and limits its
compatibility. It is determined that the proposed use is not suitable for the
project site.
Design Review Co~mnittee Action:
Members Present:
Staff Planner: Dino PutrinD
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
6:30 - 7:00 Curt April 18, 1985
DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11853 - DALY A request to revise the
building elevations for Tentative Tract 11853 consisting of 72 condominium
units on 5.71 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 du/ac),
located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona Avenue - APN 202-171-42.
Design Parameters: The subject tract was approved in 1981 and will expire
this October. The purpose for the architectural revisions is to accommodate
new floor plans. The approved elevations are contemporary in character with
attractive, clean lines. The revisions basically include the addition of
standard gable roofs on the left side and rear elevations; use of stucco
versus horizontal siding; and expanded window treatment. The following are
Staff comments:
The proposed gable roofs interject a more traditional
architectural element to the contemporary roof lines of the
approved elevations. To provide a consistent desi9n character,
further revisions to complete the traditional appearance or a
reversion back to the original style is suggested.
The use of horizontal sidin9 should be expanded or adjusted to
a more attractive pattern, particularly on the left side
elevation.
Design Review Co~mnittee Action:
Members Present:
Staff Planner: Curt Johnson
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 - 7:30 Nancy
April 18, 1985
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-05 PAULEY - The
development of a mini-warehouse facility consisting of 6 buildings and a
caretaker's quarters totaling 125,730 square feet on 4.5 acres of land in the
Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9) located at the northwest
corner of Utica Avenue and 8th Street - APN 209-143-04.
Design Parameters: The project site is vacant
Vegetation consists of indigenous weeds and shrubs.
the Haven Avenue Overlay District to the west side.
and relatively level.
The project site abutts
Staff Comments
Site Plan: The overall site plan complies with the intent of
the ISP and provides for a transition of land use intensity
from Haven Avenue to the Heavy Industrial.
Landscaping: The landscaping plan could be enhanced through
the following:
a. Special landscape treatment along Utica Avenue.
Expand the landscape openings to the west property
boundary.
Provide landscaping to the rail easement at the
north property boundary and the developer should
work with the SPRR in obtaining approval for such
landscaping.
Elevation: The west elevation of Building D should be enhanced by additional
architectural treatment as it will be visible from Haven Avenue.
Design Review Comnittee Action:
Members Present:
Staff Planner: Nancy Fong
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:30 - 8:00 Howard April 18, 1985
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-07 - DAN FISHER -
Construction of a auto-repair building with office totaling 3,167 square feet
on .25 acres of land in the General Commercial District located north of Base
Line, or the west side of Roberds Street - APN 202~092-009.
Design Parameters: Presently, two buildings in poor condition occupy the
subject site. The applicant has indicated that he intends to demolish both
buildings and completely clear the subject site. The site presents various
problems for commercial development due to its irregular configuration and lot
size. Therefore, in order to meet commercial development guidelines, the
applicant is proposing zero-lot line technique, abutting his proposal against
and existing one-story building on the southwesterly property line. In
addition, the applicant has filed a variance request in conjunction with this
proposal for reduction of the front setback.
Site Plan: Building placement upon this irregular shaped lot presents the
optimal siting possible given access and parking considerations. The only
recommended adjustment to site plan by Staff involves the redesign or re-
location of the last parkin9 space adjacent to the rear property line to
improve interior circulation.
Architecture: The proposed design elevations are somewhat boxy and need
relief such as a small wooden or metal mansard, wrapped around the top of the
building.
Landscaping Plan: Staff recommends the following changes to enhance the
project design:
Utilize small (2 foot) planter box along the east elevation of
the building.
2. Provide 5 canopy type trees along the northwesterly and
northeasterly property line.
3. Utilize flowering ground cover on each side of entrance.
Design Revie~Co~ittee Action:
Members Present:
Staff Planner: Howard Fields