HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985/06/06 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCH0 CUCA~0NGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 21, 1985
TO: Design Review Committee
FROM:
SUBJECT:
COMMITTEE/M~TIO~
Herman Rempel
Rick Gomez
Dennis Stout
>
1977
Suzanne Chitiea (Alternate)
Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 6, 1985
The following is a description of projects which require review and
rating by the Design Review Committee. Please review the attached
plans, visit the project sites, and write down your comments using the
blank space provided under each project on the attached sheets. After
the meeting, the consensus of the Committee's concerns will be typed up
as the formal action/recommendation of the Committee and distributed to
the Commission and Council.
As always, feel free to contact the appropriate project manager (noted
in parentheses along the left margin), prior to the meeting date, if you
have specific questions related to the scheduled projects. Dinner will
be provided between 5:00 5:30 p.m., Consent Calendar items will be
reviewed between 5:30 p.m. 6:00 p.m., with the first design review
item being heard at 6:00 p.m. Please notify our department if you will
be unable to attend the meeting, or if you will be late, so that the
dinner can be properly ordered and the necessary arrangements made.
6:00 - 6:30 (Curt)
6:30 - 7:00 (Curt) CUP 83-08
7:00 - 7:30 (Nancy) TT 11893
7:30 - 8:00 (Nancy) TT 12969
8:00 - 8:30 (Howard) DR 85-14
8:30 - 9:00 (Howard) CUP 85-15
VICTORIA VINEYARDS SOUTH
LEWIS/TACO BELL
PLAZA BUILDERS
YAZEDJIAN
GILBERT AJA & ASSOCIATES
STRICKLAND
NF:cv
Attachments
CC:
Planning Commission
City Council
Dan Coleman, Planning Division
Joe Stofa, Paul Rogeau,
Loyd Goolsby, Barrye Hanson
Y
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS AGENDA
June 6, 1985
DR 85-09 - DEL TACO
( Howard )
Committee Action:
Review of revised elevation.
The Committee viewed the color of the
corporate logo as unacceptable. Instead,
they decided on a burnt orange color/with
more brown in order to tone down the
bright orange color. Also, the Committee
wanted a tile or slate roof as long as the
roof is compatible with the entire center.
DR 85-12 - SPIRES
(Howard}
Committee Action:
Review of revised elevation.
The Committee wanted the quadro-foil
recessed on the north/south elevations
near the Spires I.D. sign.
VICTORIA DAY CREEK BRIDGE
(Barrye}
Committee Action:
Review of the design of the Day Creek
Bridge.
The Committee was concerned with the
removal of median, perhaps traffic barrier
is needed. Traiq crossing and patrol
roads should go under the street. More
cross sections should be provided for
further Committee review.
DR 84-48 - PACIFIC SCENE
(Nancy}
Committee Action:
Review of new color scheme and building
entrance.
The Committee recommended the original
approved color scheme and building
entrance.
CUP 84-28 - HUMPHREY TRUCKING
(Nancy)
Committee Action:
Request for a time frame for off-site and
on-site improvements.
The Committee recommended a time limit of
2 years for off-site and certain on-site
improvement. Applicant should work with
Engineering Division regarding the details
for bonding such off-site improvements.
6:00 - 6:30
REVIEW COt~ITTEE COJ
Curt/Bruce June 6, 1985
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Area Development Plan for Victoria Vineyards
South - A conceptual development plan for south Victoria Vineyards
Village, a 117.4 acre portion of the Victoria Planned Community,
located on the north side of Base Line Read, between Milliken and
Rochester, south of the Pacific Electric. railroad ~racts.
PLEASE CHECK "YES" IF IT IS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN
YES NO
. ~.'Si!t..PLAN:
Building Orientation
Open Space
Parking Location
Pedestrian Amenities
Site Coverage
Storage/Loading Areas
ARCHITECTURE:
Recognizable Theme '
Scale, Mass, Height
Harmonious Style/Form
Materials/Color
Variation/Interest
Roof Screens
YES NO
' : CIRCULATION:
Z Access Location
/ Street Pattern Variation
/ Pedestrian Access
Emergency Access
Z Vehicle Stacking
Z Back-up & Turn Around
r~IGtIBORHOOD
COMPATIBILITY
Neighborhood Character
Density Transition
Buffering/Screening
Grading
Land Use Conflict
Noise
Corner Side/Rear Upgrade // Traffic
Streetscape / Natural Topography Maintained
Enhance Architecture / Grading Minimized
Tree Preservation ~ Contoured Slopes
Screening/Buffering Slope Heights/Gradient
Shade Parking Lot ~ Vistas Preserved
.S]ope P]an~ing Views Into Site
DESIGN REVIEW COltII~EE ACTION
Recommended approval subject to the following conditions of ai~proval:
Recommended that the project be revised for additional Committee review
as follows:
Did not recommend approval as follows:",
Park to be .5 acres in size and relocated to the ~rtheast
corner of "Loop Road" and ~toop Entry Road" with an
east/west orientation.
A trail focal point or node on the south side of "Loop
Road" is required to align with the east side of "Loop
Entry Road".
3. Revise the Land-Use plan to locate Medium-High
Residential at the northeast corner of Base Line and
Milliken.
4. Medium Residential at Base Line and Rochester is
satisfactory.
5. Alternatives should be explored as to the appropriate
land use to "wrap around" the park site's north and east
perimeter.
6. Interior trail connections to the railroad track are not
required.
6:30 - 7:00
REVIEW COffiIITTEE COJ
Curt June 6, 1985
TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-08 - LEWIS - The development
of a 377,665 square foot shopping center includinn,'a drive-through
restaurant on 8.67 acres of land in the General C~nm~ercial District
located at the southeast corner of Foothill and Hellman.-- APN.208-261~.25,?6~
This project was continued from May 16. Revised plans will be presented at
the meeting. Please see the attached DRC Action of 5-16-85.
PLEASE CHECK "YES" IF IT IS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN
YES NO YES NO
,S.I~ PLAN:'. ) ~ '!
Building Orientation /
Open Space
Parking Location /
Pedestrian ~enities
Site Coverage
Storage/Loading Areas
ARCli [TECRIllE:
Recognizable Theme
Scale, Mass, Height
Harmonious Style/Form
Materials/Color
Variation/Interest
Roof Screens
Cor~r.~.~e__/~a__r._Ug.~rade
LAfiDSCAPING:
Streetscape
Enhance Architecture
Tree Preservation
Screening/Buffering
Shade Parking Lot
£]ape P]antin~ * *:
CIRCULATION:
Access Location
Street Pattern Variation
Pedestrian'Access
Emergency Access
Vehicle Stacking
Back-up & Turn Around
r .... ....... ...............
~ N_IGIIBORHOOD
........CORP, ATZBZL[TY
Neighborhood Character
Density Transition
Buffering/Screening
Grading
Land Use Conflict
Noise
Traffic
GRADING:
Natural Topography Maintained
Grading Minimized
Contoured Slopes
Slope Heights/Gradient
~is~a,s Preserved
Views Into Site
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITFEE ACTION
['~ Recommended approval subject to the following conditions of approval:
[~7) Recommended that the project be revised for additional Committee revi~,w
- as follows:
[] Did not recommend approval as follows:",
Provide an expanded pedestrian area fron~ and center of
the main tenant building by realigning the drive aisle
northerly.
Create secondary pedestrian focal points in front of the
satellite buildings, particularly the building south of
Taco Bell.
3. Sidewalk connections must be provided from Hellman and
Helms Avenue to enhance pedestrian access from the
southerly tract homes.
Align the southwest drive approach with the apartment
project currently under construction on ~he west side of
Hellman.
Schedule review of the Time Extension for the next
Planning Commission meeting {July 10, 1985). Revised
plans must be submitted for Consent Calendar review prior
to Commission review.
7:00 - 7:30
GN REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMENI~
Nancy Fong June 6, 1985
DESIGN REVIEW FOR TT 11893 - PLAZA BUILDERS - Reapplication for design
review of new elevations for 35 single family lots on 17.2 acres of land
in the Very Low Residential District, 1-2 du/ac, located west of Sapphire St,
south side of Banyan Avenue. APN 1043-411-01
PLEASE CHECK "YES" IF IT IS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN
YES NO
,,,/
//
i
i
/--
SITE.PLAN: ...:..'...'_, .i
Building Orientation
Open Space
Parking Location
YES NO
ARCIIITECTURE:
Recognizable Theme
Scale, Mass, Height
Harmonious Style/Form
Materials/Color
Variation/Interest
Roof Screens
CIRCULATION:
.... ~~"':""Access Location
Street Pattern Variation
Pedestrian Access
Pedestrian Amenities .,,/'~ Emergency Access
Site Coverage ~ Vehicle Stacking
Storage/Loading Areas ~ Back-up & Turn Around
~ COHPATIRILITY
Neighborhood Character
/' Density Transition
/ Buffering/Screening
/'~ Grading
Land Use Conflict
Noise
Cor2~.[_ S__i~/R__e.~[..~pgrade / Traffic
LANDSCAPING: -'-~ ..... r ..... GRADING:
'/j' Natural Topography Maintained
Streetscape
Enhance Architecture
Tree Preservation
Screening/Buffering
Shade Parking Lot
S]ape P]an~ing
/ Grading Minimized
/ Contoured Slopes
/ Slope Heights/Gradient
/ ~ist~asPreserved
" / Views Into Site
Members Present:
Staff Planner:
.~ Recommended approval subject to the following conditions of approval:
~ Recommended that the project be revised for additional Committee review
as follows:
[] Did not recommend approval as follows:TM
1. Site Plan:
Provide a decorative block wall consisting of plaster
and slumpstone for lots 6 and 35, consistent with the
block wall on"north sid~ of Banyan Street.
Provide temporary cul-de-sac, or some kind of
barricade, at the end of Banyan Street to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
7:30 - 8:00
REVIEW COlitITTEE COl(tENniS-
Nancy Fong June 6, 1985
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12969 - YAZEDjIAN - A total
residential development of 24 single family homes and two duplex totaling
28 units on 4.78 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential District
4-8 du/ac located at the south side of Arrow Hwy,~ba~:-~rn. Come~ .S~eet
and Sierra Madre Drive. APN 207-222-08
PLEASE CHECK "YES" IF IT IS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN
YES NO
I
,,:'SimsPLAN:_ "
Building Orientation
Open Space
Parking Location
Pedestrian Amenities
Site Coverage
Storage/Loading Areas
ARCHITECTUNE:
Recognizable Theme
Scale, Mass, Height
Harmonious Style/Form
Materials/Color
Variation/Interest
Roof Screens
co r, ~.~j d__e / R__e.~L U_p_g..T.~9
LANDSCAPING: .........
Streetscape
Enhance Architecture
Tree Preservation
Screening/Buffering
Shade Parking Lot
_Slope Planting
YES NO
i ...........CIRCULATION:
Access Location
Street Pattern Variation
Pedestrian Access
Emergency Access
Vehicle Stacking
Back-up & Turn Around
HE1GIIBORHOOD ".)
COMPATIBILITY '(
Neighborhood Character
Density Transition
Buffering/Screening
Grading
,/ Land Use Conflict
/'/ Noise
...I ..........................
:GRADING:
Natural Topography Maintained
Grading Minimized
Contoured Slopes
Slope Heights/Gradient
· Vistas Prest~d
Views Into Site
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITFEE ACTION
Staff Planner: /~.~~
L='I Recommended approval subject to the following conditions of approval:
~'l Recommended that the project be revised for additional Committee review · as follows:
[] Did not recommend approval as follows:~
1. Site Plan:
The project should be designed to save as many trees
as practical. The trees that need to be removed
should be replace exclusive of the required
landscaping requirements.
b. Front yard landscaping should be provided for all
lots.
c. Provide more lot width variations.
2o Architecture:
The intent of the General Plan Amendment is to
upgrade this area by a higher quality housing
project. The roof should be of hip style.
I-~SIGN REVIEW COMMII'~EE COMMEN~
8:00 - 8:30 Howard Fields June 6, 1985
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-14 - GILBERT AJA -
For the Development of (2) one-story research and development buildings
consisting of 26,490 sq.ft. and 104,720 sq.ft. on 8.42 acres located on
the northwest corner of Sixth Street and Cleveland Avenue in the Industrial
Area Specific Plan (Subarea 11, light industria]~and~a.rei~lusi~gtistriSb'timl
facilities}
PLEASE CHECK "YES" IF IT IS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN
YES NO YES NO
, .... !- =' T .' '-t
! . SIIE PLAN: , ! ; CIRCULATION:
/ Building Orientation ........ /:' Access Location
"' Z Open Space / Street Pattern Variation
/~ Parking Location /' Pedestrian Access
Z Pedestrian Amenities / Emergency Access
/ Site Coverage / Vehicle Stacking
'/ Storage/Loading Areas / Back-up & Turn Around
I ) i ~' TIEIG!IBORHOOD
i t AI1CtiIIECTUI(E: i ,COMPATIBILITY
/ Recognizable Theme Z Neighborhood Character
/ Scale, Mass, Height /' Density Transition
./-/ Harmonious Style/Form / Buffering/Screening
/ Materials/Color / Grading
/-/ Variation/Interest / Land Use Conflict
Roof Screens // Noise
· Corner Side/Rear Upgrade /' Traffic
......................... ~ .........F .....................
! ! LANDSCAPING:._ ! GRADINg: .......
................ y .......~treetscape / Natural Topography Maintained
// Enhance Architecture / Grading Minimized
Z Tree Preservation / Contoured Slopes
/ Screening/Buffering x/ Slope Heights/Gradient
/ Shade Parking Lot / Vistas Preserved
/ Slope Planting '/ Views Into Site
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION
Recommended approval subject to the following conditions of approval:
Recommended that the project be revised for additional Committee review
as follows:.
Did not recommend approval as follows:"
The Committee recommended changes to the site plan addressing more
pedestrian orientation and connections (stamped walkways), drive
approaches, ~,d also incorporate more plaza area, seating/shade.
The Committee requested the architect to explore additional
architectural embellishment to enhance the blank elevations along
the west, north, and portions of the south elevations for Building A
and B. The Committee requested an employee eating area with both
indoor/outdoor facilities.
8:30 - 9:00
REVIEW COI(4II'[EE COP,~IENTe
Howard Pi'elds June 6, 1985
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-15 - STRICKLAND -
To allow construction of a 8,350 sq.ft. automotive servi'ce/tire store on
1.20 acres of land in The Industrial Area Specific Plan General Industrial
District (Sub-Area 4) located at the northwest corner of Archibald and
7th Street. APN 209-171-48.
PLEASE CHECK "YES" IF IT IS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN
YES NO YES NO
/
/
Open Space
Parking Location
Pedestrian Amenities
Site Coverage
Storage/Loading Areas
ARCHITECTURE:
Recognizable Theme
Scale, Mass, Height
Harmonious Style/Form
Materials/Color
Variation/Interest
Roof Screens
Corner Side/Rear Upgrade
Street Pattern Variation
Pedestrian Access
Emergency Access
Vehicle Stacking
Back-up & Turn Around
NEIGItBORHOOD
COMPATIBILITY
Neighborhood Character
Density Transition
Buffering/Screening
Grading
Land Use Conflict
Noise
Traffic
Grading Minimized
Contoured Slopes
Slope Heights/Gradient
Vistas Preserved
Views Into Site
Enhance Architecture
Tree Preservation
Screening/Buffering
Shade Parking Lot
, Slope Planting
/
/
Streetscape / Natural Topography Maintained
Staff Planner:
~'] Recommended approval subject to the following conditions of approval:
[~ Recommended that the project be revised for additional Committee review
, as follows:
]"l Did not recommend approval as follows:"
The Con~i~tee .recommended changes to the site pl~ including
sidewalk connections both to the north and west. The Commit-tee is
concerned with screening the views into the rear service yard by
view obstruction gates and higher wall height. The architecture
needs to be revised to reflect more elements of the existing center,
including more landscaping planters along the building elevations.