HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985/06/20 - Agenda PacketF
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAH~ONGA
MEMORANDUM
June 27, 1985
Design Review Committee
COMMII'TEE ACTION
Rick Gomez
Herman Rempel
Dennis Stout
1977
Suzanne Chitiea (Alternate)
Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 20, 1985
The following is a description of projects which require review and
rating by the Design Review Committee. Please review the attached
plans, visit the project sites, and write down your comments using the
blank space provided under each project on the attached sheets. After
the meeting, the consensus of the Committee's concerns will be typed up
as the formal action/recommendation of the Committee and distributed to
the Commission and Council.
As always, feel free to contact the appropriate project manager (noted
in parentheses), prior to the meeting date, if you have specific
questions related to the scheduled projects. Dinner will be provided
between 5:00 5:30 p.m., Consent Calendar items will be reviewed
between 5:30 p.m. - 6:00 p.m., with the first design review item being
heard at 6:00 p.m. Please notify our department if you will be unable
to attend the meeting, or if you will be late, so that the dinner can be
properly ordered and the necessary arrangements made.
6:00 - 7:00 (Curt/Bruce)
CUP 85-21 - MASI
7:00 - 7:30 (Bruce)
CUP 85-11 - KNITTER & ASSOC.
7:30 - 8:00 (Howard)
CUP 85-09 - SHEPHERD OF THE HILLS
8:00 - 8:30 (John)
DR 85-19 - WOLFF, LANG, CHRISTOPHER
8:30 - 9:00 (Dan)
DR 85-22 - EDWARDS CINEMA
NF/ns
Attachments
CC:
Planning Commission/City Council
Dan Coleman/Planning Division
Joe Stofa, Paul Rougeau, Barrye Hanson
Loyd Goolsby
r
CONSENT CALENDAR [TENS AGENDA
June 20, 1985
DR 85-08 - AJA
(Howard)
Committee Action:
Review of parking island and seating area.
Recommended approval of the parking lot
island.
CUP 85-15 - STRICKLAND
( Howard )
Committee Action:
Review of revised elevation.
Recommended approval of revised elevation.
DR 85-14 - AJA
(Howard)
Committee Action:
Review of outdoor eating area.
Recommended approval subject to following
conditions:
(a) Pedestrian connection from 6th Street.
(b) Additional architectural embellishments
to the west elevation.
PD 83-01 - CALMARK
(Curt)
Committee Action:
Review of color scheme.
Recommended the use of dark grey flat tile
versus asphalt shingles, or revert back to
original colors with wood shake roofing.
1112672 - WESTERN PROPERTIES
(Curt}
Committee Action:
Review of revised window treatment to
Building A.
Recommended approval of changes to the
window treatment to Building A.
TT12969 - YAZEDJIAN
(Nancy)
Committee Action:
Review of revised elevation.
Recommended approval subject to revising the
roof style to a full hip or gable end for
the duplex building.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS AGENDA
June 20, 1985
(Continued)
DR 85-10 - OLYMPUS
(Curt)
Committee Action:
Review of revised side elevations and
recreation/office buildings.
Applicant submitted architectural plans for
a similar building to illustrate how the end
elevations could be reated. The Committee
was impressed with the design quality of the
similar building presented and recommended
that it replace in total the original
architecture regarding the recreation/office
building. The Committee stated it must
reflect design elements of the new
architecture (i.e., roof material,
architectural detailing.}
REVIEW COMMITTEE
6:00 - 7:00 Curt/Bruce
COMMEN'Ie
June 20, 1985
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-21 - MASI - The
development of a 40,962 sq. ft. mini-storage facility with a caretaker's
residence on 2.95 acres, and a conceptual Master Plan on 27.13 total acres in
the Industrial Park category (Subarea 7), located at the southwest corner of
Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN 229-011, 10, 19, 21, 26, 27, 28.
PLEASE CHECK "YES" IF IT IS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN
YES
NO YES NO
i SITE PLAN: ~ i i
Building Orientation /
Open Space ~
Parking Location y
Pedestrian Amenities /
Site Coverage /
Storage/Loading Areas /
CIRCULATION: .........
Access Location
Street Pattern Variation
Pedestrian Access
Emergency Access
Vehicle Stacking
Back-up & Turn Around
Recognizable The'no
Scale, Mass, Height
Harmonious Style/Form
Materials/Color
Variation/Interest
Roof Screens
.............. Sor.er Side/Rear Upgrade
~ .........: .........!,,_,,,,,~NDSCAPIN~ .......
Streetscape
Enhance Architecture
Tree Preservation
Screening/Buffering
Shade Parking Lot
Slope Planting
Character
Density Transition
Buffering/Screening
Grading
Land Use Conflict
Noise
Traffic
GRADING:
Natural Topography Maintained
Grading Minimized
Contoured Slopes
Slope Heights/Gradient
Vistas Preserved
Views Into Site
' NE IGIIBORHOOD
ARC|IITECTURE: ...........................L ..................', ...........................COffiPATXBIt, ITY
'\
DESIGN REVIEW CO~ITTEE ACTION FOR CUP 85-21 - MASI
Date:
Members Present:
Staff Planner:
June 20, 1985
Herman Rempel, Dan Coleman
Curt Johnston, Bruce Cook
Recommended approval.
Recommended approval subject to the following conditions
of approval:
Recommended that the project be revised for additional
Committee Review as follows:
Did not recommend approval as follows:
Mini-Warehouse
1. Mini-warehouse use is a concern in terms of compatibility
with the office park setting of the Master Plan. The
issue must be addressed at the Planning Commission level.
2. The current design of the mini-warehouse is
unacceptable . Substantial revisions are necessary to
provide a design which will not detract from the Master
Plan. Simplification of the design may be explored.
3. Landscaping along the interior building elevations is
necessary to soften views into the project from adjacent
multi-story office development.
4. Landscaping should be provided along the south boundary.
Master Plan
1. Streetscape landscaping per I.S.P. standards (i.e., 45'
average on Foothill and Rochester) must be provided.
2. Pedestrian connections must be provided between buildings
with texturized pavement.
3. Circulation is a concern at the southeast corner of
Foothill and the westerly loop road. Through access or
an adequate turnaround area must be provided.
4. Technical requirements, such as parking, must be complied
with.
7:00 - 7:30
REVIEW COMMITTEE COI(qENI
Bruce June 20, 1985
CUP 85-09 (LA PETITE ACADEMY)
7,422 sq. ft. day care center
District {8-14 du/ac} located
APN 201-221-11.
- KNITTER & ASSOCIATES - The development of a
on a .91 acre parcel in the Medium Residential
on the northeast corner of Haven & Valencia -
PLEASE CHECK "YES" IF IT IS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN
YES NO
~ I SITE PLAN:
Building Orientation
Open Space
Parking Location
Pedestrian Amenities
YES NO
CIRCULATION:
Access Location
Street Pattern Variation
Pedestrian Access
Emergency Access
,/ Site Coverage " / Vehicle Stacking
: ........Z .... .........
: ' ' ' NEIGHBORHOOD
~ ARCHTTECTURE: .......................i.. CONPATIBZLITY ...............
~ ........~ .... Recognizable Theme /
/ Scale, Mass, Height /
/ Harmonious Style/Form /
/ Materials/Color /
~ Variation/Interest /
/ ROOf Screens /
~ Corner Side/Rear Upgrade .~_....~f_f..!.~ ..........
: LANDSCAPING:
/
/
Streetscape
Enhance Architecture
Tree Preservation
Screening/Buffering
Shade Parking Lot
Slope Planting
Neighborhood Character
DenSity Transition
Buffering/Screening
Grading
Land Use Conflict
Noise
!_ G__RADING: _. .~
Natural Topography Maintained
Grading Minimized
Contoured Slopes
Slope Heights/Gradient
Vistas Preserved
Views Into Site
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION FOR CUP 85-09 - KNITTER & ASSOC.
Date: June 20, 1985
Members Present: Herman Rempel, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner: Bruce Cook
Recommended approval.
Recommended approval subject to the following conditions
of approval:
Recommended that the project be revised for additional
Committee Review as follows:
Did not recommend approval as follows:
1. A sound wall to the specifications of the acoustical
study is required along Haven Avenue. The design of the
wall shall be consistent with architecture for the
project.
2. The children's play area shall be eliminated west of the
building adjacent to Haven Avenue. All play area shall
be within the open space area to the east of the
building.
3. A Minor Exception to reduce on-site parking by 10% might
be appropriate and should be applied for by the
applicant. A letter of explanation relative to the
justification for reducing the available on-site parking
shall accompany this request.
4. Perimeter wall/retaining wall treatment as proposed along
north property line is satisfactory provided area is
attractively landscaped with cascading shrubbery and
ground cover.
5. The design of the Haven Avenue parkway, including both
sidewalk and landscaping, should be coordinated with the
overall master design plan of the Terra Vista Planned
Community for Haven Avenue.
6. All drainage issues involving the design of Valencia
shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the Building
Official prior to the issuance of building permits.
7:30 - 8:00 1985
REVIEW COMMIllEE COI~IEN~
Howard June 20,
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-11 SHEPHERD OF THE
HILLS CHURCH - A 1,458 sq. ft. addition to the existing church on 2.1 acres of
land in the Low Residential District (2-4 du/ac) located at the northwest
corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Avenue - APN 201-821-050.
PLEASE CHECK "YES" IF IT IS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN
YES
/
/
/
/
NO
! SITE PLAN: ....................
'/--- Building Orientation
Open Space
Parking Location
Pedestrian Amenities
Site Coverage
Storage/Loading Areas
YES NO
CIRCULATION:
Access Location
Street Pattern Variation
Pedestrian Access
Emergency Access
Vehicle Stacking
/ Back-up & Turn Around
T' .............;'~ NEIGHBORHOOD
ARCIIITECTURE: ...................L ..........; ............L....COHPATIBILITY ..................
Recognizable Theme // Neighborhood Character
/ Density Transition
Buffering/Screening
'/ Grading
// Land Use Conflict
Noise
/ Traffic
L. GRADING:
Scale, Mass, Height
Harmonious Style/Form
Materials/Color
Variation/Interest
Roof Screens
Corner Side/Rear Upgrade
~....L__ANDSCAPING:
Streetscape
Enhance Architecture
Tree Preservation
Screening/Buffering
Shade Parking Lot
Slope Planting
Natural Topography Maintained
Grading Minimized
Contoured Slopes
Slope Heights/Gradient
Vistas Preserved
Views Into Site
Bate:
Members Present:
Staff Planner:
DESIGN REVIEW COIIqITTEE ACTION FOR CUP 85-11 - SHEPHERD OF THE HILLS
June 20, 1985
Herman Rempel, Dan Coleman
Howard Fields
V//t Recommended approval.
Recommended approval subject to the following
of approval:
Recommended that the project be revised for
Committee Review as follows:
Did not recommend approval as follows:
conditions
additional
8:00 - 8:30
REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMEN~
John June 20, 1985
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-19 WOLFF, LANG,
CHRISTOPHER - Development of an 11,000 sq. ft. two-story office building on
.69 acres in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 7) located on the east side
of Utica, north of Civic Center Drive - APN 208-062-09.
PLEASE CHECK "YES" IF IT IS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN
YES NO
YES
SITE PLAN: , ....... ;...
Building Orientation
Open Space
Parking Location
Pedestrian Amenities
Site Coverage
Storage/Loading Areas
ARCiIITECllJRE:
Recognizable Theme
Scale, Mass, Height
Harmonious Style/Form
Materials/Color
Variation/Interest
Roof Screens
, ' LANDSCAP I NG:
.. ......................: ......
NO
Access Location
Street Pattern Variation
Pedestrian Access
Emergency Access
Vehicle Stacking
Back-up & Turn Around
NEIGI|BORHOOD
.................... L .............................COMPATIBILITY .........
Neighborhood Character
Density Transition
Buffering/Screening
Grading
Land Use Conflict
Noise
Corner Side/Rear Upgrade) /"' Traffic
Streetscape
Enhance Architecture
Tree Preservation
Screening/Buffering
Shade Parking Lot
Slope Planting
'1
GRADING:
Natural Topography Maintained
Grading Minimized
Contoured Slopes
Slope Heights/Gradient
Vistas Preserved
Views Into Site
DESIGN REVIEW CO!e4ITTEE ACTION FOR DR 85-19 - WOLFE, LANG, CHRISTOPHER
Date: June 20, 1985
Members Present: Herman Rempel, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner:
John Meyer
Recommended approval.
Recommended approval subject to the following conditions
of approval:
Recommended that the project be revised for additional
Committee Review as follows:
Did not recommend approval as follows:
~ESIGN_ R_EVX_EW CO~ITTEE COMMENTSe
8:30 p.m. Dan June 20, 1985
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-22 - EDWARDS CINEMA Development of a 6-plex
movie theater of 25,188 square feet on 13 acres of land located at the
northwest corner of Foothill and Haven (Virginia Dare Center) in the
General Commercial (GC) District.
PLEASE CHECK "YES" IF IT IS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN
YES
/
/
NO
/
/
/
/
/
YES NO
/
/
/
SITE PLAN:,.__
Building Orientation
Open Space
Parking Location
Pedestrian Amenities
Site Coverage
Storage/Loading Areas
CIRCULATION:
Access Location
Street Pattern Variation
Pedestrian Access
Emergency Access
Vehicle Stacking
Back-up & Turn Around
I ( NEIGHBORHOOD
~ j COMPATIBILITY ..........
................... ~ ............................
ARCHITECTURE:
Recognizable Theme
Scale, Mass, Height
Harmonious Style/Form
Materials/Color
Variation/Interest
Roof Screens
Corner Side/Rear Upgrade
LANDSCAPING:
Streetscape
Enhance Architecture
Tree Preservation
Screening/Buffering
Shade Parking Lot
Slope Planting
Neighborhood Character
Density Transition
Buffering/Screening
Grading
Land Use Conflict
Noise
Traffic
GRADING: ,,
Natural Topography Maintained
Grading Minimized
Contoured Slopes
Slope Heights/Gradient
Vistas Preserved
Views Into Site
DESIGN REVIEW CO l~qIl'rEE ACTION FOR DR 85-22 - EDWARDS
Date: June 20, 1985
Members Present: Herman Rempel, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner: Dan Coleman
Recommended approval.
ecommended approval
of approval:
subject to the following
Recommended that the project be revised for
Committee Review as follows:
conditions
additional
Did not recommend approval as follows:
Eliminate the light bulb strip on south elevation which
is defined as a sign and would not be permitted in
addition to the other wall signs proposed. Applicant
should prepare alternative lighting solutions for
Planning Commission review.
Staff directed to analyze shared parking concept to
assure that substantial conflict will not exist between
uses (i.e., office and theater).