The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About92-195 - Resolutions RE~I/IIIONNO. 92-195 A RESOUJi~C~ OF ~}{E CITY ~ OF ~{E CITY OF RANC~O CUCAMC~GA, ~i~C~qIA, TO LEVY AND COrI.~CT ASSES~B~TS WI~MIN~LIGHTING~qI~a~CEDISIRICTNOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 F~ME FISCAL YEAR 1991/92 PURSUANTTO ~}[ELA~ANDLIGHTINGACTOF 1972 IN fX)EONW'~ SIREET LIG~TING~ DISIRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7AND8 M~EAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of May, 1992, adopt its Resolutic~ of Intention No. 92-150 to District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 which Resolution of Intention No. 92-150 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and ccrsidered evidence, oral and d~, cc~cernin~ the jurisdiction facts in this proceed/~ and cc~cernd~ the necessity for the contemplated ~-rk and the' benefits to ha derived therefrum and said City Council having nc~ ac~,~ved SECT/ON 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho O_~m~lga that the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within Street Lighting Ma~ District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year 1992/93, 'and said City Council hereby ciders that the wurk, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Interfcion No. 92-150, be dc~e and made; and SBETION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the is hereb finally app m d; and S~CTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 1992/93 and method of assessment in the Engineer's P~x~rt are hereby PASSED, ~, and ADOPlOD this 17th day of June, 1992. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout NOES: Wright ABS~q[: Nc~e ~: Williams Resolution No. 92-195 Page 2 I, DRRRA J. ADAMS, CITY ~.~RK of the City of ~ Cucammx3a, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution w~s duly passed, ap[Eoved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of June, 1992. Executed this 18th day of June, 1992, at Rancho California. Resolutic~ No. 92-195 Street Light Maintenance Districts Highlights Street LiShting District 1 - Arterisl Streets · Edison charges to the district for street lights and traffic signals has increased due to an increase in electrical rates and the transfer of district electrical costs which in prior years were paid for with State Gas Tax funds which are no longer available. · 813 assessments have been added to the district. · Tax delinquency rate for the district is 12.65%. · 91/92 Rate = $10.18 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $13.82 Street Lighting District 2 - Local Streets · Edison charges expected to increase by over $30,000 · 152 assessments have been added to the district. · Tax delinquency rate for the district is 1431%. · 91/92 Rate = $20.00 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $29.30 Street Lighting District 3 - Victoria Planned Community · No assessments have been added to the district. · Tax delinquency rate for the district is 15.19%. · 91/92 Rate = $20.00 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $29.74 Street Lighting District 4 - Terra Vista Planned Community · 358 assessments have been added to the district. · Tax delinquency rate for the district is 2.35%. · 91/92 Rate = $20.00 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $27.72 Street Lighting District 5 - Caryn Planned Community · No assessments have been added to the district. · Tax delinquency rate for the district is 11.940/o. · 91/92 Rate = $20.00 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $33.19 Resoluticr~No. 92-195 Street Lighting District 6 - Commercial/Industrial · 29 assessments have been added to the district. · Tax delinquency rate for the district is 16.21%. · 91/92 Rate = $20.00 - Proposed 92/93 Rate -- $31.21 Street Lighting District 7 - North Etiwanda · 234 assessments have been added to the district. · Tax delinquency rate for the district is 42.20%. · 91/92 Rate = $32.16 - Proposed 92/93 Rate: $3332 Street Lighting District 8 - South Etiwanda · 35 assessments have been added to the district. · Prior to FY 92/93 only one property was in the district · Tax delinquency rate for the district is · 91/92 Rate = $121.92 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $126.31 Resoluticn No. 92-195 Page5 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Approved: O'Neil, Resolution No. 92-195 Page7 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. I (Arterial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial street throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to this City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on arterial streets. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development projecrs approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a city capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #1 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals. State Gas Tax funds have been used in the past for Maintenance and Operations. These funds are no longer available Projected Maintenance and Operations costs are increasing by nearly $30,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, those funds will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows: Resoluton No. 92-195 Page8 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1992/93 Total Personnel $0.00 Maintm~ance and Operations $62,000.00 Contract Services Traffic Sipl Adjustment $5,470.00 General Liability $2,990.00 Electric Utilities ~ Operations and Capital Subtotal: $178,690.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $101,470.00 Delinquency Contingency ~ Total Revenue Required: $301,950.00 Less: FY 91/92 Carryover ( $20.0OI Assessment Revenue Required: $301,930.00 Analysis: The most significant impacts on the proposed FY 92/93 budget are the increase of Maintenance and Operations of nearly $30,000 due to the elimination of a prior years State Gas Tax subsidy, and the increase in electricity charges due to an Edison rate increase and an increase in the number of street lights and traffic signals. 813 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 92/93 Assessment Rate: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $13~31. That is up $3.63 from the FY 91/92 rate of $10.18. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district Unit No. of Unit Rate/ [~xt Use T..vpe Units Rate Faoor A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 3,291.07 $13.81 2 $27.62 $90,900.00 Single Family Parcel ~ $13.81 1 $13.81 $211.030.00 Total 18,572.07 $301,930.00 ~I't~t~I~T LIGHTING MAINT,.,~ANCE DISTRIC'I'I II ~ - Ill , , ~.^TE, ~ ,~ ,~ ~,: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~,.~ ~,~ ,~ SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DIVIYlON ' O~ RANGIO CUCAMONGA '~ ,~'. ~* ~ CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-195 >age SLD1 ANNEXAT ! ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 TR 14192-1 ;'6, AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 DR 89-21 5 AU ANNEXED NAY 1 1991 PN 74~11 1.77 AU ANNEXED NAY 15 1991 TR 13144 21 AU ANNEXED JUNE 19 1991 PM 1382~i 27.74 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 CUP 88-28 1.04 AU ANNEXED $EPTENIER 4, 1991 TR 148~I 47 ALl ANNEXED OCTOBER 16, 1991 1 2.38 AU CUP 91-1 ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TR 14139 120 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TR 14380 79 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TR 14379 35 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 TR 13351 118 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 TR 13717 197 AU ANNEXED DECEMBER 18o 1991 DR 88-09 1.0~ AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 18, 1991 COYOTE CANYON ELEM6.B8 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 6, 1991 PN 13113 2.0 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 TR 137O3 55 AU ANNEXED MARCH 20, 1991 DR 90-05 9.06 AU ANNEXED MARCH 6 1991 TR 1335'~-1 8 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 Cup 89-26 9.92 AU ANNEXED JANUARY 15, TR 13945 35 AU ANNEXED JANUARY DR 8~-13 .93 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 19, 1992 OR 89-12 4.& AU Resolution No. 92-195 Page 11 EXMI[IT .A. ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM L~ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 STREET L. IGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. t AND 2 :GNONETTR::X,ST,~ N.T._=. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TR ].4L92-3. ResoluticmNo. 92-195 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 ,5'/TE' FO0 THIU,. BL VD. T ... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DR ~ ~- 2 / Resolutic31 No. 92-195 Page 13 EXPtI[IT '&' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. i AND 6 . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA " COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 5782 HAVEN ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~.,,~, ~.~ :::_~::- Resolutic~ No. 92-195 Page 14 F, XP'IleiT ',.%' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I..ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET. LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (~ .; STATE OF CALIFORNIA "r~, t ~lz ~ Resolutic~l No. 92-195 EXHIBIT 'A' t ASSESSMEHT DIAGRAM /ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 4 · - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA " COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO q~. . { STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ ~' Resolution No. 92-195 Page 16 CiTY OF RANCHO CUC&MONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDfiC) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,,,,,-,- Resolutici~ No. 92-195 Page ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER I Resolution No. 92-195 EXHIBIT 'A- ,~SSBSSMBNT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND G ,~/~ rh~ _= r~ ~ 5TROT L/G/IT- NON~' e . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA " COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ ~TAT~ OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-195 Page ~9 Resoluti~l No. 92-195 Page 2o t Resolutic~l No. 92-195 Page 9 LO / !I It" It Resolution No. 92-195 Page 22 EXHIBIT 'A- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NC). 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 ~2li~C*~ ~!Q. 13 3 5 1 ~DSCUE ~IITDUCI DISTINCT 10. 4 ~ERRA ~S~A PARKWAY ( TRA~T NO, ~ 3 3 ~ ~ ) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TF / _~: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSKSSNKIIT DIAGIAN-I,,,~,~" L ~ITKIAICK DISTB|(.:! WEST GREENWAY TRAIL ( Pot. l, ct.. a, P.m. llZ~5 ) WANTITIES: i TOTAL LANI)SCAP{ AREA: '13 o 500 S, · HARDGCAPt AIIW, A: 9, 1 ~0 S.r. GROUND COVg:R ARF, A: · o 360 S. Ir. ( 4*e THICK SHIBDDF,,D NULf:H ) · 5 GAL. SHRUBS: 469 ./ ~, N, 10898 FCL, · ImOI. LIlt I, TI. I10o Illl tCL. I ~' iSSKSSNi- DIAGIAN LAIDSCAPK lilITKI&ICK DISTRICT I0. CHURCH STREET rton eL. AVK...S~ ~0 KL. AVUUK ) I MEDIAN LANDSCAPE AREA: t 5,070 S.F. I F, LH Ave:t, me: ,-, ! -I~'~,* lilt Resoluticr~ No. 92-195 Page 25 LAIDSCAtl lUXITIIAICI DXSTIXC! aO. & ~ , .~./' TR, NO , I 3 7 1~7 ILl AVIIUI Sitgel AVIIOl ClOlC! STILE IT.LZIT(IHOO IJIt.) 1 IT.I. ZIT(tIOO I. gll. ) · Ilk. 3 r.A. I?. L.TmtIIOO IJII.) 12 Ilk. ST. ~(IS 6&~.) 73 Elk. SO Elk. PAJULVAV/JUfI:F, UXNQ l?.3OO S~IP. t.400 I.r. 3. NO'rt: ALl,, QUANT'Z'T2tS SHOeIN &lit CXiI,.Y ~ 'rKt PAItKWAYS ADJAC!3t'T TD 'tRACT NO. 1371'7. Resolutic~No. 92-195 Page26 I ,')SESSMENT DIAGF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 · I . .-, CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN ~ItERNARDINO Resolutiom~ No. 92-195 Page 27 ASSESSNEST DIIGR/R LANDSCAPE ~AIMTE~ANCE DISTIICT 10. 4 COYOTE CANYON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE ---- ... /,o_el. og' "~,, / .' .' ',,,', 3 - :',',',',, .' ' ,'~',' ' "--- " $ "{ZZ///////Z//////2'?/////././Z.Z/-Z/7/////// I COYOTE CANYON i " ELEM. SHOOL' SITE .. / ~ i ~ . - / ~ t, tA ~ r/Pt~.v .' ~t~ Soo s.~. R~esolution No. 92-195 Page 28 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO I~M !_~/13 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resoluti~m No. 92-195 Page 29 EXHIBIT -A· ~4~5E55MENT DIAGRAM I..ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ! STREET I-IGHI!NG MAINTENAI~ICE DISTRIC;T NOS. 1 AND 2 lEGEND ~ CITY MAINTAINLrD AREAS .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TR. 1370~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resoluticx~No. 92-195 EXMIIIT 'A' -- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTFIICT NO S. I AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-195 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 CITY OF RANCliO CUCAMONQA COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7",~/3~"I- Resolutic~No. 92-195 Page 32 EXHIBIT 'A- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM .LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ~TR~T I I~HT~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSFSSMFNT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ~ 0m.$ mim-AmmD Aviom kl f. ,m m we me ~o ot 04 t · mm mS ml · I mm el mm 0 LEGEND mature eraeel .~~ DENOTES LANDSCAPE AREA DENOTES SIDEWALK I~1 DENOTES STREET LIGHT C) DENOTES TREES _CITY OF RAN,CHO CUCAMONGA ~ ~ .m ,ms 'COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO EXHIBIT STALE OF CALIFORNIA scmtt r,aoo 'A' Resoluti~mNo. 92-195 Page 34 EX.fIIT 'A' RilIS~:].I~ NC}. 92-03.4 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ 3 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N~. 3 STRUT lIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N08. 1 AND 6 I CITY OF RANGHe CUCAMIHiOA COUNTY OF SAN IIRNARDINO ITATI OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-195 Page 35 · EXHIBIT 'A' Reso],u'c.iQn No. 92.-043 'e'SSr';SS~'q::MT-DIAGRAM~ ~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 N/~/ F'/-/ CiTY OF RANCNO Ct,ICAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-195 Page 37 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 2 (Local Streets) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Approved: William J, City Engineer · Resolutic~ No. 92-195 Page 39 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local street throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. it has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or aS a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #2 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $110,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, those funds will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: Resolutic~ No. 92-195 Page Proposed Maintenance Bud2et for 1992/93 Total Personnel $10,460.00 Maintenance and Operations $5,000.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $9,870.00 General Liability $1,800.00 Electric Utilities $113,530.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $140,660.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $40,030.00 Delinquency Contingency $11.870.00 Total Revenue Required: $192,560.00 Less: FY 91/92 Carryover { $14.620.00~ Assessment Revenue Required: $177,940.00 Analysis: The most significant impact on the proposed FY 92/93 budget is the increase in electricity costs of over $30,000 to a projected annual cost of over $110,000. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. 152 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 92/93 Assessment Rate: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $2930. That is up $930 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ~ Use T..vpe Units Pale Faclnr A.U. Rsvenue Commercial Acre 318.52 $29.30 2 $58.60 $18,670.00 Single Family Parcel 5.436.00 $29.30 1 $29.30 ~ To ta ! 5,754.52 $177,940.00 STREET LIGHTING MAINTEi.ANCE DISTRICT 2 I I___,l- I I I I I I I idl I ~1 1 IASELIllE e1 RD dl iTHILL_BLV .w, / , ' / ~ i -__ ..,, Z;L ~.~ ~ .$ s n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA R.~. ~ ~.~ SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Of RANCliO CUCAMONGA ~-~u~m.~ CALIFORNIA Resolutic~ No. 92-195 Page 42 SLD2 ANNEXAT ! ONS ANNEXED NOVENBER 20, 1991 TR 16192-1 26 AU ANNEXED NAY 15 1~;~1 1 ~, 21 TR 31 AU ANNEXED $EPTEHBER &, 19~1 TR lz,866 z,7 AU ANNEXED $EPTEHBER/,, 19~1 CUP 88-28 1.0~ AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 6, 1W1 PN 13113 2.0 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 TR 13703 55 AU Resolution No. 92-195 Page 43 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 N.T .~. k"/'l!!l!!l,,'t CZt't nazw~axm Me.~ CITY OF RANCHO OUGAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resoluticn No. 92-195 Page 44 {XM|Si r 'A ' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET-LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 }' .. · CITY OF RANGHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO qS '~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA "rR I '~l ~ · Resolution No. 92-195 Page 45 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER I I ~ ~ ~4~ lama) -. _.. ~ m Cn ~) oc~ ~ T~- ~ CITY OF 14e~, RANCHO CUCAMO~A :~ *- COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDI ~ -*. ~ Resolution No. 92-195 Page 46 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ]- ~ 208-261-20 ~' me f~e el ,~ eli ,#e lit ~ I lluklvlmo · .... ~_,~ .... ~'~. ~?' - ..... .':~~." . .-, I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CUP 88-28 STATE OF CALIFORNIA · Resolutiotq No. 92-195 Page 47 6XHIIIT 'A' '~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO P~M I~/13 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resoluti~ No. 92-195 Page 4e EXHIBaT 'A' A~SESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 LEGEND 7 "'~C~TY MAINTAINLrD AREAS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA .. TR. 13703 Resolution No. 92-195 Page 49 Annual Engineers Report..' City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Approved: William City Engineer Resolution No. 92-19B City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights 'are installed by private development as a condition ofa development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitred under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #3 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $70,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, those funds will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as follows: Resolution No. 92-195 Page 52 Propoud Maintenance Bud_let for 1992/93 Total Personnel $0.00 Maintenance and Operations $0.(30 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $0.130 General Liability $1,170.00 Electric Utilities $70.660.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $71,830.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $27,800.00 Delinquency Contingency $8370.00 Total Revenue Required: $108,000.00 Add: Deficit Recovery S9.990.00 Assessment Revenue Required: $117,990.00 Analysisi The assessment rate for this district reflects an infiationary incr~as~ in costs. However, in past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. No new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 92/93 Assessment Rate: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $29.74. That is up $9.74 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ l.axi Us~ T..vpe Units Rae F~r A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 98.26 $29.74 2 $59.48 $5,840.00 Single Family Parcel 3.771.00 $29.74 I $29.74 ~ Total 3,869.26 $117t990.00 , ,,~mldT LIGH'i ,~,L, MAINTE:' '~NCE DISTRICT 3 . . --: ~"~ I I : 1 I I i ~ ' I I I I ' VILSQ AV.E~ I ' ;T ~ .; im ~.~.~.~ : FOOTHILL ...... CITY O[ RANCliO CYCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-195 Page 55 Annual Engineers Report:~i~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Approved: William J. City Engineer Resolutic~ No. 92-195 Page 57 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #4 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of ready $50,000. However, this amount is down by about $3,000 from FY 91/92. Other costs are down (Maintenance and Operations down $40,000) in order to keep costs in line with the assessment rate of $27.72. The reason for this will be discussed below in the Analysis section of the report. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, those funds will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD ~4 are as follows: Resoluti~mNo. 92-195 Pro_oosed Maintenance Bud_~et for 1992/93 Total Personnel $58,160.00 Maintenance and Operations $10,000.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $5,000.00 General Liability $810.00 Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: $121,240.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $17,360.00 Delinquency Contingency $1.190.00 Total Revenue Required: $139,790.00 Less: FY 91/92 Carryover f $31.200.00) Assessment Revenue Required: $108 ,590.00 Analysis: There are no substantial increases in the district's budget which exceed the inflation rate. However, in past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. $31,200 of the district*s fund balance will be used to reduce'the assessment revenue required thereby keeping the assessment rate lower at $27.72 per assessment unit. 358 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 92/93 Assessment Rate: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $27.72. That is up $7.72 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ~ Use Type Unils Rate Faclor A.U. Reven,-'-- Commercial Acre 892.59 $27.72 2 $55.44 $49,490.00 Single Family Parcel 2.132.130 $27.72 1 $27.72 $59.100.0Q To ta I 3,024.59 $108,590.00 :;i::i %t- J c,,u,, m ~., ms,: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA mama su,ns ,~amm SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ~ ~a~"°m~"~' CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-195 Page 6o $LD4 ANNf, X~T|ON$ · NIIIEX~ ,/tile 19 1991 ;ql 1~ 27.7/, AU AIIEX~) IIOVINIfi 20, TI 13351 118 AU liOVB!IEII 20, 1991 TI 1)717 ANNEXED IMIICN 6 1991 fit 1335t-1 8 AU Resoluticn No. 92-195 Page 61 EXHIBIT 'A' ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 ,-. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA " COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIHO (~ . ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA Rssolution No. 92-195 z>acJe 6~ EXHIBIT 'A- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 .vf:/A~ i,,4/vl:~Kr4~f' ARI,4 : 62.1.9 S.f. ISSISIIIT DZAGILII LAIDSCUI IkIlfflllCi O/STIzI:T 10. 4 TERRA V'rSTA PAREWAY ( TRACT HO, 13351 ) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMElT DIAGIAN-LAIDSC ., ]TEl&ICE DISTIICT 1O. 4 WEST GREENWAY TRA~[L I t, ot. t, CL. 2, S,.n. 112t5 ) ~A~ITI~: I . ~AL ~~PE AR~: 13, SOO S, F, ~~~ ~ ': 9,130 S.F. G~D ~ AI~: 4,380 S. iP. II. Ft3,, · ItOll, L01' 1o 11. NO, RIll FCL, l \ . ASSISSNIb. DIAGIAN LANDSCAPK NAIITKIAICI DISTBICT I0. CHURCH STREET FlOg ILR AVE. gIST TO ELM AVENUE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE Alr. A: 15,070 S.F. ~ 01', I -I.'1~.' I IH kllt, I TO I1. ll 2Jlr:.,~7!ri: r)i: ,:1 ;.t.t-fl.t-,J* {1,'; J; e~p , 12h-Jit,P-I ·Resoluticn No. 92-195 Page 65 - t# ..~.. ~ / I~ AV~Ol SIIOCI AVllOI CHIC! STII~' IT.I, ZmfI'(ISOOO LIII.) I IT.gmT(INO L,ilII. ) · full 3 F.,A. IT. xTXl!T(~ I, III.) 12 rr. a(1s GAL.) 73 rA. S0 r,k. ';e r..A. PeAT/,,ANDICAP"tI, IG 17.300 S.Ir. ~J,400 S.F. 3..570 S M: ALJ,, QUAN'ITf~e'R SH0e,el All: (Nel,,Y leOIt 1"'HI: PARJL'WA',/'~ AD.TAC~,,I"T 'l"0 TRACT NO. 13717. Resolution No. 92-195 Page 66 ASSESSNEFE DIAGRAN LAMDSCAPE NAIITE!AMCX DISTRIC! 10.4 COYOTE CANYON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE : COYOTE CANYON ELEM SHOOL 'SITE e Resolution No, 92-195 6XHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NC). 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. I AND 4 ~/~~' ...- ~:: ~ . ...~ ........ ., "'~~ I~ ~ -,. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ , ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA T'~/~L=~,~'/-/ Resolutic~ No. 92-195 Page 69 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Approved: William J. !, City Engineer Resolution No. 92-195 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Can/n Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of CaUfornia (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD #5 is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as'a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #5 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $27,000. While this amount is up compared to FY 91/92, the overall operating budget is down by over $2,000 in order to keep costs in line with the assessment rate of $33.19. The reason for this will be discussed below in the Analysis section of the report. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, those funds will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows: Resolutic~No. 92-195 Proposed Maintenance Bud?et for 1992/93 Total Personnel $0.00 Maintenance and Operations $~2,780.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $0.00 General Liability $520.130 Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: $40,630.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $~,~0.00 Tolal Revenue Required: $~2,1~0.00 Less: FY 91/92 Carryover ( Assessmet Revenue Required: ~00 Analysi;; Projected increases in electricity charges as mentioned above has the most significant impact on the increase in the assessment rate. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. $13,220 of the district's fund balance will be used to reduce the assessment revenue required thereby keeping the assessment rate lower at S33.19 per assessment unit. No new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 92/93 Assessment Rate: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $33.19. That is up $13.19 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ~ Use T..vpe Units Rate Fact~ A,U. Reve.,---- Single Family Parcel 1.173.00 $33.19 1 $33.19 !:38.930.00 Total 1,173.00 $38t930.00 I -, ,,,.,. ~ LIGHTINb ~vlnlNTE. YANCtd DISTRIC~ u II:mI:m:llIlIlIlll~ I __ _ _ ! HILLSlOE_ eL S~x_~: ' ~ d ,------- eel t.._1_,,, · _ '[' ,...ov _ _ __ :v..~ _ ~ " ' ,_!! CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-195 Page v5 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Approved: Wn]iam J , City Engineer Resoluticm No. 92-195 Pa~e 77 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (LandRape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities within this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the L~ndscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #6 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $10,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, those funds will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #6 are as follows: Rssolutic~Ro. 92-195 Proposed Maintenance Bud_Ret for 1992/93 Total Personnel $7,860.00 Maintenance and Operations $2~500.00 Contract ~ervices Traffic Signal Adjustment $6~580.00 General Liability $250.00 Electric Utilities $10,450.00 Capital Improvements: Street Light Installation 3.130.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $30,770.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $3,720.00 De[i~luency Contingency $1.950.00 Total Revenue Required: $,36,440.00 Less: FY 91/92 Carryover { $9.870.001 Assessmut Revenue Required Analysis: There are no significant increases in the budget beyond inflation. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. in future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the districfs assessment rate. $9,870 of the district's fund balance will be used to reduce the assessment revenue required thereby keeping the assessment rate lower at $31~1 per assessment unit. 29 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 92/93 Assessment Rat~; For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $31.21. That is up $11.21 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:. Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ~ Use T.? Unis l~te Faoor A.U. Reven~::- Single Family Acre 851.41 $31.21 1 $31.21 S26~70.0~ Total 851.41 $26,570.00 5'I'REET LIGHTING Ma~N'I'Ej'ANCE DISTIC~,,~ 6 I P I _ _ _. - .,,~:~, '. . -. ~ · ~ ~ ,,: CITY OF RAhCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ~ ~'~ SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ~ ~m%~A CALIFORNIA Resolutic~ No. 92-195 SLD6 ANNEXAT I CNIS ANNEXED NAY 5 1991 PJ4 7&~1 1.17 AU ANNEXED OECEI48ER 18, 1991 DR 88-09 1.06 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 CUP 89-26 9.92 AU ANNEXED JANUARY 15, 1992 DR 89'13 .9:5 AU ANNEXED FEBRIJARY 19, 1992 DR 89'12 ,r,..~. AU Resoluticm No. 92-195 Page 81 EXitlilT 'A' ' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NQS. I AND 5 · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-195 Page 82 EXHImlT 'A' RSSESSMEN~ DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 5 ~ANCH g~O NO. dF ~rg,'_cr TAF-z°-T -~ &~,4. ~'UCALI'P,?dS N/Ct/dZN STREET LIGHT - NONE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO C[~/P ~/-/I ' STATe; OF CALIFORNIA k,.,--' · Resolutior~ No. 92-195 Page AN ~ SESSMENT DIAGR M L DSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 ~ ~ ~vtNu~ ~ ~ ~ * .\ / / . .: -, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN mERNARDINC Resolu-ticxlNo. 92-195 Pages4 EX~dT 'A' - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. I AND 6 · CITY OF 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA · Resolution No. 92-195 Page 85 I eXHII7 'A' ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ND. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NDS. I AND 6 : p Ibm mdf'dWee'ad l ..- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolutic~ No. 92-195 Page s6 " A~SES~MENT OIAGRAM L.ANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIBTRICI' N0.3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANC! DIS'rFIICT NOe. ~ AND 6 QOUNTY 0¥ 9AN BIRNARDIN0 Resolution No. 92-195 Page 87 EXHIBIT 'A' . ASS~-SSk~MMT -DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 N/N F'/-/ S 7' . ~ STRE~ UGHTS / ~ . .. STATE OF CALIFORNIA D~ ~-/~ Resolutio~ No. 92-195 ~age 89 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Approved: William J. City Engineer Resolution No. 92-195 Page 91 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights 'are installed by private development as a condition ol~ a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #7 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $11,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, those funds will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD r/are as follows: Resolution No. 92-195 Page 92 Proposed Maintenance Bud_eet for 1992/93 Total Personnel $0.00 Maintenance and Operations $200.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $0.00 General Liability $200.00 Electric Utilities S11.770.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $12,170,00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $6,450.00 DeHinquency Contingency $1.4]0.00 Assessment Revenue Required $20,030.00 Analysis: The increase in eleclzicity costs is due to a projected increase in Edison charges along with an increase in the number of street lights being taken over for maintenance. No fund balance carryover is available to reduce the assessment rate from $305.43. A high delinquency rate of 42.20% has a significant impact on the cash flow required to maintain the district. 234 new assessment units have been annexed into the district FY 92/93 Assessment Rate: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $33,32. That is up $1.16 from the FY 91/92 rate of $32.16. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ l. axi Uss T..vpe Unils Rat~ Facax A.U. Raven,:-- Single Family Parcel 601.00 $33.32 I $33.32 $20.030.130 Total 601.00 $20,030.00 LIGHTING MhiNTEF':~.NCE D~STRICT '~ | ___I.,,,,,-_L FOOTHILL ~ ~ ~ '~ ~: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ~ ~m~ SAN B~RNARDINO COUNTY c~ m~ ~m.~ CALIFORNIA Resolutic~ No. 92-195 Page SLD ? AHNEXATZONS ANNEXED NOVLq48Ell 6, 1991 TIt 1/,139 120 AU ANNEXED NOVENIEIt 6, 1991 Tit 1&3~) 79 AU ANNEXED NOVEHIER 6, 1991 TR 1&379 35 AU ld 40 LANDSCAPEAREAS TO BE MAINTAIMIED BY e6 LANDSCAI~ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT. 117 77 III 24 Ill UTf "T" ~ 23 Ill CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONGA TRACT NO. 14139 Resoluticn No. 92-195 Page 96 M~mV~ Resolution No. 92-195 Page 97 9 # · ~0 9 9 o ,e 9 ~o Resolution No. 92-195 Page 99 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Approved: William J. ., City Engineer Resolutic~ No. 92-195 Page ~o~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #8 is for electricity charges for the power m the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $4,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added m arrive at the Revenue Required to maintaLn the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, those funds will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD ~8 are as follows: Resolution No. 92-195 Pa~s 102 Proposed Maintenance Bud_a~t for 1992/9~1 Total Personnel $0.00 Maintenance and Operations $130.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $0.00 General Liability $50.00 Electric Utilities S3.860.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $4,040.00 Assessfront Administration and General Overhead ~ Assessrnfftt Revenue Required $4e~0.00 Analysis: In FY 91/92 there was only one parcel paying into SLD #8. It has been determined that, with the inclusion of 35 additional parcels into the district and the accompanying street lights, the unit cost will still be approximately the same resulting in an assessment rate of over $125. 35 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. 1~ 92/93 Assessment Rate: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $126.31. That is up $4.39 from the FY 91/92 rate of $121.92 due to the above stated reasons. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ~ Use Tvoe Units Ra~ Facinr A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 36.00 $126.31 1 $126.31 $4.560.00 Total 36.00 $4,560.00 ~i~EET LIGHTING MAINTE~' .\NCE DISTRICT 8 I I I ~ I I I HILLlID[_ k RO B I ! MILSONZA_VEJ I BeYAll .. _ ~ '. . -------~.--- :- I i,T..H ST us , , :q : !i: e: !: ~ cnv LeTS F OTHIL BLVD ....:- %. . . . 1/ __ ~,,~~.k,j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA Rs~oluti~No. 92-195 Pag~ ~o4 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ~ LEGEND mmm.~ e leel J ~NOTES LANDS~PE AREA DENOTES SIDEWALK 9 DENOTES STREET LIGHT ~ ~NOIES TREES ~!TY OF RANCH0. CUCAMO~ r ~ ~ u~s COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO EXHIBIT STALE OF CALIFORNIA sc~. r,~oo 'A'