The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2011/10/26 - Agenda Packet THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION L� J! AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA OCTOBER 26, 2011 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL To ORDER Roll Call Chairman Munoz_ Vice Chairman Howdyshell Fletcher_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca • I II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 12, 2011 Regular Meeting Minutes III. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2011-00852-PETER A.WRIGHT -A request to establish an Entertainment Permit to allow for karaoke within an existing Bar (Type 48 ABC License), located at 8108 San Bernardino Road. APN: 0207-111-11-0000. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) because the project entails the minor operational changes to an existing bar, and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. • 1 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA • bis„J OCTOBER 26, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA IV. NEW BUSINESS B. DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00070-MERITAGE HOMES- The architectural design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the build out of 81 single-family lots on approximately 43.3 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre)of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the northerly end of Wardman-Bullock Road -APN: 1087-201-01 thru 07, 1087-201-13 thru 40, 1087-191-01 thrul5, 0226-792-15, 0226-792-20 thru 24, 0226-792-29 thru 38, 0226-782-01 thru 11, and 0226-782-12 thru 15. Related File: Tract 16324. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 (State Clearinghouse No. 2003111057), and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. • V. PUBLIC COMMENTS , This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. W. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS VII. ADJOURNMENT I The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 20, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. %K(65 • 2 of 4 n t; ' PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA L � OCTOBER 26, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, aplease contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To.allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. • The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any • appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a 3 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA L•Ti OCTOBER 26, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA fee of$2,216 for maps and $2,328 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us • . • • • 4of4 Vicinity Map 0 Planning Commission Meeting October 26 , 2011 A B .j L I ,i N a, E a o c � i. y d I av � I L • G 1 I IrdAIPPIAT 19th St PI I S 1 mg: Base Line f�1 'TB ase Line • Church low i Church Foothill 1 n�art Foothill > E :: co i Arrow - c Arrow Jersey r I 3 y- 8th I w4 o N Ill . W ! 2 76 to 0 6th a a c �: 6th N d Y 4th t < = _ 1 4th A 0. • * Meeting Location: City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting October 12, 2011 Chairman Munoz called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:15 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500'Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Frances Howdyshell, Lou Munoz, Francisco Oaxaca, Ray'Wimberly ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Mike Smith, Associate Planner; James Troyer, Planning Director; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner ANNOUNCEMENTS • • None . , . . « APPROVAL OF MINUTES • Steven Flower,Assistant City Attorney noted a correction to the minutes in that he was not present at the meeting of September 28, 2011. Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Wimberly, carried 5-0, to approve the minutes of. September 28, 2011 with the correction noted. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Munoz excused himself from hearing Items A, B, and C stating he works for a communications provider and to avoid any perception of a conflict of interest, he would recuse himself. He left the Council Chambers at 7:17 p.m. Vice Chairman Howdyshell then read the public hearing item description as follows: A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00690 - T-MOBILE WEST CORPORATION - A request to replace an existing single carrier monopalm wireless communication facility with a two-carrier 60-foot high monoeucalyptus wireless communication facility located within an existing shopping center within the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard • District (Subarea 2), located at 9116 East Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0208-632-49. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 3 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) exemption which covers the installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. • ' Commissioner Oaxaca asked if only one carrier is part of this facility. Mr. van der Zwaag said there are two: T-Mobile and Sprint. • Vice Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Curt Collier, Ikuma Inc., 920 Raymond Avenue, Long Beach, California, said he is representing T Mobile. He said this project is a plus because they were able to collocate rather than construct a new facility and the stealth design also matches the eucalyptus trees found in the area. Commissioner Fletcher said the elevation shows 3 arms. He asked if there is a 4th: Mr. Collier said the design is not finalized but will probably be 3 and it may be able to accommodate other carriers in the future. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said this is the first time she has seen a monoeucalyptus. She asked if they have been used elsewhere in the City. Mr. Collier said they are popular now because cities are overrun with monopines and monopalms; this is the next generation. He said this design also has more foliage and therefore they are more stealth. Vice Chairman Howdyshell closed the public hearing. • Commissioner Fletcher said he has not seen these. He said he hopes this will be a good replication of a tree as some really stand out(because they are not a good replication). Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she looks forward to seeing this completed as she has never seen one of these. Mr. Collier placed a picture of one on the overhead. Commissioner Wimberly noted there is more foliage to hide the antennas. Mr. Collier said these are more expensive, it has been used for several years, the carriers have resisted this design because of the costs. Motion: Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Oaxaca, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00690. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: MUNOZ - carried « B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00916 - AT&T MOBILITY - A request to replace 12 antennas and add two surge suppressors and a GPS antenna on an existing 62-foot high • wireless communication facility located on the west side of Hyssop Avenue and south of 6th Planning Commission Minutes -2- October 12, 2011 Street in the General Industrial Development District(Subarea 14)at 9320 Hyssop Drive-APN: 0229-321-02. Staff has determined that this project is categorically exempt from the • requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption - Existing Facilities). Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He noted that Staff added a condition of approval to repaint the pole to match the existing building. Commissioner Oaxaca asked if the height will be changed. Mr. van der Zwaag said this proposal does not increase the height. Edwin Kim of STC Wireless, representing AT & T Mobility confirmed that this proposal does not increase the overall height. He said there will be no visible changes to the equipment inside the facility. He said this facility is surrounded by general industrial uses. Vice Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no comment she closed the public hearing. Commissioner Wimberly noted that it is good that they can use the existing facility without reconstruction. Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Wimberly, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00916. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE • ABSENT: NONE • ABSTAIN: MUNOZ - carried C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00886 - AT&T MOBILITY -A request to replace 12 antennas on an existing 61-foot high (top of antennas at 65 feet) co-located wireless communication facility located on the northwest comer of Onyx Avenue and Feron Boulevard in the General Industrial Development District (Subarea 3) at 8800 Onyx Avenue - APN: 0209- 032-02. Staff has determined that this project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption - Existing Facilities). Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He said this proposal will be higher. He added thatthe tenant does not feel they should bear the expense of installing a stealth facility. Vice Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Edwin Kim, representing AT&T Mobility said this is the same type of upgrade. He said they need to maintain a 10 foot separation between carriers and that is why they are raising the height to allow for that separation. Vice Chairman Howdyshell asked how many more of these facilities are anticipated in the City. Mr. Kim said there are several factors as AT&T is trying to upgrade nationally and there is a pending • merger that may also generate more sites. Planning Commission Minutes -3- October 12, 2011 Vice Chairman Howdyshell closed the public hearing. Commissioner Fletcher said it is a simple request to upgrade and the changes will most likely not be • visible. He expressed support of the proposal. Motion: Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00886. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: MUNOZ - carried Chairman Munoz returned to the Council Chambers at 7:39 p.m. h M h t ! D. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00456-RESOURCE SOLUTIONS INC. FOR LAZY DOG CAFE - A proposal to construct a restaurant with an overall floor area of 9,396 square feet including an outdoor dining area of 978 square feet on an undeveloped parcel within a commercial center of approximately 504,000 square feet in the Industrial Park (IP) District (Subarea 12), located between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue on the north side of 4th Street - APN: 0229-411-04. Related file: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00457, Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00713, Uniform Sign Program Amendment DRC2011-00768, and Development Review DRC2004-01013. On September 28, 2005, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Development Review DRC2004- • 01013. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. E. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00457 - RESOURCE SOLUTIONS INC. FOR LAZY DOG CAFE -A request to provide alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption at a proposed restaurant with an overall floor area of 9,396 square feet including an outdoor dining area of 978 square feet within a commercial center of approximately 504,000 square feet in the Industrial Park(IP)District(Subarea 12), located between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue on the north side of 4th Street - APN: 0229-411-04. Related file: Development Review DRC2011-00456,Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00713, Uniform Sign Program Amendment DRC2011-00768, and Development Review DRC2004-01013. On September 28, 2005, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Development Review DRC2004-01013. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. F. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2011-00713-RESOURCE SOLUTIONS INC.FOR LAZY DOG CAFE -A request to remove two trees in conjunction with a proposal to construct a restaurant with an overall floor area of 9,396 square feet including an outdoor dining area of 978 square feet on an undeveloped parcel within a commercial center of approximately 504,000 square feet in the Industrial Park(IP) District(Subarea 12), located between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue on the north side of 4th Street - APN: 0229-411-04. Related file: Development Review DRC2011-00456, Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00457,and Development Review DRC2004-01013. • Mike Smith, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Planning Commission Minutes -4- October 12, 2011 Commissioner Fletcher asked if the outdoor dining includes screening. • Mr. Smith said there will be a low fence and no glass. He said a noise study was performed and the noise levels were not significant enough to require the construction of a sound mitigating wall. Chairman Munoz opened the public hearing. Moni Dosanjh of Lazy Dog Café, 27611 La Paz Road, Laguna Niguel thanked staff and Mike Smith for his assistance. He said this is their 10th location and it is the first true ground up building. He said this design will be their prototype. He said they look forward to being part of the community. Commissioner Fletcher asked where the closest Lazy Dog Café is located. Mr. Dosanjh said in West Covina, attached to the mall. He said they have a varied menu that is extensive and the decor is a lodge type atmosphere. Commissioner Oaxaca asked if there are any design features in this one that they did for the first time and is the outdoor space typical. Mr. Dosanjh said they kept to their concept materials including stone and wood. He said the kitchen is laid out more efficiently. He said an outdoor dining area is standard. Commissioner Wimberly noted that at Design Review they talked about using copper but the DRC allowed them to change that element to stucco. • Mr. Dosanjh noted that after seeing the copper installed at another location,they could see that it is not holding up as it is a less controllable material. • Carol Plowman, 8022 Carabe Court said she came to represent the owners of the Signature Center where the proposed restaurant will be located. She said she came to thank staff for the quick amount of time in getting this done. She said the owners and Lazy Dog are very impressed. She praised staff because this ground up construction application was entitled faster (6 months) than when Lazy Dog files applications in existing buildings in other communities. Commissioner Oaxaca asked what the timeline is for opening the restaurant. Mr. Dosanjh said they build in about 135-140 days from the receipt of permits. He said following several weeks to train chefs and the staff they hope to open in late March or April. Chairman Munoz closed the public hearing. Commissioner Fletcher said the design looks good and he wished them success. • Commissioner Wimberly said the project should enhance that location and he looks forward to its completion. Commissioner Oaxaca said he drove by one in West Covina and it looks really nice. He said it is great design and he agreed with the decision to drop the copper element. . Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she really likes the architecture,and she reviewed the great looking menu. She said this project creates jobs and another great destination for this City. She expressed many thanks to staff for their great work. • Planning Commission Minutes -5- October 12, 2011 Chairman Munoz said he worked with the applicants at DRC. He said he is really pleased when we get a project that is well done before it comes to the DRC. He said it has a Craftsman bungalow look and should look great in our City. He wished them the best of luck. • Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell, to adopt the Resolutions of Approval for Development Review DRC2011-00456, Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00457 and Tree Removal Permit DRC201 1-0071 3. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA; WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried James Troyer, Planning Director offered his thanks to Associate Planner, Mike Smith. He said everything Mike works on for the City receives compliments, he does a great job, and this too is a `signature' project for Mike Smith. DIRECTORS REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE STATUS REPORT AND REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES James Troyer, Planning Director presented the staff report. Commissioner Fletcher asked if the approval items would still have public notice requirements. Mr.Troyer affirmed that legal noticing would still occur per the Municipal Code regulation which is 15 days. Commissioner Fletcher commended staff. He said the update is a big improvement and more • customer-friendly. He said he likes it that smaller projects can be handled by staff that will save businesses time and money. Commissioner Wimberly concurred with Commissioner Fletcher and he offered kudos to staff for the hard work. He said this should be a significant improvement to the process. Commissioner Oaxaca agreed with both and said it sounds like a significant amount of work for staff and the consultant. He asked how many years has it been since this process was last done. Mr. Troyer said in 1983 the Development Code was written for developing lots of vacant land. He said that is not us anymore; we have more infill development now with only about 10% remaining vacant land. Commissioner Oaxaca asked if there is any provision to look at the Code more often. Mr. Troyer said staff will review this with every General Plan Update and also review it when any amendments are processed to maintain consistency. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said this looks like a wonderful thing and is a great model for other cities. She noted the great compliment received from Ms. Plowman and noted that it can be related to the Development Code. She said staff is doing a great job on this. Chairman Munoz agreed, staff and the consultants have done a great job. He said this is complex material and graphics like those shown in the presentation make it easier for the lay people. He said • Planning Commission Minutes -6- October 12, 2011 1' he likes the inclusion of items such as historic, sustainable development and infill development. He asked if the parking regulations will be reviewed. • Mr. Troyer said parking is part of it and we are looking at all those standards and will bring future updates. He said the tentative adoption date is in April 2012. Chairman Munoz expressed appreciation for the work staff has put in and noted that this was a tremendous amount of work that was accomplished with less staff. Commissioner Fletcher said with respect to parking if staff is looking at all the standards in all areas. He said it would be good to have clear standards that are more appropriate for commercial areas. Mr. Troyer said staff is reviewing all the parking standards and said that some need to be tweaked. The Secretary received and filed the report. * * * * * PUBLIC COMMENTS Sandy Dietl 7576 El Arco asked staff to look at the handicapped parking at the Senior Center and the Community Center. She said the cement bumpers at the front of parking spaces(wheel stops) should be changed to higher, more visible posts for the benefit of seniors. She noted that a friend fell and was seriously injured on one. She also invited everyone to attend the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber event on October 21st at the Double Tree Hotel. * * * * * • COMMISSION BUSINESS AND COMMENTS Chairman Munoz asked staff to provide a report regarding the parking at the Senior Center and to review possible alternatives. He thanked staff for dedicating the book to the memory of his grandson Landon who recently passed away. He said his son and family were deeply touched by this special gift. • ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell, carried 5-0, to adjourn. The Planning Commission adjourned at 8:20 p.m. • Respectfully submitted, James R. Troyer, AICP Secretary Approved: • Planning Commission Minutes -7- October 12, 2011 , STAFF REPORT 1,47A+Tier14 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT LJ DATE: October 26, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2011-00852 - PETER A. WRIGHT - A request to establish an Entertainment Permit to allow for karaoke within an existing Bar (Type 48 ABC License), located at 8108 San Bernardino Road - APN: 0207-111-11-0000. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA • Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) because the project entails the minor operational changes to an existing bar, and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: Existing building is 2,908 square feet on a 10,000 square foot lot for an FAR of .29. • B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Residential - Mixed Use (MU) South - Office - Office (0) East - Residential - Mixed Use (MU) West - City of Upland - Apartments C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Mixed Use North - Mixed Use South - Office East - Mixed Use West - City of Upland - Apartments D. Site Characteristics: The subject site is fully developed with a Bar and a residence which pre- dates City Incorporation. The property is nonconforming to present day Development Code • Standards. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided • Bar 2032 1/100 20 13 Residence 876 1.5/DU 1.5 0 • Item A • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2011-00852— PETER A. WRIGHT October 26, 2011 Page 2 • ANALYSIS: A. General: The Applicant's statement indicates that they have been operating with karaoke in the past. The request is to restart this activity Wednesdays and Sundays from 8:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. midnight. Staff reviewed the complaint history and police incidents and could not find any evidence of significant ongoing problems. B. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) because the project entails the minor operational changes to an existing bar, and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of Entertainment Permit DRC2011-00852 to allow for karaoke within an existing bar, through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, • Jam d R. Troyer, AICP Y Planning Director JRT:LH/dh Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Location Map Exhibit B - Site Utilization Map Exhibit C - Applicant provided Site Plan Exhibit D - Applicant provided Floor Plan Exhibit E - Applicant support memos Exhibit F - Photos of the Business Draft Resolution of Approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2011-00852 • A-2 .. 1 • 1 --------------(........, 1 1 0 0 U 1 F1. 2 1 0 I I J z W z c m a 7 o 0I tu O SAN BERNARDINO cc I 0 I 1 I co • I o I U F- I U I -J I W cc 1 I I I f SITE LOCATION MAP N SEXI-IBIT A A 140 70 0 140 Feet • -3 4.r • fir • • f� Y -� •r, + •,i,. ]lam ' '1 1.x:1' s.. ? •f el . • t ....-... • . .0: ! s • r ... _ ..-.. [ _ 'u , a. N. f •6 Y • 61141 . •.,• . fc , 4 a. iii .::• 1 lij ..41111......a. di 4 P 'r . " ) ....1 "-... p? 'L_ ;1„�""- ► °'11111 SAN BERNARDINO... -,.,: • oar ..,'" 1-.• .""":011 ...." ••••-•"'"`•41C i f 7-2. _, • gar: ....,07.1 ,..../. ,.,.....`3,7,„.4*--- ,00-4::i : ,'. 1 : '''' ref �1 r . 0 ?Pa' yr t ` I4. ' • EY .-11'7+.—' ,, IL- , .. .,-- , : r''' - : lik - ,,,or .alts\ \A . . i I I 1'Aa- • N SITE UTILIZATION MAP iFJCF1IBIT B 110 55 0 110 Feet A-4 • Szr�.. ?Lv!FtJ .• • • . . - t- • u1.,0' • (s _ : V : / vN, — Gtck Eri-[in.di-wcc_ 0 : - � • Pvw`R)54.: usT.0 ►_c+ stt�C ci.v . __.. . loo. . . . . .... _ . .. . . ... . . . ... . _ . _ . .. ! • ,nitti,i_�-� „ti ttjte , • N ltibil .P.3 Q.r1 =i4;;r:f ?��sziop' a AUG 1 5.2011.._ — • EXHIBIT C [ RECEiV ;aA � NNja-• • SiA-- 13-&-v1.../.1100,4-0 t _IJO VI.0ik A-5 k a4 ' • )1 c . V Loovt- ri..1.41.) • .1. Ai .• . . - . • , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ • , . • . . , . • 4,-- . ofc.e•NYA- 5- • • • . • . • . . . . • . • • . , . . . 0 . • • . . . . . . . . . . - . • . . . • • . ____ '-- ,--:-.----,— a5;i-ttocciitt., • . . _ • ..0___ , _. ,..__...._:_i - • .A • : AtOrKiL±Weict.- • -- :- . • .. . hi 11 .. ai-- • • • - • ----------1------- -------- . r-4-164.A_ . • . . . T111 . . • . . . . - • • . . . . : . . . • : . . . . . --. . . . . . . • - . . • • : . " • • , . • . . , . • . , . . „ . ' ' • : • ..•0 • ! • . . . .._, . : r0:-. •-•^ • ' .T:TIliIwIQ J1± li ii • . . , -fe-c-CN) --- . . . . ) .. . • . a ---e. a . ;14?-: • . • • . . . • . . ... . ft . . . . . : . , , ' . :Tit. __t nr 1 . . , . • • ..r.7 1 • • i . • • , . • ...j . - - . . . . . . . --.---------- --'..- - - - -.--.---- ______. 24..7*... __.." ._._.._,_. :.• . . • - , .., . . • . . , • . • • . — H . . . . , 42- ---.--> • : • • • • • • • ! • . . , • . . • • •. . , , . 0 ., . :,_ : . • . . • . . . . . . • . • , • • . . . . • . . . . • . , . . • . • ., • : --e. t, -H -----.:•=c--->- . . • , , . . • . . . . . . : , -, . . . . • . • . . , . ,-,..-4-4- 6-IP-lit-cc.,5 . • . ! • -- -••- - - ••- : • r -17!"_- : . t ! ' ! - •0_- • • - . . • 0 • . . . . .—., ••• . . • tip . , . ! . : • , . • : ! . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , • . . . . • . : . . . . • . . . , . . . . , . ! . , . . . • . • : : . - . . . . . • ! . 111 • . . . . . • - ....--. -_...-.-•-.' . . • --9.2---"----- airaAA-sA1 DJ vitelkir . • . • . • o Axels; • I) • . it • • . o • • . . . _.,____________ __ ____L -_ • - . ' - . . • - : . _. EXHIBIT D . . . ! . . . . • • . . c „ , . . -. •. 4----r-:- ,. . . : . . . _.. .._:.... . . I.< 30 __1=6 >1 . • . GM!OF R;^bOHO C-. t'AM r A • TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department AUG 1 5 201 FROM: Rampaw Rentals, LLC/President Peter A. Wright A� ,�i � 'v ;� RE€a . tn. n _ .'�:i � RE: Entertainment Permit/Section 1: Filing Requirements#2 DATE: August 15, 2011 This permit is for my bar, "Deane's Bar&Thrill" located at the corner of San Bernardino Road and Grove on the extreme west end of town. This local bar has been in business since 1958 and I have owned it since April of 2005. I believe it is the oldest bar, without a restaurant, in the city. It's always had the name"Deane's" in its title, but I honestly have no idea who Deane is! I previously had some entertainment up until about January of 2010 until I was informed by city personnel that I needed this permit to continue. Since then I have only used a Jukebox and televisions for entertainment. I am currently open daily from Noon till 2 am. There are two work shifts with one bartender per shift. On Friday and sometimes Saturday evenings, there might be an additional bartender or bar-back. I am present almost daily from about 1 pm till 11 pm. The occupancy is 69. There are two pool tables, one dart board,vending machines,video games, several N's, ATM etc. within about 1200 Square Feet. • I have an ABC#48 liquor license which allows for Distilled Spirits, Beer and Wine. I do not have to serve food but I choose to and have a "bar food" menu, see attached. There are no special conditions on the license and it is in good standing. You must be 21 or over to enter. I would like an Entertainment Permit to bring back very popular Karaoke nights which were scheduled every Wednesday and Sunday from 8 pm till 12 am, but sometimes lasted longer. There was no cover fee to enter bar or participate in Karaoke by anyone. However I did charge .25 cents extra for each beverage or food item purchased, by anyone,to help off-set the cost of the Karaoke Host. The Karaoke Company that I hired had a contest in 2009 and Deane's won, "Venue of the Year" Inland Empire, see attached. I am planning on hiring this company back when I get a permit to do so. • Peter A.Wright 909-534-3385 • EXHIBIT E A-7 D e ane ' s Bar & Thrill • a Food Menu Pepperoni Pizza ( 8" ) ... $9.00 Beef Patty, Chicken Breast, Potato Salad plate $6.00 Chicken Nuggets ( x10 ) ... $4.00 Jalapeno Poppers ( x10 ) ................................. $4.00 Mozzarella Sticks ( x10 ) ............ ... $4.00 Taquitos ( x10 ) $4.00 Chicken Wings ( x10 ) $4.00 Meatballs (x10) $3.00 French Fries .................................. $3.00 Tater Tots $3.00 Garlic Toast ( x3 ) $2.50 Manwich on Wednesday $2.00 Corn Dog $1.25 Taco Tuesday $1.00 Bottled Water ......... $1.00 • *Special Sauces provided upon request A-8 t r I Vii: i. CP L L Pt f am e: E c ,, 4b, "34,, / 1 . lie ;; a c CD ft n 4.0 0 c________ , , „,... . .. 4 E ingl CL) - .` it n i, it j ' as 1 i TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department CITY OF RI OHO CX Et p4aft FROM: Rampaw Rentals, LLC/President Peter A. Wright AUG 1 5 2011 RE: Entertainment Permit/Section 1: Filing Requirements#4 • ..kECE G3h .rd /: N i DATE: August 15, 2011 e : Attached is my resume which shows 25 years of Security and Law Enforcement training and experience. It also includes ABC training that probably exceeds any bar owner in the city. All employees have been to ABC training and receive daily training from me. My lead bartender has been here 6 years and also does training for new and current employees on what to do and what not to do in an emergency or potential problem situations. There is a burglary and robbery alarm system in place by ADT along with a 12 camera security system, 5 outside and 7 inside. My current policy is that whenever any person even appears to be having a problem with another person, both are asked to leave and come back another day. If the problem is substantial, they are advised not to come back for a specific time frame, 30 days, 1 year or never. If the problem is serious, the Sheriffs department will be notified. Although I don't have exact figures available, I can say that out of all the calls for service to the bar, 90% have been initiated by me or an employee. Besides fist fighting the most serious crime reported here since I've owned it was a stolen vehicle. After reviewing my security camera system, I later helped Sheriff Deputies arrest the suspect when he returned one week later. So far I have not needed to hire any security, doorman or bouncer. In most cases I believe they create • more problems then they solve, especially at a small venue. Most patrons are regulars who know each other and are aware of my code of conduct and ramifications for violating them. Employees and the KJ easily observe and handle problems as they occur. If they can't, they are instructed to call the Sheriffs Department as they have been trained by me and their ABC training. During Karaoke,which was very successful and uneventful for about 5 years, these patrons are also regulars and most of them only frequent the bar just for Karaoke. Some don't even drink alcohol, they just want to sing. Because of this extra business, I would have an extra bartender or bar-back. This allows for one of them to leave the bar to handle a problem, while the other can attend to the bar itself. I had and will probably only have Karaoke on Wednesday and Sunday evenings. The extra business was never more than a normal Friday and Saturday evening is now. As per my resume, I worked in a casino with entertainment and alcohol for 16 years and I owned another bar which was a nightclub. Karaoke is a very mellow form of entertainment which many people not only enjoy to participate but to observe as well, a mini American Idol if you will. � ti•-) Peter A.Wright 909-534-3385 • A-10 • "RESUME " As of August, 2011 Peter Allen Wright DOB:' (48 ) • P.O. Box 1872 5' 11" 200 lbs. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Single/No Children Cell — ++ Caucasian/ Healthy, Non-Smoker haftar None Military/ Christian Experience: April, 2005 to Present Sole Owner/ Operator Deane's Bar& Thrill Dec. 2009 to April 2011 Sole Owner/Operator Cougars Bar&Nightclub Crush 111 Bar&Nightclub May, 2001 to Jan. 2010 Public Safety Sergeant San Manuel Indian Reservation Dec., 1999 to May, 2001 Public Safety Corporal San Manuel Indian Reservation May, 1994 to Dec. 1999 Public Safety Officer San Manuel Indian Reservation August, 2003 to March, 2005 Campus Police Officer Crafton Hills College Police Feb., 1994 to May, 1996 Reserve Police Officer Adelanto Police Department May, 1997 to Nov., 2000 Campus Police Officer Riverside Community College Police Jan., 1994 to Mar., 1995 Campus Police Officer Riverside Community College Police • Nov., 1992 to July, 1994 Loss Prevention Agent Say-On Drug Stores • June, 1992 to Nov., 1992 Regular Police Officer Adelanto Police Department Aug., 1990 to June, 1992 Reserve Police Officer Adelanto Police Department 1988 to 1992 K-9 Patrol Officer Loma Linda University Medical Center 1986 to 1988 Hospital Security Officer Pomona Valley Community Hospital 1984 to 1986 Security Patrol Sergeant Selective Enforcement, Inc. P.O.S.T. Training Certificates Obtained: 1984 Riverside County Sheriff Basic Academy Certificate 1991 Reserve Level One Certificate 1992 Orange County Sheriff Basic Academy Re-Qualification 2003 Yuba College Basic Academy Re-Qualification College Courses Attended: 1. Introduction to Correctional Science 2. Patrol Operations 3. Traffic Operations 4. Principles of Investigations 5. Statutory Law •6. Crime Scene Investigation 7. Drug and Narcotic Investigation 8. Concepts of Criminal Law 9. Juvenile Law and Procedures Al 1 Advanced Officer Training Classes Attended: 1. Crime Prevention 2. Tactical Communications "Verbal Judo" • 3. Gang Awareness "S.M.A.S.H." 4. Auto Theft Investigation • 5. Intoximeter 3000 6. Pepper Spray"OC" 7. Arrest&.Control 8. Homicide & Suicide Investigation 9. Drug Influence Recognition 10. Report Writing& Court Testimony 11. Search Warrants 12. Civil Liabilities 13. Vehicle Stops 14. Domestic Violence 15. Interview& Interrogations 16. Officer Involved Shootings 17. H&S 11550 Course 18. Courtroom Survival 19. Drug Interdiction for Patrol 20. Crime Scene Processing 21. Parolee Contacts &Prison Gangs 22. Museum of Tolerance Tour 23. Tactical Communications/2°a Class 24. Street Survival Seminar 1999 25. First Responder Medical Course " 26. SBSD Police Supervision Course • 27. Hazardous Materials Course 28. Seven Habits of Highly Effective People Seminar 29. Terrorism Awareness& Response 30. Emergency Response to Terrorism 31. Suicide/ Homicide Bombers, LAPD 32. Taggers and Graffiti Investigations 33. How to Handle Difficult People 34. OCSD Police Supervision Course 35. A.BC. LEAD`.Trainmg_Course x3 36. Better Communication Skills Seminar 37. Taser X26 Certification 38. Pepper Ball Launching System Certification 39. Law Enforcement Response to Terrorism 40. N.I.M.S. Training 41. Walking the Narrow Road of Leadership Course 42. AB.C:READ.Trainug Coucsex2 43. A.B.0 Enforcement for-Peace Officers via Ontario PD Other Related Training and Experience: 1. 6,400 hours of Police work at the Adelanto Police Department. 2. 2,800 hours of Police work at Riverside Community College District. 3. 1,200 hours of Police K9 training from"Master K9". • 4. 700 hours of Police work at Crafton Hills College. 5. Had current B.S.I.S., CCW, First Aid, AED & CPR cards. 6. 70.0 Police Science College Units 7. 25 years working with the Public and Crjm 2 -- - - • 11 k ., . , •, • - • ___ , . • • -..- • , • - - " -t ' ,-- ..- ---, ... 4 . : ... -t- , ., it I 411111 gm IF.I.,: imelmia .___ __ _ ..1. ir.',..::.•1 ... .'-' :*-. "."..-.'-,--?t. 1 ..,_ , .......... 44' e: -Pir -• .. .A.t. ... `=- a; -$122k-.311:t ...,- .14... f,...- ..-_. _ .-.....-' _ -- -_, -'.._..1 ._.- -----"--- ' ____ ------ .....,--..-_ -... -...., ,m•• •■••.---......„..,...--TzL ......, --__ - . . _ .....- 0 SOUTH SIDE , i •4 . 4.i• 1,, r .4 , - 4 . 06 t•-• .... ,. Ii... . . 5- , H 4 ; , .. . - . N. . . *P*4 %6' 6 .• ..- - ... • • - - - --IT . . A. - . „ i 1 . 3r -- ...--.. -_,......7 _ fr, . -7-' - ---- . • . A-r1,, '• i ....... i ir . . I . i..._. ,.-. - - - •,-.- i . - . '••■..... , . -.- 0 . • .. .. ' ' ., . .,i'-v,.'' ---v 4,0',,•"" . ■ , .. t . . F EAST SIDE xHIBIT A--.1 ., - " _- • of 41 P4/I✓<: NOON ■ • _- ,. 1 - - • • • t , WEST (GROVE AVENUE) SIDE • L i 1E4 r- j _ I - - 0 INTERIOR (MOVE TABLE AND CHAIRS ON LEFT FOR KARAOKE) H-14 sue. .�, ..- , -0 , iyeifir ion . .„.„____,,.,...... _ ..., . , .,-_— f er ronQ 1 ze 211m I . 7.,.E\ti ki '4"_ ,kek, tg r ,.. . I . , . k. . s r. 1 ., _ , . . . I, .... . i iddi • gill! • INTERIOR (MOVE TABLE AND CHAIRS OTHER SIDE OF POOL TABLE) 12,-,.-4:27Lr° , r . v i...„ r C IM ■ ' i - .- a I r E 1 T i 'i r ' J - Aif r i - ---�-- 416i. f IP¢ • INTERIOR A-t5 RESOLUTION NO. 11-55 • • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2011-00852 - PETER A. WRIGHT- TO ALLOW KARAOKE WITHIN AN EXISTING BAR (TYPE 48 ABC LICENSE), LOCATED AT 8108 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0207-111-11-0000. A. Recitals. 1. On May 21, 1986,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 2. Peter A. Wright filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit DRC2011-00852, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application." 3. On the 26th day of October 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 26, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 8108 San Bernardino Road with a street frontage of 100 feet and lot depth of 100 feet and is presently improved with a bar; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is residential, the property to the south consists of Office Professional, the property to the east is residential, and the property to the west is Residential in the City of Upland; and c. The Business has been in operation since 1958 with no significant complaints of recent record; and d. Although the Business is nonconforming to Development Code Standards the requested Entertainment Permit does not appear to be an expansion of the use and therefore is still a legally constituted nonconforming use; and e. The requested karaoke entertainment is limited to two nights a week: Wednesday • and Sunday from 8:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. midnight and therefore,does not appear to be a nuisance to the surrounding properties. A-16 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-55 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2011-00852 - PETER A. WRIGHT October 26, 2011 Page 2 • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare; and b. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner; and c. That the applicant, or any person associated with him as principal or partner or in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business for which such permit is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of any obscene show of any kind or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude or has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provisions of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years; and d. That granting the application would not create a public nuisance; and e. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding single-family residential, office center, and nearby apartment complex; and f. That the applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of • material fact in the required application. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) because the project entails the minor operational changes to an existing bar, and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planning Department 1) This approval is only for karaoke. Any change of intensity or type of entertainment shall require a modification to this permit. 2) The days and hours of operation for the entertainment shall be limited to Wednesday and Sunday only from 8:00 p.m.to 12:00 a.m. midnight. • Any expansion of days and/or hours shall require modification to this permit. A-17 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-55 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2011-00852 - PETER A. WRIGHT October 26, 2011 Page 3 • 3) No adult entertainment, as defined in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17,04.090, shall be permitted. 4) Entertainment shall be conducted inside the building. 5) When entertainment is being conducted, doors and windows shall remain closed for noise attenuation purposes. 6) Exterior noise levels shall not exceed 65dB during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 60dB during the hours from10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 7) Access to the lounge/entertainment area must be from the main entrance to the primary use and not from a separate exterior entrance. Other exits shall be for "Fire Exit Only." • 8) If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse affects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. • 9) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform • Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. • 10) This permit shall be renewed annually by the applicant per Municipal Code Section 5.12.115. 11) In the event the Police Department determines that security problems occur, the applicant, at their own expense, shall provide a California licensed, uniformed security guard(s) on the premises during such hours as requested and directed by the Police Department. Fire District/Building and Safety Department 1) The maximum number of occupants shall not exceed Building and Fire Codes. The maximum occupancy for each room shall be posted as determined by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and/or the City's Fire Prevention Unit Department. • • • A-18 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-55 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2011-00852 - PETER A. WRIGHT October 26, 2011 • Page 4 • 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of October, 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • • A-19 STAFF REPORT FaC volt • PLANNING DEPARTMENT L% DATE: October 26, 2011 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00070 MERITAGE HOMES -The architectural design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the build out of 81 single-family lots on approximately 43.3 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the northerly end of Wardman Bullock Road -APN: 1087-201-01 through 07, 1087-201-13 through 40, 1087-191-01 throughl5, 0226-792-15, 0226-792-20 through 24, 0226-792-29 through 38, 0226-782-01 through 11, and 0226-782-12 through 15. Related File: Tract 16324. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 (State Clearinghouse No. 2003111057), and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 1.36 dwelling units per gross acre; 1.94 dwelling units per net acre; average lot • size over 18,000 square feet, minimum lot size 14,025 square feet. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Southern California Edison (SCE) and Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) Transmission Line Corridors/Utility Corridor South - San Bernardino County Flood Control District lands set aside for "Preservation" and an SCE Electric Transmission Line Corridor/Utility Corridor and Flood Control East - Existing Single-Family Development often referred to as "Sheridan Estates"Nery Low Residential (.1 —2 dwelling units per acre) West - San Bernardino County Flood Control District lands set aside for"Preservation'/Flood Control C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Utility Corridor South - Utility Corridor East - Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Conservation D. Site Characteristics: The site is located within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP), located at the northerly end of Wardman Bullock Road. The property slopes from north to south, and the project site has been rough graded and prepared for development. The site borders single-family residences to the east; to the south by San Bernardino County Flood Control District lands set aside for "Preservation" and Southern California Edison Corridor/Utility Corridor and Flood Control; and to the north by Southern California Edison and Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Transmission Line Corridor/Utility Corridor and proposed development has been approved for • Item B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00070 — MERITAGE HOMES October 26, 2011 Page 2 • Tentative Tracts SUBTT16072 and SUBTT14749, which are located westerly of the proposed project. ANALYSIS: General: On August 24, 2005, the Planning Commission approved the design review for 123 single-family homes on lots previously approved with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16324 (June 16, 2004) for Granite Homes (Ironwood Estates). Granite Homes has constructed 42 homes ranging in size from 3,731 square feet to 5,482 square feet and included five architectural themes: Santa Barbara Revival, Country, Ranch, Bungalow, and Monterey. Additionally, the site has been rough graded and prepared for development, including the horse corral locations for Lots 25, 97-119 and 120-123. The project was developed consistent with the approved Development Agreement for the site. A Community Trail along the north boundary of the project adjacent to the Henderson Creek channel and along the perimeter of Lots 121-123 will be required to be installed with the project. Meritage Homes acquired the remaining 81 lots for the construction of the Whispering Ranch project. Design Parameters: The applicant is required to develop in substantial compliance with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan which has extensive design guidelines and development standards to promote a high-quality development. The Specific Plan area is divided into distinct neighborhoods, each with their own standards and guidelines to create a unique character. The project site is located within the Etiwanda Highlands (Subarea 6) neighborhood. Design requirements of the Etiwanda North Specific . Plan demand a varied arrangement in site layouts by the use of different garage locations and the skewing of houses relative to the street. The Etiwanda Specific Plan also requires 8 footprints with 4 elevations per footprint/floor plan, which the applicant has provided. Plan 1 is designed as a • single-story house and is plotted on 20 lots (25 percent). The "Etiwanda Highlands" neighborhood has its own unique architectural design guidelines per the ENSP and requires a mix of the following primary architectural styles be used for at least two-thirds of the units: Ranch, Monterey, San Juan, and Santa Barbara Revival. Up to one-third of the units may use secondary styles: Victorian, Country, and Bungalow. The proposed homes are consistent with the required architectural styles and include floor plans that range from a 3,227 square foot plan to a 4,049 square foot plan, These plans provide a large yard area • to meet the demand of the current housing market with lots ranging from 14,025 square feet to 45,755 square feet. A total of 20 (25 percent) of the proposed house product will be single-story. There are 3 two-story floor plans and all plans have four architectural styles. The proposed architectural styles are San Juan, Santa Barbara Revival, Country, and Ranch. The San Juan elevation incorporates recessed decorative details, decorative shutters, wrought iron details, S concrete tile roofing, gable ends and shed roofs, and arched patio/entryway on Plan 1. The Santa Barbara Revival incorporates S concrete tile roofing, stucco finish, decorative shutters, metal and stucco pot shelves, decorative clay vent detail, and decorative finials. The Ranch style incorporates louvered shutters, lap siding, shaped wood beam rafters, flat/shake concrete tile roof, stone veneer, pot shelves, and front porches. The Country style incorporates flat/shake concrete tile roof, 6:12 roof pitches, decorative shutters, stone veneer, pot shelves, simple wood surrounds, and covered porches. All plans have variations in the footprints and a modest amount of wall plane articulation, thereby, avoiding "box-on-box" building forms. All plans have been designed with roof planes that have strong variations. Each of the four plans feature covered porch entries that range in size dependent upon the style. Plan 2 has a recessed garage, and Plan 4 has a side-on garage to meet the 30 percent requirement that houses have side-on or recessed garages. • B-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00070— MERITAGE HOMES • October 26, 2011 Page 3 be compatible with the architectural details, massing, scale, and materials. Staff requested that the proposed architectural design and scale match the existing development so that there is a seamless transition from the existing project to the proposed project. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Granger) reviewed the elevations on August 2, 2011. At that time, the Committee stated that the Santa Barbara Revival and San Juan architectural styles, as well as the Plan 2C, Country, had several deficiencies in the architectural designs. The Committee directed them to make appropriate changes to make them more consistent with the true architectural styles. The applicant agreed to revise the plans and brought the project back to Design Review Committee on September 6, 2011. The Committee reviewed the resubmitted plans and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. A. Technical Review and Grading Committees: The Technical Review and Grading Committees reviewed the project on August 2, 2011, and recommended approval. B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held on May 19, 2011, and approximately five (5) residents attended. The residents voiced some concern with the size of the structures in comparison to the existing homes that were constructed by Granite Homes and the impact to property values. The applicant explained that although the proposed homes are smaller in size, they were designed to match the existing architecture, massing, and scale of the existing homes within the tract. C. Environmental Assessment: In June of 2004, an Environmental Impact Report (State • Clearinghouse No. 2003111057) was certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the related Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16324. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor - revisions to projects considered within the scope of a previous Environmental Impact Report. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Design Review DRC2011-00070 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING DEPART ENT • Jam R..Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:CB/ge • B-3 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00070— MERITAGE HOMES October 26, 2011 Page 4 • Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Plan Exhibit B - Elevation Exhibit C - Floor Plans Exhibit D - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated August 2, 2011 Exhibit E - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated September 6, 2011 Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2011-00070 • • B-4 , ,...._ i 1 ,.. _ , ------------ \ ..\ lial a V WI. 71 ' ‘\t■ ' etit \ i EL • ' Li , •- it i__ ,- , . 4r4/Nipie . t. , Li 0-, a a bk4NN -41/41/440). e / . tic ili,Allia il 111 2 ■- ! sitt ,,, seri/it/cwt. , HI 1 _ 1/4, ,,, ie , ..„. . ,,...„„ itN i 4.1/4 , , . —1111.k:I• iiii , ......., _ia , i ti.,-.,_-_,_ nig A„../ ,4,,,744:4w, 1 , , - . r-4 _ , i '-- As.k.„1 ,;'• • -- ..-- b. i , -;-, 5 1 i tre.vat ,,,, rm. , s„..„..4* **,7-4,, - / 1k " , --;:s. cepa. ;.. , -.......„,_ * awpy ----. . _ _,. _ _ , , " "-----4—r_ tt 427 ti4 :lar ' .I wima ...„ . if . ,,, • e. , %,„...,„_,, ,, 4 ril r,' pi 1 it k 4,14.1p,V,J1J A 1 , n.:19‘.11,1“,1,=thh,44..g:t1SUg16,1 ,1 2 a Ea / I / I I I t AN\iv Aivite j/itt.4"Nciik.. nalisaih NI "JAMEEME12/AMME/H1 •1 - - - ' - - - " 44,:v _gik./Yerta&Millir 1111111SISIZEIMEIMMINIS 4111/PS/V kW ' ti - 1 la 11111111SEMENIMMISIMMO 14, . ,a1, 4 ,?( - r - _ ii,milmEIRTHEmr all Ir.---- - 11119111=1:ZIMINESIMEN T'M WI; : -11 . 164111 ha ji x sutEgelyllyagnIg iguct2e le mg, -ar,==reree 1 1 litaiwinit 04..L-..e. I Elm; , VP ,77111gretr..,.61Wir VII I VIIIIIIIIIIIII Ail 'EMI! II IV arZti.rr----e ' - ','Elaimmivesuir" it'll' "Wirmai 4P 62111110 ir .r. we —.......rrp , - lint- 1 ihkeitesse ,k L gaii,i quaff •Inicaism milosIsa- w,.. , ...-1,,, - __ 2. di ; 4 a-...., ' pn, I enlr _as 6 1.4.1 gspi liAtrt ■bok tot/ w,a, z ' ir 'ilinVilf 1/ 1.18"" ,„.,. . _ ,..... . . - litherld r•---r ,,,,,,,.44$17ortly 1 1 ei ler. ' isig prz .41 ' IV" • PH t ill" / l'11:11 • • -1 , li i i ,,1 , ,4 ., -, t'S\cr.,'t-1-1-1 :-,-2]..41--= - - - -2 — EXHIBIT A B-5 J t W a Marl . ii IL e E W w e Q ❑ O > 1- UM u -1 /(, W O OE 0 W N .-: J < W C O J Q V/ U N in- C '� ;i $ 0 U C J J J P.- 21‘° >1j -O c- 5 r o RE < e U < w < e W f, _ _ 0 5 z 0 U' \ c r z z 0 " 2 _ w 0 J a d - w in U U w c W a w In _ 0 _ 3 O i ¢ W _ OY Wow W W W U W I _ - ,-` - O ? W IJ < W m[P R. Z , K 0 0 C- C ¢ w C LL W K L ? J = O 3 O w C C u m` . >- S O ` u ] O O a 0 o zO O O G u Q O W Z W = 0 0 0 O : •a w �' u_ U ul In 0 O O Ib ❑ 3 In ❑ 5 f L 'w C > w UI ._ O m ❑ ; w iltilA O .^ V OOOOOOOOOOO OOOO r e ®06® N ® d g iz Z V W .0,81i „n-,61i O W 1 111 00 00 O 00 000 if 41 _a I __ ■ A4x1g L.D •iRBI. /':' E `�I III :. �''I = o O Iii LI I'� r U L N f 11-121::: 4 ._ © Z 1' l.= Ny e h. o z I� :d!I o �I • /• / I 7.1 M V H al 1: :�11 00 W Q �.�� U r :gr : Z 11 :I 111 U 1 e W a /� (� O i LL • Y LL Z 1 s / F II O I 711j . ..E A d t1 UO 4,I .+ a ' t� 2-' _ 0 ,1 Ild..alr..ua i .11 111" e i � t C • 3e5: °l�j li 1.: > eC au m.ua o ,.: E ❑ .mm :uw :.I 000 0 5 it 6 'I U Z Z N N Em m8Um 9� • tau . S; t it EXHIBIT B B-6 N 1� o Q I?il p c < �ll • C J p U. w p W N In J F C °W E W u. W Y W , O U — O ¢ N Z G W 0 J ¢ U t m a J 0 U) W m ¢ N N = 0 Q < 0.- W E - < - 2 J - C < W tj < 9 Z - CrE,ILI 6 N R V U lL _ J < W N C O i - 3 pE E G E O j W W w j U W W — < 75O ° O = > W > i 2 1 R ILLI < < O - § '±-' i Q Z c' W O O J < G J C W ° N w N 3 < ° ry .— !in; o U U d O O Q O ° O ° J F o U L p p u p 1' 0 r - w w W O yO w 9 a 0 w > a w w rc w W U N N m ° O tE ° (0 ° J E C LU C > > W ° ° fa O : C 'IdEIE 10 2 a-rin, GeaDeeelOegg©00©Seelleeeeee E- -WI w ' i, 'I ZZF 4 LL 0 000 3 333 0 e ©Q ® t€ , I!r!!Lol = . “a 1 ' - 'E3n1 ;aa I ' ,❑no � _i__ V ) _ e Z o ct re,,� -- - = IIIIIl) Q NV 1411 e r Z _ ■�, V9@@ cc I ° W a. a I r 5l l � � d CO < — t'kitel ' `^-,‘`,C1 o I� ��'..., Z s 1;,-91,,, 'e 0 2 I l ) 6 i ii 9 le 1 i 1" I --r z Z a ASH 1171.1115117.,, li Se f 1 , d-' , _c G lc t 1 1 All l :;' il: ¢, l �I 181111/1 II i _.—�J� e -� 0 __-2'111ail vl Z e e - U a Z IL o < o U C E° keli nisi?? • B-7 • i Fin EMI r .•■• rind _ �_. / I e—e 7, ammam �J IIl r� .1_ s3 1 .:11111 I i - F 7 I °l 4 Cml / ° ..Oa U Po., Inma i v°° J-- . _ _ /mamma / 771. a u\ g e uuum C it 1 m.m.mmm A m.m�.mm mama... \ 'I / _m mama\\amm I 777.777 Aj.'• 2. mum:: co En y — 7717777 I l _ 4 3__8° *Mt '111117 \ .� 1�H : 'p...... 1C+ � item.. .:777 3 /�mm. �7 I a \u m. �'ta p77 — .. I 1.11117•..... I. WV lee.Aim:. \1 I -_I- :11771717 0 o �'s: ° { ' I Z 0 I 277; mkt 1 iv g ° I ' 1 mama mama • 1 . . � n 1 it DUD \ 11 p O . 1 I m �9' ° i a > Z itt m 111 1- a I l A I L L S Et I tz ml W a if I O nl a z CO a U S 0 P 4 N E #�� 619 d ?M6 y m �p G. E87S 4 ■ w o i'-u FP. IX 7..it 1, i 'rill B-8 • 31 1 a !� nl • „ ,.,,,, _ ,,llllll , I ... I I s I : dill IIIIDpI / i . s 'Ir,. ,nolm uwlvu, 4:: :::::ir, 1 d: :` • MatI� /lam; °5 E l; I:u:::"I- I 1 ?gip i i 11:::::t - IRI I .-Ng e LIJ / 1u:: 1 Ann I! V co I I Inem \, i AOr IIiIIIW j W I I:: 1 ! I- I 1`} I.'l: H.w!14`27.-2' S fie: \ /dpGtl vIITT jl' ,`I I I ■4 I 1 / ._ 11 / L.. I IIH• Sal as c. 1 y� I_� 11,2C� = o \ keel 1W -i— -I 1h Q:IT ee ,t\:.'i:u, ::7 -- ` - Z rc 'I::: . __ malt loth r 1 re ix- In `•:. ±I'I : o\,.,, p••\ , , \i:i� 1:::::: _ 1:::::4'.,^ ' ''. c 0 U sic 1.l ` Lu 1...: :.: m L......A A W 1- .m.. 0 70 s. ■ 1" rn Io IY 1 \ I K E tX R U a 0 f In U e) S 1. q0 i .4 O 1 tea= Q II J IY 0 b U ' h I. i g2 \/\/�'/ n za� o re $V \ n K—A mm i u' a • fa-ii ql i„, B-9 • F a ■Ma III EMI ti i Ii9dtiPPP Viral as PP, � �a% ;r1 fill) �`iliiEl ��JII' 1 jil �y1 J01 I, :11:1-1-! y F N OR: • _I P'{�' F: at' c�ni g Lapp O i �� - too 2 lei, I 6' + IP li I v t I {P ��I i 1101• II. VC I.on q a I,L�. I s �— PI I j1 ..L® _ 1___ I � Il,i; , o• "9; /' 712111.! ly9;1' i p°Ii, e�= S� • rxxvv.• ;tea d U 3114 S Q`4 I-I y,{. Ifs Ii� � '1 I PI 1 f ' ��i� J//�/Jp 'i, II P ,f �, i 1 4-1 II! if ] 1 �cvz-acs =v \\'Q`; P� �� fill" I° " i, %' a 7011 i I I I :J///.; plu4 I IuF!1 :1":1- 1 c V o a re I 4� {;(— 111'. I I , `o (7 i f I'- W (�il j u Z y'` II •OO m � fO i4 w • 1 z 1 w • ozo • CO < U J U 2 q0 i �2 n 3 Jr -.1"e m Y • X U 1141116 :rah Fm Aill m Pbu.m pU � Z KUm —i pa,,3 ?ZS.a' ,dip • B-10 nom- In Ciii] alea • in lc i 1. a- -141: ��i i ? as 1 €P.i 4;1 .'=.47/' p C C 4CG FL i 1 <E:: o i S 4 4014 V pp 4 i J m� '' i i1� 9k e i�� ry a , inil !i� o,; ?u o i O I�of 4 iyP;U U iii ` Z E. ki!i a o • �7,-�1 C4 e€4.1 . • It CD � d Z a I11111=. 17.Ia�� W — F 1:41:1 d 00 J O J 11.1 Q I I I I 01 0 \jv , . ; b a = �/ o ▪m V/. 2 U U = O 2 Z K yy& 10°0 Y A AS sialkalle 6 rg A V S 2Q rl_a1 I Um • :9d B-11 • • I a Mall in ni! :-.1.4goi I - JP - 2 re _P n i u 4 C&C A em ® 1 Wun¢A AIM 0 a K _w N WO a ; y 11111 — n - q k£ 2_! yy 1 I Lill®� -� a ; ;i; t JJJII p i1 dpppS A st_ � ..= y la�Il� _ - - )41, , as a , = s c Cc o) a = mm�� .:::: ,- • D I mB _ e . � -mum r Do d ?IDIII w Ow q cn I i j K U I W Q I "I a 0 N U ■ J U 2 2 q O I ■ ,z z cov u In ■ u - o 0 o u '6'p E m C 2 5 JN ; 0 B 12 { 111 -4.21 LL t:0 K e a ■ •O ad mom EMI p g W in �a 5 Ew O W p O (0 > H w Y < w w O I ¢ _T r m r U< ry J In ' - w wink; w . 7 < I 4_ °V/ i J I L m _ < r f w C p w w < < < W <W p e 0 > < 0 DE ry a z m W ❑ W y 1 9 C V 5 Z 0 C N w O !O LL L < w O < _ w ' 3 0 w _ w w m w O w > H ma w O - w w p > 2- O n w < g O L- 0 3 z < < 1L ' :5 1 Z iW O 87 < < w < w❑ > m❑ w m w m n 3_ < ❑ = O O LU _— R 5 8 9 H U U U O O OOp O p m < m O w -I p < O I O K g O = r w w < w O O O w Qt O X ? W z w w L V uIn m 0 ❑ ❑ mos ..] 2 0_ > W O O m 0 n ;�I RI IR . R 000000000000000 See eeeee ee a ' },. - 1 I A ..oIszs 'r o ezz LL O O 0 Oe © e 0 0 ©e ;;!i !S3 h I I r-_5..:: i a� rid\\\v 1 €Ill p. .!}}!1!!!}I 1 , ,,/,,.. F TJLb k 0:::::: it eel e r;slim_��II� I o\ r 4: ,pCC 1 /�. : li �� ryl ' ��i" :. u IM:::: w— = a co i J ` r %ni ' V o .....:::n 1:: :•F: = Is i \ a a a Q1 &e9 ql I i- 1 ' U P P L - W Q I 1Ia3 ME A \1 _a 0 tun. II DOD.. I1 ■_ > \. I I, r ifs = .r < . ,4I co © o ® © e 000 H Z Z N t 1 F� 1 Sfr[6Y we,2q Sr 6°r Z-V°m ,q- • r W�: B 13 • J N �1 0 o Q sT$1 • tt O < �`� J Q pQ L N 1L. K w z W LW w 0 LI- a 0 O 0 z a w W -_t_ m N �t''� U w — V/ 3 5 Q w U` W Q J ¢ U m 4- - U' W f It > J m �- E U r- 0 U Q J J e_ `h W p e O 5 Z S r Q ry B C Q .. Bpi.' O m 5 5 < W 4 >'t x I_. z [ ? 3 ? s; I I M I�� ET csi EME 11111!" I ,...di aff __ _ a .1 L III � :::I :' 00y 4 *°.- ,. 4 ;� �„, .Ii «3 't r e CIE € f, i i r T., a -11_ 4g e Ir II , —II - /I / ..: ,I l a li I -1 0 !--F--',.!:: : -7°. T, r jj \1 it ! \\`\ \\`\ i p rat +F:: \ % +a�' giP \ \ 1 °° ;1.111: ! :0` `1\ i 1 \1 a�ilml.. :.1 1® n, li:, , • r r I :�:\\1 U. ..F" Ij�I _ Iii\1 \\ C p Pt \ `1 1 ' = s c Sh:h kair E2 6 \,w ( - Z m t - m eA55 1-E a * I I Ce e • I 0 I.vl am Z I .. 0 .: . \_ . Z n 1.,,k, .„,,,„■3 m Co(n a F U _ . n = U ►� :9 �(; IL. C I N i a i i 1\1 0 9 1 rc \ g ::'f i 'RIM 0 c I fla 004 - I S fU„ ... i pp W o :::::::: ::G ..\ I ra : Sti • ,1. ^ CUP —ail 615 0 uty I��" I ■ ? l a : EMI i1 JJ % n / 3tiu NOW / i:: I 2...._i_ /ivo• a --- 9 _ -av�maevvn a�vv�s s E i it ° 9 L j 1 I I/ II1 n' "j / !E� 541? C A RCRRI I {i� ll b 1 \ �1(�11 A C !$�y��•p Il:::�d::: :®_ _, g G , I['� ii _7'y 3 .` 1 / 1 n� z'� Utz w I :I I I 14 \\\\ t� ; it a I i tll'�J—I 3g I. \I ima,\\1w.w•:i"1-1 I 11 1111 ik øiii , �s s II\II W \N : 3t+h1\o4''T+ 12: J Z cce I Q • CD O /1 ri; • /•.' Z Q . : 11 II i •:': : II Q1 IL cf Co cf A e = S h. , Q AA\ ; d!.............,.......77.. - Go .. a ill N A /N I 4i'W, . li L C \•:mi 12 U • \w . j i an - E4 B-16 il me" Mail �l', • teal .....,,,i—JI [EIUI I" I I{ ill E ��,. .,. 1 '114 f WTI ( en w s . . II rim) v- ii, 1 111# °—9 :° /// %/Id 1 oI f{ l T a o E 4 1 I' .� ° -T,.. II: II 1 C aaRC.. e III K )1 1 irl* I \ i 1 1 , L I, �,i i E:==- II ni 'fit+ --i_ _ Y 11 i o = e f o 4S�i II -" d o W Ililgi U 0 sI ml re o • 0 Z U `! ` z 1- Qo ) I I w la a i 1 S �Sf NT�G�.mf� o � m f .� tIVP a ' .,TT�.'n�'t V _ e � a ! !y�i S i, I On . O Iii®1, • w � S F. o cc a f;EI9I� S I h17;fi;l SSl IIMSth (I 1I Fii vAr _Gl: I�I I lea"le ill le ii41.1111,11.0:1111•911119111111rILII F., 2 I :q.y . I _ I 11, i ga 111:11 III : — It': m �a 1?1 Is j W i^u2. I , 1!I�1,I " Ilii!il li �+:::i I I IIi'4:�asen e f N P{{ ` li B-17 E m I g -4211Ca" • e E a ■:Trl I I ein -;..,..„.... .;,=, C 72E4 E iii 13. I PEE : - e:+oaaunwao.xua a • G4 I F €I l NatIET wa a,3.s my r a .Pm Iir HIMPAII giiiip. 1 11 I g .1�.'1i'II' ppT 'fir f' C L 4IE¢ ,i� VIII J�u��f MINN I / 3CI : 'rr�\\\\�Isu rr� 1111 ..LEI L.n iamn J!r ill l� fd1�11 �� °�. ar .1 - �S3d r ' +. i 1 n 7 ti . S o m : = 1111 i _ YI s. a II o gitgaii al I,I0Fh w s 0 z r4 • gl N 0 E 0 a= Z O - IX 2 U y a- iook:E. ;: U IIII 1 GLI Mo m �MI. VI'I'I / K 1, 4§51 iliMi a C ®M �a I u +l4 I� -{- C Eli o F 'o e ,__ _ - a_x s 13114 5:1. B-18 co f to rl W _ r ■in All • ° ¢ E'er C a O co 5 Ira F 2 W F W W W < ° O > O N ¢ N F Z O F a O w 0 0 N w a J ¢ U 0 - U W Ca > J N F J ec O U a J WJ o a - I—W O —, rc 0 .- a g Z m DE a Ww Ott x i z ❑ z ❑ 33 $u o C >O W O N m W O 1, ° W ,- ? 6 °oiI Y Z rO a r C r ¢ F z J 1u N U C .?4. :2 N Y J W C W C 0 y O O O u j u O O O a O O a o w i u 5 j a 9 p z w N ❑ ❑ ❑ n >c - _k w u U Low C ❑ ❑ Ib ❑ N ❑ F C C > _ p m CIS 000000®0000©000ee6®ee04900 c 6-i E 4 / .ODAZ; XI 6 90 Al 1 I1 iii! zi1l1Illli I pi B - - Eill o 7211 { 1 —MI!1 f! I; s . _.c �II I � _ o • i IIIIIIII�I 1:2;11.., 0 4 saa� 1° r— IIIIIII!I IIIIIIIP ;1;11i z &t.•I ry--pl1 1_ 1 1-1 I ` I (1';111 a Q to 111111 ( lllillll I = , I J X11111 I IbUli 11' J '•1111' - - �� iiili i.:7 ,'� Milli 1 P.ei 111 Z r LiS1?4 ff UJJl 0 ` _ - 11 '- I C I+ " 5 11111 a i 2 II I .. I111;Ip' = Ba® ° I• I 3223 gil U re � a u E _ •I w _ 2 • — -- a • z Y (fis O©e 0 LL t S P.E' z"=ua l • u ^y'1 raf B-19 w o¢ ■OM R 171111F-21 liEr • O O f Ls tO LL. in It W C w w w < ? a - ¢ - 0 O w w ti V < > C a J x< U 0 d J (9 a • w E J I n w t 2 O a o o < J J Q J m—16 - W 5 = C O Q S 2 m , J . 2 < ,,, < < t < - h n H. u z O O . : z w O m t W ❑ t 3 @ w , w o a m O i _ 3 0 p E a. w a. . < r w w w w w w O 0 w - > m > y z U J U L h VI O > > > Gl l, Y Z m J O O a- < < < la > d ? 1.4 J w 0 Q ❑ < < < ] . C u 0 = C C 4 X w C ❑ ❑ J T m m - O w C C C -YP„$ o u c h O O z O O z O 0 ul < vl O w J C O O r 0 II C 0 m 1`n = o o �o 0 3 2 a 0 5 E ° w ¢ > > woo m o �Jy! y elq!IR 000000000000000eeeeeeeeee a ; Ill w 1 0 LL © 111111 o I ill _ i , av": q'' a I t: 0 0 1 ti�l l t o 1 Z K o ' "'? i o I: 1 ,- 4 11) 1 z� In d n:;! ` \� o 11••11 ^ : 111 CO .,,.,'. •�� c� < . ( II U 11 �I 111 'M - 5 'r: dale.1.. :JJ® Z Z ~ ' 1 11 Z I Q 1 , `II— ' I 5 CC J 1 ^ I,.....o (J(� < I VI CL z i'......... I•T� bF u 111 1� I]1 �I y U ;mamma I ID 1 1 a 6 7 < WEN I I':! C Ip:u: 1 I II -I :::E e O b 0 0 0 o I! OD 0 ® e < , z z w 1 I 5 ie FiP $6 I F= da, ny..ts B-20 N �- - o Q O O C J 1E M• ill • Q p F J J w C W z si n < 0 0 U > F . w O z ❑ C co Z <ir< It/ 70 j < C N< w I( N w a C U ❑ d O Z 21 N Zr E ¢ O < — LL O J K O > < j C U < W < < t < - i P I- O J Z 0 0 ♦ Z Z W W U m t ❑ W . <— O 0 w z w W w 8 1 4 2,• W O O r ¢ < > 1.< 0 < z _t > F r i- z Y , M1 d ❑ ❑e m — m w v 3 U W❑ < < x < o— Pip y • zu � _ 0 0 z 0 Z OO m O W O O O S O - w L w O 0 w w a w 3 3 < O z w i ¢w U m m m ❑ ° c6 m Il ❑ _1E 4 w K > > N ❑ ❑ m ❑ C C L gRlil_i " OOOOOOOOOOO©0009.99GOeOW0 N a ; Pt W C O LL a]a] 6'BZ: ..trLZS � ill p 2 p o �_.=.4.,==z4,_ ® - �__ pp a8aioa pir'I� r J�-1�I�I�� e •( ®l® � l e = 4 116`fll( III 1 + 1I N lik��Ii� l C ' ',..� ll�Wit y .1 II1Io Z 6' ii, 9 '� , ; o "nun not o a ° I i�g� I I� J IIr �' „ • �p� (`1111111 '� l_ 111 i u'si ll III " ""I 1111 Idylp1dygl„1 0 O 0 L ( 1 lsl n8l[I e 1 t:-11_ll 11' I �71 f - IIIIIVI CO l'1 Z 6 I. ii JLll� 111 el CJ F I[!ri Z ! g !i it Q 1 -� 'l?' e ��V�iDI 111111 l III�I! U I ILG 1,1,i¢I„Ilvoito _1 U-1 d PPII1ilgi;'ll8� g�llllll iyiiIili�ii iii i r' 1£ a Allll mnnull s s a o /, u� iI 0 Vgi1SIP = S =tII IIIIII) '_ >. o�� " 66 6 b z o eb e €.6 b LE - = m '2)O < ry U I NL 6 U C 1 1R;m m I8 Is 1 a —{ • y � , ry i, B-21 E I A"i .I M E ■.'/l • 1 .-. . Q 3 rail nl ( . I 1... .. \ � § /( o^ iI I I -- o . ., all 1 1 —� 1\\ r? c 'z tRIzP , , oa ,Ilf . 1 W . I\q \11 it 11\\\ ,-I�r IEQ' [IDOO �N I..q H: :1 0 \ a s 1 ::\ I::o\\ 1\ a �`''` \\ 11;1 ri. 0 lli \1\ v k:\ I='_m I i w .1 d Lai 1 can U I I Z o g1 Q LLI a 11 t ; Z 1i. I 0 I /i :i::i Z Q - ::::::::°a;m Wiz: :...... ce Q . u••.�, a M U u I '\� i 1 a Ta manual IC • C //'• U •• k l .3..4 ' = 2 i L _ ' n k� IaI ° <t,v '-#sal o ::7 :JOU ®� W p :�!\4M o ®: • .. -i' i o m li �.\F: aVm z y�0 0 2 Pis �I MO `h, • I k$1.1.A$t (U it B-22 I ern .6101 na II 11111: ,: / sum ♦1111 I I ,,,:,,,s3., a, ,�� — Fan el/' lial CC�i A '' � ° mutt' I IP1 'a rf 'I.... �� %.` INN OS - 1.!5 i • cnat \uu ... C::::: sI A; , o _In int • 'I I IL:11; \ i ti t \ 1 n W :1:1- \\ t I CI w � emr-- �1 O\ % O j C u: J U N \ Z c I Q I a M I iu ul U Iu.:... I Z C I° . 2,6 101 uo A luo smoo0 11:... . I_ et 00 .I1., eM0 W o si m� : IMO co EL z i maw q I. FS C Il:: ::4 '>--a+«'...-Dl:_SL-Xi ti,xa1\\i+5 Fin I I.\ I 14'1 y:\\ d 2n U� • • B-23 ei 0 2 IR Mil MOW � , q. 2 C. }\/ 4 El TO i !e UN El |/_ )j. % B: Ik} t :t a . 0 - [ \ ' _ ; \Sa\ ( 0 4 ~ 0 % %ƒ, - « . • U/ � ;/k : .I o ¢ �\ I s1 1 1'l �� t a ■arl b1 I • U vm_ 1 r1 t�� It� I, �. I 'ITA Imo' a I u i' J�II�1,11; 1 iii 11 1 I [all M: :Q 1\1'\1. !1;{S'II w ! \h.i 11 n 1 !®� - 1il i I1 Yang liqd N t I—IE I/Ir4 1QI c a. 212d . •nil fl k', `� 1//%/' VII au no" §1i. 1I a I II.„7 a en ��. II ICI® 9't u-- IIWO _ic WU 1111 u {{ 9 � �4 I i� y C -!pi x w I5� �� I I. `rl 11 HE 1 IIII,', ; h w i_I 11 f 1 I 0 0 U s 1' I Z o Li C a oont bi re w 111 1 -..1ev^es^x .'.:..E-... -tee ` • Z 1 1! Z a O I U 00 W Me al :_z nn ' _ o CO a 11.1411 = o 1111! ll ! tii 1111 ! �1 V or I ! p��,'td �� snu. 1 M IY�IILI I,, a .t p14E1� Z I 11'11 rc w.,- �<x. o 1 1 -. k �ai = Ii i�r. �c, w E VIo I`` Y K 2 m Z Vm I • el:i A GI, B-25 2 ail — el Mail • _ $ '__' ___� b L. i� m gii 1��, [� Timor� 't 't'tt ipI,�A�AA, �� + i';t t!{p,y5'ytii4i'il ;S § I j �nm®nail : off'+ xt t u _ V °iii ;:i.7,0,,,ri� i�i�ii a�„6 o � t,.l,i 1,111 �• A RN A�t , _ 1 -=1. ,ate; 'aa} „'� I 7 °5�� VIII i�;�i n ■S 5 it �"s I 3 N2l3 al --- 3 AE; `o Iy,. f I I I i 5 _4 y d 2 Y A 4 _____ G� X11; V o 3, Z C —I l < • a €I Lill a m - - - 'I— il� I1-i Z U 1 o _ ` I < EL z r. —_ ' =EATC-- - 1tr z If n - cc re 4 v. ll IggEi 'MI, F-1 __ IIIIII rp i i aii 'llil =____ 1 1 II;III - _ _ ��IjII4'1't a? ` Ill E'�i;1 J itIillui _e A $5`m . _._ w :u SS ".:. AMP 71IR'�118llllll 1. £" P • F eq.Sw't ,9E� B-26 • J r" a • O a wow r W K 0 s X W LL' 0 O «J- O U W °—P < a z N❑ F Z± 3 Q F F xit Li, W < - x 0 mdo J F LL Q F a a O a 9 W O O 5> a m ¢ a a <7. z m L ` w - .S H c r - O z k z LL0 w ❑ S W f l, C o U C J J a W ❑ 0 0 _ ❑ C • O W n 2 > ` m : N >I ' < = O N O > W O w —_ ` r ta O z U L z J r °5Z r O O J C � w C ° > a G E N W W IW 3 a ❑ a - = G o— 21 a o J O O O u- O O O S O = H 4 O 0 L- O e C b O W Z = 2 W L U W 0 m ❑ ❑ tn. ❑ U ❑ 5 E G K 7 J N O 0 m ❑ • C R CRCIC 0®000008CX DDDO0 ee0e66ee0® a' ILI' e y. W C e .iASZ: , .9'.SZ. / .. t Tieit p /2 1 hr 3 47446 our. immil:S I e M I t1pn C M e ::% o ° I ' ; HMI o e z _ Q N P . a? Q G h:: :IP I IH d CO II Cr It.0000 11 p I 1131 w n S' U z li ,P1" �, e I 1 Z 1- e - »,, , g g .,, j1 1=1;I /_ W o z 7: ° 1` i ! cc K I a- 1. II t ,. M., z _...0 % T m r1 71 a `` i i ct © i O O e N CO e e \l ) . o"I —P tlent; y(f B-27 J N ' • a Q t�il J EMI _� ° �$ W O W :V e w w w r W O G . O ¢ N C Z < N w C ¢ m < J C 0 m n J c9 W O J C > ' J Z < $_ 2 Q K o < W < < y . a-9 .5§ u F ry g z O O . i z w w O m ❑ w K.;3 g O W IA u LL D J 6 W 'n d O < r- >i Z ❑ w w ¢ w < w > > > m > ,j Z > W l7 U c - 2 6 o > > ❑ • Ai 1 � F� I Q tTrI 1 1 u. dl \ is — i i I"`�� i'lllll W 1- - I it ,ti�I fl C�® al i� si I iJE 1 Iro '1 - limn pC�C2 -.'A$ G / I . I CI63O A d;la \ i -- _ o i 69_Isq 1111 K of P� �l o �4 W Ull 1 a 1 I t \ �` %' C 1 1 y 111: .1 -_ 1 4 BC7C _ 11 a "_.—_— \ F 8X16 IIf LOG]C7 111 \\ AI 1 i7 1 it IA e c La IT log �U 9 w II' 1 C i::q . Z o b. i a go e go 4.....11,1 0 'M ..r �p Z 1.....1.1 _�� V H n:pY i 77i/ ° CI.:::':'9 _ ; C Q 1 4i • .....q .I—. J W U a _- .. n 0 e rr'' N ti z f HEM o 'u U 11 1 I s R U G� nuu11I 1 -1= 1 a pg � C 8 NI 1 P. CC 1 op 1 ° /2 e . N WIR WI ,11 1 a•-.1,/t` B-29 5I a li �I I a ■:?rl • m, - run n I G t M I r2Ai. ii V i. R g m_ 1� ® l.. guarmrgr hurt _o` .1- 1.1io[I I _� Aral, ..,, MNI NWR N n:4 plafiVIMIM s3 1u\: %i�:• 1111 YtIM .INg'I q 1.0 /ARM i�E' 6 lial=il PM UM cc par_ ,.. : t:I _I - mog m. lB_C7C 1•� .:� a p� r, p o 1:.: A.::'.' J 4 IN I or U I J Z • I I/f J��45 T3- w 4:1 r4 14 Ci fail' 1I 1 U .....;I 1 _ 1 ■ 11 AMOR i 0 m1If ::rll 1 :. i • ::.ate ®I-1 z cc .:: uiimi Sy . €I :.g I. Ego Fu 12 ' 111': ... ;L: l ®IA P. re" 1 11 O Ep°°•• `d98e 1 , 4.1 ; .5s? •::SI a d . o� ,U:el Lry h • ft:. `11 ` I u F-V S1 _. l f y', B-30 s v . d Q " r� j1 E I •Eii , 1rx ;VIII 9 � / J / I � I11J // d�d,w 14/110; I Oil _ e_ Inn !MI ,,!J s ¢1 e�_ 7 nli 'Ph g .-.® 1 @ r0= I , / c r xu! 1 ll TO E •vriir, Wi'Y d v /', \ 111111 ® � a hll li .,,,,,,.a. (((\��4 trot ai 1'4 q 14.1 il; o e 0 nal 1:11 Al IQ�I', m in Imo I n id- {'Cll W ��®f `I I W �..� , .X11 m Sou' C Z C 10811,1 L!1: O I a I Et a w • S.:"'.—.::_:lam\v:. I 1 I^ O V III I 1 0111 H 7 a qO 11 1,1 ��'O U d O EL Onn 0 1 N P o m U o o > g I I 5 E� ',11 �® iaE 1�''i9if.1711�,C I - PW, 11'1 `ox C*2 1 . _ �ame I 41 — _ Asm 1 �M Ii\ A sc3d 41 L , V I , t B 31 Cif to 9d: 1111:7s1 • < EMI ring ae 9 2„ et rEAb € O_' 2 . I4 _ W ? .- i O t £i° L.. II / i J I AO E lr PI I! I! +fix£Iwni •7 1.1;11:1:1111 u s I'i a 8 f1 j i i I � �- a `1111 '� J ''11. I.I-1,,C; - I yy I'l, Is .1515 �£1,Y PI ti^i10• iL IA+r`.d 171 i17111i till i o = o J ® K III .t •t•si V � 1 I .t glom ••w—. °n Hh Il lll" Z z L� ql✓ 1ovl. . Sma °11 I I 'ENE' Ili i r.JJlJ.- ataf, ,°,� re ea • ' \\\� _ Nm� . awe e r'! F1 ! I IhPAW.tll VAA • i Z a 11 I .1411— I � o S2i lyf I l•.I °.Ilal Sail' LU. lil I 1°1I;:I li°III„Ffi a 7,3 1 it slily li iliiy.3 , p,?�I 111 i1 51211 11 D. z ,E 111£114 ?,Bb* iu.li ,S.I£,,i.l, O I SI 1411211,1 i I i. 1IIolll i1 LI1 lie. = f deli li a 11, I�Ili I ?i1 11 ° CO v IN yl I� iii rill: !f�}ilhi �ligi'�f i, o 1 — OM I w' 1 U •a i AV O'i • FU cv�t LtpiS 'OP B•32 l - �� ,g1 Irm •lI LLLIIr g-s-_l!ILLLILLIILIL is 'it L„ ti 99 ,!,l,I,L,l,l,l,,,�;l;L = 111 �_ P - .LLILLLLLL.L.L rim gi:_ ?� = ' 'II iii: - 'ic�� 6p g L{ ��il �1Pi1ü �^'�F l c f y 1. �, � IIIhI 1 m� ►_ �� w plIIIIII rt - L �� II IL II II IDplll' d 4LII :II��1V rsiii, � ,.... _. , I _ ° = 111111 = ;� _,I, - Of o n lYi = ll - .` 11111111 ° _ II!i W a SI = °gi ;911111 IIIINI 5;;; z re a I I - - f.Eig. I CD a RI III�IIiI ; __ ii[ F � L,, '!'I a , ,. 41114151 . m� _ _ ''.,IIIIIIIIII illllllll ii IL 0 141 a W f n = I U r I -H 2 i t -.,....: ,.. - 4 '_-_ S rig ,El Ilk lar- I. g :15.,,.:E.= 1 � - I IL1LLl Lk yLyt ,L I1�:l1 L�� LrL L'J� ail{ - ii,I .L,L,L, ry a 'Li1li� �� Lile i c i® lily,,,I 144E te - 1mil. ] 1111 y LLLIL9i IIL 1Iid��IJ�li� Iiep L Lr IILLL LL LI! gLitgit t.Zitiligit '7% 141L11,L.kll LLlfl1 L'i "Eat= ip,iii% II _ pc,pry L € MI, ' z a6m I in I mom �.aal°i.44§�h4P 'i .....em 443: y4,441AA Car T', .m zti!'al B-33 a Mao] • piria . -- ■ur.• r '•5e :': a—• �- hNRJO —— v iJ 8 MINI t.E r I R O LI g° 9 � J E G oI - 6p or p u g �v^1 . _n 8 14 - .,. ..� v .. I �. ,�.: .,., — .. .. =$833 o e 4 e ° u a4 ar ka a, ° qu¢ e V $ • Q� I � n re o ct .art_ autumn_ i U —ff� 11 '- 'V Par Z 2.6 Le ._ ., O ; a OW- 0 - 1 71 E. e U ce 2 IAN i��---._it,um upon._ WAR — py U' v xe°.a - lia'a00 01_ 0. O ____ a\I II II AI <, : en ® �. —r J E U `E O 5i: 5ii �C- : = O o ,op____0 :1 1:1 .____ hl n 1.1.1= 3: 'f. n— I I . . . . I i — 'I_I. i -4 TOME% -- III MI I I- i lm lm 'Oq.V ;.�= "_.. ale e - --NMI IMMINMEAMWMINIMI . .„ o '.uucl.:w..F.r— 13.x' a — dF 1'.uo.ml� __ I 5 O RS CCU ONII COT77 U I I II j 1 CIS pH ..I • gg :24!1 EXHIBIT C B-34 Qa:Td in . ..,_ _,.., nig 2 ,P� S` 1 E u e—Q ,1 a 9 \ m M 10 0 co l` I' DV all eimma =_:f. is b ?LL g-i. ly Afl I ' IM� N 'ei INSII,® I mirr Nall,. 1[ [5-.3 1 -off — `i. ,. tt . E L. bard;.�o 4 �" ■ z re - o• _______... o' ' Q 11 � 1 � lil ' i I t 1 : : i .--,. ■ ) : !I 'N �m is . Il - — L Z r, t d Lt o' mV.®i ;35 e 6 61 oea ■ 6 .I m o F P1 H E . I I f ■ I ' e - a W a ce a o 2 U R = O 2 U C 1 U `u 0 8° E p_p,is 718E; y • 1"(011 B-35 a ■_ grim 0 L. 0 t, 1 i __ o m oap� 4 \/ m o ? IllllC'T'1IITTTTIIIII--- o LL _ C n m E G9R Ella Nb z N01:0 i;I 1 join ripnir, i ,_ '-%li it i r _‘tit, ,r.I o a i bkoa : I ° ' ! 6F oz c.,Z 2 Oil --- �mmmmmm� ' �cILLI op o vo∎INNI 13� ry li�w L lrlNal Wl 2 011 ii- gfl n F_iy urn�A O F, Q 0 p • Bfr al L O O III MI - �11w re c F Z re .I �� w 0 CL o CO U J U ` t = o 2 U Z G £_m I x x g u VGGm 0 . 7-qt kukk t_tsti ca ' p� • 6.36 N: 111 ...12/ EMI 6" 11011111111111•11•1111111011111111• I� 4 p ' m—a Ri 1 I i �.. L a; _. . LL r�°a .T. .mO1R.0Y.. E p:=i- Ii Eelie ® ��s _W� 4� EU Oil)El IIP"Eil QT ._ Inal .: li. :''''''' -: • ..._'' . . „ . tt i'-''Ere: 2 'ACM MO I I....GL"\V.R.. INu ° g II i .Y..M-.Gi1Ei ■CItlf. 1.$R LlW _I I Wall BEAMS D C vY� l W : _ . 9(1 0` 0 ' rt co, a' u Z C a II e • 1, i .. �i n. I 0 Z < W a U W d U' d o [Zr Ni 0 E c1=tii1S1J'c O _ p CO a b V E = p .O.EY.r� g° e > z i Ian, m m iris i o. rreQ gliall i oat LO, . 5 x"a iauR . ;fate • .:0E1 B-37 el .4s1 in 1 t' Orin IrA6 LL .6 E. 0< � E. LL C 0P-0i i ri: ilk I�IIi11Tt id.� 0 Eu=o .I Pf= a owl Almon o - p% air. I • Oh =I - I . I alLLw Ilf I _ �ca:�t o .ter I O _ V -;sa'n TL:mi 2 g �i IN ;��o„ °'I s7 4 c� ,a- ° ° z cc alLn I i 1 I ° s. I : .. ` p ., c� _ T U Z rc - Ix Q U W Q 0 CL g Ill�Igp�!`I:H G Q n U e _ U o = O I' 2 m rem pq i ran pa 0 A v yyis t ;Um mUOm Pai • _f "V LEN: B38 • ti ifri 4 Mall LIM lioqi .a a I. E1 L. ! iii19 pl I I :FE ' ;:u6-; � °LL 5 I j } 1 ,_ @ 's 1117/11.1. lu it it 0 oa ins 6's .� �N -1 III. I. Z ° a. - 1____ . ' a ; ; � „ • :h e Z ig 11 ' �nnn� • �e•. III - z _ tk Nt -- waua�n to f - 1 an. 141yatl IIINIVIIIII 4, --,_ Co W et 61 I a Co oct U S.r r1 iiii.° ! �j a ci no _no rc cs E°' E amo gomoat a! L'1,--i P B-39 co riEnia CM 11& I R_ e Y IIelvRlee NN girl LL N 6 I�I�IA • rj ofil triL.777 rio ^I�IG�I�^ �I��/I II \\% �Y III! .� i7 ` U3 0 zr: '�ilPf 10,10,111111101 film ' ''= co z.V° C XIIIA O . Iali cram 0 • vanumm____ _— I A11113.1WPAY4 �I nf.. 1 -� �i�annrwl- 1 � ! OICs,I y = c IeI $_ 9 &e _ oo Z c I a I• 4[ � � e u 1 ,. 1 1l i1 �� ix _1_ {1I1II • ,. hiU :1 LJ---a a".it1 h , � Q N g` S , I 0 a O I 6 _ !I 1 _ rcd U° U = 2 A U O+•J illIOCII ,. .l it a J i .., ..E _ ., t 1 ,s gq I:2Un • Ii B-40 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:50 p.m. Candyce Burnett August 2, 2011 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00070 - MERITAGE HOMES - The design review of building elevations and detailed Site Plan for the build out of 81 single-family lots on approximately 43.3 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the northerly end of Wardman-Bullock Road -APN: 1087-201-01 thru 07, 1087-201-13 thru 40, 1087-191-01 thrul5, 0226-792-15, 0226-792-20 thru 24, 0226-792-29 thru 38, 0226-782-01 thru 11, and 0226-782-12 thru 15. Related file: Tract 16324. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 (State Clearinghouse No. 2003111057) and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. Background: On August 24, 2005, the Planning Commission approved the design review for 123 single-family homes on lots previously approved with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16324 (June 16, 2004) for Granite Homes (Ironwood Estates). Granite Homes has constructed 42 homes ranging in size from 3,731 square feet to 5,482 square feet and included five architectural themes: Santa Barbara Revival, Country, Ranch, Bungalow, and Monterey. Additionally, the site has been rough graded and prepared for development, including the horse corral locations for Lots 25, 97-119, and 120-123. The project was developed consistent with the approved Development Agreement for the site. • A Community Trail along the north boundary of the project adjacent to the Henderson Creek channel and along the perimeter of Lots 121-123 will be required to be installed with the project. Meritage Homes acquired the remaining 81 lots for the construction of the Whispering Ranch project. Design Parameters: The applicant is required to develop in substantial compliance with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan which has extensive design guidelines and development standards to promote a high-quality development. The Specific Plan area is divided into distinct neighborhoods, each with their own standards and guidelines to create a unique character. The project site is located within the Etiwanda Highlands (Subarea 6) neighborhood. Design requirements of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan demand a varied arrangement in site layouts by the use of different garage locations and the skewing of houses relative to the street, The Etiwanda Specific Plan also requires eight footprints with four elevations per footprint/floor plan, which the applicant has provided. Plan 1 is designed as a single-story house and is plotted on 20 lots (25 percent). The '.'Etiwanda Highlands" neighborhood has its own unique architectural design guidelines per the ENSP and requires a mix of the following primary architectural styles to be used for at least two-thirds of the units: Ranch, Monterey, San Juan, and Santa Barbara Revival. Up to one-third of the units may use Secondary styles: Victorian, Country, and Bungalow. The proposed homes are consistent with the required architectural styles and include floor plans that range from a 3,227 square foot plan to a 4,049 square foot plan. These plans provide a large yard area to meet the demand of the current housing market with lots ranging from 14,025 square feet to 45,755 square feet. A total of 20 (25 percent) of the proposed house product will be single-story. There are 3 two-story floor plans and all plans have four architectural styles. The proposed architectural styles are San Juan, Santa Barbara Revival, Country, and Ranch. The San Juan elevation incorporates recessed decorative details, decorative shutters, wrought iron details, S concrete tile roofing, gable end and shed • roofs, and arched patio/entryway on the Plan 1. The Santa Barbara Revival incorporates S concrete tile EXHIBIT D B-41 DRC ACTION AGENDA • DRC2011-00070—MERITAGE HOMES August 2, 2011 Page 2 roofing, stucco finish, decorative shutters, metal and stucco pot shelves, decorative clay vent detail, and decorative finials. The Ranch style incorporates louvered shutters, lap siding, shaped wood beam rafters, flat/shake concrete tile roof, stone veneer, pot shelves, and front porches. The Country style incorporates flat/shake concrete tile roofs, 6:12 roof pitches, decorative shutters, stone veneer, pot shelves, simple wood surrounds, and covered porches. All plans have variation in the footprints and a modest amount of wall plane articulation, thereby, avoiding "box on box" building forms. All of the plans have been designed with roof planes that have strong variations. Each of the four plans feature covered porch entries which range in size dependent upon the style. Plan 2 has a recessed garage and Plan 4 has a side on garage to meet the 30 percent requirement that houses have side-on or recessed garages. Although the proposal is to construct a smaller housing product than the existing development, and the proposed architectural styles are not identical to the Ironwood Estates; the project has been designed to be compatible with the architectural details, massing, scale, and materials. Staff requested that the proposed architectural design and scale match the existing development so that there is a seamless transition from the existing project to the proposed project. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion, Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: • 1. None at this time. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Decorative trims around the windows on the side and rear elevations on the San Juan plan should be enhanced to match the details shown on the front elevation. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Provide minimum 5-foot landscape planter between the fence/wall and the sidewalk on the corner side yards. 2. Provide minimum 5-foot double wide access gates from private equestrian trail to horse corral to accommodate vehicles and horse trailers. Code Standards: The following items are standards of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. The boulders from the project site shall be utilized and integrated as part of the front yard Landscape Plan, per the Master Plan Resolution of Approval. 2. The driveways shall feature a variety of decorative treatments with brick or other masonry bands and varying concrete colors and textures per Specific Plan Exhibit 33. • B42 • DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2011-00070— MERITAGE HOMES August 2, 2011 Page 3 3. View fencing shall be used along the Etiwanda Creek Wash (west tract boundary). The design shall include beige tubular steel with brick pilasters at property lines per Specific Plan Exhibit 27(C). The minimum height shall be 5 feet 6 inches. 4. Interior private lot view fencing shall include beige tubular steel with brick pilasters at property corners per Specific Plan Exhibit 27(C). The minimum height shall be 5 feet 6 inches. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the project. • Design Review Committee Action: The Committee members reviewed the project and requested that the applicant address the following issues: • The Committee requested that the applicant enhance the elevations of all the Santa Barbara Revival style floor plans and revisit the window box detail. The Committee felt that the elevations did not truly represent the Santa Barbara Revival style. • • The Committee suggested that the applicant refer to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan to review appropriate architectural details. • The Committee suggested that the applicant look at using more of the stone veneer (repurpose) on the front elevation that is most visible to the street, specifically on the Country style plans. • The Committee suggested that the applicant add additional appropriate details to the side and rear elevations of the San Juan style plans. • The Committee suggested that the applicant revise Plan 2C, Country, Plan 3B San Juan, and Plan 4B San Juan to make them more appropriate to the true architectural styles. The Committee asked that the applicant work with staff on the issues and return to the Design Review Committee at a later date. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Candyce Burnett • B-43 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:50 p.m. Candyce Burnett September 6, 2011 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00070 - MERITAGE HOMES - The design review of building elevations and detailed Site Plan for the build out of 81 single-family lots on approximately 43.3 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the northerly end of Wardman-Bullock Road -APN: 1087-201-01 thru 07, 1087-201-13 thru 40, 1087-191-01 thrul5, 0226-792-15, 0226-792-20 thru 24, 0226-792-29 thru 38, 0226-782-01 thru 11, and 0226-782-12 thru 15. Related file: Tract 16324. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 (State Clearinghouse No. 2003111057) and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. Background: On August 2, 2011, the Design Review Committee reviewed the project and noted several deficiencies in the design of the project. The applicant was asked to make revisions and bring the project back to the Design Review Committee for review. During the meeting, the applicant was advised that the Committee's concerns were regarding the Santa Barbara Revival and San Juan architectural styles, as well as the Plan 2C, Country. The Committee directed them to make appropriate changes to make them more consistent with the true • architectural styles. The applicant agreed to revise the plans and to bring the item back to the Design Review Committee. Design Parameters: The applicant is required to develop in substantial compliance with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan which has extensive design guidelines and development standards to promote a high-quality development. The Specific Plan area is divided into distinct neighborhoods, each with their own standards and guidelines to create a unique character. The project site is located within the Etiwanda Highlands (Subarea 6) neighborhood. Design requirements of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan demand a varied arrangement in site layouts by the use of different garage locations and the skewing of houses relative to the street. The Etiwanda Specific Plan also requires eight foot prints with 4 elevations per footprint/floor plan, which the applicant has provided. Plan 1 is designed as a single-story house and is plotted on 20 lots (25 percent). The "Etiwanda Highlands" neighborhood has its own unique architectural design guidelines per the ENSP and requires a mix of the following primary architectural styles be used for at least two-thirds of the units: Ranch, Monterey, San Juan, and Santa Barbara Revival. Up to one-third of the units may use Secondary styles: Victorian, Country, and Bungalow. Design Changes: The Design Review Committee requested that the applicant enhance the elevations of Plans 1 through 3 of the Santa Barbara Revival style floor plans and revisit the window box detail as well as to add additional detail to the San Juan Style plans. Additionally, they felt that the front elevation on the Country Style plan could have additional stone veneer added to enhance this elevation. Santa Barbara Revival .The Committee felt that the elevations as proposed did not truly represent the Santa Barbara Revival style. The applicant revised the three plans and added additional details. Specifically, they amended the following: EXHIBIT E B-44 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2011-00070 — MERITAGE HOMES September 6, 2011 • Page 2 • The front and side elevations of Plan 1, by adding additional Santa Barbara Revival style details. • The front elevation of Plan 2 was not altered, but enhancements were made to the left and rear elevations. • The right elevation of the Plan 3 was enhanced with additional details. • No changes were made on Plan 4. San Juan The Committee suggested that the applicant add additional appropriate details to the side and rear elevations of the San Juan style plans. Additionally, they asked the applicant to revise Plan 3B San Juan, and Plan 4B San Juan to make them more appropriate to the true architectural style. Specifically, they amended the following: • Added a decorative arch detail to the rear elevation of Plan 1. • Revised the coved porch detail on the Plan 2 to better reflect the San Juan style and added decorative details to the front, right, and rear elevations. • Revised the coved porch detail on the Plan 3. • Added a decorative arch detail to the front elevation windows and rear elevation window of Plan 4 • and revised the coved porch detail to better reflect the San Juan style. Country The Committee suggested that the applicant look at using more of the stone veneer (repurpose) on the front elevation that is most visible to the street. The Committee suggested that the applicant revise Plan 2C, Country to make it more appropriate to the true architectural style. Specifically, they amended the following: • The location of the stone veneer on the front elevation of Plan 1 was revised as well as the window placement and stone veneer on the sides and rear elevation. • Revised the roof on the Plan 2 and added additional stone veneer on the sides and rear elevations. • No changes were made to Plan 3. • Minor window changes were made to Plan 4 right elevation. Ranch Although the Committee did not recommend changes to the Ranch style plans, the applicant made minor changes to the plans. Specifically, they amended the following: • Amended the roof line and rear elevation of Plan 1. • Revised the window placement on the garage,of the front elevation on Plan 4 and added windows to the right elevation on the garage. • The floor plans did not change; the project still meets the 30 percent side-on garages and the 25 percent single-story requirement. There are 3 two-story floor plans and all plans have four architectural styles consistent with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. • B-45 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2011-00070— MERITAGE HOMES September 6, 2011 Page 3 Staff requested that the proposed architectural design and scale match the existing development so that there is a seamless transition from the existing project to the proposed project. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. None at this time. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will.discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. None at this time. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Provide a minimum 5-foot landscape planter between the fence/wall and sidewalk on the corner side yards. 2. Provide a minimum 10-foot wide access gates from the private equestrian trail to the horse corral • to accommodate vehicles and horse trailers. Code Standards: The following items are standards of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Boulders from the project site shall be utilized and integrated as part of the front yard Landscape Plan, per the Master Plan Resolution of Approval. 2. Driveways shall feature a variety of decorative treatments with brick or other masonry bands and varying concrete colors and textures per Specific Plan Exhibit 33. 3. View fencing shall be used along the Etiwanda Creek Wash (west tract boundary). Design shall include beige tubular steel with brick pilasters at property lines per Specific Plan Exhibit 27(C); minimum height shall be 5 feet 6 inches. 4. Interior private lot view fencing shall include beige tubular steel with brick pilasters at property corners per Specific Plan Exhibit 27(C); minimum height shall be 5 feet 6 inches. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the project. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed the proposed exterior modifications to the four architectural styles for each of the four plans and found the exterior changes to be in substantial compliance with the direction given by the Design Review Committee on September 6, 2011. The Design Review Committee approved the proposed changes with minor modifications to Plan 2C Country and Plan 3C Country to repurpose some B-46 DEW ACTION AGENDA DRC2011-00070 — MERITAGE HOMES September 6, 2011 • Page 4 of the stone veneer on the front elevations. The Committee directed the applicant to work with staff on the revisions prior to scheduling for Planning Commission. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Candyce Burnett • • • B47 RESOLUTION NO.11-54 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00070, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT 81 DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON 43.3 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTHERLY END OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1087-201-01 THROUGH 07, 1087-201-13 THROUGH 40, 1087-191-01 THROUGH15, 0226-792-15, 0226-792-20 THROUGH 24, 0226-792-29 THROUGH 38, 0226-782-01 THROUGH 11,AND 0226-782-12 THROUGH 15. A. Recital. 1. Meritage Homes filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2011-00070, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as the application." 2. On the 26th day of October 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a public hearing on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced meeting on October 26, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a, The application applies to the property located at the northerly end of Wardman Bullock Road and is presently rough graded; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant land and is zoned Utility/Southern California Edison; the property to the south consists of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District lands set aside for "Preservation" and an SCE Electric Transmission Line Corridor/Utility Corridor and Flood Control; the property to the east is developed with single-family residences and is zoned Very Low Residential; and the property to the west is San Bernardino County Flood Control District lands set aside for "Preservation"/Flood Control; and c. The project consists of a Design Review of 81 lots; and d. The project conforms to the basic Development Standards of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan with required architectural elevations, slope requirements, and overall project density. • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: B48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.11-54 DRC2011-00070— MERITAGE HOMES October 26, 2011 Page 2 • a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan by providing a variety of housing units that are compatible with the surrounding area; and b. The proposed use is in accordance with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located by adhering to all setback, height, and density regulations that govern the area where these homes are being constructed; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code in that single-family residences are an approved use within the Low Residential Zoned District; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse • No. 2003111057) on June 2004 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16324, Annexation DRC2003-00753, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00749, Etiwanda North Specific Plan DRC2003-00750, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00751. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i)substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Design Review, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe im pac t s than those evaluated in the previously certified EIR The review of the plotting of the homes on the original tract map(SUBTT16324)were discussed and anticipated at the time of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. The review of this project has shown that the homes are compatible in size and plotting as the other homes in the area, and the previous subdivision (SUBTT16324) adequately analyzed and addressed the potential environmental impacts for 81 single-family dwelling units. c. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission • concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Design Review DRC2011-00070. B-49 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.11-54 DRC2011-00070— MERITAGE HOMES October 26, 2011 Page 3 • 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the Design Review and plotting for the development of 81 single-family homes within SUBTT16324. 2) All pertinent Conditions of Approval from recorded Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16324 (City Council Resolution No. 04-207), Annexation DRC2003-00753 (City Council Resolution No. 04-208), General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00749 (City Council Resolution No. 04-209), Etiwanda North Specific Plan DRC2003-00750(City Council Ordinance • No. 726) and Development Agreement DRC2003-00751(City Council Ordinance No. 727) shall apply with approval of this project. 3) All retaining walls visible to the public shall be made of a decorative wall material, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 4) Man doors leading from the garage to the rear yard shall be raised panel to compliment the architectural style of the residence. • 5) Coach light styles that are utilized in the front of the homes shall also be utilized around the rest of the house to compliment the architectural style of the residence. 6) Driveways shall be scored in a horizontal pattern for additional • entryway detail. Engineering Department 1) All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 04-60 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16324 shall apply. 2) Since SUBTT16324 is within the High Fire Hazard Area, some of the street tree species and spacing that were approved in 2005 have been • discontinued and revised in 2010. a) Revision to City Drawing No. 2072 shall be required to reflect the revised street trees and its spacing, installation of curbside drain • outlets, and any relocation of drive approaches. b) Plan check/processing fee will be determined at the time of plan check submittal. 3) Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and • Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is B-50 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.11-54 DRC2011-00070 — MERITAGE HOMES October 26, 2011 Page 4 provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the • Engineering Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. Building and Safety Department 1) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard-lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 2) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines, and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines, the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 3) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, a Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building and Safety Services Director or his designee. 4) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall provide to the Building and Safety Services Director (or his designee) a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for • Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review for each lot prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded for each lot prior to issuance of a grading permit. 5) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 6) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Services Director and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Environmental Mitigation 1) All mitigation measures previously adopted with the Environmental Impact Report for recorded Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16324 and DRC2003-00753, DRC2003-00749, DRC2003-00750, and DRC2003-00751 shall be implemented. • B-51 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.11-54 DRC2011-00070— MERITAGE HOMES October 26, 2011 Page 5 • 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of October 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: • NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • B-52 • ea* COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2011-00070 SUBJECT: THE DESIGN REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR 81 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES APPLICANT: MR. PETER VANEK - MERITAGE HOMES LOCATION: AT THE NORTHERLY END OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: e. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers,or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 11-54, Standard / /_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits 1. Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved _/_/_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/ /_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code • regulations, and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. B-53 Project No. DRC2011-00070 • Completion Date 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions /_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and /_/_ • State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all / /_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided,all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/_/_ all receptacles shielded from public view. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the / /_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, /_/_ including proper illumination. • 10. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed _/_/_ control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 11. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles,such as veterinarians _/ /_ or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 12. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5%at the downstream end of a trail for a distance /_/_ of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official 13. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local / /_ Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 14. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District,at least one _/ /_ • model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing. 15. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, _/_/_ construct minimum 6 foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split- face double sided block, 'slump stone'or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. • 2 B-54 Project No. DRC2011-00070 Completion Date 16. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions(CC&Rs)shall not prohibit the keeping the equine / /_ animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot • owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 17. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / /_ owner, homeowners'association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 18. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling _/_/_ unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 19. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 20. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall _/ /_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 21. Construct block walls between homes(i.e.,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/_ • wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 22. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/ /_ gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 23. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. _/ /_ 24. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each / /_ support post for all wood fences,with a minimum of two'/:-inch lag bolts,to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 25. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. / /_ 26. Slope fencing along side property lines shall be wrought iron consistent with the Etiwanda North _/_/_ Specific Plan to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 27. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The /_/_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 28. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured / /_ products. • 3 B-55 Project No. DRC2011-00070 Completion Date D. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and /_/_ • for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. • 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, /_/_ detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building • plans. 4. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the /_/_ street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the-building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. • E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts / /_ • a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth / /_ from back of sidewalk. 3. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. / / 4. On flag lots, use a 12-foot driveway within flag to maximize landscape area. _/_/_ 5. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and / /_ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. F. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in /_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in _/_/_ • 4 13-56 Project No. DRC2011-D0070 Completion Date accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be • shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 /_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater /_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq.ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously /_/_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 6. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development _/ /_ Code and Etiwanda North Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls,landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in /_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and • coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which maybe required by the Engineering Services Department. 8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. • 9. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the _/ /_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 10. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and _/_/_ approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock _/_/_ Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. • 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special /_/_ Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. H. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location / /_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the • overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance • of building permits. 5 B-57 Project No. DRC2011-00070 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: / /_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2011-00070) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. • 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to / /_ • the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / /_ 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. J. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2011-00070). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include,but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project, the applicant shall pay _/_/_ development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan • Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. 6 B-58 Project No. DRC2011-00070 Completion Date Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. • 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map / /_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday /_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. K. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. / /_ 4. Construction of the homes must be in accordance with the approved Fuel Modification Zone Plan / /_ and the Addendum; this tract is located in the VHFHSZ. • 5. The structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler in accordance with the approved /_/_ Fuel Modification Zone Plan and the Addendum. L. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. • 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / /_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, / /_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. In hillside areas, residential developments shall be graded and constructed consistent with the /_/_ standards contained in the Hillside Development Regulations Section 17.24.070. 6. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for /_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Street Improvements 1. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees,street lights, and intersection safety lights / /_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil • Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City 7 B-59 Project No, DRC2011-00070 Completion Date Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/ /_ • construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing,street name signing, traffic signal conduit,and _/ /_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction /_/_ project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/ / adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan / /_ check. 2. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in /_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program. • N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting /_/_ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the /_/_ developer until accepted by the City. 0. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / /_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the /_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. • 8 B-60 • Project No. DRC2011-00070 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION LANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING NDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • 9 B-61 • ,� City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2011-00070 ($ Building & Safety Department Illy10500 Civic Center Dr. cj Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • 3�i T. (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 GRADING COMMITTEE PROJECT REPORT& RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: DRC2011-00070 Type: Tract 16324 Precise Grading Location: North of Wardman Bullock Road Planning Department: CANDYCE BURNETT APN: Meeting Date: August 2, 2011 By: Matthew Addington Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx No: If NO, see COMMENTS below: PRELIMINARY: GRC: August 2, 2011 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: PC Meeting: By: Note: Building and Safety— Grading will review and comment on future submittals for this project. A) STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. • 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3) A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6) The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a • grading permit. C:\WINDOWS\Temp\OLK3B4\DRC2011-00070 Grading Committee Project Report 20110802(4).doc 1 of 4 862 . City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2011-00070 L YtS Building & Safety Department a 10500 Civic Center Dr. p 1 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 �M T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 9) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 10) The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 13) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest • adopted California Plumbing Code. • 14) The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 15) The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16) The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 17) This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. • 18) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 19) Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the • Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and C:\WINDOWS\Temp\OLK3B4\DRC2011-00070 Grading Committee Project Report 20110802(4).doc 2of4 8-63 ,� City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2011-00070 =^.t Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. •' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 i1y4 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 20) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. B) COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: 1) Please note that at this conceptual level a review of the accessibility access is not performed. It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. 2) Please provide the earthwork quantities on the title sheet of the conceptual grading and drainage plan. • 3) All driveways over 10% gradient require the approval of the Planning Services Department. C:\WINDOWS\Temp\OLK3B4\DRC2011-00070 Grading Committee Project Report 20110802(4).doc 3 of 4 -64 xr- City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2011-00070 . xL IL Building & Safety Department Sr W 10500 Civic Center Dr. mk, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 �� T. T. 477-2710 F. (909) 477-2711 • C) SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 2) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 3) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building and Safety Services Director or his designee. 4) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director (or his designee) a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review for each lot prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded for each lot prior to issuance of a grading permit. 5) Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). • D) WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. • • C:\WINDOWS\Temp\OLK3B4\DRC2011-00070 Grading Committee Project Report 20110802(4).doc 4 of 4 6:65 ;,corn, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection • `"` sr ' District is FIRE ------ Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS June 29, 2011 Meritage Homes Whispering Ranch Tract 16324 DRC2011-00070 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply The design for Fire Hydrant spacing and location shall comply with the RCFPD Standard 5-10 and CVWD's current standard. FSC-2 Fire Flow I. The required fire flow for this project is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix B, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. • 3. Public Water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits for the construction of the homes will not be issued until the public water plans are approved by FCS and CVWD. 4. On the site plans to be submitted for plan check, show all fire hydrants available to the . proposed site. FSC-3 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems The 2010 California Residential Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in the dwelling units in accordance with the 2010 edition of NFPA 13D. FSC-4 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads; streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access — Fire Lanes Standard 5-1. 1. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-3. 2. Fire lanes on public streets do not need to be identified. 3. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. . FSC-5 Hazardous Fire Area • This project is located within the "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho •Cucamonga "Hillside District", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as High Probability-High Consequence for Fire Risk. B-66 These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District. The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • FCS-6 Fuel Modification Zone Plan: The applicant shall design the architectural and landscape plans for the for the development of the lots in accordance with the approved Fuel Modification Zone Plan and Addendum that were prepared for the community. '1. • FCS-7 Mobile, stationary or portable power-operated equipment in the Hazardous Fire Area shall not be used without the Fire Safety Division's written approval. Specific fire protection measures that may be required to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to: a. A stand-by water tender, equipped with a pump, fire hose and nozzle. b. Pre-wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks. c. Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day. d. For welding, cutting or grinding work, clear away all combustible material from the area around such operation for a minimum distance of 10-feet. A "hot-work" permit must be obtained from Fire Construction Services prior to cutting, welding or grinding work. e. Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one five (5) gallon backpack water pump-type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation. FCS-8 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, Fire Protection Plan requirements shall be installed, inspected and accepted by the Fire District staff. Schedule the inspection with Fire Construction Services at 909-477-2713. FSC-9 Alternate Method Application • Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-10 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that regulate parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. FCS-11 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be noncombustible internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness with non combustible fixtures. The numbers shall be visible from the street. FCS-12 Landscaping: The lots must landscaped with the required vegetation in accordance with approved landscape plans. • FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits 2 B-67 SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 26, 2011 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS.+ DEC/mss- 607° t ii,a, SPtJa411