Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011/11/09 - Agenda Packetp • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION Lim AGENDA RANO CUUCAMONGA NOVEMBER 9, 2011 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California L CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Munoz_ Vice Chairman Howdyshell _ Fletcher_ Wimberly _ Oaxaca _ • I. . II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • I October 26, 2011 Regular Meeting Minutes IIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS .) The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT-A proposal to subdivide five (5)vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) -APNs: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Variance 2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. B. VARIANCE DRC2009-00020- CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - A request to allow perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the • 1 of 5 i PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA L J �.� NOVEMBER 9, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA maximum wall height permitted in residential districts,for noise attenuation purposes along the perimeter of a proposed 76-lot subdivision with a combined area of about 53 acres in the Very Low(VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) -APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. C. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2009-00224 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT-A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) -APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Variance DRC2009-00020. D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(NON-CONSTRUCTION) DRC2011-00990 • - BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS - A request to modify Conditional Use Permits DRC2007-00258 and DRC2007-00258U to increase the hours of operation Monday through Wednesday and on Sundays for a sit-down restaurant located at 12375 Base Line Road, Suite 101, in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Planned Community at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-161-58. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the permitting of existing structures. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED E. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00671 - K. HOVNANIAN - RANCHO 79 -A request to add a 5th floor plan, re-plot 9 parcels, add a loggia option to the Plan 1 floor plan and make revisions to the Plan 2 floor plan of the previously approved Development Review DRC2010-00259 for 79 single- family lots on 34.1 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, west of the Southern California Edison Corridor-APN: 1087-101-01 thru-55, 1087-111-01 thru-02, 1087-111-14 thru 1087-111-19, 1087-111-21, and 1087-111-27 thru 1087-111-36. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226-1. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #88082915 and #98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001) and does not • 2 of 5 p • iirrss. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA S NOVEMBER 9, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. IV. NEW BUSINESS F. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00560-AMERICAN TIRE DEPOT- BEDROS DARKJIAN - A request to construct a 7,885 square foot tire sales and service building on a 1.38 acre parcel within the Victoria Commons Retail Center within the General Commercial District at 11951 Foothill Boulevard -APN: 0229-023-01. On January 24, 2007 a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. • 1 ••• ; V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS I G. DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE STATUS REPORT AND REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS I This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. I ;: VII.. COMMISSION,BUSINESS/COMMENTS :... I VIII. ADJOURNMENT • I The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. • 3 of 5 1111 ' ''t' PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA e S� NOVEMBER 97 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Lois L Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 3, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. ..-‘2 5,::-94---t.--er-c..----____ If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all • persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items. • 4 of 5 p S itt PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA LS NOVEMBER 9, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA • AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a • fee of$2,216 for maps and $2,328 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and electronic devices while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us • • 5 of 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting October 26, 2011 Vice Chairman Howdyshell called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:20 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California: ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Frances Howdyshell, Francisco Oaxaca, Ray Wimberly ABSENT: Lou Munoz STAFF PRESENT: Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary * * * * * ANNOUNCEMENTS • None APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Oaxaca, 4-0-1 (Munoz absent)to approve the minutes of October 12, 2011. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2011-00852-PETER A. WRIGHT-A request to establish an Entertainment Permit to allow for karaoke within an existing Bar (Type 48 ABC License), located at 8108 San Bernardino Road. APN: 0207-111-11-0000. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project • qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing • Facilities) because the project entails the minor operational changes to an existing bar, and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. • Vice Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, she closed the public hearing. • Commissioner Fletcher said that it appears to be a routine request and perhaps this is just a housekeeping request to keep the business up to date with our current regulations. He said there is no indication of apparent problems, and he had no problem with adding Karaoke. Commissioner Wimberly concurred and said the addition of Karaoke is allowing them to continue business as usual, and he had no problem with the request. • Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she appreciated the thorough report. She said she was glad to see the food offerings and the photos of the business. She noted there are no bad incident reports,they have had a good track record over the years and adding the entertainment to their business is a great thing. Motion: Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2011-00852. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: MUNOZ - carried R f f f W B. DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00070-MERITAGE HOMES-The architectural design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the build out of 81 single-family lots on approximately 43.3 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per • acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the northerly end of Wardman-Bullock Road - APN: 1087-201-01 thru 07, 1087-201-13 thru 40, 1087-191-01 thrul5, 0226-792-15, 0226-792-20 thru 24, 0226-792-29 thru 38, 0226-782-01 thru 11, and 0226-782-12 thru 15. Related File: Tract 16324. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 (State Clearinghouse No. 2003111057), and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. Vice Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Stephanie Carter, Meritage homes, 1250 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 250, Corona,thanked staff for getting them through the process quickly and efficiently. • Vice Chairman Howdyshell complimented Meritage Homes for working towards completing this project; the existing neighborhood will be pleased because the property has been barren for some time. She said the single-story plan is wonderful. Vice Chairman Howdyshell closed the public hearing. • Commissioner Fletcher said that with respect to the size of the homes; he said he thinks the homes are still quite substantial in size. He said the slightly smaller home product also allows for more room on the lot. He said it is a nice product for the community. • Planning Commission Minutes -2- October 26, 2011 Commissioner Wimberly said he worked with Meritage at DRC. He thanked them for making the • requested changes and he looks forward to the project to be in place. Commissioner Oaxaca added that the adjacent residents will be happy to see this completed and he was glad to see that the new product has incorporated consistent design features that will blend with the existing homes and the neighbors will appreciate that. Vice Chairman Howdyshell agreed and said that they looked at the architectural design of the existing homes and did a good job integrating the new homes with the existing neighborhood. Motion: Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Development Design Review DRC2011-00070. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: MUNOZ - carried PUBLIC COMMENTS None COMMISSION BUSINESS AND COMMENTS • None f M 1 X 4 ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Wimberly, carried 4-0-1 (Munoz absent),to adjourn. The Planning Commission adjourned at 7:33 p.m. Respectfully submitted, James R. Troyer, AICP Secretary Approved: • Planning Commission Minutes -3- October 26, 2011 . f, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting October 26, 2011 Vice Chairman Howdyshell called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:20 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Frances Howdyshell, Francisco Oaxaca, Ray Wimberly ABSENT: Lou Munoz STAFF PRESENT: Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary ANNOUNCEMENTS • None * * * * * APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Oaxaca, 4-0-1 (Munoz absent)to approve the minutes of October 12, 2011. f f fF k k • PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2011-00852-PETER A.WRIGHT-A request to establish an Entertainment Permit to allow for karaoke within an existing Bar (Type 48 ABC License), located at 8108 San Bernardino Road. APN: 0207-111-11-0000. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project • qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) because the project entails the minor operational changes to an existing bar, and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. • 4 . Vice Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, she closed the public hearing. • Commissioner Fletcher said that it appears to be a routine request and perhaps this is just a housekeeping request to keep the business up to date with our current regulations. He said there is no indication of apparent problems, and he had no problem with adding Karaoke. Commissioner Wimberly concurred and said the addition of Karaoke is allowing them to continue business as usual, and he had no problem with the request. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she appreciated the thorough report. She said she was glad to see the food offerings and the photos of the business. She noted there are no bad incident reports,they have had a good track record over the years and adding the entertainment to their business is a great thing. Motion: Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2011-00852. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: MUNOZ - carried B. DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00070-MERITAGE HOMES-The architectural design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the build out of 81 single-family lots on approximately 43.3 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per • acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the northerly end of Wardman-Bullock Road -APN: 1087-201-01 thru 07, 1087-201-13 thru 40, 1087-191-01 thrul5, 0226-792-15, 0226-792-20 thru 24, 0226-792-29 thru 38, 0226-782-01 thru 11, and 0226-782-12 thru 15. Related File: Tract 16324. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 (State Clearinghouse No. 2003111057), and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. Vice Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Stephanie Carter, Meritage homes, 1250 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 250, Corona,thanked staff for P 9 � , getting them through the process quickly and efficiently. Vice Chairman Howdyshell complimented Meritage Homes for working towards completing this project; the existing neighborhood will be pleased because the property has been barren for some time. She said the single-story plan is wonderful. Vice Chairman Howdyshell closed the public hearing. Commissioner Fletcher said that with respect to the size of the homes; he said he thinks the homes are still quite substantial in size. He said the slightly smaller home product also allows for more room on the lot. He said it is a nice product for the community. • Planning Commission Minutes -2- October 26, 2011 Commissioner Wimberly said he worked with Meritage at DRC. He thanked them for making the • requested changes and he looks forward to the project to be in place. Commissioner Oaxaca added that the adjacent residents will be happy to see this completed and he was glad to see that the new product has incorporated consistent design features that will blend with the existing homes and the neighbors will appreciate that. Vice Chairman Howdyshell agreed and said that they looked at the architectural design of the existing homes and did a good job integrating the new homes with the existing neighborhood. Motion: Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Development Design Review DRC2011-00070. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: MUNOZ - carried PUBLIC COMMENTS None COMMISSION BUSINESS AND COMMENTS • None ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Wimberly, carried 4-0-1 (Munoz absent),to adjourn. The Planning Commission adjourned at 7:33 p.m. Respectfully submitted, James R. Troyer, AICP Secretary Approved: • Planning Commission Minutes -3- October 26, 2011 • STAFF REPORT oat PLANNING DEPARTMENT Li a Date: November 9, 2011 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - A proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Variance 2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VARIANCE DRC2009-00020 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - A request to allow perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the maximum wall height permitted in • residential districts, for noise attenuation purposes along the perimeter of a proposed 76-lot subdivision with a combined area of about 53 acres in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. • TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2009-00224 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT: A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Variance DRC2009-00020. BACKGROUND: The applications were scheduled for review and action at the Planning Commission meeting to be conducted on May 25, 2011. However, during the week preceding the public hearing staff and the applicant received correspondence from various agencies (Exhibits L — 0) regarding the Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) that was circulated per the notification and comment requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). These agencies concluded that more information was required and requested more documentation and/or data that would support the City's environmental determination. The public hearing was subsequently continued to the Planning Commission meeting on July 13, 2011. • Items A, B, & C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTf18122, DRC2009-00020,AND DRC2009-00224—CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 2 • review. Using these documents, staff revised the Initial Study to include additional data and revised the Mitigated Negative Declaration to include new mitigations. The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative • Declaration were re-circulated as required per CEQA guidelines. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: • North - Single-Family Residences (Part) and Grading/Construction of New Single-Family Residences (Part, Tract 17651); Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Access road for San Bernardino Flood Control District and Foothill Freeway (SR-210) East - Vacant; Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan West - Single-Family Residences (Part) and Vacant (Part); Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - n/a East - Very Low Residential West - Very Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The project area consists of five (5) parcels with a combined area of • approximately 2,350,000 square feet- (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 940 feet (north to south) (Exhibit B). The site is vacant. There are numerous trees within and along the property lines of the. individual parcels that comprise the project site. The eastern half of the combined property is mostly low vegetation. To the north of the western half of the project site, there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site, there is ongoing grading and construction of new homes (Related file: Tract 17651). To the west, are additional single-family residences and a single vacant parcel. To the south, is a road used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this road, is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). To the east, are vacant parcels. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (Exhibit C). The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,455 feet and 1,400 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 76 lots for single-family residential development (Exhibit D). Development/construction of the homes following the subdivision of the property will be by others, as it is not the intent of the applicant to do so themselves. All of the lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas will range between 21,780 square feet to 36,890 square feet, which are in excess of the minimum of 20,000 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 25,230 square feet which is in excess of the minimum 25,000 that is required. The depth of each lot will be at least 200 feet, and the width of each lot will meet the • required 90-foot dimension. All of the lots will be conventional, i.e. rectangular in shape, which will allow conventional house plotting. Included in the proposal are several streets, including one that A,B,&C- 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122, DRC2009-00020,AND DRC2009-00224—CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page3 will link East Avenue and adjacent future residential development at Tract 17651 to the north and the vacant parcel to the east. • As the subject property is located within the Equestrian Overlay, each lot will have a dedicated corral area of 24 feet by 24 feet for horse-keeping, and equestrian trails will be provided along the rear of each lot per Section 5.25.500 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Along the north perimeter of the project site, a 20-foot wide Community Trail will be constructed per Figure 5-18 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. From East Avenue to a point approximately 1,200 feet to the east, at the north side of Lots 47, 58, 59, 70, and 71, the alignment of the trail will be located entirely within the proposed subdivision. From that point to the northeast corner of the subject site, the alignment of the trail shifts northward, and only 8 feet of the required 20 feet width of the trail, at the north side of Lots 22, 23, 34, 35, and 46, will be within the proposed subdivision. The other 12 feet will be on the neighboring property to the north (Tract 17651). B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Etiwanda High School at 9161 Base Line Road on October 16, 2009 (Exhibit J). Several individuals from the surrounding community attended. None of them had any specific objections to the project. Most of the comments were related to off-site improvements as a result of the project including street widening, installation of utilities (natural gas and sewer), undergrounding of existing power lines, removal of trees, and construction of new walls (including the noise attenuation wall). The applicant answered these questions to the satisfaction of those present. Some of their • questions could not be answered because the subject of the inquiry, such as obtaining a connection to a natural gas line, could only be addressed by the applicable utility. There were concerns about impacts related to construction activity including fugitive dust and noise. Staff stated to the attendees that the applicant's proposal does not include house product, therefore, grading would be limited to rough grading, and there would not be any construction activity associated with this application. Nevertheless, there are mitigation measures that must be followed by developers to control dust and noise. Measures to control dust will include the use of a water truck to stabilize soil and prevent it from becoming airborne, ceasing construction during strong • winds, and a variety of barriers to prevent water runoff. The principal means to control noise will be to limit the hours of construction. Staff also noted to the attendees that in the event such measures were not being followed, they could contact the City (or other agencies like the Air Quality Management District) to investigate the problem and, if there is a violation, require the applicant to correct the violation. C. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee (Addington and Miller) and Technical Review Committee reviewed the application on December 15, 2009. The Committees accepted the proposal and recommends approval, Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. D. Design Review Committees: The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Nicholson) reviewed the application on December 15, 2009 (Exhibit H). The Committee reviewed the • proposed subdivision and accepted it as submitted after concluding that the design/layout of the tract is standard for the zoning district and area of the project site. The height of the noise attenuating walls was identified as standard for residential projects along the Foothill Freeway • (SR-210). Staff indicated that the design and construction of the wall would be per Caltrans standard. The Committee noted that the house product would be reviewed later when the developer of the site submitted the plans and that the opportunity for additional comments would A,B,&C- 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122, DRC2009-00020,AND DRC2009-00224—CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 4 • • • • occur at that time The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. E. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the application on December 9, 2009 (Exhibit I). In general, the Committee reviewed the proposed subdivision and accepted it as submitted with several relatively minor revisions including enlarging the corner cut-offs at trail intersections, providing block walls along the perimeter of trails throughout the subdivision (instead of PVC fencing), and providing safety/identification signs and striping, The Committee also requested that staff research two (2) significant revisions relating to the proposed 20-foot wide Community Trail. The first was the possibility of allowing horse-keeping related vehicles access to, the trail, i.e. drive on it, to facilitate the movement of such horse-keeping related vehicles in a forward-facing direction through the trail system. The second was the planting of the replacement Eucalyptus windrow in order to enhance the aesthetics along the trail on the north side of the proposed north perimeter wall of the subdivision that will be located adjacent and parallel to the trail. Staff discussed the requests with the Engineering and Public Works Departments, and it was determined that neither request could be accommodated. The first request could not be granted as a) there was a potential for safety to be compromised because of motorized horse-keeping.related vehicles sharing the same path of travel as pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian traffic, b) the surface of the trail was not designed to support such traffic and would be subject to damage, and c) motorized horse-keeping related vehicles are not permitted on the Community Trail system • anywhere else in the City. The second request could not be granted as long-term maintenance including tree pruning and watering would become the sole responsibility of the City. At a follow-up • meeting with the Committee on September 8, 2010, alternate solutions were discussed. The Committee agreed to the two following solutions: 1) to address the first request, hammerhead turnarounds would be provided at the north ends of each north to south segment of Local Trails that intersect with the Community Trail to permit horse-keeping related vehicles to reverse direction (these will match the turnarounds near the east and west termini of the east to west trail along the south perimeter of the subdivision), and 2) to address the second request, the Eucalyptus windrow would be planted adjacent and parallel to the Local Trail and wall that will be located along the south perimeter of the subdivision. At this meeting, there was additional discussion regarding the wall along the rear of each property and its design. The applicant and the Committee agreed that the wall would be comprised of a solid lower portion constructed of decorative blocks and an open upper portion constructed of wrought iron fencing. These solutions and the Committee's other conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. F. Variance DRC2009-00020: The applicant submitted a Variance to allow the construction of noise . attenuating walls along the south, east, and west perimeters of the proposed subdivision that will- be in excess of 6 feet in height (Exhibit F). Noise attenuation walls were identified as the principal means for mitigating noise impacts generated by traffic on East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210), according to the noise study prepared by Mestre Greves Associates on October 9, 2008. Per Section 17.08.060(K) of the Development Code, the maximum height of walls permitted in residential districts is 6 feet. The proposed walls will be approximately 6 to 15.5 feet above the pad elevations of the lots adjoining the walls as seen from the interior of the subdivision. Depending on the location, some walls will be constructed over retaining walls, i.e. a combination wall. Therefore, • as seen from the outside, the height of the walls will be greater. The general area where the walls will be highest is near the southeast corner of the subdivision at Lot 16 where the wall, as seen from the freeway, will be approximately 22 feet high. A,B,&C- 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122, DRC2009-00020,AND DRC2009-00224—CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 5 Facts for Findings: The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of ' development standards. In order to grant a request for a Variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings. Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property. The following are facts to support the necessary findings: 1. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code. Fact/s: The proposed walls are for noise attenuation purposes to reduce the exterior noise levels at the lots along the perimeter of the proposed subdivision. The height of the walls is necessary to mitigate the noise impacts to a level that is less than 65 dBA CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) as specified in the Development Code. If the walls were limited to 6 feet as specified in the Code, or if the walls were absent altogether, the exterior noise levels would not comply with the Code, nor be consistent with Public Health and Safety policies relating to noise (Goal PS-13 of the General Plan). There is no practical alternative to walls that will achieve the desired noise attenuation. 2. Finding : That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. • Fact/s: The project site is located approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) at the east side of East Avenue. As a result, it is exposed to noise generated by traffic that is generally not present near other residential properties in the City which are screened by existing development and/or sufficiently distant from these principal noise sources that noise impacts are negligible. 3. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Fact/s: The purpose of the walls is to attenuate traffic noise. The exterior noise levels generated by traffic exceed the maximum limits established by the Development Code and would negatively affect a future homeowner's ability to enjoy and use the outdoor areas of his property in the absence of these walls. Furthermore, the effectiveness of noise attenuating materials used in the construction of the homes • is augmented by the presence of the noise attenuating perimeter wall. The absence of the wall would reduce the effectiveness of noise mitigation measures and expose the occupants of the homes to elevated interior noise. 4. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact/s: The Foothill Freeway (SR-210) corridor within the City is adjacent to numerous • residential properties. Traffic noise impacts along the corridor must be mitigated to levels as described in the Development Code and consistent with the General Plan. The freeway corridor abuts various residential zoning districts including the A,B,&C- 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122, DRC2009-00020,AND DRC2009-00224—CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 6 • • Very Low (VL) Residential District. Walls of this height or similar are common along the freeway corridor for noise attenuation purposes where residential • properties are adjacent to the freeway. 5. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Facts: The height of the walls as seen from East Avenue, will be 6 feet and will not be adjacent to any private property. In addition to appearing to have the typical height of a perimeter wall, the wall along with associated landscaping will be constructed per the decorative design shown in Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The height of the wall as seen from the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) will be similar to the height of other noise attenuation walls along the freeway corridor within the City. This wall will be constructed per the decorative design established by Caltrans. The properties adjacent to the wall along the east perimeter of the proposed subdivision are vacant. This wall will be constructed of decorative block • per the City's Design Guidelines. Upon development of the properties to the east of Lots 17 to 22, any residential structures, in compliance with the minimum rear yard setback standard, will be at least 60 feet from the wall. The lot immediately to the east of Lot 16 will likely have a matching pad elevation when it is developed to match the proposed subdivision (for grading, street alignment, and drainage purposes). Therefore, the retaining portion of the wall (approximately 7.5 feet in height) as seen from this lot would be buried, reducing the visible height of the wall. • J G. Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224: The existing trees throughout the site will be removed as necessary, and a replacement Eucalyptus tree windrow will be planted with a spacing of 8 feet on center per Section 5.41.501 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant has submitted a Tree •Removal Permit for the removal of these trees. A set of replacement Eucalyptus windrows will be planted along the entire south perimeter and part of the east perimeter of the subdivision (Exhibit G). Originally, the windrow was to be installed along the north perimeter of the subdivision but was relocated to address the revisions requested by the Trails Advisory Committee, as noted above. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and 'the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to biological resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, and air quality, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, Staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. During this comment period Staff and the applicant received correspondence from various agencies such as the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD), Department of Fish and Game (DFG), California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the Army Corp of Engineers. These agencies concluded that more information was required and requested more documentation and/or data that would support the City's environmental determination. The applicant and his consultant updated their environmental documents and analyses and submitted them to the City for review. Using these documents staff • revised the Initial Study to include additional data relating to, and discussing, greenhouse gas emissions, air quality associated health risks, biological habitat, and jurisdictional waters. Similarly, A,B,&C- 6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122, DRC2009-00020,AND DRC2009-00224—CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 7 the Mitigated Negative Declaration was revised to include new mitigations. The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration were re-circulated as required per CEQA guidelines. The draft Resolutions of Approval were revised accordingly. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No additional correspondence has been received other than the above-noted agency requests for more information related to the environmental documents. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, Variance DRC2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 by the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Respectfully submitted, intba, Jam e. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:MS/ge • Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Conceptual Master Plan/Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 Exhibit E - Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit F - Preliminary Wall and Fence Plan Exhibit G - Preliminary Tree Removal and Windrow Replacement Plan Exhibit H - Design Review Committee Action Comments (December 15, 2009) Exhibit I - Trails Advisory Committee Action Comments (December 9, 2009 and December 8, 2010) Exhibit J - Neighborhood Meeting Summary (prepared by the Applicant) Exhibit K - Planning Commission Staff Report (excerpt) (May 25, 2011) Exhibit L - Correspondence from South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Exhibit M - Correspondence from California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Exhibit N - Correspondence from California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) Exhibit 0 - Correspondence from United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACOE) Exhibit P - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2009-00020 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 • A,B,&C- 7 • . r . eat ,,,P.s. / • 1i-•8,- i • ' . • . _ 1 % I_.5,5(555544 I! • 5 • ,... (57 * NO455,4055' 21r"',.. •• L' ' a L' ; • I, # SeNiNfrs.55 s 4 I I - * .6'. ‘1 g ; 0• "sEn=r°i!i' rir „r4"..- ic ss• v b• • ' 4;i4"44171,1 5 „„j„,4447 ' •• g ii ' ere • '2; t. .- ! c 7 '7-• - `• TIT., • 811 c'' , l• i § 8 gi. g", ...E'• L 1 g§ P 7?•- I..:, "4.4548,4 rt•-• , PROJECT SITE 1 „...- ,.., I . a ,,te • , unstunisrs '4; ' 4 N., ee •e ... • E W5455454 e• C"'''''6; r ,.."•.2/i . \ -, • • g7.11.-97'.149•51 ' 4-Lii. .ntlItn.!■`_''.5: EC-747 r criti.li g..,-9.:_,L ,r ,..„. , If 44t.,flo ;el • 16 /.050,045. i• r rEE -- E +,,- ,, _,w•:_sg_ ..,,, ,.,..........w• •• 8- In, e4 e 11 1 •fluent:se: ei-- al•14445**. es--„., :2 ce'5'.• 40444.555_45,..6,14.-4.541.•4* 1:1 II ,§n41, 9i • • • l'!Tht.F-. rr , ; ,! istemisHoRSE Pi 4 .1 nIW Nate REFS PARK 4", ' rA•142,545c, 7 `7"r"Pr-.Bi fir/gl . .,.. - ,. -.,..•.._. p-a- . LOS DSOS 771411PPYTNCI 1,1N',1,07.; .: r, IKENTLICODEPPO , 1: ?54%. r,ff t SUM r ,,,,, c * 0ANYAN.ST 4%1 15.N, __ 1**ISKuton pi I 41, la 1'601)741SL_ _. ..5 _ _ . _ INTE EllIATE :-.ak Ipl:',.1 Irrit....7.,:•P',44"1.5. ' tumor* •14■14N;;S4.„sn, , C I•45 i1L ' ••• 4' i. ',I iP i■eli ■ ,I .,......11,111.a tT l'i-'-''' ri'-Sr I, ‘ 4.. :,: kcal-EP, g.'. pm. :1 i . t•...--'1, ;Pffr; il____ :1101:11: w: Cliftg.CS c 'E sr - a • Z 5 l'' ?: 044, 81:888.8,'I 158% Gukre Da • 'It !TI...-i4;-:.in'5§b,7.: 7-g"8"" I!teen 41-•.e' 11 ej ti. '‘, C-1 6, .... '45 '; s --5 . ; > ' • 'err , ' •N '5,.. *- 4,-.- , .5 ,g_ -, e A '4,117 58,0 ..4,4?-7-2. —?V°. 1 Pn.retca >4 ----•F. ;es . --.,- c-- --b,: ,.,4.n.., _..77.;,;Tcc;,. -, udilai"ii .,-.. ti rrN /MOE 1n5 l'. 45445_51 i "1 ' i• ' ...S.55554 IND" ' „,,,,ii--71e ”Thinr WI-PI" 41 It '• ,,,,.,,_ 4.444,4c1,5, 1--"ril'IM PIOT.- trimaw VOW . „, .---,___ 1 HIGHLAND A44 , , litRUINS4 • ,FiSsEli PI •75-2, % - 1, . 0 7%. 1 -4/11' V "9— c1-4:--77.,• 1; ci-.,no!'r1LIUM -. WifillSTONE OR 454o., se a 4 '5424% ?e4). 1 • c.e,4. 4„....; .4 ....goo,1 , ,0007005p5 .,,„, ' i] en' ”8-‘11,1, i I1 ''t C11:! .itH"' :r ';': 4g'fr •lsrm■is= .k8 u„„ IC 5 Si* IiI .E. m, --1.je „„.„‘7.-giscic.44744free.sc-e-- OCT 6 L- „ s... 4.5setents satires a;•• 1 Ttuasstssos.4. .e. . I I...--'""NW,"n •!. '. . 1 i; kEi V bi f.: .1. II ZWAPLAPI. 1.14,..rn, r.,., -4„ :,.4,,IL ,i.1 b,,,....,..,„,wo , tit, , ,,i-r.. —4- —ji......i.e.r ...,..-„,94N4.,41 .T.,,Ilus ,....;-..,7„.„, . ."...,,,,...,!-.,i-4i 1455/5. 4r$1 !'... '-' -•51. i !‘„,50.54*- . • . . 444 Ts 51 ze- 544,4 :14554.„A. ,. ,,,,,,,,. ie, farilkn CI: KHASI, . ‘1. • RANCHO * 5.5 ., 5, 41 4, - ;..i., --±! e": 47,454: '• cli'' ,4 12.!,.,..„,, .1 CUCAMONGA1i '4-.'at.i.RO.til '°'?....Ln--- i • 5444-.. ETIWANDA • t • - t.. ---Tru"-1,-- , WINDROWS A trrr"Jr .1 Fut...Oct CCI' 1.052425-1 4. •• -c,' FoR515141Dril"4 Fc,i I ARIERAST ; ..< l' Nfl',',A 1• a gil b , : v4=-, , 6 , : 1 A,-,,racifiroor 1/41,, ,I;vinigti .i5:i .. A,. 4-,. tr. y. 1, , , 'c ; r"ci;t:.`17,-. '...,- ... L Fc;../.7-;-trit' ---•- - r i r ETIWANDA ! ?-e.,^°.* rmuc ''. e"riil• '-'r i 881.1,8'I/ '8895 . g",,,,,,• 4; 7'''''et. „„„ & . „'e 411 lc kg. P lc.'.P. . unzurr FT! i !: Mn WI ' :,nii. Pr tn: & , '.: 5 ;,, . A7.., 1,, i, i c ..,,,..,5 ,,, -;,--71.4 rc. , :.,;,-,:' .4 t ....1..„_SCOly.IrE e° ' -, ' 'I1 ,s i ,.. •,. „ k ' ""rt.te5.t§ 4 fr I r rri 4,!-.IIg.,- ....T.. 'a. i IL"- , , ........ ,,i. c , F. ;1 In,r J1.17,7" I starlI!.`IN.rarr IN I I ii ni 'in 1.1.;11.I-IR4TE .1.- I r.-T rcr 0.•ELENA 5rjr,„,„E:I Li,0, ... ., ' 2111Ittral.It - 4 1;-1 1555a- -- - '4" - 1.4.4.G.• ; 'ty GRAPELAND •,... ,55000-44, 4; ;PAReleits„ N Liii011 1 irseaniffi •'14-7 ..• ,'r„,,,p4R1 44444" '.4.11 1 •• I ini5511"n, 1. ?? 4>.' '''i ;kit!• i /,,,,, l• A 55' . . 4,5a-'s/Ise Ds 5 3. ; CRITEM1 . .)-,r WO TIAMCI 01's Ei .. ..F.i01 ...„.. / gproaTisc num , •;'55t.5S.V. 0 .4' i 1,:„4 i--'1""u'ITI sfro,...,7 01; lerswan • 4• 4ea• c % /5/ . "...,2 BASE LINE BLVD . _...._______ UP:51 ..glg.._. 8. 440,44cFsr 55 5105.56P . r----1..---- e --r..s.„%z.:, r- Fri 44.117"q r-ii, :, i, . _,i.zurgigas i"s,9;ilc 844 40...r, I.: 1. i .‘''''.. e •• -f, / tc c., .... Im, , ,, ,moNIGOMERYDP ,1 MEE AINSEllnr,r,T. er . y CM,04,11F DR ,., 50,51 . . 4-5 454.455,4 154-•-5"---'1 •.1.1 ' It ' •• I. / ,RuTisocECT re, t .,5 N'., §:I § 81,-;7 ! ',14,7,. 1,*4495455-C. "inIROVPI. c':• e 14055• e '.',. 4 sosect, lIeutfrfiN r! *5, roman, 4ferly 555041;51 -• ' %44.45•51• •1 IrE5 r4C11* •'4"5, F1: • • . 4 •%-' - , - ..14,., 5 4,54.„., , . ,,al ,, 0, :. Lritrr,(LLer,c,a., Ito;te I * A ffq,40,*,,,',I 747,11 Njitiosi, ""MLM°M=11'55'5, ,' gl 5 „„„s,,s46,4 ..... . ... likereD4455 ;.• I, r- 'I ; ‘cw:-. 5 5 '----.•;.1/4S .0,.-.9f "er, .1 ' -14„ 15—.11 •! mate e . . - •• - I 1 'I _ Klear en 454r.,,...0 5&6: !7.4?-4!. .1 4.15• r.. _..g • ,c,. - ,t semn4tommirn , I C% 0„1"44,‘..40* I,ti.114.r.t1I ruakyo9Ost r:Pcg•4188§§18888r8 11 81.4.,,•5" 1r 1.k iriVIAMS(17 . . . Z .1' ,, ;:. ,. ■ 6...,:nih .....„41 ,I :4 :. ir8t-g--- ---7 --:---L---- ':§ 1`411 11 .7 ..41•57'm i ygg-r- .: ....-- .i:- % l.„,:,_! ; :g ....„ -e ■ ' 'bRialT§1 . . IsN,N4.s ter„ p / . 4.. sou* •';'N &--1-',,_.._Ct___...----- ?„6:-„He-co i.c.c-1,9 ,: . ,fflemlyps asasser ,m,RD l• CIATIM40/1445. Eft '. • -',182 E j :' miLLERAyt ; i! VICTORIA GARDENS .t, GUN 0 • 4. .4/ 4./55t • ,•41-•iseens% • 11 g 1 /01711WINST 2, csesesse teeetr; I ..§-5 45 6,,' " .1 s. ! 1.5.,.V i::., . rewr i 0.70,71■44414401}9, G .! -4149ie ' .. 11 •**554,5., 5 "e , ;Sam SI ,stmmu 0, I- f. ' ..... e •e i ..",47? ewers, 8"11. .§ ",,; 1Z04i. II i w - if °I•-4 ! MULLIS Pi 45 st ' '•• . -3., tRCOW4061; g .;;‘,1 cc,r;„„ 21144%.12411 4 h , .. . , . 4 r,y.,)- RA 35010uAtel 1 . • • 4.4.40 el015510WW4 . • MP SaaAnN". li - . 2 $ E■ HIS24114 • !I • I1P ' 1 4 FOOTHILL BLVD F OEM OU '''r: ? W 3W . i0, , AvE EXHIBIT i A 6 ae 8 E ,§ ; 1 Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 and �a. Variance DRC2009-00.020 n•is' !`er Ft' '1 sitt i''� . v iV I }k d\. !.v { t • v 1 r 1 I i r_r �yr� c af-,1Ats :t i S bf,frI t., ..,'Sll 1� jj{�a;.4 #�f�y .y iN+,i i It'z;t 4 f I . r R y,.. 'F4.xr C° ', Y ><t rt.. ..q.mi-4 d�4? ip-4. I '� t t d t.R $!V4 L YY 3 { i M 1/4 r .. y A I -vr IJ P t r, fl Lt. .4t,..,,,,;;',4: p :-. yl! d wry.10' a )' tl 1 1 1r ''-"t }rd - i /� r 'WO x r _'..a W-74.44...-.''t m,. 4: t ntt. .4tt} i.J r 0tv I^ a i.J. tit. Yve � (� ► t tt Yy n t t ' ; SQ l'. ° 1 l -41 �?aetei r 9: rn1' E F rj �..Yy' JM I ( 9 .....,...1.,:::,..{ t&:.;"....: s . ; i'k6 r��tk`y A 1 :1 t, "4q� `Yr 4-. 1 3 t t e .1s-r , E 14 r Ltj:S {vwyid .1::Y; t}._N{t t Y v ',,w.4 Y3' 'x�I,G, I .,''';',',.;';=.4"".1:t k",t,'ff " 11i tb i. v T i Y tt ie'.1'nav I i G I,s 1iJ, v / • a "1'',iv'f'o xr1.- t Z11g ( c t`t ' L-, a i z 1;43 1;,StJ IJ:.4- :•b IN k .r":-F �. ' 4rt 41".N ' 'r Sy. -4 to 4.V Y�j Y1i f ; r� v4' IJ , yv .s^.! r!t'1 fu_ } 1rv1'i i ` C { l0" AN.'y�� ww Tr I� ! Y,y.�a4 l l '4:f I 4 N 1 i'^v� . I M l tv.% ' Itr7{ Yc h 3S I .'i I .{t t:'bC,'`r^- i•} tEf,�rt 1.yjvY pie, l It 1 '1 Kr•} L1, I4gt` 4 .�,J4,I�I. a y I 't _ 9 j F A% *K %kv:r$7. t. If t 1",., n p{4, ,f tsy`>t i v i ' x a r{ 1:J firIt a , - Y t n tr t, 77n r I r t At tS Y a ','- 1 ,114 )74i dEt.yit- 1,4;1g01.*.'h hr I{,. i , i� 1 YJ I 1 I@ tr r t r� o I •l4 1 e 'J I xl M�t. £ . a+a.r .4 J K I LI 1 1 rYl, ' 4 E1 11 .. �'Y t S W6 t r z0 z4 s .t• G r fw 1 t „ I 1 M1' vF ,7t r. :,`i ;6i dii l'La P kirr d wit y , ' L41 S.Jo- ,,e 1 *� "J `i14 .I c 3n ,... vwi y� r ��d i a M1, ro ' .r K4. la it 5,. .1. 'iv > 2 jt,h i Sf � S t 5 a r n i w ,d tii k Y•t ,y .v L" ' t%-l'U •,19i� I {f ky. 44p Y+. JrAt✓Itt t? -r t I++ <r vd 7• 1 y d p l y,f I ^t -' Gn ,t1Yf j ,+'7°{ r .+1 t .( a .. °".c' f'" s'k ,4 +S. \` i • ♦w � c:rP'tri I i. J I t 2 I r 1 t ( A c'. s >r sr ' g1 Aq r t l r.' wn tf l ; I w S e }, cii t t . I4 a. f }4,17 ;,,∎ I G{4t. Fick. f a! t r ,'f 4 7411} :,<. v .r- v >..,.. ;4/7 r N r. k y t y 7q' E ) s� I !7 i ,� ..R v l a - { fr d s . ut"�S.J '' a � , f ', a Ir rtf).)1y1� �1, (F1,)2f)N.),17 sI ' ai 4 Il`1�I t Ib } 1 q f tr J- ':tt,S. na m• 0' ♦ .9 t }YYIN hpI (S'p/ f 1�' JI 1 htt' { v 1 P..�a 1tA Y 1 rr::e Y� Il '19 1t . -, ••••. t ., I y ,. ,, L N t{1„ IrYY Lry2 � 1 if' � u v ia1 xl It "..1 ° y - Y t 14115 I Y 4 p a 1 'i! a 5..1., 4F qtl 1 v k{ 5 " r 1 nJ/y.1 w 1 < { 5 3 {. m � t c 's'v r x '1 Sxrliti IY i" 5 �`ht SLh' I,{a `i 1 f p s It . ., -x.'' t ' !w5 l nt• r a�c v e l tit l ' s! yT[. '� � � 1 �,t ''441'4 < L. I I tt ro � I F y ". � d , Yt P� TSP r t r l C11"5/,...17141.;41;4 Y t �' V 1 C `` `b. . .k^ ty"�'t,y1/4,4;%.-,4 t > �.;�, rL a t � n �} z .t t � t i t" mn y1 l�55��t ! 1 f 1 r 9, "k��h,t 's e dot e,.a c I'� i u�+. 1 Ilr. . ."{J .S ...0 t lac AO., li:47xkitr q n 1 .r' sr 1 q f. .t l • I •'1. GG ' I s' t � � t n4�Vi4 � FJ 3 � i � t i � t.u5 f J�. Ir �t�,�ryw t k 2 int P r -t a LktMi 11.tFlti .Y, rt� rlt t 1DJ e t c { 51 a� 1 r+i �a 1 l� .;1,41,7, "� ^'-`;;I%-r F N .;Ic 7- �...4, I t l',-.“c t. " w �,. c.. tR Yrl( " t r r t a t t xd • d e p +1+�! n a 't. 4 1. rr '- 1 r i Y tP ! x 5 ! , ) ry(� r J 1 � ' I l 1 IK r 1 tW "SEiR r MR'i"Y I i't '4q`{dry ' .c.-„,,.. " � 7, °' Ilr I la -nl v.l y„n4 „t:`. .* ,,,,3 , i f 1 ��SS y u `Y'Mj 4 y r Y i v ,i t >,„ I t 41 Wk „": y� :5"40„‘,. 1'.i.4 r 1. ✓ .,,-,04. WTI^.. a.>• (, P Y 1 I! u +{e 1 Y+ 1r Yrei l ...p 1y1t !v n,. ' Y t`T..�1i`tt 4 7nMn1. � 'S'ffi' !...j.,4 t rv 'L' a1:11,$k.,...-‘4,14,,;114P.,' � ^ . (k r f>Y Ltn Fr. �i {�fi4 -S .. ! , 1 N[F } y� lJ CA afF' i e.r R � i / xkH`'r}T4'tt�: ,r 1 ri T fj�tk 1,1 iiryq .4,+7rtjr-�r {ATM`h{7ttt.,:p 44);:tY,Ra 111 ' t ""J t )1%)),;‘,.6 t'K r I 'y. ' Yt r ' { + a r f tic: T Atr SKIS Pt li i t.E. t t, ,SF' t P C I ; t , .t _ _. "*._._4it 3 Ke t ,,t4+.'lc r Jt tra P� m' Iw2'q tp Ott g3C"'i e.;:-.'� .n,,F',Rt ,: i'r I r t yr :mss T J:. �; 417 m.. - vn i Ijrc n , ;,tl4tY 7„pt ry'� m^ k + 'r ,t .1 1- r i t, `,t ..L�g��i x 214113 Y,P..r,t�`ii„..� d �.ptn zIW 6a�J^S t dYl y�'utaT'"y"Sh 1'vtw dry Ytq _ r 1 Sy I r r t f 1 '��y^.,<•R?e 1+ "Sl� h,. i'i l' . .am✓.a 'y,. 1 4Y' "ta"K'4- xkn" 'vtl.47. '1'' .g KS"J ek t u r.F t 4fi 5 if n i. i F" ry* Z�r� e -IC 5- s f r. Y 1 a+T+".4 t: c'",, ,r,'T,;to YtOyv yh!t'i�ti'i' r6 n1"u.7t"l t .e,3 ! .? 41141,61:1549 ,J. y `,;''� T + 1 7 r 11W4 4 4 za V'il,03 i fr*r/ viJl 1 ' r _ r fr a4� A (M J'I { PA ' a° ytJ1�� iti.iil,�,,t# itiFitinf ie.:( :rvr ,Irua A : 4 k1''"}".,`tyy+d r• t a`it+, Ike Xr m ,, . � ti,"�4 J l.nkt 'h I. ' l 11 v 1 ,i SI r t4i+ % ' '.. lay rphx/k� � • �F,,ml. t f 17.' ^4'A c�1 sr : G;ff b R� �' 0-t It L .--'. ee. Y _�. �'L"r '{"F'. VX t 7"" § ,.�i -�— -".,-G. gg4%)--- daitt-y`. . Cm..„.r 744. -l"Th iL—t2e i ∎Mr, tR ...... �..K44 ie .-�"t'`t A_,724.?Y,.•^2 a`3J iajaw,.ntx 2 ` '. rowtftYeewt�+eV'�..:winth'M1Y-�+t>hF1M,r.smr, !1'r!v1.. . o-.. 4$���`J?.- •_rr'i t tt.1. a"i5'' yH r J'3ro ,a r r r. + qm. w M r z m Y..:., hN" i w Y et,)lpa a :. r¢t aw r- ar sz i e r:y p t1 yt 1 iJ n 1 {S k 3 ' V s 7 t { %rt f --,','1?--,';',.;i1"."2,, ..1•r �4� as �.4"�ap f r 71,•h • �+ �r_e r C-., v, i :t".'i Is I er m p•t E I 14,74 Ww Y >,gtma: r (- r1' m 2 fo 17 t tl I _ s 1t ;.:7:::,-14-7 I( L 1 a a 1i Ricfr 7t11( ♦ A J'fk i�ty{,k .'..t'is� .t t'LY" • ti, ♦ ig. r r1* tr i } v III 1n' 5 tailL�� .frf3 r } 4"1r/n2- eex ; LLIT 4; tt! 1,1 1 �, I 1 ( ;tu � Y.a' ., ':.1/ l .1 Je 1 1 1f :'1 F2 t S .'11 ;t ilt ; I t - I�r l ii_ r 'I t s1, '' n• %..i i '(4 hl 1 4 c4 1! ...,• I• 1 le.; ' jt° 1 +5i c.' Ka 4- _a i ('6r P i.4: Z r I f .. . 1 n It r :. F▪rtl.isti*"t E . ri tir 6,.4. f .xr J o t i r t 1 t J 1.* >~ PIl L tl '.12.-1,''� M 1 l° q ,,,,. i li »W'+ �,f�w 11 .sir t 4 ..w 5. i C :-.101:4'.-1:AI• 1 , 1 t11C 4ii tlj -a!y `(i t r.;••• I R PY t} L y .. i F "L' 11 4 14 �'Ifl ,1 k „, r ".A `S,+'' nA rrvaa 4 A z c.. T .,u• r .v, r q n' as�r. i yr, a'4 rr Wl l ,y f , , "+v.,ln 1P -tv �A w. 4,,,m;%.,..,..-".".17,..",. .',rerC r 1 E�}y. y +i • t t. `W t „�.I' 35L1'.w. :ba ya.,C r,++5'J . . 1 ti I Pt°drr ,'.a�„� r f" y iNr .e. ,y.l F.,, Ww' 11,,,^�� 4�.' I tc-3 �r �k i a 1 k$G°� 3.' w J, L as .9� 'ela, r Er r r '2' " t rG M y,,e. .a A1.: � t }�i f .4.1-4:-. 1 . �-zza -'-ax-1 ^' v l�•*era"�'nPgitZ ., sty` �-'°w-irrx '.t 's:- 7` srr 1 'jr.,.:..;:) r.- 1�` .�i`E+ x h'k t'ty 1..- It ,VJ'11,.*: " 1 4, ,,:-ti n{.)_ ,: a ue+ � - : R ! A f .7:: 4{„, .�1 It v'I074, zhirl a -,a 'r c .4.::, vYr"j1y*YM t ^ yY y y 3 R t. ,,,,,p,,,,„ _,, -",„1�J fnc/1 fatto�y ' "' �4 lei'°9^� 2. fi J ° c 1. � I-,, C ya v;Ift4 ' It} �nao,,6., aRll �6t V <i.,2; ov 1 pe. : x xtr Vtf,ixn a 1 7 `F7 rn l' 1 J ti71 1 LY-y ., I,�_ h IM Kr ) .hft'' r r 1 ry 2' ,1 r o $ .�n .�? 111 1F rr Ibxh � ,.,rst.u.,ti.�" 1},i �' °i+3""I '}.t 5r u r t wf � �` � Y `r ' n ' • Aw r .i s ., i �yng*,', t2r4d� .'fit t,f^.. ,�Ie t ul ,y, y li 447,: i0:1;:'• e• E• �4F ).Y1, 4.: 1I�l a;''r'^<�1w'k�' .E( .,t; ,4 },:j ! 5yu%j�}itM':'t%^Y`'rvl• JFCJw_ " iY :ri, �t`'t��yp '�71 r '' �d{�°.x.._ tYU�" 6 +, �'t.EXHIBIT B ;ft� ' 9_:� , �" ., � :ii • B . ■rra ! ?If 1,3 Yr■■s6i�— sa5)f II� .. , � +, I I • it Tr I I rar� T . .I I ,gtt lot :i5 JI ` 1I a r I laIli I� IY ! \ II �II!III JO •I ' I 1 „ .1 41{, i 11 IE ;siiii ' ' 1 L'ya. G r I all 1 �, ,ICI II .. E I � I II,f II.',1;1 l� pit 1I F ,�i rilk+ +' I I ; e !E� t l�l -..I F III ( d } , Lo 6 l 1„ ‘..-1-i I I Si t " II ,', rlf . i� �i! t1 I::::1 +., ��iea II �1/ I 11( � Fr - c i'f;�`°° 8 i, , , fnl +c�ll� 1 . ,I r 1:I It i ' —„r5 `lY 1��1 I it JiJ , • ' hi r 1 I Y@ .:, v,0145,11,.^ I f f��JI � tea � . ) i I � r, I y'Il1� uustgg I' @t3 :s! r,. ; �� 1� V ',.0 t l i I 11 +1,i.fli ffil J -.. +e4jl, i'= 1IiIHtc Ir� � + tt l l rl � IIII . iF a .... r- 1 L� , 1 ` 1 are I,;111:;,741N R p -f Iry ' r. .+ r ill I ! !!l--- I IltIlkj : ..IS I I .Z I -- • }�.., ut,'1t ; r)'f{ 0:a ! � zRw 11 �: I hl-.F I' � III jKI 1}ir q a +{�, ,� I II tltl'1—27, 'LII Eli fLi` E$ — — ''f,V nr [xC, k"'11dt7a�.on. 3LTU'4('�. m x IQ I.. -..aaaa�aaa,a a, ,,.0 w M -may{ 1 u r uYi[1 \ CItS 1•p ,te : pS 1 f , " r' 41 t :Ni 'y IF tl n, rrf .� n •r I t ' f !� • EXHIBIT C I I A,B,&C— 10 • a .m� - I e . , . ,..„ . ,,. h ` 4 ''I I' ; M {i1 el $9 �I U _Lulu ■■Q II Ir I \ — tt 1,,', `. : 111'1 . !'r ,II • r III. e ` III .I,�I•'""+� i II a — f 711 N. ;:. f ,11 ill 1 `I 1 11 N' i 19 ', ---„ 1 'll T r./(l t I L,14.14,,',.� 1 II 1 Iu ,:, �'J 1 --y lir ___J i—_ 4 �l 16 ' • r! V I��.. f}��JI• a r \II 11 1 as ---- I ,; _ ' r � - I p::,: I ' ?� 1 1*.'HSI W ; E h i is V t, 1I' II ti 1�.,_ ✓ S 'I' Pt r r ' 1i 1 I Z h 0i• II 'iE Eke 't I 1; ,i j K `-le• — a II--— cc— `5 1 �F w N,v�E, ; l F — iE a� I II * I R _ -- a r ( it „ ---- Ir--- `S"--.C:ti '- �!rt.� III: j I�I.I- I , rill f-a — ` ,�rl_� b$511r f y� 1, , the: I II :pi al 'n, t! 1 % I $ �1!! 9`1' 1 , !! L t Ost ffiI 8 ail s �r b� r '`1 °' 'u ri r 1 1 lit 1 t,l I I I• ry _ t rill,:-.0i.11 II ' 4 ( r a? . .-1.,' III ry A � ■CJ` fil n -_81 8 `� 1't`t .!�j III%.; ,. 7 Iz. '� 0 gem i I f th' , I i 1 I I i r 1 i` 1 11 ijii:di'`r � 1Y 1 a' ,111S,r :1;,::111:11:, 1i I p•-•,-'7":':, CIE ,Ih " I�I a; yF R `���// s •A L1l� I.. it net i I 11'~ ` _ _ _• /JA € , °� 1 Ir Cr� li•. MITT l Id rI- -y t '� _.1 'k l �a" 44rm �- �— T'^YI -tr.4.�4r Lf�4 _ 1 1t f ry - it 1 1 'r I fi - ' ?rl 3daR�_ {1 ,t i , ,`'. Tl' I 1 ! E' ,� , III rI ___-__., ., i.EXHIBIT D pi.,. 1 A,B,&C— 11 I ; alllt �i P ?,t� S6 11 11(1`S 11 ! � I a'= I P it 1 i I ! i r i Iiii i i t 1N I 1 p t Y 1 1 d E ii i tI 1. 11' i1i1illiFLit.tj i gi I km ibatii};: Io�: � $ • �I li 1 lit;`.FBI 1p11 ��f 1 I i .Ip 111�1a1p�Y1� I' ��I�I 1 P' 1! a iE,I i 1`s 15 3■I �'��,fl� 1E111111i116it %IPI !:110"!.!1 ::g!!..1,1� ! 1:! 1 ei-i Sil al I. 55 sit -..// /> / / / iii ' lu I i I :' ; 1 � ah L i i ."— i Sy v i It �111 • i� 11.��- ill I �al.< '. I YI \ 1. -.,,,..,.;',...:„:.:1. ,.y I. -'11;', '. i1 -:i e 1 !� I dflf.2al P, 11� ', 411 i ; 7 9e i 1 �� ..° i1 ,1 '` I 1 1 1 it iilli I .• .It, t �', r,. ^1 . I '16EEIt�41II I IIPIiliilf9§ P 1 11�� "101I!0 1; j I , i ISi;Eitt'ii1i� PIIPPPIilllil ll 1 ` ! �1e a6 LI 1. .' �� i' r aI1 a a I �om.�ce� 1�1,�� I WF 1k�` Ii_:5 II y tP i ., fill! i iE I ; 1:i9 19ilt �ka.," 1 i i' tai I.1 Oi I.1 1„,,, 0 - rt 1 110,11 11 $•1 111 1 I o . III aI i " Ill Y l.p,I-�l ;m Iee I i oll�, I t ww� I� R •4 ifs ' . Ipif III!A1,14 it it 31` Mg 1,1 °1 et It1 44 I 1• = _'�_..1f �� 1 I! I pill ijl i•E•1 E41 1 e tled! Ai CI Ph 11 e1 �,. assler� it :pi j. ➢5 �. $1t1o1�lliy(1�E11i ' 1 e 1 090:1! Al 1$1! 1$101 11;01 al c :,1 I It I i „ 1. I � `oil iie! i ii '' 41 �ia 6. is $I �P 0!111; 17 1� �p r�g� 1i -. IIII .' I ..- I 6:• i ' 1. :I 1: 5 i 11 w 010"1. 1' ':I I II-1 i 1 1 11 I a3, 11,E 011 l0> i.._: I I; ,01 e!111 c1 113.1 t1 i!o Iif V $;a .a i$i Ins-4 i r 3'1 ;4'41. !.1 i! IS I.if p% Al,ii `s 1 'lE : elI.• I• i Y, I- E5 P,1 Y mamm Ilfi 4yii 101 !ia E t 5 ° t 1'$ ; iti i��' .�- 'a� s,•I y.i s1 1�11t h 1�i 11 `�E•$ . IY t i 1010 > EI F!I 1 11 4111 i`I i I�Rq�i1 Ba j'ff. g ;I I, iEiti I. 10.1•�f y I I°1! Il•1t I; i u� i ii1's6li,E I l;! ty ;1,raa: .1 .;• , I 1 i I ` .1I� f _ .1t;1P 'in !4ii 141144 ill . t l514 I. .4 ii Ili 11 milt •9 •q •y i� �, 1IIIIIllllllllllllllllll II ( IIIiiiII11IlIIIIiuiIIIII ;II I . F Ih eYa 1 r ! �I I�i 9 11 .11. :11:1111 i d 1 ,d. •N •tl 1 ' 1 Iii 1 IO1 i 'I : , . I 011 _. rrr 1'tFy I 11111111111111111111111111 ' r ' ' iEi tl uunnnunnnuuun , � 1 t tor, •�;'p•s ' ,j1 I E ,, E y i I I�P1eBiYl �I L I ..1w .u. .1G1w 1 ' F ' �� ifs i� i:. 1 i.. I! "oleo rrl ::" 1 �' it i I 1 I 4i P1 �a II a1 ' j°,,I ; IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL- ifi �l• ii'1 1: 1 '1 1 q III, 1 11 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL` 1 0•U ,'' �... I ! u�+,r ` 4111 1 '! . FI .»...a2b—I D �,`.:` rr,,,,a, V.;it �yt ' _ 1' t I` : . I. . , ii •l` a• ,f it r 1, A,B,&C- 12 P -,---1 • iffi b° E cLJ a •3 71131bw tYk rpt d: d d F i , . m 01: ' , :irk i � k! l !I r r i e 1 � d • . ,, 1 12; l II . I ��YYY d lilt' > p •_ [� pp�� y■ ppp� I I �`-_. \IL �a 1h 4 I �` �� I• �I 1..� f ,t f 9! ' ( L • t , .� f Jl �i s i `' i`. y .�' 1. s { -_ 4 •d . ` •d• •i d e„ :I F,I �/�• in ;: e- ° it ;ii • 1 C�3aClr' L " f 11 I i s i u Ic, , ,� II Ia ; !{ w11 *, R I • ,,Ift ,i i I s � ',lb; i I' •t i ,I � \ \ ' , I , Id , ), d I II f. • 4• d E . l r l i`q lu t Y I II ` ,t ?v1!11IJ t• ✓ I1 I'll ,I `d . El I, I : oe :/.. " �4 •. i�! �� �' ` 1I ' ! l < Y_ ' ill i1 $ I u' era - r=ia-(� � ih,es1 Sig EI A. 1.;,� - ,L1li i 111[ ▪ 6 i" , rl � .. • - ,llv, , .m { 11 1' � I,I �Iin . ; R qL i ,II �i i,II I ,.i A,B,&C- 13 tz— li ppo3 I I'IIJ ' ! il vi -1 s1II I ,11I I ' J _ 11 � ir'�/ �'J i IJ: 54 \�1: � II � I: „ :iv 1 .1�.•1 dQA3Q fl� . :� ' 'I c I L 1 1 , ! . r i I , -t 11 .a• . zL- I �I ' ' o1 ;° •1'N' = rT 3I � � ''�' ' g • I �II9 �_.. 66 •1 l{ ,p, 1 rr I" , 1 6 A s.ia 1 1I m>O - ---���_ 1Cfi ;N i , ,,, / ..,, , _ .. r 4 i: „ toi.., zq ipt:::�l p I 1 i1 ' 11 d- c____ _ 1 �� _ III , � r1 G jt I, • � 1 p C zLa. s-anInr A,B,&C- 14 —H , 4 , i koitiii 0 1 IF" 11 I ks ir 1 : 1, II 1 1 . I ii . o - 1,, ,i,„ „ ,, k!N - e p 1 al r 1 1 -4 p it ,lJ . I t f� tl q �.., Ii1 t, 111 rI111 Ads B`; i x [Hill to In i• co 1. 7. 111 � °e - . - ..—.[ 1 1. .II..II.=da1p$ I; : H 9„y : 1 1 1 , ; i ^ I 1 i li, e t : • I li s1 Iii:11 ]t i 1 1 ' Ill 'Iiliiliip it liiiiiiiIlli 3 iikiitiiiithi iiliiiiiiii111 I talE ' 11 I. L 1' -- t� i _-' - ii as i1 ' , i s ➢ lift �' — . _ _- __ l 1 P I'M 1 �l I f� 1 owl��E;i�ol __. 1 it __. I 0 st !. PAilly 1 li 1 alai ! l' - H El 4 1 . L ri 1 i A,B,&C- 15 r n : r 'T+v f 11 r Ir)1 I IEwo MEWL mlo; it,r� _ - 1 �— _�•�.n.... 1 � � 1a�6 ��lu RrO:l v' Ii Y. Ii• I ,< ��-- It _ I 1 1 ''' Ifs �I' �. 1 ° �.�.�.■•m.a non 1 1 [L'0 LG 1 :p,,,...,.11:11 —�.— O 0r_—...—.0—.0—. A 1I 1 - �t ti c r�p°t E7 . ç ,,, „,i WI i 11 '� I 'i \1.,1 ---.sue.. I .:'0-s n e•'m-",46-4-%••"1•7:101-•i�`t! i k�ir• I 1 _ �._�L Llp'.t 06. _6. fl M�I: 1 w_—'-- 1 1 l ,II 1 ;Vol,'' A -- LOT is .M'' E 1 I r IJ1{II _oil —' -1-----)C-" :AJfli/IS,—........'.—.�'Z tit ;7 �'. •(� ' r I,i 111 t , grey I➢lrlM l� �1i11 �, � .. cN•-_'�.•7.'r� I -- �6I-l i ill 1..,5,1.1,1•1:t.1-11 I I -- 5j1� r e I9 ' a :I .me. .e ai xv:mir. 17211 ,g��--5��t,�; -n14- jO.\-18 ,_.—'--.-J '` ii ;'boy p .GI. 6 �I6'b�y,'�y . w 1 u L"�"___ 1 , Irby.' ' it -- �.�.�Pfr 1 li ni : Jail 1111 pi, 1°1111► . Air 0 IQ ¢� 1� f ;:' l„11 -- 2'i igir lA•�A. IW !" IFi•./Or . 1 Ii.--•,...p i 00,;]:1 1 :�.�.�r h; �''� -.e6..m.u:�w,_ 411.'...-aL a4II •Th.'- 1�.,), I-.. I :. .— .. P 6ii®�laid� ligi� J' R A 1 t Rf �•— t it 1 f[,1 l M. �iRYls# 6 �I alt„1 11'1 41 1 - 11� V _ 2241 I �w'is 9 ll'f( 'l l - -_ _ _ roil I I Lam_ �.�11111HI1 ',! i = = = = 11„ :,;\- �6YYYIU nrsenogsr_mm e..01.1 I; ' v� il'I 1 I I lI) ! ..'E jC, alr.ric.' n .6i1Yt —ru ' I e�7 �ti1I1j ∎kl 1 =11k1 ''x I ;I 1 � 11s1 � I = 1 ._- p%�lmri MOW,I} . 1,E `, ,c_.1 w iosinmr,aiaciu i ,:ice �� mf�.M.[6..! � ) `t I �, 1 . Iii ,.1•ii r, l 41 L ! '1 oyf 1 1111, 1 ■ s 1 IV i' �!� , 1�iy1 Iip !y- pL L, �. �I�y. 1 _ -- 1 -- —=:ti.rrag ,..T u'—--- ---_--_ qua.... _ t-j !MW6;�ran RIM W11165 • .°”" s w ann in* a_ om - --mss--_ NS • • - PI�AVWRY� RAN — 6 1811.1 r:,1 .r _—_ SEE ;: 4 --— CROSS SECTIONS/DETAILS =_^ w++�• EXHIBIT E A,B,&C- 16 ■. /#* w i r, 9 .,1 mall"C'fir ��Y+ -�.*:lii�t �,:�Ir lIS�-_s7%i�'�I • 1 �' gW * rte Ikr ,w oa • no lei■ ,--rt.: '''el■Ire lif i. '' 'nil ' III • � r w.ffrI'Ii11I� 1¶ Sa � . �_ +�!� ? e'�,..• /�`.tea O _ al ra- in ;tt 'iI #1., 11 1►;i ��P ./� -4n■it ini amp igli rralKioriiii�ft/� I��lA.il'ir.] �• v I .1_ � ) I� ��� I �.,� _ Prior if ,l'IItigd10••%i0, i •-isms t ��. `;SI',, ho 1)•!� II'11 ref -if ila yrirgalbtilligegili ti 1 ►• Sege .,{1 paw r/i�� ..•i a���a•� )7 y fi,1 - .0 rriic,, ilirn�i1 -.'. � --'iIT'irlsiew,c,, �.I`��.� �'Y.�!k' r �s� f w ;r ae •... ry., 0'" . ter` ®nstst ti '1'!i t�6�wY?®s atirS f ainfil--1115 i e.•.1.. �d7diP..tY _-y _k.. r" � a�—S_li.-.— '�-/ _—' _- T 1 4 q1; rIit' I. '°Si cc k Coil' 14 ri�r._ �•.G e w.�i/l i 1 ... �_ia u ,�74 -P - - '��� - IR+ YBR/t . - - >.. pm it We r+RELMORr GRADING a,w 22 R1RlEi�91D8ff&�TTI I .aaIa�a�I �S MEET CROSS C11UIWTALB C""'�1 ` '"' ell I A,B,&C- 17 paimalia, L, r ilk 21 V.1113/4:kirif ,th Pr rl- r -' -1, Y 0 r IP ' al .� �. - r ava sir- a aft-71ra • al:; p co � u li n I br Gl \ilormi±j; � � ir ' lily rir" ��iWi4 i� �� iii _ iii �-= Es eriininArifF101/is wit ,,:;i101, m• sursii.Xim 4i1413 ...ismildbj am-'11311.1 1 1 ....se 1I*t1[IV'64 trarS .illtis II .� affilallifiLtm I^„� / Al11511.-1411 4 � j r,.. y __ .1 z���r "� 8 7 = s —v� �.. . -crap r. i Bre pmt. , , t 4-\._ _/-. - ii9 �' rr ' 4 Y 1St a"re-,.-),cid i , , . I 1 - 1 ye a� n, � I pr ,ME, 1 ,b V c: .- �r L _ PM • . I a q1�18122 FOR LE01301ME SEEM r _� T%1tAti r TAL8 ��'._�F'''' Yia�iti� e A,B,&C- 18 �jJ1 II X ire % Ls . . ,„ ,.,`� T • . 1 1,,, .:0 ..ekTit,,,, . .• liq a Fat igc rill:411 irirt . "I', gra\s'fr ." 1 litilL &API; ' • at t'-/ -"M"fi In tilt q _.- -FA 1 - - -- � riil � erii® L#" l __ _ _Pi 21Viik�I I ,1�� t ;b 1•iu.� r� tes , J ifj 1f priggiar clgaart iiiht--------__ -•,_A-Mti--41j:.: , -Th-j-- ---IN- L- .;kJ iT2 -141110:10r4110,-..: nr L"\-.4:: .iral ,till i t'd -: �' 1 -.-_ - l L-415: t \---3,L-1/41---ito ifss... "..." it 2- It T r� v E � i/\- air ' �' l+. • /-:n •. O t-��yap n - .o4 i, 11S r �. , C.' ,rt`- "tic'- .'-tee _ w-PC-- �_•`.,. ..__.._ -' Via.. - M ` I ,a E _ �1_-. 1 • t we Cl MP PRBA/ANRYGRADIN PLAN N • Taff FOR L 3 E D8ff M I _ ..� �. �� SE WET GORR CROME71011SCETAIS �jp 'h • r ones • . A,B,&C- 19 . r 7 I V V 1.--■... f , " ....a...... Ini • . 1 . O 4.......„L .. 40 SW. ma ire-Itirmi' t 4 '.\PAIS VP: V i !c- al= ....■ IN■B tor— Oa I iglinin. i I I l 1 P "''' _......... MS liOntL as 1 lII011IlRI- i %Unapt a - so. : In127r2V.It= 'aiRMILES"1.11 744;iiiallnla — ---...------. .—...... I Illiaa —.— aft.... • • I . I ' . 0111MWEIME -- NM ! 4 a ••••■ k it imi - . iniums- MCA ale = a . 11 WM ---th,---■•.-ar . air= °a rar"..141° a - 1......Z.Mint• ==-111111ONIpa •••=„V:r I= i.e.. Wild . .. . IMOD ..............., — al / ....n......, / ..,•....... 4/ 110.na ....... .. m...... ■ lEel=r4 a÷na ..„„..., • JIMINUIrilla _...i. . . --- - 111# -'''7....-... .....u-. .. .- 01 ..... ._ . ...... ! 0 •wp,A4 ---- ..,.......... aa .......... n rir ... ....... , -— . . tronaut■I ----- . ............ -•--- ••••■.....•■•••&-- DATE OF W a.mmo LOT 10 ......,.... IneaffINWOR4DINGRAN - SI • Nan", IlaPIEWSNISISIS alalalen affliffir 1812/ . marz,Dagg241, ell .1 A,B,&C- 20 r 7 1P141 Mils (ytfPS ' L r h?iE {S �vf°i iilu1 f� ' .a 41<, l a� m �__._.�...-, • • , ` f r,; ^ , ,�' 1: � ,r� ._ - ��-. .—_- iCP 'al 2 ILT. 4'P P l t _ v_r�ur- ..+.._„ IIC l 11 t. C s:,1 161■ r OP t yip®gyp t t ..-..e 1i \Ci, t: I-\:./N WW l..•eeo is r`h,� i'I ._-..---._ .-sae s...-u_. # = , ..:41' VIII, _ --- m .—�-ee MT, 1 (=Fatalism is III t �'{r{l�'q(j it :I ---- ---• • �� i 2M.•001....`101,-.19111.111 I I '1 � �� �.—.. LDT 1a te°—`m'r�..i. f f�'1 .......... —Y----Y-- C T:1-"--1',.-� r'„"_`![s>�=- --: I,l) y ii'j''I' IVY _--_.--�• Yf1 i it�' 11 I V� �3l`t, r -- I. 11 i as PI I % - �1 , 1 R_..Iau..,a. otPL•n..:ua.r4 eP 6' li a--1-711-q H:' I' r �a L I „ _, I__,_„,. i `` fta , • ' II_f -�_ l,T'a P.glasRS.1...siP!tP� t , i. — Y-- , 4 �d �[�i it l ,1a ' -^� I!��� rd ,'�^ 1 �' l�`�Jlil a'rti Pr 1i4 u9 k.-¢ji i” tff..RV ry -14i•.n+ p'• (1 Ill ]_..�.d, t, ,:or,..?,..,)::., ,ifil.« u''!l�Y�S I' Q Ii�N�IBIi� ��- i III% Ill ___ . __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ is __ _ _ .._ ._ 1V r Itq,\T.rlbs,.lA.y 1 14-a q,��.01 ,_1t 1 I — — — — — — �' � Ali t 4 a II Ili = = _ = = _ = =z. mm mm a a ti i sir finer wIr .tw_Irs.n i 'h �I II'1 _ mm a _ _ _ • _ I �i>'^ 11 f- •:v tIP2 .tre-.eYt. u I mm 1 a 141 H Id '.P�P- • lowinutpt,�I Ii@Iy^ �I it f v.1 - --t—l� 'A {�— 'I/ � -A {�P •4, it �V�pII if i., iIa+t ..- �.- rF Yli item 11 ',., e, ! !IL. i�i� 1 p1..- ---i�.._.._J i�:iti ,f`&.t`C 4�Pell j•— 14€r Vm,.ovc ww,, . ` t Ar �,� , 1'J v n f _., r& gym : , ua I , _• ���_. . PREUMINARY WALL il FENCE RAN • o�..._..-..-.� _ -- rlset.mm 8. SEE SHEETWFSFOR ;yid —� e� E X H I B I T F _-- -- — _'CROSS SHEET WF5FORILS �. ®� A,B,&C- 21 0 f 1 ry Fi, ,::,..2-..:c.:-. .fff_... - 'exs. ' ._ 1,1, Y 'xrs-'.' I : .� 1 L 1 I rrY I a !- S �� l; s'�I F1 f I . .. �. - I 1,J 1 - .c' tl 3 LI! -y I J ,It �, t--+.,---.A '/-1 T I[I a 5 `e k1 - y,'sj— n -y- ••_Y-;•%r_•a. -ef..:ii , ` ,.. !C3.„.. _ S . 1 ! n J - , ! i -'ii.--: E;t+ai 1(g Y Ti w .I,t&< K: r�+ }.�s E }_ A:L=2! .)ij )t" YT 1'. ..--"- ,/ (1-�r It c't =1}-7(11 1 ' } D_____,..,,_,^- 1 ty0--1 - �I � 'mss. l 1G}II _ �._C �`c ti � J : 4 4"r -1- f!1 i ^4`c T---•FYsL '- y-I }t i t f 1' II, 1 . i, ...1---' 1 � 1 �!i �t Way�'' - J, a� \ �lh - �I FhrJ J 1.I• ..1Ftu.`.—`i-r ffar Eat.. s t -iY -..�^' , a._:rr�.ase- 7 °= k. _ _. `�",'�M I Sri ..r "'`"'��" ..-. , 1 1 Itr {"1:- — " I 7. 1 I •s' '1_ - 1---,..-L-11 j cp I I'.I. �\- - -- t-' 1 Lim-- 7.,t .— I -" :,,,�f� .�.+� � - ,. o:\- ®mil®� ®� �I° ,i-:- 14:11 p _ _\ 1:c4 4. az='y L'3._z.- r Srm .:ask. ,J )"} -6 _„ _s� It , I Jj II.I-F 1 ,�:J' .- �'. \ ."°_a °�. ` � 1 -�d3.�.L�)rij j ,1 i 7 J • 1 -f-' r-.-? 1 �J>>• YI { 5 [ f. r r I ^F. 14 Y _e 'a'• J. 2 X . 11 t ; } rl — Y 1 �IAY'sv � , I7 ! ;,/ ' ' I k� ,' 1 4' i 4! 111, �-.14'4 x 1 , 1 \ .. �I 1 '11 `I I , - K I ' YI 1 I i I (1/1?'; 1 iIL 1 1 s .-.1,- Ta t ;" ..d.• .- I�i'flw,- `4443;;;!1,;%/i '' 1 . I F j 11' ),.. l 1 ._1h. ' l .t;f Y f 0 n _, , '' ,I.- ! 1 J ill ti < F 1 1:1.- °r .:- !tR✓ 1 t- Asa+ 1 t 1S`'y.i 1, i, -) cn yr.. `i it rr I� r -E,ial 1,J 1 , 1, I.I r�• .l.- I . �Ir ,,� �_ ,1 , = -4w I N / ..f l v 1 T e ^ �i Srivfi i 4 ta i r ��--- zi •:,::-.;•,h--.. , � 1Y "t7*� , r=�' y I ! .1 . r� t it n "'E I' r�' vI.JI��� t "i r.»�GAI, � ill 1 /Ut as! 1' f . ,,,p4\ ( { I >i`I' I,1 ��t�' i 1 <..I _ �r r 1 w y�l F Z Tr 1 l rr‘i .:^ F� ry, "` i'(\ "'� I��t i 1 r >W 1 +!}' " 1 _ / / 11'11 i Jt-0 � n , vc 1 €tg.s'�,, . h....0. r,.,L is ter- »u 1 { ' ,,,4 1 , 1 �-, e t -p ___ d ,„,q.>..a,,, ..,._c. s, ,,,.t\..4 ,rr„. �r„...'c yYKh. __r L ".' Y mx F. z. r' -� ' -- ,, R1 *1 _- •re r --ems ir _ {,e°'... -1n Y.. :IC:" 14F 1\ . .� f 1 .` F - ij'm� ' -4 c I :TvE ' i -1-- T; +� _•. "”- ` 3} ` % j�'91I�r10. ..r--..-5'. py l V rn e ;? ry *.. sAo�-Hw� ; 4:, ? V. .ab Y F �" : u - a _z„ '" ,= .t ' ,�Gir�' � . .j,:mi 4✓ W J f _x° t . �' rwN16 PLAN OYLAOAIQI�O Ni_ I 1122_MINtWITION FOR L I3VHEE SEET wW/ tI i cijflLI Ym Y { r_: M alL8ffpETNlFORCRO StECIR MwEtN.B L A,B,&C- 23 0 0 0 0 0 t6 , % � J rr" _E I ,; • 1F\ JIi i:r� • �x � _f I ,/ •-_, y�.�-,F`,:»Near) ° II`\ i . rEr � 'Ic JI t , I 1 1 f f 1 '' 'J : JM `1 4 it ..i i ; ,.i .1_1.)11 ix.,.._ I Ij Y'r1 , n II -I � i . 1,1E ∎ 'u li, t 11 - ry RI�, , J , - {1\ -. 1 • I / 1--11L„, l° t�';( -,e/ + tlillr't . I. t / � �% j .0 .� tut —2 - n �/ l 1;\ d klx 1 - rI Na .fig , n- - , 1 S4a it•� IIf �F F-41. ;L:._:.÷:77...-, y117 1 Ylik 1 1--^J_ { '-.47 u.' l Z If ('- ,t{ 7a�ieri� -,--...-7 'S:l ..�..`�. �� milt 1 \ Y- ,.._.5- - I'/ L-.,1- ! -�- -.- It i j� rod ' r . f -.v't/�+i. -i,. / f 7 .6e ver.�'1. ` ti u tlh 141-.At J l c,r e( . y `.--^e:.•e"-r , - ,r .1111.+-i, , ' u .,yl' 1 r r'�.anrr _ t-:-.-1...".::::- — J ` — y�y .. ew y -� .. ... �_�d.' _ PCP- MYLMDIlIQIIMO t PRELIWARY wALL A FOXE PLAN MIIINSII N O • 18122 FOR LEm0 SEE REST w:n I il SEE MEET RIFOR OROB88�l1 TAA8 e •M _..L ! J r A,B,&C- 24 • 7 7 _ t . . . MS. ...ay i ..." as". wma,aft 7 • • I . ." 1 . Lad. i bill A.,,CAIS e a. •- 1-- F-..-1110 ACSI, I ale pimm... e T 415114,.....en_n -v I N-...:1;i-______________ I — 11111=r ,p,...2 "if.. . "pip,' _ 'tannin as 04h, allnal -4;Ta;lkIg:1N- /S/Il• efir Mit a _-- _ .211/1Mralli imr ;ft=.. 0 I I 61111 ' . I--- — S I loit P_.- 1 L__.+_. . . __. 1 t911,1"---Za ..., afelalIN 11111.11"Mi ....... A 1 i tab.. . : i I ........-wi- S. .._.. fillVrer a-Ms= a ........... a- -- . . L aarlall s ‘ N lellIS . \ POO •••••••••••• —"•'' IIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIME .-- emor rEL- ....._ Oar •.•... •• *Nen •••••••' m. — /HISIICININNLJEKL .... . ainipMEMIL ...No....ce • ... a • ••••••°'"' ■ ........... ..... nu . at Eon ' ••^••• a- TE:Ite re ar"SW. fi SIW d ! .....„ EE_____ E-511 _ . . e_ . ..... . ---- ____ . ____ sae- -.,-- I.T2Mw 1-521111 ."----r ------- IMEAMIIIIIIV-- ter - — r rt or YAP war no,— stows .....■ .. ...... LoT la "■■• ReillaIRYIWIL&FRCEPIM ........ SS —-••••• 41111MWMI = . 18121 IINSINIIMIPPIIIIISIMIL IIMAIMINIMIEWSS REM ilte÷2 9 c_-__-_:Srfr..1....1 00 itreP 4 . .. MIMS am 1 A,B,&C- 25 F 4 srl 4 11,1 . •• LhE ;, =_ NU! ___gilL __:_ctit __Ll'ulk_ f>i'fir_ir -NW • P I 1 ; t it "1 • I co ___i; ..rfall..;., ii iii r Lm_g_z_r gag lier 1 1, ILI IFri ••■7047-7-L--- ”-11V" . tc.,4:.Vrt4§ xii1/4/ij. ...',4 -.PI 11 fff 1, 1 IL__.: ____ ii.k" _:_ ski. a._. - iccil gi it r _ r... '•„„ 1- A, , t 4\ . daftieie-,---- : ; . -.1 1 .1....,,..ta. tare ..ra ... a -.731 , k ; , 1 ..-., -,,,,,,5 Mai'IV''C,•r''--. -- . .7. Fa."'-1 . -.1.- -1.4. 111 -n-17)”.1 n ' ' lijkf' I. 1_ A:: ( ,... 1 -- -k-'- 11_1_ _) li‘i 1 ,/, Z ,I 1)1 4 ' \ ii , II 1 , \' cl 1 , ;). 1 *I ' 4:•1 :i 7' & '1 ; t ' 14 1 II °1,41 11;--1' ii I i., '''''ii ‘6.7-- - t--1- ± ics .. ._:::__ 2,4,27.?_ _tit .i.,171! I 1 I .* 1 .4 ::11 • II i' Ez— ' . Ili '1'4= Ve'rkr-C -4j1= 7 iC"-:"61(;:: rhi_cr_..t. it r: ii • : .1 tu, :h 1\. 1 i . \1 ' H.li ft \ : \ ; : II hff 1 los 1 ,. ;:: `..: ,, ., . 1 ;-z. „ t, \t ..4. itl ,_ , ‘ : , •• fa 444 4 - zs , .f.t . 1 , ;It ; ;iv / : Ft■ t tl, r , , ,_ : , .. ; Si_ 7 ' ' 1 r . ) , 11 _ .10....' .. 16. .1.ti I I 1 _ i Ell 11,.; lit‘ ;I-1-,- -7 ali ,..7r-h --. .a.c. .-- L-L:L=4'11Fr siagi rl tt1 I -; / ,og , A ■—:___._r_. . .,... ._, , il i 11 •i cp la tg 7 c II ' ' ,4 . • :t4 : I) i) : I: 1' bill 1 t ik ‘'. li 4 1,i ; ; - . , ii, : Hy: j \ 1 ', 41 al ; ' ' 4 1 1 1 41 1 -I .k i ari i i F -4" 1.1- ri 1 1 t. i • , N k■.11_4. '■_.-- 1' =-2--=- N__,. ± ib, ..2. L---1 _-- _Cs-i 11 li ' %I, etiiLS111 -ft-L11‘1 .4711•La __L 4S'ili_ __A.S.-- _I-).4:14..,-2- 51 , - , ''' NI / ; • IiI ilij YI ,---TTi •eti?ci--r 7,t;t7;7't;"tr4.441:1-- --- 1 Cr g ; ' -1:t H; -Ms IPI 1 , : i . II d---`: ll 1.4 --r--= - -- 'r: - jr----2Y-)"--- I -----S7 I ar I I ' ' 1 0 \ r-ti ; 'Ili , 1 I , \I L I " 1 lry. :1 1 I \ cl_ :icr 1piii r s i a ;,‘,.L • '‘si,,,". el\ , rt, zi yi kis L.55\ 1 1 ,•,.' . , ik I ili. , 7 i 1111 odik$jr IR II _ L \i,, A ,. \ 0 ‘ i Y 4 _ ki I I - an a II 1, / , } L'FA,Ii ‘: 7" \---- -- -tL'. 1"-■ - - - - ' i I III . It 14.2 • r L. I -T: • 13-_---_,L— \ 1 e'. I i; V —7 V-L g --, -+ J I -- ; -4*1 irl-' 4r. '''' 1 J, ift -75- 11 " ---1." it 1 ; 'li ' r ', ''.1 • s ,4 I a •-' ,• \ t 1, ) ' 1 F,,1 11 :\:'' ■ 1 IM 17: 11 -- : • Oa., 4, ' _.: _At- 4-);_,F ___ , ---,,, ' i'i EL t , pper h , is. \.. :7 . Stalfili T § 11 --4.-_--- 7}7_34.-:7 . 0 - ..e, ,, -,.., ,foi,.0% :;:r I'S I-j tir — Z b b te-E----n7--;-01-2/------2v.rurittr --7-- ..,-4, 1,c.. .,, , p,......1._:::in 4____: 1 j tt,;;iirrir d iii — - - ric. t -e' 74?-- a ':..t/IR1 c . 8 g g ,...,,,—.' , , .,-,,, ,,,,a..inio a, J.,,, ,..cm ilg , tw .‘.. f. ..-.- , c:t e--2,r. ‘(/ s,ti_.: 2._4.,_..,,i. c i:rt.0. 1 1 4. ..2_„I,25 r.I i.v .1 . s, teliivea 1111 z,, , i1 . r..........._ . :j ii it;-..----, . i ; Li IL ;ll iti1-; r--7- t: 711/ 41: I;;• •;; ' i I HI , '174: 7.Vra -t.t: if ' ( /,-,_!1 ,1ep` ri 1 , 1 i . I I I--s 1 iuti — — , \ irl ■1 ' \ 1!1 ;1 I \ : ( . <k‘ I r ' \ ' 1 I:I. \ 1 — I r [..1 \ > I 1 I i •111Q1 1 1 '') '.J . .c> •-■ , S HIBIT G A,B,&C- 26 ! e7 Iii• 7 ) n• „.„ .._ _ ,:.-_,.. ... { I , . e � I 4* Ii1 k 1 , c �1 - Iilai\ire I4���i,1 ',3ti,f-�32]4-(�II�-i1 �` ' , � !t la I l k 'L ., I L 4 1 i n i, S 6 4 i f j l r I6 1� ` i 1 ? ,_: r_. * '�E[[ iie�.a— �s_ _L.c.'s giN . t�•1-_ c 1 II a•'sc rl r 1'1 T 4 - �y ' F_ 4 '1 F ! i �t til 1pll'+�l l�t.; - I. } � I1 !, 1 Id 1,3i,13.1 1 ?7 I 1 !\ 111 �I 41)It 1.�. �g w 1 (` .,1�tj 11 . x{{:�1i ��II ,� ii � � 11 �.. rI ! { 11�� j ,. J g Is k4t1 , B4 SRI t '` it 1 ,1 i i l j 1 . "1Y , • 4 IZ4!S h1 ' I I• ,1 1 F Al �� �Il�� ['p j .x `,' a ' T., � 113 ,y !‘ � !1 �� i � lejpw1 i [ 1� £d )�V141 g�. l It ��I 1 Xi d 1 ! l a It I(• )A1T it r-7 :71- . .. •,'r.6 L� �C a , ! 2J 1 1 , d iJ P jL7;,1 t f gg L: I:U, iY 1 RR �A 1 FI .1'� rt1I ,251:- 1 1 14:111:71 il ; u-tti. a I �r ; 9 b �"— n ( �I o ^'li - - 1 1 - I) > `k ga ♦ i ill 1 - a1' f ._ .47/4.^-,m___tea. ` I J 'f (1 1 , k� i I41 r'.lrvg1Lk,. � dz ' 1 1( I. kr., Y.i` i ,�e mI {I� IZ 11 i i . L 1 . Q L -= , �4 ,�.� .Ht ; : ,t�l - 1 ;iI 1 I .. i q _1 _KID _ 5 1 & ; 1.1 ; I �I 1 kJ s 1 1'. { 1 L ;I�tit >e � t --1*i „ : tea:=--13 �i . :_......_÷., 3 ~` Th ..H d3[ 5 J, I Ila r �r • L J A,B,&C- 27 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith December 15, 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL•ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 - DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING INC. - A proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District located at the east side of East Avenue, north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793 and Variance DRC2009-00020. Site Characteristics: The project area consists of combining five (5) parcels that result in a rectangular-shaped property, with a combined area of about 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 2,500 feet (east to west) by about 940 feet (north to south). The site is vacant. There are numerous trees within and along the property lines of the individual parcels that comprise the project site. The eastern half of the combined property is mostly low vegetation. To the north of the western half of the project site, there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site, is vacant property where a subdivision for residential lots (Tract 17651) was recently approved. To the west, are additional single-family residences. To the south, is a vacant parcel owned by Caltrans and used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their. facilities further to the east. Beyond this parcel, is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). To the east, are vacant parcels. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, • Etiwanda Specific Plan. The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are about 1,455 feet and 1,400 feet, respectively. A segment of an east to west Community Trail terminates (temporarily) at the southeast corner of a completed residential subdivision (Tract 16116) that is located across the street from the project site (shown as a blue line on the attached exhibit). There are no trails (Local or Community) that link the project site to the existing trails. The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 76 lots for single-family residential development; - the applicant does not intend to construct the homes at this time. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas will range between 21,780 square feet to 36,890 square feet, which are in excess of the minimum of 20,000 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 25,230 square feet, which is in excess of the minimum 25,000 that is required. The depth of each lot will be at least 200 feet, and the width of each lot will meet the required 90-foot dimension. All lots will be conventional, i.e. rectangular in shape, which will allow conventional house plotting. Included in the proposal are several streets, including one that will link East Avenue and an adjacent future residential development at Tract 17651 to the north and the vacant parcel to the east. As the subject property is located within the Equestrian Overlay, each lot will require a dedicated corral area of 24 feet by 24 feet for horse-keeping, and equestrian trails will be provided along the rear of each lot per Section 5.25.500 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Along the north perimeter of the project site, a 20-foot wide Community Trail will be constructed per Figure 5-18 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. From East Avenue to a point approximately 1,200 feet to the east at the north side of Lots 47, 58, 59, 70, and 71, the alignment of the trail will be located entirely within the proposed subdivision. From that point to •the northeast corner of the subject site, the alignment of the trail shifts northward and only 8 feet of the required 20 feet width of the trail, at the north side of Lots 22, 23, 34, 35, and 46, will be within the proposed subdivision; the other 12 feet will be on the neighboring property to the north (Tract 17651). The existing trees throughout the site will be removed as necessary, and new Eucalyptus trees will be EXHIBIT H A,B,&C- 28 • DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18122— DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING INC. • December 15, 2009 Page 2 planted with a spacing of 8 feet on center per Section 5.41.501 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The perimeter wall along the south perimeter of the proposed subdivision, at the south side of Lots 1-16, is proposed to be in excess of 6 feet in height for noise attenuation. The perimeter wall along East Avenue, at the west side of Lots 1 and 71-76, will also be in excess of 6 feet (as seen from within the tract) for the same purpose. This perimeter wall and associated landscaping will be constructed to be consistent with the design shown in Figure 5-28A. At the southwest corner of the site, Etiwanda Specific Plan Figures 5-10 and 5-12 specify that a Neighborhood Entry statement consisting of special tree planting is required; the applicant will improve this area accordingly. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. None. Secondary Issues:' Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 2. None. • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Nicholson Staff Planner: Mike Smith The Committee reviewed the proposed subdivision and accepted it as submitted after concluding that the • design/layout of the tract is standard for this zoning district and area. The Committee, with staff's concurrence, stated that the house product would be reviewed later when the developer of the site submitted the plans; the opportunity for additional comments would occur at that time. There was some discussion regarding the high noise attenuating wall along the perimeter of the site. The Committee observed that this was standard for residential projects along the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). Staff pointed out that the design and construction of the wall would be per Caltrans standard. Mr. Munoz asked staff questions about the hiking and riding trails noting that the Trails Advisory Committee requested several revisions/recommendations. He wanted to know the status of the changes and if the applicant was going to do them. Staff stated that the majority of the changes could be accomplished easily, and that the applicant would do them. The applicant later reiterated that they would incorporate the requested changes. However, there were two recommendations regarding access by • private vehicles and the placement of the Eucalyptus windrow in the Community Trail that needed further discussion with the Engineering and Public Works Departments. The principal concern those A,B,&C- 29 DRC ACTION AGENDA • SUBTT18122 — DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING INC. December 15, 2009 Page 3 departments have is long-term maintenance. Staff stated that the Planning Department will meet with those departments for their input and determine if the recommendations could be accommodated without being contrary to any applicable standards or policies. Staff stated that if these two recommendations could not be incorporated into the design, the applicant could employ alternate solutions that would address the issues raised by the Trails Advisory Committee. Staff indicated that the outcome of the meeting would be summarized in a future memorandum to the Trails Advisory Committee, and a discussion of the recommendations would be incorporated into the staff report that will be prepared for the Planning Commission public hearing. Also, the plans for the tentative tract map will be revised accordingly so that at the public hearing the Commission will have the 'final' draft for their review. • • • • • A,B,&C- 30 1:/) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY • COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2009 @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ACTION I. ROLL CALL: X Frances Howdyshell A Pam Stewart (Alternate) X Lou Munoz • • X Larry Henderson A Janet Ryerson A Kelly Matheny(Alternate) X Francisco Oaxaca X Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) X Don Yoder(Bicycle Member) A Tom Tisler(Bicycle Member Alternate)_ II. NEW BUSINESS • A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING INC.: A proposal to subdivide four(4)vacant parcels • with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, located at the east side of East Avenue, north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210); APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related file: • Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793. Staff Planner: Mike Smith, Associate Planner; Cam Amos, Assistant Engineer Action: The Trails Advisory Committee recommended to the Planning Commission approval of this application subject to the following revisions to be verified by staff: 1. Preserve in-place, where feasible, existing trees that will be within the alignment of the new Community Trail. 2. If acceptable to the Engineering/Public Works Department Design, vehicles (horse trailers, hay deliveries, etc.), shall be able to navigate throughout the network without having to drive in reverse. Where a Local Feeder Trail ends at a Community Trail, vehicles shall be allowed access onto the Community Trail, and the vehicle gate step-through may be eliminated. 3. If acceptable to the Engineering/Public Works Department, acquire an access easement from the developer of Tract 17651 to allow equestrian vehicle access from the Community/Local Feeder Trails. 4. Enlarge the corner 'cut-offs' at the intersection of the north to south and the east to west trails at Lots 15 and 16 so that they are 20 feet by 20 feet(instead of 10 feet by • 10 feet). 5. Provide missing corner 'cut-off' at the right angle turn of the trail, located at Lot 17. EXHIBIT I A,B,&C- 31 TRAILS ADVISOR? COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUETT18122 —DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING, INC. December 9, 2009 Page 2 of 2 • 6. Drainage 'V' ditches shall be no more than 6 inches deep and minimum of 5 feet wide. 7. Provide walls per City standard instead of PVC fencing throughout the trail network within the tract, except along the north side of the Community Trail. 8. Provide PVC fencing at the south side of Lot 76. 9. Increase the width of the trail entrance at Lots 17 and 76 to facilitate vehicle access. 10. install the replacement Eucalyptus windrows in the Community Trail and make part of the Community Trail maintenance. Provide additional width as necessary. 11.Provide striping in the street at all horse crossings. 12. Reduce the length and eliminate interim turnarounds of the east to west trail segments behind Lots 1 and 16. 13.Provide trail signage for the Community Trail at all trail intersections per City standards. B. CONSIDERATION OF NAMING OF A PORTION OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL • THE "RON IVES TRAIL" Requested by Don Yoder Action: Forward to the Planning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Commission, then to City Council. III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION - None • IV. OLD BUSINESS - None V. ADJOURNMENT- 6:50 PM . • A,B,&C- 32 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET • December 9, 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING, INC. - A proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, located at the east side of East Avenue, north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793 and Variance DRC2009 00020. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The project site consists of five(5)parcels that,when combined, form a rectangular property with a combined area of approximately 2,350,000 square feet(53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 2,500 feet(east to west)by approximately 940 feet (north to south). The site is vacant. There are numerous trees within and along the property lines of the individual parcels that comprise the project site. The eastern half of the combined property is mostly low vegetation. To the north of the western half of the project site there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site there is vacant property where a subdivision into residential lots (Tract 17651) was recently approved. To the west are additional single-family residences. To the south is a vacant parcel that is owned by Caltrans and used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this parcel is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). To the east are vacant parcels. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low(VL)Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The subject property is generally level with a south-easterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,455 feet and 1,400 feet, respectively. A segment of an east-west Community Trail terminates (temporarily) at the southeast corner of a completed residential subdivision (Tract 16116)located across the street from the project site(shown as a blue • line on the attached exhibit). There are no trails (Local or Community) that link the project site to existing trails. BACKGROUND: The applicant proposes to construct an east to west segment of the Community Trail along the north perimeter of the project site. This segment will extend from the aforementioned, existing segment to a future segment to the east that will be constructed as part of a residential subdivision that is currently under review(Tentative Tract 18708, shown as a dashed red-line on the attached exhibit). From East Avenue to a point approximately 1,200 feet east, the entire 20-foot width of the Community Trail will be on the subject property. From that point to the northeast corner of the subject site,the alignment of the Community Trail'shifts'northward, and only 8 feet of the required 20 feet width of the trail will be on the subject property,the other 12 feet will be on the neighboring property to the north (Tract 17651). The applicant also proposes a network of a 15-foot wide Local Feeder Trails that will run along the rear property lines of each proposed lot. The proposed trail will provide the future homeowners access to the City's trail network. ANALYSIS: The proposed subdivision is located in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, within the Equestrian Overlay District, which requires the development of Local Feeder Trails(private equestrian easements). The average lot size for the proposed project is 25,230 square feet, which exceeds the Development Code's requirement of 20,000 square feet to keep horses. Horse corral areas with the minimum 24 feet by 24 feet dimensions have been provided and are shown on the Site Plan. Each corral is located a minimum of 70 feet from the potential location of houses-that could be constructed on adjacent properties as required by the Development Code. The Community and Local Feeder Trails will comply with the minimum technical and construction • standards. At every intersection of a trail with a street, and the intersection of a Local Trail and the Community Trail, a widened entry, a gate, and walk-through are proposed per the City standard to Item A A,B,&C- 33 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING, INC. December 9, 2009 Page 2 • control access. The horse corral locations are immediately adjacent to the proposed trail that serves each lot." Along the side of, and parallel to, the trails will be a concrete swale for drainage purposes; these swales will not be within the trail itself and will be within a separate 5-foot wide easement. There are several trees and miscellaneous landscaping within or along the proposed alignment of the Community Trail. Staff believes the trees can remain in-place without interfering with the Equestrian activities and will help maintain a rural character consistent with the Equestrian theme. White PVC trail fencing will be provided. At locations where the trail has no outlet(i.e., a'dead-end' segment), turnarounds have been provided to facilitate reversing the direction(see Lots 1 and 16). At specific locations, the alignment of a trail has been modified to accommodate grade separations and/or potential conflicts with a street intersection (see Lots 1, 76, 16 and 17). RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff requests that the Trails Advisory Committee members review the proposed trail layout and provide input and direction. Staff Planner Mike Smith, Associate Planner Attachments: A— Trails Exhibit B — Copy of Plans • ACTION: The Trails Advisory Committee recommended to the Planning Commission approval of this application subject'to the following revisions to be verified by Staff: 1. Preserve in-place,where feasible,existing trees that will be within the alignment of the • new Community Trail. 2. If acceptable to the Engineering/Public Works Department Design, vehicles (horse trailers, hay deliveries, etc.,) shall be able to navigate throughout the network without having to drive in reverse. Where a Local Feeder Trail ends at a Community Trail, vehicles shall be allowed access onto the Community Trail, and the vehicle gate step-through may be eliminated. 3. If acceptable to the Engineering/Public Works Department,acquire an access easement from the developer of Tract 17651 to allow equestrian vehicle access from the Community/Local Feeder Trails. 4. Enlarge the corner 'cut-offs' at the intersection of the north to south and the east to west trails at Lots 15 and 16 so that they are 20 feet by 20 feet (instead of 10 feet by 10 feet). • 5. Provide missing corner 'cut-off at the right angle turn of the trail, located at Lot 17. 6. Drainage 'V' ditches shall be no more than 6 inches deep and minimum of 5 feet wide. 7. Provide walls per City standard instead of PVC fencing throughout the trail network within the tract, except along the north side of the Community Trail. 8. Provide PVC fencing at the south side of Lot 76. • • A,B;&C- 34 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING, INC. December 9, 2009 • Page 2 9. Increase the width of the trail entrance at Lots 17 and 76 to facilitate vehicle access. 10. Install the replacement Eucalyptus windrows in the Community Trail and make part of the Community Trail maintenance provide additional width as necessary. 11. Provide striping in the street at all horse crossings. 12. Reduce the length and eliminate interim turnarounds of the east to west trail segments behind Lots 1 and 16. 13. Provide trail signage for the Community Trail at all trail intersections per City standards. • • A,B,&C- 35 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY (�a% COMMITTEE AGENDA • WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ACTION I. ROLL CALL: 6:08 PM A Frances Howdyshell x Janet Ryerson x Lou Munoz Kelly Matheny(Alternate) x Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) x Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) x Larry Henderson Don Yoder(Bicycle Member) x Bill Pallotto x Torn Tisler(Bicycle Member Alternate) II. NEW BUSINESS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — • DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING INC.: A proposal to subdivide four(4)vacant parcels with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, located at the east side of East Avenue, north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793 and Variance 2009-00020. Staff Planner: Mike Smith, Associate Planner • Action: The Committee generally accepted the project concept as revised. B. TRAIL PRIORITIES ANNUAL REVIEW DRC2010-00412 (FYR2011-2012) Staff Planner: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner(Oral Presentation) Action: The Committee continued the review to the next meeting. III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION - None IV. OLD BUSINESS - None V. ADJOURNMENT—6:56 PM • A,B,&C- 36 1075, 00F�,!i ..=4:74::•• DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING,INC? • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 1, 2009 DEC 0 2 2009 Mr. Michael Smith City of Rancho Cucamonga RECEIVED ° AI NV G Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: TTM 18122 — Community Outreach Meeting • SUBTT18122, DRC 2006-00793 (DJC#147-001) Dear Mike, This letter represents questions which neighbors asked at our Community Outreach Meeting held on October 15, 2009 at the Foothill High School Library. Those in attendance were Mr. Mike Harrison from Chaffey Joint Union High School, District, you representing the City,myself and six (6) neighbors from the surrounding area. • The following are questions taken from my notes with answers given to the neighbors at the Outreach meeting: • 1. Q: • How will the project be sewered? A: The project will contain on-lot septic and leach field systems. 2. Q: Will there be a wall at the south end of the project? A: Yes. In order to meet the City's General Plan requirements for noise caused by the freeway. The applicant had an acoustical engineering report prepared which shows the need for a concrete block wall at the south boundary line to mitigate the freeway noise. 3. Q: Will East Avenue be widened? A: Yes. In order to meet the City's Secondary Highway Standard the applicant shows East Avenue being widened on the east side of the right- of-way to 44 feet from centerline for a half-section. 4. Q: Are you going to leave the healthy trees on the north side? A: Yes. The Preliminary Tree Removal Plan submitted to the City as an auxiliary plan to the project, shows which trees will remain and which will be removed as referenced in an arborist's report prepared for the project. • EXHIBITJ 09•Lake Forest,CA 92630• (949)586-5778•Fax:(940)586-5527•dtj4'atlglohal.net A,'B,&C- 37 a Mr. Michael Smith ifr. . City of Rancho Cucamonga .klf. December 1, 2009 Page 2 of 3 • 5. 0: What is the intent to build a fence on the north boundary? A: As shown on the Preliminary Grading Plan, a concrete block wall is proposed near the north boundary on the south side of the 20-foot wide community trail. The existing fences (i.e. chain link) located on the north boundary line will not be removed by our project. 6. Q: Will the project be served by natural gas? A: We are not sure at this time. We believe the Gas Company will ultimately extend its nearest line to serve our project and proposed Tract 17651-to the northeast. If individual surrounding owners are interested in gas service instead of propane, they should contact the Gas Company at a time closer to construction of either Tract. 7. Q: Where is the nearest gas line? A: We are not sure. This information can be obtained from the Gas Company. B. Q: Will the electric lines in East Avenue be undergrounded? • - A: Probably. We have not yet contacted Edison regarding this issue. Contact with Edison will be made during preparation of construction/engineering plans. • 9. Q: Will there be parking on the east side of East Avenue once it is widened? A: No. Mike Smith reviewed the preliminary Conditions of Approval and noted a requirement of the developer to post "No Stopping" signs along . East Avenue. 10. Q: Can the"A" Street centerline be lined up with the centerline of Chickasaw? A: The off-set in centerlines has been shown on the proposed plans through • three plan checks by the City and there has been no comment to align the centerlines. However, we will check with the engineering department at the City on this question. 11. Q: How will dust control be handled? A: The Air Quality Management District requires that all grading projects in Southern California control dust through watering. If grading occurs before the construction of water lines, then watering tankers will be brought on-site to control dust. Mike, these are the questions I had in my notes from the Community Outreach. If you • have additional questions from your notes, I'll be glad to update this letter. • • • A,B,&C- 38 Mr. Michael Smith • t l! City of Rancho Cucamonga December 1, 2009 • Page 3 of 3 As you know, none of the neighbors who attended the meeting seemed against the project and some were even wondering if they could "piggy-back" on the utility extensions of sewer, gas and electric for their own homes. Please let me know if you need any additional information from us regarding the Community Outreach Meeting. Sincerely, DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING, INC. 4U f�. /♦ i David T. /.ers, AICP • DTJ;ly • cc. Mr. Mike Harrison, Chaffey Joint Union High School District • • • • • A,B,&C- 39 •STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARrrviscr ~ Date: May 25, 2011 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - A proposal to subdivide four (4) vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Variance 2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VARIANCE DRC2009-00020 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT_- A request to allow perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the maximum wall height permitted in residential.districts, for noise attenuation purposes along the perimeter of a proposed 76-lot • subdivision with a combined area of about 53 acres in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences (Part) and Vacant (Part, Tract 17651); Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Access road for San Bernardino Flood Control District and Foothill Freeway (SR-210) East - Vacant; Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan West - Single-Family Residences (part) and Vacant (Part); Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - 'Very Low Residential South - n/a East - Very Low Residential West - Very Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The project area consists of multiple parcels with a combined area of about • 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 2,500 feet (east to west) by about 940 feet (north to south) (Exhibit B). The site is vacant. There are numerous trees within and along the property lines of the individual parcels that comprise the project site. The EXHIBIT K A,B,&C- 40 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 Page 2 eastern half of the combined property is mostly low vegetation. To the north of the western half of • the project site, there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site, there is vacant property that was recently subdivided into 56 lots and is currently being graded for pending construction of homes (Related file: Tract 17651). To the west are additional single-family residences and a single vacant parcel. To the south is a road used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this road is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). To the east are vacant parcels. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (Exhibit C). The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,455 feet and 1,400 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 76 lots for single-family residential development (Exhibit D). Development/construction of the homes following the subdivision of the property will be by others, as it is not the intent of the applicant to do so themselves. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas will range between 21,780 square feet to 36,890 square feet which are in excess of the minimum of 20,000 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 25,230 square feet which is in excess of the minimum 25,000 that is required. The depth of each lot will be at least 200 feet, and the width of each lot will meet the required 90-foot dimension. All lots will be conventional, i.e. rectangular in shape, which will allow conventional house plotting. Included in the proposal are several streets, including one that will link • East Avenue and adjacent future residential development at Tract 17651 to the north and the vacant parcel to the east. As the subject property is located within the Equestrian Overlay, each lot will have a dedicated corral area of 24 feet by 24 feet for horse-keeping, and equestrian trails will be provided along the rear of each lot per Section 5.25.500 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Along the north perimeter of • the project site, a 20-foot wide Community Trail will be constructed per Figure 5-18 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. From East Avenue to a point approximately 1,200 feet to the east, at the north side of Lots 47, 58, 59, 70, and 71, the alignment of the trail will be located entirely within the proposed subdivision. From that point to the northeast corner of the subject site, the alignment of the trail shifts northward, and only 8 feet of the required 20 feet width of the trail, at the north side of Lots 22, 23, 34, 35, and 46, will be within the proposed subdivision. The other 12 feet will be on the neighboring property to the north (Tract 17651). • B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Etiwanda High School at 9161 Base Line Road on October 16, 2009 (Exhibit J). Several individuals from the surrounding community attended. None of them had any specific objections to the project. Most of the comments were related to off-site improvements as a result of the project including street widening, installation of utilities (natural gas and sewer), undergrounding of existing . power lines, removal of trees, and construction of new walls (including the noise attenuation wall). The applicant answered these questions to the satisfaction of those present. Some of their questions could not be answered because the subject of the inquiry, such as obtaining a connection to a natural gas line, could only be addressed by the applicable utility. There were • concerns about impacts related to construction activity including fugitive dust and noise. Staff stated to the attendees that the applicant's proposal does not include •house product, therefore, • A,B,&C- 41 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 •Page 3 grading would be limited to rough grading, and there would not be any construction activity associated with this application. Nevertheless, there are mitigation measures that must be followed by developers to control dust and noise. Measures to control dust will include the use of a water truck to stabilize soil and prevent it from becoming airborne, ceasing construction during strong winds, and a variety of barriers to prevent water runoff. The principal means to control noise will- be to limit the hours of construction. Staff also noted to the attendees that in the event such measures were not being followed, they could contact the City (or other agencies like the Air Quality Management District) to investigate the problem and, if there is a violation, require the applicant to correct the violation. C. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee (Addington and Miller) and Technical Review Committee reviewed the application on December 15, 2009. The Committees accepted the proposal and recommends approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. D. Design Review Committees: The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Nicholson) reviewed the application on December 15, 2009 (Exhibit H). The Committee reviewed the proposed subdivision and accepted it as submitted after concluding that the design/layout of the tract is standard for the zoning district and area of the project site. The height of the noise attenuating walls was identified as standard for residential projects along the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). Staff indicated that the design and construction of the wall would be per Caltrans standard. The Committee noted that the house product would be reviewed later when the • developer of the site submitted the plans and that the opportunity for additional comments would occur at that time. The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. E. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the application on December 9, 2009 (Exhibit)). In general, the Committee reviewed the proposed subdivision and. accepted it as submitted with several relatively minor revisions including enlarging the corner cut-offs at trail intersections, providing block walls along the perimeter of trails throughout the subdivision (instead of PVC fencing), and providing safety/identification signs and striping. The Committee also requested that staff research two (2) significant revisions relating to the proposed 20-foot wide Community Trail. The first was the possibility of allowing horse-keeping related vehicles access to the trail, i.e. drive on it, to facilitate the movement of such vehicles in a forward-facing direction through the trail system. The second was the planting of the replacement Eucalyptus windrow in order to enhance the aesthetics along the trail on the north side of the • proposed north perimeter wail of the subdivision that will be located adjacent and parallel to the trail. Staff discussed the requests with the Engineering and Public Works Departments, and it was determined that neither request could be accommodated. The first request could not be granted as a) there was a potential for safety to be compromised because of motorized vehicles sharing the same path of travel as pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian traffic, b) the surface of the trail was not designed to support such traffic and would be subject to damage, and c) motorized vehicles are not permitted on the Community Trail system anywhere else in the City. The second request could not be granted as long-term maintenance including tree pruning and watering would become the sole • responsibility of the City. At a follow-up meeting with the Committee on September 8, 2010, alternate solutions were discussed. The Committee agreed to the two following solutions: 1) to address the first request, hammerhead turnarounds would be provided at the north ends of each A,B,&C- 42 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122— CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 Page 4 • north to south segment of Local Trails that intersect with the Community Trail to permit vehicles to reverse direction (these will match the turnarounds near the east and west termini of the east to west trail along the south perimeter of the subdivision), and 2) to address the second request, the Eucalyptus windrow would be planted adjacent and parallel to the Local Trail and-wall that will be located along the south perimeter of the subdivision. At this meeting, there was additional discussion regarding the wall along the rear of each property and its design. The applicant and the Committee agreed that the wall would be comprised of a solid lower portion constructed of decorative blocks and an open upper portion constructed of rod iron fencing. These solutions and the Committee's other conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. F. Variance DRC2009-00020: The applicant has submitted a Variance to allow the construction of noise attenuating walls along the south, east, and west perimeters of the proposed subdivision that will be in excess of 6 feet in height (Exhibit F). Noise attenuation walls were identified as the principal means for mitigating noise impacts generated by traffic on East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) according to the noise study prepared by Mestre Greves Associates on October 9, 2008. Per Section 17.08.060(K) of the Development Code; the maximum height of walls permitted in residential districts is 6 feet. The proposed walls will be approximately 6 to 15.5 feet above the pad elevations of the lots adjoining the walls as seen from the interior of the subdivision. Depending on the location, some walls will be constructed over retaining walls, i.e. a combination wall. Therefore, as seen from the outside, the height of the walls will be greater. The general area where the walls will be highest is near the southeast corner of the subdivision at Lot 16 where the wall, as seen from the freeway, will be approximately 22 feet high. • Facts For Findings: The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards. In order to grant a request for a Variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings. Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property. The following are facts to support the necessary findings: 1. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code. Facts: The proposed walls are for noise attenuation purposes to reduce the exterior noise levels at the lots along the perimeter of the proposed subdivision. The height of the walls is necessary to mitigate the noise impacts to a level that is less than 65 dBA CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) as specified in the Development Code. If the walls were limited to 6 feet as specified in the Code, or if the walls were absent altogether, the exterior noise levels would not comply with the Code nor be consistent with Public Health and Safety policies relating to noise (Goal PS-13 of the General Plan). There is no practical alternative to walls that will achieve the desired noise attenuation. 2. Finding : That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Facts: The project site is located approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway • (SR-210) at the east side of East Avenue. As a result, it is exposed to noise generated by traffic that is generally not present near other residential properties in A,B,&C- 43 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 Page 5 the City which are screened by existing development and/or sufficiently distant from these principal noise sources that noise impacts are negligible. 3. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Fact/s: The purpose of the walls is to attenuate traffic noise. The exterior noise levels generated by traffic exceed the maximum limits established by the Development Code and would negatively affect a future homeowner's ability to enjoy and use the outdoor areas of his property in the absence of these walls. Furthermore, the effectiveness of noise attenuating materials used in the construction of the homes is augmented by the presence of the noise attenuating perimeter wall. The absence of the wall would reduce the effectiveness of noise mitigation measures and expose the occupants of the homes to elevated interior noise. 4. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact/s: The Foothill Freeway (SR-210) corridor within the City is adjacent to numerous residential properties. Traffic noise impacts along the corridor must be mitigated to levels as described in the Development Code and consistent with the General • Plan. The freeway corridor abuts various residential zoning districts including the Very Low (VL) Residential District. Walls of this height, or similar are common along the freeway corridor for noise attenuation purposes where residential properties are adjacent to the freeway. 5. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact/s: The height of the walls as seen from East Avenue will be 6 feet and will not be adjacent to any private property. In addition to appearing to have the typical height of a perimeter wall, the wall, along with associated landscaping, will be constructed per the decorative design shown in Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The height of the wall as seen from the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) will be similar to the height of other noise attenuation walls along the freeway corridor within the City. This wall will be constructed per the decorative design established by Caltrans. The properties adjacent to the wall along the east perimeter of the proposed subdivision are vacant. This wall will be constructed of decorative block per the City's Design Guidelines. Upon development of the properties to the east of Lots 17 - 22, any residential structures, in compliance with the minimum rear yard setback standard, will be at least 60 feet from the wall. The lot immediately to the east of Lot 16 will likely have a matching pad elevation when it is developed to match the proposed subdivision (for grading, street alignment, and drainage purposes). Therefore, the retaining portion of the wall (approximately 7.5 feet in height) as seen from this lot would be buried, reducing the visible height of the wall. a. Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224: The existing trees throughout the site will be removed as necessary, and a replacement Eucalyptus tree windrow will be planted with a spacing of 8 feet on A,B,&C- 44 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 Page 6 • center per Section 5.41.501 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of these trees. A set of replacement Eucalyptus windrows will be planted along the entire south perimeter and part of the east perimeter of the subdivision (Exhibit G). Originally, the windrow was to be installed along the north perimeter of the subdivision but was relocated to address the revisions requested by the Trails Advisory Committee, as noted above. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, Staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to biological resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, and air quality, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, Staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 and • Variance DRC2009-00020 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. 77iubmtheJJaTroyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Conceptual Master Plan/Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 - Exhibit E - Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit F - Preliminary Wall and Fence Plan . Exhibit G - Preliminary Tree Removal and Windrow Replacement Plan Exhibit H - Design Review Committee Action Comments (December 15, 2009) Exhibit I - Trails Advisory Committee Action Comments (December 9, 2009 and December 8, 2010) Exhibit J - Neighborhood Meeting Summary (prepared by the Applicant] Exhibit K - Initial Study Parts I and II • Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2009-00020 A,B,&C- 45 South Coast • Air Quality Manac ement District �„ 9f 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-41 78 r'1"sn-t, (909) 396-2000 • www.agmd.gov E-Mailed: May 25, 2011 May 25, 2011 michael.smith@cityofrc.us Cif'`OF RANCHO CUCAVONGA Mr. Mike Smith Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga SAY 31 2011 P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 EC EPFD tti iNG Review of the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft MND) for the Proposed Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 Project • The South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above-mentioned document. The following comments are meant as guidance for the lead agency and should be incorporated into the final environmental document as appropriate. The AQMD staff is concerned that the lead agency has not demonstrated that the proposed project'will have less than significant air quality impacts absent a health risk assessment and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analysis for the project. Specifically, the lead agency should quantify the potential health risk impacts to future sensitive receptors (i.e., residents) at the project site which is located only 135 feet away from the 210 Freeway. The 210 Freeway is a potentially significant source of toxic air pollutants due to the approximate 153,000 vehicles per day that travel along this section. Consistent with the CARB Land Use Handbooks the lead agency should include mitigation in the final CEQA document that precludes any sensitive land uses within 500 feet of the 210 Freeway. Further, AQMD staff recommends that pursuant to Section 15064.4 of the CEQA Guidelines; "the lead agency should make a good faith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data, to describe, calculate or estimate the amount of GHG emissions resulting from a project." Therefore, the lead agency should revise the CEQA document to include a HRA and GHG emissions analysis. In the event that the California Air Resources Board. April 2005. "Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective." Accessed at: http://www.arb.ca.eov/ch/landuse.htm • EXHIBIT L - A,B,&C- 46 - • Mr. Mike Smith 2 May 25, 2011 • lead agency's revised CEQA document demonstrates significant adverse air quality • impacts the lead agency should require mitigation pursuant to Section 15071 and/or 15092 of the CEQA Guidelines. Details regarding these comments are attached to this letter. AQMD staff is available to work with the lead agency to address these issues and any other questions that may arise. Please contact Dan Garcia, Air Quality Specialist CEQA Section, at (909) 396-3304, if you have any questions regarding the enclosed comments. Sincerely, 2 vanes Ian MacMillan Program Supervisor, CEQA Inter-Governmental Review • Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources Attachment IM:DG SBC110429-02 Control Number • • • • A,B,&C- 47 Mr. Mike Smith 3 May 25, 2011 • Potential Health Risk Impacts to Sensitive Land Uses Based on the lead agency's discussion regarding toxic air contaminant (Section 5.3) of the Air Quality Analysis Report in the draft MND the proposed project includes sensitive land uses (i.e., residences) within 500 feet of the 210 Freeway. As a result, the AQMD staff is concerned about the potential health risk impacts from toxic air pollutants emitted by the significant volume of traffic that would travel in close proximity to these homes. The lead agency relies on the use of air filters with a minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) of 12 placed in residential HVAC systems to mitigate the project's health risk impacts from the 210 Freeway below the significance level. While these filters can be effective against particulate pollution they do not have the ability to remove a wide variety of gaseous pollutants (i.e., NOx, TAC's and VOC's) • associated with traffic-related pollution. These filters also have no effectiveness on outdoor activities associated with residential uses and require long term and potentially costly maintenance. Lastly, without quantifying the level of potential air quality impacts from the freeway, nor the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures, the lead agency has not demonstrated that this impact is less than significant. Therefore, AQMD staff recommends that the lead agency maintain the 500-foot buffer specified in the CARB Land Use Handbook for any new residential project built close to a freeway. • Quantification of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions 2. The AQMD staff is concerned that the lead agency has failed to calculate GHG emissions impacts from the proposed project. AQMD staff refers the lead agency to Section 15064.4 of the CEQA guidelines which requires that the lead agency "make a good faith effort"to quantify the GHG eniissions'impacts from the proposed project. Further, AQMD staff notes that based on the technical information provided in the Air Quality Analysis Report provided with the MND the lead agency has adequate technical information (e.g.,type of construction equipment, hours of equipment operation, material delivery trips, energy consumption, vehicle miles traveled, etc.)to calculate the GHG emissions impacts from the proposed project. Therefore, AQMD staff requests that the lead agency revise the CEQA document to include a quantitative analysis of greenhouse gases, a determination of significance, and, if necessary, feasible mitigation measures. Either the URBEMIS 20072 or CaIEEMod3 land use software model can be used to quantify these potential impacts and mitigation measures. 2 The URBEM1S 2007 Software Model can be found at: http://www.urbemis.com/ • 3 The CalEEMod Software Model can be found at: htto://www.caleemod.com/ A,B,&C- 48 • uLIhat!' California Natural Resources Agency EDMUND G.BROWN,JR. Governor 11-r4u1=iy DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME JOHN MCCAMMAN,Director http://www.dfq.ca.qov Inland Deserts Region 3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-200 • Ontario, CA 91764 (909)484-0167 May 25, 2011 Mike Harrison Chaffey Joint Union High School District 211 West Fifth Street, Ontario, CA 91762 Re: Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT1B122 Dear Mr. Harrison: The Department of Fish and Game (Department) appreciates this opportunity to comment on the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122. The Department is responding as a Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources [Fish and Game Code sections 711.7 and 1802 and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA) section 15386] and as a Responsible Agency regarding any discretionary actions (CEQA Guidelines section 15381), such as a Lake and Streambed • Alteration Agreement (Section 1600 of seq.) or a California Endangered Species Incidental Take Permit (Fish and Game Code Sections 2080 and 2080.1). The Department is also responsible for ensuring appropriate conservation of fish and wildlife resources including rare, threatened, and endangered plant and animal species, pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act(Fish and Game Code Sections 2080 and 2080.1). The proposed project consists of the subdivision of five (5) parcels into 76 lots. The site is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino and is bounded on the south by the 210 freeway, on the west by residential development and on the north and east by open space There are two project description components that require clarification: 1) a discrepancy in the number of residential lots, and, 2)whether the project was submitted to the State Clearinghouse for circulation. The Notice of Intent sheet states that there are four parcels and the Environmental checklist form initial study states that there are five parcels.Also, number 12 of the first part of the environmental information form states that there are 85 lots proposed, not 76. The document does not include a State Clearinghouse Number. Please clarify whether this MND was submitted to the State Clearinghouse for distribution. • Conserving CaCifornia's Wildl fe Since 1870 EXHIBITM A,B,&C- 49 Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino Page 2 of 4 After reviewing the CEQA document, the Department recommends that the document be • recirculated addressing the issues raised in this letter. Project Impacts and Mitigation A biological assessment was conducted in July 2005 and focused surveys for San. Bernardino Kangaroo rat and coastal California gnatcatcher were performed in August and October of 2005. The document also states that a biological assessment was prepared in 2011. The MND document did not include the biological reports or a list of species found on the site and the Department cannot make an accurate evaluation of the biological resources on the site,the project impacts on biological resources and an assessment of mitigation measures without them. These reports should be included in a recirculated document. The Department recommends that any biological habitat assessments or walkovers be conducted within a year of distribution of the CEQA document. A thorough assessment of rare plants and rare natural communities, following the Department's November 2009 guidance for Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Natural Communities. The guidance document can be found at the following link: htto://www dfo ca.00v/biooeodata/arddb/odfs/Protocols fqr Survevino and Evaluating Imoacts,odf Habitat assessments that identify the possibility of listed, threatened or endangered plants or animals should also provide an analysis of critical habitat and the results of any focus surveys in the CEQA document. The document should also address State and Federal listed species of special concern. CEQA documents that rely on future surveys or regulatory compliance (with the exception of pre-construction surveys for bun-owing owl or bird nests) • as mitigation may not satisfy the Department's obligations under CEQA and may require future supplemental documents processed via CEQA. The document cites two figures for Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS), 9 acres. and 2.9 acres. The document needs to clarify the discrepancy in the figures. The document needs to clarify when the trapping surveys for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat were conducted and when surveys were conducted for the coastal California gnatcatcher. If the surveys were not conducted within one year and were not done according to survey protocol then the Department recommends that the updated survey results be included in a subsequent document. • The project potentially involves the presence of a Federal threatened or endangered species. In the event that updated surveys disclose the presence of a threatened or endangered species, the project applicant will have to consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Service). If the impacts and mitigation from the Service are not included in the CEQA document, a subsequent CEQA document may have to be prepared and reviewed by the Department. • The project will result in the removal of 2.9 or 9 acres of RAFSS. RAFSS is included in the Department's "Sensitivity of Top Priority Rare Natural Communities in Southern California" as a S1.1 "very threatened" community. A 1997 document entitled "Classification of Alluvial Scrub in Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties" characterizes RAFSS as a "distinctive and rare plant community" that was present in alluvial fans and streams of Riverside and San Bernardino County but is now restricted to scattered • A,B,&C- 50 Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino Page 3 of 4 • fragments due to urbanization and alteration of the natural hydrology of Southern California river and stream systems. The Department cannot determine what the impact of this project on biological resources will be because neither species lists nor biological surveys were included with the document. For this reason the Department cannot assess whether the mitigation measures included in the document are adequate to offset the impacts of the project. The primary mitigation measures were replacement of RAFSS on a 1:1 ratio and the transplantation of Plummer's mariposa lily. The document needs to clarify the acreage figure for RAFSS (9 acres or 2.9 acres), provide the Department with the relevant biological reports, clarify the dates when focused surveys were conducted, indicate whether the site is located within critical habitat for the SBKR or CCGn, provide the results of a burrowing owl survey, an analysis of direct, indirect, temporary and permanent impacts to biological resources, and mitigation measures or project changes to offset the loss of sensitive species and habitats. The document also needs to cite possible mitigation areas and provide an equivalency analysis for the Department's approval. The Department prefers that impacts on the Etiwanda Fan are mitigated on the Etiwanda Fan. Streambed Alteration Agreements The jurisdictional wetland delineation from 2006 was not included with the MND. The Department recommends that an updated wetland delineation be conducted and included in • a subsequent CEQA document. The CEQA document does not fully identify potential impacts to lakes, streams, and associated resources and provide adequate avoidance, mitigation, monitoring, funding sources, a habitat management plan and reporting commitments. Additional CEQA documentation will be required prior to execution (signing) of the Agreement. In order to avoid delays or repetition of the CEQA process, potential impacts to a stream or lake, as well as avoidance and mitigation measures need to be discussed within this CEQA document. The Department opposes the elimination of drainages, lakes and their associated habitats. The Department recommends avoiding the stream and riparian habitat to the greatest extent possible. Any unavoidable impacts need to be compensated with the creation and/or restoration of in-kind habitat either on-site or off-site at a minimum 3:1 replacement-to- impact ratio, depending on the impacts and proposed mitigation. Additional mitigation requirements through the Department's Streambed Alteration Agreement process may be required depending on the quality of habitat impacted, proposed mitigation, project design, and other factors. We recommend submitting a notification early on, since modification of the proposed project may be required to avoid or reduce impacts to fish and wildlife resources. To obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement notification package, please refer to the Department's intemet web site. • . A,B,&C- 51 Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino Page 4 of 4 The following information will be required for the processing of a Streambed Alteration • Agreement and the Department recommends incorporating this information to avoid subsequent CEQA documentation and project delays: 1) Delineation of lakes, streams, and associated habitat that will be temporarily and/or permanently impacted by the proposed project (include an estimate of impact to each habitat type); 2) Discussion of avoidance measures to reduce project impacts; and, 3) Discussion of potential mitigation measures required to reduce the project impacts to a level of insignificance. Section 15370 of the CEQA guidelines includes a definition of mitigation. It states that mitigation includes: 1) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action, 2) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, 3) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment, 4) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action, 5) Compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. In the absence of specific mitigation measures in the CEQA documents, the Department • believes that it cannot fulfill its obligations as a Trustee and Responsible Agency for fish and wildlife resources. Permit negotiations conducted after and outside of the CEQA process deprive the public of its rights to know what project impacts are and how they are being mitigated in violation of CEQA Section 15002. Also, because mitigation to offset the impacts was not identified in the CEQA document, the Department does not believe that the Lead Agency can make the determination that impacts to jurisdictional drainages and/or riparian habitat are "less than significant" without knowing what the specific impacts and mitigation measures are that will reduce those impacts. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. Please contact Robin Maloney-Rames at (909) 980-3818, if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, i 41111P Iris ►a Je : -ndt,\ . Se i r Environmental Scientist . 4 al A,B,&C- 52 California Regional Water Quality Control oard Santa Ana Region ,) Fu4=+ 3737 Main Street,Suite 500,Riverside.California 92501-3348 inda S.Adams Phone(951)782-4130• FAX(951)781-6288 Edmund G.Brawn Jr. Acting Secretaryfor www.waterboards.ca gov/santaana Governor Environmental Protection CITY OF RANCHO Ct1CWIMIONGA May 24, 2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept. mg 25 2011 P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RECEIVED : PANNING NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122, RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - APPLICABILITY OF SWRCB WATER QUALITY ORDER NO. 2004-0004- DWQ Dear City Planning,Department: Staff of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) have reviewed the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Notice of Intent and Initial Study (IS) to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for Tentative Tract Map SUBTr18122 (Project; TTM No.18122). The Project would subdivide a rectangular 53-acre parcel into 76 residential lots, located on the east side of East Avenue and north of Interstate 210. The.applicant is Chaffey Joint Union High School District. • We believe that the MND should incorporate the following comments in order for the Project to best protect water quality standards (water quality objectives and beneficial uses) contained in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin (Region 8 Basin Plan, 1995, as amended): The MND (p.11-12) states that the onsite north-south trending alluvial fan drainage constitutes 0.06 acre of waters of the state and is jurisdictional to the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), and likely jurisdictional to the Regional Board. Pg. 11 states that the drainage is not jurisdictional to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), though that is contradicted by the Project Information Description (pg. 2 and 3 of 12; front of the MND). The drainage has discernable bed and bank features is tributary to the Victoria Basin, which overflows with high sedimentation to the Etiwanda Flood Control Channel (Google Earth). Therefore, we request that the City obtain clarification directly from USACOE regarding 1) drainage connectivity, and 2) any need for a Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Water Quality Certification. We emphasize that impacts to water quality standards of all surface waters, including the onsite drainage, must be avoided whenever possible. For example, the Project could practice avoidance by integrating the drainage as a naturally vegetated feature (paseo): Where avoidance imposes unreasonable constraints on development, unavoidable impacts to water quality standards must be minimized with in-kind mitigation (beyond simply the acquisition of permits) that at a minimum, replaces the full water quality function and value of the water quality • standards that existed prior to impact. EXH I B I T N CalifornicW vironmental Protection Agency A,B,&C7t-e`Y53i P°Per City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning -2 - May 24, 2011 _ If the USACOE does not take jurisdiction for proposed impacts to these waters by requiring a CWA Section 404 Permit, then the Regional Board will take jurisdiction through the issuance • of general waste discharge requirements under its authority pursuant to the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (California Water Code or CWC). Depending on the acreage, cubic yards, and linear feet impacted, the Project may be eligible for enrollment in the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Water Quality Order No. 2004-004-DWQ, Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Dredged or Fill Discharges to Waters Deemed by the USACOE to be Outside of Federal Jurisdiction (General WDRs). These General WDRs are restricted to dredge or fill discharges not exceeding two-tenths (0.200) of an acre, 400 linear feet, and 50 cubic yards, and are available online: www.waterboards.ca.gov/board decisions/adopted orders/water quality/2004/wqo/wgo2004- 0004.pdf We request that the final Mitigated Negative Declaration include a jurisdictional ruling from USACOE on the Project, while including a determination of the proposed impacted area and cubic yards involved, for comparison to the above criteria. If the impacted area and cubic yards are within these criteria and found to not be jurisdictional to the USACOE, and will not be avoided, then the Project applicant is required to apply for these General WDRs. To obtain coverage under these General WDRs, submittal of the following is required: 1) A Notice of Intent (NOI; see Attachment 1 of Enclosure 2) to enroll under the General WDRs; 2) A filing fee based upon a review of a comprehensive estimate of affected acreage, linear feet, and cubic yards excavated. This fee, payable to "State Water Resources Control Board," can be determined using the fee calculator at: • http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/cwa401/index.shtml ; 3) A mitigation plan for additional vegetation (native species only) or natural stabilization of the channel, or one that determines alternative mitigation; and 4) A copy of the City's Notice of Determination (NOD) of an adopted document that accurately identifies environmental impacts pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). We anticipate that the NOD for the final MND would suffice. Pursuant to CWC Sections 13260 and 13263(a),(i)), it is the applicant's responsibility to submit to the Regional Board a Report of Waste Discharge (ROWD), with proposed mitigation, at least 45 days before the planned discharge to the site's water body. The completed Notice of Intent (NOI) of these General WDRs serves the purpose of an ROWD. If you have any questions, please contact Glenn Robertson at (951) 782-3259, grobertsonewaterboards.ca.gov, or me at (951) 782-3234, or madelson( waterboards.ca.gov Sincerely, -- - Mark G. Adelson, Chief Regional Planning Programs Section. • cc: State Clearinghouse City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept_D.Kendren/Brad Buller/Steve.Fowler U.S Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles—Jason Lambert California Department of Fish and Game,Ontario—Michael D. Flores • Chaney Joint Union High School District Mike Harrison, mike_harrison @cjuhsd.net X:Groberts on Magnolia/Data/CEOA/CEOA Responses/Gen WDRs,Small Sites Permit—SUBTT 18122, Rancho Cucamonga.doc Californitd zvironmental Protection Agency Recycled Paper A,B,&C- 54 • • "ic, µ- ��} DEPARTMENT OF THE \RM1` i t •,o r a,.... yw LOS ANGELES DISTRICT CORPS or ENGINEERS pA I .TIES LE rd P.O.BOX 5S272.1 LOS ANGEL ES%CALGDRNIA 90052-2325 February 24, 2011 Regulatory Division i"!ike Harrison Chatty join; Union High School District 211 West Fifth Street Ontario. California 92762 SUBJECT: Approved Jurisdictional Determination regarding presence/absence of geographic jurisdiction Sv r ( /8f2e ` DEC2o• 0,Q33 Dear Mr. Harrison: U Reference is made to your request(File No.SPL-2010-00232-SL.P)dated March 12, 2010, tun an approved Department of the Army jurisdictional determination(ID) for the East Avenue Property Residential Project site(-117.5(1992$ 24.138604) located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. San Bernardino County, Califiarnia (maps enclosed). • As)ou may know, the Corps'evaluation process ess for determining whether or not.a Department of the Army permit is needed involves two tests. If both tests are met. then a permit is required. The first test determines whether or not the proposed project is located in a water of the united States(i.e., it is within the Corps'geographic jurisdiction). The second test determines whether or not the proposed project is a regulated activity under Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. As part of the evaluation process, pertaining to the first test only, we have made the jurisdictional determination below. Based on available information, we have determined there are no jurisdictional waters of the United States on the project site, in the locations depicted on the enclosed drawing. The aquatic resource identified as "Drainage 1" is a water without a significant nexus to a downstream Traditionally Navigable Water. As such, this water is not currently regulated by the Corps of Engineers. The basis for our determination can be found in the enclosed TD forms. This disclaimer of jurisdiction is only for Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Other Federal, State, and local laws may apply to your activities in particular, you may need authorization from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, the California Department of Fish and Game.and/or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Set-trice. This letter contains an approved iurisdictional determination for the East Avenue Property Residential Project site. If von object to this decision, you may treaties: an administrative appeal.under Corps regulations at.33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process(!KAP) tact sheet (Appendix A) and Request for Appeal (RFA) • EXHIBIT 0 &C 55 . S( berm p? , �2c2o� ‘ N i. • -2- form. If you request to appeal this decision you must submit a completed RFA form to the Corps South Pacific Division Office at the following address: Tom Cavanaugh Administrative Appeal Review Officer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers South Pacific Division,CESPD-PDS-O,2042B 1455 Market Street,San Francisco,California 94103-1399 In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps,the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal under 33 C.F.R.Part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date on the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by April 24,2011. It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division office if you do not object to the decision in - this letter. This verification is valid for five years from the date of this letter,unless new information warrants revision of the determination before the expiration date. If you wish to submit new information regarding the approved jurisdictional determination for this site, please submit this information to Shannon Pankratz at the letterhead address by April 24,2011. The Corps will consider any new information so submitted and respond within 60 days by either revising the prior determination,if appropriate, or reissuing the prior determination. A revised or • reissued jurisdictional determination can be appealed as described above. This determination has been conducted to identify the extent of the Corps'Clean Water Act jurisdiction on the particular project site identified in your request. This determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work. If you have any questions,please contact Shannon Pankratz at 213.452.3412 or via e-mail at Shannon.L.PankratzC4usace.army.miL Please be advised that you can now comment on your experience with Regulatory Division by accessing the Corps web-based customer survey form at http://per2.nwp.usace.army.mil/survey.html. Sincerely, Le Aaron O.Allen, Ph.D. V Chief, North Coast Branch Regulatory Division Enclosures • A,B,&C- 56 sEP dla cr. 40 ENVIRONMENTAL sy, INFORMATION FORM • `S� -` (Part I - Initial Study) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planning Division (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form ns to inform thie Ctty of4he basic components of the proposed project lso that the Petty may review=the,project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances', and ; Guidelines, °the California ;Environmental Quality Act, and the Citylsb§Rules and ,, , i x4r ii, y t f 'L q�ul..l qtr r CL .i x-<.v,' _. Procedures to implementiCEQA. ThISrtimportanttthatlthe information requested mgthisi apphcation begprovided in fu11 , -, g, Ski 7 , " y, rr.t r.'lr . >a' GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application Is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for.the project to which this form pert•If--- ' `M$ "2' , 'k' ; O>3:bg T$3,zr .• -- +a. uapstil2M/ £. 1 ' . Tw �:dr! 3 '..e '17220 •ooeen 2:4„..,-.J, kk .. Project Title: Tentative Tract Map 18122 • Name &Address of project owner(s): Chaffey Joint Union High School District 211 West Fifth Street, Ontario, CA 91762 Name &Address of developer or project sponsor Chaffey Joint Union High School District, 211 West Fifth Street, Ontario, CA 91762 (Contact: Mike Harrison) 909-988-8511 Contact Person &.Address: Engineer/Representative David Jeffers Consulting, Inc. (Contact: Dave Jeffers) 949-586-5778 19 Spectrum Pointe Dr., Ste 609 Lake Forest, CA 92630 • Name &Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): David Jeffers Consulting, Inc. and with Luke Evans, Assistant Project Manager Michael Brandman Associates •621 East Carnegie Drive, San Bernardino, CA 92408 Telephone Number.. 909-884-2255 E XI-I I B I T P Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 1 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM A,B,&C- 57 PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: • Information indicated by an asterisk(*) is not required of non-construction CUP'S-unless otherwise requested by staff • '1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): • The project is located at the northeast corner of East Avenue and the 210 freeway. SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 28, Township 1N, Range 6W, on the USGS Cucamonga Peak 7.5 minute quadrangle. See Exhibit 1, Regional Location Map, Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity USGS Map, and Exhibit 3, Local Vicinity Aerial Map. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 0225-191-03, 0225-191-04, 0225-191-13, 0225-191-15, 0225-191-20 *5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 52.3 acres *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets&proposed • dedications): 52.3 acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): Project site is currently zoned for Very Low Density Residential (up to 2 du/acre)within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed project would not require any alteration to this designation. 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: 1) Tree Removal Permit, 2) Rough Grading Permit, 3) Precise Grading Permit, 4)Wall Permit, and 5) Building Permit 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information(i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, - biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The project site is currently vacant land. The western two-thirds of the site (approximately 45 acres) is • composed of abandoned agricultural properties and ruderal vegetation that is regularly disked for weed abatement. A few rows of mature eucalyptus trees run through the site, as does a grid of unimproved dirt tracks (see Exhibit 3, Local Vicinity Aerial Map, and Exhibit 4, Site Photographs). The eastern portion of the site (approximately.a4 ores) is composed of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) in TTM18122 East Avenue Environm tal Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 2 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM 2 .9 •A,B,&C- 58 moderately undisturbed condit ut i. ( ET1E-2 inCP FCUPP Y ' , 2.0(( ine pef kJ) JURtVrncnoks , 144rne • iN •sf€ • The site is relatively fl . There are no trails, dedicated roads, scenic aspects, or structures on the property. Approxi ely 0.05 acres of USACE and CDFG jurisdictional areas occur in the east-central portion of the site. The applicant's geologist, Leighton and Associates, has determined that the site is suitable for development. The site does not lie within an Earthquake Fault Zone. The depth to groundwater beneath the site is approximately 200 to 300 feet below surface. Soils consist of 2.1 unconsolidated deposits of coarse-grained sand to bouldery alluvium. A Habitat Assessment and focused surveys for San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) and Coast California Gnatcatcher(CAGN)was performed. Neither species was encountered on site. Plu er's Mariposa lily, a California Native Plant Society List 1B species was observed. Approximately...ciae—acres of Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) is located on the eastern portion of the project site. Proposed offsite mitigation is recommended for both the Plummer's Mariposa lily and the RAFSS habitat. Project reports and studies performed include: 1) Habitat Assessment perfomed by MBA (07/2005), 2) CAGN and SBKR focused surveys performed by MBA (09/04/2005 and 10/21/2005), 3) Delineation of Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands performed by MBA (08/03/2006), 4) Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment performed by MBA(02/07/2007), 5) Geotechnical Study performed by Leighton and Associates (04/26/2006), 6) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by Winzler& Kelly (04/14/2006), and 7) Noise Constraints Analysis performed by Mestre Greve Associates (February, 2007). and 8) Tree Survey and Arborist Report performed by MBA (05/15/2007). . All of the above-referenced reports are included with this application. • • 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information (books,published reports and oral history): The project site has historically been used for agricultural purposes. A Cultural Resources Assessment was prepared for the site by Michael Brandman Associates, and is included with this submittal. This assessment has determined that impacts to prehistoric cultural resources is unlikely. • • 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: • TTM78122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 3 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM A,B,&C- 59 State Route 210 runs adjacent to the southern boundary of the project site. A 20-foot high earthen berm separates the site from the freeway on the western half of the site, as illustrated in Exhibit 4, Site Photographs. This berm attenuates traffic noise coming from the freeway. The eastern portion of the site, however, contains no berm, and the freeway is level with the project property. • A Noise Constraint Analysis was performed by Mestre Greve Associates and is included with this submittal. The study found that noise from the freeway and from East Avenue could be mitigated to meet City standards with the installation of noise barriers and/or residential construction building upgrades. The construction of noise barriers and the extent of building upgrades would be specified and incorporated into the project's plans prior to the issuance of building permits. With the inclusion of these mitgation measures, impacts to the project from offsite noise would be reduced to less than significant. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: 76' The proposed development is being processed under the VL Zone in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and Design Guidelines. The project would createesidential lots on approximately 54 acres. See Exhibit 5, Conceptual Land Use Plan, for an overview of the project. Minimum lot size would flk t'(i-c.) be2ckgeetT, and maximum lot size would be,3Z,�64s(• with an average lot size of 7 sf. The site is hovered by an equestrian overlay, and would pr vide rear yard equestrian access and inkages to the Community Trail System. The project would fr nt on East Avenue, with primary acc s via Street"A." An additional access point would be via Street"F which would tie in with TTM 17651 i ediately north of the project site. A preliminary development phas g plan has been prepared and is incl ded with this application. The entitlement process is expe ted to begin with the submittal of this pplication package in May 2007. As the owner and "developer" is haffey Joint Union High School Distri t the project is requried to be sold to a developer or homebu der entity after tentative map approv . The time line and schedule for this action cannot be determined t this time. 3C f(161p 25", 2)0 • • • 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): Four parcels to the immediate north vary in size from two to five acres with one residence per property. • • Also north of the site lies TTM 17651, currently vacant land and recently approved for development of 56 Very Low Residential lots of 20,000 sf minimum. East of the property is vacant land and beyond that is the Etiwanda Flood Control Channel. The southem boundary of the site is flanked by a one-lane access road, a concrete-lined drainage channel, and SR-210 freeway. The western boundary of the site is TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Fonn.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 4 of 5 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM A,B,&C- 60 defined by East Avenue, with V y Low Residential lots on the west side of bit street similar to that described above. • // i6 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding gQneral area of the project? The proposed project will convert approximately 54 acres of vacant land int Ilquestrian-oriented residential lots with private feeder and community trails. The new development would be consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and would also be consistent with existing and recently approved development in the area. . 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing are proposed? • Short term noise would be anticipated from residential construction activities primarily related to grading and construction of underground utilities/storm drain facilities and would be temporary in nature. Long term noise would be most pronounced from SR-210 to the south. Earthern berms, sound walls, and other mitigation measures as noted in the Noise Constraint Analysis would reduce onsite noise levels to below City standards. The sound attenuation report, prepared by Mestre Greve Associates dated March 22, 2007 is included with submittal of this application. • - • '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: The Tree Survey and Arborist Report completed for the project by MBA(included with this submittal) found that of the 292 trees currently onsite, only 59 appear to be salvageable by pruning or regular maintenance. An additional 60 trees are in marginal condition and could possibly be saved with maintenance. The remaining 130 trees are in poor health due to damage by fire, age, or neglect, and should be removed since they are potentially hazardous. Two of the existing windrows could possibly remain in place with the proposed development, and the single valley oak could also be preserved. The remaining trees would require removal as part of the project's development. The arborist recommended that, as per City and State regulations, all removed Heritage Trees be replaced at a 1:1 ratio with minimum-sized 15-gallon trees. Specifically, the report recommended that the northernmost windrow be extended eastwards and that additional trees be planted throughout the development as per the City's direction. 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: The site is located in Area 5 of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy tabled to existing Master Plan System 5 drainage facilities and the Victoria Basin Secondary Facility via offsite drainage • improvements to be constructed from the proposed development to the existing drainage channel on north side of the SR-210 freeway between East Avenue and the new Etiwanda Channel. TTM15122 East Avenue Environmental Info Fonn.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 5 of 12 Created on 3123/2007 11:39:00 AM A,B,&C- 61 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please • contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) 600.00 Peak use(gal/Day) 1,200.00 b. Commercial/lnd. (gal/day/ac) 0.00 Peak use(gal/min/ac) 0.00 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank ® Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591: - - a. Residential(gal/day) 270.00 b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) 0.00 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units:85 Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Minimum lot size is 20,000 sf, maximum lot size is 37,751 sf. Average lot size is 22,891 sf. Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): • • • 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $0.00 Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: Anticipated number of bedrooms is three to five. Architecture has not yet been prepared pending approval of development entitlements. 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: • Anticipated sizing to be 2,500 sf single-story floor plan and two or more story floor plans with sizes up to • 3,500 sf. Precise architecture has not yet been prepared pending approval of development entitlements. TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 6 of 12 Created on 3123!2007 11:39:00 AM A,B,&C- 62 • • . • • TTM1B122 East Avenue Environmental Info Fomi.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 7 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM A,B,&C- 63 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: 33 • b. Junior High: 20 c. Senior High 21 COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 27) Indicate hours of operation: • 28) Number of employees: Total: • • Maximum Shift: • Time of Maximum Shift: • 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): • 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: *31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818) 572-6283): • TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 8 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM A,B,&C- 64 ALL PROJECTS • 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to • provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. • • Water: Cucamonga Valley Water District Sewer: Cucamonga Valley Water District • Gas: Southern California Gas Company Electric: Southern California Edison Company Telephone: Verizon Communications Each purveyor has indicated by verbal confirmations that they can provide service. We are currently • in communication with each purveyor to obtain written confimation. When received, that written response will be provided to the City. 33) In the known history of this property, has them been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides;fuels, oils, solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use,if known. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was conducted on the project site by Winzler and Kelly and is included with this submittal. The assessment concluded that the site presents evidence of low environmental risk. The western two-thirds of the site were used historically as an orchard operation. A review of historic aerial photographs indicates that the orchard use was discontinued prior to 1977. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment recommended the following actions: 1) It is recommended that a geophysical survey be conducted to determine where, if any, undocumented/non-permitted UST's, underground pipelines, utilities, or other structures could be buried on the site, and 2)Prior to the • commencement of development on the site,the first six to 12 inches of top soil should be tested and analyzed for commonly used pesticides and herbicides to determine if any further actions are necessary. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials,including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No. Storage or use of hazardous and/or toxic materials are those limited to normal use within the home after this project is completed. • • I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts, statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an •dequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 9 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM A,B,&C- 65 Date: ' 0 •07 Signature: � / /G Title: Ppc. • • • TTM 18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 10 of 12 - ' Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM A,B,&C- 66 ATTACHMENT A Water Usage • Average use per day Residential Single Family 600 gal/day Apt/Condo 400 gal/day Commercial/Industrial General and Regional Commercial 3,000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1,500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 2,500 gal/day/ac Industrial Park 3,000 gal/day/ac Peak Usage- -- For all uses Average use x 2.0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family 270 gal/day Apt/Condos 200 gal/day Commercial/Industrial • • General Commercial 2,000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1,000 gal/day/ac General Industrial 1,500 gal/day/ac Heavy Industrial 3,000 gal/day/ac Source: Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 6/00 • 77M18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 11 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM A,B,&C- 67 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: • Elementary School.Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda • 5959 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga,.CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School • 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 • • • TTM16122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 12 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM A,B,&C- 68 Eq \ctist-7 •)wri.f.,,,,,,,,,\ y.)\%-..- ,,, 1 –) ‘h,Q,.-Nctil ------f '3..1.141„,(./2/4,/141.5 \%_Hipt15 .`,,F..- -frc....%%1 7_,„:„",,,,,,, , , ,, ) ■ A ,. 1`. heo cis ill-• . \Iv' ---I - //11 ' 1.tr-R.10 0 . A 1—z-----> r\ 'Sdkat6"--^ v,-----" h• , A.„,t'iL ::,:i 1 lia4.,;,,r cr,rcirt 21,;:fdiraar41.44 te4:9;“;,:r.;,,,,I;',:„, ,.,,si ".•=':' „ ' -. • '431k '''' .:-., n A c)3 ‘\\ ,-2)....7 '"*.t:g4h477', 1_,.1 .{\ ' - ' II' .:"..1.('=")) i(N, 0 rd.///of c. .2 •,,-";`,-, )/ii \°- ,i, /TIP, 1- /,3 ., . I !st, 1 . '".{-, /t&3;X-1/(kral/ _, c -- _' 1- ' ;.;,ti--',(),„/. , v•r, ,,,,E1,411fr-,,.. ....-\.,_-- --s „:„, Lfri4 1.,,,,,.,_,,jA,-- — ) ,,, f .\\,,,,,,-,,,ii\\,.„2.\., ,,-,;;;;., , ,-, _ ‘,.,,---.., _ _, _.„ . ,) ,,,, ,;.,...3 N k(N" 1[ ' •-■\-\C p-- .c.i_1.3.. ‘`,,,,,,,,fct p .H4/01'0 L-1 /-1,,..,411? --P- / 11/ -< it'-'-' 0 -• Da c„ on_ " ...SPIIICC;4-- y 3 i '• _ • - =. ,,) i , I, -''''. .._!] .-` ' tik\o[iii■;)3, ' .1/)/ii/,'i'l 4/(1 ' ' ii ir , j77- - - 4‘,, I ..- , . , ",., ' ''',..■,A\i '. .//: II,1 ;,r(I .idi . - ',, I – . , f it ---C' •-• ----. ''IL - ' , ' 1 '- 4 '''• " 1 ‘‘ 1 ._ • , , , _ tat: _ ,...-.. . ' . t 2 „ ant 2t2r . .. , • - ` e , __ , , . , _ . _ , . , .... . , . . 11 - , , 1 . _— . . ' : -------- —T--- – - / -- , _r --11352 r--- " , - .... _.- -' „„,.- 21 , _. , . . . , , - -- , . — ' 11 .--- ,-- LI, _ - / PROJECT SITE , –_ - .,, I --- I ,, - , - 1 1 '-/7.7-7-1 - - - - ----------------- '''' ..." \ )(- / • ....-.' • . a „- ,--- ,..— .,... ,..,. I 75 -- II 1.. ..,..- ,‘MIMIt Avenue II.-1---- Ca- . -- --- • • School 1 `,... .. , -- I- --, . " - ■ . 1 , 2; --- 1i _,, ___..__ 29 1; ' I -- f4,,. 28 7505 ,----- 30 r I _•-•:-__,-_-—.-- • .., - II •••• • ..% \.•\ _ • , • _ _ „..„ . , . .•• 1- . . . ._ _, , ., 1 .• _ __ • , _ • - ---rr- , I, Tit — , 1 i 00 . -- / • i ' 03 II :._ , , 1498 10 - 21;;NUE IIIMMEMEMIIIIMMI — — — — — — . -.... •• _ C • ----Th, I I I i station 1 • , • (-) i • - i •• ci6 , qh• .. N, , ' –1..ocr, „ • --. 1 I ....— /– ----1 , 1 t--,^ ----- -------------- – '---- , ---I, ti.;,, . . i,____I , ; Evvanda .......ir V k Fire.. • $13_i 0 C „ w i Station i n7..1 I i 31 J___,..4 , • 33 _// 34 1 . II I C2it I 1359 E.7 r : • I izi ' • ' :: , ; /-'---/ . A • • ' or' 1 ■ "--... I, • Etiwanda • ===:. . h ...,,.. 1 W ' 449 32'30' 1 1 451 ' 452000m E INTERIOR-GEOLOGICAL SURVEY.RESTON\IIRGINIA 1999 1 ) I A,B,&C- 69 HIGHWAYS AND ROADS Appte:YON ' � ii t' 1 "x e r v r ,-t illi CT 1111 ta I. ti F t /r ---kim ,leapena ril ���� s :�� jkj as:J,,Yr�'r" is.'�F}+tcF+ ;rores�'.r'l r• V��� 9/ ,,L y 7� 4 Y/J /rRCr ' s}tr'£`�2z'".Ye ^`' r PrOJBCt Site ! !, 1 �/� J //// j y t:r !b ks5 {rod µ i"''' f )I 1:, � ..b,� lfl I, 1 �Y > a �Pub r �� jy rr r!x j ei =p NOT TO SCALE I' J�"77 y�"r��� r ,F ,.• ' fir K✓ t l' < c G �'r �. - r: `` Project Stte , Y � "� ,`� ,y '••`�irn p F .,r , ,F' r a`?'4 r+x" V :4 yr , ,f> ! f ,L,,, ";.F r r l/ !1 Bf' �r n a s)r V t Yt /rrfifr"7Sa1� x. F '� .L!r }i� ,A,'L a i4 it M _4� aF I!� Sik'r'r- ,�s Y�'�� 'e �.�' Y s yiG✓ w J Vie• t i xk^'rNWrti f.t W �.. �+' v &` �p>w � c 7 a° e d.t { w M iu w tlq a:He .. a° k b ,in h `ran caSthi a#Y 15 ?4 i b lj ' x,.8n Bm87dInQ -- ". �e 4�'S^ri+ ca N�iw d� xp �'ISii-^cx,:,,,ay`ym'7,'1';18t)44 ," °s"� 'M n ..An`taha'� r .r '.� mT' *m'"^�.� ll. !t Fi.t+ L qk .a p S e ,.-,. 5 v� ' y� �m,�fav ..v. " JV '�� 'Y -��'�s° waz a .,n�f•^1�flt8 �r_�r��ti"`�+s I�'rvl �� m'3�J�.�uY'� n tryrbL'Ph'� '� 1 hx' M me * f�- y r`*t r `tr nS ra.:�� S whi .r a W"MR '+ ' .Rx' i `tr r�i m ,P +'.c*Af �ic. at" y Y a'iar *age:� x'• i2' t ;:' . ! J ='': 3 ,*'fix � aai�'si �'n"x� q � .r` v'" i / v .,a:t5 p.A� zl�$a xC fT,t t;`dl rgts� er K *t r �.y " •7j1 ' ":-, a{ - • Fv`'t9 fn „tr,&lChmca A.y.j P"' tz':.1---r ' !f.%it,`" ^- ' ''` ., .J' ur Ne #Yv-+!*�a ,aq.`+y _ yv. i �..f s a i14 � a .f r / 7.--:. � i., l�� Gi' 4i f.(f4' r. 1 n ` xr '#s Jx r 6J sx il�i tt N ,l '� r/W. P _.�[f,� , ;`: ' . t ✓C ! . Iko:if 7` ax X"z ! �. ' ATM , �' \ '/.4' i �! 3 },{�'1 ,�,) �-• `� r3?;� ,I! y '!, Y .i -.4:. y. •.�"� r I.yr �� ' Moreno i�al ey •_ 1 r r J) Y s ! 1 'YM .4-,-,,,i K t r ,I51yf ,N..! " ..ter' ,61-.:14 t l l:' Mathews „f:,.- .. ® c f r� fT Y iv it-..1"' ! r ` r ! 1 9r --•'', x% Y fI�' '"'1" . ��pLS �y' ,�t r r ''1 `t� m J. y d E k ! ,Y , � rFilr� i JJ�' Tustin .� ,:s v ;k /4 J� fir"' G� �it 3��a „� I se,ly p trm �.mr y� Source:NAIP and San Bernardino County 2006 ���� � l 5 2.5 0 5 Exhibit 1 • III Z � Miles Regional Location Map Michael Bruxdman Assoaates 23060012•02/2007 1-RegMap.mxd INITIAL STUDY,EAST AVENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA A,B,&C- 70 11-- . - --' ' I j- j F , ..,_ ,...- 1 ' / „-- 7- . - ; „-- ---- ) ' _ - _4 2._ ' -- i El P.2 __>'• Eil --•'-'- ,-.E , 1 I . 0 ' .--'" E. I — - . -,,, ), - o. , _ „ir., / j . ' rI'll- '=:-,, --- l'--N 'S I - 11 I . ,...,...v.::--.:.- ,ipt,6,70' 1 , . - 1 - ..” --:'. I -] ..,T; c-_,<'''' :71"--_ ------- - L.,p.----- -- - , 1 e" Tank • '7° - - -- _• ,,,i), ,z -- i' :•;; ... ' -- _, I „ _ „;„_Jr: , __ _ d.412411"2'..- "1----<< 1=1.' - 1--- - .,-" ,fiV I•tXt 7- „, - ------- 7-,1; 1 a \ 1 -- ,."7/ 1 1: i 1 E• - --- ,-Summit Ave X :11 11 Ea F . - : - Seb V 1■51.--c---- -k,,-. — - ;r e as pi, ____- -1:%,„,.. \ c:t..,.. -t;L'it-i--•.4 "..."LL _ -- ,,,--• " ''.-"1‘) !2 7 _3 ., i, 5 --- 7: Gat it i)1 _ __ -1- 4-;=;-:":-f-t Project Boundary o_ -r I pi . II _-- ' III ¢1 • -'. a ' ,,,,-_ ‘._,,,t7,-_,,,c,„_Sig S I I ; • . • 2 ir-1 ---:7''''''r „-- I l' • I /4 +... ti• n ■""-, 1• 1 "t ; ..... — --.-- I! I: ' 11 II ,ntrói SI . .i! L•Tr.=MI: 1 W I i - -__)1 ,7:MM ,' i V,:::..,,ii.::1"-h.fE: H , f 1 h r f( • • ::-..-::'.:',1,,i ---- -1- --- [rt.- ::,:?-t? ,-,.::..::;...:1, ..- - pc '---•- ' - -. 13•.::3. }"..,,.... /359 E .• -87;-—• - - - 11 •• s, 1-• I `1• '/ ,..1:- 7"■":,-,'• ••i •• 1 fi I A: I itt: -, . p II__,_ - / I' Etivvanda ---------a-- -c :_- - -1 ,•,. it../rHERN • _ _ II PACIFICZA: ,- --- - 11:=7r----. l' -4 -',:- : • i I .... I } ; - , 4i.. it ,- _ --,2-'2-<,;, • , II _EASE 14-.1.--': .11 , ,- --- • Br/ 1 . P•7 Etiwanda ) . ,7" <,,,''''. •'*' il : r in .• ,/, - .(. ? : / - / 7 7- :p. //e/ p / r\,i _ ■ - --- Source:USGS 2006 e INVIi!!E ilr 1 1,500 750 0. 1,500 Exhibit 2 LIIIINEI 111. 101111111"" Feet Michael Steadman Assoclates Local Vicinity USGS Map 23060012•02/2007 I 2-USGS.mxd INITIAL STUDY,EAST AVENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA A,B,&C- 71 1 °4kb M H m a L k 2 S atvC: -� _.v°b a trras' i 4-z:42, f 's.. �'11.-.�. °" r A' r 9f.,r I� �.' � .. I ,� I f{It�{r( x-'74. * •+l>= I a I 4 1 f �5 � w. ] ' -,/' � 1 t 'h{ rte 1 : i,f fd �'�. `•.6 I f�i 4 �\ ;.A n ! c fi VT T .. I j _ p g�: �., �!k�.rr� +R�h}J t � ".- 1. , lZ ' �' .7 iJ^P3'YYYt".S$11:4 t P r"ir a. l+"�r''r� f f„ s 4", C t , • :r�.ir ri x I }I 'k 4/-2--.:2•.;:-.& ern-.^ 'f 4 1j :' ry p i s. .fi Naha,!" : .r< d } :-. t t fJ <a'r7 .L,.� rC \ ~ i \ -j� 4 Y , - S �' ,'j ad Iii Ei W ,+� I - it _ Ir.', r , 4 fJ.� ? l ' —.: 1.4 � . - -,�", f 11 6lMMrr :',. - " TF A( 1 7Q - 1 " -,74";-;:,� a y •,y :42)_. i. Y i',..%; �'�>� `+. R r..■ '1� y _ e r ti ; �i ila '�� 1 }, ��. tAdr— �,� :T'. y, Cq a 2.�i i3�s�° T ; �r .:a.-,; '� - ( 1�„�, S,',J I ` -"�. , ' „'T a ,, ''�', i is a ." - t • x1r m � ,: + ` ro��� T -I 11(L„ M1 i` r w . .1?-7:•, ,'� h vi f _ l �{#It L�(,n�GILI N 4.Fat a I a>vC'^l.-«-. Project Boundary - �^'� u::4::,.;,.,:4:)n ( :-.115.-'7 ,0;,-,-..• 21-z--;i7:3 :� `, . J I.,,J { •• n - .rttN g+ of a ._ ':�.d` .. .d.. .r � �' Y li zyn. �•_` j; ���d,'/ .s..=-� �s�`� �erJ,;s_____., n *..r. ;.: il1Y Jiyhp+ ITC II 3 'fva �'�aA s �„w4 • �.'-'3CCT��Y ''��^MIS'nJYI La I � - � 1 I �'-a'� �ro �r \ ! I a i^L«'-o- .",� _ 114 i" :.,-.l . '1/2,‘,,,-.,c "'.'�",,,:..,15..„ , y ,1 �f- F st' Kui 1.-f--t'ar I r•tlr �- 14 ',�. I � % c'it a Tr no .y•4.!",..4,:-.,„. t, : t 4 ® i, I y A >`+.I t .S „t4,--) C _.V' I � ? T rt � ?.L't cain.a� .d bn-- l., �'” ayy,m -` -I ..,„”,. r r,'?` J,.,s.� 0,, _,,6 y t..:.,f. j 3r y t "w I. ,4 r �a i'*{4 � *' � 5i I„t .x'�,'Ja t•a.�+�it?_,:--,,,, ,-`°+er^..:r mss �I ' rx° , , 1 " f f�r�.• tr< imalk - :' FT s�' Et r k, xy. :i• tz t J r . 1 'f�, ,� e_ y < L_ � �'Y ,5 xGl {:f''''1 aia a 4 _y g� I ¢"� ^• ,H 74 FI , 1 G 'y4•I �a� ��t�a 1 . ul "'_'2A 9wa1. .1-4r r^ I + .Mt.yam.. +�a„ 2h rt . ' ' .4 TIT r ,j :t, -.m t a 1J •4 ,i 1 C'R✓ � -1-Y ;r1;--_-_.$T 4' I;, fYYI. kttllie I aY ,k. , f jif`l �+uv Is v i i`l'''1/44,: 3 ,,,ri w ,- k 1f(`'.▪ IN��yy��et..t G�_ , -_- s a I Lila s It I �!ay} ai" i to I S �` ' �. 1 rum:knJN RtH� ill I:h 7_ '. x �� x` � I 4 _ ..�xx,,� etlr �t,2rtgleT.41-tp7n Ye +,i .y, M i £=' kr 1 Cf"7 � r?Sfr � ---is,... " 1" `t° i. :rmu . 5 �f i,,f.-- 'jam tl , _ - : • � +3„e�`�3' r.. rf:;3 c lai T '77.17:r'" a r 72-'44'if H/ '� `! �,4 "r rr , • • ''''l' f t", n +.^ r. _ JS,,,I... :C k"' ry. 4... tom_ (. y > `a L's7+l ry n J tx ppC 9ASE LIIJE NVEr• his n > Lt��' 'I, ✓ . '??i) -Nair s .. •„�.% 1�� t,.i z•c„.:T. r) .1,„,k SCI F 41 Fr ) Fi � l Y d R ., .....„:„.-y,may f ,i ��• 8 ;1_,..-- ra r * J'�i . ' a r -46•.. C I ( z s Y� F > 1I at sf r { j(,b:i�' fr sr' £' . .• '.e �.:.,t� .. . .�xo -ct -, . r .`. C ?•I ' '+ d:' NRF S.iit ��I�ryf y., 04-4,4^,t,-...N s�^ ''. n I .r.a' I -a i„T:. 17-7, 11---.A.:i *-, e 3`r� c I��I �T1:li t ry ,��,4-. .-.g.*--h � -"°a L `� � FiF; 1 �,k?.c - ' b.. � � ��` lil �ij�i '4f r f , s T - ). Z U-a7;'.,,':evTi • _ .3 .....'. :`3 ' +I:en ' I>°/ , �4Y!..n. L.Ja.._. s �'J ;4w.m. .fit” . `ae� Source.NAIP and San Bernardino Count 2006 ®®� 1,500 750 0 1,500 Exhibit 3 • �� � °�■ Fey±. Lori /icini � Aerial fan ,vLchael Brnndm:m A.vsoci�tcs 7.30A0012•021200' 3-Aerial.mxd INITIAL STUDY,EAST AVENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT A,B,&C- 72 RP,NC-1 CUCAr 01.13x., - " ..7 17. tl...:f•",..4/41 .-- - ..,,t,Ti ifEi' 1%.• :-:,ir. ._ _ _ ,.. ._,.rttp-.6c .. .., it- - ti.:41t1-t: . ....,_ t E. ”, .1.1=f;tr.:S,.,;'?.:- ?,-.1.'rEttf fr ' ...''.- ',- . _ _ .-. ' it p et; ? ‘1 -,-- r-rt tilrAtt-irtg7,a0r1,01;;Pi'''-'715:447.141',41;4:t?,!.r".11$.1.:kri.-;',E; :l't : Ic7H1' ' r; ° FH4::::.i'.111(4'. ' 1 1 1(;;112;-: ..__. ,4404.241')0:41,;(4;:7'4:1 ta...-4.'9' r.,'""..'•,;il:71DT•r4.T•••:•-•:;.-•••-.•:-....:,:r.:•;•,.. .;T:'E..•i-....„.....<,.: ....'' 'e,...,:.;• ,. 1Q.:t.-.-f.f..r.,"4-p-T,...,,,,•,. .--.--.f 4-7-.71.,....N."..,...1 : %T'.. - 1%.... : . ‘'3? .‘33:.; 3-7 - - f1R1.../.3r:3........,..-... .31..11 --'.;:; '..3;:;rfi r. .' . "' ' .. . . S.r.54;L3C.:1 31.3-'... q''.4 i: _a...1.1:. .- - .. .. . . '` . • ' a $':. t1P33-1r ' .''''i 1.1'1','" - ., •'3';''''''.1.' L' r ' I .r ..r. .-1-/ ft, ..• ':(''if '';': . ::.: - . ''...." :T. ' . 'I 1 >- •: t7i.;.1.1; I:. 1) t: - f; f ,'* . . - , F ,41. , _ •. ,) ..• . A.i: - m.4.:_l-',/ . .. liz - .7- 4 j •h....., • . f. - - • .. tt ,. ,.1 • , .., •. , .„. pl, .---tir . .., . !I.: .-4 .-, • .. .tr.! ....; i:-...::: , , y' ..., , . dT. . ,'4ii: ,-, „. . .- . ..„ 1,„ ,/il, , *:-.rt.. --.--. . • ....J. , . • . i„. 'Is .-- , %. .„. .' . II ' . . r- '' ' . ' P.1!! 1' . . . cl, , . - .g.;: i ,4. hi. 3 3 • .- t 'i r - if G) , I •• /: ... . a f,..4 " ..'" •, ..-. ,.., , la!tty-, t '. (' •...:.'.. - -`.-,-.'":-.;..;'t ,. -'..%,...',-c1.-V-tr^ .7 . "il,r ' ' azt:: - - --'7 27•7 . . . • '; . . , .--.-.,:. 747,. ri.lta'.•'' l't.,:-..-Et'. . : lei-r:7'-',, .5-' " -` * :::::::-. •-::-,--•i,jt•Pi.s..,-...2::f)41 . r a I,,, --- -• . - .1ill :.• . ..,.. : . . ." - i .'-p,..2:...;‘,-----:::tI : -', • tl.,...,i,L,31,:p*: .Lk;...-f- .1 . ..,. f,.._,.v.,,,7.,7! .,..i,. 14‘-;,..14110 ..i,:ft.-737:..7-'ti ',.7.,2;_,;.:1,,..!,-.fik.: ,i,z ''''i ,.•..:'- . , - - - cts....' .4i.;7.1..,. .... ...;.t.,./......- :.;.-t'ey!ript----h,:.,,,rit,itt t : 4;-.. , •..- y.... ..!.. ,.. '....44' .1:1.'eP4's.h. :11,1??,”;;f:‘,:l 4..'ha'trI.,', ,.. ::.■-ee;::'..,kir41/2i.C; w.::' e: ' ?.;..1.if)'-';'• ! i • • ;.:F161:.;:::::../":--".:1.:L:it'413t,:-1-"±):41"..-'77t;:-11:;,:..!"t1.:Acilfriiiir1C?,..:-aitnt;I:MP'..tQAPIlefil;iltieL.*HVIfilttlt_.* C. :.:11 II 'II., ,!I'1#1- 1 ::17.11.:11■11I;b2; tit: ,I.1. ,..s.t4P .Ls,' •itt,40;12.17,2:5.7110105;* ,t:-'-.:,5er#,,pfaik '.../.1.1rtt. ris.1.1 'fr '''' ' '' ',.1- p‘. , ,-;.;, ..--1,/, ..&k..9,,$) .CW 1..•31‘;•3r ,Lt_ lb.4:=TWI,,., 1;44 ti, .trf.II', St. .;NY';14.4-1451-frtg.'1."'C' fte,,..t?",11-,J.114:.;I, ,{['1,2. -1 V -....'S.. P.'S';',72,7A-,47a:V.' „,-,,fif,„.,..i........; „fox.-.,,7..9„4 4:47;;,riggtt„ ,17 :„_,--1(:::..1, -et: 71Q2-,II- i‘'''' VI 4Vin,..±34K5411113,4:';34-1,W3-.'- reCe?173?`1.T/71-1.3:4=1'4 1 : '::. 3 ti" ;3.41:Ill 3:.... . :c_!.:Hirqj4i.;‘2::7;-::;;;Etethliat.tir..41V1.),T1'41215:kt4....ki."441:41-.t*II .;Ytra;;;:-Z22,;;.•3441:7?;C.,.. ..:1.' j , '..r. vaii 1 , E.,, L,e,2., . r. :1 . k.::4.....c.:;;,4--Ari.1.,,a4.2-: ...::.,- ;.:„.171,._-fli,-,k,12 ,.:iff..1.:::„.:24.21.t...2:3f:24:-.•..,.;:„:,,.:2;i74,:a-*:52:?..2 : 2,7... P..=imr:-•is,..„ ..„.--,-.,:fa„q.: I.L.-i.,:kitt..-e.„•:•:;,--*:,-.11;%,*=2,:::,..,•••.,---, ',,,...,.,t).,,,,:„..::.,...„., , : "1,- .- •1.444t- °: . 1-1°';°;:cf:-IF.•'-'''-..: II...er.,•..ira''.".'=',1.°%,: .,' , r :.'-' . 1,,IP'railett-it,•-.t. i ;■',1•1;.':',,..'"'-:.''-•--,-,r.yi..:j."--.,` ._.•.13--':- ?T,';' ‘. .-7,e;' *1:-%',.t1'-'ili: '‘'` .:.t':H. ..' ,,.",`. .g:t.17t:'• :..". V1:40, 4.11 -'4.4-;?fit-. ;-, ,:fti:i .:•. .. -,:-..,,,- .ti.:7fr,&I''f-!=-? .' - `-s ... ', . , il• .: ; Et:i . . ,. Itr„.yr41;114.cra„,...;;,-::,, i, .,7 : ,.. .,,,. .-..., .,..- -...; „...,.....:.... ,,, , :,..,. ..%: •,...... i. ., 1 .- -..7...; 42.e.t....t1,- . 1,,,,if-3:':.1- t . . , ,:'',I.4.-"!,,,<- Id.0,:.•-. . ‘..„:.. i, °, I .- ;,,..:4.-°°,.s'..jI,,i',''.;,''A,,,•i•;,lj.--, ,,.:,1-2-) -7: • . 7'.',,, ;: ,,(' • '.... „,-,--.' ,] .1,72.•.,1-:. s . • 1.;.1/4,-.;;'•';1!/,i,vic.' 1,P,'!•:,r"; ' i• . ,L,,•C.•.:v l''4- -•. , r 1.•..;.7-A: : ..- -7 •.:-1/4- •” 1 - .!,',..-••••:;!`::::.; , ri•----.- 1' ■ ' .,. - ! 114''-:.•;2-t.'-;%';--,.-• ),',-i- '' ;.....--.,--:-' :. • '-'= .. :I ; 7. :.1'-.•_.--' ; i ; ‘•.;'c'•:---1fritr:•;' •` •.,'-' •-r-Thr •••• - : ' •- ' 1.7•. • - ,• ''i.'••• .. .. • ‘: '1 -.. • • 1,t...-,1-4•Wi•••,•••_.. ■ti,--4;.1-V;2`1, 1;1 ., - : .i. •;„ ):-..-.. . - , . k,..-. .- .. . ..- .(4..: .-..,, ...- I"*e;r4rigrite/:: , r I, : 1,41.(^ YI-L-,„ ; '::'. ''. !, ':j-:,... -:,‘I' `-■• ;;.,- , ,;. -',.t.:,y,.i.. ,'-; '''.' 1::s.,.4atime-- , t.,...s,...i3:14-stii• tii.-zii - -_-. ,3:„:::i:::44-_,-;-1-,54•-•:.:,..2-:!ii:::,...t....,?;,.. ..:',.4,:-.•:;,_ i -iiii .; ,, gt. w , _ v,•.-,.., r„, t :2,t..., I',...,,i.f...:7-4t-1,,,;:.:_,..V1-;1174,-...-.7-.';:i.:--‘?-41:--:%iiirt-t4i."-:.S. ...,t ttt!..;.• : :Jai: _ ,A51, rar- 23:.:7 W.:-:-.; r.,74., :,,,,,,:r4.4....„.iv,10::.,;,..4„,c2itny:2,,,, i vii.: :,, ,f..6.„ effokfelk., _ ,...,...6 4:t.;ici: 1 ...r4t.,...ifez.f.43,4L-:_ ,:tc...vi,..;....,.,;..y„, . it,.., r...,40..., : tpt-ltt' t'''' "--%.-, ■.-. -- , t4.,"{-."jr-titbi'fr",t.t .rt-YeA's-tit ....1 r±,1".-T• .4.„..,,,. . .,„ ..zr t- 2?„,,s, 2,717;,sirke .p.-4,=4,7,-to-,t'1. 0 o....im riv-I t:•d.'-.: '.. . tv-',.t1uftut.c.,.`,,:- w.”0'• .7 E7'. -3:14 .r,'••4$fc'-,A'ke-t.,-.1 ''''•:7 ;i•:e,- °..c4,',.,I;;;1• tif ,•r.-.s,,-„„ .' 'i litsi„.ve , °‘,14-• ' .•.;t‘ I ,•t70;.....:41:?,;': I...t ji;iffialii.; --i:2,.•' °°,• '1'.1.11t.):°1 1 S',.,'I,.,,. erit°;°1',.•*14.44°' r: '#'-w11-30,••• !-If ••.' ''''''''',: . '' " i :'''.,./.', l'i4:4,L. '...,m,r..,,In .• ‘..W.. . ..,.'_t;i 4, "'t.'•'--•:-L - a' ay, .? • •!■'„..i.Lt•. r.k..” oT,;„^••,.:4 11 !,4f.i.•%lit ,, .14.-Luatcry t.. ------ ,.,.. . t.l.. , I;-,-;.:•'2.;:c.l.' in'Aia..1; e,"tri...'a,i,5i''‘wia n-, 7, .7..r• . . _ r• r- ' ID i : (1', i r.,C...-Ar.... •••irt.i..:7-°.' '.°‘.•.. ' ' ;4.1.'°‘..;':,Atir., It° --. -",, 2' Itt, (t } r',.,.•:.,::CI,..1.,... .,---7-r-C., -.-.7r :t....11T,7-, .g;..,-;:v4i-_ i 't o I - . A B &C- 73 • { m u ' si'd 4. * -i r 1 ..e. ..� w.'-:^�y� 414 rd „�".u.i t - '� , L-+e w,..�.x Y c ...-..',:.•f;. C'^Y a xx I 1 �.ur,^- i,.r. _e s zi-F t•- _ •'�'. s , .^-iii" .: d 4rY •stixt`-_r ' i� ;.-&4.4q.;:" `r„y t, n•:if d'i 9J i+7 '" tC-"r72iF }t �y +a' .. ni--40 .'4c"`•.+. t +` 1,� t .':4 • - ` ', .'� t.'+""y-^' rga����� iy X 'Y t"u`w�3` y�@a,'d s ^. t� ' _ °`ry '� `;e.' -- it ye 'jrt 4, i?4 "'-�_ :7 r ,ar"�� �, .,11: '' p ,itt, y$tjl•+ r.,I •° '._.e`""_ q�r," 'k.� e<> '" "„4T rf'f z,, v-,ss�J. ,;r!f:._a� 4 it—:-.. •etr ` 1 w 'i� P?,sl,'+i .i.5.4::.„;anx, at t o ([[��{{�,��,+}'`a 44z., 71 S �i A{ 'I .S t*. `J 3a� �t'�a9"" cr "' wFr ,h' ' i° -t-.: " �`_1 L �,.' t "r !. ftt�o f x d} riF'Y 3 • } i�cr,. , t`t ,i Ge'Yr $il -a y..r.,, '. �' a n 1f '�J ! 1 � ''�.•?*4n'.F- 5 i?�. irk- w�..r Y ^>x . ' iN 9 f'K" 2.-" -4g07a I T;' ' ,.,r ,. 3fy �'.1htry ti"'s ?" Y a"�°. n t7u+ i��,� r + j4€7� x 7 n. _ r+ 4"~,�5� +"L.>: a3 t• w.".e,..... .+q+*. .+ . S2 "i,. -kr ,ia I![ hqd „� "' Y4A;c:" "�+r .S>.°S.S°ie'�+r,.-2' 2 ri. Db-- rrB.r) ,y ,"tart rl, f, +�Ih Ut ,..r1=�,wc-.is'-L,,, -�c � n.7.4..�=.-'1."'... .47494,-.1—.µ AlttS.h.+ Stis.. �v(d-Y1 x� wr.r •✓• Photograph 5a: View northeast into project area from southwest corner of property. •,' :tit..,,V ii- SK ,.' 4, is t-tj - - 'F� -•+ ,! t' SY`6°Y �Yh��yy ,�H�a,a,n. n, r:1 7'r -A sad�'. sre�y�. ''�' x t r. ?At., ,•• __..F — ._.+ II a$ -e -ar. I jk`ir pgRi�i 't y,, {t ' T - � of 9.,'xi - rr a, P3° + , 4'-at iy r t. Ems. .q t m .{, i f 'r J " +fit.'_' t y `'`w'+a 4 'A''. ..+.v+ jidci?t 1 ! 4�. tr i+ r' X`''r"" #�y..wv `7T'L. . ` 4i u - n . p ,,'„c 41:Ft C_q i^ r y-C ris e-'af` t_ .'yx, �f✓ r?' ,..,4-`. ;,t i .`wt�i S '"SY4- �7 - .'�'w 'tae ',.+'Z •s_ 1.{"?'., a F 4 ,4,r- ..7f„3,,}'C..'C.S.,fs t:si r`a"Y` ,' } • S' :. ' e:�fi r.' ,it's�t#' ZetC” mob.i� us.+�yY '-'"a- s--Z,.4 I r '` • `'m}c 4 tti,„:a.. rc tcw t< n 9��.,/ u a-- ,q!'e. c-'* tint ✓w 4 °t v t ns 47u ' r-4 :4,,x.,; r °- y :.a .rktn. ... ........ ° -.'iatitj.-4, iv. �c 4&v ,ri• �` 4t . ' ^C' r i-t'y`t c:; Photograph Sb: View to north alone East Avenue from southwest corner of project site. Source: Michael Brandman Associates,2007. NINNN Exhibit 5e ❑�`�� Site Photographs 5a and 5b Michael Brandman Associates 23060012•02/2007 5_site_photos_(5a)and(5b).cdr INITIAL STUDY, EAST AVENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT A,B &C- 74 RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA 5r P r .. _.. 3 4 4 �� 4 w 4 r 1 1 v ' il '4 y4y 1 fA - - t'Aa•s"ir...x.�r 1 .cC ab..mr^:r..isrg 4 5 u-`14�n'y.ds ak t: :P ,rya ;,- r z ,I„ j 5`s ° r�E0 ;e r Vi+ 4 4C? 00.:,.. .--- y° ik h Fr r s'kfi . ell' f y s , t,V.. n e � x- ` ' y. , i{ -ri } :.. ' • _ i y Yw ' I a,,.. - a' 3 :e -+; x a �+-M. �w-,— kr "xs x,9 ` ., ' , • • k r :wu u- '. t u `T • � >. "S` h Fa m s. .L x e- .0 yss.�e. � � W W e2r,4 " r s.aE.{ 4 � ' w: , ° Mn as d K ;r' 'e s�- ar - 'YCf sue_.x" ^t s' k a a yy as , C" 6 -� -s ry �*,.4- ,1 ., �+ � ;4s- wK Z, v .w t 3J1 „• 't rr �1< n A -a l f r r i' , "443:4",H '4 ;r. a ie . "A r t c4 K . f b a . �N a V,'; . .ar.x.,yy� / S w .. — site.�__,.- weaern bomway along iew f Phtgaph Se: Vsite to east from • * N aU , mot''''' „r - i to 1 `T3"a �..a� 1 Ya+r: ••-� .s' .4. t- R, :Tµi rohti•'t' '_+r?r+•.-•,',:,, �" ,' . ~. `� �` en".... to/ free ,„1: s,, .'n'..,xc-y T e r ,F "i v. .n. is�...R"!f'r"4 v c- Ny ��v� a x ' H aV. 1 -- ^KY•t w•'n 'I ..r a. a i a sau "�'i"""' "n.x? FK4.tirX:Izt 1 'Y^. inF t .v tot. lv tvdcr `� p .: 1 AG�� ` .-imp*-5—+�.�ns �'p ����tJ°r Yi � li.� v�Zmrl ^s. � v?�'� t� ��1 gW'.• at�.'I U�, `�r ',=7,4"z F r z%.a:.' .vr�t--ems' `a ,:.-4 0s,:t ifei +'"r'4{, mow- ; "re .,✓"?-..ct i•-"`�" eyes LYws �lafi I sl`^.f""'�.caL 'lz "ei,''' tr�-'H'µ-R+....""".`.!"+ -. x-7 >•ti, .+,T} '}1 y P t,ry riti�,�ykS.s.; Nwt3'r .,.y' itts�'.En 7 , 1c.,�p '� y+ +"�1 -'" :4,4-ti + S Fv?-4r A '" 6' w✓ '-S �.d,�•�JY�ysq,. t'K f yl xn�'S3 "`&J ry Y 4 � ➢1.2 4£-s n-,.: ,>' r' FS.as ti '.c""r'a'r , 'R•3 145- , "" { .* i 9f'..3,, b M<'•Z••Mi, A'rr, a.O' 'i..4,,.. .cam- .,,,. , '-N-,, .w '�"— ";,, `rr x •n •-7, .,rG><r -.�"" oar y .-.,.-. d..+. v' }y"�: ar,'�, ti 1_ ri �' +4',Th a,•y-4 s rNr _ ...irl.filr� J?'r-y2!". m ,r+-a 'i r" ju•,IL'R *> .•':.' `- 4 "' {'`. J^ -i.Gf"T`irr,T.,raJ '� 4“!^:" rm.4:°- '� "i gy.,t nr F + r x f M 'ts eg4, 1�j" r`' :t; 8t�3'u t `� , �.�� •c * +^c'y'4' u' ,I r s f, �, ^y ,�"R,+tA '7- w.4,€r, 1. r'e ,,-I "` 7, +x�'' 9 z. p,z '-^' 3 na,, r 4ifdrja/weC�y ! 5 -. fGC�1f" 'LJm- f y al ,Sa-eirN'.e'y�.¢y 'c�. t A JI ?;7;11;: 'X^ 7 y31'.'' .44111.-47- Y ,v✓-.fay.. .Jif' I' z n: 1,�+r h � by .-•r ! +,.e_ n.mm:a'•1".-1 4,- n•:"9,..4.,,Ft. +s• - 'ce .::Fle. - t-1 "nr-"`r3' a"ku�'`v't;�/�s ..~4'i Photograph 5d: view of site to southeast from midway alon_=.western proles; boundary. Source'Iviichae!Brandman Associates.2(107. • Exhibit 5 q,l Sits Phofiograpl�s Sc and 5d Michael 1irmdman,Asvoriates 23060012• 02/2007 ! r. siI photos 15ck nd(5di.cdr INITIAL STUO1', EAST VENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT _ _ RANCHO CU.C.AMONG&.CA. A,B,&C— 75 , - .-�1 ].y'�J,Y 1,4v eiF-f, ^11, FLT▪ ]' �,.[( .i aril r it t J r t Y t � S `, '°'} r_ [ 'R f R.ky .�C Y.0• 1 .7 r " Vit.". 3 S t 3'+v�3,„ ��1�r �4iF `i-y°aa#o,, 9TH", r� Rt rt"1 -'44'.- n f r ,'1^t 7;t-,,..-- l.,'"' y ' f "t .. ' (LZ ..../.A,,,'%:‘,4•..,...•k.,T a a. li,11`a „�. t, � . . �.� ' '» _+I s• /Yte+T� .ty VUt i'1' : 4 '� f ' lI +J ... l f c t l m•ro 2 )'� t l 1 { C f I FS 3- i C u rr,-{t,rY t Y T^C 1,k -xr 1� + r ,Anpi F.., ,. is t ' p'�-av ;s ' F _"'"' + ' nt d( 5 F,,- 1o.P. y 'n r%d A( rs .., 4..'a `,. YAt A N w l , gym`"` aa"m*t ^�t ,3,1•N•7, +,,.�It`4� ,e� .�t,J xMix e*r „ 44-'' �° ",,A F'�>'e ..,w .�F r -Waf rx �,•A q:'�` .lw Jx�y��,.�� yy � 3 ^<1w* a.xr r'" lt°,i 7 , �� y "'`,-S+r ?x4 Sitt r ...-A.£ji3a i igleti. �, Y-r.;i ?r,^., rc' . ,.��� ^+e "- c'. " Tit dt✓r+t*r u f., /F r tt .,,.f 4..-'A • ,s�F�'°�5��' 'w��f�f� XY 4�� �r��7." 1�:��r t� �I:4.1-4,,,,:i � 4 :• ,?x.� ?r Photograph 5e:View to northeast from center of project.site. • 4 { 1,rf .� to y' $„r yy fix..{ � wq ' ,t i i .14:1-'''.E-1"-1:4`.:".E5 v t V" +�f r t_ r t Y , S 2 rIC ieuv.- 1, 1 sem'a r• • `jaj 71iyr —l. ay. tL -ire ..L.._ (S � i°1°1`+�?S �` 'aais r --j.,.5. �.w*4 ;"3-:.: C"1'it ti F:4";�' �' V• ia*`--. lp F. " �^'.l4 ay'i a ,."" S, y, •Y:.'? —.1:4- r. `t " .. .c. ' 'r+ 3' .F •.-- .��'�? -.�Wt>>�`f"T-Vi "'yavY�'V`r*f '1a'.,f i T .Y.,-'' .t 3 '-i k",a 3*��'.�..a'. ,�7! �r? '^�Yay�{r Fr 'l �Z .�^ -',V iw ,Yt Fr ._.. � ''"n+ viKr.J.R,u� n F* ari'4K•'s K .1�'.�.,. 4sJ x+.. assc. •'" °-�-wA +S t- r a'r 't a'Sr �c r-..i -„ ," '„a, '"7v ,r 104 -t• ,e0arp a t r f. %wy "Vx r� '.»..5,�y 7:.7- ^,..-y.. �.,.'' - "�"' `1y . ,44 ___ vE r ..s 4 aT r -.,> „ ^, Est+.-' ' L`l.-itllr(r--, -� "?L i Y Elt�" $ .f4a. N1 YF f f' Y= 1 L `" .',FY ^, hi�.'T h 4 r3 Y. f 4 ( t/'i - «t ^K 4E 4 LL r�.rk '-P r.�Vtj ,r, > _ tt -y r'- ",, -' ..t;}31▪l• -' .▪ ya▪ F▪ .+ 1 `4 %"iJ t 1.YV a v sir wr ?�i'' ��r 7 m▪ a yr▪, • .t i. Ct I fib . , a%1' r r r".fyl t -f'1 CN .t vtth ,J -r Cate • A• .,...-''.'- z "tP�� -1- ZI Pi M�-r-7%1't4• s- i. t y i r?r'<i_.r �'7- " I + 3 _ar f Fe •rti ,A4 ,.t-f, a:k ! ..2v. t• a .:.:-'4le v 1; ,e.Lfrt. -• ..�w'.F t�F":ef ' 4s _-z. 'sa. ^ _ ., a ... ... "1�.� . ?..•v:?� .....e'4`.: Ri .T...:�. /- x_ .1r ems Photograph Sf: View to west from center of project site. Source: Michael Brandman Associates,2007. N�,'S® Exhibit 5S ®� Site Photographs 5e and 5f Michael Brandman Associates 23060012•0212007 5_site_photos_(5eland(51i.cdr INITIAL STUDY,EAST AVENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT A,B,&C 76 RANCHO CUCAMOfa• A,^f. e . T Thnm) " " x i�ii.,,. 'r Z� 1'l l a' � ri7 3 mac, /" f i l '1 �f1 uf1 17~`�. r l t 1 .+-a. °E 1l> r � a 1 I i Y 'I11 tij4n, .. 111 .�y' i ^�... Y n D NS✓ryft.t 'i } n --ttV- Wk'114ro,- a�y� ,, I aidv„` 'd e -: uu{` °fi rQtvofiF .r?f, �',2-�sF`" _'Mi, �l• �',7b,i^ � t.r..IiL� pec: .g.iiN x'71 .5"."'Ni t� `5 Epe ^ s) ir Y a a y} ia ii s 7.ZI l s t Y n . r * s Y,. ' fir rn x . c a v, 3 " t.; 7eart Photograph 5g: View to east along southern boundary of site. 1 ''["•�y. fiY V11 ._ .:rat*t e.• h-se L . M1'd'yr1 ,r4 1 aE U F :Y4 ! —•i y _ k J . . �::t-i to Photograph 5h: View to east from across East Avenue towards location of proposed project entrance. Source: Michael Brandman Associates,2007. • • ® Exhibit 5 . II® Site Photographs 5g and 5h Michael Brandman Associate:. 23060012 •0212007 15_site_ohotos_(5g)and(5h).cdr A,B,&C- 77 INITIAL STUDY, EAST AVENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, OF. • 5.m lx�FY1ft *r City of Rancho Cucamonga • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND -' 1. Project File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 2. Related Files: n/a 3. Description of Project: A proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210)-APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. VARIANCE DRC2009-00020 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - A request to allow perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the maximum wall height permitted in residential districts, for noise attenuation purposes along the perimeter of a proposed 76-lot subdivision with a combined area of about 53 acres in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway . (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Tree -Removal Permit • DRC2009-00224. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2009-00224 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT -A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant • parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Variance • DRC2009-00020. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Mike Harrison, Director Operations and Planning Chaffey Joint Union High School District 211 W 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 5. General Plan Designation: Very Low Residential 6. Zoning: Very Low(VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project area consists of five (5) parcels with a . combined area of approximately 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 940 feet (north to south). The . __ site is vacant. There are numerous trees within and along the property lines of the individual parcels that comprise the project site. The eastern half of the combined property is mostly low vegetation. To the north of the western half of the project site, there are single-family residences. • To the north of the eastern half of the site, there is vacant property where a subdivision into residential lots (Tract 17651) was recently approved. To the west, are additional single-family residences. To the south is a vacant parcel that is owned by Caltrans and used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. A,B,&C- 78 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 2 Beyond this parcel is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). To the east are vacant parcels. The zoning • of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,455 feet and 1,400 feet, respectively. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith, Associate Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG—Reactive Organic Gases • • • PM10—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB— Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G — Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x)Aesthetics (x)Agricultural Resources (x)Air Quality (x) Biological Resources (x)Cultural Resources (x) Geology& Soils (x) Greenhouse Gas Emissions ( ) Hazards &Waste Materials (x) Hydrology&Water Quality (x) Land Use & Planning ( ) Mineral Resources (x) Noise ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( )Transportation/Traffic ( ) Utilities & Service Systems (x) Mandatory Findings of Significance • DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there • will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. A,B,&C- 79 Initial Study for J City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT1§ f � / Page 3 • Prepared By: � Date: 81/277/(' Reviewed By 91g4/_ _ __L Date: f//Z-4/ • • • • A,B,&C- 80 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 4 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? " ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho • Cucamonga. c) The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by limited residential • development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) to the south. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. The property will be developed with single-family residences similar to those in the surrounding area. The architecture of the homes will be required to be consistent with the design standards and policies established by the Planning Commission and City Council. They will also be required to comply with technical requirements including maximum building height, minimum setbacks, and maximum lot coverage as described in the Etiwanda Specific Plan to ensure that the site is not overbuilt. Although homes are not part of this application, they must be submitted for review and approval by the City at a future date. Approval by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission will be required prior to approval of the homes. Also, City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. Lastly, existing trees will be required to be preserved in-place to the maximum extent possible. d) Homes are not part of this application. However, when the project site is developed with houses, the project will increase the number of street lights and residential lighting used in • the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of street lights will be required to • comply with City standards including requirements for shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Residential lighting is generally not a source of substantial glare as such lighting is limited to within the confines of the home. Exterior residential lighting will be required to comply with City standards for maximum height and setbacks for light • poles. The impact is not considered significant. • A,B,&C- 81 • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 5 • Less Than Significant Less any With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Signifi cant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (V) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? • b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in • conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as .Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by limited residential development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) to the south. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to General Plan Table RC-2. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use . Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. • c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are . zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. A,B,&C-. 82 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 6 Less Than • • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With is PP g Significant Incorporated Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by limited residential development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) to the south. There are no agricultural uses within one mile of the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is not potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: • a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) • any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (I) ( ) ( ) • concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the ability of the region to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. According to the Air Quality Analysis Report prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on July 11, 2011, the project will not exceed the SCAQMD regional significance emission thresholds during construction or operation; the construction emissions from the project would not exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD localized significance thresholds; the project is consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP); the project would not result in a cumulative impact; and the project would not create objectionable odors that affect sensitive receptors. b) Both the State of California and the federal government have established health-based • ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (S02), coarse A,B,&C- 83 • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 7 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigaton Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM15), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2,5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2,5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H25), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind • speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2,5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM10 and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Analysis Report prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on July 11, 2011 that utilizes the Urban Emissions Model URBEMIS 2007 Version 9.2.4 methodology and CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993 to evaluate short-term construction emissions • and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Green House Gas Emissions. A,B,&C- 84 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 8 Less Than • Significant Less Pdedal vtn Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact °v r ' 3 s" "� Emisslons ,(pounds-pe:.r day I A _ sSQ, y PYMg FMA ? Mass Grading 4 34 20 0 20 6 Fine Grading 4 34 20 0 20 6 Trenching 2 18 10 0 1 1 Asphalt Paving 8 38 20 0 2 2 Building 5 22 38 0 2 1 Construction Architectural 50 0 5 0 0 0 Coating Maximum Daily 50 38 38 0 20 6 Emissions Significance 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Significant No No No No No No Impact? Note: The maximum daily emissions refer to the maximum emissions that would occur in one day; it was assumed that the grading activities do not occur at the same time as the other construction activities; therefore, their emissions are not summed. VOC = • volatile organic compounds NOx= oxides of nitrogen CO = carbon monoxide SOx= oxides of sulfur PMio and PM2.5= particulate matter Source: URBEMIS output,Appendix A. Short Term (Construction) Impacts Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction . activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 • precursors. This is a residential subdivision; however, the homes are not included with this proposal and will be submitted for review and constructed at a later date. Based on the A,B,&C- 85 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 9 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant corporate Significant Impact _Incorporated Impact Impact proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed buildings will result in approximately 50 lbs of VOC per day during the coating phase. The emissions would occur after grading activities, near the end of the construction period. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Emissions associated with architectural coatings could be reduced by using precoated/natural-colored building materials, using water-based or low-VOC coating, and using coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency. For example, a high-volume, low-pressure (HVLP) spray method is a coating application system operated at air pressure between 0.1 and 10 pounds per square inch gauge (psig), with 65 percent transfer efficiency. Manual applications such as paintbrush, and roller trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge have 100 percent transfer efficiency. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses • • would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos • The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) on a project- specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: • • 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per A,B,&C- 86 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 10 Less Than • Significant Less Potentially w , Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant corporate Significant Impact - Impact Incotooratetl Impact pa manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and • watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • . Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be • applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or -- - more to reduce PM10 emissions. A,B,&C- 87 . Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 11 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant corporate Significant Impact Incomoratetl Imoad Impact 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. • 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (No2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM15 and PMig) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Lone Term (Operational) Impacts • Lonq Term Project Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of residential structures and uses in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile • source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. Based on trip generation factors included in the Air Quality Study prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on July 11, 2011, long-term operation emissions associated with the proposed project, calculated with the URBEMIS 2007 shows that the increase of all criteria pollutants as a result of the proposed project would be less than the corresponding SCAQMD daily emission thresholds. Therefore, project- related long-term air quality impacts would not be significant. Mitigation measures would not be required. • Table 9: Operational Emissions (Summer) Emission (pounds per day) • Source VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 • Area 5 1 4 0 0 0 Sources Vehicles 9 14 123 0 25 5 Total 14 15 127 0 25 5 Significant 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold • Significant No No No No No No Impact • A,B,&C- 88 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 12 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Table 9: Operational Emissions (Winter) Emission (pounds per day) Source VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2,5 • Area 4 2 1 0 0 0 Sources Vehicles 11 16 115 0 25 5 • Total 15 18 116 0 25 5 Significant 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Significant No No No No No No Impact • 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures(long term) ' Lonq Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. • 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR • identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3)., . A,B,&C- 89 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 13 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Incorporated Impact Impact c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic • facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located immediately adjacent to residences. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. • 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with • South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction Odors (short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would be from cooking and gardening. Similarly common odors associated with mixed-use and commercial land uses would be expected (i.e. restaurants). . Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and, therefore, are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish • and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local • or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? A,B,&C- 90 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 14 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than c pp 9 Significant Mitigation Significant Impact 'Incorporated Impact Impact c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) (V) ( O protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) • protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( )• ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? • Comments: a) The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the • Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by limited residential development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210)to the south. The site has been'minimally disrupted along the west perimeter for partial construction of East Avenue and along the south perimeter for an access road. The project site is located within a habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources -the Coastal California Gnatcatcher (CAGN), the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR), and Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS). According to the-Biological Resources Assessment Report prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on March 4, 2011, a RAFSS plant community covers approximately 2.9 acres of the project site. The remainder of the site contains Coastal sage scrub (21.7 acres) and non-native grasses (28.5 acres). The following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1) The applicant shall purchase at a 1:1 ratio 2.9 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub RAFSS habitat designated for conservation or pay in-lieu fees. Evidence of applicable mitigation agreements approved by CDEG shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of grading permits. According to the Biological Resources Assessment Report prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on September 8, 2008, no SBKR were trapped and SBKR-was determined not to be present on the project site in during a trapping survey conducted in June 2005; a subsequent survey was conducted in July 2008 and the results were negative. According to the same Biological Resources Assessment Report, CAGN was not observed within the project site and the species was considered to be absent from the • project site; a set of subsequent surveys were conducted in April - June 2008 and the .results were negative. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: A,B,&C- 91 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 15 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant corporate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Imoeq 2) The applicant shall conduct focused surveys to determine the presence/absence of this species following protocols established by the United States Fish and Wild Life Services (USFWS) prior to grading or other ground disturbance of the site. In the event that SBKR is detected or observed within the area of disturbance, avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures shall be developed and implemented through consultation with the USFWS under Section 10 of the FESA (or Section 7 as appropriate). Mitigation measures shall include the purchase/conservation of off-site suitable habitat that is known to support SBKR at a minimum 1:1 ratio depending on the quality of habitat removed compared to the quality of habitat provided. Specific ratios will be determined in consultation with USFWS. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide copies of applicable species mitigation agreements or permits to the City. 3) The applicant shall conduct focused surveys to determine the • presence/absence of this species following protocols established by the USFWS prior to grading or other ground disturbance of the site. In the event that CAGN is detected or observed within the area of disturbance, avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures shall be developed and implemented through consultation with the USFWS under Section 10 of the FESA (or Section 7 as appropriate). Mitigation measures shall include the • timing of construction activities outside of the breeding season (February 15 to August 31) and/or purchase/conservation of off-site suitable habitat that is known to support CAGN at a minimum 1:1 ratio depending on the quality of habitat removed compared to the quality of habitat provided. Specific ratios will be determined in consultation with USFWS. Prior to the issuance of grading,permits, the developer shall provide copies of applicable species mitigation agreements or permits to the City. 4) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided by an appropriate buffer, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. There is suitable habitat for Plummer's mariposa lily, Parry's spineflower, and mesa horkelia. According to a focused plant survey conducted in June 2008, Plummer's mariposa lily (175 individual plants) was determined to be present throughout the eastern portion of the site. Parry's spineflower and mesa horkelia were not observed within the project site. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented: • • 5) The applicant shall prepare a mitigation plan containing provisions requiring the transplantation and/or seeding of Plummer's mariposa lily plants to an off-site protected area suitable for supporting Plummer's mariposa lily. The A,B,&C- 92 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 16 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact• number of transplants/seeding shall be equal or greater than the 175 plants existing on the property. This mitigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City prior to the issuance of grading permits and shall be done in coordination with the CDFG. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. c) According to the Biological Resources Assessment Report prepared • by Michael Brandman Associates on March 4, 2011, the site contains a single non-wetland drainage feature that runs north to south through the center of the project site. The drainage is a wholly intra-state feature with no downstream connectivity to navigable waters and no existing or probable use in interstate commerce. Per a letter dated February 24, 2011. The Army Corp of Engineers (USACOE) evaluated the project and determined that there are no jurisdictional waters of the United States on the project site. Therefore, it is not subject to Federal jurisdiction under Sections 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Because the drainage does not contain waters of the United States within the meaning of 33 CFR 328.3, the feature will not be subject to RWQCB jurisdiction under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The drainage does have a definable streambed and is therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the CDFG. This drainage feature includes approximately 0.06 acre of "waters of the state." Impact to the drainage would require a permit from the CDFG (Streambed Alteration Agreement). Notwithstanding the isolation of the feature, if • the water provides beneficial uses to the state, the RWQCB may assert jurisdiction of the drainage as "waters of the state" pursuant to provisions of the State Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 6) Necessary permits from the relevant regulatory agencies (CDFG, RWQCB) must be obtained for impacts to jurisdictional features and/or waters. Required permits will likely include Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement and processing a Report of Waste Discharge Requirements. Grading in non-jurisdictional areas of the site may be allowed prior to obtaining the permits, provided that such grading will not impact jurisdictional waters. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall provide evidence of applicable permits to the City. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. However, • according to the Biological Resources Assessment prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on March 4, 2011, the project site has development to the west, a concrete flood control channel on the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) to the south. Also, to the north there is ongoing construction of a residential subdivision. As such, the project site does not represent an area that would link two or more significant wildlife areas and wildlife are not likely to utilize the project site as a wildlife corridor. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are heritage trees, including numerous Eucaplyptus trees planted in windrows, on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is in conflict with the City's Tree • Preservation Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to preserve as many trees on the • project site as possible. However, there are some trees that will be required to be removed to allow grading, the construction of homes, and/or the construction of A,B,&C- 93 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 17 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially with man Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant rpre Significant No Impact Incorporated Imoacl Impact Community and Local Feeder trails. The applicant has submitted an application to remove these trees — Related Me: Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. To mitigate the impact of the removal of the trees, the applicant shall: 7) Trees that are removed shall be replaced on a one-to-one basis with a matching species of a minimum 15-gallon size. 8) Tree planting shall follow the requirements established in the Etiwanda Specific Plan regarding windrow replacement. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State habitat conservation plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (7) ( ) ( ) • significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. • b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho • Cucamonga will: A,B,&C- 94 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 18 • Less Than - • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With than Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorpoated Impact Impact • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. ▪ Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on • an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating• for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the • appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed • salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor -- • of the find. - -' A,B,&C- 95 • • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 19 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant coiporat Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by limited residential development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210)to the south. The site has been minimally disrupted along the west perimeter for partial construction of East Avenue and along the south perimeter for an access road. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence . to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: • a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: • i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? • A,B,&C- 96 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 20 Less Than • Significant Less •Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant n ct corootlon Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes approximately 1 mile northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 2.5 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 11.5 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 13.5 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing • sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust • control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and • landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM.,g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMip emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM1g emissions. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside • Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and • Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an A,B,&C- 97 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 21 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand (SpC) Soil association and Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam (HaC) according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand (SpC) Soil association and Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam (HaC) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project proposes the installation of septic systems that will be required to be permitted by the City's Building and Safety Department and meet all related environmental regulations. Additionally, the project shall be required to comply with Chapter 5 of the Santa Ana Region Basin Plan. If the site is unsuitable for the installation of septic systems, the applicant shall be required to connect to.the City's existing sewer system per Section 4.7.6 Threshold 4.7e of the General Plan that limits the number of septic systems if the site is overlain by Cieneba and Ramona soil types. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. .Would the project: • a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) • Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) greenhouse gases? Comments: a) Regulations and Significance - The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N2O], hydroflourocarbons [HFCs], perflourocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]. The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees • Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in A,B,&C- 98 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 22 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant corporan Significant pa ImWCt Incorporated Impact Impact 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a quantitative based standard (CEQA 15064.4). - • Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PM10, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Proiect Related Sources of GHG's- Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards,'contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental . plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality Analysis prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on July 11, 2011 the project would result in the following emissions of carbon dioxide [002], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N2O], and hydroflourocarbons [HFCs] and would not result in the other- • GHG's - (perfiourocarbons [PFCs] and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]). As seen in the tables below the proposed project would result in a total of 429 MTCO2eq/yr from construction activities; 1,115 MTCO2eq/yr from operational activities; and 2,439 MTCO2eq/yr for mobile ., A,B,&C- 99 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incbmorated Impact Impact sources. Total project related emissions would result in 3,568 MTCO2eq/yr (construction, operational, and mobile combined). Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions -The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel- powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Construction greenhouse gas emissions are: Source Emissions Emissions (tons of carbon dioxide) (MTCO2e) Mass Grading 103 93 Fine Grading 47 43 • Trenching 9 — 8 Paving 17 15 • Building Construction (1st Year) 251 228 Building Construction (2nd Year) 43 39 Architectural Coating 3 3 Total 473 429 • Average (30 years) 16 14 Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2. The construction contactor shall select construction equipment based on low- emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the • grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. A,B,&C- 100 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 24 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Potentially Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 3. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7. To conserve water and to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan, the following measures shall be implemented: a. The installation of recycled water irrigation systems, i.e. dual distribution systems, is required to allow for future use of recycled water. b. Low flow appliances, i.e. toilets, dishwashers, showerheads, washing machines, etc. shall be installed if provided by the builder. c. A minimum of 50 percent of the landscape palette shall contain drought- • resistant species. • d. .Turf (grass) shall not be used as a landscape feature in the common/public/shared areas; however, turf is allowed in the activity areas(s) in community parks (if any). e. The quantity of grass/turf shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the landscaped portion in the front yards. There shall be no minimum amount of grass/turf imposed anywhere on the site. B. The project shall incorporate enough points to be certified in Build-it-Green (builditgreen.org) or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). However, the project does not need to be officially 'certified' to reduce cost associated with the certification. 9. The project shall incorporate the following measures to reduce energy use: a. Plant shade trees within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet of the west sides of properties. b. All units shall be constructed to be able to easily convert to solar power, i.e. solar ready. c. Photovoltaic cells (solar panels), tankless water heaters, and solar powered water heaters shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option, or installed. • • A,B,&C- 101 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 25 • - Less Than Significant Less Potentially Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Mitigation Significant nt No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d. Each appliance, i.e. washers, dryers refrigerators, stoves, etc. provided by the builder must be Energy Star qualified if an Energy Star designation is applicable for that appliance. 10. The following measures shall be included in the site plan to reduce motor vehicle emissions and to be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan: a. There is a Class II Bike Lane on East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan Bicycle Plan. The project shall contribute 100 percent of the funds the City required to construct a Class II Bike Lane on the eastern portion of East Avenue adjacent to the project or the project applicant shall construct it. b. The project shall include appropriate and safe bicycle connections from the Bike Lane on East Avenue to the project site. c. There shall be pedestrian sidewalks on both sides of the streets in the project site. d. The project shall install a pedestrian sidewalk on the eastern portion of • East Avenue adjacent to the project site. e. The project shall contain pedestrian connections to the uses adjacent to the project site. • Lonq Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on calculations for each GHG source and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. Operational greenhouse gas emissions are: Source Emissions (MTCO2e) Motor Vehicles 2,439 Natural Gas 262 Indirect Electricity 468 • Water Transport 67 • Waste 69 A,B,&C- 102 Initial Study for • City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 26 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact • Refrigerants 249 Subtotal—Operations Total 3,554 • Subtotal —Construction Total 14 •(Average 30 years) Total (Operations + Construction) 3,568 The project the subdivision of five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including fiber optic communications infrastructure, on-street bike lanes, sidewalks, fire defensible space, and water efficient landscaping. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the • CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The developer of the proposed project will be required to provide fiber optic communications infrastructure, on-street bike lanes, sidewalks, fire defensible space, and water efficient landscaping. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. The project's long term operation greenhouse gas emissions will contribute to area • pollutants and will exceed the SCAQMD's thresholds. However, the proposed project would have less than a significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1. Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and • landscaping, - -- - A,B,&C- 103 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 27 • - Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially ignifl any With Than pp g Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 3. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available andlor install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 5. To conserve water and to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan, the following measures shall be implemented: a. The installation of recycled water irrigation systems, i.e. dual distribution systems, is required to allow for future use of recycled water. b. Low flow appliances, i.e. toilets, dishwashers, showerheads, washing machines, etc. shall be installed if provided by the builder. c. A minimum of 50 percent of the landscape palette shall contain drought- resistant species. d. Turf (grass) shall not be used as a landscape feature in the common/public/shared areas; however, turf is allowed in the activity areas(s) in community parks(if any). e. The quantity of grass/turf shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the landscaped portion in the front yards. There shall be no minimum • amount of grass/turf imposed anywhere on the site. A,B,&C- 104 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 28 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact ' Impact • 6. The project shall incorporate enough points to be certified in Build-it-Green (builditgreen.org) or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). However, the project does not need to be officially `certified' to reduce cost associated with the certification. 7. The project shall incorporate the following measures to reduce energy use: a. Plant shade trees within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet of the west sides of properties. b. All units shall be constructed to be able to easily convert to solar power, i.e. solar ready. c. Photovoltaic cells (solar panels), tankless water heaters, and solar powered water heaters shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option, or installed. d. Each appliance, i.e. washers, dryers refrigerators, stoves, etc. provided by the builder must be Energy Star qualified if an Energy Star designation is applicable for that appliance. 8. The following measures shall be included in the site plan to reduce motor • vehicle emissions and to be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan: a. There is a Class II Bike Lane on East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan Bicycle Plan. The project shall contribute 100 percent of the funds the City required to construct a Class II Bike Lane on the eastern portion of East Avenue adjacent to the project or the project applicant shall construct it. b. The project shall include appropriate and safe bicycle connections from the Bike Lane on East Avenue to the project site. c. There shall be pedestrian sidewalks on both sides of the streets in the project site. d. The project shall install a pedestrian sidewalk on the eastern portion of East Avenue adjacent to the project site. e. The project shall contain pedestrian connections to the uses adjacent to the project site. The proposed project will result in 3,568 MTCO2eq/yr total project-related emissions without reduction from project design features. Based on the reduction measures proposed for the project and the Mitigation Measures the project would reduce its GHG emission below the "business as usual" scenario by 5% as shown below. AB 32 requires • the reduction of GHG emissions to 1990 levels, which would require a minimum 28.5 • percent reduction in "business as usual" GHG emissions for the entire state. • A,B,&C- 105 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 29 • • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Source Emissions (MTCO2e per Year) Unmitigated Reduction Mitigated Motor Vehicles 2,439 5% (122) 2,317 Natural Gas 262 5% (13) 249 Indirect Electricity 468 10% (47) 421 Water Transport 67 5% (3) 64 Waste 69 0 69 Refrigerants 249 0 249 Subtotal— 3,554 185 3,369 Operations Total Subtotal — Construction Total 14 0 14 (Average 30 years) • Total (Operations + 3,568 185 3,383 • Construction) SCAQMD Draft 3,500 - 3,500 Threshold Significant Impact Yes - No • b) The project proposes the subdivision of five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots — the construction of homes is not proposed at this time. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re- use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes divers opportunities. The developer of the proposed project will be required to provide fiber optic communications infrastructure, on-street bike lanes, sidewalks, fire defensible space, and water efficient landscaping and therefore is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant • unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly(AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. • A,B,&C- 106 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 30 Less Than • • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g Significant coWithon Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset • and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the • project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in &safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) - adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) (✓) ( ) () loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or • where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil. Additionally, through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant • impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. A,B,&C- 107 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 31 • • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With an PP g s: Significannt t corporate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There is a school, Summit Intermediate Junior High School, Iodated 'approximately 1/4 mile north of the project site at 6061 East Avenue. The project will be required to comply with existing State and Federal standards on the use and transport of hazardous materials. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping • of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. • e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public • airport. The project site is located approximately 6.5 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances;no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City. The project is located with the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. The City recognizes the risk and has adopted policies and Standard Conditions that limit uses to Very Low density residential development and Hillside residential uses in these areas to limit property exposed to wildland fire hazards. The project shall prepare a Fire Protection Plan to outline appropriate measures to address fire hazards. Therefore, the following wildland fire mitigation measure shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The project shall comply with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code • (CBC), which includes building standards for the Wildand-Urban Interface Fire Area. The standards call for the use of ignition-resistant materials and design to inhibit the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a A,B,&C- 108 Initial Study for - . City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 32 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With han Significant Signincenl Mitigation Significant Impact No Impact Incorporated ImpImpact vegetation fire and help reduce losses resulting from repeated cycles of interface fire disasters. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) ( ) (1) ( ) requirements? • b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would • drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the • course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation • map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge • Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water A,B,&C- 109 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 33 • Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of • erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. • A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). To comply with the NPDES, the construction • contractor of the project will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by the applicant's representatives on October 20, 2008, which identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: • 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities • entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to A,B,&C- 110 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 34 Less Than • • Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact t Impact • control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared on October 20,2008, by the applicant's representative to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Post- Construction Operational: • 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by the applicant's representative on October 20, 2008, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers 1pesticideslherbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater • Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be approximately 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. • c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape A,B,&C- 111 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 35 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by • the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NO1) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm • Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. • g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure P5-5. No adverse impacts are expected. A,B,&C- 112 • Initial Study for • City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 36 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g ouce Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) • b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) • ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by limited residential development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) to the south. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the northwest. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Very Low Residential. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is for 76 lots which will be developed, at a later date, with single-family residences. The development of the site with residences will be consistent.with the land use designations as described in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the General Plan. The dwelling unit density of the subdivision, subdivision layout, and the individual lot sizes and dimensions are consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the General Plan. As • such, no impacts are anticipated. A,B,&C- 113 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 37 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by limited residential development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210)to the south. The site has been minimally disrupted along the west perimeter for partial construction of East Avenue and along the south perimeter for an access road. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources — the Coastal California • Gnatcatcher(CAGN), the San'Bernardino Kangaroo Rat(SBKR), and Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS).. The mitigation measures and discussion as indicated in Section 4, Biological Resources, a) 1 —5 shall reduce the impact to less-than-significant. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: • a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to•the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. • 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? _ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport and use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the • project area to excessive noise levels? A,B,&C- 114 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 38 Less Than - • Significant Less . Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than pp 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No - Impact Incorporated Impact Impact f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. The project site is adjacent to the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and East Avenue. The freeway surface is below grade to allow the freeway to pass beneath the East Avenue roadway near the west side of the project site. Further to the east the freeway surface, is closer to the elevation of the project site. East Avenue is slightly above the elevation of the project site. The applicant has submitted an application for a variance to allow perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the • maximum wall height permitted in residential districts, for noise attenuation purposes (Variance DRC2009-00020). According to the Preliminary Noise Assessment prepared by • Mestre Greve Associates on October 9, 2008, the following mitigation measure will reduce the noise impacts caused by the freeway to less-than-significant levels: Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise • mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The • Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. • • 2) The applicant shall construct an 8 foot — 22 foot - high noise barrier block wall along the south, east, and west perimeters of the project site for noise attenuation purposes. The height and location of these walls shall be constructed per Exhibit 7 of the Preliminary Noise Assessment. These walls shall be fully constructed simultaneously with the development of the site and prior to occupancy of any of the homes. Interior: Specific mitigation measures for interior noise impacts are not possible at this time as the project does not include a house product. Mitigations measures cannot be established without knowing the design of the houses. Therefore: 3) When an application for the development of homes on the project site is submitted, the applicant (current or future) shall submit a noise assessment to determine the required mitigations measures to reduce the noise impacts to levels of less significance. b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. There may be short term construction related vibration. However, the applicant will be required to follow all City requirements regarding construction activities. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The • proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 — Transportation/Traffic and therefore will not likely increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. A,B,&C- 115 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 39 • • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant corporae Significant Impact Impact Incorporated Impact pa d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 6) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first • phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measure shall then be required: 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The site is located approximately 6.5 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is off-set north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. • A,B,&C- 116 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 40 • Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Tian Significant corporae Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Imeecl 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: • a) The project site is located in an area that is generally undeveloped with limited residential development to the north and west. A residential development is under construction on the property to the north. The alignment of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) is to the south. The project is located in a predominantly developed area and proposes the subdivision of the property into 76 lots for future residential construction. Although the project will increase the population growth in the area there will be a less than significant impact as the project is consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation which density was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Construction • activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is vacant. Because the property is vacant, there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. c) The project site is vacant. Because the property is vacant, there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new • or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: • a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • - Comments: a) The site, located at the northeast corner of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway . • (SR-210), would be served by a fire station located approximately 1.5 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration A,B,&C- 117 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 41 • Less Than -. • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wim Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact tncoroorated • Impact Impact of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) The increase in residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the 'school impact fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. • • d) The project site is located in an area that is generally undeveloped with limited residential • development to the north and west. A residential development is under construction on the property to the north. However, there is a park, Etiwanda Creek Park, is located 0.40 mile north from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new • facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative • development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less-than-significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that • substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect • on the environment? A,B,&C- 118 • • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 42 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: - a) The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by limited residential development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) to the south. However, there is a park, Etiwanda Creek Park, is located 0.40 mile north from the project site at 5939 East Avenue. This project is not proposing a substantial number of new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 16. .TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into . account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but • not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: • a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 988 vehicle trips daily. The proposed project contemplates the subdivision of the property which will allow for the development of 76 lots. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each residence will generate 13 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), • continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with A,B,&C- 119 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 43 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant nt Impact Incorporated Impact Impact street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each residence will generate 1.75 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street • improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 6.5 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport, the site is off-set north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by limited residential development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210)to the south. The site has been minimally disrupted along•the west perimeter for partial construction of East Avenue and along the south perimeter for an access road. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project is residential. Although houses are not part of the proposal, when the houses are submitted for review, adequate parking, specifically an enclosed garage and a • driveway, in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code will be required. No impacts are anticipated. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? • b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing • facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? • A,B,&C- 120 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 44 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Thfc PP g Significant coWithOn Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project; that it • has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by • the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding • wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No • • impacts are anticipated. A,B,&C- 121 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 45 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding • solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ,( ) ( ) (• ) ( ) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the • habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? • Comments: a) The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by limited residential development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) to the south. The site is located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. The site has been minimally disrupted along the west perimeter for partial construction of East Avenue and along the south perimeter for an access road. The project site is located within a habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources — the Coastal California Gnatcatcher (CAGN), the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat(SBKR), and Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS). According to the Biological Resources Assessment Report prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on March 4, 2011, a RAFSS plant community covers approximately 2.9 acres of the project site. The remainder of the site contains Coastal sage scrub • (21.7 acres) and non-native grasses (28.5 acres). No SBKR were trapped and SBKR was determined not to be present on the project site in during a trapping survey conducted in June 2005; a subsequent survey was conducted in July 2008 and the results were negative. CAGN was not observed within the project site and the species was considered A,B,&C- 122 Initial Study for • City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP,SUBTT18122 Page 46 Less Than • Significant Less Potent" With Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significnt Mitigation Significant nt Impact Incorporated Impact Impact to be absent from the project site; a set of subsequent surveys were conducted in April — June 2008 and the results were negative. There is suitable habitat for Plummer's mariposa lily, Parry's spineflower, and mesa horkelia. According to a focused plant survey conducted in June 2008, Plummer's mariposa lily (175 individual plants) was determined to be present throughout the eastern portion of the site. Parry's spineflower and mesa horkelia were not observed within the project site. The site contains a single non-wetland drainage feature that runs north to south through the center of the project site. The drainage is a wholly intra-state feature with no downstream connectivity to navigable waters and no existing or probable'use in interstate commerce. Per a letter dated February 24, 2011. The Army Corp of Engineers (USACOE) evaluated the project and determined that there are no jurisdictional waters of the United States on the project site. Therefore, it is not subject to Federal jurisdiction under Sections 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Because the drainage does not contain waters of the United States within the meaning of 33 CFR 328.3, the feature will not be subject to RWQCB jurisdiction under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The drainage does have a definable streambed and is therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the CDFG. This drainage feature includes approximately 0.06 acre of "waters of the state." Impact to the drainage would require a permit from the CDFG (Streambed Alteration Agreement). Notwithstanding the isolation of the feature, if the water provides beneficial uses to the state, the RWQCB may assert jurisdiction of the drainage as "waters of the state" pursuant to provisions of the State Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented: • There are heritage trees, including numerous Eucaplyptus trees planted in windrows, on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is in conflict with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to preserve as many trees on the project site as possible. However, there are some trees that will be required to be removed to allow grading, the construction of homes, and/or the construction of Community and Local Feeder trails. The applicant has submitted an application to remove these trees — Related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. • c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial . adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies A,B,&C- 123 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 47 • - Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels; the loss of sensitive biological habitat; and increased greenhouse gases. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one • or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) • • (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) • (T) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) (T) Etiwanda North Specific Plan EIR (SCH #89012314, certified April 1, 1992) (T) Updated Air Quality Analysis Report Michael Brandman Associates, July 11, 2011 (hardcopy to South Coast Air Quality Management District; all others refer to attached CD) (T) Greenhouse Gas Analysis Report Michael Brandman Associates, July 7, 2011 . . (hardcopy to South Coast Air Quality Management District; all others refer to attached CD) (T) Updated Biological Resources Assessment Report Michael Brandman Associates, March 4, 2011 (hardcopy to California Department of Fish and Game; all others refer to attached CD) (T) Delineation of Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands • Michael Brandman Associates, December 2, 2010 (hardcopies to California Department of Fish and Game and California Regional Water Quality Control Board; all others refer to attached CD) A,B,&C- 124 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 48 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant cMitigation Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (T) Correspondence from US Army Corp of Engineers regarding Jurisdictional Determination US Army Corp of Engineers, February 24, 2011 (hardcopies to California Department of Fish and Game and California Regional Water Quality Control Board; all others refer to attached CD) (T) San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Presence/Absence Trapping Studies Michael Brandman Associates, September 9, 2008 (hardcopy to California Department of Fish and Game; all others refer to attached CD) (T) Coastal California Gnatcatcher Focused Survey Michael Brandman Associates, September 8, 2008 (hardcopy to California Department of Fish and Game; all others refer to attached CD) (T) Preliminary Noise Assessment - Mestre Greve Associates, October 9, 2008 (T) Tree Survey and Arborist Report Michael Brandman Associates, May 15, 2007 (T) Water Quality Management Plan By the Applicant, October 20, 2008 • • A,B,&C- 125 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 49 Leas Men Signdicard less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: �P0 ilk M ,,,,,`o",,,s, sue„ 10 Impeu Incorporated Imped • Impact • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearllyy/no significant/environmental effects would occur. /)/, Applicant's Signature//��U/ `/l��,l�� -- Date: ///2// o/1 Print Name and Title: • en/ %�/ !!! V • • • • A,B, & C - 126 s ' . City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING c4s .l. PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 A,B,&C- 127 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTT18122, DRC2009-00020 AND DRC2009-00224 — MIKE HARRISON —CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Page 2 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. • 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached • hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • • A,B,&C- 128 c0 ' t'3 w _ c 110 H .- o m 0 �' i. V Nr 7 (/) co Z y.j..,, N N N N N I 11•1.S.. :. zv_q N Ii ii,:- per. > _ 0 t an . m dal" M ° w , ; = O N > 0 a,„,* t,=• C 1•. M O Cl c �� - 4 N s. O C r„� O. 'C d Cu C d O V s 0 • N ti, a, U a a Cl) a rn an - Ca rn ="ur. C C C C C —/ i Ct co a7 a) a3 c -. �: n a n a Ti Q C 0 O T ss O w ` O o O O o C1 = .� N N N N a) I- f/) rn >, ; E J c t 7 CO Y « ' k r w fri W p m k O ? 53' U o U 0] U U L. C C7 o t c Ili o Z m W r C d c c - ', O O s:= O O N w m g- • • h- W lE I.w a a 0 m m'- I ° 1.4 .`Z I— o irlota o m N 3- v m = -o in w a) 4---0 a) C u) .: c Z.2, ri o 4) O = �}' o c 0) c C .c .L+ ._ a) 5 O m U o _ - a) 'O c Q , 0 g co o .. U � 'g ' 3 512_45 mU a: p � t CO o).. m -o ' y a 0) 2 2 o o c m cti Tii a C7 0 to ) a E a= ° D a) w r > >' N U o co V) � � 'p o w n� amp w c°� ` � co) ¢ a) oo L. U r 4 m d o o d C O C .>' N m mm moo : ° , co 3 t2t m Tc _C I- Y Em - a ` m 'v ° oonCa el a) o ao F— I- m'l4 moo c mooc° C _ .N2s Um t E >: S N e a t a o 0 0).- -o -. E 'J m - W - o 0 ` > - � N co U n a) >, ` L OU O C E O a L .0 a n U C - >, ur; a) U ` C O m w C E • O 0 U CU o v v v v N 2 N N N N C V V C V V -a- co Cu w 'O C a) C a) a .- CD @ > D C O 0 '.-- 'O Cu O 0 L F- t � • > a as 0 Q CC Q C C Q 0 co co U) co N U) Cu co co co ca @ 15 o n n n a a c a 0 o a °' : o `0 0 0 0 o mcf6i 3 3 3 3 3 rn2 m2 0)� m ? CD 7 C w N O • N . C y C y C U) C y C C)� O a) . . @ O a) @ J O J O O J O J O a) P. > m CL m m K D 0 J U U U D o O U m O0 T • C o C CD 0 • 7 r 00 2 aL U U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co m c 3 o c c c O 0 a2 in K• ° m m m m m m m m m m m d N C V -o U -.c (/) ,N P. O O ._ C a) • m 0 m . O L L C D 'C C O @ o - O .E J O @ U) a a@ > U V O cn O 0 ❑ O O O 2 O U L ai 3 O co �.,� O L d can) in a) .C. O c@ O o O C C.) N cs N E 0 -0 E 2 C n vo U a E � ° m ° E t o :012- d0> E Q o o u � C @ a) c N -0 co 0 .O U > a) (0 a) N a) a) 0 L a) 2 L@ @ J@ U) N L @ O) @ In o > > N a) U D - -0 a) U) O O N r 0) C O C 3 T:.+ O a) L CD N a a) C a) L C ._ cn L N T'O la U L N -C 'U J N@ j U U @ o C a) J L L @ d @ C O) O a) N E C @ N Vl > a _O a N w if -0 m V > C O) J N O C T L- C C X C O CO O@ U) 3 co E o L co 3 0 O` @ o f C y N 'O 'o C C in • U O -o O@ J a O L a a) Cu C x ED 0 O)C " � •ON 7 •C T �) dC2a N Cl.) V! O'to O U 3 > 0 0 CO U. C@ U a) l` C) `/Cr N a @ a 0 0 -o > O. 0 2 a d ma) `� aUd Boa � 5 � mU @ � in .2 U -o N C C@ > a 0 0 a) 0 0 OU •N O O 0 0 0 J > T j CS a) Q@ C @ m 0 J YO - N L_ U U 0 ° O) cOj R O N C fa .0 Q .N co C O C a) 7 U O` C7) O 2 > N , @ C X a) C_ U N L w J N L a) C N O 3 N Q o):0 T C '� U _ 3 a Ul > • "O a) = 1._ C — @ c� O to L f0 'N U O Cu -co a) a V O` @ x "O 0 a) O) 0 _ N" >. = N V O! E U) a) @ O L to _— E E O co. a) m N a to a) a) O U C Z'w @ O O) a) @ Y L O)+' N S_ co a) ...7,: w E a = CO rno 57 . dma� CULE = cam cUE co c @c3 OLD o • L J N O 0I 3 C a� E O a) o N ` O N N m O a) y 'o w a O E C N a) J N U) 0 ' r L a) N o C - N J N 0@ a) O Y O. O a) O . N a-O C — co 2] @ U co @ m Y a m E am) O m a n a a `O N 0 c 3 To E o u' cU 'ci m 5 'co co c -@O` — 0 co o co ' rn °—) it -.E, a a@ W a) 3 O @a) O) n .L.. F- U co 3v) 2LV No -o Eat/Jo UE i. o. a) _ O) N 0 a) > @ J a)en 2 E ,. . . F N i o co U m co it FL- co A,B,&C- 130 U w • a • E c 0 U N O � V V V �' V R ' co Z N N N N N N "'t°'=' N 0 TO P -O C ;;.,-4 a) C a F wc > 0 ic; H k ✓a2a,. a > a U 0 0 0 0 ,`1? 0 k to O O a U) m :C w • c C c c c c i C @ @ @ Cu @ Cu @ • C a a O. a a a !t.., -. a o ' a. O 'r. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CS C t a) N a) o a) N ' N > > > .5 .> > ° a) a) a) a) a) k`ft E m aa' :;Via: Di > '. Co C ,^ux{ ` C v—_ CD 7 '' c • r.E a`a)) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ w ''.` O• u0 U U U U U ' m M gni tt tn m ._ :x Ti o t C C r F i o CL 2 m m m m m m f M` d w w - = O m 3 N @ c N SHill N. 11111 aa)) enn 0 oo 'c `o , `;d@ C Q a O a Cv 4 N vL cO c iq.Si aciEC ,No .� •o o .a o > °o a@i ,-$ o ¢ .S a) .:->N '- a) o_ EtN N ' N .a -c 4--", LD) ` `, nNEa t øC L E .§- @ '� .= N c J O t 0 0 "h""a .a a a) 1 0 co c -C co >. E aa.0 N L ° O m 2 C NON r `- U °)U • c • _ V C EE O = 2 t/i = a) r Q @ a) t `"': m a) C .° c = oo coo — a) — 3 OCmtp@ 2 i a) °) Om C) N -- w ,-- a CO L m m Cu , a) O -O O N a) @ ''1 N co m O)° C C E c E O u) N a) c Y (� O (NI C ; L 1 . _ Z O@ a @ O O N O r O@ w O tz�w. . ` C E . N C U t O a) N O a) a) O a) O c = �i U L N t N > m N a) E 43 i c OCI a)Cr s O O N E a m 3 O C O @ N U@ e a){. �' t9 0 3 o m . Lt _ . 3 c O ° c ? o O al -C a) O) i CD [) L ° t6 a c E • 0 0 U V C C R O to 2 N N y Cu V C O C E 0 at ...• O R > 0 C O 0 V co O 0 .c it y C 0 ❑ 2 > 3 U Co Co C C Co Co C a a o O O w .... O o CDI w ? a) L it - > o) >, C o -c C CO 0 0) !_ 3 C � o0 O ut co co 0) 0 C a o y ."" C C O O a2 . 0 re 2 d 0 O Co L C L a) c L a) Co O N O a) a1 -0 (q y Cl) 0) 0%) 0 V O N Cl) a) to O a1 0 o 0)n o 0 a1 YO V a) a) .0 a) Q C CO .0 C 2 .0 n 'O O D a Ts Li:y o C a 0` 6 a 0 Y o 5 C ..ui a �` a.� C 0 CO 0 CO r w m (O a 3 O O C a) y N 0 > N " - o != a) cn w O` O E y N y °- $ v ❑ c N (a .. E y o n Ea) 0 E -o .t O a@ 0 (n c 0 0 -0 0 ,0 .- m aa) 0 y co 0) a) 92 c 0 0 .2,— - N - 0 y Zj .) L C O N 'U 0 a) `_ (O d L a) 0 n V o a) V 0 C 0 0 a_ a) N a N >,' y w LL a) . O � L.. N U L+ L E a) y Ol a) C C C C E d) a) U y o 0 O a U Q) ❑""' V N a) L C O a) E $ co> a a3 j ° a • .' C n� � y � N L C N 03 "" 0 O c o .E n 0 0 -- 2 ° LL N O 0 0 y a) 3 o .E a) a 0 •c w o - rn,_ o 0 0 L"' (0) N C a) c y = = E (° d@ c >,yyV COVCO0ao a°) oo0 c � c � E � 4 ((0 ooQa) ° -o DV .-• a) a) 0 .N C 0 Q 0 c l0 c o la '- ca o) CO u) = y N .0 V L_ a) ._ -0 n2Em (O0aY00 ° .ca E 0ac o - u_ 0Y0 °ima) 0 . YE 0 a) V N vE c a ° 0 m 0 ca L � 3 y O CO ° C ai 0 D n V a) ° V y a) .-. c O y c 0 = +. a3 n (n C - y 0 U O) ° ° d 0 :O V '-' m 0 .5 - IA y 0 a) > E L o c O O a) YO "" a 0) ESO a) C a) = C 0 V O) 0 0 L Z V a1 V C U a 0 V .L.. a) L y f/) 0 0 o m O Z,f6 USj y 0) N = 0 y a fN N 0 o V 0 2 C a) d - o 0- E a) n- O) - 0 0 O a) c O a) s p C c - ° co ? ° o u — L 03 - 0 0 °) a Z0a@ 2 0aw o U CO O 0) C Y O a) V N a) 3 a) o N Co O N a) C O L 9 C E O y no C 0 c ° C Ti a)7. O N n c a V O In c N S2 O N > > V N a N a a C 0) ° - c N (n ° v a) O C S3 C a) o w • ft, Ea) c0E .a O)� aC > > dE > :.°-. � oc m'Ecc- w2E amomcc � Ecyw co Fa rmoc , moa) gwa) E � av") aa)) •_ s Dom > � - EcaEa) = caa) 0aa)) NOa`) 2g H -0 ito (o -oE ° LLEoit co D -° E Fv aa) `0C . 0caayaxco -0 . oa. A,B,&C- 132 U ` C O ° n. c E E • 0 o u U c c co O fn 2 N N N U) f '6 C O -_ I • w w w @ > D C O O 'O co O 0 y C O 0 0 5 > U U U w w w C C C Cu CO CO C a a a o O « a a a 10 .� m CD ._ > M M M• C) >, c o o ) m • «_ w o m 0 • )i m m m to C) • w c P `o Nom-' c c O O e.* @ >, U) a) 0) w a) V V 0) 0) @ V 0) 0)'O V O) a) N @ C — '5 lb- w O a) )0 .c _o ca .r.. w C C C C N �' ° T C C .0 O `i 0 o — O O@ O..J '~ 0 a) a) U w y N@ C V U - o@ N (O O) m a 0) U U M -o 'O 0 V ° a) o a) r -o .� a) CO O o 3 CO j to N@ 'V) 'O -O C c c >, (1)r. 0 0.) t a) >, C - @ C '''-' N c w o o 0 o)'- o) c 3 C w@ 0) =o @ m @ w ° v y > 00 d a) w ° - o it a) a > 3 d o ° 3 @ � V o) �ao � ot � Nra@i > w � a��i c -o .NEaL ` a, o � o �`oW . CU .c .� a>oi 0 o co ga a c `o o C o-w ai'OO ¢ U 1 N O a) .a w U ° ' a) a@ w N C '- C C @ a) C (n C a) ? r.. ra ° a� 0000c @ � » � cC ° tiNOV � o a>> r @o �c ° �� o 'o � o)n od3a.o _ rn - c a 4 .4 @ °) rn4% w w 'o @E @@ M0 = - 0a= @Er " coc -w' @o0 miooE0) c '= wo °1ma) ° ° E � `on Dorrwa-° Q O1 a " ao � cc °)c E '6 ._o a) - = cc � 'Sd m II) o . u) 03. " 0 = � = r ° @ = ? a) X .0 c W . � .- CD aa.w � a C > � w -o woma ° EaC0_ a) a) w - w E a ` Z - N t cc c a c .- c° o o c a@ cccp --m c)N a - c co y a) N r+ >o° a) C o Z w > j0o >= t7a mono° - TE a-. •— co -en 2Oc _ Qmoa C - 0 c ` a) c o r a) E d @ n n r a -° = r w m D.-C a) 0 > -O CO -C2 a) .N 2 -0 Q w a) 7 0 r„ O) Z U 0. O j C w Y V 2 N N E co @ O cr,yci E � LLcca@o � � E - @o .0o) -o 3 °ow@ @U - 0wmO@a ThC co Q d @c o ° u = @ON = 0_ 2 ° r `@o ' a> 0- EO ' a) mm °-._ am 2NOUW -0c = ac) c :Eo � oo w � E arc « w if) a- wow � E • o m C ate) .2 -O v) 2oa 2` Daia) a) .r°. � `� W2 ° 0wo2 .0 .t o)'° Cu Z`U a� � =o �u °) a) F. 02 °) c � vEo :° Ec>'mooc_) cc2 a-oEo) � > � wa-) � a) Err '�aa ° CU 7 E > CO N N .O ), E .@ N N v N o@ a) C a) O> 4. co a) co .w a E 0 0 a) a Q N �. c o E ° •a u c a.., w -o 2 c -o c @ c .)) m a ° H ao `@H o)H CO n0U Z CECCiOCC c ° c o) m A,B,&C- 133 0 if a sS4,y O O • C f/7 Z N N n:Ir of M co co ' m--; N to w. 'j_ _ {;:: F o t , ` Fs.l d N > 0 4:- i -,1 i a :ir 7 U ,.v9 CD '' 0 k i'l 0 0 0 0 i (0 N Y � 0 0 0 0 c a n m m , 0. a a a w o a a 92 E 92 2 o « o o St' eti rn0 3 3 3 3 3 3 O :. m N 4),Y,;,: N m N N • `m m d r+ d m d m it > CC CC I411 • c �. CD .i w E m O • a LL m m U o o o (.0 'R=-•n 5 e,* O vs ,is c c .w c-n 3 m 0 0 m U) 0 0 0 0 0 3 Et• P° a a a a a a iewr; • m E -o ; ,i':.1 m = cod -O C N 2 3 m m o c 0 m e c = L O 4,i (6 3 .0 L.+ .0. O — '� C N c .o ~ m U U c c E w -o r_' 1 00 mmL a• m vQ � m 0 .E � F tti `s N a 2 m o =_ 0) .w m e °' C7 : = O m .� -o 'E m3 :o l: vom2v3 Nam taN 5 UwrnN � am m W .,;,:;. d C a m a/ 0 D o L U . O O - p) o m a) m r'; > > O c m a in o 3 i a _ a -C C .aq 00002c cEm m CO °-� � '-c-o-o ,;�3. N � wo o Na- 3oc � 1- voim E' N C 4&.: N m O N .N .E C '-' N ° C O ' m L a N m m K` ` w " `1 N am U m C 'a) m U tp 22 0)!_ 0) a N al " f O C E m o U `O E U w m aoi = �O`m .N c aoi L N a) N '= c s"3` k; 'm o o a� � o n _°' a� o 'w m a d o n ,-- � � m to aC0 ..' o2 E .cc ..., ao � � -c 00 o- mNN N L a *=F,;` m c O .E c O O 0) c o.. a. � :! �.+ mrno mom moo ° rnw . � ° m mm cm CO t' ell. L- �_ c 1-' c L m Cl 3 5 � d Z > o 'O • am ° ° O m > > c2c co . °c'm ooaoEo °' ID N .- ° 'y'. .V N 2 N N U E E Q. > N "O O 00_ U L Ol N N p O N• a m .N ! . a2„ ° ° -0Y ° � E � ou dcccmi av EuamccoOm m N N C i..7. •w "" N CO '8 O o 0 a) 'pl m c .n m w mrn mmai m o t � F E ° Eco o m ¢ O � � n � c n C .0 N c 3 : ,(o N m o (1) 0203 -0 m E 0 O Joint o C .c C C Gil?. ;itur w o w 6 a O N 7 2 _ • og oo F- " NOL N mE ` L m w c ° L o eo > m 3 Iy Nam w .� `m U am F. a dCO1 'r ? _ F- or F- c � `U aa) NNaN A,B,&C- 134 • 0 0 O 16 " c co • o @• O V co Z co v 0- c cn co to a -o 'c 0 F a) It CD @ C o a m O 0 w - 'C 5 > a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a a a a a c 2 2 v 2 2 2 ,� o o '- `0 0 0 0 0 0 co c o 0 aa) ) a) a3)a3) a) E ,T, a> a> a> a a aa)) P > a cc m cc cc cc C) > • C O 'C c (0 O ca r — c • o a) 2 )i O m m 0 0 0 C) o c a ` C c c o O a5 0 co M• ,° 0- 0 0 m a a. O v .5 L .>, C @ 0 O a) C a) a) 'O a) "O U! a) O O O @ >, C O C O .L' ■p f� "O O L L C . E N tea)-„ m O ,_ C 'C L C• a@ - 3 c •E c u) o) � :... � @ @ •3 " `m :_ co •> 0 a.) b 0 0 com � o � @aomooEEav cu) ` - cw — o � 0 CL u) EEicv � a 0o)OEmma) L @ '2- moNU Co 00mLO, � � m > � c a>i 3 nc a.�—°O .iaL 3w .� cd o m � c) 0 -8 E a) 0 ° 0 oil U ac @ 0EmE ai -oc0`_� mo).° .o � .E 'o a @No � E ° m - -P -om C a) V O O .0 C C - O . O E 0 8 c 'p V! a) C - N a) a)i• ° o me , � am� rn `@EE -o > .ct E -OE 1)) @ a-0o n o 0 0 v m c rn m c o 'a (;,"'''7' @ o 31" 0 @ E r o co 0 > 2t oa CDs `o1_ oo gm � r 3a a c � oE ° oa00•c a) .SOa° E u) � mao wom � 0 ° cc ° cmZ• 0 (0Q � a Z = = dooNO a) Q, o 0 ° - .mU 7:3 -.5 .0o pO - N oc ,c, _c '- CO Cc M O UL m C C @ N@ c w 'C @ C E C C 3 ` @ @ > L... 0 O v @ _ m a 3 � C Ctc rnO S .a? N ac m a) in co Z a -O = cm � x;.50 ? EFL a16) rn 2c) EEco) 0ca) N0EaLEN a ° 0 .c y -ocOo ac) .omN u) @t 0 O -° .o a ° rn.. 5 _ @ 2v � = -OO rn o m = cut) E @ Eo ai � d @v 0 -c o -oo a) 2 0 cot @ o • C = a) a) o � mc .c � °) 3o °' EaOiN�' mE can vfOL � rno `i - •-•`• " E ° c 0 c V a cd v)L L a@ a U o .0 `1 ._ °) o) _.- c .� o a3) 0 C 2- V@ .0 0 co a ca N O O a) ._ O U ,;(7., O 2 U 0 0_ O a O C 0 �._ ] -c w ° @ o c O C 0 = = o = Ca Ca 0_ -0 a00C@ c - a) 00 - ( w ° p3 Qa) E -° CD000 = o) o av @U U) UO2 • = � � oat w E o,22 o — — • • A,B,&C- 135 o U rt . C E ,,v. O O � < AS ON p a xar; co o u i V„'s' v N Z `Fr.r6 T. V' V C' V Se€ev N N V to .r * 3 F ' 4 L ad. 'f E'& �f; N O1 £gam'f, G O 'gtx !; 'a 9Mp nO f t W :wn i ,t N o ' 8? ii > Q Q Q Q , s} Q Q Q ii f, : T -a m C - C C C CS C C C 0 0 o 0 0 0a o c o 0 �p ,,„.. � U U U U 'rat, U O U U .r Rc. a) N Q!N OC1 N O)N q £,. a)N N N 0)1- _�I- E d . a O O O a 0 O o re C o C m C C 3 C P. > .e Co Co Co Co , U U O S Co Co 444 £' n' jqq C U . 8 '` C 'aa, k CO O C situ > - O• i w. 5 aii ' U 0 0 0 v 0 U W. p) kik j N f { k N rv") folt n°• ° off; a- 4 m ce 0 m m m 0 m O 0 fflet kaY„e, ' "a a) " @ °= "- '0 0) 'O C O i C 0) N C L a) 0 a) LO "'fa 3a a) L _ O a) C a t�, 0002 o0- E 3N pcw P -7.1 av cn °) UL a - m C M 7 O °) C ..E C .v) ° e O f/) _a co ` E '3 L Y k0 .88 ...s -2 a L N O O c E 414 co E .� L a) y C w a) L O , d C O y C 3 d 5 ° _ 0 cC 3 ° Q0 `o sy Cornoy o0 a) o M 2' Uc3 o , p O 0 � 4 `oP o cEo E m 2 u) 2 ° oa0 gge�, f a U aw c -0 u o j"�sy, a) .NCym � mp �� o i„,,,,,,l ` L L N N O 3 a' N m a.N .O 0 L .- ` N 'O N C V) C E O O >. uC a 0- to U .p W E Q) a) .- 0) ♦ - E N 3 0 - 0 d C O N 3 a E N N U o p Va) C '00 O •c Cn S C a) E L a L .N ti) O N a0 a -p o o c n > 0 0 E ° o`. o o kg y a ` '3 d 0 E ca > a a.L_ p M'. tO a ° y a3 Z' � � m mod .TOOV m >, O 3 E c C C c Z ,) c0) � m Nn as 2La5 v2 waON �*.�'�("3: as 0c0 co � omo 0 O 0 .- a) C 'o ) a) 92 0 N >. N E W .N N.0 p et,. O .CU c y N N CO 0 E - C E a) 7 U 'o-.= L m N a E. (% 9 O p C 2 a 0 C .N ,2, O E IX 22 O O C O c 'O m Q n0 — ° ° U 0 � 0 0)U O N C co - R E ,i CU m � .L y 9 W o EE cc?, C ar o . m >.O cn . m N c ` m IT E E `r m}... E -C p ._ c a ° 0 C O E v) c _ La) -O a co a) -a) - mda) ..0 E > ma) cna) c a, a ... cncca0c a ° - c a) a) a) '0 ° o ray) o a) rnm ` aa) c O at .».,.• ti a) N v ca a °) w F p o m a v, m i m s a) w Q a) >. m c t 0 '° 2 = • w E , N omU c o)_ .o o mN .) m m L a tn. o CD m e -. p a a m 0 v fa d K.:ps. O an «0 V u! O c .ca U a) ±,c a._ v) N U O E >.-0 w N E CO °' $.rapt: O N 0 L_. .N C N (/) . O E E >d> a) 0 cpOa p ^ 0 = Cr _a C N C O a E -,a) L p N E 0 E (>), E a 0 L > N 2 . d a) 2 j U "a N .0 a N N C 2 a C_ “9, t- mCC3 u_ wa) o Orn UCCc`o {� H 3500 I- aaiac) a= E HE A,B,&C- 136 ° . U o !° a c E • 0U v C m o Q Q .. . O) Z Z v Z N 0 A w 'C C a) C ° C w . O CO > O • C O w a CO O 0 L .0 O 'C '2 > Q Q Q U N C fa C C C C w o_ O o O a a) C DI co C 0)Y y C 20 o 3 C U w C C y O O U) j a E ° , O o o no 0 O c N F > ❑ o ❑ o ❑ o cc co C C) >, C o 'L c CO O ° r r = W • O c ❑ • LL V U U m a) C) o c so • c C C c 2 m m w w d m CO d • C O L 0 '0 O C U) 'O yj ° O uj O , V CO '0 O U O .D O '- N 1] a a O C a) -0 a) 3 r o 'c o a) — m •-0 m m to o a ° ° N 3 2 o U m - 0) N o N L f0/) 0) U) m 0 -O O -0 a c ° mt 0. m —` a) 3 m co O o m °Li) E ° c ° co L E >,`o w O CO e CO a) E m w c O c � � 0 ° m co 't - c ° L 3 0 m O tj L N to 0 0 L O O 2 r ° C ° y 30 � . c -0 ~ m mom _ -S v) -o o .0 3 � � m .o = ° 2 a '5 o m - .0 L F m O N N � O O L 'p O ..o L N 0 N O C v CO 0 U 'N Q E U 'C m ° N 0) 0 a C T 0) E o 0 s o C0 0'nw °' E4 ° o _0 o -o m � aci � '- a a N - .O ° 'C C 2 - m T O E ° . N ` p O -o a.) 15 a) o . "CD a) -Fn ac cEow 00 > ° E o ° 0 ° � O ° 'm _ o Z v � .Jc � (,jo coo m3 �O- � c moNm �� � ° t y C w o ° m avi o ° m N ° a ° ° E • o O C o m � O t Y m C .- 3 ° "O N o L N - O N 133 a E N ,---n- .B •C . O .6 O 7 p O O 0 � �' W a) `= O L W C _ C y Q 0- 41 ° 6 V t m C w vi t ,, C t E N 2 . E cur E 0 m E L ' c0 3m c .. .EEQ) ° ° O 'E0 Cr) E > E QEcor o rn a) ( m m cm - ° m oE > • � c Oct o °c- c Zaa - r >, 0m otc Em rs � mo � LmoEc o m >_ m 0 3 o ° c F- m 3 J m . c a r L . t- E a m F.., E m O 2 L L C C m oc E C) co C O N O ° O ° ' ° ✓ 6 O 0 co C m -0 V ° C O Od , 2 E Q - °? U a CL m Fo- U° in .E A,B,&C- 137 at a I- C O 16 a .) E • O 0 0V c O v O ) Z N N N N a 'c O c F O O 0 > O C O 0 •o m O 0 C E w `- 0 2 > U 0 0 C C a a) C O a O � o O `o `0 .0 o Ca w 07 0 0 a3) o a0) � o .� a) cm F > CC a) c 0) >, c u -c c CO 0 0) W 4 • r O c 0 * it co m 0) O C ao N =' C C O O 0 2 m m O .- 0 6 0) C 0 O O L > - N a) C 0 m1] Y to .15. 0 .in N L O O .L.. � L_• o N N 3 c ,•z O N 0 L N 0 0 DO)0 3 O V O N ' -0-O O o 1 0 y w ry CL a) '5 C C O E O N lLa N C L @ '�O O N N a2000_ a) 3 a) 0 N L '> a' U L 0) E C 0 a m L - 0 (6 0 O - Ol:0 C N N 3 D O O O a) N 0 N a a . O - O O co O c) .L.. o O 3 3 0 to C .0 C 0 O V 0) N 'O >, • N N O N C O U O a O O T. W O O .- 0 L a) O O) C •CD U 0 - L a) - la O . O ...... m � � .o o .§ w o o 0 E O c m 3 w a ry O W n N (a O- N N O 0 0 L N > C) a N Z Ocp >, O 0 a N a) O .0 C to .0 0) • C C ._ mL.. O b C .O CO U N (a V 0 0 'O o O O a) (a N U -O0 a `0 I- 0 — 5w d :0 E Cu .3 v; m ° m U ' a.° Ein to L a) 0) N m C fa O N O -= .N, Oj to N N N a C m e C ' O t N 22 c O oo_ a C O N o U '6,1 -0 a) a w 0 .a2 C O m :o o _ L c • o c O L � - 00 aci C- ya < o) 0_ W v .0 W m o E 'o L,2 . >- O rnO 0 ° - c 0 L a) a) ) t a) L O - 2 - H UJc; o U F A,B,&C- 138 m 0 o !a N d c E • O O � U c c m O CO Z N N N Ti a 'c a) c m a) m > O • c "o .2 TS CO O 0 .0 w m r. U o a > a U N N C C m m c am a r.. O C O t O 'y O O CO CO c) 3 c i) C • o O a o a o o_ 5 it > CL m W C) T C o CO •C C O o r • C O W w. O N O 0 * lL m U { e- C) a) c a `O N C C O O ya _m m " O 0 a2 d m C C C C O O C U a) y L Y C C V 'O 0)..: T"O CO m a) m o m CU m o 3 m .co m o c c c w.o m cT m N N O N c .c a) 0 m 2 c --O '0 c 0 To c .0 Q) C0 0 c a : cm -I CO, � c cu a CL S m ` :O O a) Wu) U a' o C a a) ?i U i; > C .m O C 'C c Y a) 76 C9 N a) m r t y o O) N U C m OV ° �p a .N_ 7, Q 'm 'E.G.) t = N �) U O -, m a) c Na) m m - O_ N NO aN om : co NU) a) � cc 0EC = a) mu en 6 m0 co ° m •( rCc =a=) a) O O J 6 cu 'O E 'V) � L — O N N m ' m sp N E Y O f "O m Si C O O N ;. @ — o j.L.. U To- 'N U CCI U °. C — c U U H U a) .0 u) o m j m "O > L E N N .c E O — O a) w — m . .0 N ,a) o - ,C N f0 N > a c •o v ° m 3 C N a) U — L L NQ — O 0- a) — O ai � O O Z a) o N C ~ L.o. m N N .mC U °- o = C.N O 'CO :; N 0) c aa)i O ? U V m m c U m u N C .c _ U) N a) U N N '5 N m C 0 0 C > N N O — ° m W 'O N o �O CO ._... aa)) N .o 'p C CO y y CO c N < o cc N U O .O U N O o °` a L a U m E U vi m Eo r� cEca ma `o °- o char o f O) o ° N U U a) N O a) a .) c o N °- a) C m c ° f6 • � c 2EU Lya` oco � s _ > t � to = ca) gm0co3� O 0 ° o m H .0_ a U a `O H ._0>" Q H o F- o H c°) 'w .-` E 'to -o E 'oE 4.-_. -0 mgr_ C) N • • • • • N _O N O t' U :+ 6 L o c m U C 5 E H ° 3 U m2 Et > A,B,&C- 139 CD U ` C w O c E • 0 0 U C = CO o N Z N N N 10 w .0 C CU r.. E. • I- - a 01 w C O C 0 0 CO O .- L .0 0 `O a a > U U N a) C C al a) C n a O 0 0 7- 0 0 131 u 3 0 0 E I= > m 01 >, Co ` (0 O 0) r 3 a- C cr 0 • O 0 N 2u_ m m • 0) • 0) C O C C• C O O y5 m a '- O a re w m d - 0 >. D O O > C 0 m m '0 m 0 N a) O @ ° a) "O o �O .L.. a) L. a) C C o U o o f co o 0 N m m co r.) c E CO E O)� n co 0 -O p ,o).. L — (6 c o '� C N 3 3 w u c c d CO 0- C 0) as c o .- 3 m 2 > 3 0 E O N O 'IV C 0 0 g V U) 0) C 1] aa) 'O -0 m _ U L = _ L .0 a) a) N a) (0 a) a Co c C CO •0 c w `0 o ° .a C ° w ate- U o 0 - a) 0 0 S] L. y0 C U 'O N CO O Y CD o U U V7 U O a3 a) d "O L O f0c L co as 0) ° -- c acE a) a) c E ® U m m._ Oct c � ° • m N o • o a, .> m a V aa)) o f m o a) v a 0) a-2 a) 3 m C o 0 C m-a - .0 1- 0 0 m p U � — a) L i CU = o L m °) '> U m m 0 0 � ° ) Z a s a' f0 a) c a) a t 0 o o) co > a0i U -o o `c-o 0 ct - vi aa)) c aa)i C O W U a7 C 'O C U c �n ' L -0 al 0) L O > Ea a) O ° D C Y d N N C .a O v p_ a) 0 C O a m :- c U ca C 0 as o 0)5 v a 0. an d a3 - o) `m o) 0 a) ° m co m a• 5 0 m 0 0 NQ CCo m L- I- ui0 m °C) 0ui = ac) ion n.2 3 wpm 5 a 3 `- o yrn `O >w 0) - o3 � 0 - — E o _ E U - ca) 3 n c it, C C — a) 2 a E Loa U C O) c N �. N N N 0 U a) N N Y.a V) o N a) a) a) 3 C a) a) 00) �aa) m ° J ° 3 - -1(13 n ° a � n So 03 to ° u>iU � Dn.� 3 03 0 = D3 • E cv c 2 .Q O) m mN a • • • • • • • co n • • • • j0 0 =o n 4 O F U a m A,B,&C- 140 CD 3 L= a3 rs 42 a ra • c E • 0 co o ' ' M t▪ v v CO Z N N • N CO To F• a c ° r r• W r 0 as -s`f W.- a) C ft-V- x- :tip c w p ws 0 • =-W2C ' te ' cC V L w F 3 CL) : a a a ; w v 0 ;• V C C F < 0 C w `o_ ad = ,; a a , a a cti O ' o 'a o ply `o 1 , o `o CO w N co a -F-j 9.) 3: a) a) I- > 2 CO c 2 � d' d' • c c• W Ih . 2 u U nc, m Ct4a m m ,Y sff .: N '= fa` 0 0 U s m m m 0 �.d ° O) ca O_ ° n >.•"' O) O C V 'O ° O) O ° ° . moo) - r-a ) c ° , o h o ks--- c 0 co c a) ° c `° ., c .0 a , D E mmg -raw - - Q � Ec •C �4w,�.= 0 ° " ' � oo00o0 .o - ° o C N W ), c O n N N c C ')%' a a) .° to a y . O O o)a) 'O a) NO co N c N 3 0 o d • Q ° LL f0 k ;i m m as . uu o a o a) a o w a. to ° t,- a o m m r 0 ° 0 ° m ,i.0-a--g E o v m c ,c c a) E o c Z aX o f 0a) ,° 0 E0) `) �° '-- °: u (°ac ° cam • a 5_a_ t � '" � ° ma°io ._ fOCLi °- � a, = a, ,w o- c 't ° N .m > s , as m d ° ° E a o o ° L S a a)0 2 .c eN � ml'v' 0 - - c °) ° . oCO2oN a � a o � mE � ° co � m a ° xy,.: t -- (ca v°)i -. > ate) e . 3 CO a _C a) E o -0 d t .c =" cc o w o 04cm y -� ° „ ° °_ L- M • _ E .c a) p ° Eom ° a`a)) o (a k.(n, 3 U ° a) E c °)- c E o ca c ..t.- x0 - Tm ❑ � aa rte: a0ca) c2 La2omoC ca) >, cooai 2 x c N a „_ c :dal a0 C cc o „a mm° C o c ca cE to 4... o ) � 0 � aai m Zc c -oco 'nk5 o -°o -oo ° oo) 'C'Ui c � cma) a) a ° � ya`> a) c (o00EOmE "' a) O °O C a) a nM:: O O > C ,° C +C`wi 1'j > C tn N d C a) CO O is ` C y . ° ° ` . a) N o ask 0 > — °) o'... A.W., m a) (o c c a) = d m co N N .- 0 • ca E yQ T m2 .it# Lma) o6o_ 00i so` ° na2o .> x odc ° ° ._ Eoo_ cLto .c -O a ° m o al c ` .19-.) C ° ..-.>:, N a N a N w t c O o a) a) CO ° ° a ° '� N CO -OO O C C O O:t 0 n • c c E p °- o o au m n aa)) 5w o.2a m � aE a y so,; w -gd m ° '� .x 0 Et, E mm.c o.-2 0 $2 co .3 E ° '°O N OT gea4 a E co W a) O) y Oa O N '� O N p a7 ° -9 O) C -O O_ W ° O ° c TY ca C C O U a cwi ° .O C ° a) C O 1=64 O N fa C (a C E I-Li ° W a 15 O o) C C 2 L ` L E ° ° E a7' L a1 o L aa L N ° T' ' L ° L o ° C ° O C N (Q — C U .J O a - Ka a) 2,- I— Ea w Z. a o > 4 o OE cZ ao rn° o LQ .c 'a) ° 3 A,B,&C- 141 a) U C O m a O 0 •U (-,) r ca O c v )n v V b) Z N N N CO N N N To 'O C d C F o w Ct o n) C O 'O- 'O 1°, ., O ? -c w 'v 2 > a 0 0 Q 0 0 co co co co as c G o. a 0- a n a•— 2 O is O O O O N O O O co E o a) a)a) 0 C cn aa)) a) F > a a CC cC a) c 2 CC on > t• C CO O o r = 0 0 0 0 0 �-- 0 o Cr U U U w U U * LL m m m 6 m m r on o .c_ . C C C O O a2 to M• w m m 0 0 m 0 u) -E. O ° 2 CO2E � a°) a0E oomooc° om ma uco crop a L L O to L O w N N 'O N a v.- co _W 4 N N Co (0 C w0 A in > •O -O N N C 113 C N a L N N O L .c O. c L.. c `p-O r O a) a) >CL N a) °) f° >�° f° 3 T 2 a) E 03 ca)) � E P - a) °)m o N °)m )5) � m ?°? r .o -• o orn ° vg 0°-.a V' -O O N N O Cl- N C U d a) C U '> 'O L N o a) n m a L N > (° N O N u `O a EO 'N mE3w d � aa: ° O 22 0-CoOO -0 c o > > - > > Om (1) o2 - c 2 > Edo. 2 ° acid a25w0o8SU Em3 � ou0 .o o- 0Ea m e Y 0 . m >Oc O N Oa= v a.ci° E H ° U o E (Doc ._ Occoc a) cc0C -° Emao) Ecn co�-c0 aa)) a) �«. O ' > O "0 c a) � ' N « N 0 �. O O a) `g ,c d ' d 17) a' Z y E ? o g o N a ` aa) a > 2 a0i c c° o a o 'w _C E o 2 a o z o aEaa)) � aN `o ro@aE °c) ocgcE N � occoo a..@00 0cwfl E0E aYw EEOO ° EE - c = - E � c rno �moc -oo o o 0 5 o 00 •C c m O L ° E 2 O O ° E L .E � 'as o E c `o_ E c m.c m � .c ° � yc _amo ors Eci.cf0 .E2 -' x0 NEWcoa00- 5Oa ' " � -00-° C C O_ O O c CU ° O N a) O O C t d __ CO co E E _ C° o co E N L > o c C y° c °- > cn2 4OC° ° go -oO m2 jO c (1) ° = o > ;oa) O = o ° OcO° c mQ 1-- 0) 0 -C(048 a`) ° a3 o) w2'NoL"' cLn `nm � aCVC0c >' O ao) 5E --- o aa) 2r E O CO C O )° U a) - O O- 0 m a) 'O n c CD c ° a `o m` Imo�o m ° m ? Cu.a cO °) coEm � O � co � w' o ° oo a -u) = 0 -5 m o0f� ? w oO = aE m Ci. " 0moa m _cccOCcO3Em oac) ° v O o3J � O ° a ° u O � aw .ncQOpO c u`n' oa) 0 ° .- - coo • «, a) °) O > O °" >. > Oo >, o . CO0ECa 2 : E R o 0 E @ ccc Om Om a) co = m o - O � ° o .. wa m O rnm cas .c c 'c O a ?� ° ° c a � _2 -° c 2 .N ° 3OE3 ' 2E :0 0Cu :r 0. c om co �' > O O0 ._ o O . c E w -- °' E Evo ci c 'n -a0 you, � 0fo0 LOC 'om LO >, ` c° mo � OcOE > a`) o ? ° C .o0OCO = E OamP Oumo HLOE `o FoDo � X0 .21) EEo awOo nro ° � U A,B,&C- 142 a) 0 {t.'! u)• Q Fix N • C E w c 0 U as, v ; ICa O ‘1.. k`c:' R 0 Z N �_^;e N N N V cn .J.,t of a c .1 a) c • °' .c't as m xrn; > 0 r...{p,. y,44p; ' w C W a u %%;:- O t w a) 4, U ,M.tin U 0 > a '` U C c1i c c a PA a C _O °" O w O O o O J ° _Y4. al C - a) a) cu a) c " yN•.) .> .> C E .> c `y a) x2f: 4) W@ 0 a) J 0 E F > d' ■F? CC a' O- U a Co Co Co 74:.+Y.{; O d r�<y � • C C U ..i 0 O O ,m, U r'. U ^2LL m m m ¢] U to y C cn 0,:i.4 t !.�of • r TO C C C i c°.5 a_v 4 aim 0 � 0 0 C 0 LL' w m mkt: a a a M *^.vr -E' @ @ el.-At, co o C C a) L N c - N -O -o C C a) a) @ L a@ a/ @ N a) U N )'.j.R" A _@ E L co U O L W a) C O ° C N • T EOc > � °) c `: vi- aE -o L3maoo@ oCE 'o c @ `o co O - a) > N a) a) `"r C o a) a 7 , -° J N Z 2 a) ow 0 c a y >+ o w d m c CCI o a a a 3 c v o CL c vi p -O 0 i o) m@ c C N o U � o o U a J O W a) t, a r C a O O@ N O U � E >,to_ C J N ° c co O)Z 0 L m @ Z ,au{ 1 O � O C@ C 'p U O c a.> 0zzE > o5 ro a o c a oa) Ea n 0...-' O O U > -0 L )+ 4't CA O@ N '� O o C O a) E O@ U O U Y 3q a) � c m0 ,'Z,_: >• @co '" � ") � o � Eo to co E ° O E = N ':�' @ .� @ U N C L N@ O L "CCD > L t� J U O OM >. me w `) > . :ti 5. Eaa) -c - c ., o)'u) Uo I- N > = " @mC c c _ 'O .O J (%a o r a) O O 5 E O J C U .. CO a) O a) v a) a) o) L @ O m -O V) @ q N O o O '2 E N 'O c>- O E N co C ra Z C O) m Co @@ a--, > R-t C C O o O 0 0@ X 3 L @ 42 E c c N c@ CA C O c 2 - �° O 4 5 O I b s,-,,. @ U C U @ o. -c W a) ... _ C J@ U o C O „ m > m E -° U " J -O � c co o - 3 ,g aa) o g u, .. . m E >: ) a) C o .0 E@ E a E ` 1 N = U ° o o m V m c O L V �? 01 o a@� cnQ co0E6m J a) ,' - ,. a) Ocrn c ° -co (2 o" m T -Z @ N C -O T@ a) J ' a) co a) C c m m w C U a) c U .Y 4 a) L .L. ) C .° O L _ N a °-=' V) E o C p m CC a ° E O � �. QOo � ,,: O � V U . Eoo0 @of o o UL w a) o o@ E ` � O CO o c x o o m � 3 c 'a `p � � N E c o � ,m N E N o m in o « 6 O 7a C N O N ai C = C O� ° c a N 'O '. a) N 'E E- ° a0) J. O L a) v' a) d 0 J � O = a o J s c - L o a) J a) ,n E .c o ° a@ 3 0 U a o -OmU `r{ a U w in E H e as_o Q E a 5 .c .cc U rE c n E A,B,&C- 143 N U C a E u w A i' 2 a a as > C O• 0 - ` LL D u •- , 0 w ,7o C C �s c m o C 03 0 C ,s`di. 'a o imp m co Z v < v c a g o v `o N ; v 0 O o a Ti yC: a a v 0 0 a, 0 a •C '-O' L L L D E Y o a) C A'wF L L L a > co 'm:` 3cnre m0 N t0 )-•CO > 0 gm. .- N m v ,n m r M.rfl O O c m O .0 :C '�'a; w Jf co co 4`3( o n'" 0. 0 CY C a C c c c a'..c.; r O O O O O « 0R c E m a) U U U o y O) 0 aE rn2 a2 .!E a E C ii. c V) c V) c to ny a) >. a iii: C c C C ! ,a U u CO A- > O0 0 ❑ of t;PS To T 0) 0 0 ri .10, h N c a L N C C `di o O 0, cD CO O 0) ccnoo C m .y,.,., 0 • 0• t0 U U U i Laii c v E o C ro oa o it ;? 0 01 >> o 2 N =' Up-. — m a Ug CO O � C m LLZ N 0m d d � t U o n .)2 w '2`C$ m o L E C. C. w F- 0 o f21 5 o 0 -C -O C Y 0 y > > N (N// >. y N 0 O@ C N C L C a O _ N Ew _ Op OU 'p N a) It: .a OWN ;to; 3 , , i i w vU NaN53m cmvc aciYOmoN 'Na 5} ¢ Do c.) ❑ w U d E 0 O c c0 �' O N N 0 N N (0 N N c 0 O k:.h: XL) aE N E 0 '6-_ 22 ' m 6- -o 2 N -0 N 6-)0 .- C rr N aa)i `O o N N 0 'O '5v — m 0 0 3 C . ' > c c o :5. r w ti .0•c E 0)0 c t c 0 N N = m L N o N m x ° o rn t. N 0 .L-. 0 C O cn c U E x u) c0 O >.O N a) C ,,z'.; N O N N N 01 U m N r N j c 0 6- co Ea) o' O a o N - � o ce) N N N a.0 O c N C c00 a = c0 > — T - C N 2 N C N c0 c N N N O c0 c >. N N O a) C 0 :At p v N c N o o a 0 o co N c E .c a) a c0 - -0 = : _ a) w W a) 0 N 2 C N O O N N a) N co > > -- c c N o 'o E 0, o - U c - a " co rno o - m m 0 v O C N N 'O N O N C U .� - .0 a) 0 0 0 0 0 :. L N :� ;, d .h a) O, c Z C O) N N O)N '� 0) c O ,,_ 2 0 s a N N O ..J N- O E = O N ` 1'""' a s m y .i y Q) 0 'O ,N O 0 .0 m V "- 0 . 0 N Y N N V N ` c O o .,0z 0 00 o a v o 564.31 m a 6- L .� (NJ c a`) c - 6- aa) a-O) _o � c d m¢ 0 n y (-) 0 a) Q al¢°^¢ 'w 6 u S 'eg to < N = O N N N E C a L 0 at a O N o n ... .)0 0 -- 0 0 C @@ '0 N i,,.y+ .0 o `o o O d o N O '0 C a C ,� p .O V .CL O)�-' O N N (O O = N C L C U ;P•i ❑ ? m 0) 0 °-' • N c -r, o o; E N _!�,, C p L ON N � a�� gn �60VI -0 (7 p EN 00)_ ENUCN s cc, 0 c Tv a, •0 a) O N (0 0 2 0 a) '5 m N a) .a) N (0 0) 0 2 N -- 0 ;;o. U '0 N CD m w 'o . -0 N N N _ o c m v -0 a 6- b c c 0 0- o ,,o -,113. U m a L « a c co N V) '0 is t c c 0 c a) a 7 ] = _ ..0'O a c c " ,,,04 ❑ , , E 0 0 N t 0 0 N L V Y c N L co 0:10T-) 16 c0 c E 0 N >. ,fli.,, ❑ ❑ w o o U U NCO F' c U .0 N N N N N F- 0 = L c L 0 a U co Y r U a U m a w A,B,&C- 144 . . fti. : w City of Rancho Cucamonga • °�k ;�; MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION „„a;3 The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 Public Review Period Closes: November 9, 2011 Project Name: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 Project Applicant: Chaffey Joint Union High School District Project Location (also see attached map): Located in the Very Low (VL) Residential District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) -APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20 Project Description: A proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots. • FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytic basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • November 9, 2011 Date of Determination Adopted By A,B,&C- 145 RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 TO SUBDIVIDE FIVE (5) VACANT PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF ABOUT 53 ACRES INTO 76 LOTS IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, ABOUT 150 FEET NORTH OF THE FOOTHILL FREEWAY (SR-210); AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15,AND 20. A. Recitals. 1. Chaffey Joint Union High School District (Chaffey JUHSD) filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of November 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on November 9, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant project site located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210); and b. The project area consists of five (5) parcels with a combined area of approximately 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 940 feet (north to south); and c. To the north of the western half of the project site, there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site,there is ongoing grading and construction of new homes (Related file: Tract 17651). To the west, are additional single-family residences'and a single vacant parcel. To the south, is a road used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this road, is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). To the east, are vacant parcels; and • d. The zoning of the propert y and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and A,B,&C- 146 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 —CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 2 • • e. The proposal is to subdivide the property into 76 lots for single-family residential development. Development/construction of the homes following the subdivision of the property will be by others, as it is not the intent of the applicant to do so themselves; and f. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas will range between 21,780 square feet to 36,890 square feet,which are in excess of the minimum of 20,000 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 25,230 square feet, which is in excess of the minimum 25,000 that is required; and g. This application is in conjunction with Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located: The proposal is to subdivide a property consisting of five (5) parcels with a combined area of approximately 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres) into 76 lots for single-family residential development. The underlying General Plan designation is Very Low Residential. • b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not • be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant;the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. c. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan except for the proposed noise attenuation walls along the perimeter of the proposed subdivision that will be in excess of 6 feet in height. The applicant has submitted a Variance request for consideration by the Planning Commission. The proposed development, otherwise, meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the • imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative A,B,&C- 147 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 3 Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department • of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, • California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of a project site-consisting of five (5) parcels with a combined area of approximately 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres) and with overall dimensions of approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 940 feet(north to south) located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) -APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. 2) Development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Very Low (VL) Residential District as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. • 4) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, all lots shall be rough graded to include building pads and interim improvements (for example, drainage) as deemed necessary by the City. A,B,&C- 148 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 —CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 4 • 5) Prior to construction, all future homes and associated improvements shall require the review and approval by the City and the issuance of ' applicable Building Permits by the Building and Safety Department. The site plotting and architecture of these homes (and accessory structures) shall require the submittal of a Development Review application for Design Review Committee and Planning Commission review and approval. 6) Although a phasing plan has been submitted,this plan is conceptual as the applicant does not propose to construct the single-family residences and specific details of the phasing plan cannot be provided. Therefore, the eventual developer of the project site shall include a comprehensive phasing plan with the submittal of any Development Review application. 7) All setback lines shall be shown on the Final Map. 8) Equestrian uses and improvements shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the properties within the Equestrian Overlay as described in Development Code Section 17.08 and the Trail Implementation Master Plan. 9) Enlarge the corner cut-offs at the intersection of the north to south and • the east to west trails at Lots 15 and 16 so that they are 20 feet by 20 feet (instead of 10 feet by 10 feet). 10) Provide missing corner cut-off at the right-angle turn of the trail, located at Lot 17. 11) Drainage concrete V ditches shall be no more than 6 inches deep and a minimum of 5 feet wide with a medium broom finish. 12) The walls located at the rear of each lot and adjacent to the equestrian trails shall be comprised of a 2-foot high solid lower portion constructed of decorative blocks and a 4-foot high open upper portion constructed of wrought iron fencing. The fence pickets shall have a maximum spacing of 2 inches. Final design and construction details including materials shall be subject to approval of the Planning Director. 13) Provide PVC trail fencing at the south side of Lot 76. 14) Increase the width of the trail entrance at Lots 17 and 76 to facilitate vehicle access. 15) Provide striping in the street and signage at all horse trail crossings. 16) Reduce the length, and eliminate interim turnarounds of the east to • west trail segments behind Lots 1 and 16. A,B,&C- 149 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122— CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 5 • 17) Provide trail signage for the Community Trail at all trail intersections per City standards. 18) The noise attenuation wall along the south perimeter of the subdivision parallel to the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) shall be constructed per Caltrans standard. 19) The wall along the west perimeter of the subdivision, parallel to East Avenue shall be constructed per the decorative design shown in Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 20) A neighborhood entry incorporating special landscape and design treatment per Figure 5-10 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan shall be • provided at the southwest corner of the project site, near the northeast corner of the East Avenue overpass and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). 21) All trail surfacing shall be of decomposed granite with 4-inch minimum base. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. The decomposed granite shall be the complete width of the trail up to the property boundary. • 22) •Provide City Standard "Unauthorized Vehicles Prohibited" signs at each street trail connection. The minimum dimension between the wood posts for a step through detail is 18 inches clear minimum • between posts and maximum 14 inches above grade. 23) A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control in accordance with City Master Trail drawings shall be submitted for City Trails Coordinator review and • approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and Grading Plans. The developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices in conjunction with street improvements. •24) All Conditions of Approval for Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 shall apply. Building and Safety (Grading) Department 1) The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 2) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard-lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows • exdeed 3fps and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. A,B,&C- 150 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 6 • 3) Prior to removing fences or walls, along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines,the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property, 4) All cross-lot drainage easements shall be concrete per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements. 5) The rough grading and precise grading plans shall include an exhibit showing the locations of all Water Quality Management Plan Best Management Practices (BMPs). 6) All equestrian trails shall be constructed with a 2 percent cross-slope draining to a concrete swale. 7) In the equestrian trails water, bars shall be spaced accordingly: Equestrian Trail Slope Water Bar Interval Spacing 4% to 5.99% 50 feet • 6% to 8.99% 40 feet 9% to 11.99% 30 feet • 12% and greater 20 feet 8) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall submit a master private sewage disposal (septic) system plan for the entire project and each lot. 9) All proposed private sewage disposal (septic)systems shall be located in the front yard of each lot to allow for future connections to public sanitary sewer system located within the public street(s). 10) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit and approval of the Water Quality Management Plan, the applicant shall provide a waste discharge identification number (WDID) on the title sheet of the Grading and Drainage Plan. 11) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit,the applicant shall record a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan." Engineering Department 1) East Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City • "Secondary Arterial" standards as required including: A,B,&C- 151 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 7 a) Curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, 5-foot sidewalk, and ADA access ramps. b) Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size, shall be of a species and spaced per the street tree table in the Standard Conditions. Install street trees per the LMD plans, rather than street improvement plans. c) No residential driveways to East Avenue. d) Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. e) Provide R26(S), "No Stopping" signs along frontage. f) Provide 9500 lumen HPSV streetlights. g) Relocate existing catch basin north of"A" Street. h) Provide gated access for City maintenance vehicles to the interior Community Trail per City Standard 1006-A, including drive approach. All concrete that crosses the trails shall be medium broom finish. 2) Install Landscape Maintenance District improvements along project frontage on East Avenue. • a) East Avenue improvements shall conform to Figures 5-28 and 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Provide a 30-inch rock wall at the back of sidewalk wherever perimeter walls jog 10 feet behind the sidewalk. The minimum sidewalk width adjacent to walls shall be 5 feet. b) Provide a concrete header to clearly delineate where public maintenance ends and private homeowner maintenance begins. c) A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval. The perimeter landscaped parkways shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. d) Dedicate Lots C and D to the City for public landscape purposes. 3) Process an application to vacate the extra, tapered right-of-way along the frontage of East Avenue at Lots 1 and 76. • 4) When perimeter walls turn the corner onto"A" Street, a landscape strip should still be provided between the wall and sidewalk on the corner side yard of Lot 76. Provide at least 5 feet if trees will be planted there. Corner side yards will be maintained by the homeowners. • • 5) The Community Trails shall also be annexed into Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. A,B,&C- 152 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 8 • a) The Community Trail on the north property line of Lots 47, 58, 59, 70, and 71 shall be installed per Standard Drawing 1004, in a separate Lot "A" dedicated to the City. Access to East Avenue shall be per East Avenue conditions above. b) The Community Trail on the north property line of Lots 22, 23, 34, 35 and 46 shall be installed per Standard Drawing 1002-A. Tract 17651 has already recorded and will either partially install the trail (12 of 20 feet) or pay a contribution in lieu of construction. This developer shall install or reconstruct the parkway community trail full width along Gypsum Place. If Tract 17651 is not completed for some reason, install a minimum 12-foot wide trail outside the north perimeter wall, with storm runoff protection, for portions without a street adjacent. c) Drainage facilities shall protect Community Trails from runoff. (Adjacent streets can serve that purpose also.) Provisions shall be made for potential excessive siltation of public storm drains from such drainage facilities. d) Install "pass-through" barriers (Standard Drawing 1007-B) at intersections between local and Community Trails. Install "Vehicle Gate with pass-through" barriers (Standard Drawing 1006-A) at intersections between streets and Community Trails. • If directed by the Planning Director, provide "Vehicle Gate with pass-through" barriers (Standard Drawing 1006-B or -C) at intersections between streets and local trails. e) Parkway Community Trails can be shown on street improvement plans. Include a trail plan for the interior Community Trail with the East Avenue LMD plans. 6) Revise Drawing 2219, prepared for Tract 17651, to include full width parkway Community Trail on the south side of Gypsum Drive. 7) All internal streets are to be improved in accordance with City "Local Street" standards including: a) Local Streets per the Etiwanda Specific Plan shall have a 60-foot right-of-way with sidewalks on both sides. b) Local Rural Streets per the Etiwanda Specific Plan allow for a 55-foot right-of-way with a sidewalk on one side only. Local Rural Streets are appropriate for cul-de-sacs. The sidewalk shall end at a drive approach. c) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, street • pavement, curbside drain outlets, and ADA access ramps. d) Provide cross gutters across Street "A" at Street "B" and across • Street "F" at Street "G," only. All remaining intersections, including those at East Avenue and at Gypsum Drive, shall have adjacent catch basins intercepting gutter runoff. A,B,&C- 153 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 9 e) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV street lights. f) Provide traffic striping and signage including "All-Way Stop"signs at the intersections of"A" Street with "D" Street and "F" Street. g) Provide street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size, of a species and spaced per the street tree table in the Standard Conditions. 8) It is City Council policy that no tract shall have lots more than 600 feet from two means of access. Therefore, the streets of Tentative Tract 17651 connecting to Banyan Street must be completed before Building Permits can be issued for the bulk of your lots. Streets can be constructed by the Tract 17651 developer or by you. a) Tract Map 17651 has recorded, therefore, the right-of-way is available for the Banyan-connecting streets. b) You may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost for ultimate permanent off-site improvements from future development. If you fail to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights to reimbursement shall terminate. • Only ultimate permanent street improvements are eligible for developer-to-developer reimbursement. 9) Temporary fencing at the ends of streets stubbed for future extension shall extend beyond the street right-of-way, to perimeter wall corners on side yards or building setback lines on front yards. 10) Master Plan Storm Drains for Area 5 of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy are already in place. No reimbursement is applicable to this Master Plan Storm Drain. The developer is responsible for reimbursing his fair share of the costs for Tract 17651 constructing local storm drains to the Victoria Basin Master Plan Storm Drain System. 11) The cost of additional local storm drains connecting to the Victoria Basin Master Plan Storm Drain System shall be borne by development with no fee credit or developer-to-developer reimbursement. a) Only closed system storm drains shall be constructed—once in a pipe, flows shall remain in pipes until discharging to concrete channels. b) All sump catch basins and laterals shall be designed to handle two times Q100. c) All storm drains in Street "A" shall be designed for Q100. • d) Extend the local storm drain system as far on-site as needed to contain Q25 within tops of curbs, Q100 within rights-of-way, and provide a 10-foot dry lane in Q10. A,B,&C- 154 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 10 • e) Dedicate a 25-foot wide public storm drain easement on the final Tract Map when the diameter of the pipe is 60 inches or greater, otherwise the easement shall be 12 feet wide. 12) All interior street runoff is to be collected by the local storm drain system. 13) Vehicular access to private local trails shall be from Local Streets only. a) Where private local trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be used. Where a downstream end of a trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0.5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surface debris onto the sidewalk/street. Provide curbside drain outlets for adjacent drainage devices. b) Where private cross-lot drainage facilities discharge to the public streets, inlets to curbside drain outlets, or public storm drains shall be designed to function (not become blocked) in the absence of regular maintenance. Show the private inlets on the public improvement plans for reference. 14) Driveway on Lot 1 shall be located as far as possible from the • East Avenue intersection curb return. The corner side yard walls and slopes shall not encroach on the intersection line-of-sight. 15) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage as follows. a) Overhead utilities on the project side of East Avenue, extending to the first poles off-site (north and south), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing East Avenue shall be undergrounded at the same time. b) Overhead utilities on the project side of Foothill Freeway (SR-210), along FCD access road to San Sevaine basin outlet, extending to the first poles off-site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. c) The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (or redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the • developer to reimbursement shall terminate. A,B,&C- 155 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 11 d) Provide a separate 8 1/2-inch by 11-inch drawing of the existing utility poles per Section B of the "Existing Overhead Utility Requirements" Engineering Department handout along with the reimbursement agreement application. 16) The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage • (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). Rough grading plan showing all slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be approved prior to final map approval. 17) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to Building Permit issuance. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall • ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through • seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. A,B,&C- 156 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 12 • • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB])daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter(PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. • • 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM1a emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 12) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. • 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood A,B,&C- 157 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 13 Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM25 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) The applicant shall purchase at a 1:1 ratio 2.9 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub RAFSS habitat designated for conservation or pay in-lieu fees. Evidence of applicable mitigation agreements approved by CDFG shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of grading permits. 2) The applicant shall conduct focused surveys to determine the presence/absence of the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) following protocols established by the United States Fish and Wild Life • Services (USFWS) prior to grading or other ground disturbance of the site. In the event that SBKR is detected or observed within the area of disturbance, avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures shall be developed and implemented through consultation with the USFWS under Section 10 of the FESA(or Section 7 as appropriate). Mitigation measures shall include the purchase/conservation of off-site suitable • habitat that is known to support SBKR at a minimum 1:1 ratio depending on the quality of habitat removed compared to the quality of habitat provided. Specific ratios will be determined in consultation with USFWS. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide copies of applicable species mitigation agreements or permits to the City. 3) The applicant shall conduct focused surveys to determine the presence/absence of the California Gnatcatcher (CAGN) following protocols established by the USFWS prior to grading or other ground disturbance of the site. In the event that CAGN is detected or observed within the area of disturbance, avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures shall be developed and implemented through consultation with the USFWS under Section 10 of the FESA (or Section 7 as appropriate). Mitigation measures shall include the timing of construction activities outside of the breeding season (February 15 to August 31) and/or purchase/conservation of off-site suitable habitat that is known to support CAGN at a minimum 1:1 ratio depending on the quality of habitat removed compared to the quality of habitat provided. Specific ratios will be determined in consultation with USFWS. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide copies of applicable species mitigation agreements or permits to the City. • 4) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction • related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, A,B,&C- 158 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 14 • they should be avoided by an appropriate buffer, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary"no construction"area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. • 5) The applicant shall prepare a mitigation plan containing provisions requiring the transplantation and/or seeding of Plummer's mariposa lily plants to an off-site protected area suitable for supporting Plummer's . mariposa lily, The number of transplants/seeding shall be equal or greater than the 175 plants existing on the property. This mitigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City prior to the issuance of grading permits and shall be done in coordination with the CDFG. 6) Necessary permits from the relevant regulatory agencies (CDFG, RWQCB) must be obtained for impacts to jurisdictional features and/or waters. Required permits will likely include Section 1602 Streambed • Alteration Agreement and processing a Report of Waste Discharge Requirements. Grading in non-jurisdictional areas of the site may be allowed prior to obtaining the permits, provided that such grading will not impact jurisdictional waters. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall provide evidence of applicable permits to the City. 7) Trees that are removed shall be replaced on a one-to-one basis with a matching species of a minimum 15-gallon size. 8) Tree planting shall follow the requirements established in the Etiwanda Specific Plan regarding windrow replacement. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. A,B,&C- 159 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 15 • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation • monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM10 emissions, • in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. A,B,&C- 160 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 16 • 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM1p emissions from the site during such • episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Greenhouse Gases 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contactor shall select construction equipment based • on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) To conserve water and to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan, the following measures shall be implemented: • The installation of recycled water irrigation systems, i.e. dual distribution systems, is required to allow for future use of recycled water. • Low flow appliances, i.e. toilets, dishwashers, showerheads, • washing machines, etc. shall be installed if provided by the builder. A,B,&C- 161 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 17 • A minimum of 50 percent of the landscape palette shall contain drought-resistant species. • Turf (grass) shall not be used as a landscape feature in the common/public/shared areas; however, turf is allowed in the activity areas(s) in community parks (if any). • The quantity of grass/turf shall be limited to a maximum of • 30 percent of the landscaped portion in the front yards. There shall be no minimum amount of grass/turf imposed anywhere on the site. 8) The project shall incorporate enough points to be certified in Build-it-Green (builditgreen.org) or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). However, the project does not need to be officially 'certified' to reduce cost associated with the certification. 9) The project shall incorporate the following measures to reduce energy use: • Plant shade trees within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet of the west sides of properties. • • All units shall be constructed to be able to easily convert to solar power, i.e. solar ready. • Photovoltaic cells (solar panels), tankless water heaters, and solar powered water heaters shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option, or installed. • Each appliance, i.e. washers, dryers refrigerators, stoves, etc. provided by the builder must be Energy Star qualified if an Energy Star designation is applicable for that appliance. 10) The following measures shall be included in the site plan to reduce motor vehicle emissions and to be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan: • There is a Class II Bike Lane on East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan Bicycle Plan. The project shall contribute 100 percent of the funds the City required to construct a Class II Bike Lane on the eastern portion of East Avenue adjacent to the project or the project applicant shall construct it. • The project shall include appropriate and safe bicycle • connections from the Bike Lane on East Avenue to the project site. A,B,&C- 162 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 18 • • There shall be pedestrian sidewalks on both sides of the streets in the project site. • The project shall install a pedestrian sidewalk on the eastern portion of East Avenue adjacent to the project site. • The project shall contain pedestrian connections to the uses adjacent to the project site. 11) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 12) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating • and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 13) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient • fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets, and waterless urinals/water heaters. A,B,&C- 163 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 19 • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 14) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hazards and Waste Materials 1) The project shall comply with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code(CBC),which includes building standards for the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. The standards call for the use of ignition-resistant materials and design to inhibit the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire and help reduce losses resulting from repeated cycles of interface fire disasters. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during • construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. a) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. b) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. c) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water • Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared on October 20, 2008, by the applicant's representative to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. A,B,&C- 164 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 20 • 3) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by the applicant's representative on October 20, 2008, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 4) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 5) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. • 6) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under • the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans, a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during . construction. 2) The applicant shall construct an 8-foot — 22-foot high noise barrier block wall along the south, east, and west perimeters of the project site for noise attenuation purposes. The height and location of these walls shall be constructed per Exhibit 7 of the Preliminary Noise Assessment. These walls shall be fully constructed simultaneously with the development of the site and prior to occupancy of any of the homes. • 3) When an application for the development of homes on the project site is submitted, the applicant (current or future) shall submit a noise A,B,&C- 165 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 21 assessment to determine the required mitigations measures to reduce the noise impacts to levels of less significance. 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 6) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. • 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any • time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips(counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman • ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary A,B,&C- 166 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 —CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 22 • I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of November 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • A,B,&C- 167 r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT At STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTT18122 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP APPLICANT: CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET NORTH OF THE FOOTHILL LOCATION: FREEWAY (SR-210) —APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, AND -20. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 11-56, Standard /_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by.a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration -$ 2,094.00 X B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a / /_ complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. • SC-12-08 1 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc - A,B,&C- 168 Project No. SUBTT16122 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include /_/ • site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions /_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and /_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. • 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all /_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be /_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For • single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the /_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 9. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed _/_/_ control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements and the submitted fence/wall plan approved with this Tract Map. a. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5% at the downstream end of a trail for a / /_ distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official b. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at / /_ least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing. 10. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions(CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine / /_ animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 2 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc A,B,&C- 169 Project No.SUBTT18122 Completion Date 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners'association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape • maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 13. Construct decorative block walls between homes(i.e., along interior side and rear property lines). _/_/_ 14. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood /_/_ gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC within steel frames. 15. Return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. / /_ 16. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The /_/_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 17. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products. Environmental • 1. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation /_/_ measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final occupancy release.'The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the _/_/_ issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of _/_/_ the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. • 4. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of$557 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain • 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc A,B,&C- 170 Project No. SUBTT18122 Completion Date consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. • E. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/_/_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; • f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(SUBTT18122)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. /_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3, Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to /_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / /_ 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/ /_ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. 4 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc A,B,&C- 171 Project No. SUBTT18122 Completion Date G. Site Development • 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number(SUBTT18122). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes,ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant / /_ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: ' • City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/ /_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all /_/_ supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/ /_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. . H. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances / /_ • considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. . 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. _/_/_ I. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading /_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / /_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/ /_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, /_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. • 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/ /_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. • 5 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Sff Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc A,B,&C- 172 Project No.SUBTT18122 Completion Date J. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT,(GRADING) (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • SEE ATTACHED K. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, /—/- community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from / /- street centerline): 44 total feet on East Avenue / / 38 total feet on Gypsum Drive / / 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / /— • 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or /_/_ noted on the final map. • 5. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the —/—/—• final map. M. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails, paseos, landscaped —/ / areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source / / of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than 'one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists., In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 6 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc A,B,&C- 173 Project No. SUBTT16122 Completion Date 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: _/_/_ • Curb 8 A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other East Avenue X X X (e) X X Gypsum Drive X X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) for community trail only. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights,and intersection safety lights / /_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/ /_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing, street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/ /_ project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and • interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets,a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. • 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City / /_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / /_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be _/ /_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan _/ /_ check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/ /_ accordance with the City's street tree program. • 7 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc - A,B,&C- 174 Project No.SUBTTI B122 Completion Date 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed / /_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction • legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. East Avenue Magnolia NCN 8' 30' 15 Gal Fill Foreground tree grandiflora O.C. in 'D.D. Blanchard East Avenue Geijera parviflora Austrailian Willow 5' 20' 15 Gal Fill Background tree O.C. in in larger planters Provide Street Select appropriate tree from the approved street tree list for Rancho Fill Name Cucamonga. List each street as a separate line item within this legend. in Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. • 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / /_• adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be _/ /_ submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians,paseos,easements,trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: East Avenue, community trails 2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas(40%)of mortared cobble or / /_ other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. 3. Install a connection to the Cucamonga Valley Water District— Inland Empire Utilities Agency recycled water line in East Avenue for use irrigating the public landscape area being constructed. 4. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 8 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc A,B,&C- 175 • Project No. SUBTT18122 Completion Date 5. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the _/_/_ developer until accepted by the City. • 6. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective /_/_ • Beautification Master Plan: East Avenue theme wall. 0. Drainage and Flood Control 1. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone D designation _/_/_ removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain a Zone"X"designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 2. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/_/_ approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 3. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the /_/_ property from adjacent areas. 4. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/_/_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, / /_ • electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _/_/_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the /_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. / /_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / /_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. • 9 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Sff Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc A,B,&C- 176 Project No. SUBTT18122 Completion Date 2. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed _/_/_ beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the • approved tentative map. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • • • • • 10 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc A,B,&C- 177 City of Rancho Cucamonga ( Building& Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. • ����j/ Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 S T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477 2711 GRADING COMMITTEE PROJECT REPORT& RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: SUBTT18122 / DRC2006- Type: 76 lot residential subdivision 00793 Location: East side of East Avenue north of the 210 Freeway Planning Department: MICHAEL SMITH APN: 1 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, & -20 Meeting Date: December 15, 2009 revised By: Matthew Addington on May 12, 2011 jt Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx No: 1, If NO, see COMMENTS below: PRELIMINARY: GRC: December 15, 2009 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: PC Meeting: tti3=2472,471-- (U(O4J271I By: Note: Building and Safety—Grading will review nd comment on future submittals for this project. Note: See Sections B and C for revisions. • A. STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and afety- Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial confol mance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will bl provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement dbsign recommendations per said • report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. • 1:\BUILDINGIPERMITS\SUBTT181221SUBTT18122&DRC2006-00793 Grading Committee Project Report,20091215 rev 20110512.doc 1 of 6 A,B,&C- 178 City of Rancho Cucamonga � ( Building &Safety Department • 10500 Civic Center Dr. ! as Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • + T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check sub ittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings wh re improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Ranchd Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. A Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review. A separate plan/permit flpr Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 des�gn storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building a Id Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the En ineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acq ire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading pe it. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acq ire any required off-site drainage • acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream p perty owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not acc ted) & shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the prop sed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12.All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property, including lot side yards. 13. Private sewer, water and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, current adopted California Plumbing Code. 14. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100- feet beyond project boundary. 15. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved b the Building and Safety Official. 1:1BUILDINGIPERMITS1 SUBTT191221SUBTT18122 8 DRC2008.00793 Gradi g Committee Project Report,20091215 rev • 20110512.doc 2 of 6 A,B,&C- 179 . City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department '� 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 3+ T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 16. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 17. Grading Inspections: a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting s all be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor a�d the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre- grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day lin advance to request the follow ing grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1) The bottom of the over-excavation 2) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building • permit; 3) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by1 and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer ante' Soils Engineer of Record; 4) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate ngineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issua ce of a building permit. B. COMMENTS -The following items shall be corrected/completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents) including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: 1. Include a WQMP BMP exhibit with the conceptual grading and drainage plan. • 2. In all section views call out the minimum and maximum physical heights of the wall on I:IBUILDINGWERMITSISUBfT181221SUBTT18122&DRC2006.00793 Gradil g Committee Project Report, 20091215 rev 20110512.doc 3 of 6 A,B,&C- 180 • -': City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. � / ��jj Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 • ft T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 both sides of the wall. In reviewing the elevations n the plans it appears that some walls maybe over 10-feet high and as high as 21-feet. 3. An updated Water Quality Management Plan mus be submitted for review. 4. Pad elevations should be adjusted in elevation to lbw for the 2% swale requirement in the current adopted California Building Code. 5. A discussion was held regarding the connection o'the project to a public sewer in-lieu of private sewage disposal (septic) systems on each lot due to an existing sewer within 200-feet of the project site on East Avenue. Staff etermined that the existing sewer is on the high side of the project and the nearest se er connection was over 200-feet away from the east side of the project. Therefore, construction of a public sewer system is not feasible at this time. As a sewer system may be available in the future when the private - sewage disposal systems fail due to time and use a condition of approval is made in Section C to require the proposed private sewage�disposal systems to be constructed in the front yard to allow for connection to a future p blic sewer system in the street. • C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final ma approval. 2. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosiv . The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flow exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 3. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 4. All cross lot drainage easements shall be concrete per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements. 5. The rough grading and precise grading plans shall include an exhibit showing the • l:1BUILDINGIPERMITSISUBTr1B122\SUBT718122 8 DRC2006-00793 Grading Committee Project Report,20091215 rev 20110512.do: 4 of 6 A,B,&C- 181 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Building& Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 locations of all water quality management plan be-t management practices (BMP's). 6. All equestrian trails shall be constructed with a 2% cross slope draining to a concrete swale. • 7. In the equestrian trails water bars shall be spaced accordingly: Equestrian Trail Slope Witter Bar I erval Sfacing 4% to 5.99% 51-feet 6% to 8.99% 4)-feet 9% to 11.99% 3Q-feet 12% and greater 2)-feet 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall submit a master private sewage disposal (septic) system plan for the entire project and each lot. • 9. All proposed private sewage disposal (septic) systems shall be locate in the front yard of • each lot to allow for future connections to public sanitary sewer system located within the public street(s). 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the water quality management plan the applicant shall provide a waste discharge idenification number(WDID) on the title sheet of the grading and drainage plan. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall record a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan". D. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1. Maintenance of BMP's identified in the WQMP sh II be addressed in the project CC&R's. 2. The submitted Water Quality Management Plan (NQMP) dated February 5, 2007 with a revision date of October 20, 2008 (the preparer i f the document is not identified) was resubmitted for review was deemed substantially complete. Please note the document had the same dates. A spot check of some of the key issues in the document determined that the document did not appear to be revised. The comments below are • the same comments from the previous submittal. The following items need to be completed: �y�}�y -"-._sue+ y }n v r:. Y' arlr .'Rm ¢Y��'te,.`�1°'�eatfttigbV- P,iyu�y{��tYtiPi a°✓ � a �`tAg _�'.{�eClr�rr t� �a.9ex 3�5E_., 1�.`fi.-a:�Y.n"Aw{F ._......t�LN 'LWlv�:v.�`33 w.: .-m �ra`.lF_^ Cover Page If the document was prepared by an engineer, then the document I1 BUILDING\PERMITSLSUBTT181224SUBTT18122 8.DRC2006-00793 Gradi g Committee Project Report,20091215 rev 20110512.doc 5of6 A,B,&C- 182 .-- City of Rancho Cucamonga se e Building& ty t 10500 Civie Safe Center D Dr.epartmen Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ! •� T: (909)477.2710 F: (909)477-2711 41 ':;s`i�"aill 4MMM n -x1 1,.:;; 1,1' ;(gyp`. itt ±ONVI n Iterf0 by xi r ' E -pax must be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. The City of Rancho Cucamonga considers this the final document. Section 1.1 A-5 Provide contact name or[losition Section 1.2 A-5 Provide permit numbers [ ist DRC#, PMT#and WDID#] prior to the issuance of a grading per it. Section 2.1 A-6 In the Pollutant of Concern Summary Table" provide the name of the receiving water body. 1 Section 2.2 A-8 Change 1.B to a "no" chedkbox. Section 2.2 A-8 If 1.B is a yes provide the hydrologic analysis. Section 3.2 A-17 Provide copy of educational materials that will be provided to Property Owners. Section 3.4.1 A-22 Provide BMP design cal lations per the revised June 9, 2005 template. This is the final QMP . Section 3.4.1 A-23 Provide calculations and details concerning the Vegetated Swales. Section 4.1 A-23 Include a maintenance sciedule for the proposed BMP's. Section 5 A-23 Provide the contact inforrf ation for the entity which will maintain the project BMP's prior to the Homeowner's Association assuming responsibility. Section 6 A-24 Notarize and record the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan°. Copies are available at the Building and Safety front counter. • Remove the certification provided in the WQMP submitted for review. I Plan Review Locate the proposed BMA's on the conceptual grading and drainage plan. Attachment A-1 Remove this attachment. iThe City of Rancho Cucamonga does not use this attachment. Exhibit B Show the site location on the map/ illustration. 3. The Water Quality Management Plan should be completed, approved and recorded prior to Planning Commission approval, and shall be completed, approved and recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. I:16UILDING\PERMITSISUBTT181221SUBTT18122&DRC2006-00793 Grading Committee Project Report,20091215 rev • 20110512.doc 6 of 6 A,B,&C- 183 Mo Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection k ' District " 4 FIRE Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS July 23, 2009 Chaffey Joint Union HS District David Jeffers Consulting, Inc. • SFR Subdivision in VHFHSZ 6375 East Ave. East Ave N/O 210 SUBTT18122 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants and the location of fire hydrants must be in • accordance to the 2007 California Fire Code and the RCFPD Ordinance FD46. FSC-2 Fire Flow • 1. The required fire flow for this project will be established in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and.approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire service plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground • supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. • A,B,&C- 184 FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems a. Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance FD46, the 2007 California Fire Code and • the approved Fire Protection Plan require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in selected lots a s listed in the report. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads; streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the approved Fire Protection Plan for specifics on the access requirements. 1. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads . shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1. The following design requirements apply: a. All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device. The devices shall be digital. Analog devices are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. b. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. c. The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate. d. A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. . e. The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset. f. Gates on perimeter walls must be solid and non-combustible except the main entrance gates per the Fire protection Plan. 2. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site • plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 3. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSC-7 Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone This project is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the 'Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside District", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as High Probability-High Consequence for Fire Risk. These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District. The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. Fire Protection Plans (FPP): The developer shall comply with all the requirements of the approved Fire protection Plan for this subdivision. The FPP was designed and approved in accordance with the County of San Bernardino's Development Code Fire Area FS-3 as amended by RCFPD Ordinance FD46, RCFPD Standard 47-1, and the 2007 CBC Chapter 7A requirements apply to the development of the site, the construction of the buildings and the landscaping. These development codes provide standards regulating: a. Fire resistive roof assemblies b. Vegetation Management c. Fire District access roadways. • d. Ignition resistant construction and protection of openings. 2 A,B,&C- 185 e. Fire sprinkler systems f. Fire protection water supply & Fire flow criteria • The approved fire protection plans (FPP) and documentation must be recorded with San Bernardino County prior to release of building permits. Proof of the recording must be provided to FCS. NOTE: The architectural drawings submitted to the building department for the construction of the homes shall reference the FPP and shall implement all the requirements of the FPP. The landscape plans when submitted to the planning department for review will be routed to FCS for plan review in compliance with approved FPP. Mobile, stationary or portable power-operated equipment in the Hazardous Fire Area shall not be used without the Fire Safety Division's written approval. Specific fire protection measures that may be required to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to: a. A stand-by water tender, equipped with a pump, fire hose and nozzle. b. Pre-wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks. c. Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day. d. For welding, cutting or grinding work, clear away all combustible material from the area around such operation for a minimum distance of 10-feet. A "hot-work" permit must be obtained from Fire Construction Services prior to cutting, welding or grinding work. e. Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one five (5) gallon backpack water pump-type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation. FSC-8 Chronological summary of VHFHSZ requirements • Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the builder shall have completed that portion of the approved fuel modification/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible materials into the project area. Approval is subject to an on-site inspection. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, All the required ignition resistant features including landscaping of the FPP shall be completed, inspected and accepted by the Fire District staff. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. .Chronoloqical Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions • PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall.comply with Fire District • Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required 3 A,B,&C- 186 prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the •site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan • checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Fire Protection Plans: Please refer to RCFPD Summary of the VHFHSZ requirements. 4. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard, All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 5. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is . responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services requirements. • PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 by Fire Construction Services. An annual Fire Code permit is required for the access control 5. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be • recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit 4 A,B,&C- 187 • parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 6. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. The address signs shall be non combustible and in accordance with RCFPD Standards. 7. Fire Protection Plans: Please refer to RCFPD Summary of the VHFHSZ requirements. • • • • 5 A,B,&C- 188 RESOLUTION NO. 11-57 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2009-00020 TO ALLOW PERIMETER WALLS IN EXCESS OF 6 FEET, THE MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT PERMITTED IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, FOR NOISE ATTENUATION PURPOSES ALONG THE PERIMETER OF A PROPOSED 76-LOT SUBDIVISION WITH A COMBINED AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 53 ACRES IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET NORTH OF THE FOOTHILL FREEWAY (SR-210); AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15,AND 20. A. Recitals. 1. Chaffey Joint Union High School District (Chaffey JUHSD) filed an application for the issuance of Variance DRC2009-00020 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of November 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, • Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on November 9, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224; and b. The application applies to a vacant project site located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210); and c. The project area consists of five(5) parcels with a combined area of approximately 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 940 feet (north to south); and d. To the north of the western half of the project site, there are single-family • residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site, there is ongoing grading and construction of new homes (Related file: Tract 17651). To the west, are additional single-family residences and a single vacant parcel. To the south, is a road used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control A,B,&C- 189 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-57 VARIANCE DRC2009-00020— CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 2 District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this road, is the Foothill Freeway • (SR-210). To the east, are vacant parcels; and e. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan; and f. The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow the construction of noise attenuating walls along the south, east, and west perimeters of the proposed subdivision that will be in excess of 6 feet in height; and g. Per Section 17.08.060(K) of the Development Code,the maximum height of walls permitted in residential districts is 6 feet; and h. The proposed walls will be approximately 6 to 15.5 feet above the pad elevations of lots adjoining the walls as seen from the interior of the subdivision. Depending on the location, some walls will be constructed over retaining walls, i.e. a combination wall. Therefore,as seen from the outside, the height of the walls will be greater. The general area where the walls will be highest is near the southeast corner of the subdivision at Lot 16 where the wall, as seen from the freeway, will be approximately 22 feet high; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations • would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed walls are for noise attenuation purposes to reduce the exterior noise levels at the lots along the perimeter of the proposed subdivision. The height of the walls is necessary to mitigate the noise impacts to a level that is less than 65 dBA CNEL(community noise equivalent level) as specified in the Development Code. If the walls were limited to 6 feet as . specified in the Code, or if the walls were absent altogether, the exterior noise levels would not comply with the Code, nor be consistent with Public Health and Safety policies relating to noise (Goal PS-13 of the General Plan). There is no practical alternative to walls that will achieve the desired noise attenuation. b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district, The project site is located approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) at the east side of East Avenue. As a result, it is exposed to noise generated by traffic that is generally not present near other residential properties in the City which are screened by existing development and/or sufficiently distant from these principal noise sources that noise impacts are negligible. c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. The purpose of the walls is to attenuate traffic noise. The exterior noise levels generated by traffic exceed the maximum limits established by the Development Code and would negatively affect a future homeowner's ability to enjoy and use the outdoor areas of his property in the absence of these walls. Furthermore, the effectiveness of noise attenuating materials used in the construction • of the homes is augmented by the presence of the noise attenuating perimeter wall. The absence of the wall would reduce the effectiveness of noise mitigation measures and expose the occupants of the homes to elevated interior noise. A,B,&C- 190 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-57 VARIANCE DRC2009-00020—CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 3 • d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. The Foothill Freeway (SR-210) corridor within the City is adjacent to numerous residential properties. Traffic noise impacts along the corridor must be mitigated to levels as described in the Development Code and consistent with the General Plan. The freeway corridor abuts various residential zoning districts including the Very Low (VL) Residential Districts. Walls of this height, or similar, are common along the freeway corridor for noise attenuation purposes where residential properties are adjacent to the freeway. e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The height of the walls as seen from East Avenue will be 6 feet and will not be adjacent to any private property. In addition to appearing to have the typical height of a perimeter wall, the wall along with associated landscaping, will be constructed per the decorative design shown in Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The height of the wall as seen from the Foothill Freeway(SR-210) will be similar to the height of other noise attenuation walls along the freeway corridor within the City. This wall will be constructed per the decorative design established by Caltrans. The properties adjacent to the wall along the east perimeter of the proposed subdivision are vacant. This wall will be constructed of decorative block per the City's design guidelines. Upon development of the properties to the east of Lots 17 through 22, any residential structures, in compliance with the minimum rear yard setback standard,will be at least 60 feet from the wall. The lot immediately east of Lot 16 will likely have a matching pad elevation when it is developed to match the proposed subdivision (for grading, street alignment, and drainage purposes). Therefore,the retaining portion • of the wall (approximately 7.5 feet in height) as seen from this lot, would be buried reducing the visible height of the wall. 4. The Planning Department staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to biological resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, and air quality, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with,the mitigation measures for the project. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and the attached Standard Conditions. Planning Department 1) Approval is for perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the maximum wall height permitted in residential districts, for noise attenuation purposes along the perimeter of a proposed 76-lot subdivision with a combined area of approximately 53 acres in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway • (SR-210) -APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. A,B,&C- 191 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-57 VARIANCE DRC2009-00020— CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 4 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections • of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) The noise attenuation wall along the south perimeter of the subdivision, parallel to the Foothill Freeway (SR-210), shall be constructed per Caltrans standard. 4) The wall along the west perimeter of the subdivision, parallel to East Avenue shall be constructed per the decorative design shown in Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 5) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. . APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2011. . PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman • ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of November 2011 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • A,B,&C- 192 RESOLUTION NO. 11-58 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2009-00224, A REQUEST TO REMOVE TREES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSAL TO SUBDIVIDE FIVE (5) VACANT PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF ABOUT 53 ACRES INTO 76 LOTS IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, ABOUT 150 FEET NORTH OF THE FOOTHILL FREEWAY(SR-210);AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, AND 20. A. Recitals. 1. Chaffey Joint Union High School District (Chaffey JUHSD) filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of November 2011 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on November 9, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224; and b. The application applies to a vacant project site located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210); and c. The project area consists of five(5) parcels with a combined area of approximately 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 940 feet (north to south); and d. To the north of the western half of the project site, there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site,there is ongoing grading and construction of new homes (related file: Tract 17651). To the west, are additional single-family residences and a • single vacant parcel. To the south, is a road used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this road, is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). To the east, are vacant parcels; and A,B,&C- 193 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-58 DRC2009-00224 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 2 e. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) • Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan; and f. The trees are not designated as historically significant; and g. The trees are not specifically noted in the Etiwanda Specific Plan per Figure 5-13; and h. The applicant has submitted an arborist report assessing the health of the individual trees. The report observes that the trees range in health between being in generally good condition to being in need of removal; and i. It is necessary to remove the trees in order to grade the property, construct single-family residences, and associated improvements such as streets and equestrian trails which will allow economic enjoyment of the property; and j. It is not necessary to remove trees to construct required improvements within a • - flood control or utility right-of-way; and k. There are a significant number of mature and newly planted trees within the surrounding residential neighborhoods;the removal does not affect the established character of the area and the property values; and • I. The trees cannot be preserved by pruning and proper maintenance or relocation rather than removal; and • m. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource of the City. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be. detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the • findings as follows: A,B,&C- 194 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-58 DRC2009-00224 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 3 • a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. • d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the removal of trees in conjunction with a proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. 2) Section 19.08.100 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires that all Heritage trees be replaced on a one-for-one basis, not less than 15-gallon size. 3) A set of replacement Eucalyptus windrows shall be planted along the • entire south perimeter (parallel to the proposed equestrian trail) and part of the east perimeter(at Lot 16) of the subdivision as shown on the • A,B,&C- 195 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-58 DRC2009-00224— CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 4 Preliminary Tree Removal Plan and Windrow Exhibit dated • September 10, 2010. 4) Preserve in-place, where feasible, existing trees that will not interfere with development of the project site subject to verification "in the field." Also, preserve in-place existing trees that will be within the alignment of the new Community Trail subject to review and approval of the Engineering Department. 5) This permit shall be valid for a period of 90 days, unless an extension is requested in writing at least 14 days prior to the expiration date. Where this permit is associated with development, the effective date begins and the 90 days shall start from the date of final map recordation or Building Permit issuance, whichever occurs first. 6) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 and Variance DRC2009-00020 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of November 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • A,B,&C- 196 STAFF REPORT 12)71Q* • PLANNING DEPARTMENT , Rn HO CUCAMONGA Date: November 9, 2011 To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Subject: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (NON-CONSTRUCTION) DRC2011-00990 - BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS - A request to modify Conditional Use Permits DRC2007-00258 and DRC2007-00258U to increase the hours of operation Monday through Wednesday and on Sundays for a sit-down restaurant located at 12375 Base Line Road, Suite 101, in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Planned Community at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 0227-161-58. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the permitting of existing structures. • RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting that the Planning Commission grant a continuance for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00990 until the December 14, 2011 Planning Commission • hearing date. The continuance is necessary in order to advertise the applicant's expanded request to add arcade games to their original request for extended hours of operation for an existing full service restaurant. Respectfully submitted, Gvnt t� g Jam s R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director LRT:TV/dl • Item D STAFF REPORT fitPLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: November 9, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00671 - K. HOVNANIAN - RANCHO 79 -A request to add a 5th floor plan, replot 9 parcels, add a loggia option to the Plan 1 floor plan and make revisions to the Plan 2 floor plan of the previously approved Development Review DRC2010-00259 for 79 single family lots on 34.1 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, west of the Southern California Edison Corridor. APN: 1087-101-01 through -55, 1087-111-01 through -02, 1087-111-14 through 1087-111-19, 1087-111-21, and 1087-111-27 through 1087-111-36. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226-1. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 88082915 and No. 98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001) and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: • A. Project Density: 2.3 Dwelling Units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant Land - North Etiwanda Preserve South - Single-Family Residential East - Southern California Edison Corridor and Low Residential (2-4 dwellling units per acre) West - Southern California Edison Corridor • C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - North Etiwanda Preserve South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Southern California Edison Corridor and Low Residential (2-4 dwellling units per acre) West - Utility Corridor\Flood Confrol D. Site Characteristics: The project is situated at the base of the alluvial fan that is located at the base of the San Gabriel Mountain foothills. This site was originally a portion of the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (previously the University Planned Development). Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15699, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 were subsequently approved. Rough grading was completed in September 2005. The site is bordered by vacant land to the north and west and by single-family homes to the south and east. • Item E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00671 — K. HOVNANIAN November 9, 2011 Page 2 • ANALYSIS: General: A Development Agreement was approved in 2001 which required the Low Residential standards for all lots within this tract. The property was rough graded in June of 2004. The area was mass graded and the infrastructure was installed. The master developer has installed the main access of the gated community, as well as the slope landscaping and decorative perimeter walls. The tract is currently being constructed and approximately 15 houses have either been constructed or are under construction. On October 25, 2006, the Planning Commission approved Development Review DRC2006-00382 for the development of 97 homes on a 34.1-acre site within the 632-unit Master Planned Community of Rancho Etiwanda Estates. On October 27, 2010, the Planning Commission approved a new Development Review, DRC2010-00259, for the remaining 79 homes. Because of a shifting demand in the housing market, the applicant, K. Hovnanian Homes, made modifications to their previously approved Development Review by proposing smaller homes. The request for the remaining 79 homes would complete the build out. This new request is to plot a fifth floor plan to the mix, increase the size of Floor Plan 2 by increasing the size of the second story, and adding an option to Floor Plan 1. The applicant is required to develop within substantial compliance with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP), incorporating the architecture and design details of the Etiwanda area. Requirements include side-on garages, recessed garages, exterior siding, and specific architectural styles. Design Parameters: The project site is located within the "Upper Etiwanda" neighborhood which • has its own unique architectural design guidelines per the ENSP. The ENSP requires that a mix of the following primary architectural styles be used for at least two-thirds of the units: Bungalow, Ranch, Monterey, or San Juan, and up to one-third of the units may use these styles: Country, Victorian, or Santa Barbara Revival. The proposed modifications are consistent with the required architectural styles and include larger floor plans. The new range of floor plans will be from 2,605 to 3,727 square feet. The previous plans ranged from 2,605 to 3,392 square feet and the original plans ranged from 3,050 to 4,000 square feet and contained no single-story homes. A total of 26 (33 percent) of the proposed house product will remain single-story with the option of a 330 square foot loggia with this approval. The previously approved Floor Plan 1 in the DRC2010-00259 approval is being modified to add 627 square feet to the second story by popping out the right side elevation. The new floor plan will add two additional bedrooms to this floor plan making it a 5-bedroom home. The new fifth floor plan will be the largest floor plan, which is a two-story 3,727 square foot home with up to 6 bedrooms with a. 4-car tandem garage. All the plans have four architectural styles. The proposed architectural styles are San Juan, Santa Barbara Revival, Country, and Ranch. The San Juan elevation incorporates wrought iron details, recessed windows, decorative shutters, and arched patio/entryway. The Santa Barbara Revival incorporates built-up eaves, louvered shutters, and recessed windows. The . Country style incorporates brick veneer elements, a flat tile roof, and balconies. The Ranch style incorporates louvered shutters, recessed windows and stone veneer. All four sides of all the homes have articulation and incorporate decorative garage doors to match the architectural style of the home. Each of the four plans feature covered porch entries that range in size dependent upon the style. • E-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00671 — K. HOVNANIAN November 9, 2011 • Page 3 A. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, Granger) reviewed the elevations on October 4, 2011. At that time the Committee stated that the project was slightly deficient in the design and the applicant was asked to make some small changes and proceed to Planning Commission. B. Technical Review and Grading Committees: The Technical Review and Grading Review Committees reviewed the project on October 4, 2011, and recommended approval. C. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified an Environmental Impact Report in June 1991, a Supplemental Environmental Impact • Report was certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in October 1999, and an Initial Study Addendum was certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in connection with the approval of Tentative Tract Map 16227. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new. or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed the indicates•new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. • Staff has evaluated the development review application and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified EIR. The proposed development does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report for the tract map. • Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. The project was developed with a Development Agreement for the 632-lot subdivision, The site plan, building elevations, and development conditions for the proposed project are included in the development agreement and are generally consistent with the Development Code and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of the development review application. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2011-00671 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and Standard Conditions. • E-3 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00671 — K. HOVNANIAN November 9, 2011 Page 4 • Respectfully submitted, James R royer, AICP u0 Planning Director JRT:SF/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Elevation Exhibit C - Floor Plans Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Design Review Committee Action Comments, dated October 4, 2011 Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2010-002599 • • E-4 SITE UTILIZATION MAP • i I I i I l i 1 I ( , i t II ! i I I I l I L I \ 2 I I; i I;/ t 16226 LOW DENS TY RESIDENT' - \ /� / / j 1 / 16226 / - 1- LOW DE��n(L)RESIDENTI O p II I > �m 40 ./ . li 4.. . _ h taaP,,. \ _ _. NN it mtmattia 4ii. \ _ ._.„(>,,..:_ . O W O it(P*# v _P) '� TR 16 . . ., .- - ®®�®®. A �Vt• v-- l �LOW+DENSITYIRESIDENTIA�LL r.p. . - , pr �� �� . �� _� \' //''.rte ; .1 . 1 S . A, _ �"` ■ / I_ ,- , Al GREEK=BLVD _-... ,„- PROJECT SITE TR. 16226-I/ r Q LOW,DENSITY RESIDENTIAL , C .:_ 1 cdc i BY: TRACT 16226-1 1• 'PREPARED '901 SENDERO DEL GHARRO F ; r% DRG2010 00256 �, RIVERSIDE, GA 12504 FAX(951) 180-54 04 q`<2 ( g EXHIBIT A E-5 . • N to O CO O ,r ] Q O • rf!, J7tl��- u Cr r h' JJ •...._.u. �� i ,r4r41 Ir,� Ya re• . 1 rare. p :c EMI's I 1 !I. 'y4�!I.1 YIIIIIIPIIIIIIIItlII j > v rn� Wl�l �,+I .._ .. ._ &11 0 rrnim� y�i{.. r I4.4I gg .`rr..ir 4�Mi 'li ,, I71L� I- •n.i FN. x T n y i QJ : / F7 _W Fo �_•4 0 CVY OW / • ¢0 Ow Z U4' po 1> __ __ Z > NO M __ , 1 Z II\ p I•ti'IiI 0 II • 1/� a j� w ii tik I=M x r y. x K r ut% a r P„ j p�nrp O• t LW -E E h° 1 a7• Yl�rc o X LW >c l icu"l.\ '/jhil,0 1 w w• I S•mim% ir. li *V Z. n o -IIIIPM .. • N rtt\ 1�`\t ir�yr W w O W U Q a a.IT s iii I If4_ W n w, .F r w, M�1 ce: p r M'� i �; x % l r 0._ ! F ti. kraa MIm. un 4 ., mm 1t1,111 , z I1iI v� r 1 i u w I�_. r IIh11GI -_II IIi N [ . i �If + w LLL n � DII; ,r w rr: ruy isrii ai 1 If IPi. I ,Lr r m.,r Cnl I fr. I 1 . . I::til.1C� iY!u, Il DWI,•• I - lyr�r 'i I,Iidd}I r I. B pg 't�rn?ii ••• -4 II tl =I. ' • I r.r,n,•1 LL II 1 �luIIS1� /AMU' �'I ILLICIT Jtrttrtrt. :iTL(▪n:L r Z '�" 'I�� nr"rc` 1 J rill_ ((� n`u is _ p1 It 1 —;- f��xriw wr Sala , , . r , 1 a ® 444 dflIIIIIIIIIIItlIIIIN";Marrrrmr. I 4 EXHIBIT B ",° E-6 0 0 m yy ' II as ���'� (IZL${J,'N �� ❑Int o •1N1 ,JI11 ■�I■■ t tratri — I'4 rot: —I— Z 1 111 alai YM1� SIB 1 1 - l1i !1 i �[I zn,r ^I f- i ill I r r > ca;, O ' O 1t�I.81II;I h, 1 .... rTO 3 IIR1 -- 11114 / r. !�,?1 i :.:iii'Ceti • [rerrrrrtr ■ l - '' 111 x . II(V /- rV d . a ' 17,1. x /// -� F i • r > CO)Ce 0It 3' on ;�� / 01. aa> Z / _ co > A.;.: < w ■A■■ OF �I 'y0' 1 == w l,t •• ■ V C IAu , ■ra■ �f �/ � mom 1 a c4 0 U.. /F r. 1 °o W rt.rrS �I�II w 'llj, •••• .. In�rlrai GTE f X • AW,!� ...... Svfff �.a% I=mo w w gym."kK,'S'�I'1 • :�`I `• Z v n ,, U o_ F Sri4 JI,� — 141' 3< " � ; II a= _0: U in< �11T 11 ■...�� tic:. m Ilec Z �r' �I�1 Z ° ¢ O ar,/�fll . 114 �..■ oao , , ,rr ..I o rx < x V �., V r wa 11� y iiiil - ' �4 w MM. �; x g I1!b.,it •..II. z A l`, �(,'' • • N Pb 0 co O X t1 '!hey`�1L V O IlFjfl !!in �' . :I'llfnyr: -a .P.:I X11' x, 'r 0 10.:4 —�-, 1 o I L C_ .Lj1 1lO 1 J1 1 't, ' o I I I ,l• i'....,(1:.! !. � 1§1 O j .�� . / lSiil Of (ill' ] 4r a ; 1 i .t 111 l � 1 =C7 1 .e • p��llli 1 � I 6 • c 'F flld';, • 'tiff 1 14 xfi e N• ildjllld ' \ ®I Ir;Y Z Il Lilll!!Ihi !00131_ \� o _-1 O it 4 w,ll ∎t .i—I W lllj*. l: Iil a� V. W Y1 Ix.1 oW < 'v zi — °m a S y.a= x C x '•.q r q `_ La. N y O Tha sr�rj. �` Z 1 , c U �i W Ilia® 1 Z rc —z il N • rte; 4 r 1 i}/ _ i .,. . oo: . _ • \ ©o; Z ! ' I i ,�oo!moo p : — Y. p�rz.�„ E-8 moon. mw:-u:xz.ru n 0 0 m 0 X .e. :fgt.' N o cc I 4E-r • o P•,! ■i O Oe l==1 0 1- ,; °0 Z a,:• a ; 0 ' Ii I loo=f . • Io . co , i • I - r 1 li'�i,1 �=, ■ am= Q "z J I a...!•'- •M- f- Z - O, X a // N. • C��= 0 V Z < >r - °�uF/' ��t' r= ' n Q 0 [� �5. .4 : % , s-- N Y a IyIy''Y ,Vi.riY'„i• Z �", - —' Z 7,F �000 „ © ('s� u W M"17�moI f o- o Z 4SII!i! • Nis ? __ 000�, . kZ I....-t r j t— V. j 4 •�©oo .yip 't . 1!'1'''�rt�oo �a!1 t 1 3I Z; i.•.ilif�000 I�t IM 3 LLr E-9 . n .T4 m fM kk _ m o 0 h SF.. N - N LI 111 I' Vr / a6 f- 1� L f O. _ a I a ,-. VII p I i.......api lizm g 'i 8 8 S 41 c•\ __it -, 1 tan r• F 1 ,, IIL•/,ii� jt H0 eit iii_m.„ 1 U r Z ,t. ,.¢ _ -,,, ni I•TTe.= ?tom�' -I j � ,ligali �� ri Ce ra MO. of tiln 1=1.r _L. i ., l L_I� � r�.T+( , h I', I 41 '� i F u. ` Fs I 0 cr Q ro m `¢j a iw w �f J :,fl� I 3: 3 £3 W - 4L'�II �I O S ' ¢ O O - ledl U ICI I t i w. o m SFS1.2., .� 0 F/i O i u ft • ¢ Q. et�z a xn.. <J W ,74 6'I'll": .."-- .1 l''' Z CZ t _w I I 'pf Xs Z to L'1'trti fki5 IIIII 3 0 3 N. Q: I ` r!um ;gam keel W .,1111 Z � Y 4T■ �- U Frranrm pus {a:^_,i ¢® �.zzc/ _�`i r1 „ —! 0 i/ (.11?-.:1- _L _ ' w'�1 II L II n ;i �.� 00 'c '1 0 5:-i' ®viler 1 s - - ,i t or 1 V ! __ ;8,ru I c 11 I g- I. ' JI H \L I in I . .itt. i V;' OF, II =-....71 p ��- 1. I . �oI ■ w= e„.f. a> • E-10 ,,,—n, _ II Cam' 0 V °o U ! tin/ —IT II Z< I v_ t ry � �p�! x 2I / i' 1�; I I s�' �Ip I—^'a /NA �� �' ' Q a SIR ■ ���,. r /III"„ 1 . o 1 I \ NM 17I i i e Ir .1 ; , iE❑❑o Wo■ Hop LWV il o *1Jtti I � 1 ,wi f [ 1I� 4' 11�� 115V��II III C���111 `�I i��'.Y, I�®I ITTTi 1 4 ��Wi�V --A'l� 1 - h 84 m ` ''`\ i i =IIIyI1�I1„„yyppI j( W .Pp : 16II 1"1 5 • ,I^?. \' ��LIY'JWM4'f !. i V 4 �If I it 1 0I, =_®`' 111 'ill =: > � a ur. , 5 ,W > I p ; m I ; 3 f 3 \ I O� I o z I I W W - `IM IVI411111111VIIIIIIIIV I II I o : O n'°.gy.�°r I o p_ r =° - w> u cur •I, F 1 " lil O 2 ' u as I uummd`r Ii-�F+il�p 25lf�l zo'< Wu 0 .1 QI"L < • I p�i4 4 I SANE I 3 u 3 X" Q o 'IBI IE�IIi I x/ iVIVVOVhIVVllll �k 7„ I=�j! I z y h am' f� �^�'1 Alt 44 u (Aar MC MU i�f —L fi o � !Int I C L -I!I w L,IPI i \J 4, I L- u K aa , �' I ;. ,7if'', II ui }',/+ �I ] E 1 2D IC I PI I X1.4 ifR1 :r lI I r�fl' I re-------1 al .:�. lid 4„,, i ..= ,H, I I I F I Ll aI _ /Ip. v z t u S F c • N F E-11 T : r 2y # 0 ^i"- r� N 0 d W 3 1:�— j. pi _ • w wv 0 H u J LL 0=°00 } Ais / I®❑❑❑0000J :.too eh5�:r ° r°oo°o' y ;h 14 1 41000 2 8 jy, 4 \ / i I sh®❑ a u ','�11.�fis �1 a�''I I' _ v �' i7i uGi6 i i u u' II. i DISTI rrrer al qrt it ¢ '{ i''11411% O❑OO 1 r5 I1/�oOO C S 37� H ,.II7 OOOO a 4 OODOI a ; Lie d o o, ❑OOH 1 I I S d�OO 7� OD II's' a °o°oi ❑❑O❑ A�{Y �n 9��170�0 �� :¢¢ ' 111:1 1 qq yW ,� F `.4r1 1{s 51 AIif�P' z r �(v _ n.G. 3>R ❑OOO _ 0 ,;. L�OC ' I ' irvz a�' I�th_ ROOD L I REF —i +I II .. ° r I: Ii oI r Iu ^, I • ' N al nFO ; . ) a Q it'a ow o ;'I zoos.- as a6 Wt J£ U �Ik J '�' F1 ]£ J 1. W N W 'T •ry J a w F w F { / ; W F U' W A ^I I p O m F O > 1ri 4,-^ IC9 n = _ . 11 O11 - '� F - u Tp; W Q z o u u i1 l' •1 t o W Cr, a k � .: o m3 th 88', jZi o f�' yi?h _ 1,�1 "rid '114,1----J frill �3°u3 p _ - 4i q[.: osas' �1°�°°o°�I ': ,�4.,w Z r tAH%t'4 'Jl'�">_ 1i✓I`� �s C Z,tit 1 0 It,Ni h G' 1 . N� u `�1- etlt ( 1 If, —�l w II^^Iit igutfr , c�OM ^ 111,1. l{I'tyY Ina \I ill; i Km`;l 1 �;1 it It U,r Iron , .� �1-v, : - , fh f —7I r ; , Irv, aces11 ll I L II' I 1 `,• 11. i ;,I r e®tic .�; 1 : PA,II Fr: I On I- � I =, Y 1 4 m—" u �� 1 1 1 -r 4q- r - 1 r * II ' �� ICI f / < J I , f N - V P G fr o f 1 i N 9 1 limy vv vvl � F / r Z r > J �r 1 / ii W I 1 • �BEIBB ODOR RII h E-12 • .' :F"; f}�,L1 O q Y . .1 k (0 O 3 r bk l4;1p //I •111111 flhIW ¢. o V If"PI I .a , } “ ¢ N cc GI e Rs,�oo� 1, i I I� 11 , --- < • y RI 6 -mss Iq b'', , 0❑❑i I z 1 w' o Ir ,'� . - yl : o— V e. u� "� =W ` iT/ER 11111101111 o �, i,a I�'sI J1�' W ,ey ]6.!II1 �I t/< o= I�r ti IRVIIIIIIIAIA-0111111 !� � _C �; NIIIIIIII�11161VIV , m„ H A k - ., - •, =: [ o , I—] Y Issi ' aa� u �\ I oQll I 'lIIItlNiIIIIAIIAA]IIIIII 4 ma NIIVIIIVIIIVI1A 9.,l�—°� j o � M IIIIIIII� I l ' v 4r '�. A11111tllllill!Illlllltl tll • ' r F > k ' 4rAl1 c� �m I r- ti ixmmaxy '' heir !et II imp' -- 11J a r•�i -'41;1'd I�G=11 A' '4 W 7.oI_ 1! �__ 1 „ III, 44 0111���, - - 4 MNL— �: J.� N ]r-ra'hMI'IIIIW____ 1a L y w,ycdh_ 1 44111 T-, s o 5i p a yc.�>.` w o + j x J !O!Li III o¢ I [ e a ii w x to° �� _—_p 3u NliIi III 3 u £`u N E I w a S.; =1=r ¢ ��I w 0:P N I ✓ 'i' IBS.; � % , l it o K z ;y O 19dIlIWIIIIIIN x _ = Q N▪f V0 •�� lu K Z2 _ I .` _ ¢ W R• I 'tea" 11 MI '-..I y ' 1 Z x nGIIIIIIIJ1111111 �' IL—el a I z Ply1ul f,, •=I O � � d `EI Fi I I I I C Y,1 w 4,, ,ii III] ii'li i 1 fl1Z o� r 11+ IIII i I I'I pjl III� I1ill� �� _IM _I ]J _,--,'8 vi,r r I I II ,- 5= Iii, y/ I II III I= i� I ^s._ Icl u- f' ] ' TI 1IIIII ¢ Min ` � 0 fE Yi, r 'II/ LL CIll !IIIc ,A IL ie III G2 y�n��� r ___ u ] EM EH E.jl' La`s _ n: I 1111140iii'i .iv /,il�i ] ] III r� — I_i I }� oa / I] III _ z / 111111111111111IIJ1111I HIM A x • k� II NIJpI11111111111 I NM 111 �i II 1 I I 0o 1,s�'„ I�-�I I oo. • • .w E-15 ]<,o],—]n N 0 0 N o X N - • a N U ��in' 6. Munn n O 4 '1HI F ,.Ili IN A w ` i Lp i � >. I '- I J boy r .1 w ; �� o rusw ,is zw0 A . 1/2,41 i d E ekt girl M c r I 60.,w I F.:1:M*Inwuwmnn p '¢ lurvmwurnr --. I 9r veil'A x !I� > a)) +:13 J',.. Till g III ez ' ,a WIT-7 LH O m ii N s wpni �A'' -- x Oz— n . • Ka 4�r I y'' 66 Q O t? 7 Ark IR J'h La I Fhl�� Z I. mcz N tyl R,i twit a w o I -, nt I i - , I ccw • i i ,_ _I w 1 t- � , {4, ` I hF{: r4i — ¢.w 441**Iv.la il Z 0 a0 0 00 a O. X 0.-r wE �CC 0x E-1 4 • :R. . 6 - s--- (I; •1;1:+,,,I.e, 'la° li,4; iitiolipiii:Lh I 0 • 1:4,114.0iNii -4 0 'IllAqiitith 3ii 4 0 A 0 z w‘0- eit'10, ,i: g a 4-5 ittiiht : -. „ 101,:il 1 1 0 • s,.1' li■ 1.] 1 0 1;1141901.,` --fl ] \!f '1111.It 1i2i;;111,""" iii I 0 IMPel.41Ailgi ?NI/ 0 Ilillt "i!r:' 0 PlAidh'414 4i4!'151#' 1111.1.1VI: 2 '14;;41Ifi, .....-..- 2-.r. 11 14:11.11 MI ..fl,bj•til,1 Illik,ii:!:11! •••■ 11:1111,■,.1 ,. .• 1..1=-,- i=i I 11114r iliii .I' tt:1'.1.:;!.. 7.--t:-■:- -,_1. ' ;; iii :17 I 110:: --, 1 ,10414;iit ., ti,irp; 1;;i ba----;; _ ;Ias ;,ii: 1, '—1 p,411.r.; I dato, ir, ii', A _,_ /l'i ill' I ;I: ir-fil z . 1! z - 1- l!ilit • -==li I . 4,. a ---2.JC i , __,-..-,..L.„..1 < 0 '------39 In: : , _-:--Ty ;Iiiq . II L3- 1 ;., _.L_:rattli w 17 i :Flii: .1 b 1. .--• MIN' I .. -;=: 01 i• 1 1—::-..- ce w i 644:14 ._,i. , ■AIMS, !Itv",11:: • t‘ ta :1111iitli;IV 1 rib z r1•1311617)01?)11a. - _ . . . : - 0 ch m o .. u■ cc 0 z j u 0"S X 1 :• P' '; 0 z . 0 E et ; . . , , --: „---. - '•1; il /---.7-_-:-_'-- Ai (LI III:I- - rc I 6 z IP- w 0 Z 3011 Pae=ii .11P '1 ,,4n w pp, _ .. r c 11'1"., 0 . ' ■ ' "L21 Z t7) ;'!'sE" Vt: II 1,, i to trL* '' --rs. 1 .4 a ft c___ < :A14;,-,tir 0 T I IA1711 g '. •I 49:tratl'• 1 4.21, ./Pivt'l - --. : 4 t. . ; ,tir nuti_■-u amaii."---- , . frr,tz LA AINIMMing. 1 I kilt-4,11/_i t n d I ,...1- 1.,Thriirt- r----,,, ' * dtrrii - .. tH, ....-.3 ..:q . . . • itnn"--■;•;') - **.11:1=11 I • . . , ^ r- caL.=1 s '5 4,..c, I r.1,■;;;Iti•-t, , • 0.1 1. trW2 1- ' •4- se-2p-:' 1 f---,-A . . 1 lir--- -ald) - c.Artrif?' 1 a ti, . g III y IrTDc I ' I SrE ii,. ---..r•-y ..: [.. . 4.4.1 T -5e.;--- k9 r) '" tr.-z!.:. ...... """"G"'"" E-15 - lc' •:er-7:11, • uuu cuu„Kula N O o m , a b 1 N y,0l ''i',4,1i '3 11, P 0 8 cr .Il Siivarl L , O :i9 dic. :, I I; ;Ili © r ihli , , gg dill"liih 1 �:! II 1 1,111'1.,tc,.., I III: Et LD Ii141441FIliil' ©� . 411, El l,iyljl11I{I.IIK Pit!! ❑ lial�i117!!,i ! Iii I!'llrf 11,,i':'VMS!. I ,!! jliiy,!,4., ;. 111'441 I� i I�l ;irliy. �o ,!,44,II!!. JI .(J..3 ISO , i�N„lii ( i3°�iigil.':1 y, roc w1.I.111n111S' '.111:.X• �. 1illi:�i` .1111 i;l,I,I;fi�v _ isi 4` i;il; l!%% —1 �e 1 pt.' p Z ;'�1., NV �1,. o 14I 1 l fL 7 F > !ylll■ _,L3 ' w ! 4ik,.foAnl!Im z w - 1IJ4Gi l - �` Z m q iyy rsr LL'9 n2 = �1 '. a l Us. ;47 Oa Z i -P en ts� t,YQ UPo Q o !4 ♦ Ei' y r_ N a x 0 Z ti -el r3 Slis•x ` h`t�1�;1,1 et e yid-' C7 J t w 11 1"•II 'V'111 © El .' ,' Z w ig K ti, 1, q dP lr -,.T. it � ; 1 QI • I'•.�]i1i tic:Fe_IEE 4' "'11 F al z 1 fig,1* f7 1,. �re' ' i �Y ,w i I . Ihw,_l II-_ 1 1 4L 1 ,-� - MO a _ A 1 .ors, 1 .p1 .p s -9, t. M v.,Y'!v I. 11 Z � I a 111111.11- 1511/3 2 0000 0 r : ' \-- INPFA ,i4 Hrilil IAA Lt • ;'L+B. aIS -! h ' i}' 'd'S.' n. r ,'' ai)'� --- Itlnwl t�•Ilif�rltl E-1 6 n o 44 oo c c I . ._ +'s:.lit —i j �= : U Mil � i e • r 0 ;� ■ ICI f t; I-- - ...„, 7/1 Fal II I z /AA\ alt p;L1 1 lnl r anima z iz,_ r < n '" w' 3a-�cL�1 ou 4EIQI 3 °n if Trig4T/ u 0 .r '• I 1! r.1 z �n t 4 j•c• . • _, h_l , , :::; -< , O ‘ , , ....=,, a alia ._� 17. ;1 W w▪`zI it `wa • . � 4/ O1z E uz• I°�r I'. / !s. n _ °� 2 0 `4, � a I W_ Oz Y 'du z w ll�F x U z II Z / N" Q o '-\ FF 1 a' I FR S s Z x Y:� tr 11 =i'r CI 1- L 3' P D e` N al;r ir:l W f MI 1 CI I IF .2 I, l@ ± I I]I I III �n i L n-ti:P we�il,- Vd c/ a / „ I ; L II 1 „,:".:21' m 1 l I/ - II II 1 < /� Q ®III J� .i 11 II ` 1 �I lT ire Ill [ IIl loads?! 1 j ` .��i _ —� I t_ __ {' ��� n F O �' i�1 II U+—AIL_ O z, S _p -a Jar'-IX,it 1_- r I V Ile,' tt� ; _, � 5 L_ 2 In_ t 9. zrc W 'LUX: I W :up ip 1JL _ = 0 LI _ w 1l. Z.2 1 0 ==_ l I I I � � V_7 •mi43- _ • < I—'f F Z le i WF W ¢I of n w4 vI'Weld E-17 � n R b S O a o yy I �A ,t I ®c iv.�, L N U C 0 .1 t O ■L1E ' e_ 1 .•71 . i EL,. h D 1 t;��7n O J 41 N 1 I. �' 11r' II 11 m lMLnm ,, i� o I J 7 /∎.s �'', =i _ 4.. I II'�1�1+I J 7, 11 I„ m ' I I111111IhIuIn1111 ��'i z (a ,,I��@��IIIVIIIIg, "1 ._, _, J.1 AV ; 1�, I' F Q •* LI. :, \we , Its, ir_-...-4. > D o ! DaF '. . ! 1. - W m < s 1I II D s El s :1g �n II :, 'li N n a D >m I` I' 1 IX i �� 1II M 61�IEI�IItldBlll�lll h.11!� ' z x I ° ELISE i� 1' aI! u 0 o rkY f- N �' I oo '�l�lli; ' l E a . A s LA 00x mot J ¢W Irl, ` ��; ,khle-, I �I� O t 1,r U= I{'1 �I II,,. 1 "u Id I:,�.;i r�l"i�� I� 'Y' 1,q G{ {,(' c I \, I. °i Irk • I 11 -- i ' CIJJ 1I1 � 5 + 4 'nv �I A rul - • 1:, Yi. 1101 �{1 �2 i z sm I I -—_ r� N O � T _i I i O rf: Q 1��I41 !Ylpp D �Ta 4 z o 'L hu 7, cr ill I j1 y!� "� I i ct W W u ';y' I col il kw �,.h. 0.J �F u m Uz ¢> �Z O> m6 IiYIOI.LLWin W 81I Nfld E-18 e,• 7 e ' 1 .- 4.� ki 1. .. - % ;rn g:j o 1tvs:(:,,' :' t;r `. N O I{fir I. I LO o N CC ®❑❑❑ • •- ®❑t■HBB ?�", I © Jf is ®❑❑❑ I, alh1' ¢' ®❑❑❑ Ih 51 r ' relli O�o o I -< ; .�",�y noon pII% • 1,,•1ynl \tom tIP,N'le VIII ;°u{q I pp, yh �i, rM I I',i ,l� - .3 s i �1i4'I L1 '•-aI7 ■��Y■, w i'� �nI,WIjj�1�N i® ?m L{ y,� q.. 7 ■■■■ o [ ,f 5' NE•,'..nfr'aY6 ,'!,�til i 3u I� � [[}�'��,��p 7•�� _ - Il DT.,;,..:,.......i` om .'1 . °hl o :,',:/// _, raL Atom'�rl � SSA' o , II�i-•I � x'! vI°e,+ Z :lJij1 `j g g ' oz gyp, --- �CZ 1 �I' T �• la!:�' w• =F ° o 2,9 §3-1.i� T > ^r ' w z 11' ooI L ,.5 r -r F� = a • Rip, og�i� I.1:D ,I w- U < Q - o � Z n D R^7^ N" a O / 88 It z x 1 m128 CBB #./.„p1 4,plu/ r___ _ a •Il-,1.!b F '1', Ott 4,r�4: w yi 4 PO: , 0-n,� ",�n-F 77 ilir+t '! CC \ C,�' lot I ; Lri1 ' W ��f 01 } pp�y� >o, II• h�l? Vali I�'!�—JI'yq�.{ r r 4ni FF o< : 1I l C i l neatzl FILM Da a i 0“.10 willow I i n li s�n11 _ y Minn rrml nn. ■I■n I I i f 1: , Ininn 2 JII I . iii? 11. 1 (r:^IIIti MU DD z ��,V"'4 : r- C?I1 9 �?1.[.41-+t Ies■■u of o N Ir 9 -ii f z 4111; If t" t„rI. hJ �; ��'aF. �, � _Ii O q.�,l „I _ > fit,, �, b �, 1.: I, , L 3 J .may ' , L_ > ''1 f c- V II-�.4:i u, w v'P \\`\\IA.ry, N p m t ii sill U<I � 14% • %'� -11 mF UN Q2 �1• O> "LL „,,z,,RW:\+ E-19 I•' '$ O La rt it "k" O wv OS: EI � 1 , 1 : :❑�. ,B • j 'f� I :❑ ❑ !--; II Plir Min 1011 M'Wj ���I W o ' 1.1 l IA' e n I °c u 0 i m iPr� y.. k. � ' AlgiIglNql'IqN W o ! �� ��ito I,i14 2 r,I. = 00 i� it iM' fIM� P�. ;ii iF q4 I "f 4rMr . --� n :' ) ' A 1,10414 ..eSJ M O I 1- ® II Z Le iv r ER (t r' r Imo: " Q S4 iliii j B I O\- ° I�\ � I II —1 I�I 0 p i I--J o �i.1I�yy V ' LL AL, III `\y: • In a w WW °: . J c m w 6 ` i 'r A IIIIIIItl11i 0 0. 0� f 4,..-012v, re P x r ill/!� n o< ', 000 — W- 0 i •4 glo 11 su X' = z Q` a / I I tiI w 3 13 <Q > a �p� Phpyl =lf� z" x II 161PilAifiy o 4. 1 Ill ! •i O o INUWdNd C ^_ I I111111!NIII' _ i� MMnMI1i9tii!�I0 >o N z W y = Cr, o 11 I it m"o a Li rc ` y� x WI C ^ 1111111 po �II- '51"'F'!11 W �>�ul f1: k �I a' jl� Ft i ` - Y�glgqlil J x riu��M 1 t� III ;111111, I ', `\ I 111 II IIID q1 : n I- l' I II I igralli li mug= i I1 ;' I ' II I I a;rm Lei• J ®® I I ' �` " ' I IIIIAIIIIIH 4 Ft i MI MI ! 1q ®Q z III;, r II ' r INBIVIIgI11N1111 I. Mpl�pMa9NMMi. o 6 mil. r-I D, '11'fµ �1Mf U_ ¢ IMiIiIUMaIMMI J y IIyF O! i u F l,1, OjI�. MIIM]Slll�li�l • i 'vN@ ism `�,}I-1�f r u m a. ttz tt_ O> n4 v E-20 • _ N . 0 r.,... 0. ‹ ; • N 0 • •0-16L > i....:........ tir I 1 1 w : • 5 . co 1 o • i t. • ; D e ■ (111.1– i i a.– w z 4221 I : re lun9 1 re. - to.-:) rentil. 1-1-718,11:01,,,,, / 2 .I N j 01 ■ r'--- , ii:[- - r . { 0 / ..„ "--3' r• : 7,. • .: l . . 0 < b ce 6 In I 1 o cc a o • U re 1 a 5 b .9 I z Li • 0 o g w Z J 0 ' a —/ LI I : 1 0 1 I I : , 1 . 1 ; . / IC ;0 i - :1 i-,- I- , ti- ---- - ---, , L , ,,. t _ .. ,. ...,„ . , e EXHIBIT C .,......„,.. E-21 r to 0 O •• O X _ .Z 59 _ rr 0II ° o ❑m° ua §I� y' 00 ‘j Eli r fm ii: a OF \6` �' n y N._ fo y� �: OI 3 'Lira I i ©�aj1 .. 11 in <Z4 -44I : I lI I �1 1 i rti Oa ]Z I i / — 0 R - I �c — —WL 14.. -.m-I p L r o a ,i T_ 1 ,I 1 1 > a- W -7I IITT 7 I - Wt II 1-01 m . 1 . I) — •o 00 II o.i 11 , p 0 nl p m f Z--q n 2 • O r1/41 0 z a_ o• w V a z w III <S Q a to Z - W K Y O W icr z m am J r I 0 e• < O ¢° o r L R Jr 1 . N -� p o I a I ®- r m I 111 __-HI I 1 ___ UI �;��_I p „ ; 1 - r 11 ` fiOc leg' }to o f . a rc 00 'Th-t— I m _ I. W L Y Lt.ir all aml 3 00 Iii m ® .i m • E-22 ■17 0 0i 0 N — < ° N U 0 • III , z To 1 0 0 a 0• • u , _ . <• .7 o 2 1- 6 ‘ ' Co •C 1.„ X CL x W a g et 2 1 'al \‘i 141 Oct E I- / elpill; 1 1 0 ° I I I . 0, 0 IEJ ; o L L z w , Z — —of' 00 r , z 0 1 I 0 ,. F- _ , L i z : _._ i ok_o_ a. 0 w 1 -1 1 rE i II ' 9 I a 0 It. 2 -- i 9 I 0 I>i g;91) i y to : ler)1.' 1 0 ft X 0'9 I 1 , • Ca-n C40.1.; ,ir° ! ..," ,, ,, ,__2_, 4 , , , _ „, 0 u ;„ OF g IC. . 20 .- • ; 3 I 0 U IN 1 814 LI• 1 1 w Z w a et 1 - 1 3 - w _ Li X ' i J -I 7 -1--€ 1 gLCE i 1.7 , .9 <b - 0 t• 1 x g i' '' ” z x 0 L x G 11.1 - ; I 2 G 0:e 1; ' -• 0- • . -• G TM 1 1 , ,_ o` C . 0 •'..• 1 ■ 0 0 1.• rir 1E i!: - s -.... ;03 , , = L m=ME.1' __- - i 'E) L L ' I I/ z w al ;two;1 COLI01.• • •• IV NVII E-23 - 0N I o 11) - 1. „t•-,65 3 7 N U 1?: X 0 • r rl / a a P 0. 5 i ii r,-----,1 [0 I It 1 2 - . , . m a4.9 1 1 o 8! 18 17 _ c„ .r ?, ID. • .-- . = o . 8-. It ° -1.i• . LP. a F • i.> LL 1- I — • (8 r I • b i) r_110111=ron.,,, kr.- ,E.! 1 6 A – , 4, , 11-.-, id3'0- 8 iia O , , . , ' , ,b • • • II , -ii.1 , . t-1_, S,, .,, zt--, • I 4 - j „ a i , . ■ 8. . 12 _ : J , . laf'" 'a a.a ° • ii, -a I 2.la n al VI 5; li ',Ill ' I. ' 7 7 ' I II / . i 0 [T H ' : 1 ,-.- 2 4 1 I I r i ; I :1 y 0 C- o 0. 29 , , 8 12 L Ls.'n 5- 11 IzT I-- ' " I I 5 IL r N t■ wl n ., --- gib' ----' I ii - m I ..-8. 12 0 C IA Lrtilf—j _ in.4 0 2 nu „i ei, Z _ 0, ,_.,„.„.. 2 MIllartlq -.4.0. 111311-1 1 _:11, I m F 11, re I N IS 'r■ Y? . _ ■ N, o 9 E .• ., 1 ay w° (, LI / .(.. - _ __I m- I I 1 NI \\ : fr. .. . , OLA: Z J .. M j . ; —I /III I :r < I, 1 a 2 : 3 : .: rill , 1 _ . , ____ _ 1,• 1 • • ,I1 . • . _h____HI: ,..,, mu: , --' I N._ ___•__._r.___-- 8 ,, , MS I 'll 5 - — = 1 _____ „,_ 1 ig 1?_• 111 — g tLoz° ,0. —I -0. OX 11 I o w a- III I 1 . :11 11 , L., • , i L ..... .----! 1111.11100011. umIlli•YLI E-24 N • 0 0 N , N - 0 N • 0 0 w > > 9 IL n . I O I I w Via . "£WoY i- U 0 J O a i J w £ Z O F _ 0_ w o o o <9 n x In 0 z o° 2 `- w U a • Z a z Id 3 Za 'o r _ - - —_ 1 Z X x i O I {f d w k_rin r I O CC a w£. O�n w Sw O.W o Li n 0 ,o,.cv E-25 1s 'b ( aLL aa-t� sPi 5Eat r ' d 'a i tl .a zp�P, s n a yaw. :-y oa 6 3 '6e e -a-) Cog m¢ e v,1' N N b N a,a s ! AA r , . vim E t __ Q Q tia. • 52 -, sQ 1: , aQ s 1 , / i/ .. z e T F-� STtZ N W H a oTh -J \..,1\P "o Jr: J SA �9=n tp 614 ' a.s . I .": U n • ' f�` n 9-99 II���.: 11000 I. = s�90�m 0900990000 �. • • � 'a.4 i • a . J a a •a j 111111191110111119111110111110101111111 S 9 101100000001010000 X1100000100 U B si , 0011118181 11 Ea • Atka 919019090990 90109109101119090119 P . F -- — 19000IIO000IIIII0IIIII0I0II9I0II n s, EXHIBIT D E-26 11§ R 1 1 1i '2 ". 5 �r , �F NI d r R o 2 l ,L' } I - btu ',t ells' ®' 1 e . + \ �. a "`�i�Ii iii q� il , f �1l��1 ' W Ll 9 � ., 1'6; WI r;iit'!Iss!' • •zi a..r..„4 ., , , ,t_,„ersie pp e \ P qo•7 t;„ Si irli* **14zz,k. q� �� \ ,Y� ;n4 II triji ;(:( f Mt R ,j fir X40 ` 'ts IF, I _ail ,r . .... . „, . •. ,... , ,... ,. .....:::::\,, ,,,,:„../ .,..:„. .\,„... , . 4, 1 1 .et.... , . ./.. • i L_- G <A, ~ II - ^ R J . / Y''' _ O i � O rr LTT: I e�'Jr' • E-27 F g! 1I >a , V u ;el 4 NZ) LO 1- ram; b1111.11111111111/11/11.111201a ,' ' ' lintiatisoaraj. li spapiatilrlw,aN,.... SlOriliNia I Viritgii illiiti / / r\litiot f -ARA setsisSIPAL.Wili 1 \ g/I •ss ate. �a 4�t �- r / Ng ii '�►e� T- am®"` ,iii i CAE'g �' la iiiiii sj.t Saar-A-W-1a' Illitirdi 1 I i filW fli 'El 11111 tali � �_'`�� �� 1 i© b ,idi lNmr 1 • 5 -1 3 rm ;- 3 1.4 is!- Ian i � Ann els n gg E . n— 5 1D —n� � F 1 lila �, i , �j_ YARCO4 Wore -� J `� �Iii III f 7?J ' 1 (� t _° _S:_ , .; �r I ._ pia +"`ltl I L,( I h�cs�h' ..-....�{ .. • • � = • E-28 ? S •5r i i _ , h1 d 55 fr A a a i 1i _ 1 h $ as ° ! Fi •Og 1 ° .i 5, ..7, .9, g' E •z o ° 2-` f • °,,@ V,K , ,T, 94° RAR Sgi a e N s, N iklinplakirman • . • \- . ont, il • # \ - ...._,...„,„ , 0. imr,......ra : „Eat .. •,,,,>,--rret • - ofs, itidwg � ' r' imis i rta, t I.,• 4 � � i >�''�i moo,—q�_� G I , �;��-iii .0 igr ®-s ®'mss ide it_. .:..-- ___. . ‘.,,,..11,0e7/0Airi,,toi pit / Tiorratim • hit i ., ,. . „.0, a • „"414, • , - —11 NM t ' Atalmil - 4111r104111101,./416110-141111r i ' . 1 g 1 \ ',T, t\sek. *WI W., ..7 ,i7 MI '' 1 7.:,s' Atilt Cc. 1,, 4.12 7•• . \ak,,,,,yr',, g . 4:4 ' ---!::::,,---,' .. . • . i..s: „ v , ,1 • /I , .. 2 N W �1�. PlL[y _ _ • N N E-29 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:50 p.m. Steve Fowler October 4, 2011 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00671 - K. HOVNANIAN - RANCHO 79 - A request to add a 5th Floor Plan, replot 9 parcels, and make revisions to the Plan 2 Floor Plan of the previously approved Development Review DRC2010-00259 of the 79 single-family lots on 34.1 acres of land in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, west of the Southern California Edison Corridor. APN: 1087-101-01 through 55, 1087-111-01 through 02, 1087-111-14 through 1087-111-19, 1087-111-21, and 1087-111-27 through 1087-111-36. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226-1. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 88082915 and No. 98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001) and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already.considered in that Environmental Impact Report. Background: A Development Agreement was approved in 2001 that requires the Low Residential standards for all lots within this tract. The property was rough graded in June of 2004. The area was mass graded and infrastructure was installed. The master developer has installed the main access of the gated community, as well as the slope landscaping and decorative perimeter walls. The site is bordered by vacant land to the west; by single-family homes to the north; by Day Creek Boulevard to the south; and by a portion of Tract 16227, built by K. Hovnanian, to the east. On October 25, 2006, the Planning Commission approved Development Review DRC2006-00382 for the development of 97 homes on a 34.1-acre site within the 632-unit Master Planned Community of Rancho Etiwanda Estates. Of the 97 homes that were approved, only 18 were built before the downturn in the economy. On October 27, 2010, the Planning Commission approved a new Development Review, DRC2010-00259, for the remaining 79 homes. Because of a shifting demand in the housing market, the applicant, K. Hovnanian Homes, made modifications to their previously approved Development Review by proposing smaller homes. The request for the remaining 79 homes would complete the build-out. This new request is to plot a fifth Floor Plan to the mix, increase the size of Floor Plan 2, and add an option to Floor Plan 1. The applicant is required to develop within substantial compliance with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP), incorporating the architecture and design details of the Etiwanda area. Requirements include side-on garages, recessed garages, exterior siding, and specific architectural styles. Design Parameters: The project site is located within the "Upper Etiwanda" neighborhood that has its own unique architectural design guidelines per the ENSP. The ENSP requires that a mix of the following • primary architectural styles be used for at least two-thirds of the units: Bungalow. Ranch, Monterey, or San Juan. Up to one-third of the units may use these styles: Country, Victorian, or Santa Barbara Revival. The proposed modifications are consistent with the required architectural styles and include an increase in the square footage of the Plan 2 Floor Plans from 2,737 to 3,364, add a 330 square foot loggia option to the Plan 1 Floor Plan and add Floor Plan 5 which will be the largest Floor Plan of 3,727 square feet to the mix. The new range of Floor Plans will be from a 2,605 square foot plan to a 3,727 square foot plan. These new plans provide more living space to meet the demand of the current housing market. The new Ian 5 Floor Plan will replace 9 of the existing Plan 2 Floor Plans. The remaining 7 Plan 2 Floor Plans ill be constructed with the increased square footage Floor Plan, A total of 26 (33 percent) of the house product will remain single-story. The new plan will be a two-story plan and have four architectural styles. EXHIBIT E E-30 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2011-00671 — K. HOVNANIAN — RANCHO 79 • October 4, 2011 Page 2 The proposed architectural styles are San Juan, Santa Barbara Revival, Country, and Ranch to be consistent with the product that was previously approved. The San Juan elevation incorporates wrought iron details, recessed windows, decorative shutters, and an arched patio/entryway. The Santa Barbara Revival incorporates built-up eaves, louvered shutters, and recessed windows. The Country style incorporates brick veneer elements, flat tile roof, and balconies. The Ranch style incorporates louvered shutters, recessed windows, and stone veneer. All four sides of all the homes have articulation and incorporate decorative garage doors to match the architectural style of the home. Each of the four plans feature covered porch entries which range in size dependent upon the style. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. • Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The applicant has worked diligently with staff. Together with the Development Agreement and discussions with staff, there are no major issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: • 1. The garage on Plan 5 shall not be labeled as a 4-car garage as it does not meet the minimum interior areas of 10 feet by 20 feet for each parking space as the Development Code requires. 2. The ro osed design of the houses does not meet the design regulations under RCMC P P 9 17.08.090.D2a (i.e. 360 degree architecture to all elevations). The front elevations include some elements that either disappear or are sparse on the sides and rear elevations. Materials, such as siding, stone veneer, wrought iron, and use of faux shutters should be utilized on all elevations and in greater amounts to achieve 360 degree architecture. Long wall planes of stucco do not achieve this requirement and should be avoided. Architectural elements should be added to create visual interest, yet be authentic to the stated architectural theme. The applicant has added some elements to the housing product but still requires more elements on the walls with long areas of stucco and requires some of the front elevations to be embellished. Policy issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be. incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Boulders from the project site shall be utilized and integrated as part of the front yard Landscape Plan, per the Master Plan Resolution of Approval. 2. Driveways shall be colored and scored in a diagonal pattern for additional entryway detail. 3. Coach lights on the rear will match the coach lights utilized on the front of the residence. • E-31 DRC ACTION AGENDA •DRC2011-00671 — K. HOVNANIAN — RANCHO 79 October 4, 2011 Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee review the proposed project and provide additional feedback and input as necessary. Staff further recommends that the applicant work with staff and revise the elevations to meet the 360 degree architectural requirement that meets the City's architectural expectations. Following review of the revisions by staff, the project will be scheduled for review and consideration by the Design Review Committee. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee members reviewed the project and requested that the applicant enhance and move architectural elements found on the elevations of Plans 2 and 5 to adhere to the 360 degree architectural requirement. The changes to the elevations were minor; so, the Committee agreed to recommend that the project move onto the Planning Commission after the corrections have been made. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Steve Fowler • • • • • • • E-32 RESOLUTION NO. 11-60 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00671, A REQUEST TO ADD A 5TH FLOOR PLAN, REPLOT 9 PARCELS, ADD A LOGGIA OPTION TO THE PLAN 1 FLOOR PLAN AND MAKE REVISIONS TO THE PLAN 2 FLOOR PLAN OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00259 FOR 79 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 34.1 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD,WEST OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CORRIDOR IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1087-101-01 THROUGH 55; 1087-111-01 THROUGH 02, 1087-111-14 THROUGH 1087-111-19, 21, AND 1087-111-27 THROUGH 36. A. Recitals. 1. K. Hovananian filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2011-00671, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of November 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a public hearing on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on November 9, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located north of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue, south of the North Etiwanda Preserve and east of the Southern California. Edison Corridor, and is presently improved with rough grading and curb, gutter and utilities: and ' b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant land of the North Etiwanda Preserve, the property to the south consists of single-family residential, the property to the east is single-family residential, and the property to the west is a 240-foot wide Southern California Edison (SCE) utility corridor; and c. The project consists of a Development Review of 79 lots, with this application replotting 9 of those lots and changing the number two plan elevations and adding an optional • loggia to the single-story plan; and d. The sewer, storm drain, detention basin, curb and gutter improvements are installed; and • E-33 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-60 DRC2011-00671 — K. HOVNANIAN November 9, 2011 Page 2 e. The project conforms to the basic Development Standards of the Etiwanda North • Specific Plan with required architectural elevations, slope requirements, and overall project density. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan by providing a variety of housing units that are compatible with the surrounding area; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located by adhering to all setback, height, and density regulations that govern the area where these homes are being constructed; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, in that single-family residences are an approved use within the Low Residential Zoned District; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all the written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning • Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified an Environmental Impact Report in June 1991, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in October 1999, and an Initial Study Addendum was certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in connection with the approval of Tentative Tract Map 16227. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed the indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or(iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Development Review application, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred that would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified EIR. The proposed Development Review contemplates revising the elevations and options on about a third of the remaining homes to be constructed of the 79 single-family homes previously approved, which was evaluated and within the scope of the prior EIR, SEIR and Initial • Study Addendum. The proposed development does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report for the tract map. Staff further finds that E-34 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-60 DRC2011-00671 — K. HOVNANIAN November 9, 2011 Page 3 • the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. The proposed Development Review application does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report for the tract map. c. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Development Review DRC2011-00671. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, ' this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the addition of a 5th floor plan, replotting of 9 parcels, adding a loggia option to the Plan 1 floor plan and making revisions to the Plan 2 floor plan. 2) The applicant shall still adhere to all the conditions of the previous approvals Development Review DRC2010-00259 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226. • 3) All driveways shall have a maximum grade of 10 percent. If necessary, driveways shall be lengthened and the garage setbacks increased in order to achieve a 10 percent grade. 4) Boulders from the project site shall be utilized and integrated as part of the front yard landscape plan, per the Master Plan Resolution of Approval. 5) The driveways shall be scored in a horizontal pattern for additional entryway detail. Building Department 1) Construction of the home must be in accordance with the approved.. . Fire protection Plan; this tract is located in the VHFHSZ. Engineering Department 1) Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract SUBTT16226 apply. 2) Pay a $2,635 Traffic Circulation Improvement Fee prior to Building Permit issuance for each residence, per developer-to-developer • reimbursement agreement SRA-41. Note that a fee has already been • collected for Lot 20. • 3) Install street trees per Drawing 2021, Sheet 2, Revision 6. E-35 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-60 • DRC2011-00671 — K. HOVNANIAN November 9, 2011 Page 4 a) Add a note to the private landscape plans starting "street trees • shall be installed per the public improvement plans." 4) If any drive approaches will be relocated, or curb cores added, process a revision to Drawing 2021. Environmental Mitigation 1) The project shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures identified in the Envirohmental Impact Report that was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June 1991, the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report that was certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in October 1999, and the Initial Study Addendum that was certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in August 2001. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: • Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of November 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: . • . • NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • E-36 trt S ` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ZS! DEPARTMENT • STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2011-00671 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF 79 LOTS APPLICANT: K. HOVNANIAN HOMES LOCATION: NORTH OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • Completion Date General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / /_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 11-60, Standard /_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X • B. Time Limits 1. Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved /_/_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. • SC-12-08 1 E-37 Project No. DRC2011-00671 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ • site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, and the Master Plan. 2. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 3. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be /_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all /_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be /_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 7. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ • including proper illumination. 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property /_/_ owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 10. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall _/ /_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project • perimeter: 11. Construct block walls between homes(i.e.,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 12. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood /_/_ gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 13. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. / /_ 14. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to _/_/_ maintain an open feeling and enhance views. • 2 E-38 Project No. DRC2011-00671 Completion Date 15. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The _/_/_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the • required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. _/_/_ E. Landscaping • 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/ /_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater _/ /_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq.ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks • in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously _/ /_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development _/_/_ Code and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls, landscaping,and sidewalks shall be included in / /_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. - . 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the /_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. F. Other Agencies • 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location / /_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the • overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 3 E-39 Project No. DRC2011-00671 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements • 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/_/_ a. . Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; • d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(DRC2011-00671)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to /_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. • 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / /_ 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department. H. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number(DRC2011-00671). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes,ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant _!_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map / /_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. • 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday / /_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. • • 4 E 40 Project No. DRC2011-00671 • Completion Date I. New Structures • 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances /_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. / /_ J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/ /_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/ /_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/ /_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. PLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION CANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • • 5 E41 • a ° M04„ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection � C .,� efiZ District FIRE Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS June 29, 2011 K Hovnanian • Rancho 79 Tract 16226-1 DRC2011-00671 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply The design for Fire Hydrant spacing and location shall comply with the RCFPD Standard 5-10 and CVWD's current standard. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is determined in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix B, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. • 2. Public Water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits for the construction of the homes will not be issued until the public water plans are approved by FCS and CVWD. 3. On the site plans to be submitted for plan check, show all fire hydrants available to the proposed site. FSC-3 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems To be installed in lots as outlined in the approved letter from Firewise date December 21, 2010. Lots 7, 20-23, 30-41 and 93-97 quire AFS. FSC-4 Fire District Site Access Existing and compliant, to be maintained. FSC-5 Hazardous Fire Area This project is located within the "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside District", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as High Probability-Hiqh Consequence for Fire Risk. These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District. The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • FCS-6 Fire Protection Plans: The applicant shall prepare the architectural plans for the construction of the buildings in accordance with the approved fire protection plan for the community, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50, the 2010 California Building Code chapter 7A and RCFPD Standard 49-1. E-42 • FCS-7 Mobile, stationary or portable power-operated equipment in the Hazardous Fire Area shall not be used without the Fire Safety Division's written approval. Specific fire protection measures that may be required to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to: a. A stand-by water-tender, equipped with a pump, fire hose and nozzle. • b. Pre-wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks. • c. Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day. d. For welding, cutting or grinding work, clear away all combustible material from the area around such operation for a minimum distance of 10-feet. A "hot-work" permit must be obtained from Fire Construction Services prior to cutting, welding or grinding work. e. Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one five (5) gallon backpack water pump-type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation. FCS-8 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, Fire Protection Plan requirements shall be installed, inspected and accepted by the Fire District staff. Schedule the inspection with Fire Construction Services at 909-477-2713. FCS-10 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that regulate parking, specify the • method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. FCS-11 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be noncombustible internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness with non combustible fixtures. The numbers shall be visible from the street. FCS-12 Landscaping: The lots must landscaped with the required vegetation in accordance with approved landscape plans. • • • E43 2 STAFF REPORT ' k • PLANNING DEPARTMENT [Aso DATE: November 9, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: • James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00560 - AMERICAN TIRE DEPOT - BEDROS DARKJIAN - A request to construct a 7,885 square foot tire sales and service building on a 1.38 acre parcel within the Victoria Commons Retail Center within the General Commercial District at 11951 Foothill Boulevard — APN: 0229-023-01. On January 24, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Multi-Tenant Commercial Center; Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 4), Community Commercial • South - Vacant Lot; Industrial Park (Subarea 7) East - Nursery and Southern California Edison Utility Corridor; Open Space West - Masi Plaza; Industrial Park (Subarea 7) B. General Plan Designations: • Project Site - General Commercial North - General Commercial South - General Commercial East - Flood control and Utility Corridor West - General Commercial C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a puzzle-piece shaped parcel that is part of an overall project that is L-shaped. The puzzle piece shaped parcel is a 1.38 acre pad near the west portion of the Victoria Commons site at 11951 Foothill Boulevard. This site is on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Rochester Avenue and the Edison Utility Corridor in the General Commercial District. Currently, the Victoria Commons Project has one multi-tenant retail building, a retail bank building, and a drive-thru fast food restaurant under construction with an additional vacant pad located along Foothill Boulevard. There is a also a two-story office building along Rochester Avenue. At the south east corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue is the Aggazzotti home, formerly a winery and designated Historic Point of Interest (not a part of the project). E. Parking Calculations: The project is parked per the parking criteria of the Development Code and the tabulation of the required parking spaces is as follows: • Item F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00560—AMERICAN TIRE DEPOT • November 9, 2011 • Page 2 • Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Footage Bays Required Provided Retail Tire Center 3 spaces 8 19 40 plus two spaces for each bay As illustrated above, the project site has allotted ample parking for the use. The retail tire center requires 19 parking spaces and 40 have been provided. ANALYSIS: A. General: The master planned project, marketed as Victoria Commons, was originally approved through Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-01084, with a mix of office, retail, and restaurants that creates a synergy consistent with the commercial/office corridor land use goal of Foothill Boulevard. The Victoria Commons originally proposed five retail/restaurant and bank buildings fronting along Foothill Boulevard; the American Tire Depot building will occupy one of the five pad sites. There is one main entrance off Rochester Avenue for the professional office building (Building F), and two ingress/egress accesses are provided off Foothill Boulevard: the first just east of the Aggazzotti residence, and the second at the eastern property line. The eastern Foothill Boulevard access lines up with the signalized median break that was approved for the northerly commercial project DRC2005-00365. • This project proposes a 7,885 square foot retail tire center with 8 service bays inside the building. The proposed building is a single-story structure with a contemporary commercial architectural style incorporating winery-inspired accent elements. Some of the features include a 41 foot tower at the northeast corner of the building to identify the entrance to the building. There are several pop out features that project from the wall plane between 2 to 3 feet and above the building approximately 4 feet. The exterior of the building is proposed to use a mixture of earth tone colored stucco and stone veneer to make up a majority of the material on the building. Stone veneer is utilized on the columns of the three of the tower elements that appear on all four elevations. The large tower at the northeast corner of the building has perforated metal window coverings on the upper portion of the tower with wood corbels and a Mission style tile roof. Metal awnings are located above all the tinted temper glass windows and stucco columns with 1-inch grooves about every 2 and a 1/2 feet to give the building visual interest and a commercial retail store style to allow for reuse of the building if needed at a later time. The tempered glass at the entrance will be clear to allow for clear view into the waiting area and cashier but the other remaining' windows on the building are tinted tempered glass in order to block views into the 8-bay repair area. The roof mounted equipment will be screened by the parapet walls. The • building utilizes materials from the existing buildings to incorporate it into the center but not duplicate the style. The proposed landscape around the building will compliment the existing site landscaping. The signage locations have been indicated on the plans to allow for the review of future • F-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2011-00560 —AMERICAN TIRE DEPOT November 9, 2011 • Page 3 placement as it corresponds with the building. The signage will be submitted under a sign permit package at a later date. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Granger) reviewed the site, building elevations, materials, and Conceptual Landscaping Plans on October 11, 2011, and the Committee recommended approval of the project. C. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading and Technical Committees reviewed the development portion of the project on October 11, 2011, and recommended approval. • D. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration in January 24, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or • different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated Development Review application DRC2010-01006 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The original submittal considered impacts associated with a retail center and the current proposal is for a retail use. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of the Development Review Application DRC2011-00560. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2011-00560 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, • 9rW1-444-1 James R. Troyer, AICP0 Planning Director • JRT:SF/Is F-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00560 —AMERICAN TIRE DEPOT November 9, 2011 Page 4 • Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Plan Exhibit B - Floor Plan Exhibit C - Elevations Exhibit D - Design Review Committee Action Comments Dated October 4, 2011 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2011-00560 • • • F-4 0 • • • • V ____.—cc__ - ?---:— 1 relat t? o i'' J `_j VIII g _. A 'li��i' ���� F I // 1 I•AA NIL) V�.AI111 1►1�A I11 .a* V \ tea\ a\ � f r —4,— .... ..-- I :■'''‘.,`•` •‘`..t•1 `I`I\I lyl?I�I la \� \\ I '� tt♦ ♦•fir bill C _ O E LJJ EXHIBIT A • D r , i I lR r AMERICAN TIRE DEPOT DARKJIAN ASSOCIATES +° IM MR ARA TCHAGIAgN1 SITE PLAN 9�11iW119LL 19.v. I A 11961 FOOTHILL BLVD. PASADB6: )4CA911P/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA T mm406C556 5 ®l ( nr,• f u . n . • _1 M -a, AN ' a Ill 9 \ ' Li It 14 4 n.r 74. - p ® ! ! d . it)C 4 • p 8 • LPN I'1 III ICI r 1 a lit (6) Ill I li A k I _l. 5 R q .-_-_- -_-k® wr• r nrr 3 0 J ,' 5,J' " aa'w'I p; Y �i °� igaaa , ;�@ el� � � �€ i E®omo - p �� �� 1 iiiisr 1 t w 44 0 e a r III slim i 1$111 ° Id X11 . DARKJIAN ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT 6 FLOOR PLAN annamwU ELL. PAhlF fl TEL:0204 64:651 F6 999,9,4500 la/ VONOYlYOOOOHONYU r it AIRY)YN30YSYd OAIB 1111/1004/B81 L 'AM TW100111x NOIlYA313 1SV3 V H1HON NpBY1fT'IYO1 rnY HN not rl I SJIVIOOSSV NVINEIVO lodaa 3E111 NVOIH2INV ; d I I r i Q • I $ € I • fA 11,'..1V.,IMiNiI 011; !! p! IF,llu I11 ' lIllll 01111 J r' N.11 1 l i 4 IE∎11Ei a Illu+l �It. la rl 11i1 x1111 1 Iad111ilr rl16s471 ssP..l R PtI 1I u I ,I Y�111 11 In l r`1 t t11,.11 lag 1121 IIIPi M'19kIgI:W11191) �� nnalrN lat 1 , I IN*a tl Y.r.rYnu, I _ ::::�' •s:aslro '��h41,1s'e b°d1+iYi�li. is 1I�' 1'jI�i�n,I� I mI�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII■III ILSILYi ,i. II am iiii• 4 IF—"*g 1:: ,• O .r.. ® :a .c,w .. I'111141 9! AN' I I.G -S`?Ii. 11111 111I vni.,91 rlal I16'll1 w = - Ilr II6 .I1 s 1 J.1fl:; 1r-41W IIMMENNIII e �I.I ' S Nei A an j =I I �Inl,.„1 _I e u a i C. !_i��1ItA ii oiq ly11'tt"Ctlxl,N1.4l w�ice' VIII .4. �� 111 L �R} I IJ�Ii°jltlfl'lil3#'IM_al AEI- I�p"Ililil611i11d 111�M o'„ ' 2 z7 O rlllyln�ula^ — _ I w; �i11%!1Idsll > �_ 1 a ill© 14 lfil�llgjll� 11�1�II I W ® kill' 'I i c w , I (161 1 �h��la I IIIi'S� � o 11 rag 4' lu Tj 141 yS r�^I p O �Id llll�,■■■■■IL' Q P Y am il_. I1�1111111 ula rule � �1 Z (111%111111tHrT�A Y11��3�tIt1�1 I�' Wlrn 7' 'n y144 � w s m W laa,n. r.�e.nean . -.II+ • EXHIBI ■ _/ F-7 • 9o5<epS rat vONOVIVOn3 OHONW '^ DMleVOVNaCVSSJ OAlB 11IH1OOd L9GLI 1I ) , iK lfH1011IL1¢ NOIlVA3131S3M V HMOS NrIS/19YH�1 wv vw BOd cl I S3IVIOOSSV NVInIdVQ 1Od30 3411 NVOId3WV i NI I r i Q 1 e s • 1• -ll ail i 3I i' PI� A Ib i ;111 • V - - - • n J n e _ __ .L 411-S , . . I •b <,1 1, — ryaft lfii'11PIII.��" I I IIR ,: k13� �MIR f 1 _ I,I� I V; -I i¶ 111 1 III A A { a��Pltl 1r A:1 III IIII',I1hri I II'�i MNIII n!uNIWIIIV!EI _ 1,101, I _ 111,11 NEBI Y1 • j III 11 III141 II Ill'II'I l IIFIII'II I4iahk hlrallll{III IIIII IIi Illil 1 61111141 Al r 1 .•, MO' Ffi 1• I� , M u . •; %N iI n L li If 19 — IllErVil O MitdirMEMINN8 I 0. e ® e • a I .IIr17 i■i s._. ! a Ii z° I A N Z n ® olx Ipl �_ °I low I <IS XI . =I QI il JI— ; III IIN L ,, IIIaIoII�IdN'N��Illp'I�rIIIAINUNII■ tJ) I— r: IIII Iw n u r tto FFFFFmo11l1{ �u• e I' IAl 1 Ilp i VIII C ° �: ISat ✓j1 dam) Ja[ • 1-8 • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:30 p.m. Steve Fowler October 4, 2011 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00560 - AMERICAN TIRE DEPOT - BEDROS DARKJIAN - A request to construct a 7,885 square foot tire sales and service building on a 1.37-acre pad within the Victoria Commons Retail Center within the General Commercial District, located at 11951 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0229-023-01. On January 24, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing to construct a 7,885 square foot commercial auto repair building that predominately deals with the retail sales and installation of auto and light truck tires on a 1.38-acre parcel, located at 11951 Foothill Boulevard. This site is on the south side of Foothill Boulevard in the Commercial General District. The design of the site was previously approved under DRC2005-01084. The 1.38-acre parcel is a vacant pad towards the west end of the previously approved project that sits approximately 3 feet below street level. The proposed building is a single-story structure with a contemporary commercial architecture inspired style. One design feature is a 41-foot tower at the northeast corner of the building • to identify the entrance to the building. There are several pop-out features that extend away from the wall between 2 to 3 feet and approximately 4 feet above the building. The exterior of the building is proposed to use a mixture of earth tone colored stucco and stone veneer to make up a majority of the material used on the building. The stone veneer is utilized on the columns of the tower elements. The large tower at the northeast corner of the building has perforated metal window coverings on the upper portion of the tower with wood corbels and a Mission style tile roof. Metal awnings are located above all the tinted temper glass windows and stuccoed columns with 1 inch grooves about every 2-1/2 feet to give the building visual interest and a commercial retail store style to allow for reuse of the building if needed at a later time. The tempered glass at the entrance will be clear to allow for clear view into the waiting area and cashier, but the remaining windows around the rest of the building are tinted tempered glass so that the eight-bay repair area is not subject to public view. The roof-mounted equipment will be screened by the parapet walls. The building utilizes materials from the existing buildings to incorporate it into the center but not duplicate the style. The proposed landscape around the building will compliment the existing site landscaping. The signage locations have been indicated on the plans to allow for the review of future placement as it corresponds with the building. The signage will be submitted under a sign permit package at a later date. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for the Committee discussion regarding this project. Maior Issues: The applicant worked hard with staff to follow the criteria outlined in the Development Code. There are no major issues regarding this project at this time. • EXHIBIT D F-9 • DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2011-00560 — BEDROS DARKJIAN • October 4, 2011 Page 2 Minor Issues: No Minor issues at this time. Policy Issues: No policy issues at this time. Staff recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of this Development Review to the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: The project was approved as presented. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner Steve Fowler • • • F-10 RESOLUTION NO.11-61 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. DRC2011-00560, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 7,885 SQUARE FOOT TIRE SALES AND SERVICE BUILDING, LOCATED AT 11951 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0229-023-01. A. Recitals. 1. Bedros Darkjian on behalf of American Tire Depot filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. DRC2011-00560, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of November 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning • Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on November 9, 2011, including written and oral staff reports,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 11951 Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of 187 feet and lot depth of 258 feet and is presently improved with a parking lot and lighting; and b. The property to the north of the subject site across Foothill Boulevard is Victoria Promenade, the property to the south consists of a vacant lot, the property to the east is a nursery within the Edison Power Line Corridor, and the property to the west across Rochester Avenue is Masi Plaza; and c. The project, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and d. The project incorporates a blend of architectural design and site planning that gives character with compatibility through the use of like building materials and plant palette. • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: F-11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-61 DRC2011-00560 —AMERICAN TIRE DEPOT November 9, 2011 Page 2 • a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan because it provides another use within the commercial center that creates a wide range of community- oriented and regionally oriented businesses; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located because the project is compatible with the existing center through use of compatible building materials and design; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code because the project complies with established designed standards of the Development Code such as setback, landscaping, and parking requirements; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity because the project has been designed with the complete center in mind and will complement the rest of the center with complementary building materials. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local • CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration in January 24, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or(iv)additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Development Review application DRC2011-00560, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The original submittal considered impacts associated with a retail center and the current proposal is for that type of use. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. c. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to • CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Design Review application DRC2011- 00560. • • F-12 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-61 DRC2011-00560—AMERICAN TIRE DEPOT November 9, 2011 Page 3 • . 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department • 1) Approval is for the construction of a 7,885 square foot retail tire center within an existing retail center located at 11951 Foothill Boulevard APN: 0229-023-01. 2) No exterior changes to the design of the project, including exterior materials, shall be permitted without prior City review and approval. 3) All applicable conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM17818 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-01084 shall apply. 4) All repair activities shall be conducted within the enclosed building. 5) Exterior storage of tires or auto parts is not permitted. 6) Inoperative vehicles shall not be stored within the parking lot of the • center, only inside the building. 7) Service area flooring shall have a rough texture (such as brushed concrete) to minimize tire squeal. • 8) The quietest available air compressor and pneumatic wrenches shall be selected for use at this location and the air compressor shall be located within the building to minimize operational noise. 9) Hours of operation are from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. 10) Any stone veneers used on the project(e.g., buildings, perimeter walls, pilasters, etc.), shall be installed in a manner that does not give the appearance of a tack on element. All stone veneers shall be applied and/or extended so that the material terminates at an appropriate point • on the structure. Engineering Department 1) Process Certificate of Compliance No. 686 for Lot Line Adjustment for approval and recordation prior to issuance of building permit. 2) Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees •shall be paid for the Construction and • Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at' least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided F-13 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-61 DRC2011-00560 —AMERICAN TIRE DEPOT November 9, 2011 Page 4 to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division • when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 3) The following impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of building permit, in conformance with the CFD 2003-01 financing agreement. Fees are subject to change annually. • a) Transportation Fees, excluding $ 6,976.00 per 1,000 s.f. Backbone and EV Preemption Less 70.7% b) General City Drainage Fees Exempt 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: •Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of November 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS • F-14 • "``"`'` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT x �'"= DEPARTMENT yytD :, :e". . -r.a STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2011-00560 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: BEDROS DARKJIAN LOCATION: 11951 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 11-61, Standard /_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 _X_ B. Time Limits 1. Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved _/_/_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. • SC-12-08 1 I:IPLANNINGIFINALIPLNGCOMMI2011 Res & Stf Rptldre2011-00560 Stand Conds 11-9.doc F-15 • Project No.DRC2011-00560 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / /_ • site plans, architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / /_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for /_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so • as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, /_/_ including proper illumination. 10. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. D. Shopping Centers 1. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the /_/_ Planning Director: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of(the shopping center/the project). / /_ b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to / /_ include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. _/ / d. Roll-up doors. —/ /— • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\dre2011-00560 Stand Conds 11-9.doc 2 F-16 Project No.DRC2011-00560 • Completion Date • e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. —/ / f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. —/—/— • g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed _/_/_ to be hidden from view. • 2. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. —/—/- 3. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and _/_/_ debris remain for more than 24 hours. 4. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: • a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an /_/_ exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading-No person shall cause the loading, unloading,opening,closing,or / /_ other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 5. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza /_/_ area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_l_ projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent • properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork,.that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. • 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall /_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more / /_ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. LANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\dre2011-00560 Stand Conds 11-9.doc 3 F-17 Project No.DRC2011-00560 Completion Date G. Landscaping 1. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ • commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 2. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls. 3. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building. H. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. _/_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. • APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: / /_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; • d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2011-00560) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. /_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to /_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / /_ 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department. • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\dre2011-00560 Stand Conds 11-9.doc • 4 • F-18 Project No.DRC2011-00560 Completion Date J. Site Development • 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_I_ marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2011-00560). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or _/_/_ major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map /_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday /_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter). K. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances /_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. / /_ • 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. / /_ 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas. —/ / 5. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC)for accessibility to public buildings. _/_/_ 6. Provide compliance with the California building Code (CBC) for California Building Energy Efficiency Standards. 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. / /_ 8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. _/ /_ 9. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. _/_/_ L. Grading, 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to /_/_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / /_ time of application for grading plan check. • :\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\dre2011-00560 Stand Conds 11-9.doc 5 F-19 Project No.DRC2011-00560 Completion Date 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/ /_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ • existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT(GRADING SECTION), (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS: APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,with / /_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / /_ N. Windows 1. Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. / /_ 2. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede / /_ • entry to burglars. O. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall.be reflective for nighttime / /_ visibility. P. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and _/_/_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941-1488. /_/_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\dre2011-00560 Stand Conds 11-9.doc • 6 F-20 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2011-00560 Building & Safety Department et. 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 • M T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 GRADING COMMITTEE PROJECT REPORT& RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: DRC2011-00560 Type: Automotive Tire Store Location: 11951 Foothill Boulevard Planning Department: STEVEN FOWLER APN: Meeting Date: October 4, 2011 By: Matthew Addington )/� Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx No: If NO, see COMMENTS below: • PRELIMINARY: GRC: October 4, 2011 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: PC Meeting: By: Note: Building and Safety—Grading will review and comment on future submittals for this project. A) STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. • 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations • . per said report. 3) A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. • 6) The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. • I:IBUILDING'PERMITS\DRC2011-00560 American Tire1DRC2011.005460 Grading Committee Project Report,20111004.doc . 1 of 5 F-21 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2011-00560 Building & Safety Department Sr 10500 Civic Center Dr. . Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • S so T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8) A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not ' exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 12) The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in • conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 15) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 16) The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 17) Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 18) The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. I:IBUILDINGIPERMITS\DRC2011-00560 American Tire1DRC2011-005460 Grading Committee Project Report,20111004.doc • 2of5 . F-22 °> City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2011-00560 ( ' Building & Safety Department S 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • T: (909)477.2710 F: (909)477-2711 19) The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 20) This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 21) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit°. 22) Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; • b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading • operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 23) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. B) COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above • I:IBUILDINGIPERMITSIDRC2011-00560 American TIre10RC2011-005460 Grading Committee Project Report,20111004.doc 3of5 • F-23 • City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2011-00560 • Building Safety Department 10500 Civic Center r Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: 1) Please note that at this conceptual level a review of the accessibility access is not performed. It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. 2) The grading of the project shall conform to the current adopted California Building Code. C) SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) If more than 5,000 square feet of combined asphalt concrete and PCC parking and driveway surface area are removed, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) will be required for this project. Contact the Building and Safety Department for additional direction/information. 2) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 3) D) WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN • 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 2) The Water Quality Management Plan prepared by an unknown entity dated July 28, 2011 has been reviewed and deemed "Incomplete" dated August 23, 2011. The following corrections are required prior to the final approval of the WQMP: Page Section ,Item Cover The engineer of record must wet sign and seal the document Cover The preparer of the document must be shown on the cover page. A-3 1.3 • Please explain the expression "An owner will be formed . . ." • Section.VI could not be found. Please add tabs to allow for easier referencing in the document. • A sentence reads "There is no . . . auto repair or . . .". Yet this is checked as a Category 4 Project for auto repair. Please clarify. A-6 2.2 In the table item 1.A and 1.b is not correct. Item 1.A should be marked "yes" and item 1.B should be marked "no" for this area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1:1BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2011-00560 American Tire1DRC2011-005460 Grading Committee Project Report,20111004.doc • 4of5 F24 • City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2011-00560 isseAs. Building & Safety Department Civic ene • Rancho 10500 CucaCmongat r Dr.,CA 91730 % T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 Page Section Item A-9 3.1.1 The first response has a rogue "X". Is this a yes or no response? A sentence reads "to drain off size". Please explain. A-11 3.1.1 Please provide a detail for a "grave filtration trench". A-12 3.2.1 • Please show the roof top drains on the WQMP BMP exhibit. • Please explain the expression "Where not adjacent to sidewalk is separated from curb". A-19 3.3 Please complete Table 3-3 and indicate which BMP('s) are proposed. A-20 . 3.4.1 Please provide project specific calculations for your result of 0.057 cfs. A-21 . 4.1 For the underground infiltration trenches please add a note similar to the following: All underground chambers shall be inspected by the owner on a biennial basis with a report given to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The owner shall pay for all costs associated with the inspection and report preparation." 6 Please use the Certification with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan A copy of the agreement may be picked up at the Building and Safety front counter and filled in by hand. Please do not retype the agreement as this causes typographical errors. A-1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not use Attachment A-1. • A-2 Please remove this attachment. The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not use Attachment A-2. Please remove this attachment. Please provide a full size (24" x 36") WQMP BMP exhibit within the document. Attachment Please provide project specific calculations. • D • • 1:\BUILDINGIPERMITSIDRC2011-00560 American Tire\DRC2011-005460 Grading Committee Project Report,20111004.doc 5 of 5 F-25 • ay Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District FIRE Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS June 1, 2011 American Tire Depot 11951 Foothill Blvd DRC2011-00560 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building & Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web cityofrc.us FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply c. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10 FSC-2 Fire Flow • 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in .accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 3. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 4. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 5. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to • submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the2007 California Fire • Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. F-26 FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The 2010California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard 9-3, Ordinance FD46 • and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system fire may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard 5-1. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 151 story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each de. T • g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the • 2 F-27 installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. • c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. .Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 6. Roof Access: must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 5-6. There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the • roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan, check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of • the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. 3 F-28 • • Flammable & Combustible Liquids • Repair Garages • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • LPG • • High Pile Storage • Miscellaneous Combustible Storage • FSC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2010 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD50and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method"form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1. RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement— Please provide a permanent access agreement between • the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to • gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant — Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. • Chronological Summary . of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required • prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site 4 F-29 combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. • All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction • Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". • On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of.final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. • • 5 F30 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by • Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must, obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 1/" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • . • 6 F31 STAFF REPORT .1 y • PLANNING DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: November 9, 2011 CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner Subject: DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE STATUS REPORT AND REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES BACKGROUND: The Planning Department is continuing to review the administrative draft of the Development Code, making changes and seeking input from various departments across the City including Building and Safety, Code Enforcement, Engineering Services, Fire and the Redevelopment Agency to ensure that all aspects of development are considered in the new Code. Staff will complete their review on November 17, 2011, at which time PMC will begin drafting the Public Draft Development Code for public review in January. • On October 5, and on November 2, 2011, staff presented the first and second of three planned reports to the City Council to give a preview of the changes that are coming to the Development Code ahead of the Public Draft. In this report, staff has highlighted some key changes that are proposed to streamline and modernize the Code as it relates to land uses. KEY CHANGES: In the current Code, land uses are located across multiple sections of the document, which takes more time to research and creates unneeded confusion. For example, today, if an applicant wanted to know where a prospective doctor's office could locate within the City, staff would have to look in 4 different chapters of the Code to get this information. In addition, each chapter today defines land uses in different terms; in one chapter it is called 'medical health service', in another chapter it is called 'medical/dental office'. With the new Code, all land uses are grouped together into one Article of the Code. All uses will be listed in the new land use classification system, which is designed to group land use categories on the basis of a common function, product or compatibility characteristics. Land use descriptions have been updated to reflect more modern uses with thorough definitions for each land use to reduce interpretation and confusion. In addition, the new Code consolidates our existing non- conforming use regulations into one section, providing easier access and better understanding of these uses. The new Code will modernize standards for temporary uses (i.e., parking lot or sidewalk sales) to allow businesses additional days for these types of uses. This will provide more flexibility for businesses to generate sales based on their business needs. • • Item G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE STATUS REPORT AND REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES November 9, 2011 • Page 2 Included in the new Code is a section on specially regulated uses. This chapter provides specific requirements for uses that have the potential to create an adverse impact on the City. Examples of these uses are check cashing businesses, pawnshops, tattoo parlors, smoke shops, and thrift stores. For some of these uses, the new Code requires a minimum distance between like uses (i.e., 1000 feet between individual pawnshops) and a minimum distance between other specific uses (i.e., check cashing businesses must be 500 feet from a liquor store). This section also provides specific development requirements for some of these uses. For example, for thrift stores, the new code requires a separate, distinct collection area and enhanced site maintenance to prevent the "dumping" of donations. With the new Code, all of our site development provisions are grouped together in one article. This will simplify the often frustrating process of finding detailed development provisions sprinkled throughout the code. Included are chapters dedicated to fences, lighting, and storage, among others. Also included is a consolidated chapter dedicated to non-conforming uses, providing easier access and clear development standards for these uses. CONCLUSION: The changes proposed in the new Development Code are designed to make the Code easy to use for staff, businesses and residents. The proposed changes to the land uses will make it easier to do business in Rancho Cucamonga, providing a clear understanding of our commitment to creating a quality community. The final report will discuss changes to signs and the introduction of a green • building code that will provide flexibility and give us a competitive advantage in the Inland Empire for future economic growth. Rest cffully Submitt IL Jam-- R. Troyer, AICP Plan ing Director JRT/JN/Is • • G-2 Planning Commission Meeting of November 9, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-IN SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding. Thank you. NAME ADDRESS CITY ITEM 1. `paAnd,- 31-4-1/0 i5 Sp€ ktu-k.. o14-41/21re.- G.a f brr-A /1A c 2 &&koc- .DArks ant r¢ssoc, . -Prr9 F 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27.