Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011/12/14 - Agenda Packet 4.. • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Iktir PLANNING COMMISSION Liy AGENDA ANCHO CUCAMONGA DECEMBER 14, 2011 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California II. CALL TO ORDER I Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Munoz_ Vice Chairman Howdyshell • Fletcher_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca — I : IL . APPROVAL OF MINUTES I Adjourned Special Meeting Minutes dated November 2, 2011 Regular Meeting Minutes dated November 9, 2011 IIII. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. VACATION V-218– ETCO HOMES INC. –A request to vacate vehicular access rights for one driveway on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of Vintage Drive along Lot 11 of Tract Map 16867- APN 225-611-39 Related File: DRC2011-00032. • 1 of 6 tip PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA • LS DECEMBER 14, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01012 - AT&T MOBILITY - A request to replace 6 antennas with 12 antennas and related equipment on an existing 70 - foot high (top of antennas at 65 feet) monopine wireless communication facility(originally approved as Minor Development Review DRC2002-00417) located within the Red Hill Community Park at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue at 7484 Vineyard Avenue - APN: 0207-031-33. Staff has determined that this project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption - Existing Facilities). C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00612-CORE DEVELOPMENT • SERVICES FOR METRO PCS -A request to collocate a Major Wireless Facility consisting of a set of antenna panels, a microwave dish, and a 12 foot x 18 foot equipment enclosure with an existing Major Wireless Communications facility mounted on a 78.5-foot high baseball field light pole in the Open Space (OS) District generally located at the southeast corner of Heritage Community Park; APN: 1061-641-07. Related files: Minor Development Reviews DRC2002-00262 and DRC2004-00325 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01142. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303- New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(NON-CONSTRUCTION) DRC2011-00990 - BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS - A request to modify Conditional Use Permits DRC2007-00258 and DRC2007-00258U to increase the hours of operation Monday through Wednesday and on Sundays and add additional arcade games for a sit-down restaurant located at 12375 Base Line Road, Suite 101, in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Planned Community at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard-APN: 227-161-58. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the permitting of existing structures. CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 9, 2011. • 2 of 6 r. tilia PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Ltstiv DECEMBER 14, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00255 - ALL STATE PAPER AND METAL RECYCLING - JAMES LIN - A request to make site improvements including constructing new screen walls, installing all street improvements and landscaping, complete on-site paving and add employee eating area and parking for a 4.42 project site located within the Heavy Industrial District of Subarea 15 on the south side of Whittram Avenue between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue at 13195, 13207, 13231, 13243, and 13253 Whittram Avenue - APN: 0229-192-09, 06, 04, 03 & 02. Related Project: DRC2011-00254. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00254 - ALL STATE PAPER AND METAL RECYCLING - JAMES LIN - A request to operate a 4.42 acre recycling facility within the Heavy Industrial District of Subarea 15 on the south side of Whittram Avenue between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue at 13195, 13207, • 13231, 13243, and 13253 Whittram Avenue -APN: 0229-192-09, 06, 04, 03 & 02. Related File: Development Review DRC2011-00255. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18819—WATER MILL HOMES—The proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: Development Review DRC2011-00629, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629 — WATER MILL HOMES — The design review of 16 homes associated with the development of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18819, the proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres of land into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18819, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • 3 of 6 ',att PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA • DECEMBER 14, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONOA I. VARIANCE DRC2011-00383 — WATER MILL HOMES — A request to reduce the minimum average lot size and the minimum lot depth requirement for 1 lot associated with the proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18819, Development Review DRC2011-00629, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. J. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC201 1-00638—WATER MILL HOMES—A request to remove 63 heritage trees in conjunction with a proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18819, Development Review DRC2011- 00629, and Variance DRC2011-00383. V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS • K. DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE STATUS REPORT AND REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES • . VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. • 4of6 I. • a Sew PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Lai DECEMBER 14 2011 RANCHO ' CUCAMONGA I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 8, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. / a. - If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, aplease contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION • The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all . persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the • 5 of 6 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA • tAiri DECEMBER 14, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,216 for maps and$2,328 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us • • • • 6 of 6 • Vicinity Map Planning Commission Meeting December 14, 2011 C B A G, H, I, and J i Li i c c il, 1, _ a `m ° o m I i o.� c� ¢ x x s to I ai 1 1 i J I U j 13. II !!i ro ! I 51-1 o 1 Br 19th �` . _ _ €i " ( �7J Pr Base Line (%% I i e:`Base Line 'r Church 1 ( I / ,I Church Foothill • c` I E = Foothill I >1 RI \ its i Arrow I B ( °= f CO !Arrow Arrow i I Si Jersey t f� ! 8th ! I I oI ; EandF to ti l I l W i h ' E x1 — l!• 6th w N 6t ` _ m ` 1 ¢ x x ` 4th I4th UP Item K is a Development Code * Meeting Location: • Update Status Report and City Hall Review of Proposed Changes 10500 Civic Center Drive CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • Special Meeting Metal Roofing Tour November 2, 2011 Chairman Munoz called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 3:00 p.m. The meeting was opened in the Haven Room within the Planning Department at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The group then boarded the vehicle at 3:10 p.m. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Frances Howdyshell, Lou Munoz, Francisco Oaxaca; Ray Wimberly ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Donald Granger, Senior Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; James Troyer, Planning Director « « « « « • NEW BUSINESS A. PURSUANT TO SECTION 54954(3)2 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL TOUR SELECTED LOCATIONS IN THE CITIES OF UPLAND AND CHINO HILLS TO VIEW VARIOUS TYPES AND STYLES OF METAL ROOFING MATERIALS Donald Granger, Senior Planner, gave a brief introduction and handed out a prior report previously presented to the Design Review Committee dated September 20,2011 to all in attendance(copy on file). Commissioner Fletcher suggested the order of the sites be changed to better accommodate the current traffic conditions. He advised that the Chino Hills sites be viewed first followed by the Upland addresses. Commissioner Oaxaca seconded the motion. The Commissioners unanimously agreed 5-0 to change the order of the tour. No members of the public were in attendance of the meeting. The assembled Commissioners proceeded to the waiting vehicle. Transportation was provided for the public, however, no members of the public attended the tour. The Commissioners made the following comments during the various stops of the tour: Commissioner Oaxaca asked about the size of the tiles, if they have a backing, and the projected lifespan of this roof material. • Mr. Granger said the material comes in sections, and they are backed with foam that forms an air pocket for insulation and sound mitigation. He said the roofing industry projects these roofs to last about 50 years. • Chairman Munoz pointed out very visible valley fleshings and top caps. Vice Chairman Oaxaca asked if there is a variety of material available. Mr. Granger said that it comes in a wide range of colors and styles. Commissioner Wimberly said with some of these roofs it appears there are challenges with making • the top peaks look right;they appear large, they project high above the rest of the material, and they extend beyond the end of the hips and do not appear well integrated with the rest of the installation. Vice Chairman Howdyshell noted that the owners'choice of material was generally a good match for the style of the homes. Chairman Munoz noted that some of the roofs appeared to be installed better than others and with some that were seen, it was difficult to determine because of the shape and dimension of the roofs as they are viewed from the street. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she liked the texture of one of the examples seen. Chairman Munoz said real barrel type roofs have more of a defined undulation than those seen on tour today. Commissioner Fletcher asked about the thickness of the coating on the material. Chairman Munoz said the material comes pre-coated with a sandy/bumpy finish. He noted that • some of the roofs looked like a better installation than others. He asked if roofers obtain a specific certification to install these types of roofs. Mr. Granger said he did not believe so, that they are most likely covered under their general license to install these roofs, but that he would check into that for the specifics. Chairman Munoz said he may have a concern with these being installed as roofing for new home product, but less of a concern for re-roof projects which is already covered in our current Development Code. * * * * * PUBLIC COMMENTS None * * * * * COMMISSION BUSINESS AND COMMENTS Chairman Munoz directed that the issue be brought back to the DRC for further review and consideration. * * * * * • PC Adjourned Minutes -2- November 2, 2011 .r ADJOURNMENT • The Planning Commission adjourned at 5:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, James R. Troyer, AICP Secretary Approved: • • PC Adjourned Minutes -3- November 2, 2011 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • Regular Meeting November 9, 2011 Chairman Munoz called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:04 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Frances Howdyshell, Lou Munoz, Francisco Oaxaca, Ray Wimberly ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Donald Granger, Senior Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Mike Smith, Associate Planner; James Troyer, Planning Director ANNOUNCEMENTS None • * * * * * APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Oaxaca,carried 4-0-1 (Munoz abstain),to approve the minutes of October 26, 2011. * * * * * PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122-CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT-A proposal to subdivide five(5)vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway(SR-210)-APNs: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Variance 2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. B. VARIANCE DRC2009-00020 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - A request to allow perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the maximum wall height permitted in residential districts, for noise attenuation purposes along the perimeter of a proposed 76-lot subdivision with a combined area of about 53 acres in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the • Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. C. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2009-00224 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) • Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue,about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) -APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Variance DRC2009-00020. Mike Smith, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He summarized the prior review of the project and the agency comments received with respect to the Initial Study. He reported that several agencies requested more information to support staffs determination. He said a new Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared, additional mitigations were added and then it was re-circulated. He said no home product is proposed at this time but the request includes a variance and tree removal permit. He said no further correspondence or calls has been received about the revised study or the project proposal. Chairman Munoz mentioned the letters received from SCAQMD, CWCB, the Department of Fish and Game and the Army Corp of Engineers. Mr. Smith confirmed that the delay in moving the project forward was related to time needed to address their concerns. • Chairman Munoz opened the public hearing. Vice Chairman Howdyshell asked for more information about the fencing proposal and if it is compatible with the fencing for the developments to the west. Mr. Smith said we defer to Caltrans for a standard wall design along the freeway, however, if • Caltrans requires the same as those prior developments the walls will be split face block/fluted block. Commissioner Oaxaca noted the copies of correspondence received commenting on the Initial Study and how each specified specific areas of concern. He asked what the specific responses were for the record. Mr. Smith explained that staff re-wrote the initial study and it was then re-circulated in its entirety. Some of the comments related to a claim the hardcopies of various studies we supplied initially were missing. Commissioner Oaxaca said it is not clear where the responses were incorporated. He mentioned the number of lots; AQMD impacts to sensitive land uses. He referred to a 500 foot buffer requirement between the project and the freeway. Mr. Smith noted that the consultants prepared a new air quality study to address their comments. • He said they revised their specific study to address the concerns. He also noted that GHG's were • not discussed at all in the old study as the requirements have recently changed. He said the new • report does discuss them and it includes all applicable data and it is all incorporated into the new Initial Study so the reviewing agency could review our response and new data. Commissioner Oaxaca suggested that it might be helpful to include the specific responses in the future for future projects. Commissioner Fletcher asked with respect to GHGs, air quality, bio habitat, jurisdictional waters if • these were included in the first study or was there not enough detail provided. Planning Commission Minutes -2- November 9, 2011 Mr. Smith explained that some information included in the Initial Study Part 1 such as the number of lots was simply revised over the course of time. He said staff made corrections to Part I and they • are shown in the agenda packet. He said the size of that habitat area to be mitigated was originally 9 acres and was then reduced down to 2.9 acres. He said staff explained how they arrived at the new number and it was put into new study (Part II). He said the new study is the final document. Commissioner Fletcher asked about the height of the sound wall. Mr. Smith said it would be about 22 feet high as viewed from the freeway but would actually be 15 feet from the residents' view. David Jeffers of David Jeffers Consulting Inc, 19 Spectrum Pointe Drive, Lake Forest. He said staffs presentation was thorough. He said over the last 3.5 years they faced many issues. He said Mr. Smith was cordial, professional and very helpful throughout the process and in solving these issues. Chairman Munoz opened the public hearing for comment and seeing none, closed the public hearing. Commissioner Fletcher thanked staff for the thorough report. He said it is a simple map with a reasonable Variance and Tree Removal Permit request. He said he has no concerns and offered his support. Commissioner Wimberly said he concurred. He said the lot design is standard, and the variance is similar to many others and typical. He said he was happy to have had the applicants at the DRC. Commissioner Oaxaca concurred. He said they had some challenges over time but with working • together with staff, they overcame them. He thanks staff for the thorough report and in answering their questions. Vice Chairman Howdyshell noted that comments from 3 agencies can be challenging. She thanked staff for addressing the issues. Chairman Munoz said Mr. Smith did a great report. He noted that this is a fairly standard application. He commented for the benefit of the students and remarked how this is how development gets started. He said the applicants needed to accomplish many things; there is a lot of legwork prior to the project approval. Motion: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Wimberly,to adopt the Resolutions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122; Variance DRC2009-00020; and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(NON-CONSTRUCTION)DRC2011-00990-BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS - A request to modify Conditional Use Permits DRC2007-00258 and DRC2007- 00258U to increase the hours of operation Monday through Wednesday and on Sundays for a sit-down restaurant located at 12375 Base Line Road, Suite 101, in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Planned Community at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek • Boulevard-APN: 227-161-58. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Planning Commission Minutes -3- November 9, 2011 ii Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the permitting of existing structures. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED James Troyer, Planning Director, reported that staff is requesting the continuance on behalf of the • applicants because the applicants have decided they would like to expand their arcade use. Time is needed to re-advertise the item incorporating the expanded use request. Chairman Munoz asked if anyone in the audience wanted to comment that could not attend on December 14, 2011. Seeing/hearing no response, he then asked for a motion. Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Oaxaca, to re-advertise the item as requested for the December 14, 2011 meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried E. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00671 - K. HOVNANIAN - RANCHO 79-A request to add a 5th floor plan, re-plot 9 parcels, add a loggia option to the Plan 1 floor plan and make revisions to the Plan 2 floor plan of the previously approved Development Review DRC2010-00259 for 79 single-family lots on 34.1 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, west of the Southern California Edison Corridor -APN: 1087-101-01 thru-55, 1087-111-01 thru -02, 1087-111-14 thru 1087-111-19, 1087-111-21, and 1087-111-27 thru 1087-111-36. Related files:Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226-1. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse#88082915 and #98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001) and does not raise or create • new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. Donald Granger, Senior Planner presented the staff report. He said the developer has requested four changes from the prior approval: 1-replot 9 parcels to opt floor plans; 2-add Loggia to Plan 1; 3-add 600 square feet to Plan 2—a bump-out on the second story;4-add to Plan 5—a 3,700 square foot model, the largest in this development. He said they will have 26 single-story homes in the development -totaling 33%. He said they already had a certified EIR and no new impacts were raised or considered and the circumstances have not changed, so no further analysis is required. He noted that the DRC requested some elevation enhancements. Chairman Munoz opened the public hearing. Steve Scherbarth of K. Hovnanian Homes thanked Mr. Fowler for his expeditious help. He reported that they went back to a larger square footage because many people want a downstairs bedroom because there is a trend of the elderly moving back in. He also noted the desire for additional storage space. He said Plan 5 added a garage to net 4 cars (1 tandem). Chairman Munoz thanked them for tweaking their product to address the needs of the current market. Commissioner Fletcher asked the applicant to explain the Loggia option. Mr. Scherbarth said they enhanced the bump-out to the backyard to make it more marketable. Commissioner Oaxaca asked for more information about the 9 lots that are being re-plotted. • Planning Commission Minutes -4- November 9, 2011 • Mr. Scherbarth said they are shifting them to make them fit better. He said there are no extensive changes. • Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she is pleased that K Hovnanian is willing as a company to be proactive to what buyers want, especially to add a downstairs bedroom. She noted that the loggia is also a nice feature. Chairman Munoz closed the public hearing. Vice Chairman Howdyshell complimented the developer for their proactive approach. Commissioner Oaxaca gave a second to that. He said this is a great example of the developer thinking on their feet with respect to the market. He said it is very attractive and he is looking forward to seeing it completed. Commissioner Wimberly said the builder came forward with a product mix to meet the demands of the market. He thanked them for working with staff and the DRC and for responding to our comments. Commissioner Fletcher noted that it is a previously approved project with minor changes for the better. He said he hopes they get it built and sold fast. Chairman Munoz said it was a pleasure to work with the applicants. He said they have come back to finish what they started. Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Wimberly, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2010-00671. Motion carried by the following vote: • AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried « « « « « NEW BUSINESS F. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00560 - AMERICAN TIRE DEPOT - BEDROS DARKJIAN -A request to construct a 7,885 square foot tire sales and service building on a 1.38 acre parcel within the Victoria Commons Retail Center within the General Commercial District at 11951 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0229-023-01. On January 24, 2007 a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Donald Granger, Senior Planner presented the staff report. He noted that in 2007 the Victoria Commons Development was approved and construction is again occurring. He said the proposed architectural design is of a contemporary winery commercial design theme. He said unsightly views will be blocked from the street view and the service bay windows will be tinted. He said the design has excellent articulation, shadow, relief, and visual interest including a stacked stone element. He said the DRC recommended approval after the first round. He said the environmental determination is still consistent with no need for further review and no additional mitigation measures. He reported that no correspondence was received or calls. He said the project is near the historic Aggazotti • House and conditions are included to ensure this use is a good neighbor such as low-level noise equipment and a special material on floor of the service bay will minimize tire squeal. Planning Commission Minutes' • -5- November 9, 2011 Commissioner Fletcher asked if the Aggazotti home is a personal residence or a business. He said the parking there resembles commercial parking. He also asked about access to the site. Mr. Granger indicated it is a residence and there are two points of access along Foothill Boulevard. • Commissioner Oaxaca asked about the location of the service bays. Mr. Granger said the entrances to the bays are on the south side of the building looking north. Chairman Munoz said it was a good report. Bedros Darkjian said they have been in process for 9 months. He reported that they ended up with an entirely different but better design. He said they did a full noise study. He said this is their 40th store in California and it has the latest technology. He said they agree with all the conditions of approval. Chairman Munoz asked if there was any public comment. Seeing none, he closed the public comment period. Commissioner Fletcher noted that the design worked out well, it will be a nice visual from Foothill Boulevard and he has no concerns. Commissioner Wimberly said the applicant came to DRC and they worked with staff very well. He said it is fantastic that they had no revisions. He said it is a sound, attractive project-it will be nice. He said he looks forward to seeing it. • Commissioner Oaxaca said the structure looks nice and the tower element recalls the winery theme around the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • Vice Chairman said it has a nice presence along Foothill Boulevard. She said it sounds like it came together quickly and that there was a good partnership. Chairman Munoz said ditto to all. He mentioned that there was little work to do at DRC. He said we are cautious about building a tire center on Foothill boulevard, but this is designed so that this could go from a retail center to something else easily. He said the look of it does not say "tires" and all concerns of noise etc. were addressed. Motion: Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2011-00560. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried * * * * * DIRECTOR'S REPORTS G. DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE STATUS REPORT AND REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES James Troyer, Planning Director, presented the staff report and a brief PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Chairman Munoz noted that staff is updating the Development Code for the first time in many years. • Planning Commission Minutes -6- November 9, 2011 • • Mr. Troyer thanked Assistant City Attorney Steven Flower for his assistance and noted that he knows more about zoning codes than most attorneys. • The secretary received and filed the report. « « « « « PUBLIC COMMENTS None « « « « « COMMISSION BUSINESS AND COMMENTS Chairman Munoz commented on the full parking lot at the grand opening of Hobby Lobby and the future opening of Farrell's Ice Cream Parlor. He said business money is coming back to Rancho Cucamonga. He thanked staff for all their hard work toward that end. « « « « « ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Oaxaca, carried 5-0, to adjourn. The Planning Commission adjourned at 8:03 p.m. • Respectfully submitted, James R. Troyer, AICP Secretary Approved: • Planning Commission Minutes -7- November 9, 2011 • STAFF REPORT ��"n"n • ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: December 14, 2011 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: VACATION V-218 — ETCO HOMES INC. — A request to vacate vehicular access rights for one driveway on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of Vintage Drive along Lot 11 of Tract Map 16867- APN 225-611-39 Related File: DRC2011-00032 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: In conjunction with the processing of DRC2011-00032, a vehicular access was proposed on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of Vintage Drive, by the Developer, Etco Homes Inc. Said drive approach will be used as a second access to the private equestrian trail of the subdivision. Its location along Lot 11 of Tract 16867 has been approved by City Departments. The vacation of the vehicular access rights dedicated on Tract Map 16867 allows for the addition of said drive approach. The proposed location is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. RECOMMENDATION: • Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the finding, through minute action, that the proposed vacation is in conformance with the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval. Respectfully submitted, Dan James Senior Civi Engineer DFJ:WAV/rlf Attachments: Exhibit A - Vicinity Map Exhibit B - Legal Description Exhibit C - Plat • Item A • -C VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE L .1 —v4ivetdglDr �1 t I v l Rosgl_lle Dr KeenW dPb [I 11 . .\��A,- zDr� a I t , 23rd 5berin oJL „L (I 3 ;:.1,• 6 Ban Yanig s 1 4,79 v i ' �ra .,. Banyan st �{ .1 t Yen L l $ � +�Lr T” 1 r k'i, I :;4 pa+fro TACT /EQ67 3f u� ]12. ` ' [ e•LA V,"1-4, 4 r 51c4 bmv; k i y2.7'. 1i � -Vy� T' s r�xs 31. , 1 pod A" ,t'�L' fk i ffqq�J y/ p 7 t �RV � � if 4f,PI: �OaO���.I r49 &6 4 K 3}P � dery �N ,v Iri i i�'�:.'1,.s '�ti 1,47; t•'711 '� 4;Sp A�;-'�tgif efe 4:i z'._` c' °A'ir�-�Pir'„%6� of 3 ht ii' J a-'_r r; 'ri �Itiq r73,R^� lid', rlti � , r 1s` - s„_I",;1.', r ..2.;13 rte, ?d , iL7S"'_ c � iii ..J N•t t R , SL t./ �, 7 I�. iw t , ) Jessie S . 1 An,^ �.C! i 5g dIC[I 8'S[ ur 1UOF ;'. 11tt4 ` ^� .� : ,,v . L LIr ` t , { � ' i FIR`i • T ta City of Item: Tract No. 16867 Rancho Cucamonga Title: VICINITY MAP ENGINEERING EXHIBIT: 1 DIVISION • A-2 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION VACATION OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS BEING A PORTION OF TRACT MAP NO. 16867, RECORDED IN BOOK 327, PAGES 7-10, INCLUSIVE, OF TRACT MAPS, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 11 • LABELED NORTH 00°15'04" EAST 73.12 FEET, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE TRACT BOUNDARY AND WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF ETIWANDA AVENUE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°15'04" EAST 16.70 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS TO BE VACATED; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00°15'04" EAST 12.00 FEET; SAID POINT • BEING THE END OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS QUITCLAIM; THE ABOVE DESCRIBED IS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HEREWITH AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. LAND (rL 9 up o No. 5133 *r Exp.6/30/13 \Q TFDF CAI °9' SHEET 1 OF 2 • BY-TAP EXHIBIT A A-3 ,,,.. . • VACATION OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS I • C 1 . VINTAGE DRIVE W - N38'09'35"W A ' W 24.20' Q . 1 1 4 LO7 -J1 VEHI U R ACCES RICH TO THE C TY I VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS ►PER RACT NO. 16867 , TO BE VACATED ( M.B. 127/7-10 TRACT NO. • 12.00 DRIVEWAY 1 Ei S 6 7 ei / ivLB. 327/7-10 T.P.O.B. 16.70' Q PRIVATE EQUESTRIAN EASEMENT , P.O.B. a PER TRACT NO. 16867 .� z M.B. 327/7-10 .' 4 "`y Q AND 5 H rn In O I w W No. 5133 co J o Exp.6/30/13 e* °oN \ 9TFOF CAL\FC�\ . .. . _ _ .,._ - SOUTHER T C RVER ___ TRACT N 1 8 7 8 A._______.,< ,____r--n' SCALE: 1" =30' SHEET 2 OF 2 • BY:TAP EXHIBIT B A-4 • STAFF EPORT L RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: December 14, 2011 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01012 -AT&T MOBILITY - A request to replace 6 antennas with 12 antennas and related equipment on an existing 70-foot high (top of antennas at 65 feet) monopine wireless communication facility (originally approved as Minor Development Review DRC2002-00417), located within the Red Hill Community Park at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue at 7484 Vineyard Avenue - APN: 0207-031-33. Staff has determined that this project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption - Existing Facilities). SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: • Site - Red Hill Community Park - Open Space and Flood Control Districts North - Alta Loma High School — School District South - Single-Family Residences — Low Residential District East - Single-Family Residence — Low Residential District West - Adult Care Facility and Single-Family Residences — Office Professional and Low Residential Districts • B. General Plan Designations: Project Site— Red Hill Community Park - Open Space and Flood Control North - School South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Office Professional and Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The existing wireless facility is sited within the 44-acre Red Hill Community Park, which is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue at 7484 Vineyard Avenue. ANALYSIS: A. Entitlement Requirement: Section 17.26.010 of the Development Code classifies all wireless communication facilities that are located on public property as Major Wireless Communication Facilities. Section 17.26.070 states that Major Wireless facilities shall be approved by a Conditional Use Permit. The existing facility was approved by a Minor Development Review on • July 2, 2002 (DRC2002-01012), and is non-conforming under current regulations. The approval of this Conditional Use Permit will bring the site into conformance with the current regulations. Item B • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2011-01012 —AT&T MOBILILTY December 14, 2011 Page 2 • B. Project Description: The applicant proposes replacing the 6 existing antennas with 12 new antennas in order to upgrade the facility to the latest wireless transmission technology (4G-LTE). The existing 70-foot high, stealth wireless communication facility (top of antennas at 65 feet) is in the form of a pine tree. The existing facility is in conformance with the lease agreement that the applicant has with the City and the proposed changes will not require a modification of that lease agreement. The new antennas are 4 feet longer than the existing antennas, though the overall height will not be increased as the applicant is lowering the point where the antennas are attached to the trunk of the monopine by 2 feet. The changes will also include adding 12 remote radio units (RRU), two small surge suppressors, and a GPS antenna. The related equipment will be housed inside the existing fully enclosed equipment shelter, except for a small GPS antenna that will be attached to the outside of the equipment shelter. C. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, which covers the repair, maintenance, permitting and minor alterations of existing facilities. Because the project only involves adding new antennas to an existing wireless communication with no changes to the size or location of the existing equipment enclosure, staff concludes that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on his own independent • judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff has not received any letters or phone calls expressing concern over the Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01012 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitte , Jam R. Troyer, AICP Plan ing Director JRT:TV/ge • • Attachments: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Development Plans Exhibit B - Photo Simulations Exhibit C - Propagation Maps Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01012 • B-2 • O I 4 = I si_ E • s ` ae I u q} `� . s z ft Z G '2 Ig _ goal, O °°°O hE 5192 Q " Uks o _ e 84 $ s U3,- ° LL °05 14 : `. gi !--.� s 9g g P = ¢ W yWg itg,� -' tsa: �_a `s� a 61 I w9 r I, it e @�. a d � g s n gr t..s z - 4 ,I '2E43. 345 i `ogu e 6 .. qg p. .o°°OC ? 4 n E WE b b 5 .. s 4 B a ggEoo °o ..d5g Y $ c Ii Q re wur.. a 2 8%° #' a _ CC : E kj • N Q o -Q-s '' g i �� U W z J -�-1 W N cc s;ti a — 0 0 Ca a • m z U s SSo� € H ,~=mod Q L i o� 2 e .N ev /),I •\ co o N I- Z —J w .sF£ w W 2 ° ca'` d - s goy'' E`s, ')s Oh; — > W 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CC co N °: P'.„ D p o¢ ..OZ w Tu c-a W F w o n N W I yQ V-93 2 W W Z6 J 4 2 2 g W_V X a I- a a Z mas W ° ° O) J K F z 5 h ?'° o S s2n Q W N W U' Z -J W W , o ° N .. _ g i ° ¢ K X dN Q W 1 R W o -,\ 5 a Lei • 1- N N N N N N ._y Eu 5555555 _ ggs 5 EXHIBIT A sgs 1 ,. 1 - 1 r' . I: 2—i o I , y4 -^ �•.. — 117 0' a t • \- fe y7YL. 1. Ins: FT ;��I —_._—_. _.—___ ____---/I—Rio/Thin-WI/7_—_ _____ ._.__. _ ;c ;dye _ /i by."'. ->) -.v1 rte. 9 1, rsI, 7r; �g { --- ; s a it F ; — I Q I k0 la ^.T 50 ii , a' `� 18� 4 9.4 - ' _ /�sY 7 P: Ck: r 1 Fs,? b'/ Q >;_\ zz„r k I m1 I' "`, c tti \ Icy 1 ‘ \\ E E \ e 1i.T) kr J'.l'ry I �� I I � ;I / � 1' I e I 3; a \ j I I + nm\ I 1 I ra W N ., I y pe e� € ge flo a g 2 4 s3 a E 3 ir'. `.6 ° e s os 1 T P 1 pie del$ ,. i trthi N. . I <al4" \, ; 4 � 14 F 0 i , 1, nI Z \`\ / J 3�� , I 5 ;,J€ w = H a . 6W Z w« z3 Q z_ _ 2H j N p 6 �A' q 4[ 1 gY[ o E ge t: as a 2i a 4 ' S Q 1 ',.. i Till 11 . i _— -, 44 ad �\ r' _ off£ j 0 15 `i a ig v�\ / = e ° <\ / �• J Fa _ _ W . I 2 4 2 I VI- . . y V t. Z IN • '--# i I- -•° 111 =I° 3 •„ .. - ec: 1 1 lanais pangne31•1, ) rTh:I. WOKS minal03 lInv It i .6-.01 '1 / -c .e-,01 (1 1 .. . A. „ t 2 2 ,. . , , r 4 .., / ..... , : N‘, , A . ...,, .,.,_ • .,.. •, ; , ; ; ! , g 1 47, e . . ..... i i i f-----I — 21 '..., ,t7r, —1— I 7 ..,‘ I ... . re 1 ' I o - 4. .. ‘ • 1;:, 77" ---"r El i fl z x '‘', . 77,t,__ . , 5— ° ?g01.4 4— ,..,Ly;3 1 i , q i , 0 Z . 1 j! I ] , F 1 I I I i - Hit ' , 4 11 1 11 ; .9, . 1 9 , i - 1"- : DI 7:,1 ! , ag I i, , , I / -, ri-i : • ly . FiSH 1 1 ilill / . , .. , _i , I 1 / , I .,, : ,,T ! \i„, i .I , i , i I J H ,, [ ', 1 1 o;- on• 1 I 5z 5 5 t: a 0- lOt".ii sec 0 _ i cc oo og e ' g —I g g 11 1 1 .; 1 gli 1— 2 2 2 1 1 I IS 1 1 1 i 1 g 8 I 1 23 g 2 2 2 2 2 i o ,., 5)- i e i i 2 i 5)- 2 9 2 2 2 2 1— Z 08 1 1:22 ' Z 4—/ U.1 i— LA CO r..T 2 2 o L.1 u.1 -L-. a ..„.... I, ... 4- , I t = ,_ __ ------- ---- --- :: :., , •:. ._... ., ''0, fv, . v, - ,5 :i Si ,.,, • ti -- ' I -, ;El %R 1 2 a- ..:-. I 1,1 ;, 21 2.. 2 2" g 1 i .le .1'' . n .-5 in " , Fel I ! ! k t'l • 6 F.'. 1 e; - I - 1 ll 1 I - 41,43;11141 i. . 1 t a..',4, ?..0414:11t i• I' 7.1::.:.reirk411‘,4)c.11 : 1 Itlii 2 t !I .."Ri 14...k ibi':;,:i :LA: r----1 ' 1 I I “ #47..4.? '20, K. ‘27.4,,.4 :.,.-. i 1517-11 ft: .W. Alik, rta.,44,-A -•,, ,4•1-7 1 4.4 j • :, ' 1 ----,•:• --i'' tisa, •z:•x A.,y4-7,4.14.-. .,.: c•airc,, --1 1 ‘.7. . „. , .., -2. ,...,•,,.. . _ .-.•.,...••, ..a,,,_. i„,„..1 it-4v,, i• .. !7„,,,,3 y•,,,ti 1 0 'It• .." j i• ,, , ! - 5--a W 11 fil 4/2i I jej 7, filfit 1:Li .a d 4,,,Cr.ili D.4.' far -tt -. V .... 7 1.. . tpoi,„1 ..?,. .0 s j.,.. 1.. ■ / 1 yi j el ' -- 'i / 1 silt of .1,, g 1 Z 0 II e, lif Li 3_ 5,i I i z.' i S2b 1a i1;1 d d 4 z 1t„a i, 2 2 .*I *LF CiIJ l 4<2 i Fr d• F ? -* . . thucd'?: e ir 0 ze, 1 NI 8 g . 4 • n .4u . r .. 1412 il -1 ■1.1 1:y e .e. r. , A-r° "'-'• e i , - k .„,,,, `• 13 7 i r t"g 0 tt.1 121 111 g' SJ tl til "1, E• h it rt, '1=22 1 il 1 1 i ;jiff . a I ! • x _a., 1 1 I 1 .& 1 , , 0= -j F 'Li'. ■.■•••••rrtr; ' ' k ',g it ,tNt -‘4.1....nsit - \ 2 3. ':.' 1.^..,:... .. 't.7....,.• - ' i .,.. 11.13k:-.. On tC:.•;c .74'1,11 ,.. r :': :,-,.:'S1?"..i,viv.i-Lve, tuit,ia.....4 '':', - ; I 03W r0."19 rsHit: ,r irt-,:i., --, -,,,a...,,, - 0 , ,, n_J-1, .s.,,,,w .,. .„ „ ,., .A: low ,,,q, -, . , , LJ , t - p,-- b ii* vit ,„-- ni_i . da .41 -' - -- Ai Liii A -,.. ,...,_ tri 4 4., 4, yrf 1..,isi .i.', ii..• r / iu l' g 0 , .11 id • 1 I „ i ▪ < d1 ▪ Isl rt3 r.:2 1 ie ! k 1 q ... i 1 = c ,..., . , E Ei; E 2 g , - 1 I. 22 2 26 2 2 2 2 2 E' - Q. `--- . I I 1 I 1 .... r o g 12- '74 , .04/ _____,5 /5 ,, L ra I . / 5-o ' iin .J. 'I I 'Elf 1:18 't$ .,.. , • *.r 1 . ta 5 °is t.,. 1 ; y „ — ; is! I 'El . H ! I 1 H I g SF / 0 \ .., i I aze . :%, ---- MEISIN ,, " Set;',e*150"47''SI\ i I, , 54.‘ ,..„.. A .., -,n .3.-,..4.: . --.4r i ---—......:-I 1/2'71 90 4 ira: 4e;:ficluk wyt, 4.- 1 \ i bt,Ol.rthh- top ,„ 4 -, .* ;`/I*-13tra; 47-IT. 8/4airs, -4; , /5;1'5 L ! t4,:,..7% .e. I t? I '''' ' '‘I ' ti. tir 114 '4?"--ikklif5:-5-1,51:.'''•) 174472!t7'7 IL:11.174f'' • I 1,-Rd"A' .:2".' \ 8 1— 71 n y i I i ! I g 3 1:1 i al , .c.,.., ).sr.. :,-,” ? 6 I4-1 8 1 I '11 P is I :I' 2,,..,(/) 'i;52c.'e•■:I 1 IL Oa 11 o o rtg,5. g - ...-. ' I- g g 11 di i gh B72Sn • L 1. 'E tr 0-zt Et; 0 .t.ft. r■ Y.., I il 4 ; ,“ il -5g •17 A , 5i'l i g le Ei ' 7,5; 19 ; E.ii f:ci I i la t I 214 „ git.H 0 II & 1 i 2 t 2: ;ft I 1 i 11 illt. — I I II et a -' -1 I. 075 b 15.4 ...?15,1 \AI % I \ 0 r- 1,,, 5, ‘ ..P rIti .'" fOrn .'44 1 0., A eseeverneit i 0., at S.,.,t a, 1 Iph 56 /?, , 15.....: N \ r--E 1 E i: ti ', ' , , 0, 4...%)14 .T 4i. / .: c :L. 7,htit ( A 4/ 77 44 — ...5 8 I Z i 1..79 ? '?' I-1 z I b ti, ct i 4 i g 2 i 1 q E 1 /9 ! 22 0 ii i i i o F. ^ I .5 i 48)rim'N\\ !! E- / 0 ././er '8 Z - P. Ea Et i di / Li' .. ...... .................. . ..,................. ..... , . 1 •- 4 _. I ,. • 4 r 2 I .., • 2 I _ ____ ,„, '4'::i . _______-- --- , LI 1 ° k hi; „...,.. .'" 1 - 7., ..,;k; , ? ;1 2;•; ,g -7 ))Jji ... , 0 2 -3 6 it 2 2. I 61 -J2 1re 6- i i k 3 3 4 re ri i ■ =' /7 ; tti I 2 2 E 7.1 1 P ,- 74‘:,.. ' (te rilit -- 2 _, J .I.K....2:: 1 1 si0,1 W-; k ''''"1 r " • .,,,•24„....>„.;.,,,,,,„„ I 4 4 .. ' _..kr', tr‘", t-vc,,..,1”,‘,‘• iiii,:(,44•4 ' : ! b 4r4.-4111\l',-;‘ 14, ,fl ' t r,';---;.---• ,x., ?, - , ‘;-.,;.,..a.114--- 4. • -,,....,;,..I r • -t-t"' . . ' ' • t: +ttii 4 '4 4„ '-',. „ 1 , •• 2! 10 1St •1\,..I/4 tql. 45't r'' '‘ wi 2;71 nt 1 I i , , !,, 2 2 cit 10.6.11i. -• • .t.t,.. ,, e 9 1 i i -‘ 'V 41141),(9.4 .:tj:':: LLI 0 '12 • A, p '' •F 1,:e- LI Pa I I z-z.wF 9 _e 5.9R-2 1- Ei •-• I =2 2 \IL 2 21 • I g .Ig,;ti . r' -, NI -.. g.o-.. e. . - ; 1, -, -1 •..11 4 t! 1 b IF .1..1'5 221 61 I r 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 ! I I r ; 1 i ps it, - Sae• , n.ez E 0-2 0 5 : if,-.% ' c-• ''',.'l %\ 1I2')...•-■' 'A ;%'‘t V ' • 4% ' ' ' k..:,.: '' ‘47 'al:thes'--Y1W.1f.."7.',7W6SI1I-""ar4r!••4••214n. .-01,11`. ..-* . 1'414' 16i E l'' .!, ,,-,-,--_,.. . ..4,..;,.., v,7- -,-arts '.. itt s,..0, - / , : , EI--. ... - ifo: #f ef '--., y 04 °- eil fir 7 •44-re 7 ,•,„‘...,‘ 4-,-. .fi, 4 • i ;or d ki,,i; i; i,, :71., Iti 4 v ri,..., f' '0; 0 sz- - e/4 itip wiz /1 --j.., *;-^ t•J z„ 1 ! 0 Ert - ts,••;: ■ • li [ 1 ' i I 2 , I I I LLI1 rII; -t 11 i 2 g t• Tk m• E' i \ Li CL 0 0 o N 0 111 C 0 o to d C cn ° o E ° c o° .-.._ Q E a p , t000 U04' a W y °o ; 4)} O Jag Mli CO S II rn • 2 yU c co- o co C C U S r et U co C n Cr fn k 'w$ ./ •y } ♦- ,...... _q r 12 c c C I, s .. 13 C -C CO s ■ H w c Q E ° 0 d . E O C 'C y H r N_ G. r1 N N _ {� ` . � • iii V V O uJ : 8 d I O G < j v f. 5 Aluii 1 IN 1 ....k S. C. . 0 cD° I h c v m Q C C It I 0 I- ci - E a o c xcSy 0 -0 m W W d rs vj 5 _ i )))))124-j 0 Acidit "ftlilliv .I Yea B-11 O n- C = Eillir'. ~� m F Q 0 yU c z v cc na O Q n U CO . ik I Amp. N C O Q N N c m Xa a 1t , co iA- vo 1.t.,1 i 12 ... .... .1,..111,..47, ''./:4M111 li Li j r m C f 5 o o 3-' T i III7;, o U.. m n w r_ 4';a6 O c .••r�p .�• Q)•..'ti II N o E y cr G V1 w m E E J a` _ r 1 g . a t' 7 < •• • • , .A ./4141' 44(41pillt tz AM 1 0 W J r I..i 2. At V ilEr'V • Q cii o ell Tz 0 `;._ i' -, - '. B-12 ))))) :•:, = _ R71 S t • C. .1'3 U cu c x g o i Q CU . j O U op n. Ct h Q ,,,;re � a i m i S c • co a d C i.� O f ~ ¢ Eo ..3, .-- ^ } a h E Y c.'7 amC .4 '.i kw I` .h r l r' U a` }' p e i gg °e a R co .p - W C D / h. '� Cij �\ H O O a _ E o Z O N y R E R . .i.'41.4 'il:';',. = )))) • - 18' , , RS B-1 3 0 +a...lie W +a ai . )))) 0 a 0 • 113 V I MI ■— I- -- a F p N -I C y C O N N 0 m C N d _W N N N QOm Lc E '- 0 c1- • U vo Y/ C Z C) 0 a C) 0 ,. C N Z J Y ) L. G) 07 ) CD RI MI V) V1 Q Q N o f- o ,,es N i- Q EXHIBIT C B_14 OIS N OD • L N CU N Y 7 Y a U a L v Y L H C) N CO C OD Y >• L N L >- t6 Y 3 Y v v O Q to OCD 3 O } to O ,H rli .N Y C IV 4J (U -0 C 4., O 4-, 3 aJ CU C CU C > n CU co U v 0 - C f° L Co ° E v ..--. CU to Coo v N '^ h a Y ° a O 0 V L 41 C D N CU "C N Co +' O v- O_ > L Q ,L., co Y N OD -O O O L cc 44-: C) _ C L i CO 41 C Co Q + Y O_O W v > L Y N O OA 7-1 Y J L- OU H E C o +�, a p ti0 vi L C O N _CU OND to ai >•• N Q to = •L T co L C a �' c C) co p i 4J 1 CCo N O Co _C +' N O 0> N O O OD DJ N d C N +' cr. m > O u- C 0 > .Q cU to Q Y v °'• a La O fl.. L co tL OU N +L, L �, 41 m OD Q O O w to ' J '♦3 L C C O N v orb C > -0 y, O . . C Y 41 -O O 8'- C1 Y N C) -0 to 7 V N + "O N ¢ i 4J 'n v vi .� i1 0 C O OD C N co L a o O C • U C ILI L 41 +) N CJ O. co C -O 'n m 2 L to y., 'C > U C 4J Q co O O ; E O CO N O W Co O� O_ U v a-- m O L7 OUD 3 _ OD +, tU Q U C s... i o (O co i tU c a C a CO C N C V H 4J to 4J L i 0 y d -O f— V N tLo .OD 30 `�_ OD ate+ t1J +L'' +- L O t- N �( Co N C Y E Y 0 M._•CU ^i Q - C) — _O L ....7�' L 4- Y ¢ N L Y N Co Q N •U > p O O N +_' 4-. OD C O C m cc L L p O1 E 'X •? v C L >, N 0o w O- E Y v N- ei �, c L L Y aJ OD OD +L.+ C > O >• Y *p N OD to 0 7 C 13 -p O 4 H rn C O C C co Y -0 LA ru C) p - ¢ N L. t9 _O C U to O ;� "O N N > yL,., Q i �' C OD C +' CU C 3 O el) a O p ' O_ C p 'O N W O V w O L A +U, v v O Co co H U' W O > •H O Q to J N . . O N -p N L OD LJ N v I- Y ai 2 4J "O .� aJ v on E .c to L .-a N 0. i0 a Y i O •C i0 LD C (n 41 C CDC co I— C a) ea•14— CU p tL �' C N O OD Y C 'L ON -1:3 Y O U U C L oar r C) E L C v— f4 co v 0 U t QJ N UI O O- to O OD O in t+ O d L N 'O_ L :13 Y a, C +, 4I ❑. L C Y N N Y CU OD > iL, N L f' 0 OOA +L-' O vO fa m W t I=— '4J O 3 .L Y _7 I4,1 Co N a O C Co Q • N •• C N O_ • = U 3 3 • O L 3 4J N O L Y p > L N Q.. L ~ O L o H • • N • N U . m a • Q • B-15 H 0 J v OM :1 C d a U 0 a) r G M ° r mE L 0! G ce Q ca Y E Q x ct a cv 0 0 Cie OM a B-16 hiI I i `l \ I� i-J. ii ; -t -3 •1 03 —E —i—rAL_I)R- \ 1 l''. ._,A s\.T.:,.. ...v-- ) . ~----cl, 1 03 7., o.,,,z, LR:i ua --I)) 1 ° -A- T.-, '7. ' Or) 0 To -E -' >. i e,,,2 c1/4.,_,___t __,__4 [ ..e.,. op 7_2 . , —'4 < > i--r. S'. -3 - .-1-• ..-c,..---. `2* -tc,_ f cz Lit �JJ, , � I 1 { � 11 V ill, #+. _ T I 14T . i I j I—' - ITS- -! - r`' � ' � `1 -�=-i � I�� L-Jf , I -LI I I --� ti\ 111 1 ' ,n 9-j ' -I I1 I I ,I T7-1 1 r TT I1 ' •1 - I ' ' — 4 f-� � J _1 I` vj - '-1 I , �I x, 1 � IL 1 i (i r I a - IP � Ic I-T1— L� �, i 2w 1 —i r _ I —r a,___1 I� � I f j , II =00 - J 14. I I •_ a, 3? _ i 1 = &Ri c o f mil I—_ ="T J. J 1. _� t�� 21- j -) a __I__;-- - r .,,, >c a_., • __,__1 __1--1-,— 1 _ : 121:1 .-- I . I 1 ____. rrt-Th 'RL, I 7 ,- - -=-1 --= 1 i-1 ) :il {,-7. r ' - -11'71 'It! LI 0- c: , _ ._ _ _ -71• _. 1.-_,-- _, --__:- -c-,:-.-„‘\-. .),,,,,ot i/■-)...1\i! __T..7 i i_4, -. _- - - - 1 . ,-r-k ,..---"" ..--/r)•-.) —• 'N., 11(iii___J.:7\zim .l C �/ I f F- q I I I I i 11�._ 'c�, — F- _,� I ,1,t l l rr z -1-, I� : 11- • i I,) I I ( I, r,I-1-, j -1-� 1 _, '-1 [ • ' II �_) -FL P I 1_ \ .7„ __ +_ I .1 '' , L_ 1�T viii r,I-- I! - I� { X - I'� _! { III _1 —I-- TI I I - I -I1 --�-�- _-T-L1 I i- ____J-_'IT i� ''_L 1 i - i�1- _I 1 — _- --,--_- ! - v) ---- —_ flr -_� - r- � _ aj -- - IJ =1 �. 1 ; " I ti - p _ [ O Y HHfl _- I -- - L -i'- 1 { TTr ; I I . I L U rim -r I - i—; i • cp W - ? i l l I I f�r - [11----__- I a : I r NI 711- l 1 1-= •1.) � I` 141 ; B-17 • IC 1.•A Yom± •.• Ir.. _,. ., 1 3-Z-/ Op I . 4.. - .- . +r 13 I co 0 a) i f n i } .� i))))) I) Q C as cn m J`.. L c (.7):, 0 -(5- o � L 1_. �� j qi A' co m i d m ( _ tall W - , 0 - II II & , 1 r 1 . i v v Q 'pH'4.1 o 0 Lil 0 !■ ;IN 1 ` ub. >. Ili •1 ZrJ s 4 1 S •T .. s� iii it u Il ir....C -may- --+ L r '++ ` 11 d 1r 7: - 1 1�ah I .c i �_. - - _3--1 L`, � i 1 P I 7 Y. ,„• Airz/•M MM I.. rat- s 61. i i s ••. i •i 7< 1 1' { �j to I i it _ rf., 1 <L. ,it J _ Y co ram "� `.2,1„, :. "� ~ 6 ..• I * • .e ..1 e , ,.. c , - . < e..) co Mali 0 in I' _4644- - Fini CNJ i- 0 Vii. a •�:_ ,�.. t '. . = • •p U . • .'. i � � ,a -0 1 0:.. `. ' r fa CI. _ _ == = ,_�, . •ice, ,i.._ -;; , 1 ;1'i`''I •' Al• ..41••••il tz j d ., _ g LA rg off .2'-11 1 ' . iv,O � - 1 4. - I.„. 1 ti:t /. i 1 � •"; _ k : ".7'• _, r • = • V ' 7 F,R J� t• •t 1 'ti l a � - co - - - i 1 B-18 I Cr i�+i 1 rig E f.i) CO 1 J O • �-•r1 - 'r 1)))) •• . a > ci o M ti 70 J C V7 '- .. 'a al n o m C � .. i _ 1 (A II II C • i ._i u ac- , • Ilk I . .x .• °49. 4 :. W _ r _ 1 � , •` 3' r•� jj . is(I aim 'Ili iii W . ••I - Y H•4.) it il. ', ' ..• . =‹.'" ✓ �• r oaE '~ •�.• A 4 •X' ti I l�rrr�v V1 f b E•�_ 1 (Ira Cn 1 4: lir —j 1 q' i_ 0 Q) ca r, i., s•• r m m g L. t ....4. .0 . 0. . 1,J ... U w; C s _ 0 as fit r 1 _ I e. �• I. ,1 f • , - I• , .c , - 1 :._ .......a,■ ' "). 4 el 1111LI W �' _ ° 1 -1- 4 a+�r v aa' y!, it�' •'; r , a- III• r B-19 ti S , • O p CO r m .7 ;1 0))))) cc N O -O 'O .TO to y N N C m N �, N ,CD L N I `• N N 2 N N Fes- v Q1 n_,c c= aa A c v -•, - j 3 r- +- ~ U c 1 3 °� a ' E m c c n.4 o m a1 m I 0 - s a?i c aai U 3 E o u 3 .c c m ¢ p -.I d1 JD tr u 2 2 2 `m ip I N t— O a V O I c O ,0 O y .= 5 �i QI c 3 N 61 3 N .. y � . � c � .-'° m 3 S m L ti S � m' [L � � � ,u � � � 3 c u+ � c p a 5 � � 3 ,� N § C 3 Cr' (n T `,d O u-1 CC 2 T 3 LL y c F., E n d v v a1 3 L. .o o (-(7') > _a a_ a _a.E .� 2 U .8 aci m H 1 > > .� -DN m m m - � � � ,O � QI y d S O O. O_ a � 7 U L 61 p ?� O � � d , U O N '' o 9 3 m 6 7 U E E 2 Q Q Q Q 2 in r 0 c7 O O O 0 U u'1 u1 O U °c ti . u1 r N 0) 4 IA fD f• W D7 �' '� N N N N N N N N N N f•1 Pi C') tom') M f'�7 Cn') I'I') ;(•u••!rL - r ■. i ••• MINK &=- tf .■i■■/i■■ ! ■ I $1r T -. G -X1,1 6 I _•-- t _ i ; -- ,-� ,7i r, � 11---1--•% 7 1T y� I 1 a t` `r` 4 _i _^- - _ — -f I , -il Li -4. -,111L----i I .; C.11 I ,.-i!'..r: '-'-*-i -1!1'116k:1111- Ali, 11,1 - .'T.. '---1-17,--T- _C---Til.1111-----,"164 1,1 IP. -If -1,,.3111 (•----, ------., p i . -. -_,.. „_,--1 I I � ' � f-T --1 I i ' , - -4 --1 I I! 1 - , I t ' T II -1- I- ■) i — _I, ! 0)g ~`T I I' _ ' y I - 1 ,fit �_1 I T----- __ It I; i I _._r, �- ; a> .4 • ---..-• -- 1::1 'I' ..I • .-.: „ C__ .i - .1 f,i " WI 77 1 _ ■I i ) ._ �I 1 S{ r-. Ll t i t —. _- - I� .j-. __,—; l- l-I t Off' 1 ) \ 7J-! fTT� ; P..-. T--t 1 .- = i J ? 's ' -{ f e_) -r I I - r°1�� - ^U f. ;1ti11 is- } + el co Cy)Do 1• Y I '.�r - 'la i raj 1 1 ' 1.-_ ' :- L..' +I � H t J uk--;, 1 ,7'r 1--;1 Q _ r F 1 A_ 1 11 ' —_ td t 4 F.:::----.- i — `- --I I r' .f ' I I - .4 ■ L I f -- �- ' —1 i ■ _ 1 1 ' 1 -iI ,_- j __ -I• C. _ r r- _Till ti i 11 i 1I 1 -,J-2,---f 11 Y Y- -.__1 l : 11 i 1 I , . I it t 1 �`' ,�-.: i _ {( B-20 • RESOLUTION NO. 11-62 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01012 - A REQUEST TO REPLACE 6 ANTENNAS WITH 12 ANTENNAS AND RELATED EQUIPMENT ON AN EXISTING 70-FOOT HIGH (TOP OF ANTENNAS AT 65 FEET) MONOPINE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY (ORIGINALLY APPROVED AS MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00417), LOCATED WITHIN THE RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND VINEYARD AVENUE AT 7484 VINEYARD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0209-032-02. A. Recitals. 1. AT&T Mobility filed an application for Conditional Use Permit DRC2D11-01012, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On December 14, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. 111 NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on December 14, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to an existing wireless facility that is sited within the 44-acre Red Hill Community Park, which is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue at 7484 Vineyard Avenue; and b. The subject property is zoned Open Space and Flood Control; and c. The property to the north is zoned School District and is developed with a public school; to the south and east are properties that are zoned Low Residential District and are developed with single-family residences; and to the west are properties that are zoned Office Professional and Low Residential and are developed with an adult care facility and single-family residences; and d. Section 17.26.010 of the Development Code classifies all wireless communication facilities that are located on public property as Major Wireless Communication Facilities. Section 17.26.070 states that Major Wireless facilities shall be approved by a Conditional Use Permit. The existing facility was approved by a Minor Development Review on July 2, 2002 • (DRC2002-01012), and is non-conforming under current regulations. The approval of this Conditional Use Permit will bring the site into conformance with the current regulations; and B-21 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-62 DRC2011-01012 —AT&T MOBILITY December 14, 2011 Page 2 e. The applicant proposes replacing the 6 existing antennas with 12 new antennas in • order to upgrade the facility to the latest wireless transmission technology(4G—LTE). The existing 70-foot high stealth wireless communication facility (top of antennas at 65 feet) is in the form of a pine tree. The existing facility is in conformance with the lease agreement that the applicant has with the City and the proposed changes will not require a modification of that lease agreement; and f. The new antennas are 4 feet longer than the existing antennas,though the overall height will not be increased, as the applicant is lowering the point where the antennas are attached to the trunk of the monopine by 2 feet. The changes will also include adding 12 remote radio units (RRU), two small surge suppressors, and a GPS antenna. The related equipment will be housed inside the existing fully enclosed equipment shelter, except for a small GPS antenna that will be attached to the outside of the equipment shelter. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or the improvements in the vicinity; and c. The application,which contemplates operation of the proposed use, complies with • each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, which covers the repair, maintenance, permitting and minor alterations of existing facilities. Because the project only involves adding new antennas to an existing wireless communication with no changes to the size or location of the existing equipment enclosure, staff concludes that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on his independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and the conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department: 1) Approval is granted to replace 6 antennas with 12 antennas along with minor related equipment for an existing wireless communication facility located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue (7484 Vineyard Avenue) - APN: 0207-031-33. 2) The equipment for the wireless communication facility shall be • completely housed inside the existing equipment enclosure, with the exception of one GPS antenna mounted to the fascia of the building. B-22 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-62 DRC2011-01012—AT&T MOBILITY December.14, 2011 Page 3 • 3) Paint the GPS antenna to match the fascia of the equipment shelter to which it is mounted. 4) The antennas shall be covered with branches and pine needles to blend in with the branches of the monopine. 5) All related equipment and cables shall be painted to match the trunk and branches of the monopine. 6) Print a copy of this Resolution of Approval on the plans when they are submitted for Plan Check. 7) The facility shall be maintained at all times, including making necessary repairs as needed, and keeping the site free from trash and debris. In no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 8) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 9) All appurtenant equipment shall be maintained in good condition at all times. 10) No wireless telecommunications facility shall interfere with any public safety radio communications system, including, but not limited to, the 800 MHz trunking system. The applicant shall comply with all FCC • rules and regulations regarding the avoidance, mitigation, and • abatement of any such interference. 11) The applicant shall obtain all the necessary permits from the Building and Safety Department. 12) Signs or advertising are not permitted on the wireless communication facility. 13) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Conditions, Health Departments, Uniform Building Code, or any other City • Ordinances. 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman • ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary • B-23 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-62 DRC201 1-0101 2—AT&T MOBILITY December 14, 2011 Page 4 I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, • do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • B-24 "os COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT N, DEPARTMENT MI arti!ki STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2011-01012 • SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: AT&T MOBILITY LOCATION: 7484 VINEYARD AVENUE—APN: 0207-031-33 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 4. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/ /_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No.11-62, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use _/ /_ has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. • 1 B-25 • • Project No. DRC2011-01012 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / / • site plans, architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / /_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / /_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all _/ /_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be /_/ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) D. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: / /_ a. Site/Plot Plan; • b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to / /_ the City prior to permit issuance. • 2 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2011-01012StdCond 12-14.doc B-26 • Project No. DRC2D11-01012 Completion Date E. Site Development • 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / /_ marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2011-01012). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/ /_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. F. Existing Structures 1. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be required. / /_ • • • 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2011-01012StdCond 12-14.doc B 27 • STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT L-11-111-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: December 14, 2011 • TO: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director FROM: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00612 - CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR METRO PCS - A request to collocate a Major Wireless Facility consisting of a set of antenna panels, a microwave dish, and a 12-foot by 18-foot equipment enclosure with an existing Major Wireless Communications facility mounted on a 78.5-foot high baseball field light pole in the Open Space (OS) District, generally located at the southeast corner of Heritage Community Park - APN: 1061-641-07. Related files: Minor Development Reviews DRC2002-00262 and DRC2004-00325 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01142. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. SITE DESCRIPTION: • A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Site Heritage Community Park— Open Space (OS) District/Flood Control (FC) District North - Single-Family Residences —Very Low (VL) Residential District South - Single-Family Residences —Very Low (VL) Residential District East - Single-Family Residences — Very Low (VL) Residential District West - Single-Family Residences —Very Low (VL) Residential District B. General Plan Designations: Site - Open Space and Flood Control North - Very Low Residential South - Very Low Residential East - Very Low Residential West - Very Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The subject property is the 40-acre Heritage Community Park located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Hillside Road and Beryl Avenue. The overall dimensions of the park are approximately 1,300 feet (north to south) by approximately 1,300 feet (east to west) (Exhibit C). The park is bisected diagonally from the northeast corner to near the southwest corner by Demens Creek Channel. The property is developed with park and recreational facilities owned and operated by the City. The improvements include several baseball and softball fields, equestrian facilities, multi-purpose trails with exercise stations, picnic areas, playgrounds, and large, open lawn areas. Throughout the park are numerous trees. Field lights are arranged around the baseball and softball fields. Situated generally at the southeast corner of the park is a set of wireless communication • facilities operated by two carriers. Each facility is comprised of one (1) set of antennas, mounted on two separate baseball field light poles of approximately 80 feet in height, and Item C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00612 - CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR METRO PCS December 14, 2011 Page 2 • • associated equipment shelters (Related files: Minor Development Reviews DRC2002-00262 and DRC2004-00325 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01142). The light poles on which the existing wireless facilities are mounted are located approximately 160 feet from each other. One of the poles is approximately.400 feet west of Beryl Avenue, while the other is approximately 300 feet west of Beryl Avenue. The specific location of the proposed wireless facility is the pole located closest to Beryl Avenue. This pole is approximately 350 feet from the nearest residence located at 9058 Mustang Road. The park is mostly surrounded by single-family residential development; near the southeast corner of the park across Beryl Avenue is Grace Brethren Church of Alta Loma. The zoning of the property is mostly Open Space (OS) District with the exception of the channel that is zoned Flood Control (FC) District. The zoning of the surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District. D. Background: • Section 17.26.030 of the Development Code permits Major Wireless Communications Facilities, defined as a wireless communications facility that exceeds the height limit of the district in which it is located, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Although the Open Space (OS) District does not have a height limit, Section 17.16.040 of the Code specifies that the height limit shall be determined on a site-by-site basis and consideration shall be given to surrounding properties and developments. Section 17.26.030 of the Code further states that a Major Wireless Communications Facilities may not be located within 300 feet of any existing, legally established Major Wireless Communications Facility except when the proposed facility will replace or modify an existing facility for purposes of collocation. This process also ensures that the proposal is consistent with the • objectives of the Development Code and the General Plan. If necessary, conditions may be required to provide adequate mitigation of any potentially adverse impacts. • ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant, Core Development Services on behalf of Metro PCS, proposes to install a set of antennas and microwave dish on the aforementioned baseball field light. This • equipment will be mounted directly below a set of antennas that were approved with Minor Development Review DRC2002-00262 and in the same position as the set of antennas that were approved, but never installed, with Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01142. The antennas will be mounted close to the pole, i.e. each antenna panel will be attached generally flush with the surface of the pole (Exhibits E and H). This will minimize the visibility of the installation. The light pole itself will not increase in height, and the lamps at the top of the pole will not be altered. Any changes to the pole, if necessary, will be limited to structural enhancements to allow for the addition of the antennas and the microwave dish. The antenna panels and the microwave dish will be painted to match the pole and the antennas of the existing antennas above it. In addition to the set of antennas and microwave dish, a new equipment enclosure of 216 square feet will be constructed approximately 65 feet to the southeast near the location of two (2) existing enclosures that are utilized by the other carriers. This enclosure will be constructed of a 6-foot high block wall. There will be a 3.5-foot high open wrought iron fence on the top of the wall. This enclosure will match the existing enclosures. To allow for the construction of the enclosure, four (4) trees that are 15 feet in height or less will be removed and relocated to the east side of the new enclosure (Exhibit D). • C-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00612 - CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR METRO PCS December 14, 2011 • Page 3 B. Land Use Compatibility: The project will be compatible with the development district of the site and the surrounding development districts. The property where the facility is proposed is within a developed park, and associated improvements, and because it will be a minimally visible modification to an existing wireless communications facility that is mounted on a baseball field light, the project will be compatible with the site. Its location relative to the nearby residences and the utilization of an existing wireless facility site will fulfill the screening and site selection criteria established in Section 17.26.030 of the Development Code and will be consistent with other wireless communications facilities that have been recently approved that are mounted on existing baseball field lights. The nearest residence is located at 9058 Mustang Road approximately 350 feet south of the location of the cell tower. Wireless communications facilities are expected throughout the City and are an important component of the communications network of the area which is used for personal, business, and emergency applications. Except for the purposes of maintenance, there will not be any activity on-site. The facility itself will not generate vibrations, odors, or glare, nor will the proposed facility be negatively affected by the existing on-site and/or neighboring uses. The facility will generate noise caused by the occasional, automatic operation of processes used to cool/ventilate the facility's equipment. • Staff requested that the applicant provide a noise study to determine the noise impact, if any, of these processes and any required mitigations. According to a study prepared by National Engineering and Consulting, Inc. in August 2011, the project's intermittent operational noise sources would be the same or less than the existing noise sources and would not result in substantial noise levels. Operations of the equipment would not expose pedestrians or horses/riders on the adjacent equestrian trail to excessive noise from the site and would be • less than the ambient noise levels at Beryl Avenue (Exhibit I). Therefore, staff does not expect any noise-related impacts. In the event that there are disturbances/nuisances, the Code Enforcement can be contacted to correct the problem. If necessary, the matter may be brought to the attention of the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission for further review and action. C. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Wimberly and Granger) on November 1, 2011, as a Consent Item, i.e. the design was determined by staff to be non-controversial and generally consistent with the design of similar facilities. The Committee reviewed the proposal and recommends approval to the Planning Commission as submitted. D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302, which covers the permitting of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures, and installation of small equipment and facilities in small structures. The project entails installing a set of antennas and microwave dish on an existing baseball field light of approximately 80 feet in height and constructing a new equipment enclosure. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. • C-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00612 - CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR METRO PCS December 14, 2011 Page 4 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily • Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00612 through the adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. Respectfully submitted, Jam R. Troyer, AICP Plan mg Director JRT:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Overall Site Plan Exhibit D - Detail Site Plan Exhibit E - Elevations Exhibit F - Correspondence from the Applicant Exhibit G - RF Propagation Maps Exhibit H - Photo Simulations • Exhibit I - Noise Study (excerpts) Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00612 • C-4 5 a MMOHOs .wI•ue s. NMONO ST.: - y $• s^N Ga AWR WIroEx.:'rAAA RO • � }§G 9 1 E< . DAHALLEPA DR I CT •u•.n S ! 6 S A41a('� 355 5 ^y'xgptw rNWm SI' _ HIDDFNFAPMRD. p D wow,APlR : SCnAiIONC v CARP.NIST cr- ;µp1 s !wnwS 1' I OEFN7:- CAAAN6FDR`- FIVAIMRI[I OMPMI5[i } 1...'sgT 3 [ C2Y .'RAt▪ 11-• H T SsPMG UI APPAlD05A m C 3 J .eun M a gl f e \r SHERWODD DR HARUwAr tl ▪ ROULoe yt tltl wwRUWAYC T RFPRy1 eiVISTA GROVE SL 5 g, 2 WHIRUwaYCf R l_-. Fr," 6WHIwAWAYn: icy xwsF `mat t O4°9P 0 �•DR G D [IX[x BIXDIH Lu.W OGETRG i P WrMW `x E RD x LH-� SNA LIIACI / VAGLY Vxµ.51 DHA I DA (D j. £ ¢ •Cl WW3 g' E A [GPAOD F. ..` _ 2 3Da e' VINENDAST s¢Wxww i "trams n t. 1 HILLSIDE RO V' 2 _ m Fir WRE l � e4s. p5 E luuwpx Cl s >�• • I E 5 HILLSIDE RD D _ •_ _ _ t J. w i i B .. _ HILLSIDQ RD n"� _, 7. wAT mot sr HERITAGE gq :moos, a .. a pppp 4 'LP.s.•IUW - 5 o• ' \ F9 COMMUNIII F a I PcW >I RASH 8 i5I�1AW13 rte @ MY$YOZIW r •14MHTREE0 ., u y v ! 5 PARK 3 Iouo[ACT x Y:IIa[u m,, l: D ,LAIOR P. 3 3 3SEECHxroDDOG YAv 'S'�Op '� -M alE[nWDA is °° w 'W : S 1 ARLELx 5' I i PEP q epr1� fr• g C g .`^Xi0 � D s Was ENom jF �Y �" ..EIUUERMAHI �°wACx 5 II ^"W'us 'a wRMA1�y- R ... >� _ WIL$ON AVE , _th.RM 9 WSlwo pe ks LD _ WILSON AVE ,Z - .t 1103 DR ..I• $WI159N AYE _. £, 5'-- Tc, Y - I pue0 ; II ,�HERMOSA ' 3 Gp D w200.03.¢MVwHrm el 255 5 Z IW EIO'MOb 6WAP 00 m Y < ¢ I xCPMR6f °R �n = lAG4LLr5�:fi1M / I MueAWUpw 3 nrccWw 3 m qua n p 1` .! a m;, aw CHAFFEY 88,85.“",-,./q N[LV.MILH MAIaAx11A DR fLlBNSi " ,. EIXLfMBIGfIrtn J l3 AY 11A IVNMIIA AR _ w'WmD q' 1L. COLLEGE S, • ' 6OMM 5' o I .nxM , SEVEN• ':. 3' SwHPYEP 51 =' PRApp II 41NFLT*HR ST 'i Imo..::.:.... € n c sxxdltl/•.ter @. % Q , . , 3 5PII 5 TX* I' 1' 's I I I II In//. 11 I' ;III N1 EL. s: t; E. E. _en?III_BAN,. ... met I Station g u6FxnRAr if PROJECT SITE '°' MM°'n •-- - ' - 1 c K G3 G 1 d wx4N AH 1 Y.wee.DWI 113 J ST Xe IS 'ti BANYAN i;e :Q,• 5 1 E. I: &. x.F`n- n :cRS I, E: 'f '`a`'RC .rtes ea+.¢, "fa �e ie G _-` ALTA 1 l �` - S 3Y„ 3 Ex iA E'xr.IUawdl., 5 y LOMA : .ricr t' ww...;, ..t,), �tGl .aln, ` NE'. _gram . :y, .. --- __ 9 .. :KIW6 „..,• 1'- r.„„„„451. -E¢y$p mum K sr 0....r. I� . .• € sl Lf1ID AVE � q 1 °� !:r MMES. In b 1 OPM5f 5l. °MN4F 51 42 SF MSi01 °P .)i 'S rI, I G 1j ,i. 4 hiSMEAr w� '.. : by`? I swSHS e 5 I VINEYARD E mwn i {f?£ % I /4sgs wee., 55 Y S 4 6p LNPAR °w a r,tIA OMA 4i • €LIA WM Is 4 I:- __. _ 'e G �I -r g t_.•HIGHLANDAVE :'3-L rwH Tw xvrzs •1' BBRI'LPARK xRUI AUDAVE _ �_— H i ea# �� ,434,34-s '210 re!Ire' y�5 Gnxovnk y d 5 A J I b - ' .H e/. y"` w�• PulxspRHEC GARDENS, �q s S 1 rzen ' E Klee - 'ga �- � �'PI�'pp' £• ;KM" ell pp G pAyy.^.^,.. G4 5 �1 1MLIFhXIp CT xF.1ixERS �1il Fle y i C ,WYPPVP E u C1 n '. �' a.. n Rws°5OwIW AVF SHAW`�' aJS F [ \ L 1 G SIBEEO Y1 i- 5 „ FI IH.y,p E l T ' •d. .yF 32G P' TTWr"'" �- °.$xw ,--,..7.— '4 3 90/ ! 0 uooa[s e ..=0•01 w,ai""8" 1.-_ $_ cr -I a [w, jjyq T S AVE 5 .Y.C�P I- 7 G, 5 Wx41P msl 11 n ° it'll ....,pxs .t.e ,�i 11027331: 3363# 99� P!. a ST . 3t 9 ER r FF>vawn - 1 H 7 G A DEER I' xar g ! I- m,„„• SS gg EE { ■■ gg$ I CA N F si 13 [ u. 3sr g y��RJ hA;11 AA, 1 moos-gm n 1 l' wL_ _ - �HEANLR;a 3 R 1 '6EenuA '[,w.3 sewn w'm¢n.'YICT tan s? s Cl °'j^sanov -r ,,ia . .uA, Rm wsFU { ILN+DR s FmFIX 1 L s xexoxsr VICTORIA 1ST c 5 A q'. V e33,.n e$c` �fxH•MIXLYSi $ A!am•w Sl uMrcxnn w� - t_ w MOW T 'lbws R� K4wr Mw+xsaP L pq p AVUn ST p 1 5 RR' s II y ], W CIO 107,,,2 l `� xruwwu 5• 3 'E 1 YOLOSF p&^' ;336%3E13 a^Lug ii,�MONTE St 33 uVEAxF51_co* Y wn[ i:.eaNC)1 `ASIA. 51 I" y : 6. AR 24 5¢'SMDNiE VIStA$i a S B 5 1 / y6,ryy�v 03- A*V 'S I r. LHRwF 11 M�':. wm flit 5 i G'xC / E A' 94G'q 5 ` A YC 3L: a,ulos ,F • _. G I yfp G "6I { '(y AA: 1'HM 51 ]u fF111D51 g �'4VWFSi_ 3 !�ALTA I wP �N o_ '1' UVwEDI �' WI 0501051 - 0.��.5u' Iy0 g @,,i YM:1i 5T 'I.D 4I' 513 SG a u0RMSf S, 13 LOMA 'I > p:qw -51,..6_,F.5_6_ I, 5 .ybCARNEL/AN Ii s[bw¢�I 'A D R 'd. • 7. •c w /� E 3333 Z I W. A RIn.RR 3 Im ALTA c u /�A. ,,RIe 4.M'G7�C1:C-'.'CIICCn Y' Ir IO ak LOMA a' q A LA 323 OA �.' I S 4:x.ret /W 'Aifj . . CE\ RAL.PAL�I. Ssr3 ID twuiAU r Y a 'ROS[AMS �. m 4373.3i; ,q� rzuu•.mows 2 RRI WiR S OBFBM I D •6336 nww ill 'W° A i f■ Y{'/ gpRER0551 J R' Ir H uo0l BASELINE.-ffriffLR 'P RD— YD__o p 5 '0100 5.� J�s�---.-Y —//BASEI LINE V __RD_I parq ST N -3 51 LCiDAS 5NF I ` G P SLIBRARV ' t°°H 5 Eu„,..O. S `x I I (^'tr of „, 1 € UNHIOyN _ '� 1FOrmum g `R"F- IRp 33.2 30 35 Rxw°x . •ID Rm Rwxwoms 3 5 v 5.o.se:I I�.,.,pq.E 6.4 t msus r In M• 3$ 5 51 3 rig' t' u[FP SE i 1 w pR 55 y. N.R l6" re,l/ ( § Si 71 t'S V1YMA[II RED 'ALLE i% SST _ f.51 15 5 g I Y 3 1 m 5 Sr M41 ., r'IFGYNA' f 61- t `• r/ "w 2 i° f T ^"I p °f p. RRHDD I MAAM HILL OELwwDD 5:PALO n ;ALTO Si E- . ,Ail a PALO ALTO ST E - - £Y.kCOMU E r Z s Ip ei A °4..��pRR SZp PX r GAh'�m��u 8 RH u Buv[f' PARK eusAS1 'A$ P ` BALSA- 51 � Y g 5 HA BRrSAS, A D s1 WF i i.7*,l A Y-S \IS ED. 'A t. ON. , Z F'`LAVOLOADOO� -�CUI1 MBOUIBNGA w wwly ee ,HINLfW0OS51 ar' . al < 5 E rot''''' eeENLE05 :', 3°G p XL Mtb W•gO R 1 eTIAV/ nn 05 51 „ t I C 3 51 1 vrt I CHURCI{ o s I 1:7-.4:44..e.;,:,. y RUTH F IR_ W •3[i ! 5 a H' F sr[ry 3.s I. �' YI sr STREET 9 2 3. I MUSSEM g ;S..",[D,/OHHDFH e [ IICUImCH ST I 5 s Pa18lS: 9 a , - tJ -_ 7E"-1 O$'{E LE 's' u`wa 551 u G 5 _ _ - R1 srFLal y>'L` .i A € �. 5 x £ I.wsw E g0Raslcxs I 4 ,oRS - �__ .�-/ C�C AVE rata A, &vast AAIt `\ q°y c SWl 004.„ >3 - w J D P5. wm sl 3s gx:wwa.s qH EVI. Fn at PLPr..v a Ac. n 5 "CAST ,,,o, i P� 9 7'4 t.-`vAO'a \` gF / e' I .Z "g'M P .ASnroxo ST /' s m �eororE i Lu E T Fa _ 5 Ilk�'••6 TB.oN B ` 5 "PT��+�s~6w ---co s s -, I ,SQ,Nc1 CE/Vj�Q'V r •a _ CANYON °nLI.' V E o S 55 ryE Bnvsr k I '�"'A S'y E' EEFEx ST,. <�FI,[xsr t'" p, in•gw4 `�' [s a .w { C. t EFFEN Si I 'S u POWS' md, I, RAIPIM•P siau. x` 1 r 6"s da. +1 ..SWO S PI ADI RD¢�''�g£ i. s' 45 fmw 1113 L.man II4 `� s wk s S 09Dn t§.',uc¢n II TERRA VISTA _ I ALE 1 ti ,off' +�` / ...,;PORTS 5w_ 31 e!. Station21Ml CT 4 E�>~e . H TOWN CENTER • y / CENTER: OESUtusr ., i . it_ - _ R _27; _� FOO THILL BL _. _ >.--� _ _ _ _ —_— — - HISTORIC ' 1 _ lM J T �I COURT n sn I< 11YPLAIU4U R I HOUSE LAURELS- ¢*CMYPIU$SI 1L iiemPSBIBBSI ..-ss . _1 1 ' i° I@ ucuuvn i 116623,230 66' BI __, s E 1 5 5' 5 Fis 1 !CITY d O- lI 1 1 �q "y}} g . HALL POLICE /IERI1'AGE� _ g 'DEVON. 'S II e' I 8ADE59715-T . - w s I� __ _ le _.,C/STATION 1/ NOSPITA\ � �" R a 6 I [@AEn 2MRAAyWw C >, -'(Fa YR{ EXHIBIT A ; m �wMR� ` s 8• En %IM;= . i RDA ar e E. WLE ;AFAR I• MtWFAWI W i_ FARROW ROVTf. ,-= soo _ _ - __ _ _ gm 11 ALPOIT•SENIOR W C 5 ....."'n-1- li Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00612 c: — • -, r ",,-- , --4 1 ,11\1• .. -- •1, It L - 'F. - i, .---: i -,- ' - 4 ..-‘. . - - , . iir-yme - 1 si 1 I - W• . a, . ,,r- ' I..-- - fa Ito , - .,. • II* iZ Z t ' 8,, i i NAL Oen ' - - -"," , r- ir • -Tr. , .I, 4.) teS 'C• C. 0 4 •• , r I' ' ••k• R.S4 rr 1 Si-„"' & • - ' , 'jef,1 \ t ) •■•■• = • 4hr- i;j . _,.r.,.., „..5,4-t a . ,_ rit 4 1 - '„ ji..._ v4,. . ...: .±.. _ ,Idia _- • r -- - -.-1,-(--- - 2-7g124icar'c-a- it ibilir 7- - ' 3. riLTA. -... • A ' 1 pi - . jii 4=i7 49%. . --: -,4 a •••=t-•1/2 ,e--2.tickt-• at . _ egiv 2 ‘1 tt et' ' W---* ''' - it.' a _c,.. 14- _., .....---. : •—ilig • I ' tirotd 1 ssT • • .0 1 , ..., _4,7 lit a 1 L .. ? • -- A xi, . -- # _i I - - `-- .-jels------e.„..—, a---_.- _-‘, c-L------.-- - r -) j $ e e1 no.aw I- ‘. Irtest.ry ai J.- . ,___. I. 44 ,. . ,i, 11 , I - - tei.9t, -- 1 x • N.\ -......•If.sr, 1 / i 1 '1■ 1.• • , > .e - \- \ 1 •".. 't jvir• , Pr t -- ‘ r7 -{--• i - tee - , ' 6:. . r 't, t'-- • ' • Ire '''-emilP Sk-ft-lek .„ , „c___ i 1 1 .. ' t I 1 y -, 4 1 1 11/&/' e -is -- - 4 rvt 5. ,-,..).“,..... 1 • , . . 1 . 1 . 9 met 'If ( oe. ( tir.,3:v• .. .01" p• •• . - ki -71I II tr. .. . i - , c . , a , ,f., 00" • -, --. ,.. . , _. 1,11 - t . ' 1--- . a -. 1 46. rlf-14 -, • L i ., 1 c.i .., , -11 4.... he 1 1 1 lirtiTh eq."'-1' .-v,4 ) s'. It•0 , 6-i IV ••If • i giil • • .) -1 7 , I r.,--%, . ' • ,. 1 . •• ,, ,e . d _ -., 41, .,• , t• . ,- , , • .., Project - ' MI!: e _.... ,-- _ .. • L fi V- • „.. %. -' • , A• at k 4 • ,1/4::" . ,,..: . t - - , .$ -0- •.---1 tAt YE ..ti to, 41".. tt•t7/4-- -, II , • . ,.,■.- , / • 3 r, 3.:' I - — -,_ i 1 • • i;:• E., ' 1' Co IV"? --'1' in* AN. ,-. 1 ,- ' I Alk....3/4N et - \ w-- —....10 „ye •it. .....--1 .._ , ,it •itt.4-g"4 •-•774: -4)' , -,._ ..„ iv .i:t. - ' ntaitt - 4 ' / tat.\74-19,..Lt. t 'C. 1 -•- •• ...0•44.--..---I •--'- • •.' ' al -74.'i - ' 4 4.aeffra ■ .c ' , art • '4.•,• . aa • Et 0 ,le 140kt teet- eof ' % rteKA 44' , 4 1 4P4'..„■., _La a& Ott,4 4 -044 e24 i9 ?V' 10.•. 1 tr.•ay-ri 9,?..,..: ..- .. 4 k ••t „4,4 st L,4 i 11,.% 9 ...• .4.-,4. Five,A1,sr,' . 14: - 1 41..„74im, ,.. • . it -■-•.- Nie4a1C-V1441,1% *4-tire:147 n r:ce t• PI„I'4-- t ^ i -r t .. .I. r .-,—•%i%.1. CiAxi41/0 c 4tir '. tri11 -. •• 1" •••Fcar rt .„4.4.,L•f i Icz.....elb.4" f ,II c ' -", ' .-ai 4 '''' \\S", < - A•-,, " i-1 - -i_ 13 a, tr3.--.... "`,"_.,-.),411 , .,,,,.., ar.h._ , e. .9_, ,c ;... ■-• ..7, ... • - . .1 pre-. e a I)a 1 ' ki Pk F -J.--2_ -- czr44 ) infii_sory ix? r .1 ImPr ' • t r ‘. '1• - 4 I..' - • "6 • -fr-il , i .):CL. ..C7- , C. ,ir• : :Et._ -,t,- N\ 1 , (,,• c - ... -4.;T -5. ift g c \ ire . '. - ' "ir Li ma 1 -.. it -r 1 ._ "V -. ' .•I 1 .. k r k laW ----•,-- kk Ihr OA_ , .. • Paara -. __ ___ 4 Iv ' 01 e • nif , , L. i , \ .,. •••-• eiL. , , - ..- _ , EXHIBIT B „ ...... , . a l'il 1 '\41.4>...‘ 1 - _..,7 II 6 1.. . ..-- '-' .., il. .; __. r L ,t, L J .•••• • ."•••• •••ve. ib, - a ' '.....9#2----- c- -Thl‘,- 4...c ---2, a 7.. L • til• ' .w. C-6 rill (.11 R b R li j EL— . pl 9 5 ' V I 51 .a::• ' 7- ° g ' ; I v <1 V g 21 111 1.1— ti ow It 4-4.6.1,. g 6-4 ai g .1 5 & 01 V! 0 gag?' I 1161 6 lEt- 6 . ti-0/ k (3 I:I Oil 1.. :-; O. .< 01 - "s'' g Z IF r e" g < - o . 9" 4 P,__.„.._____r__i_ LI__11Jailtil $ 9 •c; Ze tr, ® . . ...-, - —-—-—- -—- - ---- ---_-7.7iiis -J.. r-N%. • - / • -T ,, /4;° en • . ialia JP!) I e Q/ 1 • • . • ' 7.14i . • i 0 g ,. 0 I job .,,,- .r. ... L. % 2----- -- -\ — E 0 • I I ; • • 0 I . . \ .-... \ . g 11 = ,. \ \L.. %. 1 tlt , ... gt ..‘, \ , g 4 1. . I : L cal 1 \\\ I 2-I 1._____T___ \-.,'\ •.,‘, \ i N 0 I c .. ''' i . .• 0 .7* s 1.5 'S.1 I • I : ._----- CD , ., • . -,.. . ' li It •, , . . , •.. •. 1 ! ,..- e , 1 I . I . ‘.. . . . I , L.-. . TAIN3OIS38 401 IX AbOA IA I3NOZ zsa = 0 eV • IN g 1 g g i i i g Nei g rf)i€1 331ingiSgi* igl 11124 § Wiiii ngi 2 1- 0 mit iniviliti 1 1 1 oeeooeoso o 0000 9 ui x EXHIBIT C c_7 F a Y % .if 1(- col; vitro a 3 7 'I E Iii 2 till s gag N _ gF 3 � m.„. k °' z € @ a g 01, f,,,il (S� a=Q g Z. f9 13n 555 Q ��6�i yaw ; Q € � L _ w` 1 ta zd/ ' e 0 1,27 o f Z i 1 p; $ g 111 1/ a A 1, H i l 11111 oo , .( s "' 4 11 g gg 1g 25 1Y 2 °' ^ tiff 1 >0, 4 4 4I 9 9 9i @ F :I � ':: .s1 ' /,I ,-- �e ®®®®0000 rr I > O0,Mg) L --- v P t 2 I I! 2 i! i -: .------41-"-- \ , It• 2gsE'2ii1/%g222p e "1:::,:65: : t-2, P3P ¢ 5 6 ;�Gi8 ii°0 . • ®©®®000 ® ® u Q �.;. QP F0 , i P 1 - n1 ;! V . 1b f ! fg ; f e Y �P�4® *�9 Ea4' 848 $ � � � e 5 §,gial g :yy d S"yS$iQ 2 e 2 3 2 2 Ill P*Se S£ p g 2 e d¢2 p 0o°e oo N e611 S @ .i P 1;11111: EIill! z� = Z .., (pc) ® o®®®® �I Mafia r fi °yo kl`c 9 9" i � d - lilt a ee 5 4 � e e e _ "54 e s 0 EL e I;iii ie i ! ! a►: ■ae„+ira 1a11 Fa FI p Pe P-'F P P 8 + �atIC7 N1111E:i 1 i i € i 111.-_1-14 .._-.- (s a, b :_l 0;I;;d F : MIL L®O O ® e hgw 9 00 @©0(- ®® } InM -' y 1- i Ii 9 / l �vl Inilli!! O g I IIILU S C e e 0 0 0 - Q gp 3 6 g b a 'a Y Y 9$ e �\ V \ �A \ f 3� 3 22 } 5 5 ! ! 5 yP 1 pPp 2 A .. e z Fs $$9 gg 9 ~O \ \ 4, a $ . Y n I t t• a St B V I z W 000000000 Y g �9 I V° 1: II li '° Y a EXHIBIT D . C-8 d A tl Ji J • m 0. I g 1 tF1 Ww e Z g -t9 d r• ig i g o N e _� x $ s A a 'a 6 a Rater" I _� n � si E ItO: t 1 lb Q Si / :$7- rt 1 I 4 i IE Sie S3 31 ,. I1=§�f Ak :' $ ..III a 4 � kM1 _ till Ii M _ • 1. , � N b.., ill it I� ii t'• :. .s E ; ;:1 j m • S G SS c W § d lig e @ Eli Z' M G I III ` t KK Y E 1 110 a I Id I 94f, r_, H / 1I 'I n.,...........-... 2.0.........,.-2. /; i 14 9§ I 0 W ID i 11d !ire ul SG ! ,4 Pi• • ° I II ;Ii I G GQ Z EXHIBIT E C-9 : z io=i 14. s et ca SE,tnc We new standard' • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Authorized Agent ler MetroPCS Core Development Services 2903 Saturn Street,Suite H Area,CA 92821 Main:714-729-8404 Fax:711-333-4441 Web:www.core.us.com MetroPCS Project Number& Name: LA5637A—Heritage Hills ITC a it • coL )Z City of Rancho Cucamonga Application for a Conditional Use Permit Project Information and Justification • MetroPCS California, LLC(MetroPCS) is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the construction and operation of an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility (cell site),and presents the following project information for your consideration: • Project Location • Address: 5546 Beryl Street APN: 1061-641-07-0000 Zoning: OS—Open Space • Project Representative Alexander Lew,Zoning Manager • Core Development Services • 2903 Saturn Street,Suite H Brea,CA 92821 • 714-401-2241 • MetroPCS Contact Jeffrey Clarke,Site Acquisition Manager 350 Commerce,Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 714-730-3242 Project Description • MetroPCS California, LLC proposes to co-locate six(6) panel antennas and one (1) microwave dish onto an ' existing 78'-6"tall ball field light at RAD centers of 59'and 56' respectively. Rather than installing a, cylindrical shroud around the panel antennas and thereby adding additional bulk to the field light,the antennas are proposed to be flush-mounted to the light pole and painted to match the pole. Four(4) equipment cabinets, one (1)GPS antenna, and associated utility cabinets are proposed approximately 85'to the southeast adjacent to the existing T-Mobile equipment area within a new 12'x 18'equipment area. This equipment area will be constructed from CMU block and will be 6'-tall and feature an additional 3'-6"of wrought iron railing on top of the 6'-wall to match what was done for.the existing T-Mobile,equipment area. No new landscaping is proposed as the existing landscaping will adequately screen the equipment area as it . currently does with the T-Mobile equipment area. • • EXHIBIT F c ,o E-v ,rN • UEVELOPMELT.ERVICES The proposed location and design is consistent with the guidelines set forth in the City's Wireless Communications Facilities section of the municipal code. Section 17.26.030(A)(4) outlines the order of preference for the siting of wireless facilities. This facility meets both the co-location and light pole siting preference. The proposed design is also consistent with what has been approved in the past by the City as MetroPCS will be the fifth carrier at this location should this Conditional Use Permit be granted. The painting of the antennas to match the pole ensures the facility blends with the structure on which it is installed and will be less intrusive than using a cylindrical shroud. The proposed facility will not be detrimental to surrounding properties or impact the use of the park or the ball field light. The design is consistent with other approved installations at the park and MetroPCS has worked with both the Planning Department and the Parks Department in siting the antennas and equipment area. The facility will not create any hazardous materials,waste,odor, light, or glare. The equipment will not create additional noise as outdoor equipment cabinets are utilized rather than an equipment shelter which requires the installation of external air conditioning units to cool the cabinets. The facility will be unmanned, and therefore,will not create any traffic. Maintenance personnel will visit the site every 4-6 weeks to ensure the site is functioning properly and being maintained. Project Objectives and Site Selection There are several reasons why a wireless carrier requires the installation of a cell site within a specified area to close a "significant gap in coverage:" • The radio signal must be of sufficient strength to achieve consistent,sustainable,and reliable service • to customers at a level sufficient for outdoor, in-vehicle, and in-building penetration with good voice quality(Threshold,-85dBm). • When nearby other sites become overloaded,and more enhanced voice and data services are used (3G and other high-speed data services)signal contracts and a gap is created. With heavy use it is intensified due to the unique properties of digital radio transmissions. In this specific case,this location was selected because MetroPCS's RF engineers have found a gap in coverage in the vicinity north of Banyan Street,west of Amethyst Avenue. The area currently lacks in- building coverage and has pockets lacking in-vehicle coverage as depicted in the included RF propagation maps. The City's wireless code promotes these types of installations as it eliminates the need to construct a new standalone structure for the antennas. Fortunately this ball field light co-location opportunity meets MetroPCS' RF coverage objectives and as proposed represents the best design solution for this application. GENERAL INFORMATION Site Selection Customer demand drives the need for new cell sites. Data relating to incomplete and dropped calls is gathered,drive-tests are conducted, and scientific modeling using sophisticated software is evaluated. Once the area requiring a new site is identified,a target ring on a map is provided to a real estate professional to begin a search for a suitable location. • Page 2 C•11 i t r :. LE • i `: V EL:)PMEME I41 EEn`!!CES During an initial reconnaissance, properties for consideration for the installation of a cell site must be located in the general vicinity of the ring,with an appropriate zoning designation, and appear to have enough space to accommodate an antenna structure and the supporting radio equipment. The size of this space will vary depending on the objective of the site. The owners of each prospective location are notified to assess their interest in partnering with MetroPCS. Four key elements are considered in the selection process: • Leasing: The property must have an owner who is willing to enter into a long-term lease agreement under very specific terms and conditions. • Zoning: It must be suitably zoned in accordance with local land-use codes to allow for a successful permitting process. • Construction: Construction constraints and costs must be reasonable from a business perspective, and the proposed project must be capable of being constructed in accordance with local building codes and safety standards. . . • RF: It must be strategically located to be able to achieve the RF engineer's objective to close the significant gap with antennas at a height to clear nearby obstructions. The Benefits to the Community Approximately 90-percent of American adults subscribe to cell phone service. People of all ages rely • increasingly on their cell phones to talk,text,send media, and search the Internet for both personal and business reasons. More and more,they are doing these things in their homes,therefore, becoming reliant on adequate service within residential neighborhoods. In fact,50-percent of people relocating are not signing up for landline service at their new location and are using their cell phone as their primary communication method. The installation and operation of the proposed facility will offer improved: • Communications for local,state, and federal emergency services providers,such as police,fire, paramedics, and other first-responders. • Personal safety and security for community members in an emergency, or when there is an urgent need to reach family members or friends. Safety is the primary reason parents provide cell phones to their children. Currently 25%of all preteens, ages 9 to 12,and 75% of all teens,aged 13 to 19, have cell phones. • Capability of local businesses to better serve their customers. • Opportunity for a city or county to attract businesses to their community for greater economic development. • Enhanced 911 Services (E911)—The FCC mandates that all cell sites have location capability. Effective site geometry within the overall network is needed to achieve accurate location information for mobile users through triangulation with active cell sites. (Over half of all 911 calls are made using mobile phones.) Safety—RF is Radio The FCC regulates RF emissions to ensure public safety. Standards have been set based on peer-reviewed • scientific studies and recommendations from a variety of oversight organizations, including the National Page 3 C-12 text, DFVFLOt'MCN?-S @°V::7ES • Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements(NCRP), American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers(IEEE), Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), Federal Drug Administration (FDA),Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Although the purview of the public safety of RF emissions by the FCC was established by the Telecommunications Act of 1996,these standards remain under constant scrutiny. All MetroPCS cell sites operate well below these standards, and the typical urban cell site operates hundreds or even thousands of times below the FCC's limits for safe exposure. MetroPCS Company Information In December of 2005,the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)granted MetroPCS a license for radio wave bandwidths to provide wireless phone service in the greater Los Angeles area. The MetroPCS system operates on a Block C frequency with antennas transmitting on a 1985-1990 MHz bandwidth and receiving on a 1905-1990 MHz bandwidth. As a licensee authorized by the Federal Communications Commission to provide wireless services in this region, MetroPCS must establish a network of wireless communication facilities in the metropolitan Los Angeles area and beyond. MetroPCS services are commercially available in Atlanta, Detroit, Portland,San Francisco, Philadelphia, Las Vegas, Sacramento, Miami and Tampa. For a pre-assessed,single payment monthly fee,MetroPCS provides non-contract, unlimited anytime local and long distance wireless phone service to its customers. MetroPCS • launched this new wireless phone service in the greater Los Angeles area in September 2007 and continues to expand its network throughout Los Angeles,Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino,and Ventura counties to fully develop its Southern California network. The proposed facility described herein will provide high quality, low cost wireless communications services to subscribers living and working in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The enclosed application is presented for your consideration. MetroPCS requests a favorable determination and approval of the Conditional Use Permit to build the proposed facility. Please contact me at (714)401- 2241 for any questions or requests for additional information. • Respectfully submitted, - Alexander Lew Authorized Agent for MetroPCS • Page 4 C-13 V 0 01 71) ' .. I- • .,. Ai 11._&1031 --• CD 1 111:42,0", - *- cr c ca.„ • ma, • III 2 P. 440, „di ' .i. elk, ,-- L ibit lig 1 A"l'" 1,' ' C II *: ,-, E iticil-r _ ..,... r_ r- .a iii ii • OM._ Ell iNi. Jo_ ; 111 o II a ....-:, ,. „.... .a- W Iihrifil Pli r limo,CC 1 e °iliclh. •W ■ T cc. it I • ta L . , , _, . 43.) iii • Air- IIPPrzy .jai eD' r O CI) IfF4 1 m 1 I 4 yrd . .. Sapphirgt v _ T - :4 ■ lit JP CD ill* .. dii i CL E E E 0o iea c 1 . .s. - c d C 1:11 4) .4111i) fl! 1'L ea 2 DD ® EXHIBIT G C-14 — -70 n___ • • • .--- — - - . 11 :14 .- I Clat 14LIMMT1 = 0 r: ' r fny uaq '� L 0 . I Ilf 6 .1 , , .1 sr 7_/I 0 ° ' ‘fresi uil fiiiii I . A . a Raft . I i• ri NI Ili , • -z.- ..- 't . . '' 'i 1.1 ex i . t .• - d . II C A .L z II JO P ! t ' - •r .,.. i 1 Iiiii i xiilif 0 1 *II/ la in, 0 1... i lit. I -it L a 1.1filt F.'.24,....7=' 1 t • •'' - I o el • • e.. •r ' .. i e ,. C. CO di J n 1 . 0 O i 0 .. . 1— y tiiio.i'lli ; V,_, tz ' . ? S Iur:64 `.mss III 111171.1:31‘. lin K ... ..„, a :al . t V dr ',a% - m m m 15 13 1:3 co is o (1.) II CI 911 4$ 1 Xv.• . i C4 ••a yr;F tE` d m ; 'G Ca, c = 0 • es 200E C-15 U ` • *N.- — . 11 - lia 1 � .1 , 1 0 Ica J t� • ill: 0 , v/ oil.. • 1 • �!RR ..w 1.0 0 rliplir * 1� ■ i! L I . L E a 1..„. . 0 1 y • 'jam Fill 71 1 jf ._, •...... ■ iiiiitat . Z I ri it. 4N it Pilir • r 0 . Off • -_ AIL.t_i_ Il_A . Ls • .. Ow doc y 7 r1 11• a • VII • - 1 • 0 :. I A .r• 1.l G 1 n ' N rs illli + ■ i 1 t g. ,•. ' r t %. • WOiii 14 N ti 0 • 1 1 uug.�. ., I i i 'f } i 1 1.•a q ■ i : eSt •17 � ,1 1 = � ■ 5 NI WmonErs"e ..4. rSi) .,. .t. ..., . I .41 a • A • .., 1 r r 1 0 Ilirl E E co 11101,111, - co aa `.4 . $ rz m co 4, .._... ... , 10 . � 1 w 2 .g. T., h. . CL "IF ) V = d = 0 ra 2 ❑ ❑ ® C-16 . ... .. . . .. : — ... „...-, .. . 1 iii .6 g -..,.?'• -: [MIL'- •C.co ,- ,"-e----' 5 . : I . . • . - - ,..... ..-„-_ 5 ,.., • t„ _ / . i..,. ... I . .. _.. ,..„„ . ,. "T- • . ' . g : 5 • .N . - ....,--,..• • 4 .kiP i •-•••• ...-.,. . ■ ...,..* ! ....:e ..- i....;,1 z. - -- , • , • sr a .•.,.. .. m - N -• . 1 0 L • . . . i B er P77-: . ■ A 0 1. i • c• - . cri . , • . . 1 • , ..,'4 , ::.•:. ._..:...,;r:. --.4 0 < < 0 ri • : - At'ffil. "7"''.....?'..tre;',terr:41h1....14;is-s' , 'T.-•••.4.14,•••-,,.....0.In- -. .1".1 1 M . '. '—.re.V 4.i'•••'. t" - -" 0 • , 0 • ,,, As ...eik:;., • 0 ' D t 2 < U .., 0 , ... o ' a ..• 4 v. ... . F . . ,. .• . f . z ir . a -,- .,i---.--- ......_-,---- ..- • ,_ , - ....,.!!._-i.-k--.1.-.-.-.' -,-.." -r.., , . • , z .,, i . u rri LIJ w cia 0 1- u) • ..•4" ..,.-, /.."'•--•,,••.-...t.-' .-. '• . < J , e " nit' - . .. — . — • N, 1 1.0 , . -- • . - . - •' :.4 . , „ r—,........_,.._— .. i i•4 . It 42 - .._44..,--_ .': •. ' -.... ., _- 7. t..-. .',.1 . I i,. , .., i, • .-.....n i- - • ...,/ • i . - . . • .i ,. -4.• 7 l t • ' ....01•11 :1L$H. 4441'44 4 I,' et . - / A • . ,i..,1„,. . —• IS■,..,;. •" .',.....-'. . nt , ... c., . ••. • '0 Tr. .. :tit . . 4.:444%141- . .= c./1 - " • ' •••■ • ...m..4 r 7.... I, -,•.4:.,' .I . • - -- . 0, ,„•.. L- •C ..." ,,. a . .11(441"' ' . . ' 1 t• • : L. 1 --,., , ,. •... _,.- „..,. -0,.. -.. , 1 f , . I C : I • ., .: •, - ; " (S'• 7 , 1 .'. . .eurmiss , . , EXHIBIT H , 4 ,Oa... •- .. . ■ r, Vi.. _%., • .....' Al .. ... r.;:-='."..-,..it _._ _..•......_ ,...,.. _.. - C-1 7 — • . . __, .__ . 3 . . Ci.i. = g a = ' *Iir---------"74; _ •?I.4 ,--so -• 1 i i :: ,.., :::: '',,:, /3'ac IA...., tiii.4,441. ..._....... C4 A:Fi ' :', l'. Ill/L . , CC. :.1r. ,,,....-.-• i,..:. . • - . .9, 2 z • 2. ••- • I g i s 4 1.. . . • s • i Z • . . 14 ... 2 . w la , 0 . c C r. 0 1 —i°1 .., fq . I- z t". n IT 0 < r u u . . , ' < < .11 • 'Ablit. •-:-- t .'elf•-.• , ',.. - r 1 Z (3 • . ,- - •Tym, . . lit • • . , r n W 7 I I < U c . . ,•1'. . .. . . . 1 0 re 4 1 En 0 . . .., ■ I , '3 < 1 a . . • ■ 13 41111 • , •US 4 P. LI bit . • Z ii w . • o o LE/ 1 w (11 i 0 to 1 . • • ,,,,-.. .. • •••• .. ‘`It < -1 •• .•'.,-t-1,• [n ! 1— 1 ..,,I. • r — 11 • I Ni,„„or. I ry ED .; ',... ., , %.., ri, „ ! La 0 . - . . I 1 . .,: ,,.' •• . • __ in . c 4.,..; g 1 IV .;.1- ' •' . ! I . . . . ••, ' , •.-. . ,„1.44'. 7-, t . . . . s• --• •' .me M.,),•Yara t' 4e. • ..) I ti• 1 ■'<,. .il, . . .. c , . . ; tf • :::1 4. Pi il 40,.; - - i • , •1.-• I -• E.r.' .c •■ - ' : „, •-40. '•• .. ' i . r..4.\. .. ..: L•i..,,,._ C'I i". f r_ C. -01 ,.• ' ,var. 'at ; • .• - , g... 41..".1 •- ;./1 411,-;It, E • i s■-.k%4*, . . , L.' sh• I • i 1 '' . - • INI;J: .. r.--- r. . -44 i • ; . • ,-. _ .._ .. -'4:11 • t i 1.•-. , ro • . .• • . ,,...... , . z 1... .§. . . P.... V.. r„i. - ,.. . ' -11 t i -.,;46•A.7.,A, - , --: -:,. ,....# • . ' .‘•"' 't .r''' '+' . • III A - • 113 I .I ...-. . . ....a • , '11 P . . ... .. LI ....i ,. ! ,i'' " - f' a. .. 0, svi• .. - v. ., .... -. .. ..„.. ... :'. -.4„.. •,. . 4...4, .,„ ' ...,..„.1... .:...., ',,., *•••••,;- •; A : ..._— C-IS - UI g 4i, . • • , as r3" -r,•,• ,;,..t. I , V5, .e FA • ' t „. . i 1 - . ..._ . . ..,- = CZ . t' . ". —.•. ii e. I- , / 1 :. '.. I . 111 • T- 1 Z . I Z kl . F . Z 1g 0 < .... I 0 ... t , . w • t el .. . a ,- V • 1 • 0 2 t t Altk"all' I , < . 4 re "-,... ''.4111111 a el o • r" -- I , • „.. .._-. 0) 7 1.....,7,7;1:'-i . • / 9).... • .' I < 0 ': t 4111111-) IJ 0 . •'.at t i I-r re la < :.4 •', lif:,••":yip X 1.1 J I U 0 X c0r1)1 <[LLI 9 O i 0a-F t0" I j 1 1 .r, - '! .." a in z 2 a i a k .... Lo '.1. ' ■it a . _ ......•_....•_......._...... . , . --t• s, ., , . . -.irc, , I ,vt.t-„. ...,, — ...,,. IT . :1-- ...„_. . ...„.„ - i .•- ' - I . ■ 2: ..• . 4.- ..., --T--- ---- ' ..• ... C•J I'',' ■ ' 0 . ct • • ''''.i ' . .. ! ) . .., . . Cel. ti • .,-_ . — - I .t.1 4 1 ...._ (P ,-Iii - . ..._, . . I .* ' LIZCI 4 Z* Z .• ....41 14 ..,.., ,. ,,., - c. • I •I" . : - , - 1114. .11,. ■ Er! . t ...".s.1 •IL : . , . .... (: •{ ...of ,r •4 J , ,— .. .. ., \.....•,,.... . . ....... 411i3 • -, _ ' ' . ..e., ' N'fik, ,{, • ..-. -7 1,. ' ._• ' ' •-,'• t, e' 4. \ N.:11k,MI• - , ,,, * • .•i 1...t. ' .."Ar . • \, .,..' • . 1 4,.... ' -- .. . ., C-19 . ; v ' 1-.7 gas-v- • ••••...-k., .., .r.:,-,174 r;..Y30-4.."4, - - - 1 -• - ' -'1Sarg . — --tti-411r- . .• .: c E ...r. , .... ,,..1, 1.. - if-(-, 1". •• ••'•40'••A.-40.---; A ".• th idd . a r4.. — ',et ..,::- 1;41, ,E Z . :-.-- .1 .f. 4, is ,.' 46, 0. . i * r. i .7 , , z z • Jr••••,. .....y .,..,- .,........ -• — :.; 1.. h.g i'i r.-:. w i CC ,..-. ; ,....14:11.4:4 -:,..5-0F.Y' . 4.7,`•, . 4 g CV- . i " ,., e • . •.... 0 . . 5 0 • ' :'..• ,• -,- ' e. D , . , ..,••.7, • . • , 1 • - •. -WE • 1 A le .., {._....,__,, , ____ ._,...__......,...........4161 . ,. , ,• :.•••• ra _it • . ,-:,• A ..c... , - -J,-,-- 0.. c•f-r. • 0 • ..I t ' ..•44 ZI r '''' . a ' D ,...'"51 r . " 2 PI ..4.,,, '14 : -,,p.., 7 . ‘...,•tr....- -t.,---le;.!., ty, - ; 4 r. w L3 ,-44-1''jr ..-- 4 0 • 1..- •-;,•• " ' . .14, ., , , .. ._ . ,,.4.1.„, . ... c...,.. Ace ...-0,. .•( 0 1 < • 0 7 U til 0 :ji i 1' — < -pt.e,_:: . ,\ ts. ....._. _ .- - . . ., ..... .r b. F ..la r N 1 rt , .' 0 F ,"4...... ii W ._.,.. 714 'I+. • ' ...... a 0 19 F If/ . .ti•-, .." .4... .. .. . . . .. . - . ..1 -, Lr) W ! I- . r- . . ,..„4„......„ . , .r ...'41• _ am -7, , - • .r 4. . ., .._4ii; ‘e!•• ILI . ••• • ,. tn . _ . . -..• ..1;„ : . ,. , 1•' -., .. . .1. 1 . :.,...• ,...„" • ... . , - J. .: •• ---. . . _ , • L . .. - t,..,.„:„, --- _ i , „ . •••■•••%' ■ . ,• ' l 1 ,a....., , tor t - -- .m.-• , Q.) 3 4V,•e..,,„..:,i- t 1 , , ... , . • ' -e....•=•:.. . ; 11.•1-.. 4::•,I, .," .... . a • 1,.I • 0.- , ,......,. . .11 ,... •- •-,\\Lik.FE.:i)ct-p__ ( ri..... . J., 4 ...., . • : , . .... .E... er i. r _ -au • • i 0 ••• t. -.. ....',1• ' .9;*le it: i :1.•ittk_1\-c,■II, ..411111-, , '' } '',,e 1.• •..•,. '. 't ' s' -'. , • . , •• , 110 No,z -1. --- ,.• .• .... , .P.----• ,.. ' .'■•''''7' • ":;.-.... - •• 1"4 l.A j''.4..,i i •• \\ .'".... ." ‘.1!• ,• 4.• '.•••..•4•7a-•..•l.•• •.' -:..•• ••••-••••'. I • . :' 'lb' ; -''' ' ' ' ' •11‘44,.'- - . . • Acoustical Analysis Report DRC2011-00612 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • National Engineering and Consulting Inc., (NEC) has prepared this noise analysis report for a Minor Development Review, DRC 2011-00612, for CORE Development Services proposed wireless addition, evaluating operational noise impacts associated with the operation of the facility. The noise analysis report also includes an evaluation of construction noise and vibration to sensitive land uses located within the vicinity of the proposed expansion. The project site is located at the southeast corner of Heritage Community Park and Equestrian Trail along Beryl Street, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The on-site acoustical measurement indicates that no significant noise impacts have been identified with implementation of this project. The intermittent noise generated by the air- conditioning units would not expose pedestrians or horse and rider, along the adjacent equestrian trail, to excessive noise from the site. There will be a limited number of service vehicles, which ea would not substantially increase the existing noise level in the project vicinity, and the traffic noise level increase is considered less than significant. Lastly, construction noise and vibration would comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's noise and vibration criteria, and the noise and vibration impact would be less than significant. 1.0 INTRODUCTION NEC has prepared this noise study in response to comment I A.1 of DRC 2011-00612 (proposed • project), evaluating noise impacts associated with the operation of the wireless facility adjacent to the equestrian trail, as well as on-site construction noise and vibration. This analysis is based on the proposed project's site plan, preliminary construction equipment list, and on-site measurements as requested by the City planning department. References used in this report are presented in Appendix A. Sound measurement data are included in the enclosed Tables.. 1.1 Project Description The proposed project is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the southeast corner of Heritage Community Park and Equestrian Center, adjacent to Beryl Street in Western San Bernardino County. The regional and project vicinity maps are included as Figures 1 and 2. The proposed project includes the construction of a set of antenna panels, a microwave dish and a 12'x 18' equipment enclosure to an existing Major Wireless Communications facility. The only source of noise will come from within the enclosure where the equipment is housed. The new equipment is state of the art and requires limited ventilation/air-conditioning, unlike the 2 • NATIONAL nNCINEERINO a CONSVlnNO.INC. EXHIBIT I C21 Acoustical Analysis Report DRC20I 1-00612 levels created do not exceed the noise standard of 65 dBA plus the limits specified in Section 17.02.120-D-1. • 5. All devices, apparatus or equipment associated with agricultural operations provided: a. Operations do not take place between 8 p.m. and 7 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, or b. Such operations and equipment are utilized for protection or salvage of agricultural crops during periods of potential or actual frost damage or other adverse weather conditions, or c. Such operations and equipment are associated with agricultural pest control through pesticide application, provided the application is made in accordance with permits issued by, or regulations enforced by, the California Department of Agriculture 3.2 Potential Operational Noise Impacts (Non-Construction Noise) On-Site Noise Impacts fThe project's operational noise sources would continue to be the same or less than the existing noise sources. These noise sources primarily consist of the ventilation/cooling process of the equipment and closing of car doors, and starting engines, when the service technician arrives. These activities would not result in substantial noise levels and would be less than the ambient noise level associated with Beryl Street. Thus, the noise impact would be less than significant. ea Off-Site Noise Impacts . • This phase was not addressed since it is limited during construction. 3.3 Potential General Construction Noise Impacts Construction at the site would consist of limited, grading, and facility construction activities. The project's construction activities are summarized as follows: Grading. Grading would consist of removal of a limited amount of soil (so limited that Public Works does not require a grading permit)This phase would last for approximately maximum of 2 days. Equipment would most likely consist of a skip loader and dump truck. Less than 50 cubic yards of materials would be removed from the site. Construction offacilities. Facility construction would consist of installation of a new 3-7 foot high cmu wall with a wrought iron fence, to match existing, relocation of the existing trees the construction of a concrete slab and installation of the units on the slab. This process may last 4 weeks. Equipment would most likely consist of a compact roller, skip loader and dump truck. • 17 NATIONAL ENCINPBNINO 1.CONBVLTNC.INC. • C'22 RESOLUTION NO. 11-63 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00612 - CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR METRO PCS - A REQUEST TO COLLOCATE A MAJOR WIRELESS FACILITY CONSISTING OF A SET OF ANTENNA PANELS, A MICROWAVE DISH, AND A 12-FOOT BY 18-FOOT EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE WITH AN EXISTING MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY MOUNTED ON A 78.5-FOOT HIGH BASEBALL FIELD LIGHT POLE IN THE OPEN SPACE (OS) DISTRICT GENERALLY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERITAGE COMMUNITY PARK;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF— APN: 1061-641-07. A. Recitals. 1. Core Development Services, Inc., on behalf of Metro PCS, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00612, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of December 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on December 14, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the 40-acre Heritage Community Park located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Hillside Road and Beryl Avenue; The overall dimensions of the park are approximately 1,300 feet (north to south) by approximately 1,300 feet (east to west); b. The property is developed with park and recreational facilities owned and operated by the City. The improvements include several baseball and softball fields, equestrian facilities, multi-purpose trails with exercise stations, picnic areas, playgrounds, and large open lawn areas. Throughout the park there are numerous trees. Field lights are arranged around the baseball and • softball fields; C-23 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-63 DRC2011-00612 - CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. FOR METRO PCS December 14, 2011 Page 2 c. Situated generally at the southeast corner of the park is a set of wireless • communication facilities operated by two carriers. Each facility is comprised of one (1) set of antennas, mounted on two separate baseball field light poles of approximately 80 feet in height,and associated equipment shelters; d. The light poles on which the existing wireless facilities are mounted are located approximately 160 feet from each other. One of the poles is approximately 400 feet west of Beryl Avenue,while the other is approximately 300 feet west of Beryl Avenue. The specific location of the proposed wireless facility is the pole located closest to Beryl Avenue; e. The park is mostly surrounded by single-family residential development; near the southeast corner of the park across Beryl Avenue is Grace Brethren Church of Alta Loma; f. The zoning of the property is mostly Open Space(OS)District with the exception of the channel which is zoned Flood Control (FC) District. The zoning of the surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District; g. The proposal is to install a set of antennas and microwave dish on the aforementioned baseball field light pole. This equipment will be mounted directly below a set of antennas that were approved with Minor Development Review DRC2002-00262 and in the same position as the set of antennas that were approved, but never installed, with Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01142; h. In addition to the set of antennas and microwave dish, a new equipment enclosure of 216 square feet will be constructed approximately 65 feet to the southeast near the location of two • (2) existing enclosures that are utilized by the other carriers; i. The antennas will be mounted close to the pole, i.e. each antenna panel will be attached generally flush with the surface of the pole. The light pole itself will not increase in height, and the lamps at the top of the pole will not be altered. Any changes to the pole, if necessary, will be limited to structural enhancements to allow for the addition of the antennas and microwave dish; j. The completion of this project will allow Metro PCS to increase/enhance its coverage for its customers; k. The facility will generate noise caused by the occasional, automatic operation of processes used to cool/ventilate the equipment of the facility. According to a noise study prepared by National Engineering and Consulting, Inc., the intermittent operational noise sources of the project would be the same or less than the existing noise sources and would not result in substantial noise levels. Operations of the equipment would not expose pedestrians or horses/riders on the adjacent equestrian trail to excessive noise from the site and would be less than the ambient noise levels at Beryl Avenue. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Although the Open • Space (OS) District does not have a height limit, Section 17.16.040 of the Code specifies that the height limit shall be determined on a site-by-site basis and consideration shall be given to the C-24 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-63 - DRC2011-00612 - CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. FOR METRO PCS December 14, 2011 Page 3 • surrounding properties and developments. The proposed project is a collocation of a new wireless facility with an existing wireless facility on baseball field light pole that is approximately 80 feet high— the height limit within the surrounding Very Low (VL) Residential District is 35 feet. Facilities in excess of this height are permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. As the facility is located within 300 feet of an existing, legally established Major Wireless Communications Facility, it is required to comply, and fulfills, the site selection criteria which specifies that such facilities must be a replacement or modification of an existing facility for the purposes of collocation. The underlying General Plan designation is Open Space. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is within the 40-acre Heritage Community Park located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Hillside Road and Beryl Avenue; the proposed land use is consistent with the existing land use and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the park is mostly Open Space (OS) District with the exception of the channel that bisects the park which is zoned Flood Control (FC) District. The zoning of the surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. • 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302, which covers the permitting of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures, and installation of small equipment and facilities in small structures. The project entails installing a set of antennas and microwave dish on an existing baseball field light of approximately 80 feet in height and constructing a new equipment enclosure. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the collocation of a Major Wireless Facility consisting of a set of antenna panels, a microwave dish, and a 12-foot by 18-foot equipment enclosure with an existing Major Wireless Communications facility mounted on a 78.5-foot high baseball field light pole in the Open Space (OS) District, generally located at the southeast corner of Heritage Community Park—APN: 1061-641-07. 2) The wireless communication facility and the equipment enclosure shall • be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file with the Planning Department. The antenna panels shall be mounted flush with the surface of the light pole and painted to match the color of the pole. C-25 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-63 DRC2011-00612 - CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. FOR METRO PCS December 14, 2011 Page 4 The enclosure shall match the design (materials, finish, and color) of the existing equipment enclosures used by the other wireless communications carriers. 3) Any expansion, modification, or alteration to the baseball field light pole or equipment enclosure shall require review and approval by the Planning Department. 4) The wireless facility shall operate in conformance with the performance standards as identified in the Development Code. If the operation of the wireless facility causes adverse effects upon the adjacent land uses or operations,this Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission for further review and action. 5) The wireless communication facility is considered abandoned if it ceases to provide wireless communication service for 180 or more days and shall be removed in accordance with the proper health and safety requirements and all ordinances, rules, and regulations of the City. 6) Any work performed or any right-of-way closure will require prior approval from the Engineering Department. 7) All equipment necessary for the operation of the wireless facility shall • be contained inside the equipment enclosure. 8) Signs are not permitted on the baseball field light pole or the equipment enclosure, except signage required for emergency notification purposes and those required by regulatory agencies. 9) The antennas, microwave dish, and the equipment shelter shall be maintained in good condition at all times. Damaged and/or weathered equipment, including appurtenant equipment, shall be repaired promptly. 10) No wireless communication facility shall interfere with the public safety radio communications system including, but not limited to,the 800 MHz . trunking system. If it is determined that the operation of the telecommunications facility causes interference with the radio communications of the City's public safety operation in violation of FCC Rules and Regulations, the applicant shall work diligently in accordance with the Best Practices Guidelines of the FCC to eliminate any interference. 11) Except for necessary emergency maintenance, maintenance of the wireless communication facility and all appurtenant equipment on any day, except on Sundays, shall occur only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. On Sundays, maintenance shall occur only • between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. C-26 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-63 DRC2011-00612 - CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. FOR METRO PCS December 14, 2011 Page 5 • 12) Parking of any maintenance vehicles or equipment on the Community Trail is prohibited. Only the area labeled as"Unpaved Road" on Sheet LS-2 may be used for maintenance vehicles. 13) A lease agreement is required in order to activate the Conditional Use Permit. Engineering 1) Return the site to the present condition if equipment damages any property. Building and Safety CELL EQUIPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S). 1) Submit five complete sets of plans Submit two sets of structural calculations. 2) Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. • 3) Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4) Operations shall not commence prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division. 5) Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 6) Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Lou Munoz, Jr., Chairman • ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary C-27 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-63 DRC2011-00612 - CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. FOR METRO PCS December 14, 2011 Page 6 I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, • do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • • C-28 :=Trk COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2011-00612 SUBJECT: CONDITONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. FOR METRO PCS LOCATION: HERITAGE COMMUNITY PARK —APN: 1061-641-07 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date A. General Requirements • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its /_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 11-63, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use / /_ has not commenced within 5 years from the date of the approval. No extensions are allowed. • 1 C-29 • Project No. Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ • site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. • • • 2 C30 STAFF REPORT Planning Department Date: December 14, 2011 CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission UCAMONGA From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Subject: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (NON-CONSTRUCTION) DRC2011- 00990 - BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS -A request to modify Conditional Use Permits DRC2007-00258 and DRC2007-00258U to increase the hours of operation Monday through Wednesday and on Sundays and add additional arcade games at a sit-down restaurant located at 12375 Base Line Road, Suite 101, in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Planned Community at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 0227-161-58. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the permitting of existing structures. SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: • Site - Building A of the Winery Estates Center/Mixed Use - Victoria Community Plan North - Single-Family Residences/Low-Medium Residential -Victoria Community Plan South - Single-Family Residences/Mixed Use - Victoria Community Plan East - Fillipi Winery/High Density Residential - Victoria Community Plan West - Vacant 40-Acre Parcel/Regional Related Office/Commercial District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site — Mixed Use North - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Mixed Use East - High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) West - Commercial C. Site Characteristics: Buffalo Wings & Rings is located within the Winery Estates commercial center in Building A at the northeast corner of the center. The tenants in the center include Sprouts • Farmers Market, Bank of America, and Tio's Mexican Restaurant, as well as a variety of smaller retail shops and service businesses. • ANALYSIS: A. Background: Buffalo Wings & Ring's original Conditional Use Permit (Non-Construction) DRC2007-00258 was approved on May 22, 2007. The Conditional Use Permit permitted the applicant to operate a bar selling distilled spirits in conjunction with a sit-down restaurant. The Resolution of Approval limited'the serving of alcoholic beverages to the approved hours for operation of the restaurant, which were Monday through Thursday from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., • Friday and Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to midnight, and Sunday from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. • Item D • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00990 — BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS December 14, 2011 Page 2 On February 10, 2009 (DRC2007-00258M), the Planning Director approved the applicant's request • to extend the approved hours of operation from 11:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., Monday through Wednesday; from 11:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. on Thursdays; and from 12:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. on Fridays and Saturdays. A Condition of Approval was included with that modification which requires Planning Commission approval for any additional increase in the hours of operation. B. Entitlement Request: The applicant is requesting to modify their existing Conditional Use Permit to extend the hours of operation on Monday through Wednesday from 12:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. and on Sundays from 10:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. (earlier opening time) and 10:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. (later closing time). The applicant is also requesting to have up to 9.standing and 8 table top arcade games. The Development Code classifies a business with over 3 arcade games as an arcade (17.10.030), which requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The standing arcade games will be located adjacent to entrance of the restaurant, and the table top games will be scattered around the restaurant and in the bar area. The applicant feels that extended hours and additional arcade games are necessary to better serve their existing clientele and increase the economic viability of the business. C. Use Description: Buffalo Wings & Rings is a restaurant specializing in Buffalo-style chicken wings and curly fries. The casual-style restaurant offers sit-down table service in a leased space of approximately 4,030 square feet in area, and in a 300 square foot outdoor patio area on the west side of the building. D. Public Safety Review: The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department ran a call-for-service check for the applicant's address for the past 6 months of operation which came back with only a few calls for employees accidentally setting off the alarm system of the restaurant and an employee theft. Staff finds that these police calls-for-service are very minor and not excessive for a full-service restaurant with a bar and, therefore, believe there are no public safety concerns at this time. E. Land Use Compatibility: Staff does not believe that the proposed changes will negatively affect the existing businesses in the center, as the majority of the businesses close at 9:00 p.m. or earlier, and the arcade games will be closely monitored by the staff of the restaurant. F. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project entails increasing the operating hours and adding arcade games at an existing restaurant with no expansion or changes to the existing building. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that there will only be an increase in the operating hours and no expansion of the structure. The Planning Director has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: Because of the additional request for the expanded arcade use, this item was • re-advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff has not received any letters or phone calls expressing concern over the Conditional Use Permit. D-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00990 — BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS December 14, 2011 • Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00990 to extend the hours of operation and add additional arcade games at an existing sit-down restaurant through the adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. Respectfully submitted, Jam R. Troyer, AICP Plan Director JRT:TV/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Center Site Plan Exhibit B - Floor Plan Exhibit C - Photographs of Interior and Exterior of the Business Exhibit D - Winery Market Place Tenant List and Hours of Operation Exhibit E - Applicant Letter Requesting Increased Hours of Operation Exhibit F - Resolution of Approval 09-02, dated February 10, 2009 Exhibit G - Resolution of Approval 07-12, dated May 22, 2007 Draft Resolution of Approval for Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00990 • • D-3 . .� = U ❑ m [. U 2 Vo m m L 6 °° .o m e° m J '1 ry m ? Cl m G' 9 -.I J m 1 i e m N >')'00 °OO n00m 9N •nrv0NQ iO tr- Q' 7 - Co mr 6 tb Q-ry m N ern rv_Je, Er-: 9��_Pa. Sia D o.o E74' 52, " '?, °- a r u 5 d ^ . , d _ i v , =_ ,,- u ,-,, nI Coo Z ° '= Y ° u .o u u u u u w ` a O '_ _ > ,n r >.!J z N m r ry Vl 9 ;+. LSI _- T < - m- ° ° o 0 0° o o c m o o o°o O m O_ °o -- - s° ,t.r - v S - - > m m„ u 4: v= n y 9_ ,on ,f' M LU r W �>+ i L CC it mS VI Vl r 9 r VI • ti r t--- (,) N j 0 V • OQ4 4elp�4 y_� _ �y{1' I a •k \ \ \to .11 -4 —�° ,tea°. I - ��/iw.y 11 immemmem W . , U w , 0 N DO o il C� Mg4 r.1 al*. - , - 5. . , V� F mu • . u . . •wG 7 ti 41 1 . W �/Q� ( s• F /mT/rsll - iT'iaTT 9 0 q `' U ' t3 �,.I N 41 7 U, a o N 00 d W R,. �k Z O U JP, al!onlMan: ZCCI _ 0 w 2 ' 17, = ° ,� $ � , no Z — 14 tL 0 9 o n �� •0 r ■JF 1%. a. n o® A- . ix , III �... s • mIt o , w rn w 44, a F w OJ n• n " -:a s / F� Ny° •• • • - • am OE , 34, , piT:. 0 Jr,. --1 fwd .A = � ' .._______<- EXHIBIT A D-4 • f g 1:---.Tr. 4ta. ii[ rn° 1 1 , Fl..,: Vt. . .... ............__ . 1 ......._.., 0 u, E i .•- ,-, 0 i ____._. 0 72"1 - 1 2 . .... .... —. ---- 4 a ......,,.. _L._ . 0 ra 0 1 1 k.. -44,,e• ... ....... ,. . . • en ■ • ,.., ' • ' . ........ C: AI. l' :-"--:7'14:--r. . ft 8 3 , • , -. "774“,,7 .. . .. ■ t. ICA ,,,,i ' 1 4 " i M leoll, ! . ■i . t- • , S i • LU .... ew.,, , . , , -1. - vg• , t • e Ft., ;Att._ es'ir .: 4, ,,,---- (741.41%,,,,‘, 14:1E it ,.., tACtItit -Cte . . . - .. i to ,... , . i.kith, iAt,,g, ( (-42 ) . . . ,„,... , . r—,......- 4 N o in E- a .,.. ill 1 1 l 1MV, . . •...=.4r ., 1 • treA wo4 -+ et .':::.4 A'.: ' item . 1 ',, .,._44_ . 1• .-ti•,,I1R' - 5::,;.,0.tieiclet ay?,70 ot: 1ip C CO LE cc a rani . . . .. .. . . . • , . .14 , . ,ef.1,41, e, •.- ..gt-,3/4 a : ' i...,...."ct w At , iirr ,;' sokt 0 .• • EXHIBIT B , , ,,, tp,',1, .rat .ira J.,s,L.,. 1 . . . , , ;.bieti -at _ .r. ,f,. , .:..) r. .ta/C'''''•It ' ' D-5 i.'„,.._,..,2 . 14t,l,”,......i. 1.,:"":!::„... • II:•'`:*,:'...: ii.:,•. .L..-: , ,L." , iiim -6 till 121.."r . ... ?.. �'f' - .� _ . _• ice , a ... r.s.1:41..., ., , .........,..... . . rEll' an. aliP el We- -• . '. i ' 1 It Pik ' . L-Oil Mt de-- ' , 1 -Aar • OP i I t o. n DL-7 - •-411111H. . .. 111101- 4,..,".„ .. • t . •_, m . -.- 4.iii.• g— i-----iWi C l F 6 , .. .668 . ea ,..____ wii. • 1 _ .. . , . iv .■ ,; ' I r • ,. OP II it. il- . . . -\\Iii\oi . - ..I.::,-..' 1. r: f} C, olil s y ,� `1 f a • I i:.., i 4 ,.. I It .., i _, ( , , ..... . ,... . 1 \ . _ ....... . ii,„ . ..,„, , ...._ • r- k ''' !.1:' Mil . '1011‘. ' • EXHIBIT C Q_6 '37 el E 1 a E 1 E VD C VI 01 a E n m m E °E m E E ° Ea m o E m c L vl a a v 7 O _c E m E m E E a °' Ea m a �- to co o CM m m I Vl tf1 N L N m a1 I m c I. e-i n O . , , F- 1 ` E C 7 CA C = of (E0 m E co IEa (0 > fO In VI E 17n C CO m m 3 m N MO 00 o7S °YV V) o E E oa E E E. In In m to . o Ln n ° In v E o r` m °,l m N O Ol a E. E a a a a '� a " E E a O m " Lb m E E E E Ea E E o N N OD to m ei E m in CD el to 00 eel rii I� n tr m m m m m `° o co `"1 m 1Eo m m _ _4.4 VI r m 7 7 7 7 m m 7 m m n m m CO LL m F• 1\ 00 D m m ° ---_ Ill V) Vt ul Vl Vl Vl V) VI to LL LL LL LL LL LL ul LL LL LL lima I iliii . 60 $ 00eg trig • O m V ei Vl m o in N VI O OO m `-i m m o lfl N ei V to tD m o O tD CO o Vl m N ey .-1 Tr m 0 ey ei Vl V 00 N O O N Vl .-i Vl O m m V m Vl V v m CO ei N CO Cr) ei CO V Vl in m o 01 el Vl .ti V el VD m N m Vl Vl of N Vl in o CO CO N N. Vl N N. .-I N O m in m a) m m tO mm m m ey m m m m m m m to m m tO m m m m N m U tD Cr, C tD tO m O CO tO 0 0 tD m m O cT 0 0 V O in m to N O w V CO in V Tr CO CO LA R 00 CO V CO CO CO tO CO CO tD OO V CO a' m CO 0 m m m m m m m tD m m m m m m m m m m Cr) m m m m m Cr) O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 F m m m m m m m to m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m el V' in ei m 'S in I� co m el N m et V1 ei N m V Vl a_+ "0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o mp 0 0 0 0 0 C el el ei el el el el el el el el el el el el ti e.1 ei el el e-1 el 0 Q Q Q m m m m m w m U 0 0 0 0 0 w ti ti Q l7 (D l7 C7 r m C Y m al C m > m Vl • 7 • Q Z m Y la _ V _ cU V C L ¢ 0 o N m ti .i C > L ✓1 Y K O Y 7L m C m ✓ C Y 0 u m 00 G m Q U m m al > VI d cc C al C Li YO _ C C m Vl m L 0 m U (Oj G R CL m l7 o O •0 U 0) t C to - 0 !n O • N t': N Y C m ` ICa I^ Ln E m luil Y _� .^ O v co oa al CO ti C m H > m m C C E O_ u m a) > C a c Q > C o: a F 00) 1 'm m m 0 a) m Y C 'm•' w O m in Lli§.O *' o 'C 0 r O U = L.L. m U m U m Q CC w m ti -0 0 m • C m O'L H m Y m p_ m Q '. O ` al an O m �' m U m al C m :° E- °i c co m to E o m 7 L m Z m U y E al 1n 0/ c m O m N E 7 cO In .' C CO U L a J C O N m C 0 C mm N 1- -CS O L. I- Z CO 0 J C T N U > Vi Vl w > d LL 0 CO I- >. C CO S w U a EXHIBIT D g J 41.y, � y 12375 Baseline Road Suite 101 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 909.463.1300 FAX 909.463.1332 October 25, 2011 The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 To Whom It May Concern: We are requesting a modification of our conditional use permit to extend our current hours and allow us to have arcade games in our restaurant. The requested additional hours will allow us to service aur customers on busier days as our competition does. We are also requesting permission to have a tal of 9 standing arcade games and 8 table-tops games. From Monday — Wednesday 10:00 am — 12 am Request extending them from 10:00 a.m. - 1:00.a.m. On Sunday 10 a.m. — 10 p.m. Request extending them from 9:30 a.m. — 11 p.m. In order to stay current with our local competition, and by request from our customers, we are requesting these additional hours. The change in hours would allow us to service our customers and therefore increase our sales during these hard economic times. The arcade games are also a family favorite and draw the families in who are able to have entertainment for their children, as they do in other local restaurants. You can contact me at 909.463.1300 or on my cel phone at 909.261.8330. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, tma tewart Co-Owner/General Manager EXHIBIT B D-8 RESOLUTION NO. 09-02 • RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE HOURS OF OPERATION FROM 11:00 P.M. TO 12:00 MIDNIGHT, MONDAY THROUGH WEDNESDAY; FROM 11:00 P.M.TO 1:00 A.M. ON THURSDAY;AND FROM 12:00 MIDNIGHT TO 2:00 A.M. ON FRIDAY AND SATURDAY AT AN EXISTING SIT-DOWN RESTAURANT WITHIN THE MIXED-USE DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT 12375 BASE LINE ROAD, SUITE 101, IN THE WINERY ESTATES CENTER AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0227-161-58. A. Recitals. 1. Robert Seale of Buffalo Wings & Rings filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00258, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 10, 2009, the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Planning Director hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct, 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Director during the above-referenced public hearing on February 10, 2009, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Director hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The subject site is within the Mixed-Use District, Victoria Arbors Master Plan, within the Victoria Planned Community; and b. Buffalo Wings& Rings is located at 12375 Base Line Road, Suite 101,within the Winery Estates commercial center in Building A at the northeast corner of the center; and c. Restaurants with a full-service bar are permitted within the Mixed-Use District of the Victoria Planned Community with a Conditional Use permit; and d. The site is bounded by existing single-family residences to the north (Low-Medium Residential) and south (Mixed-Use); a vacant commercially zoned parcel to the west (Regional Related Office/Commercial District); and an existing winery to the east (Winery); and e. The applicant is requesting that the closing time be increased to 2:00 a.m., Monday through Saturday. After discussions between the Planning Director and the applicant, it has been agreed • that the closing time shall be increased from 11:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight, Monday through Wednesday; from 11:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. on Thursday, and from 12:00 midnight to 2:00 a.m. on Friday and Saturday. The hours of operation will remain unchanged on Sunday (10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.); and EXHIBIT F D-9 PLANNING DIRECTOR RESOLUTION NO. 09-02 DRC2007-00258 (MODIFICATION) — ROBERT SEALE FOR BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS February 10, 2009 Page 2 • f. The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department ran a call-for-service check for the applicant's address which came back with a number of minor incidents. The calls included a verbal altercation between a manager of the subject business and another business in the center, a couple of verbal disputes in the business and number of calls for patrons leaving without paying. Staff finds that these police calls-for-service were fairly minor and not excessive for a full service restaurant with a bar and that there are no public safety concerns at this time; and g. Staff does not believe that the proposed increase in the operating hours will negatively . affect the existing businesses in the surrounding area,with the majority of businesses in the center closing at 9:00 p.m. or earlier. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Director during the above- referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and c. The application, which contemplates operation of the proposed use, complies with each • of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. d. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project entails increasing the operating hours of an existing restaurant with no expansion or changes to the existing building. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that there will only be an increase in the operating hours and no expansion of the structure. The Planning Director has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. • 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, the Planning Director hereby approves the application,subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department: 1) Approval is granted for a modification to increase the hours of operation for an existing sit down restaurant located at 12375 Base Line Road, Suite 101, in the Winery Estates commercial center. 2) The serving of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to the approved hours for operation of the restaurant, which are Monday through Wednesday from • 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight, Thursday from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., Friday and Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., and Sunday from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. D•10 PLANNING DIRECTOR RESOLUTION NO. 09-02 DRC2007-00258 (MODIFICATION)— ROBERT SEALE FOR BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS February 10, 2009 Page 3 • 3) Modifications to increase the hours of operation beyond what is approved with this modification (DRC2007-00258)will require review and approval by the Planning Commission. 4) All Conditions of Approval and Standard Conditions of Approval related to DRC2007-00258 (Resolution 07-12 and Standard Conditions), except for hours of operation, shall remain in effect. New hours of operation shall be as indicated in Condition of Approval #2 in this Resolution 09-02. 5) The sale and service of alcoholic beverages shall occur only when food items are served at the restaurant and shall cease when full listed menu items are not available to customers. 6) This permit does not allow live music or staged entertainment. Entertainment activities as defined by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 5.12 shall require the applicant to obtain a separate Entertainment Permit approval from the Planning Commission. 7) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations,the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Director for consideration and possible termination of the use. 8) The facility shall be operated in conformance with all applicable performance • standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels. 9) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 10) No amplified music and/or loudspeakers shall be allowed for the outdoor patio area. All speakers currently installed in the outdoor patio area must be removed within 10 days from the approval date of this Resolution. 11) The Outdoor patio dining area shall be closed no later than 11:00 p.m. daily. 12) The Applicant shall submit a full on-site Security Plan to the Planning Department on or before February 24, 2009. The on-site Security Plan shall be subject to the Planning Director review and approval. 13) A progress and compliance report shall be scheduled for the April 21, 2009, Planning Director Meeting, located in the Planning Department Conference Room. • D-11 PLANNING DIRECTOR RESOLUTION NO. 09-02 DRC2007-00258 (MODIFICATION)— ROBERT SEALE FOR BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS February 10, 2009 Page 4 • 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adopted of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2009. PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: �/a...3r .� Donald Granger, Acting Hearing Officers ATTEST: --v ✓J 0 124/0 Denise Sink, Office Specialist II I, Denise Sink, Office Specialist II for the Planning Department for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Director held on the 10th day of February 2009. • • D-12 • RESOLUTION NO. 07-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING NON-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00258, PERMITTING THE SALE AND ON- SITE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (TYPE 47 LIQUOR LICENSE) IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SIT-DOWN RESTAURANT IN THE MIXED USE ZONE OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED AT 12373 BASE LINE ROAD, SUITE 101; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - AP N: 0227-161-58. A. Recitals. 1. The Buffalo Wings& Rings restaurant filed an application for Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00258, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 22, 2007, the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Director of the City • of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Director hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Director during the above-referenced public hearing on May 22, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Director hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 12373 Base Line Road, Suite 101,a 4,030 square foot lease space within the Winery Estates Center, an existing retail center at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard; and b. To the north of the site are single-family residences in the Low-Medium Residential Zone of the Victoria Community Plan (VCP); to the east is the Fillipi Winery in the High Density Residential Zone of the VCP;to the west is a large vacant parcel zoned Regional Related Office/Commercial District(not within the VCP); and to the south are single-family residences in the Mixed Use District of the VCP, and c. The applicant proposes the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption within an existing sit-down restaurant requiring a Type 47 Liquor License issued by the California State Department of Alcoholic Beverages Control (ABC); and d. As a full-service restaurant, no safety concerns are anticipated by the Planning and Police Departments. In addition, the restaurant has not requested approval of an Entertainment Permit. Should entertainment be desired, the applicant will be required to apply for an Entertainment Permit; and • e. Ample parking for the use and adjacent uses in the center is provided; and EXHIBIT G D-13 PLANNING DIRECTOR RESOLUTION NO. 07 12 DRC2007-00258 — BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS RESTAURANT May 22, 2007 • Page 2 • f. The neighboring businesses within the commercial center are compatible with the proposed use. The proposed operating hours and parking requirements of the project will not conflict with these or any of the other existing tenants. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Director during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Director hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. d. The proposed sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits with meals, in conjunction with the subject sit-down restaurant, will have no significant adverse environmental effects. 4. The Planning Director hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Director hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in • the standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference: Planning Department: 1) Approval is hereby granted for the sale and service of alcoholic beverages(i.e., beer, wine, and distilled spirits) in conjunction with a full-service restaurant use at 12375 Base Line Road, Suite 101, in the Winery Estates Center. The restaurant use shall be a "bona fide eating place" as defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 23038. 2) The sale and service of alcoholic beverages shall occur only when food items are served at the restaurant and shall cease when full listed menu items are not available to customers. 3) The serving of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to the approved hours for operation of the restaurant,which are which are Monday through Thursday from 10:00 a.m.to 11:00 p.m., Friday and Saturday from 10:00 a.m.to midnight,and Sunday from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Changes to the closing hours of the restaurant shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 4) Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall be contingent upon the applicant's ability to secure approval of a Type 47 Liquor License issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for this location. • D-14 • PLANNING DIRECTOR RESOLUTION NO. 07 12 DRC2007-00258 — BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS RESTAURANT • May 22, 2007 Page 3 5) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any regulations as set forth in the Uniform Building Code and/or City Ordinances or by the San Bernardino County Health Department and/or California State Department of Alcoholic Beverages Control (ABC). 6) Outdoor patio dining shall be limited to a maximum of four tables with 4 chairs per table within the 300 square foot area, as indicated on approved plans. No amplified music and or loudspeakers shall be allowed for the outdoor patio area. 7) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Director for consideration and possible termination of the use. 8) The facility shall be operated in conformance with all applicable performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels. 9) • The applicant and subsequent owner and/or operators of the restaurant shall install and maintain landscaping materials on the northeast side of the site adjacent to the outdoor dining area. 10) Any signs proposed for the restaurant shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and the Uniform Sign Program for the complex and shall • require review and approval by the Planning Director prior to installation. 11) This permit does not allow live music or staged entertainment. Entertainment activities as defined by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 5.12 shall require the applicant to obtain a separate Entertainment Permit approval from the Planning Commission. 12) No more than three (3) video games and/or other amusement devices shall be permitted at any time in accordance with the Provisions of the Land Use and Development Code. Prior to the issuance of building permits,the applicant shall indicate on plans the location of each and all video games. • 6. The Secretary to the Planning Director shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF MAY 2007. PLANNING DIRECTOR OF TH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9rfrrri-441-) BY: James R. Troyer A P, Planning Director ATTEST: , Barbara Tuncay, Secretary • I, Barbara Tuncay, Secretary of the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Director held on the 22nd day of May 2007. D-15 RESOLUTION NO. 11-59 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00990—A REQUEST TO INCREASE THE HOURS OF OPERATION MONDAY THROUGH WEDNESDAY AND ON SUNDAYS AND ADD ADDITIONAL ARCADE GAMES AT A SIT-DOWN RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 12375 BASE LINE ROAD, SUITE 101, IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-161-58. A. Recitals. 1. Independence Network, Inc. for Buffalo Wings & Rings filed an application for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00990, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On November 9, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application which they continued to the December 14, 2011, and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On December 14, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on November 9, 2011, and continued to December 14, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The subject site is within the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Planned Community; and b. Buffalo Wings & Rings is located within the Winery Estates commercial center in Building A at the northeast corner of the center; and c. Restaurants with a full-service bar are permitted within the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Planned Community with a Conditional Use Permit; and d. The site is bounded by existing single-family residences to the north(Low-Medium • Residential) and south (Mixed Use), a vacant commercially zoned parcel to the west (Regional Related Office/Commercial District), and an existing winery to the east(High Density Residential); and D-16 • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-59 DRC2011-00990— BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS December 14, 2011 Page 2 e. The applicant is requesting to modify their existing Conditional Use Permit to • extend the hours of operation Monday through Wednesday from 12:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. and on Sundays from 10:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. (earlier opening time) and 10:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. (later closing time). The extended hours are necessary to better serve their existing clientele and the economic viability of the business; and f. The applicant is also requesting to have up to 9 standing and 8 table top arcade games. The Development Code classifies a business with over 3 arcade games as an arcade (17.10.030), which requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The standing arcade games will be located adjacent to the entrance of the restaurant, and the table top games will be scattered around the restaurant and in the bar area; and • g. Staff does not believe that the proposed changes will negatively affect the existing businesses in the center as the majority close at 9:00 p.m. or earlier and the arcade games will be closely monitored by the restaurant's staff; and h. The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department ran a call-for-service check for the applicant's address for the past 6 months which came back with only a few calls for employees accidentally setting off the alarm system of the restaurant and an employee theft. Staff finds that these police calls-for-service are very minor and not excessive for a full-service restaurant with a bar and therefore believe there are no public safety concerns at this time. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: • a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or the improvements in the vicinity; and c. The application, which contemplates operation of the proposed use,complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. d. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project entails increasing the operating hours and adding arcade games at an existing restaurant with no expansion or changes to the existing building. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that there will only be an increase in the operating hours and no expansion of the structure. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs with staffs determination of exemption. 4. Based upon the findings and the conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 • above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. D-17 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-59 DRC2011-00990— BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS December 14, 2011 Page 3 • Planning Department: 1) Approval is granted for an increase in the hours of operation and an increase in the number of arcade game at an existing sit-down restaurant located at 12375 Baseline Road, Suite 101, in the • Winery Estates commercial center. 2) The serving of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to the approved hours for operation of the restaurant, which are Monday through Wednesday from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., Thursday from 10:00 a.m.to 1:00 a.m., Friday and Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., and Sunday from 9:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. • 3) A maximum of 9 stand up and 8 table top arcade games are permitted. Any increase in the number of arcade games will require modification of this approval. 4) The arcade games shall be monitored on a regular basis by the staff of the restaurant. 5) All Conditions of Approval related to DRC2007-00258(Resolution 07-12), except for hours of operation and the increase of arcade games (9 standing and 8 table top), shall remain in effect. • 6) The sale and service of alcoholic beverages shall occur only when food items are served at the restaurant and shall cease when full listed menu items are not available to customers. • 7) This permit does not allow live music or staged entertainment. Entertainment activities as defined by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 5.12 shall require the applicant to obtain a separate Entertainment Permit approval from the Planning Commission. 8) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon the adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Director for consideration and possible termination of the use. 9) The facility shall operate in conformance with all applicable performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels. 10) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. • 0-18 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-59 DRC2011-00990 — BUFFALO WINGS & RINGS December 14, 2011 Page 4 • 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP,,Secretary I, James R.Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: • ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: - • D-19 tegie w COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �" DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2011-00990 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: INDEPENDENCE NETWORK, INC. FOR BULLFALO WINGS & RINGS • LOCATION: 12375 BASE LINE ROAD, SUITE 101 —APN: 0227-161-58 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/ /_ agents,officers,or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 11-59 Standard / /_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use _/_/_ has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. • D-20 1 Project No. DRC2011-00990 • • Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/� site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / /_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/ /_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. • • • • • 2 D-21 • STAFF REPORT celtr PLANNING DEPARTMENT I J Date: December 14, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Subject: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00254 - ALL STATE PAPER AND METAL RECYCLING - JAMES LIN - A request to operate a 4.42-acre recycling facility within the Heavy Industrial District of Subarea 15 on the south side of Whittram Avenue between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue at 13195, 13207, 13231, 13243, and 13253 Whittram Avenue - APN: 0229-192-09, 06, 04, 03 & 02. Related File: Development Review DRC2011-00255 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00255 - ALL STATE PAPER AND METAL RECYCLING - JAMES LIN - A request to make site improvements including constructing new screen walls, installing all street improvements and landscaping, complete on-site paving and add employee eating area and parking for a 4.42 project site located within the Heavy Industrial District of Subarea 15 on the south side of Whittram Avenue between Pecan Avenue and • Hickory Avenue at 13195, 13207, 13231, 13243, and 13253 Whittram Avenue - APN: 0229- 192-09, 06, 04, 03 & 02. Related Project: DRC2011-00254. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning —Terra Vista Community Plan: North - Vehicle Storage— General Industrial (Subarea 8) South - Vacant Land — Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) East - Auto Dismantler— Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) West - Vehicle Storage— Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Heavy Industrial North - General Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East - Heavy Industrial West - Heavy Industrial C. Site Characteristics: The 4.42-acre project site is made up of multiple parcels and is located on the south side of Whittram Avenue between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue. The street frontage along Whittram Avenue has not been widened to the ultimate right-of-way width and the street improvements have not been installed. The site is developed with multiple small covered work areas, a bathroom facility and is partially paved. The site is divided by two unrelated properties which are • developed with a single-family residence and an automotive repair shop. Items E & F • • ■ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255—ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 2 ANALYSIS: • A. Entitlement Requirement: Section 17.30.030 of the Development Code requires that scrap operations obtain a Conditional Use Permit. The Scrap Operation classification covers the storage and sale from the premises and/or dismantling of used recyclables. As part of the approval, the applicant is required to make a number of site improvements (street, landscaping and screen walls) which require the approval of a Development Review and Planning Commission approval. B. Project Description: The applicant proposes upgrading and expanding their existing ferrous metal processing facility on Whittram Avenue. The facility has been operating at this location without the required Conditional Use Permit since 1987. The applicant operates a second recycling facility on Etiwanda Avenue which operates under a separate Conditional Use Permit. All State Recycling processes approximately 30,000 to 50,000 tons of scrap metal per year. The two facilities operate in tandem, with trucks first arriving at the Etiwanda Avenue facility to be weighed and then transferred over to the Whittram Avenue facility to either pick up or drop off metal (depending if they are purchasing or selling metal). They then return to the Etiwanda Avenue facility to be weighed again to either pay or be paid for the metal. The applicant proposes installing a second scale at the Whittram Avenue facility to reduce vehicle travel between the two sites. The Whittram Avenue facility receives the scrap metal, breaks it down into smaller pieces and then resells it. The facility currently operates on 5 parcels which are separated by two unrelated parcels. The 2 unrelated parcels consist of a single-family residence and an automotive repair shop. The applicant is in the process of completing a lot line adjustment (Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA689) for • a portion of the parcel on which the residence is located and a lease for a portion of the parcel on which the automatic repair shop is located. The additional land will provide truck access between the two sites in order to limit truck traffic on Whittram Avenue. C. Description of Operations: All State Recycling currently employs 42 employees between their Etiwanda Avenue and the Whittram Avenue facilities. The Whittram Avenue facility will have 6 full time employees. The facility will operate one shift from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on Monday through Friday and from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 pm. on Saturdays. They will receive approximately 10 to 15 truck trips per day. D. Site Improvements: As part of this approval the following improvements will be made to bring the site into conformance with the current requirements of the Heavy Industrial Development District: 1. Install street improvements including curb, sidewalks, landscaping and pay utility undergrounding in lieu fees for the Whitram Avenue frontage, including the frontage adjacent to the single-family residence and vehicle repair shop. 2. Construct an 8-foot high decorative wall with a decorative cap and view obscuring metal gates along Whittram Avenue and between the project site and the single-family residence. 3. Construct 8-foot high painted metal screen walls along the east and west property lines and along a portion of the property line separating the project site from the single-family residence. These metal screen walls will not be visible from the Whittram Avenue right-of-way. 4. Construct an 8-foot high tan precision block wall with a decorative cap along the south property • line adjacent to the rail road right-of-way. E & F - 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255—ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 3 • 5. Construct an employee parking area, outdoor eating area and upgrade the existing bathroom facility. 6. Upgrade the existing on-site covered work areas. 7. Pave the entire site and add a vehicle scale along the south property line. 8. Upgrade the windows and doors of the single-family residence in order to reduce the indoor noise levels to City standards as recommended in the Acoustical Impact Report (LSA — June 2011). E, Time Line for Protect Completion: The applicant has submitted the following time line for completion all the proposed site improvements taken from the date of Planning Commission approval: 1. Walls and gates—2 months 2. Noise mitigation for the single-family residence —3 months 3. On-site improvements (paving, parking facility, outdoor eating area, upgrade of the covered work area) - 4 months 4. Street improvements and landscaping — 6 to 8 months • F. Parking: The applicant does not propose any on-site structures other than the existing bathroom facility and covered work areas. Staff has determined that the 10 parking spaces proposed on the • site will be adequate for the 6 employees along with any visitors to the site. G. Land Use Compatibility: The project site is located within the Heavy Industrial Development District which permits open air storage of large mounds of raw and semi-refined products. The surrounding uses include vehicle storage, vehicle dismantling, vehicle repair and a non-conforming single-family residence. The major negative effect that the recycling facility will have on the surrounding land uses will be noise, especially for the neighboring single-family residence. As part of this approval, the applicant will construct 8-foot high masonry and metal walls between the project site and the neighboring uses, as well as provide upgraded windows and doors for the neighboring single-family residence.' The proposed site improvements and mitigation measures should reduce the negative effects on the neighboring property owners to an acceptable level. H. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, Granger) on October 4, 2011. The main issue was the type of screening material that would be required along the east, west and south property lines and adjacent to the single-family residence. The Committee recommended that the applicant provide a solid block wall along the south property line, painted metal fences along the east and west elevations and a decorative block wall between the facility and the single-family residence. The applicant has made all the requested changes. I. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The project was reviewed by the Committees on October 4, 2011. The Committees recommended approval of the project without changes. • J. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined E & F - 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255—ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 4 that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, cultural resources, hydrology • and water quality, noise, air quality, green house gas emissions and geology and soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00254 and Development Review DRC2011-00255 by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Respectfully submitted, • dAftr.) Jam . Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:TV/Is • Attachments: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Business Description Exhibit C - Design Review Action Comments dated October 4, 2011 Exhibit D - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00254 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2011-00255 • E & F - 4 if qg / & ° yi • ® a z , : o Ili. . vq • I!1 8 ' " u3 g�3 ..ao+- i ' o= Q ;'3 ,yeyp gE ❑ MO _ a @ _ sa�igy ggg5 fir„ ., w o o �—° -". 5 DAD© � j `� ,_ y �s 1__—b LTEjElasE 71�udon ° �l ®IC 't-�44 iili SSE / 4 I : i 1 H i Ri. J1 I" il �'� � !h dY�Sa E Y lhl L gy✓ret Ys, x' >- a z � �"��MP �'. 1 � +I� + I � f 4 1F Q- r P c i r r f ya r vv} �� $ rk r,^Y , : =c �7 f 9 e I I'i1 r- + 0"r y yE�W h� 't —b 4 f 9 € rY e+ I €Y ut,` ', p f f,�V'8a "L�a � a ° d " F I�fl' r h`411 Fxr P�I , E� ite, 1 3 �' 1 al +I'1 fu ' ��- at of "F3 rat- vli�a}, �` w illl.` + +I -^-t .Y re4 ai p- • N 1 ��.] Y u L;Ci'I1 v d b 'd G K A �„ 1 c ,w. 1 --' r Yr u S[ -V yak. '!',.-.5 : ,[' ,[r r �i %r ,v R- I• "41 -r B "�';'f 1+ _ W i.3 Et yli X 'NC:- iu ql � a w ; 2 fig SM+ *S 3 n i �+ ¢1 T " r i+ la Nr + '. �I sl it r Ya �F •wt li ' v� .� r w -. i yg 1. t jl� 1 ,' rs a a s td ! yi k ly-4 '' r 1. , li II r .p ri4 Jot ai .1 e- ` �' .;,+'k, '-- :±Tn "r- "' -tt;-{' i'` h ' 9 ` '''- n r r c ° 7 x� 4s:5'IS 7 • i + �- >tr vv n r Ev Y t 5 4 E' -+ 1 ' s e f 1 Y ��I', ! ,9j_ i-14' 't1 d ,- 41)41YI r -�. 1 a f rNY C u l vl+i ,"gf m' + r ,y2.r m t Cb 1 III - r -F u",7�I4 It" i , f -r r"�' s- � ' ° _� rl� nx _ 1 _ 1sr re r ,a; i s � ; kz' < k - : : { L k�l Yom . ec ' #, 1u '[ t"'* p kl" A e e__.'e4 i T+M1 i �T _ F I gp ,t 1 �Z m ,i� r l". ,� �- 4 a vi4 -, .r y L i- [ i k ." d f`fr,y2) f1y3 e4 i 4``� _�i +v t+ '.€ -"� G '`a* µr 6# F �x r a k'€' �I- `t 1+;, L" t ¶II. + ..� L `Saxes„ -'yg J r- 4.#i� -�E - z i,�. } c,_ t .xW , • "r=='_".L4pA rX i i ' ,wq-m L i ',CA= Niy€ ,;i1k5.. 4, t :. �s: e �� ^ t a �r�-mow s - - a 9 EXHIBIT A " Vim! C� M s tg,--Fi ..i„ 'xw^-` a+ y �.4 y _ �.,,_"°� „ • E & F - 5 pp — Q ri e v mow : [ p rlA@ € @ -� 'MN It I ,,,,, w 2 9 1 4 8 ' ¢ J 1411 Eas5eg _ 03 8U g. ea tit _ij ILP�t�F wail' a , y^' s EJ I I A J111 E i 6 d s g _ii§ 1D3 1111111E. B e M E- 1 ry o ¢ ! . g i i F A g Y fl i W @S : HlS t C y s Q ps- fi r r 1I ni m a • I e e c e e 2 a I— 3 — �i I es L= r —moo s R h a,5 w @ sA .. h:"1 l ' J g gee $ 1J1 gNI$ g 4' I (7 Q nmsena a -,,E S§s.E E 5°a TATS T 3 QM Z a I I -- .+isa miw li 6 z r CI CI Q 'O I Y 0 _U N ; 16 Z vo U o � fit �o�a\ : 1< U _ r'Y .g n U L � , o U N Z � s LiJ r R g d r' a e:' e, w m E4 °s s g ; d Ham ,' r y a d l i g ' h Q I— J ➢ J a A Q a 4 E u' f ssI I I rI I $ A 11 A 1 p1i a I ] 5 E 6 ° € b 1 4 it '1 e 1 .J 1 l' a I d Ill 6 • I dT I ;l �U a I tar =VI -1 Iii 1.11 • E & F — 6 Iy9y 11 s § F z Z 6,.,,6 a% ld 05 r3 P; i S 1 d b 6 8 u H gib ; II. . C3 l i K 0 a- is • q E E „W as gb 2noa�g = ot = z s 1 N c i;1 @ I I .1 Q Ar 81 J `-; 9 I rEB Ili J El. Q_il- 0 iF I I I .1 0.-: 10 � I I„ rI r.. ' F 33104 wn w as h1 • II 1 . 6i- — . /� s e I n i J t Im ss a Q I v imx-un3-\ 6 rl i !io V 1 q b` . '� I 3 III la II¢per` a / / r � R% i \� J q I I H _ _ L I�✓ x p iI - � ''''-'71-1--.71.2 mie I r *. lye uI `J<w. 1JX31 Ml xvq l5n3 f 9 1 • E & F - 7 il M o Z ae 9 '1i PI —ez, ,} ik .... i o ga 3 'ldRe F a' F v „4 v• 1 P. lzhli G1 } y i 11 I t . I . f nal EN d' w 8 t 11 g k: 11 1r yn Yile t LL �_ ? ui �I! �I i 2 bsd n P X11 IP A 1v� _ Er 1, '¢ :fir 11 s= !.� qqr ei: !!i c"6i ;1511 IL NI _ --- ' — . e 1 .g —c,--$--4^Y §G' a £g 4 • � En Iy . :_ 1 w&, S E s . R'. 4}r. x4 r _I E6',:! y§ q e rOh 3g I.. , . e e i , at,,,•,,... ..,:......i p. .: �e®� gl 3 :aem • , „ g, , , ,.. ,..„::: ...•::::::„ •. . , . ,..„..• , g 41 ".I r ig C IuIIiry�Ihs - ��'� yyyyyyy,l ; 3 IIIIIIMAMI " 1 + 7S-1.4,'..14,,r4 . �prr .. o 0 E ! I1 H I;'ru/ 4§ 1 I 4 f1a: r�o� Ay tri ".. , g J I a L. ; e sY5g s. a w n = ssa' a. 1..., p � r . . \ �'.! .L Ss- ; • w n .n 1 �EI\� n ... ay�\? y "a y a z CC d ' 3 E �.. . ®® e. -w 0 63 • „,., . E & F - 8 .......... a I21. oe � 1z z B @ P 'Ii • ['ms 4 p„ s c s : Ae Y, e s a g e ti < as�.} 5it;E 4 ®@® BQ ° 5 a 3e a ° ae ! "� il $ g 1 r�2 8 ' aw iI `pi'!1;• NOgNOS t e e ; a $ i F H w k . I eerse z0 m e i y e e N ,_ Z :m' 1,3 E iii € € € 9 € EpEEp ` ' 9fi A iI di 2 G i D E A A I` A E E e j es 1 1,960 6 s a `5 7 9 7 U e • e�¢ e o fl F Y § z! q \ �..1 F I e �amUY wx \\ g 3 R � $ .'A 1 le Y �a l 5M ..p as). 1 `` g�° �6 cP GI .I ;CI. r z.j F q E ma 1 $ f` ) W 3e K ;-21. 'l r:a F ' 'I c I%< °- lb ill pV 3 Ea [. Al t -\\� . :. . .' g. 1 L q I d t �\\'�\F\1�\.\\4 • II ��LL PI 1. II :1_. " Y ... ti :V 1 k . f ; 1 _ Y 1. �. (\ N ° � I € �g ggB9gB C :z co F m l I +1'I G I a El E & F — 9 eii as ;i\' 1�1re,. • a gaS g5 .° 8 8 8 ED 8 8 8 tlq 111+�I ig11 & 3 S F I F F Le R 9$1 `3k. e ® ag g 5 R F Pi E&4 S z � 1 u f R s € e ie3 19 s Z a T 6 i a ! c }p}p< Liu 1 3 3 1. p 14 Se9p aga i 'r'q :y w g $ d $ fie§¢ 83 f [ WO 3 m w O v' s € x+ 3 N a Zp f e in . g E t i g 2 d RIt B3lib O` U 61 �,yilg 5" p 4, E 3 v 8 3 4 t O ei eep A 6 5 � tl m �8 �po L i F Q 3 i 1 4 e 3 1 6 p ZA i § i1 ° 0 i e�. C`oi -,V u z“ z s € dy� zyp c1' 3 _ iie FE&ii 661 Z� = j E€ lb �3 Ws k G� Z Z G . 2 2 3 ~ :a 6 3 C Z / 3 4 6 L' i@ b 6 i ! Z[ 3 § Z¢ _ i .:��� I `V•x'08000®0000®C) C . . _ . a.. . .. . P ' \p �; <' .. \I II • 4, € , 3 o - LrL r ‘,Bµ s e tyy a 1:2' ' : O l 1 } 53F T II — a� �. f — — — 1 i tang itc 7 CC O It (4,5 1�> Q O1 }} U II I 1 z o E En E I 3 < I .A i 10 a OA 3 � o II".. 5 35 5� 3 ri,k� / < le. 1 < it �' cu +s{ I _ i3 � 9., 35 a Gy l Z . Ua E r. j ��> a o CD fit__ b 9 s,- o a .,�v uS =9 a O _ 4< 5 43 a 2-: ...t C TvS -- >.w IJ3N Wig 1.-.3.4.-'3% d C • um m es cN d c — C v° E & F - 10 Q ; • ry},S L7 fm nnem��. ALL STATE PAPER & METAL RECYCLING CO., INC. 1e1�`�]{{RR' tnsm ne nt DEALER Of SCRAP META'M1.t S&CARDBOARD ARDBOARD ISRI Recycling Ce ALUMINUM CAN• COPPER BRASS Reryrsling �-CYCC\� '1T1..:909-R99-3 fl I I • tt9<+ 351 - FAX:9t)4-R99-457'5 Munition,Inc. Tlif.ORICtNt t.Air./CIERt RE: IARC2011-00254 & -00255, All Stare Paper and Metal Recycling Co., Inc ("All State") lames I.in - A request to operate a scrap operation within the Heavy Industrial District of Subarea 15 at 13195, 13207, 13231, 13243,and 13253 \\.'hittram Avenue - APN: (1229-192-09, 06, 04, 03 & 02 (five parcels) All State (Lin Family) starred its recycling business at \lhirtam facility in 1987. A nearby Etiwanda facility (8889 Etiwanda Avenue)was purchased and serves as main office in 1997. The original\\hittram facilin' consists of 2 parcels which had been used as recvcli.ng yard when Lin family acquired in 1987. The and was recently expanded from the original 2 parcels to 5 parcels Operation in late 2(117. The current \\'hittram yard can be identified as 2 originally owned parcels on the west and 3 recently leased parcels on the east. The west two parcels (APNs 0229-192-09 & 06) arc owned by Lin family of All State. The cast 3 parcels are currently under 5-years lease agreement. All State has expressed intention to purchase those leased parcels from current owners in the near future. The \Vhittram yard receives,handles, sorts. processes, and transports ferrous scrap metals. Most of scrap metals are purchased from customers in Rancho Cucamonga, neighboring communities and southern California. All processed scraps are placed in containers and shipped off site by truck. The great majority of scrap metals are exported to Asia B Jr reuse. The \\'hittram facility does nor equip with weight station All scraps are weighted, paper works processed at Etiwanda • main facility/office located "t mile southwest of \\'hiYnam site Off-road vehicles/equipments, such as shear-crane, grappler, bulldozer. bobcat, excavator, torch cutter, and forklift are used onsite for scrap metal processing and handling. All State currently employed a total of 42 employees at Frivy.-anda and \Vhittram facilities. There are only six (6) full- time employees working at \Thittram yard. The facility operates one shift from 7:30 am to 3:30 pm on Monday to Friday, 7.311 am to 2:30 pm on Saturday The typical daily material intakes are averaging 10-13 truck trips. The. A\'hittram facility recycles an average of 30,900-50,000 tons of scrap metals per year. Fear every Ion of steel recycled, 2,801.1 pounds of iron Ore. 1.400 pound of coal and 120 pounds of limestone are conserved. Steel product . can be recycled repeatedly without loss of strength. Due to nrarmetit-properties that make steel the easiest material to separate from solid waste Stream. Almost of 6901, of all steel is recycled in North America (Facts from American Iron and Steel institute). The benefit of this recycling facility expansion project is to bring the existing non-conforming facility and neighboring properties into code compliance, reducing traffic backup on \Vhittram Avenue, increasing material recycling flow rate. The project is etpeeted to pay for street improvements of six contiguous parcels (13195, 13207, 13221. 13231, 13243 & 13253 \Vhittram Avenue). The project will result installation of public sidewalk, skeet lights, streetscape and public fire hydrants on the frontage of the project (5 parcels) and the one ow parcel (AT'N I1229-I92- 03, 13221 \Chittram :Avenue). All State is committed to fully comply with all relevant Federal, State: County, City codes and safer health, environmental rules and regulations. 0 August 18,2011 • 8889 F,TJWANDA AVY.t`UF,It ANr3/G CUC:AMONG A,CA 91710 EXHIBIT B E & F - 11 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:10 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag October 4, 2011 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00255 - ALL STATE PAPER AND METAL RECYCLING - JAMES LIN - A request to operate a scrap operation and make improvements to the 4.42-acre site within the Heavy Industrial District of Subarea 15, located at 13195, 13207, 13231, 13243, and 13253 Whittram Avenue - APN: 022-192-09, 06, 04, 03, and 02. Related file: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00254. Proiect Proposal: The applicant proposes upgrading their existing ferrous metal processing facility on Whittram Avenue. The facility has been operating at this location since 1987 and around the corner on Etiwanda Avenue since 1999. The two facilities operate in tandem, with trucks first arriving at the Etiwanda Avenue facility to be weighed and then heading to the Whittram Avenue facility to either pick up or drop off metal (depending if they are purchasing or selling metal). They then go back to the Etiwanda Avenue facility to be weighed again to either pay or be paid for the metal. The Whittram Avenue facility receives the scrap metal, breaks it down into smaller pieces, and then resells it. The Whittram Avenue facility currently operates on 5 parcels which are separated by 2 unrelated parcels. The 2 unrelated parcels consist of a single-family residence and an automotive repair shop. The applicant proposes purchasing a portion of the parcel on which the residence is located and leasing a portion of the parcel on which the automatic repair shop is located in order to provide truck access between the two sites and limit truck traffic on Whittram Avenue. The applicant has submitted an • acoustic study which recommends installing new windows in the residence to reduce noise from the facility. The existing facility has been operating on a portion of the two sites on Whittram Avenue without a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and has been directed that the existing facility will need to be upgraded as part of the CUP approval process. The upgrades include street improvements (curb, sidewalk, landscaping), a new 10-foot high decorative wall and view obscuring metal gates along Whittram Avenue (Development Code limits the height of stored material to the screen wall height for the first 120 feet from the curb face), 10-foot high walls along the rail road right-of-way, employee parking, and outdoor eating area, upgrading existing on-site structures (bathroom facility and covered work areas), paving and on-site clean up. The street frontage upgrades will also include the areas in front of the single-family residence and the automotive repair shop. Staff Comments: Staff feels that the proposed changes will greatly improve this portion of Whittram Avenue. A number of issues remain that need to be resolved by the Design Review Committee. The applicant proposes using painted solid metal fencing material along the rail right-of-way, along the west property line, and between the project site and the residence and automotive shop. The question is whether the metal fencing is adequate. It should be noted that there are other businesses that use metal fencing along Whittram Avenue, and that the Development Code permits masonry, concrete, wood metal, or chain link with slats in the Heavy Industrial District. Staff feels the metal fencing may be appropriate (if properly installed and painted) along the rail right-of-way and along the west property line. Staff believes that block walls would be a more appropriate separation between the facility and the • residence (with the block wall located along the side of the house and continuing a minimum 20 feet from the back of the house). • EXHIBIT C E & F - 12 • DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2011-00255—ALL STATE PAPER AND METAL RECYCLING —JAMES LIN • October 4, 2011 Page 2 The applicant is also proposing to line the east property line with metal shipping containers and leaving the existing chain link fencing in place (there is an auto wrecking business to the east). Staff has informed the applicant that if the Design Review Committee approves the use of the shipping containers as screening, they will at minimum need to paint them all a coordinating color. Major Issues: None. Secondary Issues: 1. Whether metal fencing is an adequate screening material or should be upgraded to decorative block walls. • 2. Whether block walls (rather than metal fencing) should be used to screen the facility from the neighboring residential use. If block walls are required, for what distance? 3. Whether shipping containers may be used to screen the facility from the neighboring industrial use or should be upgraded to either a solid metal fencing or block walls. Policy Issues: 1. Barbed wire shall not be used on the property line walls facing Whittram Avenue or the railroad • right-of-way. • 2. A Sign Permit is required for all signage. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee direct staff to the appropriateness of the proposed changes and whether the project may be scheduled for Planning Commission review with staff reviewing any recommended changes. • Design Review Committee Action: The project was approved with the following changes: 1. Provide an 8-foot high masonry wall along the entire south property line (rail road right-of-way). 2. Provide solid metal fences along the east and west property lines and between the project site and the automotive shop. 3. Provide an 8-foot high decorative wall between the existing residence and the project site. The wall shall run from the north property line to the terminus of the adjacent subterranean loading dock. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag • • • E & F - 13 ' -Piint:.Form k , ENVIRONMENTAL • INFORMATION FORM al, u ._ (Part I - Initial Study) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It.is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological,drainage,and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. • GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. • Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: • Project Title: All State Paper and Metal Recycling- Scrap Metal Recycling Yard on Whitiram Avenue Name &Address of project owner(s): All State Paper and Metal Recycling Co., Inc. 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 • • Name &Address of developer or project sponsor: All State Paper and Metal Recycling Co., Inc. 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Contact Person &Address: James Lin, President/CEO I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 1 EXHIBIT D E & F - 14 Name &Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): J. George Chu, AICP, LEED AP • 718 W 16th St. Upland, CA 91784 • Telephone Number: 909-322-5134 PROJECT INFORMATION &DESCRIPTION: • Information.indicated by an asterisk(')is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. `1; Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2; Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): 13195 &13297 (All State property), 13221 &13231 (Vasquez property) and 13243 & 13253 (Mushegain TRS property) Whittram Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 North of railroad track, on the south side of Whittram Avenue between Pecan Ave and Hickory Ave 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): APNs 0229-192-09 & 06 (All State owned) • APN 0229-192-05(Anita Vasquez),APN 0229-192-04 (south half, leased from Anita and Telesforo Vasquez) APN 0229-192-03 & 02 (leased from Richard D & Lauren M Mushegain TRS and Thomas L Mushegain TR) *5) Gross Site Area(ac/sq. ft.): • • *6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 3.83 acres+ dedications): 100% of parcels APNs 0229-192-09, 06, 03 & 02 and southern portions of APNs 0229-192-05 & 04 7, Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): No proposed general plan amendment(GPA)or zone change. The subject site and all surrounding lands are zoned for heavy industry uses. 8 Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 2 E & F - 15 • agencies in order to fully implement the project: • 1. Conditional Use Permit(CUP)from City of Rancho Cucamonga 2. Existing Industry Facility Permit No.: 8 361021481 issued by State Water Resource Control Board The existing WDID applied to the existing facility at 13195 & 13207 Whittram Avenue (APNs 0229-192-09 & 06 WDID need be updated to include the newly expanded area 9, Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals,mature trees,trails and roads,drainage courses,and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys,traffic studies): General slope: 0.5%to 1.5%toward south, west and southwest direction Stable soils with good drainage course toward Etiwanda Creek; A few mature trees along parcel/property lines Whittram Avenue on the north, Railroad track on the south APN 0229-192-09 & 06: site paved, existing shade structures and loading dock/platform APN 0229-192-05: single-family house (built 1944) located at the north end of this parcel (not a part) APN 0229-192-04: an automobile repairs garage located on the north of this parcel (not a part) • APN 0229-192-03 &02: gravel on top of native soils and a small, deteriorated rest room with septic 10 Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): None • • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS COUNTER\Initial Study Panl.doc Page 3 E & F - 16 • 11, Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: Railroad track on the south: Noises generated by passing trains • Whittram Avenue (Collector Road) on the north: Roadway used by surrounding industry users 12. Describe the proposed project in detail This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: APN 0229-192- 09 &06. The existing scrap metal recycling yard operated by All State Recycling since 1987 APN 0229-192-05: To lease and use the southern 50'wide for fire access lane (26' paved) APN 0229-192-04: To lease and use the south half for material storage APN 0229-19203 & 02: To lease and use the entire two parcels for materials storage and operations • • 13, Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic • aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): • East: Industry; Existing auto wrecking yard with a workshop(metal shed building) West: Industry; Existing equipment/vehicle storage yard and green waste recycling yard North of project: A one story single-family house built in year 1944 and a auto repairs garage shed building North of Whittram Avenue: Industry; Construction equipment and materials storage yard South: abutting railroad track and to further south is vacant heavy industry land 14 Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partt.doc Page 4 E & F - 17 15 Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? • This is an existing scrap metal recycling yard. The expansion of materials storage to the west is not expected to significantly raise noise above current level. *16, Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: To remove 4 existing trees to allow 26' wide pavement for fire access lane on the parcel of APN 0229-192-05 • 17, Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: Etiwanda Creek 14 Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please • contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) Peak use(gal/Day) • b. Commerciallnd. (gal/day/ac) Peak use(gal/min/ac) 19 Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. S Septic Tank ❑ Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) _g b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) 183 L7 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: • 20, Number of residential units: Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: • Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 5 E & F - 18 21, Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ • Rent(per month) $ to $ 22, Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23, Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: • 24 Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High • COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25, Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: The site is an existing scrap metal storage and recycling yard operated by All State Recycling since 1987. The subject yard is a part of All State Recycling operations. It is located at 1/2 miles southwest of the site. All business functions and processing are conducted at main office located on 8889 Etiwanda Avenue. 26, Total floor area of commercial,industrial, or institutional uses by type: No proposed new building on site 27, Indicate hours of operation: Monday-Friday: 7:30 am to 3:30 pm Saturday: 7:30 am to 2:30 pm 28) Number of employees: TotaL5 out of 45 All State's employees Maximum Shift: One shift only Time of Maximum Shift: 9 hours, 7:30 am to 3:30 pm • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 6• E & F - 19 29 Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate o hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): • Forklift Driver: $8.00/hr, ROH 1/yr Torch Operator: $8.0 to $15.0/hr, ROH 1/yr Crane Operator: $10.0 to $15.0/hr, ROH N/A 30, Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: No new hires at Whittram site *31. For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should b( verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818) 572-6283): The air quality analysis and health risk assessment were conducted by LSA Associates in Irvine, CA. The environmental impact of air pollution emissions are below threshold for consideration of mitigation. • ALL PROJECTS 32 Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to providt adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. • Fontana Water Company: Yes; Existing water mains and service meters located on Whittram Avenue No sewer services in this area. Septic only Fire Construction Services: Yes;Applicant to install two new public fire hydrants on Whittram Avenue. 33 In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials:: Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides ant herbicides;fuels, oils,solvents.and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, i known. No The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared by Converse Consultants in Redlands, CA. • 1:\PLANNING\FINALIFORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Porn.doc Page 7 E & F - 20 34 Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use.storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used ant • proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown ant labeled on the application plans. Temporary storage of motor oils and diesel for use of on-site equipments. Long-term use of LPG for torch used in metal cutting. Used oils to be picked up and treated and disposal by certified/qualified recycier No expected discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials. 35 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission%°lanning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the dat n nformation.required for adequate evaluation of tnis project to the best of my ability.that the facts,statements,and information plesepte. -- me and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be require. - itted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucemc,Crga. - - - AMP • Date: March 24, 2011 �-` t. lr. Signature —�- • Title: C, E , v • • • 1:1PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Pall.doc Page 8 • E & F - 21 `i'� City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00254 and Development Review DRC2011-00255 2. Related Files: N/A 3. Description of Project: A request to operate a 4.42-acre scrap operation and make site improvements including constructing new screen walls, installing all street improvements and landscaping, complete.on-site paving and add employee eating area and parking for a project site located within the Heavy Industrial District of Subarea 15 at 13195, 13207, 13231, 13243, and 13253 Whittram Avenue APN: 0229-192-09, 06, 04, 03 & 02. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: James Lin for All State Recycling 5. General Plan Designation: Heavy Industrial 6. Zoning: Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 4.42 acre site is located on the south side of • Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Hickory Avenue. The site is currently being used as a ferrous metal recycling facility that includes large piles of ferrous metal, a small building that includes restroom facilities and a number of open sided covered work areas. The site is divided down the middle by a non-conforming single-family residence and an automotive repair shop. To the east, west and north are developed sites used for industrial purposes and to the south is an active rail line. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe van der Zwaag (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR — Environmental Impact Report FEIR— Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES —National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System • NOx— Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases E & F - 22 • Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 2 PM,()— Fine Particulate Matter • RWQCB — Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G— Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or"Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓) Aesthetics (V) Agricultural Resources (✓)Air Quality ( ) Biological Resources (✓) Cultural Resources (✓) Geology & Soils (✓) Greenhouse Gas ( ) Hazards &Waste Materials (✓) Hydrology &Water Quality Emissions ( ) Mineral Resources (1) Noise ( ) Land Use & Planning (✓) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Utilities & Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of ( ) Transportation/Traffic Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A • NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Prepared By: ' i Date: /7'f/ ii i Reviewed By: /� Pills .. l Date: I t `3 /I) • • • Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 23 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 3 • Less Than Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wT Than Significant Mitigation Simpoci No I Impact Incorporated mD8d mpaG EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway, There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • c) The site is located on the south site Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Hickory Avenue and is characterized by heavy industrial development to the north, east and west, a rail line to the south and is adjacent to a non-conforming single-family residence. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project as the site is in an area designated for heavy industrial uses. The applicant will install street improvements and landscaping along the public right-of-way and will construct decorative screen walls to limit public view of the on-site activities. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? • b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 24 • Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 4 Sane Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially vnm Than Sigmhcant corpaticn Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoing of, . ( ) O ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located on the south site Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Hickory Avenue and is characterized by heavy industrial development to the north, east and west, a rail line to the south and is adjacent to a non- conforming single-family residence. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to General Plan Table RC-2. • Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development.' Further, a large number of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is located on the south site Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and • Hickory Avenue and is characterized by heavy industrial development to the north, east and west, a rail line to the south and is adjacent to a non-conforming single-family Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 25 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC201 1-00 255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 5 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially watt an PP 9 Significant t Mitigation Significant No Imoatt IncotpwateG Impact Impact residence. The nearest agricultural use is more than 3 miles to the north from the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? • e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the 'AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore, the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) Both the State of California and the federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (No2), sulfur dioxide (So2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2,5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the'South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this • include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 26 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 6' Than Less • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ptanual With Than Significannt t Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated ITDBLt Impact regulates stationary sources of pollution within.in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMto), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern • California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM10 and PM2.5. Specffic criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air impact study was prepared by (LSA, March 2011) that utilizes the Urban Emissions Model URBEMIS 2007 Version 9.2.4 methodology and CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993 to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Green House Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction) Impacts There will be minimal short term impact related to the project. New construction related to the project will only include street improvements, new landscaping, paving and screen walls. The standard mitigation measures included below will reduce the potential effects on the environment to less than significant. Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources, such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The • use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 27 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 7 • Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Less Than Less Lean Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by-project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. The air quality study (LSA, March 2011) completed for the project states that the proposed project only processes dry paper and metals, thus is not .anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site persons would not occur as a result of the proposed project. • Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards, During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project- specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: • 1. All,construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 28 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 8 Less • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wm Then Significant coiporiate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and • watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM" emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to • reduce PM10 emissions. Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 29 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 9 • •• Sign Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: senccam Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 8. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (No2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2,5 and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Lonq Term (Operational) Impacts Lonq Term Project Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of industrial uses in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas • consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. The Air Quality Study (LSA, March 2011) completed for the project reviewed the Long Term Operational Emissions of the project including health risks on the surrounding area (Table I). The study concluded that project would not have a significant effect on the environment including Cancer Risk (Maximum Exposed Individual (MEI)), Acute Risk (Maximum Acute Hazard Index (MNHI)) or Chronic Risk (Maximum Chronic Hazard Index (MCHI)). Therefore, project-related long-term air quality impacts will not be significant and mitigation measures will not be required. 'fable I: Summary of Proposed Project Health Risks 1 Cancer Risk • Number in Chronic Risk Acute Risk Exiosure Pathwa One Million Hazard Index Hazard Index Maximum Exposed 2.11 0.0025 0.0086 Individual (MEI) SCAQMD CEQA 10 1.0 1.0 Significance Threshold Significant? No No No Source: LSA Associates, Inc., March 2011. • SCAQMD=South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA=California Environmental Quality Act • • Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 30 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 10 Sign • ss Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wlh Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (long term) Long Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 10. Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11. Post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute • to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The.SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is adjacent to a single non-conforming single-family residence. The Air Quality Study (LSA, March 2011) completed for the project reviewed the Long Term Operational Emissions of the project including health risks on the surrounding area (Table I above). The study concluded that project would not have a significant effect on the environment including Cancer Risk (Maximum Exposed Individual (MEI)), Acute Risk (Maximum Acute Hazard Index (MNHI)) or Chronic Risk (Maximum Chronic Hazard Index (MCHI)). Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the • type of use. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. The site is located directly adjacent to Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 31 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 11 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Signcent Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a non-conforming single-family residence. The air quality study (LSA, March 2011) completed for the project states that the project will only process dry paper and metals and thus is not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, • vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with heavy industrial uses, The site is an unpermitted ferrous metal recycling facility. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. • c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 32 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga . All State Recycling Page 12 LessThen T Seas h • hen Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polanual With non Significannt I With Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) The 'City is primarily located in an urban area that does.not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere•of Influence. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) Neither the City nor the 501 are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. • 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (V) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) • resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: • 1. If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or • significant,modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 33 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 13 • Less Than Sipniticant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wit Than PP 9 Significant t corporate Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact knead • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. . • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- • Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include,•but not be limited to,the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid • removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor • of the find. • • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 34 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 14 Lass Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site currently be used as an unpermitted ferrous metal recycling facility and there are no known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or • death involving: • i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other • substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site . landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults,pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the • General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 3.5 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 35 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 15 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: goten°a'y with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact approximately 5 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw,7.5 earthquakes is 10 miles northeasterly of the city boundary and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 12 miles northeasterly of the city boundary. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code, Standard Conditions and the recommendations made in the Geotechnical Investigation Report will ensure that geologic • impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The grading and paving of the project site will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as • soon as possible. 2. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. . 4. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMI° emissions. • • c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Gravelly Loamy Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil • deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Gravelly Loamy Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 36 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 16 Less Than • Significant Less • Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With nan Significant Mitigation significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically found in long, broad, smooth alluvial fans. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project utilizes an existing septic system and does not propose any new structures or the expansion of any on site buildings that would necessitate the increase in the capacity of the existing septic system. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) (7) O ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? () ( (✓) O Comments: a) Regulations and Significance - The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created • goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N20], hydroflourocarbons [HFCB], perflourocarbons [PFCS], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]. The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles'and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-state and out-of-state) at • 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 37 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 17 • Less Tnan Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially won Tnan Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a performance based standard") (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed .through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PM10, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 is consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM10, • and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's- Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, or the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines, prescribe thresholds of significance nor a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. An air quality study was prepared for the project(LSA, March 2011)that reviewed the long term project related operational emissions and concluded that the operations would not cause a significant effect on the environment(see Tables F and G below): Table F: Project Operational Emissions Pollutant Emissions(lbs/day) Emissions Source F ROG I NOx 1 CO I Sox I PMan I PMzs Stationary Sources I 0.43 I 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 Energy Sources I 0.02 _ 0.13 I 0.12 I 0.0 0.01 I 0.01 Mobile Sources 1 2.35 1535 10.11 0.02 1.17 I 1.0 Total Project Emissions I 2.8 18.5 10.2 0.02 1.2 I 1.0 SCAQMD Thresholds I 55 i 55 I 550 150 I 150 _ 55 Significant? - No 1 No I No No I No No Source:LSA Associates.Inc..March 2011. CO=carbon monoxide I'M_y=particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size • lbs/day=pounds per day ROG=reactive organic gases NO,=nitrogen oxides SCAQMD=South Coast Air Quality Management District PM In=particulate matter less than 10 microns in size SO,=sulfur oxides Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 38 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 18 less Than • Significant Less Th Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With an Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Table C: Project LST Operational Impacts • Pollutant Emissions(Ibs/dav) Emissions Source I CO NOx PM o, I PM,s On-site emissions 9.0 —y 18 1.0 I 0.99 LST Thresholds 2,193 I_ 270 I 4.0 Significant Emissions? No I No No - No Source:LSA Associates,Inc..March 2011. Note:Assuming San Bernardino SRA(34).5-acre site.25 meter distance, CO=carbon monoxide PM,g=particulate matter less than 10 microns in size lbs/day=pounds per day I'M,,=particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size LST=localized significance threshold SRA=Source Receptor Area NO,=nitrogen oxides Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel- powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as • CO2, Ch4, and N20. CH4 are emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels: 1. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. • 2. The construction contactor shall select construction equipment based on low- emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacture's specification. 3. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Lonq Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles. CEQA requires the Lead • Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 39 • • Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 19 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wit" han Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated impact Impact document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. On January 29, 2009 the SCAQMD's working group released GHG emission thresholds for projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency. The GHG emission thresholds provide a tiered analysis approach specifically for industrial projects. The threshold requires that a project's GHG emissions be within GHG budgets in approved regional plans and that the project's incremental increase to GHG emissions is less than 10,000 MT CO2e per year. The project includes the operation of an unpermitted ferrous metal recycling facility and the construction of street improvements, new landscaping, paving and screen walls. An air quality study was prepared for the project (LSA, March 2011) that reviewed the projects GHG emissions and compliance with AB 32. The study found that the total operational greenhouse gas emissions expected from the project, using the standard CalEEMod sources for industrial uses and adding the construction emissions representing the construction-type equipment used to process the recycled material, are approximately 1,000 MT CO2e per year. This is well below the 10,000 MT CO2e per year threshold; therefore, the project will not result in a significant impact on global climate change. The following mitigation measures will further reduce the projects effects on the environment: • 7. Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. 8. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. b) The project proposes the construction of street improvements, paving, new landscaping and screen walls. The project is in compliance with the City's water efficient landscaping requirements (City of Rancho Cucamonga Ordinance No 823) which limits the maximum allowed water use for landscaping on a project site and in turn reduces GI-IGs as result of less water conveyance to the site. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The main source of pollutants will be from the operation of heavy equipment as part of the ferrous metal recycling operation. The project is an expansion of an existing operation. The existing equipment will continue to be used and handled under a normal equipment replacement/upgrade cycle. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly Bill (AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. • Rev. 9/2011 • E & F - 40 • Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 20 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wnn an Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or • • working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of • ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: • a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the sate. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. Additionally, an Environmental Site Assessment • (Stantec, September 2010) was performed on the soil of the existing ferrous metal recycling facility and found that the levels of petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and various Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 41 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 21 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wim an Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact metals in the soils were at levels well below the United States Environmental Protection Agency screening levels. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located approximately 1 mile from the nearest school. No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. An Environmental Site Assessment (Stantec, September 2010) was performed on the soil of the existing ferrous metal recycling facility and found that the levels of petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and various metals in the soils were at levels well below the United States Environmental Protection Agency screening levels. No impact is • anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Further, the site is not located within the LA/ONT Airport Influence Area (AIA), according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 % miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. The project site has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1 • Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 42 • Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 22 • Less Than • Less n cant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incarcerated Impact impact 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) requirements? • b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? • e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) •the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: . a) Water service is provided by the Fontana Water Company (FWC).The project is designed to connect to existing water services. The site does not have access to public sewer services and is on a septic system. The project does not propose any additional buildings or expansion of the existing septic system. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a • permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Rev. 9/2011 • E & F - 43 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: aatenually with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Intact Incorporated Impact Impact Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa • Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: 1. Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. 2. Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. 3. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an • NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Lin Consulting, Inc. (July 11, 2011), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 4. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 5. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and • implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities • are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 44 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 24 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With rnan Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact ,Incomorated Impact Impact . include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 6. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes • must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 7. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: • 8. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Lin Consulting, Inc. (July 11, 2011) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 9. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing • the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides, Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and • amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 45 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 25 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting information Sources: Patemlauy with man Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Imp3O All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The project is an expansion of an existing ferrous metal recycling facility and is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: • • 10. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City • Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 11. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this project, No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as • shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. Rev. 9/2011 • E & F - 46 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 26 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With nan Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable and use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located on the south site Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and • Hickory Avenue and is characterized by heavy industrial development to the north, east and west, a rail line to the south and is adjacent to a non-conforming single-family residence. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding industrial • development to the north, south, east and west. Adjacent to the project site is a one non- conforming single-family residence. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Heavy Industrial. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? • b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? • Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 47 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 27 • Less Than Significant Less With Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially gah an Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) V) ( ) O • excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (V) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels • existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out; however, there is a non-conforming single-family residence adjacent to the site. An Acoustical Impact Study (LSA, June 2011) was performed on the site and mitigation measures were recommended that would reduce the interior noise levels of the single-family residence to less than significant. Exterior 1. Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 48 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 28 Less • Lesgs n Thacan Less Th Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pptaneauy With an Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inwmorated Insect Impact • Interior:: • 2. Replace the existing doors and windows of the adjacent single-family residence with retrofit doors and windows that have a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 32 or higher to be completed within 120 • days of the approval of the project. 3. Construct an 8-foot high block wall along the property line adjacent to the single-family residence from the minimum street side setback to the southern end of the existing subterranean loading dock to be completed within 60 days of the approval of the project. -b) The proposed ferrous metal recycling facility does not use any equipment that creates a sustained ground borne vibrations. The main source of any ground borne vibration is the moving of the recycled materials which may cause very short periods of vibration that are not excessive for the Heavy Industrial District in which the site is located. As such, no impact is expected. c) The Acoustical Impact Report (LSA — June 2011) states that the onsite operations will have a maximum noise level of 86 dBA. The site is located in a heavy industrial location which permits outdoor operations that do not exceed 85 Ldn. Ldn is an average noise level over a fixed period of time, whereas dBA is an average sound level at a given point in • time. Per staff discussion with the author of the Acoustical Impact Report, the on-site Lan measurement is much lower than the maximum permitted 85 dBA. As such, no impacts are anticipated. Additionally, the project is an expansion of the existing ferrous metal recycling facility. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 4. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 5. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 6. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first • phase to be completed within 60 days of the approval of the project. Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 49 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 29 • Less Than Signl6cam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wnh an Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 7. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. • e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2% miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. • • 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. The project is an expansion of an existing use and will have a very limited number of new employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is zoned Heavy Industrial and therefore contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected. c) The project site is zoned Heavy Industrial and does not contain any residences. No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 50 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 30 • Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial • • adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) (V) O ( ) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) c) Schools? () () () (V) d) Parks? () () () (V) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) Comments: a) The site is located on the south site Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Hickory Avenue and is served by a fire station located approximately 2 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A Fire Protection Plan (Hughes Associates, Inc, October • 2011) was submitted for the project. The Fire Protection Plan made a number of recommendations to reduce the demand for public safety services (Fire Services) to the site. The recommendations made in the Fire Protection Plan and the Standard Conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. 1. The project shall conform to all of the recommendations made in the Fire Protection Plan (Hughes Associates, Inc, October 2011) including limits on pile heights (20 feet maximum). • b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 1 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, • currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 51 • Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 31 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially wun an Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incornorated Impact Impact the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? • b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: • a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 1 mile from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into . account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? • c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (.7)either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 52 • Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 32 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than • Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) O (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) . Implementation of the proposed project will generate 6.97 vehicle trips daily. The proposed project is developed with an industrial use. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each industrial uses will generate 6.97 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City • roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development • fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project will produce approximately 10 to 15 truck trips to the site on days that is in operation. The project site is within a Heavy Industrial Development District which was designed to accommodate businesses with above average large truck traffic. Additionally, in November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming • uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 53 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 33 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wnn an Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) A Fire Protection Plan (Hughes Associates, Inc. — October 2011) was prepared for the project which included a fire access plan that was approved by the City. The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project is an expansion on an unpermitted ferrous metal recycling facility and no new buildings are proposed. The project will not conflict with any adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) . wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing • facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project site is served by a private septic system that will not be enlarged by the proposed project. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by a private septic system that will not be enlarged by the proposed project. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. • c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 54 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 34 S � • Less Than han Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With pan Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the Fontana Water Distrcit. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project site is served by a private septic system that will not be enlarged by the proposed project. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the • habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other • current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. No impacts are anticipated. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop • the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 55 Initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page 35 • effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, • Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed and use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES • Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one • or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (T) Air Quality Analysis (LSA, March 2011) (T) Acoustical Impact Study(LSA, June 2011) (T) Fire Protection Plan (Hughes Associates, Inc., October 2011) (T) Environmental Site Assessment (Stantec, September 2010) • (T) Geotechnical Investigation Report (Heider Engineering, August 2011) Rev. 9/2011 E & F - 56 initial Study for DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255 City of Rancho Cucamonga All State Recycling Page.37 • • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study: ! acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further. I have revised the project clans or proposals andlor hereby agree to the proposed �?iitiga'tmp measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environrn° 'effects would occur. weer J Applicants Signature' \ � -- Date: t 1— o / (Ir I / Print Name and Title:JAf u c:l nrportolirwgimantisflowen1381458 i.doc canrportbl\rwgimanl sflower11381455_I.doc • • • • • Rev. 9/2011 • • E & F - 57 R FtS,ylVA City of Rancho Cucamonga iA%,e o MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: DRC2011-00255 and DRC2011-00254 Public Review Period Closes: December 14, 2011 Project Name: Project Applicant: James Lin for All State Recycling Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the Heavy Industrial District of Subarea 15 at 13195, 13207, 13231, 13243, and 13253 Whittram Avenue APN: 0229-192-09, 06, 04, 03 and 02. Project Description: A request to operate a 4.42-acre scrap operation and make site improvements including constructing new screen walls, installing all street improvements and landscaping, complete on-site paving and add employee eating area and parking for a project site. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is • proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • December 14, 2011 Date of Determination Adopted By E & F - 58 City of Rancho Cucamonga t - MITIGATION MONITORING Stf PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC201 1-002 54 and DRC2011-00255 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • E & F - 59 Mitigation Monitoring Program Project—CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00254 and DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00255. Page 2 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. . 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of • construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to • hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • E & F - 60 as C o • o m= tfri EN:', O F. r".Etr, U 0 ,. 1!(:- o o ' ' • _ _ V as 0 ., : v v v v V N Z .``;''' N N N N N N as .". a) C > ❑ CU 1— Q "01 aS 0 1-11-4.=k r rd-. N s C o,-; r •= Yiy. CI t U 0 0 0 0 N an 'v, ^ > Inr a U a a a a r to m- cell H _ s- z U) a7h: y [ N c c c N J . Q 0 1 N c c c C a i- ' w O et,' 0- a CO a CO CO H as O o m t r g 0 0 `o o `0 0 V rnU ;�e= 3 Z c t ._ 5 5 v 5 awl. 41■0 F- ° O m >, r —J E _ c' '= 'r r Y w Cu 4W-Cr • U = d 5:S.7' o 0 _ 5 u. y U U 0 m U U o D, ry:Ty 0 ,n a Z_ . o . 0 as „ow 1. , N ra,; m F- r co " klik., 0 a 0 m m m a Z c - ii N ca _ N �r ocomcvico � 2Cf° aaEoa' c0ica -�'o� 0 - +,' '; O' O ... COa '� UEL' - 0003 c0E Co 2J 'L Z p d '; .S 0t o u 2 �L � � o � m E o c dQ .� o Op 'O3.. 0 " ;c Cn 0 J cow -. o _c > o U = - Z ,; v a c E o ) v o & 2 t (tL La rn m ' C ' = o a' 0 .C) o a' -o '> w ° 0 a' a CT a' L E F- a of c.' w a a Q) v >.d a L 0 L to :a a' ca a; E C � -0 N a C Q > '.tea '` C U C T N ( , (a (U - .a CO 0 N O CO 3 0 0 C U' 0 rx. e .0 � a' o -N a c -t-5 vLa) co ao '- v E ?^o U N z,: a o oU) N .- c aCo F- c as ;?,' E - °C) : mcaa0 aka axu m - E o -0 r- (a o N m; :- U (a a1 U /1 U - V' `o a U U c tT CO N _ s. i y N •o N J N N J N C C N [= 0 a1 L 45 QI o U c m c v o D 0 E 2 .c U a) ori o 0, c > m U 'O er c in Caa 0omgE - Ow - dr x .- 0 0 ct d z j3 dN0 EL W U) 0Q) a0m .c -4- v0 a' :it vv 0 0.cc ca c i w r� J O o U N fUn boa c n N 0 - E 'o c 0 co E c a 23 23 i '3¢ o o O' O " Na li tl. a' La °- - NNQC ow aj � N f0 - a) >- E2 0o > Ec Z Cl- m ca '� i c c l- @ aUh S' - o .O E O i i �` o' (Dona - 2 c v o L N > �.s o 0 o '6 a� 2 ' c U La and ova w o d _ €`1 ' i' U c C.) > y N o E o -c `p G A = -00 - 0 r w U .0 0 ED a L • 7 = c ,,:^ ,: 2 ov c min - d �a Co J E c o U N IIHIVID o a 0' O E U d U .Q`- a C OI N -c C N V O N O o >^ -aa)i o U !' N Co c 0 U a oc 'c a Ca av' 0 ao cc Ow, c. aa) cu 3 = 0' om - -° 03 - o - 5a' .- C E -:* a o a' o E5 'm a v v J 0 5 .SoU m a m u a c aEC o . E & F - 61 • 0 0 i c o m ` c E v0 0 • c co o v c v v co t N N N V 7 V C V V V N a) m -0 C CD =. I- N 1 W CD CO C . p O a co 0 0 • s4= a, 0 U 0 2 > a s a Q Q Q C C C 0 0 • co C co co co C C CD CO CO m C C ,� 0 a s oa o. C C C C o CO CO O O O O ° co =w m m a3i a3 i m2 o) 2 rnt 02 . 0) 2 3 3 c vi ,C N C N ,C N C N N N > > > > E N N N N N = 0 ' o J O = 0 O 0 N N f- > ❑! z cc rt 00 0 ° 00 Co Co K it C) T C o • 'r. C 0 0 r 7 r E Er O m O • 5LL U U 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) N C `o . C 15 ti C C O O a2 in a) 1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . z ° m m m m m m m m m m m O O O C N U CO O a L N N a N 0 . 0 O U m m Y N 0 O C -0 c co ° w N N O >§ co .- O O L O 0 of ? N N n .75 CD � a) c ° a > ma) 0292 Uai m Tr. = 0 L mCLO _cc ° � m a mho ° a 2y ID ° = oo E co ° aa) uoo) 3a ca � � ° � 00N � v = 3 aN my E .0 m � E .co m o .4 o Q ° c0a t ao N co o , ° °' cui � � 1- aa) .- 0i ENE N °) E = � f6 v a y N L co co rn `N cc CO m > m 2 N c o O N -0 al N N O N .L.. 0) C O c L -O T.0 p N N - ° a a) C N L C . y d N O .O C L m ` N L m O O co cn O N Vl > m d '=O O. 0 " m ° m m C N C O O C O m C >, L.. c .0 'j N = o m 0 C E E L N p U O @ L - N N CCS co E -o NNc oc° .°1 c —° midN aorn CV ° —' 3 X O o'C 'O N O T a N 0 U o > N o 'b w C 7 c is 0) o- v m _CdCC E m -o o 5 to .= c 0 N v) O@ to U V N C N N n U N °i N o O' N N CO L-Z = > a > 0 -0 0- g U ° Vl ° N acoM E N -° w 2 ° . a.? 2 '0 0 N a N O - O O N a) O — U — ° a) 0 > > N co t a) a U N ° a'- i +.. m c > @ N L N m = ° °c_) ° d- E ° la T ° d '=) m •co c N Q 3 U T o).� m _ >i - N y m 'O N N 'C N N L m •....M D N .0 ° C C N n = co `O) 0 ate ° ° c � NULEo � a° 0 Eg0 Imo •'o2EO � N 200 C C O O N a N t N a °) O) 2 C a m 2 N m a 0 0 o N N 2 w C C N • O N > to m = a` a 0 _C N c o .E a-0 < C -- m N m U C O m m co .2-n c > o o = rna O _cm ci) aa)) 3 Omo Wool- o W OUi 2 co = v°) al -Ea.) Q mCJ � ° 0E co ° m ; r2 • • • • • • L ' > N L - = O F- m3a. cn Um `m2 H CO F- o o E & F - 62 o o - ';. a c E { O O • U C R O V V R V C O V (A 2 N N CO M CO CO al To TS me F a) L CD t5 rc, > O Al:>r r C # O O CI m 2`" O O _ .0 F A ! :ti U U a a a a > a Vi a i.,;¢_ 0 0 ° 0 :.- ; ,c a a a a So on °;;. 2 2 a 2 m.5 .R O O #0': O O O O C 01 0 C a a) - -ilf a) a) N N -p;-.--;- i 'c > > > > > > E a) a) a) FL:t4a a) a) a) a) Yh- 07 >. Vin: C C � ? •` C %gip,', O m 3. M • 0li U U kilit U U U U (h CO gyj i 12 16 a a2 r m m m m aa) w LO a - a a mO m 0 � a 0.. a d we rah; w _ _ a) N CI -Ri: N U U R R n cr c R U Q U 2 m C c m a) .- 14--i- u) a 2 O P O — O c co a) o f O O ca R cs)a.> T 'yea 00 - 0a)N >+ 'y a ` y j )n W E N O Q p) CO N 3= U) ` Y E a) c a ° co a) 0 :O O n U p) a) O C 2 m O R V 'p R• b' o o o O R c c E a)a a) C , ,, 0 N o u O C cu N n ' .o . a � o o d o a� a°) L ° E 076 g o --• O a m o u o . 0.w v o o u teo ° Eco C o _ 2 a ao � � 5 W a) i ' 0 O a) _ -O m R ° a) - C U mN LO x cocoa' m p• r c O to a j 5. c a)cc 92— O o co C -O c E O U ` O 3 c c c Ol - - Q 'm C e ¢ r m a °° m w ® - o o a = Eoo z a � - c c fl ® o d = ° £ T ( O U a - r a) 0 C R O O _ O R ° _ Y o > E m N a»' ° o n U E E a > R '• n Ll .c o m o 0 o `m 1) L C N `` o oy E '0o a) - o U > c N 4 Q C c • 'O U -o L 0 U a) Ca) U ' U E -O j C R° = L O � ° W a) N E N p O N Q R _ a V) fa.c 70 .0 0 - E C (a E - O R E 3 a) N -NS a) t o 0 0 =) C O ca O O ,- N a) C 00:01 (13 9) ) = v O <^a) : a N « m - „ -0 O o O N R c U a)• O d N 3 c -� Q ) o O R a a) N v a) U u) N ° a) m � Hull' m oy mo I Ra) m ca' L` o > ri r. mz � > p —> w v 3 R U Cv � n R i m a o N 0 ;4_,,-; (0 0 inn as U' = o Rn `m . E & F - 63 0 a 1 = • O m a c E o o •� U CC o ? d) Z m V V V m m . y m to 1 MI CD _ F m 1 -I+ • CD m > n C `D 0 a m o 0 s 2 > a 0 0 0 0 0 r r 0 0 0 0 a a ° a )a a a a = a d m a O o 0 O O o E `m a> aa)) - 0) a) a) I- > CC CC c CC C4 D) T = U C = O a) - = =Cr • E )• i U m CO ao 0 0 rn d c P O N w _ = O 0 a5 re a o. a 0 a a 'C-O U & 2_,E. fa L o o f%) O o d a) o - L CO t U) N a) t " 0 o O m ,�T, C _ _ oo m `O p a 'C CA o a) o p N - ..+ m 3 .E m .j m ... > U) "O C J � a O V E m c E N � a.- E o -. -o .`z 3 aa)) c0i 0 O m -o 'w c ,- m 3 V c .4r a`a0 ir) o m ° m o o E m a� c 0 r, cn > >..E o co E emu) E � c 'o � a � `0)in E m m v � m '� � � 'N '� � o,v � m � � m o E o• D) (a «O, m o m o) a) a= .c �!n .E " o m .D C m :o 'O `m m c 'U c aa) 3 a 43 d a.CO o .0 L 3 c m o o C aJ m 2 -E E ° 0 0 0 0 � t a co CO CU NEm ai -0c at- m0 -, .o .E0 a ma0FEo 00 a Uwa• U) Z, U 0 m (� " o 0 a T'L-' o C C o N O .J. m -O N Y E C N O O m U N O a,c-... U O = Y (n C U O a co m co E E ›,-.p _c L L m .p E a) m a) m o > ` oL ° J o -0 a) ) c rngp c .J0 co a- .c -5 m `o E J m m E Z r o n co - po .d �C a o 0 m � 3 a) 2 a) 2 E ° ° p N C ?, p W d '- CO �O w N O)�' N CA m -O C c W J J 'N a O O O 0..- E d N C O CO -O o w C a) C O c ,Z, U CO p O a) Z o m o O tn.° 2 Q o o .- 0 .- U ° L.. _ o O a) E N `p o 'C .c N (/) O a„ 0 'c a c .B a m C 0 E 0 3 ? m 0 > y O c m c m a 7 V L O o 'p) C C a) ° c o a) 6 w2 2 Z L e _ a N 'C ,Z,.- a) E m F E) N U m O J 'N j a N N O W a) (0 m V) _0 V) - C Ca C J E mu) 2aEEWrn 0 o '= 0 '- EaLEs aoo .c 'w - = -° oc a cocoa)) '- uu , Qis .0 - O C U W a) U U O p Ta a J O) = c a) a) m m N N N � w a) a 0co 00 a°) mca� c°) ' E0 aa) � ° ma`) ? 0 aa)n oa • _ = ioEo Ela) .> m o E2 `" °' mE ca@ -o LN - E a >' E om 0 c m .- m 0 0 c m c m E a EE J a J a m '- L L a co O U O L N m Cn .52).0-.E C J 3 To E a) o a) m ` ` a ` J U p_ O C 05E .= O ° -5-c C W U m J L U a N D)a, a 'O a m O Q m >, V) O U u) a= N O` a U) p..- J L N «_, a m u, > C 0 m '0 m a o Q d E (o `o a) = m o a -00 a 0 VW ° 2E oOOELa °) a� o • - "O 0 a W U) E m ,- • E & F - 64 U O !! 0 E &�_`_„,,,,,,, • U U r mO ,..,,,:,3, 0 Z v e v v , m it''- '0 C `,, m C C w .), N 10 a ' > S $;?=.it Ca”?. O IS w 9 -0 m ',,,A0,. o m vks:, r, car, :. E > wm' a • a a a Ewa p(41 i C c c C C C w O O O O O 0) U filiT c, 2 O) = O)2 01E EC w R... C y C y C N C N k % ' c C c a . P > 0 o o ° c 0 o' O ral C U a'x•as G O • O m liz U 0 U U to 0) 4 cep. C O E-1 Vii o O AVM La as ' o O o rY w ' m m m m S" * mop o) CO 2a o aE aca) c C C O L) s 4' , :N >, a O 2 'N O` (a `. O rt' 76 �'�t'n"':'M+ ft,' -0 0 . 2 m O >. c O 0 m O 6e:1°, 0 m c a ( -O O L 'N O' C ... .0 0 L m O 0 O O N V o E a, a) U O a` 3 as a) o a) tn () E O U O C -Go O.". cc '4 0" Y 2 U ' C U a) a) m ` �..,W N m 0 fT a) U a) a N N > c O O L cu o Yr ' 3 m O L L 0 a) C a O co ', .Ca c 'o L i c a .E m m� o ° 7 y 3 a '- L., fn a r -o moo m 0 N C g"'s5 11 u) c 3 3 a w a s a`) a.-J-- JamS. N N N a) N L a) -O 0 E L C 7 l Rtle fn C t N .0 CO C L a) . InQ a: a) � E co .N m - Z` o- N 3 n3n c )U C) ':,tn; -0 j a) ' 0 .V co y ; N t N t4 - c O 1,2 °o, w ag "2 o c a °) y m 0 0 X � o • ;a m d co a) a) c E ' 'a L 'tam: a) o C co= O ` of N 0m .5 E � m o_ .� c av °o 22 ID � o cU 'EU m o x. a4.a)y; -cm� = N o5EEo Eav L > 2E 5= O;'; I- fa CC m Lk w a) I— o CD o S OX o E & F - 65 D m ia1 c E 0.;; U ;y U Ill N m O r ! co Z : N N N N N N N N W m Y" a c a) r_ f s- m as m , > O r,' °a, o ry, ti 0 t :I= Y t k4 0 a a 0 0 '2 > , a a F N N C C N n _ e;� m C C N r C_ Cu Co Co m Cu m m kip, � 2 M a a a a a a a a .YY D 'm - o 0 0 `o `o o `o `o 4 a 0 EE y :1/4,2„, .> a> > > > > > > 7 _ ° . t" ID m .f. y�Y 4 .- co• J • O m tr 1441 O it rem m co co co m m m C7 rk u O C Wta _ _ D O y# O cn L5 d' w m CC co CC C] C7 co m0 $` :h ,j a ,1? .. C m •N _ N O OCI L .LO.: t0 C O L 'O N O O O J O m N L ‘4,••••-r,';,yk a j N N C 3 L r N 3 N a >`a' C m .� s � L.. d C m y C NJ N t N m N C m U ° O N O O 0 ,c d u) o o C > fi L ca N ° o o a0 E a m c o `.. j' y C C O Q'-O C m - a C N C N O V = m "j N al O) a N '- CO .4 U J a) O N co V m N N "`er:� tc - � v L .NaUC o Eo o > c u, .-L. c j m 3 mEm2 J as N c _o a) 3m o r; Z �7 �= a s �+ � m o a � c 'm v -o - 1.= u) @ - o =+ W = .w.. E . a) a, 0 & c c m _ C o a) v ° inn o m as CO) C7k a) 0 E0 . o m J L V2 L 0 0 'O m a3 H - N d C V W o U =''a;; N Q y� m O o1 L y C N T N .m a pa J - O ,O o N o ? m'. m o c ° ° wV ,n o a� o0 - -o U m cm m rn nE E r m co ° •c'co c w E N c .c w t c v E: .c o v'; = W ! fn � � 'VC N rJ- O cN mN Our � N c+.w LO_ = :7•7•6•• im N U Q O1 >, fn •C t al y L a) m C� J v U OI m (Ja m. • D al ,�:. 'p rnU D) C Y C N a) m m U N > 01 U J O N > C N �� m y ;lb `Q.0 (n E N V °U E >`5 m Vl N m o L L C 3 0 ° Co :::0=).' :v DI io U V - J aOl J Y E O L co = t E D. :411),, a1 .0 t 2 .50- o ] 0 C a) C U C N N C Y O N 2 _00 .� > m ,C U m a3 c m 2 .- J m m U u! C 'Oi EE „E7.` I- 2' 3cNm HaiaciE.�'. E HE Q2w Ua Km EmU C5 0 -z E & F - 66 V . _ O W • "' a c E o 0 • U C a1• 0 V V V V cr Q U) Z N N N N N N u) of • 'O = a) C t a) Z — d O > 0 C O w a tel o 0 at 2 > a 0 as 0 a N N N N in • in C C C C C C M CO It CO CO It = a a a a a a w_ o O m `o `o o `0 0 0 a) m a) a) ' ac w a) a) ) a) E > > .> .> > -> • 0) >, Cu r. = r O ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ r • od U U U 'U U U 0 5 LL m m m m m m 0 DI a) = •12 O To = _ _ O O a2 co • L 0' w m m m m m m • C y C a) O E E -'to [A O C 'O 'C CA th O)5 O n^ a) j N E (n C 0 o co � L"' � u) C U Q O L .0 E • w O � C C O � � U � ,_CO 0 a) N 7 a)` C Cn"' .co . N-0 '° a 0 0 (a O C 0 as (a 0 3 O zn L O• t U CO 3 0 O C O - a) CL N >. o o` 0 u) CA O E 0 0 N a) U a 0 O' a) co C E L a) > (n W C C , a 0 'o a'c O .0 C co O L N ° c u°_ _c E o co__�o '� - o c ° y m o E ° ° ° ° ° ° o aant. u5 � , u) o ,oa) omm.- w ECO c > - c .a @t Dag aim m0 � 8NUo3 - �u°i ° ° Lm„ ° ° as d 0 a) 'O 0 a) a- O E a N 1] E3a3o 3m �� � 2o ° 0.2rdEE .c0_ Na) c `0 nE 0 of 3 ° a) ca ' o tn .E � mo ,.. o o 65 .0 N O E N t O N t � �.. 1] a) E n ° a1 o C 0 (0n C O ? r. _@ a in o CO m0 ° E ° '� .c °-'5 o c o c ,co >. (a .0a as E u) E ... � ' 0 o " ._ cc � E Z Cam C O N O c co - co.°- N C co C -- a 4 -c co E C .O .fa N C co �) Y � = E d oa) cm 0 0 ._ m0 - a) a 'o -0 wc �- E ° c°)) Eioa) E ` =ou°i •-6 aNj O N U a N N N O) > C h V! t c (n .° '0 U C a) E C O a�'" o - 3 UE ca) @c .� c (oa) wa) cEm .° ° oE Ca) OS = V U U l0 0 a) 0 0 CO t 0 « a) O O N C E '� C `J > u) W ttl a .E C@ CA m -O N — a) > K b C'C a) 0 C a C 0 0 L U (q ' N Z, O t E C O T U U O C w -0 U a) C O a) a) C O a) O x u) a) E O)d L _ t "' O a'� ` N a) C O a) a) co ° t .. _ U a) C C ° O r N C C N O a a] m N c E 0 a) C C V) 0 a) U C O • py ° oE � Y � a) Naom = OE o � 0 ° - nmo5 ° tit; --o in ° na° O E o c o � `o ° m u° E o 'nt ' n E m o It ° an ° E mo u° v o ° CO m ° w -CO d N O O C C O _ N �. _ ° C ' LLI N .0 a C ° C O) 0 It c -C a > c = z ._ E t `o m m c m c E w 0 a) m '> (n aa T•- ° m a) ._ .c -o s . E a) O O C S a) L n o Y Ca) Ea) U L a) O .E c UL O y 0 to .N O 2_ ❑ d 2 a. W u t d N n U Q av, co f- E o) EI Q .E •ru U 3 O u) -° .° E & F - 67 a) 0 i L • o E Q c E o o • 0 C C• m O Z 7 V V CO Z N N N N 0 TO a C o C • a) a) i > 0 C O O a m O 0 t w 5 > a 0 0 0 in U) n) to . m m a) c L ° m w .2 a a a O '- `o 0 `0 0 co en 0 c— m a) a) aa)) m I- >tr K CC a) ca >-, C o t L Co r C C 0 0 0 0 - • L• t. OD ¢1 V U 0 m 00 0) a, C 4 O L C O 0 o.2 re m m 0 m NC 0 aj 'C E g N o o m —O o O C co m ° 0 ° — "C co .D co V) to -O (n 0 "O U x N N c 0 .?^a u) m o.0 a) x m .0 a m w m = a) V) 0 m m N V 0 0 a) m Naci ° 2 cc`ainE gmaa)) Td )naO7 cacaai ca � '° o ca>> 'EE ;oaaio ' 'y ° m ° L .ow `o u mfl E ` (� a E '> � a 0 c c m y � E � ° a `oo .m ° a � ° ° a _c c0 ° a E x N o ° - C � mxE ° y ° mma2cco mooaomccE W a N O N m a m a) m co m et J 5 a a O) 3 E O. C m o o 'O ' ro ? � C � C d •N y a c m ° 'Z 3 0 0 > U a) c c ° U 0)J O m 4_ m O L C C > _o co a)aa0 0 aa)) aai ? d N � a�OC c .no a� d � � 0 - 1 a) mo) • " -0 Y N E O) O I) — E -O m m 0 _ fn "� m C: L O OQ) U mma >. m 'C 'V .EmEm mQ) v0] C L ° � 0 Z E .��. °' mdc Eacc°)ao,� '° � .� mc°) ONay ms wC o v .E2 � .� m 'aa Ewa � ° a � a � mmU 3• a ° m m ° (73 >., 0 -0 C N E O N j 1] W C "C j 0 d N m 0 m ° '0a 3m r � E cD0) -0 — a o � a) oa) � rE0 Q ° ° m ac :0cCDc > m E a .c a s 0D) E .00m o mumm o `aa UUm -° - mLEo ° _ = r _ 0 a) 1/4.2 m aa)) mo �. m ? y ca @30 � �a � � O N ° 3 � e ea`) �a � 'ao) -.0V 2oC m mcm � 7m • y 0) m > atom m .5 co Em w ° 2 ° aEac0O- Q1.0 aL.. '° m .0 U N O` N p N D 3 .N O .>". a N N .V m m > E o .0 = E , ai .E a .E E '- .0 d '? U =� E O m m n % 9 m o t m c m .0 > ° .O n O N 2 a) m O Z m �_ Coma a) a J oon a) :E E E a d u) O -°corn - ac ° -E E & F - 68 O .. L O m 0o Cf IE m o v N To w '6 L a) C F a) C. > O ~.a LI TO 'AV O y y U • a > a '"a^' Q Q Q 4 to R,4 = d !%°' C C C C o W O I '� .O O O IM 0 i fb)-'-A+ O) 2 01 2 0) 2 0) 2 L— a) n. C ` > )n C .E N C N E C E w m Pk' o O 0 = 0 , 0 H > m r 0 o D o D O' D o P c• V O r r H o y )• p aU em ` m U U U U 0) s Olit To :44 L L 4 O o CL a 0 f i O 0 0 0 re 0 m t m d d m 1 E a� md m - �_`m ---ti aZ - ,-- oo c3 (jo CE C1(O CD 01 E C co 2) mU C '%''",■ O .0 C O = N U G H ° _ 'N C a i<° E o m -0 ..e.,E . c ° `w-' °U o ,, w m m 5%,:i m a y0 o f :o_C x L a) — o E o C) Cl.) L C C� ,> co o c m v°i o ° 'E . m r a CO w o U o a 3 CO o m 3 m aU ctomo5 ° 0 �' oro m Eo o U o-.c CD `L w a i, o v)Z ° p mo Z L"' _ o r"-: b o ot_ ti) cam C (0 t c — m G) w O ° - m = c � cZZoa, .n '+ '' °c0cu5 �cumi ° oC an avm a°= m o m � .n -- N !t. o CO .5 0 -0 ' -o o ° m o a) 3 C .L.. �.. c v=i N r a.-1-"'T`,.%' C a CO N `° c -c y_ N w o c E O % c >. aaoi D m � Y � re, c °o > a° cam amrE 3 'v, 5oo c° E -moC _, C o C Td W — a) t14,-, O O 5 O N C O u O — 0 @ 0 m E m o 0 0 co L � U o Twy a m o [i m 'o O to m 'o o N m Ast^?� 0) m o m S m ' ° a) o a) L O c Z L cn m N O 1 O d > b x, L a cn C `a •- O ° N f/7 O w E O) N c a o .0 m y o o .c � co o m o , ! w 0 :0 � m o a D o ` o m'T 0 0)0 c 1r E = 0 a) mocEomE E oforO ,_ 0 0c � rraa) om� � > Em >" oQ c o U E o .- 0 a) , ;._ m e vi o 3 N N7N ,E .010 ° .E m m o 01E o a1 to m — rn_ co o -Z 1aa _ (t O O (° m -x N .ct 00 O a a.. E N 2 .E w c U m e .O c .,::.- a C�'O o ° a) . W m >` E o ° -c N C o O Co m • ES' w w .E m 0 2 GOO O O . N i- t JZ 3 m N > ' ° -822 c 9 . ° w' E co N E E a) .0 m ` v-,t w O) 0 01 N c m > 0 0. ` C N 7 m M t o O °-L O c w m C C w'1 — tit,' - -5 2 C .D a O)... c1 m 00 -52 ‘a m c N 0 la E 0- - O a) o = O .0?". = m O 'J w m u) a) C m - a) ° a) >. 'd O am30Umo mU •2.; m `o0uaaE2' � 'v) w ° -r Ummwo L (i) E & F - 69 of U f0 . � 11O. a 0 0 0 6r�9 �3�t*+ LL a U = C 4f" : c m o Ia O r- 'EWA,' ` 2i. p - a) •Nfit p ri v m 5 W 0 m C jj N N Vf ` 0z m m !AM 'N , p> O N:• N M C w o `1(n r ''O a ..Y`` -esT O •••P•". L I- -: C > Q v`"1": 5 CD 0 p EFL: ii4c_i iLxi • a Li:a a c c c ''. c p p . p U O U •E ...- "Co c O C t N teal'tl W U C_ a) O p ...7 O p a j o S�� "a a) 0 F > ❑ U ❑ p a U S ❑ ±r-1 c a, U t7)-.: v Q U r C U .il 30i, L Y -L O O a d a • , c Q m U r c a w o 0 Ca u O •2i 0 U a U Ea - c c- c 00 0 Ff: . O . v . 0 C5 m m °ALL, Z o U La a) 0 0 ❑ O O BI U 'o w m a a a S.q- w 1-- m _ =of L... ° a) C C >-..1= `t a) 4 C CO CO m O) j,V C C a) O „�.,fk a) 0 •:• >> O a > O -0 0 -L . N 0 CO .0 C m 0 0 0 .c v yH2". C C O ;"c[i LL F v .Uoa_' D € a) from > caawmooc ;�k .° — o o " " , 0 CO > a) '5 0 3 L aj.-2 a) v N ° .0 N 2 .off l— r m x.,)2 ON � Q m U x ❑ 'o a) 0-0 Op c p No c .0 m -O c 'E a) a) c ' ',. m VI', a) V c o O m a) u, as .E m vi c m o o m m �9.��,! '-' F,?,�v O O ° a) — 1`) f, C V .0 'O V C .0 a O ° ° 0 > 0 3 =a E U) L .Y.93, a)if,C U .0 >.0 m O C CO 2 _c m . >i m O O` V ��� E w .O1 * C —>,Y >,L o m . CO .5 v v a) v is O C ° "'' o Q m `�:a3 m m C c �a y L V •A if, C ` 3 m c C C = E1 �t. U en C {n a s a) a 3 CD E E c Nmm O 0 •CO w � °- ; o 'moami'tL0 ter ,°—' {. 9 m E o E o m .S �' > N o d Y c �L .� m p ovakk y ma ry,yy > o 0 `o a� � m > .o 2 o aa, °- m ° -o ° -C 92 m c ai t� o ? 0 ,G x-,.. a) m a>i o-� a) o 01 c m a) 0 o c a) o °- c o .i `y:a m m = o ` '? o u, ❑ c t_, .- ns >, a) _ a) m crm4mws ,9 oaF p ' c C o v o c e .0 E a) a) L m -0 W ..o _ O c tl) p L o L a) Y C — a7 "r.a' c cn N co Z C c 0 v m O ,c c r C m — O m .c ° 0 . 2 c yi.' E .o O > �, _ E 0 c•y c 2 _ N C O 0) m V v m p ® V C mC 2 g) d C N V e "^K O U C C4 Si d a .m y O '0 -p m co .0 C C 0 a) m ID 0 0 >> Y N n, 0 C .0 O p O- C ky.�A C - = 2 ttp N O N rn � .o ° O m -2 E O ' m m m �`cm 0 `—a 4,f o o a k ° a INa Q °)'p fE/1 C o C 5 K 'E a) '� C ° 0.-s > E N am) o a>) c,.L. > ; 4 a C . . & CI `o 00 1° 12) p Qm ° N ° 0m a) a c ,m ` o '� ac ,c °v m ° ,N ea, LL- w 0 D �' w G N a7 L N L 0 a w V Ct v) a) Oa C �fi N LL Y N" _ c • L C O ❑ mO �wON > .oE mC > Y00 ='C"-JC7) a) hL Ua) O ° a2Emo,til w 0 ` -0 ` N c ON o N co a) o U° E a) O` ` >. N , a) C d N L a.) a) -L-, N E L N: E 'c W ai at al L O O O O O a) D a ° O .m O w �" O.0 a) 0 V ,c,, U 0 D Er) a) CCO — COm C N (7, a) Na aNm = ` y -0 -CNa °i aD O 'X O . CL Op O C 0 L 70- ° 0 O c 0 0 0 0 > 0 O o m O V O N :. m f:''',2'; p 5 = Uin � wEHEEc ° cOt) Fa.L.. 2rvQ ° 'ino. aa)i °c O=_'1FEOE Y , 0 a_ 0 ■ E & F - 70 C • m N O • o o a T-- a 0 U o v c c s o a Co '6 ▪ w w cc cc 0 V N up n b C N T- /73 w v 0 in N 0 0 a 0 E a 0 U N m a O • Q T 'F• • 0 C O 0 n of E .; o • y c a O O O W m o N c C m c N m 9 C O O N FT O C 9 (T, O a o` O ca v rn U r C • p • o m a iL O O m a E & F - 71 • RESOLUTION NO. 11-64 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00255-A REQUEST TO MAKE SITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING CONSTRUCTING NEW SCREEN WALLS, INSTALLING ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND LANDSCAPING, COMPLETE ON-SITE PAVING AND ADD AN EMPLOYEE EATING AREA AND PARKING FOR A 4.42 PROJECT SITE LOCATED WITHIN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT OF SUBAREA 15 ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WHITTRAM AVENUE BETWEEN PECAN AVENUE AND HICKORY AVENUE AT 13195, 13207, 13231, 13243, AND 13253 WHITTRAM AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0229-192-09, 06, 04,03 & 02. , A. Recitals. 1. James Lin, for All State Recycling, has filed an application for Development Review DRC2011-00255, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On December 14, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on December 14, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: • a. The application applies to a request to do site improvements related to the permitting of a ferrous metal recycling facility; and b. The subject property is zoned Heavy Industrial; and c. The property to the north is zoned General Industrial and is developed with a vehicle storage facility;the property to the south is zoned Heavy Industrial and is undeveloped; and, the properties to the east and west are zoned Heavy Industrial and are developed with a vehicle dismantler and a vehicle storage facility, respectively; and d. The subject site improvements are required are required as part of the approval process for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00254. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the • above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: E & F - 72 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 11-64 DRC2011-00255 - JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 2 a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the • Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or the • improvements in the vicinity; and c. The application,which contemplates operation of the proposed use, complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: • a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all • comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and the conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein • by this reference. E & F - 73 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 11-64 DRC2011-00255 - JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 3 • Planning Department: 1) Approval is granted for site improvements related to the operation of a 4.42 acre recycling facility at 13195, 13207, 13231, 13243, and 13253 Whittram Avenue -APN: 0229-192-09, 06, 04, 03 & 02. 2) Install street improvements including curb, sidewalks, landscaping and pay utility undergrounding in lieu fees for the Whitram Avenue frontage, including the frontage for the single-family residence and vehicle repair shop. 3) Construct an 8-foot high decorative wall with a decorative cap and view obscuring metal gates along Whittram Avenue and between the project site and the single-family residence. 4) Construct 8-foot high painted metal screen walls along the east and west property lines and along a portion of the property line separating the project site from the single-family residence. These metal screen walls will not be visible from the Whittram Avenue right-of-way. 5) Construct an 8-foot high tan precision block wall with a decorative cap along the south property line adjacent to the rail road right-of-way. • 6) Construct an employee parking area, outdoor eating area and upgrade the existing bathroom facility. 7) The parking area shall include a perimeter landscape planter that has a 5-foot minimum wide interior dimension and includes a 12-inch step out curb where a parking space abuts the landscape planter. All parking stalls shall be a minimum 9-feet wide and 18-feet deep and be double striped. 8) Upgrade the existing on-site covered work areas. 9) Pave the entire site and add a vehicle scale along the south property line. 10) Upgrade the windows and doors of the single-family residence in order to reduce the indoor noise levels to City standards as recommended in the Acoustical Impact Report (LSA — June 2011). 11) Conditions 2 through 11 shall be completed in the following time period from the date of this approval or revocation procedures for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00254 will begin: a) Walls and gates— 2 months b) Noise mitigation for the single-family residence— 3 months • c) On-site improvements (paving, parking facility, outdoor eating area, upgrade of covered work areas) —4 months E & .F - 74 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 11-64 DRC2011-00255 - JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 4 • d) Street improvements and landscaping — 6 to 8 months 12) Print a copy of this Resolution of Approval on the plans when they are submitted for Plan Check. 13) The facility shall be maintained at all times, including making necessary repairs as needed, and keeping the site free from trash and debris. In no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 14) The applicant shall obtain all the necessary permits from the Building and Safety Department. 15) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Conditions, Health Departments, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. Engineering Department: 1) Lot line adjustment to be recorded by San Bernardino County. Please submit proof of recordation. 2) Install public improvements on Whittram Avenue per City standards,to • the satisfaction of the City Engineer, including but not limited to the following: a) Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk & drive approaches as required. b) Remove existing street lights on wooden poles and install three(3) 9500 Lumen HPSV street lights on concrete poles. c) Provide existing R26 "No Parking" signs, or replace as required. d) Provide traffic signing and striping as required. 3) Install drive approaches and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size, shall be of a species and spaced in accordance with the City's street tree program. b) Street improvement plans, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. c) Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing • completion of the public improvements, prior to the issuance of a City building permit. • E & F - 75 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 11-64 DRC2011-00255 - JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 5 • d) Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. 4) Per the Driveway Policy, driveways requires the following: a) A minimum width of 35 feet for Commercial or Industrial drive approaches 5) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electricity) on the opposite side of Whittram Ave shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount time the length from the center of Whittram to the project boundary. 6) Install pavement transitions within the existing rights-of-way,to the east •and west of the project site, with asphalt curbs to contain street run-off that extend to adjacent drive approaches. Obtain permission to remove the existing fences and other private improvements from street right-of-way. Reestablish private improvements beyond right-of-way as needed. • 7) Development Impact Fees: NONE-Development Impact fees are associated with building permits. No fees are due at this time. (FEES SUBJECT TO CHANGE) Building and Safety (Fire): 1) The project shall comply with the Fire Protection Plan. Obtain the necessary operating permits from RCFPD for a recycling facility and Hot Work Operations. Submit for plan check approval and obtain a building permit for the facility improvements. Mitigation Measures: Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide • evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction E & F - 76 PLANNING C■-• MISSION RESOLUTION No. 11-64 DRC2011-0025'- JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 201 Page 6 •. - measures + posed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)`-\ well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and co- ings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD,'ule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied ti either by hand or hig olume, low-pressure spray. ' - 4) All asphalt shall meet o -xceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. •. — 5) All construction equipment shall �mply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and v . `'" 403. -Additionally, contractors shal dude the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the co ruction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul'r:-ds. • • x.. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of .-,se areas to erosion - ,. over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of expo, -d excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance` h local Ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • • • • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City i s'.':is.carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as _ .r result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or - cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6)„., The site shall:be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing .agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board - [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM-10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. -.-7) ; Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall -be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PKo emissions. 8) iThabonstruction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel - = - powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure- that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment'when not in use. ,w •_ E & F - 77 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 11-64 DRC2011-00255 - JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 7 • 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to•establish its archaeological value. r. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as,a theme or focal point. -- • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the aria. • • Prepare a`mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effection significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, includR g but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping z. or co ringsites with soil, planning the site as a park or green spat or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prep a technical resources management report, documenting' the i entory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources • withi he project area. Submit one copy of the completed•report with ' riginal , illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Arch ologicai Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any pieontological resource-(i.e. plant or animal fossils).are _! encount d:before or during grading, the developer will .retain a —'—? qualified 'aleontologist- to monitor construction activities, to take' appropr m�aeasures to. protect.or preserve them_for study. _ The ' . _ paleont gistgshall-submit a report of findings that will also provide specific o`mmendetionsregarding further_mitigation measures (i e.,.A _ _ • r: paleont ica monitoring)that may be appropriate.-Where mitigation - — monitori ,is rop ,appriate, the program must include, but not be limited to the f wig nw_ ngameasures-- - -- • Assi a pjeontologicalmonitor,,'trained and equipped to allow the rapi= m valof fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site • full-t daring-the interval;of,earth-disturbing activities. Y • Sh• fossils be found within an-area being cleared or graded,. dive= `-an.-.isturbm `activities elsewhere until the monitor has g — PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 11-64 DRC2011-00255 - JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 8 completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, • the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term • air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil- stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contactor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacture's specification. 3)- Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. _ 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. • 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour _ traffic. ,S &_.F - 79 _- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 11-64 DRC2011-00255 - JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 9 • 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. 8) Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan . (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. 2) Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer • - systems and other waters of the nation. 3) Perform inspections of all BMPs. . 4) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit • to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices • (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 5) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading - .- Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures.to.control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground • disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a)Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize - - - .- soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and - - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 11-64 DRC2011-00255 - JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 10 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality • Management Plan prepared by Lin Consulting, Inc. (July 11, 2011) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 9) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and • minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. 9 Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of • grading permits. 10) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan " (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural • measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 11) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall • obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under • the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects • between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 2) Replace the existing doors and windows of the adjacent single-family residence with retrofit doors and windows that have a minimum Sound Transmission Class(STC) rating of 32 or higher to be completed within 120 days of the approval of the project. 3) Construct an 8-foot high block wall along the property line adjacent to the single-family residence from the minimum street side setback to the southern end of the existing subterranean loading dock to be • completed within 60 days of the approval of the project. E & F - 81 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 11-64 DRC2011-00255 - JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 - Page 11 • 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official.- Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 6) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase to be completed within 60 days of the approval of the project. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. • The following mitigation measures shall then be required: • 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any . time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include • appropriate noise mitigation measures.To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Public Services 1) The project shall conform to all of the recommendations made in the Fire Protection Plan (Hughes Associates, Inc, October 2011) including limits on pile heights (20 feet maximum). 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011. • PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • E & F - 82 • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 11-64 DRC2011-00255 - JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 12 • BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • . • • • E & F - 83 • • z5t ;Y COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 44 DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00254 AND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT #: DRC2011-00255 SUBJECT: ALLSTATE PAPER AND METAL RECYCLING APPLICANT: JAMES LIN LOCATION: S/S WHITTRAM AVE - APN: 0229-192-09, 06, 04, 03 & 02. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • - Completion Date General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 11-64 and 11-65, _/_/_ Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans(full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/ /_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 2,094.00 B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, and Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits _/ /_ are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. SC-12-08 1 . ._...,.w...;..< ,. ., 1:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRc2011-00254-255 cond 12-14.doc - E & F - 84 Project NO.DRC2011-00254 and 00255 Completion Date • C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include /_/� site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / /_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. . All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for /_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. - 7. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided,all trash pick-up shall be for individual units.with _/ / • all receptacles shielded from public view. -- . 8. Trash receptacle(s)are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and _/_/. the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / /_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / /_ owner, homeowners'association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts / /_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2, All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / - contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, / /_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. 2 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRc2011-00254-255 cond 12-14.doc E & F - 85 • Project No.DRC2011-00254 and 00255 Completion Date E. Landscaping • 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in /_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree.for every three parking / /_ stalls. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: / /_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., DRC 2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. • 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal: • 3., Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to _/ /_ • the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. .„. _/_/ •G. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction, All plans shall be / /_ marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes,ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday /_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 3. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public /_/_ counter). H. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for the property line clearances _/ /_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. • 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRc2011-00254-255 cond 12-14.doc -• E & F - 86 • • Project No.DRC2D11-00254 and 06255 Completion Date I. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading _/_/ • Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. • 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / /_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Street Improvements .. 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails, paseos, landscaped. / /_ areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution#88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of / /_ energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for • which a permit is .required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been • completed and accepted by the City Council,except:That in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources priorto completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: _/ /_ Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail. Island Trail Other Whittram Avenue X , X X X X X n/a n/a n/a 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights /_/_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorneyguaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / /_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. 4 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRc2011-00254-255 cond 12-14.doc E & F - 87 • • Project No.DRC2011-00254 and 00255 Completion Date c. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing, street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. • d. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. e. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/ /_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in /_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed /_/_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction • legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be • per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. • Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Whittram Avenue Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 5' 30' OC 15 Gal Fill in Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. • 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector: Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. K. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting /_/_ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. L. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, /_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / /_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/ /_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. • 5 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRc2011-00254-255 cond 12-14.doc E & F - 88 Project No.DRC2011-00254 and 00255 Completion Date Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 daysprior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects: • M. General Requirements and Approvals • 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 3. Prior to approval of the final map, or prior to improvement agreement approval if no map is involved, all Tract Maps, Parcel Maps and public improvement plans shall be submitted to the Engineering Division on a compact disc (CD) in Auto CAD (computer aided design) format. If public improvement plans are completed after map approval, the CD shall be submitted prior to issuance of a construction permit for frontage improvements or a building permit, whichever occurs first. • 4. Provide copy of final Water Quality Management Plan with submittal of Grading plans to Building • and Safety. WQMP and Grading plans are subject to review by the Building Official. . • •• • • • • • • 6 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Sff Rpt\DRc2011-00254-255 cond 12-14.doc E & F - 89 RESOLUTION NO. 11-65 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00254 - A REQUEST TO OPERATE A 4.42 ACRE RECYCLING FACILITY WITHIN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT OF SUBAREA 15 ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WHITTRAM AVENUE BETWEEN PECAN AVENUE AND HICKORY AVENUE AT 13195, 13207, 13231, 13243, AND 13253 WHITTRAM AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0229-192-09, 06, 04, 03 & 02. • A. Recitals. 1. James Lin, for All State Recycling, has filed an application for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00254, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On December 14, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. . B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of.Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the • Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on December 14, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a request to operate a ferrous metal recycling facility; and b. The subject property is zoned Heavy Industrial; and c. The property to the north is zoned General Industrial and is developed with a vehicle storage facility;the property to the south is zoned Heavy.lndustrial and is undeveloped; and, the properties to the east and west are zoned Heavy Industrial and are respectively developed with a vehicle dismantler and a vehicle storage facility; and • d. Section 17.30.030 of the Development Code requires that scrap operations obtain a Conditional Use Permit. The Scrap Operation classification covers the storage and sale from the premises and/or dismantling of used recyclables; and e. The applicant proposes upgrading and expanding their existing ferrous metal • processing facility on Whittram Avenue. The facility has been operating at this location without the required Conditional Use Permit since 1987. The applicant operates a second recycling facility on Etiwanda Avenue that operates under a separate Conditional Use Permit; and • f. All State Recycling currently employees 42 employees between their Etiwanda Avenue and the Whittram Avenue facilities. The Whittram Avenue facility will have 6 full time employees. The facility will operate one shift from 7:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday and E & F - 90 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-65 • DRC2011-00254—JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING • December 14, 2011 Page 2 from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 pm. on Saturdays. They will receive approximately 10 to 15 truck trips per • day; and g. The project site is located within the Heavy Industrial Development District which permits open air storage of large mounds of raw and semi-refined products. The surrounding uses include vehicle storage, vehicle dismantling, vehicle repair and a non-conforming single-family residence. The major negative effect that the recycling facility will have on the surrounding land uses will be noise, especially for the neighboring single-family residence. As part of this approval, the applicant will construct 8-foot high masonry and metal walls between the project site and the neighboring uses, as well as provide upgraded windows and doors for the neighboring single-family residence. The proposed site improvements and mitigation measures should reduce the negative • effects on the neighboring property owners to an acceptable level. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or the • improvements in the vicinity; and • c. The application, which contemplates operation of the proposed use, complies with . • each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the • Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. • c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public E & F - 91 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-65 DRC2011-00254 —JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 3 • • Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, • Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is•the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and the conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department: 1) Approval is granted to operate a 4.42 acre recycling facility at 13195, 13207, 13231, 13243, and 13253 Whittram Avenue-APN:0229-192-09, • 06, 04, 03 & 02. 2) Changes in the operating hours (7:30. a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday , • through Friday and.from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 pm. on Saturdays), the _ • nature of the business(ferrous metal recycling facility)or overall size of • • the facility (4.42 acres) will require Planning Director approval. • 3) All the site improvements outlined in the Conditions of Approval for Development Review DRC2011-00255 shall be completed within the time period prescribed in that approval or revocation procedures will begin as prescribed by the Planning Director. The start date for completion of the improvements will be taken from the date of approval of this application by the Planning Commission. 4) The maximum height of all stored materials shall not exceed 8 feet within 100 feet of the curb face on Whittram Avenue and the maximum height of stored material shall not exceed 20 feet on any portion of the site. 5) Print a copy of this Resolution of Approval on the plans when they are submitted for Plan Check. 6) The facility shall be maintained at all times, including making necessary repairs as needed, and keeping the site free from trash and debris. In no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 7) The applicant shall obtain all the necessary permits from the Building and Safety Department. • 8) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Conditions, E & F - 92 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-65 DRC2011-00254 —JAMES LIN FOR ALL STATE RECYCLING December 14, 2011 Page 4 Health Department, Uniform Building Code, or any other City • Ordinances. 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary . I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and - . adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: - AYES: COMMISSIONERS:• • NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • E & F - 93 404.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 44, fp;,,_••„ s DEPARTMENT • STANDARD CONDITIONS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00254 AND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT#: DRC2011-00255 SUBJECT: ALL STATE PAPER AND METAL RECYCLING APPLICANT: JAMES LIN LOCATION: S/S WHITTRAM AVE - APN: 0229-192-09, 06, 04, 03 & 02. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. . APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: .- - • 0 General Requirements Completion Dare • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / /_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City,. its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 11-64 and 11-65, / /_ Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans(full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The / /_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration -$ 2,094.00 B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, and Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits _/ /_ • are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. SC-12-08 1 I:\PLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM12011 Res & Stf RptIDRc2011-00254-255 cond 12-14.doc E & F - 94 Project No.DRC2011-00254 and 00255 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/ /� site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program,and grading- on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. • 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. • 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / /_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/ /_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all / /_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the • time of building permit issuance. • • • • 7. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided:all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with / /_ all receptacles shielded from public view. .• • 8. Trash receptacle(s)are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and _/_/ • the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/ /_ owner, homeowners'association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. • 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall /_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, /- /_ . and exits shall be striped per City standards. • • • 2 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRc2011-00254-255 cond 12-14.doc E & F - 95 Project No.DRC2011-00254 and 00255 Completion Date E. Landscaping • 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in / /_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one.15-gallon tree for every three parking /_/_ stalls. F. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. /_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Director review and _/_/_ approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s)shall be provided for apartment, condominium,or town homes prior /_/_ to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G.:" General Requirements_- • 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: /_/_ • a. Site/Plot Plan; • b. Foundation Plan; c. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., DRC 2011-00254 and DRC2011-00255)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. /_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to /_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / /_ • • • • • • 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRc2011-00254-255 cond 12-14.doc E & F - 96 Project No.DRC2011-00254 and 00255 Completion Date H. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/ • marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2001-00001). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 3. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter). Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for the property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to /_/_ perform such work. • • 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the /_/ . 'time of application for grading plan check. • 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, - FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements(interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped / /_ areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. • • • 4 • • l:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRc2011-00254-255 cond 12-14.doc E & F - 97 Project No.DRC2011-00254 and 00255 Completion Date 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source _/_/_ of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any.and all other codes, regulations and • ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: _/_/_ Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Whittram Avenue X X X X X X n/a n/a n/a 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees,street lights, and intersection safety lights / /_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. • b. Prior to-any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. - - • c. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing, street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and -' • /_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction.of the City Engineer. d. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City / /_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. • e. Existing City roads 'requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / /_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required, A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in =/ /_ accordance with the City's street tree program. • • • • s I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRc2011-00254-255 cond 12-14.doc E & F - 98 • Project No.DRC2011-00254 and 00255 Completion Date 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed _/_/_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street • improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction • legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Whittram Avenue Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 5' 30' OC 15 Gal Fill in Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. • L. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or • issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. • Formation costs shall be borne by the • developer. • - M. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _/ /_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /_ • Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. • Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. • N. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / /_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 6 - • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRc2011-00254-255 cond 12-14.doc E & F - 99 Project No.DRC2011-00254 and 00255 Completion Date 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall /_/_ be paidfor the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from • landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 3. Prior to approval of the final map, or prior to improvement agreement approval if no map is involved, all Tract Maps, Parcel Maps and public improvement-plans shall be submitted to the Engineering Division on a compact disc (CD) in Auto CAD (computer aided design) format. If public improvement plans are completed after map approval, the CD shall be submitted prior to issuance of a construction permit for frontage improvements or a building permit, whichever occurs first. 4, Provide copy of final Water Quality Management Plan with submittal of Grading plans to Building and Safety. WQMP and Grading plans are subject to review by the Building Official. • • • • • 7 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Sff Rpt\DRc2011-00254-255 cond 12-14.doc E & F - 10 0 • NIL STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT I die. DATE: December 14, 2011 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18819 — WATER MILL HOMES — The proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: Development Review DRC2011-00629, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629 — WATER MILL HOMES — The design review of 16 homes associated with the development of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18819, the proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres of land into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18819, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. VARIANCE DRC2011-00383 — WATER MILL HOMES — A request to reduce the • minimum average lot size and the minimum lot dept requirement for 1 lot associated with the proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18819, Development Review DRC2011-00629, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2011-00638 — WATER MILL HOMES — A request to • remove 63 heritage trees in conjunction with a proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18819, Development Review DRC2011- 00629, and Variance DRC2011-00383. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 1.6 dwelling units per acre. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing single-family residential; Very Low Residential District South - Existing single-family residential; Very Low Residential District East - Existing single-family residential; Very Low Residential District and Etiwanda Intermediate School; School West - Existing single-family residential; Very Low Residential District • Item G, H, I, & J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18819, DRC2011-00629, DRC2011-00383, AND DRC2011-00638 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 2 • C. General Plan Designations: Project Site Very Low (0.1 to 2.0 du/ac) North - Very Low (0.1 to 2.0 du/ac) South - Very Low (0.1 to 2.0 du/ac) East - Very Low (0.1 to 2.0 du/ac) and School (0.1 to 0.2 FAR) West - Very Low (0.1 to 2.0 du/ac) D. Site Characteristics: The project site is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. There is an existing single-family house, the George and Jessie Johnston home, located in the southeast portion of the project site that is proposed to be relocated to Lot 17 located on the southeast corner within the proposed subdivision. Other buildings surround the home, including an office, garage, and several sheds. The project site has been utilized for agricultural purposes and vegetation consists of various mature trees and numerous grape vines. ANALYSIS: A. General: The application proposes the subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 single-family lots within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Lots within the proposed subdivision are placed in a north to south configuration, with 6 lots (Lots 1 thru 6) fronting onto Victoria Street, 10 lots (Lots 7 thru 16) fronting on to an east-west cul-de-sac, and 1 lot (Lot 17) oriented towards Etiwanda Avenue. The 17 lots within the proposed subdivision range in size from 20,181 to 29,099 square feet and average 22,003 square feet, • which is above the required minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, but below the required minimum average lot size of 25,000 square feet. The proposed subdivision is designed to meet current development standards, including lot width and depth, except for one lot which does not meet the minimum 100-foot lot depth requirement. The applicant submitted Variance DRC2011-00383 to address the minimum average lot size and lot depth deficiencies. The applicant submitted Development Review DRC2011-00629 for the proposed development of 16 single-family homes; the 17th lot will provide a location for the proposed relocation of the Johnston House. The proposed architectural design is a contemporary representation of Traditional, Spanish, and Bungalow styles, provided in both single-story and two-story elevations. Of the 16 lots, 7 are single-story 3,800-square foot homes, and 9 are two-story, 4,150-square foot homes. • B. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on August 17, 2011 at Etiwanda Intermediate School, which was attended by approximately 20 local residents. At that meeting, the applicant presented their project describing the site plan, architecture, Johnston House relocation, and the timing of development. The major issues raised by those in attendance included: 1) parking impacts to local streets, 2) the development and use of local equestrian trails, 3) impacts to property values, and 4) the timing of development. The applicant responded to those questions by stating that 1) the project is designed to exceed single-family development parking standards by providing 3 and 4 car garages, 2) the project is designed to meet local equestrian trail standards and that all lots will be equestrian accessible, 3) the applicant suggested a pricing scale that would not negatively impact local • G,H, I ,&J- 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18819, DRC2011-00629, DRC2011-00383, AND DRC2011-00638—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 • Page 3 property values, and 4) that the timing of development would depend on the local housing market. C. Trails Committee: The project was reviewed by the Trails Committee on August 10, 2011. The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the following: 1. The Committee recommended that the combo wall (combination block and decorative metal) alternative presented by the applicant was preferable to the standard solid block wall or PVC Trail fencing. (The Design Review Committee subsequently recommended revising the wall design to a solid 6-foot masonry wall.) 2. The applicant will adjust the trail intersections to meet the radius configuration of the Fire District Standard as a guide for horse maintenance associated vehicles. D. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on August 16, 2011. The Committee reviewed the project and requested that the applicant address the following issues: 1. The Committee reviewed the single-story elevations and did not recommend any design changes. 2. The Committee reviewed the two-story elevations and recommended the following • design modifications: a. Traditional — Expand the use of brick siding to enhance the entrance and additional portions of the front elevation. b. Bungalow— Incorporate the use of field stone on the front and side elevations. c. Spanish — Provide architectural elements at various windows to provide depth to the building plane, additional shadow accents, and elements traditionally utilized in Spanish architecture. Revise the garage door style for consistency with the architectural theme. 3. The Committee recommended the installation of 6-foot high solid masonry walls along the local equestrian trail. The applicant then revised the project based on Committee direction and submitted for additional review. On October 4, 2011 the Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project as presented. E. Grading Committee and Technical Review Committee: The project was reviewed by each Committee on August 16, 2011. The Committees recommended approval of the project as presented. F. Variance DRC2011-00383: The applicant submitted a Variance request as part of their • application to subdivide the project site because two specific development standards are not being met. Within the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, residential G,H, I ,&J- 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18819, DRC2011-00629, DRC2011-00383, AND DRC2011-00638—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 4 • development standards (ESP §12.2.1 (Table 10)) require each lot to meet the 20,000 square foot minimum lot size and 25,000 square foot minimum net average lot size. Here, each lot exceeds the minimum lot size, but averages 22,003 square feet. Additionally, each lot must meet the 90-foot minimum lot width and 200-foot minimum lot depth requirement. Here, all lots exceed those minimum development standards, with the exception of Lot 17, which proposes a 234-foot lot width and 96-foot lot depth. Facts For Findings: The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards. In order to grant a request for a Variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings. Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property. The following are facts to support the necessary findings: 1. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code. Facts: The subject property is an infill property bounded by public streets that separate the project site from neighboring residential equestrian properties. The applicant is proposing an average lot size of 22,003 square feet and all 17 lots are larger than the 20,000 minimum lot size; lots range in size from 20,181 square feet to 29,099 square feet. The proposed subdivision configuration achieves the principal goal of creating an equestrian subdivision • compatible with the •Etiwanda Specific Plan and the adjoining equestrian community, augments the equestrian trail system, and allows the applicant to address the preservation of a cultural resource. The applicant is proposing a reduction in the lot depth requirement from 200 feet to 96 feet for Lot 17, which will provide for the relocation of the Johnston House, a local Historic Point of Interest. Although the proposed lot depth reduction is a significant modification, the design far exceeds the lot width requirement resulting in a 22,501 square foot lot that is consistent with the design of the balance of the subdivision. The design of Lot 17 will also be consistent with that of an adjacent Historic Landmark, the Pearson House. Additionally, the application proposes the relocation of the Johnston House to Lot 17, maintaining its current solar orientation. This will also require matching the front and rear setbacks of the Johnston House to the Pearson House, which provides a 40-foot front yard setback (20 feet behind the front property line) and 25 feet from the rear property line. 2. Finding: That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Facts: The proposed project is an in-fill subdivision, bounded by a Historic Landmark, existing single-family residences, and local streets. The location of these existing improvements and the presence of the Johnston House, • establish exceptional conditions that limited the design options of the G,H, I ,&J- 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18819, DRC2011-00629, DRC2011-00383, AND DRC2011-00638 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 5 proposed subdivision, while also trying to meet development standard requirements. The proposed subdivision configuration will substantially meet the development standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, while also providing the opportunity for preservation of a local cultural resource. Additionally, the lot configuration for the proposed relocation of the Johnston House will be identical to those established by the existing and adjacent Pearson House. 3. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Facts: With the exception of the minimum average lot size and minimum lot depth requirement, the proposed subdivision was designed to meet all applicable development standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed subdivision provides for the development of homes that will be architecturally compatible with surrounding properties, in a home .size compatible with surrounding properties, and provide the potential for equestrian use consistent with surrounding properties. The applicant has designed the subdivision to provide the maximum average lot size achievable within the constraints of the property and a strict interpretation and enforcement of the minimum average lot size requirement would deprive the applicant of • privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the district. Additionally, the lot configuration for the proposed relocation of the Johnston House will be identical to those established by the existing and adjacent - Pearson House. 4. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Facts: The applicant has designed the subdivision to provide the maximum average lot size achievable within the constraints of the property and creates an equestrian community compatible with adjacent developments. The granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the district because the configuration of the proposed subdivision is compatible with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and achieves the goal of preserving buildings of potential historic significance. 5. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact/s: The granting of the variance will allow the proposed project to achieve the goals of relocating and preserving the Johnston House and creating an equestrian community compatible with the surrounding developments. The • granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity G,H, I ,&J.- 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18819, DRC2011-00629, DRC2011-00383, AND DRC2011-00638 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 6 • because the development of this in-fill parcel will not require an extension of City infrastructure/services and preserves a resource of potential historic significance. Additionally, the lot depth reduction and relocation of the Johnston House will be compatible with the development standards of the adjoining Pearson House. G. Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638: The applicant has submitted a request to remove 63 heritage trees in order to accommodate the development of the project site. An Arborist Report (Knapp Associates, June 6, 2011) was prepared to address a total of 70 trees on the project site and identified 64 trees that qualify as Heritage Trees (RCMC §19.08.030(8)) under the Tree Preservation Ordinance either because of their species, height, or size. The remaining 6 trees are fruit or nut bearing trees and are exempt from the provisions of the Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC §19.08.040(A)). Of those 64 possible Heritage Trees, the Arborist Report recommends removing 63 trees because of their poor condition and recommends preserving only 1 tree, the Deodar Cedar located in the southeast corner of the project site in front of the Johnston House. The applicant proposed the removal of all 63 trees because they conflict with proposed grading and development improvements. To address the proposed tree removal, the conditions of approval require that 1) Heritage trees that are removed shall be replaced on a three-to-one basis with a similar species of a minimum 15-gallon size, and 2) that tree planting, when feasible, shall follow the requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan regarding windrow replacement (ESP §5.41). H. Historic Point of Interest: The project site has been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the • standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). The project site contains the Johnston House, a locally designated Point of Interest, and also includes the former site of the Frost General Store. Due to the presence of these resources the applicant prepared a Cultural Resources Assessment (LSA Associates, September 2011), which evaluated the following: • Johnston House — The Johnston House is currently located in the southeastern portion of the proposed subdivision, within the limits of Lots 15 and 16 of the proposed subdivision. Existing buildings and improvements include the residence, 6 accessory buildings, various concrete features, and a vineyard. • • Frost General Store — The Frost General Store was previously located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street, within the limits of proposed Lot 6. The Cultural Resources Assessment evaluated the Johnston House for significance using both the California Register (4 criteria for designation) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (5 criteria for local designation). Based on this criteria analysis, the Cultural Resources Assessment determined that the property does not meet the criteria for listing.in the California Register or for local designation as a Historic Landmark primarily due to a lack of integrity. The report also concludes that the property does not meet the criteria for designation as a local Historic District or Conservation District. Therefore, it is not a historical resource as defined by CEQA. However, the Johnston House is already designated as a Point of Interest and, based on this evaluation it continues to merit that designation, as well as special • G,H, I ,&J- 6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18819, DRC2011-00629, DRC2011-00383, AND DRC2011-00638 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 • Page 7 consideration in local planning. The conclusion regarding the Johnston House was based on its current condition, not a rehabilitated condition, and is not an assessment of its monetary value, but its current value as a cultural resource. Although the Cultural Resources Assessment determined that the Johnston House does not meet the City of Rancho Cucamonga criteria for local designation as a Historic Landmark, Planning staff does not agree with this conclusion. Under the City of Rancho Cucamonga Criteria 1, the property is associated with events that made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local history, specifically, George F. Johnston's relationship to the local table grape industry. Therefore, it follows that the property has integrity and warrants designation. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will pursue designation as a local Historic Landmark. The applicant is proposing the relocation of the Johnston House and the adjacent office accessory building through the related application DRC2011-01121. These buildings will be relocated to Lot 17, which is situated at the southeast corner of the proposed subdivision, adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue. The Johnston House will be relocated maintaining its current solar orientation, modern additions will be demolished, and the house and office will be placed on a permanent foundation. Additionally, the applicant will be reroofing both structures and providing a finished lot and all utility connections. The City will acquire Lot 17 and the relocated Johnston House and will begin restoration and preservation, when funding is available, DRC2011-01121 will provide a Purchase and Sale Agreement, subject to City Council approval, for the City's acquisition of the Johnston House, office, and Lot 17. • The site of the former Frost General Store was also evaluated for significance. The Frost General Store was destroyed by fire in 1966 and the site has been utilized for agricultural purposes since that time. Although trace concrete rubble and metal fragments were observed on -site, no historic-period features, artifacts, or refuse were identified. No other archaeological resources were identified within the project boundaries. The Cultural Resources Assessment identifies that due to the presence and documented former presence of buildings dating to the late 19th and early 20th centuries within the project area, sensitivity for historic-period subsurface resources in the vicinity of the Johnston House and the former site of the Frost General Store is high and monitoring by a qualified archaeologist is recommended. If previously undocumented cultural resources are identified during earthmoving activities, the nature and significance of the find shall be assessed, construction excavation will be diverted if necessary, and a treatment plan formulated and implemented. I. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") • and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the • public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A G,H, I ,&J- 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18819, DRC2011-00629, DRC2011-00383, AND DRC2011-00638 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 8 Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18819, Development Review DRC2011-00629, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions with conditions. Respectfully submitted, J Ter, AC P Director JRT:TG/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Complete set of Plans Exhibit B - Design Review Committee Comments, August 16 and October 4, 2011 Exhibit C - Trails Advisory Committee Comments, August 10, 2011 • Exhibit D - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract SUBTT18819 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2011-00629 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2011-00383 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638 • G,H, I ,&J- 8 t v i i! fil x i i qR ; E? ;OP t Lf, 13*- 5 2 ini • ..- 1 1 ill : " I i I l'il i't r-i r 2' 1 I iii,TIL 5 ! i I Width 5 q, • a; „ 11 Et irT _L.., -a mi,b, . , it I - - , if v_vpait_4--- - b ei 4 „.: errEl 1 -Jai- ----a- L # '44E4-.....`,L' 'wilt l''''' - 0 • rrilw'aT4 '.1 1, -4'4; 1 t-C,N647,:- -:•••;E:74,`-vw,%4 -„ 1..t-1.._:". 4■1. ,'Awe!:„=„4-, gi ,:fri 1 ka, at „I j# - ,s7vo..-ittf , „pp-44 ,.-., r. ---- L07,wi,..- - ,-1 ,x.a..1„.-a-1-., . ”--- c•cr2..=-1-1 ..i. ,4-%&*? ':4,W,4:- ; XII-i-rx.i ..*1/4,k- -fr.. k • - ,',.^Limi..t.k ,st . .. ...,..„-4-1,9 .- „ : -., T;13:-.±:bz;;;t:Tht L--- i.:;,IK tt 1 ,...-_,...-4,_ `,,,,,.... trrah-- ..4f4..t.n -;-'4.1' ‘37.--_,---t ert „Th.g.tir' 'art ,'T -r•-• `,1 r:'.---, , ..... :tar.i."4-S trii,:tr":•rkaa#,,g", , L_..._.,1 _ e,,..-2 ,.- N., 2,;..1: 4, lb ,s ;4,i,;;;"' " . 7.-= :4?.4 r: :1414tritS '' - --j-7. ..7"----7-745LVL-.. -`0S5t% ii„tit- ;-,1,,r;n4.--.4.* ,11,441;,..- , cti-' ," , ,,Q:0-:-. -,, ,.2 -_,%„„,,t---P '- t.mc ,r ovina 4;-44 L il: ''44 "Ag/':',Lts 2,,, W'-' 6.1 A:rj''' '-'7" ,., 7"chlgrff,3144-'1.li-‘.,1-,,,le,,,,ct% ,-.44,,‘ 4,-,,,f, .y. ,A5,- 3 .,.,,,, t„),,--:-,, ,t,. -;-z, v.., ".4-%, r, cyt',0 0 tiefrv, .i4St.117,1",...,.-.4.44.4±,,_,:* ,2_,,,r_...c:,,,t4f4,4*, ,,,5,,,,,,,r ili,1/47---v,„„4 -, -,- I N, krbytt*4-:tAa4.:;ARW,L111-1,7" ..1-- ii77*Z2.47Nrkt-, - , ,,:i 7: i 7:04k. :, -75-1175, ttar144 ' '4,..ritilt5tr,ttrz-r:-..M;);,,i-,,),,i-...- =3:1--,_WEcTiff:Atot,„-fi; ' b --,' , lerv#:,1.,r,wat:-yiatz,4.-i *Nyz, ,-,:e„,g -,..:.„-_,,..,.. „„ .4h.,-.7-:-Cki 1`1/4t1 2. atit-tr .cri.n.witer;rtkr.--'t,,..'"It..:, .11"rifctg,;#7-- tc::2 ;I.4.f ,,-;iI4„, ,i1.1 .,. ,..i-„*„.rd.!;-,-.- ',1;;;;;,:ar,11.1Y,.\;--, --*7 tuvk 9-4.' +A ' 'i ..:4 1414-- '1/22-;:v< vtitia F ,,,---. .., 1,i., ;;;„,„4,. nu-,..-;,..-.--IPA.,-,,44,914-c.,1. eir.n.,11.1n,;;*.,,-, - • _.1 ,.,,,vt., r...m. ; ;,-..„ . -...,,,..„ -'t;'4' 11 VC;;11-;:ellAlital: P.61:1-V,,,,,f11;netaigiV4thl'4/ ; tl1/20. i• -`■N:' A .10)17,Wel401117/fS;01/2;111'i ' 't ..- ■7.-17:543", Itt a) ritA4*;4., 4P141-5.3.-"'7,ct 7:itrikl,7:15;Fit:40:i4nPirit":1St cr:',20i '\''' •1:'-AZ. 1 '' ''1"kna- ac.'Ci:,r, f 4 r t: .0"14,- 44:141,t -r'7 =A1/414'114).21:tf7A:41-,:isp- ; .. *"1.e-, ini trii7v trip iiiirit' - ,,Itti7,-,Al yh4*ea,vgg;----f--i;- -fffz-r-4-gtakY-L-t;j1,FtrTPAwl, s•c45,5*4 re 7S-1 i c.i: e 0 Li.''' 1 • 0 t:60 g iivratv3,:n...t . itE.fcr,,,,blir"3/4;!.Eri„itiy,:iscLsr_ , 444. IC' /cot" i z „wt. - 1 IP.317.-nr4p,,r,,m, I, -,.26 I ‘t —4 v.a'tp,4,i■ ,t tcww-t-tt-a.4,4ailryi,t474.-+',"7-4e...VFW), ,.1,,,P,:,"a;,,-.17,-?--,,, O.- tinn•pl.', a7t#6:-.-+--LancrihRripi: r.111417Cialaer.%70.4 11',61Z-bri'3411rAlaltH*SLASVII.15:9 :Cat lir ar4Apl I k 1 r n:e._airetegtiWikt -1',2,4,r'+"‘..-Ti„-,71 pi• le,vr-rfitrrej'me-%r-: EA-41-thscr=r-?-rstiliF .r..T.4-3 , ,ilky;Petc-A1P2;t;i:' 1 i V -1- ys="1.il?..." r i° _ 7/ -4-''- -'-',n-,K-A•trl-- i nt" "Iv'Ir.A.-4-4,,,344,-Ft t#1 y.I tZ.'d•16.1/46t,"1,41 .7=ttr."74-1--'7''trait,'we it,4Th re --rirL--,_ A lit-1,-,,. ,pa, - EL- , ' d r., r %.nrarrrni==.47' -r.c.-23-4-trzLia.„41- . T 1 -- ',VII. P'' LP''---1 -t1 Ilts-i41,- ';-.1""'"7,-•c-',1-Ztat?-2 d.1°44.7414: ,-,bittb-_-.----- --,..-- 77.:.,,,,4tt, fft,---- --t-- ---alta, ,1-,--,..„.,,z1/4.-9-%-:-.„9-kair, —.Jr, --1/4-4, -.aillie :;_.,77, it:, - - -.h.. Iv..47-7; .vz-an---4 ' -,r.• .....,,e1/4v,e- ,z„t., -ji 4n- ,t,t4,1/41,,on4t,„." .,_—_-=---1/4_,..1/24,,,,„ .. .-cr;,,, 0:em 4P-',.:„:":54, 49--:.- ft.-.7.--_,to -4-N, , 4g,-.1---x0.,3„ -..,...„ ,- --;Th- tiorte, cr , 1,1-"VS:- ..----)Htfi.It lje.riE•---- 11 _7i 3 ‘,..., . a. !wry_ ..... 0 EXHIBIT A 9 Gill I ,8j- i e i ri Ly Elti 09 a= F 1B1 • Z` >I I, t-aH. ".a.'�ik. ti.urate' �, q,�.,f " n- Iq`nk,` .MC'm-' n1t J^ 1 s' nK �L*, "Sy q. k _ r r jf' s. ,si" Y. `"" i'S''� f a it�. 1 t �q x A=4The* ' .-, ''C. = i ''^.rmad-77 R Y _y 3j' I T F! "y-"/z A .➢.J'_z S! "e r.� 1 b r t°nc11 _14 iy, ' 1 --`- -tea ..r .-t f �N § #tys� 2r1Y H ✓., ".. adtra "ate, 1 E�i s t d C 1 �llar--r'a --- 'J #iiiç, y rx w '" ,q., n die A ,- vf, iyf-1e “'�a! 1,W r ,, k .r. ti g u^' ' , M rq 'k..I . , . i'Wd r'S` _ x fix.^C+11,"w�" ar T' „qy� "7" ''�' y 1 m s N 9„e1 '. 'a” e��r,Y&[9'��'. 5 e S#1 bit `l ug a 1± #� fit.,°, 7 gyp, Sup ."..- ��G ` t ' wri ^. fur - '1 ,-��lI I2E 'YE ! d\ '� CL Z ; tut u - v :d+ cC+"^v+r+ .m. 11 ,it . 6 of "- �d f,_ t `*k.: i'_,t„ � C%5 s.+ "'S 7 ' a`>�y� - ' fis.n m0`ry s�,a rifl any' . 4 c__ •E LL I p u �I�t d m nW v . N7d- w axa RIP @ ex tt € p q4 n ~ ---",it W a-.,.s I;pO � l&Ir 4C:A. gr d ' - i x1,7u375i + •T4 7.1 .' CO S '.4,-4----- -'''.,1”g ce-••,+c'4"ar "'v Puxp• R l,;`,,l' . -.At:-a"i � K.. a `d'. °�1�. d' ,4'QM"5 ' i'�" ". ak'. s t R'w,. V'-° ! T#d 4t 3 - �ry,i J � 2 �.-=�`i�'�,- 0�y�i5n� �>'"�k°'�,'°+aS �` u d k' f h'�'� n.�p to e�.„i t . 47'04 #� i' ti_-$ L. ,,,I����y,,,4`���`��`�u` xµi �7 g r t i ..y & °` .� I m ' " fir+"d 3 dd! 85M?°14, ylli ' " P " : �' i131 .r s1 00 � . a "�* c� � AL -anv �f4 c rt3H "'c 'd �.e'Ij i -4- It 4 ; �—)T,,,...;;i r k- Ati 4 �,IIY_ as ¢ ,-- 4' w III 2' �iwu E iz'' '� s� itt .v"t'k rta ,+'' wtk -q `: �: a�pj�'� .,i�bv §! tra ,. a µ a E rw T. iv,u j : ._ k L. ,t�m» 1 et"�. fir i �WNd.`d` a a x� �1�x5•k 'S" ♦ lt'�3`(1'+ .' ..' pt....._ '1>1y k ad y�� �r � �� p+� 'S' �f pub.-• .t �`r d;. �I Ili.d"°°qi � , �! r n ae � �k� 7`^r+a .�'.:.�!:-- v� �^ '� i�,a h=kY �.t .y P tc ,..1 r� ,x.'34 4^N "a" C -.'_'"/" b --Z— • G,H, I ,&J— 10 u p F a • Is aZ� q 1I ft' ti SO 2. U a0 I 1 _ __ WMY YOM'MI13 ___ _ 1 e I .g i =f R / ' f A ! k <k t 1 ,, e 4 E 1 • F- ; n - _I A-------- d L 1;:ast weal i= Ez p = t 1g1 1 ; 1III I I I E !1 e ° e 1 I I I• J !jkfti 6 iQ6I 1• I i 1 i Ii 1 @• i I I .e li @ a 1 ° 41 @ e I i I lii I 9 B i D' iii eeiI • h =Atli € i1 €q 1iill qyI ; =• e • �� € 'I Ii {p[ I .j6 I it 111 v1 I 1 l i i 1. 111E einliR;tiiIth I 9195' II 65: Ie ea ,I III II II I0IIleIil ' S° 6 B°p 36 ri 1 I; ;1 ; .31611 I 'e .: - ;, e: ° I ;F 1 [ ! ° @@ :IlMiQ „ II Ho € l; . 1� .� ! aI .II. 'gl 1 ,1 I:; , E P; Id t I ;! I a0€ g °i Ilii' Eo I�BI {s€I t i's it. i''1I; U 1, G,H, I ,&J— 11 a a4. a Tae e ; 4 ill! 18 A i - SI. 1 2 IF i i per b x i , • I, ; IL g g0 5 Eli i 1 g g b i q .v. I 1 1 i . '-' 1:iii 11 I 1 si 11; t 1 dlil frill 41 ' vi! .1.i 4 Eit / 'di • a ilL i 11 - ET I 1 1 N gil ii : is 01! -1 ! 0 1- ;14 i fi 14 I i 1 II siIIII lel [ lar 1 q 1; 1! ; il NI 11 ,.Ic I 1 IIII1B 5 I e e —.— di aell st1 b : S _.. .._ --m—Z--■ Kt 1 i' 13 1 a I 113 . t. — - r ' . , I I' 31116411 YONI7V7L3 . 7., ' - , ..;_r__T--- 72 = -----77--__ ,.._,E..,__, . . , ! 411—r4`.=47 _ ____ -: 7-----IE mi1 II .---,m___: 1 r '• r. • 1.4 r 1 J-. i.?.. ' 1 1 - IC, L.I l i_r ! ir:__I,f 21:1 41 1 H 'r--1 I I. 1 4 4 1) I .7 )1' tr.>, '- ,., Ili•:--- .;:':*''''I — , ' E k• A,1 ..-1--Ha I__ , , .- ..-,-,Ki-o,,,,,,,;,,,,,,k.ct.,;:li 1 t - e, III .m"--7 , -' , . um ± , , icir , . v.._ --... ii il 114,I ,-- - --------- - cc ' ±_ii ,,/,,::::T ",k hi_ it-7,--pvi' I Wilinfak ' Ili E l INEEEEtt:111indllrai i, 1 1 • - 1r ' 1 I Y sc. , k. --.. — ltarl ki•a: ! '.. .-,11 1 '-', Z a_ , • ! I I ■ aa-- I e 'e ° \ :i: • ' i'l '------ la. ig 1, 1. I .,'" "114. 7 ,IMIN I . . ._ 1 ;:art Mi. 1,.._',41 1 1 I ... 1'; a 1:-'. ll I ! I 1 \ :I i 9 •_.HI r . - ;: , 111 I 1 f, III \ 1 d I• ,, 1 ,th .-- -' ll 0 II g, ,,,,i , i: imir, _ „.. . .. julermiz-- H I --...:7.--"".`7.5----- --1,;, , 1 ,6 I" - I HH ' 1 kf c iVa.\ ! 41 41 r? 1 ---i'- AI 1 ---N----h\--1 II;\ : 1 i! ' 1 . " r, „ ' .... spin,-,j al,lit• i r;N! .9 „ . ,III Ill: 1 I ' at '. — 11 i "1.‘,., : • ”Pl 1 '1 I p riiiiii x in • -`-4.------Hi ' .1 - '''' lit, ',.__ ' - 1 :,,,,:,,. 1 [ ii< trill ri 0 • • __________t iil mei ---rrt: •— in A . t . IV' , , immeamil ..,, - st______ .._ nt111111 L . at 'a•ai l Li • . . ., I . — i --1, 1 , 1,, . Ati, 1 k . I VII" E :1 li ''''“- ■ 1 iCt.---7-----1 ,a I . 1 ' TE 1 -:: II 1 _ ... a ':', ' tj'fi 1 nummallir PI I ii 7i:.', Thl Me 1,. illni , •• E,,, .. .....:_ a ' i I T - . 1 ,1 7a: -11 I 1 arab: T:i. • li , :1+. ! ...,, .,...i. H 1 , . , , • c__i 5., . , . i . -," i , 1 • ' I j •-=' • ; 41 .q.,/ 441, • .,---. I :" I ' ' li t t r t a. .: 1, t -a 117' Ida ih: : I l ia;* eei; .n1 le (mai ono 1 ___, 1 _ — '- -SE _' „, , „:,- , , , . ! 5 . ni iii: 1 1,1 r----- - 11 1 ke.:.. if.;:-..”.•-•,,„,.. , i, (II • . , , ,a 1 1 1' I j Ip ilrell -7? FIF.111E3FICICE33:11 41 , Ur I • . - r 7 1 I I I 4 y 44 ! 1 ! i4IMMIIRHHHH1 ! t 1 4!SJ h G,H, I ,&J- 12 1 NV1d advOSONYI S9WOHDNINNVW I� - I i ABYNIw13ad ' VIUNDdI'IYJ Y'JNOWYJfl3OHDNV 61881 JJViLL • •.''k7H4 -,rint., I�C� ...,. �s �p l�®i n} VQWIXIIS.H "1`'/ °vaw �Yw/11 umv ®NW J e 9 "s 9q Ka 6d 1 a E a nnanvvavrmua { C 3(.,enn ,..,. ' I aA t w4a' / li. z aagcaa III .iii746 E� '� ,A �� Ix'� ' d s ar '". / r aaaaaa6 e 11,�� ! @3 r e s I A4 r s °'e s] ®;. mw` \ 31 i=^TM' I w 0:* ,'C st..Mkt n}. ; ILSoaf. I°. y.r it s w k pv c I [ � Y' �krl 1�'1" � �'I�t e'�' �Y�A“,",-..-,q f Kkn �r��y 3 d �� IA .. R f ,4. (� MEI ..- . .;:i",, vi;rt,:tit ,v,vli,6ki,ttaar -.±, rziMbil. isittoicPW--,gi'it4:41: mil 0 a +- WP.a.Y'd�u>3 'J ¢ F-€-»" ^.z..F , i� s� it' '1z���'; N .� tlmr�• a ,b d1. ..�\ - -i. wA 4 .s,- P1it:, 1 , \ y i '-° r g S�S 1'-+�� r I £' S4� it,�e="'ti914' \ /l .,f R?` '"w" � �: a�a'.aa ., r.F ^ ® -t @Q ax wA k9 arralosHltx / as a� ,� tie r id rB mom %r a _, ' is 9 pg� r 8 t aaaa rise \ / /�es.� `L t 1 C I S...•'- 2 l g-',fir• 1q51 5 ,/el' 9p 'ak 11 ai . a i-tit i`Nsie @A' K�'3 9$�- Eire Aar I R,,�j`019. -y !+"- j ✓y ?{ IS. jat Las i`$i Yt a ;VP s9.,>ti a V, ',. I t: _.ac y ,$:Thi �it).g_e dry.4i.(,�,g.:,,,j a +y<�r �/ thmA„,a`..'_,A;e*;.Cltlne^^l7 ,Yyq 11UI 1 s, a aaita$`k�1 oio i�F. .4 sN"1 1I JkS t,em om4 ;.r I L m1 ltd, 4 _ tcswmm°e� J `�pry 9 t: 3 Nalml mwar. m ,dr i I� : " s � k g'r Q If p�pP ) War� : A ! �NS°[P 1Sd l7"..� 3+v b .al f iY1yr Y�('f 1 4,y \.l J S \1G.4. csaasa'ttk5;O ` s$ i° .y,e.,, �'an'efiid g lee �ea��. �,' His Nri it 1 E' A Fd4 tA,"ri'fi y N1Sfa` �- >a y� Tel p d a y } Efy'. �1'� . 1'FsS+'i'a .,IP�11p ',a'h 9 a q��ltl l ,,S, 15g P"[r 41 Ilo i a R1 .,ln� I F i NN t UV I a N� � `M.. a ((pp ?��?�yy��� �, k� Ybbbbb�����g,,,,, la I a.1( a 5 1Gi 64§, "- �i , fr` ®IW 4 1-3.. 4.. S ,g l :4F:.. ”Y1! r'r �'��T, w 1 ¢ r r � - �Irl .'~'�' � :f�a�rre� tarp PT: �t IY �. !➢ a i3 �Fi ^Y, 40w' 1� cif °s,dk "' rnpi n1'i. w �f '! v 3 1 illill � Y x>" rti a .>t 7q} S N;Ina7�, Y.� ` k .fr `L-`` Y3. fi.J S'''^LA oia- ..K.ep .:u'` .+ , t I 1! f ; W i1Vgradi !Imria`"- s r�"'iS, aw- T 1 ,. k '!rc, \ - 4.al wi wl5 V MLvd...,, JP.SCIa0.<.:.CSw,4-.4.3 YY4.LLICd'e_d.5SL91..h04" k�. ,,a,Yu^.'4 ,1,7 Y tL,,, I I _ BJrid LlYllO \ 1 ; 3 i 0 ' d 3 G,H, I ,&J- 13 NCld 3dTDS0NCi 'Pli3tld S31c OPONINNVN '� k SONWLJ aNC MIa<Od�av':Ilxow]on laovea d�exlnt'al if ! ' r,mvx � :y ----.7—.....-\...®; _ 35(IOH 1C01tl O151N Lt 101 dd)�lx11.i.$ ,� exrxl n I „„ " } I 1 • ar s f r I .�w� y 'c11 -A i1 1 ',1 x]111, J I � � t r; Zy $ a€ _ ,S+b. ha a ,r cam' C ' 1 'I.. 4.:: g yb i ,I {:i. -_..v v..�!- "'y 4 < Its _ S € fig! 68 IM 1 ]U k G wY._Q :.r FI n. I `n`•�n.n��l' S h E ���Y ILl 1 y- 4 ;I -2`�fK w,i<I 'a., 1 br'{ sC 1 a< l.c ,"�`- 3.A /,.• f eim°s rt '+E `v.,...„P°a air' �,;1 F viii til 2 15 ,'.pix"4 ¢ 9YT °y y ' I�*e __,:,„,:..4.,.._. f it J vA -d '.I i pp �,( iy. r 4'': l °aTYE S o' i4p 5 /a.. y t ssa �n • d v ,9 I J ■ a * `T`- .asro` a.:47;':i-.:.i f iY 5. ,- � �. yy,,,, 11 idl lr r.`d'y . Jt i Ir t• a+[ y 1 z Tay�� i/ /� tnu , 71)-- •ya � t<� _- S* v3 d4 s..1' i ./s `y�Z2,2.`I i t re r� ' rsP `�- sJ" �3 3?� k i • 5 / c IktVx•' ^� 1 1 Y � / M � � max , j �� �> II 6 � �Y t �I.r` 'F'''''' Y.i`® 'J ., ` / .y . �91 • rz u I { SE 1 Y4 r �rt9r.!'k '3 E ! :-:--t-a !l/r .y� r f d10 7n � {„ r" 11 CJ� S 1 .Nam ° ig laP rfi ,'�T.,t„IZ � �4 X 3 $ <: "ak ab'y+ I Mitt-SIX rye Yia � I ,ya�111 M1E a` I S it !'s> -: f aq ,, ` :5 I .F A w - 4 Y np ] LI l� i 4,„.„,5 ;�,- n`g • I I 1. NO ■ G,H, I ,&J- 14 133H6 31111 ,.,,..�:.,. w,,.S3WOH'�NINNtlW tuna nc¢�m I .....w.«.� ;�ml �..��...._ ..r__, uu ®. VIMNOdIIVJ'YONOwVJroOHSNyN fIxaIlOVw. ..me•'l w� 4A _ OM.4.01. i j a VQNVMIZ3 „i DOI run J a • e1 kJ L L Z > I/1 IIIIN \\w\\� o • I■4 N aN T 1iy P n o LT-1.1 N L-1 P U ¢ N ` ` h W U u ^ U n g Cl) RI 01 ¢ a°e i ? o W Q m J �1 C x < ,--i O u c g a < ll O 2i 3 w z . 3 � rc F�1 W Q 0 ..1 U � < o I- Z Z , m N' i G V/ y y n x r h < Z F t P i < o 3 ri U aE * � 0 w a S Z x H II 0 ga I I @ • N 1 1 i li i Y g §s e im e €q a §ail z . , 8 99 20 is E@ z agIgl s BBG : , o 5 QQ¢ !I 1 _ 4 Z 333 z �. S s �_/,- 0 il. � e � e g 1' as ' iY °W L i I 2"::' 6 ill 111 hi gg i� 6p WO a !o ip s i - 1 • - w • 4 • =V G,H, I ,&J- 15 CNYId 3dVOSONVl I d..�:«. ••,•28-,........o.622 S9WOHJNINNVW ,,i, �� ..;..-.--- � R. •'_ �m_®•�'y�i N ASVNIWll3Ud VI8NOd1lVJ'VON0121V311JOH3NVll 618211-WI1 yn'n m ` �� VCCNIV/ALTa AI. ...,- •J e 3(IN3AV VONVMl12 i{ j $ Ij��j,� 4 6 � ';+Jr,... (11 J e i•ii, ��7�J•e4.g �.© Lid a.•1410 YFs6 �"� CC'/ VIII Ta 3c:In 1 • I 1 I u. , El 0 11 NI •1 ®'iE��d®i 1 F may®® 11 pi I�j ®®pBIBRIE fI , I ) S 1 I I v a La i , , � M Z ,>wg . , R, [ .# yg� I ,,P1. �I ' f SK af�v 24e ° i . 1 fir , . r w' 1 , �w�®ifl -I�N• ��i '+' ^ I',. �� 11..q 1111111EUMENOF 4-41fri ark yid i'' 'M1' �� nnevisiant I L. i ®I 1S 1I, 1/4, €_ ¢g --'�my op M1 s a I. E6 ale k e i ° lei C �y�yyp�, y. : j €S 1 II 'Iy� QN 66:' .: g i# �N 1/� a /4'� �I�i I .Ri I;!1, ..I AN �� ,1 Y'ir I 1, IIF ��/ -' 1 1 L Y aN • +.nre.`°r a III! j `/���` i�' It;Z4 1. # p ••pG -lf-"e• v x 1_� 1i1 r��50.r w n.Iy- ii 8 e• le ',W ',41417,, 01 El g o iP4�®� I 1 1�8��6ig v z ' ° ' 1 g 13 '�� a `I KW F IG �t, , n. y..,; - `'_'_ -- i;+�ty MO— .L 2 PE �, � �. ` — —Am ! 1� •` 424' pii II 7 I 5 5,� Pig mhn - )III � 134 Cu i 4� / rr °o _. yam i (I' ` i� S o 1 1 I re!_ _ 4$ 4gg) ttf- fz,_1P 111 yr�ryry ' mO Il - (I £• 61 '� 1 ° 'lie .' * C F �,I 1 w € u \ + ) f N 1� \/9 1 Ll a Oh qq y��p : 1�� ' Q°r. a �� `O � f - Affe,�Ii� W I 4®�.3Sti6i�.B� �9 ���t�iaasu�e��o.s>mew '�.Rw�6�itCm' ^�:.—�'Tim—"u.• WIC �.f o._--S aDVid 3dnio i--- - 16 _m ___ _._. __i —... �� „..: , InCe NYld 3dYJSONV1 S3WOHONINNVW ANYNIWI13Hd VIHNOdIIVJ'VONOWHJ00 OHONYN 6I [JJfl1 C II��� .wAr NQNv as , „ = l ®, > J c • � E ' 3D 3Atl tlONtlMLI3 s:i U 7 ! x dd fl •Y> i J Jl W 'l ._ '. , o 41 W 'e . < eG 8z 3 p o C j; i AU ed . , 3 €I 6s Gui — : ..i.-:8 F< i5' L I •". �`k'-,`,*WV —l.., ..N.1.):-::,y. ,..,, r _. •":°r. S 7, I, 7-1 III 9 f tid)0 _ 4- m�., ——I— ;• g � �. 9 °,v I�kx I¢ �fi�, 1 I r III } I � a I I` s e i I ®1m�}°® ill �NIG 3 I: S 44:i. F g, III -I� grA E.5 f q hF• , ., t�IS A; EI7 �� l �iN�®sue I�� 1 ii/d pi 1 . Q CS.S II $11 e "4 ■a ! 'GA , r. II e El M Rs P ® E a p I� ;: �y !Jill .1 N b ((II®i®®�® r W B dN 9 b 11, A I 3 m i 11 4,1 k 1 MR pm. inns (emir t —'— I Oft F 4,..0.2s 0, ^4 ]I r d •3 N� Chi „( �. �C W Imo II iiiiiiiiii : 111,1111111 ,i fittarre ig - , , : it cd IiIiIIIi!I� 'ice ® ® NII_ t ! r`., _ 1§" �' iE , Etc 1 11111111ii�, 1111111111_ _ ! wr Ei ee , � �� ;,' !e } 1.0! - j l g s I Iii p 're pi, v x F q E ilei >?Z�L1. 0408 e �e 9bi� x le P }`I !!else 13 isI I!/ I, 7'" ? _. . i ! ` t; k i $pe4islr!$ €I I S Arai a• o •9p 9!I'e'le,e1d ,,!!!!!!!!L J ! T 14® 3Jtl1d 3dM,O _ - 17 »--��.—�. �3� . ! -.j v_. � _ w� ' . � .( . , ,,, . .. . ; r,i 0 0 . I. , �` . . ; | }) :Ici r, - - - / sag ) 5 a5 z gl -LapeE- \= l \ k y ( . § . , / e § / \ : ' ) 5 { } � \ ® a 4 ` $ • �° e ƒ � q -mug • ! : !(�k \- _ LE.2 ,,,, • ... N:. . . ! , ) ; _ ! ! d ' - . ! / . • ) Lpigc Pq \ _ j ( k } = _� � l N �tl JNI1N�ltl � � uxiu.°�"¢ S3WOHONINNtlW .w+ ':.'t. �I €f Tr teo / a CO YA 191014d 7Y3IdAl V N0j1'YJ'YJN(WtlaflJ OHJNV lltltll lJtlllt 7:= p� - 10 VQNv La .. J e E 111111 14 iaa iiii1 iie i itti iii 1st igi tii i1i iit 1111 1111 t 3f , • i i t221 ! : iii 99999 gang 1911 999 8itl . :8e k i 98< Mt my t ., 1 1 99 `` 12•• / 3PASaF ••i hh9 idd... . . 9➢ .,, i! t it i .99 1t" III ,tiia Iliti iiti 'ii iii ii!iii iii P iiii iiii f ,i i;° ,i -t a ; in 8 iiiin ffi ," 1 E I itFi f1(((1 ,IittiI g, ii it, 9p $ i 9g Fp s [{ ¢g b ft t ti i �� pp i9i I, 11 ipp i 9i q9 3P , g vi `( i9 I Ri # ti op e° 3# t tits={ R idol 5 pii $ C ! ] ei tit , q{{ {y I qi ppegt� i e @p a[ f F10 19 i 1199113 lull, is ! { iE i3 p y €Y MI ] ].2 € !� P � �• {9 � � ai] 16 {i p°�e C �i Ili i ;ii iiili lit ii iii i 6 iii Pit 1 id WI 1E i1 1i t 95•i i•i i '1t a i i ei31 ��ait 3 i � � in �d$ 1].�i HI� ] !9 i ti {�� 6 E:oit p+� ,iy 1 t 5 i5 i qgI if {t ;4IIII p E!ii➢ih e t$ g i e t i �SC 4 t,•i !it i Ig4pE• !` h 61 p1 i! 1. E @i }3 olg iti, iA€ 4p4p s3} ; E4' -$1' p1Y'p j iJ L I] sii 9 1'E i g �M i i iii �39 . pi ..i:I;€ i6 1 i 4 ${{ n ;p p3E ii n i°}aa'pp 1$9 . Q k i¢QPg. p ii., iISEiM9 t 991 E t @9 E€i - Ili ti�6 i �@3@ i t i E€64@ � 4� 1 -� 7131 @ �3 e 0 0 0 ® 000000 O III ill 3 li Eli 3 't _.....— AOO . O '00 00040-6-e a eppYi�000. op oo 0 111 a "4111 411 E. _-...Q10/3E ni o°°0° ° O °oo°o° 0� 'i@ i la: €ati eery.0'Vy� aapO °o0, °O 0 i { i:!!) 5 9 b� o u o°o°p?o4:p?o°000°$p°o 00 :❖:. L 999 ISO lair •° CD p eV i40):6 v i C. pOpa V/ / oa14e , :: a ∎€ E£ CD RUN CD . 0a .to:. �/ a CD 'gi�,og I r CD CD i 601 4 111111 5109;::::::: , . ilg>I lobo Aces :s 44 t ES B®7�(I�� C� 3i 3 egoism. J ��� ® ' CD iii, Ii i • • 111. . _. .. o•�••••• ' o a h•. 6 ¢ oo dill a s 0 �''o� �.ode°°'p'ou':.;';� 00®�� O °o p`. o_oA,O e000p00 p_n s!90 oop , o wv.,; C ¢ 0 000 °o•ieo,°,e;.p; r', ,00-00 0°°° o�oo°°p°�:S tut O�IO�o Os J;••" % °OL i••� ��i� F 999 °421„,::::,.e ,, . :.. > — CD CDED C9 It YFip::� •N` tie _.� (/- I- � a::.:; . !a9 r . ii_i f ° �r,p CD' /1 E- gon g CD poi! , sgi ilJ ^ .I, i� F °, 33 b o.. •`. a06d�' i • 6 *,00 1 is pq °•*(4 C�'ED CD a ®...;.•. . �� 111.i ,i •ipo°ao .tt t4t; ::: ° O p O°i°o CD O( MOO .... 1 G,H, I ,&J- 19 O �Yld 3dYOSONYI 'Wll3tld ...,,... ,S3WO�HONINNVW .,�. o s :�� Y m;"„:w ��� saunouo OuY r�anojnrJ rora��o o i�a a,xxi Ural x,;�). :,,,,,,,.Yt Y `°°t 0 J 3Sn0N IYOINOISIN 6 101 +9- a^ •"'° 4, III , I— , • ,__9. . / \* IF „ lr /. . . I� . •r:_ �1• a E W ii n. 1 kraj 111111_1111..1!1111 0.;.,_ Jill id, • ofct..kkie%co di 1 44 allitis-Tiartairi-ti (4,---":_ itztsti:- ,., ra„.........._:_t. .., , ii„:00.„ , mir 1 . If s g AlIFEw / 1 t/g a Ai_ 1.- 't°Slop I 01 �lg /// I W ss iii 0: wor, sg - s V ill swag I. ., !' ® x .� . z�e 4 E . j tl A 1 ' " I 1111, 4 ° - ! 74.07 Os re 5 i *, grit . • 2g / I / :3 °; •k G,H, 1 ,&J- 20 f/ = = t. • , 1� _ _ - w . 1 1 Z I< ..4=itt BeB - ° td L, `Qc'dlai rzeprir -air Yl V 1 f� 'grC.) < c— U mrSt -'11110) ." =I ;," W F a t nI x i s - ts Ems \ w o .];aa�� 7-I .`\1. I 'h kai \ III I-J , '' ICS 3C° 1 tram rip_ I _ < eeiP _z-' p p p .0.61- u3 �^ r. m !� I 1ri 1111 u1 r�Ai h1111 r w ,i 1 ila i 7 g r Li ,• z �j��-p F r 0111 = Q p a s 1 7 111 x1111-��7!!P11 ?" o 'W,.� ,�� 1111 i 111LiL111!L'LL �+ +r �g (1 E R1 1 lb (Mid "La 11421:11 1114141141 b5. 7:°1 L ii!�I iE i�ij�°[1t -I! Tl l' 8 b ! i is P�E 7-iS 'i '� �dill(+ i a > Er�;.1�.1 lil��'`1 ��i 1i1i4' ` 'I� , m ' ti�l L-1 �(i�E'�,. III 1J�6� o t ,�� 0 bt i , Z �� Ip 11 i,�IIIII r Z l��1I! G,H, I ,&J- 21 •_-'S 5' : 3t • ,, • , . . , t , . �o .. y,,I 1• _L Z . Lb =g L '" 11 W Y 4Z: - , i n II PE,' <a $ k y - 6 f i-- _ ..0-.S O e 0 o� ei Y_ 1 ,p �I k O IJE — O Yi l 1 =Fe� SOS.1 v —_ YY 'l • a�L. I ---- I I _ r � z+ u r am • m? o ,_ d• nE, I 1- fce.,H;.,... 1 a I'.T - I I — • r. • 0 �� i I �� I- _• C" 7 i+-1 „I. m4 I " I x7i.. . I ' ,NI m4 'L'I�'-\ eO'- FT—• {JY m _ ti II 1 j1 m ErE° E- i II. _' , o �.:_: � m� .08 V) w 0 I • . z Z a • E G,H, I ,&J- 22 ��l ,f l _ I E r,3'._ , 1 e a a F s B� E _ $ �, i. 1 I h.. .. h• : tea y -. I M z- �1 der, p�N ` r,:I k�::{�I 4 r ^ice' Sda.-Tl Ii., ` <_< as f-. ' 4rreat.,ar 1= >y ,-,. v 1'� ^�' . ^y"j,. rcc,[ ,. i t��'Lih'�r k--r 6 F 3...__ _ �4' d '+.'T. CCs. ti -!1 Fgate Iry - d ,- i" !r? ?ii a -T r a . ,2e5 @ I- e B r,., 3` f °' na.�� !� i *4L ., @ 561 . A .1 �! � 1 r t E€ n91 5 l 'i. 8 5i x it t li ii e i I I' laj 1 _'' 1 1—,—,--, �'f Y 1 to P ;: \ o.L1J&'t' A F & �II i a°ddI, b 3;'3a3 € N' F BT - 1 I��IC i w s' "tp &v 1.- G �� dv c x ''" 1 r , �"`{5 9,p r'• }ia y t,+ n ti [ 3 al —. tee t yt -' C a ex add-..;LEA ; - I ,— 0. -- F.. ° 3cz:-- 4 §N • Pu�'vrn' ', 5!Lrit'Sa §B- h it, C .7 r.,,"F4'i �^ " i,-sv /t/ , ,: J1 e >; ' �3 y —I _z a '-i 2-n s R �''V/;Iit! f a� g m I y Bs r v f�p9114r� la � t S"n F ', EY, i LLB r1 { n E II "u 1� [ � �1 - t€ Ya5-cn i r-z j' > -Ff�rft54 r 4 Q'1a t ,-, �y 6�al€s " -pep *. vwz �m ;i -$rr :1 „t A_g-„us �� y [ t eR,7T�'1 riS<A , b-' ' f 1 11128 x II ''', d ra*3s4 ,.. '� r Ri. His `'r t - 1Fr" r ei�i i�Bffip �B6Tft't` 'Z WAWA rya v r t N Q knit-n-4% k , 1° o , a Ii Jo F - 111,091 pr`6p I I' t C 1� liFi!rpCj 1[ 11�V�_li�. rt p` eglh: r'Bn,p1 br 9 rr J h 1Fbr l'Gtolj i. T! i, -sir yk:J ,amm,tFB�1�I dR11E'it +Hi 1 ail' F 1 ,:. a �""' .I m I� 1( p A 3'sK eI Q t y 1 A-4,,11• .2 .11pF f gpil W z 8 s� vp C I L 4l B M¢H s ta 1- c a' Z ,ry �l I C d .ap � 144 ,R„FI xi d t 4 . - . ' t � G H :1 &J 23° r Gr��� A .e+ _i I(tF a.wow :41 u3r • • Illaq1IIPFWI ”i“..-, A t H %vvi J tr,a a"Era k411/4/41:---.1I''' A t r 1I +- M Ipf i NI p _ q°VY€` a 4u 4 1 ^^44p Y R.p61f+1 1%rit(fa aI'j 14 whi, y 1I.:1,;y1 aA! h ! [ =9 : 6 [gerI I V• P Z[C h gl l v 11 ,fl t Q6r°aleibil 1 A01 14 c•I V 1� u Is 3q 4IU l . ry f1rt1y 1 I11 vii p ° ¢g313��I!5 f 14 4 F ig A}v,b 1P'III i if I ligIltilr4I ry i ��:49 ! "Oisi l�'C4 11! <i"R+ �.: 1H,,11, 'iltn b ,e_we'_ tarp�epel 1 BiLtlttitt re.tf I '' J,: —0.-• v1Eo w! ., Lz 41a FEN ®y C { a y e I.A r faP ibt t z �tPf i�Fttef b t f S.*ji v--_ 4f�4 {it: c- z Z c°I€€g f "� . djpp a 1�fbds1� I 01,11,M,-.,i plA3p A, W 154 1 o c 6 l i1 1 ""� dliyua4,( Alf 1 11 illluF ilfliy ti L qq p�� s �£ P 'far i'F bl 511 i Vl1 1 t G4 C.x� t %' r tell 1, I =7-.1 (jG g1�{ t . , E veB y ti t _ x E�eu I y ¢ ° b $1 l .V. 2 A y fl rr i -!a Av ' l q- i '� I Cit' iiGi Qit' TA ttkt ig4 f9 1p@lija,t iit :1r M-rg # gait'i a t . !i Af= P i pp d 111111111.1111; U, w 0 T_ yv • i Z Z CQ C G,H, I ,&J- 24 5i .... mg :4,)1 ,7(tctra E ;Cr r rsayap rrp,',��'' far ,ii Ect- c7I,' e` .. 0 � ii 5-' -1F 14E1 Ta'n'7"41 ill:14447 1111i 1 • 1."� <. s Alt, yy < 4 N 41 MIMI-1 In 'ilr l maw' x 1n pr1 PiP t r9 rat,Lipiril 1 1 1141 iiFFio k w tti ,44r 9:i &I HI ' S 41. o fi.4 e` 61 ' rs"1I WI grid ila €titg. 1 Y an w 0 2 • Z Z a 5 G,H, I ,&J- 25 s:ei • I E--2.---tipii._ n , ...,...............4.:, .n"..,.... , trt._,..rx..,....r _ isfittaii,....44...... . ir.., __a...a _ . .c....,_.....„ _ _ c .. • . � $ V n f rI— t � res� . I ( N In , o Z 3 §7 • d sm pt i I I�'I _- .. � -� > J� 1 a+ W IT :I _ sir ' m II. if t= -- • q c 1 s I, ' • ze i, i • EI e .S I S e tj V) w 0 2 Z a E G,H, I ,&J- 26 is hY 6... =4/ Nir • :... I ./ IIke I c-= I . I I. II Lea• till mr IZLiI a`s, 1.(/ S "ae1 1 y I` �I - Iv%• y11 4 If ismI i �/' y • 1 j `:, z d s J l lt , Li < � � }1Z I � i :S . -.4.11_,A.,11 ,,, Ij 1 I� I,i . I5; i '' 1L I9, t1 rr.- I ." :,:• 5ell • N w 0 • 0 z T. Z Q E G,H, I ,&J- 27 e •iF i;2r i.ki • .. „... 41' �.�� I �„11.,„,.„''1'1M. e dtp ;sal° � �� W !m� 1! A.Id& ° 6W s� It i r i'r[ a it/ -`n s i.s li i� 1 e� o ligkec i , ,1 r�H°f° 1 rlr r�rly „ n bpxg 1n,l - gld. v@ rrl�i., .wh, . 4s { /,�ifi'a 40{ .41;', �6m "; H„ti III i �OI�ppinnf,W[I)4Fja s..ai 6`:W 4Cn�fiGirrisi� l,4 Tr Q IN j�``ilaYinl�l',u[�r(� II �°,,e ski ,r,l�1.;M1 ��144,ik�'�”, U Q = 1lGhVg t QC 7 `% e sAsa` tl NI Ii� --Z '� �'I • • 3 N�is+fs5','41 ,a10 r I�� s 7$�'y.�. O Z Q =yl�j�vi��(�� C C uai li:p Q 3 - ..,,„„,,dii ii„� k I [€L a iGO^AP ^ 1 a `” noel i 1€k.:hrip n W Wg1L d a = _ 1!?.rap ru°t°f� S...x Lii ,�P 9�Im�I I ? r �-e Wf�4 r/r ITT' '�' a 6'an(r°r��k t e;V uP1�ly,ER ri-VI j11 •'P IT a a rt i1FFu 7,. ,ia•41,4 91 i,- tirf.P44a`nF'6'f 1( ag hill; ul °uL��y °4W�Ir J C Pf 641:01:1! �r We �$ KR �jtlj! °�°¢:,lki 444 044 -;:@ —'� yell^ �Ri°I�iilgq f ;g nS)A ,4k ME litici :I ' I '1 a nY6i I[aftlC cI iii�i�l 4 I'' Nu, }. FP ; ri Ith,2. , g € h w 0 2 Z Z Z 4 G,H, I ,&J- 28 I • L i? ....-di • _...:t ...h. ..-...r. 10114 _._,:,,_,,, in ''it:::;e:-'4-1 in pm .n... iirilf-;itge1±-7-4- Ritlir 1.'.: " . pAlni!.i-r=5.=*=zii isi 1 • Irabuli,i--- A:,==1 ,FA, , ihr.cri,,„Ncg-Ac- piv 1 ofi. A:ripe NI, 1 ,, Jr till. Allf lilt ikii'%[1 -.. -= ` Or; thl [L2 1014 filidilti 7711 II■4fr tip TV Nir z"4?;:---'";*:-t; MINI4L10::;".-it-57 R11rl 't I'p ' -r'-....- i iE,11111:1111.iiirdi zwitrw,i171199.. .1/ 1116; itsikr,Niptor -,, A09110911%ftatril a w iir19-11111f:1 -= IL th. e Iri' til, , Ilitir1i 1 1 il- I 1 1 miggpi , • ''''., glipinit ix tlitii.1.1 I \ lal0Eptli. < III N.,3,..*--„_.t._-27 L- o.t..i! in, illm, It I-tgr _•-r-r_---- 7; lk 1,11 H..1 ,,—a-..:.7.4.- — u c _ — z illy prir ,L=E- --ai,-4--. 9,r til.q:1 --ff----_ 1 - it 1 i < ni[ -'-' — — P61/I hi' 1-1--MIE - Id 1;.fd'''111 -...-c---''.7-'cl .- L ;II 111601 i,.. Plt a ttir ' ,,2:: ---"t.7, • iii,fiviirli ,:Z t_Tf5 itOOGUit.1 :,-tiii-1 la rih IiII:04,1 t j$:-: arPlidl'T 1 ”M71 'C'- hirldhlliiii tal'ijuil l: actr;; LiLlt miliiii?,*- 1.7-3 illiPit41: g.et.tarel viui 0,,iptV1 - . ' sfir 'Ila irt 1.1; v_r, Orrli: W-6Et= j-ff I tqj R.4 31:,r-1001*-- '11Firibti l'i ''' ±-v:=4.1 114110 .rlivr , ,,t:. i.r.:]. lag f.Pi F-.71.R.i, r ,n4i' it pc ,i, ,_ ,_.„ ,, 9;:214 se 44111 ompiplimiliii NTS n-=. 4-4 11,21 b .11“1:3.1:1;;;13:1;1:1 1.411 ii e -,ZYTh'5 '==4==-a t; -1111;1MI'l P .. 1— . dr ,i 314:4611111priP gmEill filo otklig. _ .2- v, 41.1 e . . z . 4 E G,H, I ,&J- 29 Ittatiati.I - 13 z � _ - - �' .I O O 1' D I S z I o _ _ a z piiggg�p, Ifl' k u Ed / � O gggglt'Ip r^?t, < N4b y�#� r-.ems... 4 '�_ life P14 11 d 1 3 pp a I� li �y1I uu t,I, i 3 \4 19fl r .."'ryt5�' 111 1 C �� t{ I4Eltt tll p f e 1z21 � . 0 — Pi R Irpppp�DF i.o :J JI� V iv gysigi �i 1 f�pF1��I11 ILL_ E'�9'���e3 ik lw'll "'1 I.' 3 t6�VBZ'��I1!d110' m 11,1j� I $ieYrilit �,�: @SIG �p� fY't p �i tl� i �pl�l - O 94 ie � y �""'� �A�e�'s€G;y r91,� s ' pit°;1,py4EJpf"iIg' bilk;I a l Imo. IEY �u �t'ia l'illF 1 i 1 y. p ,� ii� 1' 9� L i pl i yi a iiil,. Ik �i�ail lieu.�c� :1 - tee p usi . 141 flala�) loam ❑d� i s 16i € 0 o !i(§gI �� i ���tli Ij < @+pig �d E 1 . �P�€Bel��a ft iF� 1'f i <O 91.ells ,n1 11 ' I I ii` ; i7' k I�IE�gWp —I �I 11 �45 a li`2 'tl:@i"s a eCpri. ._ °ER 11ffri it :C in w E..iik 1 • +�Bial �' Z ti E G,H, I ,&J- 30 via _ . `_e h. U C 2 d . I- 3C u. o < a �tC `4u w � s 0, z _yy 11.113 I1 1- L r <H uF iii IIII j ! I I 1 111 IM'I<6 S = y�l I •. ALT/ _ .{/ /'• .. uW ZZ •E 1 r-�c .Sc9 a h L..I{IIII P - aC 1 1 ° - a lj te sal i {Y�] 1 d c°a w= a sr . v n, r .°illll lgiii k �..�rr].L+i1 z 3< 8 x I ,I IIII ' '• �lYi '� 111 Ore 1 I APO P" n di. .� 1.1,l�?lu a 3 M < g iI- aa• �w 7 <'� I < I"' < FE Ei 1 MSI I'+�zl�lll` m z I I�i •'ni u—Si <v y'rtilv-7 e o 1 111I� II 0 ; w ti E 1i1i _ 1 : Ie__ Ikl � 1 ii di I tilli E' !i��'Iid1: Z w 3 1• I a !"I'Ml' W ! i,! E ° 1 5 'S"31ii1 i € n` k° 11 I '� ' 14 I ! lWEEn-- H. { 11 It IIII f! s yet.!a S�6 ! _!. L 2 m I !H-I . r,11i�1 ' 'W�i m1'1111 I!11 Lei'i c-Z ii l P,Fa (I ' "1 II_ 1� 16h- 1 1 i 3 w ! Hy, ! I { ! 3U- II U < LL W uH II a =j I �a N Z .� 'I il 1 1k._. 1 z E 'J _0-.e:= rrl�I-1 I l� 4 `d 1A I o � 5 N00 11!( f_ "ill_ {pio , III trail.IIII mom I 1 nn II O - YYY1111�t� r • - I • ii) III kWl S 1 111 Z lI Z 4111. gt G,H, I ,&J- 31 .. -It 1/ •01 1 1 1 -N. 5,g` IQ. i e 0 •.L P uri ; -2- g , . , ?= I L. = = z z •.: 11 Er = 00 1 j,/, ?till: vu , RE=■ Z>1 I - z -e 2-4 . b IlKi 9---I= V Ci I E = ,--r,--.. r > ••••: 1 ----3--7,_, — ,,,, • - ..___j 11\/ ", Nvi - r/ 1 04 1 I I 2 I I —-- ' A 0 z 1 = •5• _c ___ 0 C'•= 11 Si lb . -r wii imm 1 p z ._ I 1 1:4 0 . 11 11 EC.- 1 mom V 1 1 c. 11 1_4j1== 1 b 11 I 1 4Y-:',_ 6 IRI I _ I r I w ir CCI m la 1 4 I g. Li. CO - Ep- r 1 N, 1 / I L. o —goa•m1 N 14 o ■ Z 1112 < E •rt; <' gi N to • h_.1. ...5 1 . . _ . • mir .mm0.2 - 7. . . .., II, g rn 1 1"% N ISMS— d 1 =x ] . 0 ' N 0 G. ..4 “Ji I -1- rg c:1 II _ COI-, < • _ 1.4 11 1 -1 CL - j I i______ , 1 0 C°\ 11 1 LO • > No 1 11 en a. M M. L9 C • 1 1 tyg1\ j lab( -11— • >Y ul T- u., 2 _ A -E.31- ---, - •1 11 .m..= --,..- 1 S ,• .! -It 4 - mmi n ---- . mon num 11 EgtAl I - II 1 ■1"••■■ -, Ili me. = I -il, 1 •-•-1 I I ! I =1, [I a FLA II 4 00 1 tad I 1 I \/' • • I/ 1 I a 0 2 ! r ge c. - 7 . , • , _-_,.,k : . 1-1. 1 ='b .;j i ar 2 1-1'; 1 — z e ..„. ,,..ass ,,7_ liari, " 1 7 , Z G,H, I ,&J- 32 • � ' Y �t�gxli 11 I I�'fCa y - . J Y �� � li"^ h rJ 'i Z I: tl t Mm - 4` : as li ryr 110 I1Y 1 A,kr,,. w � � 1 liu ..:. r,1 I' , 1 r.l 1 r1 a r,4 _ s p ,1 cy- ,. c { Z ` `� 111101!1 e ' II. I �_r2 ii ;S t Y: 1 @III I G � 1 ISM ' I I I I{ 1 11 K17 �F W \ Ct_11 1 1 r I:�Y9 4' -. t '� IfiII i f fl 1-J� ,i �r 1 Or i iYr , 1`ag a'" • ,.,4-4 J 7 4 @1/ t( N1f`� I'IL-.1 - `x dy St "t t ., il �J d} ,p. v€J �p III i`t�� . iY I!„ III i€� I .1., i 3/1. *( i Fr - ,F�IFI �. .�u4,,- ]i l�R, y ' ""-mow '. <�? itdll l Nil �� -x �Ir: q y J,, „ , I I� _ X ( r w G 4, IIII II f 1 f viz` '� -APk I iy h dq R ti0rhr rI a. ' ",v ' (u 31 r� 40 �A g�a�' l�l al(9� I -map: * + °--c i..-ra. 4-1-J{{k{{tra,a �.f' nm 44 <3 61 0H—..—_,E, `� �`�r Q �,, 1!10 a y4+ 4 -m rs.aa N `"� -.=p owl x�.+ + ern - Z dl 1 L . , a Z d aka ,. mss J8 r °�''ik;' Id I` Orf >m 5�� LL 0 B tort rill xre �.5®""1tii, t m 1� , — .T . Yi ,t rl0 f Epga 7 af6 pao.4 II rr Sr" � 'r x .4',•t ; W•p r ¢F f{ y 'iu ! ,t '�"- ;Q�l,pl3�Yll el, R It ��^� to t444r P C I �y eil 10® ® g 41• ,�r 1 diIIII 1 E pWTo64. +t 4, ,y�,�/r' l�E�� k rt�3], al= ctrl "0IIr1 ° ° Bc �r . t pJ :04414g-be.-` z `Yt l4111111 dgr y ,yE Calf III 31'{,r '.�dF�..s Y r. tom's :G IEq 'pf I' Y�)a r 'e V'� ,t +tiv �fliz u < ;w t— ray 1. IF, ke,�f .-�r{r� Aa[tlSI�; '5 ;71-41 III 11H1t;= Tl ^ H i•i kw- y.-, y'k r7� ' .l ls[� € en 1 r $ 'ell 1�� Y � t�%i ��t �'� E.d I� 01l r1 Y L-�� tYe �.' ry nadytl A EI uuf y0� "Pin 1 101 x f ( I°dk4S� ?4,31,,, 7-,-` rti'.0 Mq-((Ir0 R f BEg E ii91111111 �W ` r1�c I i 41'�II`�I r Elge sl N al s } . �,[� az _ ppp g 1 i s x � �� E�FB{it R! x I 1 } u r 2;,:I�I �`� ffuRyj 111 11 1 t9p1� 1 i I_ �,I 4 ,-,, a: .:st�W�q i. Gt Jl 1�["II I'�Fygl I �•r --r-_-------,-5)::;'q ! typo Ill k r P1I' t " kl�A '�:� r77{1Ek :44}E11{r?B]p4 6LtIr i �4j ^I8 AEIE{illd yEfylJl[3 ii ii 1 �..,I tfH(sj {i mil fr<t yrl I`fSlll(al a kill lc!:F t < n F ! r3§t(I�lI,V Will Igi ' rc _4- il s4, I � '.Ir IEEV� —ep1 IIII b 101 b: ; !hi C �t tyi ll° =..III°i ... ra o. 111 %1 7„,„,,,,, i° sF YS - r $p0l 1 ..„ I i'I ti °4 �IIE{I-/RI :LL. pp [[pp 6 .q GYWI W u,,4 1 01 EdiE1 Itl a lb g RI 01t yy f'^11' 9EE C N;1111 i • II it,uP t iEi`Ifpf 0e10Wei i1_ 2.1%.!„41 I 0 �1 0 1' I IL'0"0 c II dIL y0"0 ; I I I EI 1 ... Z �e�• a yEl i21I A l ,A.np- k� 'r;LE 1 ?7A 2 a-1 31' . �< Vey r�. G,H, I ,&J- 33E f. -,� C2 � f zirrF s;e? • Ii1 a�31•IIJ� � �q c 21 �P k{l li I �. s 1214pp ASP higrg6 61' $ II� I g t r ,mi. l� ❑�,� ; =y ! IR I Ell l li� , I � _ YII —1 t IS — l II41 r @' G 43 Pr ,It� a € p L -47'4 IL i Yt " 4 9 .g t A PE{ 1iI�f a„ a p tE , `` i I�ff1P r Ii1 ' - ® ∎�€ l c 1 a II i�i ii J 1 I 'fitY 1( i I!III 1lf a: ; - ' I E ( ¢ ii 10 ALA BiNrllI 1 w 1 q �_ F z !^, kr Cirkril .,mac v �iE�`d 7 �GS c O Q Q Y r ��rle Y€ LY Y 1I I II et tg 3 v ,o:!r I_I [v, - 3 N a' • a .,, I iE ' Q a aua, 7 F rrr tin 415I II II I� .4.9�� 91 I s l y� I i { ` tl3 c ! I f 11 10 I EI - Y `31 li c p i 9C°- ASH ti c�m 1. :. d�1tl.01 Vii= til 111'11, n Q c D 1. 171 • BQ4i e: 111111 1n1 y ,l 1 NI - i PSI '- LIE I �dt fly ii , m d 7. f ' , 1[ ') , is F [ py � -x- fi LZI i.. �y�9 ppp p6' _ I pp ppppyypppp �yyap{reR e III/ I�EI�91BE —1t,-4,,n Iai, liN!'��I��elli,k C �,.. _.�.�. P .v1a`e i I i S h w 0 S Z Z Q E G,H, I ,&J— 34 I „a • :d mar i!"161!!P Ii ;P71 II - ' MI RIB S > L me !1 •°IP p m ,Z , l a. .11 � � 81-1—a- s. , I. ' I ',:441- ,.,a y 1 ai 1 I .• IH W-0=. Q Q _ *a 4f > , 1_--- / 1 1 '7� '� �° _ F " Z n • ' taxi; - C7 a N r>G.� - ,-] < Q ?n 7 t 'ate-4.r'"�s a 4R�rt a W rpopst . "k,rt, ffi;i 's E"';la'�' - s PI I6 �L g I� �JsfY i!!G Ff • !!P !�!�i:dr fII I AWL.1.�63e5 @50illlt R i,PEa�l!I{ ;��. T AUK '!P!1"1 1 Th ai rc _:.' IIIF..lIE6u_ .1”. La w 0 • Z z a E G,H, I ,&J— 35 .,... Lz, -Ill ,■.—r..7s 3, • ,,z)..Ftli--.-e-----------1 ; lo „, .. i „zzItira; ..44,.. ..... .€ 7 ,.,..,. . gl Al illin I Th_nm, II I,- ee., II L'Ill Il I I 1 I L1v-,'21a.y1a1L,•.-.,1.iv.t14-Znr.-,„r!3.a1':2,•H4:, ••"''1v•,n?,IZww,2E,-r-'1nI,•"a,=-,,i-7,4.aS.m,^.v%avt,..Ie%ZLst1=`zn-1,t-1.`t f=:a g,5iT a=i.-.•lI ilI.111l i a I,;i I•i i,I __it,}r•t_--=_•”—=I 4_,{-CI n-E`a 11-t p iIiV,,1 •'I'-i,'v 1.'t 1 a_-_-- -- - 4,;1‘t.,.•4;1.;2.,7:-:?1.."':-1-:.1 L]V•ii n 1!F tI i1 Th- ----ii---'_1 l,ISI ...... __v --- . .,...,_ Z 0 0cZ<,-.:1• <0 W i • r 1 I cC -,..t.kt.-. . 71 114 -1-;-:-::"•11 TI - -..g.:,,,,„.... al ri.7-f.j'11.1 -4.11 Ti I a' ia __. --LANNI...L.-it .1 miii-iti: 1 .fin .." ' Izm-1.11 z'swil ILIA 7_,■•- irez.,+ V..31111'174:1---:11 1;11 -41 p; 1 i I di 7 I r -.L. esol,i. i....—,1 -., ,,= aaoli 104 1 . .... 1 ..... ..., U, Ls, 0 0 . 0 E z z 4 * 36 &I- G,HI„ %'I, • .B I - ,1 ifil Illif7,1-n .14+1 ' tl �^III i SE I I` r IP It Mil I mafran 1:; 1 � p p o "411;"N 11 irizami,i ,�� i' �II YII:I q z NI < n 11, , is = m ifl p , LLIII a 3 Itntari la II is ! fl III �I J1JJ p- -I-77 Tmlammini4:4,1c,r nl IF ln Ii1171 IZIII' I 7:Er 104+1 in w 0 • t7 Z Z Q e G,H, I ,&J- 37 !.:rC ..Ne ®4-i, -=]!f • .1 en [41 `ir."w7' f�'Ik is I �r��I(� I�¢py^r 17x1 S ..c $ 0 'I1 F !lillll to! ill{l p 0111�PI knlIpppMMMMpMpMp "nn jIIJ' J J„� IIGI� IRRda��,tl¢, s _ 111 111d"l ;I_ � �r,�Mll"11011 I .(1"',. § ward I AVE V CC: 8 F,`a°as4¢��■t ���llli1 lB e'L�pwu?eQ;l L kI FP42 - �a. i In v. 1lhf ���"�[`:����p9 6i•I �, ;� filially, piEEpppi p I ¢i! 1- `_h 1 p`Ff'I y°L o -ei..I� i• ”- 'Ip'p41i 71111 6p`¢°i _'11—;.111 e� a k9 `i I !' 1. d ��� q r9 it w ;��I�BIp It1,111111.E;1111 ,14 !'! 1i p ...I. s k F pio. ,t�I I,i1848 48.E11 tjt1bI „o 3 • �I l "tll 1 r I ii,p1°;1litt yip 4 II `e i ti .i 1 48 ` 143.[I{99I 1 ... �l4�P 6t7 t P I� , - I Ih6 'i 1 ■■ 11_6'.€@®.lime” 1Ril it s, - 1j pQ I q plat! I .. 1 iVi s4 1��e¢ II�IL__ pi i,¢'. s°°i°im ?'a.'I .h,l4! E o o P r w WII( a l,gltl I,@hip t Ill'�i!'!J ;pp, 7� 1. 1 o BiNgi i2P oI f _ 1411 , . t YE{i{II G s _ p 4 kP 9 1 �thi ¢ � � �I 4h!I l,�l�,�:101�1 l,: 4>,@Ina =�i� i ■Il��A • i e 1111 E N w 0 I2 . Z G E G,H, I ,&J- 38 • AlSII 1 4'W eerillri j :.i..e:3.:i_sc.:, 4 Al !6 / flI1Li !ILu• i l I L- ail,' ` K I�� ' ' 111 I1Il 1 �F� -.� 10 P11 ' II'1.:f,.11� 1,.1.E ®� I �'I II•I',I: . II IJ MIS.: `� n w O • •• Z Z a F G,H, I ,&J- 39 'i r e u ism ii. e{i _I • in 2 7745-7011 174: 1 t psig �, te I 5 ! 1€ II mo a' I I. I[ I 4 z I -P L .:, [`f a"a of gg 6�s !a C " < xv�<,- I i I =_ �4 i a9I " H In -11,, II ' a g "� a 11 IPLK pp Q II if. !� < 11 ki rioggit r �'_®I o " � i§§ f 9[ b k�i 1b ,# z vx«.I '5.'4 la k liiIii1 I _ J+ r g .Eh.'- fl _tali — —1 h y EiPt 11 '.iV _ II �' O �t I rr 1� I,1 N p ry AW-c 1 6.11:01 HI arailt5' 1 zz 4 n • 1e- za4 1 l� y -a ' 1.,147 F-' a'LIJ „a €r �I a k 3 t"I I 1 I A44 err 0x "fit c 1 3 tiLin(rt4 'MI III 1�J 5 psk Li�G3&.'.'-I�al ``�',g .,'g 111 a' $Rr p,- tit - 't Al�'Ln�Iow Lny;`LLr < ,dl`{F�1i OLE€� '' I rE "11 ��"l L4 �G4 II t i r fri ,1 9a c� it '-+aR F rc�F��C4 rr Ilri r✓ II*€fi Ø %4; r� Pif� k slain f �11 O R4,o're 3911tlCF I1 II O "�[,���oa th1Pr$aF 1 i.`1191111 Iil — ; ��7F in P ,p I:, o pnfh"�IIr'',11'"„ I IT111 'II9I[' I za Lip iEiL�1d' j I�gLB1:. I < Z �'WYW�i lnl�� ��B"�� ,L f 0.O NN ��'',,tt 115 � WI 9-rzi INq lIr @E1J,, �� C4 ER It it T4 `i111 c, F,r' II - 3 �IIc6E�B:�fii�� ,ruDii < F IH« ll.!,/ R3 w co ',Agri ats-g€EI p 5 ��"L"IPOI I i of rvii Uw p� 5.1:1 6illiil1: Q a "v a...m G,H, I ,&J- 40 ipli n_f1 gl e • 4 ..0-.GZ i .51 y -` I CC LL @ a 44 I N 0 a N 1 MI 7 . CC u v y L if ...,X Y J 0 itCc 0' a v — F `4 1Ilil /'i tt 2 I -!Z e (V O Z y3 e" • W I� x I� z< Q 11.." E z I I Q< 3 ~ m = 2 —_- yYI v i _ a � k I I I 3. 1 I I 1 /z -�J c2.. 1 z . q- i II °_ I Y �� 1' K� 7 E. X sn 1,_, C I'' Ii _ z - f _ I - 4 5 I - ° I Ii -- II' II IP �"' I 'V�� < f/v v slai J V) w 0 S • v Z Z Z a 5 G,H, I ,&J- 41 ti. E!' ■••si .-.5 K!, 0 .-, H _ gie 4 nt, ,. ,...1 L17 > Lt.1 -J ec L.0 8: , I - . _= _ , Ca: -74.? IIIM U I.'1 -I 11.11°^1`? ram i. tc(1 Wi-I" I I 11 Mk, , 12:1k 1-±-1- ›C I 0 cc- I II 17 1-±t k '4 • - --- • I 1 --, Fa,•- b..., b r "CT fli. (.1 .._it ■ .4- 111 III 111 i -""" I I " as i =a 1 V In =imm 1•11111= M n!..? niTz -E'il II LL 1 4LI-1.4-1-II III 4 I i ? II El- I 1-11 11A II I , _l 1-1::1_ey T--- c 1 0 I 0 ri- 1 "' V? r., 1 IIIMM ■ a l'2 . OF YYNIM Mx ' I 1 =b. 1 1 Il 12'.' I :rr.r",--1-- r 1 illnaell i SO ri_ alai! U) LIJ 0 0 : fil 1 Z 2 4 E G,H, I ,&J- 42 i .. . :.eY i/4 rum!:,'I rU • e: •I llllllllli`1� _ .: .-. r _ TOP Slrg�.951 !111111111 tY.§i = nala E k� .. t ! d i'Yi in't SIB a s 3 �� �;141,1: €5giki't 8 ' I ■ 1 IY 5� �€ y gY-1 it„t4 40;# 1! III 1 11,914411� I�-�IFili1 r' R e 4� �rF.,. 4, FIRM'j i ir� t Fkrt11111111! rr rr; YY1, �tilr1 ,J51 rl .'� l�A 1[hi rfgfEl ,k,CP qr Yi '. E . 1 ... !'1Ii7 It�sY,l �e.Fr3�,vk a•40. apt 63 pIII r �r�rr<�e{`'r9 ��I YJI�rc4 iIII1l7 k . I'rIS t 1 1 frq E 3 a { I r i q �p i / 4 r,.1-1.24.1 rq 1��J r.1 I 1 E Sa�411f YY�I YR�� Cllr Il _ g 01 A:c i I 1 pit:,+ 9 _ Q _ .,ri°e 4st �o� '' _ tC sIi'3 E rt _ r. 1-4-ti-f=x F' (-1 Z ID R ,t €gtlr,Es`� ��1I I rr rs•• I Noi� I YYI 1 - ¢ r N. 7F c> I k a 1 t i�` , YIIEgI gi E€ F i I m Ib,q 1111111+ tic-WO-VT' "I 4I I < ai1�: e`a 1 pF4xc xs.e qY q 7 €tE11 s tE ''�'®— ,_., Kg fag .9 Y R E{E S .Y ! i V 3' ypgz�s g1.t�, E q 1 i f F I 149 t—_ > I 'R { Rr (Gar E r�"jil tq E! II riiiiii �I �. i Rq I I b I�ey1E[ Ck !Erep ygi--�i 14 d R rl 0 -I 1113 1 C 1 €q l't f ! AS p��.® a a ,�8 es Y” 1'.Y.O PqF 4;IF It. � : ;1 P ' r�4 tqit 1 1 I tF eRS[r`gI6€�I I.Fi p�io { R I i��9 '031 E'1®I 11 EEYii °il F ii���Ii�Il l ! 3�1p 1 r-. iiiF: rg0 r01 II' 1 Mil r IPII I ' iR+ nI 2pp1I1 i �Iy�yg�I s JO r 12 'E t=1 E�YE�gi �Ifi€tygg a j 1•IIIIIIII� i 9 I I1 II I oq r 1Ii„ 1 , Tr 1 la_ e€ Y IqI� El , `9 ,, hR .'- FYH„ �PI :_ 1 5.11 :„,..,9„„„.I u' EAFL Y.bS ' J. Y eg e 6 E5 E N tu • Z a 5 G,H, I ,&J- 43 . t., .1- = .= ,_/ i 'A "II, f mmui .- 111Parlibir '--- --ti ' Al 11±1,16Piliraill -. " I I-1 MR r ' 'f ,1,;1''4 .,-,1: 1„:" 2 Fr o G . =. 1.1 '01, ni .„ rat!.;ri 1 9;IL ,1' X < 1 - CJ ., ri::1' -H. - t NI Z El. Oilit4 quo.? n, . rti .- A Ift, . .:, z > - - • (WI 1—il ' • 2 ,- - ' tl . .. .. . ..,.- , li . " ''' 11 MIMI .. . . -5 tbrgid.I . ity; '''-' LT.] 1 Illin I' .' . libil IN . FITT-11 . -. - . =Th. 1. InligliS• ' - lait' 1.-- --1- ... ilatilIfilaallfs -- 1 11/4 =I =II . 1 — ' lil {I Fl1±11. \El t , v) L'j 0 z0 E 1 III/ z Z 4 G,H, I ,&J- 44 • -4 ..9-.Ir 1 .Dl m„pe • I {- - , I <_ :J^I i In I sH I _ ( I _ am • y I , ' I\ i. . III. u li� Z' . > I I 2°o0 _{-. I I 1 f,7r,�'m 1w 2 1 0 1 ro -Yw �s • -m - II .3 o I �� z 1 PV 1 II ` RZ= 1 -+f I ' ' I Ct _ — -1.- a 1. II L; / a - , U = a Q - I . ° -0Z Z vn II .rr ..o-.s a ^• p �W Pi < 14-1- I c 0 cz `1'0"• III >1j m X ry i m m - C? , r�r 11 x 1. - N :i]ti' N MN mry I ,I __ 0 !iC 'I I > III \_^5, �'i J V — —� t; 5 II I `3=- ;Or- - has. v` II Jw:' II 111 .a 21_I y II 1I o` ',,_ 1 7 II j^ 'T r{ ctII4 -k In r— . 0 1 o j _, 7—E4 XI O I ; I E.', [ I ge Z ' I Y_1 • i 1.- G G 1, ,&J- 45 Y the .9-.it AI _ 3 dta , s.Yv • .c ChCo , o r.Dx 3 1 f g y f� ,n: II � All Ila ��. ��� it I s ?. I U a�. ' o 3 I1 I / > , L L o I o ,-71+--_I �I 0- _�_� JAI �av I cz 70 u r-e I O eo -/-, �� mrn- OO C Q Imo, \/ / �h O it- N CV It Z C re ¢ . ` ¢ _ " • L— u o 0 o. o F � t 1 m - •remux ` ' I II mox4 I-, [a] y • m g 1,._ Qi 'll . _ I o 1 I U - F O - '/ I J ) I °'n? ..._ a x I � � {Li N I_ Luc? I_ N MN • , m_ ai y . I 0 m, i I __Li L4 I I /L IL 11 c-II IITN l'11, �2 'C ..a I I 1 }-a -II II III I . i r: I u.4 v1 �CiG1 I W j mm I I I, Z • G,H, I ,&J- 46 --,0, . MI I 1 1•10'le' , . II _ 1 i- lw g ,... ki , ,..,, E I I • Pa MI! . ..7 1— I 4---- a. , , a R' 11111 z " m 1 , ,1 , 7 I 1 0 _ 114.:'-' 14T al I R, 1_4 _ i -,- , 0 m › . 4 fln I,, , I, •2 I 11 cs H i c? , 1- II 5 ,-- _i___ 0- i- - n11•111101 i_ a4 - to 1 i I=I= I 1 1 I Er= 0- 1. LI 0 r- _ ii a. p I 70 1+1---_-_-- I ' ' i• _ _ I ca 14 1 1 il= i 1-- ° I I)'• ' . w 1 0 I x : :',.- En co t— ! 0 F < F-7 III ti; ,/\ V e KI On ' N •• CA z I I N'>.Y /\ CD --,, I LIA.--• "0 Z _ _ -r. r____y_ • I „ . 0 < _ .tro_ . — • rn g Lu L1 ñ ;t V 11--- 0 ..z .R , 0 . 1 . — r -21_,--,- • --1- ---)7-,, T - das , u. 0 1 1---,,,? Ri xl , A, Iv:: I 1 i_ ..._< ,I- 0 a "f N 02 .0 el MI, X ty _y__ -- _II y I I I _i 1°1\4 I I— I > ,-114 "I I \ PI Fi / — i I I— eH‘ - tv ' Cr \ . ■ - I 1 ' A 4- a, e_._::.- 7 4 1 :6- NoMP 1 1 * III Lir.16 ' ' IIMANS -1-t- I 0=r; r; iii I -11-etr ill I - ■T-,--f-,L4Vh I 0 I 1 '__Ir I L9c V) t 1 I I 1 --4 -.I- 1 1----' --,-. ---i, , 0 I C) --ir. --/.= i ' X , j 1 '-• H 2:I' Ee . am AEI . • H 1 F. I ' 1 1 / 1 1 1_ I ,,II 7 a z -----1 ,, - ---P el =- 2 1 11 i m G-, , r;&J- 47 A- (:` DI i', • -r-r— 5:7 1 Tt Lt . N Lu i, a i I.1 I tt k I L , _ 1 .. ' ,______ _ I .- , = z I z E 01 -- 1 1 A C3., X 1 I Ti '—'.zh:12"--' ! I \ aiMMIII 'ix IF , I - = 1- mri 7 -.., .3:4_, II I r. , H - ---- .,,.. 1 - > .., -., * 'Li lir-----t- ———--—— I, — =27'4• >T-'- 7. ' I 1 II —f-1-1> .i:L,' I ao i — Ill I > 2', , ,, I 0 1 3 II_. ,, __=,_ _ . r I 52 -- I I Qr I 4 2 IMAIMINIMII — EL' 1 • .--F- 1 ass 5 t, [ _ 1 0 I 1 I 0,0 it -n-- 1 • , lawommi ./ 1 t ffi I co u., 4 I 1 ,, .1 tfl — ''' 1)c. : -1 I. 0 1 11-r: g t■— 0 ■4, 15 E_, ....., — \ A -L jV't? 0 I k \ 't/ ''''I, '- - 1 U 1--1- K75/\ -. 0 i ____ __ I < 0 ...r 0 al < .-., = CiD r—, E_, < .frr - '71- p. LT, , ---ti. >. ' , . . - I i - =mr.h. ,N ll -Fd --, 11 1 ° II N ' I- .54 ..5, 0 ,—, 1— 11 L . ' ' — - flI 3 11 0". - 1 , ' ,11 -...... 7--, i "1 V -FW—Ime • c., h C "'F -nci-i J—, 11 1 z , z 07 eN . LI-11/47 00 r.1 ei I 11 I 1 . .. . 1■; LW __ . > LW II \ M I\ / —ft gi, I. K. 0 I \ I Lw S_v_i_ : ..i N.!ij ma= I -1—, - -i ll I n1S41- Fr"I "IIITZ ' _ II !II alinn. -==mm 21.eJ F I ji I 1-1,--7 .1 i, no.= 7-keN -..-- 1 i D I :wri I ta 1 am, I R, ll I \„/ , 0I0 II '\XX -j I ' I I 0 = I 04 co a a 1 _x .„ coo ± 1 II L li i - C - z z sE t 0 G,H, I ,&J- 48 <I1j 4: � �. s n rnn s ,Eo 4F § C � �isp lei kC lIl,P F l '• trlflri t�igCie III 1 ICE€rrs t6 o3 • t p IY fgtqpG-o Epi ti i l - • t 34 n MP�dg Ii ` i al+lil a n'i i - t1:-:{ 1 I 11 Ai I1h rc tY 0,, _ „ • ly��t�44 @[i"' S, s'� e.52. @rf `(ill Ir� 3 tO f R cz mow. (i ehfpl s F�rtS epRi al '11.7-11g,1 'It 1 1 ' c = ' o ch€��ll.� � t l ' �` _II� N Q {,113� z z- c • n P TI c { „ < iplg h E-, t f h t.u1 t I [�F ��t 7 e t.i II11-. Cy w L 9,1 5n ' @ I i HI •, �m. O m �p 'l � �l5h u�U � a rl t q 31 14! -, a lF,4=4t �i 1 4 I H e 6 ea— F.:"3 i 83t z) ,:,,,, t . ° tz i -, C,I.4-.';C.11`CE-4--;•44 '. . tr = l rt� a A i om:'II IF c - ttI I E EI r !l` 'f � �E II i�{gI II i iiiil u i� Y. t lif E Ig` -- . .•Ei 4,01I'1 pia Ar n ' i e -1=1P�f3y ! 7 �1 CY II. iti . f- 61 , l7 •i 1E03 114'- ° i •� IVE1 I I�i9 u�>t 'I°ti O • 61111.` e�I;iE0w w�€; I _ z 9 rill!'(9iul ""I' e . ,H, I ,&J- 49 WI�� , a !li p= ':u 4,„_ , ,„:„.. , j,,,, ,, :1 . .. �r TI pa PM ea lit 4 it : ii=IT,.. Ia -; .. 17 ? '1 0 II . jl ' ,1 6.vsravo fitartb• yr.Ems��� 1_,lf - . { al,il =1H kE.'ff_ ? iR CL) CI. I I , II I-1 -�� 1111 3' t�l��� a s, � r-, l I I I r- bI I I 7 ![! L..11il › iv, 1I ' 1 I I •,! I IJ III' 2 ii II J'" 1..11 l i , L z� Q _r°i ., Z Z, Q „' • . - I :I 1—I—j `; tfigleggil r H• ..., ,I = ii°. —I co :c. R+ A., i ! iliSral min 13'TT - • d'., 11[� p� , -1l - a I``LT TI_ I • H I &J 50 I ;r`v lionvig "--=5 5.6its`wego 'i�_'.�I s.Atli • °p�^E it num ;�=e ii4 rgiNlt9 1H FFI • 1 I I I l friE yl06 1 11 - pIP ilj 91, o ���F '1111111! " — ayt `4E ,i� " Ai � C t1 a•.. •re.�vid6,1p^'E t.j a . ,,. 9�����H 61'hj"1p11!111 , 12 s,„;‘,.g a�i y 1 I 111 Ii '- e- g5r"a`-1/1 01 1111111 1111111111 PUP! Ill - - : ,M!!! w�Iab II II II �II hilllGG II i I�r� qq `'&vs Etta i 4l III I iV I,.ulat H ifiii!d (gl111111 Igo! I > $ 5 Pli 6"E51 1 ix II d 1 �tll' yh 9 yI El. g MI�� u,l IFII ut i H I fd ii.�l ii al .I i i �I ��, � � �1I I ++I®g o I�III ol€ld�rinfil� III F , pp rA t fr s 11 F.7illi Ii TIJ o _�a bq se.i't :J aS� u 2' t��I �t— I \C-I IIII �re`Ik��; a�IWII�1, del 0 r.LISTS-i 7 1 14`0 t1 {9 ti`I I1Fr3'Ix IV o.I ,I p - O It \ 11 Iiol.4F1 Fp�hFi1 Il.. o. I$F=i ' II I S4` ' I ill ��iIi pl'i 6i Iec t -"71-II `0 0 kit 1 TI— Kell 1 {{1S Y t r ` n�I 1``! I or!6E�;i�r �rIiEI 1 yN 4 _ • ai"?es2"z�eez.. �– 11 e i i 1 a x Iei{a Z _„ It1IItr ' 1 'Ali a ¢ 0 r `FS9 • , � II II �� ° �n1� I II (Iitl II `�' I�ititl it Ho i .;.II1,txh �Il=_ gBtF a g Jru t !tl li I cii ryp ( �lb`�� t k l "Il!€I ;I I - �� POY�GI I�' 111�11CI{yIg$ppdltl0l��p@f0� 1 SO„,:.‘1,4‘;'!,,,577;1[11,13,1 3 pr- '.-_i F alit`I i C'1! 2 !p_I, iE{ii !Y&I i lil•S it�'1 1`1!4 Di ._ '.'..I i!i[i€ iF id. G i 4•h I 1 11.11 �d. EEI�9�11 III Y e l iø' IIIIIIN _ .1 �41iI-Ii i48g1.1 z siitlI I:I:I-.1::111 1111111 - RIL_., �Iil� 1111111 1 E Imlpru i -. i i J d HO 1 to E 1.1:11;6 \ 1 4, _ •`a it. IIIIIII 0 cones_<< _ IIII e ,H, I ,&J- 51 i° .. .. h,_ ° �aela f E . e p4p -d ih as 6 }- Y a2�t WeoIAS_ 5 V� t I a j' i6= 2', �(s s i sas s;r, (d falaal UI v typal, A l ! apt = egi ! tea p1151I (IM_ _ lila 1 Viii � ABa • !u ti!!i 1 � l G�Ee r R _e e I L .� I- — 1 1.1 1 P _' .A 111. P _ ,; !. 1 e j. 41 F ili�''a " ; gtmAI'j A :J.` � � ' ��. li�; L.` 4 �. , 0 1-.L 1 iIILg JIr1I" �� s�, �I �,"el 0 ea ! ( 1 31, li" I , , ! sg ,L A 1 , -, / 'I ii lI fl, A 1 i'1 u 4 gYmg_1 ' , 11 it `01 � En a1 : )1 r b� � ! TIP L1D -_ - I r=( � t '�� A ! � V" I �,�I � �'� 1 € 1 ' i .� 1--_.-pj9II11jI I 0 . •I I I i fk—, , r i— O `� , `�I I� ,. I I j�� , �1i -• I: • ^ " �!r 11 1 I I 7` I 1'i ' ti,. -T If•1 - 4 in I .' hI Inc _ a rI ...,' i 1...1 .. _ ,l IIr 51,EN . ----- tl 1 `IT�1i` 1i 9 'J5 �ri'�Y f' - A J I 4I �t 9lt ;/€ r I �p ::.-.r. - , ri —� I 1'�1 i � ! { ��.,) �. 11 -�. - -_ - . ' 1 c i q I 1 '8 @ is € r V sj €1 It ja Hi a t f j ?i jj j' l+p ;f, £. s : A 3:I ! pI as iv @ @ 6 i i:� C ! ? ° ? n1d y�i ? [ 55p':il ill oljz ;II ; 4, Z 41 -' �F s zz •I. y liWM !I F �. f @ 1 E' A6 6 !� A 3l A Wifi p`iEi ii�#' � gj ={j •j! fyi $ i'Q ll�l y� !li $8 l� tl in a% s s § [ �A: S IEjB$ g{[ S13c ill I! +l fii gI s gg gg ! i q s5'$s E @fig : sE1 1If . !; € :ga k& 4! s@€` fi! 1 seal 1! 1 eft!' H $� $ ;� §t & nE fe a1g ° !°! ii ° !:` lIfi ' 1 !@lN !=A Iria111 !IIIado s aa,°" fit at61i �Dt E ? i €ap �!l S. ! la al l s 1 it �it r a ;Va E_ nit talc s. 3 1 1 &J- °" '52 t at b n i t 2 v.is I s € Q@ t a it ::,.. s q. It f —l � )7_ 0 1 , y —^ 4 1 p . b l i Suss • 9 P car. E k G ° € JLI I tt . • • tli� fi` i ��i t 1K � 4_,_� 1 k g°I ---c— — �6 ` ,,, 41st;. • lss gae J ,: 41,P. r 9 1 t� 97 It s t.. @901 91 go B II B 9t ° @, Ill IN 1°�1p i@ tlh ° g@8 1.ti e t 'Ali 11 E io lit @@ t ti611'+ ' '-if p/ 1 i '11 1E Hi_ «; / / iNi! a i!L _J !!i E ft . (iEV;; f i i 1 if t `1i t ii It . @E FE ea 9 , t t 9 1 I ...,_. ..„ . ., __J-_,-,, _,• __ , „ : , 1 , 1 I t 1 i 7, „ , j c 11' 1 1, @ _ t i I t 1 ®®']y qqq° 1 1 if i','is ° SGG ■ 1 1 @e �@ ;1@ s , ., 1 11 z1 et 0I 1 I � I i@ v I.1 1 i 1 ,4). - 1 L — ,i _1 i t @ ip 1 ' , * tr . lil ----f ! 1 1 I §e I ti 1 @ I 1 @ .i , c .b 1 1 9 ..� 5 b ! 9, t 1 1 1 .ca, i it' e uws uxla ! : @ u G,H, I ,&J— 53 a t bar. •al F i Y e 1 h. 2L' 3 1 i g .5g i . ei • °5 • g / ■ * EV 5 1 i dill 1 1 1 fl li ! 16 1! IP II .1 Yr'i i z ti g 91 - -11! i m 5 5 I HIKIN 1 /11 . 1 li • 5; II! I l' 1 I "" v DP P111 11 1 ?ti ill, . I It' 111 0 ii !I\ Idi ■11 I 13 g . ; go , I s _ c., c 1 !A e i I i r 1 1 / . ■ I . . -- - , __ ....(//77-- 7/ '/- cad wow Of tISD3 €:TI I . ,,,- Fj 1 . 't' ! I. a , ■- i I [ !=. — . biriew, ,3 . 11 t., _ :LI: 7 , , ii I i NI. .,. ._ e a vat stool I . — gm . - --I" 1 (1.-- I • i . all - = 7 1 .--- li • .1, .-1, r 41i 'all ?t,444 1 1 I ift -.• %A• A'F-„,..-L 1 r 1 1 ---i __. . .. , I i hi ... ,,,40).44,,,,..„.... i .. , -.-- ..,,V a ,-.1,1 .,4,4"-t-tittf * ! ' ,II ma, , ,•-: ,It - . t. ,,_J I 1 1 ,170,7, il : -,- '1,...1 ' 11 woo - J1 1 i mg I■1- : k . Fi. 1 ' ', IN , t .- 11 .4 t.414 i Ell ,, ;1: i -- , , Ilk 1 1 1.,,,,i r ; .1. 1,... ___A : 1 ' I 1 1 I • i (–) 6 . 1 : !r• 1 !..s.altics',4 I .1--- 1 . • _______-_:-.1::=g-117-16 ' 7-1711r ---at la 5 7 I nap ' rri+74 : I pa% I L_ a rtilnEll.,* 't an. D - , r I:, SO:4'1; it ° .1. i 1 1 : ;-,,, ' . :V ; , 1 I Irot,i I ; , II. 1 I ' , ', ., . EMS= i 1 11111111111431MMIIIIM, .:1 __..... _ , r 1 II- 1 - -.: . E, 1 11 it I 711 ----- ---EHi-i— Ho Mill u No.ii Its it dr -:-.op I ; ir, l' ... e 1 ; .; ...... 1. F.:- -1(1!•1; 1 1 li , i 1 i a ' •• ' ! i 11 -1 1. – ---r- • r4.4 I ' 1 1.411=1113Er I I/ 1 I I 1 _ri: 1 ,.,, I Id + ., 'Uri lai:Arkl 0 VIE j ;", -tr. I Ili i 1 - b- -,1119i I 1 I l IP f I t>44 i I )444))4% I ''l III I 33YldCRE='t— ociorroplms i 'i. ■• . •— - — ' I i 'H • it ( I I ' I 1 3. . ' • ._ , e . .1 , , ----, , . I . I; I 1 1 ''. 1 t • -. ; . , 16 ,.. 1 , Ill_ 1 ( ' - I 1 I. ' . .. ik • 1 ' ' 1 _ 1 (gist Li.nu) -- ,ic – , I – -- - a – e .,. • — il c--- 1 , 1 1 ' ,1 1 I 1 r- r t b f I.•,. :t of ' 1 . : •-,„,„a, G,H, I .&J- 54 I _ If 51 1 1 t • le ; Snit 6 5 a q:41 ' li 4 5 x xii naafi - I . . fai : hila( M IL I i It §i 4 0 ... 1 ig:I 1{: g i g 5 lid 1 il4i 4 1 1 n 1 ;e- ce I I' , .._. i glie iter_ hit 0 E 4ig 1 ii; ig 1.11 lal nil II :1 a liaaa 1 ili \ 11 h !„,,, xi —z— a iiit It , 1 i _ e • I • I ; a . I 1,-.:•,,I -I 1 .-t t , '1 I.. _- r 1•1'.7..L.-47-7,-.; ,.--,-, '._.'•— s2t, , - I., , .1 ...- • 1; ,.- .:,5.••7s "---zzre ars,. ii le" /.„ - 1 -- ,rs f...,se a-,,,,,4,--It a,,- 1:p , .. 11---! I /7 rt or 41 - 1 H ..././ 2 ,I fit: t 1 /r - sirr, 1. 11, I ' • 4,att. Aire r.,: / 4/; ZAt 47 .iratiersa reir +1.3 : --c---; ,. --.- i , ,„, 1. ,4' err' Per ip.' ; h.-- •:-•, t ,,,..\--r. - 11-----------.T1E•ll.1 .-ir i' .4" I r1;4741r/S- /77,17,7,0779:J.,"tri":4 11:11,1 4e------ -- ----‘1. ' r --1.- ' -'4',F ,'', yzer.d?: I. ‘-t".1. f. i 1:10„er / ■ 21 rolO40/ • jo 7,.„,/,,, d ir,;(0. -, 1, E. ..„ n , , -.1. ..., ,.„ 0, L-:::, 7- •••• 1 .1 44 z ZA74 igi .1 // ,-V / is. A SA A Agt IR:'' ppor''''' v,-,---triPORy 04,.04 kar -,,rpl:ppi VIT._' 5,1 4/ /0/ 1 44.0ptiii, / / 00/ fir roloil: ly i. _,_, --Lk itiii \ LT co .'_- '• i, I 95 / i0,,01, •/,30fi fl,,, / , /rAt p,I ° Atlitil ?. laFt YAiti. 70412 1-'■-1 -.IA . A Aff,Pgr., 7 44,10pie. / / / e , fark1201: _ .,,r4mi - -- Afrifg /6 ---24.4A ! jr---------t---7-1,2, 1- i -,-, i - - r r -743/4 "0•4° Vie"; e isrAI 1 iwri—.: -. —71 P , q• I -2-.....,:sEzt2t 2,: i 104 of - frir.01,4,0 //2 Afil 44 dal /Airtii' vO.u, ; .!.-c;:1-,,,,;i1.• is AO / $ to of ht ) ..' i • 1' - a A , -■tt - --- - - • ',,_,•._,V 4 P''..raiX-csr / 2------k-- i . 1_.=7_:..____ ---.„„_., 2,,_-_, rr_'d '_, ,_,,___.c_......:___,--t-,--17`75.- -as/,'‘., - .-.--.,,t,- --. . ;„_-: -=::-:-L----.7-_---4.---------^-----_-_, -- .:.,. -,.. : -,--- -sr-,-;------t7---,.: _:-. I - I'4? - -,_ '!I rtrktr't"-- 1 • I '-, ' t• ' :1 11I1 , / •. 1: , i i , I. 1 • 1 :-.1 1' -- i rI ■ I ,,:1 11 1 I- t 1 I , I a - I . ---, ri z. '•-4 <4 ,:, m= • ai 4111 Aa Mt G,H, I ,&J- 55 • • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • • 8:00 p.m. Torn Grahn August 16, 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18819 - WATER MILL HOMES - The proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: Development Review DRC2011-00629, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629 - WATER MILL HOMES - The design review of 16 homes associated with the development of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18819, the proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres of land into 17 lots in the Very•Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: SUBTT18819, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. • Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing the development of a 17-lot subdivision located in the 10.6-acre area surrounded by Etiwanda Avenue to the east, Victoria Street to the north, Grape Place to •the west, and existing single-family homes to the south. There is an existing single-family house located on the project site; the George and Jessie Johnston home, located in the extreme southeast corner of the project site is proposed to be relocated to one of the lots within the proposed subdivision (Lot 17). Vegetation on the site consists of several mature trees and numerous grave vines. Lots within the proposed subdivision are placed in a north to south configuration, with 6 lots (Lots 1 thru 6) fronting onto Victoria Street, 10 lots (Lots 7 thru 16) fronting on to an east-west cul-de-sac, and 1 lot (Lot 17) oriented towards Etiwanda Avenue. Of the 16 lots, 7 are single-story 3,800 square foot homes, and 9 are two-story 4,150 square foot homes. The proposed design is a contemporary representation of Traditional, Spanish, and Bungalow architectural styles. Staff Comments: Major Issues: The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this • project: 1. The design of the single-story building elevations provides for a substantial use of architectural elements to enhance the buildings design. However, on the two-story elevations the use of these materials is limited, appears to be focused at the center mass of the front elevation, and should be significantly expanded based on the following: Bungalow — Expand the use of wood siding where appropriate on the front and side elevations. Utilize stone accent materials at the garage and chimney elements. • a. Traditional — Expand the use of the brick accent material on other portions of the front and side elevations at the chimney. EXHIBIT B G,H, I ,&J- 56 DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18819 AND DRC2011-00629 • August 16, 2011 Page 2 b. Traditional (2CX) — Significantly expand the use of the brick accent material to include areas near the front door and on all sides of the garage. c. Spanish — Recess various windows to provide depth to the building plane, additional shadow accents, and elements traditionally utilized in Spanish architecture. 2. Expand architectural styles to include the use of a native field stone. The native field stone is prevalent in the Etiwanda area, was traditionally used as an architectural element in the construction of homes in the area, and is encouraged in the development of new homes. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Associated with the proposed development of this tract, is the relocation of the Johnston home located in the extreme southeast corner of the project site. Existing improvements include the home, detached office, barn, and miscellaneous structures. The applicant is proposing the relocation of the home and detached office building to Lot 17, which fronts onto Etiwanda Avenue, also in the extreme southeast portion of this tract. The applicant is proposing the relocation of these structures, installing foundation improvements and completing finish lot improvements, which could include finished grade, gas, electrical, telephone, and water connections, and preservation of • the existing cedar tree. All other improvements, including landscaping, parking, structural, etc, will be completed by the City. An associated Development Agreement will be presented to the City Council for the acquisition and acceptance of this lot and structure. • • Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Provide solid masonry return walls between the units, not wrought iron fencing. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed project and forward to the Planning Commission for their consideration. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee members reviewed the project and requested that the applicant address the following issues: • The Committee reviewed the single-story elevations and did not recommend any design changes. • The Committee reviewed the two-story elevations and recommended the following design modifications: 1. Traditional — Expand the use of brick siding to enhance the entrance and additional portions of the front elevation. • G,H, I ,&J- 57 • DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18819 AND DRC2011-00629 •August 16, 2011 Page 3 2. Bungalow— Incorporate the use of field stone on the front and side elevations. 3. Spanish — Provided architectural elements at various windows to provide depth to the building plane, additional shadow accents, and elements traditionally utilized in Spanish architecture. Revise the garage door style for consistency with the architectural theme. • The Committee recommended the installation of 6-foot high solid masonry walls along the local equestrian trail. The Committee requested that the applicant work with staff on the design issues and return to the Design Review Committee at a later date. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner Tom Grahn • • • • • • • • • G,H, I ,&J- 58 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Tom Grahn October 4, 2011 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18819 - WATER MILL HOMES - The proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related Files: Development Review DRC2011-00629, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. The applicant revised the project architecture based on previous Committee direction. Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of the application. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed the revised Site Plan and elevations and recommended approval. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner Tom Grahn • • G,H, I ,&J- 59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY Ala • COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 10, 2011, @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ACTION I. ROLL CALL: X Frances Howdyshell X Janet Ryerson X Lou Munoz Kelly Matheny (Alternate) Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) A Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) X Larry Henderson X Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member) X Bill Pallotto II. NEW BUSINESS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819- WATER MILL HOMES-The proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots in the Very-Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria • Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17,20,and 21. Related files: Development Review DRC2011-00629, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629-WATER MILL HOMES - The design review of 16 homes associated with the development of Tentative Tract 18819, the proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: SUBTT18819, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. ACTION: 1. The majority (4-2) of the Committee Members present recommended that the combo wall (combination block and decorative metal) alternative presented by the applicant's representative was preferable to the standard solid block wall or PVC Trail fencing. The final wall combo design will be pool safe standard under the Building Code. 2. Vehicular gate step thru details presented by the Applicant were acceptable to all TAC Members. 3. Applicant will adjust the Trail intersections to meet the radius configuration of the Fire District Standard as a guide for horse maintenance associated vehicles. III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION • There were no public comments. V. ADJOURNMENT 6:31 p.m. . EXHIBIT C G,H, I ,&J- 60 .Print Form 'I ' ,Ag.i, ENVIRONMENTAL •• yh N� INFORMATION FORM V i � , S6 'IF i I (Part I - Initial Study) • City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the.City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to,traffic, noise, biological,drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete • unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the • applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, Officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. • GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: • Project Title: Etiwanda Estates Name&Address of project owner(s): APN's 1089-081-16,-17,-20, and -21 Jamie Lapointe and Tracy Finney ANP 1089-081-16 Charles V. Cummings and Dorothy Z. Cummings • • Name&Address of developer or project sponsor Water Mill Homes r: 20151 SW Birch St. Ste. 150 Newport Beach, CA 92660 • • Contact Person&A re.c.c Craig Kozma -Same address as above' I:\PLANT Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT D G,H, I ,&J- 61 Name &Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Craig Kozma • Telephone Number: (949) 250-4200 PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk()is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff *1; Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2; Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east,and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): 10.6 Acres -SW Corner of Etiwanda Ave. and Victoria Ave. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 1089-081-16, 1089-081-17, 1089-081-20 • 1089-081-21, 1089-081-16 *5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 10.6 *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 9.2 dedications): 7 Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): • N/A • 8. Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental • I:\PLANNING\FINALIFORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1.doc Page 2 of 10 G,H, I ,&J- 62 agencies in order to fully implement the project: • Approval of Tentative Tract Map and Development Design Review 9 Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals,mature trees,trails and roads,drainage courses,and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures.,Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information Re.,geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys,traffic studies): The site currently consists of 1 single family home (Johnstone Home), accessory structures including a small office building, barn, and detached garages. The remainder of the site consists of vineyards and vacant land. • See attached for geologic and preliminary hydrology reports. • • • 10, Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports . and oral history): The Johnston Home and detached office structure have been designated as potentially historic. As part of the development, the Johnston Home and detached office structure are proposed to be relocated • to a new lot fronting Etiwanda Ave. (Lot 17)and dedicated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERunitial Study Partt.doc Page 3 of 10 G,H, I ,&J- 63 11 Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect • proposed uses: None • 12 Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: Tract 18819 proposes 17 new residential lots with a minimum lot size of 20,000sf. The proposed development consists of 16 new single family homes and 1 lot(Lot 17) designated for the relocation and dedication to the City of Rancho Cucamonga of the Johnston home and detached office structure. • • • 13 Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops,department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height,frontage, setback,rear yard, etc.): East: Etiwanda Intermediate School North, West, South -Single Family Residential 14 Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? • No • • 1:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 4 of 10 G,H, I ,&J- 64 15 Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? • A screen walls and equestrian trails where indicated. • 16, Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: Removal of vineyard and trees surrounding the Johnston home. 17, Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: N/a -See hydrology • 18 Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification:please • • contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. 11,985 a. Residential(gal/day) Peak use(gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use(gal/min/ac) 19 Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank Ti Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage systemis proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20, Number of residential units: 17 • Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes,minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Lot sizes range from 20,181sf(minimum)to 29,099 (maximum) • • • Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): • • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part!.doc Page 5 of 10 • G,H, I ,&J 65 • 21_ Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $500,000 to $700,000 • Rent(per month) $ to $ •22, Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 4-5 Bedrooms per house 23, Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24 Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: - c. Senior High - • COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS • 25, Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial,industrial or institutional uses: 26, Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: • • • 27, Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: Total: • Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERIInitial Study Paril.doc Page 6 of 10 • • • • G,H, I ,&J- 66 28 Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate o hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): • 30, Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: • *31, For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should bE verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818) 572-6283): • ALL PROJECTS 33 Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to providE adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. • Preliminary Review 33 In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials: Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include,but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides an herbicides;fuels,oils,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, i known. • See Phase I Environmental • • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Patti.doc Page 7 of 10 • G,H, I ,&J- 67 34, Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used ant proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown ant • labeled on the application plans. No 35 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional informatio may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: � r( . Signature: /filt Title: er 4k.\ '0004Q.5 • • • • 1:1PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTER1lnitial Study Partl.doc Page 8 of 10 G,H, I ,&J- 68 ATTACHMENT "A" • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) • General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows • Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day ' • Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 • • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1.doc Page 9 of 10 G,H, I ,&J- 69 • ATTACHMENT B • Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: • Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • (909)987-8942 • Etiwanda 6061'East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 • High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 • • • • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Panl.doc Page 10 of 10 G,H, I ,&J- 70 aisi]kN,�l kl `' �"' City of Rancho Cucamonga • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Poo ttA INITIAL STUDY PART II 'etc' tem BACKGROUND 1. Project File: SUBTT18819, DRC2011-00629 (Design Review), DRC2011-00383 (Variance), and DRC2011-00638 (Tree Removal Permit). 2. Related File: JOHNSTON HOUSE RELOCATION— DRC2011-01121 —WATER MILL HOMES— 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18819 — WATER MILL HOMES — The proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: Development Review DRC2011-00629, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629 — WATER MILL HOMES — The design review of 16 homes associated with the development of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18819, the proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres of land into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: SUBTT18819, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. • VARIANCE DRC2011-00383 — WATER MILL HOMES — A request to reduce the minimum average lot size and the minimum lot dept requirement for 1 lot associated with the proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081- 16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: SUBTT18819, Development Review DRC2011-00629, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2011-00638—WATER MILL HOMES —A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Related files: SUBTT18819, Development Review DRC2011-00629, and Variance DRC2011-00383. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Water Mill Homes 20151 SW Birch Street, Suite 150 Newport Beach, CA 92660 5. General Plan Designation: Very Low 6. Zoning: Very Low Residential District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The applicant is proposing the development of a 17-lot subdivision located in the 10.6-acre area surrounded by Etiwanda Avenue to the east, Victoria Street to the north, Grape Place to the west, and existing single-family homes to the south. There • is an existing single-family house located on the project site; the George and Jessie Johnston home, located in the extreme southeast comer of the project site is proposed to be relocated to G,H, I ,&J- 71 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 2 one of the lots within the proposed subdivision (Lot 17). Vegetation on the site consists of several • mature trees and numerous grape vines. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tom Grahn (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report • FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG —Reactive Organic Gases PMio— Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB— Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD— South Coast Air Quality Management District • SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G—Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (1)Aesthetics (V)Agricultural Resources (V)Air Quality (✓) Biological Resources (1) Cultural Resources (✓) Geology &Soils (✓) Greenhouse Gas Emissions ( ) Hazards &Waste Materials (✓) Hydrology&Water Quality ( ) Land Use & Planning ( ) Mineral Resources • (✓) Noise ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( )Transportation/Traffic ( ) Utilities & Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance • • Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 72 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 3 • DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (V) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be - 'gnificant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agree• the pr..-c pro.onent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Prepared By: A .. .s Date: lit 141 Anforrn Reviewed By: I �� Date: kI (/J0 • • • Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 73 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 4 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: a°(°"fiany WW1 Than Significant oron Significant No Impact Intoroorporate° Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (• ) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho • Cucamonga. c) The site is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street and is characterized by existing residential development to the north, south, and west, and Etiwanda Intermediate School to the east. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project because the surrounding development is predominantly residential, and development of this project site will utilize the same design review process and high quality residential development standards in the development of this project site. This project was reviewed by Planning Department staff and the Design Review Committee and is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines. In addition, City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning •Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. • • • Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 74 • Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 5 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than . Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Inman Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (V) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? • c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoing of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (1 ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or • conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: - a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street and is characterized by existing residential development to the north, south, and west, and Etiwanda Intermediate School to the east. The project area consists • of 10.6 acres developed with a vineyard, an abandoned residence, six accessory buildings, and a few concrete slabs; however, this vineyard is not identified as a Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to General Plan Table RC-2. Concentrations of Important • Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan (FPEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the ' General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no • Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 75 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 6 • Less Than - • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street and is characterized by existing residential development to the north, south, and west, and Etiwanda Intermediate School to the east. The project site consists of 10.6 acres • developed with a vineyard, an abandoned residence, and various accessory buildings. The vineyard occupies greater than 50 percent of the project site, and although it was associated with the local viticulture industry, it is not an actively farmed site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land and there is no potential for the conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. • 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: ' a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) applicable air quality plan? • b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) ( ( ) • substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? • c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing .emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) . concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse • particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM1p), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and Rev. 9/2011 76 • Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 7 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wun man Significant Mitigation Significant Imoect Incorporated Imp act Impa tl particulate matter (PM10 and PM2,5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), vinyl chloride, and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. • Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM1o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2,5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide(SO2), and lead. • Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria • include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Assessment study was prepared by KPC Environmental, Inc., in July 2011 that utilizes the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS 2007 Version 9.2.4) methodology. and CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993 to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Green House Gas Emissions. • Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 77 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 8 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Short Term (Construction) Impacts Pollutant(Ibs/day)- , Source h-• .� �;yOC NOx CO .,_ *�PM10'; SOx. r' • PM2 5 >: Demolition 1.73 16.37 7.81 8.15 0.01 2.24 Mass Grading 4.05 32.45 18.68 56.00 0.00 12.91 Fine Grading 3.95 31.68 18.04 55.25 0.00 12.74 Trenching/ Foundation 2.78 21.25 12.15 1.24 0.00 1.14 Building Construction 3.19 19.13 13.81 1.23 0.00 1.14 Architectural 9.84 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coatings Paving Emissions 4.47 23.09 29.22 3.12 0.01 2.83 SCAQMD Significance 75.00 100.00 550.00 150.00 150.00 55.00 Threshold Significant No No No No. No No Impact? Note: The maximum daily emissions refer to the maximum emissions that would occur in one day; it was assumed that the grading activities do not occur at the same time as the other construction activities; • therefore,their emissions are not summed. VOC=Volatile Organic Compounds,NO2=Nitrogen Dioxide,CO = Carbon Monoxide, SO2 = Sulfur Dioxide, PMra = Course particulate matter, and PMis = Fine particulate matter. Source:URBEMIS output,Appendix A. Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions typically associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. There will be 16 residential buildings proposed for the project. Based on the • proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed buildings will result in approximately 3.19 pounds of VOC per day during the coating phase. The emissions would occur after grading activities, near the end of the construction period. Therefore, this VOC emission Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 78 I - • Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 9 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pmemial With man Significannt t Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 pounds per day. Emissions associated with architectural coatings could be reduced by using pre- coated/natural-colored building materials, using water-based or low-VOC coating, and using coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency. For example, High-Velocity Low-Pressure (HVLP) applicator spray method is a coating application system operated at air pressure between 0.1 and 10 pounds per square inch gauge (psig), with 65 percent transfer efficiency. The majority of architectural coatings will be applied as interior paints which would offer the best reduction using Low VOC and No , • VOC paints. Manual applications such as paintbrush, and roller trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge have 100 percent transfer efficiency. Construction of the project would use . an HVLP spray method to apply coatings to increase the transfer efficiency and reduce the daily VOC emissions to 9.84 pounds over that architectural coatings application period. Odors • Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, • the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, • and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. • Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions — Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) on a project- specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following • mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 79 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 10 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially won pan Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact mead 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. • Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to • reduce Particulate Matter (PM1g)emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 80 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 11 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant corporate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Imoacl 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM1g emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (No2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2,5 and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Lonq Term (Operational) Impacts Lonq Term Project Operational Emissions • Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase of the number of residential buildings in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings. Based on trip generation factors included in the Air Quality Assessment prepared by KPC Environmental, Inc, in July 2011, long-term operation emissions associated with the proposed project, calculated with the URBEMIS 2007 shows that the increase of all criteria pollutants as a result of the proposed project would be less than the corresponding SCAQMD daily emission thresholds. Therefore, project-related long-term air quality impacts would not be significant. Mitigation measures would not be required. Sonrc " xn r - ✓ raw "�Y l!Ei41' 9-11utant zs., .444 n i - S VOC NOx CO PM10 SOx PM25C• 3 Y.,.x ._� "�',?x.rF.'.>u,� :� x� .�x. .e•v�,. S�^ .x r Unmitigated 2.44 1.89 15.53 3.03 0.02 0.59 (lbs/day) SCAQMD Significance 55.00 55.00 550.00 150.00 150.00 55.00 Threshold Significant No No No No No No Impact? 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (long term) Lonq Term (Operational) Emissions — The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR)analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of • the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 81 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 12 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially gat man Significant corporiate Significant Impact Impact Incorporated Impact pa • significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 10) Landscape with native andlor drought-resistant species to reduce water • consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 12) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low- polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.3). c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and • State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4.mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is immediately adjacent to a sensitive receptor (i.e., existing residences and a school). Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2,5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and • would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would be like cooking and gardening. Similarly common odors associated with mixed-use and commercial land uses would be expected Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 82 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 13 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated , impact Impact 0.e. restaurants). Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish • and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the • Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal ,pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? • d) Interfere substantially with the movem f any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) resident or migratory fish or wildlife s ies or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with single-family residences and a school use. The site has been previously disrupted during the construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments and annual disking for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. • b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. • Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 83 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 14 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) • The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project site contains numerous Eucalyptus, fruit, and palm trees that are proposed for removal; therefore, the proposed project is in conflict with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. The applicant submitted Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638 for the removal of 63 heritage trees, including Eucalyptus, California Pepper, California Fan Palm, Canary Island Date Palm, and Italian Stone Pine trees and the preservation of 1 tree, a Deodar Cedar. The Deodar Cedar is located in the southeast portion of the project site adjacent to the Johnston House. All trees proposed for removal are in conflict with proposed grading, home construction, and/or the construction of Community and Local Feeder trails. To mitigate the impact of the removal of the trees, the applicant shall comply with the following mitigation measures: 1) Heritage trees that are removed shall be replaced on a three-to-one basis with a similar species of a minimum 15-gallon size. 2) Tree planting, when feasible, shall follow the requirements established in the • Etiwanda Specific Plan regarding windrow replacement. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. • No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. • • • 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). Because the project site contains the Johnston House, a locally designated Point of Interest, and also includes • the former site of the Frost General Store, the applicant had LSA Associates prepare a Cultural Resources Assessment in September 2011. Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 84 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 15 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wih Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incomorated Impact Impact Johnston House — The Johnston House is located- in the southeastern portion of the proposed subdivision, within the limits of proposed lots 15 and 16. Existing buildings and improvements include 1 residence, 6 accessory buildings, various concrete features, and a vineyard. The Cultural Resources Assessment evaluated the Johnston House for significance using both the California Register (4 required criteria needed for designation) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (5 criteria needed for local designation). Based on this criteria analysis, the Cultural Resources Assessment determined that the property does not meet the criteria for listing in the California Register or for local designation as a Historic Landmark primarily due to a lack of integrity. It also does not meet the criteria for designation as a local Historic District or Conservation District. Therefore, it is not a historical resource as defined by CEQA. However, the Johnston House is already designated as a Point of Interest and, based on this evaluation it continues to merit that designation, as well as special consideration in local planning. Although the Cultural Resources Assessment determined that the Johnston House does not meet the City of Rancho Cucamonga criteria for local designation as a Historic Landmark, Planning staff does not agree with this conclusion. Under the City of Rancho Cucamonga Criteria 1, the property is associated with events that made a significant contribution td the broad patterns of local history, specifically, George F. Johnston's relationship to the local table grape industry. Therefore, it follows that the property has • integrity and warrants designation. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will pursue designation as a local Historic Landmark. The applicant is proposing the relocation of the Johnston House and the adjacent office accessory" building through the related application DRC2011-01121. These buildings will be relocated to Lot 17, which is situated at the southeast corner of the proposed subdivision, adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue. The Johnston House will be relocated, modern additions will be demolished, and the house and office will be placed on a permanent foundation. Additionally, the applicant will re-roof both structures and provide a finished lot and all utility connections. The City will acquire Lot 17 and the relocated Johnston House and will begin restoration and preservation, when funding is available. Frost General Store — The Frost General Store was previously located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street, within the limits of proposed Lot 6. The site of the former Frost General Store was evaluated for significance. The Frost General Store was destroyed by fire in 1966 and the site has been utilized for agricultural purposes since that time. Although trace concrete rubble and metal fragments were observed, no historic-period features, artifacts, or refuse was identified on-site. No other archaeological resources were identified within the project boundaries. The Cultural Resources Assessment identifies that due to the presence and documented former presence of buildings dating to the late 19th and early 20th centuries within the project area, sensitivity for historic-period subsurface resources in the vicinity of the Johnston House and the former site of the Frost General Store is high and monitoring by a qualified archaeologist is recommended. If previously undocumented cultural resources are identified during earthmoving activities, the nature and significance of the find shall be • assessed, construction excavation will be diverted if necessary, and a treatment plan formulated and implemented. Rev. 9/2011 • G,H, I ,&J- 85 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 16 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Nth Than SipNficenl MiNth Significant No 'nutlet Incorporated 'moan Intact 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. 2) Due to the presence of the Johnston House and the former Frost General Store, the project site shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist during demolition and grading activities. 3) Following brush/tree stump removal and slab/footing removal (following the demolition of standing structures of the extant buildings/decks/platforms) any grading within 100 feet of the Johnston House (and adjacent buildings) and the former location of the Frost General Store shall be conducted with controlled grading, in no more than 6-inch increments, to allow the archaeologist to accurately observe and monitor grading activities. 4) If previously undocumented cultural resources are identified during earthmoving activities, the nature and significance of the find shall be assessed, construction excavation will be diverted if necessary, and a treatment plan formulated and implemented. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; • however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 5) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the • inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 86 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 17 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With nan Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: • 6) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation • measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where • mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor • of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments, annual disking for weed abatement, and an active vineyard. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and • disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 87 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 18 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially w"^ ^°^ Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) Hi) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (7) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site • landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () ( ) () (✓) • 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 1.5 miles north-west of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 2.5 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 12 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 14 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils, The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to • strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing • sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 88 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 19 • Less Than Signifirani Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially carp Than PP 9 Significant oion Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impapl • control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM1g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM1g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,g emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or • more to reduce PM1g emissions. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside • areas at the northern end of the City and in the 501 for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside.Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an • Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand (TuB) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand (TuB) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of • greenhouse gases? () O O (/) Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 89 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 20 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im°acl Comments: • a) Regulations and Significance —The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (ED) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that will be the first step to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs, which include: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), hydroflourocarbons (HFCs), perflourocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and • engines contribute to GHG pollution. • The western States, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit (°F)over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead • agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other • solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The • stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PM,6, PM2.5, and SO2 Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 90 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 21 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wun Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Inroad 'Incorporated Impact Impact which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM16, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. • Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality Assessment prepared by KPC Environmental, Inc, in July 2011 the project would result in the following emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) and would not result in the other GHG's - (perfourocarbons (PFCs) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) and would not result in the other GHG's. As seen in the tables below the proposed project would result in a total • of 192.17 MTCO2eq/yr from construction activities and 89.76 MTCO2eq/yr for area sources and 237.24 MTCO2eq/yr for mobile sources. Total project related direct operation emission would result in 429.41 MTCO2eq/yr. Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions — The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel- powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading, and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as • CO2, Cho, and N2O. CI-14 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. "r , t Emissions " Emissionsa k Source � A ' 'bon . ) (tons.of carbon dioxide)^: .`.(MT-002eT . Demolition 5.37 5.94 Mass Grading 15.67 22.39 Fine Grading 7.91 11.46 Trenching 5.64 9.67 Paving 7.03 6.43 Building Construction 196.67 128.32 Architectural Coating 0.63 7.96 Total 238.92 192.17 Average (30 years) 8 6.4 • • Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 91 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 22 • Sign Than • Significant With Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wun Tnan SiImpactnt corporate SiImpact t Impact 'Incorporated Imaad Impact • Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. • 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. • 7) To conserve water and to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan, the following measures shall be implemented: a) The installation of recycled water irrigation systems, i.e. dual distribution systems, is required to allow for future use of recycled water. b) Low flow appliances, i.e. toilets, dishwashers, showerheads, washing machines, etc. shall be installed if provided by the builder. c) A minimum of 50 percent of the landscape palette shall contain drought- resistant species. d) Turf (grass) shall not be used as a landscape feature in the common/public/shared areas; however, turf is allowed in the activity areas(s) in community parks (if any). • e) The quantity of grass/turf shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the landscaped portion in the front yards. There shall be no minimum amount of grass/turf imposed anywhere on the site. 8) The project shall incorporate enough points to be certified in Build-it-Green (builditgreen.org) or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). However, the project does not need to be officially `certified' to reduce cost • associated with the certification. • Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 92 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than SigN6cant Mtigatwn Significant No Impact Incomorated Impact Impact • 9) The project shall incorporate the following measures to reduce energy use: a) Plant shade trees within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet of the west sides of properties. b) All units shall be constructed to be able to easily convert to solar power, i.e. solar ready. c) Photovoltaic cells (solar panels), tankless water heaters, and solar powered water heaters shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option, or installed. d) Each appliance, i.e. washers, dryers refrigerators, stoves, etc. provided by the builder must be Energy Star qualified if an Energy Star designation is applicable for that appliance. 10) The following measures shall be included in the site plan to reduce.motor vehicle emissions and to be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan: • a) There shall be pedestrian sidewalks on both sides of the streets in the project site. b) The project shall install a Class I Bike Path on the western portion of Etiwanda Avenue adjacent to the project site. c) The project shall contain pedestrian connections to the uses adjacent to the project site. Lonq Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. • • • Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 93 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 24 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Maigara Significant No Impact Incorporated d Impact Impact Source • .Emissionsl(MTCO2e) - • Motor Vehicles 237.24 Natural Gas 36.99 Electricity 35.82 Water Transport 7.47 Waste 9.14 Subtotal —Operations Total 327 Subtotal —Construction Total (Average 30 years) 11 Total (Operations + Construction) 429.41 The project involves the subdivision of 17 lots and the construction of 16 residential units and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including fiber optic communications infrastructure, on-street bike lanes, sidewalks, and water efficient landscaping. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team which proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in • the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The developer of the proposed project will be required to provide fiber optic communications infrastructure, on-street bike lanes, sidewalks, fire defensible space, and water efficient landscaping. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with • SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. The project's long term operation emissions will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAQMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; a) Increased insulation, b) Limit air leakage through the structure, c) Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, d) Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and • landscaping, e) Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 94 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 25 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Than Mitigation Significant No Imoacl Incoroorated Imoact Imoact • f) Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, g) Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the . project and include the following; a) Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. b) Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. c) Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets, and waterless urinals/water heaters. d) Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. • 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 5) To conserve water and to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan,the following measures shall be implemented: a) The installation of recycled water irrigation systems, i.e. dual distribution systems, is required to allow for future use of recycled water. b) Low flow appliances, i.e. toilets, dishwashers, showerheads, washing machines, etc. shall be installed if provided by the builder. c) A minimum of 50 percent of the landscape palette shall contain drought- resistant species. d) Turf (grass) shall not be used as a landscape feature in the common/public/shared areas; however, turf is allowed in the activity areas(s) in community parks(if any). e) The quantity of grass/turf shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the landscaped portion in the front yards. There shall be no minimum amount of grass/turf imposed anywhere on the site. 6) The project shall incorporate enough points to be certified in Build-it-Green (builditgreen.org) or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). • However, the project does not need to be officially `certified' to reduce cost associated with the certification. Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 95 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 26 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact InC0l00rated Impact Impact 7) The project shall incorporate the following measures to reduce energy use: a) Plant shade trees within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet of the west sides of properties. b) All units shall be constructed to be able to easily convert to solar power, i.e. solar ready. c) Photovoltaic cells (solar panels), tankless water heaters, and solar powered water heaters shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option, or installed. d) Each appliance, i.e. washers, dryers refrigerators, stoves, etc. provided by the builder must be Energy Star qualified if an Energy Star designation is applicable for that appliance. 8) The following measures shall be included in the site plan to reduce motor vehicle emissions and to be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan: a) There shall be pedestrian sidewalks on both sides of the streets in the project site. • b) The project shall install a Class I Bike Path on the western portion of Etiwanda Avenue adjacent to the project site. c) The project shall contain pedestrian connections to the uses adjacent to the project site. `Source . ' _:'• Emisstons`(MTCOZe per .. >r x:r. ? , .Unmitigated %„ (.Reduction ., sal-tc-ki,Mitibated:112g Motor Vehicles 237 5% (12) 225 Natural Gas 37 5%(2) 35 Electricity 36 10% (4) 32 Water Transport 7 5% (.35) 6.65 Waste 9 0 9 Subtotal- 326 18.35 307.65 Operations Total Subtotal- Construction Total 11 0 10 (Average 30 years) Total (Operations + 429.41 18.35 411.06 Construction) SCAQMD Draft Threshold 3,500 - 3,500 Significant Impact No - I No • • Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 96 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 27 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Orient Imamarated Imoad Paned b) The project proposes the subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots and the construction of 16 single-family residences. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximize divers opportunities. The developer of the proposed project will be required to provide fiber optic communications infrastructure, on-street bike lanes, sidewalks, and water efficient landscaping and therefore is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: • a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? • c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) 'Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) • adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? • Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 97 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 28 Less Than' • Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Si No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss,•injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through • construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the • State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) Etiwanda Intermediate School is located directly adjacent to the project site on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, and Grapeland Elementary School is located approximately '/ mile to the south. The project will be required to comply with existing State and Federal standards on the use and transport of hazardous materials. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and • evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 98 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 29 • Less Than Significant Lass Th Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pmemianr With an Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1 . 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) ( ) (V) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? • c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional • sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or. . Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard . delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? • j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 99 • Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 30 Less roan • • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger'must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: . • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other • waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required,to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Thielmann Engineers, April 9, 2011, and May 24, 2011, which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the • Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that Rev. 9/2011 , G,H, I ,&J- 100 • Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 31 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wati an pp 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. • 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by Thielmann Engineers, April 9, 2011 and May 24, 2011, to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • Post- Construction Operational: 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan, prepared by Thielmann Engineers, April 9, 2011 and May 24, 2011, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticideslherbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for . a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and • • approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but • would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470.feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 101 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 32 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with nan Significant Mitigation Significant No Invest Inconcoratea Impact Impact CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows, A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and • amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial • additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by Thielmann Engineers, April 9, 2011 and May 24, 2011, to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under • the NPDES General Construction Permit. Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 102 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 33 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With man Significant incorporated Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact g) The project site is not located within a. 100-year flood hazard area according to General . Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of rion-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. • 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning • ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street and is characterized by existing residential development to the north, south, and west, and Etiwanda Intermediate School to the east. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north, south, and west. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Very Low Residential. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is for 17 lots which will be developed with single-family residences. The development of the site will be consistent with the land use designations as described in • the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the General Plan. The project density, subdivision layout, and the individual lot sizes and dimensions are consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the General Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 103 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 34 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Nltth Than Sit Mitigation Significant No Imoact Impact Incoloofateci Impact Impact c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local • general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2, and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2, and Table RC-1, as a • valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. • 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? • . Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 104 • Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 35 • • Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No mp ad t Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. The project is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street and both streets are at same grade as the proposed subdivision. Mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels. Exterior: 1) The exterior unmitigated noise levels are about 62.8 CNEL, so exterior mitigation measures will not be needed. Interior: 1) All exterior building surfaces in the project will be exposed to noise levels of less than 65 CNEL, and therefore will require less than 20.0 dB exterior to interior noise reduction in order to meet the City's 45 CNEL interior noise standard. All rooms are projected to meet the City's 45 CNEL interior noise standard without building upgrades. 2) All buildings exposed to noise levels greater than 57 CNEL will meet the 45 • CNEL interior noise level criteria only with windows closed. Adequate ventilation with windows closed must be provided per the applicable California Building Code. b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. There may be short term construction related vibration. However, the applicant will be required to follow all City requirements regarding construction activities. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 — Transportation/Traffic and therefore will not likely increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. • d) The General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles,_and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as • specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 105 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 36 Less Tnan • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially an Significant Mitigatgat ion Significant Nlo Impart Incorporated Impact Impact Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. • The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 1) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public • airport. The Project is located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will include the construction of 16 single-family homes. Although the project will increase the population growth in the area there will be a less than significant impact as the project is consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation which density and was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Construction activities at the site will • be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. No impacts are anticipated. Rev, 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 106 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 37 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The project site is underutilized and has 1 residential unit which will be relocated within the project boundaries and restored. There will be no temporary displacement of households or residents during construction of new residential units because the existing structure is vacant and non-habitable. No adverse impact is expected. c) The project site is underutilized and has 1 residential unit which will be relocated within the project boundaries and restored. There will be no temporary displacement of households or residents during construction of new residential units because the existing structure is vacant and non-habitable. No adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? O ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) c) Schools? O O O (✓) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The site, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street would be served by a fire station located approximately 3 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. • b) The increase in residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and • will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. • d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The • nearest park, Windrows Park is located approximately '/ mile west of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 107 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 38 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant igation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? • b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect • on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Windrows Park is located approximately 'A mile west of the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. • 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: • a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? • b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) program, including, but not limited to a level of Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 108 • Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 39 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Issues and Supporting Information Sources: an Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 208 vehicle trips daily. The • proposed project includes the development of 16 residences. The Rancho Cucamonga • Traffic Model estimates that each residence will generate 13 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. • b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each residence will generate 1.75 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No • impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 109 • Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 40 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wnp Than Significant Mitigation Significant No _ Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) The site is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street and is generally characterized by residential development to the north, south, and west, and Etiwanda Intermediate School to the east. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature, No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project is residential. Although houses are not part of the proposal, when the houses are submitted for review, adequate parking, specifically an enclosed garage and a driveway, in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code will be required. No impacts are anticipated. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) • (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 • capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 110 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 41 • Less Tnen Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Si gaol No Im Impact Incorporated Impact Impact wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho • Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. • f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) ( () quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection • with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future • projects)? Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 111 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 42 • Less Than • Stgnificant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Imact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. No impacts are anticipated. There are heritage trees, including numerous Eucalyptus, fruit, and palm trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is in conflict with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to preserve the Deodar Cedar, located in the south east portion of the project site adjacent to the Johnston House. However, there are some trees that will be required to be removed to allow grading, the construction of homes, and/or the construction of Community and Local Feeder trails. The applicant has submitted an application to remove these trees — Related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop • the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES • Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 112 • Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 43 • 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available fdr review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive(check all that apply): • (✓) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (1) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (✓) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (✓) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) (V) Air Quality Assessment KPC Environmental, Inc., July 2011 Email updates, November 3, 2011 (✓) Noise Analysis for Etiwanda Tentative Tract 18819 Mestre Greve Associates, July 25, 2011 • (✓) Cultural Resources Assessment • LSA Associates, September 2011 (✓) Preliminary Arboriculture Report Knapp Associates, June 6, 2011 • (✓) Water Quality Management Plan Thielmann Engineers, April 9, 2011 and May 24,2011 ( ) Other: • • Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 113 Initial Study for SUBTT18819 City of Rancho Cucamonga WATER MILL HOMES Page 44 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION • I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly o significa environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: Date: // 30 /I Print Name and Title: C ZA MA — "Pro ce %Ag ayV c:\n rportbl\rwgi m an l\sflower\1381468 1.doc c:\nrportbl\rwgimanl\sflower\1381468_1.doc • • • • Rev. 9/2011 G,H, I ,&J- 114 04 City of Rancho Cucamonga � � MITIGATION MONITORING kt"l PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTT18819 (Tentative Tract Map), DRC2011-00629 (Design Review), DRC2011- 00383(Variance), DRC2011-00638(Tree Removal Permit), and DRC2011-01121 (Johnston House Relocation). This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impadt mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management-The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project.The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation)that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in • performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 G,H, I ,&J- 115 Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTT18819, DRC2011-00629, DRC2011-00383, DRC2011-00638, and DRC2011-01121 Page 2 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date,the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business • license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions(mitigation)that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee)with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • G,H, I ,&J- 116 4 -7 En Ex-41 c E u-"a=r1 0 o 0 ..zr •:t cr) Z in is,- CV rN.1 IN tE-j TO el'47'-: rs- Vicji ._ -•-• -.? ci) ru eb I- = rx —1 — ct =-1 ,- ,... . . 2 c■I o 2 n 0 0 0 = 0 LLI 1- 0 a, , (-) .: 2 0 1 2 > :,-..: Z L---r-/ Z •r-t- Z F- E -----ii 0 co co • w kr-1 C 0 C C C -I > 0 . co r a roc , co -6 co -a. co f). < '; z ID vra.--.=-4 'IS - - :-: "a 'a "6 '6 i5 P cti 15 ca 0 3 3 3 3 -- 0 a) c = a a) 0 a) Z = .0; 5 5 5 5 0- ... E :i kg- It a) a) a) ..... 1 (5 iZ > ifte CC It CC CC m I-• CO Zi 'I- -0 w- 1 :- = -- , '8 U 2- tr al o 2 a • Ill 2 u. 1 0 0 0 co 0 r I cial C.) O c c a, c &I'' Z M flit. 0 0 u) a m 0 0 0 ■., N 13 ma) 16 .e. Oct 0- 0. m co Z "3 0 O ag (c) ,-crESi -0 - - -0 cu a) >,-o o c u) c >-. >. -o c.,,5 6- ci) 0 T-6 • (11 -L;n 027002 .0 .0 - a) -oocar) o - - a) ,_ 0 -p_ 2 .c ,- < I ,0 0 cu 0 — — 0 r, 5 f, „HD -..„ ru 0 8 , -0 co , = r Si' -=. tc -0 -7- - u; a) a) 2 5 ;72 5 0= La x o vc < co z 0 C tb 4 c ca _c a) cu c _ _c -6 CD a) a) = _ _ a - 0 CL.... ay CNI 00 f, ,,,..- z b - c 2 Fe -0 -01-; cal o ,LD G.; a9 3a) a)" 2 2 05 ,_ -c... 8 ;r:7 =a, b- iz -0 it s ay 7 (/) ra cv CL Cij -C3 co 5 ,_ _ 0 a) c < ° ° I- C 0 nO >, CO --' ne coca-% 5 cbmco .- 0 - i- cco CD cl; E r5.1 5 5 a) 5 _ > En. 2 = o o o ccil a) 0 ci E a - , o E..- : = -0 a ?_-, co L 2 0 o .0 --c-v ;--0- 0 E < .0 8 P co 0=,_ .- S2 = 0 co mc - E ° .cc70 O 0 ,c E >:, ,_ a) ca ,_ ,_ c 1- o 2 - 0 - .0 --- o 2 °3 ,=. ,„ .c a 5 a) 2 art 1:3 E -5 CI ft, v.) t ,.., E. 1-•• :., ",nn ra co o ci- ouc - 500 ° -occi3. wad 2 2 2 1- .0 • -colsci = = !E careicnco po .- cc CO La o - _0 c co ,_ c c cp --- '- 9 ..-• ° al D to 6 =-7--74 c Eco - o > 00 - CJ)Nou - CO Cr) C — I- 0 r c < 5 2 F .,-- a) g -5. I: E >, g 2 E = 0 >' -E 0 2 Fn i- CD &) 2 Co ■- = Mi9 0 8 0 ro. ci) 5 73 u) -0 -■-• 111 -0 cu V) 0 -5 co ca 0 --, ..k a c_) o , T2 C-) c 2 a, c c a) - fy a eti 5 0 2 - m-ra 5 c E a) o '-- co -0 o o o a) 3 ° -0 .= ° -Ou on ot wa) •• 0 5 1-',) kL o- 2 a) n o 2 = t- c..) - .0 .-- - w ro • '- a, 0 0 ,,, cn o_ - 8 thn 3 ID co - _ 2 :- az.- a; - E ° c 0 a) W-,` 0c ca co u) W a) 5 2 o c 13 ti 2 a ra. .=c, 0 , 8 , 2 -CU) ..-C --° -0 u) - " P. 8 u a; (n (..) -(5 • -- = u- , z 0 ° 8 to ! th th 2 E c =r- co 2 cal 2 a, r -cc o -c-) =c°w '2„ 0 0 M .2-, -oco)a. 5c) 0 E o o= aE) "r2co,)-c(0). a0,.).. ac)a Dc> -2 F6 cnEo ca 2 2 .ttc 0m o CD 0 L a 7; 0 To ED- S3) c) L- u) u) c c u) 6- a) 0 - -0 - 0 -Eracc •E cc cca) ow c 0 :1-0 • pa 'r - a° E =05 5 oc 2-2 c) F) F5 a > 0 ° ° ° - a) 01 - o - 7-) a - il:r.!i 7<- o o o E 2 o u_ io -o a) a) c 0 E 2 67 -7c- at a ..2 -Tr c :rt CC E 0- C G,H, I ,&J- 117 a) u ` C D R 0 a C E • D D 0U ICU D V V • R m Z N N N N 7 C C <I. C C u) A 'O C a) .0 a) a, to > ❑ _ C O O , t E D O 2 > a 3 a 0 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ -:c 0 V) CO N (A co y C C C C C c @ Cu co co @ Cu w G a E. E. a a C C O O O °' D :. O O O O O - 'V t Q ra U _� U N a) m a) N E O) m 2 O) O) 2 O) 2 C .> .> .> .� .> W G y C C C y C y > d a d m ° ° 50 6- 0 = = 0 = 0 a> 1- > K m m 0! Co Co CO Co Co a) m >, Co p_C_ .. J y- .- O Cr O d O• . LL U U U U U U U U U U 0 N s O c P o Nw C C D O d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it �O m m m m no m m m m m m a) a) Q 0 C -0 -O U S 5 N -O .>-..c -O C O C• co @ ...('3 -O = .c .0 C 6- V 3 O L_ L_ N@ o y •@ C a) @ y co [1 @ T a) a) C O O c D 2 `O U N o o > E ° ra N m � = o m o ° ohm v E oa 2 r_ ° @ @ J G, O p ° '§ � m a Q d y To p 3 o Oct '= c, O j = -D NU a) U N 2 a) O .c N O L @ (a ° @ = a) .0 U N V) CC ° .a.) U E '" L a) co a) O 2 n O) ° co G) 3 -- >, ° Ti.) N to j a N N @ ° _c C .0 C N . 7) T-0 �� .0 0 L N l °• � L° c .E Xo @O@ ° OncE rO 3a� mam omm ? ac N C N al 'p ° 'O N C° 0 a) 0 °O > O O `° (a E - > @ @ E X E _'_° O co - N J .— >, a) ,- C — CC o_- N .j o. O U 2 i N J V v) U U N C �7 N a d v U d O Z C > p- > N d O V O y 0 y a E ° ... >+ O. U N @ N C C@ @ ° 0 2 ° j - .0 ° . .O O y 0 J > . a) d N n C c 2 O O` o O) o .- CO. N @ @ 'y ° �• 0) x o, E U ai n a) J 5 U @ 'y O > c• 15 N ¢ O)5 1, c N U U V) 3 O. -0 N > C C �Q C N U Q• ` ° y ° C4 0. cu a O C N c @ = °)a) a) 3 0 CD y . o @ Y E L O D. - @ a) N N L °) N N di w o w C C N J O N O D. C O) 2 C a a) 2.a ID •D aN m a p m O C y a) c @ t ) - > V C 'w ° V U r a) o L N j 3 O = .0 U m N ._ N co C D O a) o N co r . a s @ CO O@ a) CO � F o CO 5 c 2r en y m o Ed co o O C - O) � U a @ J a N C -o G,H, I ,&J- 118 it4 w ; m M- f ws. a C E �" 4 • OU O L VRN.ay L N o V N — V V V i.�zi -w V N Z N N N N N A:-P.' N N !ro co -O = ...k 7, cu rc ft) m is s 4S C 0 r ?i vm it n�ra t ,' iCfli ¢;s 0 a a a� > 0 0 V V v. N zj co c 0 c a a 's+- N a co "T- A- cv co co co co a) C a _ N co fi@w o - a a a a a ., a a . o `o `o o `o `0 0 0 `o 0 C w _ a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) 'WWI .N a) a) a) o d Cl) • a) aa) > 'a) �+� n 6 a)r > K EC K it Z K :=- d o L =' .' 4'i G di V —p 7 .r3. [— S . o d ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 4` "9 S 2 u_ V a a U U U -.-/ m m V co a) 5 d �s c = h a0 P ifig ce ° m m m m m m ` a a a i ktarc AMR f L o � y d .c m 0) 0) md � ° ate fi c � n 6 m S o o ° y -o d o c o 6E C 'D c ° E a ° o • is a a) c Q °-O n E a) N O = c 1a V .c 0 O 2 a) 2 c m a m `off o m ° .- 0 ' K?a ca . o ; o 0 0 N C ai W '000 o° a) c C c , c E `o y i,�+ � a) E O a) rn O a) c n ac E C a 0 --C•0j O ° ° . o2 � °E $ `m ;€ �0 co .c4 N .0 ° o ft, a) do mnw a .m aria Uy > � c2 °i in.. ) 0 03 -0 ,, I. a) a) n v c L � -0 3 N O m O y a) 0 0 O a) O A i U W 0 , m o O Omac �� o > E m� � m � dmdcmN a ' -ea- 3 � EEco •0L -62 ca..' .rr a) `0 mi 0 co —° aai e aiW 0) ° o0 0z3 oc - Eo _ L and > QE mdc , A to •••"`" a ° i= _o _ E � cc `o °_ @ � V � m� � � , 0 00 of 0o)'p- ma oa rEm ry ti", 00 , - E '0 ° ca) co m Z 0 co E cco j .O O N -5 -c 0 'V C .c °O ,-,1 a) d 4 d a) C o co : . a '=O a) E >. a) r n'5 a) w o a) d o 2 ° 0 � do ° 2 4:::,_ d = yL a m aE ID ° ate > o ° E 2 9 3 o c o m u, o@ a Co 'i .0 � d o cLi a? 3 0 c S m o o E c 0 3 m ° -o dcf) )ri 2 a) > A0 u, 3 .a mn d 0 m m � Q °- O `o c om ° 203 2c ELV a, `o co 03 �.a)1 o o d a , E .c a ° cn o v 3 o c �, m o 'q 9 ,c o O L a1 N co N N U c N 3 O 3 m ° O) p�� w $ ai ' 4) �E E d r- "o • 2 _ L 3 — 0 o a7 m ° -0 d !la) a S r c sot a) _ E NON a) 3 tC -8 n ° c it mW1J_ co c . _ a d a o a) C N Vi a) 0 i= c 3� E 0 = 3 ccsi , a) a) o) m -o � cc 2 n aE °D) a) V .0 E co a) a) co E O )0) E r c a",:,-: z�.� C j a) N 2 L 0 N N `O O O` a) co �, d a1 C L y m S O > tzti .0 a) 6 N Q m =`j5 CO O° N > y I- ° t) y dal ¢ = as ¢ � ¢ 8 .6 a_ .T 12 � Fd ° 3 = acidm8. G,H, I ,&J- 119 co U i C o c . w Q O• O U . Nc O ? C V - v V co 2 ra M co co a7 N . To a c a) • CD a) to > n a o o u -C w a a a a n > a a 0 o `o `O a a n a c 2 a) 12 2 w o c c O . c rs O o 0 0 `0 0 0 = m a a) N a) a) > a)y C N C C N H > 0 C 0 C 0 E CC W CC O) A C U • 7 r "E rr 4- • O v • O E u. U 0 0 U U U V. 0) a) c a `o N '' C C O o ' 0 0 0 o 2 m m m a a a a 0 a re ° LO o m 0 C (0 C N E C O C N - C p O a C CO N 3 ai a) _ .O 2 D U c C O N U E U U O _ E C N co ay y E 0) O '> U .0. N N N O O ry .3 m` i C N m v min >, c m . as c -- 215 = a U m w a °� 0 CO N 0) N 0) N C O a) U@ 0 C O a7 O U O .c0.. C) C E N —° 3 � N O C a C LL. O) N 0) a) L c N a co 0 0 O co = U 7 C C N 41 9 N C y a3 N ° «O N N E C N cr c N a7 W E 2 0L. as co N co C N a) U N U +>". C co a) 'U a7 To in• 0 0) > N 0 0 ._ 0 0) 7 - o y U .� E cu N 7 O ` V y N d a N _ _ C O O O a7 2 C .... 5 ? N N aI 0 a p) N 0 ,U a a 0) o m o o r v 0 o E ° E .c .c O 'N - a o _ �a C N a) C O m y U m N a) .c a O U C UO E N 0I C Q) N 0)'0)N 0 a) O N L .c o ■ o -c2 c m '-- E o . m c O m - O Z 0NV 0 - ft' ss E � E o 0 o . m -o 2 -o o m .o_ 'c a) r c m • o)m N C N N m N N m O E U N C c c N E co a 7 a N 7 N 0 .N C C . ID 0 u 0meCD a) - a & ° -0 � > ome ? a CoEcNU EEo > @o ° °°. co Aa a) 0 7 > b o' = 0 0 0 n N G O O N a7 0 0 0 0 m 'UO a CO N y N (a CD t) a) (D C7.-o y ' a_ ° C a 7 0)' a E .o E o U d C c o 0 U a7 o m c O C c d L .O E N c 0) N m 2 a N >. a) D c In ' >. >'7 ° § ID- a) a3 O O N C O` N O N E O • O• 0 L.. W C •a 0)O O O to al a7 a) O a C O E a N Cr N a) ° U O o N a ° N 7 W UC7- E O O N .3 > a) C)N - U N U m O C o@ t7 > ° C NL. U o OU N aa)) j U :a 0 E CD E -0 -p O = L _ as o o ac o m c a7 0 ._= .- w W :N 3 `m U � a � o_ m _ a) U U a3 m U � � E m ti IL' '13 3Diq E ° = ',°-n) y a = aci E m CI CD G,H, I ,&J- 120 • a) ° o@ N a c E • O O t m D V a • N Z Cr) i7 v C 7 cc) u) R F- a 'c me F a) N 6 > O C D ta a O O L .. E > p aa 0 0 pa o ''t _.. — _ — O O p a a a a a a C E 2 o o 2 2 •- o o rs `o o `o `o 10 0 3 3 3 -,_== a o aa)i o o a) a) .a) .a) _ a`) a) o a) K O) > • Cu C p .f • � C o v U 0 LL U 0 CO CO m p o) . _a) C st •Q O Co = C C O o 0 N^2 m . z2 o. a a. a. m a • a U a) ¢ ..a U L C a7 a) O O y N C a) ac a) a L a) a 0 a) O O Ea � U ar ° a) � o ° � —°O ° o) t° a0 W = y a > > V '- w o d o c o 0 E E E y c c i. E 0 •N ` a) puma, 0c y r2 -0 m ° � � c a '6 '-' 00300E80-1:5 t° a a E o o .? °C) @a o y'c ° @ O Li _ a � a) a3o EO cav `°)mEmmd t0 ' ... -y mu°im � oam a O) N .L.. N C ° o O).O a) a= L.. O)— E o N (a C) N t a) N C ma) @a , aa)) 3a0y a? o L cm 6: o a („9 EyE ° oocn a) a ° u Em c aia C aI c m° .oa •E `m y v E ° a Nc `00) E coca) = � °yo LCCt o 0E22 C a) E - Eai dEac Co20c° U V0 aa ? OOC . EE .co c I mi'".= .� Eo Ec0 .c c � Eam ° a) 0EE -5 2o, •! .= co 2 a) o ° a) -C . `m 0 a) E 0 0° o o > o o d ate- y N o `°- m 3 0 ° a .c E o O E j c ' 2 C O a 2O E 2 To O " c 0 a-o ° N C O CO -0 C C ° C N D ° N O aa a)Z C c 2 2 To O O ° y 0 N a o y O ° o = O • O O O o a) E N o o 'C = a)0. E o m a m ° cL' .0 c .o o m a) " .o o E c o 3 ` m a) - a ° a ° c a o co co L o) o m 'mc •cr. a) o c a) o ' y a" o Z a _ E c a) E W Q _ a) U p)E U o o a) '> o y E al C a a1 o .o-, y "-- o o CO c o N aa)) to E ° c = _ EE °' o) o ° d 'Oa) EaL o o ° = 'w -o0 • o c ° ' 0 0 o) c ° uii to0a ? oc. ca _ ma, mEm Em Uy 0a) ` UO a@a.o • fi - o 0c a) CD c 3ca-- o ._ E ° aai ° m9ifl° aiaci ° 2 o — mE '> mE °_ Edy mmE c a ° o) ? mEa>'a0. = J a@ n : o -c d '_a o) o) .2).2. E E o a ° m 9 aoia ao a °oamo ¢ ca >.u) o20N = w' aoc " �c 'E cO mowO C . mmm a) ao ¢ dEa moa = m ° aamU co y > C O co a) m a a) . . '_ o co o a N Co E a 2 • • • G,H, I ,&J- 121 _7 , _ 0 U rc.ii4 c E D O • U �7 kt c 44 o ft, o ur;, v N F{ui4 To . `''' -c c ,s t v N la > 0 - H; b O O q Y ID 0 61 1 s IC 2 > ❑ o 0 o s :r o c o •ra U U 0 U r. V O U U m m m m2 P O) 2 0 U O) 2 !C i- C ; C y C y C y yy C y - m C u) a) a) D o J D j 0 j c �'A4` j O C uaj •� C it > m :*5' ❑ o ❑ o ❑ o ❑ o ❑ u S ❑ o - TX C U O 0 tom. Dd O0 5 LL O + U 0 0 0 0 0 (0 a co S _N L Ma til a O Le C C O O Awl m 0.aa)) 0 51.10, O 0 0 0 {���•.� O O ° a CO m CO CO 'Ma m a L co C �_��33 N U .0 al o p •-- C C a o o k•2A C o v) S@ C _c D) a) N gLal m ; 0 `� omm Oa _Na) ; O m 'Va y@ -o 0 UL Da Di D! 0 O ° 1:18 . m a) o f c y ❑ E o , N.a a) a`) a E a m 3 aci0 �` ° 2c°i .c a = mL L aEi OcE ° mom = a c � 0) c3 `0 C a7 . O a C - 3 c Q 0 O a, N U 0) o 5 O 0 L.• N E � 3 � Y c U ° c , ° c E a) T d m m e .0 a d m N 0. N , W > 8 �J C `° U CO ° O. U V N E s£ 3 C a) .- - 0 `� O C D. T T+ Op (n�y` a) o 0) O) y co C 0 co von .,€ O C m N O) m a) .0 U L 4'j ` N C .m. C N 4- m GCE 0 m L N tt 11 O. ..T. V C 0. N a c C• d�- N 'O CO 'C N C N O - - UC � -c) Ed " mOEc = . a)) 'o — O maa)) aLa m ° m4m oov) a 'o C c _o Si? mEN aoo i„ "E' om .§ y .Em ° — a ° o ,� °—) a2p0O c0 € a a0a 0--' m �<<_y 3 � ro o om - yc O N ` N C. M N y T'3 ` = m N > g-co >, O a) ?' U E C C Z C C O 5=rte, �' U V a3 > W O" N a a) N Ky_ O. o. N N O j 0 a) O E 0 0 a) O. . a C =O _N O 0 y a T E N N a C C 73Er O m 7 L m m C C N C ca = u EFL _o a) yN5E0 cNc a0EN ,ua ° .._ 0 0 ° ONwrc .0 fecog m in Q E m• 0 _�t m m T❑ 0 j ° z O ni iiIliulflPJ p d 0 d y as O) N O).-- S r 0)._ ' m c c E� _= 00E -cz Nc00 = y n 2amc m • c ' '" E 7 e•6y IJ a Q0 C iU a) '0 a d O 7 O O ;Q e N co 0 (D m a) 2 d 0 C)-8 L - U r a) Cf1 5_ no f7 U O E >,-2 co m N a s an U � —, m h0> r N c a) u) - ,_ a a) E >O> N U ,m ° a — 7 ° 0. o)'• a ° E °)''• -c 'o > . d )- U E am) " m0- O -c > N ',imp, -o .- U N 0 L Q C N C N 2 C7, F- wC: 3 u- m ca "5 T O u) ,- 0 I m E .O f- 3 E w m F o mat E G,H, I ,&J- 122 0 U i C O ° t, a = E • O O [o U = Q Q 0 cn O • Z v Z v Z N N N • 'o = - 0) O) ni C D o a0 O U L w • 1: . E > < < Q Q ' 0 . 0 C co C = C c C , - 0 0 0 o O ° O C O - 0 ..0 U U ° y'O = U aE o) 2 o) E o) 2 3 C U ..- = ., C y C c y 12 O 0) E- O) 7 0 7 c 7 C c N m o I- > Co Cc°.+ -Co C ° C it as 2. Co C U Co; v • 4-• 7 w O• d p Ea i� U 0 0 0 N. a a c s `p 0 = c 0 D a2 m m CCw CO- a 0 m cn c d 3 v yva . ° L. Q) c - ° a o = C -O ° O — - 0 2 co N 3 O ° U 0] — V;"5 L - o Y E = N 0- ° E ` yy y 7 c d oc m ° ° co ao r a 0 -C o , y L E Ea C C O 7 N O _ 0. 0. > 'C CO C D — _ '° d 3 O E _ — l9 0) 0 0 7 2 C 07 0) - o 7 p (0 = O. U p C To 2 0 v O L 3 0) a' N f0 -• 0 . co v L E N 0 d c 0 � 0 Co = 0 o f L.in cO = yo Do c° a� - mvi ° E °- �t 0 3 m 2 U E 0 c as u co Uco • and c � � co el acE C CD O O 0 E L O 30 3 CO '- O. 0) v ° L N C W ° ° CO E — W o (0 - v •- N O O N O O co E Zv) = a� 0 � °� .NO -0 0E • 0m0 Ocim 0to � m ° = p p N L C U C U CO U C r U N. L N 5 O C = 0 0 O 5 - O N v .L_. _E "CO O7 0] 0 A a 0 C V > N - O � Q o acb o � v -° iac o `� 3 a @O of - 7 ° To ID O Dl C 0 C y ' C O m C C .° 0. > 2 l0 CO a - O)o L L s C - „7 0 C 00 O tr O C O v 0 = O @ V) >, o o) N C O ° = y • C u p C _oat '� 7 U oa 7 0 � o L• C) `o w > ° 0 0 `o to Na ac c') � 0 E ° m E E ° m a 7 m ° y oL 0 7v co E ' c = ma 00) Boa L Lc co = E u — v Ec in oo ~ av rn— ° 5 a C y m o C 'a m .- o 3 0 'c 'm ° ° 0 o ui ow E 7 C "' N 0 2)) 0 0 0 8 E . co o O L a E p L O C t N a E F- E 7Z- 2 °) 0E. a� 0) I- G7 cn .- F- v 7 .J y - < 8 I- .. m o E o >.E G,H, I ,&J- 123 a, U y C O a3 N 0 O 0 • ° O UU• C C . co O Z N N N a) a -0 C a) c E N it [6 > in • = p O '0 !0 D U . L w a) 0 U o 2 > U a a CO 0 (0 a) co C C 0 o D = a m `0 — 0 `0 -• 0 " C N O O 'n O ea C U 2 W C U C w > > O N a) O 0 on >, C U • 0 0 et W_ W yT O or � ° U p p O 2o. m m m co 0) N C 3 1.75" C C so 2 a0 0] CO O 0 x ° o_ o. a a> c 0 0 0 •C a) - C 0 a) a> a> .0 o 2 -° S ° a> wy h@ o an d 'N co a> > a> _`o W a-- E o m 0O ? ."� C 2 fa �� a> V) 0 O C O 2 a '3 0 U .C ° d a3 'y c d CO ° N ii o CD = T a co c () 0 ° m :B � c o •nCDcc2 E o m ioo 2> a, n Ga°ia> .NC dm 0 y _ i m c .o c 0 r o) E c° .o Oc) a) y 2 0a ya y ° C7 .o Y co c N o i y Y 0 9 O O O ca C 63 w ° O . O C O U c .0co° 9 0 `o0- CO Cm 'o E 'er ' u°> ° o • C • a`> c c v a vW y °� w y o •f °9 Na � a � E 3 mQ m � o CO C 10 c O U a) O '00 N c 0 CD o N N N co .° U '0 a)CD N C) co fa V .N N `> m O N co c U O. 7 Z `8 9 >, co .2 ° C c 2 Q C i - co 0 0 0 c y m � a> C U = m 0 a 0 N W 0 . >,CO tw 0 0 10 _ co 3 � i0 Ct0 _ ° v 33 cy ° 30 ova 5 `-' U yN cW ca•.r c y=) U c m W > C u) a) -- U 0 y a) N co"° O co of 1 — O U 5 to N c- C C a a> O N C C 0 ... c0 O) y a) 0 U O CO a7 O- c U D) 0 ° a 0 ti (n C 0 on C O O = U c0 a) C @ co .� a 4) .d U n4 c E f6 N d N U U • o. >. a ' 3 a) U a) m 0.3 E 9 • 2.10 O N y � D 0 7 CO -0 0_ 2 U a> e) C •° c w •O B y = moo = av c 'c @ o o aoi m o .om a) 22 o- 0" u af0 cu_ tir CD O r. a a> 0wc ' a, . co _c 0oo o -0 E oo > 0 a> E .0 a 0 ' m • ° a -. E— o _i =-oo o H 2 a 3 Q2 0_ ccon W oo III- 2 .3 � w .CO a I-- = G,H, I ,&J- 124 . • • as L) _ . o m N a • = E O 0 U L = m D N 2 N N En N 'O C . CI c y O N > 0 _ V m D O -C C N N 2 > U 0 a7 co C C Cu n) = a a O o O m O •O • m 0 a9i 3 w a) Ell o 5 D) T C U • _• = C tr D a O 2 � U 0• CI) C) `O en .-o• O C D D • a2 . CO CU U O tc 2 m m 'O co..: T O a) T a) L 0) O U C @ 7 O N N CO n CO(O ° a0U y > --0-0 ) . E a 0. O a) ° 0 ' = E O . o >, ' .0 a5 > 0 u m = m — C •- C O O. ) r3 C 0 0) —co C § = N o m • N a) O = O O = Q) a) O 0 J W d — d 2 U 'a 0 V CM N• = [a C o (J C 2 y C .O C @ 7 ca E — Ny > y0 a as _0) o I 3 0 o O) D O) U N D O U C 0 -0 V `O C O O Z -° � m o) x m � O a � `o y 0 r-• 7 0 E C C C L O (n O) y C O=I U CD O U m C CO CO 7 0) N O T C , CU L "O• m O O L ID < -O 0 E -E—) ai 0 -D5 .o 0 0 -0 O m a) 0) 2 c C O 0 C 7 m O co O w = C C O O • O (=a co n) ai a) a 0 C o a) C - N C O U O a=) .—o E `a) 3 0 — _ ' -O O m o a) a'O '„° r m ,, E 2 ` N a) >` E C C C N N O O) C U (6 a) ) y •O Q d 0 0 N 0tU p)Na N .r O. 0 co 0 0 _ _ _ C _ 8).5 O m .t— ,E U (a M E O ❑ R— o C J C .0 n) J §i C C C G,H, I ,&J- 125 C U O w to a E w ' S D O , U s i'4 : V) Z N ;.2-- a N -=-S N V To -:-3 -D c a) C • C) a) W nt- -.'» > O 1 _ *" •E O a m 1/ D U �';!. t 4= 1-}:: 5 U > U a '- w .. C D •- `O p .N 0 , �O _C U 3 C U >_— a) O a) > w. E O) a>) O C O � > ✓- > It a N C a En a c U t_ p m ',tin r• „- 0 •W` -c U O u; _� LL Q o ri m r s we "x N .O O D 0 D ,E m a IlXii w p IY ° a - 0 4 w �.v�::z E ° = ° it ° aio ° p) (c(ppE -'`mm2 O) co aa, O cu a) N N U C U O U w ' E To: .0 aii •p .- 3 3 a 3w ° � .aN ` � w _ o co a @ ma) ` �0 c ° c E ° ma) o ) ° a o°)U a a • v w 2 N m a a s p• N O V m o m a mOa= p _• i_ U 1 E w - c a N .°5 a) 3 `- D' d N c a O c 'D a) -§ a) U C C 'D O c0 _. C w &c L 'U _m _ � � . a) c N J w C w a) C C a) = a) > . w a C 6 0) a) U U c C U p a) V C a) as r - a N O E a) N _3a'''i`; C O p E _ .0•Z .w w C N .-U -c to a) N 2 Vl w 3 C :.] .- D) CO c la a m D .c a c E W w m c o v m U m d d a °)._ > @ -5,, 7 U a) = a) OU o t C N Q a1 y -p C w Q, lsla:: O m `) p CD to II) E C O °) a) p U O p p O C ) Tit a) 2 _ ° o a • w ca we a) ,E)a = m m m c m c- a) .J ° m 0 c E c = h° d 0 m E ca E E .,` c m - •p c w w m_ M 1- . ° o ° • D N m as -5 8 m w -m a -o t a) m - = y 00), v� a o Cr) E cr,is E N a 3 d E ° a U C C w •C a) a) as a .0-- O m a `• 0 ` x N a O` - V a3 CO N O) a) a) N _m > y 7 , O ,±Th _ N .- _ ...-• co a ya wa ° cage w ., ° ca we ° p ° a ;v' `o_ mmcmc .z r a n) c m U 7 m ° ! U! m °c it 0—8 aa)) :Z`, d cco > 72 o °> r 6,n, I ,&,1- 126— a) U ` L D m s a • = E O 0 u U m o e v v v c fn Z Ni N N N N N @ -o = a) = c o a) la > 0 _ O D 00 O U S w a > a a 0 0 0 Co to CO Co Co C C C C C as @ as @ @ = a a a a a .. ° o - o `o `o 0 0 co > ' > >> cc I- > a K cC cr rn >' C U i __ 'a' O d 1— • _ ❑ o d U• m U m CD U m Q 0U] Q U 'S° r D) 03 , Jo D In • • C C D 0 a2 re 12 m CO m on CO C N C z p) c `O O S.o c . E ca c a) N O C T O E C >. E "O a ° J @ O C 7 @ @ ° ?i O L a) -co" co -6 to a' -. rn N N y CC O CD CN C O C K m O E O y o o U a O ° C °" ° a L @ C@ N L C a) c m O > C N a v as a) a • a ° ° ° ax ` � oo° E a) ' E .° ocNm -Do >,, o) m @c �L '.- rata = Ea) ° aca a � 2 oo m ° - a) oEI -2 a20o t ; o co a a) -0-o E a) o.r, N _N C C. L' N n __ a ty°i) O N m C a an d C a ....__ a, ca@) EEoccn.E _c a) o � 0 >,� o > ° oa o moo = L � o � N C Lo N E @ ° @ •C O O N C ``- ° O U N W O ` 0 y N N j ty_ @aa)) o ° o)�v) @Ecnoa`) oo0$ 0. E0 af) a05 odariinE ac) af) Dl ' E yaoouoc ° cc � t@n . C ECOE ` -o . m .E .°)--,7_ Em. o ° o Eo @Ec -o @ a) @ aps oo � a � a � E o @aUE•Z � DyC .JD. ° °- � EmCC , � N ... -- E2 ° a@Qmx 0. = c N o - E 0 c ° r o o `3 0 a E g c E CO a U ° @ = ° as c '2 ` 1 E a) " @ .=. OW N E O @ (a ° @ T a) V a) o >, a) 2 a) N co a) SA O a o a) •C o@ U x C C ° c c= r o a) L 2 In O _ u 0 0 O Hill u 0 co O • E C ;O : C _ O . n O U U • ° o WE oWE = c o00 0 - oO a !: 4U111 U to N _ iffi a @ d O).O @ C TM C -0 L E E N a L _ Q : U tiya a:.r. U u} • C m O c- 7 .tt vgl co 2 N N N 2f 7 N CV N CalTo L N 0 - ;Yk1e'�S = r- 0 'O a S• w r a a R' U U L O a a a t O O O O °,M i a) U rnp 3 3 3 c at L ) L .- a) a) a) C , 0 E 5 c H > a) IY m _m a a riii iT T L U V4 _ O = 0 Q 0 ?` - O m U U U '-z- O o Y 2 LL m m m _ U U 1- CI- Ili a) L - L O c L O O a� `e m 0 a) p O 0 0 p a m .2 m m m a a O O (a o O a) O m ,a) d E L 2' C a) `y- c o > m (trig a) 'O o l0 -O -c r- (a L N L 2 u) T y E 0 a7 N N i _ C ` 0 a) 0 LO _p w . o c -O co - a) N o E 2 C -0 m U C = N p > U 'c .92 ?' as c a) a) a) a1 V m -o a) N O O - °! a3 a) a) s.. -§ J y a) c a) .V C U o02 >,d2y aag5, EotLC7 a) mL5U' „, W d 2 - 0 oa .N O p 0 g = o a) m L N 0 U Z X U a v, m .m a 3 t •y o o c °a o 0 ' o.'-'c —N E W �y a) U d a) m a.) a) = m o°. a) a N O p -- c - - N U w Z o w o - O d II 64 O up m a) O o w o co o coos waa) c ; aD a - c Wd s4)= 2 „' aco m 0 c ON > " E v a) E o oo 'NOCmao) Ew m >U>' mc _o. coo ooOa � 's-s - 2 Ea' 5c ma _. ..- a =3) a:1 _@ C 7 - m y U C C -C c N 9 Al-13 G N O - N N 'O a) C c O y o W -= CN 2 O E 'E -o a) a) 'O N c Q C N o 'O • 'a)a)O N c .0 d O 5 a O)o N w a) t a O W y L d ..15=-:w: a) 0 - 12 - u) C Q 0 U W -E J [) .c .0 U N m E L ° E o a o) _ 2 O c0 o t 02 ,7; .V_ t o y O F Z Vi C Z •j a w = Lo E d .c ° m vi °. ). E Q .E X °)o m c m `m a > Vii- of -aa)i C M Lo . o U 0 f a a0 u) LE > -o `mm Cwy � c o = cao � m0U OOy t. a aa) o wao mva ino m Q a V O V 0 c O 0 r c a) 22 a) a) a o .c E p E o E )N E a) Q = ti y p- o a) m E o) to m '2 m m - o a 025-) co - c o p _E ° c o a) ,wv -- o a) y 'o a-. 3 -0 c o _ -Z m o = w m Qvi as- a) _,'w - = m mW cU a? c .� tL a c = a) `ocU m aa' 0 -oo m2 • LL .aaao -ocpoc ococoas mycooy 'oo o po � .a � ,E, 5 an 3 -a- m o cu d �' gay moa)ga)= = alidE ° w o � o `m2 ? a�i � CD VITA m � oc -C m .o - � � c r. a �C C E N C A E a) 0a N `1 a O aL y C w 5 C a C �,_W_; a o '° W E .c .o w T-op o N L 2 p a= .- O m n a) O O ..O. _ K a) ... Z - Z - c .5 G a) O o C 0 L > L _ J pea 05 E a I- DF ... '° a o 30Um o OmU '.Z; Q a) 5 SUS ; QU o 3U G, 1, I ,&J- 128 0 U .;A. a = T 15 Yu a , ,.z 2 O1 SL a • E o U xFLL 9 U Td _ J O ! a m O C = 44 o N.- : 4, p N 0 D U) Z Cr V Q • i 9 m U 4 zo o 5 ` d N _ o D o 1Z r ;'<C, 2i CD [0 07$ p p U y s .4= �;{� U L C p O o p U U p' 2 o) p, = p 2 0 2 a C _ C o C y C u, c o 0 E c C C C y, i- > 0 o D o 0 U m o v t(y- 0 a U , N .on >. 1 C= U " O O a —s_ p d Q CO U w • = p sco - 2 U U 0 0 PI ; E d . O�.- D D' o a o a 1-- � > O 2 — S5111); t370 ) -ea o N O D 0 �m 0 w p in ;. t U CI o ix w m m o_ o_ '),Cd,W F J... m i.. yo-, o Lm. T m LOO C Y N m@ N > := > a) N T L T ■m L L m .O m 1`Sp a_ F mo --. '- - a) E - coo ° U 'o `m Cm `o -o co d � a°i a) o. N ° t m c m -=p c a) ac) x To ° m a ¢ m U m a) N co in >, E 0 a) C ', a O a) a) N O a) m = L O. m C7 0 o ; C a) a) a > 02E: CO .0 a ate) y 3 cY , o c ° ate) c CO 0 U 1._ t O r m E 'p a) a) m co o c 0 c c aa)) ac) x vi o, m ° c - acorn OyE y = U ° c � 0 � a) mc' m � E ° -C= 0 CO mXE00 c . E ° � y = c _ � 'a v a) a) N a) ... - m a) a) O m m m t «,R `o Y m E m E .2 c)2 -5 m �' =. 2 o a) ai E a) a c ao ° 9 `�- 4' o> .- O ` > . ~ °> . . — OmmUm Nm U m O : T- Cm _O W i d ca ) C — m y a) 2 rG . 0 0 'O > 0 N L O y 3 O 0 U y m y" m 7 :p C C COI O - • C O °) p m N W p C D L O a) C m c o U m O N Vc U — L m C m 0 0 C L v ^' Z m p ° C am CO °) v° '5 an ,2 o = E o 3 a N m . °O = o 0 0 ,Eo - o am C C o C C m C U y 1- o d 0 )D E E m C Y E ` L d 001 0 9 T m a) O N a) ` aac » U .= aT Q m C kW- O U 2. 0, O L V O N y O a) a m X o _ a C N L ` w :u )' U O 0. m > > U) o C m c w „.0..: r ° v 0 00 ,- >mrn oo = m o o > a) OmO L N C a 0 a = m -0 Y ^0f; 2 O J m 0 C N w C L a L � N D o O y m i:; m m r L N• = O c o O N O m O 2 O vi c W P N y D ° O c L -0 co ' U W W E O 03 2 N ' O (n Q N 5 co[0 C W ` y . ca O d 2 ca 2 V ,Or ca , 'o C C mC a a) W a p Ni a a) a) _ m '° d a a O O O D a O -:Ih 4 O E. U D�laO p> U> � O c C r._c O w o O'- .N O p O C a) Lac G -C C C N cc m p U m m C a) O m c a ); U W U L C C U w r 0 C U L co L N ( m F- m = L = C L co a U co a) ti o a. U G,H, I ,&J- 129 N • 0 N O a O o y o °' o ❑ c > C Y O a 11 • N N .� an K iX U e YS to r y c 0 ri a N a m 0 0 0 to 0 E n N n O 14-0 • 7 O a, m E o U c 0 a O O ❑ W U . O C 0 O V N d N N c N Y m a L U N . E O N - OH m U L a • v U o a .o N C m a ± c O O U maU- o- G,H, I ,&J- 130 arta W44" City of Rancho Cucamonga • w♦� MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18819, Design Review DRC2011-00629, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638. Public Review Period Closes: December 14, 2011 Project Name: Project Applicant: Water Mill Homes • Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. Project Description: The proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots including the design review of 16 homes; a request to reduce the minimum average lot size and the minimum lot dept requirement for 1 lot associated with the project and a request to remove 63 heritage trees on the project site found within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is • proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. December 14, 2011 Date of Determination .. Adopted By • G,H, I ,&J- 131 RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18819, THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF 10.6 ACRES INTO 17 LOTS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND VICTORIA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20,AND 21. A. Recitals. 1. Water Mill Homes filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 18819, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of December 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 14, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18819, Development Review DRC2011-00629,Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638; b. The 10.6 acre project is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street,with a street frontage of approximately 490 feet along Etiwanda Avenue and a street frontage of approximately 635 feet along Victoria Street. There is an existing Historic Point of Interest on the site, the Johnston House that will be relocated within the project. There are 63 Heritage Trees that will be removed as part of the project, and one tree, a Deodar Cedar will be preserved in place; c. The property to the north, west, and south of the subject site is existing single- family residences, the property to the east is Etiwanda Intermediate School; d. The site is located within the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific • Plan. The lots range in size from 20,281 square feet to 29,099 square feet,with an average lot size of 22,003 square feet; and G,H, I ,&J- 132 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819—WATER MILL HOMES • December 14, 2011 Page 2 • e. The project was designed to conform to the development requirements outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan for the Very Low (VL) Residential District. • , 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- '..--refetenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 • above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed • subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. • G,H, I ,&J- 133 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 • TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819 — WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 3 • • c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089- 081-16, 17, 20, and 21. • 2) The applicant shall submit an application for the relocation of the • Johnston House and office. The application will consider an Agreement of Purchase and Sale to acquire property for the relocation of the Johnston House, associated with the subdivision Tentative Tract 18819. The Agreement of Purchase and Sale will be subject to City Council review and approval, prior to the issuance of any building and grading permits associated with the development of the project site. Engineering Department 1) Etiwanda Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Special Collector"and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards, including but not limited to the following: a) Provide or protect cobble curb and gutter (24 feet west of centerline), asphalt pavement, 8-foot wide sidewalk/bike path, drive approaches,ADA access ramps and street trees per Figure 5-24 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. b) Replace asphalt sidewalk with a Class 1 bike lane a minimum of 8 feet in width per Exhibit III-7 General Bikeways Plan of the City's General Plan. • c) Provide (3) 5800 lumen HPSV street lights, as required. G,H, I ,&J- 134 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 4 • d) Protect or provide traffic striping and signage, as required. e) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment in Etiwanda Avenue. f) Frontage improvements to be made along the Not-A-Part parcel circumscribed by the project. g) The proposed drive approach on Lot 17 shall be per City Std 101, Type C. 2) The developer shall make a good effort to obtain dedication of an additional 4 feet of right-of-way for Etiwanda Avenue from the Not-A- Part parcel in exchange of frontage improvements, including street trees, bike path, cobble curb and gutter and a drive approach to City standards. 3) Victoria Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local Street"and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards, including but not limited to the following: a) Provide or protect curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, ADA access ramps, catch basin and street trees. b) Sidewalk shall be 8 feet wide, as an extension of existing • pedestrian trail to the west. Sidewalk shall cross drive approaches at 0" curb face. c) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV street lights, as required. d) Protect or provide traffic striping and signage, as required. e) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment in Victoria Street. f) Provide crosswalk at the southeast corner of Victoria Street and Grape Place to the trail on the west. g) Provide advanced warning signs for trail crossing at Victoria Street and Grape Place. 4) Grape Place frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local Street" and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards, including but not limited to the following: a) Provide or protect curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, catch basins, drive approaches, ADA access ramps and street trees. b) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV street lights, as required. • c) Protect or provide traffic striping and signage, as required. G,H, I ,&J- 135 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 5 • d) Provide drive approaches for local trail access. Driveways that cross trails shall be transverse medium broom finish. 5) "A" Street improvements to be in accordance with Local Street" and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards, including but not limited to the • following: a) Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, catch basin, drive approaches and street trees. b) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV street lights, as required. c) Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. . 6) Etiwanda Avenue"sideyard"frontage of Lot 6,which needs to look like a front yard, shall be privately maintained. Rear yard wall shall not extend into the front yard appearing area. Homeowner also needs maintenance access to slopes north of the Not-A-Part parcel. 7) Although part of the project site is within Drainage Area 8 of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area, the plans and Tract 15915 drainage • report show drainage going to the Day Creek Channel. General City Drainage Fee shall apply instead of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine one. 8) Tract 15915 installed storm drain facilities that accommodate runoff from this project, including lateral stubs(see City Drawing No. 1695-D). Incorporate, as much as possible,the drainage facilities anticipated for this project. Revise said drawing to reflect any approved changes. No . Reimbursement Agreement is in effect. 9) Etiwanda Avenue side yards will be required to look like front yards and shall be privately maintained. 10) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Victoria Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole west of Etiwanda Avenue to first pole east of Etiwanda Avenue prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Victoria Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. 11) An in-lieu fee as contribution for the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from • the center of Victoria Street to the south project boundary. G,H, I ,&J- 136 • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 6 • 12) The development requires installation of fiber optics conduits, vaults • and manholes on Etiwanda Avenue per City Standard Plans 135-137. Also,the improvement plans need to show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes using Standard Plans 135-137. 13) Show private drainage easement for trail along east side (Lots 7 and 16). 14) The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 15) Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections may have line of sight plotted as required. 16) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top-of-curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages, 17) For pads lower than street, driveway shall slope at no more than six • percent (6%) for the first 6 feet behind sidewalk. 18) Public improvements plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction • measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. G,H, I ,&J- 137 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 7 • 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. ' 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt • is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM1p emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. • 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. • 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. G,H, I ,&J- 138 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 8 • 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 12) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. • . 13) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane • • windows and weather-stripping. 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM25 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009.. Biological Resources 1) Heritage trees that are removed shall be replaced on a three-to-one basis with a similar species of a minimum 15-gallon size. 2) Tree planting,when feasible, shall follow the requirements established • in the Etiwanda Specific Plan regarding windrow replacement. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. 2) Due to the presence of the Johnston House and the former Frost. General Store, the project site shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist during demolition and grading activities. 3) Following brush/tree stump removal and slab/footing removal (following the demolition of standing structures of the extant buildings/decks/platforms) any grading within 100 feet of the Johnston House (and adjacent buildings) and the former location of the Frost General Store shall be conducted with controlled grading, in no more than 6-inch increments, to allow the archaeologist to accurately observe and monitor grading activities. 4) If previously undocumented cultural resources are identified during earthmoving activities, the nature and significance of the find shall be • assessed, construction excavation will be diverted if necessary, and a treatment plan formulated and implemented. G,H, I ,&J- 139 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819 — WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 • Page 9 • 5) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the • City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping • or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center forpermanent archiving. 6) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). G,H, I ,&J- 140 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 10 • • Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PKo emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions • 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-• stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. • 2) The construction contactor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. • • G,H, I ,&J- 141 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 11 • 7) To conserve water and to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan,.the following measures shall be implemented: a) The installation of recycled water irrigation systems, i.e. dual distribution systems, is required to allowfor future use of recycled water. b) Low flow appliances, i.e. toilets, dishwashers, showerheads, washing machines, etc. shall be installed if provided by the builder. c) A minimum of 50 percent of the landscape palette shall contain drought-resistant species. d) Turf (grass) shall not be used as a landscape feature in the common/public/shared areas; however, turf is allowed in the activity areas(s) in community parks (if any). e) The quantity of grass/turf shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the landscaped portion in the front yards. There shall be no minimum amount of grass/turf imposed anywhere on the site. • 8) The project shall incorporate enough points to be certified in Build-it- Green (builditgreen.org) or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). However, the project does not need to be officially 'certified' to reduce cost associated with the certification. 9) The project shall incorporate the following measures to reduce energy • use: a) Plant shade trees within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet of the west sides of properties. b) All units shall be constructed to be able to easily convert to solar power, i.e. solar ready. c) Photovoltaic cells (solar panels), tankless water heaters, and solar powered water heaters shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option, or installed. d) Each appliance, i.e. washers, dryers refrigerators, stoves, etc. provided by the builder must be Energy Star qualified if an Energy Star designation is applicable for that appliance. 10) The following measures shall be included in the site plan to reduce • motor vehicle emissions and to be consistent with the City of Rancho • Cucamonga's General Plan: G,H, I ,&J- 142 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 12 • a) There shall be pedestrian sidewalks on both sides of the streets in the project site. • b) The project shall install a Class I Bike Path on the western portion of Etiwanda Avenue adjacent to the project site. c) The project shall contain pedestrian connections to the uses • adjacent to the project site. 11) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 12) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: a) Increased insulation, b) Limit air leakage through the structure, c) Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • d) Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, e) Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, f) Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, g) Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 13) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • a) Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. b) Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. c) Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets, and waterless urinals/water heaters. d) Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- • vegetated surfaces. G,H, I ,&J- 143 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 13 • 14) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 15) To conserve water and to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan, the following measures shall be implemented: a) The installation of recycled water irrigation systems, i.e. dual distribution systems, is required to allow for future use of recycled water. b) Low flow appliances, i.e. toilets, dishwashers, showerheads, washing machines, etc. shall be installed if provided by the builder. c) A minimum of 50 percent of the landscape palette shall contain drought-resistant species. d) Turf (grass) shall not be used as a landscape feature in the common/public/shared areas; however, turf is allowed in the activity areas(s) in community parks (if any). • e) The quantity of grass/turf shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the landscaped portion in the front yards. There shall be no minimum 16) The project shall incorporate enough points to be certified in Build-it- Green (builditgreen.org) or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). However, the project does not need to be officially 'certified' to reduce cost associated with the certification. 17) The project shall incorporate the following measures to reduce energy use: a) Plant shade trees within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet of the west sides of properties. b) All units shall be constructed to be able to easily convert to solar power, i.e. solar ready. c) Photovoltaic cells (solar panels), tankless water heaters, and solar powered water heaters shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option, or installed. d) Each appliance, i.e. washers, dryers refrigerators, stoves, etc. provided by the builder must be Energy Star qualified if an Energy Star. • G,H, I ,&J- 144 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 14 • 18) The-following measures shall be included in the site plan to reduce motor vehicle emissions and to be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan: a) There shall be pedestrian sidewalks on both sides of the streets in the project site. b) The project shall install a Class I Bike Path on the western portion of Etiwanda Avenue adjacent to the project site. c) The project shall contain pedestrian connections to the uses • adjacent to the project site. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific • measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result • of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by Thielmann Engineers, April 9, 2011 and May 24, 2011,to reduce pollutants during construction . entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality • • Management Plan, prepared by Thielmann Engineers, April 9, 2011 G,H, I ,&J- 145 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 15 • and May 24, 2011, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the • storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by Thielmann Engineers, April 9, 2011 and May 24, 2011,to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General • Construction Permit. • Noise 1) The exterior unmitigated noise levels are about 62.8 CNEL, so exterior mitigation measures will not be needed. 2) All exterior building surfaces in the project will be exposed to noise levels of less than 65 CNEL, and therefore will require less than 20.0 dB exterior to interior noise reduction in order to meet the City's 45 CNEL interior noise standard. All rooms are projected to meet the City's 45 CNEL interior noise standard without building upgrades. 3) All buildings exposed to noise levels greater than 57 CNEL will meet the 45 CNEL interior noise level criteria only with windows closed. Adequate ventilation with windows closed must be provided per the applicable California Building Code. 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly • noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building G,H, I ,&J- 146 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-66 TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 16 • Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 6) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: • James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • G,H, I ,&J- 147 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT M } DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18819 SUBJECT: 17 LOT SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: WATER MILL HOMES LOCATION: SWC ETIWANDA AVENUE AND VICTORIA STREET APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20 AND 21 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • Completion Date General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / /_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2, Approval of Tentative Tract No.SUBTT18819 is granted subject to the approval of Development Review dRC2011-00629, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011- 00638. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolutions of Approval No.s 11-66 and 11-67, / /_ Standard Conditions,and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans(full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/ /_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration -$ 2,094.00 • SC-12-08 1 1:1PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM12011 Res & Stf Rpt1SUBTT18819 Cond 12-14.doc G,H, I ,&J- 148 Project NoSUBTT18819 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/ • Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 2. The Variance and Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not / /_ issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the prdject site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / /_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / /_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be /_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/ /_• consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all / /_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be /_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the / /_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/ /_ including proper illumination. 10. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed /_/_ control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 2 • • G,H, I ,&J- 149 Project NoSUBTT18819 Completion Date 11. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians /_/_ or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering • Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 12. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5%at the downstream end of a trail for a distance / /_ of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official 13. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local /_/_ Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 14. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District,at least one / /_ model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing. 15. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, _/_/_ construct minimum 6 foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split- face double sided block, 'slump stone'or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. • 16. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine _/ /_ animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 17. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/ /_ Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be • provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 18. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property /_/_ owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 19. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling / /_ unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 20. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. Any further modifications to the site / /_ including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. 21. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all / /_ lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. • 3 G,H, I ,&J- 150 Project NoSUBTT18819 Completion Date 22. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property • owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 23. Construct block walls between homes(i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 24. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 25. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. _/ /_ • 26. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each / /_ support post for all wood fences,with a minimum of two%-inch lag bolts,to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 27. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. / /_ 28. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to / /_ maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 29. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The _/_/_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. • • 30. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products. D. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and / /_ for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, /_/_ detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for _/ /_ Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or /_/_ projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design • 4 G,H, I ,&J- 151 Project NoSUBTT18819 Completion Date and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be • painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 5. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the /_/_ street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate.details on building plans) 1. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth _/_/_ from back of sidewalk. 2. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. / /_ 3. On flag lots, use a 12-foot driveway within flag to maximize landscape area. / /_ • 4. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on _/_/_ this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 5. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and / /_ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. • Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in _/ /_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 / /_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. • 5 G,H, I ,&J- 152 Project NoSUBTT18819 Completion Date 4. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size • shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area,and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously _/_/_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 6. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development _/ /_ Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls, landscaping,and sidewalks shall be included in / /_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the _/ /_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. • 9. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and /_/_ approval prior to issuance of building permits.These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/ • Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the project landscape architect shall certify on he submitted plans that the Xeriscape requirements have been met. 11. New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear _/ /_ feet per acre. The size, spacing, staking,and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19.08.100). G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special _/_/_ Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. • 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and 1-15 Freeways /_/_ in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. • 3. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation _/_/_ measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. • 6 G,H, I ,&J- 153 Project NoSUBTT18819 Completion Date 4. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of / /_ the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and • exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected • homes. 5. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of$557 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 6. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy),the /_/_ applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. H. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location /_/_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, liR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: TE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements . 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/_/_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached)including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., SUBTT#, SUBTPM#, DRC#)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. / /_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. • 7 G,H, I ,&J- 154 Project NoSUBTT18819 • •Completion Date 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/_/_1110 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the / /_ Building and Safety Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can / /_ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. J. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number(i.e., SUBTT18819 AND DRC2011-00629). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Califomia Codes, and all other applicable codes,ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition,the applicant /_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/ /_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. • K. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances / /_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. / /_ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. _/_/_ 4. The homes must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D. _/_/_ L. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading / /_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/ /_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / /_ time of application for grading plan check. • 8 G,H, I ,&J- 155 Project NoSUBTT18B19 Completion Date 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, /_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building • permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. 6. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall _/_/_ occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas,street trees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from /_/_ street centerline): 44 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue _/ / 30 total feet on Victoria Street / / • • 25 total feet on Grape Place _/_/_ 50 total feet on Street"A" / / 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. _/ /_ 4. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the _/_/_ final map. N. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source _/ /_ of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings,structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 2. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails, paseos, landscaped / /_ areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. • • 9 G,H, I ,&J- 156 • Project NoSUBTT18819 Completion Date 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: _/_/_ Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike • Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Etiwanda Avenue (f) X X X X X (e) Victoria Street X X X X X X • (e) Grape Place X X X X X (e) Street"A" X X X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) Access Ramps (f) Cobble Curb and Gutter. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: • a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights _/_/_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / /_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and / /_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. • d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/_/_ project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1.) Pull boxes shall be No.6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets,a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City /_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be /_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan _/ /_ check. 10 • G,H, I ,&J- 157 • Project NoSUBTT18819 Completion Date • 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/ /_ accordance with the City's street tree program. • 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed _/_/_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction . legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Etiwanda Avenue Eucalyptus Silver Dollar Gum 5' 40' 15 Fill polyanthemos O.C. GAL In Victoria Street Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 5' 50" 15 Fill O.C. GAL In Grape Place Quercus ilex Holly Oak 6' 55' 15 Fill O.C. GAL In Street"A" SELECT APPROPRIATE TREE FROM THE APPROVED STREET TREE LIST FOR RANCHO CUCAMOGNA. LIST EACH STREET AS A SEPARATE LINE ITEM WITHIN THIS LEGEND. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil • • amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 0. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / /_ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. . . P. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map / /_ approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Q. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, / /_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _/_/_ • 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ . 11 G,H, I ,&J- 158 Project NoSUBTT18819 Completion Date Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. • Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/ /_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. R. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/ /_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall / /_ • be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Lighting • 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. / /_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • 12 G,H, I ,&J- 159 ry Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 4, moo, Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS July 27, 2011 SWC of Etiwanda & Victoria Subdivision SUBTT18819 & DRC2011-00629 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. The private water supply and fire hydrants shall be design in accordance with RCFPD Standard 5-10 and the 2010 California Fire Code. 2. Public water supply and fire hydrants shall be design in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5- 10, the 2010 California Fire Code and the Cucamonga Valley Water District. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project will be determined in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch when the structure size for the development is • known. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FCS-10 Fire Sprinklers All living facilities must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, en submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate thod" form along with supporting documents and payment of the fire review fee. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. G,H, I ,&J- 160 Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Standard #10-5. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a water supply clearance before lumber is dropped on site (except form lumber). 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #14-1. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 4. Annexation: Must be completed PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property,• the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. • G,1-1, I ,&J2 161 RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. DRC2011-00629, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 16 HOMES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18819, THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF 10.6 ACRES INTO 17 LOTS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND VICTORIA STREET,AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, AND 21. A. Recitals. 1. Water Mill Homes filed an application for Development Review DRC2011-00629, the Design Review of Tract No. 18819, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of December 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. • 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. • 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 14, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18819, Development Review DRC2011-00629, Variance DRC2011-00383 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00638; b. The 10.6 acre project is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street,with a street frontage of approximately 490 feet along Etiwanda Avenue and a street frontage of approximately 635 feet along Victoria Street. There is an existing Historic Point of Interest on site, the Johnston House that will be relocated within the project. There are 63 Heritage Trees that will be removed as part of the project, and one tree, a Deodar Cedar will be preserved in place; c. The property to the north, west, and south of the subject site is existing single- family residences, the property to the east is Etiwanda Intermediate School; d. The site is located within the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The lots range in size from 20,281 square feet to 29,099 square feet, with an average lot size • of 22,003 square feet; G,H, I ,&J- 162 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 2 • e. The proposed architectural design is a contemporary representation of Traditional, • Spanish, and Bungalow styles, provided in both single-story and two-story elevations. Of the 16 lots, 7 are single-story 3,800 square foot homes and 9 are two-story 4,150 square foot homes; and f. The project was designed to conform to the development requirements outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan for the Very Low (VL) Residential District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of , the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not • be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative • Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation • Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance G,H, I ,&J- 163 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 3 • with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the design review of 16 homes associated with the development of Tentative Tract 18819, the proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. • 2) The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on August 16, 2011 and addressed the following comments: a) The Committee reviewed the single-story elevations and did not recommend any design changes. b) The Committee reviewed the two-story elevations and recommended the following design modifications: • Traditional — Expand the use of brick siding to enhance the entrance and additional portions of the front elevation. • Bungalow — Incorporate the use of field stone on the front and side elevations. • Spanish—Provide architectural elements at various windows to provide depth to the building plane, additional shadow accents, and elements traditionally utilized in Spanish architecture. Revise the garage door style for consistency with the architectural theme. c) The Committee recommended the installation of 6-foot high solid masonry walls along the local equestrian trail. 3) The Design Review Committee reviewed the revised project on • October 4, 2011 and recommended approval of the plans as presented. Plans submitted for plan check shall be consistent with G,H, I ,&J- 164 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 4 • those plans submitted for Design Review Committee review and approval. • Engineering Department 1) Etiwanda Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Special Collector"and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards, including but not limited to the following: a) . Provide or protect cobble curb and gutter (24 feet west of centerline), asphalt pavement, 8-foot wide sidewalk/bike path, drive approaches,ADA access ramps and street trees per Figure 5-24 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. b) Replace asphalt sidewalk with a Class 1 bike lane a minimum of 8 feet in width per Exhibit III-7 General Bikeways Plan of the City's General Plan. c) Provide (3) 5800 lumen HPSV street lights, as required. d) Protect or provide traffic striping and signage, as required. e) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment in Etiwanda Avenue. • f) Frontage improvements to be made along the Not-A-Part parcel circumscribed by the project. g) The proposed drive approach on Lot 17 shall be per City Std 101, Type C. 2) The developer shall make a good effort to obtain dedication of an additional 4 feet of right-of-way for Etiwanda Avenue from the Not-A- Part parcel in exchange of frontage improvements, including street trees, bike path, cobble curb and gutter and a drive approach to City standards. 3) Victoria Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local Street"and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards, including but not limited to the following: a) Provide or protect curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, ADA access ramps, catch basin and street trees. b) Sidewalk shall be 8 feet wide, as an extension of existing pedestrian trail to the west. Sidewalk shall cross drive approaches at 0" curb face. c) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV street lights, as required. • • G,H, I ,&J- 165 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629— WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 5 • d) Protect or provide traffic striping and signage, as required. • e) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment in Victoria Street. 0 Provide crosswalk at the southeast corner of Victoria Street and Grape Place to the trail on the west. g) Provide advanced warning signs for trail crossing at Victoria Street and Grape Place. 4) Grape Place frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local Street" and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards, including but not limited to the following: • a) Provide or protect curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, catch basins, drive approaches, ADA access ramps and street trees. b) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV street lights, as required. • c) Protect or provide traffic striping and signage, as required. d) Provide drive approaches for local trail access. Driveways that cross trails shall be transverse medium broom finish. • 5) "A" Street improvements to be in accordance with Local Street" and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards, including but not limited to the following: a) Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, catch basin, drive approaches and street trees. b) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV street lights, as required. c) Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. 6) Etiwanda Avenue"sideyard"frontage of Lot 6,which needs to look like a front yard, shall be privately maintained. Rear yard wall shall not extend into the front yard appearing area. Homeowner also needs maintenance access to slopes north of the Not-A-Part parcel. 7) Although part of the project site is within Drainage Area 8 of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area, the plans and Tract 15915 drainage report show drainage going to the Day Creek Channel. General City Drainage Fee shall apply instead of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine one. 8) Tract 15915 installed storm drain facilities that accommodate runoff from this project, including lateral stubs(see City Drawing No. 1695-D). • Incorporate, as much as possible,the drainage facilities anticipated for this project. Revise said drawing to reflect any approved changes. No Reimbursement Agreement is in effect. G,H, I ,&J- 166 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 6 • 9) Etiwanda Avenue side yards will be required to look like front yard and shall be privately maintained. 10) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Victoria Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole west of Etiwanda Avenue to first pole east of Etiwanda Avenue prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Victoria Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. 11) An in-lieu fee as contribution for the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the city prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Victoria Street to the south project boundary. 12) The development requires installation of fiber optics conduits, vaults and manholes on Etiwanda Avenue per City Standard Plans 135-137. Also,the improvement plans need to show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes using Standard Plans 135-137. 13) Show private drainage easement for trail along east side (Lots 7 and • 16). 14) The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 15) Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections may have line of sight plotted as required. 16) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top-of-curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 17) For pads lower than street, driveway shall slope at no more than six percent (6%) for the first 6 feet behind sidewalk. 18) Public improvements plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building • permit issuance. G,H, I ,&J- 167 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 7 • Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. • 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt . is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. G,H, I ,&J- 168 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 8 . • 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 12) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high- • efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning,appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) Heritage trees that are removed shall be replaced on a three-to-one basis with a similar species of a minimum 15-gallon size. 2) Tree planting,when feasible, shall follow the requirements established in the Etiwanda Specific Plan regarding windrow replacement. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or • during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to G,H, I ,&J- 169 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 9 • monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. • 2) Due to the presence of the Johnston House and the former Frost general store, the project site shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist during demolition and grading activities. 3) Following brush/tree stump removal and slab/footing removal (following the demolition of standing structures of the extant buildings/decks/platforms) any grading within 100 feet of the Johnston House (and adjacent buildings) and the former location of the Frost General Store shall be conducted with controlled grading, in no more than 6 inch increments, to allow the archaeologist to accurately observe and monitor grading activities. 4) If previously undocumented cultural resources are identified during earthmoving activities, the nature and significance of the find shall be assessed, construction excavation will be diverted if necessary, and a treatment plan formulated and implemented. 5) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect • or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. • 6) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a G,H, I ,&J- 170 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 10 • qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify,and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. • Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM1p emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding • fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil- G,H, I ,&J- 171 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 11 • stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contactor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. • 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. • 7) To conserve water and to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan, the following measures shall be implemented: • a) The installation of recycled water irrigation systems, i.e. dual distribution systems, is required to allow for future use of recycled water. b) Low flow appliances, i.e. toilets, dishwashers, showerheads, washing machines, etc. shall be installed if provided by the builder. c) A minimum of 50 percent of the landscape palette shall contain drought-resistant species. d) Turf (grass) shall not be used as a landscape feature in the common/public/shared areas; however, turf is allowed in the activity areas(s) in community parks Of any). • e) The quantity of grass/turf shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the landscaped portion in the front yards. There shall be no minimum amount of grass/turf imposed anywhere on the site. 8) The project shall incorporate enough points to be certified in Build-it- Green (builditgreen.org) or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). However, the project does not need to be officially 'certified' to reduce cost associated with the certification. • 9) The project shall incorporate the following measures to reduce energy use: G,H, I ,&J- 172 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 12 a) Plant shade trees within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet • of the west sides of properties. b) All units shall be constructed to be able to easily convert to solar power, i.e. solar ready. c) Photovoltaic cells (solar panels), tankless water heaters, and solar powered water heaters shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option, or installed. d) Each appliance, i.e. washers, dryers refrigerators, stoves, etc. provided by the builder must be Energy Star qualified if an Energy Star designation is applicable for that appliance. 10) The following measures shall be included in the site plan to reduce motor vehicle emissions and to be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan: a) There shall be pedestrian sidewalks on both sides of the streets in the project site. b) The project shall install a Class I Bike Path on the western portion of Etiwanda Avenue adjacent to the project site. c) The project shall contain pedestrian connections to the uses • adjacent to the project site. 11) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 12) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: a) Increased insulation, b) Limit air leakage through the structure, c) Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, d) Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, e) Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, f) Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • g) Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. G,H, I ,&J- 173 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 13 • 13) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: a) Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. b) Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. c) Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets, and waterless urinals/water heaters. d) Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 14) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 15) To conserve water and to be consistent with the City's General Plan • and the California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan, the following measures shall be implemented: a) The installation of recycled water irrigation systems, i.e. dual • distribution systems, is required to allow for future use of recycled water. b) Low flow appliances, i.e. toilets, dishwashers, showerheads, • washing machines, etc. shall be installed if provided by the builder. c) A minimum of 50 percent of the landscape palette shall contain drought-resistant species. d) Turf (grass) shall not be used as a landscape feature in the common/public/shared areas; however, turf is allowed in the activity areas(s) in community parks (if any). e) The quantity of grass/turf shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the landscaped portion in the front yards. There shall be no minimum 16) The project shall incorporate enough points to be certified in Build-it- Green (builditgreen.org) or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). However, the project does not need to be officially • 'certified' to reduce cost associated with the certification. G,H, I ,&J- 174 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 14 • 17) The project shall incorporate the following measures to reduce energy use: a) Plant shade trees within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet • of the west sides of properties. b) All units shall be constructed to be able to easily convert to solar power, i.e. solar ready. c) Photovoltaic cells (solar panels), tankless water heaters, and solar powered water heaters shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option, or installed. d) Each appliance, i.e. washers, dryers refrigerators, stoves, etc. provided by the builder must be Energy Star qualified if an Energy Star. 18) The following measures shall be included in the site plan to reduce motor vehicle emissions and to be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan: a) There shall be pedestrian sidewalks on both sides of the streets in the project site. b) The project shall install a Class I Bike Path on the western • portion of Etiwanda Avenue adjacent to the project site. c) The project shall contain pedestrian connections to the uses adjacent to the project site. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration • program within a specified time frame. G,H, I ,&J- 175 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 15 • • 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by Thielmann Engineers, April 9, 2011 and May 24, 2011,to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan, prepared by Thielmann Engineers, April 9, 2011 and May 24, 2011, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the • storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, • including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by Thielmann Engineers, April 9, 2011 and May 24, 2011,to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit.. Noise 1) The exterior unmitigated noise levels are about 62.8 CNEL, so exterior mitigation measures will not be needed. 2) All exterior building surfaces in the project will be exposed to noise levels of less than 65 CNEL, and therefore will require less than 20.0 • dB exterior to interior noise reduction in order to meet the City's 45 CNEL interior noise standard. All rooms are projected to meet the City's 45 CNEL interior noise standard without building upgrades. • G,H, I ,&J- 176 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 16 • • 3) All buildings exposed to noise levels greater than 57 CNEL will meet the 45 CNEL interior noise level criteria only with windows closed. ' Adequate ventilation with windows closed must be provided per the • applicable California Building Code. 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with • above noise standards or halted. • 6) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. • 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of • 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 2. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: • James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary G,H, I ,&J- 177 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00629 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 17 • I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • • G,H, I ,&J- 178 kipAsk " M COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 50., ` STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2011-00629 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW FOR A 17 LOT SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: WATER MILL HOMES LOCATION: SWC ETIWANDA AVENUE AND VICTORIA STREET APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20 AND 21 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its /_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Tract No.SUBTT18819 is granted subject to the approval of Development Review dRC2011-00629, Variance DRC2011-00383, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011- 00638. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolutions of Approval No.s 11-66 and 11-67, /_/_ Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans(full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The / /_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 2,094.00 • SC-12-08 1 1:1PLANNINGIFINALIPLNGCOMM12011 Res & Stf Rpt1DRC2011-00629 Cond 12-14.doc G,H, 1 ,&J- 179 Project NoDRC2011-00629 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning /_/_• Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 2. The Variance and Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not / /_ issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in'accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/ /_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / /_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/ /_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/ /_• consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all / /_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the _/ /_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination. 10. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed / /_ control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. • • 2 G,H, I ,&J- 180 Project NoDRC2011-00629 Completion Date 11. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles,such as veterinarians _/_/_ or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided • that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 12. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5%at the downstream end of a trail for a distance _/_/_ of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official 13. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local /_/_ Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 14. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District,at least one /_/_ model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing. 15. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, _/_/_ construct minimum 6 foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split- face double sided block, 'slump stone'or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 16. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions(CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine _/ /_ animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 17. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / /_ Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or • prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 18. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / /_ owner, homeowners'association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 19. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling / /_ unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 20. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. Any further modifications to the site /_/_ including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees,demolition, relocation,reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. 21. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all /_/_ lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. • 3 G,H, I ,&J- 181 Project NoDRC2011-00629 Completion Date 22. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property • owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's I perimeter. 23. Construct block walls between homes(i.e.,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 24. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 25. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. / /_ 26. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each /_/_ support post for all wood fences,with a minimum of two Winch lag bolts,to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 27. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. / /_ 28. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to /_/_ maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 29. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The _/_/_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping • including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. • 30. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products. D. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and /_/_ for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, _/_/_ detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for _/_/_ Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design • 4 G,H, I ,&J- 182 Project NoDRC2011-00629 Completion Date and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be • painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 5. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the _/_/_ street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth _/_/_ from back of sidewalk. 2. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. / /_ 3. On flag lots, use a 12-foot driveway within flag to maximize landscape area. / /_ 4. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on _/_/_ this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 5. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and _/ /_ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in / /_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or • prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in /_/_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 _/ /_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. • • • • 5 G,H, I ,&J- 183 Project NoDRC2011-00629 Completion Date 4. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater / /_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as • follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.ft.of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size • shrub per each 100 sq.ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall • include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously /_/_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 6. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development / /_ Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls, landscaping,and sidewalks shall be included in /_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 9. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and /_/_ approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_• Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the project landscape architect shall certify on he submitted plans that the Xeriscape requirements have been met. • 11. New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear /_/_ feet per acre. The size,spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the City's • Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19.08.100). G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special /_/_ Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and 1-15 Freeways _/ /_ in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation _/ /_ measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. • • 6 • G,H, I ,&J- 184 Project NoDRC2011-00629 Completion Date 4. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of /_/_ the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and • exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 5. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of$557 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 6. In those instances requiring long term monitoring(i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy),the _/_/_ applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. H. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location /_/_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, OR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: OTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/_/_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., SUBTT#, SUBTPM#, DRC#)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. • 7 G,H, I ,&J- 185 Project NoDRC2011-00629 Completion Date 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/_/_• 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. J. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be /_/_ marked with the project file number(i.e., SUBTT18819 AND DRC2011-00629). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes,ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant _/ /_ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/ /_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. • K. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. / /_ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. / /_ 4. The homes must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D. / /_ L. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. • 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to /_/_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the /_/_ time of application for grading plan check. • 8 G,H, I ,&J- 186 • Project NoDRC2011-00629 Completion Date 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building • permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. • 6. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall /_/_ occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from _/_/_ street centerline): 44 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue _/_/_ 30 total feet on Victoria Street / /_ 25 total feet on Grape Place / /_ 50 total feet on Street"A" _/_/_ 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / /_ 3. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the _/_/_ final map. • —4. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, / / community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas,street trees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. • Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. N. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos, landscaped _/ /_ areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source /_/_ of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. • 9 . • G,H, I ,&J- 187 Project NoDRC2011-00629 Completion Date 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: _/ /_ Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike • Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Etiwanda Avenue (f) X X X X X (e) • Victoria Street X X X X X X (e) Grape Place X X X X X (e) • Street"A" X X X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e)Access Ramps (f) Cobble Curb and Gutter. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights /_/_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/ /_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit,and _/ /_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/_/_ • project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals,and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/ /_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / /_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. Acash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / /_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan / /_ check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program. • 10 G,H, I ,&J- 188 Project NoDRC2011-00629 • Completion Date 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed _/_/_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street • improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Etiwanda Avenue Eucalyptus Silver Dollar Gum 5' 40' 15 Fill polyanthemos O.C. GAL In Victoria Street Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 5' 50" 15 Fill O.C. GAL In Grape Place Quercus ilex Holly Oak 6' 55' 15 Fill O.C. GAL In Street"A" SELECT APPROPRIATE TREE FROM THE APPROVED STREET TREE LIST FOR RANCHO CUCAMOGNA. LIST EACH STREET AS A SEPARATE LINE ITEM WITHIN THIS LEGEND. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. • 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 0. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting /_/_ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. P. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map / /_ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Q. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas, /_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / /_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from • 11 G,H, I ,&J- 189 Project NoDRC2011-00629 Completion Date the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential • projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. /_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. R. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/ /_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall / /_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. / /_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. • • APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 12 • G,H, I ,&J- 190 City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18819 a Building & Safety Department • !�j-�� 10500 Civic Center Dr. SAW Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • GRADING COMMITTEE PROJECT REPORT& RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: SUBTT18819 Type: 17 lot residential subdivision Location: Southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street Planning Department: TOM GRAHN APN: Meeting Date: August 16, 2011 By: Matthew Addington , Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx No: �/►� • If NO, see COMMENTS below: PRELIMINARY: GRC: August 16, 2011 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: PC Meeting: By: Note: Building and Safety—Grading will review and comment on future submittals for this project. A) STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. • 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of . California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3) A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a Califomia licensed Civil Engineer. 6) The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. • I:IBUILDINGIPERMITS1SUBiT188191SUBTT 18819 Grading Committee Project Report 20110816.doc 1 of 5 • City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18819 1Building&Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 % T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8) A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports.shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows • in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site • • construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 13) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 14) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 15) The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16) The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 17) This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. ' 18) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit'. 19) Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by • 1:1 8UILDINGIPERMITS\SUBTT18819\SUBTT18819 Grading Committee Project Report 20110816.doc 2 of 5 City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18819 ir �� Building &Safety Department 7r 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 III M T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; • iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be • reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 20) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. B) COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: 1) Please note that at this conceptual level a review of the accessibility access is not performed. It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. 2) The drainage on the east side of lots 7 and 16 appears to be draining against an existing or proposed masonry wall. This will cause an erosive condition to the horse trail. If drainage occurs across tots (i.e. from Lot 7 onto Lot 16), the drainage must either be in a concrete pipe or a concrete channel. Either the concrete pipe or concrete channel must be within a dedicated drainage easement for the lot accepting the drainage (i.e. Lot 16). Please adjust the design along the east equestrian trail accordingly. • 1:1BUILDING IPERMITSISUBTr188191SUBTr18819 Grading Committee Project Report 20110816.doc 3 of 5 City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18819 sees" Building 8 Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 %a T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • C) SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit for any underground water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMPs). 2) The site shalt be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. • 3) The applicant shall process a grading and drainage plan through the Building and Safety Official to eliminate cross-lot drainage from Lot 7 prior to final map approval. 4) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 5) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. • 6) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 7) In the equestrian trails water bars shall be spaced accordingly: Equestrian Trail Slope Water Bar Interval Spacing 4% to 5.99% 50-feet 6% to 8.99% 40-feet 9%to 11.99% 30-feet 12% and greater 20-feet 8) The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. • Lt BUILDING'PERMRS\SUBTT188191SUBTi18819 Grading Committee Project Report 20110816.doc 4 of 5 `""c' City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18819 Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 so T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • • D) WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. • 2) An updated Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was not submitted tote Building and Safety Services Department for review. The WQMP will need to be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit. 3) A WDID number must be provided prior to final approval of the WQMP and issuance of the grading permit. 4) The following comments are from the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Thielmann Engineers dated April 9, 2011/May 24, 2011 has been reviewed and deemed "Substantially Complete" dated June 28, 2011. The following corrections are required prior to the final approval of the WQMP: Page Section Item A-5 1.3 Please show the receiving waters on Exhibit"B". • A-7 2.2 2"1 request: Please add the proper title for this section and reformat as necessary. A-13 3.2 In the matrix "Justification for Source Control BMP's not incorporated in the project WQMP" a reference is made to the "San Bernardino County Flood Control District" catch basin stenciling requirements. Please provide the wording of the county requirements for review and approval by the City Public Works Services Department. A-20 6 • • The City of Rancho Cucamonga "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan Agreement"; the following items may be added to the agreement: • Prepared By— please add the engineering company here which prepared this document • Include the SUBTT and DRC file numbers in Section C. • 1:1 BUILDING\PERMITSISUBTT18819\SUBTT18819 Grading Committee Project Report 20110816.doc 5of5 • RESOLUTION NO. 11-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2011-00383 TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM AVERAGE LOT SIZE AND THE MINIMUM LOT DEPT REQUIREMENT FOR 1 LOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF 10.6 ACRES INTO 17 LOTS THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND VICTORIA STREET AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, AND 21. A. Recitals. 1. Water Mill Homes filed an application for the issuance of Variance No. DRC20011-00383 as described in the title of this Resolution, Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of December 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. •NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 14, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18819 and Development Review DRC2011-00629; b. The application applies to property located'at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street,with a street frontage of approximately 490 feet along Etiwanda Avenue and a street frontage of approximately 635 feet along Victoria Street; c: The property to the north, west, and south of the subject site is existing single- family residences, the property to the east is Etiwanda Intermediate School; . d. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is the Very Low (VL) • Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan; G,H, I ,&J- 191 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-68 VARIANCE DRC2011-00638 - WATER MILL HOMES • December 14, 2011 Page 2 e. The applicant is proposing the subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots ranging in size from 20,181 square feet to 29,099 square feet. The Variance request is for a reduction in the minimum average lot size from 25,000 to 22,003 square feet; and f. The applicant is proposing the reduction in the minimum lot depth requirement for Lot 17 from 200 feet to 96 feet. The design of this property and the future relocation of the Johnston House will be compatible with the setbacks established by the adjacent Pearson House, a local Historic Landmark. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The subject property is an infill property bounded by public streets that separate the project site from neighboring residential equestrian properties. The applicant is proposing an average lot size of 22,003 square feet and all 17 lots are larger than the 20,000-square foot minimum lot size; lots range in size from 20,181 square feet to 29,099 square feet. The proposed subdivision configuration achieves the principal goal of creating an equestrian • subdivision compatible with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the adjoining equestrian community, augments the equestrian trail system, and allows the applicant to address the preservation of a cultural resource. The applicant is proposing a reduction in the lot depth requirement from 200 feet to 96 feet for Lot 17, which will provide for the relocation of the Johnston House, a local Historic Point of Interest. Although theproposed lot depth reduction is a significant modification, the design far exceeds the lot width requirement resulting in a 22,501 square foot lot that is consistent with the design of the balance of the subdivision. The design of Lot 17 will also be consistent with that of an adjacent Historic Landmark, the Pearson House. Additionally, the application proposes the relocation of the Johnston House to Lot 17, maintaining its current solar orientation. This will also require matching the front and rear setbacks of Johnston House to the Pearson House, which provides a 40-foot front yard setback (20 feet behind the front property line) and 25 feet from the rear property line. b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. The proposed project is an in-fill subdivision, bounded by a Historic Landmark, existing single-family residences, and local streets. The location of these existing improvements and the presence of the Johnston House, establish exceptional conditions that limit the design options of the proposed subdivision, while also trying to meet development standard requirements. The proposed subdivision configuration will substantially meet the development standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, while also providing the opportunity for preservation of a local cultural resource. Additionally, the lot configuration for the proposed relocation of the Johnston House will be identical to those established by the existing and adjacent Pearson House. c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would • deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. G,H, I ,&J- 192 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-68 VARIANCE DRC2011-00638 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 3 • With the exception of the minimum average lot size and minimum lot dept requirement, the proposed subdivision was designed to meet all applicable development standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed subdivision provides for the development of homes that will be architecturally compatible with surrounding properties, in a home size compatible with surrounding properties, and provide the potential for equestrian use consistent with surrounding properties. The applicant has designed the subdivision to provide the maximum average lot size achievable within the constraints of the property and a strict interpretation and enforcement of the minimum average lot size requirement would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the district. Additionally, the lot configuration for the proposed relocation of the Johnston House will be identical to those established by the existing and adjacent Pearson House. d. That the granting of the Variance not will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. The applicant has designed the subdivision to provide the maximum average lot size achievable within the constraints of the.property and creates an equestrian community compatible with adjacent developments. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the district because the configuration of the proposed subdivision is compatible with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and achieves the goal of preserving buildings of potential historic significance. e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The granting of the Variance will allow the proposed project to achieve the goals of relocating and preserving the • Johnston House and creating an equestrian community compatible with the surrounding developments. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity because the development of this in-fill parcel will not require an extension of City infrastructure/services and preserves a resource of potential historic significance. Additionally, the lot depth reduction and relocation of the Johnston House will be compatible with the development standards of the adjoining Pearson House. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all • comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; G,H, I ,&J- 193 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-68 VARIANCE DRC2011-00638 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 4 and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department • 1) Approval is for a reduction in the minimum average lot size from 25,000 to 22,003 for the proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. 2) Approval is for the reduction in minimum lot depth requirement for Lot 17 from 200 to 96 feet and reduced setback dimensions for the proposed subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089- 081-16, 17, 20, and 21. 3) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18819, Development Review DRC2011-00629, and Tree Removal Permit • DRC2011-00638 shall apply. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • G,H, I ,&J- 194 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-68 VARIANCE DRC2011-00638 —WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 5 • • BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary • I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • • G,H, I ,&J- 195 RESOLUTION NO. 11-69 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2011-00638, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 63 HERITAGE TREES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF 10.6 ACRES INTO 17 LOTS IN THE VERY LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND VICTORIA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1089-081-16, 17,20, AND 21. A. Recitals. 1. Water Mill Homes filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit No. DRC2011-00638, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of December 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning • Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on December 14, 2011, including written and oral staff reports,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18819, Development Review DRC2011-00629, and Variance DRC2011-00383; b. The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street,with a street frontage of approximately 490 feet along Etiwanda Avenue and a street frontage of approximately 635 feet along Victoria Street; c. The properties to the north, west, and south of the subject site are existing single- family residences, the property to the east is Etiwanda Intermediate School; d. The trees are not designated as historically significant; e. The trees are not specifically noted in the Etiwanda Specific Plan per Figure 5-13; f. The applicant has submitted an arborist report assessing the health of the • individual trees. The report observes that the trees range in health between being in generally good condition to being in need of removal; G,H, I ,&J- 196 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-69 TRP DRC2011-00638—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 2 g. It is necessary to remove the trees in order to grade the project site, construct single-family residences, and associated improvements such as streets and equestrian trails which will allow economic enjoyment of the property; h. It is not necessary to remove trees to construct required improvements within a flood control or utility right-of-way; i. The trees can not be preserved by pruning and proper maintenance or relocation rather than removal; and j. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource of the City. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; b. The proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; c. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and • d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds • that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the G,H, I ,&J- 197 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-69 TRP DRC2011-00638—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 3 • Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, • Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. • • Planning Department 1) Approval is for the removal of 63 trees in conjunction with a proposed • subdivision of 10.6 acres into 17 lots the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street. APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20, and 21. 2) Section 19.08.100 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires that all heritage trees be replaced on a one-for-one basis, not less than 15-gallon size. 3) Heritage trees that are removed shall be replaced on a three-to-one basis with a similar species of a minimum 15-gallon size. • 4) Tree planting, when feasible, shall follow the requirements established in the Etiwanda Specific Plan regarding windrow replacement. 5) The replacement trees shall be planted on the same lot as the trees that are being removed. 6) The existing Deodar Cedar, within Lot 17 of the proposed subdivision, shall be preserved in place and shall be enclosed by an appropriate construction barrier, such as chain link fence, prior to the issuance of • any grading or building permit and prior to the commencement of work. a) Fences are to remain in place during all phases of construction • and may not be removed without the written consent of the Planning Director until construction is complete. • G,H, I ,&J- 198 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-69 TRP DRC2011-00638—WATER MILL HOMES December 14, 2011 Page 4 • b) No substantial disruption or removal of the structural or absorptive roots shall be performed. c) No fill material shall be placed within the drip line. d) No substantial compaction of the soil within the drip line shall be undertaken. e) No construction, including structures and walls, that disrupts the root system shall be permitted. 7) This permit shall be valid for a period of 90 days, unless an extension is requested in writing at least 14 days prior to the expiration date. Where this permit is associated with development, the effective date begins and the 90 days shall start from the date of final map recordation or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. • 8) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18819, Development Review DRC2011-00629, and Variance DRC2011-00383 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011. • PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R.Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • G,H, I ,&J- 199 9' \ STAFF REPORT Cr,PLANNING DEPARTMENT L RANCHO Date: December 14, 2011 CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner Subject: DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE STATUS REPORT AND REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES BACKGROUND: The Planning Department has completed our review of the administrative draft of the Development Code, making changes and seeking input from various departments across the City including Building and Safety, Code Enforcement, Engineering Services, Fire and the Redevelopment Agency to ensure that all aspects of development are considered in the new Code. On November 17, 2011, we sent our edits to the consultant, PMC, and they are in the process of drafting the Public Draft Development Code for public review in January. • On October 5, November 2, and December 7, 2011, staff presented three planned reports to the Council to give a preview of the changes that are coming to the Development Code ahead of the Public Draft. In this final report, staff has highlighted some key changes that are proposed to the Code as it relates to signs and green building. SIGNS: Policy LU-11.1 of the General Plan includes updating the Sign Code as needed to maintain well designed signs throughout the City. The City has always prided itself on maintaining a high quality visual environment through effective sign regulations. Changes proposed in the new Code will balance the need for increased flexibility in the number and placement of signs for economic development while maintaining a positive visual aesthetic. Changes to the Code will also reflect limitations in the regulation of signs consistent with the First.Amendment and State law. There are two fundamental changes to our existing sign regulations; first, sign regulations have been separated into two sections — Signs on public property and signs on private property. It is based on the premise that, as property owner, the City has greater control and authority over the types of signs that may be placed on public property. Second, the current Code limits signs to "minimal information only," which is inconsistent with the First Amendment and State law. Going forward, sign messages will only be evaluated based on whether the message is considered "commercial" or "non-commercial." Here is an overview of the proposed changes to the regulation of permanent signs: • For monument signs, the number of allowed tenants has been increased from three to • four per face. In addition, the identifying name of the shopping center will no longer count as one of the "tenants" and will be calculated separately. Item K CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE STATUS REPORT AND REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES December 14, 2011 Page 2 • • Menu/Order boards for drive through establishments have been increased from one to two. • Signs in industrial areas can now be illuminated. • For establishments that have subtenants (i.e. grocery stores), one sign will be allowed for each subtenant. • For office buildings, signs are no longer required to be directly adjacent to the tenant space, but can be located in more visible locations on the building face. • Electronic message signs are prohibited on private property, except for gas station pricing signs. Existing signs are grandfathered. Here is an overview of the proposed changes for temporary signs: • The requirement that temporary signs be for specific events (i.e. grand opening, change of ownership, or a sales event) has been removed. • Temporary signs can now be posted for a maximum of 90 days, either consecutive or intermittent, based on business preference. In the current Code, signs can be displayed for different lengths of time depending on the type of sign. Breaks between display periods are no longer required. If a business has a specific need for more that 90 days of display time in any one calendar year, they can apply for a Conditional Use Permit. • Businesses will now have three choices for the type of temporary sign they want to • display: wall banner, ground mounted banner or flag sign. GREEN BUILDING: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has made significant commitments to sustainability and wants to encourage sustainable development within the City. The adoption of the California Green Building Code (CalGreen) was a first step to ensure that the built environment is water and energy efficient. We have developed a green building chapter in the new Code that is built from the foundation of CalGreen. All buildings will be required to meet the mandatory elements of CalGreen, but for those wanting to increase the sustainability of a development, they can choose from the optional measures available, which are assigned a point value. Depending on the number of points they achieve, a project may be eligible for development incentives. By using CalGreen as the basis for our green building chapter, the City works with previously established standards that are updated regularly and implemented state-wide, avoiding the risk of developing an independent program that may become obsolete in a few years as construction technology changes. As CalGreen changes their requirements over time, we will be able to modify our program with the same changes, thus avoiding 'reinventing the wheel." CONCLUSION: The changes proposed in the new Development Code are designed to make the Code easy to use for staff, businesses and the development community. The proposed changes to signs will make it easier for businesses to advertise in Rancho Cucamonga, while maintaining our commitment to a pleasant visual environment. By using the synergy already created in the • K2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE STATUS REPORT AND REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES December 14, 2011 • Page 3 CalGreen Code, our Green Building Code provides flexibility for developers and gives us a competitive advantage in the Inland Empire for future economic growth. Resp-ctfully ubmitted, 1 4 Jam R.R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT/JN/Is • • • K-3 / I / rY' CD CCU I 0 t o N , U 1 < oD E E ° a 0 - 0 a) r I) Q .p. 4 ' v try 'r 1.-:. 4+ ern .s.' i a cbil 1. ii a • : a' w < . n. .+.nY 4,' /' 1 J1; r' .4.) ( N • O • ,-- V �--{ 1 N ��., :a4 L.,• Ct ti !, CI . p.., p titi C) t).0 v o a < 0 0 aQ I 0 l` N , ; E It ' • � ,.0 bb ;-; • •0 C) Ct a 0 0 - Q I r � N I C 0 o o V1 0 O O - O C • � et -" 0 N �- ' v P"i ; � o O O C) E • � U 0 � bn bb ip O N bOc � < tZ • I I I I I I i • f` a t * , n fF Y . C WYJ Y / fi f )/' O • 1--4 !J • 0 ''C 0 0 �,�// 4-.bA C W N > ct CA • H � �' ct O 2 ° �v) • • cu o tip p ra V) r--e +, by E E - P-li '-'q u A-42 . rt 0 0 o ct v) 71-4 V p O ct . c, U • tA Il cor 0 0 2. a -"t'‘: l' ra. a - i ,/ , ad ct j' • ' . ,-.., CLI (' • O a� 0 '-� , 1 P4 !: to U :-r' il gn ° c 1) ;6 0 cC4 to cZ 0 0 , t � .- r T U w Ct • 4 'd E + —0 p 0 g < p o ti ,;' a.0 k o j t, 2:I ch. d liTv i -- T_i ,A c', a .; . ,ye s 'K ' I , r+ ut Po • i■II U ri; • CI) c+0-+ Q-( O cal LI o h 3 '4 O - -- . I ` v O• I E ct Zj bo ,..,.. ‘_( cu N 1 . 1.) ;_i O Ct 0 +' Q'+ � N 0 0 o - O 0 c.) 0 cn h.4 O ; o � � Ct Ct . � � � � Ct . 0 c I I I I I I a • • • W c;, " 1 • I \•� , / /, t vi f Crt^ VI U C tin V Cl) ct o — ap bA o - , 7.11 E aA v • v- � � • ri N° a) PO to -4 � '� t - v) 0 0 (1.) s-4 C `t U > > N Q) N O tj ; 1 p'� 0 E o � Nc; 4--+ M a) C' 7--4 • I I t adi ""' • E bA U -9 r-' N O ;it, U Cto 0Z CZ ago ■ i 1 v `i M Y ILY[ .. k jy I a ';,LA pfrrJ; ry .. _. /fJr, I N U U >, E ,- Lt Cl.) • , U • O � VD • ,-a ;, o o e, a, ct t C • °O • j 0 U -� QCD }}' w1 I) ., • ,› bj) — • ) Cl) Ct . t �C czt ct �, ,� O _ N C) t� U � , � N U U U E •• S4 o 7d O � 0 $ YKY i E iY %r. 'c. C`-• • • O v • • H a • . • � 1 at /,• _ _� • J . GEORGE CHU , AICP, LEED AP December 14, 2011 • Chairman Munoz and Members of Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive, P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 . Subject: DRC 2011-00255 (All State Recycling-Whittram Yard, Development Design Review) All State Paper and Metal Recycling (All State) currently operates two facilities and employs a total of 42 employees between two facilities. The subject Whittram Avenue facility receives, handles, processes and transports ferrous scrap metal which has been in operation since 1987. The Etiwanda Avenue facility receives, handles, processes and transport recycled papers, plastic, aluminum, copper and serves as main office which was added-on in 1997. All State is serving local recycling needs and contributing tens thousands of sales taxes to the City on every year. Its facilities have been servicing local residents and commercial recycling needs. Its existence and operation have helped the City meeting the mandate of California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) and achieving target programs as required by State Assembly 939 (AB 939) and Senate Bill 1016 (SB 1016) and continue to help the City minimizing waste generation and increase recycling rate. On behalf of All State, we appreciate professionalism of all involved staffs for preparing a very thorough review and analysis of this project. All State agreed with all stipulated conditions of approval except the following two conditions. The first one: Item No.5 of Planning Department which requires construction of 558 feet of 8-foot high tan precision block wall along the south property line adjacent to the railroad right-of-way. Request for permission to install metal fence instead of block wall along railroad track The second one: Item No. 5 of Engineering Department which requires overhead utility undergrounding in-lieu fees $ 87,053.57 to be paid prior to issuance of building permit Request for permission to pay in-lieu fees $ 30,671.40 for All States owned parcels prior to issuance of building permit and to pay in-lieu fees for leased parcels upon acquisition of leased parcels (see attached breakdown of in-lieu fees). The following justifications highlight reasons for requesting modification of those two above-mentioned conditions of approval. Justifications for the first condition (Item No. 5 of planning condition): A. The metal fence is a permissible material in industry zone area.All State is proposing re- usage of heavy duty steel metal plate (4'x20' panel) for quality and durability of perimeter fencing. —2— December 14,2011 B. The City 2010 General Plan is encouraging"Green" and "Sustainable" Development in the City. The usage of steel metal material and design are promoting the desirable City policy and goal as listed in the Chapter 6 of Resource Conservation: Low-Impact Materials,Low Design Impact, Quality and Durability, Design for Re-use and Recycling and Renewability C. The metal will be located along the rail road track which is not visible to general public except limited number of Metro train passengers travelling on high speed. The metal fence will be painted with earth tone color to tone down the industrial-look. D. The installation of metal fence will generate much less construction impact on the adjacent railroad right-of-way. The steel panels will be welded to steel metal post at spacing of 20 feet of center. The impacted footprints would be isolated and limited to 30" diameter for concrete footing of metal post on every 20 feet in length. Justifications for the second condition (Item No. 5 of engineering condition): A. All State agreed to improve the entire Whittram street frontage of 558.14'which included two owned parcels, one out parcel and three leased parcels for the sake of public interests. B. All States agreed to install three (3) new street lights and two (2) public fire hydrants on the south side of Whittram Avenue for general welfare and public safety. C. Financial hardship: All State has so far invested hundreds of thousands dollars on governmental processing and consulting fees since January of this year. They are required to spend another few hundreds of thousand dollars to upgrade and complete all required on-site and off-site improvements in the next few months. The demand for scrap metal has been slowing down. The increasing project development cost has reaching a break point for this small family-owned business to continue its operation in the City. The ultimate development cost for this scrap metal yard alone is anticipated to exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000) within a very short period of time. D. It was City's wish and All State's intent to prioritize resource toward the improvement of the frontage of Whittram Avenue. All State is fully committed to allocate resource to install the split- face block wall on Whittram at the earliest possible date. Based on the above-mentioned justifications, we sincerely request Planning Commission approving modification of these two conditions of approval. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, J. George Chu,AICP, LEED AP On behalf of All State Recycling 718 WEST 16TH STREET, UPLAND CA 91784 PHONE.: 909-322-5134 JGEORGECHU @YAHOO.COM O O W O CO IA r-i IA C O• IN LI1 H N M LL O O LL_E O \ nA en O D E V) ton V r+ Q N N h O 0 t..6 1O M N CO - N VT N v m e el W WI n v m o ni .= tO .d N M v1 CO m CO o to to' N.' 10 o o to , • .. 00 LA N N N co 00 ttOO el N CA 00 tD e4 h M Ln m O n La n -O O p b V1 N N V R e el IA N .n-I CO 'a 'a o .-I to to CO IN LA - m ."I CA r v el 9 ni _ o ut N m CO m y n to Al to n N m m o m ri .-I Ln 0 01 N "'I a Vl V) Ill N m N Co 1A Vf 4.4 0- 01 .-t el O Al N N O) o E c 0 N al co in 71 O O O O O co 7 LL O Lit N 0 0 .-! 0 7 iu a vi n n O in n N N m 01 e m ?i f O Ol N LA to m o -! 0! N m C d O e Ln ni N O O N H N o m ey e in.•"I N N O VT a 00 >.O N C -o No 0. 7 in 0 O v I.00 -I I- 0 0 0 0 0 ar c Ql co to Ill 0 o E C 'O vi AZ r o vi 0 C In N N N ttoo m " N 9>' N .1 N N N Al o M 0 co 5 Q M 01 en 0 N to N .4- al e1 N ni Y 01 OO N H N ~ N h CL 0 O 10 d 0. a I. «° 0 o m In 00 e el o CA 0 In O ° co N rt CA m « E in N N 0 W N N e~rI W ONt p W VI _ H N .-I N e n M c O. N r m ti n N H N N N 0. to W N V! to N 0 C • 0 00 a 5 • o a ti 7 O w 01 01 N Ln N m o a ll ro 1.1 I m m 0 0 en 01 V IN u CC - .-I .4 0 US N • Al ID O1 N Q N N N M to en N O. J ea R O O In Q it- -1 N O c N 0.1 N N G1 > 41 N ID I- v N rl = It" to O1 N .0 N 10 ro 46 N Q C V IS LL LL fO 01 '0 f O CZ p. N Z N L3 LL U a OU m a° N N co F? W Q N v J6 W U - 1- N Q J IS Page 1 of 1 Van der Zwaag, Tabe From: George Chu [jgeorgechu @yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 5:16 PM To: Van der Zwaag, Tabe Cc: Henderson, Larry; James, Dan; Cambare, Carlo-Angelo Subject: All State Recycling: DRC2011-00254 &2011-00255 Attachments: DRC2011-00254&00255 in-lieu fees.pdf; ASLettertoPlanningCommission2011.1214a.pdf Tabe, I appreciate you and Larry meeting me on the urgent issue regarding to intended installation of mobile modular for truck scale monitor and computer equipment at Whittram facility. All State plan to install a mobile modular (12' x 40 in size') on the south edge of the truck scale. The mobile modular will house one truck scale monitor and computer equipments. We will include the proposed mobile modular on the revised site plan and provide mobile . modular floor plan and elevations for City review. Please accept this email as All State's written request for continuation of Items E & F on Planning Commission Agenda, 12/14/11. Please forward the attachments to responsible staffs and members of Planning Commission for review and consideration. Thank you J. George Chu, AICP, LEED AP on behalf of All State Recycling 909-322-5134 le le /Lasis. 12/14/2011 SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING December 14, 2011 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS -Dim/ -Gtr3i. 14C /41 1" 3c et1,,..Anoct, be, /asad.0�9,. 911or /9/',C <Z,J4C /e-c.J 9%�� � g04/15 c -- 6g54. etiv vNe R -mot 21-mss I l 3 -7-44 /44/1 d. '1 a.,,/,/,,, y A6(-44-,_->i /Z/y/// �" f r • r A*..N l�i CI. )1 , 1 111; -� - �� • _ ., F i 7 •r 4 �a ° R r J + .""r +Y/y ,„!...444,- o yi d °. r 4-1 1.,?4,,• 1 '' ',' ±•'_ter n,. j;..".. .r. _=°•,p P. •47n -.. 'A li„,,,,,:, , .- ', '`=-. , ''', ." '-,:*1-4,„tt, . '' . . I ;i"::_ii. .., *A . • 'I'1.'1., • . re -, , ' p, II . ..1.4 -'* ''..,..,. -...v—. 4,)4j • \ i I7y.�'T,,'/r 1 afor°` • ,, kill 1r I • / 9y 7 Y �jy t• ' .-.\ `,`!+ +?':1 kl .4", JI'. > it ' t,.44S',11-. tit'p Si •s. `1 v.",;•,:.;::1•61-''.',:,ypf • YI t e N,ry 1 , r 414E '.'"f , i r... .. i• A f ; ` 1 n ? aA d� • `1 r� t •'11*t r k r t, .. +y •� ` f i �►' t,! 1 � 5' tif: . A : 4 . i xi: , , fit 1,,..�' rl�,; ,,t • .....a. 1,',..ila V _... _ "IP'. ! � / ,. fi ,} $ r. ..!"4. '' h 4, r1..II' , J #n t'xrrT � • . (, / +s Wi Y R� $ ' .Y j � ��1 1> _ . ..riet, , } r, a , , fi � 1 -4 ' ,.'"- a tr i �, r . , 11#4 -. ,. 1 11 , >.'•`c .�1 , am' ... •; I I' �1 C .4,1:' n ' ' • $ 1, S, 6t 1 .-ti, ' 4•, t/ i. '1dsi `' 1 J f .. D Y•> /� ;.-7 . t,'.• - C• IJ r I W I . , 1. •1. "I • ..,' ''-- li ,, _ 1,• "•` T . ' / / 71'02.`,.^,..e if l•y .r e '') \ ' 4,_'3 -.''',.it . ; i '4, 1.' ,. .6,.1•1.411..-.i.t," :4 1. .„ • t',. •.'„ ,klif\ . •*••• ..! r-I'''•' .. \f`4.., '',-,k• :,40::',/.,‘ ,,. ..., r V., •‘I.'• ,• f (+ : • ; • A 4, . .. 1 1., • S� r i 'yi 4. / t� 1,t� t ...... ',t J ' 1 J. 1 t• �� ; '1''''..:‘1,: . +, ' ? :1. iwJ';T�>T ,4 ~ter - ',1 4 ' i 's • 1 I t-, a7 ••, ri:I I T• .a'V J 11. r ... >t' M' N 4 • 'f , J��^ 14yyyI���1�ryq�. . . ,1 . .. 7 7'741' ''" -•-2..•"•^f' ••' .A - 0•141144 '!1• 7,1,..:Nrkleal." A.•OZ+,..L.*:;, •'; ' -4 ' : -.. .,..1•1„;,•,..•' 7.•L,...,,.. -- ----- -I,a ',•; •.•'.. ,- -f...- _:.#4,-L -, --___,•.•--, TA ' , •.4 r-;.). . .. • .-. - •/,•;•...•. ..":' --.."-..•Itf ' :r`■•:',■Ar.,11:1' • .7":"--••• • 404,, ""-,•---•••:. • „.a.1 ,; 7 .. f 1, . . ,• ,,,. 1• /,'„,',10, , .,•,S•.■;• 40 9. .•.' ' • • ' .1.4...44.•`. r •, ' ".•••■Millaf.'. . ..-P AP' -•. ..-:--L--.:••5 -7i;•,Y'.: ..' A‘, -N,..8. ..4.....'.1,, ,' ..,‘... .,. !.,'..',,"t ia )11,f.( 1 ;,..s.'.. 4 • - w'-`... _.'.11.iy.770-. '. 4. :?'.•g''•:,)1 ' i;•1,'*i 17,''."..',-,• '''.'::" •••,.:::.' „ ,„ . , „otv,„. _ ... , , • , .. . e ',..;1. ,./ • op,"/ !:-.. ,`", ..;.,/,.. •;,.,',...:„;401.1.:, ..:4,....,,14 0,-, -• 17 7. . , ., 4...- ." ..,1..,''i, . ;. !i.i.ot,,a% .'.."!.1,... . .N 4 ',.•• -•. ....!.... ...,;.,v, ,•,.,....ki. •/;7,-, ' „% ..10,--m, 144, t.,(11. A.A1'.1.2. .• 'd ••‘1'. ) • •• 4"•'•••••114R4 ,•.--1, -,I, • . .• ...,-• .,-.• 7 . ei ,,,, ,-: .. .----.... . .1-..,-,,,,,,,,.:,.•,...,.. ,......,.. ,,,,,,„,.),.--.......,„.• ..,. ,„ ,.. . ., .. . ,..•. „L. ,.. , ''.:- f• I":a .•'4"..,,:ivt. ' t-..•: i:' 4::: 2-f‘..''''' 'fr...44/,'''•441%... ' ', '■ ," •:44,. •' •.- ' ..;... '' • %., .. -...,: • ■ . . 01,,,,.., ••■ ......„.„4. •-•' -• j,k.,..--...t. ,,... •,S.,.r , • ..,.. • .. -.... ., • . • ...........09 _....., • •I 1. ,. ' -... 11::1". ••„ • , • ',7 • i .n..1"4,/....• r.• Q 1 - ■. - e,\..!'. i- . ..1 '';', V... r••''. t‘. ... 4 • 't,•.,, .. / . .,1: IL • e , I. : . ' .0 I 1,.. I,"IV. i e .r.7.•;,•' r ! ., .r.? 1•• ... :.,... . '..• P ' r."' •41,. ';,. :.., ' ,• • .71,11141t....._' /•■ ..,,,....;;;,z , '••■••••••••, ' ....:.• , . , 1 ''').. '' '... ' 0 •: ' ill ••' • ' • ' '' .'' 1.• '•• --"•••4.• - ..14.4""*" . Itb•••• ii'i'• '4- '-'.,,'/..d. ' . ' •1 •• .. . • . 4 . • 4.4. .....N...,.... • _ , ' .••••••-.-;-.1a.i.V'41••• .1/4- • - •"1-•••\ .S.`1.s....•,,,,-,'.;‘,•,/ ,,.„.....:•.4 rt,'";,•"7 lir --•,, ..'..4 l'I.::1•' ....0...3■1)...... SO°. ti. •.,...•■•, •A'' 't#i ....'4. ir -. . , ... ... ' •:411 4" 't" 01: i• .,'''''61• .4 a',‘1*.t! . °.:V*,,tj`ii• ', '` I'‘ ••' • S,„2.•/' '■' . A, ..' V ' •',. ' V•••■;. . ' - t ,•.,...,I ',/. ,.,I61, . ,, • , , , ,r, ,, ..,,I, J, .4.•'- ; .i.4,., ' '' . ,\,,, •.,?;11, : ••.. w, %I '.18 1 ., '' • '-. . -,,./:5 •,,., . s•/(.. '. '•Pi,t)/:?,;.# . . .„, r '1../i /.;# ',,Iliti. I. .i A • i : • ,,.,• .f, '• , •A. •Ifr .c I 0 •1.:i!■, • •'.)‘..'''''' . . • • / \ •4'44, , • .,. ., .• • ‘,' .1 ir -1 . ''..• '•■• ' ,. ,,....-A,N. ...\:. .• , .„. r,.0/ ,,1 . ••. 4., • • ,I. ••P' f,..:t 7.i''/'' y: ,...,,roi:J ':.1% '.. .`..;. '..1r '. -N‘.44. '",:- ,/. .,..,,_. - .,,, /,:. •,..., ,,,.....,..,4, . .. , ... • 'i ,,A,./.;lit - • eJs, vi .L. '\,, it\. ''' , ...‘711/4S"...,, .., .1 '- .;1 ' ,.'''kf ! . ',y4.1•.' .'' .‘ •., .. .. ' .,I. • ....0.' •'-'.'# r.4••' . ....).• l'iA. ' . •'' •''. ' ' r • 1' . "1•1111 , ' ..1...'4,. ,•4•', . • .. At.•;• ;.' \ s., ',.,. :,.. 4 •:•411i. -.‘ ‘ ..46\ ! • 1.o •:V . 4 1 ! ''' • '-'ir*.'•'.7 /. - 9i ' *.'4‘ ' '. .1. ' .1' .1 • •.' o it, . . . ,, .• ■ 7 , . . " ,..•-'s I , ■. ,.. I • ,• ''',*4.%4,1 ,L1 . 4. °' .,, , ''' . ..N f , .‘‘'4, . 2.■,.‘•• , • .. ,. . ' lits. ," ' -'• -4:%•;••. it ' ' 1 -' -..dtZ".". • ,,,,' .• , iii...41y1(•„ 4„.•:.•, . ..1 ,y,f,. 'WA, .1. .!..•1 • -'. • i•'''''S ' '4°'It... • , ., •411 ....•. K;c 16-••• Y .1 .'I. '., -, 1 .I., , ' ., '• 4 , • N, II .7--f: i , ' • . ' : :"....1. .•,,, 1,t .. ... '• •• t.l''' . .4•f•s ' _ i ' 4 . 1.....i- ..fil..w,A r'. "-:: ::4 '. , ' , • - •- c• .' ' " r 1 • %-.,•!• ,.,:e.a,;/....,....;• ,, '',.,,,,'; , '.).4.1414-. .., '. '•,!:- ... -;:' :-".: i.,t'Ad„A' •i ...7'.H::;.,:i `...:;.ii...•I'.',T.•• fog- •1;4;;;. fk,- ,'-- ',.: :''....-;- . ,•,r • . I ,• pi,.•., .;4. .. •••;:, ‘ y ' ,:-........,.f.:1.•:_yfi ..., / • '1,•:..%,•'.'_ . , -. '..1• ;.. ,, 1 ( ii7,1 .,',.,, •• .••'• /1 ' , •4‘.,..' , . ' .'' ,•:'!•4.,:.'i'•'%,Asi\i'..,.C. ....,.,,, .. , .0 PI, • • • ..... - ,.. .1...,--.-L. . .•,, „ ••• - -,,,......3„.... .•' .,.. , ..• . •. • • -_ , •,..• . , • se, 1. - :.tigrgie•i."• ii •. -V \ ...-P1,' . 7.i• ;or-.-,..i...7..., , .-,*,‘• .1 ,i.... - • ....,- . - .• -• in. 1„ • •• ,.. '■:. 1/141i - r'..- •lit r k # • ). ',1 ,-**' T ,If 't I -.,.1.1.' Ni.,,,w,'fi„.. i ••'..-• ....- '', ..;.,.,•;.......; ' , , -1)... At . - /, . 141. -• ,., t 1 . " . ;*7 --..-. .' I , !.:', "y? ....wilt • .....; .. ;,...› : $i 4 „0. ,46:. ,‘‘..• :, -,',''' 14441..ii/r1:._ 1 . ,'' V k .' ',, , .-:• 7.V-:.• . .- •-*, it co ,. , I.,.4 .1t, •i'rf 1,r'''#',, . ' '';. ' lc ,i!•'.. ' 0 --..i. .--lirr • .. i ',,-; .'•,-11-1'." ..f*,... '-'"'" ti, ... . ....,:. • ••'' . 4 , l , •.;', tt• :..'. 0 • ...,4,;-•• r„'..' • Ow,',.-. ,-- . ' ' . . ,‘....4-& ";-. --...-..• !.11 ...;4,.,•..'.• `?• ....... i , ; „•• .1,.. ,,, ,,, ,,,,,,,.., ..„ ..7,.: .... ..,, . - .;•,..e-' •.. I a'•-1'•'. ,4 otelc...‘., • ....• ,.' ‘ I"...:t• '.•- .:' •40. .b! _:.•';:e.'.: ' • !.''.,.■.;,,,. , . . ' A.'4,-,• •- r. .. i •-. '•'''.:' • ••i- • .•.... "',. -'• 1:''' :' -• . 1..,. . .• i -.. . .:.i,. .. . .4 -.N.ztr. , - • . •• , , - • • --- - --. - . - ..• :. '4' .. ' .0 • '.• ' . . 7:;- :' • • 4 .V.,;,..: ..„:,,.,../,... / 1.... '. ,' -- . t% ''. '• ''. ...,iN:•-■ .-. ... ....• %..., ‘ ....", ,. ' ".; ..." -. 1. I.- '''' '-'• ;'' . • , •r % "' _ . ,.friti. .• ,..,..:, . ,, • • .: •'" 'It - : A " •I- 01.; • •.•,l'-. • . .,,• •-,-,,-. . , , . v . • .•,4.- .. :,,.., •. • • I . • •. : . ...e ,. %. ' ..;,- . .,,9; • ...• • .. .4„;.'".i.: .. ;,. '''..., . : ;.. -• V- .). _ . 0-. . /44`.....`44.- 0.4.** • • ...:. • ..... _ • . . , 1 • •,';:, _!..;.'#".--..- • .'t, - ,..4,4,4,. • ,, . ,....,,-,.„.,_ , ,t 1--..,..• -. .,.4r , .'3 7 xi .- • iii• ,,.. .2., i'.).1-. .- T- -.'.......•$,,,i,;>/.... ...h% '.. :.. .':•--.1..; -.: *. •. %, -4.,.r.., . '- A -,, '5,-., . ••• •, ,.,-,....----,-, ---„, •-.;444 -i •c. ., 4. , vAii••••;,-,t;:._,... ...;.,..2.2„•• v•• . .1, li .i. •,.;..• .,- ,... .,..,4-4-y.,..._-. ,.--.. , -- . -•,- . --... 1 - y, . .,,I,-1- .1.-.,:.• .'--;- -- -.., 4,-..-. ... ...-,r f#• j.....•., .. - . . A.. •,;.i'''•'''• '- .•" . . . ...- ...• - .4., •,,•. •Z, O.: '" , • '' • .,',• • 1 • -2-‘sion.f.;.- t .. -,''', . - . , • - • :.• . _ "` • itii : .. ... • ..i if..:.-•■.me. ::_______• ..)1.... . 7...::till',.. t • . .•••• a"' : ..' . i i . • • ,,...... 4:_ , . .. .t A, - ., • •••• . _:. • . ..., . . • - _._ _ .... ...„4„...__ ,_ . . ,, ., . ,..,•, ... ....• . •••:;......... .......,... . .„.• .,... • : .. ..,. .. ...,,.. _,.........._,It n,,.. , ... • • - • .. _ .._ .. • . • • ... • ... •••••••••• •• t • • •'-- „.....-.... ,...„.: .. ....: , . .. :.: -• .....„.,. ... , ' ....• . , • ,. •; .........• ,• •• • -A.*: - . .. •• • • :•:... ••I ••';, 0111",, ., .•:•••,.,........•....• • • • .• • . • •.-"--.- -••• .. . '4!• •' .... . .. • • k • • • . •••••!"'" . •... _ • • • "" • • ' -' ' s••• , , . . . . -.....-' . ...,,•:.-...• ...- . .:. - ' .. .. ‘, .- . -• ....„;• •••-•:.• . .....- • • „,...-- . • -.•-• _. . ,, ...•.• . • . • • • -• - • ' • ...''.• .••.•• . .. '.......,--. - . '•' : '-'„4:::z-,:?...k•-17- '.-.-.' • - - ••• • • . . • ..:--„,7'..: ..--,., :-.-- ••• • ' •:•-• ' ,4',:akitlifia:,•_•-,:.-.- _., ',...4,:, • • •.- _ •OW; r �*1,45' r 4 ir } � jL, L 1 / h 4 R" i 4'' • qty r• r • t, i 1• e if. ,,iyA14.9#.1.41;NL''1.' ,••‘. '4iiki 4 1 ') 141":.4r .. _,./.• ., r,,,,,,z ii,. 41„,,, i„. , •yi • ,...' .,..... . • ji �' !l v 09 VI yt -,41-41iN 1 I V/ ' ' '-'1° •?.4, Vi • A.,,ir ,t„, ��� ,r *f# y • v f; 1 ^' "kiN Sj C '/ „ tett”- /4 0�R ,; 44".)----4.t,,-• '''' 6.0 its- j`-`i "'i . v ' pokt.1 3.• s, i+ ,; , ,9 , .`,,,,r---0-.4..- *t.. -L- . ". -e, ;.c,....',; , ••,„ • \ .,:.., f - '•t S ys/ r 1 `rn .n ' , '"�,�4'�,� ,�-. N 4• S• ., t!r ^ .t, .5 ,+.4 �"3v j,' fi x,11 9,, •,t.�i t ,k"I i 'j3 / h • )tit/ • }[ Y t I /.! ..,: • p .. i 1;, ,M 4�' Y`� tI 41►'L ..i i +/. -V dd ti �, '',�,f' ..'•. *. T, JI ' t �► d�� .le t.r 1 t ',alt. .' 1 REP A FENCE �' ! p;�G 499•Sf3• C +'NM.R f,1A(M(( 1 ` i f t v i.P; 11 r '. . A' A / .,..• �Lr. 1 r I • r fit ..� i*, flit, ;'' . , AO . . ,, , ' 4- . - ^� ,; _. • . _ � �-T�• a '+'r• . F`r� 11� ! y .... Ilii . ., ,, ,,,f . 1 C -1 . # ' \ • r -_may T 4• . _' - -_ I .- l Y1► ��� -, 1 » ! ' + �� may;, .y r' • I 51 ` / J t , .......i . . , 1' II - •�i FENCE L. i, '94757 41441111181111116_4.. alieln•Ps.,,0V •)' --- - ( fir. ,' ,ti 10" i • � - .--Syr A.)' . ' + 'STATE' :1 T = - �; 41 '94757 9rn 1 >"1 �` . ..nor .: — y , c. �, l — / ■ etltr A _ . .wa 4.J•- , r ._ { ,' A� r{ ... •+{s9 i' ter 1 4 '• "` + .t-\ ` " •3. ,()1 �y •I .� Ip1' M . +. ,•• ' Al C q,t' 4,a 1 { / ( /- y 4 p . 1.+r ` •.,. ,".r • ,_ •• r -.. µ 'Kay N }\ ........;: i,l,,,..9 .tv", - -%:;: )6•..' . '.' ,'L'-V • ,'kJ '-‘ - •i ' '' 4! . • . ' ''\ . '''. - ,fgt- . ''1, .."1:',1\;71,,t4.: '..f.''.: :''',‘.1). ',i .; " ' "'w.....::1,— I.S' i . . 4,.... .,1 , . - - - ,, , , , . , I, , N. �'1Y {i�`i1} { -fy t-nv \ ., R_� :: \{,;. `'- +,,.r 1 t' (..- ' AL•STATE RMNC 4 99.575 , ,. .•a, ...t,•. ..co ■, ♦ �j 4N r 4 i , Nk • • .may+�.�. • , +. - . ,. -. . , ....-- \ ' ...-- ' ' --, a \1... l• I t , ,9� ., , M♦ ~4- ,�i. fb��r C f \%- f _ r r.._y ..rs.rfsh[:� Y!•4 YF` .,','r7t! A ._—ff;4 • �. ✓! • _ •� - ,'` 7 • .'"01110k - . 1. f •'•�• �` . { ....... _• V- 'l ~ .,° r u. ., . - 1 ,/*1 Y ,I -tt S.: it" . . '• ) iolirr'*:..- : -,..,c- t;-. ..., ..,.. . . . ... - --os. - .. .. . , • ............. ..t. ., _ . . _ .... _ A . ,._ .i it l i+,,t., ,.. er I .r I� . . 0 r • . • /I; .r. I i r d •. - 0,....•. i :,•,,jr7 Sai,'• I •: .;,}g; ) ,, '.' . 7 { .^ ��}y, ` ; '...,.'1-''' h wig , • V.. '....• ... -..-... :.. .' ., . It'.-'.'. ■ -- '. ' - •''''s.'rt:' - ..fog7.4 ' .. ' .' ,%,,litti .. ',,,.!'• 's • 4*,,.. e.k.. . , .. .. • • - - . 41 -f..,,„: ...• ... .,I h � 'r ,,,r. 4 :: yI 1-4);',:''...:. ,)'I: k . F run 1: .r+p � J ti I lei!✓3 ,rte -- ^ � ., 1 i1 ` '.yo-. . • ` : k ;,,.,A X11>1. • •j` .,q� `• •r�. i;, - - _•L k Ar d. ..(:/4,./f,. 4 L � /� • �` a .� •l w,l -}f .... 1 _ • jam i•a%" '•,`,tar ', - ?`ti k_ ,..: _ k • J '.ti T n 1 x r -;r,+ f t f ,.. `1) , ie-R.'�( -' 4 AMY\. ; • -. 1 :7 rr r�',+: f 1 di 7 f"''Ay,�,i + 'J y� Y'1��.f .v -I•of 'kArfl �.f�r-' �.�''�1,1 '�S; +i•.��� :: X.:., y- r_1 :JAI`,f�r:'t�'1'- . J-/,/jai�_.I .�'M y� k.iy ,-�!,jI-' 11 any.' ,. +", J �` '`r- „iF '+• � Tr. t k#J ,,,r{^yY.5 ,5,1ff -.. ira -" R f r.j, '^.:. :•J r -f f i.�:.:r"'�r+S � 'y``~'�' ]�"-3f'�`iJ' t.F. �'l .r• •*»�•wS''�. :. �'t'�G'. 1'i', !►t ',rw.� r� t' K ... i • ` •I 4.11114:ip ':' .-4.. --.'- - ----- .•• • I '$15F -.. J... ,-.':. I . • f MIMI ,I , — 1 . , • • • —I"'11 ' . . I •■•••aimiaabrisranWe 11 - i 1 •— .1 ••-f-___._ I -:-.] 1 •- i 4 ih ,- •. .• I liL.' •I ' - , • V-1.4 .•‘.. ••••0 * .• _ 1..'•Itim "Oa . II ! V :11/1 .• liv ,•••• ... "tV , -- , 7, .-:,. -.• -fw--.-.3 ,- ., .- / - — . :,.._ -..„, . .t.. - . •:. ,.!.. . 1 - ....i.toc:.-:,x... ..,„,y:-..... • , 4. -. ■ .-A, ..:-All; - , .0. ...:. .... A - ' - • , ‘ - . ..„........;., . - - • .., ,_.r..., 2.:,.. ,.. _-7,..Z....4.- .—..._ .,..,, •_ ., . . , tA r i•A- City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18819 reAL. Building Safety Department 10500 10900 Civic Center Center r Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 3 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • GRADING COMMITTEE • PROJECT REPORT&RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: SUBTT18819 Type: 17 lot residential subdivision Location: Southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street Planning Department: Tom GRAHN APN: Meeting Date: August 16, 2011 By: Matthew Addington Air Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx No: If NO, see COMMENTS below: • PRELIMINARY: GRC: August 16, 2011 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: PC Meeting: By: Note: Building and Safety—Grading will review and comment on future submittals for this project. A) STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. • The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of • California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3) A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6) The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. I:(BUILDING IPERMITSISUBTT188191SUBTTI 8819 Grading Committee Project Report 20110816.doc 1 of 5 r City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18819 s% Building&i Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8) A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports,shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. • 12) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 13) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 14) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 15) The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. . 16) The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 17) This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 18) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 19) Grading Inspections: • a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by 1:1BUILDING IPERMITSISUBTT188191SUBTT18819 Grading Committee Project Report 20110816.doc 2 of 5 ` City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18819 it Co Build10500 Ciing vic 8 Safety Center De Drpartment Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 3.. T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the ' Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and ' preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; • b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building • permit; ' iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 20) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. B) COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: 1) Please note that at this conceptual level a review of the accessibility access is not performed. It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. 2) The drainage on the east side of lots 7 and 16 appears to be draining against an existing or proposed masonry wall. This will cause an erosive condition to the horse trail. If drainage occurs across lots (i.e. from Lot 7 onto Lot 16), the drainage must either be in a concrete pipe or a concrete channel. Either the concrete pipe or concrete channel must be within a dedicated drainage easement for the lot accepting the drainage (i.e. Lot 16). Please adjust the design along the east equestrian trail accordingly. . 1:1BUILDING\PERMITSISUBT188191SUBTr1B819 Grading Committee Project Report 20110816.doc 3 of 5 City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18819 Building&Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. _ Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 3 M T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 C) SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit for any underground water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMPs), 2) The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 3) The applicant shall process a grading and drainage plan through the Building and • Safety Official to eliminate cross-lot drainage from Lot 7 prior to final map approval. 4) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 5) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 6) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 7) In the equestrian trails water bars shall be spaced accordingly: Equestrian Trail Slope Water Bar Interval • Spacing 4% to 5.99% 50-feet 6%to 8.99% 40-feet 9%to 11.99% 30-feet 12% and greater 20-feet 8) The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. L18UILDING'PERMITSISUBTr18B19\SUBTT18819 Grading Committee Project Report 20110816.doc 4 of 5 • City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18819 a. Building & Safety Department 't 10500 Civic Center Dr. ' j Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • D) WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 2) An updated Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was not submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for review. The WQMP will need to be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit. 3) A WDID number must be provided prior to final approval of the WQMP and issuance of the grading permit. 4) The following comments are from the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Thielmann Engineers dated April 9, 2011/May 24, 2011 has been reviewed and deemed "Substantially Complete" dated June 28, 2011. The following corrections are required prior to the final approval of the WQMP: Page Section Item A-5 1.3 Please show the receiving waters on Exhibit"B". A-7 2.2 2n° request: Please add the proper title for this section and reformat as necessary. A-13 3.2 In the matrix "Justification for Source Control BMP's not incorporated in the project WQMP" a reference is made to the "San Bernardino County Flood Control District" catch basin stenciling requirements. Please provide the wording of the county requirements for review and approval by the City Public Works Services Department. A-20 6 • The City of Rancho Cucamonga "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan Agreement"; the following items may be added to the agreement: • Prepared By— please add the engineering company here which prepared this document • Include the SUBTT and DRC file numbers in Section C. I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\SUBTT18819\SUBTT18819 Grading Committee Project Report 20110816.doc 5of5