Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015/07/15 - Agenda Packet • cior of Fi N H N 10500 Civic Center Drive 4. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD SUCCESSOR AGENCY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 2015 REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays 7:00 P.M. ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room 5:00 P.M. Call to Order Public Communications City Manager Announcements Conduct of Closed Session REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS MAYOR L. Dennis Michael MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Spagnolo COUNCIL MEMBERS William Alexander { Lynne B. Kennedy Diane Williams CITY MANAGER John R. Gillison CITY ATTORNEY James L. Markman r C CITY CLERK Janice C. Reynolds • • CITY TREASURER James C. Frost - S .. s » INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC �i"ss' ..... greflO t1 CAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board,Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. If as part of your presentation, you would like to display visual material, please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences. Any handouts for the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During"Public Communications,"your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items)will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other"Public Communications"which have not concluded during this one-hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an"Advertised Public Hearing"or on an"Administrative Hearing"Item(s),your name will be called when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less,as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's Public Library(-ies) and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand"from their computers. The added feature of"Streaming Video On Demand"is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/council/videos.asp for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Fire Board,Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board,Successor Agency,Public Financing Authority and City Council. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.cifvofrc.us illIf you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. o.. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 1 .:� CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DTAKC:HOa(UMONGA JULY 15, 2015 A. 5:00 P.M. — CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER — TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM IF Al. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE CITY COUNCIL. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I M C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I D. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS (NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION WILL OCCUR) E. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION — TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM I, E1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND EAST OF VINEYARD AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES NETTIE NIELSEN REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND LIDIA TALAVERA REPRESENTING NAI CAPITAL; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. - CITY F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 2 :j CITY COUNCIL AGENDA •sedmioacAmoNGA JULY 15, 2015 CG. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER — 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Update on Special Olympic World Game Host Town Activities July 21-24, 2015. H2. Announcement of Wilson Ave Extension Project Ribbon Cutting August 1, 2015. H3. Administration of Oath of Office to newly appointed Planning/Historic Preservation Commissioner effective August 1, 2015. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board, Public Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board, Successor Agency or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, ' PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND #�+�rir CITY COUNCIL AGENDA aANC:HOL•UCAMONGA JULY 15, 2015 CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: July 1, 2015 (Regular Meeting) J2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated June 24, 2015 through July 7, 2015 for the 1 total of $248,307.27. 12 J3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2015. J4. Approval of a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) between Alfredo Macias and Hilda F. 18 Hordyk, Trustees of the Macias/Hordyk Family Revocable Trust, Dated May 30, 2003 (Sellers) and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (Buyer) for the acquisition of 0.49 acres located on the north side of San Bernardino Road, west of Vineyard, known as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number 0208-091-72, in the amount of$437,500, plus a closing cost contingency of $25,000, funded from Account Number 3288501-5600. J5. Approval of a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) between David J. and Elizabeth F. 21 Walters,Trustees of the David J. and Elizabeth F. Walters Living Trust, Dated December 30, 2013(Sellers) and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District(Buyer)for the acquisition of 0.23 acres located on the north side of San Bernardino Road, west of Vineyard, known as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number 0208-091-36, in the amount of$437,500, plus a closing cost contingency of$25,000,funded from Account Number 3288501-5600 and approve an appropriation in the amount of $125,000 to be funded from Fire District Capital Land Purchase Reserve Fund balance to Account No. 3288501-5600. J6. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax levy for Mello-Roos Community Facilities 24 District No. 85-1 (CFD No. 85-1) for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 with 5% reduction. RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-017 26 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16. J7. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax levy for Mello-Roos Community Facilities 36 District No. 88-1 (CFD No. 88-1) for Fiscal Year 2015/16 with 5% reduction. RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-018 38 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, ••• PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA liAgretio c c..kMO A JULY 15, 2015 J8. Consideration of approval of a Resolution adopting a Side Letter amending the Memorandum 48 of Understanding with the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Management Employees Group. RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-020 49 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DISTRICT AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP. K. CONSENT CALENDAR — SUCCESSOR AGENCY K1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: July 1, 2015 (Regular Meeting) --- i L. CONSENT CALENDAR — PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY L1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: July 1, 2015 (Regular Meeting) --- M. CONSENT CALENDAR — CITY COUNCIL Ml. Consideration to approve Minutes of: July 1, 2015 (Regular Meeting) M2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated June 24, 2015 through July 7, 2015 and 56 payroll ending July 7, 2015 for the total of$3,815,469.02. M3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2015. 67 M4. Consideration for approval of an award to Insight Public Sector for the purchase of VMware 77 Software Maintenance and subscription renewal in the amount of $67,758.04 from Account No. 1001209-5300 (Contract Services). M5. Consideration of approval of Resolutions ordering the preparation of the annual engineer's 78 reports to initiate proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual engineer's reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, inclusive, for Fiscal Year 2015/16 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. No increase of assessment rates is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 15-116 81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 5 • J CITY COUNCIL AGENDA aAtweko(GCAMONCiA JULY 15, 2015 RESOLUTION NO. 15-117 83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1,2, 3,4, 5, 6,7,AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. RESOLUTION NO. 15-118 85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. M6. Consideration of approval of Resolutions ordering the preparation of the annual engineer's 235 reports to initiate proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual engineer's reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10 for Fiscal Year 2015/16 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. RESOLUTION NO. 15-119 238 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9, AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. RESOLUTION NO. 15-120 240 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9, AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. 242 RESOLUTION NO. 15-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R,7, 8, 9, AND 10, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, ,, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA £ i lCAMONGA JULY 15, 2015 M7. Consideration of approval of Resolutions ordering the preparation of the annual engineer's 512 reports to initiate proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual engineer's report, declaring the city council's intention to levy annual assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2015/16 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. No increase of assessment rates for FY 2015/16 is proposed or permitted. RESOLUTION NO. 15-122 514 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. RESOLUTION NO. 15-123 516 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. RESOLUTION NO. 15-124 518 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. M8. Consideration of approval of Resolution establishing an annual levy for the costs incurred in 533 the collection of assessments within Assessment District No. 93-1, Masi Plaza. No action is required to set the annual special assessment for this district as the special assessments were established during formation of the district and remain unchanged through the life of the bonds, pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Division 10 of the Streets and Highway Code. RESOLUTION NO. 15-125 535 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 M9. Consideration of approval of Resolution setting an assessment levy for the maintenance 542 and/or servicing of a drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin). FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 7 �.� CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ., ,OaGMONA JULY 15, 2015 RESOLUTION NO. 15-126 543 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS M10. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2000- 554 01 (South Etiwanda) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-127 555 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M11. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2000- 562 02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-128 564 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M12. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2000- 03 A (Rancho Summit) 2015 special tax refunding bonds. 570 RESOLUTION NO. 15-129 571 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 A (RANCHO SUMMIT) 2015 SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M13. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2000- 579 03 B (Rancho Summit), operation of and maintenance of parks and parkways. RESOLUTION NO. 15-130 581 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "B" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000- 03 B (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 TO FINANCE THE OPERATION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF PARK AND PARKWAYS. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 8 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 159 2015 M14. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2001- 589 01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 & 2, Series 2001-A), with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-131 590 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 (IMPROVEMENT AREAS NO. 1 &2), SERIES 2001-A. M15. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2001- 599 01 (Improvement Area No. 3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-132 600 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016(IMPROVEMENT AREA NO.3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001- 8. M16. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2003- 607 01 (Improvement Area No. 1 Zones 1, 2 & 3, Series 2003-A) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-133 609 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ZONES 1, 2 & 3) SERIES 2003-A M17. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2003- 616 01 (Improvement Area No. 2 Zones 1 & 2, Series 2003-B) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-134 618 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ZONES 1 & 2), SERIES 2003-B. M18. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2004- 625 01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) with no increase in current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-135 627 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 9 r CITY COUNCIL AGENDA IBM JULY 159 2015 M19. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2006- 635 01 (Vintner's Grove) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-136 636 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M20. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2006- 643 02 (Amador on Route 66) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-137 644 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M21. Consideration to accept the City Council Chambers Media Systems Revitalization Project, 651 CO 14-214,as complete,approve a resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion,authorize the release of the retention 35 days after acceptance and approve the final contract amount of $273,433.15. RESOLUTION NO. 15-138 653 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEDIA REVITALIZATION PROJECT, CO 14-214, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. M22. Consideration to accept the Civic Center—Parking Lot Lighting Project, Contract No. 15-036 654 as complete; release the Faithful Performance Bond; Accept a Maintenance Bond; authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond; approve a Resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion, release the retention 35 Days after acceptance and approve the final Contract Amount of $93,688. 656 RESOLUTION NO. 15-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CIVIC CENTER — PARKING LOT LIGHTING PROJECT CONTRACT, NO. 15-036 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. M23. Consideration for release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 2175707-M in the amount of 657 $15,285.35, for the Sidewalk Improvements at 91h Street from Hellman Avenue to Old Spur Track and Baker Avenue from 81h Street to 9th Street project, Contract No. 14-011. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 10 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 15, 2015 M24. Consideration for release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 024049290 in the amount of 659 $26,136.31, for the Central Park Pavilion Project, Contract No. 13-146. M25. Consideration to accept the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Utility Underground project, 661 Contract No. 14-118 as complete, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $459,471.92. RESOLUTION NO. 15-140 664 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BASE LINE ROAD AT 1-15 FREEWAY UTILITY UNDERGROUND PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 14-118, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. M26. Consideration of approval of Amendment No. 07 renewing the Professional Services 665 Agreements with a fee increase for All City Management Services, Inc. (CO#13-150) for Professional Crossing Guard Services, in the amount not to exceed $435,000.00. To be funded from Account No. 10187015300 (Contract Services FY 2015-16). M27. Consideration to approve a revised Drainage Reimbursement Agreement, DRA-43, for a 666 local drainage facility constructed in conjunction with the development of Tract 17651 located on the south side of Banyan Street east of East Avenue, submitted by K. Hovnanian Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 15-141 669 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LOCAL DRAINAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LINE A SOUTH OF TRACT 17651 BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM LINE 2-1 AND GYPSUM DRIVE, DRA-43 RESOLUTION NO. 15-142 670 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING THE LISTED BENEFIT PARCELS FROM THE PREVIOUS REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LOCAL DRAINAGE FACILITY CONSTRUCTION IN THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE AREA 5 FOR TRACT 17651, DRA-43. M28. Consideration to approve an Improvement Agreement for local Storm Drain Improvements 671 related to Tentative Tract 18960 located on the north side of Wilson Avenue west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Wilson Estates, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 15-143 673 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR LOCAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT 18960. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 11 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 15, 2015 M29. Consideration of the request to approve an agreement for design development and 674 construction document services conducted by RJM Design Group, Inc. for the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center Replacement project in the amount of$1,170,971.75 plus a 10% contingency in the amount of $117,097.18 for a total of $1,288,068.93 to be funded from account 1120401-5650/1896120-0. M30. Consideration to join the Inland Empire Regional Broadband Consortium. 675 RESOLUTION NO. 15-145 676 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JOINING THE INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL BROADBAND CONSORTIUM M31. Continuation of Resolution No. 15-093, Proclaiming the existence of a Local Drought 677 Emergency under Government Code Section 8630 and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.36. N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL/FIRE DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. N1. Approval of a Resolution adopting the Fire District's General Fund Final Budget for Fiscal 678 Year 2015/16 in the amount of $50,451,190, which is a combination of $24,215,140 in General Fund Operational Expenditures and $26,236,050 in Capital Reserve Expenditures. — Fire District RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-019 680 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FIXING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2015 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2016 N2. Consideration of a request to approve a contract with Active Network LLC for the upgrade of 682 Class Registration Software to ActiveNet. Funds totaling $68,420 for essential computer equipment approved in the 15/16 Fiscal Year budgeted to be paid from Account 1714001- Computer Equipment/Technology Replacement Fund and amending Resolution No's #. 14- 223, 14-097, 14-003 to include a 3.75% ActiveNet financial transaction fee. — City RESOLUTION NO. 15-144 685 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE APPLICABLE TO COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND AMENDING RESOLUTIONS NO. 14-003, 14-097 AND 14-223. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, • • PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 12• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -:lGa►lC:fi.acAMONGA JULY 15, 2015 N2. Consideration of public interest, convenience and necessity in granting a Taxicab Service permit to American Cab. — City(To be Continued to August 5, 2015 City Council Meeting) 688 N3. Consideration of public interest, convenience and necessity in granting a Taxicab Service 689 permit to RYKAL, LLC dba Yellow Cab as there was a change of ownership. — City(To be Continued to August 5, 2015 City Council Meeting) 0. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. 01. Update on 2015 City Council Goals. 690 02. Approval of a Permanent Community Cat Program as standard policy for the placement of 697 healthy feral cats. 03. Approval of Additional Public Hours for the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Adoption 699 Center. P. COUNCIL BUSINESS li The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. P1. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the -- meetings that were attended.) P2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council _- Member.) 0. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING R. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 9, 2015, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and on the City's website. inda A.Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director City of Rancho Cucamonga July 1, 2015 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLOSED SESSION, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, July 1, 2015 in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Steven Flower, Deputy City Attorney; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director; and Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS The following closed session items were considered: E1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND EAST OF VINEYARD AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES NETTIE NIELSEN REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND LIDIA TALAVERA REPRESENTING NAI CAPITAL; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY E2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP.—FIRE E3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF WHITTRAM AND ETIWANDA AVENUES; NEGOTIATING PARTIES LEONARD SANTORO, CBRE AND CHARLIE BUQUET; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY E4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(B) — NUMBER OF CASES (2) — SUCCESSOR AGENCY IC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No public communications were made. D. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS I No discussion or action was taken. * DRAFT * July 1, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 9 RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:00 p.m. with no action taken. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers at City Hall,located at 10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga,California. Mayor L.Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Steven Flower, Deputy City Attorney; Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director and Adrian Garcia, Assistant City Clerk. Council Member Kennedy led the Pledge of Allegiance. H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Announcement of the Lewis Family Playhouse's 2015/16 Season. Susan Sluka-Kelly, Cultural Arts Manager, announced upcoming performances for the 2015/2016 season. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. Greg Bell spoke about a free life skills program for children offered by the Athletes for Life Foundation. 12. Janet Walton offered a prayer. 13. Susan Keithly commented on the City's Animal Shelter. 14. Dana Keithly spoke about animal control statistics. 15. Richard Andrew expressed concern with trees on Victoria Park Lane not being watered and submitted a letter regarding his concerns. 16. Jacob Kuenz, Ygrene Energy Fund, spoke about clean energy measures. 17. Jim Lyons supported the City's Animal Control Department. 18. David Dykstra addressed Council regarding the animal shelter and water conservation. * DRAFT * July 1, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 9 CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: June 17, 2015 (Regular Meeting) and June 18, 2015 (Special Meeting— Budget Adoption). J2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated June 10, 2015 through June 23, 2015 for the total of $221,511.22. J3. Consideration for approval to award the purchase of Emergency Medical Supplies and Materials on an as needed basis, to Life Assist, Inc. of Rancho Cordova, California, in accordance with Request for Bid "RFP" #14/15-011 for Fiscal Year 2015/16, in an amount not to exceed $60,000.00 funded from Account No. 3281504-5200. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Williams, to approve the Staff Recommendations in the Staff Reports for Consent Calendar Items J1 —J3. Motion carried 5-0. K. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY K1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: June 17, 2015 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to approve the Minutes of June 17, 2015. Motion carried 5-0. L. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY L1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: June 17, 2015 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo, to approve the Minutes of June 17, 2015. Motion carried 5-0. M. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL Ml. Consideration to approve Minutes of: June 17, 2015 (Special Meeting — Drought), June 17, 2015 (Regular Meeting) and June 18, 2015 (Special Meeting —Budget Adoption). M2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated June 10, 2015 through June 23, 2015 and payroll ending June 23, 2015 for the total of$3,185,057.76. M3. Consideration to authorize the award of contracts for automotive maintenance and repair services to A & R Tire Services of Rancho Cucamonga, Ford of Upland, Lim's Auto, Inc of * DRAFT * July 1, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 3 of 9 Rancho Cucamonga, R & R Automotive Inc. of Rancho Cucamonga, in accordance with Request for Qualifications "RFQ" #14/15-201, to be funded from various City accounts contingent upon the approved budget for FY 2015-2016. M4. Consideration of approval to authorize the advertising of the"Notice Inviting Bids"for the Foothill Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation project from Vineyard Avenue to Haven Avenue to be funded from Measure I Fund and Citywide Infrastructure Fund. RESOLUTION NO. 15-107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM VINEYARD AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M5. Consideration to accept the Etiwanda Creek Park Sidewalk Improvement Project, Contract No. 15-068 as complete, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of$108,282.58. RESOLUTION NO. 15-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,ACCEPTING THE ETIWANDA CREEK PARK SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 15-068, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M6. Consideration to accept the Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation — Overlay of Various Streets project, Contract No. 15-054 as complete, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the balancing statement and final contract amount of $747,028.85. RESOLUTION NO. 15-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION —OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 15-054, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M7. Consideration to approve plans and specifications for the new Department of Innovation and Technology (DolT) Tenant Improvement Project, and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". RESOLUTION NO. 15-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY (Doll) TENANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M8. Consideration to approve Amendment No. 002 renewing Contract No. 14-017 between NEC Corporation of America and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Telephone System Maintenance and Support Services for Fiscal Year 2015/16, in the Amount of $102,050 from Telecommunications Fund 1001217-5300 (Contract Services). MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Williams, to approve the Staff Recommendations in the Staff Reports for Consent Calendar Items M1 —M8. Motion carried 5-0. * DRAFT * July 1, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 of 9 0. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL N1. Conduct Public Hearing and consideration to approve forming and establishing West-Side Neighborhood Parks and Street Lighting Community Facilities District No. 1 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,and adopt the Resolution of Formation establishing District, Resolution authorizing and setting a Special Election for the adoption of a Special Tax, and Resolution requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino to consolidate the Special Election with any election to be held. John Gillison, City Manager, introduced Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services, who gave the Staff Report on Item N1. She informed Resolution No. 15-111 was amended to clarify the mobile home rate is the same as the residential rate. Copies of the amended Resolution was provided to Council at the beginning of the meeting. Via power point presentation, she reviewed the purpose, need and history of the proposed facilities district. Existing funding is inadequate to continue to maintain neighborhood street lighting and parks. Feedback from more than 3500 residents over the last two years indicate residents want parks and streets kept safe and fiscal accountability. The proposed district would replace existing districts with a new West-side District to fund maintenance of street lights, parks, trails, and green spaces as defined in the amended Rate and Method of Apportionment(RMA); Districts PD 85, LMD 1, LMD 3A, LMD 3B, LMD 5, SLD 2, and SLD 6 would be dissolved; revenues would fund current day expenses for water, electricity, contracts. A summary of the proposed rates was outlined, noting seniors age 65 or older would qualify for the senior discount rate and there are no automatic rate increases.The maximum tax increases noted in the formation documents are a cap on rates; they are a ceiling. By law, the assessments will be considered each year at a public hearing each year, and could only be increased by the amount of actual costs or up to the cap, whichever is less. This is the same mechanism in the City's other newer assessment districts, and allows rates to be adjusted slowly over time to keep up with costs. Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services, responded to questions from the City Council. Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing at 7:55 p.m. Mayor Michael called on City Clerk Services Director to report on the Proof of Publication, and mailing of Notices for the Public Hearing. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, responded she was in possession of the proof of publication and mailing of notices for the Public Hearing. Mayor Michael announced it is time to hear any protest, comments and questions from interested persons, including persons owning property within the proposed Community Facilities District and taxpayers,with respect to the establishment of the Community Facilities District, the proposed method of determining and apportioning maximum amounts of special taxes. Speakers will have three minutes to speak. He noted not only does the Speaker Card include a box to be checked to request to speak, it also included boxes for(1) in support but not wishing to speak, (2) in opposition but not wishing to speak and (3) neutral but not wishing to speak. These are to be entered in the record. He reiterated this is the time to comment on this issue. * DRAFT * July 1, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 5 of 9 Public Comment Speakers in Opposition:Jim Moffatt, Sandra Warren, Paul Secrets (submitted letter), M.B. Edwards,Jr., Chris Carroll, Dennis Cisueros(submitted letter),Jack Adams,Darlene Tate,Gene Petty, Dr.Sharon Stein, Jim Partridge, Linnie Drolet, Mr. Querl, Gabriel Kuri, Mike Dalton, Terrance Malady, Sheryl Partridge, Rudy Saldana, Laurentine Gates, William Simmonds, Michael Lindsay, Jesus Gutterrez, John Prestor, Melinda Ryan, Karen Dreher, Raquel Martin, Cathy Thomas, Bill Jones,John G. Preston, Kim Earl. Speakers in Support:Jim Lyons, Richard Dinkelman, Lawrence J. Henderson, Theresa Marji, Nora Marji, Dalayna Marji. Submitted a Speaker Card in Opposition but Did Not Speak:Clarence Hofman (submitted letter),Cindee Dunlap, Carlos Orozco (submitted letter), Kevin Martin, Fernando Roccatan, Patricia Friedenback, William Gates, Dennis Gates,Joe Anderson, Ron Garman, Mary Ann Petty,Alex Martin, R. Martin, Frank Querl, Cathy Thomas, Cinda Mocabee, Jacob Brunner, Linda Barnhold, Rennard Davis, William May, Tanya May,Glenn Mocabee, Karen Dreher, Mike Ryan, Karen Beehler, Reagan Foley,George M.Jenkins, Pete Reinheimer, Mark& Cynthia Cushman, Pauline McHugh, Patricia Jackson,Joseph Hanna, Ron and Marilyn Smith, Matthew Gary-Trask, Selina Gray-Trask,Tom Rutten,Sam Valencia, Nancy Valencia, Paul Barnhold, Dan Titus (submitted Letter). Submitted a Speaker Card in Support but Did Not Speak: Pastors Jessica, Ly Vo, and Paul Reotutar of Shiloh Tabernacle, Vicky Weir, Georgia Martinez, Robert Brown,Susan Brown, Karen Metzgar, Cheryl Dye. Submitted a Speaker Card with Neutral Position but Did Not Speak:Amanda Valencia. Submitted a Speaker Card with Neutral Position: Erick Meisser, Gary Nelson,Thomas Patronite. Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services, and John Gillison, City Manager, responded to questions raised during Public Comment. Comments from the City Council. Mayor Michael asked City Clerk Services Director if there are any persons registered to vote within the Community Facilities District, and, if so, the number thereof. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director reported there are 52,439 registered voters within the proposed Community Facilities District. Mayor Michael advised the City received written protests and asked City Clerk Services Director if the written protests constitute a majority protest of the landowners or registered voters. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, replied no, the written protests submitted do not constitute a majority protest. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Alexander, to approve Resolution No. 15-111, with the amended Rate and Method of Apportionment and Special Tax Report distributed this evening, forming and establishing West-Side Neighborhood Parks and Street Lighting Community Facilities District No. 1 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and authorizing submittal of the levy of the Special Tax to the Qualified Electors. Motion carried 5-0. * DRAFT * July 1, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 6 of 9 RESOLUTION NO. 15-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FORMING AND ESTABLISHING WEST- SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND STREET LIGHTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS. Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing at 10:17 p.m. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to approve Resolution No. 15-112 authorizing and setting a Special Election for the adoption of a Special Tax within the boundaries of West-Side Neighborhood Parks and Street Lighting Community Facilities District No. 1 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for certain types of services and facilities and submitting the Special Tax to the Qualified Voters of such Community Facilities District. Motion carried 5-0. RESOLUTION NO. 15-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING AND SETTING A SPECIAL ELECTION FOR THE ADOPTION OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF WEST-SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND STREET LIGHTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR CERTAIN TYPES OF SERVICES AND FACILITIES AND SUBMITTING THE SPECIAL TAX TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Williams, to approve Y Y PP Resolution No. 15-113 requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino to consolidate the Special Election with any election to be held and to render specified services to said city relating to the conduct of said election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2015. Motion carried 5-0. RESOLUTION NO. 15-113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TO CONSOLIDATE THE SPECIAL ELECTION WITH ANY ELECTION TO BE HELD AND TO RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO SAID CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF SAID ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2015 Mayor Michael thanked staff for the report and for everyone who came out tonight. In compliance with Council procedure to conclude meetings by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by concurrence, Council continued the meeting. * DRAFT * July 1, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 7 of 9 0. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL Ingrid Bruce, Deputy Director of Innovation and Technology, reported on Items 01 and 02 concurrently. Y 01. Consideration to adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting for and on behalf of itself and in its capacity as the legislative body of Community Facilities District Nos. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda), 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park), 2001- 01, series 2012 A (Improvement Area 1 & 2), 2001-01, series 2012 B (Improvement Area 3), 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove) and 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) authorizing and providing for the issuance of Special Tax Refunding Bonds for each such Community Facilities District,approving the forms of Fiscal Agent Agreements, a Special Tax Refunding Bonds Purchase Contract, Escrow Agreements, Fist Supplemental Agreements and other documents and authorizing certain actions in connection with the issuance of such bonds. — City RESOLUTION NO. 15-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACTING FOR AND ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA), COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK), COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2001-01, COMMUNITY FACILITY DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS FOR EACH SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT,APPROVING THE FORMS OF FISCAL AGENT AGREEMENTS, A SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS PURCHASE CONTRACT, ESCROW AGREEMENTS, FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH BONDS. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Williams, to adopt Resolution 15-114. Motion carried 5-0. 02. Consideration to adopt a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Finance Authority (PFA) authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding revenue bonds and authorizing certain actions in connection with the issuance of such revenue bonds. —Public Finance Authority RESOLUTION NO. 15-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS, APPROVING THE FORM OF AN INDENTURE OF TRUST, SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS PURCHASE CONTRACT, ESCROW AGREEMENT,AND OTHER DOCUMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH REVENUE BONDS MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Williams, to adopt Resolution No. 15-115. Motion carried 5-0. * DRAFT * July 1, 2015 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 8 of 9 Q. COUNCIL BUSINESS 01. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) Council Member Williams announced she participated two weeks ago in a SCAG Special Meeting via teleconference. Mayor Michael reported earlier today, the SANBAG Board of Directors approved agreements with the U.S. Forest Service, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the County of San Bernardino for the Preparation of a Forest Management Plan. 02. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) There were none. Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING There were none. R. ADJOURNMENT II The meeting was adjourned at 10:28 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director Approved: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 * DRAFT * July 1, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 9 of 9 oz •'•:: 50 0 titi2j (:4 in V = U0 (1) o EJWN 2,ce W 2W cam Z ti as Q. N 0 (4>il ftsiv { , , it,,, t . 1 .41 e:N‘TOWq b N N O 0 v E t).0 O o O 0 c v, c—I `v u L CO J cn N v) c o co °' `r) o _J — v O Q CIL CIO CU c.n CD (./) ' 0 0 0 W C C C Ln 2 . 0 ._ -0 v, _,,O O v NI (.9 r1 eNJ = Q C b.0 � C CC VI k4- Q.) +� CO E o core O U 2 D >, v v O O Q o p 4J C > > cU r----- (r) QN O CC -0 I • • • • 1 d;)1Eini d' \I 3 d co IA biD co C W 0 E be O }, J u E c U cu O U > 0 al U c 0 _c U U N CC O O +1 ++ U •i O Z co -c cc a) _N �- a C Ca N U O L _ ::::-(4 N L 4 .- 4-0 N 4 E 0 a O FM. 06 E L 4--0 V 4_+ co VI CU Imim a) c to N v 4J +-' LJ s O CO a) ? co >. Q U CI � CD U 2J 1 +., E a1 CO N a) a 0 -0 U 0 L U 2 '>- 4-, Q CD cu 03 O O 0_0_ c ) CL 2 ccn C • • • • • C 0 Hco PO Z 2 'lin o t LW; a T� W o �W W W ��1 E o W (D N z L 1 1 1 a� z w ~ CC � a J CC 0) J -J — N W W TD X co W co 4 I s T� VN ' --.RW Q O - ley/WX II' : ;Y ItlgS dV N.,-. 0 .. ......k. .9 till CI ILI .< a �. 58 w 1 0 CD =11 CI W ai 0 2W � n QQ O > 00 °' w (4°91:;)-A O 71-`' ......0 a) v • <�E°W R y (1010.- o ! 7 n W� `,....1'3 o s 0 O.741 u C Z i Pr E '5 crs CO D o X ♦ � o ca V r >, U U c L O " J o CO 7) a INC i + a) - Q W♦ c(1) o \ T co - -0 c CU aCD d E 2 0 w0 o -C c15 W IZ ``- c 0 as 2 -a)a) w i C' O O U J 05 .20)) c c CIC 0 0 O (D 2 E E cc > L T L L T a) Q a) 0 E2 E E CC a) o o 0 > , n In cY) OE CV cc CV C6 1.- 4 li :0;011-- 1. 441%,;1, 1- _ .:TCLE:1 illr s till 1, .,- ..!.,c Q _I 0 TD w a U) GI t 73 C, I � CD C -- CD N 0 ° �� Q = Q > C O � �I- -o c3 W - NB 76 m To a- E L _ O U U U +r 0 c 0 ii: 0 Q /...)i9i:al 1- .__I c, .0 0 CI3 s 0 = (I 0 U O Q � I �EN � a C� i +-' 4E: U = Zawfo w co U 92 O c� g 0 CC " O H W W I O TD C E U U of bU W L oo o c L- o CC � � U I O N U O O c E '= o E = c N Cn 92 Film 03 D N 4E. CC 0 .� = U • O E E I E o cts o E .o 0 c o E o E co p o c T 0 rn TUO •-• • •4 • • L__- - - - --- <'N%°�J W„ (, 60.'z„ ®`1" MI J w a al L + c N c O oFc CO a. _ O Y I— —, c cis W = c r. a Q a o Inl E U T, 0 Cl. D %I7 a 0 0 Cl) 0 W c J W o Q i / - \ Q L / W W 0 Jai d N = N - a. L N 1� 10 4 cn E s co 1 CC co WF Z W V Z (..... ,.0,,,i R pai A cn 11 H � W O1 1 as c 0 cr) as 0 CO CO > _ N 0 - -' � c a -0 o V M _C E Q) a ° _ o U ›- E _ a 0 0 Zo 0 }, = (.1) W o cc c = Q "' ai > Q — 0 U (n J i O iil W - E CD 0 O I -o < '= U a) as V a C a' 0 5 Cz cz C +r > I— J < 0_ 9pNR JW. (`^� 12121 �../ i3Za U) a) C cn 0 W U n C "0 limm. CO 0 0 CZ - N co 0 0 V >7 - , 0) � U � a J E. u) o C 0 � = cm 0 Q � ' � � � W 0 � c CC ao LL m a5 1 (,,s 0 aOa) 0 LLII 0 0 ° I o- ccE E CO Eg 8 EUa2 -0 O O� i CZ -: Iw � .e '' MN isle 1 ; •i ∎ +ni6 -` i'" ' Itt;'i�i ; - .•W E '',....1..' � ' la .. . + ■ .1 - •h'. •2,161:1 ��::' • 1 '1-1---. , 1 , , , ........!,, t •Cie •:.., ' ': _:�:'••::' i' �' ._1 Ii111_•11 � ' . a J • W 1 i J _I ` ,. 1.--. •M// ! 7 W Ii 4 h Clei , . ' • J 11 Q a -; O.. • c d of A LL. V N 4 lI m , E \ • I, s `_L a . 1. 10 7.0 b t0 • • ! • :. k 0 Q '. ri"1" 4"4:141k I - i 01 4/6.— ,, fP.4<regio, zhi '''1/21441■E's■ 4 **. 4*.: = -- 7 ii. GC" Li W 1, T NJ I I— E H co v Z m N 3 0) -a , C 2 Cl) aE a Q v -0 a Q C CZ cc LL Q U 0 O it A asI— m = — o cc c 0 . 1* • 0 cn c_ 1 al aT as " g u) u) N U Y- Q 0 m 0_ �gy W • CC W o 1 U E U 'i 0 a) U o N 0 a) D U a) C N O V Q O CC i C a) 2 o > C V) �oU) O • • • • • .-,-)E OWA • Z ;- v 0 Ili W °' V E , o ,c > 1n O ` o . a) +� — a u,f2 (,,,,, E i I— IN _ > � � ° �Q O U O C u° O rn o I 0 c ,` �Cr �QV'o a, Z `J �n v 4 EJLU c ai � 0 � � ° o o o�EW Y 0° V = 4, o . co N 03 v w L an W a`+ a, o a to W evo > •v 2 O 'O E 2 0 $ +� m O 0. u 3 0 a c (� G N O O C o -. u y ,2 E 13 ` } _ `O Zi .'� O o v 4 0 o 0 C O O • 0 Ok E E +% O v w d E U v u°> --. M1 u a, L o a D O m eC irl lozNiceal 3 1 -.1 cr ,, ,. ., ,0 r A.,-. a > -T CD j a J Q (!) ,11‘ L Q 0+ U W U CC aa) cts Z c c Q cn .� O H a) 0 c w o = a) a. 8 13 0 i cc o m o o° 0 co N C U cm 0 • • LL al LL F- • • • • z: V‘ elk 1221 W la I:04 , > � �V`wJ' s ♦ a tl i � D CC oo \b�� 6 ' N a l' w II %.,.. 0 a cc tr F �� �z o i o „12 Y CL a Cl) a 1.4 Z 1 Iii a' W � Z 0 II N , Wo I u 0 o m I - 0 ,, Cl) v ._ v ) o `, ' 8 1 !I :!) •' L®>, a i t ., z i V 7.4hk 4 • • C 441!s: ft,' get r, • , -11.441k ' -,0111" it....••• r L-LJ A0 1 41. ‘• L.L., _Actr k )1) A(2.) I 4of r ierai 0 }' U (n C 5 cc O 0 O• CC Lc) O c r I O 0 >1 N 0 " U `-. IO n o oU 2 0 .O 0 a_) LL U (� LL 3d.Tic Ai Ikp U r �r` !r..7Pc'edopt ,4cie,o4te Eff'egjleja ;;',r47:eze ' a ##; 1 ' 1 ii 41%4,410•004 Ili w AA 4 f ;:: �1�`' .�.... _ to hog. fa �,,,AllW • 3afe ti • 1 ' �ufest Bhhg Y our bike and helmet* . .. . As we celebrate the completion and opening of this new road SATURDAY, AUGUST 1 , 2015 Time: 9:00 a.m. - Ribbon Cutting ceremony 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. - Community Celebration Wilson Avenue and East Avenue (Northeast corner) Bicycle Rodeo and Obstacle Event Bicycle Repair Station SRTS Information Fire Truck For information visit : http://www.cityofrc.us/ e- 1� lid +`+o.,00,.t r L .. : . Safe Light refreshments will be provided L • - Rputes H Al. ' y RANCHO Sctcd jij`' C;UCAh1ONGA --- - "per y• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P1 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00005292 06/24/2015 CALIF GOVERNMENT VERA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9,320.00 0.00 9,320.00 AP 00005293 06/24/2015 RCCEA 1,334.00 0.00 1,334.00 AP 00005294 06/24/2015 RCPFA 10,449.56 0.00 10,449.56 AP 00005295 06/24/2015 TENASKA POWER SERVICES CO 4,588.30 0.00 4,588.30 AP 00005296 06/24/2015 VIASYN INC 7,717.70 0.00 7,717.70 • AP 00005297 06/25/2015 ARUM ADA,ALEXANDER R 0.00 904.08 904.08 AP 00005298 06/25/2015 ALMAND,LLOYD 0.00 615.52 615.52 • AP 00005299 06/25/2015 BANTAU,VICTORIA 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005300 06/25/2015 BAZAL,SUSAN 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 AP 00005301 06/25/2015 BERRY,DAVID 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005302 06/25/2015 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005303 06/25/2015 CAMPBELL,GERALD 0.00 1,233.07 1,233.07 AP 00005304 06/25/2015 CARNES,KENNETH 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005305 06/25/2015 CLABI3Y,RICHARD 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005306 06/25/2015 CORCORAN,ROBERT 0.00 525.1 I 525.11 AP 00005307 06/25/2015 COX,KARL 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005308 06/25/2015 CRANE,RALPH 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 AP 00005309 06/25/2015 CROSSLAND,WILBUR 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005310 06/25/2015 DAGUE,JAMES 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005311 06/25/2015 DE ANTONIO,SUSAN 0.00 525.11 525.11 AP 00005312 06/25/2015 DOMINICK,SAMUEL A. 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005313 06/25/2015 EAGLESON,MICHAEL 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005314 06/25/2015 FRITCHEY,JOHN D. 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005315 06/25/2015 HEYDE,DONALD 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005316 06/25/2015 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 1,172.22 1.172.22 AP 00005317 06/25/2015 KILMER,STEPHEN 0.00 1,233.07 1,233.07 • AP 00005318 06/25/2015 LANE,WILLIAM 0.00 1,560.49 1,560.49 AP 00005319 06/25/2015 LEE,ALLAN J. 0.00 1,423.44 1,423.44 AP 00005320 06/25/2015 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1,224.46 1,224.46 AP 00005321 06/25/2015 LONGO,JOE 0.00 173.51 173.51 AP 00005322 06/25/2015 LUFfRULL,DARRELL 0.00 694.69 694.69 AP 00005323 06/25/2015 MACKALL,BENJAMIN 0.00 173.51 173.51 AP 00005324 06/25/2015 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 AP 00005325 06/25/2015 MCKEE,JOHN 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005326 06/25/2015 MCMILLEN, LINDA 0.00 246.76 246.76 AP 00005327 06/25/2015 MCNEIL,KENNETH 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005328 06/25/2015 MICIIAEL, L.DENNIS 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005329 06/25/2015 MORGAN,BYRON 0.00 3,384.57 3,384.57 AP 00005330 06/25/2015 MYSKOW,DENNIS 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005331 06/25/2015 NAUMAN,MICHAEL 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005332 06/25/2015 NEE,RON 0.00 1,757.12 1,757.12 AP 00005333 06/25/2015 NELSON,MARY JANE 0.00 173.51 173.51 AP 00005334 06/25/2015 PLOUNG,MICHAEL J 0.00 556.94 556.94 AP 00005335 06/25/2015 POST,MICHAEL R 0.00 1,577.31 1,577.31 AP 00005336 06/25/2015 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,560.49 1,560.49 AP 00005337 06/25/2015 ROEDER,JEFF 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005338 06/25/2015 SALISBURY,THOMAS 0.00 893.87 893.87 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P2 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00005339 06/25/2015 SMITH,RONALD 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005340 06/25/2015 SPAGNOLO,SAM 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005341 06/25/2015 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 694.69 694.69 AP 00005342 06/25/2015 SULLIVAN,JAMES 0.00 753.31 753.31 AP 00005343 06/25/2015 TAYLOR,STEVE 0.00 1,224.46 1,224.46 AP 00005344 06/25/2015 TULEY,TERRY 0.00 1.172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005345 06/25/2015 VANDERKALLEN,FRANCIS 0.00 1,192.64 1,192.64 AP 00005346 06/25/2015 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,233.07 1,233.07 AP 00005347 06/25/2015 WOLFS.JACKIE 0.00 600.74 600.74 AP 00005348 06/25/2015 YOWELL,TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 AP 00359392 06/24/2015 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 342.99 0.00 342.99 AP 00359393 06/24/2015 ABDELKHALEQ,AHMAD 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00359394 06/24/2015 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 13,026.16 0.00 13,026.16 AP 00359395 06/24/2015 ACTION AWARDS INC. 3,072.14 0.00 3,072.14 AP 00359396 06/24/2015 ADDINGTON,MATTHEW 35.00 0.00 35.00 AP 00359397 06/24/2015 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 AP 00359398 06/24/2015 ALL CITIES TOOLS 0.00 1,641.60 1,641.60 AP 00359399 06/24/2015 ALL WELDING 2,790.00 0.00 2,790.00 AP 00359400 06/24/2015 ALL13EE, KAREN A 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00359401 06/24/2015 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 214.00 0.00 214.00 AP 00359402 06/24/2015 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES LLC 2,521.40 0.00 2,521.40 AP 00359403 06/24/2015 ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS 0.00 224.55 224.55 AP 00359404 06/24/2015 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 11,320.13 11,320.13 AP 00359405 06/24/2015 ALPHAGRAPHICS 420.86 0.00 420.86 AP 00359406 06/24/2015 ALTA LAGUNA MOBILE HOME PARK 1,100.00 0.00 1,100.00 AP 00359407 06/24/2015 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00359408 06/24/2015 AMERICAN SAFETY&HEALTH PROMOTION LTD. 0.00 498.00 498.00 AP 00359409 06/24/2015 AMERICAN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC 1,396.91 0.00 1,396.91 AP 00359410 06/24/2015 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 1,297.32 0.00 1,297.32 AP 00359411 06/24/2015 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00359412 06/24/2015 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 6,948.66 0.00 6,948.66 Al' 00359413 06/24/2015 AROCHO,ALMA 913.00 0.00 913.00 Al' 00359414 06/24/2015 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 701.24 0.00 701.24 Al' 00359415 06/24/2015 ART OF LIVING FOUNDATION 48.00 0.00 48.00 AP 00359416 06/24/2015 ARTISTIC RESOURCES CORPORATION 4,101.00 0.00 4,101.00 AP 00359417 06/24/2015 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 14.38 0.00 14.38 AP 00359418 06/24/2015 AVANTS.MARGE 195.00 0.00 195.00 AP 00359419 06/24/2015 BABCOCK LABORATORIES INC 565.00 0.00 565.00 AP 00359420 06/24/2015 BALDY FIRE AND SAFETY 205.00 0.00 205.00 AP 00359421 06/24/2015 BARBARA'S ANSWERING SERVICE 589.16 0.00 589.16 AP 00359422 06/24/2015 BARNES AND NOBLE 973.75 0.00 973.75 AP 00359423 06/24/2015 BARRON,CAITLIN 82.08 0.00 82.08 AP 00359424 06/24/2015 BATTERY POWER INC 2,920.20 0.00 2,920.20 AP 00359425 06/24/2015 BCT ENTERTAINMENT 32,042.28 0.00 32,042.28 Al' 00359426 06/24/2015 BERN MARIES PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 990.48 0.00 990.48 AP 00359427 06/24/2015 BIDOCHKA,CHRIS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00359428 06/24/2015 BISHOP COMPANY 545.27 0.00 545.27 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p3 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359429 06/24/2015 BURGAN,MARY 32.39 0.00 32.39 AP 00359430 06/24/2015 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 10,434.60 0.00 10,434.60 AP 00359431 06/24/2015 CABLE INC. 1,715.70 0.00 1,715.70 AP 00359432 06/24/2015 CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 3,763.50 0.00 3,763.50 AP 00359433 06/24/2015 CALIFORNIA COOKOUT 2,043.75 0.00 2,043.75 AP 00359434 06/24/2015 CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC. 0.00 250.00 250.00 AP 00359435 06/24/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00359436 06/24/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00359437 06/24/2015 CALPERS 130,107.31 7,167.44 137,274.75 *** AP 00359438 06/24/2015 CALVERT,JASON 28.07 0.00 28.07 AP 00359439 06/24/2015 CAMBRIDGE COLLEGE 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00359440 06/24/2015 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 4,204.99 79.35 4,284.34 *** AP 00359441 06/24/2015 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 1,300.00 0.00 1,300.00 AP 00359442 06/24/2015 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 3,082.75 0.00 3,082.75 AP 00359443 06/24/2015 CELL ENERGY 30.00 0.00 30.00 AP 00359444 06/24/2015 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00359445 06/24/2015 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 14.88 0.00 14.88 AP 00359446 06/24/2015 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 641.47 0.00 641.47 AP 00359447 06/24/2015 CINTAS CORP.4150 2,217.43 0.00 2,217.43 AP 00359448 06/24/2015 CIRIACKS,VALERIE ANN 135.00 0.00 135.00 AP 00359449 06/24/2015 CITY RENTALS 376.49 0.00 376.49 AP 00359450 06/24/2015 CIVICA SOFTWARE INC. 1,350.00 0.00 1,350.00 AP 00359451 06/24/2015 CLAREMONT HIGH SCHOOL 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00359452 06/24/2015 CLARK,KAREN 684.00 0.00 684.00 AP 00359453 06/24/2015 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 138.68 0.00 138.68 AP 00359454 06/24/2015 CLARY CORPORATION 1,352.55 0.00 1,352.55 AP 00359455 06/24/2015 CLEAR COAST RESTORATION 0.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 AP 00359456 06/24/2015 COAST RECREATION INC 1,581.81 0.00 1,581.81 AP 00359457 06/24/2015 COIT SERVICES INC. 810.00 0.00 810.00 AP 00359458 06/24/2015 CONFIRE JPA 0.00 49,102.99 49,102.99 AP 00359459 06/24/2015 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 876.96 0.00 876.96 AP 00359460 06/24/2015 COOKSEY,ANNA 19.80 0.00 19.80 AP 00359461 06/24/2015 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 892.33 0.00 892.33 AP 00359462 06/24/2015 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 10,004.31 0.00 10,004.31 AP 00359463 06/24/2015 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 864.00 0.00 864.00 AP 00359464 06/24/2015 DCT 8TH AND VINEYARD LLC 2,779.00 0.00 2,779.00 AP 00359465 06/24/2015 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION 0.00 384.00 384.00 AP 00359466 06/24/2015 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 258.62 0.00 258.62 Al' 00359467 06/24/2015 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIONS 0.00 1,362.25 1,362.25 AP 00359468 06/24/2015 DLIMAGING 239.44 0.00 239.44 AP 00359469 06/24/2015 DOLLARHIDE,GINGER 168.00 0.00 168.00 AP 00359470 06/24/2015 DOWNEY,JENNIFER 13.32 0.00 13.32 AP 00359471 06/24/2015 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,THE 0.00 150.00 150.00 AP 00359472 06/24/2015 DUNN,ANN MARIE 762.00 0.00 762.00 AP 00359473 06/24/2015 EASTERLING,RAY 211.20 0.00 211.20 AP 00359474 06/24/2015 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 700.38 26.00 726.38*** AP 00359475 06/24/2015 HULAS,TRIO 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P4 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359476 06/24/2015 EMC RESEARCH 17,000.00 0.00 17.000.00 AP 00359477 06/24/2015 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC. 3,212.13 0.00 3,212.13 AP 00359478 06/24/2015 ESKENAZI,MOISES 237.50 0.00 237.50 AP 00359479 06/24/2015 FAILSAFE TESTING 0.00 3,084.20 3,084.20 AP 00359480 06/24/2015 FAZEL,ZIA 290.93 0.00 290.93 AP 00359481 06/24/2015 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 28.00 0.00 28.00 AP 00359482 06/24/2015 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 153.32 153.32 AP 00359483 06/24/2015 FLINT TRADING INC 1,813.62 0.00 1,813.62 AP 00359484 06/24/2015 FOOTHILL MOBILE MANOR 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00359485 06/24/2015 FREGOSO,VIVIAN 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00359486 06/24/2015 FRIENDS OF THE BUENA PARK YOUTH'THEATRE 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00359487 06/24/2015 FULLER, REBECCA 45.11 0.00 45.11 AP 00359488 06/24/2015 GAIL MATERIALS 1,838.96 0.00 1,838.96 AP 00359489 06/24/2015 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY AND CREMATORY 550.00 0.00 550.00 AP 00359490 06/24/2015 GIORDANO,MARIANNA 38.40 0.00 38.40 AP 00359491 06/24/2015 GOODFIELD, RICHARD 48.00 0.00 48.00 AP 00359492 06/24/2015 GOODYEAR TIRE&RUBBER COMPANY 5,039.18 0.00 5,039.18 AP 00359493 06/24/2015 GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 2,304.55 0.00 2,304.55 "` AP 00359494 06/24/2015 GRAINGER 5,370.68 497.11 5,867.79"' AP 00359495 06/24/2015 GRAVES& KING LLP 693.75 0.00 693.75 AP 00359496 06/24/2015 GRAYBAR 260.50 0.00 260.50 AP 00359497 06/24/2015 GROSH SCENIC RENTALS INC 86.40 0.00 86.40 AP 00359498 06/24/2015 HACKETT,RAMONA 258.00 0.00 258.00 AP 00359499 06/24/2015 HAMILTON,MONIQUE 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00359500 06/24/2015 HAMPTON YOGA 948.00 0.00 948.00 AP 00359501 06/24/2015 HD PRODUCTIONS LLC 10,750.00 0.00 10,750.00 AP 00359502 06/24/2015 HENRY SCFIEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 126.48 0.00 126.48 AP 00359503 06/24/2015 HI WAY SAFETY INC 2,290.21 0.00 2,290.21 AP 00359504 06/24/2015 HILL,KENNETH 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00359505 06/24/2015 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 2,791.65 0.00 2,791.65 AP 00359506 06/24/2015 HOSE MAN INC 121.47 0.00 121.47 AP 00359507 06/24/2015 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY INi 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00359508 06/24/2015 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 4,672.15 0.00 4,672.15 AP 00359509 06/24/2015 HURTADO,JULIO 86.00 0.00 86.00 AP 00359511 06/24/2015 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 20,082.50 20,082.50 AP 00359512 06/24/2015 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 52.50 0.00 52.50 AP 00359513 06/24/2015 IPROMOTEU 0.00 2,025.44 2,025.44 AP 00359514 06/24/2015 ISMAIL,ROSA 112.00 0.00 112.00 AP 00359515 06/24/2015 IXCO,ALBERT 118.78 0.00 118.78 AP 00359516 06/24/2015 1 AND S STRIPING CO INC 1,759.00 0.00 1.759.00 AP 00359517 06/24/2015 JACOBS ENGINEERING 43,522.83 0.00 43,522.83 AP 00359518 06/24/2015 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 3,294.16 0.00 3,294.16 AP 00359519 06/24/2015 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 3,539.40 0.00 3,539.40 AP 00359520 06/24/2015 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 13,051.84 0.00 13,051.84 AP 00359521 06/24/2015 JRC HOUSING 1,285.00 0.00 1,285.00 AP 00359522 06/24/2015 JULIUS,MICHAEL 99.00 0.00 99.00 Al' 00359523 06/24/2015 KASA CONSTRUCTION INC 102,868.45 0.00 102,868.45 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P5 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359524 06/24/2015 KONE INC 1,267.22 0.00 1,267.22 AP 00359525 06/24/2015 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 108.15 0.00 108.15 AP 00359526 06/24/2015 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 0,00 1,057.01 1,057.01 AP 00359527 06/24/2015 LAYNE,TAMARA 54.25 0.00 54.25 AP 00359528 06/24/2015 LEAPING LIZARDS MUSIC 1,254.00 0.00 1,254.00 AP 00359529 06/24/2015 LEON,LYDIA 79.00 0.00 79.00 AP 00359530 06/24/2015 LEW EDWARDS GROUP,THE 6,345.98 0.00 6,345.98 AP 00359531 06/24/2015 LOPEZ,ANGEL 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00359532 06/24/2015 LUGO,HEATHER 737.75 0.00 737.75 AP 00359533 06/24/2015 MANKE,ART 1,533.00 0.00 1,533.00 AP 00359534 06/24/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 73,116.47 6,340.81 79,457.28*** AP 00359535 06/24/2015 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 0.00 1,709.93 1,709.93 AP 00359536 06/24/2015 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00359537 06/24/2015 MASON,MIKE 473.37 0.00 473.37 AP 00359538 06/24/2015 MATERIAL SALES UNLIMITED 1,003.20 0.00 1,003.20 AP 00359539 06/24/2015 MC TRUCKING 1,325.21 0.00 1,325.21 AP 00359540 06/24/2015 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 3,855.99 0.00 3,855.99 AP 0035954! 06/24/2015 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 720.00 0.00 720.00 AP 00359542 06/24/2015 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 204.29 0.00 204.29 AP 00359543 06/24/2015 MENDEZ,JOB 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00359544 06/24/2015 MIDWEST TAPE 855.98 0.00 855.98 AP 00359545 06/24/2015 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 3.00 0.00 3.00 AP 00359546 06/24/2015 MORRIS,DOUG 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00359547 06/24/2015 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00359548 06/24/2015 MURADIAN,LESLIE 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00359549 06/24/2015 MUSICSTAR 2,322.00 0.00 2,322.00 AP 00359550 06/24/2015 NEXTEL 0.00 164.97 164.97 AP 00359551 06/24/2015 NINYO&MOORE 15,015.50 0.00 15,015.50 AP 00359552 06/24/2015 NORMAN,CHRIS 86.00 0.00 86.00 AP 00359553 06/24/2015 NOTEWORTHY PUPPETS 874.00 0.00 874.00 AP 00359554 06/24/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 2,873.56 763.32 3,636.88*** AP 00359555 06/24/2015 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 477.27 61.13 538.40*** AP 00359556 06/24/2015 ORONA,PATRICIA 1,680.00 0.00 1,680.00 AP 00359557 06/24/2015 OTT,LAURA 736.00 0.00 736.00 AP 00359558 06/24/2015 OTT,SHARON 590.00 0.00 590.00 AP 00359559 06/24/2015 PACIFIC ADVANCED CIVIL ENGINEERING 3,800.00 0.00 3,800.00 AP 00359560 06/24/2015 PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00359561 06/24/2015 PAPAZOGLU,NORAY 588.00 0.00 588.00 AP 00359562 06/24/2015 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00359563 06/24/2015 PATCHETT&ASSOCIATES 1,596.15 0.00 1,596.15 AP 00359564 06/24/2015 PEP BOYS 121.72 0.00 121.72 AP 00359565 06/24/2015 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK,THE 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00359566 06/24/2015 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 51,827.50 0.00 51,827.50 AP 00359567 06/24/2015 PORAC 130.00 0.00 130.00 AP 00359568 06/24/2015 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 175.50 0.00 175.50 AP 00359569 06/24/2015 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 84.24 0.00 84.24 AP 00359570 06/24/2015 PRESCO'I'T,MARTIN 1,055.59 0.00 1,055.59 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P6 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359571 06/24/2015 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 620.95 0.00 620.95 AP 00359572 06/24/2015 PRO SALES GROUP INC 20,892.26 0.00 20,892.26 AP 00359575 06/24/2015 PROVO ENGINEERING 25,064.00 0.00 25,064.00 AP 00359576 06/24/2015 PUBLIC SURPLUS 912.87 0.00 912.87 AP 00359577 06/24/2015 RAINEY,LATREACE 495.00 0.00 495.00 AP 00359578 06/24/2015 RAMONA VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 1,200.00 0.00 1200.00 AP 00359579 06/24/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 9,227.40 0.00 9,227.40 AP 00359580 06/24/2015 RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICES 1NC 320.00 0.00 320.00 AP 00359581 06/24/2015 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 3.78 0.00 3.78 AP 00359582 06/24/2015 RC COMMUNITY&ARTS FOUNDATION 3,670.00 0.00 3,670.00 AP 00359583 06/24/2015 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 0.00 980.00 980.00 AP 00359584 06/24/2015 RIGELMAN, ENCARNACION ONTIVEROS 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00359585 06/24/2015 RILES,JEANE'VI'E 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00359586 06/24/2015 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 272.00 0.00 272.00 AP 00359587 06/24/2015 ROGERS ANDERSON MALODY&SCOTT LLP 9,310.00 0.00 9,310.00 AP 00359588 06/24/2015 ROTO ROOTER 4,999.98 0.00 4,999.98 AP 00359589 06/24/2015 RSSA HOME 0.00 7,720.92 7,720.92 AP 00359590 06/24/2015 RUI3ENS AUTO COLLISION CENTER 4,259.18 0.00 4,259.18 AP 00359591 06/24/2015 S&SON'S ELECTRICAL CONTRAC'T'ORS CORP 89,003.60 0.00 89,003.60 AP 00359592 06/24/2015 SAFE-EN'T'RY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 250.00 250.00 AP 00359593 06/24/2015 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 149.04 0.00 149.04 AP 00359594 06/24/2015 SAFT,BRANDON 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00359595 06/24/2015 SAMS CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANK 336.06 0.00 336.06 AP 00359596 06/24/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 967.16 0.00 967.16 AP 00359597 06/24/2015 SAN BERNARDINO C1'Y 16,037.46 0.00 16,037.46 AP 00359598 06/24/2015 SBPEA 1,086.80 0.00 1,086.80 AP 00359599 06/24/2015 SC FUELS 24,682.17 0.00 24,682.17 AP 00359600 06/24/2015 SCHULTE,JODY 26.20 0.00 26.20 AP 00359601 06/24/2015 SDC LEAGUE HEALTH FUND 675.00 0.00 675.00 AP 00359602 06/24/2015 SDC LEAGUE PENSION FUND 368.00 0.00 368.00 AP 00359603 06/24/2015 SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS 915.00 0.00 915.00 AP 00359604 06/24/2015 SENECHAL,CALVIN 645.00 0.00 645.00 AP 00359605 06/24/2015 SEXTON,SHEILA 6.00 0.00 6.00 AP 00359606 06/24/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00359607 06/24/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 93.38 0.00 93.38 AP 00359608 06/24/2015 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 181,632.28 0.00 181,632.28 AP 00359609 06/24/2015 SIGN SHOP,THE 648.00 0.00 648.00 AP 00359610 06/24/2015 SILVER,EDNA 720.00 0.00 720.00 AP 00359611 06/24/2015 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 199.00 0.00 199.00 AP 00359612 06/24/2015 SNAP ON INDUSTRIAL 0.00 35,737.29 35,737.29 AP 00359613 06/24/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 92.72 298.84 391.56"' AP 00359614 06/24/2015 SOURCE GRAPHICS 107.52 0.00 107.52 AP 00359618 06/24/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,474.90 718.48 13,193.38"' AP 00359619 06/24/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 190,624.37 0.00 190,624.37 AP 00359620 06/24/2015 SPARKLGFTS 76.00 0.00 76.00 AP 00359621 06/24/2015 STREAMLINE PRESS INC 147.96 0.00 147.96 AP 00359622 06/24/2015 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 900.00 0.00 900.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P7 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359623 06/24/2015 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 65.00 65.00 AP 00359624 06/24/2015 THEATRE @ BOSTON COURT,THE 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00359625 06/24/2015 THEATRE COMPANY,THE 545.00 0.00 545.00 AP 00359626 06/24/2015 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER 415.34 0.00 415.34 AP 00359627 06/24/2015 TJ'S FLOOR COVERING SUPPLIES INC 110.16 0.00 110.16 AP 00359628 06/24/2015 TRACEY,VAL 336.00 0.00 336.00 AP 00359629 06/24/2015 U S BANK N.A. 49.70 0.00 49.70 AP 00359630 06/24/2015 ULINE 722.31 0.00 722.31 AP 00359631 06/24/2015 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 354.00 0.00 354.00 AP 00359632 06/24/2015 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 38,475.00 0.00 38,475.00 AP 00359633 06/24/2015 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 3,141.04 0.00 3,141.04 AP 00359634 06/24/2015 UNITED WAY 159.00 0.00 159.00 AP 00359635 06/24/2015 UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORP @ CSUSB,THE 7,000.00 0.00 7,000.00 AP 00359636 06/24/2015 UPLAND CHRISTIAN ACADEMY 132.53 0.00 132.53 AP 00359637 06/24/2015 UPS 100.22 0.00 100.22 AP 00359638 06/24/2015 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 96,305.84 0.00 96,305.84 AP 00359639 06/24/2015 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,960.12 0.00 4,960.12 AP 00359640 06/24/2015 VECCHIO,TOM 202.00 0.00 202.00 AP 00359644 06/24/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 4,745.02 0.00 4,745.02 AP 00359645 06/24/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 4,110.00 0.00 4,110.00 AP 00359646 06/24/2015 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 5,781.73 0.00 5,781.73 AP 00359647 06/24/2015 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00359648 06/24/2015 VICTORIA GARDENS 10,175.00 0.00 10,175.00 AP 00359649 06/24/2015 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,842.42 0.00 10,842.42 AP 00359650 06/24/2015 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 524.95 265.00 789.95*** AP 00359651 06/24/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 7,233.59 508.20 7,741.79*** AP 00359652 06/24/2015 WEBBER,DEBORAH 39.97 0.00 39.97 AP 00359653 06/24/2015 WEST COAST CONCERT LIGHTING 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00359654 06/24/2015 WEST COAST SIDING&TRIM 603.39 0.00 603.39 AP 00359655 06/24/2015 WESTERN STATES FIRE EQUIPMENT 0.00 8,594.00 8,594.00 AP 00359656 06/24/2015 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00359657 06/24/2015 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 1,609.17 0.00 1,609.17 AP 00359658 06/24/2015 WILSON AND BELL 554.17 0.00 554.17 AP 00359659 06/24/2015 WONG, DAVID 69.50 0.00 69.50 AP 00359660 06/25/2015 BELL,MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,560.49 1,560.49 AP 00359661 06/25/2015 LONCAR,PHILIP 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00359662 06/25/2015 TOWNSEND,JAMES 0.00 1,560.49 1,560.49 AP 00359663 06/25/2015 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 246.76 246.76 AP 00359666 06/25/2015 BRODART BOOKS 4,119.85 0.00 4,119.85 AP 00359669 06/25/2015 C V W D 50,767.25 1,063.41 51,830.66*** AP 00359670 06/25/2015 PENNY PLUMBING 4,525.00 0.00 4,525.00 AP 00359671 06/25/2015 SUNRISE FORD 152.56 0.00 152.56 AP 00359672 06/25/2015 TOMARK SPORTS INC 378.00 0.00 378.00 AP 00359673 06/25/2015 VISTA PAINT 6,049.80 0.00 6,049.80 AP 00359674 07/01/2015 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 901.84 0.00 901.84 AP 00359675 07/01/2015 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00359676 07/01/2015 ADVANCED ALTERNATOR EXCHANGE 178.20 0.00 178.20 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P8 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citr Fire Amount AP 00359677 07/01/2015 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 1,154.00 0.00 1,154.00 AP 00359678 07/01/2015 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 4,212.10 0.00 4,212.10 AP 00359679 07/01/2015 ALL SURFACE ROOFING&WATERPROOFING INC 10,961.00 0.00 10,961.00 AP 00359680 07/01/2015 ALL WELDING 3,499.20 0.00 3,499.20 AP 00359681 07/01/2015 ALMARAR,AHNED MOHAMED JUMAA 19.25 0.00 19.25 AP 00359682 07/01/2015 ALPHAGRAPHICS 30.78 0.00 30.78 AP 00359683 07/01/2015 AL'I'A LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 725.00 0.00 725.00 AP 00359684 07/01/2015 AM'I'ECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 281.07 0.00 281.07 AP 00359685 07/01/2015 ARANA,JONATHON 1,399.50 0.00 1,399.50 AP 00359686 07/01/2015 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 307.75 0.00 307.75 AP 00359687 07/01/2015 ASSI SECURITY 8,353.00 0.00 8,353.00 AP 00359688 07/01/2015 AUFBAU CORPORATION 20,560.00 0.00 20,560.00 AP 00359689 07/01/2015 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 68.98 0.00 68.98 AP 00359690 07/01/2015 BATTERY POWER INC 1,196.16 0.00 1,196.16 AP 00359691 07/01/2015 BELTRAN,OSBALDO ALVARADO 864.00 0.00 864.00 AP 00359692 07/01/2015 BUFFALO WINGS AND RINGS 3,652.19 0.00 3,652.19 AP 00359693 07/01/2015 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 248.21 0.00 248.21 Al' 00359694 07/01/2015 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 46.20 0.00 46.20 AP 00359695 07/01/2015 CD PROPERTY SERVICES 805.00 0.00 805.00 AP 00359696 07/01/2015 CDW-G 598.32 0.00 598.32 AP 00359697 07/01/2015 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 81.00 0.00 81.00 AP 00359698 07/01/2015 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 262.44 524.88 787.32•" AP 00359699 07/01/2015 CINTAS CORP.#150 956.46 0.00 956.46 AP 00359700 07/01/2015 CLEAR COAST RESTORATION 11,081.29 0.00 11,081.29 AP 00359701 07/01/2015 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 1,595.00 0.00 1,595.00 AP 00359702 07/01/2015 C V W D 33.26 0.00 33.26 AP 00359703 07/01/2015 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,006.64 0.00 2,006.64 AP 00359704 07/01/2015 DATA ARC LLC 2,994.99 0.00 2,994.99 AP 00359705 07/01/2015 DE 131ASE,GENE 2,800.00 0.00 2,800.00 AP 00359706 07/01/2015 DEMPSTER, KERI 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00359707 07/01/2015 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,THE 0.00 450.00 450.00 AP 00359708 07/01/2015 DURATECH USA INC. 2,686.23 0.00 2,686.23 AP 00359709 07/01/2015 EARTHWORKS SOIL AMENDMENTS INC. 3,191.94 0.00 3,191.94 AP 00359710 07/01/2015 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 817.05 0.00 817.05 Al' 00359711 07/01/2015 EMBROIDME 403.55 0.00 403.55 AP 00359712 07/01/2015 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00359713 07/01/2015 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 76.15 0.00 76.15 AP 00359714 07/01/2015 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.73 0.00 16.73 AP 00359715 07/01/2015 FELICIANO,ANTHONY 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00359716 07/01/2015 FERNANDEZ,HANNAH 52.10 0.00 52.10 AP 00359717 07/01/2015 FIRST CLASS HEATING&AIR 5,500.00 0.00 5,500.00 AP 00359718 07/01/2015 FIRST CLASS HEATING&AIR 5,500.00 0.00 5,500.00 Al' 00359719 07/01/2015 FIRST CLASS HEATING&AIR 5,500.00 0.00 5,500.00 AP 00359720 07/01/2015 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 529.20 0.00 529.20 AP 00359721 07/01/2015 FLEET SERVICES INC. 181.39 0.00 181.39 AP 00359722 07/01/2015 ERASURE,MICHAEL 30.18 0.00 30.18 AP 00359723 07/01/2015 FUSION SIGN AND DESIGN 1,847.88 0.00 1,847.88 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA pg AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359724 07/01/2015 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 35.52 0.00 35.52 AP 00359725 07/01/2015 GEOGRAPHICS 1,168.56 0.00 1,168.56 AP 00359726 07/01/2015 GOOD YEAR SOCCER LEAGUE 464.00 0.00 464.00 AP 00359727 07/01/2015 GRAINGER 9,889.07 216.90 10,105.97*** AP 00359728 07/01/2015 GRAYBAR 60.36 0.00 60.36 AP 00359729 07/01/2015 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 1,047.00 0.00 1,047.00 AP 00359730 07/01/2015 GULF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPANY 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00359731 07/01/2015 HEARTSAVERS LLC 120.00 0.00 120.00 AP 00359732 07/01/2015 HEILIG,KELLY 363.00 0.00 363.00 AP 00359733 07/01/2015 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSOCIATES 15,248.33 0.00 15,248.33 AP 00359734 07/01/2015 HOLLIS,PRIMALYN 17.55 0.00 17.55 AP 00359735 07/01/2015 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 395.31 0.00 395.31 AP 00359736 07/01/2015 HOSE MAN INC 66.47 0.00 66.47 AP 00359737 07/01/2015 IMS INC 84.15 0.00 84.15 AP 00359738 07/01/2015 INDERWIESCHE,MATT 1,875.00 0.00 1,875.00 AP 00359739 07/01/2015 INLAND PRESORT&MAILING SERVICES 164.53 0.00 164.53 AP 00359740 07/01/2015 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 15,797.18 0.00 15,797.18 AP 00359741 07/01/2015 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 796.85 0.00 796.85 AP 00359742 07/01/2015 J AND S STRIPING CO INC 2,697.00 0.00 2,697.00 AP 00359743 07/01/2015 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 23.52 0.00 23.52 AP 00359744 07/01/2015 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 3,984.00 0.00 3,984.00 AP 00359745 07/01/2015 JRC HOUSING 8,477.00 0.00 8,477.00 AP 00359746 07/01/2015 JRC HOUSING 5,995.00 0.00 5,995.00 AP 00359747 07/01/2015 JRC HOUSING 4,895.00 0.00 4,895.00 AP 00359748 07/01/2015 K K WOODWORKING 107.90 0.00 107.90 AP 00359749 07/01/2015 KATAHDIN ENVIRONMENTAL 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00359750 07/01/2015 KENT HARRIS TRUCKING&MATERIALS 332.80 0.00 332.80 AP 00359751 07/01/2015 KRONOS INC 0.00 1,505.00 1,505.00 AP 00359752 07/01/2015 LEAL,RUTH 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00359753 07/01/2015 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 9,455.75 0.00 9,455.75 AP 00359754 07/01/2015 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00359755 07/01/2015 MARCO EQUIPMENT CO 1,693.35 0.00 1,693.35 AP 00359756 07/01/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 12,439.83 0.00 12,439.83 AP 00359757 07/01/2015 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 856.50 0.00 856.50 AP 00359758 07/01/2015 MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 143.85 0.00 143.85 AP 00359759 07/01/2015 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 484.59 0.00 484.59 AP 00359760 07/01/2015 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 98.02 0.00 98.02 AP 00359761 07/01/2015 MIDWEST TAPE 2,556.74 0.00 2,556.74 AP 00359762 07/01/2015 MORALES,MELISSA 149.00 0.00 149.00 AP 00359763 07/01/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 453.00 0.00 453.00 AP 00359764 07/01/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 798.41 0.00 798.41 AP 00359765 07/01/2015 MUSICSTAR 2,631.60 0.00 2,631.60 AP 00359766 07/01/2015 NAPA AUTO PARTS 6.63 0.00 6.63 AP 00359767 07/01/2015 NIGHTHAWK TOTAL CONTROL 44.58 0.00 44.58 AP 00359768 07/01/2015 NINYO&MOORE 11,789.00 0.00 11,789.00 AP 00359770 07/01/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 10,426.68 513.79 10,940.47*** AP 00359771 07/01/2015 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 10.80 0.00 10.80 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P10 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359772 07/01/2015 ONTRAC 39.49 0.00 39.49 AP 00359773 07/01/2015 PATTON SALES CORP 29.88 0.00 29.88 AP 00359774 07/01/2015 PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00359775 07/01/2015 PEPSI-COLA 666.00 0.00 666.00 AP 00359776 07/01/2015 POLCENE,PAIGE 189.00 0.00 189.00 AP 00359777 07/01/2015 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 172.76 172.76 AP 00359778 07/01/2015 PRO SALES GROUP INC 2,127.72 0.00 2,127.72 AP 00359779 07/01/2015 PROMOTIONS TEES& MORE 8,252.83 0.00 8,252.83 AP 00359780 07/01/2015 PSYCHOLOGICAL RESOURCES 0.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 AP 00359781 07/01/2015 PW GILLIBRAND INC 1.601.68 0.00 1,601.68 AP 00359782 07/01/2015 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 246.24 0.00 246.24 AP 00359783 07/01/2015 RED CHAPEL 241.97 0.00 241.97 AP 00359784 07/01/2015 REGENCY ENTERPRISES INC 6,265.08 0.00 6,265.08 AP 00359785 07/01/2015 IGNOBLE COMPANY 600,877.26 0.00 600,877.26 AP 00359786 07/01/2015 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 37,628.06 0.00 37,628.06 AP 00359787 07/01/2015 ROBLES, RAUL P 105.00 0.00 105.00 AP 00359788 07/01/2015 S.CALIF. MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDERATION 460.00 0.00 460.00 AP 00359789 07/01/2015 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 250.00 250.00 AP 00359790 07/01/2015 SC FUELS 0.00 5,281.78 5,281.78 AP 00359791 07/01/2015 SCMAF- INLAND VALLEYS 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00359792 07/01/2015 SCOTT,APRIL 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00359793 07/01/2015 SEALMASTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 420.01 0.00 420.01 AP 00359794 07/01/2015 SEYMOUR,RONALD 0.00 261.00 261.00 AP 00359795 07/01/2015 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 293.65 0.00 293.65 AP 00359796 07/01/2015 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 164.80 0.00 164.80 AP 00359797 07/01/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 165.12 46.10 211.22*** AP 00359805 07/01/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24,244.17 4,592.33 28,836.50*** AP 00359806 07/01/2015 SOUTHLAND SPORT'S OFFICIALS 529.00 0.00 529.00 AP 00359807 07/01/2015 SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC 894.00 0.00 894.00 AP 00359808 07/01/2015 SPINDOLA,I3EDA 596.85 0.00 596.85 AP 00359809 07/01/2015 STAPLETON,JOSHUA 0.00 229.22 229.22 Al' 00359810 07/01/2015 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 118.43 0.00 118.43 AP 00359811 07/01/2015 SUN BADGE CO 0.00 1,240.45 1,240.45 AP 00359812 07/01/2015 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00359813 07/01/2015 SUPERMARKET ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES 4,719.36 0.00 4,719.36 AP 00359814 07/01/2015 SWIFTY SIGN 0.00 1,706.40 1,706.40 AP 00359815 07/01/2015 TARGETSOLUTIONS 0.00 3,857.50 3,857.50 AP 00359816 07/01/2015 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 73.00 73.00 AP 00359817 07/01/2015 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 1,225.58 0.00 1,225.58 AP 00359818 07/01/2015 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 170.00 0.00 170.00 AP 00359819 07/01/2015 TORO TOWING 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00359820 07/01/2015 TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISORS ASSOC SOUTH 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00359821 07/01/2015 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 482.85 0.00 482.85 AP 00359822 07/01/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 15,045.73 0.00 15,045.73 AP 00359823 07/01/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1.005.13 0.00 1,005.13 AP 00359824 07/01/2015 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 340.23 0.00 340.23 AP 00359825 07/01/2015 VEND U COMPANY 241.27 0.00 241.27 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P11 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359826 07/01/2015 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 991.05 0.00 991.05 AP 00359827 07/01/2015 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 9,565.94 0.00 9,565.94 AP 00359829 07/01/2015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 5,091.13 1,936.17 7,027.30'" AP 00359830 07/01/2015 VISION ACCOCIATES INC 910.61 0.00 910.61 AP 00359831 07/01/2015 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 2,862.76 0.00 2,862.76 AP 00359832 07/01/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 9,572.71 0.00 9,572.71 AP 00359833 07/01/2015 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 291.57 0.00 291.57 AP 00359834 07/01/2015 WILSON AND BELL 141.88 0.00 141.88 AP 00359835 07/01/2015 WINZER CORPORATION 349.03 0.00 349.03 AP 00359836 07/01/2015 XL STORAGE 895.00 0.00 895.00 AP 00359837 07/01/2015 LA PUMA,DEBORAH WICKS 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00359838 07/01/2015 MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 8,742.00 0.00 8,742.00 AP 00359839 07/01/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,166.66 0.00 3,166.66 AP 00359840 07/01/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY EPOS 0.00 125.00 125.00 AP 00359841 07/01/2015 WHITSELL,JASON 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00359842 07/01/2015 ZFX INC 70.00 0.00 70.00 AP 00359843 07/01/2015 ABC LOCKSMITHS 279.00 0.00 279.00 AP 00359844 07/01/2015 AIRGAS USA LLC 894.40 0.00 894.40 AP 00359845 07/01/2015 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 564.30 0.00 564.30 AP 00359846 07/01/2015 CALSENSE 4,703.42 0.00 4.703.42 AP 00359847 07/01/2015 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 6.548.27 65.00 6,613.27 "' AP 00359849 07/01/2015 C V W D 50,151.21 0.00 50,151.21 AP 00359850 07/01/2015 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 282.78 0.00 282.78 AP 00359851 07/01/2015 EMCOR SERVICE 1,122.31 0.00 1.122.31 AP 00359852 07/01/2015 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 1,928.61 0.00 1,928.61 AP 00359853 07/01/2015 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 94.47 0.00 94.47 AP 00359854 07/01/2015 FASTENAL COMPANY 3,184.70 0.00 3,184.70 AP 00359855 07/01/2015 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 634.97 0.00 634.97 AP 00359856 07/01/2015 I IOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 17,378.64 0.00 17,378.64 AP 00359857 07/01/2015 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 1,505.24 0.00 1,505.24 Total City: $2,675,881.87 Total Fire: $248,307.27 Grand Total: $2,924,189.14 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: I I Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 P12 Co 1 5 _ m o N o Co top W W d ° = 'J N N t7 N r N m cc Q n rk o Z a o o r r r r C LL Ill 8 g u > Co L d o I g U 's o a¢ o >-o a U d a?1 C 5 > N r Q Q r r O1 N i 1 ry m N m o •Co ~ J N '- r N 001 >,C CC Y 0' O O r r r r co _ W ° o a E T (0 d U yI E F . E L` r r t^.1 0, m Vm n r W v >I y O CO m N 0 5 .0 a O ox C as C r r Co N 0 1'1 N 0 d 0 O y r co O) t Q E r n m co V d c 0, O t D N N e c ^ N O O O m m m m m 0 W E `o._ m m co r v N o m w x e�O O Ni r Cl O o Ly 0- r a nc 0 o d N d y V W O O m V 10 it In Q O J m 0 O N 01 1y 0 A 6 N c6 O 0 r • d 0 '•'• m 1 0 Of N O O CO Q 01 O. d V O t7 Of O (V m N - E •L M rn v v a_ o m 0 co 0 y C N V N r 0 V■Y N d 0/ oa o J E a3 C d 1n .,_v O m £ — .d. 0, n E o 0 co 7 N 0 vni m yt w as (n c 0 n 0 >c m o 2 o e L atd V m O o o O {y d ID 1y •o •e C d j CO . N O W O 0) } % U to ,03 yt = > m ry n vni Co v m 3 LL ' 2 o of 6 r N 0 N _N «m LL O o co V o O O o CO € m o C a N co- N r N 0 0 N < c > Y N C > n O O N O 6 4L C C N O o L . C c co C'Z m d d r" c d to L 0 o m co O 0 o o p Ol N an (0 E E S a- o N o o o o ri c 10 y 0 7 m N °O °O °O,°O A C °O N r C CO c o l0 6 0 6 0 W rn CO c N V N °O o o (ay 0) to V a_O N m N r N 0 L 0 0 O O d N V N c O d O n E N a n u ° to NU too O N C d C d 0 c - L N~ > 0 N N d N 0 w E1 n r c 0 N U 9 it p00 N °O = m�. 0 c 0 o. C c 0 g E W N E °O O° d d._ �O�\ 7 JO U U J t Z Co 10 m c c) • U C 0 aN m O o o� E c o N d d o._ H O n U 0 1. W c ._ w w 01 m C .N..�n co b ZF ! K — m ri o IL: C T N .., O O. < t. : D � & LdWCO ° c co � c IA Q ¢U d c...2 rn N m Z d } 0 d L C m C o ?) ''W.F E �rn a a m E 111 p1 > ,�, N C m TA a g y � ° '^ m �' d r Q a1 Ili 0 o m E o- d d d CL LL 1- 2 0 E I- 0 Q W — > 0 P13 L•.o. 0 n 0 m m m 0 0 0 0 n o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 m — 'C co o 0 0 0 00 o 0 o o 0 0 0 coo 0 00 0 Q o ei 0) m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N n m m r r t� o 0 o r n 0 ° m m m o o m n n LL 0. O r r N N (` N O CO CO (7 N N N O 2 rr.r > to 0 0 0 a r Q 0 m m 0 0 N a 0 N ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .- 0 O nl a 2 o y'C r r m N m m N m Q Q N CO m CO Q OI OI Q p N O n N N Y p a ,"..a 0 n n a CO Q Ct N n N a CO Q Ct n 0 m 0 d Cr m o 0 Q (o m o 0 r N- 00. 0) 000000 0 0 d ❑� r r r r .- r r r r r r r r d 2 m Of ° O N N N 0 0 0 0 0 O n N O O N 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 O m m 0 0 00 0 N N Co 0 0 n 0 0 0 N N O O O Q 0 O N N N N r m C C) CO 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 N N O r N V1 N N N•O O O O r r r r C C C C C C C C C C C (0 C C C C C C C CO a ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Q Q ¢ ¢ ¢v o 0 2 '00.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 O cocoina6 0000000000 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 r q N N O W r CO CO 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 O n N O r n m N am O ° r 0 m O Q Q m ' Q Q 0 m O N 0 0 0 0 m 0 O n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 CO Q CO O n O N 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 m 0 O 0 0 O CO O O 1 ti ° O N N O 6 O 6 O a O n O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 6 O m A N 0 C0j C0 aR CO 0 0 0 0 CO N 0 0 r O 0 0 0 0 in O co X 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 (O m 0 O r_ ° 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 o O co N m m O m 0 0 0 O) 0 0 0 O O ° 0 0 0 0 m O O O n n O) OI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O m O O O O a n O 0 CO m m a O a CO Q co ° ° O a O m O Y) O m O O m N N V 0 0 N N N O Q r C) N N r N r N r C r r N N N r N N a O Q a 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 o O o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 CO O O O N O O O O 0 O It 0 0 q O O N N N O m O Q O 0 N 0 O 0 0 Q Q r N N m N O O > O) m O O 0 0 O) (O 0 0 at-- Co CO 0 O) C) 0 n O) O N O m N- n 0 m N N Q CJ 0 0 0 C) 0 m a 0 M 0 0 0 N a N 0 n In It .4+ O O M N 0 ° O) O N m r N N O) 10 0 M n N 0 N e r r N. n 0 m 0) 0r0) 000/ 0303000 0) ° ° m 01.- 0) V) 0 0 m m Q Q a o 0 m 0 o Q 0 ° o m m 0 0 0 Q a a a 0 0 V0 2 N N N O O r CO N r r r N N r N N r r N N r {+j N N ▪ • f d y C a • N .+ C 4) N N r ° ° r 0000000000000000000 ° ° ° D 0 m m 6 6 CO N N a o 0 0 0 o ° 000 a oo o ° o o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a 0 o 6 O C O > m CO o O 0000000 ,300000000000 0 0 0 ..7. as N O) m N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C ✓ C I o o M 0 o O o 0 0 o O o o O o 0 o O O o o O o 0 0 0 C. N n 0 0000000000000000000 o O a as y 0 m m v v o o 0 0 0 L000000000001.0 m °0 0 c 2 ' M N N N Q Q N C) N N r N N N r M N r N N N r N N a d 2 d C o ° � 0 L▪L 0 0 M M M Q a N M CO CO CO a 0 CO Q Q CO CO N N CO . O O C 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U a. L L LL L❑ N C V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CO N r r (' (� 0 0 r no 0 0 m m m m m n O -J 0 r r r N M CO N ° N M CO r N NN- ...: LL CL o' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° °0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ch i r I (0 m o me c2. O 0 0 N • 03 Iv H n 7 Y Y Y Y Y Y 0 0 0 N 00 Z 0 Q ZZ¢ Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y Y Y Y U U U m N Z m m m m m m < < < < < < H H H 0 0 N N Q < ry H 0 H H H H H H m m m m m m 2 2 2 0 ® N N m M w ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z < < < < z w 71 W W W W W W < < < < < < < < < < > < CE IY CC m m X0000000001- 1- O H 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 U J J J J 2 E 2 >- LL 2 2 2 2 2 2 W W W W W W W W W J JCCCJ J W CC m CC CC m K 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 H H H H 0 2 0 y Z O0 Y ° < < < < < < 000000000 < < < <_ _ _ _ _ 0 0 Ir O w 0 z i LL LL LL 11 LL LL Z Z Z Z E x A o < 0 JQ JQ Q Q Q. . . . . .Q< Q Q Q JQ J Q QQ QJQ Q J JQ Q JQ Q 0 QJQ 0 O J < z < K K K K 4a R' K R' m 4a K K K R R' 0.' R' K 4a < 5 < � p 2 W w W W w W W w W W w w W w w w w w w a W V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C ❑ C 0 10 Z 0 w w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W a W 0 9 D .0 LL LL LL LL U LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL u LL LL LL LL 9 U 3 0 0 0 0 a_ a a a c > 3 # V m N O 0 CC c c N a C o 3 C E LL o o 0 0 0. > 0 O 0 ° U M M m N 0 N- N CO CO Q m n N N (QO M CO 0 0 O O E o° < oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a a 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 H 0 3 O c = 0 M C Y .+0 lc 0 O >. T .c C 0 N 0 c U 0 m Of _ O < Q (°n a CO y Z m N ") 0y 0 C) o N NN vn) N a CO n < ° d a N U U U 0 w F K o m a vii < Y N (Wf d a o N 00 `) W w W W W W co m co m < ¢ 0000 000 min V1 O 4J 0 fA 4) th M M CMi CO) CMi N (M+l (7 n n (On e) M M M M m CO co 0 3 O > A Y d U J 0) 0. Cl) LL M M C) M M M M M C) M M M M M M M M M M H 0 cc P14 N A'f, 0 0 0 0 w a 0 =0 N N N N N C ¢ n CO CO CO o 0 0 N 0 W 0 0 - oa 0 a. EF ° ui - cc q y O N Q 0 O O N n 0 a CO OD CO 05 r r a 5 0 0 O r 00 0 0 Co Yr 001 N N n N n N 0 CO C- N O r r 0 r O to to co co T Q Q Q Q 0 O O E D d N r Co 0 0 d q 0 °n N n m .ate N N r )- O 0 J N 0 CN'1 N 1� ' OQ1 M To> 0 O N O O co N V m y N O O 0 N V N o 0 6 0 N O 0 p o 1+0i 0 C0') o 0 00 0 0 r r r ry n o 6 O O O O O Co • a o n m 0 o 0 q O 0 N O Q en 1'. > N O m n 01 Q V n O1 r .- h Q 0 1� N n INn CO F. O O 0 0 7 2 r N n y▪ C E ▪ N 0 C d 0 N s 00 00 0O 00 00 00 00 0 O ° C 0 > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 w. la — N o o O o 0 0 0 r ✓ C I d m ° m 100 00 00 00 N d (Q y Q Co Co 0 O O O N O em O .M 2 0 d C 0 c O .=L d d Q 1'1 a 0 N/L LO ` N N N CO O O N Q O O r r N N LL d O 0 0 0 Y O O O O 0 0 0 C c 0 10 im U a y m Qm N O N a to N w U 0 CO 0 W ' - ti O J W a n W 0 0 0 J O < 0 Z U U OF a r Z K U y Z U en OU W n ea U W a N > y o d Z Q JQ d 0 x W F N Q< K K Q u. zce D i 0 > 0 W Z m U K .o 0 0 3 $ o O F a .0 = > 3 0 0 . 0 E y CJ 0 r N r • 0 2 0 Q a C O O O O O N N 0 cp SS 0 o 0 0 CO Z q m 0 d O N Q J o. 0 O N O < O V O 0 0 0. •C Q 0 r n n 0 Cl n = n 0 O) Q 0 W O U f Pl. C.1 `O n c K waP155 o cc ¢ m LL 1 O a > o io It Le m° O a K CL f a o m - 0 0 a m n A °m o IS) oo o pn m q 01 N O O 10 R N m 0 m n o m m 0 ei 0 v a o o at O N 7 N - - n A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CC A O O O O O 0 0 0 0 - ; O O O O O O O O O o@ y °o a Ea .- o A t m o m m a - 0 O m at � N CO- N It 0 N N O O 00 CO O O O 0 CO O O O O O 0 co O O O IO A o O O V O O O O O V t C 0 O OOD f o oo 0 0 fo a. 0 m o 0 O In m 00 o Vol V N a m 10 v4, o }I Y O A N N ,_ - V y C M d O• OI H>` —3 V C a 7) d l0 m 7 D E .ar, O C O O N N EL O •' M V m N N N 1L • A O CD 0 L O O A O O O • a a N r �jO m o0 0 00 It) a N N O 0 N 0 o 0 N ._ .- C y 7 0 z a a S K K U. 0 0 I Q ) O O W Z z O 0 E• 0 0 m E E to LL W Z Z Z > U 0 0 0 0 LL W W W CO E Z 3 0 0 0 3 3 A 3 3 o E z o t t t o o o o 0 E Q a E m a a a a a I- CO Q N in Z y N 0 N N to• T O _T O 0 Ul 111 IL 0 0 C OJ L 0 LL LL LL o C 2 0 2 C it C C t C C E U. z 0 a N 0 N U R. t N 0 o C g O ¢ a N G O O 0 d ` Y) CO . N o o C CO 0 M > y - i• ' N C C To N o U 0 0 m Z eq OI 0 ¢ m m 2 m A W o CO 0 N ° a% a 0 e, 0 N U 00 '0 00 0 C < Q N C C, 5 f7 Yl lA L ` N N d 0 0 O• J N R N LL N cin m f 2 0 K P16 a) E a) 'C -0o C CU — a) Cr) O) C (0 C U U J to � o <D 4 U V N Q •L cu N � d 0 V O s- 0• •N a O z • EN a) ' O O CNi CU 87•0 C h � o CO co O `oco • a a� U C) 0 U) t C.) C � 0 e. CO aco �' j cv N (0 a) L I- co a) N >, C — o 0 C o_co QUccoo To a) a) LL P17 -o d d 4 E a w z to � _ 0 ti _ ID 1-. v a C.) - .- �L w N °' w E v O C N V' d • O CO 4. 0 ' _ \ d W f+ �L ° to. +� (0 O N t eM. C) a) CI a N N c L R LL I= M CD 03• C = > Q O 6. 3 r = 3 y E 0 O 0 d O a M N C s ti co C o - - - - 1::' a, I c a) c C° O t , = OQ 0 0 zg o - o o c o O 0 0 0 O O O O O ui n O u O U) O :4-.M M N N . a- V a) H •w' • 'i w to v E O w O Z• 4 P18 cbt-es STAFF REPORT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT • RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst III Subject: APPROVAL OF A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (PSA) BETWEEN ALFREDO MACIAS AND HILDA F. HORDYK, TRUSTEES OF THE MACIAS/HORDYK FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST, DATED MAY 30, 2003 (SELLERS) AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (BUYER) FOR THE ACQUISITION OF 0.49 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, WEST OF VINEYARD, KNOWN AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0208-091-72, IN THE AMOUNT OF $437,500, PLUS A CLOSING COST CONTINGENCY OF $25,000, FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 3288501-5600 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Fire Board approve a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) between Alfredo Macias and Hilda F. Hordyk, Trustees of the Macias/Hordyk Family Revocable Trust, Dated May 30, 2003 (Sellers) and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District/Buyer) for the acquisition of approximately 0.49 acres located on the north side of San Bernardino Road, west of Vineyard, known as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number: 0208-091-72, for $437,500, plus a closing cost contingency of $25,000, to be funded from Account Number 3288501-5600 and authorize the City Manager, the Fire Chief and Fire District Counsel the authority to make administrative modifications that are deemed necessary to complete the transaction. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Sellers are the owner of approximately 0.49 acres of land on the north side of San Bernardino Road, west of Vineyard and have agreed to sell the site to the District. With approval from the Fire Board on June 3, 2015, the District initiated negotiations with the Sellers. The District sent an offer letter to purchase the property on June 25, 2015, and on June 30, 2015, the Sellers agreed to sell the site for $437,500 with several business deal points common to this type of transaction. The District intends to purchase the property for a public use, namely for fire safety and protection services for re-building the San Bernardino Road Fire Station (172) at this location. P19 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT BETWEEN MACIAS-HORDYK AND THE DISTRICT July 15, 2015 PAGE 2 On July 1, 2015, District staff updated the Board, during Closed Session, regarding the negotiations and the Board approved entering into a Purchase and Sale Agreement and beginning the due diligence phase by conducting environmental testing on the site. The District will retain an environmental firm to prepare a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. District staff recommends the Fire Board approve the Purchase and Sale Agreement between Alfredo Macias and Hilda F. Hordyk, Trustees of the Macias/Hordyk Family Revocable Trust, Dated May 30, 2003 (Sellers) and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District/Buyer) for the acquisition of approximately 0.49 acres located on the north side of San Bernardino Road, west of Vineyard, known as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number: 0208-091-72, for $437,500, plus a closing cost contingency of $25,000, to be funded from Account Number 3288501-5600 and authorize the City Manager, the Fire Chief and Fire District Counsel the authority to make administrative modifications that are deemed necessary to complete the transaction. Respectfully submitted, 1/71- Mike Costello Attachments: Vicinity Map 0 t NI w _it P)0 MONTE VISTA ST. MUNTE VISTA ST. N z ¢ ti 1_ f w J N 1 w ce I I I UPLAND Ny r Z S w o BASELINE AVE w r n • > ¢ ri 5::i. iE w Q ¢ / CHURCH ST. 7 HILL ,c$' I �. SAN BERt`,ARDIN❑ RD ° z 42 RC 1 - U w it/ o —Li LEVUN S i wo II CI itt =_- ' 3 .. � ik‘ > . . .......II CITY LIMIT 7 if t Q . / _ ° w f 1— w w P SITE � i . V I �CUCAMUNGA GAUSTI PARK . 411.11%11111111111114 ONTARIO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4 6 _et— Glom'4041 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT VW �:`� APN 208-091-72 J / N.T.B. n P21 STAFF REPORT *41 • FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst III Subject: APPROVAL OF A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (PSA) BETWEEN DAVID J. AND ELIZABETH F. WALTERS, TRUSTEES OF THE DAVID J. AND ELIZABETH F. WALTERS LIVING TRUST, DATED DECEMBER 30, 2013 (SELLERS) AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (BUYER) FOR THE ACQUISITION OF 0.23 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, WEST OF VINEYARD, KNOWN AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0208-091-36, IN THE AMOUNT OF $437,500, PLUS A CLOSING COST CONTINGENCY OF $25,000, FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 3288501-5600 AND APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $125,000 TO BE FUNDED FROM FIRE DISTRICT CAPITAL LAND PURCHASE RESERVE FUND BALANCE TO ACCOUNT NO. 3288501-5600 RECOMMENDATION • It is recommended that the Fire Board approve a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) between David J. and Elizabeth F. Walters, Trustees of the David J. and Elizabeth F. Walters Living Trust, Dated December 30, 2013 (Sellers) and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District/Buyer) for the acquisition of approximately 0.23 acres located on the north side of San Bernardino Road, west of Vineyard, known as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number: 0208-091-36, for $437,500, plus a closing cost contingency of $25,000, to be funded from Account Number 3288501-5600 and approve an appropriation in the amount of $125,000 from Fire District Capital Land Purchase Reserve Fund Balance to Account No. 3288501-5600, and authorize the City Manager, the Fire Chief and Fire District Counsel the authority to make administrative modifications that are deemed necessary to complete the transaction. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Sellers are the owner of approximately 0.23 acres of land on the north side of San Bernardino Road, west of Vineyard and have agreed to sell the site to the District. With approval from the Fire Board on June 3, 2015, the District initiated negotiations with the Sellers. The District sent an offer letter to purchase the property on June 25, 2015, and on June 30, 2015, the Sellers agreed to sell the site for $437,500 with several business P22 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT BETWEEN WALTERS AND THE DISTRICT July 15, 2015 PAGE 2 deal points common to this type of transaction. The District intends to purchase the property for a public use, namely for fire safety and protection services for re-building the San Bernardino Road Fire Station (172) at this location. On July 1, 2015, District staff updated the Board, during Closed Session, regarding the negotiations and the Board approved entering into a Purchase and Sale Agreement and beginning the due diligence phase by conducting environmental testing on the site. The District will retain an environmental firm to prepare a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. District staff recommends the Fire Board approve the Purchase and Sale Agreement between David J. and Elizabeth F. Walters, Trustees of the David J. and Elizabeth F. Walters Living Trust, Dated December 30, 2013 (Sellers) and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District/Buyer) for the acquisition of approximately 0.23 acres located on the north side of San Bernardino Road, west of Vineyard, known as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number: 0208-091-36, for $437,500, plus a closing cost contingency of $25,000, to be funded from Account Number 3288501-5600 and approve an appropriation in the amount of $125,000 from Fire District Capital Land Purchase Reserve Fund Balance to Account No. 3288501-5600, and authorize the City Manager, the Fire Chief and Fire District Counsel the authority to make administrative modifications that are deemed necessary to complete the transaction. Respectfully submitted, 0 Mike Costello Attachments: Vicinity Map it I w H > > Q Q MONTE VISTA ST, MONTE VISTA ST. C . H r >- z / Id i z I UPLAND ce w ° Q U m J I / BASELINE AVM w �� n > , > / w Pj U Ili 2 W Q�/ Q / CHURCH ST, r I SUR Li� 'w / > U VJ ! Q tJ G. •y '; z lliJ HILL ,Q-P �-�,� SAN BERNARDIN❑ RD x z 41 ce 42 q- - U 0 u x i ji u p I Di VON S- d a i j _iii 5 a o Q 1 �_ in ling i > o m W . [I \-CITY LIMIT 0 J Q CO m I 2 f K U Q W S ITE r 41%4,14%4000 . , I-(-----)CUCAMONGA GAUSTI PARK ONTARIO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA / 1% w PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT �`• re, J APN 208-091-36 •`4. mi.s. J n P24;4 STAFF REPORT f'h RANCHO CUCADIONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT LJ RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (CFD NO. 85-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WITH 5% REDUCTION. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Fire Board adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax levy for Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fiscal Year 2015/2016. Pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Facilities Act of 1982, the Fire Board is authorized to annually levy the tax rate for fire protection services. BACKGROUND On December 10, 1985, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services. The special tax is necessary to provide the required operation and maintenance revenue specific to ongoing fire protection and life safety services within the CFD. This voter approved Mello-Roos CFD and associated special tax was first initiated in Fiscal Year 1986/87. At the time that CFD No. 85-1 was formed, the Mello-Roos Act provided that the Board of Directors, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 85-1, may, by ordinance, levy the special taxes at the rate and apportion such special taxes in the manner specified in the Rate and Method. Each year since CFD No. 85-1 was formed the Board of Directors has adopted an ordinance to levy the special taxes within CFD No. 85-1. The Mello-Roos Act has subsequently been amended to provide that the legislative body of a community facilities district may initially provide for the levy of a special tax by ordinance and through the enactment of such ordinance provide, by resolution, for the levy of the special tax in the current or future tax years. On May 18, 2011, an ordinance was introduced authorizing the levy of special taxes within Community Facilities District No. 85-1 by resolution rather than by ordinance. The ordinance was adopted and became effective July 1, 2011. P25 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR MELLO- ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (CFD NO. 85-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WITH 5%REDUCTION. JULY 15,2015 PAGE 2 ANALYSIS It has been determined that there are sufficient revenues available in the CFD to meet all financial obligations; hence, there will be a 5% reduction in the actual assessment rate for the CFD for fiscal year 2015/16. The maximum tax rate which could be levied is adjusted per the March Los Angeles- Riverside-Orange Co. Consumer Price Index (CPI). The attached Resolution submitted for your approval establishes the recommended annual special tax to be levied in Fiscal Year 2015/16 as identified in Exhibit "A". The maximum special tax which could be levied is illustrated in Exhibit "B" of the Resolution, utilizing the lesser of: (a) changes in cost of living (CPI); or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code. Changes in cost of living (CPI) for 2015/16 are calculated at 1.0051% while changes in per capital cost of living and changes in population resulted in a calculation of 1.0496%. Therefore, the lesser of the two calculations, the changes in cost of living (CPI) of 1.0051% is utilized to determine the maximum special tax rate. During the budget workshop held on June 11, 2015, the proposed CFD No. 85-1 budget was reviewed by the Board. The proposed special tax levy rate for Fiscal Year 2015/16 is listed below. FISCAL RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL YEAR DWELLINGS PROPERTIES PROPERTIES 2014/15 $151.71 per DU $151.71 per AC + 0.082 SF $151.71 per AC + 0.100 SF Proposed 2015/16 $144.12 per DU $144.12 per AC + 0.078 SF $144.12 per AC + 0.095 SF Respectfully submitted, Mike Costello Fire Chief Attachment Resolution No. FD 15-017 Annual Report CFD 85-1 Map P26 RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body"), (a) initiated proceedings in 1985 to (i) form the Foothill Fire Protection District Community Facilities District No. 85-1 ("CFD No. 85-1") and (ii) authorize the levy of special taxes within CFD No. 85-1; (b) held a public hearing regarding the foregoing and formed CFD No. 85-1; and (c) conducted an election on December 10, 1985 and more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition authorizing the levy of special taxes in CFD No. 85-1, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by ordinance, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the annual levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said community facilities district at the rate and apportion the special tax in the manner specified in the resolution adopted pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 53318 of the Government Code), except that this Board of Directors may levy the special tax at a lower rate; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors desires to levy a special tax in the Community Facilities District for the fiscal year 2015/16. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1: Levy of Special Tax. That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year (2015/16) for the referenced District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 2: Exempt Properties. That properties or entities of the State, Federal or other local governments shall be exempt from such special tax. SECTION 3: Use of Special Tax. That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: P27 (a) The construction, acquisition, expansion and/or rehabilitation of public facilities, within or for the benefit of the Community Facilities District generally described as follows: Fire protection and suppression facilities and appurtenances, including; equipment, real property and other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or longer. (b) The services to be provided within the Community Facilities District are generally described as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations and maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection within the Community Facilities District. (c) The repayment of advances and loans. The special tax shall be used solely for the purposes specified above and for no other purpose. SECTION 4: Annual Adjustment in Maximum Special Tax. Pursuant to authorization of the qualified electorate, this Board of Directors hereby declares that it shall annually adjust the maximum special tax based upon the lesser of: (a) changes in cost of living; or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code occurring within the Community Facilities District in the immediately preceding fiscal year. (c) The maximum authorized special tax rates are set forth in the attached referenced and incorporated Exhibit "B" SECTION 5: Collection of Special Tax. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes. Resolution No. FD 15-017 - Page 2 of 5 P28 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the 15th day of July 2015. Executed this 15th day of July 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 15-017 - Page 3 of 5 P29 EXHIBIT "A" SPECIAL TAX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ANNUAL STRUCTURES SPECIAL TAX Residential ($144.12) per DU Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 ($144.12) 3 DU: 2.25 ($144.12) 4 DU: 2.65 ($144.12) 5-14 DU: 2.65 ($144.12) + {.35 (TU - 4) ($144.12)} 15-30 DU: 6.15 ($144.12) + {.30 (TU - 14) ($144.12)) 31-80 DU: 10.65 ($144.12) + {.25 (TU - 30) ($144.12)) 81 - up DU: 23.15 ($144.12) + {.20 (TU - 80) ($144.12)) Commercial ($144.12) per acre + $.078 per SF Industrial ($144.12) per acre + $.095 per SF NOTE: DU = Dwelling Unit TU = Total Units SF = Square Foot Reduction Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. Resolution No. FD 15-017 - Page 4 of 5 P30 EXHIBIT "B" MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 IN FISCAL YEAR 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PER CAPITA COST MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX OF LIVING CHANGE 2014/2015 BASE FOR 2015 1.0051% $156.12 DU $156.92 DU MAXIMUM ANNUAL STRUCTURES SPECIAL TAX Residential ($156.92) per DU Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 ($156.92) 3 DU: 2.25 ($156.92) 4 DU: 2.65 ($156.92) 5-14 DU: 2.65 ($156.92) + {.35 (TU - 4)($156.92)} 15-30 DU: 6.15 ($156.92) + {.30 (TU - 14)($156.92)} 31-80 DU: 10.65 ($156.92) + {.25 (TU - 30)($156.92)} 81-up DU: 23.15 ($156.92) + (.20 (TU - 80)($156.92)) Commercial ($156.92) per acre + 0.082per SF Industrial ($156.92) per acre + 0.101 per SF NOTE: DU = Dwelling Unit TU = Total Units SF = Square Foot Reduction Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. Resolution No. FD 15-017 - Page 5 of 5 P31 Resolution No. FD 15-017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY 2015 P32 Resolution No. FD 15-017 BACKGROUND On December 10, 1985, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District") voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit and to annually adjust the special tax and appropriations limit based upon changes in the cost of living and changes in population. The district is bounded generally on the north by the 210 Freeway, on the east by Etiwanda Ave. on the south by Fourth Street and on the west by Archibald Avenue. The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted for(a) changes in cost of living (CPI); or (b) changes in the cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. It has been determined that there are sufficient revenues available in the CFD to meet all financial obligations without an increase to the CFD for fiscal year 2015/16. Hence, a 5% reduction was implemented for fiscal year 2015/16. The maximum tax rate which could be levied is adjusted per the March Los Angeles- Riverside-Orange Co. Consumer Price Index (CPI). FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 The change,in the Cost of Living (CPI) is 1.0051% for Fiscal Year 2015/16. P33 Resolution No. FD 15-017 FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 STRUCTURES ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RESIDENTIAL $144.12 PER DU MULTI-FAMILY 2DU: 1.75($144.12) 3DU: 2.25($144.12) 4DU: 2.65($144.12) 5-14 DU: 2.65($144.12) + {.35(TU-4) (144.12)} 15-30 DU: 6.15($144.12) + {.30(TU-14) (144.12)} 31-80 DU: 10.65($144.12) + {.25(TU-30) (144.12)} 81-UP DU: 23.15($144.12) + {.20(TU-80) (144.12)} COMMERCIAL ($144.12) per acre+ $0.078 per sqft. INDUSTRIAL ($144.12) per acre + $0.095 per sqft. P34 Resolution No. FD 15-017 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: COMMUNICATIONS $ 292,190.00 FIRE ADMINISTRATION, $ 614,880.00 OTHER SERVICES $4,716,390.00 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0.00 • $5,623,460.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 27,050.00 DELINQUENCIES $ 94,660.00 FEES $ 3,600.00 REIMBURSEMENTS $ 0.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCE $ 0.00 SPECIAL TAX $ 5,906,400.00 $6,031,710.00 P35 O - ^ CO *at +.+ E "i O a',' Zi co V .4' ° a (..)Q L 1 l!! Ay� o c� � 0 1 1:1)) IZ?li u-, e u. j,,,,N ,h,, 2 ‘,.._ ..) = Q 111116:, Ay 18e3 "c5 Ay epulAM3 r... _ Ay epue,NR3 • w .-. ' o i dill ,` I E -- 4 F ` ..... E �Iell_J0Rea 1 Q I �I V ny Jalsayooa ~ Ay Jaisatpo8 i y ua ' n �!II!W �_� AV ual!II!W II I 1 i Ay uaneH ` ;; Ay uaneH Ay esowaaH - _ Ay esouuaH J 7 I'Ay Megl43N - — -- — Ay plegl4wy AV ueW1aH i Ay ueWlel-I f la �( Ay pJeau!n IS ue!lawe0 l pli iil ..0—e... ,,' .iiii,H1,1 CC 8A0Jo I 1IiIiItih 1 -0 0) ni 11'11111i/1i 78 1 }0I ,11; N a. _ " 111'1 A 11ii:� If aza: la bit P36 STAFF REPORT h RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT biteJ RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief '(fi • By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (CFD NO. 88-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 WITH 5% REDUCTION. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Fire board adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax levy for Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2015/16. Pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Facilities Act of 1982, the Fire Board is authorized to annually levy the tax rate for fire protection services. BACKGROUND On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board adopted an Ordinance authorizing the annual levy of a special tax in CFD 88-1. The Ordinance authorized the District, by Resolution, to annually levy the special tax for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, purchase of equipment and operations and maintenance costs for fire protection services. This voter approved CFD and associated special tax was first initiated in Fiscal Year 1989/90. Fiscal Year 2015/16 is the twenty-sixth (26th) consecutive year the District has levied a special tax to provide required revenues for capital improvements (land, fire station facility, equipment) and fire protection services (personnel, operations and maintenance (O&M)) within this CFD. Accordingly, the Fiscal Year 2015/16 budget includes fully burdened personnel costs associated with existing memorandums of understanding between the District and its bargaining units as well as all related operations and maintenance costs, and capital improvements. ANALYSIS For Fiscal Year 2015/16, staff has determined that there are sufficient revenues available to meet all financial obligations; hence, there will be a 5% reduction in the actual assessment rate for the CFD for fiscal year 2015/16. The proposed fiscal year 2015/16 special tax levy will cover only a portion of the ongoing personnel and fire station O&M costs within the CFD; all remaining costs are covered by the Fire General-Fund. The attached Resolution submitted for your approval establishes the recommended annual special tax to be levied in Fiscal Year 2015/16, and is identified in Exhibit "A". The maximum special tax P37 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANN UAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (CFD NO. 88-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 WITI-I 50/0 REDUTION. JULY 15,2015 PAGE 2 which could be levied has been adjusted utilizing the State of California, Department of Finance methodology for adjusting appropriations limits for State and Local Governments and for adjusting the maximum special tax rate that could be levied and is illustrated in Exhibit "B" of the Resolution,. The recommended special tax levy remains at less than half the special tax which could be levied, with the exception of the vacant land rate. During the budget workshop held on June 11, 2015, the proposed CFD budget was reviewed. Respectfully submitted, 611` 1 Mike Costello Fire Chief Attachment 1. Resolution No. FD 15-018 2. Annual Report 3. CFD 88-1 Map P38 RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This community facilities district shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by ordinance, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said community facilities district, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year and to adjust the maximum special tax authorization to be levied. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year(2015/16) for the referenced District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: P39 A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness, if any; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds, including sinking funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, including the administration of the special tax levy; D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: That the maximum authorized special tax rates for all developed properties are hereby adjusted pursuant to Ordinance No. 17. The maximum authorized special tax rates are set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "B". SECTION 6: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 7: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 8: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "public improvements," "special tax" or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 9: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. • Resolution No. FD 15-018 - Page 2 of 5 P4O PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15'" day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the 15th day of July 2015. Executed this 15th day of July 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 15-018 - Page 3 of 5 P41 EXHIBIT "A" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 SPECIAL TAX LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 SPECIAL TAX LEVY SPECIAL TAX LEVY TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $463.24 $440.08 (more than 3590 SF) B. Residential Class II $356.94 $339.09 (3077 to 3589 SF) C. Residential Class II $284.09 $269.89 (2564 to 3076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $248.26 $235.85 (2308 to 2563 SF) E. Residential Class V $214.97 $204.22 (2051 to 2307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $195.79 $186.00 (1795 to 2050 SF) G. Residential Class VII $176.58 $167.75 (less than 1795 SF) Commercial/Industrial Property $712.77 per acre or$0.064 $677.13 per acre or$0.061 per sqft of building area, per sqft of building area, whichever is greater. whichever is greater. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200 per lot or parcel $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre $10.00 per acre SF = Square Feet Resolution No. FD 15-018 - Page 4 of 5 P42 EXHIBIT "B" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 DEVELOPED PROPERTY MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $1,116.51 $1,171.89 (more than 3590 SF) B. Residential Class II $856.14 $898.61 (3077 to 3589 SF) C. Residential Class III $683.22 $717.11 (2564 to 3076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $598.85 $628.55 (2308 to 2563 SF) E. Residential Class V $512.46 $537.88 (2051 to 2307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $473.33 $496.81 (1795 to 2050 SF) G. Residential Class VII $428.03 $449.26 (less than 1795 SF) H. Commercial/Industrial Property $1,718.43 per acre or $1,803.66 per acre or $0.1389 per sqft of bldg $0.14579 per sqft of building area, whichever is greater. area, whichever is greater. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200.00 per lot or parcel $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre $10.00 per acre SF = Square Feet NOTE: Escalation of maximum special rate. Calculation formula Fiscal Year 2015/16 Pop. Change *CPI 1.10% X 1.0382 = 1.0496 `CPI - California Per Capita Personal Income Resolution No. FD 15-018 - Page 5 of 5 P43 Resolution No. FD 15-018 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY 2015 P44 Resolution No. FD 15-018 BACKGROUND On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989,the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District) adopted an Ordinance authorizing the District, by Resolution to annual levy a special tax in CFD No. 88-1 for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, and purchase of equipment and operations and maintenance costs for fire protection services. CFD No. 88-1 is located within the boundaries of Highland, Cherry, Day Creek Channel and the San Bernardino National Forest. For Fiscal Year 2015/16, staff has determined that there are sufficient revenues available to meet all financial obligations; hence, there will be a 5% reduction in the actual assessment rate for the CFD for fiscal year 2015/16. The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted for (a) changes in cost of living (CPI); or (b) changes in the cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. The change in the cost of living and changes in population is 1.0496% for Fiscal Year 2015-2016. P45 Resolution No. FD 15-018 FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 DEVELOPED A. Residential Class I $440.08/SFD B. Residential Class 2 $339.09/SFD C. Residential Class 3 $269.89/SFD D. Residential Class 4 $235.85/SFD E. Residential Class 5 $204.22/SFD F. Residential Class 6 $186.00/SFD G. Residential Class 7 $167.75/SFD H. Commercial/Industrial $677.13/ACRE or $0.061/ SQFT or whichever is greater APPROVED $200.00/LOT OR PARCEL UNDEVELOPED $10.00/ACRE P46 Resolution No. FD 15-018 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: COMMUNICATIONS $ 73,630.00 FIRE ADMINISTRATION, $ 190,180.00 OTHER SERVICES $ 1,946,040.00 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0.00 $2,209,850.00 SOURCES: TRANSFER FROM FIRE FUND $1,009,850.00 DELINQUENCIES $ 14,550.00 FEES $ 1,120.00 REIMBURSEMENTS $ 0.00 SPECIAL TAX $1,184,330.00 $2,209,850.00 P47 ` O a) 00 U `, CO y� Q v � ° 0 C U o o ny aago N LLL ^d ise3 . 1Av� gM e v A • ..1'v epue^n!i� 19 /o+�a0 — ,1tH` nN laisat.poa / ,1 JIM!! \ AY !JIM \\...,..791 • . _ _� _ __ AV uaneH I Q WJ AV BSOa1.l +-- ..- , Ay PIel43Jd ' uewllaH ,----- -�AV UeW18H Ab wg.cau!A ue!►aLuea t r _� t 111111;11!il r• _ • r Ad anOJJ II # ..� i� L_ . • —•• �•' J �/ Z 3 g ;a Ij1IIIII If' CC 11-1 = cn 11.1111;11 II TJ 11111,111 ,1 tis il—■-k:'‘ 002 10 A P48 STAFF REPORT tat ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP L'I! J RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager By: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A SIDE LETTER AMENDING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending that the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District approve a resolution amending the language in the Memorandum of Understanding with the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Management Employees Group. BACKGROUND The Board of Directors previously approved Resolution 14-003 adopting the Fire Management Employees Group Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)effective July 1, 2014, pertaining to salary, benefits and other terms of employment. The MOU runs through June 30, 2017. The Fire Management Employees Group (MEG) has a reopener in the current MOU for consideration of a further adjustment to the salary range of the Fire Chief. The City and the Fire Management Employee Group met and conferred in good faith and agreed to: add language to the current MOU to make it clear that the Fire Chief is covered under the Fire MEG MOU; correct an oversight regarding step increase eligibility previously agreed to in the District's Personnel Rules; add an additional step to the Fire Chiefs salary range effective the first full pay period in July 2015, consistent with the Deputy Fire Chiefs current range; provide for a 5%equity adjustment for the Fire Chiefs salary range effective the first full pay period in July 2016; and increase the employee paid employer portion of Ca1PERS from 5% to 8% for the Fire Chief position also effective the first full pay period in July 2016. Attachments Resolution Approving Side Letter Agreement Side Letter Agreement P49 RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DISTRICT AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP WHEREAS, Representatives of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("District": hereinafter) and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Management Employee Group "Fire MEG" have met and conferred pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (California Government Code §3500, et seq.) with regard to terms and conditions of employment; and WHEREAS, Representatives of the District and Fire MEG have agreed upon and presented to this City Council a Side Letter Agreement (see attached Side Letter Agreement) that amends the current Memorandum of Understanding effective July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017, related to reopener in the current MOU (Article II Section 1 C). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, hereby resolves, that said Side Letter Agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to sign said Side Letter Agreement on behalf of the District, and the Secretary to attest thereto. Resolution No. FD 15- — Page 1 of 2 P5O PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July 2015. L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the 15'h day of July 2015. Executed this 15'h day of July 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 15- — Page 2 of 2 P51 SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES BARGAINING GROUP The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District("District")and the Fire Management Employees Bargaining Group ("Fire MEG") have a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") that commenced on July 1,2014 and is set to end on June 30,2017. The Parties now wish to enter into this new Side Letter of Agreement to memorialize the following change agreed to by both sides. Additional wording would be added to the Fire MEG MOU in ARTICLE I RECOGNITION and ARTICLE II COMPENSATION, §2 Salary Plan and § 7 Retirement Plan as outlined below. New language in underlined and old language is crossed-through. ARTICLE I RECOGNITION A. Pursuant to the provisions of existing rules and regulations and applicable State law, District hereby acknowledges Fire MEG as the exclusive recognized employee organization for the representation unit, which includes all management employees of the District (excluding the Fire Chief), who are employed on a full-time basis. The classes represented include Fire Chief, Fire Deputy Chief, Fire Battalion Chief, and Fire Marshal. B. Fire MEG dees-net represents' the classification of Fire Chief. However, Fire Chief is an at-will position,not subject to Article IV or V of this MOU or the District's Personnel Rules. At-will positions may be terminated at any time with or without cause or notice at the will of the City Manager or Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District in its sole discretion and without any right to due process or appeal right. Furthermore,the Fire Chief is precluded from acting as a Fire MEG representative or being a member of the Fire MEG Board. . ° . . - - Fire District. ARTICLE II COMPENSATION § 2 Salary Plan A. Salary Ranges The base salary for Deputy Fire Chief shall consist of ranges having eight (8) steps, labeled A through H, with approximately five percent (5%) between each step. The base salary for Fire Chief, Battalion Chief and Fire Marshall shall consist of ranges having seven (7) steps, labeled A through G, with approximately five percent (5%) between each step. Effective the first full pay period in July 2015, the Fire Chief salary range shall consist of ranges having eight (8) steps, labeled A through H, with approximately five percent (5%) between each step. i - P52 0 Effective the first full pay period in Jul 2016, there will be a five percent (5/o P YP July p ) equity adjustment to each step in the Fire Chief salary range. Advancement between steps requires a satisfactory or higher annual performance evaluation; provided, however, that any individual who has been at E step for 365 days or more prior to July 1,2014, shall be eligible for advancement to the next step on July 1,2014,if their last annual evaluation meets the requirements of this section. However, no employee shall receive more than one step increase in a 12-month period unless granted for outstanding achievement pursuant to Section 2(G) below. Placement within the range shall be in accordance with the following: 1. Salary on Appointment New employees shall be compensated at Step "A" of the salary range to which their class is allocated. If unusual recruitment difficulties are encountered or a candidate is exceptionally well qualified, appointment at a higher step in the salary range may be authorized by the Fire Chief. 2. Merit Salary Adjustments Advancement within a salary range shall not be automatic, but shall be based upon job performance and granted only on the recommendation of the employee's supervisor and approval of the Fire Chief. Employees shall be considered for merit salary increases in accordance with the following: a. Employees who are placed at Step A upon original employment, reinstatement, or promotion are eligible for a merit salary review after six (6) months of service. Subsequent merit salary review dates shall fall upon the completion of twelve (12) month service intervals. b. Employees who are placed at Step B or above upon original employment, reinstatement, or promotion shall be eligible for a merit salary review after twelve (12) six (6) months of service. Subsequent review dates shall fall upon the completion of twelve (12) month service intervals from the first merit salary review. c. The granting of an official leave of absence of more than thirty (30) continuous calendar days,other than military leave, shall cause the employee's merit salary review date to be extended the number of calendar days the employee was on leave. d. If, in the supervisor's judgment, the employee's performance does not justify a salary increase on the review date,the employee shall be reevaluated before the expiration of six (6) months dating from the employee's review date. If the period of postponement exceeds three (3) months and the employee receives a salary increase, the employee shall be assigned a new review date based on the date the increase was granted. e. Authorized salary step increases shall become effective at the beginning of the pay period nearest the employee's review date. f. Should an employee's review date be overlooked, and upon discovery of the error, if the employee is recommended for a salary increase, the employee shall receive a supplemental payment compensating him or her for the additional salary the employee would have received had the increase been granted at the appropriate time. P53 g. The normal merit salary increase shall be one (1) step granted in accordance with the preceding. However, to reward outstanding achievement and performance, the Fire Chief may grant one (1) additional step increase not to exceed one (1) step in any six (6) month period. h. In order to address a situation wherein application of this section would result in the inequitable treatment of employees and upon the recommendation of the Fire Chief and approval of the Board, an employee may be placed at any step in the salary range for his or her class. 47 Retirement Plan A. Benefits: Safety Members District is enrolled in the State of California Public Employee's Retirement System. Except as described herein, all benefits provided District employees under the District's Plan are paid by the District. Present benefits for public safety employees include the following: 1. Employees hired prior to July 9, 2011: § 21362.2 3%at 50 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20042 1 Year Final Compensation District pays and reports 9%normal PERS member contributions by resolution. Beginning July 1, 2014, employees hired prior to July 9, 2011, will contribute toward the employer share of Ca1PERS in an amount equal to the annual increase from the FY 2013/14 base year in the first tier employer rate (if any) that has been rounded to the nearest full percentage point, not to exceed a cumulative total of 5% during the term of this MOU. For example,for FY 2014/15,the first tier employer rate will increase from 26.14%to 27.849%,which by this formula will require employees to contribute 2%of pay toward the employer share (28% - 26%= 2%). The District will adopt a resolution providing that all employee CaIPERS contributions to the employer share pursuant to this section shall be deducted on a pre-tax basis. Beginning the first full pay p eriod in July 2015, employees hired prior to July 1, 2011,shall pay three percentage points(3%)in addition to the two percentage points(2%)outlined above, for a total of five (5%)percentage points of the normal Ca1PERS employer contribution. Beginning the first full pay period in July 2016, employees in the Fire Chief position, hired prior to July 1, 2011, shall pay an additional three percentage points (3%) in addition to the five percentage points (5%) outlined above. for a total of five (8%) percentage points of the normal Ca1PERS employer contribution. 2. Employees hired on or after 7/9/11 and through 12/31/12, and Classic PERS members, as defined by PERS, who are hired on or after January 1 2013: P54 § 21363.3 3%@55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20037 3 Year Final Compensation District pays and reports 8% normal PERS member contributions; employee pays 1%of the member contribution by resolution. The District has adopted a resolution providing that all employee Ca1PERS contributions shall be deducted on a pre-tax basis per IRC 414(h)(2). In addition to the member contribution of 1% in accordance with the preceding paragraph, beginning July 1, 2014, employees hired on July 9, 2011 and through December 31, 2012, as well as Classic PERS members who are hired on or after January 1, 2013, will contribute toward the employer share of Ca1PERS in an amount equal to the annual increase from the FY 2013/14 base year in the first tier employer rate (if any) that has been rounded to the nearest full percentage point, minus 1%, not to exceed a total of 4%. For example, for FY 14/15, the first tier employer rate will increase from 26.14% to 27.849%, which by this formula will require employees to contribute an additional I% of pay toward the employer share ((28%-1%)- 26%=1%). The District will adopt a resolution providing that all employee Ca1PERS contributions to the employer share pursuant to this section shall be deducted on a pre-tax basis. Beginning the first full pay period in July 2015, employees hired on July 9, 2011 and through December 31, 2012, as well as Classic PERS members who are hired on or after January 1, 2013, shall pay four percentage points (4%) of.the normal CaIPERS employer contribution, in addition to the portion of the Member's contribution outlined above. Beginning the first full pay period in July 2016, employees in the Fire Chief position hired on July 9. 2011 and through December 31. 2012, as well as Classic PERS members who are hired as the Fire Chief position on or after January 1, 2013, shall pay seven percentage points (7%) of the normal Ca1PERS employer p contribution, in addition to the P ortion of the Member's contribution outlined above. 3. Employees who are New PERS Members, as defined by PERS, who are hired on or after January 1, 2013: Employees are classified as New Members of PERS when they meet the definition of a"new member" for purposes of retirement pension benefits pursuant to the Public Employees Pension Reform Act of 2013. Generally, this includes employees that were hired into a regular position on or after January 1, 2013 or former PERS members who have more than a six-month break in service. Ca1PERS ultimately determines who is a new member in compliance with the law. Employees who are classified as New Members shall be eligible for the 2.7%at 57 Formula, 3 year final compensation average. The employee contribution for new members shall be one-half the normal cost, as determined by Ca1PERS.As of the effective date of this MOU,the required employee contribution P55 for new members is 11.5%of reportable compensation. This amount will be adjusted periodically by Ca1PERS, and the District employee contribution adjusted accordingly per state statute. The District has adopted a resolution providing that all employee Ca1PERS contributions shall be deducted on a pre-tax basis per IRC 414(h)(2). 4. It is understood that all contributions paid by the employee as described in Parts 1 through 2 above shall be calculated based upon the pay rate (ie, full base salary of the employee), plus any additional special compensation, including any Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC), and as described above in Part 3 above, on the pensionable compensation as defined in the California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 ("PEPRA"). The District pays EPMC for the various "Tiers" as outlined above and reports the value of EPMC payments as special compensation. The parties agree that to the extent permitted by law,this is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(1)(F) as Value of Employer-Paid Member Contributions. The parties also agree that the District has no additional obligation or costs should Ca1PERS, the State or the IRS determine otherwise. The District adopted a resolution providing that all employee CaIPERS contributions shall be deducted on a pre-tax basis to the extent permitted by law or IRS regulation. All employee payments of the employer share are done pursuant to Government Code Section 20516(f) There shall be no sunset date to any provision in Article II Section 7 Retirement Plan. For The Rancho Cucamonga Fire For the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Management Protection District: Employees Bargaining Unit: John R. Gillison, Ch 1 Ro rts City Manager Fire Management Employees Bargaining Unit 7/'/ Date Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P56 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00005292 06/24/2015 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9,320.00 0.00 9,320.00 AP 00005293 06/24/2015 RCCEA 1,334.00 0.00 1,334.00 AP 00005294 06/24/2015 RCPFA 10,449.56 0.00 10,449.56 AP 00005295 06/24/2015 TENASKA POWER SERVICES CO 4,588.30 0.00 4,588.30 AP 00005296 06/24/2015 VIASYN INC 7,717.70 0.00 7,717.70 Al' 00005297 06/25/2015 AHUMADA,ALEXANDER R 0.00 904.08 904.08 AP 00005298 06/25/2015 ALMAND,LLOYD 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005299 06/25/2015 BANTAU,VICTORIA 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005300 06/25/2015 BAZAL,SUSAN 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 AP 00005301 06/25/2015 BERRY.DAVID 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005302 06/25/2015 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005303 06/25/2015 CAMPBELL,GERALD 0.00 1,233.07 1.233.07 AP 00005304 06/25/2015 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005305 06/25/2015 CLABBY,RICHARD 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005306 06/25/2015 CORCORAN.ROBERT 0.00 525.11 525.11 AP 00005307 06/25/2015 COX,KARL 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005308 06/25/2015 CRANE,RALPH 0.00 1,323.48 1.323.48 AP 00005309 06/25/2015 CROSSLAND,WILBUR 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005310 06/25/2015 DAGUE,JAMES 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005311 06/25/2015 DE ANTONIO,SUSAN 0.00 525.11 525.11 AP 00005312 06/25/2015 DOMINICK,SAMUEL A. 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005313 06/25/2015 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005314 06/25/2015 FR1TCHEY,JOHN D. 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005315 06/25/2015 HEYDE,DONALD 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AI' 00005316 06/25/2015 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 1,172.22 1.172.22 AP 00005317 06/25/2015 KILMER,STEPHEN 0.00 1,233.07 1233.07 Al' 00005318 06/25/2015 LANE,WILLIAM 0.00 1,560.49 1.560.49 AP 00005319 06/25/2015 LEE.ALLAN J. 0.00 1,423.44 1.423.44 AP 00005320 06/25/2015 LENZE,PAUL E 0.00 1,224.46 1,224.46 AP 00005321 06/25/2015 LONGO,JOE 0.00 173.51 173.51 AP 00005322 06/25/2015 LUTTRULL.DARRELL 0.00 694.69 694.69 AP 00005323 06/25/2015 MACKALL,BENJAMIN 0.00 173.51 173.51 AP 00005324 06/25/2015 MAYFIELD.RON 0.00 1.323.48 1,323.48 AP 00005325 06/25/2015 MCKEE,JOHN 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005326 06/25/2015 MCMILLEN, LINDA 0.00 246.76 246.76 AP 00005327 06/25/2015 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005328 06/25/2015 MICHAEL,L. DENNIS 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005329 06/25/2015 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 3,384.57 3,384.57 AP 00005330 06/25/2015 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005331 06/25/2015 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005332 06/25/2015 NEE,RON 0.00 1,757.12 1,757.12 AP 00005333 06/25/2015 NELSON,MARY JANE 0.00 173.51 173.51 AP 00005334 06/25/2015 PLOUNG,MICHAEL 1 0.00 556.94 556.94 AP 00005335 06/25/2015 POST,MICHAEL R 0.00 1,577.31 1,577.31 AP 00005336 06/25/2015 PROULX,PATRICK 0.00 1,560.49 1,560.49 AP 00005337 06/25/2015 ROEDER,JEFF 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005338 06/25/2015 SALISBURY,THOMAS 0.00 893.87 893.87 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: I Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P57 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00005339 0625/2015 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005340 06/25/2015 SPAGNOLO,SAM 0.00 469.02 469.02 A' 00005341 06/25/2015 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 694.69 694.69 AP 00005342 06/25/2015 SULLIVAN,JAMES 0.00 753.31 753.31 AP 00005343 06/25/2015 TAYLOR,STEVE 0.00 1,224.46 1,224.46 AP 00005344 06/25/2015 TULEY,TERRY 0.00 1.172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005345 06/25/2015 VANDERKALLEN. FRANCIS 0.00 1,192.64 1,192.64 AP 00005346 06/25/2015 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,233.07 1,233.07 AP 00005347 06/25/2015 WOLFS,JACKIE 0.00 600.74 600.74 AP 00005348 06/25/2015 YOWELL,TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 AP 00359392 06/24/2015 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 342.99 0.00 342.99 AP 00359393 06/24/2015 ABDELKHALEQ,AIIMAD 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00359394 06/24/2015 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 13,026.16 0.00 13,026.16 AP 00359395 06/24/2015 ACTION AWARDS INC. 3,072.14 0.00 3,072.14 AP 00359396 06/24/2015 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW 35.00 0.00 35.00 AP 00359397 06/24/2015 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 AP 00359398 06/24/2015 ALL CITIES TOOLS 0.00 1,641.60 1,641.60 AP 00359399 06/24/2015 ALE.,WELDING 2.790.00 0.00 2.790.00 AP 00359400 06/24/2015 ALLBEE, KAREN A 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00359401 06/24/2015 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 214.00 0.00 21400 AP 00359402 06/24/2015 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES LLC 2,521.40 0.00 2,521.40 AP 00359403 06/24/2015 ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS 0.00 224.55 224.55 AP 00359404 06/24/2015 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 11,320.13 11,320.13 AP 00359405 06/24/2015 ALPHAGRAPHICS 420.86 0.00 420.86 AP 00359406 06/24/2015 ALTA LAGUNA MOBILE HOME PARK 1,100.00 0.00 1,100.00 AP 00359407 06/24/2015 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00359408 06/24/2015 AMERICAN SAFETY&HEALTH PROMOTION LTD. 0.00 498.00 498.00 AP 00359409 06/24/2015 AMERICAN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC 1.396.91 0.00 1,396.91 AP 00359410 06/24/2015 AMTECII ELEVATOR SERVICES 1,297.32 0.00 1.297.32 AP 00359411 06/24/2015 ARCHII3ALD PICT HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00359412 06/24/2015 ARCIIIT'ERRA DESIGN GROUP 6,948.66 0.00 6,948.66 AP 00359413 06/24/2015 AROCHO,ALMA 913.00 0.00 913.00 AP 00359414 06/24/2015 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 701.24 0.00 701.24 AP 00359415 06/24/2015 ART OF LIVING FOUNDATION 48.00 0.00 48.00 AP 00359416 06/24/2015 ARTISTIC RESOURCES CORPORATION 4,101.00 0.00 4,101.00 AP 00359417 06/24/2015 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 14.38 0.00 14.38 AP 00359418 06/24/2015 AVANTS,MARGE 195.00 0.00 195.00 AP 00359419 06/24/2015 13ABCOCK LABORATORIES INC 565.00 0.00 565.00 AP 00359420 06/24/2015 BALDY FIRE AND SAFETY 205.00 0.00 205.00 AP 00359421 06/24/2015 BARBARA'S ANSWERING SERVICE 589.16 0.00 589.16 AP 00359422 06/24/2015 BARNES AND NOBLE 973.75 0.00 973.75 AP 00359423 06/24/2015 BARRON,CAITLIN 82.08 0.00 82.08 AP 00359424 06/24/2015 BATTERY POWER INC 2,920.20 0.00 2,920.20 AP 00359425 06/24/2015 BCT ENTERTAINMENT 32,042.28 0.00 32,042.28 AP 00359426 06/24/2015 BERN MARIES PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 990.48 0.00 990.48 AP 00359427 06/24/2015 BIDOCIIKA,CHRIS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00359428 06/24/2015 BISHOP COMPANY 545.27 0.00 545.27 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P58 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Cheek No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359429 06/24/2015 13URGAN,MARY 32.39 0.00 32.39 AP 00359430 06/24/2015 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 10,434.60 0.00 10.434.60 AP 00359431 06/24/2015 CABLE INC. 1,715.70 0.00 1,715.70 AP 00359432 06/24/2015 CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 3,763.50 0.00 3,763.50 AP 00359433 06/24/2015 CALIFORNIA COOKOUT 2,043.75 0.00 2.043.75 AP 00359434 06/24/2015 CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC. 0.00 250.00 250.00 AP 00359435 06/24/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00359436 06/24/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00359437 06/24/2015 CALPERS 130,107.31 7,167.44 137,274.75 "" AP 00359438 06/24/2015 CALVERT,JASON 28.07 0.00 28.07 AP 00359439 06/24/2015 CAMBRIDGE COLLEGE 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00359440 06/24/2015 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 4,204.99 79.35 4.284.34 """ AP 00359441 06/24/2015 CASA VOLAN'I'E MOBILE HOME PARK 1,300.00 0.00 1.300,00 AP 00359442 06/24/2015 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 3.082.75 0.00 3,082.75 AP 00359443. 06/24/2015 CELL ENERGY 30.00 0.00 30.00 AP 00359444 06/24/2015 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00359445 06/24/2015 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 14.88 0,00 14.88 AP 00359446 06/24/2015 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 641.47 0,00 641.47 AP 00359447 06/24/2015 CINTAS CORP.4150 2,217.43 0.00 2,217.43 AP 00359448 06/24/2015 CIRIACKS, VALERIE ANN 135.00 0.00 135.00 AP 00359449 06/24/2015 CITY RENTALS 376.49 0.00 376.49 AP 00359450 06/24/2015 CIVICA SOFTWARE INC. 1,350.00 0.00 1,350.00 AP 00359451 06/24/2015 CLAREMONT I UGH SCHOOL 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00359452 06/24/2015 CLARK,KAREN 684.00 0.00 684.00 AP 00359453 06/24/2015 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 138.68 0.00 138.68 AP 00359454 06/24/2015 CLARY CORPORATION 1,352.55 0.00 1,352.55 AP 00359455 06/24/2015 CLEAR COAST RISTORATI ON 0.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 AP 00359456 06/24/2015 COAST RECREATION INC 1,581.81 0.00 1,581.81 AP 00359457 06/24/2015 Corr SERVICES INC. 810.00 0.00 810.00 AP 00359458 06/24/2015 CONFIRE IPA 0.00 49,102.99 49.102.99 AP 00359459 06/24/2015 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 876.96 0.00 876.96 AP 00359460 06/24/2015 COOKSEY,ANNA 19.80 0.00 19.80 AP 00359461 06/24/2015 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 892.33 0.00 892.33 AP 00359462 06/24/2015 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 10,004.31 0.00 10,004.31 AP 00359463 06/24/2015 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 864.00 0.00 864.00 AP 00359464 06/24/2015 DCI'8TII AND VINEYARD LLC 2,779.00 0.00 2,779.00 AP 00359465 06/24/2015 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION 0.00 384.00 384.00 AP 00359466 06/24/2015 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 258.62 0.00 258.62 AP 00359467 06/24/2015 DIVERSIFIED INSPEC'T'IONS 0.00 1,362.25 1,362.25 AP 00359468 06/24/2015 DLIMAGING 239.44 0.00 239.44 AP 00359469 06/24/2015 DOLLARHIDE,GINGER 168.00 0.00 168.00 AP 00359470 06/24/2015 DOWNEY,JENNIFER 13.32 0.00 13.32 AP 00359471 06/24/2015 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,THE 0.00 150.00 150.00 AP 00359472 06/24/2015 DUNN, ANN MARIE 762.00 0.00 762.00 AP 00359473 06/24/2015 EASTERL,ING, RAY 211.20 0.00 211.20 AP 00359474 06/24/2015 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 700.38 26.00 726.38 """ AP 00359475 06/24/2015 ELLAS,'TRIO 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P59 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359476 06/24/2015 EMC RESEARCH 17,000.00 0.00 17,000.00 AP 00359477 06/24/2015 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC. 3,212.13 0.00 3,212.13 AP 00359478 06/24/2015 ESKENAZI,MOISES 237.50 0.00 237.50 AP 00359479 06/24/2015 FAILSAFE TESTING 0.00 3,084.20 3,084.20 AP 00359480 06/24/2015 FAZEL,ZIA 290.93 0.00 290,93 AP 00359481 06/24/2015 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 28.00 0.00 28.00 AP 00359482 06/24/2015 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 153.32 153.32 AP 00359483 06/24/2015 FLINT TRADING INC 1,813.62 0.00 1,813.62 AP 00359484 06/24/2015 FOOTHILL MOBILE MANOR 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00359485 06/24/2015 FREGOSO,VIVIAN 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00359486 06/24/2015 FRIENDS OF THE BUENA PARK YOUTH THEATRE 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00359487 06/24/2015 FULLER,REBECCA 45.11 0.00 45.11 AP 00359488 06/24/2015 GAIL MATERIALS 1,838.96 0.00 1,838.96 AP 00359489 06/24/2015 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY AND CREMATORY 550.00 0.00 550.00 AP 00359490 06/24/2015 GIORDANO.MARIANNA 38.40 0.00 38.40 AP 00359491 06/24/2015 GOODFIELD, RICHARD 48.00 0.00 48.00 AP 00359492 06/24/2015 GOODYEAR TIRE&RUBBER COMPANY 5,039.18 0.00 5,039.18 AP 00359493 06/24/2015 GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 2,304.55 0.00 2,304.55 *** AP 00359494 06/24/2015 GRAINGER 5,370.68 497.11 5,867.79*** AP 00359495 06/24/2015 GRAVES&KING LLP 693.75 0.00 693.75 AP 00359496 06/24/2015 GRAYBAR 260.50 0.00 260.50 AP 00359497 06/24/2015 GROSH SCENIC RENTALS INC 86.40 0.00 86.40 AP 00359498 06/24/2015 HACKETT, RAMONA 258.00 0.00 258.00 AP 00359499 06/24/2015 HAMILTON,MONIQUE 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00359500 06/24/2015 HAMP'T'ON YOGA 948.00 0.00 948.00 AP 00359501 06/24/2015 HD PRODUCTIONS LLC 10,750.00 0.00 10,750.00 AP 00359502 06/24/2015 HENRY SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 126.48 0.00 126.48 AP 00359503 06/24/2015 HI WAY SAFETY INC 2,290.21 0.00 2,290.21 AP 00359504 06/24/2015 HILL,KENNETH 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00359505 06/24/2015 (TILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 2,791.65 0.00 2,791.65 AP 00359506 06/24/2015 HOSE MAN INC 121.47 0.00 121.47 AP 00359507 06/24/2015 IIUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY [N' 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00359508 06/24/2015 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 4,672.15 0.00 4.672.15 AP 00359509 06/24/2015 HURTADO,JULIO 86.00 0.00 86.00 AP 00359511 06/24/2015 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 20,082.50 20,082.50 AP 00359512 06/24/2015 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 52.50 0.00 52.50 AP 00359513 06/24/2015 IPROMOTEU 0.00 2,025.44 2,025.44 AP 00359514 06/24/2015 ISMAIL,ROSA 112.00 0.00 112.00 AP 00359515 06/24/2015 IXCO,ALBERT 118.78 0.00 118.78 AP 00359516 06/24/2015 J AND S STRIPING CO INC 1,759.00 0.00 1,759.00 AP 00359517 06/24/2015 JACOBS ENGINEERING 43,522.83 0.00 43,522.83 AP 00359518 06/24/2015 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 3,294.16 0.00 3,294.16 AP 00359519 06/24/2015 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 3.539.40 0.00 3,539.40 AP 00359520 06/24/2015 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 13,051.84 0.00 13,051.84 AP 00359521 06/24/2015 JRC HOUSING 1,285.00 0.00 1,285.00 AP 00359522 06/24/2015 JULIUS,MICHAEL 99.00 0.00 99.00 AP 00359523 06/24/2015 KASA CONSTRUCTION INC 102,868.45 0.00 102,868.45 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P60 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359524 06/24/2015 KONE INC 1,267.22 0.00 1,267.22 AP 00359525 06/24/2015 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 108.15 0.00 108.15 AP 00359526 06/24/2015 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 0.00 1,057.01 1,057.01 AP 00359527 06/24/2015 LAYNE,TAMARA 54.25 0.00 54.25 AP 00359528 06/24/2015 LEAPING LIZARDS MUSIC 1,254.00 0.00 1,254.00 AP 00359529 06/24/2015 LEON,LYDIA 79.00 0.00 79.00 AP 00359530 06/24/2015 LEW EDWARDS GROUP,THE 6,345.98 0.00 6,345.98 AP 00359531 06/24/2015 LOPEZ,ANGEL 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00359532 06/24/2015 LUGO,HEATHER 737.75 0.00 737.75 AP 00359533 06/24/2015 MANKE,ART 1,533.00 0.00 1,533.00 AP 00359534 06/24/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 73,116.47 6,340.81 79,457.28*** AP 00359535 06/24/2015 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 0.00 1,709.93 1.709.93 AP 00359536 06/24/2015 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00359537 06/24/2015 MASON,MIKE 473.37 0.00 473.37 AP 00359538 06/24/2015 MATERIAL SALES UNLIMITED 1,003.20 0.00 1.003.20 AP 00359539 06/24/2015 MC TRUCKING 1.325.21 0.00 1,325.21 AP 00359540 06/24/2015 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 3,855.99 0.00 3,855.99 AP 00359541 06/24/2015 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 720.00 0.00 720.00 AP 00359542 06/24/2015 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 204.29 0.00 204.29 AP 00359543 06/24/2015 MENDEZ,JOB 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00359544 06/24/2015 MIDWEST TAPE 855.98 0.00 855.98 AP 00359545 0624/2015 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 3.00 0.00 3.00 Al' 00359546 06/24/2015 MORRIS, DOUG 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00359547 06/24/2015 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00359548 06/24/2015 MURADIAN,LESLIE 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00359549 06/24/2015 MUSICSTAR 2,322.00 0.00 2.322.00 AP 00359550 06/24/2015 NEXTEL 0.00 164.97 164.97 AP 00359551 06/24/2015 NINYO& MOORE 15,015.50 0.00 15,015.50 AP 00359552 06/24/2015 NORMAN,CHRIS 86.00 0.00 86.00 AP 00359553 06/24/2015 NOTEWORTHY PUPPETS 874.00 0.00 874.00 AP 00359554 06/24/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 2,873.56 763.32 3,636.88*** AP 00359555 06/24/2015 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 477.27 61.13 538.40*"* AP 00359556 06/24/2015 ORONA, PATRICIA 1,680.00 0.00 1,680.00 AP 00359557 06/24/2015 017,LAURA 736.00 0.00 736.00 AP 00359558 06/24/2015 OTT,SHARON 590.00 0.00 590.00 AP 00359559 06/24/2015 PACIFIC ADVANCED CIVIL ENGINEERING 3,800.00 0.00 3.800.00 AP 00359560 06/24/2015 PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00359561 06/24/2015 PAPAZOGLU,NORAY 588.00 0.00 588.00 AP 00359562 06/24/2015 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00359563 06/24/2015 PATCHETT&ASSOCIATES 1,596.15 0.00 1,596.15 AP 00359564 06/24/2015 PEP BOYS 121.72 0.00 121.72 AP 00359565 06/24/2015 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK,THE 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00359566 06/24/2015 PIT'ASSI ARCHITECTS INC 51,827.50 0.00 51.827.50 AP 00359567 06/24/2015 PORAC 130.00 0.00 130.00 AP 00359568 06/24/2015 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 175.50 0.00 175.50 AP 00359569 06/24/2015 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 84.24 0.00 84.24 Al' 00359570 06/24/2015 PRESCOTT,MARTIN 1,055.59 0.00 1,055.59 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P61 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359571 06/24/2015 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 620.95 0.00 620.95 AP 00359572 06/24/2015 PRO SALES GROUP INC 20,892.26 0.00 20,892.26 AP 00359575 06/24/2015 PROVO ENGINEERING 25.064.00 0.00 25,064.00 AP 00359576 06/24/2015 PUBLIC SURPLUS 912.87 0.00 912.87 AP 00359577 06/24/2015 RAINEY,LATREACE 495.00 0.00 495.00 AP 00359578 06/24/2015 RAMONA VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00359579 06/24/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 9,227.40 0.00 9,227.40 AP 00359580 06/24/2015 RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICES INC 320.00 0.00 320.00 AP 00359581 06/24/2015 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 3.78 0.00 3.78 AP 00359582 06/24/2015 RC COMMUNITY&ARTS FOUNDATION 3.670.00 0.00 3,670.00 AP 00359583 06/24/2015 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSFION 0.00 980.00 980.00 AP 00359584 06/24/2015 RIGELMAN, ENCARNACION ONTIVEROS 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00359585 06/24/2015 RILES,JEANETIE 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00359586 06/24/2015 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 272.00 0.00 272.00 AP 00359587 06/24/2015 ROGERS ANDERSON MALODY&SCOTT LLP 9.310.00 0.00 9,310.00 AP 00359588 06/24/2015 ROTO ROOTER 4.999.98 0.00 4,999.98 AP 00359589 06/24/2015 RSSA HOME 0.00 7,720.92 7,720.92 AP 00359590 06/24/2015 RUBENS AUTO COLLISION CENTER 4,259.18 0.00 4259.18 AP 00359591 06/24/2015 S&SON'S ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS CORP 89.003,60 0.00 89,003.60 AP 00359592 06/24/2015 SAFE-ENTRY'TECHNICAL INC 0.00 250.00 250.00 AP 00359593 06/24/2015 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 149.04 0.00 149.04 AP 00359594 06/24/2015 SAFT,BRANDON 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00359595 06/24/2015 SAMS CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANK 336.06 0.00 336.06 AP 00359596 06/24/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 967.16 0.00 967.16 AP 00359597 06/24/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 16,037.46 0.00 16,037.46 AP 00359598 06/24/2015 SBPEA 1.086.80 0.00 1,086.80 AP 00359599 06/24/2015 SC FUELS 24,682.17 0.00 24,682.17 AP 00359600 06/24/2015 SCHULTE.JODY 26.20 0.00 26.20 AP 00359601 06/24/2015 SDC LEAGUE HEALTH FUND 675.00 0.00 675.00 AP 00359602 06/24/2015 SDC LEAGUE PENSION FUND 368.00 0.00 368.00 AP 00359603 06/24/2015 SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS 915.00 0,00 915.00 AP 00359604 06/24/2015 SENECI'IAL,CALVIN 645.00 0.00 645.00 AP 00359605 06/24/2015 SEXTON,SHEILA 6.00 0.00 6.00 AP 00359606 06/24/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00359607 06/24/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 93.38 0,00 93.38 AP 00359608 06/24/2015 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 181,632.28 0.00 181,632.28 AP 00359609 06/24/2015 SIGN SHOP,THE 648.00 0.00 648.00 AP 00359610 06/24/2015 SILVER, EDNA 720.00 0.00 720.00 AP 00359611 06/24/2015 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 199.00 0.00 199.00 AP 00359612 06/24/2015 SNAP ON INDUSTRIAL 0.00 35,737.29 35,737.29 AP 00359613 06/24/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 92.72 298.84 39156*** AP 00359614 06/24/2015 SOURCE GRAPHICS 107.52 0.00 107.52 AP 00359618 06/24/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,474.90 718.48 13,193.38*** AP 00359619 06/24/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 190,624.37 0.00 190,624.37 AP 00359620 06/24/2015 SPARKLETTS 76.00 0.00 76.00 AP 00359621 06/24/2015 STREAMLINE PRESS INC 147.96 0.00 147.96 AP 00359622 06/24/2015 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 900.00 0.00 900.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P62 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359623 06/24/2015 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 65.00 65.00 AP 00359624 06/24/2015 THEATRE @ BOSTON COURT,THE 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00359625 06/24/2015 THEATRE COMPANY,THE 545.00 0.00 545.00 AP 00359626 06/24/2015 THOMSON REU'T'ERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER 415.34 0.00 415.34 AP 00359627 06/24/2015 'us FLOOR COVERING SUPPLIES INC 110.16 0.00 110.16 AP 00359628 06/24/2015 'IRACEY,VAL 336.00 0.00 336.00 AP 00359629 06/24/2015 U S BANK N.A. 49.70 0.00 49.70 AP 00359630 06/24/2015 ULINE 722.31 0.00 722.31 AP 00359631 06/24/2015 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 354.00 0.00 354.00 AP 00359632 06/24/2015 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 38.475.00 0.00 38.475.00 AP 00359633 06/24/2015 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 3.141.04 0.00 3,141.04 AP 00359634 06/24/2015 UNITED WAY 159.00 0.00 159.00 AP 00359635 06/24/2015 UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORD ru CSUSB.THE 7,000.00 0.00 7,000.00 AP 00359636 06/24/2015 UPLAND CHRISTIAN ACADEMY 132.53 0.00 132.53 AP 00359637 06/24/2015 UPS 100.22 0.00 100.22 AP 00359638 06/24/2015 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 96.305.84 0.00 96,305.84 AP 00359639 06/24/2015 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,960.12 0.00 4,960.12 AP 00359640 06/24/2015 VECCI IIO,TOM 202.00 0.00 202.00 AP 00359644 06/24/2015 VERIZON WIREE..ESS- LA 4,745.02 0.00 4,745.02 AP 00359645 06/24/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 4,110.00 0.00 4,110.00 AP 00359646 06/24/2015 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 5,781.73 0.00 5,781.73 AP 00359647 06/24/2015 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00359648 06/24/2015 VICTORIA GARDENS 10,175.00 0.00 10,175.00 AP 00359649 06/24/2015 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10.842.42 0.00 10,842.42 AP 00359650 06/24/2015 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 524.95 265.00 789.95*** AP 00359651 06/24/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 7.233.59 508.20 7,741.79*** AP 00359652 06/24/2015 WEI3BER,DEBORAH 39.97 0.00 39.97 AP 00359653 06/24/2015 WEST COAST CONCERT LIGII'TING 100.00 0.00 100.00 Al' 00359654 06/24/2015 WEST COAST SIDING&'PRIM 603.39 0.00 603.39 AP 00359655 06/24/2015 WESTERN STA'T'ES FIRE EQUIPMENT 0.00 8,594.00 8,594.00 AP 00359656 06/24/2015 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00359657 06/24/2015 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 1,609.17 0.00 1,609.17 AP 00359658 06/24/2015 WILSON AND BELL 554.17 0.00 554.17 AP 00359659 06/24/2015 WONG, DAVID 69.50 0.00 69.50 AP 00359660 06/25/2015 BELL,MICIIAEL 1.. 0.00 1.560.49 1,560.49 AP 00359661 06/25/2015 LONCAR,PHILIP 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00359662 06/25/2015 'I'OWNSEND,JAMES 0.00 1,560.49 1,560.49 AP 00359663 06/25/2015 WALKER, KENNI°11 0.00 246.76 246.76 AP 00359666 06/25/2015 I3RODART BOOKS 4,119.85 0.00 4,119.85 AP 00359669 06/25/2015 C V W D 50,767.25 1,063.41 51,830.66*** AP 00359670 06/25/2015 PENNY PLUMBING 4,525.00 0.00 4,525.00 AP 00359671 06/25/2015 SUNRISE FORD 152.56 0.00 152.56 AP 00359672 06/25/2015 TOMARK SPORTS INC 378.00 0.00 378.00 AP 00359673 06/25/2015 VISTA PAINT 6,049.80 0.00 6,049.80 AP 00359674 07/01/2015 A AND R TIRE SERVICE. 901.84 0.00 901.84 AP 00359675 07/01/2015 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00359676 07/01/2015 ADVANCED ALTERNATOR EXCHANGE 178.20 0.00 178.20 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait t Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P63 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359677 07/01/2015 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 1,154.00 0.00 1,154.00 AP 00359678 07/01/2015 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 4,212.10 0.00 4,212.10 AP 00359679 07/01/2015 ALL SURFACE ROOFING&WATERPROOFING INC 10,961.00 0.00 10,961.00 AP 00359680 07/01/2015 ALL WELDING 3,499.20 0.00 3,499.20 AP 00359681 07/01/2015 ALMA/2AR,AIINED MOHAMED JUMAA 19.25 0.00 19.25 Al' 00359682 07/01/2015 ALPHAGRAPHICS 30.78 0.00 30.78 AP 00359683 07/01/2015 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 725.00 0.00 725.00 AP 00359684 07/01/2015 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 281.07 0.00 281.07 AP 00359685 07/01/2015 ARANA,JONATHON 1.399.50 0.00 1,399.50 AP 00359686 07/01/2015 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 307.75 0.00 307.75 AP 00359687 07/01/2015 ASSI SECURITY 8,353.00 0.00 8.353.00 AP 00359688 07/01/2015 AUFI3AU CORPORATION 20.560.00 0.00 20.560.00 AP 00359689 07/01/2015 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 68.98 0.00 68.98 AP 00359690 07/01/2015 BATTERY POWER INC 1,196.16 0.00 1,196.16 AP 00359691 07/01/2015 BEI:TRAN,OSBALDO ALVARADO 864.00 0.00 864.00 AP 00359692 07/01/2015 BUFFALO WINGS AND RINGS 3.652.19 0.00 3,652.19 AP 00359693 07/01/2015 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 248.21 0.00 248.21 AP 00359694 07/01/2015 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 46.20 0.00 46.20 AP 00359695 07/01/2015 CD PROPERTY SERVICES 805.00 0.00 805.00 AP 00359696 07/01/2015 CDW-G 598.32 0.00 598.32 AP 00359697 07/01/2015 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 81.00 0.00 81.00 AP 00359698 07/01/2015 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 262.44 524.88 787.32 *** AP 00359699 07/01/2015 CINTAS CORP.#150 956.46 0.00 956.46 AP 00359700 07/01/2015 CLEAR COAST RESTORATION 11,081.29 0.00 11,081.29 AP 00359701 07/01/2015 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 1,595.00 0.00 1,595.00 AP 00359702 07/01/2015 C V W D 33.26 0.00 33.26 AP 00359703 07/01/2015 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 2.006.64 0.00 2,006.64 AP 00359704 07/01/2015 DATA ARC LLC 2,994.99 0.00 2,994.99 AP 00359705 07/01/2015 DE B1ASE,GENE 2,800.00 0.00 2,800.00 AP 00359706 07/01/2015 DEMPSTER, KERI 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00359707 07/01/2015 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,'HIE 0.00 450.00 450.00 AP 00359708 07/01/2015 DURATECH USA INC. 2.686.23 0.00 2,686.23 AP 00359709 07/01/2015 EARTHWORKS SOIL AMENDMENTS INC. 3,191.94 0.00 3,191.94 AP 00359710 07/01/2015 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 817.05 0.00 817.05 AP 00359711 07/01/2015 EMBROIDME 403.55 0.00 403.55 AP 00359712 07/01/2015 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00359713 07/01/2015 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 76.15 0.00 76.15 AP 00359714 07/01/2015 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 16.73 0.00 16.73 AP 00359715 07/01/2015 FELICIANO,ANTHONY 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00359716 07/01/2015 FEI2NANDEZ, HANNAH 52.10 0.00 52.10 AP 00359717 07/01/2015 FIRST CLASS HEATING&AIR 5,500.00 0.00 5,500.00 AP 00359718 07/01/2015 FIRST CLASS HEATING&AIR 5,500.00 0.00 5,500.00 AP 00359719 07/01/2015 FIRST CLASS HEATING&AIR 5,500.00 0.00 5.500.00 AP 00359720 07/01/2015 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 529.20 0.00 529.20 AP 00359721 07/01/2015 FLEET SERVICES INC. 181.39 0.00 181.39 AP 00359722 07/01/2015 ERASURE,MICHAEL 30.18 0.00 30.18 AP 00359723 07/01/2015 FUSION SIGN AND DESIGN 1,847.88 0.00 1,847.88 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P64 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359724 07/01/2015 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 35.52 0.00 35.52 AP 00359725 07/01/2015 GEOGRAPHICS 1,168.56 0.00 1,168.56 AP 00359726 07/01/2015 GOOD YEAR SOCCER LEAGUE 464.00 0.00 464.00 AP 00359727 07/01/2015 GRAINGER 9,889.07 216.90 10.105.97 "' AP 00359728 07/01/2015 GRAYBAR 60.36 0.00 60.36 AP 00359729 07/01/2015 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 1,047.00 0.00 1.047.00 AP 00359730 07/01/2015 GULF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPANY 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00359731 07/01/2015 HEARTSAVERS LLC 120.00 0.00 120.00 AP 00359732 07/01/2015 HEILIG,KELLY 363.00 0.00 363.00 AP 00359733 07/01/2015 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSOCIATES 15,248.33 0.00 15,248.33 AP 00359734 07/01/2015 HOLLIS,PRIMALYN 17.55 0.00 17.55 AP 00359735 07/01/2015 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 395.31 0.00 395.31 AP 00359736 07/01/2015 HOSE MAN INC 66.47 0.00 66.47 AP 00359737 07/01/2015 IMS INC 84.15 0.00 84.15 AP 00359738 07/01/2015 INDERWIESCHE,MATT 1,875.00 0.00 1,875.00 AP 00359739 07/01/2015 INLAND PRESORT& MAILING SERVICES 164.53 0.00 164.53 AP 00359740 07/01/2015 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 15,797.18 0.00 15.797.18 AP 00359741 07/01/2015 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 796.85 0.00 796.85 AP 00359742 07/01/2015 J AND S STRIPING CO INC 2,697.00 0.00 2.697.00 AP 00359743 07/01/2015 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 23.52 0.00 23.52 AP 00359744 07/01/2015 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 3.984.00 0.00 3.984.00 AP 00359745 07/01/2015 JRC HOUSING 8.477.00 0.00 8,477.00 AP 00359746 07/01/2015 JRC HOUSING 5.995.00 0.00 5,995.00 AP 00359747 07/01/2015 JRC HOUSING 4,895.00 0.00 4,895.00 AP 00359748 07/01/2015 K K WOODWORKING 107.90 0.00 107.90 AP 00359749 07/01/2015 KATAHDIN ENVIRONMENTAL 1,400.00 0.00 1.400.00 AP 00359750 07/01/2015 KENT HARRIS TRUCKING& MATERIALS 332.80 0.00 332.80 AP 00359751 07/01/2015 KRONOS INC 0.00 1,505.00 1,505.00 AP 00359752 07/01/2015 LEAL.RUTH 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00359753 07/01/2015 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 9,455.75 0.00 9,455.75 AP 00359754 07/01/2015 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00359755 07/01/2015 MARCO EQUIPMENT CO 1,693.35 0.00 1.693.35 AP 00359756 07/01/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 12,439.83 0.00 12,439.83 AP 00359757 07/01/2015 MARK CI-IRISTOPI IER INC 856.50 0.00 856.50 AP 00359758 07/01/2015 MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 143.85 0.00 143.85 AP 00359759 07/01/2015 MCMASI'ER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 484.59 0.00 484.59 AP 00359760 07/01/2015 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 98.02 0.00 98.02 . AP 00359761 07/01/2015 MIDWEST"TAPE 2,556.74 0.00 2,556.74 AP 00359762 07/01/2015 MORALES,MELISSA 149.00 0.00 149.00 AP 00359763 07/01/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 453.00 0.00 453.00 AP 00359764 07/01/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 798.41 0.00 798.41 AP 00359765 07/01/2015 MUSICSTAR 2,631.60 0.00 2,631.60 AP 00359766 07/01/2015 NAPA AUTO PARTS 6.63 0.00 6.63 AP 00359767 07/01/2015 NIGHTHAWK TOTAL CONTROL 44.58 0.00 44.58 AP 00359768 07/01/2015 NINYO&MOORE 11,789.00 0.00 11,789.00 AP 00359770 07/01/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 10,426.68 513.79 10,940.47"' AP 00359771 07/01/2015 ON'T'ARIO WINNELSON CO 10.80 0.00 10.80 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P65 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359772 07/01/2015 ONTRAC 39.49 0.00 39.49 AP 00359773 07/01/2015 PATTON SALES CORP 29.88 0.00 29.88 AP 00359774 07/01/2015 PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00359775 07/01/2015 PEPSI-COLA 666.00 0.00 666.00 AP 00359776 07/01/2015 POLCENE, PAIGE 189.00 0.00 189.00 AP 00359777 07/01/2015 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 172.76 172.76 AP 00359778 07/01/2015 PRO SALES GROUP INC 2.127.72 0.00 2,127.72 AP 00359779 07/01/2015 PROMOTIONS TEES& MORE 8.252.83 0.00 8,252.83 AP 00359780 07/01/2015 PSYCHOLOGICAL RESOURCES 0.00 1.600.00 1,600.00 Al' 00359781 07/01/2015 PW GILLIBRAND INC 1,601.68 0.00 1.601.68 AI' 00359782 07/01/2015 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 246.24 0.00 246.24 Al' 00359783 07/01/2015 RED CHAPEL 241.97 0.00 241.97 AI' 00359784 07/01/2015 REGENCY ENTERPRISES INC 6,265.08 0.00 6,265.08 AP 00359785 07/01/2015 RJ NOBLE COMI'ANY 600.877,26 0.00 600,877.26 Al' 00359786 07/01/2015 RIM DESIGN GROUP INC 37,628.06 0.00 37.628.06 AP 00359787 07/01/2015 ROBLES, RAUL P 105.00 0.00 105.00 AP 00359788 07/01/2015 S.CALIF. MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDERATION 460.00 0.00 460.00 AP 00359789 07/01/2015 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 250.00 250.00 Al' 00359790 07/01/2015 SC FUELS 0.00 5,281.78 5,281.78 AP 00359791 07/01/2015 SCMAF- INLAND VALLEYS 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00359792 07/01/2015 SCOTT,APRIL 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00359793 07/01/2015 SEALMASTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 420.01 0.00 420.01 AP 00359794 07/01/2015 SEYMOUR, RONALD 0.00 261.00 261.00 AP 00359795 07/01/2015 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 293.65 0.00 293,65 Al' 00359796 07/01/2015 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 164.80 0.00 164.80 AP 00359797 07/01/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 165.12 46.10 211.22 *** AP 00359805 07/01/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24,244.17 4,592.33 28,836.50*** AP 00359806 07/01/2015 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 529.00 0.00 529.00 Al' 00359807 07/01/2015 SOUT'HWEST'I'RAFFIC SYSTEMS INC 894.00 0.00 894.00 AP 00359808 07/01/2015 SPINDOLA,13EDA 596.85 0.00 596.85 AP 00359809 07/01/2015 STAPLETON.JOSHUA: 0.00 229.22 229.22 AI' 00359810 07/01/2015 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 118.43 0.00 118.43 AP 00359811 07/01/2015 SUN BADGE CO 0.00 1240.45 1,240.45 AP 00359812 07/01/2015 SUNGARI)PUBLIC SECTOR INC 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00359813 07/01/2015 SUPERMARKET ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES 4,719.36 0.00 4,719.36 AP 00359814 07/01/2015 SWIFI'Y SIGN 0.00 1,706.40 1,706.40 AP 00359815 07/01/2015 TARGETSOLUTIONS 0.00 3.85750 3.857.50 AP 00359816 07/01/2015 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 73.00 73.00 AP 00359817 07/01/2015 T'HOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 1.225.58 0.00 1,225.58 AP 00359818 07/01/2015 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 170.00 0.00 170.00 AP 00359819 07/01/2015 TORO TOWING 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00359820 07/01/2015 TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISORS ASSOC SOUTH 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00359821 07/01/2015 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 482.85 0.00 482.85 AP 00359822 07/01/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT 46746022500 15,045.73 0.00 15,045.73 AP 00359823 07/01/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1.005.13 0.00 1,005.13 Al' 00359824 07/01/2015 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 340.23 0.00 340.23 AP 00359825 07/01/2015 VEND U COMPANY 241.27 0.00 241.27 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait 4 Time: 15:25:50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P66 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/24/2015 through 7/7/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359826 07/01/2015 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 991.05 0.00 991.05 AP 00359827 07/01/2015 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 9,565.94 0.00 9.565.94 AP 00359829 07/01/2015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 5,091.13 1.936.17 7,027.30'.. AP 00359830 07/01/2015 VISION ACCOCIATES INC 910.61 0.00 910.61 AI' 00359831 07/01/2015 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 2,862.76 0.00 2,862.76 AP 00359832 07/01/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 9,572.71 0.00 9,572.71 AP 00359833 07/01/2015 WHITE CAP CONSTRUC'T'ION SUPPLY 291.57 0.00 291.57 Al' 00359834 07/01/2015 WILSON AND BELL 141.88 0.00 141,88 AP 00359835 07/01/2015 WINZER CORPORATION 349,03 0.00 349.03 AP 00359836 07/01/2015 XL STORAGE 895.00 0.00 895.00 AP 00359837 07/01/2015 LA PUMA,DEBORAH WICKS 1.500.00 0.00 1.500.00 AP 00359838 07/01/2015 MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL. 8,742.00 0.00 8.742.00 AP 00359839 07/01/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3.166.66 0.00 3,166.66 AP 00359840 07/01/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY EPOS 0.00 125.00 125.00 AP 00359841 07/01/2015 WHITSELL.JASON 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00359842 07/01/2015 ZPX INC 70.00 0.00 70.00 Al' 00359843 07/01/2015 ABC LOCKSMITHS 279.00 0.00 279.00 AP 00359844 07/01/2015 AIRGAS USA L.LC 894.40 0.00 894.40 AP 00359845 07/01/2015 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 564.30 0.00 564.30 AP 00359846 07/01/2015 CAI,SENSE 4.703.42 0.00 4,703.42 AP 00359847 07/01/2015 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 6548.27 65.00 6.613.27"' AP 00359849 07/01/2015 C V W D 50,151.21 0.00 50,151.21 AP 00359850 07/01/2015 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 282.78 0.00 282.78 Al' 00359851 07/01/2015 EMCOR SERVICE 1.122.31 0.00 1,122.31 Al' 00359852 07/01/2015 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 1,928.61 0.00 1.928.61 AP 00359853 07/01/2015 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 94.47 0.00 94.47 AP 00359854 07/01/2015 FASTENAL COMPANY 3,184.70 0.00 3,184.70 AP 00359855 07/01/2015 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 634.97 0.00 634.97 AP 00359856 07/01/2015 HOL.L.IDAY ROCK CO INC 17,378.64 0.00 17.378.64 AP 00359857 07/01/2015 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 1.505.24 0.00 1.50524 Total City: $2,675,881.87 Total Fire: $248,307.27 Grand Total: $2,924,189.14 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: I I Current Date: 07/08/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED -CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 15:25:50 P67 p) 22 i 0 0 o 00 o o p y Y d ``'3 N 0 O) N Q n 0 r a O I I O O r O r r • UJ E w .c E U - `m N C 0 O f > = n E 7, 'L c O wm` m 0 drc C f > O) 0 2 0 0 00) N N >"O CO a R co `` > N O ° (7 N r O C I G O O O r r • N U1 0 v O Wo r r >L E c D 0 oo 0 U a 'o c o 0) EA r N V7- O E E OD CO CD N H 0 qy r 0 0 o O1 o , E N 0 0 a O .c C d C O o O C r N NQ r n N h A T N .o - r r to'1 0l O 0 d 0 ✓ r N N C E > O1 c •'N a v C 0) w O 2 N m In in o u°) C Co N O o e O 6 - lV 0 )O N o Y d E c o o. I- A d N O O E w O °' < o . 0 0 0 co O r N N Q y) LL a 0 n O = b O Q O) Q n 01 N O 0 O q Q) O 0 6 O Q Q N d d m> N O 0 O Q Q d n n b -o= .c d f N to C Y N Om) o Q O P N r r ry O E >:. C• L e Q °m '- N O a m E u ld N N N O T V T a CO nj U d E in o a= E 7 p a O c• N Q N V C = N p rn 0 E o c>0 O CO (n F O "- C 01 N. Cf > 0 N (,� L .� M 10 (D V C (t°° 5 CD//C// O_ O C. N j f0 O r O) f0 O m '4' N N Y N !y Y O 0 ao Y. •O 1O> N co m O 0 N en n n C) C N V °J 0 or V- 0 co a 0 Q '- N m r r ri _0 U O O) )O r 0 70 N N it O -C O O Q ` r N co- O) O) u✓Zs a N N E y N LO ga U N N C• O O o C a N a .N3 ° > u o °c 520 2 a N N N N v y 0 o 0 0 0 0 o e c c) `C 6 o o rn o o )0 CO Ol l0 O co 0 0.- C d A m O O O) 0 0 N.' O) C 4] CO N E t U OI cp 0 o °O o 00 00 no n '0 0 6 C N E a < W CO c N co C 70 o° n Q m 70 W W t 10 N.7 C m j 0 Q vi t0 tD N N C N Ia0 .. N it a o N N r2 N 0 c a L N O 0 O '3 a U V N 0 N O U0 co 0 C - _° E -) N— N 3 co d 0 N O H Co > O co N N ' N -o C C c N T° CO CO m r U 0 o O m in c E S. c 0 .c °i C 0 p E 0 N N 2 E '0 8 0 2 E d 10 m o = O V Hd- 3 c a > A °� a o E co m E d 0 c C w c '0 ° ° d ` m 0 in - 1- CO L . � I 0 > m u m v m y u O C O) m .°1. � °)o CO \� o m> 13 ili•a U Sr • m d y a z ° a c r 'c °o) 0 K m:� d t 9 a W • 33 aila J I D < E 0 c 9 8. m r ? o CU U w y m .0 t`c o m 0S 0 y a c 0 0 °0 0) o m u c a0 0 > > t Q a q c m ■� 0 o � � uv � o • � am � i- C.) aw _a > F5 CC • P68 �� N m m m n N m N N 0 0 0 0 Ol 0 r m 0 m N m m n m O] W 0 0) Y a o 0 w 'c m o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0000031 F Q M to O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N IF al 0 N CO co C) r in a r co r r N 0 0 0 n CO O O f� 0 n n 0 0 0 n r Q 0 O. N O r r O r N N N N C] CJ N O N O N N N N O Ai 'cii- A Zr a Q Q m 0 0 co 0 co Q N Q a r Q N 0 0 0 0 N N a co 0 O co 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O 0 .- o 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 O O O O O O LLI O Op N N O CO N Q 0 0 Cr 0 0 N Q Q CO r N 0 0 0 0 N m 0 CO CO n N 0 0 0 A 0 m 0 O n a n Q N CO CO O 0 Q CO N O N C) N m r N 0 6 CC O f m o co n o m co o v o N to n co m o o n o r n co " N d n 5 0 0 — O 0 r a O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 m n 0 O n m 0 N 0 0 0 OI 0 OI 0 O O C) N N O Q O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Q O N O O n O O a N N O O 0 r O 0 r C) r 0 0 0 r 0 N a CO 0 0 0 r N n 0 0 a a 0 0 O O O O O _- '- O O r N N N o 0 N N o 10 R f0 0 N 0 0 N N o N N N N tG N 0 0 M y a Q Q < G Q Q < 4 Q < < Q Q < C G < < < Q < 4 < Q 0 o S CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000000 0 '00 0) 0 O m O O co a CO O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 o N 0 0 0 0 0 q N 0 0' 0 Cl 0 0' 7 r 0 CO m r OI m a 0 0 0 0 O N n 0 tO 0 a 0 {O NR' O O O r r 0 0 N O O 0 0 1 0 ON C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0) 0 0 O e- 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 're . O O Q 0 0 C) n 0 0 0 O O O r O O O 0 C) 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O O To 0 0 O O O O 0 r r n r O a 0 0 0 0 O O O C) n N O 0 N O C O O O n n a s 0 a 00000 0000000001000eINCOOCOMOV 0 0 0 a a 0 0 ON C O NCO 0 O N O O O a O O O Q Q C) O 0 O) O N 0 0 0 O Q O 0 0 O n a n 0 0 0 O 0 O O O 0 O a O co- Q 0 O 0 O O a O O O p m 0 0 0 00300 Ot n 0 a 0 0 O 0000000000 0 O N 0 CO a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 O) OI N a 0 0 0 a a 001110 Q Q 0 01 0 CO 000 0 Q P Q O 0 CO 0 Q 0 Q N N N 0 6 Q a N r N CO CO N Q r CO r a Q N CO O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O 0 0 0 7 0 0 O O O a 0 0 0 0 CO. a 0 0 0 a 0 0 CO 0 O a 0 0 0 CO 0 O O j 0 0 CO Q a a a O a O N a Q r 0 0 0 a O N 0 n O O n r O O a Q n n 0 0 N n r CO CO a N a 0 0 0 Q 01 r CO a 0 a 0 ` m CO N O 0 a 0 a a CO CI 0 VW CO a 0 CO n a N 0 0 0 C) 0 n Q r _ O C) co a N O Q O 0 0 C) a n Q 0 0 0 a 0 O Q 01 0 a C) Q n n r N Q Q r Q N r Y N 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 r r r OI 0 0 r O N OI N n r 0 0 r O On 0 q a 0 0 0 Q 01 0 0 0 0 a 01 Cr CO a a O Q 01 Q a O O o CO 0 0 0 M 2 p O Q co- co- Q Q Q a N N N C) N Q a N N n n N Q N n r a Q N N ea rn a C (3 C cE E d y 0 N co (� W co° °m oO o 0 0000000000000000 as 00 0 0 oo oo o O o °O 00 00 0 0 0 00 00 00 °o m m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U n n a O o 00000000000000000000000000 {6 CO C N to a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 C `m 6 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O a m a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 a a_ O a O a O O o o a a O O O a a O a a O a a O O O CO O O a O•L 2 M r a a Q CO a a Q a N N CO CO CO Q a N r N Q CO N Q N CO r a Q N CO G Q a cu C O y C ° � ON« a CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO Q Q a a a r N CO CO CO CO co co Q Q Y a a a O Q cm O O O O O O O O O O 00000000o ° O O O O O O O a a L 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 2 CO m n r 0 0 r m n r tl. n Eli N n n CO O Q Q n n o m o n r Q N r r N O 0 N r r N N N N 0 N N N O N N M N r N U d O 0 0 Q Q t0 0 0 co co co Q a a Q r 6 co co co 0 a a N 0 d o a a O o o a a a a a O o O O r 0 $ a a O a O O o 0 0 O 0 th 0 O 10 m 0 O c O ▪ 0 Q m r T N m Y N C Y S C Y Y Y Y I L Y Y Y Y Cj O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Z Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O CO 00 m m m m m m m CO CO CO m Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q LL F F F V- F f F F 1- F F F F m m m m CO CO CO m m m m m CO CO CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z > W W W W W W W w w W W W W Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q I CC K CC CC CC CC CC CC CC K CC K K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U V U U U U U U U J J J J J J J J > 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W V 0 0 K K m K K tr to K K K K tC K 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 y Z OI 01 Q .< Q .:c < Q Q Q < < < Q Q U U U U U O O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 q N V d = I I I S S S a Q Q 2 Q J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J Lii J U c a '0 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w W w w w w w W w 000000000000000000000000000 W W W O iO a to W W W W w U W W W W W W W w w W W w w W w W W w W W W Q LL LL LL LL LL U- LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O O a a o ' c C ,0 N N 0 • c c a E W 0 o O 0 • O U CO 0 N a n 0 0 01 0 a Q CO N 0 0 Cr 0 C) O Q r Q a N a 0 Q n 0 O > C V 0 N N N N C) Q Q 0 N O O 0 N N n C) Q Q 0 N n 0I 0 0 O 0 a s O a N a a a a a 0 0 0 p a a a a a a a 0 0 a a Co Q N in 0 I > c -' C co T T a 0 a C 0 q 0 C O) a I- 0 Q N Q $ 2 co° a 0 co > m LL n e o co m Q n co o 0 co n co m o Q Oo E J V LL K K fO U Z N d Q a CC co LL US N. > Q co> co LL V 0 O. O E W V 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 W W W co N co a m C) 0 N N 0 0 0 0 ry a a 0 W W w W w w w W W W W w w n m O m m n m Q Q Q Q Q Q CO O i E m 0 tC'I C0i CO CO m CO CO M M CO CO CO CO CO tm+O CO CO CN1 CO Cmi CO CO O0 ton O0 O0 CO O O J Cl) 0 o LL n n n n on n CO n n n on n n n n n n a m m m n CO n a m m re • P69 N Z.d. 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 m m 0 N b 0 0 N m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 r m 0 } a O y m 0- 000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 F C 6, 0 MO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A r r O 0 N 0 Q 0 ! N co (� O O r 0 0 0 m CO r N 0 co r U a E N N CO r O N r N O m Cr) N N N CO N N N N CCO O O O O Ri Q Q o a m en a a a m Q b m r a r a .- Q o Q 0 o b Y 00000000 0 01- 1- 0 0 0 0 0 1- 0 0 1- 0 0 0 0 0 O U. 0 m r m N b m r r O r Q A b 0 CO CO CO 0 0 r 0 Q Q 1- r r r r re A CO CO N Q Q N r N m CO CO m Q CJ N O p r 0 N CO 0 CO 0 O d O d 0 0 0 O O r r N r 0 ' N m 0 0 co 0 b 0 0 0 N N O N N Q C) LL d S OI N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 N000 0 0 0 0 Or y 0 0 r r N 0 N O 0 r N 0 0 b 0 r F N 0 0 b 0 b 0 0 CO Q N 0 CD Q O O O U) CD O r O O r N Q N 0 0 N C) O O r 0 7 r O N m 0 0 0 r (0 N N y N Q ✓ r N r O O r N r d d N N 2 d N N d d d (U N N R N N N d N N N d d r R CO CO 8 ad ad < ad ad ad <tri ad ,, < ad < ad a a a a ad ad a ad ad a d a a a 0 0 S O N O O O O O O O O N 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 O m N N D d O N O U) 000000 ,- N b 0 0 r 0 0 0 r e Q r N 0 m m CO co O O O r r Q U) M. V) r C) O O r 0 r N O r 0 0 C) r N Q C) Q s O: r r N O r N r N d O O CO CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N o O O 0 0 0 m 0N- C) m 01 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 ,- N N Q m CO Q Q 0 O O O 6 m b O O O O O o O O O 0 O O O O N O r 6 0 0 m 0 m 0 O '- 0000 N O O O O o o O O O C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 Q 0 Y 0 0 0 0 Q N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0N CO 0 0 CO 0 0 01 0 0 Co CO' r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O N m N m CI o 0 O m 0 0 0 0) m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O O O N 0 O O O m 6 m b O m Q m O N 0 0 0 0 0 m O N N Q 0 0 0 d O Q O O O N N O m r C) Q N C) N Q Q Q 0 Q C) Q N C) O Q N N 0 0 0 Q 0 N Q r r r 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b N 0 O 0 0 o O O O UO N N O o O r m an m m o o O O O O Ts O Ct 0 m r r N N V r 0 0 0 cri C) b 0 r O r 0 0 0 O N N m m 0 0 0 N N CO N r 0 N m m 0 0 0 m Q r N N Q N o b m N Of C) N O m N 0 p 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 N 0 b CO CO N' 0 O O 0 • Q r f Cb 0 m r m N r O N O 0 0 0 m m 0 N e C O 0 0 m r O O Q 0 f m 0 0 0 r 0 CO 0 0 m m m 0 m Q O CO Q O 0 Q Q O m O m m m O 0 Q Q m m V CO a ' m 0 0 mi RI N O d ) N 0 C C 0 CCN Q r M OI C N O C C E O « m di y to 0 0 a 00000000000000000000000 r m m 0 0 0 0 O 7 r O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m 0 0 0 = Wi C 0 j 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 °O °O ea Um) Um) °O °o °o 0 R — (v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A D. O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N 0 0 0 O O O O N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N m CI O O O O O O {— N p O b O O U) O O U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b b b b 0 O 0 U NI f ` N N O L C co N CQ C) CO 0 0 0 O. CO < CO Q CO CO N Q N N 0 O V V N N O r r r C O d C co o -, ,~ 0 0 N N 0 CO CO Q 0 b b N 0 N N CO CO C) Q C 0 b N 0 N 0 U) ' 0 0 O 0 0 q R o O O O O co O O O o O O O O O 0 O co O 0 0 o O O O O O co /� C O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LL r O O 0 Q m r 0 O r 0 a N O O CI 0 Q O 0 ` r C) m O o (O O N CO CO N N N N 0 0 0 N N O CO C) N N N 0 O U ^ d Q Q 0 U) 0 a a 0 0 0 o r y b CO a a r N N o y Q O O m li O O o a o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o m U 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: b m d K 0' c c 0: 0: c K 0' co - a s > it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0) O U aCO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ei F F c� 0 (.6 d (3 6c.6cjc.6 V co Q cn 0) Y Y Y F F F F 1- 1- F F F a Z Z Z CC CC W CC CC CC CC ' Z w W Q▪ a a O O O O O O O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O O a m m m f f 2 2 2 2 2 E fm 2 N N 2 2 N N N m 2 N N 0 w U J J Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z a a Q a a a a a a a a a a )` 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 0 0 O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 Z O O O O O O O O O O O O F F F F H H H F F F F F F a U U w w w w w w w w W w w w _, _ _, _, _, _, _, LL 222222 2G L 2 2 2 2 f F F F F F F IJ- F F F F F d 0 d Z Z <ir ' .al O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z 2 0 0 Z a d ...1 -1 JJJJ JJJJJJJJJ JJJJJJ d < d w QQQK QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ Z W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W D LIJ D LL LL z O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 c O � a a D w w w w W w w w w w W W w W w w w w W W W W w w w d Z d S S 0 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 9 J q 0 0 M O O a It C C 0 O N C H C G 0 co 0 0 E 0 0 I, U r 0 0 N C) 1- CO 0 0 r 0 b CO 0 m r r 0 0 m C) N 0 N N Q 0 0 Q N O O r CI CO 0 N m O r N N CO CO CO CO 0 m N 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 CD CO N U) N b 0 co 0 co N N b N b N 0 N 0 0 0 0 Q N N LO 7 0 eq to to cv N C T CO 0 0 9 U C 0 o `^ N 0 CO N 01 Q N6 ,060 m 0 0 0 N N N r N N 0 m N r N a 0 N 0 Q 5 O N N m 7 J D 2 a S 0 S LL NJ m 0 m 0. LL 0 0 0 ' O ✓ b p b Q Q Q 0 0 0 b b b O Y O N O N N O N O N N O) 0 n O O 0. j a a a O O O O O'O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C ° 0 n CO °v O O O < < Q Q Q Q Q O m 0 b 0 0 m CO CO N b N 0 0 > y C p Q O Q N m m m Cl CJ [7 N m 0 Ct C) C) C) CO CO CO w CO C) C) CO CO 0 7 r r a 0 LL n n m CO CO N CO CO 0 0 CO CO CO CO m CO CO CO m 0 CO CO m m CO (0 y E in in g c CY P70 t"1 _I y n m m r 0 O m N r a 2 O N N N N N N N N F a n CO a 2 O O O O o 0 N o 0 m m 0 0 m Q 0 a O o. r O O O O O W LLI N f� N CO m CO N O1 O N CO K co O N N m m m O m O O R Qq I� f Q m n Si 0 O .- CO m a n FE 0 .- ' O m 1.. N CO 0 CO ° g o v n n a n n On 2 N O r '_ O N CO CO 0 l0 2 T Q Q C Q Q 8 O E m O o N o m o N q E. n O O N. m N. 0 re N Q N O ' O (I) O O m co I-- O m n Q N 7 O N O W Q N Q 1. N > 0 N 0 m 0 0 CO m O yO A Y 0 0)0 0 ,- 0 p b 0- Y p O 1� h 0 CO 00 O on N CO N 0 0 O. m N 0 Q O Q N CO- 01 1� m m 10 N N N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO O m O O O O 0 0 0 0 01 To O Q O O O O m Q N CO N > Q ` Q N O1 N N t,- CO CO CO m CO N Q N CO m CO N O N - N t0 m n 6 N. O y 6 co -C I-- m m 01 N — N O N N O 000 m_ 01 0 N O N T E N O ' m m CO ry co C) C C 0 O C E E E H 0 ...M.' j O 00 0 00 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 °m, 7 v, co > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 co Ul6 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 C 1 `m 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m 0 0 N 0 n O m 0 0 0 o m 0 0 0 N Q O O N O CO N 0 N CO C m N - ni O ' co' t7 1p N t C - M V CO N N C O y C 0 0 0 CO Q m m O N , l Cl- O t0 co N N N N N N N N ` IL O = O N N N N N N N cTh U Q, a co 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO O O Q V N Q 01 1t CO N O O 6 0 >m U U N Q p a y o e w 0 J CO LA Lu T J 0 J J 0 )- a m N o< J w w 2 N U Q < ZO O 00 O U y O U_ O 2 wO O W m K Z U N N d X Q > W W U w 0 O w O1 a 113 2 W 1 > w U w e A N Q 2 F 0 2 0 i Q 0 0 ¢ _ .0 aw y v 0 < > < m m W c a E Z U U K U m 0 O O O F a a > > u 0 co C O In b S. N 0 N O m m N N C N N 0 0 V 0 C In co z N p, m o > > O m w W N u n :U o o co co cco U 0 a s o Q m r N CO m m C o m m m o CO 0' IOO D 0) 00000 `0 m m 0 U 2 m m m m m t'J U `0 N z' P71 • CO i- a ° CO U O. o a- «P ° LL 0 N o a TP ,m A A a 02 a 2 m r A T a O O 2 a m are N = N N 0 A O O 05 N N b Y O• ^ N m q h N N o O O O 7 N N N I O A O N d N Y N N m isi It 2 in /w N C C C O d y E Ev tts m g / y O> e U CO >c : r y O CO .. o a m in t d el m vi O 0 C N C O O c 0. N ix 2 N N C Z% a° a 0 `° s s •(....) a u = <co co 00 o cai A c o 0 > A A O CO r a co T N N u -' c v 'm A E N m N 0 > E C >a a Q c A = A co it 0 e 3 u E r I- 0 E N N id 0 Ill O C $ 0 a N to O 0 K 1- < - - a, U m a a > B io 0 0 a CL ap s a d 0 0 y m n N C N 0 O a, n N W n N m N ., yO A q N O 0 O a O a m a 01 N CI o V N a, T N a NI N N in T N 7. O a at a ° am r - `O vi r N w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C j0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 2 ; O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N N N a1 0 0 CO 0. O N 0 0 y E a o 0 of - 0 0 0 or 0 d O o 0 N O a, 0 0 0 a - n n 0 O) to a C) n to Kg a s N a 0 N N 0 w� O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 dw.N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IA W d O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O r C d 0 00 0 00 00 0 00 0 CO N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C) a N )°n o 00 00 0 u0) V) y 6 6 0 C0 C 6 r G d f6 G C 0 - > ' U ca .c o m m 3 L 2 z, 0 C d n it in N N N V O q /C/ O •∎ « N 0 0 0 0 CO N CV L6 O F CO CO 0 0 0 0 0 t N CC 0 O m 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 M r o to N 0 0 CO O N N CO N CO S'.. W O ,- N O U c y� n a a a a 0 0 0 cc 0 ce O O O O d O O O Z Z z ee K K K Z LL m m 2 2 2 Q O I- Z Z Z Z Z Z LL Q Q Q Q Q Q i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z, U J J J J J J a a W LL W C O E Z o O O O O O O 0 0 0 a a x x x x x x o Z o 0 ) Z a N JJJ a N Q a Tco U QQ aK Q < a U Z N N to¢ L O❑ 0 0 0 0 0 w C C LL LL LL LL LL LL 0 0 0 f a C 12 V O C c C O. d . C c O E LL c O u• N O °o of U 0 CO CO Nn a n Q °n S E O O N N N N N n N J CO O IS 7 O w d N Cq N a N C 6 N >` 0. 0 U C 0 n U 0 0 3 C o > m o U Q co n N 3 > n 2 q d \ Q 0o W o N -J) v v~) N m O) m 6 O o CI to C o u O J 00 > E y n n an 0.3 M M A > > O 0. 0 o J to 0 LL n n n n n n CO U) 2 0 W P73 c Tt; 7 0 oi) +E. L N a) C E N O C a -4; U — o C LL CO N A- 07/ Tao 0 J CA N (A 0 U O O o E v o Q o o • N v O N co 0. N a UE O 00 C 0 = c .O -• 0 03 Z „. .?4. O 0 ul A Q ON Z •U Cn C 0 0o 0 To co QCD "U (0 C 2 U O c Q • O Q ULo "• N N O N -0 7 N fA LL d1 P74 a m -0 0 m .a E n O 0 N Lo w a Iii w b cn «?, o c tD �t I O r M C = E "C•W in � >- w co r H M - -M Q ›la V N I N fts C o O — O c m ;a O r-.: s T▪ i • O w. CO Z a) U O m � a e [ o o g M c 1C1 .- N b y a> a co _ a m co o c O D Q C o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �a ca ui o ui o ui o Id o C co co N N e C.1 H w .Q a 42 .9 V o O 2 a P75 0 0 0 0 (0 0 (D 0 M 0 V (O N V O 0 (O 0) O O O N O n CO O O (O N CO N M M (0 M O O V 0 0 o to O ' (O O g r O N N N OM h 0 CO 00 0 N 0 0) CO V _ S c 7 0) v M m co A o0 00 A N 0) N ❑ q N N N h N V N_ r r O O O O O O 09 to O O O al 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 is o 0 0 00 00 0 °o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5' o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p . o a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a n m z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 2 ° CN N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M 0 ai ea U y m 01 N N N N NO ON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N orul e o 'v r N r r n n u In a' m m m O] o) 0 0) 0) O) ry N N- U- o N 10 m L O 0 3 0a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a C C C C cc cc C C C C C C C C C CCC C C X 0) C 7 7 7 7 7 7 ,7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 J el t) w C LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL a LL x Y Y Y wY Y IC) Y Y Y o E o In a Y - 5 5 Y Y Y a .c 0 C Y) 0 0 N N N N N 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 N N CO 0 0 CO N W cu 0 C m i 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 a 01 L C T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T a 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CCCC CCCCECC C 6- C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E 0 t 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E 3, CO w 0) 0 0 U O LL tt N r O 0 O r N 0 r N r N O r I� CO CO 0 CO M 0 0) t. O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C M M M N N N N CO CO M )O N N 0000000 co G ea 7 M M M N N N N N N N N N N O) O) E o r r h h r I-- h N n N r N IN- N N N N N N 0 E U O) CO 0 CO CO CO O CO CO O CO CO O 0 0 0 0 (0 10 0 CO U (O (D (D 0000 CO CO CO CO CO M 0 0 0 0 CD CO 0 (0 7 4 0 0 0 0 CO CO CO CO O CO v v v a v v a o 0 n y to to C C a N w E c c ? a y c c 0 z co o o ac ac 7o 0 ¢ a 0 a a m ,o 7 c 7 7 7 0 0 x j x 7 x 'o C a x h 7 u_0 c w n. w o a d ~ = w 1- w f- w a U aC o. Fw- a d U E Z E 'c 7 'v, a o LL a o Z O z C0 a o N LL o Q , w o w B v o o a w '3 w u w C 7 a w 'D a N a 0 a > y w C w C In w w CO w C > w c ?0 E K = o tn° m ce 0,.. K N ! a o oo m o o m LL N E o c o 0 0 0 0 co o w m rn m m 2' o) <ea o a a co LL LL LL a Q ro 0 co 0 3 3 3 r a CC S z a 5 U > > > U O O 8 m o. a LLLLJ11 0 o o E E U w ° LL. 00 0 2 n 'o w co 0 N N OM oi Z _N o E d O o o °o 0 m v '0 is Z Z N N -, N co < ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Q a 0 0 0 0 • P75 - 1 • 0 m N M co 0 0 m m m r m M m m C') O n h N M N O - CO )O 0 N n N N m O N- r O M CO CO. O r m I O to m r ' 6 O O O C') r m O M N O7 M N O O7 N- m h co N N O < M F m O N V V M M m m V m M co O N N N O N 0 A m (O m h N- O C m V m■ O OI ^ CO 0 0 0 CD CO CO n r- M N O m o A n N- ^ N M N N C) t9 69 69 69 69 69 H 69 69 al 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d O O O O O O co O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O A • d Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q CO m z z z z z z z z z z z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z ° C 0• M5 m m O O O N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N NI O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q u O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CO CO m N. n r N N N N N N N O m a ° r ? ? r 00) 0) r r r r r r r r r r 6, r LL O q N m t O O 3 O a a a a a a a a a -O a a a a a a a a a a a E 0 c C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C cc cc N C C C J = J J J J J J = J J J J J J J = = J J J J J co U CI C LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL X o E m E 0000 `0 0 w a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 C N Q y� .� Y Y Y Y Y ` Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ` Y ` Q p) t 0 C N `ry co w S. A A ry co O CO N N CO CO CO CO CO CO N N N N o O u > W tic' 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 M a C _ z C• T T T T T a >+ T T > T T T T T T T T T T T >. CO a m CO m m a) m 0 w a) a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) 0 0 0 N 0 )p C e C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C CCC C C C C ra O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E o c 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E Z CO C (O ✓ V LE" E LL r N C') m N O N O r N O r co M V m O r N CO CO G O O O O CO m CO CO O O O CO m CO O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V C V O V V C O O O) W m O7 N N N N N N CO m CO m m (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 0 E O m CO LO 1O h N. r r r h (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 CO CO CO M M M M LII u CO m m m m CO m m m m v y V v 0) 00, 0000 E u m f0 lO (O CO M CO CO M CO m m m CO 0000000 O 4 V V V d CO CO CO CO CO CO V V V V V N N N N N N N U CI) u C LL C li a O• E. J X J X c O N E LL CO LL O 0 a) E E ~ ~ a) ac C c C c a Q Z C n u a 0 c00 a) 00 a C C LL -0 •c LL o LL o 0 0 v]) J 0 X C o w N a) C 0 C X = U X U O 'C • LL N J O 6 0 O. J 6 a LL 0 J LL C 0 0 0 Q y O w a C ~ LL K CO a N LL W J w F LL w O Q 1- Q Q 4 u 2 a J is Q Q Q CO CO m C W a ry 5 Z n V m v+ n o u a C LL 'V a a a a a a a w O 0 0 C 0 2 0 0)0 2 '0 o N Q m 2 0 c c c c c C E c a) w Q w w w c c T m m m m° m m° m° aQ m° m m a c m° � a y E w e o 0 0 o h a N O) 2' IT O) G CO LL CO CO CO w E a LL LL LL to w C N N N N 3 3 3 3 0) 7 CO F a CC W_ E E c c CO j a 0 0 0 o W 0 01 V m Z N O ¢ 0 0 0 0 N a Z C c o O o O LL u m, Z Z Z Z O 0 0 0 LL LL L)_ LL O o 0 0 P76 W N O) ? 0 O 0 (D CO n N 00 CO Cl o N n N N n CO N CO V o r O 0 O o in O O n 0 0 0 0 0 ' N n n n CO CO C N no CO N 7 0 0 (0 N V .1 O ry N N 0 Yl U > m ad w En to (0 w of x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z ° p 0 z z z z z z z z ' E 0 y C m n n n n n n n n m c to o o o 0 0 0 0 o E 0 m m o 0 0 0 0 o 0 o d ca U co N N NN N N N N a in '0 1.0 10 'n )O 'n l0 C N N N N N N N N O U N LL 0 N ,- J LL O a 0 N L a)D) O N C C a 0 3 y S E « C V a a a a a a a D 0 '0170 a O 0 = = = = 0 C C C C C C C X CO c J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J o 0 C LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL L LL LL LL LL LL 00 X CO O N U E Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y O 0 0 u 0 o n. m m m m o c o o m m `m `m it `m `m E m e v Z a O L C T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T Y t^ re a C m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 m 0 0 (C ni_ C 00000 C C C C C C C C C C D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c E Z N N N (0 0 i0 t a U P LL it 0 CO d' N n r N (O CD 0 r n CO CO C j 07 a. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C L0 N (O N N )O N (O W 0 0 0) 0) 0 W CO C CO MI 7 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 0, 000) 000) E w E O Cl CO CO Cl CO CO CO CI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ E u 0 0 O) O) 0 0 0 0 n n n n n n n a u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) v N Q N N N N N N N N d V O O O < O jC u ) c 0 C (O C C 0 J O 0 I C IL a a L 0 E a a c. O J J C J 0 v C J J r u_ J Z LL c LL 0 0 0 0 0 MI C LL a LL LL Z F co C ry C O N O U y N a O J O C W S0 F if D Q w Q Q �_ w e u- r LL 0 c C 4 o a .0 u o `w o. ❑ o LL a m E a 4 7 o u U 0 J C 1,12 U N a N U N N a O N a O 0 o O N d E N C 0 O L a E Q 8 >- D0 u O) O a 0 0 0 0 0 N V it w rx o s 5 0 m a CO IT Ce a N LL LL Y (4 _ c E `o c 0 r E 0) o w o 3 T c v y a a CO Co 00 m c_ " z E N .) W N U O •0 O. 0 r w E w E z E Q E 0 > ¢ 0 N J • C J o In n U 6 O O 0 Q 0 Z co L O V 1-o m it m z t a a 0 V r o o o 0 z P77 STAFF REPORT Sit DEPARTMENT OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager af • From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation and Technology jr '" By: Sam Davis, Information Sr. Information Services Analyst Ruth Cain, CPPB, Purchasing Manage t Subject: CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF AN AWARD TO INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR FOR THE PURCHASE OF VMWARE SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL IN THE AMOUNT OF $67,758.04 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1001209-5300 (CONTRACT SERVICES). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve of an award to Insight Public Sector, for the purchase of VMware software support renewals in the amount of $67,758.04, funded from account No. 1001209-5300 (contract services). BACKGROUND The Department of Innovation and Technology has standardized on industry leading VMware software to provide consolidation of central computer servers, thereby decreasing support costs and improving management. In support of maintaining the City's computer services, support agreements are purchased to provide staff access to VMware's technical support and obtain software updates. ANALYSIS The Department of Innovation and Technology provided specifications to the Purchasing Division for review and to determine the best method of procurement. The Purchasing Division prepared and posted a formal Request for Bid RFB #15/16-001 Annual VMWare Software Maintenance and Subscription Renewal, to the City's automated procurement system. As a result there were three hundred three (303) notified vendors, twenty five (25) prospective bidders downloaded the bid documentation and three (3) bid responses were received. Staff is recommending an award be made to Insight Public Sector, the most responsive bidder. All applicable bid documentation is on file in the City's electronic bidding system and can be accessed through the City's internet. _ P78 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP L��J RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: July 15, 2015 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III . Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS, DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATES IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolutions initiating the proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the Annual Engineer's Reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. There is no increase to the current rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2015/2016. The Engineer's Reports are also on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has eight (8) Street Lighting Maintenance Districts that provide street light coverage throughout the general city and planned communities. Each year the assessments received are earmarked for the maintenance and operation of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. This maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance, including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area in connection with these Districts. The City utilizes prior year carryovers along with current year assessment revenues, supplemented with Gas Tax revenues in some cases, to meet the districts' annual expenses. When the SLDs were established, they were in.conjunction with the new development coming into the City, and were intentionally designed to ensure that each district bore the costs of the maintenance of the infrastructure that provides special benefit to the property owners. It has been over 20 years since there was an assessment increase in the SLDs, and certain districts will soon require an assessment increase in order to remain financially self-sustaining while continuing to provide a high level of maintenance. However, no rate increase can occur unless the City conducts an election process to give the property owners the opportunity to express their support for, or in opposition to, an increase in such assessment. P79 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PAGV.2 • THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS,PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS, DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S IN'T'ENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 THROUGH 8,INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FORA PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. JULY 15,2015 Over the last two years, City staff has engaged the community with a public outreach program and phone surveys to inform property owners about the status of their West-Side parks, landscaping and street lighting districts and to determine their willingness to approve redistricting with new rate structures to meet the fiscal challenges of the districts. This proposed, district would replace the existing PD 85, LMD's 1; 3A, 3B, and 5, and SLD's 2 and 6. These districts would be completely dissolved and their assessments eliminated upon the formation of the proposed district and approval of the levy of special taxes within such district by the qualified electors of such district. At the City Council meeting of July 1, 2015, the City Council unanimously voted to move the replacement district for consideration by the voters on the November 2015 ballot. As stated in the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Fiscal Year 2015/201,6 Engineer's Reports, the assessment rates shall remain unchanged from the previous FY 2014/2015 rates. The assessment rate and district description for each Street Lighting Maintenance District is as follows: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on arterial streets. The current assessment rate is $17.77 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $35.54 per acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on residential streets. The current assessment rate is $39.97 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $79.94 per acre. This district is operating at a 50% budget deficit and is currently being backfilled with Gas Tax funds to sustain services. SLD 2 is one of the districts proposed to be dissolved and replaced by the hew West-side District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Victoria Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $47.15 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $94.30 per acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $28.96 per single-family residence, the multi-family rate is $14.48 per dwelling unit and the commercial rate is $57.92 per acre. This district will require a rate increase in future years to maintain service levels. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Caryn Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $34.60 per single-family residence. It is noted that reserves for SLD 5 are completely depleted; this district is now operating with a significant deficit, and is being backfilled with Gas Tax revenues to sustain services. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $51.40 per acre for commercial property. SLD 6 is one of the West-Side districts proposed for restructuring to meet the fiscal challenges of the street light districts: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $33.32 per single-family residence. This district is operating at a significant deficit and is being backfilled with P80 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PAGE 3 THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS,PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS, DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS \WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 THROUGH 8,INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RA I E IS PROPOSED. JULY 15,2015 Gas Tax funds to provide services. This district will require a rate increase in future years to maintain service levels. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $30.60 per single-family residence. Attachments Resolutions P81 RESOLUTION NO. 15-116 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertaken proceedings to form and has formed certain maintenance districts pursuant to pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act"), known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, inclusive (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the annual costs for maintenance and servicing of improvements within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments shall relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2015, and ending June 30, 2016 ("Fiscal Year 2015/16"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. New Improvements or Substantial Changes in Existing Improvements. No new improvements are proposed to be added to the improvements to be maintained and serviced and no substantial changes in the existing improvements are proposed to be made for Fiscal Year 2015/16. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Reports. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare and file with this City Council an Annual Engineer's Report for each District relating to such annual assessment and levy in such District in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"). SECTION 4. Filing of the Annual Engineer's Reports. Upon completion, the Annual Engineer's Report for each District shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to the Assessment Law. P82 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on , 2015. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk • P83 RESOLUTION NO. 15-117 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "1972 Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of a separate report for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 (each, an "Annual Engineer's Report") in certain maintenance assessment districts known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, inclusive (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council a separate Annual Engineer's Report for each District as required by the Assessment Law and as previously directed by Resolution; and WHEREAS, this City Council has now examined and reviewed each Annual Engineer's Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth in each report, and is satisfied that the assessments on a preliminary basis, have been spread within each District in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements to be maintained and serviced, as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Annual Engineer's Reports. The Annual Engineer's Report for each District as presented, consisting of the following: A. Plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and the extent of such maintenance; B. An estimate of the cost of the maintenance of the improvements for the District for Fiscal Year 2015/16; C. A diagram for such District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed; and P84 D. An annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 of the estimated costs of the maintenance and servicing of those improvements to be maintained and serviced during such Fiscal Year, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within such District in proportion to the special benefits received is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Annual Engineer's Reports. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on , 2015. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P85 RESOLUTION NO. 15-118 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed certain maintenance districts and authorized the levy of assessments therein pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act") in what are known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, inclusive (each a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, this City Council has initiated proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/16, to finance the costs and expenses necessary for continued maintenance and servicing of improvements within each District; and WHEREAS, at this time, there has been presented and approved by this City Council, a separate report for each District identified by the distinctive designation of such District and entitled "Fiscal Year 2015/16 Annual Engineer's Report" (each, an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively, the "Annual Engineer's Reports") as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), and this City Council desires to conduct the proceedings to authorize the levy of the annual assessments within each District; and WHEREAS, the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/16 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Annual Levy Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Improvements and Maintenance and Servicing Thereof. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments within each District for the continual maintenance and servicing of the improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced within each such District. . P86 The improvements include, but are not limited to, street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities related thereto. A description of the specific improvements to be maintained and serviced within each District is set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The maintenance of the improvements includes the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement. Service includes the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any improvement. Reference is made to the applicable Annual Engineer's Report for further information regarding the improvements to be maintained and serviced for each District and the scope of such maintenance and service. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Reports. The Annual Engineer's Reports regarding the annual levy for each District for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 have been preliminarily approved and directed to be filed in the Office the City Clerk. Reference is made to the applicable such report for each District for a full and detailed description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced, the boundaries of such District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within such District. SECTION 4. Assessment. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order the annual levy of assessments for each District as set forth and described in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report, and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service as estimated in such Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 5. Boundaries of Districts. The proposed maintenance and service work as described in the Annual Engineer's Report for each District is, in the opinion of this City Council, of special benefit to the properties within the boundaries of such District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service chargeable upon each such District, which District said City Council hereby declares to be the District specially benefited by such maintenance and service, and to be further assessed pursuant to the Assessment Law to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Each such District shall include each • and every parcel of land within the boundaries thereof; as such District is shown on a map or maps as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of such District. SECTION 6. Public Hearing. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held the 5th day of August, 2015 at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting of the City Council, being in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, which is the time and place fixed by this City Council for the hearing of protests or objections in reference to the annual levy of assessments, to the extent of the maintenance, by any interested person and any other matters contained in this resolution. Any persons who wish to object to the proceedings for the annual levy should file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the time set and scheduled for said public hearing. P87 SECTION 7. For Information Regarding Proceedings. For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person at the City: Ingrid Bruce Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2700, Ext 2575 SECTION 8. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish, pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, a copy of this Resolution in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said publication shall be made one time and not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the Public Hearing. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk • I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on , 2015. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P88 APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS This Appendix A contains general descriptions of the improvements to be maintained and serviced within each of the Districts. Please refer to the Annual Levy Reports for a full and complete description of the maintenance and service to be provided for each District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on arterial streets that are throughout the City. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on local streets that are generally west of Haven Avenue. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but that are not within an existing local maintenance district. This area is located generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on local streets within this area of the City is known as "North Etiwanda". This area is located generally east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on local streets within this area of the City is known as "South Etiwanda". This area is located generally east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue. P89 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterials) • P90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIALS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P91 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P92 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 806,440.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 30,230.001 Total Estimated Revenue $ 836,670.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 119,320.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 955,990.00 Total District EBU Count 45,382.66 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 17.77 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 17.77 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P93 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. �c%OFESStom 4Q DREW6,7," � FG Z EL 15 No.C053672 - a \ Exp.6,40.1'?� u C(fg) \ _ CIVIL Q��P Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P94 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P95 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P96 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZJIeaA leJs!J P97 9 e2uoweDn' oy3uea Jo A1.0–I 'oN PP!Jns!O aDueualulew BullyBrI Taa- s Z'''<iC 9 01 a' cg N a=. c m s`y N a)ai o' v a – m ' T m w U) to U m i AV A2IZl3H0 I › cul 4 9.....__ ‘ < or dgigt444;;-- 1,1 ;. i, ce _ m = S! 0` m E E U a i! I i ° 4.. r.;. fj$ ! . j vma r i q yepuemo A`d`ddNVM113 'jri' r ' m V z /1b bpNbMU3 �� r O \ ,, , TA E CL •.� • �� = ° CI 1E1 N33110 AVO IIISall S N a P ,,50N P C nyia}sayoo. O 91-I V — AV�31S3H @O I g 5 <, P .V Palsayaoa 1—, W • tilli 11 4fie V Z ry - 1 " V ualMW } O AV N3NIllIW �� o CV a fik., ilivir,1 L. r. .° 1111 I ri C o 0 _ Ln 47. AV uaneH N V uaneH Q a) In .. . _ oar III J w .„. V esouuaH Z m d _J J AV VSOW1I3H y esouaH d x 4w a' o �wpm u y o '� = o AVa�V9IHMJV VPIegl4')N CO t; I W CO CO U _ wWHH J •• - � r ... IpINVIN113.1-1 I` �►" AV ueuglaH Z '• 4 L_ 1Th 9 Ir Z i F VPie(aun n ueyaweo 0 • � 1S3LIIHddVS pi. . 9igiy!BBa�8�3N�� t m a g 11 1 i r g 4f b a t.e, R gaPla�a+s1FaeY a I e°A sa V"�3i3G3 a it p eita' 1 .si• . J .. p�Q},9B9jiv•I �Jlle .' lE11111no-_ SadN - 8 B a aee-4 � P98 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 13,490.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 6,340.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 19,830.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 180.00 Membership Dues 50.00 Operations and Maintenance 7,990.00 Cellular Technology 1,000.00 Equip Operations & Maintenance 500.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,500.00 Electric Utilities 728,560.00 Assessment Administration 160,940.00 General Overhead 37,090.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 937,810.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 957,640.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 806,440.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 30.230.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 836,670.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 119,320.00 Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 955,990.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 806,449.86 Total District EBU Count 45,382.66 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 17.77 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 17.77 *Includes rounding as each parcel's annual assessment must be rounded down to the nearest even cent for County tax roll purposes. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P99 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 855,158.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (120,970.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 735,838.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA dues. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Telephones: This item includes the costs for master controllers for dial-in data lines for uploading, downloading and observing system operations for traffic signals. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P100 Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P101 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P102 • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 19.96/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P103 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Benefit Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $17.77 $17.77 29,060.00 29,060.00 Multi-Family Residential 17.77 17.77 9,943.00 9,943.00 Non Residential 17.77 17.77 3,189.83 6,379.66 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P104 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ JeaA leps!J P105 VT eSuounpnj o4puea jo R –I 'oN lo!Jls!d aDueualu!ew 2u!ly2!-1 laaJ;S F t it M u-> 0 w E o 6L. In r ' AV AJJ043 m ci;i c y N in C _ = (Y O I u) t 3 in O 2 •,„,,,, u Q Z h Ad lSe3 cn s 'fi r — R ny epuenn!;3 lea a) L. ny Jaisa400a ---— n y salsa oo 4 b ___ n ua w ! ny uampol 4 + i i ! ! 1 1 \. i j Ay uaneH - I._- Ay uane H AV esowJaH IC _ - --- ny esouuaH AV Pleq!4oJb' AV PleglgoJV ny uewpaH - Ay uewllaH (/) -c s v e ny pie is ue!!aweo _. 3a r* ! /1t4iPi{{6-fii il!Ititi e iva ce 6i, _ _ _ _ Ay ammo ; a a l� s'j c a v) c E n:: i3pxE111: ii,t t J = -c !{y _1 ai= -o as oo Q sif ti i tic c co iL iiitlii i c Eltfili ?li!i m i ,'i ,i ,pz • i l' f- ; s s ii= iitl i af_ f2';f.i5P--, tilkii_'t'f:_ P106 • ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $17.77 29,060.00 29,060.00 $516,396.20 Multi-Family Residential 17.77 9,943.00 _ 9,943.00 176,687.11 Non Residential 17.77 3,189.83 6,379.66 113,366.95 TOTALS 42,192.83 45,382.66 $806,449.86 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations • The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Annexation Total Total Parcel Number Date Project Units/Acres EBUs Property Type Single Family 0227-012-24 1/16/2013 TR18826 8.00 8.00 Residential DRC2011- 0229-192-09 & 18 2/6/2013 00255 1.81 3.62 Commercial/Industrial Single Family 1100-131-01 6/5/2013 TR18466 43.00 43.00 Residential 0225-161-19, 32- Single Family 34 6/19/2013 TR18744 30.00 30.00 Residential DRC2012- 0207-222-05 7/3/2013 00932 0.95 1.90 Commercial/Industrial 0209-151-27, 37 & 7/17/2013 PM18794 20.24 40.48 Commercial/Industrial 0209-161-24 0209-411-33 7/17/2013 PM19397 20.60 41.20 Commercial/Industrial DRC2012- 0209-032-40 7/17/2013 00790 3.17 6.34 Commercial/Industrial DRC2013- 0209-021-05 9/4/2013 00053 9.25 18.50 Commercial/Industrial DRC2013- Single Family 1062-211-06 11/6/2013 00427 1.00 1.00 Residential DRC2012- 0229-181-03 & 11 11/6/2013 01065 4.77 9.54 Commercial/Industrial Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P107 1089-081-16, 17, Single Family 20&21 11/6/2013 TR18819 17.00 17.00 Residential Single Family 0225-161-13 11/6/2013 TR18709 12.00 12.00 Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P108 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) P1O9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P110 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P111 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 363,810.00 Plus Gas Tax Contribution 350,170.00 Plus Interest Earned 1,820.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 715,800.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 2,580.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 718,380.00 Total District EBU Count 9,102.32 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 39.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 39.97 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said Street lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P112 parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. r @��QOFESS/py NDREW, F� y Q � No.C053672 ' ` \ bp.6,90 1 7 Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P113 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from,the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P114 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P115 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the entire City west of Haven Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ JeaA ieasI- P116 9 eOuoweanj otpuelj Jo Alpp— z .oN puus!a aDueualuieW BuiNOn laaans Z "eiii( w m = a) -o in c, o a w 0 7., I o J - 0 in (D 0 w w I m 1 AVAZIa3HJ I itz,A!FA 0 . 4 4.1 J 4�� t7,74 If Q j 7111. — i Y ' r co t 3 N =O _4 �14_ V11133 a Z m ny epueng3>� O .r !, �nVb,'at ����� IsA1 AV'VONVM113�� / nyepues93 N 3 QNVM113 ,� _•.. IIc WU R'I h- 4-3 V I f 1`� =ry o _w °^ l ,,74,..i �� _ cnE _ y • r �i ... 0 CO IPEIr■■■r 1 18J133e1@ AVO maw, Cl) �._...�.._.• _ _ _.. _ • FOP m s nyia;sayoo. Ill o [1 J �• w.z +:'";va�,�` 1150 9li .. V imp S 2l31S3H00i ^'. ct plIlrirt-t_]'_Av 1• . � I' �� V 1a15alJ�oa C CO )1 .f.. o V Q!1.111. tri C�11.; .�'iiiidl MENEM ^V�M!II!W .�..�..� d, p�(AV:N9)1111Iv W/1ti , .t1 o •os �r►wr�l�:;. n o c LIIIIII .Al M Et Cr 111 _7,- . ' .4/ 7 c MIL., . CO -13 to ACC , cr.s. . - i . , iv, N % 4r ...,drii Fill 14.1 '6,711'AV NAAVH - ' I d H CO 4a J M A l`ai� �i��-■i ! ;..r.-::11 .c_'11.1���. tI ':dm t �5i.� n esouua i.. co ! ,� :i3 L . AV.VSOW2�13H ;: IL',v of;x}:.J goy m� v H M 1•�� J 4.1.1. ti 4i!r_..2- 'M _fIII n• 1.m Ae. .a` .: AR T:; �'_I .. ,�r;. Orm. AVO1V8IHOIVt N MIR �4/+� ' wusAV•ISXH13WVI F! i. y {T ` F, i 1', AV uewlaH r r!'^� J.w`w •, ,d AV NdWl13 lam. AV II H ,I -1,,,a3s$ If 5t_j11-1 ,-. P via I , ,. s . S■ Z.. I, ' V Plefauy\IL lS ue!lawe0 O : ;xtC + ► cc, f I 2 1� � *..,.•� ::'rte�v.�'...Z .'��I�.. a = e 9 y�• 0 e . di_, � � �i QI ., a Bev 3� 4141 �P� IS V °C � `t�~ t @@9ogn'=9i4o 1,4111 I ° ■�� `. N yan00 9ge3roa� 0a1p�an ��� !' m 3 _ •=BZ a j Q.o of kro;t�a6 I o i Itrm"PYJ4a 4eA-11.I' ihtleDititeq a 3. Feik',rlitiiFa:1-1 ! itill z = i� .A1oElAiea.o3e 2i.A a a E py? � ate1K 3811,5'.29.1 txt, e.✓i 1 -0 8138. e�vuEgeeac ao w ''' n 1 B S?l E e I e 41 i A M{ P117 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 0.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 0.00 Membership Dues 0.00 Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Equip Operations & Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 678,480.00 Assessment Administration 37,400.00 General Overhead 5,080.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 720,960.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 720,960.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 363,810.00 Plus Gas Tax Contribution 350,170.00 Plus Interest Earned 1.820.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 715,800.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 2.580.00 Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 718,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 363,819.73 Total District EBU Count 9,102.32 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 39.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 39.97 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P118 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 208,392.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (2,580.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 205,812.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA dues. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Telephones: This item includes the costs for master controllers for dial-in data lines for uploading, downloading and observing system operations for traffic signals. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P119 Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P120 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the Cityy to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P121 • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1983, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU").method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. • A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P122 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $39.97 $39.97 7,033.00 7,033.00 Multi-Family Residential 39.97 39.97 1,989.00 1,989.00 Non Residential 39.97 39.97 40.16 80.32 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P123 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9I/STOZ Jean le3s!j P1 24 VI e2uoweDnj oq uea Jo Al!j—Z '0N lo!als!a aaueualu!eLl 2u!1ll2l1 laaJ1S N U) C.) in s\ ..... 0 0 c `1 o V (n '�/ u) ! d'. o d : _I N.- c in I m Lip Q RI i ww_w j nv Ise3 cn *et i rif)., v +L; I ny epuenn413 Ay epuenn!13 .}w J w a) i9 )laoi j Aea 51) 11 Jape:4008 I �a�sa ta• o0 n i y 4 �! i i ny ua�l!II!W t—.._.. .._.—..: ny uaml!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esouneH •°-` Ay esownaH Ay Pleq!4oJy AV Pleq!43J Ay uewllaH - AV uewllaH 0 L L Q p eA nv euln !S ueyawea Ce— _c m AV anal ! ;ia;la$ $ft b li L J L 5 fr�l! sl. _ a a) 'L p 00 !Vebi lligc co g ID f0 O Qgg a°bfP z$5 cc N co LL -sr r81,g21i$F 9999 1 l' 0;;Epg C.•.•.%...;,:; .*fTi P125 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $39.97 7,033.00 7,033.00 $281,109.01 Multi-Family Residential 39.97 1,989.00 1,989.00 79,500.33 Non Residential 39.97 40.16 80.32 3,210.39 TOTALS 9,062.16 9,102.32 $363,819.73 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Total Total Property Type Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 0207-201- 03/19/14 TR18817 94.00 94.00 Single Family 01, 21 & 44 Residential 0229-041- 05/21/14 TR 18870-1 166.00 166.00 Single Family 09 Residential 0209-122- 08/06/14 PM 19505 2.00 2.00 Single Family 01 Residential 0229-041- 09/17/14 TR 18870 125.00 125.00 Single Family 12 Residential 1074-281- 10/01/14 DRC2013- 1.00 1.00 Single Family 09 01001 Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P126 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) P127 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst Ill P128 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 6 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 8 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 11 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 14 Assessment Roll 16 Assessment Roll Annexations P129 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 352,370.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 14,680.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 367,050.00 Less Operation Reserve Fund Contribution (38,510.00) Total Expenditure Budget $ 328,540.00 Total District EBU Count 7,473.42 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 47.15 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 47.15 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P130 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment La QOFESS/C,gq Q�NREWG e: PSTy i ' m No.CO53672 � s \ Exp.6-34:1-1' 7 Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3-City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P131 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P132 If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P133 If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P134 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the 1-210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Avenue, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway and east of Haven Avenue, also known as the Victoria Planned Community, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. • Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ JeaA leDsH P135 L e2uouaeDnJ ogDuei Jo Alpo—S •oN lopls!G aDueua}ulew 2uRy2i1 Jaa14S a p i $_' � ys LL. $ {Y. t i w 1.- i ce'-- �C� Q t to r c •1/II/fl/I 7 LL ys, - 1I�-_I t-_ 0 o m co _ / .. W zs p ^N_ • • : • • i 44.11 • • •,• AVVaNVM11 Cl) U• Cl) • • •1.:•:•• •y: • I••.. •• : : :• ••• S + .0 • 1 0 •%.0...... • • • ... N7••a ('rr.•••••r1• • .a. _ • a••••f a : a • •8.•%041...,,t,.- 0—....\ O• af It %;h •• :.1)..1....4%.:. : •1i i •;•• O 0_ •••.1%.It.? 08 :•iy • •tom��•t • •0#•"1".= w O O • o .iA�.•ir;�:�•: A:1;:••• •••:• •46•L 1••••� C� dd, :3 • • • •• •• •� :• •••� C NHS ••i �•:% • • • ':.: : • • .....•:: 7 �ilb'Q 4.G. i,_ .....\ 0 J 1 N _9 Q •a• •••. < •••h•••• •••�•• AVii31S= M - m .°Z ♦•+•y'Z - •'�..j••••: ♦•��.• E J 9• g . . 1•�I u/ ▪ o ill ,C9 :...4: > ••I, •••••t * /... �>y _—. O i y x •••.•• 41.y•a* •••• I rr•: ,."`:; Ih t V LL ! l ''.1 •••? • sue•• •.• ••�• •••: •? •••••••...: .'..J?�dzt.a• ,, "' I II1 :♦x • :.#•1 •%• • •: ••• ...a. - .y N.4 , 0 1,i • • CV• T. -, . O b•I+•• �• •�• �••• :,•••,. J y r V S O...„:„..-:„,:. ......:464* .%11 Ill '$.4ertIT50,'];' c E , _•••,,....14.4,z • .'.,.V 1\\--tte :,', — '0 --..1 re to lel 42 It � �� ♦♦ •6d►r/ - ./7;-. 711 F. •S= 1r •61114-°BEioi.b.°@ ,i. ; •�f�1a:.a.Syq __ •�- /•=i¢r 3?Y ! "� I a a - y.Ja°q -, Y.r11, •MNY..w.w .n] 4/I /i r/c� r J - _. ( _,/° M y d a b°*t/F A 6 3 { .L,: .TIi �nnmru •Lmn ! 11, n,l►•K?�Ni P<, s g i.e 8 B .8.-..i• _ N 1 2"... _ _AMISH �r. @n 1 ? •1 ry.„, ��N N Iry' /�i�i .�/,/7-�-�-' Q 8 9 8 1 S B o_ e 0 ••. _ - a 11 N//�L r1 -':, - Y/ ` g 11 1? i g; B �'A, ''—Iluilit lif ;.11 fld/',4' �q� oe.eg-p41c11-�� . 9 9eB�� Be • •• � _1: :NS E trill. 1F�l?3� v' t,,7ry ii�?g el�Aygi���a& -L • •• s. 1 B •a• •• �c �. . a. :i•. - .11, �/ Pa t A�B to=a °6gD �._ '7 c` •. - ZYi '� fl- 8 a Q )3 9 .2 fl B tj?5 a P136 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 13,490.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 6,340.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 19,830.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 9,940.00 Equip Operations & Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 258,000.00 Assessment Administration 35,640.00 General Overhead 4,920.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 308,710.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Protects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 328,540.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 352,370.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 14,680.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 367,050.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (38,510.00) Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 328,540.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 352,371.75 Total District EBU Count 7,473.42 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 47.15 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 47.15 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 • P137 • The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 1,221,467.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (0.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 38.510.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 1,259,977.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Telephones: This item includes the costs for master controllers for dial-in data lines for uploading, downloading and observing system operations for traffic signals. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P138 Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Protects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3-City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P139 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P140 • • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1982, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P141 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) _ EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $47.15 $47.15 6,397.00 6,397.00 Multi-Family Residential 47.15 47.15 589.00 589.00 Non Residential 47.15 47.15 243.71 487.42 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. • Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P142 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9t/StOZ Jea), Ieos!d P143 St eSuoweanj oyauejl Jo AID—£ •oN 13uis!Q aDueuaau!ew Su!ry8!1 1aaa1S M a) v.. Lo V 1 .,„,,„, co rr tot E J .-... > is „ i (-1 .m.) VfA J . Ay lwJay° �.re I �i a) N I r L �03 0 I w w j L .L I nv epuerov43 ny epuemp CO i J j j l9 )1a9JO Aea ... AV J91994908 I ny:aisayooa 0...1 ny uatl!II!W r------------ I Ay uaTll!W I r I f 1 I i� I ny uaneN I Au jny uaneN f Ay esowJa- j I i .ny esowtaH i i� i AV PleTtIoay ! j AV Pleq!yo.iy e d j my uewllak i N ny uewll8H I 1 ny PJeAau!n is ue!Iaweo I � ] it111'` GAT T .- 6 ig -0 C m Q Sytal.;!Q } N f0 -tEl r T ye° ! 9 L "a C t„,6=i: EE6 I �•9 l'ail 72" iit ; 5y z= • P144 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $47.15 6,397.00 6,397.00 $301,618.55 Multi-Family Residential 47.15 589.00 589.00 27,771.35 Non Residential 47.15 243.71 487.42 22,981.85 TOTALS 7,229.71 7,473.42 $352,371.75 'Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Total Total Property Type Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 1089-581-01 05/21/14 TR 18212 67.00 67.00 Condominiums Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P145 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) P146 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P147 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P148 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment _ $ 164,000.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 18.540.00 Total Estimated Revenue _ $ 182,540.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution _ (37,930.00) Total Expenditure Budget $ 144,610.00 Total District EBU Count 5,663.02 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 28.96 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 28.96 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P149 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Lawl0ESSi 7/4- QF oREWS /SQQ�P lFG \` No.C05S672 m a cc aF Exp.6-1 7 ) CMi. a�P Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P150 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P151 matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P152 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Terra Vista Planned Community, which is located north of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue, east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road and includes the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ Jeame3s!J P153 9 e2uow on)ogDuej Jo Alit-t7'ON p!J sia apueua;uiew SuiltiSn laa.Ils J I I ► I I I I I , CO CO z • AV2131S3H0021 RCC 1,,-:=, :p u- .) , 03 v I I 1 - U Q 0 - 1 cn (5 u _ i i �'i - Z - D 11): p___ . Q y CV _ _ • N - 0 N • O :. _ Ii 2 .co • • , • co '.—^ I • a V AV N3NI11IW .� w • •• .� CO w • } O L J 5 w • LIU se rea N = C (.9 o. a • as Ln N • r L V qa J} OU m 4,-. w++ J L 1 (1) a ......„ . LiF,:i ; i 1 16111114140 . Nat* i g g..i IA °� �g9 1���ibb .deg 18404 11.!:11 Illwi v.!! 1211v 11111P11.11 641TO 41/411 -411111111111 '111! ,4 11111:1$ . _ it #i�aeslifi go !g • aSpbwfl wt. ` �. I .° flahit 4 iihial • • HAVEN AV N3AVH I I 1 I ■ P154 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 13,490.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 6.340.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 19,830.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 190.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 4,940.00 Equip Operations & Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 92,520.00 Assessment Administration 22,970.00 General Overhead 3,630.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 124,780.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 144,610.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 164,000.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 18.540.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 182,540.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (37,930.00) Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 144,610.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 164,001.05 Total District EBU Count 5,663.02 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 28.96 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 28.96 Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P155 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 515,845.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (0.00) • Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 37,930.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 553,775.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Telephones: This item includes the costs for master controllers for dial-in data lines for uploading, downloading and observing system operations for traffic signals. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P156 Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Proiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P157 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P158 • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P159 • development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier _Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $28.96 $28.96 2,652.00 _ 2,652.00 Multi-Family Residential 28.96 28.96 5,036.00 2,518.00 Non Residential 28.96 28.96 246.51 493.02 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P160 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9I/SLOZ aeai% leDsid P161 pi eSuoweDnj oyDueli Jo AT!O—b ON 13!.iis!Q aJueua4u!eLN Sung011 1aaJTS M. u, a, *a 10 Cl) J r 4 Q 1 J 17 V ! CC Ca cv i 1 a) m o # m 6 o 43 i u_ Q i i in ID L .L i AV epueN,!l3 —°—"—"i ny epuern!13 .en i \ i J i i , i \` I 0 19 NaeJ J Aep my Jelsayooa i n salsa o0 Iwo i ! y 4 a ny uaN!II!W f—.._.._.._.--..° i A 'ua)l!II!W i If i I ny uaneH i ,, i i my uaneH i i ny esouna4 i i i I i ny esouaJaH i I �, i AV Pleq14o4 1 1 i AV ple9!4oJb` AV uewllaH i '.�ny ueuillaH t � i ny P eAau!n is ue!lau:e0 i i h; i i ;04' i ■----r-1"------"-, Av eAwo :Writ...! -a in as o Ze 11210;1;11e a) > Il`ia 'f ii!i co as IWIlliiit ) of �.zL ;Vt9i•_ l!4E C; Wit!! al E! P162 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 $76,801.92 Multi-Family Residential 28.96 5,036.00 2,518.00 72,921.28 Non Residential 28.96 246.51 493.02 14,277.85 TOTALS 7,934.51 5,663.02 $164,001.05 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no Annexations for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P163 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) P164 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology • Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst Ill P165 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P166 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 44,150.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (70.00) Total Estimated Revenue _ 44,080.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 37.570.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 81,650.00 Total District EBU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 34.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 34.60 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's • Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P167 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of. the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law- Q%V*ESS1Qy Z w No.C053672 9 cc Etgk6301 7 4 Orillik* Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P168 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include. vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P169 matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P170 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of the 1-210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, west of Rochester Avenue and east of Milliken Avenue, also known as the Caryn Planned Community. The boundaries also include Tract No. 13835 east of Rochester Avenue and Tracts No. 13748, 13857 & 13858 west of Milliken Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5-City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9t/SIOZ Jea, leos!J P171 9 eOuoweanj oipuej Jo A ij—S •oN )alJTsia aDueualuieJ Suilg911 .aaJls m o • C m , O CV 01 C O �t , U) 0O m U) U m U) W p . I U) o co T / • • ..c.. 0 • • • • • • . • • rimilliCa Ad2i31S.HOOb •- ° — 1` d d r o ( ;_ Z :?-.-7 • . .i F- • tN -.,_, N j'.F ..S M ; • • , i o co ' • • • JL. \ co _cn } J • 1. • 7!1 L • • • ; CDT; j C N! • a • / w .1 .0 „.., o o c▪n 4)a_ 4, .,.J. • r ■,.. 4-�.p -. AV N3)11111164 lir 4'' IC% j 44)1164141‘11111, P I- Fl- ii,. iallfilldi - 1111111ig* 6- Ng II lift.\i•liw •17 an! h,c.. ,_ ___, cy _r: .1wj,. li.-„—2] - iljllhilIIJIIUit ,-.71 •_:... ea r . .s B l §irg11, t• rr. kk P172 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 4,250.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 2.000.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 6,250.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 8,990.00 Equip Operations & Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 58,080.00 Assessment Administration 7,020.00 General Overhead 1,460.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 75,760.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 82,010.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 44,150.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (70.00) Total Estimated Revenue $ 44,080.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 37.570.00 Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 81,650.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 44,149.60 Total District EBU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 34.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 34.60 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P173 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ (44,774.00) Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (37,930.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ (82,344.00) Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance • Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Telephones: This item includes the costs for master controllers for dial-in data lines for uploading, downloading and observing system operations for traffic signals. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P174 Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Proiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P175 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P176 • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1986, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P177 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $34.60 $34.60 1,276 1,276 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P178 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9I/SLOZ aeaA leus!i P1 79 VI eBuoweDnj opuea Jo A10–S ON 13!JTs!Q aDueualu!ew 2u111-15111a@-11S to a) a- 00 o N 7 J in r 0 1 ■'∎ v CL g cc to I lI J m o as u_ Q i n se `1r i I 1 i v .0 i ny epuenn!l3 "–`–"–"i ny epuennil3 i 1 !, i 1 r.+ i i cu i9 )laaio Aea.._.._ N. wny ialsayooa. 1 ny Jalsayood 0 I i i AV ua)I!II!W f—_.._.._ -- I ny ual!II!W i i i i i i AV uaneH i i I my uaneH i t4 i ny esownaH ( .ny esowJaH 1 i Ay PIe4!yiy o i i j AV PIe911-1oN ' i AV uewllaH 1 -ny uewIlaH to 1 L I I ny pJeAeu!A lS ue!lawe3 i i ., � i a in 0 °o Qe €i p # cc cc m lL 1111144 al CV l ilq ll cn O 1ig� 1t 01a .,.�, 11$18.1# i� . .: y.� 1:50''llii a dir+ei +E@t P180 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll • The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBU5 Assessment Single Family Residential $34.60 1,276 1,276 $44,149.60 *Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P181 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) P182 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst Ill P183 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P184 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 134,460.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 5,790.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 140,250.00 Less Operating Reserve Contribution (23,060.00) Total Expenditure Budget $ 117,190.00 Total District EBU Count 2,615.97 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 51.40 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 51.40 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P185 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. QOFESSi N� /0 O FEWS�F4 rn w No.0053672 cc Exp.6-30 [1 7 im?' O��P �vOF -.FO Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P186 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P187 matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P188 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the commercial and industrial area of the City which is generally bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the north, 4'h Street on the South, East Avenue on the east and Grove Avenue on the west. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ/eaA Ieosij P189 9 e2uoweonD otpuea;o AID—g 'ON ;ou;sia aoueua4uiew Sugg811 Taa.gs Co Z d rn Z` v '°r i i 0 0 c N g 00 m m W e El U � � V .a3H3 CO U CO li..,��;� • i 1 lyc� a e ; ilt�t va 8 m R u) , Jli 1 CD 0 rat f A7-MtNall moot Z > Av'Pawa V.VQNV J-4jml lri Af AVVONVMI CCW�� !-. r y_ o at m, a 't W., ter►� i�_ CO 1t � _w � rr��1��E2 N .- �1.1 6L Ila— ■...Q r Ipnr••lr t 18J13 Bel• ?WC • 11^`_ ' to .. .. !fC 5014.? ® TO uto all ~ =P�_1� _ \ Sa\ • C • •► 's r� e� J_Ava31s3Haoa a %�v a s J � l • •' 1 {� .. a ... ,.•��:�In„r' II t O (QVN3110 / 01 .� w � N x91111CtN -,Eb"1. J �-k, t��;mtf\1 soli lid T't a \i"li hit:• 0 rill S o .'2° 3/mac. r nor L* ntO r it ��„t lam: j• V sew r m W iii o lri r_I • v.i SEE g ! mill i) E . I o[4i�!11H�r-EJ itifita Ellrn.. r. t !.S lIIIIS.Ri G' , °gunr ec gi in au all! 2▪ J C s ..r..- 1I TIS� z I�t:, : hW.i. .Va :, ■r N m 1 r M P rig AV 0IVSIHO•V� yAfW IMMIMESibiirA ■ a> •V I1S1A21313 q "I Slijgg Iniyall:t. -. ;11a IS�IPRJ • . 1S'H`CIl3NTJ'do lw�i`��:. -z : • ' :•� K OI' IW I li� ..r •r ter.- ice r._, .. : JIr1•v 1 ° c 9 r�� 1 ' 1 q i 1111:111 1 111 y II�6' 9l�.�Pj]d^pAylig as I • al ! 8$#i liii 'tldi' 162;1 Alinliy11.iiflrut P190 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 13,490.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 6,340.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 19,830.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 6,940.00 Equipment Operations & Maintenance 400.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 80,800.00 Assessment Administration 5,600.00 General Overhead 3,300.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 97,360.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 117,190.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 134,460.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 5 790.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 140,250.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (23,060.00) Total Expenditure Budget $ 117,190.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 134,460.85 Total District EBU Count 2,615.97 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 51.40 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 51.40 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P191 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 407,632.00 Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection — Fiscal Year 2015/16 23,060.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 430,692.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P192 District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Proiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P193 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 • P194 • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1987, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P195 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units IProperty Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Non Residential 1.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Non Residential $51.40 $51.40 2,615.87 2,615.87 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P196 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. • Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ aeaA leDs!d P1 97 VI e2uoweDnj otpuea jo Alp-9 ON TD!J s!a aoueualu!eW Bu!T1 !1 loans Co *r is, .... N 1 Y w t _ Cl). > J ..J 9 ,1 a=i o � � ! �� ny ti�aya � c7,:11.1 ix I CI co o 0 ny lse3 in .0 i ny epuerw;3 ny epuenn!13 CA I J ' '' w i i9 1 eaJ0 Aea.._.. SD ny Jalsayooa ! �a;sa o0 n i y y 2i i ny uavII!W r._.._.._.._.—.._° ny uavll!W AV uaneH ny uaneH AV esowJaH ny esowJaH ny Pleq!yoJy ny Pleq!yoiy ny uewllaH .- ny uewllaH co L .c e ny pie is ueyawea cc ny 01\0.19 ili i it cn c m it 6 -z.; ie4 1. �1 J L O 00 .-i .1 11 t• i o '$ '' k ca cu ill "Irli.1 N (6 L7�! lei leg 1 Ili e=aa :•.•.% .. /14121.81/f1.1 C.; fiflfef a✓to P198 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Non Residential $51.40 2,615.87 2,615.87 $134,460.85 TOTALS 2,615.87 2,615.87 $134,460.85 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Name Total Total Property Date Units/Acres EBUS Type 0229-262-01, 05/21/14 DRC2008- 5.53 5.53 Non- 31 00185 Residential 0229-131-04, 05/21/14 PM 19448 74.75 74.75 Non- 17 & 25 Residential 0229-171-01 11/19/14 DRC2012- 4.77 4.77 Non- 00878 Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P199 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) P200 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P201 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P2O2 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment ' $ 126,010.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (330.00) Total Estimated Revenue $ 125,680.00 Transfer In-Fund 105,100.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 230,780.00 Total District EDU Count 3,782.00 Actual Assessment per EDU $ 33.32 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $ 33.32 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P203 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. QPOFESSIONq, Q4) PoREWs Fyc Q* e No C053672 m cc Expr63611 7 * _I'∎e��`` ..fpm' `fib► � Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P204 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineers Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P205 matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P206 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Highland Avenue on the south, Day Creek Channel on the west and City limits on the east and north. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9i/SbOZ JeaA IeDs!J P207 9 e2uowean0 otpuea;oAlit-L 'ON lDulsid aDueualuiew 8uily8l laans aHyo -�. a u .12? r sty 2 pi) J v Z' v d sue. $ rn o c � o (n m � m h f U m P 2 1 \ \ . J r - Z &) /]-- -tric /71/ 4345(s, icy A a DaNwi[i t. ;v e1/44,-:Is ,,r, . .' 0-, OL NO.• 1 NVWOUVM j_. 1 i=- _ a H lEnti+ _ , \ I.1 -IN - _ 1 �a __a_ mull - C o—_-° = _ t i _, A.- 2 1— a I"? im _ _ _1 • 2 J =• lel ■ i •_ ...„, ,,m _ _=r-_ _ w —i _ PI It Jo $ - 4 NI ( = N- •d AV..•ONVMLL3' AVtVON'VMI13I I- AV�ONVMII3 -'H r_ _.,, _ --V4 [W, 0, a 4_, co .H. - _ me beets. ‘1‘:t.411 - .t. 2se k q 9= i i 73�}+` Bed Gui G7 E3 E39IIeau U -,e N3aaT nYa.,. ,. _. HP , I 7 ' I keg {gg _ in... 1 , x.01 :•�(JII � 1+a, "-____t,�,,;., , If39€FII,.I .+$ -5..-t Fe I „, ....., 1 .° 1i1 1111 1111+j C; 4 --��tt 7 �!`'InI`��li',�ll i P208 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 13,490.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 6.340.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 19,830.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 4,940.00 Equipment Operations & Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 181,800.00 Assessment Administration 20,810.00 General Overhead 3,760.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 211,520.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 231,350.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 126,010.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (330.00) Total Estimated Revenue $ 125,680.00 Transfer In-Fund 105.100.00 Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 230,780.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 126,016.24 Total District EDU Count 3,782.00 Actual Assessment per EDU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 33.32 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 33.32 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P2O9 • The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ (35,854).00) Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ (35,854.00) Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P21O District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P211 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P212 • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1990, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No.7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P213 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EDU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 0.50 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EDU Units/Acres EDUs per EDU Single Family Residential $33.32 $33.32 3,782.00 3,782.00 Multi-family Residential 33.32 33.32 0.00 0.00 Non Residential 33.32 33.32 0.00 0.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P214 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 91/SIOZ aeaA leDs!J P21 5 VT eVuoweon0 oipueJ 40 A !O—L oN p!aas!Q aDueua4u!ew SU flL !1 laaa1S IN _N a, ,- � V .ft, E CD 0 V it nyAnayo C.• Z �' J tier o C ■ rx up o C4 S _ o `fur y L 3 •_ ra o 0 CO Z � Inv ise3 in *y L_ 1 ny epuenn!13 '� f 1 +.. I *we ny iaisayooel j - -1 I AV JaisayooZl i 1 Ay ua�l!II!W 1'._..—..—..—.._..° h ! AV uaVII!W i j I j ! j ny uaneH j j i i ny uaneH 1 I AV esowJaH i i !ny esoWJaH 1 r i AV Pleq14o.b' j 1 ny Pleq!4oi'rJ 1 1I Ay uewllaH I ny uewllaH 1 s I I 1 AV PJBAOIJ!n is ue!laweo i j ! y ■ `•�"��..�.�.•�••�r I'�•'r-e.... i !lump j r EIE1 I;r._.� t ____._. _i AV anwo 11Pli }� D N e m EL n 1 1112; ii == 'S 1•ai F 00 s O O i£f.l i l b i l 'a 6 ca o Q 11r ti1j1F1! m m u_ i # t•EI- !` a c Ejjgfi ; 4E�6 to m lit 71Trili 1 gg_ ¢ Ei' i is lint. 'I-Willis (0/.1r-.. .. ' 1;q/1111 1 P216 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EDU Units/Acres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $33.32 3,782.00 3,782.00 $126,016.24 Multi-family Residential 33.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Non Residential 33.32 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 3,782.00 3,782.00 $126,016.24 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexatio Project Total Total Property Type n Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 0226-081-06 02/05/14 TR18741 53.00 53.00 Single Family Residential 0225-191-03, 04/16/14 TR 18122 76.00 76.00 Single Family 04, 13, 15 & Residential 20 0225-381-06 11/05/14 TR 18034 7.00 7.00 Single Family Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P217 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P218 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P219 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 6 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 23 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 26 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 30 Assessment Roll 32 Assessment Roll Annexations P22O ' ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT I Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 70,430.00 Plus Interest Earned 24,180.00 Total Estimated Revenue _ $ 94,610.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (1,130.00) • Total Expenditure Budget $ 93,480.00 Total District EBU Count _ 2,301.78 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 30.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 30.60 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 • P221 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. 0 SS 51 4,,• EWSrF,�L� • tu No.C05367�.� a \ Exp.630 7 / Airip Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 • P222 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein;and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the Street Lighting Maintenance District No.8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P223 matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. • After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P224 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as South Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Etiwanda Avenue on the west, Highland Avenue on the north and Foothill Boulevard on the south. The southern portion of the District is bounded by East Avenue on the east and the northern portion of the District is bounded by the 1-15 Freeway on the east. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 �'��Y�. `-� �1 I IIIIITT11111� I P225 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 ak u Street Lights and Traffic Signals Improvements Ir.AUONr 1 IzlfolFWJ_J __ - _ I I Li211o.wESY�R P 024 O,FW�1g5SOWTHtRAIM ) HIGHLANDAV, HIGHLANDAV I isppR I " \i VIII , IiIIIIIiIJUk �il.11l �Mn croUST t 'MNPIQY6 PMI{ I h ASE LINE RD' 1111111(lAULLI 1111 iiT7TTI i & S Fit I 11 If I \� - RIAZIRe PMM - M The maps,data and gmaaphic information,("Information') mileble by and Nrwgh the City of Rands Cucamonga arc preswed u•public rcsamce dgmenl infamattion. f�rimjl]l� 'a J The Coy of Rancho Cucamonga makes nor i plite no O H sequence representation ccoxcy cmpla nWnH at to es content, of any saqumae,actuaryamplemeat atto hardiness dany C, C Limt eWormiided to ymheanxi and isdi sited to rely uRC �L' Wonthe Nfwmeify for anyreamandbn presented�ST MILLER AV. TheCityof anchoymymdWhdormrtion d withoM herein. --- 'Rte City of Rancho QlrmmSa e�licity mdweea,indu ni, tl (t1` 3scle®e my and Wrgaesm cations mdwmmtcs,httlWlnp, \^y _ but not limited to,the implied wurmtln of memhmtability and limen for a pmimla pmpota The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall neither accept nor assume my liability,regsrdlea,of the I. a®Won for(1)any enrol amieions a iftK m en in 1 any idemation provided and/or CH)my anion or maxim Y. waning due to my persons rclimce upon the information yl I L,, 3gY available herein. Itl QI+�JItl �aMPA PAM! SCE Streetlights FBTUDTHILL.BL o Traffic Signal Lights L-t� / Q SLD8 Boundary 0 0.225 0.45 0.9 Mile --------- City Boundary R......R„< I - If Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8-City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P226 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services • Regular Payroll $ 12,080.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 5,680.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 17,760.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 4,940.00 Equipment Operations & Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 57,120.00 Assessment Administration 10,030.00 General Overhead 3,420.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 75,720.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ • 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 93,480.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 70,430.00 Plus Interest Earned 24.180.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 94,610.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (1,130.00) Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 93,480.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 70,434.46 Total District EBU Count 2,301.78 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 30.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 30.60 Street Lighting Maintenance District No.8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P227 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 1,996,065.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 1,130.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 1,997,195.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P228 District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8-City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P229 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P230 • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1990, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P231 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 0.50 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $193.75 $30.60 1,171.00 1,171.00 Multi-family Residential 193.75 30.60 1,057.00 1,057.00 Non Residential 193.75 30.60 31.89 63.78 Church 193.75 30.60 5.00 10.00 TOTAL 2,264.89 2,301.78 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P232 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 r 9I/SIOZ JeaA leDs!d P233 VI eOuowe3n3 oyuuea Jo Al!O—g .oN Pu;s!a aDueuaTu!e(/J 81.]!T18r! ;aaJ;S CO a, 4.0 Lc, C.) ...... N low E CD Lo 1 ny AJJay3 p) o Ln CD i m .Z E CO °o 0 CO i u- Q i .._.._.._.._._i i ny ise3 6 mone i I D I L •C i ny epuenn!i3 I I ny epuer✓,!i3 i I *we l8 laaio tea ny Jaisayooa i IN* lAV Je;seyooa i Ay ua){!II!W f._.._"_.._.._.._ I ny Ue)i I!W I I 1 j I 1 ny uaneH I i i jny uaneH ny eSOWJaH I (t4 i ny esowJaH I 1 ny PleglyoJy I I ny Ple9!yoiy 1 I II ny uewllaH 1 any Uewll8H I L I ny p eAau!n is ue!IauJeJ i i i I ¢ i i �.._.._ ..__.._.._r ny anOJ9 ; ' aka u C m c (n � l`a 'fiiilj cu o Q !!!!!;11111 W m m u- i=1l4��; ji`'i a) c 1 ggys7,,#-1 CO 111!!ilflif ••• 3z 9 P234 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $193.75 1,171.00 1,171.00 $226,881.25 Multi-family Residential 193.75 1,057.00 1,057.00 204,793.75 Non Residential 193.75 31.89 63.78 12,357.37 Church 193.75 5.00 10.00 1,937.50 TOTALS 2,264.89 2,301.78 $445,969.37 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs • Assessment Single Family Residential $30.60 1,171.00 1,171.00 $35,832.60 Multi-family Residential 30.60 1,057.00 1,057.00 32,344.20 Non Residential 30.60 31.89 63.78 1,951.66 Church 30.60 5.00 10.00 306.00 TOTALS 2,264.89 2,301.78 $70,434.46 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Total Total Property Type Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 0227-121-33 08/20/14 TR 16578 6.00 6.00 Single Family & 37 Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P235 STAFF REPORT t ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP �s.. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: July 15, 2015 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Ingrid Bruce, Deputy Director, Department of Innovation & Technology.Q/ By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS, DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R,7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolutions ordering the preparation of the Annual Engineer's Reports to initiate the proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the Annual Engineer's Reports and, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10. The Engineer's Reports are also on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This year, the City will place on the County Tax Roll eleven (11) Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs). The assessments received for each of these Districts are utilized for the maintenance and operation of parks and other landscaping. Maintenance and operation includes but is not limited to turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, insect/disease control, graffiti removal, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls and all associated appurtenant facilities. The City utilizes prior year carryovers along with current year assessment revenues to meet the district's annual expenses. When the LMDs were established, they were in conjunction with new development coming into the City, and were intentionally designed to ensure that each district bore the costs of the maintenance of the infrastructure that provides special benefit to the property owners. In certain LMD's, it has been over 20 years since there was an assessment increase. However, no rate increase can occur unless the City conducts an election process to give the property owners the opportunity to express their support for, or in opposition to, an increase in such assessment. Over the last several years, Prop 218 election processes were held in LMDs 2, 4-R and 6-R, and updated assessments were approved by the property owners in those districts. LMD 8 held a Prop 218 election with a result of a majority protest; the City reduced services to meet the district budget requirements. P236 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PACE 2 THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS,PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS, DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1,2,3A,3B,4-R,5,6-R,7,8,9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FORA PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. JULY 15,2015 Over the last two years, City staff has engaged the community with a public outreach program and phone surveys to inform property owners about the status of their West-Side parks, landscaping and street lighting districts and to determine their willingness to approve redistricting with new rate structures to meet the fiscal challenges of the districts. This proposed district would replace the existing PD 85, Landscape Maintenance Districts 1, 3A, 3B, and 5, and Street Lighting Districts 2 and 6. These districts would be completely dissolved and their assessments eliminated upon the formation of the proposed district and approval of the levy of special taxes within such district by the qualified electors of such district. At the City Council meeting 'of July 1, 2015, the City Council unanimously voted to move forward the replacement district for consideration by the voters on the November 2015 ballot. In the meantime, the City has enacted a set of budget-balancing measures that are adequate in the near term to bring revenues and expenditures into alignment. The measures include staff reductions, expanding the use of contract mowing services, reducing the maintenance of site amenities (lights, playgrounds, sand, etc.) to the most basic levels, and providing less direct support to sports groups using sports fields. In certain other landscape maintenance districts, raise increases are required this year to keep pace with rising costs, especially for water. The assessment rates and descriptions for each of the Landscape Maintenance Districts are as follows. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parks and parkways. The current assessment rate is $92.21 per single-family residence, and the multi- family is $46.11 per dwelling unit. As previously noted, this district's budget is balanced only as a result of significant reductions in services. LMD 1 is one of the districts proposed to be dissolved and replaced by the new West-side District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos and parks within the Victoria neighborhood. The assessment rate for FY 2015/16 will increase to $464.97 per single family residence. This is a rate increase of 0.64% as compared to the prior year rate of $462.00 per single-family residence. The revised condominium rate is $342.18 per dwelling unit and the multi-family rate is $325.47 per dwelling unit. The commercial rate is $2,198.04 per acre, the Public Service parcels are $126.81 per acre, and the vacant rate is $92.99 per acre. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways on Hyssop Drive. The current assessment rate is $413.74 per acre for commercial property. LMD 3A is one of the districts proposed to be dissolved and replaced by the new West- side District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $352.80 per acre for commercial property. LMD 3B is one of the districts proposed to be dissolved and replaced by the new West-side District. P237 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PAGE 3 THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPOR I s 1 O INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS,PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS, DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAIN IENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1,2,3A,3B,4-R,5,6-R,7,8,9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. JuLY 15,2015 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos and parks within the Terra Vista planned community. The assessment rate for FY 2015/16 will increase to $408.21 per single-family residence, an increase of 4.29% as compared to the prior year rate of $391.40 per single-family residence. The revised condominium rate is $326.57 per dwelling unit and the multi-family rate is $285.75 per dwelling unit. The commercial rate is $1,326.68 per acre, and the vacant rate is $102.05 per acre. Until 2014, rates in this district had not been increased since FY 10-11. However, this created a structural budget deficit. Over the last two fiscal years rates have been increased to bring revenues and expenses nearly into alignment in this district. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of the Andover tot lot located on the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. The current assessment rate is $56.65 per single-family residence. LMD 5 is one of the districts proposed to be dissolved and replaced by the new West-side District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and paseos within the Caryn planned community. The assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2015/16 will increase to $393.17 per single-family residence in Zone 1 and to $294.88 per single family residence in Zone 2. This is a rate increase of 0.82% as compared to the Fiscal Year 2014/15 rates. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and paseos within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $307.05 per single-family residence. This district will require property owners to consider a rate increase in the near future, in order to maintain service levels. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $151.45 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and Garcia Park in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $80.00 per single- family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, trails and parks in the District. The assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2015/16 will increase to $711.71 per single-family residence and $1,423.42 per acre for commercial property, an increase of 10% over the prior year rate of $647.01 per single-family residence. Until 2014, rates in this district had not been increased for seven (7) years. However, this created a structural budget deficit. Over the last two fiscal years rates have been increased to bring revenues and expenses nearly into alignment in this district. Attachments Resolutions P238 RESOLUTION NO. 15-119 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertaken proceedings to form and has formed certain maintenance districts pursuant to pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act"), known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, inclusive (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the annual costs for maintenance and servicing of improvements within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments shall relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2015, and ending June 30, 2016 ("Fiscal Year 2015/16"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. New Improvements or Substantial Changes in Existing Improvements. No new improvements are proposed to be added to the improvements to be maintained or serviced and no substantial changes in the existing improvements are proposed to be made for Fiscal Year 2015/16. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Reports. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare and file with this City Council an Annual Engineer's Report for each District relating to such annual assessment and levy in such District in accordance with the provisions of 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"). SECTION 4. Filing of the Annual Engineer's Reports. Upon completion, the Annual Engineer's Report for each District shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to the Assessment Law. P239 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 151h day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on , 2015. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk • P240 RESOLUTION NO. 15-120 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "1972 Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of a separate report for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 (each, an "Annual Engineer's Report") in certain maintenance assessment districts known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, inclusive (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council a separate Annual Engineer's Report for each District as required by the Assessment Law and as previously directed by Resolution; and WHEREAS, this City Council has now examined and reviewed each Annual Engineer's Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth in each such report, and is satisfied that the assessments on a preliminary basis, have been spread within each District in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements to be maintained and serviced, as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Annual Engineer's Reports. The Annual Engineer's Report for each District as presented, consisting of the following: A. Plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and the extent of such maintenance; B. An estimate of the cost of the maintenance of the improvements for the District for Fiscal Year 2015/16; C. A diagram for such District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed; and P241 D. An annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 of the estimated costs of the maintenance and servicing of those improvements to be maintained and serviced during such Fiscal Year, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within such District in proportion to the special benefits received is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Annual Engineer's Reports. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15'h day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby . certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on , 2015. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P242 RESOLUTION NO. 15-121 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed certain maintenance districts and authorized the levy of assessments therein pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act") in what are known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, inclusive (each a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, this City Council has initiated proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/16, to finance the costs and expenses necessary for continued maintenance and servicing of improvements within each District; and WHEREAS, at this time, there has been presented and approved by this City Council, a separate report for each District identified by the distinctive designation of such District and entitled "Fiscal Year 2015/16 Annual Engineer's Report" (each, an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively, the "Annual Engineer's Reports") as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID,and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), and this City Council desires to conduct the proceedings to authorize the levy of the annual assessments within each District; and WHEREAS, the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/16 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Improvements and Maintenance and Servicing Thereof. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments within each District for the continual maintenance and servicing of the improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced within each such District. The improvements include, but are not limited to, turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation P243 controllers, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls, and all associated appurtenant facilities. A description of the specific improvements to be maintained and serviced within each District is set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. "Maintenance" may include the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: (a) repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement; (b) providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; (c) the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; (d) the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. "Service" may include the furnishing of: (a) electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for the lighting or operation of any improvements; and, (b) water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements. Reference is made to the applicable Annual Engineer's Report for further information regarding the improvements to be maintained and serviced for each District and the scope of such maintenance and service. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Reports. The Annual Engineer's Reports regarding the annual levy for each District for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 have been preliminarily approved and directed to be filed in the Office the City Clerk. Reference is made to the applicable such report for each District for a full and detailed description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced, the boundaries of such District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within such District. SECTION 4. Assessment. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order the annual levy of assessments for each District as set forth and described in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report, and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service as estimated in such Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 5. Boundaries of Districts. The proposed maintenance and service work as described in the Annual Engineer's Report for each District is, in the opinion of this City Council, of special benefit to the properties within the boundaries of such District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service chargeable upon each such District, which District said City Council hereby declares to be the District specially benefited by such maintenance and service, and to be further assessed pursuant to the Assessment Law to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Each such District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries thereof; as such District is shown on a map or maps as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of such District. SECTION 6. Public Hearing. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held the 5th day of August, 2015 at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting of the City Council, being in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, which is the time and place fixed by this City Council for the hearing of protests or objections in reference to the annual levy of P244 assessments, to the extent of the maintenance, by any interested person and any other matters contained in this resolution. Any persons who wish to object to the proceedings for the annual levy should file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the time set and scheduled for said public hearing. SECTION 7. For Information Regarding Proceedings. For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person at the City: Ingrid Bruce Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2700, Ext 2575 SECTION 8. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish, pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, a copy of this Resolution in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said publication shall be made one time and not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the Public Hearing. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 151h day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on , 2015. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk • P245 Appendix A Descriptions of Improvements This Appendix A contains general descriptions of the improvements to be maintained and serviced within each of the Districts. Please refer to the Annual Levy Reports for a full and complete description of the maintenance and service to be provided for each District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) • Paseos Street Trees Entry Monuments Community Trails Parks: (Parks within LMD No. 1 include: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and Don TiburcioTapia Park (undeveloped). Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Entry Monuments Parks: (Parks within LMD No. 2 include: Ellena Park, Kenyon Park, Victoria Arbors Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park and Windrows Park) Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A Landscaping: Parkways (includes ground cover only) Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Street Trees Entry Monuments Metrolink Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Parks (Parks within LMD No. 4-R include: Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park) A - 1 P246 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 Landscaping: Andover Park at Andover and Bedford (includes ground cover only) Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails Parks (Parks within LMD No. 7 include: Etiwanda Creek Community Park) Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Street Trees Parks (Parks within LMD No. 9 include: Garcia Park) Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Street Trees Community Trails Parks (Parks within LMD No. 10 include: Day Creek Park) A - 2 P247 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) P248 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P249 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 21 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 24 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 28 Assessment Roll 30 Assessment Roll Annexations P250 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 1,222,530.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 44 770.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 1,267,300.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (67,660.001 Total Expenditure Budget $ 1,199,640.00 Total District EBU Count 13,258.16 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 92.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 92.21 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P251 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. OESSlOryq- DREWSl 4 Lig) y w - No.C6j 9�OF Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P252 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P253 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition • to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P254 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City which is not located within the City's planned development communities. The District is made up of various landscaped sites throughout the City. As such, the parcels within the District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other LMDs within the City. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park. Site# Descriptive Location A-1 The north and south side of Wilson from Hellman to Amethyst. Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet Hardscape area: 5,694 square feet A-2 The east side of Hellman from 326 feet south of Pepperidge to 73 feet north of Pepperidge. Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P255 • A-3 The south side of 19th Street from 62 feet east of Mayberry to 173 feet east of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet Hardscape area: 440 square feet A-4 The south side of Wilson from Amethyst to Archibald; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald from Wilson to 105 feet south of Cottonwood. Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Court from Klusman to Diamond Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet Hardscape area: 1,864 square feet A-6 The parkway on the north side of Wilson from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon to Alder Ridge. Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet Hardscape area: 4,760 square feet A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata. Ground Cover area: 911 square feet A-8 The east side of Broken Star from 80 feet south of Highland to Highland; the north side of Highland from Amethyst to Broken Star including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland from Broken Star to Amethyst; the west side of Amethyst from 140 feet south of Highland to 265 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 6,545 square feet Hardscape area: 2,554 square feet • Mulchscape area: 14,005 square feet A-9 The south side of Highland from Hellman to Broken Star. Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet A-10 The south side of 19th from 170 feet west of Pilgrim to 167 feet east of Pilgrim. Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet Hardscape area: 1,084 square feet A-11 The east side of Amethyst from Lemon to 230 feet north of Apricot. Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet Hardscape area: 3,438 square feet A-12 The west side of Sapphire from 710 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P256 Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet A-13 The south side of Victoria from 110 feet west of London to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet Hardscape area: 3,480 square feet A-14 The west side of Archibald from 273 feet north of La Gloria to Lemon; the La Gloria median from Archibald to Jadeite; the north and south side of La Gloria from Archibald to 53 feet east of Jadeite; the north side of Lemon from Archibald to 55 feet east of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet Hardscape area: 12,030 square feet A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald from 610 feet south of Cottonwood to Wilson; the south side of Wilson from Archibald to Alta Loma Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald from Banyan to 190 feet north of Sunflower. Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald from 225 feet south of Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan from Jadeite to 410 feet west of Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 216 square feet A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst from 192 feet south of Sunflower to Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet A-20 The west side of Archibald from 210 feet north of La Colina to 230 feet south of Almond; the south side of La Colina from Archibald to Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood to Raspberry north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College. Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet A-22 The west side of Haven from Carrari to Vista Grove. Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P257 A-23 The west side of Haven from 434 feet north of Manzanita to 258 feet south of Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 48,390 square feet Turf area: 5,868 square feet Hardscape area: 4,581 square feet A-24 The south side of 19th from 286 feet east of Amethyst to 166 feet west of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet Hardscape area: 2,938 square feet A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest to Sun Valley. Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet A-26 The west side of Haven from 630 feet north of Wilson to Wilson; the parkway on the north side of Wilson from Haven to Mayberry; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry from Wilson to 382 feet north of Poplar, and the east and west side of Cartilla from Wilson to Poplar. Ground Cover area: 10,243 square feet Mulchscape area: 25,297 square feet A-27 The north side of 19th from Mayberry to 93 feet east of Castle Gate. Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet Hardscape area: 2,870 square feet A-28 The east side of Hermosa from 360 feet south of Manzanita to Manzanita, and the south side of Manzanita from Hermosa to Raspberry. Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet Hardscape area: 4,712 square feet A-29 The south side of Wilson from 240 feet west of Timbermist to Hermosa; the west side of Hermosa from Wilson to 213 feet south of Oak Grove. Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet A-30 The equestrian trail and plant material from the curb to the tract wall on the west side of Hermosa from 118 feet south of Hillside to 160 feet south of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet A-31 The south side of Lemon from London to Calle Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P258 A-32 The north side of Lemon from the Alta Loma Channel to London; the east side of London from Lemon to Cypress. Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet Hardscape area: 3,375 square feet A-33 The parkway on the east side of London from 158 feet north of Banyan to 310 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet Hardscape area: 1,160 square feet A-34 The south side of Alta Loma Dr. from Mayberry to Revere. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet A-35 The west side of Hermosa from Lemon to 125 feet north of Highland, the parkway on the south side of Lemon from 621 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet Hardscape area: 9,207 square feet Mulchscape area: 2,370 square feet A-36 The south side of Lemon from 385 feet west of Mayberry to Cartilla. Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet Hardscape area: 4,915 square feet A-37 The south side of Hillside north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl to 203 feet east of Eastwood. Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista. Ground Cover area: 500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,380 square feet A-39 The south side of Almond from Henry to Sapphire. The west side of Sapphire from Almond to 255 feet south of Bella Vista. Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The parkway on the south side of Highland from Jasper to Carnelian. The west side of Carnelian from Highland to 210 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet Hardscape area: 6,040 square feet A-41 The west side of Sapphire from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,784 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P259 Hardscape area: 812 square feet A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 132 feet north of Sunflower to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet Hardscape area: 5,772 square feet A-43 The north side of Base Line from Topaz to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet Hardscape area: 1,890 square feet A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire from Banyan to Marble. Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 9-8-99. A-46 The south side of Banyan from Northstar to Zircon. Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet Hardscape area: 7,890 square feet A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan from 180 feet east of Zircon to 186 feet west of Vineyard. Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 452 feet north of Cielito; 158 feet south of Cielito and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito from Cielito to 170 feet south of Cielito. Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet Hardscape area: 2,440 square feet A-49 The east side of Carnelian from 662 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Carnelian to Northstar. Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet Hardscape area: 6,972 square feet A-50 The north side of Almond from Sapphire to Crest View; the east and west side of Skyline from Almond to 595 feet north of Almond. Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet Hardscape area: 8,680 square feet A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven to Riverwood, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven from 400 feet north of Amber to 270 feet south of Amber, and the north and south side of Amber from Haven to San Felipe. Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P260 Hardscape area: 5,458 square feet A-52 The east side of Riverwood, from 188 feet south of Charwood to 193 feet north of Charwood. Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-53 The west side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The south side of Highland from Jasper to 308 feet west of Sard. The east and west side of Sard from Highland to Hunter. Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet Hardscape area: 4,740 square feet A-54 The west side of Beryl from 233 feet north of Mignonette to Mignonette. Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape area: 932 square feet A-55 The north side of 19th from Cartilla to Mayberry. The east side of Mayberry from 19th to Heather. Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet Hardscape area: 5,060 square feet A-56 The east side of Beryl from 410 feet north of Wilson to Wilson. The north side of Wilson from Beryl to 731 feet west of Buckthorn. The south side of Wilson from Buckthorn to Beryl. Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet Hardscape area: 5,436 square feet A-57 The east side of Hermosa from 115 feet north of Coca to 451 feet north of Coca. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa to 619 feet east of Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet Hardscape area: 6,794 square feet A-58 The west side of Haven from 510 feet south of Victoria to 1005 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet Hardscape area: 4,790 square feet A-59 The east side of Archibald from 820 feet south of Lemon to 448 feet south of Lemon and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon to 185 south of Lemon. Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet Hardscape area: 5,041 square feet A-60 The south side of Lemon from 290 feet east of Archibald to London. The west side of London from Lemon to Orange. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P261 Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet Hardscape area: 4,122 square feet A-61 The north side of Carrari from London to Archibald. Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-62 The east side of Archibald from Carrari to 505 feet north of Meadowood. Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet Hardscape area: 1,824 square feet A-63 The south side of Almond street from Carriage to Almond. Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet A-64 The east side of Beryl from Cottonwood to Wilson. The south side of Wilson from Beryl to 437 feet east of Beryl. The north side of Wilson from Cousins to 474 feet east of Cousins. Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet Hardscape area: 9,949 square feet A-65 The east side of Archibald from La Gloria to 328 feet north of La Gloria. Ground Cover area: 2,279 square feet Hardscape area: 2,411 square feet A-66 The east side of Hermosa from Waterford to 500 feet north of Waterford. • Ground Cover area: 4,695 square feet Hardscape area: 5,947 square feet A-67 The south side of 19th from 220 feet east of Sapphire to Via Serena. Ground Cover area: 3,208 square feet Hardscape area: 4,158 square feet A-68 The west side of Haven from Hillside to 783 feet south of Hillside. Ground Cover area: 3,492 square feet A-69 The north side of Hillside from 27 feet west of Mayberry to 191 feet west of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,002 square feet Hardscape area: 1,605 square feet A-70 The south side of 19th from 365 feet west of Amethyst to Amethyst. The west side of Amethyst from 19th to Hedges. Ground Cover area: 6,435 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P262 Hardscape area: 7,015 square feet A-71 The west side of Archibald from Hillside to Wilson. The north side of Wilson, south of the trail fence area from Archibald to 467 feet west of Archibald. Ground Cover area: 9,265 square feet Hardscape area: 2,609 square feet A-72 The south side of Banyan from 420 feet west of Archibald to Archibald. The west side of Archibald from Banyan to 389 feet south of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 10,270 square feet Hardscape area: 6,673 square feet A-73 The west side of Beryl St from 300 feet north of San Simeon Dr to 130 feet north of San Simeon Dr. Ground Cover area: 1,200 square feet Hardscape area: 600 square feet A-74 The south side of Highland Ave from Beryl St to Hellman Ave. Ground Cover area: 11,603 square feet A-75 The south side of Highland Ave from Amethyst St to 612 feet east of Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 106,409 square feet Hardscape area: 60,608 square feet A-76 The west side of Archibald from 635 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. The north side of Hillside from Archibald to 770 feet west of Archibald. Ground Cover area: 8,859 square feet Hardscape area: 1,389 square feet A-77 The east side of Carnelian from Brilliant Ln to Wilson including the irrigation cut-outs along trail. The south side of Wilson from Carnelian to 745 feet east of Arabian Dr. The irrigation cut-outs on the north side of Wilson from Carnelian to 775 feet east of Arabian Dr. Ground Cover area: 5,101 square feet Hardscape area: 11,322 square feet B-1 The median on Blue Gum from Etiwanda to Blue Gum Court. Ground Cover are: 5,100 square feet B-2 The north side of Highland from the Deer Creek Channel to San Benito. The north side of 19`h from San Benito to Palm. The west and east side of Alameda from 19`h to Ring. The east side of Palm from 19`h to Ring. Ground Cover area: 47,397 square feet Hardscape area: 26,285 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P263 B-3 The paseo from Sutter Ct to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 294 square feet Hardscape area: 400 square feet B-4 The north side of Banyan from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg. Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet Hardscape area: 3,834 square feet B-5 The north side of Lemon from Semillion to 188 feet west of Terracina. Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet Hardscape area: 3,894 square feet B-6 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to Semillion. Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet Hardscape area: 3,780 square feet B-7 The south side of Banyan from Cabernet to 414 feet east of Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet B-8 The south side of Banyan from Callaway to Muscat. • Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet B-9 The east side of Haven from Banyan to 240 feet north of Banyan. The north side of Banyan from Haven to Merlot. Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet Hardscape area: 1,356 square feet B-10 The east side of Haven from 400 feet south of Banyan to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Haven to Callaway. Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,348 square feet B-11 The south side of Banyan from Muscat to Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet B-12 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to 135 feet east of Valinda. Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet Hardscape area: 4,098 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P264 B-13 The south side of 19th from Inyo to 585 feet east of San Benito. The parkways on the east and west side of San Benito from 19th to San Mateo. The east side of Inyo from 19th to paseo south of 19th and the paseo running east from Inyo to Sonora. Ground Cover area: 17,563 square feet Turf area: 3,387 square feet Hardscape area: 14,192 square feet B-14 The paseo from San Benito and Sonora to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet Hardscape area: 540 square feet B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus and Lavine to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet Hardscape area: 428 square feet • B-16 The paseo from Inyo to Mendocino. Ground Cover area: 225 square feet Hardscape area: 184 square feet B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 918 square feet Hardscape area: 420 square feet B-18 The south side of Wilson from 377 feet west of Canistel to 1032 feet east of Canistel. Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet Hardscape area: 8,454 square feet B-19 The east side of Haven from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet Hardscape area: 8,865 square feet B-20 The east side of Haven from 341 feet south of Victoria to Victoria; the south side of Victoria from Haven to 237 feet east of Mango. Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet Hardscape area: 8,767 square feet B-21 The south side of 19th from Valinda to Inyo Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet Hardscape area: 3,700 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P265 B-22 The south side of Lemon south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 284 feet north of Marbella. The parkway on the south side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 517 feet north of Marbella. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul- de-sac on Sonterra Court. The parkway on the north side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 526 feet south of Terracina. The north side of Lemon north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 562 feet south of Terracina. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena Street. Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet Turf area: 6,390 square feet Hardscape area: 4,928 square feet B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon from 129 feet south of Marbella to 526 feet south of Terracina. The slope on the east side of Lemon east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella to 562 feet south of Terracina. The west side of Lemon west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. The parkway on the west side of Lemon from 517 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet Hardscape area: 4,468 square feet B-24 The south side of Highland from 327 feet west of Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet Hardscape area: 2,099 square feet B-25 The south side of Banyan from 152 feet west of Cantabria to 930 feet east of Cantabria. Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet B-26 The north side of Wilson from 590 feet west of High Meadow Place to 187 feet east of High Meadow Place. Ground Cover area: 4,628 square feet Hardscape area: 390 square feet B-27 The east side of Haven from 467 feet north of 19th St to 650 feet north of 19th St. Ground Cover area: 3,483 square feet Hardscape area: 6,235 square feet C-1 The north side of 26th from Andover to Hermosa. The east side of Hermosa from 26th to 331 feet north of Concord. Ground Cover area: 12,804 square feet Turf area: 9,423 square feet Hardscape area: 5,532 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P266 C-2 The entry monument on the northeast and northwest corners of 4th and Archibald. Ground Cover area: 6,337 square feet Hardscape area: 3,998 square feet • C-3 The south side of Base Line from Ramona to 128 feet east of Cambridge. Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet Hardscape area: 4,865 square feet • C-4 The south side of Base Line from 440 feet west of Ramona to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet Hardscape area: 2,200 square feet C-5 The south side of Base Line froth 340 feet west of Center to 103 feet east of Center. Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet Hardscape area: 2,215 square feet - C-6 The south side of Base Line from Ivy to 105 feet west of Marine. Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet Hardscape area: 2,475 square feet C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church from 142 feet east of Teak to 230 feet west of Teak. Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet Hardscape area: 1,650 square feet C-8 The west side of Hermosa from 524 feet north of Palo Alto to 142 feet south of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet Hardscape area: 3,996 square feet C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa from 163 feet north of Ironwood to 145 feet south of Ironwood. Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,848 square feet C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta. Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet - Hardscape area: 4,380 square feet C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl from Alder to 135 feet north of Culpepper. Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P267 C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman from Tryon to 665 feet north of Tryon. Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman from 500 feet north of Church to Church. Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet Hardscape area: 3,000 square feet C-14 The east side of Archibald from 196 feet north of Palo Alto to 530 feet north of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet Hardscape area: 1,374 square feet C-15 The north side of San Bernardino from Summerlin to 225 feet west of Summerlin. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet Hardscape area: 710 square feet C-16 The south side of Base Line from 286 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. The raised planter on the southwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,190 square feet Hardscape area: 2,320 square feet C-17 The east side of Hellman from 775 feet south of 6th St to 6th St. The south side of 6th St from Hellman to Golden Oak Rd. The west side of Golden Oak Rd from 6th St to Foxbrook Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,058 square feet Hardscape area: 6,387 square feet D-1 The east side of Rochester from Church to Base Line. • Ground Cover area: 11,126 square feet Turf area: 16,794 square feet Hardscape area: 17,301 square feet D-2 The east side of Rochester from 146 feet south of Chervil to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,908 square feet Turf area: 9,950 square feet Hardscape area: 13,263 square feet D-3 The south side of Base Line from Rochester to 600 feet east of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 2,180 square feet Hardscape area: 4,121 square feet D-4 The north and south sides of Church St from Rochester to 150 feet east of Hyssop Dr. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P268 Ground Cover area: 6,340 square feet Hardscape area: 8,887 square feet H-9 The Haven median from the 210 freeway to Alta Loma. Ground Cover area: 2,207 square feet H-10 The Haven median from entrance of Haven Village to Amber Lane. Ground Cover area: 6,968 square feet Converted 5,131 sq ft of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund. 3/25/13 H-11 The Haven median from Amber Lane to Olive Street. Ground Cover area: 5,026 square feet Converted 3,475 sq ft of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund. 3/25/13 H-12 The Haven median from Olive Street to 712 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 6,734 square feet Converted 3,933 sq ft of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13. . Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund. 3/25/13 H-13 The Haven median from 19th St to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 12,514 square feet FH-18 The Foothill median from East Avenue to 453 feet east of Cornwall Avenue. Ground Cover area: 5,450 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No.1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ.eaA lepsIi P269 OZ e2uoweDn3 otpueH 40 AID—T 'oN P!ns0 aJueualu!eI adempuei "`r 3 ' ° a F Z. Wit! c S g OIL i , e U e m L+uhol!aSS:Elg 5Y'5 8 o S m O ..tesv^.e.:iaip?Y4 ' I 0° E a E a � p a s in.`ii's=+I-.:tyr� Oil r., -S;g;i p:Y 1 YaE i O [� II i ; i Tioissy'ei'ue°Ef fl u p Y¢s5F i6Ga e F i in�ilzIgiiialFea m $ 33 m rc ei Ce; - e;85'ijc'ei El II "10 •• ! �: g a i AV eWer^g3 � , ntl eVUenug m ' ll Z S.■` ✓ � � L. It.L II 4.1 II U) r.._.. iz II 0 AV»roewoa — — srl ii IRt a C ii ()• +'' it C d II W E li ^v uarnew G>_ nvuay�ii� _ II rai 0, _.._.._rte ' 1 _._. i• cal L. ; : 7:— .,Ai v:� 0' II 1 d ^v uaeeH . �. _ ntl uaneH ••gg 7 '.' 't ■ co i ■It . 3 V AS ecauuaH: - — N i yesaw»H .II i II Min op ntl PIeGIWN1 �, •• -,i� i' II .^tl PlaQl4s,tl AV uewllaH j 1. O 'Y„ ° m 1•' y ntl uewllaH j Mg UST a> U a n p a AS weAau 1 IS ueilawe°i r i �• 1 • 5 U\ j '•I• i,, g --I co ,.G// g p N P270 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 15,760.00 Part-time Salaries 00.00 Fringe Benefits 7,390.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 23,150.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 56,220.00 O & M Facilities 9,500.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 2,000.00 Emergency Equipment& Vehicle Rental 800.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 3,800.00 Depreciation of Computer Equipment 0.00 Contract Services 455,570.00 Contract Services/Facilities 2,000.00 Tree Maintenance 50,000.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 2,630.00 Water Utilities 393,650.00 Electric Utilities 74,430.00 Assessment Administration 65,870.00 General Overhead 60.020.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 1,176,490.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay— Equipment $ 00.00 Capital Outlay—Vehicles 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 00.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 1,199,640.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 1,222,530.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 44.770.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 1,267,300.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (67,660.00) Total Expenditure Budget $ 1,199,640.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 1,222,534.92 Total District EBU Count 13,258.16 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 92.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 92.21 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P271 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the , maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 484,708.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ - Operatinq Reserve Fund Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 67,660.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 552,368.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P272 Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures Capital Proiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2015/16 • P273 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 • Fiscal Year 2015/16 P274 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by • the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P275 When the District was formed in 1979, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Benefit Unit Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Benefit Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Maximum Allowable Actual Total Total Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Rate per EBU Single Family Residential $92.21 $92.21 8,145.00 8,145.00 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 92.21 10,191.00 5,095.50 Non-Residential 92.21 92.21 8.83 17.66 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P276 District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. • Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9I/s1OZ aeaA leps!j P277 8Z eOuoweanj oq uea 10 AID—1 ON 1.Ju1s!p aaueuaau!eA adeaspuei N a) *r V .` *..• N Cl)' 4 E 0 z " 00o w V U C >II". f CO Q 0 C 0 • i ;I ny/iiayo --•• ; ► , rx le Ip m ca r o Q.. i m u_ Q f —..—..—..—. V pi AV lSea PIP 1 c 1AV epueM!l8 ny epueMu J I I 118 maaio Aeo ny..alsayooa I D .... I ny Jalsayooa 1 d.r ny uam!ll!W f-------1 l' AV uavI I ny uaneH ny uaneH • ny esouuaH c ny esowJaH nt/Pleq!Uoi d AV Pleq!yaJv AV ueuglaH ny uewIlaH (j) t ny pJeAau!A IS ue!laweo . 11111iti 'Ei 1!. ris'°jii -0 In IO�E cc AV `J =t•E ) n anon S (A c CO � (A i j .,,Ei J = 3 L �'}a �t'Et a) L sjtii,ii i In 0O Q ' 1411, i cc c co u_ 11:11111191!; F m t A t ;r SS :4. {A, .i s s. (kev.....:., 0;141 !I .t.e.;_:,-..- r:ii-iiilit: wailwit P278 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Maximum Property Type Allowable Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Units/Acres EBUs Assessment per EBU Single Family $92.21 8,145.00 8,145.00 $751,050.45 Residential Multi-Family 92.21 10,191.00 5,095.50 469,856.05 Residential Non-Residential 92.21 8.83 17.66 1,628.42 TOTALS 18,344.83 13,258.16 $1,222,534.92 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexation is effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year: APN Annexatio Project Total Total Property Type n Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 0207-201-01, 03/19/14 TR 18817 94.00 94.00 Single Family 21 & 44 Residential 0229-041-09 05/21/14 TR 18870-1 166.00 166.00 Single Family Residential 0209-122-01 08/06/14 PM 19505 2.00 2.00 Single Family Residential 0229-041-12 09/17/14 TR 18870 125.00 125.00 Single Family Residential 1074-281-09 10/01/14 DRC2013- 1.00 1.00 Single Family 01001 Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 29 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P279 Preliminary.Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2) • P280 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District(LMD 2) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2755 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst Ill P281 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 22 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 25 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 36 Assessment Roll 38 Assessment Roll Annexations P282 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2) (hereafter, referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 3,213,650.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 14,040.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 3,227,690.00 Plus Contribution from General Fund for General Benefit 328,570.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 90,960.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 3,647,220.00 Total District EBU Count 76,029.54 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 42.28 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 42.28 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 1 P283 parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. 10%w No. s s NA. &3o-1 L ss s ' .,t -4./..s. \ OFCAt Mark A. Steuer, Director of ngineering Services/City Engineer Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 2 P284 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 3 P285 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 4 P286 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the 1-210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Avenue, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway, and east of Haven Avenue, also known as the Victoria Planned Community, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements located in and serviced and maintained by the District generally include: the landscaping and associated landscape lighting and irrigation systems installed along the roadways, medians, and community trails; sidewalks; and 6 neighborhood parks that are of direct and special benefit to the parcels within the District. These improvements are located within the public rights-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris/graffiti, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements, including the parks and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of the improvement or facility; grading and replacement of trail surfacing; trail fence repair and replacement; and irrigation systems control, adjustment, repair and replacement. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include materials, vehicles, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Ellena Park, Kenyon Park, Victoria Arbors Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, and Windrows Park Site# Descriptive Location 2-1 The west side of Arbor Lane from the traffic circle to Church. The Arbor Lane median from Church to the traffic circle. The east side of Arbor Lane from Long Meadow to Church. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Day Creek Blvd. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Saintsbury. The north side of Winery Drive from Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 5 P287 Arbor Lane to 214 feet west of Arbor Lane. The south side of Long Meadow Drive from Freestone Court to Duck Creek Place. Ground Cover area: 93,639 square feet Hardscape area: 59,041 square feet 2-2 The northwest corner of Day Creek Blvd. and Church. The north side of Church from Day Creek Blvd. to 1,152 feet west of Hess. The paseo from the north side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The paseo from the north side of Church to Pine Ridge PI. The west side of Hess Place from the north side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The south side of Church from 145 feet east of Hyssop to 896 feet east of Hyssop. Ground Cover area: 24,018 square feet Hardscape area: 26,617 square feet 2-3 The west side of Day Creek from 250 feet north of Appellation to Church. The east side of Day Creek from Church to Madrigal. The Day Creek median from Church to Baseline. The south side of Madrigal from Day Creek to Roundhill. Ground Cover area: 35,420 square feet Hardscape area: 42,671 square feet 2-4 Victoria Park Lane from Baseline to the east entrance of Arbor Park. The southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Baseline. The southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane to 445 feet east of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 36,482 square feet Turf area: 3,874 square feet Hardscape area: 32,927 square feet 2-5 The east and west side of Victoria Park Lane and the medians from Mosaic Dr. to Church. Ground Cover area: 56,358 square feet Hardscape area: 20,390 square feet 2-6 The north side of Church from Arbor Lane to Day Creek. The northwest corner of Church and Arbor Lane. The paseo from the north side of Church to Wilson Creek Dr. Ground Cover area: 21,616 square feet Hardscape area: 15,159 square feet 2-7 The north side of Church from Victoria Park Lane to Arbor Lane. The northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Church. The paseo from the north side of Church to Elk Cove Court. The paseo from the north side of Church to Freestone Court. The northeast corner of Arbor Lane and Church. Ground Cover area: 16,609 square feet Hardscape area: 13,730 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 6 P288 2-8 The paseo from the west side of Etiwanda to Silver Rose Court. The north side of Church from Etiwanda to Victoria Park Lane. The east side of Iron Horse PI from Church to Wild Horse Way. The paseo from the north side of Church to Cloudy Bay Ct. The medians from Iron Horse PI to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 35,122 square feet Hardscape area: 28,473 square feet 2-9 The landscaped slope behind existing landscape of site 2-5 on the west side of Victoria Park Lane from 475 feet north of Long Meadow Dr. to Long Meadow Dr. The landscape slope and curb adjacent parkway from Victoria Park Lane to 685 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 26,213 square feet Hardscape area: 5,617 square feet VW-1 Base Line median from Victoria Park Lane to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 4,514 square feet Hardscape area: 3,474 square feet VW-2 The north side of Baseline 300 feet east and 200 feet west of Swanson. The east and west sides of Swanson from Baseline to Province. The paseo from the intersection of Swanson and Province to Atwood with outlet to Dunmore. The paseo from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Saratoga from Powell to Dunmore. The paseo from Saratoga to Etiwanda. The south side of Atwood from Victoria Park Lane to Travis. The north side of Atwood from Walcott to Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 18,753 square feet Turf area: 73,931 square feet Hardscape area: 22,615 square feet VW-3 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Baseline to the entrance to Victoria Village. Ground Cover area: 24,453 square feet Turf area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape area: 3,214 square feet VW-4 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood. Ground Cover area: 30,695 square feet Turf area: 10,242 square feet Hardscape area: 6,428 square feet VW-5 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 49,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,467 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 7 P289 VW-6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 285 square feet Hardscape area: 679 square feet VW-7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 266 square feet Hardscape area: 552 square feet VW-8 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Zinnia Ct. Ground Cover area: 40,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,150 square feet VW-9 The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from Barberry to North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park. Ground Cover area: 9,188 square feet Turf area: 3,851 square feet Hardscape area: 3,720 square feet VW-10 The west side of Victoria Park Lane from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The Victoria Park Lane median from Zinnia Ct. to Dahlia Ct. The east side of Victoria Park Lane from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 25,148 square feet Turf area: 37,350 square feet Hardscape area: 11,400 square feet VW-11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows Loop from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 23,082 square feet Turf area: 24,187 square feet Hardscape area: 6,988 square feet VW-12 The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkway on the west side of north Victoria Windrows Loop from Silverberry to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the south side of Silverberry from 390 feet east of Day Creek to North Victoria Windrows Loop. Ground Cover area: 149,010 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 8 P290 Turf area: 38,842 square feet Hardscape area: 12,868 square feet VW-13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from 390 feet east of Day Creek to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Snapdragon. Ground Cover area: 20,068 square feet Turf area: 16,476 square feet Hardscape area: 7,200 square feet VW-14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Snapdragon to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the north and south side of Sugargum from South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood from Sugargum to Blazing Star. The parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Silktassel. Ground Cover area: 21,466 square feet Turf area: 10,335 square feet Hardscape area: 27,560 square feet VW-15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way from Peach to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way to Citrus. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locust and following that curb line to Silverberry. The parkway on the north side of Silverberry from North Victoria Windrows Loop 390 feet east of Day Creek. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Silverberry to Nasturtium. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Locust to Pistachio and continuing to Bougainvillea. Ground Cover area: 45,929 square feet Turf area: 12,207 square feet Hardscape area: 23,630 square feet VW-16 The south side of Highland from 455 feet east of Day Creek to 534 feet east of Locust. The east and west side of Locust from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus east to Bougainvillea Ct. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Twinspur to Locust. Ground Cover area: 26,577 square feet Turf area: 23,922 square feet Hardscape area: 19,203 square feet VW-17 This site was modified and added to VW-16, 1-5-99. VW-18 The south side of Highland from 12583 Highland to Rockrose. Ground Cover area: 2,800 square feet Turf area: 8,515 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 9 P291 Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet VW-19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary to Rockrose. The east side of Rockrose from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland. The south side of Highland from Rockrose to Etiwanda. The horse trail from Highland and Etiwanda to the Fire Station. Ground Cover area: 21,027 square feet Turf area: 32,266 square feet Hardscape area: 11,298 square feet VW-20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Plum. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct. The paseo from Tipu PI. east to the open field. Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by VW-20 water meter, but is maintained by City crews. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet Turf area: 16,411 square feet Hardscape area: 9,132 square feet VW-21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct. to the trail south of Kalmia St. The trail and paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of Kalmia St. to Etiwanda Ave. and north to the Fire Station. The south side of Basil St. from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina PI. Ground Cover area: 49,187 square feet Turf area: 57,532 square feet Hardscape area: 19,600 square feet VW-22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose to the northeast corner of Windrows Park and from that corner to Plum. Ground Cover area: 13,689 square feet Turf area: 19,953 square feet Hardscape area: 9,489 square feet VW-23 The west side of Rockrose from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose to Twinspur. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Ct to Rosemary. Ground Cover area: 18,299 square feet Turf area: 3,452 square feet Hardscape area: 10,352 square feet VW-24 The M.W.D. easement from Jasmine and Ironbark to Sweet Gum Dr. Ground Cover area: 475 square feet Hardscape area: 4,730 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 10 P292 VW-25 The north side of Baseline from 384 feet west of Wanona to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Baseline to Craig. The Baseline median from Swanson PI to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 20,934 square feet Turf area: 3,079 square feet Hardscape area: 12,799 square feet VW-26 The paseo from Grape to 630 feet west of Grape. Ground Cover area: 7,021 square feet Hardscape area: 8,548 square feet VW-27 The south side of Baseline from 251 feet west of Swanson to Etiwanda. The Baseline median from Victoria Park Lane to Swanson Place. Ground Cover area: 18,816 square feet Hardscape area: 17,233 square feet VG-1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont. The turf and ground cover from Highland on the west side of Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane south of the horse trail from 475 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 275 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont. The turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground Cover area: 21,573 square feet Turf area: 47,604 square feet Hardscape area: 17,300 square feet VG-2 The turf on the east side of York from Delaware to Fairmont. The ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from York Place and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane west of Milliken from Fairmont to Milliken. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from Victoria Park Lane to Fairmont. The Milliken median from Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 273 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane south of the horse trail from 468 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 29,395 square feet Turf area: 73,608 square feet Hardscape area: 20,173 square feet VG-3 The turf and ground cover north of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Nova Ct. continuing on that curb line to York PI. and the turf south of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Armstrong PI. continuing on that curb line to York PI. The ground cover on the west side of York PI. from Fairmont to Delaware and the ground cover on the east side of York PI. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from Emerson continuing along that curb line to Armstrong PI. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola PI. Ground Cover area: 57,189 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 11 P293 Turf area: 38,343 square feet Hardscape area: 26,848 square feet • VG-4 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from Armstrong to Milliken. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Milliken median from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester including the paseo to Baylor. The ground cover on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Nova Ct. The turf on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Armstrong. Ground Cover area: 197,763 square feet Turf area: 24,151 square feet Hardscape area: 12,278 square feet VG-5 The paseo from Biola to Amarillo to Delaware at York. Ground Cover area: 12,448 square feet Turf area: 44,896 square feet Hardscape area: 7,992 square feet VG-6 The paseo beginning at the northeast corner of Victoria Groves Park and Fairmont and extending to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 73,442 square feet Turf area: 74,778 square feet Hardscape area: 16,629 square feet VG-7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly at Fairmont and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright from Donnelly to Pacific and the paseo from Pacific to Charleston. Ground Cover area: 43,427 square feet Turf area: 51,765 square feet Hardscape area: 15,806 square feet VG-8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park Lane from Milliken to Fairmont. The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 21,614 square feet Turf area: 8,614 square feet Hardscape area: 8,281 square feet VG-9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon Way. The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 197 feet east of Fairmont. The turf on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 316 feet east of Fairmont. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore Dr from Fairmont to Baltimore CL The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baltimore Dr. from Fairmont to Vanderbilt. The turf and ground cover on the east side Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 12 • P294 of Vanderbilt from Baltimore to Brown. The paseo from Vanderbilt and Brown to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 48,481 square feet Turf area: 11,357 square feet Hardscape area: 13,542 square feet VG-10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from 197 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken. The turf on the south side of Kenyon from 316 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken. The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Kenyon to 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Capitol from Brown to Bethany. The paseo from Capitol and Brown to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 34,241 square feet Turf area: 11,031 square feet Hardscape area: 5,320 square feet VG-11 The east and west side parkways and median of Milliken from Baseline to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Baseline from 542 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 31,367 square feet Turf area: 17,264 square feet Hardscape area: 25,524 square feet VG-12 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from the southeast corner of Milliken and Fairmont along the curb line to Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground over on the west side of Fairmont from the southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Fairmont (located east of Milliken) and continuing along the curb line to Milliken. The turf on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 53,068 square feet Turf area: 36,431 square feet Hardscape area: 27,004 square feet VG-13 The paseos from Victoria Park Lane to Verona, Verona to Napoli, and Genova to Tivoli. Ground Cover area: 17,993 square feet Turf area: 16,344 square feet Hardscape area: 8,376 square feet VG-14 The Baseline median from Milliken to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Baseline and following the curb line to Kenyon. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground Cover area: 89,456 square feet Turf area: 62,999 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 13 P295 Hardscape area: 44,826 square feet VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Baseline. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Rochester to Ellena East. The Baseline Median from Rochester to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Baseline and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 58,588 square feet Turf area: 57,306 square feet Hardscape area: 36,014 square feet VG-16 The paseo from Baseline to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia and Payola. Ground Cover area: 9,661 square feet Turf area: 11,529 square feet Hardscape area: 5,804 square feet VG-17 The paseo from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Fabriano to Martano. Ground Cover area: 35,351 square feet Turf area: 40,291 square feet Hardscape area: 16,394 square feet VG-18 The paseo from Rapallo to Gandino and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 4,281 square feet Hardscape area: 1,308 square feet VG-19 The paseo from Tolentino to Pizolli and to Tolentino. Ground Cover area: 12,555 square feet Turf area: 17,856 square feet Hardscape area: 7,380 square feet VG-20 The turf on the east side of Milliken from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken from 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the southeast corner at Milliken heading east to Fairmont. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to the northeast corner of Milliken and Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the west side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane to Lomello. The Victoria Park Lane median from Milliken to Pandino Ct. The Milliken median from Victoria Park Lane to 440 feet south of Kenyon. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 76,232 square feet Turf area: 97,979 square feet Hardscape area: 22,177 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 14 P296 VG-21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane to Lomello. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 547 feet east of Kenyon. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from Fairmont to 422 feet east of Kenyon. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Kenyon to Rapallo. The paseo from Kenyon to Bari. The Victoria Park Lane median from Pandino Ct to Portofino Ct. Ground Cover area: 69,167 square feet Turf area: 58,692 square feet Hardscape area: 34,478 square feet VG-22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 653 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 547 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester. The Victoria Park Lane median from Portofino Ct to Rochester Ave. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane north of the sidewalk from Kenyon to the east side of Vintage Park. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Vintage Park to Rochester. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 83,397 square feet Turf area: 89,674 square feet Hardscape area: 20,863 square feet VG-23 The turf and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to 409 feet west of Grimaldi. The ground cover on the south side of Portofino from Kenyon to Bergano. The turf and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark from Kenyon to the west property line of Rancho Cucamonga High School. The ground cover on the east and west side of Matera from Lark to Pescara. The ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi from Kenyon to Brindisi. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon from Lark to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello from Kenyon to Landriano. The paseo from southwest corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 63,733 square feet Turf area: 82,565 square feet Hardscape area: 39,297 square feet VG-24 The north side of Kenyon from Autumn Glen court to Woodruff. The east side of Woodruff from Kenyon to 403 feet north of Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 8,477 square feet Turf area: 5,320 square feet Hardscape area: 5,622 square feet VG-25 The paseo west of Torino from Kenyon to Highland. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the northwest corner of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 15 P297 Ground Cover area: 40,800 square feet Turf area: 24,134 square feet Hardscape area: 14,353 square feet VG-26 The paseo from Brindisi Ct. to Messina. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi Ct. to the end of the cul-de-sac. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Messina from the paseo to Treviso Way. Ground Cover area: 18,905 square feet Turf area: 1,141 square feet Hardscape area: 3,615square feet VG-27 The Milliken median from 440 feet south of Kenyon to Highland. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 4,030 square feet Turf area: 3,006 square feet Hardscape area: 4,222 square feet VG-28 The east side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground Cover area: 60,902 square feet Hardscape area: 5,593 square feet VG-29 The north side of Kenyon from Milliken to Fairmont. The groundcover on the east side of Fairmont, east of the sidewalk, from Kenyon to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 20,178 square feet Turf area: 16,877 square feet Hardscape area: 5,736 square feet VG-30 The south side of Tresenda from Santo to Sapada. The paseo from Sapada to Carano. The south side of Montella from Carano to Trivento. Ground Cover area: 6,797 square feet Turf area: 2,462 square feet Hardscape area: 4,860 square feet VG-31 The east side of Brienza from Larina to Letini. The west side of Tindari from Letini to Larina. The Greenbelt on the south side of Marconi from Trivento to Comisco. The east side of Comisco from Scalea to Santo. Ground Cover area: 23,419 square feet Turf area: 18,351 square feet Hardscape area: 13,764 square feet VG-32 The north side of Candela from Terini to Bettoloa. Ground Cover area: 20,172 square feet Turf area: 8,190 square feet Hardscape area: 8,292 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 16 P298 VG-33 The paseo at the north end of Sapri to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape area: 318 square feet VG-34 The paseo at the north end of Bronte to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape area: 318 square feet VG-35 The east side of Rochester from 555 feet south of Palmi to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane and median from Rochester to east side of Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 53,646 square feet Turf area: 11,150 square feet Hardscape area: 17,555 square feet VG-36 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 55,780 square feet Turf area: 10,500 square feet Hardscape area: 8,004 square feet VG-37 The paseo at the end of Ardmoor Ct. to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,350 square feet Hardscape area: 950 square feet VG-38 The east side of Milliken from 106 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon. The north and south side of Spring Mist Drive from Milliken to Summerstone. The south side of Kenyon from Milliken to Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 28,051 square feet Turf area: 4,533 square feet Hardscape area: 12,879 square feet VG-39 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from Kenyon paseo to 132 feet east of Milliken. The Kenyon paseo from Victoria Park Lane to Fairwinds Court. The paseo from Victoria Park Lane to the south west corner of Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 55,089 square feet Turf area: 13,120 square feet Hardscape area: 7,676 square feet VG-40 The south side of Highland from 413 feet west of Highland paseo to Highland paseo. The east side of Highland paseo from Highland to Kenyon. The north side of Kenyon from Highland paseo to Autumn Glen Court. Ground Cover area: 56,553 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 17 P299 Hardscape area: 12,314 square feet VG-41 The west side of Rochester from 294 feet south of Highland to Lark. The north side of Lark from Rochester to 1230 feet west of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 31,413 square feet Hardscape area: 13,338 square feet VG-42 The south side of Highland from 1314 feet west of Rochester to Rochester. The west side of Rochester from Highland to 294 feet south of Highland. The north side of Highland from Rochester to Woodruff. Ground Cover area: 40,346 square feet Hardscape area: 15,445 square feet VG-43 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and the median from Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Channel. The east and west side of Kensington PI. from Victoria Park Lane to Stratford Dr. Ground Cover are: 70,669 square feet Turf area: 7,888 square feet Hardscape area: 18,426 square feet VG-44 The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from 572 feet north of Silverberry to Day Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry from Kensington to Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 36,835 square feet Hardscape area: 24,376 square feet VG-45 The west side of Milliken and the Milliken median from the 210 freeway to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 10,658 square feet Turf area: 610 square feet Hardscape area: 5,589 square feet VG-46 The Baseline median from 657 feet east of Virginia Dr. to •Rochester. The north side of Baseline from 278 feet east of Virginia to Rochester. The paseo from the northeast corner of Rochester and Base Line to Huntley. The east side of Rochester from Baseline to 105 feet north of Shenandoah. Ground Cover area: 33,135 square feet Hardscape area: 19,340 square feet VG-47 The north side of Baseline from 400 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Blvd. Baseline median from Day Creek Blvd. to 595 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 9,515 square feet Hardscape area: 7,926 square feet VG-48 The east side of Day Creek Blvd. and median from Baseline to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Blvd. to 390 feet east of Day Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 18 P300 Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 50,318 square feet Turf area: 3,234 square feet Hardscape area: 29,217 square feet VG-49 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. The south side of Highland from Day Creek Blvd. to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 51,459 square feet Turf area: 3,930 square feet Hardscape area: 32,296 square feet VG-50 The west side of San Carmela from 389 feet north of Baseline to Baseline. The north side of Baseline from Carmela to 264 feet west of Durness. Ground Cover area: 18,043 square feet Hardscape area: 12,383 square feet VG-51 The Paseo south of Saxon to Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,398 square feet Hardscape area: 969 square feet VG-52 The north side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to Kensington. The south side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to 111 feet east of Suffolk. Ground Cover area: 4,362 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet VG-53 The south side of Victoria Park Lane from 296 feet west of Kensington to Milliken. The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from Victoria Park Lane to 397 feet south of Sugar Gum. Ground Cover area: 28,532 square feet Turf area: 11,070 square feet Hardscape are: 7,720 square feet VG-54 The east side of Rochester from Shenandoah to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,864 square feet Hardscape area: 5,136 square feet VG-55 The paseo north of Westhaven to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,775 square feet Hardscape area: 2,575 square feet VG-56 The south side of Highland from 1,317 feet west of Day Creek to 1,085 feet west of Day Creek including the non-irrigated slope on the south side of the sidewalk. Ground Cover area: 5,274 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 19 P301 Hardscape area: 1,761 square feet VG-57 The north side of Highland from Fairmont Way to the Day Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 16,157 square feet Hardscape area: 17,405 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the approximate location (for reference only — may not include all) of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites, and parks and community trails to be maintained by the District. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 20 P302 �` Vç/'!'Il ::; ;= �= H �1t`- V = W I E.v 3 (o 2 L,� `VVONt/+Ml� t ■ T ' b y� 0 _ gi N • ���� 3 1 t4 N J! nmia= a Ir t s> M ti,1•�l,• °o o';4 O .j o�� j• A� Nl SN3Q2iVJtlR101O1/1 r) NIP. 4tP co f0 1;410 .kcIlL12:,ei: :1-'-' . 1 L.**1.'( '... ::4-: -5° --..-....' Q 4N IINNIIIIIIIII' (.'J -,'•`.Iii. ,uIgt1 . > -` > iTIIITAIIi >3 111 Q Illir lilrYllr ]f 1111 N x a-\h' s. t Q O i IC a � 1(' > 0 iii- - `aaIA of EM lilj+ o i ' Q t� — - w n V ( -/inns 1 1 1 1■�.111141116 TTpp'�MMmmmt O LL CN7 ' ]• il1p Rlgppr...OI1/1� 7.T.�,0 C) > a > aj a OtGx N � ° to o et q --ra �' AV a3t~00H �■a p m a {N'qN I1111� J 0 z Q C47 y lilt{ C1 N N .":_ 1 ` 7s-. J ' ..fit/' /M Z > ii i1�1 � U' r !J1IUIIIUIII, �- > a f.:;;'= Ii: =z! IiIbfl Z O 1 :-=r". '`` ..� :.1. \egr cci� t�'mmm cmoS Q W O j °° �. 1'y' - r `'�; V rf=`R!i� �cm-o-smo a o�2-= •" y an:11 > > "� e� > 4 ,'., .•:. _ LU 5,,2gi'< ::,, 1,Nga� 0 ° ° , ° > 1 ;` t ,.; 7`\ i1 his 4,';� damg`.goo`c,..Enm.v,_ > > f? uulfllt. ? I_ f`f ,':' �C.1 °a� d�a€ =°sr� �og dAO� �IlllflllMINI, qN AV N3)1111 W O O.o Q1 '''4&_n r$= g t E £°6-ga hnu o O ° .I T iIJU. - > ,o �, 1 F- -1 > >� > LI 0 _ a 111►/�� I I > Z m B �ivallall I'1 l� a 0. _ it 1lunnnl` II y�`.�`� C E r.n u 'R 11 .t N+:aiqo .1.L. a F J i t r I p, .,,E. 11 m y 1� iiic.Ii, ! ,f `�/�� c g c d W sy <lii II u,,1, ,,,—cy 4 J N O O u r. N 10 VI / V �s< %u.'i• Oi�.4.."41 j, I ,10,4 of °-' o c of c x u 2 ' m assq 1 ,_� 2:8 • -w iwuquom.III I,- +i+,,,uy .��I S N to _ O Q.. �, • Plu 1. j`17p�1►�.. J 5 U a. n. - u_ '• Z ,. =RRN111 mwd p1• ' ious t•'it /4.0 � r3 1 ,Ils ,��r ,u '�f� 1 ,1 ii ri, P303 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 510,330.00 Overtime Salaries 1,090.00 Part-time Salaries 80,320.00 Fringe Benefits 249,370.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 841,110.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 67,150.00 O&M/Facilities 0.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 5,000.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 0.00 Contract Services 1,051,890.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 130,560.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,690.00 Water Utilities 1,118,660.00 Electric Utilities 108,270.00 Assessment Administration 34,870.00 Admin/General Overhead 223,250.00 Interfund Allocation 75,020.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 2,816,360.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay —Vehicles $ 0.00 Transfer Out-Reserves aoo Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 3,657,470.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 3,213,650.00 Plus Contribution from General Fund for General Benefit 328,570.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 90.960.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 3,633,180.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 14 040.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 3,647,220.00 Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 22 P3O4 Total Estimated Assessment $ 3,213,658.08 Total District EBU Count 76,029.54 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 42.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 42.28 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per Benefit Unit ("BU") will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be the same or lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum after the application of the cost of living inflator, as defined in this report, unless the excess increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Assessment Law. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 2,309,950.00 Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (90,960.00) Operating Reserve Collection — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 2,218,990.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 23 P305 Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 24 P306 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Introduction Pursuant to the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the California Constitution, and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by local agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Examples of parcels exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of- ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. Furthermore, Proposition 218 requires the City to separate general benefits from special benefits, whereas only special benefits may be assessed. As further detailed in the following sections, the Method of Assessment uses the following components to assign special benefit to each parcel: • Benefit Points: Assignment of points for aesthetic, safety and economic special benefits. • Benefit Factor: Multiplier. For residential parcels the benefit factor is units, and for non- residential parcels the benefit factor is lot size (acreage). Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 25 P307 • Benefit Units: Sum of a parcel's benefit points multiplied by the parcel's benefit factor. The total amount is the special benefit units assigned to a parcel. Apportioning of Special Benefit As previously outlined, each of the parcels within the District receives a special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services provided is identified and the proportionate special benefits derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. The total costs of maintenance and operation, less the amount of general benefits identified, will be assessed to the parcels within the District based on the estimated benefit units assigned to each parcel. To assess special benefits appropriately, it is necessary to relate parcels of different land uses and development status to each other. The benefit unit method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment since there is a total of 5,843 single family parcels within the District which represents 90.96% of the total assessable parcels within the District. The following shows how each parcel's benefit units have been determined. Aesthetic Benefit Points Aesthetic Benefit Points are assigned based upon the property's proximity to the improvements as well as the property's existing land use. All Single Family Residential parcels are located within the same proximity to the collective improvements (sidewalks, community trails, street landscaping and one-half mile from one of the parks). Each Single Family Residential parcel is fronted by sidewalk improvements, is within a one-half mile from one of the neighborhood parks, and uses the roads with street landscaping to enter and exit the Victoria Planned Community. In addition, the community trails are located throughout the District and serve as connectors between the different neighborhoods, school and shopping locations. All properties are within similar proximity to the trail improvements. Many trails are located along the sidewalks and streets, and all properties within the District have access to the trails through the various access points located throughout the entire District. The Single Family Residential parcels within the District are relatively similar in both building size and lot size. Since the improvements are provided uniformly throughout the District, Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 4.00 aesthetic benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Multi Family and Condominium parcels are within close proximity to the sidewalks, and receive the benefit of having maintained sidewalks for users to travel and access the property. Although these parcels benefit from the aesthetics of the sidewalks they do not receive the same benefit as Single Family Residential parcels, since Multi Family and Condominium parcels do not have continuous sidewalk improvements along the frontage of each parcel/unit. Multi Family and Condominium parcels are within a one-half mile of the neighborhood parks, use the roads with street landscaping to enter and exit their housing complexes within the District, and are in close proximity to the trail improvements. Accounting for the lower average household size of Multi Family and Condominium parcels, and not having continuous sidewalk improvements directly fronting their property/unit, these properties have a reduced level of benefit from the improvements. Multi Family and Condominium parcels are assigned 2.80 benefit points. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 26 P308 Maintained sidewalks and street landscaping create an aesthetically pleasing environment for both employees and patrons of commercial properties. The overall aesthetics, interest and desirability of commercial properties within the District increase, as a result of the maintenance and servicing of the collective improvements. Based on the City's Land Use Plan and residential designations of homes within the District, there is an average of six Single Family Residential properties per acre within the District (General Plan, 2010). However, given the nature of their property use type, Commercial properties do not receive the same level of benefit from the trail and park improvements in relationship to residential land uses. Commercial properties are assigned 16.00 benefit points. A handful of parcels within the District are used to provide public services (such as fire stations, schools, churches and other similar uses) to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. These parcels benefit from the collective improvements in place, but at a reduced level compared to a Single Family Residential parcel, due to the nature of the improvements and their land use. In addition, these public service parcels are in place for the surrounding community, and the existence of well-maintained parks, street landscaping and community trails is not a significant factor in the decision to locate those facilities. Given the nature of their property use types, these public service parcels are assigned a 1.00 benefit points in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements maintained by the District. Undeveloped parcels within the District receive an aesthetic benefit from the maintenance of the collective improvements, but given the very limited activity and pedestrian access that these properties provide, properties within this land use category receive a reduced level of benefit. To account for this reduced benefit, all undeveloped properties are assigned 0.40 benefit points. Common area, roads and easements are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive benefit from the increased aesthetics. Utility parcels are located based on their proximity to the parcels they serve, and based upon their property usage (wireless towers, flood control basins and fire trail/access roads) do not benefit from the increased aesthetics. The following shows the aesthetic benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Parcel Land Use Category Aesthetic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 Public Service Parcels —Church/Fire 1.00 • Station/School Undeveloped 0.40 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Safety Benefit Points Safety Benefit Points are assigned based upon the property's proximity to the improvements as well as the property's existing land use. The Single Family Residential parcels within the District Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 27 P309 are relatively similar in both building size and lot size. Since the sidewalks, trails and street landscaping improvements are provided uniformly throughout the District, Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 3.00 safety benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Based on the additional pedestrian traffic that commercial property generates compared to residential property, and that there is an average of six Single Family Residential Properties per acre within the District, Commercial parcels are assigned 18.00 benefit points. Multi Family and Condominium parcels are within close proximity to the sidewalks, and receive the benefit of having maintained sidewalks, trails and street landscaping for users to travel and access the property. Multi Family and Condominium parcels receive a reduced level of benefit from the safety of the sidewalks as they do not receive the same benefit as parcels that have continuous sidewalk improvements along the entire frontage of their parcel/unit. In addition, Multi Family and Condominium parcels have a lower average household size, which results in a reduced volume of pedestrian traffic on the sidewalks and trails compared to a Single Family Residential parcel. Multi Family and Condominium parcels are assigned 2.10 benefit points. A handful of parcels within the District are used to provide public services (such as fire stations, schools, churches and other similar uses) to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. However, based on the nature and location of the sidewalk and street landscaping improvements and public access to these properties, these parcels receive a safety benefit from the maintenance of the improvements. These public service parcels are assigned 2.00 benefit points in recognition of the benefit they receive. Well maintained green areas reduce the occurrence of crime and vandalism, and as such the maintenance of the improvements within the District create a safety benefit for the undeveloped parcels within the District. However, the safety benefit is reduced compared to a Single Family Residential parcels due to the very limited activity and pedestrian access that these properties provide. Undeveloped properties are assigned 0.30 benefit points. Common area, roads and easements are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive benefit from the increased aesthetics. Utility parcels are located based on their proximity to the parcels they serve, and given the nature of the property usage ((wireless towers, flood control basins and fire trail/access roads) do not benefit from the increased safety. The following shows the safety benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Parcel Land Use Category Safety Benefit Points Single Family Residential 3.00 Condominium Residential 2.10 Multi-Family Residential 2.10 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 2.00 Undeveloped 0.30 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 28 P310 Economic Benefit Points Accounting for the existing economic activity throughout the District, as well as the potential for properties to develop, redevelop and invest in their economic presence, properties within the District are assigned benefit points for the economic activity benefits received from the uniform and maintained improvements. Economic activity benefit points are assigned based upon the property's location to the District activities, as well as the property's existing land use. The District's improvements will allow properties to maximize their development, land use and occupancy rates. Residential land uses are assigned benefit points in proportion to the number of trips generated and average number of occupants per dwelling unit in comparison to the typical single family parcel. Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 4.00 benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Studies have consistently shown that the average multi-family residential unit impacts infrastructure approximately 80% as much as a single family residence. Condominium parcels are assigned 3.20 benefit points since the number of trips generated per condominium unit is approximately 80% of the typical single family residential units (Trip Generation, 2003). Multi-family residential parcels are assigned 2.40 benefit points per dwelling unit since the number of trips generated per multi-family residential unit, per the City's Traffic Study (2009), are 60% of the typical single family residential unit. To recognize the increase in economic activity and additional pedestrian traffic that non- residential properties generate compared to residential property, non-residential Commercial properties are assigned benefit points based on the average trip generations of non-residential property compared to a Single Family Residential property. Based on the City's Traffic Study (2009), and given that the non-residential parcels within the district are of mixed uses, the trip generation rate for non-residential parcels averages just under 320 trips per acre, which is approximately 5.6 times per acre that of a single family residential development. The trip generation rate is reduced to account for pass-through trips which are estimated to be 20%. Therefore, the economic benefit points assigned Commercial parcels is 4.50 per one residential benefit point. Commercial properties are assigned a total of 18.00 economic benefit points. The public services parcels and utility parcels within the District are used to provide services to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. These parcels receive no economic benefit from the collective improvements in place. Therefore, they are not assigned benefit points for economic activities. The availability of well-maintained sidewalk, landscaping and park improvements within the local community enhances the ability of owners of undeveloped parcels of land to develop those parcels, as studies have shown that there is an increase in demand for residents and businesses to locate within communities with well-maintained sidewalk, landscaping and park improvements. However, since undeveloped parcels generate fewer trips and given the limited activity these properties provide, they receive a reduced economic benefit from the maintenance of the collective improvements. To account for this reduced benefit, but still recognize development potential, all undeveloped properties are assigned 1.50 benefit points. Common areas and roads are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive an economic benefit. The following shows the economic benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 29 P311 Parcel Land Use Category Economic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 3.20 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels— Church/Fire 0.00 Station/School Undeveloped 1.50 Common Area/Roads/Utility 0.00 Total Special Benefit Points Calculation The formula below shows the total special benefit points calculation for each parcel within the District: Parcel's Total Parcel's Parcel's Parcel's Special Benefit = Aesthetic t Safety + Economic Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Parcel Factors The method of apportioning the benefit to the parcels within the District reflects the proportional special benefit assigned to each property within the District based upon various property characteristics of parcels as compared to other properties within the District. By adjusting the assigned special benefit points set forth above by parcel factors, a more complete picture of the proportional special benefits received by each parcel within the District is presented. Given that the special benefits provided by the District focus on aesthetic benefit, safety benefit, and economic activity benefits, it was determined that lot size (acreage) for non-residential parcels and units for residential parcels were the most appropriate parcel factors. The number of units for non-residential parcels would not accurately reflect the amount of development and redevelopment that may occur. In addition, a larger parcel allows for a greater area to develop and redevelop than smaller parcels, which corresponds to larger parcels receiving proportionately greater aesthetic, safety and economic activity benefits when compared to smaller parcels within the District. Therefore, the benefits assigned for each parcel in the District is in direct proportion to the size of the parcel and potential development of the parcel. Residential parcels are limited by the number of units on the parcel more than the actual lot size. However, the greater the lot size, the more units can be placed on a parcel, and the more persons who use and benefits from the collective improvements. Therefore the benefits assigned for each parcel in the District is in direct proportion to the units assigned to that parcel. The formula below shows the parcel factor calculation for each parcel within the District: Residential Parcel Factor = Units Non-Residential Parcel Factor = Acreage Total Benefit Units per Parcel Calculation Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 30 P312 To appropriately quantify and assign the total benefit units for each parcel within the District, the total special benefit points are further adjusted according to the formula below: Parcel's Total Parcel's Total Parcel Benefit Units = Special Benefit X Factor Points Total Special Benefit Units The total special benefit units for the District at this time are 76,064.85. Data Considerations and Parcel Changes The use of the latest Assessor's Secured Roll information has been and shall be used in the future as the basis in determining each parcel's land use category, units and lot size (acreage), unless better data was or is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number, the land use category, units and lot size (acreage) of the subsequent valid parcels shall serve as the basis in assigning parcel factor special benefit units. If a single parcel changes to multiple parcels, the special benefit units shall be recalculated based on the property type, number of units and acreage data for the new parcels, rather than each new parcel receiving a proportionate share of the original assessment. Special Considerations: Publicly Owned Parcels Any publicly owned parcels that benefit from the improvements cannot be exempt from the assessment. The special benefits accruing to these types of parcels must be determined using the same kind of formulas and benefit point assignment as applied to privately owned parcels. This requirement is clearly conveyed in Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution which states in part, "... Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit." Publically owned parcels are categorized and assigned benefit units using the same methodology as privately owned parcels, based on their land use as shown on the latest County Secured Roll. Rate per Benefit Unit The assessment rate per special benefit unit is calculated by dividing the total cost estimate to be assessed by the total special benefit units assigned to the parcels in the District. The following formula provides the assessment rate per special benefit unit calculation: Rate per _ Total Costs to District's Total Benefit Unit be Assessed Benefit Units Method of Assessment Spread The method of assessment is based upon a formula that assigns the special benefits to each parcel, with special benefit points being adjusted by the parcel's number of units or lot size Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 31 • P313 (acreage). The formula below provides a summary of the annual assessment calculation for each parcel in the District. (B) Parcel's Total = Parcel's Total X Parcel Benefit Units Special Benefit Factor Points Parcel(B) s Total Parcel's Parcel's Parcel's Special Benefit Aesthetic + Safety + Economic Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Benefit Points (C) Residential Parcel Factor = Units Parcel Factor Non-Residential Parcel Factor = Acreage Applying the Method of Assessment Spread The maximum assessment for each parcel in the District is calculated by the following procedure: Step 1: Assign each parcel its appropriate land use category based on the most recent San Bernardino County Assessor's Secured Roll data. Step 2: Determine each parcel's appropriate aesthetic benefit points based on land use. The aesthetic benefit points are shown in the following table: Parcel Land Use Category Aesthetic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 1.00 Undeveloped 0.40 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Step 3: Determine each parcel's appropriate safety benefit points based on land use. The safety benefit points are shown in the following table: Parcel Land Use Category Safety Benefit Points Single Family Residential 3.00 Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 32 P314 Condominium Residential 2.10 - Multi-Family Residential 2.10 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels- Church/Fire 2.00 Station/School Undeveloped 0.30 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Step 4: Determine each parcel's appropriate economic benefit points based on land use. The economic benefit points are shown in the following table: • Parcel Land Use Category Economic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 3.20 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels - Church/Fire 0.00 Station/School Undeveloped 1.50 Common Area/Roads/Utility 0.00 Step 5: Sum the aesthetic benefit points, safety benefit points and economic benefit points for each parcel. The total benefit points are shown in the following table: Aesthetic Safety Economic Total Benefit Benefit Benefit Benefit Parcel Land Use Category Points Points Points Points Single Family Residential 4.00 3.00 4.00 11.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 2.10 3.20 8.10 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 2.10 2.80 7.70 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 18.00 18.00 52.00 Public Service Parcels - Church/Fire 1.00 2.00 0.00 3.00 Station/School Undeveloped 0.40 0.30 1.50 2.20 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 • Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 33 P315 Step 6: Determine the appropriate parcel factor based on the parcel's land use. The unit .of measurement for each parcel factor, by land use, is shown in the following table: Residential Parcel Factor = Units Non-Residential Parcel Factor = Acreage Step 7: Multiply the total benefit points by parcel factor to compute each parcel's total special benefit units. Step 8: Sum the result of Step 7 for all parcels in the District. Step 9: Separate the general benefit from the special benefit, and divide the portion of the budget representing special benefit by the result of Step 8 to compute the rate per benefit unit. Step 10: Multiply each parcel's total benefit units by the result of Step 9 to compute each parcel's assessment. Step 11: In future years the rate per benefit unit may be adjusted by inflation. 2015/16 Proposed Maximum Assessment Rates The 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rate is calculated by dividing the net total to be assessed by the total special benefit units assigned to parcels in the District based on property type, unit and acreage data. For Fiscal Year 2015/16, the calculation is as follows: Maximum Assessment Special Benefit / District's Total per Benefit Unit to be Assessed Benefit Units $42.28 = $3,213,658.08 / 76,029.54 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District, by land use category: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment per EBU Actual Assessment per EBU 2013/14 42.01 42.00 2014/15 42.23 42.00 Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 34 P316 2015/16 42.28 42.28 Maximum Allowable Total Benefit Parcel Assessment for FY Parcel Land Use Category Points Factor 2015/16 Single Family Residential 11.00 Unit $464.97 Condominium Residential 8.10 Unit 342.18 Multi-Family Residential 7.70 Unit 325.47 Commercial/Industrial 52.00 Acre 2,198.04 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire 3.00 Acre 126.81 Station/School Undeveloped 2.20 Acre 92.99 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Parcel 0.00 Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year, beginning Fiscal Year 2015/16, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative, the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the • previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI-U adjustment. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that fiscal year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2015/16 will increase from $462.00 to $464.97 per single-family residence, a rate increase of 0.64% as compared to Fiscal Year 2014/15. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 35 P317 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following pages. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. • Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 36 Jea eDsi eSuowe�n o sue Jo A P318 �� 9i/sioz � i � � u a� �—(z awe) TJiJisla aJueualu!ew adepspuei pue s)IJed poogiogq2iaN e!JOP!/\ N N V) Z r i N *.*/ .— 2 0 4. ru m 0 U a ° O } �' ny�(JJayd IT a CC o 63 N a a• ) �1.. , G1 a; ^AV lse3 in .R11 i Ay epueemi3 AV epueM!13 OE V ▪ Q 1, w:03 18 )19aJ3 iced 11 •• AV Jalsay3o8 ny Jalsayoo8 --I I li AV ue3IIII w t l' AV ua)1414w l I Ay uaneH I u U Ay uaneH roe esowJaH my esouuaH 1 i Ay Ple4IlloN Ay Pleglyph/ ny uewllaH 1v,'-ny uewllaH .%? 0 z r •v / ny p eAauA 1S uellauJed J 1/1/11i1/11 I r U m � IiiP1114 iai2l 1r. �• L J — $ .c �...-' Q; Q) r 2 00 w C 03 IL t0 Or Ili; m 111 =41,1 0 V P319 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Actual Total Total Rate for FY Assessment Property Type Units/Acres EBUs 2015/16(1) for 2015/16(2) Single Family 5,859.00 64,449.00 $464.97 per unit $2,724,259.23 Residential Condominium 559.00 4,527.90 $342.18 per unit 191,278.62 Residential Multi-Family 589.00 4,535.30 $325.47 per unit 191,701.83 Residential Commercial/Industrial 42.33 2,200.90 $2,198.04 per acre or 93,043.03 portion thereof Public Service Parcels —Church/Fire 70.27 210.82 $126.81 per acre or 8,910.92 Stattion/School portion thereof Undeveloped 48.01 105.62 $92.99 Per acre or 4,464.44 portion thereof Common Area, Roads, Easements, Utility 0.00 0.00 $0.00 per parcel 0.00 Parcels Total 7,167.61 76,029.54 $3,213,658.08 (1) The actual allowable assessment rates have been rounded down to the nearest dollar. (2) The total 2015/16 assessment amount differs from the District Budget net total to be assessed due to rounding. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Total Total Property Type Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 1089-581-01 05/21/14 TR 18212 67.00 67.00 Condominiums Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 38 P320 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop) P321 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A (HYSSOP) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P322 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P323 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to., be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $3,670.00 Plus Anticipated Interest Earnings 440.00 Total Estimated Revenue $4,110.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 6.930.00 Total Expenditure Budget $11,050.00 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $413.74 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 • P324 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. c%OFESS/CN4 `.4 cre0REWSI# 2 lit No.C053672 9 Exp-640j Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P325 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P326 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P327• PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City South and East of Hyssop Drive south of 6th Street. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site# Descriptive Location J-1 The west side of Hyssop from south of 6th street to the south end of the cul-de-sac. Ground Cover area: 6,050 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ aeaA lepsij P328 9 e2uoweDnp ogDueH JO Alit—VE•oN hulsla aDueualuieW adeDspue-I Z a W w a Z w I- z Z Er oJ 0 } w 1 w c& I g m f ff ON III O Q 1 el a) 1- - ! - � .� o 4, Ei---- _ , . Q)— -� 2fd d0 N o M� S l l dedr,$j r CD Co L daNO 171 � Q o1 Q O C ;ia pat E a :� . . N i!!!v: :F€Y42y'.i. 2 c°.5 -505.ZeF::i; f" oa°g°T1,;21's§€a: 0 Z M ES1 3Ei • A. ' Zt 112 'gs e ��. C.) .itt.ti:t0g4.21t3i1'4 P329 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 1,100.00 Contract Services 7,500.00 Utilities Water Utilities 1,460.00 Electric Utilities 840.00 Assessment Administration 50.00 General Overhead 100.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 11,050.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay —Vehicles $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 11,050.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 3,670.00 Plus Anticipated Interest Earnings 440.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 4,110.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 6.930.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 11,040.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 3,723.66 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 413.74 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P33O balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 39,723.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (6,930.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 32,793.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P331 Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. • Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P332 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P333 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P334 When the District was formed in 1979, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Non-Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Rate per EBU Non-Residential $413.74 $413.74 9 9 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P335 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P336 9T/STOZ eeaA lns!d tit e8uowe3nD oypuea;o Alp—y£•oN p!J;s!a aDueua;u!ew adeDspue1 CE 41 M in lad E a ,F IN � ) i ; , , JLI1 W O tog Q i ny epuer�!1] I ny epuern!1� Q I \\--, I CO i i I9 peep Aea ,_..�.Ay Jalsayooa I r CO I i ny Jeisayaoa I ny uaVII!w r--------"— ! A ua>l!II!w I if 1 1 1 I 1 ny uaneH I I I ny uaneH I i ny esowaaH I 1 y 1 nesowieH I ^d Pleq!y �d o I I Ay Pleq!yoJd e I ny uewpaH I N ny uewllaH I I I ny pieAau!n IS uellawe3 I ..,....•""? , ' III; tql .._. , � Y.._.._�_.._.._r 0 l iii !y if ! r''� ny ono.) sgg 071. ii- 6 Iiiiils!:41 -o Ce c 03 U- cn o °o Q JjiIi$ 73 c . (7) a( iilitiliiiii! (eV? iiiilliirii WeetliAle P337 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $413.74 9 9 $3,723.66 "Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. • Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P338 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) P339 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P34O TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 10 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 13 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 16 Assessment Roll 18 Assessment Roll Annexations P341 • ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 1,026,940.00 Metrolink Parking Permit Revenues 240,000.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 17,380.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 1,284,320.00 Plus Use Operating Reserve Fund 578,470.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 1,862,790.00 Total District EBU Count 2,910.83 • Actual Assessment per EBU $ 352.80 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 352.80 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P342 parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. rOFESsra 9NOREWS eey TFG F No.C053672 m Exp.6;3o• 1 I OF GO% Mark A. Steuer, Director o Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P343 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No.38—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P344 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P345 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the commercial and industrial area of the City which is generally bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the north, 4th Street on the South, East Avenue on the east and Grove Avenue on the west. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, Metrolink, and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site# Descriptive Location J-2 The monument at the northeast corner of Haven and 4th Street. Ground Cover area: 5,715 square feet Hardscape area: 6,068 square feet J-3 The 6th Street median from Milliken to Pittsburg. Ground Cover area: 3,300 square feet J-4 The entry monuments on the east and west side of 4th and Milliken. Ground Cover area: 19,771 square feet Hardscape area: 9,060 square feet J-5 The Milliken median from Arrow to Jersey. Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P346 Ground Cover area: 10,220 square feet J-6 The Spruce median from Foothill to White Oak. Ground Cover area: 4.300 square feet J-7 The 6th Street median from Pittsburg to Richmond. Ground Cover area: 5,114 square feet J-8 The 6th Street median from Richmond to Buffalo. Ground Cover area: 2,476 square feet J-9 The Milliken railroad underpass. Ground Cover area: 165,633 square feet, 12-12-01 added 5199 sq feet Turf area: • 4,897 square feet J-10 The 6th Street median from Cleveland to 1,820 feet east of Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 13,310 square feet J-11 The 6`h Street median from Buffalo to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 12,400 square feet J-12 The Milliken median from Arrow to Century. Ground Cover area: 13,855 square feet J-13 The Milliken median from Century to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 3,330 square feet J-14 The 6th Street median from Utica to Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 8,559 square feet J-15 The 6th Street median from Haven to Utica. Ground Cover area: 7,680 square feet J-16 Day creek median from Church to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 8,466 square feet J-17 The Day Creek medians south of Foothill including the traffic circle. Ground Cover area: 6,490 square feet H-1 The Haven median from 4th Street to 6th Street. Ground Cover area: 21,205 square feet 3/25/13: Converted 8,935 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13 Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P347 H-2 The Haven medians from 6th Street to the underpass bridge. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven from Acacia Street to underpass bridge. Ground Cover area: 54,720 square feet 3/25/13: Converted 2,960 sqft of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13 H-3 The Haven medians from underpass bridge to Arrow Route. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven from the underpass bridge to Jersey Blvd. Ground Cover area: 56,210 square feet H-4 The Haven median from Arrow Route to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 15,156 square feet H-5 The Haven median from Foothill to Church. Ground Cover area: 11,502 square feet FH-1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-3 The Foothill median from 790 feet west of Market Place to Market Place. Ground Cover area: 4,434 square feet FH-4 The Foothill median from Market Place to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 10,392 square feet FH-5 The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr. to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-6 The Foothill median from Masi Plaza to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-7 The Foothill boulevard median from Vineyard to Orchard Plaza. Ground Cover area: 2,605 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P348 FH-8 The Foothill boulevard median from Orchard Plaza to Lion Street. Ground Cover area: 344 square feet FH-9 The Foothill boulevard median from Hellman to Malachite and from Malachite to Archibald. Ground Cover area: 21,474 square feet FH-10 The Foothill boulevard median from Archibald to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet FH-11 The Foothill boulevard median from Ramona to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 5,210 square feet FH-12 The Foothill boulevard median from Hermosa to Center. Ground Cover area: 6,329 square feet FH-13 The Foothill boulevard median from Center to Haven. Ground Cover area: 6,286 square feet FH-14 The Foothill boulevard median from Rochester to 600 feet east of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 1,356 square feet Site reduced to 5,979 square feet due to median renovation. FH-15 The Foothill boulevard median from 1,225 feet west of Day Creek to Day Creek. Ground Cover area: 4,905 square feet FH-16 The Foothill boulevard median from Day Creek to the 15 freeway. Ground Cover area: 9,808 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9I/STOZ Jea/,le3slj P349 6 e2uoweDnD opuea;o MIS-8£'ON 13p1sIp aDueualuieb4J ade3spuel ', i FF W 2 41210201131111 cc z 1— I $si:i P a. w 7, v i4:111 W w 1142:11=5;134 y'.3 ` !' I 2 U € x°° 25g1° §3:^F3 co K 3 K a C FF_ F SS I 16 $ §Fi¢sSb�}gdl Fo II m c F°sgi5sl gel#aeiei L 1 $ 1 LL PP = u�u�n n�umnm•rtllse3 u on 3i o i ^tl eWe^P43 ow eWe^W3 CO ri�a�• in 0 �' Z ° 1 • r, 1 II �.. u�e II te fl. nV,elea400u II - `� 9I•I Uri 1 QU O9 11 V,eiSOWOa GI w n v c I. 1 C d I II _ ntl ueM!II!W IQ „In,. 1r t ..,;4 n vat > ....'46., it II C 0 ! .•• n — Q I • CLCO tlntl uaneH I V uaneH y n esow.a 1 v esow.ay{ 13 1 0 C i 1 II J AV mea!wro i tt v plea!wro i N %, i Nk. a• AV uewllaH! ^% ¢ .✓ ntl uewllaH P ! S@� li to b Y 1 ` III i ttS S P ' II a +P�' Mtl P.eRauiq I IS uellawe0l �i �� i t._ f a 4• romnasi 4... �iiso = 0 Cx to S 2 b r x1/47.•• • .�Z/o ••�u.••.•..3.......rr•• c• '4 J .Wr�I d a V m ri P350 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 53,480.00 Overtime Salaries 0.00 Part-time Salaries 11,600.00 Fringe Benefits 26,860.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 91,940.00 Operations and Maintenance Computer Software $ 500.00 Operations and Maintenance 11,100.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilities 6,000.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 0.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 498,830.00 Contract Services/Facilities 112,000.00 Tree Maintenance 22,290.00 Telephone Utilities 600.00 Water Utilities 130,960.00 Electric Utilities 59,390.00 Assessment Administration 6,270.00 General Overhead 21.070.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 869,010.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay-Equipment $ 200,000.00 Capital Projects $ 665,000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 865,000.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 1,825,950.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 1,026,940.00 Plus Metrolink Parking Permit Revenues 240,000.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 17.380.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 1,284,320.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 578,470.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 1,862,790.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 1,026,940.82 Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P351 Total District EBU Count 2,910.83 Actual Assessment per EBU —Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 352.80 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 352.80 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall • not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 1,065,867.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (578,790.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 487,077.00_ Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11. Fiscal Year 2015/16 P352 Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P353 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied • according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P354 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P355 When the District was formed in 1979, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units IProperty Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Non-Residential 1.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Rate per EBU Non-Residential $352.80 $352.80 2,910.83 2,910.83 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P356 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9I/SZOZ JeaA leDs!J P357 LI e2uoweDnD OlpUeb 40 AJiD—9E"oN 131J1s!a aDueua;u!ew adeDspuei CO M t� 'L CO J M r qN I�; U O w` ` { t\ Ad AJJayO 0) CL (i) isme.m. NI. . CC up y N • J m a O t lea I I m G 2 .� ! I. u_ < le I � Ay►sea in Tr !Ay epuenn!�3 Ay epuenA!l3 I 0 i y i8 )IaaJO Aed C Ay Ja;sayooa ny Jaisayooa ...I �..J , Ay ua)l!II!W r._.._.._..-.._._ Ay ual!II!W Ay uaneH Ay uaneH AV esowJaH ; ny esowie- AV Pleq!4oJy Ay Pleq!4oiy ny uewllaH N Ay uewlleH co s w v p eA Ay au!n is ue!IauJe3 1111112 1T v ill!fzi Rb,,, Er Ay aAOJ� :f ''`i= eg ( _ CI) m ii N it 1 lea-fii _ �f1 J t O 00 ilg b v N O Q sfr €hill co ill cu ›, Wilifillt V) al 17$1, ant i � 1€ 31° I 1 iV 1. 1148- ili/di ili! P358 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Maximum Property Type Allowable Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Units/Acres EBUs Assessment per EBU Non-Residential $352.80 2,910.83 2,910.83 $1,026,940.82 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal'Year. APN Annexation Project Name Total Total Property Type Date Units/Acres EBUS 0229-262-01, 05/21/14 DRC2008- 5.53 5.53 Non-Residential 31 00185 0229-131-04, 05/21/14 PM 19448 74.75 74.75 Non-Residential 17 & 25 0229-171-01 11/19/14 DRC2012- 4.77 4.77 Non-Residential 00878 Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P359 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) P360 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4-R (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P361 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 10 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 13 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 17 Assessment Roll 19 Assessment Roll Annexations P362 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 2,823,880.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 19.460.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 2,843,340.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 14,150.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 2,857,490.00 Total District EBU Count 6,917.72 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 408.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 408.21 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P363 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the o.der of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. , FOFESS/ 04 , ac Q 0DRE s No.C0556 x.6,40.1 r C / Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P364 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P365 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or.upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P366 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue, east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road and includes the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines; ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park The street trees within the residential parkways and tree maintenance easements to be maintained by the District are on the following streets, located within the boundaries of the District: Amiata Dr Clarisa PI Danner Ct Bastia Ct Corsica Ct De Anza Dr Blackhorse Ct (Countryview to Milliken) Derby PI Brandywine PI Countryview Downing Ct Bunkerhill Dr (Mt. View to Palacio) Ellena Wy Cedarbrook PI Covington PI (s/o Terra Vista to Chesterton Dr Danbury Dr Fitzpatrick) Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P367 Emery PI Potomac Ct Terra Vista Pky Fitzpatrick Dr Radcliff PI (Church to Brandywine) Fulbourn Ct Regent Dr Wellington PI Hinton Ct Rockingham Ct Yorktown Ct Linaro Rd Saranza PI Meyers Dr Southhampton Ct The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location TV-1 The Base Line median from Haven to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 16,613 square feet Turf area: 19,030 square feet Hardscape area: 10,630 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 2,769 square feet of ground cover area and 1,478 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City; however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. TV-2 The Base Line median from Spruce to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 13,504 square feet Turf area: 16,109 square feet Hardscape area: 12,575 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 2,749 square feet of ground cover area and 1,598 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City; however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. TV-3 The Base Line median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 8,418 square feet Turf area: 13,573 square feet Hardscape area: 16,567 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 5,247 square feet of ground cover area and 4,289 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City; however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. TV-4 The south side of Base Line from 800 feet east of Spruce to Milliken. The cul-de-sac at the north end of Cascade. Ground Cover area: 9,278 square feet Turf Cover area: 12,659 square feet Hardscape area: 7,950 square feet TV-5 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Belpine to 112 feet west of Butterfield; Terra Vista Parkway median from Spruce to Milliken and the south side of Terra Vista Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P368 Parkway from 164 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 13,411 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 12,978 square feet TV-6 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Spruce to 175 feet north of countryside and Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 17,991 square feet Turf area: 11,413 square feet Hardscape area: 11,452 square feet TV-7 The north side of Church from the west side of Deer Creek Channel to Terra Vista Parkway. The west side of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to 175 feet north of Countryside. Ground Cover area: 9,924 square feet Turf area: 5,378 square feet Hardscape area: 6,426 square feet TV-8 The southeast corner of Church and Haven; the Church median from Haven to Terra Vista Parkway and the wash end on the Northwest corner of the Deer Creek Channel and Church. Ground Cover area: 26,876 square feet Hardscape area: 2,306 square feet Hardscape area: 2,788 square feet TV-9 The Church median from Terra Vista Parkway to Spruce Avenue. Ground Cover area: 7,829 square feet Hardscape area: 6,605 square feet TV-10 The east side of Valencia from Base Line to the pre-school; the south side of Augusta from Valencia to Meadow Lark and the west side of Summerfield from Valencia to Evergreen. Ground Cover area: 20,818 square feet Turf area: 18,634 square feet Hardscape area: 8,666 square feet TV-11 The paseo at Parkside and Clover from Parkside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,795 square feet Hardscape area: 1,049 square feet TV-12 The east side of Haven from the pre-school to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,170 square feet Turf area: 2,091 square feet Hardscape area: 1,060 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P369 TV-13 The east side of Spruce from Elm to Mountain View; the north and south sides of Norfolk from Spruce to Cardiff; the south side of Mountain View from Spruce to 290 feet east of Belvedere and the paseo from Spruce to Countryview. Ground Cover area: 8,459 square feet Turf area: 3,355 square feet Hardscape area: 8,886 square feet TV-14 The south side of Mountain View from 290 feet east of Belvedere to 590 feet east of Fairhaven; the paseo south of Mountain View between Belvedere and Fairhaven to Country View and from Countryview Drive to West Greenway Corridor. • Ground Cover area: 19,030 square feet Turf area: 8,430 square feet Hardscape area: 9,262 square feet TV-15 The north side of Mountain View from 634 feet west of Biarritz to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet Turf area: 4,738 square feet Hardscape area: 5,104 square feet TV-16 The west Greenway Corridor from the northeast corner of Elm and Spruce to West Greenway. • Ground Cover area: 15,529 square feet Turf area: 20,884 square feet Hardscape area: 20,626 square feet TV-17 The west side of Milliken from 585 feet north of Mountain View to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 5,835 square feet Turf area: 3,564 square feet Hardscape area: 2,340 square feet TV-18 The south side of Mountain View from approximately 250 feet west of Claridge to Terra Vista Parkway. The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 18,316 square feet Turf area: 5,944 square feet Hardscape area: 23,800 square feet TV-19 The Terra Vista Parkway median from Milliken to Mountain View. The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from 68 feet north of Addison to Mountain View. The west side of Mountain View from Grapevine to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 20,306 square feet Turf area: 3,886 square feet Hardscape area: 11,478 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P370 TV-20 The Church median from Milliken to 675 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 2,860 square feet Hardscape area: 2,112 square feet TV-21 The Church median from Milliken to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 16,811 square feet Turf area: 335 square feet Hardscape area: 14,880 square feet TV-22 The Milliken median from Mountain View to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 16,436 square feet Hardscape area: 16,267 square feet TV-23 The Milliken underpass from West Greenway Park to Milliken Park. Ground Cover area: 19,271 square feet Turf area: 22,139 square feet Hardscape area: 18,119 square feet TV-24 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 600 feet north of Creekbridge; the north side of Creekbridge from Brookside to Haven and the paseo from Creekbridge and Brookside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 5,851 square feet Turf area: 9,965 square feet Hardscape area: 4,351 square feet TV-25 The east side of Haven form 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 410 feet south of Creekbridge. Ground Cover area: 3,319 square feet Turf area: 1,677 square feet Hardscape area: 1,779 square feet TV-26 The paseo at Plymouth south of Essex from Plymouth to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,956 square feet Hardscape area: 2,385 square feet • TV-27 The paseo from Terra Vista Parkway to Windsong and from Windsong to Plymouth. Ground Cover area: 2,270 square feet Turf area: 2,731 square feet Hardscape area: 3,332 square feet TV-28 The paseo on the north side of 7552 Hardy. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P371 Ground Cover area: 630 square feet Turf area: 733 square feet Hardscape area: 432 square feet TV-29 The East Greenway Corridor from Milliken Park to Terra Vista Parkway, including the turf area at the entrance to Tract 16157. Ground Cover area: 17,780 square feet Turf area: 52,403 square feet Hardscape area: 29,888 square feet TV-30 The Milliken Median from Mountain View to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,890 square feet Hardscape area: 10,260 square feet TV-31 The paseo from Elm to West Greenway Park. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet Hardscape area: 8,900 square feet TV-32 The Greenwich paseo from Greenwich to Muirfield. Ground Cover area: 1,323 square feet Hardscape area: 1,456 square feet TV-33 The south side of Mountain View from 430 feet west of Country View to Country View. Ground Cover area: 3,434 square feet Turf area: 1,853 square feet Hardscape area: 1,720 square feet TV-34 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 390 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 1,342 square feet Turf area: 1,887 square feet Hardscape area: 1,612 square feet TV-35 The Trail Northeast of Ruth Musser School from Terra Vista Parkway to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 9,285 square feet Hardscape area: 5,148 square feet TV-36 The east side of Countryview Dr. from Corsica to Mountain View Drive. The south side of Mountain View Dr. from Countryview Dr. to Milliken. The west side of Milliken from Mountain View Dr. to the West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 9,141 square feet Turf area: 5,895 square feet Hardscape area: 6,058 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P372 TV-37 The north side of Meyers from Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,300 square feet Hardscape area: 1,283 square feet TV-38 The Church median from Rochester to Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to 853 feet north of Church. Ground Cover area: 8,510 square feet Hardscape area: 5,640 square feet TV-39 The north side of Mountain View form 250 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. The east side of Milliken from Mountain View to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 16,751 square feet Hardscape area: 15,716 square feet TV-40 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 11,630 square feet Hardscape area: 19,738 square feet TV-41 The paseo east of Milliken from Terra Vista Parkway south to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 4,081 square feet Hardscape area: 9,640 square feet TV-42 The north side of Mountain View from Terra Vista Parkway to 250 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 10,994 square feet Hardscape area: 14,777 square feet TV-43 Church median and parkway from Malaga to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 7,506 square feet Hardscape area: 3,955 square feet TV-44 The south side of Church from Terra Vista Parkway to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 10,400 square feet Hardscape area: 7,606 square feet TV-45 The west side of Rochester from Church to Malaga. Ground cover area: 20,693 square feet Hardscape area: 12,450 square feet TV-46 The north side of Malaga from Church to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 19,843 square feet Hardscape area: 18,000 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P373 TV-47 The east side of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to Brandywine. The paseo from Brandywine to Bunker Hill Drive. The east side of Radcliff from Bunker to Malaga. Ground Cover area: 17,838 square feet Hardscape area: 9,023 square feet TV-48 The Church median from 750 feet east of Milliken to Malaga Ave. Ground Cover area: 5,554 square feet Hardscape area: 9,698 square feet FH-1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. FH-2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. FH-5 The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. FH-6 The Foothill median form Masi Plaza to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. H-5 The Haven median form Foothill to Church. Ground Cover area: 11,502 square feet 3/25/13: Converted 10,572 sq ft of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 4R. An equal amount is maintained by LMD 3B. H-6 Haven median form Church to Baseline. Ground Cover area: 9,615 square feet 3/25/13: Converted 8,708 sq: ft. of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 4R. An equal amount is maintained by the General Fund. H-7 The Haven median from Baseline to Southern Pacific railroad tracks. Ground Cover area: 3,130 square feet 3/25/13: Converted 3,992 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13. Removed 3,692 sq. ft. of ground cover for turn pocket expansion. Area listed is the 50% Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P374 maintained by LMD 4R. An equal amount is maintained by the General Fund. VG-14 The Baseline median from Milliken to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Baseline and following the curb line to Kenyon. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground Cover area: 9,169 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvements are 80,287, 62,999 square feet for Turf and 44,826 square feet for Hardscape; however, due to the location of the improvements, LMD 4-R maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by LMD 2. VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Baseline. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Rochester to Ellena East. The Baseline Median from Rochester to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Baseline and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 3,960 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvements are 58,5887, 57,306 square feet for Turf and 36,014 square feet for Hardscape; however, due to the location of the improvements, LMD 4-R maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Rochester to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by LMD 2. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ JeaA le3s!J P375 VI eBuoweDn0 oypuelj 4o •oN p!J s!a a3ueualuiew adempuei u Z E L.S1 z - ] AV2i31S3H@02�' O w Uhdflg P. 1 'j�1 � ZJ Y • 1111011 ! III�Ir�`,�,� c LL AN n , N 1114 • v � o 4 C p O O .40 a 6 U) J . u O 410. a AV N3NI11IV N re It ce a Y V O a + _ c3 z c Z J io nl,ucau F3 Ei,r d o g L IF* ‘— yr U Q n � m R e r'*1 pi �1 Jl Z m ` a 3 ?.has ,4 4 4 �II 4 k I r l Z F Ara,..S. /�/ :7511-1i' 124 raj ▪!• !-232E 14.;.“o z o vi 272ttate:t:2-e AV N3AVH 0 P376 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 616,180.00 Overtime Salaries 1,050.00 Part-time Salaries 32,280.00 Fringe Benefits 293,890.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 943,400.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 93,650.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 6,000.00 Emergency Equipment&Vehicle Rental 1,700.00 Equip Operations & Maint 3,750.00 Depreciation—Computer Equip 0.00 Contract Services 684,160.00 Tree Maintenance 71,400.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 3,420.00 Water Utilities 445,910.00 Electric Utilities 32,930.00 Assessment Administration 22,990.00 General Overhead 179.300.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 1,545,210.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay— Equipment 0.00 Capital Outlay—Vehicles 0.00 Capital Outlay— Improvements Other Than Buildings 0.00 Capital Projects $ 392.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 392,000.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 2,880,610.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 2,823,880.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 19,460.00 Total Estimated Revenues $ 2,843,340.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 14,150.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 2,857,490.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 2,823,886.54 Total District EBU Count 6,917.72 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 408.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 408.21 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P377 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the property owners on December 2, 2009, voted in favor of a Prop 218 assessment ballot increase with an allowable annual increase by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 3,138,184.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (37,270.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 3,124,034.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P378 Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P379 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P380 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P381 derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined. On December 2, 2009 Proposition 218 assessment ballot increase was approved by the property owners in this district. Therefore, all parcels included in the District boundary, are being levied in accordance with Article XIII D and Proposition 218. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use}, and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Benefit Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Benefit Unit Condominium 0.80 Benefit Unit Multi-Family 0.70 Benefit Unit Commercial/Industrial 3.25 Acre Vacant (incl. all undeveloped property) 0.25 Acre Schools 0.25 Acre • The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table reflects both the maximum allowable assessment and the actual assessment rates for each year since the formation of the district and the proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 for the District: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment per EBU Actual Assessment per EBU 2010/11 380.00 380.00 2011/12 388.64 380.00 2012/13 396.77 380.00 Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P382 2013/14 405.60 380.00 2014/15 407.81 391.40 2015/16 408.21 408.21 Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $408.21 $408.21 2,652.00 2,652.00 Condominium $408.21 $408.21 1,395.00 1,116.00 Multi-Family $408.21 $408.21 3,641.00 2,548.70 Commercial/Industrial $408.21 $408.21 176.28 572.91 Vacant $408.21 $408.21 77.06 19.26 Schools $408.21 $408.21 35.41 8.85 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2010/11, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2015/16 will increase from $391.40 to $408.21 per single-family residence, a rate increase of 4.29% as compared to Fiscal Year 2014/15. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P383 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ JeaA leosid P384 £Z eOuoweanj oipueli jo A !J— -1 "oN PI(Isla a3Ueuaauietj adeispuei CC co cu 4 ,_ V N *y Q' . J V C..) ! tirg (a — IIIL 1 I ny tinayp C ._, 1 0 r�VP ar _9 i _E- a) 3 m o 0 i u_ < _._.w .. my iSe3 � ILLti v •ny epuerwu3 i " ny epuenni13 (1) i - ca i ■el`:� 114 C :` C.) le aa 3 eCI XI ny ialsayoo?:1 A AV Jalsayaoa Rs r a i 1 I ny uaneH i L ny uaneH I ny esowiak 1 i - _ ny esoWJaH i . ny pieq!yoiy 1 f fly Pieq!yojy i 1 t i I ny uewilaH • u)ny uewllaH ny pJeltawn is ueilaweo • h i ` t1 fie! I let!ritill�� i • r_ D 6 C tt� f.._._: _..r• y }, ny anoa0 gi giiiast i L. ' (n C m & V) i it l i l. t 1 O� L J = 3 w 1$e11b 4 1 0 -2 O 00 3 F � N o Q L s1fl ce C m L C =II,. j ci 0 .i € = j Z$ i; sa ii... !Air !II:ill :III P385 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 actual assessment for the District: Actual Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $408.21 2,652.00 2,652.00 $1,082,572.92 Condominium $408.21 1,395.00 1,116.00 $455,562.36 Multi-Family $408.21 3,641.00 2,548.70 $1,040,404.82 Commercial/Industrial $408.21 176.28 572.91 $233,867.59 Vacant $408.21 77.06 19.26 $7,866.20 School $408.21 35.41 8.85 $3,612.65 TOTALS 7,976.75 6,917.72 $2,823,866.54 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2015/16 - P386 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Andover) P387 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (ANDOVER) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P388 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P389 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Andover) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment • $ 2,460.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies _ 780.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 3,240.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 8.680.00 Total Expenditure Budget • $ 11,920.00 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU • $ 56.65 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU • $ 113.29 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described .in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. S—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P390 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. I�gp,OFESS/04 AS,kJ'DREws'to Z CC p No.C053672 9 Exp.6.30a 7 i • �, / � G --'''V'riN11s_ P/ OFc100% Mark A. Steuer, Director o E • eering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P391 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P392 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P393 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City bounded by Hermosa Avenue on the west, 26"' Avenue on the south, the parcels north of and along Bedford Drive and the parcels west of and along Andover Place. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Andover Tot Lot. Site # Descriptive Location 1-1-5 The Andover playground on the southwest corner of Andover and Bedford. Ground Cover area: 1,506 square feet Turf area: 1,070 square feet Hardscape area: 640 square feet Andover and landscaping are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 91/sloz JeaA lejsij P394 9 eguoweun:)opuea joAlit—s 'oN 13uisia aaueuajuieW adenspuej a _ g m W Z D F- z w w a V J w W zz z � U) c J � Z w (Qj (Qj Y n O G U >Q U Q W W a d I a d o ® i1a go Z o" MV N V Y/ 1 O al -WE O CA �► O � a d o ro LO b o J AVVSOwa3H 6.p-lGeaj:s�li': E �:S.sEf=.eiY33 di2.L U U sea�P gQEt�aE 3��s: - 42.�:Ye s?:aS�SEi£ WU $:�piCgs suEF_ -ifs UESE°`Eafie e. P395 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 1,770.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 830.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 2,600.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 1,400.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 70.00 Contract Services 6,390.00 Utilities Water Utilities 710.00 Electric Utilities 420.00 Assessment Administration 220.00 General Overhead 110.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 9,320.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay— Improvements Other Than Buildings $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 11,920.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 2,460.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency 780.00 Total Estimated Revenues $ 3,240.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 8,680.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 11,920.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 2,492.60 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 56.65 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 113.29 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P396 assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 30,948.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (8,680.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 22,268.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. • Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P397 Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Proiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P398 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P399 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located.within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P400 derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined. On December 2, 2009 Proposition 218 assessment ballot increase was approved by the property owners in this district. Therefore, all parcels included in the District boundary, are being levied in accordance with Article XIII D and Proposition 218. • To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use}, and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier I Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $113.29 $56.65 44 44 • The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P401 The Fiscal Year 2015/16 actual assessment rate will remain at $56.65 per Single Family Residence. The City has reserve funds that are more than sufficient to cover an estimated six months' worth of maintenance and servicing costs for the District. When there are excess funds in the District's reserve account, the excess can be used to lower the annual levy to property owners within the District. The City will continue to annually review the estimated costs and expenses for the District as well as reserve fund levels, in order to determine if future levies can be reduced as well. • Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P402 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ JeaA leDs!j P403 ST eSuowe3nO oLpue jo Alp—S 'oN 13!.i;s!0 aJueua;u!ew adeJspuei t w w ,r, C.) N CZ c I !A\ a (5 -J ,,,,, iiii in C.) Li , Fu) CLI g RI i , N N z .i ID Ca _ it o 1 • m CI 2 j 4) � •_j^y Ise3 v`� � i L Oft i ny epuenn!13 —" ■1 Ay epuennll9 (Q I I \ I V i I Cl) i i 13 i9 >laal° �(ed RI ny Jalsagoo8 i i j ny Jaisayooa P..� I i I AV uaN!II!W if-----"-- I AV uaNiIIiW I .it i i 4 I 1 ny uaneH I i my uaneH i I ny eSOWJaH • I ny esowjaH 1 i Ple ^ q!q i AV i I^y Pleq!yoN ` I ny uewllaH + &ny uewllaH I w I Inv pJeAau!A IS ue!lauJe3 i I i i_er i i I1lI{: { 00 I .._.._ r%-----_-.._.._, Ay anoJ �ilf6: cl ic9 L J CO = v a pi: sfi•nE li .._..�.._ •s. m j € $6 o Q cc 03 _ '/ vii t m Z " tp;j#; C'a Ca { i o co CD ¢! i ie°ii! fill€ hrth ic iiii�0141-r•`. ;;i:Iii sill P404 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $113.29 44 44 $4,984.76 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual (County Use Code) _ per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $56.65 44 44 $2,492.60 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no Annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P405 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) P406 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6-R (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P4O7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 6 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 23 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 26 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 30 Assessment Roll 32 Assessment Roll Annexations P408 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July, 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $470,610.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 16.780.00 • Total Estimated Revenue $487,390.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund _ 26,470.00 Total Expenditure Budget $513,860.00 Total District EBU Count 1,196.98 Actual Assessment per EBU $393.17 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $393.17 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P409 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. rOFESS/04,DREwst m No.C053672 ' al). 7 '° d.\Opep %O��P Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P410 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P411 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest • is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P412 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of the 1-210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, west of Rochester Avenue and east of Milliken Avenue, also known as the Caryn Planned Community. The boundaries also include Tract No. 13835 east of Rochester Avenue and Tracts No. 13748, 13857 & 13858 west of Milliken Avenue. Zone 1 is the area generally located west of Rochester Avenue and east of Milliken Avenue. Zone 2 is the area generally located east of Rochester Avenue and west of Milliken Avenue. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location CC-1 The southside of Banyan St from 1290 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The west side of Milliken & median from Banyan St to 292 south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: • 96,892 square feet Turf area: 17,945 square feet Hardscape area: 13,944 square feet CC-3 The paseo on the west side of Morning PI form Morning PI to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,801 square feet Turf area: 124 square feet Hardscape area: 4,609 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P413 CC-4 The west side of Morning PI, from Banyan St to Starview Pl. The north side of Starview PI, from Morning PI to Star View Ct. Ground Cover area: 14,273 square feet Turf Cover area: 5,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,000 square feet CC-5 Silver Sun paseo from the end of Silver Sun cul-de-sac to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 25,890 square feet Turf area: 12,084 square feet Hardscape area: 1,350 square feet CC-6 The east and west side of Netherlands View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr. The Netherlands View loop paseo from Netherlands View Loop to Mt Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 88,902 square feet Turf area: 676 square feet Hardscape area: 23,650 square feet CC-7 The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Mt. Rainer Ct to Kettle Peak. Ground Cover area: 14,930 square feet Turf area: 6,318 square feet Hardscape area: 12,236 square feet CC-8 The paseo from Hillview Loop to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 42,107 square feet Hardscape area: 22,752 square feet Hardscape area: 4,089 square feet CC-9 The south side of Vintage Dr. from 250 feet west of Hillview Loop to Hillview Loop. The west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr. to Kettle Peak. The west side of Kettle Peak from Hillview Loop to Donner Pass Ct. The east side of Hillview Loop from Kettle Peak to Tioga Peak. Ground Cover area: 47,334 square feet Turf area: 4,954 square feet Hardscape area: 9,088 square feet CC-10 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Butler Peak. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Rainbow Falls Ct. Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 24,603 square feet Hardscape area: 10,760 square feet CC-11 The paseo from Caryn School to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St from the paseo to Rochester Ave. The east and west side of Mt. Baldy Ct from Banyan St to Sierra Crest View Loop. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct. to Woodland Ct. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P414 Ground Cover area: 47,507 square feet Turf area: 7,810 square feet Hardscape area: 7,825 square feet CC-12 The Separation Paseo from Vintage Dr. to Pinnacle Peak. Ground Cover area: 50,325 square feet Turf area: 15,021 square feet Hardscape area: 7,675 square feet CC-13 The east side of Hillview Loop from Tioga Peak Ct to Vintage Dr. The south side of Vintage Dr. from Hillview Loop to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Hillview Loop to Caryn School. The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 26,162 square feet Turf area: 4,508 square feet Hardscape area: 12,928 square feet CC-14 The east side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly to Vintage Dr. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Sierra Crest View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Wilson Ct. The south side of Vintage Dr. from Netherlands View Loop to 330 feet west of Netherlands View Loop. Ground Cover area: 73,250 square feet Turf area: 16,525 square feet Hardscape area: 9,885 square feet CC-15 The south side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly Ct. to Mt. Cambridge Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Cambridge Ct. to Woodland Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct. to Caryn School. The Sierra Crest view Loop paseo from Sierra Crest View Loop to Mt. Sherman Ct. Ground Cover area: 70,990 square feet Turf area: 7,699 square feet Hardscape area: 20,055 square feet CC-16 The south side of Vintage Dr. from Netherlands View Loop to Rochester Ave. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Rochester Ave. to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Wilson Ct. to Mt. Cambridge Ct. The Netherlands View Loop Paseo from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 77,202 square feet Turf area: 3,954 square feet Hardscape area: 18,195 square feet CC-17 The east side of Milliken Ave. from Vintage Dr. to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 13,740 square feet Turf area: 9,088 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P415 Hardscape area: 6,460 square feet CC-18 The north side of Vintage Dr. from Milliken Ave. to Hillview Loop. The south side of Vintage Dr. from 104 feet west of Hillview Loop to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 32,287 square feet Turf area: 3,889 square feet Hardscape area: 11,188 square feet CC-19 The Terrace View Loop paseo from Vintage Dr. to Terrace View Loop. Ground Cover area: 17,469 square feet Turf area: 15,617 square feet Hardscape area: 2,736 square feet CC-20 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Mt. San Antonio Ct. to El Capitan Ct. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Mt. San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 20,627 square feet Hardscape area: 20,017 square feet Hardscape area: 7,888 square feet CC-21 The west side of Rochester from Banyan to 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 31,292 square feet CC-22 The south side of Vintage Dr. from Terrace View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Rainer Ct. Ground Cover area: 11,609 square feet Turf area: 3,763 square feet Hardscape area: 6,524 square feet CC-23 The south side of Banyan from Milliken to Butler Peak PI. The west side of Butler Peak PI. from Banyan St. to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak Pl. to Rainbow Falls Ct. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet Hardscape area: 528 square feet CC-24 The north side of Terrace View Loop from El Capitan Ct. to Butler Peak Pl. The east side of Butler Peak PI. from Terrace View Loop to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St. from Butler Peak PI. to 990 feet east of Butler Peak Pl. Ground Cover area: 14,452 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet CC-26 The east side of Rochester from 210 freeway to Vintage Dr. The north and south side of Vintage from Rochester to Thunder Mountain Ct. The west side of Rochester from 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 35,037 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P416 Hardscape area: 19,779 square feet CC-27 The Milliken median and the west side of Milliken from 292 feet south of Vintage to 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 13,365 square feet Hardscape area: 12,300 square feet CC-28 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to the 210 freeway right-of-way. Ground Cover area: 17,724 square feet Cobble area: 2,387 square feet Hardscape area: 8,197 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P417 9T/SIOZ Jean, leDsi j OT E UOWeDn0 oyDueJ Jo/110- -9 '0N Tp!ils!G aaueualu!ew adeDspue1 I • a_ ZZ in 4 ti w LWL I W Z Z cr w O fx 0 0 C° U O Cu �i�V N31S3H�OZl : 1911 I I O O i ce (c-3 ..... \ o I a v Z U o 8w i u" (-9 1- V N N Q. Q U \ `r°� - V CO C° \ ° :...' z:ist'. ' 8 — co V C ° � U `" ` _ a) U . r 0 � 1. CU E O U, � 1 \ N d ; O � U .4./ t c O \,, U// 5 i CO CP. 1;:uNkftrO4f a I j IF ' CD m O U O U kim.:>a) \ IIMON% <> co o V Q U 0 U c U co O N J N — —AVIN3'N IIIl I W mo 1 O O O ozlm f A L - U c L O m C O O m O U N N- c mm .' /) '_� _ _2 1_ _ 1 • E m . � L-. 1411 /-_, `Q o � uo� f�LUuc� r -'--Y-, I_ t__- - _- , � }- y 1� r _ - 1 - 1 _ - t ! ' a11Q O ] C,a m gt m 3rg �0O r o f mo° mH 3 o 2 ▪ u c c w .. ate a m $_ . m �� 0 3 E `t m a c n U- c" m c m u jilhI1Ihiflilli 3 t E d A m' a U N O . op � ot n H `� -2 . ou ag .E.Ea -8 _ O aU V U a m m C T> T M � p aU - ea ym V u g V o-ga - o 2-E.a t y o= a o m m m� €mo t a'n m, "m« c,e E-1- a, c m E m aU cm § € no iu c in_ ,�._ _ ov 7, .Lmm ' r,Q o� m y« 01 Lm o T y'u m H 10 el r - ,c .8 N U a O N P418 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 11,950.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 5,480.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 17,430.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 16,360.00 Emergency Equipment &Vehicle Rental 200.00 Contract Services 229,690.00 Tree Maintenance 35,700.00 Utilities Water Utilities 175,970.00 Electric Utilities 8,730.00 Assessment Administration 7,020.00 General Overhead 23.840.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 497,510.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Proiects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 514,940.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 470,610.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 16,780.00 Total Estimated Revenues $ 487,390.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 26.470.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 513,860.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 470,616.61 Total District EBU Count 1,196.98 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 393.17 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 393.17 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the property owners on December 2, 2009, voted in favor of a Prop 218 assessment ballot increase with an allowable annual increase by the lesser of 3.0% or the Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P419 percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 174,068.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (26,470.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 147,598.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P42O Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City.of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P421 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and • servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P422 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit • Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P423 derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBU5 based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 EBU's per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. Publicly owned school parcels are also assigned an EBU value of 0.25 EBU's per acre in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements which are provided for the use and benefit of the residential units within the District, and the benefit conferred upon other parcels within the District by the open space and landscaping maintained by the School District on their parcels which might be used by properties within the District under joint use agreements between the School District and the City. There are two benefit zones within the District: Zone 1 and Zone 2. Parcels in Zone 2 are assigned 0.75 EBU per dwelling unit due to the reduction in special benefit they receive as a result of their location relative to the majority of the improvements maintained by the District. Zone 2 parcels are on the far east and west side of the District. Therefore, parcels within Zone 2 do not receive the same special benefit from the improvements due to their proximity, as parcels within Zone lwhich are assigned 1.00 EBU per dwelling unit and are generally located adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential —Zone 1 1.00 Dwelling Unit Single Family Residential —Zone 2 0.75 Dwelling Unit School 0.25 Acre or portion thereof Vacant 0.25 Acre or portion thereof The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P424 Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment per EBU Actual Assessment per EBU 2010/11 366.00 246.97 2011/12 374.32 366.00 2012/13 382.15 373.66 2013/14 390.65 381.96 2014/15 392.78 389.96 2015/16 393.17 393.17 Maximum Actual Property Type Allowable Assessment Rate Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Rate per EBU Single Family Residential -Zone 1 $393.17 $393.17 963.00 963.00 Single Family Residential -Zone 2 $393.17 $393.17 310.00 232.50 School $393.17 $393.17 5.35 1.34 Vacant $393.17 $393.17 0.54 0.14 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2010/11, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.0% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2015/16 will increase from $389.96 to $393.17 per single-family residence Zone 1 and from $292.47 to $294.87 per single family residence Zone 2, a CPI increase of 0.82% as compared to Fiscal Year 2014/15. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R-City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P425 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9L/SIOZ aeaA IeJs!d P426 61 eEuoweDn3 oipuea Jo A;!j—b-9 .ON ppis!Q aDueua;u!e! J adempuei CC N_ cil *ea V N .` o . N o o 4 �y� Ay Al�ayo 0 N N ;x lilt 8 0 _ +i ■�� _m CU I iY ! N (� W m o a 11.+ 1 u. < ._ ; --- iny;se3 � RI i Inv epuenN;3 Ay epuemg3 Q i , ' irk`; y 119Naa�°Aea ) ... gi▪ b Ay ia;sayooi C• ny.1 a;sayoo?:i CO =IA i ny uamIW . . , AV uavIIW s � I I J ilir ny uaneH I - I Ay uaneH i AV esownaH j - Ay esowieH I 4E4 AV pleq!q y I ny plegigojtl I I ny uewllaH ! 1 &ny uewllaH i 1 A pJeAawn ;S ue!laweoIW1qr fsi il Ia I �•• cn �_ m t /8= 112' 16 1 s -1 .t+ 1$8l 1�;1T R i .._.._..+ t. �- UI p - v 16 o Q n. t C m lLz� �y1',c6 a7 >. "lif ;1ik v 12 .t . 4. a=a1s fbi; m IA W111,0 •. i '� fx Iz� $ s P427 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 actual assessment for the District: Actual Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Assessment (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $393.17 963.00 963.00 $378,622.71 —Zone 1 Single Family Residential $393.17 310.00 232.50 $91,412.02 —Zone 2 School $393.17 5.35 1.34 $526.84 Vacant $393.17 0.54 0.14 $55.04 TOTALS $393.17 1,278.89 1,196.973 $470,616.61 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P428 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) P429 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P430 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 12 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 15 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 18 Assessment Roll 20 Assessment Roll Annexations P431 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 911,630.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 33,370.00 Plus Transfer In-Fund 868 50.000.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 995,000.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 2,260.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 997,260.00 Total District EBU Count 2,969.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 307.05 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 307.05 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P432 parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. QQQ% ESSloyq�� O WST y k.." m G 4‘yw iiii,rkrojakj N0.C05367219 Exp.6.30• OF CA��Y 1' Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P433 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of • the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P434 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P435 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by the 210 Freeway on the south, I-15 Freeway on the west, and City limits on the north. Typically, parcels have been annexed to the District as they have been developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the North Etiwanda. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines; ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Etiwanda Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location EN-1 The north side of Wilson from San Sevaine to Ridgeline. The east side of Ridgeline from Wilson to Arcadia Way. • Ground Cover area: 27,325 square feet Turf area: 19,334 square feet Hardscape area: 840 square feet EN-2 The Metropolitan Water District easement on the south side of Crescenta Way from San Marino to Ridgeline Place. Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet Turf area: 41,250 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P436 Hardscape area: 9,000 square feet EN-3 The Wilson Av. median from Wardman Bullock Rd. to San Sevaine Avenue. Ground Cover area: 9,016 square feet Hardscape area: 11,088 square feet EN-4 The Planters on the north side of the drainage easement that is between and parallel to Highland and Arapaho Rd. from Etiwanda Ave east to the end. Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet EN-5 The south side of Wilson Av. from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine Av. to 205 feet east of San Sevaine Avenue. The east side of San Sevaine Av from Wilson Av. to Youngs Canyon Road. Ground Cover area: 45,584 square feet Turf area: 3,527 square feet EN-6 The north side of Wilson from Wardman Bullock Rd. to Ridgeline Place. The west side of Ridgeline PI. from Wilson Av. to 120 feet north of Arcadia Way. Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet Turf area: 15,136 square feet Hardscape area: 1,300 square feet EN-7 The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock from Wilson Av. to 857 feet north of Glendora Court. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood wall will be handled as extra for debris pickup and weed control on an as needed basis. Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet Hardscape area: 31,549 square feet EN-8 The south side of Crescenta Way from Ridgeline Pl. to Crestline Place. Ground Cover area: 50,035 square feet Turf area: 35,960 square feet Hardscape area: 10,000 square feet EN-9 The paseo from Meadow Brook to Rock Creek Road. Ground Cover area: 1,400 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 2,820 square feet EN-10 The paseo from Etiwanda to Pacific Crest Place. The west side of Etiwanda from 175 feet north of North Rim Way to 171 feet south of Golden Prairie Drive. Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet Turf area: 4,445 square feet Hardscape area: 13,026 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P437 EN-11 The paseo south of Ridge Crest Drive to southern boundary of Tract 14139. This site is temporarily maintained by another contractor and was deleted from the contract as of 7-16-01 however this site is still the city's property. Ground Cover area: 3,548 square feet Turf area: 800 square feet Hardscape area: 4,280 square feet EN-12 The cul-de-sac on the north side of Ridgecrest PI. at Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,870 square feet Turf area: 700 square feet Hardscape area: 450 square feet EN-13 The north side of Wilson Av. from 574 feet west of Cherry Av. to the channel east of San Sevaine Road. The Wilson Av. median from Cherry Av. to San Sevaine Road. The east side of San Sevaine from Wilson to 136 feet north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 46,611 square feet Turf area: 5,037 square feet EN-14 The west side of San Sevaine Av. from 150 feet north of Wilson to 136 feet north of Crescenta Way. Ground Cover area: 55,166 square feet Turf area: 235 square feet Hardscape area: 6,975 square feet EN-15 The north side of Youngs Canyon Road from 500 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The south side of Youngs Canyon Road from 349 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The east and west side of Koch place from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet north of Youngs Canyon Road. The west side of Koch from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road. The east side of Koch from 82 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road to Youngs Canyon Road. The trailhead north east of the east end of Youngs Canyon Road to the south end of San Sevaine Horse Trail. The south end of San Sevaine Horse from the trail head to 254 feet north of trailhead. Ground Cover area: 42,925 square feet Hardscape area: 14,308 square feet EN-16 The east side of Wardman Bullock from 225 feet south of San Segundo Drive to 80 feet north of Dona Way. Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet • Hardscape area: 3,450 square feet EN-17 The north side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to Guidera Drive. The south side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to 400 feet north of Guidera Drive. The north side of Aggazzotti from Colonbero to 4 75 feet east of Colonbero. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained by city personnel. Ground Cover area: 43,241 square feet Hardscape area: 29,125 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P438 EN-18 The north side of Aggazzotti Road from San Antonio Drive to San Sevaine Road. The west side of San Sevaine road from Aggazzotti to 702 feet south of Aggazzotti. The East side of San Sevaine Road from 702 feet south of Aggazzotti to Regina. Ground Cover area: 47,823 square feet Hardscape area: 30,986 square feet EN-19 The south side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet Hardscape area: 19,229 square feet EN-20 The south side of Wilson Avenue form Bluegrass Avenue to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 85,155 square feet Hardscape area: 48,784 square feet EN-21 The north side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Wilson median from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Westside of Etiwanda from Wilson to Del Norte Place. Ground Cover area: 88,795 square feet Hardscape area: 27,128 square feet EN-22 The north and south side of Vintage from 165 feet east of Country View to 338 feet west of Country View. Ground Cover area: 13,603 square feet Hardscape area: 7,365 square feet EN-23 The north side of Wilson and median from Etiwanda west to Etiwanda. The east side of Etiwanda from Wilson to 1150 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet Hardscape area: 29,567 square feet EN-24 The north side of Vintage from 360 feet west of Ascot to 230 feet east of Countrywood. The south side of Vintage from Ascot PI. to 500 feet east of Countrywood. Ground Cover area: 34,707 square feet Hardscape area: 92,600 square feet EN-25 The east side of Bluegrass from Banyan to 610 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,054 square feet Hardscape area: 5,819 square feet EN-26 The south side of Banyan from Bluegrass to Greenwood. Ground Cover area: 6,240 square feet Hardscape area: 3,200 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P439 EN-27 The south side of Banyan from Laurel Blossom to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 1,703 square feet Hardscape area: 8,417 square feet EN-28 The north side of Wilson from Cervantes to 1715 feet west of Cervantes. The west side of Cervantes from Carmel Knolls Drive to Wilson. The paseo from Wilson to Tejas Ct. The median on Wilson from Cervantes to Bluegrass. The following temporary landscape: There is 1 planter on the west side of Altura at Tejas. There are five planters on the south side of Tejas from Altura to 195 feet east of Altura. Ground Cover area: 25,048 square feet Hardscape area: 22,532 square feet EN-29 The south side of Banyan from 787 feet west of East Av. to East Av. The west side of East Avenue from Banyan to 600 feet south of Blue Gum. The east side of East Ave. from Banyan to 537 feet south of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 16,111 square feet Hardscape area: 15,774 square feet EN-30 The east side of Bluegrass Ave from 257 feet south of Churchill Drive to 418 feet north of Churchill Drive. Ground Cover area: 9,303 square feet Hardscape area: 5,302 square feet EN-31 The south side of Banyan Ave. from 375 feet south of Cashew Way to Rose Way. The north side of Banyan Ave. from 435 feet west of Peak PI. to Wardman Bullock Rd. Ground Cover area: 53,000 square feet Hardscape area: 26,855 square feet EN-32 The landscaping south of the equestrian trail from 210 feet west of Grovewood PI. to 1,170 feet east of Grovewood PI. Ground Cover area: 6,900 square feet EN-33 The north side of Youngs Canyon Rd. from 600 feet east of Banyan Ave. to Banyan Ave. The east side of Ward man Bullock Rd. from Banyan Ave. to Wilson Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave. from Wardman Bullock Rd. to 635 feet east of Fields PI. Ground Cover area: 66,601 square feet Hardscape area: 46,332 square feet EN-34 The west side of Wardman Bullock Rd. from Wilson Ave. to Banyan Ave. Parkview Way from Wardman Bullock Rd. to Soledad Way. Ground Cover area: 56,314 square feet Hardscape area: 28,428 square feet EN-35 The north side of Day Creek Blvd. from Etiwanda Ave. to Indian Wells Place. Ground Cover area: 160,737 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P440 Hardscape area: 128,254 square feet EN-36 The south side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Day Creek to 170 feet north of North Rim. The west side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Indian Wells. Ground Cover area: 58,398 square feet Hardscape area: 68,127 square feet EN-37 The east side of East Ave. from 235 feet south of Hunt Club Dr. to 375 feet north of Hunt Club Dr. Ground Cover area: 5,559 square feet Hardscape area: 5,231 square feet EN-38 The west side of East Ave. from 236 feet north of Philly Dr. to 245 feet south of Philly Dr. Ground Cover area: 4,605 square feet Hardscape area: 3,394 square feet EN-39 The south side of Banyan form Golden Lock Pl. to Raindrop PI. Ground Cover area: 6,024 square feet Hardscape area: 330 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P441 9T/STOZ-mail leos!d TT eSuoweon0 oyouea 40 AT!]—L •oN Tou;sid aoueualuiew adespuel Z .1; ( O/%.A. a CZ- ri w w z Q `44. 2 It -I � N a J 6 s to CC a 55 a re ; w � � K w 0 it (9 O Q w K w a w g K a CO a 3 a a a \s Io ® IITN -r --- -- — -- --- --- - \ N \ . ,. '. ,_ E w ` O _t - w . 1%. • . ,i,, . _ Ilic1' ' if 1. i :�i '4 INIII: IUaY Z IN 11 L _ WS j,'.'• Z0lF{rgy]. -�`4A,'({5,♦♦ 4Cq 3{IP. �y®' /' ,T�w`{�f�jQ�q\J1 j� : CH ..E�.i'?'f W:.'Zw l.2/ w�(, ( "�[IRfi--- --iL r-HHH as;ooiinle NVwoavM img �,: -z ,"'IttILL.^^^..���/�. _ _ ill/b`\/� 2 1 lliftl V 4% /IMO I \.\\ yy OIN.i _I TIa O .. Lo IJ Z� -lip • I g�_p._::' O yeas > m g a y _ _ -6�o a �.— nvlsv3:�a �. rn 1 r z r • u' i_'_ o ito 04 1 a ��` ..y.Z N lip s i i — H-2 w 1 i 1f111E2- . _ t—_ __. N�� Iii ;i;ipo Ma a. AV VONVM1134, AV VONVMI13- AV VONVMII3 1 W ..J ;.�♦iii,•.' t �,r.� ,�1 11�4 !,�— r i1�iL° op st4.la r• .;, 1 z. .. mo ip BY - i s •♦ r4 air . e.,n ••F% r�0�.1�1. m�, w_ ` qe'_� • • y a +,1 1111 nw 'It I_ 4 'a.i %6 tFi Sin Z T. rt.So s' �'��:...s:4 1 w �Onq®w .pip-L\ gy 1�• a \/ 111■ ♦ 7 ® 'm3 n qi a emu of pa. k �.•• E • .nn}: N b0 �H sr �[ �' . .♦ .'-:i :. i I t V. - .I as pm 1=e'a 1. O.1' It F: .I s;-':ill- e! rite" 0. :� N. _ S . L-1V�I l.1L La _. ♦ mx'u... - l=as=F2:S°: ■ ``C`0s. .. \ itI-1III w�� a �d I Z a°i--61 a;-.a--s°'as 1 Ea, m m P442 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 117,680.00 Part-time Salaries 13,160.00 Fringe Benefits 57.120.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 187,960.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 33,400.00 Operations and Maintenance Facilities 1,000.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Emergency Equipment & Vehicle Rental 0.00 Contract Services 297,940.00 Tree Maintenance 7,090.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,310.00 Water Utilities 351,220.00 Electric Utilities 32,130.00 Assessment Administration 15,430.00 General Overhead 72.200.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 811,720.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay— Equipment $ 0.00 Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 999,680.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 911,630.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 33,370.00 Plus Transfer In-Fund 868 50.000.00 Total Estimated Revenues $ 995,000.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 2,260.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 997,260.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 911,631.45 Total District EBU Count 2,969.00 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 307.05 Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P443 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 1 $ 307.05 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 696,554.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (2,260.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 694,294.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P444 Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P445 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement' (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P446 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P447 derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1989, Article XIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwellin Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $307.05 $307.05 2,969 2,969 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. .Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P448 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P449 91/sToz JeaA le:)s!j 61 eSuowean0 oyaueb;o AS!J—L 'ON PuisIG aaueuaauiew adeaspuel, is V .� w $ N AV Aiiayp Qpi� raj o � m � c w o 3 .� co 8 ? L a ® �..��AV ISe3 io Q AV ePuem13 V Ae(03 AV iaisayaoa - J AV Jelseyooa AV uaMgl!W ( AV uaI!II!W AV uanet{ �AV ueneH AV esowiaH AV esowiaH AV PleQ!43JV '' AV Ple4!43JV AV uewlIGH N AV uewllaH y t r a rAV eAeuln IS uellaweo pi t{si AV GAME)= J O ay °it�pti i� LL 7 r6 rir, it tit P450 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code per El U Units/Acres I EBUs I Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 1 2,969 1 2,9691 $911,631.45 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexation is effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Total Total Property Type Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 0226-081-06 02/05/14 TR 18741 53.00 53.00 Single Family Residential 0225-191-03, 04/16/14 TR 18122 76.00 76.00 Single Family 04, 13, 15 & 20 Residential 0225-381-06 11/05/14 TR 18034 7.00 7.00 Single Family Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P451 Preliminary Annual Engineering Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P452 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P453 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 8 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 11 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 14 Assessment Roll 16 Assessment Roll Annexations P454 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015116 Total Estimated Assessment $ 32,740.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 670.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 33,410.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 9,200.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 42,610.00 Total District EBU Count 216.22 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 151.45 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 . Fiscal Year 2015/16 P455 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report t and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Q�,OFESSIO,yA� hQ��PapkEWSjFFyc� y R to w � No.�05's672� 9 5.3J�. 7 a nr FOQ u Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P456 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. S—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P457 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P458 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as South Etiwanda, which is south of the 1-210 Freeway along Fisher Drive, east of East Avenue, including the south side of Highstone Manor Court, the south side of Smokestone Street, and to the San Bernardino County Flood Control drainage basin on east side. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have been developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site# Descriptive Location SE-1 The east side of East Ave. from 480 feet south of Catalpa St. to 182 feet north of Catalpa St. The north and south side of Catalpa St. from East Ave. to Brownstone PI. The west side of Brownstone PI. from Catalpa St. to 150 feet south of Catalpa St. Not including the frontage parkway at 6649 East Ave.. Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet Turf area: 6,258 square feet Hardscape area: 4,050 square feet SE-2 The south side of Fisher Dr. from 361 feet east of East Ave. to 210 feet east of Starstone PI. Ground Cover area: 9,366 square feet Hardscape area: 4,074 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P459 SE-3 The south side of Fisher Dr. from 860 feet west of Mulberry St. to Mulberry St. Ground Cover area: 3,676 square feet Hardscape area: 6,910 square feet Total Ground Cover: 23,397 square feet Total Turf: 6,258 square feet Total Hardscape: 15,034 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. With a Majority Protest for the Proposition 218 Ballot Initiative in September 2010 the city stopped maintaining the north side of Fisher Avenue and reduced the service level to a B. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 91zg2•ERA, , P 6 z _e:)n, 043 ug @ 4,-a ' __ReA kmpm CL E ) § k § ) § { § 0 ( » / § \ d � d ) \ L § � � � LL « ' | ( 101 | / � c % d t \ to 2J � k $ } 2 § - & o & © - & � � Q to _ \ , ! r a h| £ � � ] » lq | ) «ISV, . ) / ,P461 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budqet Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $ 3,840.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 1.740.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 5,580.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 2,600.00 Emergency Equipment &Vehicle Rental 0.00 Contract Services 12,050.00 Tree Maintenance 4,300.00 Utilities Water Utilities 9,870.00 Electric Utilities 1,370.00 Assessment Administration 1,050.00 General Overhead 6.170.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 37,410.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Proiects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 42,990.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 32,740.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 670.00 Total Estimated Revenues $ 33,410.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 9,200.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 42,610.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 32,746.51 Total District EBU Count 216.22 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 1 $ 151.45 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1989/90, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P462 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the.estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 58,803.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (9,200.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 49,603.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P463 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P464 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement' (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P465 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit Landscape Maintenance District No. S—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P466 derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre or portion thereof Church 1.00 Acre or portion thereof The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $151.45 $151.45 188.00 188.00 Non-Residential $151.45 $151.45 13.61 27.22 Church $151.45 $151.45 1.00 1.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P467 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/sTOZ JeaA leis!j P468 sT e2uowe:)n3 oyouea jo Al!:)—g 'ON hu{s!Q a:)ueuaju!ew adeaspuel 00 �_' V •- NN E J CO O Q \ C Nt ! yo a) n d AIJa J 1 o d N C 1 y m O r 3 0 ----:.._.a.._.._. j A �ndlse3 � i ny epuenn!{3 — i ny epuennp3 V 1e Haajo Aecl _ I ny Jalsayooa J i �i ny Jalsayooa 1 ny uaN!II!W r—**........ ny uaH!II!W i I 1 1 1 I ny uaneH 1 I j jny uaneH I i ny esowaH ny esowlaH 1 ny PIe9!4ajb' j ny pley!yajb' I � � ny uewllaH i N ny uewllaH I � � ny pieAau!n IS uegaweo i I• ..•�'� i �ii�iii t�gi ny anoJE) 05 FO E Fo 'ff fill. � �• 1�lGti{3�'F 4 m t11ik• .� ;i I "e .cla . P469 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 188.00 188.00 $28,472.60 Non-Residential $151.45 13.61 27.22 4,122.46 Church $151.45 1.00 1.00 151.45 TOTALS 1 1 202.61 1 216.22 1 $32,746.51 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P470 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) P471 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P472 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 9 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 12 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 16 Assessment Roll 18 Assessment Roll Annexations P473 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 171,960.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 27.090.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 199,050.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 393.480.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 592,530.00 Total District EBU Count 2,149.56 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 80.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 542.15 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P474 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Q�pFESS10NA� =�Q�� �OREWSl`GFy�2 m W NO.C05s672 9 E%p.63o-1'7 Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P475 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P476 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P477 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Lower Etiwanda, which is south of Victoria Street, north of Foothill Boulevard, generally east of Etiwanda Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway and west of East Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Garcia Park (formerly known as South Etiwanda Park). Site # Descriptive Location 9-1 The west side of East Ave. from 380 feet north of Chateau to 290 feet south of Chateau. Ground Cover area: 7,244 square feet Hardscape area: 7,525 square feet 9-2 The west side of East Ave. from 339 feet north of Brookfield to 157 north of Brookfield. Brookfield from East Ave. to Oak Crest. The east side of Oak Crest to 137 feet north of Brookfield. Ground Cover area: 2,390 square feet Hardscape area: 6,874 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P478 9-3 The west side of East Ave. from 790 feet north of Highfield to 256 feet south of Highfield. Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet Hardscape area: 10,669 square feet 9-4 The west side of East Ave. From 295 feet north of Via Veneto To Via Veneto. The north side of Via Veneto From East Ave to Dolcetto. The east side of Dolcetto from Via Veneto to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from 372 feet west of Dolcetto to 240 feet east of Dolcetto. The west side of Dolcetto from Miller to Garcia. The north side of Garcia from Dolcetto to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 48,612 square feet Hardscape area: 28,746 square feet 9-5 The north side of Miller from 429 feet west of Dolcetto to 1029 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 6,519 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet 9-6 The north side of Miller from 254 feet east of Dolcetto to 167 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 4,089 square feet Hardscape area: 2,854 square feet 9-8 The south side of Baseline from Etiwanda Ave. to Shelby. The Baseline median form Etiwanda to 473 feet east of Shelby. Ground Cover area: 16,395 square feet Hardscape area: 14,558 square feet 9-9 The north side of Candlewood St. from Exbury St. to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,362 square feet Hardscape area: 786 square feet 9-10 The north side of Baseline form 522 feet east of Forester to 180 feet west of Frester. The Baseline median form 503 feet east of Forester to 200 feet west of Forester. Ground Cover area: 16,930 square feet Hardscape area: 13,600 square feet 9-11 The north side of Mueller Ct. from 40 feet past the east end of Mueller Ct. to 20 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground Cover area: 9,420.square feet Hardscape area: 742 square feet 9-12 The north and south sides of Highland Ave. from 217 feet west of Norcia Dr. to 210 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground Cover area: 12,471 square feet Hardscape area: 14,445 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P479 9-13 The south side of Carnesi Dr. from Etiwanda Ave. to 395 feet east of Murietta Ct. Ground Cover area: 8,919 square feet Hardscape area: 6,203 square feet 9-14 The west side of East Ave. from 665 feet north of Miller to Miller. The north side of Miller from East Ave. to 667 feet west of East Ave. Ground Cover area: 9,150 square feet Hardscape area: 16,226 square feet 9-15 The north side of Base Line Road from Shelby Place to 343 feet east of Shelby Place. Ground Cover area: 3,480 square feet Hardscape area: 4,638 square feet 9-16 The east side of Dolcetto Pl. from Garcia Dr. to Via Veneto Dr. The south side of Via Veneto Dr. from Dolcetto PI. to East Av. The west side of East Av. from Via Veneto Dr. to 276 feet south of Via Veneto Drive. Ground Cover area: 16,310 square feet Hardscape area: 13,411 square feet FH-17 The Foothill Blvd. median from Etiwanda Ave. to Cornwell Ave. Ground Cover area: 8,275 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 .. . .." I-IL—LL iLJ I III IA III I IL.L1_' LJ.Al_4� 480/.1V ! J, II S%Srir--, I I�_IX��1 ri°/ Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 Im ro vemen t Ma d R""`'HO PCICAMONG 1210FN���I LILLJ i � __ -- 1210�WEST.RAMP pyRp Ir200iFW Ig5TS0 J Ip219 HIGHLAND AV � HIGHLAND AV TH IpA� m rT J ILJ 8 1 y ON%-1L CL�I�rIRIIIlI��� � -B-+Y w O B-03 Uh d , r 71 a _II�IL'T0 AST '/J +F a, ' 9 7 AP II a�o t7 0 WATER METER C - ❑. ® IRRIGATION PUMP Qg, sa� FN t � PE TRAIL y7 CHUR s 0 IRRIGATION LINE _s I'ea MILLER AV9.0 PARKS - �` LMD 9 a�.�, E e MAJOR STREET [SLe+ FREEWAY �-- ��°� •� R rAR1c L—_I PARCELS VICTORIA GARDENS.LN / i uu wr us , 1 yII .,u ter• - J ti] • ` �t Tno mg .,d wsvr;nu'nmrm•Wn cuumno E.OTHILL BL._ (. I T� . ° wmp4 pY.na mrouvvm•Lbo/R•mno L.o•mona FH17 .....nto e.•pu r..owo..rp...r.mmrmibn. ' _ �L� J jf!tJ//} ~ 1-o. of R..m.Lmm.,..m.x..� co.. L J. w.mh.r•pmemtlonor pmrmexnbn•wm•nt �jI �RTr] �} [.yumm.•mvgmnp Mmn[wLLn.em[JnY Q$ fit" ! FH-1715IN LMD 9,BUT ymu•imxm.u../x.M mI. of nh.Coo of M wrlr/mY.M'I mabn pr.nY!n.rtln. / OF MAINTAINED BY MARIPOSA Tn.Coo of R•ni,.cro.nmv.wpvmb•M.a.mwrwm �b1y R F m.m...M ma inm,e.mmo..d..nm...ironenp. 11HHI wrna 4nbaro.m•Angie xmm..r m.rcr.m.evb me oNm br•p.Narhr ..TM L14 i R•nM.Cuo sR•1 n.pv -II.,...asum..nl4Lily,rgnebn of W I p. / _ w•bn ror(9•M•nv.,.mb[b'ov ln..mr..bn o..d..n po,f 1. .n .1..M•.nn sr n.tlhn �� mnnp eu.b•M p•v.p vprp yan p.MormMm w•bp4 nvin Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P481 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budqet Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $ 159,600.00 Part-time Salaries 11,200.00 Fringe Benefits 76.440.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 247,240.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 23,600.00 O & M/Computer Equipment 0.00 Cellular Technology 1,370.00 Emergency Equipment & Vehicle Rental 1,200.00 Contract Services 134,770.00 Tree Maintenance 29,070.00 Utilities Water Utilities 66,460.00 Electric Utilities 9,170.00 Assessment Administration 9,100.00 General Overhead 35.410.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 310,150.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay— Equipment $ 0.00 Capital Proiects $ 40,000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 40,000.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 597,390.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 171,960.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 27,090.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 199,050.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 393,480.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 592,530.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 171,964.80 Total District EBU Count 2,149.56 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 80.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 1 $ 542.15 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P482 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 2,033,422.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (398,340.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 1,639,942.00 The City has reserve funds that are more than sufficient to cover an estimated six months' worth of maintenance and servicing costs for the District. When there are excess funds in the District's reserve account, the excess can be used to lower the annual levy to property owners within the District. The City will continue to annually review the estimated costs and expenses for the District as well as reserve fund levels, in order to determine if future levies can be reduced as well. Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P483 Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P484 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement' (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P485 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P486 To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value nDe lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non-Residential Im roved 2.00 Vacant Pro ert 0.25 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table reflects both the maximum allowable assessment and the actual assessment rates for each year since the formation of the district and the proposed assessment rate for fiscal year 2015/16 for the District: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment per EBU Actual Assessment per EBU 2000/01 $375.91 $375.91 2001/02 388.02 375.91 2002/03 398.81 375.91 2003/04 414.44 375.91 2004/05 421.71 375.91 2005/06 1 438.67 375.91 2006/07 459.15 375.91 2007/08 476.76 387.94 2008/09 492.41 387.94 2009/10 492.41 387.94 2010/11 501.55 387.94 2011/12 516.58 187.00 2012/13 1 527.03 187.00 2013/14 1 539.38 80.00 2015/16 1 542.15 80.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9-City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P487 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2002/2003, the amount of the assessment for the District has increased each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The Fiscal Year 2015/16 actual assessment rate is reduced from the prior year due to the City having reserve funds that'are more than sufficient to cover an estimated six months' worth of maintenance and servicing costs for the District. When there are excess funds in the District's reserve account, the excess can be used to lower the annual levy to property owners within the District. The City will continue to annually review the estimated costs and expenses for the District as well as reserve fund levels, in order to determine if future levies can be reduced as well. There will be no Cost of Living rate increase for Fiscal Year 2015/16. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P488 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 91/STOZ JeaA le:)s!j P489 LT eOuowe:)nD oy:)uea;o Al!:)-6 'oN TuuTs!p a:)ueua;u!ew adexpuel 01 v V E m < .F g c 1 C CU �n 1 00 AV Auayo .......... .i o i m o _ ! m 6 � a` i _.._.._.._. J^V lse3 in r � Q i AV epuenn A — AV epuern!13 Q1 ! ! V a 19 Haajo Aea AV Jalsayooa J i � ny Jalsayoob j 1 AV uaH!II!W f..........._._ ! AV uap!!II!IN j 1 1 1 1 1 AV uaneH ! !n V uane H AV esowFaH 1 (44 !ny esowFaH i 1 ^V PIe9!4aiV i ^V PIe9!yuFV t i � ny uew!!aH ! �nV uewllaH T ! AV PFeAau!A 1S uegaweo 1 ! ' •�'�_ 1 ��T'Flil l et i `r� ! Elai{Y{Tlp 9! r-"-"- nV ano�� ! m c m it m 0 00 aY II Y6_pll o Q �EfF m u_ iy{ pp{E]j zEtp m ca S Y? Sjs e7 t:s,;ic 41F� Lirpei!a°1€e P490 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual (County Use Code Per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $80.00 1056.00 1056.00 $84,480.00 Multi-Family Residential 80.00 1,057.00 1,057.00 84,560.00 Non-Residential Improved 80.00 18.28 36.56 2,924.80 Vacant Property 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 1 2,131.28 2,149.56 $171,964.80 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexation is effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Total Total Property Type Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 0227-121-33 08/20/14 TR 16578 6.00 6.00 Single Family & 37 Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P491 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) P492 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P493 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 9 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 12 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 16 Assessment Roll 18 Assessment Roll Annexations P494 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 559,400.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 8.120.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 567,520.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 12.390.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 579,910.00 Total District EBU Count 786.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 711.71 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 834.27 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P495 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. QAOfESS11 py9 yQFS �OHEWgT�G�Fy�m No.COS 3672 Ezp.6-W 1 7 s CM CAUEOQ Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P496 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P497 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P498 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Rancho Etiwanda, which lies north of Highway 210, east of Day Creek Channel, and west of Hanley Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout Rancho Etiwanda. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Day Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location 10-1 The west side of Day Creek from 790 feet north of Richfield to Wilson. The north side of Wilson from Day Creek to 227 feet west of Day Creek. This site overlaps 10-2. Ground Cover area: 16,941 square feet Hardscape area: 3,589 square feet 10-2 The north and south side of Wilson from 497 feet west of Alvarado to Day Creek. The south side of Wilson from Day Creek to Bluegrass. The Wilson median from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 47,275 square feet Hardscape area: 6,444 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 10-City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P499 10-3 The west side of Day Creek from Wilson to 144 feet south of Clydesdale. The Day Creek median from Wislon to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 32,619 square feet Hardscape area: 10,983 square feet 10-4 The east side of Day Creek from 648 feet south of Keenland to Wilson. Ground Cover area: 15,952 square feet Hardscape area: 4,365 square feet 10-5 The west side of Bluegrass from Wilson to 705 feet south of Challendon. Ground Cover area: 26,882 square feet Hardscape area: 12,220 square feet 10-6 The south side of Banyan from Rochester to Day Creek. The north side of Banyan from 427 feet west of Rocking Horse to Rocking Horse. The west side of Day Creek from Banyan to Vintage. The north side of Vintage from Day Creek to Paseo ending 153 feet west of Sand Hill. Ground Cover area: 44,000 square feet Hardscape area: 16,197 square feet 10-7 The north side of Vintage from 180 feet east of Taylor Canon Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Vintage to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 22,164 square feet Hardscape area: 11,724 square feet 10-8 The landscape against the south side facing wall north of the 210 freeway from the top of the slope on the east side of Day Creek to 300 feet eastward. The Day Creek median from the 210 freeway to Vintage. The east side of Day Creek from Caltrans ROW to Vintage. The south side of Vintage from Day Creek to 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon. Ground Cover area: 16,841 square feet Hardscape area: 7,025 square feet 10-9 The north side of Coyote from Brookstone Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Coyote to 358 feet north of Coyote. The west side of Day Creek from 118 feet north of Coyote to 380 feet north of Coyote. Ground Cover area: 9,403 square feet Hardscape area: 6,052 square feet 'This site previously had 8,488 square feet of ground cover and 5,752 of Hardscape prior to the addition of the area on the west side of Day Creek. 10-10 The north side of Wilson from 395 feet east of Day Creek to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Wilson to Blackstone. The south side of Blackstone from Day Creek to Stoneview. The north side of Blackstone from Day Creek to 165 feet west of Stoneview. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10-City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P500 Ground Cover area: 26,304 square feet Hardscape area: 19,117 square feet 10-11 The west side of Day Creek from 340 feet north of Banyan to Banyan. The north side of Banyan from Day Creek to Rocking Horse. Ground Cover area: 20,378 square feet Hardscape area: 11,212 square feet 10-12 The paseo on the east side of Stoneview Rd. across from Duncaster PI. Ground Cover area: 3,326 square feet Hardscape area: 2,374 square feet 10-13 The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from 340 feet south of Vintage Dr. to 915 feet south of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 27,416 square feet Hardscape area: _ 16,167 square feet 10-14 The south side of Vintage from Saddle Tree Dr. to Day Creek. The west side of Day Creek from Vintage to 325 feet south of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 7,777 square feet Hardscape area: 16,167 square feet *This sites irrigation pump and valves are powered from site 10-13 Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 Lan7s�cape Maintenance District No. 10 Improvement Map FA 10 1z Lt 10-3 TJU F1 NT I 4j� 1 05, MTER METER PE TRAIL - IRRIGATION LINE L PARKS 1=3LMD 10 BOUNDARY MAJOR STREET T 1 -1-1.12ioct4ft? FREEWAY RP j PARCELS /17 IfS�1� HIGHLAND AV Landscape Maintenance District No. 1O—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year I015/16 P502 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budqet Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $ 130,200.00 Overtime Salaries 1,050.00 Part-time Salaries 31,110.00 Fringe Benefits 65.880.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 228,240.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 14,500.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilities 4,000.00 O & M/Computer Equipment 0.00 Cellular Technology 0.00 Emergency Equipment&Vehicle Rental 0.00 Emergency Operations and Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 102,600.00 Contract Services/Facilities 2,000.00 Tree Maintenance 10,000.00 Utilities Water Utilities 140,350.00 Electric Utilities 23,100.00 Assessment Administration 4,260.00 General Overhead 52.640.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 353,950.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay—Equipment $ 0.00 Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 582,190.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 559,400.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 8.120.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 567,520.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 12,390.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 579,910.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 559,404.06 Total District EBU Count 786.00 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 711.71 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 834.27 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P503 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 843,801.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (14,670.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 831,411.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P504 Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10-City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P505 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement' (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P5O6 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P507 To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwellin Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code per EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $834.27 $711.71 786.00 786.00 The following table reflects both the maximum allowable assessment and the actual assessment rates for each year since the formation of the district and the proposed assessment rate for fiscal year 2015/16 for the District: Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P508 Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment per EBU Actual Assessment per EBU 2001/02 $597.09 $597.09 2002/03 613.69 597.09 2003/04 637.75 597.09 2004/05 648.93 597.09 2005/06 675.03 597.09 2006/07 706.54 597.09 2007/08 733.65 616.20 2008/09 757.73 616.20 2009/10 757.73 616.20 2010/11 771.79 616.20 2011/12 794.92 616.20 2012/13 811.01 616.20 2013/14 821.46 616.20 2014/15 830.00 647.01 2015/16 834.27 711.71 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Livinq Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2002/2003, the amount of the assessment for the District has increased each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2015/16 will increase from $647.01 to $711.71 per single-family residence, a rate increase of 10% as compared to Fiscal Year 2014/15. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10-City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P509 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 91/SLOZ JeaA leJSlj P510 Li e2uowe3n:) oyuuea jo Al!:)-pi 'ON lauls!Q ameuaju!eW adempuel �► g M.r N O G C 0 I' O ny/wagO �' y N i m o 1 N t 1r m O O C � a` i ® L i V i ny epuenyy `----j ny epuem!13 03 i 09 Jae a .-.-. i ny ialsayaoa ! _ E J i i ny Jatsayooa ny ua�!II!lN f—..........—._ ny uaH!II!W 1 1 1 1 ny uaneH i i my uaneH ny esowJaH (� i ny esowaH i 1 ny Pleq!gojb i I^b' Pleq!yoj'd ny uewllaH i ^y uewllaH i T e i 1 ny pJeAau!n 1S ue!lawez) i i EI SI�iF�l:E� ny anal co x 65 r oi J - 3 m u_ iEEa3siqi 5r - t °a pl�yp tt��E3�Fli! P511 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 actual assessment for the District: Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual (County Use Code Per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $711.71 786.00 786.00 $559,404.06 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P512 STAFF REPORT - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: July 15, 2015 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technologyxy,4 By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT, DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATES FOR FY 2015/16 IS PROPOSED OR PERMITTED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolutions ordering the preparation of the Annual Engineer's Reports to initiate proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the Annual Engineer's Report, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. There is no increase to the current rates for Fiscal Year 2015/2016. The Engineer's Report is also on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: PD 85 was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40-acre facility located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District's boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn and Terra Vista Planned Communities. The final debt service payment on the bonds that were sold to finance the construction of Red Hill and Heritage Community Parks was paid on September 1, 2005. With the debt repaid, in 2006 the annual assessments were decreased from $52 per year per single-family residence to $31 per year. The annual assessments levied and collected are dedicated to the ongoing maintenance and operation and periodic capital improvement expenditures for the parks. P513 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RF.,SOLUTIONS ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PACr•:2 THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS TO INI'I'IATL I>ROCE'EDINGS'1'O I.,EVY ANNUAL . ASSESSMENTS,PRELIMINARILY APPROVETHH.ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPOR'P, DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS VgTHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FORA PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2015/16 IS PROPOSED OR PF,R1v11TTED. ]uj.t, 15,2015 For several years, PD 85 had been running at a deficit as expenses for utilities and maintenance of expenses have increased. However, rates for this district cannot be increased without an election process to give the property owners the opportunity to express their support for, or in opposition to, an increase in such assessment. A proposed new West-Side Parks and Street Lighting District would replace the existing Park District PD-85, Landscape Maintenance Districts 1, 3A, 3B, and 5, and Street Lighting Districts 2 and 6. These districts would be completely dissolved and their assessments eliminated upon the formation of the proposed district and approval of the levy of special taxes within such district by the qualified electors of such district. At the City Council meeting of July 1, 2015, the City Council unanimously voted to move the replacement district for consideration by the voters on the November 2015 ballot. In the meantime, a set of budget-balancing measures has been implemented that is adequate in the near term to bring revenues and expenditures into alignment. The measures include staff reductions, expanding the use of contract mowing services, reducing the maintenance of site amenities (lights, playgrounds, sand, etc.) to the most basic levels, naturalizing additional turf areas at Red Hill and Heritage Parks, and providing less direct support to sports groups using sports fields. Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must adopt resolutions initiating proceedings to levy the assessments, approve the Annual Engineer's Report and declare its intention to levy and collect assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment ner Parcel Single Family Residential $31.00 Multi-Family Residential $31.00 Less than 1.50 acres $15.50 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres $46.50 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres $108.50 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres $217.00 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres $434.00 25.01 acres and larger $775.00 Attachments Resolutions P514 RESOLUTION NO. 15-122 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertaken proceedings to form and has formed that certain maintenance district pursuant to pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act"), known and designated as Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 (the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the annual costs for maintenance and servicing of improvements within the District; and WHEREAS, the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments shall relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2015, and ending June 30, 2016 ("Fiscal Year 2015/16"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. New Improvements or Substantial Changes in Existing Improvements. No new improvements are proposed to be added to the improvements to be maintained or serviced and no substantial changes in the existing improvements are proposed to be made for Fiscal Year 2015/16. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Report. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare and file with this City Council an Annual Engineer's Report for the District relating to such annual assessment and levy in such District in accordance with the provisions of 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"). SECTION 4. Filing of the Annual Engineer's Report. Upon completion, the Annual Engineer's Report for the District shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to the Assessment Law. P515 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15`h day of July, 2015 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on , 2015. Executed this at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P516 RESOLUTION NO. 15-123 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "1972 Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of a report for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/16 (the "Annual Engineer's Report") in a certain maintenance assessment district known and designated as Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD 85 (the "District"); and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Annual Engineer's Report for the District as required by the Assessment Law and as previously directed by Resolution; and WHEREAS, this City Council has now examined and reviewed the Annual Engineer's Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth in such report, and is satisfied that the assessments on a preliminary basis, have been spread within the District in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements to be maintained and serviced, as set forth in the Annual Engineer's Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Annual Engineer's Reports. The Annual Engineer's Report for the District as presented, consisting of the following: A. Plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and the extent of such maintenance; B. An estimate of the cost of the maintenance of the improvements for the District for Fiscal Year 2015/16; C. A diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed; and P517 D. An annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 of the estimated costs of the maintenance and servicing of those improvements to be maintained and serviced during such Fiscal Year, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within such District in proportion to the special benefits received is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Annual Engineer's Report. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15`h day of July 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on , 2015. Executed this at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P518 RESOLUTION NO. 15-124 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 IN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed that certain maintenance district and authorized the levy of assessments therein pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act") in what is known and designated as Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD 85 (the "District"); and WHEREAS, this City Council has initiated proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/16, to finance the costs and expenses necessary for continued maintenance and servicing of improvements within the District; and WHEREAS, at this time, there has been presented and approved by this City Council, a separate report for the District identified by the distinctive designation of such District and entitled "Fiscal Year 2015/16 Annual Engineer's Report" (the "Annual Engineer's Report") as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), and this City Council desires to conduct the proceedings to authorize the levy of the annual assessments within the District; and WHEREAS, the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/16 proposed to be levied within the District as set forth in the report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/16 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Improvements and Maintenance and Servicing Thereof. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments within the District for the continued maintenance and servicing of the improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced within such District. "Maintenance" may include the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: (a) repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement; (b) providing for the life, growth, health, P519 and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; (c) the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; and, (d) the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. "Service" may include the furnishing of: (a) electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for the lighting or operation of any improvements; and, (b) water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements. A description of the improvements to be maintained and the maintenance and services to be provided is set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Report. The Annual Engineer's Report regarding the annual levy for the District for Fiscal Year 2015-2016, has been preliminarily approved and directed to be filed in the office the City Clerk. Reference is made to such Report for the District for a full and detailed description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced, the boundaries of such District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within such District. SECTION 4. Assessment. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order the annual levy of assessments for the District as set forth and described in the Annual Engineer's Report, and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service as estimated in such Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 5. Boundaries of District. The proposed maintenance and service work as described in the Annual Engineer's Report for the District is, in the opinion of this City Council, of special benefit to the properties within the boundaries of such District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service chargeable upon such District, which District said City Council hereby declares to be the District specially benefited by such maintenance and service, and to be further assessed pursuant to the Assessment Law to pay the costs and expenses thereof. The District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries thereof; as such District is shown on a map or maps as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of such District. SECTION 6. Public Hearing. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held the 5th day of August, 2015, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting of the City Council, being in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, which is the time and place fixed by this City Council for the hearing of protests or objections in reference to the annual levy of assessments, to the extent of the maintenance, by any interested person and any other matters contained in this resolution. Any persons who wish to object to the proceedings for the annual levy should file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the time set and scheduled for said public hearing. P52O SECTION 7. For Information Regarding Proceedings. For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person at the City: Ingrid Bruce Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2700, Ext 2575 SECTION 8. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish, pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, a copy of this Resolution in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said publication shall be made one time and not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the Public Hearing. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15`" day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 12015. Executed this at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P521 Appendix A Descriptions of Improvements and Maintenance and Services This Appendix A contains a general description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and a description of such maintenance and services. 1. The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. A - 1 P522 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 gQOFESS/py REWJ" Fyc/ � No.0053672 " 9 � Exp.B30•;1 � � Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer P523 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT NO. PD-85 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P524 TABLE OF CONTENTS Authority for Report 1 Findings 7 District Analysis 2 Estimate of Work 3 Method of Spread 6 Annexations 7 Boundary Map 7 P525 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 2015/2016 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 thereafter referred to as "the District'. This District, using direct benefit assessments, was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Subsequently the debt has been repaid with only the ongoing maintenance and operation with periodic capital improvement expenditures of the parks remaining. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the bases of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal governments is not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission right-of-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P526 DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. District Boundary The district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn & Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD — 85. C. Facilities The existing works within the District boundary are generally described as follows: 1. The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizens facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P527 ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. Proposed Maintenance Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries $326,720.00 Overtime Salaries 3,680.00 Part Time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 153.270.00 Subtotal $483,670.00 Operations & Maintenance Operations & Maintenance $74,310.00 Operations & Maintenance - Facilities 2,500.00 Vehicle Operations & Maintenance 0.00 Emergency Equipment &Veh. Rntl 0.00 Equip Operations & Maint. 8,000.00 Contract Services 84,590.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 18,200.00 Telephone Utilities 8,450.00 Water Utilities 215,590.00 Electric Utilities 103,910.00 Assessment Administration 153,430.00 Admin./General Overhead 115,780.00 Subtotal $784,760.00 Capital Outlay Capital Outlay- Improv. Other than Bldg 0.00 Subtotal 0.00 Total PD-85 Expenditure Budget $1,268,430.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Projected Revenue (includes projected $1,256,470.00 delinquencies and interest& penalties) Operating Reserve Contribution 11,960.00 Total PD 85 Revenue Budget $1268,430.00 Total District Assessment $1,156.920.00 Total District Parcel Count 27,569 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85-City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P528 The actual assessment will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Opening Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund $832,788.00 Use of Operating Reserve — Fiscal Year 2015/16 11,960.00 Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund $820,828.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Overtime Salaries: This item includes costs attributed to work performed by full-time employees over and above their normal scheduled hours. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the parks improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the parks improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the parks. Utilities —Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping and parks. Utilities — Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the parks lighting, sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P529 District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County Tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P530 METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefit received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A — includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B — includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C CATEGORY C — includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels are those parcels listed by the County Assessor's as exempt and/or which have an assessed value of less than $500. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size/Range Dwelling Units/Parcel Less than 1.5 Acres and 1 or more dwelling units 1.51 to 3.5 Acres and 2 or more dwelling units 3.51 to 7.0 Acres and 4 or more dwelling units 7.01 to 14.0 Acres and 8 or more dwelling units 14.01 to 25 Acres and 15 or more dwelling units 25.01 Acres and larger 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownership; Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P531 3. Railroad mainline rights-of-way; 4. Major utility transmission rights-of-way; 5. Mineral rights; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and, C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate, which will be levied during fiscal year 2015/2016, is $31.00 per residential dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $31.00 times the number of residential dwelling units. Category B: The assessment, which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 2015/2016, shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment Per Parcels Single Family Residential $31.00 Multi-Family Residential $31.00 Less than 1.5 Acres $15.50 1.51 Acres to 3.50 Acres $46.50 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres $108.50 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres $217.00 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres $434.00 25.01 Acres and larger $775.00 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Boundary Map An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 91/sTOZJeaklexij P532 g eSuoweon:) og3u"to Al!:)—SS-dd 'ON hulsid luauJanoJdwj uolleaJOaa pue slJed � N v 4 c ac ° £ a V < J w N C (J Q _ o 'y AV Jays CE J �r�t u� 1r 1 Of O 0 O h m LL W � ! ^V ise3 rn (� L Q i any epuenAg3 Ay epu enAy3 ! 1 aaj e 1.�.�.._.._._.�i AV Jajsayooa ny Jalsayooa AV uaj1jj!W AV UaI!II!W AV uaneH ny uaneH AV esOLuJaH AV eSOWJaH AV pleQ!yoJV AV pleQ!yoJV AV uewllaH AV uewllaH U) L L � ny pJeRauln 1S uelyweo oilfl tt ggya i AV aAOJO 5 i e c m (Y V1 [ E1.pIts agi L J = ? L f.P�iSfPE �B N N O zs C liY e. ,t m Ei m � T gill1 L +EEY m gF ca P533 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICL+'S GROUP RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY FOR THE COSTS INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1, MASI PLAZA. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED TO SET THE ANNUAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR THIS DISTRICT AS THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WERE ESTABLISHED DURING FORMATION OF THE DISTRICT AND REMAIN UNCHANGED THROUGH THE LIFE OF THE BONDS, PURSUANT TO THE IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT OF 1915 DIVISION 10 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing an annual levy for the costs incurred in the collection of assessments within Assessment District No. 93-1 Masi Plaza. No action is required to set the annual special assessment for this district as the special assessments were established during formation of the district and remain unchanged through the life of the bonds, pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Division 10 of the California Streets and Highway Code. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 4, 1997 $2,990,000 in bonds were issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City') pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Bond Law"). All of the proceedings of the City to form the District, to levy the assessments and to acquire the improvements described and being financed with the proceeds of the bonds had been undertaken pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Improvement Act'), and Resolution of Intention No. 97-104 adopted by the City Council of February 19, 1997. The District, comprising approximately 23.64 acres, is situated along the south side of Foothill Boulevard and the west side of Rochester Avenue and consists of twenty-five developed lots subject to assessment. Proceeds of the bonds were used to acquire certain streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, traffic signal, water, sewer, storm drainage, public amenities and certain public utility improvements, constructed within the District and necessary for the existing and proposed development within the District. The Method of Assessment for the District was determined by the Assessment Engineer. The acquisition costs and proportionate share of the incidental costs for bid items were spread on a net assessable acreage basis to those areas of subareas of the District that specifically benefited from the works of improvements to be acquired. The Assessment Engineer determined that the special P534 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY FOR THE COSTS INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ASSESSME NT DISTRICT NO. 93-1, MAST PLAZA. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED TO SET THE ANNUAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR'THIS DISTRICT AS THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WERE ESTABLISHED DURING FORMATION OF THE DISTRICT AND REMAIN UNCHANGED THROUGH THE LIFE OF THE BONDS, PURSUANT TO THE IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT OF 1915 DIVISION 10 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE. JULY 15,2015 PAGP.2 benefits received from the above cited works of improvements were in direct proportion to the number of assessable net acres of the record lots. The assessments were spread over all parcels within the boundary based upon its proportion of the total assessable acreage within the District. Net assessable acreage for all lots within the District was taken directly from the "per lot" net acreage shown on the recorded parcel without offset for easements. Section 8682 of the Government Code authorizes cities to collect an annual assessment fee of a maximum five percent (5%) of the amount of installments and not to exceed sixteen dollars per parcel assessment for the costs incurred in the administration and assessment collection. The requested fee will allow the City to recover funds for collection and management of assessment districts that are applicable to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. Rancho Cucamonga's comprehensive management program including record keeping, cost management, payoff calculations, monthly financial reports, debt service schedules, as well as providing information to the public is funded from this fee. This fee is in place now to pay for administration and will allow the City to maintain the current rate and level of service. The assessment shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through FY 2022-2023. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P535 RESOLUTION NO. 15-125 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has heretofore undertaken proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed assessments upon land within various special assessment districts (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Assessment Districts"); and WHEREAS, said proceedings provided for and the City did subsequently issue bonds pursuant to the `Improvement Bond Act of 1915', being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said bonds representing unpaid assessments within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, the City does incur necessary administrative expenses in the collection of the annual installments of the assessment within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8682 does authorize the City to establish an assessment surcharge to allow the City to recover its expenses of collection of said assessments; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish such an assessment surcharge as authorized by said Government Code Section 8682. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: Treasurer is hereby directed to add to the annual installment of assessments within the Assessment Districts a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of the installments and of the interest thereon, not to exceed the Treasurer's estimate of the expenses of collection. Said expenses of collection shall include the necessary administrative expenses of the City incurred in providing the County Auditor with current information regarding the ownership or division of the affected lots or parcels of land within the Assessment Districts to ensure the proper entry by the County Auditor in his or her assessment roll and the timely collection of the Assessment installments. SECTION 3: The above assessment surcharge,when collected, shall belong to the City and shall cover the expenses and compensation of the Treasurer incurred in the collection of the assessments, and of the interest and penalties added on to the assessments. P536 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of July, 2015. Executed this 15th day of July, 2015, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P537 Resolution No.15-125 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 MAST PLAZA ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2015 P538 Resolution No.15-125 BACKGROUND On August 4, 1997, $2,990,000 in bonds were issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City") pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Bond Law"), a Resolution authorizing issuance of the Bonds adopted by the City Council on June 18, 1997 (the "Bond Resolution") and a Bond Indenture, dated as of June 1, 1997 (the "Indenture"), by and between the City and the Fiscal Agent. All of the proceedings of the City to form the District, to levy the assessments and to acquire the improvements described and being financed with the proceeds of the bonds had been undertaken pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Improvement Act'), and Resolution of Intention No. 97-104 adopted by the City Council on February 19, 1997. Proceeds of the bonds were used to acquire certain streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, traffic signal, water, sewer, storm drainage, public amenities and certain public utility improvements, constructed within the District and necessary for the existing and proposed development within the District. The Method of Assessment for the District was determined by the Assessment Engineer. The acquisition costs and proportionate share of the incidental costs for bid items were spread on a net assessable acreage basis to those areas or subareas of the District that specifically benefited from the works of improvements to be acquired. The Assessment Engineer determined that the special benefits received from the above cited works of improvements were in direct proportion to the number of assessable net acres of the record lots. The assessments were spread over all parcels within the boundary based upon its proportion of the total assessable acreage within the District. Net assessable acreage for all lots within the District was taken directly from the "per lot" net acreage shown on the recorded parcel without offset for easements. The District, comprising approximately 23.64 acres, is situated along the south side of Foothill Boulevard and the west side of Rochester Avenue and consists of twenty-five developed lots subject to assessment (the "Assessment Parcels"). The following is a list of businesses located within the District: Assessment District 93-1 1 FY2015/2016 P539 Resolution No. 15-125 Building Phase Lot A n Tenants 1 1 1 22901211 Valvoline Instant Oil Change 2 1 2 22901212 Shell Service Station and Seven Eleven 3 1 3 22901213 Jack in the Box Taco Hut, Popeye's Chicken, Boba and Water, 1 Empty Suite, and Manila 4 1 4 22901214 Sunset Grille 5A 1 5 22901215 GEN Korea Barbecue, Gards Music 58 1 5 22901215 Abi Sabi Teppan Steak House& Sushi Bar 6 1 6 22901216 Denny's Restaurant Empty Suite,#1 Pho Noodle&Grill, Stadium Dental, Orthodontics', 7 1 7 22901217 Barbershop 8 1 8 22901218 Goodyear Tires 9 1 9 22901219 Quality Auto, Empty Suite 10 1 10 22901220 Lim's Honda, Acura and Mazda 11 & 11 II 27 22901230 24 Hour Fitness 12A II 12 22901221 Legends Nails, Nutrition 4 Less The Bra Lady, Jurassic Jungle 12B II 12 22901221 Designer Suits Outlet,and 3 Empty Suites 13 II 13 22901222 Vista Paint, Roger Dunn Golf Shop, and 1 Empty Suite, 909 Pub and Grill 14 11 14 22901223 En rave'N Embrodier,Vapor Lounge, and 2 Empty Suites 15A 11 15 22901224 SummitRid a Church, Farmers Insurance and MetLife 15B 11 15 22901224 Five Empty Suites 16A 11 16 22901231 Martial Arts Studio all five Suites 3 Suites for Haven Interactive and 2 Suites for State Farm, and Chabot Wealth 16B 11 16 22901231 Management 16C 11 16 22901232 Parking Lot 18A III 20 22901266 Six Empty Suites 18B 111 21 22901264 Pacific Century Investments, and Four Empty Suites 18& 19A 111 19 22901267 Mountain View Oral Surgery, True Beauty Aesthetic and one Empty Suite 17& 19B III 18 22901268 Two Empty Suites, and LowTCenter, 2 Suites for CW Driver Construction 20 III 22 22901269 Matrix Institute of Addiction Suites 102 A& B and one Empty Suite 24 III 24 22901261 Smog Stop, 1 Empty Suite RalliCandi and Discount Auto 25 III 25 22901235 Eurotech Imports,Allstar Auto Center and Empty Suite 26 III 26 22901236 Em t Suite 11 & 27 II 27 22901230 24 Hour Fitness Bonds for the District are scheduled to be paid off in September of 2022 Assessment District 93-1 2 FY2015/2016 P540 Resolution No. 15-125 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $237,500.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 4,570.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 $243,570.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 5,760.00 SPECIAL TAX $237,810.00 $243,570.00 Assessment District 93-1 3 FY2015/2016 P541 C/.;� V/ N J yr 0) ® r Q o I a •� N p� ny AdLayD N �7 —j S. o C N N -- m B e LL Q y I 1nVFSea Q i AV epuew;a — — �—— -- — i ny epuenn!13 LLLL � AV La;sa400a --- ----- -- . j ny La;sayooa i AV ua)191!W r�.._.v �.. , 4--1 AV ua)l!II!W ny uaneH — — i jnyuaneH I AVesowiaH i —�— — — — --._..._..._—'nyesowLaH AV PIe9!40JV I — --�AV PIe9!40jV ny uewllaH --! -- — n J y uewllaH U)i L L I ny pLedo Aaur i I- _ j EI€�:IEI�ebF ;a; aba — AV ana [ J 3 t S€�Ld�l aY= 0 0 A O Q cep iE2�FY Cr C m li v c � ` .r@ fill N R (B-0�dp'ggns�� Ofo� Y9"sie$EYn.A =5 Fg1�d3.e0 a.�' ?8!�dYt asY i2 Assessment District 93-1 4 FY2015/2016 P542 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology* By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting an annual benefit assessment levy for the maintenance and/or servicing of a drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 6, 1991, City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-331 for the annual levy of benefit assessments for the maintenance and/or servicing of a 27+ acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2, Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Drainage Area No. 91-2 was a developer-initiated district. Protection of the properties from the overland flows was necessary in order to receive development rights from the City. The costs associated with the maintenance of this district are passed on to the property owners, as they receive special and direct benefit that is distinguishable from the other property owners that are outside the boundary. There are 351 single-family homes within this boundary that receive this benefit. The total annual cost for maintenance to each home is $92.17. Currently, this district is operating at a significant deficit and is being backfilled with Reserve funds to provide services. Staff is researching funding alternatives to alleviate the operating deficit. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Supplement to Final Engineer's Report 3. Map P543 RESOLUTION NO. 15-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertook proceedings to authorize the levy and imposition of benefit assessments to pay for the annual drainage maintenance, including the removal of sediment and debris from the Day Canyon Channel improvements and basin, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the 'Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 54703), said area of benefit being known and designated as DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (the "Drainage Area"); and WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented to this City Council a Supplemental Report (the "Supplemental Report") to the Final Engineer's Report Drainage Area No. 91-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga setting forth a description of the proposed service, cost estimate and assessment schedule for fiscal year 2015/2016; and WHEREAS, at this time this City Council desires to determine the cost of providing authorized services to be financed by the levy of a benefit assessment for fiscal year 2015/2016 and to determine and impose such benefit assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the Supplemental Report is hereby approved and ordered to be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. Said Supplemental Report generally consists of the following: A. A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived through the levy and collection of the benefit assessment; B. A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment; C. The amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel. P544 SECTION 3: That the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report is hereby adopted and has been utilized as the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment to be levied in fiscal year 2015/2016. SECTION 4: That this City Council hereby determines and orders that the benefit assessments described in the Supplemental Report within the Drainage Area are hereby confirmed and levied for fiscal year 2015/2016. SECTION 5: That the above confirmed and levied benefit assessment for fiscal year 2015-2016 shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as general County property taxes are collected and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of such County taxes shall be applicable to the collection and enforcement of these benefit assessments. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED 15th day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of July, 2015. Executed this 15th day of July, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P545 Resolution No. 15-126 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William J. Alexander, Councilmember Lynne Kennedy, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III JULY 2015 P546 Resolution No. 15-126 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Report Exhibit A - Description of Service Exhibit B - Cost Estimate Exhibit C - Assessment Schedule Map Benefit Assessment District 91-2 I FY2015/16 P547 Resolution No. 15-126 AGENCY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT: DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 TO: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982 This Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report (the "Annual Supplement") for City of Rancho Cucamonga Drainage Area No. 91-2 is hereby submitted consisting of the following documents, pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703. This Annual Supplement is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016. 1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE (Exhibit 'A"): A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived from the levy and collection of the annual benefit assessment. 2. COST ESTIMATE (Exhibit "B"): A listing of all costs and expenses for the next fiscal year, including incidental expenses. 3. BENEFIT ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE (Exhibit "C"): The annual assessment schedule, setting forth the following: A. Annual Benefit Assessment: The amount of the proposed benefit assessment for each parcel. B. Description of Parcel: A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment, said parcel being described by the County Assessor's parcel number. Benefit Assessment District 91-2 2 FY2015/16 P548 Resolution No. 15-126 No benefit assessments shall be imposed or levied upon land owned by a Federal or State governmental agency and/or any other local agency. Any utility property and right-of-way shall be subject to assessment only to the extent that it is specifically benefited from the proposed services. Reference is made to the Final Engineer's Report as incorporated in Resolution No. 91- 331 for a description of the boundaries of the Drainage Area and each parcel therein and for the method of spreading the benefit assessment. Executed this 15th day of July, 2015, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA By: Final approval, confirmation, and levy of the annual benefit assessment and all matters in the Annual Supplement were made on the 15TH day of July, 2015, by adoption of Resolution No. 15-126 by the City Council. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A copy of said Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report was filed in the Office of the City Engineer and the City Clerk on the 15TH day of July, 2015. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA DI ENGINEERING, ERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Benefit Assessment District 91-2 3 FY2015/16 P549 Resolution No. 15-126 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE The properties within Drainage Area No. 91-2 are located within the boundaries of the Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Protection of the properties within the district from overland flows requires the construction of a 27+ acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel. The channel improvements will intercept the overland flows prior to reaching the properties and carry the storm water runoff, sediment, trash, organic material, and related debris to a desilting basin. Each year the sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris that accumulates in the desilting basin and channel must be removed and transported to an approved spoils site. The services proposed to be financed from the revenue derived from the levy and collections of the annual benefit assessment are as follows: A. Monthly on-site inspections of the desilting basin and channel. B. Bi-monthly weed abatement program for the desilting basin and channel. C. Removal of accumulated sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris from the desilting basin and channel to an approved spoils site. This service is expected to be provided annually. During times of excessive rainfall, this service may be required more frequently. Benefit Assessment District 91-2 4 FY2015/16 P550 Resolution No. 15-126 EXHIBIT B COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 A. Cost of Annual Maintenance Regular Salaries $32,730.00 Fringe Benefits $15,040.00 Subtotal $47,770.00 B. Incidental Expenses City Administration $ 7,290.00 Subtotal $ 7,290.00 C. Total Annual Costs $55,060.00 D. Contribution/Fund Balance ($22,540.00) Interest Earnings ( 880.00) Delinquencies ( 350.00) E. Balance to Assessment $31,290.00 Benefit Assessment District 91-2 5 FY2015/16 P551 Resolution No. 15-126 EXHIBIT C ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE WHEREAS, this City Council has previously, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703, formed Drainage Area No. 91-2 all in accordance with the provisions of said Act; and, WHEREAS, the Annual Supplement for Fiscal Year 2015-2016 consisting of certain documentation (including the amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel, a description of the parcel and a description of the service proposed to be provided) has now been prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, the Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer by virtue of the power vested pursuant to said Act and by order of the legislative body, hereby makes and recommends the following benefit assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the service proposed to be financed through the levy of assessments and revenue derived for the fiscal year 2015-2016. Said costs and expenses are generally as follows: Personnel Salaries $ 47,770.00 Cost of Improvements $ 0.00 Incidental Expenses $ 7,290.00 Total Costs $ 55,060.00 Contribution/Fund Balance ($ 22,540.00) Subtotal $ 32,520.00 Interest ($ 880.00) Delinquent Assessments ($ 350.00) Balance to Assessment $ 31,290.00 1 do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the several parcels of land within the area of benefit in proportion to the estimated benefits received, and hereby further state as follows: A. The amount of benefit assessment imposed is specifically related to the benefit of the parcel, which will be derived from the provision of the service to be provided. B. The annual aggregate amount of the total benefit assessment does not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service. C. The revenue derived from the benefit assessment shall not be used to pay for the cost of any service other than the service for which the benefit assessment was levied. Benefit Assessment District 91-2 6 FY2015/16 P552 Resolution No. 15-126 The assessment parcels herein refer to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels, and said Roll shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. The net amount to be assessed upon the lands has been spread and apportioned by formula as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report in accordance with the benefits received from each parcel, and in my opinion, said costs and expenses have been apportioned in direct relationship to the benefits received from the maintenance works of improvement. In the opinion of the undersigned, the benefit assessments have been spread and apportioned in accordance with the benefits to be received from the proposed work and services. oQPOFESS/pp9 yQ� REWSjI�F.�y No.0013672G9 , Exp.6.306 1 i Dated: July 15, 2015 s CMi a��P CAl\F0 DI ENGINEERING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT PARCEL PROPERTY AMOUNT OF NUMBER DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT 1087-261-01 to 11 351 Residential Parcels $32,352.00 1087-271-01 to 42 1087-281-01 to 58 1087-291-01 to 20 1087-301-01 to 35 1087-311-01 to 38 1087-321-01 to 34 1087-331-01 to 61 1087-341-01 to 58 Total $32,352.00 Benefit Assessment District 91-2 7 FY2015/16 P553 N N *r = N C 0 CO AV kU040 y %'k N N ` C O d! k ®v ^AV ISe3 in Q AV eP14 — ( AV epuem113 � 9NaaJpAe4 —'( �i , Co AV Jaleayood Il ` �nyJalsayaoa el iJ AVU91!p!yyir���! l�—t { s 1, IAyuaWll!W AV uaneH -- —�r'. ----- — ----�-_ _—� tt � nVUaneH I111 AV e9Ow1aH -- (�r ' I � nyesauuaH ^VPleq!4oJV f —�I- —�AVPle4!4oJV ny uewpaH ny uewllaH �AVPJE6au!n 1S uepaweo i rs� yg r—'7 .��'Z AV QAOJcj a laisy e) i L.�.�_�....._..�.I'i1�• t to 00 IjI a ili E (o 0 c m i° ¢ € e�g;4 zali C �gY;s gas F• = m ap F$dJIM s SiE�iEE:$IF Benefit Assessment District 91-2 8 FY2015/l6 P554 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the special tax to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 7, 2000, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $1,365,000. On November 15, 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 645 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on December 21, 2000, for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain public facilities that included street, sewer, water, storm drain, landscaping and park improvements that were required for and would permit the development of the properties within the district. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2024-2025. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of$658,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. The levy of special taxes annually is based on the square footage of the home for residential properties and is based on acreage for non-residential properties. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P555 RESOLUTION NO. 15-127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Year 2015-2016 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P556 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P557 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of July 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of July 2015. Executed this 15th day of July 2015, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P558 Resolution No.15-127 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 SOUTH ETIWANDA ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2015 P559 Resolution No.15-127 BACKGROUND On November 7, 2000, the eligible landowner voters within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) authorized the issuance of bonds in the principal amount of $1,365,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of a portion of the facilities which generally are defined as street, storm drain, sewer, water landscaping and park improvements. The District is located east of Interstate 15 and is bordered by Foothill Boulevard to the south, East Avenue to the east, Base Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the west and is intersected by Miller Avenue. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $658,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD 2000-01 SOUTH ETIWANDA DESCRIPTION BUILDING ZISE ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX 1. Residential Property > 2301 Sq Ft $298.12 2. Residential Property 1801 — 2300 Sq Ft $283.22 3. Residential Property <1800 Sq Ft $253.41 Community Facilities District No.2000-01 I FY2015/2016 P560 Resolution No. 15-127 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $ 58,900.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 22,400.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 $ 82,800.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 550.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCES $ 4,020.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 1,320.00 SPECIAL TAX $ 76,910.00 $ 82,800.00 Community Facilities District No.2000-01 2 FY2015/2016 P561 LL ti _v o � o ° J N � � C � o w nV wa4� J P o w 8 — —�AV3se3 rn ny epueM43 ny epueMll3 13 AUG AV Jaysatpoa ny Jalsatpoa AV uatl!11lW AV u81011!w I I I nyuaneH nyuaneH I AV esowiaH i —( ` nyesouuaH nV plegl4aiV ^V Pleq!4wV AV uewpaH �. rn ny uewllaH I a i nV PieRaulA 1g uellawe� { py qq 11U f Ail r_j —r •iQ � n i rn m in nyenag j fit M 111,1101! 1 1.1111.3 fill c. \��•z� ded(iF 1�1�1 Community Facilities District No.2000-01 3 FY2015/2016 P562 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP Date: July 15, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting an annual special tax levy for Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the special tax to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 7, 2000, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of$6,835,000. On December 6, 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 646 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on December 21, 2000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Milliken Avenue, Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard with the street improvements to include but are not limited to demolition and grading, curb, gutter and sidewalks, traffic signals; entry feature and signs; fire hydrants; storm drains; water and sewer improvements; paving; striping; landscaping and irrigation improvements; public utilities and appurtenances. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of$5,407,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: 1. The Special Tax shall be levied on each Taxable Parcel in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Maximum Annual Special Tax; or 2. If less monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement, the Special Tax shall be levied proportionally on each Taxable Parcel at less than 100% of the Maximum Annual Special Tax. P563 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILTTIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK WITH NO INCREASE -1'0 THE CURRENT RATE. AUGUST'6,2015 PAGE,2 For FY 2015/2016 the current rate is sufficient to meet fiscal obligations and there is no need for an increase of the special tax. This Special Tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2024-2025. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P564 RESOLUTION NO. 15-128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2000-02(RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK)FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds. ,fir. C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act. P565 D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTIONS: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTIONS: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of July 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of July 2015. Executed this 15th day of July 2015, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P566 Resolution No. 15-128 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2015 P567 Resolution No. 15-128 BACKGROUND On November 7, 2000, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $6,835,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Milliken Avenue, Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard; such street improvements to include but not to be limited to: demolition and grading, curb, gutter and sidewalks, traffic signals; entry feature and signs; fire hydrants; storm drains; water and sewer improvements; paving; striping; landscaping and irrigation improvements; public utilities and appurtenances. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $5,407,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. Each July 1, commencing July 1, 2012 the Maximum Annual Special Tax will be increased by two percent (2%) of the amount in effect for the previous fiscal year. The Special Taxes will be levied as follows: (1) The Special Tax will be levied on each Taxable Parcel in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Maximum Annual Special Tax; or (2) If the Special Tax Requirement will be satisfied by an amount less than the Maximum Annual Special Tax the Special Tax will be levied proportionately on each Taxable Parcel at less than 100% of the Maximum Annual Special Tax. Therefore, for FY 2015/2016 the current rate is sufficient to meet fiscal obligations and there is no need for an increase of the special tax by 2%. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2024-2025. FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 The annual tax rate for fiscal year 2015-2016 will be $3,980.10 per acre, and will provide sufficient funding for maintenance and operations in the amount of$551,690.00. Community Facilities District No.2000-02 I FY2015/2016 P568 Resolution No. 15-128 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $489,110.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 61,080.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 CAPITAL PROJECT $ 0.00 $551,690.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 1,830.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 0.00 TRANSFER IN FROM FUND BALANCE $ 12,390.00 SPECIAL TAX $537,470.00 $551,690.00 $3,980.10 PER ACRE Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 2 FY2015/2016 P569 N d O N E J N U d w�i $ ny/ways d if y � o N 0 ! c 59 y r m o LL V �nVlse3 v, /c 1 L_ LL ny epueMp3 �ny ePuem!13 �8 MaaJO ABO AV Jalsayooa AV Aaysatpoa U AV uaM!11.% �._�_�e — AV uaMll!W I AV uaneH ' ny uaneH 1 , AV esouliaH �I --- AV esouuaH nV PIeQ!LW V AV PlegltpJV AV uewllaH i N nV uewllaH IU' r i ^V PteAaulA IS uelyweo I �T 7 e a 05 m m ��{{ � ;i ; z3 EIEi[1E�191� Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 3 FY2015/2016 P570 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 C;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 A (RANCHO SUMMIT) 2015 SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 A (Rancho Summit) 2014 Special Tax Refunding Bonds. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for FY 2015-2016. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 11, 2000 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 A authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $9,835,000. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax, and on September 21, 2005 approved Resolution No. 05-278 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District was authorized to finance park improvements including clearing and grading of park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape landscaping of parks and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north; State Route (210) Freeway to the south; Interstate 15 Freeway to the east and East Avenue to the west. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. On July 16, 2015 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-XXX authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 in the principal amount of$8,500,000 were issued on July 31, 2015. Based upon pro formas, this refunding has the potential of saving the property owners of approximately $120,000 annually over the remaining life of the bond issue. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P571 RESOLUTION NO. 15-129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) 2015 SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) 2015 SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P572 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P573 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of July, 2015. Executed this 15th day of July, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P574 Resolution No. 15-129 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03A RANCHO SUMMIT 2015 SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2015 P575 Resolution No.15-129 BACKGROUND On October 11, 2000 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 A authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $9,835,000. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax, and on September 21, 2005 approved Resolution No. 05-278 authorizing the issuance of bonds. On July 16, 2014 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-127 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 in the principal amount of$8,500,000 were issued on July 31, 2014. Based upon pro formas, this refunding has the potential of saving the property owners of approximately $120,000 annually over the remaining life of the bond issue. The District was authorized to finance park improvements including clearing and grading of park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape landscaping of parks and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north; State Route (210) Freeway to the south; Interstate 15 Freeway to the east and East Avenue to the west. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 shall be assigned to a Zone and further classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non-Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11. Community Facilities District 2000-03A I FY2015/2016 P576 Resolution No.15-129 FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD2000-03A RANCHO SUMMIT Land Use Description Residential Floor Area Assigned Special Class Tax 1 Residential Property <1,850 Sq. Ft $1,707 2 Residential Property 1,850 — 2,049 Sq. Ft $1,899 3 Residential Property 2,050 — 2,249 Sq. Ft $2,027 4 Residential Property 2,250 — 2,449 Sq. Ft $2,046 5 Residential Property 2,450 — 2,649 Sq. Ft $2,061 6 Residential Property 2,650 — 2,849 Sq. Ft $2,235 7 Residential Property 2,850 — 3,049 Sq. Ft $2,462 8 Residential Property 3,050 — 3,049 Sq. Ft $2,527 9 Residential Property 3,250 — 3,249 Sq. Ft $2,677 10 Residential Property => 3,450 Sq. Ft $2,696 11 Non-Residential N/A $12,600 per Acre Property Community Facilities District 2000-03A 2 FY2015/2016 P577 Resolution No.15-129 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $495,550.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 43,470.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 $540,520.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 3,040.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 8,250.00 TRANSFER IN FROM FUND BALANCE $ 0.00 SPECIAL TAX $ 536,270.00 $547,560.00 Community Facilities District 2000-03A 3 FY2015/2016 P578 M � M 0 O E w+ ¢ L) U U m c v�r AV wa4D N of o V�1 -- N - ---�AVISe3 in v � _ � 1 L ny epueHtp3 j �ny ePuern!33 C AVJaysat Q AVJelSOLPON AV uaj!ll!W t~--- — — AV ua�II!W nyuaneH nyuaneH AVesouuaH —(� ` nyesouuaH 1 nV ple4!UwV — nV ple4!40JV AV uewllaH i C%ny uew118H r AV we OU!A IS ue!laweO j Y� ri7 flu r j v a g f e y c nyena�j g86i� y "J, 3 L 1 ,alfit lilt 1111 PP FE ms €r !° � ai ��yp zV tld[1d�llti Community Facilities District 2000-03A 4 FY2015/2016 P579 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVici-is GROUP RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 B (RANCHO SUMMIT), OPERATION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKWAYS. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 B (Rancho Summit). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay for the operation and maintenance of parks and parkways. The Official Statement, Appendix B, Section C Maximum Special Tax - Developed Property 1. (c) authorizes an annual increase. Rates have not been adjusted since 2008. At this time, a rate increase of 2.00% is necessary. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 16, 2000 the City Council approved Resolution No. 00-149 and established Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 B. On October 11, 2000 the qualified electors of the District, being the owners of the land within the District, voted to approve the levy of a special tax to pay for certain public services and the administering of such District. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax. The District was authorized to finance park improvements including clearing and grading of park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape landscaping of parks and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north; State Route (210) Freeway to the south; Interstate 15 Freeway to the east and East Avenue to the west. On each July 1, the Maximum Special Tax is increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), with a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) up to a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%). However, actual special taxes in this District have not been increased since 2008. At this time, in order to provide sufficient revenues to meet District expenses without adversely impacting maintenance, a rate increase to the Maximum Special Tax is required. This equates to a 2.00% increase from the prior year. P580 APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 B (RANCHO SUMMIT),OPERATION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKWAYS AuGus'r 6,2015 PAG[:2 Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P581 RESOLUTION NO. 15-130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "B" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 TO FINANCE THE OPERATION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF PARK AND PARKWAYS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) Special Tax "B" (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax "B" to be collected for Fiscal Year 2015-2016 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Annual status Report to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. P582 SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by the Ordinance, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of Special Tax"B"shall be used, in whole or in part, for the following: A. Payment of costs and expenses of the operation and maintenance of authorized parks and parkways and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; B. Payment of an amount necessary to fund or replenish an operating reserve for the costs of the operation of authorized parks and parkways; C. Payment of a proportionate share of Administrative Expenses as such tern is defined in the Modified Rate and Method The proceeds of Special Tax "B" shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: Special Tax "B" shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of Special Tax"B,"and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P583 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of July 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of July 2015. Executed this 15th day of July 2015, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P584 Resolution No. 15-130 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03B RANCHO SUMMIT ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2015 P585 Resolution No.15-130 BACKGROUND On August 16, 2000 City Council approved Resolution No. 00-149 and established Community Facilities District No. 2000-03; on October 11, 2000 the qualified electors of the District, being the owners of the land within the District, voted to approve the levy of a special tax to pay for certain public services and the administering of such District. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north; State Route (210) Freeway to the south; Interstate 15 Freeway to the east and East Avenue to the west. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 shall be assigned to a Zone and further classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non-Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11. On each July 1, the Maximum Special Tax B shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. However, the money collected at the current special tax rate along with a portion of fund balance will provide sufficient revenue to meet budgetary operations and maintenance expenses. Fiscal Maximum Actual Year CPI Rate Assessment Assessment per EBU per EBU 2006/07 $945.00 $945.00 2007/08 3.29% $976.09 $981.00 2008/09 4.17% $1,016.79 $1,000.62 2009/10 2.00% $1,037.13 $1,000.62 2010/11 2.00% $1,057.87 $1,000.62 2011/12 2.00% $1,079.03 $1,000.62 2012/13 2,17% $1,102.44 $1,000.62 2013/14 2.00% $1,124.49 $1,000.62 2014/15 2.00% $1,146.98 $1,146.98 2015/16 2,00% $1,169.92 $1,169.92 Community Facilities District 2000-03B I FY2015/2016 P586 Resolution No.15-130 FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD2000-03B RANCHO SUMMIT Land Use Description Residential Floor Area Assigned Special Classes Tax 1 - 10 Residential Property <1,850 Sq. Ft to =>3,450 Sq Ft $1'169'92 11 Non-Residential N/A $5,574 per Acre Property Community Facilities District 2000-03B 2 FY2015/2016 P587 Resolution No. 15-130 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: PERSONNEL SERVICES $200,020.00 CITY ADMINISTRATION, $ 60,990.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE $173,040.00 CONTRACT SERVICES $ 46,920.00 TRANSFER OUT - FUND 137 $ 50,000.00 $530,970.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 3,860.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 3,960.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCE $113,560.00 SPECIAL TAX $409,590.00 $530,970.00 Community Facilities District 2000-03B 3 FY2015/2016 P588 M d o = g O j N V a V 0 0 ZS �$ ny RuayO o 0 m o 6 m H a •� AV3Se3 in V I o ny epueMg3 r ny epueMly X L' � g Naw� ea EAVJalsa400a nVJa3s8yooa AV ua)l!!!!lN �. °° -- AV uaV.111W nyuaneH I _,U AVueneH I _ AV esouuaH i —( — AV esouuaH AV ple4!4yV AV pleQ!4wV AV uewllaH nV uewllaH AV pfeAaulA IS us!laweo nyenaE) m 05 V �� Plli;jV�ltt� U- L; dia�1l l:l�i Community Facilities District 2000-03B 4 FY2015/2016 P589 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVF SERVICES GROUP RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology / By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2, SERIES A), WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 & 2), Series 2001-A. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the special tax to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2), Series 2001-A authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,240,000. On August 15, 2001 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001 to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District, including improvements to Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Baseline Road and Arbor Way, landscaping improvements within public right-of-way, storm drain and flood control improvements. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $9,093,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2030-2031. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P590 RESOLUTION NO. 15-131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 (IMPROVEMENT AREAS NO. 1 & 2), SERIES 2001-A WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 Series 2001-A) (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P591 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P592 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of July, 2015. Executed this 15th day of July, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P593 Resolution No. 15-131 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 1 AND No. 2 SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2001-A ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2015 P594 Resolution No. 15-131 BACKGROUND On June 20, 2001, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,240,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The District is generally bordered on the north by Base Line Road, on the west by the Day Creek Flood Control Channel from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard and by the Southern California Edison right-of-way from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road, on the south by Interstate 15 and on the east by Etiwanda Avenue. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement . Area No. 2 shall be classified as Developed Property, Final Mapped Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, or Undeveloped Property, and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the sections below. The property in Improvement Area No. 1 is residential in use. The property in Improvement Area No. 2 is primarily commercial and contains Victoria Gardens. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $9,093,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2030-2031. Community Facilities District No. 2001-01A 1 FY2015/2016 P595 Resolution No. 15-131 FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 1 LAND USE RESIDENTIAL CLASS DESCRIPTION FLOOR AREA ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX 1 Single Family Property => 3,250 Sq Ft $1,269.30 Per Dwelling Unit 2 Single Family Property 2,950 toF3,249 Sq $1,017.86 Per Dwelling Unit 3 Single Family Property 2,650 to 2,949 Sq $915.71 Per Dwelling Unit Ft 4 Single Family Property 2,350 to 2,649 Sq $786.36 Per Dwelling Unit Ft 5 Single Family Property 2,150 to 2,349 Sq $676.36 Per Dwelling Unit Ft 6 Single Family Property 1,950 to 2,149 Sq $650.72 Per Dwelling Unit Ft 7 Single Family Property < 1,950 Sq Ft $566.95 Per Dwelling Unit 8 Apartment Property Not Applicable $143.25 Per Dwelling Unit 9 Non-Residential Not Applicable $3,572.13 Per Acre Property INTERMEDIATE SPECIAL TAX FOR FINAL MAPPED PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL INTERMEDIATE MAXIMUM DESCRIPTION FLOOR AREA SPECIAL TAX Residential Property Not Applicable $6,508.49 Per Acre Non-Residential Property Not Applicable $6,508.49 Per Acre Community Facilities District No.2001-0]A 2 FY2015/2016 P596 Resolution No. 15-131 CFD 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 2 LAND USE CLASS DESCRIPTION ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX 1 Apartment Property $143.25.00 Per Dwelling Unit 2 Other Residential Property $6,508.49 Per Acre 3 Non-Residential Property $0.36 Per SQ. FT. of Non- Residential Floor Area Community Facilities District No.2001-01A 3 FY2015/2016 P597 Resolution No.15-131 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $700,410.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 66,910.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 $768,820.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 0.00 OTHER REVENUE $ 0.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 1,800.00 TRANSFER IN FROM FUND BALANCE $ 12,040.00 SPECIAL TAX $754,980.00 $768,820.00 Community Facilities District No. 2001-01A 4 FY2015/2016 P598 Q O O W d N y •i � a � v ?' R e w. Q� v o k k y y ° AV/JD0140 Q N y d •`4�_./ � � J CO Y f m 8 cc L. �iAVise3 in LL ®- --- i y� IAV epueM43 Lam—'nV epueM!13 = I I 8 >aaD:) Aed _.-........_.- AVJalsayooa --_ _.. AV18lsayO08 U - AV uaM!II!W AV ua>NII!n AV uaneH - I i �AV uaneH AV esouliaH - - iAV esouuaH AV pleq!ypiV - — iAV ple4lyojV AV uewllaH i _- r��" AV ueWIIOH L � 3S ue tD I �AV pDeAau!A pawe� - - — - � t .1 D D7i{L. jji AVanOJO - U 11Fi�imill Community Facilities District No.2001-01 A 5 FY2015/2016 P599 STAFF REPORT - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 C;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technologyc _, By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst I II Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001-B WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No.3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the special tax to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No.3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $935,000. On August 15, 2001 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001 to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District, including improvements to Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Baseline Road and Arbor Way, landscaping improvements within public right-of-way, storm drain and flood control improvements. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $812,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2030-2031. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P600 RESOLUTION NO. 15-132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001-B WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3 Zone 7) Series 2001-B (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P601 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P602 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of July, 2015. Executed this 15th day of July, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P603 Resolution No. 15-132 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 3 SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2001-B ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2015 P604 Resolution No. 15-132 BACKGROUND On June 20, 2001, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $935,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The District is generally bordered on the north by Base Line Road, on the west by the Day Creek Flood Control Channel from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard and by the Southern California Edison right-of-way from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road, on the south by Interstate 15 and on the east by Etiwanda Avenue. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within each Zone of Improvement Area No. 3 shall be classified as Taxable or Non-Taxable Property and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the section below. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $812,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2030-2031. FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 3 TAXABLE ACREAGE BOND SHARE MAXIMUM TAX PER ACRE ZONE 1-FUTURE RDA 55.00 91.70% $15,230.37 ZONE 7-LEGGIO 42.74 8.30% $1,750.00 Community Facilities District No.2001-OIB l FY2015/2016 P605 Resolution No.15-132 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $64,730.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 30.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 0.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 0.00 $64,760.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 0.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCES $ 0.00 OTHER REVENUE $ 0.00 SPECIAL TAX $65,590.00 $65,590.00 Community Facilities District No. 2001-01B 2 FY2015/2016 P606 .• CO O _ M O 00 W N N W V q Y L t► a r e y �� nV�a4o 0 tM ('U� N ) tiFU LL � � R � o VJ i r J m M ee� =` 2 y I � AV P83 y� IAV epuemg3� - - — — _.. AV wuw*m g „aaJO AEC] Q AV,salsa OON AWQatPo2J U r AV uaX!II!W r•----!.... . — __. ._— '-- - AV Loan I AV uaneH ___ � �AV uaneH AV esourlaH I - - AV esouuaH I1 i AV pleQ!4�V 1 - AV PIeQ!LPJV AV uewpaH _ -- — - - U)AV uewllaH L O yl lD r�U11.1t: l 3S ue!Iaw AV W"'A i eD _ t '_' t t #� +l At AV anoJO N c m Y V1 . fit r rn m a � °° Ii,�a�tli t ai �g1l Community Facilities District No.2001-OIB 3 FY2015/2016 P607 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager ZALL From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ZONES 1, 2 & 3, SERIES 2003-A) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 Zones 1, 2 & 3), Series 2003-A. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for FY 2015-2016. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1), Series 2003-A authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of$14,645,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax, and on May 21, 2003 approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 147 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 1 (Zones 1, 2 & 3). The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church Street, north of Arrow Route and east of the Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow Route north, to Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard north, to Church Street. The District is located within the Victoria Planned Community. Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003 to share in the provision of funds for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) along with a cultural center owned by the City, including a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. On July 03, 2013 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-110 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 in the principal amount of $14,170,000 were issued on July 30, 2013. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2033-2034. P6O8 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL.TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ZONES 1, 2 & 3, SERIES 2003-A) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. JULY 15,2015 PACE 2 Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P609 RESOLUTION NO. 15-133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ZONES 1, 2 & 3) SERIES 2003-A WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 Zones 1, 2 & 3) Series 2003-A (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. P610 SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked 'public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P611 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of July, 2015. Executed this 15th day of July, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P612 Resolution No. 15-133 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 1 SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2003-A ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2015 P613 Resolution No. 15-133 BACKGROUND On February 19, 2003, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01, Improvement Area No.1 (IA No. 1) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $16,000,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), along with a cultural center owned by the City, including a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. The District is generally bordered on the north by Church Street, on the east by Interstate 15, on the south by Arrow Route and on the west by the a Southern California Edison easement from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard and by Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard to Church Street. On July 30, 2013 CFD 2003-01, Improvement Area No. 1(IA No.1) was refinanced for a total of$14,170,000. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the sections below. FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD2003-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 1 ASSIGNED BACKUP SPECIAL NOTE SPECIAL TAX TAX — ZONE 1 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and PROPERTY $5,368.89/ACRE $5,965.71/ACRE Backup can increase 2% every year ZONE 1 UNDEVELOPED $5,965.71/ACRE $6,085.02/ACRE Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY every year ZONE 2 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and PROPERTY $45,127.03/ACRE $50,141.56/ACRE Backup can increase 2% every year ZONE 2 UNDEVELOPED $15,936.33/ACRE $16,255.05/ACRE Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY every year ZONE 3 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and PROPERTY $12,771.94ACRE $14,190.63/ACRE Backup can increase 2% every year ZONE 3 UNDEVELOPED $14,190.63/ACRE $14,474.44IACRE Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY every year Community Facilities District No.2003-01 A 1 FY2015/2016 P614 Resolution No.15-133 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $ 971,430.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 53,850.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0.00 $ 1,026,780.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 2,890.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 450.00 TRANSFER IN FROM BALANCE $ 30,540.00 SPECIAL TAX $ 992,900.00 $ 1,026,780.00 Community Facilities District No.2003-OIA 2 FY2015/2016 P615 1 n � Cq Q O O W A A A O N � CM y y U, q co AV AU040 st U N 0 C _ v ® AVPU3 in i ny epuemg3 'ny epuenn!l3 C � Is 49e13 Aea 7yM���wl� nyiauayooa nVielsayootl AV uatl!II!W �� tnV uB�II!W nV ueneH ny uaneH AV esouuaH AV esouuaH AV PIBQ!WiV nV Ple4!tpV AV uswllaH ny uewIIBH � a IS ue!laweo AV{ueRau!A 1 ,{a AVGAQJO !A m h Hill tl�a} �� CO L81 H. i Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 A 3 FY2015/2016 P616 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ZONES 1 & 2, SERIES 2003-B) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2 Zones 1 & 2), Series 2003-B. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for FY 2015-2016. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2), Series 2003-B authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,855,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax, and on May 21, 2003 approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 82 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 2 (Zones 1 & 2). The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church Street, north of Arrow Route and east of Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow Route north, to Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard north, to Church Street. The District is located within the Victoria Planned Community. Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003 to share in the provision of funds for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) along with a cultural center owned by the City, including a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. On September 17, 2013 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-162 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 in the principal amount of $2,784,000 were issued on September 30, 2013. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2033-2034. P617 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ZONES I &2,SERIES 2003-13) W f-I NO INCREASE-TO TI-IG CURRENT RATE JULY 15,2015 PAGii 2 This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P618 RESOLUTION NO. 15-134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ZONES 1 & 2), SERIES 2003-B WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2 Zones 1 & 2), Series 2003-B) (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. P619 SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P620 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of July, 2015. Executed this 15th day of July, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P621 Resolution No. 15-134 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 2 SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2003-B ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2015 P622 Resolution No. 15-134 BACKGROUND On February 19, 2003, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2003-01, Improvement Area No. 2 (IA No. 2) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,855,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) along with a cultural center owned by the City, including a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. The District is generally bordered on the north by Church Street, on the east by Interstate 15, on the south by Arrow Route and on the west by the a Southern California Edison easement from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard and by Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard to Church Street. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD2003-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 2 ASSIGNED BACKUP SPECIAL NOTE SPECIAL TAX TAX ZONE 1 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and Backup PROPERTY $3,480.20/ACRE $3,866.89/ACRE can increase 2% every year ZONE 1 UNDEVELOPED $3,866.89/ACRE $3,944.22/ACRE Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY every year ZONE 2 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and Backup PROPERTY $10,543.81/ACRE $10,754.68/ACRE can increase 2% every year ZONE 2 UNDEVELOPED $11,716.32IACRE $11,950.64/ACRE Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY every year Community Facilities District No. 2003-01B I FY2015/2016 P623 Resolution No.15-134 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $ 175,050.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 15,380.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0.00 $ 191,930.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 1,590.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 0.00 TRANSFER IN FROM FUND BALANCE $ 0.00 SPECIAL TAX $ 199,150.00 $ 200,740.00 Community Facilities District No.2003-01 B 2 FY2015/2016 P624 M t 41 >` ci CA 01 03 0 iL a� a 0 a .10 � C'M AV IRM o I U �O„ _ ny tsey cn 1 �ptwmg3i �"'1 r r eo eu:q 03 lead a O AV Alaaoa O (� v. A:; Uaa v, t AV 6-OA%4 AV L40%%4 rssowx♦, AV esouuaµ AwNwitwo3e — Avares 0 , AV UB W114H -- AV UvUAI*4 1 � AV ae+yw, 1!ull�rjl LS �laUM - — I I Ili A#QA0/1J �t• �•I! i LO LL VIA v y i t:t t,�ll p • = li itl� I�t Community Facilities District No.2003-01B 3 FY2015/2016 P625 STAFF REPORT - ADMINISIRATIVE SERVICES GROUP RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) WITH NO INCREASE IN CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for FY 2015-2016. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On September 15, 2004 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $45,000,000. On October 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 735 approving the levy of the special tax, and on June 7, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06-185 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on July 13, 2006 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and construction of certain public facilities, to serve property located within the District. The District was authorized to finance the following improvements: (a) Day Creek Boulevard - grading, storm drain, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping; (b) Etiwanda Avenue - grading, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping; (c) Cucamonga Valley Water District ("CVWD") reservoir transmission main; (d) storm drain facilities including the northern property line storm drain and the Etiwanda Avenue storm drain; (e) park facilities; (f) equestrian facilities; (g) school facilities now owned by the Etiwanda School District and by the Chaffey Joint Union High School District; (h) water and sewer facilities now owned by CVWD which were authorized and financed from the proceeds of capacity charges levied by CVWD; (i) flood control facilities now owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District; and 0) open space also now owned by the County of San Bernardino. On January 15, 2014 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-005 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 in the principal amount of $34,384,000 were issued on February 07, 2014. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2036-2037. P626 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 200401 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES). JULY 15,2015 PAC[:2 Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P627 RESOLUTION NO. 15-135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P628 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P629 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15'h day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of July, 2015. Executed this 15`h day of July, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P630 Resolution No. 15-135 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2015 P631 Resolution No. 15-135 BACKGROUND On September 2004, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $45,000,000 to pay the costs of issuing the bonds; fund the Reserve Fund for the Bonds and capitalized interest through September 1, 2006; the acquisition and construction of school facilities to be owned by Etiwanda and Chaffey Joint Union High School Districts; flood control facilities to be owned by San Bernardino County Flood Control District; open space to be owned by the County of San Bernardino; park and equestrian facilities; water and sewer facilities to be owned by Cucamonga Valley Water District; and the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Day Creek Boulevard, and Etiwanda Avenue; such street improvements to include but not to be limited to: grading, storm drain, sewer, water, dry utilities and landscaping. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax shall be levied for a period not to exceed fifty years commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-06, provided however that Special Taxes will cease to be levied in an earlier Fiscal Year if the CFD Administrator has determined (i) that all required interest and principal payments on the CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds have been paid; and (ii) all Authorized Facilities have been constructed. On January 15, 2014 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-005 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 in the principal amount not to exceed $37,000,000 were issued on February 7, 2014. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2035-2036. Community Facilities District No.2004-01 1 FY2015/2016 P632 Resolution No. 15-135 FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 Land Use Developed Floor Maximum Category Area Special Tax 1 - Residential Property Greater 4,000 sq ft $5,555 per unit 2 - Residential Property 3801 - 4000 sq ft $5,325 per unit 3 - Residential Property 3601 - 3800 sq ft $5,151 per unit 4 - Residential Property 3400 - 3600 sq ft $4,896 per unit 5 - Residential Property Less than 3400 sq ft $4,410 per unit 6 - Non-Residential Property NA $19,813 per acre Land Use Developed Floor Actual Special Category Area Tax 1 - Residential Property Greater 4,000 sq ft $5,118 per unit 2 - Residential Property 3801 - 4000 sq ft $4,906 per unit 3 - Residential Property 3601 - 3800 sq ft $4,746 per unit 4 - Residential Property 3400 - 3600 sq ft $4,511 per unit 5 - Residential Property Less than 3400 sq ft $4,063 per unit 6 - Non-Residential Property NA $0.00 per acre Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 2 FY2015/2016 P633 Resolution No. 15-135 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $ 2,354,230.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 43,540.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0.00 $ 2,399,270.00 SOURCES: DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 23,500.00 INTEREST REVENUE $ 10,990.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCES $ 37,660.00 SPECIAL TAX $ 2,327,120.00 $ 2,399,270.00 Community Facilities District No.2004-01 3 FY2015/2016 P634 t. v N o +.. < c 0 0 V � o yny duay0 o IIgj m � N Ir C2 g p AV JSB3 r75 SS LL I 1 uemg3 AV epuemy3 AV ia{sayooa i - Ayielsay�oa O AV uaIllpW � AV W'4.lit W AV uaneH - AruaneH AV esouuaH -._ eremWJaH AV plogLpiV - nYPle4lyojV AV uewllaH I --- ✓'�AV uewllaH AV AVAauln IS uellaweo - - ..� `E 4 rj nyanaD m �lIE�IE�j�fi Community Facilities District No.2004-01 4 FY2015/2016 P635 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRAT1 V E SERVICES GROUP RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 C;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate for FY 2015-2016. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $5,800,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 769 approving the levy of the special tax, and on December 20, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06- 401 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Center Street, north of 261" Street and west of Haven Avenue. Bonds were issued on January 25, 2007 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and of street improvements, landscape improvements within the public right-of-way, and water and sewer improvements. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P636 RESOLUTION NO. 15-136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P637 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P638 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of July, 2015. Executed this 15th day of July, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P639 Resolution No. 15-136 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2015 P640 Resolution No. 15-136 BACKGROUND On October 18, 2006, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2006-01 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $5,800,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of street improvements, landscaping improvements located in public right-of-way, fee related improvements such as transportation, beautification, parks and recreation and drainage, water capacity, water meter and sewer connection fees and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The District is located south of Arrow Route, east of Center Avenue, north of 26th Street and west of Haven Avenue Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2006-01 shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the section below. FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE Floor Plan Home Size SQ. FT. Number of Units Special Tax Tri-Plex Plan 1 1335 26 $ 2,324.00 Tri-Plex Plan 2 1803 26 $ 2,678.00 Tri-Plex Plan 3 1920 26 $ 2,774.00 SFD Plan 4 2188 28 $ 3,109.00 SFD Plan 5 2627 28 $ 3,379.00 SFD Plan 6 3173 22 $ 3,687.00 156 Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 I FY2015/2016 P641 Resolution No. 15-136 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $375,740.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 27,990.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1.500.00 $405,230.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 6,690.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 2,500.00 TRANSFER IN FROM FUND BALANCE $ 0.00 SPECIAL TAX $458,610.00 $467,800.00 Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 2 FY2015/2016 P642 E ED F _m 0 f� � 9 N o U c � 0 y nV Auayo J o i m o Ex 8 V U- cc u �t v AV epuamg3 r AV epuemp3 �9>laei� eQ yW AVJBIsatpoa� - nVJaOSaLPON U �^ AV ua>Igllw nV ua)Ull!W AV uaneH - �nV uGAeH I AV esouuaH (�I AV BsouuaH nV pleq!tW V I AV PIBgILPJV AV uewIIBH i C m AV uewllaH I z is AV p�eAau!n 1S uegawep fluE#;1�:�, ` '`1 e —y m _r nyanwD 1 o g i m 8 (ts#rli1 #� E Jig Y. fid 4f tZ#� Community Facilities District No.2006-01 3 FY2015/2016 P643 STAFF REPORT ADMINIS"1'RA'rivE SERVICES GROUP RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III d�Y' Subject: CONSIDERTION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate for FY 2015-2016. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,980,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 770 approving the levy of the special tax, and on December 20, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06- 402 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located south of Garcia Drive, east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of East Avenue. Bonds were issued on January 25, 2007 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition of street improvements, landscape improvements within the public right-of-way, and water and sewer improvements. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P644 RESOLUTION NO. 15-137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P645 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P646 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15`h day of July, 2015. Executed this 15th day of July, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P647 Resolution No. 15-137 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 AMADOR ON ROUTE 66 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2015 P648 Resolution No. 15-137 BACKGROUND On October 18, 2006, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2006-02 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $2,980,000 to provide financing for a portion of the cost of for the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of street and transportation, landscaping, dry utilities, parks and recreation, drainage, water and sewer in addition to the engineering, design, planning, permitting and construction, coordination, together with other incidental costs. The District is located south of Garcia Drive, east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of East Avenue. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2006-02 shall be classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the section below. FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD 2006-02 AMADOR ON ROUTE 66 Land Use Residential Floor Maximum # of Class Description Area Special Tax Units 1 Single Family < 1,850 Sq. Ft. $2,816 per unit 33 Detached Property 2 Single Family 1,601 - 1,850 Sq. $2,697 per unit 33 Detached Property Ft. 3 Single Family 1,351 - 1,600 Sq. $2,469 per unit 0 Detached Property Ft. 4 Single Family >1,351 Sq. Ft. $2,241 per unit 33 Detached Property 5 Non-Residential N/A $64,747 per acre 0 Property Community Facilities District No.2006-02 I FY2015/2016 P649 Resolution No. 15-137 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $195,310.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 27,850.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 $224,660.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 3,680.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 12,500.00 SPECIAL TAX $251,790.00 $267,970.00 Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 2 FY2015/2016 P650 N d N CD O N o U ® in (� o H }� nV Au040 i 8 tj ' ® '�'^AV ISe3 in LL _ ■ I Q 'AV epuetng3 t ny epuenut3 �9 tlaai� e�Q AVia3SO4Po21 ! I nViatsatpoa O I AV UaPm!w — — AV ua)enlw 0 AVuaneH i 'nyuaneH ny esouuaH ( F AV esotwaH nV pleq!4oiV nV pleq!4wV AV uewllaH I AV uewllaH I � AV pieAau!A flu III !I tg ue!aui - loll —.J..� nyanotO t m 25 Syr �it �r�j,M.113 11 N ED J t 15 � X1'.7 ilu ill Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 3 FY2015/2016 P651 STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: July 15, 2015 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Kenneth Fung, Assistant Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEDIA SYSTEMS REVITALIZATION PROJECT, CO 14-214, AS COMPLETE,APPROVE A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AUTHORIZE THE RELEASE OF THE RETENTION 35 DAYS AFTER ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $273,433.15 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the City Council Chambers Media Systems Revitalization Project, CO 14-214, as complete; approve a resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion; authorize the release of the retention in the amount of$27,343.31, 35 days after acceptance; and approve the final contract amount of$273,433.15. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Phase one of the "City Council Chambers Media Systems Revitalization" project included the following highlights: • New camera lighting for the dais • New microphones • New audio and video monitors on the dais for the Council members • New flat panel monitors for the audience • New speakers throughout the chambers • All new cabling and wiring • Replacement of all live broadcast audio/video mixing and production equipment Pertinent information of the project is as follows: ➢ Budgeted Amount: $324,000 ➢ Account Numbers: 1025001-5602 3288501-5602 ➢ Engineer's Estimate: $270,000 ➢ RFP 14/15-101 posted to bid system: August 7, 2014 ➢ Proposal Due Date: August 27, 2014 P652 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEDIA SYSTEMS REVITALIZATION PROJECT NOTICE OF COMPLETION JULY 15,2015 PAGE 2 ➢ Contract Award Date: September 17, 2014 D Low Bidder: Spinitar of La Mirada ➢ Contract Amount: $270,000 ➢ 15% Contingency: $54,000 ➢ Final Contract Amount: $273,433.15 ➢ Difference in Contract Amount: $3,433.15 (0.01%) The net increase in total cost of the project was the result of a series of eleven (11) deductive and additive Contract Change Orders. These contract change orders increased the compatibility of the new media systems to the existing media systems. Respectfull submitted, William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director Attachments P653 RESOLUTION NO. 15-138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEDIA REVITALIZATION PROJECT, CO 14-214, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the City Council Chambers Media Revitalization Project, CO 14-214, has been completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the Public Works Services Director is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P654 STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Kenneth Fung, Assistant Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE CIVIC CENTER — PARKING LOT LIGHTING PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 15-036 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND; ACCEPT A MAINTENACE BOND; AUTHORIZE THE RELEASE OF THE LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND; APPROVE A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, RELEASE THE RETENTION 35 DAYS AFTER ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $93,688 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Civic Center — Parking Lot Lighting Project, Contract No. 15-036, as complete, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $93,688 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received, authorize the release of the retention in the amount of$4,684.40, 35 days after acceptance; and approve the final contract amount of$93,688. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director. The Civic Center — Parking Lot Lighting Project scope of work consisted of the removal and replacement of existing High Intensity Discharge (HID) lighting fixtures in the north employee parking lot, the public parking deck and the south employee parking lot (also known as the east lot) with new LED fixtures. This project also replaced the existing roof fixtures with new LED fixtures. Finally, this project demolished the existing up light fixtures along the sidewalk on the north side of Civic Center Drive and replaced them with new pole mounted LED walkway lights. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: ➢ Budgeted Amount: $170,500 ➢ Account Numbers: 1025001-5607/0-6969 1706303-5209/0-6969 Engineer's Estimate: $155,000 City Council Approval to Advertise: November 5, 2014 P655 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT LIGHTING PROJECT NOTICE OF COMPLETION JULY 15, 2015 PAGE 2 ➢ Publish dates for local paper: November 11, 2014 November 18, 2014 Bid Opening: December 16, 2014 9 Contract Award Date: February 4, 2014 Low Bidder: S & Sons Electrical Contractors Corporation of Hesperia Contract Amount: $93,688 10% Contingency: $9,368.80 ➢ Final Contract Amount: $93,688 Difference in Contract Amount: $0.00 (0.00%) No contract change orders were needed for this project. Respectfully submitted, William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director Attachment P656 RESOLUTION NO. 15-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CIVIC CENTER — PARKING LOT LIGHTING PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 15-036 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Civic Center — Parking Lot Lighting Project, Contract No. 15-036, has been completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the Public Works Services Director is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P657 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP WI'MENT RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Principal Civil Enginee Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION FOR RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 2175707-M IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,285.35, FOR THE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS AT 9TH STREET FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO OLD SPUR TRACK AND BAKER AVENUE FROM 8TH STREET TO 9TH STREET PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 14-011 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 2175707-M in the amount of$15,285.35, for the Sidewalk Improvements at gth Street from Hellman Avenue to Old Spur Track and Baker Avenue from Bch Street to 911 Street project, Contract No. 14-011. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Golden State Constructors, Inc. 208 E. Orangethorpe Avenue Placentia, CA 91729 Respectfully submitted, Mark A. teuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD/SH:ls P658 .JIM2+R_FL Hq�sr ' < C>yNNCL i 1l HILLSIDE R0. < ipp ❑❑ VILSN AVE. 1 w LI W E V Y BANYAN ST. NIGKMD AVL ❑ NIGHLaNO AVE❑I LU 1 I9th ST. t 19th T. NIF WJ =� n Tl VI T ST. TE FISTA ST. Q H FAIRMOMT UPLAND pBJ � � < BASELNE AVE BAS L ` w c W q J 1St' PKVY i w Q a > > V N W Y S CHURCH ST. x Jm p MLL �a SAN BER , _RD u FDDTHILL BLVD �W 66 > }I � �- VoH B ®gd_O III aRRDV LE �❑ 9th ST. a ------E❑EI JERSEY BLVD a W Bt TR CT 1 STREET I I a j < a q 7th STREET 6th Y STREET W PROJECT LOCATION4th STREET �°� ® ONTARIO F30 FREEVAY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9TH ST. (SPUR TO HELLMAN AVE.) & BAKER AVE. (8TH ST. TO 9TH ST.) n.ia P659 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARA"NIIENT t RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineerin/g��Seervices/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Principal Civil EngineerCf�' Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer 4 Subject: CONSIDERATION FOR RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 024049290 IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,136.31, FOR THE CENTRAL PARK PAVILION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 13-146 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 024049290 in the amount of$26,136.31, for the Central Park Pavilion Project, Contract No. 13-146. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: AToM Engineering Construction, Inc. 40410 Vista Road Hemet, CA 92544 Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD/SH:Is tr..� ,r. ��„r2 .:•� � :�^ d�: � - ,. d*r.a.:.,r �.�,�.. p ,� ^�r-.r .� ,�`�°.� F,,," ' L� �`z :; . _� ,,. •A�� n {° f ""^ 'fir — / �„n rt , F. Trr 4V Proposed OutdoorI ''�+ Activity Pavilion Site-. , 40 a i c 11 t�y " $ # r L' p°. Of.��• ##to bl �rb tT�a I P661 STAFF REPORT ENGIIN[.ERINC. SPiwicrs DrPAR'1* u:!:NT RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineer .4f Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineers Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE BASE LINE ROAD AT 1-15 FREEWAY UTILITY UNDERGROUND PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 14-118 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND, AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $459,471.92 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Utility Underground project, Contract No. 14-118, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $427,242.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $xx 35 days after acceptance. Also approve the final contract amount of $459,471.92. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Utility Underground project scope of work consisted of conversion of overhead electrical system facilities to underground and providing temporary electrical system facilities to existing structures prior to and during the construction of the Base Line at 1-15 Interchange Improvement project. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: Budgeted Amount: $469,966.20 Account Numbers: 11124303-5650/1848124-0 and 1198303-5650/1848198-0 ➢ City Council Approval to Advertise: February 19, 2014 ➢ Publish dates for local paper: March 4 and 11, 2014 9 Bid Opening: April 1, 2014 Contract Award Date: May 7, 2014 P662 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: BASE LINE ROAD AT 1-15 FREEWAY UTILITY UNDERGROUND PROJECT JULY 15, 2015 PAGE 2 Low Bidder: Herman Weissker Inc. Contract Amount: $427,242.00 ➢ Contingency: $42,724.20 Final Contract Amount: $459,471.92 Difference in Contract Amount: $32,229.92 (7.54%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of six (6) Contract Change Orders. The notable changes significant to the increase of the Contract amount were the extra work for removal of 125' of abandoned storm drain; widen the trench for installation of SCE ducts; place and remove traffic control during the traffic loop placement; place barrier posts around a vault; construct a retaining wall not shown on the plans; stand-by time delays caused by SANBAG's contractor, place barriers posts around an electrical pedestal; and reimburse contractor for Caltrans permit fees. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/C B/SH:ls Attachment P663 1 ALIVC 1 D 5T ( I I 1 �u.MILL5IDE 1 1 IL50 AVE 1 24TH 5T I 1 1 G� BANYAN T N ❑ _ I BANYAN 5T _ BASEL E z nuRC sr V 1 � s PROJECT F HILL BLVD = ¢ F THI LVO LOCATION Q w 10500 C LINTER ua > > (> K r K � Q w BNSF RR BTH 5T = 6TH 5T r 4TH5T ONTARIO CITY LIMIT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BASE LINE ROAD AT I-15 FREEWAY UTnlTY UNDERGROUND PROJECT VICINITY MAP riTs P664 RESOLUTION NO. 15-140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BASE LINE ROAD AT 1-15 FREEWAY UTILITY UNDERGROUND PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 14-118, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Utility Underground project Contract No. 14-118, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. RESOLUTION NO. 15-140— Page 1 of 1 P665 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 15, 2015 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jason C. Welday, Traffic Engineer Jarrod L. Alexander, Engineering Technician Subject: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 07 RENEWING THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH A FEE INCREASE FOR ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. (CO#13-150) FOR PROFESSIONAL CROSSING GUARD SERVICES, IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $435,000.00. TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 10187015300 (CONTRACT SERVICES FY 2015-16) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 07, which renews the Professional Services Agreements for Professional Crossing Guard Services, (CO#13-150). The renewal will provide a fee increase agreed upon by both vendor and City staff. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City has completed the fifth year of our annual "Professional Crossing Guard Services" contract with All City Management Services, Inc. All-City Management has been determined to be a Sole Source provider of the required services. The current contract was competitively bid in 2011 and provided for yearly extensions (for a maximum of 7 years) based on acceptable performance. This company has provided good service and in a timely manner. Also, staff is satisfied with the quality of their work. All-City Management Services, Inc. has indicated their willingness to continue providing services for fiscal year 2015/2016 with a fee increase of$1.38 per hour for personnel to compensate'for a required State of California Prevailing Wage increase and cost increases for AB1522 (sick time for part time employees). This agreement will be reviewed again next year. Respectful) submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JCW/JLA:ls P666 STAFF REPORT LNGINFERING SFiwicis DiTARA'MENT Date: July 15, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A REVISED DRAINAGE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT, DRA-43, FOR A LOCAL DRAINAGE FACILITY CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 17651 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET EAST OF EAST AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY K. HOVNANIAN HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the subject reimbursement agreement for local drainage facility construction in conjunction with the development of Tract 17651, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement, and releasing the previously recorded reimbursement agreement. City Clerk shall cause both resolutions to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On April 1, 2015, the City Council approved Drainage Reimbursement Agreement DRA-43. Subsequently a miscalculation in the cost allocations was brought to our attention by one of the affected benefit parcel owners. The net results of this revision is that the affected parcel owners will be obligated to pay 18.6% less than the original calculations. As a Condition of Approval of Tract Map 17651 the Developer, K. Hovnanian Homes, was required to construct a local storm drain (Line A per Drawing 2219) from the tract to an existing channel along the north side of the 210 Freeway right-of-way, referred to in the attached document as "Etiwanda Area Storm Drain System Line 2-1". The required public improvements have been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides that, when a developer in the City is required as a condition of approval of a development to construct a public facility that is determined by the City to be oversized in excess of the requirement for the proposed development, the developer shall be offered a reimbursement agreement from future development within the local drainage area. Exhibit "B" in the attached document shows the tributary area that Line A was designed to accommodate. The Developer submitted an itemized accounting of the construction costs of the required public storm drain and related improvements for Storm Drain Line A from Etiwanda Area Storm Drain System Line 2-1 to Gypsum Drive. City Staff has reviewed the cost data and determined the total cost of the improvements is $286,457.00, with $170,025.92 (revised amount) to be reimbursed by adjacent developers and property owners upon development of their respective properties. Copies of the revised agreement are available in the City Clerk's office. P667 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT - REVISED DRAINAGE REIMBURSEMENT, DRA-43 July 15, 2015 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, � t/... Zre uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/BM:Is Attachment P668 Map of Benefitting Properties East Avenue v Banyan Street � 32 37 v`! J ca 31, PJ 31 TT IN J - {� 17 1B LO s 09 FT TM T1 651 7 L 75 p TM so I it 7 F3 27 z$ 1 r.. � zm r, _ H3 L TT 18717 1 i8f2E I 7 LOTS , ioao rt � nziwe�' 'vlirsna�c«ao .p East Avenue ^ I-210 Freeway ---- —-riz.l Bunk ReeA L rNC A P669 RESOLUTION NO. 15-141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LOCAL DRAINAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LINE A SOUTH OF TRACT 17651 BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM LINE 2-1 AND GYPSUM DRIVE, DRA-43 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a revised Reimbursement Agreement (DRA-43) submitted by K. Hovnanian as developer of Tract 17651 for construction of a local storm drain from the tract to an existing channel along the north side of the 210 Freeway right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the Developer, at Developer's expense, has completed the required storm drain and related improvements. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES THAT said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest hereto and cause said agreement to record. RESOLUTION NO. 15-141 — Page 1 of 1 P670 RESOLUTION NO. 15-142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING THE LISTED BENEFIT PARCELS FROM THE PREVIOUS REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LOCAL DRAINAGE FACILITY CONSTRUCTION IN THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE AREA 5 FOR TRACT 17651, DRA-43 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 15-045, on April 1, 2015, approving Drainage Reimbursement Agreement DRA-43 for Tract 17651; and WHEREAS, said Drainage Reimbursement Agreement was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on April 27, 2015, as Document No. 2015-0169646; and WHEREAS, said Drainage Reimbursement Agreement was found to contain a miscalculation in the fair share calculations for benefit parcels; and WHEREAS, said Drainage Reimbursement Agreement will be replaced with a revised Drainage Reimbursement Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Drainage Reimbursement Agreement from the listed benefit parcels: APN 0225-191-03, 0225-191-04, 0225-191-06, 0225-191-09, 0225-191-10, 0225- 191-15, 0225-191-16, 0225-191-17, 0225-191-20, 0225-191-23, 0225-191-24, 0225-191-25, 0225-191-26, 0225-191-27, 0225-191-28, 0225-191-29, 0225-191-30, 0225-191-31, 0225-191- 32, 0225-191-36, 0225-191-37, 0226-102-03 and 0226-102-04, authorizes the Mayor to sign a Notice of Release of Lien and directs the City Clerk to record the Notice of Release of Lien in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. RESOLUTION NO. 15-142 — Page 1 of 1 P671 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT DATE: July 15, 2015 RANCHO TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John Gillison, City Manager FROM: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LOCAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT 18960 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY WILSON ESTATES, LLC RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Tentative Tract Map 18960, located on the north side of Wilson Avenue west of Etiwanda Avenue, is currently going through the entitlement process. Before they can develop the property as single family residential lots, an interim basin that is no longer needed has to be filled. In order to fill the basin, the developer must first complete the missing portion of an existing storm drain to channel connection along the northwest boundary of Lot B of Tract 13527 and replace the existing basin outlet with a lateral to Wilson Avenue for the future cul-de-sac. The Developer, Wilson Estates, LLC, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the local storm drain improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $113,100.00 Labor and Material Bond: $113,100.00 Copies of the agreement are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectf submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/rlf o moo -121191gjpovp00000aool G �O 199116 QGmGGGOGO Q `-ice – o �eaecaooc - ba©00000q;��p - amm����p.� a Iep v°'��° say 4----�,►'�,,�a' .. \ u��� ��I 5` 1�100m� i a YYY�VV111 111TTT"GGG,,��'� i • � ` Efo. pOC G1o000GGLG, r ii iii 00. ��1 1 '�i�1111♦♦,�17������� ' O '� ��:11111 �� ■► ♦ ♦ ♦ , .. ........ o ��L ,111111■ . .��. . X11,_ 1111111 0��11 .111111, 1►►1 :111■ 'FARE .\ 111 Qp BE lingo no won on 111 111.• „W �IIIIIIIIId 1111111111111111►\ 111111111/1 '111111 IIIIIi1/� � ��� � � ���■ i�11■ ■■■■■■ ■r"iu■ ■■■■■1u/ . i �� �■ INS 1,7111111111 11111111111111 11111111/ � ♦ �� 111111111 : : ►.111111111•♦ -►11111 IIIIIIIINu11 ►V1111IIII/ : 1111111111r/I ■1111 111. ': ■■■■ ■■■■■■■■�I—■■ X111111111■ - ij � - ri11111 111■\ \71111111111 � , � • - iii 11.111■■ � -� � . ' - \111. ��j��\111111111111 ■■ ■�,■ ■ p 1111 : ■r►ten 11.1.1111 �■ ■� �■ ' ■ • p IIIIIIINI � : 1,�■ j1■1■111I �■ ■■ �■ ■ • _ 1111111111 C � ■rte ■■■1111■111 �� 0■ �� � .. 1111111111 — � ■�C ■..■111111■ �,, ■�,. � � e* • �IIII 11111■� C 11�i■u�_I';11`=�„ IS ■■,= � � P673 RESOLUTION NO. 15-143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR LOCAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT 18960 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map number 18960, consisting of 12 proposed lots, located, on the north side of Wilson Avenue west of Etiwanda Avenue, is currently going through the entitlement process; and WHEREAS, before the property can be developed an interim basin that is no longer needed has to be filled; and WHEREAS, before the basin can be filled, the missing portion of an existing storm drain to channel connection must be completed and the existing basin outlet replaced with a lateral to Wilson Avenue for the future cul-de-sac; and WHEREAS, Wilson Estates, LLC, as developer, has entered into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security to complete the necessary prerequisite local storm drain improvements. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES THAT said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest. RESOLUTION NO. 15-143 - Page 1 of 1 �P674 STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERPICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 15, 2015 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager . From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director By: Christen Mitchell, Management Analyst II u ` Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE REQUEST TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT SERVICES CONDUCTED BY RJM DESIGN GROUP, INC. FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY SPORTS CENTER REPLACEMENT PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,170,971.75 PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $117,097.18 FOR A TOTAL OF $1,288,068.93 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 1120401- 5650/1896120-0. RECOMMENDATION Consideration of the request to approve an agreement for design development and construction document services conducted by RJM Design Group, Inc. for the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center Replacement project in the amount of $1,170,971.75 plus a 10% contingency in the amount of $117,097.18 for a total of $1,288,068.93 to be funded from account 1120401- 5650/1896120-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In response to the City Council's 2014 and 2015 goals of establishing a prioritized list of potential options for the replacement of the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center, because the 20 year lease expires in December 2017, a special City Council Study Session was held on May 20, 2015. Staff presented a report covering the analysis completed and options explored recommending the construction of a gymnasium at the Epicenter Adult Sports Park, Parking Lot G. City Council directed staff to move forward with the project as presented. The proposed conceptual design is based off of a gymnasium that had been previously designed by RJM Design Group, Inc. for the City, but not constructed. As the Architect of Record, RJM has submitted a proposal for professional design services for the project. The scope of work for the agreement encompasses project initiation, schematic design, design development, construction documents and assistance during the bidding process and throughout construction. Construction is scheduled to begin in Fall 2016 with completion anticipated in late 2017. Respectfully submitted, Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director �P675 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTR. TIFF SERVICES GROUP J� RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager Anthony Ortega, Administrative Intern Subject: CONSIDERATION TO JOIN THE INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL BROADBAND CONSORTIUM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve joining Inland Empire Regional Broadband Consortium. BACKGROUND The City of Rancho Cucamonga has had an interest in the development of broadband infrastructure for many years. The City maintains its own fiber optic network linking most city facilities, and will soon be undertaking an evaluation of these assets and developing a strategic plan for their future development. The Inland Empire Regional Broadband Consortium is a large group of cities and private sector groups interested in promoting broadband technology in the region. Some of the priorities of this consortium include closing the digital divide, promoting the Inland Empire as a "smart region," and supporting Wi-Fi in public places. The Consortium is also supportive of counties and cities in their efforts to create fiber network plans using GIS. It is recommended that the City become a member of the Inland Empire Broadband Consortium. There is no cost for membership, as the program is funded through a grant by the California Public Utilities Commission. Participating in the Consortium will allow City staff to network with other public agencies and businesses that share our interest in this issue. Attachments: Resolution P676 M31. Consideration to approve a Resolution joining the Inland Empire Regional Broadband Consortium. RESOLUTION NO. 15-145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JOINING THE INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL BROADBAND CONSORTIUM WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has had an interest in the development of broadband infrastructure for many years. WHEREAS, the Inland Empire Regional Broadband Consortium desires to help close the digital divide, promote the Inland Empire as a "smart region," and support the development of Wi-Fi in public places; and WHEREAS, participating in the Consortium will allow City staff to network with other public agencies and businesses that share our interest in this issue. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby approve the joining to the Inland Empire Regional Broadband Consortium. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 151h day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Meeting of said Council on the 15th day of July, 2015. Executed this 1511 day of July, 2015, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice Reynolds, City Clerk P677 MEMORANDUM Crn"hLANAGER'S OFFICE RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City From: John R. Gillison, City Manage By: Breanna L. Medina, Emergency Management Coordinator Subject: CONTINUATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 15-093, PROCLAMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL DROUGHT EMERGENCY UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 8630 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.36 Recommendation Continue Resolution No. 15-093 proclaiming the existence of a Local Drought Emergency under Government Code Section 8630 and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.36. Background On January 17, 2014, the Governor proclaimed a state of emergency due to current drought conditions. On April 1, 2015, the Governor also issued Executive Order B-29-15 which directed expedited actions to reduce the harmful impacts from water shortages and other impacts of the drought. The Governor's proclamation called upon local water suppliers and municipalities to implement water shortage contingency plans immediately in order to avoid or forestall outright restrictions that could become necessary later in the drought season. In response to these actions, on May 12, 2015 the Cucamonga Valley Water District declared a Stage 6 - Severe Water Emergency in Resolution No. 2015-5-3. Cucamonga Valley Water District has declared a Stage 6 - Severe Water Emergency in order to achieve a 35% reduction in potable water as part of the mandate for a total statewide reduction as outlined by the State Water Resources Control Board. As a customer of the Cucamonga Valley Water District, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will need to enact emergency measures through ordinance and other operational and administrative actions in order to meet these executive orders and mandated conservation numbers. Additionally, the existing drought conditions exacerbate already perilous fire conditions in the northern portions of the wild land urban interface of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and increase the risk of flash floods due to soil conditions. These conditions are likely to be beyond the services, equipment, personnel and fiscal resources of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Continuation of this local drought emergency will allow the Director of Emergency Services (City Manager) to continue to exercise the powers, functions, and duties of the emergency organization of the City prescribed by state law, ordinances, and resolutions existing and passed in conjunction with this emergency. te ctf II tted,R. G n City Manager P678 STAFF REPORT - RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PRO'T'ECTION DISTRICT RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Date: July 15, 2015 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Tamara Layne, Finance Director Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst III Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FIRE DISTRICT'S GENERAL FUND FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,451,190, WHICH IS A COMBINATION OF $24,215,140 IN GENERAL FUND OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURES AND $26,236,050 IN CAPITAL RESERVE EXPENDITURES RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of a resolution adopting the Fire District's General Fund Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2015/16 in the amount of $50,451,190, which is a combination of $24,215,140 in General Fund operational expenditures and $26,236,050 in capital reserve expenditures. BACKGROUND The Health and Safety Code, commencing with Section 13890, requires that Fire Protection Districts: 1. adopt a preliminary budget; 2. publish notice regarding a public hearing for final budget adoption; and 3. that on or before October 1 sT of each year the Board shall adopt its final budget. In compliance with the above requirements, the Fire District Board of Directors has: 1. conducted a public budget workshop on June 4, 2015, and adopted the preliminary budget on June 18, 2015; 2. published on two occasions in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin notices regarding the public hearing for consideration of final budget adoption; and 3. submitted for consideration of approval a resolution adopting the General Fund Final Budget during the Board meeting scheduled for July 15, 2015. P679 APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FIRE DISTRICT'S GENERAL FUND PAGE 2 FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,451,190 JULY 15, 2015 The Fire District was able to achieve a proposed balanced operational budget through a combination of moderate revenue growth and continued improvements of operational and administrative efficiencies. The preliminary budget has been available for public inspection in accordance with the Health and Safety Code. The final budget is hereby presented for your consideration of approval. Respectfully submitted, Mike Costello Fire Chief Attachment: Resolution No. FD 15-019 P680 RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FIXING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2015 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2016 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District adopted its General Fund Preliminary Budget on June 18, 2015, and made said preliminary budget available for inspection by interested taxpayers; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors noticed a time and place for a public hearing regarding the preliminary budget; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District conducted said hearing in accordance with requirements set forth in the Health and Safety Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby adopt the General Fund Final Budget for the District for fiscal year 2015/16 and is hereby fixed and established as set forth and attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael., President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P681 I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the 15th day of July 2015. Executed this day of 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. 15-019 - Page 2 of 2 P682 STAFF REPORT - CO\UMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTDIENT RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John Gillison, City Manager From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director By: JoAnn Gwynn, Community Services Manager Subject: CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO APPROVE A CONTRACT WITH ACTIVE NETWORK LLC FOR THE UPGRADE OF CLASS REGISTRATION SOFTWARE TO ACTIVENET. FUNDS TOTALING $68,420 FOR ESSENTIAL COMPUTER EQUIPMENT APPROVED IN THE 15/16 FISCAL YEAR BUDGETED TO PAID FROM ACCOUNT 1714001-COMPUTER EQUIPMENT/TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO'S # 14-223, 14-097, 14-003 TO INCLUDE A 3.75% ACTIVENET FINANCIAL TRANSACTION FEE. RECOMMENDATION Consideration of a request to approve a contract with Active Network LLC to upgrade the current CLASS Registration software to Active Net and to approve a 3.75% Active Net financial transaction fee. BACKGROUND The Community Services and Library Services departments have been using CLASS software for recreation activities management, facility booking and point of sale services since 1999. Since our CLASS implementation 16 years ago, Active Network, the developer/vendor for CLASS, has acquired competitor's software and has focused on developing its flagship software, Active Net, which is a vendor-hosted internet-based solution. CLASS is an older, software licensing based model. Active Network will terminate its support for CLASS in November 2017. A Council goal was established to address the replacement of this essential software well before this date. Because Active Net was designed by Active Network, who also designed and supports CLASS software, the new solution is an upgrade, not a complete conversion to another product. Active Network has formally defined, tested, and implemented an upgrade path from CLASS to Active Net and has converted many of its other CLASS customers to Active Net. Active Net is the most robust solution for registration, facility booking and point of sale services. The upgrade results in less impact to costs and loss of productivity during data conversion, hardware and software installation and launch. P683 PAGE.2 Active Network has been on the forefront of the municipal market for over 15 years with 1,200, Active Net, implementations performed so far (more than 150 of which have been CLASS to Active Net migrations). Active Network's Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) model will provide our City with an affordable way to focus resources on providing excellent services to our residents. Active Net eliminates the need for costly software and IT infrastructure investments. Active Network owns and maintains the entire data base and web server infrastructure. Utilizing the hosted Active Net solution will reduce and or eliminate user licenses, servers or separate maintenance agreements. Active Network provides an integrated merchant account, secure public access and staff interface transactions while safely storing data backing it up every 30 minutes. Active Network offers significant upgrade incentives for current CLASS business customers, including a CLASS Customer Loyalty Professional Service Conversion to Active Net Credit of $21,900 the amount previously allocated for CLASS maintenance. Costs for technical support and upgrades are built into the transaction pricing model, each financial transaction is charged a technology fee and credit card processing fee where applicable. Active Net becomes the merchant for credit card transactions with full PC] level 1 compliance, taking the responsibility for risk and validation requirements at the point card data is entered into Active Net. The financial transaction model consists of various fees charged for financial transactions that range from 1.5% - 4.25%. The City has elected to establish one average 3.75% transaction fee for all customers registering for fee based programs. This fee would be included in and amend Resolution Numbers 14-223, 14-097, 14-003 and be reviewed annually. The transaction fee would be built into the cost of each program. For example, a 4 week session of a Senior Stretch and Balance Class with an $8 class fee would be raised approximately .30 cents. A key component of Active Net supports the new vision of the Community Services Registration Team. The ability to offer mobile services at satellite locations and integrate with the RC2Go trailer will enable our front line staff an increased opportunity to promote and inform our residents about programs and events. The additional registration service functions include, Activity Registration, Facility Reservation, League Scheduling, Memberships and Point of Sale (POS). Each of these functions include upgraded features that will improve the overall registration process. The anticipated launch of the new Active Net will be with our Spring 2016 session of programs; online registration beginning the third week of February. P684 PAG13 3 FISCAL IMPACT Funds totaling $68,420 for essential computers were approved in the 15/16 fiscal year budget. Respectfully submitted, Nettie Nielsen Community Services Director P685 RESOLUTION NO. 15-144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE APPLICABLE TO COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND AMENDING RESOLUTIONS NO. 14-003, 14-097, AND 14-223. A. Recitals. 1. The California Government Code allows the City to establish fees and charges for municipal services, provided such fees and charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to the City in providing the service to which the fee or charge applies. 2. Data indicating the estimated or actual cost to provide each service, for which the fees and charges set forth herein apply, was made available to the public at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing. 3. On July 15, 2015, City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the amendment. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Resolution. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and resolves as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this resolution are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby specifically finds that the fees and charges set forth do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge be levied. SECTION 3: The City hereby adopts the following fees for services performed by the Community Services Department as noted below, and amends Resolutions 14- 003, 14-097, 14-223 accordingly. SECTION 4 The City hereby adopts the following fees and policies related to services performed by the Community Services Department. Active Net Transaction Fee Fee Description Fee Amount Fee Effective Upon Approval New fee required upon each Active 3.75% Net financial transaction Resolution No. 15-XX— Page 1 of 3 P686 SECTION 5: The fees set forth in this Resolution shall take effect upon the adoption of this resolution. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Resolution No. 15-XX— Page 2 of 3 P687 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July 2015. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 15" day of July 2015. Executed this 16th day of July 2015, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Resolution No. 15-XX— Page 3 of 3 i ‘it. 0 kr r > ...,7, sx 4.. o- VA fett 14:44N :,7142 i44; -C .. � C/ (0 : c., ,,.. Ps =NM la 0 3 /0 , .:„ :.7.s.-':7.:::.:.':41: C37 -1\5 { k) ;1 SA :"... I%) -,-; :,,,:j„,-.:2.Lii.5_,‘,,,. s7-07 CD ...-_,,a --\ 7-----40...\--.— . ,o <Zr cr _c+ �Da p 3 .„. ..„, ,_,.,..,..„ cv, M WY 0 Y" .4;i * , Z>. MI z xy #0,44.4i.,= Sc CD � �r bg • • • . CD D Z C7 � (nn -0 ,n+ O is r O O O O CCD CD O U)r + e N CS _ CD An .t:14° * �- M. CD CD k . 0 CD D— 0 CO rcy CD -0 CD 5 . eNs ititt ((1 W G A) CO W VOi CD g CO =F 0 kin Cn CD n CD O p %--1+ „ ; O O Nk ifi rsitl 0 — W ` C D , �� A = CY : %;A dri: CD 0 < Q = ,, CD. < DO wy, Z U) _ A CD 0 (Q 1-7* c O W CC 0 C X D 0 CO CD . n ). - 10.1 itrooN w N w CD: g z a d t;114.+ 1;14434 2 ,. . , . . ...,,, . et e it.• 4, , - a,'z 413 Ill p O O 0 3 *< (Q (D - — co m(n (D (n (D (D (D N CD (1 0 )› rowfr! (n — Co C N O Ma '. rF C) = O O "' ic.:,.:40-7,,2 4: iti CD CD 0 SD -C3 p //�1� Gl. ,fin (DOS x aj fie° O ,. k i..".„,,4.. ® e) OS ota4 - —■ Si 0 () C7 N Q p O �J , iliii Mtn (p' �• N 3 (n. (D (D O Vin- • (D C 0 Q' C (D -' CD ■W —•-7 0c -0 �' cr N (DO 0 .� O co CD 0 Al (n Al N UI a3 < -t lea 0 O O '< O CD n o Ir 1 .;<. m O Q U oz o Ummt r , ,,,, * 45) 1■411S ,,,.to#,,,, c '4,es......,.. , UI � N a)o m 3' -5. o c = m r. cn r. ^. Z v O c. m m o cn cn Q (.0 • 0 m a { a w co 3 o w o .x m CO -.co . 0 c) mil,' ;:fra 4 ii,... , . a) .-1.• sr lID cm O � V Ai cD ' 0 0 Nrito CD m 3 o & co Cl) CD � O 0 C r ;. O O O n O imF O (Q (D (D Q 0 O 7 6 O = (D r (� ¢Qj Q O FA O , (Q Kc'- 41 C 0- CD 6_ } 0 le I � st a ri„ 0 o 3 m Fi3 a) <_ ' o c - m CO cn 0- 0 i. H H hi.-f MO O = a a n ¢) 2. a a-�. 7 < 0 ccnn n V) Q. n CD —■ �2 3 al CD T. (D ,n. 0 ,. n CD f C - N s-D O (n n Z yv ,. CO -" (Q _ -h CD n g.' (D a p = cn w o p �* r� ; J + O gli 113 cos a It b. gri_.".%,n___ co{ to o33 Q3 03w ii -1 fib ;2 kgis . f. m o V m o D �. • .h —. ▪ a N �_ w .. o m 3 m w 'Z m a Q w CD O -p (D p ¢) a V+ _ m- a 3 a 0 n `A A) CD = = a z 1 . Q Q .� 2 �a sY O . - 3 = 0 tat .. w O (D -0 N X c O (•D o .-. o Q • :,-:,ti.::-. 4144--,-;‘,. ; a %I°'„ re, •re- -:...cn 3 X 7 3 0 O CD _'115! -► co "a_ (D O iial, 'O .� 0 0 (U 0. Q O w Q O s .. (D O O O n (D ::::::::::,;may' •G O O 0 co O SF3 . C7 N O N 7 n . t (D P O N Al ■ 0) r+ 441141 . —• Plk,44 CP. 3 0 m 3 0 o w 0 mi sv —% = �. 3 � �c�um ^+ V+ Oi•� w cn (n * £ r« Q -, oc � r- r. (Q r3 74 a - _ — sr) co co —cs) O O O xF (D O N A) CI a j. 0. 3 = CD -O n vyB� (D a 0 9 x6= iY y r 2.. Q > U) ; I W -0 C m .= . ki. A 7:1 CD • � • - �■ 0. �vr'4 (Q r n y ift. - o zlk ct 0 Q Pc 3 = (D Z Co f ri- 1:„...."„,,,.",,x4it.::: Co CD o ka /mile D a a 3 3 C)-. .f ags Q X' T Q n1 rc D c� WArt rF > Ca C!) Z D �. CD c ri 1 �t C CD Q C (D r 0 N • 1 O T{ 'T' t • • • w: -1 � D Q) m = 0 _D Cl) = a o mom — 0 o Pa sno < $, N 5.+ n o 3 CD tet CD o m m m Z AO r mW 7c "s aies at o 0 Cr -% gig . 4414 -a O. ,tea z vi Cn CD o ° can 0 4 CD * CD iml• ,-;.1 ‘ ., CD = ■Ii• 0 v f',...~-ai CD O CD O � n s. n Ul , CO new 17; lor 0 ' 0 Z 0# = C) w & f � . 4r ti 3i CO 0 • CO robe ki w ;:ii:Lti,;::-Ii$11:141,:: 1 a it, 1•11114 tt ■ I 0) 0 7-441;::::1; 07 C d� ' . r) 0 .■Z O O:vt < C O M x___11 „,.....”. n ;, CO kz-a N Srtl 7 kt)K ,4-; a P688 MEMORANDUM AD\nNISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 C;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Subject: Continuance of Advertised Public Hearing —Taxicab Service Permit— American Cab At the request of the applicant, the hearing originally advertised for the July 15, 2015 City Council meeting to consider the public interest, convenience, and necessity in granting a Taxicab Service Permit to American Cab has been continued to the August 5, 2015 City Council meeting. NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING At its regular meeting held on July 15, 2015, the City Council of City of Rancho Cucamonga continued the following items, Items N3 and N4.., to its meeting to be held on August 5, 2015. N3. Consideration of public interest, convenience and necessity in granting a Taxicab Service permit to American Cab. —City(To be Continued to August 5, 2015 City Council Meeting) N4. Consideration of public interest, convenience and necessity in granting a Taxicab Service permit to RYKAL, LLC dba Yellow Cab as there was a change of ownership. —City(To be Continued to August 5, 2015 City Council Meeting) The meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730-3801. Said continuance was passed by the following vote: AYES: Alexander, Kennedy, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None DATED: Thursday, July 16, 2015 L •:a . Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director P689 MEMORANDUM ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPdRn. [ENT RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Subject: Continuance of Advertised Public Hearing —Taxicab Service Permit— Rykal, LLC dba Yellow Cab At the request of the applicant, the hearing originally advertised for the July 15, 2015 City Council meeting to consider the public interest, convenience, and necessity in granting a Taxicab Service Permit to Rykal, LLC dba Yellow Cab has been continued to the August 5, 2015 City Council meeting. NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING At its regular meeting held on July 15, 2015, the City Council of City of Rancho Cucamonga continued the following items, Items N3 and N4.., to its meeting to be held on August 5, 2015. N3. Consideration of public interest,convenience and necessity in granting a Taxicab Service permit to American Cab. —City(To be Continued to August 5,2015 City Council Meeting) N4. Consideration of public interest, convenience and necessity in granting a Taxicab Service permit to RYKAL, LLC dba Yellow Cab as there was a change of ownership. —City(To be Continued to August 5, 2015 City Council Meeting) The meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730-3801. Said continuance was passed by the following vote: AYES: Alexander, Kennedy, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None DATED: Thursday, July 16, 2015 _ Linea • . Troyan, MMC L .--- dity Clerk Services Director P690 STAFF REPORT - Cr1T NL�NAGER'S OFFICE Date: July 15, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council From: John R. Gillison, City Manager Subject: UPDATE ON 2015 CITY COUNCIL GOALS In January 2015 the City Council held a workshop to review the status and achievements of goals set in prior years, as well as establish new goals. As can be seen on the attached July 2015 Goals update, many of the goals established by the City Council have been completed, or are near completion. Staff will provide a more detailed review of the goals during the presentation to the City Council. Respectfully Submitted, J John R. Gillison City Manager T a 0 m m C m L O Y U m C C m N a J 0 m m E o E n m ao v y co t o 5 m a E U ° C U C T m N E 10 m �_` N la m ° �. O L m (D 0° 3 U a N cm m `� o o N 3 U J n� o � U 2' ° a) J ca 3 m m m y E m N 0 m N m C L U y U N O 'U Z v C T E E L c C m ai n J r 2 - m e -0 ca m y y m € ¢ o € c Ecy -° O « c m (D Lo .- m cEa? E cc0 c « C O N T c N C N 3 m U cc CDC d 0 o o O 3 m O1 m a .Y m } N C m .0 OI m 0 V v C o ca > N ONE « a m N co C �_^LL. v `m m C c c o E m m m E m c v 0 O L ca O o O n m U C 0 �a IA t9 Ol « N N w t0 0 .� N m m N LL N C O C U ` E « C a m im a,N ca C N E N lEa C C C C r r N a m > C 3 J O L N v O m c m o m c°� m vi aci - 3 3 J m E m m c °- a!- m C a �- c m ° c 'S - m c m e o o m o m c . Limo E 3 '0 m m N O d - O r- m a N a U O U v C �O `-° O' E W n C 'C V O In m 3 C O LL J > 0 3 « R c L m N n y m m N > O m v N « cca >. a N C cm « I LO ca m U L m v T a1 � O N C E m c « r O) c �� L N CV o�+ O .° a ' > m .O c' C m C C -° O L y ` o m U C N m r 3 o U O K c C) a) 'O >. !` N - - C J 01.r 'p1- 3 C N E m O v U J J m a O m mcm o � DOE � mmo. c mcd 0com `m m `oc°� o ° m U m ' o y o mi c t Jo m � E ¢ E m m` v m ¢ « J o v aci co m m d °- c E 3U 0. cU -6 - m m - -° cv o -D o o m .0 cin O v a a.N .° J m 3 3 a .o m m d C m m m c v J m � mmN me nom a °c >' mE rnr 0) - 0 c .0 ca ct5 t `� LL O � m m m c c m m U U > 'c m m Lm. 0) c ami J a m o �' m n o c N N r- C v N J m m v m 10 N °• c'� h V a E r v co E 3 L v v o Z w c y c c U � p r o N O O Y m Q m ca E C L ° 'C N C a m m 0 v 10 0 m c v p m 3 a N N N C L W « W m a N C N C C m LL N U ° W c p N V t v W m O L m J E r o a m r m E m o 'p c o C ¢ N o C !- m o o cy U m r 0 U U O m W C W O D U O N O C a a m W C v N U m N m W N T C LL m J E p 'L' J m ° �. N N m v m E J m C T m �' OI' J U G N t0 " m 'O d c` U C a m N LL .N o1 a N N « ca a 0.c7 m .0 q C 0 ° � n c `m 2rn N -_° a0 ° m 'v mEJ cn L_ fd ocm 0m ¢ N O « fnUm UaUv Ua° 50Ea Hm 00Mo U, .wO U ° 3oc > � 9m U ¢ m m m N rn r Y c n m c° c o y J o m = E v rn °. ca U o` N m N a O O! N t5 > V m C « V ° m y C L > y -m0 'O m a N d v R ►� Q N C ' J n n m a1 O N 0 a N ° ° ° C c m o m m O ¢ 0 O G CM m 7U o `J m v v w(C o O N w E n E ate c c ( a L 0m 0 r E = c a0 - m° m a m o ` 0 C ai a Q C tm 0 E c m° 0 E C E c o m a L° v m L O ornv c O ctu c co 6 E 60 LL 0 0° co Co N OCI 3 m rn m c 'y 'N d ° m 3 m m °o r o O N 3 3 0 'v U m . m 'm mom oN m m C n J n m �' T N v O C > 0- v a N U N p E 0 'E � C J L O J 'X O J m m U O c 0 in c° O O N r LL N C O m U m « ¢ ¢ ca Q a U O U a W 19 w 3 Z //� C m tO Y/ O N V 1D N i° �° O W` E l0 m N O N N N L N _ N D C T ` ` / O £ E p j J J C J m to m O lL O O ca ti U o m V a W m L M m N (V) IT v cn W m 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 N N O } Y N N N N N N N Hl N = U W W `` a m C L N N N J n ' E N m U V V U a E ° c c c m a� a2 Q Q O y m ca y O co U) to cmi U o p aJ m E p m m > > > a m E LL E 0 LL aUi E E E Q J Q O L CL v U U U N = d R m v r O c m E M w o V m E E m vc o � w y .E ° c d n - 'C aa)i m a Q C O m U of m a c C N m y m y 0 'lp 'O E `o L cm N a m m U v m E n v N Jo Y 3 m c m e U m « a._ E ° 0 do ° w o amE my v° m a m C C E m E c E Y m o v o E � m a m � 0 « � �j ° D E a L cm of a O E t 'a oc mm m , j a c m W m v J O J N N Cl « co cn 0 m T ~ Y C my C N a N W m fn O OIC L m a� « U w E � m = W y � E a? (D ° > E N is E y Y p « my 0 N E «° o w d Z v p o m e o 0 o m m o O v o -00 Co m n v = > a rn ao � m m O m oc >m a�cc mE � « m rn� c `tea O- ~ Im cp a ° dim Nm m a Q a A omN vm W 13° m oc EO1:a Imo C v` E E °' c E o c as y m c c 0i `= -- a o c o 'v v m c U m o v E - aci '° d m m a U c `w° .� 010 E 'm Q. � 3 rn N U y J o `� v cd W d 2 o W �o c as m 2 0 o N c w a" C Q U c m O is Of O C Z ~ C C 0 G 3 O C o .0 1a N O CmN UUm a 3 O p nU) � vY vmm ° ¢1O C V O Z'� N O Q v U o m >` ` a.mc O R � C J .5 « 10 0 a) m aciw 'm Y ami yN N o E - o 3 0«° 0 cc m o c m m E m E °- U) U a m ;? m Li 0 'a c p E r o `m m o d a m °� Q o �, m aa) U o a>i 0 w m m `m CL s U U LL 0 a U U E a LL d a U ¢ o ¢ U o c 0 N N TOM a a a s a a a s N a) (O c m « m ( ' o y o m '; m m m rn o _ m m ' LL rn m v va •N N v y° d g C m O LL 0 am o o E ° «c ac o m ¢ c m m p a n c ¢ > c Z ° rn E m 0 o a o 7 m 3 C m m > 0 m n O ie E O � 0 m ° .E O o o Y C v c m ' o m E' w a c� ; o dam r ro 0 w ' c m m a"i « v mmU m ° rnp ° d ° « Iv oc. o0 ° acc mE � wmm n.o � ¢ H ma) 6 � cmy N m e C — m 00 ry n c « C Q N c d 0 C C O. O 'O E a 7 v v° m 'o m ¢ Q o n m o = 3 0 m ' ro = m m U IcE E c �' L CD) ICE N c N O' � >.m = O m n . -0 v ° 'y fA a > a 4) U c Imn m 3 ° m '�v n E�i vl ai 0' N m F y C c v 3 '� m ° m m o m m 2 U ro ro m p p a E E 0 C y m n 0 = .3 U m O �+ v o- o U) w 'fl N m m > r m n= v c Co cv m m c v m g c m c o o N .0 c 0 3 m 0 « L U a 0 _ C C V m IE OLIO 0 O a O. C Ca H > Lm. . c O m S 1° « a I0E c m n a 'v r ~ � c p o :y E c m m � m mamm am a 0 � C o-(a0it ot° mc �� y oo1' c m m 3 0 c 0 ICE W « N a 'O L C 0 U i0 r U d — ro 0 U .c y m E m 2' m m au y. c � m ,� mE 3 m L 0 ¢ cE m '= ° ocm m ° m0 Umm ° g ° ro ° m ° Nm ro E m 2 0 0 -0 0 c c ¢ .� y 'Z ,N m m m « N Y 0 9 « �y m a m ° m c o _ n m L r m E p m L a m m a IE m vi c 'o m m Y CI F- ° 'n m a o _° p V C U J m E CI V U 'O 0 m O - m 'D G U N m O c ¢ m 'm« m W Q in '�"' C O .- C C C N N N 0 .0.. O C 111 C > C N 'm0 C 0 C T in F o m o o ¢ .E c 0 o m . 6 o ro y c � Ei F m '� m � � m � M mo J m N U 0 L O -` « 2 E co c N N C L m m U C J p H n > c 2 m LL o ° ro m L x o c a 2 m E C N 'O1 f > E > « a y ¢ LL o N o CO1 h H cw n.3 m ro a o m o m c 'n 0 m y O m m ° 0 - U U as 0 0 a.0 UUN m Ow o 0 � O Up 2 .0 ¢ cn 0 U) CL a c c 7 Lm. 2 m E L d a cm 0 c 3 m -0 E c E = v ` O 'v U m U .o T E N E U 2 It O U N « CD . E m —CIm E N N O A C A V-1 Y O ( m = U -0 . aD 2 E 3 m C °' $ cE CL LL c " W w c c E = a N c0 E�i "% � � a0E m « ? c � m 0 2 m C O O L C 'O — C O C .,6 N r LL CCF m m m E � . o r m ro E c J d r s m m a� E a c m y > 2 ,_., 1= v 0- a > > m o o O1 a) c � N C N A 0 C Z) n LL p 2 Z � V m 0 o U A to Z !- > C � c In In In ,O N d o N m 0 0 = v m ES �„ 0 p N N y O 0 E3 !U d N N W a> E nm a L 5 � a d m m L w E O y E a m a) $ E7 �i E w V C/) ¢ D C omo U p E ° W m � U L m � y In In In In In O 01 o 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 >- y N N N N N = N N N E) 0 w W 10 j m V N CD � d V 2. z Q C U U c U m v L -' a y °c' a m U U U C m a p w E o c co T v 0 L g E E w U ) E w J 0 Z' o o i o U U U N U O > •' Mro Tv y 'O 9 O_ mm O a L a m U I E L °m -L O 2 m _m CO. m ;m C G L c E E7 v a'0 « 0 ` _ c c 3 0 0 ° 0 1i 01 o 5 C O (/1 m F- O m C O) m N mt o " 2 ¢ Q O. 0 1 0 E _m .m v1 "0 0 0 lE ~ 0 3 4I m � GI w CO 0 E m V V c _ N L C m °L' « C m CO « Y E > N V 3 A Q) D o w m o' 3 c U H m > � � aN m wc a0 a;_ a Z N CYmc 3 o0) V N n a d ro v c w m `' C -° ° 0 o c d m '0 ° mm 0a Eo � 7 rorocn c ac m ro .O E N O r _ N ro m O oa° cc 2a $ � O y c .E 2 4Ei a Q C O ro C .0 p U = O 0 m m 0 u .0. C a O c O ro a C ca C r U L E d ro 01 V d v n m m $ a c ° m a w 1a 2_ o m m m E Q m � c N m Em « m' 0 °i E U ; m ` ° m ~ > T3J c Ln .m 2_ .E o O o o m a U M - E m m m am oL c7 E ay INiLm m vim « v m LL E ro croi m Z o 'O c 21 0) m « 2 cvm m c c °1 O U v ca Ea m ro « ma c o Z TCL 0 m E m D o rn ; 2 V .,OO Y E `° an d Q L m _o°c E o > N d > o. mnt d v c v c Z N y > m a a m E ECi v m IE > m x m .>= 0 m ° m m .� E m 0 0 > c pv tr W _ ¢ U 0 U) w Q a0 'u 9w 2m U ¢ ro O r N m to 1` r r r r r r r r a a a a a a a a CO) _ m m d aNi m m `m ¢ p `° o o E N t « a `� 3 N E m« -o « F F- a) o co C T m N V y a to N O C m m 'D m m O) T C d L m > E 3 ° « -o c ° v c - « c m Y w v m Co c c w ° m L m a= o o a o m 2 3 m c m t h c ai o °3 .�ui E _T N m m a O) Co o o tmi ° U N ink m C L m Tom, O dU m C > 6 C cj G m O m m m m m y c m m « ° N 0 d N c o m n C m m a) « R m o ma a E x « E CL a)E 'E� m m c m c End o v m°- m m o u m E ° n ¢ m m N y m Y « o 0- CU M V O E 'O m a -O ° C m m m - C N m N m y N U J N C Z L = m tao a C C m c 'm C m v C is Q > a U L m o v 0 3 U x m >` v v v m c 3 °c .. -°y E y Co M._ _ m c o 3 m m co nE «' > m �^ 7 � E � __ m .mo 'a aa � v° � Um ___ a0a)i ooN � � maV > > m3o, v � ma r d m m 3 'O m c y m m m « 3 N N N O N m 'O N U m Y N « C m O 0) Z N r X L N a m N V N _ m « C m m N T C O to m` O `� C C L U N m j aL c N U N a m m an d = L m N m U L O m FF C « a LO R ❑ m a U ❑ > y m m J V E Co 3 «O. r m 'O >` O .° m C L N Q C m = O m O C m m 0 -1 -j m � mE rnm ma aci ) 0NO v � ' 'Q� X03 2 (D vi ° E yEoc 0 .0 N a 5 m oo.. m c y 3 `a N ¢ a L Y �N„- - n ° o Na E aci T c v ° m 0 E L o ?' m = « o a E � � c c c c ~ N m m ° m n o - m � E E m O m 0 .2! > 3mC y '; mm vmm > tT« cc3m � yavc LaN wami >'' `o � mo mc �° ` L m C m a) coo N m m G-O m m N N m Yl V m > to m 0 .3 O m 0 CO .� V to .� N C co O m N N m - m N ° m `• Of a) m ° E o, 0 a RI > m C '� m 0 m « m O)c m m € O1� m N O. m N N a N N C m .mD U N C 0 N d O N a O U E C m N m 3 V L C C .> 'C 2 « C « «y c a a U a m a o m ?` rn tr E m m °cL v m .� c E o ° m R w m c E ° `a v aa) m m m C aa) - t m m m -oi m «�. y v m w « 0 - o -Low a d 0 o a o U) c o a co m E c m d o, E ° 3 r :c 2 c m c m .- a N ° N m '^ v v N m c m a) N a m N d N fn a.� « 0 C N m N In O « V .� N C d O m m J m c 'O c CD m - L m .m- -° �O C m N m t0 C U C V C V U L U O « m O m 0 N O o CD ¢ Qa'33 yQNw y � o ,'a Qcac °mN u_ionmc 'cm �_ mdom3c macmr. m N p Q N C N c m m Y C U N m m m O m x G m ° T O m 3 Y m C ~ « N o `-' c E C'I Q c v N .ro t m m d U c Q 0 L c m a m € y o o m N E N c m E d o 2"ro m o E OM m 0 N tD tm > m C V i m U W m a N o c C E c 0 .m.. ° O � E E U ❑ o m a ❑ o 'm 3 'o ,Na c m o 'v `-a '� N a m w m m c 'x x ° 3 m :o. L m m E E a O m O N O L U ° > m 0 1 N O m a m m m U a C m m O m d m `� a N L > J ° Jv « $ 'o o m o UvN as 5 •`o E a« c0 to ow in m o E to oMBv m 3 Fw NUto _ o v 3 Z y m m °O N O 0 � m E E E o '� ui m ." m m ° m m U °c' N C\l 0 -0 l0 r fA c m m j Ol C� tN m m ° C d N !? m c v E 5 t6 a O t6 V 0 N a •�C7 .� m G m N o d o m U ❑ v �. m o 0 t a o a LL Y/// cn ° m O 3 C N O N Y ' °O m 0 Z N E o oL v m 73 c o -1 y ai Y o o m 7 f N c 0 } o E '� N x T m m y t� o °E LL o � c E o J ` 0 N .c c 0 d U m m 0 m CL C Y c c L 7 .� m p m C = ? N c O C N F- L U U ° 'm D m .� LL O U .- V to LL LO It 10 C n - LA E U 0 a � O a N tN VJ N W N a).S M U U` O 0 W m ] ]L LL N M D to V a W v M i N O V 7 V 7 LY d 0 0 0 0 0 OT tp N N N N N Z; \W w U Y o a w O C U O m N 3 C tco N O w C a LL a R fl d U N U J tr m m m « « c m (D � c d o m 2 N co m c C N C 7 m 'm O m m 'Cl _ � m w O 0 a cc O 0) - t U 'l0 « to C N N m E m m - y Co co a)ANC n a m 2 0 aa) aa) m E a o p 'x N c o, rn w a ° Y c m _ Cd N .00 C p N c m C Q o 7 m m m O R NL. m > m N 1= r NC E � m 0 " T ja C O m m m a U �O m m m 0 > « a V c C N° o 3 W « 0 « _ m C > O O Q U ° m '�� i to w co m _ M m c C C N .N L m m 0 m d O 'C U 3 C = « m c > C C C "O C Q 0 ° a C _O O N ' O 0 N O o `3 a Y g 0 c C C y E LT a o o a c c w :n c a o m o c m o N m E m S c ❑ m dU 3 «° U Q N m > o c min 0 0 d m N N m o 2 m o U v ( U Q) c c E H L 0 E m to c tr an d cU U `o a 2 06 > E U 'cn > ' m N d- «<>o U c 2 E m x CD = W _ , 0 d .0 � U rn ❑ m m S co F r N N Tom N a a a a a a a� m o c d c m m !� ° a m m ° N aa) a 3 oa on m m� = v w Hind m o m m O)w to 7 Z C a m m N > 0) 'N 7 E T N m m C :� m a LLl a F d a) mri o o t¢n � Q � .o :°. rc y o n a m> co m d o > m rn Lm. ° o 'U LL r0 C T .O o m m m D Y O r n w N -0 N Z m « O •> '� N y C N U '� N m C m m N .N ZQ a C 3 m m 0 > f0U «N. rn U v O ° 0 ` 4T) 7 'm (n m N a J m L N m m N = m « O � � cn3m mE � oti � mmncm Nm -aa°i m � aoy o c a m ° "> m N ,° r 3 a to m a) J y c a m Q m m z .o .a) m E •o y 0 m U « O m m n E `a m o E a) c m m ° E c m '? '° m N C 'O d m N a o n:y O m U) n E Z m '0 ¢ a CO m A LL O y .V m Y0TQ = Cy (D m « E nom m3LL 0a) .0C yN C m a m V N m E C y N N « N 0)J m o Co o a y m c FL 3 'a 'c -o v N ° > L > E o N am) c m m m i j n o m 7 -O n > °c m y m x o. Q U m ° ro L U a) ° F- 0 .m m .� J c a n m o . n a y m a m a n 0 o -0 m y ° � v c v CD m n� c a E = d m m .0 v 0 L v � o > no m L a c a _ y o C ~ N >+ J n m N N m s N m -> a) N N ro J O U 0)'3 « m m to C O c )n m ° N a '3 c y ° m m ° 0 y m C o ° (7 � c o m m c r L ac m 3 « m 3 c 0 v N ❑ vim° m E 0 M 0 c 7 'O m a a m ° c N gym . m L > 42 j o o O 0 0Zy0E mmc � m mcrov a `co « 10n$ Y0 Ein30. Nd0 m c ° °15 N CO 0 c n r 0)o , � « N E a) m « 0) .- - 3 0 -0 r u) - ma a m 0 m 0 N C m N (n p tCtl N ¢ wo CO a) a) a) E .F' a c ° m >. > > m a c m o C o c a L 3 N m U L, N n« y _ m 3 J f/ U E a) C C m 0 a C m C N J m N _N U « ° t°o ° ` co D C O C G O. CO y O L C J ty E N C N- c C)tl) a U C m N C C ` o omm m ° j —m `oc3 'E c m m 3m my as otnomc a`) > ° o aEro Ev° m od � O- a= co a) (D aEn mm � -° c Ey m .cEc =_ nvmUm r0 J m CSE � mm o ) ac wcD v` 2m '- O y a E E m 3 O N �_ N m C on > L L N O O" N N U N m )0 m N m C )`o ¢c m m Off ❑ LL ° mU _ ❑ m ° m c Z` 0) - m . 'OL N )a W L_, C « N Oa n m C_ LL U Q m Z' E 3 m m 'U O ` O ca Y O L m N m m- 'U _J m U 3 C= Q1 L CO N 'L-' O a)) ° n ~O p1 vyi a ° c .Lm. °- E 7 0 0` U `-° a`) v L c o 2 N n o m G • ° 3 G v o m t 'm c c m . a m n m y N 3 d c a c m C E N ° N v p '> W p1 O ' p) W U C c N CO m L Y Y a) y "O Y c m c y O E J > m % m co U a) F` X t° C H m m a1 N U n 0 O C ;_a p 'O a) c Z C m y CO n._ O U C m y T W W 1 m o w m E ` c N ° 3 a V m N Co .> U m to n 0 U L % N ° O m E m m . .� UNa`m JmnoJ 5mc ym« � moEa � E co 'mm � a' x daE L C d m C m c 1 m 0 LL LL O C C U L n m N C E E ❑ V m m m Y C 7 Z a m � O1oEmm myTN Eo rx ' m zom0 m ayi m � a) ac -00aUm m o am 0--c - c O a>i m o t c m ;q m C o ;o ° o . m E m n o J o= m o f m T w i) U U a 3 ¢ w U 0 v O m N F m N « U E m a vl a E > m a � ° w n 3 H ° ❑ a o T O m a c o v ; O a) N O m n•0 C p O ° a O C cc N - m m 0 y ai ai m E m v v E E E cc 0 L O E O U •� Y 7 N N N N m 'c V y ° LL o Y E m ` o m o m In � o m e a) `_ c 0- ° o - w (j r - m N C o m e m O o c m 0 0 °N C O n E c c C C N N 0 E LL 75 a)E E E 5 LD m c G L E % n C C 7 C O y O O O O C O nm o o 0 = °o m � a n Z Z UE� NZ CL U) m U) m oc 7 am m N i O LO U L ) �p a/ •«0- N i° N 1° N N N C/) p W N W m 0 N 'N N m m CD o o C\I m m m N m w�°> E m W O n ami m m o U ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m Un W N M � W )n )n )n )O )n v) to W t6 O Ql o O o 0 o O o O O } � N N N N N N N N N r N W w > N .J• U U U_ U .T H o m z U m c CO co Q m ° ¢ m a) a) mm >- cZ m m c m m a p c n m c ¢ c c m c c v m C v mm to m a c' N m E a m m J U Q U U y C m N 7 N m_ Y C O ° > O co O O 0 -2 o -0 m E «° m 0. c L n E m N c o « m r.al o m c °o c cE a c_Z o ° m c U 0 m D m v 0 c> 0 rn a)i c m.- ° O C O m o o N a 3 n o Y° Q ° ro ) 2 C O > > C C C a c d G Z U O n ? _ O a7 n C c > L o O a y E Eo E m n m c m F 2 0 C U a N c O m m m a V 0 C � -O mEm a)0 y o mm 0 m a) a H E m m m n N 0) E '0 n a) y N N J m- m L 0 O c CL O Y o y m a) 0 a C r °O c U O N d C m n al C d a > o N N r '0 C > °v E m N 4 m n o y 2 Q n U 0 O E m ° o aJ m « m ' m N 3 E N E m m y m EC wm 2 w om y 0) Cc mv E o c n Q m v w c a 0 E ai 0 LL O D U m to N C a) c J U m U C ❑ U m CO m U_ m m m N m 0 C) N ) C O C Q N m C n C C m m O_Z n C m al 0. 12 m C y _ m « C m O N O m m .m- .4) « O ¢ O 7 0 0 7 •m E N E V U n J✓ N a c c m e m y E Q.y d N °i m m n m m m c m m _ m aa)) ca U m a m m 0 aa) m N N m o E C O. 0 CL O n�O a p a o (7 O o E U J O U ❑ 0 0 3 ❑ E y ❑ O.'N •O D C U E a rn U o a> Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q u) a) m m a = m m « U W c O N 'D va of c `om « c3 cUm y � ro � U m1° E •C 0 c Xa C m L O m c v E m W o « a m - mE y N 0. C O m I O X L roQ N m V m L 0 �) lC cc r N r O c w O m CL A 0 c 75 LL mL CD a) � "0 E � (N6O cv N � C ON CO c 0 L C E m m c a m s Q m E o 3tA 0 m y « m m m ¢ ro E ? c m c o « a o � p y cm c m aN vN E o v o a m E m e c � w N °- Z 0 m0. f�SN/ U -« 0 C O 'm V U a X N Y E 0 O L Q c ro N CD r a ` N m C Z N m U c - 0 0 0 E E ° ° T O m O W 0 > m > L m > O m n m tro E O O z C m L N L 10.. ooc'0 NoO3 � =' ca 0 c0 y0 '000 ° y cvmm N m .N tC °' O - N ° ' C N o� .0 a� vl "0 m CO — CL c m aci aci m a m 3 y Z n a c aci ° o E n c 0 -0 '- ° - N lctl E E O Nif O L N N y m N Y O a C N N O U -N0 E ) R '> N m L "O ° cd o!° E m w d �'� m CO 'c m m a E m ro v ° U E a U L c U N m E U m d C m A W ro ~ d .0 E C ~ N lT0 M N .°c «O > m ro m O N O 7 0 3 `- m E itl V m N E m w y N N `0 « o U > m y 'C = N y c VT0 ° E mE ¢ `o 'o � o, o m 3yn0 CD c c m « v 3 > N o L Q E c C7 c m c c U v E ° c m a m A is O J O C c ttl n m¢ " v U Q m U N ca M O. N tc0 o m m O d C W c ° U U m 7 L G 00 m « CL Y c L -0 « fn O ca N a s m 5 � O C O O C ` c « N '0 m c 0 ro m C N L d m « 'C 0 m fl1 N 'c c ltl 'C V m m - O - 3 m L O m "O m L ° m C « L ro co O L c n:F Ol O j i0 C O) O C R C 10 .3 Ol« 4T •0 N ~ L O V m N ° D 0a) > cnm " ooNYo = mvi 'O = cm 0 m3 « r c c `� m m' o aNi U c m aOi ai c N o '� v a o 3 m « 3 rn c rn O c m - m •c m E > ro o L c ?-2 3 0 N o ro N ro m E m m a m c m N o � i. N 0 c rn U c o a ° o ro m y r y 0 y � rn 0 � > � mmE0 cm0) t0 -1 ° $imm. m O00 ta> > ta3ic > U) a m U ¢ m « m n F H v m N S LL c m « to 3 0 ¢ a H v m r v 0 nm ° m m m >« c E a E c m m m o o C7 E r H (D IA c C m. c m N U O U m m N c j Cac aCd m cr 3 0 0 0 LCD W c_ 0.c a° w 0 a m Y f O1 O w w o O. ° m C o N ° ° m E 0. N c 0 ; m m m o ro ro N 0 m w m m m v m m e a LL v 0 E E 3 a U E E E m m J m m ~ ~ L (9 ~ I- h E m m E U m m m o y 3 o U c 3 d1 y U U 0 W �/� _ 'O C `�' o V o cn m m O o N d cm N W C m m Z L Z O N N D N N cli > m E o 0 CD m m ? m ° O N O m a g co f n W U U) -' m U °- W i L M U) - N D N NN N N N O } m L fd W W r U N rn > r ° 'E C ° C C C 0 aZi E c E c ro v U U Em Em a cm m � a U 0 Q 2m U O U U O p� A C m .O N y m > ro m a a c m m '> .� .c p ro p IL J v E m co Z L cc DQ a U U H L m C r G N 0 m N J m O ro N "O OC) « U N 0. X ° 0 C = O G 00 O N C _ N '� c C c N m U c E "N m m N o r2 0 r d O N ro C O N m m °i O1 c t0 N 0 o°oro F = cc € ro mE2 r) CL O c 0 o m f0 ro .� N a "m d ° > T 2 C W m �ro 3 C C .0 O m ro m Y N C L 'O d y E :_ Z m m m e e• > m n Y T O c m 2 c m CL 0 E Co.- a W CS' d m e C N ro m m °- O1 0 c m c c °c c m > Z O) O) fA m ,Q�,Q�� U) « d Ol'V L C•O m 3 E L w T U Z C O O cm " N O C c m m E c > t N ro Q7 V C Z c m _ N ca O J a m m p >_ _° a c X m c m c O rn n N O. EN cma mE 2`m EvE Nc8 `�' acicm > O. ° N o - = N N c m m m an b 'Z O U L' N E c ° m m N m m y a m. ° !� c Q Z d �U c $ m E E c m v °c o v m 0 2 m > U m y m a; �- �u v v m U m._ `o o _ V E a O O « 0 d Y ° N m C m C C O m E C3 y ° L �m om � m ° N2O E � N d N 0N 0 ' EE OZ Q n . (A ca OJ p N U V oo c o o ° 0€ ui o r O m y moo Lm � « m m p p CD v E N Lm m m Q C oo w � m co o� do m ,Tyo2 x :22 d > ca N m > m 'a) :N > m «� > m > 'm0 > d c a) O C� p m ro ¢ ro n v p 0 .E v aC o '0 aC n° a a a a a a a rn a � w o m m � o m m U v 3 m m > m o U a m cG m to - - m am ° m D c c o « m CM Cq cd ~ N ° N C U L C N d L >' m ~ O N J N m a L N > 0 � m '-' C .m .0 w O N N m E C Oa. « N ro >. W N c o m v L ) 0 ya).20 N z � Namccinx m m d ° ' m ° U m ° m > .m « m `� o m m a '° ❑ « m 'd U >,:a. L' m �' mz � « � 3min3c > > o N N m N L « V N fn "O y d m Q O ° C N 'Q�« 'C ._ O � ro 6 ro L to .°mm m LO c« E.> c E � m } 0 o ca 0 cc r m 3 m L .3 .° �, LL -O o .c mvU ` ° Q m o FL O l � 0 5 MD w0 > 0 - LO o vm mmi > LErEL ' m Na o m m Eaa N a a m O D (` m LL o a N O 0 n N V m m ` m m O m Im a m m« ❑ _ �0. m QY m o � is N C C N N O (n m m ° O c c e n L3 E cn _ a c L 'E °C m y m 3 m m c m °1 n« U D D m m m y 0 o " � m 3 t m s ° m LN. ° c romoLc, T mmu. 0 « ' E � mrnt'i azmoin � E N > m O a « n `� c m E o «_ y m O m Q C Cm m C N U C CD 0 O la U rA V E N n Y C n o O m E v ° c Q 3 Tm T ) E W mm m1- W mmvm mLmm omm W E 2 « � m w 0 ' 2 CD W n N m c m 3 in ci— c m X O C N J C - C � J N (A E m °- U N X 1° X C o L d o a 5 m c ' m a o m E y E m m O N o ° m M Cy m m m o 0 g N a c a y o. p i o u v W n m U c � o. U d N F 0 a Q m m m a U) cm ao to 4 n C m N O 'O m Em 00 � mro UmE �ncEN oo,LL a7 W a vi o N O m � C -0 N Y m a E co O > m a) m � � md3 7 V -mo «� m n N m N v� m ° Of -° LO) 0IO mm E N N m c m gym mm ` mo t n aO m E m N EE m ALL; € d N c 0 E « u c c m m v U o m m } LL m e o c _ LL 'D « y E U o J EE tom mNOm_ o ... N 'm^ > C y 7 N N a ° m 0 - O o - c n in m a o (7 U y U 3 w y C C 7 N V N '� a N N W N w ) .0) E E N j N N lD O W O a a 0 m m I— v cn E ❑ ❑ to U :� n W = N Y+ ca N N C V N W (1) a o o m o 0 O } Y N N M N N N W W m U U U N N � w U U V o o m `o v° g z .R Q fl_ N Q � c � ,. (n Cl) .E m U m m a m p c c c c m mm m O E EQCn a) T m T E O O c J U U U U cd 07 c m N C � O .� « .a) a) E m o L O .0 E N m ' C .� C to m N E N N d U E C O) J _ -° « m° m 0 C .� m O m O ° y a C « ° L a) CD c C ;a > my g o m '� v o. m 47 ~ L C N > N '- w m K d La m m C r N ' O N N N O N N C N N C c)J L 0 .2 T E m° m °c n ° ❑ O m € m at m O m e y U a l C it U N Q d O) CL O O O .N U LL c0 m « C m C a T 2 C C O m U 0 -5 U L O Q ««N c ?J � m m a O m m o c o L O o o c c n o Q. a) E m � L w o m ° m a ca 0 n - m > d n 3 c c Q c 'c m a `m c ° .N CW m w m m �' U) m CU) O ca ° °- =' pJ m Q ° E N c « W Y o o O E .m a o m c U o. m m JJ _ m y m 0 .N m a) m 'M m c_ o U m E m E c is M ° « o A Q1 m m is m m m m O m n nya m N « OIL o.a0 (J C C E O j C R O m ❑ O N Ow E m y C O O r N M q' qT RT Q Q Q Q P697 STAFF REPORT ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES 1 RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Veronica Fincher, Animal Services Director Subject: Approval of a Permanent Community Cat Program RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a Community Cat Program as standard policy for the placement of healthy feral cats. BACKGROUND In September of 2013, the City Council approved a five year Animal Center Strategic Plan that identified several action items to (1) reduce animal intake, (2) increase the quality of life of animals at the Center and (3) increase the live placement rate of dogs and cats. One of the approved action items was to pilot a Community Cat Program as an alternative for placing healthy feral cats and reducing their population in the City. Current Trap Neuter Return Program: Since 2006, The Animal Center has offered a Trap, Neuter and Return (TNR) program for feral cats. A feral cat is defined as an outdoor, free roaming cat that is "wild", not social, and not a pet cat owned by someone. Residents who are willing to become a caretaker of a feral cat they have trapped in our City can bring the animal to our Center to be spayed or neutered, vaccinated and returned to them for release back into the community at no charge. However, the Center receives approximately 150 to 200 additional feral cats per year that do not have a caretaker willing to take responsibility for them. In the past, staff would solicit adopters who were interested in outdoor only cats for the purposes of rodent control (mostly barn cats). However, adopters for these types of cats were always in low demand and if all attempts to find placement were unsuccessful, the end result was unfortunately euthanasia. Implementing a Community Cat Program: Community Cat Programs are largely becoming the accepted practice to address feral cats by many humane and municipal organizations. The premise behind a Community Cat Program is healthy feral cats that have adapted to living with minimal intervention are spayed and neutered and returned to the location they came from. By returning them to familiar territory, other cats will not move in to the area to fill the void that was created. Additionally, since they are sterilized and not reproducing, the number of feral cats in the community will reduce over time. In December of 2014, in addition to the TNR program, the Animal Center started a pilot Community Cat Program. Since that time, feral cats that entered our Animal Center and are not eligible for the TNR program are evaluated for the following criteria: P698 ANIMAL CENTER STAFF REPORT • Behavior: is the cat truly feral as opposed to a scared cat that may be adoptable with time. Is the cat an age in which socialization and rehabilitation to become a pet cat is not possible? • Health: is the cat in good body condition and overall health suggesting resources are available for it to thrive in the location it was living. • Environment: is the location the cat came in from safe for the cat to go back to. If all conditions are met, the feral cat is spayed or neutered, ear tipped, vaccinated against disease, treatAd for internal and external parasites and released back to the area it was found. Residents in the neighborhood are noted that the cat will come back and are given suggestions on how to humanely deter the cat from their property. By releasing the cat back to the environment it was already living in, the Center is accomplishing the following: • Through spay and neuter, reduce the number of unwanted litters that are born to feral cats, therefore reducing the overall number of feral cats in the community. • Reduce the number of healthy/treatable cats that may be euthanized. • Reduce unwanted behaviors (by spaying and neutering) such as spraying, yowling, marking and fighting that cause feral cats to sometimes be considered a nuisance in the community. • Microchip the cats and keep statistical information on the following: identify geographic regions were cats are residing for proactive targeted spay and neuter programs; identify community cats that may be returned to our Center with nuisance behavior, keep statistics on any undesired outcomes of our community cats to measure the program's success. Since December 2014, 69 cats have been altered and placed back in the community. Of the 69, 1 cat has been returned to the Center for continued nuisance behavior and 1 cat has been picked up deceased. The general response from residents has been understanding and positive acceptance about the program objectives. A handful of residents have had questions and concerns that were addressed and resolved on an individual basis. Respectfully Veroni ca Fincher Animal Services Director it 4tV p ‘,.,.. „,,p. . 0. • .... -:::, o i . . 3 Z mow C ... ., _ ....,... , 1 , ammil = ..... IM. 1114 > r, 0 > , ri) 0 g \ -0 -cr 0 clz _. ... o , .., a) r) m „p> .. . .1 . rn . _ $ x > ,.. [ > , MI i v . _ * I w4r--- IA XI ..0.11, ol — n z I, , ,, , 4. )41,400 F n 4r, . ., - . - - r - 1 J ;A . o t, G Z CO • • •. D D Z. = n E n c m = o CIQ N - w no 3 CL N -, � � 0 W C n a� D c� < a? -5 n pa e O f7 aQ I iI = = 3 CD D n. cD t r t D C O �* �+ 3 CD a) a CD Q..) M el —+ G4 O � F. O CL r+ 0 = CD CD I- (1) O 3 v �i 0 1 4"itilo) % 1.----S\ -0 1.r1 O T � l J /`r� . D -� �, 3 n' c � o = o (D • — r Z n CD O D - CD = rte* D sis N ( 0) 0 O� -•, -s = * -n O 0 + OJ r ' = O 3 n Q r. r} 3 CD 0- N c (p —• Z EU CD n D CD v Q CD (,/� O CD r _. CD r--r a1 �+ 3 F.., On cn `C 0 CU i 1. r � l ..., .- 5 `C (-1- Q C r � O rt Q n CD r+ Q O • p (D - CM rF CU 0 N - 62r - rfi CD C O CD D Q O —• r) CO l ! 1 I 1 I. t.. - O MI OP' . ,,,'. Ili • t N intr.,rte. n n lea) o n N, • • • CD 3 "" � � v -I _1 r~ (f) r) D rn (A C n �, n Z - > n C -0 C �(D -n ),.4 j (1) '-t- o re, n - r* • CU D' = a1 co cn n rr r+ c N cLJ —I r+ fD CD O Z z o n cn • n p v � cu ° 5• o_ '< -' 0.) N f Di v o o• rr (U < -• ,� D- D- rn ,< �, a) r+ _ C Z• o ° Q r) CU D m n C (D rn 3 r* cu CD 7 CD rt C z mac iiim O Gti CU 0 ; 3 pp alt L__. L�, n T Cu r C) m /`� `� I I I LI fD D Cu I rD x n m = CO 3 rD D) aD n f�'� Z < r l J r-r = . . O r+ _. n _ r+ ; 0 -n 4 z (D r —. r,� Cl.) FIT O —� C O }.j,.� _. c ' • m O ,< 0 70 �, rD CD 0 t� dq N r+ su . ..,.., c.., 0 ... ...„ ,___.„ 3 7 °+ CD 2. O 0) O n `� L .4 fD ora Cr). 0 n' �D r+ O n rD O 0- N can '{ n ° n, N r�D Cr • m n ,�CB -a a, Cu .- a- CD n r+ � * . O -D —CD o 3 C 117MIMI 1: N n ,� n �, �+ C<D <. r+ O 0- 5' Q o v 2 fi 0m O n r- D Q r+ O LA < Cl. CD VI DJ _ rD -1 r+ -' rD E N 0 CD p — C N rt � — o Cl.) rn CD CD r+ Cu r- 3 v.,. .. ,.......____ ...,. „.. ,:.., _ ..... • ._ ,:.,, .. .__ , ,_ .. D „-h n n 0 v CD C rri- e-1- CD D r+ +a) r In A. O p- D- < * , r�-r rD C Cr 0_ 0 . a C o 3 Cr mai r+ O v ..< , o 3 —. CD —% rD ac1 c D CU 3 = 3 3 CD -, , _.. •441§.) • • • 1...__10e on = 11 I I I D n c a) .ri 0-r fD n D r .? -C-C4 5▪ a) Fit). ti) na) t.,• -a CD r- n z cn fD r+ 0 rDD -o v - (I) n * r-r CD (D O CU CU CC 0_ r, 4 rD �a) CD 0 Q0 CTQ . rD m- 2 _ :, 7 z m p n' v, < O - CD co r. �_ rr . 3 vi 713 f-f- • Cr V < 3 v .• co QJ MI v N r • 'mt. 7� <' a) O o_ ,--1- _-r —h n O — r-r 0 D— •On aq cn' 0 0- v Cl.) M.rD (D 0 D, O • 0 Cl) O� v cp O ` 0 Q OD 0 = N (D —3 imiri CIQ CD —h I-I- = CO -' O (-1-f 3 rt a_ r+ n fD - 0) Di fD n n rD �, O `^ Q o 5• r+ 3 v, 0 C- = VI n CD D a) n n co 0 0 0) I • r+ 5• `� a:1 5' - --P , CM CD TM • • • • • � C1 n n I I I a'rQ CD ago o rte$. � N QJ CCD CD D CI) n) n n n rr ` , n n n) -' CM Ot CD rr r+ = rt o ---- n v m o 9' n- = rt (D CD CD N Q n -0— rr fl- CD n r-7 r ' 0 ar -n 4 >•-4 0 c n) n) cm n cn• - a • 0 0- 0 2 3 - N O C E^ n (713 -5 CD c Cr al r. fmi• .. 5• O - CD a 0 , ri. mow• 3 Os' CD . -7 — -N CD CD C 0 3 O 2, n CD \ < — C-r O O_ n) n) = '. 0!4. n rt .. C — CD n CD C •. o .0 (D rt• CAD i I- n 1 CD 3 n CD CD rt- CD �1 CD n) 0) CD �' Q D- CD -' cn ' cn CD ,C cu CD — /1 , =. rt 0 rr rr 2 n CD � c -z ( CD r a) -3 CD C 3 v' v' n rt C CD O CD < � C n- ) CCDD CD — n) — r..t. C CD 07:1 cr) rt O p to C Q CD C r+ —• Q 0� Qv v) (CD rr C CD Q) r+ v N' C D- = f-F c n co CU n n _< o rn-r -N 3 f"h to '< CD rF•• C C D v' O 3 o n) • '-F r+ n O — O N 1,-1,-.- C CD L/1 a D- = CAD D- fD m m- CD Dri N rr* 3 C 3 �' n) Q) -• cr r+ 3 ...< - O CD CD -In -3 - = � , O r0'C] � +O Cl/ C — Q r-'.. , , • r • • -0 1 410,./1 r a) p N r* -I 'a rn c — Q n � `` D o D �, rD o E LO E4 - 5 r) -< -1 n O rFD fD -0 O Q N 8 . -% cu — (12, -% 0- Is) 3 1-',.., g - nz E ' r+ CD ; f�') 2 S n D- D * _t, O N 3 7 c CT r+ -h �' ° z m — 'a n 0- . 2 0 0 7. CDD O � On CAD rD r<D ,I+ r) C2_ in c ft) rD v 70 ^ -5 a_ D 1_, 0 a) -1 ...1 z Z -s a -0 0- 3 cn l l - rD fD Q m CU C CD 0 tn a)cn N r) 1-. r) r-r -< CL , : 01111.,_...:2 rD rD V cu ,< rD a) D .. Q cu fl.l r+ � E 3 cl.) co r`DD n * 0 'a D O_ 0_ (1) -1 = C Cl_ vi O so CT e-4-c rD -5 co CD (/)/ rr+ r�-r 0 ••••• r-1- < CL O O CD C cu CU D O O D r+ D ,=-r f".. D -I 0_ O 0_ O •,,, , i 3 . ,. , _. . ..., . . ..:* . 1 . . .4 , . . , _. fit,1, . ,,)$,_1° , 4 . .,,,...w. 4, i . , I . . . I I I I 1 I I l_______.,_____„----———————111— i _. 1 ; L.......4' rD O an n O Cu ("1") Z -0 D r = m- o � - > n N O rD -n w 0 --, r+ r+ � spy CD = rD r+ v n v r+ O r+ r Z + r—D 0 c n z cu n r-r R,�-- O ....... n � - Di Q r+ 3 3 CD M 0 si " I-h 0 r , , ,, fit` rk I ! i 4:r .za P699 STS REPORT ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES RANCHO Date: July 15, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Veronica Fincher, Animal Services Director Subject: Approval of Additional Public Hours for the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Adoption Center RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a change in the Animal Center business hours to open earlier Tuesday through Sunday, increasing public hours by 14% from 42 per week to 48 per week, and closing Mondays to improve facility maintenance including pending renovations of the Center. BACKGROUND Since the Animal Center opened in 2006, the normal business hours have been Monday through Friday 1 pm to 7pm and Saturday and Sunday 12pm to 6pm. In total, the Center is currently open to the public 42 hours per week. Staff recommends changing the business hours on Tuesday through Friday to 1lam to 7pm and Saturday and Sunday 10am to 6pm, while closing Mondays (statistically, the Center's slowest business day). This would allow the Center to be open to the public 48 hours per week (six more hours than it is currently open). Services that will be improved by the change in business hours: • Improved customer service: closing Monday would increase the availability of office and adoption staff during other days of the week to help assist members of the public • Improved facility maintenance and overall cleanliness: closing Monday would allow staff to have the ability to deep clean, organize, and conduct routine maintenance on a weekly basis which contributes to a healthier environment for our pets and visitors • Improved enrichment programs and adoptions: by opening up earlier, visitors will have the opportunity to see dogs participate in playgroup and see them interact in a more natural fun environment • Expanded public spay and neuter services: our targeted public spay and neuter services could be hosted on Mondays, minimizing the impact on normal services Services not impacted by change in business hours: • Field Services: Animal Service Officers will continue to be available Monday through Sunday from Sam to 6pm for normal calls and 6pm to 8am for emergency services • Stray and lost animals: although dosed for normal services, staff will be available on Mondays to receive stray animals and assist the public in looking for their lost pets • Adoptions: the available date for animals will be extended by one day (to accommodate being closed on Mondays) and therefore adoptions will not be impacted 1 i P700 ANIMAL CENTER STAFF REPORT Comparison of Surrounding Animal Shelters: Animal Shelter Business Hours Rancho Cucamonga Animal Services Closed Mondays (proposed hours) Open 48 hours a week to the public Inland Valley Humane Society Closed Sundays Open 46 hours a week to public Upland Animal Services Open 7 days a week Open 42 hours a week to public San Bernardino County— Devore Open 7 days a week Open 57 hours a week to public San Bernardino City Shelter Closed Sunday and Monday Open 35 hours a week to public Riverside County Shelter Closed Sundays Open 41 hours to the public Respectfully submitted, V im" _te Veronica Fincher Animal Services Director E W C ,,, r Q GC c� y ILI co p Z Z V z ,. I Cu °' n3 H Q Z iii O 0 c VI Q o U I Q ,O u w i V e Q = v ,y-► V 0 Q < O 0 I s •- V Li a o ©r Z C g , y Q oC Q U it a '; cc ` .c a U inm z- S. I4 au y � [ ) V U ��` \ s ,5 ��+ .�;! I lam . .., i v / •'*r %,34:1;%,1".,,,'Lt• be i t i ■ :,-...-,:',7•,12:0::71V ii:S,0 . 1 ' r '. I . :,- • 4„,:4'...4.',%,*;„,,.c%4-„:,.$..0.,-..~'.--",:.4 x4.i V fi,r_ ;-i i ;?'? 4 ' i a r.I; _ _..-,•.'__ _, tp - . .,... ..,.; _c.,. ma ,s .: ...... ,, . 1 .„,a4......... • „, _ ,,..- ,, ., \.- ‘414„.. til_. 1.— = 0 ---t,- .n.. .I.- '1.111 111 . i. \ -tr,,:..I.7 tk ,. qp, ii / [ I -2....,%. - ,,Ati r , . , . 1„„ ur, tn fr. ■ C) - ' . sr , k • C ., - . _ •■ VI -•• = a:i E • • E s , ul 0_ a) r-- •— o to•• s_ = a 4 -0 c a) + a j o • -• , E-, o• a , , O. - E 0 )... 0. • 'e 4-1 a „....--1 -j.i. C c <*S• as) QJ rg -0 >••• ..cr UN = ir. • ,,, , rik-2,7 ' = Li) yl c — a) eta v) = = 0 -0 a , . @ t 4-i iig . li +-, ___ >•• 4-, - 4 — co co a 2 4-, tr , . E C = CD Z 0 . "bl• . 0 4-$ 0- lett-or,... It' SR"eire)$#*iti C 1•••• • • • ((3 0,0;1-'1 : 0.•,, ..- e. 43,4440 ,r=' i • w; 4 ti .1 �4u. " � ' I / CU • • C L a r O c O U E. } Y Q -, co o tin Na aJ •� C O LO 3 i Q • O u 0 c *' Q. � et 1�e V pp r0 i el � 0 xi —�J C al L- O 0 C 00 D 00 C - 3 O u 0 ! 0 0 t a ,12 O U c w co o o0 = a+.., � ;.,,it a)� I CU EE EOM' I ,. T‘rlimA c, .,' I 1• I O -/ O +J 3 ✓N Q) N i • I f 1 4-# in 0 O 4- 4- in >' CO i Q o0 o o I °' +' O o a G) » 0 0 It to - �^ -0 -o C v c u Q a CO -° f6 > - S v C v CO tn a) � E co E °' - .. L = itio L 0 — H ° O c C S- - " c .3 O n3 vi -p O • 4F a aJ O in Q ii '— C U co s_ •C U O o �tio o a) QJ CO 4' a` CD N _ iii �.. (n 00 " U _0 tn CD C C •� ©° N In co a) +J _a o Q CU c - No ca +, -0 CO Ugit a` ._LP U V) bp 0-0 (6 (1) +J 4- 04 0 ", • 144 i;