HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000/04/05 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
April 5, 2000
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
City Councilmembers
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem
Paul Biane, Coancilmember
James V. Curatalo, Councilmember
Bob Dutton, Councilmember
Jack Lam, City Manager
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City Office: 477-2700
City Council Agenda
April 5, 2000
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
Roll Cail: Alexander Biane
Curatalo Dutton , and
'Williams
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of a Proclamation declaring the April 9 - 15 as "Victim's
Rights Week" in Rancho Cucamonga.
Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing the accomplishments of the
Ruth Musser Middle School Competitive Cheerleading Squad.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes:
February 16, 2000
March 1,2000
March 15, 2000
2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 3/8/00, 3/15/00 and 3/22/00 and
Payroll ending 3/2/00 for the total amount of $2,555,704.47.
3. Approval to declare Surplus Miscellaneous City-Owned Equipment.
4. Approval of a Resolution Ordering the Annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District
Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 98-17, located at the southwest corner of
Hermosa Avenue and Arrow Highway, submitted by Mike Giurbino.
1
17
23
City Council Agenda
April 5, 2000
RESOLUTION NO. 00-052
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 98-17
Approval of a Resolution approving the application for California
Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction annual payment by
the California Department of Conservation Division of Recycling.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-053
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
APPLICATION FOR CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE
CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER
REDUCTION ANNUAL PAYMENT BY THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CONSERVATION DIVISION OF RECYCLING
Approval of disposition of a portion of City-owned property, generally
within the Northtown area, located on the south side of Feron
Boulevard, west of Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Northtown Housing
Development Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-054
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND
A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, A COPY
OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS
EXHIBIT "D" AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO
BE DELIVERED TO THE PERSON NAMED
THEREIN
Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 99-08,
located at the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street,
submitted by Rancho Cucamonga Retirement Residence LLC.
25
28
30
31
33
39
City Council Agenda
April 5, 2000
RESOLUTION NO. 00-055
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR CUP 99-08
RESOLUTION NO. 00-056
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 99-08
Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 99-52, located
on the southwest corner of San Marino Street and Charles Smith
Avenue, submitted by OItmans Construction Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-057
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR DR 99-52
RESOLUTION NO. 00-058
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DFISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 99-52
Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and
Monumentation Cash Deposit for Tract 13759, located on the west side
of Haven Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad, submitted by
Forecast Group L.P., and release of previously submitted Improvement
Agreement and monumentation Cash Deposit previously accepted by
City Council on January 20, 1999, from Overland Haven, LLC
42
43
46
49
50
53
City Council Agenda
April 5, 2000
RESOLUTION NO. 00-059
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPRQVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR
TRACT 13759 AND RELEASING THE
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL
ON JANUARY 20, 1999
10. Approval to renew the contract with Holiday Printing (CO 97-039) for the
printing of the Grapevine in the amount of $70,572.00 for four issues.
11. Approval of request to enter into Communications Site Ground Lease
Agreement at Heritage Park between Cox Communications and the City
of Rancho Cucamonga (CO 00-015) for the purpose of installing a
Wireless Communication Facility for Cox's Personal Communication
Service.
12. Approval to accept bids received, and award and authorize the
execution of the Contract in the amount of $128,639.06 ($116,944.60
plus 10% contingency) to the apparent low bidder, K.A.S. Equipment &
Rental, Inc., (CO 00-016) for the construction of the ADA 1999/2000
Access Ramp and Drive Approach Improvements at various locations
along Hermosa Avenue, Haven Avenue, 6th Street and Arrow Route, to
be funded from Measure t Funds, Account Nos. 32-4637-9804 and 32-
4637-9113, and TDA ART 3 Funds, Account No. 16-4637-9106.
13. Approval to accept bids received, waive any and all minor irregularities
in the bidding documents submitted by the apparent low bidder, and
award and authorize the execution of the Contract in the amount of
$245,952.84 ($223,593.49 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent low
bidder, RVC Roadway Construction, Inc., (CO 00-017) for the
construction of the Sapphire Street Pavement Improvements from Moon
Coud to Almond Street, to be funded from Measure I Funds, Account
No. 32-4637-9606.
14. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the Contract for the
Construction of 1999/2000 FY Local Street Rehabilitation, Overlay, to
RVC Roadway (CO 00-018) in the amount of $152,164.32 ($138,331.20
plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Measure I, Account No. 32-
4637-9113.
15. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the Contract for the
Construction of 1999/2000 FY Local Street Rehabilitation, Slurry Seal,
to California Pavement (CO 00-019) in the amount of $231,040.60
($210,036.91 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Measure I,
Account No. 32-4637-9113.
56
57
61
63
68
75
81
City Council Agenda
April 5, 2000
16. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance
Bond, accept a deposit as a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of
Completion for Improvements for CUP 98-17, located on the southwest
corner of Hermosa Avenue and Arrow Route, submitted by Michael A.
Giuribino.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-060
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 98-17 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance
Bonds, accept Maintenance Bonds, and file a Notice of Completion for
Improvements for Tracts 135641-1,-2,-3,-4, submitted by Standard
Pacific Corporation, located nodch of Wilson, between Wardman Bullock
and San Sevaine
RESOLUTION NO. 00-061
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 13564 -1,-2,-
3,-4 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
18.
Approval to accept the Vineyard Avenue Bus Bay Project, Contract No.
99-095, as complete, release the Bonds, and authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract
amount of $84,557.00.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-062
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE VINEYARD
AVENUE BUS BAY PROJECT AS COMPLETE,
AND AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION
93
95
96
99
100
102
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
City Council Agenda
April 5, 2000
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 99-01 - CATELLUS - A request to amend the Industrial
Area Specific Plan definition of Specialty Building Supplies and Home
Improvements to conditionally permit buildings over 25,000 square feet.
ORDINANCE NO. 620
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVtNG INDUSTRIAL
AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01,
AMENDING THE INDUSTRIAL AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN DEFINITION OF SPECIALTY
BUILDING SUPPLIES AND HOME
IMPROVEMENTS TO CONDITIONALLY
PERMIT BUILDINGS OVER 25,000 SQUARE
FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
CONSIDERATION OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 99-01 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A
request to amend the Terra Vista Community Plan to redesignate the
land use district for Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 14786 from Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Elementary School, located
at 7889 East Elm Avenue -APN: 1077-421-81.
ORDINANCE NO. 621
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01,
AMENDING THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY
PLAN LAND USE MAP TO REDESIGNATE
THE LAND USE DISTICT FOR PARCEL 1 OF
PARCEL MAP 14786 FROM MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL (8 TO 14 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) TO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,
LOCATED AT 7889 EAST ELM AVENUE AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
(APN: 1077-042-88)
103
117
120
144
City Council Agenda
April 5, 2000
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY A WAIVER OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION DESIGN POLICY REQUIRING THE USE OF TILE
ROOFING MATERIAL FOR THE RESIDENCE OF CHARLES BADDER
AT 10336 HIDDEN FARM ROAD
2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH PRIMA
FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON VARIOUS STREETS
ORDINANCE NO. 622
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE
REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS
ON CERTAIN STREETS
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING SECTION 2.12.010 OF CHAPTER
2.12 OF TITLE II OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO THE LOCATION OF REGULAR CITY COUNCIL
MEETINGS AND DETERMINING THE DAYS, PLACE AND TIME FOR
HOLDING REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 421A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.12.010
OF CHAPTER 2.12 OF TITLE II OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO THE LOCATION OF
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
RESOLUTION NO. 90-227A
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE DAYS,
PLACE AND TIME FOR HOLDING REGULAR
MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
149
175
185
194
196
197
City Council Agenda
April 5, 2000
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. CONSIDERATION TO AWARD AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT TO
BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION (CO 00-020) FOR
PREPARATION OF A TRAIL SYSTEM MASTER PLAN WITHIN THE
FORMER SOUTHERN PACIFIC BALDWIN PARK RAILROAD
CORRIDOR (PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY) IN THE AMOUNT OF
$152,000, TO BE FUNDED FROM VALLEY MEASURE I TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT FUNDS
DEPOSITED BY THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED
GOVERNMENTS INTO ACCOUNT NO. 01-3901-7310 (FY 00/01 )
CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO UPDATE THE CITY'S
SMOKING ORDINANCE
CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION ON A POLICY FOR INSTALLATION OF
SCOREBOARDS AT CITY PARKS
198
200
201
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the city Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
City Council Agenda
April 5, 2000
L. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on March 30 2000, seventy two (72) hours prior to
the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS:
LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54957.6 TO GIVE GEORGE RIVERA, ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES MANAGER, PAMELA EASTER, DEPUTY CITY
MANAGER~ AND LARRY TEMPLE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND
CONFER PROCESS.
PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS WITH REAL PROPERTY
NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WEST OF EAST AVENUE (APN: 229-
041-09); NEGOTIATING PARTIES, WILLIAM J. O'NEIL, CITY
ENGINEER, AND DAN JAMES, SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER,
REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING
PRICE.
February 16, 2000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, February 16,
2000, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:06 p.m. by Mayor William J.
Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Willjams, and
Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James
Markman, City Attorney; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Jim Frost, City Treasurer;
Shelly Munson, Info Systems Specialist; Joe Kamrani, Sr. Info Systems Specialist; Larry Henderson,
Principal Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bill
Makshanoff, Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon,
Management Analyst II; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Rodney Hoops, Police Department; Duane Baker,
Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; and Debra J. Adams,
City Clerk.
B, ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Councilmember Williams announced that Mayor Alexander had been selected to serve as Chair
of the City Selection Committee. She pointed out this committee is comprised of all Mayors within
San Bernardino County and that this is an honor that Mayor Alexander was selected to serve as
Chair.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. Malissa McKeith, 4993 Ginger Court, on behalf of CURE, presented background information
regarding the levee removal near the Haven View Estates project. She commented on the safety
study they are requesting regarding this. She told about Senators Boxer and Feinstein that are
supporting this study as well. She talked about correspondence pertaining to this. She stated they
are asking for FEMA to tell them if this is safe or not and referred to an Indemnification Letter they
are asking various agencies to sign.
C2. John Lyons talked about his organization called SOC (Save Our Children), which pertains to the
high school proposed on Banyan and Miliiken. He commended the City Council for their help to get
the freeway changed so that it is safer for the kids going to and from school.
C3. Robin Jenson wanted to talk about the meeting they had with the Charley Joint Union High
School District regarding the name for the proposed high school. She asked that the Council help
and support them in getting the name changed from Los Osos High School. She stated the
community did not like the name of Los Osos. She stated the people would like this to be named
City Council Meeting Minutes
February 16, 2000
Page 2
something that would go more with the area. She stated people are upset and want to get involved
in the naming of the school. She asked that the Council go with them to the School District Board
meeting to help them. She felt the kids should be able to be involved with the naming and also
choosing the colors and mascot for the school.
Mayor Alexander pointed out that the City does not get involved with school district matters because
they do not have jurisdiction with school issues.
Ms. Jenson stated she understood that, but would like to get this on the next agenda to discuss.
C4. Lori Coy stated they want to change the name of the high school. She felt the mascot could be
called Los Osos but not the name of the school.
C5. Steve Figueroa invited the Council to a Latino event this coming weekend and pointed out he
liked the name of Los Osos and felt it was appropriate.
C6. Kathy Wyant, 4999 Ginger Court, asked that the Council sign the Indemnification Agreement as
discussed by Ms. McKeith, and felt they should go along with the safety study.
C7. Bob Christiano stated he had a copy of the FEMA letter Ms. McKeith referred to dated February
16 and commented on this. He asked Ms. McKeith if they would indemnifiJ him and read a letter
from FEMA to Ms. McKeith.
C8. Leo Orinvanos, Carriage Drive, felt if things were safe, why won't everyone sign the
Indemnification Agreement.
C9. Malon Sampson, Haven View Estates, stated he has some information about Mr. Christiano's
tactics. He felt there were no problems signing the Indemnification Letter if people felt the situation is
safe,
C10. James Simpson, 8740 White Oak, stated if the ARMY Corps says this is safe, he did not feel
the City or Mr. Christiano need to sign the Indemnification Agreement because of the reputation of
the ARMY Corps.
Cll. Susan Bowedy stated she is representing many people in the community who do not like the
rapid pace of development within the City. She stated she would like to get a map of what is owned
by the City and what is privately owned.
C12. Harry Gupta of Rancho Cucamonga for 20 years, stated he is concerned about the removal of
the levee. He felt the levee was like insurance. He stated he is not against Lauren Development,
but just wants to be safe. He felt the City should look for another piece of land for Lauren to build on.
C13. Lori Drakes stated she was not in support of the name of Los Osos for the new high school
and asked the City Council to help them get this changed.
Jack Lain, City Manager, stated he would like Mr. O'Neil to give a report on the history of the levee
and also the flood protection.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, reported to the Council the information requested by the City Manager.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated he has read the Indemnification Agreement and reported he
suggested some time ago that everyone go in together and pay for a safety study which never
happened. He felt it would be a good idea if someone could facilitate a land swap with the
developer. He stated as far as the Indemnification Agreement was concerned, he could not advise
his client to pick up any liability that isn't theirs.
City Council Meeting Minutes
February 16, 2000
Page 3
D. CONSENTCALENDAR
Jack Lain, City Manager, stated there is a correction to the account number for item D5 which has
been distributed in a memo to the Council.
D1. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 31, 2000.
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 1/5/00, 1/12/00, 1/19/00, 1/26/00 and 2/2/00, and Payroll
ending 1/6/00 and 1120100 for the total amount of $5,086,896.10.
D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the ADA 1999/2000 Access
Ramp and Drive Approach Improvements to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
standards generally located along Haven.and Hermosa Avenues and Arrow Route, to be funded from
Account Nos. 16-4637-9106 and 32-463,7-9804.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-019
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ADA 1999/2000 ACCESS RAMP AND
DRIVE APPROACH IMPROVEMENTS" IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO
RECEIVE BIDS
D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Sapphire Street
Pavement Improvements from Moon Court to Almond Street, to be funded from Account No. 32-4637-
9606.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-020
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "SAPPHIRE STREET PAVEMENT
IMPROVEMENTS FROM MOON COURT TO ALMOND STREET" IN
SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D5.Approval to appropriate $7,500 awarded by the California State Library into Library Expenditure
account. (ACCOUNT NUMBER CORRECTED)
De. Approval of a request to Summarily Vacate a Storm Drain Easement, located northerly and on
Caltrans proposed frontage road, approximately 285 feet south of existing centerline of Highland
Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-021
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY' ORDERING THE
VACATION OF A STORM DRAIN EASEMENT, LOCATED NORTHERLY
AND ON THE PROPOSED CALTRANS FRONTAGE ROAD
D7. Approval of a request to Summarily Vacate a Storm Drain/Ingress and Egress Easement north of
Highland Avenue, west of Etiwanda Avenue, V167--APN: 225-411-01.
City Council Meeting Minutes
February 16, 2000
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 00-022
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE
VACATION OF A STORM DRAIN/INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT
ON LOT 1 OF TRACT 13812, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF
HIGHLAND AVENUE AND WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, V-167--
APN: 225411-01
D8. Approval of an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for the Traffic Signal
Installations at Fourth Street and Santa Anita Avenue, and Fourth Street and Barrington Avenue,
submitted by Catellus Development Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-023
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
INSTALLATIONS AT FOURTH STREET AND SANTA ANITA AVENUE
AND FOURTH STREET AND BARRINGTON AVENUE
D9. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for
CUP 97-23, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue, submitted by
Samir A. Lakkees and Robin E. Lakkees, Trustees of the Lakkees Family Living Trust and Nancy J.
Lakkees-Shaffer.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-024
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 97-23
RESOLUTION NO. 00-025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR CUP 97-23
D10. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR
99-40, located at the northwest corner of Fourth Street and Archibald Avenue, submitted by Airport
Corporate Center, LLC
RESOLUTION NO. 00-026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 99-40
City Council Meeting Minu~s
Februa~ 16,2000
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 00-027
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR DR 9940
D11. Approval to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Xerox Corporation (CO 00-004)
to provide document cost per copy service through San Bernardino County Piggy-Back Agreement
#99-1181 in the amount of $149,048.00 from Account No. 01-4245-6028.
D12. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the Contract for City Hall carpet replacement,
in the amount of $279,770.00 ($254,336.00 plus 10% contingency) to be apparent low bidder, Shaw
Contract Flooring (Inland Empire) (CO 00-005) of Ontario, California, to be funded from Fund 17-
51000.
D13. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Development Review 94-16, generally
located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Ameron,
Incorporated. (REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION)
RESOLUTION NO. 00-028
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-16
D14. Approval of release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 3SM91192600 in the amount of
$15,440.00 for DR 95-02, located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, east of White Oak Avenue.
D15. Approval to accept the Summit Avenue Street Improvements, East Avenue to 1000" east of
East Avenue, Contract No. 99-059 as complete, release the bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to
file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $148,175.50.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-029
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SUMMIT AVENUE STREET
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 99-059, AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
D16. Approval to accept the ADA Access Ramps along Archibald Avenue from Base Line Road south
to Sixth Street and various locations, Contract No. 99-053, as complete, and authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $122,540.25.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-030
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ADA ACCESS RAMPS
ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE, FROM BASE LINE ROAD SOUTH TO
SIXTH STREET AND VARIOUS LOCATIONS, AS COMPLETE, AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION
City CouncilMeeting Minutes
Februa~ 16,2000
Page 6
D17. Approval to accept the Construction of the FY 1998/99 Local Street Rehabilitation, Slurry Seal
for Various Locations, Contract No. 99-064, as complete, release the bonds, and authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $206,363.07.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-031
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF
FY 1998/99 LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION, SLURRY SEAL FOR
VARIOUS LOCATIONS, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION
D18. Approval to accept the 4th Street Rehabilitation and Storm Drain Project, Contract No. 99-071,
as complete, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final
contract amount of $560,226.86.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-032
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE 4TM STREET
REHABILITATION AND STORM DRAIN PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 99-
071, AS COMPLETE, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of item D13 and to include the
correction to item D5 as stated by the City Manager. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D13. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Development
Review 94-16, generally located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue,
submitted by Ameron, Incorporated.
Councilmember Dutton stated he would have to abstain from voting on this matter because of a conflict.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-028
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-16
MOTION: Moved by Willlares, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 00-028. Motion carried
unanimously 4-0-0-1 (Dutton abstained).
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
No items Submitted.
City Council Meeting Minutes
February 16, 2000
Page ?
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
F1. CONSIDERATION OF 2000 - 2004 CONSOLIDATED PLAN - The opportunity for public
participation in the development of Housing and Community Development Needs for the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program.
Staff report presented by Tom Grahn, Associate Planner.
Councilmember Willlares stated there is a group of collaborative nonprofits that Dianna Mitchell is
involved with. She asked if they had been notified of this to see what their input is.
Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, stated he was not sure but would check into this. He stated there
were ads in the newspaper to get the word out about this program.
Councilmember Williams felt they definitely needed to be involved with this project, and felt possibly
the City should meet with them to discuss their need. She stated Ms. Mitchell could address this
when public comments are opened up.
Councilmember Biane stated he and Councilmember Williams met with Planning Department staff to
try to balance out the money for capital improvements and other various groups and looked forward
to hearing from everyone and getting input as to what their needs are.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
Brian Hunt, Project Sister, told about their program and stated if they get any CDBG money it
would be well spent.
Sue Tong, Project Sister, also told about their program.
Sandra Floyd, with Campfire Girls for Crimebusters Day Camp, talked about their program.
Diana Lee Mitchell, YMCA and the Community Services Network Group, suggested their
Community Services Network Group meet to discuss their needs for CDBG funding and bring
back a report to the City Council.
Jim Frost with Etiwanda Historical Society, talked about the Society and what they do.
Miriam Gandell, Foothill Family Shelter, talked about their program and asked for the Council
to support so they can continue with their work.
Jess Torrez, Inland Media Board told about his program.
Arte Jones, Inland Valley Council of Chambers, talked about their program and the importance
of it.
Bill Meyers, House of Ruth and also with the Foothill Family Shelter, told abut their program
and the people they serve. They thanked the Council for their past support and stated they
looked forward to the future.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Biane asked if the census count could help with funding for CDBG requests.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated they do expect a slight increase, but that it is not expected
to increase due to the population count.
City Council Meeting Minutes
February 16,2000
Page 8
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated population is important and felt this should be pointed out.
Councilmember Willlares stated she did not want it implied that the census was not important.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated he did not mean to imply that the census count was not
important.
Councilmember Willjams felt the information presented tonight should be considered and felt they
should be able to give input into the final report.
ACTION: Report received and filed, with direction given to staff as previously stated.
A recess was taken at 8:42 p.m.
present.
The meeting reconvened at 8:54 p.m. with all Councilmembers
Noltems Submi~ed.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. REQUEST TO ISSUE A RESOLUTION tN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 14---THE CALIFORNIA
READING AND LITERACY IMPROVEMENT AND PUBLIC LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND
RENOVATION BOND ACT OF 2000
Staff report presented by Deborah Clark, Library Director.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comments. There being no response, public comments
were closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-033
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ENDORSING PROPOSITION 14, THE
CALIFORNIA READING AND LITERACY IMPROVEMENT AND PUBLIC
LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION BOND ACT OF 2000
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 00-033. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0
H2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO'S BOOKING FEE
SUPPLEMENTAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (CO 99-031A) ELIMINATING THE COUNTY'S
FEBRUARY 11, 2000 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
Staff report presented by Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager.
Mayor Alexander if there was any way to completely do away with the booking fee.
City Council Meeting Minutes
February 16, 2000
Page 9
Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager, stated all of the City Managers that are contract cities for
police services are continuing to work with the County on an ongoing basis to try to lower the booking
fee or equal the current reimbursement we are currently getting from AB 1662.
Mayor Alexander asked what the current reimbursement was.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it is currently three hundred and some odd thousand dollars and is
based on two fiscal years ago. He stated we just received the check.
Councilmember Dutton asked if there are some counties that are eliminating the fee.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated yes.
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 99-031A. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
H3. APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $89,839, AWARDED BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANTS PROGRAM
Staff report presented by Rodney Hoops, Police Chief.
MOTION: Moved by Blanc, seconded by Curatalo to approve the appropriation as recommended by
staff. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. REPORT ON BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PATHS AND SPEED LIMIT REDUCTION ON SAPPHIRE
Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer,
ACTION: Council directed staff to continue with the investigation.
12. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
ACTION: Report received and filed.
13. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL' COMMUNITY FOUNDATION'S SUBCOMMITTEE'S
RECOMMENDATIONS TO FILL THE ONE VACANCY ON THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
Staff report presented by Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager.
MOTION: Moved by Blanc, seconded by Curatalo to approve the subcommittee's recommendation.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0
City Council Meeting Minutes
February 16, 2000
Page 10
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
J1. Councilmember Dutton stated he would like to put the high school naming issue on the agenda
even though it is not within the City's jurisdiction.
Councilmember Willjams stated she has been contacted by a lot of residents about this and felt the
people should be able to speak.
Councilmember Curatalo felt this would allow people the opportunity to use the Council as a
sounding block, but added the Council does not have jurisdiction over the school district.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss Labor
Negotiations per Government Code Section 54957.6 to give Larry Temple, Administrative Services
Director, direction in regards to the meet and confer process. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 9:12 p.m. No action was taken in executive session.
Respectfully submitted,
Approved: *
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
March 1, 2000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 1, 2000, in
the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 7:19 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Willjams, and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; William Curley,
Deputy City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Larry Temple, Administrative
Services Director; Lorraine Phone, Info Systems Analyst; Sam Davis, Info Systems Analyst; Rick
Gomez, Community Development Director; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Sal Salazar, Associate
Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; John Thomas, Plan Check
Manager/Fire; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst It;
Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Chief Dennis Michael,
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Lieutenant David Lau, Police Department; Duane Baker,
Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Jennifer Haruyama,
Management Analyst I; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing March as Red Cross Month.
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Gene Jeffers, Duane Baker and Rob Van Riel.
B2. Presentation of a check for $10,000 from the Friends of the Library to the City Council for the
purchase of library books.
The check was presented by Donna Bradshaw and Deborah Clark. Deborah Clark mentioned the
telethon scheduled for March 24 - 26, 2000 which would televise on channel 3 and also asked that
everyone donate a $20 book.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he will sponsor $50 for every Councilmember to dance at the telethon.
B3. Presentation of the Official Census 2000 Complete Count shirt from the City's Complete Count
Committee.
Sal Salazar, Associate Planner, presented tee shirts to the Council and informed them about the
importance of the census count.
City Council Minutes
March 1, 2000
Page 2
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. Gary Kendrick talked about Vanguard Plastics lawsuit pertaining to the Utility Tax, and stated he is
disappointed the City Attorney is going to file an appeal. He felt this should be put on the ballot for
the people of the City to vote on.
C2. John Lyons stated he is a Utility Tax supporter and told about the mason why the Utility Tax was
approved which was to help pay for emergency services. He felt the tax was needed,
C3. Jackie Bolda asked that the Council educate the people as to what the Utility Tax money is spent on.
Jack Lam, City Manager, asked that the Council add an executive session as follows:
To Discuss Labor Negotiations per Government Code Section 54957.6, to give George Rivera,
Administrative Services Manager, Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, and Larry Temple,
Administrative Services Director, direction in regards to the meet and confer process.
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to add the executive session as indicated above by the
City Manager. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
D. CONSENTCALENDAR
D1. Approval of Minutes: January 19, 2000
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/9/00 and 2/16/00 and Payroll ending 2/3/00 for the total
amount of $3,536,032.00
D3. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for Texaco (transfer of
license), Equilon Enterprises, LLC, 11289 Base Line Rd.
D4. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Jersey's Pizza of
Rancho Cucamonga (transfer of license), Allyn Hoover Kruse, Karen Jeanne Kruse and David Martin
Widor, 11849 Foothill Blvd., Unit A.
D5. Approval of a Resolution approving the application for grant funds for a Used Oil Recycling Block
Grant Sixth Cycle Application from the Used Oil Recycling Fund under the Used Oil Recycling
Enhancement Act.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-034
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR
GRANT FUNDS FROM THE USED OIL RECYCLING FUND UNDER THE
USED OIL RECYCLING ENHANCEMENT ACT
D6. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records pursuant to California
Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal
citations.
City Council Minutes
March 1, 2000
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 00-035
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF
CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH
IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER
APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES
D7. Approval for the replacement purchase of fleet vehicles from various dealerships located within
California, selected through request for proposal in the amount of $60,335.08, funded from Fund 72-
4225-7045 and $47,900.00 from Fund 1-4647-7045, and Funds 40, 41,43, 45, 46, 4130-7045.
D8. Approval to award and authorization of the contract in the amount of $118,310.84 ($107,555.31,
plus 10% contingency) for the construction of the Beryl Street Rehabilitation from Base Line Road to
Cielito Street, to the apparent low bidder, Laird Construction Co. Inc. (CO 00-006), to be funded from
Measure I Fund, Account No. 32-4637-9518.
D9. Approval to award and execution of Professional Services Agreement to Park Specialities (CO 00-
007) of Fallbrook, California, for the installation of poured-in-place rubber playground surfacing at
Etiwanda Creek Park playground, in the amount of $84,495.00 ($76,814.00 plus 10% contingency), to
be funded from Fund 20, Account No. 20-4532-9912.
D10. Approval of an Agreement (CO 00-008) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District establishing
financial participation in the Foothill-Hermosa Storm Drain Project.
D11. Approval of an Agreement with LSA Associates, Inc., (CO 00-009) for the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report for General Plan Amendment 99-06, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
Amendment 99-03, Development District Amendment 99-06, Parcel Map 15427, and Conditional Use
Permit 99-63.
D12. Approval of an Agreement with San Bernardino Associated Governments (CO 00-010) for the
preparation of a Trail System Master Plan within the former Southern Pacific Baldwin Railroad Corridor.
MOTION: Moved by Willlares, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
No Items Submitted.
No Items Submitted.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No Items Submitted.
City Council Minutes
March 1, 2000
Page 4
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. CONSIDERTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF JUVENILE
ACCOUNTABILITY INCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT (JAIBG) FUNDS TO THE REGIONAL JUVENILE
CRIME ENFORCEMENT COALITION (RJCEC) IN SUPPORT OF AN INTER-AGENCY
PARTNERSHIP TO PROMOTE YOUTH, SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY SAFETY
Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input, There being no response, public comments were
closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-036
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF
JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY INCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT (JAIBG)
FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
PLANNING (OCJP) TO THE REGIONAL JUVENILE CRIME
ENFORCEMENT COALITION (RJCEC)
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve Resolution No. 00-036. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
H2. CONSIDERATION OF A CO-SPONSORHIP OF HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH'S 2ND
ANNUAL SOAPBOX CLASSIC AND MEGA-FUN PLAY DAY TO BE HELD ON MAY 31, 2000, AT THE
EPICENTER SPORTS COMPLEX AND WAIVE ASSOCIATED FEES AND CHARGES
Staff report presented by Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II.
Pastor Dave Burns of the Hillside Community Church, stated the event was very successful last year and
expected it to be even larger this year. He asked for the Council's support.
Councilmembers Curatalo and Biane thanked the Hillside Church for the wonderful event that took place
last year.
Jackie Bolda stated the church really pulled together and even assisted single Moms with making a car
for their kids.
Councilmember Willjams pointed out the event is free admission.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to co-sponsor the event and to waive the fees.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
H3. CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND RECREATION
COMMISSION TO WAIVE BASE RENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER TO ALLOW
FOR ITS USE BY LOCAL HIGH SCHOOLS FOR TWO DOUBLEHEADER BASEBALL GAMES FOR A
ONE-YEAR TRIAL BASIS
Staff report presented by Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II.
James Clopton spoke on behalf of the Park and Recreation Commission and asked for the Council's
support.
City Council Minutes
March 1, 2000
Page 5
Mayor Alexander stated he hopes this goes through on a trial basis.
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve the Park and Recreation Commission's
recommendation. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
H4. CONSIDERATION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH L. D. KING, INC. (CO
00-011), TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE METROLINK STATION
EXPANSION, PHASE II PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $219,718.40 ($199,744.00 PLUS 10%) TO
BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 151-4637-9932
Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer.
Mayor Alexander thanked General Dynamics for assisting with this project.
Councilmember Willlares suggested people'go to Union Station in Los Angeles just to see the renovation
of this.
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve CO 00-011. Motion carried unanimously
5-0.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE CONCEPT OF A RED LIGHT AUTOMATED CAMERA
ENFORCEMENT PILOT PROGRAM TO BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Staff report presented by Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I.
Councilmember Dutton reported the signal light at Haven and Foothill changes too quickly for some
' directions.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated the City is working with Caltrans on this signal to get this taken care of.
Councilmember Biane asked if the cameras can be moved to various locations.
Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I, stated yes they could be moved or rotated around.
Councilmember Biane asked what the cost would be to hire an officer to do the same thing.
Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I, stated it would be about $100,000 per year and added the
camera would work 24 hours a day.
Councilmember Willlares asked whom the tickets would be mailed to.
Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I, stated it would go to the registered owner of the car.
Councilmember Willlares pointed out that even if a car does not have a front license plate, the camera is
able to get a picture of the rear plate. She stated only the photo of the driver would show in the picture,
not any of the other passengers in the car.
MOTION: Moved by Willjams, seconded by Curatalo to approve staffs recommendation, Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
City Council Minutes
March 1, 2000
Page 6
12. DISCUSSION OF NAME FOR THE NEW HIGH SCHOOL (Oral Discussion)
Councilmember Dutton stated that even though the City does not have jurisdiction over the schools,
people were contacting him about the naming of the high school. He stated his reason for putting this on
the agenda was to help with the healing process for this issue and to give the people an opportunity to
explain themselves because some people felt they did not get to do so at the school board meetings.
Councilmember Williams felt it should be on the agenda and agreed with Councilmember Dutton. She
felt this was an opportunity for a sounding board.
Mayor Alexander stated he is in disagreement to step into something that is the school district's
jurisdiction. He felt complaints should go to the school board and not the City Council. He stated the City
also submitted names which were not chosen.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council were:
Jackie Bolda stated she was part of the naming process and pointed out she is also an employee of
the school district. She continued to talk about the process the board went through to choose the
name.
Dee Donado, a history teacher from Alta Loma High School, told how the name Los Osos came
about. He talked about how Rancho Cucamonga was named and that people did not like it, but felt
Los Osos was a good name.
Steve Figueroa stated he supported the name of Los Osos. He stated he and others want safe
schools.
Ralph Hernandez stated he disagreed that the City Council does not have jurisdiction over the
schools. He encouraged the Council to assist those that don't like the name.
Jackie Bolda stated Ray Sario told her this will not be open for discussion again.
Robin Jenson, Cross Keys Drive, stated she has not heard any racial matters being the issue. She
stated the community is upset that people did not have a say in the naming of the high school. She
thought at one time the board was going to call it Banyan High School, but then changed the name
just a couple of weeks before voting on it. She felt the school board did not involve the community
in their decision. She stated she is meeting with Barry Cadwahlader to talk about a voting process
to name this high school. She stated they want a part of the naming process. She also felt parking
at the new high school would be an issue, which she felt the Council would be addressing on a
future agenda.
Jeremy Segal of Etiwanda High School, stated he has not heard people complaining about the
name being Hispanic, but did not like the name of Los Osos Bears. He stated he did have a
problem with the name and felt it should be a different name.
Erin Segal of Etiwanda High School, felt everyone in the community should come together to come
up with a name.
Cathy Hedrow stated she concurred with what has been already stated. She stated Chaffey High
School District solicited their input and did not listen to what they wanted. She did not feel this was
an ethnic matter, but should be decided by the community.
Lorraine Bate stated she did not have a choice in the matter and does not like that. She stated
nothing came home to the parents about naming the new high school.
City Council Minutes
March 1, 2000
Page ?
Lauren Bolda of Summit Intermediate, stated she is proud of the name Los Osos and will be the
first graduating class.
Laurie Driggs of Copper Court, stated she is in support of reopening the discussion of renaming the
high school. She stated there has been a reaction to the name and felt the school board should
listen to what people are saying. She felt this was an opportunity to bring the community together.
She stated ethnic is not an issue.
Melanie Brooks, 10074 Waterford, talked about when the Banyan Elementary School opened and
the input she and her family had in the selection of the name, colors, mascot, etc. She did not think
this was advertised very well in the newspaper. She felt it should have been opened Up to let
people vote on the naming of the school.
Steve Figuerea stated good sportsmanship is the lesson to be learned.
Lori Coy, 10328 Refero Court stated they did not feel they had the opportunity to select the name
and that the school district did not give the people the opportunity to vote on this. She felt with all of
the people that volunteer at the schools they have the right to be included in this process. She felt
it should be opened up.'
13. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 13--THE SAFE
DRINKING WATER, CLEAN WATER, WATERSHED PROTECTION AND FLOOD PROTECTION ACT
Staff report presented by Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager.
Councilmember Biane stated he supports this bond, but felt the Cucamonga County Water District should
reconsider the rate hikes and looking at spending the bond monies more prudently. He added he felt they
should look for better ways to find dollars to do the clean-up of lower Chino Basin.
Mayor Alexander stated he agreed, but did support Prop 13.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-037
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 13, THE
SAFE DRINKING WATER, CLEAN WATER, WATERSHED PROTECTION
AND FLOOD PROTECTION ACT
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 00-037.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
City Council Minutes
March 1, 2000
Page 8
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn to executive session as added under Item C
on the agenda by unanimous vote of the Council. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting
adjourned at 9:11 p.m. No action was taken in executive session.
Respectfully submitted,
Approved: *
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
March 15, 2000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council was held on Wednesday, March 15, 2000, in the Council
Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
The meeting was called to order at 7:20 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and
Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman,
City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Mitch Slagerman, Sr. RDA
Analyst; Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Kathy Wahlstrom, RDA Analyst; Flavio Nunez, Assistant RDA
Analyst; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Sid Siphomsay, Info Systems Analyst; Sam
Davis, Info Systems Analyst; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose,
Deputy City Enigma; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Dave
Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Rodney Hoops, Police Department; Duane Baker,
Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; and Debra J. Adams,
City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation to DARE Officers for appreciation.
Captain Hoops introduced the deputies and thanked them for ail of their hard work
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Deputies Almblad, Stewart and Reed.
Captain Hoops also showed a video of the DARE Program.
B2. Presentation of Certificate of Achievement to Jerry La Pointe of Jerry La Pointe Video
Productions. His original production "Our Favorite Place," describing the services and opportunities
for youngsters visiting the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library, received the Platinum "Best of Show"
Award in the 1999 Aurora Awards Film and Video competition.
Mayor Alexander presented the Certificate of Achievement to Jerry La Pointe.
Mr. La Pointe presented the award he had won to the City.
His award winning video was also shown.
Deborah Clark, Library Director, also informed everyone about the Library Telethon which is to take
place on March 24, 25, and 26, and asked for everyone's support.
City Council Minutes
Mamh 15, 2000
Page 2
B3. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing Les Richter of the California Speedway for his
Regional Contributions and Involvement.
Les Richter received the Proclamation from Mayor Alexander and was thanked for his community
contributions and involvement.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. Steven Ball of Steve's Automotive and Towing, read from the Tow Agreement quoting
information about the towing rotation. He talked about the tow companies that are outside of the City
limits or do not have their yard within the City. He felt the City was losing out on a lot of business
because of this.
Mayor Alexander stated he agreed with him and planned on putting this matter on the next agenda
for further discussion.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated item 10 was to be removed from the agenda and would come
back at a later date when it was ready.
George Georgiou pulled item 4 for discussion.
D1. Approval of Minutes:
February 2, 2000
February 7, 2000 (Adjourned Meeting)
February 23, 2000 (Special Meeting)
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/23/00 and 3/1/00 and Payroll ending 2/17/00 for the total
amount of $2,520,563.05.
D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 29, 2000.
D4. Approval of a Resolution establishing findings and determinations regarding an appeal flied by
George Georgiou. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY GEORGE GEORGIOU.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-038
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ITS FINDINGS AND
DETERMINATIONS REGARDING 6549 EGGLESTONE PLACE,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
D5. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records pursuant to California
Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal
citations.
City Council Minutes
March 15, 2000
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 00-039
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF
CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET
FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND
OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES
D6. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR
98-12, located at the northwest terminus of Bell Court, west of Red Oak Street, submitted by Charles
Unsworth.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-040
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DR 98-12
RESOLUTION NO. 00-041
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR DR 98-12
D7. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement Security for interior streets and
storm drains (2nd phase, Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue), and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract
Map No. 15875, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard,
submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc., a California Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-042
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITYCOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER
15875 AND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 00-043
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALKIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION QF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS 1 AND
3 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15875
City Council Minutes
March 15, 2000
Page 4
D8. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the Contract (CO 00-012) in the amount of
$32,450.00 ($29,500.00 plus 10% contingency) for the Modification of Traffic Signals and Intersection
Lighting at Carnelian Street and 19u~ Street (SR 30), to the apparent low bidder, New West Signals, to
be funded from Transportation Fund Account No. 22-4637-9811.
D9. Approval to accept Irrevocable Authority to Pay #LG200012A reducing the Faithful Performance
Bond for Tract 13812, located on the south side of Summit Avenue, west of Etiwanda Avenue,
submitted by Wealth V, LLC and release Irrevocable Authority to Pay #SB995038.
D10. Approval to accept the Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Contract No. 99-089, as
complete, release the bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and
approve the final contract amount of $250,594.07. REMOVED FROM AGENDA
RESOLUTION NO. 00-044
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HAVEN AVENUE
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT AS COMPLETE, RELEASE
THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Dl1. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Reports and Setting of
Public Hearing for May 3, 2000, to Levy the Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2000/2001 for
Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. No increase of assessment rate
is proposed.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-045
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY
ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTICT NO. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF
ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED
RESOLUTION NO. 00-046
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY
AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
2000/2001 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT
OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING
OBJECTIONS THERETO
D12. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Reports and Setting of
Public Hearing for May 3, 2000, to Levy the Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2000/2001 for Street
Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. No increase of assessment rate is
proposed.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-047
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY
ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCRASE OF
ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED
City Council Minutes
March 15, 2000
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 00-048
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY
AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR
HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
D13. Approval of the Resolution approving and confirming the Engineer's Reports and Setting of
Public Hearing for May 3, 2000, to Levy the Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2000/2001 for the
Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). No increase of assessment rate is proposed.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-049
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY
ENG9NEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR PARK AND RECREATION
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT
RATE PROPOSED
RESOLUTION NO. 00-050
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY
AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85), FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972;
AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS
THERETO
MOTION: Moved by Willlares, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports within the Consent Calendar with the exception of items 4 and 10. Motion carried unanimously
5-0.
DISCUSSION OF ITEM t0. Approval to accept the Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project,
Contract No. 99-089, as complete, release the bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice
of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $250,594.07.
Mr. Georgiou stated he did not think the City Council received the best legal advice at the February 23
meeting. He referred to various letters he had written and stated he did not feel he had got a response
to them. He continued to quote from various comments made at the February 23 meeting.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated Bill Curley represented his firm at this hearing and felt the
comments he made at the meeting were correct. He stated the Appeals Board process is still
available to Mr. Georgiou if he chooses.
Mayor Alexander reiterated this comment to Mr. Georgiou as well.
Councilmember Biane pointed out to everyone the procedure they went through for this appeal and
that he did not receive any evidence that the wall was built incorrectly.
Councilmember Willlares stated she agreed.
City Council Minutes
March 15, 2000
Page 6
Councilmember Curatalo stated he agreed with Councilmember Biane and added he heard no
evidence of a violation of any code.
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve Resolution No. 00-038. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
No Items Submitted.
No items Submitted.
No Items Submitted.
ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF LICENSE AND COVENANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES, INC., (CO 00-013)
FOR CITY'S TEMPORARY USE OF GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES, INC. PROPERTY FOR A
TEMPORARY PARKING LOT DURING CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE II, PARKING LOT
EXPANSION AT THE CITY'S METROLINK STATION, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND THE AT&SF.
Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer.
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve CO 00-013. Motion carried unanimously
5-0.
H2. APPROVAL TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT (CO00-
014) IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,740,172.26 ($7,036,520.25 PLUS 10%) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD MEDIANS PHASE II FROM 600 FEET WEST OF HERMOSA
AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE, DEER CREEK CHANNEL BRIDGE WIDENING,
FOOTHILL/HERMOSA STORM DRAIN AND HERMOSA AVENUE STREET WIDENING PROJECT
TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, KEC ENGINEERING, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NOS.
32-4637-9824, 22-4637-8833, 22-4637-9920, 12-4637-9610 AND 74-4225-7044 (RE: ALSO
FUNDED BY RDA ACCOUNT NO. 15-51000 AND APPROPRIATIONS FROM ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT RESERVES).
Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer.
City Council Minutes
March 15, 2000
Page ?
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, public comments
were closed.
Councilmember Dutton inquired if this would help the flooding situation south of Foothill.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated it would.
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve CO 00-014. Motion carried unanimously
5-0.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
ACTION: Report received and filed.
12. UPDATE OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR NEW LOS OSOS HIGH SCHOOL (Oral
Presentation)
Brad Buller, City Planner, introduced Larry Wolf, architect for the project to give the presentation.
Mr. Wolf gave a power point presentation showing various aspects of the school which was to be
located on the northeast corner of Banyan and Milliken. He continued to talk about the facilities
located within the campus. He talked about the 850 parking spaces that would be located on the
campus.
Councilmember Dutton stated he appreciated Chaffey Joint Union High School District giving the
City the opportunity to be involved in the planning process. He told Mr. Wolf he felt he had done an
excellent job.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
J1. Mayor Alexander and Councilmember Williams both stated they would like the towing agreement
issue previously brought up on the next meeting agenda.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
K1. Steve Rentoda stated residents are still concerned about the traffic situation near Kenyon and
Fairmont because of the freeway construction. He felt significant progress has been made. He
stated they would still like to see Kenyon and Fairmont between Kenyon and Highland closed.
City Council Minutes
March 15, 2000
Page 8
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss labor
negotiations per Government Code Section 54957.6 to give George Rivera, Administrative Services
Manager, Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, and Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director,
direction in regards to the meet and confer process. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting
adjourned at 8:51 p.m. No action was taken in executive session.
Respectfully submitted,
Approved: *
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
CItY OF RANCHO CUCAMJNbA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FCR PERIOD: 03-08-00 C99/00)
RUN DATE: 03108/00 PAGE: t
5A73 N[GMTLENE SECURITY PATROL
2113~ CARONELLe CARREN 0o
21750 CHZANTZ RESTAURANT[ [TALIANO
[gZ5 MCGAREC FACHENE
3ZZIZ LAW JFFICE OF GREGORT P. JOhNS
3~63 BOPKC. CH~ZSTOPffER
12050 SPA HOTEL L CASENO
ZIdTZ CAPE-ZOO0 CONFERENCE
6564 BEARD, TED
4635 A ~ ~ PHOTOGRAPHY
lO A C R TIRE SERVICE
6)07 AAA PORTABLE RESTROOM CO,
Z73Z ASC LOCKSMITHS
7 AALETRONIC5
6509 ACCOUNTANTS OVERLOAD
e30T CC~NCEPT
SECURITY SERVICE
R~IMSURSE FINGERPRENT FE~
5USZNESS LICENSE REFUND
HAiNTENANCE SUPPLIES
HOTEL RESERVATIONS
MOIEL RESERVATIONS
REGISTRATION
RECREATION REFUND
PHQT0 CEVELQPING & SUPPLIES
V~hICL~ MAINTENANCE
RECREATION REFUNO
HAZNTr-NANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
DEPOSIT REFUNG
INSPECTION SERVICES
PRCFESSIONAL SERVICES
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION
RUN DATE: 03/08/00 PAGE: Z
VENDOR NAME ~TEM DESCRZPTEON ~ARR NO WARR, AMT
~833 50OK5 ON TAPE, ZNC,
2187~ BOR[Re JANE5
5993 ~ROCKe ALLEN
85 CUC~MONGA CQ WATER OZST
Z~78 DAPPER TE~E
5121 DE VOOGHTw SCOTT Jo
5138 DIAMOND FENCE CO,
839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK
~tZ7 FASTENAL CONPANT
~56 FEDERAL JOB5 OLDEST
666 FILAMENT PRO AUDIO
155 FZLARSKT C WATT
L37 GTE CALIFORNIA
6~77 GUZMANe LESLIE
3Z261 HACIENDA POOLS
5699 HARALA~EO5 BEVERAGE COMPANY
~ CHECKA OVERLAP
CiTy dF ~NCHU CUCAM~NbA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FER PE~IUO: 03-08-00 (99/00)
RUN DATE: 03108/00 PAGE: 3
VENDOR NAME ETCH DESCRIPTION NARR NO WARP, AMT,
3276
612
6090
6336
6327
Z D BURR
ZCI OULUX PAINT CENTERS
INLANG TCP SOIL MIXES
JACOBSEN DIVISION CF TEXTRON~. INCo
ZZ4d NAPA AUTa PARTS
3229~ NATURAL PATh FORESTRY
5~73 NIGHTLINE SECURITY PATROL
32300 NOETM, DIAhNa
MAINTEAANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MAINT SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAENTENANCE
UUSINESS L£CENSE ~EFUND
~UESCRIPTIONS
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
FILM PROCESSING
RECREATION SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLEE
VEhiCLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
R~MAB. PROGRAM
C.EoRoT INSTRUCTOR
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION
RECREATION SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES.
SECURITY SEPVICE
LIBRARY SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION
VEHICLE MAINTaNANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE
C0~TRACT SERVICES
A
<(( 1~,9523 -
m
RUN DATE: 03108/00 PAGE: 4
VENDOR NAME ITEM ~SCRIPTION WARR ND WARRe AMT,
3126 PRECISIDk CATA PROEUCTS
ZS33 PRENTICE HALL
65 PRUDENTIAL DVERALL SUPPLY
Z176 QUADRANT SYSTEMSg INC.
1432 SDUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
3058 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
7256 STJFA, JOSEPI"
TOOLS-R-US
TRUGREEN - LANDCARE REGIONAL
1
I
|
|
~UN 0ATE: 03/08/00 PAGE: 5
VENDOR NAME ITEM OESCRiPTZON WARR NO WA~R. AMTo
295a UNPS nRd US ASSOCIATION UMP SE~VICEj m 1~9601 1m780o00
~l~ T~JTAL S07mDaZ,29
CITY OF RANCHD CUCAHQNGA
LIST OF NARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 03-15-00 (99/003
RUN DATE: 03/15/00 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEH DESCRZPTEON NARR NO WARRo ANT,
667 ARRORHEAD CREDIT UNION
339 LANe JACK
581 SAN BERN COUNT7
6545 CAFE JUSTICE
I AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS C0.9 ZNCo
2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS
7 ABLETRONICS
3785 ACTION ART
21889 ADVANCED ALARM, XNC.
21888 AER CONTROL SPECIALTIES, INC.
1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
1430 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS
21890 AMERICAN FISH ~ SEAFOOD COMPANY
21887 AMERICAN SPZRIT PRINTING
2906 AMERICAN TNERMOPLASTZC COMPANY
21886 ANERZPRZDE UNZFQRM SERVICES
4417 APG CONPANt
2341 ARCHIBALD FLOWERS
4155 ARCHIBALD FLOWERS
5807 ARCHZTERRA DESIGN GROUP
1291 ARCUS DATA SECURXTV
6530 ARKOZANe RAZMZK
21891 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE DF UPLAND
1437 ASSOCIATED GROUP
4102 8 & K ELECTR/C MHOLESALE
21895 BAKER COMMODITZES9 ZNC,
21693 BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, ZNCo
6142 EASSETT-SNITHe TERR[
4441 BEST BUT CO., 1NCo
6527 BEYOND,CON
6355 BE-TECH SOFTNAREe ZNC,
5866 BODY CONCEPT
4699 BORONERe MARGEE
21896 BOUMAN CONSTRUCTION
5525 BOWERVe ROBERT
4369 BRODART 80DK8
5341 BUCKNAN ~ ASSOCZATES
5131 CAL[Fo NUNICZPAL TREASURERS ASSOC.
6Z CALIFORNIA JOURNAL
1223 CALSENSE
68 CENTRAL CZTZES SIGN SERVICE
1061 CHAMPXDN AWARDS & SPECIALITZES
6052 CHARTER COPMUNZCATZONS
6052 CHARTER CDNNUNZCATIONS
VXSA MONTHLY BZLLZNGS
00 CHECKI OVERLAP
I 1680860 Zs779.65
((( 168087 - 148759
RECREATION REFUND 1687600 .44.00-
((< 168761 - 149080
LEAGUE MEETING 1490810 75°00-
((( 16908Z - 149617
CAL-ZD PROGRAM 1496180 123o00
REFUND PARKING CZTATEON 149619~ 1e287.61
(<( 169620 - 149621
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES t 149622 526.62
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 149623 185o71
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 169624 303,51
RECREATION SUPPLIES ! 169625 781,04
BUSINESS LXCENSE REFUND 149626 44°60
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 149627 13,86
((( 149628 - 149628
CELLULAR PHONE BXLLXNGS I 149629 2s347o95
OFFICE SUPPLIES 149630 20958.38
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 149631 lO2.OO
BUSINESS LXCENSE REFUND 149632 21.77
OFFICE SUPPLIES 149633 109.86
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 149634 33°75
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 149635 29160.00
FLOWERS 149636 138o48
VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION PROGRAH 149637 ~1o86
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I 149638 3s264.00
DATA STORAGE 149639 349.50
CONTRACT SERVICE 149640 112.00
8USXNESS LXCENSE REFUND 149641 30°53
MOhTHLY HAXNTENANCE SERVICE i 149662 10615.00
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 8 169643 4f272o39
BUSXNESS LICENSE REFUND 149644 11.52
CANDIDATE TESTING 149645 65,00
RECREATION REFUND 149666 A2,25
OFFICE SUPPLIES 1496~I 228.41
RECREATION REFUNDS 149648 12e465.13
REIMBURSE FOR EAP WORKSHOP 149649 4,692.00
TREADMILLS 169650 5e305.30
INSTRUCTOR PNT 149651 ZOODO0
OUSXNESS LICENSE REFUND 149652 8o10
REFUND-BUSINESS RELATED EXP, I 149653 154.47
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF MARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 03-15-00 (99100)
RUN DATE= 03115100 PAGE= Z
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARRo ANTe
713 CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS INC
914 CLAREWONT CAMERA ~ VIDEO, INC.
85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
6549 CUCAMONGA WHEELS
6694 CUTTING EDGE VIDEO CONCEPTS
6695 D & J FOOTHILL ELECTRICAL
2512 D A R E AMBRICA
ZATB DAPPER TIRE
60 OELTA DENTAL
4366 DEMCOm INC,
5744 DIRECTV
5788 DUFFYI RICK/OSKO
41194 DORANS TONING
977 E S R Ie INCe
3364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS
5137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE
2349 ESGIL CORP,
41171 ESTESm SHERRY
3806 ETINANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
41195 FELDNANNm KEN
2909 FILTER RECTCLING SERVICE, ZNCe
6371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC
16982 FRASURE, MICRAEL
6232 GADABOUT TOURSt INC
6070 GALE GROUPm THE
352 GENE'S ALL COLOR PAINT
SSOZ GIOROANOm MARIANNA
1245 GONSALVES ~ SONm JOE
137 GTE CALIFORNIA
137 GTE CALIFORNIA
6277 GUZMANm LESLIE
6236 H R S USA
4525 HAAKER EQUIPMENT
2855 HAVEN WINE & LIQUOR COe
6552 HENRYm ANNE
3231A HILL°S PET NUTRITION SALESe ZNC,
2255 HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC
32301 HOSTESS THRIFT STORE
495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTSe INC
4188 I 0 BURR
4878 I E M A
4254 IBM CORPORATION
5682 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP
CHECKS OVERLAP
RECREATION SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES/SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
COHPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
MAINTBNANCE SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MONTHLY WATER OZLLINGS
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUNO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DeA,R,Ee MATERIAL
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
DENTAL INSURANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUBSCRIPTION
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
REFUND
SOFTWARE SUPPORT FEES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
RECREATION REFUND
FACILITY RENTAL
REFUND
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
149672
149699
149666
169665
149666
169667
149668
149669
149670
149671
149672
169673
202°03
221.Z9
432.99
323025
655°00
3m635,00
lm334.96
CITY OF RANCHO CDCANONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 03-15-00 (99100)
RUN DATE: 03/15100 PAGE: 3
VENDOR NAME ITEN DESCRIPTION HARR NO WARR. ANT,
~ CHECK~ OVERLAP
523
5603
4806
12088
908 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD LANDLORD/TENANT DISPUTE RESOLD 169792 10o00
3692 INTRAVAIA ROCK & SAND MAINTEhANCE SUPPLIES 169793 85.00
5147 IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION SAFETY TRAINING 149794 40.00
32312 JARVIS, TERRY REIMBURSENENT 149795 30°00
6686 JCH INTERNATIONAL RECREATION REFUND 149796 69Zo10
175 JOBS AVAILABLE ADVERTISEMENTS 149797 Z8o00
6147 KAMZN 6 ASSOCIATES, INC, MAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES I I49798 738,66
6139 KAUFNAN AND EROAD REIMB. PEST CNTRL REGISTRATION A 149799 4,495o30
6193 NLANATH BAT RECREATION REFUND 149800 IZ4o59
5295 KLAUS ~ SONS MISC 149801 747.00
6090 KONGf SOPHAK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 149802 480.00
4982 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION C.D.O.G. 149803 3,969.00
6516 KRUSEe JOAN A. RECREATION REFUNOS 149804 1,300o00
5545 L S A ASSOCIATESe INCo PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ~ 149805 SeZTOoZ6
339 LAW, JACK LEAGUE MEETING ~ 14980b 236.69
321 LANDSCAPE WESTf ZNC, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE e 149807 10Tw369o96
32302 LAN OFFICE OF VINCENT Bo GARCZA BUSINESS LICENSE 149808 66°00
32310 LDC COUGARm LLC REFUND OVERPAYMENT 149809 1olz
315 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES INLAND EMPIRE DIV. MEETING # 149810 189o00
S886 LZLBURN CORPORATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES A 149811 4,9Z0.00
5662 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA 8TLo CO. RECREATION SUPPLIES 149812 237°68
4941 LUCKETT ROOFING CO, MAINTENANCE 149813 2,400o00
1062 N C I WORLDCON TELEPHONE SERVICES # 149816 989oZ9
4000 N S A NENBERSHZP 149815 180.00
32315 N S ROUSE CEMPANY BUSINESS KICENSE 149816 Z7.00
32303 NAGNON ENGINEERING BUSINESS LICENSE 149817 25°32
6553 MAGRUDER, KAREN REGISTRATION FEE I49818 145o80
72 MARK CHRISe INCo VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 169819 79°08
5300 NAYERe COBLE & PALM~R PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149820 lwZSOoO0
5148 NCCLINTON TRUCKING CO.eINCe JeC° MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 169821 Ze133.69
Z995 MCNURRAY & STERN SUPPLIES/SERVICE I 149822 62.67
2198 MICHAELS STORES INC° 43019 RECREATION SUPPLIES 169823 6.46
4374 MOBILE STORAGE GROUPe INC. EQUIPMENT RENTAL 149824 140.13
32306 MOOREFIELD CONSTRUCTION INC. BUSINESS LICENSE 149825 2,61Z.50
1171 MOTOROLA CaMRUNo ~ ELECom ZNC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 169826 lw077.82
4236 MOULDZNGS O NILLNORK FORMICA COMPUTER WORK STATION 149827 le079°86
3316 MR T'S ZB-HR° TOWING TONING 149828 90.00
32313 NAJJAR, MOMANAD REFUND DISNISSED CITATION 149829 107.00
32305 NALLYt JOHN J. 0 JULZE BUSINESS LICENSE 149830 3Z.98
2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 149831 420.65
764 NATIONAL DEFERRED DEFERRED CaMP 149832 2,169.00
4216 NEW HORIZONS CLOt INCo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 149933 le685.00
5316 NRPA MEMBERSHIP DUES 169834 70.00
(C< 149835 - 149837
OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES I 169838 6e509.97
OFFICE MAX OFFICE SUPPLIES 'e 149839 173.54
DTTs LAURA INSTRUCTOR SNR.EXERCISE CLASS I 169840
P. SoNe, INColJACK WATTANAPORN PROFESSIONAL FEES REZNB 149861 3,717.02
PACIFIC BELL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 169842 2e476.11
PACIFIC WESTERN SECURITY SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE 1~98~3 7,00
PANNON DESIGN & DEVELOPMENTe INC. REIM8. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 149846 114.9Z0.28
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 03-15-00 (99/00)
RUN DATE: 031%5/00 PAGE:
VENOOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARN. ANT.
** CNECKA OVERLAP
32307 PEREZ ELECTRIC BUSINESS LICENSE %49845 90o00
32308 PERRY OESIGNS BUSZNESS LICENSE ~49846 60°00
7211 PZTTENGERm CHRZSTINA REFUND PEgS DEDUCT%ON 149967 5.88
693 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY COol INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 149868 74S,54
758 PRAXAZR DZSTRIBUTION~ ZNCo MAZNTIRECREATION SUPPLIES 149849 27.61
3286 PRINCIPAL LiFE MEDICAL/DISABILITY INSURANCE %49850 75,87Z.98
3Z30b PRODUCTION ENGINEERING & MACHINE BUSINESS LICENSE 149851 10o00
32309 PROFIT RESOURCES BUSINESS LICENSE %49852
323%6 PRUITT CONSTRUCTZONw XNCo RoL BUSINESS L~CENSE X49853 63.00
28% R & R AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE MAZNT,.SUPPL~ES&S'ERVZCE %49854 Z98o91
I890 R ~ R LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERViCE/SUPPLiES %49855 802.66
3663 R & T SPECIALTYe INCo OoA. RoEo SUPPLIES 149856 1s632o84
4AS% R C QUAKES PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL TGIF MINI PLAN 149857 600.00
345 R D 0 EQUIPMENT CO MAINT SUPPLIES %69850 2.09
%%824 RAILS-TO-TRAILS CONSERVANCY SUBSCRIPTION 149859 %8.50
26~ RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES 149860 94°73
960 RAMIREZe SANORA G. COMOEX MEETING %4986% 150o00
70 RANCNO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER MEMBERSHIP MEETING 149862 20o00
2600 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT SALARY AND BENEFITS %49863 46.37
%Z074 REDLINE PRECISION MACHINING&FAD BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 14986~ 39°60
5914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLXES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES i 149865
276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS i 149866 609°55
626 ROBLESw RAUL P-w SR. TIRE REPAIR # 149867 23Zo50
5072 RT LANRENCE CORPORATION COMPUTER CONSULTANTS I49868 5,387.50
4704 RUSHe CNRIS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT %49869
1292 S ~ S ARTS AND CRAFTS RECREATION SUPPLIES 149870 124.11
5538 SAN ANTONIO RATERIALS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1A9872 227°70
581 SAN BERN COUNTY CAL-ID PROGRAN 149871 39.00
581 SAN BERN COUNTY CAL-ID PROGRAM 149873 78°00
5338 SAN 8ERNAREINOe CITY OF TELETHCN SUPPORT # 149874 3,600°00
12075 SATSUMA SUSHI BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 149875 Z2.SO
1105 SEAL FURNITURE E SYSTEMS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 149876 lt331o78
5634 SENN, CINDY ~NSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 149877 244.80
1829 SHARED TECHo FAIRCHILD TELECOM~ INC TELEPHONE SERVICES R 149878 1,956.02
1Z076 SHARP-RIlE TODLe INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 149879 14o99
12077 SMETHeN. D.e LEENA OUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 149880 70.00
1Z078 SHOP-N-GO BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 149881 8.15
351 SiGN SHOP, THE HAINT SUPPLIES 149881 1A9.46
692 SIR SPEEDY OFFICE SUPPLIES 169883 64.65
1327 SMART E FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES I 1A9884 291.33
6086 SMART NONEY SUBSCRIPTION 149885 Z2,97
319 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY MONTHLY GAS BILLS I 149886 1,895.55
135 SO CALIF M~NICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDeZNC REGISTRATION %49887 25o00
12091 SOLANO PRESS BOOKS SUBSCRIPTION %~9888 144o23
12079 SOUPLANTATION BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 149889 72.45
((( 149890 - 149893 >>)
1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS ~ 14989~ 7.356o14
SPECTRA COMPANY LABOR AND SUPPLIES 149895
SPEEDWAY MUFFLER INC. VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES/SERVICE 1A9896 372°09
SPH PRODUCTS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 149897
STERZCYCLEm iNCo SHARPS PROGRAM I 149898 243,49
5722
682
12080
CZTY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
LZST OF MARRANTS
FDR PEREOD: 03-15-00 (99100)
RUN DATE: 03/15100 PAGE: 5
VENDOR NANE ITEN DESCRIPTION NARR NO WARR. ANT,
4733
12081
11839
3A95
12082
12083
6554
12084
2737
12085
5601
12086
1226
881
12087
2868
213
267
6688
12089
SUNRISE FORD
SUZANNtS FLONERS
ToVo DOCTOR, THE
TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION, INCo
TELE TRENDS
TONN&COUNTRT CLEANERS
TURCN & ASSOCIATES, DAVID
TURRET PUNCH CO
U C REGENTS
UoS- FOOD SERV;CE
UNI~UE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, ENC.
UNITED INSTALLATIONS
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
VANCE CORPORATION
VENO-U CO
NALL STREET JOURNAL
NAXZEe KLEEN-LZNE CORP
WESTERN ROCK CO
WELLIANSm 8ELLZE JEAN
~ CHECK# 0VERLAP
AUTO SERVICE ~ SUPPLIES R 149899 352.10
OUSZNESS LICENSE REFUNDS 149900 46,00
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 149901 7.50
BIC PACKET OVERPAYMENT 149902 188,073.65
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 149903 228.95
RECREATION REFUND 149906 8.33
CTEORG PAYROLL TRAINING 169905 2OwOOO.08
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 149906 8.50
POCKET GUIDE 149907 144.00
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS* 149908 214.53
NANAGENENT SERVICES I 149909 610.98
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 149910 5.00
UPS SERVICE I 149911 63o91
BASELINE ROAD IZDENZNG t 149912 T,019.96
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 149913 40.92
SUBSCRIPTION 149916 95.90
RAINY SUPPLIES # 169915 769.40
ASPHALT & CONCRETE I 149916 515o00
RECREATION REFUND 169917 300.00
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 149918 48.35
RECREATION REFUND # 169919 400,00
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 149920 5,9Z6.25
COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE 149921 616o68
ROCHESTER/LARK DR RIGHT-OF-NAY 149922 AO0.O0
RECREATION REFUND 149923 26.00
TOTAL 848t660o02
RUN DATE: 03/22/00 PAGE: 1
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
11938 ULTRA SEAL
1205B SMART DIGITAL TECHNOLOOY
5228 CROSSROADS SERVICES
581 SAN BERN COUNTY
12055 SMART DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY
21897 7UP BOTTLINO COMPANY
4635 A & K PHOTOGRAPHY
6451 A A AUTOMOTIVE
6507 AAA PORTABLE RESTROOM CO.
2732
4347
5792
1826
3778
ABC LOCKSMITHS
ABILITY SEWER, INC.
ACCURATE SMO0, AUTO, TRUCK &
ADAM, ROBERT
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
AEI MUSIC NETWORK, INC.
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
ALLEN, TONY
ALPERT, MELANIE
ALTA FIRE EGUIPMENT CO.
AMERICAN CONTRACTORS~ INC.
AMERICAN JETTING SERVICES 5CA
AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES
ARBOR NURSERY INC.
667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
5069 ASSOC. ARTISTS OF THE INLAND EMPIRE
383 AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC
1135 AUTO SPECIALISTS
4102 B & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
57~1 8ELETTO~ NANCY
5119 BENSON~ MAURY
2820 BERNELL HYDRAULICS~ INC.
8087 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR
4441 BEST BUY CO., INC.
21900 BEST TEMPORARY SERVICES
4407 BETTER ENERGY IDEAS
6355 8I-TECH SOFTWARE, INC.
4833 BOOKS ON TAPE, INC.
21901 C & D BUSINESS SYSTEM
4949 C L 0 U T
BUSINESS~LICENSE REFUNDS
TRAINING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
<ZC'(
CAL-fD PROGRAM
TRAINING
BUSINESS LICENSE REPUND
PHOTO DEVELORINO ~ SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
DEPOSIT REFUND
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
ALARM SERVICE
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
CELLULAR PHONE BILLINOS
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
SERVICE/SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
MONTHLY SERVICE
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS
RECREATION SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
REIMBURSE FOR EAP WORKSHOP
LIBRARY SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PMT
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
INSTRUCTOR PMT
RECREATION REFUND
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
REGISTRATION
149367 198.00-
RUN DATE: 03/22/00 PAGEZ 2
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT,
4412 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY
4735 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY
1223 CALSENSE
4538 CARPENTER'S WOOD SHOP
3001 CENTEX HOMES
68 CENTRAL CITIES SIBN SERVICE
73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO~ INC.
74 CITY RENTALS
949 CLAR~, KAREN
81810 CLARK~ MARILYN
21902 CLUB MATRIXX
6548 COASTLINE COVER COMPANY
21903 COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL
2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY
5407 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE
643 COMPUTERLAND
85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
21905 CUCINA HOLDINGS, INC.
239 D & K CONCRETE CO
4488 DAQHDEVIRIAN, KATHY
4084 DAMES & MOORE
6302 DEAN, INC.~ STUART
105 DERSISH GUERRA & ASSOC.
107 DETCO
5138 DIAMOND FENCE CO.
977 E S R I, INC.
41196 EAZY TOWING
41083 ENTERPRISE CAR SALES
41197 ENTERTAINMENT PUBLICATIONS, INC.
4436 EPIXTECH, INC.
5917 FASTENAL COMPANY
8103 FAUST PRINTING
123 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
4762 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER
98 FORD PRINTING & MAILING, INC
41398 FORECAST GROUP L,P.~THE
41199 FOREMOST PACKAGING
41200 FOREMOST THREADED PRODUCTS, INC
6232 GADABOUT TOURS, INC
6070 GALE GROUP, THE
3356 GARCIA, VIVIAN
8834 GEIGER BROTHERS WEST
5643 DEC PLASTICS~ INC,
41201 GINTH~ ROSEMARY
5502 GIORDANO~ MARIANNA
32338 80NZALEZ, LUPE
4864 GRDLIER PUBLISHING COMPANY
5387 GST TELECOM, INC.
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/SERVICE
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
OFFICE/MAINTENANCE EGUIPMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
OVERPAYMENT REFUND
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
EGUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
RECREATION REFUND
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
SERVICE/REPAIRS
TRAFFIC DESIGN PACKAGE
MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
STREET MAINTENANCE
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACT SERVICES
CONTRACT SERVICES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES/SERVICE
SOFTWARE SUPPORT FEES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
DEPOSIT REFUND
BUSINESS LICENSE 8EFUND
SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
DELIVERY SERVICE
FAMILY SHELTER
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
RECREATION
LIBRARY SOCKS
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
RECREATION
LIBRARY SUPPLIES
INTERNET SERVICES
*~ CHECK~ OVERLAP
149976 254,13
149977 140,94
149978 1,901.50
# 149979 1,475,00
149980 450.00
149981 845.95
# 149980 1,795.09
149983 105.30
149984 264.00
149985 70.00
149986 15.01
149987 603.40
149988 79,70
149989 152.46
149998 1,135.80
~ 149991 1,534.36
# 14999B 513,74
149993 10~969.43
149994 - 149996
# 149997 9~229.32
149998 100.00
~ 149999 2,219.12
1500O0 437.40
150001 34.50
150002 3,000.00
# 150003 47~061.50
150004 3992
150005 18500
~ 150006 5,044.56
150007 13. 50
150008 2,50000
150009 261.86
150010 75.37
# 150011 8,863.32
150012 1,316,17
# 150013 75.26
150014 250.00
150015 803.29
150016 1125
150017 46.00
150018 17.07
150019 781.20
150020 160.15
150021 2210
# 150022 276,98
# 150023 3,352.68
150024 36.00
150025 10800
150026 200.00
# 150027 1,162.49
150028 1,060.00
150029 - 150029
l
t
I
i
4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 03-22-00
RUN DATE: 03/22/00 PAGE: 3
VENDOR NAME ITEM DE8CRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
~ CHECK# OVERLAP
137 GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS # 150030 3,092.00
6277 GUZMAN, LESLIE CONTRACT SERVICE 150031 147.50
6383 H.V. CARTER CO. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND ~ 150032 17687
32326 HAGEY, VERONICA RECREATION 150033 35.00
6127 HANGER 18 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 150034 128.00
3334 HEILIG, KELLY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 150035 921+24
4724 HI-WAY SAFETY~ INC+ MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 150036 84.05
616 HIGHSMITH CO, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 150037 37.8~
158 HOLLIDAY ROC~ CO.~ INC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 150038 734.2~
<<< 15003e - 150040 >>>
4033 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 150041 2,934.23
1234 HOSEMAN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 150042 2623
3634 HOUSE OF RUTH 93/94 CDBG CONTRACT 150043 633.00
161 HDYT LUMBER CO+, S.M. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 150044 303.92
~412 HOYT, RAYMOND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 150045 904.80
4e5 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 150046 1~096.16
2927 I C B 0 MEMBERSHIP FEES 150047 73.27
4188 I D BURR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 150048 74.74
3736 INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN. MEN'S SOCCER PROGRAM # 150049 2,656.50
908 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD LANDLORD/TENANT DISPUTE RESOL. # 150050 1,895.23
122 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN ADVERTISING # 150051 5,454.03
6202 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 150052 236.00
2315 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 150053 24.36
3452 INTRAVAIA ROC~ & SAND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 150054 60.00
32144 JOHNSON, NYDETT RECREATION 150055 56.00
655e JONES, JAMES REFUND BUILDING PERMITS 150056 36000
32324 JUAREGUEI, MARIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 150057 150.00
179 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN MEDICAL INSURANCE 150058 29,212.60
4822 KARATSU, ROBERT REIMBURSEMENT 150059 84.00
6139 KAUFMAN AND BROAD BEIMB. PEST CNTRL REGISTRATION # 150060 2,572.50
32320 KELLY EQUIPMENT BUSINESS LICENSE 150061 46.00
32321 KINKO'S INO. BUSINESS LICENSE 150062 68.74
6482 KISH~ MARY L. RECREATION REFUND' 150063 73.95
32325 KNECHT, JOAN REFUND OVERPAYMENT ON PERMITS 150064 16263
32332 KOHLER, LaDONNA RECREATION 150065 3100
6090 KQNG, SOPHAK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 150066 480.00
172 KOZLOVICH, DEBBIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 150067 2,061.15
6516 ~RUSE, JOAN A. RECREATIO~ REFUNDS 150068 1,160.00
339 LAM, JACK LEAGUE MEETING 150069 30.12
5216 LAS ROSAS - EMMA SORCINI INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 150070 16050
5134 LEWIS & LEWIS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 150071 322+01
5865 LEWIS PARTNERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150072 800.00
32335 LONG, MARY RECREATION 150073 31.00
600 LYNCH, JANIE RECREATION SUPPLIES # 150074 50.70
32329 MALADY, JEANETTE RECREATION 150075 3~.50
2369 MAR-CO EQUIPMENT CO. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE 150076 57.31
4727 MARSHALL PLUMBING REHAB. PROGRAM # 150077 233.00
4701 MARSHALL, SYLVIA RECREATION REFUND 150078 717.60
4458 MCGRAW-HILL, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 150079 50.15
32333 MEDINA~ CHARISSE RECREATION 150080 40.00
32319 MELCAL ASSOCIATES LTD. PARTNERSHIP BUSINESS LICENSE 150081 166.~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIODz 03-22-00 (99/00)
RUN DATE: 03/22/00 PAGE: 4
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT,
32318 MICKEY~ dIM JR,
749 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY
32387 MINOR~ ~ATHLEEN
32331 MONTGOMERY, RICHARD
3~337 MONTIEL, CELMA
383~8 MOORE, MICHAEL
32330 MOSKOS, BDNNIE
32334 MOUNTAIN VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH
555~ MT HIGH ENTERTAINMENT
8248 NAPA AUTO PARTS
5920 NATURE TE~H LANDSCAPE
2361 N~WPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES
523 OFFICE DEPOT
527 OLYMPIC STUDIOS
3964 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER
5461 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE
6560 ORTIZ, SUMMER
1441 PACIFIC BELL
~287 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA
44~9 PARK SPECIALTIES
5318 EARKER, SHANNON
5409 PARTSMASTER, INC.
487 PATTON SALES CORP,
6148 PIRON~ SHAUN
27~ PITNEY BOWES
6206 PLANNIN~ CENTER, THE
255 PSMA DISTRIBUTING CO
3~58 POMONA INL VALLEY CNCL OF CHURCHES
4401 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC.
5316 PRECISION GYMNASTICS
32322 PSYCHIC PREDICTIONS
4440 PUTMAN, BILL
6561 PYRO SPECTACULARS~ INC.
32323 PYRO SPECTACULARS, INC.
~890 R & R LIGHTING
2980 R & S FLOOR COVERING
4451 R C GUAKES PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL
1038 R J M DESIGN ~ROUP, INC.
4025 R J SUPPLY CO
418 R M A GROUP
12105 RAMSDELL, STEPHANIE
12109 RANCHO BEAUTY & SUPPLY
5174 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA
5~65 REGULATION COMPLIANCE, INC.
5914 REXEL CALOON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
1~106 REYES, YOLANDA
RELEASE OF DEPOSIT
ALARM SERVICES
RECREATION
RECREATION
RECREATION
RECREATION
RECREATION
RECRESTIDN
RECREATION
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
SPRUCE PARK
MAINTENANCE
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
CORE SERVICES CHARGES
158082 500.00
150083 65.00
150084 58.50
150085 39. 50
150086 200.00
150088 45.00
150089 40.00
# 1500~0 6,250.00
150093 550,00
~ 150095 57.04
1500~6 57,24
150097 - 150097
RUN DATE: 03/22/00 PA~E: 5
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
5618 RICHARDS, WATSON. & OERSHON
276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT
626 ROBLES, SAUL P.~ SR.
16 ROTARY CORPORATION
12092 ROYAL STAIR AND DESIGN, INC.
5072 RT LAWRENCE CORPORATION
12093 RUDOLPH, LESLIE
454 S C C C A
581 SAN BERN COUNTY
214 SAN BERN COUNTY SOLID WASTE M~MT
132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO, INC
1105 SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS INC.
2185 SETON IDENTIFICATION PRODUCTS
11773 SHILLINO~ LAURA
351 SION SHOP, THE
4513 SIMON & SCHUSTER
317 SO CALIF EDISON CO.
319 SO CALIF QAS COMPANY
1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
6315 SOUTHWEST AERIAL & CRANE INSPECTORS
3656 SPIRES RESTAURANT~ INC
12094 STARBUCKS COFFEE #5234
12095 STARWAY PRODUCTIONS
2847 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL MOMT.. INC.
12096 STEED, CHRISTINA
3632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION
3632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION
4733 SUNRISE FORD
12097 SWEETS~ MARA
6551 TECH 2000
12099 TELLEZ, IRIS
2718 TERRY~ DONNA
3371 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC.
12107 THOUSAND OAKS, CITY OF
12100 TICHYJ SHARON
6230 TITAN INDUSTRIAL FOOTWEAR CORP.
3333 TODD~ SYLVIA
12110 TOMRA PACIFIC/REYNOLDS
6244 TOOLS-R-US
3388 TRUOREEN - LANDCARE REOIONAL
12098 TV CHRIS
4558 U S OUARDS CO., INC.
12101 UCLA EXTENSION
2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION
12111 UNIFIED OFFICE SUPPLIES
3437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
4606 UPLAND TENNIS CLUB
1~112 UTICA ESCROW CORP
** CHECK# OVERLAP
LEQAL SERVICES # 150133 11,966.00
PRINTS # 150134 4,054.13
TIRE REPAIR 150135 127.50
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 150136 44.08
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 150137 38.00
COMPUTER CONSULTANTS 150138 1,327.12
RECREATION REFUND 150139 48.00
MEETIN~ # 150140 90.00
CAL-ID PROGRAM 150141 143.00
MONTHLY SERVICE 150142 5~25987
MAINT SUPPLIES 150143 249.98
OFFICE SUPPLIES 150144 83.25
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 150145 21.71
RECREATION REFUNDS 150146 30.00
MAINT SUPPLIES ~ 150147 68; 53
LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 150148 29105
<<< 150149 - 150149
MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINQS # 150150 89~553.86
MONTHLY ~AS BILLS # 150151 2,965.56
MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS # 150162 8~518.93
RECREATION REFUND 150163 8495
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 150164 186.11
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 150165 28.00
ENTERTAINMENT 150166 7~35000
SERVICE AND SUPPLIES 150167 29~099.48
RECREATION REFUNDS 150168 26.57
OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 150169 757.87
OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 150170 708.33
AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES 150171 32.26
FINGERPRINTING APPS 150172 13.00
RECREATION REFUND 150173 29852
RECREATION REFUND' 150174 4800
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 150175 287.10
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 150176 30.50
GONSALVES ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE # 150177 502.47
RECREATION REFUND 150178 35.00
RECREATION REFUND # 150179 413.82
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 150180 110.25
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 150181 257.60
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND # 150182 15336
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150183 75000
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 150184 6.48
SECURITY QUARD SERVICE # 150185 3~115.91
REQISTRATION FEES # 150186 470.00
UMP SEBVICES # 150187 2~982.00
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 150188 80.00
UNIFORM SERVICE8 # 150189 2,45831
UPS SERVICE # 150190 31.42
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 150191 546.60
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 150192 30.19
t
!
!
!
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 03-22-00 (99/00)
RUN DATE: 03/22/00 PA~E: ~
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARP NO WARP. ANT,
~ CHECK# OVERLAP
12102 VALENCIA~ JOANN RECREATION REFUNDS 150193 42.50
6398 VENTURA~ LOUIS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 150194 336,00
528~ VIKING TIRE VEHICLE SUPPLIES # 150195 1,924,27
5870 VLSYSTEMS, INC+ COMPUTER HARDWARE # 150196 10,525.00
6220 WAL-MART RECREATION REFUND 150197 143.00
12103 WALLIN HEATING & AIR, DONALD E BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 150198 5,15
213 WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES # 150199 2,029.27
4577 WELLS FARQO ~UARD SERVICES SECURITY QUARD SERVICES # 150200 3,267.88
6181 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY RECREATION REFUND 150201 73.08
12108 WHITMORE, OLLIE RECREATION REFUND 150202 80.00
12113 WOLFEIS MARKETPLACE RECREATION REFUNDS 150203 579.14
12104 WYSOCKI, SHERRY RECREATION REFUNDS 150204 48+00
509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE 150205 423.46
6283 ZOLEZIO, MICKEY ROCHESTER/LARK DR RIgHT-OF-WAY # 150206 942.00
TOTAL 571,539.92
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
April 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council,
City Manager. Jack Lain. AICP
Lawrence I. Temple. Administrative Services Director
Dawn Haddon. Purchasing Manager
APPROVAL TO DECLARE SURPLUS MISCELLANEOUS CITY-
OWNED EQUIPMENT
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council gives approval to surplus the City owned equipment on the attached
listing, which is no longer needed. obsolete or unusable.
BACKGROUND
The City's purchasing manual identifies two major categories of surplus property: materials and
supplies, and capital equipment. It is the policy of the City to request that the City Council
provide authorization to the Purchasing Agent to dispose of City property by declaring such
items surplus. Methods of disposition can be transferred to another department, trade-in. sale by
bid or auction, sale as scrap. donation. or simply trashing.
As the replacement of various pieces of equipment has occurred. the miscellaneous items listed
are surplus to the City's need and should be disposed of.
Respectfully submitted,
Lawrence I. Temple
Attachments
cc: Sharon Leonard
/7
GENERAL HARDWARE SURPLUS
LIST
HARDWARE
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/120
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
SERIAL NUMBER
US71705802
KR42355324
US71705923
KR33401349
US71703456
KR41542714
US71705809
KR42051502
US71564181
KR42051502
US71701703
KR42051466
US72707344
KR42051466
US61952373
KR33813059
US72707238
KR42355325
US72707126
KR42355162
US71705897
KR60187986
US70955775
KR53964281
US71057747
KR42355152
US71705811
KR54267391
US71705934
KR42355237
FA#
1625
1622
1628
1627
1631
1621
1661
1440
1632
1637
1629
1630
1626
1623
1624
BOX#
Bx.9
Bx. lO
Bx.11
Bx.12
Bx.13
Bx,14
Bx.15
Bx.16
Bx.17
Bx.18
Bx.19
Bx,20
Bx.21
Bx.22
Bx.23
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/120
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP 14' MONITOR
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP VECTRA 5/120
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP VECTRA 5/100
HP VECTRA 5/100
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP VECTRA 5/100
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP VECTRA 51133
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP VECTRA 5/133
HP VECTRA 5/100
COMPAQ CPU 486
COMPAQ MONITOR
US72707351
KR42355367
US72707254
KR60190462
US61952331
KR42051512
US72707535
KR42354942
US72707103
KR61966577
US72707234
US72316475
KR41542715
US55057242
US72707517
US72707134
US61967863
US72614770
US71705764
US55057242
US55057330
US71703461
US55057259
US71712342
US70955703
US72707130
US71703119
US70955686
US55057328
4006HZ3H 1366
00314544B495
1667
1659
1441
1652
1656
1635
1640
1419
1660
1634
1439
1648
1662
1417
1423
1639
1418
1646
1647
1665
1643
1636
1422
840
Bx.24
Bx.25
Bx.26
Bx.27
Bx.28
Bx.29
Bx.30
Bx.31
Bx.32
Bx.33
Bx.33
Bx.33
Bx.33
Bx.34
Bx.34
Bx.35
Bx.35
Bx.36
Bx.36
Bx.36
Bx.36
Bx.37
Bx.37
Bx.38
Bx.38
General Hardware Surplus
List
Hardware
s/zq #
FA ~
HP Vectra CPU
HP Vectra CPU
HP Vectra CPU
HP Vectra CPU
HP Vectra CPU
HP Vectra CPU
HP Laser Jet 4Plus
HP VL 5/133
HP 14'Monitor
HP VL 5/133
HP Monitor
HP VL 5/133
HP Monitor
HP VL 5/133
HP Monitor
HP VL 5/133
HP Monitor
HP VL 5/133
HP Monitor
HP VL 5/133
HP Monitor
HP VL 5/133
HP Monitor
HP VL 5/133
HP VL 5/133
HP VL 5/133
HP VL ~/133
HP VL 5/133
HP VL 5/133
HP VL 5/133
HP VL 5/133
HP VL 5/133
US71705897
US70955775
US71057747
US71705811
US71705934
US
JPFF014118
US72316362
KR33402714
US72707292
KR53964372
US72707381
KR42456201
US72707113
KR42456058
US61965668
KR42560779
US72707100
KR33711213
US72707214
KR33711146
US71703157
KR42355163
US71701703
US71564181
US71703456
US71705923
US71705802
US72707344
US61952373
US72707238
US72707126
01629
01630
01626
01623
01624
0
01658 Bx.1
01653 Bx.2
01657 Bx.3
000286 Bx.4
01438 Bx.5
01655 Bx.6
01664 Bx.7
01620 Bx.8
01621
01631
01628
01622
01625
01661
01440
01632
01637
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 9, 2000
Dawn Haddon, Junior Buyer
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
Sigmund M. Dellhime, Management Analyst II
Disposal of Surplus Vehicles - Revised
The following vehicles were replaced and are awaiting disposal as surplus equipment.
ASSET #
0765
0963
0978
1156
1159
1251
1255
1158
1237
0974
VIN ID LICENSE MAKE MODEL YEAR
IFTHF25MOJPA41777 513 076003 Ford F-250 Pickup 1989
2FAPP36X7KBI46211 326 208636 Ford Tempo 1989
IGNCTIgZOK8164163 208 208567 Chevrolet Blazer 1989
1GNCSISZTMSI31277 223 289593 Chevrolet Blazer 1991
2FAPP36XXKB234167 327 267260 Ford Tempo 1990
1FMCU22X4MUC04740 334 286888 Ford Explorer 1991
IGIJC54G5MJ185073 330 343003 Chevrolet Cavalier 1991
1GCCSI4Z7MSI25297 910 289577 Chevrolet S-10 Pickup 1991
1HTGHAAT9HRH614844 634 353814 Ford F-450 1990
IGCDM15Z9KBI71971 235 382205 Chevrolet Astro Van 1989
Thank you for your assistance and please let me know if you need any additional information.
CO:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager
MODEL #
5355
5053
5085
5018
5053
5090
5018
XEROX MACHINES
SERIAL NUMBER
'3T8205375
2Y5050147
88Y008313
71P173269
2Y5047655
W81079780
71P190293
22.
RAN
CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
April 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR CUP 98-17,
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE
AND ARROW HIGHWAY, SUBMITTED BY MIKE GIURIBINO
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the
annexation of certain territory to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 6, for CUP 98-17.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Conditional Use Permit 98-17, generally located at the southwest corner of Hermosa
Avenue and Arrow Highway, was approved by the Planning Commission on
December 9, 1998, for a request to construct 128,197 square foot public storage on
4.22 acres of land. The City Council approved the improvement agreement and
improvement security on February 17, 1999.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:HM:sd
Attachment
2.3
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF
RANCHO .CUCAMONGA
RESOLUTION NO. O~9 "' ~Z
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION TO OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 98-17
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the armexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
EXHIBITA
Aim All Slorage
Proposed Self Storage Facilily
CUP 98-17
SWC Arrow & Hermosa Avc
ARROW ROUTE
OFFI('E~{~
/ \ / \
F
B
G 1t //
STORY
\ / \ / I I
B-3 -~ B-2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNABDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: CUP 98-17
STREET LIGHTS:
Dist. 5800L
St
S6
NUMBER OF LAMPS
9500L 16,000L 22,000L
27,500L
LANDSCAPING:
Community
Equestrian
Trail
Dist. D.G.S.F.
L3B
Turf Non-Turf Trees
S.F. S.F. Ea.
Parcel Acres
4.22
* Existing items installed with original project.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By District
S1 S2 L3B
4.22 4.22
Annexation Date: April 5, 2000
Form Date 11/16/94
,;-7
THE CITY
~ANCHO
OF
CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
April 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR
CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER
REDUCTION ANNUAL PAYMENT BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT
OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF RECYCLING
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga approve a resolution for
California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Annual Payment by the
California Department of Conservation Division of Recycling
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to Section 14581 (a)(4)(A) of the California Beverage Container Recycling and
Litter Reduction Act, the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling (Division)
is required to distribute a total of $10,500,000 to eligible cities and counties for
beverage container recycling and litter cleanup activities.
Each city may receive a minimum of $5,000 or an amount calculated by the Division,
per capita based, whichever is greater. The per capita amount calculated by the
Division, is based upon the population of the incorporated areas of the city, as stated in
the Annual Demographic Report submitted to the Governor by the Department of
Finance.
The eligible participant must provide a description of an activity(ies) that meet one or
more of the following criteria do:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CALIFORNIA BEVERGE CONTAINER RECYCLING
AND LI'I'I'ER REDUCTION ANNUAL GRANT
April 5. 2000
Page 2
· The activity has a primary emphasis on collection and recycling of beverage
containers at large venues, public areas, residential communities or schools;
· The activity has a primary emphasis on public education promoting beverage
container recycling and/or litter prevention; or
The Activity has a primary emphasis on beverage container litter prevention and/or
abatement in public places including community clean-up projects or related
activities involving the recycling of beverage containers.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been allocated $35,602.00 to do programs related
to "Recycling and/or Litter Reduction Activities". We are proposing the following for
these funds:
· Purchase recycling bins for parks and facilities that have vending machines and/or
snack bars that sell beverage containers
We will work with non-profit or sports groups to maintain the recycle containers. The
incentive being they can keep the proceeds for the recycling of the beverage
containers. This is being done by a couple of cities with good results.
We will use some of the funds to do public education on cable and in the newspaper
with emphasis on recycling beverage containers in the recycle bin(s) at the curb or
at city parks and facilities.
Work on a school program to get recycling in as many schools as we can. We
already have a number of schools on service, but this would help to expand the
recycling efforts.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO/bz
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 00--05"~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR
CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LI'I'I'ER
REDUCTION ANNUAL PAYMENT BY THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF RECYCLING
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California
Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act that provides funds to cities and
counties for beverage container recycling and litter cleanup activities; and
WHEREAS, the California Depadment of Conservation's Division of Recycling has
been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State,
setting up necessary procedures for cities and counties or their designees under the
program; and
WHEREAS, per Section 14581 (a)(4)E) of the California Beverage Container and
Litter Reduction Act, the eligible participant must submit the Funding Request Form by the
due date and time in order to request funds from the Department of Conservation's Division
of Recycling.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, authorizes the submittal of the Funding Request Form to the Department of
Conservation's Division of Recycling. The City Engineer, is hereby authorized and
empowered to execute in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga all necessary forms
hereto for the purposes of securing payments and to implement and carry out the purposes
specified in the Section 14581 (a)(4)(A) of the California Beverage Container and Litter
Reduction Act and provide information regarding this program to the Division upon request.
THE CITY
RANCHO
OF
CUCAMONGA
SmffRe rt
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECt:
April 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O 'Neil, City Engineer
Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF DISPOSITION OF A PORTION OF CITY OWNED
PROPERTY, GENERALLY WITHIN THE NORTHTOWN AREA,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERON BOULEVARD, WEST OF
HERMOSA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY NORTHTOWN HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the
disposition of a portion of City owned property, generally within the Northtown area, located
on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of Hermosa Avenue and authorize the Mayor and
the City Clerk to sign said resolution.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Northtown Housing Development Company (NTHDC) is currently processing CUP 98-30
for construction of a Community Center. In conjunction with this processing, NTHDC has
requested the vacation of certain unimproved alleys that are contiguous to the proposed
Community Center. These alleys are currently not being used for access by adjacent
properties since there are no visible openings from the adjoining properties and are not
needed for public use.
NTHDC, property owner of Lots 7 through 10 of Block 5 of the Map of the Town of West
Cucamonga, is requesting that a portion of the City owned alley be incorporated to their
property through a quitclaim process since said alley was conveyed through a grant deed.
The quitclaim process will concurrently proceed with a lot merger. On January 27, 1999, the
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
NORTHTOWN HOUSING
April 5, 2000
Page 2
Planning Commission determined the proposed quitclaim would conform with the General
Plan and on May 5, 1999, said alley was processed for vacation. Through these proceedings,
the property owner will obtain said portion of City owned alley and use the land as part of
said lots 7 through 10.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:dlw
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN
ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING THE
DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT
CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATYACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT
"D" AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO THE PERSON
NAMED THEREIN
1. Recitals
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has a fee interest in that certain portion of a City-
owned alley generally the Northtown area, located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of
Hermosa Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, California, and
hereinafter referred to in this Resolution as "said property." A full, true and complete description
of said property is Set forth in that copy of deed attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference
set forth herein.
(ii) Califomia Govemment Code Section 37350 provides as follows:
"A Cit~ may purchase, lease, receive, hold and enjoy real and personal property, and control
and dispose of it for the common benefit."
(iii) Califomia Government Code Section 37351 provides in pertinent parts, as follows:
"The legislative body (City Council may...dispose of, and convey such property for the
benefit of the City..."
(iv) The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga heretofore made the
findings on January 27, 1999, that disposing of said portion of City-owned property, as herein
contemplated, would be in conformity with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
(v) Said portion of City-owned property was granted to the City ofRancho Cucamonga
through a Grant Deed for alley purposes for which it was granted.
(vi) Said property constitutes a burden on the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is no longer
necessary or convenient for the purposes for which it was granted.
(vii) Conveyance of said property will further the use of said property and benefit the City
of Rancho Cucamonga by deletion of a necessity to maintain said property.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
NORTHTOWN HOUSING
April 5, 2000
Page 2
(viii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution has occurred.
2. Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find,
determine, and resolve as follows:
1. All facts stated in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution hereby are found to be true and
correct.
2. This Council hereby finds that the quit claiming of said property to the persons described
in said deed will benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
3. The Mayor and City Clerk hereby are authorized and directed to execute the deed, a full,
true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and cause the same to be recorded
forthwith upon adoption of this Resolution.
4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description
(AREA TO BE QUITCLAIMED)
That portion of Block 5 of the Map of the Town of West Cucamonga, as recorded in Book 13 of
Maps, pages 1 and 2, records of the County Recorded of the County of San Bemardino, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
That portion of Lot 6 of said Block 5 lying westerly of the easterly 135.00 feet of said
Block 5.
As shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.
MAP SHALL ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
t/'_-~__----4-'-" I
0 25 50
SCALE 1'=50'
BASE ~INE RD,
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENG~r~G nrnmoN
VlCl/VITY MAP
N
Assessor Parcel No.:
209-085-04
RECORDr~G REQUESTED BY
City ofRancho Cucamonga
WI-TEN RECORDED MAIL TO
City ofRancho Cucarnonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucarnonga, CA 91730
MAIL TAX STAT15MENT$ TO
Name:
Street
CIty &
S~ate:
SPACE ABOVE THIS UNE FOR RECORDER'S USE
DOCUMENTARY I'I~ANSFER TAX $
COMPtJiED ON FULL VALUE OF pROPERlY CONVEYED
OR COMPU1 t.D ON FUU, VALUE LESS UENS AND
ENCUMBRANCES RENLedNING AT TIME OF SALF_
CORPORATION QUITCLAIM DEED
FOR. A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
The City ofRancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation under the laws of the State of California, hereby
REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to
"NORTHIXiTaN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
that certain real propervJ in the City ofRancho Cucarnonga, County of San Bemardino, State of California~
described and shown on the attached Exhibits "A" mqD"B" .
ACCEPTED:
CIT/OF RANCHO ~GA,
BY:
A MUNICIPAL CORPOBATION
.. MAYOR
ATEEST:
ATTACH COMPLETED NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT(S)
E X H I B I T "'~'D"
3F
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
SmffRe rt
DALE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
April 5, 2000
Mayor and members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Willie Valbuena. Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NQS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 99-08, LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TM
STREET, SUBMI'FI'ED BY RANCHO CUCAMONGA RETIREMENT
RESIDENCE LLC
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the
subject agreement and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing
the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
CUP 99-08, located at the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street, in the
Low-Medium Residential District, was approved by the Planning Commission on June 9,
1999. This project is for the construction and operation of a two-story residential care
facility for the elderly on 5.1 acres of land.
The Developer, Rancho Cucamonga Retirement Residence LLC, is submitting an
agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in
the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond
$52,230.00
Labor and Material Bond:
$26,115.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CUP 99-08
April 5, 2000
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. The
Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City
Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
li~am~jr'~. o, Nei~ll~(
city Engineer
WJO:WV:sd
Attachments
I~TN STREET
PROPOSED
~NAMI _TON 5T
blIGNLAND AVE
,,,
>
w <~ '>
z
~/ ,,,
FOOTNILL BLVD
I~ FREE~,~T
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
NORTH
ITEM:
TITLE:
EXHIBIT:
RESOLUTION NO. O~-655
A RESOLUTION OFTHE CITY COUNCILOFTHE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR CUP99-08
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for
its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on April 5, 2000, by Rancho
Cucamonga Retirement Residence LLC as developer, for the improvement of public right-
of-way adjacent to the real properly specifically described therein, and generally located
at the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19t" Street; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the
development of said real property referred to as CUP 99-08; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good
and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement
Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on
behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest
thereto; and
2
That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and
sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof
by the City Attorney.
RESOLUTION NO. ~ --~9,_¢b
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 99-08
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance
District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex
the properb] described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
referenced to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of properly within the territory proposed to be annexed
to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the
proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property
as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached
hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the
levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
EXHIBIT "A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND
H(ATH[t
AY[NU[
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
NORTH
STREET LIGHTS:
Dist. 5800L
S1 --- '4 & 2
S6 '3 ---
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: CUP 99-08
NUMBER OF LAMPS
9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
LANDSCAPING:
Community
Equestrian
Trail
Dist. D.G.S.F.
L3B ---
Tuff Non-Tuff Trees
S.F. S.F. Ea.
...... 42
* Existing items installed with original project.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By District
Parcel Acres S1 S6 L3B
-- 5.1 10.2 5.1 5.1
Annexation Date: April 5, 2000
Form Date 11/16/94
I~ a N C H 0
CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
S :fReport
DATE: April 5, 2000
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 99-52, LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAN MARlNO STREET AND
CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, SUBMITrED BY QLTMANS
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving
Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, and ordering the annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No.3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1
and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DR 99-52, located on the southwest corner of San Madno Street and Charles Smith
Avenue, was approved by the City Planner on January 13, 2000. for a warehouse
building addition of 104,400 square feet.
The Developer,Oltmans Construction Company, is submitting an agreement and
security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond
Labor and Material Bond:
$45,000.00
$22,5000.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DR 99-52
April 5, 2000
Page 2
Letters of approval have been received Cucamonga County Water District. The
Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City
Clerk's office.
Respectfully submit~,ed,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:HM:sd
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
SA~;yI~ARINO DR. '<~
>~ 6TH ST.'
· .....
...'....:
ROUTE ARROW
"-.4TH. STREET
SAN .BERNARDINO 'FRWY'
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RESOLUTION NO. ~l} --0,~7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR DR 99-52
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for
its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed by Oltmans Construction Company
as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property
specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest corner of San Marino
Street and Charles Smith Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the
development of said real property referred to as DR 99-52; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good
and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on
behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest
thereto; and
2
That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and
sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof
by the City Attorney.
RESOLUTION NO. ~°O-(8
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANGHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOB. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 99-52
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territor~ to the Maintenance
District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex
the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
referenced to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed'
to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the
proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:.
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property
as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached
hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the
levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
EXI.III31T "A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCi~PE MAINTENANCE DISTI~ICT NO.3 R
STI(EET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTI~.ICT NOS. I AND ~,
N O'Og'lO' [ b ~ 515.82'
........... ~ ..../F.:-,~;~;y--~.-
¢ BUFFALO AVENUE ~ ~ I
t=
I'N~CEL ~' NO. 150)2 PMU 183/4-8
..
I':~" .-, "' ',.""''
'~' ": :.':' ' '/:""";:'.:'
m ,'.t P~CEL ,2 ,
' . ' '. P~CEL ~'NO. l~012 ,;
~ ;.',.:
~ PMD I8J/4-8 .
~ ..
' '' SUBJECT PROPERTy
,.~...
m' '.':'
..~..~.:,. ::{U':'.:.:.': ." ' .-'.
¢ CI~ 5MIIII A~NU[ (FOII~Y I(OCIILSILR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNAI~d)INO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STREET LIGHTS:
Dist. 5800L
S1 3
S6
EXHIBIT "b"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: DR 99-52
NUMBER OF LAMPS
9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
LANDSCAPING:
Community
Equestrian
Trail
Dist. D.G.S.F.
L3B
Turf Non-Turf Trees
S.F. S.F. Ea.
26
Parcel Acres
13.34
* Existing items installed with original project.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By District
S1 S2 L1
26 13 13
Annexation Date: April 5, 2000
Form Date 11/16/94
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
S tffRepogt
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
April 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT
13759, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH
OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, SUBMI'FrED BY FORECAST
GROUP, L.P., AND RELEASE OF PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND MONUMENTATION CASH
DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY
20, 1999, FROM OVERLAND HAVEN, LLC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution (1) accepting the
new Improvement Agreement, Security (amended) and Monumentation Cash Deposit,
(2) releasing the previous Improvement Agreement and authorizing the Finance
Department to refund the previous Monumentation Cash Deposit, and (3) authorizing
the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign the new agreement and security endorsement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Map, the Improvement Agreement, Security, and Monumentation Cash Deposit for
Tract 13759, located on the west side of Haven Avenue north of the Southern Pacific
Railroad, was approved by City Council on January 20, 1993. The Tract Map was
recorded on March 16, 1993.
The property has been purchased by Forecast Group, L.P., who has submitted an
agreement and amendment to the previous security to guarantee the completion of the
public improvements in the following amounts:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 13759
April 5, 2000
Page 2
Faithful Performance Bond (Amended): $1,326,000.00
Labor and Material Bond (Amended): $ 663,000.00
Monumentation Cash Deposit: $ 5,200.00
The above mentioned bonds were originally submitted by the previous developer,
Overland Haven, LLC., and accepted by City Council on January 20, 1999. The surety
company and Overland Haven, LLC., have agreed to and amended the previous bonds
listing Forecast Group, L.P., as the principal with all else on the bonds remaining the
same. By process of this agreement, Forecast Group, L.P., as the new Developer, has
responsibility of the project, and the previous bonds remain in effect.
Copies of the agreement and securities with amending endorsement (rider) are
available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:PV:sd
Attachments
1
~ItCtMtT~ t~gf
CITY OF RAiNClIO CUCAiVIONGA
ENG~G DIVISION
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE GITY GOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUGAMONGA, GALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND MONUMENTATION GASH DEPSIT FOR
TRACT 13759 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON
JANUARY 20, 1999
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, did
consider an Improvement Agreement, related Security and Monumentation Cash
Deposit, submitted by Forecast Group, L.P., as developer, for the improvement of public
right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally
located on the west side of Haven Avenue north of the Southern Pacific Railroad and
release of the previously approved Improvement Agreement, Security and
Monumentation Cash Deposit for Overland Haven, LLC.
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good
and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement
Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES THAT (1) said Improvement Agreement, Security
and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by Forecast Group, L.P. are hereby
approved, (2) the previously approved Improvement Agreement and Monumentation
Cash Deposit from Overland Haven, LLC, are released and (3) the Mayor is hereby
authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement and Security on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
RANCHO
C UCAM ONGA
COMMUNITY SERVICES
TO;
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
BY:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Nettie Nielsen, Recreation Supervisor
April 5, 2000
APPROVAL TO RENEW THE CONTRACT WITH HOLIDAY PRINTING FOR THE
PRINTING OF THE GRAPEVINE FOR THE AMOUNT OF $70,572.00 FOR FOUR
ISSUES.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council renew the contract for the quarterly printing of "The Grapevine"
brochure to Holiday Printing for the amount of $70,572.00. The contract is for a one (1)
year period and covers the printing of four (4) issues: Summer 2000, Fall 2000, Winter
2001 and Spring 2001.
BACKGROUND:
Each quarter, Winter, Spring, Summer and Fall, the City of Rancho Cucamonga
publishes a 48 page brochure, "The Grapevine", which includes a City newsletter and
recreation program schedule. Approximately 53,000 copies are printed, 48,000 of which
are direct mailed to City residents. City staff does most of the pre-press production in-
house including: collection of information, typesetting, layout, graphics and photos. The
City contracts with a printer to prepare the final pre-press work, print and bind the
magazine and distribute it to the City and to a mailing service, which ultimately delivers
"The Grapevine" to the Post Office. For this contract year the Grapevine is increasing
from a 44-page brochure to a 48-page brochure. This increase is necessary due to the
growing recreational programs and greater emphasis on addressing City issues in the
newsletter portion.
CITY COUNCIL
Approval of Printing Contract for "The Grapevine"
April 5, 2000
Page 2
In 1997/98 a competitive bid process was completed and the contract was awarded to
Holiday Printing, who had been printing the Grapevine for several years. All local
printers were provided the opportunity to submit bids on the project. The contract was
awarded for a one year period, renewable annually, if performance merits it, for up to
three years. After completion of a successful year, the City wishes to renew the contract
with Holiday Printing for a third year.
In accordance with the original bid specifications and contract, this will be the last
renewable contract. In Fall 2000, the City will begin to prepare specifications for a new
Request for Proposal process. All printers will be given the opportunity to bid on the
contract which would take effect in the Spring of 2001.
The contract amount, $70, 572.00 represents an increase of $5,972 over last years
contract, which was $64,600.00. This increase is due to two factors. First, the last
contract called for printing four issues at 44 pages. This contract calls for printing four
issues at 48 pages. This change represents $5,168 of the increase, including increased
paper costs, The remainder, $804, reflects an increase ($200 per issue) for ink that is
used on the full color pages. Staff is confident in the quality of the work from Holiday
Printing, and their level of customer service is outstanding.
Fiscal Impact: The Summer 2000 issue is included in the Community Services
Department General Fund Budget for 1999/2000. The amount of the contract,
$70,572.00 is included Community Services General Fund (01) budget request for
Fiscal Year 2000/2001.
Community Services Director
cc: Dave Moore
Nettle Nielsen
Karen Silhanek
\\SRV_RC\Departments\COMMSERV~Grapevine\reportholiday4.5.00.doc
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Services Department
Contract Services Agreement
2000/2001 Printing of "The Grapevine"
This agreement is entered into the City of Rancho Cucemonga by and between the Community
Services Department, (hereinafter called CITY) and Holiday Pdntine (hereinafter called
CONTRACTOR). Whereas, the CITY needs a professional pdnter for the quarterly pdnting of'The
Grapevine" magazine, and whereas the CONTRACTOR has signified a willingness and is qualified
to undertake the required work in connection therewith, the following provisions shall govem this
contract.
TERMS: The terms of this agreement shall be that the CONTRACTOR shall provide printing
and bindery services on a quarterly basis for the City magazine, 'q'he Grapevine", for the
following issues: Summer 2000, Fall 2000, Winter 2001 and Spring 2001.
PRINTING SPECIFICATIONS: The CONTRACTOR agrees to adhere to these specifications
and to fumish the following services to the City: 1 ) Quarterly pdntjng of the magazine to include
four (4) issues at forty-eight (48 pages) each. 2) Paper Required: 50~ Eureka recycled or equal.
3) UV ink on the four-color process pages including the cover. 4) Quantity: 53,000 copies per
issue, to be increased if needed. 5) Electronic pre-press services: convert disk to film,
shoot/scan, crop and place half tones, blueline, and co!or key. 6) One side of signature (4
pages) in four color, the remainder in two color (Black and one PMS color). 7) Complete bindery
service including stapling and boxing of issues. 8) Delivery to City specified mailing service and
to City Hall - Community Services Department Office.
CONDITIONS/ARRANGEMENTS: The CONTRACTOR is responsible for obtaining and
supplying all matedais, supplies and equipment necessary to provide the service. The
CONTRACTOR is also responsible for the care of all City-owned or contracted equipment and
property. The CONTRACTOR is to provide and promote quality service and product and reflect
a positive 'image of the CI'I:Y. The CONTRACTOR agrees to adhere to the time lines and
publicet~on schedule as presented by the CITY. The CONTRACTOR agrees to pick up computer
disks, photos, cover artwork and other items relating to the publication of each issue from City
Hall after notificetjon from the CITY that the materials are ready. The CITY agrees to provide the
CONTRACTOR with a completed layout, fonts, artwork, photos and cover design for each issue.
4. COMPENSATION: The _CONTRACTOR agrees to provide the CITY with a wdtten invoice after
the completion of each issue. The CITY agrees to pay the CONTRACTOR for service rendered
in the amount of $17,643 for each 48- page issue. Total annual compensation of $70,572.00
based on the specifications outlined. CiTY and CONTRACTOR agree to negotiate additional
costs that may be incurred if the specifications are changed.
CONTRACTOR: It is understood that the CONTRACTOR is not an agent or employee of the
City but is a self employed person/business and is therefore not eligible to lay claim to benefits
from Social Security, State Unemployment Insurance, or to those benefits reserved for
employees of the City.
6. REPORTING OF INCOME: lt is the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR for propedy reporting
all monies eamed as a result of work done for the CITY to the State and Federal Governments.
The CITY shall distribute Intemal Revenue Form 1099 to the Federal Govemment describing
monies earned by the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR shall receive a copy for tax
purposes.
7. TERMINATION: The CITY shall reserve the dght to terminate this contract at any time, upon
the failure of the CONTRACTOR to comply with the terms and intent of the agreement.
8. CONTRACT LENGTH: This contract is for one (1) year and includes the following four issues
of The Grapevine: Summer 2000, Fall 2000, Winter 2001 and Spring 2001.
ASSIGNMENTS: The CONTRACTOR shall not, under any circumstances, assign this contract
or its duties without proper authorization from the CITY. Should such an authorization be
granted, the CONTRACTOR agrees to inform any subcontractor of all stipulations of this
agreement.
10. INDEMNIFICATION, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFENSE: The CONTRACTOR hereby agrees
to indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its directors,
officers, employees, and agents for any damage or injury to any person or property from any
cause whatsoever which may incur, due to the presence and/or activities of the CONTRACTOR
on or about premises owned and/or controlled by the CITY, except for a cause of injury or
damage which is the result of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY, its
employees or servants.
11. PREVIOUS AGREEMENT: Any and all existing agreements or renewals between the parties
hereto, covedng the same subject matter, are hereby canceled and superseded by this
agreement and such pdor arrangements shall have no further force or effect.
City of Rancho Cucamonaa
Contractor
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Business Name
Date Owner
Address
Telephone
Signature Date
RANCHO
ENGINEERING
CUCA MON GA
DEPARTHENT
Stag Report
DATE:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
April 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
REQUEST TO ENTER INTO COMMUNIATIONS SITE GROUND LEASE
AGREEMENT AT HERITAGE PARK BETWEEN COX
COMMUNICATIONS AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR
THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
FACILITY FOR COX'S PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICE
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Mayor sign this Agreement entering into this Communications
Site Ground Lease Agreement with Cox Communications.
BACKGROUND
Cox Communications has been negotiating a Communications Site Ground Lease
Agreement with City staff for the placement of an electronic transmission facility for
Cox's personal communication service. at Heritage Park. The City Council previously
approved the "Access License Indemnity Agreement" at its November 7, 1999 meeting
to allow Cox Communications and their consultant onto the site to perform feasibility
tests.
ANALYSIS
Community Development staff, in conjunction with the City Attorney's office, has been
reviewing several draft agreements over the past several months. A final Agreement
(attached) has been approved by the City Attorney's office and contains the following
key elements of the terms and conditions:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
HERITAGE PARK CELL
April 5, 2000
Page 2
Rent: The initial Annual Rent shall be twelve (12) thousand dollars ($12,000.00) paid in
advance, then in twelve (12) equal monthly installments due on the first of each month.
On July I of each lease year and any extensions thereto, the Annual Rent shall
increase by the C.P.I. (Consumer Price Index) of the then current Annual Rent in effect.
Access: Access to the premises shall be available to Lessee at all times, 24 hours per
day, 7 days per week in accordance with City access policies
Respectfully Submitted,
~L~~pment
RG:dw
Director
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
I~NCINI~EI~INC DEDAI~TM~NT
Staff Report
DATE: April 5, 2000
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Brent Mickey.
ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED, AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $128,639.06
($116,944.60 plus 10% contingency) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER,
K.A.S. EQUIPMENT & RENTAL, INC., FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
THE ADA 1999/2000 ACCESS RAMP AND DRIVE APPROACH
IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS ALONG HERMOSA
AVENUE, HAVEN AVENUE, 6TM STREET AND ARROW ROUTE, TO BE
FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.'S 324637,9804
AND 32-4637-9113, AND TDA ART 3 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 16-4637-
9106
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received, and award and
authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $128,639.06 ($116,944.60 plus
10% contingency) to the apparent low bidder, K.A.S. Equipment & Rental, Inc., for the
construction of the ADA 1999/2000 Access Ramp and Drive Approach Improvements at
various locations along Hermosa Avenue, Haven Avenue, 6th Street and Arrow Route,
to be funded from Measure I funds, Account No.'s 32-4637-9804 and 32-3637-9113,
and TDA Art 3 funds, Account No. 16-4637-9106.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 14,
2000, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $113,000. Staff has
reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ADA 1999/2000 ACCESS RAMPS AND DRIVE APPROACH IMPROVEMENTS
April 5, 2000
Page 2
bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds
all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
~~Neisu~tte.~
City Engineer
WJO:JAD
Attachment
EXHIBIT "A"
Banyan Street
Highland Avenue
B~e Lh~e Ro~
Foo~chi~l B~.vd
LEGEND
N.T.S. ~ v,o~,s.~
ADA t999/2000 ACCESS RAMP AND DRIVE APPROACH IMPROVEMENTS
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR
ADA ACCESS RAMPS ALONG HERMOSA AVE, HAVEN AVE,
6TH STREET AND ARROW ROUTE AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Bids Opened on March 14, 2000
Engineer's Estimate = $I 13,000.00
Item Item Unit of Estimated
No. Description Measure Quantity
1 Clearing & Grubbing LS 1
2 Asphalt Concrete Pavement TON 65
3 Remove Tree EA 2
4 Adj. MH Frame & Cover to Grade EA 1
5 Adj. Irrigation Control Valve EA 3
6 Adj. CATV Box & Cover to Grade EA I
7 6" P.C.C. Curb Incl. Removals LF 48
8 8" P.C.C. Driveway Approach SF 7443
9 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk, inc. Removals SF 2639
.10 8" Thick Stamped PCC SF 60
11 P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp SF 5428
· 12 P.C.C. Spandrels inc. Removals SF 1651
13 P.C.C. Splash Curbs LF 101
14 Adj. Water Meter Box to Grade EA 2
15 Rockscape SF 746
16 Restore Hardscape & Landscape LS 1
17 Traffic Control LS 1
18 Relocate Traffic Signs & Mailbox LS I
ICA. S. Equipment
Total
Unit Price Bid
$5,000.00 $5,000.00
$80.00 $5,200.00
$800.00 $1,600.00
$300.00 $300.00
$50.00 $150.00
$150.00 $150.00
$30.00 $1,440.00
$4.00 $29,772.00
$2.90 $7,653.10
$10.00 $600.00
$4.00 $21,712.00
$12.50 $20,637.50
$35.00 $3,535.00
$50.00 $100.00
$7.50 $5,595.00
$3,000.00 $3,000.00
$10,000.00 $10,000.00
$500.00 $500.00
$116,944.60
H&HGeneral Contractors CDE Resources, Inc.
Total Total
Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid
$9,600.00 $9,600.00 $9,988.00 $9,988.00
$134.00 $8,710.00 $124.00 $8,060.00
$480.00 $960.00 $262.00 $524.00
$250.00 $250.00 $315.00 $315.00
$185.00 $555.00 $73.00 $219.00
$250.00 $250.00 $102.00 $102.00
$21.00 $1,008.00 $29.00 $1,392.00
$5.60 $41,680.80 $5.00 $37,215.00
$3.00 $7,917.00 $4.10 $10,819.90
$28.00 $1,680.00 $14.60 $876.00
$4.00 $21,712.00 $4.80 $26,054.40
$3.00 $4,953.00 $6.00 $9,906.00
$34.00 $3,434.00 $21.50 $2,171.50
$210.00 $420.00 $216.00 $432.00
$8.00 $5,968.00 $6.70 $4,998.20
$3,500.00 $3,500.00 $954.00 $954.00
$3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,344.00 $3,344.00
$600.00 $600.00 $476.00 $476.00
$116,997.80 $117,847.00
Item Item Unit of EstimatedI
No. Description Measure Q ?tity
ua
1 Clearing & Grubbing LS
2 Asphalt Concrete Pavement TON 65
3 Remove Tree EA 2
4 Adj. MH Frame & Cover to Grade EA 1
5 Adj. Irrigation Control Valve EA 3
6 Adj. CATV Box & Cover to Grade EA 1
7 6" P.C.C. Curb Incl. Removals LF 48
8 8" P.C.C. Driveway Approach SF 7443
9 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk, inc. Removals SF 2639
I0 8" Thick Stamped PCC SF 60
11 P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp SF 5428
12 P.C.C. Spandrels inc. Removals SF 1651
13 P.C.C. Splash Curbs LF 101
14 Adj. Water Meter Box to Grade EA 2
15 Rockscape SF 746
16 Restore Hardscape & Landscape LS 1
17 Traffic Control LS 1
18 Relocate Traffic Signs & Mailbox LS 1
S. Parker Eng.
Total
Unit Price Bid
$3,000.00 $3,000.00
$35.00 $2,275.00
$1,200.00 $2,400.00
$500.00 $500.00
$200.00 $600.00
$200.00 $200.00
$28.00 $1,344.00
$7.00 $52,101.00
$3.?5 $9,896.25
$20.00 $1,200.00
$4.25 $23,069.00
$12.00 $19,812.00
$12.00 $1,212.00
$100.00 $200.00
$12.00 $8,952.00
$3,000.00 $3,000.00
$3,000.00 $3,000.00
$500.00 $500.00
$133,261.25
GentryBrothers
Total
Unit Price Bid
$6,500.00 $6,500.00
$80.00 $5,200.00
$400.00 $800.00
$200.00 $200.00
$75.00 $225.00
$100.00 $100.00
$15.00 $720.00
$5.50 $40,936.50
$3.25 $8,576.75
$11.00 $660.00
$8.00 $43,424.00
$9.00 $14,859.00
$25.00 $2,525.00
$75.00 $150.00
$12.00 $8,952.00
$6,000.00 $6,000.00
$1,500.00 $1,500.00
$1,200.00 $1,200.00
$142,528.25
RANCO Corp.
Total
Unit Price Bid
$2,500.00 $2,500.00
$90.00 $5,850.00
$500.00 $1,000.00
$400.00 $400.00
$25.00 $75.00
$50.00 $50.00
$15.00 $720.00
$9.00 $66,987.00
$3.75 $9,896.25
$5.00 $300.00
$8.00 $43,424.00
$7.25 $11,969.75
$20.00 $2,020.00
$25.00 $50.00
$7.00 $5,222.00
$5,000.00 $5,000.00
$2,500.00 $2,500.00
$500.00 $500.00
$158,464.00
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
ENG1NEEI~ING DEPADTMENT
StaffRe rt
DATE: April 5, 2000
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam. AICP, City Manager
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Brent Mickey,
ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED, WAIVE ANY AND ALL MINOR
IRREGULARITIES IN THE BIDDING DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY
THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $245,952.84
($223,593.49 plus 10% contingency) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER,
RVC ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF THE SAPPHIRE STREET PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS FROM
MOON COURT TO ALMOND STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM
MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 324637-9606
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received, waive any and all
minor irregularities in the bidding documents submitted by the apparent low bidder, and
award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $245,952.84
($223,592.29 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent low bidder, RVC Roadway
Construction, Inc., for the construction of the Sapphire Street Pavement Improvements
from Moon Court to Almond Street, to be funded from Measure I funds, Account No. 32-
4637-9606.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 14,
2000, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $206,000. Staff has
reviewed all bids received and found them to be compete and in accordance with the
bid requirements, with the exception of a mathematical error found in the bid of RVC
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SAPPHIRE STREET PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS AWARD
April 5, 2000
Page 2
Roadway Construction, when corrected, found them to be the apparent low bidder.
Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet
the requirements of the bid documents.
~. Offu~,Nei~
City Engineer
WJO:JAD
Attachment
EXHIBIT "A"
AlmondSl~t
Hillside Road
LIMITS
PAVEMENT
IMPROVEMENTS
MOON CT. TO
ALMOND STREET
Bauym $~ree~
Sapphire Street Pavement Improvements
VICINITY MAP
BIDS OPENED: March 14, 2000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUMMARY OF BID PROPOSALS FOR
SAPPHIRE STREET PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS FROM
MOON COURT TO ALMOND STREET
Engineers Estimate: $206,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION
I Clearing and Grubbing
2 Miscellaneous P.C.C. Removal
3 Unclassified Excavation iF)'
4 Relocate Mailbox
5 Remove tree
6 Crushed Aggregate Base
7 0.18' thick Asphalt Concrete Pavement
8 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix - Gap Graded Oveday, Variable thickness
9 Variable Depth Cold Plane 0 to 0.10' deep
10 Construct 3" AC Driveway
11 Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade
12 Adjust Valve Can and Cover to Finish Grade
13 Adjust Water Meter Box to Grade
14 Reconstruct Mailbox to match existing
15 Construct PCC Undersidewalk Drain OutIet per detail
16 Construct PCC Curb and Gutter
17 Construct 6" PCC Residential Drive Approach
18 Construct 8" PCC Commercial D.A. inc. tiebars
19 Construct 4" PCC Driveway
20 Construct PCC Spandrel with tiebars
21 Install 4" PVC pipe curb outlet drain
22 Plant 15 Gal tree
23 Restore landscaping and irrigation
24 Traffic Control
25 Signing, Striping, Markings and Markers
Gentry Brothers
Total
QTY. UNIT Unit Pdca Bid
1 LS $ 29,000.00 $ 29,000.00
1269 SF $ 1.50 $ 1,903.50
300 CY $ 30.00 $ 9,000.00
4 EA $ 100.00 $ 400.00
8 EA $ 300.00 $ 2,400.00
160 TON $ 13.00 $ 2,080.00
113 TON $ 35.00 $ 3,955.00
2500 TON $ 53.00 $ 132,500.00
11518 SY $ 1.10 $ 12,669.80
86 SF $ 1.50 $ 129.00
8 EA $ 200.00 $ 1,600.00
26 EA $ 50.00 $ 1,300.00
2 EA $ 50.00 $ 100.00
I EA $ 159.00 $ 150.00
I LS $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
658 LF $ 11.00 $ 7,238.00
814 SF $ 3.50 $ 2,849.00
309 SF $ 4.00 $ 1,236.00
423 SF $ 3.00 $ 1,269.00
42 SF $ 10.00 $ 420.00
2 EA $ 100.00 $ 200.00
9 EA $ 250.00 $ 2,250.00
I LS $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
1 LS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
I LS $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00
$ 224,149.30
RVC Roadway .,~
Total
Unit Pdce Bid
$ 4,804.00 $ 4,804.00
$ 2.45 $ 3,109.05
$ 22.87 $ 6,861.00
$ 85.00 $ 340.00
$ 425.00 $ 3,400.00
$ 23.00 $ 3,680.00
$ 30.74 $ 3,473.62
$ 56.54 $141,359.00
$ 1.14 $ 13,130.52
$ 2.50 $ 215.00
$ 300.00 $ 2,400.00
$ 15.00 $ 390.00
$ 15.00 $ 30.00
$ 300.00 $ 300.00
$ 3,100.00 $ 3,100.00
$ 18.45 $ 12,140.10
$ 3.95 $ 3,215.30
$ 3.95 $ 1,229.55
$ 3.15 $ 1,332.45
$ 9.45 $ 396.90
$ 525.00 $ 1,050.00
$ 770.00 $ 6,930.00
$ 2,050.00 $ 2,050.00
$ 1,200,00 $ 1,200.00
$ 7,475.00 $ 7,475.00
$ 223,593.49
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1 Cleadng and Grubbing
2 Miscellaneous P.C.C. Removal
3 Unclassified Excavation (F)
4 Relocate Mailbox
5 Remove tree
6 Crushed Aggregate Base
7 0.18' thick Asphalt Concrete Pavement
8 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix - Gap Graded Oveday, Vadable thickness
9 Variable Depth Cold Plane 0 to 0.10' deep
10 Construct 3" AC Driveway
11 Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade
12 Adjust Valve Can and Covei' to Finish Grade
13 Adjust Water Meter Box to Grade
14 Reconstruct Mailbox to match existing
15 Construct PCC Undersidewalk Drain Outlet per detail
16 Construct PCC Curb and Gutter
17 Construct 6" PCC Residential Drive Approach
18 Construct 8" PCC Commercial D.A. inc. tiebars
19 Construct 4" PCC Driveway
20 Construct PCC Spandrel with tiebars
21 Install 4" PVC pipe curb outlet drain
22 Plant 15 Gal tree
23 Restore landscaping and irrigation
24 Traffic Control
25 Signing, Striping, Markings and Markers
Laird Construction
Total
QTY. UNIT Unit Price Bid
I LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
1269 SF $ 1.00 $ 1,269.00
300 CY $ 25.00 $ 7,500.00
4 EA $ 50.00 $ 200.00
8 EA $ 500.00 $ 4,000.00
160 TON $ 25.00 $ 4,000.00
113 TON $ 50.00 $ 5,650.00
2500 TON $ 54.50 $ 136,250.00
11518 SY $ 1.10 $ 12,669.80
86 SF $ 5.00 $ 430.00
8 EA $ 250.00 $ 2,000.00
26 EA $ 150.00 $ 3,900.00
2 EA $ 250.00 $ 500.00
I EA $ 500.00 $ 500.00
1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
658 LF $ 17.50 $ 11,515.00
814 SF $ 4.00 $ 3,256.00
309 SF $ 5.00 $ 1,545.00
423 SF $ 3.75 $ 1,586.25
42 SF $ 30.00 $ 1,260.00
2 EA $ 250.00 $ 500.00
9 EA $ 100.00 $ 900.00
1 LS $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
I LS $14,318.95 $ 14,318.95
I LS $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00
$ 232,750.00
Silvia Construction
Total
Unit Pdce Bid
$ 5,750.00 $ 5,750.00
$ 4.05 $ 5,139.45
$ 20.80 $ 6,240.00
$ 200.00 $ 800.00
$ 610.00 $ 4,880.00
$ 25.50 $ 4,080.00
$ 48.00 $ 5,424.00
$ 57.85 $144,625.00
$ 1.05 $ 12,093.90
$ 1.10 $ 94.60
$ 260.00 $ 2,080.00
$ 29.00 $ 754.00
$ 76.00 $ ' 152.00
$ 1,970.00 $ 1,970.00
$ 5,860.00 $ 5,860.00
$ 15.10 $ 9,935.80
$ 4.15 $ 3,378.10
$ 7.60 $ 2,348.40
$ 2.65 $ 1,120.95
$ 11.00 $ 462.00
$ 215.00 $ 430.00
$ 195.00 $ 1,755.00
$ 6,400.00 $ 6,400.00
$ 7,600.00 $ 7,600.00
$ 7,040.00 $ 7,040.00
$ 240,413.20
ITEM DESCRIPTION
I Cleadng and Grubbing
2 Miscellaneous P.C.C. Removal
3 Unclassified Excavation (F)
4 Relocate Mailbox
5 Remove tree
6 Crushed Aggregate Base
7 0.18' thick Asphalt Concrete Pavement
8 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix - Gap Graded Overlay, Variable thickness
9 Vadable Depth Cold Plane 0 to 0.10' deep
10 Construct 3" AC Driveway
11 Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade
12 Adjust Valve Can and Cover to Finish Grade
13 Adjust Water Meter Box to Grade
14 Reconstruct Mailbox to match existing
15 Construct PCC Undersidewalk Drain Outlet per detail
16 Construct PCC Curb and Gutter
17 Construct 6" PCC Residential Drive Approach
18 Construct 8" PCC Commercial D.A. inc. tiebars
19 Construct 4" PCC Driveway
20 Construct PCC Spandrel with tiebars
21 Install 4" PVC pipe curb outlet drain
22 Plant 15 Gal tree
23 Restore landscaping and irrigation
24 Traffic Control
25 Signing, Striping, Markings and Markers
QTY.
1
1269
300
4
8
160
113
2500
11518
86
8
26
2
1
1
658
814
309
423
42
2
9
1
1
1
Vance Corp.
CDE Resources
Total
UNIT Unit Price Bid
LS $ 3,950.00 $ 3,950.00 $
SF $ 3.50 $ 4,441.50 $
CY $ 19.00 $ 5,700.00 $
EA $ 235.00 $ 940.00 $
EA $ 525.00 $ 4,200.00 $
TON $ 21.00 $ 3,360.00 $
TON $ 47.00 $ 5,311.00 $
TON $ 57.00 $ 142,500.00 $
SY $ 1.10 $ 12,669.80 $
SF $ 8.00 $ 688.00 $
EA $ 260.00 $ 2,080.00 $
EA $ 70.00 $ 1,820.00 $
EA $ 125.00 $ 250.00 $
EA $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $
LS $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $
LF $ 18.50 $ 12,173.00 $
SF $ 6.00 $ 4,884.00 $
SF $ 8.00 $ 2,472.00 $
SF $ 6.00 $ 2,538.00 $
SF $ 30.00 $ 1,260.00 $
EA $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $
EA $ 350.00 $ 3, 150.00 $
LS $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $
LS $14,750.00 $ 14,750.00 $
LS $ 6,600.00 $ 6,600.00 $
$ 245,937.30
Total
Unit Pdce Bid
26,614.00 $ 26,614.00
4.40 $ 5,583.60
12.80 $ 3,840.00
113.00 $ 452.00
254.00 $ 2,032.00
18.80 $ 3,008.00
43.70 $ 4,938.10
59.70 $149,250.00
1.30 $ 14,973.40
6.50 $ 559.00
276.00 $ 2,208.00
163.00 $ 4,238.00
732.00 $ 1,464.00
185.00 $ 185.00
3,768.00 $ 3,768.00
13.30 $ 8,751.40
4.30 $ 3,500.20
5.50 $ 1,699.50
2.90 $ 1,226.70
18.00 $ 756.00
193.00 $ 386.00
99.00 $ 891.00
1,894.00 $ 1,894.00
3,400.00 $ 3,400.00
7,470.00 $ 7,470.00
$ 253,087.90
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1 Clearing and Grubbing
2 Miscellaneous P.C.C. Removal
3 Unclassified Excavation (F)
4 Relocate Mailbox
5 Remove tree
6 Crushed Aggregate Base
7 0.18' thick Asphalt Concrete Pavement
8 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix - Gap Graded Oveday, Vadable thickness
9 Variable Depth C01d Plane 0 to 0.10' deep
10 Construct 3" AC Ddveway
11 Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade
12 Adjust Valve Can and Cover to Finish Grade
13 Adjust Water Meter Box to Grade
14 Reconstruct Mailbox to match existing
15 Construct PCC Undersidewalk Drain Outlet per detail
16 Construct PCC Curb and Gutter
17 Construct 6" PCC Residential Drive Approach
18 Construct 8" PCC Commercial D.A. inc. tiebars
19 Construct 4" PCC Driveway
20 Construct PCC Spandrel with tiebars
21 Install 4" PVC pipe curb outlet drain
22 Plant 15 Gal tree
23 Restore landscaping and irrigation
24 Traffic Control
25 Signing. Striping, Markings and Markers
HoIland-Lowe
Total
QTY. UNIT Unit Pdce Bid
1 LS $17,000.00 $ 17,000.00
1269 SF $ 1.40 $ 1,776.60
300 CY $ 27.15 $ 8.145.00
4 EA $ 160.00 $ 640.00
8 EA $ 430.00 $ 3,440.00
160 TON $ 41.00 $ 6.560.00
113 TON $ 56.50 $ 6.384.50
2500 TON $ 62.20 $ 155,500.00
11518 SY $ 1.20 $ 13.821.60
86 SF $ 9.50 $ 817.00
8 EA $ 262.00 $ 2,096.00
26 EA $ 50.00 $ 1,300.00
2 EA $ 85.00 $ 170.00
I EA $ 505.00 $ 505.00
1 LS $ 3,700.00 $ 3,700.00
658 LF $ 20.00 $ 13.160.00
814 SF $ 4.30 $ 3,500.20
309 SF $ 5.50 $ 1,699.50
423 SF $ 4.20 $ 1,776.60
42 SF $ 15.50 $ 651.00
2 EA $ 525.00 $ 1.050.00
9 EA $ 325.00 $ 2,925.00
1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5.000.00
I LS $ 5.430.00 $ 5.430.00
I LS $ 7,073.00 $ 7.073.00
$ 264,121.00
R A
CHO
CUCAMONGA
ENC, INt~'DINC DI~PAI~THE:NT
DATE: April 5, 2000
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
BY:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ~ene'(~
i i
SUBJECT: AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF 1999/2000 FY LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION, OVERLAY, TO RVC
ROADWAY IN THE AMOUNT OF 152,164.32 ($138.331.20 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE
FUNDED FROM MEASURE I ACCOUNT NO. 324637-9113.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for the
construction of 1999/00 FY Local Street Rehabilitation, Overlay, to RVC Roadway in the amount of
152,164.32 ($138,331.20 Plus 10% contingency) to funded from Measure I Account No. 32-4637-
9113.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on February 22, 2000, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $159,700. Staff has reviewed all bids received and
found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the
required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid
documents.
Res ectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:LEH:dbm
Attachment
75
ONTARIO
.I FONTANA
i!
STREETS FDR PAVMT. REHAB,
(0,10' CDLI) PLA. N.E 'AND 0.10' DVERLAY>
CITY OF RANCHO 'CUCAMONGA
FY 1999/00 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
LOCATION MAP
t .//
TONm-~
-:~)
CHURCH
.I-I
ASHFORD
EFFEN....._..,'
REGIS
FOOTHILL
I FGF_ND: '~ r ~ I
s~JL ,,~SBLE O~CKS 0U' ~D~Gm) ~
~E
X1
,/iII
/ AP'
leAel
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA MONGA
1999-00 PAVRMENT I~k'iHABII ]TATION
LOCAL STREET A.C. OVERLAYS
N
77
C. HESTN.UT
FOOTHILL
LEGEND:
0.10' COLD PLANE AND 0,10'
/ /
SEAL~SIBLECR,~:K,~ (ll4'A,ND GER)
,~-I~e~C.O. DPLANE LA/R /
MAP "B"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1999-00 PAVEMENT RF, HABII ,FIATION
LOCAL STREET A- C. OVER T AYS
N
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR
FY 99/00 LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION - OVERLAY
Bids Opened on February 22, 2000
Item Item
No. Description
I 0.10' Asphalt Concrete Overlay
include Pavement Preparation and
Protection of existing Utilities
Survey Monument and Re-striping
2 Variable Cold Plane
3 Adjust Manhole-Frame to Finish Grade
4 Adjust Water Valve Box to Finish Grade
5 Traffic Control
Item Item
No. Description
! 0.10' Asphalt Concrete Overlay
include Pavement Preparation and
Protection of existing Utilities
Survey Monument and Re-striping
2 Variable Cold Plane
3 Adjust Manhole-Frame to Finish Grade
4 Adjust Water Valve Box to Finish Grade
5 Traffic Control
Item Item
No. Description
I 0.10' Asphalt Concrete Overlay
include Pavement Preparation and
Protection of existing Utilities
Survey Monument and Re-striping
2 Variable Cold Plane
3 Adjust Manhole-Frame to Finish Grade
4 Adjust Water Valve Box to Finish Grade
5 Traffic Control
I
Unit of Estimated
Measure Quantity
TON 2898
SY 25200
EA 28
EA 35
LS I
Engineer's Estimate =
RVCRoadway
Total
Unit Price Bid
$29.40 $85,201.20
Laird Construction
Total
Unit Price Bid
$29.10 $84,331.80
$1.05 $26,460.00 $0.90 $22,680.00
$300.00 $8,400.00 $200.00 $5,600.00
$15.00 $525.00 $150.00 $5,250.00
$17,745.00 $17,745.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
I $138,331.20 I $142,861.80
I All American Asphalt
Unit of Estimated Total
Measure Quantity Unit Price Bid
TON 2898 $28.00 $81,144.00
SY 25200
EA 28
EA 35
LS I
I
Unit of Estimated
Measure Quantity
TON 2898
$1.10 $27,720.00
$200.00 $5,600.00
$165.00 $5,775.00
$23,204.00 $23,204.00
[ $143,443-001
Gentry Bros. I
Total
Unit Price Bid
$38.00 $110,124.00
$1.00 $25,200.00
$200.00 $5,600.00
$100.00 $3,500.00
$2,000.00 $2,000.00
I $146,424.00]
SY 25200
EA 28
EA 35
LS I
Vance Corp.
Total
Unit Price' Bid
$30.00 $86,940.00
$0.85 $21,420.00
$195.00 $5,460.00
$67.00 $2,345.00
$27,394.00 $27,394.00
$143,559.00
SilivaConstruction
Total
unitPrice ' Bid
$39.35 $114,036.30
$0.70 $17,640.00
$200.00 $5,600.00
$148.00 $5,180.00
$7,500.00 $7,500.00
$149,956.30
Item Item
No. Description
I 0.10' Asphalt Concrete Overlay
include Pavement Preparation and
Protection of existing Utilities
Survey Monument and Re-striping
2 Variable Cold Plane
3 Adjust Manhole-Frame to Finish Grade
4 Adjust Water Valve Box to Finish Grade
5 Traffic Control
I
Unit of Estimated
Measure Quantity
TON 2898
SY 25200
EA 28
EA 35
LS I
Pave West
Total
Unit Price Bid
$44.17 $128,004.66
$0.85 $21,420.00
$300.00 $8,400.00
$50.00 $1,750.00
$2,500.00 $2,500.00
I $162,074.66
Unit Price
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00.
$0.00
I
Total
Bid
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00 I
R A
CUCAMONGA
ENGINI~EI~ING DI~PADTNENT
StaffR
DATE: April 5, 2000
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
BY:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ~e~
i i
SUBJECT: AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF 1999/2000 FY LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION, SLURRY SEAL, TO
CALIFORNIA PAVEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $231,040.60 ($210,036.91 PLUS 10%
CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I ACCOUNT NO. 32-4637-9113.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for the
construction of 1999/00 FY Local Street Rehabilitation, Slurry Seal, to California Pavement in the
amount of $231,040.60 ($210,038.91 Plus 10% contingency) to funded from Measure I Account No.
32-4637-9113.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on February 22, 2000, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $335,280. Staff has reviewed all bids received and
found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the
required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid
documents.
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:LEH:dbm
Attachment
See Map
See Ma:
UPLAND
It
STREETS FDR PAVMT. REHAB.
(SLURRY SEAL TYPE II)
PARKS FDR PAVMT. REHAB.
(SLURRY SEAL TYPE I)
;eer Map "A"
;ee Map "C"
ONTARIO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FY 1999/00 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
LOCATION MAP
N.T,S. j
LEGEND:
I
I
SLURRY SF_AI. '~'PE II
c~ SEAL (~14' ANO LARGER) PRIOR TO ~LURRY
MAP. "A"
C][TY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
1999-00 PAVEMENT REHABII ,FIATION
SLURRY SEAL TYPE II
N
LEGEND:
· · · ,S[_URRY SEAt. TYPE 11
MAP "B"
CITY OF RABICHO CUCAMONGA $
W ~
1999-00 PAVE';ME'Y~ RFHABII.ITATION s
SLURRY SEAL TYPE 1I ms
BANYAN
HIGHLAND AV ~
LEGEND:
· · · SLURRYSEALTYPEII
CRACK SEAL (114" N',ID LA~GF_R) PRIOR TO SLURRY
MAP "C"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
1999-00 PAVEMENT RF, HABII JTATION
SLURRY SEAL TYPE
N
/
HIGHLAND AV
LEGEND:
Z
tu
>
"r
SLURRY SEN,: TYPE 11
~ SF..N. (114' AND LARGF. R) PRIOR TO SLLIRRY
MIG
MAP "D"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1999-00 PAVFjMRNT RF, HABII ,FIATION
SLURRY SEAL TYPE II
N
Z
.%
GRANDVIEW
AUGUSTA DR.
Z
0 ~
0
LA VINE
ROAD
/
NORTHVIEW
BASELINE
~ ~ ~. ~ r~ __.f
LEGEND:
· .- /'WILDROSE
· · · SLURRY SEAL TYPE II
C.,3~ACK SEAL (1/4' AND LARGER) pRICR TO SLURRY
RD
MAP "E"
C~TY OF RANCHO CUCA B~ONGA
1999-00 PAVEMENT REHABII ]TATION
SLURRY SEAI, TYPE II
N
CHURCH
H~M~OCK
~ ~ ASHFORD
NORWICK
" '/*" EFFEN
LEGEND:
MAP "F"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1999-00 PAVEMFNT REHABR ITATION
SLURRY SEAL TYPE 1I
N
rn
D ;o
IRADEMARK
·
me
I-
ENTERPRISE
· ·
·" COMMERCE
4TH STREET
.. TRA..~MARK ~WY.
"S, TRADE~VlARK pK~I
Z
· LEGEND:
SLURRY SEAL TYPE II
CRACK SEAL (1/4" AJ~rD L.a4:IC-F_R) pRIOR TO SLURRY
MAP "G"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA]MJLONGA
1999-00 PAVFfMENT RF, HABII ,ITATION
LOCAL STREET REHAB
N
HILLSIDE ROAD
DRESSA(
AREA 'i:O RECEIVE SLURRY SEAL TYPE I
E Q UESTRIA N
T!
IHADE SHELTER
· ~-
HARDCOURT W
N
,,~S0.CCER FUELS->
EQUESTRIAN
TRAIL
LEGEND:
MAP-P1
HERR'AGE PARK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA MONGA
1999-00 PAVEMENT REHABII ,FIATION
SLURRY SEAL TYPE I
N
· BASELINE .ROAD
LEGEND:
MAP-P2
RED'HILL PARK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1999-00 PAVE";MFNT I~k'JtABII ,ITATION
SLURRY SEAL TYPE I
Iq
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR
99/00 LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION-SLURRY SEAL
Bids Opened on February 22, 2000
Item
No.
1
Item
Description
Rubberized Slurry Seal Type It
incl crack-sealing, protection of
existing survey monuments,
manholes & valve covers etc.
restriping and pavement markings
Rubberized Slurry Seal Type I
(for Park only), including crack-
sealing, protection of existing
survey monuments, manholes and
valve covers, etc., restriping and
pavement markings
3 Traffic Control
Engineer's Estimate =
California Pavement Valley Slurry Seal
Unit of Estimated Total Total
Measure Quantity Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid
SY 237641 $0.7740 $183,934.91 $0.7980 $189,638.32
SY 23000 $0.7740 $17,802.00 $0.9450 $21,735.00
LS I
$8,300.0000 $8,300.00 $7,500.0000 $7,500.00
I $110,036.91 I'$218,873.32
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
~NGINEEI~ING DEI) AI~TMENT
SmffRe rt
DATE: April 5, 2000
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
BY:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Linda R. Beck, Jr. Engineer ~
SUBJECT:
ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND,
ACCEPT A DEPOSIT AS A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 98-17, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, SUBMITTED
BY MICHAEL A. GIURIBINO
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for CUP 98-17, have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is
recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept Receipt 01-
89635 in the amount of $2,925.00 as a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of CUP 98-17, located on the southwest comer of Hermosa Avenue
and Arrow Route, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been
completed and it is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept
the Maintenance Bond.
Developer:
MICHAEL A. GIURIBINO
2200 COTA STREET
NORCO, CA 91760
Release: Faithful Performance Bond 67438 $29,250.00
Accept: Maintenance Bond (CASH) REC. 01-89635 $ 2,925.00
_J 1
0
,I V CJ
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINE, ERING DIVISION
N
· :F~k'T~I~: CUP 98-17
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGMT.
~I~. VICINITY MAP
9~
RESOLUTION NO. ~ ¢~ -/~ b 0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 98-17 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 98-17,
have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County.
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
ENGINEEI~ING DEPA~TMI~NT
StaffRe rt
DATE: April 5, 2000
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY:
Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer
SUBJECT:
ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
BONDS, ACCEPT MAINTENANCE BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 13564, -1, -2, -3, -4,
LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON BETWEEN WARDMAN BULLOCK AND SAN
SEVAINE, SUBMITFED BY STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Tracts 13564, -1, -2, -3, -4, have been completed in an acceptable
manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Performance Bonds and accept Maintenance Bonds.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Tracts 13564, -1, -2, -3, -4, located north of Wilson,
between Wardman Bullock and San Sevaine, the applicant was required to complete street
improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that City Council
release the existing Faithful Performance Bonds and accept the Maintenance Bonds.
Developer:
STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION
1565 West MacArthur Boulevard
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACTS 13564-1,-2,-3,-4
April 5, 2000
Page 2
Release: Faithful Performance Bond
Accept: Maintenance Bond
Tract 13564-2
Tract 13564-2
Tract 13564-2
Tract 13564-2
Tract 13564-2
Tract 13564-1
Tract 13564-1
Tract 13564-3
Tract 13564-4
Tract 13564,
Tract 13564-2
Tract 13564-2
Tract 13564-2
Tract 13564-2
Tract 13564-2
Tract 13564-1
Tract 13564-1
Tract 13564-3
Tract 13564-4
Tract 13564
3334 5626
3334 5634
3335 6524
3335 6532
3335 6540
3334 5527
3334 5519
3337 0525
3337 0533
3337 0541
$1,034,000
$ 59,000
$1,003,000
$ 208,000
$ 148,000
$ 779,000
$ 23,338
$ 508,000
$ 448,000
$ 366,000
3334 5626 $ 103,400
3334 5634 $ 5,900
3335 6524 $ 100,300
3335 6532 $ 20,800 -
3335 6540 $ 14,800-
3334 5527 $ 77,900
3334 5519 $ 2,334 -
3337 0525 $ 50,800
3337 0533 $ 44,800
3337 0541 $ 36,600
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:LRB:Is
Attachments
Z
N3~VH
YSOI'I2:I3H
YNC3NV~
O"l~"81H311V
J.S.AHI:1FIV
CI~4~'/~3NIA m--~
RESOLUTION NO. ~-' 0/~ /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACTS 13564, -1, -2, -3, -4 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tracts 13564, -1, -2, -3,
-4, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
complete.
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City
Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San
Bemardino County.
RA N C H O C U C A M O N GA
]~NCIN~i~ING DEPAD. T~II~NT
StaffRepo/t
DATE:
TO:
April 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
BY:
Willianl J. O'Neil, City Eugineer
Jerry Dyer, Associate Engineer
BrentMickey, EngineeringTech ifffcian
SUBJECT:
ACCEPT THE VINEYARD AVENUE BUS BAY PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 99-095
AS COMPLETE, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $84,557.00
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that tile City Cotmcil accept tile Vineyard Avenue Bus Bay Project, Contract No. 99-
095. as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion aud authorize the release of
the Perlbmmnce Bond 35 days after recordation of the Notice of Completion and release the retention in
thc aumunt of $8,455.70, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of
$84,557.00.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
TIle subject project Ires been completed iu accordance with tile approved plans and specifications and to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is
$84,557.00. The original coiltract amount approved by Council was $79,286.00.
Respectftdl y su bill itted,
City Engineer
WJO:JAD:dbm
Attachnlents
EXHIBIT "A"
VACANT-FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
FUTURE
BUSBAY
Foothill Boulevard
GAS
STATION
N ,T,S.
CONDOS
Arrow Route
CONDOS
BUS BAY
LOCATION
GAS
STATION'
PUBLIC
STORAGE
9th Street
SEARING
INDUSTRIES
BUS BAY
LOCATION
SEARING
S
ABANDONED BLDG~/~
(OLD EGG RANCH)
FUTUREBUSBAY
VACANT LOT
Vineyard Avenue Bus Bays- 4 Locations
VICINITY MAP
/,~/
RESOLUTION NO. (~ O-- O~ Z.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
VINEYARD AVENUE BUS BAY PROJECT, AS COMPLETE,
AND AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Vineyard Avenue
Bus Bay Project, Contract No. 99-095, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is anthorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino.
THE CITY
o~
CUCAMONGA
StaffRe rt
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
April 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brad Buller, City Planner
Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01
- CATELLUS - A request to amend the Industrial Area Specific Plan definition of
Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvements to conditionally permit
buildings over 25,000 square feet.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City Council approved this land use amendment in June of 1999; however, the approval action
was taken via a Resolution instead of an Ordinance. The City Attorney has confirmed that the
proper method to approve the land use amendment is through an Ordinance. This item simply re-
approves the subject land use amendment in accordance with City Attorney direction. A complete
explanation of the proposed text amendment is attached in the original staff report.
FACTS FOR FINDING
The proposed amendment is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
IASPA 99-01 - CATELLUS
April 5, 1999
Page 2
CORRESPONDENCE
This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the
property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the
project site.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:BLC/Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 28, 1999
Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes dated April 28, 1999
Exhibit "C" - City Council Minutes of June 2, 1999
Planning Commission Resolution No. 99-35
Ordinance approving Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-01
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '
STAFF REPORT
April 28, 1999
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AM ENDMENT 99-01 - CATELLUS - A request
to allow the Community Commercial use on approximately 5.2 acres of land in
Subarea 7 (industrial Park) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the
southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN: '229-011-32.
ABSTRACT: The applicant has requested amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP)
definition of Specialty Building Supplies and Home improvements to allow buildings over 25,000
square feet when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. This amendment is necessary to
accommodate a Lowe's Home Improvement store proposed at the southeast corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Milliken Avenue.
ANALYSIS:
General: The proposed text amendment would allow for home improvement stores to be
developed within Subarea 7. An application has been submitted for a Lowe's Home
Improvement store of approximately 185,225 square feet (135.200 square feet of floor area
and 49.025 square feet of garden center) and two restaurant pad buildings. The site falls
within Subarea 7 (Industrial Park) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Subarea 7 is intended
to function as a transition between large warehouse industrial development to the south and
the Tetra Vista planned community to the north. In this vein, Subarea 7 currently allows for
retail and wholesale Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvement stores of 25,000
square feet or less. Staff believes that a large home improvement center would be consistent
with this transition of land use.
The use is being proposed as a conditionally permitted use. Lowe's has filed Conditional Use
Permit 99-04 in anticipation of the proposed amendment being approved. Site and use
specific issues would be analyzed and addressed with the Conditional Use Permit.
Environmental Assessment: The proposed amendment is not defined as a project by the
California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15378 and is, therefore, exempt from
environmental review per CEQA Section 15061 (b)l.
Facts for Findinq: The proposal is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the
General Plan. The proposal will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or uses and will not
cause adverse environmental impacts.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
ISPA 99-01- CATELLUS
April 28, 1999
Page 2
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were m~iled to all property owners within
a 300~foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of
this amendment to the City Council through adoption of the attached Resolution.
Brad Bulier
City Planner
BB:BLC/jfs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Subarea 7 Map
Exhibit "C" - Applicant's Letter
Resolution Recommending Approval to City Council
Janua~ 9,1999
Brad Buller, City Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
RE: Application Submittal Package for the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan
Dear Mr. Buller:
On behalf of the Catellus Development Corporation, we are submitting applications for a
Development Review for the Master Plan, a Specific Plan Amendment to the Industrial Area
Specific Plan, a Tentative Parcel Map, and the associated environmental Initial Study for property
located on approximately 140 acres in the southeast sector of Rancho Cucamonga.
The Master Plan has been prepared to serve as a guide for projects within an overall development
framework directed toward achieving development consistency with the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Industrial Area Specific Plan. The Master Plan further specifies master design cdteda while
meeting the individual design and development needs of specific projects within the area.
We are submitting a Development Review application for the Master Plan which receives approval
at the Planning Commission level. Concurrently, the Specific Plan Amendment application is
submitted, which continues on for City Council consideration after Planning Commission action.
While we realize that no final permits could be approved for an individual project until that Specific
Plan Amendment receives final reading, it does allow the project to move forward in design phases.
Another component to the process is the separate submittal by Lowe's Home Center for a
Conditional Use Permit to develop the site at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken
Avenue. The application is expected to be submitted to the City in approximately one week. This
will constitute the first phase of development for the Subarea 7 portion of the Corporate Park.
W~th this Application Package submittal, we are submitting the following items:
Uniform Application for Development Review, Specific Plan Amendment and Tentative Parcel Map
Completed/nitial Study, Part I
Filing Fees fora total of $20,340.00
Development Review - $8553.00
Specific Plan Amendment - $8598. O0
Tentative Parcel Map - $2514.00
Initial Study- $675.00
copies of Master Plan
Note: The Master Plan document is being submitted in a 3-ring binder format for ease of
review and revision. The final Master Plan document will be provided in a bound format.
4200 Latham Street, Suite B, Riverside, California 92501 "909 / 787-9222 · FAX 909 / 7814014 · E-Mail: HIRiveN}pacbell.net
Brad Bullet, City Planner Page 2
Application Package-Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan
Q
Q
0
8 sets of development package including Master Site Plan, Conceptual Building Elevations, Master
Landscape Plan, Landscape and Hardscape Elevations, Tentative Parcel Map, Conceptual Grading
Plan and Conceptual Utility Plan
5 sets of typed gummed labels, including all required public notice materials
Note: It is anticipated that this notice information can be used for the Lowe's Conditional
Use Permit application provided that public hearing timing coincides with the Master Plan
schedule.
Hazardous Waste and Site Statement
1 set of photographs with location map
A Traffic Study is being prepared and will be .submitted to the City within two weeks
Comments received from the Planning Commission at the Pre-Application Review on January 13,
1999, and from staff at our weekly meetings during the past month have proved to be invaluable
in guiding us to a Master Plan document that we feel will best serve Catellus and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. We truly appreciate your continued guidance on this project. Should you
have any questions, please contact me or David Rogers at (909) 787-9222.
Sincerely,
Principal
attachments
cc:
Charles A. McPhee, Catellus Development Corporation
Craig Halverson, Catellus Development Corporation
Jerry McKee, Catellus Development Corporation
Dennis Hill, Hill Pinckert Architects
Charles Lamb, Emerald Design
Don Winn. Lowe's
Page Winkler. Nadel Architects
Thomas Baber. Adams Engineering
enclosure
Commissioner Mannerino commented that he supported staffs reco ~on.
Motion Moved by Mannerino seconded by Stewart ' sue a Negative Declaration and adopt
the resolution approving Time Extension fort ve Tract 15247. Motion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: MANNERI CNIEL, STEWART
NOES: NO
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - CATELLUS - A request to allow
Community Commercial use on approximately 5.2 acres of land in Subarea 7 (Industrial Park)
of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and
Foothill Boulevard - APN: 229-011-32.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15295 - CATELLUS -
A subdivision of 140 acres of land into 13 parcels in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7) and
General Industrial (Subarea 8} Districts of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on
Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route - APN: 229-O11-25, 31, and
32. Related file: Development Review 99-11.
NEW BUSINESS
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-11 - CATELLUS o
A request to establish a 140 acre master plan known as the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate
Park, consisting of a mix of commercial and industrial development in Subarea 7 (Industrial
Park) and Subarea 8 (General Industrial) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on
Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route - APN: 229-011-25, 31, and
32. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map 15295.
Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and displayed a prospective
rendering submitted by the applicant for the Activity Center area. He reported that staff received
three telephone calls from the public requesting that the driving range on the southeast corner of
the master plan area remain open. He remarked that the driving range had been approved as a
temporary use and the plan had always been to delete it. He observed that the driving range is
leased from Catellus and that would be an issue between the property owners and the lessee.
Chairman McNiel stated it was his understanding that the driving range had already closed.
Mr. Le Count could not confirm that it had.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Pare Steele, Hogle-lreland, 4200 Latham Street, #8, Riverside, stated she represented CateIlus.
She said they had changed the plans to conform to the Commission's comments which were given
at the Pro-Application workshop. She reported they had already submitted three applications in
connection with the master plan. She accepted the conditions and indicated that Charles Mc Phee
was planning to address the Commission regarding his intent with the master plan.
Planning Commission Minutes
-3- April 28, 1999
BI
Commissioner Mannedno asked if the driving range is closed.
Ms. Steele responded that Mr. Mc Phee indicated it is.
Chades Mc Phee, Senior Vice President in the southwest for Catellus Development, 4000
Westedy Place, Suite 200, Newport Beach, stated that they are focused on long term real estate
ownership. He expressed appreciation for the City's review of the project.
Chairman McNiel observed that the applicant was requesting a departure from the established
Activity Center concept and he asked that the corner be pedestrian friendly and no less than what
is required by code. Hearing no further testimony, he closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Mannerino stated that so long as the applicant found the conditions acceptable,
he supported the project.
Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Mannedno, to adopt the resolutions recommending
approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-01 and approving Tentative Parcel Map
15295 and Development Review 99-11 and to issue a Negative Declaration in regards to the
Parcel Map and Development Review. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MACIAS, TOLSTOY
DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
F.
- carried
USE DETERMINATION 99-01 - CHEVRON - A request to determine th
to other Auto Service Station uses and is a condltionally permitted
Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Boulevard S Plan.
Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, presented the staff rep,
Chairman McNiel asked if the applicant is ramill
service stations.
Mr. Grahn responded affirmatively.
Commissioner Stewart asked il
Mr. Grahn replied
of this parcel.
Chairman invited public comment.
h is similar
Community
development standards with respect to
vice station is included within the designated Activity Center
same shopping center but the Activity Center area is to the east
~iman, Chevron Products Company, 1300 Beach Boulevard, La Habra, agreed with staffs
and said he was available to answer questions.
There were no further public comments.
Planning Commission Minutes
-4- April 28, 1999
112-
city ccu.ci, Mi.utes
June 2, 1999
page
PARCEL MAP 14786 FROM MED IDENTIA'L (8 TO 14 DWELLING UNITS
· ' tied
unanimouslY
Improvements" to conditionally permit buildings over 25,000 square feet.
Staff repo~ presented by Brent LeCount, Associate Planner.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Ci~ Council was:
Pare Steel, Castellus & Lowes, stated they agree and suppo~ sta~s recommendation,
There being no fu~her response, the public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-122
A RESOLUTION OF THE CI~ COUNCIL OF THE CI~ OF ~NCHO
CUCAMQNGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIALAR~SPECIFIC P~N
AMENDMENT 99-01, AMENDING THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC P~N
DEFINITION OF SPECIALTY BUILDING SUPPLIES AND HOME
IMPROVEMENTS TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT BUILDINGS OVER 25,000
SQUARE FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curalalo to approve Resolution No. 99-122.
unanimously, 5-0.
Motion carried
G. PUBLIC HEAHINbb
No Items Submitted. y
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPC'
' H1. CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDAT~r'F'/~ROM THE PARK' AND RECREATION
COMMISSION FOR A PROPOSED EXPANDED OMER SERVICE pROGRAM AT CITY FACILITIES
AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PICNIC ARE NTAL FEE POLICY
Staff report presented by Kevin rdle, Community Services Director. '~
Councilmember Cur asked if the staff that work would have flexible work schedules.
Kevin McA , Community Services, Director, stated they would have flexible schedules depending on what
is goi n for the weekend.
//a
RESOLUTION NO. 99-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, A
REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF SPECIALTY BUILDING
SUPPLIES AND HOME IMPROVEMENTS TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT
BUILDINGS OVER 25.000 SQUARE FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. Hogle Ireland has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment
99-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."'
2. On the 28th day of April 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
headrig on that date.
3, All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE. it is hereby found. determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals.
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 28.1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. The F~pose~ ~'~'ndment will not have a significant impact on the environment;
and
c. The proposed amendment furthers the intent of Subarea 7 to function as a
transition between industrial development to the south and commercial/retail development to the
north.
3, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan and the Development Code; and
//,-/
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
ISPA 99-01- HOGLE IRELAND
April 28, 1999
Page 2
99-35
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Industrial Area
Specific Plan and the Development Code; and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial
evidence, it can be seen with cedainty that the amendment is not defined as a project, therefore,
the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)l and
15738.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment
No. 99-01 amending Page 111-14 regarding the definition of Specialty Building Supplies and Home
Improvements, as attached,
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
iel, Chairman
ATTES~/~~~etary
I, Lawrence J. Henderson, AICP, Acting Secretary for the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of April 1999, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERIN0, MCNIEL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, TOLSTOY
//5
Industrial ~rea S~ecific Plan Parr IIL. ZecHon H
Restau~n~ ~ Bar or Ente~inmen~ ~i~es ~pi~lly in~ude, ~ am not lim~ to: ~e
m~il ~le, ~m ~e promises, of un~g~ f~d or ~vemges, including ha~ liquor,
gene~ pm~ br o~mm~es ~sum~on. U~ ~pi~l~ include, b~ ~ n~ limff~ to:
ms~u~n~ ~ ha~ liquor sales, danring, or en~inmen~ m~il lounge; and barn.
Proposed
Specific
Plan
Amendment
~oecialty Bulldine SueDlies and Homo Imerovements: Ac~,ities typically include, but am not
limited to: retail and wholesale sales and installation of specialty items, such as paint;
wall/floor/window coverings; doors and windows; building materials; hardware, plumbing and
electrical supplies; beth and kitchen fixtures and supplies; lighting; swimming pools and
supplies; and garden furnishings, materials and supplies. Activities shall be conducted in
enclosed buildings of 25,000 square feet or less. Uses excluded from this category are general
merchandtse s~ores.~Buildlngs over 25,000 square feet may be permitted when approved
by a Conditional Use Permit.
Warehouse-Style Retail Merchandisina Business: W~thin an approved Warehouse-Style Retail
Merchandising Center, this catsgory adds to the retail uses already permitL~ for the Subarea
in which the Center is slated. Retail uses shall be added which are consistent with General
Commercial Uses wiffiln the General ComrnerdaJ District of the Development Code (Section
17.10.030) and which are incorporated heroin by reference. In the event of a conffict between
whether a use is permit~-~d or conditionally permit~:ed, the Subarea requirement applies. Ught
Wholesale, Storage and Dist~buflon is already a pe.t ii~-d use. The intent is to emphasize and
expand retail use in conjunction with warehouse use in Subarea 12 which is transffional .
between indus~al and retail commercial land use areas.
E CIVIC USE TYPES
Administ~tive Civic Services: Acl~vifies typically include. but are not limited to: management,
administrative, or dedcal services performed by public, quasi-public, and public ~lity
administraWe offices.
Convention Centers: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: conferences, seminars,
produc~ demonstrations, and toumaments within an enclosed building for assembled groups
or spectators or pa~cipants. Uses typically include convention centers and exhibffion halls.
~ultural: Ac'dvities typically include, but are not limited to, those performed by or at the
following ins'~tutions or installations:
Public and private performing arts canters (i.e., music, dance, drama) not including
nightclubs;
Public and private museums and art galleries;
Public and private libraries and observatories.
Day Care FacilitY: Activities typically include. but are not limited to: establishments for non-
medical care to infants and preschool and school age children under 18 years of age dudn9
a portion of the day. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: infant centers, nursery
schools, pre-schcols, and similar facilities.
6/97
ORDINANCE NO. 620
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, AMENDING THE INDUSTRIAL AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN DEFINITION OF SPECIALTY BUILDING SUPPLIES AND
HOME IMPROVEMENTS TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT BUILDINGS
OVER 25,000 SQUARE FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. Cattellus has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-01 as
described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereina~er in this Ordinance, the subject Industrial Area
Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as the "application."
2. On the 28th of April 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said
public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 99-35 thereby recommending to this City Council that said
application be approved.
3. On April 5, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said hearing, adopted
Resolution No.99-122.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
Gity of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
"A," of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 5, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan;
and
b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and
the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to theadjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties; and
No.99-122.
This amendment is identical to that previously approved by City Council Resolution
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced pubic hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that the project has
been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based
upon substantial evidence. it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed
Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-01, to modify the
Industrial Area Specific Plan definition of Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvements to
conditionally permit buildings over 25,000 square feet of as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" as
well as any related text, tables, figures, and maps to maintain consistency.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Rancho Cucantonga Development Code
Section 17.30. 030
not limited to: computer training and driving schools. day care facilities, travel
bureaus, and photography studios.
if. Petroleum Products Storape: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: bulk
storage, sale, and distribution of gasoline, liquefied petroleum gas, and other
petroleum products.
gg. Recreational Facilities: Activities typically include, but are not limited to,'sports
performed either indoors or outdoors which require a facility for conducting the
recreational activity. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: health clubs,
exercise studios or classes, swimming centers, skating rinks, bowling alleys, tennis
courts, spods fields, and golf courses.
hh. Repair Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, repair services
involving articles such as upholstery, furniture, and large electrical appliances.
it. Restaurants: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: retail sale, from the
premises, of unpackaged food or beverages generally prepared for on-premise
consumption. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: restaurants with
incidental serving of beer and wine, cafeterias, and delicatessens; and they exclude
fast food type of services, cocktail lounges, bars, entedainment, and dancing.
Restaurants with Bar or Entedainment: Activities typically include, but are not limited
to: the retail sale, from the premises, of unpackaged food or beverages, including
hard liquor, generally prepared for on-premise consumption. Uses typically include,
but are not limited to: restaurants with hard liquor sales, dancing, or entedainment;
cocktail lounges; and bars.
kk.
Specialty BuildinQ Supplies and Home Improvements: Activities typicalty include, but
are not limited to: retail and wholesale sales and installation of specialty items, such
as paint; waIIl~oorlwindow coverings; doors and windows; building materials;
hardware, plumbing and electrical supplies; bath and kitchen fixtures and supplies;
lighting; swimming pools and supplies; and garden furnishings, materials and
supplies. Activities shall be conducted in enclosed buildings of 25,000 square feet
or less. Buildings over 25,000 square feet may be permitted when approved by a
Conditional Use Permit. Uses excluded from this category are general merchandise
stores.
II.
Warehouse-Style Retail Merchandisinq Business: Within an approved Warehouse-
Style Retail Merchandising Center, this category adds to the retail uses already
permitted for the Subarea in which the Center is situated. Retail uses shall be added
which are consistent with General Commercial Uses within the General Commercial
District of Section 17.10.030. In the event of a conflict between whether a use is
permitted or conditionally permitted, the Subarea requirement applies. Light
Wholesale, Storage and Distribution is already a permitted use. The inlent is to
emphasize and expand retail uses in conjunction with warehouse use in Subarea 12
which is transitional between industrial and retail commercial land use area_s:
5. Civic Use Types.
Administrative Civic Services: Activities typically include. but are not limited to:
management, administrative, or clerical services performed by public, quasi-public,
and public utility administrative offices.
17.30-17 6/99
the
Rancho
city
Cucamonga
of
Staff Report
DATE:
April 5, 2000
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Brad Buller, City Planner
BY:
Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
CONSIDERATION OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDEMENT 99-01
- LEWIS HOMES - A request to amend the Terra Vista Community Plan to
redesignate the land use district for Parcel I of Parcel Map No. 14788 from
Medium Residential (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre) to Elementary School, located
at 7889 East Elm Avenue - APN: 1077-421-81.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City Council approved this land use amendment in June of 1999; however, the approval action
was taken via a Resolution instead of an Ordinance. The City Attorney has confirmed that the
proper method to approve the land use amendment is through an Ordinance. This item simply re-
approves the subject land use amendment in accordance with City Attorney direction. A complete
explanation of the proposed amendment is attached in the original staff report.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Part I of the Initial Study was prepared by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II, the
Environmental Checklist, and determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the
environment. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
FACTS FOR FINDING
The property is suitable for the uses permitted in the land use and Terra Vista Community
Plan designation in terms of access, size, and surrounding land uses.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TVCPA 99-01 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT
April 5, 2000
Page 2
The proposed amendment would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the
sun'ounding propedies as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study which
indicates that no significant impacts would be expected as a result of this land use change.
The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan, the Development Code,
and the Terra Vista Community Plan because of the site's ability to promote the goals and
objectives for the Elementary School District.
CORRESPONDENCE
This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper as a public hearing.
Public hearing notices were mailed to all properly owners within 300 feet of the project site.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:BLC/ma
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Repod of April 14, 1999
Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes of April 14, 1999
Exhibit "C" - City Council Minutes of June 2, 1999
Planning Commission Resolution 99-26
Ordinance approving Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 99-01
IZl
r"
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
April14,1999
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 99-01 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request to amend
the Terra Vista Community Plan to redesignate the land use district for Parcel 1 of
Parcel Map No. 14786, from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to
Elementary School, located at 7889 East Elm Avenue - APN: 1077-042-88.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
Surroundinq Land Use and ZoninG:
North - Single family homes; Low-Medium ResidentiaI (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Terra
Vista Community Plan
South - Vacant land; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Terra Vista
Community Plan
East - Coyote Canyon Elementary School; Elementary School, Terra Vista Community
Plan
West - Vacant land; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Terra Vista
Community Plan
General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
North Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
East Elementary School
West Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
Site Characteristics: The site is improved with a parking lot which is used by the Coyote
Canyon Elementary School.
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The 3.3-acre site has been used for a number of years as a parking lot for Coyote
~3anyon Elementary School (directly to the east). The original Terra Vista Community Plan
designated the site as Low-Medium Residential but the current Plan inadvertently shows the
site as Elementary School. Staff and Lewis Development Co. researched the records and
determined that the land use designation was never applied for nor approved. The property
is being sold to the Central School District for the expansion of classrooms at Coyote Canyon
Elementary.
122.
pLANNiNG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
T. VCPA 99-01 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO.
April 14, 1999
Page 2
B. Consistency with the General Plan: Land use districts are designated by the General Plan
on a general scale. It is recognized that parcel-specific district location is established with the
community plan.
C. Land Use Compatibility: The site has been used for a number of years as an elementary
school parking facility with no apparent problems or conflicts.
D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the initial Study was prepared by the applicant. Staff
has completed Pad II, the Environmental Checklist, and determined that the project will not
have a significant impact on the environment. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative
Declaration.
FACTS FOR FINDING:
A. The properb/is suitable for the uses permitted in the land use and Terra Vista Community
Plan designation in terms of access, size, and surrounding land use.
B. The proposed amendment would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the
surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study which
indicates that no significant impacts would be expected as a result of this land use change.
C. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan, the Development Code,
and the Terra Vista Community Plan because of the site's ability to promote the goals and
objectives for the Elementary School District.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached
Resolution, thereby recommending that the City Council issue a Negative Declaration and approve
Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 99-01.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:BLC/jfs
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter dated February 19, 1999
Exhibit "B" - Location Map
Exhibit "C" - Terra Vista Community Plan Land Use Map
Exhibit "D" - Initial Study Part II
Resolution Recommending Approval
K__UFMAN L, BRO,,D
February 19, 199,gc/
Mr. Dan Cole,man
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CalilBmia 91730
PARCEL 1, PARCEL MAP 14786 ZONE CHANGE
TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY
De,at Dall,
Please consider this letter of justification for tile, proposed zone change o fan approximate
3.3 acre parcel in Tetra Vista located West el'the Coyote Canyon Elementary School.
This piece of property is be,ing sold to the Central School District. This site` is zoned
medium density residential per the Tcrra Vista Community Plan. Wc arc prot'~osing to
change this zone designation to elementary school. This site is currently iml'~rovcd with
an asl~halt parking lot and some small landscape arcas that have bccn used by tile Ce,ntral
School District over the last several years. There is no construction proposal with this
application, this is solely a zone change request submitted by the owner of the land,
Lewis Dcvclopmcnt Co.
Please call me at (909) 802-1163 if you have any questions. As always, wc appreciate
your help in handling this application for us.
Sincerely,
KAUFMAN AND BROAD OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
PP, L:cmb\013
SITE PLAP' ,
TR. NO. 12
SITE
IS'F. SCHOOL'
PARKING LOT,
EXIST.
COYOTE CANYON
SCHOOL
Pc~r k~
..~._.j ~
, I,?,5 -
Future
R M. 11287
0
\TR. NO. 13717
.,,
Future Multi Fomily
{1[ 'BAY HBISBHOOHII[
0
i.
IlL ~ ,
<D
(J
o
~: 0 o
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND'
1. Project File: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 99-01
2. Related Files:
Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A
request to amend the Terra Vista Community Plan to redesignate the land use district for
Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 14786 from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
to Elementary School, located at 7889 East Elm Avenue - APN: 1077-042-88.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Lewis Development Company
801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Pomona, CA 91768
(909) 802-1163
5. General Plan Designation: Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
6. Zoning: Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Terra Vista Community Plan
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: There are existing single family homes to the
north, an existing elementary school to the east for which the subject site is used as
parking, and vacant land to the south and west, across Elm Avenue.
Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Brent Le Count
(909) 477-2750
10. Other agencies whose approval is required:
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TVCPA 99-01 - Lewis Dev. Co. Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
( ) Land Use and Planning
( ) Population and Housing
(,/) Geological Problems
( ) Water
( ) Air Quality
(/) Transportation/Circulation
( ) Biological Resources
( ) Energy and Mineral Resources
( ) Hazards
( ) Noise
( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
( ) Public Services
( ) Utilities and Service Systems
( ) Aesthetics
( ) Cultural Resources
( ) Recreation
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
(,/)
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
()
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
()
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
()
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
()
Signed:
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
1 ) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier El R pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Brent Le Count, Associate Planner
March 23, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TVCPA 99-01 - Lewis Dev. Co. Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal.'
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the
project?
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community?
( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
CO~11meRtS;
The proposed amendment is necessary to clarify the official City record relative to the zoning
of the subject property which is currently shown on the Terra Vista Community Plan Land Use
Map as Elementary School. The site has been used as a parking lot for the adjacent
elementary school for a number of years without conflict.
POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal.'
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( )
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped
area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( )
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( )
)
) (v,)
) (,/)
initial Study for
TVCPA 99-01 - Lewis Dev. Co.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 4
GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture?
b) Seismic ground shaking?
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d) Seiche hazards?
e) Landslides or mudflows?
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land?
h) Expansive soils?
i) Unique geologic or physical features?
() () ()
() ()
() ()
() () (z)
() () (~)
() ()
() ()
() () (/) ()
() () ()
Comments:
h)
The site is indicated to have Tujunga Delhi soil association per the General Plan which,
"may have soil bearing capacities that could limit some development." This would not
limit the current use of the site as a parking lot. If the site were ever redeveloped, a
soils report would be necessary to ascertain soil bearing capacity and identify
mitigation. The impact is not considered significant.
WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface water runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved
oxygen, or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements?
()
()
() ()
() () , (~)
() () (~)
() ()
() ()
Initial Study for
TVCPA 99-01 - Lewis Dev. Co.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 5
f)
g)
h)
i)
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability?
Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
Impacts to groundwater quality?
Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies?
Potentially
Significant
Irnoact
No
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) (~')
( ) ( )
() ()
ColTlrTlertts;
Whether the site is developed under the current Medium Residential land use district or
Elementary School designation, increased hardscape will occur that will increase runoff.
Furthermore, the site is already developed as a parking lot with drainage conveyed to existing
facilities designed to handle the flows.
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate?
d) Create objectionable odors?
()
)
(/)
(,/)
(/)
Issues and SupOoding InlorrnetiQ~ SOurces;
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Wouldtheproposal
result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
Potentially
Significant
Im0ad Less
PotentiallyUnless Than
( ) ( ) (,/) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TVCPA 99-01 - Lewis Dev. Co. Page 6
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
a) Access to the subject property is located on East Elm Avenue; therefore, no traffic
impacts to the surrounding residential neighborhood are anticipated.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in
impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (incIuding, but not limited to: plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees,
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal
poo~)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
initial Study for
TVCPA 99-01 - Lewis Dev. Co.
ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
proposal.'
a)
b)
c)
Would the
Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner?
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region
and the residents of the State?
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 7
( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
() () () (/)
HAZARDS, Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil,
pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( )
b) Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( )
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard? ( )
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? ( )
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with fiammable brush,
grass, or trees? ( )
() ()
() () (/)
() () (/)
() ()
() () (/)
10.
NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
No
() () () (/)
() () () (/)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TVCPA 99-01 - Lewis Dev. Co. Page 8
11.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the fo~owing areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (7)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
12.
UTILITIESANDSERVICESYSTEMS. Would the proposal
result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
13.
AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TVCPA 99-01 - Lewis Dev. Co. Page 9
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal.'
'a) Disturb paleontological resources?
b) Disturb archaeological resources?
c) Affect historical or cultural resources?
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Potentially
S~gnificant
Impact Less
Potentially Unless Than
Significant Mitigation Significant NO
() ()
() ()
() ()
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) (,/)
15.
RECREATION. Would the proposal.'
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
( ) ( ) ( )
16.
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the
potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal, or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
() (
() (/)
( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TVCPA 99-01 - Lewis Dev. Co. Page 10
Issues and Suppo~lg Infoffnation Sources:
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.)
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have
environmental effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
() () ()
( ) ( ) ( )
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following
earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(,/) General Plan EIR
(Certified April 6, 1981)
(v') Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
(,/) Terra Vista Planned Community EIR
(SCH #81082808, certified February 16, 1983)
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the project could be required to return to the Review
Committee for approval.
Mr. Buller responded that could be done or the Commission could pos
applicant to show a good faith effort at this time.
Commissioner Macias summarized that the resolution, as writ
through the Design Review process at staff's discretior
supported a similar'time extension with the provision tha
Review Committee. He stated the community had ra
he had also been concerned that such a long
happening. He concurred with Chairman McN
Chairman McNiel recalled that the City
alive.
action and ask the
lows the item to be processed
recalled that he had recently
returned for review by the Design
regarding the other project but
elapsed since approval with nothing
~cerns but felt it may also be a policy issue.
~y extended the time limits for project to be kept
Mr. Buller confirmed that the
maximum allowed by state
time extensions.
Council had elected to allow projects to be extended to the
~e observed the Commission is under no obligation to approve
Commissioner Mar felt each project must be looked at individually. He said he had been
under the assur project would have to go back through design review. He reiterated
his motion a negative declaration and adopt the resolution approving Time Extension for
Tentative 14055 with modification to require that the design be subject to approval by the
Desigr ,iew Committee. Motion seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy. Motion carried by the
vote:
MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carried
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT
99-01 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request to amend the Terra Vista Community
Plan to redesignate the land use district for Parcel I of Parcel Map No. 14786 from Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Elementary School, located at 7889 East Elm
Avenue - APN: 1077- 421-88.
Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Pat Loy, Lewis Development Co., 801 Corporate Center Drive, #210, Pomona. stated he was
available to answer questions. He thanked staff for its quick processing of the project.
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing.
Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Macias, to recommend issuance of a Negative
Declaration and adopt the resolution recommending approval of Terra Vista Community Plan
Amendment 99-01. Motion carried by the following vote:
Planning Commission Minutes
-3- April 14, 1999
7
AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carried
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15282 - SILVERADO
GROUP, LLC - A subdivision of 5.0 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Industrial Park Dirt ;dr
(Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the south side of ".aothill
Boulevard, east of Aspen Avenue - APN: 208-352-82.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, presented the staff repod.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Jens Thielmann, Thielmann Engineers, 1078 Town and Country Roa, , Orange,
agreed to the conditions.
indicated they
Headng no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the hear' ~g.
Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Tolstoy, to adorL Lhe resolution approving Parcel Map
15282. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEW'j~T, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE o carried
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN'I:.--,ND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMEN DMENT 98-02
- WILLIAM LYON HOMES - A r~-4uest to amend the Victoria Community Plan to reduce the
Village Commercial land area ,om approximately 23 acres to 16 acres, and to redesignate
approximately 16 acres of I .nd from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to
Low-Medium Residential ' ,-8 dwelling units per acre) on a project site consisting of 62.3
acres of land, located srjthwest of Highland Avenue and the future Day Creek Boulevard -
APN: 227-021-03 an,' ~3.
ENVIRONMENTA'. ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15871 - WILLIAM
LYON HOMES the proposed subdivision and design review of detailed site plan and
elevations for .61 single family lots on 62.3 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential
District (4-8 · welling units per acre) of the Victoria Community Plan, located southwest of
Highland ,^ enue and the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-021-03 and 13.
Rebecca V-, ~ Buren, Associate Planner, presented the staff repod and suggested a change to
the resold, '.~n to require that the developer submit a revised Victoria Community Plan incorporating
the cha, ges made to the graphics and text made by this amendment. She asked for Commission
directi n regarding undergrounding.
Ct" ,irman McNiel asked how much area will not be undergrounded if the undergrounding is per
t'.e resolution as proposed.
Planning Commission Minutes
-4- April 14, 1999
City Council Minutes
June 2,1999
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 99-119
a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIF
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
D14. Approval to accept Improvements. release the Faithful Pe
Bond, and file a "Notice of Completion" for improvements for Tract 1441
Nevada General pafinership.
.IF WORK
pt a Maintenance
by Centex Homes, a
Release:
Accept:
FaithfuiPerformance Bond
#111 2732 4140
Maintenance Bond
#1111 2732 4140
$ 25,600.00
RESC NO. 99-120
A RESOLUTION OF
CU
TRACT 14410
COMPLETIC
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
-IF WORK
MOTION: Moved by E
contained in the
seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports
;alend~r. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
;ubmitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
F1. CONSIDERATiONOFENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTANDTERRAVISTACOMMUNITYPLAN
AMENDMENT 99-01 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request to amend the Terra Vista
Community Plan to redesignate the land use district for Parcel 1 or Parcel Map No. 14786, from Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Elementary School, located at 7889 East Elm Avenue - APN:
1077-042-88.
Staff report presented by Brent LeCount, Associate Planner.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response. the public hearing was
closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-121
a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 99-01, AMENDING THE TERRAVISTA COMMUNITY PLAN LAND
USE MAP TO REDESIGNATE THE LAND USE DISTRICT FOR PARCEL 1 OF
City Council Minutes
June 2,1999
Page 5
PARCEL MAP 14786 FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 TO 14 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) TO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, LOCATED AT 7889 EAST ELM
AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 1077-042-88
MOTION: Moved by Willlares, seconded by Dutton to approve Resolution No. 99-121. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
F2. CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - CATELLUS - A
request to amend the Industrial Area Specific Plan definition of "Specialty Building Supplies and Home
Improvements" to conditionally permit buildings over 25,000 square feet.
Staff report presented by Brent LeCount, Associate Planner.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was:
Pam Steel, Castellus & Lowes, stated they agree and support staffs recommend~
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-122
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ApPROVING II
AMENDMENT 99-01, AMENDING THE IF
DEFINITION OF SPECIALTY BUILDING
IMPROVEMENTS TO CONDITIONALLY PERN
SQUARE FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
OF RANCHO
PECIFIC PLAN
SPECIFIC PLAN
IPPLIES AND HOME
JILDINGS OVER 25,000
}ORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to ~
unanimously, 5-0.
Resolution No. 99-122. Motion carried
G. ; HEARINGS
No Items Submitted.
H. GER'S STAFF REPORTS
CONSIDERATION Q A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK' AND RECREATION
CH~MMISSfON FOR A PROFilED EXPANDED CUSTOMER SERVICE PROGRAM AT CITY FACILITIES
AND IMPLEMENTATION .~F PICNIC AREA RENTAL FEE POLICY
Staff report presented '~Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director.
Councilmember ~ asked if the staff that work would have flexible work schedules.
eZ,o..McAr : ;ie. "rvices'Direct°r's'a'ed'heYw°uldhave"exib'eschedu'esdePendi"g°nwha'
RESOLUTION NO. 99-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, A REQUEST
TO CHANGE THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP
FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FOR 3.3 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF EAST ELM AVENUE, WEST OF COYOTE CANYON
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BETVVEEN SPRUCE AVENUE AND CHURCH
STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
APN: 1077-042-88.
A. Recitals.
1. Lewis Development Company has tiled an application for Tetra Vista Community Plan
Amendment No. 99-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafier in this Resolution,
the subject Tetra Vista Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On April 14, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public headng, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony,
this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 3.3 acres,
basically a triangular configuration, located on the north side of Elm Avenue between Spruce
Avenue and Church Street, and which is presently improved with a parking lot for Coyote Canyon
Elementary School. Access is located on East Elm Avenue. Said property is currently designated
as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and
b. All of the surrounding properties are within the Terra Vista Planned Community.
The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) and is improved with single family homes. The properties to the west and south
(on the south side of Elm Avenue) are designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre) and are currently vacant. The property to the east is designated Elementary School and is
developed with the Coyote Canyon Elementary School; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-26
TVCPA 99-01 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Apdl 14, 1999
Page 2
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan,
the Terra Vista Community Plan, and with related development; and
d, This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the General Plan Land
Use Element and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district
in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all wdtten and oral repods included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative
Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore
reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations. the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration,
the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Plannin9 Commission dudng the
public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
//-/Z.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-26
TVCPA 99-01-LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Apd114,1999
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment
No. 99-01 to change the Land Use Map for the subject properly to Elementa,'7 School, as shown
on the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 1999.
2NNINGCOMMI SION OF T~I~~~F RANCHO CUCAMONGA
'~hairman t
A'I'I'EST: ~ J /" Bra,
I, Brad Buller, Secretary for the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of April 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NACiAS, HANNERiN0, F1CNZEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, AMENDING THE TERRA
VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP TO REDESIGNATE THE
LAND USE DISTRICT FOR PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 14786 FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 TO 14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, LOCATED AT 7889 EAST ELM AVENUE
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 1077-042-88
A Recitals.
1. Lewis Homes has filed an application for Terra Vista Ccmmunity Plan Amendment 99-01
as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereina~er in this Ordinance, the Terra Vista Community
Plan Amendment is referred to as the "application."
2. On the 14th of April, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City ofRancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said
public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 99-26 thereby recommending to this City Council that said
application be approved.
3. On April 5, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said public hearing,
adopted Resolution No. 99-121.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
"A," of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 5, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan;
and
b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and
the Terra Vista Community Plan; and
c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
d. This amendment is identical to that previously approved by City Council
Resolution No. 99-121.
CiTY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
TVCPA 99-01 - LEWIS HOMES
April 5, 2000
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on April 5, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and
considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this
Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 99-01, to redesignate the
land use district of Parcel I of Parcel Map 14786 from Medium Residential (8 to 14 dwelling units
per acre) to Elementary School as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" as well as any related text,
tables, figures, and maps to maintain consistency.:
M
LM
//
M LM
M ~,
LM
OP
CC
FIGURE fi1-17
Land Use Plan
IlL
M
MFC
NC
LM
LM
CC
RESIDENTIAL
coMMEBDJAL
MIXED USE
PUBLIC & QUASI-PUBLI..__.____~C
0t',_"~ t'
~= ~ ~ w GRUEN ASSOCIATES
Density Ranges of Approved Projects may van/slightly from the Plan;
See "As Built Land Use Progress Plan" - Figure VI-3 on page Vl-11.
REVISED Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 & 9
111-23
M
LM
M
LM
LM
" OP
FIGURE 111-17
Land Use Plan
ill
NC
MHO
M L~'~/i
LM
LM
CC
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
MIXED USE
PUBLIC & QUASI-PUBLIC
,e zm ~e · GRUEN ASSOCIATES
Density Ranges of Approved Projects may vary slightly from the Plan;.
See 'As Built Land Use Progress Plan" - Figure VI-3 on page VF11.
REVISED Amendment NOS. 1, 2, 5, 6. 7 & 9
111-23
T H E CITY OF
I~ANCIIO CUCAI~IONGA
StllffReport
DATE: April 5, 2000
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Brad Buller, City Planner
BY:
SUBJECT:
Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION POLICY
WAIVER - BADDER - A request to waive the Planning Commission design
policy requiring the use of tile roofing material, and proposing composition
shake instead. for a new home located at 10336 Hidden Farm Road - APN:
1074-121-07
BACKGROUND: Charles Badder is in the process of constructing a single family home at
10336 Hidden Farm Road. The site is in a hillside area; therefore, the design of the home
was subject to the hillside Development Review process. The approved plans specified
"Monier Life Tile" roofing but during construction, Mr. Badder chose to switch to composition
shingle roofing. Use of composition shingle roofing is not consistent with Planning
Commission design policy for new single family home construction and was not approved
with the issuance of the building permit. A correction notice was issued and the matter was
brought before the Planning Commission for resolution. The Planning Commission
considered the requested policy waiver at its meeting of March 8, 2000, and denied the
waiver. The denial was appealed in a timely manner to the City Council.
ANALYSIS: Since the late1980s, the Planning Commission has consistently upheld a
residential design policy to require tile roof material of a high quality appearance for new
construction. The policy is reflected in every planning document adopted since 1987. such
as the architectural guidelines of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and Etiwanda North
Specific Plan, which requires tile roofing. This policy has also been documented in staff
memorandums. Composition shingles have traditionally not been permitted for new
construction per this policy. All of the surrounding homes in the neighborhood have either
flat concrete tile or mission tile (predominantly flat concrete tile) consistent with the policy.
Composition shake would be inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood. On very rare
occasions, the Planning Commission has allowed a thick-butt architectural composition
shake roof material when deemed appropriate to the architectural style of the home, such as
a Victorian theme.
For detailed background and analysis, please refer to the attached Planning Commission
Staff Report dated March 8, 2000.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DR 99-30 POLICY WAIVER - BADDER
April 5, 2000
Page 2
At the Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Badder stated that the composition shingle
roofing has superior wind and fire resistance. Since the Planning Commission meeting, Mr.
Badder has submitted additional information on roof tile specifications. See the attached
letter of March 19, 2000.
NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNS: Staff received a phone call from a Mr. and Mrs. Hell who
own the neighboring property to the north. They expressed concern that their home was
required to have tile roofing per the hillside review process and that it would not be fair to
allow Mr. Badder's roofing to be composition shingle. No other correspondence has been
received from the neighbors.
City Planner
BB:BLC/Is
Attachments:
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
- Letter from Charles Badder dated March 19, 2000
- Planning Commission .Staff Report dated March 8, 2000
- Planning Commission Minutes dated March 8, 2000
March 19, 2000
City ofRancho Cucamonga City Council
C/O Bill Alexander, Diane Willjams, James V. Curatalo, Paul Biane, Bob Dutton
Subject: Roofing material on new construction at 10336 Hidden Farm Rd. in Alta Loma
Dear Members of City Council,
It has been brought to our attention that there has been a STOP WORK
NOTICE put on our project located a 10336 Hidden Farm Rd. The reason for this is that
we have installed composition roofing material instead oftBe. Although tile has been
approved on the original drawings we felt that Celotex Presidential composition st~le
~hake roof would be a better choice. The reasons for our decision are as follows:
STYLE:
We feel that a composition roof is the most aesthetically pleasing to the traditional
eastern architecture of the home.. We have chosen- a material that has the most dimension
available. Because of this dimension it's presentation is closest to tile while still achieving
the style we are looking for.
EFFICIENCY & SAFETY
Celotex Presidential Shake composition material gives a better construction that
will withstand the ravages of inclement weather which is often experienced in this area.
The tightness of this material and manner of which it is applied will withstand higher
winds, promote increased energy efficiency, and deflects rain and moisture better than tile.
We feel tile represents an increased liability because of its inability to seal as well as this
composition roof.
As an experienced Los Angeles County firefighter for the past 22 years, now
holding the position of Captain, I have personally experienced the dangers of tile in a
wind-driven fire. In such conditions the tile will be lit~ed allowing embers to get
underneath the air pockets and start a roof fire. I have witnessed this in Oakland,
Lagtma, and in Malibu. With this composition roofI feel that this liability is diminished.
In talking to other firefighters living in Alta Loma, they have conveyed the .same feelings
and would prefer this composition roof over tile.
With the winds that are often present in Alta Loma, it is a fact that tiles are lost.
This creates the unfortunate task of replacing tiles which results in an unsightly roof
because they do not match due to weather fading and availability. We have even heard of
people having to reidlace their entire roof due to thig situation- The Celotex Presidential
Shake will withstand hurricane force winds up to 150mph and is guaranteed up to 85
MPH. The Monier Lifetile that is approved in our plans will generally withstand winds up
to 60 MPH (refer to letter from Hoyt Roofs It Right addition 3) By using this composition
shake we will diminish the possibility of tile coming off in high winds and eliminate an
unfortunate ~that could create personal or property damage.
FOUNDATION SETTLEMENT:
The subject of settlement has been brought to our attention by Building & Safety.
It has been stated that the tile roof is necessary to accomplish the proper settlement of the
house. As per Roger Shervington state #GE768, registered professional soils engineer,
"Dense, gravelly sand will not settle significantly. Boulders don't settle. Changes of roof
material will not significantly effect structural settlement on this soil."
LEGALITY:
As per Alan Smith of Southwest Design Group and our general contractor, Bob
Sherwood of Cornerstone Creations, License #726222, there is no ordinance in the
building code nor any binding written resolution that states tile roof is required or that this
composition roof is not allowed. During the designing phase we had decided that the
Mouler LifetHe was the roof of choice and that the exact style and color would be decided
later (per approved plans page 11). During this process we were introduced to the Celotex
Presidential Shake roof and found that it had properties that were equal to and if not
better than the Monier Lifetile ( see additions 2,3and 4 attached). Although our roof has
been engineered not to exceed 101bs per square foot we felt that the Celotex roof(51bs per
square foot) would allow for a roof of lesser weight to be strueturally safe and compatible
with our architectural style. There is no structural reason for a tile roof to be required (for
soil, foundation, framing, or any other reason).
When we decided to put the Celotex roof on we were truly unaware that we had
to re-submit to the Planning Dept. for approval It was and still is our intent to create a
house that is aesthetically pleasing and structuraily sound and complies with city
ordinances, unaware that there was a direolive in place for tile only.
We would like to conclude this letter by stating our reasons for choosing Alta
Loma to raise our family and later retire. This home has been three years in design and 17
years in the planning. It is our dream home! We have chosen Alia Loma for its
distinguished school district, close proximity to church and friends, future civic planning,
and breathtaking view of surroundings. We feel that this home is an example of good
architecture and will be a positive contribution to the neighborhood and to the city of Alia
Loma.
(714)834-0060
Please see attached information ~om roofing company.
C ortxerstoo Creations-'
March 2, 2000
Charlie & Jem~y Badder
1015 W. Orange Road
Santa Ana, CA 92706
Dear Charlie & Jenny:
I spent a couple of hours today driving up and down the streets of Rancho
Cncamonga/Alta Loma looking for houses with wood antVox composition tootint3.
H.ere's what I've found:
There's a very small section of Rancho Cucamonga/Alta Loma that is actually
ALL TILE. ~verything North of Orange Vista, and East of Haven in the Deer
Creek Development is all tile.
Below Orange Vista, beginning at tlillside Avenue, there is a combination of wood
shake and composition shingle, with the exception of a few 10-year old
developments with tile roofs.
Above Hidden Farm Road there are only a few houses built. There is a mine,'
percentage of Rancho Cucamonga/Alta Loma from that point North into the
foothills left to develop.
My thoughts are these:
Roughly 85% of Rancho Cucan~onga and Rancho Cucamonga/AIta Loma have
mixed roofing (i.e. Wood Shake, Composition Shingle. vj~d Tile).
Another 10%, located in Raneho Cueamong-qAlta Loma is all new constn~ctiot:
(probably no more than 5-7 years old) and is all tile.
COR.,'~',.R$'TONE CRF.4TIO/VS-}S70-A J/awardAcctv:t R,~d- Ut'tan~ CA 91786-~09) 981-9266-C~O0) ~,'t1-9156 I"av
/5.2.
:. The final 5% has not be, exx developed yet.
,
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga is worried abottt uniformity and appearat:ce,
lhey can only xvorry about the northern 15% of tile area; it's already too late for tt~e
first 85%. Homes in the foothills will be too expensive for the average person and
traffic will be minor. Any noticeable differences beb,veen the 85% and the !5%
can only be seen from the air.
I've generated a (very) rough map depicting the areas I've mentioned above.
Here is a list of houses I checked out today:
10244 Hillside
'10384 Hillside
10376 Hillside
10186 Wilson
10359 Ridgeview
Wood Shake Garage attached to a Composition House
New Composition Roof (Recent Replacement)
Wood Shake
Composition Shingle
Could be Shake-type Tile, but looks more like wood shake than
the other shake-type tile roofs on the street.
95% of the houses located on Hermosa Average are Wood Shake or Composition
Shingle roofs.
;Almost every tile roof on Banyan Avenue contains nfis-nmtched or discotoreci
tiles- It looks like replacement tiles have not been easy to ~natch and th::
discoloration appears due to oxidation and sun-b"'~king. (A sign in the ~ea says
these are Steven Walker homes and are advertised in the "New Home Guide"
picked up several new home magazines, but not this one.
Please keep in mind, i'm no expert and the area map ~s just a rough illustratio~
based on what I saw. As always, call me if you need anything.
Smcerely,
l,inda L. Hall
Enclosures
COPd'.,'EJ~TON'F.. CRF..IITON. q- IS70-A Iltm'atd,,tcc'i~'c Read-Uptan.~ CA 91786-0I09) 981-9266-(~09) 981-9156 I'i~r
IIII | BID'L AV['I'IUC ~ ':~
I ALTA LOMA.
Z
8A~Et, INE ROAD
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FOOTHILl- BLVD.
Tile Areas
IWood Shake, Comp, and Tile Mix J
JFuture DeveJopme. f!t
FIF. LD ~ F.~S'rENI~G
Tdr. iasienin8 iecr.~erne~S d~end upon loof pi~ch, dec.ki~ and
e~x,~ure ta ~,i~s wi~d s~ee~. Where ~d ~e na~ ~ ~.
box ~ ~d sb~ ~e~e ~/C ~iO ~od~ bEa s~ps or
my be used u an opdon v/nene,'cr rods are recNked. (Se-: i'? '.'!
overhang areis '~'ithouc solits. to ::,told visible nail
duri=g direct deck lpplicalioo. %" ~ may be ~stalled as a b~uee,,
fsseened u~ each rafter to provide adequate thlchless for %'
pene~rllinu ~id~oui pcotn~sion.
T.~E 2 - FoR Wn~D SPEEDS Up TO x~D IN'CL~n~G 80 MPH
FIELD TILE NAILING'
Roof Pitch~ Solid Shead~qg Solid Shea'jd. ng Pez~meter Tile tnd
~dth Battens without Batlens Tile on Cantilevered
3 12 ~o less th~ ~: 12 Not requ/red Ever)' ~e EX'ery die
~:12 [o less tha 12:12 Eveq,' til~, every ocher row EXert' de Ever/file ......
I 't: 12 ~d Over EYer/iile E,try tile Every ~ile
NO~: Slopes over 24:t2, nose elds of all c~u mus{ be securely bs,med.
'31i Uthr,'elglu tile: musl be fn.~ned at all pi '~.es, s perime~' ~ng ~eis btclude duee nl¢ courses but n0¢ !e~ t~,an 36"
with or withoul billurns. ~om e~ec side of hips or ri~es a.~c! ~ of em,'es aad ~,d~le rah:s.
' For too{ pitches above 7: I 2 habeas
~' :,:;,: '5"' """':'~' '.Y~.7.'.?~'::, '~:'. 7'..-~~
": · ,:":'~ ....... ~'~.'.' . "..'.:¥' ~':' ......... "'7:" :'.' ':" :,' "': . · .,~.
f:. '.;.... .: ... : ..~
p......':::~."':':'~ ':."" 'V::'~"" :": ':""7. '.;::'h:.':.:""'~:.''' ~':'~ .........: ' ~"' :' ......'
"lililllilllillieiillilllillBiililllll .-_,
"' 'lllll!l.q!lll!llllli!lllllll!lllllB -...,,
'.' IllIll,~ ~IIBIIIIIB!IIIBBIBIIB!I!II -
· " IIII" ,~IIIIIII!IIIIIBBIIIIIIBII ·
· II1! ~lllllll!lllllllllllllll
; 'l_lg?'
E mlllll!i!l!llllll BIll
i .' ,uussssssssssslumm
mmm :mmm ............... ':"
smm
IIII.
.11111
Ililp
IllIf'.
I1"
'NIl
mil'
· :NIl
NIl
.NIl '
.~lml
'~.~
-Ilk
page ;,: ,'~ ',;[ 0~ ONIE
---'7
= Per[ae:er ,L,'~
NOTE:
pug ~
For {)eclcLil~~ fa~tening requirementS ~ c 4~
· For CedaxljCe~ fastening reqah~raents s~t: pa....,: ~':
199!E. qlLZ._::q :{31!F.¢C N:':';a:6 ~°""e"l~ '~ 'Jet;
..',, ~x,,'As df~lgr.~ted b.,' local building dei~:tnments as b~in~
:~,lec'. ia t~i)eated. ~md vetocities in excess of 80 ~ph or where
r,, :.~ ~e ~; exceeds 40' above grad~. WI ttt~s shall be a~ched in
accor~ce ~th building codes or ss set for. h In
Tab!es 5, 4and 5-
8O
Hawaii
30 110
O0
~°'~111 eas~c wln~ s~)'
~ 80 mph
Ff'ffq 90 mph
~ 100 [Oph
~ llOmpn
~ 120 mph
110
1. Values are fastest S~eds at ~5 feet (10 m) abo~'e gro~r.d.
2 L~ctear Lnterpo!ation between ~'t~d s.~eed conto',~s is ~ceptz, ble.
.~,. C~uuon i.a use of wL'~d speed contours in raou.',u~.cus reg~o-".s of .Maska is advised.
.~. Wind speed fo: I.{awaii is 80 mph and l>uetlo Rico is 95 mph. .
.L ;~lxez¢: local recor~ or ternin indicate higher 50-year ',,.'hid speeds, re hiker ,,peeds shall be used·
· - - · t con:o.,tr,
% Wbd speed ma.v be :~'ts. med to be coaster behveen the co.~c and '.he ae'~ est t:'~.~,~d
'-' ': '~L:: '2.." ', Strong and reliable. Pres dent a Shake~'M is one of "The Very Best~
.... ' unique tob de~n, Presidential Shake lectures our p~xented.
~::. '- . .. :..- . ..' , .
: ' i:':' "' t~' " , ' ' ':: :' ~: "' -in rest are~ '~e~iaen~l S~ke i~available ~h add~ prot~ion
': :': ,. '2 Shakele~res~ Algae'Block~" Cop~r Roofin9 Granule
.. -: ... -... ::: gem, ie~ and tree t~hnology available. The Celotex
Z ...... ' ',:... . .-.~ 6f-;~'p d pro~aly displays the Good Housek--pin9
· · .... f Pr~ident~l Shake
. -, . ,':z . : , '~ .....
RANClIO CUCAMONGA
St/fffReport
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 8, 2000
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Brent Le Count AICP, Associate Planner
POLICY WAIVER - BADDER - A request to waive the Planning Commission
design policy requiring the use of tile roofing material, and proposing composition
shake instead, for a new home located at 10336 Hidden Farm Road -
APN: 1074-121-07.
BACKGROUND: The house was originally submitted for plan check in May 1999 through the
Building & Safety Division. The Planning Division issued corrections which indicated that the
house is located in a hillside area; hence, a Design Review application was required. The
application was filed on June 17, 1999, and approved by the City Planner on August 16, 1999.
The conditions of approval require the project to be built in accordance with the approved plans,
including exterior colors and materials. The approved plans specified a "Monier Lifetile" roof
material. The two-story house design features traditional architectural style with horizontal
Masonite siding wrapping the entire house, wood trim, decorative shutters and vents, and a
masonary veneer for accent on the front elevation. The one-story detached garage design
matches the main residence.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga issued a building permit to construct a new single-family home
at 10336 Hidden Farm Road on September 23, 1999. The construction plans specified "Monier
Lifetile" for the roofing, and the house is structuraHy engineered to handle the weight of a tile
roof (which is heavier than composition). On February 15, 2000, a Correction Notice was
issued by the Building and Safety Division inspector because composition roof shingles had
been installed instead of the Monier Lifetile. The roofing appears to be complete. On February
24, 2000, the contractor for the project met with staff to discuss the matter. The contractor
stated that the homeowners had decided to change the roof material from Monier Lifetile to the
composition shingle due to lower cost and better wind protection considerations. The contractor
and homeowners were unaware of the Planning Commission design policy precluding
composition shingle roofing and did not process a change order request through the City.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
POLICY WAIVER - BADDER
March 8, 2000
Page 2
ANALYSIS: Since 1987, the Planning Commission has consistently upheld a residential design
policy to require tile roof material of a high quality appearance for new construction. The policy
is reflected in every planning document adopted since 1987, such as the architectural guidelines
of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and Etiwanda North Specific Plan, which requires tile
roofing. This policy has been documented in staff memorandums. Composition shingles have
traditionally not been permitted per this policy. All of the surrounding homes in the
neighborhood have either flat concrete tile or mission tile (predominantly flat concrete tile)
consistent with the policy. Composition shake would be inconsistent with the surrounding
neighborhood. On very rare occasions, the Planning Commission has allowed a thick°butt
architectural composition shake roof material when deemed appropriate to the architectural
style of the home, such as a Victorian theme.
The attached letter from the homeowners indicates that their reasons for preferring composition
shake are due to appearance and wind resistance. Their roofing supplier states that the
composition shake has a wind rating of 85 mph versus 60 mph for tile roofing; however, no
manufacturer data was submitted to substantiate these figures.
The house framing was engineered for the heavier weight of tile roofing. In construction
parlance, the roof must be "loaded" with the weight of the tiles in order to properly inspect the
framing. Typically, the tiles are stacked on the roof decking which allows the framing to adjust to
the weight. According to Carlos Silva, Senior Building Inspector, their Correction Notice
prevents any further construction, such as insulation or drywall, which would cover up framing
and prevent proper inspection. The homeowners' engineer has discussed this with Mr. Silva
and understands the need to resolve the tile roof issue before proceeding with further
construction; however, the homeowners do not want to be delayed. If the Planning Commission
allows the composition shake to remain, construction may proceed.
ACTION REQUESTED: The homeowners request that the Planning Commission waive their
policy requiring tile and allow the composition shake.
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:BLC\ma
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Homeowners' Letter
Exhibit "B" - Correction Notice
Exhibit "C" - Composition Shake Roofing Manufacturers Specifications
Exhibit "D" - Location Map
Exhibit "E" - Roof Plan
Exhibit "F" - Elevations
83/81/2888 02:15 7148348850 5~DDER PAGE 82
City of Ra~ho
C~O Btm L~C~
Da~ Mcmtzm ofp~,~,,i~_ C~-~,~nn,
82:15 7148346866 BADDER PAGE 63
FOU~DKrlON 8~,~TTLEM~'~NT;
It ~been s~a~ed thM fi3e ~le roof is nec____,~sery to eex, omplish l~ ~ settl6nm dthc
· Den~ 81'avetly mind wffi nor seele.signifi:mly. Boulden eb~,'t .sW&. C,!~_ of roof
L~GALrrY:
As per our erchi~,unl de~ner, AlmSmlthofSo~,hwes~I:~sign6roupaadour
gen~d contrsctor, Bob Sherwood of Comermine Cregions, Licensct726222, there is
~cnEinecrcd nottoc~ae~dlOl~.persqu~efoot:ailo~agfaramofofles~rwe~httobc
y~arsi~heplem~g. hiso~drumhomc! WchavcchoscnAltaLomaforits
nrchi~ccturenndwiUbcal~sitivccotmOx~ontothenelghix>tboodan~o.ttccilYofAttn
8,,_,t_..,ciTY oF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
To: ~7'L2,~J,~_
CORRECTION NOTICE
/d,.fn-~.,:.f ,;Z>.Lz ,
( '4
Inspector"s
Office Hours
8:00 to 9:00 a.m.
(714) 989-1863
~AMERICANBUBINE88FORMS (714)7~3-5233
RESIDENTIAL FIRt::
HYDRO:
FLOW TEST:
FINAL:
INSPECTION
DA~E
INSP. SIGN
Z
~3/01/2088 82:15 7148348868 BADDEER PAGE 84
9899819[56
HoytRoofs It Right
740 S. Van Buren St., []nit
Bl. acen~ia, CA9267Q
Ja~acy 6, 2000
t.lt~da Hall
Cornerstonc Creations
1570-A Howard Access Road
Upland, CA 91786
p,~fQuote, Project #99-119
10336 Hidden Farm Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917~ 0
De~r Linda:
At1~hed is the quote you requested for the roof at the abov~ job. I will also attempt to
answer some of th~ questions posed by Cornerstone and the homeowners to help in
m~.king a choice on lhe type of roof best s~ited to the
, The wind rating of the C~lote~ Presidential Cla.s~ A
generally rated up Io 60 mph. Recenl reports rated wind ~eWcity at 75 mph in the
area. (See litached Celotex residential roofing technical bulletin containing
information on special thermal ~aling tab adhesive bonding for wind resistance.)
· Mo~iet Liratile, a~ ~4,th any oth. er tile, will be dit~.~ult to color-match due to weather
conditions and oxidation. Yes, you c~ keep a pallet of tile i~ the garage, but it will
~ill age differently since it won'l be exposed tO sunlight as the roof will be.
· presidential weighs approximately 4# pet square foot, where tl~ Lifelile weighs
app~oximn';~l:~ 9 6S - 10.3~ p~r tiXe.' ~tea.~ note that, if tlxe Lifefile should blow off
during windy conditions, you could b~ liable for damage to pnuing <~'s, people, and
neighbors' windows. Presidential is less likely to c~uae lay but ndnor damage.)
I hope this helps. ffyou have any other questions, please let me know. I look forward
l~atln8 fi'om ,}o,~
,Sin~rely,
Brian itoy~
Ene[os~Lres
License ~606111
Office (714) 632-6636
Fax # (714) 632-6635
PAGE 85
03/6~/2668 6~:~5 7~483488~8
S nNC, Lt'¢
RESIDENWIAL ROOFING
TECHNICAL BULLETIN
Ct
CEI,(II~XCORi~IA1[IO~ · :POBOX,~X~O2 · ,X'AMi,A~fl,OIUIDA :-
(~mrnont arid t~ Angstes production Only) \
F ATTENTION
DIREC~ONS FOR APpUCATIQN
. FOR MANSARD ROOF ~r'L)~IO~E APPLICATION tN~RUC~ONS
Th.6e ahi~l are d~nH (orffie
NDRE!I T~NC .~e~lhlngl~Mta:~MtM~ai~a~emkei~tb~themt~nr~er~u~'
pla~lc or IlUmln~ m~8S0 ~pe on ~t ~ck of ~ 8hln~s pfi0~ ~ ~ ~ o g -
p ese of ~ ta~ I$ le Dinvent s $hle g~$ Nat~Md M $qa~t s~ ~Om Id h~ to ~ ove~ing shingle While
wield Hot to $pp~e~n, ~ AD~Q
ALL P~POBE - For Use ~ n~ at re~g W0~ Mr any ~Hy bu~ ~ ~o~ f~f ~;k ~h ~ . ~.
o~r~rern~ed~m~ 81Q~s~2'(5~mmllnlz'~mm)~4'(qo~ )lnl~( ) '
trate th rough me APA e~ P~ ~ O~s~ ~ ~ (~B) ~k ~ 1 ~' (3 ~) minimum, 1Drive hills
~ ~. ~ not o~ n~ Pm~r n~ng lm snenti~ (See Nillng )nM~}. Foqowlocat Bu ~tng
~gAROAppUCAT)B-Fotm~}ml~f~snl~)mm)~12m)mm}(M~ard)
n~e (9) ni~ ~ =~ (mH ~ng ~{oM). Also. ePp~ oN dab of E~IGU~ R~'afers ~n) ( ~n
t ~ s ~le ~ 8 queer) b~eeth ~h ib ~ n~}r ~e b~, b~ ~l so ~se to ~e ~ t~l it ~ sq~zed fre~ L, nder
P~C C~ME~ · M~ ~fo~ ~ ~M Sp.~i~ti~ ~s~93 T~ II. ~tsx ~mm~s EL~~IJM$
~oof~ O~n~
~s, Nil ~s~ 6" ~
VICINITY MAP
ROOF NOTES
q
~ P,A'/:Vh,,IC~:xV ,/2x6d.'riZlA~ ~
d, LIVI/,/6
*' ~ee, e,c
:soU~H;
~ i~jv,,T e, uevA'no~-J
'T/~
:WEST]"
NORTH
AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carried
NEWBUSINESS
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVF'~ ¢ 99-62 - CAPELLINO AND
ASSOCIATES - The development of three industrial bulldiP. totaling 82,376 square feet on
4.12 acres of land in the General Industrial Distdct (Sub.." ,a 8) of the Industrial Area Spedtic
Plan, located on the south side of Arrow Route, apt- .Ximately 300 feet east of White Oak
Avenue - APN: 209-461-02 and 209-471-03. R~' _~d file: Development Review 99-63.
Rudy Zeledon, Associate Planner, presented th~ ,aft report.
Chairman McNiel invited public comment
Mark Capellino, Capellino and Assr' _ares. 2020 Del Amo Boulevard, #105, Torrance, thanked Mr.
Zeledon for his eftotis on the pr~':.-~,~. He said they have taken great care to be consistent with the
balance of the park.
There were no furlher..~liC comments on this item.
Chairman McNi~.' .,0ted that the project has been on-going for quite a long time and he indicated it
has been a p~ .Sure to work with the applicant.
Motion' ,vloved by Mannerino, seconded by Tolstoy to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the
rest,' don approving Development Review 99-62. Motion carded by the following vote:
.-,YES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carded
POLICY WAIVER - BADDER - A request to waive the Planning Commission design policy
requidng the use of tile roofing material, and proposing composition shake instead, for a new
home located at 10336 Hidden Farm Road APN: 1074-121-07.
Brent Le Count, Associate Planner. presented the staff report.
Chairman McNiel invited public comment.
Chades Badder, 1015 West Orange Place, Santa Ana, presented a letter explaining why they
changed their roof selection to a composition roof.
Chairman McNiel asked for clarification that the structure was designed and constructed to support
a tile roof.
Mr. Badder confirmed that was correct.
Chairman McNiel asked if the general contractor or roofing contractor had not looked at the plans.
Planning Commission Minutes
-5~ March 8, 2000
Mr. Badder indicated he had decided the tile originally spedfled would not go with the architectural
lines of the house. He stated they selected sculptured composition because they had made changes
to the house design and wanted to achieve a V~ctorian style house. He said they did not know there
was a requirement for tile roofs in the City. He thought the composition roof will form a tighter seal
and be more efficient as well as be more wind resistant. He indicated the composition roof cost
$11,000 whereas the tile roof cost $13,000. He expressed appreciation for staffs placing the item
on the Planning Commission agenda so quickly. He felt the house will be an asset to the community.
Commissioner Stewart asked the life on the roof.
Mr. Badder replied it is a 40-year roof. He said the roof requires 15 pound felt and he upgraded to
30 pound. He stated his contractor's secretary had driven around the area and found that 85 percent
of the roofs in Rancho Cucamonga are mixed roofing materials.
Chairman McNiel said he found it unfathomable that the professionals in the business had not
advised Mr. Badder that he had to get the City's approval for changes.
Mr. Badder said he shared Chairman McNiel's frustration.
Alan Smith, Southwest Design, 7201 Haven Avenue, Suite E-309, Rancho Cucamonga, stated Mr.
Badder has tded hard to comply with each and every step. Mr. Smith indicated he has designed
many homes in Rancho Cucamonga but he had always proposed tile roofs; therefore, he was
unaware of the city's policy and had no reason to advise Mr. Badder that he needed a tile roof. He
said it was unfortunate that the roof was already on by the time they found out they must use tile.
He reported this is the first custom home the general contractor has done and said he has done a
fine job.
Commissioner Mannedno asked if Mr. Smith had examined the information from the roofing
manufacturer.
Mr. Smith confirmed he had and said he believes their claims. He stated the composition roofing
selected is thick.
There were no additional public comments at this time.
Chairman McNiel observed the Planning Commission was dealing with a policy issue that requires
new structures be built with tile roofs. He said the policy was adopted because there was greater
success with the tile roofs than with any other roofing material, He noted his neighbors composition
roof sheets constantly blow into his yard. He stated the house is attractive and impressive and
dominates the intersection, He said the roof is not unattractive but there is a policy in effect that the
City has stringently enforced. He observed that all other houses on the immediate street and in the
general area have tile roofs.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated he had gone to see the house and he felt it looks nice and the roof
looks nice. He observed that one of the responsibilities of the Planning Commission is to consider
public health and safety. He noted the tile roofs are required because of fire hazard and said this
house is just south of the brush shed. He said he has had burning embers on his properly several
times. He stated that if there is a fire in the mountains and the wind is blowing, there will be hot
embers blown onto the roof. He reported he had lost a house in a fire recently and he had been
informed the composition roof was fireproof. but it had lost its fireproofing in just 10 years. He felt
it is important to adhere to the tile roof policy.
Commissioner Stewart observed that it has been a policy since 1987 to require tile roofs. She felt
a change in the policy may open the door for other changes. She believed the policy was partially
Planning Commission Minutes
-6- March 8, 2000
for aesthetic reasons and she appreciated the style of the house and the applicant's desire to have
the roof he selected. She favored allowing the roof to remain.
Commissioner Macias observed that he has gone on record in the past in support of upholding
policies. He felt the policy should be upheld and the roof should be replaced.
Commissioner Mannedno felt there is a difference between a policy and a commandment. He
believed the policy was adopted for three reasons: to have roofs which are windproof, fireproof, and
aesthetically pleasing. He stated he looked at the manufacturer's specifications and the composition
roof appears wind resistant, and he thought the roof is acceptable from the standpoint of cosmetics;
however, he did not see anything with respect to its being fireproof. He noted Celotex is a major
manufadurer and 40 years is a long time; however, he said he did not have enough information to
determine if
Chairman McNiel again invited additional public comment.
Mr. Badder reported he is a Los Angeles County firefighter captain with over 21 years of fire fighting
expedence. He stated that roofs are rated as Class A, B, or C with C being a wood shingle. He said
his roof is a Class A roof. With respect to the comment made by Chairman McNiel regarding
composition shingles coming off his neighbor's roof, he said that cheap composition roofing will
come off. He explained that he had fought in the Oakland, Malibu, and Laguna fires and he saw tiles
being lifted off roofs and houses with tile roofs burn.
Chairman McNiel asked if, in his professional opinion, it made any difference what kind of roof was
on houses dudng fire storms such as he had mentioned.
Mr. Badder acknowledged it would not.
There were no additional public comments.
COmmissioner Mannedno did not believe the applicant had intentionally disregarded the policy. He
said that if the City's Engineering staff is convinced it is fire resistant, he would support retaining the
roof; however, he felt he did not have sufficient information at this time.
Mr. Badder gave a sheet of paper to Mr. Mannerino with a notation that Celotex composition roof is
a Class A roof. '
Commissioner Mannerino said that he saw no compelling reason to make them replace the roof.
Commissioner McNiel stated that although he did not feel the roof is unattractive, he didn't feel it is
as attractive as other tile roofs. He reiterated that the City's policy has been to require tile roofs and
the City has consistently enforced that policy because it serves the community well. He felt the
policy should be retained. He noted the structure was designed and approved for a tile roof.
Commissioner Macias asked what action was necessary.
Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney, indicated the homeowner had requested that the policy be waived
and a vote should be taken on that request.
Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Macias. to deny the waiver of the policy. Motion carried
by the following vote:
AYES: MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: MANNERINO, STEWART
ABSENT: NONE
-carded
Planning Commission Minutes
-7- March 8, 2000
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments at this time.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
G. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRESS
Brad Bullet, City Planner, announced that there was nothing new to repofl.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion: Moved by Mannedno, seconded by Stewari, to adjourn. The Planning Commission
adjourned at 8:26 p.m. to a workshop regarding Pre-Application Review 00-03. The workshop
adjourned at 9:15 p.m. and those minutes appear separately.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
Secretan
Planning Commission Minutes
-8- March 8, 2000
/7'/
THE CITY OF
~,",NCNO C',UCAI~IOI\IGA
Stzff fReport
DATE: April 5, 2000
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lmn, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jon A. Gillespie, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH PRIMA FACIE
SPEED LIMITS ON VARIOUS STREETS
RECOMMENDATION
Approve staffs recommendation to amend Section 10.20.020 of the Municipal Code in order to
establish prima facie speed limits on various streets. The streets, limits. existing and proposed speed
limits are shown on Attacbment "A".
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Section 40802 "SPEED TRAPS" of tile California Vehicle Code requires that a Traffic and
Engineering Survey be conducted at least once every five (5) years for every street segment where
the posted speed limit is to be enforced by radar. If the Traffic and Engineering Survey is more than
five (5) years old, the posted speed limit cannot be enforced by radar or other electronic speed
measuring device. In order to remain in compliance with the California Vehicle Code, City staff has
conducted Traffic and Engineering Surveys for every street segment in the City where a Traffic and
Engineering Survey is reqoired for the enforcement of the posted speed limit with radar. While
working on tbis project, City staff discovered many new street segments that had not previously been
surveyed. These new streets were also surveyed by staff, and are covered in this report.
Section 627 of tile California Vehicle Code requires that Traffic and Engineering Surveys include a
determination of tile prevailing or "85th percentile speed" by using radar, a review of the roadway
segments accident history, and the identification of any roadway characteristics which are not readily
apparent to the motorist. California speed law is based on the State Legislature's belief that the
majority of drivers respond in a safe and reasonable manner to the conditions around them. This is
why the measurement and determination of the 85th percentile speed is such an important factor in
determining a reasonable speed limit.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS
April 5, 2000
Page 2
Down speed zoning of the 85I" percentile speed may also be justified when "conditions not readily
apparent" to a driver are present. Section 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code makes it clear
that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and roadway surface condition or any other
conditions which are readily apparent to a driver are not justification for downward speed zoning.
The Traffic and Engineering Surveys found no conditions not readily apparent to drivers which
would justify a reduction in the posted speed limit. In addition. the accident records indicate that the
sa[~ty records tbr all City streets are very good.
Street segments where the speed limit has changed are as follows:
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (naph)
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
Haveu Aveuue - 4th Street to 19th St. 45
Hellman Avenue - Foothill BIrd. to Church St. 35
Hillside Road - Carnelian St. to Beryl St. 35
Rochester Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd. 40
Victoria St. - Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 25
Victoria Park Lane - Base Line to Day Creek Blvd. 35
Wilson Aveuue- ltaven Ave. to Canistel 40
50
40
40
50
30
40
45
This item was reviewed and recommended for approval by the City's Public Works Sub-committee
on February 16, 2000. The Public Works Sub-committee was concerned about raising the speed
litnit on Victoria Park Lane between Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard from 35 to 40 mph,
and requested that staff re-survey this street segment. On February 16. 2000, City staff gathered new
field measurements and the 85tl' percentile speed was determined to be 43 mph. In addition, we
lbund no unusual circumstances or accident history to justify a reduced limit. Therefore, City staff
recommends posting a new speed limit of 40 mph.
City Engineer
WJO:JAG:jaa
Attachment "A" City map with proposed speed limits
Attachment "B" Summary of streets and proposed speed limits
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Proposed Speed Limits
~,0~ CUCAAfO C*
0 ~:~'
1977
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
I0.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
I7.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
Attachment "B'
SUMMARY OF STREET SEGMENTS
Name of Street and Limits
4th St.-
4"1 St'-
4th St.-
4th St.-
4"1 St.-
6th St.-
6'" St'-
6"' St.-
6th St'-
6Ih St'-
7th St.-
8th St'-
8"' St.-
Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave.
Archibald Ave. to Haven Ave.
Haven Ave. to Milliken Ave.
Milliken Ave. to 1-15 Freeway
1-15 Freeway to Etiwanda Ave.
Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave.
Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave.
Hornrosa Ave. to Haven Ave.
Haven Ave. to Milliken Ave.
Milliken Ave. to Rochester Ave.
Helhnan Ave. to Archibald Ave.
Grove Ave. to Baker Ave.
Baker Ave. to Vineyard Ave.
8Ih St.- Vineyard Ave. to Helhnan Ave.
8th St.- Flelhnan Ave. to Archibald Ave.
8"' St.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave.
8'1' St.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave.
9'" St.- Grove Ave. to Baker Ave.
9th St.- Baker Ave. to Vineyard Ave.
9"' St.- Vineyard Ave. to Flelhuar~ Ave.
9"1 St.- Hcllman Ave. to Archibald Ave.
Amethyst St.- Base Line Rd. to 19"1 St.
Amethyst St.- 19"1 St. to Lemon Ave.
Ametbyst St.- Lemon Ave. to Wilson Ave.
Amethyst St.- Wilson Ave. to Valley View
Archibald Ave.- 4"' St. to 6m St.
Archibald Ave.- 6th St. to 9"' St.
Archibald Ave.- 9th St. to Arrow Rte.
Archibald Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd.
Archibald Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Church St.
Archibald Ave.- Church St. to Base Line Rd.
Archibald Ave.- Base Line Rd. to 19th St.
Archibald Ave.- 19lh St. to Highland Ave.
Archibald Ave.- Highland Ave. to Lemon Ave.
Archibald Ave.- Lemon Ave. to Wilson Ave.
Archibald Ave.- Wilson Ave. to North End
Arrow Rte.- Grove Ave. to Baker Ave.
Arrow Rte.- Baker Ave. to Vineyard Ave.
Arrow Rte.- Vineyard Ave. to Hellman Ave.
Arrow Rte.- Helhnan Ave. to Archibald Ave.
Existing Posted
Speed Limit Onph)
s0
50
55
50
55
45
NP
NP
NP
NP
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
35
40
40
40
35
35
35
35
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
50
45
45
45
45
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
50
50
55
50
55
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
35
40
40
40
35
35
35
35
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
50
45
45
45
45
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (mph)
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
41. Arroxv Rte.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave. 45
42. Arrow Rte.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 45
43. Arrow Rte.- Haven Ave. to White Oak 50
44. Arrow Rte.- White Oak to Milliken Ave. 50
45. ArrowRte.-Milliken Ave. to Rochester Ave. 50
46. Arrow Rte.- Rochester Ave. to Etiwanda Ave. 50
47. Aspen Ave. - Red Oak St. to Foothill Blvd. NP
48. Baker Ave.- 8m St. to Arrow Rte. 35
49. Baker Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd. 35 '
50. Banyan St.- west end to Sapphire St. 40
51. Banym~ St.- Sapphire St. to Carnelian St. 40
52. Banyan St.- Carnelian St. to Beryl St. 40
53. Banyan St.- Beryl St. to Helhnan Ave. 35
54. Banyan St.- Helhnan Ave. to Amethyst St. 35
55. Banyan St.- Anmthyst St. to Archibald Ave. 35
56. Banyan St.- Rmnona Ave. to Hermosa Ave. NP
57. Banyan St.- Hermosa Ave. to Haveo Ave. NP
58. Banyan St.- Haven Ave. to Milliken Ave. 45
59. Banyan St.- Milliken Ave. to Rochester Ave. 45
60. Base Line Rd.- West City Limit to Carnelian St. 45
61. Base Line Rd.- Carnelian St. to Hellman Ave. 40
62. Base Line Rd.- Hellmm~ Ave. to Amhibald Ave. 40
63. Base Line Rd.- Archibald Ave. to Hernmsa Ave. 40
64. Base Line Rd.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 45
65. Base Line Rd.- Haven Ave. to Sprnce Ave. 45
66. Base Line Rd.- Spruce Ave. to Milliken Ave. 50
67. Base Line Rd.- Milliken Ave. to Rochester Ave. 50
68. Base Line Rd.- Rochester Ave. to Victoria Pk Ln 50
69. Base Line Rd.- Victoria Pk Ln to Etiwanda Ave. 50
70. Base Line Rd.- Etiwanda Ave. to East Ave. 50
71. Beryl St.- Base Line Rd. to 19Ih St. 40
72. Beryl St.- 19m St. to Lemon Ave. 40
73. Beryl St.- Lemon Ave. to Banyan St. 40
74. Beryl St.- Banyan St. to Wilson Ave. 45
75. Beryl St.-Wilson Ave. to FIillside Rd. 45
76. Beryl St.- Hillside Rd. to Reales St. 45
· 77. Bnfthlo Ave.- 4th St. tO 6m St. NP
78. Camino Predera- Red Hill CC Dr to 200'N/o Predera Ct. 30
79. Canistel Ave.- Antietam Drive to Wilson Ave. 35
80. Canistel Ave.- Wilson Ave. to Hillside Rd. NP
81. Carnelian St.- Vineyard Ave. to Base Line Rd. 45
82. Carnelian St.- Base Line Rd. to 19Ih St. 45
83. Carnelian St.- 19th St. to Lemon Ave. 45
84. Carnelian St.- Lemon Ave. to Banyan St. 45
45
45
50
50
50
50
35
35
35
40
40
40
35
35
35
30
30
45
45
45
40
45
45
45
45.
50
50
50
50
50
40
40
40
45
45
45
45
30
35
35
45
45
45
45
/Tf
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (mph)
85. Carnelian St.- Banyan St. to Hillside Rd.
86. Carnelian St.- Hillside Rd. to Almond St.
87. Center St.-26th St. to Arrow H;vy.
88. Ceuter St.- Foothill Blvd. to Church St.
89. Chnrch St.- Pepper St. to Arclfibald Ave.
90. Church St.-Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave.
91. Church St.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave.
92. Chnrch St.- Haven Ave. to Tetra Vista Pwky.
93. Church St.- Tetra Vista Pkwy. to Ehn West
94. Church St.- Elnt West to Spruce Ave.
95. Church St.-Spruce Ave. to Ehn East
96. Chnrch St.- Ehn East to Milliken Ave.
97. Civic Center Drive- Haven Ave. to Red Oak
98. Civic Center Drive- Red Oak to White Oak
99. Day Creek Blvd.-gase Line to Victoria Pk Ln
100. Day Creek Blvd.-Victoria Pk Lu to Highland Ave.
101. East Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Miller Ave.
102. East Ave.- Miller Ave. to Base Line Rd.
103. East Ave.- Base Line Rd. to Victoria St.
104. East Ave.- Victoria St. to Highland Ave.
105. East Avc.- Highl,'md Ave. to Summit Ave.
106. Ehn West-Toxvn Center Dr. to Spruce Ave..
I07. Ehn East-Spruce Ave. to Foothill Blvd.
108. Elm Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to White Oak
109. Etiwanda Ave.- 4'h St. to Arrow Rte.
110. Etiwanda Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill BIvd.
I I 1. Etiwanda Ave.- Foothill BIvd. to Base Line Rd.
112. Etixvanda Ave.- Base Line Rd. to Victoria St.
113. Etiwanda Ave.- Victoria St. to Highland Ave.
114. Etiwanda Ave.- Highland Ave. to Summit Ave.
115. Etiwanda Ave.- Snmmit Ave. to Wilson Ave.
116. Etiwanda Ave.- Wilson Ave. to north end
117. Fairu~ont Dr.- Highlaud Ave. to Victoria Pk Ln
I 18. 1:airmont Dr.- Victoria Pk Ln (west) to Milliken Ave.
119. Fairumnt Dr.- Milliken Ave. to Victoria Pk Ln (east)
120. Fredricksburg Ave.- Banyan St. to Seven Pines Dr.
121. Grove Ave.- 8th St. to Arrow Rte.
122. Grove Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd.
123. Haven Ave.- 4m St. to 6m St.
124. Haven Ave.- 6m St. to Jersey BIvd.
125. Haven Ave.- Jersey Blvd. to Arrow Rte.
126. Haven Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Civic Center Dr.
45
45
NP
40
40
40
45
45
45
45
45
45
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
45
45
NP
NP
NP
NP
55
50
45
45
45
45
45
NP
35
35
35
35
40
40
45
45
45
45
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
45
45
35
40
40
40
45
45
45
45
45
45
35
40
50
50
45
45
45
45
45
35
35
40
55
50
45
45
45
45
45
40
35
35
35
35'
40
40
50
50
50
50
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph) Speed Limit (mph)
Helhnan Ave.-
Flelhnan Ave.-
Helhnan Ave.-
Helhnan Ave.-
Hellman Ave.-
Hellman Ave.-
Helhnan Ave.-
Helhnan Ave.-
Hermosa Ave.-
Hermosa Ave.-
Hermosa Ave.-
Hermosa Ave.-
Hemrosa Ave.-
Hornrosa Ave.-
Hermosa Ave.-
Hermosa Ave.-
Hem~osa Ave.-
127. Haven Ave.- Civic Center Dr. to Foothill Blvd.
128. Havea Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Church St.
129. Haven Ave.- Church St. to Base Line Rd.
130. Haven Ave.- Base Line Rd. to Victoria St.
131. Haven Ave.- Victoria St. to 19~h St.
132. Flaven Ave.- 19~h St. to Lemon Ave.
133. Haven Ave.- Lemon Ave. to Wilson Ave.
134. Haven Ave.- Wilson Ave. to Hillside Rd.
135. Haven Ave.- 14illside Rd. to north end
136. Flelhnan Ave.- 6th St. to 8th St.
137. 8"' St. to Arrow Rte.
138. Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd.
139. Foothill Blvd. to Church St.
140. Church St. to Base Line Rd.
141. Base Line Rd. to 19"1 St.
142. 19th St. to Lemon Ave.
143. Lemon Ave. to Manzanita Dr.
144. Manzanita Dr. to Valley View
145. 4th St. to 6th St.
146. 6~h St. to 8u' St.
147. 8t" St. to Arrow Rte.
148. Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd.
149. Foothill Blvd. to Church St.
150. Church St. to Base Line Rd.
151. Base Line Rd. to 19'h St.
152. 19lh St. to Lemon Ave.
153. Lemon Ave. to Wilson Ave.
154. Hermosa Ave.- Wilson Ave. to north end
155. Highland Ave.- Sapphire St. to Carnelian St.
156. Highland Ave.- Amethyst Ave. to Archibald Ave.
157. Highland Ave.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave.
158. Highlined Ave.- Hermosa Ave. to Mayberry Ave.
159. Flillside Rd.- Ranch Gate to Sapphire St.
160. Hillside Rd.- Sapphire St. to Carnelian St.
161. Hillside Rd.- Carnelian St. to Beryl St.
162. Hillside Rd.- Beryl St. to Amethyst St.
163. Hillside Rd.- Amethyst St. to Archibald Ave.
164. Hillside Rd.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave.
165. t-[illside Rd.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave.
166. Hillside Rd.- Haven Ave. to Canistel Ave.
167. Hillview Loop-Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr.
168. Jersey Blvd.- Haven Ave. to Milliken Ave.
45 50
45 50
45 50
45 50
45 50
45 45
45 45
45 45
NP 45
45 45
45 45
45 45
35 40
35 35
35 35
35 35
35 35
40 40
NP 45
NP 45
45 45
45 45
45 45
45 45
45 45
45 45
45 45
40 40
40 40
35 35
35 35
NP 35
35 35
35 35
35 40
35 35
40 40
40 40
40 40
35 35
30 30
NP 45
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (mph)
169. Jersey Blvd.- Milliken Ave. to Rochester Ave. NP
170. Kenyon Way- Milliken Ave. to Victoria Pk Ln 35
17 l. Kenyon Way-Victoria Pk Ln to Ellena NP
172. Lark Drive- Kenyon Way to Rochester Ave. 35
173. Lemon Ave.- Sapphire St. to Carnelian St. 35
174. Lemon Ave.- Carnelian St. to Beryl St. 35
175. Lemon Ave.- Beryl St. to Hellman Ave. 35
176. Lemon Ave.- Helhnan Ave. to Amethyst St. 35
177. Lemon Ave.- Amethyst St. to Archibald Ave. 35
178. Lemon Ave.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave. 40
179. Lemon Ave.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 40
180. Lemon Ave.- Haven Ave. to Terracina Ave. 40
18 I. Lemon Ave.- Terracina Ave. to Highland Ave. 40
182. Manzanita Drive- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 35
183. Milliken Ave.- 4th St. to 6th St. 50
184. Milliken Ave.- 6th St. to 7th St. 50
185. Milliken Ave.- 7m St. to Jersey Blvd. 50
186. Milliken Ave.- Jersey Blvd. to Arrow Rte. 50
187. Milliken Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd. 50
188. Milliken Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd. 50
189. Milliken Ave.- Base Line Rd. to Faimmnt Way 50
190. Milliken Ave.- Fairmont Way to Highland Ave. 50
191. Milliken Ave.- Highland Ave. to Banyan St. 50
192. Morning Place- Banyan St. to Vintage Dr./Meadow Glen NP
193. Mountain View Dr.- Spruce Ave. to Milliken Ave. 40
194. Mountain View Dr. Milliken Ave. to Terra Vista Pkwy. NP
195. Mountain View Dr.- Terra Vista Pkwy. to Base Line Rd. NP
196. Netherlands View Loop- Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr 30
197. Plum Way- N. Victoria Windrows Loop to Coral Tree Rd. NP
198. Ramona Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Church St. 35
199. Ramona Ave.- Church St. to Base Line Rd. 35
200. Rmnona Ave.- Base Line Rd. to Victoria St. 35
201. Ramona Ave.- Victoria St. to 19th St. 35
202. Red Hill CC Dr/-Foothill BIrd. to Alta Cuesta 35
203. Red Oak St.- Jersey Blvd. to Arrow Rte. NP
204. Red Oak St.- Arrow Rte. to Spruce Ave. NP
205. Rochester Ave.- 6th St. to Arrow Rte. NP
206. Rochester Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd. NP
207. Rochester Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd. 40
208. Rochester Ave.- Base Line Rd. to Highland Ave. 50
209. Rochester Ave.- Highland Ave. to Banyan St. 45
210. San Bernardino Rd.- Vineyard Ave. to Hellman Ave. 35
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
40
35
35
35
· 35
35
35
35
35
40
40
40
40
35
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
30
40
40
40
30
25
35
35
35
35
35
40
40
45
45.
50
50
45
35
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (mph)
2 l 1. San Bernardino Rd.- Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave. 35
212. San Sevaine Ave.- Wilson Ave. to Crescenta Way NP
213. Sapphire St.- 19th St. to Bm~yan St. 40
214. Sapphire St.- Banym~ St. to Hillside Rd. 45
215. Sapphire St.- Hillside Rd. to Ahnond St. 45
216. Sierra Crest View Loop- Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr. 30
217. Spruce Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Elm Ave. 40
218. Sprnce Ave.- Ehn East to Base Line Rd. 40
219. Summit Ave.-Bluegrass to Eti~vanda Ave. NP
220. Summit Ave.- Etiwanda Ave. to East Ave. 45
221. Summit Ave.- East Ave. to Wilson Ave. NP
222. Terra Vista Pkwy.- Church St. to Spruce Ave. 40
223. Tetra Vista Pkwy. Spruce Ave. to Milliken Ave. 40
224. Tetra Vista Pkwy. - Milliken Ave. to Mountain View Dr. NP
225. Terrace View Loop-Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr. 30
226. Town Center Dr.-Haven Ave. to Ehn West NP
227. To~vn Center Dr.-Elm West to Spruce NP
228. Victoria St.- Archibald Ave. to Ramona Ave. 35
229. Victoria St.- Ramona Ave. to Hermosa Ave. NP
230. Victoria St.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 25
23 I. Victoria St.- Haven Ave. to Mendocino Pi. 40
232. Victoria St.- Eti~vanda Ave. to East Ave. 40
233. Victoria St.- East Ave. to I-15 Freeway 40
234. Victoria Pk Ln - Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. 35
235. Victoria Pk Ln - Milliken Ave. to Kenyon Way 35
236. Victoria Pk Ln - Kenyon Way to Rochester Ave. 35
237. Victoria Pk Ln - Rochester Ave. to Day Creek Blvd. NP
238. Victoria Pk Ln - Day Creek BIrd. to Base Line Rd. 35
239. Victoria Windrows Loop (NW)- VPL to Rock Rose Ave. 35
240. Victoria Windroxvs Loop (NE)- Rock Rose Ave. to VPL 35
241. Victoria Windro~vs Loop (South)- VPL to VPL 35
242. Vineyard Ave.- 8"' St. to Arrow Rte. 45
243. Vineyard Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd. 45
244. Vineyard Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Carnelian St. 45
245. Vineyard Ave.- Carnelian St. to Churcl'i St. 40
246. Vineyard Ave.- Church St. to Base Line Rd. 40
247. Vintage Drive-Morning Pl./Meadow Glen to Milliken Ave. 35
248. Vintage Drive- Millik~n Ave. to Rochester Ave. 35
249. Wardman Bullock Rd.- Wilson Ave. to Glendora Dr. NP
250. White Oak Ave.- Jersey Blvd. to Arrow Rte. NP
25 I. White Oak Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Spruce Ave. NP
252. Whittram Ave.- Etiwanda Ave. to Hickory Ave. 40
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
35
35
40
45
45
30
40
40
45
45
50
40
40
40
30
40
40
35
30
30
40
40
40
35
35
35
40
40
35
35
35
45
45
45
40
40
35
35
40
40
40
40
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (mph)
253. Wilson Ave.- Amethyst Ave. to Archibald Ave. 45
254. Wilson Ave.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave. 45
255. Wilson Ave.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 45
256. Wilson Ave.- Haven Ave. to Canistel Ave. 40
257. Wilson Ave.-(frmly Summit Ave) Summit to Cherry Aves NP
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
45
45
45
45
45
ORDrN CE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION
10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE
REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN
CITY STREETS
A. Recitals
(i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 Provides that this City Council may,
by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway.
(i i) The City Traffic Engineer has condncted an engineering and traffic survey, of
certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part B of this
Ordinance.
(iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B,
below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ii), above.
B. Ordinance
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section
Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucarnonga City Code to read,
in words and figures, as follows:
10.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City Council
resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by
state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets,
and it is declared the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or
parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof:
(Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph) Speed Limit (mph)
I. 4'h St.- Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave. 50 50
2. 4Ih St.- Archibald Ave. to Haven Ave. 50 50
3. 4'1' St.- Haven Ave. to Milliken Ave. 55 55
4. 4'h St.- Milliken Ave. to 1-15 Freeway 50 50
5. 4"1 St.- 1-15 Freeway to Etiwanda Ave. 55 55
6. 6II' St.- Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave. 45 45
7. 6Ih St.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave. NP 45
SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE
Page 2
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (mph)
9.
10.
II.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
6'h St.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave.
6'" St.- Haven Ave. to Milliken Ave.
6'h St.- Milliken Ave. to Rochester Ave.
7'h St.- Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave.
8"1 St.- Grove Ave. to Baker Ave.
8'" St.- Baker Ave. to Vineyard Ave.
8tl' St.- Vineyard Ave. to Helhnan Ave.
8'" St.- Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave.
8'h St.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave.
8'h St.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave.
9'" St.- Grove Ave. to Baker Ave.
9'h St.- Baker Ave. to Vineyard Ave,
9'" St.- Vineyard Ave. to Helhnan Ave.
9'" St.- Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave.
Amethyst St.- Base Line Rd. to 19'h St.
Amethyst St.- 19'1' St, to Lemon Ave.
Amethyst St.- Lemon Ave. to Wilson Ave.
Amethyst St.- Wilson Ave. to Valley View
Archibald Ave.- 4'h St. to 6"' St.
Archibald Ave.- 6'" St. to 9"' St.
Archibald Ave.-
Archibald Ave,-
Archibald Ave.-
Archibald Ave.-
Archibald Ave.-
Archibald Ave.-
Archibald Ave.-
Archibald Ave.-
9'l' St. to Arrow Rte.
Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd.
Foothill Blvd. to Church St.
Church St. to Base Line Rd.
Base Line Rd. to 19'" St.
19'h St. to Highland Ave.
Highland Ave. to Lemon Ave.
Lemon Ave. to Wilson Ave,
Archibald Ave.- Wilson Ave. to North End
Arrow Rte.- Grove Ave. to Baker Ave.
Arrow Rte.- Baker Ave. to Vineyard Ave.
Arrow Rte.- Vineyard Ave. to Hellman Ave.
Arrow Rte.- Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave.
Arrow Rte.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave.
Arrow Rte.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave.
NP
NP
NP
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
35
40
40
40
35
35
35
35
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
50
45
45
45
45
45
45
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
35
40
40
40
35
35
35
35
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
50
45
45
45
45
45
45
SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE
Page 3
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (mph)
43. Arrow Rte.- Haven Ave. to White Oak 50
44. Arrow Rte.- White Oak to Milliken Ave. 50
45. ArrowRte,-Milliken Ave. to Rochester Ave. 50
46. Arrow Rte.- Rochester Ave. to Etiwanda Ave. 50
47. Aspen Ave. - Red Oak St. to Foothill Blvd. NP
48. Baker Ave,- 8"' St. to Arrow Rte. 35
49. Baker Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd. 35
50. Banyan St.- west end to Sapphire St. 40
51. Banyan St.- Sapphire St. to Carnelian St. 40
52. Banyan St.- Carnelian St. to Beryl St. 40
53. Banyan St.- Beryl St. to Hellman Ave. 35
54. Banyan St.- Hellnmn Ave. to Amethyst St. 35
55. Banyan St.- Amethyst St. to Archibald Ave. 35
56. Banyan St.- Ramona Ave. to Hermosa Ave. NP
57. Banyan St.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. NP
58. Banym~ St.- Haven Ave. to Mitliken Ave. 45
59. Banyan St.- Milliken Ave. to Rochester Ave. 45
60. Base Line Rd.- West City Limit to Carnelian St. 45
61. Base Line Rd.- Carnelian St. to Hellman Ave. 40
62. Base Line Rd.- Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave. 40
63. Base Line Rd.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave. 40
64. Base Line Rd.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 45
65. Base Line Rd.- Haven Ave. to Spruce Ave. 45
66. Base Line Rd.- Spruce Ave. to Milliken Ave. 50
67. Base Line Rd.- Milliken Ave, to Rochester Ave. 50
68. Base Line Rd.- Rochester Ave. to Victoria Pk Ln 50
69. Base Line Rd.- Victoria Pk Ln to Etiwanda Ave. 50
70. Base Line Rd.- Etiwanda Ave. to East Ave. 50
71. Beryl St.- Base Line Rd. to 19"' St. 40
72. Beryl St.- 19'h St. to Lemon Ave. 40
73. Beryl St.- Lemon Ave. to Banyan St. 40
74. Beryl St.- Banyan St. to Wilson Ave. 45
75. Beryl St.-Wilson Ave. to Hillside Rd. 45
76. Beryl St.- Hillside Rd. to Reales St. 45
77. Buffalo Ave.- 4th St. to 6th St. NP
78. Cmnino Predera- Red Hill CC Dr to 200'N/o Predera Ct. 30
79. Canistel Ave.- Antietam Drive to Wilson Ave. 35
80. Canistel Ave.- Wilson Ave. to Hillside Rd. NP
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
50
50
50
50
35
35
35
40
40
40
35
35
35
30
30
45
45
45
40
45
45
45
45
50
50
50
50
50
40
40
40
45
45
45
45
30
35
35
SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE
Page 4
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (mph)
81. Carnelian St.- Vineyard Ave. to Base Line Rd.
82. Carnelian St.- Base Line Rd. to 19'h St.
83. Carnelian St.- 19th St. to Lemon Ave.
84. Carnelian St.- Lemon Ave. to Banyan St.
85. ,Carnelian St.- Banyan St. to Hillside Rd.
86. Carnelian St.- Hillside Rd. to Almond St.
87. Center St.-26Ih St. to Arrow Hwy.
88. Center St.- Foothill Blvd. to Church St.
89. Church St.- Pepper St. to Archibald Ave.
90. Church St.-Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave.
91. Church St.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave.
92. Church St.- Haven Ave. to Terra Vista Pwky.
93. Church St.- Term Vista Pkwy. to Elm West
94. Church St.- Elm West to Spruce Ave.
95. Church St.-Spruce Ave. to Elm East
96. Church St.- Ehn East to Milliken Ave.
97. Civic Center Drive- Haven Ave. to Red Oak
98. Civic Center Drive- Red Oak to White Oak
99. Day Creek Blvd.-Base Line to Victoria Pk Ln
100. Day Creek Blvd.-Victoria Pk Ln to Highland Ave.
101. East Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Miller Ave.
102. East Ave.- Miller Ave. to Base Line Rd.
103. East Ave.- Base Line Rd. to Victoria St.
104. East Ave.- Victoria St. to Highland Ave.
105. East Ave.- Highland Ave. to Summit Ave.
106. Elm West-Town Center Dr. to Spruce Ave..
107. Elm East-Spruce Ave. to Foothill Blvd.
108. Ehn Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to White Oak
109. Etiwanda Ave.- 4'h St. to Arrow Rte.
10. Etiwanda Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd.
11. Etiwanda Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd.
12. Etiwanda Ave.- Base Line Rd. to Victoria St.
13. Etiwanda Ave.- Victoria St. to Highland Ave.
14. Etiwanda Ave.- Highland Ave. to Summit Ave.
15. Etiwanda Ave.- Summit Ave. to Wilson Ave.
16. Etiwanda Ave.- Wilson Ave. to north end
17. Fairmont Dr.- Highland Ave. to Victoria Pk Ln
18. Fairmont Dr.- Victoria Pk Ln (west) to Milliken Ave.
45
45
45
45
45
45
NP
40
40
40
45
45
45
45
45
45
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
45
45
NP
NP
NP
NP
55
50
45
45
45
45
45
NP
35
35
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
45
45
45
45
45
45
35
40
40
40
45
45
45
45
45
45
35
40
50
50
45
45
45
45
45
35
35
40
55
50
45
45
45
45
45
40
35
35
SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE
Page 5
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (mph)
I 19. Fairmont Dr.- Milliken Ave. to Victoria Pk Ln (east)
120. Fredricksburg Ave.- Banyan St. to Seven Pines Dr.
121. Grove Ave.- 8th St. to Arrow Rte.
122. Grove Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd.
123. Haven Ave.- 4'h St. to 6'1' St.
124. Haven Ave.- 6'h St. to Jersey Blvd.
125. Haven Ave.- Jersey Blvd. to Arrow Rte.
126. Haven Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Civic Center Dr.
I27. Haven Ave.- Civic Center Dr. to Foothill BIrd.
128. Haven Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Church St.
129. Haven Ave.- Chnrch St. to Base Line Rd.
130. Haven Ave.- Base Line Rd. to Victoria St.
131. Haven Ave.- Victoria St. to 19'1' St.
132. Haven Ave.- 19'h St. to Lemon Ave.
133. Haven Ave.- Lemon Ave. to Wilson Ave.
134. Haveu Ave.- Wilson Ave. to Hillside Rd.
135. Haven Ave.- Hillside Rd. to north end
136. Helhnan Ave.- 6"' St. to 8'" St.
137. Helhnan Ave.- 8'" St. to Arrow Rte.
138. Hclhnau Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd.
139. Helhnan Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Church St.
140. Helhnan Ave.- Church St, to Base Line Rd.
141. Helhnau Ave.- Base Line Rd. to 19'1' St.
142. Hellman Ave.- 19'" St. to Lemon Ave.
143. Hellman Ave.- Lemon Ave. to Manzanita Dr.
144. Hellman Ave.- Manzanita Dr. to Valley View
145. Hermosa Ave.- 4"' St. to 6'h St.
146. Hermosa Ave.- 6'h St. to 8'h St.
147. Hermosa Ave.- 8'h St. to Arrow Rte.
148. Hermosa Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd.
149. Hermosa Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Church St.
150. Hermosa Ave.- Church St. to Base Line Rd.
151. Hermosa Ave.- Base Line Rd. to 19Ih St.
152. Itemrosa Ave.- 19'" St. to Lemon Ave.
153. Hermosa Ave.- Lemon Ave. to Wilson Ave.
154. l-lern~osa Ave.- Wilson Ave. to noah end
155. Highland Ave.- Sapphire St. to Carnelian St.
156. Highland Ave.- Amethyst Ave. to Archibald Ave.
35
35
40
40
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
NP
45
45
45
35
35
35
35
35
40
NP
NP
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
40
40
35
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
35
35
40
40
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
40
35
35
35
35
40
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
40
40
35
SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE
Page 6
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (mph)
157. Highland Ave.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave. 35
158. Highland Ave.- Hermosa Ave. to Mayberry Ave. NP
159. Hillside Rd.- Ranch Gate to Sapphire St. 35
160. Hillside Rd.- Sapphire St. to Carnelian St. 35
I61. Hillside Rd.- Carnelian St. to Beryl St. 35
162. Hillside Rd.- Beryl St. to Amethyst St. 35
163. Hillside Rd.- Amethyst St. to Amhibald Ave. 40
164. Hillside Rd.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave. 40
165. Hillside Rd.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 40
166. Hillside Rd.- Haven Ave. to Canistel Ave. 35
167. Hillview Loop-Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr. 30
168. Jersey Blvd.- Haven Ave. to Milliken Ave. NP
169. Jersey Blvd.- Milliken Ave. to Rochester Ave. NP
170. Kenyon Way- Milliken Ave. to Victoria Pk Ln 35
171. Kenyon Way-Victoria Pk Ln to Ellena NP
172. Lark Drive- Kenyon Way to Rochester Ave. 35
173. Lemon Ave.- Sapphire St. to Carnelian St. 35
174. l~emon Ave.- Carnelian St. to Beryl St. 35
175. Lemon Ave.- Beryl St. to Hellman Ave. 35
76. Lemon Ave.- Helhnan Ave. to Amethyst St. 35
77. Lemon Ave.- Amethyst St. to Archibald Ave. 35
78. Lemon Ave.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave. 40
79. Lemon Ave.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 40
80. Lemon Ave.- Haven Ave. to Terracina Ave. 40
81. Lemon Ave.- Terracioa Ave. to Highland Ave. 40
82. Manzanita Drive- Hermosa ~Ave. to Haven Ave. 35
83. Milliken Ave.- 4'1' St. to 6'h St. 50
84. Milliken Ave.- 6'1' St. to 7'h St. 50
85. Milliken Ave.- 7'1' St. to Jersey Blvd. 50
86. Milliken Ave.- Jersey Blvd. to Arrow Rte. 50
87. Milliken Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd. 50
88. Milliken Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd. 50
89. Milliken Ave.- Base Line Rd. to Fairmont Way 50
190. Milliken Ave.- Fairmont Way to Highland Ave. 50
191. Milliken Ave.- Highland Ave. to Banyan St. 50
I92. Morning Place- Banyan St. to Vintage Dr./Meadow Glen NP
193. Mountain View Dr.- Spruce Ave. to Milliken Ave. 40
I94. Mountain View Dr. Milliken Ave. to Tetra Vista Pkwy. NP
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
35
35
35
35
40
35
40
40
40
35
30
45
40
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
40
40
40
40
35
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
30
40
40
SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE
Page 7
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (mph)
195. Mountain View Dr.- Terra Vista Pkwy. to Base Line Rd. NP
196. Netherlands View Loop- Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr 30
197. Plum Way- N. Victoria Windrows Loop to Coral Tree Rd. NP
198. Ramona Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Church St. 35
199. Ramona Ave.- Church St. to Base Line Rd. 35
200. Rmnona Ave.- Base Line Rd. to Victoria St. 35
201, Ramona Ave.- Victoria St. to 19'h St. 35
202. Red Hill CC Dr/-Foothill Blvd. to Alta Cuesta 35
203. Red Oak St.- Jersey Blvd. to Arrow Rte. NP
204. Red Oak St.- Arrow Rte. to Spruce Ave. NP
205. Rochester Ave.- 6'" St. to Arro~v Rte. NP
206. Rochester Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd. NP
207. Rochester Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd. 40
208. Rochester Ave.- Base Line Rd. to Highland Ave. 50
229. Rochester Ave.- Highland Ave. to Banyan St. 45
210. San Bernardino Rd.- Vineyard Ave. to Hellman Ave. 35
211. San Bernardino Rd.- Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave. 35
212. San Sevaine Ave.- Wilson Ave. to Crescenta Way NP
213. Sapphire St.- 19'h St. to Banyan St. 40
214. Sapphire St.- Banyan St. to Hillside Rd. 45
215. Sapphire St.- Hillside Rd. to Ah'nond St. 45
216. Sierra Crest View Loop- Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr. 30
217. Spruce Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Elm Ave. 40
218. Spruce Ave.- Elm East to Base Line Rd. 40
219. Summit Ave.-Bluegrass to Etiwanda Ave. NP
220. Summit Ave.- Etiwanda Ave. to East Ave. 45
221. Sununit Ave.- East Ave. to Wilson Ave. NP
222. Terra Vista Pkwy.- Church St. to Spruce Ave. 40
223. Terra Vista Pkwy. Spruce Ave. to Milliken Ave. 40
224. Tetra Vista Pkwy. - Milliken Ave. to Mountain View Dr. NP
225. Terrace View Loop-Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr. 30
226. Town Center Dr.-Haven Ave. to Elm West NP
227. Town Center Dr.-Ehn West to Spruce NP
228. Victoria St.- Archibald Ave. to Ramona Ave. 35
229. Victoria St.- Ramona Ave. to Hermosa Ave. NP
230. Victoria St.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 25
23 I. Victoria St.- Haven Ave. to Mendocino PI. 40
232. Victoria St.- Etiwanda Ave. to East Ave. 40
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
40
30
25
35
35
35
35
35
40
40
45
45
50
50
45
35
35
35
40
45
45
30
40
40
45
45
50
40
40
40
30
40
40
35
30
30
40
40
SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE
Page 8
Nanre of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (mph)
233. Victoria St.- East Ave. to 1-15 Freeway 40
234. Victoria Pk Ln - Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. 35
235. Victoria Pk Ln - Milliken Ave. to Kenyon Way 35
236. Victoria Pk Ln - Kenyoo Way to Rochester Ave. 35
237. Victoria Pk Ln - Rochester Ave. to Day Creek Blvd. NP
238. Victoria Pk Ln - Day Creek Blvd. to Base Line Rd. 35
239. Victoria Windrows Loop (NW)- VPL to Rock Rose Ave. 35
240. Victoria Windrows Loop CNE)- Rock Rose Ave. to VPL 35
241. Victoria Windrows Loop (South)- VPL to VPL 35
242. Vineyard Ave.- 8'" St. to Arrow Rte. 45
243. Vioeyard Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Foothill Blvd. 45
244. Vioeyard Ave.- Foothill Blvd. to Carnelian St. 45
245. Vineyard Ave.- Carnelian St. to Church St. 40
246. Vineyard Ave.- Church St. to Base Line Rd. 40
247. Vintage Drive-Morning Pl./Meadow Glen to Milliken Ave. 35
248. Viotage Drive- Milliken Ave. to Rochester Ave. 35
249. Wardman Bullock Rd.- Wilson Ave. to Glendora Dr. NP
250. White Oak Ave.- Jersey Blvd. to Arrow Rte. NP
251. White Oak Ave.- Arrow Rte. to Spruce Ave. NP
252. Whirtram Ave.- Etiwanda Ave. to Hickory Ave. 40
253. Wilson Ave.- Amethyst Ave. to Archibald Ave. 45
254. Wilson Ave.- Archibald Ave. to Hermosa Ave. 45
255. Wilson Ave.- Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 45
256. Wilson Ave.- Haven Ave. to Canistel Ave. 40
257. Wilson Ave.-(formerly Summit Ave) NP
Summit to Cherry Aves.
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
40
35
35
35
40
40
35
35
35
45
45
45
40
40
35
35
40
40
40
40
45
45
45
45
45
(i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds
which are more than are reasonable or safe; and
(ii) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate
to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on
said streets or portions thereof; and
(iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on
said streets; and
(iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs
upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein.
SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE
Page 9
Section 2
The City Clerk shall certify, to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be
published as required by law.
Section 3
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published
within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Inland Daily Bulletin· a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, Calitbrnia, and circulated in the City of
Ranclio Cucamonga.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
William J. Alexander
Dcbra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBR2\ J. ADAMS. CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucanlonga, California, do
hcrcby certify that the tbregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of
the City of Rancho Cucan~onga held on the and was passed at a regular meeting
of tile City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the
Executed this
· at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
T H E C I T Y 0 F
~ANC~O C~rCA~ONGA
St3ffRe rt
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
April 5, 2000
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING SECTION 2.12.010 OF CHAPTER
2.12 OF TITLE II OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO THE LOCATION OF REGULAR CITY COUNCIL
MEETINGS AND DETERMINING THE DAYS, PLACE AND TIME FOR
HOLDING REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the City Council approve first reading of Ordinance No. 421A and set
second reading for the April 19 City Council meeting, and approve Resolution No. 90-
227A.
ANALSIS
Prior to moving to the Civic Center facility in 1990, a Resolution and Ordinance were
approved to establish City Council meetings to occur on the first and third Wednesday
of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
It is being requested that the City Council set Ordinance No. 421A for second reading
and approve Resolution No. 90-227A which will establish the following for all regular
City Council meetings effective April 19, 2000:
A. All City Council meetings will be held on the first and third Wednesday of each
month
B. Commencing at 5:30 p.m. in the Tapia Room on the Upper Level of the Civic Center
located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, executive session items will be conducted
C. The remainder of each regular City Council meeting shall commence at 7:00 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive
If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.
City Clerk
Attachments: Ordinance No. 421A
Resolution No. 90-227A
-2-
~XR-21-00 ?UE 12:57 PM RW&G 0BANG~ COUNTY FAX ~O. 714 990 62~0 B. 2
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING SECTION
2.12.010 OF CHAPTER 2.12 OF TITLE 11 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTMNING TO
THE LOCATION OF REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
The City Council of the City of Raneho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1: Section 2.12.010 of Chapter2.12 of Title II of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code hereby is amended 'to read, in words usxd figures, as
follows:
"2.12.0~0 Meeting Place. Regular meet~gs of the City Council shall be
held at a specific location or locations within the Civic Cemer located at 10500
Civic Center Drive, Kancho Cucamonga, California, established by Resolution of
this Council."
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordlnanco and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once
in Inland Valley DaiLy Bulletin. a newspaper of general circulation published in the City
of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City ofRancho Cucamenga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19m day of ApriL 2000.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
William J, Alexander, Mayor
Debra J. Adsins, City Clerk
S\RC\ORDLOCATION
~Al-21-OB TUE 12:58 ?~ t~l~{ ORANGE COUHtY ;AX NO, 21{ 9gO B2SO P. ~
A RESOLUTION OY THE CITY COUI~CIL OF THE CITY
OF RA~CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING
THE DAYS, PLACE AND Tl~rg FOR HOLDING REGULAR
MEETINGS OF THg CIT¥ COUNCIL
WI-IEI~AS, the City Council of the City of Ranclio Cucmnonga doe~
hereby resolve as follows:
Section l: Regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Cit:; Council
shall be held at the Civic Center complex located at 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California, on 1he first and tbj~cl Wednesday of each manlh. F. ach
such regular meeting commencing wkh the meeting of April 19, 2000 shall commence at
5:30 p.m. in the Tapia Roum m~ th~ Upper L~v~l of the Civic Center for purposes of
conducting an executive session only. The remainder of each such meeting shall
commence and be conducted at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center
Section 2: Said regular meetings shall continue to occur on the first
and third Wednesday ~of caclt mo~th ill tile Council Chambers as ~tatcd above.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5m day of April, 2000.
. AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
t B
Rancho
city
Cucamonga
o f
Staff Report
DATE: April 5, 2000
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
BY:
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL TO' AWARD AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT TO BOYLE
ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR PREPARATION OF A TRAIL SYSTEM
MASTER PLAN WITHIN THE FORMER SOUTHERN PACIFIC BALDWIN PARK
RAILROAD CORRIDOR (PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY) IN THE AMOUNT OF
$152,000 TO BE FUNDED FROM VALLEY MEASURE I TRAFFIC MANCEMENT
AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT FUNDS DEPOSITED BY THE SAN
BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS INTO ACCOUNT NO.
01-3901-7310 (FY 00/01).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council, through minute action, authorize the Mayor to execute the
Professional Services Agreement awarding the subject contract to Boyle Engineering Corporation.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Scope of Services: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, will oversee the
consultant work to prepare a Trail System Master Plan for the Pacific Electric Trail. The proposed
21-mile long "rails-to-trail" would utilize the former Pacific Electric Railway and join six communities:
Claremont, Montclair, Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana and Rialto. The preparation of the Master
Plan has been funded by the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG). The Master Plan
will become the basis for grant applications to fund trail design and construction. Major elements of the
plan will include vision statement, design (plans, sections, illustrative sketches), discussion of
right-of-way issues, cost estimates, community involvement, and funding recommendations. The plan
is not intended to be a working drawing, but should have sufficient detail to allow a designer to prepare
construction drawings. For a detailed list of tasks to be performed and the Master Plan process, please
refer to the Professional Services Agreement.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
April 5, 2000
Page 2
Selected Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation was one of three qualified firms invited to
submit a proposal. They were the successful proposal because of their familiarity with the issues
of developing a trail within a rail corridor. Boyle Engineering Corporation is a national firm with
offices in Ontario. Boyle Engineering Corporation will be assisted by ALTA Consulting, experts in
bicycle trail planning, and Lynn Capouya, Inc., a landscape architecture firm responsible for the
Pacific Electric Right-Of-Way Aesthetics Plan. This team was involved in the preparation of Trail
Master Plans for rails-to-trail projects in several cities/regions. Further, their proposal demonstrated
a grasp of the rails-to-trail issues and defined a suitable process for preparation of the master plan,
including public participation. The firm is available to begin work immediately. The total cost of the
contract is $152,000.
Copies of the proposed contract are available in the office of the City Clerk. The City Attorney has
reviewed and approved the contract as to form.
Respectfully~bmitted,
mu.ity Develo.ment Direotor
RG:DC/Is
TH E C ITY 0 F
]~ANC~O CUCAMONGA
StaffRel rt
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
April 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
CONSIDERATION QF A REQUEST TO UPDATE THE CITY'S SMOKING
ORDINANCE
The City has received a request from the Tobacco Use Reduction Now (TURN)
program of the County Public Health Department to revisit our smoking ordinance and
update it in light of changes to the law. Because our ordinance is over 10 years old it
does not reflect some of the recent changes that have occurred at the state and federal
level. The Health Department requests that the City consider updating its ordinance to
take advantage of changes in the law to enhance our ability to reduce the effects of
second hand smoke and to keep tobacco products out of the hands of minors.
It is recommended that the City Council refer this matter to the Public Safety
subcommittee to review the current City ordinance and evaluate any proposed changes.
Upon completing this task, the subcommittee would recommend any changes to the full
City Council for their consideration.
R ectfully s~
RAN CHO CUCAM ONGA
COMMUNITY SERVICES
S affRepo
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
April 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent
CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND
RECREATION COMMMISSION ON A POLICY FOR INSTALLATION OF
SCOREBOARDS AT CITY PARKS
RECOMMENDATION:
The Park and Recreation Commission is recommending that the City Council approve
the attached proposed policy, concerning installation of sports field scoreboards, to be
used by Rancho Cucamonga Youth Sports Organizations in City parks.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City Council Park and Recreation Sub-Committee previously requested that the
Park and Recreation Commission submit a recommended scoreboard installation policy
to the full City Council for their review and approval. The Park and Recreation
Commission did approve such a policy proposed by staff at their February 17, 2000
Park and Recreation Commission meeting. This attached policy is being forwarded for
your consideration. Within the last few years, there has been an increased interest by
Rancho Cucamonga youth sports organizations in acquiring scoreboards for City
playing facilities that they use. The City Council Park and Recreation Sub-Committee
has requested that a policy be developed that addresses a process in which youth
sports groups are able to request and assist with the installation of electronic
scoreboards, at key game facilities located within City parks. The Park and Recreation
Commission has adopted for your consideration a proposed ""Scoreboard Purchase
and Installation Request" policy. It is proposed that the youth sports organizations be
responsible for 50% of the total scoreboard purchase, installation, and associated costs.
The organizations may remit payment once installation has occurred or over a period
not to exceed three years. The proposed policy is attached to this report.
MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
POLICY FOR INSTALLATION OF SCOREBOARDS
April 5, 2000
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
If all the recommended park game facilities (twelve sports field sites) are fitted with
electronic scoreboards, then the initial cost to the City could amount to $310,000. It is
likely that up to eleven requests could be submitted initially. Probably not all twelve for
the reason that one and maybe two of these other potential scoreboard sites fall under a
user (s) with more than one potential scoreboard site. It is presumed that these groups
will only be able to afford one scoreboard at a time. Note: Three of the twelve
scoreboards identified by staff would be on facilities located in the Rancho Cucamonga
Epicenter used solely by the City sponsored adult softball program.
It is difficult to project when these organizations will submit a request to the City for
scoreboard installation. For this reason, it can be in the near future or several years
before the City incurs the expense and the groups reimburse the City half of the cost.
However, once all twelve scoreboards have been installed and reimbursements (50% of
total costs) have been received, the City's total cost will be reduced to about $195,500
which includes half the cost for the youth sports fields and the total cost of the three (3)
adult softball fields. If multiple requests for assistance are received sports groups
during any one particular year, it may become necessary for the City to prioritize the
requests ver a multi-year period, depending on availability of funds.
Resp ~
rdleKev
Community Services Director
Attachment: Scoreboard Purchase and Installation Request Policy
I: COMMSERV~Council&BoardsltStaffrep ~Scorebrd. 040500
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
SCOREBOARD PURCHASE AND
INSTALLATION REQUEST POLICY
POLICY NO.:
PAGE: 1 of 2
EFFECTIVE:
REVISED:
APPROVED:
SUBJECT:
SCOREBOARD PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION REQUEST
POLICY
PURPOSE:
Develop a process that enables all Rancho Cucamonga youth sports
organizations the ability to participate in the request and purchase of an
electronic scoreboard for their designated City park game facility.
POLICY:
The following procedures will be followed by all youth sports organizations
who desire to participate in the purchase and installation of an electronic
scoreboard for a City game facility that they use.
GENERAL POLICIES AND GUIDELINES:
During recent years there has been an increasing interest by resident youth sports
organizations to pumhase and install electronic scoreboards at key game facilities within
City Parks. For some sports, such as baseball and softball, an electronic scoreboard is not
only a facility amenity but also something that parents and spectators rely on to stay
abreast of a game that they are watching. This popular amenity not only improves a ball
diamond aesthetically but also may assist the youth sports organization in their recruitment
of youth oriented all-star and regional tournaments to these facilities.
Any youth sports organization that chooses to submit a request for scoreboard
installation must submit their request by February 1 of the preceding fiscal year of the
year in which they desire installation. Once the City has received and approved this
request, then each site will have to be analyzed by City engineering staff to determine
the actual cost of scoreboard purchase and installation.
All youth sports organizations that request installation of an electronic scoreboard will
be responsible for 50% of the total purchase cost of the scoreboard and all
associated materials. The requesting organization will also be responsible for 50%
of all direct and associated installation costs.
3. Installation of electronic scoreboards will be limited to traditional and intensively used
game facilities that exhibit a need for such a scoreboard. The following City parks'
Scoreboard Purchase and Installation Request Policy - Page 2 of 2
sports fields have been identified as key game facilities that traditionally attract
intensive game use. However, those facilities that are primarily practice venues are
not considered to be eligible for scoreboard requests.
The following park facilities have been identified as facilities used primarily for games.
The number of scoreboards that can be installed per park and type of scoreboard are
also indicated below. This eligibility list only denotes those facilities that have been
developed and does not include any future facilities that may require scoreboards
once developed. Any other request outside of this eligibility list shall be submitted to
the Sports Advisory Committee and Park Recreation Commission to determine
eligibility for scoreboard consideration.
A. Etiwanda Creek Community Park:
B. Hermosa Park:
C. Heritage Community Park:
D. Red Hill Community Park:
E.' Epicenter Sports Complex:
Two scoreboards (football)
One scoreboard (baseball)
One scoreboard (baseball)
Four scoreboards (2 baseball, 2 softball)
*Four scoreboards (1 baseball, 3 softball)
*Note: The three softball fields identified for scoreboard consideration, at the
Epicenter Sports Complex, are used solely by City sponsored adult softball
leagues.
Scoreboard manufacture and model will be selected by City engineering staff to
insure standardization amongst City parks. It is equally important to insure that all
scoreboards are installed considering the overall aesthetics and uses of the park
facilities and irs amenities,
All scoreboards that are purchased and once installed are done so as a gift to the City
and become the property of the City. Any damages or losses that occur due to the
use of the participating organization become the responsibility of the user group. Use
of the scoreboards will be available to any organization that receives City approval
and not limited or restricted by the organization that contributed to its purchase and
installation. Routine maintenance of the scoreboards will be completed by the City.
The amount due and payable to the City (50% of the total purchase and installation
cost), by the requesting youth sports organization, is be paid at the completion of
installation. The applying group can also elect to reimburse the City, within the
parameters of a mutually agreed upon payment schedule, over a period of time not
to exceed three (3) years.
In the event that multiple scoreboard requests are received by the City during any one
particular year, it may be necessary for the City to priodtize the requests over a multi-
year period, subject to availability of funding.
I:\COMMSER\Policies~Scoreboardlnstall.00