HomeMy WebLinkAbout87-195 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 87-195
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYING A
REQUEST TO DELETE A PORTION OF A LOCAL
EQUESTRIAN TRAIL EASEMENT ADJACENT TO THE
SOUTH SIDE OF LOTS 2 AND 3 AND THE WEST
SIDE OF LOTS 3 AND 4 OF TRACT 10046 LOCATED
GENERALLY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HILLSIDE ROAD,
WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
(i) SHARON MORROW, owner of Lot 3 of Tract No. 10046,
on behalf of herself and the property owners of Lots 2 and 4 of
Tract 10046, has filed an application requesting the deletion of
a portion of a local equestrian trail easement as described above
in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject request shall be referred to as "the Application. " A
map depicting that approximate area of the local equestrian trail
easement pertaining to the application is attached hereto, marked
as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated herein by this reference.
(ii) On December 5, 1984 , the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved, by resolution, Tentative
Tract No. 10046. As part of said approval , equestrian trails, as
recommended by the City, were required within the subdivision
consisting of a community equestrian trail along Hillside Road
and local equestrian trails, including that which is the subject
of the application, throughout the tract to connect to the
community equestrian trail .
(iii) On October 14, 1987 , the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on the application and said public hearing was concluded
prior to the adoption of this Resolution.
(iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of
this Resolution have occurred.
S. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by
the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as
follows:
1
Resolution No. Page 2
1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Resolution.
2 . Based upon the substantial evidence presented to
the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public
hearing on October 14 , 1987, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to the local equestrian
trail easement located on the south side of Lots 2 and 3 of Tract
10046 and the west side of Lots 3 and 4 of Tract 10046;
b. Said Lots 2 , 3 and 4 are currently developed
with single family residences and the subject local equestrian
trail easement is included within the rear yard portions of said
lots;
c. The properties to the north and east of the
subject site are designated for residential uses and are
developed with those single family residences which compromise
Tract 10046. The property to the south of the subject site is
designated for residential uses and is currently developed with a
single family residence. The property to the west of the subject
site is designated for flood control purposes and is currently
developed with the Alta Loma flood control channel ;
d. The application has been submitted to allow the
deletion of the local equestrian trail easement from the rear
yard areas of Lots 2 , 3 and 4 of Tract 10046 to allow more usable
rear yard space and to provide greater privacy to the owners of
said lots;
e. The equestrian standards of the General Plan of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga provide that residential tracts
within the Equestrian Overlay District shall be developed with
local equestrian trails to allow lot owners safe and convenient
access from their lots to the community trail system. The
application as contemplated would not conform to the General Plan
absent express City approval of the placement of such local
equestrian trail easements;
f. The application as contemplated would
contradict the goals and objectives of both the General Plan and
Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and would
promote a detrimental condition to the persons and properties in
2
Resolution No. Page 3
the immediate vicinity of the subject site, for the reasons as
follows:
(i) The deletion of that portion of the
equestrian trail would force riders to traverse from the
equestrian trail to Evening Canyon Way in order to connect with
the community trail adjacent to Hillside Road. This route of
travel would subject those residents adjacent to Evening Canyon
Way to additional noise, odors and litter from horses traveling
adjacent to the front of such residences;
(ii) It is the goal of the General Plan that
local equestrian trails shall provide safe access from
residential lots to the community trail system of the City. By
forcing riders onto Evening Canyon Way, such riders would be
forced to compete with automobiles entering and existing Tract
10046 from Hillside Road. Such a situation would not only be
dangerous to horses and riders but would create a potential
hazardous traffic circulation pattern in and around the
intersection of Evening Canyon Way and Hillside Road;
(iii) It is one of the goals of the Equestrian
Overlays Zone to protect the ability to maintain horses on
residential lots within the zone. The deletion of the equestrian
trail would make difficult the provision of supplies and
equipment necessary for the keeping of horses by forcing such
deliveries through the front and side yard areas of those lots
referenced in the application.
g. Local equestrian trail easements are held in
common by all owners of residential lots within a given tract.
Accordingly, in addition to City approval, the deletion of the
local equestrian trail easement would require the approval and
consent of every lot owner within Tract 10046. At the above-
referenced public hearing of October 14, 1987 , several lot owners
within Tract 10046 spoke in opposition to the proposed
application and presented petitions from other lot owners in
opposition to the proposed application.
3 . Based on the substantial evidence presented to this
Commission during the above-referenced October 14 , 1987 hearing
and upon the specific findings of fact set forth in paragraphs 1
and 2 , above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as
follows:
3
Resolution No. Page 4
a. The application as proposed is not in
conformance with the goals and policies of the General Plan and
Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga;
b. The application as proposed will be detrimental
to the public health, safety or welfare and will be materially
injurious to properties and improvements in the immediate
vicinity; and,
c. The evidence presented to this Commission has
identified substantial potential adverse effects associated with
the request specified in the application.
4 . Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth
in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 , above, this Commission hereby denies
the application.
5 . The Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1987 .
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By•i� a44
Su :line R. Chiti Chairman
Attest: � �/
a.cul -r, r.T_"! ty Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the 10th day of November, 1987 , by the following vote-
to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK
NOES : COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS : MCNIEL
S\133\RESO 4