The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About91-64A - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 91-64A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 5, AMENDING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 10.09 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH AND WEST BY EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, ON THE EAST BY EXISTING OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-131-34 THROUGH 36, 52 THROUGH 54, AND 61. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application. " (ii) On August 28, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and also issued Resolution No. 91-63A recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. 91-02B, Subarea 7, be approved. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 28, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) Subarea 5 of the application applies to approximately 10.09 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, bordered on the north and west by Low Medium Residential designated land, on the east by existing Office/Professional designated land, on the south by Base Line Road as shown on Exhibit "Al, " and is presently vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) ; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low Medium Residential and is underdeveloped with a single family residence. The property to the east is designated Office/Professional and is vacant. The PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-64A ESPA 91-03, SUBAREA 5 - CITY OF R.C. August 28, 1991 Page 2 property to the south of Base Line Road is designated Medium Residential and is vacant. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the properties located in Subarea 5 of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and surrounding land use designations as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the north and west by the same land use designation; and (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Environmental Study and that the proposed designation would reduce the intensity of future residential development on the subject properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan by promoting the retention of Etiwanda's rural atmosphere through reduced residential densities. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that on the 28th day of August 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea 5, amending the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 10.09 acres of land bordered on the north and west by existing Low Medium Residential designated land, on the east by existing Office/Professional designated land, and on the south by Base Line Road, as shown in Exhibit "Al. " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-64A ESPA 91-03, SUBAREA 5 - CITY OF R.C. August 28, 1991 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF AUGUST 1991. PLANNING CO ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r BY: AO/'_ - ��_ I Larry Niel, Ch- 'rman Iry OOP ATTEST: �{�rf� ; iS Brae*_ ,wry I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of August 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE VICTORIA STREET ; liar 11Wi I .• / Mg V L III IIIMI LM _ �• : ousair l.•J.INaase:/.\sa:UI.1�C--- • IIIIIUJa ■ \ \\ \\ •,.;,.••\ �� a N..S \ . \ * s / • ri �� ` • 1 Eliwanda Specific Plan :1 la I:I 111:Ilill■1 �.;• Amendments 91-03 r. • ` ` 21 .. I Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan \ S • `\• Amendments 91-02 ei LM \\ LM • \ LM - District Designation 1 \ \\ PROPERTIES CURRENTLY \�\ a DESIGNATED MEDIUM \\ RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) UNDER HOP TO"LOWRMEDIUM RESIDENTIAL OP �`+ \ (4-8 DWELLING UNIT] PER ACRE) �`� \\ W 1 - ESPA Subarea Nos. S1! �� \ - FSPA Subarea Nos. i \E� 4x \�a I W V , : iIIIb' a & W • \\ \\'® \ \ \\\� 11:4/IN 1.1/7 e I N.0 omm. II 1141:1111111:1•11111t.:1 mmm u g is\''''ry NI -maim IIIIUI. • \' R . i • n.. R . Ill 9\ E U111111111111111P �\�\`i �z 1111111/ :� ...,. \ 1 ® pp1111I4 • Subarea r2 amended parcels CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: ESPA 91-03, FSPA 91-02 a_ PLANNING DIVISION TTTLE:Specific Plan Amend. Location Map - = EXHIBIT: •A1 SCALE: