HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-85 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 91-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-04,
REQUESTING TO AMEND THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN
TO MODIFY THE MEDIAN BREAK LOCATION ON FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD, TO ADD A MEDIAN BREAK LOCATION ON FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD, AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL FOR AN
AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 26 ACRES WITHIN THE FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 4) LOCATED ON THE EAST
SIDE OF INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A ±60 ACRE
RETAIL/COMMERCIAL CENTER LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND ETIWANDA
AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
229-031-03 THROUGH 13, 15, 16, AND 20.
A. Recitals.
(i) Foothill Marketplace Partners has initiated an application for
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 90-04 as described in the title
of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application. "
(ii) On June 26, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing on June 26, 1991, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The amendment pertains to a ±60 acre parcel of land located
on the south side of Foothill Boulevard Between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda
Avenue, with a street frontage of ±2,175 feet along Foothill Boulevard and
±600 feet along Etiwanda Avenue. The site is presently designated for
Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial uses and is developed with
single-family residences, a winery complex, and a converted gas station; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-85
FSPA 90-04 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS
June 26, 1991
Page 2
(b) The property to the north is designated for Commercial uses
and is improved with a mix of uses including a church, single-family
residences, retail stores, and a converted winery. The property to the south
is designated for Industrial uses and is developed with an industrial
business, is being developed with a water treatment facility, and is vacant.
The property to the east is designated for Commercial and Residential uses and
is vacant and developed with single-family residences. The property to the
west, opposite the Interstate 15 Freeway, is designated for Commercial uses
and is vacant; and
(c) This amendment will provide median locations necessary to
provide adequate circulation to serve the site while maintaining adequate
circulation for the yet underdeveloped parcels on the north side of Foothill
Boulevard; and
(d) This amendment will provide for a master planned commercial
development as was provided for with the adoption of the original Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan; and
(e) This amendment will change the zoning designation of an
Industrial parcel not originally considered part of a future, master planned,
commercial development. This parcel would, however, become a landlocked
property due to the existing development and developments under construction
to the south and east. The inclusion of this parcel in the master plan is in
keeping with the intent of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the
General Plan to provide a comprehensively planned area.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the amendment will provide for development of a
comprehensively planned urban community within the district that is superior
to the development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and
(b) That the amendment will provide for development within the
district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development and growth management policies of the City; and
(c) That the amendment will provide for the construction,
improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and
public services required by development within the district.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and
considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970
and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative
Declaration.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-85
FSPA 90-04 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS
June 26, 1991
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,
3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows:
(a) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City
Council approve and adopt Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment
No. 90-04, as attached in Exhibit "A. "
(b) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material
hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City
Council.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 1991.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: att./....
f
St.. I l
�t !
Lard, T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST: 1$11111;41:4&
1 11110,retary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, VALLETTE
F-
I i ydj
U oz
I. -- a o
1 I
• a
0 J
Z co
I
z w =
w o a
U
0 a o w ga m
I ❑ o U
Z . i a n
a
Q
• I �`� z
QD9d m 0 -
II O H
a�L \ p9 'o Q•o5P 'w\ 8 0
. (5 o J
i9 P 4ZU a 2 v.6 2 ! -- a
�1 J 66 ' •
k 4— --6 ... ,` 9d5O w
• I- --- annapeRn
u n t I gLiG Pa
Iii
--i__
_ _
r
tom. S _ _L_____ .
o
I
N_
N--1 1
ri
\\ .__11:10 ann. ____ __
—40-1;;c1.. Ca
\' :4
cy , \ .L . ___ ,-.7
. 1 •
o1
o �
• EXHIBIT A-1
■
. - \ U Z
0 °` a a
I.
s:
J
0.
. W
•
.).1:,,
N
3.
9- V
CI
Q : 3'„- am )� J
. �•
CI 'i
B
IT J W
r, •
••Av ••••••113 O < t
. 0 ¢
F
n W < 0 J
0 .i
co <) a Y
°C = a
V --- J K u. a < s m y
Elaa� o W 3 o u = ii 2IC1 1
a. 1-4
l . : V�
\ f e - _ J
<_
O
\.. W
O U
\, �'Sty \�` .. .. J J W
;oa W W J W i c a
4 0 < O
�Li 0 a
! : ! Q I W <
1 In 2 0 < x U I- J
1 1 a W Zigj Zi J < 'J
1 j T 2 1.- _ o O O O W 0 O
I. W W
`�. W O O
gRilitliji�-���G l 1l
IV-9.5T
EXHIBIT A-2