HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-109 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 91-109
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13808, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF FUTURE DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
229-021-10, 15, 19 & 28
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13808, submitted by Hughes
Investments, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 16 parcels, the
real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 229-021-10, 15, 19 & 28,
located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Future Day Creek
Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, on July 10, 1991, the Planning Commission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above-described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage or public
health problems or have adverse affects on abutting
properties.
SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970; and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 13808 is hereby approved
subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special
Conditions:
1. Pursuant to provisions of California Public
Resources Code Section 21089(b) , this application
shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will
building permits be issued or a map recorded, until
(1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the
associated environmental action is filed and posted
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109
TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
July 10, 1991
Page 2
with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the
County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all
required filing fees assessed pursuant to California
Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any
required handling charges, are paid to the County
Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The
applicant shall provide the Engineering Department
with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD
together with a receipt showing that all fees have
been paid.
In the event this application is determined exempt
from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of
the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines
promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any
required handling charge for filing a Certificate of
Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null
and void.
2. Provide necessary right-of-way and construct
Foothill Boulevard full width from Rochester Avenue
to Route 15. Sidewalk and parkway landscaping shall
be constructed along the south side of the street
from the centerline of Day Creek Channel to the
centerline of the Southern California Edison
Corridor on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard and
may be deferred for the remaining portion of the
'street until development of the adjacent property.
The limits of the off-site improvements may be
reduced if approved by the City Council.
3. Provide necessary right-of-way and construct Day
Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Way full width from Foothill
Boulevard to Rochester Avenue. The median island
shall extend from Foothill Boulevard to the north
side of the most southerly project driveway. The
street curb-to-curb width shall be increased by 2
feet (from 64 to 66 feet) to accommodate the median
within the Pioneer Way portion of the street.
Sidewalk and parkway landscaping may be deferred
until development of the adjacent property for the
portion west of the centerline of Day Creek Channel.
4. The developer shall be eligible for fee credit
against and reimbursement from the Transportation
Development Fees for the portion of the improvement
on Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek
Boulevard/Pioneer Way determined by the City
Engineer to be of supplemented size and length or
capacity over that needed for the impact of the
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109
TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
July 10, 1991
Page 3
development in conformance with City Policy. In
addition the developer may request a reimbursement
agreement to recover the cost of off-site street
improvements from future development of the adjacent
property for non-backbone improvements.
5. Construct drainage facilities as follows:
a. All facilities within Day Creek
Boulevard/Pioneer Way from Day Creek Channel to
north of Foothill Boulevard as necessary to
serve and protect the site; and
b. Reconstruct the existing channel parallel to the
Freeway as necessary, as approved by the City
Engineer.
6. Acquire easements and construct interim drainage
facilities as determined necessary in the final
drainage study to protect the site from flows from
the north or as otherwise approved by the City
Engineer.
7. Construct traffic signals at the intersections of
Foothill Boulevard with Day Creek Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue with Pioneer Way to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer
shall be eligible for fee credit against and
reimbursement from the Transportation Development
Fees for construction of the traffic signals beyond
those needed to mitigate the impacts of the
development in conformance with City policy.
8. Construct a traffic signal at the project's main
entrance on Day Creek Boulevard to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
9. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future
undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities
(electrical, except for 66 K.V. electrical) on the
opposite side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the
City prior to approval of Final Map or issuance of
building permits, whichever occurs first. The fee
shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times
the length from the center of the I-15 Freeway
right-of-way to the center of Day Creek Channel.
10. A temporary easement for a Foothill Boulevard detour
for the Day Creek Project shall be provided to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Improvements
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109
TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
July 10, 1991
Page 4
within this easement cannot be constructed until the
construction of the Bridge on Foothill Boulevard is
complete.
11. Landscaping within the area of concern for all
project intersections and driveways shall be
approved by the City Engineer.
12. Construct drainage facilities within Pioneer Way as
determined necessary by a Final Drainage Study
approved by the City Engineer considering the area
bounded by Pioneer Way, Rochester Avenue, Foothill
Boulevard and Day Creek Channel.
13. The maintenance of the parkway on the east side of
Day Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Way from the east side
of the Edison Corridor to Foothill Boulevard
including Lot "A" shall be the responsibility of the
shopping center. Lot "A" shall be included in
Parcel 11 or some other method shall be provided to
guarantee the perpetual maintenance and ownership of
Lot "A" as approved by the City Engineer and City
Attorney.
14. Approval from Southern California Edison shall be
provided for the construction of the service
driveway within their easement or provide proof to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City
Attorney that the driveway can be legally
constructed.
15. The service driveway on Foothill Boulevard shall be
35 feet in width as measured at the right-of-way
line.
16. The developer shall make a good faith effort to
acquire the required off-site property interests
necessary to construct the required public
improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so the
developer shall, at least 120 days prior to
submittal of the final map for approval, enter into
an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant
to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the
City acquires the property interests required for
the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for
payment by the developer of all costs incurred by
the City to acquire the off-site property interests
required in connection with the subdivision.
Security for a portion of these costs shall be in
the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an
appraisal report obtained by the developer, at
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109
TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
July 10, 1991
Page 5
developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been
approved by the City prior to commencement of the
appraisal.
17. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees
placed outside the public right-of-way shall be
dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto
private property.
18. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated
along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7
feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb
adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane,
a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be
provided.
19. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per
Engineering Public Works Standards shall be
submitted to the City Engineer for review and
approval prior to final map approval or issuance of
building permits, whichever occurs first. The
following landscaped areas are required to be
annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District:
a. Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard
Medians.
b. Foothill Boulevard and Pioneer Way parkways
adjacent to the Edison Corridors.
20. Parkway landscaping on Foothill Boulevard and Day
Creek Boulevard shall conform to the results of the
respective Beautification Master Plan.
21. Reciprocal parking shall be provided by CC&Rs.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF JULY 1991.
PLANNING COMM'-SIGN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: ail OF�l AtAf /
Larry T ..cNiel, Chairman
/
ATTEST: �ettr_j
Br.r't'e lgiretary
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109
TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
July 10, 1991
Page 6
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10th day of July 1991, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA
| I I I I raz £!! T! != _! !!!
ƒ 77 \ \ -� ��� !! ,- . ,.•
; )as
9 $3} - ` •- �! I,I ,! ; -
. � a •
\\ k �� !f § •-
! \ \ \ lit ■ || = - :. !� !
r " 4 ] 2%4 IP : i a �f ): }
k � \ \ 1 . ,�! . |g , 12 k
a e5 St II. Pi .; !I --
i 4$ tic) \ _e- a!! ! i �; , _ � x ! ,
. ! -� • -1 ■| : - s ! ; S
112 l - | | . 11-r -t� ;4 z:
C.. fit
�� � ` � ��' | | . i! „ _!
| t�- �. - _ !! ! �
-t il! \ \ \ 21110� . ! - �� .| |: !!
!- M� } __ }k! �k. ) 60 let! !|
- !/r -} §
N 1 e ` l N \I ). \[ \
■■■
14-7t�
� . f|k |!• 3.
■2: ,
| .. ` -! ` '
• § - i§! t •i !t. �!
- »6 | La f0 • .! .�
■ & ! 2 ' |!sf \ | k`! -,
i 0 " ' - ` •_; - :r.2 - §•
9 t: , \ ' ! �!!' � � 2 3! ;
�:
o e m C 7. 0 0
�I = °
O
c °u J V
y O p P
N .7., ,^ • O p C P C O 9 • . _p
V L O _ •
Li L .
ce
V u T G y- .462 125 2 g
cc
O'J V a_ ge _ r N
. oy�L a n L T j Y "
f y p y C
t a . p
6 u -
-0P _= e` w
0 u N ° O Y
"; p `°=
V N E C =2i;
C uyy p °_ .0 1 W O.I
N Q c V -„,,,s, V a u• °
• 1.11 m °- ° C 5, 2
Wig- = ALL -
p, .2 :' u •� 'l F
5- - u V •L - C v.
L.
� ° u d_ O Vu
L ,T, 5? ° y V N _ V c_-
2Z' - 1 l 2° _ - -0 0
I p O `Co ••• 00 _ P C el
•ts C N u " -u- Y- - - C 1 i L 4 u_ O L L V _C • O C V O
N
v N L
5.12 O V N _ u
-00 .O O J
N V L < ° VS <C . 6 < O O 1 ) S J L y
O VC LO ... CO \P
J J J
a - V 0 0 -. ■
2,Z • 22t c < < �0
" .;
C
LO OY N Co
- LC_
C Y
am- r∎ CC 9 8
teL Q. C a fi-
N■ C 1 u P WE
_ • L O I G L 6 u O eN I.
° °Y G NC L .2 01 Lu .. r V' V E W J� ice L v.
24,A Vp O O=G t.,-; ♦ vr Y = 4 4 - Q C C a �p " " ay °aE • =
• •
al am
iiL \ L•E L o Y u Y O y Y 4. 0'+ " L t �y
a$ i _ ° Ngg �� L ° fi« g8
F5� °fi N
C C N Y •
o
P NL NO _O _
O s - '; • CO _
2-` Y ."i 0. 'ACC ACC yp � V _
.e Ov` o g— _ J.. J...� p Y� Jy
o .` • L L
a '�• °� L ° c �e �eg �� a Cu
E ° 3 ] E1 _ aE y_ ByE •" sp 3 1.� 5
Y ` J J ` N\ 1�L 1 Y C J Y Y e 1 C ) - C12 y r j p
O—L g f `N b.` " xb ., Per °;E �E3 '! n- e� CO o L = V G L 2 ° : !- O < 8 o a i V
;I \ \ \ , -i\ \ \