Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-109 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 91-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13808, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-021-10, 15, 19 & 28 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13808, submitted by Hughes Investments, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 16 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 229-021-10, 15, 19 & 28, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Future Day Creek Boulevard; and WHEREAS, on July 10, 1991, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970; and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 13808 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 1. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b) , this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109 TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 2 with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 2. Provide necessary right-of-way and construct Foothill Boulevard full width from Rochester Avenue to Route 15. Sidewalk and parkway landscaping shall be constructed along the south side of the street from the centerline of Day Creek Channel to the centerline of the Southern California Edison Corridor on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard and may be deferred for the remaining portion of the 'street until development of the adjacent property. The limits of the off-site improvements may be reduced if approved by the City Council. 3. Provide necessary right-of-way and construct Day Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Way full width from Foothill Boulevard to Rochester Avenue. The median island shall extend from Foothill Boulevard to the north side of the most southerly project driveway. The street curb-to-curb width shall be increased by 2 feet (from 64 to 66 feet) to accommodate the median within the Pioneer Way portion of the street. Sidewalk and parkway landscaping may be deferred until development of the adjacent property for the portion west of the centerline of Day Creek Channel. 4. The developer shall be eligible for fee credit against and reimbursement from the Transportation Development Fees for the portion of the improvement on Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Way determined by the City Engineer to be of supplemented size and length or capacity over that needed for the impact of the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109 TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 3 development in conformance with City Policy. In addition the developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of off-site street improvements from future development of the adjacent property for non-backbone improvements. 5. Construct drainage facilities as follows: a. All facilities within Day Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Way from Day Creek Channel to north of Foothill Boulevard as necessary to serve and protect the site; and b. Reconstruct the existing channel parallel to the Freeway as necessary, as approved by the City Engineer. 6. Acquire easements and construct interim drainage facilities as determined necessary in the final drainage study to protect the site from flows from the north or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 7. Construct traffic signals at the intersections of Foothill Boulevard with Day Creek Boulevard and Rochester Avenue with Pioneer Way to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer shall be eligible for fee credit against and reimbursement from the Transportation Development Fees for construction of the traffic signals beyond those needed to mitigate the impacts of the development in conformance with City policy. 8. Construct a traffic signal at the project's main entrance on Day Creek Boulevard to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical, except for 66 K.V. electrical) on the opposite side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to approval of Final Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of the I-15 Freeway right-of-way to the center of Day Creek Channel. 10. A temporary easement for a Foothill Boulevard detour for the Day Creek Project shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Improvements PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109 TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 4 within this easement cannot be constructed until the construction of the Bridge on Foothill Boulevard is complete. 11. Landscaping within the area of concern for all project intersections and driveways shall be approved by the City Engineer. 12. Construct drainage facilities within Pioneer Way as determined necessary by a Final Drainage Study approved by the City Engineer considering the area bounded by Pioneer Way, Rochester Avenue, Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Channel. 13. The maintenance of the parkway on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Way from the east side of the Edison Corridor to Foothill Boulevard including Lot "A" shall be the responsibility of the shopping center. Lot "A" shall be included in Parcel 11 or some other method shall be provided to guarantee the perpetual maintenance and ownership of Lot "A" as approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. 14. Approval from Southern California Edison shall be provided for the construction of the service driveway within their easement or provide proof to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney that the driveway can be legally constructed. 15. The service driveway on Foothill Boulevard shall be 35 feet in width as measured at the right-of-way line. 16. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109 TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 5 developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 17. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 18. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 19. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: a. Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard Medians. b. Foothill Boulevard and Pioneer Way parkways adjacent to the Edison Corridors. 20. Parkway landscaping on Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan. 21. Reciprocal parking shall be provided by CC&Rs. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF JULY 1991. PLANNING COMM'-SIGN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ail OF�l AtAf / Larry T ..cNiel, Chairman / ATTEST: �ettr_j Br.r't'e lgiretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109 TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 6 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of July 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA | I I I I raz £!! T! != _! !!! ƒ 77 \ \ -� ��� !! ,- . ,.• ; )as 9 $3} - ` •- �! I,I ,! ; - . � a • \\ k �� !f § •- ! \ \ \ lit ■ || = - :. !� ! r " 4 ] 2%4 IP : i a �f ): } k � \ \ 1 . ,�! . |g , 12 k a e5 St II. Pi .; !I -- i 4$ tic) \ _e- a!! ! i �; , _ � x ! , . ! -� • -1 ■| : - s ! ; S 112 l - | | . 11-r -t� ;4 z: C.. fit �� � ` � ��' | | . i! „ _! | t�- �. - _ !! ! � -t il! \ \ \ 21110� . ! - �� .| |: !! !- M� } __ }k! �k. ) 60 let! !| - !/r -} § N 1 e ` l N \I ). \[ \ ■■■ 14-7t� � . f|k |!• 3. ■2: , | .. ` -! ` ' • § - i§! t •i !t. �! - »6 | La f0 • .! .� ■ & ! 2 ' |!sf \ | k`! -, i 0 " ' - ` •_; - :r.2 - §• 9 t: , \ ' ! �!!' � � 2 3! ; �: o e m C 7. 0 0 �I = ° O c °u J V y O p P N .7., ,^ • O p C P C O 9 • . _p V L O _ • Li L . ce V u T G y- .462 125 2 g cc O'J V a_ ge _ r N . oy�L a n L T j Y " f y p y C t a . p 6 u - -0P _= e` w 0 u N ° O Y "; p `°= V N E C =2i; C uyy p °_ .0 1 W O.I N Q c V -„,,,s, V a u• ° • 1.11 m °- ° C 5, 2 Wig- = ALL - p, .2 :' u •� 'l F 5- - u V •L - C v. L. � ° u d_ O Vu L ,T, 5? ° y V N _ V c_- 2Z' - 1 l 2° _ - -0 0 I p O `Co ••• 00 _ P C el •ts C N u " -u- Y- - - C 1 i L 4 u_ O L L V _C • O C V O N v N L 5.12 O V N _ u -00 .O O J N V L < ° VS <C . 6 < O O 1 ) S J L y O VC LO ... CO \P J J J a - V 0 0 -. ■ 2,Z • 22t c < < �0 " .; C LO OY N Co - LC_ C Y am- r∎ CC 9 8 teL Q. C a fi- N■ C 1 u P WE _ • L O I G L 6 u O eN I. ° °Y G NC L .2 01 Lu .. r V' V E W J� ice L v. 24,A Vp O O=G t.,-; ♦ vr Y = 4 4 - Q C C a �p " " ay °aE • = • • al am iiL \ L•E L o Y u Y O y Y 4. 0'+ " L t �y a$ i _ ° Ngg �� L ° fi« g8 F5� °fi N C C N Y • o P NL NO _O _ O s - '; • CO _ 2-` Y ."i 0. 'ACC ACC yp � V _ .e Ov` o g— _ J.. J...� p Y� Jy o .` • L L a '�• °� L ° c �e �eg �� a Cu E ° 3 ] E1 _ aE y_ ByE •" sp 3 1.� 5 Y ` J J ` N\ 1�L 1 Y C J Y Y e 1 C ) - C12 y r j p O—L g f `N b.` " xb ., Per °;E �E3 '! n- e� CO o L = V G L 2 ° : !- O < 8 o a i V ;I \ \ \ , -i\ \ \