HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-127 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 91-127
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 1,
AMENDING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR
APPROXIMATELY 27.89 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE
NORTHWEST BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE EAST BY
ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING COMMERCIAL
DESIGNATED LAND BORDERING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05,
09, 10, 15, 20, AND 29.
A. Recitals.
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for
Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific
Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application. "
(ii) On August 28, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and also issued Resolution No. 91-126, recommending to the City Council that
the associated General Plan Amendment No. 91-02B, Subarea 3, be denied.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on August 28, 1991, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) Subarea 1 of the application applies to approximately 27.89
acres of land, basically a triangular configuration, bordered on the northwest
by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on the east by Etiwanda Avenue and existing Low
Medium Residential designated land, and on the south by Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan (FSP) Regional Related Commercial and Community Commercial
designated land bordering Foothill Boulevard as shown on Exhibit "Al, " and is
presently underdeveloped with a single family residence in the northeastern
portion. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14
dwelling units per acre) ; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-127
ESP 91-03, SUBAREA 1 - CITY OF R.C.
August 28, 1991
Page 2
(b) The property to the northwest of the subject site is
designated freeway and is the Ontario (I-15) Freeway. The properties to the
east are designated Low Medium Residential and are underdeveloped with single
family residences and on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue it is designated
Medium Residential. The properties to the south are designated FSP Regional
Related Commercial and Community Commercial and are partially developed with
mixed business activities.
(c) This amendment may conflict with the Land Use Policies of
the General Plan and of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and may not provide for
development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
(d) This amendment may not promote the goals and objectives of
the Land Use Element; and
(e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact
on the environment nor the surrounding properties, but land use
incompatibilities may result.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the properties located in Subarea 1 of the application
are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are
incompatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by
the site's being bordered on the northwest by the 1-15 freeway; and
(b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the
findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Environmental
Study, but that land use incompatibilities may result; and
(c) That the proposed amendment may not be in conformance with
the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan due to the potential of
establishing incompatible land use relationships with single family uses and
significant vehicular traffic of the adjacent freeway.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed
and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970. However, this Commission does not recommend issuance of a Negative
Declaration because the land use change may not promote the goals and
objectives of the General Plan.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that on the 28th day of
August 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends denial of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea 1.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-127
ESP 91-03, SUBAREA 1 - CITY OF R.C.
August 28, 1991
Page 3
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF AUGUST 1991.
PLANNING COMM/'SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: e� AA.. /IL S .mil
OPIr =rry T. McNiel, Chairman
•
ATTEST: -- WI/_!' it
Brad -riartary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of August 1991, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, VALLETTE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
Ed YICTORIA ITREET ""
', ■111■■u
in I
LM
c >vnarlw:l.■a.teaaa•�a.ucur.nc--. -
_ _ um _ - \�`� .i um
r ' m \. \� C O M.
\ rte.
cros .�O\\`� Etiwanda Specific Plan
I,ILru oast a
�F Amendments 91-03
rillMil \\` I Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan
VI
\� t, :
\`� \\\\ Amendments 91-02
iv LM - District Designation
\ x PROPERTIES CURRENTLY
\"' DESIGNATED MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM(8-14 DWELLING
UNITS P ACRE)CON IDERATIION FORNREDESIGNATION
OP \� TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
OP , ,y \ W 1 (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)
`4. - ESPA Subarea Nos.
S�' . \\ W - FSPA Subarea Nos.la
\ �• ss•.a.111 —
illll.I W 0 eIN
\ \ \\\\\:
%,\�\�o\\o \ \ \\
\. \\ \ a r® r-
\ \ I
R omm. "1.,,,,,,:',..\ 2 \44,' II
90I71I■:1rllIU .:r •�
111111 "'
K11111111111111111
° 111111111Q ;\\,\ r
==uuIII %
Subarea 2 amended parcels
CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAONGA
ITEM: ESPA 91-03, FSPA 91-02
M
PLANNING DIVISION TITLE:specific Plan Amend. Location Map - _
0
EXHIBIT: •A1• SCALE: