The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About91-129 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 91-129 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 3, AMENDING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 30.72 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTHWEST BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE EAST BY EAST AVENUE AND EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY MILLER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-041-04 THROUGH 10, 1100-051-03, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, AND PORTIONS OF 1100-071-01 AND 02. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application. " (ii) On August 28, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and also issued Resolution No. 91-128, recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. 91-028, Subarea 5, be denied. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 28, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) Subarea 3 of the application applies to approximately 30.72 acres of land, basically a linear configuration, bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on the east by East Avenue and existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on the south by Miller Avenue, as shown on Exhibit "Al, " and is presently underdeveloped with three single family residences in the southwestern portion. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) ; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-129 ESPA 91-03, SUBAREA 3 - CITY OF R.C. August 28, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the northwest of the subject site is designated freeway and is the Ontario (I-15) Freeway. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and is underdeveloped with single family residences facing Miller Avenue and on the opposite side of East Avenue it is designated Office (OFC) in the City of Fontana's West End Specific Plan. The property to the south on the opposite side of Miller Avenue is designated Medium Residential and is vacant. (c) This amendment may conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and may not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment may not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties, but land use incompatibilities may result. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the properties located in Subarea 3 of the application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are incompatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the northwest by the I-15 freeway; and (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Environmental Study, but that land use incompatibilities may result; and (c) That the proposed amendment may not be in conformance with the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan due to the potential of establishing incompatible land use relationships with single family uses and significant vehicular traffic of the adjacent freeway. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. However, this Commission does not recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration because the land use change may not promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that on the 28th day of August 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends denial of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea 3. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-129 ESPA 91-03, SUBAREA 3 - CITY OF R.C. August 28, 1991 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF AUGUST 1991. PLANNING CO ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ir BY: Sit Alf Larr T McNiel, •-irman ATTEST: Aezi?nii, __At- BrIllrerilipirtary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of August 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, VALLETTE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • VICTORIA STREET I al ii �` L = , VL L M - / IN La =■ . \ \\��\..•IIM Q� / C#14 Li ■ '. a %•m. L' ' aQ\\`� Etiwanda Specific Plan :11.121 Lia:%ni∎ . _do I Amendments 91-03 \;. •� \\` I Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan i \ \• Amendments 91-02 LM \ LM \\ \\ LM - District Designation \ ‘ ' PROPERTIES CURRENTLY "" DESIGNATED MEDIUM s RESIDENTIAL 18-14 DWELLING \• \, UNITS PER ACRE) UNDER OP CONSIDERATION RESIDENTIALNATION \' (4-8 DWELLING UNIT PER ACRE) OP 1E.\y \\ 1 - ESPA Subarea Nos.ia, /<0"5,'\\ \\\' ' a - FSPA Subarea Nos. V IIIIIIIIII. ■� W 4■ \ \ N \ ,..0 � � o _ ® m ..� 111... \ o\\ \ - - -- \\• \\\\,2 Vat;V 1 ' I R al olnm. c�. \ �I•1 901711U:h1llp .:. 'a 1111111)/ +.:.\�'` . 0 (.'t!: :' Rel 11111W WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIU® cm 1111111 \ \\\\\ p= 11111 • Subarea 2 amended parcels CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM' ESPA 91-03, FSPA 91-02 — PLANNING DIVISION Plan Amend. Location Map = N EXHIBIT: 'Al" SCALE: