HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-16 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 92-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-01, AMENDING
FIGURE 5-18 AND FIGURES 5-20 THROUGH 5-40 REGARDING
CERTAIN TRAIL ROUTES AND AMENDING ARTICLE 5.33.200
REGARDING COMMUNITY TRAILS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has initiated an application for
Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 92-01 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Amendment is
referred to as "the application. "
(ii) On January 22, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on January 22, 1992, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application pertains to the area included in the
Etiwanda Area Specific Plan; and
(b) This amendment will modify certain trail routes for
consistency with the Trails Implementation Plan; and
(c) This amendment will provide consistency with the General
Plan Master Plan of Trails.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the amendment will provide for development of a
comprehensively planned urban community within the district that is superior
to the development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 92-16
ESPA 92-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
January 22, 1992
Page 2
(b) That the amendment will provide for development within the
district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development and growth management policies of the City; and
(c) That the amendment will provide for the construction,
improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and
public services required by development within the district.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed
and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows:
(a) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City
Council approve and adopt Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 92-01,
modifying Figure 5-18 as shown in the attached Exhibit "A", modifying the
related street cross sections Figures 5-20 through 5-40 accordingly and
modifying Article 5.33.200 as shown in the attached Exhibit "B. "
(b) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the
City Council.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 1992.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r
BY: ��L/.� .._ S
arry a McNiel, Chairman/
ATTEST: L L- 4
Bra I ', r y
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of January 1992, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
00000 ...unnnnu
K.
•
sern srnEEr I
4! —�_
nmumn . iiiiii iiii:• nniamimgmmm�lim m mnq�wwnnnnnnnnnmunn •••� mmuuum
mnummn timmumnmm
• j
II _
0.1 SU1AA SAVE S ,:
••' /I tone
• ROUTE 30 /
n r
l� i —_- .j ,n„..... Als ea. AVE
,A. ORIA r i 1 ,•ARK L 1/
80
•
•
•
I
rte ,,,,Imnmm _____J a
I
Equestrian Trails
of
l'n mraluma Bike Lane* or Bike Route*
AVE
(On Pavement Shoulder)
/ / -mm , Bike Path (In Parkway)
1.
Foothill Boulevard 7(
a l ' ° Specific Plan
- . Consult Trail Implementation Plan
•W �% title figure,
� � I COMMUNITY 5 - 18
' ' . TRAILS j
-- ,A
,A os&O — X u r ' s'
5.33 TRAILS AND WALKWAYS
.100 Intent
It is the intent of this article to provide appropriate standards
for the development of an integrated and continuous system
of pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian trails and walkways
consisting of:
- Community maintained Community Trails,
- Privately maintained Feeder Trails and
Greenways, and
- Publicly maintained Public Sidewalks.
.200 Community Trails
.201 Community Equestrian Trails shall be developed in
locations specified in Figure 5-18. Design Standards
shall be consistent with Citywide standards as
contained in the Trail Implementation Plan.
.202 Community Bicycle Trail Improvements shall be
developed in locations specified in Figure 5-18. Such
bicycle trail improvements shall be consistent with
street cross-sections, Fig. 5-20 through 5-40. Design
Standards shall be consistent with Citywide standards
as contained in the Trail Implementation Plan.
.203 Community Hiking Trail Improvements shall be
provided in locations specified in Figure 5-19. Design
Standards shall be consistent with Citywide standards
as contained in the Trail Implementation Plan. No
hiking trail improvements shall be necessary where
used in conjunction with equestrian trail
improvements.
"
5-33 tg / /13J T ,t3 ',
, Article 5.33 - Trails 6t Walkways
.300 Feeder Trails
.301 Feeder Trails:
Feeder trails for equestrian use shall be required as a
condition of project approval in the EQ/OL District.
Such trails shall be located within easements, and
shall be designed to provide access to each lot or site
intended for equestrian use.
.302 Design Criteria:
At a minimum, each development should provide at
least one connection across the project site, with the
intention of providing a continuous system of
equestrian Feeder Trails. The design of such trails
shall be based on Citywide Feeder Trail standards,
provided that such trails may be combined with
optional provisions for bicycle and pedestrian use, per
Section .400 below.
I.
5-34