No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-85 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 93-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-36 FOR A 2,000 SQUARE FOOT CLEANER/TAILOR LOCATED IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, AND 26 THROUGH 28. A. Recitals. (i) Masi Commerce Center Partners has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-36, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application. " (ii) On the 22nd day of September 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 22, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Rochester and Foothill with a street frontage of 1,250 feet along Foothill Boulevard and lot depth of 950 feet along Rochester Boulevard and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of the site consists of the Sports Complex, the property to the east is the Aggozzotti Winery, and the property to the west is vacant; and (c) The property is designated "Industrial Park" by the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and (d) The proposed use is conditionally permitted in Subarea 7 and is classified as a "Convenience Sales and Service. " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 93-85 CUP 93-36 - MASI PARTNERS September 22, 1993 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Division 1) Tenant improvement plans shall be submitted to the Building and Safety and Planning Divisions as well as the Fire District for review and approval prior to occupancy. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and all other City ordinances. 3) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, including but not limited to noise, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of the use. 4) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the Uniform Sign Program for the complex. • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 93-85 CUP 93-36 - MASI PARTNERS September 22, 1993 Page 3 5) Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if the building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 6) A copy of this Resolution shall be attached to any lease for this space. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1993. PLANNING CO ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: at A.'... ��� arr. McNiel, Chairman i ATTEST: Ai _______ Br Iarercretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of September 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY