Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-65 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 94-65 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVOKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-45, THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A STRESS REDUCTION CLINIC WITHIN AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 6) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 8645 HAVEN AVENUE, SUITE 550, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-144-54. A. Recitals. 1. Debra Hildenbrand filed an application for approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-45 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application. " 2. The application was approved by the Planning Commission on November 10, 1993, subject to certain conditions of approval as contained within Resolution No. 93-96. 3. On May 25, 1994, the Planning Commission conducted a periodic review of the application. The Planning Commission determined that sufficient evidence was presented to demonstrate that the application was operating in violation of the conditions of approval. 4. On the 13th day of July 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 13, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to leased space on a property located on the east side of Haven Avenue, at 8645 Haven Avenue, Suite 550, which is partially developed with a multi-tenant industrial park; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-65 CUP 93-45 - HILDENBRAND July 13, 1994 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated for industrial uses and is vacant, the property to the south and east are designated for industrial uses and are developed with warehouse/manufacturing buildings, and the property to the west is designated for industrial uses and is vacant; and c. The application, as approved, proposed various stress reduction techniques including light therapy, aroma therapy, relaxation breathing exercises, stretching, and sensory deprivation; and d. Section 9.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishes the requirements under which Massage Establishment Permits may be allowed and the requirements for Massage Technician Permits. Because the application did not meet the requirements of Section 9.24, a condition of approval was placed on the application prohibiting massage from being conducted on the premises; and e. Based upon information received that massage was being performed at the subject property in violation of the conditions of approval, an investigation was conducted by the Police Department to review activities being conducted at the site; and f. An undercover operator was sent to the site as part of the investigation of the business activity; and g. After being in the establishment, the operator was offered massage for money, in violation of the conditions of approval for the application; and h. As a result of the Police investigation, arrests were made at the applicant's business for prostitution and drug possession; and i. Massage establishments may be permitted in only the General Commercial designation subject to review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The application is located in the Industrial Park designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Massage establishments are prohibited within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Therefore, the use is not consistent with the intent of the zoning designation in which the site is located; and j . Because the applicant is prohibited by the conditions of approval from conducting massage and the proper modifications to the Conditional Use Permit and Massage Permits were not obtained, the use is in violation of the Municipal Code Requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-65 CUP 93-45 - HILDENBRAND July 13, 1994 Page 3 b. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. That the proposed use does not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby revokes Conditional Use Permit 93-45. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY 1994. PLAN' C' : ON OF THE ' •F RANCHO CUCAMONGA --411. �/���a��� BY: lig E. D.• id : !- ATTEST: - / '' Brad, lir I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of July 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE