HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-12 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 97-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 96-03, A REQUEST TO
AMEND THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 12.4 ACRES OF LAND SOUTH OF
HIGHLAND AVENUE AND EAST OF WOODRUFF PLACE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 227-011-26.
A. Recitals.
1. Citation Homes has filed an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No.
96-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victoria
Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On February 26, 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on February 26, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 12.4 acres of land, basically a reverse "L"
shaped configuration, located south of Highland Avenue and east of Woodruff Place and which is
presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Medium Residential; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential
within the Caryn Planned Community and the property is developed with single family residences.
Immediately to the north is the right-of-way for the future Foothill Freeway, which is presently vacant.
The property to the west is designated Village Commercial and developed with a neighborhood
commercial shopping center. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential and
is developed with a single family residential subdivision. The property to the south is designated
Low-Medium Residential and is developed with a neighborhood park and an elementary school.
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element;
and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97-12
VCPA 96-03 - CITATION HOMES
February 26, 1997
Page 2
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district
in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff
reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in
Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 96-03.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1997.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97-12
VCPA 96-03 - CITATION HOMES
February 26, 1997
Page 3
es` s'
a 1
BY: .�►�a\!T. lin
w' E. •:vid :rker, • airma
ATTEST: � i/
rr,r, Secr> ary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 26th day of February 1997, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE