HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-34 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 14-34
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION
DRC2014-00471, A REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DURATION OF AN
EXISTING ENTITLEMENT APPROVAL BY AN ADDITIONAL TWO (2)
YEARS FOR DRC2007-00657, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHW EST CORNER
OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD WITHIN THE
MIXED USE DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD OVERLAY; AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0207-113-23 AND 24.
A. Recitals.
1. RC 66 Plaza filed application DRC2014-00471 for the extension of the duration of the
entitlement approval ("time extension") for Development Review DRC2007-00657 as described in
the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject time extension request is
referred to as "the application."
2. On July 8, 2009, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 09-26, thereby approving
the application subject to specific conditions and time limits.
3. On August 27, 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on August 27, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The applicant does not propose any changes to the original project in conjunction
with this time extension request; and
b. The previously approved Development Review is in substantial compliance with the
City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and
C. The extension of the approval of the Development Review will not cause significant
inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, or policies;
and
d. The extension of the approval of the Development Review will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-34
DRC2014-00471 — RC 66 PLAZA
August 27, 2014
Page 2
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all
written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning
Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and
approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local
CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission determined that the original project was categorically
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's
CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (c) (New Construction) in
connection with the City's approval of Development Review DRC2007-00657 on July 8, 2009.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review
is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No changes
are proposed to the project; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under
which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts;
and no new important information shows that the project will have new or more severe impacts than
previously considered. There are no changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the
project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated when concluding the
project was categorically exempt. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more
significant effects not analyzed in the previous environmental review, and will not have more severe
effects than previously analyzed. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA,staff recommends that the Planning
Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required
in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2014-00471.
b. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission
concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to
CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Time Extension DRC2014-00471 for
Development Review DRC2007-00657.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2,and 3 above,this
Commission hereby extends the duration of an existing entitlement approval by an additional two(2)
years and modifies the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 09-26 and to read as
follows:
Planning Department
1) Approval is for the extension of the duration of the entitlement approval
(Time Extension DRC2014-00471) for Development Review
DRC2007-00657 and modification of the applicable approval time limit
as described in Resolution No. 09-26 that was adopted by the Planning
Commission on July 8, 2009.
2) The time extension of the entitlement approval is for two(2)years. The
new expiration date for Development Review DRC2007-00657 is
July 8, 2016.
3) Any requests for future time extensions shall be subject to the
procedures, conditions,and findings as set forth in Section 17.14.090 of
the Development Code.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-34
DRC2014-00471 — RC 66 PLAZA
August 27, 2014
Page 3
4) All other prior conditions of approval, including all of the
Standard/special conditions of approval from other City departments for
Development Review DRC2007-00657(Resolution 09-26)shall apply.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
rances How yshell, Chairman
ATTEST: C;A� ���
Candyce B t
ft, Secretary
I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 27th day of August 2014, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE