HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-35 - ResolutionsRESOLUTION NO. 14-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION
DRC2014-00623, A REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DURATION OF AN
EXISTING ENTITLEMENT APPROVAL BY AN ADDITIONAL TWO (2)
YEARS FOR DRC2008-00462, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD WITHIN THE
MIXED USE DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD OVERLAY; AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0207-113-23 AND 24.
FA�ZTZ an
1. RC 66 Plaza filed an application DRC2014-00623 for the extension of the duration of the
entitlement approval ("time extension") for Variance DRC2008-00462 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject time extension request is referred to as "the
application."
2. On July 8, 2009, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 09-27, thereby approving
the application subject to specific conditions and time limits.
3. On August 27, 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above -referenced public hearing on August 27, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The applicant does not propose any changes to the original project in conjunction
with this time extension request; and
b. The previously approved Variance is in substantial compliance with the City's
current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and
C. The extension of the approval of the Variance will not cause significant
inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, or policies;
and
d. The extension of the approval of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-35
DRC2014-00623 — RC 66 PLAZA
August 27, 2014
Page 2
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all
written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning
Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and
approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local
CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission determined that the original project was categorically
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's
CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (A) (Minor Alterations in Land
Use Limitations) in connection with the City's approval of Variance DRC2008-00462 on July 8, 2009.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental environmental
review is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No
changes are proposed to the project; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances
under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental
impacts; and no new important information shows that the project will have new or more severe
impacts than previously considered. There are no changes to the project or the circumstances
surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated when
concluding the project was categorically exempt. Staff further finds that the project will not have one
or more significant effects not analyzed in the previous environmental review, and will not have more
severe effects than previously analyzed. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the
Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is
required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2014-00623.
b. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission
concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to
CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Time Extension DRC2014-00623 for
Variance DRC2008-00462.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this
Commission hereby extends the duration of an existing entitlement approval by an additional two (2)
years and modifies the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 09-27 to read as follows:
Planning Department
1) Approval is for the extension of the duration of the entitlement approval
(Time Extension DRC2014-00623) for Variance DRC2008-00462, and
modification of the applicable approval time limit as described in
Resolution No. 09-27 that was adopted by the Planning Commission
on July 8, 2009.
2) The time extension of the entitlement approval is for two (2) years. The
new expiration date for Variance DRC2008-00462 is July 8, 2016.
3) Any requests for future time extensions shall be subject to the
procedures, conditions, and findings as set forth in Section 17.14.090 of
the Development Code.
4) All other prior conditions of approval, including all of the
Standard/special conditions of approval from other City departments for
Variance DRC2008-00462 (Resolution 09-27), shall apply.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-35
DRC2014-00623 — RC 66 PLAZA
August 27, 2014
Page 3
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: A� , dw,
France�so-wbyslhell, Chairman
ATTEST: &" �
Can ce ur ett, Secretary
I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 27th day of August 2014, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE