HomeMy WebLinkAbout15-17 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 15-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL
PERMIT DRC2013-00942, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 45 TREES IN
CONNECTION WITH A DESIGN REVIEW (DRC2013-00583) FOR A SITE
PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW OF A 13-UNIT DETACHED CONDOMINIUM
PROJECT ON 2.17 ACRES IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT(4-8 DWELLING UNITS PERACRE) FOR A SITE LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF
MONTE VISTA STREET—APN: 202-131-27, 61 AND 62
A. Recitals.
1. Creative Design Associates has filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal
Permit DRC2013-00942 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 11th day of February 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on February 11, 2015, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to a property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue
and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and
b. The 2.17 acre site is comprised of three parcels and slopes gently to the southeast.
The site contains 45 trees of various species and the remnants of a stone lined drainage channel.
The adjacent mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the
site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern boundary of the site; and
C. To the north and west is a mobile home park within the Low Medium (LM)
Residential District. To the south are single-family residences within the Medium (M) Development
District: and, to the east, across Archibald Avenue, is a multi-family project within the Medium (M)
Residential District; and
d. A Tree Removal Permit has been submitted for the removal of 45 trees related to
the design review of a 13-unit detached condominium project(DRC2013-00583).An Arborist Report
was completed for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 (John Gonzalez; May 17, 2005) which
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-17
DRC2013-00942
CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES
FEBRUARY 11, 2015
Page 2
reviewed the condition of each tree on the project site. The report concluded that all but 6 trees were
in poor condition and should be removed. The report also stated that the 6 trees that were classified
as being in fair to good condition should be considered for preservation if they did not conflict with
the proposed onsite improvements. The layout of the project prevents preserving these 6 trees
healthy trees; and
e. The Development Code requires that new developments plant 40 trees per acre, of
which 90-percent must be 15-gallon size trees and 10-percent must be 24-inch box size trees. The
proposed Landscape Plan includes 92 new trees, 5 trees in excess of the minimum requirement,of
which 43 percent will be 24-inch box size trees.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1
and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The removal of the trees is necessary due to the condition of the trees related to
disease, danger of collapse, proximity to an existing structure, or interference with utility services.
The Arborist Report prepared for the project on May 17, 2005 concluded that all but 6 of the trees
are in poor condition and should be removed. The required grading and site layout prevent
preserving the 6 healthy trees.
b. The removal of the trees is necessary in order to construct improvements which will
allow economic enjoyment of the property. The trees conflict with the construction of onsite
improvements related to the development of the proposed 13-unit multi-family development.
C. The removal of the trees will not negatively impact the neighborhood, the
established character of the area and property values. There are a large number of mature trees in
the surrounding area. The removal of the onsite trees will have a minimal impact on the surrounding
area as the 45 trees slated for removal will be mitigated by the number of trees that will be planted
as part of the project. The Development Code requires that new developments plant 40 trees per
acre, of which 90-percent must be 15-gallon size trees and 10-percent must be 24-inch box size
trees. The Landscape Plan for the project includes 92 new trees, 5 trees in excess of the minimum
requirement, of which 43 percent will be 24-inch box size trees.
d. The removal of the trees is necessary to construct required improvements within
the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way. There are fourtrees to be
removed are within the public right-of-way that will replaced by new street trees.
e. The trees cannot be preserved through pruning and proper maintenance or
relocation. All but 6 of the trees slated for removal have been determined by the Arborist Report to
be in poor condition. The 6 healthy trees conflict with the proposed onsite improvements.
f. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource in the city.All but 6 of the
trees are in poor condition. The trees will be replaced as part of the project with a greater number of
trees.
g. Removal of the trees in not restricted by a Specific Plan, Community Plan, condition
of approval, or designation as a Historic Landmark.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-17
DRC2013-00942
CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES
FEBRUARY 11, 2015
Page 3
h. Every effort has been made to incorporate the trees into the design of the project
and the only appropriate alternative is the removal of the trees. The condition of the trees and the
proposed site and grading plans prevent maintaining the trees in their present location or from
relocating the trees on site.
i. The removal of the trees will not have a negative impact on the health, safety, or
viability of surrounding trees, nor will it negatively impact the aesthetics or general welfare of the
surrounding area. Only 6 of the 45 trees slated for removal have been determined to be healthy.Any
negative impact created by the removal of the 6 healthy trees will be mitigated by the 92 new trees
that will be planted as part of the project.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all
written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application,the Planning
Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and
approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local
CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007 in
connection with the City's approval of SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162,
no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with
subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are
proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)substantial
changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that
indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the
project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or(iv)additional mitigation
measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to
substantially reduce impacts.
b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Tree Removal Permit
DRC2013-00942, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the
project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in
the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The general layout and number of units have not
changed from the original environmental determination. Staff further finds that the project will not
have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration,
not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation
measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant, as
the project layout and design have not changed since the original environmental determination.
C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission
concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to
CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the current application.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-17
DRC2013-00942
CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES
FEBRUARY 11, 2015
Page 4
Planning Department
1) Approval is for the removal of 45 trees related to the development of a
13 unit detached condominium project located on the west side of
Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN:
202-131-27, 61 and 62.
2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections
of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform
Building Code, or any other City Ordinances.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman
ATTEST: rovV
Candyc urnett, Secretary
I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 11th day of February 2015, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
Conditions of Approval
j�wctio
GUCAMONCA Community Development Departrnent
Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358
Project Name: Creative Design Associates
Location: 6910.ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
A. Planning Department
1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all
other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in
effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
2. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than
wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency.
3. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department
standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD) Standards.
4. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCBRs) and Articles of Incorporation of the
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services
Department and the.City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to
the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the
City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the
name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said
information changes.
5. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots
for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to,
public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of
construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing.
6. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code
regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan
/ 7. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review
and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
8. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building
Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as
not to adversely affect adjacent properties.
Printed:1/21/2015 N .CltyofRC.us
Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358
Project Name: Creative Design Associates
Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
A. Planning Department
9. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property
owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at
least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter.
10. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry.
11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department.
12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water
efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82.
13. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for
the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within
the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be .kept free from weeds and debris and
maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing,
and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30
days from the date of damage.
14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in
the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits .for the
development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development
occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by
Fire Construction Services.
15. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
16. A minimum of trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided
within the project: percent - 48-inch box or larger percent - 36-inch box or larger,
percent-24- inch box or larger, percent- 15-gallon, and percent-5 gallon.
17. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking
stalls.
18. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in
the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 9
Printed:1121/20159
Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358
Project Name: Creative Design Associates
Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
A. Planning Department
19. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to
relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees,
for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be
required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate
at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant
of his obligations under this condition.
20. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter,
Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The
sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are
not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
21. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident
manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free
Multi-Family Housing Program.
22. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of
Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be
made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission
Secretary prior to public hearing.
23. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has, not commenced
within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
24. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth
from back of sidewalk.
25. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over
a curb stop).
26. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances,
and exits shall be striped per City standards.
27. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided
throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/
recreational uses.
28. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of
the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and
exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy
release of the affected homes.
w .CityofRC.us
Printed:1/21/2015 Page 3 of 9
Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, ORC2014-00358
Project Name: Creative Design Associates
Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
A. Planning Department
29. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the
issuance of Building Permits. The final report .shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to
below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate,
verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance
with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
30. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post
cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of
$729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion
of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for
City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions
required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit.
31. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the
applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to
issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to
know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
B. Engineering Services Department
1. Install traffic signal at intersection of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street/project entry.
a. Provide easements as needed for traffic signal equipment and maintenance on private drive aisle.
b. Upon completion of the joint use driveway and the traffic signal installation, the existing driveway to
the mobile home park shall be closed and reconstructed with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street trees
to the satisfaction of the mobile home park and the City Engineer.
c. The developer shall receive credit against and reimbursement of costs in excess of the
Transportation Development Fee in conformance with City Policy. If the developer fails to submit for
said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the
City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate.
2. Provide two (2) 9500 Lumens LED street lights.
3. Verify existing access ramps on Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista for conformance to ADA
requirements and to City Std. 102. Otherwise reconstruct access ramps to current City Std. 100-B
and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA
Solutions, Inc. or approved equal.
www.CityofRC.us
Pooled:1/21/2015 Page 4 of 9
Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358
Project Name: Creative Design Associates
Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
B. Engineering Services Department
4. Provide a final drainage report to determine:
a. Storm water Flows for the fully developed tributary area north of the Archibald/Monte Vista
intersection, for both the 25-year and 100-year storm events, with nodes at the proposed inlet facility
and all catch basins.
b. Include a preliminary water surface profile gradient analysis of the proposed pipe to determine if
the drop in the existing pipe under Monte Vista Avenue has a negative impact on the hydraulic grade
line of the proposed storm drain pipe.
c. Determine the extent of ponding as a result of relocating the pipe inlet headwall and propose
alternatives to direct overflows to Archibald Avenue without impacting adjacent properties.
d. Confirm that 0100 will remain within the street on Archibald (top of curb).
5. Provide confirmation from Cucamonga Valley Water District that a 1-foot separation between the
bottom of a sewer line and the top of a storm drain is acceptable,
6. The following impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of building permit (fees subject to change
annually with a scheduled increase May 1, 2015):
a. Transportation Fee $ 9,002.00
b. General Drainage Fee $ 19,382.00/per net acre
c. Beautification Fee $ 0.20/ SF
d. Park Fees $4,396.00
e. Library Impact Fee $ 576.98
f. Animal Center Impact Fee $ 124.29
g. Police Impact Fee $ 172.00
7. Gated entrance shall be in accordance with the City's "Residential Project .Gated Entrance Design
Guide" standard.
8. Private storm drains connecting to the public storm drain will need to be shown on the public
improvement plans, but they shall be labeled "private" and their sizing will be reviewed by the Building
and Safety Division in plan check.
9. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-59 approving
Tentative Tract Map 17444 shall apply.
10. Structures within the vicinity of the City's storm drain shall provide deepened footings so as to
avoid a surcharge on the storm drain.
E. Grading Section
Printed:1/21/2015 w .CityofRC.us
Page 5 of 9
Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358
Project Name: Creative Design Associates
Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020213161-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
E. Grading Section
1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices (including but not limited to the infiltration trenches) to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as
described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs
associated with the structural storm water treatment devices are the responsibility of the land owner.
2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans the
engineer of record shall provide a definition (including an inset exhibit if necessary) defining the term
"Distributed Area".
3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit should a conflict occur between the Final Project-Specific
Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan and the final Project Landscaping Plans,
the project improvements shown on the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site
and Drainage Plan shall govern.
4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a copy of the final project landscaping plan(s) shall be
submitted as a reference set of plans with the permitted set of precise grading plans for review and
shall be included in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan.
5. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building
Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s)
shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan.
6. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to
perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review.
Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report.
7. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and
submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review.
8. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of
building permits.
9. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects
and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more
of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet
signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer.
10. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place
a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
11. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for
review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit.
www.CityofRC.us
PnnteC:1/27/2015 Page 6 of 9
Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358
Project Name: Creative Design Associates
Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
E. Grading Section
12. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC .3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm
water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by
the Engineer of Record.
13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements
prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
14. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent
property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter
wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line.
15. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where
possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
16. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private
property.
17. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted
California Plumbing Code.
18. Private streets for multifamily developments will include. street plans as part of the Grading and
Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top
of curb profiles.
19. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be
constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code.
20. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an
under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading
permit.
21. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet
beyond project boundary.
22. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official.
23. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California
Building Code.
24. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit".
Punted:1/21/2015 w .CityofRC,uS
Page 7 of 9
Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, ORC2014-00358
Project Name: Creative Design Associates
Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
E. Gradina Section
25. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor
shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project
owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading
requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from
the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building
Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and
Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to .request the following grading inspections
prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough
Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading
contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an
original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by
the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the
compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the
functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices
(BMP) devices.
27. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of
Approval.
28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint
maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP)
devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for
by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan,
29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on the final grading and drainage plan the applicant shall
clearly show an emergency overflow drainage path should the proposed storm drain pipe become
clogged/plugged with debris. The emergency overflow path shall not Flood any residential structures.
30. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable'. Prior
to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Building Official.
31. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by
the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office.
32. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number(WDID).
33. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department
Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit.
www.QtyofRC.us
Panted:1/21/2015 Page 8 o/9
Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358
Project Name: Creative Design Associates
Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020213161-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
E. Grading Section
34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint
maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP)
devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for
by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan.
35. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the
property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent
off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present).
36. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters
and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent
37. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along
common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing
work on the adjacent property.
38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show a City required dust
control sign within 50-feet of the project construction entrance and a second dust control sign shall be
placed within 50-feet of the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park entrance.
39. All underground vaults within the proposed construction area on the Chapparal Heights Mobil
Home Park which are not traffic rated shall be shown on the permitted set of grading and drainage
plans to be replaced with traffic rated vaults prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
40. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the engineer of record shall submit with the private
domestic water and sewer plans, calculations showing the proposed sewer line placed near and
under the proposed storm water quality infiltration trenches will withstand any buoyance issues
created from the proximity to the said infiltration trenches.
41. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show the project
construction entrance fronting directly on a public street. Construction access from the Chapparal
Heights Mobile Home Park shall not be permitted.
42. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit that applicant shall make a good faith effort in writing,
and show on the permitte grading and drainge plan, work to be completed on the Chapparal Heights
Mobile Home Park including, but not limited to, refinishing the drainage inlet on the Chapparal
Heights Mobile Home Park property along with any other construction requirements as shown on the
approved conceptual grading and drainage plan dated June 03, 2014.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:112112015 Page 9 of 9