The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About15-39 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 15-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DURATION OF AN EXISTING ENTITLEMENT APPROVAL BY AN ADDITIONAL ONE (1) YEAR FOR AN INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE/OFFICE PROJECT COMPRISED OF TWO (2) BUILDINGS WITH A COMBINED FLOOR AREA OF ABOUT 100,000 SQUARE FEET ON A PARCEL OF ABOUT 212,000 SQUARE FEET(4.87 ACRES)WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 9212 HERMOSA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0209-211-41. A. Recitals. 1. 611 & Hermosa JP/DF, LLC filed an application for the extension of the duration of the entitlement approval ("time extension") for Development Review DRC2007-00696, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject time extension request is referred to as "the application," DRC2015-00244. 2. On May 14, 2008, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-19, thereby approving the Development Review DRC2007-00696 subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. In April of 2013, the applicant submitted a request to extend the duration of the entitlement approval for DRC2007-0696 (related file: Time Extension DRC2013-00326) by two (2) years. This time extension request was approved by the Planning Commission on June 26, 2013. The new date that the entitlement was set to expire was May 14, 2015. 4. On the May 27, 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 27, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant does not propose any changes to the original project in conjunction with this time extension request; b. The previously approved Development Review is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes and policies; C. The extension of the Development Review approval will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes or policies; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-39 TIME EXTENSION DRC2015-00244— PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY May 27, 2015 Page 2 d. The extension of the Development Review approval will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission determined that the original project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions and Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects in connection with the City's approval of Development Review DRC2007-00696 on May 14, 2008. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No changes are proposed to the project; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; and no new important information shows that the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered. There are no changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated when concluding the project was categorically exempt. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not analyzed in the previous environmental review and will not have more severe effects than previously analyzed. b. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2015-00244 for Development Review DRC2007-00696. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby extends the duration of the existing entitlement approval by an additional one(1)year, and modifies the applicable conditions of approval that relate to the expiration of the entitlement approval for Development Review DRC2007-00696 in Resolution No. 08-19. The modified conditions are listed in the attached Conditions of Approval. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY 2015 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-39 TIME EXTENSION DRC2015-00244— PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY May 27, 2015 Page 3 BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: rQ S' r3�� Candyc tPurnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Conditions of Approval F :. j�.viceo Community Development Department G'UCAMONCA Project#: DRC2015-00244 Project Name: DRC2007-00696 TIME EXTENSION Location: ---020921141-0000 Project Type: Time Extension ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for the extension of the duration of the entitlement approval (time extension) for Development Review DRC2007-00696 and modification of the applicable approval time limit as described in Standard Condition B.1 contained in Resolution No. 08-19 that was adopted by the Planning Commission on May 14, 2008. 2. The time extension of the entitlement approval is for one (1) year. The new expiration date for Development Review DRC2007-00696 is May 14, 2016. 3. All other conditions of approval included in Resolution No. 08-19 and Resolution No. 13-25, and including all of the standard/special conditions of approval of other City departments, for Development Review DRC2007-00696 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18872 shall apply. w .CityofRC.us Printed:5nn01e