Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012/07/25 - Agenda Packet - PC • a THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION Y c', �.010.. AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA JULY 25, 2012 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Munoz_ Vice Chairman Howdyshell Fletcher_ Wimberly _ Oaxaca • { II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES . July 11, 2012 Regular Meeting Minutes July 11, 2012 Adjourned (Workshop) Meeting Minutes III. PUBLIC HEARINGS I The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 - HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. - A request to construct and operate a funeral home (that will not include a crematory, a cemetery, nor conduct embalming)with a floor area of 6,911 square feet and a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of 2.32 acres (note: final area of the parcel subject to outcome of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691) within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Professional (OP) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located near the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street - APN:1100-031-07. Related file: Development Review DRC2011-01094D. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • 1 of 4 w � PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA c JULY 25, 2012 RANCno CUCAMONGA B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D- HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC- A review of a proposed funeral home (that will not include a crematory, a cemetery, nor conduct embalming) with a floor area of 6,911 square feet and a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of 2.32 acres (note: final area of the parcel subject to outcome of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691) within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Professional (OP) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located near the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street - APN:1100-031-07. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011- 01094. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. IV. OLD BUSINESS C. SELECTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OFFICER POSITIONS (CONTINUED FROM THE JULY 11, • 2012 MEETING) D. SELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS (CONTINUED FROM THE JULY 11, 2012 MEETING) E. SELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION TRAILS COMMITTEE MEMBERS (CONTINUED FROM THE JULY 11, 2012 MEETING) V. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS VII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. • 2 of 4 ■ I- r_`j j PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO JULY 25, 2012 CUCAMONGA I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 19, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, e please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire • group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. • 3 of 4 ,-�, - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JULY 25, 2012 RANCIIO CUCAMONGA APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,216 for maps and $2,328 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us • • 4 of 4 Vicinity Map •Planning Commission Meeting July 25 , 2012 A and B i ii fin [ J A A N d d I it I .2 EI m1 r m /SI ) ■ -� ) I I I S � I = , I I ► I 19th St•�, i I r i I • �i� II`1 ../- ...LT, Base Line i°"— �1r' Base Line I] C lurch a I i \ Church Foothill.; 1116 r f i Foothill E c i m m j+ m LOH Arrow E " t` a Arrow I gl II( ( Jersey 0 i` a 8th �° w 0 1\ I T -._.1 C7 6th (� N c J -- 6th W N o € > Y !EE 4th Q 2 I 5 i1 lath A U • * Meeting Location: City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive a • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting July 11, 2012 Chairman Munoz called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:32 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Frances Howdyshell, Lou Munoz, Francisco Oaxaca, ABSENT: Ray Wimberly STAFF PRESENT: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Mike Smith, Associate Planner • ANNOUNCEMENTS None APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Fletcher, carried 3-0-1-1 (Howdyshell abstain, Wimberly absent), to approve the minutes of June 13, 2012. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. NON CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00057-THOMAS WINERY PLAZA - SSB PARTNERS INC. - A request to operate a full service restaurant and bar with outdoor eating areas and entertainment within a historic building at the Thomas Winery Plaza located in Subarea 2 of the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard—APN: 0208-101-23. Related Files: Entertainment Permit DRC2012- 00058 and Minor Development Review DRC2012-00696. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities B. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2012-00058 - SSB PARTNERS INC. -A request to provide • live entertainment such as a disc jockey, bands and dancing at a full service restaurant and bar with outdoor dining in the Thomas Winery Plaza located in Subarea 2 of the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard —APN: 0208- • 101-23. Related Files: Non Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057 and Minor Development Review DRC2012-00696. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. C. MINOR DEVELOMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00696 - SSB PARTNERS INC. - A request to construct a second outdoor eating area that is 1,093 square feet located on the north side of the building at a proposed restaurant and bar in the Thomas Winery Plaza in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 2) at 8916 Foothill Boulevard. APN: 0208-101-23. Related Files: Non Construction Conditional Use Permit, DRC2012-00057 and Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. He gave a brief PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) summarizing the project application. He said no calls of concern regarding the application have been received. Chairman Munoz opened the public hearing and invited the applicant to speak. Bobby Bedi, said he is appearing on behalf of his two partners. He said they want their concept to help the both the restaurant and the center as the tenant space has been vacant for over 4 years. He thanked Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner, and the Planning team for their assistance. Singh Sartaj said he was under the impression the City was going to move the conveyor belt. • Larry Henderson, a 22 year resident, cited his concerns regarding the historical resources, alcohol service,the apparent non-defined boundaries of the dance floor and big screen tvs. He said this will give a totally different atmosphere than prior tenants. He said the type of entertainment proposed is very open and the business-may be more like a night club. He predicted that within 6 months there would be alcohol related problems. He said the applicant should be made aware they are responsible for what may happen outside in their parking lot. Ed Dietl, a 40 year resident said he is excited someone is going into the building and keeping the outside design similar to what it was as it is the oldest winery in California. Money comes from alcohol sales and he said he has known the owners for years and they are familiar with this type of business. Chairman Munoz closed public hearing. Mr. Bedi said he will not run it like a nightclub; it will be a nice sports bar and food will be the focus. He said after 9:30pm it will be for 21 years of age and over. He said he would work with staff to be sure everyone is on the same page. Chairman Munoz asked him to respond to the question about the dance floor. Mr. Bedi said it is about 200 square feet and they do not intend to move the seating to create a larger area. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney noted the floor plan on A-B-C page 9 should add a stipulation • that the dance floor is 187 square feet. He suggested the condition of approval on Page A-B-C 30 Planning Commission Minutes -2- July 11, 2012 • l � • says the artifacts need to be maintained on site. He said language about where on site could be added if the Commission desires it. He said the applicant agreed to store it in the attic. Mr Beddi said the Historic society (HPARC) asked to have it moved to another winery so it can be seen. He said they are agreeable to either option. Chairman Munoz said staff prefers to store it on site to preserve the historical integrity. Mr. Beddi said it will have to be broken down to 3 pieces to get it up there. Jeff Bloom, Interim Planning Director noted the weight, structure, and strength of the attic are issues. He suggested that we keep the language "stored on site" and then staff can work out the mechanics with the Building Official. He said it is better to leave this in staff's collective hands. Chairman Munoz said he would like to include one of our historic preservation staff to be part of the decision. Commissioner Oaxaca asked if dismantling an artifact to move it triggers other further review. Mr. Bloom said that is what we are trying to avoid and it deserves to be handled technically. He said it is our intent to preserve it intact. Mr. Flower said if it required total destruction or reassembly it may trigger the need for a Certificate of Appropriateness. He said to amend Condition #11 on Page 30 add, "The conveyor may be moved from its current location with the approval and consultation of the Planning Director and the • Building Official." • Commissioner Fletcher said he supports the idea of leaving it up to staff and the Director; keeping it on site or elsewhere does not really matter to him. He said he has been there and the concerns about structural support are probably valid. He said he would not be opposed to moving it offsite, but it is important to identify it where it is. Mr. Bloom said the goal is to accommodate the restaurant while preserving and not interfering as much as possible with the historic fabric of the building; the goal is to keep it intact. He said the Building Official and the structural Engineer had concerns about stability. Chairman Munoz closed the public hearing. Commissioner Fletcher disclosed that he has known Sartaj Singh for many years. He said he has no concerns about operating this business. He said the adaptive reuse and preserving the exterior and interior is good and this is good for the west side. He noted if future problems occur and are not corrected, it will be brought back to the Commission for review. Commissioner Oaxaca said he is comfortable with the project as the owners operate their other successful restaurant in the same center. He noted this business is a higher level of responsibility. He thanked them for their faith in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said they have a big investment and years in the community. She said she is sure the applicants are aware of issues that occurred with other similar businesses and they know what is expected. She expressed support of the project. • Planning Commission Minutes -3- July 11, 2012 • Chairman Munoz said ditto to all the comments. He said he is comfortable with this. He said the • adaptive reuse is appreciated. He said he is sensitive to the concerns. He went on record to say this Commission is ready to address any/all issues following this approval. He said he is confident about how this owner runs his establishments and he asked them to please read the conditions and know what is expected. He expressed support. Motion: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the Resolutions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00057, Entertainment Permit DRC2012-00058 and Minor Development Review DRC2012-00696 with a stipulation that the dance floor is 187 square feet and to amend Condition #11 on page A-B-C 30 as noted in the discussion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, NOES: NONE ABSENT: WIMBERLY - carried . . . . . NEW BUSINESS D. SELECTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OFFICER POSITIONS Motion: Moved byFletcher, seconded by Oaxaca, carried 4-0-1, to continue the item to the July 25, 2012 meeting date. • E. SELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS Motion: Moved byFletcher, seconded by Oaxaca, carried 4-0-1, to continue the item to the July 25, 2012 meeting date. F. SELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION TRAILS COMMITTEE MEMBERS Motion: Moved byFletcher, seconded by Oaxaca, carried 4-0-1, to continue the item to the July 25, 2012 meeting date. . . . . . PUBLIC COMMENTS None . . . . . COMMISSION BUSINESS AND COMMENTS None . . . . . • Planning Commission Minutes -4- July 11, 2012 I ADJOURNMENT • Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell, carried 4-0-1 (Wimberly absent),to adjourn. The Planning Commission adjourned at 8:30 p.m. to a workshop held in the Rains Room. The workshop adjourned at 9:53 p.m. and those minutes appear separately. Approved: • • Planning Commission Minutes -5- July 11, 2012 d 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • Adjourned Meeting July 11, 2012 Chairman Munoz called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 8:45 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Frances Howdyshell, Lou Munoz, • Francisco Oaxaca; Ray Wimberly ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Mike Smith, Associate Planner; Jeff Bloom, Interim Planning Director • NEW BUSINESS A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2012-00680 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A request for a Planning Commission Workshop review of a proposed gated, single-family residential project comprised of 310-350 detached homes on lots of 4,000, 4,800, and 2,500 • square feet on a vacant parcel of 80.8 acres in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located about 525 east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-041-09. Mike Smith, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and gave a brief overview of the project. He said the applicants' concept includes 3 planning areas each having different lot sizes and product type; Areas 1 & 2 are fairly conventional,Area 3 would use an auto plaza/common driveway. He said the applicants are asking for various requirements to be loosened such as setbacks, common open space. He said 8 amendments would be needed to be made to Planning documents in order to approve the application. He said the width of the streets needs to be wide enough for visitor parking and emergency vehicle access. Commissioner Wimberly arrived at 8:55 p.m. He said it has been stressed to the applicants that quality of architecture may be requested to enhance and to mitigate for the loss of other requirements. He said staff does not support a City park as depicted on the south side of the site. The General Plan Update had this park removed. He said this may help address the issue of the combined open space requirement. Jeff Clemens of Lennar Homes said they want to create gated enclave better than what surrounds it. He said they would like to use optional standards to create a unique destination. He said the garages are split and each has space to park in front of the garage. The auto plaza is meant to be private space and to be played in and is not a major drive aisle or alley. He said the entrance drive offers the feel of destination by focusing on the pool/clubhouse. He said no homes are fronting the plaza product. The plan incorporates a buffer around entire project and they plan to access the • trails. He said the traditional homes provide back yards. He said it also respects the City's desire to not have a garage dominated street scene by using set back garages. 4 In response to Commissioner Fletcher, Mr. Clemens said the two-story home product size ranges from 1700 to 2500 square feet on 2500 square foot lots. Commissioner Fletcher voiced concern about so many changes/amendments that are needed (a • total of 8). He said it is a problem location,with lots of dust from the industrial area. He said it does not seem to fit in. Commissioner Oaxaca said he shares some concern with all the change. He said he would like to see how utilizing the park space could affect the proposal. He also had concerns with the density of area 3; parking and traffic flow. He expressed the need for walkability and how could green spaces be arranged in that they now seem peripheral rather than integrated within the community; i.e. break up the blocks of green space. He asked them to consider the demographics of our community; we need single-story stock. He said a traffic study may be needed to see if a signal is needed at Arrow. Vice Chairman Howdyshell expressed concern about density; it is more than what she wants to see and she wants single-story. She said the Planning Area 3 layout specific to parking is a challenge as HOA's may not allow kids to play on the auto court. She said she wants more walkability and more green space towards the center of the project. Commissioner Wimberly expressed concern about the number of amendments to the Etiwanda Specific Plan that would be needed. He said he would like to see what could be produced with the plan remaining in place. Chairman Munoz said ditto to all. He said staff will push the applicant towards design. He said his concerns include changes to the overlay that result in losing other things; walkability, single-story homes; give seniors the option to live where they want; driveways-we've learned short, 5 footers are problematic; design-punch it up. He said the layout is going to limit the plotting etc. He suggested they reorganize the open space using the unwanted park space. • Mr. Clemens said to meet the design standards you end up with an attached community and that would be difficult for financing. He said they may go back and look at doing it under the Basic Standards. Vice Chairman Howdyshell likened the project to The Preserve in Chino. Commissioner Oaxaca said they should create opportunities for residents to interact with each other. Jeff Bloom, Interim Planning Director asked what the fall is over the whole site. Dan Guerra responded 1.5% • Mr. Bloom commented that the paseos take up all the grade. He said the walkability is all disjointed in that a person must go a long distance to go in one direction and then to the next. He said they also need to find ways to open it out for connectivity. Mr. Clemens said it is similar to College Park in Chino. He asked if they could relax the 10-foot separation requirement. Chairman Munoz said that would be tough as it is already spitting distance. Commissioner Oaxaca said he is not totally opposed to it, but there needs to be practical considerations such as parking/trash cans/etc. • PC Adjourned Minutes -2- July 11, 2011 Mr. Bloom suggested they look at goals beyond the numbers. He recommended the recreation center be moved towards the center of the project site. • kt * f • PUBLIC COMMENTS None * * * * * COMMISSION BUSINESS AND COMMENTS None ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjourned at 9:53 p.m. Respectfully submitted, James R. Troyer, AICP Secretary • Approved: • PC Adjourned Minutes -3- July 11, 2011 STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANCHO DATE: July 25, 2012 CURCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Interim Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 - HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. - A request to construct and operate a funeral home (that will not include a crematory, a cemetery, nor conduct embalming) with a floor area of 6,911 square feet and a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of 2.32 acres (Note: Final area of the parcel subject to outcome of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691) within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Professional (OP) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located near the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street - APN: 1100-031-07. Related file: Development Review DRC2011-01094D. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D - HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. - A review of a proposed funeral home (that will not include a crematory, a cemetery, nor conduct embalming)with a floor area of 6,911 square feet and a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of • 2.32 acres (Note: Final area of the parcel subject to outcome of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691) within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Professional (OP) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located near the southeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street - APN: 1100-031-07. Related file: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094 and Development Review DRC2011-01094D by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Site - Vacant— Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan North - Single-Family Residences — Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Office Buildings— Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan East - 1-15 Freeway West - Single-Family Residences — Mixed Use (MU) District, Victoria Planned Community B. General Plan Designations: Site - Office North - Low Medium Residential South - Office • East - not applicable West - Mixed Use Items A & B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 2 • C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a vacant, irregularly-shaped parcel of approximately 164,200 square feet (3.77 acres) located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street (Exhibit B). As part of the proposal, the applicant has submitted a Lot Line Adjustment (Related file: Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). This adjustment will change the alignment of the property line (that separates the subject parcel and the parcel to the south and reduce the land area of the project site - see dashed line on Exhibit B). Following the adjustment the rectangular parcel will have an area of approximately 101,000 square feet (2.32 acres) with overall dimensions of approximately 350 feet (east to west) by approximately 307 feet (north to south). To the west across Etiwanda Avenue, and north across Candlewood Street of the project site, are single-family residences. To the east is the 1-15 Freeway. To the south of the project site are two small buildings — a post office and an office, while immediately to the northwest of the project site is the historic Cour House. Neither the office buildings, nor the Cour House are part of this project. The zoning of all of the properties located southeast of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street, including the project site, is Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties to the west is Mixed Use (MU) District, Victoria Planned Community. The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,265 feet and 1,255 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: • A. Background: On November 11, 2011, HMR Architects, on behalf of SCI (Service Corporation International) Funeral Service Inc., submitted Conditional Use Permit and Development Review applications for review by the City according to the procedures described in Section 17.04.030 and 17.06.010 of the Development Code. The Etiwanda Specific Plan (adopted in 1983) permits the operation of "mortuaries" in the Office Professional (OP) District provided that a Conditional Use Permit application for the use has been reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Similarly, the construction is permitted provided that a Development Review application for the building also has been reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Once deemed "Complete," the City is obligated by State law to process these applications. The applications were deemed "Complete" on February 13, 2012. Because the use is permitted with a Conditional Use Permit and construction is permitted with a Development Review, the City cannot decline to process these types of applications or make a decision on the applications without a review and action by the Planning Commission. B. General Land Use and Operating Characteristics: The applicant, SCI (Service Corporation International) Funeral Service Inc., proposes to construct and operate a one-story funeral home of 6,911 square feet with a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet (Exhibit D). The funeral home will provide services for the deceased and their families. Services offered will be limited to arrangement of services, wakes/visitations, and funerals. Pre-funeral services, such as the preparation of the deceased such as embalming and body dressing, and/or post-funeral services, such as cremation and/or burials, are not proposed. If there is a wake/visitation scheduled in the evening and a funeral service scheduled the following day, then the deceased will be stored temporarily on-site. The proposed operating hours are between • 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Monday through Friday) and between 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (Saturday and Sunday). If an evening visitation is requested to occur prior to a funeral service A & B 2 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 3 that will occur the following day, the visitations will be conducted between 6:30 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. There will be up to four (4) employees (Exhibit L). The funeral home will .be comprised of the following rooms (see also Exhibit F): Name of Room Floor Aria (SF) Function Lobby 522.75 Initial gathering area and chapel overflow Reception 72 Receptionist Arrange 165 Funeral arrangements Manager/Arrange 165 Manager's office (funeral arrangements as needed) Staff 340 Administrative support (clerical, accounting, etc.) Hospitality 414 Gathering room during visitations Selection 370 Retail display area of caskets, urns, etc. Visitation (2 rooms) 735 Viewing of the deceased Receiving 340 Delivery of the deceased Chapel 1,872 Memorial services - Courtyard 417 Outdoor hospitality Miscellaneous Restrooms, utilities, storage, and hallways As noted previously, activities such as embalming, cremations, and/or burials will not occur on-site. Burials/interment will occur at cemetery locations chosen by the deceased and/or the family of the deceased. Embalming and cremations will occur off-site at specific locations • identified by SCI Funeral Services, Inc. as follows (see also Exhibit L): Activity Location Draper Mortuary Embalming and 811 N. Mountain Avenue, Ontario Body Dressing Atcheson & Graham Mortuary 7944 Magnolia Avenue, Riverside Cremations Mt. View Mortuary and Cemetery 570 E. Highland Avenue, San Bernardino Funeral services and associated activities are anticipated to occur an average of three (3) times per week. The duration of a funeral service will vary. After the funeral service, if the family of the deceased chooses to do so, there will be an escorted funeral procession to the cemetery. According to a traffic impact analysis prepared by Albert Wilson & Associates on May 11, 2012 (Exhibit S), the typical duration time for an escorted procession to pass through a particular point, such as a street intersection, will be dependent on the number of vehicles in the procession. Assuming that there would be an average of three (3) persons per vehicle, with the seating capacity of the funeral home of 168 persons, this equates to fifty-six (56) vehicles (168/3 = 56). The traffic engineer estimates that it would take four (4) seconds per vehicle to pass a particular point. Therefore, it would take a procession of 56 vehicles approximately 3 minutes and 44 seconds to pass a particular point along the procession route. If there is no procession, then the use of the public streets will occur in a normal manner. C. General Design and Technical Characteristics: The proposed funeral home of 6,911 square • feet will be located generally at the front center of the project site (Exhibit D) and will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in A & B 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D—HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 4 • Sections 5.23.309 (Setbacks) and 5.24.304 (Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Setbacks) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Specifically, the proposed building will be setback from the property lines at Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street by approximately 93 feet and approximately 127 feet, respectively. The proposed building will be approximately 59 feet from the south property line and approximately 195 feet from the re-aligned east property line (following the aforementioned lot line adjustment). The proposed building will be approximately 33 feet from the common property line that is shared with the Cour House property. The architecture of the proposed building (Exhibit H) will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in Section 5.42.600 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed building will be designed in the California Bungalow style. Incorporated into the architecture will be traditional materials such as river rock and wood siding and decorative details such as wood brackets and rafter tails at the roof eaves and decorative trim around the windows. All materials and details will be applied on all elevations of the building. Roofing will be composition shingle. The building will have a well articulated profile. At the front entrance on the west side of the building, there will be a prominent focal point featuring a 24-foot high, entry portico with a low-pitched roof, decorative support columns, and a large paned window above it. On the north side, there will be a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet. This feature will have a low- pitched roof and decorative support columns. At the south side of the building there will be a patio with lattice cover. Because of a raised roof over the attic, the roof line will be varied; a • set of dormers will be included on this raised portion of the roof. Loading and unloading will be via a roll-up door at the east side of the building. All HVAC equipment will also be located at the east side of the building. The architecture of the building will be consistent with the design goals and policies of the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission including 360-degree architecture and extensive use of high-quality materials. Furthermore, the architecture of the building will complement the single-family residences that front the street along Etiwanda Avenue and the historic Cour House. As the building will be plotted generally at the front center of the site, the majority of the parking will be located on the east side of the site, to the rear of the building. Two vehicle access driveways are proposed - a main driveway at Etiwanda Avenue and a secondary driveway at Candlewood Street. Landscaping will be provided throughout the parking lot and perimeter of the project site (Exhibit E). At the east (rear) side of the project site, the applicant proposes to have a large area of approximately 65 feet (east to west) by approximately 240 feet (north to south) that will be landscaped and otherwise left undeveloped to allow for on-site retention of storm water. Drive aisles will connect the subject site with the relatively undeveloped parcel (APN: 1100-041-01) to the south/east with the intent of allowing reciprocal access in the future. Another drive aisle will connect with the Cour House property with the intent of fulfilling the development plans of that property that were approved by the Planning Commission (Related file: Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-01046). D. Floor/Area Analysis: Per Chapter 2, Figure LU-2, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) in the • Office land use category is 100 percent. The net area of the project site will be approximately 101,000 square feet (subject to the approval of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). Following A & B 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 5 the completion of the funeral home, the building coverage (including the porte-cochere) will be 8,282 square feet. Therefore, the floor area ratio for this site will be 8.2 percent. E. Parking Calculations: The parking calculation for the funeral home is one (1) parking stall per 25 square feet of assembly room, e.g. chapel, or floor area per Section 17.12.040(B)(1)(1) of the Development Code. Type Floor Parking # of Spaces of Use Area Ratio Required # of Spaces Provided (SF) Funeral Home 6,911 n/a n/a Chapel 1,872 1/25 75 75 F. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Granger) on March 20, 2012 (Exhibit Q). The Committee reviewed the application and deemed it acceptable for forwarding to the Planning Commission for review and action. The Committee observed that the architecture of the funeral home incorporated the design features that convey the characteristics of the Etiwanda area and was consistent with the design goals and policies of the Design Review Committee and Planning • Commission including 360-degree architecture and extensive use of high-quality materials. The applicant agreed to complete or comply with the remaining design revisions identified in the Design Review Committee comments such as using real wood for the decorative trim around the windows and doors, using real river rock on the veneers, constructing a 36-inch high stone walls or bermed landscaping along Candlewood Street frontage to screen the • parking lot. Incorporated into the Resolution of Approval are a set of special conditions stating that these remaining issues shall be addressed in the plans submitted for plan check. G. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The project was reviewed by the Grading and Technical Review Committees on March 20, 2012. Both Committees deemed it acceptable for forwarding to the Planning Commission for review and action. Staff has included in the Resolution of Approval each Committee's standard and special conditions. H. Neighborhood Meeting: On March 8, 2012, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting at Etiwanda Gardens Community Center, which is located at 7576 Etiwanda Avenue across the street and to the north of the project site. The representatives of the applicant who were in attendance were Mr. Dann Narveson and Mr. Glen Abercrombie of SCI, Inc.; Mr. Brad Buller; Mr. William Reseigh of HMR Architects; and Mr. Chidin Onumonu of Albert Wilson & Associates (traffic engineering consultant). Staff members in attendance were Mike Smith, Associate Planner, and Dan James, Senior Engineer. Although there are 105 individuals, not including duplicates, listed on the sign-in sheet (Exhibit M) there were at least 200 individuals in attendance based on a visual headcount conducted by the applicant's representative, Mr. Brad Buller. After approximately 10 minutes • of the applicant presenting the proposal, those in attendance clearly indicated that they were opposed to the project. The regular presentation of the project was discontinued, and the remainder of the neighborhood meeting was devoted to receiving verbal comments from the A & B 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D —HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 6 • attendees and fielding questions about the development process. The general comments from the public attending the meeting (and from mailed/e-mailed correspondence submitted to staff — Exhibit 0) are summarized as follows with staff's response in italics; the applicant's summary of the meeting is attached (Exhibit N): 1. Neighborhood compatibility — the suitability of a funeral home in an area dominated by residential development. The Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, consistent with the City's General Plan, regulate where various uses including funeral homes can be located. Both documents identify various areas within the City that are suitable for commercial uses. The uses that are allowed are established based on the service of the use to the larger community of Rancho Cucamonga and the suitability of the use within the context of its location. Funeral homes are permitted with a Conditional Use Permit in the Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (Exhibit R). There are no changes in the General Plan, development district/zoning, and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan that are required in order for this proposal to be considered. There are existing facilities such as churches that commonly provide funeral services in residential neighborhoods or in proximity to residential neighborhoods throughout the City. Although facilities that provide funeral services exclusively are not present in the City, it is expected that the proposed funeral home will operate in a similar manner as a similarly sized church would operate during a funeral service with similar associated characteristics such as funeral • processions, large gatherings of people, and wakes/visitations. The proprietor of Etiwanda Gardens attended the neighborhood meeting (as the host) and at that time, he stated that funeral services are currently conducted at Etiwanda Gardens within the immediate neighborhood. Some of the other attendees acknowledged awareness of this fact. Some members of the public indicated they are not opposed to Etiwanda Gardens conducting funerals because that facility also serves as a setting for weddings, banquets, and other community gatherings, i.e. Etiwanda Gardens is not used exclusively for the purpose of funerals. 2. Limited public notification - some attendees stated that they did not receive a mailed notification about the neighborhood meeting and that awareness of the project occurred unofficially, i.e. heard through "word of mouth" or flyers produced by other property owners/residents. Existing State law requires notice of public hearings to all property owners within a radius of 300 feet from a property that is the subject of the hearing. Per City Council Ordinance No. 768 that was adopted on September 6, 2006, the radius for notification purposes for any project within the City that requires a public hearing is 660 feet (1/8 mile). Although a neighborhood meeting is not a public hearing, as it is an informal meeting conducted by the applicant, the applicant sent mailed notifications of the meeting to all property owners according to the requirements of this Ordinance. Furthermore, the applicant voluntarily included with the notification a copy of the letter submitted to the City that describes the project. In response to public comments, Staff • increased the coverage of the mailed public hearing notifications to include all property owners in the area south of Base Line Road, east of Victoria Park Lane, north of Church A & B 6 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 7 • Street, and west of 1-15 Freeway. Also, all individuals who submitted comments to the City via e-mail received a copy of the public hearing notification via e-mail. 3. Cremations and embalming — objections against cremations and/or embalming at the funeral home, and concerns about the potential aesthetic and environmental impacts caused by cremations and embalming. The proposal does not include cremation and/or embalming services. Each room and its corresponding function have been identified on the Floor Plan. Cremations and/or embalming will not be possible within the funeral home as there is no available floor area specified in the building for either purpose including storage and/or the equipment. The applicant has not requested to perform these services and the draft Resolution of Approval prohibits them. In addition, per Development Code Amendment DRC2009- 00691 reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on March 24, 2010, and Ordinance No. 830 adopted by the City Council on May 19 2010, crematoriums are only permitted in General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 14) — this restriction is reflected in Table 17.30.030 of the current Development Code (Exhibit T). Per Section 17.108.070 of the updated Development Code, crematoriums will be required to be a minimum of 1,000 feet from any residentially zoned property (Exhibit U). 4. Previously approved development on the project site — some attendees stated that they • were told that an office project was to be constructed at the project site. On April 27, 2005, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved a proposal to construct seven (7) buildings with a combined floor area of approximately 56,000 square feet that was to be comprised of retail and professional office uses (Related files: Development Review DRC2004-00716, Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01094, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17096). This office project was to be constructed on two existing parcels — the parcel upon which the funeral home is proposed (APN: 1100-031-07) and the adjoining parcel to the south (APN: 1100-041-01) — with a combined area of approximately 207,000 square feet (4.76 acres) (Exhibit V). Precise grading plans were submitted to the City for plan check by the Building and Safety Department on September 29, 2005, and again on May 22, 2006. Building construction plans were submitted to the same department on November 15, 2005, and again on April 6, 2006. For reasons not known to the City, neither the precise grading nor the building construction plans were ever resubmitted in order to obtain approval which would have allowed grading and construction to commence. Approvals for both Development Review and Conditional Use Permit applications expire five (5) years after they are granted. As building permits were not issued and/or the land use did not commence, the approval for both the subject Development Review and the Conditional Use Permit expired on April 27, 2010. The approvals for tentative Tract/Parcel Maps expire three (3) years after they are granted. As the final tract map was not submitted for review and approval by the City Council and the applicant did not request any time extensions, the approval for the tentative tract map expired on • April 27, 2008. A & B 7 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D—HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 8 • 5. Traffic circulation — the timing of the processions, relationship of the processions with traffic, and the safety of drivers and pedestrians. If there is an escorted procession, the typical duration time for a procession to pass through a particular point, such as a street intersection, will be dependent on the number of vehicles in the procession. Based on the size of the chapel within the proposed funeral home, the applicant's traffic engineer estimates that the size of the procession would be fifty-six (56) vehicles. He estimates that it would take approximately 3 minutes and 44 seconds, or four (4) seconds per vehicle, for the procession to pass a particular point along the procession route. If there is no procession, then the use of the public streets will occur in a normal manner. Staff expects the characteristics of non-escorted traffic will be similar to the characteristics of the traffic that would occur following the end of religious services at, for example, a church. The most direct routes to any cemetery would be via Etiwanda Avenue north to Base Line Road or via Etiwanda Avenue south to Foothill Boulevard. The nearest schools to the project site are Perdew Elementary School approximately 775 feet to the southeast at 13051 Miller Avenue and Grapeland Elementary School approximately 2,400 feet to the north at 7180 Etiwanda Avenue. These schools start classes Monday through Friday at 8:15 a.m. (gates open at 7:50 a.m.) and end at 2:45 p.m., except on "minimum days" when classes end at 1:15 p.m. (Exhibit X). The traffic that will be generated by the funeral home is consistent with the traffic volume expected for these • three streets and the level of service (LOS) of each street will not be significantly impacted. The intersections of Etiwanda Avenue with Base Line Road, Church Street/Miller Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard are controlled by traffic signals. Per • the Engineering Department, the applicant will be required to widen Etiwanda Avenue where it adjoins the project site so that it will have two (2) northbound lanes. The construction of improvements along the east side of Etiwanda, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk, also will be required. There are already two (2) southbound lanes, and improvements, such as curb, gutter, and sidewalk, on the west side of the street. 6. Crime — the presence of the funeral home will lead to criminal activity, such as gang relations during services for individuals with gang affiliations, at the funeral home and/or during funeral services. Staff is not aware of an increase in criminal activity or criminal presence during comparable funeral services elsewhere in the City. As there are no funeral homes in the City, staff contacted the Police Departments of comparably-sized cities — Ontario, Pomona, and Fontana — for discussion of this matter. The crime analysts from each of these departments stated they have no record of any criminal activity that is specific to funeral homes in their respective cities. Instead, the criminal activity that did occur was low-level crimes such as vehicle burglaries and petty theft. These crimes can occur in a variety of commercial and residential environments and are not directly attributed, or limited to, funeral homes. • A & B 8 J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D —HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 9 7. Impact on property values - the presence of the funeral home will cause a decrease in property values. It is difficult to assess the impact of a land use on property values as there are many variables. Staff recognizes that the property values have been impacted by the state of the economy and the housing market. In general, it can be expected that a specific land use/project will negatively affect property values if it causes, for example, significant air pollution; negative aesthetic impact; damage to biological habitat; loud noise and/or vibrations; or a substantial increase in traffic. The funeral home is not expected to have a substantial impact on property values because it will not have a significant impact on the above-stated elements. The proposed funeral home will not include a crematorium which could affect air quality. The building will incorporate design elements that will be consistent with the architecture of the homes in the neighborhood, lighting will be required to comply with the City's standards for overall height and luminosity, and there will not be a cemetery on-site which could cause visual distress. The project site does not contain biologically sensitive habitat nor will any existing trees be removed. Noise and vibrations are not typical characteristics of funeral homes. Lastly, traffic generated by this project is within the expected capacity of the surrounding streets. • 8. Psychological effects — the presence of the funeral home will make homeowners and their families uncomfortable as it will be a constant reminder of death. Staff recognizes that a funeral home may make some individuals uncomfortable. This level of discomfort will vary from person to person. There is no means to measure this discomfort and no means to mitigate it. Staff can only analyze a project based on land use factors and design merits of the project. Etiwanda Gardens located immediately to the northwest of the project site and other facilities such as churches located throughout the City conduct funerals. There is no history of any concerns with the funeral operations of these other facilities in similar proximity to residential land uses. I. Land Use Compatibility: The project will be consistent with the development district of the site and the surrounding development districts. The funeral home will provide a service to the community. Staff does not expect any practical negative impacts. The Development Code specifies performance standards applicable to all commercial uses and locations that must be complied with. There are no identified conflicts with these development standards. In the event that there are any violations for these performance standards, the Code Enforcement Department can be contacted to correct the problem. If necessary, the matter may be brought to the attention of the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission for further review and action. J. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, Staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to, for example, air quality • (including greenhouse gases) and hydrology/water quality there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that A & B 9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D—HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 10 • determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to a) all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site and b) all property owners who are not within 660 feet of the project but are in the area south of Base Line Road, east of Victoria Park Lane, north of Church Street, and west of 1-15 Freeway (Exhibit W). A total of 620 notices were mailed; this number does not include duplicate notices where the same individual or entity owned multiple properties in the above-noted notification area. Also, all individuals who submitted comments to the City via e-mail received a copy of the public notice via e-mail. All correspondence received prior to the final preparation of this Staff Report is attached (Exhibit 0). A petition signed by individuals opposed to the proposed project is also attached (Exhibit P). Respectfully submitted, effrey A. loom Interim Planning Director JAB:MS/ge • Attachments: Exhibit A - Aerial Map Exhibit B - Location Map Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map/Overall Site Plan Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Landscape Plan Exhibit F - Floor Plan Exhibit G - Roof Plan Exhibit H - Elevations Exhibit 1 - Building Sections Exhibit J - Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit K - Photometric Plan Exhibit L - Description of Operations (prepared by the Applicant) Exhibit M - Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet Exhibit N - Neighborhood Meeting Summary (prepared by the Applicant) Exhibit 0 - Correspondence from Property Owners Exhibit P - Petition from Property Owners Exhibit Q - Design Review Committee Action Comments Exhibit R - Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Tables for Commercial/Office Districts Exhibit S - Traffic Impact Analysis (excerpt; prepared by Albert Wilson Associates) Exhibit T - Ordinance No. 830 Exhibit U - Section 17.108.070 of the Updated Development Code (draft) • Exhibit V - Site Plan for Development Review DRC2004-00716 A & B 10 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 11 Exhibit W - Mailed Notification Map Exhibit X - Etiwanda School District Calendar for 2012-2013 Exhibit Y - Initial Study Parts 1 and 2 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2011-01094D • • A & B 11 , • Coilditionai Use Permit DRC2011 -01094 . • Development Review DRC2011 -01094D ... I. r -..:.,:-.7 Wir:J4w, ;- 1 . . .. ,._ . - 1.--:.77- ., filptrita i tizzy -, '''' ,,a -2 z .A4444CP,l 4; L .,-....,-.,...t,.• ri%--...ta i'at T.4-14-4 i te;,-4.4 4.24 44.4 lia'4,44..a.■Li . isiks OF AtiZa r M].C.' ; t l" . 4' ”( ‘. esif ,;.'444WCZ.C-ri a: 't.54414f, :.4 r .7-4,,V1/214-,• -..--.'il INK) .:*".-- 07..',A,Wiatii.' t ... tail ...... 3; .....--- i . ------ .!1]. \I: . nt, , ,, —; p,'," ,1 414.,": -°- 1 - .. .7.- - : . -...));...,, .itt '--- - - . 4;11.a `2--• ' 14^7,?; 0 ° N.,4,,..„,kilpirt- 1::-. . ...":4; 1 .i; ti: [4-c,p 4, ' ' '. . -=`....fik. i ec.it 1•00.. .:1 & - • 4 y. f.i ...... ,. . .42.: - .... •..; nt=c,-- •• , - „x -. a , _______ Bungalow Way t it '.1-1 ":8:; . i C -41=,- 7";77: E ., I.. .- ... .. .•.=race e ir-- 2 K:74.11r. - ' - aLta,.., ■ , ;”:4' . Everymay Ct. , .,:. 1 it . . . • "Th, 4 .'‘,'!Ij4-: .., „ 1:i ,‘I, Fl Kf: a •C41%,`:":aa ::: Tr, G*Irth: • .- - - ' •”,_,,=..- °- Mel.-- - r '' •,,••-•,4?) ....y. 4 • ... 2, a_ - rlf..zFt: H r-,2.-1 •• l'‘. '4 ,4•••,-4'....;-.,,it,,,,,„•.--•-±',-,'•;?P'-"•(1. •1 -., •r• 1- •fl-•••-y., . •••. , , 1.--;-,•••,;--:?. ti....:4:-•-• • . rr" kf - , '''',4-7';'-'4.f...7#!•.•"-:“..!•:::' -2. ill'r-. - cui4 a- gb -€41;r:2," i 1:41":Trlit- . , , . tiso $41:1,..,,r,. +p ., „^k , ,,,- ... . ,•, ' -4 `aikaa:- - • -;.4 7 ',It.,'-1:' ■;i j.4. 'C., I • b 4' , e Ii r-- - k. ;z.i ;4,14;14`,Eri.14',!a,44,..;i-.:4_4-41_C_4P-4_4.;447_•_,4.4i:7s..,t4i1/',-'', i..i.Vy.,..e.:.`.-.nc....•.....;,iL,o2.0*,j : L ' vzc 9 . _• i • mr.........' ..4- .-:-.. .-sl..:4:'-.- s re.td ';Ic ,.• __,-, -.....aragfersia_. ra_ .-s.Candlewood St. t . terc; ,o• ,,,efov.44:,,,..,-.. - n im,:i,t1", la- '''' F• •.' '4: 1 4.A ''liti,•:' ". x'-i.'-‘ -,_4,,V,Z 7,,,,,,,Stft,-,414'itsg, ,.'lfzit.,;;Air,_-,..,..---t ..'•-• 11,41; p 4,....,-1 ,..p i ••6;:f.z.. .4.a-K-4471.I.,•-lir:1•17,-...1 •.;-,,,;,,,, -per:iii., p .,...“i•-•,..t.,,,:-.... •.. -.--n,.....i ;:g.,:..-;,7,-4i.3-. .47::.*.1.4..3,:;;;;;;;;" ■"I' 2! •-:17r..-r:491.7':91-,SY.K1,'''.;;If. .etcy3 P.., - -I'PP 7PP. Pr.- ' - ,r.".PP Or?' .... re,eirrP7,tr" / igv--,-,szw:argotrai ',Av.,,, -...• ,zs s' ... ,,:.-.-,A;•.--.,..,..:-.,,,t.•,1 t i.- •••••t•-0., •:22'T';':'' I a' 14 4,1;447.24.4.4y4,44, •LrfZirie or 44 / firit4".4:"Th.4,444r r4.4,I4A,51i4Orr444r4 r „.. II al :I 4444504.44,,,pr.t4S 4:4,..44-4,44'.44 -744r -'414-[ -f. -r'or't-244----‘4-a! 4 4445174;A4,.,3 , . • R.?cr4- 4:404;ah,..414.4.4.T14,(4.: , / 41) ..44;444F;4 4.‘. Il 4 ' ti■4 „2.:,.,..)„.01.,;.'97“:14.2.:„,/ itti ' t.rOJ e te i • / . i.i . .. .....2t. ' Itlib ' ctSi _.- 7 / , 1 4 144 .Z41-00,E.,,ia.-1„p.''.' / r :4, . - itit 4 ta I.., L'47.4 ,., .4"4:4 -er.1.-' •4t 44,4,"94,44:44.?. W • '..fiskwe II.!, k2;.- ',----t .,v2"-7-t".7--ih.74-''./ ' p / .• IT atp Ap,014,,r. A‘44; 4110: tily::1.r.:041Y,-;f4..a?!.. , / / ,m, I. '. ., -is- • 4i*6-----iii ;-- aa,., ^CC .• 7 ••.i, 0.117.^-4'37‘ -r/t ,a, <0 t.:9,.. I.P' e'. 79W022.- dr ."443 ‘"''1:PP '3;±3-;4-3-'&-t-31- --.--.1.--.•,r . kir4“1‘ '''l' .1;, ' le.„ _ ,r, ,.7. ,'5f,- ,., . ;1/?ea-'3,3;-- -"c!,,1.;" L33°4.-3 i "3 ':'• -,..4.7.if k - "'"*.- ".---- .,04:44:LY',44q4:1:".it --0.'41,i1 *.;;;;Oltitfi.,f.:,-s.%).:;'[.(— ,Iret -t; i ',' :-Sell.445:teLc, --;"; , E6 t.kil..-4::.i;,.;;,.171 :-.7 4,,,4"...'pt;fiezocti'r't.i"'T,t;-,V' ` •• 0,4-'7,.,'.iii"4-i to41.,,,, -7■tif,A ;-. .. '---- - -Yr' ... r , i . 'i'at.:,?.? ..!••:•. •:.0.71e,J..,.-rffii.p:t7.-:•2:-.;:.,v: -16 " '-,-,---- Ale...., (< 4 it2.g r f 4.,%%7. ;:ip.'ff"raiNii; , - • r Y t i k.V4I-P.!1-''ierie.P.124.94V'l z 9?,,f211;;;-.;.,.;;P:911'17.; to IL..' 17 7.32.1,w..-,r, -....'41,,,y; ‘"1„'orcol4y741,11::','.o1/4'.1..t. .0,-34,.,,,,c,,,:,.2,11.t•,. N.® ' tit.1* : -:}7;r:."4 - 1,-t• ..th•-„Lit, ;', ei ,-- . 4,er-iv:it-I-,,... . -•--e,ii,- -,• -4.--,---p-,i;y-et,',-":2 rif4.,..nstr,;.."1 i. .4,,,H,T4.gt-.....- -:0*-417,..1",,,..,-;.:..;,,,..t,:,.itist.i.,--7;.* / 4\ -..; - ic st-figilv.:0,, iig-- ,i-12,iisiqin',-,:,,',.:' - - -.;-,T.. .„,-..... r 44---',4-iaViitiTli ' `tri-YitC? , ' or,q..i- . .11.1.1r.s,itz'oA,rzt‘,-(-. 1, it, / ..■-:`" ' ' c'' Per P ;:j., ''..i...',74"-,',-j,r-C--j,r9P., / ..-D'VI 2 Pp,i4P77' i•1'' 2P.i.,'P', "ZO,P'‘P4P112,9 6 41,,,,,g..44.;, .1 /1 ' .7..,:14-.V"'/4,;:::'': i'.4-1! -- ..) , 21.2k. ,::.ii.,,,,i2u1;i7i:Avt,$.3.i.,,,sy-,:.:4-, . , 4`14:7./i2its- in'i.:;*--.,..;:, 4 ' A ., (;.,11•T' ,, i" k:.,: .,Sis,I,"i i h T.-•i_z. .:;:,?,;:,€.). 1,',4t'4 .itg.-..--,P.- :.r.-,.$' '-',. / 4,44? . ,,,,,, 4-t.,.0.1-• et, '..` ..,V "..t. :'..ei:=.74, fliV1 f,I, ... .::QCF2L,,,:..'2' .-,0 4.#..,.. ,::1;',..f",... -tr„:-. sq474.." -., ..1)•,,,, ,- Ci,, / 'IP 0::?..:.'', 'J.'.''fr.c....t, .14 ',V; 1 110" '11 0: 136--Lil:IL41'2.41:°:::.-4-;-'413f4 kft;;,,PSIl273- t2 .i. / r--. / -2.„.••••77:-• •- tc. i ,,,,,,--r..„.--c.-.-1----,,•," sr.--kr.,7".....kr..• „thy , ...e.„:4 •• tIng. . • • -e--3 • 2=4.., - ......- .4.;•.?. ..trAr-,•--•- r i0- ,• : P.•,..,.;-..•:.•:citiic.t.,•.,; ..•:-45..Y•-_-. •.z.1.4).?"1"g(4,- tt, tr; •' 7t4- ,2:'PH:-.i•W -!.....3.4.1,i'Aite,kr / - .en-.- ..----•,-,,,,,i-iten •-.2,-..t; P...nt t., .;/... , t ,zifv-1,75 -. , zi „.. It -1 ....•;-,.. , 14 7.4a ,.,9Par 49,;-7-47,,"-;,.. 4f-a -,'Pse,,a.''PPP144.11P.4... -.PrttirP-PaP9 .7.-'m P - OP ' }:,,c .4401-, ' c-r. ...11,--,4,1-41414.14?144;4 / '''' '[4C:a'a:Y.;.41±4.4,:tiece,s,.,..,..,-.,,,,:------, • •:,,t .:•.4 r; i-,-, nit..v• ,pii,-.),--attftivAssi.e. e . _, ,,,,-,?,,-r,,1-.....:414.,:;:i,„„,0„,;,,,--e-z --, ',,4, ( / oft,,,, 7isf.YY7v4tineci,test, . .m, ,;.: -AtttcP i -1 .44P -:‘ ...;.-: I i tct.7.,,,32,;34-33r. t1/2 C'fal 1 i.1E:f'V EXHIBIT A , / ' r A & B 12*„,;!. -.4i -.4- , , oe.-. ...,, , qf ,-.-' 4.„-,p,',-- f: '' - -m 'I' . 31.: .r.ri.k. „ NO 6 Fir ,10q \,...- i ial '\ %PuLT.77.? .-.....•,H•---- i I5! ANIMAL CARE& ADOPTION CENTER: 0 1g 1 EXHIBIT B • . ' trx-arB (tit) ) ...,0_„..........,....M � )�../ FE 21111-Butt xi'Nosnow r OVW a�.'G 21211[1 F22'0d a�3100W/0 MOH ltltl3NN 0350d0i1d NOLI.VU Ir�/Y �� .. IYMMMId N3R1 BM Ll f.l ItLJLJI�I {21 i 1N3W39b'NVVI IBS N1„ r.>,oee :ua„m �8 - 1 Nil JI. fiNa, 4, 1; I . It ill !IP 2 B' 3 4 5a r A R+ mil `` iii§ wily h9;ceqf¢q ye5S4z°_eY $ypapp3$ppSSx4y4yry p$ qq;{{' ,� e,e x :tea t� 2'giii hik Ugh 79 Ei lia d RS I ®\ �k _= g . , ilk*, „, N ,\ \\*1 i, \ \ N IoW I p6, `,.,,i', .> \ r \\\* z 3: , in a i .. _ ! \r�\ \ r < ` - ,r:' �a a.\ \l'.`"\;. s .e de —/ YNI ,‘, .‘... , ,, ,,,,, ,.. , �n A � \ \ \ \ Av 1 . \r � ee�` k—" 7• v � A y\ A \ \ v l Art,.. o w \° _� 3€ ' ° ti1: I ,. \ o-�. .� \ � \. `3u: pMp e r )T,.,74)--,1-5 I a tr.l ® r a W,r -.:b --- r\ �� ' �I m it O F ti5 XsE ,:r 'e - r r (' vrteA`f. ''<4C, h\..�,A"Y� \:,:'"')..\; -:".,%4.,:.:',l \ r _ Q - Fk ao� t t ' i 3 f� mm,o- t- pH 1 r r _I A v v } AA�`-\ -Itj _ L~ �� _}t 3 .'� ,7-1,n.,_<, 3 - r .l .-o �l r \ \�'k N \ \ ' (1 1 'La la co r.- 'l� 4�l �;� � F-- -;- p .a. rt nom' . \\ `� \�\I { I't Ip r 'IL... C t I 7S {.�( t sd a _ 2.1!„-,) Frei . .ri V I re `' L� yg1 P-"l��% r�f ':'A i 3r� I-Y-y \fi �`: �33AY WNYM3 1 1 1`r = a L = � I i / • v P II f r $v _ :; VI I . t II r -`� t Htl 6 c: M, I S' �I - 1 .I - i it I ,—_a \ . � rr l I � t�� T �, n � I �l +f Er u tl °.a i- 1 I ro L,-r . f r _I of % f ti .: _f "B \ r_f L.L_ Ir ,I '1_ � gs e Eric g ZN OJ N u HI 1 O in =cl EXHIBIT `° 3z Mi;4 "§a 6 6 - i f 'ini' I 1 ri Ai ^ g } ,-, CD e 2 1-° .- ' tl 0 : r Le zoo E s )., 1, 5-, 122 0_ 1 ri. Ei $ ',' ! 1 ; „, ,,, cp Li _ , , , ,„ „„ ..,,,,.., :. - , f i 5, -1 V 1 .' 2'El ' ' ' ■ 2,T,< --Ltin "4 -1Y, i ■ 5 ! Gm Ss- .1 ggz5 v 0 - g d i 3 Cf) el, ii!? '<qv < ,-.1:q g C5 15 No= IE(.1 1:1010. ,;.0 i i „ r u u A t ;os 0_ a A LA A ) I . \ I \ ‘ \ \ .7 I k\, `,. \ t.' AA',2Eg z 1 I 1 \ \ I t.rdri i 8.— _ gee, \\\ CL Et:.-. 1- ,I, 2,0 ,,gt \ • ,P ,..,tiEnnorslAs211 Z 53 - aluTh.5.s.- V,/ \ A ,2t, ah:,C°01,421 _1 Rat iiii !!! ■ K/4 \ d'% \A\ \\ vY C7) ./0. ..e4 ce a 2, 1 4\ \ ops , ., tr#1111/311rMak 1NI1 len 4n iv • - • ' •• • •-•- :4 zi t,GIN 3 9;10 00 N I 1 k • \\,\ , , r, . 11 li ini e.,.. tt , , ,.. 5, .,=, ........ ; kiia -11-2 .. H 1 al • - 11 1 al ,f) ri III ,,t crult — — I i 11 1 6 411N 2 1 1121; — / 0 .....,4 I I • •,i ...- il h1.60 00.00N LO cf -- ! arasiliniaal . amsi 1 = ; 0 , 1.----, "----- Mg.O'D M I... 0 0 I I fl' ' .11 CC El .... .111 ^ ..ilikiii. „. I P : ,1 .I h_ 1 i lisn,:f. 1 , u.,_, 1 — ;-_ -_: g :::: „c.v. , r “ 4"Cw I 10 i t _ Illia . o n,_ ai•ii: l'q ■ :2 Lt 1 L''s 11/4 1 .., i I -' f ' =u.-'5 • 11 If ,. \5 °- 'lk.`: ` '' I a x›- 2 PiL IP ri 6-1 L______ maimmalar n: -I Tx r ,•.*:12133/ ,C1--"""-CL. '74114 -L6j." P —lal 2'SS' I • 1 5:EISKESIEMEEiii:;55: ::5 A-• ° .2 u-s 5 5 ••• ............,,,meme..., ....• —' g I Lt. I r • 10 'Wm::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::.::' ..... i I . , ci% 1 .... .. ...... I If t • ''-..:::.::.::::::•::::::::: .• ... ..• ... c!.... -, I 14 t ...X::: g —— .-rr I CC---.7:1=r-.: 1::1", -C_-- -‘..- I ' --D 1 !IR 7 ; 4i4 r, / i 1r= J:Ki:::iNgi:: t s I z 1 1 - . .......-- 01110:;:;:;:iitii:ii;:;:■ - M •6°°D CH3 N lailirin 0 I.5■ 111=1w4#1:544"Als=sateneadieussamsinIzat ..., nems. • eig , 1 a __________ ___ ___il u_6acej.. _ 4 _t_ Lt a "Li V 5 di II i MIS. 124=-1----- BrINgAV VOW:MI.13 fli we EXHIBIT D A & B 15 it t ' - [ a0i s$C 51 °p� y i F 4- ¢Q: 6 u S3 o s y Ft?p .;If 05. In 3 r p S{ y € - i �' 3El i 1- :i - 52 a• +-. li . V 5 ° t. B i q 5 E _ ' = 5 B E j@ pa• ��� z 5 a .; - - 8; :.. 3 iibR °4 ¢ cF tiee ij 3%5 r�[g I g ; _ . °Ida 5 11M id a=3E.1 14E4 Puq[yj ,,i1• S Q Y6 gi d € E3EE3S 9 3f �ead EE.�46 Efipa f2i�y ESggF QSd SJ 99 o E n § FiiF g"c�€ iiss eYe` 33 3 $ €A 493]6 RR g sE y . E o 1 :. 3 Ri E nOf ni" 3 m F W. o e o ? E . o o ...2, q!� . F g ` it ° E3 le $°7 t s" E .oa d ° ar Ea $ 14 ssEq 7,1 hill IT. rig i gg55 e a 4 s E 5 i 3 g R -* $ d . - a � v s R 8 v ig4 a its i°29a i'."i ,t58'E 1812 i �. gSY�a Fp¢•r mil s f p Ir Ali 4 10 ph `q syg° 'Bi` 5$3 Al °E fu $ i n u E , ! i s tiF 5 x pp Fts t 1... .°s.� F:.F 25 iE 1 s1�spSE 1;11 4' f ii141$ggs F WA E ! 1 15/111'E E pi. E€.F g115;51 i��i�i}=. 4cii Iy.F . E 4 !li� HI E.,.i .i;ge EMI 111 x 81 g d' 8 5 _ c 6 ° e G iii iPEii !31 @Q ¢4B Mt 19; y14-1Fia3 i a =14 € o °' E a i" S i 3 ill ipeE°' §9 66 5'e ;' hi! 5F'4e¢_a°t p . Yi.<• n > i i W .g a u;- 3 /5p E- gg 5 °a-a44c} i F u S' S ° ia8= /pig With Sc°s3s °_:e p3yE° iy' � i• „ - ` Y e i ; g 0 pi Y g 3i s2dPa $i}2 @4E i 11. Ill r3221gi? is 7 _ B i . 3 i ei a. al el E : Yfi ° s2ea4 i l e 8s OSINIE- i`F ti 1 g a a 3f i a F �a s Ye a f B 1' @ IN F @@ 5 M4$t jp i$° c_ s I I 3 E C ji'' c 3 3 8'7 E3 S Ft € ii 44 iE & 11 4 4E[ 4a i4,.�� i� g' jHIii1h!; Jijjik 111 tg E b e 855gg� ®. E @3 g � ,p @c ai� ps 4qS' &i i•'y ` ° i¢ i 4 �v '+ e: " S?i ji! : i ° a h l a a 8'6:M t g m E i ' = S9e .5 a . a ® 1 es=iis ii �,qi Mid a s E iis43iii9 x N 3. {pq1�J ■ v \ _ °J K qs w 3 + U � Q� w` ICI ICI , 0 -_ ° {al iri` r 40 I I I 1 1 W , �� _ '° ® I I I I I I . .... 78 ---4 sue' -- -fib • /� r 1 °o • { PU - - \ s I 1 i FO`s ��99 .j I - ca c ILW : . a a it !0 a �y �q t/� , r c k l h E i in I I 641,H>134„ i I I ,I 1IP r C KNN Ai 1� -T —T T D • E� - T, – n �r 3pN3AV vONVMLL3 0 9 a N N• p EXHIBIT E H Dz • � _ A & B416 4 gth I ::: °41 a 14,;L at .g r8 t u 2'-2 11! 0 11) I - 9 it El-cniT; • . I 22 gig ,g, Alb ; 91] ? E 1 ,a • a, a a 11 . Ill fp ei: 0 t• .1/4.-., "4'1 41• ff Pull._ ti u i 1 a ki: 1-arzri-, :?: 2 CT--- i 02 -°' . g i i 11 li IL2 5 _,„, _ 2 1 at 1 9 5 ; & ; 3 I 5 " c -.. f v D ;MD. !- IL z E 6 ID =t.) '—.‘ ‘21 -1,-. ° 2 0 Y 0 g < o 21 I ,„ -9 ii is E `31 - ....3- .a _= --.2 Es „ 8 E < ta 6 5; 1 - I ,;at .E2. &a L;ea-'AM 'Pe' --,,-mr4.4.*-4-,„' _H.;la, ' .„,_..4.9,•- ' c u J / irtift", "A,0i..9111.--L...-Vv•.../,,,,. jar 3 ..1,,,,":„„4,47,,nrn_ft,w5er,_,-,7„?,4„,...74.711 reti,.„..ww-s.„ .. lc, '',,tre,r1:7--- 441.._ce_• 1-1--e; .".'Ctin;4.1W 4.`--$4`-nW4' ',..t%,21319,\VA. I ' . i{i,r3 -:k.g'3'="'‘':IA 1 ' ' 12V, ta 7:-S d',,,at'---" 4fr.v,..g_,4-,.• ^.ni,._fa,,g o g tcy, 0 0 m .g FA .,Ii..• -!---#4---,---,-IT-7iritti-- Lit,: 2-41 - ts i“e.-.rtt. ., Ir. ,§ 0 u --1 Abc- - 8,- 9,-..57,-'99,•-•/.. .7",W47" . 4.9. ...2.1:919e9S- 9 y 14,,,, T. i 1,...' ;..7.2 -,...t---"."-tif iitliter4,-;"-;kontrtqr4.7,7,eical--"z4 1 =-. 4,f.. ..,_ ::...• , U ,x 1-- -:1= '.!-• tIrsa' r rat a '''' ' '''%J.Tiffr°-z,,,.t.:-Z., 1 hsEltliili ,. irE - t -5 'AI 4 1 , 1 444 kr ' ni\r,t ., •91"95:11.5 7 c'ti"ti-9.2.Z'r ..• ' - ;', . -„ 4 a , n-0, ;65! ..1.,,,- .. tb-,,,,,ffirtaip 4', pry„,...i.4e, tgr --'"...."1 -s■-4.1...." -.1St?'" • " ..-x 1 ,a4 iII4. 14-22"L“'--:. Lte,1'. • 'i'",,,„/c...t.;:tini,,":"-- i-•La; ..... ....„-„, ll ", 4a?'=. 2` .:.-25--"--; ' • 4 —rst ' j , n. “:... - , E Ill; ji I 0... .:41 -1 ,r... ,s. r, 4:4 .... , ., r c , .r, ,tirc.7_,....:wiLt.,,,,41 n,i ' ior.,,vithr, ,tri.r, pt. v i, ,,,,nr.;-ittgawre.--,411 1 .- 1. -i,. ".0.,,,v,iHc.ro,n.N..,- ,0/21*.-..,-i r, , 4 101 r i E 1 - ^ ^k .21)^:i;Ii^ ", ^r^Y--.: :-vcrk.t' r^:- :Lull '^,C,,;;I :t , Ca 5 III _, ;6_,4- ,, „":2:„•.4•'Tr_ T•c_iik:ert,424 ---1 r -161 itil„,7-8,A.Taqoar.,w., -- - - - c LJ 1:654.Notili'tat-t, wa-li---t- - 4 2ms),.--1 \ • . _,_ • -d a) D -•- • , \ • a) Ty t • , _ r4%-reTallciiii - „NBAV VOI<VM113 i I c a) o 21 i o > 2 . — -— -- - 1 " 4 ig ,, 00 ,.. C. Al :I n a x . A & B 17 i h., ., a a a w i z ,, - 2 _ E. a,. I A JhPhi! E ° i at �,. s . i s e ! i a 8'i ! 6GO6 y V0 d .6 e• 4a€ 4ac.i'4D4a40€ ® 2<` ._ t € LL - E^ h ea .oe t • LP 1 4pj3a F 1 9183;'11':' !:11121111 11 it s c `1aT€a5F c !€ ai3 aaat ° afss�sif3Ea o, Z a}Frijrs 3$'4 T ® d ® a Ct E n a 4€9 3€9£r9 �I tr., 8 % El Wing! g! 1---1 C 0' a _ 1 _ il ii _ ii R 4. II ® / 1 a * j g no w° • iin t � 4 ® r I:II l' .._., a Z ER 6 ra [C. if O . P O za aR. t iI mitiniiwnt IMMEILVVIImmor EXHIBIT F A & 818 tlll ba M i d z - — Bx ___ p It' Pr 3 i5= g e S ft aN o s s r r s r 23 i 2w.im 'As aI �`;44 �° ° .t a •,G. °av: aq a0' .0 are a e IM i« ��=mm .� s • ° i ; ^" Y1W 0;�` z e^ §e & 1 S" g 0. • o n o o o o a o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 0 o u a a o 0 0 0 0 4 EI h c I� i \ �] - 4 0 ....saiiiiiill c Ii 1 r s i e f g — _ j 0 o MI o y u v u AlAr_l_m1.4 ,_tLail o u o 0 o G G u o G a EXHIBIT G A & B 19 3 gf.i of a u i � — 8 E\.orN^ 5 -J Yc ;°z�< g h a .- J e ry t16 s.. K k e e 3 �k"z�: %� - ` s °uT�.Q �� 3 is 3 R W I.:lei "4o-@ •4et 4`c <V 4y' ad I® d nAsma 'r a "� "W o 4 a- a " .9W gib' d Uj • xy .. \' J y Y J co .•. IRO id o d ° '1 Ili!i;i C9 4.I;IIIIIII :;; w i Iis 1 'liirt .artiltill I IIIIIIIIII w I !I; 1 jiiiii�l$ii C iiiirlii ^Ii;€i 41i111 "rag �..1 OM :ni'_P'iinb'.. 'nrt;i^iini4Yi 111111'1°::% iiu4. 1.�., 1I1111I111 IpI 24e^u^i ,.'1 Q 14 , `!Fu i DI II,III,IIO:.iii a/ �fS:�: 61 ? � lk; ip"ci ^i� 11111111111111:?\: Nil 'i ;iii;ilii4i_. 1, v wl',I:' rtiii i iiull lei::.>: rtfl iiiiipnlii4ed l;ril:liiri;; dil„i;y ai.:; 1 ;l;iii,1 P°;illrt i\�s EG ${?� lOi:, • $ a/ i IB 'if lli� it-_� "i!� "!•eelip.•:.=.. - €.R' �St7 e� ;. III IIIIIIIII__,:- - ;il; rtlii� Ili _ iiRi Inr • ;. 0 li Ihull Ilfill::: >; > i t Willi _ ,,:: `c'I -- II1I� I .11 .,3 VIII IIIIIIIIIIil1 ::i; 1 �; ' ���i DIIIIIII iiil .i1111ii�oii�i�mi��IUioliiii i l! .nlIIfl101 iic 1 \UUU: V 4111 MI111111111 _ ii l�"" lEmAiJ il�j °■��i a c ili i m= i.p .... �IIIIIIIIIIII.;.; i`l II 1- ,ter W Illmlr 3 a a iiiil o W 1- 2 J iii iI _ J. t.. li"ilI W 1111111 II II II III I 6 I 1 ••• H Ill 1. —:I l!''I 11111111§ N I.IR>M�1-.r l ill W !�'� W:1: W ii'tiill:... i2ll _ ii!!1 1i�4��i 6. I i ielll Ill �4::i r: Mill . I I 1. IIII ' .I IYIIIIIIIII�.:nN iill 1 .1 f— I1 I — Ili_ \k� — n. in.:.�:: (Al "I - 1;i .I �: is— I I 1. ll�llllll 1.- I I 1. I — I i�l� 1 1 .1 ,.lr'l , III:: 1.: 1 Ir�l����rtiii.. I— III, .., iill 1. IGIIIaIIII . 1. I . 111101111-1011:001011 dl.. till 'AI fi;i;;il;!ii; iii[iii.. ii: � _ ire•:: l ' iiiiii 1111 _ ;iv !ii € s'rsi h�I 1 +:; ""'" ;:.:, e:,," ili:�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIes — iax €iii 1111iiiiiiii" — r.•s 11 -, ic itiiii^i.. . I1il i2'5:.. 111/11111k.._ itiiiiii 1. I "fit • EXHIBIT H A & B 20 RX - m k 3 ogz s — v �Ir b : $ e $ r se .' , ., , ,,,‘,cg,,,,,' F e , 3 II .� nap., 4?g 4, ,. 4;- ® ih r im;n ,_� '� a a @e y a E g a 's_ § a _ • rii I : w D i;i rt !L i aI'eI rn illiritliilitr$1111 ILII_VIC 'a I�° II Q i l z iihi'" ;€I ►ii ;;nl l �ii 1111111111 : i l; CO '141:I:I 1111"h iiiriii its:;. 0 I IIIIII.ii1 ...i! III(! a> 111111;1.::, C>Iiii p ^D I = ii i IIIc;-r... CD — I.—_ 1 _ a ay CD i1il II I x: % IIIIIIiII — 1111111 —%!==_ ' •l — 'i¢ ' iii%.. ; ; :.::•. :I!i NA ill .. MM E iii[ iiiii€i,: � . IIIIII ll' 1,11111 I i ii. . o a y IIIII _ W I aiii W paD � i, ` ii 4N W i'l'g .;Il II _ g i;i IFS- i qg 4 O; i qfilluiiiiiiii i:,l ea 1 0 A & B 21 • til b a a a a t =v — a .. d' � I ; j " a4 Ai € . - - 9 g¢gg W B �� s k k K a Y :5< _ i •I y m 4 4 1E X " g EE i ¢4 <5 4o-i 45 4tr 45 ® I:a r��ma ,:� `"" i - rW `� 0 3 wog am • /4) 1 r / a F$ , /Sit ,_/� �_ am • H 1 1 ; - w MIMI j • . 7 , . , . . . L 1 \ { 1 ....[ . I *.41 - Par • EXHIBIT I A & B 22 [r65-fi,P(C IL) mw,o-u¢ap•rw,o-novp • 6rPa-61U1 XI N .E.F..t- .worm-. m., Ndid JNIU'VIJJ 5 §E 6pp[, I(O6 ntl :- 3N0H lYtl3N11d 03S0dONd c i - xvx.%wtl,ri1M 6161 31O°�'"'AS �'dflld30N00 i 4 0@ I 1N3NI3OVNVN IDS =KIM wu ,>3mw suaur� orwvm €S 9 U 3 ; i p °` :63 kp• 1•\\ eS I S_ L- [ _ 5 O 8g e• _� 1 -I @ pPp pPp pP vyvy 1€ 6 I P P $ R 9pgp ;33` �6 tiee�pa A AF4f4eFe Ad FF 4 G p frgi o 0 '� Pf Iry� I �gry [J p @ '' pg'S l hi: ! ili 1. mil [��i } s ~®@ `g— t ' i S - e " yi99i 1[ i 25 B e3v F @83 Ail mil ® a p e I ° _ " a _ /�ry .pap] Sp'F 3S-.' [ s ' a I I JJ dI� I 'ie�ipOC ��e� �i � Id A 7 I II �: :gar I�aa9l �6$e�f6g�i I— a I 1 I 11 J, 1 !u{ / 1 \iiLL < 1 f tN3wdo 3naan w; 1 mil' 111 1 / ; m, ._ S ...,.. . �. • g I $ \ -a J1 spa ; I-" ,4-in 1. `.I a 1._a""m¢) „ `rs 7; noun- p. .. 1 ,4 m o vxmm mw.a \ l�xounm-oe g9 \..�. • W del hi I -.. I *P� aas vb ca y x x.. t 1` Z 4� lk m L I II-II Ill S"= ' a'r.�`•'r, 3 ,— 4 s l ,iatt, -,. J;'� -. o "g 3 e O 0I 1 I / ,4 L,k rF' 4.,_, �,, �i g.,evict s ,'yt' as .4 r +� 1 g'". et ?w § I J ,,,'".t, �°i1 a ' 1 0,00.4.. `�..,i7-t _1 l,,,,,. , p .7 _ Q '� tNal � �' r ! xss 1 111 9_ ® �� ,„14 ,11 , s :® ^; X56 ® . W ee a 41 1 F� , ∎^0.' . y in "k 2 R e� 'i.-- �a 11 i'.11 " {f 4 y °yhl'r�d�IX .��y iSdFl,4 i s � x��� �1 'km., O 6 S� ~ ISI�TT' �jI^;'�'( 1 lr+} 1q'�'m -rid„ "Si��'.m ,., F° J�-w e isc _ r a I �g I �p __ S ;, ' j' ` L.I R�°� ❑O'",� fb ®� H ?3 p T 'ty b? -- _i 5 l lei �/1 3 g I "arm: +r. ,`% 'a ct ar. - Q,O ppIICC a — �1 I 1 • 11,-a-� ,i, .,..,m `^ et r _ 1:�� r 1 1 w ap 'It'll bq'�. I I '' .7 ©—' Ii .+ .— I h5 r r 13 Itll •r 35 i a- g 1,,,...4,---• I „log; it t 1 {S -. ' b f 3 i� -r I -Ii HH ;3111,4a I IIIIII I: '- I I� 7 r'W:,e: % tl I [c. 1IuI `� TV ,�� 1 1, 40 k \),; J'�4 .4490h,p 02 C"; ' of . i j,),71 ijj_1 1_ r-j ... .1 'L.: ,L)-.=h,z-y. :- —", '' . - LA. 'c.--.;. ! 1 7/ ` �I 6 - • -5' . s ` ,.� -3f1N3�V VQNVMIi3 :... mJ I EXHIBIT J �:�" IZL£91 ON 111 1,1;,` 't A & B 23 nes-aIS(rixl mm��Imy4 o10-110 r] arso-eiui xs'uoiviw -7--.--t, NV1d ONI0VH0 1Vf11�ONOO a 75.� N - ersori MO oe =� MOH 1V i3Nfli 0350dO8d (+I,� IIII^^ ��++ d I - xvxvure Imry c[sI SIYOLLJ�J E 6 4 U p `, 1N3W3OVNVW IOS WOOD Pa user. swvwn >wrro 6 rs ! olti .• I.., 3i .s r = • i Tar e f: I i. P !3 u P �' !n Phs sS P l0 i' �y�C=L r'l 1 P. fi i6:; I, ,_*[.. ,...1.. . t_,_ $. e: e IMPV.1 _ 1 11 ♦: fljt 4e i j b i Y ,_?rli €p 1 3a6 � 1 d7tr ' z�= Q '! ;F pl 11-e 5 €• ti6 , 1 g 14 k- . r is d �� ya '1 P t' ilII LI to a .is- �r p i -; ,' 0 . ?' a� h --Tk nu ,� il , , 1E e E e '-F , ' =11 JI 1 ,, 1 CE aS K Ia j i -I I- I. `I n 111=1-!I Uhl =R; F. P L k s -- ry Ir n • P Pp I! . A-&--B-24 7. -yF j' q . )7F I E.. o El' c El' 41 1 till > o ! f ' ilii °iii;.g g• m ° H. �6 i if�g q 32! :0'. t 1 i Itp o OF: rRI ry c n s s ry • . i{Nei Dr-{[1Aig c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ry .ry . . . f . OC�k[tE ai' _ . RI t i . P . . . : , r ;U1 bU : : : w e . : ji It cl • 7 • a A a a d a a a a c 7 a a a -aor:la5 A 5 an A A . „rt.:: ,,, A 4 0 A 4 A . . . . , . . ,_.. _ ^ 5 1 J I 3 . . . . • . n . . . . c . . . . e . . . aC=y.l a 7 ry . ry a a 7 C=4 . . ry . - . n . _ i . .;P . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n . . . . • • �=�/U fj�J EXHIBIT K A & B 25 January 23,2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Planning and Zoning 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 RE: New Funeral Home at SE Corner of Etiwanda Ave. & Candlewood St. To Whom It May Concern: This letter serves as a narrative of day-to-day operations for the proposed funeral home as referenced in the application for a Conditional Use Permit. ■ The proposed hours of operation are Monday-Friday 8:00am to 5:00pm with four(4)employees on staff and 10:00 am to 4:00pm on Saturday and Sunday with a reduce staff. During a funeral service there will be additional staff provided as needed based on the size and type of service. Services will be sporadic, with an anticipated maximum of three per week, and will generally occur between the hours of 10:30am and 4:00pm. Visitations, when requested, are usually held the evening prior to a service from 6:30-8:OOpm and typically have 30 persons in attendance at any given time during the visitation. It is anticipated that the Fire Dept.will have access to the site via Candlewood, future access to the historical house on the corner and access from Etiwanda. It is anticipated that limited if any visitor traffic will enter or exit the funeral home parking from or to Candlewood given the main entrance/exit is at Etiwanda. The funeral home facility will not include a'Prep Room",the traditional area where embalming and body dressing is performed. All body prep of the deceased will be performed at one of our"Central Prep°facilities which handle all of our embalming and body prep for our funeral and cemetery operations in the Inland Empire. The majority of body prep and dressing for this funeral home will occur at our prep facility located within Draper Mortuary at 811 North Mountain Ave., Ontario or as a back-up location at our prep center within • Atcheson&Graham Mortuary at 7944 Magnolia Ave, Riverside. This funeral home at Etiwanda Ave.and Candlewood Street will not have a crematory. All cremations will be performed at our crematory located at Mt. View Mortuary& Cemetery at 570 East Highland Ave. San Bernardino, CA. Routine deliveries will be made via both Candlewood St. and Etiwanda. The delivery of the deceased to the funeral home will be by an enclosed van or funeral hearse directly to a roll-up delivery door located at the back of the building and unloaded inside the building. The loading and unloading door will be approximately 210 feet the centerline of Candlewood and approximately 250'from the nearest residential lot At the completion of a funeral services the casket will be loaded into the hearse under the cover of the porte cochere which is 175 feet from Candlewood and separated from residential lots by another commercially zoned lot. The deceased will arrive on the day of a visitation or funeral service or possibly the evening before if the funeral service will be performed in the moming. Potentially a deceased could be at the funeral for two nights in the event the family schedules two evenings of visitations and a funeral service the next day or if for scheduling requirement the funeral is set for two days after an evening visitations. In cases where the deceased is housed at the funeral home ovemight the deceased will be embalmed. A motor escort will be present at the funeral home to lead a procession to the cemetery, as well as providing for traffic control on Etiwanda Ave. where the procession will exit directly onto Etiwanda traveling either North or South depending on the route to the cemetery. • In the event, the family chooses not to have a motor escort to the cemetery, than a map to the cemetery will be provided and participants will proceed in advance to the cemetery.The hearse will then proceed without escort to the cemetery at the appropriate time to arrive at the scheduled grave side service. Clearly there will be no procession in the event the deceased is or has been a cremated. At the end of a funeral service the number of people and vehicles leaving the facility will be to that of a small neighborhood church after a Sunday service, lasting an average of five (5) minutes. Sincerely, Dann C. Narveson, Vice President • SCI California Funeral Services, Inc. • SCI MANAGEMENT L.P. 1929 ALLEN PARKWAY•P.O.BOX 130548•HOUSTON,TX 77219-0548•(713) 525-7380• FAX (713) 525-3008 www.dignitymemorial.com EXHIBIT L • A.. • 03/08/12 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DRC2011-01094 DRC2011-01094D NAME ADDRESS PHONE NQ9x-u b\\.� jt a6nt4ev, lla Q4r- ciDci- 8-99-7744 n- vv. cicfi Wlr .7 S-11 +L2,vr.c/',f.PL.) (J %e I Sn 075 4 at.o�t 5(4 (se/at 1va.✓,o-c Pe-v ,ws 7c2:74- Ern(mat t1_Q-x ?0 9- 6KG- '.I to ,Cq e &r_ c& Q-t-( A/6_s yj7'" '7 �� •-):�.� /'G - ited% 9/7.15* 9d9 -re' 7pil, S 7�a h'SO4 ad go- 6�9% n - • • r . . so PIL sr s t, l.. �� _ taro !eight - 0 • ads-v.v.-FP 61 tit <z9* SPEC/I yer, R.c__ (3*a)cor-z.gps Alien A lma In r 'i S r-rrtq A1OUn`L,n Z)r 9©9 572 69P kc.i k ;Tow I a$11 (real vol at ' 9o?(94- - ° }� Zirace /ia..rildtez- J3036 Inaitect effr I ce 6,441'057 SK na n v© k ' • 1M41 /`aan naa 0 9'4 =1`;I -111449 Tarwes. Ha>'En' -t 12—5(. ColoNigi C,Z4- Y/- 7c/a7 sA► ...c. "1 1 -= WL414 41-7=1 33 1 tst (k-kraiMpitz,t 73 g tin tracguta; QEe( 7-C?9t `!Ze )3 4-,tr- - ia o-- d) 77 •^ -Zi5 7 s'Y(- 5' 7-Ova 1 WS 14/ >J-(062.. W attatit / A ra't739 g4gg3713 C 6} /t, 01 ,7 & 1101 �cfb3 � t(? � \x-w // _l__ Sr- Mu;$\eur. \25a G°( t l fit- q' 9t -R'Q 4303 PAGE 1 lath 12'983 6uWu-6Q A� - • Cele ) S -5'1'03, • � '``al % 'mazer Z1fgb £ot nw eJaeyv nog) x15 - EXHIBIT M A & B 27 03/08/12 • NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DRC2011-01094 DRC2011-01094D /k -7-7-464.°I" J2,7nn fi�acnr `e-.471c- iP .c , 9by 7 Z°- s3 - NAME ADDRESS PHONE .s i r d d fy akK? (ICI 6 S l g03)e74'y n ll (( ---- 7Itt t30 KJec.-. t o w ( no , rt 1 4dI, -i 127af cotcw—Ie Dr 'Mt/VW-CI yvoNnJ - pc.oaa, 74a.r.En^-+n. - r✓, . `10/.-.4 f06 - 7°471 1 ✓, � @' o at • tt-A j- iP ' 777 2° r. , - Y' ? Ear L, k 9160s ti WAJ QL ?GI- zz� -Po8v nfr r,4vc'' 7Y29 f{ot.r4,.-r+rn-r 1-re_ 9,7- 0034-64' 04/A- 72 cfrtM Silvzr Il-&Sc..cwt-- 9 Vi 70 / 42O y j, e c. l(! a (, it a °7 7,.'I. eft e efri, If G A & Pie L i - .., c.....yt2°i -.•.�i . s- . 1 mss ,_ . �;; - 7, /. ! . /, . / '3 0711141") 1 ' r� RkN Q- 17Th;P ‘. 1.1150 r:.�,. No...-�.1,-,b.` Vi-Ce9?S-(y i1x�+-A- SAN,„ / culc 'rr zyc - qesq -9.2/1->-7€Av 0145104 (LEA a 0-425 0ua' c 9!'434 98q G Alb- 004 IAN/IA Ueda t2Rnc (Owl • G'{' 9/739 5*a bc&, ola re uC i-k-as yater 0 1288 3 Eft ov.ce D c. C°Lact1 aoo-g ,3 ,ctt" --n � omoun -�I a3 g ; s. .e-t Or (_el c�) 7 3 a-i i-o — na-NA cc Kr 2r oh- �+-Z(3 6 ao kad Or b(ol ta-mo ' - . B?e„r 'Mra crew_. t 9 (-u5 E,,ls_Q_'t e c( - 35 o q 'Riess • _. 2-4 __--a - p;54e1 7Jia.� 12 ' 7o 6I[ 909- 472 - 498/1 a H 2k� )2-4 )12 6ua'J cd fe9 — 3 — 96 3 Q;. Lam„ b98a C 3 - �7 r' z Sao w P! Gu Zoe 4,1 sob 19a54-fl (amer la 2 q s am Cn,.w✓ r P% 62-4 6c c vyoe" E2711--e c' /3-- 12-92) e"41 Ct f,7 Sc 3 -sccc wk- ! ; -1 >- & a L v- qei 3 )4t- '73 r-c,,,,o,,,,- AN.Arettep.N.,,, ke\A-LA keiDel 0,- ece-t-t-et°1/4 et viti • Dcre Final ingru,4 )21's oAa° °A- ?-y a=tssf R A & B 28 • 03/08/12 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DRC2011-01094 • • DRC2011-01094D NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1 � r eE I _ I as • .�� )4 Lint . 12 rri1;0 •fCASsWn I 1t44d c2EST-V-IE Cr 44Q-y85- 18- 'G� ✓4�� cos-1,1 12, Ll I2 A7 Go(L,q,� LQ 4-gi�pp ` Q5 2p37 5-.5-7k, . ult`.a FQO j277 tu wb41 -eta ltq 'Tact �n DS q0;-), ail fC Pr Apse MWCO 7111,4 -S�.vi'yate k 1)y `l 1 7-7 7 I°/ -913-3°°( kL3 Ka lftio 1 U /2412gtiPet. ic'M oa!rt c r4Q ,M s 75/ !, �i9�) A0 }2.� C, .y173 7s-t).3, Ruil r %Olt ioq- 6,9c-7/9% qoq flf �`IO= 4 Les X73- rr Le cif Dr _ ea-yi- %nu - r 76/t 9A N_rvi Plays j 12$ $n CRk,t tu.of1u,,t0; pa owl 805 ; 110 D/ta:t tott L 2 7 _k t 0- S Pfe t 0� tit `( A,*k) 0 2--eptis fi Acc cc° /CC ca 7 W'"31At t✓`r..c-c- c C%7J9 PPP P72 2,0si, r1 ... 7 , A./ fl L, Gcogi 35 104 , . _`4. r OBI 4 �21ST1.,JA Skt- id Mom)J 122•6 G Re.4 �r Rc . tlr73� q -2g -((fib 2i•�TIsfsu ` 1!►, . r. G .i '7 /�. Si.AVAL. 4 w \ L : /g41 C,hr` 0, h ,C kuvn& Th.L.f2drnal c' Re. • ' 11'7'3q 1O' Ad 7631 E,..uay P(. R ,C, 9173, 961-qq3-73a41 G42r mss-3167«. y Pt- It G C-rgtq te-, 01 071'v 2JJ - Joe?6 e•a 7-53/shearpliaes-,9? _4-4 C M2173 5 t909-100-307/3 R IG61 711-04 ) a-o awitn� C �DL - _233-aI NO L,u<52 C rr r'Z - t2 nt v7th ):avota- P1- ,d-/Jr kc.1te c s- y/ 7c i Vi,vl T4.,9,/vt2sr /ZA„96 K/dv,e -' k zit 4/73f 9-Pf7 10(41UGsi- ,Aj'tx Oita. cznyr-ncise, , ,,, 4�.Y 3w 'G�-- / 144'12 6A; ' 0) -7 w- 76c o a r x�n1 )uTAy 1291'E3 bAatTUo7-ac.+ 0R. f2C CA R r 7 301 fi56 (316-57.575(/ PAGE 3 a L IS/A r..tAC.L�t,G2}} 942_0 I3 �Go W Watt , R, CA 8. 1131 q ligOek • �eE a oftZ 75 Z.:6 C3`-'ngaio.1a w•.y , Planck° Cocw+o• 81 Q64 1t o. Catkewu `N 7338 WkJmsJu V n, C C k.g `ZQ ST-ec.t� Gti>itsv�(i -GUc�,.('P� 12-517/ 12filiat cuc A4Q- 173y 4ortir A & B29 Wu)) N o L �dldr 1-ko�K Mash gm; i�SS\ T. eiA�t, RC ci G \-7 s i (90°0 646 <59c13 . l� pci oL otr e-c cagv-73°1 Coto °D 6i 6 o°,tO ) w( Mbl.ineaq- t2,44 ^,.,CD.E. - P_C q tZ3ci . Oted -to `l.% • zs ph T Ruosse/l 75/0 erziwAel f J t 97!3 9 S`fl -Si7'0avl \jic-tovA tor MU}ENye} "7540 Gwf-Jrw PL Etc 413-a c} le& 1°52437-3-3 fCac'r u rytz ttonpi I _ 75'40 CtftMA°) R PL ►°-0 qt-I3c 'Wet ebb i�llls Barak 751 bxIue Pt ; RC 91739 909, 803. 02t5.e/ si{;Pjo vure 2 754// Exhm PL. PC 9i 739 , goy. go3, 2/ ( ;M Dtidle.( 0331 5he.)67p Rc '7f034 `16y -50$-ilvl /{ /v,vn4,i∎ 0331 5he(6v Pc- W3 puc °Ie1) a Debo-4 , Vr ()et. -\eta 4 e Z3 \ Ott-Cm Ai _ ��it� t C o Yt C`tos o3-0?3 to uS9WANT Sii.r4H AH1 Plo91 DA_ 2c yI137 ''7H-"T13- 833 • • , • • 4 A & B30 • II I HMR Architects AIA • 221 main street suite i huntington beach california 92648 (714) 536-2009 fax (714) 536-3669 March 16, 2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Attn: Mike Smith Re: DRC 2011-01094/01094D: Neighborhood meeting. Mike, I have attached the sign-in sheet for our neighborhood meeting that took place on March 8th I will summarize the meeting. Brad Buller (Applicant's local representative), who acted as master of ceremonies for the meeting made the introduction of the project team. The project team consisted of Dann Narveson (Applicant's corporate representative), myself (Architect) and Glen Abercrombie (Applicant's local representative). Also in attendance was the Owner's • traffic consultant. Dann Narveson spoke first and was interrupted within 5 minutes of his presentation by public opposition to the entire concept of a funeral home at the subject site. Brad Buller then proceeded to ask for specific questions from the public. The next 90 minutes consisted of more statements than questions and the general tone of the remainder of the meeting was that the public does not want a funeral home in this location. The meeting was then adjourned after no more public questions arose. The applicant was not able to present the project's operations, architecture, traffic or public improvements and was not asked any questions that related to any of these subjects directly. If you would like to discuss the meeting or have any questions about our project please contact me. Sincerely, HMR Architects • William Reseigh EXHIBIT N A & B 31 • • Planning Department, City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Mike Smith P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ATTENTION RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION: Building a FUNERAL HOME amongst historic homes, the historic Joseph Filippi Winery, the historic Barbara's Tea House, the banquet hall Etiwanda Gardens, upscale mall Victoria Gardens, and residential homes valued from $500,000 to 1.5 million dollars will MORIFY and UPSET local businesses and home owners. Dear Mike Smith and fellow Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, Please do not allow a funeral home to be built in the this beautiful community (Southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street - APN: 1100-031-07). No other city in the world could combine historic homes,the historic Joseph Filippi Winery, the historic Barbara's Tea House, the banquet hall Etiwanda Gardens, upscale mall Victoria Gardens, and residential homes valued from $500,000 to 1.5 million dollars in one marvelous place. You have done a wonderful job of creating this city and you owe it to yourselves, the businesses, and the residents who have bought into your vision to protect what you have created. • My family and I have invested in Rancho Cucamonga, twice in our lifetime. We would not live anywhere else in the Inland Empire, but this consideration of building a funeral home mortifies and upsets us! My family and I DO NOT WANT A FUNERAL HOME BUILT NEXT TO OUR HOME! Since hearing word of a funeral home being considered for development next to our home, my family has stopped all improvements on our home. There is no point investing or raising a family next to a funeral home. Like every community with a funeral home, this community will become depressed and abandoned. The funeral home will likely do well because of the surrounding beautiful community, but the local businesses will undoubtedly suffer and deteriorate. I foresee the banquet hall Etiwanda Gardens (across the street) becoming the 2nd funeral home. if this one is allowed to be built. This funeral home is EXPLOITING our vulnerable and beautiful community during our city's difficult financial crisis. I urge you to defend the businesses and residents who have invested in your vision to create the most desirable community in the Inland Empire. Sincerely, Dr. Nelson Butay, D -L•nh Phui. Bailey Butay (3 yrs), and Adam Butay (1 yr) • 12943 Bartholow Dr., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 EXHIBIT 0 A & B 32 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUL 1 6 2012 RECEIVED - PLANNING July 13, 2012 Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Permit DRC2011-01094 HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICE Dear Sir, My name is Charles Kao. I'm the home owner located at 12816 Crestfield, Rancho Cucamanga, CA 91739. About quarter mile from the said HMR site. I want to express my disappointment and strongly oppose against the proposed DRC2011-01094 HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICE Permit case. Since I'm travelling can can't attend the July 28, 2012 public hearing. Please register • my rejection vote. It's a bad environment violation in the residential area. My California driver license # ia . Phone # is 510-432-0678 Email address is ckao168@gmail.com. Current mailing address is 47628 Avalon Heights Ter, Fremont, CA 94539. Please keep me posted on this event and let me know anything I can do to block this permit from passing. Also, please use this letter as my vote against it. Many Thanks, Charles Kao Home Owner, 12816 Crestfield Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 • A & B 33 Victoria Bloom, Ph.D. • Clinical Psychologist License No.PSY14866 1300 Bristol Street North, Suite 175, Newport Beach, CA 92663 (949) 474-8494; inbloom4 @verizon.net Mr. Michael Smith CITY OFRANCHO Ct1CAMQpGq Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive JUL 2012 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 1'6 July 9, 2012 RECEIVE® • PLANNING Dear Mr. Smith: I am writing on behalf of clients that I treat, regarding, as I understand it, a proposal to construct a funeral home in their neighborhood. I am treating my clients for issues revolving around grief and loss, and I believe the proposed facility, sited near their home so they encounter it on a daily basis, would be particularly disruptive to their states of mind and course of treatment. Severe psychological trauma can be devastating and last many years. Additionally, it is my opinion that the proposed facility could • have a negative impact on any other resident dealing with any of a host of psychological problems including anxiety, depression, trauma, and grief. Itshould be noted that these are not uncommon psychological problems. I urge you to give consideration to my clients' situation, and identify alternative sites. • Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, Victoria Bloom, Ph.D. • • A & B34 LOS QUADRO RO • City of Rancho Cucamonga Monday. July 9, 2012 Planning Commissioner Richard Fletcher PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Re: SO Funeral Home planned for Ed wanda Ave Mr. Fletcher, interest Sunday's Daily Bulletin quotes you as stating you "have not been approached with concerns about this project". Over 300 residents verbalized their concerns about the funeral home at the March meeting at Etiwanda Gardens. I was there. The SCI and City teams present were inundated with concerns from the residents. At one point, a resident asked a City representative if"you would like a funeral home in your neighborhood?" and the rude response of"I didn't buy property near a vacant lot" served only to increase the opposition's rancor. The residents spoke vehemently against the use of the property for a funeral home. The only glimmer of hope was the willingness of one resident to help the SCI team locate a more suitable location. Many of us were hopeful that was an option under consideration. In addition to the property devaluation and the"haunting factor"as mentioned in the newspaper story, the opposition stated several other reasons the neighborhood objects to a funeral home: 1) The traffic during school days backs up the full 1/2 mile below Baseline on Etiwanda every morning for an hour, and every afternoon for an hour,for dual-school drop-offs and pick-ups. 2) The already high traffic levels on the Etiwanda Corridor brings shoppers, diners and movie-goers to • Victoria Gardens and Bass Pro Shop, which creates more than enough traffic and noise on this busy street. 3) The traffic on Etiwanda and surrounding streets will increase due to funeral visitations and processions. The processions will become a daily visual nuisance and traffic nightmare for the residents. 4) The noise from the 15 freeway is so loud and bothersome, that more noise from funeral home vehicles, guests and processions is unwarranted and punitive to this community. 5) It is incompatible to place a funeral home within th mile of the 604 Kindergarten through 5t° grade students that attend Grapeland Elementary School on Etiwanda Avenue. 6) It is incompatible to place a funeral home within 1,000 6th, 7`h, and 8th grade students attending Etiwanda Intermediate just North of Grapeland. 7) Etiwanda Gardens provides luncheons, weddings and occasional funeral services. It seems their modest involvement in providing funeral services is unobtrusive, and not an issue for the neighbors. Further,the Gardens' ability to provide this service more than adequately handles the funeral needs of our • neighborhood. A city-wide need can he met elsewhere. The intrusion of a funeral home and its related activities into this family-oriented community is an unnecessary detriment to the families living here. The tax-paying, property owners of this neighborhood deserve the respect of the City. My community should not bear the burden of the Planning Commission's desire for a funeral home. Sincerely, - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA au•. .4ta.•s slau @ :vioo.com JUL 1 1 2012 cc: City Council Members RECEIVED - PLANNING 7441 HavenhurstFlPlktcc 35ancho Cucamonga CA 91739 Untitled July 3, 2012 • Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91729 This letter is in response to the public hearing for a request to construct SCI Funeral Service . I' am-'AGAINST to this proposal from the beginning.i live in the area across this proposed funeral home. Our family home value is already greatly affected by the negative effect of bad economy and a bad housing market. Then you are are going to add this funeral home to this residentialarea. what would be left of us after many years . This funeral home will add to more reduction to the valueof our family home. what would happen also to the school close to it like the Grapeland Elementary which is rank # 1 in the state California. My child and all the other students effort will be gone to waste if you allow this f.home to be constructed in the said.The students will never forget this and it will have a negative effect on the way they study and the inspiration to be the best. Because people will give them a remark of a school near the funeral home. Even now my two other children doesn't like the idea of seeing the sign of a proposed SCI funeral home site whenever we passed by Etiwanda Ave. They said it is creepy and SAD. The church is different than a funeral home TOTALLY different if you think we are close to Sacred Heart Church. A church holds every function, wedding, baptism and funeral like happy and sad events but Funeral Home does sad events only and it will greatly affect the peaceful and happy community where my children will grow. • 5o,a-'big ""NO"!to this funeral home.They can go somewhere where they are far from a nice and quiet residential area where we live in. I am doing this letter to protect the future of my children and my family. Res ectfully yours, Mrs. Leonila Hem erm 5 lla and family 12805 Golden Leaf Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUL 0 9 2012 RECEIVED - PLANNING Page 1 • A & B36 Page 1 of 2 • Smith, Michael • From: Sheila Hemandez[shernandez35986 @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 2:39 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: NO MORTUARY ON ETIWANDA! To Rancho Planning Division To Michael Smith, Dear Mr. Smith, This letter is to inform you that I totally object to the project planned to put in a Funeral Home at Etiwanda Avenue next to the Post Office. After speaking to my neighbor about this who had spoken to you, she said you had instructed to write a letter to let you know how we feel about the proposed Funeral Home. WE OBJECTumf NO FUNERAL HOME/MORTUARY ON ETIWANDA—HOW SICKENING! A plan for such a business is absolutely objectionable, unreasonable, illogical, and irritating beyond belief that this city will stop at nothing to allow yet another business and into a NEIGHBORHOOD WITH KIDS AND THE ADULTS WHO BOUGHT IN to experience even more traffic and of such an onerous foundation to be part of a family neighborhood! • Who thought of this? Who there at your office would trade places with even one person this would affect? NO ONE that's who. The idea of tending to the dead is a horrific enough idea but to place in such an area is an outrage!!! I went to school, worked hard, and decided to move here with my family after much consideration from friends, real estate agents, talking to the local schools, and looking at the area in general. We moved with the boom, and thought we were "really" getting in to a nice, small-town community and feel in general to the immediate surrounding area. We attended a wedding at the Etiwanda Gardens, and have since been to memorials and funeral services there. That one corner area alone at Etiwanda Gardens leaves a feeling when driving by of the family and friends we have LOST, and whose services were held there in a really bad way. I CAN'T IMAGINE HAVING A FUNERAL HOME ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET! I CAN'T IMAGINE WHAT THIS WOULD DO TO THE ETIWANDA GARDENS WHEN HAVING A WEDDING OR TRYING TO COORDINATE ANYTHING AND DIRECTING THEM ACCORDING TO BEING "ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE FUNERAL HOME!" Oh my god--really? SICKENING. I don't want a double-sided psychological event going on when having to travel down Etiwanda Avenue. We moved here to be around other people, and even with the freeway 210 having opened and so many extra people we were told would never be here from all the extra living arrangements being made by this city in the form of too many apartments, condo's, and houses—the idea of having a home dedicated to dealing exclusively with the dead and services that go along with • that being just feet or even a mile from my home, is psychologically damaging and too much to take or ask from any resident here. A & B 37 7/10/2012 rage 2 of 2 You people are slimy, that you would try to sneak this in without everyone knowing about it! BECAUSE EVERYONE WHO DOES KNOW ABOUT IT DOESN'T WANT IT HERE! I can't even imagine what those living across the streets in the immediate vicinity would be forced • to deal with in seeing the cars, hearses—traveling with the dead bodies inside not to mention the coroner vans, etc. How the hell did idea get this far? NO ONE has thought this through. NO ONE WANTS TO LIVE NEAR A CORONER/FUNERAL/MORTUARY OR CEMETERY FEEL— IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD! STOP THIS NOW!!! S. Hernandez Bridge Water Dr., Etiwanda, CA 91739 • • • 7/10/2012 • A & B38 Page 1 of 4 Smith, Michael • From: Chris Downey [cidlreddbmw @hotmail.comj Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 3:23 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: re: NO mortuary on etiwanda and candlewood! Hi Michael. I AM DEEPLY OPPOSED TO MORTUARY PROJECT! SHAME ON YOU FOR NOT LETTING MORE PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT THIS--AS IT WILL AFFECT MANY, MANY, MANY MORE PEOPLE THAN THE FEW YOU NOTIFIED! IT WILL AFFECT THE ENTIRE AREA! IT WILL CHANGE HOW THIS AREA IS COMPLETELY AND WHO WANTS TO PASS THAT KIND OF CRAP BUSINESS BY ON THEIR WAY TO A DAY OUT AT THE MALL, TO THE POST OFFICE, TO SCHOOL WITH THEIR KIDS, OR ANYWHERE ELSE? GROSS. THIS BUSINESS HAS REAL AUDACITY IN TRYING TO SNEAK IN AN NOT TELL ANYONE ABOUT IT--SHAME ON ALL OF YOU:-YOU LIVE NEXT TO SOMETHING LIKE THIS! AND YES, WE ALL KNOW THIS KIND OF BUSINESS NEEDS TO EXIST--BUT FOR THE WORST PART OF LIFE--AND THEY NEED TO GO BE NEAR SOME OTHER CITY OR A CEMETERY--NOT A FREAKING NEIGHBORHOOD! I was told to email you so here it is. I put it together late last night and am very upset about this proposal. This is completely ludicrous to try to introduce this type of business into a neighborhood and outrageously insensitive. i don't know if you want it as an attachment or here in an email so I went ahead and cut and pasted it here...I was an am obviously VERY UPSET about this and was • TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL, Michael Smith and anyone else this involves... I COMPLETELY OBJECT TO THE MORTUARY PROPOSAL IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ETIWANDA, ON ETIWANDA AVENUE!!!! MY ENTIRE FAMILY OPPOSES THIS MORTUARY AND I AM GLAD WE CAME TO KNOW ABOUT IT BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE! (NOT THAT THIS CITY DID ANYTHING TO TRY TO BRING IT TO ANYONE'S ATTENTION IT HAD TO BEYOND THE TINY SECTION OF LAND WHEN IT WILL IN FACT RUIN THE LIVES, PROPERTY VALUES, AND AREA IN GENERAL WAY PAST THE NOTIFICATION AREA!!!) TO BE UP THIS LATE AT NIGHT HAVING TO CONSIDER THIS OBSCENE PLAN TO PUT A FUNERAL HOME AT THE AREA OF ETIWANDA AND CHURCH, LEAVES ME MORE THAN UPSET. I AM SO PISSED OFF HAVING TO DEAL WITH HOW UPSET MY WHOLE FAMILY IS AND NOW THEY SAY I HAVE TO SEND A LETTER TO TRY TO MAKE DIFFERENCE---WHICH I DON'T MIND DOING UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, BUT TO THINK OF THE "WHY" I HAVE TO BE DOING THIS IS MORE THAN UPSETTING! I WORK 14 HOUR DAYS AND HOPE MY CITY WILL KNOW HOW TO HANDLE ITS JOB WITHOUT FORCING ME TO BE PART OF IT---I DON'T SEE THEM HAVING TO DO, INTERVENE, OR "HELP" ME DO MY JOB, BUT HERE I AM WITH THE REST OF THE COMMUNITY PROTESTING AND HAVING TO HELP THE CITY UNDERSTAND SOMETHING THEY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN FROM THE OUTSET--TO NOT PUT THIS B.S. BUSINESS IN THIS AREA---AND HERE I AM ON THE 4TH OF JULY WRITING THIS OUT SO YOU HAVE IT BY THURSDAY! AND WE DONT THINK FOR A MOMENT THAT THESE FUNERAL/MORTUARY PEOPLE DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING IN TRYING TO INSERT THEMSELVES HERE INTO THIS COMMUNITY INTO A SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD THE WAY THEY ARE---THAT ALONE IS DESPICABLE THEY • QUOTE THEMSELVES AS "COMPASSIONATE," IF THAT WERE TRUE THEY WOULD NEVER TRY TO GET INTO AN AREA LIKE THIS. COMPASSIONATE, MY ASS. THESE MONEY MONGERS ARE HERE FOR ONE REASON ONLY—TO MAKE MONEY OFF THE PEOPLE OF THE ETIWANDA AREA OF RANCHO A & B 39 7/10/2012 Page2 of 4 CUCAMONGA AND WE DON'T WANT THEM HERE. • I USE ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL THE TIME TO VISIT MY FAMILY, GO TO THE POST OFFICE, GO TO THE MALL, GET TO THE FREEWAY, ETC. AS IT IS A MAINSTAY OF THE COMMUNITY, ALREADY! • EVERYONE TRAVELS ETIWANDA AVENUE INCLUDING THE SCHOOL KIDS AND THIS IDEA IS SO OBSCENE! KIDS...REALLY? HAVING TO SEE DEATH AND HEARSES AND CARS AND LIMO'S AND EVERYTHING ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED TRAFFIC AND DECREASED SAFETY FOR THEM AS THEY TRAVEL ON FOOT TO AND BACK FROM SCHOOL??? AND PUTTING THE PARENTS IN THE SITUATION OF HAVING TO RIDE BY THIS ON A TWICE-DAILY RUN??? THIS IS NOT WHAT THEY SIGNED UP FOR WHEN THEY BOUGHT INTO THIS AREA---AND YOU KNOW . IT!!! IN FACT, YOU COUNTED ON THEM COUNTING ON EXACTLY WHAT THEY BOUGHT INTO---A PRIVATE, SINGLE-FAMILY HOME NEIGHBORHOOD THEY COULD RAISE THEIR FAMILIES IN WITH ALL THE PERSONAL, SOCIAL, ECONOMICAL, .CULTURAL AND WHATEVER OTHER VALUES THEY WOULD BRING WITH THEM. THAT RUNS PART AND PARCEL WITH SELLING A HOUSE---YOU ARE SELLING A LIFESTYLE—A STORY THEY CAN COUNT ON TO LIVE WITHIN. AND WHAT ABOUT THE DEVALUATION OF THE PROPERTY VALUES THAT WILL NEVER COME BACK AFTER PUTTING IN SUCH A DISCONCERTING, 'FREAKY, DARK; HAUNTING, NOBODY-WANTS-IT- HERE BUSINESS??? HAVE YOU EVEN THOUGHT ABOUT THAT? WE DON'T WANT IT AND HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO LIVE WITHOUT THE ENCUMBRANCE OF A BUSINESS LIKE THIS ACROSS THE STREET FROM ANY OF US! AGAIN—HAVING SOLD REAL ESTATE I UNDERSTAND HOW DEEPLY CONNECTED THE HOME BUYER IS TO THE ENTIRE PROCESS WHICH ENTAILS MANY QUESTIONS AND NECESSARY ANSWERS. AND EVERY ANSWER HAS MEANING TO SOMEONE DECIDING ON WHERE THEY WILL LIVE!!! AND AFTER THEY GET IN, SETTLE INTO THE HOME AND THE AREA—THE LAST THING THEY NEED TO DEAL WITH IS THINKING THEY DON'T WANT TO LIVE THERE, OR THINKING ABOUT HAVING TO MOVE OUT! AFTER MAKING SUCH A HUGE COMMITMENT—A COMMITMENT THEY EXPECT THE • CITY TO RETURN AND ONE THE CITY NEEDS TO RETURN!!! BEING AT HOME SHOULD BRING WITH IT THE FEELING OF "HOME," —SAFETY, SECURITY, COMFORT, AND THE CONNECTION ONLY HOME CAN BRING. IT'S BEEN THAT WAY FOREVER AND IT WILL ALWAYS BE THIS BUSINESS IS INSTIGATORY IN NATURE, IS BAITING TO THE HEARTS OF THOSE IMMEDIATELY LIVING NEXT TO THAT LAND, IS INCOMPREHENSIBLY DISRESPECTFUL, IS SELFISH, UNDERMINING, AND THE CITY IS BULLYING THE RESIDENTS WHO SUPPORT IT. THIS BUSINESS GIVES NO COMFORT—ONLY PSYCHOLOGICAL DETRIMENT AND HAS NO BUSINESS BEING IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD!!!! GET OUT!!!! I WORK HARD ALL DAY AND HAVE TO COME HOME AND TO DEAL WITH THIS. WHO IS IT THAT EVEN LET THIS PLAN GET THROUGH TO THIS STAGE? Did you really think we wouldn't care THAT YOU ARE ATTEMPTING TO CHANGE THE ENTIRE FEEL OF THE AREA MANY HOMEOWNERS SPENT TOO CLOSE TO A MILLION DOLLARS TO BUY INTO? YOU DONT PUT A MORTUARY OF ALL THINGS INTO A NEIGHBORHOOD---YOU ARE NOT THINKING HERE!!!! EVERYONE IN THIS AREA IS AND WOULD BE AFFECTED BY THE IDEA OF PUTTING SUCH AN INAPPROPRIATE BUSINESS IN A FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD!!! I AM ALSO VERY SICKENED BY THE OBSCENE IDEA TO MAKE MONEY OFF DEATH IN THE MIDDLE OF SUCH A FAMILY-SINGLE-FAMILY-HOME NEIGHBORHOOD—FULL OF CHILDREN, SCHOOLS, FAMILIES JUST TRYING TO GET BY, WHO WERE ALL PROMISED IN THE PURCHASE THAT THIS AREA WOULD STAY COMPLETELY FAMILY ORIENTED IN ONLY PUTTING IN MORE HOMES—WHICH WAS WHAT RANCHO CUCAMONGA IS ALL ABOUT. NOW THEY ARE ABOUT MAKING MONEY NO MATTER WHAT. • YOU CANNOT CHANGE AN ENTIRE AREA'S WAY OF LIFE AND MAKE THEM HAVE TO DEAL WITH A & B 40 7/10/2012 Page 3 of 4 SUCH A BUSINESS THAT HAS NO BUSINESS EVEN ASKING TO BE IN A FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD���� m GO AWAY WE DON'T WANT YOU HEREmmmmI NOWHERE IN THIS AREA DO WE NEED TO FEEL THE PRESENCE OF A MORTUARY!!!! • MYSELF AND MY FAMILY DO NOT WANT A FUNERAL HOME OF ANY KIND ANYWHERE NEAR THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS IS A THOROUGHFARE TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS, SCHOOLS, CHURCH, BUSINESSES, THE POST OFFICE, ETC. IT IS COMPLETELY INCOHERENT THINKING TO PUT IN A BUSINESS THAT IS OF PURE DEATH AND THE LOSS OF A LOVED ONE ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS, EVERY SINGLE DAY, HAVING THE POTENTIAL FOR MULTIPLE SERVICES A DAY INTO A FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD IT IS INCONCEIVABLE HOW YOU TRIED TO PUT THIS IN AND DIDNT SAY ABSOLUTELY NO AT THE VERY OUTSET! HOW COULD YOU EVEN THINK TO ALLOW THIS KIND OF BUSINESS IN? ETIWANDA.GARDENS IS BAD ENOUGH, BECAUSE THEY DO THOSE KIND OF SERVICES AND IT LEAVES A BAD FEELING ABOUT THE PROPERTY—ONE YOU DONT WANT TO GO BACK TO—LIKE HAVING TO GO TO A CEMETERY BECAUSE IT IS ALL ABOUT LEAVING SOMEONE YOU LOVE BEHIND AND EVERYTHING DEATH ENCOMPASSES. AND THIS NEW MORTUARY WOULD BE LIKE NO OTHER BUSINESS—NO OTHER BUSINESS!!!! DEATH IS DEATH AND LIFE IS LIFE AND NO ONE ALIVE WANTS TO BE AROUND DEATH AND WE DON'T HAVE TO BE!!!! WHOEVER ON THE CITY COUNCIL WHO THINKS THIS IS O.K., CAN PUT IT ACROSS THE STREET FROM THEIR HOUSE AS LONG AS THEY DON'T LIVE ANYWHERE NEAR US!!!! HOW CAN YOU BE SO INSENSITIVE? OR THINK THIS WOULDN'T MATTER? HOW CAN YOU THINK TO DO THIS TO TAX-PAYING RESIDENTS YOU REPRESENT? HOW CAN YOU THINK TO PUT THIS NEXT TO FAMILIES? • HOW CAN YOU THINK TO PUT THIS NEXT TO CHILDREN? HOW CAN YOU THINK TO PUT THIS NEXT TO SCHOOLS? HOW CAN YOU THINK TO PUT THIS IN FRONT OF PEOPLE ON A DAILY BASIS AND FORCE THEM TO BE PUT IN TOUCH WITH THEIR MORTALITY JUST BY HAVING TO SEE IT EVERY SINGLE DAY FOR THE REST OF THE TIME THEY LIVE HERE? PEOPLE BOUGHT IN THIS AREA WERE PROMISED HOUSES ONLY IN THIS AREAmn YOU CAN'T TO THIS TO US AND YOU OUGHT TO BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVESlullllll tIII THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR ENORMOUS TRAFFIC PROBLEMS DEPENDING ON HOW MANY FAMILY MEMBERS PER SERVICE AND HOW MANY SERVICES PER DAY! AND THAT IS ONLY THE BEGINNING. AND ONCE YOU LET IT IN YOU CAN'T TAKE IT BACK!!! STOP THIS NOW PLEASE TO HAVE TO SEE HEARSES OF ALL THINGS, EVERY SINGLE DAY AT ANY GIVEN POINT IN A DAY IS REALLY BEYOND WORDS AND A DISGUSTING THING TO PUT IN FRONT OF PEOPLE—YOU CANNOT MAKE THE PEOPLE LIVING IN THIS AREA, WHERE PROPERTY VALUES WILL ABSOLUTELY DROP EVEN FURTHER BEING FORCED TO BE ACROSS THE STREET FROM DEATH ON A DAILY BASIS, EVERY DAY WATCHING HEARSES, LIMO'S, ANY OTHER VEHICLES FOR DEAD BODY CARRYING, AND MOURNING PEOPLE FILING IN AND OUT AS THEIR DAILY "NEW" WAY OF LIFE BEING FORCED UPON THEM BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IS JUST TOO SICKENING. JUST THINKING ABOUT THIS IS NAUSEATING AND ANXIETY PRODUCING! Ill WE ARE ALREADY TAX-PAYING RESIDENTS-WHERE, IF WE A & B 41 7/10/2012 Page 4 of 4 WOULD HAVE KNOWN THIS WAS EVEN A CONSIDERATION IN YOUR PLANS WOULD NEVER HAVE MOVED HERE. EVER!!!! THIS WAS FALSE ADVERTISING. A PLACE YOU CALL HOME IS SUPPOSED TO BE FREE OF ANY NEGATIVE, FEELINGS THAT WOULD LEAVE A HOMEOWNER NOT WANTING TO GO HOME-TO BE AFRAID OF GOING HOME BECAUSE OF THE INSENSITIVE BUSINESS OWNERS ACROSS THE STREET...HAVE YOU THOUGHT THAT IT MIGHT BE A VERY BAD DECISION TO PUT IN A BUSINESS LIKE THIS WITH SO MANY PEOPLE ---EVERYONE IN THE COMMUNITY---VOTING AGAINST IT??? THEY JUST MIGHT HAVE SOMETHING TO LOSE... YOU ARE DISGUSTING FOR EVEN ALLOWING THIS PROJECT TO GET THIS FAR! NO FUNERAL HOME IN ETIWANDA, RANCHO CUCAMONGA—STOP THIS NOWII00000IUIImn Chris Downey, Rancho Cucamonga, CA A & B 42 7/10/2012 Page 1 of 4 Smith, Michael • From: ly downey [Idowney909 @hotmail.com] Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 9:02 PM To: Smith, Michael Mr. Michael Smith,AND EVERYONE ELSE WHO NEEDS TO SEE THIS I EXTREMELY OPPOSE THE MORTUARY PROPOSAL AT ETIWANDA AND CANDLEWOOD AVENUES. Please stop this project immediately for the psychological sake of all the residents of Etiwanda,who will be traumatized by this and it will extend deeply into the community FAR beyond just the streets of its existence. AND THE FUNERAL HOME COMPANY KNOWS THIS AND STILL DOESN'T CARE ABOUT THE COMMUNITY OF PEOPLE IT WILL HOLD IN ITS GRIP OF FEAR AND OVERWHELM AND BECAUSE THIS IS A BUSINESS LIKE NO OTHER---THIS CITY NEEDS TO STOP THIS PLAN IMMEDIATELY. THIS IS COMMON SENSE--NO ONE WANTS TO LIVE NEAR A MORTUARY AND IT IS PSYCHOLOGICALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. • . There is nothing like a lifeless body. It can never come back and to those who lost it will define a moment they will never be the same from. • It will define a moment they never want to relive and never want to be part of in all the arrangements that have to be made to take care of someone they love who now no longer breathes. It is completely traumatic and horrible and painful and everything that death brings to the door of the people it will,when it will. Some feel they can barely breathe at the thought of losing someone and some don't ever recover to how they were before. This cannot be underestimated or overlooked. The psychology of death is a study in itself and something you only want to think about when you have to and not a moment sooner. The torment left behind and the twisting pain, are things you can try to run from but it holds you wherever you try to outrun it. And to be faced with death on a daily basis as a community at large is a petrifying thought. Nothing on television can prepare you for what you would see in real life and no one wants to think about the end of their own. I am in Cancer treatment and think about death more often than I would like and understand TOO fully the moments of life needing to be kept as just that—alive and without fear. I live on and off with my daughter constantly as my health needs in the Etiwanda area off the street of Etiwanda. I was with my daughter the other day when we discovered the sign with the word "funeral"in front of the word "home." We had never seen that before, though we travel this road often. It is the way • we get to the Victoria Gardens mall and to the Post Office. It also sits across the street from where my Uncle's services were performed at Etiwanda Gardens, so even coming down that street is painful enough from just that memory alone, let alone the idea of what you have planned. And your sign hasn't been up for 7/2/2012 A & B 43 Page 2 of 4 • 7 months. Many of us have talked about that in the recent days and we remember there used to be a sign with some mention of what seemed to be an "alcohol permit" being sought last year? Now it will be unbearable. • DO NOT ALLOW THIS HUGE MONEY-PROFIT-MAKING-COMPANY-TAKING-CARE-OF- DEAD-PEOPLE BUSINESS TO COME INTO THIS CITY IN THIS AREA—SOMEONE SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES INCLUDING THE PEOPLE TRYING TO COME IN. I 1 RY TO NOT THINK ABOUT DEATH, BUT PUTTING IN SOMETHING LIKE THIS WOULD HAVE ME THINKING ABOUT IT EVERY DAY JUST KNOWING IT WAS THERE IS TOO MUCH. I STARTED SHAKING WHEN I SAW IT. • THIS IS VERY REAL AND YOU HAVE TO TAKE THIS INTO CONSIDERATION FIRST AND FOREMOST WHEN THINKING ABOUT THIS PROJECT---MY DAUGHTER AND SON-IN-LAW WERE PROMISED ONLY THE AREA TO BE SINGLE-FAMILY-RESIDENCES ONLY---I REMEMBER GOING WITH HER TO ALL THE HOMES IN THE AREA BEFORE DECIDING ON THE ONE SHE CHOSE AND IT WAS ALL EVERY REAL-ESTATE AGENT WOULD TALK ABOUT IN IT BEING A GREAT FAMILY ORIENTED COMMUNITY---NEVER EVER WAS THERE ANY TALK RE:ANYTHING OUTSIDE OF SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES,AND NOW YOU HAVE A TASTE OF A BIG-BUSINESS WANTING TO COME IN—A VERY HIGHLY PROFITABI.F BUSINESS WHO IS ALREADY SHOWING THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT THE VERY PEOPLE THEY WOULD BE STEPPING ON. HOW SICKENING. I DON'T WANT TO DIE. NO ONE WANTS TO DIE. • AND UNTIL WE HAVE TO WE DON'T WANT TO THINK ABOUT IT AND BE FACED WITH THE CARS AND TRAFFIC AND HEARSES CARS YOU WILL ONLY SEE HAVING ONLY ONE PURPOSE—WHICH IS TO TRANSPORT DEAD PEOPLE—ON THE STREETS AS CASUAL TRAFFIC. THIS MORTUARY DOES NOT BELONG IN THIS AREA. THIS MORTUARY DOES NOT BELONG IN A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS AFFECTS MORE PEOPLE WHO DON'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT IT AND ANY PERMIT THAT ALLOWS YOU TO ONLY NOTIFY A CERTAIN PERIMETER DOESN'T MA 11 ER BECAUSE EVERYONE PASSING ON ETIWANDA WILL BE AFFECTED. YOU DON'T WANT SCHOOL CHILDREN TO BE FORCED TO SEE THIS KIND OF THING ON A DAILY BASIS AND IT COULD BE A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION WITH INCREASED TRAFFIC. KIDS AND PEOPLE OF ALL AGES DON'T HAVE GOOD FEELINGS ASSOCIATED WITH HEARSES,VANS,FUNERAL PROCESSIONS, ETC. BECAUSE THEY EXIST FOR ONLY ONE REASON—TO 1 RANSPORT A DEAD PERSON—AND THAT BUSINESS DOES NOT BELONG HERE IN THIS AREA AT ALL. BRINGING ONE'S MORTALITY TO THE FOREFRONT OF THEIR EVERY DAY LIFE IS EXCRUCIATING AND THE ABSOLUTE INSENSITIVITY THAT HAS BEEN AT T OWED FOR IT • TO GET THIS FAR IS REPREHENSIBLE. 7/2/2012 A & B 44 Page 3 of 4 MY DAUGH 1'ER WHEN SHE WAS LITTLE UNDERSTOOD WHAT THOSE CARS MEANT BECAUSE OF HER GRANDFATHER'S PASSING AND SHE HAS BEEN AFFEC I ED BY THEM • EVER SINCE. PEOPLE ARE PEOPLE AND LIVE PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE FORCED TO BE AROUND DEAD ONES AND MOURNING FAMILIES AS A WAY OF LIFE. SOMEONE HASN'T THOUGHT THIS THROUGH. THIS WILL BRING DOWN PROPERTY VALUES. THIS WILL UPSET THE COMMUNITY UNNECESSARILY AND DISRESPECT AND INSULT OUR CULTURAL AND OTHER VALUES. I DON'T WANT TO DIE,AND I DON'T WANT TO BE FACED WITH HAVING TO SEE "THAT" PART OF IT-IN FRONT OF ME ON A CONSTANT BASIS. THIS ISN'T RIGHT. THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO HAVE TO DEAL WITH DEATH IN THIS WAY DAILY DO SO BY CHOICE IN THEIR JOB OF WORKING FOR SUCH A COMPANY AND SHOULD KNOW BE 1ER THAN TO FORCE THEIR WAY OF LIFE ON INNOCENT NEIGHBORHOODS OF PEOPLE WHO BOUGHT HERE WITH THE PROMISE OF THERE BEING NOTHING FOR THEM TO WORRY ABOUT. NOW YOU ARE GIVING THEM SOMETHING TO WORRY ABOUT. LEAVE THAT PARCEL OF LAND TO ITS OWN. • THIS IS WRONG FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA. THIS WAS A WRONG IDEA FROM THE BEGINNING. I WANT YOU TO KNOW I HA It THIS AND HAZED HAVING TO WRITE THIS LEI 1'ER BECAUSE OF WHAT IT BROUGHT UP IN ME TO HAVE TO DO IT. I AM IN A CANCER RESEARCH STUDY AT USC AND EVERY TIME I HAVE TO FOR MY CAT SCAN AND BLOOD WORK I AM 1 ERRIFIED OF WHAT THEY WILL FIND. I DON'T WANT TO THINK ABOUT THIS EVERY DAY----HOW INSENSITIVE CAN YOU BE??? TO THE VERY CITIZENS WHO GIVE YOU YOUR JOB BY HAVING BOUGHT INTO THE CITY THAT EMPLOYS YOU ALL? WHAT ARE YOU THINKING? THIS IS A TERRIBLE IDEA. THIS IS WRONG BEYOND WORDS. AND I DON'T CARE ABOUT THOSE WHO DON'T HAVE THE SAME SENSITIVITIES AS I DO—YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO CARE ABOUT YOUR RESIDENTS AND THIS IS A NO-BRAINER REALLY. YOU CAN'T PUT DEATH IN FRONT OF SO MANY---YOU ARE S t EPPING ON MANY PEOPLE'S PERSONAL, CULTURAL,AND RELIGIOUS VALUES THEY WERE RAISED WITH LET ALONE THOSE WHO JUST DON'T WANT TO BE THAT CLOSE TO DEATH! IT IS EASY TO UNDERSTAND. • THERE IS NOTHING LIKE DEATH. IT IS THE VERY END OF YOUR LIFE WITHOUT THE CHANCE TO COME BACK. IT IS FOREVER,AND IT IS A HORRIBLE THOUGHT. 7/2/2012 A & B 45 Page 4 of 4 I AM MORE THAN UPSET BY THIS---WHAT KIND OF BUSINESS OWNERS COULD BE THIS INSENSITIVE TO AN ENTIRE AREA OF PEOPLE BY EVEN PUSHING TO GET A • PROJECT LIKE THIS THROUGH WITHOUT EVEN A THOUGHT TO ALL THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA THEY WOULD BE PUSHING THEMSELVES IN FRONT OF ON AN HOURLY AND DAILY BASIS WITHOUT CARE TO ANYONE HAVING TO WATCH FUNERAL PROCESSIONS AS THE "NEW"VIEW FROM THEIR PROPERTY, OR JUST DRIVING DOWN THE STREET? SCI THAT'S WHO!!! THIS IS SO SICKENING"mmu THERE IS.NO CARING IN PROFITEERING AND I JUST NEVER SAW RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS A PLACE THAT WOULD ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN. THESE PEOPLE MAKE ME SICK!!!! THIS IS SO BEYOND DISRESPECTFUL---EXPECT A FIGHT AGAINST THIS. STOP THIS PROJECT NOWiimmnmmmmli HELP US MICHAEL!!! PLEASE HELP US NOWum L. Downey Rock Garden Court, Etiwanda, CA 91739 • • • 7/2/2012 A & B 46 Page 1 of 3 Smith, Michael • From: VANDM Angelo [viangelo77 @yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 6:50 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: ETIWANDA MORTUARY ABSOLUTE OPPOSITION Mr. Michael Smith Sir, I work at Victoria Gardens and am very upset to know about this proposal to build a funeral home close to where I work. I AM SAYING I OPPOSE THIS ETIWANDA MORTUARY PROJECT COMPLETELY AS DOES MY ENTIRE FAMILY WHO WORKED VERY HARD TO MAKE A LIFE HERE NEVER TO HAVE TO COME ACROSS SOMETHING LIKE THIS. THIS IS AWFUL, PLEASE SIR. I come from a background in Los Angeles where gun-fighting and gang activity is the norm. When my parents divorced, my mom did everything she could to get us into a better area. We moved to Ontario first, and then to "older" Rancho Cucamonga before it was what it is today. • I remember how grateful my sister and I were moving to a place we didn't have to be afraid of in the middle of nowhere, a place we didn't have to hear the sirens coming to, a place where the coroner or mortuaries weren't being called out to come take who were our neighbors and friends, away in their van while we sat behind iron-barred. windows hoping the next bullet wouldn't take anyone inside our own house. There is a very distinct feeling being in that type of existence so close to death. It feel hopeless and scary. I have a very bad attachment to anything death, including police cars, hearses, the coroner, funerals in general, and I can't even watch the CSI type shows. I lived too much of what would be considered a crime scene to want to watch it on t.v. This brings to why I am writing to you. A very nice client of the shop that I work at, came in and told me she had seen a sign on her way to the mall that said they wanted to build a funeral home on the way to the mall. The first feeling I had was that I • jumped back, like a smack to my stomach and memories. It reminded me of being at home off Vermont. I hadn't thought of that in a long 7/2/2012 A & B 47 Page 2 of 3 time. The girl standing next to me heard part of what we were talking about and she jumped back too and her face went bad upset. We don't • want this anywhere here. So many of us use Etiwanda Avenue to go to home and work and the post office as do so many of the clients in our stores here at Victoria Gardens, they come to shop with us using that street. I was surprised I did not see the sign myself to say what it did. I am used to seeing new homes signs that look just like that for so many years. My client who told me had also not ever seen it before and was very upset while she was in the store trying to shop. She said she was going to call and get information and then call me back. She did and gave me your information to tell you how I feel. I hope you care how I feel. I would care how you feel. I grew with the gangs who didn't care about how anyone felt. I don't want to feel that kind of loss of control over where I live again. As someone who works, shops, lives and does business in Rancho Cucamonga, who comes from the background I did, who come so far and works very close to where this new project is asking to be located, I can only PLEAD TO YOU IN MOTION NOT TO PUT IT IN. FOR ME • PERSONALLY it will be like living the nightmares I had to live in Los Angeles, and for the rest of the people I cared about who I had to leave behind, no matter what it looks like, or what it calls itself, it will be there to deal with dead bodies and that being so close makes me feel nervous and scared-and-that won't go away. I don't like that feeling. I don't want to feel that feeling. I don't want this project at all being put in. YOU REALLY DON'T KNOW how many people you will be affecting by putting something like that in who would be forced to pass by it on their way to a day out, but after seeing it might feel different. YOU DON'T WANT RANCHO CUCAMONGA BEING ASSOCIATED WITH DEATH---YOU WANT IT TO BE CONNECTED TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS AND THE NICE HOMES AND THE NICE WAY OF LIFE—THE SAFE PLACE IT HAS BEEN AND WHAT MY FAMILY SEES RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS BEING AND THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT IT WOULD BE IF YOU LET THE MORTUARY IN. I don't want a mortuary a block away from where I work or near where I live it is sickening to me and brings up too much. Even though I tell my • client I will write she does not know my story but now you do. I am 7/2/2012 A & 8 48 Page 3 of 3 begging you on the life I was lucky enough to leave behind not to put me near death. It is scary and brings back very bad memories to me to • know this project would even be considered for such a prominent area— it doesn't belong—it is dead people being mingled in with live people. That isn't right. Please don't. Death is not for the living neighborhoods. Death is a sadness you try to escape and stay away from. HELP US, PLEASE HELP US. Victor and Mary Angelo Please, this has really rattled my mom and other people I work with. Please help while you still can. This is awful, oh god, please help my family. • • 7/2/2012 A & B 49 Page 1 of 1 Smith, Michael From: Christine Curtess [chriscurtess @gmail.com] • Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 9:55 AM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Mortuary in Rancho Cucamonga My name is Christine Curtess and I am a resident and real estate agent in Rancho. Is this a god idea to. have this structure at this location. What happened to the location on Basline in Old Rancho. I am appalled that something like this is taking place in the newer pat of Rancho. This is not a landmark and will stick out like a sore thumb. Sincerely, Christine Curtess DRE#00933256 Evergreen Realty Cell I 909 996 1883 I F 909 463-2550 http://www.chriscurtess.com • • 7/2/2012 A & B 50 Page 1 of I Smith, Michael • From: Gary D. Olson [golson @farmersagent.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 27,2012 1:51 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Mortuary Project on Etiwanda Ave Michael, I live and work in Rancho Cucamonga. My home is located just off Etiwanda Avenue at 12783 Rock Garden Court, and my business is located near Foothill and Rochester at 11830 Sebastian Way,Suite 101. I recently noticed a sign indicating that somebody wishes to locate a mortuary on Etiwanda Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. I would like to voice my strongest opposition to this. The area in question is almost 100%residential with three schools mixed in.A residential area is no place for such an operation.The very thought of placing a mortuary here is ludicrous and idiotic. I do not wish to debate zoning laws and regulations.This is where my family lives! I do not wish them to be forced to see an operation totally and completely associated with DEATH-the most frightening event of our lives. A mortuary would degrade quality of life for those of us forced to see it every day.Additionally,a mortuary would bring our property values down even more. In addition to my written opposition, I would like to state that I'm ready to do everything legally possible to oppose this project, and there are many others in the area who feel the same. My hope is that someone in Rancho Cucamonga's chain of approval (you, perhaps?) will be sensible and put a stop to this NOW,and start working to get the project moved to a more suitable location. • Sincerely, Gary Olson (909) 214-3707 Cell Gary D. Olson Farmers Insurance Group, Agent 11830 Sebastian Way, Suite 101 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 786-2280 Phone (866)950-6325 Fax aolson@farmersagent.com • A & B 51 7/10/2012 Page 1 of I Smith, Michael From: Pam Hemiosilla [redditchick @gmail.comj • Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 9:49 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: That funeral home is a terrible idea. • To Community Development: . Isn't building a funeral home in a residential area just depressing and unattractive? I strongly disagree to • the establishment of this, and I am sure many of the home owners and families in this area do too. Sincerely, A Rancho Resident • • A & B 52 7/10/2012 Page 1 of 1 Smith, Michael • From: yvonne fibres [yvonflo @yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 2:20 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Proposed Funeral Home at Etiwanda & Candlewood, City of Rancho Cucamonga I attended the community meeting held at Etiwanda Gardens Community Center on March 8 and was very disturbed about the plans to build a mortuary so close to the residential dwellings. Why here??? Right now it is a nice and quiet neighborhood then we'll have all sorts of traffic congestion and the idea alone of a mortuary not even two blocks away just does not feel right to me. Please, please the City of Rancho Cucamonga has to deny their petition. We DO NOT want them in our neighborhood!!! Appreciate your advising me of any more meetings and/or gatherings at city hall so we can put in our two cents worth. Thanks. • • • • A & B 53 7/10/2012 • 13 0 so/woe? ( tcce' (4- - r,/V //a 6gnc`/pCucc /c494 Ot 1/799 / Mike Smith & James Troyer City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga RANCHO Ct�CAP ONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 CITY OF • Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 APR 0 4 2012 Michael.Smith(a)cityofrc.us g A p A'/*G Dear Planning Department: RECEIVED - PLANNING Re: Fiie Number DRC2011-01094 & 01094D As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's • enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community nor the lost tax revenue for depreciated home values. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, • U A & B54 1336 Sonoma Cr£ e >! G enneAo Cocas?orig Cli 4 (739 • Mike Smith & James Troyer / /02-- City Planner U City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith(a�cityofrc.us APR 0 4 2012 Dear Planning Department: RECEIVED - PLANNING Re: File Number DRC2011-01094 & 01094D �+ "d As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would. be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, • have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community nor the lost tax revenue for depreciated home values. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, • 4 M10 i An. A & B 55 "6 Smith, Michael From: iconic62488 @mypacks.net • Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 4:43 PM To: Smith, Michael;Troyer, James; Schrader, Lois; Gillison, John; Victorino, Valerie; Michael, Dennis Cc: neighborhoodfuneralhome @yahoo.com Subject: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094 • March 25, 2012 Michael Smith Associate Planner '10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Proposed SCI Funeral Home in Residential Neighborhood (Candlewood/Etiwanda) • Dear Mr. Smith et. al, • I am sending you a formal complaint, not only about the proposed funeral home at a site that is bounded by • residential homes and a school nearby, but also about the City's absence of concern for those living in the area. My fiancé and I purchased a home that is 1100 feet from the planned site just two.years ago. Even though the • City may think that only homeowners within 660 feet are impacted by a funeral home and the traffic it generates, that is far from being the case. Candlewood is the street that I use to come home from work and I would be impacted by any such business that is placed on the property. It is also a route I take on the weekends as well. So, I consider myself to be very much affected by any funeral home that is placed in my neighborhood.The funeral home would also create an unsafe situation for our kids, as children walk along Etiwanda to and from school. Not to mention, there are usually kids in the area right across the street from the site. For these reasons, I attended the meeting on March 8th, 2012 that the City didn't notify me was taking place (although I had contacted you directly to ask about any meetings. You would think as the associate planner you would have taken that opportunity to tell me about the community meeting, but because I live over 660 feet away, I was not informed; despite the fact that I reached out to you and asked for information on any meetings addressing this proposal. For this reason, I am ever grateful to some of my concerned neighbors who put the word out and left flyers in the neighborhood telling us all about the meeting. This oversight by a City representative and SCI, created distrust from the onset; a feeling that was shared by many at the March 8th meeting. Several of the neighbors that are right across from the proposed site, didn't receive notices. How can such a large organization like SCI hire a company to communicate the meeting in this way? Or was it the City's responsibility to do so?You would think that SCI &the City of Rancho Cucamonga have the resources to do better. Certainly, if you use their logic,'they've done this before and should be experts at it. Unless, you really didn't want the neighbors to show up and let you hear our unified voices. It also makes one think about how poorly SCI conducts business if this is its "standard protocol." With respect to trust, I have to relay to you, your fellow planning commission members, and City officials, that SCI is not a company that I would trust in my neighborhood or in any part of Rancho Cucamonga/Etiwanda. I don't care how badly they want a Rancho Cucamonga address as they stated in the meeting. Upon doing some research, I have found their business practices to be highly questionable. SCI has been under investigation for • poor business management, unethical disturbance of human remains, unlawful practices involving embalmment, and negligence. There are cases either pending or settled (with a judgment against SCI) in several states 4/2/2012 A & B 56 rage z ui 1 . . including California, Virginia, Texas (funeralgate), and Massachusetts, to name a few. In the case of a pending class action lawsuit in California, "the Plaintiffs have presented evidence sufficient for the case to proceed to trial, including internal notes from SCI showing that the company was aware that human remains were being thrown in • mass graves in order to make new graves 'fit'."And this is a company that the City would like to have in our community??? I think not! I know that SCI's plans do not currently request any embalmment or preparation of bodies at the proposed site, but a company who bends the rules, violates the law, and basic rights of human decency can't be trusted in any capacity! Whether or not they own and operate the planned site or contract it out, they've shown that they are poor owners and managers of what they call "death care services." I want to make it very clear, that we are not ignorant about the type of people that come to funeral homes. Yes, there are the law-abiding citizens, but there are also gang members and unsavory people as well. My fiancé is a police officer and he has told me how as part of his job, he has gone to funerals to find out the identity of gang members. At times, rivals have shown up to settle a score when they knew that another gang was having a funeral for a member. This is not something we need or want in our community! As it is, the construction going on at Baseline and Shelby has drawn undesirables who have burglarized several homes in the area and broken into vehicles. Because of the economy, home values have dropped. Placing a funeral home in a neighborhood has been known to cause home values to drop 15% or more. We don't want our home values to-decline even further. There are several homes for sale in the area, if you are in high favor of"funeral homes" in such close proximity to residences, come purchase a home here and see how you like having your children walk and.play near a funeral parlor and then to add further insult, watch your home values take a dive. Our community IS NOT in favor of having a funeral parlor near our homes! Put a stop to this. A concerned voter and resident. • • Andrea Salgado • 13000 Block of Colonial Drive Etiwanda, CA 91739 cc: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor John Gillison, City Manager James Troyer, Planning Director Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary Valerie Victorino • • 4/2/2012 A & B 57 Tajinder Kaur • 12770 Golden Leaf Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739 • Pir • • March 21, 20127 , Mike Smith & James Troyer • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga MAR 2 7 2012 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 RECEIVED . PLANNING Michael.Smith(a�cityofrc.us iN Dear Planning Department: Re: File Number DRC2011-01094 & 01094D As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of • his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community nor the lost tax revenue for depreciated home values. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, • A & B 58 Bhupinder Jalota 12830 Golden Leaf Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 21, 2012 , .. MAR 2 6 2012 Mike Smith & James Troyer . City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga RECEDED - PLANNING 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith(a�citvofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File Number DRC2011-01094 & 01094D As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a ontinuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. 4 his funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community nor the lost tax revenue for depreciated home values. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, A & B 59 Harisl'�howdary kcA AO C � o � o n &Y • 12847 Colnnade Dr. b.• Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739 March 22, 2012 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mike Smith & James Troyer City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga MAR 2 6 2012 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 RECEIVED - PLANNING Michael.Smith(a�cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File Number DRC2011-01094 & 01094D As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of • his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community nor the lost tax revenue for depreciated home values. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, A.41A A & B 60 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Fro ; 'rk APR 0 2 2012 733; 'ma ree t • Ranch Cucamonga, CA 91739 RECEWED PLANNNG Mike Smith & James Troyer City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smithcityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File Numb= n ':: As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's • enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community nor the lost tax revenue for depreciated home values. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. ‘ /, Lir/ A & B 61 CITY OF'RANCHO Citaiii@ONGA _ APR 4 2 211 733• oroma Creek Ct R 0 anch Cucamonga, CA 91739 Mike Smith & James Troyer RECEWE PLANNING City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith(c�cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File NumbeK rrV;;: f 1 r ''; ' ® q0: ' D.144-* As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my III neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community nor the lost tax revenue for depreciated home values. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward, C ---,,, . �' 3 /1" / '� A & B 62 • Page 1 of 1 Smith, Michael • From: yvonne flares [yvonflo @yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 2:20 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Proposed Funeral Home at Etiwanda & Candlewood, City of Rancho Cucamonga I attended the community meeting held at Etiwanda Gardens Community Center on March 8 and was very disturbed about the plans to build a mortuary so close to the residential dwellings. Why here??? Right now it is a nice and quiet neighborhood then we'll have all sorts of traffic congestion and the idea alone of a mortuary not even two blocks away just does not feel right to me. Please, please the City of Rancho Cucamonga has to deny their petition. We DO NOT want them in our neighborhood!!! Appreciate your advising me of any more meetings and/or gatherings at city hall so we can put in our two cents worth. Thanks. 7(15- &'nett' • • S 4/2/2012 A & B 63 • 1--- — - - 0sm0 '®t a o'iblas— • 1 ; I ie .) _ Irk.--ty ik i_n_ .a ilo fir. g_myto, cc= N` -rte vl e c ._-36.14-u-i----xu.. I ..he.a,r_d -tyke c;t-g._ __Ku _a_ei ii.. __ _ u- --- _a •Hl a J {A-�-rt e--. e -,� - 1-i s re_a,l(d (� rt�i ntare "or m,,j iiwle -1c m-;d jL N/ kpitte.is v 'fie a're o GL- I 6;. J-1 __0 —r�;- %r P ro `'e . tG� icuft e4-0,,( m 1, e a ° E Et4 i2 40.d 4 i �. . . 'te ?-c %P *Lore v Mt care a I. u> _ . 17 QC h j c{ le tte-r�� Mme `' ``lfp , evVereV • • . 14_ vial k - -N7prova -LGie -RA er al . /tome- pLax . —We_ L G,-(-.4 _e_q_ _ a p ri a Ca e d 6)--Lt - .7laki_ 1 yet( 1 -------G— u a 4) I--&SS de-40-4 , _V W< Q em cr - --- u. — Lt. — / _. I----CITY-OF RANCHO-CUCAMONGA ® _ MAR iq 2012 — — - __--_RECEIVED - PLANNING A & B 64 March 15, 2012 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Mike Smith Associate Planner 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: File No 71If94=&,O y9;° ; SCI Fun- : - vice Inc. Dear Mr. Smith, You are in a position today to have a significant impact on the quality of life for the resident of Rancho Cucamonga that live in the vicinity of the proposed site for a funeral home. This letter is to let you know that I am adamantly oppose to the proposal for SCI to build a funeral home on the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood Street. Having a funeral home so close to me will only remain me of death being a few steps way. That can cause one a lot of psychological discomfort. There is also safety issue to consider with an increase in traffic flow. The site is situated between two elementary schools. What can and will happen when school lets out and there is a flow of traffic leaving the site. With the housing crises that have caused homes to • depreciate by more than fifty percent, the funeral home will only further depreciate the value of the homes in the neighborhood. We have work very home to be able to purchase a home in the great city of Rancho Cucamonga. We enjoy living here and raising our son. That could change if you allow SCI to build their funeral home here. I urge you to strongly oppose the filing. In doing so you will help preserve the peace of mind of all those living in and around the neighborhood. I thank you for consideration in denying SCI proposal. Sincerely, � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAR 19 2012 0 RECEIVED - PLANNING 0 A & B 65 7510 Crawfor. Place CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739 A March 13, 2012 MAR 1 9 2012 Mike Smith & James Troyer RECEIVED - PLANNING City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 • Michael.Smith(7a citvofrc.us .Dear Planning Department: Re: File Numb f_. °'OF1109k ', As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. • Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his • or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: ▪ Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk(whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community nor the lost tax revenue for depreciated home values. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, • A & B 66 Page 1 of 1 •Smith, Michael • From: leeLukelidalin [lukelil @hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 6:56 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Objection on the Project for funeral home home TII�Q((. 0ic'i4 , • 0(0 4V Dear Mike Smith: 11!!�� I live in 12929 Quail Ct,Rancho Cucamonga. I am writing this letter to let you know that i don't agree on the idea for set up a funeral home at the comer of the community It will effect the value of the property which has been decreased so lot already.It will do no good for the kid cause the traffic will be increased. and also,this is the residential area,we don't like the idea for any commercial at all. Thank you for your reconsideration. Please let us know if we have to vote any petition or the schedule for thenew hearing on the issue. regards, n. 12929 Quail Ct, Rch Cucamonga,Ca 91739 • • • • A & B67 3/19/2012 Smith, Michael From 1i ; ` 'be• 4 I j tlm©bestdealalarms.corn] Sent: unsay, Mar =` `;`' `.2 12:18 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: No funeral home at Etiwanda&Candlewood 11220((. Q(O11, • OIOP'41) I don' t want a funeral home built in my neighborhood. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry • • 1 A & B 68 rage 1 U1 1 Smith, Michael • From: FJou923197 @aol.com • Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 3:32 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: NO Funeral Home! Against funeral home in Rancho File Number DRC2011-01094&010 Attachments: I FuneralHomeStopSCLetter.doc Re: File Numb 4t C?A' t .�,09 Dear Mike/Planning Department: As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. • Our area is residential area with excellent school district. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood. . • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Please! Please! Please!!! WE BEG YOU.... Sincerely, 12811 Crestfield Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 • fjou923197 @aol.com • 3/19/2012 A & B 69 • • 7420 Bungalow Way Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 lisa_mcclough @yahoo.com • March 16, 2012 Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith(ahcityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File Num. sR _'°w.r ®® �`® As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be all continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, • A & B 70 • • • A & B 71 Page 1 oft • Smith, Michael From: Jenifer Molineux [Jenifer @jenifermolineux.com] • Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 5:34 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: STOP SCI FUNERAL HOME Importance: High Date 3/16/2012 Mike Smith Associate Planner • City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith(a.cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File Numb :. a , As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of • Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. • A & B72 3/19/2012 rage L V3 Sincerely, `3Ao i5eu 909) 262-231 8 A Local Kesident Remember not only to say the right thing in the right place, but far more difficult still,to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment." —5enjamin Franklin 1 Logo-wshadow2 ell (909) 262-25 18 Office (95 I) 547-8400 • 1 260 Corona Pointe Ct. Suite 102 Corona, Ca 92879 Lmail jenifer@jenifermolineux.com Web www.jeniferMolineux.Com • A & B 73 3/19/2012 Smith, Michael From: hiufai yan [yanhiufai @gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 4:07 PM • To: Smith, Michael Subject: Proposal of Funeral Home next to U.S. Post Office at 7615 Etiwanda Avenue Mike Smith, Associate Planner Planning Department / Community Development, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 March 16, 2012 Proposal of Funeral Home next to U.S. Post Office at 7615 Etiwanda Avenue I am writing to oppose the above proposal. I am the resident and owner of 2 houses, 12815 Golden Leaf Drive and 13118 Gabay Court , both are within walking.fistance to the proposed site. I am very worry about the impact of the funeral home to my properties. Both properties are all my life savings and one of them is a rental property that plays a major part of my income. According to this article, ' 7 neighborhood threats to your home's value' by Brian O'Connell of MainStreet (http://realestate.msn.com/7-neighborhood-threats-to-your-homes- value?gt1=35011&gt1=35012) , ". . .certain commercial facilities nearby, such as a power plant or funeral home, can reduce the value of surrounding homes by as much as 15%" I believe nobody will like to see their property value reduced and income decreased. I urge the City Planning Department to agree with me and my neighbors to oppose the funeral home project at the aforementioned site. • Thank you for your consideration and understanding, 12815 Golden Leaf Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 13118 Gabay Court, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 • 1 A & B 74 • f T H E C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A Memorandum TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council City Manager John R. Gillison Assistant City Manager Linda Daniels FROM: Donna Kendrena, Executive Assistant =' DATE: March 15, 2012 'v SUBJECT: FUNERAL HOME PROPOSAL / ETIWANDA AVENUE I received a call from residen ;tax E; ? G ,;iii x,°,09-565-6431 who wanted to voice her APPROVAL of the proposed uneral Home on Etiwanda Avenue. She attended the meeting on March 8th and was appalled at the behavior of some of the attendees. She would have liked to have been able to hear the complete presentation, but because of the rude and disruptive behavior of several people that just wasn't • possible. She added that the Funeral Home would be a great addition to the City citing that we do not have this convenience and she recently used the services of the same company in Upland and they handled everything perfectly. She repeated several times how disappointed she was with the meeting because of the "evil forces" in the room, and hopes the Council will consider the Funeral Home as a potential business in RC. Cc: James Troyer, City Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAR 1E1t2 RECEIVED - PiA vG • A & B 75 13023 Quail Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 • conniesmiles@yahoo.com March 14, 2012 • Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Dear Planning Department: Re: File Numa B- e474 a^ pt ,_ As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that • landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely,/ /� / 1 t l _ / CA'`Dryw —ndezonme o,` ero • A & B 76 Page 1 of 1 • COUNCIL E-MAIL Distributed a 75---/L • From: Wenjun Hang [gracehwj @hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 10:52 PM l �I To: City Council Subject: Importance: High • I am writing this letter to you in hope that you can support me and my neighbors say NO to the proposed Funeral Home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St.l strongly oppose to this propose.A funeral home is not a good use of this land. I cannot imagine living so close to a funeral home.My family and my neighbors do not need a funeral home to remind us of death on a daily basis.We don't want to live in a depressed area. I understand that it may bring revenue to our city in the short run.However, this proposed development will negatively affect our city in the long run for the below reasons: *Lower Property Values — no one want to buy houses near a funeral home. •Higher Traffic Risk for Children -two schools located on the Etiwanda Ave • *Possible Health/Mental Problems—uncomfortable feeling of having a funeral home neighbor •Worst Feng Shui—funeral home release negative energies (illness/death) to the • neighborhood I love my neighborhood, and I am proud of being a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. I've talked to several neighbors.None of them agree with this propose. We need your help and support.We need you to protect us. Please vote NO to this proposed funeral home development. Thank you! Sincerely, Wenjun (Grace) Hang • A & B77 3/12/2012 7622 Iron Horse Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 wysocki_matt@yahoo.com • March 11, 2012 Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith c cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File N Numb‘ilbtrioNcitii,tpatiu 42,10gRe c 7. As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. • This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, A & B 78 rage 1 OT L Smith, Michael • From: ken hong [kenhongdc @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 5:50 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Re: no to funeral home Ken Hong 7331 Shelby Place #35 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 kenhongdc @yahoo.com March 12, 2012 Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith(a.cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File Numbe `-'ix, me ,6 �-al .0 As you are aware uneral Services nc, is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St: Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be • a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: 1. Increase traffic flow 2. Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services 3. Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual), 4. Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies 5. Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood 6. Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, From: "Smith, Michael" <Michael.Smith @cityofrc.us> • To: ken hong <kenhongdc @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:36 PM Subject: RE: no to funeral home A & B 79 3/19/2012 12833 Crestfield Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 March 11, 2012 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Mike Smith Associate Planner MAR 15 2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 RECEIVED - PLANNING Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Sm ith(Wcitvofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File Numbe �r�rrAti, EG Q �� As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so dose would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of • his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparably further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, . i viµ A & B 80 12833 Crestfield Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 *larch 11, 2012 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mike Smith Associate Planner MAR 1 5 2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 RECEIVED - PLANNING Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith@cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File Numb W. sV a t® • `"� ' , .) i --fit __. As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. is funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of is or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparably further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, • (\r_N-. A & B 81 Israel Garcia 13512 Whitestone Place Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 • March 13, 2013 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mike Smith, Associate Planner MAR 15 2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga p 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 PANNING Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 RECEIVED - Michael.Smith@citvofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File Number i „aF $4lw =8t^131094' '9' As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. • Sincerely, tagWait- • A & B82 Laura Rocha Maez CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 250 "francho Cucamonga, CA 91739 MAR 1 4 2012 March 13, 2012 RECEIVED - PLANNING Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith(a�cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File NumbieD :094, Oa'0.9.4D„ . As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. • Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of lis or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that andowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, 4,/{227/7 °anti os a.Mae: :. A & B 83 Ron Maez P.O. Box 250 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 March 13, 2012 Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 1.0500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.S mith(c�cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: Fil xtmbeiDRG20I2V01-9 &%1;09:4D14 As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, A & B84 12763 Golden Leaf Dr Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .l March 2012 C MAR 1 4 2012 Mike Smith Associate ciate Planner RECEIVELI - PLANNING A City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith(cr�citvofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File Number : g 09 `&DM As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. is funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of s or laridy forme, aril the overwhe1hiirigly majority of-my neighbors: This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely • 3',fa'�"+z.1�i.:74 �"•.-sue A & B 85 Araceli R. Hernandez 7331 Shelby Place, #132 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 • March 13, 2012 MAR 14 2012 Mike Smith RECEIVED - PLANNING Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smithcitvofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File Number D; E0094001094D : As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes tha or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, '• ace I,RikiH&na • A & B 86 Page I of 1 Smith, Michael • From: Tim Truong [tim2signet @yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:14 PM To: Smith, Michael Cc: neighborhoodfuneralhome @yahoo.com Subject: Re: Funural Home in our Neighborhood pgeopi(. Ofoctf, •01 appri Hi Mike, I attend the meeting this evening, my address at 7502 Bungalow Way, my phone number 909-684-7646. This funeral home IS NOT a good fit in our neighborhood. We DON'T want them in our neighborhood. This will create traffic congestion, kid scare to go out and play, my property value will drop big time. So please have this funeral home some where else and GET OUT OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. Best Regards, `S --g• • • • • • • • • • • • A & B 87 3/13/2012 r ag c 1 01 1 Smith, Michael From: Marquez,Alex [amarquez @mwdh2o.com] • Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 6:26 AM To: Smith, Michael Cc: 'Pati Marquez' Subject: CSI Funeral Home 0g2Pn. 01(61.1 • 01001, Michael, Judging from the reaction of the local residents last night in response to the development of the CSI funeral.home on Etiwanda, I wanted to also express our opposition to the development of this business. I don't feel my family and neighbors should be subjected to having this type business in our neighborhood. It will create traffic, bring in undesirables into our neighborhood,and create a somber feeling in the area. It isn't a good "fit"for our neighborhood at all. - Since we moved in to the area,I always envisioned having a park built there. It is a good spot, but of course since it is private land that would be a difficult task. Please let this notice serve as an opposition to this business being brought in to our neighborhood. If you have any questions, please call me at(626)201-4908. Thank you • Rancho Cucamonga,CA • • This communication,together with any attachments or embedded links,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any review,disclosure,copying,dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete the original and all copies of the communication,along with any attachments or embedded links,from your system. • • • • 3/13/2012 A & 8 88 • Page 1 of 1 • Smith, Michael • From: edward kim [edjwkim72 @yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 10:30 AM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Opposition to the funeral home Etiwand and Candlewood ( (.01014 • 01040 Hello Michael, I am a concern resident that will be greatly affected by the proposed Funeral Home project at Etiwand and Candlewood. I am emailing you to voice my disagreement for the funeral home project at the Etiwand and Candlewood location. 1 The area of the proposed project is a established residential community. Funeral home will have great impact in home values (in dollars and desirableness). 2 There are 2 elementary schools within one mile from the projected lot. There is great deal of foot traffic from students in this area. 3 There will be increased/major traffic issues if the funeral home was to be placed in the location. 4 Major emotional and psychological hardships experienced by the residence near the funeral home. Please inform me of any up coming meeting so that I can actively participate in rejecting the proposed funeral home project. Thank you, • • A & 8 89 3/13/2012 Friday, March 9v', 2012 • Re: SCI Funeral Home 12C2O1( •OiG44 , • Qt 01411> To Whom It May Concern, This letter is to express my opposition on the proposed project (SCI Funeral Home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St). I oppose this project for the following reasons: • The psychological discomfort of having a funeral home so close would be a continuous reminder of death which undermines the comfort sought in home ownership. • It would increase traffic flow. • Funeral processions interfering with me exiting my neighborhood. • Funeral services could bring undesirable people into our neighborhood. • Fear of the Funeral Home implementing a Prep room in the future and the City approving it. • • It would lower property values. • If I ever needed to sell my home (due to unforeseen circumstances) it would be more difficult to find a buyer because most people do not want to live near mortuaries. • If this project is approved I will consider selling my home if financially possible. .1 will not live so close to a funeral home. If other neighbors do the same, it will affect the market values of our homes. Thank you for your time. 0( ea-TAAA-4--) 7467 Crawford PI • A & B 9 0 Page 1 of 1 Smith, Michael • From: WEIDE SHI [colinswd18 @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 9:05 AM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Please Stop SCI Funeral Home Dear Planning Department: Re: v rith,a 8Tx cRC2D ON D<1A924:030-090941 As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its • occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Thank you! Sincerely, • A & B 91 3/13/2012 Page 1 of 1 Smith, Michael From: Wenjun Hang [gracehwj @hotmail.com] • Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 10:34 AM To: Smith, Michael Subject: NO to Funeral Home Dear Planning Department: Re: e,,h. . , o: ®R€20 ^O 4& f• Ste; As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Thank you! Sincerely, ven un:Hang v,± • 3/13/2012 A & B 92 Margot A. Mugica 12940 Evermay Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91739 enargo @judicatewest.com March 11, 2012 Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 . Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith(cr�cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: ied‘! mberD' 20i i iinO9Y4etri q94® As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a Continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, fix- a A & B93 rage 1 of 1 Smith, Michael From: dnluedal @aol.com • Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 1:44 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Re; SCI Funeral Home riskti((•Ql04, • °unzip City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept. 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 To the city planning department; We strongly and completely oppose the building of the SCI Funeral Home at the proposed site on Etiwanda Ave. in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. The psychological discomfort of a funeral home in this neighborhood would be a constant reminder of death. The influx of traffic, the lower property values, the likelihood of a gang element being introduced into this area due to this business are all valid reasons to oppose this project. The law recognizes that landowners have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and the right to reasonable comfort, this business would create so many unreasonable issues. The purpose of a funeral home in this area is absolutely unnecessary due to the fact that directly across the street from the proposed site is Etiwanda Gardens -a multiple use facility that would include funerals. Had we have been informed of such a project, we would have never purchased a home in this vicinity. We feel it is unreasonable for the city of Ranch Cucamonga to even consider this project. The city of Rancho • Cucamonga must update its zoning laws(last updated in 1983) and take into consideration there now exist family neighborhoods, a strong community bound together, where there was once nothing but vacant land. -®, 4:c a avast °-922 •uai ourt Etiwanda, CA 91739 (909)646-0112 • A & B 94 3/13/2012 Page 1 of 2 • Smith, Michael • From: Jessika ]jessika_fmaya @yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 5:27 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Re: Form Letter To Stop SCI Funeral Home W2131. 0001 r • CTO5tP 12790 Golden Lef Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91739 Smava@sembrautilities.com 3/11/2012 Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith@cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: File Number DRC2011-01094 & 01094D • As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: Increase traffic flow Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the • hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. A & B 95 3/13/2012 rage z or Sincerely, • • • 3/13/2012 A & B 96 Page 1 of 2 Smith, Michael • From: Jesse Ortiz Desse_ortiz420 @yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 7:45 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Re: proposed development ITC tat •at04�1 .OWN D . Mike, i would like to write on behalf of the proposed development of a single story funeral home that is proposed just behind my property. I recently attended the neighborhood meeting and was not surprised by the outcome of my neighbors. many of my concerns were brought up in this meeting such as the reduced price value of my house.. after doing some math i found that my house value could drop a potential $80,000. I also noticed that this could cause a larger amount of traffic in the neighborhood. my main concern is the safety of my children, i do not feel safe having my children play outside next to such a type of facility. i along with many others believe that this just is not the place to build a funeral home. i will not allow it to be built and am prepared for whatever must be done to stop it. i do apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you but i must look out for the psychological impact this may have on my children and family as a father all i want is the best for my kids. sincerely, From: "Smith, Michael" <Michael.Smith @cityofrc.us> To:jesse_ortiz420 @yahoo.com Cc: "Henderson, Larry" <Larry.Henderson @cityofrc.us>; "Victorino, Valerie" <Valerie.Victorino @ cityofrc.us> • Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 8:49 AM Subject: RE: proposed development Hello, Julio I have received your correspondence regarding the proposed funeral home, Conditional Use Permit DRC2011- 01094 and Development Review DRC2011-01094D. At this time, the project is currently being reviewed by the City and no public hearing has been scheduled. I will incorporate your e-mail as an exhibit in the Staff Report that will be presented to the Planning Commission as part of their review of the proposal. When the project is scheduled for a public hearing, you will receive a notice of the public hearing in the mail if your property is within 660 feet of the project site. Also, there will be a notice posted on the two signs that have been erected on the property and a notice will be printed in the local newspaper. The meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays of the month at 7:00pm at the City Council Chambers. In the meantime, you can always contact me periodically to determine the status of the application. Thanks. Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2750 ext. 4317 michael.smith@cityofrc.us From: Victorino, Valerie On Behalf Of Planning, City • Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:56 AM To: Smith, Michael Cc: Henderson, Larry A & B 97 3/13/2012 rage zoIL • Subject: FW: proposed development Please assist. Valerie Victorino, CAP-OM • Secretary Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)477-2750 ext. 4327 (909)477-2847 fax valerie.victorinof@citvofrc.us Iz From: Jesse Ortiz [mailto:jesse_ortiz420 @yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 5:13 PM To: Planning, City . Subject: proposed development To whom it may concern, my name is Julio Aguero I recently contacted someone in regards to my concerns about the proposed development of a single story funeral home that is to be built just next to my house. My concerns are that this development will cause heavy traffic near my home witch is located in a residential community. i am new to the area and love the price value of the area. A huge concern of mine would be the value of • my house to be lowered because of this facility. also i do not like the fact of raising my two children next to a facility that stores dead bodies i was asked from the person i talked too to write a letter regarding my concerns i would greatly appreciate it if you could please give me a call back thank you, -Julio Aguero (909)685-9053 • • 3/13/2012 A & 6 98 Page 1 of 2 Smith, Michael • From: Adele Luna [adelama64 @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 7:43 AM To: Smith Michae Subj=CC.T un : 0U-04e=4%.flD10� 9 7531 Exbury Place Rancho Cucamonga. CA. 91739 (adelama64@hotmail.com) March 12, 2012 Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Dear Planning Department: • Re: File Number DRC2011-01094 & 01094D As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to ourneighborhood. It would: Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services A & B 99 3/13/2012 1 us., ti Z. Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in • some studies Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, Sent from my iPhone • • A & B100 3/13/2012 • Page l of 1 Smith, Michael • From: denise arkle [denisearkle @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 8:16 AM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Funeral home Attachments: ATT00001.txt D UlO l• 01014 , • 010941) • Mr. Smith, I live on Crawford street near where the funeral home is going up and I would not want that to happen. I do not want my home down down in value anymore then it has and would love to see something more positive go there. Park, restaurant, strip mall, anything else!! I have researched and heard a lot about this funeral home being close to fontana and how this could bring gang activity by my house!!! I live in rancho for a reason and not fontana!!! I have two small boys under two years old and I would not want this around them. My husband is gone for work a lot and I do not feel safe with that information. Please reconsider this and make something useful there!!! NO on the funeral home't111' ,. • • • • • • A & 6101 3/13/2012 7340 Sonoma Creek Court Rancho Cucamonga, Ca91739 Andylayayadi(a�hotmail.com March 13, 2012 • Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith @cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: ! e>1136-20.41M0;1094° CJ41'09' Q As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference:with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, A & B102 7340'Sonoma Creek Court Rancho Cucamonga, Ca91739 Ilene.setiawan @hotmail.com Itarch 13, 2012 Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith a(�cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: 4 ®RC201 ttQ1ar& 610943 » As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. 'Phis funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, ne -etiawan A & B103 Page I of I Smith, Michael From: khushwant singh [ahiksvet @hotmail.com] • Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 10:23 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Funeral home f(•010gt4 , • 010941) MY NAME IS KHUSHWANT S AHI.I LIVE AT 13091 COLONIAL DR. ETIWANDA CA 91739.I STRONGLY OPPOSE FUNERAL HOME IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.PLEASE CONVEY MY FEELINGS TO CITY AUTHORITIES. THANKS qfPratairgtx • • 3/12/2012 A & B 104 March 4, 2012 • Dear Planning & Zoning Commissioner City of Rancho Cucamonga, *Can • 0'094- , • Olacitt� We are Danny and Jennie Dang, homeowners at 12880 Spring Mountain Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. We are the proud grandparents of three grandchildren (4, 3, and 2 years of age) whom we take care of every day at our residence. We are writing this letter to express our concerns regarding the .proposed funeral home business at the corner of Etiwanda and Candlewood streets, located within 150 feet of residential neighborhoods. As property owners in Rancho Cucamonga we strongly object the proposed development of a funeral home in our.neighborhood. We love our community and neighborhood. We feel a funeral home detracts from our great community and the benefits are far outweighed by the traffic issues and depreciation of our property associated with allowing this development. This is a lively and upbeat area that will not receive.any added benefit by allowing a funeral home to be established. This business will bring added traffic, congestion, and general somberness that will detract from our neighborhood. Furthermore, we feel the increased traffic will create an unsafe condition for our three grandchildren. We ask for your consideration of our concerns regarding parking, traffic issues, property. • depreciation and daily melancholy atmosphere this proposed funeral home development would create in our residential communities. • We thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 1i jEara n . N ,1 IA 12880 Spring Mountain Dr, '" 1\ J Rancho Cucamonga, CA 4,11/t n (909) 803-5488 G 1�v�'t W 1� \\ 151 r ' 1V A.; •` F • A & B105 rage iort Smith, Michael From: LINDA CORTEZ [Icortezzl4 @msn.comj • Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 12:10 PM To: Smith, Michael Cc: Icortezz14 @msn.com ,.a,1 Subject: SCI Funeral Services •201(• 010 t , • 0104'1) Hello Mr.Smith, Wanted to email you.on the views that my husband, Gilbert A. Martinez and I, Linda Cortez hold. This Funeral home would bring down the value of our homes further than where it stands now....I can't even refinance as I am underwater with my mortgage and what I owe! I can't afford to lose more value to our home. The traffic at Etiwanda and Candlewood Drive would be such a burden,it takes awhile now to turn south on Etiwanda from Candlewood, and cant imagine what the traffic would be if the Funeral'Home succeeds on building there. I personally don't want to view hearses driving right in front of my neighborhood and taking away my picturesque community. The impact to the kids coming and going to school, yikes! Please keep us informed to any/and all meetings that will take place so we can be sure to be there,and make sure our voice is heard. Thank au, alma y`1 'kV, • 331 Shelby Place #106 Etiwanda, CA 91739 "I have noticed that everyone that is for abortion is already alive."---Ronald Reagan • • 3/12/2012 A & B 106 Page 1 of 1 • Smith, Michael • From: Melody Li [melodyli @hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 4:34 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Re: File Num eD C2011 0;1094)&F01=,FIL Dear Planning Department: As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. • This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: * Increase traffic flow * Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services * Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) * Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies * Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood * Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Thanks and regards, . e'e 'l • 3/12/2012 A & B 107 • Page 1 of 1 Smith, Michael From: Pam Wehmeyer[pamreo @gmail.com] • Sent: Sunday, March 11,2012 5:08 PM To: Smith, Michael Cc: Pam Wehmeyer; sbwehmeyer @yahoo.com Subject: Re: File Num of •RG20101=II?0941:18 094 CI Funeral Services Inc proposed funeral home... Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,CA,91730 Dear Planning Department: Re: File Number DRC2011-01094&01094D As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc.is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death•that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors.This law recognizes that landowners,or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood.It would: Increase traffic flow Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services Raise the question of health risk(whether perceived or factual) Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15%in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community.As our city representative•I beg of you to not let this project move forward, Also, as real estate brokers, we know for a fact that there are certain cultures who represent a large number of the buying pool who will • NOT live anywhere near something that represents death.We have no doubt in this would immediately negatively affect property values in our neighborhood. We have already experienced a huge drop in values due to the economy, and allowing this type of business in this particular location would cause irreparable damage to values in our neighborhood. There are other suitable locations for this type of business. We look forward to your response and the outcry of the community regarding this matter. Sincerely, .,y.,. rawford Place Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91739 pamredi omail.com sbwehmever@vahoo.com Pam Wehmeyer, Broker (909)200-5430 www.PamsProperties.com REO &Distressed Property Certified • Fine Homes &Relocation Specialist DRE 1453068 3/12/2012 A & B 108 12763 Golden Leaf Dr Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 0 March 2012 Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith(a�cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re e umber DRC20i1-0'1094 &i0109 b As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. is funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of is or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, gent en a A & B109 Page 1 of 1 Smith, Michael From: hotmail-liangan [lianganzhang @hotmail.com) • Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 1:30 AM To: Smith, Michael Cc: neighborhoodfuneralhome @yahoo.com Subject: NO Z.p(1•ClOct4 . • 01(54) Hello Mike, We strongly disagree with the project of the FUNERAL HOME which proposed to be built at the across of Etiwanda Ave and the road 15. Please note the place of the FUNERAL HOME should be far away from the residential area. Best Re•ards, 29 or. 'CO`Urt, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 909-463-9693 • S A & B110 3/12/2012 rage 1 of 1 Smith, Michael From: fast-fix @sbcglobal.net • Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 8:19 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Funeral Home • Attachments: Stop SCI Funeral Home Letter.doc MIKHAIL ZEEB • 12752 WINE CELLAR CT. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739 mikhailzeeb @yahoo.com • Date: 3-11-12 Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith @citvofrc.us Dear Planning Department: e z,: ge DRC,20 0- itlgnal2 As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and • Candlewood St. • Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a continuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. • This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of•his or her land) • for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk(whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerel 2 Wine Cellar Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91739 909-561-0363 Tel • 909-803-5116 Fax A & 6112 3/12/2012 Page 1 of l • Smith, Michael • From: hotmail-zds [zhangdisheng @hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 1:28 AM To: Smith, Michael Cc: neighborhoodfuneralhome @yahoo.com Subject: NO NO NO " tecti. attal, • off 0,417 Hello Mike, We strongly disagree with the project of the FUNERAL HOME which proposed to be built at the across of Etiwanda Ave and the road 15. Please note the place of the FUNERAL HOME should be far away from the residential area. Best Regards, a'e Carl ant 12970 Quail Court, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 909-472-9986 A & B111 3/12/2012 Gilbert D. Mugica 12940 Evermay Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91739 DMugica @Yahoo.com March 11, 2012 Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Michael.Smith a(�cityofrc.us Dear Planning Department: Re: ile umber7DRC2011`01094`&"0109.4D As you are aware SCI Funeral Services Inc. is proposing a funeral home at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. Having this funeral home so close would pose a severe psychological discomfort and would be a •ntinuous reminder of death that undermines the comfort and repose sought in home ownership. This funeral home constitutes a private nuisance (interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his or her land) for me, and the overwhelmingly majority of my neighbors. This law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would: • Increase traffic flow • Potentially attract gang retaliation at rival gang member's services • Raise the question of health risk (whether perceived or factual) • Irreparable further the depreciation in property value as much as 15% in some studies • Change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood • Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious impact The taxes from this one business and the two people that would be employed would not offset the hardship endured by the community. As our city representative I beg of you to not let this project move forward. Sincerely, filbert ® " A & B 113 rage 1 of 1 Smith, Michael From: Hotmail (LQH) [ghliang @hotmail.com] • Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 10:31 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: NO NO NO ViCCZO1l•OtO 4, • OtC4¢f? Hello Mike, We strongly disagree with the project of the FUNERAL HOME which proposed to be built at the across of Etiwanda Ave and the road 15. Please note the place of the FUNERAL HOME should be far away from the residential area. Best Regards, E911��,ihoiang I"L98 Golonia Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 909-472-9586 • • A & B114 3/12/2012 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 5, 2012 TO: Michael Smith, MAR 0 6 2012 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Associate Planner SUBJECT: qI a� i r:a__ RECEIVED - PLANNING Our name is Pedro and Diana Romero and we are the residents of 7415 Crawford PI, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Our residence is located within the neighborhood where a Funeral Home (File# DRC 2011-01094) is being proposed. We are very disappointed that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department is considering granting a conditional permit to build a "Funeral Home" in a predominantly residential area. Although the location of the proposed funeral home is mainly located in a zoning code of OP (Office Professional) under the "Etiwanda Specific Plan", the site of the proposed development encompasses a single family residential lot located at the intersection of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. In addition, zoning of OP pertains to the description of office professional; a funeral home is not considered an office professional. Hence, a development of this category is not suitable for this land use unless the "conditional" permit is approved. During a visit to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department website, we found the following description for the Planning Department and as a constituent and taxpayer I agree with it. However, I would like for the Planning Department to execute the below stated functions in this case. "The Planning Department functions as the professional and technical advisor to the Planning and Historic Preservation Commission and the City Council on policy matters and issues concerning the physical development of the community; to encourage proactive long-range planning, to recognize and solve problems before they occur and take advantage of opportunities while they exist; to promote citizen awareness in support of community goals, objectives, policies, and programs; and to actively promote retail • expansion by attracting new stores, restaurants, and services to the community". As your statement indicates, please support the community goals concerning the physical development of our area and encourage proactive, not retroactive long-term planning. Our community is in the need of constructive developments not the destructive ones. After investing very large amounts of money into affording our neighborhood, we would be very disappointed to have a "Funeral Home" that will depreciate the values (Exhibit"A") of our houses even further. Be aware of our situation in regards to property values, traffic, parking, noise, and loitering which this development will produce and don't fall for the short term solution of attracting tax dollars that will destruct the peace and value of our community. A development of this nature will completely disrupt the peacefulness of our community. For instance, since there are various existing major traffic generators (Victoria Gardens shopping mall, four schools, four churches, and Etiwanda Gardens) within a mile radius of the proposed development site, adding this funeral home will generate extreme traffic conditions during a funeral service. In fact, during a funeral procession we would have to hold off exiting our community since our exits will be impacted by traffic. Additionally, the left turn lane on Church Ave/Miller Ave (East) onto the single lane of Etiwanda Ave (North) will be severely impacted because a turning pocket does not exist and Etiwanda Ave bottle necks at this location (Exhibit "B"). In conclusion, we feel that our local government should reconsider expediting such a conditional construction permit, please recognize and solve the problem before it occurs. In an effort to prevent a corporation from destroying not only the values of our homes but the tranquility of our community as well, we expect our local government to represent our community in this issue. •Sincerely, • A & B115 Neighborhood effects on hropem \antis Red! Estate Articiesi Cuidwell Bank Neighborhood effects on property values •09-27-2011 Tags: Real Estate, Home Sales, Selling a home, neighborhoods. real estate agent, Coldwell Banker • Neighborhood effects on property values September 27. 2011 When looking to buy a home, people may not be aware of the effect certain factors can have on home value.As much care as a homeowner can put into ensuring a propeny stays in good shape and maintaining ahouse,the neighborhood is also a factor. • .- _. ' Acpprdmg to ihE,.Apptarsal Institute;a poorly kept yani gr proximify�to commprstalifacilrtessucb asa�funeml home-or power plant can lower raearhy�hbnie"value by as muchias 15 percent Home buyers should he • aware of this when looking for a home or negotiating a purchase, and may wish to consider resale as well, particularly"if they do not intendto stay long. What makes-a neighborhood bad One real estate agent told:MainStreet.com a neighbor.maynegatively affect nearby �l home prices if he allows his home's outer appearance become unpleasant,allows plants to become overgrown or leaves paint peeling or partially-done on the exterior.Neighbors who have constant visitors and parked cars, make noise, have disruptive pets or-otherwise make'living nearby unpleasant can also have a negative effect on home value,even if some of these factors are harder to judge • for prospective home buyers visiting-a property. Investopedia notes vacant homes can also lower nearby values,since they tend to fall:into disrepair without residents caring for them.Even if a vacant home does not cause more serious problems, it remains unpleasant to look at if-not cleaned or maintained. Many of these problems can be spotted simply by driving through or walking around a neighborhood, Bankrate.com suggests.While.it is common for a neighborhood to have some homes which are less attractive than others,or a few residents who are slightly behind on lawn care,the overall pattern can warn potential buyers. Finding a good neighborhood • I Home buyers can look for a number of factors in order to help spot good neighborhoods Which will not drop their property values.Aside from nearby power - plants, landfills and other unattractive facilities,closed schools are a major factor,MainStreet.com reports. . { Bankrate.com suggests home buyers look for neighborhoods with access to employment,one ofthe-majorfactors in home values. University`towns, research facilities, government seats and locations home to creative industries tend to do well long-term.Other factors which tend to correlate with value are proximity to j good schools and nearby parks. Factors like these may be signs of good neighborhoods or reasons the area is desirable, so home buyers who do their research and learn what to look for can find a home that will stay valuable after they buy it and understand what they're paying for. iI ! I i I • EXHIBFT "At4" hup l%www.coldwellbanker.comi real_estate/lean lrr-ig Visrhood_cffects m1_propert _values 03/06/2012 ^ x •"-. 'r�Rr •cG"xfE�W"1 4€.+S � iffi- i�+`�`� iT.\ . ei .. .. ! it ., 'I_•-; t-4;' '+. ,•• ,. ,'• ?1 rtt11 i-•!i m t ' ., Fn' .1R i,i '.,4;:;.;,.7.'_"_-, yS„ 1, :R+f ,,.,..`„t y v, i s 4 y ` 4.7 X0 { 5 aD'Vsl+.7, _ _ ia :_ te'. ..r.'y; 'i'"x - ^5'"4-a,=;r vx:. .3v*tig -, ! ,�'SJ,r,>fy, i "' �1 ' 3t t""' _ `- "" a-'3 •mow t M-4_ 7rr " tt-`-.-:. Sdr m .... - I!'t �, -- a.:-s° r `7'6`i'.'� ''...� �t 3k-I -r it rk -r- ' Pi: ' d' �r � 'Al, m f- ur Run I•4' , 'tip -'4et "'h1.,z ∎ , .- - '.,,,,,,,,,,,..„•.-. .,.•a-14-7= ...,.. 7-'-'---g---.”..,--, —;.,- :..,-,. ,,. -.-: .'! { .: 5 .,� ,"[A � � r °'. .,4, a nod ,-yn"'.r� ar '_•4 *G��(, �j r \l X1 . Ty �j � t . VDC.t T'whit �.. t ......*,,,1,. y. �1,.I ; 4 •v . i mss{f �.i r!� ,qi x #•�' 3-� � sffis y,f'_haw ls}�1 -,, .� 1 t'3' w- �S �"�` �aY�. °,, i` � T i CI aW r -,`+.mue.m t U, • . r" W y _ '''' ' � rHe ...._.,,,,,.Eds3,4yell,N � 4 "�R 1 3 .i tk_> a f k °E-�, Mom o.s-`u.. c :r, i "' Csrr.4 p( + t e: x�.. yy "t„+ D `r'� _rn� '4+ ...-Klp i .?,k a a , +al;w;•,d r# 's'.. I 1 , °•,� ,. i_' - 4 s ly` -- - hi tSw! - __ ��.-r• j "� °r - ter` •�'4,0go�E®br_am L•Y- F •:� K - r lj} }"- �'~ r �_ ; 4j�.�, 7i�- o�ql yam„':: -� : �y`rl r' - ik' € t' +� - " _-: I 4Ri �r } y� '�sa :'4.: t`' > __.k f 1 x i Pi- ,n .. _ a % ! `' .a P a ir « Ib .. 6' 1 -�a t a tr ti..' ! 41 _,F+' #._. I iUF "1+ ' ,, it * 0. 'tfi. }r r .L _ " i q: ",' �H , "74... .' �.. { { N t1814 °r •a.,s ,;- 4;•.. �4i ' ."a .,�s f t irE€"i ,�1•ri'. ;:.I �� °P�'.._ t !ak ai�F" !s°40 1 S in { TF y JW?r..v rA' < , x'-:-tr i 7l 1 Ay } wG r. '-rain ! $ „@, .4Y.5S'I x n ..t_ I ...; 1; ,.--it .� _�: ° G k ���;.v " r ' t '•a' - P ,i9 I-- M;r ,. ....es-,;;;11,.: ',4_ +.,. .., k3 h 1,- o ',,..,,,-,44,..-'ay „4 rN.rs, !i 3 .�3 ors+ "Y�r ;'RY►,�12"' a ! .4.;---2_,' '' :_ '.._,,,_77._ ' tr .ra r F,,, "'• nE :v fll+II•_,.t. r_,. =• : I'' • a.ti., v _y ° .m., .s7 a.- '.• nFg .' aaY y �WrN ;'f :-:_ 1iF .., o-c',ap. 14 1 - W.:—. x W. t '• im !1 _� _.411 .} ' Y t - Ty --:EVwanGeAv - dark -ie r = _ ti k +', .4a.sue . - r - q.,►c yam+r.I' ,w, ^-, �., } *f I A.. I ' _ . ��.'. u, a te • Ic:ult:r;l.-sI a.. „,,• _ � � r .r .� ' -„ • rp3 .Nquk� �Glonerr ,. :ea..-- r` r-, �'t � . h x. r t ,• '• k % u.. �� �� i f; Y M�,i. 3�7 xy +iu �1 . ' " ,ni, � r.1 .,,r2;, K s -i h y. 7- +e 1 . ti�F 18: ' . k �� k -'- :Y % t f 5�” f � �u;" v % ib T tqa - . ,V o e ?r V p � , # c y A$ `� rlatPark3 _ . �.._ P p V ° ' k}ti,,�- - . �°tm $ t :--, 3 _� ._a ''ra 31C�do ,i Y a ,:c'. • ( � '_ y . . -__-. � _ ; ° w y n 1 ma / 7 - f "*y m -a x; , L •�r t - l '1 _ _ _• ,• •.u icO� �F r ! ty 0�� - rim N I 1..r (I � . I! .' -At', �j- t '- 1 - g " ' - Ki4 ".`=' fir.,c _._ �.4 31�„P .....3_4 _ .1.-L,,,,,,-.2 t 4:1„, 1 ' - - Bf !� ' I , t t •.-�.., ' fie_ - - �. r �y � lid 3 . w I -- 3 �. �- - dx er . a r ....;a, 4=. sL 6,`- 'mo7.. ws _ x • - i, 1 -. -', p ': nisD -J..-- w - q . 1 ,ii , , - _ � ° - { A' r - -r . t.r y cr ,�-.s. •■ A & 8117 . . --- ',1'-''i.- - -- -- , :•. . CC - -._-• " .- . ..i , — ,._ t.... -•.: . 1 02 ., . - — • - -,- . ! • . , imr• LUX k 4. -7e-3,;-•--..,,e.,,24,-4-4—..e-,-,-----,--, . i..„-fi,,,,, .,,. - .., .: • 44.wor'' ,r, ' 1. 1■04.v.' IN; .., ' , . ;.,-, • I ; ' . . -..--.., - ..".■ 4' ' . _, ...... . , D • . _•,.....- r•,-; It ' • 4 --..., pr \ . ... _-=--- - V,-- „__ - 1,.,. . _ ----i ---_- 1 .. , , - 4v • 0.) '' ,,-. -, • ' 1,-,.. • • . . . . ._.... . ._ ,....,.., . . - ._ ir = ..., ._ ..• • . 41'Y,t-j,it'l ,''-'''''' . . c.t) .,,,..--,...,.... ..:-...:-.,.',4 • , . . • . ' , ir -• ' 7 .. . - . . . .. • • , . - ... q •■11 1. .... ' . . J .',;,, • • ._ , 0..) _ •• ,,;• lirc, 0 __ _ _ _ - - ,_ • . -_ • , • -- ,..._ CD - 1 i _ • - • . , - . . -•,- • ,..' - i --- -,--. . , -4*51-rlmti,4t„,,H.=-.1,-...-•‘,....--i-,......t,-12,t,;......,.--,...:1....3e: ... ,'-4't•;••••• 04' ,.,-I' 1 ' '- t . . , .1, - I . ■ ,- -„. It ------'--- — - _ I.' - . _ 1 i .,,,:r.-- -- • -_, . •., -- ---- 1 . -----_----„,-....- •• .4. ti v• , # , 0 • A & B118 CO -,.-%;,..F.L- Ltt 1 - ,,,, ''t i= .. " .' ■ -• -... 1. , 4•Lailt, • 4:147-9-.,- •!,,,r ,-, -.....s., :,,„0" r•-k.-=-,r...4r--44,.. --,.... ..,--- v.• irt 1:..-- 1-W. iy 4 ' • 7.. ,t..' ' '"-',,e.'4,,9'00' -' ,:= , Y ,4‘r. vyt.,3, ''1' ,:1` ,.'... ,,,' ,,'11:■.;''''''''"I'''.,'24.q;Z.P2`‘,. 404';*;f '(r4•7'?'"''y g 4:`..1... ,I, ■-.;:".,t_ ' MS; w -“._. 1 ■ t ., .- .., .,.` -.. - - _ ---- A__-_---------_::---1', _ . r.. .7c._• ---- . , -, -=_- - = -- - \ —•-=-- , •• 1'-'"'-'' -.' ^ • ,,;,,,..,, Lred.. a) , - : ---'2:-t-----------------11----- -.-'-..'--:.-r----=---=-..'-=:-- - _ ., 1.-._.„•,.,.4t.....7, ,,,-,-..,-.,,, , ,-- t-,-''.: ,., , cf) a) gl' , ,.._.-- co ,_ -,' 0 = 0 •::: = LLJ .,, '... 7 , , = C fi. C a) .,- --; — ' -, I ■ , 6 ''. ■ 1 ...v4 - v , Er) i • .4-?,. -.-L44, _, 4:,i7,i";.',,,, .""‘ - ,-■ •—, ..- s:L 7, •,,,.!2V." : -- - a) 1 t l', ,, '' u) ,,. . - [„,,',', , .. cL an 2 0 a. 4. _ , - - -i, ■ - tr' A & B 1 1 9 \ '''3 ._._. -_..-_.. .. r e , '-' r '-- ay,h f Al 4 SS{� l _�: r • Sc--.r+wf '.�� .M :`� a F't' S x 0 LL 0� ;' I- ... _- r m • • • 4 a, Aft r t may. a t <:• Y 3 x z. h �E r C p y .t'a'�II 11 f rS FL'.+ - t it 4FXR(1� ,Nft`�^•,'Y � '� .,r-.L.::.,,,, • '; ill "�.7 a dx v� r.-.Y.1 x3 Y i. .....f..;:„ ...,.. •: .4..._.:..: ..• � .•���,k�,��' e:Y p1 � - ��� fif�'�y lktl ,. � -aa E � w { -_ -',... . ' ,.'',..;'•" . ;,r:: ---„r" V i .-7'''''',,;-;::: 0 t , .. Y r A A r 1`L4 • '. 1. :4 :"' �' l - 1 ' ' §r r �-. ;...]p 4 ice' - - .fi . i f i u c c.. , a■ F: 1 c _ r� •-1 •t- -..-- y a'..,i,..4'.,;;,,-,,,..,.. ,I 0 4. � "� {t: 'A .dl $• ,A •:Y.,.....k. • b - `n ,a tli 0.. ��,. . _; , A & B120 • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division FEB 1 3 2012 10500 Civic Center Drive RECEIVED - PLANNING Subject: Fit-W,, ;~:, D1114..6-:4 RI e 094K, NO funeral home near our homes. Keep the city clean! Dear Sirs, We are living in Rancho Cucamonga Homes community (many hundreds of residence) next to Etiwanda Ave and Candelwood Ave. We selected moving in this city because Rancho Cucamonga has long tradition of forming partnerships to achieve goals for Bringing Health Home. But,just some weeks ago, one vacant land filing for FUNERAL HOME next to Etiwanda Ave and the 15Th Freeway. What is the funeral home? Why the city will allow a FUNERAL HOME open in the central area of so many hundred residences • surround. 1) The Victoria Garden (the open air mall) is quite close to the funeral home, no one will like to shop there. 2) National Fish Co, (Restaurant) is just crossing the street, what an eating atmosphere? 3) FUNERAL HOME is just next to 15th Freeway, also next the post office and high traffic Etiwanda Ave., and it definitely will increase the traffic burden badly. 4) The City Council's long term commitment to a "Healthy RC" will never come true, if a FUNERAL HOME burring bodies, all the residences, shoppers, travelers, visitors .etc will smell the unhealthy harmful air eventually. 5) The home value will be significantly dropped in RC city, particularly in the adjacent area of the funeral home. • Sincerely yours, (2121 Biegfritt q- 4 . s ErAtt.„ r.,,,,Tr-,y-7t A & B121 7567 Etnvanda Avenue, CA 91739 - Cloogle Maps Page 1 of 17 To see all the details that are visible on the screen, use the"Print"link next to the map. Goggle ,.-,...„ _.-.,.... b. c . . . I ). T''''• • '19' i • t.) et. .. ,111,,:cerd;:ii;Le-a7.6,-i., ,,,,.... ...1-41,_It Fr , 2_-47;.-4._ -LA--, . ,R,!".,, I ni c 40,00,- ,21; . i.--a--- GOICIetite4fOr4•47.?1,4.1.1.. . i .77 1,-;---jar a.1 'b •-■, "' .- • `-', ' •'''' . .• •' I. •t••••.. CO •L II:. 4,'LT ',it •-. • ,.... . Lk- 1.'4. .. t.-.. • ' Cl . Jl : r., • ' ' 2 E •cr . • • S• -.' t• tli ti i ' r• • A--.4 jp9,t; Littc-....:DL-112- -e- LILL . .m ,P.9 . Cristfleki eta= .„aj. .;!„.is." ?,7„,..,. noNme7Sellal.C.,75 , „, t..,,,Th. 7...4 1.-- f•-.)1 i- -t-,t --1 ".! -1 SC 7 .''''' r . •. . ' .... -,.. •i •:.: V, cti Y,.-1.11-," — : , ,., ,...a -I., t-,,,,,..-b.Gat shop _ isa p.,. .. ..'..„.. -7... . `I',"D''IV•••4 Tr-'• ,ILITI'Vq....4 , ; 7 ,-. -7./'71;.• - .. ':::••/-1.'...— 1. •.' i • '5-r••••••': -c' - e 5. .-ka-,-: --- 77 4 7 . '3.. ut 17 •i''' - .i.. ‘. 7 i:Pt.-;71 7.7 -•''''. b • 'b , ; 1 037,,,,i-.--k---r.----0.-- • :••,,F...-....-,,....;.0,a,- , 1,1,:ii . •. . 13:1„,,,i,d., I, ,, ,-Ini. EverrnavC74, lc; , , .. 4,4 ' ..,.4• •-•• •":•.4' '1 c - 1.1__... . • i G.71.7-144. - ri . . Em.r.iid.,firdt“..• ;g ci , ' h.: •;-•■ I. .44 74g; 24• . . Prolr4.44 Cur11744,77p,C. •- - -7.it. .4' i; •- • . 716`11)11,:r ...-..---.....-Cm-Rte./vend sib b4- _ . Itc... 4•‘:•:•14 ' - ''- • . : . II ; Ir • '47 — 1 •f''': •4- 71. ' ,... , •- •wt it f 344 -137 0-- -7:. - i'•• it i• 4.-'..K f 71. 4 A. .,,i,S -- cro ,-, ;I .7.7::=7...Spling.;40,,inairc.4.3.7 ,,ra$p;ing4Mountair741,4s,....,..,-, i 4 :::- 4..... 4•7' • i - IL : ,i ag't: • .s‘..1 :-. -s—r sit .- L., . - , ,: '1/21. :,-. i ii.," . _ i = . . I ga,- . - ..11144(S11;er.itose eici.ruzic.H.;,:.-4.' 4--t—•-'," 1c . . 0 00,.. ••••••"1,41( ''T 't:1 •"4';••• •I/4- TT. 4...• 1 •-•'"Jere A' ,. : ;: ,T, .... . -- ...,,.. ,.....? o . ..i„ ,,..., . t,,,,ila , !1,4- i - ,-.... 4-...trk . .. -.4,.'...b / . • , 1 ^,.n k:(2•44..'P...7:1717----- ti.'..71P.':. 1 .lyi ' 4,'4 •..."'"4.4•44.7-2374. 7.417:~4.•■,..braset--4....eia,"7,,f''; ' ; 9:,26%7 .. :27'14r4h4 0,e - -.7 n0 if: ,-- . 1, , ,,, -1 •• ,c,: ' C1-turch,Sii13r-c-■ la • r-Lir,v'it. r!':“ • '• :-.rr. - _ --"'Lltautz,":,•• rt•t; ;.•''..rel tit ''2. r • .: - . ‘ i• ' .' ' r i; 'I:". ' ?' .— 7 - , ''45,q;r:‘, -1.., ih -F. ,,L i..0 rrx .2, ti rc.:‘ ! • ro,',. t',./: 4 .4,- , . -_ ' • - , / .. % itT • .-1,!"-irar',...„-„,- rS1-42:64,,t:=pc.;.,;4-rttriii.rettnawr,.,__,L.,...=;,,,,,a._,_ _.,”...7,tar.rr-rat. ,'"•* :7 -li '• I-. ' •a"13".-..--..L-r14.•-,,-,i4.41-'',„rt1:':;1„.:::.,,,v,- .-- ,"-hethn :.c1,, — — .. • • f • III • A & B122 http://maps.google.corn/ 1/10/2012 Page 1 of 2 Smith, Michael • From: Smith, Michael Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 8:49 AM To: 'jesse_ortiz420 @yahoo.com' Cc: Henderson, Larry; Victorino, Valerie Subject: RE: proposed development Hello, Julio I have received your correspondence regarding the proposed funeral home, Conditional Use Permit DRC2011- 01094 and Development Review DRC2011-01094D. At this time, the project is currently being reviewed by the City and no public hearing has been scheduled. I will incorporate your e-mail as an exhibit in the Staff Report that will be presented to the Planning Commission as part of their review of the proposal. When the project is scheduled for a public hearing, you will receive a notice of the public hearing in the mail if your property is within 660 feet of the project site. Also, there will be a notice posted on the two signs that have been erected on the property and a notice will be printed in the local newspaper. The meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays of the month at 7:00pm at the City Council Chambers. In the meantime, you can always contact me periodically to determine the status of the application. Thanks. Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2750 ext. 4317 michael.smith @cityofrc.us From: Victorino, Valerie On Behalf Of Planning, City Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:56 AM To: Smith, Michael Cc: Henderson, Larry Subject: FW: proposed development Please assist. Valerie Victorino, CAP-OM Secretary Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)477-2750 ext. 4327 (909)477-2847 fax va leri e,victorino@cityofrc.us From: Jesse Ortiz [mailto:jesse_ortiz420©yahoo.com] 2/8/2012 A & B 123 Page 2 of 2 Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 5:13 PM To: Planning, City Subject: proposed development • To whom it may concern, my name is Julio Aguero I recently contacted someone in regards to my concerns about the proposed development of a single story funeral home that is to be built just next to my house. My concerns are that this development will cause heavy traffic near my home witch is located in a residential community. i am new to the area and love the price value of the area. A huge concern of mine would be the value of my house to be lowered because of this facility: also i do not like the fact of raising my two children next to a facility that stores dead bodies i was asked from the person i talked too to write a letter regarding my concerns i would greatly appreciate it if you could please give me a call back thank you, -Julio Aguero (909)685-9053 • • 2/8/2012 A & B 124 Smith, Michael From: Smith, Michael ant: Monday, January 09, 2012 7:58 AM 'iconic62488@ m ypacks.n et' 11T-object: RE: Proposed funeral home Hello, Andrea As the application is still in the initial stages of the review process, it has not been scheduled for a public hearing at this time. Therefore, there is no deadline at the moment. However, please submit any correspondence to me at the address below as soon as possible. Also, please include the file number for the project: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094 and Development Review DRC2011-01094D. In the meantime, you can always contact me periodically to determine the status of the application. Thanks. Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga '10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2750 ext. 4317 michael.smith @cityofrc.us Original Message From: iconic62488 @mypacks.net [mailto:iconic62488 @mypacks.net] Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 1:30 PM 0: Smith, Michael bject: RE: Proposed funeral home Can you tell me the closing period/deadline to get a letter to the Council regarding this project? Thank you, Andrea Salgado • • 1 A & B125 Smith, Michael From: Smith, Michael Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 9:09 AM • To: 'iconic62488 @mypacks.net' Cc: Victorino, Valerie Subject: RE: Proposed funeral home Hello, Mr. /Ms. Salgado The project, Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094 and Development Review DRC2011-01094D, a request to construct and operate a funeral home with a floor area of 8,282 square feet on 2 .32 acres of land within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Professional (OP) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located near the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street, is currently being reviewed by the City and at this time no public hearing has been scheduled. When the project is scheduled for a public hearing, you will receive a notice of the public hearing in the mail if your property is within 660 feet of the project site. Also, there will be a notice posted on the two signs that have been erected on the property and a notice will be printed in the local newspaper. The meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays of the month at 7: 00pm at the City Council Chambers. If you like, at this time you can provide a letter discussing your concerns about the project. This letter will be included as an exhibit in the Staff Report that will be prepared for the Planning Commission. Please send the letter to the address provided below and include the project file numbers - DRC2011-01094 and DRC2011-01094D. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks. Mike Smith Associate Planner • City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2750 ext. 4317 michael.smith @cityofrc.us Original Message From: Victorino, Valerie On Behalf Of Planning, City Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:18 AM To: Smith, Michael Subject: FW: Proposed funeral home Valerie Victorino, CAP-OM Secretary Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2750 ext. 4327 (909) 477-2847- fax valerie.victorino @ cityofrc.us Original Message From: iconic62488 @mypacks.net [mailto:iconic62488 @mypacks.net] • Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 11:42 AM To: Planning, City Subject: Proposed funeral home 1 A & B126 Dear 'City Planning Manager, Will there be an application review or hearing for the proposed site of a mortuary/funeral home on Candlewood Street in Etiwanda. As a concerned citizen, I do not like the idea of a funeral home being built right across the street from residential properties. I live in •e tract nearby and have many concerns regarding this idea. Will there be a hearing that (residents of the impacted area) can attend and voice our concerns? Sincerely, A. Salgado • 2 A & B127 Page 1 of 2 Smith, Michael From: Smith, Michael • Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:28 PM To: 'S,E LOPEZ' Subject: RE: Proposed Project , case#2011-0194 Attachments: 211108-Al.0.PDF Hello, Sal See attached. If you have any questions, let me know. Thanks. Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2750 ext. 4317 michael.smith @cityofrc.us From: S,E LOPEZ [mailto:secoversl @ netzero.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 7:16 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: RE: Proposed Project , case # 2011-0194 • Thank you for the documents. Also let me know if you are not able reproduce the map for email or if you need me to pick it up. Original Message From: "Smith, Michael" <Michael.Smith @cityofrc.us> To: "S,E LOPEZ" <secoversl @netzero.net> Subject: RE: Proposed Project , case#2011-0194 Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:10:37 -0800 Hello, Sal Per your request, see attached. If you have any questions, let me know. Thanks. Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • (909)477-2750 ext. 4317 2/8/2012 A & B 128 Page 2 of 2 michael.smith @cityofrc.us • From: S,E LOPEZ [mailto:secoversl @netzero.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 5:39 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Re: Proposed Project , case # 2011-0194 Hi Michael, Here is my email. I look forward receiving the public record regarding the proposed project for a Funeral Home. Regards. • • 2/8/2012 A & 0129 Smith, Michael From: Smith, Michael Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 9:09 AM • To: 'iconic62488 @mypacks.net' Cc: Victorino, Valerie Subject: RE: Proposed funeral home Hello, Mr./Ms. Salgado The project, Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094 and Development Review DRC2011-01094D, a request to construct and operate a funeral home with a floor area of 8,282 square feet on 2.32 acres of land within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Professional (OP) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located near the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street, is currently being reviewed by the City and at this time no public hearing has been scheduled. When the project is scheduled for a public hearing, you will receive a notice of the public hearing in the mail if your property is within 660 feet of the..project site. Also, there will be a notice posted on the two signs that have been erected on the property and a notice will be printed in the local newspaper. The meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays of the month at 7:00pm at the City Council Chambers. If you like, at this time you can provide a letter discussing your concerns about the project. This letter will be included as an exhibit in the Staff Report that will be prepared for the Planning Commission. Please send the letter to the address provided below and include the project file numbers - DRC2011-01094 and DRC2011-01094D. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks. Mike Smith Associate Planner • City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2750 ext. 4317 michael.smith @cityofrc.us Original Message From: Victorino, Valerie On Behalf Of Planning, City Sent: Tuesday, January 03 , 2012 7:18 AM To: Smith, Michael Subject: FW: Proposed funeral home Valerie Victorino, CAP-OM Secretary Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2750 ext. 4327 (909) 477-2847 fax valerie.victorino @cityofrc.us Original Message From: iconic62488 @mypacks.net [mailto:iconic62488 @mypacks.net] • Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 11:42 AM To: Planning, City Subject: Proposed funeral home 1 A & B130 Dear City Planning Manager, Will there be an application review or hearing for the proposed site of a mortuary/funeral home on Candlewood Street in Etiwanda. As a concerned citizen, I do not like the idea of a funeral home being built right across the street from residential properties. I live in •e tract nearby and have many concerns regarding this idea. Will there be a hearing that (residents of the impacted area) can attend and voice our concerns? Sincerely, A. Salgado • • • • • • • 2 A & B131 Page 1 of 1 Smith, Michael From: Smith, Michael • Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 11:37 AM To: johnthai @live.com' Subject: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094 and Development Review DRC2011-01094D /// Funeral Home at Etiwanda and Candlewood Hello, John My contact info: Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2750 ext. 4317 michael.smith@cityofrc.us From: Kendrena, Donna Sent: Tuesday, December 06,2011-10:40 AM To: 'johnphai @live.com' Subject: Applicant for Funeral Home Hi John, I • just st spoke to Mike Smith in our Planning Department and he assured me that the Funeral Home application was just received on November 1st and is at the very beginning of the approval process. He encouraged me to have you send a letter/e-mail with your concerns so that the Planning Commission is aware of how the Community •feels about the project. Another piece of good news. . . the application does not ask for any cremation services on the property,just a funeral home. Mike has requested additional information from the applicant to clarify all property uses and will be happy to speak to you at anytime about the project. He can be reached at 909-477-2700 x 4317. I hope that eases your mind for now, but please send the e-mail or letter as we discussed as it will be extremely helpful during the-approval process. Sincerely, Donna 7(,enufrena,CAP-O914 • Executive Assistant to the City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 919-2615 (909)477-2846 FAX donna.kendrena • at ofrc.us Ix • 2/8/2012 A & 8132 William And Stefanie Isaacs • 12941 Evermay Court, Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91739 (714) 293-6113 January 1st, 2011 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mr. Mike Smith Planning Dept JAN 1 0 2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga /� 10500 Civic Center Dr. RECEIVED - PLANNING Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Smith, RE: REFERENCE ,,t44,, $ .pi& =7o 3 COMPLAI XNST THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE STORY FUNERAL HOME BY SCI FUNERAL SERVICS, INC. On behalf of our entire neighborhood and the neighbors residing in our quiet enclave (on Evermay and Exbury) opposite the site mentioned above, we wish to vehemently object to the proposed citing of a funeral home in our neighborhood and to urge you not to approve the request for the following reasons: • 1. A funeral home poses serious safety and environmental concerns in a neighborhood with many young elementary and secondary school students like ours. The chemicals involved in processing dead bodies are not healthy and children who play around the proposed site may be exposed to those chemicals. 2. A funeral home in our neighborhood will attract an unusual amount of traffic in our quiet, family-oriented neighborhood, which would lead to automobile accidents involving our children who play outside our homes. 3. Locating a funeral home in our neighborhood will expose our children to different types of people, including child molesters and gang members who may need the services of the funeral homes. The sight of gang bangers recruiting new members near a funeral home, as well as carrying out illegal activities near a funeral home is not uncommon in California. 4. Locating a funeral home in our neighborhood will have serious negative impact on the values of our homes. Our homes will be grossly devalued by the presence of a funeral home next door. 5. Without any knowledge of other structures that might be built next to the funeral home, we are led to believe that the funeral home may be one of the numerous high traffic businesses (including a half way home) that might be cited at the site. We want to see the comprehensive master plan for the entire plot of land. • A & B133 As parents of four little children, we are very concerned about the health of our children growing up and being exposed to the dangerous chemicals used in processing dead bodies • in a funeral home,particularly at the formative stages of their lives. We are also aware that a former employee of the city of Rancho Cucamonga has been retained to lobby for the authorization of the funeral home with a total disregard to the wishes and feelings of the neighborhood. This action is likely to expose the city of Rancho to a liability lawsuit We are pleading with you to use your good office to save our children and neighborhood with the attendant menace of building a funeral home in a neighborhood we cherished and care so much for. Thank you in advance for a favorable consideration of our request. Please, feel free to contact us for any discussion on this issue. We can be reached at (714) 293-6113. e„ tfull - i 44 14- (&-1) _ Sa, PCA ^`x ` 1A i iam at d�' tefanie Isaacs . 't iii+"I Concerned Home Owners it-y'' ci�Jt n t _ teSS ACv-p,11 to rrt—T'<--rtczog A • ' Concerned Home Owner (Name) (Signature) (phone#) II l ithl it ,,i —' - v-):c---ThCoz,C'-C _ .- •. ?h4 - 2W-2,--62 (13 1' Concerned Home Owner (Name) (Signature) (phone#) Concerned Home Owner (Name) (Signature) (phone#) Concerned Home Owner (Name) (Signature) (phone#) Concerned Home Owner (Name) (Signature) (phone#) Concerned Home Owner (Name) (Signature) (phone#) • A & 6134 Christopher & Chimezie Ikeanyi • 12970 Evermay Court, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 917-6705 December 14, 2011 cm OF RANNO CUC.A.sIONGA Mr. Mike Smith JAN 4 2011 Planning Dept. City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. � � ? - .M /NIG • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Smith, RE: REFERENCE b ••a °• �, '%6c COMPLAI "'*44.4"; ST THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE STORY FUNERAL HOME BY SCI FUNERAL SERVICS, INC. On behalf of our entire neighborhood and the neighbors residing in our quiet enclave (on Evermay and Exbury) opposite the site mentioned above, we wish to vehemently object to the proposed citing of a funeral home in our neighborhood and to urge you not to approve the request for the following reasons: • 1. A funeral home poses serious safety and environmental concerns in a neighborhood with many young elementary and secondary school students like ours. The chemicals involved in processing dead bodies are not healthy and children who play around the proposed site may be exposed to those chemicals. 2. A funeral home in our neighborhood will attract an unusual amount of traffic in our quiet, family-oriented neighborhood, which would lead to automobile accidents involving our children who play outside our homes. 3. Locating a funeral home in our neighborhood will expose our children to different types of people, including child molesters and gang members who may need the services of the funeral homes. The sight of gang bangers recruiting new members near a funeral home, as well as carrying out illegal activities near a funeral home is not uncommon in California. 4. Locating a funeral home in our neighborhood will have serious negative impact on the values of our homes. Our homes will be grossly devalued by the presence of a funeral home next door. 5. Without any knowledge of other structures that might be built next to the funeral • home, we are led to believe that the funeral home may be one of the numerous high traffic businesses (including a half way home) that might be cited at the site. We want to see the comprehensive master plan for the entire plot of land. • • A & B 135 As parents of four little children, we are very concerned about the health of our children growing up and being exposed to the dangerous chemicals used in processing dead bodies • in a funeral home, particularly at the formative stages of their lives. We are also aware that a former employee of the city of Rancho Cucamonga has been retained to lobby for the authorization of the funeral home with a total disregard to the wishes and feelings of the neighborhood. This action is likely to expose the city of Rancho to a liability lawsuit. We are pleading with you to use your good office to save our children and neighborhood . with the attendant menace of building a funeral home in a neighborhood we cherished and care so much for. Thank you in advance for a favorable consideration of our request. Please, feel free to contact us for any discussion on this issue. We can be reached at (909) 917-6705. Respectfully, Christopher and Chimezie lkeanyi _ Concerned Home Owners • OL L I S P rLaR "'ta° Clog) os-:,5r 4 •f r (Signature) pe, ��i SHRIEy �ter�E2 l M/Mt> (909) 803.-216V Concerned Home Owner (Name) (Signature) (phone#) 1 N 3 "; _' rlsr � Aftt' (q��' go��1 s , ' Concerned Horn Owner (Name) signature) (phone#) • Concerned Home Owner (Name) (Signature) (phone#) Concerned Home Owner (Name) (Signature) (phone#) Concerned Home Owner (Name) (Signature) (phone#) • * 9911 alai Puy A & B13Q , CA '3%731 RICKY THAI 12920 Evermay Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91739 TEL: (626) 233-2000 • EMAIL:RICKYTHAI @YAHOO.COM City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMfpbb`G�, 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)477-2750 DEC 1 4 2011 RECEIVED December 8, 2011 - PLANNING Re: Objection o Cl, . nejal,Services Inc's Proposed Development of Funeral•Home • eNo ,DRC20T1rO1094 S To Whom It May Concern: Following SCI Funeral Services Inc's("SCI") placement of a public billboard notice of their planning application (DRC2011-01094), I wholeheartedly object to SCI's referenced planning application for a proposed nine thousand square feet (9000 sqft) single story funeral home and the following to be taken into account during your consideration of their proposal. • Obscurity of the Project SCI's proposal fails to properly provide detailed instructions on their use of the property as well as, but not limited to,the functionality and purpose of having a 9,000 sqft facility. Their company provides a large range of services including but not limited to providing family members of the deceased a proper site to conduct memorial services, cremation services, specialized cultural and/or religious services, etc. Suitability The area mainly consists of residential properties newly developed within the past decade.These residences are valued at a minimum of$750,000. Construction of a mortuary directly adjacent to these new residences would not only decrease the real estate value but may make it more difficult for property owners to market their property in the future. Secondly, SCI's proposal to develop adjacent to a historical building may be a cause for concern. The impact of such a construction is unknown at this time. Environmental Impact • There is a potential environmental impact should crematory services be provided by SCI. It is well known that a crematoria discharges potential air pollutants hazardous to the health and safety of the general 1/3 A & B 137 RICKY THAI 12920 Evermay Ct. Rancho Cucamonga,Ca 91739 TEL: (626) 233-2000 • EMAIL:RICKYTHAIt YAHOO.COM public. These crematorium emissions, in the form of a gas, include, but not limited to, carbon monoxide, unburned hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, lead, sulfur dioxide,volatile organic compounds, lead, etc. Nitrogen oxide,sulfure oxide,volatile organic compounds and unburned hydrocarbons are known carcinogens. Organic compounds such as benzenes,furans, and acetone are also emitted and react with hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride under combustion conditions to form polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans, both of which are carcinogens.Any machineries used to filter crematorium fumes have little effect on the toxins released. Scientific studies of cremation emissions have demonstrated each cremation uses around 20 liters of fuel and half a kilo of activated carbon for cleaning the flue gases; 160kg of carbon dioxide per deceased body being released into the atmosphere; and a high level of mercury released into the atmosphere. As the development is within a close proximity to residential homes, it places residents and their children at risk for cancer. Lead is well known to cause neurological deficits in children. Mercury released as a gaseous substance into the air would eventually contaminate water supplies and soil. It is known to cause embryological defects in fetuses and neurological deficits and respiratory symptoms in children. Noise is also a potential environmental problem.The area consists of mainly residential buildings. Building a 9,000 sqft mortuary would only increase the amount of visitors at a minimum of fifty individuals per service. • Traffic The neighborhood has already been affected by the number of vehicles. SCI's development would only exacerbate the situation and bound to put further pressure on the parking spaces available. It may also cause the roads to become congested. Congestion leads to access and no parking space for visitors' vehicles or delivery vehicles.The estimated number of visitors during a memorial service is unknown. Would such traffic be a cause for concern for residents who are disabled or in need of emergency services? Residential Home Impact The development would be unacceptably close to our residents. It is incompatible with the area. The notion of residing near a mortuary and/or crematoria is an unpleasant one. It violates the residents' rights and impairs them from enjoyment of their residential property and neighborhood. It is well beyond words and as a matter of fact depressing to observe memorial services at least once a week in a residential area.The psychological impact is unknown.Are there residents with post-traumatic stress disorder?That we do not know. Are there residents with chronic anxiety and fear of death?That we do not know. The direct images may inflict emotional and psychological stress. Additionally, the reactions of prospective homebuyers may make it much more difficult for a • homeowner to sell his or her home. Pennsylvania State University and the University of Wyoming 2/3 A & 6138 RICKY THAI 12920 Evermay Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91739 • TEL: (626)233-2000 • EMAIL:RICKYTHAI @YAHOO.COM published an article describing the economic impacts of developing a mortuary and/or crematory service operations adjacent to residential homes. The home values deplete over the years impacting the homeowners and could not be rectified [Agee, Mark D and Crocker,Thomas D (2010). Directional heterogeneity of environmental disamenities:the impact of crematory operations on adjacent residential values. Applied Economics,42:14, 1735-1745, 2010] In summary We fully accept and are aware of any assertion that, by offering a mortuary or onsite cremation services, they are meeting a community need that is growing. However,the development of it in our neighborhood consisting mainly of residential homes is unacceptable. In light of these many valid concerns, I respectfully submit that this proposal be refused planning permission. • Yours faithfully, 1 • a i 3ul.Y: ; 1 �. .... Homeowner • • 3/3 A & B139 Christopher &Chimezie Ikeanyi 12970 Evermay Court, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 • (909) 917-6705 December 12, 2011 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mr. Mike Smith Planning Dept. DEC 1 5 2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga RECEIVED Civic mong , C RECEIVED - PLANNING Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Smith, RE: REFERENC . py9W � } • COMPL k i INST THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE STORY FUNERAL HOME BY SCI FUNERAL SERVICS, INC. On behalf of our entire neighborhood and the neighbors residing in our quiet enclave (on Evermay and Exbury) opposite the site mentioned above, we wish to vehemently object to the proposed citing of a funeral home in our neighborhood and to urge you not to approve the request for the following reasons: 1. A funeral home poses serious safety and environmental concerns in a • neighborhood with many young elementary and secondary school students like ours. The chemicals involved in processing dead bodies are not healthy and children who play around the proposed site may be exposed to those chemicals. 2. A funeral home in our neighborhood will attract an unusual amount of traffic in our quiet, family-oriented neighborhood, which would lead to automobile accidents involving our children who play outside our homes. 3. Locating a funeral home in our neighborhood will expose our children to different types of people, including child molesters and gang members who may need the services of the funeral homes. The sight of gang bangers recruiting new members near a funeral home, as well as carrying out illegal activities near a funeral home is not uncommon in California. 4. Locating a funeral home in our neighborhood will have serious negative impact on the values of our homes. Our homes will be grossly devalued by the presence of a funeral home next door. 5. Without any knowledge of other structures that might be built next to the funeral home, we are led to believe that the funeral home may be one of the numerous high traffic businesses (including a half way home) that might be cited at the site. We want to see the comprehensive master plan for the entire plot of land. • A & B140 As parents of four little children, we are very concerned about the health of our • children growing up and being exposed to the dangerous chemicals used in processing dead bodies in a funeral home, particularly at the formative stages of their lives. We are also aware that a former employee of the city of Rancho Cucamonga has been retained to lobby for the authorization of the funeral home with a total disregard to the wishes and feelings of the neighborhood. This action is likely to expose the city of Rancho to a liability lawsuit. We are pleading with you to use your good office to save our children and neighborhood with the attendant menace of building a funeral home in a neighborhood we cherished and care so much for. Thank you in advance for a favorable consideration of our request. Please, feel free to contact us for any discussion on this issue. We can be reached at (909) 917-6705. Respectfully, 0 ti6 C1it-rnezie lkeanyiaW• • cerned Home Owners • • • A & B141 Neighborhood Petition T. Stop S r I Funeral Home File Number DRC21 -0 I •4 & O1O94D 'i 'd1s iX{ij�s..S' ftec,."4 r? _e&.A't 'L7ri`rY,..� S.ty .,. '-t 3' .a:tr`'y�t F�t�r:cT`,r`it f.rt. -� s � 4 yY'°sr1. x t i,�f} ar4 ai r .45 xe z a r ... ; o S r)g l.,qe'x s ; stt mJ.'sfr ir.wice-`' +S':G.at Q''a'�u-^mi`,,,st-i s cO r.r ai :r #5 4',„i�.�,zb a• c + %,,' This funeral7hom*e would change theA one and ambiance themeighbo choond Threaten the enclave and would,have:a deleterious;:im•act:;Pieasesi•n thisv•etition:and-lets our voice".be.h artht---° amterod No. Date Name Address Comments 791 S Signature IT i. .. Z-. co L. •• W,,,I Ti �• ,. I,1. 4u -a 5l�%. a to<<k Sze gi-z i L9- Ra* �- _ 7W! �z - 1I Kam,. 1 taco c.,AcC,/n -, Owe A t a.as 1 s,�Qi'U 3 st. LL /�' a ;rtoz I MOufl ' /m j�(L�{2C' Do/}-4- W0.vl� 1 %Z (a1 i, R a-r•Gam& ,cA. y i 13? Dot, f Lfr-r.•L t t Ye,•--7 C re s-LP•e Le et C P�`[ • - a 313 6ivH 1Hie 12855Gresi{iekt I—I0T elii3c1 0Orlif Wcw1t I {- ii � 1 2.55s7--,2.55s7--, (yes}fiat,' 2� F II c* i"13c1 poi)Jr- w t- 1-4 = � . f1AScc,� 7338 VI11eGvtS 1 '2,3 , `1t t • I . . 6 k)044. ..doi -13l cfee. ,00 �1/1 }f -"he 4Id i ' .MAl:. AXi-vt-A sJ Q 1/43\ o t e. ci n— -vc,,,,C-k- aft,Ld 'ef I I cram- ----, Is nil To bReen54,cr� Th I?Sg3 pbairtY 1.3/> CAoc� / Ili - I } e ' ✓c o_. /2_,sj 3 Ai L2 GiEsira- A JUL 1'6 2012 _0 RECEIVED - PLANNING EXHIBIT P A & B142 Neighborhood Petition To Stop SCI Funeral Home File Number DRC2011 01094 & 01094D a a " ri.'s :. i `" 'v' s e t n.-� z 4:w- 9 t ' ° , - + t' .i j . , , v r f x L . am . r Saa . .: y yj " atki,:iF'ehtw... oh t,. S".- a,a,;E s, mss em.sR- :Thrfuneral home would cange hetone and ambiance dof the,neighborhood Threaten h .encave and would hve a:deleeriou .im•actPleae si•n this•etitio .and' et our,:voice`be,heard + O.A.***:i% ':' No. Date Name Address Comments Signature 3 i t_iwt 12F6'6 Sn p G /� ��- Amy g n r >/ Ek`t'm ,109 u f'�'�ir lJ C ir', yGL f K.f q r ., ,•2 , „is.;Iza4 Cr —.. ' ca NA L1A)4-2 'Xidd (-4-. 0-3 et.-t -,--Thi,....' Z 1 tloltneu4 812,f- �!,. ....,. 1 24U 1 G Qs Q + , fl , ' 3/R1M Le, OS Li 7 r�,o,. /�-rro - w"� ( �� A Al N� `� � 3/011/ 7 Alb-now C,� ('. l G III . -7p rr R, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUL 1 6 201? RECEIVED - PLANNING A & B143 v ' Neighborhood Petition To Stop SCI Funeral Home File Number DRC2O11 01094 & O1O94D . r ' ry 0°' r : < 'd 4 ? r 'T, h y1kj LL f 6a i 0r. ! I /1.6,.,'`.,r7:6,6;,16+6:1:,41,,,:•=7:,7,723.::k i i ya. R 1 A ' y ,a y f It This funeral home would change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood Threaten the enclave and wouldhavewdeleterious..lm•act.;P.leasesi•'n'this,.etition and'let_ our voice:be'heard '4 ;?a,n :L� :.,;', ,_,,.; No. Date Name Address Comments _Signature 3fr/i2 Ni PlAIU 12i6; &tides n 3/47, titool riorm 4. oAtimbLul., /44,sciasi .SG( . G % wi (d+ctr'Se ` -)cf 34-(42 �l �tl, 7�2 3 1,7,-J 0, « AID al� �T� ,— , , „il ay, 4:th2c)742 3 (,,,, ,: i d f 46-1-.2._.- tAir et yr:,�/ Janes, f /Z`1�14 Ca%.� �g / ✓°fe% [/a(Ur • - 7//17 38 L��z.1s ()vim 0N---.S fa899F 6FrN,Q_E_ I}z b., I , acs Z Az.T 1 a_84S 1.AAeC. `1331 Sty{ Vt. ^L. cqf '+r7 ' !2 ` l C✓efl wo r»P.vW itefrt s .ArcA+(' ly fA- C C• aW Nc�M° — _ rt_ l� 6T y '7 zsS1 cL 7t/y6 to-27,,:,,e j�0 Fuitiz �/ /� e l3- c`'�u j 4,eYecl/ C% tic 3fJ k(,tar Lida -L('SinLrhu�. i 1 ( H C 1 n a c H er A c L . C'v 7.J4 t"\L d iirsal' h.\nil Q v 1 ', • rr ,'1/4,- 4 e7VZ-Ch .7 S'4-0 CaAlAiitkb � Q 1 9► $mt ltrmi0 PLacE lac cif fi0 �.,ii �{(L 11-Wit ' ' ?rr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUL 1 6 2012 RECEIVED - PLANNING 0 A & B 144 Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services... Page 1 of 5 S Home>Categories>Other>Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services Inc.from building a proposed funeral home at the corner of E Please let your voice be heard and join the community in • preventing SCI Funeral Services inc. from building a proposed funeral home at the corner of E Sign Blog Signatures Email friends Sign Petition Page: 1 , 2 . 3 Now! 1 Name:Tim Truong on Feb 26,2012 Sponsored links Comments:I VOTE NO TO THIS PROJECT.NO NO NO NO THIS IS A HOME PROPERTY NOT SOME KIND OF FUNERAL HOME. I DONT WANT TO SEE THIS HAPPEN.I VOTE NO!NOI NOI Flag 2 Name:Xuan Zhang on Feb 26,2012 • • Comments:NO NOT SUPPORT FOR THIS PROJECT THIS MIGHT HURT THE NEIGHBORHOOD NO Flag 3 Name: Douglas Ueda on Mar 1,2012 • Comments: Flag 4 Name: Lory Ueda on Mar 1,2012 Comments: Flag 5 • Name: Kimie Leho on Mar 3,2012 Comments:I DO NOT SUPPORT SUPPORT THIS FUNERAL HOME PROPOSAL. Flag 6 Name:Jennie Dang on Mar 3,2012 Comments:Please do not build a funeral home among our residential neighborhood.I STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS FUNERAL HOME PROPOSAL. Flag 7 Name: Danny Dang on Mar 3,2012 Comments:NO NO NO!TO FUNERAL HOME. Flag B Name:Jane Mrotek on Mar 3,2012 Comments:I am totally against having a funeral home within a residential neighborhood community. Flag 9 Name:Christian Leho on Mar 3,2012 • Comments:Due to cultural beliefs,funeral home in the residential area will not bring good positive vibe to the"neighborhood.There are just too many negative aspects about it.I strongly oppose this proposal.Thank you for starting this petition.I hope that it will be in favor of our community. Flag A & B145 http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci-funeral-home/signatures 7/18/2012 Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services... Page 2 of 5 • 10 • Name:George Sandoval on Mar 4,2012 Comments:No hearses through my neighborhood!!!!! Flag 11 Name:Wendy Sandoval on Mar 4,2012 Comments: Please keep our children safe!!!!! Flag 12 Name:Wendy Sandoval on Mar 4,2012 Comments: Please keep our children safe'""11 Flag 13 Name:Jose Torres on Mar 5,2012 Comments: Flag 14 Name:AU Karizi on Mar 5,2012 Comments: Flag 15 Name:Mark Horvath on Mar 6,2012 Comments: .. Flag • 16 Name:Anonymous on Mar 6,2012 Comments: NO funeral home in our lovely neighborhood please! • Flag 17 Name:Lisa McClough on Mar 6,2012 • Comments:Absolutely no funeral home. . Flag 19 • Name:James McClough on Mar 6,2012 Comments: Flag 19 Name:Jacqueline Wells on Mar 6,2012 Comments: Flag 20 Name:Anonymous on Mar 6,2012 Comments:This is an unfavorable business for our community. Flag 21 Name:Alena Paulson on Mar 6,2012 Comments:traffic is already terrible with the surrounding schools,access to the freeway and Etiwanda would be a nightmare.This area cannot handle any more congestion,please do not allow this project to go through Flag 22 • Name:Brian Paulson on Mar 6,2012 Comments: No Funeral Homes by where my children play!!! • Flag A & B146 http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci-funeral-home/signatures 7/18/2012 Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services... Page 3 of 5 • 23 Name:Sean Xu on Mar 6,2012 • Comments: Flag 24 Name: Mikhail Zeeb on Mar 6,2012 Comments:This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood.It would increase traffic flow,lower property values and the health risk(whether perceived or factual)would causes irreparable depreciation as much as 17%in some studies. Flag 25 Name: Ken Hong on Mar 6,2012 Comments:No funeral homes in my neighborhood.Bad for the kids. Flag 26 Name:Mira Nam on Mar 6,2012 • Comments:scary scary scary!i haven't been able to sleep just thinking-about a funeral home planning to come to my home. Flag 27 • Name:Ho Nam on Mar 6,2012 Comments:i strongly oppose building a funeral home here.funeral homes should be close to cemeteries.thank you. Flag 28 - Name:Anonymous on Mar 6,2012 Comments:While I support bringing more businesses/revenues into our City,I will not lend my support to this project because the location alone is terrible!Etiwanda is a major street but It is predominantly lined with single family homes and counts with dozens of kids walking to/from school • daily.Adding more traffic to this location would increase their safety risk and become an eyesore for an otherwise nice neighborhood.Additionally,there are several homes for sale(one right across the • street from the proposed site)that would be in jeopardy of not selling,dropping to an even lower value or staying on the market for an unforseeable amount of time should a funeral home be built. Flag • 29 Name:Chimezie Ikeanyl on Mar 6,2012 Comments:Building a funeral home so close to my home will not only increase traffic flow,lower property value and health risk,my children will be severly affected by It because they will be scared to go outside and play.So this will have a negative psychological effect on them, Flag 30 Name:Christopher Ikeanyi on Mar 6,2012 Comments:I am vehemently against building a funeral home right in front of my home.It is a horrible idea and will destroy our family-oriented neighborhood. Flag 31 Name:Maria Davis on Mar 7,2012 Comments:My 13 year old son has developed anxiety.when we were driving by the propose site one of my older kids made a comment and not long after that he start It asking questions about death and we're to the point where he has to have an evaluation to see If he needs counseling. Flag 32 Name:Anonymous on Mar 7,2012 Comments: Flag 33 Name: Howard Nguyen on Mar 7,2012 • Comments:This neighborhood does not need a funeral home.Home owners are suffering enough - from the economy;please don't place more stress on us with a creepy home of the dead just around the corner. ci.... fit & 8 147 http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci- neral-nome/signatures 7/18/2012 Please let your voicebeheard andjoin the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services... Page 4 of 5 ■ • 34 • Name: Matthew Wysocki on Mar 7,2012 Comments: Flag 35 Name: Don Hathaway on Mar 7,2012 Comments: Flag 36 Name: Sergio Castillo on Mar 7,2012 Comments: Flag 37 Name:Gladstone Rennie on Mar 7,2012 Comments: No to SCI Funeral Services Flag 38 Name: Frank Jou on Mar 7,2012 Comments: I am glad that we have this website to work together about this issue.My neighbor Kathy told me this issue two weeks ago because she received mail.But I didn't.So I made about 60 copies and passed to my nearby street(Crestfield and Gold Leaf and wild horse)house by house on these • passed two weekend when I walked dog. I talked many people and just 2 out of 60 t received the mail.The rest like me didn't know this till I talked to-them. It seems funeral company did this on purpose just mailed few household and claimed they inform all community.Anyway,I am now glad more people aware and we need to work it together to oppose this plan in order not keep our community better value and nice.Thanks again whoever created this site for community.See all of my community friends on Thursday 6pm on 03/08/12. Fiag 39 • Name:Jorge Borda on Mar 7,2012 Comments: Flag • 40 • Name: Martha Godinez on Mar 7,2012 Comments: • Flag • 41 Name:Lory San Gabriel on Mar 7,2012 Comments: Flag • 42 Name:Yesenia Gomez on Mar 7,2012 Comments: - • Flag 43 Name: Lindsay P.on Mar 8,2012 Comments:NO!!This is a residential neighborhood and no place for a funeral home! Flag 44 Name:Carol Pike on Mar 8,2012 Comments:A funeral home has no place in a residential neighborhood for all the reasons listed in the petition. Flag 45 Name:Chadize Li on Mar 8,2012 • Comments: Flag A & B148 http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci-funeral-home/signatures 7/18/2012 Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services... Page 5 of 5 46 Name:Philip Emchick on Mar 8,2012 • Comments: Flag 47 Name:Diego H Sevilla on Mar 8,2012 Comments: No funeral home in my Neighborhood!!!Why?Because my wife and I worked very hard to buy a nice home with all our savings and sacrificed a lot to get here.Never would we have considered this location knowing of any present or future funeral home in the area! Flag 48 Name:Vince Palmer on Mar 8,2012 Comments: Flag 49 Name:Laura Rocha on Mar 8,2012 Comments:I do NOT want my property value to go down and I do NOT want any more traffic in that area!! Flag 50 Name:Araceli R.Hernandez on Mar 8,2012 Comments:NO to a funeral home.Traffic is already bad and there are too many kids walking to and from school and Victoria Gardens.ABSOLUTELY NOT. Flag • Page: 1 , 2 , 3 • • • • • • A & B149 http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci-funeral-home/signatures 7/18/2012 Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services... Page 1 of 5 Home>Categories>Other>Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services Inc.from building a proposed funeral home at the corner of E • Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services Inc. from building a proposed funeral home at the corner of E • • Sign Blog Signatures Email friends Sign Petition • Page: 1 , 2 , 3 Now! • 51 Name:Ron Maez on Mar 8,2012 Sponsored links Comments:NO to a funeral home so close to a tranquil beautiful neighborhood.NO to property values going down because of a funeral home.NOIIIITI Flag 52 • Name:Wenjun Hang on Mar 8,2012 - Comments:NO!NO!NO! Flag • • 53 • Name:Wenjun Hang on Mar 8,2012 Comments:NO!!! Flag 54 • Name:Weide Shi on Mar 8,2012 Comments:No funeral home in our neighborhood! Flag 55 Name:Albert Miau on Mar 8,2012 Comments:No to funeral home Flag 56 Name: Kathy Miau on.Mar 8,2012 Comments:Let's preserve the value of our homes;no to funeral home Flag 57 Name:Chien Tu on Mar 8,2012 Comments: Flag 58 Name:Raquel Wysocki on Mar 8,2012 Comments: Flag 59 Name:Gilbert Mugica on Mar 8,2012 Comments: • Flag • A & B150 http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci-funeral-home/signatures/page/2 7/18/2012 ?Lease letyour voice beheard and join the community inpreventing SCI Funeral Services... Page 2 of 5 60 Name: Kaniz Rahman on Mar 8,2012 • Comments:I do not want SCI Funeral Services Inc near my home. I am totally against it!This will reduce our property value and please do not let them build a funeral home on this site.Thank you. Flag 61 Name:Anne Diaz on Mar 8,2012 Comments:NO funeral home-it is a residential area with enough traffic.And no need to lower property value in this area. Flag 62 Name:Araceli Hemandez on Mar 8,2012 Comments: Flag 63 Name: Ernie on Mar 9,2012 Comments:No Funeral Home Flag 64 Name: Francisco Oaxaca on Mar 9,2012 Comments:I am opposed to this proposed project.It is an inappropriate use in the proposed location. Flag 65 Name:Charles Pike on Mar 9,2012 • Comments: - Flag 66 Name: LINH TRI on Mar 9,2012 • Comments:I DO NOT WANT FUNERAL HOME NEAR OUR AREA.It will cause too much traffic when a funeral is one it ways.Buyers will not want to buy a home near funeral home.It is my religious believes that to be near funeral home"deaths"is bad.I am so against this.I live on Sonoma Creek Court. • Flag 67 Name: Howard Vo on Mar 9,2012 • Comments:NO FUNERAL HOME.Just bad in every ways for our neighborhood. Flag • 68 Name:Joo Yi Shono on Mar 9,2012 Comments: Flag 69 Name:Andy Jayadi on Mar 9,2012 Comments:no to funeral home Flag 70 Name: Ilene Setiawan on Mar 9,2012 Comments:no funeral home,it is bad for neighborhood and traffic Flag 71 Name: Carolyn Ybarra on Mar 9,2012 Comments: Flag 72 •Name: Edward Kim on Mar 9,2012 Comments:No way to the funeral homel Rao & 8151 http://www.ipetitions.corn/petition/no-to-sci- eral-home/signatures/page/2 7/18/2012 Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services... Page 3 of 5 73 • • Name: Edward Kim on Mar 9,2012 Comments: No way to the funeral home! Flag 74 Name: Edward Kim on Mar 9,2012 Comments: No way to the funeral home! Flag • 75 Name:Julie Lopez on Mar 9,2012 Comments: Flag 76 Name: Sylvester Maya on Mar 9,2012 Comments: I am opposed to this proposed development. It is not a good fit for my neighborhood. Flag 77 Name: e '' +1 Sylvester Maya on Mar 9,2012 Comments: I am opposed to this proposed development. Flag 78 • • Name: Pam Wehmeyer,Home Owner&Real Estate Broker on Mar 10,2012 • Comments: I'm a homeowner,but also Real Estate Broker-many cultures will NOT consider living in my development if funeral home happens because they will not live near anything related to death. Values will plummet again-a more suitable location should be chosen-this type business does not • require a premium location to be successful. Flag 79 Name:Steve Wehmeyer,Homeowner&Real Estate Broker on Mar 10,2012 Comments: • Flag 80 Name:Yusuke Shono on Mar 10,2012 Comments: Flag 81 Name:Juan Barayoga on Mar 12,2012 Comments: Flag • 82 • Name:Veejay Barayoga on Mar 12,2012 • Comments: Flag 83 Name: Sharon Goodman on Mar 12,2012 Comments: I live very near the site of the proposed funeral home.I DO NOT want this in our neighborhood!!! Flag 84 Name: Randy Goodman on Mar 12,2012 Comments: I am against this! Flag • • A & B152 http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci-funeral-home/signatures/page/2 7/18/2012 Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services.., Page 4 of 5 85 Name: Manak Sethi on Mar 12,2012 • Comments:NO to the funeral home Flag 86 Name:Rishu Marwaha on Mar 12,2012 Comments: • Flag 87 Name:Linda Cortez on Mar 12,2012 Comments:Well first of all,I know death is a part of life like it or not....but to be reminded each time I leave my neighborhood,and the traffic is will create does not make sense to me.The kids lots of them who cross Candlewood and have to see that from day to day,just have to say,glad mine are all grown up and gone.Please,there is too much land in Rancho Cucamonga,that would be better suited for a funeral home,but definately not and Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St.Thank you, Flag 88 Name:Anonymous on Mer 13,2012 Comments: Flag 89 Name:Seema Hirani on Mar 14,2012 Comments:• •Flag • 90 • Name:Lifen Hsieh on Mar 15,2012 Comments: No to funeral home • Flag 91 •' Name:Nancy A.McBeth on Mar 15,2012 Comments:There are several empty lots in Rancho Cucamonga where putting a funeral would be more appropriate.For instance,the corner of Baseline&Day Creek.The proposed location is located within a residential area. Flag 92 Name:Claudia Lim on Mar 15,2012 Comments:No funeral homes in my neighborhood please. Flag 93 • Name: Hsieh,Lifen on Mar 16,2012 Comments: Flag • • 94 Name:Fung SiuChung on Mar 16,2012 Comments: Flag 95 Name: Mino Pham on Mar 16,2012 Comments: Flag • 96 Name: Oriel Ojeda on Mar 17,2012 • Comments: • Flag 97 •Name:Tim Dudley on Mar 18,2012 Comments:I do not want a funeral home in my neighborhood. I attended the community meeting held on 3-8-12 held at Etiwanda Gardens Community Center.SCI claims there's a need in Rancho & 8153 http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci- neral-nome/signatures/page/2 7/18/2012 Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services... Page 5 of 5 98 • Name:Tim Dudley on Mar 18,2012 Comments: I don't want a funeral in my neighborhood. Flag 99 Name:Charlene Garrett on Mar 19,2012 Comments: Flag 100 Name:David Kang on Mar 20,2012 Comments: No to SCI Funeral Services Inc.in the neighborhood! Flag Page: 1 , 2 , 3 • • • • • • • A & B154 http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci-funeral-home/signatures/page/2 7/18/2012 ?tease let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SC1 Funeral Services... Page 1 of 5 Home>Categories>Other>Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services Inc.from building a proposed funeral home at the corner of E Please let your voice be heard and join the community in • preventing SCI Funeral Services Inc. from building a proposed . funeral home at the corner of E Sign Blog Signatures Email friends Sign Petition Page: 1 , 2 , 3 Now! 101 Name:MH Choudhury on Mar 21,2012 Sponsored links Comments:Even though one day we all have to leave this wonderful world but please we do not • want a funeral home next to our neighborhood for a constant reminder!Please build it somewhere else.Thanks, Flag 102 • • Name:Grace Buonavita-Sevilla on Mar 21,2012 Comments:My family and I are opposed to the development of a funeral site in my neighborhood. My property value has plummeted as a result of the economy and this would wipe out any possibility of a recovery.Grace Sevilla Flag 103 • Name:Jeffrey Char on Mar 22,2012 Comments:no funeral home! Flag 104 Name:Dominic Melillo on Mar 25,2012 • Comments:Concemed about property values,as well as traffic Flag 105 Name: Masudur Rahman on Apr 6,2012 •Comments:While I am respectful of a funeral home service,I strongly oppose the idea of SCI Funeral Services Inc establishment at the corner of Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St.The psychological discomfort of a constnat reminder of death in the neighborhood will have detrimental emotional effect on children and adults alike.There are two elementary schools in the area and our children will be subject to this exposure daily.This is would be unhealthy,cause public nuisance, deprive us of our right to the unimpaired condition of our property and reasonable comfort of our living.I am vehemently opposed to SCI Funeral Services Inc's proposal. Flag • 106 Name:Raina Huang on Jun 27,2012 Comments: Flag 107 Name:Gary Olson on Jun 29,2012 Comments:I live in Etiwanda and wish to add my name to the petition in strong opposition to the Funeral Home project planned for Etiwanda Avenue near Church Street in Rancho Cucamonga.If approved,this operation will degrade quality of life and further lower our already-devastated property values.Please let me know what I can do to help stop this inappropriate proposal.Thank you.Gary • Olson Flag • http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci-lunerai-nome/signatures/page/3 7/18/2012 Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services... Page 2 of 5 108 • Name:Susan Olson on Jun 29,2012 Comments: I am absolutely outraged at the city allowing this proposal to get this far!This is a sickening undermine to those who live in this neighborhood,and will be devastating to the area in general.It will become known as the"area by the mortuary."No one who bought into this area with their hard earned money,who now have mortgages they are upside down on,who are just trying to get by with their day-to-day struggles,now have this project in front of them to have to worry about. And all this after being told by every real-estate agent around(because that was what they were told by the city)that this area would be residential housing ONLY.Period.Not to mention the psychological impact of undermining those who find beyond offensive,the very presence of a hearse at any time in their life sharing the road,let alone having to be FORCED TO WATCH THEM NOW DAY IN AND DAY OUT.This proposal has not taken into account the quality of life issues,the extreme psychological toll it will take on those having to watch in as many services as they might have in a day,the additional traffic,hearses going in and out,possible coroner vans,funeral motorcades on their way to the cemeteries,along with the traumatized and somber family and friends in the processions that can be as long and constant as the circumstances allow.I cannot believe this has been allowed to get this far and this is sickening.I have NEVER been allowed a comfortable moment and have in fact been extremely undermined psychologically when I have to see a hearse. Hearses are used for only ONE purpose–to transport dead people.This will increase traffic in an area where there are pedestrians,children walking to and from school,and people who walk for exercise. NO ONE will want to be anywhere near this kind of business and It is the homeowners who would be stuck in a sickening way of life by feeling confined to not going outdoors and being able to use their own streets to walk on without feeling encroached upon by the business across the street.THIS TYPE of business changes the way people feel about their own lives and no one should be FORCED TO THINK ABOUT DEATH ALL DAY LONG–THIS IS TORTURE AND SO INCREDIBLY SELFISH– ALL PARTIES INVOLVED.This proposal needs to be moved to a suitable location SOMEWHERE GET THE HELL OUT OF RANCHO–WE DON'T WANT YOU HERE AND YOU SHOULD BE MORE SENSITIVE CONSIDERING WHAT YOU DO FOR A LIVING TO EVEN THINK • OF COMING INTO A NEIGHBORHOOD THE WAY YOU HAVE.AND TO OUR CITY COUNCIL- . GROW A BACKBONE AND DECIDE YOU ALREADY GET ENOUGH IN THE MILLIONS OF PROPERTY TAX DOLLARS TO TRY TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS TO YOUR TAX-PAYING RESIDENTS WHO WERE LOYAL ENOUGH TO BUY HERE AND NOW YOU WANT TO DO THIS? STOP THIS NOW! Flag 109 • • Name:L Downey on Jun 29,2012 Comments:This is outrageous and needs to be stopped.People work hard in choosing exactly • where they live and NO ONE wants to live near a mortuary.NO ONE.PUT it next door to one of the • city council members homes and see how fast they will find another location...Rancho Cucamonga does NOT NEED ANOTHER MORTUARY AND DEFINITELY NOT IN ETIWANDA!!!!They are being COMPLETELY INSENSITIVE AND GREEDY.This kind of business is necessary when and where it is necessary,but It is NONE of those things here.There is a LOT of money they want to cash in on trying to make here in an area like pristine Etiwanda—make no mistake—WE DON'T NEED THEM— THEY NEED US,AND ARE TRYING TO MAKE A POINT THAT IS A LIE.THE PEOPLE DO NOT WANT THEM HERE.This is so psychologically upsetting to even think about.The people in Etiwanda and Rancho Cucamonga deserve better and more people who WILL BE AFFECTED BY THIS are not being told for only one reason—they don't want opposition–and being in this business they ALREADY KNOW THEY WOULD HAVE OPPOSITION SO THEY DON'T GO OUT OF THEIR WAY TO INFORMTHE PUBLIC AT LARGE WHO WOULD BE AFFECTED BY ALL OF THIS AND IT IS WELL MORE THAN THE 660 FEET OF NECESSARY-TO-INFORM GUIDELINES.THE CITY MUST LISTEN TO THEIR COMMUNITY–THE SAME ONES WHO VOTED FOR THEM,AND THE SAME ONES WHO PAY THE TAXES THAT PAY THEIR SALARIES.THIS IDEA NEEDS TO BE SCRAPPED AND PUT NOWHERE ELSE IN THE AREA—I DON'T WANT TO LIVE NEAR DEATH AND NEITHER DO ANY OF MY NEIGHBORS!!I walk on Etiwanda for exercise and see the school children and the traffic going to the schools,churches and mall.This would be catastrophic to the area's already declining property values,let alone the cultural issues dealing with death,fears everyone has on some level re:death,and not wanting to have dead people thisclose to where they live,not wanting hearses driving around and funeral parties on their way to the cemetery.This is NO WAY TO LIVE.This is no way to treat the hard-working,tax-paying,voting,residents just trying to live their lives in a world where their home is sometimes their only refuge...even as they try to make payments on homes they are upside-down on.This area was specifically sold as"residential only," and that is the predicate upon which people bought into and now own all the homes they do in this area and of which so many are upside down and this idea would plunge them even further into an untenable situation they could never get out of.WHY WOULD THE CITY PUT THE VERY PEOPLE WHO PUT THIS AREA ON THE MAP,WHO PUT THEM IN OFFICE,WHO MADE THIS AREA THE BEAUTIFUL AREA IT IS–DO THIS TO US?WHY?HOW COULD IT HAVE EVEN BEEN A THOUGHT?WHO WANTS TO HAVE TO PASS A MORTUARY TO GET TO A FUN DAY WITH FRIENDS AT THE MALL?It takes my appetite away.You can't do this to us–how could you live with • yourselves?And a group of us only found out by chance this was happening the other day because we happened to notice for the first time,the sign so very"not in front so everyone could see"sign and the word"funeral"in front of the word"home."We were shocked,and this sign has not been up as long as they are saying,and with all the building going on for as many years as it has been,it is quite possible that for everyone passing it,it becomes"more of the same"of what they have come to A & 6156 http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci-funeral-home/signatures/page/3 7/18/2012 Please Jet your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services... Page 3 of 5 • 110 Name:C Downey on Jun 29,2012 • Comments: Flag 111 Name:Steve Wysocki on Jul 11,2012 Comments: . Flag 112 Name:Melani Sue Wysocki on Jul 12,2012 Comments: Flag 113 Name:Sonia Hernandez on Jul 13,2012 Comments:stop this project now!this is awful and not what I bought here to live by!I don't want to be near this! Flag 114 Name:Victor Angelo on Jul 13,2012 Comments: I don't want to live,work,shop,or be anywhere near a mortuary!What is wrong with you people at the city? Flag 115 • Name:Mary Angelo on Jul 13,2012 Comments:STOP THIS PROJECT—NO MORTUARY IN ETIWANDA!GO FAR,FAR AWAY! Flag 116 Name:Liz Knight on Jul 13,2012 • Comments:NO MORTUARY ANYWHERE IN ETIWANDA—NOWHERE IN ETIWANDA!!!THIS IS A PLACE FOR FAMILY,SHOPPING,GOING OUT.AND LIVING—NOT DEATH,NOT HEARSES, NOT LIMOS CARRYING SAD, GRIEVING FAMILIES.NOT HERE NOT EVER!It is hard enough on the people who made this area so nice and to totally downgrade it as a place for the dead who do not belong with the living?!!!!!!!!!!!Get out!This area has been special for too many years before it was even developed into what it is today and to desecrate the families who moved here with the • understanding they would be unto themselves as single family residents only without having to worry about something SO HORRIFIC!NO MORTUARY ANYWHERE IN ETIWANDA—WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER FUNERAL HOME!AND TO THINK THEY ARE STILL PLOWING THROUGH WITH THIS EVEN THOUGH THEY KNOW HOW WE ALL FEEL ABOUT THEM BEING HERE—AND BRINGING IN AN ELEMENT WE DON'T NEEDI Who knows what kind of people will be involved with coming to this area to"see"their dead whoever...disgusting! Flag 117 Name:Beckka Ebbenkamp on Jul 13,2012 Comments:NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!NO MORTUARY ANYWHERE IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA,ETIWANDA,ALTA LOMA,OR ANYWHERE ELSE NEAR HERE...WE DON'T NEED IT!WE ALREADY HAVE THE TWO WE NEED.GO AWAY YOU MONEY MONGERS!THIS MAKES ME SICK. Flag 118 Name:Karen Miller on Jul 13,2012 Comments:I HAVE HAD my business here in Rancho Cucamonga very close to Etiwanda and Church for many years.I DO NOT WANT THIS MORTUARY HERE!I do not want my clients having to go by that location and have to think about death.This is NOT a business for Etiwanda/Rancho Cucamonga.It will bring down values of properties,and everything around It.Mortuaries are not synonymous with bringing ANYTHING good to an area.They are in It for the money and take advantage of people when they are most vulnerable.This business is only here because they want to get a stronghold in the area and screw the community.Not this time.NO MORTUARIES ANYWHERE IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA—WE DO NOT HAVE A NEED AND ESPECIALLY ANYWHERE AROUND HERE.WE HAVE OTHER CHOICES WHEN IT COMES TO THIS SUBJECT and forcing people to live near something so vile and upsetting on a daily basis,7 days a week,as their"new" • way.ofdife Is disgusting.SHAME ON YOU SCI—YOU KNOW WE DON'T WANT YOU HERE.THERE WERE ENOUGH PEOPLE WHO SHOWED UP AT YOUR MEETING TO TELL YOU HOW THEY FELT. GUESS ALL THAT COMPASSION AND INTEGRITY gON YOUR WEBSITE ONLY APPLIES http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci-funeral1nome/signatures/page/3 7/18/2012 Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services... Page 4 of 5 119 . • Name: Diana Wills on Jul 13,2012 Comments:We don't want this here!! Flag 120 Name: Diana Wills on Jul 13,2012 Comments:We don't want this here!! Flag • 121 Name:James Lani on Jul 13,2012 Comments: Because of the nature of the business,I do believe the existing homeowners in the surrounding area have great weight in allowing this project to continue.If they don't want it,then neither do I. Flag 122 Name: M Kestermann on Jul 14,2012 Comments: I live with my niece many months of the year when I come home and I have kidney disease and am awaiting transplantation surgery. I am scared most of the time I won't get a kidney in time and could absolutely NOT BEAR to be around,near;or forced to see death around me at all times. I walk Etiwanda with my niece,we go to shopping,out for a meal,and it would just change how I feel about my chances.You are asking TOO MUCH from humanity to put up with such a SELFISH proposal to shove death into the faces of those who live there,and who have made that area what it is.You funeral home/mortuary people are very forceful,pushing,sickening,and black-hearted to do this when the community has already spoken—and we SAID NO! Flag 123 Name: Leon And Katie Salajan on Jul 15,2012 Comments:I do not agree with this proposal and believe it will psychologically effect young and old people.We deserve the right to live in our home and be free of the sight of death everyday.I am terribly sadden for the young children who will have to face this sight often. • Flag 124 • • Name: Laura Losquadro on Jul 16,2012 Comments: Flag 125 Name:Gee Kim on Jul 17,2012 Comments: Please do not allow a funeral home to be built in our neighborhood.This will NEGATIVELY impact the neighborhood in many ways! Flag 126 Name: Samuel Kim on Jul 17,2012 Comments:This is a family neighborhood and a funeral home is not a good not a good fit here. Flag 127 Name:Julie Lopez on Jul 17,2012 Comments: Flag 128 Name: Monica on Jul 17,2012 Comments:Nomnn This would not be good for this c Flag 129 Name: Mary Szitkar on Jul 17,2012 Comments:no mortuary Flag • 130 Name: Michael Bushnell on Jul 17,2012 Comments:We do not want this funeral home going in. A & 8158 http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci-funeral-home/signatures/page/3 7/18/2012 Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services... Page 5 of 5 131 Name:Anonymous on Jul 17,2012 • Comments:we support this petition.building a funeral home in this area could cause property values in the area to drop.In addition,it will create traffic problems. Flag 132 Name:MEREDITH YOUNG on Jul 17.2012 Comments: No funeral home pleaselllffir" • Flag • 133 Name: David J.Lord on Jul 17,2012 Comments: Flag 134 Name:CHARLES RITZ on Jul 17,2012 Comments: Flag 135 Name:Owen St Germain on Jul 18,2012 Comments: I live directly across the street on Etiwanda from this proposed site and I don't want this to be built here. Flag 136 Name:Jung Kim on Jul 18,2012 Comments: Flag 137 Name:Kestermann on Jul 18,2012 • Comments:Please remove my email address from your computer.This is a one time vote. Flag Page: 1 , 2 , 3 • • • • • & B 159 http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-sci- eral-nome/signatures/page/3 7/18/2012 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith March 20, 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 - HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. - A request to construct and operate a funeral home that will not include a crematory, nor conduct embalming, with a floor area of 6,911 square feet and a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of 2.32 acres (Note: The final area of the parcel is subject to the outcome of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691) within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Professional (OP) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located near the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street - APN: 1100-031-07. Related file: Development Review DRC20 1 1-01 094D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D - HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. - A review of a proposed funeral home that will not include a crematory, nor conduct embalming, with a floor area of 6,911 square feet and a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of 2.32 acres (Note: The final area of the parcel is subject to the outcome of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691) within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Professional (OP) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located near the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street - APN: 1100-031-07. Related file: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094. (Mike/Carlo) • Background: Previously, on the subject parcel and the parcel to the south (APN: 1100-041-01) an office/retail development comprised of seven (7) buildings with a combined floor area of approximately 56,000 square feet was approved by the Planning Commission (Related file: Development Review DRC2004-00716). The approval of this development application expired on April 27, 2010. Site Characteristics: The project site is a vacant, irregularly shaped parcel of approximately 164,200 square feet (3.77 acres) located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street. As part of the proposal the applicant has submitted a lot line adjustment (related file: Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). This adjustment will change the alignment of the property line that separates the subject parcel and the parcel to the south and reduce the land area of the project site (Exhibit A). Following the adjustment, the rectangular parcel will have an area of approximately 101,000 square feet (2.32 acres) with overall dimensions of approximately 350 feet (east to west) by approximately 307 feet (north to south). To the west, across Etiwanda Avenue, and north, across Candlewood Street, of the project site are single-family residences. To the east is the 1-15 Freeway. To the south of the project site, are two small buildings — a post office and an office, while immediately to the northwest of the project site is the historic Cour House. Neither the office buildings nor the Cour House are part of this project. The zoning of all of the properties located southeast of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street, including the project site, is Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties to the west is Mixed Use (MU) District, Victoria Planned Community. The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,265 feet and 1,255 feet, an respectively. EXHIBIT Q A & 6160 DRC ACTON AGENDA DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D - HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC March 20, 2012 Page 2 • Desiqn Parameters: The applicant proposes to construct a one-story funeral home of 6,911 square feet. The proposed funeral home will be located generally at the 'front' center of the project site and will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Sections 5.23.309 (Setbacks) and 5.24.304 (Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Setbacks) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Specifically, the proposed building will be setback from the property lines at Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street by approximately 93 feet and approximately 127 feet, respectively. The proposed building will be approximately 59 feet from the south property line and approximately 195 feet from the re-aligned east property line (following the aforementioned lot line adjustment). The proposed building will be approximately 33 feet from the common property line that is shared with the Cour House property. The architecture of the proposed building will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in Section 5.42.600 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed building will be designed in the California Bungalow style. Incorporated into the architecture will be traditional materials such as river rock, wood siding, and decorative details such as wood brackets and rafter tails at the roof eaves and decorative trim around the windows. All materials and details will be applied on all elevations of the building. The roofing will be composition shingle. The building will have a well articulated profile. At the front entrance on the west side of the building, there will be a prominent focal point featuring a 24-foot high entry portico with a low-pitched roof, decorative support columns, and a large paned window above it. On the north side, there will be a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet. This feature will have a low-pitched roof and decorative support columns. At the south side of the building, there will be a patio with a lattice cover. Because of the • raised roof over the attic, the roof line will be varied; a set of dormers will be included on this raised portion of the roof. Loading and unloading will be via a roll-up door at the east side of the building. All HVAC equipment will also be located at the east side of the building. The architecture of the building will be consistent with the design goals and policies of the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission including "360-degree architecture" and extensive use of high quality materials. Furthermore, the architecture of the building will complement the single-family residences that front the street along Etiwanda Avenue and the historic Cour House. As the building will be plotted generally at the front center of the site, the majority of the parking will be located on the east side of the site, to the rear of the building. Two vehicle access driveways are proposed - a main driveway at Etiwanda Avenue and a secondary driveway at Candlewood Street. Landscaping will be provided throughout the parking lot and perimeter of the project site. At the east (rear) side of the project site, the applicant proposes to have a large area of approximately 65 feet (east to west) by approximately 240 feet (north to south), which will be landscaped and otherwise left undeveloped to allow for on-site retention of storm water and future expansion of the parking lot. Drive aisles will connect the subject site with the relatively undeveloped parcel (APN: 1100-041-01) to the south/east with the intent of allowing reciprocal access in the future. Another drive aisle will connect with the Cour House property with the intent of fulfilling the development plans of that property that were approved by the Planning Commission (Related file: Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-01046). Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this • project. None. A & 6161 DRC ACTON AGENDA DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D - HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC March 20, 2012 Page 3 Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. The decorative trim around the windows and doors shall be constructed of real wood and not foam. 2. The river rock veneer shall be constructed of real river rock as opposed to a synthetic or man-made veneer. 3. Incorporate 36-inch high stone walls or bermed landscaping along Candlewood Street frontage to screen the parking lot. 4. The trash enclosure shall be constructed per City standard and shall incorporate some of the materials used on the building including real river rock veneer. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. • 2. The Double-Detector Check (DDC) and Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be screened with a 4-foot high decorative block wall, subject to the review and approval by the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services. 3. All doors shall match the color of the adjacent wall. 4. All signs are subject to the City's Sign Ordinance. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee approved the project as presented subject to the Secondary and Policy Issues identified by staff. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith • A & B162 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.10.010 • CHAPTER 17.10 Commercial/Office Districts Section 17.10.010 - Purposes and General Plan Consistency A. The following objectives have been formulated for the commercial and office districts for the implementation of the General Plan goals and objectives. 1. Provide appropriately located areas for office uses, retail stores, and service establishments to meet the needs of the community. 2. Promote and encourage office and commercial locations and designs to be conveniently accessible by bicycle and foot, as well as by automobile. 3. Promote and encourage office and commercial uses to be designed in centers or like groups for the convenience of the public and to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses. 4. Use and promote open spaces and landscaping to create a visually pleasing environment, as well as to distinguish city and neighborhood boundaries. 5. Intensified or regional-related commercial uses shall be organized and designed to • promote maximum opportunity for transit usage. 6. It is intended that commercial/office uses shall be organized and designed to promote maximum opportunity for transit usage. - 7. Commercial and office development shall exhibit the highest standards of site planning, architecture, and landscape design. • Section 17.10.020 - Commercial Office Districts These districts have been created for implementation of the goals, objectives, and land use designations of the General Plan. A. Office/Professional District (OP). This district is intended primarily for the development of professional/administrative offices and personal services rather than commodities. Site development regulations and performance standards are designed to make such uses relatively compatible with residential uses. B. Neighborhood Commercial District (NC). This district is intended to provide areas for immediate day-to-day convenience shopping and services for the residents of the immediate neighborhood. Site development regulations and performance standards are intended to make such uses compatible to and harmonious with the character of surrounding residential or less intense land use area. C. General Commercial District (GC). This district is intended for general commercial activities and services of a more intensive nature. These uses would be located primarily along major • transportation routes and would include major shopping facilities, major service-oriented EXHIBIT R 17.10-1 • 10/08 R A & B 163 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.10.030 . uses, major financial and corporate headquarters which are designed to serve the City or the region as a whole. • Section 17.10.030 - Use Regulations . . Uses listed in Table 17.10.030 shall be allowable in one or more of the commercial districts as indicated in the columns beneath each commercial district. Where indicated with the letter "P," the use shall be a permitted use in that district. Where indicated with the letter "C," the use shall be a conditional use subject to the Conditional Use Permit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a given use in one of the districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 shall be followed. Table 17.10.030 - Use Regulations for Commercial/Office Districts P= Permitted Use C= Conditional Use Permit Required Use OP NC GC • A. Offices and Related Uses . 1. Administrative and executive offices. P P p 2. Artist and photographic studios, not including the p p P sale of equipment or supplies. 3. Clerical and professional offices. P P p 4. Financial services and institutions, including drive- P p P through banks. • 5. Medical, dental, and related health services (non- animal related), including laboratories and clinics; p P p only the sale of articles clearly incidental to the . • • services provided shall be permitted. 6. Prescription pharmacies, (also when located within • a building containing the offices of 5 or more P p p medical practitioners) 7. Public buildings (city and county buildings, special p P p districts, and post office). 8. Public utility service offices. P P P 9. Public safety facility (police, fire, ambulance and C C C paramedics). 10. Related commercial uses (blueprinting, stationary, quick copy, etc.) when incidental to an office P P P building or complex. B. General Commercial Uses 1. Antique shops. - P p 2. Animal Care Facility (animal hospital, veterinarian, commercial kennel, grooming). a. Excluding exterior kennel; pens, or runs. C P P b. Including exterior kennel, pens or runs. - - C 3. Apparel stores. - p p 4. Art, music, and photographic studios and supply P p P • stores. 17.10-2 10/08 A & B164 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.10.030 Use OP NC GC • 5. Appliance stores and repair. - P P 6. Arcades (see special requirements per Section 17.10.030 F.). C C 7. Athletic and Health Club, gyms, and weight reducing clinics. P P P 8. Automotive sales and services (including motorcycles, boats, trailers, and campers). a. Sales. C - C b. Rentals. - - C c. Repairs (major engine work, muffler shops, painting, body work, and • - - C upholstery). d. Coin-op washing. C C C e. Automatic washing. C C C f. Service or gasoline dispensing stations (including minor repair such as tune-ups, C C P brakes, batteries, tires, mufflers). g. Parts and supplies. - P P h. Tire sales and service (no outdoor storage). - - P 9. Bakeries (retail only). _ p P • 10. Barber and beauty shops. p p P 11. Bicycle shops. - p P 12. Blueprint and photocopy services. p P P 13. Book, gift and stationary stores (other than adult P P P related material). • 14. Candy stores and confectionaries. P P 15. Catering establishments. - - p 16. Cleaning and pressing establishments. p P P . 17. Carpenter shop or cabinet shop. - - p 18. Cocktail lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment. a. Operated independent of a restaurant. C - C b. Accessory to a restaurant. C C C • 19. Commercial recreation facilities. a. Indoor uses such as bowling, theaters, billiards, etc. C C P b. Outdoor uses such as golf, tennis, C C C basketball, baseball, trampolines, etc. • • 17.10-3 10/08 A & 6165 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.10.030 . Use OP NC GC • 20. Dairy product stores. - P P 21. Delicatessens. - p p 22. Department stores. - - p 23. Drive-in businesses, including theaters. (other than - C C fast food restaurants). 24. Drug stores and pharmacies. p P P 25. Equipment rental yards. - - C 26. Electronic goods (i.e. TV's, stereos, radios, VCR's) P P -. sales and service. . 27. Fast-food restaurants. C C P . 28. Feed/Tack stores. - p P 29. Florist shops. P P P 30. Food stores and supermarkets. p P 31. Furniture stores, repair and upholstery. - P P 32. General retail stores. - p P 33. Hardware stores. - p . p 34. Home improvement centers. • a. Material stored and sold within enclosed P P • buildings. - b. Outdoor storage of material such as C lumber and building materials. - - 35. Hotels and Motels. C - p 36. Ice Machines (outdoor). - p p 37. Janitorial services and supplies. . - • P p 38. Jewelry stores. - p P 39. Laundry self-service. - p P 40. Liquor stores. - C C 41. Kiosks for key shops, film drops, etc. in parking lots. - P P 42. • Locksmith shop. - p P 43. Massage establishments. _ - C 4 45. Mortuaries and cemeteries. C C C 4 46. Music, dance, and martial arts studio. - P P 47. Newspaper and magazine stores. P P P • 17.10-4 10/08 A & 6166 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.10.030 • Use OP NC GC • 48. Nurseries and garden supply stores; provided, in the NC district, all equipment, supplies and material are kept within an enclosed area, and provided that P P fertilizer is stored in packaged form only. 49. Office and business machine stores. P P P 50. Office supply stores. P - p 51. Parking facilities (commercial) where fees are charged. P - P 52. Pawn shops. C 53. Pet shop. - p P 54. Political or philanthropic headquarters. P p P 55. Plumbing shop and supplies. - _ P 56. Photocopy. P P p 57. Printing shops. - _ P 59. Restaurants (other than fast food). a. With entertainment and/or cocktail lounge and bar. C C C b. Incidental serving of beer and wine but without a cocktail lounge, bar, P P P • • entertainment, or dancing. 60. Shoe stores, sales and repair, - P P • 61. Second-hand store. - C C 62. Shopping Center subject to provisions in Section 17.10.030-F.4. C C 63. Spiritualist readings or astrology forecasting. p 64. Sporting goods stores. - P P • 65. Stamp and coin shops. - P P 66. Swimming pool supplies. • - p P 67. Tailor. • p P 68, Taxidermists. _ - P 69. Thrift store. - C C 70. Toy stores. - P P 71. Travel agencies. P P P 72. Transportation facilities (train and bus, taxi depots). C C C 73. Truck and trailer rental, sales and service. - - C • 17.10-5 10/08 A & 8167 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.10.030 Use OP NC GC • 74. Variety stores. _ P P C. Public and semi-public uses 1. Day Care Facilities. C C C 2. Convalescent facilities. p _ p 3. Hospitals. C - C 4. Private and public clubs and lodges, including C C C YMCA, YWCA, and similar youth group uses. 5. Educational institutions, parochial, private (including C C C colleges and universities). 6. Libraries & museums, public or private. p p p 7. Parks and recreation facilities, public or private. C C C . • 8. Public utility installations. C C C 9. Vocational or business trade schools. C C C• 10. Churches, convents, monasteries, and other C C C religious institutions. 11: Emergency Shelters - _ C D. Accessory Uses 1. Accessory structures and uses customarily • incidental to a permitted use and contained on the P P p same site. 2. Accessory structures and uses customarily incidental to a conditional use and contained on the C C C • same site. 3. Caretakers residence. p P P 4. Amusement Devices, per Section 17.10.030-F. P p p E. Temporary Uses 1. Temporary uses as prescribed in Section 17.04.070 P P P and subject to those provisions. C C C 2. Temporary office modules, subject to provisions in Section 17.10.030-F.3. P=Permitted Use , C= Conditional Use Permit Required • 17.10-6 10/08 A & 6168 Etiwanda Specific Plan • Part II, Chapter 5 • • ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN , (ESP) USE DISTRICT - NC FC GC OP • Administrative,business,and professional offices . • P - P p Ambulance services . - ' - d C Antique shops i .. P -i p _ Amusement enterprises such as fairs, . merry-go-rounds, Ferris wheels or carousels, and similar uses operated on a • temporary basis C - ' C - Apparel stores : p - p - Art and artists supply.stores • P p p . Art galleries and stores selling objects of • . ' • art P P Automobile rental agencies - P p - Automobile repairs (major engine work, • muffler shops, painting, body work, and • • upholstery) C Automobile sales and service agencies - p . P ' _ Automobile supply stores P ' P P _ • Automobile upholstery and top shops - • - P - Automobile washing, including use of . mechanical conveyors, blowers, and steam cleaners - C C - Automobile washing, self-service C C C - Bakeries, baking of items for sale on premises only P - P - Barber shops and beauty shops P _ P P • Bicycle shops ., p - p - Blueprint and photocopy services P - P P Book stores p _ P C Bowling alleys _ - P - Business and office services p - P P • • 5-13 8/94 A & B169 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part II, Chapter 5 USE DISTRICT • NC FC GC OP Camera and photography shops and studios P - P P Candy stores and confectionaries. _ _ P - .. . P . - Carpet and rug sales and installation . . . P - p - Catering services p - p - T China and glassware stores • p - P - Christmas tree sales lots operated on a temporary basis P - P P Churches C C C • Cigar stores and smoke shops P - P C Cleaning establishments and laundries, self-service or coin-operated P P , P - Cleaning and laundering services and • pick-up agencies without bulk cleaning P • P P - Cocktail lounges C - - C - Commercial recreation indoor facilities (bowling, theaters, billiards) - - P - • Curtain and drapery shops • P - p - Delicatessens and specialty food stores P - P C Department stores,junior C - - - Drug stores and pharmacies P - p P Electrical equipment sales and repair shops - - P - Electronic parts and equipment sales . . P P P - Equipment rental agencies with no outside • storage P P P - _ Financial institutions, including banks, savings and loan associations, finance companies, and credit unions P - P P Floor coverings shops P - P - Florists P P . P p Food stores P - P - Furniture repair and upholstery shops . . - - P - Furniture stores P - P - Gift shops and greeting card shops . . . . P - P P • 5-14 8/8/94 A & B170 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part II, Chapter 5 • USE DISTRICT NC FC GC OP Glass replacement and repair shops . . . - _ p - . Hardware stores and home improvement centers P Heating and ventilating shops, not including sheet metal fabrication - - p - Hobby shops p - p "' - Hotels and motels • _ P p - Household appliance sales and repair shops p - p - Ice cream stores and soda fountains . . . P - p - Interior decorating shops P - P C • Janitorial services and supplies P _ , p - Jewelry stores • p • - p - • Leather goods and luggage stores p - • p - Linen supply services - - p - Liquor stores C - C - • Locksmiths p - p - Medical and dental offices and clinics . . C - p P Messenger services p - p P Mortuaries • - - p C Motorcycle sales and services - P P - Music and dance studios p - p - Music stores P - p - Musical instrument repair shops p - p - • Nurseries and garden supply stores in a building or fully screened enclosure with no fertilizer products in bulk form P p p - Nurseries and garden supply stores . . . - P P - Office and business machine stores . . . p _ p -. Office supply stores -. - p P Optician and optometrical shops p - p Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores P - p - Pet and bird stores P - p - • 5-15 8/94 • A & B171 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part II, Chapter 5 • • USE DISTRICT • .NC FC GC OP i Phonograph record stores 'P - P - Photographic developing and printing . . . P P P - Pinball and electronic games arcades C C . Printing, publishing; lithography, and • engraving - - P - - Private recreation buildings,or facilities C ' - , C Public utility or public service structures / and installations , • .C - P - Radio, stereo, and television sales and . repair ,, P ' - P • Realtors and real estate offices P P P P • Restaurants with incidental serving of beer and wine, but without a cocktail'lounge, , bar, entertainment, or dancing P p P P. • . • Restaurants having drive-in, drive- through, or walk-up service C • P P - Restaurants, cocktail lounges, bars, • • dancing,or other establishments providing ; ' live entertainment C C C - Secretarial services - P - • P. P Service or gasoline stations (including , . . minor repair such as tune-ups, brakes, • batteries, tires, mufflers) .0 ' P P C • • Shoe stores and shoe repair shops . . . . P - P - Sporting goods stores . P - p - Stationery stores P - P P Swimming pool service and sales p - P - Tailor shops _ P - p - . Theaters and auditoriums within buildings - - P P Toy stores • P - P - Travel agencies and bureaus P - P p Typewriter sales&service establishments P - P P Variety stores P - P - 0 5-16 8/94 A & B172 • Etiwanda Specific Plan Part II, Chapter 5 • USE DISTRICT NC EC GC OP Veterinarian's offices and small animal hospitals, including short term boarding of animals and incidental care such as bathing and trimming;with all operations - • conducted within a building which is completely enclosed, soundproofed, and air conditioned - - p .„ _ . Watch and clock repair shops Wholesale business establishments ' without warehousing or distribution . . . . Yardage goods stores .300 Common Provisions Applicable to All Commercial and Office Districts The following regulations shall apply in all Commercial and Office Districts: .301 Parking and Loading: Off-street parking and loading facilities shall be provided for each use as prescribed • in the Development Code. • .302 Signs: No sign, outdoor advertising structure, or display of any type shall be permitted except as prescribed in Article 5.25.406 and the City Sign Ordinance. • .303 Service Areas, Refuse Collection Areas, and Trash Bins: All service areas, refuse collection areas, and trash bins shall be completely screened by a solid wall or fence not less than 6 feet in height, or shall be enclosed within a building. Exterior trash bin enclosures shall be constructed to conform to City specifications. .304 Exterior Lighting: Exterior lighting shall be arranged or shielded in such a manner as to contain the direct illumination on the site and to avoid glare in nearby residential areas. .305 Exterior Mechanical Equipment: • All exterior mechanical, heating, and air conditioning equipment shall be screened from view. .306 Business Activities, Services, and Processes: • 5-17 4/96 A & B173 • • • PROJECT DISCRIPTION The proposed project is a development of multi-use facility on a 4.9 acre parcel. The project is comprised of the construction of a funeral home on 2.32 acre. The funeral home shall have 168 seat chapel and a gross floor area of 6911 S.F. There is a future plan to construct an office building complex with a total gross floor area of 24,100 SF on 2.58 acre remainder parcel. The concept grading plan provided as exhibit 2 in this report shows separate full access driveways for each of the.proposed facility. Each facility has one driveway oh Etiwanda Avenue and another on Candlewood Avenue. No common driveway for the.facifities is proposed .The driveway for the office building complex at Etiwanda.Avenue, will be located atthe same location as an existing postoffice driveway. •,ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY • • The traffic analysis:of trips generated:bythe 4:9 acre development is done by determining•the operating condition of the intersectionof-Etiwanda Avenue-at•Candlewood Avenue during.the street am.and pm pea •hours for the follow ing•time frames/scenarios:• - • • • • • Existing-year.2012 withoutproject traffic • • • Project full development in year 2013 with project traffic • • The analysis of the funeral home'driveway at Etiwanda•Avenue driveway is performed•with the chapel • f lled to capacity and`-withoutfunera procession..The•analysis.for 2013 project opening year condition assumesthat•the .peak hour of.generatorcorrespondsao the street peak hour. • The analysis ofthe funeral home escort procession traffic as it impacts thru traffic on Etiwanda Avenue is.performed:using data from.a-model :facility at 124 5. Citrus Avenue,Covina, California.The estimated time.ofroad-closure at the funeral home driveway, is determined'by-prorating data from the model on the proposed facility onthe basis of the chapel capacity. Signalized intersection capacity software-is used to determine possible queue on Etiwanda Avenue during the closure. The Transportation Research Board—Highway Capacity•Manual (HCM), 2000 Update, or most-recent release is used for the operational analysis of intersection. Un-signalized intersections are analyzed using Chapter 17 of the Highway Capacity Manual. This study is also prepared consistent with 'Level of Service Definition& Procedures" below. Level of Service Definitions and Procedures Roadway operations and relationship between capacity and traffic volumes are generally expressed in terms of level of service (which is defined using the letter grades A through F).These levels recognize that while an absolute limit exists as to the amount of traffic traveling through a given intersection (the • 2 EXHIBIT S ---_A &_6.174 • absolute capacity);the conditions thatmotorists•experience rapidly deteriorate as traffic.approaches • the absolute capacity. Under such conditions, congestion is experienced.There is general instability in the traffic flow,which means that relative small incidents (e.g., momentary engine stall)can cause •considerable fluctuations in speeds and delays.This near-capacity situation is labeled Level of Service (LOS) 'E'. Beyond LOS E,capacity has been exceeded, and arriving traffic will exceed the ability of the intersection to accommodate it. Upstream queues will then form and continue to expand in length until demand again declines. A complete description•of the meaning of level•of service can-be found in the Highway Research Board.Special'Report 209,,Highway Capacity Manual.The manual establishes levels of service A through F.Table A provides•.brief descriptions of the six levels of service, as abstracted•from the Manual. • TABLE A-level.of Service Definitions • • LOS :Description • • • .A No approach phase is fully.utilizedby.traffic and no-vehicles waitsionger.than.one•red • . indication.Typically,the approach appears:quite open,turns;are made easily and:neariy all drivers.find freedom.bf operation. • e This.service level represents.stable operation,where an•occasional approach phase is fully • .utilized.and:a substantiainumber.are approachingfull use.:Many:dtivers:begin to.feel • :restricted within platoons:of vehicles. • • • • C This.level.still•represents stable operation•conditions..Occasionally•drivers may have to.wait through more than one red signal indication, and:backups may develop behind:turning vehicles. Mostdrivers fell somewhat restricted, but not objectionably so. • D This level encompasses a zone of increasing restriction approaching instability at the • intersection. Delays to.approaching• ehicles•may be•substantial during•short.peaks-periods; however, enough cycles•with lower demand occur to permit periodic clearance of developing queues,thus preventing excessive backups. 'E Capacity occurs at the upper end ofthis service level. It represents the most-vehicles any that any particular intersections approach can accommodate. Full utilization of every signal is seldom attained no matter how great the demand. 3 • • — — — A & 6175 • F This level describes forced flow operations.at low speeds,where volumes exceed capacity. • These conditions usually result from queues of vehicles backing up from a restriction downstream.Speeds.are reduced substantially and stoppages may occur for short or long periods•of time due to the congestions.In the extreme case, both speed and volume can drop to zero. Table B shows the level of service criteria for un-signalized and signalized intersections. Table B—Level of service.Criteria•for unsignalized and Signalized:Intersections level of Unsignaiized:Intersection Average Signalized lntersection,Average.Daily Service . Daily:per:Vehicle (sec) per Vehicle (sec) • • A •:c10 no• • • B >10 and 5_ 15 . >10.and <20 C •>15 and<25 >20 and c35 D >25 and <_35 >35.and 555 • • • E >35end550 > 55and580 • F• >50 >80 Level of.Service Threshold Criteria Intersections under City of Rancho Cucamonga jurisdiction operating at LOS"E" or"F" are required to be mitigated to LOS "D" or better. EXISTING STUDY AREA•CONDITION The project study area condition describes roads that may potentiallybe.impacted bytheproject . • 4 . A & B176 • • Existing.Roadway.Systems • • Regional access to the site is derived from Interstate 15 and 210.The closest freeway accessramps are located on Baseline Avenue to the north and Foothill.Blvd to the south. Majorstreets and highways in the immediate:site.vicinity are Etiwanda Avenue,classified 4-lane secondary highway with bike lane, and Church Street also a.Gty classified secondary highway. Church Street is further classified as a functionally tertiary road in the City General plan. Etiwanda Avenue within the project limits is to be developed tothe general plan designation. The study intersection traffic control and lane configuration are provided in exhibit 3. • Existing.2012 Traffic•Volumes Existing 2012 turning movement counts at the study intersection was performed.on Tuesday January 31,2012.The count sheets are contained inAppendix A. Exhibit 4A.and 48 provide the existing intersection turning movementvolumes. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Tables land 2 provide the trip generation.There is no land use category for the Funeral Home use of a commercial facility. Most funeraihomes are also worship centers to provide religious services.The • weekday.peak.hour.traffic was therefore computed using the Institute of TransportationEngineers (1TE),Trip.Generationj 8t'Edition ).average rates for'Land.Use.560' (Church)torepresent the funeral • home land use..Land'Use 710(General•Office Building) is used forthe office•complex. • • •In order to determine the delay to traffic as.a result of temporary interruption of traffic to allow for funeral.procession, Custer Christiansen Mortuary in the.cityof Covina was selected as amodel site_'A funeral .procession event was videotaped.Thevideotape is provided as a part of this report.Table 3, • provides traffic data information generated from the model event. TRIP DISTRIBUTION&.ASSIGNMENT Trip distribution pattern for thisproject traffic was.developed to reflect existing traffic volume distribution at study intersection. Exhibits SA and 5B represen •the trip distribution and assignments. FUTURE STUDY AREA CONDITION • Future Etiwanda Avenue at the project frontage will be widened to provide atwo lane north bound with two-way left turn median. Exhibits 6 provides the lane configuration and controls at thestudy intersection and analysis driveway. The future traffic volumes without the project were generated using an expansion factor of 2%yearly growth projected to year 2013. 5 • A & B177 • • • APPROVED AND PENDING PROJECTS No project identified in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is pending with any significance to impact the study intersection during the time frames represented in this report. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Appendix.B provides the operational analysis worksheets for the analysis scenarios discussed in the analysis methodology section of this report.Table 4, summarizes the analysis results except for the result:of the funeral procession traffic analysis. Contemporary operational analysis,provided on Table 4 show that the addition of project traffic will have insignificant impact on the study intersection and funeral driveway. The proration of data from the model facility to the proposed funeral home facility and subsequent analysis, provides the following: IT TOOK 2 MINS OF ROAD CLOSURE AT THE MODEL LOCATION TO PASS 30 VEHICLES IN A PROCESSION AT THE LOCATION WITH 105 SEATS IN THE CHAPEL AND 115 ATTENDEES. IT WILL THEREFORE TAKE APPPROXIMA1 ELY 3M1NS AND 44 SECS TO PASS 56 VEHICLES (USING 3 PERSONS PER VEHICLE AND 1.68 PERSON CHAPEL CAPACITY) • USING SIGNALIZED.INTERSECTION ANALYSIS TO SIMULATE THE ROAD • CLOSURE FOR THE FUNERAL PROCESSION THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF QUEUED VEHICLES DURING THE PEAK HOURS IS EXPECTED TO BE 18. TRAFFIC'SAFETY ISSUES . The locations of the project driveways are expected to comply with city development standards and general plan requirements. Candlewood Avenue is classified a:local residential Street. With new driveways on Candlewood, it is recommended that the road be provided a centerline striping within the project frontage. The centerline will mitigate,potential presence of commercial type traffic and subsequent increase in ADT on the minor road. There is no sight distance issue between the new driveways and the existing traffic movements on Candlewood Avenue. • CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS Provide centerline striping on Candlewood Avenue within the project frontage on Candlewood Avenue. • 6 A & B178 SUMMARY&CONCLUSIONS • This section of the report summarizes the report and provides a conclusion of the traffic analysis on the proposed funeral home project. 1. Traffic operational analysis is performed at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Avenue and at the driveway of the proposed funeral home on Etiwanda Avenue. 2. The analysis includes the examination of the study locations under the following scenarios: • • Existing 2012 am and pm peak hour conditions at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street. • Future 2013 am and pm peak hour conditions at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street and at the proposed funeral:home driveway on Etiwanda Avenue.This analysis assumes the absolutely worse condition:that the funeral home activities occur at.peak:hour. It also assumes that there is no funeral procession in this scenario. • The driveway condition during`funeral rprocession during the am and pm peak hour. 3. In the project opening 2013_ the project traffic will insigiificantly impact the study intersections and the funeral home driveway without the funeral procession.activity. 4. It took minutes of road closure at the model location to pass 30 vehicles in a procession • at a location with chapel capacity of 105 seats and 115 registered attendees in the funeral services. by proportionality,it will therefore take approximately 3mins and 44 seconds to pass 56 vehicles (using 3 persons per vehicle and 168 person chapel capacity) 5. using signalized intersection analysis to simulate the road closure for the funeral procession, the maximum number of queued vehicles during the peak hours is expected to be 18: 6. A centerline striping on:Candiewood Avenue, within the project frontage is recommended to mitigate the impact of the presence of commercial traffic.. • 7 • ,_ — A_&__8179 • • ORDINANCE NO. 830 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2009-00691, AMENDING TABLE 17.30.030 USE REGULATIONS FOR INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS BY REMOVING FUNERAL AND CREMATORY SERVICES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN SUBAREA 4 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) AND SUBAREA 6 (INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT), ADDING CREMATORY SERVICES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN SUBAREA 14 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) AND MODIFYING THE DEFINITION OF FUNERAL AND CREMATORY SERVICES UNDER SECTION 17.30.030, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN 'SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2009-00691, as described in the title of this Resolution. .Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application.'' 2. In order to protect the public health,safety, and welfare, on August 5, 2009, the City• • Council adopted a 45-day Interim Ordinance to prohibit the establishment and/or operation of . human and animal crematories in any land use zone within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The purpose of the Interim Ordinance was to permit staff adequate time to analyze-the land use impacts of crematoriums and to find potentially suitable: locations within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. - 3. In order to protect the public health, safety, and welfare and as permitted under Government Code Section 65858 and following an advertised public, hearing,. on September 2, 2009, the City Council extended the Interim Ordinance an additional 10 months and 15 days. The extension of the Interim Ordinance maintains the current prohibition until August 2, 2010, The purpose of the Interim Ordinance extension was to permit staff adequate time to continue to analyze the land use impacts of crematoriums and to find potentially suitable locations within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4. On Feb 17, 2010, the City Council by minute action approved the initiation of Development Code Amendment DRC2009-00691. 5. On March 24, 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho.Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development Code Amendment DRC2009-00691 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 10-14, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt Development Code Amendment DRC2009-00691. 6. On May 5, 2010 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 7. All legal prerequisites,prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. • EXHIBIT T - A & B180 • B. Ordinance. • The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on May 5, 2010, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located within the City; and b. An Initial Study was prepared for the code,amendment and the Initial Study finds that that all environmental impacts from the code amendment are either of no impact or less than significant impact; therefore the proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, and will provide for development within Subarea 14 of the Industrial Districts in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. Subarea 14 is zoned General Industrial and is geographically suitable to conditionally permit crematoriums since it is adjacent to only one other Subarea, (Subarea 15 - Heavy Industrial). There are no existing sensitive uses within Subarea 15 that would be adversely impacted by a future crematory use within Subarea 14; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code. Specifically, the Industrial Districts have a stated .objective to organize land uses in a logical manner that avoids nuisance impacts between land uses. There are no existing or planned sensitive uses, including, but not limited to, hospitality or restaurants uses that would be adversely affected by being in the proximity of a future crematory;and e. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The'proposed text amendment will conditionally permit future crematories within Subarea 14. Subarea 14 is zoned General Industrial, and future crematories will require a public hearing and air quality analysis to ensure that all impacts are mitigated to a less than significant level; and f. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code, as the Development Code seeks a variety of industrial uses that will 'serve the City of Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino County. The text amendment will provide for crematories within Subarea 14 with an approved Conditional Use Permit in.a geographic location that is suitable-because of its industrial land use composition; and g. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the•General' Plan. The General Plan strives for land uses that serve local and regional needs. The City of Rancho Cucamonga presently does not have a crematory or a cemetery, and modern,crematories provide one of several options for the final disposition of human or animal remains. SECTION 3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: • Ordinance No. 830— Page 2 of • A & B181 • • • a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA“) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: 0)that the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings; the City Council adopts the Negative Declaration. c. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record.of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is • based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public :review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. SECTION 4: Based upon the findings and conclusions:set forth in Sections 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment DRC2009-00591 as • follows: SECTION 5: Table.17:30:030 Use.Regulations for Industrial Districts, is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A." SECTION 6: The following Land Use Type Definition found in Section 17.30.030-D-4-ziis hereby amended to read as follows: Crematory Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, services involving the care, preparation, and disposition of human and/or animal remains by means of cremation. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: crematories and crematories with embalming services. -SECTION 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or.preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of.the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof,regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, .subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 8: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this-Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published inthe City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Please see the following page • for formal adoption.certification and signatures Ordinance No. 830-- Page 3 of 5 A & B182 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 191h day of May 2010. • AYES: •Gutierrez, Kurth, Michael, Spagnolo,Williams NOES: None. ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None -0• Donald J. Kurth, M. ., Mayor • ATTEST: 1 719 i • I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 5'" day of May 2010, and was passed at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 19`h day of May 2010. Executed this 20"' day of May 2010, at Rancho Cucamonga,California. J=nice C. Reynolds, City Jerk Ordinance No. 830- Page 4 of 5 • A & B183 Rancho Cucamonga Developinern Code Section 17.30.030 • Table 17.30.030 Continued - Use'Regulations for Industrial Districts USE TYPES - ILAND USE I IP IGIIGI I GI IGIIGII IP I.IP lel IMUMI GI IGI I IPIGI IGI HI IP IP MU/DS SUBAREAS' HO 1 2 13' 4 1 5 6 7 e 9 10111112113114 16 161 • 17 10 COMMERCIAL • Niue Emanamment I I A A I A I A A 1 A A A A A Agricultural/Nursery Supplies&Services P 1 P P -P P • P P • Animal Care C C C C C C 'C C Automotive Fleet Storage Aulamotive•Fueling Services C C C C C P C C p AutomoMer Rental — _ Aulamotive/Light Truck Repair-Mina P P' P P P P P P P P P P P p Aumnothre?ru:lc Repair-Maier -P C P P I ' P P C C C Automotive Sales and Leasing C C C C AulwnollaService Court P P P P 'C P -_P P P- Auomative Sentoo Stellrm C C C C 'C Building Contractors'Orfce d YaNS C. C C C C C_ C C „Q, ;': 'P P P P P P P P _P P P ' :�:p::c • Building rantraz3or'c Storage Yard P ,.,. Building Malntenam Services P :�1.1,: Bu4dlnp&'Light Equlpnem Supplies&Sales . P C P C• 'C P P 'C• P. C I.0 P emi BuaIness:SUpply Retell&Services P• P P P .P 'P P `0:'. Business Supporttervnes - P• P 'C P P' C P P P P. P' P P P- P 7 ':%::• Communication _ P P- P P• P P:I P P 'P P P P 'P P ,m.. Convenience Sales&Services Cl, C C .P. P P, P '.._ :.:. Enteneinment I C .C' C .0 C- C.. .c:., Extensive Impau'COmmemial C 'C (C C 'C C C C �•.,,' .Fast Food Sales C C 1 C C. ,-'m`: -C C ' C. C C C.I•C C' Financial,Insurance&Real E s t a t e Services , PP P P P P P ' - _ Food h Sevens Sales G P C C P P . 1TT _ Cta E' C C . _ .rqa C -C C 'C ` ERAS • ea •stoma . : . • entails `C C C `t•'L.✓ C P C C P HoleUMeaI P ..y,. I P P • P ' C m;. . Indoor.Wholesele/ReteOCermnendel C C C C LC.O C •l:�-„ . Laundry Services . . -P • P P P MedtcatM1leahh-Care'Services P P -P P Personal Services P _p P P' :P P P P. p.:p P. ,p. ' Peuoleun Products Storage C C P P. P P P' C.:P, P P _ Recreation.Feclitlles • C :C C C C. _C .. Repair Services C P P. •C. P p C C 'P P P P p P •P C P P Restaurants P P P P P . Restaurants with Bar or Entertainment C LC' • C I C. C .C, C Specaay:Buildinp Supplies&Home improvement •P P C- Werehouse-Style ReaV:Mertia�sing•• - ... C- NOTES:• IP - Industrial Park P - Permitted Use HO - Haven Avenue Overlay District C ' ` Conditionally Permitted Use GI - General Industrial ❑ •'• Non•Marked uses-not permitted • MIMI - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial • A - Adult Entenainment Zoning Permit Required HI • Heavy Industrial MUfOS - Mixed Use/Dpen Space - Ancillary uses limited to 20 percent of the P' • Permitted with Master Plan approval for 35 floor area per Section 17.30.080.51. acres minimum - Refer to-Subarea 12 Special Considerations for additional restrictions • 17.30-5 • 11/OD • HIBIT A Ordinance No. 830.- Page 5 of 5 A & 8184 a tai 1594 North Batavia, Orange, CA 92867 • TEL 714.685.0123 • FAX 714.685.0125 5/29/12 • City of Rancho Cucamonga(Landlord) 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 • ATTN: City Manager RE:Cell Site Agreement-SB35XC032/Cox PCS Assets,L.L.C.and the City of Rancho Cucamonga/dated 4-15-2000 located at 5546 Beryl St.,Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91737(Site) City Manager, This letter is to advise you that it will be necessary,within the near future,for Sprint Nextel(Tenant)to make certain physical modifications to equipment within Tenant's Premises at the above-referenced location. These improvements are being undertaken in order to ensure the continued technical and economic feasibility of Tenant's facility,and are needed for Tenant to make optimal use of the site for the purposes intended by the Agreement. As described below, these modifications should have no significant impact on Landlord's property or operations. However, in accordance with the Site Agreement,Tenant requests that Landlord acknowledge notice of, and consent to,the following modifications: Swap out of obsolete electronics cabinets,antenna and other equipment at the site. This may include replacement of cabling and mounting apparatus within the existing lease area. Landlord's acknowledgement of notice and consent will not increase the size or amount of space being used by Tenant under the Agreement unless specifically stated above. Please indicate your acknowledgement and consent by signing below and returning one copy of this letter to me at the address set forth above. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter. Regards • • William Daley Land Use Planner - Reliant Land Services,Inc. 1594 North Batavia Orange,CA 92867 702-557-2170 Cell Bil1.Dalev(u)risp sa.com ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO This day of ,2012. • By: Name: Title: • This consent is only as landlord on the property and is not to be considered in any way as a planning approval of the proposed modification.Sprint Nextel will need to submit to the Community Development Department for any Land Use/Planning and Building Permit approvals. • A & B185 • Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article V, Chapter 17.108 1. Enclosed Activities. All activities shall be completely enclosed within the • building for the use. 2. Collection/Receiving Area. A dedicated collection area shall be established separate from the main patron entrance and may be located on the front, side or rear of the building. If the collection area is located in the front of the building, the bulk donation area shall be shielded from public view. Adequate directional signage shall be provided from the main entrance to the use to direct individuals to the collection area:The collection area shall be noticed to prohibit depositing goods when the store is closed. 3. Site Maintenance. Management shall be responsible for the removal of litter from the subject property, adjacent property, and streets that results from the thrift store (with adjacent property owner consent). Section 17.108.070 Crematoriums A. Applicability. The development standards of this Section shall apply to all crematoriums in the City. es.* B. Location. All crematoriums shall be located consistent with the following standards: 1. Located east of Interstate 15 and south of Arrow Route. 2. Located a minimum of one thousand feet (1,000') from public schools, community centers or libraries, and any residentially zoned property. • • • EXHIBIT U 17.108-3 A & B186 • ! r1 I li tE t U DTI S3u2I3d08d 71191 vxtal 11111 , I,i o.w.owo r I- , iin 1 1iie 1I 3`DYTAA yawn V1R131. •ny •� Q i1)i9 'i���I' jli .d ii 114 II 1 �o,1 � i qq it fig E IIJ 111 �`! a1� 1n ! i �U I I!C p� i t t• E i el •Y i ml p o it 16 Y.'E y t .dipi1q 9 I I/� "":! ii Z'7t.6p%..„:,l!'ili�� t!�thir limo d o ri_ is iip , „... 1:::: 0.0 i_ i :ill°'idll ��s "'` � "'�y�\ Ut \ \\\ of , ..F .,-,4 , to‘,". 1 _ ----4: To r lrisN . • \\ .„, \Li iteffr lir 1 6' i s [ ,_. s A;..,se• °` 'gal ion \ I r i _ t� j i,j1 I hn9�r�a�eiiea I iLll �, �G Bm p °- V s d : r . c i i� 1 I� trail i — -7.--- 1 1 S _, . ®I®�•1 ^—� II — I1 , '! - m'"'. ,11 i _ r ,�.—. E I .M. ..y"- 1:;II ��k'r Iq • EXHIBIT V A & B187 1t £ r a z m 3 E f, 0 c a ffi 1 < "*BID cr: ,R.2,. . t____._....,_,... ,______ ion"Hilm ,..„4... , 11..4 ......:_ v . .7, i .....41 . , J•T 1J�, R ' - 153L,JN}INUa f _ -- _ •a yb i r it `� 1. �t e;i' ,yR11 41'^ ''•i' ; r "1!.15:r.....,=,-,-. .. 'v A „la _ _r� MVO.. 'I' F „- � 'it : • � �� '� • , l. v VNVINOW VI O —•a-i tr-.-, f- --,21't... __ { y 7 Et CD ■ t /� IF.r- .\\\ • st �_ .# + 10-14 -+ . }/ .� {• �.� } ,\ `,. \\\ ? ..vt,'Iriit J. �- .-mss..41. _i, . 1 .,„....„,_.,. • - .1,, _ _ \-.- \st,..„. . .s. -,. . :. ----.... .., -- ii, g• _• • t, .,_ . ' CL f•s�; 4 ' '• b ' , CV 113WIN,.3 "�. ∎ --- 1t""-I~•.7'6 {.— .nom � is ,�. 0 lir-— i :-- , - --r■ '----. �'.•a) 0 ;). , , _ it_____ p ___ ,T J 1a 1 - fir ,,,,\\- ' , • • G 40 r i 1 !- j ...:'.'-'1,`-kl;A:-'\.-:1 ;,'%.; /'Q H. ' a ,L . ' �/ _ ' . HJ(IN L •' _ _ - L j 11 "- fir--� • FA�.1 `� a,l I% r CL ....... ..4.• �-- -,— 31 ,I.4.0*.,'1:1. -'I.}'--- . , _ __ �w7^,• _...,T. 1.. .. U •(l!1 s ' •__ . __ • -— •- * ---- • ccl 1‘1. . - . i U 1f --t — sly _ . 1 \ Via'"...e,,. 4'•' m. r!FFr 1' , r,�,, r4e°r�'` ., ID _ `S•' „' ,. :_ — __? ,.... - ee-- , ,.M (.. ..�' .. „' $t1e a' . -.f , �EXHIBIT W j L. ,.._ft,iltalit...,•1-,,..-• • -;- ' .: f:,.i.,;1 k, ,..,., ...._... -it r r`j;• J �! 0 c o T. o p o s ;15 a) U Y 6 O U n O E .- U 0 i O Uit O N > V4? ` Gl U CO ) p N U O p N y y O N Z co >, (9 00 a) N > c Z ¢ YA 0 > Z O , N W csi O a p 0) > N >, 4) R E , cn n ,,-[ v > Q ❑ Y o - p co .c � m ❑ Z p ' , � o w ip + 0 0 p •• ( >' > m 0 1.3.?0 to r Z ~ o O m r) >, ❑ el N.2 1- 0 .0 p -t p • M C ❑ m E p m ^ N >,, ❑ -o y a E F- aw>N E .- U ct : � = yi) to i - W m lc ce c w c m p } ..' c 0c , _ N O cs o pWp aci• � � �CO 1- ~ gym c3X c c c Q o0 -0 a) z z O) Nay- w z oW c c CL (DM M ocoQ o CD Cc c U F. (IOm 0W W 7NWrZNp Z Y1J W4.. C67NN J—a, N } J Q (O N CO CO 0 r CO co Z c e- 0 r N (N 7 r r (N IL. r r ,- - CO - < =. N RI C7,O N CO (D M CO 40 N O) (/}.(C'r N N (/) N CO e' N (/) r w e' N N U. ilk CN CD O ti. e- CO N u. r 2 .°,3I (v N N N N ))., 1-i ■ r - co ic ^ N N H 1 (D e- N N 0 M O N V (D cc O G ? N CV 0) - t_ O N M N N 0r ! _.1,/ O N :� ,).) 7 (y p) CD M O N O) (O O v r° 'n y O N T U F- N M e- N :D F- N E c 777 O N cr. c C ca 3 I` CO M O .r-- V' 3 N O (fl M O N c 0(� N N N CO N CO r N M F- OS ,.,-, N M al N O) (D RS e- co V) (n r N N (/) - r N (1) e- N• 0 •~ Sof , U. t` N N M W gl - N 1.L ('7. r N M I- e- 0 N L O N .7 L (0 M 0 � (D rte, F- N M I- N O N co CO Irl N 0) -E LID CV (O (O N O - co .1.1 N cis N (N Q � M � N � � Q � � N ao � NN 1.."" e- Imoi `Y � O O i N {� N N CO 0 u) O �'N N' (f) r CA CO U ❑ UN O O (8 Q N s /�� �y `- (9 l6 ,p CO 03 ui N O) CO O el O N CO U) rf M (6 (/) N V3 r N N (n N N 'p C mc VS PS � N M ° � NM N u n � ., u (nom N o iinZ I N r1 t (D M O �- N N M - L O M O F- M r r r 0 P. IIIE H/ ▪ N N r V a. .- r r N � 0 F- n • N CO y r °o ? 0 O Q FN °) N IV 412/ vs• til E V E V w � �► A A r ,r,N V) N CYe-;N CO M (/) I` �.N CO 0 W O m (0'r d cot C M O I` Q C N CO:M'O N J >, n-.r. V1 e- N Ni rh ......, ;�f ■ .,- e- N i r. CV 0) W Q f9 . N N rl '1°r? 1 M M y;:.-., (0 t.9 w N N N rn N' U }r � N ,., g r. co" E E 13 NM �•.3.r co N � . 0 CO . (D�� N E E C 0 ekb- •-'''+ F3 M r N (�+) � t' � I- 4 N N E.- 2 2 Z NOD = N O) 7 r co to 7 O tt r V) r OD N N m N (A M N CO• EXHIBIT X fte, ieci ws4 S - a%s :i:'iF!'6+:"0 4 `.�iL?i?'?n•:,C1.;.d � ': • ENVIRONMENTAL fig' Nov 01 2011 INFORMATION FORM !j Y T� g �-a i" (Part I - Initial Study) City of Rancho Cucamonga YPILase 7YP4 dr pHnt clef afly using lnk. se the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose"of this form is to inform the City of the basic,components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,.Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to,traffic,noise, biological;drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' . review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial:Study Part II as required.by CEQA. In addition tor the filing fee, the applicant-will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs ..for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any Special studies or reports. - GENERAL-INFORMATION: _ _ . • INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: ` 1$—�' ' ' • Project Title: Home Name &Address of project owner(s): SCI Funeral Services, Inc. 1929 Allen Parkway, Houston, Tx 77019 Name &Address of developer or project sponsor SCI Funeral Services, Inc. 1929 Allen Parkway,Houston, Tx 77019 • Contact Person&Address: HMR Architects, 221 Main Street, Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 4tudy Partl.doc Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT Y A & B190 r Name&Address of person preparing this form(d different from above): • Telephone Number 714330-5888 PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk C')is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff *1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheets)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. OProvide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north,south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): Soutwest Corner of Etiwande Ave. and Candlewood Street. Vacant parcel South of the existing historical residence located on the actual corner. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 1100-031-07 • '5) Gross Site Area(actsq. ft.): 2.32 acres '6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 2.15 acres dedications): 7 Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): none 8, Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental • (:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 2 of 10 A & B191 agencies in order to fully implement the project: Conditional User Permit • 9. Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals,mature trees,trails and roads,drainage courses,and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys,traffic studies): Vacant land, with no structures, trails, roads or scenic aspects. Site is relatively flat with a Southwest slope. • • 10 Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): None known. We have met with the Historical Society and received positive feedback regarding the proposed use. • I:\PLANNING1FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 3 of 10 A & B192 • 11, Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: Adjacent freeway noise will not affect day-to-day operations. • 12. Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: The proposed use is for a Funeral Home. See attached narrative from SCI Funeral Services in regards to day-to-day operations etc. There are no plans for future development at this time. • • 1a Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops,department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height,frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): North: Single-family residential South: Commercial East: Freeway West: Single-family residential 14, Wl/the proposed project change the pattern, scale,or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Panl.doc Page 4 of 10 • A & B193 15 Indicate the type of short-tern and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Exiting of a funeral procession (auto noise)will be the only short-term noise generated.Also see mitigation in • the attached narrative by SCI Funeral Services. '18, Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: None proposed. 17, Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: None 18. Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. • a. Residential(gal/day) Peak use(gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use(gal/min/ac) 19 Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ❑Septic Tank o Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) 25 b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20, Number of residential units: Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: • Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): • IPLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 5 of 10 . A & 6194 21. Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: • Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent(per month) $ to $ • 22, Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: • 23, Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24. Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment 8: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High • COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25, Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: Funeral Home. No preparation of the deceased will be done on-site. 26, Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 8282 s.f. • 27, Indicate hours of operation: 541-4 _ JM LJU�PA ( !� I �L� v 644iof'1AL 1 " 28) Number of employees: 4 Total: 7 Maximum Shift: During a service. See narrative. Time of Maximum Shift: • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 6 of 10 A & B195 • 29 Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate o him for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): ar• Pt r/ALr (t- ' SS p O' 64.1 ram cg... MSC . 4-"{ir 0.30- (E AtrE4cx c t2— (Co l NtpufZ• 3Q Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: f— 4 *31 For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818)572-6283): See attached reports ALL PROJECTS 32, Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. None • 33 In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials: Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides anc herbicides;fuels,oils,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, i known. None known • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 7 of 10 A & 6196 34 Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used anc proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown anc labeled on the application plans. • No 35 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that add"tonal infonna bn ay be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucam• ga. / Date: /o/t7/q Signature. Title: /Iris$4? ' • • I:PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 8 of 10 • A & B197 , G1 "ATE OF CALIFORNIA 7.5 MIN MENT OF WATER RESOURCES 2452 II NE CAMONGA PEAK) 449 R.6 w 32'30" : 51 052 .---.. --- --.-.., - - -----CI - I il ■- ; UTHERN— • _ --- 3• /35. '1 kr.....-^''-'350 l'-- , • Is - '---41 . ----- — 3:: II —_-' -. • is / ,i32 • . _ 41 ..____ ___--. 1 .- .... _ ,- • . _ _ - - --- . , ._- -- .• •11 -. - _-- I ,• • _.. a _ . a ' BASE -tr-RE--- ____ ______ • R. • - •" : ___, . --..01.• ---_,,... .-.411113 •,'. --------- - . •- Well ,1--- . . 11111111. u---.- II " . u , f--- -r-\r----..r _ --- --a--------_ u Il ttiWarida k /3,--- H ' PROJECT SITE 11 11 I , H I 11 11-----.'- ; _ ...- • 4.IIT.-----____---- ll- 1 -- .. = fr,,='-'' --, • -kcr / - if.-- ----a 4—.. -- a --- • 45 Il „.- II ,.----)270-. ,r.:',),r7':'''"1.): 4D iii ,... , • --- ' o• II ii. r. is.'...;.. II " I."1.I. __ . -,..'''''-----t 5 •• •1 •. •. - ill -.-------' ‘.0,4.'ll.."7.-ld, .'.43., ••-•)lEy.-1"----,250 1 0 II 141".•-i•iW. it I 11 0 bt. ------- •* ../ .."`:P /\ II , .„-- ,...,. ,..._____ ..---. ....- 77-::,. - _ /\.__./ \,____3‘.. -- \.--"--- N .1:' " I - --1,7.- P.-.....--,-...-... ..-.7-..-•-•■_,..,:-... , II "-:! .• '-•-•II. - ___.../\_ ' A 1 - 1 / --ih-"- It;_____.__--f■ 7-.7\_____ _,220-'l ...„....---...\ . „..,,, r____, 0,r4.44-7:1 .... 1: 11 ,.....- _ ___,.---- .;_.,i,;_4-,--. =====.-1..=.1 / \ / .-- -..__.-1220---._ H . ...- l .\., /--...,_____,...--- 1,.._31,4 .4__ ___ -..i- ---1-_____J ---- 'I II / Il ...j. -A1.1(21 -111,------'...--.---- 1/207 .4.P Fo 0 7- .11,,, a:.: .• •.•.--..! • BLVD /ah, _ (12 ._,-- IPIIIIIBjilljliglrlld :• CI ..--F11*31110111W I 11 'g. ROO/ ArAlir a INIMI I„,/ri-riol „ 11 1. ----lir- -- -L----------- "t'r------- a --lij\------ - //\. ----•-14----. JL 11 11 Etd.i r-1 II L' r' 1 • • ..•/, '±1,, T a .---- -4 ----__Q1 ____ ,./ j L ii.,.,__,. . A 7 •1 / 1 1 It. Al" 11. " -7 , ,•^-,170-" ,-,-. o _ ,- •■ g w z l''', 1 ' ./1 1 „......--' 11 -------- -- 7:114"-N_____ ---- il • • ' \ , i■ ;-.4-- / ------ I ---., U- -'-----AL-) .1---' \__, 4 /./ ----1.7 • ii: $ H 'H „.„,...— _1 .. . 11 ----. P I ARROW I '''' 4.41..--ROUTE ■-;---Jisia, y —•. . I r, • \ \---/ le \-______. - - . /—ill '--. -------- • . • _ H-3-0 ,11 11111.--. .1AS 1141\ 1--1 11■ • , E,t..i:(-.wS..t.ta.•nin•dg•a)■--7•-.--1-.-,T-,'A._._,•. 7•__\•W._HI—TINRA—M• ••—a.,, ,• fi,___. . + -- ',._--- o ST Rochester NI . ._,,--,..,/ t_ ____ _ _ -1:57'1. MR •\ II II ... ."--'N ' ..,' 1. =..) •Water Tank ___...,_....,--"---."-7-"Tin . ..,i . . _\.„../-----. ..... .\...----- .. I -----N— L......_. fi ._. _... . '.PowerPla kw. " 1 --' ' il MI 0 ••-;"- • iii.ii.. R ,_,s. ,. ,. , (".`...r. 11 FEEDER II . ..-- 1, .--- - • • •• _ - - T., --• ill ,/0° • •- .0 i 1 1 I 1/00 .,...1. II _, II - , - 1 i/00-■.,.._ , I H ,i II , \-:-/ l ':,\ , ,.//4.,„,. ._,- '--• ,JI 1 Ilia\ --""\ °\1 l•„.. 1 `,..,,....„.....ir::__ il/1 I 17.; ' ali,,,x,IMPIP ---T.7"/ (---/( -,080-, / ,'' IP n 1 •_____II k___ , ---‘----___. +.1 ''''":. • 1%ft-11' ,..._._ 070, ..: V\ -- ,------,----4 pr;7 1, Water'T' 1 \ /— N• ¢ i ''.1. -•' .6....447 ..._ ,.1 •xlieli ii u `-•--- -- " T rit_21c__ _ __ 1! ,____ • ,--"- --N. I E ` \ I ----------_-_5 1, -.---- -,-- ---------- '' ::-::•::. .., tl..7.1: ---r- . 11 /411111\14,..,, , 5 , a, ,, —J. \__..-------N,___, •:: '• / 11 : r.": .1. . - • ... . 1,I 1, Well 1 1 / lai ■,. ., o 11 k_.....-441 ,,. I: #7- -....„_e,------...,.. o /050 ...,.„,.,........ RANCHO •CTICA"MONGX ---'r_ a_ . 1.1. CORP ,• BDY •,,■ . oso . ....... * •• Vagidb•17 BOLINDAR' - --,-- - SA B RNAR•INOW; .\ . :..... ..,,,„„.- '...... •:. .. .. ;,.I...1 .-.._ \\ oReser0, ,__... P..,-", 7-441 .,_/"..' C.,,43,:.? ■ N...- P -ar. ■ --..._ ------ 1 ceL, . 03 ---A '-,- il.i.fgl --, -,."--'..1 k -A SI '......,.., •, 4." '..._B 1 98!. ' 0---- '‘,. / I4'.:9,....1 _ SLAG 1151-10-Sr-PEDWA''''Y 11". '.', ,, ., .. -.bozo-- ru i .....,,---•-.. .'........ • ,. ,, II zli --. - ;:-. ' - --•-_ ___ . : , - . ...! • .. .. . I., !.. , . •I ' .410 .1•,••, r. ... . .. . . .. .. . t•-•‘ f'.....1 . 0 . 1". zi''1,-.1- • . - . _....... , . • . , :. ,—,•_, , • .!. • . t.,t.. , . -•:-"-.., . . . ..- . . , ... i • , . , : . . . •.••" .. i .. ■ i ' .... . •J , .,I ■. . i 1' ■ •.• . .. . . ..• ' • I,.. : 4: .•';,i.':- -''-':'. ;:N" it. '...A . . ,.... . ... ... ' , . . ..-• • f T.'„ . i , 1 ' ,. -°.:'...--.':'Y., -- •-......-..-:. - , .. - . . IA ...,, . ..,,. .• ,:. ,'„ $ .-,-.'. -'-: v- I '• .■,, " , ... .1. .,-, il ; • ''.' .. . • .•- •',....i. i .. ..' : .4.:-:. .4 .••,'. . J.'''. ,.: ''. t , --1 •. i .':.,..,- . . , , . ' I '..: ',''. ' .• '. • 1 • . . . . . , 1. • = - •,- 1.11 .1, ,"--.--. • ,,-. .$.# . '-'',' ' • .".- \= 11.)i, : •'.,- 4,■• '.`:'.• :%'.,..;'■•••5•••• '. '41''. ,.•.:,, . • • •, ... 1 .• . .• . i. -- -1. . . ' . . •,:2---.• , . , ... -• . „ . . • . , • . . , .- sl,". 4,.L,,.- . • .7,,,‘ . . ... . L7-.4■,',-,,,,,,•.•--i• , - .,.. • ' :-...'...._. ,* . :,, fig,:., . i kr . .• -''.'-''.:-".•?:---,.`,-,.tL:' ., • -...., i!i, -- . -: .. ....•- . - .----:./..- - •-•'''..16i-or,.401...,. I -...-7.:----., :• • -.'-t-Pr'-'32017-7'.'''W. . --' , 0 • i' . . 911401411111it• ilti(75.1?'' .. —.' • " • -•- ----...".°•14V--k=".' 0 '''- ": !.. •-•'; .,-..,.:'—• . ,., . . , ., . . .,;:-. "7: ,*•;•..4-"•:N-,. ... : _.., If; - ,. ! ., , - ... .. -- ., .• :_ "7. , , . •. -...-.-• !, ' ..- , . , • .... . - ..„......:-..-..:,.........: E,;•-...'.-1.'-:•'•'''.-. 1` •7.44 ',, --- ''.''• . -- . , . .r• '1,. -., ' -.•:. ••,, - ' 1,:li •.•,.. .. .. • ..• ' • . , ! ....::' .. ■ . . . .. . .„ ' -- -. .• ..... • .,.. ..,., • ,. — : • • - • • - .. I. . . . ... ,.. ., . , .. , I '. • '... .'.,,:• , 1 ...,, , ..• ... I , .. t 1,,i;i..',"•. IV \ ' . . '....%.-1.• ,,,1 ' - , : . 1 ii' ......:''' i,•,,is' . !1...".-','ii, -.';1::';.,•:: , ;•*' .. , 11 .•.'•'411117' L'i..-°' ' •^,;' • • .' .. .. ,• • lit4-(4t:': • 1 t -'I, . .... -. . ... ., . tt::--•'''.'i'''.'•• i I .,.., . . . ,..•• -, . , , •. : • . . . . , ... ,r,., • . . • • . ‘i/i•-••• •. - • -•• ••• • ..-...- • . , . .. . . .. ... . .......... I •--- , . -. ••-. -. ..... .-•-. - ' .;:tv-,:.• „- , .,-.. . , r.. ': , ' . a' v, . ■ . ...i . , .. -, . ,f'•. ., , . . . • ' .0 • ..-•..,...,. ,. - • •.,'.•.;,. .- 111! -,:...... , . . . . A & B 19• • .• • ....., ' • . . . ' • ••••. • -,:.i'L:. .,A,:,: -. ,.-•. .1* ......::::,..... ....,,,,, r-= • . .-.....z. ......".'Vt• .- • k ' •• ' 'Pp. • .,,.. .....- . , . .. . . t '7,.•'4 . • ,.•_. .,. . . • .;..'A'f -•v- . ,., • . . '• \ . tv 11 t \ 4 • v..;•'.1 ' ;.:0 '.1 \ . . I .... 4. . . ....i ,. . . r-,1.;.' ,,,.. .• •.`,. ,xill(- . • ... S SV • . i • • , . . . '11'1"...,,It.P1,•;-'4'. - •f .- • . • • 1 !' 1 1.i.' .• • . ,. „ ,......, • .., ... • ■ ' -. ./ ' • •'t " 's ' •• ••■ . . o . , • - '' " . ',.•v,.._. . . , . • , . . . .•'''-•'' ',•'-'fA-. '1-•'..t-ii';''''C',... ••' - . '.?•*,:i°:,••'.•••=1k.4","i:s•_ '- . ' ,r; ••• '.;•11 '•,. I . 7 ' ' , 1 '-'Ff.:, e4-t-t_iv,`A•.;'•--A•,,,": . s le , . s.,:i. ,• . .,- -,,..-...:;,;-;••..,.;•,..•••••-•?.:,6 f .‘, - -. ' '4.-`.'4 • . . .., • • . . . .. ,,.. ,. .. '',.-4., ' . •2 '77.. ..--! -,/: ' • • - . ••••••'.-.-•.''4 . ; '' .14-..... ' '''' ' ; ' t .....' ,_':Te---,-,. :,i;4`..•:;•‘„ .'. .' .: f••- . .!'',, ,:,,,,:‘6.-.•,z.:..., .. - . . ... . . . • "r ; 1 • "I-! !• .-- . . ' . ' . . ... ••.,, ,..t.--,,,,-..• . - ........ -..... , .- ; ., .• . . .. . .. -,-. • . .. „ ...-:: .. -• '',.,-"Yr: ,•,e-,7.-..* ..:-."f ,. 111 IA.-, • „ _ , ... . .•-•-‘,';,,,,;,:k". •014'. ',.•••••:t.s,f.-4.'s••`' *; i••1 f , ,.. . e .0•4' i•- . '-: *:-:7,-' -6-6';' • .-., , . . -"..-5•A .".,.1•11:',1'.-- - -- , I . ,... '..N.f•:-.. ,:,-;--- .4....i.c, ,-,... ,. . L. 4: -'. • . 1 • • -•e,$•,-.4.....„; ,.., :......1,--V:Zii -14 : ".. -•',--': -.. - . ...at:- 01 ' • '. :. .... t :.. ---.4-.1"=.?-■:%."...Z.'6;.r---.. ' ‘ail ! -{,,. -., , ,-.,-....tr..,:-=,-,:ft..,4:,.....•.6 IR -'7,. .: _I": i. -' ' - ' —:''1;•'•ft•'1:•i,•,-:• ,,..., .."'.:4:-.•, .- ., , . „ . ., l,;.:---4_--:-•'•:-;,._:-..,:: t . -. .:.t.'., -. .:,-? , . Sc • ...,. ... i......-••-.,,i, --. , r ' I '''' • -4-.;.-- ' ; 1.,••;.;.4' • - .. =:7•-•::.:!.:•-,1!-',..'t /. • .-..-..-.a.-,,-...:, „.f,z,e•t,- V , .•...'.. . . . I .. , ,ije?;-'Ssffrj:',e7'.!• 0 ,,. ,,,, ••I; - ' - ' i - . ,, ,,...1 • , . ::::'''...,,,, ' ••-s, v.,, •`.24. '••Ts :4' 4 .•- . ,. • • e .;\ \ .. '..■ -14 ' ' • ... . - . • VSVVVV- •- . ,., ,Sc.- 'i- : .. 4. •• i: s.'?..). t,..'...'. '''"..4C; ' „..------- :.'''.1......1;'••: - .1 ::':':”t'-':'.:.1,"';','' ...•.-' j•.7 ' .:" --' ' • •• .e.1 . .- ..., , . . ,4': ,.::, : . . . _., .to:.. ..-— - • , .. ,. . -...''.17.:•...1 B 200"'''' ' — --- • A & . :•.:1 •.,.-,•-.,7,-r-r.ItIc ... ' ..,i'!„.,,_•1'..r;.i,F-,c.t!!:74-.4`,' t..-,,l' v\ • - ' ' : ,.$0,4•4:44,••,,..$ ..:-,' • ;•-:..1-,. •'..`. '4'57.'?., t- . . ..—,-. ,t., "Yr.`,..;'.1 .• .• ,F".• • . ....,: • - . it, ce$' -- I.-itie,.■•••....• '-`..$ ' 1. • ..-' • • --.' ' 'T ..•••••.•$;.•'.,•';''I.... .41, '$$'— ''.4"?' ,. 10 . . .:.....,. '331,41.—. 1$$ ',..,•..:).1; ...,‘ ft'. *"..":' 4, ..S\ --.— '=,`••••.. '" ,'• '.i....t:'r••••• v` . _, . . ., ,.- '...,• ::- ..; •:.'...:•f.:::':•'...;... ,•••'-'• V' . . . ...:•, v 1. ...• , . • '..........:-‘'.--,1,ivi.,-St.',.,;!'•'' " ( .ii:';k4p..A.. . -:,.;..*_', ''-, ;. • •',. ., -., , ,-,.;.0,-.,... •..!. r.' .',..44, .....,..,%:;. ....",5: .1.... ,...''''.?...V;:;..,.. • . •,,-; . •. ` ....: . . . . . . , . ... . .. . ;.... .. . , - .., -"..v . . -, ,.''''.•,.s.,,.....'....' :....`.:;...- : ..• ..,• . it: _ ...v:,.1...1:.1.,4.,.f •'-',...KAPr.it -'.. ,,,.-4(if...:;',.; •;•.: . . - . ;;.1..,,•it.;"?,4.‘,"•''s..-.4,/f..c41:24: .41..4, 1.'.;::.. - '.."-. . .‘, . . .4.•1,7-;"t; -,i1.4'114-$:•141,*f.2'';' ....;...,• ..':'t 1 ' .•'.., ji ,I•?..... . . ... . . .,. . • ,.. , . . - ,.., ., •-•'..• . • ...•• •.. .•:'i.,•.f.:'::':-,,:f.i.,i••,.„,?....,'41 e.i. , .. f ti,,..-7,••-,e:,,..,N.,,.1.,.':,• • . . 44,4e•-.. , , . • .-; '...1,4--,- '4,7f.,:f••:.:. ..,••- -x• ••.::::.Aos- . . . . . ' 4e,' tli-:;':',:.-."., ‘''-'-'-.,•-• • „. •./, .4.,- - • ... -4.-..--..... . ••:•;,::1•:Y•‘. ,44.• - -1,1r :.•• ,.' ;* . • •.,..,•ti.,..r!4•„.v.4•••• 4..-:.-eli?-'- , ...'.1 • .• • :. •.. - - : --. ..,k,• 4 .i: ,.....i7$:. :• , -••••. -''••••• .. ''''. -A.; . . • . •, 'it''•'' ''1/4'''.•'•i', . . „ . •' er * - •:'O.:" -:. •; . 1 . • . i .• • .' ‘;1:•.:: '• ' ' , .'•..: '' •,-,.1 ,..''.'.1,.......,:ip::_J.,...i'...(\''.'14.74,:: 1..;i: .. '..'....-..ir..41&. '..1 . .,,,,,,1. ,,,.•4 .,e. ''' 'V. '1- :•''''' ^ 1:!.. ,,',•YA1,31.1,i14'..:, ..,, .• 1.?•• ''' ''; - .. .$'."'..A:',-4'.. ... , ,-tiw. ... • 1".,:.......f. -..• ,..- ..!' ..,• • . "i, ....., — 'f•.vi--- I Fi •';••''' --. ' .,* ''7,t1;,..:1,ii'''''.."':. .: . ' .1. ,:. ••- .,.r. .-.....'"_ :'5• -zir -.I- fs. • : - ;, . -, • ::•;...,: .. 1-.."': .: ".,..-- :. ,. • ' ••' . .• -. • .-• '''!..s''4'. '. , . . :, :f• •• .i . , f - , ,,„.;.,,,., .• .c, ".■.;. .• .z, . - .t. s, ; •'. ` • , . . . . -•-!,-.I . ., , .-. . .. . ,, . . . 4.•,...7 , A f 34'..''ri. .f.'.i."'''' '-': ' „..,... ... ,•. , t•I '.'r""'''''..44: -.,..-." : .-.. 3 $ ,-..k , it•- ' !•:?$,i'.$.‘rt: f0E4A- •- p • ' ..r.' k- - -f....-4- • ksiC - • .'.'.‘,..4 - • .1,4: • fi..L.4'' : ',..:'.‘i . ,„7 — . ''L i,'.-fr'''',..4.-i-74i1".-1,• .-,‘It..., ' ' •' ; /.'-'.'S';';:i'ie• '44,-, 7x-h-I4, '.. . '-.-- ............- 4.-in'.?.'1.'''•-.— . .•n' •:•. -1•74.4.....,,:,-:'-'14,51..,:;,, .-, . .... ... . , '4':ri,',.....•,',....A.,1,1,'.:.i'';...::T I,, ..-,... . F-. . `- .. ..;..4.-1 . . ..- . -•. •...:,__ r 1 - .• .. 1 ., . _ . . •.-%. . . , •• . .. • . . ., ...-_--1'•••••:'.•-• ' -"'' • : -... ,'......1....-'....; .i-..:, ••••.; .1:.."'.-.4„. '.. 11; .',....;•; - • • t. -. c , . f.i .....: • • ,,.... ....4, : . • , ,..... t. ., . . , . . . . •...,,,.-. ...•,.• - ,., :._&.. .. . , ••• .s, . allt 'ir,'.. ,..' . ,..v.,- • .,•! 4i...!. —•••••'.,•:-. _--.--_.1,-.,--,. • , •, • ' •••::: . ,A 1 !, . ' ,,.,i..,,,_,.,■ .. . • . . ...''r•41;:::.. • ii.. - L. ''i "i.• - . • • • , • 1.• ',-•-• ' A. • • -... . , e -.j.'- -• ..,1,..•;...,: , , ,,. , . •";*-• r-„,--.,—..;,.c .1":;,-,,I.,,,'„r.t.r#,,a, •. .. . --.....# • :••,.,.".-7-,..,'.1.. • 4.:, • .•••' • '. • , . . . • _ 4 , . • . . ,1,: ‘. : ,. 41 , •, ...:, . .. . .., .,..1-1!........, ,1: .. ... . . . ,.., ‘..,. . ... .. , • . - , i .. .. iii. .,.. . . . :',,,- • ' . r.: '-,- , -.- - , .-:. 4. , . . „ 1 . k. • i 4-,:r '' •■••••' . . ... . . . , . .' l'.. •■•• le%.•—..1,.....' . • -. . • ' . / : ';;I!ja.'' . -- ' ..... ••. . . . •• P, • • • ' .• 1'. , 7', '-'• 1 '' t 4 a *--. a It ii,V ' • • a:, 1 ; it .{ .4 . t 1 _ t `• �( • • i ..,• .+rr. F' •,. , F r�`,• ,fix • .•" ;� to i � ;i,17�'°'_.. • if r t 7,-.,...• i i i l` .4 ,>,` :.',,..t;..".•= - - .34 `,•f\t � t > JR F i t } • � d �_� 1r' r .i .0,..t.4......#.••. tf �V4Hl , /• tl ,r 1• b .,..v,,,!•,f" 1° } �i r iai di� 4 . �t T c x . II fp(�p y __ y • Y; r =t• �,- tt..�� jr d"`�Vt:,...;,.•:.".f--pC r ,71,i.�: �: h ;r { { 4° •. �lK; r • LL -r . " 202 0 -... . , . _ .. ..., 1 .,•,:: - 'i ... A>4-..,''''- ':--"':4-!';' ...-•''•4. ';''.'7:r.!'—4, '.-.•.';',':•'"-..-:-..• "•' •'. - - ; ' • : t . . . , i . ..1 ..7.r'•.,' .•.' ,,: '''•■• . .. •... •. . . . . . , . ' ..•,i,...f4. i --.1:•,•-• ''''`.17:.• ::-• .. • ' !.. -..f1;,k,Vri,'::::.,..'...1.7.'..;0 ,:j.. - . . , ... . ., • . , . . p.4i,•••;: '.... ' ...... ! 1'4•'-;.-i,,•:!;.'-i';:-"- -----•:', 0 .,'• - .• - • • , ( , , •---- ,-•,,--- •- ••• , • , , • .4-t -- •-,x;•744.:. -•: •,•,•-- . • • '.'-;-.,'.:, ,,,,,,,,e,..x . ,:.. , .._._ , , •• • ,.4„I• t,-;4:••,-,..,•-i? ',--•--.-, . • , . .. .. , . -.-,:, .-•,•7 •tr,r;......-'. ..',.: . ! A.,..;„ ''',..,..:'..:2'.. s A • •- .. . .. , • . . . .i.I, • • . • ' • I , i . . ' ! .. .. . •1"4,, : ."••• ' • . .•*:et'''- . r. .. - ., . ... ■ , .. . . . 4 iv" IT • , - . . . , . -.• , ' . . • ‘47"." ..,i4.1 ..,.:;••.:,.."...t.-•*i k" ; , •. : ., -• -4,3i-...-.t., .,,,,,,,,.„,,• ' I k-M•'•,'":;•:.,- • , .• . .. .. .:•:,•,..r;:t... . t , .. • , .. ; . ••• , 1 . .,..,. ••,. ',:-.,,,. . • • • • , ,•t•-• • ,..,-., ,1:- . . ._. . • • . 1.: .... - .... . ..'i j.. ••— .,• • 4., ..z.....•.. ... :,....- / mr) 't: : . ,'. • ■. :."....-1 . , ,. ' ' ' i t '•• ••••• •. .....-.- : • '' 'I'. i ,',. • - • ' • ' .•. - • , -'•-••''' 'r'..."*.'• /at, t I I ..? - ,f:....1-"I'Ai'k' r_i_‘ -'' A 1 .. ., . - - •-•'44Rilcf . - - ‘.4, .. ...-- ,i,.-• :-..--1/4.--,...... *-.•-•-..---,..,,,. .-- -. --, , • ----:-.- •-•-.•;-....:_. -'•. • ,--- $:.-• . :.-.),". • --4.-, „_;-•.-.:,,:-6-• - • -'''...;.'ei'..•,-,40-''' 40 ---: '..-..- _.........--..,.-,-„, -. ---... • - ,-.`.-. .1.-.2••••.7',,`,--f"--;'..:74,:-., s- 4. , • -,..,:-. ,•-: .- 4: . •,,,.,, , - - t 4 •,--, •---. ,...,. --• , . .7-7- ... .;-•-• -' -- - 14111r5" . -;::-.,_••'-:';: ...',':- .:. ---. ,•,• -• :..••• .----•=•4•. --.-: , •• - _••-,-.-•.--, 4,-, • -- - •-,:. -•_.j::-4,-,-,•- •• • - . . -: .. •-_ ...., • •. -. ••:-. -,1; 4.',:. -' .• :-, ., .-,.-:. .. . . , . . . .. . . ...,. •,.... -•-•,' ........... 1 --.. . . 1 . ..,.;?, , .--• . . ••• .'..-..•,..A. !ILZ.:::,,. • . .....t-'• - ,..- ... •.• .m. 1 r , .,,.. . . . F,„,-....,.,...7..,,.:....,..%.•:........,.....-......:::.,..,,,...-......, A & B203 City of Rancho Cucamonga • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM it. Sill.. .- INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review DRC2011-01094D and Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094 2. Related Files: n/a 3. Description of Project: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D -A request to construct a funeral home (that will not include a crematory, a cemetery, nor conduct embalming) with a floor - area of 6,911 square feet and a porto cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of 2.32 acres (Note: Final area of the parcel subject to outcome of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691) within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Professional (OP) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located near the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street-APN: 1100-031-07. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 -A request to operate a funeral home (that will not include a crematory, a cemetery, nor conduct embalming) with a floor area of 6,911 square feet and a porto cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of 2.32 acres (note: final area of the parcel subject to outcome of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691) within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Professional (OP) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located near • the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street-APN: 1100-031-07. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Bill Reseigh HMR Architects, AIA 221 Main Street, Suite I Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 5. General Plan Designation: Office 6. Zoning: Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is a vacant, irregularly shaped parcel of approximately 164,200 square feet (3.77 acres) located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street. As part of the proposal the applicant has submitted a lot line adjustment (Related file: Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). This adjustment will change the alignment of the property line that separates the subject parcel and the parcel to the south and reduce the land area of the project site. Following the adjustment, the rectangular parcel will have an area of approximately 101,000 square feet(2.32 acres) with overall dimensions of approximately 350 feet (east to west) by approximately 307 feet (north to south). To the west, across Etiwanda Avenue, and north, across Candlewood Street, of the project site are single-family residences. To the east is the 1-15 Freeway. To the south of the project site are two small buildings — a post office and an office, while immediately to the northwest of the project site is the historic Cour House. Neither the office buildings nor the Cour House are part of this project. The zoning of all of the properties located southeast of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street, including the project site, is Office Professional (OP) • District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties to the west is Mixed Use (MU) District, Victoria Planned Community. The subject property is generally level with a A & B 204 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 2 southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately • 1,265 feet and 1,255 feet, respectively. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR — Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx— Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PM10— Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB— Regional Water Quality Control Board • SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP— Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G — Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x)Aesthetics (x) Agricultural Resources (x)Air Quality ( ) Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology & Soils (x) Greenhouse Gas Emissions ( ) Hazards &Waste Materials (x) Hydrology &Water Quality ( ) Land Use & Planning ( ) Mineral Resources (x) Noise ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation (x) Transportation/Traffic ( ) Utilities & Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance • A & B 205 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 3 • DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (x) I find that although the proposed project o Id have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this ca ause revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. I TED EGATIVE DECLARATIIO wJ/J/I be prepared. Prepared By: Date: 7/2f" Reviewed By: Date: (Q I 21 I 0— L. • • • A & B206 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 4 Lass Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Nth Than PP 9 Significant corporate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of • Rancho Cucamonga. c) The project site is located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and west. To the east is the Ontario Freeway (1-15). To the south of the project site are two small buildings — a post office and an office, while immediately to the northwest of the project site is the historic Cour House. Neither the office buildings nor the Cour House are part of this project. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project because the architecture of the proposed building will incorporate the design theme prevalent within the surrounding community, will have extensive landscaping (including a significant number of trees) where there is currently none, and perimeter conditions will be improved with the addition of sidewalks and associated public right-of-way features. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of street lights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. • A & B 207 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 5 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Witn Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (✓) • ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) and to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in • conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The project site is located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and west. To the east is the Ontario Freeway (1-15). To the south of the project site are two small buildings — a post office and an office while immediately to the northwest of the project site is the historic Cour House. Neither the office buildings nor the Cour House are part of this project. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to General Plan Table RC-2. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. • b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. A & B208 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 6 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially ignifi airo With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impacl c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The project site is located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and west. To the east is the Ontario Freeway (1-15). To the south of the project site are two, small buildings — a post office and an office while immediately to the northwest of the project site is the historic Cour House. The nearest agricultural use is a nursery about 1/2 mile to the north-northwest of the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) • applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the ability of the region to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore, the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) Both the State of California and the Federal Government have established health-based • ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (So2), coarse A & B 209 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially igr caiq wm Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMto), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants, while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), vinyl chloride, and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall, and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion • (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM13), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Non-attainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the CAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM10 and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air impact study was prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on November 21, 2011 that utilizes the California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2011.1.1 (CaIEEMod) methodology and CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993 to evaluate short-term • construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Green House Gas Emissions. A & B210 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 8 Less Than • Significant Less Potentially can Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact '7.71 73r 'r rEmissionsf(poundsfpeday)47 Y .?Sourcer 4�k d dt. ROGNOCF fr NO.� '!.jCO� } SOxt '"` PM+oS .r;r 2.s Grading 5.19 40.45 24.52 0.04 4.80 3.50 Building Construction 6.31 34.94 24.75 0.04 2.86 2.32 Paving 4.59 27.51 18.18 0.03 2.63 2.41 Coating 41.40 3.98 3.03 0.00 0.45 0.37 Maximum Daily 52.30 71.43 45.96 0.07 5.94 5.10 Emissions Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No ROG= reactive organic gases; VOC =volatile organic compounds; NOx=oxides of nitrogen; CO =carbon monoxide; SOx=oxides of sulfur; PMfo and PM2.5=particulate matter Short-Term (Construction) Impacts Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site • grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on-site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on-site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by-project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation, and weather conditions at the commencement of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. There will be a commercial building proposed for the project. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed buildings will result in approximately 41.40 lbs of VOC per day during the coating phase. The emissions would occur after grading activities, near the end of the construction period. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Emissions associated with architectural coatings could be reduced by using pre- • coated/natural-colored building materials, using water-based or low-VOC coating, and using coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency. For example, a high-volume, low-pressure (HVLP) spray method is a coating application system operated A & B211 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 9 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wth Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact at air pressure between 0.1 and 10 pounds per square inch gauge (psig), with 65 percent transfer efficiency. Manual applications such as paintbrush, and roller trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge have 100 percent transfer efficiency. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. The proposed project is a funeral home for the principal purpose of visitation of the deceased (that have been prepared off-site at other locatiohs) and funeral services. There will be no cremation, embalming, or burials on-site and, therefore, no chemicals, materials, and/or equipment for such activities on-site. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402, the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. • Naturally Occurring Asbestos • • The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. • 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) Short-Term (Construction) Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of.the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per • manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. A & B212 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 10 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Sigmfiialnt wm man PP 9 SiImpactnt corporate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil • during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM1p emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM1g emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel • powered equipment where feasible. A & B213 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 11 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially 3U man PP 9 Significant corporate Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build-out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (No2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Operational Emissions (Winter) Emission (pounds per day) Source ROGNOC NOx CO 50x PMtg PM2.5 Vehicles 0.57 1.66 5.26 0.01 1.03 0.10 Energy 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0:00 0.00 • Area Sources 1.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 2.41 1.67 5.27 0.01 1.03 0.10 Significant 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Significant No No No No No No Impact Operational Emissions (Summer) Emission (pounds per day) Source ROGNOC NOx CO SOx PMtg PM2.5 Vehicles 0.57 1.57 5.67 0.01 1.02 0.09 Energy 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 1.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sources • Total 2.41 1.58 5.68 0.01 1.02 0.09 A & 6214 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 12 Less Than •• Significant Lass pmamlany With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Significant 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Significant No No No No No No Impact Lonq-Term (Operational) Impacts Lonq-Term Proiect Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in commercial activity in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for the on-site building and electricity for the lighting in the building and at the parking area. Based on trip generation factors discussed in the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Albert Wilson & Associates on May 11, 2012 and the An Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on November 21, 2011, long-term • operation emissions associated with the proposed project, calculated with the California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2011.1.1 (CaIEEMod), shows that (the increase of all criteria pollutants as a result of the proposed project would be less than the corresponding SCAQMD daily emission thresholds. Therefore, project-related long-term air quality impacts would not be significant. Mitigation measures would not be required. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (long term) Lonq-Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 10) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 12) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water • consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. A & B215 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 13 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 17) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 19) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 20) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. • 21) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors — single-family residences generally in all directions. The proposed project is a funeral home for the principal purpose of visitation of the deceased (that have been prepared off-site at other locations) and funeral services. There will be no cremation, embalming, or burials on-site and, therefore, no chemicals, materials, and/or equipment for such activities on-site. No other sources of objectionable odors have been • identified for the proposed project. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading A & 8216 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 14 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant corporiate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. 22) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning • Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction Odors (short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. The proposed project is a funeral home for the principal purpose of visitation of the deceased (that have been prepared off-site at other locations) and funeral services. There will be no cremation, embalming, or burials on-site and, therefore, no chemicals, materials, and/or equipment for such activities on-site. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: • a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree . preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, .Natural Community conservation • Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? A & B217 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially ignifi ant With Than pP 9 Significant corporion Significant Impact Impact Incorporated Impact pa Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential and commercial uses. The site has been minimally disrupted for construction of paved areas for parking and access to the Cour House and the office buildings to the south. Also, there has been construction of some public right-of-way improvements along the project perimeter at Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangerQd species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore • no adverse impacts are anticipated. • e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) Neither the City nor the 501 are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation • area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of • Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). Immediately to the northwest of the project site is the historic Cour House. However, the Cour House is . A & B218 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 16 • Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact not part of this project, nor is there any improvements proposed with this project that will directly affect the Cour House. There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of • archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. ) Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but pot limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation . fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of-Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The • project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: A & B219 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No , Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, traineS and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San • Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by residential and commercial development. The project site is located in an area developed with residential and commercial uses. The site has been minimally disrupted for construction of paved areas for parking and access to the Cour House and the office buildings to the south. Also, there has been construction of some public right-of-way improvements along the project perimeter at Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • A & B220 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 18 • • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially WM1h Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant Impact incorporated Impact Impact 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) () ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the • project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault passes within 2 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3.75 miles to the north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„,7.5 earthquakes is approximately earthquakes, is 15.5 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area • is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of A & B 221 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 19 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation ,Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: . 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM1g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM1g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM1g emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM1g emissions. • c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the 501 for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater • and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand (TuB) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand (TuB) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. • A & B222 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 • Page 20 Lass Than 411 Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) greenhouse gases? Comments: a) Regulations and Significance - The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key • GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N20], hydroflourocarbons [HFCs], perflourocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]. The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit(°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with • emissions.across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping A & B 223 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 21 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially g5 i Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97.and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a quantitative based standard (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PM10, PM2,5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1,2, and PM2,5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's - Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive • receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality Analysis prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on November 21, 2011, the project would result in the following emissions of carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N20], hydroflourocarbons [HFCs], (perfiourocarbons [PFCS], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]). As seen in the tables below, the proposed project would result in a total of 13.80 MTCO2eq/yr from construction activities and 40.88 MTCO2eq/yr for area sources and 108.96 MTCO2eq/yr for mobile sources. Total project related emissions would result in 163.64 MTCO2eq/yr (construction, operational, and mobile combined). • Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel-powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading, and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on-site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates • GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N2O. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Construction greenhouse gas emissions are: A & B 224 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 22 Less Than • Slgnificant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially ati Than PP 9 Significant coiporite Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Source Totals for 2012 Totals for 2013 (MTCO2e) (MTCO2e) Grading 18.39 - Building Construction 226.07 44.75 Paving 65.36 .51.27 Coating -. 8.04 Combined Total 413.90 Average (30 years) 13.80 Although the emissions are less than the de facto SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT/year, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to further reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air • pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contactor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long-Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore, the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City • at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes • A & B225 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially W�Ih Than PP 9 SiImpactl Incorporated Significant Impact Inmrporeled Impact Impact • may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold, but the de facto screening threshold is 3,000 MT/year. Operational greenhouse gas emissions are: Source Emissions (MTCO2e) Mobile 108.96 Natural Gas 1.62 Electricity 25.91 Water Transport 9.85 Waste 3.50 Subtotal —Operations Total 149.84 Subtotal—Construction Total (Average 13.80 30 years) • Total (Operations + Construction) 163.64 The project involves the construction of a funeral home (that will not include a crematory, a cemetery, nor conduct embalming) with a floor area of 6,911 square feet and a porto cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of 2.32 acres and, therefore, would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees in the parking lot; a bike rack; construction of and corresponding accessibility to, public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARE Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The developer of the project will be required to provide water efficient landscaping; shade trees in the parking lot; a bike rack; construction of and corresponding accessibility to, public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. The proposed project will result in 163.64 MTCO2eq/yr total project-related emissions • without reduction from project design features. The long-term operation greenhouse gas emissions of the project will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed the A & B 226 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 24 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially wan Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Sign Lficant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact SCAQMD's threshold of 3,000 MT/year. To further reduce the emissions, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • . Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, deal flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. • A & B227 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 25 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Si Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The project proposes the construction of a funeral home (that will not include a crematory, a cemetery, nor conduct embalming) with a floor area of 6,911 square feet and a porto cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of 2.32 acres (note: final area of the parcel subject to outcome of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes divers opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping; shade trees in the parking lot; a bike rack; construction of and corresponding accessibility to, public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools and, therefore, is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32 and • therefore would be a less-than-significant impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? A & B 228 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 26 • Less Than • Significant Less • Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially "`th Than pP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. In any event, the proposed project is a funeral • home for the principal purpose of visitation of the deceased (that have been prepared off-site at other locations) and funeral services. There will be no cremation, embalming, or burials on-site and, therefore, no chemicals, materials, and/or equipment for such activities on-site. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. In any event, the proposed project is a funeral home for the principal purpose of visitation of the deceased (that have been prepared off- site at other locations) and funeral services. There will be no cremation, embalming, or burials on-site and, therefore, no chemicals, materials, and/or equipment for such activities on-site. No adverse impacts are expected. c) There is a school located within 1/4 mile of the project site. About 0.15 mile to the south to southeast is Perdew Elementary School at 13051 Miller Avenue. The project will be required to comply with the existing State and Federal standards on the use and transport of hazardous materials. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. In any event, the proposed project is a funeral home for the principal purpose of visitation of the deceased (that have been prepared off-site at other locations) and funeral services. There will be no cremation, embalming, or burials on-site and, therefore, no chemicals, materials, and/or equipment for such activities on-site. No adverse impacts are expected. • A & 8 229 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 27 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant ct c Mitigation Significant l Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2-1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. • h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a • lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? • c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, • which would result in flooding on-or off-site? • A & B 230 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 28 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wnh Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of • California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an • NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to A & B231 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC201 1-01 094 Page 29 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant will be required to submit for approval a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: • Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan • (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks'to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain • system to the maximum extent practical. Post- Construction Operational: A & B232 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 30 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than pp 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for • a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD • has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. • c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by • the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, A & B233 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 31 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Signficant citrprae Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a • Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this project — this is not a residential project. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and • north of the City. A & 6234 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 32 Less Than - • Significant Loss Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, ( ) ( ) ( ) (�) specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and west. To the east is the Ontario Freeway (1-15). To the south of the project site are two small buildings — a post office and an office, while immediately to the northwest of the project site is the historic Cour House. Neither the office buildings, nor the Cour House are part of this project. This project is a commercial development and, therefore, will not be similar in size to any of the existing residences in • the immediate vicinity. However, the architecture of the building will be consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the architecture of the single-family residences to the north and the west. The building will be similar in function to Etiwanda Gardens, a multi-purpose facility located to the northwest (across Etiwanda Avenue) that is used for weddings, funerals, family functions, etc. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Office Park (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan, The proposal is to construct and operate a funeral home (that will not include a crematory, a cemetery, nor conduct embalming) with a floor area of 6,911 square feet and a porto cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of 2.32 acres (note: final area of the parcel subject to outcome of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). The development of the site with a funeral home will be consistent with the land use designations as described in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the General Plan. The building setbacks, lot coverage/floor area ratio, overall layout of the site including plotting of the building and parking area, on-site and off-site traffic circulation, and landscaping are consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the General Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. • A & B 235 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 33 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wan man PP 9 Significant corporate Significant l Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. • 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) • plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing . ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the project area to excessive noise levels? • Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. The project site is within the 70dba CNEL noise • contour of the Ontario Freeway (1-15) which is located to the east of the project site. However, the proposal is to construct and operate a funeral home. Per Figure PS-8: • Noise Compatibility Matrix, new construction of commercial buildings and commercial • activity is "conditionally acceptable" provided that the building has closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning. The normal operations associated with this A & B236 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 34 • • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wth Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact type of project normally do not induce noise. Construction related activities such as the use of earthmoving and construction equipment, arrival/departure of contractors' vehicles and material delivery vehicles, and the construction of the building itself may create noise impacts. However, these impacts will be short term and less than significant when the activities are conducted in compliance with the mitigation measures listed below and the Development Code. Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise • mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. No loading and unloading activities • including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. b) The proposal is to construct and operate a funeral home (that will not include a crematory, • a cemetery, nor conduct embalming) with a floor area of 6,911 square feet and a porto cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of 2.32 acres (note: final area of the parcel subject to outcome of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). The normal operations associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. Construction related activities such as the use of earthmoving and construction equipment, arrival/departure of contractors' vehicles and material delivery vehicles, and the construction of the building itself may create vibration .impacts. However, these impacts will be short term and less-than-significant when the activities are conducted in compliance with the mitigation measures listed below and the Development Code. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic, it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. • Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times A & B237 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 35 • Lass Than Sig cant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mitigation hic PP g SiImpaci cororte Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impaq may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following. mitigation measures shall then be required: 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. • e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2-1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No impacts are anticipated. • A & B 238 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 36 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Nth Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The project site is commercial and therefore contains no existing housing units. Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. c) The project site is commercial and is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated. Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) c) Schools? () () () (✓) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The project site is located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street and would be served by a fire station, Fire Station #3, located about one (1) mile from the project site to the northwest at 12270 Fire House Court. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of Building Permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Victoria Arbors Park, is located approximately 0.5 mile from the project site to the west at 7429 Arbor Lane. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels-of-service, • which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. A & 8 239 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 37 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially Mirth Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less-than-significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) • Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Victoria Arbors Park, is located about 0.5 mile from the project site to the west at 7429 Arbor Lane. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. • • A & B 240 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 38 Len Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated !mind Impact 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature • (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian ( ) ( )• ( ) (✓) facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 311 vehicle trips daily. The proposed project is to construct and operate a funeral home (that will not include a crematory, a cemetery, nor conduct embalming) with a floor area of 6,911 square feet and a porto cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of 2.32 acres (Note: Final area of the parcel subject to outcome of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (8th Edition) for churches (the closest equivalent to a funeral home as a land use category for funeral homes for trip generation purposes is not available) estimates that each seat within the chapel area of the funeral home will generate 1.85 trips daily. Note that because of the nature of the operation of the funeral home, instead of traffic being generated continuously throughout the day, the traffic that will be generated will occur in pulses, i.e. the heaviest traffic will occur during funeral processions. Furthermore, the number of occupants in a vehicle will be higher as the attendees to funeral services will be associated with the deceased and each other (friends, family, etc.) and will likely carpool in greater numbers than would otherwise be expected for a typical • office or commercial development. According to the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Albert Wilson &Associates, assuming three (3) persons per vehicle and a chapel capacity A & B241 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 39 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact of 168 seats, there will be 56 vehicles per funeral procession. These processions are expected to occur about three (3) times per week. All other traffic generated by this use will be limited to the employees (less than ten (10), typically four (4)) and during visitations (of the deceased). For the purposes of the analysis and determination of potential impacts, the traffic consultant assumed that the funeral processions would occur during peak AM and PM hours. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of Building Permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each chapel seat will generate 0.61 • two-way peak hour trips daily. Note that because of the nature of the funeral home's operations, instead of traffic being generated continuously throughout the day, the traffic that will be generated will occur in pulses, i.e. the heaviest traffic will occur during funeral processions. Furthermore, the number of occupants in a vehicle will be higher as the attendees to funeral services will be associated with the deceased and each other (friends, family, etc.) and will likely carpool in greater numbers than would otherwise be expected for a typical office or commercial development. According to the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Albert Wilson & Associates, assuming three (3) persons per vehicle and a chapel capacity of 168 seats, there will be 56 vehicles per funeral procession. These processions are expected to occur about three (3) times per week. All other traffic generated by this use will be limited to the employees (less than ten (10), typically four (4)) and during visitations (of the deceased). For the purposes of the analysis and determination of potential impacts, the traffic consultant assumed that the funeral processions would occur during peak AM and PM hours. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. • c) Located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. A & 8 242 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 40 Less Than • Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Imact Incorporated Impact Impact d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontages of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The design of the project includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction such as a bike rack and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools. Because of the nature of the operation of the funeral home, the incidence of carpooling will be higher as the attendees to funeral services will be associated with the deceased and each other (friends, family, etc.) and each vehicle will likely have more occupants than would otherwise be expected for a typical office or commercial development. No impacts are anticipated. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by • the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and A & B243 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 41 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in • wastewater generation for build-out of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be.conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. • e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes • the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. • • A & B244 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 42 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant corporate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) either directly or indirectly? • Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. No impacts are anticipated. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant • impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short term and would cease once A & B245 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 43 • construction activities were completed. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) • (T) Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Michael Brandman Associates, November 21, 2011 (hardcopy to South Coast Air Quality Management District; all others refer to attached CD) (T) Traffic Impact Analysis Albert Wilson &Associates, May 11, 2012. Revised June 28, 2012 • A & B 246 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094 Page 44 • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby a•ree to the pro sed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point wher- • ear no,signifi 'nt environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: J Date: 6>76i/%2- Print Name and Title: (n.�ILL7h7t, 3 . /`e jeci • • • • • • A & 8247 • di. 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga g MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC201 1-01 094D/Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094 This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management-The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation)that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 A & B 248 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2011-01094D AND DRC201 1-01 094—HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. Page 2 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached • hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee)with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • A & B 249 a) '' fc s_ N :;:' N a 170' • O og. c c a,<;„ajr N 2 1,72 N N N N N )a ivLp T// TI C 4.- ' F d ri cr C r h.q 'k N t6 S., ~ r N Ce p r c :4' N 5 O :Rl} Q r _ '' Ce et; * U a 0 0 0 d ;Ili , ' --I w PI CCO @ N c N )a c _Q d 0 .. o : a a a a a o « ..0 o _ `o `o `0 0 a) a) - 1, 3 3 3 3 3 CO c ;c F\J N a) a) a) a)Z = � 5 � 'E . 5 d a a a a 4 CtI CC CC CC CC H C VAII 0 Fall C o ;-'fl J 16 •C c ltis::°. N c 0 0_4.4 3 • " p H • 'S W U o d ref.t ir', o Z 0 au. H U 0 0 m U r U ca L m ? Z m c s Y �e�j�a re- T." 3. co O Q CC ~ r a3 CC ta w p d a. 0 0 m Z N t ;•) O U CO Kr; - N = -0 6 a) a) _>.t a) C N -: C .,>, _T 'o (h L. N O = 5 re ._ CO �t t °o o ° m = - 070000 - -aa) -= m aa)) ' a 2r ea Z iq"iY.$j c o L a) N (ti .N. L m p' N a) C Q i N U 4: o a N N a. ` O N a) L U N 0 LL �' t Kt�; � O � N N � E —O a c 0 .__ .< (Y .cE N = ca Q L O a Q N N ,rya; c >, a.� m m m L T 3 0 g t m 3 c CC_V' a) 'g•frJ, 14 -o 7_- ) N > ° a) f6 ° m °) C7 '� E —'' ° C p Y_ ;� .,.: E o _ a m =o c o oa m � U EQ ° a a) G , L .0 a, a) o m= -o C E a) 0 _ v) _ a) 0 ■C .. yF" _ o '' mil - m >, ° CO mE0 � CDC ° > a - � o as T ��?.o;���?: L .0 z U C ... U C Elam O N @ C :11.1 O C Q `yyx,�,3x'.'`'t N N O C@ O C N O N 'O N C N ¢ a) a) N a) O CCi co -O .° >. .c V O 'tid '^ C fa N ,a C > O ° -o U N N o O L-. o L O X r -p N a) U a) r.-4, a) O E U a) ? E c c = o N r (pc Q > 0 L L 2 n 0E' Z' .-. y T to a) N O` < N g ^k a o a) ,... �'o` U coi ff ° m 3 o = v_°, c � m -2 N Ui ° � a a .. i t A" p E a o p N .08- g O a) ° O a OU M W N •N a '5 O 0) C L o O 850 ! owl a) .0. o U — a — a) N o) a a) ❑ o-v c Z G a Q acrFr`,<� =o F y 2 N �' a -o s o O m C 3 E 2 a) .0 3 .f c o) kTh.0r4 ° C N a) 'N — N N a) l9 _ C N a w C N N - N d C C O d . 2 = ii:n. n oo c U c o c -c c v, 'E c m m m ° ac N Q °- ns o • 1 , . 0 0 +3+ c C i,1 ` y O N C • L.. _ C C N O N E ul ) C "O E U ` N a) ♦. CIS O CN C U C O U N Ol a) N Nis N E m .2 °322 L C iq OV 4c = fZfa.^' N ,« ° O C ` O a C U o)U m e o V m ,..n, c as -E') o „ E o E -;-- c ._ m E o a— C o 0 0)C ..L 4 ° N N C N QI O a a) _a U) U) N C a 0 (0 'O O N _o ta d Q p * - kQ;, ¢ oa00E2o 0_ -ooaaa)) aa)) aa)) 0E2E QaaL Q °c Q � .E A & B250 a) . U � _ o a � s 0 O U U = C• o V V V -a- c0 Z N N N N V V V V V V 7 N Cu t d t o V Y • O co > G W O r .0 0 O 0 .c W •Ln 'V E > a a s 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q a N 0) 0) N N y C C C C C C _m co co _m co c co It e °' ° ° °' ° a a C o o ° 0 '� O 0 0 O O .0 .0 0 .0 .0 ) � v 3 3 3 3 3 E E E 3 Cw a) N N 0 a) O)N Of N ca CO mN �� O ` '> '> '> '> .> C EC) 0 O 0 0) 0 `= 0 `= 0 50 `C0 50 0 I- > m CC CC K Do Do 00 Do Co CC C U C U .` = N y =_. O d `2 LL U U U 0 0 0 U U U U 0 C) _m5 9 O C c C O O nm acs)) 1- O O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 re m m m m m m m m m m m a) a) C -o 0 U 615 'L_ co _ .N 0) 0 0 .— C O o) O L L N - 'C O 0 co co C N N O C a) co r0 i1 - a O a) W 0 C O O 0 ) O O U a)35 ^ C ° ` O o . N L -O C O O m ,0 O ti o `o E � 0 Nc° oa° 3m oa o � Um C�7c E .EL2 av a m Ea aa) .-- L `o (0C � QUE U ° o � d c m .a"0 a) r C `o- 0) o -o U 0 a) a) o O U .4 L co v CO '=O co 0 O L m !0 0) N (n cc > 0 a) a`) O •• 0 a a) 'O — aa)i L p N c °).0 • Lo , >,-0 o .0 U L N L>i vi to C • C N a 0) co c a.)° > m O. a ° N y L O° d t a) .0 .= C o _ ,., ° .n .c X c o ° m m w E aEi L S 3 a) m a) o a E � a c m Ems' m � a° w5 one � o �ooEa) 0 0- 0 - La > f0 co C X _ O O1'C U - N '� ._ >. 0) u_ a.- N '5 0 3 0 > 0l 0 'p ul C c to O) 0' �' a) ;a a •0 f6 CO .0 a) 18 O' 0 ur = - c - a >o (I) -0 a 9 0 ° !? ° a) a t E o .. � a) U `m Cr- m 6 m a-a)) i 0 DO O C N u) '- U p -6 0) 0 V E ° o C a) (o a = M •- ,0� C O me m mo .2 m 3 a CO Z) 0 CO v ax) a) c ° c 0) 0 = vU) a o c w 0 0 CO a9 cro m a a o 2 ( X -0 o a) °) ?))0Y E i. E a " K .-= ° a6 � CO " C-C U) r E O a L N �? O (o a) a) ,O O c _ a) ,2 0I N to N • C 0) as a C .` a) p �.) E L 0 d 3 — a a) w -0 = O) O 0— v4-) O o a) 0 U L E U C to C U U) C co O L o U 0 OI 0 C a E 6 0 N N ` ) •To ow a) 0 > 0 m L coo _y a O C O .L.. O c- 0 a-0 CQ C - a) •O• L al ° C )o co L d )/1 > O 0 a C 0)a) ccS„• Co ii `o CO ax) 3 Omar) CO � l- ° co3cwn 2Lm yN2a2iO Ecsmo CC F. CL CO - 0) 0 ° a) ca • E F m �co m UcC `m H To A & B 251 a) U C i 19 `O a c E • 0 0 o o C c CO O t CO c+) co ,a- co Z N 7 N N N N N Cu '6 C a) C a) I. w N 10 > O w = O O l6 0 . t CD d U U CD CO W co En En C C C C C C = co co co co as co w o a a a a a a o . o E% c/0i - 3 3 3 3 3 3 C •• a) m a) a) a� a) E 0 U) a) aa)) U)a) aa)) R > cc m cr cc m cc O) >. C G) • 'i = N is c O U Q O 5u. V 0 0 0 0 h C) o = O . C C C O o • m 0 a. 0 a. 0 Y O CO Y 0 "' N U) N Cl_ CO -0 0) 'o ` O a) O) co U) U) N U C a) > d c o O C o a) .-4 _o C L- +-' O V) N U d 'J6 d U N O) of C co co ca O .L., cD -_ _ v 3 U .c J a -o C N p o) )n ur ( -JO m o a00) 0a C in N -C aS .O > 0 0 N O. CD ÷D-;N O a) L .0 L_ o QL m CJ m co ca) ca a) as - 3C 3 .mo a O E C a1 al d J N N 'V 2 a) Uj L O L co 22 c L U) C O Y 0 T 3 O '- m J Cl U U) D_ 06 . J CD CD @ N O N U C J U 'O c y0 p a) C U U) O E ea U) •' • U) c a N c O O ` m CO L U) C U) -p 0 d U L ° > co a) ;O , a) 0 a3 N a) C a) Y J N c _ .. = 0 U) V a) N 4- o O a) U) O) U L N J O >, E - N J -5 +O+ -o J °3 E o -0 L C U L 'a a) E O co a.- N .c a) co co N = .N = a) c L c 0 3 o m o -o _o c c E ° .o E O '9 .4 Q 5 .0 _m o a LT 'E a) co O O) co O a) O .0 co co OU a U c O U n U d C U O 'O z E L O- O N U! N C co co -O a C a) a) N o N c c E N c E 2 a`) — a) > o o as E a) G o °_ 5 p).c co cu = > c o o U) E w m E o E _ .E E m co �>o., o f0 c) 7 V c .-F37.,c w •E E W N N CCD N p N J c y U OU O) OU L N OO N co -,-, 'o n' 0 co •Q O O 03 O a) .Z Y fa . o c` (n 'O ` a) C Y c N V C a) -O O N OO E O)L J N w ` 3 a1 V! a) O j a7 '-' c a7 Q N j,L N >,L co N C O • C L In' w E a) .LO. a7 U) i L a N N 2 N .a7 N .O O O a1 O_ u N -O c • E 0 E 3 a�i �-0 o f J >) — N (t O o) a) o) m � CC) )n = c = E c = E •E m -O- -o > m a m us °-) N U) > U > N N 6 O` E 0i) N > C U -C 'j Q 'C _m -0 N ° ,_C a) N aXi 0) .j C fo Z. E O N O 9 O` U O E L c c ` O O` a7 a) — O' N — a) — O .) — O a a) - o' H U 15 4. a d a3 cn L w 2 ° 2 2 a C a Q n Q E 2 Q E 6"-c Q L- L A & B252 CD w O m — a c E ;' 0 .) g y{ • U U r V co o'O C a) w- L W CD CU > 0 p' O U 5 > U a a a s 'a 4 ,* n n n a) n C N U) N O O V.); O O O O o 3 s)3 3 3 3 3 E m FD Y a K a> a> CU CD II C 0 e?`Fk 0_3 3 n— p N ❑ e 4 AD {L U .:. U U U U * ll) pk C a p p rid i O O O w 5 _"��5 m CO m R w co "Fe; ` d d a- d .n 'c ma' vooc ): - 0 = o5a) oc ;w a) 3ca y .e0urac m cwvw w .,"... 3 � . L .Ecw 0, 3 = c N V) E N o o r .z Was... .-,a) O — a 0 .N c ca a) `O_ O 0 t.w � C U � aiaEioaNio `4:.,) 0woocac cEc o3 co aEcac _cot CL 3 s � - a) mo "' oo0 (1) ( E c ° 0-c omL � � o C C N a) j 0 o_N ,4,)?;` ' " E 6 CO U a) U - a N N .V N C >m 3 n Fa ass ❑ -a a) an wa moy - '5 a2 c NEm V) O- m O o m CO w. -c ., o c E ca L U o .� U m m > `m E o o c aai m o c To i ; 'rn'oom .. o o- o) a) o - aa) wZ' � o wU .c�a-) E .Eow a) om E -_ = 'U) S g mom a) (/)•c � �r 4 6 p)in U ° 1- a 0 � N E c O -C c a) L U Fa m o a) U a) :1;‘,":):: 0 m O) co > a) w O a a) _a O O > ,_ O O E a) o .00t c . oa K ,- c > o) 0 C a) > om Z om � L >>aL a>i )a , ': -0a) o -`o w4co L - m . m@ oo-. E y C U [0 C > O) O .:3 N - a..0-. ..�. N = > > w co w C c — To o 0 0 w o a) 0 fO -o c s,-: o U 2- co o 'C a) 75 O o '- a) o _c w c c '6 17., ° o a. 0 r ca p c o Y:Fn o a, E E o > o o. uL 'E m e N Q mom E s � � a , c ` o ° O V Y ° L f--- - o ca'i ai a c 0i -0 o � m:�.L � o m rn m o 'c o 3I. �-_0 E .c; w a) a) m E - .`m c .5, o aa) O a) 'o) °� c E E 0 5) C C c O > Q m o 'B O o -•'a) a 92 I' To o cu — .L. O) C O O N 'O O O. O N N m N Cn a) Ol-5 hi C • O a) -O N -o E w 0 0 3 > a) O• w 0 0 O w 0 /0 w ,- a) E ` N O. o O c N > co N N .00 3 U Nun O +l.,- C N d N c L U o 00 a) a) ■O U N 00 O ._ .m ` �a E m c wNto 3 "12, m o a > NL w N 3 m U .EtS.. a m a. -o a `o `o < a)co 2 EE ¢ °) 3 Q � O. 3a. oc - d ± aa) Emao . A & B 253 0 U c O N r - a) Q c E • O O to U • R O v co Z co V C' V CO M • to to a 'c roc t o w O to > 0 w C 'C• (55 m .0 2 > °a °a °a °a ❑ ❑ a a a a a c o o 2 2 2 2 ..- o a - O 7.1 O a) U O O O O O fa ° c a) N a)= to N u N - N > c .c- c 'S a) a) P. > f a La 0 0 rx tr ec cc • 0 a c U `. •c N w �_ r • p m U U O it m m CO m ❑ 0 Ln rn ta = a o • N t c c O O 0.2 ai i ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ix 2 a a a m a a o c 0 U -c o L - -o CU C ill o n o L 'O L E N o L 0 c c (a r U U 2 ) to'' E .E N o> .- > N •• [a .E c ... c .+ > to o -o ° L-' O ri u) a "Eoa 'c 'c f0cE � ° a° Eo° ty aa) iiio0 V uu)• cc c3U E -C U .ma) U NN ON ° NN !°n ELo. dN 'd o a) .> °c' p -0poai -`°p m N ° c t._ O. co)inE � mo a' E : d d . W Q } 4` aityit • ."«; U N Z .�< v v -v v v v v ay r m , r Ff.~- -0 C q} dC 0 . 0 C N nit'. O :, a m o O - t C O O i " O O O Pii, O U w 0 .2 U U - U U` `O 'fa t U p = w. rvn..is ,C N .0 N C C m 1A 'Cu 'C C 'E C d O 0 O 0 = O O O F 4 = 0 = O O O F D U D U D U D U *,.'.. D U D U D O , Yi a.Cf T jjTO a C N C O U U U U U U Ell d • 0 D r O !ky.; LL W `10 m m m co r m m m v .p 'D d m o= "' "0 co "0 C O C 0 III C L O) 0 d in 0 L C C O . o o C_ C C O a ;r •- C 'CO C "O C O 0) C L .0 C c m c = 2 d d >i .2 m U m ' M m '0 N Cill U L - f6 F D o °�° 0 d o .E c n tn D 2 ° uN a d 2 a m 3 ,r,:. `O2U '6 001 O = E 0) aE ? L -2 0) d ' - 0O C C . 3 d a O O V4 (0 O 'O) ° O N y O O .,i; N U c a d U d U O .O ° U ° ` i .. w p m ° �O C° n. U E m Co yj o n f0 m 0. d N > _ {;„. N C 0 U U - c 3 c � '� goy = Cn r 0 d .4 m � ° m m � m o T O C fn d O) d d „:>,- U L ` W C 0 c O 'O L L .N m 0 ?� - C o..N 'O C E 'O m 'c U) c O T ,o., — ao. w 5 WELt d '- LO - Emm - o � CO 0 3 D "E N W O U L C = . O > - Q) N m to L a co . O C = -O O O m .0 O > O co C O O N L c N O L .m 0 U O o _ N d o = ”' L a L o a -� O C r 3 (30 N °, `o d . 0 ._ C C cr) WC `. O V (0 a) 'O 'O > N °_ j d Q C C .(q' E d O O C C N _ c U d d o .- d o -=O N m a) 0 °: m E = E ° E L.. 5 - ° -° m CO 'w a 7 V N1 L w o J E ,_a) .@ m O C LO 0 0) C N W. U E �r L U C C M a m O W (0 U) - 5 E :� O N ._ r0 -CD m E N = a-) O)- Co? 0 O o d E a O co O; 0 U L 0 O) O p = )n _ E m _ , - O O d O) ,o m T❑ L/1 m N C E N E C a N U =co E w C N d 'O m d E > f0 0) m C 0 2 - ai NC 'IQ2C = 0 mEC O_ UO '00 o Oi. O > dfTL/) ` LOC 0 C C m d .N UQ l0 to 0 O '0 = 0 0 CO Q c T C C C U N O d 1a T. d m d d C 0 Ol O CO p] Y d ::. '� MO E C Y C d d m O o N ..,t, N w U CO C m = '0 d C to .0 U U d C C CO .0 N U 0 E >..L. . ' O)d ° co N C O .N 'N O 'D O E d co C c, a 0 0 _ = U O. 2) V D Y o w O. 7 9 L .O ,.L.. .N O a)) E m m d 2 L > „,03 'O O L L O -p rn L = O N C N ` C H E U F- m i 3 2 u:. w d o >. CU a U `m °) .U,,. H ° 3 •E ° m F- 8 (T a = E F- E A & B 255 as U w m a c E • o o L• L m 0 V Z V V V N N N W a L a) iit d V 0 0 m > O L `O 2_ a as 00 w -• c as 5 > Q Q Q 0 0 L C C C C C w o O O O O O • C = 2 2 2 2 V O)... O)... U... O)« O)w. L w C U) C U) C m C U) C U) C 'C C C C .0 C E 'C d! 7 0 S O D O S O 5 0 I— > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0U O) 0 L 0 -.7. L 0___ f • O . ^ LL O U 0 0 Q Q N- C) m 71 O • N - L L O 0 a2 m m m m m R0 C C) -0 t O).j >,-o a) >. a) a) C C — C -0 C m m N CO O � ,� 3 0 � -o .� o 3 aa)) ac) N m a om a E E ca °c .x m >. m p N • o o) W c o co o v . 3 L c a as o o > > L a) O CO L . ' N 0 a .ea C O ` = 00 0 9 C m m a) m t a)) N co -5 O U ` — C C) 01 C 'O co L_a) c E o o > C N ._ m U C N D O a O Cr) o- o a) Emma) o 0 s c 0°-� c - E 6 a) In E cN mom2o cu �' � o > m CO °o 0 Z a) :0 N ... C C — a) U — -O C O O Ql C P = w 0 N L .0 C OU 'O i9 = O @ O .L.. 0I'p N _C -O D) • ED.7 O O '`" O co 2 m O -o O) c J O) C N m C -0 — O O) • O ma o_ c t .-0 -0 „O � 5 m E u ui c m . . c CO w o) m m C o c d ca a) ._ m m m o u E mO T o CE o c o '3 .5 u `mr S L D N C N C C O �C T m C O N a) D_ w t O Ol L L a) a3 O ... C O a) m 0 a) a) co 0 -C a 0 C 0 OI co • O m ? ° - D" o .0 E -m 3 m m 0 'o f tJ °- o m 0 'm — - - o° o E o `m o -o E m a) o -O CO m R C U .0 L C a) >..E C V C U E 0@ 'O C a) m in m - a N = m C a) C a� U .— C J G d CO co O_ C C C 0 A & B 256 a) 0 10 ' a ^r.. co H ;f • ;1 co xn v Z (NI ,ter ' N N 3/4,c' MI•gy. '-1.',.:., tea) '--:'4 ca aa- C w »,< > U `«t - 15 O C i+ L OW 0 t co 2 > • Y ; (o yu. c c w? c C co �= d i" a >Al w 0 o ma< 0 C0 o firhY CO CO ea _ m vb . > E > ` 6: 'CO Y;4„fi r r • k, co V C .—O a - c- O d '`"x U 2 o i Q m h'; co a• s:: Zi o ail O O cats CL 5 ;'3e IX w U t`,-.,''k m al P 0) O U a. a) O c 3 tto > d O a - '• C m d co to C O a) 6 m m C .I ma o)Uum°i c2 To a) E maniwu 5 § 2a) 2 E2 c 'vm 0 O o -o J jo >. U 'C C L O) (a 2) c -O 'O O (Na = c E m C C U to co 3 C C C c to c c E a) a) o ”Y o `p a a) = L Oil ai to a) .m a.- m CO -,.,CU m m m e� a,- a E m " m C 'O a C U y U C 0 ' O U -o +_u y N C m m.B • OO m (aW "0 - N N .� N CC '2N C ?. 'VOm _ U o r)o .c .o E o m to CL CO c o aa) z` E0 a02 -- c a -O C OU C o C m -o L 2 0 O ' .- N `. ''x_ N o) > U C m c c 3m � c � `- E 3co C N '� Xa) 3 _--Z ac cu .- x .D .E a) o -o ? x to o) rn� d m d O > O m to m a) C m 2) N U a' y o m c P,Dt' C 'j m a) .> Z = .c .o .o m mmu omm `m o - ct3 _ mmom ? E wo r ° cu> E 3 � ` owooam c C cmm 0::, C) dmE Q a w N a ° E N O 'p N .N. N m C o 0 .> m a c@ - m m 0) E o m m V ai 'o m> � 5 .5 0 0- o i.,>,.` � o U o u L E C O w 3 U _ C .p .- ? m _ c a) a) (0 N r"Ob. m r_J a) ••O .J a) _ = mm _ ELm � Um cmm (o c o 'octoto t>- (nEm _>' mc " • O o d . m a) c c a) > - m m .m a) m a am) 'Folk u) (Is 0 0••� d 51-11 °°" N ?. CO N E a) a) CO oC m m a) -00 m >. to:, O t� „O-_ (� E W O. - SmctO Da-o 03 a O 3 > > i. n #'8 - E ViaE- to E a` ao a) E ` E ">• - r .- o_ CC d m >S.':, d to (n to a to• A & 8257 o . V . _ 0 10 CL CO• E • o o = U 0 = v 2 N N N N N N CO To c a w c w y `o w > 0 w C o a N o u rF a 0 0 a> > N V) N N N C C C C C O CO CO CO CO = o a a o_ a w 0 o « o `o `o `o `o co F > a' a d' Cr Cr ) C 0 ` . = CN _.�+_d_ r 0 0 0 0 0 • O d --- U U U U O M LL m m m m m co co d C ao = _ _ O o CL LL• w co 0 0 CO 0 .c 8 O C) m,2) O 2O 'O L U L E f6 c a) N d O N 'C O a O • to O co m o -9 =03 O) `) c - U - m > _c m � m flux a ,_ 'n pz+'O -oao = m ° .c_ cmm ° 3o L � c -m ,n -o wE) Ea) co a ° c El 0 2 in a)15 E °) L W ° °- a) o co c a) co a) -° - m oca (n oo_ o -1E' co TTE our a) >,d (n c d p -p _ .:. a'C O a) c N O L .(n. > .0 a) a C o C u • Y °o a ° 2 axi o f .° o ° m C a) E 70 2 O .E > D ° L .o o O C _ ._ as L a_..,=o cn 'O N O w a x O a) O co m a!) ° ° a ° U o U (n E vO aN -' o -oo n m aa) 0 o o 0 c a° p)N > a) L L ° N O O C _m °' E v U o) a O co a) 'O N a) a U a) N_ C a C N L O O'"CO O` a1 m a N a) 'co a) N a a) co E E c a E L O .° � a E � o c E a) _ y u o c m ,o m� .(2 O C a) :C. O _ (n U N O ° 2 > OU o _c C C p O) a1 co . a) n °) E � m C , C0WC Cai ..:;: o C) L 0 .-° :;y4 t. sy, cE o o oh▪s...: • o U co• O V V "3 co Z N N { sj CO TO d t ; V: zi t_ a V a) of :1)4.. > O �x'',,-;ys ;44)-. Q O -§; a m ic .1 o u L .r N ,a; _ C C c a a `- O ? O r o o 9-4,, rn (U 3 3 ,lk`;t; E ;Ss 5 is R d a) T ry L co N T. L r `' o a)_ rt; r 7 t L C O , . ti to 2u m m AP C) t▪vt, L o f d ir t c L L a) ,- O O X ° CO m +N1r U w o C -o W T O T C ia c w n co O c C a) m O 63 0-„_,co to O C (o '_V C . N C -O _-' c _, co >coo a) a) O a) `'3t.' a) a) o Z C a) a) C U .�.. N (a m ° V) O c > r, 2) a) c .) C N w ¢'O m E N .S d a c O- m e j 'o O. 0 o N CV L.+ tr ;; @ -c .c o a�o o E c cacocoa0E = 5 °° Eoa0i = ° w t1FL av� rQ °3 a) 0oc `a (a € Q ° caci ° E N o a— cmwc0 WO )-4,),,a. 0)°) C > c -- m ° Eon rfl `o a _ in c o O W m -o xue S (o > O c o ' o o in- (900Ea) )7a a) N o)Z ° 0 � oa) Z . boo . E y = a ° wo o -c ° co» E —L' n_ o. c > EZaEE 'oEa) n�`�' cca � o_. - cc Etaa)cm N 0-.0 C N 2c 3 0 = O-.°)) ? o a) j .o ..�.. teal O (o co ] 0 C U c N E � � � ° � aca�c � .c oc E mo.) 1)ti: cam ° °1 m ° vX ° E a O a N O N C o m Oa) o -tea w a) W .l n ° 4fi a7 .E co c C 'f0 0 .> '° aa o a) o c' mco) oEN °° E m ° ' �a ° = m ' '- 0 . Eac 3 E ° ° 0om Z 'O .m m e _° u� a c cl 0) o) c m co T N a) -+ v ° c o E m a oc) co U L a C a 4 Cl) in g a (a m o > o °-� > m, „ c o o N S a a E 0 a W C C w N O y C U o .c N N > m 00 n 00 f 0 -a -N a) C N p a O 0 > 6 i oZ"u0co SoEo ° > eEo E ,: u) m ° .No eto -° rn ° 3 ma oVE72a .cooa, ° ooEo m = oo t : NmUOOO omc o N a) c o)_c" E .c E O c N = CA— m p -Z N a a .` 2 - c c CI m O . l9 .� L 2 To a c , c w30H 76 I) erEW cOec c '' iso " --, p a o o -c `m L L N (a c a) a) O a) _ o w C ° w ° '.0 o ::::,"4:i' ° �" U '0 o '- c co 'J • 0 CO N o � 2 - `o m ` O o o c f0 0 ` E -2 c co ` !;1L o u a2) 3 o aa', a ° °` E c 3 c E O ._ .a W N ° N CO p CO = C Lc c r i, ` w_ -a L O y o) of _ as C C O. O (o N , U c Z 0 o 'a Y U C y 2O C C i yv `o_ c E _ °) N N V N 'O 2 C E 0 3 a m 0 W o o L a._ ca o a) r 5 o CO:. ' o J L �c _ a7 0 S N E 2 E _ aw0 -0 -- o_ c - - a` m3oUmo _ mU ,z, dovvmE m `o � uDaE A & B 259 d p C E > 8 m • a) v E • O O u "3▪ W v U Y 0 r 0 0 C C i▪' C m O c o co 0 N Z V' V V ii,oLt5:`'. o m U O ' -O : • it o A C i ' v v O o a N .E1x 120 U U s ¢ U N 3 C aC` o 0 0 > v c -�p. t t = c s o a) C ± t r s a 'o oo 't oct c 3 .2 a) c5 0 CO^` [v r) a l() c0 r C As. w 'o O O 'M' c ea a A w - 0 p s: a .0 `._ `w v (u 0 $- b `2 > Q Q Q F_ + ° in Mo 3C Q a) C ' C C c `'p9 w O O O o ,,nag E p y m, E @ U U U V" O N v E CD n m 2 0) 2 �' a E w . C N ` N o CI E � � «,d v a o D CO - CO °�A N N U w , 0 Q U N k�O @s N a) ° a T « an cci , OO ( v C :;-`41.,;: CV r- ❑• C C o li U 0 0 ) c 6 v r E 'o ° o d = C a) c U ALL UN 5 ,• ` Z o . o E m m C.ix w am n -.vs if W H m ° ip :6.04 :a) o U•L.. T m L_ O C �C n, m@ N > - > 0 f°)/) L to N p .0 m C- tN/1 1`.Cs. a H O O to " - ru Ecco5005 -- ta LLtaa (a :p"a) - O m N ou - oc O_ (n 0 L to C (o w C c O N O N N ° 3 OJ U ❑ W°' pm � � � 3ovc ' 2' mmm a°'i aYi � w .° a� o) o .x 0 -O X O E 0 3 °' °= 2 > 0 .p 0 o 0. C c �.fir;:a) 3c (va) a € > -- ° m � (a (uo � 3c (nc ° 'oc `1] 0 C O p 0 0 a) -O U 'O (a 0 U C > C N ° FE;U CO C U O. ❑ L "O al (U c ` O 0 N X -O to �;:'rt;co ca c = °_ E6u) Oaa)) E0) Nt 0oc .. o � ° u00 z O E ° L C L O N O K E N N CO O j L C U L = .ti: °o _ o E _ y m P. Y cd E y E 2 cc_' c° a 01 m `n 4- c°i m td to 0 O. c o_ 0 a) 3 ,g- `° ci3 N o..-• C ._ 0 5 to .c m '5 C - .E L ca f 2 D -' o O Om >. > O to .t6 a) O fn N N 'V ,m (a O T.` T.L.. C O u N u W tU r o_ E0 >1" - d c c° co y N c N ° o) m y c E c° c° m �'-mo ° = aa) p V` ❑ w v L 'O '50 (5o02 = 00 -5 0 0 0 (a N to > > -O c v v O N C N C 0 U (° :5 - 0 coot m -0 ca o o c .0) O L to 0 ..i• N a o o) c Z = 0) m o (T C N t9 tT NO .5 (A oC O t O _cm ... '- O E 0 0 N ` �u=i ¢ -°p `o, 'y' a) 0 O e E - co -0 E ° 'C m O 7) Q) to O --° N ` L o o .0 4=CZ. -a0j `o a`ni f a c O V m (Z >, L .0 o LO. .S 0 .(0 o > -0 0 E >.Q O 0 U C to n ,1& N 1O 'o o Ip .w' N Q o) 'O 0) U (a _ C w ° m a'0 x c 'N ` -0 N Q ".dt ❑ V O (6 c v O O j T O fa O T.- 0 C C (9 to > O T a) O 0 c _ 7 co ip.°% > 2 8 '5 '° E C C O o 72 C a N E c L -.so = -= O L Q ea 05 -20 -O U �. N -O Y Gi '= 'p c 5@ `O • c C o co co L O N O > O p O N g V) .".T' 00 s � L O .. m 0 co ca U et E c .g, rn U w om ` oo ` aNa ° 05- 0- -o 'oP_ tno corn_ 3E 0cm r c• 0 a W -_°'° (2 N d to `O o N O u) o- 2 (0 5 c N N C ca a O N 2 m U , w U m D "5 ) N 0 w C 0 C O C -°C O > a°)) -°)O a) _ i-0 m -O C - _ N g O ._ "- a v -8.7, 0 Sy- ❑ Q. U m tL it r O p U ry O m I- o 0 0 0 L O m m - m t0 o o N m C i O °) N >' 'ids, ❑ ❑ W U O U 5 _ U L .E C U N '- ❑ C O .0 W L NL w .c U) 2 ,c C c .c co O_ U .L.. (n (V 'Co U tL U 0a a_ LL A & B 260 ,a� ttw City of Rancho Cucamonga y„i'? MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Development Review DRC2011-01094D and Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094 Public Review Period Closes: July 25, 2012 Project Name: Project Applicant: Bill Reseigh, HMR Architects, AIA Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Professional (OP) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan near the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street -APN: 1100-031-07. Project Description: A request to construct and operate a funeral home (that will not include a crematory, a cemetery, nor conduct embalming) with a floor area of 6,911 square feet and a porto cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel of 2.32 acres (note: final area of the parcel subject to outcome of Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • July 25. 2012 Date of Determination Adopted By A & B261 • RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094,A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A FUNERAL HOME (THAT WILL NOT INCLUDE A CREMATORY, A CEMETERY, NOR CONDUCT EMBALMING) WITH A FLOOR AREA OF 6,911 SQUARE FEET AND A PORTE-COCHERE OF 1,371 SQUARE FEET ON A VACANT PARCEL OF 2.32 ACRES ! • • • • ! - SUBLLA1t601)WITHIN THE ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL (OP) DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CANDLEWOOD STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1100-031-07. A. Recitals. 1. HMR Architects, on behalf of SCI Funeral Services, Inc., filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." • 2. On the 25th day of July 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on July 25, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant, irregularly-shaped parcel located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street; and b. The parcel is approximately 164,200 square feet(3.77 acres) in area. As part of the proposal, the applicant has submitted a Lot Line Adjustment(Related file: Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). This adjustment will change the alignment of the property line. Following the adjustment the rectangular parcel will have an area of approximately 101,000 square feet (2.32 • acres)with overall dimensions of approximately 350 feet(east to west) by approximately 307 feet (north to south); and A& B262 RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094,A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A FUNERAL HOME WITH A FLOOR AREA OF 6,911 SQUARE FEET AND A PORTE-COCHERE OF 1,371 SQUARE FEET ON A VACANT PARCEL OF2.32ACRES •• o _• • e - - • - _ • • - - '' ' e - • - - •• , - _ - • -- WITHIN THE ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL (OP) DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CANDLEWOOD STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 1100-031-07. A. Recitals. 1. HMR Architects, on behalf of SCI Funeral Services, Inc., filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of July 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on July 25, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant, irregularly-shaped parcel located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street; and b. The parcel is approximately 164,200 square feet (3.77 acres) in area. As part of the proposal, the applicant has submitted a Lot Line Adjustment (Related file: Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). This adjustment will change the alignment of the property line. Following the adjustment the rectangular parcel will have an area of approximately 101,000 square feet (2.32 acres) with overall dimensions of approximately 350 feet (east to west) by approximately 307 feet (north to south); and • c. To the west across Etiwanda Avenue and north across Candlewood Street of the project site, are single-family residences. To the east is the 1-15 Freeway. To the south of the A & B 262 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 2 • project site are two, small buildings—a post office and an office,while immediately to the northwest of the project site is the historic Cour House; and d. Neither the office buildings, nor the Cour House identified above are part of this project; and e. The zoning of all of the properties located southeast of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street, including the project site, is Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM)Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties to the west is Mixed Use(MU)District, Victoria Planned Community; and f. -The proposal is to construct and operate a one-story funeral home of 6,911 square feet. Operations will be limited to the arrangement of services, wakes/visitations, and funerals for the deceased and their families. Pre-funeral services, such as the preparation of the deceased, embalming, and body dressing,and/or post-funeral services,such as cremation and/or burials, are not proposed; and g. The proposed hours of operation are between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Monday through Friday)and between 10:00 a.m.to 4:00 p.m. (Saturday and Sunday). Evening visitations, if requested, will be conducted between 6:30 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Funeral services and associated activities are anticipated to occur a maximum of three(3)times per week. The duration of a funeral service will vary; and h. The proposed funeral home will have up to four(4) employees; and • i. After the funeral service, if the family of the deceased chooses to do so, there will be an escorted funeral procession to the cemetery. According to a traffic impact analysis prepared by Albert Wilson&Associates on May 11,2012,the typical duration time for an escorted procession to pass through a particular point is approximately 3 minutes and 44 seconds, or four(4) seconds per vehicle,and is based on the assumption that there would be an average of three(3)persons per vehicle. As the funeral home's seating capacity of 168 persons,this equates to fifty-six(56)vehicles (168/3 = 56); and j. If there is no funeral procession, then the use of the public streets will occur in a normal manner; and k. This application is in conjunction with Development Review DRC2011-01094D;and I. The parking calculation for the funeral home is one (1)parking stall per 25 square feet of assembly room,e.g. chapel, or floor area per Section 17.12.040(B)(1)(l)of the Development Code. With a chapel of 1,872 square feet, 75 parking stalls are required for the funeral home, and 75 parking stalls have been provided. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. • The proposed project is a one-story funeral home of 6,911 square feet with a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is Office; and A & B263 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 3 b. That the proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code, the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in the site is located. The proposed project is a one-story funeral home of 6,911 square feet with a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet. The zoning of all of the properties located southeast of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street, including the project site, is Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties tip the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties to the west is Mixed Use (MU) District, Victoria Planned Community; and c. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The project will comply with the requirements for site development such as building;parking, and landscape setbacks; maximum building height; parking; landscaping; and access. The project will comply with the requirements for design including incorporating architecture that is compatible and consistent with the architecture of the surrounding neighborhood and the use of materials, finish, trim, and colors of high quality and appeal; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within,the community where it is located, and the expectations of the community. The proposed funeral home will not include a crematorium, which could affect air quality by emitting • particulate matter or odors. The building will incorporate design elements that will be consistent with the architecture of the homes in the neighborhood. Lighting will be required to comply with the City's standards for overall height and luminosity. There will not be a cemetery on-site that could cause visual distress. The project site does not contain biologically sensitive habitat, nor will any existing trees be removed. Noise and vibrations are not typical characteristics of funeral homes. Lastly, traffic generated by this project is within the expected capacity of the surrounding streets. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; • and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the A & B264 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094 — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 4 • Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program_for.the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The Custodian of Records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction and operation of a funeral home of 6,911 square feet with a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet on a • vacant parcel within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Professional (OP) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located near the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street - APN: 1100-031-07. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) Approval of this request does not include pre-funeral services,such as the preparation of the deceased such as embalming and body dressing, and/or post-funeral services, such as cremation and/or burials. These activities are prohibited. 4) The hours of operation shall be between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Monday through Friday) and between 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (Saturday and Sunday). Evening visitations shall end no later than 8:00 p.m. 5) The funeral home shall operate in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code. If the operation of the funeral home causes adverse effects upon the adjacent land uses, then the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible revocation of the • • Conditional Use Permit. A & B265 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 5 6) Any modification or intensification of the use including: a change in the operating hours;the addition of any activities not specifically approved with this Conditional Use Permit;interior modifications such as, but not limited to, an expansion of the floor area of the building, revisions to the floor plan, increase in the number of seats within the chapel; exterior modifications such as, but not limited to, expansion of the parking lot, revisions to the exterior of the building, installation of roof-mounted equipment or projections; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. 7) Easements shall be provided to the owner(s)of the adjoining parcels to the northwest and south (APN: 1100-031-06 and 1100-041-01) to allow joint access to Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street via the proposed driveways and drive aisles of the project site. Documents for this easement shall be submitted for review by the City and the easement recorded with the County of San Bernardino (and other agencies/entities as may be required)prior to the issuance of Grading and Building Permits. 8) A minimum of 75 parking stalls shall be provided. • 9) The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. The maximum height of light standards, including the base,measured from the finished surface is 15 feet. 10) The Etiwanda Avenue stone curbing shall be restored or reconstructed in conformance with adopted City standards acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Photographic documentation of the condition of the curbing shall be provided prior to issuance of Construction Permits per Section 5.25.304 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 11) Outdoor storage of operating equipment,supplies, materials, and trash is prohibited. 12) All signs shall comply with the City's Sign Ordinance and Section 5.25.406 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 13) All Conditions of Approval for Development Review DRC2011-01094D shall apply. Engineering Department • 1) Install public improvements on Etiwanda Avenue frontage (one-half street) per City "Secondary Arterial" standards and the Etiwanda Specific Plan (Fig. 5-23); including pavement to centerline of street, A & B266 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 6 • cobble curb and gutter, 5-foot wide property line adjacent sidewalk, drive approaches, streetlights and street trees as follows and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Extend improvements across the adjacent north property - APN: 1100-031-06 and join with Candlewood Street improvements. a) Provide 9500 Lumen HPSV street lights in accordance with City street lighting standards. b) Install Commercial Drive Approaches with a minimum width of 35 feet in accordance with City Standard Plan No. 101, Type-C. c) Provide access easement for adjacent south property fronting Etiwanda to allow them adequate access to Etiwanda Avenue through the south drive approach. d) Install cobble curb with a 10-inch curb face. e) Provide signing, striping, and protect existing R26 "No Parking" signs or replace. f) Provide a Class II Bike Lane on Etiwanda Avenue. g) Install street trees along the project frontages per the attached • "Street Tree Requirements Form". Revise the existing improvement plans as needed. 2) Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the proposed lot line adjustment is to be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. 3) Dedicate additional right-of-way on Etiwanda Avenue to achieve a total of 50 feet measured from centerline of street (APN: 1100-031-07). Dedication shall extend north across APN: 1100-031-06 to Candlewood Street. 4) Provide shared access 26-foot driveway on the south property line (Etiwanda) with the adjacent south parcel. A 26-foot easement for a joint use driveway and shall be provided prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. 5) Dedicate additional right-of-way on Candlewood Street to achieve a total of 30 feet measured from the centerline of the street. Dedication to extend across APN: 1100-031-06 to and joining with the corner cutoff with Etiwanda Avenue. Vacate any excess right-of-way across APN: 1100-031-01 as well. 6) If garage on APN: 1100-031-06 is removed by others prior to Building Permit issuance, complete the installation of sidewalk on Candlewood • Street prior to a Building Permit issuance. A & B267 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 7 7) Provide an easement to accept cross-lot drainage from the NAP parcel (APN: 1100-031-06). 8) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical)on the project side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be under-grounded along the entire project frontage,extending to the first pole off-site (north and south), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy,whichever occurs first. All services crossing Etiwanda Avenue shall be under-grounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for under-grounding from future development(redevelopment)as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 9) Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted away from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted • to the Engineering Department when the first Building Permit • application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. Building and Safety Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16(Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit for any underground Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Best Management Practices (BMPs). 2) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 3) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 4) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall provide to • Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The A & B 268 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 8 • Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 5) The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for any proposed underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 6) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 7) A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. 8) All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way(Etiwanda Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. Prior to issuance of a Wall Permit 1) On engineered bio-retention basin retaining walls along the property • boundary, the structural calculations for the wall shall.assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). In addition,the wall calculations and design shall include hydrostatic forces and shall be sealed so as to be "water tight." 2) A copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. Water Quality Management Plan 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 2) The Water Quality Management Plan prepared by an unknown entity dated January 11, 2012, has been reviewed and deemed"Incomplete" dated January 24, 2012. The following corrections are required prior to the final approval of the WQMP: Page Section Item Cover The engineer of record must wet sign and seal the document. • A-4 1.2 Please include the " DRC " number in this section. A & B 269 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 9 Page Section Item 1.4 Please include the Santa Ana River Reach 3 (SAR3) which contains bacteria and pathogens in this section. A-8 2.2 In the table item 1.A and 1.0 is correct. Item 1.B should be marked "no", or as an option you may complete the table starting on page A-10 of the document. A-13 3.1.1 A sentence reads "Ultimately, a portion of that easterly strip might be constructed as a parking lot." Please address if the proposed BMPs will still work with the additional impervious area and will the 27 percent landscaping coverage remain or will the landscaping coverage be reduced. A-13 3.1.1 A sentence reads"The swale will slow down the runoff and will infiltrate most of the low flow into its sand-mix section." Please provide a detail of this swale. It is our understanding that this WQMP document will move forward of the grading plan. Therefore details of all BMPs are required to allow for future inspections by the City and for review during the permitting process to determine if the proposed precise grading plan meets the requirements of this WQMP document. A-14 3.1.1 Two sentences read"The area reserved . . . parking stalls in the future." Please address how the additional impervious pavement will affect the Water Quality Management Plan requirements and the proposed BMP • devices. A-16 3.1.2 A sentence reads "All areas of the side including . . ." A side of what? Please define a "side." A-17 3.1.2 A sentence reads "Only if necessary will a portion of the landscaped area be converted to parking stalls." Please address how the additional impervious pavement will affect the Water Quality Management Plan requirements and the proposed BMP devices. 3.2 We thank you providing a copy of the educational materials in this WQMP document. However we have some questions regarding the educational materials. Please address the following items: 0 SD-32 it appears that the requirements for a roof over the trash storage area and not placing storm drains within the immediate vicinity of the trash storage area have not been met on the Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan; 0 SD-33 why is this included? In the WQMP document you state that vehicle washing is prohibited; 0 TC-31 is a vegetated buffer strip proposed? We did not see a vegetated buffer strip references in the WQMP document; 0 TC-32, one of the limitations are slopes not greater than 20%, the proposed bio-retention basin does not meet this requirement; • A & B 270 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 10 • Page Section Item 0 "Fresh concrete and mortar application" -will this project have on-going construction which should be included within the post- construction WQMP document? Would this educational material be better suited to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan?; 0 "Excavation and Grading" - will this project have on-going construction which should be included within the post- construction WQMP document? Would this educational material be better suited to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan?; 0 "Home repair and modeling" - will this project have on-going construction which should be included within the post- construction WQMP document?Would this educational material be better suited to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan?; 0 "Painting" - will this project have on-going construction which should be included within the post-construction WQMP document? Would this educational material be better suited to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan?; 0 "Roadwork and Paving" - will this project have on-going • construction which should be included within the post- construction WQMP document?Would this educational material be better suited to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan?; 0 Why is the "Low Impact Development Manual" included in the educational materials? How will this benefit the ro e P P rtY manager of the project? This document appears to be written for a designer or engineer for the preparation of the site 9 9 P P improvement plans. A-24 3.3 A paragraph reads "by separating the low flows and high flows . . . to avoid any co-mingling of the treated and untreated runoff." Please check your design, it appears that two catch basins are intercepting low flows causing a co-mingling of the flows. A-25 3.3 In Table 3-3 the only Pollutant of Concern which is treated is`Bacteria and Viruses." Please explain why the other expected and potential Pollutants of Concerns are not treated. A-26 3.4 The WQMP document describes a vegetated swale and includes educational materials for a vegetated swale, yet Table 3.4 does not include a vegetated swale. Please clarify this issue. A-27 4.1.1 0 Should a vegetated swale be included here? 0 A sentence reads "Refer to . . . TC-32 . . " Yet the bio-retention • basin does not meet the stated requirements. Please address this issue. A & B271 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 11 Page Section Item A-27 4.1.2 Please include the title of the contact person. This will allow City staff to contact the appropriate individual in the future. A-28 5.1 Please include the title of the contact person. This will allow City staff to contact the appropriate individual in the future. A-29 6 The City of Rancho Cucamonga"Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan Agreement";the following items may be added to the agreement: • File — please add the civil engineer of record's file number here • Prepared By — please add the engineering company here which prepared this document • Checked By—please add the initials of the engineer which prepared this document • Assessor's Parcel Number— please add the APN here A-31 Exhibit A Is this legal description before or after the lot line adjustment? If it is before the lot line adjustment, please include a proper legal description for the property which is affected for the recorder's office. • Please provide a full size (24" x 36") WQMP BMP exhibit within the document In addition the letter size exhibit is missing details of the BMPS and the inspection and maintenance schedule. Please understand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is required to inspect these BMPS on a biennial basis. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. • 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. A & 8 272 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 12 • 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds • exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle • services. 12) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. A & B273 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 13 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods(i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 17) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 19) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees • shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 20) All residential and commercial structures shall be required 'to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 21) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 22) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e.fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. A & B274 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 14 • • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the areas archaeological heritage. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide • specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow 9 P 9 the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository(i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils • 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions, A & 8 2 7 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094 — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 15 in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 ore replanted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,() emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PKo emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall ` be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PKo emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil- stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as • possible. • 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-or diesel-powered engines where feasible 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. • 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation A & B276 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 16 • • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available • and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient Y 9 fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets,dual flush toilets, and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval,Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)specifically identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading • Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This A & B277 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 17 Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs)to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the • City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. A & B 278 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 18 • Noise 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening,closing, or other handling of boxes,crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the • Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday ora national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips(counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: •Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman A & B 279 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 DRC2011-01094— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 19 ATTEST: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Secretary I, Jeffrey A. Bloom, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of July 2012, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • A & B280 tomp it COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT t� , DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2011-01094 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CANDLEWOOD STREET — LOCATION: APN: 1100-031-07. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date ii1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / /_ agents, officers,or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action..The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the-signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 12-34, Standard _/ / Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use _/_/_ has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include /_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. • 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions /_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 1 A & B281 Project No.DRC2011-01094 Compietion Date 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety • Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/ /_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all /_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan,including a photometric diagram,shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style,illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/ /_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, /_/_ including proper illumination. - 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _!_/_• owner,homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. Where rock cobble is used,it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured / /_ products. D. Shopping Centers 1. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the / /_ Planning Director: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of(the shopping center/the project). / /_ b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to _/_/_ include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. _/_/_ d. Roll-up doors. _/_/_ e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. / /_ f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. / /_ g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed _/ /_ to be hidden from view. • 2 A & B 282 • • Project No. DRC2011-01094 Completion Date 2. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. / / • 3, The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and _/ /_ debris remain for more than 24 hours. 4. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking"and for"employee parking only." _/_/_ 5. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an • /_/_ exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading-No person shall cause the loading,unloading,opening,closing,or _/_/_ other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m.and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/ /_ projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening-shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be • painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main / / building colors. --- F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts _/ /_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / /_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, / / and exits shall be striped per City standards. --- 4. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/ /_ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. • 5. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more / /_ parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. • 3 A & B 283 Project No.DRC2011-01094 Completion Date G. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/ /_• residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces,whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the • required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 2. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for _/_/_ commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. H. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in / /_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in _/_/_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110,and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within /_/_• commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees -24-inch box or larger. 4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls. 5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one / /_ tree per 30 linear feet of building. 6. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Etiwanda Avenue. 7. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the / /_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the _/ /_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water !_/_ efficient landscaping as defined in Ordinance 823 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code I. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of /_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of$557 prior to the issuance of building permits,guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain • 4 A & B284 • Project No. DRC2011-01094 Completion Date consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. J. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: / / a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached)including the size of the main switch, number and size • of service entrance conductors, pariel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans,including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2011-01094 and DRC2011-01094D) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. . 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to / /_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / / 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department. L. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / /_ marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2011-01094 and DRC2011-01094D). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. • 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or / /_ major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may 5 A & B 285 Project No. DRC2011-01094 Completion Date include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to • the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map /_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/ /_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter). M. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area,fire-resistiveness, building energy efficient standards and accessibility to public buildings. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ . 3. Provide draft stops in attics. /_/_ 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. / /_ 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. / /_ 6. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. / /_ N. Grading • 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading /,/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. • 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to • _/_/_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/ /_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, / /_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. 0. Building and Safety Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, _/_/_ City Grading Standards,and accepted grading practices.The Grading and Drainage Plan(s)shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. • 6 A & B 286 Project No.DRC2011-01094 Completion Date 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform / /_ such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans • shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at _/ /_ the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be / /_ completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects _/ /_ and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared,stamped,and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a / /_ dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for / /_ review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be _/ /_ prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior / /_ to the issuance of a grading permit. • 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance _/ /_ letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property / /_ owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 12. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way _/ /_ and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where /_/_ possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot off-set from the public right-of-way or adjacent private property. _/ /_ 15. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted _/ / California Plumbing Code. 16. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be _/ /_ constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 17. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under /_/_ parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. • • • 7 A & B 287 • Project No.DRC2011-01094 Completion Date 18. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond / /- project boundary. 19. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined —/ /_ • exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 20. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building —/—/ Code. 21. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho / /_ Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 22. Grading Inspections: / / a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre- grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative,the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1. The bottom of the over-excavation 2. Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; 3. At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad • Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; 4. The rough grading certificates.and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 23. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan(WQMP)best management practices(BMP) devices. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, —/_/ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas,street trees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from /—/ street centerline): 50 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue _/ / 30 total feet on Candlewood Street / / — • B • A & 8288 Project No. DRC2D11-01094 Completion Date 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / / • 4. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint _/ /_ maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 5. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or _/ / noted on the final map. -- • Q. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos,landscaped /_/_ areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source _/ /_ of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except:that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / / • Street Name Curb& AC. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Etiwanda Avenue X X X X X X n/a n/a X Candlewood n/a n/a X(e) X n/a X n/a n/a n/a Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights _/ /_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil • Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/ / construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing,street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and _/ / interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City / /_ • Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. 9 A & B289 Project No. DRC2011-01094 Completion Date e. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded • upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be /_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / /_ accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed / /_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Candlewood Street Eucalyptus sideroxylon Red Ironbark Eucalyptus 8' 30' 15 gal 5 (subject to change) Etiwanda Avenue Eucalyptus sideroxylon Red Ironbark Eucaluptus 8' 30' 15 gal 5 Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil • amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. R. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. S. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the /_/_ property from adjacent areas. 2. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/ /_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. • 10 A & B 290 • Project No. DRC2011-01094 Completion Date T. Utilities • 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas, /_/ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. U. General Requirements and Approvals 1. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of /_/_ building permits, whichever occurs first. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / /- new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/ /_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to • the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 4. Provide copy of final Water Quality Management Plan with submittal of grading plans to Building and Safety. QWMP and grading plans are subject to review by the Building Official. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: V. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. / /_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,with / / direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / / W. Security Hardware • 1. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within /_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. /_/ • 11 A & B291 Project No. DRC2011-01094 Completion Date X. Windows 1. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede / /_• entry to burglars. Y. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / / visibility. --- Z. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and / /_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: (909)941-1488. / /_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • • 12 A & B 292 �c� ` '"gym Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services • FIRE STANDARD CONDITIONS December 19, 2011 Funeral Home HMR Architects SEC Etiwanda & Candlewood DRC2011-01094 & 1094D THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building & Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web citvofrc.us. The Fire Entitlement Fee is to be collected at Plan Check. Fee payment must be processed at the Building and Safety Services Department. The case tag will be removed from the parcel by the public service technician upon payment of fees. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply • a. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10 FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. • Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. A & B 293 FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems . Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the2007 California Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed • FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The 201oCalifornia Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard 9-3, Ordinance FD46 and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system fire may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard 5-1. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. • 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. • c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. • 2 A & B294 b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. • 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard, The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. .Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. • g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 6. Roof Access: must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 5-6. There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all • 3 A & B 295 commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. • b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits • Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents Repair Garages Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2010 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD50and other implemented and/or adopted standards. • 4 • A & B 296 • FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. • FCS-14 Map Recordation 1. RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant — Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire ' protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. • Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and • witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of 5 A & B297 • the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at • least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: • 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction • Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire • Construction Services. 6 A & B 298 9. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. • 10. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 11. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 13. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 ''/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • • • 7 A & B 299 • RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D, A REVIEW OF A PROPOSED FUNERAL HOME(THAT WILL NOT INCLUDE A CREMATORY,A CEMETARY, NOR CONDUCT EMBALMING)WITH A FLOOR AREA OF 6,911 SQUARE FEET AND A PORTE-COCHERE OF 1,371 SQUARE FEET ON A VACANT PARCEL OF 2.32 ACRES (NOTE: FINAL AREA OF THE PARCEL SUBJECT TO OUTCOME OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SUBLLA#691) WITHIN THE ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL (OP) DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CANDLEWOOD STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1100-031-07. A. Recitals. 1. HMR Architects, on behalf of SCI Funeral Services, Inc., filed an application for the issuance of Development Review DRC2011-01094D, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." • 2. On the 25th day of July 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on July 25, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant, irregularly-shaped parcel located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street; and b. The parcel is approximately 164,200 square feet(3.77 acres) in area. As part of the proposal the applicant has submitted a Lot Line Adjustment(Related file: Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). This adjustment will change the alignment of the property line. Following the adjustment the rectangular parcel will have an area of approximately 101,000 square feet • (2.32acres) with overall dimensions of approximately 350 feet (east to west) by approximately 307 feet(north to south); and A& B 300 RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D, A REVIEW OF A PROPOSED FUNERAL HOME WITH A FLOOR AREA OF 6,911 SQUARE FEET AND A PORTE- COCHERE OF 1,371 SQUARE FEET ON A VACANT PARCEL OF 2.32 ACRES (, . - :- - - : :. E • e _ WITHIN THE ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL (OP) DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CANDLEWOOD STREET;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1100- 031-07. A. Recitals. 1. HMR Architects, on behalf of SCI Funeral Services, Inc., filed an application for the issuance of Development Review DRC2011-01094D, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of July 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on July 25, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant, irregularly-shaped parcel located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street; and b. The parcel is approximately 164,200 square feet (3.77 acres) in area. As part of the proposal the applicant has submitted a Lot Line Adjustment (Related file: Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). This adjustment will change the alignment of the property line. Following the adjustment the rectangular parcel will have an area of approximately 101,000 square feet (2.32acres) with overall dimensions of approximately 350 feet (east to west) by approximately 307 feet (north to south); and • c. To the west across Etiwanda Avenue and north, across Candlewood Street of the project, site are single-family residences. To the east is the 1-15 Freeway. To the south of the A & B 300 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 2 • project site are two, small buildings—a post office and an office—while immediately to the northwest of the project site is the historic Cour House; and d. Neither the office buildings nor the Cour House identified above are part of this project; and e. The zoning of all of the properties located southeast of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street, including the project site, is Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties to the west is Mixed Use (MU) District, Victoria Planned Community; and f. The proposal is to construct and operate a one-story funeral home of 6,911 square feet. The funeral home will be limited to the arrangement of services, wakes/visitations, and funerals for the deceased and their families. Rooms,facilities,and/or equipment for the purpose of cremations, embalming, and/or burials (cemeteries) are not proposed consistent as pre-funeral services, such as the preparation of the deceased such as embalming and body dressing, and/or post-funeral services, such as cremation and/or burials, are not proposed; and g. This application is in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094;and h. The parking calculation for the funeral home is one(1)parking stall per 25 square feet of assembly room, e.g.chapel,or floor area per Section 17.12.040(B)(1)(l)of the Development Code. With a chapel of 1,872 square feet, 75 parking stalls are required for the funeral home and • 75 parking stalls have been provided. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The proposed project is a one-story funeral home of 6,911 square feet with a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is Office; and b. That the proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code, the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in the site is located. The proposed project is a one-story funeral home of 6,911 square feet with a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet. The zoning of all of the properties located southeast of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street, including the project site, is Office Professional (OP) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The zoning of the properties to the west is Mixed Use (MU) District, Victoria Planned Community; and c. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The project will comply with the requirements for site development such as building, parking,and landscape setbacks; maximum building height; parking; landscaping; and access. The project will comply with the requirements for design including incorporating architecture that is compatible and consistent with the architecture of the surrounding neighborhood and the use of materials, finish, trim, and colors of high quality and • appeal; and A & B301 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 3 • d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant;the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the community where it is located, and the expectations of the community. The proposed funeral home will not include a crematorium that could affect air quality by emitting particulate matter or odors. The building will incorporate design elements that will be consistent with the architecture of the homes in the neighborhood. Lighting will be required to comply with the City's standards for overall height and luminosity. There will not be a cemetery on-site which could cause visual distress. The project site does not contain biologically sensitive habitat nor will any existing trees be removed. Noise and vibrations are not typical characteristics of funeral homes. Lastly, traffic generated by this project is within the expected capacity of the surrounding streets. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would • have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The Custodian of Records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, • California 91730, telephone (909)477-2750. A & B302 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 4 • 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a funeral home of 6,911 square feet with a porte-cochere of 1,371 square feet on a vacant parcel within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District in the Office Professional (OP) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located near the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street-APN: 1100-031-07. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan,State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) Approval of this request does not include the construction of facilities for, and/or the installation of, any equipment for the purpose of cremations, embalming, and/or burials (cemeteries). These activities are prohibited. 4) The funeral home shall operate in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code. If the operation of the funeral home causes adverse effects upon the adjacent land uses, • then the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 5) Any modification to the building and/or site including: interior modifications such as, but not limited to, an expansion of the floor area of the building, revisions to the floor plan, increase in the number of seats within the chapel; exterior modifications such as, but not limited to,expansion of the parking lot, revisions to the exterior of the building, installation of roof-mounted equipment or projections; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Development Review,shall require the review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. 6) Easements shall be provided to the owner(s)of the adjoining parcels to the northwest and south (APN's: 1100-031-06 and 1100-041-01) to allow joint access to Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street via the proposed driveways and drive aisles of the project site. Documents for this easement shall be submitted for review by the City and the easement recorded with the County of San Bernardino (and other agencies/entities as may be required) prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. • 7) A minimum of 75 parking stalls shall be provided. A & B303 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 5 8) The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. The maximum height of light standards, including the base,measured from the finished surface is 15'feet. 9) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevation of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building. 10) The maximum height of any wall or fence in this development district is 6 feet. Chain link fencing is not permitted; perimeter walls/fences shall be constructed of wrought iron, concrete block,tilt-up concrete panels, or equivalent as approved by the Planning Director. 11) Decorative paving shall be provided at all vehicle entrances to the site, behind the public right-of-way. The decoratively paved area shall have a minimum depth of 25 feet and a width equal to that of the driveways. 12) The decorative trim around the windows and doors shall be constructed of real wood and not foam. 13) The river rock veneer shall be constructed of real river rock as opposed • to a synthetic or man-made veneer. 14) The trash enclosure shall be constructed per City standard and shall incorporate some of the materials used on the building including real river rock veneer. 15) All doors shall match the color of the adjacent wall. 16) Landscaping provided shall be consistent with the standards described in Section 5.23.310 and Figure 5-26 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Detailed Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted,at the time of plan check, to the Planning Department for review and approval. The Detailed Landscape and Irrigation Plans must be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 17) All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened bya minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. 18) The Double-Detector Check (DDC) and Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be screened with a 4-foot high decorative block wall, subject to the review and approval by the Planning Department and • Fire Construction Services. A & B304 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 6 • 19) Stone walls or bermed landscaping of 36-inches in height shall be incorporated along Candlewood Street frontage to screen the parking lot. 20) All landscaping shall be installed prior to release for occupancy. 21) The Etiwanda Avenue stone curbing shall be restored or reconstructed in conformance with adopted City standards acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Photographic documentation of the condition of the curbing shall be provided prior to issuance of Construction Permits per Section 5.25.304 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 22) Any revisions to the Grading Plan may require review and approval by the Grading Review Committee. Similarly, any revisions in the architecture of the building may require review and approval by the Design Review Committee. 23) All signs shall comply with the City's Sign Ordinance and Section 5.25.406 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 24) All Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094 shall apply. Engineering Department • 1) Install public improvements on Etiwanda Avenue frontage (one-half street) per City "Secondary Arterial" standards and the Etiwanda Specific Plan (Fig. 5-23); including pavement to centerline of street, cobble curb and gutter, 5-foot wide property line adjacent sidewalk, drive approaches, streetlights and street trees as follows and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Extend improvements across the adjacent north property - APN: 1100-031-06 and join with Candlewood Street improvements. a) Provide 9500 Lumen HPSV street lights in accordance with City street lighting standards. b) Install Commercial Drive Approaches with a minimum width of 35 feet in accordance with City Standard Plan No. 101, Type-C. c) Provide access easement for adjacent south property fronting Etiwanda to allow them adequate access to Etiwanda Avenue through the south drive approach. d) Install cobble curb with a 10-inch curb face. e) Provide signing, striping, and protect existing R26 "No Parking" • signs or replace. f) Provide a Class II Bike Lane on Etiwanda Avenue. A & B305 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 7 g) Install street trees along the project frontages per the attached "Street Tree Requirements Form". Revise the existing improvement plans as needed. 2) Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the proposed lot line adjustment is to be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. 3) Dedicate additional right-of-way on Etiwanda Avenue to achieve a total of 50 feet measured from centerline of street (APN: 1100-031-07). Dedication shall extend north across APN: 1100-031-06 to Candlewood Street. 4) Provide shared access 26-foot driveway on the south property line (Etiwanda) with the adjacent south parcel. A 26-foot easement for a joint use driveway and shall be provided prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. 5) Dedicate additional right-of-way on Candlewood Street to achieve a total of 30 feet measured from the centerline of the street. Dedication to extend across APN: 1100-031-06 to and joining with the corner cutoff with Etiwanda Avenue. Vacate any excess right-of-way across APN: 1100-031-01 as well. • 6) If garage on APN: 1100-031-06 is removed by others prior to Building Permit issuance, complete the installation of sidewalk on Candlewood Street prior to a Building Permit issuance. 7) Provide an easement to accept cross-lot drainage from the NAP parcel (APN: 1100-031-06). 8) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical)on the project side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be under-grounded along the entire project frontage,extending to the first pole off-site (north and south), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Etiwanda Avenue shall be under-grounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for under-grounding from future development(redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 9) Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and • demolition are diverted away from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be A & B306 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 8 • submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. Building and Safety Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16(Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit for any underground Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Best Management Practices (BMPs). 2) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 3) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 4) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho • Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for.Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 5) The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for any proposed underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 6) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 7) A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. 8) All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way(Etiwanda Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. • A & B307 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 9 Prior to issuance of a Wall Permit 1) On engineered bio-retention basin retaining walls along the property boundary, the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). In addition,the wall calculations and design shall include hydrostatic forces and shall be sealed so as to be "water tight." 2) A copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. Water Quality Management Plan 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 2) The Water Quality Management Plan prepared by an unknown entity dated January 11,2012, has been reviewed and deemed"Incomplete" dated January 24, 2012. The following corrections are required prior to the final approval of the WQMP: • Page Section Item Cover The engineer of record must wet sign and seal the document. A-4 1.2 Please include the " DRC " number in this section. 1.4 Please include the Santa Ana River Reach 3 (SAR3) which contains bacteria and pathogens in this section. A-8 2.2 In the table item 1.A and 1.0 is correct. Item 1.B should be marked "no", or as an option you may complete the table starting on page A-10 of the document. A-13 3.1.1 A sentence reads "Ultimately, a portion of that easterly strip might be constructed as a parking lot." Please address if the proposed BMPs will still work with the additional impervious area and will the 27 percent landscaping coverage remain or will the landscaping coverage be reduced. A-13 3.1.1 A sentence reads"The swale will slow down the runoff and will infiltrate most of the low flow into its sand-mix section." Please provide a detail of this swale. It is our understanding that this WQMP document will move forward of the grading plan. Therefore details of all BMPs are required to allow for future inspections by the City and for review during the permitting process to determine if the proposed precise grading plan meets the requirements of this WQMP document. A-14 3.1.1 Two sentences read"The area reserved . . . parking stalls in the future." Please address how the additional impervious pavement will affect the • Water Quality Management Plan requirements and the proposed BMP devices. A & B308 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 10 • Page Section Item A-16 3.1.2 A sentence reads "All areas of the side including . . ." A side of what? Please define a "side." A-17 3.1.2 A sentence reads "Only if necessary will a portion of the landscaped area be converted to parking stalls." Please address how the additional impervious pavement will affect the Water Quality Management Plan requirements and the proposed BMP devices. 3.2 We thank you providing a copy of the educational materials in this WQMP document. However we have some questions regarding the educational materials. Please address the following items: 0 SD-32 it appears that the requirements for a roof over the trash storage area and not placing storm drains within the immediate vicinity of the trash storage area have not been met on the Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan; 0 SD-33 why is this included? In the WQMP document you state that vehicle washing is prohibited; 0 TC-31 is a vegetated buffer strip proposed? We did not see a vegetated buffer strip references in the WQMP document; 0 TC-32, one of the limitations are slopes not greater than 20%, the proposed bio-retention basin does not meet this • requirement.; 0 "Fresh concrete and mortar application" -will this project have on-going construction which should be included within the post- construction WQMP document? Would this educational material be better suited to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan?; 0 "Excavation and Grading" - will this project have on-going construction which should be included within the post- construction WQMP document? Would this educational material be better suited to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan?; 0 "Home repair and modeling" - will this project have on-going construction which should be included within the post- construction WQMP document?Would this educational material be better suited to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan?; 0 "Painting" - will this project have on-going construction which should be included within the post-construction WQMP document? Would this educational material be better suited to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan?; • A & B 309 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 11 Page Section Item 0 "Roadwork and Paving" - will this project have on-going construction which should be included within the post- construction WQMP document?Would this educational material be better suited to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan?; 0 Why is the "Low Impact Development Manual" included in the educational materials? How will this benefit the property manager of the project? This document appears to be written for a designer or engineer for the preparation of the site improvement plans. A-24 3.3 A paragraph reads "by separating the low flows and high flows . . . to avoid any co-mingling of the treated and untreated runoff." Please check your design, it appears that two catch basins are intercepting low flows causing a co-mingling of the flows. A-25 3.3 In Table 3-3 the only Pollutant of Concern which is treated is"Bacteria and Viruses." Please explain why the other expected and potential Pollutants of Concerns are not treated. A-26 3.4 The WQMP document describes a vegetated swale and includes educational materials for a vegetated swale, yet Table 3.4 does not • A-27 4.1.1 include a vegetated swale. Please clarify this issue. 0 Should a vegetated swale be included here? 0 A sentence reads "Refer to . . . TC-32 . . " Yet the bio-retention basin does not meet the stated requirements. Please address this issue. A-27 4.1.2 Please include the title of the contact person. This will allow City staff to contact the appropriate individual in the future. A-28 5.1 Please include the title of the contact person. This will allow City staff to contact the appropriate individual in the future. A-29 6 The City of Rancho Cucamonga"Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan Agreement";the following items may be added to the agreement: • File — please add the civil engineer of record's file number here • Prepared By — please add the engineering company here which prepared this document • Checked By—please add the initials of the engineer which prepared this document • Assessor's Parcel Number—please add the APN here • A-31 Exhibit A Is this legal description before or after the lot line adjustment? If it is before the lot line adjustment, please include a proper legal description for the property which is affected for the recorder's office. A & 8310 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 12 • Page Section Item Please provide a full size (24" x 36") WQMP BMP exhibit within the document. In addition the letter size exhibit is missing details of the BMPs and the inspection and maintenance schedule. Please understand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is required to inspect these BMPs on a biennial basis. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Thdtontractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District • (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if • silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. A & B311 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 13 • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. • 10) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 12) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods(i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 17) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. • 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. A & B312 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 14 • 19) AB industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 20) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 21) All residential and commercial structures. shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 22) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths)in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, • the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the areas archaeological heritage. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are • encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take A & B313 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 15 appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the • discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino • County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 ore replanted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term • air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil- stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. A & B314 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 16 • 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use"Green Building Materials"such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy • standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water • Efficient Landscape Ordinance. A & B315 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 17 • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval,Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of •this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best • Management Practices(BMPs)to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. A & B316 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D — HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 Page 18 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the • City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing,or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at • the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perfomi weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the A & B317 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 DRC2011-01094D— HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. July 25, 2012 • Page 19 Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips(counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Secretary I, Jeffrey A. Bloom, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of July 2012, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • A & 8318 01(41Lb COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2011-01094D SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CANDLEWOOD STREET - LOCATION: APN: 1100-031-07 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 4 General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents,officers,or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 12-35, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/ /_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration -$ 2,151.50 X B. Time Limits 1. Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not _/_/_ • commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. • 1 A & B319 Project No. DRC2011-01094D Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ • site plans,architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. . All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan,including a photometric diagram,shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height,and method of shielding so • as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured /_/_ products. D. Shopping Centers 1. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the /_/_ Planning Director: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of(the shopping center/the project). _/ /_ 2 • A & B 320 Project No. DRC2011-01094D Completion Date b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to / /_ include self-closing pedestrian doors. • c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. / /_ d. Roll-up doors. / /_ e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. / /_ f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. / /_ g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed / /_ to be hidden from view. 2. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. / / 3. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and / /_ debris remain for more than 24 hours. 4. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking"and for"employee parking only."- / /_ 5. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an / /_ exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading-No person shall cause the loading,unloading,opening,closing,or _/_/_ other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m.and 7 a.m.unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. • It. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent • properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main /_/_ building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts /_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. • 3 A & B 321 • Project No. DRC2011-01094D • Completion Date 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ • and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 5. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. G. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/_ residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces,whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 2. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for _/_/_ commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. H. Landscaping • 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in / /_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees -24-inch box or larger. 4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking /_/_ stalls. 5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/ /_ tree per 30 linear feet of building. 6. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/ /_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Etiwanda Avenue. 4 • A & B 322 Project No.DRC2011-01094D Completion Date 7. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. • 8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water / /_ efficient landscaping as defined in Ordinance 823 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code I. Environmental • 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of / /_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of$ 557 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. J. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location /_/_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, SR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/_/_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets,detached)including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans,including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations,and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. • 5 A & B323 Project No. DRC2011-01094D Completion Date 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/_/_ • 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department. L. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2011-01094 AND DRC2011-01094D). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or _/_/_ major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. r addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map / /_ 3. Street p Y 9 b recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter). • M. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use,area,fire-resistiveness, building energy efficient standards,and accessibility to public buildings. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. / /_ 3. Provide draft stops in attics. —/ /_ 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. / /_ 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. / /_ 6. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. / /_ N. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading /_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to /_/_ perform such work. 6 • A & B 324 Project No.DRC2011-01094D Completion Date 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check. • 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for / /_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped,and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. 0. Building and Safety - Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, _/_/_ City Grading Standards,and accepted grading practices.The Grading and Drainage Plan(s)shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform _/_/_ such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at _/_/_ the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be _/_/_ completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects /_/_ • and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared,stamped,and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a /_/_ dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for _/_/_ review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be /_/_ prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior _/ /_ to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance _/ /_ letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. • 7 A & B325 Project No. DRC2011-01094D Completion Date 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property / /_ owner(s)to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s)showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. • 12. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way _/_/_ and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where _/ /_ possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot off-set from the public right-of-way or adjacent private property. _/_/_ 15. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted _/ /_ California Plumbing Code. 16. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be _/_/_ constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 17. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under /_/_ parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 18. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond _/_/_ project boundary. 19. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined _/_/_ exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 20. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building _/_/_ • Code. 21. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho _/_/_ Cucamonga handout"Information for trading Plans and Permit". 8 • A & B 326 Project No. DRC2011-01094D Completion Date 22. Grading Inspections: / /_ • a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre- . grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative,the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1. The bottom of the over-excavation 2. Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; 3. At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; 4. The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 23. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan(WQMP)best management practices(BMP) devices. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, ijOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, / /_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas,street trees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from /_/_ street centerline): , 50 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue / /_ 30 total feet on Candlewood Street / / 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / /_ 4. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by _/ /_ deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. 5. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint _/ /_ maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. • 9 A & 8327 Project No. DRC2011-01094D Completion Date 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or _/_/_ noted on the final map. Q. Street Improvements • 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos,landscaped / /_ areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source /_/_ of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except:that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City,$Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: _/_/_ Curb& AC. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Etiwanda Avenue X X X X X X n/a n/a X Candlewood n/a n/a X(e) X n/a X n/a n/a n/a Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement • reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights / /_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing, street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. ineer. d. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. 10 • • • A & B328 Project No. DRC2011-01094D Completion Date e. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash • deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be _/ / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. g. Street trees,a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in /_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed /_/_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree-species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Candlewood Street Eucalyptus sideroxylon Red Ironbark Eucalyptus 8' 30' 15 gal 5 (subject to change) Etiwanda Avenue Eucalyptus sideroxylon Red Ironbark Eucalyptus 8' 30' 15 gal 5 Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to • the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. R. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting /_/_ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. S. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adjacent areas. 2. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/_/_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. • 11 A & 8 329 Project No. DRC2011-01094D Completion Date T. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water,gas, / /_ • electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _/_/_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the /_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. U. General Requirements and Approvals 1. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of /_/_ building permits, whichever occurs first. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / /_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits,a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall / /_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to • Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 4. Provide copy of final Water Quality Management Plan with submittal of grading plans to Building and Safety. QWMP and grading plans are subject to review by the Building Official. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: V. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. /_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,with _/ /_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. • 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / /_ W. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. / /_ 12 • A & B 330 Project No. DRC2011-01094D Completion Date 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within _/ /_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. • 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. _/ /_ 4. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars,metal gates, _/ /_ or alarmed. X. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police _/_/_ with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909)941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at(909)477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. Y. Windows • 1. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede _/ /_ entry to burglars. Z. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ visibility. AA. Alarm Systems • 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and _/_/_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: (909)941-1488. _/ /_ APPLICANT. SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 13 A & B331 • e�`�0 ®®0�� Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District • ° c, Fire Construction Services FIRE , ' STANDARD CONDITIONS December 19, 2011 Funeral Home HMR Architects SEC Etiwanda & Candlewood DRC2011-01094 & 1094D THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building & Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web citvofrc.us. The Fire Entitlement Fee is to be collected at Plan Check. Fee payment must be processed at the Building and Safety Services Department. The case tag will be removed from the parcel by the public service technician upon payment of fees. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply • a. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10 FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems • 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. • Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. A & B 332 FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the2007 California Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed • FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The 201oCalifornia Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard 9-3, Ordinance FD46 and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system fire may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard 5-1. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 151 story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. • c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. • 2 A & B 333 b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. • 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f .Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. • g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 6. Roof Access: must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 5-6. There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all • 3 A & B334 commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. • a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. • b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix . A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits • Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents Repair Garages • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2010 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD50and other implemented and/or adopted standards. • 4 A & B 335 FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. • FCS-14 Map Recordation 1. RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant — Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. (" Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to-the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any • combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of 5 A & B 336 the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at • least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction • Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire • Construction Services. 6 A & B337 9. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. • 10. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 11. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 13. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 'A" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • • 7 • A & B 338 • STAFF REPORT t • PLANNING DEPARTMENT cRANCHO Date: July 25, 2012 UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Interim Planning Director By: Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary Subject: SELECTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OFFICER POSITIONS (CONTINUED FROM THE JULY 11, 2012 MEETING) RECOMMENDATION: The Commission should consider the current Chairman and Vice Chairman positions and by minute action, either affirm the existing officers or select new officers. The term is for one year reviewed annually. BACKGROUND: The Administrative Regulations for the Planning Commission provide for the Planning Commission to select its own officers. Each year the Planning Commission selects a Chairman and Vice Chairman to serve a one-year term. Commissioner Munoz became Chairman and Commissioner Howdyshell became Vice Chairman in July of 2010. • Respectfully submitted, Je ey . Bloom Interim Planning Director JAB/LS • Item C f— a STAFF REPORT __ • PLANNING DEPARTMENT CUCAMONGA Date: July 25, 2012 UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Interim Planning Director By: Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary Subject: SELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS (CONTINUED FROM THE JULY 11, 2012 MEETING) RECOMMENDATION: The Commission should consider the current Design Review Committee membership and by minute action, either affirm the existing membership or select new members. The term is for one year reviewed annually. BACKGROUND: The Design Review Committee reviews the architectural design, signage, building colors, site plans and landscape plans for proposed development projects in Rancho Cucamonga. The Design Review Committee consists of the Planning Director or his designee and two Planning Commissioners. The Planning Commission selects new or affirms the existing Commission representation from amongst themselves each year. Currently, Chairman Munoz and • Commissioner Wimberly are serving on the Design Review Committee and Vice Chairman Howdyshell is the first alternate. There are no current vacancies on the Committee. Respectfully submitted, 2 ffr A. Bloom Interim Planning Director JAB/LS • 411 Item D • STAFF REPORT V i • • PLANNING DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: July 25, 2012 CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Interim Planning Director By: Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary Subject: SELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION TRAILS COMMITTEE MEMBERS (CONTINUED FROM THE JULY 11, 2012 MEETING) RECOMMENDATION: The Commission should consider the current Commission representation for the Trails Advisory Committee (TAC). By minute action, the Commission should affirm their current representation or select two of its members plus an alternate to serve for a 24-month term (2 years). BACKGROUND: The Trails Advisory Committee is comprised of two members of the Park and Recreation Commission, two members of the Planning Commission, and two Members at Large. The Members at Large serve as representatives of the biking and equestrian community. The Committee is facilitated by a staff member designated by the Planning Director. The staff member • is a non-voting member. The Trails Advisory Committee assists both the Park and Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission by reviewing proposed projects that may impact the existing trail system, its use, future improvements and addressing resident concerns. The TAC reviews and recommends priorities for trail improvement projects and forwards those recommendations to the Planning Commission and the Park and Recreation Commission for consideration which then are forwarded to the City Council as part of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Typically, the Planning Commission reviews the TAC membership in July if a Commission member is nearing the end of a term. Currently, Chairman Lou Munoz serves the TAC and was installed as a regular member in 2006 and therefore has completed 3 terms. Commissioner Howdyshell has served the TAC since 2008 and has completed 2 terms. Commissioner Oaxaca has served as Alternate since 2010 and has completed 1 term. Respectfully submitted, Jeff e A. loom, Interim Planning Director JAB/LS • Item E 42j_ otz_d- C-677 ,At,/mod/e North/West corner of east and foothill South/East corner of foothill and Etiwanda North/West corner of foothill and Etiwanda -Jack Benny beside the wash Arrow and Rochester North West and North east Corner North side of arrow and red oak Civic Center Dr Red oak St Between church and Town Center on Terra Vista Dr. North East foothill and Milliken phone#946-7618 Church and foothill Day Creek / Baseline both north and south east Corner Available-Jersey and Milliken 909-605-1100 Available-Haven below Jersey 909-980-1234 Available-Arrow and Haven (Both) North West and South West -909 -605-1100 and 418-2020 On haven above 6th St.Eastside Haven south east —below 6th st Leasing office 909-989-7771 lot corner of 4th and haven 6th and Center Dr. northside corner Hermosa and 6th northside corner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Archibald and Acacia St. Huge lot 1! JUL 25 2012 RECEIVED - PLANNING _ Ninth and Archibald-south west_corner Arrow and Archibald north west corner Foothill and Hermosa southeast corner Huge Lot-foothill west side of Center Dr on the south side. Huge lot — Elm and Foothill south east corner Foothill and Milliken across the street from Lowes (2huge lots!) Foothill `Both" morth and south side on west side of Day creek. • SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 25, 2012 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS Vint- (4( so s✓ Io9 its.___ ,7 rcvrga 1 r 3� 3 &Li\ 1,,Z/0111,1 t 03 cbt Li eyw 873 ia �ivici ,.' Ai fl os� 0fa e(Mac, or 4 %0i-8/9/47 ,E/C'uref OFr2 / y-ci-C /2093 Gtzyu (L'&F O/( ,E-,uru® l e'rcc -DCM S (0140 z¢ed Cir - / 21- 1 Dt 95)-b9 _ _ a ! ,4� /_ ,�,_,,. _.n / id dIzcZ_ . a, i 9/7 Wow; k vtl- (? o Skin 9 /l�Lua atn Pk tfli 3� 6,-,,, , 1 1441/ �243k- &cn,�e � �3t Pa) 1 12J11 Cisl`i7 f/ y PCBC,.4- 9 / )1j Pei run ;51=o enuoke At ( ktuAL Cucaw q«34 41Lti-Sc,+ b 0-ro' t19,43 ba2v4vot, P¢. i (2c, CA at'739 1r . /.-460 - cam- ifc _ - C-h n S k liC42A ( )g-k 4 C R co-t f,a C 1CCUC 51737 Are - f4/chair' i ?'3(o Sint e 6CCek cJ kc 91.)_17 . f .-e en - F iy, _fiv-o 'a-infri-ti,,4 A- (ea / C A t Q -4 7137 fluual.( goo, 44/%4 /S, 7S vt/e,virf,eeLQ <ef9( eva7fy er. /a'ml ogerhwnca LfI vn-v)l� /2-7; L �c d( atiai 's'-.4- (/l--' )&d &n p • ( 21 60 eVcrma r- t. , . \ ...... \ A )I4 I - t&l i.'l It l ? LA _• I . A • 1u} to (Zm B°0 (ow Uj 4,( Eat. Cut 444/1 ¶k3t1 SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 25, 2012 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS 1 Q�_t 7TOitec tz-4-Ko cal .-�t f a,1r ko G.zca t` 0-6 e /ZuSS-Z V 1 5 /U 04-mA/44-o1 7A/cf-p, 2_ i, 6JcU-,,t_ Age, qU&k Cat.,daw-1Z PI Pi` 'L c01 wA" -ttl\,\ k'LA k S i — 1,o f L-v l 4—( , 7tG • , -a e 3 s C 0,,---Iii L -751-3 e vy.9 “ ) CA-24‘ L3 r a n r - cl / cr� .. . ..y 173`©al01 ,s..1 k -zits c c d a_srd zvt J - � <�Cnc,ct c ,S72 d 7e 977092Z/1;155 l71 C�0/,F2,e v � 1i24c.(aroc n Gc t1N4,�• - -1-Vi( SI- FL ft f g4t4 Cco i l ni ma .y 11-1 t 5/Prvn.,� , r4C,4_ 4,,;1 rile? _■ \oZ Det -i k s\ kLi p F cm/4'1Z R.c cll. °trot, . hi" 44, f >-1 Zjork& or Ra- ce. k (7(77 ? 0 9 9 ¥ 2 ° z ƒ -1 n § r � I I = A@ 2 -, / 5 .0 f / O o ---I o 0 / G • _s > 2 n = ° 7 _� D 3 2 G 3 \ c / - ■ _. E g . . Z / a £ a O ° 2 7- C m 5 o Z / / k \ 0 2 D. a > 7- -0 6 0 & 0_ = Cl,co ° n = / $ o 3 E 5' o ] 0_ E f = f / 2 o m CL / Z cn 0 \ § / ? ° - £ \ J e ° \ § $_ 0 'V \ - - CS ° (0 D - � _ r cp \ 0 / k 0 % 0 c CD a- E » \ % O CD\ a \ 0 / ° ? 0 CI / 2 / / \ / / 0 in n \ co CD 3 9 / 0 a 0 \ co % 2 & - k B £ 2 E 2 k s / - 0 / (D.-0- a n o 0 - / ` 2 0 c n » § Q 0 0 o 3 0 0 3 § E 2 / \ 7- R 9 8 a) o R C13- o £ § ` 0" n CD _ : 2 § / .CL 5 c k ) / n $ 7 § CU = 0 & ( \ o c \ $ \ 7 < / ¢ CI al % ƒ 5 0 2 m ° ° ° _ / \ = E t \ c E ° a \ k m » c 9 0 0 m CD ® m 2 . $ n / f 3 CL $ k. F:)". co o \ � A / 5- 0 / 0 a) _ 2 a = § \ 0 E § a % ƒ ° £ / 3 Co » 0 0 3 ) E J 7 st. o ° / / 0 \ 3 e' 9 m 2 @ � ET al $ / _ a. ] o ° o 3 % 0 g . -o o csl 0 o 3 . . 7 co., fir" . - .,— n; .m - '5uttobk 'r?1 a� : . . c A. • c --co-! ��AA -- ,V _ __ ::,. -_� .. .fir r , 1't I .`T r ``I .off _, ; • V 001.311‘,C .�—. .` – s t .-::".,r'..1..<14• ill 0 .11 .. r 1 ISA -t; t`Vrst2!Mountan'a Pi h,,w :,f s I w.yn;-:. 'ot etto•P1:- ;t- '// t, rPIrot;Pt rr _ m. •* I . '-"CCS• -i-ol Ps te•r-F\--: -, i 8 •••. #.• , ''''' ': .. '4.-:1 , , I. ' -4,-,--;":. -.111;,,e1:4 ,(1-00 ' = • • • -R:11.0,1n.-C•t i aci - I ■ c, i v` 'fl� t . : E- ." - • y. M- ni arolle4P1'• a) a a o'. _' L t l u. i. i. r P6 -',,• �' l.C. !Mai auz Pl •, ti W.-�-Pecan Ave •1- • ,::- IT. . .6 • g co �? , m. cn o . , r, �° O� o J ��.,!• U ~` N C�`Y 1{ It 1111 J1 r 10. { �Jr', i•'.: .�'' r .0:I.' '. It 1 _ _—. Cilwand I Ave 1 �'--�'�� } 1 _ -. •�= 111 - _ 1 to i . v.. I I•_m r v I `1 --n .om - ""`7 t tW • t• J• . I- , in. 4...?. - . ` I,.j'"� —.fit 1r ,-"(11) 41 V-- -''J- :.�'4 Ni.. ,yam^ i. 'e •1. .,- i{`�. S{ o • , :.v/. U O .• , . o W11d �•P t .' -* l - -4i ` N. pl/�•- .•• • 1 - e 3 `- _ r `k s �`i b.,x -N .J -- Ederi Ave / p, W31 co '' —r t f-' •-'a+"{ ,*� �_� RI 'Q O ( p,.w'r 11 _ i �A�• . f SI C .,f Z*-..irr:,.14,..'Z./d,..„,.....1�o i61r� <., s " o 1K•ew-Ave- Atw ,-a i ,, $4 of i ..(P-r-;71- i sc it: sd,,• I , i t .l-G'� 1 �' j I 1 .., I � ° ' p El,?1 C'azar Pa c, __/ 3 ter— O: e Pi ..11- �r ala Gt �r. a> Creo C,• ''`—. .San G .l, Ir •t o�T`-•Q ` • Y' o I ° e •`it - -. =� -n ,i I c�,� _ _.. c is .,, _ >•ti: +"' u Esta,lC ; Z: i , 1 �,. �-^._1..V ? i—,—�`— m _ —ti_• y►.i� �#�1.__...r •II CU I `ter—t om-HO �, ,, ;',,,`, o-rI t (DI ? I . 1'—` `--:..I�rrr a • –< Galls(o,a-?1.'- ! i .(1).° ,.,: iZ° T ■ �. -s, ' m IV 4 't cello r,ver 1.1 •. 1r .. ',.4 ''.Wes_ i„•.... ., '';Aloe �,� .tip ! -1. o �1., I 01.-11111111 • ; - _ , . ` --. - ,, - -Day�Greek-Blvd— ,I1�� Q r, ..„, c" o CPtJ,` dpi`r,! = ,, " .� I,1 - ,-(..w:wit 1 .� FN S l f �''F)�r i I -..r ,�. , i 1 , - / . J.': ,.rt��cr - �_ _' _ r , � _ — . -r - --i- 40 ,. '1 TIC ' • ki`� )4 �V e4thavinpJ. 0 , y . l,' z H .u,-,, sr,„-.u n • •lo c 1 �� ,.1 c -) r- ,•_ - nY.• -!c_ I, , /i'k�A.....' -� I. N . o .m T: r o r .t ',I 4-4. u •c. Lar.. cc f _O aiN � ., .. 1* ,, •• ti o • ' ' ,y y ,n --" nl .45 - _ -j " s;x.+.rS .t •+ :x- Rocnes'er-Ave ' O I an•cr r t , , , si is, )' 410.4.J'f r '• • P I l � ,. _ . -.QL)J.r► reftg" .r* _ _ .-I r 1L N 'Sr I. A.'I_1 0 kI i I G J� ' . •'` �,�{ f 0 + . ' . � .► •, , r' � 602ce e--",7 Home > Categories > Other> Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services Inc. from building a proposed funeral home at the corner of E Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now Please let your voice be heard and join the community in preventing SCI Funeral Services Inc. from building a proposed funeral home at the corner of E •• Sian Blog • Signatures • Email friends Signatures 155 total Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 > 1. 1 Name: Tim Truong on Feb 26, 2012 Comments: I VOTE NO TO THIS PROJECT. NO NO NO NO THIS IS A HOME PROPERTY NOT SOME KIND OF FUNERAL HOME. I DONT WANT TO SEE THIS HAPPEN. I VOTE NO! NO! NO! Flag 2. 2 Name: Xuan Zhang on Feb 26, 2012 Comments: NO NOT SUPPORT FOR THIS PROJECT THIS MIGHT HURT THE NEIGHBORHOOD NO Flag, 3. 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Name: Douglas Ueda on Mar 1, 2012 JUL 2 5 2012 Comments: RECEIVED - PLANNING Flag 4. 4 Name: Lory Ueda on Mar 1, 2012 Comments: Flag 5. 5 Name: Kimie Leho on Mar 3, 2012 Comments: I DO NOT SUPPORT SUPPORT THIS FUNERAL HOME PROPOSAL. Flag 6. 6 Name: Jennie Dang on Mar 3, 2012 Comments: Please do not build a funeral home among our residential neighborhood. I STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS FUNERAL HOME PROPOSAL. Flag 7. 7 Name: Danny Dang on Mar 3, 2012 Comments: NO NO NO! TO FUNERAL HOME. Flag 8. 8 Name: Jane Mrotek on Mar 3, 2012 Comments: I am totally against having a funeral home within a-residential neighborhood community. Flag 9. 9 Name: Christian Leho on Mar 3, 2012 Comments: Due to cultural beliefs, funeral home in the residential area will not bring good positive vibe to the neighborhood. There are just too many negative aspects about it. I strongly oppose this proposal. Thank you for starting this petition. I hope that it will be in favor of our community. Flag 10. 10 Name: George Sandoval on Mar 4, 2012 Comments: No hearses through my neighborhood Flag 11. 11 Name: Wendy Sandoval on Mar 4, 2012 Comments: Please keep our children safe! Flag 12. 12 Name: Wendy Sandoval on Mar 4, 2012 Comments: Please keep our children safe Flag 1113 Name: Jose Torres on Mar 5, 2012 Comments: Flag 14. 14 Name: Ati Karizi on Mar 5, 2012 Comments: Flag 15. 15 Name:Mark Horvath on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: Flag 16. 16 Name:Anonymous on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: NO funeral home in our lovely neighborhood please! Flag 17. 17 Name: Lisa McClough on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: Absolutely no funeral home. Flag 18. 18 Name: James McClough on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: Flag 19. 19 Name: Jacqueline Wells on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: Flag 20. 20 Name: Anonymous on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: This is an unfavorable business for our community. Flag 21.21 Name: Alena Paulson on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: traffic is already terrible with the surrounding schools, access to the freeway and Etiwanda would be a nightmare. This area cannot handle any more congestion, please do not allow this project to go through Flag 22. 22 Name: Brian Paulson on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: No Funeral Homes by where my children play!!! Flag 23. 23 Name: Sean Xu on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: Flag 24. 24 Name: Mikhail Zeeb on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: This funeral home is not a good fit or conducive to our neighborhood. It would increase traffic flow, lower property values and the health risk (whether perceived or factual) would causes irreparable depreciation as much as 17% in some studies. Flag 25. 25 Name: Ken Hong on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: No funeral homes in my neighborhood. Bad for the kids. Flag 26. 26 Name: Mira Nam on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: scary scary scary! i haven't been able to sleep just thinking about a funeral home planning to come to my home. Flag 27. 27 Name: Ho Nam on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: i strongly oppose building a funeral home here. funeral homes should be close to cemeteries. thank you. Flag 28. 28 Name: Anonymous on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: While I support bringing more businesses/revenues into our City, I will not lend my support to this project because the location alone is terrible! Etiwanda is a major street but it is predominantly lined with single family homes and counts with dozens of kids walking to/from school daily. Adding more traffic to this location would increase their safety risk and become an eyesore for an otherwise nice neighborhood. Additionally, there are several homes for sale (one right across the street from the proposed site) that would be in jeopardy of not selling, dropping to an even lower value or staying on the market for an unforseeable amount of time should a funeral home be built. Flag 29. 29 Name: Chimezie Ikeanyi on Mar 6, 2012 • Comments: Building a funeral home so close to my home will not only increase traffic flow, lower property value and health risk, my children will be Beverly affected by it because they will be scared to go outside and play. So this will have a negative psychological effect on them. Flag 30. 30 Name: Christopher Ikeanyi on Mar 6, 2012 Comments: I am vehemently against building a funeral home right in front of my home. It is a horrible idea and will destroy our family-oriented neighborhood. Flag 31. 31 Name: Maria Davis on Mar 7, 2012 Comments: My 13 year old son has developed anxiety. when we were driving by the propose site one of my older kids made a comment and not long after that he start it asking questions about death and we're to the point where he has to have an evaluation to see if he needs counseling. Flag 32. 32 Name:Anonymous on Mar 7, 2012 Comments: Flag 33. 33 Name: Howard Nguyen on Mar 7, 2012 Comments: This neighborhood does not need a funeral home. Home owners are suffering enough from the economy; please don't place more stress on us with a creepy home of the dead just around the corner. Flag 34. 34 Name: Matthew Wysocki on Mar 7, 2012 Comments: Flag • 35. 35 Name: Don Hathaway on Mar 7, 2012 Comments: Flag - 36. 36 Name: Sergio Castillo on Mar 7, 2012 Comments: Flag 37. 37 Name: Gladstone Rennie on Mar 7, 2012 Comments: No to SCI Funeral Services Flag 38. 38 Name: Frank Jou on Mar 7, 2012 Comments: I am glad that we have this website to work together about this issue. My neighbor Kathy told me this issue two weeks ago because she received mail. But I didn't. So I made about 60 copies and passed to my nearby street (Crestfield and Gold Leaf and wild horse) house by house on these passed two weekend when I walked dog. I talked many people and just 2 out of 60 t received the mail. The rest like me didn't know this till I talked to them. It seems funeral company did this on purpose just mailed few household -and claimed they inform all community. Anyway, I am now glad more people aware and we need to work it together to oppose this plan in order not keep our community better value and nice. Thanks again whoever created this site for community. See all of my community friends on Thursday 6pm on 03/08/12. Flag - 39. 39 Name: Jorge Borda on Mar 7, 2012 Comments: Flag 40. 40 Name: Martha Godinez on Mar 7, 2012 Comments: Flag 41. 41 Name: Lory San Gabriel on Mar 7, 2012 Comments: Flag 42. 42 Name: Yesenia Gomez on Mar 7, 2012 Comments: Flag 43. 43 Name: Lindsay P. on Mar 8, 2012 Comments: NO!! This is a residential neighborhood and no place for a funeral home! Flag 44. 44 Name: Carol Pike on Mar 8, 2012 Comments: A funeral home has no place in a residential neighborhood for all the reasons listed in the petition. Flag 45. 45 Name: Charlize Li on Mar 8, 2012 Comments: Flag 46. 46 Name: Philip Emchick on Mar 8, 2012 Comments: Flag 47. 47 Name: Diego H Sevilla on Mar 8, 2012 Comments: No funeral home in my Neighborhood !!! Why ? Because my wife and I worked very hard to buy a nice home with all our savings and sacrificed a lot to get here. Never would we have considered this location knowing of any present or future funeral home in the area ! Flag 48. 48 Name: Vince Palmer on Mar 8, 2012 Comments: Flag 49. 49 Name: Laura Rocha on Mar 8, 2012 Comments: I do NOT want my property value to go down and I do NOT want any more traffic in that area!! Flag 50. 50 Name: Araceli R. Hernandez on Mar 8, 2012 Comments: NO to a funeral home. Traffic is already bad and there are too many kids walking to and from school and Victoria Gardens. ABSOLUTELY NOT. Flag Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 > » Sign Petition Now! Sponsored links iPctitions is owned and operated by Angle Three Associates, LLC - All material © Copyri ght Angle Three Associates, LLC, 1998-2012 -Terms of Use J 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES ,i PAGE 01/17 Cozy July 25, 2012 Dear Planning Commissioner Richard Fletcher and Comission Members, My wife and I are concerned residents of Rancho Cucamonga and have grave concers over the proposed funeral home in our community. We have conducted our own research and have unconvered some very disturbing fads about the past and present owners of the property as well as the SCI corporation. Relevant documentation follows for your review. • Ethan Ruch is the previous owner of the property where the historic building is presently located. • Ethan Ruch owes investors and local business people and residents tens upon tens of thousands of dollars. He is known to mismanage and comingle investor money in several "investment" endeavors,including some in Mexico. • As of about 5 to 6 years ago he had pulled out approximately$3 million of equity out of the larger property area (including where the post office was located). • About 5 years ago, Ethan was offered$1.2 million from SCI for the historic property, but Ethan refused at the time because he was greedy.There were also problems because SCI wanted to relocate the historic building— they didn't want it because of a variety of problems, including the desire for more business frontage space along Etiwanda. • There is strong evidence to support an illegal "straw sale" by Ethan to the present owner who is a relative—his wife's aunt who is a resident of Montclair.We believe the straw sale was done for two key reasons: 1)to prevent Ethan's property from going into foreclosure,and 2) so he could still retain behind-the-scenes control to complete a sale to SCI for$2 million. • SCI has an established pattern of buying mortuary property and then shutting it down to retain control of the business over a larger and larger geographic area in Southern California.Their objective is to create a monopoly and control prices.They include stipulations,when the property is sold to another entity,that a mortuary business cannot be reestablished.They have done this to other mortuary properties in the following areas: o Glendora,CA—Custer Christianson Mortuary o West Covina,CA—Custer Christianson Mortuary o Baldwin Park,CA—Custer Christianson Amar Willow o El Monte,CA • The historic building experienced a mysterious fire approximately 2 weeks after the close of the alleged straw sale to the relative of Ethan. If the historic building had been completely gutted,the"problem"of retaining the building for a mortuary business would disappear, making the transaction even more lucrative for Ethan and SCI. The following should not be taken as a threat. It describes how seriously we feel about this proposed transaction. Should the City and/or Planning Commission fail to act responsibly in this situation,we will come forward, initiate the proper lawsuits,and begin appropriate recall activity. More evidence of the above facts can readily be obtained.We can obtain it,so you should be able to obtain it just as easily. We will be closely monitoring the situation. Our.sincere thanks for your service;and attention to this matter. CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mr.and Mrs.Annonymous Rancho Cucamonga Resident JUL 252012 RECEIVED - PLANNING ZTellsR I8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUL 2 5 2012 s RECEIVED - PLANNING It.)• *1.1 4ijes: 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469216 STAPLES PAGE 02/17 Branch:OCC,User:3600 Title Officer:00 Order:0000000 Station D3:PYHI Recording Requested By RemNed to made Record%Caen/of Bea StenarSae 11f16r2011 • 1110 FO1 North A,..o ran rme Company, Inc. DENNIS DRAEGER CLEM — RECORDER File No.920104065296-11 I A — It TO: Egg North American Title Company Namt �a George Manor and Lodes mango off: 2011-0494480 Tatec 1 Pager I Street Address 7567 Edwanda Avenue 1110Y�tfl�I!I1 p @gpNplfNt11Ig11 lNR�I11IlppNIfHII11NtI`1I1@p9II Cry&State Rattt3lo Cucamonga,CA 91739 IBd 1 lgUllll�161DIIp1111� a rri.00 ORDER NO. 1065296 /,.,T. . A.P.No. 1100-03106 VJ r T� TRAP 015022 - The VnderOgnid GYlydv(s)OmLev(s):DOCUMENTARY ThANSPER 7Plt 3302.50;CITY T1IANSFE*TAX$NONE; I ; 3 computed an the considmatpn or ale vane OtPiaPe•t)occue9a4 OR [ 3 computed an the ttns4dermdn or cud value Mss value of Meng andfa enwmbnimax renwhdmj a time of sale, I 3 teenco peroted ereo; CIty Of menace CueOnio le,and FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,receipt of which Is hereby acknowledged, Ethan I.Ruth,a married man as his sole and separate property hereby GRANTS to George Mans and Lourdes A. Manzo, husband and wife as Joint Tenants the follovHng deSatbed property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California: THE NORTH 115 FEET OF THE WEST 189.39 FEET OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF LOT 12,BLOCK"R", ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS,IN THE an'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY of SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA,AS PER MAP RECORDED IN 80OK 2 OF MAPS,PAGE 24,IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Dated: 08/26/2011 ccwmo ujRN �cnt/adya La on S'cpMrt,aher 29 adll ,beraeme, Eth v qkat) [r a n i! A ,Nagy Futile.Pe uy ;peewee Cital..4 Tuck% who preyed to me an the basis of satisfactory evidence to Do the person(s) "roofname(s)Wore p better d COtilevernal tnstmme t and admanaligM to AARON J.LEAL me that re/sRArey aecuted the sauna m hauftelIheh emAt%ahed espedty(les) Op,npNaarert•19�fr 16 and eve by htsilie/melt,ignetore(t)on Me instrument the permn(e)ortipe Notary Public-Cel0eml9 may upon bdMN of whld'the pence(s)acted.euccted the Moment. e� 'i) -,1, San Oernardlne County I CCddy under PENALTY OF PERJURY wider the tans of the State of Caaan a Mg COlade Fygree Me IS 2013 drat the tbregong Oa • • . true end Carlo. {_ -`- r-L-- warless my oe,a/.'•,7�/I nNi Signature Yen Taa swtemmds,a SAME AS AROYE SAN BERNARDINO,CA Doeument:DO 2011.494420 Pagc:1 of 1 Printed on:7/24/2012 4:42 PM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 03/17 Branch :OCC,User:3600 Title Officer:00 Order:0000000 , Station ID:PY II RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Retarded le Meal R°rard"Conde e18-Elan°"'^° 1 VT8l2On NORTH AMERICAN TITLE CO. +`:, DENNIS DRAEGER tee PM eta Rccotding Rupsted 8i `. ASSESSOR - RECORDER- CLERK sm"vldane Savings bank. r.s.s. . 608 North American Title Company - Return To: idX 1 Pages: 18 Oodr, 2011—0494481 01 Pseviamat ans (morns ran.tir Bark, 17.11.14. . e PIM 1 11 1 Terns Prepared By: Frootoone Stavinxrev flask, Z..5.N. ORDER 110. 1065296 ;Space Above Trite Line For Reterdmmum a m APN9 1100-031-05 DEED OF TRUST TRA# 015022 MIN 100048700896811676 DEFINITIONS Words aced in multiple sections of this document arc defined below and other words are defined in Sections 3, I I. 13, 18. 20 and 21. Certain rule"regarding the usage of words used in this document are also provided.in Section 16. (A)"Security instrument"means fit document,which is datedNovomber 2, 2011 • together with all Riders to this document. (B)"Borrower"is GEORGE MANZO.AND LOURDES A.MANZO,HUSBAND AND WIFE Borrowers address Is 5271 HOME VtPDS STRBET, MONTCLAIR, CA 91763 . Borrower is the toaster under this Security instrument. (C)tender"is Provident Savings Bank, F.s.B. Lender is a Fedora]. Corporation orgmsized and existing under the laws of the united States of America 351-89681167 CALIFORNIA-Single Fbmly Annie Ma./Fraddle Mae UNIFORM INSTRUMENT W)TN PIERS Farm 3005 1/01 Wynne Kebab Raanoal Services VMPS. A(CAleut I) ,!. Pepe 1 et a m" • SAN BERNARDINO,CA Dacument:TD 2011.494481 Page:1 of18 Printed on:7/24/2012 4:42 PM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 04/17 Branch:OCC,Uscr:3600 Title Officer:00 Order:0000000 Station ID:PYW _ , i Lender's address is 3756 Central Ave., Riverside, CA 92506 (II)'tnntet"it Provident Financial Carp. , a Caali.eornia Corporation (E) ".HERS"is Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. MERS is a separate corporation that in acting solely as a nominee for Lender and Lender'a summers and assigns. MEM is the beneflcisry under this Seenta;Trtatraratat MERS is organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, and has an address and telephone n0mber of P.U. Sox 2026, Flint MI 48501 2026. tel. (SSS)679-1MIERS. (F)"Note"manna the promissory note signed by Borrower and dated 1lovember 2, 2011 . The Note states that Borrower owes Lender two hundred twenty thousand and 00/100 Dollars (U.S. S 220,000.00 )phut interest Borrower has promised to pay this debt in regular Periodic Maputo-Is and to pay the debt in fill not later than December 1, 2041 - (C) 'Property"means the property that is described below under the heading"Transfer of Rights in the Ptvp.."ry" (H) "Loan"means the debt evidenced by the Note,plus interest, any prepayment charges and late charges due under the Note.and all sums due under this Security Instrument plus interest. (I) "Riders"means all Riders to this Security Inatnnnmt that are executed by Borrower. The following Riders are to be cxecured by Borrower[check box as applicable]: ®Adjustable Rate Rider Condominium Rider - Second Home Rider Balloon Rider Planned Unit Development Rider 1-4 Family Rider VA Rider Biweekly Payment Rider Othet(s)Iweeify) (.1) "Applicable Law" mane all controlling applicable federal. state and loved statutes, rgulaeiom@. ordinances and administrative rules and orders(that have the effect of law)in well as all applicable final. non.appeNable judicial opinions. (E) '"Community Association I etas, Fees, and Assessments"means all duet, fees, assessments and other charges dot arc imposed on Borrower or the Property by n condominium association, homeowners association or similar organization. (L) "Electronic Fonds Transfer" moms any transfer of fends, other than a transaction originated by cheek draft, or similar paper instrument which is initiated through an electronic terminal, telephonic instrument, computer, or magnetic tape so as to order. instruct, or authorize a financial institution to debit or credit an account. Such arm includes, but is not limited to, point'ofsalr trans/biaa, automated taller machine transactions, transfers initiated by telephone. wire transfers, and automated clearinghouse transfers. (M)"Ecerow Items"means those items that are described in Scedon 3. (N) "Mieceuaarena Proceeds"means any compensation, settlement, award of damages, or procteds paid by any third party(other than insurance proceeds paid under the coverages described in Section 5)fees (i) damage to.. or destruction of, the Property; (Ii) condemnation or other taking of all or any part of the Property; (iii)conveyance in lieu of condemnation; or(iv) misrepresentations of, or omissions as to, the value and/or condition of the Property. (0) "Mortgage Insurance"means insurance protecting Lender against the nonpayment of, or default on. the Loan. (P)"Periodic Payment"means the regularly scheduled amount due for(f)principal and interest under the Note,plus(ii)any amounts under Section 9 of this Security Instrument. 351-89681167 CAUFORMTA-SIngle Famay-Fannh Mee/rredah Mae UNIFORM INSTRUMENT WITH Perms 5005 1/01 1/MPe-6A(CAI aunt Pea et IS What SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document:TD 2011.494481 Pagc:2 of IS Printed on:7/24/20I2 4:42 PM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 05/17 Branch:OCC,User:3600 Tide Officer:00 Order:0000000 Station ID ;PXHI (Q) "RESPA" senora the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act(12 U.S.C. Section 2601 et seq.)and its implenenting regulation. Regulation X(24 C.F.R. Part 3500), as they might be amended from time to time, or any additional or successor legislation or regulation that governs the mane subject matter. As used. in this Security Instrument, "RESPA" refers to all tequiranenta and restrictions that me imposed in regard to a "federally related mortgage Man" even if the Loan does not qualify as a "federally related mortgage loan" under RESPA. (R)"Successor In Interest of Borrower"means any party that has taken title to the Property, whether or not that patty has assumed Borrower's obligations under the Note and/or this Security Instrument. TRANSFER OF RIGHTS IN THE PROPERTY The beerciary of this Security Instrument in MERS (solely as nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns) and the successors and assigns of MFRS. This Security Instrument secures to Lander. (i) the repayment of the Limn, and all renewals, extensions end modifications of the Note; and (ii) the performance of Borrower's covenants and agreements wit this Security Instrument and the Note. For this purpose,' Borrower irrevocably grants and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale, the following deaaibed property located in the Cooney of San Bernardino • [Type ofRenerdiag lorhdic*.) Wants of Recording isrlsdiaiaal TAD NORTH 114 FEET OF TES NEST 189.39 FEET OF T8E SOUTII ONE—HALF OF LOT 12. BLOCK "R", ETIWANDA COFANX SANDS, 110 THE cm OP flNCSO =ANDREA, COUNTY OF SAN 9ERNATiDXNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE 26, IN rpm ofltCE OF TEE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Parcel iD Number: 1100-031-06-0-00 which Currently has the address of 7567 ETITOINI3A AVENUE ISMS/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA (Coy], Califbrnie 91739 /Rip Cede] ("Ptoperty Address"): TOGETHER WITH all the improvements now or hereafter erected on the property, and all coaetnnaas, ace.% and fixtures now or hereafter a part of the property. All replacements and additions s also be covered by this Security instrument All of Me foregoing is referred to in this Security Instrument as the"Property." Borrower understands and agrees that MERS holds only legal title to the interests granted by Borrower in this Security Instrument, but, if nec asey to comply with law or custom, MERS(as nominee for Lender and Lender's suca•asors and assigns)has the right to exercise ony or all of those interests, including, but not limited to, the right to foreclose and sell the Property; and to take any action required of Lender including, but not limited to, rctcasing and canceling this Security Instrument BORROWER COVENANTS that Borrower is lawfully seised of the estate hereby conveyed and has the right to grant and convey the Property and that the Property is unencumbered, except for enewnbranees 351-89691167 CAUFORNIASatgle Family.Famde MaaIFroddle Nat HYSSOP'S INSTRUMENT WITH MM. Penn 3003 tIOS VMPS•OA(CAllorut) roses ft 45 vegac Air✓I t57 SAN BERNARDINO.CA Document:TD 2011.494481 Page:3 of 18 Printed on:7/24/2012 4:42 PM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 06/17 Branch:OCC,User:3600 Title Officer:00 Order:0000000 Station ID :PYLII • of record. Borrower warrants and will defend generally the title to the Property against all claims and demands, subject to any ennanlmmue a of record THIS SECURITY INSTRUMENT combine uniform commons for national use and non-uniform covenants with limited variations by jurisdiction to constitute a uniform security instrument covering real property. UNIFORM COVENANTS. Borrower and Lander covenant and agree as follows: 1. Payment t of Principal, Interest, Escrow Items, Prepayment Charges, and Late Charges. Borrower shall pay when due the principal of, and interest on, the debt evidenced by the Note and any prepayment charges and late charges due under the Note. Borrowet shall also pay funds for Escrow items pursuant to Seetmn 3. Payments due under the Note and this Security Instrument shaft be made in U.S. currency. However, if any check or other instrument received by Lender as payment under the Note or thin Security Instrument is returned to Lender unpaid, Lender may rem:lira that any or all serissequent payments due under the Note and this Security Instrument be made in one or more of the following tons, as selected by Lender. (a) cash: (b) money order: (c) certified check, bank cheek, trntur&s check or cashier's check, provided any such check. is drawn upon an institution whose deposits are insured by a federal agency, instrumentality, or entity;or(d)Electronic Fends Transfer. Payments are deemed received by Lender when received at the location designated in the Note or at such other location as may be designated by Lender in accordance with the notice provisions in Section 15. Lender may return any payment or partial payment if the payment or partial payments are insufficient to bring the Loan current. Linde may accept any payment or partial payment insufficient to bring the Loan current. without waiver of any rights hereunder or prejudice to its rights to refuse such payment or partial payments in the future, but Lender is nor obligated to apply such payments at the time such payments are accepted. If each Periodic Payment is applied as of its scheduled due date, then Lender need not pay interest an unappiied fiends. Lender may hold such unapplied finds until Borrower makes payment to bring the Loan current if Borrower does not do so within a reascrable period of time, Lender shall either apply such fiords or return than to Borrower. If not applied eerlier, such fimds will be applied to the outstanding immediately balance under the Note mediately prior to foreclosure. No offset or claim which Borrower might have now or in the future against Lender shall relieve Borrower from making payments due under the Note and this Security IrroMement or performing the covenants and agreements secured by this Security instrument 2. Application of Payments or Proceeds- Fatcept as otherwise described in this Section 2, all payments accepted and applied by Lender shall be applied in the following order of priority: (a) interest due under the Note; (b)principal due under the Note; (c) amounts due under Section 3. Such payments shall be applied to each Periodic Payment in the order in which it became eke. Any remaining amounts shall be applied first to late charges, second to any other amounts due under this Security(etst omen. and then to reduce the principal balance of the Note. If Lender receives a payment from Borrower for a delinquent Periodic Payment which includes a sufficient amount to pay any late charge due, the payment may be applied to the delinquent payment and the late charge. If more than one Periodic Payment is outstanding, Larder may apply any pa received from Borrower to the repayment of the Periodic Payments if, and to the extent that, each payment can be paid in full. To the extent that any excess exists after the paynkanut i applied to the fill payment of one or more Periodic Payments, such excess may be applied to;My ate charge due. Voluntary prepayments shall be applied first to any prepayment charges and then as described in the Nor. Any application of payments, insurance proceeds. or Miscellaneous Proceeds to principal due under the Note shall not wend or postpone the due date, of change the amount, of the Periodic Payments. 1. Funds for Escrow Items. Borrower shall pay to Lender on the day Periodic Payuneets are due under the Note, until the Note is paid in full, a smnn(the'Funds") to provide for payment of amounts due for: (a) taxes and asscasmeats and other item which can attain priority over this Security Instrument as a lien or encumbrance on the Property; (b)leasehold payments or pound rents on the Property, if any; (c) premium% for any and all insurance required by Lender under Section 5; and (d) Mortgage Insurance premiums. if any. or any suss payable by Borrower to Lender in lieu of the payment of Mortgage Irnsurmrtc premiums in accordance with the provisions of Section l0. These item arc called "Escrow hacks: At origination or at an y dine during the tem of the Loan. Lender may require that Community km/elution Dues, Fees, and Assess eats, if any, by escrowed by Borrower, and such dues, fees and assessments shall be an Escrow Item. Borrower shall p.vmptly finish to Lender all notices of amounts to be paid under this Section_ Borrower shall pay Lender the Funds for Escrow Items unless Leader waive Borrower's obligation to pay the Funds for any or all Escrow Items. Lender may waive Borrower's obligation to pay to Lender Funds for any or all Escrow Items at any time. Any such waiver may only be 351-89681167 CALBORNIASingle Family-Faaide Marlrnddle Mac UNIFORM 1NtTROMtNT WITH M Form 5005 1101 VMP®4A(CA)earen) e'aaas at se MKS Al/7-ll�ept SAN BERNARDINO.CA Dacument:TD 2011.494481 Page:4 of 18 Printed on:7/24/2012 4:42 PM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 07/17 Branch :OCC,User:3600 Title Officer:00 Order:0000000 Station ID:PYHI • in writing. In the event of such waiver. Borrower shall pay directly, when and where payable, the amount; due for any Escrow Item for which payment of Funds has been waived by Lender and,if Lender requires, shall 'laugh to Lender receipts evidencing such payment within such time period as Lender may require. Borrower's obligation to make such payments and to provide receipts shall for all purposes be deemed to be a covenant and agreement contained in this Security Instrument, as the phrase"covenant and agreement' is used in Section 9. If Borrower is obligated to pay Escrow Item directly, pursuant to a waiver, and Borrower fails to pay the amount due for an Escrow Item, Lender may exercise its rights under Section 9 and pay such amount and Borrower shall then be obligated under Section 9 to repay to Lender any such amount Lender may revoke the waiver as to any or all Escrow Items at any time by a notice given in accordance with Section 15 and, upon such revocation, Borrower shall pay to Lender all Funds, mid in such amounts, that are then required under this Section 3. Lender may, at any dine. collect and hold Fund:in an amount(a)sufficient to permit Lender to apply the Funds at the time specified under RESPA, and (I,) not to exceed the maximum amount a lender can require under REEFA. Lender shall estimate the amount of Funds due on the basis of current data and reasonable estimates of expenditures of Rare Escrow Items or otherwise in accordance with Applicable Law. The Funds shall be held in an institution whose deposits tee insured by a federal agency, inatnaaenality, or entity(including Lender, if Lender is an institution whose deposits are so insured)or in any Federal Home Loan Bank. Lender shall apply the Funds to pay the Escrow Items no later than the time specified under RESPA. Leader shall not charge Borrower for holding and applying the Funds, annually analyzing the escrow account, or verifying the Escrow Items, unit,"Lender pays Borrower interest on the Funds and Applicable Law permits Leader to make such a charge. Unless an agreement is made in writing or Applicable Law requires interest to be paid on the Funds,Lender shall not be required to pay Borrower any interest or earnings on the Funds. Borrower and Lender can agree In writing, however, that interest shall be paid on the Funds. Lender shall give to Borrower. without charge, an annual accounting of the Funds as required by RESPA. If that is a surplus of Funds held in escrow, as defined under RESPA, Lender shall amount to Borrower for the excess f aids in accordance with RESPA. If there is a shortage of Fends held in escrow, as defined under RESPA,Lender shall notify Borrower as required by RESPA, and Borrower shall pay to Lender the amount nceemtry to make up the shortage in accordance with RESPA. but hi no more than 12 } monthly payments. If there is a deficiency of Funds held in=TOW, as defined under RESPA, Lender shall notify Borrower as required by RESPA. and Borrower shall pay to Lender the amount neceas ey to make up the deficiency in accordance with RESPA,but In no more than 12 monthly payments Upon payment in MI of all sums secured by this Security Instrument, Lender shall promptly refund to Borrower any Funds held by Lender. 4. Charge; Lien Borrower shall pay all taxes, assessments, charges, fines. and impositions attributable to the Property which can &min priority over this Security Instrument, leasehold payments or ground rents on the Avow ty, if any,and Community Association Does. Fes, and Assessments. if any. To the=tan that these items are Escrow Items, Borrower shall pay them in the manner provided in Section 3. Borrower shall promptly discharge any lien which has priority ova this Security Instrument unless Borrower: (a)agrees in writing to the payment of the obligation secured by the lien in a manner acceptable to Lender, but only so long as Borrower is performing such agreement (b)contests the lien in good faith by. or defends against enforcement of the lien in, legal proceedings which in Lender'a opinion operate in prevent the enforcement of the lien while those proceedings are pending, but only until such proceedings are concluded; or(c)secures from the holder of the lien an agreement satisfactory to Lender subordinating the lien to this Security tstrument. If Lender determines that any part of the Property is subject to a lien which can attain priority ova this Security Instrument, Lender may give Borrower a notice identifying the 351-89681167 CALIFORNIA-Single caraaraarmai etarernmens Mae UNIFORM INSTRUMENT WIT M Fenn 3005 1,01 VMP04A(CA)071t n r.gtaee to eau. SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document:TB 2011.494481 Page:5 of 18 Printed on:7/24/2012 4:42 FM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 08/17 Branch :OCC,User:3600 Title Officer :00 Order:0000000 Station,ID:PXII1 • lien. Within 10 days of the data on which that notice is given, Borrower shall satisfy the lien or take one or [ more of'the actions set forth above in this Section 4. Lender may require Borrower to pay a one-time charge for a real estate tax verification atnd/or reporting service used by Lender in corottetion with this Lon 3. Property Inanrance. Borrower shall keep the improvements now existing or hereafter erected on the Property insured against loss by Ere, karat included within the term "extended coverage," and any other hazards including. but not limited to, earthquakes and floods for which Lender requires insurance. This insurance shall be maintained in the amounts(ncluding deductible levels) and for the periods that Lender requires. What Lender requires pursuant to the preceding sentences can change during the terra of the Loan. The insurance carrier providing the insurance shall be chosen by Bon ewer subject to Lender's right to disapprove Borrowers choke, which right shall not be exercised unreasonably. Lender may require Borrower to pay, in connection with this Loan, either: (a) a one-time charge for flood zone determination, certification and tracking services; or (b)a one-time charge for flood zone determination mad certification services and subsequent charges each time ramming* or similar changes occur which reasonably might affect such determination or certification. Borrower shall also be renewable for the payment of any fleet imposed by the Federal Eu..,g' a-y Management Agency in comtection with the review of any flood zone determination resulting from an objection by Borrower. If Borrower fails to maintain any of the coverages described. above, Lender may obtain insurance coverage, at Lender's. option and Borrower's expense Lender is under no obligation to purchase any particular type or amount of coverage. Therefore, such coverage shall cover Lender. but might or might not protect Borrower, Borrower's equity in the Property, or the contents of the Pula,ty, against any risk, hazard or liability and might provide greater or laser coverage than was previously in effect. Borrower acknowledges that the cwt of the insurance coverage so obtained might significantly crewed the cost of insurance that Borrower could have obtained. Any amounts disbursed by Lender under this Se ctino S shall become additional debt of Borrower secured by this Security Instrument. These amounts shall bar interest at the Note rate front the date of disbursement and shall be payable, with such interest, upon notice from Lender to Borrower requesting payment. All insurance policies required by Lender and renewals of such policies shat be subject to Lender's tight to disapprove such policies, shall include a standard mortgage clause, and shall name Lender as mortgagee and/or as an additional loss payee and Borrower farther agrees to grnaatly assign rights to inamtmee proceeds to the holder of the Note up to the amount of the outstanding loan balance. Lender shall have the right to hold the policies and renewal cvtificates. If Lender require, Borrower shall promptly give to Lender all receipts of paid prc.ninn s and renewal notices. If Borrower obtains any form of insurance coverage not otherwise required by Lender, for damage to, or destruction of the Property, such policy shall include a standard mortgage clause and shall name Lender as mortgagee and/or as an additional loss payee and Borrower further agrees to generally assign rights to insurance proceeds to the bolder of the Note up to the amount of the outstanding loan balance. In the event of loss, Borrower shall give prompt notice to the insurance earlier and Lender_ Lender may make proof of loss if not made promptly by Borrower. Unless Lender and Borrower otherwise agree in writing, any insurance proceeds, whether or not the underlying insurance was required by Lender, shall be applied to restoration or repair of the Pioµw ry, if the restoration or repair is economically feasible end Lender's security is not lessened. Dining such repair and restoration period, Lender shall have the right to hold such insurance proceeds until Lender has had an opportunity to inspect such Property to ensure the work has been completed to Lender's satisfaction, provided that such inspection shall be undertaken promptly. Lender may disburse proceeds for the repairs and restoration in a single payment or in a series of progress payments as the work is completed. Unless an agreement is made in writing or Applicable Law requires interest to be paid on such insurance proceeds.Lender shall not be required to pay Borrower any interest or earnings on such proceeds. Fees for public adjusters, or other third parties, retained by Borrower shall not be paid out of the insurance proceeds and shall be the sole obligation of Borrower. If the restoration or repair is not economically feasible or Leader's security would be lessened, the insurance proceeds shall be applied to the sums secured by this Security Instrument, whether or not then dui with 351-89681167 CAUFOaNut-eirme Faeany.FanNS Matirs/stirs/Ms Mae UNIFORM IISTAUate41T WIT ME 6 Farm 3005 1/01 VMPO4A(CA)amti) aanaet.s !Ut 1 SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document:TD 2011.494481 Page:6 of iS Printed on:7/24/2012 4:42 PM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 09/17 Branch:OCC,User:3600 Title Officer:00 Order:0000000 Station ID:PYHI the nceas, if any, paid to Borrower. Such insurance proceeds shall be applied in the order provided for in Section 2. If Borrower nbandmn the Property, Lender may file, negotiate and settle any available insurance claim and related matters. If Borrower does net respond within 30 days to a notice from Lender that the insurance carrier has offered to settle a claim, then Lender may negotiate and settle the claim. The 30.day period will begin when the notice is given. In either event, or if Lender acquires the Property under Section 22 or otherwise Borrower hereby assigns to Lender (a) Borrower's rights to any insurance proceeds in an amount not to exceed the amounts unpaid under the Note or this Security Imamate; and (b) any other of Borrower's rights (other than the right to any refund of unearned premium paid by • Borrower) under an insurance policies covering the Property, insofar as such rights we applicable to the coverage of the Pr:perry. Lender may use the insurance proceeds either to repair or restore the Property or to pay amounts unpaid under the Note or this Security Instrmnenn, whether or not then due. 6. Occupancy. Borrower shall occupy, establish, and use the Property as Brrrowa's principal residence within 60 days after the execution of this Security Instrument and shall continue to occupy the { Property as Borrower a principal residence ebr at least one year after the date of occupancy. unless Lender ( otherwise agrees in writing, which consent till not be unreasonably withheld, or unless extenuating • circunntances exist which are beyond Borrower's ccmtral. 7, Preservation, Maintenance and Protection of the Property; Inspections. Borrower shall not destroy, damage or impair the PAup,..ty, allow the Property to deteriorate or w,u,u,lt wine on the Property. Whether or not Borrower is residing in the Property. Borrower shall maintain the Property in order to prevent the Property from deteriorating or decreasing in value due to its condition. Unless it is determined pursuant to Section 5 that repair or restoration is not economically feasible, Borrower shall promptly repair the Prrgn.ty if damaged to avoid fbr her deterioration or damage. If insurance or condarmation proceeds are paid in connection with damage to, or the taking of, the Property. Borrower { shall be responsible for repairing or restoring the Property only if Lender has released proceeds for such purposes. Lender may disburse proceeds for the repairs and restorative in a single payment or in a series of progress payments as the work is completed. If the insurance or codarmation proceeds are not sufficient to repair or restore the Property, Borrower In not relieved of Borrower's obligation for the completion of such repair or restoration. Lender or its agent may make reasonable entries upon and inspections of the Pivpwty. if it has reasonable coin, Lender err may inspect the interior of the improvements on the Property. Lender shall give Borrower notice at the time of or prior to such an interior inspection specifying such reasonable cane, 8. Borrower's Loan Application. Borrower doll be in default it during the Loan application proems, Borrower or any persons or entities acting at the direction of Borrower or with Borrower's knowledge or consent gave materially false, misleading, or inaccurate information or statements ro Lender (or failed to provide Lender with material Information) in tmoiniutiOR with the Loon Material representations include, but are not limited to. reprtesentations concerning Borrower's occupancy of the Property as Borrowe?s principal residence. 9. Protection of Lender's Interest in the Property and nights Under this Security Instrument. If (a)Borrower fails to perform the covenants and aincc„a.is contained in this Security Instrument (b)there is a legal proceeding that might significantly affect Lender's interest in the Property and/or rights under this Security Instrument(such as a proceeding in bankruptcy, probate, for condemnation or forfeiture for enforcement of a lien which may attain priority over this Security Instrument or to enforce laws or regulations), or (c) Borrower has abandoned the Property, that Lest may do and pay for whatever is reasonable or appropriate to protect Lender'a interest in the Property and rights under this Security Instrument, including protecting and/or assessing the value of the Property. and securing and/or repairing the Pioy,.ity. Lender's actions can include, but are not limited to: (a)paying any sums secured by a lien which has priority over this Security lttetrummk (b) appearing in Garr, and (c) paying reasonable 351-99681167 CALIFORNIA-Single Frilly-Fannie Mn/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT W ITN ME B$ Perm 3005 1101 vMPe•4A(CAI(arnm Pert ells MAW {E1 SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document:TD 2011.494481. Page:7 of 18 Printed on:7/24/2012 4:42 PM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 10/17 Branch:OCC,User:3600 _ Title Officer:OD Order:0000000 _ Station ID:PYBI attorneys' firs to protect its interea in the Property and/or rights under this Security Ire assent including its secured position in a bankruptcy proceeding. Securing the P..q.w.y includes, but is not limited to. entering the P,i,ycny to make repairs. change locks, replace or board up doors and windows, drain water from pipers, eliminate building or other code violations or dangerous conditions, and have utilities turned on or oft Although Lender may take action under This Section 9,Lender does not have to do so and is not under any duty or obligation to do so. It is agreed that Lender incurs no liability for not taking any or all actions authorized under this Section 9. Any amouns disbursed by Lender under this Section 9 shall become additional debt of Borrower secured by this Security Instrument These amounts shall bear interest at the Note rate from the date of .disbursement and shall be payable, with such interest, upon notice firm Lender to Borrower reverting If1 this Security instrument is ono leasehold, Borrower shall comply with all the provisions of the lease. if Borrower acquires fee title to the Property, the leasehold and the fee title shall not merge unless Lender agrees to the merger in writing. Lo.Mortgage Insurance.if Lender required Mortgage Insurance as a condition of maid»g the Loan, Borrower shall pay the premiums required to maintain the Mortgage Insurance in effect if, for any reason, the Mortgage insurance coverage required by Lender ceases to be available from the mortgage insurer that previously provided such insurance and Borrower was required to make separately designated payments toward the premium% for Mortgage insurance, Borrower shall pay the premiums required to obtain coverage substantially equivalent to the Mortgage tttsurtmce previously in effect, at a cost substantially equivalent to the cost to Borrower of the Mortgage Insurance previously in effect, from an alternate mortgage insurer selected by Lender. if substantially equivalent Mortgage insurance coverage is not available, Borrower shall continue to pay to Lender the amount of the separately designated payments that were due when the Moranee coverage ceased to be in effect. L,.ud..r will accept, tst and retain these payments as a ran-refundable loss reserve in lieu of Mortgage insurance. Such Ices reserve shall be non-refundable, notwithstanding the fact that the Loan is ultimately paid in full, and Lender shall not be required to pay Borrower any interest or awnings on such loss reserve. Lender can no longer require kiss reserve payments if Mortgaec Insurance coverage(in the amount and for the period that Lender requires) provided by as insurer selected by Lender again becomes available, is obtained, and Lender requires separately designated payments toward the premiums for Mortgage Insurance. If Lender required Mortgage Insurance as a condition of making the Leon and Borrower was required to make separately designated payments toward the premiums for Mortgage insurance, Borrower shall pay the premium% required to maintain Mortgage Insurance in effect, or to provide a non-refundable loos reserve. until Leader's requirement for Mortgage Insurance ands in accordance with any written agrcnarnt between Borrows and Lender providing for such termination or until termination is required by Applicable Law. Nothing in this Section IO affects Borrower's obligation to pay interest at the rata provided in the Note. Mortgage Insurance reimburses Lender (or any entity that purchases the Note) for certain losses it may incur if Borrower does not repay the Lome as agreed. Borrower is not a party to the Mortgage tnsumece. Mortgage insurers evaluate their total risk on all such insurance in force from time to time, and may ROC into agreements with otter parties that share or modify their risk or reduce losses. These agreements are on terms and conditions that are satisfactory to the mortgage insurer and the other party(or parties)to these agreements. "These agreements may require the mortgage insurer to make payments using any source of Rands that the mortgage insurer may have available(which may include Rinds obtained from Mortgage Insurance premiums). As a result of these agreements. Lender, any purchaser of the Note, another insurer, any reinsurer. any other entity. or any affiliate of any of the foregoing, may receive(directly at indirectly)amounts that derive from(err night be characterized as) a portion of Borrower's payments for Mortgage Insurance, in exchange for shoring or moditj'mg the mortgage insurer's risk, or reducing looms. if such agreement provides that an affiliate of Lender takes a share of the insurer's risk in exchange for a share of the premiums paid to the Insurer, the arrangement is often termed"captive reinsurance."further: (a) Any such agreements will not affect the amounts that Borrow has agreed to pay for Mortgage Insurance, or any otter terms of the Loan. Such agreements will not increase the amount Dempster eaten for Mortgage Insurance,and they will not entitle Borrower to any refund. 351-89681167 CALIFORmA-SMgta Pmnity-Farms UaMFrettag Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT WITH at EB Fenn 3005 1101 VMP®.6A(CA)(nrm1) Ogre,an ram SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document:TD 2011.494481 Page:8 of 18 Printed on:7/24/2012 4;42 PM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 11/17 Branch:OCC,Uscr:3600 Title Officer:00 Order:0000000 Station ID:PYHI (b) Any such agreements will not affect the rights Borrower has- If any- with respect to the Mortgage Iavuranee under the Homeowners Protection Art or 1998 or any other law. These rights may include the right to receive certain dlsdotnret, to request and obtain cancellation of the Mortgage Insurance, to have the Mortgage Insurance tenninated anmmsticafy, ond(or to receive a refund of any Mortgage [asunince premiums that were unearned at the time of sack cancdladon or termination 11. Assignment of Miscellaneous P..,...Js, Forfeiture. All Miscellatmott¢ Proceeds are la...by assigned to and shall be paid to Lender. If the Property is damaged, such Miscellaneous Proceeds shall be applied to restoration or repair of the Property, if the restoration or repair is economically feasible and Lender's security is not lessened. During such repair and restoration period. Lender shall have the right to hold ouch Miscellaneous Proceeds until Lender has had an opportunity to inspect such Property to ensure the work has been completed to Lender's setiafaaion, provided that such inspection shall be undertaken promptly. Lender may pay for the repairs and restoration in a single disbursement or in a series of progress payments as the work is completed. Unless an agreement is made in writing or Applicable Law requires interest to be paid on such • Miscellaneous Proceeds. Lender shall not be required to pay Borrower any interest or earnings on such Miscellaneous Proceeds. If the restoration m repair is not economically feasible or Lender's security would be lessened, the Miscellaneous Proceeds shall be applied to the amiss seemed by this Security instrument. whether or not then due, with the escess, if any, paid to Borrower. Such Miscellaneous Prnc..,4s shall be applied In the order provided for in Section 2. In the event of a total taking, destrtn:tion or loss in value of the Property, the Miscellaneous Proceeds shall be applied to the sums secured by this Security Instrument, whether or not then due, with the etcess, if any,paid to Borrower. In the event of a partial taking, destruction, or loss in value of the P.vp..,ty in which the fair,market value of the Property immediately before the partial taking, destnwtion, or loss in value is equal to or greater than the amount of the aunts secured by this Security Instrument immediately before the partial taking, destruction. or loss in value, unless Borrower and Lender otherwise agree in writing, the aunts secured by this Security instrument shall be reduced by the amount of the Miscellaneous Proceeds multiplied by the following fraction: (a) the total amount of the sums secured immediately before the partial taking, detraction, or loss in value divided by (b) the fair market value of the Property immediately before the partial taking, destruction,or loss in value. Any balance shall bepaid to Borrower. In the event of a partial taking, destruction, or loss in value of the Property in which the fair market value of the Property immediately before the partial taking, destruction, or loss in value is less than the amount of the sums secured immediately befbre the partial taking, denruction, Or low in value, unless Borrower and Lender otherwise agree in writing, the Miscellaneous Proceeds shall be applied to the sums secured by this Security Instrument whether or not the sums are then due. If the Property is abandoned by Borrower. or If, after notice by Lender to Borrower that the Opposing Party (as defined in the next sentence) octets to make an award to nettle a claim for damages, Borrows fails to respond to Lender within 30 days after the date the notice in given, Lender is authorized to collect and apply the Miscellaneous Preece ds either to restoration or repair of the Property or to the auras secured by this Suavity limn w..cut, whether or not than due. "Opposing Party" means the third party that owes Borrower Miscellaneous Prsn....Js or the party against whom Borrower has a right of action in regard to Miscellaneous Proceeds. Borrower shall be in default if any action or proceeding- whether civil or criminal, is begun that, in Lender's judgment could result in forfeiture of the Property or other material impairment of Lender's • interest in the Property or rights under this Security Instrument. Borrower can cure.such a default and, if acceleration has occurred, reinstate as provided in Section 19, by causing the action or proceeding to be dismissed with a ruling that, in Lender's judgment. precludes forfeiture of the Propeny or other material impairment of Lander's interest in the P.upw.y or rights under this Security Instrument. The proceeds of any award or claim for damages that are attributable to the.Impairment of Larder a interest In the Property are hereby assigned and shall be paid to Lender. All Miscellaneous Proceeds that arc not applied to restoration or repair of the P. ty shall be applied in the order provided the in Section 2. 12. Borrower Not Released: Ferbearenee By Lender Net Waiver. Extension of the time for payment or modification of amortization of the sutra secured by this Security instrument granted by Lender 3S1-89601167 CALIFORNIA-Sirgle Camay-Faunal at*wreathes Mae UNIFORM INSTRUMENT WITH 10 R9 Fenn 2006 1(01 VMP+9-6A(CA)tartlI rrrseam Naay.atr-.M ii.Q/I�LtP SAN BERNARDINO.CA Doeument:TD 2011.494481 Page:9 of 18 Printed on:7/24/2012 4:42 PM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 12/17 Branch :OCC,User:3600 Title Officer:00 Order:0000000 Station ID:PYHI to Borrower or any Succe'or in Interest of Borrower shall not eperste to release the liability of Borrower or any Successors in(merest of Borrower. Lender shall not be required to courenence proceedings against any Successor in Interest of Borrower or to refuse to extend time for payment or otherwise modity amonintion of the runts secured by this Security Insumnent by reason of any demand made by the original Borrower or any Successors in Interest of Borrower. Any forbearance by Lender in exercising any right or remedy including, without limitation, Lender's acceptance of payments from third persons, entities or Successors in Interest of Borrower or In amounts less than the arnount then due, shall not be s waiver of or preclude the exercise of any right or remedy. IS. Joint and Several Liability; Co-signers; Sustemsors and Assigns Bomn1. Borrower covenants and agrees that Borrower's obligations and liability shall be joint and several. However, any Borrower who eo-signea this Security Instrument but does not execute the Note (a "co-signer"): (a) is co-signing this Security Instrument only to mortgage, grant and convey the co-signer's interest in the Property under the terms of this Security brstremene (b) is not personally obligated to pay the suns secured by this Security Inftrumenr, and (e) agrees that Lender and any other Borrower cat agree to extend, modify, forbear or make any accommodations with t.t<wd to the terms of this Security hohument or the Note without the co-signer's coarsen. Subject to the peevisiana of Section I8, any Successor in Interest of Borrower who t,swne, Borrower's obligations under this Security instrument in writing, and is approved by Lender, shall obtain all of Borrower's rights and benefits under this Security Instrument .Borrower shall not be released from Borrower's obligations and liability under this S....rity Instrument unless Lender agrees to such release in writing. The covenants and agreements of this Security Insttianent shall bind (except an provided in Section 20)and benefit the successors and assigns of t..ender. 14. Loan Charges. Lender may charge Borrower rem for services in connection with Borrower's default, for the purpose of protecting Lag's iuh..v,t in the .Property and rights under this Security Instrument including, but not limited to. attorneys' fees, property inspection and valuation foes, In regard to any other fees, the absence of express authority in this Security Instrument to charge a specific fee to Borrower shall not be construed as a prohibition on the charging of such fee. Lender may not charge fees that are expressly prohibited by this Security Instrument or by Applicable Law. if the Lam is subject to a law which sets maximum loan abai s. and that law Ls finally innrproted so that the interest or other loan charges collected or no be collected in connection with the Loan acted the permitted limits, then: (a) any Such loan charge shall be reduced by the amount necessary to reduce the charge to the permitted limit; and(b)any stuns already collected fiom Borrower which e-n....hd permitted limits will be refimded to Borrower, Lender may choose to make this refired by reducing the principal owed under the Note or by making a direct payment to Borrower. If a refund reduces principal, the reduction will be treated as a partial prepayment without any prepayment charge (whether or not a prepayment charge is provided for under the Note). :Borrower's acceptance of any such rdlmd made by direct payment to Borrower will constitute a waiver of any right of action Burrower night have arising out of such overcharge. IS- Notices. All notices given by Borrower or Lender in connection with this Security instrument must be in writing. Any notice to Borrower in connection with this Security Instrument shall be deemed to have been given to Borrower when mailed by first class mail or when actually delivered to Borrower's notice address if seas by other means. Notice to any one Borrower shall constitute notice to all Borrowers unless Applicable Law expressly requires otherwise. The notice address shalt be the Property Address unless Borrower has designated a substitute notice address by notice to Lender. Borrower shall promptly notify Lender of Borrower'n change of address. If Lender specifies a procedure for reporting Borrower's change of ad*en. then Borrower shall only report a change of address through that specified procedure. There may be only one designated notice address ander this Security Instrument at any one time. Any notice to Lender shall be given by delivering it or by mailing it by first clans mail to Lender's address stated herein unless Lender has designated another address by notice to Borrower. Any notice in coomection with this Security Instrument shall not be deemed to have been given to Lender until actually received by Lender. If any notice required by this Security Instrument is also requited under Applicable Law, the Applicable Law requirement will satisfy the corresponding requirrrnent under this Security Instrument. 351-89661167 CALIFORNIA-Single Forney-Fannin Mea/Freddla Mae UNIFORM INSTRUMENT WITH Fenn 3005 1101 VMP7.6AICAI tell) Pelage&IS Mawr. SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document:TD 2011.494481 Page:10 of 18 Printed on:7/24/2012 4:42 PM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 13/17 Branch:OCC,User:3600 Title Officer:00 Order:0000000 Station IIh:PYHI • 16. Governing Law; SeverabIllty; Rules of Construction. This Security Instrument shall be governed by federal law and the law of the jurisdiction in which the Property is located. All right and obligations contained in this Security Instrument are subject to any requirements and limitations of Applicable Law. Applicable Law might explicitly or implicitly allow the parties to agree by contract or it might be silent, but such silence shall not be construed as a prohibition against agreement by contract In the event that any provision or clause of this Security lretrument or the Note conflicts with Applicable Law, such conflict shall not affect other provisions of this Security Instrument or the Note which can be given effect without the conflicting provision. As used in this Security Immanent (a) words of the masculine gender than tee and include corresponding neuter words or words of the feminine gender, (b)words in the singular shall mean and Include the plural and vice venue and(c) the word "may' gives sole discretion without any obligation to take any action 17. Borrower's Copy. Borrower shall be given one copy of the Note and of this Security Insvumrnt it Transfer of the Property or a Beneficial Interest In Borrower. As used in this Section IS, "Interest in the Property" means any legal or beneficial interest in the Property, including, but not limited to.those beneficial interests transferred in a bond for deed, contract for deed, installment sales contract or escrow agreement,the intent of which is the transfer of title by Borrower at a thane date to a peachnr. if all or any part of the Property or any Interest in the Property is sold or transferred(or if Borrower is not a natural person and a beneficial interest In Borrower is sold or transferred) without Lender's prior written consent, Lender may require immediate payment in 11171 of all stares secured by this Security Instrument However, this option shall not be exercised by Lender if such exercise is prohibited by Applicable Law. If Lender exercises this option, Lander shall give Borrower notice of acceleration. The notice shall provide a period of not less than 30 days from the date the notice is given in accordance with Section 15 within which Borrower must pay all wares secured by this Security Instrument If Borrower fails to pay these sums prior to the expiration of this period, Lender may invoke any remedies permitted by this Security Instrument without Anther notice or demand on Borrower. 19. Borrower's Right to Reinstate After Awoti.•ation. If Borrower meets certain conditions. Borrower shall have the right to have enforcement of this Security Instrument discontinued at any dine prior to the earliest of (a) five days before sale of the Property pursuant to any power of sale contained in this Security Instrument; (b) such other period as icable Law might specify for the termination of Borrower's right to rr�mtate: or (c) entry of a Applicable enforcing this Security Instrument. Those conditions are that Borrower: (a) pays Lender all suns which that would be due under this Security l Struts d and the Note as if no acceleration had occurred; (b)cures any default of any other covenants or agreements; (c)pays all expenses incurred in enforcing this Security instrument, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' thee property inspection and valuation ties, and other fees lectured for the purpose of protecting Lender's interest in the Property and rights wider this Security instnuncnt; and (d) takes such action as Lender may reasonably require to assure that Lender's interest in the Property and rights wider this Security Imte.ar,..et and Borrowds obligation to pay the sums secured by this Security Instfwnent, shall continue unchanged. Lender may require that Borrower pay such reinstatement sums and expenses in one or more of the following forms, as selected by Lender, (a) mash,; (b) money order; (c) codified check, bank check, traesurer's check or cashier's check, provided any such cheek is drawn upon an institution whose deposits are insured by a federal agency, lnstrmnanaliy or entity; or(d) Electronic Funds Transfer. Upon reinstatement by Borrower, this Security Instrument and obligations secured hereby shall retain fully effective as if no acceleration had occurred. However, this right to reinstate shall not apply in the case of acceleration under Section 18. 20. Sale of Note-,Change of Loan Servleer;Notice of Grievance.evance. The Note or a partial interest in the Note(together with this Security Instrument) can be sold one or more times without prior notice to Borrower, A sale might result in a change in the entity (known as the "Loan Servicer") than collects Periodic Payments due wider the Note and this Security Instnmmem and performs other mortgage loan servicing obligations under the Note, this Security Instrument, and Applicable Law. There also might be one or more changes of the Loan Scrvicer unrelated to a sale of the Note. If there is a change of the Loan Services; Borrower will be given written notice of the change which will state the name and address of the new Loan Servicer, the address to which payments should be made and any other information RESPA 352—896811 67 CALIrORNIA.Stngtee'ramify-Fannie ManIFnddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUM ENT WITH TM Form 300a 1101 VMP 941A ICA)NIN) pap I1 m» exxrw;_NS SAN BERNARDINO,CA Dosument:TD 2011.494481 Page:11 of 18 Printed nn:7/24/2012 4:42 PM • 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 14/17 Branch:OCC,User:3600 Title Officer:00 Order:0000000 Station 11):PYHI requires in connection with a notice of ranee of servicing. if the Note is sold and thermfter the Loran is serviced by a Loan Servicer other than the purchaser of the Note, the mortgage loan servicing obligations to Borrower will remain with the Loan Service+or be transferred to a successor Loan Services and are not assumed by the Nom purchaser unless otherwise provided by the Note purchaser. Neither Borrower not Lender may commence, join, or be joined to any judicial action(as either an individual litigant or the m..nnS..r of a. class) that arises from the other party's actions pursuant to this Security Instrument or that alleges that the other party has breached any provision of or any duty owed by reason of this Security.Instrument. until such Borrower or Lender has notified the other party(with such notice given in compliance with the requirements of Section 15) of such alleged breach and afforded the other party hereto a reasonable period after the giving of such notice to take corrective action. If Applicable Law provides a time naiad which must elapse before certain action can be taken, that time period will be doomed to be reasonable for purposes of this paragraph. The notice of acceleration and opportunity to are gives to Borrower pursuant to Section 22 and the notice of acceleration given to • Borrower pursuant to Section 18 shall be deemed to satisfy the notice and opportunity to take corrective action provision+of this Section 20. 21. Hazardous Substances, As used in this Section 21: (a) "Hazardous Substances' are those substances defined as toxic or hazardous substances. pollutants, or wastes by Environmental Law and the following substances: gasoline, kerosene, other flannnable or toxic petroleum products, toxic pesticides and herbicides,volatile solvents, materials containing asbestos or formaldehyde, and radioactive materials: (b)"Environment,'Law"mesa federal laws and laws of the jurisdiction where the Property is loaned that relate to health, safety or environmental protection•, (e) "Environmental Cleanup" includes any response action, remedial action, or removal action, as defined in Environmental Law: and(d) an "Environmental Condition" means a condition that can cause, contribute to of otherwise trigger an Environmental Cleanup. Borrower shall not cause or permit the presence, use, disposal, storage, or release of any Hazardous Substance'. or threaten to release any Hazardous Substances, on or in the Property. Borrower shall not do, nor allow anyone else to do, anything affecting the Property(a)that is in violation of any Environmental Law, (b)which crates an Environmental Condition, or(c)which, due to the presence tae, or release of a Hazardous Substance, creates a condition that adversely affects the value of the Property. The preceding two sentences shall not apply to the presence, use, or storage an the Property of small quantities of Hazardous Substances that ate generally recognized to be appropriate to named residential uses and to maintenance of the Pe yr..y(including,but not limited to, hazardous substances in consumer products). Borrower shall promptly give Lender written notice of(a)any investigation, claim, demand, lawsuit or other action by any governmental or regulatory agency or private party involving the Rearrest and any Hazardous Substance or Environmental Law of which Borrower lug actual knowledge, (b) any Environmental Condition,including but not limited to, any spilling,leaking, discharge. release or threat of release of any Hazardous Substance, and (e) any condition caused by the presence, use or release of a Hazardous Substance which adversely affects the value of the Property. If.Borrower Mama, or is notified by any governmental or regulatory authority, or any private party, that any removal or other iw,x denier of any Hazardous Substance affecting the Property is necessary, Borrower shall piornptly take all necessary remedial actions in accordance with Environmental Law. Nothing herein shall create any obligation on Lender for an Environmental Cleanup. 331-896811.67 CALIFORNIA-Simla Forney-roam Maatrraddls Mae UNIFORM INSTRUMENT WW TH M S Form 3006 1101 vine-sAtcaltm,rt a.o.,t ells umnr, SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document:TD 2011.494481, Page:12 of 18 Printed on:7/24/2012 4:42 PM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 15/17 Branch:OCC,User:3600 Title Officer:00 Order:0000000 Station ID :PYIIl HON-UNIFORM COVENANT'S.Borrower and Lender nether covariant and apt as follows: 22. Acceleration:Remedies. Lender shall give notice to Borrower prior to acceleration following Borrower's breach of any covenant or agreetnent in this Security Pasnvment (but not prier to acceleration under Section IS union Applicable Law provides otherwise). The notice shall specify:(a) the default;(b)the action required to cure the default.(c)a dine, not less than 30 days from the date the notice is given to Borrower. by which the default mum be cured: and (d)that failure to ewe the default on or before the date specified in the notice may resit in acceleration of the stun secured by this Security Instrument and sale of the Property. The notice shall bhrther inform Borrower of the right to rdnatete after seceleratlon and the right to bring a court action to assert the lion-existence of a default or any other defense of Borrower to acceleration and sale. If the default is not cured on or before the date specified in the noticee.Lender at its option may require immediate payment In fall of all sums secured by this Security Instrument without further demand and may invoke the power of sale and any other remedies permitted by Applicable Law. Lender shall be entitled to collet all expenses Marred in pursuing the remedies provided in this Section 22. including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys'fees and costs of title evidence. If Lender invokes the power of sale.Lender shall execute or cause Trustee to execute a written notice of the occurrence of an event of default and of Lender's election to mace the Property to be sell Trustee shall cause this notice to be recorded in each county In which any part of the Property is located. Lender or Trustee shall mail Copies of the notice as prescribed by Applicable Law to Borrower and to the other persons prescribed by Applicable Law. Trustee shall give public notice of tale to the persona need in the manner prescribed by Applicable Law. After the time required by Applicable Law, Trustee, without demand on Borrower, shall sell the Pt vin.,ty at public auction to the highest bidder at the time and place and under the terms designated in the notice of sale in one or more parcels and in any order Trustee determines. Trustee may postpone sale of all or any parcel of the Property by public announcement at the time and place of any previously scheduled sale. Lender or its designee may purchase the Property at any sale. Trustee shall deliver to the purchase Trustee's deed conveying the Property without any covenant or warranty, expressed or implied. The recitals in the Trustee's deed shall be prima facie evidence of the troth of the statements made therein. Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sale in the following order: (a)to all expenses of the sale, including, but not limited to,reasonable Trustee's and attorneys' fees: (b) to all sums secured by this Security Instrument; and(c)any excess to the puma or persons legally entitled to it. 23. Reconveyance. Upon payment of all nuns secured by this Security Instrument. Lender shall request Trustee to reconvey the Prey.,ty and shall surrender this Security Instrument and all notes evidencing debt secured by this Security Instrument to Tnettec. Trustee skull mammy the Piuy.aty without warranty to the person or persons legally entitled to it Lender tray charge such person or persons a reasonable fee for recorweying the Property, but only if the fee is paid to a third party (such as the Trustee) for services rendered and the charging of the fee is permitted under Applicable Law, If the fee charged does not exceed the fee set by Applicable law, the fee is conclusively presumed to be reasonable. 24. Substitute Trustee. Lender. at Its option, may from time to time appoint a successor trustee to any Ttuntte appointed hereunder by an inurement esteemed and acknowledged by Lender and recorded in the office of the Recorder of the county in which the Property is located. The instrument shall contain the name of the original Lender. Trustee and Borrower, the book and page where this Security Instrument is recorded and the name and address of the succor mister. Without conveyance of the Property. the successor rune shall succeed to all the title, powers and duties conferred upon the Trustee herein and by Applicable Law, This procedure for substitution of trustee shall govern to the exclusion of all ether provisions for substitution. 25. Statement of Obligation Pee. Lender may collect a fee not to exceed the maxinwm amount permitted by Applicable Law for furnishing the statement of obligation an provided by Section 2943 of the Civil Code of California. 9{1{ 351-99661167 CAUFORNIA-Stngpe Family-Pan/ft MnolFroddle Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT WITH M Fan,3005 1101 VMPS4A(CA)luau} Paola et 13 .lei SAN BERNARDINO,CA DocumentTB 2011.494481 Page:13 of 18 Printed on:7/24/201.2 4:42 PM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 16/17 Branch:OCC,User:3600 Title Officer:00 Order:0000000 Station ID • The undersigned panwwer requests that a copy of any Notice of Default and any Notice of Sale=dm, this Security inn*rtmlent be mailed to the Borrower at the address set Forth above. A copy of any Notice of • Default and any Notice of Sale will be sent only to the address contained in this recorded recta If the Borrower's address changes, a new request most be recorded. BY SIGNING BELOW, Borrower accepts and agrees to the terns and covenants contained in this Security Instrument and in any Rider exea#ed by Borrmves and recorded with it. Witnesses: +M�11�/IMw, (Sad) GEORGE HAREM •Berrower Italy (Seal)L .LOURDES A. E AHZO .nmomer (Seal) (Seal) anent -Bonodor (Sea) (Scat) -Bom,fl i (Seal) - (Sad) -Bomrwoe -Bomfncr 951-89681167 CALIFORNIA-Single Fatally-Fannie Mai/Freddta Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT WITH MERS Form 3085 1101 VMPM cAICA)(ar111 Pine 14 of 15 SAN BERNARDINO,CA Doeument:TD 2011.494481 Page:1.4 of 18 Printed on:7/24/2012 4:42 PM 07/25/2012 05:26 9096469218 STAPLES PAGE 17/17 Branch:OCC,User:3600 Title Officer:00 Order:0000000 Station ID:PYRI • State of California county of giyei-sid tl, e i - on NOY 3 7011 beforeme. ,Jegg./Ca cimon, Plty Pub!FC. George ma-mo anal Laiu-des 141 - i arn-o . who proved to Inc an the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons)whose mmne(a)-+dare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that betdr/they executed the same in t,tUCr/their authorized capocity(.ies), and that by hiothoetheir signature(s)on The inarument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. 1 certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. w1714ESS my band and official seat j'" ^•y' 16S A88 _ -9 e z / (Sea) ' 4 COMM. •1981984 M,l Catania Riverside County Venom, Fra51 i?�2015i • 3St-89681167 catiPantna.stngte PennyFannio MaoiFroddit Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT WITH Fran 3005 1701 VMPe4A(CA)mt.II Pain t5 of It MtbAk SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document:TD 2011.494481 Page:15 of 18 Printed on:7/24/2012 4:42 PM CITY RAI CHO CUCAMONGA Neighborhood Petition To Stop SCI Funeral Nome File Number DRC2011-01094 & 01094D _ a 4, , J_UL 2 5 2012 -,:.t, a s 1,1, .t k 4' This funeral home would change-the tone and ambiance of the neighbor ten tie ve nd . - � would have a deleterious impact. Please sign this petition`and let your v r_ - No. Date Name Address Comments Signature 711c A/aw ;fall 1t2-3o 6o14rt le,. « L 2 - -74A L.,Foidifr Ti 0 vi 1,4ll civet ,;_e Id ct 9Vcd 7/1St LS IUUUU/ t.4e,-i 644 12-V0 6 01a/Q e V�,� 7i�/IL (11-14'0 LI 1430 cto Ili 4L1 7/�A 1 Lcit a..q 13.--uu ,3 st`-0 C41", /� Jam, `1I2N -N.60 Lu via_ `1531 Sic-hi �� . �1- t ,' zS a Lu ri.A 153) Exburt Pt Pa'' ;' • 112s Gv(I"I+ tUI6U(- 75_3) cx wi Pl . e1►/ -�•r�; 7� '� C rt ,2Pc 6 T/c/lFe✓ l �d' S MU[/ ✓ _I, /C/fe✓fflo I I 74gd 'n e z 9Z `11739 1 A'- 03),,,t- \-*-- p r 74s- kbuir,',,,z_ e 1 t 30, b64\-k\A"5-k - ,\ ,,SL(S At. 1-,41€,-,c4— , ��`� , IS V( i µwcIc..%4 (-cc OF Ntrie)eavE 3o4,e-A _ / %�) (}-ea_ -Net C&- c, 4110 L. _ /z( YU-QA-tk RWtJV L Lt _J ✓.7N‘ \ )0,,..4- ., \--- ala ,7 A2y4.cµen &/aaaa� Will h�rovz-l-o I is win- "- s;/v.r 12ose cr W / /�„„ �2Ny4 Irvr grkD. Jot ,vt di .4-r fie_ Q/f 2f ti1016 5 W e' �? h0 �D -p tI Subs f f arm` lll�����2 `�F(F/v/r tAb (� s Vl 1 u Inc-C--Q ��i ° G`°�. 4�/ 2 Co woliP16 - __ r--R, �. Irc.«. V u;Csh4n. la°fa3Colonut1 122nv¢✓ Dr �`3i Y ALk `m-A--R1t t.. '' :2G 1 e, list. `I \ ill Neighborhood Petition To Stop SCI Funeral Home �y File Number DRC2+�0i11-01094 & 01094D ''i .+xa '4C}�:.ag µms.k 'W.. .._ 5 Y-c 'f p a't"44r [ ^. •ryi L. �r �1�+.. kdL;,. °''-Me ir- - j�- . �# °+? '. *f '''.- ' r II"'. a. 1ra+F This funerall homeawould change thetone and ambiance of the:neighborhood.Threaten tthh�a enclave and= would:have a deleteriousim•act.,Plea"sesi•n,this,•etitionandlet our_voice-be,heard. r#- e t " No. Date Name Address Comments Signature / _ Ck, l�.q V c)Qam4f t+ 7 as W-32411--\t i ciA c.(�..3 '` Mt) f (rh 7R I X391 ; -. rte. -, 144.. f It-Ft 0.4415 Le DUO S 7 r , ( 3L Pte, ("ken I� °�1�3ti le /114 rrz' ys /L/fl G oLIIEA/ WII-_ y,r. R. c . .✓o -Sr/ ,� `Ii s ' . Ova _ 71as tcrow� ipts a N 0 SC. ' - 0 �. rnuteNy n f *14 c•4 ( I h (-9- at I ta-a �u i� P NO 5G ivy Q1 q-3i 1 mi. �97 o 62"Ri Q ell- IIII 74 £I ' ✓1aaahw ea a �t/0 5CI i11 i 173 7 , isda- . sr 12 L. r I P 1 ii i I riP''. C4)5-t- 7/X4en R 46-., Ap cr1 In 2/237 6:19--frtnic v�79 away L �iee� „..5C1-./n 91 119 /k, ( 43._ 4 w roc., No Sc ( r of 9q39 1 ' - 714y2 Scl,ov&e. ccQ.cIC ci- .1 24' tce 02cL Gm ) Scj. I in 9 x`039 -� _ i �Z� oFF /29/ 6di N. Cj; LE It m , SC/ /ti irn C 1--3,op 0_,H atQ r 7 Z S /1// 14-4,20 / v s • A: 7 .2 s +n- -�- "7 s t2 ' C9 . r I. Vim- Oak- 1�/arn e- 9 ZL7 ToCIA e UJ I31 Pc-\',',.'Q` 1\105C7 ;� `11131 Rck_eLo 71A miff) amoctiteldvtiv uovohLb gaecitutv\i5,1 f� /4- Neighborhood Petition To Stop SCI Funeral Home 4 File Number DRC2011-01094 & 010940 4A ? j R' � tiJ .. f 4E, 444 t .a R II-� 'K ai rp Y' y :4 7 :t T r {, - py x -r4 e „i ... @ht 4 wk f4-C? -df f94, 4"49d-nt .- This furier"al home would Chan ge the tone and ambiance'of the neighborhood-it-Threaten the enclave and would have a deleterious im•act..Please si.nthis •etition and It our voice be!.h ear d. 4 et x sT-" No. Date N me Address Comments Signat _ 7/Z h` 1 139 _ k ti I 0 71a5 ukf tra ( e1 tr&twvr l Alo -Pent e 07 i 61 eA 74-- 1A). '�Y vLacc ‘I 'S 5C°Crau rei loo kiv t) �m 3z3s JO/ i 7, _ (mot i wk ev, Nfl scZ iiii 98j /z_s_ A- 6 Neighborhood Petition To Stop SCI Funeral Home File Number DRC2011-01094 & 01094D This'funeral home would change the tone and ambiance:of the neighborhood Threaten the enclave and would have a°deleterious im•act. Please si.n this •etition and let 'our voice be heard:4 -4 b'`i' No. Date Name ; Address Comments Signature 71ftlasa 7338 wttvwij 19 ckAz � Pk/14 Ar� r,„ -.4, Soy..„,� , J Lc, 126- T-TAG!,-19.rictAk.444• 7v1/4/6SANLiont. AD _Alv\sLaco,Q fteivikt 1 ,-dre91. •-7 `�tml Iac Qk"w( • nS4- Nu I`'4 ,C h �0 40I I`' . /1� turf 15 ?AA- ow,4al cup-v.-tit-� d1 705 -51"-rof ic t..) 4.- / ie 7I.t c c1,a RCH tote M �✓ /6)\-14C-- /���rtiEL Y5 rv'c'2 -� - 0,01 iksl G 1331 511e 310...m litNms usE oF• ?Ica-Portz �r S,-rc . NtiIsfooce . 6EiVEFITS A� ye) 4.4 Neighborhood Petition To Stop SCI Funeral Home File Number DRC2011-01094 & 01094D Thisfuneral,home would change the tone and ambiance of the�neighb orhood Threaten the enclave and 1 vrould have a deleterious,iniact Please si•ri-this •etition,and let our voiceobe:heard' * '� �. * No. Date Name Address Comments Si ur Its Q cocf solo Nk o Prt0n- tN� V n . Neighborhood Petition To Stop SCI Funeral Home File Number DRC201�'1u-01094 & 01094D r 4R'� rte Ira I +ELL" .o - sfr 'sue.... ss!' '..c 14;'F-E.; This funeral home would change the:tone and.ambiance of the ne ghborhood Threatenithe enclave'and would;.have a deleterious im:act.=Please si•n thisi•etition"and let, ourvoice_be heardntaTar. ; No. Date Name Address a Comments Si ature 11)5 3tel:LratiAiti rAirt4)141(14) Taltk35CArk e,110115 QC-2.0Atitt- C))0C.At. X26 _ m i i�rZn h `)©o rrurc6� ��a ir r dy X1/'7 31j 1-90 st ��r,rz}-t u�Atic�ti `7/ T4'fei LL 14 20 Ce4wauf N h CA4-re0 eAncl,Jc.oc,—,..,N �� �� �� 71 re' 14-se ' cso \NA_y qQJ&Ce /en, ff7,Hotvciea / e n iP, 1739 /v o ti. .,,i,ce- 7/ (y acl4>lo'le 7372 ,,ra,fa ow( �,, e v t v t le- p c- q /7 At /v o (� '�, Lanni G. i3b ( ,tai iCvur-I- r '7ias I hoote-ra &c ,cm ,1 I-739 ' A 7 eUrolyn 7967 eraUFD¢/10 1 Yh�ra. 2c, CA 91739 Aid 9?).4-4_19 ' 1f l I r 0.—) ' / , (n-t '%( 942D At boy LA/ niot igneJ)L fb 4t it/W BR7Jt ' / ' L.-v. Rc, c.A all s " 140a5:01/6 f'a Gore .e �� ' Qi„ IZ�y �" eb - der - Ielz . „Li t , w ,,[[ !� ° CA9. 9 ,-ys. "t,.,! b� O� I 7Z/ D Rw 4C 115 ctc' ' /n' urA�ar( 'D��pUn jy��{�A/ . l!��p 1I1c bald ao Ro°r t5 a'7 l ) NO FC10 AL I/O7 /&j drac9 Ny a J�4o I3saaB �o�J I ' o / O o iZ 7fi 5 4J,ek. C 14-'- TI K N a / 136:1D v a v(tc,f 7 Al o (nj! .1ILS �('h a�"7n 156" 641 nUl i l I\)0 In/c&7 �// tinOl (M)? koff( er S I 4 7I ffAi 4 (Al IIP44icT /J 0 T, ,.f 1 - 7 y °E,;. ce- set i i) L'" A r,",, ,>7)1 atoi,4( 5g k(. 'Ti' 40-5/ .. ,/ - ca b';11 I YAP P"4 pewtovlt-5 iq -frit5 1 Neighborhood Petition To Stop SCI Funeral Home File Number DRC2011-01094 & 01094D .i. 2i srd. iP,j" , R P 'l 1l._Ln g' L.iIRi d/ .8 , This'funeral homegwould�change thejto and ambiance of the neighborhood Threaten the enclave and would`have a deleterioustim:aet. Pleasoii•n;this•etition and letourtvoice!be'heard: , e . No. Date Name Address Comments Siq�nature C7-2 iir.4ldrs 12934, BoeikolocoAv; 'De - O-1-AL.S C pttA (!yb 12- Citere.z 9.0ce,,e...a \A-eve-to-Ail LOI Ct jt to vzlie5 &4C t, hr- 7�j M/M' ifl&b1 Lc, DR. "b tooT r, iFSr a_'I-hisLoCtt$rcY,( a •/ ' AzL. Mdineat 6/MLM ►) r I . 7,, �.� •1 7s/o. a•/p. />o no5IW4n f �1*z;,s Ntre , l 15 ws// W I ��. __A-ref 7Y-36 o 3G Soo-no- Gvea c5�ain1 7 fits ' 1000 9 C✓gile-cf, 2C.V7)f icl BUSrh • tt 114 o-u., Neifht14 e 7/ 1 qr),�h e3ie cild z t Do 110 + wCi i'1 f 0i+ (o cell oh ' ' A u F91ghoc �-/ `I(73 `� C '�e Dcun nve- l 13N S&vim,v . A.: an •11-e_ Cc• %4St cb h o 1) '-1noU,1 CGaek CuuLrt -Q 73y -A cy, r- -r-c-{ kol^ 7/ 0tA, 7/ 4/74mn 'Zfif/ !�✓Fiteayerj Pcroori✓/fire 1 kc loe#c /T t, L5 /canes ,(iAee,6 raca-na/acoi./"///Mr'e 404€91 da44e viw. 1 Cu/ SECG ne. (2'P4 cetc S Ni a t\ Incin\l . --� 7� liI Lit (>%h! 4a14/ q &l ' liens , C� � �RC NI /LAX% /- Eke'tlCa9E Dr/�/ rtisa ak"..; ct r �7/ s th,-;-,son Cn.., Lt, c,c'931 - i 30 ko,m, ■. 11 ' i y " sm - or 4.L /L5 _ J aCVO Yoh At,* e- rrnai S a\ go owo�4ka5 L c 1✓ . 1ac 3I t.uQc aG-} . . �j' / On SI,', IUD jC/1 2 ,Y -. S r 8431Xc 5J Plc ln- �b fiSoc mME-� 4k-1;2- No sc _,- 111, by co, gest ill 3t f✓errw�C1- r. 1 CNrtQ�q 1 JL 4,./ , / bin 2S On.'snr --on .e. Jam- I D-g9fa Rik/ /02.5 AUSSey CT IV 0 U(iQAc1Q \ `S Spy 7/ yv�ss LA/i CAI r^n. r ' /Y (J .5 t- i Mq -71to-1 Tnnf ,, // /� � 7/2C 71<ali w / No 5 cz �-Ci(?, S- ' -7/L.- 6,17/e , , y __- . 1 II) )/ . Its /1z/'-- Neighborhood Petition To Stop SCI Funeral Home 4:2L°"eC7er7 &g-- ii-- yp File Number DRC:�2R0�T11-01094 & 01094D -4 5 itt . $? tm :r $"IPFP�' tritin �ry it s tt r �'.4ei- . OM; This,funerall_hhome would change the tone{andambiance of•the neighborhood Threaten th eenclave and, would have•a=deleterious-im•actiP..lease'si••n this etition�:and.let our•voice be heard e' * i 4: a" No. Date Name Address Comments Signatur �°�� 12 125 QUG 11 C1-- 14(Vtitseral0A ansci EY3 SCI In 91-i3q /�//�� :f bou Io5 1?`12s QUOIT 1c' �,p� 1q-S �u 611131 f, NO 3c 1 1 n 11113 9 A21)66 4 ,(1 ILIWlIc 1X0125 v(UAII L}- SC1 , \a, UJ °I1'13q N� n oti739 "C(41N1C . 1 $04( rkV I yg-041 I-uNn 0tr\- N0 SC 111-get ,r► s1� �13 7' 7 d use . ' r • $ �� rms � ✓'vuT - SAP %• / ie ' e zs IKEn Pr� ' ..1-) X114 No Sci ;in 5i7-3� / ���: e 7 /77F 7sa BRA,yAfct& f7S S e■hcg gi7�9 N SCi jr 9 )737 4 14otl<IS 45/�FI- „souqOt- Z3 'tic 2 Re ury loo sc/ `ts, 11739 Itithecot //a re-5 Afa / (L� /74 -� c. c,�S ha sts+„ > �^'\ ;`T I F,Ls-,P--1-.'!e-^ A101 • 13 06.( - . '7 � k-m5 14165 CVS1° die p$) S I (\ 91759 lit .00lto '�523130&16.�ib� � is\r-mtrego iit .aw.H. drtm'o'1 0 PT le 9 ■1-39 l/ ' 1t'6t/i�p 'I,1 7� b2 75,3 y 0,,�,.,.) ptr�"ri ( 'Cha CVCO n.,.nc No scr 1 r' c 173 9 N&L5o�-1 iLg43 emera4L.a 11 1/14 ChrAY ac,cA - 9113.1 Pa f417 5C2 I1 x1'1301 M 7 A de- S(tit 1413 7iLLn or ,r6. < L I 1 3q �Y� Q.c. CA 9n31 , ;vt ' 11 I a I� \flea e�gan� earS---.3, w.ur�y o t"1 ��� � yrna'1 Y.C” . 41139 Dr ti G 1 �� 9 3 °( G'1 rc 0. \2Sg3 qt r \ ` ' e "/73 San r'1"cZ Qavtah,c ClincA a` N6 J C-1 � °l l 7 °I , i 91131 n Ili Neighborhood Petition To Stop SCI Funeral Home File Number DRC2011-01094 & 01094D >Cfi"� 3. -@. r j Z1a 119'3 4-I AL1 :. 1' '.. c2. Irb,l y,�4 r-1Vas-ty� y. �4 a.+e -. 2r.-werf -1--1 , -d .a. ^I' .-4;.,- q y-r F d ? y a' ^",e -1, Ir,. a C x u-' “'I tl4 A t(J,_�— a ' ` t - This funeral home would change the tone and ambiance of the neighborhood. Threaten the enclave and, would have a deleterious m.act: Please si•n this •etition and let''our voice be heard." r.1;r.- re- s ;f' No. Date Name Address Comments Signature _ 434 Molly 7331sndby PhO5 r ( 4oie. /7aG�y�IG� CAsieduk25 A.c. /�0 7vUe/a Pavia 7131 Sheiyy �faft' (` r ( 7‘57 Pavia S�El�adof /\G' PO fw&ro-+ Acne a 7/=s /a%U24t. Yap, fa 8/5" 601 44-19-4 R.C. Nn lum.t-kea. K e- t� a» 7g x41 � Y �.c o` N o f...v,,..c �. � �F9sG J ills 1af�5 T I0 1304401007t Nb rarON�3C L,l JO e. 12$ $3 Cie anot DS 1/41et� rli6Sonthe7, kc_c11)3c1 7/ 2 e A/ew f v.. - , ��,� ejnco6 I/556 (4.aj 1/� S olcz pug c +. No a� TUnaxl hcn(�( le II,�/ i/,- dor 74_ tse4co, kz...q-,-(3 64 cal-" L.) r\ ) fAt9 Lc�( �' I'1,.G. nci y0-1\0 7( tJ 4 (LC ICJ Vuuk r.D Cc- ' . 'S 74- kpoi ',Laity 86.1(8P. kJ' 0 --(A )e rciA4 - rf, ,__\. 1 ,k , IVatalso . P14-'4 3 694/\ n1 r7/l &fr.�ar. I : 6 Cer/•S M 0114 K ' r I FIJI �i K,>" N° Riviera( alas Nctor?Irr ' c,'w a D \ � 0 /I is v to EA n& \&u, I e 1T 6 Page 1 of 1 Villenas, Fabian From: The Dahler Team [dick @thedahlerteam.com] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 3:52 PM To: City Council Subject: [SPAM] Mortuary Please forward this to all the city council members. I don't understand why each of you do not have a method for us to contact you without a general e-mail. Makes no sense I can e-mail my senator, my congressman, even Bob Dutton and Mike Morrell, I cannot e-mail our city council? Anyway, you all know me as like most of you, I have been in this city almost all my life. Dennis,you all your life. You have never heard me express my thoughts over a proposed business in our city, as there is probably no one more pro business then I as business owners in this city since 1977. (Remember the old Hembree Realty at the A-frame on Foothill Blvd) By the way, Dennis I know you knew Mack Hembree, he is doing well financially as a pawn broker, but is battling prostate cancer. Both Nova and I are really upset over the Mortuary project for our city. The mortuary that is being proposed next to Etiwanda Gardens should not be allowed. I don't know how we can stop it, other than express our thoughts. I live just a few blocks from the site. (A block North of Victoria Gardens) How this issue was even allowed to go to planning is beyond me, as having a mortuary in a residential neighborhood is so out of line with the master planning of this great City. As some of you know, our office, which is the biggest real estate firm in the City, is located in Victoria Gardens. We also have offices in Beverly Hills and Newport Beach. We would happy to have 100 realtors show up at your next city council meeting, if that would help. We will be signing a petition opposing the Mortuary at our staff meeting. Diane, and Dennis have been at our staff meetings in the past and that is very much appreciated. If any of you would like to come and share your thoughts regarding this, we would love to have you, and you will see firsthand how your citizens are opposed to this plan. I would appreciate your thoughts, my e-mail is dick @thedahlerteam.com Dick Dahler, Broker/owner All Nations Realty 12505 N. Mainstreet Suite 240 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91739 909-980-5000 909-645-6600 Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7323 (20120723) The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com 7/25/2012 A ' g Villenas, Fabian From: stacysfu [stacysfu @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 11:47 AM To: City Council Subject: Email for L.Dennis Michael Dear Mayor, My name is Stacy Fu. I am resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Actually, I just moved in this pretty city in July 2011. My house is near Victoria Garden shopping Mall and Perdew elementary school.It's very convenience and quiet area and That 's really good environment for my family. But recently, my neighbor told me a bad news regarding building funeral home between Etiwanda Ave and Candlewood St. I really oppose this project .not only house value but also the feeling ( the dead people living next my door. ) that feeling is really bad " I pursue a good environment for family, so I moved in this good area and beautiful city. If the city council approve this project, this environment doesn't suit for my neighbors and my family anymore! ! Unfortunately, we may plan to move out this city and sell our house. I don't want to sell my new house. . . . Hope our city council can make a good decision for us! ! Best Regards, Stacy Fu DOD iPhone CO Page 1 of 1 Villenas, Fabian From: Chris Ikeanyi [ibeto2l @verizon.netj Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:37 PM To: City Council Subject: No To SCI Funeral Home In Our Neighborhood Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dear Honorable Members, I wish to plead for your support in voter No the SCI Funeral Home project in our neighborhood. As a father of four young children, we do not want the incessant human and auto traffic associated with building a funeral home in our family oriented neighborhood. Please, help us by voting no to this project which will end up lowering our property value. Respectfully, Christopher and Chimezie Ikeanyi "For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others." - Nelson Mandela • 7/25/2012 /1 —74- �� Page 1 of 1 Villenas, Fabian From: Chris Ikeanyi [ibeto21 @verizon.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:46 PM To: City Council Subject: Fwd: No To SCI Funeral Home In Our Neighborhood Dear Honorable Members, I wish to plead for your support in voting No for the SCI Funeral Home project in our neighborhood. As a father of four young children, we don't want the incessant human and auto traffic associated with building a funeral home in our family oriented neighborhood. Please, help us by voting no to this project which will end up lowering our property value. Respectfully, Christopher and Chimezie Ikeanyi Residents of Rancho "For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others." - Nelson Mandela 7/25/2012 4 a Page 1 of 1 Villenas, Fabian From: fjou923197 @aol.com Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:32 PM To: City Council Cc: FJou923197 @aol.com Subject: No Funeral Home around our residential Dear Mayer: I am Rancho Cucamonga resident and just moved two years ago. Our family like Rancho Cucamonga because it is a great city with good environment and nice residential with safe and comfortable community. We DO NOT WANT any Funeral Home around our residential area especially so close to school district. Please Please NO to Funeral Home built approved in our beautiful home area!!! We strongly oppose to this project in Etiwanda area!!! We need your support!!! Thanks, Best regards, Frank Jou 12811 Crestfield Ct Rancho cucamonga, CA 91739 909/268-4821 • 7/25/2012 d Page 1 of 1 • Villenas, Fabian From: Jose F. Torres [torresjose73 @hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:34 PM To: City Council Subject: Cocerned Citizen of Rancho Cucamonga against CSI Funeral Home Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Honorable Mayor Michael, I would like to urge you to take action against the proposed CSI funeral home that it is under public comment with the Planning Commission. We have formed a group of concerned citizens against this proposal and we are planning to attend the Planning Commission meeting tonight; I hope you are able to attend and hear what the voters have to say about this project. We are planning on media to be there with us as well. Rancho Cucamonga should not be in the news in this way; it is a beautiful place and with a family atmosphere and we need to keep it that way. However, we feel this is the only way we will be able to defeat this proposal. I would like to invite you to visit our website as well http://www.facebook.com/ProtectRancho. We hope that you can attend and help us in this battle to protect Rancho. Jose F.Torres Concerned citizen and voter. 7k 7/25/2012 Page 1 of 1 Villenas, Fabian From: Jenifer Molineux [Jenifer @jenifermolineux.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:44 PM To: City Council Subject: RE: Chuck Buquet&Sam Spagnolo Importance: High With elections looming in the fall, I would like to say,that we need some backing about STOPPING the sale of the horrendous funeral home project on Etiwanda Avenue! We need you both to attend and defend our rights as community friends and neighbors. Listen to us and side with the majority, not the stinking business of funeral services that could inflict our neighborhood with traffic, congestion, and sigma of deceased individuals in our backyards. Try to put yourselves in our shoes and see how you would feel, PLEASE! THERE ARE PLENTY OF VACANT FIELDS AWAY FROM OUR BEAUTIFUL NEIGHBORHOODS that can accommodate their services. And, please don't underestimate that we don't see the potential of the same said company buying up Etiwanda Gardens and turning it into a cemetery! We have all thought of that also. I know you want our votes this November, so put your clout where it will really count and you will have respect from the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga. Don't spoil it for us or yourselves. Thank you for listening. Please come tonight at 7PM and you will hear more Sincerely, Jenifer Molineux "blessed are those who can give without remembering and take without forgetting." —Elizabeth 5ibesco 7/25/2012 Jul 25 12 02:28p D AQUINO 909-463-4956 p.1 July 24, 2012 Mike Smith Planning Department, City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: SCI Funeral Services, Inc. Dear Mike, My name is Demetrio Aquino, and I live on Crawford PI. in the neighborhood of the planned SCI Funeral Home. I am writing this letter to oppose such a development for the following reasons: First of all,the neighborhood consists of many children, including mine, who play around the neighborhood at all hours of the day, especially on weekends, riding bikes, scooters, playing ball, etc. The increased traffic through our neighborhood will jeopardize their safety. Secondly,the ongoing real estate downturn has already forced many homeowners in our community to lose their homes to foreclosure and short sales causing values to plummet. Having a funeral home in our backyard will most likely cause more homes to depreciate in value. Everyone, not just the homeowners, lose in this situation because the tax revenue to the city and county will further decline. Lastly,the piece of land of proposed project will best suit the neighborhood and the community as a park or open space in which we can all enjoy. I strongly believe having some sort of open, grassy area with trees,or a park will add to the aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood and to the city as a whole. I recommend that SCI and the city of Rancho Cucamonga to look at another location such as Arrow Hwy., Sixth and Fourth Streets, or Haven Ave. There are plenty of empty lots there and are in the commercially zoned areas. Please help us keep our neighborhood from deteriorating by relocating the proposed funeral home elsewhere. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 4 Demetrio Aquino, Concerned resident CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUL 25 2012 RECEIVED - PLANNING ,Peace eD/ 7 Hezron and Victoria Mchenya 7540 Crawford Place Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91739 July 24,2012 Planning Department CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 JUL 2 4 2012 RECEIVED - PLANNING Dear Sir/Madam Ref: Objections to the Funeral Home Proposal As the heading above indicates, being a resident next to the proposed area for this project, I and my wife are objecting this proposal for the following reasons: 1. Social reasons:A funeral home in an existing residential area will bring a negative psychological and eventually physical impact by changing the social view of our neighborhood. I am sure one of the reasons me and my wife and many other residents chose to live in this neighborhood was because of many positive socially attractive elements that already existed in the place. It will be very unfair for the city to bring a negative element to our neighborhood after we have invested so much to have what we already have now. We ask the city to keep the reputation of Rancho Cucamonga of which includes our neighborhood. 2. Financial reasons: It is needless to say that the property value of our homes will inevitably go down. This is a reason for many to start moving out because we cannot continue investing in a city that does not promote the value of the homes of its residence. By passing this proposal,the city will be looking at one small investment and overlooking what makes Rancho a desirable place to live. For that reason we ask the city to protect our property value by denying permission from the proposed project. 3. Technical reason: A funeral home brings people, because they have to come pay respect to their loved ones. This is a problem if all these people have to do this in other residents' neighborhood. Traffic congestion will be an expected problem. We don't want to be driving into our neighborhood and start struggling for parking.The City should stop this project. Sincerely Hezron and Victoria 7 '" 0 .----- ---:::::,. - , ,-. .. - .. 411, CD O � < CD � � � ' -p CD n ,.. C ED CD w CD 0-. O �+ O — < o .�_ ) QO 1) � = al a. CD rn --3 0 o O O _-.1 o 3 = - _ • - . O O CD -' n o to Q , `< • 0 6 c �D _ . T. Cl) 0 0 --- � -1 t► C CD 0 rn � W �' C, w n XM COD �• NCCD + _ O = _. n O CD gyp'* g .. -: - -.,:-..y. .:. -0 , ri) 5- u) ,0 ea o m w (1) 0..) g O CD _•CD 0 � � 077 - - 4. _‘ co Ocl 0 CD .--.. .O c ....„, cci -4, .._%," N C0) D _ -0 CD O) 3 = O — < co Ornc� mcp j1 O � � cocoCD o--- 4:. 0 2 ., g.. .-,..„:":,...:.. _..._ .p cr) .c.) 0-- ,..,_= ei.) ,-... = = 0 0,) sl) = } .. Q ca. — O CD np:, nireert,,) iiiiiro.„ ... i 41. i c ,..„ n i ce6 z _____. o L , ,. r ,, _ .�! �'x. t 4 ! 47 11`1♦r �y F �J .trtr.tfr . 1..;.!i r.., • 4._,..'... l'• - - . : -• t_; - L:_ . a ,..-;," . -1:.-1 ... 1:— =ra z. 1 ,. ' �. ` k�1 r i •N e Ir ,t'1. R;i'd r 1Q a 1 ■■ ETAAt `.~`,` Y .r.- I -� -- • y .t - \ \ �.,. ' b eft ,,s-11,, •'A �. I lei••v imp "" X ......-1,7,-.::,__,__ .1�• \�. ,,,,-',1,4 ,(':j '4I a) Eiji t 5 r . ' fra i ' 1r, EF ,� f ) la 'M1fC � Li zr "' rt ,- - " wx3 1►. �1' `� ,,� J Y , Ali` ,�• � tl rye �(� .- ^+�►}�p;- Tlis c.vo h !' \. s ply, ?f ' ` - l�' xr�'' .; f� � �},A _�5d$7!AP/ 7 fe''.T• f . L`y l'�? �F1 L m o� i 44 • • M/ - ST .. '� L . --;...AtitsVir,i . . ,,•_. • i ii,1 , , , . . „„ut CD I It I !. mOO -: v tJI :c-Dh 0 ,...., _I., `C..„ 4B . ' °- 2 * G) = ' o CD r+ (I) N r+► O CD N CD 4 v a Cn (n ,_p r+ ,� O rT co .) 5 O < p. CD o N CDC '- N O n ,n-.r- O W =- d CD _ U1 ` r+ -0 p r-* -Q S cr CAD rF o Fe', . cD v v �'• _ CDD ^ . p -i n r+ Q. �cp CDC O — — CD N W — O D CD D:. CD t!� CI — - "I v cOn 5 = 3 v cD v n o ca .. m 0 ; - y C co cD =' _ CO ° CO o o• v ,---, - o 111:: > o<o rn CD o mtnZto mtoZW r- a) oo mvoo S� *. �_ K30O0 rOCD K , 00o 0. 2 CD KCD Q � CD KCD CD C CD D CD "D cD � c' cn a)EP 3 N CT 3 cn to CCD x cn to 0 M _ _ a - ° r CD 0 0 0 CO 0.) -0 a Sy 0 rn m _ aD _. S <• C * O 3`- . me cr• CD =m = -I 0 o w _ 0 o 0 C � . .. . ;y -v n = � t -� , r (I i O O < _ c0 0 -, su , QCD (fii '''''.:.1.2.....' -...•-•;;;....--'.:;'... ..1.:.:1-'1 ::.....1.---'.::•:'-.. ::''''.....Y::-.-- o CP sv c�u . (/) • , . •_ kill ... . 4 . / -_......... , _ r k . • —............_ _ . , --...-411.111116.1 Etiwanda Aven lie . . . . _ • .. . _.• _ . ... . - • 4 ' 104,, ' -• - . . it , A A C) 'a. . 'rir - 111 il J . ' • Is . ' =1; ir • el t :,. i • - i i Cri 41 -) t rr 41• 411.1 . 1 . * . , ..„...........,...r_.__7„,,,,,./ . 0 , ... •• r 0 .,, - I;t• I • E '.... . . \ < i o 1 k< • ass CD • ■ 4 44 121) . \ ., . , . .... EX bil rY P 1 0. , ... 4. 1.1... . .., lk, e 4:• ' - i r4.., . • 4 4 .. 1 1,1 4 ' i 0 1 . --. ,..11 s At+ 0,,,.: ............ _ , ir--- . 1 I , wow §- - \ C rawford PI .:4 %\,..\,..,,..--. . . s ...,) )1 • 0 ....,„ \ .11.1 't-•-• - N li - - -dk%lit ik \ 'N. • %., bl : : og 3 .LI91HX3 1 m L 111 iii an R 1 w ' y,• =:: :r L. t .~ J - N. ^ 1{ .'Pi.:Pt, ii IJ ' t,i . 1 S '� i t`4.- - l !,\ x--11 '4,. • 1 f-c I, ! I ° _ . t,L 11 a 4t s :* �o t , . , #I !; v; lin y ` is . . ` ,. I'►" •• r !j ` E'w kit •'t t I� �! #:� a= r'^ rG .. .Acs � S,-L I .� i :'£.t_r. r• Imo`?- .\ ,vi ,_ �i.,"a i 1�i`�M ."". 4.• y i •t �•r. X] 9t• •` L .� „ ��! •',mow:wraQ... I. i.�.":`.. 99{kin i. '''A.4'NskN4- 1 '• li i I ice. t., 1..s 4o,_ t �f , '�. �, F tt / k , �l • •••t j ‘ .` f L 5:./�• y \ '. • t a ` ..,:.:14‘ 4.,•:,4..,-, ,,,',r4..„, ,- : t ~ , ", -10, 1.1000,qr- , . 1 1 1 5ii ., blot '''''‘a ‘. 1\a' s -N . V ' --. 4"- -.V.II a ,,,, ..„..,,..‘i,,,e,...,..V.k-v.: s'A+ \\.:0,1 ,., I r, 1 ilem IP Is illiF a,4.11 ql lif fill Of : 1 IN F �'�!!'°"c' r 9 iir fir 191 ' Vii; :;\, 1!. f �+�•� i ex►wiEM nvMM11 r SITE C V I t.IG1111VCS• Norm mom. HOME "'" 1a 130648 �?i MAP .,...........�. uiiixiaa.e • •••,-a•n•of I.«wr 91 6 9 V OIIaIHX E_TIWANDA_AVENUE 1112 1 IR rii _ :sikaim''' Viiiir , -fv" J 1 III a ..,m1x§.. - ii -,N..,,Ti,,,,W,,, 1 I, 1 ' L i 7 a let li ;iii i . • el — i l I l I • -, •• p6 141 161 I Ilt ,___ ,1. :Ai' JUIN I, I 1 ....)1.1.„ 1 L, , . 1 i it JP in I_______ w P r ' f / to -;"weic an. 4,4. V . ifilqtailq;(21 4, * z> le0141:- iA'• 1 i ;I %is. 1:1) )0 i r 1141P: '11 d 1 !Ili I ' I r i ii , .il \ li cn :: 11 9N1 orilill 1 .-- iliu Toil . i i i itir --.:-.1 -,, , I i ._ q f Mi111014 _ l"'r-- • • • • 0 . i ccD c5 rell• Foh-Fp) 01 = :C:).: CD CD - O C �._ CD a) M C - C7 <..- = O n CD O n O -I y rn 4.< _ CD a) CD = - n O = Cn ' O < Ca) 0 �' o) O Q CO �, —. Th 0 CD O (0 O O = O = T (o O CD N = O `�Ca * aT K c -0 ii r.P.: o > 0 - . ,m, 1 . s- ii. " 0 -, < CD -I ma y y�, I.CD • n CD !f, • � CD cn -.X 0 CD 0 = C) • CD � (1) "'� C.) O■ cr co c 3 o 0 CD . . - CD D o CD c)-- 0 cw _ —I..o o = CCD = o _ 3 a, z � � a) -1- . . C Q g 0 =. C CD CD Mb Id to a. CA , CO .:''''''''''. ..'7 .. i---Ort •i' lliir E0073 .5 cn i g..) E > xi r : ,..:=,...:::, :s.::44. j. If ",.... 0 = cD a m o Br 2,1 :,1 M 0 -• . ... .,--.' ,-..... . vf C ID 0 ,--• 07, cn ..1., = Ca) 0 Cr -. i. i --Azie , o N D 3 Cl) C c su o 0 3 co co > , 01 W -.1 co -4 . W Wo U p O cn cn N v cn �N _ -n —n . : 0 co c CD cD m CD v 3 ED c CD . _ 11 al: ° O , Q i o c a c vi- ca _ __ �u) o Cl) = )73 a < 0 a (U Q s C CD O CD 5- v n• Cz Q- o Cn 0 m cQ Cl) cis •= cv cI n o- c 3 v cD =co c Cn n •D N CD o 0 SU Q) =� 0 ' .:2-,:;-:t...-.-::: :'_ 3 0 CZ eL cn < Q co c N, C) (D 3 N v cu cn 0_ CD CD c 0 0) CD co O tin 819Vtl 11IeIHXB - 1UlIltUJ.II MIll - ® I••u•o�_ ■��MM ,inurNN�1i�u ;; u sal i I; sY�� — , - ; ck . ■.e I Z .;!I i 4 AI _as V I i L; jt i NI 1 -f' 3 �� ��� , 1 4, . � I, [ - it it.....r.:- !. N 6 11: 1 i g . .0 E _ . { \/ D I IlIllIllIlIl I w � - o IIIIlIIIIIII . ,. ; ti i .0 ., 1 r1 t • .t', 1 H 1 LVr I 1 i 0. , ; ,1 - II/l ,:,li 4I ill • i f � ju '!F Y 2 t;= � Y .�A 0 14 i Et 1 1 " }mz i_ cm n 03 rn • • • 3 =, .-. •.: ..:.. .....'...I:,:;:- ...::. :.j._.-1.1:-..1.:-1.-:::,-1:..::::•_. . (7) C7 Cn �1 D 00 _ _ Q �! :-+ _ O CCD m rn CD CD D ° ? o ° ' P- a. = ai v s� � � o D � � < � mom - � D O m -v , n , y, -__ = ED CD _-�.. co oa CD • Q ED _ •o • m • CD .. _ _• CD SD CD m . Q • -= ' my w ' nikilIC a" • • • • • • • • - -' to 3 Q CO a �� co 5. g = =. -,. Fr 3 —,„ 73 as, p = �� QD — � � o c p < p 06 gi' 0 n I XI o n O o o <■ al c_ = _a 3 0,2 _.... 3 * . .. .. TD I (�ie. (7, c cD I n ccn 2 N 0} N = N I = -I = Nc- -A. Lp � NO � __ _- _ c - NoN2) NON � _ _ � - _ N N O Ni N C N W O N N = _ N . - = - _ N HiJ9IHX3 r'f1 r; F.,..1 , ::*.p-:. __. .. • ..... 1 iii'.'+� �; j + iii I ; I .. IINIA '; i.1, ;..,,!y,...pli._ i,!:...,, 1 ii)„,. :„...; ... 1,•.; .i..... _ _, ••,..4 1 , ! ';IEI.;ii. t !��,id i tru IrI ", I I; i;!4;411.•' I1141• I�I'I. .; I$1 a I 1 o 2II!II! ` l lq` II7 1INIIhil 1!: 1II ' -;.;MOE !I.i.ifite,"; J 1=: Ii : •'f 1IIiiJLi \1 tllll i:i. I' Lam; II s ti. 1 ! ! i -`;!II1IIIIUIIL! i .fII1 IIlI11I1 I 1 �� 1, l!IIIIIIOI 1(II I ..; ;111I f' 111J11:!!I i I , III .! �,► ; i Ili; . —I + ,!iiiiuullll� III i 1111111111 „ It•-n : I ?1 II ,tn • ,-, _-- 11 -.....r _i ,, Et _< 1ir ' 4 1 '2 1 > 11: . I l -r - '° 111111.* 1; 1 Igo IVV . i Mao inumlNllii 'at , a f I!.r t VIP Ir :I Z 4 11111 �: � l II . �a�;1 J I i IIIIIIIIII� :I lllffil l ,. __ 'IIIII1111111I ! l',.. _I, Mg 1 _ 4. r- I k .. 'T A.r` I. � _• t 1 • 4. Iii( . 1111111 k ,r z I_F,��: i liiiq is17 w .,'ud I1IUlk 1 it •riy�:ff �_II i '..'L..::IIIIllll 41. rn I ,, Er, 41] II ° 1 0 lig" 1 ill _r- rk._, • • • . ... ,..-._--.y. • • • _ ... .. .. •. . _ vike.0 : - 0 - 1— 2H=L:,,--.:,--. . .- ::._ .: ft :., 1 3 < CD =cD �, o 0 o N o n........ , • • , Da 0.) — o ' • -... :. 0 . m . ._ ... o ri±. P o Q z C7 �D 3 .. rn c Q o �Q , O S • =- o -0 --.. .--. -;:,,,.. ..-.:-.-:;;_..,:::-y.--.:-...,--.,.-..:-:-. --.-:.-,:-,-..,.--,.,..,•:..7:,--•,.;-.-.;:„•• ...„ 3 :i:.:-, . : .• o co al - • o ...ii- ,.• rn cn �• c�--�u c� ri_ _ • .. . . __._ t'") npzi r---0) 2. ,... n i , z o L 'N� .. . , ..., __.._: . .. .. 4 ,. 1 :1/1-4 I: . 0 s te I .� - ti - , :r' . - r-_ L - / ' � T ,J•4 ft,: '441:• - -1�. +n..;`�f i .x`:73 - 4' r t ■.� 9, - / ` • , N -- -- - . . . • i.,. . , . . . • , ..... . c f-1 1.., , : .... : - , ... . ,, • ' 4 , eJjj 477.t.... 7. . � 1-- , f t,..• . f� a . -L.s;'fi r' . . 0 • .4 • V s . R _°1-- '4. zt t. 1's -::, " r74117 • la .. 4 3. — — , i,. : ( • . .., . , � '� 4. I a �. + ,l� 1" 1ti fie. f 7 ` l�.a—+ 4,, - ...:. ,.. , .- ,4 lin)i-,.?_/, 'I A....9- -111:-..4 1 ' 1 ' 1 .tA):, ' . 1 ,. ` •• It ay - 4 i•-',•,i7, '� ` ._i'. _ 'er �1 ' ! WODDS REAP— k •\ 1� - �"-Lit 3' i tt . N. Y . k __ ,...s .... „ __ ;_ .__ . cumpzi r--1()tortv) .., 2 5 z 1. vri , o Ly' ...._,, . .. ,lik:'. I 1,_ -, ..I,- li-ritil:,:. "•;11. :st; -. •-•., , .9,ttj. ,,444.1.. ,,,.. ,‘. , ..„.4iiiiff, A ,I, ' N 1•'yt ` c4�3� .. .} a "7:S.ik GAF UE_' .I.12... .44.4 4 YK.. es• 0 A . 1..,. 'IR • i..'' ,•111-4 3--, .1 4 ' .4.11. ....i;41 4,,,,';•. 1`'. • ;: A oti!-V-'., '7'tie . I N : _ n.',, . * c `Lhy S > `tis'7-7 a 0 • ' 4 I �. x r_ .� R- • .x.?' � /III ,1:1.___ _. ., ,...t,-1%4,___i .....7,--.15:.,-ce - '` ';'� i• . - ,..-. • 1..g ° v' ° ti ' 4- X.,.-�3V\: • —.• :t ; at ..... r. r _• ■ ,�;ii;1 . I r i II! `, L i•r- 7 r 1p r ,-� 1. �'it 4- -- i 'r, r f ` 1- �r •ni 2 Spy x •i-, • e _ • 4 r ,� a. �. t A .<I ' 0'. �. k Y I nnlor- K `i + Ii -N 1.i 4 � �1 t• ' ` ouTF �' 11 �y !' �' ;D:h,., f o .1.CY o: .6. x 1 �. T `a �r+i����rw.dd � 4r �..Y»5-r. lq • ':2'-L;T.y' .- - n •A' ', o•�"� '1 .:war• m.. .. • ,�I , � f y t L y + y �� :,Y +R-112' '110-11-11111% ( 7 End iC� jV1JJ;1f l' time f 1 :',1 . \. '� r w .. 1i7e ,Fht) C zO L—� , maril.. .1 - - __ , 9Frim.,,, ,:.,:. _, ,,,. , . w '`� p x, r - • pa fI, i �Ir' � ' it� rn 2r II• ��1f a\ F ./p� m • ,11 1 L11 E CD CD T i1Jt I A n , V Z co Q IF 9 i �p o m IW: 7 c a f o z I .. ,�s;:; m• ii _ E ._ x@10 ^ , n im cn ■i f _ lilt 1" �1 ' f "_lam , o �+ts!..ii6,\I l g��1r f I ,i .- r l =ra ,44n ` Al- i > i i " ° 1 '��_� iii' ���� c!,�'� ,Lp.., 1 V.,We. 1- ' - J li ri---4 d k .-`4'. --__ p ,..1 1 ... 1 .:,„,„-,........___,,,,,0:47: 1 I' i 1 , op, iino I i 1 i 1 ., ‘ mil ij I I :;I. l - 1 -lop ___11 IMISMMA ..4 rte[_ ti rn..fw. NAOMII le iMI1NMavi.ir , •,—•,.a. �' A -, 4 -s--%\,,,,_ 4 tr ..1 i ..,.\-•1:11-ill it. , 4111M11.111r 107e: 1 '1 i \.,, , I tir=14 -71. ' 111111=9/kW • I, , 1 i i 1:: '""' r ..._ ., 1E: gE t ` •� ra t ■.s • 1 hrge s. \\ \ ,,,". .„. diowl...et,,,,e i LI__ ,,..\\ \\ \\*NV-4i ,OVIi ;.' i•— 1 40:0 ,_. ,,..„, „if, 4 1\00, r _t_ 1 ..., \\ ,...., i \,41,0pAeS‘4,01.?_ .,,, lir,. 4 . = u„,2 116. .„___ el\"...\,S"\.,,, \\ ■ \ ,.. :Ala e:-.611 1Z k ".. , \„\\St% 1 1 . 'lilt:NZ 6?/./, * \4 t.Wr,i XI '‘ "1'1 C04,/,, % l'14 git: e, L.. o / i , 0 00 0 ' Mr Ei r l� \:\ . /fir �.' • e- • ,... i, , ria ,fil t_ a I 011.16400:1,4 iiillEcimorrii , z ;i � � i yi�+� `� . 'riff _•;,.'' ^�` i �- ��If p. -i:t}I 11,11 l lilt, ii I iiii. .1g in li • 4 1 gm$ . II 1 I1! "1PI 11111111011!ii li iit'hi ' f�■o�+ pp r �/1t w�-+ ha I— ! ` 11 . ,� ' D �nwt t.rer rw.. TERRA LINDA VILLAGE ! 'ei . t f us , P •f TERRA LINDA PROPERTIES LLC II H 4 v. mcs. . , 00 M I A. I 0 RESOLUTION NO. 12-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-01094, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A FUNERAL HOME (THAT WILL NOT INCLUDE A CREMATORY, A CEMETERY, NOR CONDUCT EMBALMING) WITH A FLOOR AREA OF 6,911 SQUARE FEET AND A PORTE-COCHERE OF 1,371 SQUARE FEET ON A VACANT PARCEL OF 2.32 ACRES , e : S A - se - PARCEL SLUBJECT TO OUTCOME OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SUBLLA#691)WITHIN THE ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL (OP) DISTRICT OF THE • ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CANDLEWOOD STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1100-031-07. A. Recitals. 1. HMR Architects, on behalf of SCI Funeral Services, Inc., filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-01094, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of July 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on July 25, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant, irregularly-shaped parcel located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street; and b. The parcel is approximately 164,200 square feet(3.77 acres) in area. As part of the proposal, the applicant has submitted a Lot Line Adjustment(Related file: Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). This adjustment will change the alignment of the property line. Following the adjustment the rectangular parcel will have an area of approximately 101,000 square feet (2.32 acres)with overall dimensions of approximately 350 feet (east to west) by approximately 307 feet (north to south); and A& B 262 RESOLUTION NO. 12-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-01094D, A REVIEW OF A PROPOSED FUNERAL HOME(THAT WILL NOT INCLUDE A CREMATORY,A CEMETARY, NOR CONDUCT EMBALMING)WITH A FLOOR AREA OF 6,911 SQUARE FEET AND A PORTE-COCHERE OF 1,371 SQUARE FEET ON A VACANT PARCEL OF 2.32 ACRES (NOTE: FINAL AREA OF THE PARCEL WITHIN THE ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL (OP) DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CANDLEWOOD STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1100-031-07. A. Recitals. 1. HMR Architects, on behalf of SCI Funeral Services, Inc., filed an application for the issuance of Development Review DRC2011-01094D, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of July 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on July 25, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant, irregularly-shaped parcel located generally at the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street; and b. The parcel is approximately 164,200 square feet(3.77 acres) in area. As part of the proposal the applicant has submitted a Lot Line Adjustment(Related file: Lot Line Adjustment SUBLLA#691). This adjustment will change the alignment of the property line. Following the adjustment the rectangular parcel will have an area of approximately 101,000 square feet (2.32acres) with overall dimensions of approximately 350 feet (east to west) by approximately 307 feet(north to south); and A& B 300